Loading...
2012-04-23 Meeting Report (Water System Master Plan)SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. Ordinance No. 1032 PROJECT NAME: Water System Master Plan SPIN DISTRICT: Citywide MEETING DATE: April 23, 2012; 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Fourteen (14) SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: None CONSULTANTS PRESENT: Derek Cheatham & Nelson Lucius; Neel Schaffer, Cheatham & Associates STAFF PRESENT: Bob Price, Director of Public Works; Ken Baker, Director of Planning Development Services; Gordon Mayer, Deputy Director of Public Works and City Engineer; Steve Anderson, Civil Engineer; and, Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I, (817)748-8069; lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Details The Southlake 2030 Water, Waste Water & Storm Water Committee has finished its work on the water element of this plan and has made the recommendation that City Council consider approval of the three elements (1: water; 2: waste water and 3: storm water) separately. As such the water element has been completed and is ready for formal approval. Adopting the plan in FY 2012 provides staff and City Council the ability to use the plan as a guide for funding recommendations for FY 2013 and move forward next fiscal year on the development of the water conservation plan. The following is a summary of recommendations presented at SPIN: Pressure reducing valves Connection from Pearson Pump Station to Johnson Road T.W. King pump station upgrades Pearson Rd. pump station upgrades Tier II and Tier III projects QUESTIONS / CONCERNS Do the green lines just serve Southlake? No, through cooperation agreements, it is shared with Keller and WestlakeÎ ition on private wells? Support or resistance? Currently, private wells are allowed. Deep wells can be expensive. We have seenÎ the aquifer get depleted which has caused some issues. Ground water is not currently regulated for irrigation purposes. The County has registration requirements in place for drilling wells. No restrictions in Southlake at this time. Will Southlake consider promotions or tax incentives? Not currently water re-use may become a viable source for irrigation. Î If your pressure is low, what would that mean? Sometimes pressure is lowered by extended use of the elevated tanks; landÎ elevation changes can also cause pressure changes. We can test for low pressure problems. How is it that we went into water restrictions before Keller if we share the same line? Î such a short period of time. This caused the elevated tanks to empty faster. The When will that project be completed? We anticipate completion by February 2013. Î Southlake sits on Lake Grapevine; what significance does that have? None we do not have rights to Lake Grapevine. University & Highland ParkÎ W Yes, we have 90 days to comply with any water conservation Ft. Worth enacts. Î Is enforcement a part of this conservation plan? What we are hoping is that residents will modify their behavior. The intent is notÎ Smart Use. What about incentive plans? We have discussed a tier grade structure use more, pay more. Î Has the city considered balance between supply and growth? Yes, Î may not happen for 20 years. We do not anticipate a short-fall that warrants limiting development. The Land Use Plan dictates maximum residential and commercial. We have a good idea of what we will have at build-out. The Land Use Plan is completed first and dictates all other comprehensive plans. I remember talk a while ago about a large supply line at the city northern border.. is that still happening? Not that Im aware of possibly the one coming down Hwy 377. Westlake at oneÎ time discussed a plan. Its been a while.. about 20 years ago. Î SPINMeeting Reports are general observations of SPINMeetings byCity staffand SPINRepresentatives. The report is neither verbatim norofficial meeting minutes; rather itserves to inform elected andappointed officials, City staff, andthe publicofthe issuesandquestions raisedby residents and thegeneral responses made. Responses as summarized inthis reportshould notbetaken as guarantees bytheapplicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the casethrough the Planning andZoning Commission and finalaction by City Council.