The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6 - Staff ReportCase No. ZA24-0051 S T A F F R E P O R T November 1, 2024 CASE NO: ZA24-0051 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan and Development Plan for Forefront Senior Living EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Dunaway Associates, on behalf of Forefront Living, are requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan and Development Plan for Forefront Senior Living on property described as Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parker’s Corner Addition, and Tract 2A02, J. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18, and located at 300-684 Davis Blvd., City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. Current Zoning: “RE” Residential Estate District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District. Proposed Zoning: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District and “TZD” Transition Zoning District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. DETAILS: The purpose of this request is to seek approval of an approximately 21-acre senior living (age 62+) community for up to 210 total residences, located along the west side of Davis Blvd. approximately 1200 feet south of the intersection of Davis Blvd. and W. Southlake Blvd. The community will provide multiple levels of living and care options as well as dining, fitness/wellness, and personal services for residents. The development will also establish a streamway buffer to preserve the natural features and trees along the western side of the property. The proposed development includes two zoning components: 1. “TZD” Transition Zoning District for 20 age-restricted single-family houses (“cottages”) and 2. “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to include independent living, assisted living, and memory care housing, as well as ancillary commercial uses for residents including dining, fitness/wellness, salons, and limited retail and services. Southlake does not have a zoning district that addresses all proposed uses of this senior living community, hence the request for both “TZD” and “S-P-1” zoning. The applicant intends to develop the entirety of the community at one time, and each of the two proposed zoning components is not feasible without the other. As such, both zoning components are proposed as one development case. Following the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on September 19, 2024, the applicant met with neighbors and reoriented and revised the “S-P-1” and “TZD” components in an effort to address concerns. These changes include • Shifting 0.13 acre from the S-P-1 component to the TZD component, Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA24-0051 including relocating 6 cottages to the southwest side of the site; • Reducing the height of a portion of the independent living building on the southwest side of the site and a portion of the east elevation near Davis Blvd., • Increasing the building footprint area, percentage of building coverage, gross floor area, impervious coverage, and independent living floor area in the S-P-1 component (with no changes to the number of units), • Decreasing the parking garage area and open space in the S-P-1 component, and • Increasing the open space in the TZD component. Revisions to the previous submittal are indicated in red in this report. Additional details about each zoning component are as follows. Transition Zoning District and Development Plan Request The TZD component of the project encompasses 10 acres with 20 age-restricted single family residential homes (“cottages”) within a private, gated subdivision. The center of the TZD includes an event lawn for social gatherings and events with a future pavilion. The proposed development regulations are as follows: Forefront Living Southlake (TZD) Number of Residential Units 20 Gross Acreage 10.0 ac 10.13 ac Density 2.0 du/acre Open Space Acreage 5.99 ac 6.34 ac TZD Development Regulations Minimum Lot Size 5500 sq ft Maximum Height 2 Stories / 35 ft Front Yard Setback 20 ft from Private Streets Side Yard Setback 5 ft Rear Yard Setback 10 ft Maximum Lot Coverage 60% Maximum Impervious Coverage 75% The applicant proposes the following modifications to the “TZD” District requirements: A. Section 47.4 (a): A Transition Zoning District shall consist of a minimum of two of the three following district components: a Retail Area, a Retail Edge/Neighborhood Edge, and a Neighborhood. The proposed TZD will only include a Neighborhood component. B. Section 47.7.d(3): The first floor elevation of single-family dwellings shall be raised a minimum of two (2) feet above the finished level of the public sidewalk/trail in front of the residential structures. The first floor Case No. ZA24-0051 elevation will be permitted to be at grade level to serve the age restricted population. C. A minimum of six feet of continuous planter strip width is required between the back of curb of the road and the sidewalk. The proposed TZD will not require planter strips between the curb and sidewalk. Trees will be planted within the front yards. S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District and Site Plan Request The S-P-1 component of the project encompasses 11.04 10.91 acres with an up to 4-story, 416,971 sq. ft. 492,000 building with independent living, assisted living, and memory support living units as well as 2 dog parks, outdoor recreational areas, and a below-grade parking garage. The living units will be luxury resort- style residences with amenities and services including dining venues, fitness, wellness, activity spaces, housekeeping, and salon services. The proposed permitted uses are as follows: • Independent Living • Assisted Living • Memory Assist • Dining Venues for Residents • Wellness, fitness center, and salons for Residents The Site Data Summary is as follows: Case No. ZA24-0051 Revised Submittal Original Submittal VARI ANCES REQUESTED: 1) A variance is requested from Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Sections 8.01 and 5.04 to allow lots in the TZD to front on a private access easement meeting minimum fire department requirements. 