Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1997-08-05 CC Packet
City of Southlake, Texas 110 MEMORANDUM August 1. 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting August 5, 1997 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Request to advertise for bids for the community stage for the Park and Recreation Department. The FY 96-97 budget included funds in the "park improvement" line item for a large stage. The estimated cost included in the budget was 411) $25,000. Staff is requesting your permission to solicit bids for the stage. This will be a customized, portable stage which may be used for any community event at any location in the city. Staff is developing the specifications to ensure that the stage is large enough, and appropriate, for use by the Lake Cities Community Band. 2. Agenda Item No 5B. Commercial Developer Agreement for Carroll ISD No. 2. 7-8-9 Grade Secondary School Located on the West Side of North White Chapel Boulevard. approximately 200' North of the Intersection of Chapel Downs and North White Chapel Boulevard. You will note that CISD is requesting waivers for many of the fees required for this project. This is not an unreasonable request, since we have waived fees for them with prior projects. The only concern is related to the park fees. As noted in the memo from Ron Harper, utilizing school facilities as joint use facilities was discussed at length during the zoning process. Neighbors expressed concern about the volume of participants utilizing the facilities during non-school hours and the lighting that would be needed for evening • activities. The Planning & Zoning Commission concurred that there should be no joint Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 2 use facilities at this site. CISD also indicated that they did not feel that the nature of the athletic improvements were conducive to joint use, since they were being built at a senior high school level. Thus, it is our belief that there will not be joint use facilities on this site. If there are possibilities, they have not yet been discussed with staff, the Park Board, JUC or Council. You may waive the park fees, but the language in the developer's agreement intimates that we will have joint use privileges on the site. One alternative you may wish to consider is recognizing joint use facilities at other sites as a means of granting the request to waive fees. We have had situations in the past where credits were granted based on amenities or dedications at other sites, i.e., sites which are not part of the project, when there was evidence that the developer had exceeded park dedication requirements for the original • project. This occurred with the Country Walk developer's agreement, when Timberlake "transferred" credit. 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for the Village at Timarron, Phase I. This is a standard developers agreement with only one minor modification. This change concerns responsibility for maintenance of all "aesthetic or specialty items" within the development. Normally the agreement includes a clause which transfers such responsibility to the homeowners association. This statement has been removed from this agreement. Staff has recommended that the Mayor be authorized to enter into this developer agreement. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorization to advertise for bids for a 12-inch water line along, the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard from Dove Street to the existing Kirkwood Boulevard, and enter into an agreement with MTP/IBM for the 12-inch water line. The background • for this item was included as a discussion item in your June Retreat materials, and a copy has been included in your packet with this item as a refresher. We hope to have the agreement with MTP/IBM for you on Tuesday. In the event we do not, we would still Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 3 like to proceed with advertising for bids in order to get this project underway. As unlikely as it is, if we still do not have an agreement worked out by the time the bids are received, which will still be 21-30 days after advertising, we can wait up to 60 days from bid opening to award a contract. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Bob. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Resolution 97-57. Appointment of Barry Friedman as SPIN Neighborhood #13 Representative. The resignation of Jim Goggin left an opening for SPIN Neighborhood #13, so a letter was sent to all residents of the neighborhood requesting volunteers and notifying them of the meeting to select a new representative. Barry Friedman was ultimately selected to take this position. He is very enthusiastic about serving, and has already spent time with staff touring city facilities and learning more about the role and responsibility he will take on as a representative. Staff recommends • appointment of Mr. Friedman based on the results of the neighborhood meeting. 6. Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 480-247. 2nd Reading. ZA 97-074. Rezoning of 485 acres from AG to NR-PUD (Solana). There have been no changes since Council approval of the first reading (7-0). Feel free to contact Karen Gandy regarding this request. Given some of the misleading newspaper articles which have appeared, it seemed important for me to provide you with clarification on the issue of the temporary restraining order sought by Scott Bradley and the Westlake aldermen to stop Southlake from-engaging in further activity related to Solana. Contrary to reports, no T.R.O. has been issued. Earlier this week, Judge McGrath issued an opinion letter (attached) which essentially stated that he ought to issue the T.R.O. He invited Westlake to draft the order, which • they were happy to do. The order was comprehensive, basically alleging that the City of Southlake was trespassing and that Westlake does not want us there for any reason at any Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 4 time. Please see the draft order attached to this memo. As you can see, the order drafted by Westlake is strongly worded. All of this occurred very quickly, and a "strategy meeting" was hastily called by our attorneys to discuss the city's options. Mayor Stacy and Deputy Mayor Pro Tern David Harris (Mayor Pro Tem Evans was unavailable) and I met Thursday afternoon to discuss this issue. During our discussions we observed that if the T.R.O. were issued as drafted by Westlake, we would not be permitted to provide any services to Solana, including E.M.S. and fire. As such, MTP would be required to shut down the Marriott and would lose insurance coverage on their high rise buildings because we are the only feasible option for providing • these services. Trophy Club cannot provide protection for a variety of reasons, including 1) they only have two paid staff on duty during business hours and rely on volunteers at night and on the weekends, and 2) they do not have the appropriate equipment to provide protection to high rise buildings (aerial ladder trucks, for example). As you can imagine, this is of great concern to the MTP attorneys who recognize the major economic loss which could be suffered by MTP under these circumstances. MTP attorneys sent a direct letter to the judge expressing their concerns and the implications of such an order. Judge McGrath called Allen Taylor to discuss the issue and following their conversation, called a meeting for Monday afternoon with the attorneys to figure out what kind of restraining order would be appropriate. (Note: this is an "attorneys only" meeting.) To stress the point, there is currently no T.R.O. As such, we are moving forward with MTP's zoning case. If the judge has not issued the order by Tuesday evening, we will act. • If he has, we will table the item and Solana will operate in a non-conforming status. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 5 There is some good news in all of this. The evidentiary hearing for summary judgement on the Westlake issue (consolidated cases) has been moved up from August 25 to Saturday, August 9. We believe this is good news because, one way or the other, it will move the cases out of Judge McGrath's court. Anyone who wishes to attend the August 9 hearing may, and should, attend. 7. Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-241, 2nd Reading. ZA 97-034. Rezoning of 320 W. Highland (Seaborn). No changes have occurred since the first reading of this ordinance which Council approved with a (7-0) vote. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy if you have any questions regarding this application. 8. Agenda Item No. 7C. ZA 97-068. Site Plan for an Emergency Animal Hospital. The • Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) with the stipulation that the applicant meet all the articulation requirements. They have revised their building design since P&Z and are very close to meeting the articulation requirements, although technically they are not there yet. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions. 9. Agenda Item No. 7D. Ordinance No. 480-248. 2nd Reading. ZA 97-080, Rezoning of Lot 2. Block 1. Baker Estates. No changes have occurred since the first reading of this ordinance which Council approved with a (7-0) vote. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy if you have any questions regarding this application. 10. Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 480-246, 2nd Reading. ZA 97-055. Rezoning 5.63 acres from AG to 0-1 (Stonecrest).There are no unresolved issues regarding this request although there is a supermajority vote requirement for approval due to the opposition 410 from property owners to the west. City Council did approve the first reading of this request 5-0. The applicant has employed Rick Wilhelm to prepare adequate deed restrictions to meet the needs of the adjacent property owners. In your packet is a letter Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 6 from Mr. Wilhelm summarizing their efforts to satisfy the property owners, as well as their draft of the proposed deed restrictions. Apparently the property owners are still providing him feedback and they are unsure as to when they will get all issues resolved. It was their desire to meet the direction given from Council during the last meeting and get the restrictions filed before the meeting Tuesday night. Feel free to contact Greg Last or Karen Gandy if you have any questions regarding this request. 11. Agenda Item No. 7F. Ordinance No. 480-249, 1st Reading, ZA 97-083, Rezoning and Concept Plan for T.W. King Water Storage Tank and Telecommunications Tower/Antennas. This item addresses the City's property on T.W. King Road. The site will be utilized by Southlake's Departments of Public Works and Public Safety and by Denton County. Public Works will construct an elevated (165') 1.5 million gallon water • tower on this site. Denton County plans to construct a 380', lattice-type, telecommunications tower, atop which Public Safety will locate their 800 MHZ radio transmitter antennas. As you will recall, in April the Council authorized the interlocal agreement between Denton County and the City of Southlake for this joint use tower/antenna project. This new system will provide the city (and other cities in the area) with improved communications coverage and will eliminate the need for continuing the current arrangement with the City of Fort Worth which is currently providing less than satisfactory coverage. Costs are also an issue with our Fort Worth arrangement. In reviewing this case, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) of the rezoning and concept plan with the elevated water tower at 165' as shown, waiving the bufferyard/landscape areas and the screening requirements due to the heavy vegetation in the area. P&Z limited the height of the telecommunications tower to 120' (although Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy reminded them of the zoning ordinance provision 4110 which exempts governmental communications structures/ antennas from height restrictions). The Commission expressed great concern about the close proximity of the tower to residences in the area and the impact a tower of the proposed height would have Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 7 should it fall. Public Safety staff would like to emphasize the greater risk of missed emergency calls due to less than satisfactory coverage under the current arrangement with Fort Worth or the impact of the reduced height on the new tower's coverage area. Feel free to contact Billy Campbell or Johnny Knight regarding the communication tower. Bob Whitehead regarding the elevated water storage tank, or Karen Gandy with any questions on this application. Note that Director Campbell and Deputy Director Knight will be available at Monday's lunch meeting to discuss this with you. 12. Agenda Item No. 7G. Resolution No. 97-55, ZA 97-084, SUP for T.W. King Telecommunication Tower. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved (7-0) the request with the same motion as the rezoning case above and with the same noted concerns. Feel free to contact Billy Campbell, Johnny Knight, or Karen Gandy with any • questions on this application. 13. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 97-086, Revised Concept plan for Southlake Woods and Stoneburv. You may recall that during Council's evaluation of the Southlake Woods rezoning and concept plan. the Council gave the developer directions to try and pursue a secondary access point at the north end of their development. The developer has accomplished this by acquiring the previously platted Stonebury subdivision. The purpose of this item and 97-087 (Preliminary Plat) and 97-088 (Plat Revision) is to provide a connection between the two developments at the northwest corner of Stonebury. It is also their desire to show an amenity center along the north property line of the development. There are no unresolved issues related to either of these requests. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0-1 subject to the Staff Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions. • 14. Agenda Item No. 7I. ZA 97-087, Revised Preliminary Plat for Southlake Woods and Stonebury. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0-1 subject to the Staff Review Summary Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 8 with the modification noted in the review. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions. 15. Agenda Item No. 7J. ZA 97-088, Plat Revision for Stonebury. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0-1 subject to the Staff Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions. 16. Agenda Item No. 7K. ZA 97-065, Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Wyndsor Creek. Phase II. Various staff members (Bob Whitehead, Billy Campbell, Greg Last, and Bruce Mueller, Fire Marshall) have met with the applicant to discuss alternative solutions to concerns raised about emergency access to this area. Public Safety staff feel that it • would be beneficial to have a second emergency access to the loop street north of this property although this could be accomplished through an easement rather than a full public street. Recall that the developer did mitigate the access concerns for the previous phase of development by providing a wider road at the creek crossing. The applicant has agreed to provide an emergency access easement with engineered support sufficient for emergency apparatus access from this project to the existing north project. The applicant does not wish to provide a full street connection east to Carroll from the cul- de-sac but is receptive to providing emergency access via an easement and "grass-crete" or similar construction which meets the technical requirements (minimum 65,000 lb load capacity) of Public Safety while maintaining a more aesthetic appearance than typical paving would provide. Public Safety staff discussed alternative options and believe this proposal satisfies their needs. • These provisions for emergency access do not change the technical comment regarding the number of lots on a cul-de-sac. Following is an excerpt from the subdivision ordinance where this comment originates. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 9 "Cul-de-Sacs: Generally, a maximum number of twenty (20) dwelling units should be permitted on a cul-de-sac street permanently designed as such. Additionally, the length of the Cul-de-sac should not exceed 1,000 feet or be less than 150 feet in length. However, density of development, topography, lot sizes and other significant factors will be weighed in determining the length of a cul-de-sac street." Note that this requirement is worded less strictly than some of our other ordinance provisions and was intended to allow some discretionary evaluation based on the variables noted. We are aware that there is likely to be a contingent of people from the properties to the north at the meeting to request that the street connection not be made to their loop street. If the applicant must meet the 20 lot maximum requirement, it is their desire to connect the road to the north rather than to Carroll because they feel that would severely • impact the quality of those lots due to "cut-through" traffic. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-2-1 with the comments noted on the staff report and in the review. Feel free to contact Billy Campbell, Greg Last or Dennis Killough regarding this request. 17. Agenda Item No. 8A. ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition. Wyndsor Creek, Phase II. Basically the same issues are involved in this application. Feel free to contact Billy Campbell, Greg Last or Dennis Killough regarding this request. • 18. Agenda Item No. 8B. Ordinance No. 480-Z, Gasoline Service Station Ordinance. As you are aware, the moratorium for this use (along the F.M. 1709 corridor) is in effect until September 28, 1997 pending approval of this ordinance. Included in your packet is the current draft of Ordinance 480-Z which reflects the efforts of the Planning and Zoning • Commission as well as the Service Station Workgroup. The Commission recommended approval with a (7-0) vote. With the adoption of this ordinance, service stations would be permitted only by a specific use permit in the "C-3" General Commercial District. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 10 Sites along the F.M. 1709 corridor would be permitted only at signalized arterial intersections. Attached to Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy's memorandum is an exhibit which indicates the Commission's recommended intersections along the F.M. 1709 corridor. Sites along S.H. 114 and along F.M. 1938 were not limited as to location. During the discussion of this ordinance, several legal issues were raised by the City Attorney's office which are described in Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy's memorandum. I feel these are topics that the City Attorney should discuss further with you in executive session. Following their motion on this ordinance, the Commission further recommended to the Council that such issues as noise, lighting, and roof design be reviewed as soon as possible, either as amendments to the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations or with the • adoption of a neighborhood preservation or residential adjacency ordinance. They also recommended that a sign ordinance amendment be considered to address readerboard signs as they relate to "replaceable pricing" signs used by service stations. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy if you have any questions regarding this request. 19. Agenda Item No. 8C. Ordinance No. 480-250, 1st Reading, ZA 97-090. Rezoning 3.32 acres AG to SF-1A. There are no unresolved issues on this request. The Land Use Map indicates Low Density Residential for this area. Note that no concept plan is required with this request. The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 7-0. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy if you have any questions. 20. Agenda Item No. 8D. Preliminary Plat for proposed Lots 1 and 2. Higgins Addition. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 7-0. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have • any questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 11 21. Agenda Item No. 8E. Ordinance No. 681. 1st Reading. street name change for a portion of Stonebury Drive from Lot 1 to Lot 8 and extending through Lot 9 of Block 2 in Stonebury Addition to Indian Paintbrush Way. The memo from Bob Whitehead describes the name change request and is related to items 7H, 7I, and 7J above. There are no unresolved issues with this request. Council may want to consider placing this item on the consent agenda if you have no questions regarding the name change. 22. Agenda Item No. 8F. Ordinance No. 682. 1st Reading. Reinvestment Zone Number One. City of Southlake. We are proceeding on schedule with the creation of the Reinvestment Zone. In addition to the drafting of this ordinance, dates have been set to formally present the Reinvestment Zone Project and Financing Plan to the Commissioner's Court, the Hospital District Board, and the TCJC District Board. These presentations will be held • over the next two weeks, and following these meetings, the entities will determine if they are interested in participating in the Reinvestment Zone. We have heard various and contradictory stories concerning the school's interest in participating. It has been made clear to them that they must adhere to the established timeframe. All of the overlapping taxing jurisdictions must inform us of their interest prior to the second reading of the ordinance scheduled for the August 26 City Council meeting. We have discussed this concept at length. If you are comfortable doing so, this item could be placed on consent agenda for first reading. 23. Agenda Item No. 10A. Award of bid for the slurry grouting of the pipe bedding and repair of concrete street pavement in Tiniarron. Phase I. At the request of City Council • at the July 15 meeting, this item was tabled to the August 5 City Council meeting. As noted in my July 15 agenda memo: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 12 Early in the life of the pavement in the Bent Creek area of Timarron and other new subdivisions, distress in the form of excessive settlement, cracking, and faulting began to occur and become progressively worse. Some pavement areas were removed and replaced. Widespread pavement failures continued in non-repaired areas, and limited distress occurred in some of the repaired areas. Because of the widespread failures, the City of Southlake retained Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. to perform an engineering investigation to document the extent of the distress, determine the cause or causes, and to develop recommendations for addressing the Bent Creek problem, as well as future street construction issues. • A report of their findings was presented to the City Council on June 11, 1996, which included conclusions about possible causes (including infiltration of native soil through gravel bedding, heavy construction traffic), recommendations for the Bent Creek area (including filling the voids with an injection of slurry grout), and recommendations for future subdivision street construction(including using better materials for backfill, use of filter fabric, moving sewer lines to behind the curb, and addressing pavement thickness in design standards). During the discussion, Council decided to pursue a trial slurry grouting procedure in some of the areas•in Bent Creek to determine if this method was indeed the best option for taking care of the problem. When the report documenting the results of the trial grouting process was • presented, the results indicated that slurry grouting could be used as an effective means for filling the voids in the bedding material. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 13 At that time, an article in the Fort Worth Star Telegram told the story of sinking streets in this area. Grapevine and Colleyville experienced similar problems and asked us for our consultant's report. Throughout this period, the Council discussed options for not only making appropriate repairs, but for funding these repairs as well. While Council hoped to secure funding assistance from the developer and/or contractor, the decision was made to place funds in the budget for repairs. As noted in the memo from Bob Whitehead. we received two bids for this project. The low bid exceeds the amount budgeted. but funds are available from street maintenance. • 24. Agenda Item No. IOB. Requested variances to the Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Burger King located at 2025 West Southlake Boulevard in Southlake Market Place, Phase II. As noted in Bob Whitehead's memo, if Council grants the requested variances to the sign ordinance, the total sign area will still be significantly less than the total allowable area for attached signs. If you have no concerns with this item, you may want to consider placing it on the consent agenda. 25. Agenda Item No. 10C. Requested Variances to Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Wendy's located at 2130 E. Southlake Boulevard in Village Center, Phase I. This sign variance request. submitted by Wendy's, seeks approval for an additional attached sign to be permitted on the east side of the building facing the driveway entrance to the Village Shopping Center. The applicant is entitled to one attached sign per street frontage, however the applicant claims the entrance to the shopping center functions as a street and • thus should be considered a street with respect to the sign ordinance. The sign ordinance allows 71 square feet on the front (South) elevation. If this request were approved, there Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 14 would be two signs with a total area of 44 square feet. Again, if you have no concerns, this may be a potential item to be moved to consent agenda. 26. Agenda Item No. 10D. Rejection of all bids for reconstruction improvements of Dove Street; direct staff to advertise for bids for the revised West Dove Street reconstruction. The memo from City Engineer Ron Harper explains the problem with this bid and the potential options for resolving this issue. You will note that we do not have the option of accepting the low bidder's offer to accept the contract by simply tripling the bid item for the box culvert. This would amount to contract negotiation which is in violation of state bid requirements. It is staff's recommendation to reject the bids and readvertise. This will amount to a delay • of approximately 4-5 weeks but is not a significant impact. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ron. If Council decides on which option it favors in the work session, you may want to place this item on the Consent agenda. 27. Agenda Item No. 11A. Charter Amendment Election. At the May 27th Council Meeting, discussions were held about possibly holding a special election on August 9th for Charter amendments. The Council Committee, consisting of Mayor Stacy and Councilmembers Harris and Evans, presented some of their recommendations to the Council at that time. However, it was decided not to hold the election in August, but postpone it until the November 4 election. • Mayor Stacy asked that this item be placed on the agenda as a reminder of the upcoming election. He also wanted to provide Council with an opportunity to review the proposed changes and make suggestions to the Council Committee. The proposed charter • amendments are attached to Sandy LeGrand's memo discussing this issue. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 15 28. Agenda Item No. 11B. Pitched Roof Regulations. This item was placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Fawks. As he mentions in his memorandum, the pitched roof issue continues to come up in ordinance discussions (i.e., personal care facilities and service stations). Attached to Karen Gandy's memorandum is a copy of Bedford's overlay district regulations dealing with pitched roof construction along this corridor. Karen summarizes Bedford's requirements in her memo. Feel free to contact her regarding this request. 29. Agenda Item No. 11C. Impervious Coverage Ordinance. This item was placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Fawks. His memorandum reflects the Impervious Coverage work group's recommendations. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy has drafted Ordinance No. 480-BB based on these recommendations. Feel free to contact her 1111 regarding this request. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 30. Status of Sidewalk Ordinance - FYI, the Park Board has completed its review of the proposed sidewalk ordinance. Ron Harper is working to incorporate changes made and is consulting our attorneys for their review. We anticipate that the ordinance will move forward to the Planning & Zoning Commission for review at their August 21 meeting. 31. REMINDER: Bob Jones Park Ground Breaking Scheduled for August 8 - You should have received your invitation by now. Don't forget that it starts at 9:00 a.m. at Bob Jones Park. 32. Strategic Plan Meeting - We are planning to meet with the Council Committee for the • Strategic Plan at 3:30 p.m. on August 19 (note that we have moved the meeting to an earlier time in an effort to ensure adequate time with the consultant). The meeting will be held in the small conference room at City Hall. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1. 1997 Page 16 Note: Please make sure to return your questionnaire to the consultant as soon as possible. If you need another envelope or a fax number for Dr. Glass, please feel free to call Kim Bush. 33. SPIN Update. Residents from various neighborhoods in SPIN #13 met July 29 to choose their Representative to the SPIN Standing Committee. Mr. Barry Friedman of Myers Meadows was selected as their representative. A resolution has been drafted to approve his appointment and is consent item #5E on this agenda. SPIN held its first joint meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 24th. This meeting, attended by all members of the Commission, was felt to be very beneficial • by the SPIN representatives in attendance. The draft of the minutes of that meeting are included in your packet. 34. Kaleidoscope of Homes VIP Party. The Builders Association of Fort Worth and Tarrant County will host a VIP "preview" as part of the tenth annual Kaleidoscope of Homes tour that is being held August 23 - September 21 in Southlake. The VIP party is Thursday, August 21, 7:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m., in the Cambridge Place addition. The Builders Association is offering 50 free VIP tickets to the City of Southlake (valued at $25.00 each) and 100 free general admission passes to the tour. Although there is a value to the tickets, it is my opinion that it is appropriate for you to attend. First, Kaleidoscope will be bringing thousands of people into the City. I believe your presence would be an enhancement to the event, which essentially promotes our City. Also, it is important to note that the event is not being sponsored by any one developer or builder. Rather, a large number of them are involved in this project. The VIP tickets include the tour, dinner, • libations, entertainment, and awards program. The expected attendance is 1200+. Please contact Sandy LeGrand before August 15, to reserve tickets. Tracy Southers, Public Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 17 Information Officer, is serving on the steering committee and can answer any additional questions. 35. FBT Spinoff. Note the letter from Allen Taylor dated July 30, 1997. Fielding, Barrett, and Taylor have created a new firm Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. As mentioned in their letter, all the associates we work with on a daily basis are partners or associates in this new firm, and the new firm will still remain as partners in FBT. 36. Westlake Bankruptcy Hearing Update. There has been significant activity in the Westlake saga since the last Council meeting. Judge McGuire dismissed the Westlake bankruptcy claim last Friday, July 26. This ruling was significant because it discredits the fraudulent transfer argument in Westlake's State Court case. It is anticipated that Westlake will • appeal this ruling. If so, we will appeal the "good faith" finding. 37. SPIN/TIRZ Meetings. Last week three public presentations were made concerning the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone. Councilmember Harris. Rick Wilhelm, and I made a brief presentation at the Chamber Luncheon on July 28. Although time was limited, I felt it was a valuable opportunity to present the information to our business community. SPIN sponsored two meetings to discuss the Reinvestment Zone with the community and to address their questions and concerns. There were approximately ten to fifteen citizens at each meeting. At each meeting a brief presentation was made, and then it was opened up for Q&A. There were the anticipated concerns about the stadium, citizen participation, and implications for the school. However, I believe overall, there is growing understanding and support for the Reinvestment Zone. • 38. Budget Work Session Schedule. We have reserved a room at Solana for our budget work sessions. These sessions are scheduled for Tuesday through Thursday, August 12-14, beginning at 5:00 p.m. each evening. It is also my intent to use the Monday lunch Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 18 meeting on August 11 to answer any budget questions or concerns you may have. Please let me know early what your questions are, and I will have the appropriate department director(s) available also. 39. Land Use Plan Kickoff Meeting. A kickoff meeting to generally describe the update process and introduce the staff and consultants to the public, will be held on August 28. This meeting will be similar in nature to the kickoff meeting held for the Master Thoroughfare Plan Update. 40. McKean Issue with Lake Drive width. In your last packet, I enclosed a copy of the letter I wrote to the McKeans regarding Lake Drive improvements. In the letter I referred to Lake Drive being reconstructed to "the standard 50' neighborhood street cross-section." • My office received a number of calls from residents complaining that they did not want 50 feet of pavement. We explained to them that the 50' cross-section was actually 22' of pavement, and 28' of right of way. (At present, the actual pavement width of Lake Drive varies from 16 to 18 feet.) We bring this to your attention in case you have received any telephone calls. FYI, some of the residents have indicated that they do not want the street widened from 16 feet to 22 feet. The 50' ROW is already reserved and it is our judgement that the standard street width would be safer for residents and motorists on that street. 41. Advancements in Community Development. There have been two promotional advancements within the Community Development Department. Chris Carpenter has been promoted to fill the lead planner position in comprehensive planning to fill the position left vacant by Tom Elgin. Stephanie Sarakaitis (Zoning Assistant currently) has been promoted to Planner I in Comprehensive planning to fill Chris' position. Both Chris and Stephanie have provided the city with exceptional service and we look forward to their • continued efforts within the department in their advanced positions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1. 1997 Page 19 42. Sutton Place Sewer Connection. You may be contacted by residents within Sutton Place regarding some confusion on the CDBG grant providing sanitary sewer to their subdivision. The confusion revolves around whether or not the grant will include the actual connection of the houses to the public sewer line. During the preparation of the grant application, it was staff's understanding, based on confirmations from the county, that in fact these house connections would be eligible. This is what we represented to the citizens in that area based on that understanding. It now appears that the residents may in fact have to go through another process to receive funding for those connections and further, that some of the individual lot owners may not qualify for the connections. We do not have all the answers at this time but are continuing to research the issue. I just thought you might want to be aware of the issue in case somebody calls you. Feel free to contact Greg Last or Bob Whitehead if you have any questions. • 43. Update on West Beach Lot Acquisitions. We are proceeding as planned. The attorneys have sent final offer letters and so far most of the property owners are accepting the offers. One exception at this point is Bobby Graybill. Mr. Graybill has a mobile home on two lots in the southern portion of the addition. He has refused our final offer of $23,950, so we are proceeding with condemnation. The condemnation hearing is scheduled for August 21 at 10:30 a.m. in the City Council Chamber. Additional negotiations were necessary on the Patrick property (trucking company). Dee Ekstrom and I met with Anna Patrick, her son and daughter on Saturday, July 26, and extended an offer for an additional $5,000 if they would remove all materials, debris and improvements etc. They agreed and a contract has been mailed to them. The Ghost Riders property, owned by Rodney Cullars, is scheduled to close next week. • We hope to have an updated map to you by Tuesday night. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 20 44. The Star-Telegram article on P&Z Chairperson Joe Wright was misleading and in some cases, factually erroneous. It is upsetting to me for a number of reasons, which I'll touch on later, but primarily because I spoke to Marisa Taylor when she called me in reference to her article and she chose to disregard comments which would have placed the entire situation in a more appropriate light. More than that, though, are other questions the whole episode has raised which I believe potentially place the City in a precarious situation concerning past, present, and future development "controversies." I will first address the Joe Wright issue as reported. Then I will address the spin-off issue, which involves P&Z Commissioner Debra Edmondson. Regarding the newspaper article by Marisa Taylor, note the legal opinion I requested from • Wayne Olson based upon a letter sent to our attorneys from Marisa, which Wayne faxed to me. I requested WKO to write the opinion due to the questions Marisa raised. Both Marisa Taylor's letter and WKO's opinion are attached hereto. I will not go into any lengthy details of the article, since the WKO opinion addresses most of it. However, I will point out that by awarding the eleven (11) contracts to Wright Construction (since 1990, but covering the period 6/15/87 to 3/31/97, the former date being how far back our computer records go, the latter date being when Marisa first inquired of me about Joe Wright), the City saved more than$500,000 just in the difference between his low bid and the next lowest bid. Also, it is my guess that we were probably saved time (when it was sometimes crucial) by having the good fortune to have a local contractor receive the low bid award. A good example is the award of the low bid to Aledo Construction for the S-2 sewer. • Aledo was, as I recall better than $100,000 lower than Wright Construction. After all the legal entanglements were over with Aledo Construction, and the delays to the S-2 sewer, the City wound up paying much more than the difference between their low bid and Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • August 1, 1997 Page 21 Wright's bid. Two other things I will point out: Wright Construction has been the low bidder on two (2) projects since our Ethics Ordinance was passed; the S-6 contract on which Marisa reported, was specifically bid as a combined project. All bidders were aware including Dual Construction. There were many extenuating circumstances which I told to Marisa, but she chose to ignore this information. The S-6/N-3 was one project that eventually involved the C.I.S.D., thus the need for change order, and the need to avoid the state substantially fining or shutting down the schools due to inadequate sanitary sewer facilities. Since it was so complicated, she chose to ignore it. For the same reason, I'll not expand here. (It would take at least six (6) pages itself.) The issue with Commissioner Wright raised an issue involving Commissioner Edmondson, potentially damaging, but which can be corrected. It has to do with comments that she has • made from time-to-time concerning City Council actions vis-a-vis P&Z actions. There are several examples that I have heard (for example, comments concerning the P&Z denial and City Council approval of the Tetco service station at FM1709 and Peytonville Road) which would ordinarily be no different than any other board member expressing dissatisfaction with a City Council decision. It is not an uncommon practice, and I would imagine that those of you who were previously on the P&Z or some other City board or committee probably at some time or other made similar comments. It is in fact probably to be expected in our system. Where her comments become worrisome is when she talks about P&Z members not having to follow the law. She made a like comment in a recent P&Z executive session when the attorney was advising P&Z on the City's legal restrictions concerning site plans and plats. She said something to the effect that "...sometimes you have to forget about the law and do what the citizens want." (Not an exact quote, but a close paraphrase; I wasn't taking notes.) At the time, I made an analogous reference to get her to look at it differently, but didn't lecture her. The attorney also tried to avoid any • criticism of her remark while pointing out the consequences of P&Z action and the need to follow legal precedent. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 41) August 1. 1997 Page 22 Several recent events have brought this issue to fore which has prompted my mention to you. One is the controversy created with the Joe Wright article in the Star-Telegram. Another is the recent (July 17, 1997) decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit concerning the Cinemark lawsuits in Dallas (see attached). The third is comments made by Commissioner Edmondson at the July 24, 1997 Joint SPIN/P&Z meeting (which has been picked up by the reporter from the Grapevine Sun in following up on the Star- Telegram's Joe Wright article). In the Joe Wright article, Commissioner Edmondson raises questions about legalities and ethics concerning his decisions. In the open meeting with SPIN/P&Z on July 24 Commissioner Edmondson and Commissioner Wright stated major differences of opinion on whether or not P&Z has a responsibility to follow the law when making decisions on • items before the Commission. Note the third paragraph on page 3 of the minutes of the meeting. That is what the Grapevine Sun reporter, Raymon Fullerton, came by to ask me about this day. I attempted to low-key her comments, because of the obvious legal implications. He also had a copy of a 1994 attorney general's opinion (also attached) which says that P&Z Commissioners, in cities that have adopted the provision of "...the Local Government Code that requires an affirmative vote of at least three-forths of the entire City Council to overrule a recommendation of denial by the commission,...exercise responsibilities, beyond those that are advisory in nature." Also, he was aware that the oath of office taken by City Council and P&Z members in Southlake includes "...and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and Laws of the Untied States of America and of this State and the Charter and Ordinances of the City." I declined to respond to questions regarding Joe Wright and Debra Edmondson (including did I ask the attorneys for a legal opinion as to whether or not intentionally ignoring her oath of office is grounds for removal), other than stating that I believe neither would • knowingly disregard their legal or ethical obligations. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest SAugust 1, 1997 Page 23 This controversy is not good for the City of Southlake. Perhaps just as important is the potential liabilities to the City from any number of scenarios that could be drawn from intentionally disregarding the law. Someone needs to talk to Commissioner Edmondson. If you would like, I will. Perhaps it would be best to have a special executive session with P&Z and our attorneys concerning all of the P&Z's potential liabilities both individually, and for the City. This is something we need to address in Executive Session Tuesday night. 