Item 7 - Staff ReportCase No.
ZA24-0007
S T A F F R E P O R T
March 28, 2024
CASE NO: ZA24-0007
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Brumlow East EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Sage Group, Inc., on behalf of Wright Brumlow East RE, LLC, are requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Brumlow East, on
property described as a portion of Tract 1A, Harrison Decker Survey Abstract 438,
and Tracts 2E04, 2E06 and a portion of Tract 2E07A, John N. Gibson Survey
Abstract 591, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1719 E.
Continental Blvd. and 1451 – 1537 Brumlow Ave., Southlake, Texas. Current
Zoning: “AG” Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: “TZD” Transition Zoning
District SPIN District #8.
DETAILS: This project is approximately 32.8-acres of land generally located southeast of the
intersection of East Continental Boulevard and Brumlow Avenue.
The purpose of this request is to approve a Zoning Change and a Development
Plan for a 32.8-acre mixed-use development encompassing a single-family
residential component with 56 residential homes, and approximately 71,000
square-feet of office and office/warehouse buildings. The property is proposed to
be zoned using the “TZD” Transition Zoning District.
The “Neighborhood Edge” consists of garden office buildings and is proposed to
be adjacent to Brumlow Avenue while the office/warehouses are to be located at
the rear. Development Regulations provide that the building be permitted “I-1”
Light Industrial District uses. The proposed maximum building height is one-story,
35’ and the proposed maximum floor area is 15,000 square feet per building. The
final details of the structures are to be approved by a future Site Plan.
The residential development component of the project encompassing 56 single-
family detached dwellings are proposed to have between 2,500 square feet and
5,200 square feet floor area. The minimum lot size is proposed to be 6,600 square
feet, with a minimum lot width of 50’ and 125’ in depth.
The development is proposed to have two access points. One on Brumlow Avenue
and the other on E Continental Boulevard.
Other development components include a 6’ masonry wall separating the
residential and commercial components of the project. The remainder of the
fences for the residential lots consist of: 6’ iron fence with masonry columns, 8’
wood fence with masonry columns, and 8’ masonry wall.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA24-0007
Specific Development Standards for the entire site are provided herein:
Case No.
ZA24-0007
The following modifications to the “TZD” District requirements are noted:
A. Section 47.7(g): Maximum building footprint permitted in square feet: ‘Financial
and Office Uses: 10,000 square feet’. (Footprint approx. 15,000 sq. ft.)
B. Section 47.7.d(3): The elevation of the home from the finished sidewalk. (Plans
are not specific.)
C. Section 47.7.e: The architectural design standards requirement. (These are
reflected in the General Comments of the attached Development Plan Review
Summary No. 1.) The plans do not reflect the specific materials for the
development nor examples provided.
D. Section 47.7(a)iii: “Cul-de-sacs are prohibited unless natural features such as
topography or stream corridors prevent a street connection.” (There is one cul-
de-sac shown.)
E. Section 47.6: requires a 6’ sidewalk. (The regulations indicate 5’.)
F. Section 47.6(c): requires a planter width of at least 6’. 5’ planters are provided.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 28, 2024
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-810
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Case No.
ZA24-0007
Link to TZD Regulations
Link to Plans
STAFF CONTACT: Reagan Rothenberger (817) 748-8602
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Wright Brumlow East RE, LLC
APPLICANT: Sage Group, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1719 E. Continental Blvd. and 1451 – 1537 Brumlow Ave., Southlake,
Texas.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Portion of Tract 1A, Harrison Decker Survey Abstract 438, and Tracts
2E04, 2E06 and a portion of Tract 2E07A, John N. Gibson Survey Abstract
591, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use; Industrial
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
PROPOSED ZONING: “TZD” Transitional Zoning District, with "I-1" Light Industrial District uses
permitted for the commercial portion, and single-family residences.
HISTORY: The southern portion of the properties located on Brumlow Avenue were
annexed and zoned “AG” per Ordinance No. 89 in 1957.
The northern portion of the properties located on Brumlow Avenue and the
tract addressed as 1719 E Continental Avenue were annexed and zoned
“AG” per Ordinance No. 373 in 1987.
Several older homes exist among the tracts, remaining unplatted, and are
slated for demolition as part of the development.
SOUTHLAKE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The future land use designation for the site is “Mixed Use” and “Industrial”.
The Brumlow Avenue tracts are designated as Mixed Use.
