Loading...
2006-03-21 SPDC Packeti ILY UX L7tPUtUJhCLJM" X cna.a SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD MEETING March 21, 2006 LOCATION: Town Hall Council Chambers 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas REgiULAR SESSION 4:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, consultation with attorney, Section 551.072, deliberation regarding real property, and/or Section .551,073, deliberation regarding prospective gift, Executive Session may be held for the Southlake Parks Development Corporation to seek advise from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Southlake Parks Development Corporation meeting. l . Section 551.072: Deliberation regarding real pro Oro a. Land acquisition for potential park land 3. Reconvene: Action necessary on item discussed in Executive Session. 4, PUBLIC FORUM 5. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS -- No items this agenda. CONSENT AGENDA.: All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Southlake Parks Development Corporation ,Board and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Board member or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 6. Consent: A. Approval of the minutes for the SPDC meeting held February 21, 2006. REGULAR AGENDA• 7. Consider: A. Recommendation for authorization for the purchase of a tractor from Saginaw implement Co., in the amount of $25,934 through the Buy Board cooperative purchasing contract B. Consider allocation of SPDC Project Reserve Funds in the amount of $37,825 for Nature Center improvements 8. Discussion: No items this agenda. SPDC Meeting Page 2 of 3 9. Adjournment. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the Official Bulletin Boards at Town Hall, 1400 Main Street, on Friday, March 17, 2006 at 5:00 p.m, pursuant to the Texas Govenunent Code, Chapter 551. 'tSWIPIFS1% ,�L - �( Lori A. Farwell, &4-Ne� City Secretary If you plan to attend this meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary's Office 48 hours in advance at (817) 748-8016, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 21, 2006 TO: SPDC Board of Directors FROM: Steve Polasek, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for Southlake Parks Development Corporation Meeting -- Tuesday, March 21, 2006 — e T'uesd March 21' at 4:00 .m preceding the regular please note the meeting time chang City Council meeting. zproceeding it . A end Item No. 4. PUBLIC FORUM : This is the public's opportunity � o ° � address that he Corporation about non -agenda items. During ) or take action on any item brought Corporation not deliberate (discuss among yourselves) 2) ask up at this time. The Corporation's options questions and respond to the presenter only, 3) urre questng stopicare ) listen, to staff tolookinto the issue and report back to the Corporation or 4) request that the Chair put the item on a future agenda for the Corporation to discuss or consider. 2. A enda Item No. 5. Administrative Comments: No items this agenda. 3. A enda Item No. 6A. Consent: Aural "1 L`t" "'""� -- lease let Deputy City Secretary 21, 2006. If you have corrections to the meeting minutes, p Tara Brooks know in advance or make it part of the motion her at nsideratio ation. S reached via e-mail at tbrooks calling Tara can be G�.southlake.tx.us or by g 4. A enaa item. ov, , —. tractor from Sa inaw hn lament Co. in the amount of ou received a bid price of $Y�,,934 the coo erative urchasin contract. —The City has implement Co. Because the proposed purchase ur hase purchase of a mowing tractor from Saginaw was not is through the Buy Board cooperative purchasinlg Deere 67 HFatractax wipthled bid front and rear required. The tractor proposed for purchase . The mowing tractor will be used. by Park hydraulic controls, turf tires and canopy. Maintenance crews for turf maintenance in conjunction Wrihthe he amount of $26,OOfleforlthe spreader, aerators and boom spray attachments. Funding purchase of a mowing tractor is approved in the FY 2005-06 S DC operating Budget. City Council will Consider this item immediately following t he SPDC 5. Age la Item No. 7B. Consider allocation ut OE u,_ 37 825 for Nature Center Im rovements - Over the eahavbeeri eral working months, lthes firm rm o representatives of the Bob Janes Nature Center for the Tucker