45. Proposed FY97-98 Annual Budget. The budget letter and summaries are included in your packet. Per Charter requirements, the budget has been filed with the City Secretary. Please consider this a "first draft" of the budget, as we will go through it with you in detail during the budget work sessions and will clarify as we do. Additionally, I will be • going through the proposed budget with staff next week to be sure I haven't overlooked something given all the other distractions. I am sure you can all understand that our plates are extremely full these days -- please forgive any minor mistakes! CE • = - = Cityof Southlake uthlo a Administrative Offices August 1, 1997 Mayor: pick Stacy Mayor Prorern: i Honorable Mayor Stacy and r.1 r�� I taw IL J N.Ralph Evans Members of City Council Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: OFFICE OF CITY L'U PamelaA.Muller City of Southlake SECRETARY Councilrnembers: 1725 East Southlake Boulevard Wayne Moffat David A.Harris Southlake, Texas 76092 .nary gawks Scott F.Martin City Manager: Dear Mayor and Members of City Council: Curtis E.Hawk Assistant City Manager: ShanaK.Yelverton In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the SaCil eGrand City of Southlake, the proposed Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1997 and ending September 30, 1998 is submitted for your consideration. The budget as filed with the City Secretary presents in summary form the revenues and expenditures for each of the City's funds. Also included is a schedule of new requests as well as a Capital Projects Summary. We will begin to discuss the budget and its details with the City Council at work sessions scheduled for August 12, 13, and 14, 1997 and will formally present the budget for consideration during regular Council meetings in late August and early September. The proposed budget incorporates a tax rate of $.4220 per $100.00 property valuation, which holds the tax rate steady from the previous year's budget. This will mark the seventh consecutive year with no tax rate increase. • The FY97-98 proposed budget reflects a total taxable value of$1,550,350,213, an increase of$240,915,255 (15.53%) over the final 1996 taxable value. The 1725 East Southlake Blvd. • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 2 1997 taxable value reflects $188,608,957 in new improvements since last year. Of the budget tax rate of$.4220 per $100 valuation, $.24739 is for general operations and $.17461 is for debt service. State law requires a taxing unit to calculate three rates after receiving its certified appraisal roll -- the effective tax rate, the rollback tax rate and the notice-and-hearing rate. The effective tax rate is the rate that will generate the same amount of property tax dollars as the previous year, excluding new construction, when the two years are compared. The other two calculations are used to ascertain the course a city must take in notifying the public of its intentions. Depending on the ultimate tax rate that is chosen by the City and its relationship to the notice-and-hearing and rollback rates, there are requirements that must be followed to comply with the law. These requirements protect the • public's right-to-know concerning the real implication of tax rate decisions. The calculated effective tax rate of$.40749 for the 1997 tax year is up from the $.39034 rate from last year. The proposed FY97-98 tax rate of $.4220 exceeds the notice-and-hearing limit rate of $.41971. Since the proposed tax rate exceeds this amount, the City must publish a notice as required by State of Texas "Truth-In-Taxation" laws, and hold a public hearing to discuss the proposed tax increase, even though the tax rate will remain the same. The rollback rate is $.43493. The proposed FY97-98 Annual Budget presents in financial terms the plan for the accomplishment of municipal objectives during the forthcoming fiscal year. The budget preparation requires a comparison of the anticipated revenues with proposed programs, and establishment of priorities are based on service • demands or prior commitments to projects. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 3 FUND SUMMARIES In all operating funds, the proposed FY97-98 Annual Budget projects expenditures of S24.439.390. These expenditures are accounted for in six separate funds: General Fund. General Obligation Debt Service Fund, Utility Fund, Special Revenue - Parks/Recreation Fund, Southlake Parks Development Corporation (SPDC) Operations Fund, and the SPDC Debt Service Fund. The General Fund and the General Obligation Debt Service Fund together account for the distribution of the expenditures of the revenue generated by the proposed S.4220 tax rate. In addition, the City Council will consider a Capital Projects Budget, separate from the operating budget, which will provide funding for the City's major • capital projects. Revenues for this fund are available from a variety of sources, such as operating fund transfers, from the issuance of bonds, or from developer contributions. The funds may be used for capital improvements, primarily for streets, drainage, water and wastewater improvements and to purchase land. Actual construction of capital projects may overlap fiscal years, therefore a five- year Capital Projects Program Summary, included as a part of the FY97-98 Annual Budget, highlights the major projects to considered by the Council. This budget does not take into account budget amounts for the proposed tax increment financing district (TIF), nor the proposed crime control and prevention district sales tax. General Fund Summary The General Fund supports all municipal operations with the exception of water • and wastewater utility operations and the operations of the SPDC. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 4 Revenues The proposed FY97-98 Annual Budget projects S10,976.299 in General Fund revenues, which is an increase of S2,005,751 or 23.6% from the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. The largest single revenue source in the proposed budget is the ad valorem (property) tax. The budget as proposed will provide $4,036,234 ad valorem tax for the General Fund maintenance and operations budget, an estimated increase of$679,022 or 23.1% from the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. The second largest General Fund revenue source projected in the FY97-98 budget is the municipal sales tax. Over the past several years, the City has experienced double digit growth in sales tax receipts. Based upon current collections, the sales tax revenue for the 96-97 fiscal year has been revised to an • estimated $2,101,800. This is $253,300, or 13.7% over the projected receipts which were included in the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. For FY97-98, staff is projecting collections at $2,717,500. This is an anticipated increase of approximately 29% over the FY96-97 revised estimates, primarily due to a full year of collections for the Home Depot store that opened in late May 1997. The third largest General Fund revenue source in the proposed budget is derived from the municipal permits and fees charged for various development activities, such as fees for zoning, platting and building permits. The proposed budget projects revenues of $2,264,710 from this source in FY97-98. This represents an increase of $15,400 or .6% over the projection included in the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. The City is projecting that 600 single family residential building permits will be issued, the same number estimated for FY96-97. Revenues from commercial permits reflects an increase of $50,000 • over amounts for FY96-97 due to the expected increase in commercial building activity. Projected revenues for platting, public works inspections and engineering plan reviews have been reduced, due primarily to the reduced Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 5 number of residential subdivisions processed during the previous fiscal year. Staff does not anticipate that the number of residential projects will increase substantially for FY97-98. The proposed budget does not reflect any fee increases. The other major revenue sources for the General Fund are franchise fees ($801,030) from the private utility companies operating in the City, municipal fines ($515,300), and transfers ($700,000) into the General Fund from the Utility Fund. Franchise fees are expected to increase $167,133 or 33.0% from the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. while revenues from fines are expected to increase $161,700 or 37.0% over the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. Charges for services are estimated at $372,550, which is an increase of$92,700 • or 41.9% over FY96-97 Adopted. This category of revenue includes interlocal contributions for the joint Teen Court program ($43,500), funds from Carroll Independent School District for the D.A.R.E. program ($25,000), grant funds for the community oriented policing services ($25,000), and fees received from recreation classes ($250,000) and ambulance transport fees ($18,750). The City continues to experience significant growth in its recreation class participation. Miscellaneous income is projected at $113,975, an increase of$8,796 or 6.8% over last year's adopted budget. The proposed budget reflects $155,000 in interest earnings. Expenditures • The proposed General Fund budget estimates $13,866,719 in expenditures to accomplish municipal objectives. The proposed expenditures represent an increase of$3,287,492 or 31.1% over the current year. This reflects a full Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 6 year's funding for the seven (7) positions added at mid-year FY96-97, plus funds needed to address next year's increased service demands. The most significant increase in the General Fund budget is in Public Safety (S1.195.835, +27.0%). Two (2) positions added at mid-year FY96-97 are reflected for the entire year, plus $1,012,142 in equipment and vehicles are included. Six (6) new positions are proposed. The General Government Department increased $847,409, (+45.8%), with the most significant increase in Support Services ($540,441; +51.8%). A new city-wide telephone system is proposed, plus funding for a city-wide wireless computer network for remote data terminals. Funding is proposed for leasing additional office space. A new division, Community Services, consolidates functions previously administered through the City Manager's Office and Support Services, such as the Public Information Office, Southlake's City newsletter, service groups such as Southlake Youth • Action Commission, and the Senior Advisory Commission. The Public Works Department is proposed to increase by $471,564, (+22.7%). Parks and Recreation is projecting an increase in expenditures of $470,609 (+49.4%). These increases are primarily attributable to proposed vehicles and equipment necessary to continue the current level of service and to begin addressing the expanding park and recreational facilities and programs. Personnel Highlights The proposed budget includes $150,000, reflected separately as a lump-sum number and not within the individual divisions, to implement the pay plan recommended as a result of a comprehensive job description and market analysis. The adjustment is proposed for a January 1 effective date. The proposed General Fund budget projects an increase of ten (10) full time regular • positions in FY97-98. These positions are needed to enable the City to provide effective management of service demands. The positions are: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 7 • One (1) Education/Prevention Officer (Fire Services) • One (1) Police Detective • Three (3) Public Safety Officers • One (1) Public Safety Support Technician • One (1) Building Inspector • One (1) GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Analyst • One (1) Building Maintenance Worker (Parks/Recreation) • One (1) Planner Other Expenditure Highlights • S 45,000 Additional lease space for office personnel • $243,942 Fire vehicles and equipment • • S200,000 City-wide telephone system • $130,000 Wireless computer network for remote data terminals • $115,000 Parks and Recreation vehicles and equipment • $ 78,000 Streets and Drainage vehicles and equipment • $312,763 Police vehicles • $ 15,000 Corridor Study, design implementation • $ 43,443 GIS Software • $ 48,000 Building Inspection vehicles Fund Balance The proposed budget reflects a slight decrease in the undesignated Fund Balance, with a projected beginning of$2,680,735 (19.71% balance) and an ending balance at an estimated $2,080,315. The estimated ending Fund Balance • represents 15.00% of estimated expenditures, within the 15% minimum but less than the 25% established by the City Council as the maximum target level in the City's Fund Balance Policy. The proposed level is sufficient to ensure the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 111 Page 8 fund's financial integrity. Tax Rate The proposed budget reflects a proposed tax rate of$.4220 per $100 valuation. of which $.24739 is for general operations and maintenance and $.17461 is for debt service. Utility Fund The Utility Fund revenues are projected at S7,570,600 for an increase of S 1,233,950 or 19.5% in the proposed budget compared with the adopted FY96- 97 budget. Expenses are projected at $7,421,862 for an increase of$864,744 • or 13.3% over the FY96-97 Adopted Budget. The proposed budget does not include any increase in water or sewer rates. The proposed budget includes an estimated $534,993 in new requests, including $128,368 for six (6) new personnel and $406,625 in new capital equipment. Special Revenue Fund - Parks and Recreation The proposed budget includes the special revenue fund to account for revenues and expenditures dedicated for park use. These funds are derived from the Park Dedication Fees charged to new development. The proposed budget reflects revenues of$50,000 in park dedication fees from developers, and $3,465 in interest income for total revenues of$53,465. The proposed budget anticipates a beginning fund balance of$19,689. There is $53,594 budgeted as a transfer to the G.O. Debt Service Fund for payment on notes executed to purchase 17 • acres to expand Bob Jones Park. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 1, 1997 • Page 9 Southlake Parks Development Corporation The SPDC is projected to receive $1.357,500 in sales tax revenue and S41,250 in interest earnings. Expenditures are projected at S47,014. including funding_ for the Parks Project Planning Superintendent. SPDC debt service for FY97-98 is projected at $653,812, an increase of $308,042 over FY96-97 due to the additional sales tax revenue bonds sold in the Spring of 1997. SLMIMIARY AND CONCLUSION The proposed budget represents progress toward a proactive approach to the operation of the City of Southlake. The scheduled capital improvements, equipment purchases, and additional personnel provide the framework for • addressing the service needs of the community. for anticipated growth t Planning P and improvement of municipal service delivery drives the budget process. Sincerely, • Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/lah • Attachments L\FlNANCE\97988UD\978DLT81.WPD CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Budget Message All Funds Summary 1 All Funds Summary. By Division 2 General Fund Summary 3 Debt Service Fund Summary 4 Utility Fund Summary 5 Special Revenue Fund Summary 6 SPDC Operating Fund Summary 7 SPDC Debt Service Fund Summary 8 All Funds Summary, Expenditures, By Fund/Category 9 All Funds Summary, Expenditures, By Fund/Division/Category 10-12 Schedule of New Requests 13-16 • Schedule of Unfunded Needs 17-18 Capital Projects Summary 19-23 • I PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 S ALL FUNDS SUMMARY Special Revenue General Debt Service Utility Parks/ Fund Fund Fund Recreation SPDC Total Projected Revenues-FY97-98 $10,976,299 $2,809,281 $7,570,600 $53,465 $1,399,025 $22,808,670 Less Projected Expenditures 3'3,866,719 32,449,983 37,421,862 30 3700,326 S24,439,390 "rai-Eccencitures-FY97-98 $13,866,719 $2.449,983 $7,421,862 $0 $700,826 $24,439,390 C O Proceeds 31,590.000 SO SO $0 SO Si 590,000 Net Transfers 'n ;(0ut) $700,_0.00 (338.777 $134 14.5 L53 594) Q 3541.774 Net Revenues L$6QQ 420i 1120.521 $282,883 (,$129) f98.199 3.501.054 Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital 9/30/97 S2,680,735 S607,556 $2,942,059 $19,689 $774,229 $7,024,268 Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital 9/30/98 $2,080,315 S728,077 $3,224,942 S19,560 $1,472,428 $7,525,322 1996-97 1996-97 1997-98 $ Increase/ 1995-96 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) % Increase/ Expenditures Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted -Decrease General Fund P sonnet $4,781,025 $6,075,068 $6,219,939 $7,546,544 $1,471,476 24.2% tions $2,707,550 $3,363,706 $3,511,848 $4,664,921 1,301,215 38.7% al Outlay $677,982 $1,140,453 $1,238,874 $1,505,254 364,801 32.0% Pay Plan Implementation IQ $D $150,000 150.000 100.0% Total Expenditures 38,166,557 S10.579,227 $10,970,661 $13,866,719 $3,287,492 31.1% Debt Service Fund Debt Service $1,490.094 $1,683.946 $1,687,446 $2,449,983 $766,037 45.5% Total Expenditures $1,490,094 $1,683,946 $1,687,446 $2,449,983 $766,037 45.5% Utility Fund Personnel $582,751 $590,250 $539,079 $752,102 $161,852 27.4% Operations $4,215,240 $3,867,100 $2,880,381 $3,908,145 41,045 1.1% Capital Outlay $525,678 $651,720 $659,970 $687,125 35,405 5.4% Debt Service $824,132 $1,448,048 $1,448,048 $2,062,490 614,442 42.4% Pay Plan Implementation 5 $ $12,000 12.000 100.0% Total Expenses $6,147,801 $6,557,118 $5,577,478 $7,421,862 $864,744 13.2% Special Revenue-Parks/Recreation Operations $48,597 $0 $11,133 $0 $0 -100.0% Capital Outlay 5161,263 $122,000 $55,000 5 (122.000) -100.0% Total Expenditures $209,859 $122,000 $66,133 $0 ($122,000) -100.0% SPDC Personnel $46,920 S50,229 $50,229 346,314 ($3,915) -7.8% IPbons $4,805 $4,800 $4,800 $0 (4,800) 100.0% IOutlay $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% ervice $378,601 $345,770 $652,329 $653,812 308,042 89.1% Pay Plan Implementation $0 U0 $0 $700 700 100.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $430,326 $400,799 $707,358 $700,826 $300,027 74.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $16.444.638 $19 343 090 $19.009.076 $24 439.390 $5.096.300 26.3% • ALL FUNDS SUMMARY 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget 3715'M ate+dwn.M 38701,97 S ncreasei 3 rcrease7 '995-;6 1996-97 1996-97 . (Decrease) %Increase/ 1997-98 (Decrease) %increase/ REVENUES actual Adopted_ Revised Adopted -Decrease Proposed Adcetec -Decrease 4 a'crer--axes 34 -'9 35?C6 5.56 35 572 556 S66:CC 2% S6 8C9 765 3' _.3 2'29 _ Sacs-3x 94C 5CC 3.151 300 38C 3CC 13 ", 4 075,000 1 3C3 5CC 47 ;°, =-3":^Se:ems 50; -54 ._-: ' 929.237 295 340 46.% 601 030 1E7 133 25 4% -res 435 S8F, 353 5CC 513.7CC 16C 1C0 45 3°, 515 3CC 15' ':C 45 7 a r3r;s'cr.Se _es __ 1C3 _ 7_.. 163 35C 34:CC 3C 2°1, 372.55C 92 '_C 33•'o =er.T 1s,Fees 2-65 298 2 349 310 2.268,010 (81 300 -3 5% 2.314 710 (34 500): -1 5% yl.sceilaneous 265.180 191,379, 251,451 i 60,372 31 6% 205,575. 14 496• 7 6% WatefSal.Yrestttental 4,367.522. 4.250.000' 4,250,0001 0' 0.0%`, 4,887,500', 637,500 150% l Hater Sales-commercai 576,519 475,CC0 i 610,000 135.000 i 28.4%; 701,500; 226,500, 47 7%, Wastewater Sales 680,936• 590.000 800,000 210,000 i 35 6% 920,000; 330.000 I 55.9%; Sanitation Sales 448 336 5C8:co 475,000; (33 0001 -6 5% 534,000 25 000 5 1% Ctner:;ttldy Charges 439 275 359:CO 359.000 0 0 0% 359.000 0 0 0% erest:^come 344 171 7:CQ 347 300 `C'CC 16 9% 312 74Q '-G 5 3% Total Revenues S17.948.534 S18.664.792 319.991 904 S1.327.112 7.1% 522.808.67Q 54.143.878 22.2% E22( E_NDITURES City Secretary 3255 958 3253 253 $224,577 (S38.6761 -14.7% 3237,312 (S25 941)1 -9 9%' Human Resources 0 96.0'0 135,999; 39.989 00% 168,488. 72,478 1000% City Manager 432.524, 446 3C2; 505,3581 59.056 13 2% 346,620' (99,682)1 -22.3% Services 981,311 1,045,160: 1,261,277 216,117 20.7%i 1.585,601 i 540,441 51.7% ity Services Q Q Q 4 0.0% 360 1131 I II 360 113 100 0% G ral Gov Total $1.669.793 $1.850,725 52.127.211i 5276,486 14.9% $2.698.134! 5847.409' 45.8% Finance 350,664 381 591 • 423,576! 41.985 11.0% 410,436! 28.345' 76%' Municipal Court 206.229 219 320' 260,651 40,831 18.6% 277,205 57.385 26.1%' 7een Court 38 585 52.20; 50.647 j (1 5591 -3.0% 54,609 2.403 4.6% Finance Total 635.478 653.617 734.874 81.257 12.4% 742 250 88.633' 13.6% Fire 901,925 1,342.2664 1,379.162! 36.898 2.7% 1621,694 279 430,. 208% Police 1,389,060, 2,147.850 2,210,622! 62,772 2.9%` 2,929,622 781 772 36.4%' Public Safety Support 835 717 935 952 947.363! 11.411 i 1 2%I 1.070.585 i 134 833! 14 4%i Public Safety Total S3.126.702. $4426.066I 54.537.147 5111.081 i 2.5% S5.621.901 i $1,195.835 27.0% Building Inspections 351,228 453,6134 i 509,950 56,346 j 12 4%I 579,419 125,815' 27 7% Streets/Drainage I 871,0381 896.918 900,793 3,875 0 a%' 934.629 37,711 4 2% Public Works Admin 360,338 I 723,488 612,678 (110,810 -15.3% 1,031,526 308.038 42.6% Water ! 4,051,453,' 3,856,197• 2,903,051 (953.146)1 -24.7%1 4,044,105, 187.908j 4.9% Wastewater • 978,360 744.873: 760,379 15,506: 2.1%! 803,267I 58,394; 78%' Sanitation 393 855 508 CCQ I 466.000, (42.("C0y -8.3% 500 000; r8 2CC11 -1 6% Public Works Total S6.906.273 S7.183.080 56.152.851! (S1.030.229) -14.3% 57.892.946, $709,866•- 9.9% Parks and Recreation 885.558 1.129.799 1.085.774 (44.0251 -3.9%. 1.469.693' 339.894 30.1% Community Development 417 495 507:57!' 488,664 (18,493N -3.6% 571,196, 64 039' 12.6% Economic Develooment 110 511 114 383 5g7?, -0.5% 96.a..2 7• (194..a 5`i -16 1 w° 11428�; Community Dev.Total 5528.006 $622.039 $585,091 (536.9481 -5.9%. 5685.481; 563.442, 10.2% Pay Plan Implementation 0 0 SO i 0 0 S162,700' 162.700 100.0% Debt Service 2 692 827: 3,477 764 i 3.787.823' 310 059 8 9% 5.166 285 1 688 521' 48 6% Total Expenditures 516,444.637 519.343.09Q 519.010.771 (5332.319) -1.7% $24 439 39_6 55.096.300 26.3% Net Revenues 51.503.901 (5678.2981 5981.133 51.659.431 151.630.7201 c o Saie,Other $88,1C9 S920 3CC S842,184 (S77.8161 51.590,000( 3670.000 31293.000 S1,732.315 $1,767,815'' 535,000 S2,666,413'; S933.598• Transfers Out (S2 589 2461 1 1 4 (S2 244.418i $Q i (5505.2211i Total Other Sources(uses) (S1 208 137y $1 033 397 S365.581 I S9 131 774 $$1 098 377' 9egetmq tuna Balance S5,381,791 I' S5,677,55511I 85,677,555 S7,024,268 Reserved Fuld Bayne $0 I SDI t $0 ( SD Ending F�'na Balance $5 677 555' IM.R.37 554; 57 024'6$ $75253y21 3 • GENERAL FUND 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget 071S PIA anndsten rt4 oel01N7 S.ncreaser S rcreasei '995.96 1996-97 1996-97 (Decrease: 't Increase; 1 997-98 Decrease) %!ncreaser REVENUES Actual Adopted _ Revised Aoopted _Decrease Proposed 3cocted _-Decrease ,a:-.en,-axes 32 939 363 33 357"' 53 385 212 528:CC . 3% 34 036 234 5 79 322 23'- - a Saes-3x ' 479 586 ' 348 5C0 2.101 800 253?CC 13 7% 2 717 50C 369:CC 58-% :.3 .-de=ees 5C6 75 533 357 929 237 295 340 46 5'a 801.030 '67 133 33 2% =vas 436 586 353 6C0 513.700 16C'CC 45 3% 515 3C0 161 700 37:'S .r Ser.ces 2:1 13 2-9 350 36.35G 34:CC 3C 2 s 372 55C ._ :C ^ 9% Re-.tsPees 2 542 353 2 249 310 2 215.010 (34 3CC). . e 2.264 710 15 aC0 .3% M,scedareous 129.3C0 105.179. 158,751 53.572 50 9% 113,975 8 796 6 a% Interest'ncome !• 145 810 43.1000 155 000 12.000 �8 4%` 155.000' 1 ! 8 2% Total Revenues $8,501,860 $8,970,548 $9,822,560' 5852,012 9.5%' $10,976,299 $2,005,751 23.6% EXPENDITURES ' I t,Secretary 5255.958 S263.253 224.577; (538.676)1 -14 7%• 5237,312 ($25.941)I -9 9% 3-Resources 0 96.010 135.999, 39,989 0 3% 168,488 72,478: 10G 0% .'a ager 432,524 446.302 505.358 59,256 13 2% 346.620 (99,682)1 22 3.eer _,.7._cr.Services 981 311 1 345 160' 1 261,277 216,117 2C 7% 1,585.601 540,441 51 7% O;,r•rr..rav Services 0 Q Q P 'J J.0 360.113 360 az 1CO 2% General Gov Total $1.669,7_13 $1,850.725 52.127.211 $276.486 14.9% 52.698.134 $847.409 45.8% =rarce 390.664 381 591' 423,576 41,985 11 0%. 410,436 28,845 7 6% Vunic:cal Court 206.229 219.820 260,651 40.831 185% 277,205. 57,385' 26 1% lipurt i 38 585 52 708 50.647 (1 5591 3 0%I 54 609 2 403 I 4 6% Total $635.478 1553.617 ;734.874! S81.257 12.4%; $742,250 i .ffi43I 13.6% 901,925 1,342.264 1,379,162� 36,898 2.7% 1,621,694 279,430. 208% Dol ce 1.389.060 2.147,850 2.210.622` 62,772 2.3%: 2,929.622 781.772 36.4% R.:ciic Safety Support 835 717 935<952 947 363: 11 411 1 2% 1 070 585. 134.633 14.4% Public Safety Total $3.126.702 $4.426.066 $4,537,147: ;111.081 2.5% $5.621.901 51,195.835 27.0% Building Inspections 351,228 453,604 509.950! 56.346 12 4% 579,419 125 815' 27 7% Streets/Drainage 871.038 896.918 900.793 3,875 0 4% 934,629 37.711 4.2% Public Works Admin 360 338 723 488 612.8751 (110 8101 -15.3% 1 031 526 308.038 42.6% Public Works Total 51,582,604I $2.074.010 52.023.421 I =MI -2.4%I $2.545.574 I 5471.564 I 22.7% Parks and Recreation $623,974 $952,770 5962.917 ;10.147 1.1%j $1.423.379 $474.609 49.4% Community Development 417,495 507,157 488,664 (18,493' -3.6% 57 i,196 64,0.i5 12.6%; Economic Development 110 511 114_882 96-427 -16.1% 111285! (597 -0.5%' Community Dev.Total $528.006 i 5622.039 $585,091 I (536,948 -3.9% S685.481 IIEL442 10.2%! Pay Plan Implementation 54' $4' 1_0: Q' 0.0%: $150.000' 150000. 100.0% Total Expenditures 58,166,557 510,579,227 $10,970,661 S391,434 3.7%' $13,866,719 $3,287,492 31.1% Net Revenues ;335.303 ($1.608.679y 151.148.101y 5460.57 4 152.894.4201 ($3.225.723y• Proceeds tom C.O.Sale/Other 588.109 5920,000 $842,184 (577.8161 51.590,000 Transfers n 594 606 633.000 633,0001 0 700,000 Transfers cut (5377.2871 gQ 22 $Q K • Total Other Sources(uses) I S305 425' S1 553 000 I $1 475'84 I ($77 8161 42 290 OOQ 3e;mmng,r.nd 3aan<e • S1.712,922 52.353,653: 52,353.653: 52,680,735 a 3aiance 050 '3aunce $2 353 653 C2 297 974 ;2 680 731 52 O80 31`t I Fund vane percentage-c!V 28 82% 21.72%I 24.44%I i 15.00% I i Li • DEBT SERVICE FUND 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget f11,5 iv Jmdsan+,Ms4 OR/Of.B- S Increase/ S:ncrease/ '995-36 1996-97 1996-97 (Decrease) • %increase/ 1997-98 Decrease', %'ncrease, REVENt1E5 actual Adopted Revised Adcpted -Decrease Proposed Adccted -Decrease -1:: ,aicrem razes S' 728 543 S2 249 344 52.287 344 538.000 1 7% 52.773.531 5524 187 23 3% _es1 ncome 4_ d 35'SQ 55:GC 19 25C 53 3e6 35 7 5Q 3 0 3% Total Revenues $1,786,441 S2,285,094 $2,342,344 $57,250 2.5% $2,809,281 $524,187 22.9% EXPENDITURES -•rc:cai 39C8.6C0 5947.350, S947.350 S01 0.0% 51.092.350: 5145,000: 15 3% interest 5579.194 5734,0961 5734,096; 0I 0.0%C $1,351,633 617,5371 841% Admm Expenses $2 300 $2<M Z-QQQ' 2 500 i 140 0%f 5§-QQQ i y Q; 140 0% Total Expenditures $1,490,094 $1,683,946 $1,687,446 $3,500; 0.2%, $2,449,983l $766,037'; 45.5% Net Revenues 1296.347 1601.148 5654"898 ;53.75Q 1359.298 (S241.8501 Transfers'n 67.519 56.875 56875 480,45E Transfer ON (251 203A (584 773)i -584773 (719 233N row omen Sources/fuses) (183 884)1 (527.398)I (527.898(4 (238,777( riegevenq Fule nd Balance ! $367,893' 5480,55E $480,556 $607,556: aaunce i $480 SSP , M i $607 55@ 1 $728 077' i i • 0 S • UTILITY FUND 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget 07 IS PIA aM+awn.ka 0140 tro7 S Irtcrease/ 3;ncrease/ 1995-96 1996-97 1996-97 (Cecrease) %Increase/ 1997-98 (Cecrease) %Increase/ REVENUES actual Adopted Revised Aeccted -Cecrease Proposed Adocted .Cecrease .-ads S' _74C 565 :CO 591.500 55'CC 6 6% 591.600 55 7C0 :5% esr come _ 29 68 750 75.000 6 250 9 i% 77 CCC 3 250 _ . ..ate,>a es-'esocenhae 4 367 522 4 254::CO 4.250.000 0 0 0% 4.387.500 537 5C0 15 0% ..later 3aies-c^-rnmerc:m 576 819 4-5 200 510.000 135 200 28 4% 701.5C0 226.500 47 7% Saes 580 036 590:CC 300,200 210:CC 35.5% 920.000 330.000 55 a% Sar ttat4n Sales 448 336 5C8:CO 475.000 (.33.0CC) -6 5% 534 000 26 CCO 5 1% Cther„t:ty charges 439 275 359_ CO SX14 0 0.0% 189 000 0 0 0% Total Revenues $6,726,057 S6,336,550 1 $6,660,600; $323,950' 5.1% S7.570,600: $1,233,950 i 19.5% EXPENSES i I Debtsernce-Rererw(Bones 824,132 1,448.048 i 1,448,048 0 0.0% 2.062.490 614,442 42 4%! yv31er 4.051 453 3 356 197': 2,903,051; (953.1461 -24.7% 4.044,105 187 908 4 9%' Sewer 878,360 744 373 760,379 i 15.506 2.1% 803.267 58.394 7 3% Saritat.cn 393.355 5C8:CO j 466,000: (42,000)1 -8.3%, 30,0QQ, (i,�,011 •1 6% Pay Plan,mplemertation 1 0, 0 j 0 0.0% 12.000' 12,000 1C0 0% Total Expenses S6,147.801 S6.557.118 ;5,577.478 (S979,6401 -14.9% ;7.421.862 $864,744 13.2%' Net Revenues $578.256 (5220.4681j S1.083.122 ;1.303.590 ;148.738 S369.206 • 1 1 . j Sn S267,675 S698.170 i $698.170 $834,145 i oa (1 555 556)I (633 00011 (633 000)j (700 000y Total other Sources(uses) (1.287.2.81)1 65.170 i 65,170 j 1 134,145 Net change in wlc components lQ la 1Q • Segnnmg fund balance $2,503.392 S1.793767; $1,793,767� ' 52.942.059 Ending/und oalance 51 793 767 31 538 469 32 942 059 Ti 724 942, No of days working capnal 106 911 193 j 159 0 • SSPECIAL REVENUE FUND Parks/Recreation 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget 3715?el annesrn*%4 :40+,51 S Increase/ S Increase) '995.96 1996-97 1996-97 /Decrease) °'Increase/ 1997-98 Decrease) a ^creaser REVENUES actual Adopted Revised Adooted -Decrease Proposed adccted ._ecrease •s-es S' _;45 S'CC CCC S53,CC0 :S47 C0' -47 0% 550:CC f35C CCC'- -50 2% 'r1 sce:,arecus 24 54C 0 1,100 1 100 IGO 0% 3 0 2;s's ^tersest 1.5:4i ,5CQ dQ5Q 551.1 10 0% 3 465 (2 035 37:ere Total Revenues $154.130 $105,500 $60,150 ($45,350)1 43.09E 553,465 ($52,035)I 49.3% EXPENDITUR.i$ Parks arc Recreation 315.498 SO' SO SO, 0.0% 0 0 0 0% Park Improvements ! 120,404 01 12,828 12,828 0.0%1 01 0 0.0%1 Land 73 957 12',CCO, ',§„QQQ (67 000 -54.9%` CI (122 00011 �100.0%1 Total Expenditures S209,859 S122,000; $87,828 (S54,172 J4.4%1 801 ($122,000)1 •100.O% 1 Nei Revenues (S55,729) ($16,500$ (S7,6781 $8,822 - $53,465 569,965 i Sono xxeeas S0 SO 5O. SO traMfer'o xner 5no K (556 37 5)l (S56.875 (S53 594y norm 01ner Sources/(Uses, SO (556.875)( (556.875)I (S53,594)t i 9e9nmq.Low Balance 5139,971 $84,242 $84,242 i I S19,689 • 411114 Balance 584 242 $10 3671 11/02 319 560 I S 11 SSPDC - OPERATING FUND Parks/Recreation 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget 071S Pet arlMsvn eta 08,0497 S'ncrease/ 3 increase/ 1395.36 1996-97 1996-97 'Decrease) %Increase/ 1997-98 'Decrease) %'ncrease/ REVENUES :•_31 Adopted Revised Accptec -Decrease Proposed Aeccted -Decrease Saes-ix 3-18 354 S923 200 31,050,COC 3127 200 13 8% 31 357 5C0 3434 5C0 47 1% r'zres; —`--=_ 22.1,1QQ 4L Q Lj•:..Q 87 5% 41 254 19 25Q 87 5% Total Revenues $753.625 $945,000 S1,091,250 S146,250 15.5% S1,398,750 S434,500 46.0% EEPE_NO.ITURES -'ersonnei 346 920 350 229 S50,229 SO 0 0% $46.314 a (53,915) -7 d,o Ccerations 34.805 34,800'', S4.800 0 00%, SO (4,800) •1000% Capital . 30 S0 SO; 0, 0.0% SO 0 00% Pay Plan Implementation i IQ SQ I Q I Q 0.0%f Total Expenditures $51,7251 $55,029 $55,029: SO 0.0%t $41 700 I (68,015i -14.6%: I I Net ReYenues S711,900 S889,971 i S1,036,221 S146,250 S1,351,736 S461,765 i I ansfers Out (405 200) (344.770)i (969.770) (651,812) %,ocee0s tom C 0 Sale , Torn Omer Sources!Uses. (4C5200 (344.770)I (969,770) (651,612)I Ststmi gFlea Balance S393,846 S700,546' S700,546 i S766,997 Ocl Saline* $700 54( $1 245 747 S 7 $1 466 921 • S g • SPDC - DEBT SERVICE FUND Parks/Recreation 1997-98 Proposed Budget and 1996-97 Revised Budget J71 PA adndsun w ;dC1,9; S Increase/ 5:ncrease/ 1955.36 1996-97 1996-97 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1997-98 Decrease) %'ncrease/ REVENUES Actual Adopted Revised Adcctec -Decrease Proposed Acccted -Cecrease -?st rccrre 315 4 3 322 CCQ 3.1 -MQ C$7 CCab •31 8% 3275 '321 25) -S8 3% Total Revenues $16,425 $22,000 $15,000 ($7,000) -31.8% $275 ($21,725) -98.8% EXPENDITURES =rinclpal S95 000 S110.000: S345,0001 $235,000'. 213 6%. 5205,000 595,CCO 86 4% r..terest 282.901 234.770! 305.829 71.0591 30.3%I 446,812 212.0421 90 3% Admtn Expenses 700 LQQQ!1 1,5QQ 5122 i 50.0%f 2-2Q7 1 I.QQQ' 100.0%! Total Expenditures 3378,601 8345,770: S852,329 $308,559' 88.7% $653,812' $308,042I 89.1%. I I 1 Net Revenues ($362,176) ($323,770)1 (S637,329)1 ($313,559 N ($653,537) $309,042' • Proceeds from bond sale SC SO� $0 SO rranslers:n $363 20Q $344 770 $379 770 $651 812 -oral:Inc'Sources UfeL 3363.200 $344,770 3370,770 $651,812 Beginning Fund Balance 3263,767 $264,791, $264,7 91- S7,232 1 Ending Fund Balance $264 791 S785 791 $7 717 � i ,SS 507' I S S 9 PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 III ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND/CATEGORY 1996-97 1996-97 1997-98 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1995-96 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted General Fund Personnel 4,781,025 6,075,068 6,219,939 7,546,544 1,471,476 24.2% Operations 2,707,550 3,363,706 3,511,848 4,664,921 1,301,215 38.7% Capital Outlay 677,982 1,140,453 1,238,874 1,505,254 364,801 32.0% Pay Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 100.0% Total 8.166.557 10.579,227 10,970,661 13.866,719 3,287,492 31.1% Debt Service Fund Debt Service 1,490,094 1.683,946 1.687,446 2.449,983 766,037 45.5% Total 1,490,094 1,683,946 1,687,446 2,449,983 766,037 45.5% Utility Fund Personnel 582,751 590,250 589,079 752,102 161,852 27.4% Operations 4,215,240 3,867,100 2,880,381 3,908,145 41,045 1.1% Capital Outlay 525,678 651,720 659,970 687,125 35,405 5.4% Debt Service 824,132 1,448,048 1,448,048 2,062,490 614,442 42.4% Pay Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 12.000 12.000 100.0% Total . 6,147,801 6,557,118 5,577,478 7,421,862 864,744 13.2% likal Revenue- /Recreation Fund Operations 48,597 0 11,133 0 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 161,263 122.000 55.000 0 (122,000) -100.0% Total 209,859 122,000 66,133 0 (122,000) -100.0% SPDC Fund Personnel 46,920 50,229 50,229 46,314 (3,915) -7.8% Operations 4,805 4,800 4,800 0 (4,800) 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 378,601 345,770 652,329 653,812 308,042 89.1% Pay Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 700 700 100.0% Total 430,326 400,799 707,358 700,826 300,027 74.9% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 16,444,638 19,343,090 19,009,076 24,439,390 5,096,300 26.3% EXPENDITURE CATEGORY Personnel 5,410,696 6,715,547 6,859,247 8,344,960 1,629,413 24.3% Operations 6,976,191 7,235,606 6,408,162 8,573,066 1,337,460 18.5% Capital Outlay 1,364,923 1,914,173 1,953,844 2,192,379 278,206 14.5% Debt Service 2,692,827 3,477,764 3,787,823 5,166,285 1,688,521 48.6% Pay Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 162.700 162,700 100.0% ND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 16,444,638 19,343,090 19,009,076 24,439,390 5,096,300 26.3% • to PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 S ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY 1996-97 1996-97 1997-98 3 Increase/ % Increase/ 1995-96 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease 3ENERALFUND Actual Budget Bullet Budget Adopted Adopted City Secretary/Mayor/Council Personnel 88.336 98,903 95.145 98,434 (469) -0 5'/0 -rerat:ons 151,847 157.463 121.932 133,390 (24,073) -15 3% ac'tal Outlay 15J75 6 887 7,500 5,488 Li 359; -20 P% Total 255 958 263,253 224,577 237,312 (25,941) -9.9% Human Resources Personnel 0 44,294 56,329 90,572 46,278 104 5% Operations 0 51,716 76,670 77,916 26,200 50.7% Capital Outlay 0 0 3 000 0 0 100.0% Total 0 96,010 135,999 168,488 72,478 75.5% City Manager's Office Personnel 322,921 389,989 418,552 282,545 (107,444) -27.6% Operations 90,374 49,613 74,506 64,075 14,462 29.1% Capital Outlay 19.229 6.700 12.300 0 (6.7001 -100.0% Total 432,524 446,302 505,358 346,620 (99,682) -22.3% Support-Services Personnel 25,833 28,218 27,272 28,101 (117) -0.4% Operations 887,309 937,792 1,136,005 1,218,600 280,808 29.9% Capital Outlay 68.169 79.150 98.000 338.900 259.750 328.2% fik981,311 1,045,160 1,261,277 1,585,601 540,441 51.7% e Personnel 196,245 238,462 250,012 249,400 10,938 4.6% Operations 103,894 135,379 143,191 161,036 25,657 19.0% Capital Outlay 90.525 7.750 30.373 0 -100.0% Total 390,664 381,591 423,576 410,436 28,845 7.6% Municipal Court Personnel 125,883 121,545 159,015 154,091 32,546 26.8% Operations 71,002 95,475 95,486 119,614 24,139 25.3% Capital Outlay 9.344 2.800 6.150 3.500 700 25.0% Total 206,229 219,820 260,651 277,205 57,385 26.1% Teen Court Personnel 26,679 35,816 28,782 37,004 1,188 3.3% Operations 8,976 15,640 14,655 17,605 1,965 12.6% Capital Outlay 2.930 750 7,210 0 (750) -100.0% Total 38,585 52,206 50,647 54,609 2,403 4.6% Community Services Personnel 0 0 0 210,101 210,101 100.0% Operations 0 0 0 140,562 140,562 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 9.450 9.450 100.0% Total 0 0 0 360,113 360,113 100.0% Fire Services Personnel 714,706 893,272 927,272 1,063,263 169,991 19.0% Operations 107,846 175,429 178,327 310,231 134,802 76.8% (Outlay 79.373 273.563 273.563 248,200 (25.363) -9.3% 901,925 1,342,264 1,379,162 1,621,694 279,430 20.8% I ( PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 S ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY 1996-97 1996-97 1997-98 3 Increase/ % Increase/ 1995-96 Adopted Revised Proposed Decrease) -Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted -Police Services Personnel 1.117.320 1617.572 1,666,370 2,158.435 540,863 33.4% Operations 173,125 248.575 257.127 407,032 158,457 63.7% Capital Outlay 98,615 281,703. 287_125 364 155 82,452 29 3% Total 1.389 060 2,147.850 2,210.622 2.929,622 781,772 36.4% Public Safety Support Personnel 660,759 707,761 694,442 724,687 16,926 2.4% Operations 136.948 175.549 181,865 214,673 39,124 22.3% Capital Outlay 38.010 52.642 71.056 131.225 78.583 149.3% Total 835,717 935,952 947,363 1,070,585 134.633 14.4% Building Inspection Personnel 289,754 352.464 380,093 426,589 74,125 21.0% Operations 56,026 72.140 64,340 96,180 24,040 33.3% Capital Outlay 5.448 29.000 65.517 56.650 27.650 95.3% Total 351,228 453.604 509,950 579,419 125,815 27.7% Streets/Drainage Personnel 416,636 420,063 420,063 420,649 586 0.1% Operations 370,467 377,055 395,100 428,480 51,425 13.6% ital Outlay 83.935 99.800 85.630 85.500 (14.300) -14.3% 871,038 896,918 900,793 934,629 37,711 4.2% Works Administration Personnel 245,989 390,689 417,021 527,598 136,909 35.0% Operations 109,881 231,461 122,365 392,312 160,851 69.5% Capital Outlay 4.468 101,338 73.292 111.616 10.278 10.1% Total 360,338 723,488 612,678 1,031,526 308,038 42.6% Parks and Recreation Personnel 196,403 289,721 252,376 565,909 276,188 95.3% Operations 311,277 464,679 495,928 718,070 253,391 54.5% Capital Outlay 116.294 198.370 214.613 139.400 (58.970) -29.7% Total 623,974 952,770 962,917 1,423,379 470,609 49.4% Community Development Personnel 292,053 382,412 373,755 445,911 63,499 16.6% Operations 82,106 124,745 114,104 114,115 (10,630) -8.5% Capital Outlay 43.336 0 805 11.170 11,170 100.0% Total 417,495 507,157 488,664 571,196 64,039 12.6% Economic Development Personnel 61,508 63,887 53,440 63,255 (632) -1.0% Operations 46,472 50,995 40,247 51,030 35 0.1% Capital Outlay 2.531 0 2.740 0 0 0.0% Total 110,511 114,882 96,427 114,285 (597) -0.5% Pay_Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 100.0% alL GENERAL FUND 8,166,557 10,579,227 10,970,661 13,866,719 3,287,492 31.1% PROPOSED BUDGET 1997-98 S ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY 1996-97 1996-97 1997-98 3 Increase/ % Increase/ 1995-96 Adopted Revised Proposed Decrease; -Decrease Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted DEBT SERVICE FUND Pnrc.pal 908.600 947,350 947,350 1,092,350 145,000 15.3% Interest 579,194 734,096 734,096 1.351,633 617.537 84.1% =,. miristrative Expenses 2300 2 500 6 000 6 00Q 3,500 140 0% 7otai 1 490.094 1.683.946 1,687.446 2,449.983 766.037 45 5% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1.490,094 1,683,946 1,687,446 2,449,983 766.037 45.5% UTILITY FUND Water Utilities Personnel 464,002 460,242 461,400 563,010 102,768 22.3% Operations 3,084:619 2,883,235 1,957,181 2,913,245 30:010 1.0% Capital Outlay 502.832 512,720 484,470 567.850 55.130 10.8% Total 4,051,453 3,856,197 2,903,051 4,044,105 187,908 4.9% Wastewater Utilities Personnel 118.749 130 008 127,679 189,092 59,084 45.4% Operations 736,765 475,865 457,200 494,900 19,035 4.0% Capital Outlay 22.846 139,000 175.500 119.275 (19.7251 -14.2% 878,360 744,873 760,379 803,267 58,394 7.8% ill ton nnei 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations 393,855 508,000 466,000 500,000 (8,000) -1.6% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 393,855 508,000 466,000 500,000 (8,000) -1.6% Non-Departmentalized Other 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 824,132 1,448.048 1,448.048 2,062,490 614.442 42.4% Total 824,132 1,448,048 1,448,048 2,062,490 614,442 42.4% Pay Plan Implementation- 1/98 0 0 0 12,000 12,000 100.0% TOTAL UTILITY FUND 6,147,801 6,557,118 5,577,478 7,421,862 864,744 13.2% SPECIAL REVENUE- PARKS/RECREATION FUND Operations 48,597 0 11,133 0 0 0:0% Capital Outlay 161,263 122.000 55.000 0 (122,000) -100.0% Total 209,859 122,000 66,133 0 (122,000) -100.0% SPDC FUND Personnel 46,920 50,229 50,229 46,314 (3,915) -7.8% Operations& Maintenance 4,805 4,800 4,800 0 (4,800) -100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% •ervice 378,601 345,770 652,329 653,812 308,042 89.1% an Implementation - 1/98 0 0 0 700 700 100.0% Total 430,326 400,799 707,358 700,826 300,027 74.9% GRAND TOTAL 16,444,638 19,343,090 19,009,076 24,439,390 5,096,300 26.3% 13 • SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS FY1997-98 TOTAL DEPARTMENT,Division ITEM AMOUNT PERSONNEL OPERATIONS CAPITAL GENERAL FUND 100-GENERAL GOVERNMENT 100-City Secretary,Maycr Two 4 drawer'ateral fire-proof file cabinets 5 53_$ 0 0 5_583 City Council TOTAL 5.588 0 0 5.588 102-Human Resources Laptop Computer 3.000 0 Q 3.000 TOTAL 3,000 0 0 3.000 105-Support Services Additional Lease Space 45,000 0 45,000 0 Heavy duty 3-hole drill 4,000 0 0 4,000 New sound system for Council Chambers 4,500 0 0 4,500 'Upgrade city-wide telephone system 200,000 0 0 200,000 'Wireless network for remote data terminals 130 000 0 Q 130.000 TOTAL 383,500 0 45,000 338,500 109-Community Services Operation of Senior Center 8,700 0 8.700 0 Furniture,appliances for Senior Center 7.700 0 0 7,700 Computer,printer for Senior Center office 1.750 Q Q 1.750 TOTAL 18,150 0 8,700 9,450 •06-FINANCE 107-Municipal Court Computer Upgrades 2,000 0 0 2.000 Computer Hutch 500 0 0 500 Dot Matrix Printer 500 0 0 500 Book Shelf 544 Q Q 5Q4 TOTAL 3,500 0 0 3.500 130-PUBLIC SAFETY 131-Fire Services Education Prevention 42,772 42,772 0 0 Furniture for 2 employees 850 0 0 850 Defibrillators 12,000 0 0 12,000 Life Pak upgrade 10,000 0 0 10,000 High Rise Nozzles 4,200 0 0 4,200 Life Pak 11 New 16,500 0 0 16,500 Kiser Sled 2,000 0 0 2,000 150 lb. Rescue Mannequir 900 0 0 900 Digital Camera 1,095 0 0 1,095 Camera(35) 2,313 0 0 2,313 Hydrocarbon Tester 1,089 0 0 1,089 Emergency Management 7,948 0 7,948 0 Oxygen Monitors 2,100 0 0 2,100 'SCBA Compressor 36,000 0 0 36,000 *Hose Washer 12,000 0 0 12,000 'Vehicles 147.153 Q Q 147.153 TOTAL 298,920 42,772 7,948 248,200 0 No S SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS FY1997-98 TOTAL Q EPA RTMENTLfvl ion ITEM AMQUNTPERSQNN_EL QPE_RATtON_S CAPITAL GENERAL FUND 13C-PUBLIC SAFETY 132-Police Services Three°ubiic Safety Officers 135,885 135.885 0 One Detective 35.920 35,920 0 0 Replacement Body Armor 3.000 0 3.000 0 Portable Radios for New Personnel(10) 13,000 0 0 13 CCC Six Police Bicycles with accessories 8,555 0 0 8.555 Chairs(4),desks and shelves for offices 3.425 0 0 3 425 Night Vision Device 2,500 0 0 2.500 NE Street Crimes Unit 2,648 0 2,648 0 Charging System for Battery Maintenance 1,900 0 0 1,900 Wireless Video Camera for investigations 2,500 0 0 2,500 Hand held'adec camera 8mm for Sgt's vehicle 599 0 0 599 Pepper Mace OC Spray for all members 1,890 0 0 1,890 Spare Motorcycle radio accessories 700 0 0 700 Stinger Pursuit Termination Devices 1.800 0 1,800 0 Motorola Vehicle Radio Modem(VRM) 3,500 0 0 3.500 Air CompressoriMinor Tools 1,353 0 0 1.353 'Police Vehicles 312,763 0 0 312.763 'Replacement in-car video cameras(2) 11.470 Q 0 11.470 TOTAL 543.408 171,805 7,448 364,155 S 133-Public Safety Support Jail Monitor Upgrade 4,100 0 0 4,100 Support Technician 27,555 27,555 0 0 Vehicle Mounts for Laptop Computer 8,750 0 0 8,750 Office Equipment 3,225 0 0 3,225 *Radio Equipment for 800 MHZ system 268,562 0 0 268,562 'Tower PC's (3), Utility Laptops(14) 42,500 0 0 42,500 •Presentation Laptops 24,000 0 0 24.000 *Forte's pen computer 48.650 Q Q 48.650 TOTAL 427,342 27,555 0 399,787 140-PUBLIC WORKS 142-Building Inspections One Building Inspector(100%hire with computer) 33,308 30,808 500 2,000 Software,desk 8 chair 1,150 0 0 1,150 Mobil radio 1,500 0 0 1,500 Mobil radio 1,500 0 0 1,500 Monitor 500 0 0 500 Printer 1,500 0 0 1,500 File Cabinets 500 0 0 500 *Pickup 24,000 0 0 24,000 'Pickup 24.000 Q 0 24.000 TOTAL 87,958 30,808 500 56,650 144-Streets and Drainage Letter Labeling System 4,500 0 0 4,500 Concrete Planner 3,000 0 0 3,000 'Dump TRICK 42,000 0 0 42,000 S '1i2 ton pickup 20,000 0 0 20,000 'Mowing Tractor 16.000 Q 0 16.000 TOTAL 85,500 0 0 85,500 I6-- S SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS FY1997-98 TOTAL DEPARTMENT/Division ITEM AMQUNT PERSONNEL QPERAT1046 CAPITAL GENERAL FUND 1-4C-PUBLICWORKS 146-Public Works Admin GIS software 43.443 0 0 43 443 Computer-UNIX 11,200 0 0 11.200 GIS Analyst 58.403 38.528 0 19 375 Office Furniture 2.663 0 0 2 663 Color Printer 3,735 0 0 3.735 Sun Memory 2.700 0 0 2.700 Surface Monumentation 29,400 0 0 29.400 TAD Tape Conversion 1,200 0 0 1.200 WORM Drive 600 0 0 600 Jet Direct Cards 1,000 0 0 1,000 Portable Radios(2) 5,400 0 0 5,400 'Vehicle-Drainage Inspector 19,000 0 0 19.000 Computer-City Engineer 2.000 4 Q 2.444 TOTAL 180,744 38,528 0 142,216 145-PARKS AND RECREATION 145-Parks and Recreation Building Maintenance 21,641 21,641 0 0 S Trailer 4,900 0 0 4,900 Software/Computers 15,000 0 5,000 10,000 Safety Net 2,000 0 0 2,000 Library Books 10,000 0 0 10.000 '1 ton crew cab pickup(Bob Jones Park) 25,000 0 0 25,000 'Gang reel mower 15,000 0 0 15,000 *24 Passenger Van 45,000 0 0 45,000 'Two Pool Vehicles 30.000 0 Q 30.000 TOTAL 168,541 21,641 5,000 141,900 150-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 150-Community Development Current Planner 41,693 37,668 0 4,025 Windows NT Upgrade for all computers 6,145 0 0 6,145 Corridor Study Ph.2 Concept Development 15,000 0 15,000 0 HP Laser Printer L Q Q Q 1.300 TOTAL 64,138 37,668 15,000 11,470 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,270,289 370,777 89,596 1,809,916 •items with asterisk are to be funded through Certificates of Obligation with a 5 year maturity 0 I(f) S SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS FY1997-98 TOTAL DEPARTMENT/Div_ision ITEM AN1Q lt`NT PE .ONIIEL 4PERATIQNN CAPITAL UTILITY FUND 147-Water Utilities One Equipment Operator 23,940 23.940 0 0 One Maintenance Worker-Water Dist 20.122 20,122 0 0 Fireproof file cabinet and four drawer file cabinet 1,000 0 OCC Light tower 4,000 0 0 4,000 Tapping Machine 1.700 0 0 1.700 3/4 ton pickup 27,900 0 0 27.900 Two Maintenance Workers-Fire Hydrant& Inspect. 40,244 40,244 0 0 1 ton utility truck 37,950 0 0 37.950 Air compressor,sandblaster,generator 5,700 0 0 5.700 Four Computers-(1)personal and(3)laptops 10,600 0 0 10,600 Radios 6,800 0 0 6,800 Storz syeamer nozzle connection 58,000 0 0 58,000 Vibratory Compactor 3,400 0 0 3,400 Building Improvements 115.600 Q Q 135.600 TOTAL 376,956 84,306 0 292,650 148-Sewer Utilities One Equipment Operator 23,940 23,940 0 0 One Maintenance Worker 20,122 20,122 0 0 3/4 ton pickup 27,900 0 0 27,900 S 6 Diesal pump 48,500 0 0 48,500 Auto Crane Hoist 11,025 0 0 11,025 SCBA 3,500 0 0 3,500 Tripod 2,750 0 0 2,750 Two Ventilators 2,400 0 0 2,400 Two Gas Detectors 5,600 0 0 5,600 All Terrain Vehicle 9,500 0 0 9,500 Laptop Computer Z($�Q Q Q 2_800 TOTAL 158,037 44,062 0 113,975 GRAND TOTAL UTILITY FUND 534,993 128,368 0 406,625 SPECIAL.REVENUE FUND-PARKS/RECREATION 350-SPECIAL REVENUE FUND (Includes Park Dedication Fund and Park Special Revenue-Other) TOTAL ALL FUNDS 2,805,282 499,145 89,596 2,216.541 0 17 S SCHEDULE OF UNFUNDED NEEDS FY1997-98 TOTAL DEPARTMENT/Division ITEM AMOUNTPERSONN_EL OPERATIONa CAPITAL 3E&nrtna GENERAL FUND 10C-GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1CC-City Secretary Mayor administrative Clerk 19,949 19.949 0 0 City Council Desk 600 0 0 600 Chairs(2) 600 0 0 6C0 Personal Computer 4.000 0 0 4.000 Printer L500 Q Q 1.5C0 TOTAL 26,649 19.949 0 6.700 102-Human Resources Supervisory Academy Training Program 17,000 0 17.000 0 HRIS System 5..QCX2 Q 5_0g2 Q TOTAL 22,CCO 0 22,000 0 103-City Manager's Office Personal Computer 2,000 0 0 2,000 Printer 1.500 Q 0 1 S00 TOTAL 3,500 0 0 3,500 S 105-Support Services GBC Binder 600 0 0 600 Portable recorder w/exterior mike for taping SQQ Q Q TOTAL 1,100 0 0 1,100 106-FINANCE 106-Finance Purchasing Agent(PA) 38,528 38,528 0 0 Office Furniture for PA 2,030 0 0 2,030 • Computer for PA 2,300 0 0 2,300 Fixed Asset Inventory Update 13,000 0 13,000 0 Utility Billing Bar Code System 62,000 0 62,000 0 Finance Software Package 283,000 0 283,000 0 Color Copier 2,500 0 0 2,500 Digital Imaging-Records Storage 75.000 Q 75.000 Q TOTAL 478,358 38,528 433,000 6,830 109-Community Services "Southlake Today"video production 30 000 Q .