Item 7A - Staff ReportCITY OF 7A
SOUTHLAI<,,,E
19
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
September 29, 2025
CASE NO: ZA25-0035
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel
Boulevard
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Ashmun, LLC, on behalf of the owners Ashruf Khan and Munawar Begum, is
requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for 1965 and
1975 N. White Chapel Boulevard on property described as Lots 1 and 2, Block
A, Thrasher Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "R-PUD"
Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.
DETAILS: The property is approximately 2.89 acres and is located at 1965 and 1975 N.
White Chapel Boulevard, near the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Boulevard
and E. Kirkwood Boulevard. The subject property is currently two lots with "AG"
Agricultural District zoning. The requested zoning is "R-PUD" Residential
Planned Unit Development District. The applicant is requesting approval of a
Zoning Change and Development Plan for one of two options:
Option 1 has four lots that range from approximately 20,379 SF to 30,611 SF in
size.
Option 2 has three lots that range from approximately 30,000 SF to 40,000 SF in
size.
Both options include the construction of a cul-de-sac street with access to N.
White Chapel Boulevard.
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01 G, requires lots abutting property
zoned "SF-1" to be a minimum of 30,000 square feet in area. The applicant
originally proposed a development regulation in the R-PUD zoning requiring that
Lots 1 and 2, which abut SF-1A zoning to the north to have a minimum lot area
26,059 square feet and 25,192 square feet respectively. With Option 1 and
Option 2, this requirement is met.
Case No.
ZA25-0035
ACTION NEEDED
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
1) Consider 1st Reading of a Zoning Change and Development Plan
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated September 29, 2025
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-836
Plans
Presentation
Cyndi Cheng (817) 748-8269
Jennifer Crosby (817) 748-8195
Case No.
ZA25-0035
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Ashruf Khan and Munawar Begum
APPLICANT: Ashmun, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Thrasher Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY: - The plat showing for Thrasher Addition was approved in September
1986 (ZA86-041).
- February 6, 2025; A Zoning Change and Concept Plan was denied (4-
2) by Planning and Zoning Commission (ZA24-0050).
- February 18, 2025; 1st Reading; A Zoning Change and Concept Plan
was denied (6-0) by City Council for a 4-lot residential subdivision,
including the construction of a cul-de-sac street to provide access to N.
White Chapel Blvd. The requested zoning was "SF-20A" Single Family
Residential District (ZA24-0050).
SOUTHLAKE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The future land use designation for the site is "Mixed Use".
The purpose of the Mixed Use category is to provide an option for large
scale, master -planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses
such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The
range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying
proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated
development. New development must be compatible with and not
intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be
placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the
Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher -intensity office
buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential
uses. Nuisance -free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly
uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be
compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those
permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and
Office Commercial categories.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The property is accessed off of N. White Chapel Boulevard. This section
Case No. Attachment A
ZA25-0035 Page 1
of N. White Chapel Blvd. is designated as an "A4D" 4-lane divided arterial
with 88 feet of right of way.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan calls for a less than 8 ft. sidewalk along the
east side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. The applicant is showing a 5 ft.
sidewalk along N. White Chapel Boulevard. and along both sides of the
proposed cul-de-sac street.
UTILITIES: There is a 12" water line along N. White Chapel Boulevard and an 8"
sanitary sewer line in E. Kirkwood Boulevard. 8" water and sanitary sewer
lines will be extended through the proposed cul-de-sac to provide service
to the lots.
DRAINAGE: Lots 1, 2 & 4 drain toward the proposed street and into the N. White
Chapel Boulevard drainage system. Lot 3 drain toward E. Kirkwood
Boulevard drainage system. Drainage study shows no detention structure
is needed. This will be further evaluated with the constructions plans prior
to development.
TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585, as amended, requires a
minimum of 60% of the tree cover to be preserved. There is 21 % of
existing tree cover within the proposed development of the 60% that is
required to be preserved. A total of 54% of the existing tree cover is
proposed to be removed and 46% proposed to be preserved.
CITIZEN INPUT: This request has not been presented to the Corridor Planning Committee
or SPIN.
PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION: August 21, 2025; Denied (4-1, Gunter) Subject to Staff Report dated
August 15, 2025, and subject to Development Plan Review Summary
No. 3 dated August 15, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL: September 2, 2025; Tabled (7-0) to the October 7, 2025 City Council
meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated
September 29, 2025.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA25-0035 Page 2
Vicinity Map
1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Boulevard
= � QO
KIRKWOOD „
KIRKWOOD
R
1801 _ 201
N
0 0.01101 0.02 0.03 0.04
Miles
ZA25-0035
Case No.
ZA25-0035
".0y clue
i. „„_F„ co.mry cwe
c we.
Attachment B
Page 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA25-0035 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 09/29/25
Project Name: Zoning and Development Plan — 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Ashruf Khan Same as Applicant.
Ashmun LLC
P.O. Box 93502, Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-239-1243 Phone:
Email: aliarap786@gmail.com Email:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
09/11/25 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT CYNDI CHENG AT (817) 748-8127.
1. Provide a fencing and landscape plan/exhibit. Show the location, type, and height of all walls,
fences, and screening devices. Note whether existing or proposed.
2. Show, label and provide the area and percentage of the gross RPUD area landscape buffer &
open space easements.
3. Update the Development Regulations based on the new plans and include the Open Space
Easement Management Plan. Set the minimum lot area for lots abutting the low density platted
lot and the other lots.
