Item 7A - Staff ReportCase No.
ZA24-0050
S T A F F R E P O R T
February 11, 2025
CASE NO: ZA24-0050
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Ashmun, LLC, on behalf of owners Ashruf Khan and Munawar Begum, is
requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1965 and 1975 N.
White Chapel Blvd., on property described as Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition,
an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. Current Zoning: “AG”
Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: “SF-20A” Single Family Residential
District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.
DETAILS: The subject property is approximately 2.89 acres located at 1965 and 1975 N.
White Chapel Blvd., near the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E.
Kirkwood Blvd. The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan for a 4-lot residential subdivision, including the construction of a
cul-de-sac street to provide access to N. White Chapel Blvd. The requested
zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District and the four lots range in
size from 24,808 SF to 26,992 SF. The subject property is currently 2 lots with
"AG" Agricultural District zoning.
Following the January 23, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the
applicant is proceeding with the 4-lot plan after discussions with the property
owner to the north.
VARIANCES: 1) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01G, requires lots abutting property
zoned “SF-1” to be a minimum of 30,000 square feet in area. The applicant is
requesting a variance for lot size for lots 1 and 2, which abut SF-1A zoning to the
north. Lots 1 and 2 are 24,808 SF and 26,756 respectively.
2) Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585, as amended, requires a minimum of
60% of the tree cover to be preserved based on the 22% of the existing tree
cover. The applicant is requesting to preserve 13% of the existing tree cover.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 31, 2025
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-827
Plans
Variance Request Letter
Presentation
Corridor Planning Committee Report
Case No.
ZA24-0050
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Case No. Attachment A
ZA24-0050 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Ashruf Khan and Munawar Begum
APPLICANT: Ashmun, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: “SF-20A” Single Family Residential
HISTORY: -The plat showing for Thrasher Addition was approved in September
1986 (ZA86-041).
SOUTHLAKE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The future land use designation for the site is “Mixed Use”.
The purpose of the Mixed Use category is to provide an option for large
scale, master‐planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses
such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The
range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying
proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated
development. New development must be compatible with and not
intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be
placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the
Mixed Use designation is intended for medium‐ to higher‐intensity office
buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential
uses. Nuisance‐free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly
uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be
compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those
permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi‐Public, Low
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and
Office Commercial categories.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The property is accessed off of N. White Chapel Blvd. This section of N.
White Chapel Blvd. is designated as an “A4D” 4-lane divided arterial with
88 feet of right of way.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan calls for a less than 8 ft. sidewalk along the
east side of N. White Chapel Blvd. The applicant is showing a 5 ft.
sidewalk along N. White Chapel Blvd. and along both sides of the
proposed cul-de-sac street.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA24-0050 Page 2
UTILITIES: There is a 12” water line along N. White Chapel and an 8” sanitary sewer
line in E. Kirkwood Blvd. 8” water and sanitary sewer lines will be
extended through the proposed cul-de-sac to provide service to the lots.
DRAINAGE: Lots 1, 2 & 4 drain toward the proposed street and into the N. White
Chapel drainage system. Lot 3 drain toward E. Kirkwood Blvd drainage
system. Drainage study shows no detention structure is needed. This will
be further evaluated with the constructions plans prior to development.
TREE PRESERVATION: There is 22% of existing tree cover and a minimum of 60% of the tree
cover is required to be preserved. A total of 87% of the existing tree cover
is proposed to be removed and 13% is proposed to be preserved. The
applicant has requested a variance.
CITIZEN INPUT: This item was heard by the Corridor Planning Committee Meeting on
January 30, 2024.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: January 9, 2025; Meeting cancelled due to inclement weather.
January 23, 2025; Tabled (6-0) to February 6, 2025.
February 6, 2025; DENIED (4-2).
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 31,
2025. The property owner adjacent to the north boundary of this request
has currently provided written and acknowledged opposition to the zoning
request which exceeds 20% of the surrounding area within 200 feet of the
zoning change boundary. A super majority, three-fourths of the members
of the City Council, must vote in favor of this item in order to be approved
on a 2nd reading.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA24-0050 Page 1
VICINITY MAP
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0066 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA24-0050 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 1/3/2025
Project Name: Concept Plan – 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd.
APPLICANT: ARCHITECT:
Ashruf Khan
ASHMUN LLC
P.O. Box 93502, Southlake, Tx 76092
Phone: 817-239-1243 Phone:
Email: Aliarap786@gmail.com Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
12/20/2024 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH 817-748-8072.