• 30.000 Q TOTAL 30,000 0 30,000 0 130-PUBLIC SAFETY 131-Fire Services EMS Haz-mat Tech 35,618 35,618 0 0 Furniture for one employee 850 0 0 850 Robot for DPS education 6 Q Q L0000 TOTAL 42,468 35,618 0 6,850 S 0-PUBLIC SAFETY 132-Police Services One Public Safety Officer 45,295 45,295 0 0 Three Police Officers 113,079 113,079 0 0 One Support Service Supervisor 46,194 46,194 0 0 Cooperative Purchase Keller Intoxlyzer 4.350 Q 4.350 Q TOTAL 208,918 204,568 4,350 0 I • SCHEDULE OF UNFUNDED NEEDS FY1997-98 TOTAL QEPARTMEW ivisicn ITEM AMQU_NTPERSONN_EL, OPERATIONS CAPITA", GENERAL FUND 140-PUBLIC WORKS 142-Building Inspections Ore ears Examiner(100%hire with computer) 39 308 36,808 500 2.000 Software. Desk&chair,drafting table&chair 2.000 0 0 2,000 One Building Inspector(100%hire with computer) 33.308 30,808 500 2,000 Software,desk&chair 1 150 Q Q 1 15Q TOTAL 75,766 67,616 1,000 7.150 14 -Streets and Drainage Two Street/Drainage Maintenance Workers 31,960 31,960 0 0 Public Works Facility 105 450 Q Q 105 450 TOTAL 137,410 31.960 0 105.450 140-PUBLIC WORKS 146-Public Works Admin. Construction Inspector 58,950 36,931 0 22,019 Vehicle-Pool 19,000 Q Q 19.000 TOTAL 77,950 36,931 0 41,019 III 145-PARKS AND RECREATION 145-Parks and Recreation Park Crew Leader(mid-yr hire) 12,882 12,882 0 0 Park Maintenance I(mid-yr hire) 10,812 10,812 0 0 Office Assistant(Part-time) 8,632 8,632 0 0 Park Supervisor(mid yr hire) 21,183 21,183 0 0 Recreation Supertident(mid-yr hire) 24,700 24,700 0 0 Recreation Specialist 27,169 27,169 0 0 Software/Computers 12,500 0 0 12,500 (6)Practice soccer fields($5,000 each) 30,000 0 0 30,000 Renovation of Hockey Court(JU) 25,000 0 0 25,000 Lights,Field#1 JU 45,000 0 0 45,000 Fence Extension AA 5,000 0 0 5,000 Park Entrance Patching 5,000 0 5,000 0 JU Equipment 5,000 0 5,000 0 Resod Field#2 14,000 0 0 14,000 New lights, Field#3 40,000 0 0 40.000 Signage-all parks 7,000 0 7,000 0 Fences#4,#5 16.805 Q 16.805 Q TOTAL 310,683 105,378 33,805 171,500 150-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 150-Community Development Current Planner 41,693 37,668 0 4,025 Community Development Assistant 28.733 25.133 Q 3.600 TOTAL 70,426 62,801 0 7,625 151-Economic Development Marketing Plan 12.375 Q 12375 Q S TOTAL 12.375 1,4 0 12,375 0 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 97,603 603,349 536,530 357,724 ADOPTED FY 1997-98 • PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED THROIERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION • FIVE YEA GRAM FUNDING SOURCE EXISTING 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001 02 PROJECT FUNDS FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR TOTAL MUNICIPAL FACILITIES PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY(1) $0 $263,850 $240,540 ' $200,000 $150,000 $0 SO $854,390 .01'Y BALE,�ACILJTY ;. $0 $78,118 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $78.118 TOTAL MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SO $341,968 $240,540 $200,000 $150,000 $0 SO $932,508 SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE DOVE ESTATES LIFT STATION $0 $0 $145,979 $24,021 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 PHASE 3 SEWER ASSESSMENT-ENGINEERING (2) $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 6':: 1>: g. : :.. �� � 70 1WA£11lFARI>:..i6t.ifE::<::::::::.:<::<»::>:>:' ::'::: ::::::; :i::: ::;::':;:::::::::>::::::>::>:::::::::: $36 781 $160,000 $0 GRAVITY MAIN-CROSSROADS SQUARE(a) $0 $125,000 $50,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 SEWER LINE EXTENSION NORTH ON WHITE CHAPEL TO BOB JONES PARK $0 $0 $19,520 • $0 $0 $0 $19,520 HILLSIDE ESTATES SEWER $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,200 $59,800 $0 $65,000 HUNTER'S RIDGE SEWER $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $69,000 $0 $75,000 SEWER FROM FM 1709 TO KIMBALL AVE. $0 $0 , $0 $0 $28,160 $323,840 $0 $352,000 SEWER MAIN DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS ~ S-2 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 N-1 $63,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,482 TRA AGREEMENT SEWER IMPROVEMENTS(3) DOVE ST.FORCE MAIN(LONESOME DOVE TO KIRKWOOD)PHASE 1(b) $0 $657,000 $300,000 • $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,018,000 18"FORCE MAIN(RAINTREE VICINITY TO LONESOME DOVE)PHASE 2 $0 $0 $432,000 ' $216,000 $0 $0 $0 $648,000 LIFT STATION @ RAINTREE VICINITY $0 $0 $318,750 • $106,250 $0 $0 $0 $425 000 18"GRAVITY LINE FROM MESCO LIFT STATION TO RAINTREE LIFT STATION $0 $0 $116,667 • $58,333 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 TOTAL SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE $350,263 $942,000 $1,382,916 $465,604 $39,360 $452,640 $0 $3,632,783 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 12"WATER LINE-DOVE ST. TO KIRKWOOD BLVD. (c) $0 $200,000 $126,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $326,000 8"WATER LINE-N.PEYTONVILLE AVE WITH 6"SEWER LINE(d) $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 24"TRANSMISSION LINE FROM TROPHY CLUB(e) $0 $1,300,000 $105,550 • $105,550 $0 $0 $0 $1,511,100 20"TRANSMISSION LINE FROM P.S.#2 TO DOVE ELEVATED TANK(0 $0 $0 $850,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 12"WATER LINE-CONTINEN fAL BLVD.AND KIMBALL AVE. $0 $490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0 $490,000 VILLAGE CENTER INFRASTRUCTURE $130,000 $119,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,700 20"WATER LINE FM 1709NVHITE CHAPEL TO WOODLAND HEIGHTS(g) $0 $541,000 $100,000 ' $0 $0 $0 $0 $641,000 12"WATER LINE FROM P.S.#2 TO IBM COMPLEX . $0 $0 $0 $94,500 $94,500 12"LINE ON CONTINENTAL FROM CROOKED LN.TO HERITAGE BUS.PARK $0 $0 $162,000 • $0 Su $0 $0 $162,000 12"WATER LINE ON DOVE ST,FROM WHITE CHAPEL TO CARROLL AVE. $0 $0 $22,800 • $262,200 $0 $0 ' $0 $285,000 12"WATER LINE ON WHITE CHAPEL FROM HIGHLAND TO FM 1709 $0 $0 $22,800 • $174,800 $87,400 $0 SO $285,000 1.5 MG ELEVATED TANK AT MIRON SITE AND 20"WATER LINE(h) $0 $0 $855,000 ' $855,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,710,000 N.PEARSON 30/36"WATER LINE TO SH 114 $0 $0 $298,681 • $1,000,000 $2,434,835 $0 S0 $3,733,516 12"WATER LINE ALONG W. BOB JONES TO T.W.KING TO P.S.#2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500 $316,250 $0 $343,750 12"WATER LINE-RANDOL MILL TO W.DOVE THEN TO PEYTONVILLE $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,400 $303,600 $0 $330,000 Page 1 ADOPTED FY 1997-98 • PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED THRO'ERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION • FIVE YEA GRAM FUNDING SOURCE EXISTING 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 PROJECT FUNDS FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR TOTAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CONT. #3_P J SON(4) : ....>... : ::' : # _: $1,533,553 $1,347,447 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,881,000 - #2 T.W.KING(i) $0 $600,000 $2,/10,000 • $400,000 $0 $0 S0 $3,110,000 12"WATER LINE ALONG N. PEYTONVILLE FROM DOVE TO FM 1709 $0 $0 $0 S0 $51,040 $486,960 $100,000 S638,000 12"WATER LINE ALONG FM 1709 FROM PEARSON TO N.PEYTONVILLE $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,200 $304,800 $100,000 $440,000 12"WATER LINE ALONG E.DOVE FROM N CARROLL TO N. KIMBALL $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500 $316,250 $0 $343,750 12"WATER LINE ALONG E. HIGHLAND FROM N.CARROLL TO N.KIMBALL $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,800 $162,200 $100,000 $285,000 8"WATER LINE ALONG N KIMBALL FROM SHADY LN TO DOVE ST. $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,560 $43,470 $43,470 $94,500 20"TRANSMISSION WATER LINE FROM FM. 1709 TO N.WHITE CHAPEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,360 $260,820 $260,820 $567,000 12"WATER LINE FROM FM 1709 TO E.CONTINENTAL ALONG S.CARROLL $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,800 $131,100 $131,100 $285,000 12"WATER LINE ALONG N.CARROLL FROM DOVE TO HIGHLAND $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500 $316.250 $0 $343.750 PAINT FLORENCE WATER TOWER $0 i $0 $73,500 ' $0 $0 $0 $0 $73,500 TOTAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE $1,663,553 $4,663,147 $4,726,331 $2,892,050 $2,815,895 $2,641,700 $735,390 $20,008,066 NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER/STREET PROJECTS JOHNSON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION(WITH 12"WATER LINE) $0 $0 $0 $459,200 $229,600 $0 $0 $688,800 RIDGECREST,BRIAN,HILLTOP REHAB $353,200 $246,700 $0 S0 $0 $0 S0 $599,900- SHADY LANE AREA(5) (j) $0 $0 $1,467,445 $458,550 $0 $0 S0 $1,925,995 W.CONTINENTAL BLVD. RECONSTRUCTION $555,750 $0 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $555,750 W.DOVE ST.RECONSTRUCTION-PEYTONVILLE AVE./SHADY OAKS DR. $222,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $222,680 W.DOVE ST.RECONSTRUCTION-S.H. 114 TO WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. $0 $0 $15,000 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 W.HIGHLAND ST. RECONSTRUCTION-SHADY OAKS DR.TO WHITE CHAPEL $301,480 $0 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $301,480 STREET REHAB-TIMARRON $325,000 $325,000 $0 S0 $0 $0 S0 $650,000 HUNTWICK ESTATES SEWER(k) $108,000 $0 $92,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 S200,000 DIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES-SEWER&STREETS $0 $1,286,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,286,000 MISSION HILL-CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS $59,191 $0 $0 $38,309 $0 $0 $0 $97,500 MISSION HILL-SEWER(I) $0 $368,000 $62,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $430,000 BURNEY LN.REHAB. TO CUL-DE-SAC $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 BURNEY LN.RECONSTRUCTION-N.CARROLL AVE. TO LONESOME DOVE $0 $0 $129,400 $17,600 S0 $0 S0 $147,000 LOVE HENRY COURT RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $66,800 $42,200 $0 $0 $0 $109,000 LAKE DR.RECONSTRUCTION(INCLUDES SEWER) $0 $0 $93,000 $76,000 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 PINE DR./LILAC LN.RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $18,768 $215,832 $0 $0 $0 $234,600 ,::.y+ .'t>.+.:. .. . . :fi !$0 $0 68 100 $0...�..4R.W.�t.....�`'a.... .Y....(�11�.........1."+!M�y�#::i::>:::;:::�::i::::::::: ::::E;:::�>�:::: :::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::?;:::::::::::::::::::: $ � $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,100 ii1 .L«iTIiAfSiWCl4]Gf.i..1i:? iiiiiiiiiiii :':i >:E'#z::>':<:::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::?: :::::::::::: :::: $0 $17,500 $0 CHAPEL DOWNS-CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 $0 $146,250 $0 $0 $0 S146,250 CONTINENTAL PARK ESTATES-CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 $0 $292,500 $0 $0 $0 S292,500 ENGINEERING-STREET BOND PROJECTS $75,000 $0 $0 SO SO $0 S0 $75.000 CDBG PROJECTS $0 $18,600 $0 $0 $0 SO S0 $18,600 HARRELL DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $11,200 • $128,800 S0 $0 $0 S140,000 UNION CHURCH/S. PEARSON RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $42,745 $491,565 $0 $0 $0 $534,310 SD Page 2 0 ADOPTED FY 1997-98 • PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED THR CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION • FIVE YEA OGRAM • FUNDING SOURCE EXISTING 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 PROJECT FUNDS FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER/STREET PROJECTS(CONT.) T.W.KING REHAB. $0 SO $0 $50,568 $581,532 $0 S0 $632,100 N.WHITE CHAPEL RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $124,877 • SO S0 $0 $0 $124,877 W BOB JONES RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $0 $17,640 $202,860 $0 $0 $220,500: E BOB JONES RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $0 $34,703 $399,087 $0 $0 $433,790 S.KIMBALL EXTENSION FROM CROOKED LN.TO HERITAGE BUS.PARK $0 $0 $80,000 $670,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,750,000 N CARROLL FROM FM 1709 TO SH 114(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $73,850 $1.101,435 $1,115,285 N.KIMBALL FROM SH 114 10 FM 1709(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,481 $183,900 $193,381 W.HIGHLAND FROM SH 114 TO WHITE CHAPEL(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,939 $719,170 $768,109 E.CONTINENTAL FROM BRUMLOW TO CROOKED(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) $0 S0 $0 SO $0 $56,885 $1,211,528 $1,268,413 S. KIMBALL FROM FM 1709 TO CROOKED LN(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,046 $619.509 $660,555 MOCKINGBIRD REHAB. $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,008 $218,592 $0 $237,600 PEARSON LN. RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $0 $35,200 $404,800 $0 $0 $440,000 SAM BASS RIDGE REHAB. $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,397 $108,063 $0 $117,460 SADDLE RIDGE RD REHAB $0 $0 SO S0 $6,272 $72,128 S0 $78,400 SUNSHINE REHAB $0 $0 $0 SO $21,034 $241,886 $0 $262.920 BRUMLOW RECONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $77,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,400 SODA RIDGE REHAB. $0 $0 $0 SO $7,840 $90,160 $0 $98,000 YEAR 3-NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER(JELLICO,DOVE,CROSS TIMBER HILLS) $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 KIMBALL OVERPASS $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 PEYTONVILLE AVE INTERSECTION AT FM 1709 $0 $0 $70,000 ' $500,258 $0 $0 $0 $570,258 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD INTERSECTION AT FM 1709 $0 $0 $118,000 ' $107,000 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 SEAL A1' VOODLAND.HI 1f-11$)8 WAFEfk LINE 7 $0 $17,500 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47.500 VERSAILLES CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200 000 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER/STREET PROJECTS $2,000,301 $2,404,400 $3,498,635 I $5,917,175 $3,081,430 $961,030 $3,835,542 $21,698,513 EQUIPMENT GENERAL FUND EQUIPMENT SO $920,000 SO SO $0 $0 $0 $920,000 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS SINCE 10-1 HERITAGE PARK INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS (m) $0 $100,000 $85,000 • $0 S111,500 SO $0 $296,500 SCHOOL ROAD FROM SHADY OAKS TO WHITE CHAPEL $0 $0 $68,800 $881,200 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 TRAFFIC LIGHT @ FM 1709/SHADY OAKS $0 $0 $100,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 KELLER WATER METER-PURCHASE SOUTHLAKE CUSTOMERS (6) $0 $0 $250,000 • $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TRAFFIC LIGHT @ BYRON NELSON/FM 1709 $0 $40,000 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING LIGHTS(CISD/KISD) $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 TRAFFIC LIGHT©COMMERCE/FM 1709 $0 $0 $/00,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS(WEST JONES BRANCH) $0 $0 $250,000 • $250,000 $0 SO $0 $500,000 DOVE R.O.W.(FOR SH 114) $0 SO $1,500,000 • $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 20"OVERSIZE THROUGH TOWN CENTER $0 $0 $20,000 • $230,000 $0 $0 SO $250,000 SO Page 3 • PROJECTS TO BE FUNDEDADOPTED FIVE YEA OGRAM1997-98 THRO ERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION • FUNDING SOURCE EXISTING 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 PROJECT FUNDS FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR TOTAL ADDITIONAL PROJECTS SINCE 10-1 CONT. FM 1709 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 S-7 SEWER EXTENSION $0 $0 $500,000 " $500,000 $0 S0 $0 $1,000,000 UTILITY RELOCATION FOR SH 114 RECONSTRUCTION(n) $0 $0 $269,600 • $269,600 $500,000 $0 $0 S1,039,200 TOTAL ADDITIONAL PROJECTS $0 $180,000 S3.143,400 S2,555,800 S736,500 $0 $0 S6,615,700 GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS $4,014,117 $9,451,515 $12;991,822 1 $12,030,629 $6,823,185 $4,055,370 $4,570,932 $53,807,570 Certificates of Obligation to be issued $0 $9,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Difference $4,014,117 ($48,485) $12,991,822 $12,030,629 $6,823,185 $4,055,370 $4,570,932 $53,807,570 (1)ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR EXTERIOR FACADE, LANDSCAPING, 8 PARKING PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS PLANNED FOR FY1997-98 (2)CROSS TIMERS/DOVE ACRES✓HILLWOOD ESTATES/JELLICO ESTATES (3)PROJECTS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH TRA AGREEMENT(WHICH IS TO HALT PUMPING SEWER INTO BEAR CREEK BASIN) (4)ADDED$400,000 FOR FENCING AND BRICK WORK THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN INITIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET (5)FY 1996-97 BUDGET TO INCLUDE$709,445 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (6)CITY OF KELLER PROVIDES WATER SERVICE TO APPROX.250 SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS;NEGOTIATING TO TRANSFER THESE CUSTOMERS TO SOUTHLAKE WATER;WILL INVOLVE PURCHASE OF METERS,LINE, ETC. • ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUESTED FOR EITHER A REVISION OR A PROPOSED PROJECT. SEE CORRESPONDING LETTER FOR REVISION UPDATE (a)REVISION INCLUDES CHANGING ALIGNMENT OF SEWER. PROVIDES GRAVITY SEWER FROM BICENTENNIAL PARK ENTRANCE TO WHITE CHAPEL/1709 LIFT STATION. (b)REVISION INCLUDES PLACING 18"FORCE MAIN IN TRENCH WITH PHASE 1($361,000) (c)REVISION INCLUDES ALIGNMENT CHANGE AND ADDITIONAL COST FOR A CLOW VALVE @ IBM (d)6"SEWER LINE COST$50,244.60 AND IS COMPLETED (e)REVISION INCLUDES INCREASED COST DUE TO INCREASED SIZE OF WATER MAIN FROM 20"TO 24"BASED UPON MAY 1997,FREESE&NICHOLS WATER STUDY (I)REVISION INCLUDES ALIGNMENT CHANGE AND COST OF EASEMENTS (g)REVISION INCLUDES ESTIMATED EASEMENTS COST AND CHANGE ORDER FOR VALVES (h)REVISION INCLUDES MODIFICATIONS TO BICENTENNIAL AND DOVE ELEVATED TANKS AND A SECOND FLOOR TO MIRON TANK (,)REVISION INCLUDES INCREASE IN RECENT BID FROM ESTIMATED COST DUE TO ADDITION OF ORNAMENTAL PAINTING (I)PROJECT HAS EXPANDED FROM ORIGINAL CONCEPT 8"WATER LINE ON SHADY LN FROM RAINTREE TO SH 114($112,000) SEWER AND STREETS ON SHADY LN,NORTH FROM RAINTREE(98,400) SEWER AND STREETS ON SHADY LN, SOUTH TO SH114(49,500) PROPOSED CULVERT ON SHADY LN FOR ULTIMATE FLOW($197,850) ,. Page 4 C 11 r\4.. I 1\1/4,0JL.\./J VUIWHWIr11\I • PROJECTS TO BE FUNDEDADOPTS THR 1997-98 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION • FIVE YEA ROGRAM (k)REVISION INCLUDES NEW LIFT STATION AND ABANDONING CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL LIFT STATION (I)REVISION INCLUDES COST FOR ADDITIONAL BORING UNDER TREES/LANDSCAPING IN R.O.W. (m)REVISION INCLUDES REIMBURSEMENT PER DEVELOPER AGREEMENT WITH HERITAGE BUSINESS PARK(OVERSIZE WATER&STREET REIMBURSEMENT) (n)REVISION INCLUDES RELOCATING THE EXISTING 18"WATER LINE @ DOVE&SH 114& INSTALLING A 12"WATER LINE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF SH 114 FROM KIMBALL TO FM 1709& INSTALLING A 12"WATER LINE ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SH 114 FROM SHADY LW TO ALBERTSON'S `:' COMPLETED PR PROJECT OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION Page 5 • Upcoming Met 4 Ae ' s and Events Augusu t 24, 1997 4110 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Aug 4 Aug 5 Aug 6 Aug 7 Aug 8 Aug 9 Aug 10 9:00am Dirctr's Mtg 11:30am CEH lunch 2:00pm CEH mtg w/ 6:00pm P&Z Mtg IChristel's Last Day 11:30am-1:30pm CC l w/Mayor Donna Schroeke 9:OOam Bob Jones Pk briefing from Staff; 5:00pm City Council re:TIF disc-DPS Tower Mtg-5:00 wk 7:00pm JUC Mtg @ Ground Breaking 2:00pm CEH/LAH session;7:00 reg Admin 3:OOpm SPIN Exec Mtg mtg w/Gillum session 6:30pm Pk Board Mtgs 7:00pm Mayor's Council Mtg BW/NW Out of town ` I Sister City Group in El Fuerte, Mexico ` Aug 11 Aug 12 Aug 13 Aug 14 Aug 15 Aug 16 Aug 17 9:00am Director's 1:00pm Senior Adv @ 8:00am Employee 12:00pm Hosp District PACKET DAY —11 Mtg ComBldg Breakfast re: TIF participation 10:00am Staff Agenda 5:00-10:OOpm Budget ' 1:00pm CMAC 11 @ 5:00-10:OOpm Budget ' 11:30am Employee Mtg Work Session @ COG Work Session @ Lunch w/CM 1 I:00am Solana 5:00-10:00pm Budget _ Solana Commissioner's Ct 6:00pm Teen Ct. Vol Work Session © re: TIF Participation Appreciation Dinner Solana @ TC 7:00pm Sister City Mtg Aug 18 Aug 19 Aug 20 Aug 21 Aug 22 Aug 23 Aug 24 9:00am Director's 7:30am NEL @ TCJC 7:00pm SYAC 7:30am Metroport 3rd Reg. CC Mtg Mtg 1 I:30am CEH lunch Orientation @ Lodge 10:30am Grayhill Packet Day 11:30am CC briefing ` w/Mayor Condemnation @ - from Staff I 3:30pm Cncl Comm CCrm 2:00pm Directors w/ on Strategic Plan w/ 5:30pm NETAC Consultants re: Consultants Board Mtg Strategic Plan 5:00pm City Council 7:OOpm Kaleidoscope 6:00pm SPDC Mtg - 5:00 WS; of Homes 7:00pm Tree 7:00 reg session Preservation Wk Group Events subject to change; call to confirm before attending 7/31/1997 ` 1 r TAYLOR, OLSON, ADKINS, SRALLA & ELAM, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW THROCKMORTON STREET TELEPHONE(817)332-2580 00 BANK ONE TOWER FAX(817)332-4740 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102-3821 hcV� i� ' E.ALLEN TAYLOR,JR. U ' fg ►� � f ,I� j u July 30, 1997 II 1 JUL 3 11991 j Mr. Curtis Hawk "^L- _ City Manager ... _ - - City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709c a S Southlake, Texas 76092 "tp , e RE: New Firm Dear Curtis: As you will notice on the letterhead, several of my partners and I have created a new firm named Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. This firm consists of most of the partners of Fielding, Barrett & Taylor, L.L.P., and most important to you, all of the partners, S associates and legal staff that you are accustomed to dealing with on a regular basis. The primary focus of our new firm is on municipal and public law, labor and employment law, and commercial law. The effective date of our change is July 1, 1997. Beginning with the enclosed invoices, please make all payments for legal services directly to Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. My partners in the new firm include: Allen Taylor, Carvan Adkins, Tim Sralla, Betsy Elam, Analeslie Muncy, and Robert Allibon. Debra Drayovitch and George Staples are Of Counsel to the firm. D'Ann Drennan has recently joined our office as a new associate who will be working in the area of municipal law. In addition, we are assisted by four legal assistants - Harriet Siek, Stephanie Lippard, Linda Bush and Trisha Rainwater. We are excited about our change and we hope you are too. I anticipate that you will not see any changes in our working relationship. We anticipate keeping a close working relationship with David Fielding and Dan Barrett, and will in fact remain partners with them in Fielding, Barrett & Taylor, L.L.P., which will continue to operate as to other legal files. We are retaining the same offices, telephone number, fax number, etc. Therefore, other f:\files\toase\letters\engageco.eat r Mr. Curtis Hawk July 30, 1997 Page 2 than learning the new name, it should be business as usual. If I can answer any questions you may have, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, E. Allen Taylor, Jr. EAT/dsz S • f:\files\toase\letters\engageco.ea t RUC-29-97 TUE o'. • 58 p n sTqR rEl`y rw PAX ''° 8176853883 ���� ��8 O1/02 i1YOrt t F • s• r ,� s 6011("1+ L/' July 28, 1997 ` `��-'�' /1\s/if • S61111 A n T oz Attorrax the City of Southlake Mr. Allen Taylor: After looking through public records, I have several questions about Southlake's ethics ordinance, how it is enforced and who interprets it. specifically, I'd like to talk with you about the 11/1 following: *On June 5, 1997, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Joe Wright voted on the site plan for Southlake Oaks phase 2, known as #9, ZA97-058 on the P & Z agenda. On January 30, 1997, a representative of Wright Construction had talked with city representatives and development representatives of Southlake Oaks about providing utilities for the site and then on July 1, 1997 talked with city officials and developers about constructing the Southlake Oaks retail sewer, according to minutes taken by the city of the preconstruction meeting. *Wright has earned more than $1 . 8 million through city contracts while head of P & Z. He went through the bidding process as required under law, but the city awarded him a bid as sole contractor that, if split between two contractors would have saved Southlake $25,000. *Wright voted on items brought before him by his business partners, Terry Wilkinson and Martin Shelling. On May 22, 1997, Wright voted in favor of #6,ZA 97-035 rezoning of a portion of Lot 3 , Block 1, Miron Addition. The owner and applicant was listed as Martin W. Shelling, trustee. Shelling, who is listed as the vice president of Wright Development Corporation owned by Joe wright, listed the same phone number and address on his zoning requests as Wright Construction. 410 Star-Telegram/Northeast 3201 Airport Freeway.S::ite 108 SeCto;d.TX 76027 (817)683-380C sc, �ci Lt).t77'7l.TR F;l:RI Fht—rc—ant JUL-29-1997 18=1E1 FIELDING,BAPPET « TA`r'LOR. 8173324741 P.�3 33 aaqzodag 4spaq4aoH/arszba a T z .ze4s -70 T4R L L's r.zem uor;ua44p .znoic zo3 nod XTeus TTpoaauou�apppe bTai a�pToazdd� in� �RO�' �lIB xy ' TT� �a :,! e!t;Zrsi; 11 t�v�TuoSs a 4no�i4r, I$Au a� wove 4O.zcfda '�a�T�s v?p.to a'�Ta� auk ao pap 4144, 03 ! vv4GO: • g 3�0T 3o s?Td�oo 0 orS2�YAqT1 �� �rd oT� S� s6 �'Z �a eon'ht 4t10 tie ?T ;fl 4401 8�g 1 �� or�a ° ur r��rc ° sp q rr 4;11 �a AAA Err 9�' �s rM �� °Tta� S�so m dkrti0 a;:r ;ehr� p �r ,� a ! "te a C� �a� �o t S�� 4 Uo �`r 4� Z Pro ,� ; pays �'�p�Q ��� �bo 3t S �� ,T gyp ��t '9t p P' 4 00 ph 9�F is 44,3�{ a�r -� ��� AttA brd�p �� �d o� ��tp�d s�o7�QA 4? :; S 4tx p� C'2 a7� • p QrA�o ° i= iff # ko nor, ,r p� �� 4it ,00 ,� r411, voi,„ (ftp I I s AUG-01-1997 15:34 FIELDING,BAPPET 2 T PLOP V 14141 N.U4/1 • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 3 applicable to every such person. Section 2-261 forth definitions of an advisory board, employee and officer. The apparent intent of this section is that no member of an advisory board is considered to be an officer of the city. A member of the planning and zoning commission is specifically defined to be an officer for purposes of the Ethics Code.t Section 2-264 sets forth the standards of conduct which govern officers, employees and advisory board members and their spouses. The pertinent provisions of this section provide in subsection (a) that no city officer shall knowingly: * * * (3) Accept or solicit any gift, favor, service or thing of value, including a promise of future employment of sufficient economic value, that it might reasonably tend to influence him in the discharge of his official duties from any person, group or business entity: a. Who is licensed or has a substantial interest in any business entity that is licensed by any city department, agency, • commission or board on which the city officer, employee or advisory board member serves; or b. Who has a financial interest in any proposed ordinance or decision upon which the city officer, employee or advisory board member may or must act or make a recommendation; provided, however, that any city officer, employee or advisory board member and their spouses, may accept travel and related expenses to attend ceremonial functions, provided that such acceptance and attendance have been approve by the city council prior to the occurrence of the ceremonial function. * * * (6) Engage in any exchange purchase or sale of property, goods, or services with the city except: See also,Tex. Atry. Gen. Op. DM-309 (1994) ruling that members of the Dallas Planning and Zoning Commission are local public officials" under Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code. f:\files\slake\letters\hawk.O 17 • AUG-01-1997 15:35 FIELDING,BAPPE T S: I HYLUF r•u:..' S Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 4 a. Rendering services to the city as an officer, employee or advisory board member; b. Paying taxes, fines, utility service or filing fees; c. executing a nd performing any developer's agreement or plat in compliance with laws and regulations applicable to any person; provided, however, that if any city ordinance, rule or regulation allows any discretion by the appropriate officers or employees of the city in the interpretation or enforcement of such ordinance, rule or regulation, any such discretion shall be exercised in favor of the city in connection with any such developer's agreement or plat; d. Advisory board members who are not otherwise officers or employees of the city, may engage in any exchange, purchase or sale of property, goods or services with the city, or enter into a contract with the city, provided that the board on which they • are a member has no advisory function or cognizance, direct or indirect, present or prospective, with respect to the transaction in which such advisory board member engages or proposed to engage. * * * (8) Engage in or accept private employment or render a service when such employment or service is incompatible with the property discharge of his official duties or would tend to impair his independent judgment in the performance of his official duties. * * * (10) Grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen. The Star Telegram specifically questioned the applicability of the above paragraphs (6), (8) and (10) to the four issues raised. Let me discuss each of these issues separately. f:\files\stakc\laws\bawk.O 17 • �S1 "s r +1 AUG—t01-1997 15:35 FIELDING,BAPPET 2: TAYLOP r•ub:'1 • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 5 FIRST ISSUE Section 2-264(a)(3) prohibits an officer from accepting or soliciting a promise of future employment from any person, group or business entity who has a financial interest in any decision upon which the officer may or must act or make a recommendation. It is alleged that on June 5, 1997, Joe Wright voted on a site plan for Southlake Oaks Phase II although Wright Construction Company had previously been awarded a contract to construct certain improvements in connection with Phase I of this development2. You indicated that the City of Southlake had entered into a developer agreement with the developer of Southlake Oaks, Phase I, for the installation of public infrastructure, including a sanitary sewer line and lift station. The developer entered into a separate agreement with a prime contractor to perform this construction. The prime contractor, through a bidding process, entered into a subcontract with Wright Construction Company on December 10, 1996 to install the sanitary sewer line. I have been presented with no facts that show that Joe Wright or Wright Construction Company accepted or solicited a promise of future employment from the developer or prime contractor of Southlake Oaks, Phase II, or any person who had a financial interest in the • Southlake Oaks project. At the time of the vote on the matter, the subcontract with Wright Construction Company had already been awarded and was pending completion of construction (which had been delayed by the City of Southlake in order to obtain appropriate easements). Under these facts, it is my opinion that Section 2-264(a)(3)was not violated. As pointed out above, neither Joe Wright nor Wright Construction Company had any contract with the City of Southlake pertaining to Southlake Oaks, Phase II; therefore, Section 2-264(a)(6) was not violated. 2For purposes of my opinion, I am assuming that Joe Wright has a substantial interest in Wright Construction Company. Section 2-261 defines a substantial interest to include, among other things, ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity, or ownership of either ten percent (10%) or more or Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) or more of the fair market value of the business entity; or the receipt of funds from the business entity in excess of ten percent (10%) of the person's gross income for the previous years; or being a member of the board of directors of the business entity; or being an employee of the business entity. t:\files\slake\leuer\hawk.Ot7 • ' IY1JV-J1-177 f 1J• .v r +� • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 6 Section 2-264(a)(8) likewise does not apply to the specific facts set forth above. This section prohibits an officer from engaging in or accepting private employment when such employment would tend to impair his independent judgment in the performance of his official duties. This prohibition would be applicable at the time the employment contract was entered into (December 10, 1996) and would be based upon whether the mere engagement in such private employment would be inconsistent with an officer's independent judgment or the performance of his official duties. In other words, this provision prohibits the acceptance of private employment - it does not prohibit voting on a particular matter. Further, it is my opinion that Section 2-264(a)(10) is not applicable based upon the facts that have been presented to me. I have been given no indication that any special consideration, treatment or advantage was given to Southlake Oaks, Phase II, other than what is available to every other citizen. The mere fact that Joe Wright voted on this project does not constitute a violation of this section. SECOND ISSUE The second issue raised by the Star Telegram was that Joe Wright has earned more • than $1.8 million dollars through city contracts since he has been the Chairman of the planning and zoning commission. It was specifically pointed out that the city awarded a bid to Joe Wright as a sole contractor that, if split between two contractors, would have saved the city $25,000.00. You indicated that this allegation appears to be a bit of a distortion of the facts. You explain that the city does, from time to time, solicit competitive bids for the construction of public works improvements, such as sanitary sewer lines, and that these bids are solicited as alternative bids for different portions or sections of the project. The purpose of receiving alternative bids is to allow the city to construct all or part of the project as it deems appropriate and as funds allow. However, in the event that the city deems it appropriate to construct the entire project, the city will award the contract to the overall low bidder. You explained that it is not practical to award contracts in phases where the entire project is to be constructed at once. Let me again point out that the Ethics Code was adopted in March of 1995 and therefore, it would not apply to any contract that was entered into before that date. Section 2-264(a)(6) prohibits an officer from engaging in any exchange, purchase or sale of services with the city,with certain exceptions. One of the exceptions (paragraph d)exempts advisory board members who are not otherwise officers or employees of the city" in certain situations. It is my interpretation of this exception that the Chairman of the planning and f:\files\slake\leiteta\hawk.O17 • Y1Jl]—J1—177 I J.,•JO �1 GL1�11.U)Lnr.RG I C �r.i LV� va��....�� -•+ .w �� S Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 7 zoning commission does not qualify for this exception because he is by definition deemed to be an officer of the city. I also do not find any of the other exceptions that are specifically listed in paragraph (6) to be applicable to a public works construction contract entered into between Joe Wright and the City of Southlake. You raised the point that all contracts between Joe Wright and the City of Southlake are awarded pursuant to competitive bids and that the award of bids to Joe Wright over the last several years has saved the city hundreds of thousands of dollars over what would have been paid to the next low bidder. You explained your position that such a practice is in the public interest and is required by state law. You also recalled that this specific issue arose at the time the Ethics Code was being considered and that it was the intent of city council that these types of contracts not be prohibited because they are deemed to be in the public interest. You have raised a legitimate concern about the interpretation of the Ethics Code. The state legislature has adopted two statutes requiring competitive bidding on public works construction contracts. Both Chapters 252 and 271 of the Local Government Code require the award of certain public works construction contracts to be made pursuant to the • competitive bidding process. Sections 252.043 and 271.027 provide that, "the contract must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder". You questioned whether it would be legal for the city to refuse to award a public works contract to Joe Wright if he were the lowest responsible bidder. Although such a practice might be challenged as being in conflict with state law, it is my opinion that a home rule municipality such as the City of Southlake may legally impose standards of conduct on its officers and employees that could prohibit them from submitting bids on city projects. Any such officer or employee would thereby be disqualified from submitting bids. I also can understand your position that such a restriction would be deemed to be contrary to the public interest. This is an issue for the city council to decide. The city council is given the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the Ethics Code (Section 2-266). Further, Section 2-263(c) specifically provides: (c) The city council may exempt from the provisions of this article any conduct found to constitute a violation by an officer, employee or advisory board member if it finds that the enforcement of this article with respect to such conduct is not in the public interest. If the city council determines that competitively bid contracts should not be exempted from the provisions of the Ethics Code, it is my opinion that any such contract would be t:\files\slake\testers\hawk°17 • AUG-01-1997 15:37 F I ELL)I NG,BHRRE I & I HYLUK S Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 8 prohibited under Section 2-264(a)(6). Because all previous public works construction contracts between the city and Joe Wright were approved by the city council, I can only assume that it was the council's intent to find that they were in the public interest. If the council acknowledges that the intent of the Ethics Code was not to prohibit any competitively bid contracts, it is my recommendation that the Ethics Codc be amended to specifically exempt competitively bid contracts from the prohibition in Section 2-264(a)(6). 1-HIRD ISSUE The third issue involves Joe Wright voting on items brought before the planning and zoning commission by his business partners, Terry Wilkinson and Martin Shelling. Apparently, Mr. Shelling is in reality an employee of Wright Construction Company. Also, you explained that Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Wright are partners on another development project, but are not partners on the project that Mr. Wright voted on. There are no allegations that Mr. Wright accepted or solicited any gift, favor, service, thing of value or employment from Mr. Wilkinson or Mr. Shelling in connection with the matters brought before the planning and zoning commission. This being the case, Sections 2-264(a)(3) and (8) would not be applicable. Similarly, there are no allegations that Mr. Wright granted any • special consideration, treatment or advantage to Mr. Wilkinson or Mr. Shelling beyond that which is available to every other citizen. Therefore, I do not find a violation of Section 2- 264(a)(10) of the Ethics Code. FOURTH ISSUE The final issue submitted by the Star Telegram involves Joe Wright personally requesting that a plat receive approval with the deletion of "Item #11" because according to the minutes of the meeting, "it offended him". Summary Item #11 from the August 2, 1996 Plat Review Summary on ZA96-83 stated: Place the following note on the face of the plat: "Selling a portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits." The official minutes of the August 8, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting provide: f:\files\slake\letters\haw1_O I 7 • AUG-01-1997 15:37 FIELDING,BAWL c: IH LUN r.1u:'1z • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1. 1997 Page 9 Chairman Wright asked Staff why Plat Review Summary Item #11 was stated in the letter. He said that Item #11 was offensive, and he did not understand why it needed to be in the comments at all. PIanner Tom Elgin said that the statement in Item #11 is the result of a recent amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance. Commissioner Murphy made a motion to delete Summary Item #11 which was seconded by Commissioner Tate. The planning and zoning commission unanimously voted to delete this item, although it was later reinserted by the city council. It is my opinion that this action does not violate Sections 2-264(a)(3), (6), (8), or (10) or any other standards of conduct set forth in the Ethics Code. I also reviewed Section 2-265 of the Ethics Code which requires that a city of officer who has a substantial interest in any business entity or real property involved in a decision pending before such officer shall disclose such interest and shall not discuss the substance of the matter at any time. The existence of a substantial interest in either a business entity or real property must be disclosed either through an affidavit filed in connection with Section • 171.004 of the Local Government Code or in the official records of the planning and zoning commission. The requirements of Section 2-265 are similar to,yet a bit more comprehensive than, the conflict of interest provisions set forth in Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code. These provisions do not prohibit the existence of the substantial interest; instead, they prohibit the officer from voting on or participating in the deliberation of any such matter that comes before the board. As indicated above, the definition of a substantial interest is set forth in Section 2-261 of the Ethics Code. To the extent that Mr. Wright had a substantial interest in any real property or business entity which was the subject of the planning and zoning commission's consideration, he would be required to disclose this substantial interest and file the necessary affidavit, as applicable. If he failed to do so, he would be deemed to be in violation of the Ethics Code and would be subject to disciplinary action. I have not been presented with any facts which substantiate that Mr. Wright had such a substantial interest in any matters that have been raised. Finally, although I was only asked to address the applicability of the Ethics Code, I am not aware of any constitutional or statutory provisions which would prohibit any of the conduct described above. My opinions are based upon the facts presented to me. If there are different or L\files\slake\letters\hawk.017 • AUG-0 1-1997 15:37 FIELDING,BARRET 2< TA`r'LOR 8 1'r'.S.SJ4'r'41 F'.11:'1 • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 10 additional facts which you believe are relevant to a consideration of these issues, please bring them to my attention, and I will be glad to address them further. Very truly yours, Wayne K. Olson WKO/wrt cc: Mayor Rick Stacy City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 Councilmember Ralph Evans City of Southlake S 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 Councilmember Wayne Moffat City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 Councilmember Pamela Muller City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 Councilmember David Harris City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 [:\files\slake\letters\hawk.O 17 • AUG-01-1997 15:38 FIELDING,BARRET $. TAYLOR 8173324741 P.12:'12 • Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 11 Councilmember Gary Fawks City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 Councilmember Scott Martin City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake, Texas 76092 • f:\61es\slakc\Ict ten\hawk.017 S TOTAL P.12 JUL_-:0-1997 12:12 FIhLL!NU,eHNNt1 IH LUN• oiiJJG+ v • • Tex. Atty. Gen. Op. DM-309 *1199 Office of the Attorney General State of Texas Opinion No. DM-309 December 6, 1994 Re: Whether the members of the City of Dallas Planning and Zoning Commission are "local public officials" under chapter 171 of the Local Government Code and related questions (RQ-689) Honorable Fred Hill Chair Committee on Urban Affairs Texas House of Representatives Austin, Texas 78768-2910 Dear Representative Hill: You ask whether members of the City of Dallas Planning and Zoning Commission (the• "commission") are "local public officials" under chapter 171 of the Local Government Code. Specifically,you ask if the members are"local public officials"for purposes of chapter 171 when they make recommendations on proposed changes to zoning regulations or boundaries in accordance with Section 211.007(b) of the [Local Government] Code in light of the fact that Dallas has adopted an ordinance in conjunction with Section 211.006(f) of the Local Government Code that requires an affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the entire City Council to overrule a recommendation of denial by the commission. Section 211.007 of the Local Government Code provides in pertinent part: (a) To exercise the powers authorized by this subchapter, the governing body of a home-rule municipality shall, and the governing body of a general-law municipality may, appoint a zoning commission. The commission shall recommend boundaries for the original zoning districts and appropriate zoning regulations for each district. If the municipality has a municipal planning commission at the time of implementation of this subchapter, the governing body may appoint that commission to serve as the zoning commission. (b) The zoning commission shall make a preliminary report and hold public hearings • J VL—.)EJ j 7 e 1C•1G r t GLL'1:IU nnr� • . .- •-- -.., on that report before submitting a final report to the governing body. The governing body • may not hold a public hearing until it receives the final report of the zoning commission unless the governing body by ordinance provides that a public hearing is to be held, after the notice required by Section 211.006(a),jointly with a public hearing required to be held by the zoning commission. In either case, the governing body may not take action on the matter until it receives the final report of the zoning commission. Local Gov't Code s 211.007, Section 211.006(f) provides as follows: (f)The governing body by ordinance may provide that the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of all its members is required to overrule a recommendation of the municipality's zoning commission that a proposed change to a regulation or boundary be denied. Id. s 211.006. Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code governs conflicts of interest on the part of"Local public officials." "Local public official" is defined as follows: "Local public official" means a member of the governing body or another officer, whether elected, appointed, paid, or unpaid, of any district (including a school district), county, municipality, precinct, central appraisal district, transit authority or district, or other • local governmental entity who exercises responsibilities beyond those that are advisory in nature. Id. s 171.001(1). In light of the information you have provided, it is clear that a member of the commission exercises responsibilities beyond those that are advisory in nature. Thus, we conclude that a commission member is a "local public official" under the foregoing definition and therefore subject to the requirements of chapter 171. We further note that a commission member is subject to chapter 171 not just when he or she makes a recommendation specified in section 211.006(f). Rather, all of his or her acts as a commission member are subject to chapter 171. Next you ask, "Does the term'involving the business entity'used in Section 171.004(a) refer only to the business entity whose request is the subject matter of the vote or decision, or does it also include a business entity that is paid to represent the entity whose request is the subject matter of the vote or decision?" In a related question, you ask, "Does the term 'involving the business entity'used in Section 171.004(a) include a business entity that is paid to represent a person or group opposing the business entity whose request is the subject matter of the vote or decision?" We conclude that the term "business entity" includes any business entity that represents a party with an interest in a matter before the commission for the following reasons. • JUL-30-1997 12=13 FIELDING,BAPPET 2 TAYLOP 8173324141 r.U4/U Section 171.004 provides in pertinent part: • (a) If a local public official has a substantial interest in a business entityor in real property,the official shall file, before a vote or decision on any matter involving the business entity or the real property, an affidavit stating the nature and extent of the interest and shall abstain from further participation in the matter if: (1) if in the case of a substantial interest in a business entity the action on the matter will have a special economic effect on the business entity that is distinguishable from the effect on the public; or (2) in the case of a substantial interest in real property, it is reasonably foreseeable that an action on the matter will have a special economic effect on the value of the property, distinguishable from its effect on the public. (c) If a local public official is required to file and does file an affidavit under Subsection(a), the official is not required to abstain from further participation in the matter requiring the affidavit if a majority of the members of the governmental entity of which the official is a member is composed of persons who are likewise required to file and who do file affidavits of similar interests on the same official action. • Section 171.004(a)(1) requires a commission member to file an affidavit if he or she has a substantial interest in a business entity (FN1) and the action on the matter will have a special economic effect on the business entity. Id. s 171.004(a)(1). Section 171.004(a)(1) is broadly written and does not require that the business entity have a direct interest in the matter. It only requires that the action on the *1199 matter have a special economic effect on the business entity. Furthermore, chapter 171 does not confine the term "business entity" to only those business entities with a direct interest in an action. See id. s 171.001(2) (" 'Business entity' means a sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, holding company, joint-stock company, receivership, trust, or any other entity recognized by law."). We believe that section 171.004(a)(1) extends to an action of the commission that will have a special economic effect on a business entity that represents an entity or person with an interest in a matter before the commission. Whether or not a particular action will have a special economic effect on a business entity that represents an entity or person with an interest in a matter before the commission is a question of fact and is therefore beyond the purview of the opinion process. See Attorney General Opinion DM-279 (1993) at 7.A local public official commits a criminal offense if he or she knowingly fails to file an affidavit stating the nature and extent of his or her substantial interest in a business entity on which a vote or decision will have a special economic effect, as required by section 171.004. See Local Gov't Code s 171.003. • JUL-30-1997 12:13 FIELDING,BAPPET `a TAYLOP r S - " +1 r•���:"��� *1200 Summary • A member of the City of Dallas Planning and Zoning Commission(the "commission") is a "local public official" subject to the requirements of chapter 171 of the Local Government Code. Section 171.004(a)(1) extends to an action of the commission that will have a special economic effect on a business entity that represents an entity or person with an interest in a matter before the commission. Yours very truly, Dan Morales Attorney General of Texas Jorge Vega First Assistant Attorney General Drew T. Durham Deputy Attorney General for Criminal Justice Javier Aguilar • Special Assistant Attorney General Renea Hicks State Solicitor Sarah J. Shirley Chair, Opinion Committee Prepared by Mary R. Crouter Assistant Attorney General FN1 A person has a "substantial interest in a business entity" if (i) the person owns ten percent or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity or owns either ten percent or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity or (ii) funds received by the person from the business entity exceed ten percent of the person's gross income for the previous year. See Local Gov't Code s 171.002(a). • TOTAL P.05 AUG-0i-1997 16:32 FIELDING,BAPPET a TA`r'LOP 9173324741 P.02/06 i TAYLOR, OLSON, ADKINS, SRALLA & ELAM, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW S500 THROCKMORTON STREET TELEPHONE(817)332.7580 3400 BANK ONE TOWER FAX(817)3324740 FORT wORTH.TEXAS 76102.3821 w'AYNE K.OLSON August 1, 1997 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 1725 E. 1709 Southlake. Texas 76092 RE: Recent "Cinemark" Decision Dear Curtis: You asked me to explain the impact of the recent Fifth Circuit ruling involving the "Cinemarke property. This is the same property that was involved in the Dallas Court of Appeals case styled, Bartlett v. Cinemark U.S.A. Inc., 908 S.W.2d 229 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1995, no writ). You may recall that on July 5, 1995 I sent the mayor and councilmembers • a letter regarding the issues in that case. I am attaching a copy of that letter for your information. Let me bring you up to date on the status of these cases. Three separate lawsuits were filed against the City of Dallas arising out of the city's denial of a site plan for the construction of a 'Tinsletown" theater by Cinemark U.SA Inc. The original Cinemark case was also filed against the individual city councilmembers who voted against the site plan. In that case, the Dallas Court of Appeals held that the individual councilmembers were not entitled to summary judgment on this issue of good faith immunity because there were legitimate fact questions as to whether they had in fact acted in good faith. The Cinemark court found that the-approval of a development or site plan as opposed to the approval of zoning did not involve a legislative decision. Further, the court questioned whether the council had any discretion to deny the site plan in light of the fact that it was a ministerial duty for the council to approve it. Cinemark sued the individual councilmembers and the city for $40 million which were the actual damages sustained by the company. You may recall, to avoid potential liability, the city settled the case for S5 million. The second case was brought by the broker on the property and was settled by the city for a nominal undisclosed dollar amount. III (=Milts\slake\leuers\hawk.018 AUG-01-1997 16:33 FIELDING•BAPPET & TAYLOP 8173324741 P.03/06 • S Mr. Curtis Hawk August 1, 1997 Page 2 The third case which was decided on July 17, 1997 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is styled Mayfair Development Corp. v. City of Dallas. As opposed to the Cinemark case, the Mayfair case was decided on substantive due process grounds rather than immunity grounds. Mayfair had likewise originally sued the individual city councilmembers in addition to the city, but at the strong suggestion of the City of Dallas, the individual councilmembers had been non-suited in an attempt to try to negotiate a settlement. The City of Dallas then filed a motion for summary judgment based on the issuable fact doctrine adopted by the Fifth Circuit in Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475 (5th Cir. 1986). The city argued that even though there was arguably a violation of state law and the city's own ordinances, the denial of the site plan did not amount to a substantive due process violation. Judge Barefoot Sanders agreed and granted a summary judgment and the Fifth Circuit upheld the summary judgment. In so ruling, the Fifth Circuit adopted the Shelton issuable fact doctrine which basically says that if there is "any conceivable rational basis" for a zoning decision, it will be upheld. The Fifth Circuit specifically noted that "the city council furnished a number of reasons for its rejection of the development plan; given the presumption of validity we accord such findings, we cannot conclude that the city council lacked a `conceivable rational basis' for its action." • What can we learn from all of this? The presumption of validity accorded zoning decisions has again been affirmed by the Fifth Circuit and has been applied to the site plan approval process. The federal courts found that the City of Dallas was able to articulate enough valid reasons to uphold the regulation. However, in reality the city denied the site plan because the neighbors didn't like it. The individual councilmembers who voted against the site plan were denied qualified immunity because they were not able to prove that they had acted in good faith. For $5 million plus dollars, the City of Dallas was able to get out of this mess. There is really nothing new to be learned from this case_ As always, rational zoning decisions will be upheld if they are done right. However, arbitrary and unreasonable zoning decisions which are made solely to affirm public sentiment can prove to be costly. I would be glad to discuss these cases in more detail with the planning and zoning commission and city council should you desire. In the meantime, if you have any additional questions, please let me know. Very truly yours, („)k Wayne K Olson • WKO/wrt PUG-01-1997 16:33 FIELDING.BPPPET 2, TAYLOP 817332-3741 P.04,'06 FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS 3100 BANK ONE TOWER 500 THROCKMORTON STREET • FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102-3821 TELEPHONE(817)332-2580 (800)318-3400 FAX(817)332-4740 WAYNE K. OLSON July 5, 1995 Hon. Mayor Gary Fickes Members of the City Council City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Individual Immunity of City Council Members Dear Mayor Fickes and City Council Members: Because we have discussed in the past the potential liability of city council members in performing their governmental functions, I wanted to bring to your attention what could be a fairly far-reaching decision with regard to the individual immunity of council members • involved in making zoning decisions. In Bartlett v. Cinemark USA, Inc., 1995 WL 376501 (Tex. App.--Dallas), which was decided by the Dallas Court of Appeals on June 13, 1995, individual council members who were sued for denying a "PD" Planned Development site plan were denied individual immunity on summary judgment. You may remember the details of this case from newspaper and news stories last year. Around ten years ago, the Dallas City Council approved a planned development district and conceptual plan for a 22-acre tract of land. Two years ago, Cinemark USA, Inc. submitted a development plan to construct an 18-screen movie theater and restaurant,which was vigorously opposed by the surrounding neighborhoods. The City Council voted to reject the development plan, concluding that the proposed theater was not a permitted use on the property because the previously approved conceptual plan suggested that the property could only be used for retail and office uses. The Court of Appeals disagreed, noting that the PD ordinance specifically permitted any use allowed in the SC shopping center district, which included theaters. f:\h7cs\slake\ktrcrs\immuni tyJrr • HUU-:J1-1yy"r' 1b l N 1 tLL 1 NU.LHNNI 1 _ I H iLU 1.33G4(41 F'.1J5/{416 Hon. Mayor • Members of the City Council July 5, 1995 Page 2 Under federal law, government officials are entitled to immunity in the exercise of their discretionary and legislative functions. An official is entitled to qualified good-faith immunity while exercising discretionary functions and absolute immunity while exercising legislative functions. The establishment of an immunity defense in a lawsuit is typically taken care of by summary judgment. In the Cinemark case, the mayor and individual council members filed motions for summary judgment claiming that they were immune from liability, but the trial court and the Dallas Court of Appeals denied their motions. The Court of Appeals acknowledged that zoning is ordinarily a legislative activity which affords city council members absolute immunity. However, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the vote of the city council in denying a development plan should not be considered legislative because it was based upon specific facts related to particular individuals or situations rather than generalizations concerning a policy, law or state of affairs. In the Cinemark case, the city council was deciding whether the theater was a permitted use on the property, whether the development plan adequately addressed the • internal vehicular circulation, etc. The Court concluded that these facts are more properly characterized as facts affecting a specific situation and specific individuals, and therefore the council members were not entitled to legislative immunity. The Court next reviewed whether the council members should be entitled to qualified good-faith immunity in the performance of a discretionary act. The Court of Appeals concluded that the council members failed to prove that their vote to deny the development plan was a discretionary act. The Court intimated that the act should be considered a ministerial act which simply requires obedience to orders or the performance of a duty to which the actor has no choice. The Court reviewed the Dallas Development Code and found nothing to indicate that the actions taken by the council members were discretionary as opposed to ministerial. The Court was also persuaded by the fact that development plans for PD districts are normally reviewed by the Dallas Plan Commission, but on this particular project, the city council provided for its own review rather than by the Plan Commission. Although the reasoning of the Court of Appeals was somewhat skewed, it does show a potential for other courts to conclude that site-specific approvals of site plans, specific use permits, etc. would be considered non-legislative, thereby negating any right to absolute immunity. Also, the Cinemark decision, if upheld by the Texas Supreme Court, would allow f:\files\slake\letters\immu nity.l tr • AUG-01-1997 16:3-1 FIELDING,BAPPET 2. TAYLOP 81/5344741 P.06/06 Hon. Mayor Members of the City Council July 5, 1995 Page 3 individual council members to be sued for the denial of site plans and permits that are in full compliance with the underlying zoning. Under this theory, city council members could be liable for trying to restrict development by withholding approval of permits and site plans which comply with the underlying zoning. The purpose of this letter is merely to advise you of a current ruling which could have future impact upon city council zoning decisions. I or other members of my law firm will, of course, be available to discuss these types of issues in more detail at future council meetings; or if you prefer to address this over the phone, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, Wayne K. Olson • WKOIIf cc: Curtis E. Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Allen Taylor - FB&T Analeslie Muncy - FB&T Debra Drayovitch - FB&T Betsy Elam - FB&T f:\ftletAslake\letterAimmunity.ltr • TOTAL P.06 JUL-00-199r 17 14 FIELDING.BAP.PET TA`r'LOP 317332 37 i1 P.02/0 1 I CAUSE NO. 342-169049-97 TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS X IN THE DISTRICT COURT X VS. X TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS X CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS et al X 342ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT I O ANDUM OPINION The only issue that will be addressed by this Memorandum Opinion is whether the Town of Westlake has shown itself to be entitled to a Temporary Restraining Order to maintain the status quo pending this Court hearing evidence on an application for Temporary Injunction. The argument heard in court on July 29, I997, and the briefing by the parties has been helpful. The • appropriate standard for making this preliminary decision is set forth in Rule 680 T.R_C.P. In Tarrant County we follow a Local Rule (3.30(c)), which this Court believes is important and necessary to prevent any abuse of the Temporary Restraining Order practice. This may however have the unfortunate effect of clouding the procedures set out in Rule 680 T.R.C.P. Although we have heard argument for and against the issuance of the Temporary Restraining Order sought by Westlake in this case, the Court has heard no evidence. There having been no evidence heard and there having been no opportunity for cross-examination of witnesses, it is important to note that Rule 680 T.RC.P. provides that the party or parties restrained may move for the dissolution or modification of the restraint. The rule goes on to say that the Court will then proceed to hear the motion to dissolve or modify"as expeditiously as the ends of justice require". It is at this "expeditiously" scheduled hearing that the first testimony is to be heard. f JUL-_�i-1997=,g^ 1 1� F I ELD I NG,EAPPET aTA`i LOP 81^JJ?�^�� P,03:'p4 • Until testimony is heard it is inappropriate for the Court to make even a preliminary determination of success on the merits. I will therefore apply the language of Rule 680 and require only a preliminary showing of immediate and irreparable harm. I make no determination at this point of whether one side or the other is likely to prevail on the merits of the case. On April 29, 1997, in another of the Westlake cases, this Court entered an order attempting to maintain the status quo in and around Westlake until evidence could be heard the following morning. It was impossible then to anticipate how complicated the Westlake "penumbra" would become in the days and weeks that followed. But looking now through the retrospectoscope of hindsight, much of the time and energy expended since then could have been avoided had this Court been allowed to hear testimony, review evidence, and make a record that would then have been subject to review. That first witness was never called to testify. This piece of the puzzle filed against Southlake and the owners of the Solana complex is • an effort to address the various actions taken by the dueling mayors and Boards of Aldermen. The Second Amended Application for Injunctive Relief alleges that Southlake has begun zoning,has posted city limits signs, has provided municipal services and has asserted claims to sales taxes and other revenues stemming from the use of Solana. There is also an allegation that certain other actions "can be expected". The lesson taught by the days and weeks following April 29, 1997, is that what "can be expected" in this case is limited only by the collective imagination of the lawyers. I denied the First Request for Temporary Restraint upon the candid representations of Southlake's counsel that they were taking only steps to be certain the Solana complex would be in either Westlake or Southlake. Those steps are evidently complete, Although requested, I have been provided no explanation for why Southlake felt it was necessary to post city limit signs. If JUL-30-1997 1" 1 FIELDING.BAPPET « TH'r'LOP 8173�247 11 P.O 3:"��3 S that is due to the short amount of time allowed for the briefing, it is understandable, and perhaps that issue can be addressed at the hearing. Further, unless there is "ground about to be broken" in Solana, I see no reason for Southlake going forward with any zoning. I am now even more convinced that the April 29, 1997, order attempting to maintain the status quo was appropriate. This Court could have moved through the issues in a logical and orderly fashion expedited to do justice. I have been denied that, so we deal with what is before us. If maintaining the status quo pending a hearing was correct, it is correct on each piece of the puzzle. I will therefore grant the Temporary Restraining Order and agree to provide an evidentiary hearing expeditiously should the parties restrained seek to dissolve or modify the order. As noted above, I only find in granting the relief sought that maintaining the status quo is appropriate to prevent immediate and irreparable harm. I make no prediction without hearing evidence whether one side or the other might win. Counsel for Westlake is invited to prepare an • appropriate document for entry consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. Date: July 30, 1997 Judge • TOTAL P.04 JUL-31-1997 10:09 F I ELD I r+G,BAPPET a TAYLOP 8173324741 P.02/12 Law Orates Goias,Uuderkoasr,Crawford&Laagdon A Registered Limited Liability Partnership• 1601 Elm Street, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 15201 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TELEPHONE (214)969-5454 FAX(214)969-5902 DATE: July 31, 1997 NUMBER OF PAGES: 10 (excluding cover sheet) DELIVER TO: E. Allan Taylor, Jr., Esq. - (817) 332-4740 W.Edward Waits,II,Esq.-(214)651-433) SENDER James W.Morris, Jr.,Esq. Coins, Underkoder, Crawford& Langdon A Registered Limited Liability Partnership 1601 Elm Street, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-5454 FACS NUMBER: (214) 969-5902 (Compatible with G1, G2 and G3 Models) • SUBJECT: WestlskeiSouthlake Proposed Order COMMENTS: If you do not receive all sheets,please call Annette at(214) 969-5454 as soon as possible. Client Number: 2740 Mauer Number. 006 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This information contained in and transmitted with this facsimile is: 1. SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE; 2. ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; OR 3. CONFIDENTIAL it is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this facsimile by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please notify Gains, Underkofler, Crawford & Langdon by telephone at (214) 969.5454 immediately. Any facsimile erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately returned to the sender by U.S. Mail, or if authorization is granted by the sender,destroyed. • , JUL-31-1997 1O:c39 PIELDIrc,BARRET & TAYLOR 8173324741 P.03/12 SRe: Cause No.342-169138-97; Town of Westlake,Texas v. City of Southlake, Texas, et al. Gentlemen: Pursuant to the Court's July 30, 1997 ruling in this matter, we are sending the Court the enclosed proposed Order on Plaintiffs Application for Temporary Restraining Order and requesting that it be entered by the Court. Should you have arty questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CW. Morris,Jr. JwM1r/as Enclosure V4O.c% /39596 S S , JUL-31-189? 103:09 F I ELD I r+G.BAPPET & TAYLOP 81733247-11 P.poi 12 NO. 342-169138-97 TOWN OF WESTI AKE, TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § VS_ § CITY OF SOUTKLAKE, TEXAS; Maguire/ § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake § Partnership; Maguire Partners Westlake § Partnership; and MTP-IBM Phase II and § III Joint Venture, § pendant § 342ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SEOW CAUSE Upon the verified application of The Town of Westlake ("Westlake' for tempo- rary restraining order the Court finds that Westlake has made a. sufficient showing under Rule 680 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure that (1) the Solana Complex was • in Westlake; (2) Solana is owned by the McGuire/Thomas Defendants; (3) that Southlake is exercising jurisdiction over Solana by posting signs indicating Solana is in the corporate limits of Southlake, posting signs indicating Southlake is hearing zoning changes on Solana, purporting to provide emergency services to Solana, Southlake is purporting to zone the Solana property and SouthiakP is contending that f i Solana is within its borders for purposes of collecting sales and franchise taxes from Solana; (4) such actions. threaten immediate and irreparable harm to the Town of Westlake for which it has no adequate remedy at law unless a temporary injunction is granted restraining such actions; it is therefore ORDERED that Defendants The City of Southlake, Texas, McGuire/Thomas Partners, McGuire Partners Westlake Partnership, and MTP-ISM Phase II and Phase III Joint Venture (collectively `Defendants') appear and show cause on the • rbk OMA STAR IING ORDER AND ORDER PRE 1 TO sttoWCAOSE-274O.006,n722:39792 JUL-31-1997 10:09 F I ELD I NG BcPPET 3. TH'iLCP 8173324741 P.05/12 • day of , 1997 -at o'clock .m. in the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas why an order should not be entered granting to Westlake a temporary injunction precluding Defendants and all of their attorneys, contractors, officers, elected officials, agents, servants, employees and all persons acting in concert with it from: (a) making, accepting or processing any applications for development permits, or subdivision plats for land in Westlake community known as Solana (as more fully described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A), including, but not limited to, any applications for site plan review, building permits, grading permits, certificates of occupancy, master or concept plans, preh'r iiltinry, final, record- ing, or any other classification of subdivision plats; (b) making or acting on any applications to Southlakr to establish or amend zoning regulations for Solana, including but not limited to, holding public • hearings, whether before the planning and zoning commission or similar body, or the city council, considering recommendations for their inclusion in particular zoning classifications or planned developments, and considering recommendations on site plans or other development plans; (c) taking steps to request from or to have provided by Southlake water facilities, provision of roads, streets, and.-ararnage facilities, installation of street lighting, and other services to Solana; (d) taking any other actions related to application or acceptance, processing and approval of development applications for Solana by Southlake; (e) taking any actions which abrogate or conflict with Westlake's rights to promulgate and enforce development regulations on Solana • T1lOL4� RAINING O!!DE![,I AND ORDf.R last 1 TO SNOW -2710.00d/022:39792 JUL-31-1997 10: 10 F JELL Ir4G.Bs=4'PPET & TAYLOP 8173324741 P.06/12 (f) from taking any actions which abrogate or conflict with Westlake's • rights to plan and provide for essential and adequate facilities and services to Solana; (g) maintaining or posting signs or notices indicating or stating that Solana is in Southlake, and Southlake is further ordered to remove all such signs that curt tly exist; and (h) collecting or attempting to collect any taxes from Solana_ which will cause immediate and irreparable harm and damage to Westlake for which there is no adequate remedy at law because it will lose its sovereign rights ova So- lana_ It is further ORDERED that pending the hearing on Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Injunction or the expiration of 14 days from the date hereof, whichever shall first oc- cur, Defendants, their attorneys, contractors, officers, elected officials, agents, ser- vants, employees, and all persons or entities acting in concert with it are hereby di- rected to immediately cease and desist from: (a) making, accepting or processing any applications for development permits, or subdivision plats for Solana, including, but not limited to, any applica- tions for site plan review, building permits, grading permits, certificates of occupancy, master or concept plans, preliminary, fsnal, recording, or any other cla fication of subdivision plats; e (b) making or acting on any applications to Southlake to establish or amend zoning regulations for Solana, including but not limited to, holding public hearings, whether before the planning and zoning commission or airnilar body, or the city council, considering recommendations for their inclusion in particular zoning classifications or planned developments, and considering recommendations on site plans or other development plans; • TEMPO KING ER An'D ORDER.. 3 Tb.SbfOR' !!SE•27�0 Opy0t2ORD�39�92 Z646f 1t0r900 O?2 t•2sn rr"moor al mar rsoxo a,vr Egamo avnvrvl►s.sarX►r 101H71 • 9d aoaar -ca=naora,0 1e 'L66I 'd nr;o ABP s (1-quo's -apo� soTpatua sous uoll3r4d/IAb sUX I.alp 3o ZOO-g ¢ o; luetisind szpso VursTriluas £sodtmal a so; ;uatuastnbas puoq atp wog Zdtuaxa st ajsaM ;rug ptre LpmpatataT 1a-413;2 c=c 2q sapio 2277e./1s9s eIesod=43 stt:r4 Zeal a uua o sat inn si 11 Eusj -oS sato s;z{Sts uStaraoos szt asoi met. 2s71:63aq esVI Lpatrzzs 2;enbape ou Si aia41 IP? i SatP131H ofatrarup pyre murep atgesedaut ptr¢ alQtpourun tPTtltsi • laratIos vaos;yarn Eau ioanoo of Stsgdtual.re so aupaaTioo (q) pure 'Istxa Aptsas -ISO 2ep1 s11 is t{atts Tug aeotuu of posap.xx st a nos pue '.0 tL t.tu os ul st euepos 11771 2u irls so Suprotptn saapou so silts 2upsod so Zulu eluTrt z (2) trurtos m szpops.tou pur 114ttP ZEtt'PE Puu tsgtxassa so;aptn.osd pus tzrTd of slt u s,asTeTisam lilies latjpsoo so al-ta2O2ge trzttTm snip Sur 2u al tuos3 ( ) tguvjos uo stioA u luauadopesp xasojua pub o/u2inu o.sd of sltt2u sganErpsatil trtei 3Tff UQo so 21r2oIge tTptttm stsop.,e due tut v (o) :d,tzi-q3nos dq.eurios so; suotlrotiddh ltnusdopeap Jo Tenosdde puu $tr<ssaooid `aouuldaaaE sa uoptrocTddr of polgps suopas (P) `-etzetos 431 =was I tT1�,2tztzrC4tt 1301ls 3o uoRripalcut 'sapttrpe; aSeutesp pure 'slaa.zls 'speos;o uotsinosd 'saruutt3e; iazem aietti moS Paptnusd want o; so uzos; lsanbas o3 sdals 2upr3 (o) • zt/ 2 d TrLrE2ELT8 2l01J.t11 8 13ddti8"JNIQI3I� OT :@T L66T-T2-111-lf JUL-31-1997 10: 11 F I ELD I NG•EAPPET ?. TAll_GP 9173.324741 P.08/12 •- LAND DESCRIPTION FOR THE PORTION OF SOLA.NA tieing all that may, ooasmonly known as Solana and more particularly described as 'A". "B" and "C' as follows_ mil' ?mil Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.S. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134. the T.W. Mann Survey. Abstract No. 1107. the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1952, and the C.M. Throop Survey. Abstract No. 1510, Tarr::te County. Tacna and mote partitjy dexri'bad as the W Park, Add No.to the Town of Westlake a recorded In Volume 331-214,Pag1:3 7E and 79. Map&Plat Rewords of Tarn= County. Texas, including the teplat of Lots 1 R and 2R. Mock 2 of the WestialteilSoodalakc Park, Addition Na I to the Town of Weidakr as recorded In Cabinet A., Slide No. 223. Map and Pest Records of Tanya County. Texas. Being a acre tract of land sinutoxi in the William Peat Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas. the same being Alin Number 1045. Denton Survey. Abaztaer Number �', Texas; the 1. Henry Survey County. Texas; Tows,the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 19513, Tarrant Cam, Texas and the C ILL Throop Survey, Abstract Number 15I0, Tarrant County, Ted, all located in northern Tar County and spa Destton County,Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those maces described in deeds to Trdcmational Business Machines Corporation. halter • referred to as IBM. as recorded in Volume 7376,Page 1728;V9lut io 7373, Page 2020;Vale 7351, Page 1940; valuate 7264, Page (42; Vet 7926, Page 1452; Volume Volume 7940, Page 167, and alsoadescribed 171; IBM as being �°a of�O701Q tracts of land desaY'bod in deeds to cccardcd in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376_Page 20E7;and Volume 7376,Page 1765, Deed Re.nrdc, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: 13EGINNINO at a 5/8 inch iron rod in the southerly right-of-way of State Htghvay No_ 114 (variable width), being the most northerly northweste corner of said tract or land recorded in Volume 7376, Page 17211,said Deed Records, and the nortbeast. corner of that certain met of land conveyed to R. C1and1e- as rerded ici Voithne 1139. Page S$d, Deed Records. Denton County, Tcica. co �TTTENCE along ng the southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway 113, the following uriS 71° 03'21' E, 3458.57 feet for the beginning of a curve to the right: Along said curve an arc distance of 838.33 feet, through a central angle of 27' 21' S9", having a radius of 1859.86 feet, sect a long chord of S 57. 22' 21" E, 879.91 feet; tvia,,,0 90090r CICVL57\21S77,a.net Page 1 of S • JUL-31-1997 10: 11 FIELDING,BAPPET 3. TAYLOR 81/S.324741 P.09/12 • S 25° 37' 35" W, 108.56 feet to the beginning of a Hurt-ungeat corn to the right Along said non-tangeut curve and m distance of 196.SS fee% through a drat angle of 06° 1 S' 2 5", having a radius of 1799.86 feet,and a long chord of S 39*40' 011" E, 196,46 fats to a conartc Texas Highway Department monument S36.° 32' 25" E, 215.14 fee t; THENCE leaving said rigid-of-way, West. 2141.45 feet; "1 a CE S 52' 00' OO" W, 1000.00 feet; THENCE South. 1882.23 feet m the north lint of that cezttin tract of land conveyed to liowsrd Dudley et mx as recorded in Volamc 4888, Page 622, said Deed Records; THENCE N 89° 57' 44' W,200.93 feet to the northwest coact of said Andlcy tract,also being in the south lint of said IBM tract as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1765; THENCE N 00° 2D' 49" E, 45.01 feet; THENCE N 89° 39' 10" W, along the mirth line of Raaaabe Dove Road(variable width). 1346.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right: • THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a variable width right-of-way the following cot and distant Along said curve to the right an arc di•zimtor of 241.85 fat,through a central angle of 89° 45' 10", having a rudiw of 154.38 feet, sad a long chord of N 44° 46' 35" W, 217.86 foci; N 00° 06' DO" R, 977.90 feet. N 00° 08' 31' W. 394.37 feet, � Z N 00° 10' 13" .W. 551.671 N 02° 20' 32" 1:, 554.17 feet, N 28° 49' 02" E. 164.88 feet, N 23° 30' 55" E, 9R.16 feet, N 12° 46' 54' E, 100.00 feet, N 00' 16' 1 g" W, 993.50 feet to the sourhwest comer of the afor ened R. Chandler trdL-t; • e ire VESIVesnar x Page 2 of 5 JUL-31-1997 1©: 11 FIELLIr�G.BAPPET .. TA,LOP 8115_523^J1 P,10/12 THENCE N 89°47' Q0"E along the southerly line of said It der Tract,258.02 feet, • THENCE N CO° 30' 28" W along the mealy line of said R. Chandler tract, 505.33 fort to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 232.921 acres of lend more or less, save and except appmxitiuutly 20 acres dedicated to the State nf Texas fa State Flghursy No. 114 right- of-way. PARC12. "C" Being all that certain Bart of lead in the W. Medlin Survey,Abstract 1958, and the C.M.Troop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant Ctxmly, 'Texas. This tract of land ata&acea the tracts described in deeds to lnte moral BtMine= Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and recorded in Volume 8795,Page 553, Dead Rids of Tarrant County,Texas. Said tract is more particularly desaiibod as follows: Beginning at a point its the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 30811 (a:so know as West T.W. King Road), a variable width roadway, said point also bang on the fly tight-of--way of S.H. 114, a variable width roadway: Thence along the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114,N 36' 32' 30' W. 5S7.00 feet Thence [caving the northeasterly right-of-way of-way of S.H. 114 as follows: N 53' 29' 00" E, 546.74 feet, • S 03e 07' 00" W, 34450 feet to a point in the muter/ins of County Road 3088, N 89° 28' 00" W, 25.00 feet to the westcriy right-of-way of County Road No. 3088, said right- of-way also being the westerly limits of the City of Soutlalake. Thence along the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 and the westerly limits of t c City of Southl'hr, S 00° 33' 00• W. 51410 feet. Thence S 72° 03' 00" W, 47.70 feet to.the l*: Of Segirming and containing 3.9419 acres,mare or feu, save and cxcepc any right-of--way dedications to the Some or Texas for State Highway No. 114. >�c'i,U SI01v s�gONL AI SJ1AiNF�cATi rnv Save and except those portions of said Pa:rcis "A" and "B'more particularly described as Strips No. I and No.. 2 as follow= SIP NO, 1 !Icing a portion of said Pared 'W its described above, said portion being a strip of land 50 feet wide, the westerly line of said 50 foot strip de cribed as foil:sum Beginning at the northwest comer of said tract of land &scribed by deed recorded in • ortnr4.9xinocsvisivisalczes Page 3 of 5 JU_-31-1997 1a= i2 r IELDIuG,Ec=FEET 3. TAYLGP 8173321741 P. 11/12 volume 7376, Page 172i, said nordrovest comer also being the southwest Fez of the R Chandler tract described by deed recorded is Voltunc 1139.Page 580, Deed Records of Demon County, Texas_ Said corner also being in the easterly right-of-way of Prncutet Lite Rend. Thence 1250 feet to asoutherly wag the dy right-of-way of Precinct Liar Road y point approsirnatety 50 feel south of the intersection of the westerly ri .,,,a of Precinct Line Road and the north line of the Scott Bradley Tract as described by deed recorded in Volume 6395, Page 67,Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said SO feet strip 1.4 acres, tt;ore or Icss. 8 TRIP N4. 2 Being a portion of Parcels 'A" and "13' as described above. also bang a strip of land SO feet wide the sout,aiy line of said strip &aerated as follows Beginning at the northeast coin of the Alvin P. Olen Jr. man described by deed u ra girded in Volume 4121, Page 644, Deed Reenrds of Tarrant Courtly, Tessa, said cow also being in the south line of tut 1. Block 3 of the WestlskelSoutblake Park, Addtdon No. I tea the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volatile 318-214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence westerly along the tenth line of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 1466.76 feet to a point in the east tine of the Howard Dudley tract deaczibed by deed as recorded in Volume 4888, Page 622, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Taxes; Thence northerly along the out lime of said Dudley tract.acid line also being the westerly • line of said Lot 1. Block 3 spp:nxima1ely 460.91 feet to a point in the northeast comer of said Dudley tract, said corner aLse being in the sash line:of said Lot 1. Block 3; Thence westerly along the south line of sad Lot 1. Block 3.said Zinc also bed the north line of said Dudley tract, approximately 1774.98 feet to the southwestern corner of said Lot I, Flock 3. said corner also being in the north line of said Dudley tract; Thence generally westerly along the north line of mad Dudley tract add line also being the south line of Parcel 'B" as des:riibed above, approximately 1 Q0.93 feet: Thence generally northerly leaving the nerds tine of said Dudley tract approximately 95 (reset. Thence generally westerly, parallel to the north right-of-way of Dove Road (a variable width road*-ty). approximately 1396.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right. Thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 241.85 feet, having a coal angle of 81' 45.' IU", a radius of 154.3E feet and whose long chord bears N 44 46' 35• W, Thence generally northerly. parallel to the cast right-of-way of Paz..:t+c.t. Line Road approximately 50 feet, t itoreiss++or ctemmaisr Page 4of5 • JU_-31-1997 10: 12 FIELDING.BAPPET & TAYLOP 81 ti��7ai P.12/12 � Theme generally Precinct Road; warmly approximately SO feet ID point in the mist right-of-way of • -1a CF generally northerly approximately 600 feet el mg tltn east right-of-wily o'er Lim Rand to a point approximately SO feetnorth of the intetatetiort of the westerlyright-of-way of t'roiact Line Road and the northerly line of the HIIlaaod/IOti tract as did by deed as recorded in Volue 12260,Pale 194S,Dodd Records of Tacna County,TOM,said S0 foot cO app roximately 7.1 acres, more or lent. �. strip • .; tArlAro 1aewe nerwevtlirail ntAILLOCS Pape 5 of$ O TOTAL P. 12 f DEAR SOUTHLAKE CHIEF OF POLICE, • I WOULD LIKE TO COMMEND TWO OF YOUR OFFICERS FOR COMING TO OUR ASSISTANCE ON JUNE 27TH. I WAS TAKING MY DAUGHTER AND TWO OF HER FRIENDS TO EAT IN GRAPEVINE FOR MY DAUGHTER'S 13TH BIRTHDAY WHEN WE RAN OUT OF GAS. I HAVE NEVER HAD THAT HAPPEN BEFORE. ACROSS FROM A BANK AN OFFICER WHO ALSO TEACHES HIGH SCHOOL WAS DIRECTING TRAFFIC NEAR 1709 AND 114. HE SAID HE WOULD SEND HELP. I AM SORRY I DO NOT KNOW HIS NAME BUT HE WAS VERY HELPFUL. HE SENT SERGEANT BEN BROWN TO HELP AND HE WAS VERY KIND ALSO. HE WOULD NOT ACCEPT MONEY FOR THE GAS BECAUSE HE SAID IT WAS ONLY A DOLLAR. I AM ENCLOSING A CHECK FOR $20 TO USE FOR HELPING SOMEONE ELSE WHEREVER YOU SEE THE NEED. I TEACH SCHOOL IN KELLER AND I SEE AND APPRECIATE HOW MUCH POLICE OFFICERS HELP IN THEIR COMMUNITIES. I HAVE WRITTEN SERGEANT BROWN A THANK YOU NOTE BUT PLEASE THANK THE OTHER OFFICER FOR ME ALSO. ` ct-a , SINCERELY, ,S1 - 7_2i-97 City of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 23, 1997 • TO: Mike Starr, Firefighter, Fire Services FROM: Rick Black, Battalion Commander, Fire Services SUBJECT: Citizen Commendation On July 22, 1997, I received a phone call from Carol Villa. Mrs. Villa expressed her thanks to the department and to Mike Starr for the demonstration he provided to a group of children celebrating a birthday. Mrs. Villa stated that you were patient with the kids, making them all feel special. This exposure is intended to give back to the community what they have given to us as employees. I commend you for the professional demeanor and attitude you have displayed towards the departments public education program. RB/rb 4! cc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson, Deputy Director of Fire Services Ron Testerman, Lieutenant, Fire Services DPS 72 Hour Board 411! . *.t �2 q-ci2 • ip City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 5, 1997 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 5:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and attached herein. Executive session will be held from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. • 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meetings held on July 15, 1997 and July 22, 1997. 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report. C. SPIN Report. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consent: • City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 2 A. Request to advertise for bids for the community stage at Bicentennial Park. B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for Carroll I.S.D. No. 2, 7-8-9 grade secondary school located on the west side of North White Chapel Boulevard, approximately 200' north of the intersection of Chapel Downs and North White Chapel Boulevard. C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for The Village at Timarron, Phase I, located on the south side of West Southlake Boulevard, at the southeast corner of West Southlake Boulevard and Byron Nelson Parkway. D. Authorization to advertise for bids for a 12-inch water line along the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard from Dove Street to the existing Kirkwood Boulevard and enter into an agreement with MTP/IBM for the 12-inch water line. E. Resolution No. 97-57, Appointment of Barry Friedman as SPIN #13 • Representative. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-247, 2nd reading (ZA 97-074), Rezoning on property described as approximately 485 acres, known as Solana and situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas, and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County, Texas. Location: South and west of State Highway No. 114, east of Precinct Line Road, and north of the Town of Westlake. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of"NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. S Owners: International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners-Westlake Partnership, i City of Southlake,Texas 0 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 3 and MTP-IBM Phases II & III Joint Venture. SPIN Neighborhood undetermined. PUBLIC HEARING. B. Ordinance No. 480-241, 2nd reading (ZA 97-034), Rezoning of 320 West Highland, being approximately 6.311 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being Tract 8D. Location: 320 West Highland Street, being on the north side of West Highland Street approximately 800' west of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Highland Street. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Terry Robert Seaborn. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING. C. ZA 97-068, Site Plan for an emergency animal hospital, on the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Stonebridge Park, on property legally described as being approximately 0.65 acres situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and a portion of Tract 2D. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 550' west of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Randol Mill Drive. Current zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. Owner: N.T.V.M.G. Applicant: William E. Hickey. SPIN Neighborhood #16 PUBLIC HEARING. D. Ordinance No. 480-248, 2nd reading, (ZA 97-080), Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.2983 acres. Location: West side of South Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Boardwalk Avenue and South Peytonville Avenue. Current zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Requested zoning is "RE" Residential Estate District. Owners and Applicants: Brandon and Charlotte Baker. SPIN Neighborhood #14. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Ordinance No. 480-246, 2nd reading (ZA 97-055). Rezoning of approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. Location: Approximately 200' east of the 3400 block of Crooked Lane. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "0-1" Office District. Owner/Applicant: Ken Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7. III PUBLIC HEARING. , • City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 4 F. Ordinance No. 480-249, 1st reading (ZA 97-083), Rezoning and Concept Plan for T.W. King Water Storage Tank and Telecommunications Tower on property legally described as 4.5 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. Location: West side of T.W. King Road approximately 700' south of the intersection of West Bob Jones Road and T.W. King Road. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of"CS" Community Service District. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #1. G. Resolution No. 97-55, (ZA 97-084), Specific Use Permit for T.W. King Telecommunication Tower, on property legally described as 4.5 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. Location: West side of T.W. King Road approximately 700' south of the intersection of West Bob Jones Road and T.W. King Road. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "CS" Community Service District. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #1. PUBLIC HEARING. rH. ZA 97-086, Revised Concept Plan for Southlake Woods and Stonebury, on property legally described as being approximately 73.9846 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, being Tracts 2A4, 2A5, and a portion of 2A2 the T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502, being Tracts 1D, 2, 2A, 2A2, 2A3, and 2B; and being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: North of Continental Boulevard, west of Peytonville Avenue, east of Davis Boulevard, and south of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Dowdey, Anderson, and Associates, Inc. Owner: Toll Brothers, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #14 and #15. PUBLIC HEARING. I. ZA 97-087, Revised Preliminary Plat for Southlake Woods and Stonebury, being legally described as 113.04 acres being Tracts 2A4, 2A5, and 2A2, in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; Tracts 1D, 2, 2A, 2A2, 2A3, and 2B, T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502; a Plat Revision of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Airpark Estates, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 99, P.R.T.C.T. and being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: North of Continental Boulevard, west • of Peytonville Avenue, east of Davis Boulevard, and south of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. • City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 5 Applicant: Dowdey, Anderson, and Associates, Inc. Owner: Toll Brothers, Inc. SPIN Neighborhoods #14 and #15. J. ZA 97-088, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 8R, 8X (Common Area No. 2), 10R, 11R, 12R, and 13R, Block 2, and Lot 13R, Block 1, Stonebury, being a revision of Lots 8 through 13, Block 2, and Lot 13, Block 1, Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and a portion of Tract 2A2 situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500. Location: On Stonebury Drive approximately 700' west of the intersection of South Peytonville Avenue and Stonebury Drive. Current zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Dowdey, Anderson, and Associates, Inc. Owner: Toll Brothers, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #14. K. ZA 97-065, Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Old Carroll Road and East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner and Applicant: Westerra-Timarron, L.P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A. ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition-Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. This plat proposed twenty-six (26) residential lots and three common greens. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Old Carroll Road and East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner and Applicant: Westerra-Timarron, L. P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. B. Ordinance No. 480-Z, establishing regulations for gasoline service stations (with or without convenience stores, car washes, and other related ancillary uses). C. Ordinance No. 480-250, 1st reading (ZA 97-090), Rezoning of approximately 3.32 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. Location: 1496 East Dove Street approximately 120' west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove Avenue and East Dove Street. Current zoning is "AG" s City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 6 Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Area Surveying, Inc. Owner: Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins. SPIN Neighborhood #5. D. ZA 97-091, Preliminary Plat for the proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Higgins Addition, being legally described as approximately 3.32 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. Location: 1496 Dove Street approximately 120' west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove Avenue and East Dove Street. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a proposed zoning of"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Area Surveying, Inc. Owner: Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins. SPIN Neighborhood #5. E. Ordinance No. 681, 1st reading, street name change for a portion of Stonebury Drive from Lot 1 to Lot 8 and extending through Lot 9 of Block 2 in Stonebury Addition to Indian Paintbrush Way. F. Ordinance No. 682, 1st reading, designating a contiguous geographic area in Southlake as Reinvestment Zone Number One, City of Southlake, Texas. • 9. Resolution (no items this agenda). 10. Other items for consideration: A. Award of bid for the slurry grouting of pipe bedding and repair of concrete street pavement in Timarron, Phase I. B. Requested variances to the Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Burger King located at 2025 West Southlake Boulevard in Southlake Market Place, Phase II. C. Requested variance to the Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Wendy's located at 2130 East Southlake Boulevard in Village Center, Phase I. D. To reject all bids for reconstruction improvements of Dove Street from the west city limits to Shady Oaks Drive and direct staff to advertise for bids for the revised West Dove Street reconstruction improvements from the west city limits to Shady Oaks Drive. 11. Other items for discussion: 7 A. Charter Amendment Election. r City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 7 B. Pitched Roof Regulations C. Impervious Coverage 12. Adjournment. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, August 1, 1997 at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. ottitim►o% o s0UTit. 9f• 5 1 -♦ Sandra L. LeGrand % nt a CitySecretary Y � ��nn rrnmn�au`����� • If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider and/or discuss the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Vicci Winchester vs. Dan McKee Water Service Company, and the City of Southlake. 1995. 2. D/FW-White Chapel Ltd. vs. State of Texas and the City of Southlake, Texas. 1997. 3. City of Southlake vs. Kathy A. Brunson, William J. Justus, Trustee, William James Elder and James M. Elder, Inc., Employee Profit Sharing Trust. 1997. 4. Town of Westlake, Texas et al vs. City of Southlake, Texas. 1997. 5. Town of Westlake, Texas vs. City of Southlake, Carroll Huntress, et. al. 1997. 6. Legal action against Scott Bradley, Charla Bradshaw, Abe Bush, and Fred Held. 1997. 7. Marriam Baloch Claim. 1997. IIILAND ACQUISITION-SECTION 551.072 City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 5, 1997 page 8 The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisition in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session. PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074 The City Council may consider the appointment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Boards and Commission members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's office. DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open • session by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation arise or a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. 7/30/97 D:I WP-FILESIAGENDASI CC-8-5-9.WPD 0 r" i City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 7. 1997 o LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M. I 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission continuation meeting of July 10, 1997, and the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of July 17, 1997. 3. Administrative Comments. REGULAR AGENDA: 4. Consider: ZA 97-081, SITE PLAN ON THE PROPOSED LOT 2, COMMERCE SQUARE, on property legally described as being approximately 4.57 acres situated in the 4111 Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and a portion of Tract 3A. Location: South of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and immediately east of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "I-I" Light Industrial District uses. Owner and Applicant: Southlake Properties, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood#7. Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA 97-092, SITE PLAN FOR FOXBOROUGH OFFICE PARK,on property legally described as being Lot 1, Block 1, on the approved Final Plat of Foxborough, and being a portion of Tract 3E situated in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. Location: North side of East Southlake Boulevard(F. M. 1709) approximately 250' east of Diamond Boulevard. Current Zoning: "C-I" Neighborhood Commercial District. Owner and Applicant: Foxborough Office Building Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA 97-093, REZONING OF BROCK ADDITION, on property legally described as the south 20' of Lot 2, Brock Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: On Brock Drive, approximately 520' south of West Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: 'CS" Community Service District. Requested Zoning: "SF-IA" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: E. I. Wiesman. SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. j,► i City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 7, 1997 • PAGE 2 7. Consider: ZA 97-094,PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 1 R AND 3R, BROCK ADDITION,being approximately 10.147 acres, and being a revision of Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records. Tarrant County, Texas, and Lots 1, 2, and 3, of the Brock Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388- 44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and a 0.015 acre tract of land out of the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Southlake Church of Christ. Owners: Southlake Church of.Christ (Lot 1 R, Brock Addition) and E. I. Wiesman (Lot 3R, Brock Addition). SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA 97-095, REZONING on property legally described as approximately 0.93 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. Location: Approximately 300' east of the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "I-1" Light Industrial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. • Owner and Applicant: Ken Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA 97-096,PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 1R1 AND 1R2,W.W. HALL NO. 695 ADDITION, being a revision of Lot 1, W. W. Hall No. 695 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3581, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of North Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "0-1" Office District uses. Owner and Applicant: Greenway- Southlake Office Partners, L.P. SPIN Neighborhood#10. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA 97-097, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR WILMINGTON COURT, on property legally described as approximately 11.383 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and being Tracts 1A, IB, and 1C. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of South White Chapel Boulevard and West Continental Boulevard. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Four Peaks Development, Inc. Owners: Alvin R. Jackson(Tract 1A), Lannie Joe Roach(Tract 1B), and Trustees,E-Systems,Inc.,Pool Trust(Tract 1C). SPIN Neighborhood#14. Public Hearing. • • City of Southlake, Texas 41) REGULAR PLANNING& ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 7, 1997 PAGE 3 11. Consider: ZA 97-098, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILMINGTON COURT, being legally described as approximately 11.383 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and being Tracts IA, 1B, and 1C. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of South White Chapel Boulevard and West Continental Boulevard. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Applicant: Four Peaks Development, Inc. Owners: Alvin R. Jackson (Tract 1A), Lannie Joe Roach (Tract 1B), and Trustees, E-Systems, Inc., Pool Trust (Tract 1 C). SPIN Neighborhood #14. Public Hearing. 12. Consider: ZA 97-099, DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, on property legally described as being approximately 41.045 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No. 481,and being all of Tract 3B, a portion of Tract 3, and a portion of Tract 2A. Location: North of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), east of North Carroll Avenue, and south of State Highway 114. Current Zoning: "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District to include "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Applicant: Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. Owners: THE FECHTEL GROUP with general partners: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Joseph Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, James Milton Fechtel, Lorrie W. Beck, Leslie W. Klingman, and • Carol G. Peterka. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA 97-100, SITE PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE,on property legally described as being approximately 41.045 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, and being all of Tract 3B, a portion of Tract 3, and a portion of Tract 2A. Location: North of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). east of North Carroll Avenue.and south of State Highway 114. Current Zoning: "NR-PUD"Non- Residential Planned Unit Development District to include "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Applicant: Cooper& Stebbins, L.P. The Owners of the property are as follows:THE FECHTEL GROUP with general partners: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Joseph Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, James Milton Fechtel, Lorrie W. Beck, Leslie W. Klingman, and Carol G. Peterka. SPIN Neighborhood#4. Public Hearing. S e ` City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 7, 1997 0 PAGE 4 14. Consider: ZA 97-101. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE. on property legally described as being approximately 128.864 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, and being Tracts 2A, 3, 3A, and 3B. Location: North of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), east of North Carroll Avenue,, and south of State Highway 114. Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District and "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District to include "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Applicant: Cooper& Stebbins, L.P. Owners: THE FECHTEL GROUP with general partners: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Joseph Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, James Milton Fechtel, Lorrie W. Beck, Leslie W. Klingman, and Carol G. Peterka. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: MEETING ADJOURNMENT. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 0 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, August 1, 1997 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. OoUiminti# r�4 i4 ,j144/1,11, A I .(' °A% §andra L. LeGrand City Secretary v If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disa * res special needs,please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581,extension 704,and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. EXECUTIVE SESSION If a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. L:\WP-FILES\MTG\AGN\1997\08-07-97.WPD 1111 110 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 15, 1997 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern David Harris. Members: Scott Martin, Gary Fawks, Pamela Muller and Wayne Moffat. STAFF PRESENT: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager; Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Darcey Imm, Assistant to the City Manager; Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Ron Harper, City Engineer; Shawn Poe, Engineer; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Kim Lenior, Director of Parks and Recreation; Ben Henry, Park and Recreation Planning and Construction Superintendent; Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Coordinator; Shelli Siemer, Community Services Coordinator; E. Allen Taylor, Jr., City S Attorney; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. WORK SESSION: The work session was held to discuss agenda items by Council and staff. During the work session the Park and Recreation Board Report was given by Robin Jones who reported on the following items: On Thursday September 25, 1997 the Park and Recreation Board will be meeting with the SPIN Standing Committee; the Park and Recreation Board formed a task force to determine park credits; she noted the Park and Recreation Board in support of the "joint use" program; a discussion was held with regard to the relocation of the Fechtel Farm house, noting the Historical Society wants to keep the house as one of their projects, but a storage place for the building is yet to be determined. INVOCATION: Mayor Pro Tem W. Ralph Evans. The Regular City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Rick Stacy at 6:05 p.m. Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending • and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 1 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL to consider the appointments and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment on specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. Council adjourned into executive session at 6:06 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:20 p.m. Agenda Item #2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session Motion was made to authorize the City Attorney and the City Manager to explore the settlement negotiations with the Town of Westlake along the lines discussed in executive session. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #3, Approval of the Minutes of the July 1, 1997 City Council Meeting The minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on July 1, 1997 were approved as corrected S to show that Councilmember Moffat made the motion in agenda item #7-B, and not Councilmember Fawks as noted in the minutes. Motion: Fawks Second: Martin Ayes: Fawks, Martin, Evans, Harris, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #4-A, Mayor's Report Mayor Stacy made the following announcements during the Mayor's Report: • Final 40th Birthday Celebration for the City of Southlake will be held on September 27, 1997 at the site of Town Center. Call Tracy Southers, Public Information Officer, for more information or to volunteer to help with the activities. • MetroPort Cities Partnership meeting will be held on July 17, 1997 at 7:30 a.m. in the Keller Public Library. • Kaleidoscope of Homes will be held in Southlake this year in Cambridge Place Addition, with the tour of eight homes. It will begin the end of August and run through Septe mber. SThe public is invited to attend this event which is sponsored by the Builder's Association REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 2 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL in Fort Worth and Tarrant County. The proceeds go to the Muscular Dystrophy Association. • Budget work sessions will be held on August 12, 13 and 14 at Solana Education Center. More information will be coming. • SPIN will sponsor two public meetings to inform the citizens about the Reinvestment Zone #1 Southlake. The meetings will be held in the White Chapel Room at Bicentennial Park on July 28 at 6:30 p.m. and July 30, at 7:00 p.m. The public is invited to attend. • The Park and Recreation Board will meet with the SPIN Standing Committee on September 25, 1997. Keep that date in mind. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report No report made during this time. Agenda Item #4-C, SPIN Report • No report made during this time. Agenda Item #4-D, Park and Recreation Board Report Report made during the work session. Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda The consent agenda consisted of the following items: 5-A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an Amended Commercial Developer Agreement with Southridge Center, L. P. For Lot 6, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition. 5-B. Award of bid for the slurry grouting of the pipe bedding and repair of concrete street pavement in Timarron, Phase I. 5-C. Request to advertise for bids for an eight-foot self propelled asphalt paver. 9-A. Resolution No. 97-50, amending the fee schedule for park land dedication. 10-A. Award of bid for earthwork for proposed park improvements for Bob Jones Park, Phase SI. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 3 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion was made to approve item #5-A, #5-C, #9-A, and #10-A as a consent item. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #5-B, Award of bid for the slurry grouting of the pipe bedding and repair of concrete street pavement in Timarron, Phase I. Motion was made to table agenda item #5-B, time certain August 5, 1997. Motion: Martin Second: Evans Ayes: Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Harris, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote (to table) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CONSENT ITEMS 5-A. Amended Commercial Developer Agreement with Southridge Center, L.P. for Lot 6, • Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition. The amendment to the Developer Agreement amends Section III.A. Indemnification. 5-C. An eight-foot self-propelled asphalt paver was approved for purchase in the FY96-97 budget. $35,000 is available for the purchase of this equipment. Staff requests permission to advertise for bids for the equipment. 9-A. Resolution No. 97-50. At the July 1, 1997 City Council meeting, Ordinance No. 483-F was approved on second reading, revising Article VII, Parks and Recreation Dedication Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Ordinance list the amount of land to be dedicated by the developer for residential and commercial developments. As an alternative, the Ordinance provides for payment of a Park Dedication Fee to be paid in lieu of park land dedication. The land value used to calculate the Park Dedication Fee is included in the City's Schedule of Fees. The value of land per acre has increased from $25,000 to $40,000. 10-A. Award of bid for Bob Jones Park Improvements, Phase I, Earthwork Contract. Six bids were received for the project. The low bid was James Arnold Construction of Southlake. Mr. Arnold also did the grading of Bicentennial Park, Phase I, two years ago. The bid was $369,718, which is $85,119 under the estimated budget. The Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the award of bid on July 14, 1997 during their • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 4 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL meeting. Agenda Item #6, Public Forum Charlie Broadaway, 600 Bentwood Lane, Southlake. Mr. Broadaway stated he was speaking before Council because he is opposed to the TIF zone. He stated he speaks for himse if and a lot of residents that are also opposed to the TIF zone for many reasons including the complications, the deceitfulness, and obscureness to the general public and they cannot understand what it is. He stated they feels that everyone that comes to town should live by the same rules that the residents live by and be taxed that same way and the money should go to the commitments that the city has already made for it and it should not be dedicated to someone who has strings attached to it so that they can use it to their own advantage. Agenda Item #7-K and #7-L, ZA 97-023 and ZA 97-024 Councilmember David Harris stated that agenda items #7-K and #7-L have come to the City Council under less than optimal conditions. He requested that these items be tabled for approximately thirty days, until the August 19, 1997 City Council meeting to continue the public hearing. • Motion: Harris Second: Moffat Ayes: Harris, Moffat, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-J, ZA 97-068, Site Plan for Emergency Animal Hospital Motion was made to table ZA 97-068, Site Plan for an emergency animal hospital on the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Stonebridge Park, at the request of the applicant, William E. Hickey, time certain August 5, 1997, continuing the public hearing. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #8-C and #8-D, ZA 97-065 and ZA 97-066, Owner and Applicant: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. Motion was made to table agenda Item #8-C, ZA 97-065, Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, and Item #8-D, ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat for Timarron • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 5 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Addition-Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, at the request of the developer, time certain July 22, 1997. Motion: Martin Second: Evans Ayes: Martin, Evans, Harris, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #7-A, Ordinance No. 678, 2nd reading, Annexation of Solana Ordinance No. 678, 2nd reading, An ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, annexing the hereinafter more particularly described territory generally described as an area comprising approximately 480 acres abutting State Highway 114, known as "Solana", and an area comprising approximately 27 acres abutting that property to the City of Southlake, Texas, and extending the boundary limits of said City so as to include said territory within said city limits and granting to all owners of property all of the rights and privileges of other citizens and binding said owners and other persons within the annexed area by all the acts, ordinances, and regulations of said City. PUBLIC HEARING: • Kie Myzyka, 823 South Peytonville Avenue, Southlake. Mr. Myzyka asked the City Council to put the action on this item on hold until all the legal issues have been resolved. He stated he feels this is the wrong thing to do. Public Hearing Closed. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 678, 2nd reading. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance into the record. Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-B, Ordinance No. 480-247, 1st reading, ZA 97-074, Zoning the Solana Property Ordinance No. 480-247, 1st reading (ZA 97-074), Rezoning of property described as approximately 485 acres known as Solana and situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 6 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724; Tarrant County, Texas; the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County, Texas. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of"NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a mixed use business complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Owners: International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners-Westlake Partnership, and MTP-IBM Phases II & III Joint Venture. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that six (6) notices were sent to property owner s within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Ms. Gandy noted the applicant has complied with all the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended manufacturing SUP's but requests that#7, computer research, be a permitted use and be exempted from the SUP approval process. Bill Flarity, 107 Broadwick Court, Southlake, stated he works with leasing property for Solana. Mr. Flarity explained how Solana came together by showing a slide presentation of Solana and its success. He noted the first occupancy was in 1988 and stated the Marriott Solana is a two hundred room hotel with 8,000 feet of meeting space. Flarity stated they market Solana on a • national basis. Richard Kuhlman, Maguire Thomas Partners, 9 Village Circle. Mr. Kuhlman stated they built Solana with high goals in mind, working hard to put the package together. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-074, pursuant to the Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated Jul y 11, 1997, including the Developer Agreement as modified and explained by Ms. Gandy to clarify the deference between the SUP requirements for manufacturing only and not for computer research; accepting all other eliminations for uses as shown via strike-out in the proposed use sheets of the development regulations. Motion: Martin Second: Evans Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Harris, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Councilmember Wayne Moffat commented he found it quite a coincidence that two radio stations are at the meeting that have not attended before. They are WBAP and KRLD. Moffat said, "the minute that Council was called "neighbor kickers" the stations hear that and leave." Moffat stated he feels it is quite coincidental that IIIREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 7 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Westlake hired a public relations firm today, and radio stations came to the meeting. Council feels they are being good neighbors to our corporate citizens. Moffat stated he wanted to clarify that and let it be known that Council does see the correlation in being called "neighbor kickers" and actually "being good corporate neighbors." The second reading of this zoning will be on August 5, 1997. Agenda Item #7-C, Resolution No. 97-46 (ZA 97-075) SUP for Solana Marriott Hotel Resolution No. 97-46 (ZA 97-075), Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption at Solana Marriott Hotel, on the property described as Lot 2R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records, being approximately 6.286 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "NR-P-U-D" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with "0-2" Office District, "0-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Hospitality International, Inc. Owner: • Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. Spin Neighborhood undetermined. Public Hearing. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that four (4) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Ms. Gandy commented that the City has waived the requirement for a Concept Plan and/or Site Plan for existing development. Ms. Gandy stated a valid permit is currently in place at this location. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 97-46. Motion: Moffat Second: Harris Ayes: Moffat, Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item ##7-D, Resolution No. 97-47 (ZA 97-076) SUP for sale of alcoholic beverages at Chili's Restaurant at Solana. Resolution No. 97-47 (ZA 97-076) Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on- premises consumption at Chili's Restaurant at Solana, on the property described as Lot 1R, Block • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 8 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "NR-PUD" Non- Residential Planned Unit Development with "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District, and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Chili's Beverage Company. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners- Westlake/Southlake Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood undetermined. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that four notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Ms. Gandy stated the City waived the requirements for a Concept Plan and/or Site Plan for existing development and that a valid permit from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) has been in place since 1989. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were received during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 97-47 (ZA 97-076). Motion: Fawks Second: Evans • Ayes: Fawks, Evans, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Harris, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-E, Resolution No. 97-48 (ZA 97-077) SUP for alcoholic beverages for LaScala Restaurant at Solana. Resolution No. 97-48 (ZA 97-077), Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption at RAKIP (Jim) Lusha, d/b/a, La Scala Restaurant at Solana, on the property described as Lot 1R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District; and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: La Scala Ristorante Italiano, Inc. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood undetermined. The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, noted for the record that four (4) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. The City has waived the requirement for a Concept Plan and/or Site Plan for existing development. Ms. Gandy informed Council that a valid permit from the Texas Alcoholic • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 9 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Beverage Commission is in affect as they have been in business for eight (8) months. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were received during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 97-48 (ZA 97-077). Motion: Martin Second: Evans Ayes: Martin, Evans, Fawks, Harris, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-F, Resolution No. 97-51, Establishing an Economic Development Program with Solana. Resolution No. 97-51, Establishing an Economic Development Program with the Partnership that owns Solana, and authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement for the City to participate with Solana in the program. Curtis Hawk, City Manger, stated what the agreement would do is recognize the fact that a substantial portion (the area the City just annexed) lies in the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District (MUD) so Solana already pays a substantial tax to the Trophy Club • MUD. This agreement would provide that any new property that is developed within the MUD the City would get the difference in the tax rate, from what the MUD tax would be and what the City tax would be. The City would get all the tax from any new property developed which is located outside the MUD boundaries. The agreement also recognizes that we anticipate in the first years' revenues, the city would receive somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.5 million from the combination of different sales taxes the City will have imposed. It also recognizes the attempt by the City to stimulate business and commercial activity in the Solana area, thereby increasing the overall taxes the City receives, which can go to support the City services throughout the community. The City would then participate in the building of the extension of Kirkwood Boulevard from where it now ends over to Precinct Line Road and also the new Technology Driv e as set out in the exhibit in the Council packet. Councilmember Gary Fawks asked regarding the purpose of the MUD tax, if the City was going to collect property taxes and then pay the MUD tax? Mr. Hawk responded the City will collect all the taxes and then grant it back so that the property tax payer can pay the MUD tax. Councilmember Scott Martin asked for clarification that the duration of the agreement is for ten (10) years. Curtis Hawk commented, " if the MUD's were not there, this agreement would terminate as there would be no need for the agreement." • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 10 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Mayor Stacy commented that there would be a $3 million dollar cap on the extension of the roads expenditure. Mayor Stacy said, "the City is really committing in the agreement to spend the money to build those roads. There is no t a deadline on building the roads at this time. When the time comes, Solana will let us know." Stacy continued, " if we have already collected the revenue sufficient, we can go forward at that time building the roads, and if we have not collected the money when the time comes, either the City could issue Certificates of Obligations or some other short-term note or some arrangement the City could do with the developer fronting the money for the roads. Those two options are there, and it is the City's discretion which option we would take, according to Mr. Hawk." Councilmember Martin stated, " the City of Westlake has not provided any economic development to Solana that we are aware of in the past, in all their year s of existence." Mr. Hawk stated the officials of Westlake have said that on the record, and that 98% of Westlake's revenue comes from Solana. Martin stated, "this was really not a partnership-relationship as we have had with our portion of Solana for the past years, with Southlake giving to them, and they giving back to Southlake in some form." Mr. Hawk stated he believes that Solana is the largest III tax payer to the Carroll Independent School District and they don't put any students in the school. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 97-51, with minor changes to the Economic Development Program, specifically to the extent that the agreement itself refers to where the funding will come from on the City's part to pay for the capital improvements to Kirkwood and Technology Drives; allow the City to make provisions to pay for those developments that the City is committing to make, up to the sum of$3 million dollars, from sources available to the City; and further, amending the language found on Page 5, specifically, Section 5 (d), splitting into two parts that would modify the program grant on property already developed in the MUD, to read as stated in the agreement; and further modifying the paragraph to provide that future development in the MUD will result in the City returning only the amount of the payment due and owing to the MUD, with the City keeping the balance in the difference between the MUD tax and the property tax. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 11 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #7-G, Ordinance No. 480-246, 2nd reading (ZA 97-055) Ordinance No. 480-246, 2nd reading (ZA 97-055), Rezoning of approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "0-1" Office District. Owner/Applicant: Ken Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated six (6) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and the responses received include: Iva Lee Johnson, 720 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed; Bobby Struempler, 700 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed; Pamela Morrison, 710 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed. Ms. Gandy stated on July 1, 1997, the City Council approved this item (7-0), with the following amendments: 1) recognize that the applicant volunteered to increase the bufferyard from 10' to 20'; 2) place an 8' masonry fence on the west; and 3) build residential-style buildings with pitched roofs. Due to approximately 25% opposition of property owners within the 200' notification area, a super-majority vote (6 of 7) of the City Council will be required to approve this request. John Levitt, Levitt Engineer, 726 Commerce, Suite 104, Southlake, was present representing Ken • and Darla Smith, owners of the property. Mr. Levitt reviewed for Council the concessions made by Mr. Smith because of the desires of the property owners, including: 10' bufferyard changed to 20'; changing the set-back from 25' to 35'; changing a 6' wooden fence to a 6' masonry fence; in regard to screening, planting 2" caliber trees on 25' centers. Mr. Levitt presented a letter to the residents from Mr. Smith, dated July 15, 1997, which is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Councilmember Martin expressed that he was thankful that the developer has gone the extra miles for the property owners and that the developer wishes to be a good neighbor. PUBLIC HEARING: Bobby Struempler, 700 Whispering Woods Circle, Southlake. Mr. Struempler stated he is still opposed to the zoning change, stating the letter presented by Mr. Smith will not hold according to his attorney, adding, it is not an official document. Ken Schaffer, 10139 Brockbank, Dallas. Mr. Schaffer stated he recently purchased the property on Whispering Woods Circle and that he was given a copy of the letter tonight at 8:13 p.m. and does not have time to have it reviewed by his attorney. He stated he appreciates that Mr. Smith is trying to work with the property owners. He stated his attorney stated the letter is not of any use. He stated the terms in the letter are fine with him although he would like to see more set- . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 12 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL backs. He asked Council to delay the vote on this item until the issues could be worked out. Lowell Morrison, 710 Whispering Woods Circle, Southlake. Mr. Morrison stated he is sure Mr. Smith would keep his word, but the letter is not a legal document. He stated he feels if Mr. Smit h should sell the property they would have nothing. Mr. Morrison stated he measured all commercial buildings next to residential structures and that the average set-back is 70', therefore, they do not feel 50' is to much to ask of Mr. Smith. Councilmember Scott Martin commented on the location of the parking from each of the buildings, and asked at what location Mr. Morrison would like to see the parking between his property and the property in question. Mr. Martin stated he feels it will be better for the property owners to have the building closer and the parking further away as a protection to the neighbors. Iva Lee Johnson, 720 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake. Ms. Johnson asked if the property owners have a choice between the 35' set-back and no cars by her, she would rather have 35' set- back. Rex Potter, 303 Waterford Court, Southlake. Mr. Potter stated Council is encouraging the S citizens to consider deed restrictions, noting the citizens have stated what they are willing to accept. Potter said, " they have gone to the expense to try and understand, and the then would have to pay lawyers to enforce the deed restrictions." Public Hearing Closed. John Levitt stated the only change is the set-back from 25' to 35.' The Mayor stated he has heard the concerns. Levitt stated the property owners have gotten together and did not invite Mr. Smith to try and work this out. Mr. Levitt stated it would be likely that they would not be driving behind the structure if it were a 35' set-back. But that if the set-back were 50,' there might be parking or a driveway behind the structure. Ken Smith stated Mr. Morrison said he would pay ' of cost if Smith built a masonry fence. Now Mr. Smith is paying for all the fence and now the property owners want more set-back frontage. Councilmember Fawks stated he would like to see the two groups continue to work on the agreement. Pam Morrison, 710 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake. Ms. Morrison stated her lawyers say the document is not legal. • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 13 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Allen Taylor, City Attorney, stated the document itself has terms and conditions that are ligimately a portion of a valid deed restriction. Taylor said, "the problem all of the citizens are referring to is, in-an-of-itself, not a deed restriction instrument. It contains the "guts" of the agreement but a deed restriction itself is a dedicatory instrument that creates rights of adjoining parties and binds successors. There is language that needs to be incorporated in the document and that is not yet done. The document presented is like a business agreement that set s out the terms, but does not contain the dedicatory language that is necessary to make it enforceable." Council adjourned for recess at 9:12 p.m. Council returned to the council table at 9:20 p.m. The applicant, John Levitt, asked to have this item tabled until the August 5, 1997 meeting, continuing the public hearing. Motion was made to table Ordinance No. 480-246, 2nd reading, continuing the item time certain August 5, 1997 City Council meeting, continuing the public hearing. Motion: Fawks • Second: Muller Ayes: Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Harris, Evans, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #7-H, ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II, being legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.8685 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: 1709 Southlake Oaks, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that seven (7) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. She noted this item went before the City Council on June 17, 1997 and was tabled time certain July 15, 1997. The public hearing was officially closed. Neil Kookerbalm, 16800 Dallas Parkway, Dallas. Mr Kookerbalm explained the plat and why they deleted the "hat" from the tower on the front of the building, adding, he felt it looked off- balance so they removed it. Mr. Kookerbalm stated they pride themselves in building high quality • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 14 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL developments. Councilmember Harris expressed concerns with the new proposed driveway. Mr. Mark Wolfe, architect, stated he doesn't feel the pad site is marketable without the additional driveway. Councilmember Martin stated he feels Mr. Wolfe made two major blunders: 1) asking for another curb-cut; and, 2) safety near the City park. Mr. Kookerbalm requested this item be tabled until the August 19, 1997 City Council meeting. Motion was made to table ZA 97-058, time certain August 19, 1997 City Council meeting, forgiving the placement of the missing "hat" on the Phase I building; with $5,000 going to the traffic light fund; and continuing the public hearing. Motion: Fawks Second: Muller Ayes: Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Harris, Evans, Stacy Nays: None • Approved: 7-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #7-I, ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II, being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, and being approximately 3.058 acres of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. Applicant: Realty Captial Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that fourteen (14) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and three (3) written responses have been received, from: G.L.M. Nettleton, 2611 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, in favor; Roy Lee, 2620 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, in favor, "this is a quality building and should be an asset t o the neighborhood" and, Howard Carr, 311 South Kimball Avenue, Southlake, in favor, "provided the building installs a wooden fence along the west property line similar to the one already built on the (north)west property line." Ms. Gandy noted this item went before the City Council on June 17, 1997, being tabled until this meeting. The applicant has met all requirements in Site Pla n Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 11, 1997. • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 15 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Tom Wouters and Richard Myers, applicants, were present to answer questions for Council, noting they plan to take the fence to the end of the second phase. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-054, pursuant to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 11, 1997; accepting the horizonal and vertical articulation as shown in the documents; providing for the variances as noted: leave the east bufferyard as noted as two type "A"; and retaining the option of requiring it south of the Phase II development as currently shown on this plan; the same on the south and west bufferyard south of the limits of construction. Motion: Martin Second: Evans Curtis Hawk, City Manger, noted for the record that the 1.22 acres south of this property was purchased by the City for an elevated storage tank, however, due to DFW regulations, the City sold the property. Ayes: Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Harris, Stacy Nays: None • Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-M, ZA 97-069, Site Plan for Retail Eyecare and Professional Offices ZA 97-069, Site Plan for retail eyecare and professional offices for Dr. Wallace Ryne, on the proposed Lots 12R1 and 12R2, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, on property legally described as being Lot 12, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarr ant County, Texas. Applicant: FDB Architects. Owners: Diamond I Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that seven (7) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) written response has been received from To m Miller, 2 Diamond Limited, 5604 Oak Top, Colleyville, in favor. This item was acted upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 10, 1997, approved (7-0) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) waive requirement#3a (provide 5' Type A bufferyard along the east property line of Lot 12R1 and 12R2 and along the west property line of Lot 12R2, planting required plants elsewhere on site; 2) waive requirement #6a (minimum driveway spacing of 500' from right of ways intersecting F.M. 1709); 3) waive requirement #6b (minimum driveway throat depths for stacking); 4) requirement #10a (provide elevations of the proposed structure on Lot 12R1)-waive elevation requirement, stating that it is understood that no building permit will be issued without • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES DULY 15, 1997 PAGE 16 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL revised site plan approval by P&Z and City Council for Lot 12R1, to include building elevations; 5) requirement #l0c (provide horizontal and vertical articulation on all facades of each building)- forgive all articulations except for the west, which is required; 6) waive requirement#11 (40' rear building setback required along the north property line); 7) require dumpster to be angled, allowing an encroachment into the rear bufferyard, not to exceed 2-3 feet; 8) evaluate lighting and use minimal impact lighting where possible. Dr. Wallace Ryne, D.O. Dr. Wallace was present to answer questions for Council, noting he plans to build his practice for an eye care center. Fred Ballinger, owner, FDB Architects. Mr. Ballinger stated this has site specific issues and that the property cannot be developed without some variances. Councilmember Scott Martin asked for a commitment to professional services on the property and not retail. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were received during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-069, Site Plan for retail eyecare and professional offices, • subject to the Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 11, 1997; waiving the requirement of item 1 allowing the plantings required to be plated elsewhere on the site; item #2, require the dumpster to be angled, allowing an encroachment into the rear bufferyard, not to exceed 2-3 feet; item#4a, waive the requirement; item 6a, waive the requirement, stating that it is understood that no building permit will be issued without the approval of the P&Z and City Council for Lot 12R1, to include building elevations; item 6c, forgiving all missing articulation except for the west wall; item #7, waiving the requirement for the 40' rear building setback and allow as shown at 25'; noting that the sign approval shall be by separate instrument and permit and meet the requirements as set forth in the sign ordinance. Motion: Martin Second: Harris Ayes: Martin, Harris, Evans, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy Nays: Muller Approved: 6-1 vote Councilmember Harris added that he took the opportunity to visit with Dr. Ryan and he has indicated that if the City would care to initiate rezoning of this property and absorb the expense related to it, that he would be amenable to having the property rezoned to "0-1" Office District. Agenda Item #7-N, ZA 97-070, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 12R1 and 12R2, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 17 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ZA 97-070, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 12R1 and 12R2, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, being a revision of Lot 12, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.919 acres situated in the W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Applicant: FDB Architects. Owner: Diamond I Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that five (5) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) response was received from Tom Miller, 2 Diamond Limited, 5604 Oak Top, Colleyville, in favor. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this item on July 10, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) delete requirement #10 (minimum lot width of 125' at the rear lot line); and, 2) delete requirement#11 (minimum 30,000 s.f. lot area on both lots). Fred Ballinger, FDB Architects, representing the owner. Mr. Ballinger stated lot widths and sizes make this site difficult. He stated he had no problems with the Plat Review Summary No. 2. Mr. Ballinger noted that on item #6, they are providing that. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-070, pursuant to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated July 11, • 1997; deleting the requirement for the 125' minimum rear lot line in item #4 and in item #5, delete the requirement of the minimum lot size. Motion: Martin Second: Harris Ayes: Martin, Harris, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #8-A, Ordinance No. 480-241, 1st reading ZA 97-034) Ordinance No. 480-241, 1st reading (ZA 97-034), Rezoning of 320 West Highland, being approximately 6.311 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being Tract 8D. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Terry Robert Seaborn. SPIN Neighborhood #11. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that ten (10) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and five (5) written responses have been received from: Kay Myers, 570 Love Henry Court, Southlake, opposed, "SF-1B" zoning of six potential homes of 1,500 would not be in keeping with the immediate area"; Bert Yetman, P.O. Box 1116, Grapevine, undecided, "No knowledge of amount of homes to be built or class of home (s)"; Jerry Passmore, 340 Highland Street, Southlake, opposed, "a subdivision off of Highland would 1) not • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 18 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL been enhancement to any of us on the street 2) excessive traffic flow due to new schools and larger subdivision traffic 3) sewer is not available 4) road frontage is not adequate. If the request is only to be able to see the house and one acre then and only then would I agree to this request for rezoning."Robin Blackwood, 280 W. Highland Street, Southlake, opposed, "we are strongly opposed to more than two homes in this tract. Our opposition is based on the character of the entire W. Highland neighborhood, which is "rural" in nature and has lots generally well in excess of one acre. We would prefer one home only." Doreen Seebeck, 480 W. Highland, Southlake, opposed, "I would be opposed to multiple housing development. I would be in favor of one or two houses built to conform with the rest of the neighborhood. I would like to continue to have access to the Southlake Equestrian Trail head #3." Terry Seaborn, was present asking Council to give him what he asked for or nothing. PUBLIC COMMENT: Tim Railey, 440 West Highland, Southlake. Mr. Railey stated it would be inconsis tent to rezone the property. He stated he feels this property should be the same as the rest of the neighborhood. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-241, 1st reading. SMotion: Harris Second: Moffat Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Harris, Moffat, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #8-B, ZA 97-079, Preliminary Plat for Harrell Place Addition ZA 97-079, Preliminary Plat for Harrell Place, being legally described as approximately 5.8438 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 and being Tract 1C. Current zoning is "SF-1A" and `SF-30" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: DDFW Properties. SPIN Neighborhood #16. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that twenty-one (21) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and six (6) notices were received, including: Jerry Wayne, 425 N. Pearson Lane, Keller, opposed; John Wayne Oldham, 3165 Johnson Road, Southlake, in favor; Tod Radford, 3185 Johnson Road, Southlake, undecided; Thomas Van Fleet, 407 North Pearson Road, Keller, opposed; Bertram Poulin 345 North Pearson Lane, Keller, opposed; and, Donald McMoy, 3200 Gray Lane, Southlake, in favor. • SRon Harper, City Engineer, explained to Council and the audience the steps that REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 19 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL would need to be taken to correct the drainage problems near this addition and the drainage easement in Cimmarron Acres Addition. Wayne Lee, Developer, stated he feels the biggest drainage problem is on Lot 2, Block 1 of Cimmarron Acres Addition. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bobby Butler, 3210 Gray Lane, Southlake. Mr. Butler presented five (5) photographs of his property after recent rains, showing the amount of water that stands on his property. Mr. Butler stated he was aware of the drainage easement and that a problem existed when he purchased his property. He stated he does not feel the easement can be cleaned out enough to make any difference. He asked Council, "Why do I have to be the dumping problem?" If the City put in a drainage pipe it would give him back the use of his land. He wants to see if it is fixed before any dirt is turned on the new development. Mayor Rick Stacy stated the drainage problem will need to be addressed during the developer agreement for Harrell Place Addition. Director of Public Works, Bob Whitehead, stated he does not care to comment • until he sees the drainage plans. Ron Harper stated, the City will need a construction easement, as the City may need to move equipment in/out to repair the problem. L.D. Tucker, 3300 Gray Lane. Mr. Tucker stated he is on the corner and has more land under water than anyone. He stated he feels if the City will add more pipe, it will put more water on him. He stated he feels if the City would clean out the vegetation on Pearson Lane, it would help. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-077, subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated July 11, 1997. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Councilmember Fawks stated this item will come back to Council with a Developer Agreement in the near future. • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 20 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #8-E, Ordinance No. 480-248, 1st reading (ZA 97-080) Ordinance No. 480-248, 1st reading (ZA 97-080), Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.2983 acres. Current zoning is "SF-1" Single Family Residential District, with a requested zoning of "RE" Residential Estate District. Owners and Applicants: Brandon and Charlotte Baker. SPIN Neighborhood #14. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that four (4) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have been received. Brandon Baker, owner/applicant, was present to answer questions for Council. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-248, 1st reading. Motion: Fawks Second: Evans Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Fawks, Evans, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Harris, Stacy Nays: None • Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #8-F, ZA 97-071, Plat Revision for Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates ZA 97-071, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates, being a revision of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tar rant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Current zoning is "RE" Residential Estates District, and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Brandon and Charlotte Baker. SPIN Neighborhood #14. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented the Plat Revision was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 10, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) reword requirement #11c (ad "Utility Easement" to the existing drainage easements) to require an additional "water and sanitary sewer" easement on north-south portion of existing drainage easement. Brandon Baker, owner, stated he agrees to put an easement on the north-south portion of the existing drainage easement, but he is not happy about it. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-071, Plat Revision for Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker • REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 21 OF 23 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Estates, pursuant to the Revised Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997, noting the change item 11c, removing "water" and adding "sewer" to the easement. Motion: Martin Second: Harris Ayes: Martin, Harris, Evans, Fawks, Muller, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #11-A, Discussion: City-Initiated Rezonings Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated staff is seeking direction from the City Council on the one remaining city-initiated rezoning case, ZA 97-040, stating, this case reflected two (2) properties located at the Northeast corner of North Peytonville Avenue and F.M. 1709. Tract 2-1 is owned by the Grace Presbyterian Church and Tract 2-2 is owned by Southridge Center, L.P. According to a memorandum dated July 11,1997, from Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, ther e were originally five (5) cases with multiple properties being considered for rezoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed all five cases on May 8, 1997, and recommended that all cases (with the exception of ZA 97-040), be denied. This case was on the Council agenda on May 20, 1997, and action was deferred until after the Council's June, 1997 Retreat. Although • the subject of city-initiated rezoning was discussed at the retreat, no date was set for future deliberation of case ZA 97-040. Councilmember Gary Fawks stated he feels the zoning approved by the P&Z needs to move forward, and he added, from the recent Dalton letter, they are actively marketing his property. Councilmember Pamela Muller commented on the meetings held by her, Councilmember Fawks and Karen Gandy with regard to city-initiated rezonings. Ms. Muller stated the committee brought forth a list of different zoning categories throughout the city that have been raised over the past ten years that poss ibly need to be looked at. They discussed what the top five might be because there might be a situation where someone is requesting a site plan and it would be too late to change the zoning. Muller stated she is confused with what happened at the planning and zoning level. This was not meant to upset property owners or anyone. Councilmember David Harris stated he felt the recommendations from staff and the Council committee should have gone back to the City Council for further direction. IIIREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 22 OF 23 • • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated he feels staff should relook at the issues and bring back something for the City Council to look at. Councilmember Scott Martin stated study groups come back to the City Council to let the City Council vote and give clear direction to the Planning and Zoning Commission on what the Council wants. Agenda Item #12, Adjournment Upon closing, it was noted the ground breaking of Bob Jones Park will be held the first or second week in August. The water tower at F.M. 1709 and Pearson Lane will be complete and a dedication ceremony will taken place the first part of August, according to Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works. Mayor Stacy adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m. III Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary D:\WP-FILES\MINUTES\CC-7-15-.MIN SREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 23 OF 23 A i. • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 22, 1997 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem, W. Ralph Evans; Deputy Mayor Pro Tem. David Harris. Members: Pamela Muller, Wayne Moffat, and Scott Martin. COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Rick Stacy and Councilmember Gary Fawks. STAFF PRESENT: Curtis Hawk, City Manager; Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Darcey Imm, Assistant to the City Manager; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager; Shelli Siemer, Community Services Coordinator; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Ron Harper, City Engineer; Shawn Poe, Engineer; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. IIIINVOCATION: Deputy Mayor Pro Tern David Harris. WORK SESSION: The work session was held to discuss agenda items by Council and staff. The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans. Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and to consider the appointment and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. Council adjourned into executive session at 6:02 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:00 p.m. III REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 1 OF 6 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session As the result of the executive session, a motion was made to authorize staff to proceed with the property exchange as discussed in executive session. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Muller, Moffat, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Also, as the result of the executive session, a motion was made to authorize the Mayor to proceed with presenting our proposed compromise and settlement agreement to the officials in the Town of Westlake. Motion: Harris Second: Muller Ayes: Harris, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote • Agenda Item #4-A, Mayor's Report Mayor Pro Tem Evans had no items for the Mayor's report. He reported the Mayor is in the ai r somewhere between DFW airport and Oakland, California. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report Curtis Hawk, City Manager, reported that the ground storage tank at Pearson Lane and F.M. 1709 is nearly complete. He commented that originally it had been planned to have a dedication ceremony on August 4, 1997. That date has been changed to about the 25th of August. The schedule is still to start filling the tank on July 24, 1997. Samples will be taken on August 4, 1997 and the City will test the pumps after that. The fence should be installed on August 18, 1997 an d the City can start using the system after that. Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda The consent agenda consisted of the following items: 5-A. Resolution No. 97-52, Adopting the City of El Fuerte, Sinaloa, Mexico, as a Sister City. 5-B. Request approval for Councilmember Scott Martin to travel to Mexico for Southlake Sister • Cities. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 2 OF 6 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 5-C. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Appraisal Services, Inc. to appraise eight properties for S.H. 114 takings for the West Dove Street interchange. 5-D. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. for Southlake Corridor Administration, Design, and Landscape Architectural Services, Phase I. 5-E. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Glass and Associates for development of a Comprehensive Strategic Plan. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda including items #5-A, #5-B, #5-C, #5-D and#5- E, as presented. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Muller, Moffat, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote IIIADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CONSENT ITEMS 5-A. Resolution No. 97-52, A resolution in support of adopting the City of El Fuerte, Sinaloa, Mexico, as a Sister City. Southlake Sister City Program is a nonprofit organization, formed to facilitate cultural exchanges and goodwill between countries and in doing so further contribute to world peace and prosperity. 5-B. Request for approval for Councilmember Scott Martin to travel to Mexico for Southlake Sister City program. A delegation of Southlake area residents and business leaders representing Southlake Sister Cities will be visiting the City of El Fuerte, Sinaloa, Mexico, leaving DFW on August 6 returning August 11, 1997. According to the Council Travel Policy, Section C(3), Other events and travel expenses, reimbursement for expenses of travel of City Councilmembers for purpose other than those listed in the policy must be approved in advance by a vote of a majority of the City Council. It is estimated the expenses will not exceed $850. This amount will include airfare, train fare, and hotel for five nights. 5-C. Professional Services Agreement with Appraisal Services, Inc. to appraise eight properties for SH 114 takings for the West Dove Street interchange. The maximum cost for the appraisals is $16,150. As part of the agreement made with the Texas Department of Transportation, it is the City of Southlake's responsibility to appraise and acquire property 1110 for additional right-of-way for the widening of SH 114. The properties that are proposed REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 3 OF 6 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL to be appraised are located adjacent to the proposed SH 114-Dove Street interchange. 5-D. The Corridor Study Phase I Concept Development was included in last year's budget in the amount of$10,000. The project that will best accomplish the pilot project is the area within F.M. 1709 right-of-way in front of Myers Meadow Subdivision. The letter of agreement to Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. (Landscape Architects) was prepared by Greg Last and Chris Carpenter of the Community Development Department. 5-E. Professional Services Agreement with Glass and Associates for development of a comprehensive strategic plan was approved. Funds have been included in this year's budget to hire a consultant to design a strategic planning process, facilitate planning sessions, analyze information gathered during planning sessions, and prepare a final report. Cost of the project will be $12,000. Glass and Associates recently completed the city's second citizen satisfaction survey and second business survey for the Office of Economic Development. Agenda Item #7-A, ZA 97-065, Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Wvndsor Creek, Phase II. S ZA 97-065, Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. Current zoning is "R-P- U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner and Applicant: Westerra-Timarron, L. P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated nineteen (19) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and three (3) written responses have been received from, Gerald Montague, 1125 Longford Drive, Southlake, in favor; Bill Jennings, 1199 E. Continental Boulevard, Southlake, undecided; and Pat and James Green, 731 Wyndsor Creek Drive, Southlake, in favor. Ms. Gandy noted the Planning and Zoning Commission approved this item (4-2-1 vote) on July 3, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) delete requirement #6 (Street "A" must be aligned with either East Perry Circle or West Perry Circle center lines); 2) adopt revisions presented; 3) examine the need for 60' right-of-way. Todd Jensen, Carter & Burgess, 7950 Elmwood Drive, Dallas. Mr. Jensen asked for variances on item#3-B, cul-de-sac length. He asked that item#3A be waived. He noted the developers wil 1 be taking some of the lots in the flood plane out of the flood plane and they are preparing the documentation for this. Councilmember Scott Martin noted three or four separate parcels on the south side • for continuation of the trail for the safety of the children. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 4 OF 6 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Wayne Moffat asked why would the City Council waive the number of homes on a cul-de-sac. At this time the focus is on density and not safety. There are five lots over quantity, this is not a density issue. Councilmember Pamela Muller asked why the limit of twenty (20) lots on a cul-de- sac. Councilmember Scott Martin asked for a crash gate on Lot 44. PUBLIC COMMENTS: No comments were received. Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session continued Mayor Pro Tem W. Ralph Evans advised the audience that Council would be returning into executive session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:35 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:45 p.m. Agenda Item #2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session IIINo action was taken as the result of the executive session. Councilmember requested that Street "C" be taken out of the plan. Todd Jensen asked that ZA 97-065 be tabled until the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting. Motion was made to table ZA 97-065, and ZA 97-066, at the request of the applicant, time certain August 5, 1997. Motion: Harris Second: Muller Ayes: Harris, Muller, Moffat, Martin, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #8-A, ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition-Wyndsor Creek, Phase II ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition-Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. Current zoning is "R-P- • U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner and Applicant: Westerra-Timarron, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 5 OF 6 r • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL L.P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. This item was tabled at the request of the applicant, time certain August 5, 1997. (Tabled under agenda item #7-A action). Agenda Item #12, Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans at 8:00 p.m. W. Ralph Evans, Mayor Pro Tern ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand • City Secretary D:\WP-FILES\MINUTES\CC-7-22-.MIN 111 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 6 OF 6 a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION S REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING July 3, 1997 1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice-Chairman James Murphy; Commissioners 2 Ann Creighton, Debra Edmondson, Rob Jones, F. C. LeVrier, and Lanny Tate 3 4 COMMISSION ABSENT: None 5 6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Wayne Olson, Community Development Director Greg 7 Last,Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, City Engineer Ron Harper, Staff Engineer Angela Turner, 8 Planner Chris Carpenter, Planner Dennis Killough, and Community Development Secretary Lori 9 Farwell 10 11 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 6:12 p.m. to announce that the Commission 12 would be going into Executive Session. 13 14 The meeting was called back to order by Chairman Wright at 6:54 p.m., and he asked City Attorney 15 Wayne Olson if any action was necessary as a result of the Executive Session. Mr. Olson stated that 16 there was no action necessary. Chairman Wright then stated that the Commission would go into 17 Work Session. 9 The meeting was called back to order by Chairman Wright at 7:17 p.m. 21 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 22 Chairman Wright opened discussion of the minutes of the June 19, 1997, Regular Planning and 23 Zoning Commission meeting. 24 25 Motion was made to approve the June 19, 1997,Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes 26 as amended in the Work Session. 27 28 Motion: Edmondson 29 Second: Murphy 30 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 31 Nays: None 32 Approved: 7-0 33 Motion carried. 34 35 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section #56) 36 37 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 38 Community Development Director Greg Last informed the Commission of a possible Work Session 3 regarding the first phase of the Southlake Town Center project. He stated that this Work Session is Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 1 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 0 tentatively scheduled for July 31, 1997. Mr. Last also reminded the Commission of a Joint Planning and Zoning Commission and SPIN Work Session on July 24, 1997. 3 4 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#87) 5 6 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 97-074, REZONING: 7 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that this request is for a Zoning 8 Change on property described as approximately 485 acres, known as Solana and situated in the U.P. 9 Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, 10 Abstract No. 1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 11 No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, 12 the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 13 724, Tarrant County,Texas,the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County,Texas. The property 14 is located South and West of State Highway No. 114, East of Precinct Line Road , and North of the 15 Town of Westlake. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested zoning is"NR- 16 PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as 17 Solana,to include the following uses: "0-2"Office District,"C-3"General Commercial District,`B- 18 1" Business Service Park District, "CS"Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. The 19 owner and applicant is International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas 20 Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners-Westlake Partnership, and MTP-IBM 21 Phases II & III Joint Venture. The Land Use Category and the Corridor Recommendation have not 0 been determined for this property. Six (6) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 24 25 Bill Flagherty (Maguire Partners) 101 Braddock Court, Southlake, Texas, and Richard Kuhlman 26 (Maguire Partners) 9 Village Circle, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. 27 28 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Kuhlman if he would be willing to restrict the following uses 29 in the "B-1" zoning district by Specific Use Permit (S.U.P.) only: 7). Computer manufacture and 30 research; 9). Electronic manufacture; 11). Lithograph, engraving, printing and publishing; 12). 31 Manufacture of medical and dental equipment; 13). Manufacture of musical instruments; 16). 32 Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing; 21). Scientific and professional instrument 33 manufacturing; and 23). Small parts manufacturing and assembly. Mr. Kuhlman agreed to restrict 34 those uses by S.U.P. only. 35 36 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 37 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 38 39 Motion was made to approve ZA97-074 subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1, 40 dated June 27, 1997, restricting the following permitted uses in the "B-I" Business Service Park 41 District by Specific Use Permit only: 7). Computer manufacture and research; 9). Electronic 42 manufacture; 11). Lithograph, engraving,printing and publishing; 12). Manufacture of medical and 4 dental equipment; 13). Manufacture of musical instruments; 16). Optical instrument and lenses Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 2 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION 0 manufacturing; 21). Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing; and 23). Small parts manufacturing and assembly. 3 4 Motion: Murphy 5 Second: Creighton 6 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 7 Nays: None 8 Approved: 7-0 9 Motion carried. 10 11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#734) 12 13 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA 97-075, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC 14 BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT SOLANA MARRIOTT HOTEL: 15 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that this request is for a Specific Use 16 Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption at Solana Marriott Hotel on 17 the property described as Lot 2R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, 18 Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, 19 in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records, being approximately 6.286 acres. The property is 20 located at 5 Village Circle. The current zoning is "AG"Agricultural District. The requested zoning 21 is"NR-PUD"Non-residential Planned Unit Development with"0-2"Office District,"C-3"General 0 Commercial District, "B-1"Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC"Hotel District. The owner is Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. The 24 applicant is Hospitality International, Inc. The Land Use Category and the Corridor 25 Recommendation have not been determined for this property. Four (4) written notices were sent to 26 property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 27 28 Richard Kuhlman (Maguire Partners) 9 Village Circle, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the 29 Commission. Mr. Kuhlman stated that this facility has been operating since mid-1990. 30 31 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 32 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 33 34 Motion was made to approve ZA97-075. 35 36 Motion: Tate 37 Second: Murphy 38 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 39 Nays: None 40 Approved: 7-0 41 Motion carried. 42 to (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#831) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 3 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 0 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA 97-064, SITE PLAN OF SOUTHRIDGE CENTER, LOT 4, BLOCK 6, SOUTHRIDGE LAKES: 3 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA97-064 and to continue the Public Hearing 4 to the August 21, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 5 6 Motion: Murphy 7 Second: Creighton 8 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 9 Nays: None 10 Approved: 7-0 11 Motion carried. 12 13 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#852) 14 15 AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA 97-076, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC 16 BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT CHILI'S RESTAURANT AT SOLANA: 17 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that this request is for a Specific Use 18 Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption at Chili's Restaurant at 19 Solana on the property described as Lot 1R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, 20 Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, 21 in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. The property is located at 3 Village Circle, Suite 108. S The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested zoning is "NR-PUD" Non- Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2"Office District,"C-3"General 24 Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and 25 "HC" Hotel District. The owner is Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. The 26 applicant is Chili's Beverage Company. The Land Use Category and the Corridor Recommendation 27 have not been determined for this property. Four(4) written notices were sent to property owners 28 within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 29 30 Richard Kuhlman (Maguire Partners) 9 Village Circle, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the 31 Commission. Mr. Kuhlman stated that this facility has been operating since 1989. 32 33 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 34 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 35 36 Motion was made to approve ZA97-076. 37 38 Motion: Jones 39 Second: Tate 40 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 41 Nays: None 42 Approved: 7-0 toMotion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 4 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION • (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#927) 3 AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA 97-077, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC 4 BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT RAKIP (JIM) LUSHA D/B/A LA 5 SCALA RESTAURANT: 6 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy informed the Commission that this request is for a Specific Use 7 Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption at Rakip (Jim) Lusha d/b/a 8 La Scala Restaurant on the property described as Lot 1 R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1 R and 2R, 9 Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 10 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. The property is located at 3 Village Circle, 11 Suite 115. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested zoning is "NR-PUD" 12 Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" 13 General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service 14 District and "HC" Hotel District. The owner is Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake 15 Partnership. The applicant is La Scala Ristorante Italiano, Inc. The Land Use Category and the 16 Corridor Recommendation have not been determined for this property. Four(4)written notices were 17 sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 18 19 Richard Kuhlman (Maguire Partners) 9 Village Circle, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the 20 Commission. 21 0 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 24 25 Motion was made to approve ZA97-077. 26 27 Motion: Edmondson 28 Second: Murphy 29 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 30 Nays: None 31 Approved: 7-0 32 Motion carried. 33 34 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#989) 35 36 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided over Agenda Items #9 and 37 #10. 38 39 AGENDA ITEM #9, ZA 97-065. DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF TIMARRON ADDITION - 40 WYNDSOR CREEK, PHASE II: 41 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Development Plan of 42 Timarron Addition- Wyndsor Creek, Phase II on property legally described as being approximately 6 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B 1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F 1. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 5 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION S Old Carroll Road and East Continental Boulevard. The current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential and 3 100 Year Flood Plain. The owner and applicant is Westerra- Timarron, L.P. Nineteen (19) written 4 notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and two (2) responses were 5 received with one (1) being in favor and one (1) being undecided. 6 7 Steve Yetts(Westerra- Timarron, L.P.) 300 E. Carpenter Freeway, Irving, Texas, presented this item 8 to the Commission. He asked for exception to Staff Comment#6 which addresses the alignment of 9 East Perry Circle and West Perry Circle with "Street A"; he asked to leave the location of"Street A" 10 as it is shown. Mr. Yetts stated that several residents have expressed their concerns to him regarding 11 the safety of the connection of"Street A" and Longford Drive. He presented a plan to reconfigure 12 "Street A" and stated that this new plan had not been reviewed by City staff 13 14 Commissioner Edmondson stated that she is very concerned about this development's proximity to 15 Metro Pool which stores chlorine gas on-site. Mr. Yetts stated that Westerra- Timarron, L.P., does 16 not own Metro Pool, so he does not know what he can do to remedy the situation. 17 18 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. 19 20 Brian Bazar, 1127 Longford Circle, Southlake, Texas, stated that he owns the house at the 21 intersection of Longford Drive and "Street A." He stated that he is very concerned about the safety 0 of his children if the location of"Street A" is approved as shown on the first plan. He asked the Commission to approve the second scenario in which"Street A" does not connect to Longford Drive. 24 He said that Westerra- Timarron, L.P. has worked very hard with him to remedy the situation. 25 26 Tim Kirst, 808 Longford Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that he is very pleased with the change in 27 the configuration of"Street A" and asked the Commission to approve this application. 28 29 Bret Boren stated his confusion with the amount of right-of-way (R.O.W.) needed for Old Carroll 30 Road. He stated that there appears to be some discrepancy between his property and the Timarron- 31 Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, property. He stated that he is more than happy to give what property is 32 needed if the City intends to improve the road, but he does not want to dedicate property and just 33 have it sit there with no improvements. 34 35 Planner Dennis Killough stated that Old Carroll Road was shown as 70' R.O.W. on the previous 36 Master Thoroughfare Plan (M.T.P.). He stated that section of Carroll Avenue is no longer 37 designated on the M.T.P. since it has been updated. Mr. Killough stated that due to the nature of Old 38 Carroll Road, the City would require 60' R.O.W. 39 40 City Attorney Wayne Olson stated that when the next item comes up, the Preliminary Plat for this 41 property, the City needs to require dedication of whatever amount of R.O.W. needed for Old Carroll 42 Road. Mr. Olson stated that Mr. Boren's property and any dedication required of it is another issue tofor another day. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 6 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION 0 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he is uncomfortable voting on this application until he has more information regarding the amount of R.O.W. dedication. 3 4 Commissioner Tate stated that although he is not against the new configuration of"Street A," he 5 does not know how the Commission would put it into a motion this evening. 6 7 Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing. 8 9 Mr. Olson stated that he does not think the Commission needs to speculate in this meeting how much 10 R.O.W. is needed; he suggested to dedicate R.O.W. as determined by the City Engineer. 11 12 Motion was made to approve ZA97-065 subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1, 13 dated June 27, 1997, deleting Item#6 (alignment of"Street A" to East Perry Circle and West Perry 14 Circle), approving "Street A" configuration as presented tonight, and requesting that City staff study 15 the amount of R.O.W. needed for Old Carroll Road. 16 17 Motion: Tate 18 Second: Jones 19 Ayes: Tate, Jones, Murphy, Creighton 20 Nays: LeVrier, Edmondson 21 Abstain: Wright eApproved: 4-2-1 Motion carried. 25 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#2423) 26 27 Vice-Chairman Murphy called for a recess at 8:35 p.m. 28 Vice-Chairman Murphy called the meeting back to order at 8:50 p.m. 29 30 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA 97-066, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TIMARRON ADDITION - 31 WYNDSOR CREEK, PHASE II: 32 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for 33 Timarron Addition-Wyndsor Creek,Phase II,on property legally described as being approximately 34 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 35 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. This plat proposes twenty-six (26) residential lots and three (3) 36 common greens. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Old Carroll 37 Road and East Continental Boulevard. The current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit 38 Development District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential and 100 Year Flood 39 Plain. The owners and applicants are Westerra - Timarron, L.P. Nineteen (19) written notices 40 were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and two(2)responses were received 41 with one (1) being in favor and one (1) being opposed. 