Loading...
Item 6A - Presentation0% CITY VF IBSOUTHL,A Item 6A Zoning Change and Development Plan for Trademark Southlake ZA25=0045 FI y � f _ C�RDEN 1 ' •, fill i "s :A.7- .5'' T ... WHE�� f� CLEARY Sl 2 Y � 1 I, % W. Kirkwood Blvd. Street View - Looking South MT' AA, State Highway 114 Street View - -.. Lo . oki'n .2� Low Denkfy Residential Office Commercial Medium Densi Residential .�. Density' Residential; Mixed Use mixea use mt F � ------------------ Future Land Use • The Campus Office overlay category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the use of high -quality, medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses and their ancillary uses and structures. This district is inherently suited for the development of built - to -suit office developments 100,000 square feet or larger for the use of corporate or regional headquarters, professional services firms, financial firms, information technology and media companies, biomedical companies, and other users which drive demand for medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses. • Generally characterized by 2-4 story buildings that have a floor -to -area ratio (FAR) under 1, with highly integrated green space as a key feature of the design, parking structures or underground parking dispersed and/or separated from the main building, horizontally -integrated floor plans, more subdued low -impact building design, and the presence of multiple buildings or building wings if accomplished in an environmentally sensitive manner. Amenities such as walking trails, open space, plazas, water features, special roadway and sidewalk treatments, and unique landscaping should be incorporated into the development. 11 Site Recommendation ,r�rrr 114 Corridor and Wellness -Medical Overlay and ®Restaurant Specialty Retail Overlay Campus Office Overlay Multi -Tenant Office Overlay High -Rise Office Overlay O/ /! Mixed Medical and Office /Z Overlay 11 IIIIIf11 Jntinnal Land uqp Catponry — c.amnu-q The Employment Center 1 (EC-1) category is intended for the highest intensity of commercial and employment uses immediately adjacent to S.H. 114, while Employment Center 2 (EC-2) is intended for a medium intensity mix of uses that transition from EC-1 or S.H. 114 to EC-R or lower intensity residential neighborhoods. Scale and Context: ' ➢ 2 — 4 story buildings ➢ 4 — 6 story buildings ➢ Small scale retail uses shall be located at key intersections. ➢ Larger -format retail uses (with footprints larger than 40,000 s.f.) shall be located adjacent to the arterial or highway with pedestrian entrances from internal streets. Character and Design: Legend ➢ Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly. RC ➢ Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10'. EC-1 ➢ Sidewalks shall be 6' — 8' with a linear planting strip for street trees. EC-2 ➢ Parking to be limited to on -street parking and surface parking - EC-R to the rear of buildings. ➢ Parking garages are encouraged over surface parking lots. �, \ n u ae LAs, Legend AG cl RES =I C2 RE7 M C3 SFIA C4 SFlB NRPUD SF2 M HC SF30 Bi SF20A A 52 SF20B 4w RPUD 12 MH SPI L-L-i MF2 SP2 M H DT .1832 d fVT t 11311 25 2 3&N I � i, . 1 B.2-D '. �, cs TZD i 01 ECZ 02 • Ila Ion 01. 