Loading...
1989-11-13 ZBA meetingi� CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. Carroll Avenue BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MINUTES November 13, 1989 7:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Art Sorenson, Chairman. Members: Ernest Johnson, Joe Bentley, Robert Downard. Alternate 1, Dennis Minder and Alternate 2, Bill Stoner. ABSENT: John Scoggan, Vice -Chairman. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator;, Jean Bryson, Building Clerk; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. The meeting was called to order by Art Sorenson, Chairman, at 7:30 p.m. He reviewed the format that will be used during the Board of Adjustments meeting. Agenda Item #2 Approval of Minutes The minutes of the October 9, 1989, Board of Adjustments meeting were approved as presented. 6+ Motion: Bentley Second: Minder PON Ayes: Bentley, Minder, Sorenson, Johnson 680r Nays: None Abstentions: Downard and Stoner sW Approved: 4-0-2 Agenda Item #3 Administrative Comments !W No comments were made during this agenda item. Agenda Item #4 Case #74, Request made by Darr Equipment Co. Pq W A request for Special Exception Use for outside storage per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (tt) , for Block A, Lots 1A, 1B, 2 and Block B, Lots 7 & 8, Southlake Bank Place. Owner: Darr Equipment Company. Zoning: Industrial-1, Location: 350, 400, 401, Bank Street. Public Hearing. P" A presentation was made by Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, who stated she received one reply opposing the request. David McMahan stated he was opposed to outside storage for the acre across from L his property. H Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page two Agenda Item #4 Continued Mike Whitaker, 400 Bank Street, Southlake Stated they wish to store diesel fuel in the new tank. Lube tanks are already on the property, and they also have caterpillar engines on pallets stored outside. He stated the primary request is for outside storage in general. Darr Equipment is the sole tenant on the cul-de-sac, and, he stated they are interested in creating a clean operation. Larry Winberg, Darr Equipment, Southlake. He stated assembly is going on inside of the building. He stated he originally was going to ask for Lot 8, for the Special Exception Use, as that is where the outside storage is located. Motion was made to permit the applicant to withdraw Lot 7, Block A, (350 Bank Street) from the request. Motion: Minder Second: Johnson Ayes: Minder, Johnson, Sorenson, Downard, Bentley Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote (Stoner did not vote on this item) �..r' Joe Bentley stated he agrees with staff that there is not a requirement for screening or buffer yard in regards to this item. The applicants agree that they would have a fence placed on the location (following the line straight across to the existing fence). ' The public hearing resulted with no comments. Joe Bentley offered the findings, including: - requested a special use permit - location is the unimproved clearing - defined on the site plan - fence restriction as discussed it - the only condition is outside storage - hereafter be contained by a security fence Motion was made to grant the request for a Special Exception Use for outside storage, provided that the outside storage be secured with a security fence. It was determined that the exception is permitted by ordinance, the use is compatible, subject to fencing requirements. Motion: Bentley Second: Minder E i.► "' Ayes: Bentley, Minder, Downard, Sorenson, Johnson Nays: None �► Approved: 5-0 vote (Stoner did not vote on this item) Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page three Robert Downard stepped down for Agenda Items #5 & #6, as he is a property owner within 200'. Agenda Item #5. Case #75. Special Exception Use by Jerry Sutton Chairman Sorenson noted that Alternate 2, Bill Stoner will be asked to vote on agenda item #5 and #6 as Mr. Downard has stepped down. Special Exception Use for Family Quarters per Ordinance NO. 480, Section 44.12 (n) for B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tract 1A. Owner: Jerry Sutton. 14 to 9 Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator described the property and stated that seven property owners within 200' were notified. Mrs. Downard had questions in regards to the closeness of the septic system to her property. Lynn Sutton, 1202 Randol Mill Avenue Mrs. Sutton was present to answer questions for the board. She stated the O'Kelly residence is directly behind her house. Joe Bentley read from Section 44.12(n) of Ordinance No. 480, and stated the intent of the ordinance tends to explain the 30' behind the existing structure. Public Hearing: Doris Downard- Randol Mill Road She prefers that the house be built where the applicants plan to place it, as the front of her house is at the tree line. It would be better for her as a neighbor. Public hearing closed. Dennis Minder commented that with the tree line on the property, it would make sense to leave the proposed structure where the applicants want to build it. With the size of the structure, it may look like a pool house. Joe Bentley stated he interrupts the ordinance to read, "not visible from the street" is the objective, if it cannot be behind the principle structure. He would feel fencing must be brought up to standards. Ernest Johnson stated he feels two structures is not in the spirit of the ordinance. He suggests that the structures be attached. iM Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page four Agenda Item #5 Continued Chairman, Art Sorenson described the findings for the board: - preserve the single family neighborhood - one family, one lot - avoid the appearance of two families and two dwellings - 30' set back, they choose not to do this - adequate screening as not to be seen from the street - restrict the certificate of occupancy until in compliance Motion was made to approve the Special Exception Use, meeting the specifications in Ordinance No 480, Section 44.12(n), and the board's findings, to the satisfaction of the building official. Motion: Bentley Second: Stoner Ayes: Bentley, Stoner, Sorenson, Johnson, Minder Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote (not Downard) A five (5) minute recess was held at this time, returning ow-*% at 9:30 p.m. ✓ Agenda Item #6 Case #76 Request of Jerry Sutton Case #76, a request for a variance to maximum square footage (1,000 square foot) allowable for family quarters per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12(n). B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tract 1A, �* 1.003 acres of land. Owner: Jerry Sutton. Zoning: Single Family-lA. A presentation was made by Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator. Mrs. Lynn Sutton was present to answer questions for the board. She stated she did not tell the architect to make the dwelling 1,000 square feet, and it ended up over the limit. If corrections lrl will need to be made, they will do it through the builder, rather than going back to the architect. The public hearing resulted with no comments. Bill Stoner commented that he views the item as a hardship per Section 44.3(i) and the ability to grant change is within the authority of the board. 9 U Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page five Agenda Item #6 Continued Joe Bentley outlined the findings for the board: - failing health of occupant - specific circumstances Motion was made to grant the variance to the maximum square footage allowable for family quarters per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (n) . Motion: Bentley Second: Minder Ayes: Bentley, Minder, Johnson, Stoner Nays: Sorenson: Approve: 4-1 vote. Sorenson opposed the motion on the basis of applicant's actions (Section 44.3(b)(1) (c) minimum variance. Bill Stoner requested being excused for the remainder of the meeting as he is an alternate and will not act on any other items tonight. Robert Downard returned to the table for the remainder of the meeting. Agenda Item #7 Case #77 Request for Variance by Gilliland's. Request for a variance to side yard requirement in Agricultural District per Ordinance No. 480, Section 9.5(c). James L. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 348, Tract 2B1A, 2.00 acres of land. Owner: Jerry and Patricia Gilliland. Zoning: Agricultural. Mrs. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated that ten letters were sent to property owners within 200'. She received four responses, in favor. Patricia Gilliland, applicant, 680 East Dove Road. Mrs. Gilliland was present for the meeting to answer questions for r+ the board. She explained the lay out of her property, and that the request was for a carport. They will build either a detached or an attached carport, if the variance is granted. Dennis Minder stated he walked the with Mrs. Gilliland, property �+ and it would not be conducive to move the carport further back. Joe Bentley stated he talked with the applicants and they indicated they prefer an attached carport. He feels it would be the preferred way to go, and, with the proposed location, it is the "M only suitable location. 