SPIN2024-15 - 1963 W. Southlake Blvd.USOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2024-15
City Case Number: ZA24-0059
Project Name: Carroll Crossing
SPIN Neighborhood: 10
Meeting Date: October 22, 2024
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 10
Hosts: Bora Sulollari
Applicant Presenting: Curtis Young
City Staff Present: Madeline Prater, Business Manager
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation: 1963 W. Southlake Blvd.
Development Details:
• Future Land Use — Retail Commercial and Medium Density Residential
• Approx 15.12 acres
• Concept Plan
o Residential — 30 lots
o Office — 32,700 SF
o Restaurant (Drive-Thru) — 3,375 SF
Presentation:
Carroll Crossing
Southlake, TX
SAGE GROUP, INC.
6310 Lemmon Avenue
) Master Planning
urban Design
Suite 202
0 Architecture
I Landscape Architecture
0
Dallas, Texas 75209
"30 N. Carroll Ave., Ste 200
SDUWakeTEL SgT a 4.26�92
Carroll Crossing
Concept Plan
Residential — 30 lots
Office — 32,700 s.f.
Restaurant — 3,375 s.f.
(Drive Thru)
Carroll Crossing
Office
Elevations
P
.�wae_ , r�rrirri�
Carroll Crossing
Office
Elevations
Carroll Crossing
Home
L
L
Elevations
r
Carroll Crossing
Home
Elevations
MM
x
5
ate,,.
MOM
Carroll Crossing
Comments, Questions, and Concerns:
Comment: I'm glad you mentioned the size of the houses, because we thought they
would be smaller.
Question: So, you will have some green space with this development?
Answer: Yes, absolutely.
Concern: Off Peytonville in the morning with school, the traffic is so bad. It looks like
the traffic will not back up onto Peytonville.
Answer: No, it will not. There is a lot of stacking depth.
Question: The fences that are currently up are owned by the residents. Will the
proposed space go right up against those fences? Or will there be space between the
fences?
Answer: Generally, we do not want to put two fences against each other. We are
proposing to leave the existing fence and have upkeep on our side of it. We're open to
speaking with the residents.
Comment: There is natural drainage through that area of Southlake Woods.
Answer: Our retention pond would detain the runoff until it can be let loose. Our duty is
not to increase the flow as it is now.
Comment: I would also like to compliment you on having the greenspace area adjacent
to our homes. That's very good.
Comment: The lots themselves — you have 30 homes on approx. 10 acres?
Answer: 12 acres.
Question: What will these lots be? 1 /3 of an acre?
Answer: They range from 7,000 SF to 10,000-12,000 SF.
Question: When Hawkwood was going through the development process, they also
requested a gated entrance that City Council denied. Is that a make -or -break issue for
you?
Answer: No. It's something we think can bring value and quality to the development. If
Council does not want it, then we would proceed without it.
Comment: The city thought they were doing some improvements to Peytonville and
now it is a bumpy mess. I assume this will get worse once construction vehicles are on
the road.
Question: I didn't realize the lots were so small — is it a make -or -break that you have 30
homes?
Answer: The property is fairly expensive. There is a great demand for people wanting a
nice home but not a large lot to take care of.
Question: Where is the driveway located?
Answer: Just south of the commercial building.
Comment: These seems like zero lot line properties.
Answer: Not zero lot line; they will have setbacks on each side.
Question: Peytonville traffic is horrible in the morning. Does the plan include making
changes to the development access from Peytonville (i.e. turning left onto Peytonville)?
Answer: There is no way they would allow us to break the median for people to turn left
from the development onto Peytonville. All the traffic from our development will be right
in and right out.
Comment: U-turns on Peytonville will be tricky. Some of these people might come
down to the first entrance of Southlake Woods, turn into the neighborhood and exit left
onto Peytonville.
Question: Empty lot to the south of the driveway, are you planning on acquiring that?
Answer: We offered to purchase the empty lot, and it was not accepted.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Southlake Connect Results for the October 22, 2024 SPIN Town Hall Forum
10/29/24, 2:38 PM
Everbridge - Reports
Everbridge Suite
City of Southlake - Citizen Alert (organization Admin)
Logout
IsliI
Dashboard Universe
Notifications Incidents Contacts Reports Settings Access
Reports a Detailed Notification Analysis a SPIN Town Hall Forum - October 22nd
e
Detailed Notification Analysis
SPIN Town Hall Forum - October 22nd
DETAILS
call Results
■ 242 (2.05%) Attempted -
Notification ID 1817872288454716
if
confirmed
Notification
NO
8898 (73.52%) Attempted
Mode Live
- Not Con6mred
■ Attempted -
Notification
Standard
Connected
Not Not Connectted
Type
■ 2513 (2124%) Not
Start Date Oct 15, 2024
Attempted
Start Time 14:15:53 CDT
■ 102 (0.8e%) Other
Confirmation Yes
Hide Details
Requested
Call Throttling Yes
Call Results(per Delivery Path)
Total
%of Total
Duration 6 hr(s)
Message
Attempted - Confirmed
Voicelrext
Formal
Voicemall Message Only
Confirmed
242
2.05%
Preference
DeliveryOrder Organization Default
Attempted- Not Confirmed
Delivery Methods
Organization Contacts
1.Primary SMS
Delivered
57
0,48%
2.Secondery SMS
3.Primary Email
4.1primary Mobile
Delivered -To Voicemall
1775
15.00%
5.Seoondery Email
5.Secondary Mobile
7.Home Phone
Not Delivered - No Answer
123
1.04%
B.Home Phone 42
9.Business Phone
10.TTY / TTD Device
Delivered -To Handset
2947
24.91 %
11.Everbridge Mobile Ap
Resident Connection
1.VOIP
Not Delivered - Voicemall Hung
123
1,04%
2.1-andline
Up
Not Delivered - Recipient Hung Up
387
3.27%
Sent
3286
27.77%
Attempted • Not Connected
Not Delivered -Invalid Number
63
0.53%
Not Delivered - Out of Service
133
1.12%
Not Delivered - Carrier Expired
10
0.00%
UPDATE: Learn how to avoid phishing and vishing attacks here. Asa reminder, Everbridge will never call, email, or text you X
and ask for your account information, or direct you to a link to make changes to your account.
hops:((manager.everbridge.neNreports/noofication/view/1817872288454716 1/2
10(29/44, 2:38 PM Everbridge - Reports
Call Results(per Delivery Path)
Total
% of Total
Not Delivered -Carrier Rejected
4
0.03%
Not Delivered -Line Busy
6
0.05%
Not Attempted
Not Attempted -Inactive Path
263
2.22%
Not Attempted-Unsubscribed
1427
12.06%
Not Delivered -Contact Path Not
B
0.07%
Defined
Not Delivered -Duplicate Path
815
6.89%
Not Delivered -Bounced Email 99 0.84%
Not Delivered -Contact 3 0.03%
Unavailable
Attempts Over Time
7.5k
Sk
2-5k - ...
ok
rp'
Show Detells
1eveebridger
Pr Pollcy Terms of Use ® 2024 Everbridge, Inc.
24.8.0.8-705d2c5-2024-10-1"8:19 FE-VERSION0 ebs-manager-portal-866554d88f-wv7l5
UPDATE: Learn how to avoid phishing and vishing attacks here. As a reminder, Everbridge will never call, email, or text you
and ask for your account information, or direct you to a link to make changes to your account.
https:/(manager.everbridge.net(reportsfnotification/view/181787228845471 B 2/2