1 .1 Ako k1 �TaPi&7R 1 rl� 1 m I - 2 m ;w • Purpose: The Employment Center Zoning District implements the goal for the S. H 114 corridor of the Southlake 2025 Plan — Phase II to create an employment center (EC) land use category that provides a tiered approach to development along the highway corridor. • Intent • Encourage mixed -use development (office, retail, hospitality, residential). • Promote corporate campuses and quality commercial design. • Protect natural features and integrate open space. • Create pedestrian- and bicycle -friendly environments. • District Components: • Commercial Core (EC-C): High -intensity retail, office, and mixed -use. • Edge (EC-E): Office, residential, limited retail. • Neighborhood (EC-N): Residential with transitions to existing neighborhoods. • Open Space: Parks, greens, plazas, preserves (min. 15% of site). • Development Standards: Flexible guidelines for streets, blocks, building heights, parking, and design emphasizing walkability / and connectivity. Exemptions include: Screening & Fencing, Bufferyards, Overlay Zones, Parking Requirements, and certain Subdivision Ordinance requirements. �• �.A�.. .... TMTMa 1 ' •' ,�„ � 4 �. - '�. Ijl Ijl Ijl Ijl Ijl Ijl L_ AL- . ..... . c-1 02� RA I I � ] 1 1 c-1a1 J-J l _ ' r E 1(IRKWOOD BLVI) aa. AIL C C JIL_ LIL _11 ................ ........ . ................................................ C-1a3 .' C-104 9 jl jl II t IJ �Li LE L 'i y I i A L AL?J. -77f 'r_______ �lil I Jill ------------------ Overall Proposed Development Lot 1. To be defined in --- - _ � the future Lot 4: : f'.. / I I I w J, / 1_L__ C-102--J,-�,; I� Single 1 Family ,LJ �� ��,. i Residential / C-101 .�. T r� - =-- (�13,246 SF EKIRKWOD Lot 2. ' ti ,� �� Q _... _ �, -- -_ - Lot Area) Lull Retail/ Restaurant - - - �,, - I r Lot 5: Single Family Lot 3: —�_�_i�__ ___ Residential \ tIi r Office/ o j� I i (-10,960 SF Lot Area) C Restaurant _ — I Po; �7111 I= I IrMTV Al-=y, n i `r --it �rrrrrr--1rrrr �s � - � til ICI lil ICI ICI ICI ICI I ; � I d. � I �, - �y 0� 1 - • 1�e0 2. '1•. ,�� 11 �• - 7 EKIRKWOOOBLVO - -AIF J'L- J'L- --I --------------- r�r�r�r� a 1 ' —1 U.11 it1'b. 1 I i �I l I 14 I JJliJJIJJJJ �I I I a,wr IIII--------- LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ■ M M I• M M 11111111 ■ PROPOSED PUBLIC 9 SIDEWALK m m� m m � = PROPOSED PUBLIC 5 SIDEWALK - - - - - - PROPOSED PRIVATE SIDEWALK LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PUBLIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPERTY LINE Mi II I'i'Q E KIRKWOOD BLN V IN % -I Tree Preservation Calculations Ste Data AC 8F Total Ste Area 40.21 1751512 Total Tree Lbvr Arca 1.39 80941.E Area of Reposed Tree Preservation 0.16 7184.7 Tree Cover Preservation RequiredM P"AdDd(SF) Ftmroentageofebsting tree cover on entiresite 3.61% 50441.8 Hie. %of edstingtree cover to be preserved " 11-8% 4230D 7184.7 -rm. ,,'a, r s'W The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; III. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees if ny, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; ,r j X"KNN N1'\i X X f/ j v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. No Text PLANT DMEOIILE PROPEFr-LIKE - - - - 's. i .�,7r h.,.. i- "raw _ — `- •eOEnC-aG 5 •E KIRKW06 lid Imo— _ _ j Cr I I I I.i �' , �'�4.0 -����"°�•kl .+� �• � rw`elna i Lip 1 •4� Gyp -- -- =�`= - - - ---_- - - - m�a ca�wirurarxnc par. � aroc � n� was>� wr!•� oM �-v• n rem mac m.o. carol norarx�xc wr. � �rc aancums '—'— - Sb�dp1mRp..w RQN[ tm^eP1'Teel t9lF iwn a,.e s..meyu„ 1pM7Y�+F1 amme,e sr,a.m Rorrevde'c e'ho.en^�exa t mpy a�mrm*�x� Lnena[ahwi7kAen Rentiiq bIX�NwRwisWw Mwp 'o , nwr�ramF R�uMehoe '�' , � r�mrThu w�nyMawr»ecav 1heel Nrkjrtp rde..p n�amaron�cing on arq i IX Qafinghwna Eaili ]L�(tplee I , • ,' ti .�� ="T°R""" PROPERTY LENE TT- = 0��- .`'r;�: i;.