2) A variance is requested from Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requiring a minimum stacking depth of 150’ for the southern drive. Case No. ZA24-0051 ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 1, 2024 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-823 (TZD) (F) Ordinance No. 480-824 (S-P-1) SPIN Meeting Report Corridor Planning Committee Report PowerPoint Presentation Narrative (including TZD Regulations and S-P-1 Regulations) Plans STAFF CONTACT: Jenny Crosby (817) 748-8195 Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Case No. Attachment A ZA24-0051 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Gregory G. Kuelbs APPLICANT: Dunaway Associates on behalf of Forefront Living PROPERTY SITUATION: 300-684 Davis Blvd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lots 1A-3, Parker’s Corner Addition and Tract 2A02, J. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use and 100-Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE5” Residential Estate District PROPOSED ZONING: “TZD” Transitional Zoning District and “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District HISTORY: The properties were annexed into the City in 1957 with Ord. No. 78. A Final Plat (ZA85-036) was approved in December of 1981 for Lots 1-5, Parker’s Corner Addition. A residential construction permit was issued in May of 1985 for 300 Davis Blvd. A residential construction permit was issued in December of 1980 for 500 Davis Blvd. SOUTHLAKE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The future land use designation for the site is “Mixed Use” and “Floodplain”. Definition and Purpose: Mixed Use: To provide an option for large‐scale, master‐planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed-Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. 100-Year Floodplain: The Floodplain category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100‐year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept free of encroachment in order that the 100‐year flood may be carried without Case No. Attachment A ZA24-0051 Page 2 harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not in the floodway may be reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan Davis Blvd. is designated as 6-lane divided arterial (A6D) with 130’-140’ of ROW. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan This section of Davis Blvd. is designated to have a sidewalk less than 8’ in width. The Pathways Plan also calls for an 8’ multi-use trail on the western side of the property. Both the sidewalk along Davis and the trail are shown on the proposed Development/Site Plan. Site Specific Recommendations The Future Land Use Plan recommendations for the property are as follows: Case No. Attachment A ZA24-0051 Page 3 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed development has two entrances onto Davis Blvd. The southern driveway, which aligns with Sunset Way across Davis Blvd. (entrance for the Hidden Knoll neighborhood), will be the primary driveway for the development. The northern driveway, which aligns with Vista Ridge Dr. (entrance for the Ridgeview neighborhood), will be for emergency access only. Current TXDOT median plans indicate there will be a median break at Vista Ridge Dr. and no break at Sunset Way. Traffic Counts Davis Blvd. (48) (Between Continental and F.M. 1709) 24hr North Bound (15,000) South Bound (14,818) AM Peak (1319) 7:00 – 8:00 AM Peak (897) 11:30AM – 12:30PM PM Peak (1071) 5:15 – 6:15 PM Peak (1532) 4:45 – 5:45PM * Based on the (2017-2018) City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Case No. Attachment A ZA24-0051 Page 4 Traffic Impact Per the applicant’s Traffic Impact Analysis Threshold Worksheet, the anticipated site traffic for the proposed development is 686 vehicles on a daily basis. The anticipated AM peak hour site traffic is 42 vehicles per hour and the PM peak hour traffic is 53 vehicles per hour. TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D since the property is being rezoned. For the entire 21-acre development, there is 26% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A minimum of 71% is proposed to be preserved and a maximum of 29% is proposed to be removed. For the S-P-1 zoning component, there is 21% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A minimum of 56% is proposed to be preserved and a maximum of 44% is proposed to be removed. For the TZD zoning component, there is 32% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A minimum of 81% is proposed to be preserved and a maximum of 19% is proposed to be removed. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P- 2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Case No. Attachment A ZA24-0051 Page 5 UTILITIES: There is an existing 6” water line on the eastern boundary of the property along Davis Blvd. as well as a 12” water line on the eastern side of Davis Blvd. There is an existing 15” sanitary sewer line along the west boundary of the property. DRAINAGE: Underground detention is proposed. CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development: SPIN Meetings were held on February 28, 2023 and January 9, 2024. This item was heard by the Corridor Planning Committee on September 19, 2022 and October 23, 2023. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: September 19, 2024; A public hearing was held, then the item was tabled (6-0) and the public hearing continued to October 3, 2024 at the applicant’s request. October 3, 2024; Meeting cancelled. (All items moved to the October 17, 2024 meeting.) October 17, 2024; Tabled on consent (7-0) to November 7, 2024 at the applicant’s request. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 1, 2024. Case No. Attachment B ZA24-0051 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 1 SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA24-0051 Updated Review No.: Three Date of Review: 11/01/24 Project Name: Forefront Living Southlake APPLICANT: Stephen Cook, Dunaway Associates Phone: (817) 335-1121 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/25/24 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JENNY CROSBY AT (817) 748-8195. 1. If access other than standard conforming public street is proposed, for the TZD, provide a regulation for fire department establishing the minimum standards. This must meet the minimum fire department emergency access standards. A variance has been requested. Private streets are proposed that are 26 ft. in width and have a minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. 2. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended. Correct the stacking depth measurement for the southern drive. As the northern drive is proposed as emergency access only, a minimum of 150 feet of stacking is required. Stacking depth is measured from the R.O.W. to the nearest parking stall or intersecting drive lane pavement edge. If required stacking depth cannot be achieved, a variance may be requested. 3. Provide a minimum 8’ screening device meeting the requirements of Zoning Ordinance 480, Sections 33 and 39 along all boundaries abutting residential property. Alternative screening regulations are proposed. 4. Provide minimum living unit sizes for each residence type, minimum staffing for each residence type, and minimum amenities provided. Please list all proposed uses in the S-P-1 under the “Permitted Uses” in the narrative letter (include uses listed elsewhere in the narrative letter, such as pool, library, “limited retail and services” – please clarify what these will be) Informational Comments: • Please be aware that TxDOT plans installation of medians on Davis Blvd. Current plans show a median break at Vista Ridge Drive, in alignment with the emergency access (northern) drive for the proposed development. There is not a planned median break in alignment with the proposed southern drive. • Fire Dept. comments require a minimum separation between fire lane access points. The Fire Department has determined that the secondary emergency access driveway is sufficient to meet the remote distance requirement. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 2 • The 8’ multi-use trail shown on the western side of the property will need to be constructed with the development. • Consult with USPS regarding postal delivery. Consider accommodations for mail service as well as package delivery services. • Though the “TZD” Transition Zoning District allows for flexibility, the category does provide specific guidance for development. The following are notable applicable standards of the Transition Zoning District regulations found in Section 47.7 for which modifications are requested: o A Transition Zoning District shall consist of a minimum of two of the three following distinct components: a Retail Area, a Retail Edge/Neighborhood Edge, and a Neighborhood. The TZD portion of the application only includes a Neighborhood component. Modification requested. o The first floor elevation of single-family dwellings shall be raised a minimum of two (2) feet above the finished level of the public sidewalk/trail in front of the residential structures. Modification requested. o A minimum of six feet of continuous planter strip width is required between the back of curb of the road and the sidewalk. Modification requested. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 3 TREE CONSERVATION/LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. How did the total existing tree cover increase from 26% to 47% between two submittals? 2. The proposed grading and utilities do not conform to the proposed Tree Preservation. Grading is and construction are proposed within areas where trees are proposed to be preserved. Specifically on the north and south sides of the residential lots in the west portion of the development, and along the south property line where a retaining wall is proposed to be built. There is a storm drain and grading on the north end of the west residential lots, and an underground stormwater storage vault and grading proposed on the south end of the lots. The proposed retaining wall off the south property line will cut through the critical root zone area of the trees proposed to be preserved. 