property including the Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates on planningof construction plans for remodeling of the house for use as a nature u centin DecembeAs ZOOS the site review process an asbestos study was conducted on he SPDC Board of Directors Board Meeting — Tuesday, March 21, 2006 Page 2 repo as submitted by Aztec Environmental rServices ceiling tdicates exture,than asbestos The inspectionp in the vinyl flooring, is present within the structure primarily services (tapelb ed/texture). Staff requested a cost estimate from Aztec mAztec neludesl$36 000 foroa abatement of the asbestos containing material. The quote single removal project or up to $55,000 if performed separately and at different times- Current funding allocation to the Nature Center for facilityend s gnoa.� doconstruction nt in Current fa g $85,000 (SPDC - $70,000, Park Dedication - $15,000). project budget, current allocations are unable to absorb the expenditure for relation to thep 1 of the initial project scope. asbestos abatement and still maintain the integrity mmended Parks Board reviewed this item at their February 16, 2006 meeting of $37 825 with funding moving forward with the project in one phase at an estimates 6 balance). If recommended, being allocated from the SPDC project reserve fund ($6Ithe would consider as part of the mid -year budget review inSAp April ppstaf d will Council asbestos removal service would be bupcomingd ©llineeting. City an processes provide a review of this item at your 6. Other item included in your packet for your information: o Sales Tax Report e Capital Projects Status Report dated March 2006 youty, If have any questions regarding We appreciate your commitment anntact med service to the iat (817) 748-8018. the agenda or materials, please feel free to co SP STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION: Steve Polasek, Director of Community Services, (817) 748-8018 Chris Tribble, Deputy Director of Community Services (817) 748-8021 Sharen Jackson, Director of Finance, (817) 748 LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas Council Chambers in Town Hail Board Members Present: President Keith Shankland, Vice-e resit M 1 dse and Virginia o yn Morrisp M. Muzykat� Sherry Berman and Board Members Elaine Cox, Laura K. Hill, Mik , Board Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Assistant City Manager James C. Blagg, Assistant to the City Manager Ben Thatcher, Director of Community Services Steve Polasek, Deputy Director of Community Services Chris Tribble, Director of Finance Sharen Jackson, and Deputy City Secretary 1aBrooks. A enda Item No. 1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order by President Shankland at 5:00 p.m. A ends Item No. 2. Executive Session / A jenda Item No. 3 Reconvene. No executive session was necessary. A enda Item No. 4. Public Forum. No one spoke during the public forum.. Arxenda Item No. 5. Administrative Comments. Director Polasek introduced newly hired DeputyD beaker irector Tribble to the board. said he is excited to be working for the City ofS CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made to approve the minutes of January 17, 2006, as presented. Motion: Muzyka Second: Morris Ayes: Muzyka, Mills, Berman, Hill, Cox, Morris, Shankland Nays: None Approved: 7-0 REGULAR AGENDA Deputy Director Tribble Sims Stoffels Inc. to mcluae Mr, u—A-- im rovements at Bob ,Zones Park. Director Polasek introduced this item to the Board. 2006 Unofficial Southlake Parks Development Corpor� i n Meeting Minutes, February 21 Pageo 6 A•k Motion was made to recommend to City Council the amendment f the Loop Road Parking lot agreement with Dunkin, Sims, Stoffels, Inc., for the design and engineering improvements at Bob Jones Park for an amount not to exceed $5,f800o both to funded from the gn and survey, and a separate budget amendment not to exceed $60,000 or con unencumbered proceeds. Motion: Mills Second: Berman Ayes: Mills, Berman, Cox, Muzyka, Hill, Morris, Shankland Nays: None Approved: 7-0 A enda Item N©. 