1973-10-02
15) 9
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
October 2, 1973
A G E N D A
I. Public Hearing on Am
o ending Ordinance No. 161
regulating alcoholic beverages.
II. Fire Department Report - Chief R. P. Steele.
III. Water Department Repott - Supt. W. G. Cline.
IV. Police Department Report - Chief D. R. Hughes.
V. Resolution No. 73-27, calling for 4th Partial
Payment to Chicago Bridge & Iron Company.
VI. Planning & Zoning Recommendation re ZA-73-8,
for approval of request for F District by James
Turner Company.
VII. NCTCOG Report on Airport Compatible Development
Regulations of Land Use.
VIII. Approval of Bills.
IX. Ordinance No. 202 rescinding Ordinance No. 194.
X. Resolution No. 73-28, calling for approval of
Judgnmnt in Cause No. 17-8539-71, City of Southlake,
vs. City of Grapevine to be entered in the 17th
District Court, Tarrant County, Texas.
XI. Resolution No. 73-29, calling for contracting
janitorial service.
XII. Resolution No. 73-30, calling for contracting
701 Comprehensive Planning.
160
• CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
October 2, 1973
The City Council of the City of Southlake met in regular session
in the Council Chamber of City Hall in Southlake, Texas, on Tues-
day, October 2, 1973, with the following members present:
Wade Booker, Mayor
Billy Joe Knox, Mayor Pro Tem
W. 0. Nunn, Councilman
Frank Tetrault, Councilman
Sam Davis, Councilman
R. D. Drummond, Councilman (arriving late)
Also present: William D. Campbell, City Attorney.
Mayor Booker called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The in-
vocation was given by Councilman Knox. The minutes of the last
regular meeting were approved as read.
Ordinance No. 161-53: Mayor Booker announced that this public
® hearing was open and invited anyone in the audience to speak or
ask questions. Discussion among the Councilmen followed about
the procedure for obtaining a permit. Mr. Corbett Emery in the
audience informed the Council as to the fee charged by Grapevine.
Councilman Knox moved that Ordinance No. 161-53 be passed and
approved amending Ordinance No. 161 regulating alcoholic bever-
ages, providing the application fee to be the same as the cur-
rent zoning application fee in effech:and $200 for the permit
annually; seconded by Councilman Nunn. Motion passed unanimously.
(Said Ordinance attached hereto and made a part hereof.)
Fire Department report was made by Chief R. P. Steele who ex-
plained about the gasoline wash-down shown on said repott. He
told the Council that the training classes were accomplishing
a lot of good. Discussion then followed on setting priorities
on purchases of necessary fire equipment. (Said report attached.)
Water Department report was made by Supt. W. G. Cline who ad-
vised the Council the dragons were now painted on the tank and
all projects are moving along as well as possible.
Police Department report was turned in by Chief D. R. Hughes.
He pointed out that-auto accidents were on the decline. The
Council instructed him to obtain bids on patrol cars and to
advertise same. (Report attached.)
i
a
Resolution No. 73-27: calling for payment of Partial Estimate
to Chicago Bridge & Iron Company was unanimously passed and
approved on motion by Councilman Knox; seconded by Councilman
Davis. (Said Resolution being attached hereto and made a part
hereof.)
Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval for F District
zoning as requested in ZA-73-8 on land owned by James Turner Com-
pany. The public hearing was set for November 6th at 7:30 P.M.
NCTCOG meeting on developing compatible land uses for communities
affected by the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport was given by the City
Secretary. The Council advised that NCTCOG be informed of South-
lake's interest in participating and having representation on
the committee to be set up for the Airport Vicinity Land Use Plan.
Mayor Booker asked that a motion be made granting pay raises to
the City's employees in accordance with the new Budget and to be
effective October 1st. So moved by Councilman Drummond; seconded
by Councilman Tetrault. Motion passed unanimously.
The City Attorney was directed to prepare an amendment to the
ordinance creating the Planning & Zoning Commission changing its
members to seven on motion by Councilman Knox; seconded by
Councilman Nunn. Motion passed unanimously.
The bills presented were approved for payment on motion by
Councilman Knox; seconded by Councilman Tetrault. Motion passed
unanimously.
