The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7B - PresentationCITY VF SOUTHL,4 Item 7B Zoning Change and Development Plan for Trademark Southlake ZA25=0045 ,� ,, .... E �,.�..,_ ;' -', �iI11�1�`Si]■■■�1��\C■.its f ST TF fii fUL FAX GLENfV 40'''�a r: 1Zi�FRN 400 WkL 4 Low Denfity Residential Office Commercial Medium Densi Residential Mixed Use Future Land Use Medium Density' :6 • The Campus Office overlay category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the use of high -quality, medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses and their ancillary uses and structures. This district is inherently suited for the development of built - to -suit office developments 100,000 square feet or larger for the use of corporate or regional headquarters, professional services firms, financial firms, information technology and media companies, biomedical companies, and other users which drive demand for medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses. • Generally characterized by 2-4 story buildings that have a floor -to -area ratio (FAR) under 1, with highly integrated green space as a key feature of the design, parking structures or underground parking dispersed and/or separated from the main building, horizontally -integrated floor plans, more subdued low -impact building design, and the presence of multiple buildings or building wings if accomplished in an environmentally sensitive manner. Amenities such as walking trails, open space, plazas, water features, special roadway and sidewalk treatments, and unique landscaping should be incorporated into the development. 11 A Tr r r r Site Recommendation O114 Corridor and Wellness EMMedical Overlay Restaurant and Specialty Retail Overlay OCampus Office Overlay Multi -Tenant Office Overlay High -Rise Office Overlay Mixed Medical and Office Overlay Untinnal Land u-c%IP_ Catp-mry — Camnu_c% v The Employment Center 1 (EC-1) category is intended for the highest intensity of commercial and employment uses immediately adjacent to S.H. 114, while Employment Center 2 (EC-2) is intended for a medium intensity mix of uses that transition from EC-1 or S.H. 114 to EC-R or lower intensity residential neighborhoods. Scale and Context: ' ➢ 2 — 4 story buildings ➢ 4 — 6 story buildings ➢ Small scale retail uses shall be located at key intersections. ➢ Larger -format retail uses (with footprints larger than 40,000 s.f.) shall be located adjacent to the arterial or highway with ' pedestrian entrances from internal streets. Character and Design: Legend ➢ Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly. RC ➢ Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10'. EC-1 ➢ Sidewalks shall be 6' — 8' with a linear planting strip for street trees. EC-2 ➢ Parking to be limited to on -street parking and surface parking - to the rear of buildings. EC-R ➢ Parking garages are encouraged over surface parking lots. \ )( Issues Fidelis and Shivers tracts • Land Use designation is Mixed Use • Zoning is S-P-2 with 0-1, 0-2, HC, C-1, C-2, C-3, and CS uses; TZD; C-2; AG; and S-P-1 with 0-1 uses. • Planned extension of Kirkwood Boulevard runs through these tracts Recommendations/Policy • Retain the existing underlying Mixed Use land use designation and the Campus Office