8, Discussion, Board Member Berman discussed the trails in Timarron along East Continental Boulevard. A gend AR Item No. 9. Ad'onrnment. With there being no other business to discuss, President Shankland adjourned the meeting at 5:13 p.m. Keith Shankland President ATTEST: Tara Brooks Deputy City Secretary Unofficial Southlake Parks Development Corporation Meeting Minutes, February 21, 2006 Page 2 of 2 U(A--.:>- City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 13, 2006 TO. Southlake Parks Development Corporation FROM: Steve Polasek, Director of Community Services of a Recommenimplement 'Co., dation for authorization for the purcase the Buy tractor from cooperative SUBJECT: in the amount of $25,934 through purchasing contract Requested: SPDC recommendation to City Council for out orization for the purchase of a of $2 934 through the Buy Action Saginaw Implement Co., in the amount tractor from Sag p Board cooperative purchasing contract. Background anon: The City has received a bid price of $25,g34orp�urchaseof a i through mowing thetractor Buy inform Implement Co. Because theproposed from Saginaw d. The Board cooperative purchasing contract a sealed bid ��process tractor aw'thtfrontzand rear tractor proposed for purchase is a Jahn Deere mowin tractor will be used by Park hydraulic controls, turf tires and canopy, T Maintenance crews for turf maintenance in attachment conjunction with the batwing mower, fertilizer spreader, aerators and boom sp Y Financial -06 SPDC Considera tion. Funding in the amount of $26,000 has been approved within the FY 2005 Operating Budget for the purchase of a tractor im act: Reduction in staff time for turf maintenance operations and equipment Financialp travel/transfer time. Citizen Input/ ollowing the SPDC Bcard Review: City Council will consider this item immediately fmeeting- 'Board Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Alternatives may include: ■ Recommend purchase • Decision not to recommend purchase Supporting Documents: Not applicable Staff Recommendation: tractor from Sag SPDC recommendation to City Council authorization $25,934 through the Buy Saginaw Implement Co., in the amount Board cooperative purchasing contract. °,-\ N - \ City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 12, 2006 TO: Southlake Parks Development Corporation FROM: Steve Polasek, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Consider allocation of SPDC Project Reserve Funds in the amount of $37,825 for Nature Center Improvements Action Requested: SPDC review and s�ntion to �of Council$37825the forallocation Naturef SPDC Center Project Reserve Funds in amount Improvements. Background Information: Over the last several months, City staff and representatives of the Bob Jones Nature Center have been working with the . firm of Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates on planning for the Tucker property including the construction plans for remodeling of the house for use as a nature center building. As part of the site review process an asbestos study was conducted on the house in December of 2005. The inspection report as submitted by Aztec Environmental Services indicates that asbestos is present within the structure primarily in the vinyl flooring, ceiling texture, and drywall (tape/bed/texture). Due to remodel and renovation plans, abatement and disposal of the asbestos containing material is the only permanent solution to controlling fiber release. Based on the results of the inspection report staff requested Aztec Environmental Services provide a cost estimate on removal of the asbestos containing material. The quote from Aztec includes a base cost for the area of primary remodel activity with alternates to include the remaining sections of the house. Done separately and at different times the removal costs are estimated at over $55,000. If addressed simultaneously as one project the projected cost is approximately $36,000 for removal plus State fees of $1,825. The current total funding allocated to the Nature Center for facility design and construction is $85,000 (SPDC - $70,000, Park Dedication - $15,000). Given the cost for abatement in relation to the project budget, current allocations are unable to absorb the expenditure for asbestos abatement and still maintain the integrity of the initial project scope. As such, additional funding estimated at $38,000 is required for the project to move forward. Parks Board at their February 16, 2006 meeting recommended moving forward with the project in one phase at an estimated cost