0 Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page six Agenda Item #7 Continued Robert Downard had the same concerns as Bentley, and he agrees with his conclusions. Art Sorenson noted that he and Mrs. Gandy jointly viewed the site, and encouraged other members to invite the Zoning Administrator for on site visits for the purpose of orientation or clarification as personal schedules may allow. A variance and waiver would be qualified with definitions. The public hearing resulted with no comments. Joe Bentley presented the findings for the board: - that special circumstances do exist - that the request falls within the interpretations of the ordinance. Motion was made to approve the request for variance based upon the findings of the board, to include attaching the structures. Motion: Bentley Second: Minder Ayes: Bentley, Minder, Downard, Sorenson, Johnson Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item # 8. Case #78 Request for Variance to Min. PUD Acreage A request for variance to the minimum acreage requirement in residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) per Ordinance No. 480, Section 30.3. Property located in the S.H. Thompson Survey, Abstract NO. 1504, Tracts 3 and 4A. A 42.625 acre tract of land. Owner: Continental Joint Venture. Zoning: Agricultural. A presentation was made by Karen Gandy, who stated she sent out ten notices to property owners within 2001. She received no responses. 0" Kirk Williams, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas ko Mr. Williams stated that they are requesting a variance to the minimum acreage of 50 acres, in order to have the opportunity and ., the flexibility to apply for the Planned Unit Development Zoning District. They feel they need the flexibility of a PUD in order to iw address all their concerns in regards to the project. Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page seven Agenda Item #8 Continued Art Sorenson reminded the board that the PUD request is a minimum of 50 acres according to ordinance 480, Section 30.3. The applicant has asked that the board consider the variance, allowing for 42.625 acres in the PUD. The applicant must show why the variance should be given with the understanding that granting of variance would be conditional on subsequent zoning approval by the City. Public Hearing Bob Goode, Goode Airport, Southlake He is concerned that the lots are so small and may devalue the area. Roger Bohanan, owns property south of Big Bear Creek. Have the developers attempted to purchase additional land in order to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. Betsy Shatley, Tex -Art Stone Company Commented that because it is under the flight pattern, it should s1 normally reduce the useable residential and recreational area further. Mr. Williams stated they want to show the unique features of the land. The plan shows land that would be donated to the city as a j soccer field. They want flexibility and the ability to address it properly. They are not asking for lot size, etc., they just want the flexibility. They want the opportunity to work under a PUD. After their case was not approved by the City Council, they met with the Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney and other staff members, and they looked at how the 50 acre minimum was arrived at, and their was nothing magical about it, but it was a number that felt right and was large enough that some unique things could be worked out. Art Sorenson stated that the applicant says that this sort of development is what a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to be made of. Joe Bentley stated he feels the burden of proof is on the applicant to prove this is a unique land. He reminded the Commission, as they discuss whether or not this land is suitable for PUD, they must also consider whether or not PUD is the only use for this land. The city staff as he sees it, is not in a position to approve or disapprove applications made to it, but rather it is in a position to decide how the application should be handled and whether or not the application is complete. Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, 1989 page eight Agenda Item 8 Continued Those are the administrative functions. He feels it is an unappropriate item for the Board of Adjustments to consider. Bentley went on to say that there are twenty-two possible zoning categories in the ordinance, and he fails to see that the district they want and do not qualify for, constitutes a hardship. Mr. Williams restated that based on the fact that they were denied a request for zoning, the City Attorney, City Manager, etc., advised that the matter must be taken to the Board of Adjustments. Art Sorenson reviewed the board's comments to this point, noted Mr. Bentley's question of jurisdiction, and asked the following questions from the chair: "may we consider the request for variance for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) of less than 50 acres as presented this evening in Case 78". Motion: Sorenson Second: Johnson Ayes: Sorenson, Johnson, Minder Nays: Bentley and Downard Approved: 3-2 vote Motion was then made to continue the public hearing on November 14, 1989 at 7:30 p.m., as a representative of the City Attorney's office was not present, and city staff will need to ascertain legal opinions and report to the meeting. Motion: Johnson Second: Downard Ayes: Johnson, Minder, Sorenson, Bentley and Downard. Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. Board of Adjustments Meeting Continued November 14, 1989 7:30 P.M. iw MEMBERS PRESENT: Art Sorenson, Chairman; Ernest Johnson, Robert Downard members, and, Alternate 1, Dennis Minder and Alternate 2, Bill Stoner. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Curtis Hawk, City Manager; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. Agenda Item #8, Continued (From November 13, 1989) ! Art Soreness, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. and reviewed the actions taken on November 13, 1989 during the regular meeting. u i Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, and November 14, 1989 page nine Agenda Item #8 Continued Mr. Sorenson noted that the question of whether or not a 3/2 vote on an item would allow it to go forward, was answered by the City Attorney in an opinion which was received as the result of last night's meeting. The City Attorney's opinion received stated that the board could have continued on the administrative issue with a 3/2 vote. A copy of the legal opinion is incorporated into the minutes of this meeting. Bill Dahlstrom, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas. He stated they are not here to request a zoning of PUD, only to ask for the opportunity to apply for PUD zoning with less than 50 acres of land. They believe with this variance, it will enable them to i preserve the trees, and also allow for open space. The real issue is to look at the site all together; airport, school, flood plain area, size of the tract, industrial to the west. iThey believe that the PUD is available to other properties with similar use, granting of this privilege will not set them aside for something others do not have the opportunity to have. They believe that if the City Council does not feel it is the best use for the site, they can deny it, but the applicants want the chance to apply. rr� Mr. Sorenson asked the applicants which of the items addressed last night make the property unique. They answered, all of the conditions make it a unique property and reason for PUD zoning. Mr. Sorenson asked them to highlight the key findings. They answered, topography, vegetation, proximity to landing pattern, industrial to the west, school, public policy to encourage open space. Mr. Sorenson asked, if the city would not allow them to apply for a PUD, would it create a hardship? Would the hardship be in not being able to realize density yield on the site? Mr. Williams stated the perfect example is, they are looking for Ali 6 the flexibility of being able to provide for park site, and have yield with PUD-- it provides open space. It provides the amenity of school site, and, that flexibility is what they need. The PUD allows them to provide for the issues; open space, park for public, not having to put lots in critically designated areas, the PUD allows them to address issues with density yield. Mr. Kirk Williams stated the perfect example is, they are looking Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, and November 14, 1989 look page ten Agenda Item #8 Continued Robert Goode- Goode Airport, 1080 S. Peytonville Avenue, Southlake. He would like to show the board why reduction from 50 acres to lesser acreage would not benefit the welfare of the public. The reduction from 50 acres is a problem, as it will be more density. The density being heavier is not good for the welfare of the people who will live there. He objects to the reduction. Betsy Shatley- Tex Art Stone Company She stated four (4) points of objection: 1) The developer had contacted her in November, and was aware in February, 1989 of the issues around the property. 