Overlay district. • Expand the plan area to include the properties at the northwest corner of S.H. 114 and North White Chapel Blvd. • Future development on these properties should be approved in a manner that is sensitive to potential impacts on adjacent residential areas, particularly as related to noise, traffic, building heights, lighting, and views. • Undeveloped properties should be developed in a cohesive manner with consideration for connectivity, design, and architectural style. • For areas immediately along and east of the planned Kirkwood Blvd. extension, low -impact development such as residential with a similar design and pattern to the existing neighborhoods across White Chapel may be considered as a transition to the neighboring single-family residential properties. • Multi -story, class "A" office development is encouraged. • Buffer any residential uses from non-residential uses on this property. • Traffic signals at major street intersections should be anticipated and addressed with development. • As development is proposed, traffic impacts on Dove Rd. and White Chapel Blvd. (including the roundabout) should be assessed. • Development should be sensitive to the existing tree cover and attempts should be made during the planning process to maximize tree cover along with natural features and topography. • Any development should be walkable and pedestrian -friendly. • Family history of Shivers tract should be preserved or recognized possibly through use of open space. • Encourage cross -connectivity and access onto the S.H. 114 frontage road. • Assess completion of Kirkwood Blvd. to its full width with development of adjacent properties. • Property development along North White Chapel Blvd. should align driveways and intersections with anticipated or existing median breaks. LI ------------------ Legend I AG cI :,. RE5 M C2 SFIA C4 SFIB - NRPUD + .• M SF2 HC SF30 B1 t, SF20A B2 SF20B I1 MP :.. RPUD _ I2 MFI SP1 MF2 SP2 DT cs i TZD f ' } ECZ 101 O d,1Y3 ,'�� 1825 R8� OI w er eti t 02 _ '100 , 1,i 7A. 1811 161z: �r 1914 • Purpose: The Employment Center Zoning District implements the goal for the S. H 114 corridor of the Southlake 2025 Plan — Phase II to create an employment center (EC) land use category that provides a tiered approach to development along the highway corridor. • Intent • Encourage mixed -use development (office, retail, hospitality, residential). • Promote corporate campuses and quality commercial design. • Protect natural features and integrate open space. • Create pedestrian- and bicycle -friendly environments. • District Components: • Commercial Core (EC-C): High -intensity retail, office, and mixed -use. • Edge (EC-E): Office, residential, limited retail. • Neighborhood (EC-N): Residential with transitions to existing neighborhoods. • Open Space: Parks, greens, plazas, preserves (min. 15% of site). x k �•� L Development Standards: Flexible guidelines for streets, blocks, building heights, parking, and d i and connectivity. Exemptions include: Screening & Fencing, Bufferyards, Overlay Zones y Subdivision Ordinance requirements. �;)C`� 1 a I 1 1 1 � i .