2001-07-16
1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
2 PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING
3
4 July 16, 2001
5
6 MINUTES
7
8 Board Members Present: Chris Miltenberger, Chairman; Cara White, Vice-Chair; Mary
9 Georgia, Secretary; Frank Cornish, Bobby Rawls, Lisa Stokdyk and Tim O'Connor
10
11 Board Members Absent: Vice Chair Cara White
12
13 Staff Members Present: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services, and Steve
14 Polasek, Deputy Director of Community Services.
15
16 Regular Session:
17
18 Agenda Item No. 1. Call to Order
19
20 The meeting was called to order by Chair Chris Miltenberger at 7:00 p.m.
21
22 Agenda Item No. 2, Administrative Comments
23
24 Staff provided the Park Board with updates on the following topics:
25
26 Fire Damage to Concession/Restroom Building and Playground Equipment at
27 Bob Jones Park: Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman told the Board
28 that a fire occurred either late Saturday (July 15) night or early Sunday morning at
29 Bob Jones Park, almost completely destroying the concession stand/restroom
30 building. Fire gutted the concession/restroom side of the building, but the storage
31 side of the building was not affected. DPS is currently investigating the cause of
32 the fire and arson is suspected. There was no electricity to the building, which
33 ruled out an electrical cause of the blaze. In addition to the fire, the playground
34 equipment at Bob Jones Park was also vandalized.
35
36 The construction company has been notified. Since the building had yet to be
37 accepted by the City at the time of the fire, the City will pursue a claim against the
38 contractor's insurance company.Mr. Hugman said that the damaged section of the
39 building would probably be demolished completely and rebuilt.
40
41 Irrigation Plan and Audit of Fields at Bicentennial Park: Deputy Director of
42 Community Services said a lot of progress has been made on the irrigation system
43 at Bicentennial Park during the past few months. Preliminary information has
44 been given to the auditor and the irrigation audit should begin this week. Once
45 the audit is complete, additional modifications and repairs will be identified and
46 made to the systems. The audit will also reveal whether the other well needs to be
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 1 of 7
1 tapped. The water gauge shows that the current well water level is three-fourths
2 full, which is much better than the level last year at this time.
3
4 The watering cycles for ball fields 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 are on timers, with fields 6,
5 7, 8 and 9 being watered manually. The timer clocks have been reset and those
6 fields not on timers will be put on timers very soon. Once the baseball season has
7 finished, the fields will be aerated, fertilized and heavily watered.
8
9 Two areas to be addressed for irrigational needs at Bicentennial Park are the fence
10 line section adjacent to the homes and the section known as "the hill." The hill
11 area has been irrigated by the drip method in the past.
12
13 One goal of city personnel, along with the audit, is to bring all the irrigation
14 systems up to the standard they should be and to plan for future expansion of the
15 systems. The irrigation expansion plans will include the portion of Bicentennial
16 Park west of the creek, formerly owned by Ralph Evans, should it ever be
17 developed.
18
19 Mr. Polasek explained that funding for irrigation improvements is allocated from
20 the Coke Fund. The City recently received $25,000 from Coca Cola, $5,000 of
21 which will go toward promotion expenses, leaving $20,000 for the irrigation fund.
22
23 Staff commented about rehabilitation of the fields saying there is less of a gap
24 between playing seasons, which affects the ability of the fields to recover.
25
26 Chairman Miltenberger suggested having the one or two remaining teams this
27 season play on just one of the fields to allow for more extensive soaking of the
28 other field. Mr. Polasek suggested rotating the use of the fields.
29
30 Due to the location of the tape recorder during this meeting, some of the Board
31 members' comments could not be clearly heard at this time.
32
33 Ms. Stokdyk commented on the effect the drought had on the pine trees and asked
34 if they were going to be replaced by other pine trees? Staff has not looked at
35 replacing them with other pine trees, but the trees may be replaced with other
36 trees as the opportunity arises, perhaps from the Tree Farms or tree transplants.