The purpose of the Mixed Use to provide an option for large scale,
master‐planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as
office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The range of
activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity
to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates
comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New
development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing
development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design
and transition between different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation
is intended for medium‐ to higher‐intensity office buildings, hotels,
commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance‐free,
wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no
outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent
uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public
Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi‐Public, Low Density Residential, Medium
Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 2
categories.
The tract addressed as 1719 E Continental Avenue is designated as
Industrial.
The Industrial category is intended for Industrial and business service
development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as
unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the
Industrial category. If meeting the qualification of relatively free of
unwanted side effects, suitable types of development in the Industrial
category can be characterized by the manufacturing, processing,
packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of
products. Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these
uses are permitted. Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi‐Public
activities as described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial
uses do not pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The property is bound by E. Continental Blvd. to the north, and Brumlow
Ave. to the west.
Continental Blvd. is a 2-lane undivided collector. Brumlow Ave. is proposed
to be a 4-lane divided arterial at build out. It is currently a 2-lane undivided
roadway at the location in which the proposed development intersects.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Plan shows a less than 8’ sidewalk along the east side of
Brumlow Ave. The applicant is proposing a 5’ sidewalk along their
developed portion of Brumlow Ave.
The Pathways Plan shows a less than 8’ sidewalk along the south side of E
Continental Blvd. The applicant is proposing to construct a 5’ sidewalk on E
Continental Blvd.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed “TZD” zoning request has an entrance onto E Continental
Blvd. and an entrance onto Brumlow Avenue.
The traffic threshold worksheet was provided by the applicant and shows
that the proposed development does not exceed any of the threshold
criteria. The threshold worksheet provides that the new development will
generate approximately 953 daily trips for residential and 871 daily trips for
office.
TREE PRESERVATION: There is 12.61% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of
70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved if the
project were straight zoning. A minimum of 72.14% is proposed to be
removed and a maximum of 27.86% is proposed to be preserved.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 3
PARK DEDICATION: No park dedication is noted. Fees in lieu of dedication will be required.
UTILITIES: There is an existing 12” water line along E. Continental Blvd. and an
existing 8” water line on Brumlow Avenue.
There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along E Continental Blvd. and an
existing 12” gravity main on the eastern boundary of the development.
DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is to be captured in the adjacent creek, in lieu of
providing onsite detention. The Development will be modifying the existing
creek and floodplain boundaries with the approval of a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) through FEMA. The creek cross section will be modified
to ensure that adequate capacity is provided for the increase in runoff from
the proposed development.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meeting was held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on February 27, 2024.
This item was heard by the Corridor Planning Committee on May 22, 2023.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 28,
2024.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 5
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA24-0007 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 3/28/24
Project Name: Development Plan – Brumlow East
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Martin Schelling / Curtis Young Wright Brumlow East RE, LLC
1130 N. Carroll Ave. STE 200 Lemoine Wright
Southlake, Texas 76094 601 W. Wall St. Grapevine, TX 76051
Phone: 817-424-2626
Email: cyoung@sage-dfw.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
3/19/2024 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT REAGAN ROTHENBERGER AT (817) 748-8602.
1. The Development Regulations (Zoning Booklet) need the following revisions or considerations:
• I have concerns about not clearly designating a setback for the properties that
have the 40’ pipeline easement encumbrance. Please provide a specific
setback for these lots. It should be clearly stated in as many places as possible
to ensure no confusion in the future between homeowners, permit techs, plans
reviewers, etc. Also, a note must be provided on the Development Plan and
future plat per Sec. 9.6.298 of Ordinance. No. 880, as amended, stating that a
pipeline crosses the property within 100 feet. Furthermore, prior to any approval
of the subdivision, a waiver and hold harmless agreement per Sec. 9.6.299 of
Ordinance. No. 880, as amended, must be executed and recorded in the
County records.
• Parking regulations should match the plans, which calls for 1/400. It should be
noted that warehousing parking requires 1:1000, and so therefore a 1/400
parking requirement for the whole site would not be considered a variation to
the parking requirement.
2. Setbacks should not be measured from easement edges, but rather property boundaries. Lots
24, 23, 49, and 50 need to have setbacks shown correctly from the property boundary.
3. Provide a note on the plan that sidewalks will be provided. No sidewalks are shown, though
Development Regulations require them.