■ ', tL' ti 1 III III C �" - � I `I `� r' 111 JIL J{L J � �•� J ! ' it'! pR, , x cif - -102 r p o I If "i Ih i 1 1 a� ■ ' � r rr J C-1 03 E KIRKWOOD BLVO M ��-- --- r-- - - - - - - - - II I Dverall Pronosed Develonment P12 Lot 1: To be defined in the future II N -- til ; III Ijl Ij i i I Lot 4: LJ�L J`L J•' I 1 1 C 102 Single 1 C-101 aa� r �EKIRK' Lot 2. Retail/ . ' Restaurant `,` III J loll I:I — I Ali l aw �. .n C103 I e� C-104 I Vol, III i ° Lot 3: I ` 7:,I Office/ Restaurant ` ` i jHfftfl -s �ICI R �a. _ I . i hfp�I I Dvprall Prene-r%pd ❑ Family Residential (-13,246 SF Lot Area) d Lot 5: Single Family Residential (-10,960 SF Lot Area) Existing Zoning AG —Agricultural Proposed Zoning ECZ — Employment Center District Land Use Designation Mixed Use Gross Acreage (AC) 40.21 acres Net Acreage (AC) 33.16 acres Commercial: 21.85 acres Percentage of Site Coverage 82% Area of Open Space (AC) 7.25 acres (ECZ Standard: Flexible) Open Space as a Percentage 18% o (ECZ Standard: 15/o Min.) Total Building Area 149,528 SF Area by Use Restaurant 55,687 SF Retail 18,551 SF Grocery 33,798 SF Office 41,492 SF Parking and Loading Spaces 986 (879 excluding Lot 1) Total Number of Residential Lots 37 Residential Density -ECZ has no density requirement - • " • " 0.92 Units/AC 1.11 Units/AC 2.41 Units/AC 2.65 Units/AC Bldg.1 TBD TBD nTBD Bldg. 2 1 Restaurant 2,861 SF Bldg. 3 1 Restaurant 3,914 SF Bldg. 4 1 Grocery 33,798 SF Bldg. 5 1 Retail 18,551 SF I—! ioz To-+f1� iI c-ioa c ioa { Lot 1 4 i Lot 2 /.'�♦ G0 1 3 N0 �5 jcN�,�NES 4 BLDG 3 Restaurant METAL 21NOPY OECORATIVECCCSENECK PAINTEOBRICK LIGHTING H-1 M C 11-1 \ 1 SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation HORIZONTAL PANELS- PgINTEO BRICK W000 FINISH COLOR TIRO HORIZONTAL PANELS - WOO❑ FINISH COLOR TBD 1 JLILil L L Side Parking (Northwest) Elevation PAINTED BRICK HORIZONTAL PANELS- W000 FINISH COLOR TBO II 1� Facing Bldg. 3 (Southeast) Elevation HORIZONTAL PANELS- W000 FINISH COLOR TM Interior Parking (Northeast) Elevation ^k�`aX^ 11\'1111 ® � 11►1111 7 IIIIIIIIIII �� Lot 2 — Building 3 Elevations �..1�:e. � i ��. .� I♦F �Y f �..� feel mpg ■mmnom RR. ��feq_ ':}• aw 's _ _a�� v :� ti. f�• fir— �- -- - - - - -.. — - - — J �� . �� •- ,-7-• dwell desivrn studio O Building 4 — Grocer Front Elevation (Southwest) .;, Scale: iN6"=1' 3-0OAT STUCCO FINISH- STANDING SEAM METAL PAIN�COLOR TBD, TYP ROOF 57'-0' Building 4 - (Grocer) Side Elevation (Northwest) 5 Em 3-COAT STUCCO FINISH - PAINT COLOR T3D, TYP Building 4 — Rear Elevation (Northeast) 31COAT STUCCO FINISH I IIRFORATEo METAL RTV PAINT COLOR THE, TYP SCREEN Building 5 — Rear Elevation (Northeast) ,E BIq, lilt K 1 1 �► 8' OMIM!ST ems__t to�Ipl �_��'.� � Roars&INIM luu IIIII� JIIn IIu �sllil 1u11 �u]1 1111� p ii ; ~� I � �I I�1lLliis 111 !!�! !! ��ii I�l�. 1 �E!�� f � • � � ! fig, _ Fiiff - '��'i - •rya: + �—. � ad�K _ iqn - No Text Bldg. 6 1 Restaurant 6,000 SF Bldg. 7 1 Restaurant 7,500 SF Bldg. 8 1 Restaurant 12,598 SF Bldg. 9 1 Restaurant 1,554 SF Bldg. 10 1 Restaurant 5,100 SF 2-3 Office 10,200 SF Bldg. 11 1 Restaurant 6,646 SF 2-3 Office 13,292 SF [Bldg, 12 1 - 3 Office 18,000 SF •��' C 101 ; l ` \ 1P\ 5�N o r s � � �- e Ir- �® 'rivate Park P 1 =i o _Jib - vRLvoseo scREF1r wu�. FlEFER TO LAN03CRPE PLNB ' �F FUR �EFAI I \ CI � b L] LI � 1 1 t Restaurant 9,514 SF '� 12B ts• 9' IN. M 1B' ID' BP 16 CpT 3, 9LOCKA 15 ~" � RS9 ACRE4 A _ I Fya.