3. There is a tree protection note on the Tree Conservation Plan Preserved Tree Data Sheet that says, “No grade changes more than 3’ is allowed within the root protection zone.” No topography grade changes that will alter more than 25% of the critical root zone area of a protected tree is allowed. ALTER; ALTERS; ALTERATION: Any act which causes or may reasonably be expected to cause a tree to die, including but not limited to, any of the following: uprooting any portion of the tree’s root system; severing the main trunk of the tree; inflicting damage upon the tree’s root system by machinery, storage of materials, or the compaction of soil above the root system of a tree; changing the natural grade of the critical root zone of a tree or uphill from the critical root zone of the tree so as to divert the flow of water to or away from the critical root zone; applying herbicidal or other lethal chemicals to the tree or any portion of the critical root zone of the tree; placement of impermeable material over any portion of the critical root system of a tree; and trenching within the critical root zone. A protected tree shall be considered to be altered if one or more of the following occurs: more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the critical root zone is adversely affected, more than twenty-five percent (25%) of its canopy is removed, or the tree is disfigured to the extent a reasonable person would conclude the tree will not survive. 4. The proposed tree conservation complies with the existing tree cover preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E, but only by 1%. There is 47% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 50% is required to be preserved. A total of 51% is proposed to be preserved and 49% to be removed. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 4 Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 5 LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The minimum required Seasonal Color calculations within the Interior Landscape Summary Chart are incorrect. The minimum required Seasonal Color based on 2% of the building footprint area is 1,390 square feet. 2. There are two (2) parking landscape islands within the west parking that are less than the minimum required width of 12’ from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to- edge if no curb is intended and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 3. Along with the required canopy tree in each parking landscape island, each island is required to contain shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, or a combination of these plant materials. * Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for required landscaping within the south and east bufferyards but on the proposed Tree Removal Plan no existing trees are shown to be preserved within these areas. Please correct the bufferyards plant material calculations to reflect the existing tree preservation being proposed. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * The applicant is proposing to provide a Streamway Buffer and take streamway buffer credits for the west bufferyard as outline in Section 42 – Bufferyards, with the Zoning Ordinance. Streamway Buffer Credit: Where a Site Plan, Development Plan or Concept Plan is required by Section 40 or Section 41, City Council may completely or partially waive Bufferyard requirements on any boundary of a site or portion thereof which lies within a naturally-occurring stream corridor as defined in Section 42.2.g and in accordance with the City of Southlake Code Chapter 9.5, Subsection 82, “Open Channel Policy.” To qualify for credit, the streamway buffer must meet the following: 1. The streamway buffer must be designated on the plat as a Streamway Buffer Easement or by appropriate instrument in the County records. The plat or easement must clearly state that no activity or clearing of vegetation shall take place without prior authorization from the City of Southlake, except in the case of an imminent threat to life or property. Monuments shall be set on the property to delineate the boundary of the easement; 2. The extent of the buffer and the existing trees therein shall be documented as part of a required tree survey, and the limits of the buffer shall be clearly shown on all site and civil plans; 3. For developments with multiple lots under an owner’s association, it shall be the option of the developer to designate the buffer as a separate lot under common ownership in lieu of a Streamway Buffer easement. The lot must be dedicated as a common area under ownership of the Property Owners’ Association to prevent alteration or development. If the developer elects this option, or if the buffer lot is dedicated to the city of Southlake, bufferyard credit will apply Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 6 to the side(s) of the lot(s) which directly abuts the buffer lot; 4. Adequate protection of the buffer shall be maintained throughout construction. If any damage is done to or within the buffer during construction, the damaged area shall be restored to the maximum extent practicable with native plantings and ground cover. Such restoration shall be completed and new vegetation put in place prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the associated building(s); 5. A streamway buffer may only be used for passive recreation in conjunction with a Site Plan approved by the City, and only where topography and considerations of