Item 6D - PresentationCITY VF
SOUTHL,4
Item 6D - ZA23-0049
Constellation Site Plan
ZA23-0049
W
- .�
40
w01
j
Ts P
Aerial
Future Land Use
North View from Ira E Woods Ave
Ida` ��ds Ave
rt Intersection��v
100'+ Setback from Residential
-TLH LINE
SEE SHEET C1.01
P.,
RrF�
�.5
10
%
PARKING ANALYSIS CHART
PROPOSED
PROPOSED USE PARKING REQ'D
AREA jSF}
RATIO SPACES
BUILDING 1:
BUILD I NG AREA: 134,401
OFFICE AREA: 13,450
1:300
44.8
WARHOUSE AREA' 220.951
111000
121 0
BUILDING 2:
'
BUILDI NG AREA: 188,132
OFFICE AREA: 18,820
1:300
62.7
WAREHOUSE AREA: 169,312
1:1000
169.3
BUILDING 3:
BUILDI NG AREA: 107,957
OFFICE AREA! 1U,300
1:300
34.3
WAREHDUSEAREA: 92,657
1:1000
92.7
BUILINDG 4:
D
BUILDI NG AREA:
120,940
OFFICE AREA:
12,100
1:300
40.3
WAREHDUSEAREA:
108,740
1:]A001
1087
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:
$74
PARKING PROVIDED:
HANDICAP PARKING REQUIRED:
689
14
HANDICAP PARKING PROVIDED: 20
SUMMARY CHART -SITE DATA
EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING
12
12
LAND USE DESIGNATION
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
GROWNET ACREAGE
1,468,218 5F (3311 AC)
1,466,218 5F (3331 AC)
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS
6
1
SITE COVERAGE (°I)
45,85%
77.51%
AREA OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SF (9 }
673,157 SF (45.90f.)
1,139,047 SF (77.51%)
AREA OF OPEN SPACE SFf (°rf)
795,061 SF (54.15%)
330,171 SF (2L49%)
TOTAL B U I L DI N G/FLOOR AREA
N/A
546,330 SF
NUMBER OF STORIES
N/A
1
BUILDING HEIGHT(S)
N/A
35 FT
REQUIRED LOADING SPACES
N/A
28
PROVIDED LOADING SPACES
N/A
121
SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPECANOPY
OF AREA IN
ACCENT
GROUND
SEASONAL
AREA
FRONT OR
TREES
TREES
SHRUBS
COVE R(SF)
COLOR (SF)
SIDE
REQUIRED
81,950 SF
75%
164
3.28
2,049
12,293
1,640
PROVIDED
148.500 SF
7SIX
190
3.62
2,215
19,049
1,800
Building 1 (NW) Elevations
Building 2 (SW) Elevations
Building 3 (NE) Elevations
Building 4 (SE) Elevations
irm
Now',
Northwest View
aw�
� 90W f lcv—
Lo�—L�� -
Northeast View
Entrance View
told
ME
Wall Detail
told
ME
Wall Detail
� I �
�s
k
S I SOUTHLAKE LAND-MAGELLAN
77,77.77
O
01110
5 U M MARY CHART - I NTE RIDR LAN OSCAPE
LANDSCAPE
% DF AREA I N
CANOPY
ACCENT
GROUND
SEASONAL
AREA
FRONT DR
TREES
TREES
SHRUBS
COVER(SF)
COLOR (Sr)
SIDE
REQUIRED
32,950 SF
75%
164
32S
2,049
12,293
2.540
PROVIDED
148.500 SF
75%
190
368
2,215
19,049
1,800
• - JF
f� VLXD000�
.....,...WAS
/ a
Detention
Area
Landscape Plan
\ \ W
� a
o
\ Y
MR
T -
- --
®fx� �11fEECCfSERVA71CN Af14LYS'S - I��py
y� SffIY
LO.00 �„:
There is approximately 22.95%
of existing tree cover on the
property and a minimum of
60% is required to be
preserved per Tree
Preservation Ordinance No.
585-E. A variance is requested
to allow 0% of the existing
tree cover to be preserved.
The City Council may authorize a variance to any provision of this Ordinance following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Commission. A request for a variance to any provision in this Ordinance shall be accompanied by a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree
Conservation Plan as outlined in Article 6, or other documentation requested by the Administrative Official, and the following factors shall be
considered in evaluating the variance request:
i. Whether a literal enforcement of the Ordinance will create an undue hardship or an unreasonable practical difficulty on the applicant;
ii. Whether the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed;
iii. Whether a reasonable accommodation or alternative solution can be made to accomplish the desired activity without the alteration of
the tree;
iv. Whether the variance will injure or be wholly compatible with the use and future or existing development of adjacent properties;
V. Whether the increased development costs caused by preserving the tree create an undue hardship on the development of the site;
vi. Whether there is any identified adverse effect of the alteration or preservation on erosion, soil moisture retention, flow of surface water,
and drainage systems;
vii. Whether there is any substantial impact to the buffering of residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of non-residential
uses;
viii. Whether costs versus the benefits of relocating required utility service infrastructure and easements based on preservation or alteration
of protected trees;
ix. Whether the proposed tree replacement procedures adequately mitigate the alteration of the tree; �, „`������ x�j✓� j
X. Whether the alteration adversely affects the public health, safety or welfare; and �'t/i[,
xi. Whether the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this Ordinance to the greatest degree reasonably
possible. I , .. 1 1, 1 11 . „ - ,
For:
Opposed: -
Undecided:
Within 300'
NEN--D
I �I
CITY VF
SOUTHL,4
Questions?