480-462CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS OFFICIAL RECORD
ORDINANCE NO.480-462
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR
TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 1A & 1B, SITUATED IN THE W. MILLS
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1086, TRACT 3, SITUATED IN THE W. MILLS
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 877D, TRACT 2, SITUATED IN THE W. MEDLIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1958, AND TRACT 4, SITUATED IN THE W.
MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1588D, BEING APPROXIMATELY 55.53
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
"A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "SF-20A" SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN, INCLUDING PUD DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED
IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN
THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas
Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other
structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance
and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in
accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned "AG" Agricultural District
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 1
under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the
City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes
should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the
area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements
and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the
neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent
property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the
proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by
requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for
parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to
control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the
over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other
things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to
conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this
City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the
amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or
improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 2
was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding
of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a
change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land
requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that
the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and
are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps
promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas,
passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that
the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and
described below:
Being Tracts IA & 1B, situated in the W. Mills Survey, Abstract No. 1086, Tract 3,
situated in the W. Mills Survey, Abstract No. 877D, Tract 2, situated in the W. Medlin
Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and Tract 4, situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No.
1588D, being approximately 55.53 acres, and more fully and completely described in
Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development District with "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District uses as depicted
on the approved Development Plan, including PUD development standards, attached
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 3
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following specific
conditions:
1. Approving the development regulation that the minimum area of a lot shall not be less than
twenty thousand (20,000) square feet.
2. Approving the development regulation that the minimum front yard of a lot shall not be
less than thirty (30) feet.
3. Approving the development regulation that the minimum side yard shall not be less than
ten (10) feet.
4. Approving the development regulation that the minimum side yard abutting a street shall
not be less than twenty-five (25) feet unless otherwise noted.
5. Approving the development regulation that each lot shall have a minimum width of eighty
(80) feet.
6. Approving the development regulation that each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of
thirty (30) feet.
7. Approving the development regulation that Section 8.01E of the Subdivision Ordinance
No. 483, as amended, regarding lot width along the rear property line of certain lots shall
not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development.
8. Approving the development regulation that Section 8.01 G of the Subdivision Ordinance
No. 483, as amended, regarding buffer lots adjacent to certain lots shall not apply to
property within this Residential Planned Unit Development.
9. Subject to the P&Z Commission recommendation that the open space/park shown as Lot 5,
Block 2, even if accepted as a public park, shall be maintained by the Home Owner's
Association;
10. Subject to moving lots 20 through 24 south to allow for a 70-foot wide access strip on the
north side of lot 20, block 22, and narrowing each of those lots but not below a minimum
of one acre for each lot;
11. Allowing the applicant to shorten the height of the southern -most lot by approximately ten
feet;
12. Requiring the open space to be labeled on the plan as "private open space" and any further
evaluation of any dedication of such private open space should be after the applicant has
submitted a level two environmental site study to be performed by a qualified firm
approved by the city.
13. Subject to the following comments from Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated
July 27, 2005:
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 4
a. Label all existing easements on or adjacent to this site with the type and width. Label
the filing record for existing easements. Several easements have not been shown
and/or labeled.
b. Where adjacent property is un-platted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E.
along the property line. If adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide
a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line. However, Staff recommends that
easements be placed only where needed to provide necessary utility services and,
where possible, be placed in a manner that minimized impacts on existing quality trees.
c. Correct the label to read Common Access Easement.
d. Locate drainage easements in a manner that promotes tree preservation.
e. Label the existing R.O.W. width for T.W. King Road. Label the width of the traveled
roadway pavement.
f. Identify which portion of the property is affected by the 65 LDN limit line.
g. Prior to submitting a final plat and developer's agreement for review, a
recommendation from the City's Park Board regarding the proposed park land
dedication must be received. The recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning
and Zoning Commission as part of the consideration for the final plat approval and to
the City Council, including the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission, as part of the consideration for the developer's agreement.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be
subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and
pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs,
sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain
intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 5
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with
the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of
the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions
reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide
adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and
to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks
and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its
peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,
affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances
where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the
validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared
to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of
land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with
or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall
constitute a separate offense.
Case No.
ZA05-058
Ordinance No. 480-462
Page 6
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of
the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have
accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all
pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same
shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance
or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon
at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the
imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City
Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10)
days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 191h day of July, 2005.
Case No.
ZA05-058
MAYOR
moo` J�(HLA/�F''''•.
ATTEST: O .•••......: '
•;t�`
� e 1%
o •
•
Ordinance Nlet,,A&6
Page 7
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 2°d day of August, 2005.
