Item 9 - Staff ReportCase No.
ZA24-0073
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 17, 2025
CASE NO: ZA24-0073
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Chapel Crossing
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Chapel Crossing Medical LTD, Eckert-Wordell, is requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Chapel Crossing on property
described as Lot 1R1 & Lot 1R2, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 245 & 275 W. S.H. 114,
Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District,
Proposed Zoning: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #
5.
DETAILS: The project is generally located at the southwest intersection of W. S.H. 114 and
N. White Chapel Blvd. adjacent to Countryside Bible Church. The purpose of this
request is to amend the current S-P-2 zoning on Lot 1R2, 275 W. SH 114, to
allow an ambulatory surgery center, in addition to the current medical office uses,
as a permitted uses and to change the building from a 3 story 22,000 SF building
to a 2 story 30,000 SF building.
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “S-P-2”
Proposed Zoning “S-P-2”
Gross/Net Acreage 6.14 ac.
Open Space Area 2.57 ac.
Open Space % 42%
Imp. Coverage Area 3.57 ac.
Imp. Coverage % 66%
Building 1 Area 3 Story 51,000 SF
Building 2 Area 2 Story 30,000 SF
Total Bldg. Area 81,000 SF
Parking required for entire site
at 1 space/225 sf per S-P-2 360
Parking Provided 360
The proposed “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District zoning will follow all uses
and regulations of the previously approved “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan
District under Ord. 480- follow the “O-1” Office District uses and regulations with
the following exceptions: include an ambulatory surgery center as a permitted
use in a 2 story 30,000 SF on Lot 1R2 at 275 W. SH 114.
Case No.
ZA24-0073
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
The following variances to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, were
approved with the original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake
Office Plaza (ZA13-106 & ZA19-0064):
1. Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on local and collector
streets. A variance is requested to allow a commercial driveway onto
Countryside Ct., which is a local street. (Please note that Countryside Ct.
serves primarily non-residential traffic).
2. Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100’ for both
driveways. A variance is requested to allow the stacking depths as shown
on the Site Plan and Concept Plans with approximately 43’ of stacking
depth shown on the E. S.H. 114 driveway and approximately 48’ of
stacking depth shown on the Countryside Ct. driveway.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider the Zoning and Concept Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 17, 2025
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-667B
- Presentation
- Narrative, “S-P-2” Regulations and Variance Request Letter
- Plans
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Jenny Crosby (817) 748-8195
Case No. Attachment A
ZA24-0073 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Chapel Crossing Medical LTD
APPLICANT: Eckert-Wordell
PROPERTY SITUATION: 245 & 275 W. S.H. 114, Southlake, Texas.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R1 & 1R2, Block A, Ravenaux Village
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1957.
- “AG” Agricultural District zoning was placed on the property with the
adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 161 and the Official Zoning Map in
1969.
- A Final Plat for Ravenaux Village was approved in January 15, 1988 and
filed January 20, 1988.
- “C-1” zoning was placed on the southern portion of the property with the
adoption of Ordinance No. 480, in September 1989.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA07-005) from "AG" Agricultural
District and "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to "S-P-2"
Generalized Site Plan District with “C-3” district uses for Chapel Crossing
Shopping Center to develop 5 buildings totaling approximately 45,000
square feet of retail floor area was approved August 7, 2007.
- A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan (ZA13-106) for Southlake
Office Plaza, from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “S-P-2”
Generalized Site Plan District for the construction of an approximately
51,000 square foot, three-story office building in the first phase (Site Plan)
and Concept Plan approval for a Phase 2 expansion with approximately
23,000 square feet of floor space was approved October 7, 2014.
- A Plat Revision for Lot 1R, Block A, Ravenaux Village (ZA14-124) was
approved December 2, 2014 and filed January 31, 2017.
- A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (Case ZA19-0063, Ord. 480-667A)
was approved by City Council on December 3, 2019, allowing a 3 story,
22,000 SF medical office building on a separate building site, and
eliminated the future expansion on the previously approved building.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Retail Commercial
which is defined in the Southlake 2035 plan as follows:
Case No. Attachment A
ZA24-0073 Page 2
Purpose and Definition: The Retail Commercial category is a lower- to
medium-intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood-type
retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is
intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve
neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this
category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby
maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This
category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned
developments.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows an existing 8’ multi-use trail along W.