� _ _ _gyp► E NIRKWOO CBM o _ �a r Open Space Calculations Site Data AO SF Total Ste Area 4021 1751512 Open Space Required (SF) Pravided(SF) 15% 19% 262727 1 324232 • Existing Zoning AG —Agricultural Proposed Zoning ECZ — Employment Center District Land Use Designation Mixed Use Gross Acreage (AC) 40.21 acres Net Acreage (AC) 33.16 acres Commercial: 21.85 acres Percentage of Site Coverage 82% Area of Open Space (AC) 7.25 acres (ECZ Standard: Flexible) Open Space as a Percentage 18% o (ECZ Standard: 15/o Min.) Total Building Area 149,528 SF Area by Use Restaurant 55,687 SF Retail 18,551 SF Grocery 33,798 SF Office 41,492 SF Parking and Loading Spaces 986 (879 excluding Lot 1) Total Number of Residential Lots 37 Residential Density *ECZ has no density requirement ' • • ' • • ' • 1 0.92 Units/AC 1.11 Units/AC 2.41 Units/AC 2.65 Units/AC • Bldg.1 TBD TBD ;TBD Bldg. 2 1 Restaurant 2,861 SF Bldg. 3 1 Restaurant 3,914 SF Bldg. 4 1 Grocery 33,798 SF Bldg. 5 1 Retail 18,551 SF ✓.\ �`� jarl, 1 , ,-7� ,i i LUG R� BLDG 3 Restaurant METAL CANOPY DECORATIVE GOOSENECK LIGHTING PAINTED ERICK HORIZONTAL PANELS - WOOD FINIEHCOLOR TEO IIE411 N 1H SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation HORIZONTAL PANELS- PAINTED BRICK WOOD FINISH COLOR TED ��m �0011M1"Mm 11111■ PAINTED BRICK HORIZONTAL PANELS FINISH COLOR TRO Facing Bldg. 3 (Southeast) Elevation HORIZONTAL PANELS- W000 FINISH COLOR TED Side Parking (Northwest) Elevation Interior Parking (Northeast) Elevation Restaurant BLDG 2 BLDG 3 j SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation Interior Parking (Nu1 Uileast) Elevation Side Parking (Southeast) Elevation Facing Bldg. 2 (Northwest) Elevation lilt ff1/1/////X.; Alirm Ti IX T OF1111 W Hn milli It IN 0 INN; qNZ- E?� AIM st- , dwell design studio O Building 4 — Grocer Front Elevation (Southwest) STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF LW PAINTED BRICK PP) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 3-COAT STUCCO FINISH - FAINI COLOR TBD. TYPICAL Building 4 & 5 — Side Elevation (Southeast) 5, Scale, 1/16`=1' 3-0DAT STUCCO FINISH- STANDING SEAM METAL PAINT COLOR TBD, TYP ROOF l�T�t�,le Gr,�ocye�r 57 0" Building 4 — (Grocer) Side Elevation (Northwest) 3-COAT STUCCO FINISH - PAINT COLOR TRH, TYP IIIIIIIIIIIIIM Building 4 — Rear Elevation (Northeast) 31COAT STUCCO FINISH PAINT COLOR THH, TYP Building 5 — Rear Elevation (Northeast) PERFORATED METAL RTV SCREEN mERGARTF RGARTE iT` OF'JIMIST RU075 riKIW-€CLC jig VnI Mal INS ANN- s - � _ -•�.. � �.-. ,,. -�..f, �, may; Velf, Ci I�#'1 � a, � _ .y.�.� 4 til � _� � � �. -. f • - - 'w .����� � � � • 1. � ._ Bldg. 6 1 Restaurant 6,000 SF Bldg. 7 1 Restaurant 7,500 SF Bldg. 8 1 Restaurant 12,598 SF Bldg. 9 1 Restaurant 1,554 SF Bldg. 10 1 Restaurant 5,100 SF 2-3 Office 10,200 SF Bldg. 11 1 Restaurant 6,646 SF 2-3 Office 13,292 SF Bldg. 12 1 - 3 Office 18,000 SF s\7 Park Area P➢—a,v. REFER TO 1AN0.4CAPE PIA18 OF FUR �EFAll.4 w ti Bldg. 13 Restaurant m 9,514 SF j R A e 1ze 1s• �„� 9 �. Es•. ze• fe• fo• ev I 11 1d LQT3,1C A 15 q gm,ICRE9 y IOT,=B9 9F ' . FrJ—J �, FM � I ayy - ■■ ' _ 0 F � b I C%ISTING [gNGiET —1 1 E{ i „ O IISE. CDMMERCIA T �jj hp — �.,`o,.... ji 1V 1M�EPCF[ilpl OFlf%41-IID . F 20'M➢E RICMAF�MAY FA^EMEM.jl;�NE — — � TRFWLilrl'EIECiHC WAPEFAIIVE,INC. VAPYBLEYrtIIX �Wy YOL fl913.vG 114] ACCE�B.IfR.RY AW S D.RT.U.r ➢RAMI6E E�8EYEM Restaurants 'OtHIMIM: 0 0;1700� HOMMUMMIM: HHOU CHUH INUM: Building 6 & 7— Street A Elevation (Northwest) S70NEVENEER Building 6 & 7— SH 114 Elevation (Southwest) \\ M111!!f111.!l//1�C Restaurants BLDG 7 BLDG 6 \ c, 8' DEEP ALUMINUM VERTICAL PANELS- WOOD COPINGCORNICE FINISH COLOR TED PROFILE I STONEVENEER I STOREFRONT A LUMINUM WINDOWS PERFORATED METAL RTU SCREEN BRICK (COLOR TBD) 110'-114" Building 7— Side Elevation (Northeast) STOREFRONT VERTICAL PANELS -WOOD PERFORATED METAL RTU 1101RG71VEGOOSEHECK ALUMINUM WINDOWS FINISH COLOR TBD .BEEN 1 KI O" Building 6 & 7— Park Facing Elevation (Southeast) imomil men owns :: �iIii HII Ionlose iiii i 1o�[ one memo in miloss long long �� ' ���� ' ���� ' ���� H ff _�loomeni ' :mmili ' �111, inloof ilom; monsoon 1■■■ n,nsns■ iiii ■nsnsi moans■ ■■nsmo insooi��• ___- =__= n,ri■ =_== =___ -___ ___= iiii __- -__= loan iiii ins■■ ins■, ■ions, ■ions, i1a1 a■■, momons, inns N iiii ,ins■ ISM local loans, ■nsoo■ iiii lnsnsi iiii inns w monsoon, monsoon, ■III 'II' II'� Iloilo Iloilo lnslolo iiii lolo w ilolo, Iloilo ins iiii ,loci n,lololo iiii ■nsN Lot 3 — Building 8 Elevations soon ■■■I i■� i■■I� I��I■ ■■1■ I■■I soon II■I inns. ■Ins -I■I■- IIII WWII OHIO, Illinois Ross I11001111 1 1 ■ 1 UNION 1 1 monsoon, I111m1 I1S1■ NOSE soon II I■■I Lot 3 — Building 8 Elevations Restaurant METAL ROOF WITH WOOD PERFORATED METAL RTU SOFFIT SCREEN �30'4�" CANTILEVER OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST MELAL CLADDING STOREFRONT �y� o ALUMINUM WINDOWS TU BLDG 8 SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation RN 'J�CTAL'_ADDING CANTILEVER OPEN WEE STEEL JOIST ITT WOOD I (STOREFRONT ALUMINUM WINDOWS PERFORATED METAL RTU METAL CLADDING -STOREFRONT METAL ROOF WITH WOOD SCREEN ALUMINUM WINDOWS SOFFIT Bldg. 8 Facing (Northeast) Elevation METAL ROOF WITH WOOD METAL CLADDING PERFORATED METAL RTU SOFFIT SCREEN Side Parking (Southeast) Elevation Park Facing (Northwest) Elevation D KBRONZ ALUM FASCIA OARR RR E A Uw STOREFROM SYSTEM WITH AU NNUM SPANDREL PANELS PAINTED CORRUGATED METALPANELTO SCREEN R7 AND VERRCAL CORE x LOT 3. SLOC GLASS AND BLDG IG 9350 ACRE ALUMINUM RAILING SYSTEM dB�.. 5 \' CEMENTTTOUS WDOOttINE \ PAHE!-COLOR THO SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation rl!N T -■m i�� ■M ■■ �■ ■� ■■ �■ ■� ■■ � 1n III mills 1111 11 11 11 11 11 oil ■m 11■ M■■� ■■ M■ ■� ■■ M■ MEN! ■■ 11111 SEE INN III Em No Mims Mim1 Millis mmsm No M11PR !11 111 III ■1 11 Em sip ME 111111 No ■1iIn11 11 ME�WI NIT r. r.: 111111111 _ru 1■■■■ ONION MEMO ■1N■■ MEMO III! 111 ���� 11! 111 Ii�I1 IIII � Restaurant Space Er ON MI■'■IM ■■ IM■ ■SE 1 ■■ ME am ■■ m■�■ ■■ MI■ ■m ■■ MI■ ■IM 11,III,11,II1, MEMO ■m MEMO ■m �1,11 �■n ■■ M■ �■m ■■ on am ■■ m ■■ m■ ■m ■■ M■ ■m ■■ 1■„1,1 I,11,1�I,11 NE ■■ AM ■m go W■ ■W we WON■ENNE NEENNESE 11111PPRPI W04111I1 Lot 3 —Buildings 10,, 11,, and 12 Elevations aL�Ga Lo 1 BLOC BL➢G 10 350 ACR uu55 5 �. \� eLoc iv Bldg. 8 Facing (Northwest) Elevation Side Drive Thru / Parking (Southeast) A�NST°�PELS- tiET�L`� Elevation TWAT REfAL LWIL(LIN.0 uraoo EH caLORTeo Ralac orrvE / UNOPYAN�Ol11U0IXt pRIVE THRIl5TEEL PATIO CANOPY SLPORTEQ CC- STEEL CCWWJS rYNT _ I 5 wyn 1141111� min i 'i■r _ -~� _Vi�.-vP^�_.s;�` , �.T. �. � ram, ... _ R 1 /•'"^�.. " k sit 'lift ` 1l d l owl : tea; :� ■■■■Ilii ! Epp MI, -01 mr •� r ` 46 1• 4, 1.` dwell WOW design 9studio —"Now�� - _ �r�■ r f ! La pjL r zt s i - _ oil,Ur W I - dwell design _, studio Lot 4—tea 4 f L's Mj �` I �i a� ��'��� i ,T� r p �--_-i--- JAI _ •� ,I h Lots i. I: . I W _I _ I- I Single Family Residential Number of Lots 12 25 37 Open Space Lots 3 3 (2 shown) 6 Open Space Area 0.42 AC 1.03 AC 1.45 AC Residential Density 2.41 Units/AC 2.65 Units/AC - Overall Residential Density 2.53 Units/AC Minimum Lot Area 12,035 SF 10,000 SF - Maximum Lot Area 0.363 AC 0.423 AC - Average Lot Area 13,246 SF 10,960 SF - 5 1 { I I 1 E e Ian '. .. ; LOT 1 LOT 2 {t Una LOT 3 1 LOT 4 1 LOT S LOT E 1 LOT 7n 0 .... . I1I 11I I I I11 I11 6 ........ ..... +....... ........ ... ..... �.'