Loading...
SPIN2023-15 - Carillon ParcQJ SOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2023-15 City Case Number: ZA23-0045 Project Name: Carillon Parc SPIN Neighborhood: 3 Meeting Date: August 8, 2023 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 30 Hosts: Danny Batsalkin Applicant Presenting: John Terrell City Staff Present: Madeline Prater, Business Manager Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on "I Want to" and "View" "Video on Demand" — forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation: Northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Kirkwood Blvd. Development Details: • Proposing updates at Carillon Parc on approximately 42 acres located at northeast corner of North White Chapel Boulevard and East Kirkwood Boulevard within Spin Neighborhood number three. • Interim concept plan that did not get approved because it was presented for the library and performing arts for the city. City backed out of commitment due to financials and the economy. • Site Plan has been modified to accommodate a possible future library. • Revision number one would allow developer to commence construction of five single family homes on lots along Riviera. Approvals require all infrastructure to be in place and be approved by the city before construction begins. Reason is to make sure all utilities are in place. • Opportunity with five builders to do a project with St. Jude to build five model homes. • Revision number two would allow the developer flexibility to develop retail restaurant, office, or private club if public library is not built within the development, leaving option for library use. • Revision number three would allow the developer the option to combine the two buildings into one building allowing for potential underground parking. • Revision number four would allow an optional detention/retention pond with fountain if needed for storm drainage. Done only if right of way and access easement for the drainage to go across the other track is not obtained. Builder will assume cost of maintenance of the fountain. • Revision number five would allow dedication of future valet and drop-off to be provided in Phase 1A. Cost of roadway will be escrows within Phase 1. • Entrance from the frontage road along Highway 114 is the only spot that entrance can occur because of weaving requirements by TXDOT from the exit ramp of 114 down from Whites Chapel. Working with TXDOT on a program where they are going to reverse the ramps which would allow for two main entrances and exits on the frontage road. Asking the city to approve if the state changes the ramps and reverses them. Presentation: r .'a CARILLON SPIN MEETING + US 08,2023 v « 1 f F -- ' -��, PE Kimley #Horn EASTMAN 0 PRI VIOU1 LAVLLGPKLNt PLAN i Ihrtmm Gk V[t0PMkNt PLAN TONING UPDATE REVISION #1 `Allow '.I, e developer to cC' u u _ r: L. � t.on of five (5) single fcr -I-)mes or ots al,-: is r rl --,e infrastructure is Su fl h'- *I) s.' REVISION #2 "Allow the developer f _ : elop retail restaurant, office or prit ,t r h -f Ii of hL:i!t within the developmer.t, !ejr•g Jp,lun for IdAdry use (Z7,980 SF with 2 stories over parkfng garage)," REVISION #3 "The de,, l r , r -• iestinF; the option to combine the tv. _ -I ;,.: i It._: _ I-_ �. ,Ding (23,100 SF), allowing for r I id; rIn-l.rd parking." RLVISION d• 'I it -r-. t i Ian Dond wit I I.r':II`I If needed f I, I v-I ,_• I cost of m=;r ` -,1nce of the foil -'t ::n RLVISIGN 1;OW dedication of fUtJFe valet and drop off to be ,provided i tease 1A. Cost of roadway will be escrowed within Phase 1. Klmley *Horn .. II :. ii','. hA.TIVE SITE PLAN 1�l�1lllll � �I�_I-��II�lIf9 �V 4 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ►{wt+L'll►CRf:���iili7C�L'[:f I Allow the developer to commence construction of five (5) single family homes on lots along Riviera once infrastructure is sufficient to buiid those homes." Under the, urrent 2c Wing approval, no home may start on the project Li : all of } - infrastru[ture is ita place for the entirety ofthe ae f xnces. The p..: p u r e . ` the _ • .-: t to obtain earlier permits to construct the S o = allow custom hence builders to partner with St o five (5) Drearn -urnes (fine hurne each). These'- I r -L,-faded and dlluw the builders to receive nano ._11 er.:_o:.ire ina cc0i" tiun _f Lhese first 5 homes Thi• „ ui -h I 'o th stom'homes to folio%t fte f ._ f ,.tr,., r ;' ..-eptance by the City of Suuthlake. These . ' o' ' = r constructed sim .il'..: i I II essen 0e total tlrn`_ of _uintruction on Rlviei 1 ind 1, t' lifer to the resldents to fature home constructiun triter- r to the vice, This is made pus, i4ble because utilitles are air e. thlili Rlvlera to serve these lots. Kirnley ,o Horn ZONING REVISION #2 `Allow the developer flexibility for the option to develop recoil restaurant, office, or public library on the eastern edge of the development 11 The City of 5 ulla. ilkmade the dec 5 on o r in•mc tl }.,li,_ Li a , f•n i the QaFiier x i r i rcaah based u'i r co i-•_rn r J is t r- rrly ar,4±ications. 