Item 7B - SPIN ReportUSOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2024-07
City Case Number: ZA24-0030
Project Name: Dakota's Steakhouse
SPIN Neighborhood: 4
Meeting Date: April 9, 2024
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 7
Hosts: Muhammad Igbal
Applicant Presenting: Tim McEneny
City Staff Present: Madeline Prater, Business Manager
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation: 479 N. Kimball Ave.
Development Details:
• Proposed 15,000 sq. ft. restaurant pad site
• Proposed Event Space — 250 seats
• Current Zoning: AG
• Proposed Rezone: C-2 Retail Commercial District
• Parking — Restaurants: 1 space per each 3 seats under max seating
arrangement or 1 space per 100sf
• Option 1: "Underground" Restaurant — Exterior Seating — Separate Events
Building
• Option 2: "Underground" Restaurant — Separate Events Building `Lifted Horizon'
• Option 3: Above -Ground Restaurant — Separate Events Building
Presentation:
►i�►1�4... IIIII�IIIIfII_Illlljll► .rl��i,IJ,
DM DMAG DAKOTA'S STEAKHOUSE
Architecture INITIAL DESIGN PRESENTATION
A
■ 1 C & interiors 02.15.2024
❑akota's steakhouselln iriai oe s,sn aresencaion
TEKTURES AND IMPRESSIONS FROM NATURE/ LANDSCAPE.
AAA DMAC
A rchitect pre
AC a mte«—
TEXTURES AND IMPRESSIONS FROM VATVRE/ L4MDSCAFE.
3 oMAC
❑akata's Steakhouse I irtitlal Design Presenaton Archltectc m
airs+,u.xcrsx:ssrmouw_Lini s2s n AC EIiH
Program
Dakota's Steakhouse
• 15000sf pad site Restaurant
• Event Space: 250 seats
Prefunction
BOH Catering Kitchen (1500sf)
Outdoor Event Space?
Program q ::)M DMAC
OakoTaS Steakhouse initial i)esign Presentation AIcAiteclure
K�ro,..,,...v.x�m..� x. n A� dlnteriors
Zoning Info
Dakota's Steakhouse
• Current Zone: AG
• Rezone to: C-2 Local Retail Commercial District
• Allowed uses: "Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and "take-out" food restaurants."
• Height: 2.5 stories max / 35'
• Setback:
• Front: 30 ft
• Side: 15 ft (abutting lots zoned: AG (S) and AG (N)
• Rear: 10 ft (unless residential abutting: 25 ft) (adjacent lots are zoned SF-1A)
• Lot Coverage: max 50%
• Floor Area: 40,000 sf max
• Max Impervious Coverage: 70%
• Trash must be screened
• Section 43: Residential Adjacency Standards
Parking
• Restaurants: 1 space per each 3 seats under max seating arrangement or 1 space per laOsf (whichever
is greater)
Program
ilalmta� Steakhouse I initial ❑esign Presentation
F�rmaaunersn:cvrtoww=ws.rt��x.ix n
9
i
irrnr
krn�'�c a
lkk
r E%S. CAS STATION
-Ir
5 ::)M DMAC
A r[hitect ure
AC a IiHerinrs
STEA.CHOUA I
_i0 ENT BLIILOING7 r
E%TERIOR
SEATING
y \� PAPNING
Option 1
"Underground"
Restaurant
Exterior seating
Separate Events Building
SITEOPTION't- OVERVIEW MAC
DakotaY Steakhouse l3n itial ❑esign Presentation
Ar[hiteCSurc
F��.,,.a�r.a...•ar:=w�.�R�s:.� •� AC d Irderiorc
Option 1 -Restaurant Approach 10 ::)M DMAC
❑alwta� steakhouse I Initial design Presentation
AC: Ar[hite[turc
ai�ma.uccs-sa:scnonw=.asnc,�:•:.-:ncz a �iHennrs
Option 1 - Bird's Eye • Residential Side 33 ]M DMAC
Dakota's Steakhouse/ Inibal Design Presentation Architecture
IIC a imeriers
Option 1 - Exterior Seating 16 ]M oMAC
Da,!ota's Steakhouse) �nitlal Design Presentation Architecture
F.� :a:ua.ou _ R,.a.,.•:.� AC & I neners
. r
�_{ ASS
EXS. GAS 5TAT ION
41k -t
SITE OPTION 2 - OVERVIEW
I
STEAMDUEN 1
EXTERIOR
EVENTS
EVENT
JILDING�
4 PARKING
� 6111LpINC�,E�TRV1
Option 2
"Underground"
Restaurant
Separate Events Building
`Lifted Horizon'
17
:)M ❑MAC
Architecture
AC AIntied-
Optlon2-Bird%Gye-Street Side -'Lifted Horizon' 12 ]M DMAC
Dakotas 5[eakho Initial Design Pre ne ion Architecture IMien CSu
L"
Option 2 - Exterior View at Entry I Street 19 ]M DMAC
.7akata§ 5*eakhousellnitlal i7e s:yn Pre=_entation
AC ArCM1ite[ture
ai�ter�ars
Option 2 - Exterior View at Entry 1 Street 20 ]M DMAC
Dakota's Steakhouses Initlal Design Presentation
AC ArcAteCt-e
Option 2 - Vim at Steakhouse at Street Side 22 ]M MAC
❑alwta5 Steakhouse/ Initlal �esrgn Presentation Architect.,*
Above -Ground
Restaurant
Separate Events Building
SITE OPTION 3 - OVERVIEW
❑akota5 Steakhouses Initial design Pre=_�rta=ion
Comments, Questions, and Concerns:
Concern: Commercial creep and traffic pattern.