4. There is no dumpster on the plan. Dumpsters may not be located in required buffer yard areas
and may not take up required parking.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 6
The following are informational comments:
• A formal Site Plan application will be required at a future date for the commercial portion. See
Section 47.8 of the Zoning Ordinance for details as to the processing of Development Plans
vs. Site Plans in the “TZD” Transition Zoning District.
• A Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat must be filed for this property, and the entirety of all
properties where boundaries are amended must be part of these plats. This includes land area
outside of the proposed area of development.
• Though the “TZD” Transition Zoning District allows for flexibility, the category does provide
specific guidance for development. The following are notable applicable standards of the
Transition Zoning District regulations found in Section 47.7 that do not appear to be followed:
o The first floor elevation of single-family dwellings shall be raised a minimum of two (2)
feet above the finished level of the public sidewalk/trail in front of the residential
structures. It is unclear if the residential portion meets this requirement.
o The “TZD” District guidance states: “Cul-de-sacs are prohibited unless natural features
such as topography or stream corridors prevent a street connection.” A Cul-de-sac is
shown on the plans.
o The “TZD” District provides guidance for 6’ sidewalks. The applicant proposes 5’
sidewalks for the development.
o It is unknown if the commercial structures will comply with Section 47.7(b) and (c)
regarding building standards and design. Subsection (e) further states, “To ensure
compatibility of building types and to relate new buildings to the building traditions of
the region, architectural design shall be regulated, governed, and enforced through
architectural design standards proposed by the applicant. The applicant shall submit
the proposed standards as a part of the development plan application for all
development in the TZD. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a
recommendation and the City Council shall approve them at the time of approval of the
Development Plan. Architectural design standards for a proposed Transition Zoning
District shall: i. specify the materials and configurations permitted for walls, roofs,
openings, street furniture, and other elements; ii. be based on traditional building
precedents from the region; iii. include the following: a. architectural compatibility
among structures within the neighborhood; b. human scale design; c. pedestrian use of
the entire district; d. relationship to the street, to surrounding buildings, and to adjoining
land uses; and e. special architectural treatment of gateways/civic buildings. This is
presumed to read that the architectural components of the district are to be compatible
with each other. No specific materials are mentioned with this development plan. No
elevation examples of the homes are provided, though not expressly required.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 7
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* If the proposed development was straight zoning it would not comply with the Existing Tree
Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 12.61% of existing
tree cover on the property and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be
preserved. A minimum of 72.14% is proposed to be removed and a maximum of 27.86% is proposed
to be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree
cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the
time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that
must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands,
natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 8
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The planter/planting strip width between the curb and sidewalk within the residential portion of
the proposed development is required to be a minimum six feet (6’) wide in the TZD district. Street
trees are required but is flexible upon the proposed design standards.
2. Provide the interior landscape ground cover and seasonal color calculations within the Interior
Landscape Summary Chart.
3. Existing tree credits seem to be taken for preserved trees within bufferyard areas. Please
provide the proposed existing tree credits within the Bufferyards Summary Chart.
Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of
the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a
Permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
5. Provide at least the minimum required canopy trees for the south bufferyard adjacent to the
residential property. Correct the canopy tree calculations within the Bufferyards Summary Chart.
6. Within the office portion of the development all parking planter islands in parking areas shall
contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover,
ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands which have light poles for lighting the parking
areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree.
* The south bufferyard portion of the proposed office use of the development is proposed to be
a 6’ – F1 bufferyard. The bufferyards regulations of the Zoning Ordinance require the minimum of a
10’ – F1 bufferyard. The proposed dumpster would also be located within the required bufferyard.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 9
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Cul-de-sacs shall have a radius of 60’.
2. Label the radius at the street intersections with Brumlow and Continental, street
centerline radius, and round-a-bout radius.
3. Label fire lane and fire lane radius.
4. Show and label proposed sidewalk. Sidewalk is required along Brumlow frontage and
Continental frontage.
5. Walls within the Pipeline easement shall require approval from the pipeline company.
6. What are the red tick marks on the Development Plan.
7. The northeast commercial building is shown encroaching into the proposed sanitary
sewer easement along the eastern side. The southeast commercial building is also
encroaching into the utility easement. These buildings shall be relocated outside of
the easement.
8. Public Works strongly recommends against the development of Lots 55 and 56 due to
the following:
a. Drainage concerns for both lots
b. Driveway spacing and having a private drive entering onto Continental.
c. At a minimum there needs to be a note that the driveway crossing for lot
55 will be maintained by the property owner. However, we would caution
against this due to future maintenance costs and burden on the
homeowner.