of $37,825 with funding being allocated from the SPDC project reserve fund ($61,846 balance). If recommended, Council would consider as part of the mid -year "1(t)-1 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Nlarch 12, 2006 Page 2 budget review in April and if approved the asbestos removal service would be bid out following City and State processes. Financial The current SPDC project reserve balance is $61,84 . Considerations: Financial Financial impact may vary based on direction building. regarding impact: asbestos abatement at the proposed afore Citizen input) Parks Board at their February 16, 2006 meeting recommended (6-0-1) Board Review; moving forward with the project in one phase atSPDC tproae d reserve cost of $37,825 with funding being allocated from the fund ($61,846 balance). Legal Review: Not Applicable, i�ves: SPDC review and recommendation regarding the allocation of funds. Alternat Supporting Supporting documents include the following items:ntal Services Inspection report information from Aztec Environme Documents: ■ Cost estimate from Aztec Environmental Services Staff Recommendation: SPDC review and recommendation tocof $37 S25lforaNature n of SPDC Project Reserve Funds in the amount Center Improvements. r L� � .+���il r!tG_ �'y �.# , � �. �.: Table of Contents Section 000................................................ . .....inspection Report Section 4200........................... Sample Summary Matrix. Section 0300.....,-•••••••• -.Lead Based Paint Sample Summary Matrix Section 0400......................................... ...............Drawings Appendix A ....................................................... .Laboratory PLM Data Appendix B........................................ . ..Laboratory AAS Data Appendix C.................................... . ..................Photographs Appendix D................................... . ....Licenses & Certifications �� W Section 0100 n ----.4. inspection nT--vvi Inspection Report Asbestos -Containing Materials & Lead -Based Paint Tucker Park Southlake, Texas 1..0 E;recutive Summary Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, AZTEC Environmental Services, Inc. was retained by materials (ACM) and lead -based Inc., (BRA) to perform a survey of asbestos -containing t LBp on the residence located in Tucker Park buildingslakere excasluded,e and no survey Paint � ( ) in was limited to the interior of the main � made or implied. representation of ether parts of the camp �. Kevin a site visit on 12 December 2005, by The fieldwork was conducted during normal working hours. The Dalton of A�TEC1. The inspection was performed during Ms. Point of contact far the facility is Ms Suzanne C. � materials vveek Curren icy indplace�uand AZTEC Po includes only m Dove of the city of Southlake. This survey does not include inventory or building materials stared on site for repairs. 2.0 Background information ier-and s on a The construction of the residence is woad frame and braceick is cover dveneer lrvith composite beam foundation. The roof structure is wood -framed, The area surveyed measures approximately 3,000 texture and rywall�f inspection shingles. T ceilin t interior finishes consisted of sheet vinyl flooring, g guarantee Although every attempt was made to identify and sample suspect materials, no g in is made or imP Lied that all ACBM's and LBP's were located. amples were collected though such a manner as to accurately represent suspect materials. ateand other that prev inaccessible or unidentified materials may be exposed during unlikely, p materials, caulking, renovation or demolition of the facility. Roofing e advised of roofin materials were exempt from. the scope he fac p � ho should proposal' unless weatherproofing contractor performing work on previously otherwise specified. Anyunter any this, and of the need to stop work iofatelyworbe expanded to include PACM. Any unidentified materials, or should the scopeae considered PACM• materials not represented in this survey t mr. Dalton is a DSHS-licensed Asbestos Inspector (#600619). 1 of 5 0100 808. Aa5. 