Question: Does anyone in your group own any land adjacent to this property?
Answer: No — There are now investors or other individuals who own property here.
Question: Have any of the surrounding property owners met with you about this
development?
Answer: No, but we were told by one of the property owners that the houses along the
back and east side are all his and no one is living there. But I hear you — you want to
know how this will impact your neighborhood. I'm not familiar with how the District 114
development came together, but since that area built up commercially, we were looking
at this site. If this was all residential property, I wouldn't even be here doing this.
Concern: We are worried you might need more parking or space and this development
creeps more east or north into our neighborhood. And with traffic, we're worried about
big events with lots of cars accessing cut-throughs by our neighborhood. It is very
dense trying to leave our neighborhood.
Answer: We had a meeting about traffic issues and will get a study done.
Question: How is this piece of property zoned today?
Answer: AG — Agricultural.
Question: Possibility of putting an access driveway off the 114-access road — would
that be on the gas station drive? Or further east?
Answer: We don't know yet — the Council and I spoke about that, and multiple people
would need to be involved with this. From my understanding, this piece of property has
tried to be rezoned multiple times and for the protection of residents that has not
happened.
Question: At the east edge of the property, there are residential lots between that line
and Shady Ln. — is this planning to take any of those?
Answer: No. The 4-acres we have right now will be more than enough.
Comment: Appreciate the presentation, and I think a steakhouse would do amazing
here. What sets this apart in my mind from other steakhouse restaurants is the idea of
the event space. I would like some more clarity about the proposed event space.
Answer: We would make it that operations cease before midnight — no late -night
permit. We can put restrictions on it. We can front load this property and place parking
in the back to create a buffer for noise and light. We'll also place landscaping and an
entry wall around this property.
Comment: I advise you to ask the city for all the traffic information. The Kimball
intersection is the worst.
Comment: We do not want more traffic on Shady Lane or using it as a cut -through.
Answer: My thought is that traffic should not be going that way anyways — stay off
Shady Lane.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Southlake Connect Results for the April 9, 2024 SPIN Town Hall Forum
Everbrldge Suite
City Of SOuthlske - Citizen Alert (Organization Admin)
.,e
Dashboard Universe
Incidents Contacts
Reports Settings Access
Reports > Detailed Notification Analysis > SPIN Town Hall Forum -April 9th
Detailed Notification Analysis
SPIN Town Hall Forum - April 9th
DETAILS
259 (220%)Atdempted-
Notification ID 1569039063193907
Confirmed
eeti00
Live
Mad
Mode
-N$c7C nrinmedAltempted
■ 264 (2.16%)Atdempted-
Notficetion
Standard
Not Connected
Type
2354 (20.01%) Not
Start Date Apr Z 2D24
Attempted
StartTime 14:37:50 CDT
■ 111 (0.94%) Other
Confirmation Yea
Hide Detatla
Requested
Cell Throttling Yes
Call Reaults(per Delivery Path)
Total
%of Total
Duration 6 hr(a)
Message Voice/Text
Format
Vaicemail Message Only
Preference
Confirmed
259
2.20%
Delivery Order Organization Default
Delivery Methods
Organization Contacts
'.PrimarySMS
Delivered
71
0.60%
2.SeoondarySMS
3.Primary Email
4.Primary Mobile
Delivered - To Voioemail
1800
15.30%
5.SecondaryEmail
6.SeoondaryMobile
7.Horn Phone
Not Delivered - No Answer
132
1.12%
8.Home Phone *2
9.Buaineae Phone
1 O.TTY / TTD Device
Delivered - To Handset
2936
24.96%
11.Everbridge Mobile Ap
Resident Connection
1.VOIP
Not Delivered - Voicemail Hung
129
1 10%
2.1-andline
Up
Not Delivered- Recipient Hung Up
370
3.14%
Sent
3349
28.47%
Attempted - Not Connected
Not Delivered- Invalid Number
63
0.54%
Not Delivered - Out of Service
98
0.83%
Not Delivered- Carrier Expired
11
D.09%
Not Delivered- Downstream
69
0.59%
Communication Error
Not Delivered- Carrier Rejected
2
0.D2%
Not Delivered- Line Buay
11
0.D9%
0
1/2
Call Results(per Delivery Path)
Total
of Total
Not Attempted
Not Attempted - Inactive Path
257
2.18%
Not Attempted - Unsubscribed
1269
10.79%
Not Delivered- Contact Path Not
8
0.07%
Defined
Not Delivered- Duplicate Path
820
6,97%
Othe'.
Not Delivered - Bounced Email
98
0,83%
Not Delivered - Contact
Unavailable
13
0.11 %
Attempts Over Time
7.5k
51,
2.5k
Ok
Shaw Detalls
'Peverbridge-
Pr� POHM . Toms of Us . ® 2024 Everbridge, Inc.
24.3.0.32-6d5Ob53-2024-07-08-07:55 FE-VERSION 0 ebamanager-portal-6455b65875-m7c81
212