.f. .I` xII I Min. Lot Size: ::::•�, ---- i i - - I F y'I I'I -�-12 035 SF $ III 9 III 10 � 11 III 12 ti � 5 .. .. ........ ... a...—. f ............... ...................... { . .... .. ... .. ...... , ... .. .„. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... EKYhtW60D BLV6= s o .. 5. 1 MATCHLINE SEE SHEETC-104 \ / \! X X X X \ \ \ \ 1 I I I I I I I I 11 MATCH LINE !WE SHEET G101----i-- g 15 II iIi 16 illi 17 I 3 `,, _ JIB---J L---J'L---J'L--� I 80' x 125' AG��\NE l n \�\ \ �� ® -�" '\%%�f" �- Min. Lot Size: 4 > , I 10,000 SF ; I 18 I I 1 I I 20 Ill 21 , + 5 ICI L— —J L— — L---J L- VI J I ;i r— —L1r— —AIL— —�Ir— —� 6 i • i...,:.c ��. 22 Ill III 24 III III 25 r 7 ICI L L— ICI L---J ICI L---J� 4� ,1 ---J _J .P I - i o� y � �tifi< 9 I11Ir III 10 I`I, 11 41I I�I 12 11I �I 13 III �I 14 I � I �� i m III �T ' I,I k. i' . IBM will i r Syr .f•. • :llv�t\ No Text r K •J' Y r TIMw - J •. - r y* ' 1 mom a 4" h 4k `r ! �"'� - _ • tea. ry r lJr. NONE on NN P E!t NONE NN NN MEMO 1. jn y✓�r i7�� ✓ - r N 4 MEMO �A■■ ■■ ■ logo OEM ;y S At At IL No Text . . . . . . . . . . . . At. NORM 4i MVP At jor NMI -in Permitted Uses: • Single Family Residential • Grocer • Restaurant • Retail • Hotel (full -service hotel as stated in City's Land Use Plan) • Office • Medical Office Building • Medical • Drive -Through (only for financial/banking use with the canopy also serving as a fully furnished outdoor patio on the second level) • Gas Station Single Family Residential: • Building Height: 2 Stories maximum (excluding basements) or 35 ft. • Setbacks • Front:25' • Side:8' • Rear:30' • Block Dimensions: Less than 1,200 feet (unless limited by unique site conditions such as topography and vegetation) • Lot Area: Varies; Typical '/4 acre, 0.229 ac min. • Lot Width and Depth: 80' Typ., Min. 69' wide on pie shaped lots, measured at Front setback; 125' deep • Maximum Lot Area: 0.43 ac • Maximum Lot Coverage: 40% • Maximum Impervious Cover: 60% Building Standards (All Other Uses): • Building Height: 18' minimum (including parapet); 65' maximum • Exceptions: Up to 90 feet maximum height shall be allowed for buildings meeting the following requirements: (a) entirely or partially within 1100 feet of the northern boundary of S.H. 114; and (b) no closer to E. Kirkwood Boulevard than 300 feet. • Setbacks: • Front: 50' along SH 114 • Side: Varies (See Development Plan) • Rear: Varies (See Development Plan) • All other uses (Measured from edge of Right -of -Way) • N. White Chapel Blvd: 10' minimum, but may Planning Director • E. Kirkwood Blvd: N/A • SH 114: 50' minimum be reduced with approval from Open Space Standards: • Required 15% minimum of the overall gross District acreage. • Dedicated park land, hardscape plazas, fountain areas, and amenitized detention pond, and other enhanced hardscape areas, will qualify as open space. Off -Street Parking Requirements: • Restaurant: One (1) space per 150 SF of GFA • Retail: One (1) space per 200 SF of GFA • Office: One (1) space per 300 SF of GFA Parking Space Dimension: • 9' x 18' minimum for head -in and angled parking. ����M 01���� 401 Although the ECZ District allows for flexibility, the district provides specific guidance for development. The following are applicable standards that are requested deviations from the ECZ guidelines: MWO 1 Cul-de-sacs are prohibited in ECZ districts A dead-end street is proposed in the northern residential (Table 49-2) area. A drive through facility is requested for a regional bank that 2 Finance, insurance, and real estate establishments will serve as the anchor tenant for the office building permitted with no drive through facility (Table 49-1) The drive through canopy will also serve as a fully furnished outdoor patio on the 2nd level of the office building. 