2) To grant a variance would be setting precedent. 3) An easement on her property has been indicated and she gave no permission. 4) To build a home near her plant would devalue the property of the homeowner. I", 600 Tom Mathews with Dixtor International. Mrs. Shatley is correct, when she was trying to sell her property. All the comments have their place, but its with the P&Z and not here tonight. They would like to incorporate the comments in the plan but must have approval for the variance tonight. The comments must be addressed. Dennis Minder -Alternate 1. The only reason the applicants gave for hardship is to grant park land to the city. Ernest Johnson- Member He believes that when the City Council set the PUD at 50 acres it was arbitrary, and it was their right to do so. He feels the board should consider if they can arbitrarily reduce the 50 acres in the PUD. He believes the Board of Adjustments does not have the right to change the ordinance from 50 acres as stated. Robert Downard- Member He believes it would grant a favor to this group to allow a variance. At the time of adoption of the ordinance, no opposition was made to the 50 acre minimum for PUD Zoning District. Bill Stoner- Alternate 2 He cannot find a hardship here at all, based on what has been shown on this case. Art Sorenson, chairman, stated the board must find that special conditions exist and that the applicant should not be deprived of rights of other property owners of the same size property, less than 50 acres. Sorenson read from the ordinance, page 44-1 and 44-2. Board of Adjustments Minutes November 13, and November 14, 1989 page eleven Agenda Item #8 Continued Motion was made, asking the questions, "shall a variance be granted to the minimum acreage requirement in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District, in Ordinance No. 480, Section 30.3" Motion: Minder Second: Downard Ayes: Sorenson Nays: Minder, Downard, Stoner, Johnson Approved: 1-4 vote (to deny). 1-4 vote (to deny) The meeting was adjourned by Mr. Sorenson at 8:30 p.m. Art o nson, Chairman Board of Adjustments ATTFST: Sandra L . LeGrand .# �• +�,��''� City Secretary ���`':;• '•• .,+,'s 3*,r .mac w• 41 r • : 47 j• E-. w �V) u:n d H -9 c A z � r Cr � g 4-3 NIJ a a, a� a � w z a 1 ,�, off w, '.� :. I THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF I,� AU ZWKPI2P as a member of the -73Pt make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and/or a person or persons related to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote or decision of the as those terms are defined in Chapter 171, Texas Local Government Code. The business entity is (name and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. � Funds received from the business entity Y exceed 10% ON of gross income for the previous year. 0) property Realis involved and �✓ x have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the v business entity or property that would be affected G by a decision of the public body of which I am a member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm �i that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter �+ whatsoever. Signed this ` J day of ��� 19 i L Signature of official � Title �r�rr�rrrrurr�rrrirr _. __ _ _. .. BEFOR ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared and on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of knowledge or belief. Swor to and subscribed to before me on this /J? day of 1 go Y- Notary Public in and for the State of Texas i& lu6 6yal7d,,) My Commission Expires: fv, M� zu- Type/Print Notary's Name rrr w W I" di 4 40 4M AN am do +m 40 im FIELDING, BARFFTT, HUNTER & TA%,L.OR CARVAh E ADKINS ATTORNEYS N1P+ R. BARABI I" 300 WLSTGRN NA110NAL BLMITNO !IZADE'lliELAM885i D FIELDING IR(;1iWAY 80 WCST NN GIDFL FOk1 WORnIJE-XAS76110,1969 RAIC IIARRIOPR D HITT TL..u:PHC?NE NO, (817) 560-0303 tSAyNp HAEL B. HUNTER FAx (817) 560.3953 AN E. HUTCHISON SUSAN S IONRS YNE K. OLSON SRAVLA rO Am-p.N TAYLOR, JR. BOARD CERTIFIED PERSONAL INJURY TREAL LAW TEXAS ROARri OP LQOAL SPECLALIZAIION tICOUNSEL ATOR i1UGH Q. PARMER 1 DATE: DELIVER TO: FIRM: CITY.-_ TELE'0P`,' NUMBER FROM: 10`�` TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER RAGE ADDITIONAL, MESSAGES: OUR TELECOPY NUMBER: 817-560-3953 CLIENT NAME: _ �- '� (� CLIENT NUMBER: _ ,r- -1�� PERSON TRANSMITTING: IF THEME IS A PROBLEM IN TRANSMISSION PLEASE CALL 817-560-0303. r F FiF-i, 7ING, BARPra, HUNTER & TAYWR CARMAN E Aiwwt DANII-1, R. BAP RPTT* ELIZARI' I'll ELAM DA V 1u FIE�L+OINO E. 01.FNN Cw]DPI. WM. CCRAIO HARRICRR DW AY N E D. IL CT M(CIIAFL a. HUNTER SUSAw E. HUTCHISON SUSAN S. IONE: WAYNE K. O1sON Tim r. SRALL.A E. ALLEN TAYLOR, IR *BOARD CERT1b1FD PERSONAL INWRY TRIAL I.AW TEXAQ ROARD OP LECIAL lPECIALLLATION OP COUMML S9NATOR HuoH Q PARMFR VIA FAX ATTORNEYS 1Uo %TSTURN NATIONAI. BUILDING 8851 HIGHWAY go WEST FOR, W0R714,'1TXA576116 1969 November 14, 1989 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of 5outhlake 667 North Carroll Avenue southlake, Texas 76092 Re: 'In"Hot,'F No. (817) 560-0303 FAx (817) 560-3953 Dear Curti This :setter is in response to- your request for a legal opinion on the following matters: 1, ,sue: Does the Board of Adjustment have the competency and jurisdiction to vote on whether or not a variance may be granted as to the minimum lot size of a PUD? My opinion is that the Board of Adjustment does have the competency and jurisdiction to vote on such a question. Section 211.009(a)(3) states that the Board of Adjustment may "authorize, in specific cases, a variance from the terms of the zoning ordinance if the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of the ordinance is preserved and substantial substance is done." Although the Board must make specific findings of hardship under this provision, it is a broad grant of authority, authorizing the Board to allow variances from any term of the zoning ordinance. The Local Government Code does not prevent the Board of Adjustment from voting on the above issue. Section 44.3(b) of the Southlake Zoning Ordinance outlines when and under what conditions the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance. In general, the zoning ordinance tracks the lanouage of the Local Government Code. The Board of Adjustment may "authorize, in specific cases, variances rrom L.H1a Lei1ris of thin Ordinance ." The Board of Adjustment is not limited by the zoning ordinance as to under what terms of the ordinance variances may be granted. I am assuming that proper notice of the public Mr. Curtis Hawk *� November 14, 1989 Page 2 hearing was given fifteen (15) days in advance as required by Section 44.3(b) (4) . Section 44.6 limits the authority of the Board of Adjustment "to grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under the germs of this ordinance in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this ordinance in said district." I don't believe this provision applies to the present issue. I understand that there was some confusion as to whether or not a fifteen percent waiver of the required yard area complicated the issue of jurisdiction to hear a variance in this case. Section 44.11 of the Southlake Zoning ordinance deals with waiver of mandatory yard and setback requirements. This Section does not impact on whether or not the Board has authority to grant a variance. This Section applies only when "such a waiver is necessary due to a surveying or construction error in the placement of the original foundation or site improvement." Without this provision, such an error would require a variance. The purpose of Section 44,11 is to grant a waiver, without the necessity for a variance, when. an error in construction or suvreying has resulted in non-compliance with the terms of the zoning ordinance. Section 44.11 does not apply, and need not be- con:'idered, while considering whether or not to grant a pre -construction variance. ilwr When the Board of Adjustment considers whether or not to grant a variance, it is important that their vote be based on the merits of the issue at hand, and not on a jurisdictional question. The Board should grant or deny the variance based on specific criteria and findings as outlined in section 44.3(b). 