Ordinance No. 202, rescinding Ordinance No. 194, was unanimously
passed and approved on motion by Councilman Knox; seconded by
Councilman Nunn. (Ordinance No. 202 attached hereto and made
a part hereof.)
Resolution No. 73-28: calling for a judgment to be entered in
Cause No. 17--F51 - filed on behalf of the City of Southlake
in the 17th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, entitled
"City of Southlake vs. City of Grapevine", was passed and ap-
proved on motion by Councilman Nunn; seconded by Councilman Knox.
Voting "For" - Councilmen Nunn, Knox, Tetrault and Davis; opposed
- Councilman Drummond. Motion carried. (Resolution No. 73-28
attached hereto and made a part hereof.)
Resolution No. 73-29: calling for contractual janitor service
as provided in the-1973-74 Budget was unanimously passed and
approved on motion by Councilman Knpx; seconded by Councilman
Davis. (Said Resolution attached hereto and made a part hereof.)
The Council authorized Chief of Police D. R. Hughes to close
White Chapel Boulevard from Southlake Boulevard to Highland
Street to through traffic during the period of time the 12"
Council Mt a. 10/2/73-Page 2
77-
162
® water main is being laid.
Resolution No. 73-30: authorized the Mayor to enter into a
planning services contract under the 701 Comprehensive'
Planning Program was unaeimously passed and approved on
motion by Councilman Knox; seconded by Councilman Davis.
(Said Resolution being attached hereto and made a part hereoff)
The City Attorney advised the Council of the status of the
VanLandingham matter.
There bung no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Mayor
ATTTESS~T :
City Secretary
Council Mtg. 10/2/7 - Page 3.
CITY Of SBNTHLAXE IN THE DISTRICT COURT
` yrs. TARRANT COUNTY,, TEXAS
CITY Of GRAPEVINE 17TH 4UDICYAL DISTRICT
On the,
of October, 1973, cacao on to be heard the
above styled C&vsat acrd tam# the parties by and through their
attorneys of record; so ,err having been dwanded, the matters of
fact as w *It as of law were presented to the Courts and the Court,
after hearing evidence, including exhibits roflatetinp a division of
the overlapping extraterritorial jurisditttoa -_between the City of
Soutbloke, Texas and the City of Grapevine, T**as* the Court finds.
that there is overlapping extraterritorial or isditt,lan bats the
-*w6 said municipal corporations cad that a fair and equitable
apportionment of such extraterritorial jurlA diction is found to exist
as described further in this Judgment and as presented by the partios
through said exhibits; that all prior annexations by either party
involving any portion of the property hereinafter made the exclusive
extraterritorial jurisdittiou of the opposite party should be void
effective the data of this Judgment;
It is therefore ONIERED, Ath?h'# OED AND DECREER that the City of
hs Southlake, Texas shall have as it's exclusive extraterritorial
jarlsdictional area the following area.
(l) That area of land in Tarrant County, Texas Nest of the
beginning point of the field notes contained in Exhibit *A* attacked
hereto and made a part hereof and also being North of the North
right-of-way lieu of State Highway 121 and such area North and Nest
of said point extending in a Southwesterly direction from the said
b"i-ent" tat described in Exhibit *A* along the North right-of-way
line of State Highway 121 to a point one mile Southwest in that North
right-of-way line of State Highway 121, awrbiab point is one mile
Southwest beyond the center line of the intersection of Big Bear
Crook with the worth ri Dbt-of-wray lint of State Mi Dhwraiy 121; &Ad,
(8) all the am of land Watt of the boundary line dtleriblad by
mates and bounds in the field notes attaeb*4 hereto as Exhibit •A".