9. Correct the fence key map to reflect a wrought iron privacy fence along the southern
boundary that adjoins to the MSC site.
10. Verify that the driveway spacing along Brumlow to the proposed driveway for the new
MSC development meets minimum separation requirements.
11. Please be aware that when Brumlow is expanded to full build-out, a four lane divided
roadway, there will not be a curb cut for Brumlow East, only the MSC.
* A note shall be added to the plat that specifies the residents shall be made aware that the
Service Center operational hours are 24 hours, 7 days per week and the City’s operations shall not be
impeded.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE:
12. Label the proposed storm drain pipe.
* The drainage area map shall also include the offsite area from the north of Continental that
flows into the channel since the channel is being redefined to ensure there is adequate capacity.
* The proposed drainage channels shall be located within a dedicated drainage easement.
* A LOMR will be required to be approved by FEMA prior to receiving final acceptance of the
Public Works Permit as well as filing the final plat.
UTILITY
* Lot 18 has two water meters shown.
* The waterline serving Lots 55 and 56 shall be located within an easement
* Water meters shall not be located in parking stalls.
* Ensure that the required separation distance is met between water and sewer.
* Ensure that the water line, fire hydrants, and water meters are located within a water
easement for the commercial development.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 10
Fire Department Review
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If
the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault.
Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of
6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room location and indicate size of the riser room)
Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide on the
commercial and residential portions as long as all structures are being protected throughout with
automatic fire suppression systems. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW). (Label the fire lanes on the
plans to ensure that the fire lane indicated on the commercial portion of the plans connects to the
residential street and meets all of the requirements for emergency access)
Fire hydrants are over spaced between the commercial and residential portions of the development,
add an additional fire hydrant near the entrance into the residential area. (Add a fire hydrant as
required)
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA24-0007 Page 11
General Informational Comments
* The Development Review Committee (DRC) has determined this pre-submittal is sufficient for
formal submittal to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to completing the changes noted
above. A pdf of each plan must be submitted by 3/4/2024. If not received before the deadline, the
item will be moved to a later P&Z agenda. If any significant changes, other than those noted
above are made to the submittal, the plan could be withheld from processing until a later meeting
or remanded back to the Development Review Committee for review.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* All development must comply with the standards of the “TZD” Transition Zoning District unless
deviations or variances are otherwise approved as part of a Development Plan or Site Plan.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Note that impact fees will be levied on this project at the time of construction, if approved. No park
dedication is noted. Fees in lieu of dedication will be required. In addition to the City of Southlake
impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of
Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The
City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building
permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and
collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0007 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1 STIVERSON, ELIZABETH SF20A
914 WESTMINSTER
WAY 0.54 NR
2 CAMBRIDGE PLACE HOA INC SF20A
1708 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.24 NR
3 STAERCKE, MARY L SF20A
1011 PINE MEADOW
CT 0.03 NR
4 ISRANI, RISHI SF20A
1013 PINE MEADOW
CT 0.47 NR
5 TREVINO, CARLOS SF20A
1012 PINE MEADOW
CT 0.51 NR
6 AHONEN, KARI SF20A
1010 PINE MEADOW
CT 0.02 NR
7 O'KEEFFE, XIAO SF20A
1019 SOUTH HOLLOW
DR 0.02 NR
8 HOWELL, THOMAS EDWARD SF20A
1021 SOUTH HOLLOW
DR 0.40 NR
9 TWAMLEY, CHRISTIAN SF20A
915 WESTMINSTER
WAY 0.08 NR