01 Tucker Park Southlake, TX 1 3.0 Insp'ection Scope and Procedures 3.1 Asbestos Inspection ing and ory The scope of the inspection included visual w as not�ntended to con, bulk mmply with AHERA analysis of suspect materials. This inspection 40 CFR Part 763 (E), the Asbestos -in Schools Rule. This inspection ldemol demolition Or comply with TAHPA regulations for inspection of l s facilitycollected by an Asbestos renovation under 25 TAC 295.34(c). All bulk same of State Health im Services. All aterialwere Inspector licensed by the Departmenty, and visually assessed as to theirh sisal physically touched to determine fria ' number of samples collected of each psuspect condition and potential for damage. Thematerial was decided by the AZTEC representative according to current regulatory requirements. rocedure involves physically touching suspect materials to determine The sampling p and general condition a£ the material. The Environmental l'roteation gency friability pulverized, Or (EPA) defines "friable" materialssure wherhiodry 'which can be crumbled, reduced to powder by hand pressure r�,enty_four (24) samples were collected and submitted to CAA Laboratories pliance w quid li es 023 5), for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLNl7, established by the USEPA (44 CFR Part 763.115). Due to federal reporting requirements for asbestos, samples consisting of mOre than one definable layer (i.e., floor tile and mastic Or drywall and joint compound) fcontor ain asbestos the amountOf the homogeneous areas sampled, Eight were found o of 71 %, 3.2 Lead Inspection The scope of the inspection included painteds surfaces Spectroscopy (AAS) was Samples of paint were collected. for bulk analysis by Atomic Absorption d in such a manner as to comply with field protocols and Testing p the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead- rnethodologies established s the HUD guidelines) published by the U.S. Department Bused Paint HcrzaYds in Housing o£ Housing and Urban Development in June 1995, rev. 1997, 24 CFR Part 3 5. define lead -based paint as containing ? l.0 �nglcm2 as Current HUD guidelines Of the areas tested, none were treasured by XRF, or > 0.5% by weight (5000 ppm)- identified as LBP. 2 of 5 0100 808.rt05.01 Tucker .Park Southlake, TX *'—k q5 — `1 4.0 Analytical. Results 4.1 Asbestos Materials found to contain appreciable amounts of asbestos The following homogeneous areas were y 1 %. Location Samples Material Color Taken Orange attern Kitchen and back en and Festioorn 3 3 Sheet Vinyl Flooring White Throu hout floor l 3 Ceiling Texture Red Laundry morn 3 Sheet Vinyl Flooring Gray Jack & Jill restroom 3 Sheet Vinyl Floorin White Game room floor 2 3 Ceiling Texture Drywall/Ta e/Bed/Texture Off White Back entry Office and hallway Dr-yw,all/Ta elBed/Texture White Yxn„ta Bedrooms 3 4.2 Non -asbestos Materials ere found to contain no appreciable amounts of The following homogeneous areas w asbestos. None 4.2 Lead -Based Paints The following components were identified as non lead -containing. Location Window sill Broom Wltiie Dvu .,, - Living room Wall Black Dating room Trim White Bach entry hall Wall Off White Garage Wall 5.0 options for Dealing with Asbestos -Containing Materials ith the exception of certain Current regulations require that all ACM wCategory l goofing and ials trust be removed prior flooring materials be removed prior to demolition. All dned mater to renovation activities that would possibly result in disturbance 5.1 Removal permanent "solutiort" to controlling Removal (abatement) and proper disposal of ACM is the only fiber release. While the waste generated will remain the property of the owner, the liability aintenance of the, associated with potential fber release, and the cost most expensiveassociatoption n short-ed with long-term -terra it may prove material are removed. While removal is often them 3 of 5 cker Park 0100 g pg.AO5.0 f Tu Souihlalce, TX �b'% to be, more economical in the long-term. when ACM is extremely friable and/or in very poor condition, removal is often the only appropriate response action_ 5.2 Repair Wbile tem orary means of controlling fiber releaseshort-term' t o. These en Repair is a very p ro Hate only in a very fe p� of ongoing O&M, it is appropriate good record when the ACM is in relatively good condition, and has low to moderate potential far damage- when response action -involving repair creates the need for periodic surveillance an g y keeping. S.3 Encapsulation " another temporary means of controlling fiber release when the ACMis in good chemical Encapsulation Is dition, Penetrating encapsulants penetrate the ACM and bond con and potential for damage is rela�enly law. The process involves applying protective encapsulating agent of one of two types he substrate, effectively locking down fibers. Bridgi h repair,encapsulation requiresperiodic ng en to t As coating over the ACM to protect it from damage,. surveillance and good record keeping. 