It is forthtr ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND OE ED that the City of
Brapovfnae, Texas, shall have aaE It's exclusive extraterritorial
" jurisdictional area the following areas
(1) That area of laved in Tarrant Coauotyo Taexa Nest of the field
g notaa $ eontaintd in Exhibit *A* attached hereto and aaawade s part hereof
and also being South of that North ri gbt-of-way line of State Ri ghway
IZI and such great South and West of said point extending in a
Southwesterly dir#etion froo the said begiaaaaaaaing point described in
Exhibit "A* above along that North right•of-woy Ilaaae of 'Mate Highway
121 to a poiaet one silo Southwest in the North right-of-way line of
State Highway 1210 which paint is ona silo Southwest beyond the
coaaterline of the intersection of Big Bear Creak with that North
right-of-way line of State Highway 121; and (2) all the area of land
East of tho boundary line described by mates and bounds in the field
notes attaebod be** vat Exhibit *A*
It is further QRAE.RED,, AD-JU04C 1 AND DECREED that any prior
annexations of area by the City of Southl4k#o Texas, covering any of
the area granted in this judgment to the City of Qropaeviaee as
*xel us i ve extraterritorial jurisdiction is hereby dtcl,or*d void
effective as of the date of this judgmen ;
it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that any prior
annexations of or*& by the City of Draperin*, Tax" -govering any of
the area granted in this jaadgo*nt to the City of SereWato as
exclusive a extrht+erOltortb1 jurisdiction is hereby daeelored void
1 effective as of the date of this judsmont;
I
r`
i
It is fartoer ORDERED that costs of court ar* taxad against
tta city of Soatblak k# Texas, with any saraaylag *XP0*ses in
coaaettion with tho pragarstioa of Exhibit "A" portion of this
jvd u*at Weg taaod sgaiast tha City of Bra *vino, Taxas, for
III of which lot ox0eutioe is$$*.
SIGNED this - AaP of Odtobar 1973,
T+ mot Co, Ttxos
APP ROVE a
i
V11 i 1,410 V* G
Att+ary fa»i t1► of toothl ake
II
AttOraey~for City of 4r##exiao
E,
STATE Of TUAS, by aad t4ro gh
district Attorney of Tsrraot toaaty Teaos.
.
l ,4
r n
a
• to ~._..a.. ;.8
3- 3
F
Field notes describing all~llr line between the Cities of
Grapevine and Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, said line
f
representing a line between the two said
cities; Described as follows
1
r
Beginning at a point in the North R.O.W.,line of State Highway i
No. 121, the same being the Northeast comer of a tract of land
conveyed by Robert Fugene Tibbits and wife, Helen Elizabeth
Tibbits to William R. McKee by deed dated 8-31-53, fried far
record 9-12-53 in Volume 2612, Page 307, Deed Records of Tarrant
County, Texas, the same point also being the most southerly
southeast corner-of a tract of land conveyed by William R. McKee
to Matalee S. Webster by deed dated 12-16-60, filed for record
E
in Volume 3738, Page 157, Ueed Records of Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE, Westerly along the common property line of the said
„ McKee and Webster tracts a distance of 1,506 feet more or less-
to the Northwest corner of the said McKee tract, the same point
being the Southwest corner of the said Webster tract, said
point being in the East line of the C. B. McDonald Survey,
A Abstract 1013
ONCE, Northerly along the said''east line of the said McDonald
~r -
Survey line, the same being the west line of the said Webster
,e tract, a distance of 1,550 feet more or less to the northeast
corner of the said McDonald Survey, the same being the North-
west corner of the said Webster tract;
THENCE', Easterly along, the north !proerty line 'of the said
Webster tract, the same being along a portion of the south line
of a 33 acre tract as recorded ire' Volume` 3934, Page '184, Deed
1
Records of T&rrant County 'and dated 12-16-60, at 645, feet more
si
or less the southeast corner of, the said 33 acre tract, the
same being the southwest corner of x:54.88 acre tract as re-
corded in Volume 4737, Page 654, deed records of Tarrant
Exhibit "A" Cause No. 17-8539-7 '
17th' District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
a
County, continuing along the south line of said 54.88 acre
14
r tract, at 1827 feet more or less, the southeast corner of }
said 54.88 acre tract, the same being the southwest corner of
a 46.867 acre tract of land as recorded in Volume 4400, Page
i
80, deed records of Tarrant County, Texas, in all 2,421 feet
more or less to the southeast corner of the said 46.867 acre
tract;
THENCE, Northerly along the east line of said 46.867 acre
tract, the same being the:most easterly west line of a tract
p• .
of land conveyed to Grapevine Properties Venture by-deed re-
corded in Volume 4890, Page 866, deed records of Tarrant County,
Texas, a distance of 1650 feet more or less to the most northerly
AW, t
northwest corner of said Grapevine Properties Venture tract;
r
THENCE, easterly along the north line of said Grapevine
Properties Venture tract at 933 feet more or less, the ntheast ~
corner of said Grapevine Properties tract, crossing the R.O.W.