�CHISTING GONCIiT � ➢PoVEwA'/` ONSE.CDMMERCLy I 1 V 1M�EPCF[iI OF l C 1 F 20'YYI➢E RICIRAFmAY EheEMEHT. NE TRFCUNNIY EIECiHC WAPEFAIIVE, INC. vo�avm.vts au we .ururr AN. oaT-U-r. ➢RAH,LE EA_�EMEM p `III 177TP.. _ _ FI �_-1 1 FIREO::"t_ - P r Restaurants B' �EEPALUMINNM COPING CORNICE PROFILE RRICK(COLOR TRO) I VERTIi AL COLOR TPANIELp WOOD I I ALUOMNUMNINOOW3 I 19CREENATED METAL STU I DECULIGHTAT E0006ENECK FINIS i Building 6 & 7— Street A Elevation (Northwest) STONEVENEER Building 6 & 7— SH 114 Elevation (Southwest) Restaurant, i BLDG 7 BLDG 76 ISTONEVENEER I Building 7— Side Elevation (Northeast) STOREFRONT VERTICAL PANELS -WOOD PERFORATED METAL RTU DECORATIVE GOOSENECK ALUMINUM WINDOWS FINISH COLOR TRD S;R EEN LIGHTING 13GD' Building 6 & 7— Park Facing Elevation (Southeast) AN iiii iiii iiii m iiii NO■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ moon ■■■■ moon, n,■■■ moon, ' moon, ' I■■n, ' noon, ■nnm m11■ mnmm ■n■m mnn■ ■nnm mnnn ones minimal 1 iiIllusionI 11 iiii' iiii iiii Oii iiii == -==- a r� _____ =___ =__= ____ ■■■■ _==- -=== mono mono moil mono ■mom ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ n■■o ■■■■ moor mono noon mono ■Imo mm■■ norm nnnn onno mm■m Moon, 000o monsoons on,00 loom ■Iron o■m■ ns■■n n,■■n, ns■■■ monsoon, oleo ■ono moon, ooln, moon, ■■■■ moo■■ Lot 3 — Building 8 Elevations sell loss memo loom OPEN loll logo Boom loss MEMO long loss loll loon mono ::I:;::IN:I■Ni!RIMIii:IHHlei In! 1IM 1iH Lot 3 — Building 8 Elevations Restaurant METAL ROOF WITH WOOD PERFORATED METAL RTU SOFFIT SCREEN CANTILEVER OPEN WEB STEELJOIST METAL CLADDING STOREFRONT ALUMINUM WINDOWS BLDG 8 BLDG 9 SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation CANTILEVER OPEN RTU WE WOOD IINS:: Side Parking (Southeast) Elevation STOREFRONT ALUMINUM WINDOWS PERFORATED METAL RTU METAL CLADDING I ASTOREFRONT LUM NUM WINDOWS I I ME L ROOF WITH WOOD SCREEN Bldg. 8 Facing (Northeast) Elevation METAL ROOF WITH WOOD METAL CLADDING PERFORATED METAL RTU SOFFIT SCREEN Park Facing (Northwest) Elevation BLDG B O KBRONZE ALUM FASCIA BARN 01 O 17 A UN=REFRONT SYSTEM WITH A UINNUNI SPANDREL PANELS PAINTED CORRUGATED METALPANELTO SCREEN 'SAND VERTICAL GORE GLASS AND \42=1 C7A, SNE -COLORTBO SH 114 (Southwest) Elevation WODDTDNE C ENTITUOUS PANEL-COLORTB❑ DEGORATIVE SCONCE STOHE VENEER IJGHTING Restaurant Space 1 STEEL CATYOPY SUPPORTED BY PAINTER STEEL COLUMNSABOVE O OOR PATIO GLA.`S W WOHAILAT OUTDOOR PATIO ARCHNEGTU RAL STEEL CANOPY WITH TIE ROM - PAINT FINISH TBD BANK O' N-THROUGH CNJOPY AND OUTDOOR PA_ DRIVE THRU STEEL CANOPY SUPPORTED BY PAINTED STEEL_ COWNINS IN ■■ MI■ ■IM ■■ IN ■■ IN ■� ■■ �■ ■EN ■■ MI■ ■� ■■ M■ lim1111 ■mitli i1111 111 mitliM ■■ m■ ■w OEM _ A! m■ ■■■■ NONE ■■NEE■■■ NONE 111111111151 pli p loolle gpgp Lot 3 — Buildings 10, 11,, and 12 Elevations r -YNTM 1 0 MIMIM� NMI, I. ■..E m ■ ■� ■VA.. Imm. ■. ■■.■0111111111111111 ■. ME ME ■. FIN ME 11■ 11 ■! 1■ 11 ■1 ■■■ � Io.0mll son E■ 11 ■1 I■'1 ■1 No ME SIM No ME ■I■ ■■ .■!■. . ■■ ■�I=M. I ;. ■■ ■■■"■■■ ... "■■■ .■ II■ 11 ■1 1I 11 ■1 ■■■11111.11111111111111111111111. Elm ME ■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■ ___� =__ = =' ■■■■ 1111 !11!lI11 �111 11l1 Lot 3 — Buildings 10, 11,, and 12 Elevations No Text MON- p- a` A .. 