10 SOUTH HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS SF20A 1700 E CONTINENTAL 0.15 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0007 Page 2
ASSOC BLVD
11
SOUTH HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS
ASSOC SF20A
1600 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.04 NR
12
GREEN PASTURES PROPERTIES
LLC I1
1857 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.40 NR
13 C & L CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC TZD
1589 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.22 NR
14 HOHENBERGER, ARTHUR TZD 1141 TEALWOOD CT 0.08 NR
15 SHAMSUDDIN, KARIM TZD 1140 TEALWOOD CT 0.22 NR
16
RUTH ANN ADAMS IRREVOCABLE
TRU I1 1204 WOODSEY CT 0.35 NR
17 MARK RICHARD POWELL TRUST MH 1206 WOODSEY CT 0.39 NR
18 WONG, RONALD TZD 1136 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
19 ANDERSON, CASEY L TZD 1137 TEALWOOD CT 0.08 NR
20 AMIN, FURRUKH TZD 1132 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
21 WANG, JEFF C MH 1208 WOODSEY CT 0.37 NR
22 C & L CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC TZD 1130 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
23 DUCEY, CHRISTOPHER TZD 1128 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
24 LEWIS, JERRY TZD 1124 TEALWOOD CT 0.04 NR
25 WANG, JEFF C MH 1210 WOODSEY CT 0.35 NR
26 METROPLEX ACOUSTICAL INC MH 1212 WOODSEY CT 0.39 NR
27 BOYLE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP I1 1604 HART ST 1.35 NR
28 SPORRER, MARLA D MH 1214 WOODSEY CT 0.37 NR
29 SPORRER, MARLA D MH 1216 WOODSEY CT 0.38 NR
30 JACOBSON, RYAN MH 1218 WOODSEY CT 0.36 NR
31 HASSELFELDT REVOCABLE TRUST MH 1220 WOODSEY CT 0.37 NR
32 SOUTHLAKE EXCHANGE LLC SP1 1605 HART ST 2.44 NR
33 HENSON, MICHAEL MH 1222 WOODSEY CT 0.37 NR
34 MATLOCK, JUN SONG MH 1224 WOODSEY CT 0.37 NR
35 SUTINEN, OLLI MH 1226 WOODSEY CT 0.36 NR
36 TCP - HQ LLC SP1 1375 BRUMLOW AVE 0.25 NR
37 HOLZ HOLDINGS LLC SP1 1371 BRUMLOW AVE 0.25 NR
38 SUM AND SAM LLC SP1 1367 BRUMLOW AVE 0.24 NR
39 KNEM LIVING TRUST SP1 1363 BRUMLOW AVE 0.47 NR
40 BLIGHT, PAUL E RPUD
1418 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.05 NR
41 ERNEST, MICHAEL RPUD
1422 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.19 NR
42 GARCIA ATIQUE, JAVIER MH 1228 WOODSEY CT 0.38 NR
43 CCJ PROPERTY MGT LLC SP1 1381 BRUMLOW AVE 0.27 NR
44 SC 1363 BRUMLOW LLC SP1 1385 BRUMLOW AVE 0.35 NR
45 SC 1363 BRUMLOW LLC SP1 1389 BRUMLOW AVE 0.43 NR
46 YONKOSKI, CHRISTIAN RPUD
1426 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.24 NR
47 DACHNIWSKY, OREST MH 1230 WOODSEY CT 0.35 NR
47 DACHNIWSKY, ANN MH 1230 WOODSEY CT 0.35 NR
47 DACHNIWSKY, ANN MH 1230 WOODSEY CT 0.35 NR
48 AREECHIRA, SUBHASH RPUD 1430 MONTGOMERY 0.23 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0007 Page 3
LN
49 NANDISH, RAKESH MH 1232 WOODSEY CT 0.39 NR
50 KUBIK, MARK RPUD
1434 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.26 NR
51 BUSTOS-CANO FAMILY TRUST MH 1234 WOODSEY CT 0.36 NR
52 DAVIS, DONALD E RPUD
1438 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.28 NR
53 AULD, LYNN V MH 1236 WOODSEY CT 0.36 NR
54 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1428 BRUMLOW AVE 0.68 NR
55
WRIGHT MUSTANG BUSINESS
PARK L I1 1800 SH 26 2.51 NR
56 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1540 BRUMLOW AVE 0.92 NR
57 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1640 BRUMLOW AVE 0.55 NR
58 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG
1719 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 2.39 NR
59 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1638 BRUMLOW AVE 1.24 NR
60 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1630 BRUMLOW AVE 1.59 NR
61 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1650 BRUMLOW AVE 0.09 NR
62 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1660 BRUMLOW AVE 0.21 NR
63 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1670 BRUMLOW AVE 0.05 NR
64 ORSER, WILLIAM SF20A
1017 SOUTH HOLLOW
DR 0.46 NR
65 ZAPINSKI, PAUL SF20A
912 WESTMINSTER
WAY 0.47 NR
66 MARCOTULI, RENO J SF20A
913 WESTMINSTER
WAY 0.55 NR
67 KURANI, MOIZ SF20A 1514 SPRUCE CT 0.47 NR
68
SOUTH HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS
ASSOC SF20A
1500 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.13 NR
69 1207 WOODSEY COURT SERIES MH 1207 WOODSEY CT 0.51 NR
70 1209 WOODSEY COURT SERIES MH 1209 WOODSEY CT 0.54 NR
71 DOSSEY, CAROL MH 1211 WOODSEY CT 0.61 NR
71 DHAUBANJAR, NARESH MH 1211 WOODSEY CT 0.61 NR
71 DHAUBANJAR, NARESH MH 1211 WOODSEY CT 0.61 NR
72 COVINGTON, JIM MH 1213 WOODSEY CT 0.47 NR
73 TAYLOR, CLAY M RPUD