stream bank stability and the integrity of the riparian area allow for such activity. Allowable uses include pedestrian, bike, or equestrian trails, provided that: (a) any native plant material that is eliminated shall have a minimal impact and shall be replaced elsewhere within the buffer; (b) the total width of the streamway buffer is maintained; and (c) all other regulations of this ordinance are met. In instances where such approved facilities are put in place, limited trimming and maintenance may be performed to keep the facilities usable, so long as no additional clearing of vegetation is performed beyond what existed at the time the trail was completed. In 42-4 no event shall the following uses be permitted in a streamway buffer: playfields, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts or similar facilities, accessory buildings, parking facilities, or trash dumpsters; 6. Additional plantings and/or restoration of the streamway buffer, including replacement of invasive species with native species, is encouraged, provided that such activity results in the planting of native species approved by the Landscape Administrator. Any approved landscaping placed within the buffer area will count toward front or side yard landscaping as required in the Landscape Ordinance, Section 3.3.d; 7. For single lots which contain a stream corridor running within their boundaries rather than along their boundaries, fifty percent (50%) credit shall be given towards plantings and width to the bufferyard required along the lot boundaries roughly parallel to the banks of the preserved stream, or the shortest linear site boundaries on either side if the stream meanders or runs diagonally through the site. Fencing requirements shall not be altered as part of the foregoing bufferyard credit 8. On non-single family residential development, credit for existing trees within the stream corridor may be granted in the following instances: (a) The trees within the stream corridor which are used as credit are native species in healthy condition; (b) For buffers along property lines, the trees within the stream corridor shall be sufficient in number to account for all new plantings that would have been required for a manmade buffer along the same property boundary. No credit will be given for new plantings required outside of the buffer unless a surplus of native trees exist within the streamway buffer above what would normally be required for bufferyard plantings along the same property boundary; (c) If the requirements of subsection b are met, credit may be granted on a one for one basis towards any required planting within the interior of the site, other required bufferyards, or the Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 7 parking lot; provided, however, that the required plantings within these areas individually are not reduced by more than twenty percent (20%) of the minimum requirements for any lot, building, or off-street parking area. All other requirements such as fencing type and height, irrigation, and parking lot island width shall be unaffected by this provision; (d) The trees used as credit shall be clearly tabulated and marked on the approved Landscape Plan by species and caliper inch size; (e) On commercial developments with multiple lots or zero lot line buildings with common parking and amenities, or on sites where the developer elects to parcel off or dedicate the buffer lot, credit toward required plantings shall be given only for the lot(s) which contains or abuts the stream corridor; (f) An applicant who elects to preserve a streamway buffer for credit against bufferyard and tree planting requirements shall still be required to preserve the minimum percentage of existing tree coverage as required in the most 42-5 current Tree Preservation Ordinance, or its successor ordinances. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-VVVV.) * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 8 Public Works/Engineering Review Sandra Endy, P.E. Development Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Show and label all existing and proposed easements on the Site Plan. * If the drives that are proposed to be pavers will be labeled as fire lane, the pavers will be required to be able to hold the weight of a fire truck. * Retaining walls greater than 4’ in height, measured from the bottom of wall to top of footing, shall require a separate permit. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 2. A dedicated drainage easement will be required to be dedicated for the existing creek. The easement should be sized to contain the 100-year storm event plus 1-foot of freeboard. 3. The underground drainage system will be required to be located within a dedicated drainage easement. 4. Ensure that the Intensity value used conforms to most current version of the ISWM manual, updated on 4/2020. 5. The front walkways were revised to be less steep, however, the walkways at the rear of the main building are very steep slopes and not ADA compliant. * The underground detention is placed along the banks of the creek and floodplain/floodway. It is highly suggested that erosion protection be installed in these locations to protect the underground system. UTILITY COMMENTS: 6. The proposed waterline loop water easement shall be a minimum 10’ easement. 