1 r �. .r ' i1 1�9 ■ •Tj BAI :Ao e' Ilk � � .i yam. s �•.� ,r� �. � � �_ r ryL ^:: 00, 130 . �' • •' 2:• �y� 1. of -� > r. � •� S; -'1� �, ��-"�� _• •�a. 3 _ � -its 'i PT it, A VAJ QL P- S ii■■■,!d!s' i I oil in Vj �.sjm dwell deslqn Studio NORTH STAR 4,11 in —mow - logo-M __ - 4 1 gmw, I 1 lc RON 1 .9 I WO".. . L M—M IRE NO Ali 11 r■®��li� P 11 -111 IN, an ■am 0- - 111 Il! ■ 1■ ■ 1� �-�.- �� f � s'� ✓-, ■ 1 'F !R u 11,E I S ,.� { Ar��_ JLix I dwell _ design ��lll studio Lot 4 Lot 5 T � LI ll r j s L L Single Family Residential Number of Lots 12 25 37 Open Space Lots 3 3 (2 shown) 6 Open Space Area 0.42 AC 1.03 AC 1.45 AC Residential Density 2.41 Units/AC 2.65 Units/AC - Overall Residential Density 2.53 Units/AC Minimum Lot Area 12,056 SF 10,000 SF - Maximum Lot Area 0.363 AC 0.423 AC - Average Lot Area 13,246 SF 10,960 SF - 4 LOT 1 1A LOT 2 `AL LOT 3 a LOT 4 LOT 5 1 7-t'. .....D.�...5.. f� r�--- r---r ---r r- ...'.iceram... ""`IaI IaI I } laf Ial I I 4 1 4 $y�:-•, '_y � ,� IaI IaI I I I I to ..o,a.e.....a . �........ srR�Te .... $II....... . 83' x 145' �'- — --- I Fir I �_----_ FF-- -- Min. Lot Size: ::�11.1 Al �-12 035 SF �, $ ;IIaI 14III 11 , ,y 1 13T6 i LOT I LOTS III MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C-1�01 ------' !ram-�- !•r' � { �L.... J ICI ICI s. 11� C� 19 I�I 18 II1 17 _ 9 \1\ J1L —J ----JAL---JtL---J �' rf N�./� .....................:.srREET.C;.'.'.............. ....:.:.:.:.:.:::..._....... 20 21 I I22 III 23 I I 6 L---J L— —J L ---J L 7 24 2 1III III 26 f III 27 1 1 I I�f . �+C 9 1� ..... _ qy l; 10 I�f ICI ICI ICI ICI I �1a1 14' 1�i 4�11 15111 16 LYJLJLs—Z �--' XXXXXXY\A\\\\\ll ll I 80' x 125' Min. Lot Size: 10,000 SF I L/ :r No Text rip �S9 1 a>r G 7dQu� f :LV "aE AV- ■■: ■ram s , h s y. m MEMO !:� _■■■■ ■is �■ �� Q� sir■ �- ■MNI ERIN 5 ° a ' Mal r■�� _a old ' son ■■ ■■ a V( f f� Y -z �.a y��Ni ... ♦p/yyp AIF i'1 $ �R aa. ' y W 1. E IdRKVV(=BLVD ^— C . t C-101- ' r 11 -• i.C1 — w` II -103 1 I I 1 1 I1 -� i �.� `� C-104 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ■ ■ PROPOSED PUBLIC S' SIDEWALK - — — — — — — - PROPOSED PUBLIC 5' SIDEWALK PROPOSED PRIVATE SIDEWALK LIGHT ❑JTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PUBLIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT ■, \ ,- • - ................. •• \ �,y R\� 1 1 1 1 I� a \ , • e..l n ill_ — I I PROPERTYLIN€ _ _ 1 E KIRKWOOD BLA i `\X\\ s7 _ - , - - PROPERT'L`.E Tree Preservation Calculations Site Data AC SF Total Ste Area 40.21 1751512 Total Tree Lbvr Arm 1.39 80941.E Area of Reposed Tree Fresenetion 0.16 7184.7 Tree Cover Pro-rvati- RequiredM R—ded(SF) Ftaroentageofedsting tree cover on mtiresite 3.6% 6 W1.8 Mn, %of adstingtree cow to be preserved fig% 423M 7184.7 *(1 d Crdinmc 53;rE 72a, TsUe20) The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the pri man-made drainage v. maximizes the preserla1 and other streets as id n if designation; and vi. mitigation of altered tree pursuant to this Ordinance. of existing trees, if any, adjoi tjhg protected tr r I Du ritized in the S e Pposed tree replacement procedures _ I VAL AN. RFo i i llh� 11 7' a f- _• \. '�� J` _ _ - - - - PROPERTY LINE —CL otCL_CL-OL_oI--� P - E KIRKMOR OLVII y j I PROPERTY LINE Open Space Calculations Site Data AG SF Total 9teArea 40.21 1751512 Open Space Required (SF) PrcrAded(SF) 15% 19% 262727 324232 JI� rc � Jy'.iSi. •E 6� �� '.1 ! No Text EKIRKWOOD - �� oil ,�•� r +� f l � �I. I ��'. �:,.