2012-03-26 Meeting Report (Bicentennial Retail Plaza)SPIN MEEETING REPPORT
CASE NOO. Z12-015AA
PROJECCT NAME: Biccentennial RRetail Plaza
SPIN DISSTRICT: SIN # 7PP
MEETINGG DATE: Maarch 26, 2012; 6:00 PM
MEETINGG LOCATIOON: 140 Main Stret, Southlake, TX00ee
Traaining Roomms 3A – 3B
TOTALAATTENDANCE: Four () 44
SSPIN REPREESENTATIVVE PRESENTT: Vic Awtryy # 7
AAPPLICANT((S) PRESENNTING: Lis Swift, GS ArchitectsaaOO
SSTAFF PRESSENT: Richaard Schell, PPlanner II
STAFFCCONTACT: Richard Scell, PlanneII, (817)74-8602;rschell@ci.soutlake.tx.ushhr88hh
EXECUTTIVE SUMMAARY
Propertyy Situation
TThe property is located at 410 W. Southlake Blvdd.
pment DetailsDevelo
his propert was rezoned to S-P-1 Detailed ite Plan Ditrict in 200 (ZA05-14) forTTyySSss6666
thhe approximmately 12,5550 square ffoot existingg building. TThe applicaant is requeesting
approval of zoning change and ite plan to revise the xisting S--1 site pla andaasseePPnn
elevations to allow three covered paatios at the rrear of the bbuilding. Thee patios wouuld be
coonstructedoover existingg concrete aareas, so theere would bbe no increaase in imperrvious
cverage an no changs to the existing drainage. Only th westernmst covered patioooddeeeeoo
ould be costructed at this time. Approval of te other tw covered ptios would allowwwnnhhooaa
fleexibility for oother tenantss to add the covered paatios in the fuuture. No chhanges to paarking
or landscapig are propsed, howeer, potted lants may e added i the patio reas. nnoovvppbbnnaa
o other changes to the S-P-1 regultions or uss are propsed. NNaaeeoo
QUESTIOONS / CONCCERNS
ow much aea will the atios coveHHrrppr??
The covered patioo structureswill be approoximately 255’ x 40’ eachh. o
oes outdoo seating alrady exist? DDrree
Yes. o
SPIN Meeting Reports aaregeneral obbservations ofSPIN Meetinggs by City stafffand SPIN RRepresentativess. The
report isneeither verbatimm nor officialmeeting minutess; rather itservves to inform eelected and apppointed officials, City
staff, and thepublic oftheeissues andquestions raisedd byresidents andthe generaal responses mmade. Responsses as
summarizeed in thisrepoort should notbetaken as guarantees byy theapplicannt. Interested parties aresttrongly
encouraged to followthe casethrough tthePlanning anndZoning Commmission andfiinalactionby CCityCouncil.