3 Gasoline service stations excluded as a permitted "Gas Station is included as an allowed use. use (Table 49-1) ECZ permits a maximum building height in the EC-C 4 of 5 stories, or up to 6 stories if the dedicated open A maximum height of 90 feet for buildings closest to S.H. 114 space exceeds 15% and/or there is significant preservation of tree stands (Table 49-2) 5 Tree Preservation & Landscape Plans as presented $Mt�1�1,�j���♦ The applicant is requesting variances for the following: • Driveway Ordinance No. 634 - stacking depth variance where a minimum 100' is required. I {i I� / _ -L,- I �'` JAL-_ JIL-- JL ,{ Q ! cr 3, -�ptiorj�L1 ( urr�nt Iroplasa!)j j ��t- �;� ptin j jll IW I. ` -�--.- _ ©.—..T. © .� � I = • I i i ��-_ ram, ©.—.�©..... � j _ is a. i -E I rl -T— ee. SIGNIFIGANI GONCE HN CONGERNTHAT 0.GREEAPLE SOWTION i'OR LnMNLNT HOME FCH RBILRY TO ENTER CROSS.TRAFFIC WILL OWNERS IS FOR TRADEMARK TO ADD AN I.AMSERTSITE WITHMILD IN CREASESTACKINGAT ADDITIONAL APPROACH IN THIS LOCATION. THgFFIC LAMBERT NE ENTRY1 DNMPSTER ENCLOSURE WOULD NEED TO BE REDUCE ABUW TO GET RELOCATED INTOSITE ® _ '-- I SiONIFICANT SAFETY LAMBERT HOME 5ITE DONCERNFUH CUTHTHROUGH TRAFFIC WHEN N, WHILE CHAPEL ` ISSACKEDUP, � I , in I ---- - f"-_--'-- - - -- --- NORTH AGCESSTOCORNERLGTIS I ALREADY FHROUGH L MBER1 j I HOME PRGPERTY Drivpwav ❑ For: Opposed: Undecided: Within 200' — 1 Responsein Opposition Outside 300' — 5 Responses in Favor 51d S11 r10 ._b .I �504 -- J�395395 v - L 200 190 - 1710 - _ _. _ -W8 _ 109 -ILO_ IN nexP, 1l2 _ y,�HEELEAs OA 102 0 318 _ 520D9 IL7 13 _ z0A5 1.3 109 IDs 10] 4 zdOs 20a 16 12 14 15 10 13 108 1975 L 17 o 104 19fi5 p; 00 18 19 L00 K1Rr(W000 BLVD -K R%WOOD 101 t6T - - - 1838 - - - 710 100 t 108 11P 116 12D 124 200 204 208 212 LA MoILA Cr k01 105 109�113 117 121 125 201 205 209 213 20 1822 - -- — 100 IN 108i112 116 120 124 200 209 208 212 MUMNO PL 101 1 5 109 153 117 t21 125 201 205 209 21 211 1 I1 — tAp2. 2L 17s1 1671 � I I 100 23 1660 � L 111 .. - 7 9G I y CITY 4F SOUTHLAK Applicant's Presentation Applicant's Video Drive 1 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - B • AM Peak Hour - 10.0 • PM Peak Hour - 12.0 Drive 1A • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - A • AM Peak Hour - 9.8 • PM Peak Hour - 11.3 Drive 2 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - A • AM Peak Hour - 8.7 • PM Peak Hour - 9.0 Drive 3 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - A • AM Peak Hour - 8.7 • PM Peak Hour - 8.8 Drive 4 • EX. LOS - C • Prop LOS - C • AM Peak Hour - 55.8 • PM Peak Hour - 99.8 Drive 5 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - B • AM Peak Hour -10.2 • PM Peak Hour - 12.1 Drive 6 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - B • AM Peak Hour - 10.1 • PM Peak Hour - 12.1 Drive 7 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - B • AM Peak Hour - 9.8 • PM Peak Hour - 10.4 Drive 8 • EX. LOS - N/A • Prop LOS - A • AM Peak Hour - 8.5 • PM Peak Hour - 8.6 E. Kirkwood and N. White Chapel Intersection • EX. LOS - C • Prop LOS - F (Signalized Intersection Required) • AM Peak Hour - 573.8 • PM Peak Hour - 320.1 r DRIVE 7 DRIVE 6 \ DRIVE 1 RIVE 8 -7-7 I-+----,— i' DRIVE 3 02 \� E. Kirkwood Blvd. DRIVE 1A AL JAL `DRIVE 2 i i- C-103 \ - � �m ��r,-' I "\ U 104 rl a DRIVE 5 F- �I. DRIVE 4 I I - y I Il r• 0 • � I I II �• � II f m yr ya ** I-wI T I I rnmrrrrrrnTrrl}Illurnr. ��� �`a;". \ j IIIII II II III l.f111111111if J I �'. \, � "s,•� /� `� �TTTfLfiLrTlITTfTf1��+_ � __� ,� nr - 4�7- oil ul \ �- �``�'`�;�: f � ��II IIIIIIIINIII IInll 11 lrl 11 lulu•:. '�I _i . 