SPIN2022-10-300 ParkwoodUSOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2022-10
City Case Number:
Project Name:
SPIN Neighborhood
Meeting Date:
Meeting Location:
Total Attendance:
�►D_1
300 Parkwood Dr.
10
April 26, 2022
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Hosts: Madeline Oujesky
Applicant Presenting: Gerald Ward, Ward Architecture PLLC, Phone: (817)281-5600,
Email: Gerald (u-)-wardarchitecturepllc.com
City Staff Present: Madeline Oujesky, Assistant to the Director
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on "I Want to" and "View"
"Video on Demand" — forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation:
The property is located at 300 Parkwood Dr.
Development Details:
An applicant is proposing to develop an approximately 10,000 sq ft medical office building.
Proposed building is a one story building and are maintaining the integrity of the tree
preservation area. One structure, with four separate office spaces.
Presentation:
HIE
1 300 Packwood Er, Southlake X Q 817
SF.ow seacl iesulrs for 300 Fah__ f '°�1W41 ar.. s9 wP e2D _tl9 lag Sal 9s
aw
who., --
Ctip.i °U" E �+, rAhlik4 ELI
111 191 C, 0'q 171
211 U1
ta5 315 335 415 425 525 y5 491 fll
l - T51
I I '� 3!1 a1 451
Ee
rm+o+ a~a�'� 195 �f
1 1a5 i5ltot / no 601
400\"�`' gem Rucker k9
J � 50a r / 9Ea
7
'AP Q1 9W \� T9t
33t so 915 391
361 ' sty rle.1 mx ,k9 we m +07 +m4ao mapa
403 Elam eery
m5 4W &hgo4 f 791
1 ni
51a
31 23L "1 000 W1 1 5p7 tl9 ,'�
\��OOft 29 137 atq 5W Sri 1 9a5 i / .(/`� rM
.n c a9f ea Clty of FortWorth, Clty of5outhlake,Terrant County College, Texas Parks& WIlldGfe, Esri, HERE,,,
---------------
- _
I I
I I
I
I
r:
y
Proposed Medi ral Office E Idg- I
. ..:.: 80, x 143' I
10, 70 sgft I
RVAToN AREA (1:150 pa king ratio)
LNC RBAE AREA t a parking s ace5retgU1 d I
Fes. 80 parking sp ces p—d d
I I
lII T f` I
I II i P Nf.,ARR N Ili"
I I
66
-- ----� I-- — i----_
____________ _•_____——_ " —________________
--
' SITE PLAN
EAST ELEVATION !FRONT STREET
0 WEST ELEVATION (REAR PARKING LOT)
NORTH•N (PARKING LOT SUE)
D�,y�00R PLAN
-------------
0 SOUTH ELEVATION (TREE PRESERVATION SIDE)
�. 7
- as•
Questions and Concerns:
Ci i� z�1, Q1: Expresses concern and desire for the road (Parkwood Dr.) remain closed.
C1, Al: We don't plan on connecting the road or any road work. We are only doing roadwork on
a private road between Calloway's and ourselves.
C1, Q2: For the record, going forward, can the map correctly depict that Parkwood is in fact not
connected so that someone does not think that it is or can be.
C1, A2: (Madeline Oujesky) This image was taken from our interactive map. Because of the way
the properties are lined it looks like it is connected. When you look at the map without those lines, it
clearly shows that the roads are separate.
Citizen 2, Q1: What times will this property be occupied as a medical facility?
C2, Al: Being a doctor's office it would be 8-5, 8-6 scenario. I will check with the city. Possibly
Saturdays, but office hours. We want the light to be pointed at the building or on the property as much
as possible.
C2, Q2: How will this property be lit? and how much of that lighting will be projected into the
neighborhood?
C2, A2: We do not have a photometric yet, but we will as part of the sight plan. We will have
parking lot pole lights. As required by the city the lighting from those poles will have to remain on the
property only. No lighting plan for the tree reservation area.
C2, Q3: Is there going to be a sidewalk connecting the parking lot to Parkwood cul-de-sac? I
don't think there is a sidewalk on Parkwood, so it would just be connected to the street directly.
