03-020ZCP
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 30, 2003
CASE NO: ZA03-020
PROJECT: Chapel Hill Office Park
REQUEST: On behalf of Steve and Dixie Garrett, Realty Capital Corporation is requesting
approval of a zoning change and concept plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing
2. Consider zoning change and concept plan approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Concept Plan Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Bruce Payne (481-2036)
Case No.
ZA03-020
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNERS: Steve and Dixie Garrett
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation
PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to receive approval of zoning and a concept
plan for the development of 9 small office buildings.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 205 East Southlake Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 5F, OW Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” General Site Plan District
HISTORY: There is no development history for this property.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have
130’ of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this road.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have one (1) access directly onto E. Southlake
Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The plan shows common access drives to both the
West and the East giving the site access to S. White Chapel Boulevard and
the future Parkwood Drive.
E. Southlake Boulevard is a 5-lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two-way, center left-turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be
widened to a 7-lane roadway.
May , 2002 traffic counts on E. Southlake Blvd (between White Chapel
Blvd and Byron Nelson Pkwy)
24hr West Bound (WB) (20,959) East Bound (EB) (22,084)
WB Peak A.M. (1,106) 11 – 12 a.m. Peak P.M. (2,217) 5 – 6 p.m.
EB Peak A.M. (2,115) 7 – 8 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,389) 5 – 6 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Case No. Attachment A
ZA03-020 Page 1
Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM-AM-PM-PM-
IN OUT IN OUT
Office 55,100 607 76 10 14 68
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the potential number of vehicle trips
generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard.
WATER & SEWER: A 12” water line extension is proposed from the east side of the future
Parkwood Drive approximately 350’ away. An 8” sewer line extension is
proposed from the west side of Parkwood Drive approximately 250’ away.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 30, 2003.
Under the “S-P-2” site plan district zoning the applicant proposes the
following:
Maximum Impervious Coverage: The overall site shall not exceed 65%
impervious coverage. However, individual lots shall not exceed 80%
impervious coverage.
Bufferyards: Bufferyards along the perimeter site boundary shall adhere
to the requirements of Sections 42 & 43, except that no bufferyards shall
be required along lot lines interior to the site.
Variances are requested for the following:
Stacking Depth: Stacking depth for the proposed drive is required to be
75’. The applicant is showing a stacking depth of 41’.
Driveway Spacing: Driveway spacing is 500’ for full-access drives on
Southlake Blvd (FM 1709). The applicant is showing the nearest drive to
the east 355’ from the proposed driveway.
Street Frontage: All lots must front on a street. The applicant proposes
lots to front on a common access easement.
N:\\Community Development\\WP-FILES\\MEMO\\2003cases\\03-020ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA03-020 Page 2
Case No. Attachment B
ZA03-020 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page 7
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page8
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-020 Page9
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA03-020 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 05/30/03
Project Name: Concept Plan – Chapel Hill Office Park
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation ENGINEER: Baird, Hampton, & Brown, Inc.
Steve Isbell
th
1111 South Main Street, Suite 200 309 W. 7 Street, Suite 500
Grapevine, TX 76051 Fort Worth, TX 76102
Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 338-1277
Fax: (817) 424-2448 Fax: (817) 338-9245
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/19/03 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
1. This site must comply with the “S-P-2” zoning district regulations as approved. The following
differences from the regulations of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 are proposed as
part of the “S-P-2” regulations:
a) The maximum impervious coverage permitted for the “O-1” Office District zoning is 65%.
The applicant proposes that the overall site shall not exceed 65% impervious coverage except
that individual lots within the site boundary shall not exceed 80% impervious coverage.
b) Bufferyards are required along all interior lot lines. The applicant proposes that bufferyards
shall be provided along the perimeter of the site boundary except that no bufferyards shall be
required along lot lines interior to the site boundary.
2. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways:
a) Stacking depth for the proposed drive is required to be 75’. The applicant is showing a
stacking depth of 41’. (A variance has been requested.)
b) Driveway spacing is 500’ for full-access drives on Southlake Blvd (FM 1709). The
applicant is showing the nearest drive to the east 355’ from the proposed driveway. (A
variance has been requested.)
3. Every lot shall abut on a public street or a private street. This concept plan proposes lots to front on
a common access easement built to fire lane standards. (A variance has been requested.)
4. A reciprocal parking agreement must be executed, reviewed by the City and filed of record (copy of
filed instrument provided to the City) prior to issuance of a building permit for any portion of this
site reliant upon the off-site parking for compliance with the parking requirements. The applicant
proposes the use and construction of off-site parking to comply with parking requirements.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA03-020 Page 1
5. Clearly identify the fire lanes on the site. The fire lanes do not follow the layout of all common
access easements. A separate method of identification should be used.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building
plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not
be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap
Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* This review is based on the “O-1” Zoning District Regulations.
* This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by
Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43, Part III “Residential Adjacency Standards” as well as the Corridor
Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is
provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to
submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are
only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance
with all site plan requirements:
• Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No.
557, as amended.
• Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended
• Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d,
Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
• Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance
No. 480, as amended.
• Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA03-020 Page 2
• Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA03-020 Page 3
Surrounding Property Owners
Chapel Hill Office Park
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
1. GCSW, Ltd 1. O1 1. Office Commercial 1. 0.98
2. D. Stoner 2. SF1A 2. Low Density Residential 2. 1.04
3. S. Bryant 3. SF1A 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.00
4. D. Johnston 4. SF1A 4. Low Density Residential 4. 0.91
5. S. Faulkner 5. SF1A 5. Low Density Residential 5. 0.94
6. St. of Texas 6. SF1A 6. Low Density Residential 6. 0.02
7. St. of Texas 7. SF1A 7. Low Density Residential 7. 0.16
8. St. of Texas 8. SF1A 8. Low Density Residential 8. 0.18
9. St. of Texas 9. SF1A 9. Low Density Residential 9. 0.54
10. Bes-Tex Financial Serv. 10. SP2 10. Low Density Residential 10. 5.91
11. White Chapel United 11. CS 11. Public/Semi Public 11. 6.32
Methodist
12. White Chapel United 12. CS 12. Public/Semi Public 12. 9.50
Methodist
13. White Chapel United 13. CS 13. Public/Semi Public 13. 0.79
Methodist
14. S. Garrett 14. AG 14. Low Density Residential 14. 3.69
Case No. Attachment E
ZA03-020 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Chapel Hill Office Park
Notices Sent: Nine (9)
Responses: None
Case No. Attachment F
ZA03-020 Page 1