of State Highway 114, as it stands this date, in all 1350 feet ;
more or less to a point in the east R.O.W. line oi°said State
Highway No. 114, as it stands this date;
THENCE,.in a northwesterly direction along, the said east R.O.W.
line of State Highway 114 at approximately 600 ft. Crossing
A
the east line of.the'Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract 474, and
continuing northwesterly along the said Highway R.b.W,: and f
curving to the right to the intersection of the said State'
Highway R.O.W. with the East line of the Thomas Easter Survey,
~A Abstract 458;
w
THENCE,. North along; the said east line of the 1hompts Easter
r Survey 560, feet:mare''or less-to its intersection with the City
Limits line ;of the -Cities of Southlake and Grapevine, Texas,
said City limits line being parallel with and approximately
300 feet north of said State Highway 114 as it stood September
ZS, 1956.
i
Page 2 Cause No. 17-8539-71
17th District Court
Exhibit *A.".. Tarrant County,Texas
T
A
N
/ THENCE, Northwesterly along the said City Limits line to its
i
intersection with Jones Branch.
THENCE,Northerly along with the meanderings of the said Jones
Branch to its intersection with the south property line of a
tract of land referred to as second tract in a deed to Feeney.D.
Fry and wife Frances Fry as recorded in Volume 2283, Page 5920
Tarrant County Deed Records;
THENCE, westerly along the south line of the, said tract 2 to its
southwest corner, said corner being in the eas line of the
a Samuel'Freeman Survey, Abstract 525;
A
THENCE, North along the west line of said tract 2 approximately
' 1320 feet to its northwest corner;
a.
+ THENCE, east along the north line of said tract 2 to its inter-
section with the centerline of Jones Branch;
THENCE, Northerly along and with the meanderings of the said
' centerline of Jones Branch to its intersection with a line pro-
jected due east from the northeast corner of the Samuel Freeman
Survey, Abstract 525;
.
THENCE, west along the said projected line to the northeast
corner of the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract 525;
THENCE, continuing west along the north line of.the said Freeman
Survey to its northwest corner, the same being the Southwest
corner of the F. Wood Survey, Abstract 688; and same being in the
center line of Kimball Road.
THENCE, North along the west line of the said F. Woad Survey, to
the Southwest corner of a tract of land owned' by .jimmy M. Messina
as recorded.in Volume 38309 Page 381, Tarrant County deed records;
r THENCE, east.along and with the south line of the said Jimmy Messina
tract to its intersection with the West line of a U.S. Government
r
road,the same being the southeast corner of said Jimmy Messina prop*& I
.
Exhibit "A Cause No. 17-8539-71
17th District Court.
Page Tarrant County,Texas
.
...w:q ..rggpcpy,.!i.'gpJn9 +we•aaTTk'^~P^+.wwNlwowFSwMk .neslinn, `^tro+ .._~.~.►w,s~+a5+.• 1.:.'
THEM=$ west 169 feet to the southeast corner of said Cate .37
% cre tract;
a TM UKZg north 95 feet to the northeast corner-of said Cate tract;
THENCE, west 169 feet to the northwest corner of said Cate tract;
t
the same being in the east line of the N. E. Thompson Survey; E
,r
THENCE, north along the said east line of the N. E. Thompson Survey,
'
passing the Northeast corner of said N. E. Thompson Survey and
continuing due north and along the centerline of County Road 3061
' to intersect with a line projected west from the southwest corner of
a tract of land deeded to Carl Winfred Rickett and wife Mary Elizabeth
Rickett as recorded in Volume 4177 P
age 181, Tarrant County Deed
Records;
THENCE, east along said projected line to the said southwest corner
~f said Rickett tract;,
»
THENCE, east along the south line of the said Rickett tract 367 feet
more or less to the southeast corner of said tract, the same being
the southwest corner of a tract of land deeded to Frank L. Kennel
and wife Freda Kennel and Joe Kennel as recorded in Volume 4251,
r
Page 1650 Tarrant County Deed Records;
THENCE, east along the south line of said Kennel tract 415 feet more
or less to the southeast corner of said Kennel tract;
THENCE, north 265 feet more or less to the northeast corner of-said
Kennel tract, said point being.in the east line of the John Childress
Survey, Abstxuct 2$41
ENCE, continuing riorth along the said l east ;line of the John
Childress Survey tQ its intersection with the Tarrant, Denton County
.