2, seas: What is the standard that must be applied to determine whether or not a variance may be granted as to the minimum size of a PUa? The Board of Adjustment must ,rake the following findings: (a) The Board of Adjustment shall make findings that the j requirements of this Section have been met by an applicant for a variance (Section 44.3(b)(5)). The Board of Adjustment must make a finding that literal enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. In detex:mining this, the Board must agree that the applicant has successfully demonstrated all of the requirements set out in r Section 44.3(1). (b) The Board of Adjustment shall make a finding that the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure (Section 44.3(b)(6)). Mr. Curtis Hawk November 14, 1989 Page 3 (c) The Board of Adjustment shall further make a finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare (Section 44.3(b)(7)). Cif-/ (COLD ZY L will only reach As you are aware, the Bea the issue of whether or not to approve the PUD if the variance is granted. If the Board fails to grant the variance? not consider whether or not to approve the PUD. 74o�d�.e I hope this adequately answers your inquiries. if you have any additional questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Betsy Elam EAE/kt C:\slake\ltrelam.17 F DEAR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMWrS AND CITY STAFF: 'rrr� n 11-11 IN F MY NAME IS BETSY SHATLEY. I OWN TEX-ART STONE & PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS "A TRACT OF LAND IN THE S. H. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. #1504 AND THE L. A. CLAY SURVEY, ABST. #346, IN SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. MY PROPERTY AND BUSINESS ARE ADJOINING THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DIXTOR INTERNATIONAL( CONTINENTAL JOINT VENTURE) is applying FOR A VARIANCE TO THE 50 ACRES PUD REOUIFTMENT, BEFORE THEY HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR ZONING BY THE CITY. I WISH TO BRING UP 4 POINTS OF OBJEC'!'ION ON MY PART FOR POSSIBLE DISCUSSION BY THE BOARD. THE FIRST POINT BEING THAT DIXTOR INTERNATIONAL HAD CONTACTED ME AS EARLY AS NOVVE BER 1988, EXPRESSING THEIR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY IN THE AREA, SPECIFICALLY THE TRACT THEY NOW OWN ADJOINING MY PROPERTY - - AS WELL AS MY PROPERTY. I HAVE DOCUMUATION, THAT February 8, 1989, THEY WOULD BE UNDERGOING A FEASIBILITY AND ENGINEERING STUDY OF THE AREA OF BOTH PROPERTIES. I FEEL THAT DIXTOR WAS AWARE BY AT LEAST FEBRUARY, 1989, OF THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THEIR PROPERTY, MAINLY, THE EXISTANCE OF TEX-ART STONE AND OUR TYPE OF OPERATION, GOODE AIRPORT AND THE FLIGHT PATH, THE FLOOD PLAIN, AND CARROLL F'rFUARY SCHOOL. I BELIEVE ONE FULL YEAR IS AMPLE TIME TO CONSIDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES. THE SECOND POINT IS THAT TO GRANT THIS VARIANCE WOULD BE SETTING A PRECEDENCE FOR FUTURE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS. THE RATIO OF LAND VARIANCE FROM THE 50 ACRES I BELIEVE IS AS HIGH AS 25%, MUCH HIGHER THAN THE RECOMtMMATION OF NO MORE THAN 10% VARIANCE. THE THIRD POINT IS THAT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AS EASEMENT ON MY PROPERTY HAS BEEN INDICATED. I HAVE NOT GRANTED DIXTOR PERMISSION FOR SUCH AN EASEMENT. THE FOURTH POINT IS THAT UNDER A FLIGHT PATH, THE OBJECT IS TO KEEP OUT CONGESTION OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. TO SUMMARIZE, A HOME BUILT NEAR A PLANT SUCH AS MINE WOULD DIMINISH THE VALUE OF THE HOME AND THE LAND FOR THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE. I DO NOT OBJECT TO HOMES BEING BUILT IN THE AREA, BUT NEXT TO MY PLANT, WOULD NOT BE SUITABLE. I HAVEN'T BR4Uar THESE POINTS UP TO BE UNREMCNABLE, RATHER TO POINT OUT POSSIBLE COMPLAINTS AND PROBLEMS FOR THE CITY, MYSELF AND MR GOODE IN THE FUTURE. I BELIEVE A BUFFER OF SOME TYPE OF C:on ERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE BEST. , THANK YOU, w rr.. r +rrr.rrrirrr�rrrrr... City of Southiake, Texas a- IM Ili 6 MEMORANDUM[ November 8, 1989 TO: Board of Adjustment Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Case #74 Board of Adjustment Case z 74 is a request for a Special Exception Use to allow outside storage per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (tt). The request is made by Darr Equipment Company. The location of the establishment is 350, 400, 401 Bank Street, being legally described as Block A, Lots 1A, 1B, and 2 and Block B, Lots 7 and 8, Southlake Bank Place. The current zoning is Industrial-1. Properties to the South and East are within the City of Grapevine. Properties to the North and West are Industrial-1 also; properties to the Northeast are Commercial-3. There were seven (7) property owners within 200 feet who were notified. Th date, there has been one (1) response from David McMahan, representative of Lake Properties Development, was opposed to outside storage at 350 Bank Street across from their property. CITY OF SOUIELASR 667 N. Call Avenue Southlake, Texas r +7rW MTn n/1ATIn fVO AT1 7TTnf�lr�7r[� RIPIJEST FOR APPEAL NAME: Darr Equipment Co. FEE: SW.00 ADDRESS: P.O. Box 540788, Dallas. Texas 75354-07RR �I M. TfIm INUSER: 214 / 7 21- 2 9 3 8 LOCATION OF APPEAL: (address/legal description) 350, 400 & 401 Bank St. Lots 1 & 2 Block A and Lots 7 & 8 Block B of Southlake Bank Place. REASON FOR APPEAL: (describe in detail) �i (Please see attached letter) �r Ali IIATE: Octobe 1989 e SIWATURE: Larry Winberg, Facities Manager CASE NO.: 13cwr-d of Ad;ustment 11- DARR EQUIPMENT CQ P.O. Box 540788 Dallas, Texas 75354-0788 (214) 721-2000 October 16, 1989 City of Southlake Zoning Board of Adjustments 667 North Carroll Avenue _ Southlake, Texas 76092 Ladies and Gentlemen: 111" Darr Equipment Co. requests the Zoning Board of Adjustments grant special exception use status for the property owned by Darr Equipment Co. to allow outside storage. This re- quest is necessitated by our need to relocate and improve an above ground diesel fuel storage tank and is inclusive of the need for general outside storage. (We presently have legal non -conforming status.) it We also ask that the requirements for bufferyards and screen- ing be waived for the following reasons: ,. 11*N Imo'' 1. Our property is bounded by Grapevine City limits to the south and east. 2. Our property is located at the terminating end of Bank Street. 3. Our property is bounded by properties, in Commerce Business Park, of like zoning classification to the west with ground contours and a scrub tree line which provide screening. 4. Additional screening along the fence line facing Bank Street and the fence line abutting properties in Commerce Business Park would be detrimental to the overall security of our property and buildings. We would appreciate deliberation of the this request at the earliest opportunity. Respe lly, Larry Winberg, ,�. Facilities Mana r Dallas • Ft. Worth 0 Longview • Sherman/Denison • Texarkana 0 Tyler • Waco 9 Wichita Falls ' Laor LAKE N y am p G ' GRAPEVINE f • t ''y' d me JONES At M0 1 ►OSfUr N/uow = t lIUK IN 2 REInRI LN��s'•�"� t S SERVER" • 4 WAR S CRANE I _ N. 3• ` —1 T--{ CRA1 EIAL LostTINICSAMD OAKS \ — 1 �.• ��� .• >Y SONTR USE�,� • �����e.aie.+ilrsr���a.e.�a.. 'DISTRICT 30UN0 . �A ' a Y l soQTRUI� x �ea an POOR ON 1 touaxEM 1 1 : CRESCENT • :- yRtLOR A SLUE TtC-. s - S SOUTIILARE rlLs Z I I wI03lAM r W u 1 LAKES 3VtIRArfNRIE- 11A ! tLLLTO► M i ; Wp � ■ ANi��� AYE L00► P' __ •»�.. ' A Z. EI W FUx • ,_ . MEMAOLsa= ::.�TEr00,; TRR 7s • . 3 s s �� s "tT1.OR ST -3�L����.r���� +cC*l5T W Y OENE Ci � _ �.'\�p' .� r*Rc'utT�f � E i S►9F -iu; (,(�• E�ms.. -- 2 UAE �7 . ''.T DOVES: r CARROII IouN _ LN • i NIGH SCNOOL `•� = �• p. r,� „� i v ! i.� 2 f 4` r 1 0- NA; OR 4C! MOCuaiIMO IN � ' :! s - .. • � s s' � Z :ALE lx ,.�tIRIT2A.f CT ` s s i e ! TiwiENCT'-r� S r�%P.-AEST U rRIMR05E Li -Z •46 '� - „•. �'loFl( N�ic SUMMIT SIMSE A Sw'nfNORE OR < - - �f*.,tEE�-'Si; ` : S :Aa:.NAL CT 31 �_ OIKVNf- i i Y ♦ a ., e + Ky, FTA:i•At•. • s W► +•{ -SIDE ' v U•cf chmwCK e G fA. pp 0 0 =ieST CT .j�•4tQy = �� d, Y a I a Sr I + 02LEWEEC im YEtt Iyr R I i ,p •s a CNORN TaTEO t u •�xEfFIELO S:� �`- +�, JACK 0. JOHNSON! a t: • aWAS C 1 !� �] ELEMENTART+i _ q ir' N100E KKNLMIO SL W s •+CHINO St. E - V, ! i^:::A*TON � s Gl• � .>E r.sR •• .i����` �•_4`LCA ! `OOYECREEr'- 2ASrENw000?Nt CARROLL T IROWNSTONE::R A MIDDLE - I ILLCA4-LE* S R a IROWNSTONE{' 'eis �'••s �, 'V0� rI101N0 - SCNOOI - s91100N Ir000a S Ro::ROSSt16 a AOOW + ^ko a v i KrMtO } GLEM esi, ` JKE'f10C 4� - 6LEN� WISSI,LLN Ill •e ` • `ems •iAEEN °CN OA I `�ir . COVE,,COVE,,LOVE REROT a ,�F ''' 3 as i j RG.rAc • {�� - WO w 1006E SIYI S► : e HALL IA s_ .� y y • R o `va a BICENTENNIAL s ,N!-S 1T ` *m" mm a% PARILU-O% J \/ W.