Item 6 SOUTHLAK.E
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
October 29, 2021
CASE NO: ZA20-0082
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Pemberton
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: DeCavitte Properties is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat on property
described as Tract 5A03, Samuel Freeman Survey, No. 525 Addition, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, located at 603 N. Kimball Avenue, Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN
Neighborhood #4.
DETAILS: The property is generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of N.
Kimball Avenue and Still Water Court.
The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Preliminary Plat to develop 6
residential lots on 3.749 acres in conformance with the approved Zoning Change
and Concept Plan for Pemberton (ZA21-0058) approved by City Council on
October 5, 2021.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated October 29, 2021
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
Presentation
Plans
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
SPIN Report
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Patty Moos (817) 748-8629
Case No.
ZA21-0082
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNERS: Sicem603, LLC
APPLICANT: Dean DeCavitte
PROPERTY SITUATION: 603 N. Kimball Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 5A03, Samuel Freeman Survey, No. 525 Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" — Single Family Residential District
HISTORY: "AG" Zoning District was approved with the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance No 480 and the official Zoning Map on September 19, 1989.
October 5, 2021; City Council approved Option `A' for the development
and granted a variance to Subdivision Ordinance 483, as amended
(Section 5.02) The proposed street R.O.W. does not meet the minimum
50 ft. width at its connection point with Cotswold Valley Court. Cotswold
Valley Court was approved with a 40 ft. R.O.W. The proposed Pemberton
Drive transitions from a 50 ft. R.O.W. to a 40 ft. R.O.W. to match up with
the Cotswold Valley Ct. (ZA21-0058)
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the  e Fi o
site is "Medium Density Residential". The
request to change the zoning to "SF-20A" LL�l
Single Family Residential District which is
consistent with this land use designation.
M dij a 't sid I
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows N.
Kimball Avenue as a divided 4-lane local street ni- ub
with 88' of right of way. The N. Kimball Avenue right-of way was provided
with the street expansion. Still Water Ct. is a 2-lane local street with a 50-
foot right-of-way. The new proposed street (Pemberton Drive) connection
from Still Water Ct. to Cotswold Valley Ct. will be a 50-foot right-of-way
with be dedicated with this development. The Pemberton Drive right-of-
way will be reduced to a 40-foot right-of way near the Cotswold Valley Ct.
connection. The applicant has requested a variance to allow this right-of-
way reduction.
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: There is currently an existing 6-foot sidewalk on the east side of N.
Kimball Avenue. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot sidewalk on the south
side of Still Water Ct. and along the Pemberton Drive 50-foot right-of-way
and 40-foot reduced right-of-way connection. A portion of the southern 5-
foot sidewalk on each side of Pemberton Drive will be located within a 5-
foot sidewalk and utility easement adjacent to the existing Cotswold
Valley development.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0082 Page 1
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Currently, N. Kimball Avenue is an 88-foot, 4-lane divided arterial. Still
Water Court is currently constructed as a 30 ft. wide local street within a
50-foot right-of-way. Cotswold Valley Ct. is a 2-lane 40-foot wide right-of
way street with a cul-de-sac with a 55-foot radius and a 40-foot right-of-
way stub out at the north end of the cu-de-sac.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development.
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D.
The proposed preservation of existing tree cover complies with the
Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance. There is 30.31% of existing tree cover on the site and a
minimum of 60% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A
total of 63.99% of existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved, and
20.41% is designated as marginal.
UTILITIES: An existing 8-inch water line is located along the north side of Still Water
Ct. and an 8-inch line extending to the north property line at the Cotswold
Valley Ct. cul-de-sac. The applicant is proposing to connect an 8-inch
water line at the 8-inch waterline in Still Water Ct. along the east side of
Pemberton Drive to the 8-inch water line at the Cotswold Valley Ct. cul-
de-sac.
There is an existing 10-inch sewer line along the west side of the
Cotswold Valley Ct. cul-de-sac. The applicant is proposing to provide 8-
inch sewer connection from the Cotswold Valley Ct. cul-de-sac north
along the within Pemberton Drive to Lots 2 and 3.
DRAINAGE: The drainage generally flows to the east on the southern portion of the lot
and flows north at the northwest portion of the property.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on August 10, 2021.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on June 2, 2021.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated October 29, 2021.
WCommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12021 CasesO082-PP-Pemberton
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0082 Page 2
Vicinity Map
Pemberton 603 N. Kimball Avenue
2115 IIr
R 4 rM I
g 1112 11{6 1104 lift � �r
7039
2015 y
12 fi
s0 W
{ S R b10 22, 4 k
2bL4 #
ash Y 22
1! $
14
p,d d
R.1219 2fl26 G R # hld
p
2fQl
$ -
9 g
3
22U6
2 ?4rp 24M 218d
242d
E KIRKWOOD 6LV , 21i6 2iip 2a7g gam
Sdpa 2M R
2131 41 $
212,
2XI �1
2cm 24MM p 2SW 7515
REE EEWB
f W 2111 214111 11d, 2411
4A 242E 23M$ Xd9 2M 2M
2,Cd
LN -Sn 2-W 2643 2021 #71
o-a
$6 a� It N
$
8
eL - ZA 1 -00 V
Preliminary Plat
i
0 FEEL
Case No. Attachment B
ZA21-0082 Page 1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA21-0082 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 10/29/21
Project Name: Preliminary Plat for Pemberton
APPLICANT: Sicem603, LLC ENGINEER: Icon Engineering
Dean DeCavitte Clayton Redinger
P.O. Box 92446
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-946-0346 Phone: 817-253-5727
Email: dean.decavitte(a)-gmai1.com Email: credinger(o)iconengineering.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10-7-2021 AND WE OFFER THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Patty Moos
Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8269
Email: pmoosCa)-ci.south lake.tx.us
1. Dimension all building lines for each lot.
2. The typical lot detail does not appear to match the easements shown along the street. Correct the
discrepancy.