7. The fire hydrants, domestic water meters and irrigation meters shall be located within the water easement also. * The construction of the sewer within floodplain will require a floodplain development permit to be submitted and approved prior to approval of the civil construction plans. * Please be aware that the water connections crossing Davis Blvd will need TxDOT approval and will most likely be required to be bored under Davis Blvd. * Ensure that the water and sewer maintain the required 9’ separation distance. Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 9 Fire Department Review Lorenzo Chavez Fire Marshall Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: lchavez@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (Per 2021 IFC Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended). Plan does not indicate square footage of cottages if they will be sprinklered. If the risers for the sprinkled buildings are further than 100 feet from the water main, measured linearly along the pipe, the double check valve for the sprinkler system shall be in a vault. Developments having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. The secondary emergency access driveway is sufficient to meet the remote distance requirement. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 300 feet for commercial/residential locations that have both un-sprinklered and sprinklered buildings or 500 feet if all areas are sprinklered. Plans do not indicate if cottages will be sprinklered nor proposed hydrant locations within the site plan. Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. The Fire Department Connections for the sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 of a fire lane. A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: The gated entries across fire department access must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the gate electronically, as indicated in the notes, as well as a means for manual opening of the gate. Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for sprinkled buildings, and 150 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for un-sprinkled buildings. This distance exceeds 250 feet on the north side of the main building. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW). Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2021 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) Case No. Attachment C ZA24-0051 Page 10 General Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit appropriate Plat(s) must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Roadway Impact Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA24-0051 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC AG 220 DAVIS BLVD 0.254923299 NR 2 LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC RE5 200 DAVIS BLVD 2.964479769 NR 3 AJLOUNI, RAED AG 2415 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.20557936 NR 4 QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 109 BROCK DR 0.341743361 NR 5 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 324 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.45322094 NR 6 VARGAS, PERRY W SF1-A 209 BROCK DR 0.96827673 NR 7 KAMIREDDY, NALINI TZD 420 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.016241381 NR 8 CASTRO, ANDRES M TZD 424 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.091905963 NR 9 MORGAN, ERIC SF1-A 303 BROCK DR 1.009282095 O 10 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 451 DAVIS BLVD 0.032687654 NR 11 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 500 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.443916947 NR 12 PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 319 BROCK DR 0.590346813 O 13 KHAN, SAUD TZD 504 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.093881455 NR 14 SU, VAN TZD 508 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.052567754 NR 15 PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 329 BROCK DR 0.354592266 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA24-0051 Page 2 16 CIUNCIUSKY, ALEX TZD 512 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.038857075 NR 17 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2400 LOWER BROOK CT 2.779697572 NR 18 UPADHYAYULA, SRIRAMA TZD 516 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.053383423 NR 19 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 524 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.484119185 NR 20 KIM, SANGTAE TZD 520 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.061233863 NR 21 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 528 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.05000505 NR 22 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 600 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.519544619 NR 23 GALLEGOS, MIRIAM TZD 604 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.114054004 NR 24 TIA LUNA LIVING TRUST RPUD 2401 LOWER BROOK CT 0.198541559 NR 25 NALLIAH, RAJAGURU TZD 608 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.187132305 NR 26 MCGEE, GRANT TZD 612 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.146245017 NR 27 C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2440 MICHAEL DR 0.043369848 NR 28 CT PLUS 4 LLC AG 2420 MICHAEL DR 0.954079583 NR 29 JOHNSON, GEORGE AG 2390 MICHAEL DR 1.053277039 NR 30 HPI SOUTHLAKE STORAGE LLC SP1 750 DAVIS BLVD 2.106923576 NR 31 MATHIS, JESSICA D AG 755 DAVIS BLVD 0.221809161 NR 32 JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 864 DAVIS BLVD 0.552002364 NR 33 ZVONECEK, BRIAN AG 855 DAVIS BLVD 0.581191726 NR 34 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 