37
38 There were no further Administrative Comments.
39
40 CONSENT AGENDA
41
42 Agenda Item No. 3-A, Approval of the Southlake Parks and Recreation Board meeting
43 minutes of July 9, 2001.
44
45 A motion was made to approve the minutes of the July 9, 2001 Parks and Recreation
46 Board meeting.
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 2 of 7
I Motion: Georgia
2 Second: Rawls
3 Ayes: Cornish, Georgia, O'Connor, and Rawls
4 Nays: None
5 Abstention: Stokdyk, Miltenberger
6 Vote: 4-0-2
7
8 Motion carried.
9
10 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CONSENT ITEMS
11
12 Agenda Item No. 3-A, Approval of the Southlake Parks and Recreation Board meeting
13 minutes of July 9, 2001. Approved as presented.
14
15 REGULAR AGENDA
16
17 Agenda Item No. 4, Public Forum
18
19 Chairman Miltenberger asked if anyone present would like to speak during the Public
20 Forum. No one spoke at this time; the Public Forum was closed.
21
22 Agenda Item No. 5-A, Application for Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPW) Indoor
23 Recreation grant funding for proposed recreation center.
24
25 Mr. Hugman began consideration of this item by stating that staff was seeking the
26 Board's recommendation to present to City Council. Mr. Hugman brought the Board up-
27 to-date on developments, stating that staff met with the Parks Board on June 11, 2001 to
28 discuss the necessary components of a recreation center, gather input, and forwarded the
29 Park Board's list to the architect as directed. Based upon the budget, the architect drafted
30 the concept plan as presented in the packet and attached to these minutes.
31
32 Mr. Hugman said staff requested that the architect incorporate a water feature, as
33 discussed at the previous Park Board meeting, into the concept plan if it was not cost-
34 prohibited; however, they were unable to do so, due to the monetary constraints.
35
36 Deputy Director Steve Polasek briefly reviewed the concept plan, stating that the final
37 design or layout of the concept plan may look totally different than the one presented, but
38 components would remain the same.
39
40 Mr. Polasek highlighted some of the information found in the "Southlake Recreation
41 Center Preliminary Program Areas - July 11, 2001" chart:
42
43 Approx. 36-36,500 sq. ft. building
44 Construction Cost @ $5.6 million
45 $4.3 million for the building
46 $360,000 for furniture, fixtures, game room equipment, elevators, a/c units, etc.
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 3 of 7
1 $410,100 site construction costs
2 10% Contingency of $514,000 due to the length of the project to be bid
3
4 Mr. Polasek commented about the square footage allocated for each component use as
5 outlined on the chart.
6
7 Mr. Miltenberger asked if staff knew the square footage of the aerobics room at
8 the Solana complex. Staff did not.
9
10 Mr. Polasek reviewed the draft site plan with the Board. The architect recommended
11 saving the clump of trees by moving the library to the location noted on the plan.
12
13 Mr. Hugman explained to the Board the site plan was designed based on the prior City
14 Council's direction that Parkwood Drive would not connect all the way to FM 1709, and
15 based on the neighborhood input received at a meeting.
16
17 Mr. Polasek directed the Board's attention to the floor plan, pointing out that one unique
18 feature was that the entrance into the building is on Level Two since the topography
19 slopes toward Byron Nelson Parkway. He stressed again that the floor plan is only a
20 preliminary layout and that the final design has not been determined.
21
22 Mr. Rawls asked about expansion of the building and whether another gymnasium
23 could be added at a later date? Mr. Polasek responded that any expansion would
24 have to be done on the south side of the building.
25
26 Another unique feature pointed out by Mr. Polasek was that the climbing wall would be
27 visible to drive-by traffic through a glass wall.