4. Update all supporting plans and documents based on the new development plan.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Case No. ZA25-0035 Review No. Three Dated: Aw4ust 6, 2025 Number of Pages: 2
Project Name: Alishba Homes LLC — 1965 & 1975 N. White Chapel (ZDP)
Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713
The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on July 28, 2025 . Comments designated with a
number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or
City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to
contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA25-0035 Page 1
The proposed preservation of existing tree cover does not comply with the existing tree cover
preservation requirement of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 21% of existing
tree cover within the proposed development and a minimum of 60% is required to be preserved.
A total of 54% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 46% proposed to be
preserved.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on the
entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be preserved*
0% — 20%
70%
20.1 — 40%
60%
40.1 % - 60%
50%
60.1 % - 800//0
40%
80.1% - 100%
30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights -
of -way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
Case No.
ZA25-0035
Attachment C
Page 2
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
No comments.
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
Public Works/Engineering Review
Building Inspections Review
Demo permits are required for each house. Septic systems must be removed with the demo permit
and Tarrant County Health Dept must be notified.
Susan Hernandez
Deputy Building Official
Phone: (817) 748-8238
E-mail: shernandez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Fire Department Review
Case No. Attachment C
ZA25-0035 Page 3
Case No. ZA25-0035 Review No. 2 Dated: 08/13/2025 Number of Pages: 1
Project Name: 1965 N White Chapel Blvd
Contact: Lorenzo Chavez, Fire Marshal Phone: 817-748-8671 Fax: 817-748-8181
The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on 0810512025. Comments may be incorporated into the
formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. It is the applicant's
responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
INFORMATIONAL
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with
un-sprinklered homes and 600 feet for subdivisions that are completely sprinklered.
Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire access roads in residential subdivision must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb.
(Standard street width)
Fire apparatus access requires a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot
outside turn radius.
Cul-de-Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 50-foot radius (100-foot diameter) for
approved turnaround.
Lorenzo Chavez
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: Ichavez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No.
ZA25-0035
Attachment C
Page 4
General Informational Comments
No review of proposed signs is intended with this development plan. A separate building permit
is required prior to construction of any signs.
Building permit(s) are required prior to commencement of any work.
In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
A preliminary plat must be approved prior to submittal of a Final Plat/Plat Revision. A Final
Plat/Plat Revision must be approved prior to execution of a Developer's Agreement to construct
street and utilities. The plat must be approved and recorded in the county prior to lot conveyance
and issuance of a building permit.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA25-0035 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO #
Owner
Zoning
Physical Address
Acreage
Response
1
PAILES, NATHAN A
SF30
108 BRENTWOOD CIR
0.06
NR
2
ASCENCIO, CRISTOBAL
SF30
112 BRENTWOOD CIR
0.01
NR
3
SIMPSON, CHARLES
SF30
104 BRENTWOOD CIR
0.05
NR
4
XIONG, KEVIN
SF30
100 BRENTWOOD CIR
0.06
NR
5
SATHY, ASHOKE
ECZ
200 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.54
NR
6
SUAREZ, GERARDO
SF1-A
2005 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD
1.71
NR
7
METAIRIE SOUTHLAKE INVESTORS L
TZD
100 CLEARY CT
0.09
NR
8
JAMES, KEVIN
TZD
101 CLEARY CT
0.16
NR
9
HYMES, JOHN
ECZ
108 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.41
NR
10
ALMOG, JONATHAN
ECZ
204 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.00
NR
11
SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD
AG
1900 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD
1.34
NR
12
DAVENPORT, DANIEL F
ECZ
104 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.34
NR
13
LEE, CHARLES
ECZ
100 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.37
NR
14
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
ECZ
100 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD
0.62 NR
Case No.
ZA25-0035
Attachment D
Page 1
15
CARILLON CROWN LLC
ECZ
201 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD
0.19
NR
16
CARILLON CROWN LLC
ECZ
1801 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD
0.47
NR
17
TAVISALA, KALYANI
ECZ
208 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.36
NR
18
MCGOWEN, MILTON
ECZ
105 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.37
NR
19
CARILLON CROWN LLC
ECZ
1840 RIVIERA LN
2.33
NR
20
KEVIN HAVER ROSTRON LEGACY TRU
TZD
105 CLEARY CT
0.25
NR
21
HW BUILDERS LLC
TZD
109 CLEARY CT
0.26
NR
22
GOLLA, HEMANTHA
ECZ
101 ST. TROPEZ DR
0.35
NR
23
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
ECZ 400 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD
4.70
NR
24
SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL ISD
NR
1000
KHAN, ASHRUF ALI
AG
1975 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD
1.00
1001
KHAN, ASHRUF ALI
AG
1965 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD
1.68
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-one (21)
Responses received: Zero (0)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA25-0035 Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-836
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, THRASHER ADDITION, CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED
A 1965 AND 1975 N. WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARD, AND MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM
"AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED
CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED
HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use
of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes,
and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "R-PUD"
Residential Planned Unit District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 1
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect
of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and
off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to
control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air;
effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the
land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 2
existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air,
prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates
the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there
is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that
there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity
to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were
originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for
the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at
large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety
and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, and located at 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd., and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "R-
PUD" Residential Planned Unit District as depicted on the approved Concept
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 3
Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the
following conditions:
IN
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 4
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the
balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as
to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in
court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 5
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as
required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2025.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2025.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, and located at 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
Reserved for Metes and Bounds
Attachment E
Case No.
ZA25-0035
Page 8
I0,711:11-.11 M 1.1
Reserved for approved Development Plan
Case No. Attachment E
ZA25-0035 Page 9