Southlake Blvd. and future <8’ sidewalk along S. White Chapel Blvd. A 5’
sidewalk is required along S. White Chapel Blvd. A review comment has
been added to remove “existing” from the label since no sidewalk
currently exists. The 5’ sidewalk is required to be constructed with the
proposed development.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
No changes to the existing driveways are proposed. The site currently
has one driveway on the W. S.H. 114 frontage road and one driveway on
Countryside Ct.
Traffic Impact
A full TIA report was submitted and reviewed for this development with
the original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake Office
Plaza in 2014 (ZA13-106).
TREE PRESERVATION: For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development,
or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
Case No. Attachment A
ZA24-0073 Page 3
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural
roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the
Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement
procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: The property is served by existing 12” and 8” water lines and an existing
8” sewer line.
DRAINAGE: Drainage will generally sheet flow from west to east across the property.
CITIZEN INPUT: This request has not appeared before the Corridor Planning Committee
or SPIN.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 17,
2025.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA24-0073 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA24-0073 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 1/17/25
Project Name: Concept Plan – Chapel Crossing Phase Two; 245 W SH 114
APPLICANT: CONSULTANT:
Jared VanderWeele, Eckert-Wordell Matthew Cragun, Cumulus Design
161 East Michigan Ave 2080 N. Highway 360
Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Grand Prairie, TX 75050
Phone: 269-388-7313 Phone: 214-235-0367
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
1/08/2025 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT JENNY CROSBY AT (817) 748-8195.
1) Correct the data summary to include number of stories and max. height of each building (Lots
1R1 & 1R2).
Informational Comments:
* The following variances to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, were approved with the
original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southlake Office Plaza (ZA13-106) and with
Chapel Crossing (ZA19-0064). These will be carried over as variances with the current request:
• Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on local and collector streets. A variance
was requested to allow a commercial driveway onto Countryside Ct., which is a local
street. (Please note that Countryside Ct. serves primarily non-residential traffic).
• Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100’ for both driveways. A variance
was requested to allow the stacking depths as shown on the Site Plan and Concept
Plans with approximately 43’ of stacking depth shown on the E. S.H. 114 driveway and
approximately 48’ of stacking depth shown on the Countryside Ct. driveway.
* Prior to issuance of a building permit, a Site Plan meeting the requirements of Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 40, must be approved by City Council following a
recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Site Plan must include existing
and proposed development and it must comply with the underlying zoning and the approved
Concept Plan.
* Only one trash receptacle enclosure is shown on the plan. Both lots will share the existing
trash receptacle enclosure on the proposed Lot 1R1. A shared use and maintenance
agreement must be in place prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed
building on Lot 1R2.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is not consistent with the previously approved Tree
Conservation Plan, Case ZA19-0064. If the development were proposed as traditional zoning
the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was is sued shall be used
to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved.
Previously all the existing trees on the property were shown to be preserved and included
within the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Calculations. There was 7.13% of existing tree
cover on both properties and a minimum of 70% was required to be preserved. A total of
46.59% was approved to be removed and 53.41% to be preserved.
Now, there is 9.41% of existing tree cover on the property proposed for development and
100% is proposed to be removed.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 3
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Label all bufferyards on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 4
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The minimum radius along the fire lane shall be 30’.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE:
2. The I value used shall follow the most current version of the ISWM manual. The current
version shows an I value for a Tc of 10 minutes as 9.76 in/hr.
* The capacity of the existing detention pond and storm pipes will need to be verified to
ensure there is adequate capacity during construction plan review.
UTILITY
3. The proposed sanitary sewer line from the existing manhole to, at a minimum, the
property line shall be a public line and will be required to be located within the existing
easements or within a new easement.