28
29 Ms. Stokdyk asked how the climbing wall would be supervised? Mr. Polasek
30 responded the climbing wall room would be blocked off and users would have to
31 ask for permission from the control desk personnel. Supervison would mainly be
32 handled through the program classes. The wall would be a programmed use just
33 like the other rooms. The harnesses and equipment would be "checked out" and a
34 "pass" given to the user. Users would be identified and meet criteria before being
35 allowed access.
36
37 Mr. Miltenberger had concerns about access to the climbing wall as well and said
38 he believed the Board had talked about having a staff member at the wall all of
39 the time. Mr. Polasek said a use policy would be developed and the climbing wall
40 would not be handled like an open gym.
41
42 Ms. Stokdyk shared her opinion further about the climbing wall saying that some
43 of the plans she had viewed of other recreation centers, such as the Arlington
44 center, showed the climbing wall as a feature located in so-called wasted space.
45 Her concern was that this floor plan showed it as an additional area that looked as
46 though it had been added to the building just to accommodate the climbing wall,
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 4 of 7
I which some people feel is just a fad. She asked how that space would be used in
2 the event the climbing wall is no longer needed? Mr. Polasek responded that it
3 could be used for a storage area. The climbing wall area is about 200 square feet.
4
5 Mr. Miltenberger asked which rec center components the Board had listed at the meeting
6 were not included in this concept plan?
7
8 Ms. Georgia said she did not see a youth activities/teen center area for 15-18 year
9 olds on the plan. Mr. Polasek said that the gameroom could accommodate that use
10 and could be outfitted with a big screen television, pool table, seating, etc., to
11 serve the youth.
12
13 Mr. Miltenberger mentioned having a separate entrance into the room for the
14 teenagers. He recalled that the thought from the teens that were surveyed, was that
15 the teens go one way and adults go another. Mr. Polasek said that could be
16 accomplished, but as far as a separate entrance into the building, that was not
17 feasible.
18
19 Ms. Stokdyk asked these questions: Has there been a determination that if the City has a
20 contract with the YMCA to run the rec facilities, would Community Services be housed
21 there? Would Community Services be somewhere else? Have not all the rec centers had
22 membership fees, ie., country club or health club?
23
24 Regarding Ms. Stokdyk's membership question, Mr. Polasek said Coppell has a
25 fee of about $40 a month for families, Hurst has a fee of $25 per year per person
26 for residents and the Grapevine fee is $15-20 a month per family. He didn't know
27 about the Arlington fee schedule. According to the survey taken in Southlake, the
28 fee amount people in Southlake are willing to pay is about $20 per month.
29
30 Mr. Polasek addressed Ms. Stokdyk's question about the future location of the
31 Community Services Department saying that Community Services would still
32 operate. Community Services is currently out of space and will continue to grow.
33 He said his assumption has been that Community Services would be included in
34 the recreation center.
35
36 The recreation center floor plan does show office space for center staff.
37
38 Ms. Stokdyk raised the question about including a water feature in the recreation center
39 saying she thought the Park Board was going to see cost estimates and design drafts for
40 adding a water feature to the concept plan? She didn't see any cost estimates or designs in
41 their packet and asked why it was omitted? She asked if the City does receive the
42 $750,000 from Texas Parks and Wildlife grant, would that cover the cost of a water
43 feature?
44
45 Mr. Polasek responded the numbers [costs] were not even close so that a water
46 feature could be considered in the design of this concept plan. He reminded
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 5 of 7
I members that at the last meeting where recreation center components were
2 discussed, staff was directed to only include a water feature as an alternate, if
3 funding was available. He said it could not even be considered as an alternate
4 since the money was not available. He said the floor space was cramped just to
5 get all of the features the Park Board listed into the 36,000 square foot building.
6
7 Ms. Stokdyk presented her rationale in pushing for a water feature in the rec
8 center. She said she believed the demographics support the need and feels it is
9 short-sighted not to include some sort of water feature in the center. She said a
10 water feature is multi-generational, and is not discriminatory for ages, for
11 handicapped, for physically abled. She added that she was disappointed that the
12 packet did not include cost estimates to compare and make a decision.