-f0UTN4tE fLVO. w I fOIITMARE fLVD_ E ' _ 1 a�a.as722 \INAU ST • s ^OOOE ,FERN e 5 s plot E �£ o�� iat�A7 ^• s •: - :: 61. uLlc ; _ - !pQ SITE _ ► i i` e s+iyr EACNANCEiI` , •� L AS�w ;s • RAINBOW sli r� 1 LVO SPE*m _ _ W 1� r: • 2 NEATHEI JtR . _ < ty 1 L • . • s CREL ` •• . A x0uT3 rs — � CONTINENTALILVO.w CONTNENTAIILYD.=� •• •• Ily 7 T W *4111S a i"'.,NY NABS: / • '• • mo.INS • r r - IiVJV/ILJ l 1.l�LiG +4`r.'.c _-'I'=•- { ,�Z '• its 1 25 • . li 12 0 to .=z — -- — \ � 683 ! 714 La a � _� 2 LLS 30R 3 3p6Z� .6?P A 1 043 Q G C o \ _94 AC T 3C1 26R - --- --- t.165 AC t 335 9 �- .53 AC f TR A6 f TR 3C TR 39 2 9 AC TR 8 �! 31 7 TA 3C3 f 5 263 AC 6.46 It 1-2 e 175 e { r A 32 1 KELLEFR AD • 2 GRO'EV1NE 1 AC t t �A � 501 96osN $/ J.R. Stacy Camiercial-3 2 D � � Southlake Assoc. o i I-1 5 I�� EASTYA t.'P AC U 2 _S�aVA J.R. Stacy Bank St.J.V. 12 P5 AL 5 AC North Texas Bank 6 3 I-1 t t 1 AC I-1 y i Lake Properties Dev. i 36 AC m .55 AC 6 A 3 J.R. Stacy Grapevine City I- 4 400 401 Limits TA AL .5 AC .26 AC E T 3 5 6 J.R. Stac 'GRApE`�IN pAp 6065 I-1 ; --- 7-- PAi p 4R1 S J.R.Stacy , SINES 6 Q AR ? ?AP I M I-1 N 1s52 W ' z Mu J.R.Stac M 6 W 1 5 Z I ----- "- 1A 6, isa t �781 A.; ' J.R.Stacy F � 9 I-1 , Grapevine City CHANGE BLVD. _ r 7c J.R.Stac 7 Limits - i - D i I-1 .34r- AC 7A w 'snap Investments, Inc. F Grapevine City,ul l II City of Southlake, Texas M E V 0 R A N D U M November 8, 1989 TO: Board of Adjustment Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Case #75 i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i Board of Adjustment Case # ?5 is a request for a Special Exception Use for Family Quarters per Section 44.12 (n) in Ordinance No. 480. The request is made by Jerry Sutton. He wants to construct a separate dwelling for his parents due to his father's failing health. A six (6) foot stockade fence totally encloses the property. The location of the property is 1202 Randol Mill Avenue, being legally described as B. J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tract 1A. The current zoning is Single Family-1A. ! There were seven (7) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no inquiries or responses. KPG CITY OF SOUIBLAIM 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS RBQIJESr FOR APPEAL SPEC O\L ExCEF1IOA U 5E #150.02) NAME: — Z ftj FEE: MzO@ ADDRESS: t- m / e- L TEE NOMER: l7 - 5`t 3o LOCATION OF APPEAL: (address/legal description) ��1�} I��L %�%!�-L ,_ I Cake �C. l . 003 Q�LY�'25 t ►rl � �1 P �- Suz�eyB�1c7" 5/9 REASON FOR APPEAL: (describe in detail) T' y PPtZmj55, o+v % L _0AJsT7Z"C� )9 �Y1 l I F+�i-1-/fF N- 14 c.T/•+ (5 I d/ 44 .y cr �,, .,, )- 'Q tON)�r-2 48Lt= Ta YY7&/OT 7fA-) 1713 P/ZESFA.)T` H0m WE AAJ7TI C. i Pr9-77--- 4 517Z4-,of-7-10•J L J/f/= lz (jz- CL,O5 C� r S 1� f> j= = t+ m / L.0 t'S r rrn i�yTZT/tA-)T F. / /f/ S u.) F <- `�� t�E2Tc1. t tN S LN-J P-L- LI O (r- 0 K_ m f n DATE: SICTIATUE: CASE DU.: OmrA cf AJ'lusimeni * q5 MR WISIPM LW TROPHY CLUB _ WESTLAKE " I EJclfir = ` DENTON COUNTY ' TARR OUNTY-- ' DISTatC r sours Ir !{1p ws{11 LA VIS (K TEp 's T= 3Tii s ici4�i CLLER l SAN J JL'T►11AJ °'MV.E^' = GRAPEVINE !$. a . - - tOI JONES l0. - ; � JOMES - I 1 POSSUM NOLUw 2 IEOOIRO LN 51 R SOOSE - NECK a\ 2'il= s �» S i- 52 1 SwAN �.s II $ � •� 1= ` 1 / S CNANE .SI ` e Roll Roll s �/ W Z.IASS DO ^plum, TROUT ' � + slln I CAA//IE1AAll LANE s l s THOUSAND OAKS � t r•--w wwwwwr Rw----j--ENV`------�- " •=SODTNLI[E ,HAIOW KAN[ ,� ti 1 i ! /IL E = W: LAIIESIOE =e \ '.�♦NOR OR o aR1AN IN l . + I an } a � NRIIOY' ~f��f a 3e % I NKLSIOF 01 -� t s ZIEAt w1NfiITGi a _ L� i CRESCENT ON "Boo S SOUTNLAKE" 1S ANO w ON NKWMIORSMEET R IIDF TEAL CT z Ci - 1 IURIEY < WI `u _ W 111 ` ST �rP . --'OKRA-YELL 0 a Ef Fr' - ON RO =1— -' ' W f ` J 0u Am i t e G Y} '2 A u OENE CT I< TAno.!ST e -, i 3 ' OOYfA-E -.� ___ OOYE ST. w -- _ F. EAIEIIALOCIOI <1 -w ww. -r� 4011N .c �Q - CARROLL ! S y� U LN; ' Him SCHOOL 1 2 �j . - • , MOCKIM611N0 LN-MTran, Clci _ '' sue„ e� �. �! a i • ►NIMROSE LA s� �y1' I 1' SIEa►Y ROELON 0�7� . W 3 -�LNAY� � 4 CT `� I WNIC[ Ll"�_ "' 2 T"BLEWEEO 3 `-CS►MSS QFE[ ._ us i IiGIS/ERIN{�i LN TA ! j 7 LONGHORN 1 tiNSNONt ip : REST lh o% ! !„ < JACK 0. JONN3O $ " N 1 tlNirii CT - E s RIDDEN f 6l EN •^ .` _ .8 s _ �1DNLN-NO ST, w - __-_ __ ELEMENTARY KhtANO ST. E--` '�-�'�i ��� _ ta[NuplE C M EIS CANYON _.`�� Nis ,. ' FAWKES AO ` �KINIi5W 600 / ppflpO0•' N -i �, e ` �� '' <;�_ Fd7ftl.OSS TINOEN'S AIYEN�2 DOVE CREEDI i I •--------�\ r�Lr ♦ �y CARROLL MIDDLE - \ 7 MFADON f S' �LDwo10 NL SCHOOL 7q a P�� `• !� -_ TLOmEN[E_ 40 ' GLEN MVI? anLt[Ewo�000 �j v� i e dA OTN GLEN COVE-- i1 LIVE HENRY CT Oxus I •+ b M' GUM iR / i NILLSIO(Li (W f� n LODGE 'SAN SAS `z v' ,_<,. ` ■ i »� NYO u 9 CITT' 111 3 < z o HAIL » �1 Y 1 KICEPNIAIARK� sY01 -�a j JONNSIN RO • } e I70I �z; "` SOUTNLAKE NYO- w 3 - ►� ,s smell%t' 114E GOOOEFINE Ci. E CTGREENW000elii�R s CONTINENTAL IlYO-w 3 » ROIL ��'t �ci:lo f g; a : MART •+ = Ist o �� r Ai{�IT� ..31 t _ COLLEYVILLE OLVD.. E iY , NOOw if CGNTINENTAL KVO-E NAT-ST .- _ • --a! mu auM ,q 10 TR.607J1 .56 Ac TR.607J .78 Ac TR.6070 I I TR. , 607K TR.6D 2.11 Ac TA. IC 1 Ac TR.607L TR.607P TR.607N .92 Ac F AWKES RD I 3,11 Dawnard TR. 608V TR.608W TR.608X 92 A .92 Ac .92 Ac TR ZAI 3 TR.6A2A 3.84 Ac i I! TR.6A2 1.6 Ac Within Keller City Limits TR.6A 17.26 Ac 3 Ace 2R31Ac II I TR.IG3 i i 1.91 Ac i I I I I I TR.1E 2.1 Ac PT.TR 16 ' AG AG B/ O'Kelley R. TR.IA2 1 I Ac SF-1 5 6 7 retti Reznik Hale- Moore ES'� I 2R L M a N� �35g3 SF-1 SF-1 SF-1 SF 1 — TR.IG4 TR.28 15 Ac TR.2A 12 Ac �ro�e,�� L�� w,cY,s; 0�5 ao�3` x ao8' C � A � l� o c. � I � � 1�1�� �, 5� ww, �M k. Athletic stadiums, public or private, when located adjacent to a thoroughfare or collector street. 1. Fish hatcheries and fish farms. M. Public governmental buildings including community health centers and recreation buildings, libraries, museums, postal stations, and administrative offices of federal or state government. n. Servants or family quarters for domestic servants employed on the premises or family members of the owner of the premises and shall not be rented or otherwise used as a separate domicile provided the gross inhabitable square, 'footage of the floor area shall hot exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. Such quarters may be housed within the principal resid-ential dwelling, above a residential garage, or be part of an accessory building on the same premises, and shall comply with " � minimum standards for light, health, ilr safety and occupancy in conformance with other applicable City Codes and Ordinances. If the quarters exist as a separate accessory building to the principal dwelling, such qua— ers must be located at a distance of at least thirty (30) feet behind the principal dwelling, or not be visible from the street; in addition, such quarters must share a common street access with the principal dwelling. All utilities must be on the same meter as the �* principal dwelling. A separate septic rr system from the principal dwelling is required if the quarters are housed other than in the principal dwelling. AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-2OA, SF-2OB, MF-1, and MF-2 AG, I-2 All AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30 44-3 9 A X. Public, semi-public and private ALL parks; recreation and open space including playgrounds, parkways, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, botanical gardens, pedestrian paths, bicycle paths, equestrian bridle trails, nature centers, bird and wildlife sanctuaries. y. Temporary construction and/or ALL sales offices, including manufactured housing, only during actual construction for a period not to exceed two (2) years and located on property being developed. 34.2 ACCESSORY BUILDING - The following regulations shall govern the location and use of any accessory building: a. No accessory building shall be erected closer than five (5) feet to a property line located in the rear yard. b. No accessory building shall be erected within ten (10) feet of any other building, except that detached residential garages may be located no closer than five (5) feet to the main dwelling. .r+ C. No accessory building shall be constructed upon a lot until the construction of the principal building or use has actually been commenced, and no accessory building shall be used unless the main building in a lot is completed and used. d. No accessory building shall be used for dwelling purposes other than by domestic servants employed entirely on the premises or by family members and only in compliance with individual district regulations. EM 34-6 City of Southlake, Texas W km MR im M E M O R A N D U M November 8, 1989 TO: Board of Adjustment Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Case #76 Board of Adjustment Case # 76 is a request for a variance to the maximum square footage (1000 square feet) allowed for family quarters in Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12. The request is made by Jerry Sutton. His building plans indicate 1064 square feet. The location of the property is 1202 Randol Mill Avenue. The current zoning is Single Family-1A. There were seven (7) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no inquiries or responses. KPG CITY OF SOUIIff.AU 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas NAME: : $50.00 ADDRESS: IZ-A'v-w L / ` / j NUMBER:�� LOCATION OF APPEAL: (address/legal description) (��� � ly�o � �� LC Ct-r-res, n S' P C5ie r S)ry c 19 E4frkc_-F- 'tt_ 514 REASON FOR APPEAL: ( describe in detail) DATE: I f -)-- I I — SIGNATURE: CASE NO.: Board cJ Ad X Q 5tm�n� !E 1G Q • frr � VHt © E<YL x � rn tEAUE ZYr1 ' IM WA-fs' r--- , � I CjiFi1RL10t•) f� � i �� i . �. 