* Verify that a 4” water meter is necessary. The impact fees for a 4” meter are substantially
different than that for a 2” meter. Also, please be aware that dual meters are not
permitted, so if a 4” meter is required then 2- 2” meters cannot be used.
* Ensure that the water line, fire hydrants, and water meters are located within a water
easement for the commercial development.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 5
Fire Department Review
Lorenzo Chavez
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: lchavez@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If
the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault.
Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of
6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Not indicated on the plan)
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant,
and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (Not indicated)
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius.
(Radii throughout the plan do not meet the minimum requirement)
Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able
to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Complete fire lane
and tie-in to existing fire lane not indicated on plan)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely
sprinkled buildings. (Hydrants indicated are over spaced)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0073 Page 6
General Informational Comments
* Approval of a Site Plan by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for the new building. The
proposed zoning requires that the elevations for the second building be consistent with the
Phase I building, including the stone treatments.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* Building permit(s) are required prior to commencement of any work.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,
Roadway Imapct Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* All conditions of this current zoning approval continue with any future requests related to the
property, unless specifically approved otherwise by the City Council.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0073 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Eleven (11)
Responses Received: None (0)
SPO #Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1 COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH SP1 250 COUNTRYSIDE CT 3.679699684 NR
2 DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 1451 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.651274144 NR
3 DJC REALTY GROUP LLC SP1 101 COUNTRYSIDE CT 0.58421601 NR
4 121 COUNTRYSIDE COURT PROPERTI SP1 121 COUNTRYSIDE CT 0.190392154 NR
5 TEW INVESTMENTS LLC SP1 141 COUNTRYSIDE CT 0.422179362 NR
6 J & A FRITH PROPERTIES COUNTRY SP1 201 COUNTRYSIDE CT 0.314238717 NR
7 COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH SP1 251 COUNTRYSIDE CT 0.477868561 NR
8 ADELKI LLC SP1 1360 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.511877467 NR
9 BENGTSON PROPERTIES LLP SP1 1340 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.391946511 NR
10 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 301 W SH 114 2.750438516 NR
11 CONDREY LAND LLC SP1 1330 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.783919779 NR
1000 CHAPEL OWNER LP SP2 245 W SH 114 4.522088179
1001 CHAPEL CROSSING MEDICAL LTD SP2 275 W SH 114 1.72971772
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-667BA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R1 AND LOT 1R2 , BLOCK A,
RAVENAUX VILLAGE, AN ADDITION TO CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 6.209 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-P-2”
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO “S-P-2”
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”,
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use
of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes,
and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-2”
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 2
Generalized Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pe destrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect
of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and
off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to
control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air;
effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropri ate use of the
land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably inv ade the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 3
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which
existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and a ir,
prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates
the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there
is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that
there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximit y
to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were
originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for
the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called fo r, and are in the best interest of the public at
large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety
and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be alt ered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Lot 1R1 and Lot 1R2 , Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition
to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 6.14 acres,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 4
and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-2” Generalized
Site Plan District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District as depicted on the
approved Site Plan and Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 5
Previously Approved
Narrative letter and S-P-2 Regulations for Ord. No. 480-667
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 7
Planning and Zoning Commission motion on July 17, 2014:
July 17, 2014; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated July 11, 2014,
subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 11, 2014, specifically
approving the variances requested in the staff report dated July 11, 2014, and
specifically noting the approval of Option “A” with the motion and the
disallowance of Option “B” with the motion, also noting the applicant’s
willingness to work with the City as far as the timing and the installation of the
deceleration lane onto Countryside Ct. up to City standards and further noting
the applicant’s willingness to work with the City as far timing and what would
be required for a left turn lane on northbound White Chapel Blvd., referring to
striping and asphalt as staff has presented it.