5.4 Enclosure This II1VOlVE:B Another temp ary e to the material. n or means of controlling fiberain fibers, and to prevent damage damag difficult, Alff t, constructing a physical, airtight barrier to COc ood condition, and is very fcult, This is appropriate when the ACM is in relatively g bitivp expensive, or potentially dangerous toacce rern table response action ove. Enclosure requires periodic prohibitively surveillance and good record keeping making It an p 5.5 operations and Maintenance (O&M) ood O&M rogram is a valid means of controllingbeekn iden ified and ber release long-term. include Creation of an p O&M program is designed after all ACM u the facility has or near ACM; an special maintenance e or all of the following: periodic surveillance and re -inspection of ACM; training for some maintenance personnel and others a ton ofwill buildingaround occupants of the presen e and location of or cleaning requirements; notific or cleaning periodic air monitoring; and a schedule of planned response actions- ACM; options for healing with Lead -Based Paint 6,1 Working With LBP time the only lead regulations under which a single residence of1971 Section5(a)0), id be At this � regulations the OSHA general duty clause as set forth in the O to Tucker Park the OSHA Hazcom standard found under 29 CFR 1926.52awould0. happlY e OS14A reg lead - only lead in construction found in the event that in-house staff is to be used for construction involving containing components. 4 of 5 0100 808.05.01 Tucker Park �� Southlake, TX 7.0 EXpasuRre and Risk Assessments 7.1 Asbestos -Containing Materials 7 l,l Friable Materials All friable materials identified in the report are Regulated Asbestos -Containing Materials (RACM). Most of the friable maaiedrj cell cgs identified ghoul the re in the ore de of the drywall systems that nZalte up the walls nod enough condition to Generally, these materials were observed to in g e affected by renovation vation or demolition activities. remain in place until they will b All must materials that would be affected by a renOv ene alationco ordemolition activities'�n Any be removed prior to commencement of g d by a licensed Asbestos repair, cleaning, or removal of ACM must be performe Abatement Contractor, under the guidance of an Asbestos Consultant. 7.1.2Nnn-friable Materials The sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen, back entry and bath, laundry room and urndin in ace as g as shared bath are presently in good conditionrenovation nr tlemolitionlope ationn Y desired, but if they will be, affected by a licensed must be removed prior to commencement s guidance of an Asbestos Consultant. Asbestos Abaterrtent Contracto , 7.2 Lead -Based Paint 7.2.1 interior Surfaces The areas sampled contained no lead based paint in amounts exceeding 5000 ppm. 8.4 Statement of Confidentiality was prepared exclusively for the use off an tho ized represThe contents entative o l not be, disseminated, samehe This report F p without prior written in whole or in part, without the written co or conveyed to any other party findings consent of AZTEC Environmental services, Inc. Kevin T. Dalton DSHS# 60-0618 5of5 0100 808.A05.01 Tucker Park ry Southlake, TX 1 '-, Section 0200 Asbestos Sample �'umn d'y _ AZTEC Environrnental 817.244.9393 1813 E. Lancaster Avenue fax 817.244.9188 Fort Worth, Texas 76103 www.aztecenvironment al.coln Asbestos Bulk Samples Tucker Park Southlake, Texas AZTEC Project No.. 808.A05.01 F able Color Kitchen and back en and restroorn gam le # Descri tiora Oran a attern Thrau out floor 1 808-01-03 Sheet Alin l Flooring X White Laun room $08-04-06 Ceilin Texture Red lack & lilt restroon2 808-07-09 Sheet Alin 1 Floarin Gra Game room floor 2 808-10-12 Sheet Alin 1 Floorm X White Back en 808-13-15 Ceiling Texture X off White pace and hallwa 808-16-18 D ali/Ta eBedl.... e X