13
14 Ms. Georgia presented her argument against putting a pool in the recreation center
15 and referenced the joint use with the CISD for the natatorium to fill the
16 recreational water needs of the community. She said a true "teen center" has not
17 even been allocated in the rec center design and she believes that was a much
18 bigger need than a pool.
19
20 Ms. Stokdyk reiterated her arguments for a water feature and said that it does
21 drive membership and would not go unused.
22
23 Mr. Rawls related that rankings listed on the chart showed a water feature was
24 ranked as number twelve on the list. He mentioned all the water activities that will
25 be available in the natatorium and the uses it will address in the community.
26
27 Members and staff commented about other issues related to the recreation center during
28 their discussion. They talked about water features, the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant,
29 how a water feature could possibly be added to the center in the future, staff requirements
30 for a water feature, population distribution in Southlake and the developments of more
31 subdivisions with pools verses individual home sites, accommodating youth activities and
32 pros and cons of a separate entrances for the youth, and the flexibility of the site, layout
33 of the rec centers recently toured by the Park Board, and the length of the proposed
34 jogging track.
35
36 Addressing the recreation center site plan, Mr. Miltenberger said he had concerns that the
37 design did not lend itself to future expansion for a second gymnasium, a second teen
38 place, an outdoor or indoor pool, and expansion of the youth activity area.
39
40 Mr. Polasek said this site plan was designed for the purpose of the TPW grant
41 application. He said the points made by Park Board members were very constructive and
42 suggested that during the design process, they would have the architect denote areas
43 where future expansion could be added.
44
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 6 of 7
1 Recreation center components can be added to the plan, but features can not be deleted
2 once the grant is obtained, since the grant is given based on the features presented in the
3 master plan.
4
5 Ms. Georgia suggested that the concept plan show a "youth activity/teen gameroom" on
6 the list, since that was a key factor in starting the push to have a recreation center and it
7 should be addressed when the plan goes to city council.
8
9 A motion was made to move forward to present this to City Council as a
10 recommendation of the Park Board as presented in 5A handout.
11 Motion: Georgia
12 Second: Cornish
13 Ayes: Cornish, Georgia, Miltenberger, O'Connor, and Rawls
14 Nays: Stokdyk
15 Abstention: None
16 Vote: 5-1
17
18 Motion carried.
19
20 Ms. Stokdyk noted for the record that she chose to dissent on the vote since there were
21 not any cost or design estimates for a water feature for the Board to consider.
22
23 Agenda Item No. 7, Adjournment
24
25 The Board voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting.
26
27
28 /
29
30 Chls Miltenberg
31 Parks & Recreation oard Chair
32
33
34 -TvIary Georgia ~3/o I
35 Secretary
36
37
38 NAParks & Recreation\BOARDS\PKBOARD\MINUTES\2001\071601.doc
July 16, 2001 Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Page 7 of 7
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
July 12, 2001
TO: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services
FROM: Chris Carpenter, Senior Parks Planner
SUBJECT: Recommendation of Resolution No. 01-051, Authorizing Application for a
Texas Recreation and Parks Account Program (TRPA) Indoor Recreation
Grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
Action Requested: Recommendation to City Council for authorization to submit a Texas
Recreation and Parks Account Program (TRPA) Indoor Recreation Grant to
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).
Background
Information: At the regular City Council meeting on June 5, 2001, the Council gave staff
direction to limit the scope of services with Brinkley Sargent Architects to
that of providing the necessary drawings (schematic site plan and floor
plan) and documentation (preliminary floor space and cost estimates) for
submission of a grant application in an amount up to $750,000 to TPWD
for the proposed Southlake Recreation Center.