•'',.H..�� •' ++ 1 1. ICI i • d - � 1: � I �I C1TPfrirfTITTTRTl111111111 IF/ zI � , II II II II�I6fl 11 11 111 11 it l'. I . 'i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ` \ `� ``��: I STf7TiITTff.•. �-11III II II lul II II n I11111. .I _ I _ _ ,-� � i I 'H w 11 lei li LEGEND — — — — PROPERTY LINE 675.00 FFE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEVATION 675.00 BW PROPOSED BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXPOSED FACE OF RETAINING WALL PROPOSEDCONTOUR — — — — — EXISTING CONTOUR Existing Drainage Proposed Drainage J I I.1 I I Ii- - _ _ - _ Existing Sewer Line -..�a�N„�— -- - - -- -- -- - ___ _ __ Proposed Sewer Line J � �. � �u�~ {'•. 1{ 1 I { I 1 MY � I II I 1 y 1- 1- r rraixwrc.Ile- G Proposed 8-inc4ewer Une {P-O Proposed 6-inch Sewer Line - - ...p;' � p T€. I L ' E KIRKWOOD BLuo e o� _E I I _ 16 i Proposed 6-inch Sewer Line n�f yrI 1 1-- 1 I 1 1 1 1�1 I i A III p1 II _ xisting 8-inch Sewer Line �Ir U Sewer Lined- _ 1 I I 1= I ropoSed 8-i ch S wer me w . = `� .. ., .`�'`-11;'�►"'�."�—II I IaIInn II ImoIII- '� ❑ I � 2'i i � �..� `• -,, �i11LLLC Il 11 11 l l l l l l l f' _ __j 1� aristin 12-inch Water Line Existing Water Line 42-inclWaEer Line -- -- -- -- - - 'l-ne l- T_ I Proposed Water Line rr `Ij �ropolsed 8, inch V,later 4ine 1 1 I s t I I o "�` 1 ` '""' u�,�. a �, ` ; m 'p.�.g 1 ��^^ •��" i I -,. _ I �la,el��a L_ 11.d �=J •�---'�. go y r-'�/ -- i m.-eKIRlonroaosLw -- *;l\ Proposed 12-in ch Water Line Proposed 12-inch Water Line71 Proposed 8-1nch Water Line y h. \ J C .mom-/ `� I 1 �'i ff __� _ _ _ m it _-- !,I' Water Utility Plan �� Proposed8-inc�l Water Line I i i^` � 1 1 Permitted Uses: • Single Family Residential • Grocer • Restaurant • Retail • Hotel • Office • Medical Office Building • Medical • Drive -Through Single Family Residential: • Building Height: 2 Stories maximum (excluding basements) • Setbacks • Front:25' • Side:8' • Rear:30' • Block Dimensions: Less than 1,200 feet (unless limited by unique site conditions such as topography and vegetation) • Lot Area: Varies; Typical 1/4 acre, 0.229 ac min. • Lot Width and Depth: 80' Typ., Min. 69' wide on pie shaped lots, measured at Front setback; 125' deep • Maximum Lot Area: 0.43 ac • Maximum Lot Coverage: 40% • Maximum Impervious Cover: 60% Building Standards (All Other Uses): • Building Height: 18' minimum (including parapet); 65' maximum • Exceptions: Up to 90 feet maximum height shall be allowed for buildings meeting the following requirements: (a) entirely or partially within 1100 feet of the northern boundary of S.H. 114; and (b) no closer to E. Kirkwood Boulevard than 300 feet. Exception: 100 feet maximum for hotel use. • Setbacks: • Front: 50' along SH 114 • Side: Varies (See Development Plan) • Rear: Varies (See Development Plan) • All other uses (Measured from edge of Right -of -Way) • N. White Chapel Blvd: 10' minimum, but may be reduced with approval from Planning Director • E. Kirkwood Blvd: N/A • SH 114: 50' minimum Open Space Standards: • Required 15% minimum of the overall gross District acreage. • Dedicated park land, hardscape plazas, fountain areas, and