42 S Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 7 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION S Steve Yetts(Westerra- Timarron, L.P.) 300 E. Carpenter Freeway, Irving Texas, presented this item to the Commission. Mr. Yetts asked that the Commission delete Item #1 la which addresses the 3 alignment of East Perry Circle and West Perry Circle with "Street A". 4 5 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to 6 speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing. 7 8 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he would like to make a comment to City Council to ensure an 9 equitable division of R.O.W. along Old Carroll Road. 10 11 Commissioner Creighton stated that she would like to see Mr. Boren's R.O.W. concerns addressed 12 and not overlooked. 13 14 Commissioner LeVrier stated that he would like the dedication of R.O.W. to be from the center line 15 of the road and to be equal on both sides all the way down Old Carroll Road; he stated that would 16 be fair to everyone. 17 18 Motion was made to approve ZA97-066 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 19 1997, deleting Item #1la (alignment of "Street A" to East Perry Circle and West Perry Circle), 20 approving"Street A"configuration as presented tonight,and stating to City Council that there should 21 be an equitable distribution of R.O.W. on Old Carroll Road. 0 Motion: Tate Second: Jones 25 Ayes: Jones, Tate, LeVrier, Murphy, Creighton 26 Nays: Edmondson 27 Abstain: Wright 28 Approved: 5-1-1 29 Motion carried. 30 31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#2878) 32 33 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting. 34 35 AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA 97-068, SITE PLAN FOR AN EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL: 36 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan for 37 approximately 0.65 acres situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and a portion of 38 Tract 2D. The property is located on the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) 39 approximately 550' west of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Randol 40 Mill Drive. The current zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with"C-2" Local Retail 41 Commercial District uses. The Land Use Category is 100 Year Flood Plain. The Corridor 42 Recommendation is Retail Commercial. The owner is N.T.V.M.G.(North Texas Veterinary Medical 46' Group). The applicant is William E. Hickey. Seven(7)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses were received. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 8 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION S Commissioner Edmondson asked if this property is shown to be completely within the flood plain, and Mr. Carpenter stated that this appeared to be true, based on the designation on the Land Use 3 Plan. 4 5 Larry Hutto, 300 Trophy Club Drive, Suite 400, Trophy Club, Texas, presented this item to the 6 Commission. He asked for exception of Item #9 and asked that the Commission accept the 7 articulation as presented. After discussion, Mr. Hutto agreed to meet all articulation requirements 8 prior to presenting this item at City Council. 9 10 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 11 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 12 13 Motion was made to approve ZA97-068, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 14 27, 1997, recognizing that the applicant agreed to meet all articulation requirements prior to 15 presenting this item to City Council. 16 17 Motion: Murphy 18 Second: Creighton 19 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 20 Nays: None 21 Approved: 7-0 0 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#3465) 25 26 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA 97-079, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HARRELL PLACE: 27 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for 28 Harrell Place, being legally described as approximately 5.8438 acres situated in the J. G. Allen 29 Survey, Abstract No. 18 and being Tract 1C. This plat proposes six (6) residential lots. The 30 property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Johnson Road and Harrell Drive. 31 The current zoning is "SF-1A" and "SF-30" Single Family Residential District. The Land Use 32 Category is Low Density Residential. The owner and applicant is DDFW Properties. Twenty- 33 one (21) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and five (5) 34 responses have been received,one(1)of which was in favor,three(3)were opposed and one(1)was 35 undecided. 36 37 Ed Childress (LandCon, Inc.) 2501 Parkview Drive, Suite 610, Fort Worth, Texas, presented this 38 item to the Commission. He stated that he is currently working on Item#3 (providing an off-site 39 drainage easement); he is working with the Parks Department and Keller I.S.D. regarding a possible 40 joint effort in resolving the drainage issues. 41 42 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 9 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 0 Bobby Butler, 3210 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated his concern about the extreme drainage problems in this area. He asked the Commission to deny this plan until a solution to the drainage 3 problems is found. 4 5 L.D. Tucker, 3300 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated that his property is probably the most 6 affected property in the area. He said that the City is not maintaining the drainage easement along 7 the north side of his property. He asked that the Commission deny this application until something 8 is done to resolve the drainage problems. 9 10 George Goebel, 3110 Gray Lane, Southlake, Texas, asked that the City address the drainage 11 problems in this area. 12 13 Bert Poulin, 345 N. Pearson Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated his concern about the drainage on the 14 back of his property. He would like to see a drainage plan before this application is approved. 15 16 Wayne Lee, 3220 W. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, stated that there are about eighteen(18) 17 acres in this drainage basin and his property only covers about six (6) acres; he said that most of it 18 is Keller I.S.D. He said the City of Southlake is possibly going to purchase the school's property, 19 and he has been working with them to see if they would incorporate some detention ponds into the 20 school's property. He stated that the drainage easement that is currently behind some home on Gray 21 Lane is already there and should be maintained by the City of Southlake. • Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 24 25 Staff Engineer Angela Turner stated that Public Works Department is currently researching the 26 problems with the drainage easement behind the homes on Gray Lane. When the City receives 27 detailed construction plans, she stated that City staff will work with the engineers on this project to 28 make sure the culverts are properly sized, etc. 29 30 City Manager Curtis Hawk stated that what were at one time 35' drainage easements do not appear 31 to be 35' drainage easements now. He said that if those easements have been filled in over time,then 32 they do need to be cleaned out in order to handle the water as intended. He said that there may be 33 some problems that need to be addressed with individual property owners, but there is no way to 34 know at this time. 35 36 Commissioner Edmondson asked Ms. Turner if she has walked this area and looked at the drainage 37 easement. Ms. Turner stated that she did go out and walk the area with Mr. Poulin. 38 39 Commissioner LeVrier stated that he wants to see this development become a part of the overall 40 drainage solution and that it is identified before this case proceeds any further. 41 42 Commissioners Edmondson and Creighton agreed with Commissioner LeVrier that they do not want 41) to sign off on the plat before the drainage solutions are found. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 10 of 22 • • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION • Mr. Lee stated that if the Commission stops him at the preliminary plat stage, then he cannot move forward at all. He stated that he is currently working with the City and with the Parks Department 3 to get the drainage problems resolved. 4 5 Commissioner Jones stated that with this development, the City has the opportunity to fix the 6 problem; without it, the City is back to square one. He stated that if this developer walks away, the 7 City has one (1) less player to help solve the problem. 8 9 Chairman Wright stated that he does not have a problem moving forward with the preliminary plat, 10 with everyone having the knowledge that it will not go any further if the drainage issues are not 11 worked out. 12 13 Chairman Wright announced at 10:05 p.m. that the Commission would be going into Executive 14 Session. 15 16 The meeting was called back to order by Chairman Wright at 10:37 p.m.,and he asked City Attorney 17 Wayne Olson if any action was necessary as a result of the Executive Session. Mr. Olson stated that 18 there was no action necessary. 19 20 Motion was made to deny ZA97-079. 21 IPMotion: Edmondson Second: Creighton Ayes: Edmondson, Creighton, LeVrier 25 Nays: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy 26 Vote: 3-4 27 Motion failed. 28 29 Motion was made to approve ZA97-079 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 30 1997. 31 32 Motion: Tate 33 Second: Jones 34 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy 35 Nays: Edmondson, Creighton, LeVrier 36 Approved: 4-3 37 Motion carried. 38 39 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#5851) 40 41 Chairman Wright called for a recess at 10:46 p.m. 42 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 10:58 p.m. to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 11 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 1 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 97-023, SITE PLAN OF CHEVRON, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VILLAGE SCENTER: Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of Chevron on 4 property described as Lot 1, Block 1,Village Center, and being approximately 0.934 acres situated 5 in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The property is located on the northeast corner 6 of the intersection of Village Center Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current 7 zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor 8 Recommendation is Village Center. The applicant is Chevron Products Company. The owner is T 9 & M Southlake Development. Six(6)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' 10 notification area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor. 11 12 Don Walker(Chevron Products Company) 9150 Royal Lane, Suite 170, Irving, Texas, presented this 13 item to the Commission. Mr. Walker stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Review 14 Comments. 15 16 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Walker if this store will be open twenty-four (24) hours, and 17 he said that it would. She asked him what hours they are allowed to sell beer, and he said that he 18 thinks it is until midnight during the week and until 1:00 a.m. on the weekend. 19 20 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 21 22 Patty Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that she met with Mr. Silverman to 07 discuss this gas station and that the neighborhood still is of the opinion that Mr. Silverman lied to them by telling them there would never be a gas station in Village Center. She said the neighborhood would rather have a first-class restaurant on this pad site. She said they had a verbal 26 agreement with Mr. Silverman that there would not be a gas station. She asked that the Commission 27 make Mr. Silverman uphold his promise. Ms. Minder stated that the neighbors asked Mr. Silverman 28 to call Chevron and ask them to withdraw; Mr. Silverman told them that he did ask Chevron to 29 withdraw and they would not do it. She said that Chevron promotes drinking and driving by placing 30 single bottles of beer in ice next to the register. She said this intersection is already dangerous 31 without introducing alcohol into the picture. She asked the Commission to deny this request. 32 33 Dona Schroetke, 211 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, agreed with everything Ms. Minder said 34 previously. She wanted to let the Commission and everyone know how disappointed she is in Mr. 35 Silverman because he lied to her and her neighbors. She stated that she is disappointed in Chevron, 36 too, because they are moving forward with this application knowing full well the controversy 37 associated with this site. She stated that the initial concept plan of Village Center had a bank shown 38 on this pad site and questioned whether or not the Commission could hold Mr. Silverman to that 39 concept plan. 40 41 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 42 43 Planner Dennis Killough stated that he evaluates lot sizes, building envelopes, and driveway 44 locations to determine substantial conformity of the site plan when compared to the concept plan. • Plann ma and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3 1997 Page 12 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION 0 Motion was made to approve ZA97-023 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 27, 1997. 3 4 Motion: LeVrier 5 Second: Murphy 6 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Murphy 7 Nays: Edmondson, Creighton 8 Approved: 5-2 9 Motion carried. 10 11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#918) 12 13 AGENDA ITEM #14, ZA 97-024, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED 14 BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION), LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VILLAGE CENTER: 15 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Specific Use Permit for 16 the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption for Chevron, per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, 17 Section 45.1 (1) and 45.6 (a and b) on property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Village Center, and 18 being approximately 0.934 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The 19 property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Village Center Drive and Southlake 20 Boulevard(F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The Land Use 21 Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Village Center. The applicant is Chevron 0 Products Company. The owner is T&M Southlake Development. Six(6)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received which was 24 in favor. 25 26 Don Walker(Chevron Products Company) 9150 Royal Lane, Suite 170, Irving, Texas, presented this 27 item to the Commission. Mr. Walker stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Review 28 Comments. 29 30 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 31 32 Patty Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, asked the Commission to deny this request 33 for beer sales. 34 35 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 36 37 Commissioner LeVrier asked the applicant what percentage his beer sales are of his total sales. Mr. 38 Walker stated that typically it is less than 5% of the overall sales for a particular site. 39 40 Commissioner Edmondson asked Mr. Walker if Chevron intends to sell single bottles and cans of 41 beer on ice next to the register. Mr. Walker stated that he is uncertain if this permit allows for that 42 sort of thing. He stated that he wants to be on equal footing with other stores in town; if they are oable to sell beer by the bottle, then he feels that this store should be able to, also. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 13 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION 60 Motion was made to approve ZA97-024 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 27, 1997. 3 4 Motion: Murphy 5 Second: Tate 6 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Murphy 7 Nays: Edmondson, Creighton 8 Approved: 5-2 9 Motion carried. 10 11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#1119) 12 13 Chairman Wright announced at 12:02 a.m. that the Commission would be going into Executive 14 Session. 15 16 The meeting was called back to order by Chairman Wright at 12:06 a.m.,and he asked City Attorney 17 Wayne Olson if any action was necessary as a result of the Executive Session. Mr. Olson stated that 18 there was no action necessary. 19 20 AGENDA ITEM#15,ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480,ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR 21 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS (WITH OR WITHOUT CONVENIENCE STORES, CAR S WASHES AND OTHER RELATED ANCILLARY USES); AGENDA ITEM#16,ZA 97-069,SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL EYECARE AN D PROFESSIONAL 24 OFFICES FOR DR. WALLACE RYNE, D.O.; 25 AGENDA ITEM #17, ZA 97-070, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 12R1 AND 26 12R2, BLOCK 2, DIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES; 27 AGENDA ITEM#18, ZA 97-080, REZONING OF A PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BAKER 28 ESTATES, AND 29 AGENDA ITEM# 19, ZA 97-071, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 1R AND 2R, 30 BLOCK 1, BAKER ESTATES: 31 Motion was made to continue Agenda Items #15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 and to continue the Public 32 Hearings until the July 10, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission continuation meeting. 33 34 Motion: Murphy 35 Second: Creighton 36 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 37 Nays: None 38 Approved: 7-0 39 Motion carried. 40 41 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-03-97, tape 1, section#1186) 42 4 THE REMAINDER OF THE ITEMS WERE HEARD THE EVENING OF JULY 10, 1997. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 14 of 22 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION 0 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice-Chairman James Murphy; Commissioners Ann Creighton, Debra Edmondson, Rob Jones, F. C. LeVrier, and Lanny Tate 3 4 COMMISSION ABSENT: None 5 6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Debra Drayovitch, Community Development Director 7 Greg Last,Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, City Engineer Ron Harper, Planner Chris Carpenter, 8 and Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell 9 10 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:07 p.m. 11 12 AGENDA ITEM#16,ZA 97-069, SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL EYECARE AND PROFESSIONAL 13 OFFICES FOR DR. WALLACE RYNE, D.O.: 14 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of the proposed 15 Lots 12R1 and 12R2, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, on property legally described as being Lot 16 12, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, 17 according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. 18 The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 19 1709)and Diamond Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The 20 Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Residential. The owner is 21 Diamond I Ltd. The applicant is FDB Architects. Seven (7) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses were received.• 24 Dr. Wallace Ryne, 809 Boston Drive, Southlake, Texas, and Fred Ballinger (FDB Architects) 1240 25 Southridge Court, Suite 101, Hurst, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. Dr. Ryne stated 26 that he personally met with the three (3) surrounding closest neighbors, and all are in favor of his 27 request. Mr. Ballinger stated that due to the width of the lot,he is asking for several variances. Mr. 28 Ballinger asked for a variance to Staff Comment Item #3a regarding the requirement of a 5' Type 29 A bufferyard along the east property line of Lot 12R2. Mr. Ballinger stated that he has obtained a 30 document for a common access easement between this lot and the lot to the east. He stated that he 31 cannot have a bufferyard on the east side if he has a common access easement. Mr. Ballinger asked 32 for a variance to Items #6a(driveway spacing) and #6b (driveway throat depth for stacking). He 33 stated that Lot 12R1 will not be developed until Dr. Ryne finds a suitable purchaser of that lot and 34 asked that Item#10a be waived at this time. Mr. Ballinger asked for the Commission to approve the 35 building articulation as presented and waive the requirements of Item #10c. He stated that due to 36 the covered parking being on the east side of the building, there is not much articulation that can be 37 accomplished on that side. He stated that the north wall of the building cannot be seen by the 38 residential properties or from Southlake Boulevard and asked that the articulation requirements and 39 the building setback requirements (Item #10c) be waived at this time. 40 41 Commissioner Creighton asked if the applicant considered placing one (1) multi-tenant building on 42 this site. Mr. Ballinger stated that it is too much site for one (1) building; Dr. Ryne does not need 6 that much building. Dr. Ryne stated that he does not want to be in the landlord business and that a 6,000 s.f. building would cost considerably more money. He stated that the way his loan is Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 15 of 22 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION S structured, the bank will not loan him the money to build extra space to lease. He stated that he is intending to sell Lot 12R1 with a contract stating that he has ultimate architectural control over the 3 type of building placed on that site. He stated that his building and equipment alone will cost him 4 approximately $810,000.00 and that it is in his best interest to see that a nice building goes in next 5 to him. 6 7 Chairman Wright asked City staff if a Site Plan for Lot 12R1 would need approval from the Planning 8 and Zoning Commission and from City Council. Community Development Director Greg Last 9 stated that Lot 12R1 would need Site Plan approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and 10 from City Council in order to obtain a building permit. Mr. Last stated that it needs to be made clear 11 that there is no approval being given for Lot 12R1. 12 13 Commissioner LeVrier asked Dr. Ryne if he would be willing to eliminate the covered parking. Dr. 14 Ryne stated that he would be willing to remove the covered parking, but he thought it looked better 15 than having cars parked on Southlake Boulevard. 16 17 Commissioner Creighton asked, if the bufferyard requirement listed in Item#3a were deleted, if the 18 applicant would be willing to place the required plantings elsewhere on the site. Dr. Ryne stated that 19 he would be willing to plant them elsewhere. 20 21 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he is concerned about a precedent being set for other small lots on Southlake Boulevard if the Commission allows so many variances on this application. • 24 Mr. Ballinger stated that he would be willing to take 2' off the length of the covered parking garage 25 and add a 2' indention into the west wall in order to better meet the articulation requirements on the 26 west wall. 27 28 Commissioner Jones asked Mr. Ballinger if he would willing to angle the dumpster in order for it 29 not to face Southlake Boulevard, and Mr. Ballinger agreed to angle it as much as it possible. 30 31 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 32 33 Jackie Humphrey stated she is very impressed with Dr. Ryne's proposal. She stated that she likes 34 the covered parking because it keeps the cars from view. She stated that she liked the fact that Dr. 35 Ryne is a Southlake resident and that the building will be owner occupied. She said she appreciated 36 the fact that he properly contacted the surrounding residents and showed them plans of what he 37 wants to do. She stated that she is Vice-President of the Diamond Circle Homeowners Association 38 and has spoken to many of the residents and no one has voiced any concerns to her about this 39 application. She stated that she thinks Dr. Ryne will be a good neighbor. 40 41 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 42 ' Commissioner Edmondson asked the applicant if he would be willing to reduce his lighting to 400- watt metal halide lamps instead of 1,000-watt lamps, and Dr. Ryne agreed to evaluate the lighting. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 16 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION S Commissioner Creighton asked if the applicant would agree to one(1)monument sign instead of two (2) separate signs. Dr. Ryne stated that he understands there is a setback requirement for each sign 3 but did agree to downsize the signs instead. He also agreed not to back-light the signs and possibly 4 even put the lights on timers to turn off at 10:00 p.m. Commissioner Creighton asked that the 5 applicant and City Council take another look at the sign issues on this site. 6 7 Motion was made to approve ZA97-069 subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated 8 July 10, 1997, deleting Item #3a (5' Type A bufferyard), but stipulating that the plantings will be 9 placed elsewhere on the site, and that the dumpster will be angled as to not be perpendicular with 10 Southlake Boulevard and permitting 2'-3'encroachment of the dumpster into the bufferyard; deleting 11 Items #6a (driveway spacing) and #6b (driveway throat depths); forgiving the articulation 12 requirements for the north and east walls; deleting Item#11 (40' rear setback); acknowledging that 13 Item #l0a (elevations on Lot 12R1) will be required at a later date; and acknowledging the 14 applicant's agreement to evaluate the lighting and use the minimum amount needed. 15 16 Motion: Murphy 17 Second: Creighton 18 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 19 Nays: None 20 Approved: 7-0 21 Motion carried. 40 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-10-97, tape 1, section #2254) 2 25 AGENDA ITEM #17, ZA 97-070, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 12R1 AND 26 12R2, BLOCK 2, DIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES: 27 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Plat Revision for the 28 proposed Lots 12R1 and 12R2, Block 2, Diamond Circle Estates, being a revision of Lot 12, Block 29 2, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according 30 to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being 31 approximately 0.919 acres situated in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 687. The property is 32 located on the northeast corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and 33 Diamond Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use 34 Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Residential. The owner is Diamond I 35 Ltd. The applicant is FDB Architects. Five (5)written notices were sent to property owners within 36 the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 37 38 Fred Ballinger(FDB Architects) 1240 Southridge Court, Suite 101, Hurst, Texas, presented this item 39 to the Commission. Mr. Ballinger asked for exception to Staff Comment Items #10 (minimum lot 40 width of 125') and #11 (minimum 30,000 s.f. lot area). 41 42 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Ballinger if he had any idea of when the Common Access d, o, Easement Agreement might be executed, and Dr. Ryne stated that he should get it in a matter of a few days. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 17 of 22 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION • Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 3 - 4 Motion was made to approve ZA97-070, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 5 1997, deleting Items#10 (minimum lot width of 125') and #11 (minimum 30,000 s.f. lot area). 6 7 Motion: Murphy 8 Second: Creighton 9 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 10 Nays: None 11 Approved: 7-0 12 Motion carried. 13 14 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-10-97, tape 1, section #2523) 15 16 AGENDA ITEM#18,ZA 97-080, REZONING OF A PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BAKER 17 ESTATES: 18 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Zoning Change on 19 property described as being a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, an addition to the City of 20 Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat 21 Records, Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 1.2983 acres. The property is located on the west side of South Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Boardwalk Avenue and South Peytonville Avenue. The current zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. The flO requested zoning is "RE" Residential Estate District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density 25 Residential. The owners and applicants are Brandon and Charlotte Baker. Four (4) written notices 26 were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 27 28 Brandon Baker presented this item to the Commission. He asked for the Commission's approval 29 on this application. 30 31 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 32 33 Mike Lease, 370 S. Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas, stated that the Bakers are good neighbors 34 and feels that they should be allowed to build their barn. 35 36 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 37 38 Motion was made to approve ZA97-080. 39 40 Motion: Edmondson 41 Second: Murphy 42 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton ' Nays: None Approved: 7-0 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 18 of 22 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 0 Motion carried. 3 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-10-97, tape 1, section#2754 4 5 AGENDA ITEM # 19, ZA 97-071, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 1R AND 2R, 6 BLOCK 1, BAKER ESTATES: 7 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Plat Revision for the 8 proposed Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates, being a revision of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, 9 Baker Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat 10 recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is located on 11 the west side of South Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Boardwalk Avenue and South 12 Peytonville Avenue. The current zoning is "RE" Residential Estate District and "SF-1A" Single 13 Family Residential District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The owners 14 and applicants are Brandon and Charlotte Baker. Two (2) written notices were sent to property 15 owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 16 17 Brandon Baker presented this item to the Commission. 18 19 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked City staff to clarify the intent of Staff Comment Item #11c (add 20 "Utility Easement" to the existing drainage easements). City Engineer Ron Harper stated that there 21 is an existing drainage easement down the center of Lot 1 and an existing utility easement on the rear S of Lot 1 which the applicant is requesting to abandon. Mr. Harper stated that it is an "either-or" situation; either the Bakers can leave the easement on the back of Lot 1 and have two (2) separate 24 easements, or they can move it forward in conjunction with the existing drainage easement which 25 would unencumber 15' along the back of Lot 1. 26 27 Mr. Baker stated that his problem with the easement is that he has heard that the City is planning to 28 put a 12" sewer line down the middle of his property. Mr. Harper stated that the City has no plans 29 to place that sewer line any time soon, but it would be a logical location when they decide to do it. 30 Mr. Harper stated that the City hopes to eliminate the lift station on Stonebury's south property line 31 eventually. 32 33 Chairman Wright asked Mr. Baker which easement he would rather have, and Mr. Baker stated that 34 he does not want either one. Mr. Baker stated that he has been very generous on drainage easements 35 to the City of Southlake. 36 37 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 38 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 39 40 Chairman Wright stated that he feels the applicant wins because he ends up with one (1) easement 41 instead of two (2). He suggested that the easement be labeled for "water, sewer, and drainage" only, 42 eliminating the possibility of telephone poles being run down the middle of the Baker's property. 46, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 19 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION 40 Motion was made to approve ZA97-071, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 1997, amending Item #11 c to restrict the language in the north/south drainage easement to "water, 3 sanitary sewer, and drainage easement." 4 5 Motion: Murphy • 6 Second: Jones 7 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 8 Nays: None 9 Approved: 7-0 10 Motion carried. 11 12 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-10-97, tape 1, section#3543) 13 14 Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:54 p.m. 15 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 9:10 p.m. 16 17 Commissioner Jones had to leave the meeting to attend to personal business. 18 19 AGENDA ITEM #15, ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480-Z, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS 20 FOR GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS(WITH OR WITHOUT CONVENIENCE STORES,CAR 21 WASHES AND OTHER RELATED ANCILLARY USES): S Chairman Wright announced at 9:10 p.m. that the Commission would be going into Executive Session. 24 25 The meeting was called back to order by Chairman Wright at 9:25 p.m., and he asked City Attorney 26 Debra Drayovitch if any action was necessary as a result of the Executive Session. Ms. Drayovitch 27 stated that there was no action necessary. 28 29 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy presented this item to the Commission and stated that the 30 Service Station Work Group recommends that service stations only be allowed in the "C-3" General 31 Commercial Zoning District with an S.U.P. She stated that any Corridor and underlying zoning 32 requirements will still be in place, but there are several additional items that the Work Group 33 suggested for evaluation of an application: 34 35 • if the service station is on the F. M. 1709 Corridor, it should be located at a signalized, 36 arterial intersection; 37 • if the service station is on the State Highway 114 Corridor, it would be permitted mid-block. 38 39 Ms. Gandy also brought up the issue of whether or not the City could prohibit service stations within 40 1,000' of a school and stated that the City Attorneys are researching that aspect. 41 42 Ms. Gandy also stated that it was the recommendation of the Work Group that any air and water ohoses at service stations be available to anyone who needs them and be free of charge. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 20 of 22 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION EllMs. Gandy stated that the Work Group recommended a minimum of 125' setback for the buildings, canopies, and pump islands if the service station is adjacent to residential. She stated that the Work 3 Group did not want to make any changes on F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938, and State Highway 114, 4 regarding the minimum setback for buildings being 50', but allowing canopies to encroach into that 5 setback and still maintain a 25' setback from the right-of-way. 6 7 Vice-Chairman Murphy suggested restricting the hours of operation of the car wash when the site 8 is adjacent to residential. 9 10 Chairman Wright agreed with Vice-Chairman Murphy, but stated that he thinks the hours of 11 operation for the car wash should only be regulated within a certain distance from residential. 12 13 After discussion, the Commission agreed to the following statement: "The hours of any car wash 14 operation may be limited when adjacent to residentially-zoned property." 15 16 Chairman Wright stated that he thinks that car washes on F.M. 1709 should be required to have a 17 gabled or hipped roof as do convenience stores and canopies. 18 19 The Commission agreed to emphasize that the support columns of the canopy would also be of a 20 similar masonry material. 21 Commissioner LeVrier suggested that it be stated that the finish material of a car wash match the building. 420 25 Commissioner Edmondson stated that the Corridor Overlay Study states that the use of standard, 26 concrete block shall be limited to 10% of any facade visible from any adjacent, public right-of-way. 27 She questioned if this statement would give applicants an opening to do the entire car wash in 28 concrete block; she was uncertain if this statement meant 10% of all buildings combined or 10% of 29 each building. Ms. Gandy stated that she would research which language would give us the same 30 building material. 31 32 Ms. Gandy stated that she is deleting service stations as a permitted use in the "C-1" and "C-2" 33 zoning districts. She stated that the minimum floor area for a convenience store is 2,000 s.£, the 34 minimum lease space within that store is 500 s.f., and any ancillary use or free-standing car wash 35 would have to be a minimum of 500 s.f. 36 37 Regarding lighting requirements, Chairman Wright suggested the following change: 38 39 ". . .Such lighting shall be designated to light the pump area adequately without becoming 40 an unnecessary nuisance to traffic or citizens' nearby property." 41 42 Regarding signage, Commissioner Creighton stated that she would also like to restrict service stations on F.M. 1938 to one (1) monument sign, as are service stations on F.M. 1709. She also 40 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 21 of 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION S stated that she would like to clean up the language to ensure that only one (1) monument sign is allowed on all service station sites. 3 4 Commissioner Edmondson questioned whether or not the number of pumps could be limited. 5 6 Commissioner Edmondson asked whether or not this ordinance could require applicants to place 7 only double-walled fuel tanks,and Chairman Wright stated that he thinks that is a good idea but does 8 not think this ordinance is the place to state that requirement. 9 10 Commissioner Edmondson also stated that she would like to increase the landscaping requirements 11 and require seasonal color plantings. City Attorney Debra Drayovitch stated that she is unsure 12 whether the City could place more restrictive landscaping requirements on a particular type of use 13 and not on all commercial uses. 14 15 The Commission agreed to table this item to the July 17, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission 16 meeting and to continue the Public Hearing. 17 18 AGENDA ITEM #20, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 19 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:25 p.m. on July 10, 1997. 20 21 Motion: Tate 0 Second: Murphy Ayes: Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton Nays: None 25 Approved: 6-0 26 Motion carried. 27 28 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-10-97, tape 1, section#5986) 29 30 31 34 Joe Wright 35 Chairman 36 37 38 ATTEST: 39 40 iir 43 Lori A. Farwell 44 Community Development Secretary S Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 3, 1997 Page 22 of 22 M .. UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION • REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING July 17, 1997 1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice-Chairman James Murphy; Commissioners 2 Ann Creighton, Debra Edmondson, Rob Jones, F. C. LeVrier, and Lanny Tate 3 4 COMMISSION ABSENT: None 5 6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Wayne K. Olson,Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy,City 7 Engineer Ron Harper, Planner Chris Carpenter, Planner Dennis Killough, and Community 8 Development Secretary Lori Farwell 9 10 WORK SESSION: The work session was held to discuss agenda items by the Commission and the 11 staff. 12 13 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 7:02 p.m. 14 15 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 16 Chairman Wright opened discussion of the minutes of the July 3, 1997, Regular Planning and 17 Zoning Commission meeting. • Motion was made to approve the July 3, 1997,Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes 20 as presented. 21 22 Motion: Murphy 23 Second: Tate 24 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 25 Nays: None 26 Approved: 7-0 27 Motion carried. 28 29 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section #1113) 30 31 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 32 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy reminded the Commission of their work session on July 24, 33 1997, with the SPIN standing committee. She also informed the Commission of a COG class 34 available to them on September 12, 1997. She asked them to inform Community Development 35 Secretary Lori Farwell if they want to attend. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#1135) 38 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 97-062, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 3R-1, J.G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADDITION: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 1 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION ipMotion was made at the applicant's request to withdraw ZA 97-062. 3 Motion: Murphy 4 Second: Edmondson 5 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 6 Nays: None 7 Approved: 7-0 8 Motion carried. 9 10 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#1161) 11 12 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA 97-081, SITE PLAN ON THE PROPOSED LOT 2, COMMERCE 13 SQUARE: 14 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA97-081 and to continue the Public Hearing 15 to the August 7, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 16 17 Motion: Murphy 18 Second: Creighton 19 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 20 Nays: None 4 Approved: 7-0 Motion carried. 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#1182) 25 26 AGENDA ITEM#9, ZA 97-085, SITE PLAN FOR SOLANA PARK CIRCLE: 27 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA97-085 and to continue the Public Hearing 28 to the August 21, 1977, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 29 30 Motion: Murphy 31 Second: Creighton 32 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 33 Nays: None 34 Approved: 7-0 35 Motion carried. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#1203) 38 39 AGENDA ITEM #16, ZA 97-021, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMBER LAKE 40 ESTATES: 41 Motion was made at the applicant's request to withdraw ZA 97-021. 42 0 Motion: Murphy Second: Creighton Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 2 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION 40 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton Nays: None 3 Approved: 7-0 4 Motion carried. 5 6 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#1223) 7 8 AGENDA ITEM#5,ZA 97-083,REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR T. W. KING WATER 9 STORAGE TANK AND TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER: 10 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this item is for a zoning change on property 11 legally described as 4.5 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. The 12 property is located on the west side of T. W. King Road approximately 700' south of the intersection 13 of West Bob Jones Road and T. W. King Road. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. 14 The requested zoning is "CS" Community Service District. The Land Use Category is Medium 15 Density Residential. The Owner and Applicant is the City of Southlake. Ten(10) written notices 16 were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received 17 which was opposed. 18 19 Mr. Carpenter stated that the correct height for the elevated storage tank is 165' and asked the 20 Commissioners to make that correction on the Concept Plan. IliEddie Cheatham (Cheatham &Associates) 1601 E. Lamar Boulevard, Suite 200, Arlington, Texas, ., and Johnny Knight(Deputy Director of Support Services for the Department of Public Safety) 650 24 Cherry Court, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. Mr. Knight stated that the 25 Denton County Sheriff's Department contacted the City of Southlake regarding the possibility of 26 placing a tower on this site because they have been having problems with radial coverage and 27 emergency service calls. He stated that both the City of Southlake and Denton County are having 28 problems with coverage and that this site is a good location due to the topography of the area. 29 30 Commissioner Creighton asked City staff if the Trophy Club residents adjacent to this site have been 31 notified of this application. Mr. Carpenter stated that it is the City's policy to send a courtesy notice 32 to the City of Trophy Club, and it would be up to them to further notify their residents. 33 34 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 35 36 William Lamoreaux stated that he is in favor of the water storage tank and opposed to the 37 telecommunication tower. He stated that this site is located in a residentially-designated area, and 38 the telecommunication tower should not be there. 39 40 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 41 42 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked if this tower could possibly serve as a joint-use site with a cellular 0 company or a long distance provider, and Mr. Knight stated that it is possible for the City to lease space to these types of companies and that the City will consider that option in the future. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 3 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 411? Commissioner Edmondson asked if the City's needs would be met if this tower were 100' shorter. Mr. Knight stated that if the tower were 100' shorter, it would reduce the area of coverage by 3 approximately 12 to 14 miles. 4 5 Commissioner Creighton asked what the City of Southlake gets in exchange for providing coverage 6 to the surrounding cities. Mr. Knight stated that the City currently leases space from the City of Fort 7 Worth, and if their site goes down,the City of Southlake does not have another site to build to. He 8 also stated that the City of Southlake's portion of the City of Fort Worth's radio system is full, and 9 cannot be added to without considerable cost. Mr. Knight stated that the cost of construction, 10 maintenance, and insurance for the telecommunication tower will be paid by Denton County. 