Brinkley Sargent was able to recently provide these instruments to staff for
Park Board, SPDC and Council review prior to the application deadline of
July 31, 2001, and they are enclosed with this memo. Please note that the
conceptual facility floor plan and cost estimates are for a 36,455 square foot
facility at an estimated $5,659,089 (including 10% contingency)
construction cost.
Financial
Considerations: The revised scope of services with Brinkley Sargent architects for the grant
application documents is for $11,000, to be counted against any future
balance for full professional design services, which are generally in the
10% range of the total construction costs. SPDC and City Council have
previously approved a Recreation Center construction budget of $5,700,000
($700,000 in FY 01-02, $5,000,000 in FY 02-03). The City is currently
pursuing a matching funds grant from TPWD in amount up to $750,000.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: At their June 11, 2001 meeting, the Parks Board discussed with staff the
components of a recreation center and their priorities. The SPDC will
consider this item prior to the City Council meeting on July 17, 2001.
Legal Review: Not Applicable.
Kevin Hugman, Director of Parks and Recreation
July 12, 2001
Page 2
Alternatives: Park Board review and input.
Supporting
Documents: Supporting documents include the following:
■ Resolution No. 01-051, Authorizing Application for a Texas Recreation
and Parks Account Program (TRPA) Indoor Recreation Grant from the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
■ Schematic site plan and floor plans for proposed Recreation Center
■ Preliminary floor space program and budget for proposed Recreation
Center
Staff
Recommendation: Parks Board recommendation to City Council for authorization to submit a
Texas Recreation and Parks Account Program (TRPA) Indoor Recreation
Grant to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).
5 A-'~,
Kevin Hugman, Director of Parks and Recreation
July 12, 2001
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-051
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION
TEXAS RECREATION AND PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM (TRPA)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS
"APPLICANT," DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR,
ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE "APPLICANT" IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS
PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE
"DEPARTMENT," FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TEXAS RECREATION &
PARKS ACCOUNT GRANT PROGRAM, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE
"PROGRAM;" CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE
PROGRAM ASSISTANCE; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" MATCHING SHARE IS
READILY AVAILABLE; AND DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR PERMANENT
PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATIONAL USES.
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has approved the "Program" (Section 24 of the Parks & Wildlife Code
for the purpose of allowing the political subdivisions of the State of Texas to participate in the Program; and
WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is fully eligible to receive assistance under the "Program"; and
WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is desirous of authorizing an official to represent and act for the "Applicant" in
dealing with the "Department" concerning the "Program";
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE "APPLICANT":
SECTION 1: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that they are eligible to receive assistance under the
"Program".
SECTION 2: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that the matching share for this application is readily
available at this time.
SECTION 3: That the "Applicant" hereby authorizes and directs its Director of Community Services to act
for the Applicant in dealing with the "Department" for the purpose of the "Program", and Kevin Hugman,
Director of Community Services is hereby officially designated as the representative in this regard.
SECTION 4: The "Applicant" hereby specifically authorizes the official to make application to the
"Department" concerning the site to be known as The City of Southlake Recreation Center in the City of
Southlake for use as a park site. That the City of Southlake Recreation Center is hereby dedicated (or will be
dedicated upon completion of the proposed acquisition) for public park and recreation purposes in
perpetuity.
Introduced, read and passed by the affirmation vote of the "Applicant" on this day of July, 2001.