. line;
THENCE, continuing due north to the'north`shore of Grapevine Lak*p .
a ,
i
Exhibit "A" Cause''No.i1-8539-71
17th DisteictGourt
Page 5 Tarrant County,Texts
# rte'
ilA. 16 i;
a
THENCE, northwesterly along the west line of said Gove
rnment road
same being the east line of said Jimmy Messina tract to the north.
east corner of said Jimmy Messina tract;
* THENCE best, passing the northeast corner of the Francis Troop.
Survey Abstract 1511 and continuing west along the north line of
said Troop Survey, passing the most northerly southwest corner of
the G. B. Chancellor Survey, Abstract 390 to the Southwest corner
AN of the L. Lincoln Survey, Abstract 981, the same being the center.
line of County Road 3061, which is sometimes called Dove Loop;
T1:1ENCEt North along the said West line of the,L. Lincoln Survey to
the southwest corner of 'a one acre tract of land,deeded to Robert
Lee.Norman and wife, Shirley D. Norman as recorded in Volume 42589
R Page 165, Tarrant County Deed Records;
THENCE, east along the south line of the said oneacre Norman tract
E
460 feet to its southeast corner;
THENCE, North 95 feet to the northeast corner of said one acre
Norman Tract;
~r
THENCE, West 460 feet to the northwest corner of the said Norman
tract, the same being in the said west line of the L. Lincoln.Survey;
THENCE, North along the said west line of the L. Lincoln Survey, to
the southwest corner of tract 1 as in a► deed to Louie G. Monroe, et
ux Jean Monroe as recorded in Volume 3975
Page 93, Tarrant County
I Deed Records;
w
THENCE, east 325' feet to the southeast corner 'of tract '2 :as in said
.
~E deed to Louie G. Monroe and et ux Jean Monroe.
M THENCE, north 138,.1 feet to the northeast'corner of said, tract, 2;'
THENCE, west 3;5 feet to the northwest corner of: said tract 29 the
same being in the nest Line of the said L. Lincoln; Suxjvey and ih*
east It =6 of the N. E.° Th oiVson . Survey, Abstract 156,3.
F~
THENCE, north-along .the .said west line'pf the L. Lincoln! Survey to
the southwest corner'of a .37 acre tract of'land deeded.to Freddie
Lee Cate and wife Glenda Cate as recorded in. Volume 41730 Page 9
Tarrant County Deed Records.
Exhibit .A Cause,No. 17-8539=71
`
17th District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
+I~i Page 4
r
ORDINANCE NO. 202
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO.
194 OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS;
AND VACATING THE NUMBER "194" IN THE
ORDINANCE BOOK.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH-
LAKE, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1: Ordinance No. 194, passed and approved by the
City il of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a regular
meeting held on the 16th day of January, 1973, for the pur-
pose of reaching an agreement with the City of Grapevine
regarding future annexations of land lying between the
said City of Grapevine and the City of Southlake, is hereby
rescinded and the number "194" vacated in the Book of
Ordinances of the City of Southlake.
Section 2: Said Ordinance was never filed for record.
Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of ctober A.D. 1973.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clty Secretary
LV
ORDINANCE NO. 161-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 161 OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY ADDING PARAGRAPH 4
TO'SECTION VII-SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
"ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES SPECIFIC USE PERMIT"; AN
ORDINANCE REGULATING THE STORAGE, SALE, POSSESSION
OR SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS;
PROVIDING FOR SUCH USES TO BE PERMITTED ONLY ON
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN A "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT;
EXEMPTING SUCH USES WHEN ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
UNDER CERTAIN SPECIFIC CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A
PENALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 161 of the City of Southlake,
Texas is hereby amended by including the following as paragraph
4. of Section VII. "Supplementary District Regulations":
"4. Alcoholic Beverages- "SP" Specific Use Permit
(a)Not withstanding any provisions of any ordinance
currently in effect in the City of Southlake, Texas, the storage,
sale, possession or serving of any alcoholic beverages when
permitted by the laws of the State of Texas, shall be regulated
as provided herein inside the corporate limits of the City of
Southlake, Texas.
