Item 7C & 7D - Presentationary vF
SOUTHL,4
Land Use Plan Amendment, Zoning Change, &
Development Plan —1835 Shady Oaks
OWNER: Rama Gullapalli, Shady 21, LLC
�,.j APPLICANT: The Huffman Group, LLC and Sage Group
REQUEST: Item 7C: Land Use Plan amendment for 1835 Shady Oaks. Current Future
Land Use: Office/Commercial. Proposed Future Land Use: Low and Medium
1
Density Residential W//
Item 7D: Zoning Change and Development Plan for 1835 Shady Oaks. Existing
Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: "R-PUD"
LOCATION: 1835 Shady Oaks
CITY OF
:. , .. SOUTH LAKE
r a
IL t
Ar
e"i fit
if
u M P #{s 1F p1 Xx
14,
� *
w- \fi }�, Y ' A i3� '� ',; ]u� ca• .,, a„1 _ V 4AY'•Wt �!a a
..d' ,{CC �'(y, a Ny 'ITT y'•Q[A
ri�r; I � �",.81q r .� � F .a'� e� t � 'Ra°p,�� �%�r,� 'ar$4�r g7`+ \ ,��4��iy,• _
�. ,. Q _ %ice +� t, ` j�} -• • �,•IH' � l+�M �._ � � � �,f �Y ,ro *, Dy � � ,r� W��� �. "�� �• F A',: f,"'ti E �� -� .. S \ .`
'±� �• " '�;. ��p y� �yl w F".: v7' f'� � . j A J �''�R� � i, Y�t�.SR, •3V. 1[
G ems i.,M• F r
-..•�l,a .:Da a}�'�"�.: _r. R Y.Aw. _ rMld ai-: �..
Future Land Use
Land Use Designation:
Office Commercial
Future Land Use Update
'
100-Year Flood Plain
Corps of Engineers Property
Public Park/Open Space
Public/Semi-Public
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Office Commercial
Retail Commercial
Mixed Use
Town Center
Regional Retail
—
Industrial
0 200 400
FOt
�t
FOXGLENN
Medium Density Resldental
Y
44
J
N
Q
O
I
r
RAVENAUX
Optional Land Use Category
Zoning
Existing Zoning:
"AG" Agricultural District
's -
AG C1
...
® RE C2
SF1A C3
M
...are:. ..
SF1B C4
® SF2 - NR-PUD
CIO
SF30 HC
0 SF20A B1
0 SF20B B2
-R-PUD 11
- MF1 12
- MF2 0 SP1
MH - SP2
CS - DT
01 ® TCD
0 C2 ECZ
f I
w
FCxGLETAN
f
�
I
I
M
3 _
,eMedium -
= w'" Density
sNN� Residential
w � '
i
Office Co
�• l� � Commercial
" Low . Density J ! • yN�,r �v- z
9
1 I Residential
Existing Land Use
Office Con'
•�' .�ss portion to Medium -
eg DensitY Residentidl
Denier: u.
. mod.
Engineer: Developer:
o-W.— mssnmmas+re�� � Change omrnel'ciar �'" /R
sra+ae._sxue: �ware,,�,2sov -
� partiontd�9
R idential
Planner: ,( Soft, G.k P, 1NG / _._.... — — Ka SWICLAGVRP- -
r7 µ.R 25 r-. ioa mnr,xtwa (Proposed Land Use Zoning Case ZA25-OW5
®� -Land Use Amendment 1835 N. Shady Oaks Dr.
West, lames 1 Survey Abstract 1620 Tract 1A01B - Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
Residential Site Data Summa
Chart
EtisJrS
Eaivrg
nimean
�
apw xa LvstY
ME/e�
2mi l
Wd llse
imirg
rinWOW
�y
paAkallen �+'p'^k
(s
ly
pq�p
H
n.a9e
[16Lx ]J61
]65Eq
LOCATION MAP
— J Legend
S9% W
l /
1p.]pY 2L31x r /
---
i
.�V,
.•s it
'� n `u � H,i7 _- J 21 V�2... it i y.1-"��••� � -__
�p4'N.
Owner:
Engineer:--
o.em�
sao+mr.>� Mu9z s�m�. re,m nmz ®" i /
—1: fie, rmu,ea, r.e. t;E��: wn, u
Planner: sa�a lncrum�.r� r �
19 M40. 25 •.190' Zoning Case ZA25-0005
°° Development plan 1835 N. Shady Oaks Dr.
amen J 5urvey a r - SoutNake, Tarrant Couexas
Residential Site Data Summ Chart
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Number of
Average
ROAN
Net Density
Net Acreage
Open Space
Open
Gross
Zoning
Land Use
Zoning
Residential
Res
Dedication
(Dweiiingunits
�o�}
f
pace °lo
acreage
Lots
Lot Size
,owe
per
(S,f,)
gross aorBage)
AG
Agricultural
RPUD
29
231398
0.61 ac
1.367
20.60 ac
2.14ac
10.10 6
21.21 ac
Tree Canopy Cmemge
F 19005hady Oaks Dr Q
61
cm
NV
At
PPr 9 �
•
►mac' ) r� ,,,, _ ��L }
s•.
a �. ��
1835 Shady Oaks Dr Q x
low
�
t
Mi
OF, P.-I,
M
cam..
gm
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Land Use Amendment:
April 3, 2025, APPROVED (7-0) subject to Staff Report dated March 28, 2025.
Zoning Change and Development Plan:
April 3, 2025, APPROVED (6-1) subject to Staff Report dated March 28, 2025, and Development Plan Review
Summary No. 2, dated March 28, 2025, noting:
• the conditions that the approval not negatively affect the tract to the west with regards to setbacks, slopes,
and related zoning issues and
• noting the applicant's willingness to make the setback off of Shady Oaks 50' instead of 40' and
• noting the applicant's willingness to investigate utilizing the entrance off 114 as a construction entrance
and
• also noting that the Planning and Zoning Commission does not prefer to have the gate open to resident
access on 114,
• noting the applicant's willingness to provide more detail on the landscape plan tree details, especially
along 114, and
• also noting Planning and Zoning's preference for a consistent fence solution along S.H. 114 that Would be
maintained by the HOA as well as investigating vegetation and trees along 114 as opposed and
barrier wall, but further investigating solutions for sound mitigation beyond
CITY VF
SOUTHL,4
Questions?