1 _ � _ 1 ---- IL -J, i i f E KIRKWOOD LEGEND — — — — PROPERTY LINE 675.00 FFE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEVATION g7.00 PROPOSED BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXPOSED FACE OF RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONTOUR — — — — — — EXISTING CONTOUR ___ _- _:MI LEGEND ■������■ e.o..a oxwwemnce 7 .. \1 ^mob m� ¢ _____ " I =•Y I Existing Drainage\� I Proposed Drainage {1 ,,� Existing Sewer Line ����_ -- - -- -- -- �- _ -- - -_ Proposed Sewer Line I _ I Proposed 8-inch Sewer Line 1' Proposed 6-inch Sewer Line I� - = TI I L' • EKIRKMOID BLuo Propo�kd 6-inch Sewer Line 1 '1 a I 1 1 1 11 I i CI i! '..�, I '::.a. xisting 8-inch Sewer Line .Proposeh44nch Sewer Line ` fl ,``�,\ � ,� . �. ,,, = • -Proposed 8-inch Ll t11ll11t111W11LC I I I I I I i l i i i L - _ 1 ..Fxisting12-inch Water Line _----a� PrODO.ed 72-inc (Wafter Line -A -- Propolsed 8-inch Vl1ater yne g ,�! II Existin 12-inch Waterline ed9\� On to fR �,�• ._ �,�� 5 �. '- F EKIkKWD6LVn Proposed 12-'--h Watei Lrn'e. -- - - Proposed 12-inch Water Line71 , ?�y I Proposed 8-inch Water Line - S li I°d li i Propose" -inch Water Line i �' i---- r--, �- .,- -- r--- Existing Water Line Proposed Water Line omri. on®� w a I __ 1. a E KIRKWOOD ELv[) l \ 1 11 II 1WMIL - i v ► 1 a V I y 1❑I�ululu V II �p \\\`� \ i i � .i A � � �_ •- , jam_ O � I —'! ' \�� �"'�^�;' � • �.'� � fIIII II II II II nII II II II II IfI � � � °� � I _miriYllT�]1<LW111LI1L '❑,�� ��..��'.;=:� � `� �.,.s,�. ,. .. F ICI � I j I Utility Storm Plan sill A F.jp. • r AA Acreage (AC) - 2.99 acres 9.51 acres 9.35 Building Height & Building Floor Area EC Commercial Core: 5 stories (maximum) To Be Defined in Future Detailed Site Plan per Applicant Building 2 — Single Story — 2,861 sf Building 6 — Single Story — 6,000 sf Building 7 — Single Story — 7,500 sf EC Edge: 3 stories (maximum) ) Building 3 — Single Story — 3,914 sf Building 8 — Single Story — 12,598 sf Building9 — Single Story— 1,554 sf Building 4 —Single Story — 33,798 sf Building 10 — Three Story — 15,300 sf EC Neighborhood: 2 stories (maximum) Building11 —Three Story— 19,938 sf Building 5 —Single Story — 18,551 sf Buildin 12 —Three Stor — 18,000 sf guilding 13 — Single Story — 9,514 sf Total Building Area - - 59,124 sf 90,404 sf SF Broken Down by Use _ Retail: 52,349 sf Office: 41,492 sf Restaurant: 6,775 sf Restaurant: 48,912 sf Parking and Loading Spaces per Development Standards Flexible To Be Defined in Future Detailed Site Plan per Applicant Restaurant: 1 space per 100 SF of GFA Restaurant: 1 space per 100 SF of GFA Retail: 1 space per 200 SF of GFA Office: 1 space per 300 SF of GFA Total Required: 307 spaces Total Required: 464 spaces Parking Provided - 374 Spaces 505 Spaces RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS - NORTHSIDE .10 ■ 1 Subdivision Name Cliffs At Clariden Ranch Zoning RPUD Total Lots 55 Lot smaue at 19,372 Size (Sq Ft.) Average 26,308 Largest 66,385 Gross Acreage 55.53 Gross Net Density Acreage* 1 0.99 33.14 N et Density 1.66 2 Kirkwood Hollow RPUD 150 15,484 23,464 63,521 115.03 1.30 3 Oak Pointe RPUD 26 19,274 25,104 35,378 26.99 0.96 15.09 1.72 4 Wingate Hill SF-1A 24 42,848 46,997 93,362 29.85 0.80 5 Loch Meadow Estates SFAA 24 43,560 50,190 84,313 31.04 0.77 6 Lonesome Dove Estates RPUD 150 12,179 17,185 63„077 82.40 1.82 58.50 2.56 7 The Conservation RPUD 8 51,477 71,819 93,835 13.10 0.61 12.07 0.66 8 Unmar Estates RPUD 10 25,041 37,740 54,191 10.85 0.92 8.63 1.16 * Not ACreage excludes public rlght-of-way and operr space lots where lnWmation is available. 