White Bedrooms 808-19-21 D lil Ta eBedlTexture X White 0200 Tucker Park Southlake, TX YES YES YES YES YES YES YES I YE5 1 of 1 .nc of Section 0300 Lead Based Paint Sample Surnim y r,kC>-\-�) TES nvironment al `: 917.2 t�€.9393 1813 E. Lancaster Avenue fax 817.244,9199 Fort W orth, Tiexas 76103 www.aztecenvironmentat.eom Sam, le# - Descri tion SOS-LO1 Window sill 808-LO2 Wall 808_ L04 sow Los a' Lead Samples Tucker Park Southlake, Texas AZTEC Project No.: 808•A05.01 Color Location No Bedroom No Brown Livin room No ite 21�ack� Dinin room No Back en hall No -.. ,I of 1 0300 808..A05.01 Fucker Park Southlake, TX Sect*10 n 0400 lir dw LuLr=a m 1: .LTEC Environmental ` 1813 E, laacaster Avenue 817.,2 4.9393 Fnrt W orth jexas 76103 fax 81144.9I88 www .arteeeisvironmental.corn . 11 i .- 0 1 { Blue numbers indicate samples consisting of <1% asbestos Red numbers indicate samples consisting o ember 2 e tos AZTEC-808.A0.501 12 --\<b , 1 LP --------------------- Floor I I I Floor 2 I i ' I I I I I I I I i I I I F: , S ! Liter Environmental al Blue numbers indicate sat�ples eansisting of <5000 ppm lead r stt.2a4.93s3 Red numbers indicate samples consisting of 15000 ppm lead 1913 E. Lancaster Avenue fax 917.244 9198 12 December 2005 Fart Worth, Texas 76103 A �TEC-808.A0.501 www.aztccenvironmental.com 10 1 :� Esr° Lajq=AEMR,AvTNuI- 08 Febnmry, 2006 SGhnckel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Ate.: Mr. Ron Horton 1161 Corporate Drive 'West, Suite 200 Arlington, Texas 76006 Cc: Ms. Julie Dove, City of Southlake TX 761 b8,,21 i 2- Dear Mr. Horton-- Atprepared the request of SRA and the City of SOuss-Gonta� g materials from theTEC Environmental , has cost estimates for the removal of asba to structure on the Tucker Park property in southlake, Texas. 'These estimates were prepared with the assistance of National Abatement Services, Inc., a licensed asbestos contractor, and are believed to be -very caject Errvirosign, air r�rnental. Naturally, any g, and project management would be performedb y Q,ZTEC formal bid to perform the work described would ea.ssume thatpursuant oa site electr'city sar►d water it by tbe contractor to verify site conditions. Al prices quoted will be available at the site for use by the contractor, and that there ere will be, no other rn building trades on the project site, giving us full access to the e Estimates were prepared using current pricing and are reflective of current market conditions. Pricing for individual items may not be accurate if the work is to be performed several months or years in the future. Several line item costs were prepared, and are definitely ettfanhe yas a strbject tasi�imminent �novat on. e base bid is for removal of the area we discussed that is items, and they would er Alternates 1-4 are priced as separate line mobilization foreach.tAlternate 5 rebe sent the formed as separate projects requiring a separate cost for full abatement of the building, assuming that the work was performed as a single project with no interruptions or re -mobilizations. id orf nir asingle project, but there are be cost savings realized if any of the alternates 1-4 were added to too many variables to compute 3.11 of the possible combinations. If you require specific pricing for the base bid and one or more alternates 1-4, we can prepare that for you once we are given the scope. Drawings are attached to clarify the area affectedhave any questions regarding the information presented, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincerely dYeith Dalton President -\V-,6 Item � Scope of 9YPsum walls, ceilings, and I Base Bid Removal vinyl flooring in the SW Portion of sheet Alternate 1 the house Removal of gypsum walls and ceilings in hallway, including kitchen and attached Alternatc ut'tii area Alternate 1 +removal of sheet vinyl fluorin in same areas and ceilings in Alternate vgYP sum wails Alternate 4 anvil room Removal of gypsum walls and ceilings in ara e and 2n6floor identified ACM Alternate 5 Removal of all savings realized by p erforn�ing Savings projected Alter�nateJ, 5 over each oAtion se aratel Air Monitoring & Total Cost Project Abatement project I]esigu &Disposal 1lZana ement 22,020 1,500 14,020 5,500 1950, 8,330 1,544 4,880 1,950 9,398 1,500 5,948 1,344 6,684 1,544 3,880 1,950 9,320 1,544 5,874 35,328 