(b). The storage, possession, sale or serving of alcoholic
beverages by anyone within the corporate limits of Southlake,Texas
shall be illegal unless such storage, possession, sale or serving
is on property for which a specific use permit has been issued
under this ordinance.
(c). This ordinance shall not apply to the premises being
used only as "residential" when the storage or serving of alcoholic
beverages is strictly for the consumption of the occupants of the
premises and his or her guests at no charge to said guests.
(d). Except as specifically described in subparagraph (c).
above, the storage, possession, sale or serving of alcoholic
beverages on"prohibited zoned property"hereinafter described
shall be illegal and a specific use permit shall not be granted
therefor whether the storage, possession, sale or serving thereof
is for consumption by anyone either on or off the premises. Such
"prohibited zoned property"heretofore mentioned in this subparagraph
(d) is property zoned "AG" Agricultural District, "A-1" One-Family
District, "A-2" One-Family District, "A-3" One Family District,
"A-6" Two Family District, and "A-10" Multi-Family District, as
set forth in said Ordinance 161.
(e). Anyone desiring a specific use permit in connection with
alcoholic beverages on land zoned other than prohibited zoning as
set forth in subparagraph (d) above shall make written application
for a specific use permit and file the same with the City Secretary.
Such application shall give the name of the owner of the property
and shall be signed by such owner and give the name, address of
the owner and the legal description of the property. Such
application shall further state the type of permit or permits, as-
defined by the Texas Liquor Control Act of the State of Texas
which the applicant is requesting from the Texas Liquor Control
Board and under which the applicant proposes to use such property
in connection with alcoholic beverages. Such application shall
contain such further information as the City Council may require
from time to time by resolution. If,actual operat Q/Q of alcoholic
beverage use is a different person than the owner of ,the property
involved, both the owner and the agent or Lessee of the owner
who will be actually operating the alcoholic beverage use shall
sign said application.
(f). Public hearings, notices, recommendations by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by the City
Council shall be conducted under procedures heretofore provided
otherwise in connection with other applications to change zoning
in this said Ordinance 161 except that the filing fee for each
application shall be the sum of $ 15 .paid at the time
0
of filing and if such permit is.granted a permit fee of $ ri-
per annum shall be due at the time of issuance of said permit. If
said permit is renewed by the date of its expiration without a new
application and public hearings then only the annual permit fee
shall be due at the time of each renewal. The City Council shall
have the right to require new applications and hearings on any
renewal of such specific use permit solely at the discretion of
the City Council upon written notice mailed to the address of the
premises named in such permit not later than 20 days prior to the
expiration date of the permit. Said old permit shall continue in
effect during the normal time period for public hearings and action
by the City Council on the renewal application providing applicant
files the application prior to the expiration date of the old permit.
(g). A specific use permit, if granted by the City Council,
shall be for such period of time as set forth in said permit, not
to exceed one year, and under the terms and conditions designated
in said specific use permit and it is further provided that such
specific use permit is not a permanent zoning of said land but is
merely a specific use permit on such property subject to revocation
as reasonably provided for in said permit. The following acts shall
be grounds for revocation of a permit whether specifically stated.
in the permit or not: (1) Violation of any Alcoholic Beverage Law
of the State of Texas, (2) Violation of any health law of the City
of Southlake, Texas, Tarrant County, or the State of Texas, or,
(3) the maintenance of any public nuisance as defined in the
judicial opinions of the courts of the State of Texas.
(k~). Any such specific use permit issued shall be issued
personally in. the name of the operators of the alcoholic beverage
use and shall not be assignable, transferrable or negotiable in
any manner and shall automatically be void and of no effect if
such alcoholic beverage use is operated by anyone other than the
person named in said permit.
(i). Any person violating or failing to comply with any
provision of this ordinance shall be fined upon conviction, not
less than $1.00 nor more than $200.00 and each day any violation
of non-compliance conditions continues shall constitute a separate
offense.
