Item 7A - Corridor ReportCITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
0
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report
Meeting 48 — June 5, 2024
MEETING
LOCATION: 1400 Main St., Southlake, Texas 76092
City Council Chambers
IN
ATTENDANCE:
• City Council Members: Frances Scharli, Kathy Talley
• Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Daniel Kubiak
• Parks Board: Magdalena Battles
• City Staff: Dennis Killough, Jenny Crosby, Reagan Rothenberger,
Madeline Prater, Bless Nkashama
AGENDA
ITEMS:
1. Call to Order.
2. Administrative Comments.
3. Review, discuss and make recommendations regarding a proposed
expansion of the Trinity River Authority's Kirkwood Lift Station located at
3200 N. White Chapel Blvd. and 1350 W. Kirkwood Blvd.
4. Review, discuss and make recommendations regarding a proposed three-
story medical office building on approximately 2.65 acres at 451 E. SH 114.
5. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed development
with three single -story office buildings on approximately 2.59 acres at 360
Randol Mill Ave.
6. Review, discuss, and make recommendations regarding the Gateway
Church Chapel and Event Center at 701 Blessed Way.
7. Review, discuss, and make recommendations regarding a proposed mixed
use development, located at 1963 W. Southlake Blvd., generally located
southeast of the W. Southlake Blvd. and Players Circle intersection.
8. Review, discuss and make recommendations regarding Carillon Phase 2,
generally located at the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E.
SH 114.
9. Adjournment
MEETING
OVERVIEW:
On June 5, 2024 the Southlake Corridor Planning Committee held their
forty-eighth meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior
to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting
agenda was posted, and the meeting time was advertised on the City's
website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made
during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff.
This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting
minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City
staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee,
City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process.
Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information.
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
0
ITEM #8 DISCUSSION — Review, discuss and make recommendations regarding
Carillon Phase 2, generally located at the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd.
and E. SH 114.
Staff presentation: Reagan Rothenberger
• REVISION #1 Change dedication of portion of public park space to Open Space
• REVISION #2 "Allow the developer flexibility to develop retail restaurant, office,
or private club if Public Library is not built within the development, leaving option
for library or performing arts use."
• REVISION #3 "Developer to combine two buildings into one building, allowing for
potential underground parking." Will bring with future site plan.
• REVISION #4 "Optional detention/retention pond with fountain if needed for
storm drainage. If built, developer will assume cost of maintenance of the pond
and fountain." Built as aesthetic amenity and with support and input from
community.
• REVISION #5 "Change dedication of public road to private drive for future valet,
and drop-off with speed ramp into the garage."
• REVISION #6 "Requesting second entrance pending on Hwy 114 frontage road
upon TXDOT approval."
• REVISION #7 "Change unit size from 2,300 SF minimum to 2,300 SF average
with a minimum of 2,000 SF. The number of units will remain at 50 maximum."
Questions for staff by the Committee:
N/A
Applicant presentation: John Terrell
Questions for applicant by the Committee:
Kathy Talley: Big picture — 7 items as well last year. One of the difficulties I felt we had
last time was 2 or 3 of those pieces had concerns/issues/questions and we couldn't get
around those to approve the whole thing. When you decide to bring it forward, have you
considered parsing out the pieces independently or in smaller chunks?
Applicant: From last year's proposal, we were asking for 5 early lot releases. This
year's proposal is for the dedication of park space to open space. From follow-up
feedback, the main issue stemmed from the 5-lot early release for the St. Jude custom
built homes. This issue is off the table now. The other items seem to be open for most
of City Council.
Kathy Talley: First 2 revisions are the most complicated and challenging for me — these
will bring up the most discussion. The other pieces seem to make sense. Toughest
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024 Page 3
ones to work through will be revisions 1 and 2. My understanding was that we were not
going to be responsible for the maintenance of the fountain no matter what.
Applicant: Correct, currently the city has maintenance of the park and developer has
maintenance of the fountain. But with this change, the city would not have to maintain
the park.
Kathy Talley: Based on what I've heard, open space vs park space — open space is a
reduction around an acre or two; park space stays from 8 to 9. Council has not come to
a decision on the Library, we're trying to get there. As we go through this, what will that
deadline look like. With some of these, it's quite possible these would not be issues.
Frances Scharli: I also have concerns with revisions 1 and 2 — this might not be the
right forum for this tonight. By changing from public parks to open space, it gives
flexibility to give some back. I like the permanency of a public park.
Magdalena Battles: Open space vs. park space — the precedent has been set in
Southlake where a developer comes in and will dedicate/donate certain amount of
acreage for park space and it's owned by the city. However, in my neighborhood the
HOA has to maintain the ponds, fountains, and all the mowing even though the city
owns it. My fear is the developer coming back and saying we could get more stores and
take more of the park space.
Applicant: The city is already committed to 100% of the park maintenance and 50% of
building the park. We want to release the city from this to allow some of the flexibility
going forward.
Kathy Talley: Right now, it's dedication of 8 to 9 acres to the city as park space. Which
is why revisions 1 and 2 are so important.
Applicant: Significant to the developer — goes into programming of the park to control
those activities and placement of the kiosks. We think we can get the city comfortable
with the amount of park land to open space that will not change.
Daniel Kubiak: Roughly these revisions came to this group about 6-12 months ago,
went to Council and got turned down.
Daniel Kubiak: When this originally came through a long time ago, it was the only time
I've seen a room full of people supporting something. As you bring this forward again,
should we expect the same turnout?
Applicant: We will have everyone out here.
Kathy Talley: Revisions 1, 2 and 4 — challenging. Revisions 3, 5, 6 and 7 — might not
be as difficult. Thoughts about breaking these up into those categories?
Applicant: We can't do that — the timing is crucial for these.
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024 Page 4
Daniel Kubiak: Important for those Council conversations to happen on the front end.
STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE:
aSOUTHLAI<E
1
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024
Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Page 5
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024
Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Page 6
IS Nil
w u
IIII' ,
T
Current Zoning
SH 114
Corridor
roawad r.om.ri a.
w ewr.uu eiw ceou*+a uw "'� ^T
Optional
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024 Page 7
ti I xa r�
I -- •i s �� '3
t n�«.w000a�vo.
I
LL11 LLI I_LLI I"I_S ��
I
2 �y q 1
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024
ZONING UPDATE
REVISION I" Change dedication of public park space to open space (same acreage
reduced by revision 42 area to accommodate library/performing
am/co-mi
REVISION N2 "Allowthe developer fle.ibility to develop retail restaurant, aM,.,
or private club it Puhlic Lihrary is net built within the development, leaving option
for library or performing arts use(25,980 SF floorplate with 2 stories over parking
garage)."
REVISION il3 "The developer will combine the two buildings into one building
(23,100 SF floorplate), allowing for potential underground parking"
REVISION #4 "Optional detention retention pond with fountain if needed for
storm drainage. If built, developer will assume cost of maintenance a the
fountain."
REVISION p5 "ROW for future valet, and drop•oft to he private drive and
developer will pay for construction and maintenance. This drive will be
constructed as part of Phase IA."
REVISION #6 "Future projectentrance pending TXOCrr approval."
j REVISION #7 "Change unit size from 2,300 SF minimum to 2,300 SF average with a
minimum of 2,00o SF. The number of units will remain at 50 maximum."
.,. Kimley Morn pgEASTTMAN
Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Page 8
OF
SCITYOUTHLAI<E
Southlake Corridor Planning Committee
Meeting #48 —June 5, 2024
Applicant Presentation
Item #8 — Carillon Parc Phase II
Page 9