Signature of Authorized Official
Name and Title
Attest
J A -'J
SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM
July 11, II
Number of
Area Name Staff Size Unit Area spaces Area
Lobby
Waiting 500
Toilets 130 2 260
Control/Checkout Desk 2 10x12 120 1 120
Storage Room l Ox 12 120 1 120
Office 1 lOx 13 130 1 130
Staff Desks 2 6x 10 60 2 120
Work/Copy 6x9 54 1 54
Net Area 1,304
25% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/75)*25 435
Gross area of this Activity 1,739
Community Services Offices
Director Office 1 12X18 216 1 216
Admin. Sec 10x10 100 1 100
Waiting 10x20 200 1 200
Conference (10) 12X16 192 1 192
Work/Copy l Ox 10 100 1 100
Break(6)/lockers(12) 15X15 225 1 225
Work Room(5 Stations) 480 1 480
Storage Room 150 1 150
Recreation Staff 12X16 192 5 960
Net Area 2,623
20% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/80)*20 656
Gross area of this Activity 3,279
Toilets/Lockers
Toilets/Lockers 1,200
Family Changing 8x 10 80 2 160
Net Area 1,360
25% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/75)*25 453
Gross area of this Activity 1,813
Gameroom
Gameroom 34x46 1564 1 1,564
Vending 13x26 338 1 338
Net Area 1,902
15% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/85)* 15 336
Gross area of this Activity 1,902
Gym
Basketball Courts (2) 10000 1 10,000
Seating 6x53 159 2 318
Storage 15x25 375 1 375
Net Area 10,693
10% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/90)*10 1,188
Gross area of this Activity 11,881
96013\P2\SQFT8-29.xls 5 1 7 -
PRELIMINARY SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
PROGRAM AREAS
July 11, II
Number of
Area Name Staff Size Unit Area spaces Area
Walking/Running Track 10x400 4000 1 4,000
Stretching Area 9x58 522 1 522
Net Area 4,522
10% Circulation of Gross Area (NET/90)* 10 502
Gross area of this Activity 5,024
Other Activity Areas
Aerobics Room (24) 1700 1 1,700
Storage room 20x10 200 1 200
Cardiovascular/Weights 3500 1 3,500
Meeting Room (100) 15 100 1,500
Divider Wall 25 2 50
Storage Alcove 8x12 96 1 96
Kitchenette 5x12 60 1 60
Climbing Wall 200 1 200
Toilets (singles) 6x9 54 2 108
Net Area 7,414
20 % Circulation of Gross Area (NET/80)*20 1,854
Gross area of this Activity 9,268
Other Areas
Baby-sitting/Toddler Waiting 2502 800 1 800
Storage Room 7x8 56 1 56
Toilet (child size) 5x8 40 1 40
Net Area 896
20 % Circulation of Gross Area (NET/80)*20 224
Gross area of this Activity 1,120
Building Support
Janitor Closet 9x13 117 1 117
Mechanical 10x10 100 1 100
Electrical 9x12 108 1 108
Phone / Data 5x8 40 1 40
Net Area 365
15 % Circulation of Gross Area (NET/85)* 15 64
Gross area of this Activity 429
TOTAL BUILDING 36,455
96013\P2\SQFT8-29.xls 1 V
SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
PPRELIMINARY PROG RANI AREAS
'July 11, 2001
Building Construction Costs S.F.
Recreation Center 36,455 $4,374,626
Sub Total Building Construction Costs $4,374,626
Furnishings & Equipment
Unique Spaces
Game Room $10,000
Office FF&E $110,000
General Equipment $240,000
Subtotal $360,000
Site Construction Costs (parking lot, landscaping, utilities, walks)
Parking and paving $180,000
Landscape $80,000
Utilities $150,000
Subtotal $410,000
Sub Total Estimated Project Costs: $5,144,626
Contingency $514,463
Bidding, Construction & Inflation 10%
Total Construction Costs: $5,659,089
Note: Cost Based on a March 2002 Bid Date
96013\P2\SQ FT8-29.x16
5R-
~a
a~
(D C!~~ F,
w
W I
ro
r -n
01
_ I
r_C N
y d ~ a
n n N
~01
i ~
7~ S N
Y
_fD p W n w -
C
O
ro o o (D a y~J
o r* °o
ova 3
'D n
CD ° R
z
T 3
N vro C y
(D ~ a
Y
Cu
;r CD I ~
00
SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
Scale: I"= 50' A,,') July 12, 2001 BRINKLEY SARGENT ARCHITECTS
fo AW441
i
i
i
s\ _
o O
r
_ oa m r-
o
ro
N
n I
n
(D
r
T_ rD
o <
O (p
I
SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
Scale: V= 50' A,,'k) July 12, 2001 BRINKLEY SARGENT ARCHITECTS
S m-%
e i i
O
10
rW
(D
4 00 ° V D
_r ~ I
o IJ ~ ~ ►
- .