1414 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.26 NR
74 YOUSSEF, MEDHAT RPUD
1421 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.27 NR
75 PERRY, DELORIS MH 1229 WOODSEY CT 0.51 NR
76 PITCHER, WILLIAM RPUD
1425 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.30 NR
77 REGALA, LAARNIE MH 1231 WOODSEY CT 0.49 NR
78 SOTO, MICHAEL A RPUD
1429 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.32 NR
79 RAJAJOSHIWALA, PARESH RPUD
1433 MONTGOMERY
LN 0.28 NR
80 CARTLIDGE, BENNY R TZD 1101 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA24-0007 Page 4
81 HSIEH, SUSAN TZD 1105 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
82 BOYLE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP I1 1600 HART ST 0.99 NR
83 MARTIN, CAROL TZD 1120 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 NR
84
SOUTH HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS
ASSOC SF20A
1020 SOUTH HOLLOW
DR 0.02 NR
85 BILLINGSLY, GREG MH 1217 WOODSEY CT 0.46 NR
86 LEE AIR PROPERTIES LLC I1 0.53 NR
87 LEE AIR PROPERTIES LLC I1
1941 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 0.51 NR
88 WRIGHT BRUMLOW WEST RE LLC AG 1700 BRUMLOW AVE 7.68 NR
89 AMERICORP LLC MH 1233 WOODSEY CT 0.52 NR
90 XU, H M MH 1237 WOODSEY CT 0.47 NR
91 GORGI, NAGY MH 1221 WOODSEY CT 0.49 NR
92 LANE HAVEN LLC SP1 1219 BRUMLOW AVE 1.02 NR
93 CX3 PROPERTIES LLC I1 1625 BRUMLOW AVE 2.10 NR
94 1595 HART STREET LLC I1 1595 HART ST 0.99 NR
1000 WRIGHT BRUMLOW EAST RE LLC AG 1535 BRUMLOW AVE 3.47 U
1001 WRIGHT BRUMLOW EAST RE LLC AG 1451 BRUMLOW AVE 5.14 U
1002 WRIGHT BRUMLOW EAST RE LLC AG 1537 BRUMLOW AVE 2.30 U
1003 WRIGHT BRUMLOW EAST RE LLC AG
1719 E CONTINENTAL
BLVD 22.36 U
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: One-hundred and two (102)
Responses Received within 300’: In Favor: Opposed: Undecided: No Response:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-813
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF TRACT 1A, HARRISON
DECKER SURVEY ABSTRACT 438, AND TRACTS 2E04, 2E06
AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2E07A, JOHN N. GIBSON SURVEY
ABSTRACT 591, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 1719 E. CONTINENTAL BLVD. AND
1451 – 1537 BRUMLOW AVE., AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “AG”
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO “TZD” TRANSITIONAL ZONING
DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and
to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 2
District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading
spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on
the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding
of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 3
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed
at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there
has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the
tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally
classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or
tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the
citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare
of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as portions of Tract 1A, Harrison Decker Survey Abstract 438,
and Tracts 2E04, 2E06 and a portion of Tract 2E07A, John N. Gibson Survey
Abstract 591, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1719 E.
Continental Blvd. and 1451 – 1537 Brumlow Ave and more fully and completely
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 4
described in Exhibit “A” from “AG” Agriculture District to “TZD” Transitional Zoning
District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of
land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 5
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that
if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of
said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 6
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required
by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2024.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2024.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as a portion of Tract 1A, Harrison Decker Survey Abstract 438, and Tracts
2E04, 2E06 and a portion of Tract 2E07A, John N. Gibson Survey Abstract 591, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1719 E. Continental Blvd. and 1451 – 1537
Brumlow Ave
Metes and Bounds Description
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment E
ZA24-0007 Page 9
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved Development Plan