City Council motion at 1st reading on August 19, 2014:
Approved at 1st reading (6-1) pursuant to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated August 13, 2014, noting the following comments with the motion; the
applicant will revise the elevations consistent with Council’s comments and
provide possible alternatives for building elevations noting that there will not
be any articulation variances included therein, noting that a revised site plan
will be considered that will include less impervious coverage, noting that the
carports as noted on the site plan to be twenty will be redesigned as such to
be incorporated possibly into the building design to reduce their visual impact
from White Chapel Blvd. and to be fewer in number, noting that it will be the
responsibility of the applicant to provide escrow funds for a deceleration lane
and work with staff to come up with a development plan to construct same in
connection with the White Chapel widening project, noting that the applicant
will provide right of way frontage for the White Chapel widening project, noting
that the revised site plan will include alternative vehicular access through the
project from Countryside Ct. along the western boundary to 114, noting that
the applicant will work with Council members to include a revised landscaping
plan, noting that more detail and scope and hardscape alternatives which
could also include water features to be included on the hard corner of White
Chapel and 114, approving the driveway stacking variance and also the
driveway on a local street, and incorporating Planning and Zoning’s
comments from the prior motion and recommendation to Council.
City Council motion at 2nd reading on October 7, 2014:
October 7, 2014; Approved at 2nd reading (7-0) subject to the following:
• Subject to the Staff Report dated September 30, 2014;
• Accepting staff’s recommendation on the traffic plan located along White
Chapel Boulevard as noted;
• Subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated
September 29, 2014;
• Approving two variances:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 8
1. Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on local and collector
streets. A variance is requested to allow a commercial driveway
onto Countryside Court, which is a local street. (Please note that
Countryside Court serves primarily non-residential traffic).
2. Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100 feet for
both driveways. A variance is requested to allow the stacking
depths as shown on the Site Plan and Concept Plans with
approximately 43 feet of stacking depth shown on the East S.H. 114
driveway and approximately 48 feet of stacking depth shown on the
Countryside Court driveway.
• Regarding building elevations:
1. South elevation will mirror the north elevation in terms of the
masonry column feature which is carried to the top of the parapet
wall.
2. West and east elevations to have the stone applied to top of the
third floor windows with a similar limestone capping material which
is consistent with the treatment on the other elevations and noting
the stone application material will not be carried on t he stairwells
and will remain as shown in the applicant’s presentation to Council
tonight.
3. North and south elevations will have consistent stone applications
as shown on the east side of the north and south elevations.
• Applicant will provide for seasonal color plantings in the signage area
featured at the corner of SH114 and White Chapel Boulevard;
• Requiring trees along SH114 and White Chapel Boulevard to be a
minimum of four-caliper inches;
• Subject to the elevations and materials, and landscape plan as presented
to Council this evening; and,
• In terms of the Phase II, 23,000 square foot expansion, requiring the
elevations to be consistent with what was presented to Council this
evening including the stone treatments provided earlier in the motion.
Reserved for Ord. No. 480-667A conditions of approval
Reserved for Ord. No. 480-667B conditions of approval
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 9
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratifie d, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respec t to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct con flict with the provisions
of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 10
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the
balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Eac h day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordi nance; and, as
to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in
court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as
required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 11
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 12
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ______, 2019.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ______day of ________, 2019.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 13
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as Lot 1R1 and Lot 1R2, Block A, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded as Instrument No. ________, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 6.14 acres.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 14
EXHIBIT “B”
Concept Plan for Ord. No. 480-667 submitted September 29, 2014
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 15
Site Plan for Ord. No. 480-667 submitted September 29, 2014
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 16
Site Data Table for Ord. No. 480-667 submitted September 29, 2014
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 17
Color Rendering for Ord. No. 480-667 presented at October 7, 2014 Council meeting
(See City Council 2nd reading motion for required revisions)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 18
Color Rendering for Ord. No. 480-667 presented at October 7, 2014 Council meeting
(See City Council 2nd reading motion for required revisions)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 19
Color Rendering for Ord. No. 480-667 presented at October 7, 2014 Council meeting
(See City Council 2nd reading motion for required revisions)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 20
Landscape Plan for Ord. No. 480-667 presented at October 7, 2014 Council meeting
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 21
Tree Conservation Plan for Ord. No. 480-667 presented at October 7, 2014 Council meeting
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0073 Page 22
Reserved for Ord. No. 667a Concept Plan
Reserved for Ord. No. 667b Concept Plan