o
~ ~~J L I
a -LJ~ ~I- (44
nA
m m
ro ro
0 ► 0
I
j sz
Byron Nelson Parkway
II -
r
~ I
~I
i
I
SOUTHLAKE RECREATION CENTER
Scale: 1" = 50' ) July-12,2001 BRINKLEY SARGENT ARCHITECTS
5F% -°1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PROJECT RANKINGS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECTS
Project Description Park Board CIP
7/9/01 Committee
Girls Softball Complex T1 T4
Noble Oaks Park Development T1 T7
Koalaty Park Development T2 T7
Royal & Annie Smith Park Development T2 T4
Bob Jones Park Development 3 1
Recreation Center T4 3
Recreation Center Site Development T4 5
Bicentennial Landscaping Improvements 5 T13
In-Line Hockey Rink T6 T14
Ongoing Trail Implementation T6 2
Bicentennial Baseball Field Realignment T7 9
Parks Maintenance Facility T7 T7
Lacrosse Facility T8 T14
Lonesome Dove Playground Replacement T8 12
Sand Volleyball Court T8 T11
Timarron/Richards Pond Enhancement 9 T8
Nature Center Improvements T10 10
New Community Park T10 T11
Farhat Property Improvements 11 15
BMX Facility T12 17
Community Building Removal T12 T11
Entry Portals T12 T4
Family Leisure Aquatics Center T12 T8
Sheltonwood Park Development T12 6
Equestrian Facility T13 T13
Skate Park T13 16
In-Line Hockey Rink Covering 14 19
Working Farm 15 18
07113101 Page I of I
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION
TEXAS RECREATION AND PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM (TRPA)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS "APPLICANT," DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS
BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE
"APPLICANT" IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE
DEPARTMENT, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "DEPARTMENT,"
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TEXAS RECREATION &
PARKS ACCOUNT GRANT PROGRAM, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS
THE "PROGRAM;" CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" IS ELIGIBLE
TO RECEIVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE; CERTIFYING THAT THE
"APPLICANT" MATCHING SHARE IS READILY AVAILABLE; AND
DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR PERMANENT PUBLIC PARK AND
RECREATIONAL USES.
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has approved the "Program" (Section 24 of the Parks
& Wildlife Code for the purpose of allowing the political subdivisions of the State of
Texas to participate in the Program; and
WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is fully eligible to receive assistance under the "Program";
and
WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is desirous of authorizing an official to represent and act
for the "Applicant" in dealing with the "Department" concerning the "Program";
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE "APPLICANT":
SECTION 1: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that they are eligible to receive
assistance under the "Program".
SECTION 2: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that the matching share for this
application is readily available at this time.
SECTION 3: That the "Applicant" hereby authorizes and directs its Director of
Community Services to act for the Applicant in dealing with the "Department" for the
purpose of the "Program", and the Director of Community Services is hereby officially
designated as the representative in this regard.
SECTION 4: The "Applicant" hereby specifically authorizes the official to make
application to the "Department" concerning the site to be known as The City of Southlake
Recreation Center in the City of Southlake for use as a park site. That the City of
Southlake Recreation Center is hereby dedicated (or will be dedicated upon completion
of the proposed acquisition) for public park and recreation purposes in perpetuity.
Introduced, read and passed by the affirmation vote of the "Applicant" on this 17th
day of July, 2001.
Signatur of Authorize icial +e tie~~0auo,,,,0
TE''~..
` 9
r e
Name and Title
= J • •
.
o
Attest