'rd At t. MAI. Or 0611sT r �p50,Vk AMqp �` t • ---- ,lur. oftp� I -0 j AR�\ ' y /►+ccos f►•N , Came VJtLr x►I '�JJr�Cr\�� TxM � � ` � 1 I -� 12 � -4 I i 2�' Yl� I • J � I i /1/r•O � PR WG4IRRmI 'L •Iti]�S TM r _ _ - mil- - _ �1 S _. ' I , � emErwa � rttar5•a wnw,.ra :t+e � � I IISSEWb II 1 Fra�.�ct , I i -xx� T I _ D'-8� i �-4• 1 04•M j 1 • ' / �Im � � Fft" �I N .R wr W �a �+-I FLOOR FLAN '_I.Ao AREA I,16q25.F. N-C ARCA 1,064 y.F. OR IN City of Southlake, Texas M E M 0 R A N D U N November 8, 1989 TO: Board of Adjustment Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Case #77 Board of Adjustment Case # 77 is a request for a variance to the side yard requirement (25 feet) established for Agricultural zoning district per Ordinance No. 480, Section 9.5 (c). The request is made by Jerry and Patricia Gilliland. They have requested a building permit for a carport to be added to the West of the hone. The resulting side yard would be seven (7) feet. The location of the property is 680 East Dove Road, being legally described as James L. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 348, Tract 2B1A. The current zoning is Agricultural. There were ten (10) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been three (3) responses to this request. All three (3) were in favor: Mr. and Mrs. Bell, 650 East Dove Road Mr. and Mrs. Stockfelt, 600 East Dove Road Mr. Durham, 708 East Dove Road KPG For Your Information: The applicant requests that the Board members call before caning by to review the site. (481-3958) CITY OF SOiPIELAKE 667 N. Carroll Avenue '"" ... Southlake, Texas +. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS REQUEST FOR APPEAL NAME: ��, z �� T;, �� lati ;� FEE: $50.00 ADDRESS: TEITE NUMER: Ell LOCATION OF APPEAL: (address/legal description) �/-Atityo PO REASON FOR APPEAL: (describe in detail) W-Aft im '1� OR im rr Yr , DATE: SIGNATURE: CASE NO. ' BOafa a { AaJu6irmt1 } �� on i PW im My wife and I have lived in the residence at 680 East Dove for nearly twenty-two years. During that period we have added an addition and remodeled the interior. We would now like to convert the present carport for a family room and add a free-standing carport. We would like to add it five feet from the existing structure to the west and extend it to within seven feet of the side property line. It would have a similarly pitched roof line and be shingled and trimmed according to the existing design. The preffered location by ordinance would be five feet behind and five feet west of the house and then it could be as close as five feet to the side property line. However, we have a unique drainage problem ,,* in our rear yard. A normally dry creek meanders its way from southwest a" to northeast and essentially cuts our lot in half. The creek is fed by drainage from properties south of Dove Road funneling through a 32" pipe arl culvert that runs under Dove Road approximatly 100' west of our property line. Only once or twice in over twenty years can we remember runoff making the creek more than four to six feet wide. However, this past ill spring due to the inordinate amount of rainfall and development to our on south, the creek overflowed its banks three times (twice in one day). MY The yearly over flow of rain water has continually washed away much of our soil along the creek banks. After the hard spring rains we built a retaining wall of railroad X-ties and brought in over 30 yds. of fill dirt in an attempt to reclaim some of our yard. Therefore, locating the carport in the rear yard would put it perilously close to what can v4W become a raging torrent during thunderstorms. This location would also necessitate the cutting down of not less No WO than five of the eight trees that stand in that area of the yard, which would ruin the pleasantly rustic view now existing from our back yard and reduce its size significantly. These trees are perhaps thirty to ,ate forty years old being fully grown when we moved here. The removal of these trees may weaken the soil foundation resulting in further erosion. The attached drawings will help to further clarify and explain our requist for a side yard location. am O, im F11 f'. 0 U11 w � U aas 4. Q 4" v Q w aw ' esnl J oa c,o U") �in °� ,� cs' mi . a gNd1 VIHOMA °" = � u- :n � ow w �k 1 � fYr O r w ii Q Q. ~ r- N so j 40 r ss► . = a a cli Lv LIZ " U- o- V\ w In - � y n 0 Q \ � V s u.i I-l— ^ m V "J 0 0 IN w OR f Ott � OL "T H rl _ Vl- ] � --r------------''-----' - - oe mw��---' ------'------'------------ - t � � � I rAiSIBB�tw ' TROPHY CLUB SA„ _ LAKE �' L B-I• GRAPEVINE • ! Xf" BOB �= 1 = , V; "nunNElEt1F � . w:E IrNINr tr 1 i a a i • h j : i Eurf. It 5 cum ;E • d1 • S lASS O/ .r NTY = rsome PRLAY INT mIITN Tr I ` -- CY.NE Tow LAKE ? TNO=1011 Deli 1 (' �aaA��s OUNDIX I-+ - 1 •cam ���� �rtAr�•����a�� �SOOTXUKE XNYY� , r.... t wit OR s - aM E w -• »= JiE oN 1 3� ' F ROLSIOE BID�ifA• IZ ` S SAID r N r RANNO► 1 IT � WN - LA -1 • t • W • IFI ` i NA• s = ` �{ t I LAKESXONf Iw T ST�aT 3 a•BYXEL M r uBtie 901 Am. Wytn 10 I2 _ » I -ARON ST �Q Aw SIT2, » ^ �- s •,- M IOYF ST- E a a' EMftA10 C tN a = » NIGH SCHOOL 1 'MCRIMSBIRO V MITTAty CT y ` : r 4y tivE�_TS" *� •. t = ` .` � rMMRNtfU cvL% •y i �w =�iWFi•'��. :vK t JARLANE'NIN .'• a :s (�*' _ - rt t S OAKLANE S R.A�rirlOt ON' e ` •.jai ~ .''•1 . v 3� QMS �MAA1hCX .. ? B ArA^ M�EIOtY o TN - - ; `•���•+: I CAROCX C- �": ; +� Al-=•+wo I= NAYE : z -7MBLEWEE::" T :TRESS ♦,r S/falwf U '_ 3 LONOX 4ouX0u► -II j 3 ME. 77SII�'KI - OtN•1 ; �:9j1 - F a r t s = i ;LICE Ct / JACX O. JONNSO ,A$ ;� : OMAS.^' r!OOEt OCKANO ST. • ELEMENTARY' �'t •AMM;NOI,:, " I ...� 1F• ,<< • j -0LANO $T-E _ _ « 3 30x ;N1: »p=c'.•�`E�� FAWRES Ac j""sW000 -—3�SJao00 .=O » _ �• r�i Kt.+xt� '•� �� � I C _ ME CAEEA Eshk+r�si�rEE`; #Air, ' CARROLL : MIDDLE + i AIt:Maoo SCHOOL . �1=•MEAOOw �a'��,� I s �� 7AIN7::• ;i '�i.��Jc.0 FENCE >a t LIEN f -A MOM- :K _EX a• _ { rISSlr1RL114 UriOR s i : PH4:: $A'x 1 G!E ♦ ;c XENNrCT •?� �" ~� 3 ;`s » = tOLL.MG •I' - �V CITY _ - -�1_ L0001 Lit►v :3 - HALL k" • !f —aim-END Btvo- t tlYEtrcf 1 -• t to <� BICENTENNIAL . I'll, I,' ? catuy3s 1T = � ONNSt + PARK long •�y rd�" , �. _ I:N :9TXLARI SEn- W - 7N 1 � SOOXARF riv0. E ■'' ' N • .' ` e A/RIOR l •' rnf • PINE CT. E ' 1 R Dot H .-Luc-- 1 10 C t N r RAINBOW MF fac L 6RfENW000 ST Gd'0'A Ar\ 'Rs u j CACEy SWAN = • - ` CONTINIXYALF.TZ WCARROLL Cr 3 " COMTINF NIAl BLvO £ !!! y � � e = on = JJMEMTART •+y*Si a ,r7%♦ ♦ � XARI $T 1938 Wet COLLEYVILLE ■ 4 MN 1 TR 281 err v 4.0 AC +fit C.F. Bell AG j Ielton TR 29 ' AG 2.e AC ockfe�lt Ur-1 Burrows AG 1 A 1 a 0, 1 i 9 1.876 @ � E 7 .586 @01jo �. 8 OF 1.505 @ G� RitchP�y 4 SF-1 70 ,TR 2 TR 24 1.0 a( AG 13 TR 201 5 1.5 @ 10.0 AC 1.5 20ai Frazier Trust SF-1 E . J � 2R 1.5 @ W Z Q a f-o c= O H 0 r� w oavE-pCADao 210 t02 :°i Ito too Hess Cullum Foreman r*" TR ! I lAlE1 i ry TR .A2A II I t.0 I T=, 141 r }SF-1 AG i j AG i AC i $ 1 ° 1' AC i Tn 1A1 e $ S 2. ) AC ios ! TRIE TR lEl� • TR 1= i.E_c@ 1.65 @ 4.14 :C :v FlAl TR SA1.i i E !° TR 1A 5.0 AC a I 8.0 AC e 1.0 i Tri SA10AC ^ II AC TR 1A2 I a° I t,o jz .19 AC i I _ _ lietoo °o • � i ago _ 3 City of Southiake. Texas ti P t", M E M O R A N D U M November 8, 1989 TO: Board of Adjustment Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Case #78 Board of Adjustment Case #78 is a request for a variance to the minimem acreage requirement (50 acres) for a residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) per Ordinance No. 480, Section 30.3. The request is made by the Continental Joint Venture. The property is located on West Continental Blvd. adjacent to the Carroll Elementary School. The tract is 42.625 acres out of the S. H. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1504, Tracts 3 and 4A. The current zoning is Agricultural. There were ten (10) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no inquiries or responses regarding this variance request. The applicant provided additional information, including zoning history. While this information provides an overview of the project, the issue before the Board is the acreage variance. Does the applicant have a valid request to vary the acreage from 50.0 acres to 42.6 acres? If the Board grants the variance, it will be up to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council to grant or deny the applicant's zoning request for a residential PUD. 491f KPG IF +�►,, 1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE. N.W SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 (202) 887-4000 t 65 AVENUE LOUISE, P.B. NO. 7 1050 BRUSSELS. BELGIUM (011) 32-2-535.2911 n 0 Hand Delivery AKIN, Gump, STRAuss, HAUER & FELD ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 4100 FIRST CITY CENTER 1700 PACIFIC AVENUE DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4618 (214) 969-2800 TELEX 73-2324 CABLE AGSH 6F DALLAS FAX (214) 922-8043 WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUM9IER (2I4) 9691,179 October 20, 1989 Ms. Karen P. Gandy City of Southlake Building and Zoning Administrator 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 2100 ONE CONGRESS PLAZA III CONGRESS AVENUE AUSTIN. TEXAS 78701 (512) 499-6200 1500 MCNEI PLAZA 300 CONVENT STREET SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78205 (512) 270-0800 1900 PENNZOILPLACE-SOUTH TOWER 711 LOUISIANA STREET HOUSTON.TEXAS 77002 (713) 220-5800 Re: Continental J.V./Continental Boulevard Tract File No. 08717-0000 Dear Karen: This firm represents Continental Joint Venture, the owner of a 42.6 acre tract of land located on Continental Boulevard just west of Carroll Elementary School. Previously, a zoning application and plat had been submitted for this property and titled "County Walk Addition." As you know, we would like to file a zoning application for a single family PUD on this property, but cannot because the property is less than 50 acres. In corder to file such an application, we are required to obtain a variance to the 50 acre requirement from the Board of Adjustment. Consequently, enclosed please find the application for a variance to Ordinance 480, Section 30.3. It is my understanding that this request will be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment at its November 13, 1989 meeting. AKIN, Gump, STRAUss, HAUER & FELD Ms. Karen P. Gandy October 10, 1989 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, William S. Dahlstrom WSD/td enclosure cc: Mr. David Howell Kirk R. Williams, P.C. OWA CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS REQUEST FOR APPEAL NAME: CONTINENTAL JOINT VENTURE FEE: $50.00 ADDRESS: 14860 Montfort Drive, Dallas, Texas 75240 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 214/490-3255 LOCATION OF APPEAL: Please see attached Exhibit "A" REASON FOR APPEAL: The owner of the subject property has previously submitted an application for a zoning amendment on the site for a single family development on the entire 42.6 acres of land. The request was denied by the City Council primarily due to the placement of single family lots below the landing pattern for airplanes at nearby Gocde Airport. Several special conditions unique to this property suggest that a PUD is most appropriate for this site. The flexibility provided by the PUD ordinance would enable the owner to incorporate measures to address the landing pattern as well as other adjoining issues such as Carroll Elementary School 6001 to the east and industrial/commercial property to the west, while enabling the owner to realize a reasonable density. In order to develop the property with single family residential, which is the most suitable use for the property, and accommodate the landing pattern, the owner is proposing a planned unit development for single family uses as well as a 5-acre open space under the landing pattern. However, Ordinance No. 480, Section 30.3 establishes a 50.0 acre minimum area requirement for single family planned unit developments. At this time, the applicant requests a variance of said section to allow the owner to submit a PUD request for the 42.6 acre tract. A literal enforcement of the 50 acre requirement would essentially prevent the owner from providing the desired open space under the landing pattern and developing the property with the optimal land use. Furthermore, literal enforcement would result in unnecessary hardship because the subject tract only contains 42.6 acres. Granting such a variance would not be contrary to the public interest, and the spirit of the ordinance, especially the PUD sections, would be observed. According to the w ,4" purpose and intent of the PUD district, the purpose is "to permit flexibility and encourage a creative, efficient and aesthetically desirable design and placement of buildings, open spaces, circulation patterns and to best utilize special site features such as topography, size and shape." As stated earlier, the PUD would enable the owner to address characteristics unique to this property. Obviously, such conditions have not resulted from the actions of the applicant and the literal enforcement of the ordinance would prevent the owner form addressing these special conditions. Therefore, granting a variance furthers the general purpose of the PUD district regulations. DATE: 492akk4 /T42 S I GNATURE : CASE NO: hard e� Ad�astn►en+ 1$ n 11 9 — 3 — S • 3 EXHIBIT "A" k 'BEING a tract of land situated in the S. H. Thompson Survey, A- 1504, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being that same ..tract conveyed .to _Texas Commerce Bank - Hurst by deed ,recorded in Volume 8678, Page 2221 of the Tarrant County Deed !Records, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a P.K. nail in Continental Boulevard for the northeast corner of a 12.94 acre tract as recorded in Volume ' 8071, Page 1726, Deed Records THENCE S 89.59159' E along of Tarrant County, Texas; Continental Boulevard distance 1,063.48 feet to a a of P.K. nail; THENCE south a distance of 28.25 feet to a 1/2" iron pin in the south line of Continental Boulevard; THENCE S 00°00'19" W a distance of 457.84 feet to a 5/8" iron pin; THENCE S 25059'59" E a distance of 1,143.50 feet to a 5/8" iron pin; e"A'", THENCE N 89059123" W ge^erally along a fence a distance o: 1,535.67 feet to a 3/4" iron pin for the southeast corner of said 12.94 acre tract; '4lZNC N 00050154" E along the east line of said 12.94 acre tract and generally along a fence a distance of 567.68 -eet to a 1" iron pin; THENCE N 00°45138" E along the east line of said 12.94 acre tract and generally along a rock wall and a fence a distance of 925.40 feet to a 3/4" iron gin in the said south line of Continental Boulevard; THENCE N 000451450 E a distance of 20.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and encompassing 43.222 acres of land, of which 0.597 acres lie in Continental -Boulevard, leaving a net of 42.625 acres of land. The undersigned does hereby certify that this zoning description was compiled from a boundary survey that was made on the ground by Everage, Smith, Farrington & Associates, dated February 9, _1989 and signed by J. M. (Ted) Everage, R.P.S. No. 2762. •• .......•.. - •• ••a David R. Washingtt R.P.S. t CiY10 R �1�.....; `i� No. 3629 WESTLAKE ` • DENTTOON�COUNTy TAAR.INT COUNTY TROPHY CLUB Irrrrrrrr 1 DISTRICT BOUA IQ 1/I Iwtvmx LDw N.... LAKE SAm, GRAPEVINE BOB JOKS Ra to DWI ' _ _ ( 3 ! 1 tOSsOw RILIOw � -: LOOSE NECK a \ ' 2 REOINU to M> a SWAN i« II 3 1 S CRANE EASS OR ^IRumc TROUT I . •P IN SIM CNA//N TRAIL LARE m \ (� THOUSAND OAKS 1 twjrrrrr;r�ji�rrrrrr �It t 1 g SOUYRLARE -fjR r IN1 ' Wta N►'tE� N -r r Rrrrrr� \ 1 +910 OR Ig oA O` IAIn1R 4 ' I NKLSRN go `• i y il"u"TO E i ` s e_ T ltfAT IN"a1&91 i cusuNt a « xARtaE ,,'}' _ILUE TEAL CT: m S S1UINLA9E I1t_w CT ' 1 WOMAN Oil `u+ WRRET LK IU \ S NKLTO►so � SWEET ST �? Y= 3 3 •• tR11TEl Nt R . ;W p0. e`I *� is at MM �TATLON 1� t f 24 e Not Ci S T « I� �� ' MOTE ST-E _ OM ST_ w 1 � EAIEIIAtO CIR1 _" �^ •,� ROIIM 3 « .. CARROLL �� -• + u ;V LNi I NIGH SCHOOL s• J 8 MOC[1xCI1No LA20 V ►RIMROSE LR_ sF!• '� i. t z, E='SWEEW OARLANE. N 1 OARLANf.f ElAN1A1N�M'i g i, �, V: w Li I� I ^� SLEEK xpll '4n ► n �e� " �► `r--- "v[� �' 't -•tyRAYF ( �yPixo 4 CT W� �_. I Jftocx cr, at 3 2 '711ILEWEEM i 1 u `!C7t'NEIS !! p�4X ON i I�A13PEI�IN3.WN 7 MIROU► Tt ' A. 3 1a our :ollfSf lil a ! - i 1 JACK D. JONNSO o" J 1 L$NCNORx .N � I@ r E! m „ HIDDEN e• q� �'� ^ M' 61E'► �" !NOMLANB ST. W �_ ELEMENTARY S!'! �s:� 1c CT I- + .�, 8 iAl CAx1GM C��Uq T t RAWRES RO IKINOSW000 - " s x J. � � i MESA ..�. I a•I it j + Ff�[ `BOSS TimtEt•S 'YAY/1 + -f epty �1 % fw_ ELOAENCE � t0 + I f. . -_ _ GLEM 1� GLEN . lCINItEKl11MI TO 1 COTE j` HILLSIDE C= (aE. W 'coltum TN != 1 JONRSa as I'e - -1 1709 � If s 6{O�f- R Y1� I� ' GOOOE w I �j e AIRPORT N 1 I 1 a•NIC�EL 6REENW000 t , CAE�w IRiAN L�AiR'tAUA'GA � (` LER i 19ae Z!1 I DUE CREIr s 1 ad is Dom E MlSflp+ ALA�1 CR ,� v YE HENRY CT O,P `•+ 3 LODG.lyyAa �jt OIAAAmMEVV OICEPARIINIAI� IFA pY - �� J SOUINLARE ILTD- IT'*t Do s > W s CONTIMENTAL ILYO_ IN : 3 �'��,L cT , i REt �l COL CARROLL 1 MIDDLE SCHOOL t sGy'ai� ae o; I CITY HALL n1 OUIRLAKE MUD- E -%' olws tlmir I - S : - S lI999rE tOt7N C66NMAL BLVIL-- tact sctwAtiR - - I 2 13.73! :.