512 BLUFFVIEW TER 0.585812673 NR 35 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 610 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.059697438 NR 36 BASANI, PRASAD TZD 616 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.276152833 NR 37 JENAL FAMILY LIVING TRUST TZD 416 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.270814065 NR 38 PRANEETHA, KRANTHI TZD 412 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.2750654 NR 39 RAMNANI, KISHORE TZD 408 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.273571546 NR 40 K & B PROPERTIES LP AG 2365 MICHAEL DR 0.537199707 NR 41 JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 860 DAVIS BLVD 1.150493747 NR 42 QUINN, WILLIAM AG 2435 MICHAEL DR 0.548418411 NR 43 C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2425 MICHAEL DR 1.105751159 NR 44 RBJH REAL ESTATE LLC AG 2395 MICHAEL DR 1.041778867 NR 45 QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.47613194 NR 46 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD SF1-A 250 BROCK DR 1.223994379 NR 47 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2524 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.544931032 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA24-0051 Page 3 48 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2528 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.5663939 NR 49 REDMON, TERRANCE RPUD 2405 LOWER BROOK CT 0.389897675 O 50 MCCALL, HAROLD L SF1-A 320 BROCK DR 1.105676593 NR 51 ARORA, RAMAN RPUD 2532 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.637548689 NR 52 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2520 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.371537697 NR 53 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 110 STONY BROOK WAY 3.593768833 NR 54 SOUTHLAKE BAPTIST CHURCH INC CS 2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 8.853773089 NR 1000 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 600 DAVIS BLVD 3.064166244 U 1001 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 300 DAVIS BLVD 6.184113889 U 1002 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 504 DAVIS BLVD 2.099150274 U 1003 KUELBS, GREGORY G SF1-A 684 DAVIS BLVD 5.085568772 U 1004 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 500 DAVIS BLVD 5.569906049 U Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: 39 Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES – SECOND NOTICE SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 KARTHIK & ASSOCIATES REALTY LL C2 2345 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.213516692 NR 2 AJLOUNI, RAED AG 2415 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.985579633 NR 3 ENCORE RETAIL DEV CO LP SP2 180 DAVIS BLVD 0.781191373 NR 4 GKP INVESTMENTS LLC SP2 190 DAVIS BLVD 1.351614204 NR 5 LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC AG 220 DAVIS BLVD 0.715924859 NR 6 TAK ENTERPRISES INC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.067891484 NR 7 QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.422435084 NR 8 QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 109 BROCK DR 0.52259359 NR 9 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 324 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.474842408 NR 10 VARGAS, PERRY W SF1-A 209 BROCK DR 0.968519076 NR 11 KAMIREDDY, NALINI TZD 420 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.01624148 NR 12 CASTRO, ANDRES M TZD 424 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.091905963 NR 13 MORGAN, ERIC SF1-A 303 BROCK DR 1.009282095 O 14 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 451 DAVIS BLVD 0.032687654 NR Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 2 15 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 500 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.443916947 NR 16 PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 319 BROCK DR 0.590346813 O 17 KHAN, SAUD TZD 504 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.093881455 NR 18 SU, VAN TZD 508 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.052567754 NR 19 PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 329 BROCK DR 0.354592266 NR 20 CIUNCIUSKY, ALEX TZD 512 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.038857075 NR 21 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2400 LOWER BROOK CT 2.779697572 NR 22 UPADHYAYULA, SRIRAMA TZD 516 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.053383509 NR 23 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 524 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.484119185 NR 24 KIM, SANGTAE TZD 520 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.061233769 NR 25 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 528 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.05000505 NR 26 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 600 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.519544619 NR 27 GALLEGOS, MIRIAM TZD 604 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.114053747 NR 28 TIA LUNA LIVING TRUST RPUD 2401 LOWER BROOK CT 0.198541559 NR 29 NALLIAH, RAJAGURU TZD 608 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.187132562 NR 30 MCGEE, GRANT TZD 612 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.146378702 NR 31 C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2440 MICHAEL DR 0.043369848 NR 32 CT PLUS 4 LLC AG 2420 MICHAEL DR 0.954079583 NR 33 JOHNSON, GEORGE AG 2390 MICHAEL DR 1.053277039 