Item 6A & 6B - PresentationBrumlow East
Land Use Plan Amendment
Zoning Change & Development Plan
Items 6A & 6B
CP24-0002 & ZA24-0007
APPLICANT/
OWNER: Sage Group, Inc., on behalf of Wright Brumlow East RE, LLC
REQUEST: Item 6A: Land Use Plan Amendment for a portion of Brumlow East.
Existing Land Use Designation: Industrial and Flood Plain. Proposed
Land Use Designation: Mixed Use
Item 6B: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Brumlow East.
Existing Zoning: “AG” Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: “TZD”
Transition Zoning District.
LOCATION: 1719 E. Continental Blvd along with 1451, 1535 and 1537 Brumlow Ave
Item 6: Future Land Use
Item 6: Proposed Land Use Amendment
Item 6: Land Use Tables
*These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide.
Consolidated Land Use Plan
Mixed Use Recommended Land Use Mix*
Proposed Land Use Mix (includes entirety of development)
Current Zoning
Aerial
Current Street View of Site: 1719 E. Continental Blvd
Current Street View of Site: Brumlow Ave
East Elevation
Proposed Development Regulations
Previous Development Plan
Previous Landscape Plan
Revised Development Plan
Revised Landscape Plan
Tree Preservation
Existing Coverage: 12.62%
Required to remain if straight zoning: 70%
Tree canopy proposed to remain: 27.86%
Existing Drainage
Proposed Drainage
Residential Character Images
Commercial Character Images
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
For:
Opposed:
Undecided:
SPO 3: Staercke, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 5: Trevino, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 8: Howell, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 23: Ducey, Opposed (Comment Card)
SPO 46: Yonkoski, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 47: Dachniwsky, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 52: Davis, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 76: Pitcher, Opposed (Online Form)
SPO 30: Jacobson, In Favor (Comment Card)
SPO 31: Hasselfeldt, In Favor (Online Form)
For: 4
Opposed: 39
Undecided: 3
Outside 300’
For: 2
Opposed: 7
Undecided: 0
Within 200’
Opposition Percentage: 6.5%
For: 2
Opposed: 8
Undecided: 0
Within 300’
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
Item 6A: April 4, 2024; APPROVED (5-0).
Item 6B: April 4, 2024: APPROVED (5-0), Subject to Staff Report dated
March 28, 2024, and Development Plan Review Summary No.
2, dated March 28, 2024, noting the applicant’s willingness to
address traffic calming along the north/south stretch of the
roadway within the development.
City Council Action
Item 6A: May 7, 2024: APPROVED (5-2), subject to Staff Report dated April 30, 2024, and
noting that with this motion we would be approving an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan from Industrial to Mixed-use subject to the Staff Report dated April
30, 2024.
Item 6B: May 7, 2024: APPROVED (5-2), subject to Staff Report dated April 30, 2024, and the
Development Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated April 30, 2024, noting the following
conditions: Directing the applicant to work with city staff and the city attorney to craft a note to
be placed on future plats or CCA’s for the residential portion of the development acknowledging
the adjacency of intensive non-residential industrial type uses and operations including the
future municipal service center and public safety training tower facility. Also noting the
applicant’s willingness to come to second reading with a more detailed look at what the
proposed landscape plan might be for the flood plain area. Also noting the applicant has agreed
to come to second reading with options to present as it relates to Continental Blvd. and how
best to handle deceleration and access to the neighborhood.
Both items were tabled at the 2nd reading held on June 4, 2024, at the request of the applicant,
to the August 6th, 2024, then to the August 20, 2024 and subsequently to the September 3,
2024 City Council Meeting.
Questions?
Applicant Presentation
Proposed Commercial Development Plan
Proposed Residential Development Plan
First Reading Development Plan
Municipal Service Center
Aerial
Similar Zoning Examples
*Net Acreage for a specific neighborhood as part of an overall development.
Development Dwelling
Units/Acre Zoning Gross Acreage Avg. Lot Size by Square
Feet
Open Space in
Acres (% of gross)No. of Units
Tuscan Ridge 5 MH 11.35 ~8,000 N/A 57
Carillon Parc*5 ECZ 15.8*5,600
(Min. 4,950)N/A 79
Crescent Royale
Phase 1&2 (Timarron)*3.22 RPUD 53.74*7,200
(Min. 6,000)7.35 (14%)173
Tealwood 2.77 TZD 5.4 10,000 .62 (12.8%)15
Brenwyck II (Timarron)*2.5 RPUD 44.78*11,000 1.33 112
Ridgeview 2.34 TZD 13.22 ~11,500 2.76 (20.88%)31
Watermere – South Village 2.10 TZD 33.72 Varies per Phase
(Minimum 7,400)9.91 (29%)71
Metairie 1.91 TZD 29.3 12,580 4.4 acres (15%)56
Brumlow East 1.61 TZD 32.8 Minimum 6,600 13.26 (40.41%)53
Proposed Fencing/Wall Plan
Proposed Open Space Plan
Existing Traffic Conditions & Effect of Development
24 HOUR TRIPS Continental Trips Brumlow Trips 24 Hour Total
56 Homes 291 291 582
Office/Warehouse 172 686 858
Existing Traffic 12,373 13,299 25,672
Cumulative Impact 12,373 +463 = 3.7%13,299 +977 = 7.3%25,672 +1,440 = 5.6%
Trip Data from ITE Manual and Provided Traffic Impact Analysis by Kimley-Horn
Existing Traffic Counts from 2017 Lee Engineering Traffic Count Report
AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS Continental Trips Brumlow Trips
56 Homes 6 6
Office/Warehouse 22 87
Existing Traffic 1,428 1,004
Cumulative Impact 1,428 +28 = 2%1004 +93 = 9%