1. The minimum paved radius at the cul-de-sac is 50’. The current plan only shows 41’.
2. Per the Subdivision Ord. No 483, Sect. 8.01G, lots abutting property zoned “SF-1” require lots
be a minimum 30,000 square feet in area. This affects lots 1 & 2. As proposed a variance
request with justification is needed. (Variance Requested)
3. Show and label a minimum 5’ wide sidewalk connecting to any terminating sidewalks adjacent
to the north and/or south corners of the property along N. White Chapel Blvd/Kirkwood Blvd. A
minimum 5’ wide sidewalk will be required along the street frontage(s) of each lot at the time of
residential home construction in compliance with Section 5.06 of the Subdivision Ordinance
No. 483, as amended.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0066 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. The proposed existing tree cover preservation does not comply with the existing tree cover
preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 22% of existing tree
cover and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover is required to be preserved. A total of 87% of the
existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 13% is proposed to be preserved. A variance
request with justification will be needed in the narrative.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. On the Concept Plan identify and label the required west 10’ – B bufferyard.
2. On the Landscape Plan the west bufferyard is labeled East Bufferyard. Please correct the
labeling error.
3. There are a minimum of twelve (12) shrubs required in each bufferyard and only ten (10) are
shown. Please add two (2) shrubs to each bufferyard.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0066 Page 3
Public Works/Engineering Review
* Previous comments have been addressed.
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0066 Page 4
Fire Department Review
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Cul-de-Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 50-foot radius (100-foot diameter) for approved
turnaround. (Plans do not indicate approved dimensions)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un-
sprinkled homes and 600 feet for sprinklered homes.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all residential structures that exceed 6,000
square feet, excluding porches and patios.
Lorenzo Chavez
Fire Inspector
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: LChavez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0066 Page 5
General Informational Comments
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to any issuance of any permits a Plat (Preliminary Plat
followed by Plat Revision for filing in the County) must be processed and filed in the County Plat
Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited
to the following fees: Park Dedication Fee, Roadway Impact Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
See fee schedule https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/302/Applications-Fees-Submittal-Schedules
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* Please be aware that the Subdivision Plat will require dedication of ROW to achieve a
minimum overall width of ROW 88’ split along the established centerline and based existing
ROW width. Any deficiency not accounted for the proposed concept plan being presented may
affect lot area.
* It appears this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring
construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance
No. 479. Additionally, the Avigation Easement and Release shown in Appendix 3 of the
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County
Plat Records.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1 PAILES, NATHAN A SF30 108 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.060159136 NR
2 ASCENCIO, CRISTOBAL SF30 112 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.012954237 NR
3 SIMPSON, CHARLES SF30 104 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.050765366 U
4 XIONG, KEVIN SF30 100 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.060106186 NR
5 SATHY, ASHOKE ECZ 200 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.538159975 NR
6 SUAREZ, GERARDO SF1-A
2005 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.714177281 O
7 METAIRIE SOUTHLAKE INVESTORS L TZD 100 CLEARY CT 0.085343702 NR
8 JAMES, KEVIN TZD 101 CLEARY CT 0.159637096 NR
9 HYMES, JOHN ECZ 108 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.414607297 NR
10 ALMOG, JONATHAN ECZ 204 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.001801291 NR
11 SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG
1900 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.337116396 NR
12 DAVENPORT, DANIEL F ECZ 104 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.343269258 NR
13 LEE, CHARLES ECZ 100 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.373233129 NR
14 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ
100 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD 0.616592043 NR
15 CARILLON CROWN LLC ECZ
201 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD 0.191925464 NR
16 CARILLON CROWN LLC ECZ
1801 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 0.473297946 NR
17 TAVISALA, KALYANI ECZ 208 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.364212868 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 2
18 MCGOWEN, MILTON ECZ 105 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.366455675 NR
19 CARILLON CROWN LLC ECZ 1840 RIVIERA LN 2.330979116 NR
20 KEVIN HAVER ROSTRON LEGACY TRU TZD 105 CLEARY CT 0.25000632 NR
21 HW BUILDERS LLC TZD 109 CLEARY CT 0.261118117 NR
22 GOLLA, HEMANTHA ECZ 101 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.346861211 NR
23 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ
400 E KIRKWOOD
BLVD 4.695927813 NR
1000 KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1975 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 0.996836437
1001 KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1965 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.681159494
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-one (21)
Responses received: One (1) undecided and one (1) opposed, see SPO response letters.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 3
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-827
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, THRASHER ADDITION, CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED
A 1965 AND 1975 N. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD., AND MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM
“AG” AGRICULTURAL DISTICT TO “SF-20A” SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED
CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED
HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use
of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes,
and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “SF-20A” Single
Family Residential District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 4
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pe destrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect
of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and
off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas t o
control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air;
effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropri ate use of the
land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably inv ade the
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 5
existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and a ir,
prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates
the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there
is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that
there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximit y
to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were
originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for
the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at
large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety
and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be alt ered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, and located at 1965 and 1975 N. White Chapel Blvd., and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-
20A” Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 6
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the
following conditions:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texa s. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respec t to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 7
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct con flict with the provisions
of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the
balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Eac h day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordi nance; and, as
to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in
court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 8
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as
required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2025.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2025.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 9
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 10
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described Lots 1 and 2, Thrasher Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0050 Page 11
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved Concept Plan