0 TotaL Lot Size (Sq Ft.) Gross Gross Net Net ID Subdivision Name Zoning Lots smauest Average Largest Acreage Density Acreage* Density • Building 1 not identified, formerly shown as a "hotel" — amenities and hotel type not provided. • Three kiosks are requested to be permitted but location has not been identified on development plan. • Max building height in feet for residential has not been identified (35 ft is typical). • Buildings 1 and 13 have not included all information needed for a Site Plan approval as part of the overall Development Plan. Future Site Plan approval will be required prior to obtaining a building permit. • Differentiate the private drive from the roundabout so it does not resemble a public street r'�;)TY l J 1 I '1E Tuscan Ridge 5 MH 11.35 -8,000 N/A 57 Carillon Parc* 5 ECZ 15.8* 5,600 N/A 79 (Min. 4,950) Crescent Royale 3.22 RPUD 53.74* 7,200 7.35 (14%) 173 Phase 1&2 (Timarron)* (Min. 6,000) Tealwood 2.77 TZD 5.4 10,000 .62 (12.8%) 15 Brenwyck II (Timarron)* 2.5 RPUD 44.78* 11,000 1.33 112 Ridgeview 2.34 TZD 13.22 -11,500 2.76 (20.88%) 31 Watermere - South Village 2.10 TZD 33.72 Varies per Phase g 91 (29%) 71 (Minimum 7,400) Metairie 1.91 TZD 29.3 12,580 4.4 acres (15%) 56 Brumlow East 1.61 TZD 32.8 jAl Minimum 6,600 `m 13.26 (40.41%) 53 . . . . ..... *Net Acreage for a specific neighborhood as part of an overall development. Issues Fidelis and Shivers tracts • Land Use designation is Mixed Use • Zoning is S-P-2 with 0-1, 0-2, HC, C-1, C-2, C-3, and CS uses; TZD; C-2; AG; and S-P-1 with 0-1 uses. • Planned extension of Kirkwood Boulevard runs through these tracts Recommendations/Pol icy • Retain the existing underlying Mixed Use land use designation and the Campus Office Overlay district. • Expand the plan area to include the properties at the northwest corner of S.H. 114 and North White Chapel Blvd. • Future development on these properties should be approved in a manner that is sensitive to potential impacts on adjacent residential areas, particularly as related to noise, traffic, building heights, lighting, and views. • Undeveloped properties should be developed in a cohesive manner with consideration for connectivity, design, and architectural style. • For areas immediately along and east of the planned Kirkwood Blvd. extension, low -impact development such as residential with a similar design and pattern to the existing neighborhoods across White Chapel may be considered as a transition to the neighboring single-family residential properties. • Multi -story, class "A" office development is encouraged. • Buffer any residential uses from non-residential uses on this property. • Traffic signals at major street intersections should be anticipated and addressed with development. • As development is proposed, traffic impacts on Dove Rd. and White Chapel Blvd. (including the roundabout) should be assessed. • Development should be sensitive to the existing tree cover and attempts should be made during the planning process to maximize tree cover along with natural features and topography. • Any development should be walkable and pedestrian -friendly. • Family history of Shivers tract should be preserved or recognized possibly through use of open space. • Encourage cross -connectivity and access onto the S.H. 114 frontage road. • Assess completion of Kirkwood Blvd. to its full width with development of adjacent properties. / • Property development along North White Chapel Blvd. should align driveways and intersections with anticipated or existing median breaks. ��\\�lllllll