(j). The word "person" as used in this ordinance shall include
individual persons who have been a citizen of Texas for a period of
at least one year immediately preceding the filing of the permit
application as well as partnerships, corporations, and other business
firms so long as the partnership or other business firm is composed
wholly of persons who have been citizens of Texas for over one year
immediately preceding the filing of said application an V ik.the ease
of corporations, corporations whose stock is owned at least to the.
extent of 51% by persons possessing at least one year citizenry
qualification.
W. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council
of the City of Southlake, Texas, that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable and if
any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section hereof should be
declared unconstitutional, such unconstitutionality or invalidity
shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have
been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such unconstitutional or invalid phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
(1). The said Ordinance 161, except as amended by prior
amendments and this Ordinance No. 161-J"-3 remains in effect
in all--other respects as originally passed.
(m). In view of the recent alcoholic beverage election and
the decision of the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas
that its present zoning ordinances and regulations are inadequate
to properly safeguard the health, morals, peace and general welfare
of the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas in connection with
alcoholic beverage uses creates an emergency for the immediate
preservation of public business, property, health, r;afety-and general
welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall
become effective from and after the date of its passage and publication
and it is accordingly so ordained,
PASSED this ( day of CC f", 1973.
or
ATTEST:
CRy Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
r
4Y i®rney
- 16
Oct. 2, 1973
0o: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmen
subject: Fire Department Report for September, 1973
Emergency Responses
Aircraft Crash I
Automobile Accidents----------------------------------------------3
Automobile Fire I
emergency run to a hospital----(Football injury)------------------I
,;rass Fires------ I
Wash Down (Gasolene Spill)------------------------I
Total , Responses 8
Tot,alttime spent on emergency responses-------------------------- 98man/hours
Civic Work
F►rst-Aid standby at football games-------------------------------5
Count of time spent on the above 63man/houre
RPProx. amount of time spent working .{dame parking lots 50man/hours
Total time spent on Civic Work Tl3man/hours
Department Work
a,.zcar of special training classes------------------------------- 3
rota]. time spent attending classes--(average 17 men per class) --I 14man/hours
Nu.xber of men attend ng Dept. meetings--(average per meeting)----I7
;'o tal time spent on kain'r, work by the kaint. officer and men----73.5man/hour6
Total time spent on Department Work this month 217.Sman/ilours
Approximate number of man/hours spent by this Dept. in Sept.---428.5 Total
Additional Notes
(I) The hose bed on the pumper Lao been modified and an expandable foam unit I
is being added to give us a better 'ange of capabilities at emergencies.
(2) The special training classes are being taught by the Tarrent County I
0 Pire itghters Association training officer, Jay Heard. It consists of a
fifteen hour course of classes and field training.
I
Y I
.Men responding to emergency calla for the month, Senior Fire Fighters:
Chief Steele----------7 Armstrong D.'----3
Asst. Chief Joyce-----2 Chilf J--,-------I
Fire Marshall Weddle--5 Garrett W- -2
Captain Clifton-------5 Hughes D 2
Captain Dodson--------0 Kinchen E------- I
i Lieut. Chelf---------- I Polson R--------3
kaint. Off'. Schirman--7 Record E--------2
Rescue Off.,Schneider-7 Shelton J.------5
Swinney J-------6
Junior Fire Fighters;
l ,
Lieut. Clifton--------2
AndreTs J---------- 6
Polson J-------------- I
Steele R.=------------3
Stevens Be------------I
Respectfully submitted,
He F. Steele, Fire Chief
166
October 1, 1973
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Police Department report for the month of September, 1973
Tickets issued in August 191
Tickets issued in September 157
Fines written in September $39658.50
Fines paid in September 3,501.50
Fines Paid by Highway Patrol 32.50
Persons in jail in August 37
Persons in jail in September 23
Traffic Accidents in August 10
Traffic accidents in September 12 '
Burglaries investigated in August 0
Burglaries investigated in September 2
Approx. total value taken in burglaries in September $137.00 t
Approx. total value recovered in burglaries in Sept. 137.00
Thefts investigated in August 2 '
Thefts investigated in September 3
Approx. total value taken in thefts in Sept. $1030.00
® Approx. total value recovered in thefts in Sept. 445.00 '
Number of calls in August 153
Number of Calls in September 179
Miles driven in August 11,205 '
Miles driven in September 10,310
Speedometer reading on Unit #3 (73 Ford) 519205 ,
Speedometer reading on Unit #4 (72 Ford) 118,790
Respectfully submitted '
Dou as Hughes, Chief
Southlake Police Department t
DH/jd
167
i
i
RESOLUTION NO. 73-27
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of
Southlake, Texas, contracted for the con-
struction of an overhead water storage tank
j with Chicago Bridge & Iron Company on the
20th day of Febr.ry, 1973; And,
WHEREAS, Partial Estimate #4 has been
presented for payment at this time; And,
i
WHEREAS, Gerald Lemons, engineer with the
City's consultant firm of Carter & Burgess,
Inc., has recommended that such payment in
j the amount of $7,250.00 be made; Now,
I I
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
1.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to make payment to Chicago
Bridge & Iron Company on Partial Estimate #4 in the amount of
$7,250.00.