1.,500 24,578 9,750 ig,920 Base Bid: I of all gypsum wall, and sheet vinyl flooring in tian of house Alternate A of all gypsum walls and in kitchen and hallway FLOOR Alternate 2: f of all gypsum wails and in kitchen and hallway, ,oval of sheet vinyl in same area fib. -")..a-- Alte rn ate 3 ! of all gypsum walls and in family room Alternate 4: of all gypsum walls and garage and 2"d Boor above garage) UN04;nt ,T-A pt) - L� Alternate 5: of all gypsum walls and n kitchen and hallway, oval of sheet vinyl n same area caw4,t ,0� ,--�(b-CIS DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE PARKS 1)2% SALES TAX REPORTCORPORATION 2005-06 Collected Budget Balance Pelt Budget to at?- Balance L :i.4_ 05�532 1 3$ 68.201 2 037 331 MQL7,331 59.82°/a FISCAL FISCAL %Inc FISCAL YEAR % Inc YEAR % Inc YEAR 04.05 -Dec g5.06 -Dec MONTH 03-04 $196,025 -Dec 9.2% $203,269 3.7% $459,781 256,504 126.2%9 10.8% October November 207,624 13.5°/a 35 ,293 354,293 11.5% 0 20.0 /° 405,410 14.4% ° December 295,221 -1.4°/a 14.8% 214,607 7.4% 246,505 14.9 /° a January 199,814 156,632 -0.7% 202,142 29.1 /° ° 24.3 /° - -100.0% 'February 253,443 1_9% 314,982 ° 9.0 /a -100.0°/a March 222,233 8.6°/a 242,241 16.9°/a "100.D% April 2.6,482 -7.6% 241,379 ° 17.7 /o -100.0% May June 262,967 18.6% -0.8% 309,404 221,883 10.3% -100.0% July 201,17 200,172 4.4%° 255,788 ° 27.8 /o 16.2% -100,0% -100.D°/a August 5epfember 269,852 �� �--- 4.8% 301,937 _-_________-_ $3�093,328 $1, 368,201 TOTAL $2,661,692 Three Year Revenue Comparison 1--. Rm^n+h $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 Q" pooh �HFISCAL A� o A ° o YEAR 03-04 0 FISCAL YEAR 04-05 m FISCAL YEAR 05-06 Actual Budget Actual Estimated 20� 05_06 (budget-est.) r__ ence Diife_ % Change 2D,�,_,04-D5 2005-�6 200-06 _ $ 203,269 $ 219,531 $ 459,781 $ 459,781 256,504 $ $ 240,251 6,589 118,19% 2.85%1 October November $ 231,403 $ 249,916 $ $ 405,41 405,400 $ 405,410 $ 22,774 6.43% December $ 354,293 $ $ 382,637 231,775 $ $ 246,505 $ 14,730 6.86% 0,00% January $ $ 214,607 202,142 $ 218,313 $ - $ $ 218,313 340,181 341,181 $ $ - - 0,00% February March $ 314,982 $ 340,181 $ $ $ $ - 0,00% April $ 242,241 $ 261,620 $ $ 261,620 277,586 $ - 0.00% May $ 241,379 $ 277,586 $ $ 355,814 $ - 0.00% June $ 309,404 $ $ 355,814 255,166 $ - $ $ - 0.00% 0.00% July $ $ 25 ,788 255,788 $ 294,156 $ - $ $ 294,156 318,839 $ $ ' 0.00°/ August September 301,937 ._---- $ 318,839 $ $ _ ,_,,,�.,,.�.._ 1,368,2D1 $ 3,689,875.12 $ 284,343 134.331/ TOTAL$ $ 3,093,328 $ 3, 405,532 SOUTlCLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Capital Projects Status Report March 2006 Liberty Garden; Phase IA Status: Construction on Phase 0 for tine Labynntn ana spray pau is (;arnPIULU. Minor touch ups ongoing in anticipation of grand opening scheduled for May 6th. Girls Softball;Cotmplex FX- 2004 2005 r Status: Temporary parking has been adaea k,5u-,5o spaces) in anuupdtivii Ut additional parking approved in the SPDC CIP for fiscal year 2005-06. Construction of a playground for Southlake Girls softball has begun and should be completed in April Dog Park Status: Dog Park grand opening wlli be punned Tor a TUEure Ua«. DUU DUU s Buddies had a fundraising event at the dog park October 29 and raised about $8,500 to help finish the construction. Fence installation is complete, with additions to the small dog side to be completed when the Fire Marshall lifts the Burn Ban . Concrete sidewalks and entries, as well as pads for picnic tables and benches have been poured. Signage and landscaping will follow irrigation installation in the next few weeks. Nature.'Center: Improvet1enis Status: Site concept plans and house renovation plans by ourk;Kei, MU1111 ]b di is Associates are ongoing and almost completed, with construction documents and estimates to follow. Alterations to entry on E. Bob Jones Road to improve appearance to front gate and help secure property are being undertaken by Parks maintenance staff. Corps of Engineer W.A.Ini t Grove Parrk Status: Work day for the Instaiiation or new signage can MU Uyue5Uran uaua was completed February 4th. Volunteers installed new directional trail signs as well as mile -marker posts for help in locating persons during an emergency constructed Staff assisted by digging post holes and clearing areas where signs were installed. Page k