� 1L12S K j 23,7Sf K 1Ly3 sr �V PROPOSED SOCCER "M17 / (' ISA39 Sr ISAN K � . , HANOVER CT. • ( Wn K ---- - - I 13323 Sr tS.W Sf \ IL-3 Sr \ \ I1fAs2 K 1 O j 3 13A10 Sr i�n 7 I - if 7 J --- — J ,tIPRMS-� s N u3 K Woo K V .I 23.454 K i3.•17 a 13,ON _ 1 r— t1[E COVER BI OE K460 PC i I sr DEVONWOOD CT- 6 i ? w SED 3 N ISO IP,D.D=Eo .� �.- 13A21 Sr t 1 .040 Sr p \ \VC. WED" M. M9 U \ 20KD Sr- f \� 20,M3 K N11 \ I iS.777 Sr 13SN 4 7 41 13.452 Sr 12 20A33 4 1LS/f Sr,\ I1 W • ` \ � 23.440 Y 3 ts.n3 s< 17.612 K 17.763 K 39 '\\ 1 17./12 S< 20.352 Sr \ n K 23 LOCATION 1&7 U Sr t0 r7_MS sr i OISTWG Zap" I 16.S17 Sr ,3PROPOSED ZONNrCRESrWOOD C7.131\.. 3` 1. '`" �R PLAN WID Op IS �E" •,'0 ,L•:2 Sr �l PROPOSED USE 27.N7 K ! DRAir IO TOT770TAK1 107S 1 AREA 3 Sr •-C 17AM K I A i OENLIr r (I ]7 YIN. l07 MDIN 1fa11 K r to C SR' sr OPEN LOT wa 1f30./ v 1to i OPEN SPACE DMICA RDODIIMY i11NCE: e — /EWA CAMMM1Y Y tUO3 4 - f{IPRNtl0011 ML / Sfa tt K K Etta K \ n. 2z s 2120 ass K t62l� K 15.7977 Sr 10,ao K g fSs a.f73 K CREEK TER RAC CT. K e1 © 2 ! or Mov33 K 13M• Sr t Sr 1 ,1M K !q Sr l0.1.11 !E CRY UIRI M N iSl.S.67 111 / ME LEN CRT � sn7a en un - — M NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: COUNTRY WALK ADDITION M, NAME OF APPLICANT: CONTINENTAL JOINT VENTURE 14860 Montfort Drive, Suite 105 Dallas, Texas 75240 SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 43.2 Acres LOCATION OF PROPERTY: On Continental Boulevard immediately west of Carroll Elementary School. Please see Exhibit "A". REQUEST: On October 20, 1989, application was made to the Zoning Board of Adjustments for a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Section 30.3, establishing a fifty _(50) acre -minimum for Residential Planned Unit Developments. According to Section 30.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the purpose and intent of the PUD "is to permit flexibility and encourage a more creative, efficient and aesthetically desirable design and placement of buildings, open spaces, circulation patterns and to best utilize special site features such as topography, size and shape." Approval of the variance in this specific case would be in the best interest of the citizens of Southlake by allowing the applicant to submit a PUD that would not only provide for the most compatible land use adjacent to Carroll Elementary, but also provide for a 4.6 Acre Open Space/Park. The applicant's present 66 lot PUD plan, which has an average lot size of over 21,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet, obviously maintains the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance and more specifically the "SF-20" zoning classification. Granting of a variance from the fifty (50) acre mimimum in this specific instance would be in "harmony with the general purpose and intent" of the Zoning Ordinance by allowing the applicant to utilize the flexibility provided by the PUD to appropriately address the adjacent land uses (Carroll Elementary, Goode Airport and Tex -Stone), the existing topography and the Size, shape and location of this tract, while providing aesthetically desirable home sites, open spaces and traffic circulation patterns. CURRENT ZONING: "AG", AGRICULTURE RECENT ZONING HISTORY: On September 19, 1989, the City Council denied a request to rezone the property 11SF-20B11, Single Family Residential, primarily because of the flight patterns for airplanes at nearby Goode Airport and the potential impact from the adjacent non- conforming industrial use (concrete batch plant and manufacturing facility for land- scape products). To mitigate the detri- mental impacts of these adjacent uses and to incorporate the positive effects of Carroll Elementary School and other adjacent compatible land uses, the applicant requires the flexibility of a Planned Unit Development to vary lot sizes, create innovative open spaces, and buffer adjacent incompatible land uses. a PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Family Planned Total Lots: 66 Density: 1.53 lots/acre Minimum Lot Width: 100 feet Average Lot Area: 21,152 square Required Open Space: 4.32 acres Open Space Provided: 4.60 acres LAND USE BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Unit Development feet 1. MASTERPLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: The City of Southlake Masterplan designates the subject property "mixed use development" which recommends commercial/residential, but no industrial uses. 2. OPEN SPACE ' (PROPOSED PARK): The open space is aligned with the Goode Airport to alleviate the noise and safety concerns raised at the September 19, 1989 City Council hearing. The proposed park would provide a much needed active play area for this neigh- borhood and surrounding areas, and is strategically located adjacent to Carroll Elementary School. Since park land - is currently at a shortage, this proposed park, as indicated conceptually on the attached Exhibit "A", would be of tremendous benefit to the southwest Southlake area. 3. NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL. The proposed development is the most compatible .and desirable adjacent land use.and will provide Carroll Elementary School with additional students. Any other land use permitted by the Masterplan would-, have activities incon- sistent with the school use. 4. ADJACENT CONCRETE BATCHING PLANT: The proposed development has been designed to minimize the number of lots with adjacency to the batching plant property_ Reduction in the size of some of the interior lots, has allowed the oversizing of the lots adjacent to the batching plant property thereby allowing enough lot depth to provide for a landscape buffer easement along the west property line of the proposed development. At such time the batching plant property is sold and re- developed, the probable land use will be retail/commercial which will not pose the same detrimental traits and can be designed to minimize the effects on the residential uses. 5. SITE DESIGN: The property has been designed with a loop circulation pattern for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic. Existing trees and vegetation will be main- tained where possible and have been incorporated into the open space providing _ a buffer to the Carroll Elementary School. -2- City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1989 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:30 P.M. ' AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the October 9, 1989 Board of Adjustments Meeting. 3. Administrative Camrents. 4. Consider: Case #74. Special Exception Use for Outside Storage per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (tt) for Block A, Lots 1A,1B, 2 and Block B, Lots 7 & 8, Southlake Bank Place. Owner: Darr Equipment Company. Zoning: Industrial-1. Location: 350, 400, 401 Bank Street. Public Hearing. OWN 5. Consider: Case #75. Special Exception Use for Family Quarters per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (n) for B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tract 1A. Owner: Jerry Sutton. Zoning: Single Family 1A. I~r Location: 1202 Randol Mill Avenue. Public Hearing. 6. Consider: Case #76. Request for variance to maximum square footage (1,000 square foot) allowable for family quarters per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (n). B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tract 1A, 1.003 acres of land. Owner: Jerry Sutton. Zoning: Single Family 1A. Location: 1202 Randol Mill Avenue. f~ Public Hearing. 7. Consider: Case #77. Request for variance to side yard requirement in Agricultural District per Ordinance No. 480, Section 9.5(c). James L. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 348, Tract 2B1A, 2.00 acres of land. Owner: Jerry and Patricia Gilliland. Zoning: Agricultural. Location: 680 East Dove Road. " Public Hearing. City of Southlake, Texas Board of Adjustment Agenda November 13, 1989 Page two 8. Consider: Case #78. Request for variance to the minimum. acreage requirement in residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) per Ordinacne No. 480, Section 30.3. S.H. Thcmpson Survey, Abstract No. 1504, Tracts 3 and 4A, 42.625 acres of land. Owner: Continental Joint Venture. Zoning: Agricultural. Location: South side of West Continental Blvd., West of Carroll Elementary School. Public Hearing. 9. Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, Wednesday , November 8, 198,,„attrrrA4 noon pursuant to the Open IMeeings Law, Article 6252-17 V~,42 ,U L q 4Y.,, Sandra L. LeGrand ' o City Secretary pptnn unt~t~ iYI~Y iWr I