1977-10-04 Regular CC Meeting
A G E N D A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
667 N. Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Ocother 4, 1977
I. Resolution No. 77-34 ( Appointment of City Secretary)
II. Community Development Affairs, Resolution No 77-35
III.Gun Control.
IV. Emergency meeting on Sewer Discussion
V. Bills to be paid
VI. Personnel Discussion ( Closed Meeting )
I hereby certify that the above Agenda was posted on the
front door and bulletin board of City Hall, 667 N. Carroll
Avenue, Southlake, Texas, Friday, September 30, 1977 at 4:30 p.m.
Item No # IV was added to Agenda October 3, 1977.
C ty Secretary
J O n p o -3 1-3 CIAX OF SOUTHLAKE
x e
v d ,IJ MINUTES OF: Regular Council Meeting
0 DATE OF ;KEETING: rJ OCTOBER 4,101
z TIME OF jKEETING : 7:30 P. m.
z PLACE-Op MEETING:, Council Chamber, City Hal
NAME '667,N. Carroll Avenue
OF
MEMBER 3 of 3 Index No.
•
Caption
area near 'the eastern city,limits and-Carroll
School would be able to qualify 'under the
guidelines"of''the E:P.,A. •finanding.. While
the -original sewer, plan was .,to, serve' 125
homes., the system now. based on.E,.P.A. density
requirements can only'serve 40 homes plus
the School, only one-third•!`'.of the orignal
plan: Mr. Lemmon reminded .the Council';
that this only meets the first;requirment..
a They would still have to go back and measure
on Cost Effectiveness., Mr:._ Lemmon,-stayed
that while these areas would :qualify undder
density. ,requirements, the whole'•.ptograjn has
to be Cost Effective. Mr.,'.Lemmons showed
on the map the areas; which would be se~'ved
consisting of Collector Lines running
along Oak Knoll; Greenbourgh,. Rolling Lane,
Raintree'and Carroll, School'with,Conne;ctor
lines in the Oak Knoll area. Mayor Hawk
asked why the. neccesity of : a' density study,
the purpose of the study,, Oft} what thils was o
achieve? Mr: Lemmon'explaihed to the gouncil
that there are many instances where small
communtie's.such as, Southl'ake -cthoughtithat
they could not.refuse the assistance of a
75-25 split on building ,collector lines and
a disposal plant Andthen found they could
not afford it. 'He also stated the E.P.A.•
is trying to see that the money is best spen
to solve problems. Just because a city has
septic tanks does not necesarily mean theyh ve
problems.
After lengthy discussion the question was as ed
as to what the original cost.,of,the sewer
system was? Mr. L,emirions answered: the total
GOODE X construction cost $819:,000'of which the City
SPARGER x x share was $205,000, the cost' of the above
SWEET X X mentioned.lines is now appro'ximatley $594,00
'POPKINS of which the City share is $148,000:
URBANOSK h x. It was moved that,further,effor-}Qn the syste
be halted until Mr. Anderlitch would come
to a future meeting and discuss in more
detail about the sale of bonds.
1~I~4YOR
ITY SECRETARY