amenitized detention pond, and other enhanced hardscape areas, will qualify as open space. Off -Street Parking Requirements: • Restaurant: One (1) space per 150 SF of GFA • Retail: One (1) space per 200 SF of GFA • Office: One (1) space per 300 SF of GFA Parking Space Dimension: • 9' x 18' minimum for head -in and angled parking. Although the ECZ District allows for flexibility, the district provides specific guidance for development. The following are applicable standards that are requested deviations from the ECZ guidelines: 1 Cul-de-sacs are prohibited in ECZ districts A dead-end street is proposed in the northern residential (Table 49-2) area. A drive through facility is requested for a regional bank that 2 Finance, insurance, and real estate establishments will serve as the anchor tenant for the office building permitted with no drive through facility (Table 49-1) The drive through canopy will also serve as a fully furnished outdoor patio on the 2nd level of the office building. 3 ECZ Commercial Core accessory buildings permitted Up to 3 kiosks are proposed in the park area. with an SUP (Table 49-1) ECZ permits a maximum building height in the EC-C 4 of 5 stories, or up to 6 stories if the dedicated open A maximum height of 90 feet for buildings closest to S.H. 114 space exceeds 15% and/or there is significant and 100 feet for a hotel use are proposed preservation of tree stands (Table 49-2) 5 Tree Preservation & Landscape Plans as presented The applicant is requesting variances for the following: • Driveway Ordinance No. 634 - stacking depth variance where a minimum 100' is required. ± 33' 1 ' / C-101 C-103 MmTg-M* T • • Building 1 not identified, formerly shown as a "hotel" — amenities and hotel type not provided. • Three kiosks are requested to be permitted but location has not been identified on development plan. • Max building height in feet for residential has not been identified (35 ft is typical). • Buildings 1 and 13 have not included all information needed for a Site Plan approval as part of the overall Development Plan. Future Site Plan approval will be required prior to obtaining a building permit. • Differentiate the private drive from the roundabout so it does not resemble a public street .- _ - . • . ifs ^i U. White Chapel Blvd-. Street.View - looking=West Im --_ _ _. •1 _'- _ "%sue'- �' �'�� r��,..,�F �+ F�`rr$4 `►,J� .. • • • t i I _ . r� r%Irr�ilr! ilrrrr illrl III � I f I fl C �\�t ��\ - f �N /r r111 i11r ilr �iiI IYY rf` IV �� ♦,, ��... �. i.- g., r dOBo- - - -� -,-- - 8 -109 -1q] - --�o I - lOB sa",ry 112 ':o WHEELER s24'Q 102 I� For: Opposed: • 7 3s aA 2009 is 12s 14 15 10 13 109 1as 10 1� z0s zoo Undecided: • 9a1 d ... 17 108 1976 i 09 y 19fi p L� J i 100 i xiR�FQF[ Ri - Outside300'-4 mSL03 - rase Responses In Favor i zm ° 100 1 108 112 116 121 124 Zoo 209 208 212 v^f� � in aaMaLN cc s yy 1833 NSA I L01 105 109�113 Ll7 121 125 201 205 209 213 20 1822 2 A 100 100 108:112 116 120 124 200 209 209 212 MUMNO PL 101 1 5 109 113 117 F21 125 201 2U5 209 21 217 � 1 1 tRD2_ ?f 17s1 1671 SrR iW 23 27 210 26 I90 25190 171➢ 395 204 90 29 4 514 512 510 Sim506 504 502 39 395395 28 �190 1I00 3660 z I L - I _ 200 190 1710 �qG i m I MO GL NN .- 1 1615 m�dSlAy � 0 CITY OF SOUTHLAK Applicant's Presentation