Loading...
Item 6B - Staff ReportItem 613 CITY OF S0UTHLA1<%,E Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT February 25, 2025 CASE NO: ZA25-0002 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for 2665 & 2735 N White Chapel Blvd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Sage Group, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Schelling Property on property described as Tract 3D01, Rees D. Price Survey Abstract No. 1207 and Lot 3, Joel W. Chivers Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2665 and 2735 N. White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. SPIN Neighborhood #1. DETAILS: This project is approximately 10.85-acres of land generally located on the east side of N. White Chapel Blvd., approximately 1600 feet north of the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Dove Rd. The purpose of this request is to seek approval for a zoning change and development plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development for ten residential lots and two open space lots. Nine of the residential lots will have access on a new cul-de-sac street and the tenth lot will have access directly onto N. White Chapel Blvd. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot size of 25,000 square feet, a minimum house size of 3,000 square feet, a maximum lot coverage of 45%, and a net density of 0.995 dwelling units/acre. Following the City Council meeting on February 18, 2025, the applicant has provided a revised development plan that includes a landscape easement along White Chapel Blvd. in the Oncor transmission easement. The applicant has also provided an updated Tree Conservation Plan which revises the total existing tree canopy from 22.15% to 21.98% and changes the protected tree canopy from 71.82% to 71.60%. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider 2nd Reading Approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 25, 2025 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-829 Plans Case No. ZA25-0002 Narrative and Development Regulations Presentation Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Case No. ZA25-0002 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Martin Schelling APPLICANT: Martin Schelling PROPERTY SITUATION: 2665 & 2735 N White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, Texas. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tract 3D01, Rees D. Price Survey Abstract No. 1207 and Lot 3, Joel W. Chivers Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2665 and 2735 N. White Chapel Blvd. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District. PROPOSED ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. HISTORY: January 16, 2003; Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a variance request to allow a minimum lot area of four hundred thirty-two thousand (432,000) square feet after right-of-way dedication. "AG" zoned property is required to have a minimum lot area of 435,600 square feet. (ZBA-402) January 21, 2003; City Council approved a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 3.03.D.22, as amended, requiring dedication of general utility easements along the perimeter boundary of subdivision plats. (ZA02-122) April 2, 2003; the plat for Lot 3, Joel W. Chivers Addition was recorded. SOUTHLAKE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The future land use designation for the site is "Low Density Residential". Purpose: The purpose of the Low Density Residential category is to provide provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake. Definition: The Low Density Residential category is for detached single- family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which excludes acreage in all rights -of -way, easement, and lots designated for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories. The Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of Southlake. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: This property accesses N. White Chapel Blvd, which is designated as a (C2U - 70') collector and has one access point to the road. Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 1 TREE PRESERVATION: There is 21.98% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover is required to be preserved. Approximately 71.60% of existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved, and 6.2% is proposed as "Marginal" to be preserved. PARK DEDICATION: There is no public park dedication proposed. Park dedication requirements will be assessed through park dedication fees based on the adopted rate at the time of any final subdivision platting. UTILITIES: An 8-inch water line and fire hydrant will be installed to serve the lots, extended from the existing 12-inch water line located along N. White Chapel Blvd. An 8-inch sanitary sewer will be installed. DRAINAGE: A private drainage easement will be required along the rear of Lot 1 to allow for cross lot drainage and between Lots 9 and 10. The detention pond shall be located within a dedicated drainage easement. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: February 6, 2025, APPROVED (6-0) subject to Staff Report dated January 31, 2025, and Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 31, 2025, with a suggestion to the applicant to maintain communication with surrounding landowners and to provide an alternative plan that might reduce Lot 8 so that Lot 3 and Lot 4 will increase in size or lose either Lot 3 or Lot 4. CITY COUNCIL: February 18, 2025: 1 st Reading APPROVED (4-2), subject to Staff Report dated February 11, 2025, and Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 31, 2025, noting that the approval is for a zoning change and development plan from "AG" to "RPUD" as presented and with the applicant's willingness to consider open space options at both the entry and the rear that are consistent with the discussion and possible suggestions tonight. CITIZEN INPUT: This item was heard by the Corridor Planning Committee on 11/13/2024. This item was presented to SPIN on 12/10/2024. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 31, 2025. Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 2 01 PO Map Z 25-0002 2665 N White Chapel Blvd, 2735 N White Chapel Blvd Legend N City Parcels Right Of Way City Limit r Case Parcel(s) 0 dissolvedparcel ti 200 Foot Buffer 300 Foot Buffer 300 600 Feet bufferCut Parcels Within Buffer CE rowClip Case No. ZA25-0002 Attachment C Page 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA25-0002 Review No.: Three Name: Development Plan — 2665 & 2735 N. White Chapel Blvd. APPLICANT: Martin Schelling 2665 N. White Chapel Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-475-3335 Email: martintxcre(@amail.com Date of Review: 02/25/25 Owner: Martin Schelling 2665 N. White Chapel Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-475-3335 Email: martintxcren-amail.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/25/25 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT WAYNE POWELL AT (817) 748-8281. 1. Provide the metes and bounds description of the property. 2. Ensure that right-of-way dedication meeting the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and the Master Thoroughfare Plan is being provided for N. White Chapel Blvd. which is designated as a 70' wide right-of-way for a two lane collector road (70' — C2U). Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 4 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The submitted Tree Conservation Plan complies with the existing tree cover preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 21.98% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum of 71.60% of existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved, and 6.20% is proposed as "Marginal" to be preserved. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% — 20% 70% 20.1 — 40% 60% 40.1 % - 60% 50% 60.1 % - 80% 40% 80.1 % - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights -of -way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 5 areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuantto this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 6 Public Works/Engineering Review Sandra Endy, P.E. Development Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendy@ci.southIake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Sidewalk is required along the street frontage. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: * A private drainage easement will be required along the rear of Lot 1 to allow for cross lot drainage and between Lots 9 and 10. * The detention pond shall be located within a dedicated drainage easement. UTILITY COMMENTS: * The proposed sewer line located within the proposed easement should be centered in the easement where it isn't shared with the storm pipe. * The sewer pipe located below the detention pond will require a steel encasement. * Per city code of ordinances, Chapter 19, Article 111, the developer shall install a sewage collection system that extends to the development's borders and throughout the development. Lot 1 is not being provided sewer and will be required to have sewer extended to this lot. * The existing water meters not being utilized will be required to be removed. Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 7 Fire Department Review Lorenzo Chavez Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: Ichavez@ci.southlake.tx.us FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un- sprinklered homes. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire access roads in residential subdivision must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) Cul-de-Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 50-foot radius (100-foot diameter) for approved turnaround. (Listed cul-de-sac diameter does not meet this requirement) Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 8 General Informational Comments In a PUD, open space areas shall not include retention and detention ponds of drainage easements in excess of 25% of the total open space. Please clarify the actual amount of open space provided, less any detention area exceeding 25% and ensure open space remains consistent with the development plan compliant with the minimum 10% required. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Building permit(s) are required prior to commencement of any work. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 and execution of an avigation easement and release on any subsequent plat. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Dedication Fee, Roadway Impact Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. All conditions of this zoning approval and the related ordinances will continue with any future requests related to the property. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA25-0002 Page 9 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES 7 A ` \ n3s 9 6 \ 1no1 i m IE 12 nou a 2132 15 — m 2693 20 2639 � 3filfi 2M6 24 SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 BRUCE AND BARBARA BARBE REVOCA AG 106 SWEET ST 0.08 NR 2 JENNIFER GREEN GODETTE REVOCAB AG 116 SWEET ST 0.09 NR 3 CASTILLO TITO, JULIO AG 126 SWEET ST 0.10 NR 4 WILLIAMS, KEVIN AG 136 SWEET ST 0.09 NR 5 RADAFORD, JOHN AG 105 SWEET ST 0.36 F 6 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 2950 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.72 NR 7 RADAFORD, JOHN AG 105 SWEET ST 0.22 F 8 THACKER, KEVIN L AG 125 SWEET ST 0.43 F 9 NAPHTALI AND JACQUELINE BEN- ME AG 143 SWEET ST 1.35 NR Case No. ZA25-0002 Attachment D Page 1 10 BONNEY, BARTON M RPUD 421 MARSHALL RD 0.01 NR 11 WELLEN, DARRELLJ RPUD 419 MARSHALL RD 0.22 F 12 HUNT, GARY RPUD 2800 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.37 NR 13 KAUTZMAN, JAY RPUD 2808 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.35 0 14 COFFEY, CRAIG RPUD 2732 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.40 NR 15 KORIAKUNTA, SIVA AG 225 SWEET ST 2.17 NR 16 NELSON, RODNEY K RPUD 417 MARSHALL RD 0.42 NR 17 OAK POINTE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA RPUD 2716 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 1.16 NR 18 TUTLE, PAUL RPUD 415 MARSHALL RD 0.76 NR 19 ADEKOLA, ADEKUNLE RPUD 2708 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.55 NR 20 BROWN, BRITTON RPUD 2624 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.56 NR 21 CARROLL, ISD SP1 2520 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.02 NR 22 ORDONEZ LIVING TRUST RPUD 2616 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.58 NR 23 HADLEY, ROBERT AG 2573 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.90 F* 24 CROSS LIVING TRUST RPUD 2608 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.58 F 25 MCKEOWN, KENNETH AG 2561 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.90 NR 26 AFOLABI, OLADAPO RPUD 2600 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.32 NR 27 ESSENSA, MARC SF1-A 2535 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.07 F 28 WILLIAMS, BRIAN D SF1-A 2525 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.23 F 29 BENNETT, TAMARA SF1-A 180 SWEET ST 1.35 NR 30 ALLEN, MARC RPUD 2809 SUMMIT RIDGE DR 0.73 NR 31 BECICKA, BRANDON RPUD 423 MARSHALL RD 0.43 NR 32 KATZ LIVING TRUST RPUD 309 OAK POINTE LN 0.53 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA25-0002 Page 2 33 SHARKEY MARK A FAMILY TRUST RPUD 2725 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.52 NR DR 34 NSL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC RPUD 413 MARSHALL RD 0.71 NR 35 ABIODUN TRUST RPUD 2709 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.53 NR DR 36 POTTER, JASON RPUD 2701 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.54 NR DR 37 RABY, NICOLAS L RPUD 2625 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.59 NR DR 38 MEGAMO TEXAS PROPERTY RPUD 2617 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.52 NR MANAGEME DR 39 HAMEL, JAMES W RPUD 2609 SUMMIT RIDGE 0.58 NR DR 40 KENNETH AND JOAN SORG AG 2825 N WHITE CHAPEL 7.17 NR FAMILY BLVD 41 VISWANATH, KARTHIK AG 142 SWEET ST 1.11 NR 42 BLOOMING LEGACY HOMES LLC SF1-A 170 SWEET ST 1.10 NR 43 BENNETT, TAMARA SF1-A 220 SWEET ST 1.53 NR 44 OAK POINTE HOME OWNERS RPUD 300 OAK POINTE LN 2.43 NR ASSOCIA 45 OAK POINTE HOME OWNERS RPUD 2717 SUMMIT RIDGE 3.99 NR ASSOCIA DR 46 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 200 E DOVE RD 19.66 NR 47 SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL NR ISD 1000 SCHELLING, MARTIN W AG 2665 N WHITE CHAPEL 9.94 BLVD 1001 SCHELLING, MARTIN W AG 2735 N WHITE CHAPEL 1.05 BLVD Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Forty-seven (47) Responses Received within 300': In Favor: 7 (*Six written responses; one spoke in favor at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting) Opposed: 1 Undecided: 0 Case No. Attachment D ZA25-0002 Page 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-829 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3D01, REES D. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1207, AND LOT 3, JOEL W. CHIVERS ADDITION, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "TZD" TRANSITION ZONING DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 2 at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: [*-1 *01 M ki 51 That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tract 3D01, Rees D. Price Survey Abstract No. 1207 and Lot 3, Joel W. Chivers Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 3 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 5 ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2025. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2025. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Metes and Bounds Description Reserved for metes and bounds description Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 8 Reserved for approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment E ZA25-0002 Page 9