-==2YOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETAR
APPROVED XS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: i0- q,os:-
ADOPTED: 8 - 2-DS-
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 8
EXHIBIT "A"
Being Tracts 1 A & 1 B, situated in the W. Mills Survey, Abstract No. 1086, Tract 3, situated in the W.
Mills Survey, Abstract No. 877D, Tract 2, situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and Tract
4, situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 15881), and being approximately 55.53 acres:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Clariaen Ranch IV - The CIIffs
FIELD NOTES TO 55.53 ACRES IN THE WM. MILLS SURVEY ABSTRACT 877, THE WILSON MEDLIN SURVEY ABSTRACT 1588, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND
THE WM. MILLS SURVEY ABSTRACT 1086, THE WILSON MEDLIN SURVEY ABSTRACT 1958, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS..
ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF SITUATED IN THE WILLIAM MILLS SURVEY ABSTRACT 877 AND THE WILSON MEDLIN SURVEY ABSTRACT 1588,
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND 1N THE WI-LIAM MILLS SURVEY ABSTRACT 1086 AND THE VALSON MEDLIN SL RVEY ABSTRACT 1958, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE CERTAIN 51.95, MORE OR LESS, ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN A DEED FROM GERALD F. HEFFLEY AND F.O. HEFFLEY TO
A.F. DIEN AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 4823 PAGE 575 DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY AND ALL OF (CALLED) 4.75 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN A
DEED FROM HUEY THOMAS TO ALVIN F. OIEN, JR, ON THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1985, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1576 PAGE 446 REAL PROPERTY
RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY AND BEING GENERALLY DESCRIBED IN A SINGLE TRACTAS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING, AT A FENCE CORNER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 51,95 ACRE TRACT AND ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE WM. MILLS
SURVEY ABSTRACT 877;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES AND 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG AND NEAR A FENCE AT A DISTANCE OF 2610.77 FEET TO A POINT FOR
CORNER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF WHITE CHA-EL ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES AND 29 SECONDS WEST WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID ROAD ALONG AND NEAR A FENCE AT A
DISTANCE OF 1003,59 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES AND 31 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 241,83 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 03 DEGREES 51 MINUTES AND 40 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 768,08 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER OF SAID 51.95 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE SOUTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES AND 20 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 143T00 FEET TO A POINT:
THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 12 MINUTES AND 20 SECONDS WEST PAST THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF DENTON COUNTY WHICH IS THE NORTH
BOUNDARY LINE OF TARRANT COUNTY AND CONTINUING A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1105.00 FEET TO A POINT AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID 51,95 ACRE TRACT,
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 25 MINUTES AND 41 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 477,97 FEET TO A POINT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES AND 15 SECONDS WEST ALONG AND NEAR A FENCE PAST THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE VvM, MILLS
SURVEY ABSTRACT 1088 AND CONTINUING PAST THE LINE BETWEEN TARRANT AND DENTON COUNTIES AND CONTINUING A TOTAL DISTANCE OF
723.29 FEET TO A POINT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 4.75 ACRE TRACT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF WM, MILLS SURVEY
ABSTRACT 877 AND THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE W. MEDLIN SURVEY ABSTRACT 1588;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES AND 19 SECONDS WEST PAST AT 539.25 FEET A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF T.W. KING ROAD
AND CONTINUING A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 577.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF W. MEDLIN SURVEY;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES AND 23 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SURVEY A DISTANCE OF 358.19 FEET
TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES AND 50 SECONDS EAST A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 577,56 FEET TO A POINT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID 4.75 ACRE TRACT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE W_ MEDLIN SURVEY AND THE MST BOUNDARY LINE OF WM.. MILLS SURVEY
ABSTRACT 877;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 3o MINUTES AND 48 SECONDS WEST WITH SAID SURVEY LINE ALONG AND NEAR A FENCE A DISTANCE OF 588.33 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 55.53 ACRES OF LAND.
Case No.
ZA05-058
Ordinance No. 480-462
Page 9
Case No.
ZA05-058
EXHIBIT "B"
MOMapxue y
r p�19 lade4D al!4M LPION
ag
-•ram', `�€�sUo ist6
a
a•
•.4s',y 1i: �s �! '�ouE�a # F � a is r 4X§E �3 4 � g ii t
✓ g 3E5�3 iE T i 3a F a Y� � E tE � •Ef _�
1H fig€
9 ] {{ _
eYa s 1f l9 a:s°
Et E
• _ 's .. A b € d� �b ' i� ES 4 � � j�i ai e 9 S3 �� 3! � �Y �jl _r Ea'
. 3SIMIS -.--;;•--1"` �_ F es. i : -
f
41
Pu
i s ���` � c, t. HJN�,3S ��'fDrr � •.. 3 „�� t
-i
1 b ° b
!1 1 F 1 a
a�
- 3 a
e
Ordinance No. 480-462
Page 10
Residential Planned United Development District
for
Clariden Ranch IV
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the "SF-20A" single-family
residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the
following exceptions:
Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet.
Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty (30) feet.
Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
Side Yard
Adjacent to
a Street: The minimum side yard abutting a street shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet unless
otherwise noted.
Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of eighty (80) feet.
Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of thirty (30) feet.
Section 8.01E of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding lot width along the rear
property line of certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development.
Section 8.01G of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding buffer lots adjacent to
certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development.
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 11
Monday, May 16, 2005
Re: Zoning of 56 ac aien Tract on White Chapel across from Bob Jones Park
Terra has contracted to purchase the 56-acre tract of land adjoining and south of Clariden Ranch
Phase 111. The tract is across White Chapel from Bob Jones Park. This has to be one of the most
"challenging" vacant tracts in all of Southlake.
At the southern boundary, of the project stands a cell phone tower. Center and along the south
boundary lays more corps of engineers land similar to the corps land in Bob Jones .Park. Part of
this land also has been dumped on and mined. The west neighbor of the tract has both a T,XU
and a Tri-County power station with power lines along part of the southerly boundary line.
There is also a microwave tower along TW King as well as a Trophy Club elevated water tower
and a ground storage City of Southlake water tower. The tract is also in the flight path.
Years ago the tract was mined for sand and gravel leaving it very disturbed. Lately debris and
construction debris has been dumped on a portion of the site. It is not very attractive in it's
present state and will need much clean up work.
The tract has a low -density land use designation and is zoned AG at this time
Years ago we heard from the residents in the area that they valued the rural drive along White
Chapel as they drove to their neighborhoods. They also place a high value on low density.
Because of this we asked for one -acre lot zoning for Clarid.en Ranch III. We also worked with
the school in our planning giving a wide open feel to the drive down White Chapel.
This plan also is sensitive to those concerns. We are planning six one -acre lots along White
Chapel to give the low density feet as the neighbors drive White Chapel. Behind these lots is a
10+ acre park. Far to the west of the site we do cluster our housing. This is far enough away
that the residents to the north of the neighborhood will never see these homes unless they use
the parks in the project. We started our planning with the assumption that we would comply
with the low density requirement. This has been accomplished by adding 25%- of parks and
open space.
While the tract of land has a tot of negative it has one unique feature and that is "The Cliffs".
These were the result of the earlier mining. We feel that this can be the focal point for the
project. Our plan is to add open space in front and on top of the cliffs to create a special place.
As the plan shows this becomes the jewel of our project.
Terra/Ctariden, L.P. EGTl
** 395 W. Northwest Parkway, Suite 300 * SouthUe, Texas 76092 * Ph 817-410-9201 * Fax 817-410-9205 **
Case No. Ordinance No. 480-462
ZA05-058 Page 12
INVOICE ,,fF
Star -Telegram
400 W. 7TH STREET
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
(817)390-7761
Federal Tax ID 22-3148254
Bill To:
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
1400 MAIN ST
STE 440
SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092-7604
Attn
PAYABLE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORDINANCE NO
THE STATE OF TEXAS
County of Tarrant
Before me, a Notary Public in and for said Counq
for the Star -Telegram, published by the Star-Teleg
that the attached clipping of an advertisement wa:
(817) 390-7320
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, 1
Thank You For Your Payment
Remit To: Star -Telegram
P.O. BOX 901051
FORT WORTH, TX 7
Customer ID:
CIT57
Invoice Number:
258849671
Invoice Date:
8/5/05
Terms:
Net due in 21 days
Due Date:
8/31/05
PO Number:
40207
Order Number:
25884967
Sales Rep:
073
Description:
CITY OF SOUTHLA
Publication Date:
8/5/05
Net Amount:
CHRISTY L. HOLLAND
=•: *s MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
'X. !�t July 31, 2008
:9'o
$ 104.49
$104.49
sonally appeared Lisa Wesselman, Bid and Legal Coordinator
I, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say
named naner on the listed dates: BIDS at LEGAL DEPT. STAR TLEGRAM
s, omits,
uses to
or who
meM-of any of the
Customer ID:
provisions of this or-
dinance shall be fined
not more than Two
Customer Name:
Thousand Dollars
000.00) for each
offense. Each day that
0
Invoice Number:
a violation is permitted
to exist shall consti-
tute a separate of-
Invoice Amount:
fense.
PPROVED
THIS THE
2nd DAY OF Au-
PO Number:
GUST 2005 DUR-
ING HE REGULAR
CITY COUNCIL
Amount Enclosed:
MEETING.
MAYOR: Andy
Wambsganss
SecretaFarwell,
City
d
CIT57
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
258849671
$104.49
40207 1