2.
The funds for such payment are to be taken from the Bond Funds
set aside for this purpose.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of October, 1973.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
OP
w
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
October 2, 1973
TO THE HON. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
At a regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission
held September 25, 1973, it was unanimously approved to
recommend a change in zoning from Ag District to F District
as requested by James Turner Company, Inc., on two acres of
land, more or less, owned by said company and described by
metes and bounds in ZA-73-8.
Present for the Commission: R. W. Mussina, Chairman
Lloyd Wolf, Secretary
Manuel Gonzalez
Gayl Hargadine
C.M.Gordon (arriving late)
i
I
1
RESOLUTION NO. 73-28
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake filed a
lawsuit against the City of Grapevine
in the 17th District Court of Tarrant
County, Texas, entitled Cause No. 17-
8539-71; And,
WHEREAS, the petition filed on behalf
of the City of Southlake alleged im-
proper annexation attempts by the City
of Grapevine; And,
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the
City of Grapevine have reached an agree-
ment prior to a trial of said Cause; Now,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
A judgment be entered on behalf of the City of Southlake,
Texas, in Cause No. 17-8539-71, in the 17th District Court
of Tarrant County, Texas, a copy of which is attached hereto
as "Exhibit A".
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of October, A. D. 1973.
6al~c xeez;~_~
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
170
i
RESOLUTION NO. 73-29
AREAS, the City Council of the City of
Southlake, Texas, deems it necessary to j
have the city offices maintained in a
clean and healthful condition; And,
WHEREAS, provision for janitorial services
have been made in the 1973-74 Budget; Now,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUT$LAKE, TEXAS:
1.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to,contract for janitorial i
services with the Washington Janitor Service.
2.
Such service is to be performed once a week and payment for
same is $25.00 per week.
J
3.
The costs for such services are to be paid out of the General
Fund as provided in the 1973-74 Budget.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of October, A. D. 1973.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
a~~~4%"'e'llG
Al
MUM. JUMS-16M
Mrs. *Rll&Ce Datasz J"q 1, 1 qT~
P.0 BM "t
Siu ato Tomas 76051 deb: Soati1aim City Ball
I hereby u4bait speelt cat eft and ostimato o for janitorial sorv so
of bailf Ls fed abo e , : . , _
Sorvico is to be pat orid" an f 1) day per waft e.
Once por wook *le" algid m fI~* std restates
Ali 3abo1+, cleaning supplies and equip ast naeesdar" is party
abowo work', sill be f steed bf WAS11110TON JANITOR SUVTCTs.
WE PROPOSE id! furnish labor and material = complete in'adcoidance 44& abo4'ispecincations, and subject to
condltid it'Ydund on both sides' of this agreement, for the sum of:
hti~nty--f J re and MVMS lker~ weak dollars AS+as
1 ,aymennt made as follows:
I ACCEPTED. The above prkes specifications and. conditions are satisfac• RespectfuNy submitted,
tory - and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do Me work as
specified. Payment wiH,be made as outlined above. {Read reverse side). -
WASHMIMMOMS"M
I Date of Acceptance
-3
By r, ' B
I 66 , y
I By-Mayo '-T-F.'ity--of geut-ha ke ►rob:7nb wopeeal M" 6 aMWre"ft ua it. not accepW winwt_ darn.
A