3. If a wall or the landscape bufferyard along N. Kimball Avenue is to be maintained by an established
owners' association, it is recommended that a wall and/or landscape easement be provided that is
dedicated to and maintained by the HOA.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin(cr ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
The proposed Tree Conservation Plan complies with the Tree Conservation Analysis proposed with
the Zoning Development Plan. There is 29.5% of existing tree cover and a minimum of 60% of the
existing tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 64.2% of the
existing tree cover, and 35.8% is proposed to be removed or as marginal.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Case No.
ZA21-0082 Page 2
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% —20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandy Endy, P.E.,
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy(a)-ci.south lake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Calculations showing how the drainage easement within Lots 3 and 4 was determined shall be
provided with the first submittal of the final plat and the civil construction plans. The drainage
easement boundaries shall comply with the Drainage Ordinance and shall be of sufficient width to
contain the ultimate 100-year storm plus one foot of freeboard.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8223
E-mail: kclements(a)ci.south lake.tx.us
Case No.
ZA21-0082 Page 3
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
The following should be informational comments only
It appears this property lies within the 65' LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring
construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No.
479. Additionally, the "Avigation Easement and Release" shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision
Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records.
A final plat must be processed and approved prior to execution of a developer's agreement.
A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Case No.
ZA21-0082 Page 4
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
- s
E2
o
13 1
SOUTHLAK� ° ^°
_ 121 $
890 7212
�e FA E N AY 2218
924 2201 2205 2209 2213 8
920 �B 001
918,
912 Q 17 2020 J
908 Z 73 4 0+�2025 ^ e m p} 11Y
4 2021 Y Q
.0 0 4 vri
z
22M 229
20M
E KIRKWOOD BLVD g
201T 2101 2111 FT
2131 141 2�µO
2121
2001 � fy
a g REENBOUG
GF& 0 'B LN 2Ic
4t7
Owner
ZoningPhysicalAddress • Response
1. AZAMAR, PETER SF1-A 780 SHADY LN 0.35 NR
2. AZAMAR, PETER SF1-A 800 SHADY LN 0.69 NR
3. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 700 N KIMBALL AVE 3.66 NR
J &A FRITH PROPERTIES
4. NR
SOUTHLA SP2 584 N KIMBALL AVE 0.47
JAD LAND MANAGEMENT LLC
5 NR
SERIES SP1 630 N KIMBALL AVE 0.58
ADITYA&AARUSH (ADI-ARU)
6. NR
ENTE SP2 578 N KIMBALL AVE 0.50
7. AZAMAR, PETER SF1-A 780 SHADY LN 0.52 NR
8. AZAMAR, PETER SF1-A 800 SHADY LN 1.32 NR
9. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF SF1-A 840 SHADY LN 0.82 NR
10. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TZD 932 GLEN LAKE DR 9.62 NR
11. WALTZ,THOMAS SF20A 2212 STILL WATER CT 1.01 NR
12. TAYLOR, DEBORAH R SF1-A 610 SHADY LN 0.86 NR
13. NGUYEN, DAN DINH SF20A 2208 STILL WATER CT 0.92 NR
14. AMOS,JAMES H SF20A 2204 STILL WATER CT 1.27 NR
15. DENMAN, GARRY SF20A 2200 STILL WATER CT 1.03 NR
2236 COTSWOLD VALLEY
16. NR
SHARMA, ARVIND RPUD CT 0.26
2200 COTSWOLD VALLEY
17. NR
BALDWIN, RICHARD RPUD CT 0.27
2244 COTSWOLD VALLEY
18. NR
ASHER, GREGORY B RPUD CT 0.27
2240 COTSWOLD VALLEY
19. NR
RAHMAN, MADIHA RPUD CT 0.34
2232 COTSWOLD VALLEY
20. NR
LO, CHAKYAN RPUD CT 0.25
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0082 Pagel
2208 COTSWOLD VALLEY
21. NR
SMITH, MICHAEL J RPUD CT 0.24
2204 COTSWOLD VALLEY
22. NR
CURRENT OWNER RPUD CT 0.25
2229 COTSWOLD VALLEY
23. NR
CURETON, RICHARD RPUD CT 0.38
24. SICEM 603 LLC AG 603 N KIMBALL AVE 3.70 NR
2237 COTSWOLD VALLEY
25. NR
DOLL, PAUL G RPUD CT 0.41
26. AZAMAR, PETER SF1-A 780 SHADY LN 0.28 NR
27. OATES, CINDY ZIGLAR SF1-A 712 SHADY LN 1.24 NR
2221 COTSWOLD VALLEY
28. NR
579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD CT 2.76
CARRASCO JEREMY AND ANGELA
29' NR
REV SF1-A 616 SHADY LN 0.92
30. GILMAN INVESTMENTS LLC SP2 590 N KIMBALL AVE 0.55 NR
J &A FRITH PROPERTIES
31. NR
SOUTHLA SP2 596 N KIMBALL AVE 0.31
J &A FRITH PROPERTIES
32. NR
SOUTHLA SP1 620 N KIMBALL AVE 0.77
33. Supt of Carroll ISD NR
34. Supt of Grapevine Colleyville ISD NR
35. Supt of Northwest ISD NR
36. Supt of Keller ISD NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:Twenty-eight (28)
Responses Received within 200 ft: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 2 Undecided: 0 No Response: 28
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0082 Page 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES
No responses received to date
Case No. Attachment E
ZA21-0082 Page 1