2) The de,;: is requestirrg to substitute another architecturally sigriificant. Iadllty t _arne Bocati--n Jr' c'e the library was being proposed. In the develop ",u al I -i I, w would be approved for a tax generating specialty t II ri-taurar. Lr�i— or a L78RARy,within the previously proposed 8.9 acre park 11 -ic dtvr loper proposos to include the library as a permitted use as there IT 1' :,� an opportunity to re -address the library Issue should the economy not L� is a--latile in 202412025 (when that building would be (onstructed), thu,, Lr s, ring the option for ttte library to be located in Carillon Part shun J ' ,un iol=Lnditions change For the city. As the city's study showed, the best location for the library is at Carillon Part. 4) The park dedication would be reduced from 8-9 acres to 7.8 acres to allow for the new commercial building. however, should the city and developer mutually agree upon Lerrns to construct the library in the corning year, the developer would agree to dedicate the land back to the city. A private drive has been identified that would access the building, but would be public It library constructed Kitri #Horn ..,.a, ZONING REVISION H3 "i he developer is requesting the option to combine the two buildings into one bullding, allowing; for potentronal underground parking:' 1) If the buildings remain as currently approved, underground parking cannot be achieved Z) It is the goal of the developer to achieve more square footage with a larger building while providing much needed parking on this westernp side of the project. I I � � r ,.4 j] iumley 0 morel ....... ZONING REVISION #4 "Optional detention/retention pond with fountain if needed for storm dralnape. If built, developer will assume costof maintenance of the fountain" .I � .-!.I•: -���r�-. r.'rezentronpnnc Kimley ,0 Horn ..., per "C h491MMINIMl`9C IM161 "ROW dedication of future valet and drop-off to be provided in Phase 1A. Cost of roadway will be escrowed within Phase 1.0 LEGEND a nw. .ww rs+r�k 4e/e /fis � +YY1fMw 1111�"p. ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN Kimley jo Horn - F, Rd A. 4w irv" yjgr AM No Text Kimley 7)Horn PERKINS- ILL.o14 LKoV,N EASTMAN Online Comment, Questions, and Concerns Forms: Comment: It looks beautiful, and we are excited. Question: What will happen with traffic on White Chapel? Is there going to be any expansion of the road? Answer: Expanding Whites Chapel to a four -lane divided with a median with all the turn lanes that have been approved by the state will mirror what is South of SH114 coming all the way through to Kirkwood. Comment: I love the proposed changes. Question: When do you think the dirt moving is going to be done and roads complete? Answer: Late Fall. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Southlake Connect Results for the August 8, 2023, SPIN Town Hall Forum 8/11/23, 1:26 PM r Everbridge Suite NAo Dashboard Universe Notifications Incidents Reports > Detailed Notification Analysis > SPIN Town Hall Forum -August 8th Detailed Notification Analysis SPIN Town Hall Forum -August 8th DETAILS Call Results Everbridge- Notifications City of Southlake - Citizen Alert (Organization Admin) Contacts Reports Settings Access Notification ID 1072506484036514 Notification Mode Live Notification Standard Type Start Date Aug 1, 2023 StartTime 10:13:14 CDT Confirmation Yes Hide Details Requested Call Throttling Yes Call Results(per Delivery Path) Duration 6 hi Message Voice/Text Attemp^.ev-t:onf.rs7a-i Format voicemail Message Only Confirmed Preference Delivery Order Organization Default Attempted - Not Confirmed Delivery Methods Organization Contacts 1.Primary SMS Delivered 2.Secondary SMS 3.Primary Email 4.Primary Mobile Delivered - To Voicemail 5.Secondary Emai I 6.Secondary Mobile 7-Home Phone Not Delivered -No Answer 8-Home Phone #2 9-Business Phone 10.TTY / TTD Device Delivered -To Handset 11.Everbridge Mobile AIR Resident Connection 1.VOIP Not Delivered - Voicemail Hung 2.Landline Up Not Delivered - Recipient Hung Up Sent P.ttempted 40*C- nne'cted Not Delivered - Invalid Number Not Delivered - Out of Service Not Delivered - Carrier Expired Not Delivered - Downstream Communication Error https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification/view/l 072506484036514 ■ 265 (2.37%)Attempted - Confrmed ■ 8470 (75.88%)Attempted - Not Confirmed 0271 (2.43%) Attempted - Not Connected 2077 (18.61 %) Not Attempted 0 79 (0.71%) Other Total 265 33 1681 122 2829 151 405 3249 82 98 12 71 of Total 2.37 % 0.30 % 16.06% 1.09 % 25.34% 1.35 % 3.63 % 29.11 % 0.73 % 0.88 % 0.11 % 0.64% n 112 8/11/23, 1:26 PM Everbridge- Notifications Call Resu Its(per Delivery Path) Total % of Total Not Delivered - Carrier Rejected 2 0.02% Not Delivered - Line Busy 6 0.05% Ncs Attempted Not Attempted - Inactive Path 214 1.92% Not Attempted - Unsubscribed 1083 9.70 % Not Delivered - Contact Path Not Defined 6 0.05% Not Delivered - Duplicate Path 774 6.93% Ukher Not Delivered - Bounced Email 75 0.67% Not Delivered - Contact Unavailable 4 0.04% Attempts Over Time 7.5k 5k 2.5k ok _.. ti� ti3 ti3 ti� ti� o o o o o Show Details '10imirbridger Privacy Policy, I Terms of Use I © 2023 Everbridge, Inc. 23.4.0.12-2023-07-21-09:33 FE-VERSION 0 manager-prod-us-green-1-0020bb36fOccef2ef h ttp s://m anager. everbri dge.n et/reports/n otifi cati onlvi ew/l 072506484036514 212