NR 34 HPI SOUTHLAKE STORAGE LLC SP1 750 DAVIS BLVD 2.106923576 NR 35 MATHIS, JESSICA D AG 755 DAVIS BLVD 0.221921381 NR 36 MCNACK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC SP1 2335 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.49094107 NR 37 TUCKER 23 LLC C2 170 DAVIS BLVD 0.236479554 NR 38 JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 864 DAVIS BLVD 0.552002364 NR 39 ZVONECEK, BRIAN AG 855 DAVIS BLVD 0.581191726 NR 40 RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 512 BLUFFVIEW TER 0.585812673 NR 41 PEDDIREDDY, SHIVA TZD 400 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.269658591 NR 42 VILLAS OF HIDDEN KNOLL HOA TZD 610 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.059697438 NR 43 BASANI, PRASAD TZD 616 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.276152833 NR Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 3 44 DAI, JUN TZD 404 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.278716009 NR 45 JENAL FAMILY LIVING TRUST TZD 416 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.270814065 NR 46 PRANEETHA, KRANTHI TZD 412 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.2750654 NR 47 RAMNANI, KISHORE TZD 408 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.273571546 NR 48 K & B PROPERTIES LP AG 2365 MICHAEL DR 0.537199707 NR 49 JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 860 DAVIS BLVD 1.150493747 NR 50 QUINN, WILLIAM AG 2435 MICHAEL DR 0.548418411 NR 51 C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2425 MICHAEL DR 1.105751159 NR 52 RBJH REAL ESTATE LLC AG 2395 MICHAEL DR 1.041778867 NR 53 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD SF1-A 250 BROCK DR 1.223994379 NR 54 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2524 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.544931032 NR 55 BRENNAN, JOE RPUD 2528 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.5663939 NR 56 REDMON, TERRANCE RPUD 2405 LOWER BROOK CT 0.389897675 O 57 MCCALL, HAROLD L SF1-A 320 BROCK DR 1.105676593 NR 58 ARORA, RAMAN RPUD 2532 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.637548689 NR 59 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2520 PARK GROVE LOOP 0.371537697 NR 60 CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 110 STONY BROOK WAY 3.593768833 NR 61 SOUTHLAKE BAPTIST CHURCH INC CS 2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 8.853773089 NR 1000 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 600 DAVIS BLVD 3.064166244 U 1001 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 300 DAVIS BLVD 6.184113889 U 1002 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 504 DAVIS BLVD 2.099150274 U 1003 LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC RE5 200 DAVIS BLVD 5.113118451 U 1004 KUELBS, GREGORY G SF1-A 684 DAVIS BLVD 5.085568772 U 1005 KUELBS, GREGORY G RE5 500 DAVIS BLVD 5.569906049 U Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: 49 Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-823 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1A, 1B, 2, AND 3, PARKER’S CORNER ADDITION AND TRACT 2A02, J. ALLEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 18, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “RE5” RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT AND “SF-1A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO “TZD” TRANSITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 5 Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 6 rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parker’s Corner Addition and Tract 2A02, J. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “TZD” Transitional Zoning District as depicted on the Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 7 approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions: 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 8 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 9 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2024. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2024. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA24-0051 Page 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-824 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1A, 1B, 2, AND 3, PARKER’S CORNER ADDITION AND TRACT 2A02, J. ALLEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 18, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “RE5” RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT AND “SF- 1A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 2 Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 3 rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parker’s Corner Addition and Tract 2A02, J. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District as depicted on the Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 4 approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions: 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 5 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 6 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2024. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2024. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 8 EXHIBIT “A” Being described as Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parker’s Corner Addition and Tract 2A02, J. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Metes and Bounds Description Reserved for metes and bounds description Case No. Attachment F ZA24-0051 Page 9 EXHIBIT “B” Reserved for approved Site Plan