C2, A3: Yes. We thought it might be useful, if not we can take it out.
C2, Q4: Suggestion of shrubs or trees along Parkwood to shield the view of the building from the
neighborhood.
does?
C2, Q5: Do the Stations of the Cross path go through your property and will it be disturbed if it
C2, A5: We will go back and look. If we find anything we will work with the church to fix it.
Citizen 3, Q1: Are you requesting any zoning changes from what is already approved?
C3, Al: No. We are just looking for a site plan approval.
C3, Q2: Do you have an estimate of traffic flow per day?
C3, A2: We can do a traffic study but I don't have that right now.
C3, Q3: If the businesses there failed, what kind of businesses would you potentially bring in? Is
it restricted by the zoning and have to be other medical?
C3, A3: I will have to check that. Whatever it is zoned as now is what we are building for and
what they would be limited to. If they wanted to go beyond that they would need City Council approval.
C3, Q4: Are you going to keep the tree preservation area and there won't be any disturbance or
footpaths or recreation there?
C3, A4: We are keeping the preservation area untouched.
C3. Q5: Please consider renaming the segment of Parkwood that Calloway's and 300 Parkwood
is on to prevent confusion with delivery drivers.
C3, Q6: Request map to reflect the segments of Parkwood not being connected.
Citizen 4, Q1: When will we get the information about the lighting?
C4, Al: After this meeting we will pull together a packet and it will have the photometrics there.
C4, Q2: What is the timing of when the lights will be on? I have a bedroom that would face the
entire building. I don't want the lights on.
C4, A2: I don't know.
C4, Q3: Why do we need the connection path to the cul-de-sac? Concern for additional traffic.
C4, A3: We thought it would be good for quick drop offs. We can remove if it is an issue.
C4, Q4: How high is the retaining wall and will there be a fence on top of it? It needs something
to block the enormous building from the neighborhood.
C4, A4: 3-4 ft tall retaining wall, and the previous man had a good idea of using landscape
instead of a wall to block the view.
C4, Q5: How many feet from the retaining wall to the property line?
C4, A5: Approximately 50-55 ft.
C4, Q6: Are the black circles all the trees that will be gone?
C4, A6: We had a tree survey done, we may be able to save the ones closer to the cul-de-sac.
Where we must disturb the ground, we will lose those trees. We are trying to minimize the amount of
trees we lose.
C4, Q7: Where is the main entrance?
C4, A7: The right side, to the left off the private road.
C4, Q8: How many businesses inside?
C4, A8: One building housing 4 tenants.
C4, Q9: What kind of businesses will they be? Any sort of medical business?
C4, A9: We don't have them rented yet. Will be some sort of professional medical office.
Doctor's offices, that type of thing.
Citizen 5, Q1: Traffic flow study would be good. If this is a medical office open from 8-5 why do we even
need those? Not being on 24/7.
C5, Al: We will look at it, it's a cost for the developer. The lights accommodate the staff that
may arrive early or stay late. We will have lights on the exterior of the building that will stay on all night,
but not the ones in the parking lot.
C5, Q2: Reiterate not connecting Parkwood Dr. and fixing map.
C5, Q3: Why create a walkway that attracts alternative parking solutions? Causing additional
traffic and parking..
Citizen 6, Q1: What type of medical practice of the tenants, and what type of hazardous material the
medical facility will produce?
C6, Al: We are not looking to rent to labs or anything like that. Just doctors offices such as
psychiatrist, dentist, family doctor, or specialist. Nothing out of the ordinary on hazardous materials.
Online Comments:
1) Against the development, wishes for the field with wildflowers be preserved.
2) Against the development. Empty medical office buildings everywhere. Additional buildings and
traffic flow would be unsafe for kids and families walking. Concern for displaced animals.
A: We will do traffic study as part of the site plan submission. Doing this building with the least
amount of impact. We are keeping about 1/2 - 1/3 of the tree preservation area to not be developed
at all. We are not asking for rezoning. We are trying to design the building fit within what is already
there.