Item 6B - SPIN ReportUSOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
[+y�1►�fL�i'i1►[7liiil• - y�1►f�•IlyZ�iE:3
City Case Number: ZA25-0002
Project Name: 2665 N. White Chapel Blvd.
SPIN Neighborhood: 1
Meeting Date: December 10, 2024
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 9
Hosts: Madeline Prater
Applicant Presenting: Martin Schelling
City Staff Present: Madeline Prater, Business Manager
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation: 2665 N. White Chapel Blvd.
Development Details:
• Proposed 10 single-family residential lots
o Minimum lot size — 25,053 s.f.
o Average lot size — 37,766 s.f.
• 2 open space lots
• Gross Acreage — 10.85 ac
• Gross Density — 0.92/units per ac.
Presentation:
a
•\ oETENnO'a
AREA �y
1 {'
- � J
v,a—:
I�dl
Concept Plan 2665 N White Chapel Property
�, Tarrant @My, T
n�u i
IT—
----------------
Ple-.
feel
®� � Concept Plan 26G� N White Chapel Propei�tti-
Comments, Questions, and Concerns:
Q: Unintelligible — did not use microphone
A: I have not made up my mind whether I will be the developer for these lots or not.
C: That's concerning because of the ability to complete the project in a timely manner.
Q- You know about the development going on Ridgecrest?
A: Maykus Homes
Q: Will you team up with a developer like that for this project?
A: I have spoken to Maykus Homes about this project, but I have not made a deal yet.
Q- Approval process to partner with a home builder?
A: Yes.
Q: Did you consider the properties that are sitting on an acre when you looked at the
surrounding neighborhood? Wingate Hill.
A: Those are basically 1 '/4 acre lots.
C: I would like to see one -acre lots over here, not small half acre lots.
A: Okay.
C: My concern is lot 9 and lot 10 is where the overflow of water / irrigation path for
drainage. I'm worried about the flow of drainage on or to my property.
A: There is a storm sewer pipe that goes in that location to pick up storm water. We'll
need to take existing pipe out and place storm/sewer system down the street from
White Chapel, because we get water from the school, we'll place an enclosed
storm/sewer system to pick it up.
C: My house is right behind lot 9 and its very close to the boundary line. I would like to
see this built at a level where they can't see into my pool/side yard from a 2-3 story
house. Prefer to see a one -level home.
C: Where the cul-du-sac comes out on the bend, drivers are too fast through there. I'm
not sure if anyone has looked at the amount of traffic that will come through there once
they fix the bridge.
Q: The existing pond — is that Waters of the U.S.? Is it a wetland or an environmental
feature
A: No, there is nothing on this property for Waters of the U.S.
C: Concerns with multiple home developments, especially Ridgecrest — it's a nine -home
development that started Spring 2022 and only 2-3 homes are completed. 4 homes are
in some shape of being completed, and 2 homes have not started. It will likely be years
before they complete this. We've experienced too much noise, dust, traffic and other
disturbances. Construction traffic around the school is worrisome.
C: I'm a resident in Wingate Hills, my concern is that once we start approving half -acre
lots here, there is a lot of farmland and acreage that could be developed on with smaller
lots sizes and 3-story townhomes. We've had beautiful views of pastures, and I don't
want to have my property backed up to zero -lot line developments in the future. Please
keep it above an acre.
A: We did have a plan with no open space in the back with all one -acre homes, but it is
not as attractive as this. Council would much rather see a planned -unit residential
development than another triple-C ranch with all one acre lots. There are no quarter
acre lots in here, most lots are larger than a half -acre. This is compliant with the future
land use plan.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Southlake Connect Results for December 10, 2024 SPIN Town Hall Forum
1/28/25, 10:00 AM
Everbridge
- Reports
E""btiaye Sutte
City of Southlake
- Citizen Alert (organization Admin)
%ieo
Dashboard Universe
Notifications 7cidents Contacts
Reports Settings Access
Reports > Detailed Notification Analysis > SPIN Town Hall Forum - December 10th
Detailed Notification
Analysis
SPIN Town Nall Forum - December 1 Oth
DETAILS
226 (1.90%) Attempted -
Notification ID 1885698411989626
Confirmed
Notification
00,
8733 (73.42%) Attempted
Mode Live
- Not Confirmed
—'
8 224 (1.68%) Attempted -
Notification Standard
Not Connected
Type
N 2574 (21.64%) Not
Start Date Dee 4,2024
a$
Attempted
Start Time 16:07:20 CST
0 138 (1.16%) Other
Confirmation Yes
Hide Detalls.
Requested
Call Throttling Yes
Call Results(perDelivery Path)
Total
Duration 5 hr(s)
Message
Attempted -Confirmed
Voicelrext
Format
Voicemail Message Only
Confirmed
226
Preference
DeliveryOrder Organization Default
Attempted - Not Confirmed
Delivery Methods
Organization Contacts
1.PrimarySMS
Delivered
80
2.Secondary SMS
3. Prim ary Em ail
4. Prim aryMobile
Delivered - To Voicem all
1756
5.Secondary Email
6.Seoondery Mobile
7. Home Phone
Not Delivered - No Answer
125
8.Home Phone #2
9.Business Phone
10.TTY / TTD Device
Delivered -To Handset
2818
11.Everbridge Mobile Ap
Resident Connection
1.VOIP
Not Delivered - Voicemail Hung
147
2.1-andline
Up
Not Delivered - Recipient Hung Up
Sent
373
3434
% of Total
1.90%
0.67%
14.76%
1.05%
23.69%
1.24%
3.14%
28.87%
Attempted - Not Connected
Not Delivered - Invalid Number
3
0.03%
Not Delivered - Out of Service
136
1,14%
Not Delivered - Carrier Expired
22
0.18%
Not Delivered - Downstream
58
0.49%
Communication Error
https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notificationtview/l 885698411989626
112
12825, 10:00 AM Everbridge - Reports
Call Results(per Delivery Path)
Total
%of Total
Not Delivered - Carder Rejected
1
0.01 %
Not Delivered - Line Busy
4
0.03%
Not Attempted - Inactive Path
261
2.19%
Not Attempted - Unsubscribed
1490
12,53%
Not Delivered - Contact Path Not
8
0.07%
Defined
Not Delivered - Duplicate Path
815
6.85%
Other
Not Attempted - Bounced Email
109
0.92%
Not Delivered - Bounced Email
27
0.23%
Not Delivered - Contact
2
0.02%
Unavailable
Attempts Over Time
7.5k
Sk
2.5k
Ok
o
—
b
Show Detalls
"everbridger
Privacy Pollcr Terms of use ® 2025 Everbridge, Inc.
24,10.0.11-4614683-2024-12-06-17:15 FE-VERSIONO ebsmonager-portal-55845b8796jft7q
https://man age r.eve rbridge. net/reports/notification /view/l 885698411989626
272