11 12 Chairman Wright asked what the maximum height allowed for an antenna on top of the water tower 13 would be, and Mr. Ron Harper stated that structurally,a 50' antenna could probably be placed on top 14 the water tower. 15 16 Mr. Knight stated that currently there are portions of Southlake where the Department of Public 17 Safety cannot operate their mobile phones, radios, and/or pagers. 18 19 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked City staff if they feel the Commission would be setting an unhealthy 20 precedent for cellular companies if they were to allow the height variance for this tower. Zoning 1 Administrator Karen Gandy stated that she feels the demand for cellular service is going to be increasing in the future. She stated that the 120' height restriction seems to be adequate for the cellular providers she has spoken to. She further pointed out that the zoning ordinance does exempt 24 governmental entities' and franchised public utilities' communication antennas or communication 25 structures, utility poles and towers, and water tanks from height restrictions. 26 27 Commissioner LeVrier stated that any other applicant would have to meet the requirements of the 28 2:1 ratio,and he feels the City of Southlake should,too. He stated that he thinks this site is too small 29 for a tower of the height requested and to place this tower so close to residential would be placing 30 those residents at a great risk if the tower ever collapsed. 31 32 Chairman Wright suggested allowing the City the option to build a 50' antenna on top of the water 33 tower if they need to. 34 35 Motion was made to approve ZA97-083, approving the water tower as presented and limiting the 36 telecommunication tower to 120', granting no variances with the exception of Items #1a, lb and if 37 and requiring the type of tower to be determined by engineers. 38 39 Motion: LeVrier 40 Second: Murphy 41 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 42 Nays: None Approved: 7-0 Motion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 4 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 1110 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section #2538) 3 AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA 97-084, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR T. W. KING 4 TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER: 5 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this item is a Specific Use Permit for a 6 Telecommunication Tower on the property described as 4.5 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, 7 Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. The property is located on the west side of T. W. King Road 8 approximately 700' south of the intersection of West Bob Jones Road and T. W. King Road. The 9 current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The proposed zoning is "CS" Community Service 10 District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The Owner and Applicant is the 11 City of Southlake. Nine(9)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification 12 area, and one (1) response was received which was opposed. 13 14 Johnny Knight (Deputy Director of Support Services for the Department of Public Safety) 650 15 Cherry Court, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission 16 17 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 18 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 19 20 Motion was made to approve ZA97-084, limiting the telecommunication tower to 120', granting no variances with the exception of Items#la, lb and 1 f and requiring the type of tower to be determined by engineers. 24 Motion: LeVrier 25 Second: Murphy 26 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 27 Nays: None 28 Approved: 7-0 29 Motion carried. 30 31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#2739) 32 33 AGENDA ITEM#7,ZONING ORDINANCE NO.480-Z,ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR 34 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS (WITH OR WITHOUT CONVENIENCE STORES, CAR 35 WASHES AND OTHER RELATED ANCILLARY USES); 36 Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy presented this item to the Commission. The Commission 37 continued their discussion regarding restricting the hours of operation for car washes adjacent to 38 residential. City Attorney Wayne K. Olson stated his concern about the defensibility of that unless 39 a rational basis can be documented and reasonable hours can be determined for requiring such a 40 restriction. 41 42 Commissioner Edmondson stated that she wants to see these residential adjacency issues spelled out illin this ordinance and for them not to be delayed to a later ordinance revision. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 5 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP & Z COMMISSION Vice-Chairman Murphy asked City staff if there is a way they can start measuring decibels of noise • 2 which affect setbacks and types of uses. Mr. Olson stated that he feels that is a good idea but does 3 not think the Commission even needs to go that far. 4 5 Mr. Olson offered an alternative means of accomplishing the same protection without drawing a 6 possible challenge of interfering with interstate commerce. He suggested reviewing alternative 7 methods of reducing the impact of these uses, such as, the placement of berms, additional planting 8 materials, and fencing where additional protections were warranted. He stated that using these 9 methods rather than restricting, hours of operation might avoid drawing challenges of interfering 10 with interstate commerce. 11 12 Ms. Gandy stated that many of the Commission's concerns might be better addressed in the revisions 13 to the Corridor Overlay Study where they can be applied to all uses within the Corridor. 14 15 Commissioner Edmondson questioned how soon the City is going to start making these revisions 16 in the Corridor Overlay Study and stated that she feels very uncomfortable putting off these 17 decisions to a later date. She asked City staff when that day would come. Ms. Gandy stated that she 18 is working diligently on several ordinances already as set forth in the priority listing from the 19 Council. Commissioner Edmondson stated that she would like to hear from the City Council when 20 the revisions to the Corridor Overlay Study will be made. 6 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he is concerned with the statement regarding the restriction of service stations located within 1,000' of a public school and will not include that in his motion. 24 25 Under "Development Regulations," Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he would like to leave in 26 both the stricken sentence regarding the pitched roof requirement and the stricken sentence regarding 27 the types of building materials. 28 29 Commissioner Creighton stated that the only thing she disagrees with Commissioner Murphy on is 30 that she would like to see all signage subject to the current sign ordinance requirements. 31 32 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 33 34 Frank Putt, 2 Palomino Court, Trophy Club, Texas, stated that he objects to service stations and dry 35 cleaning plants being eliminated from the "C-2" zoning district. 36 37 Ms. Gandy stated that dry cleaning operations are not under consideration tonight and that there are 38 no proposed changes to dry cleaning operations at this time. 39 40 David Johnson, 823 Pearl, Southlake, Texas, stated that he deals with noise levels on a daily basis 41 in his profession. He said that there are several businesses in the area who measure noise levels and 42 train personnel to operate the testing equipment. He thinks the Commission can legally place S requirements on businesses regarding items such as noise levels and its footage from adjacent residential properties and have it upheld in court. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 6 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION IPChairman Wright closed the public hearing. 3 Motion was made to approve Zoning Ordinance No. 480-Z, limiting the hours of operation on car 4 washes adjacent to residentially zoned properties; stating that the dumpsters shall not be placed 5 within 50' of residentially zoned property; requiring a pitched roof on service stations; requiring 6 building materials on all exterior facades to be constructed of the same material 7 8 Motion: Murphy 9 Second: Tate 10 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 11 Nays: None 12 Approved: 7-0 13 Motion carried. 14 15 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he would like to recommend to City Council that certain 16 residential adjacency issues, such as: noise attenuation, lighting and residential-style roof design be 17 addressed in either amendments to the corridor overlay zone or neighborhood preservation ordinance 18 draft as well as an amendment to the sign ordinance defining readerboard signs needed by service 19 stations for "replaceable pricing." 20 21 (Planning, and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section#5348) r Chairman Wrightcalled for a recess at 8:56 p.m. g 24 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 9:07 p.m. 25 26 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA 97-086, REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE WOODS 27 AND STONEBURY: 28 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is a Revised Concept Plan for 29 Southlake Woods and Stonebury, on property legally described as being approximately 73.9846 30 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500,being Tracts 2A4, 2A5, and a portion of 31 2A2; the T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502, being Tracts 1D, 2, 2A2, 2A3 and 2B; and 32 being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, 33 Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas. 34 The property is located north of Continental Boulevard, west of Peytonville Avenue, east of Davis 35 Boulevard, and south of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "SF-20A" Single 36 Family Residential District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The Owner 37 is Toll Brothers, Inc. The Applicant is Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. Thirty-seven (37) 38 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'notification area, and four(4) responses 39 were received, one (1) of which was opposed, two (2) were undecided, and one (1) was in favor. 40 41 Elvio Bruni (Toll Brothers, Inc.) 2210 Stanford Court, McKinney, Texas, presented this item to the 42 Commission. He stated that Lot 1, Block 1, which is located on Continental Boulevard, will only 0 be open space; it will not be an amenity center. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 7 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 3 4 Motion was made to approve ZA97-086, subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated 5 July 11, 1997. 6 7 Motion: Murphy 8 Second: Tate 9 Ayes: Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 10 Nays: None 11 Abstain: Jones 12 Approved: 6-0-1 13 Motion carried. 14 15 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section #5751) 16 17 AGENDA ITEM#11,ZA 97-087,REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTHLAKE WOODS 18 AND STONEBURY: 19 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Revised Preliminary Plat 20 for Southlake Woods and Stonebury,being legally described as 113.04 Acres being Tracts 2A4,2A5 21 ii• and 2A2 in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; Tracts 1D, 2, 2A, 2A2, 2A3 and 2B, T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502; a Plat Revision of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Airpark Estates, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 99, P.R.T.C.T.; and being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, 24 an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in 25 Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is located north of 26 Continental Boulevard,west of Peytonville Avenue,east of Davis Boulevard,and south of Southlake 27 Boulevard(F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. The 28 Land Use Category is Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. The owner is 29 Toll Brothers, Inc. The applicant is Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. Fifty-three (53) 30 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and five (5) 31 responses were received One (1) of which was opposed, two (2) were undecided, and two (2) 32 were in favor. 33 34 Elvio Bruni (Toll Brothers, Inc.) 2210 Stanford Court, McKinney, Texas, presented this item to the 35 Commission. He asked for a variance to Item#11 which addresses a 30' building setback on four 36 (4) lots in lieu of a 35' building setback. 37 38 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 39 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 40 41 Motion was made to approve ZA97-087, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 42 1997, deleting Item #11 (building setback). 0 Motion: Murphy Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 8 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION lip Second: Tate Ayes: Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 3 Nays: None 4 Abstain: Jones 5 Approved: 6-0-1 6 Motion carried. 7 8 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section #6074) 9 10 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA 97-088, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 8R, 8X 11 (COMMON AREA NO. 2), 10R, 11R, 12R, AND 13R, BLOCK 2, AND LOT 13R, BLOCK 1, 12 STONEBURY: 13 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Plat Revision for the 14 proposed Lots 8R, 8X(Common Area No. 2), 10R, 11R, 12R,and 13R,Block 2,and Lot 13R,Block 15 1, Stonebury, being a revision of Lots 8 through 13, Block 2, and Lot 13, Block 1, Stonebury, an 16 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 17 A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and a portion of Tract 2A2 situated in the W. 18 R. Eaves Survey,Abstract 500. The property is located on Stonebury Drive approximately 700'west 19 of the intersection of South Peytonville Avenue and Stonebury Drive. The current zoning is "SF- 20 20A" Single Family Residential District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. 21 The owner is Toll Brothers, Inc. The applicant is Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. Two (2) 0 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'notification area, and no responses have been received. 24 25 Elvio Bruni (Toll Brothers, Inc.) 2210 Stanford Court, McKinney, Texas, presented this item to the 26 Commission. He stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Comments. 27 28 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 29 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 30 31 Motion was made to approve ZA97-088, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 32 1997. 33 34 Motion: Murphy 35 Second: Tate 36 Ayes: Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 37 Nays: None 38 Abstain: Jones 39 Approved: 6-0-1 40 Motion carried. 41 42 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 1, section #6346) oiAGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 97-089, SITE PLAN FOR OAKMONT PLAZA: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 9 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 40 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is a Site Plan for Oakmont Plaza, on property legally described as being Lot 3, Block 3, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the 3 City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 4 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is located at 316 East Southlake Boulevard 5 (F.M. 1709) on the northwest corner of the intersection of Diamond Boulevard and East Southlake 6 Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "0-1" Office District. The Land Use Category is 7 Mixed Use. The owner and applicant is 2 Diamond Ltd. Eleven (11) written notices were sent to 8 property owners within the 200' notification area, and four (4) responses were received which were 9 all opposed. Twenty-seven(27) responses outside the 200' notification area were received and were 10 all opposed. 11 12 Richard Myers (Realty Capital Corporation) 2425 Southlake Boulevard, Suite 50, Southlake, Texas, 13 presented this item to the Commission. Mr. Myers stated that he has tried to work with the property 14 owner to the west, Gary Yarborough, regarding a common access easement. He stated that, to date, 15 he has had no luck in that endeavor. Mr. Myers stated that he recently received a letter from Mr. 16 Yarborough which stated that he (Mr. Yarborough) was unwilling to grant a common access 17 easement agreement unless Mr. Myers agreed to cut his building size in half. Mr. Myers said that 18 he would be willing to take 100% of the maintenance cost of the shared driveway if he could obtain 19 the common access easement. He stated that, if the City decides to use their condemnation powers 20 to obtain the access easement, he would go ahead and build a temporary drive to his property until 21 the shared drive was obtained; he stated that he would then tear out his existing driveway and build 0 the portion of the new driveway to connect to Mr. Yarborough's property. Mr. Myers stated that, on the north side of his property, he will commit to plantings similar to the ones between Arvida's 24 Southridge Lakes "C-3" property and their residential property, and he will also place a berm similar 25 to their berm. Mr. Myers stated that he is willing to reduce is pitch somewhat in order to meet the 26 4:1 slope line. Mr. Myers also stated that he will articulate the back of the building in order to 27 exceed the articulation requirements. 28 29 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 30 31 Richard O'Day, 921 Emerald Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that he is opposed to this request. He 32 stated that this building dwarfs the surrounding buildings. He stated his discontent with the looks 33 of the back of the building. He stated that this building is too large for this corner and too tall to be 34 adjacent to residential. Mr. O'Day stated that he does not like to think about someone looking into 35 his home and his backyard. He stated that Mr. Myers did not contact him until the night before this 36 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 37 38 Sara Mellinger, 919 Emerald Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that she brought in a response to the 39 City offices. She stated that Mr. Myers did not contact her at all. She is concerned about the 40 windows in the back and on the side of this building. She said she has a very good relationship with 41 the Remax people and that they have always worked with her. She stated that the intersection of 42 Diamond Boulevard and Southlake Boulevard is extremely dangerous and this request will only iii make traffic worse. She stated that she is not opposed to the proper building being placed on this site. She asked that the lights be turned off at night. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 10 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 0 Diane Johnson (President of the Diamond Circle Homeowners Association) stated that Mr. Myers has not contacted her at all. She knew nothing about this request until Mr. O'Day brought it to her 3 attention. She stated that she knew this property was zoned "0-1" Office District, but she never 4 thought that a two (2) story building would be placed there. 5 6 Don Tinkleman, 917 Emerald Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that Mr. Myers needs to address some 7 of these issues being discussed tonight. He stated that Holt Dental has always worked with him and 8 the other property owners, and it is almost like having another house there. 9 10 Joe Coerver (General Counsel for Remax Lone Star and Gary and Gloria Yarborough) 7210 11 Centinary Avenue, Dallas, Texas, stated that they are opposed to this application primarily due to 12 the dual driveways onto Southlake Boulevard. He stated that they would have no problem in 13 granting a common access easement, but they feel the large size of the building will more than 14 double the vehicular use of the access. He believes it is an unreasonable request. He stated that they 15 will not enter into any type of voluntary arrangement with a building of this size. He stated that the 16 building proposed does not meet the height requirements of the City's ordinances. 17 18 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he is troubled by the lack of communication between Mr. Myers 19 and the residential property owners and would like to table this item to allow time for that to occur. 20 21 Commissioner Edmondson stated that she agrees with Vice-Chairman Murphy. She stated that she III is fairly confident that if Mr. Myers met with the home owners, some of their issues would be addressed and dealt with. 24 25 Chairman Wright asked Mr. Myers if he would be willing to opaque the back windows (in order to 26 restrict view out of them), box or inset the side windows (in order to restrict view of the houses in 27 back), enclose the back stairwell and balcony, and articulate the back of the building. Mr. Myers 28 agreed to look at all of these suggestions. 29 30 Commissioner Creighton stated that she would like for the lighting to go off at night. She stated that 31 having two (2) stories might be a positive aspect of this building, and that once the neighbors see the 32 back of the building articulated, they may feel differently. 33 34 Mr. Myers stated that he cannot imagine what else has changed since his original conversation with 35 Remax in order to change their minds, but he has recently signed a letter of intent with a realty 36 company which may be a competitor of Remax Lone Star. 37 38 Vice-Chairman Murphy stated that he would like to see information regarding traffic counts of 39 similar sized buildings the next time Mr. Myers brings this application forward. 40 41 Motion was made at the applicant's request to table ZA97-089 and to continue the Public Hearing 42 to the August 21, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. • Motion: Murphy Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 11 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION 410 Second: Creighton Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 3 Nays: None 4 Approved: 7-0 5 Motion carried. 6 7 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 2, section#1878) 8 9 AGENDA ITEM #14, ZA 97-090, REZONING: 10 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a zoning change on 11 property described as being approximately 3.32 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey,Abstract 12 No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. The property is located at 1496 E. Dove Street approximately 120' 13 west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove Avenue and East Dove Street. The current zoning is 14 "AG" Agricultural District. The requested zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. 15 The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential. The owner is Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins. The 16 applicant is Area Surveying, Inc. Twelve (12) written notices were sent to property owners within 17 the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. 18 19 The applicant was not present to represent this item to the Commission. 20 21 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 0 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 24 Motion was made to approve ZA97-090. 25 26 Motion: Murphy 27 Second: Edmondson 28 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 29 Nays: None 30 Approved: 7-0 31 Motion carried. 32 33 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 2, section#1986) 34 35 AGENDA ITEM#15, ZA 97-091. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 1 AND 36 2. BLOCK 1, HIGGINS ADDITION: 37 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for the 38 proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Higgins Addition, being legally described as approximately 3.32 39 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. The property 40 is located at 1496 E. Dove Street approximately 120' west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove 41 Avenue and East Dove Street. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The Land Use 42 Category is Low Density Residential. The owner is Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins. The applicant is Area 110 Surveying, Inc. Twelve (12) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have been received. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 12 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION alThe applicant was not present to represent this item to the Commission. 3 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 4 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 5 6 Motion was made to approve ZA97-091, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 7 1997. 8 9 Motion: Murphy 10 Second: Jones 11 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 12 Nays: None 13 Approved: 7-0 14 Motion carried. • 15 16 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 2, section#2147) 17 18 AGENDA ITEM #17, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 19 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:52 p.m. on July 17, 1997. 20 21 Motion: Murphy 0 Second: Creighton Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, LeVrier, Edmondson, Murphy, Creighton 24 Nays: None 25 Approved: 7-0 26 Motion carried. 27 28 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-17-97, tape 2, section#2154) 29 30 31 34 Joe Wright 35 Chairman 36 37 38 ATTEST: 39 40 i 43 Lori A. Farwell 44 Community Development Secretary S Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 17, 1997 Page 13 of 13 • 0 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 3 PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING 4 5 July 14, 1997 6 7 MINUTES 8 9 Board Members Present: Larry Goldstein, Doug Fierce, Gary Beyer, Vicki Johnson, Ronnie 10 Kendall, Carol Lee Hamilton, Robin Jones and Richard Anderson. 11 12 Members Absent: Sherry Berman. 13 14 City Staff Present: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation; Teddi R. Zonker, 15 Administrative Secretary; Kathy Schaeffer, Recreation Supervisor; Ben Henry, Park Planning 16 and Construction Superintendent; Shelli Seimer, Community Services Coordinator and Shana 17 Yelverton, Assistant City Manager. 18 19 The meeting was called to order at 6:38 p.m. by Chair Vicki Johnson. 20 0 Agenda Item No. 2, Consider: Approval of Minutes for June 9. 1997 Regular Board Meeting - Anderson stated that in the June 9 minutes, page 15, he did not state that there was a requirement that the Fechtel House be moved by August. He stated that if the house is moved in August, the 24 considered Bob Jones location would not be wise due to lack of security. 25 26 Motion was made to approve the minutes as corrected for June 9, 1997. 27 28 Motion: Goldstein 29 Second: Fierce 30 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Jones, Anderson 31 Nays: None 32 Approved: 7-0 33 34 Agenda Item No. 3. Administrative Comments - Kendall inquired about the counter suit on 35 Brunson delaying construction and Yelverton stated that the construction would not be delayed. 36 Kendall encouraged Lenoir to remember to include Park Board representative Berman when 37 bringing the user groups together and Kendall will bring Tennis and Hockey together for the 38 discussion of Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II construction. 39 40 Fierce inquired about the status with Brad Tribble and Lenoir stated that all the money had not 41 been raised, but everyone is talking and starting to move. Trimble will report back in September 42 in regard to figures and fund raising, but currently funds raised were undetermined. Lenoir • Parks and Recreation Board Minut es,July 14, 1997 Page 1 of 9 • **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** S 1 confirmed that Tribble is interested, but a committee was involved and must be included on the 2 process of the project. 3 4 Kendall inquired about the SPIN summit where they are organizing to do a project with the 5 community and the Parks and Recreation Department. Yelverton stated that no specific project 6 has been decided upon, but a summit will be organized in order to bring key members to the 7 table for project discussion. Yelverton stated that there is no guarantee of a park facility project. 8 The Board will be invited to participate in the summit. 9 10 Johnson inquired about the Parks and Recreation Public Service Announcement (PSA) which is 11 in the works and Lenoir confirmed Wednesday, July 16, 1997 as the production start date. 12 13 Yelverton addressed the Board in regard to the Parks Department and stated that the last two 14 years the City Manager's Office has worked to construct operational items such as policies, 15 procedures, customer service, building programs, new parks, etc. Yelverton stated that the 16 Department must now "take stock" of their position; therefore, an operational review will begin 17 for the Parks and Recreation Department. 18 19 Yelverton introduced the backgrounds of Shelli Seimer, Community Services Coordinator and 20 Project Team Leader; Darcey Imm, Assistant to City Manager; and Lauren Safranek, Human 21 Resources Administrator as the in-house team who will conduct this department operational review. Yelverton stated that her involvement will be solely as support. 03 24 Seimer addressed the Board in regard to the following points in regard to an operational review: 25 26 Reason and Purpose 27 28 /The City's growth has created an increase in Parks and Recreation services and programs offered 29 to the Community 30 ✓ Good management practice to have a team analyze the services and programs offered and to 31 look for ways to continually improve as the growth continues 32 ✓ Help direct the future and growth of the Parks and Recreation Department 33 ✓ Look at ways to improve the Department's overall effectiveness; define strengths and 34 weaknesses 35 ✓ Identify areas for continuous improvement 36 ✓ Develope structures for the future of the Department 37 ✓ Look at staffing and reporting levels 38 39 Goals and Objectives 40 41 ✓ Review operating policies and procedures, how goals and objectives are defined 42 ✓ Review work assignments, work loads • Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 2 of 9 • **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** 1 ✓ Review organizational culture; interview the staff in regard to their attitude toward the 2 Department 3 ✓ Review customer satisfaction surveys 4 ✓ Review needs for more customer input 5 ✓ Create focus groups from some user groups; sports associations 6 ✓ Review organizational structure, reporting relationships 7 ✓ Meet and discuss Department with Park and Youth Park Board 8 ✓ Review communication system; how staff and public knows what is going on in the 9 Department and what programs are available 10 ✓ Analyze Department safety issues (employee, facility and program safety) 11 12 Seimer stated that the philosophy of this study will focus on continuous project improvements; 13 therefore, it makes sense to do this review in-house since this is a continuous process. 14 15 Seimer concluded that the process will proceed as follows: 16 17 ✓ Team will meet with employees in regard to the purpose and goals of the review and the 18 Department mission, goals, objectives, available training, etc. 19 ✓ Department materials reviewed 20 ✓ Develop organizational culture survey 21 ✓ Analyze current customer satisfaction surveys ✓ Meet with Department staff and Board members 23 ✓ Obtain additional customer input through focus groups 24 ✓ Perform benchmark comparisons to other Parks and Recreation Departments 25 ✓ Identify various findings and observations 26 ✓ Identify various opportunities for improvement 27 ✓ Develop recommendations 28 ✓ Establish an implementation plan 29 30 Kendall inquired about the primary user group and Yelverton stated that this review is a 31 management tool to see how the Parks and Recreation Department is doing and stated that the 32 review is applicable to other departments. Yelverton informed the Board that the team hopes to 33 have findings identified by the end of September and confirmed that the implementation plan is 34 the more lengthy process. 35 36 Agenda Item No. 4. Public Forum- Chair Vicki Johnson opened the public forum at 6:57 p.m. 37 There was no comment. Public forum was closed. 38 39 Hamilton enters Board meeting at 6:58 p.m. 40 41 Hamilton stated that she had a correction to the June 9, 1997 minutes. Motion was made to 42 reopen Agenda Item No. 2 for amendment. • Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 3 of 9 0 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** Motion: Jones 2 Second: Beyer 3 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones, Anderson 4 Nays: None 5 Approval: 8-0 6 7 Hamilton stated that her comment on page 6 in regard to the Eagle Scout Project should be 8 clarified to read that she inquired if the church has title to the land and the applicant, Jeff 9 Underwood, verified that the church does have title. Hamilton did not verify. 10 11 Motion was made to amend the previous motion to approve minutes as corrected adding 12 Hamilton's correction for June 9, 1997. 13 14 Motion: Goldstein 15 Second: Jones 16 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones, Anderson 17 Nays: None 18 Approval: 8-0 19 20 Agenda Item No. 5. Consider: Sidewalk and Trail Ordinance - Lenoir encouraged the Park Board 0 to work toward approving this ordinance as it is a good time to begin processing it through P&Z since it is part of the subdivision ordinance. 23 24 Kendall referred to page 5-6, Article 2, Section 2.02, A and a discussion she had with Anderson 25 in regard to this section. The issue is how any new home building in an estate neighborhood 26 would have to put a sidewalk in front of their house. Kendall suggested that these undeveloped 27 lots in existing subdivisions be excluded. The Board considered Yelverton's suggestion of 28 "newly platted subdivision" and an effective date on these subdivisions. Technical verbiage will 29 be up to Greg Last, Director of Community and Economic Development. 30 31 Kendall asked the Board about their thoughts on meandering sidewalks and the Board liked the 32 idea. Lenoir stated that this may be an option as she referred to Article 3, Section 3.01, A under 33 Sidewalk Specifications and agreed to possibly expand the item to refer to this type of sidewalk 34 for aesthetic purposes, not only to allow trees to remain. 35 36 Fierce stated that he liked the idea, but a specific type of application must be included as to when 37 meandering would be an option. Lenoir stated that the Trail System Master Plan encourages 38 meandering sidewalks when possible. Enforcement of such would be in the Construction 39 Standards. The Board suggested the statement of"shall meander where practical". 40 41 Kendall presented an executive summary that Council reviewed at their retreat in regard to a 0 Public Works question referring to the discussion of a "retro fit to existing neighborhoods." Kendall stated that discussion in the future could refer to the idea of the City providing money in Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 4 of 9 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** 1 the budget for established neighborhoods to build sidewalks. Yelverton stated that this 2 discussion would be a budget item and is comparable to the neighborhood sewer program, retro- 3 fitting neighborhoods with sewer when desired. Yelverton stated that the one problem with 4 retro-fitting sidewalks would be not having 100% participation from the neighborhood, which is 5 necessary. 6 7 Fierce referred to construction specifications and stated that other surfaces are applicable and that 8 many other all weather surfaces are available and the ordinance only states concrete. Lenoir 9 stated that the Trail Master Plan refers to concrete due to maintenance. 10 11 The Board requested that page 5-7, Section 3.01, C should indicate "new" when referring to 12 materials or have a global statement that requires all material to be new. Fierce also stated that a 13 specification of rebar elevation be defined before concrete is poured. Lenoir stated that the 14 technical wording will be completed by Ron Harper, Deputy Director/City Engineer and 15 reviewed by attorneys. 16 17 Beyer stated the including of the fact that upgraded materials or alterations be subject to review 18 and approval by P&Z during the application process. Article 3 should state these specifications 19 are "minimal standards" and define a process for applicants to go through for an upgraded 20 sidewalk. Hamilton referred to a typo in Section 1.02, A2 "is" mandatory instead of"in" mandatory. il 23 24 Johnson suggested a definition of the meaning of"residential lead walk" in the ADA Section; 5- 25 8, 3.02, Section A. 26 27 Motion was made to accept the ordinance and construction standards as amended. 28 29 Motion: Kendall 30 Second: Goldstein 31 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones, Anderson 32 Nays: None 33 Approval: 8-0 34 35 Agenda Item No. 6. Consider: Philosophies for Revenue. Sports and Recreation Programs - 36 Upon discussion, the Board agreed to amend the philosophy to read as follows: Recreation 37 Program and Special Event Philosophy-To offer residents a wide variety of lifetime leisure 38 activities including introductory, skill building, family and community centered, educational, 39 social and entertainment opportunities. 40 41 Motion was made to accept the Parks and Recreation Philosophies as amended. Motion: Fierce iiiSecond: Goldstein Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 5 of 9 • • **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** 1 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones, Anderson 2 Nays: None 3 Approval: 8-0 4 5 Agenda Item No. 7, Consider: Procedure for Recreation Program Planning and Revenue - Lenoir 6 informed the Board of the new list of standards added and the corrections amended to Exhibit 7 "F", Post Audit Form: date, class information, number of refunds given and a separation of staff 8 and public comments. 9 10 Motion was made to approve the additions and corrects to the Recreation Program Planning and 11 Review Procedure as presented. 12 13 Motion: Hamilton 14 Second: Beyer 15 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones, Anderson 16 Nays: None 17 Approval: 8-0 18 19 Agenda Item No. 8, Consider: Fee Schedule for FY 1997-98 - Fierce inquired about the building 20 reservation revenue generated and Lenoir informed the Board that the reservation fee revenue 1 generated at year to date as $852. iii 23 Schaeffer and Zonker informed the Board of the difficulty of keeping track of a $3 fee per 24 meeting which was implemented last year due to the complaints about the $25 annual fee of 25 those groups who met only once each year. 26 27 Schaeffer suggested a one time flat fee of$20 and Jones recommended a return to the one time 28 flat fee of$25. Upon discussion, the Board decided on the following annual fee schedule due to 29 users making unlimited reservations at one rate; taking advantage of this one time fee: 30 One time user fee - $10 31 Quarterly to monthly- $25 32 More than once a month - $75 33 34 The Board discussed bringing up the scheduling procedure at the next meeting. 35 36 Motion was made to adopt the altered meeting fee schedule as amended. 37 38 Motion: Hamilton 39 Second: Jones 40 Ayes: Goldstein, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Jones Anderson 41 Nays: None 42 Approval: 8-0 IF Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 6 of 9 • **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** Agenda Item No. 9, Liaison Reports - Youth Parks and Recreation Board - Johnson - Schaeffer 2 stated that the Youth Board discussed liaison opportunities and the promotional video. Johnson 3 stated to add their attendance record to their minutes. Johnson verified that a quorum (four of 4 seven) has always been present and Schaeffer confirmed. 5 6 Fierce inquired about the mascot and Lenoir stated that a graphic artist is working on the image. 7 8 Budget - Fierce - No report. No report due to budget as Agenda Item No. 10, Discuss: Budget 9 FY 1997-98. 10 11 Recreation/Special Events - Johnson, Beyer, Jones - Fall program schedule was enclosed in 12 packet for the Board's information. 13 14 Community Relations - Berman, Kendall - Anderson volunteered for the Bob Jones Park liaison 15 position. 16 17 Youth Sports Associations - Beyer- Beyer questioned whether Debbie Orzech remains as current 18 acting president for the fall. Schaeffer verified Orzech as acting president and stated that a 19 meeting will be organized to resolve inter-association issues. 20 0 Community Groups -Hamilton, Goldstein - Goldstein stated that Bob Jones and Noble Oaks will not be a desired location for the Fechtel House and that the City Manager agrees the house must 23 be on developed park property. Goldstein stated that the house must be moved by September. 24 25 SPIN - Fierce - Fierce stated that SPIN decided on an annual city-wide community activity to 26 bring together leaders of groups within the community to come up with an activity they can all 27 participate in. The group considered an October summit which will not only involve business, 28 but other city leaders. Fierce encouraged the Board to organize issues to discuss with SPIN as 29 SPIN is excited about meeting with the Board in September. Fierce stated that SPIN is looking 30 to fill a SPIN Neighborhood 13 position. 31 32 SPDC- Kendall - Kendall stated that bids have been awarded to James Arnold Construction and 33 construction will begin within 30 days. Kendall stated that the parking lot budget is still too high 34 at $400,000, so the engineer is planning to look at the various surfaces available for a parking lot. 35 Lenoir stated the lot has been planned to consist of 567 spaces. Kendall stated that the budget 36 should be finalized pending these numbers and construction will not be postponed. 37 38 JUC - Hamilton - No report due to no interactive meeting to date. Hamilton stated that she 39 intends to bring up the issue of the lights on Field 1 at the next meeting. 40 41 Johnson inquired about status of the activity room the City paid for at Carroll Middle School. Lenoir stated that the principal needed the room for a class room since the school capacity will increase and they are not adding portable buildings. Lenoir stated that Hawk will submit a letter Parks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 7 of 9 • • 0 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** that this is not a desirable situation. Beyer stated that the room has been used for In School 2 Suspension. Jones stated that this room must remain accessible for City use as intended. Jones 3 stated that it must be available for use after school hours and on weekends without conversion; 4 having staff move items into storage. 5 6 Agenda Item No. 10. Discuss: Budget FY 1997-98 - Lenoir stated that she will be meeting with 7 the City Manager this Thursday, July 17, 1997 to review the first budget proposal. 8 9 Agenda Item No. 11, Discuss: Donations - Southlake Historical Commission - Goldstein stated 10 that there is no available park space for the Fechtel House. Aloha Payne stated that she may have 11 to begin writing the newspapers to encourage a helping hand. Goldstein stated that an article in 12 regard to the plight of finding a location may bring about an interest in providing a location for 13 this house. Johnson stated that it is not that the Board does not want to work with the Historical 14 Commission, but the Board wants to find a safe location and Bob Jones would not be a secure 15 location at this time. Goldstein encouraged a "save the building" article as the develooper plans 16 on moving dirt by September. 17 18 Agenda Item No. 12, Discuss: Joint Meeting with SPIN Standing Committee - Thursday, 19 September 25. 1997 - Board confirmed the meeting date and added the meeting to their calendar. 20 03 Agenda Item No. 13, Discuss: Hockey Court Repairs - Henry inquired to what point does the Board wish to improve the court and suggested that there are various materials for boards such as fiberglass or to continue with wood. The Board discussed the fiberglass material in terms of 24 weather conditions in the South. The Board decided that Henry would meet with the coaches 25 and recommendations and ideas should be submitted to the Board in their next packet. Lenoir 26 agreed and encouraged the use of a professional construction crew. 27 28 Hamilton inquired about moving the next Board meeting to one week ahead, August 4, 1997 and 29 the Board and staff agreed. 30 31 Agenda Item No. 14, Discuss: Park Dedication Evaluation Form for Private Park Credits - 32 Johnson stated that a task force be put together consisting of Berman, Jones and Fierce and to put 33 a form together. The developers up front and let them know what the Board wants in designated 34 areas. 35 36 Lenoir stated per acre value raise of from $500 to $1,000 per house and commercial increases per 37 acre from $500 to $800 as the actual fee. The acreage value has increased from $25,000 to 38 $40,000 per acre. The Board recommended a residential fee of 1 to 20 and P&Z recommended 1 39 to 50 and 1 to 40 was decided upon by City Council which will essentially double the fee. 40 Market value will influence the fee and, in the future, the City will be doing a study to determine 41 the appropriate value of raw acrage. Up to 50% is still available. Also, there will be a process 42 that it is reviewed every three (3) years to justify fees. IIIParks and Recreation Board Minutes,July 14, 1997 Page 8 of 9 • 0 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD** 2 3 Goldstein stated that P&Z encourages the Board to bring about changes, ideas and 4 recommendations on a regular annual basis. 5 6 Being no further business, the meeting was adjourn at 9:30 p.m. 7 8 9 10 11 Gary Beyer, Secretary 12 13 14 15 16 Vicki Johnson, Chair 17 18 S SParks and Recreation Board Minutes,July14, 1997 Page 9of g 9 • • . : . 1997 FALL PROGRAMS SEPTEMBER -DECEMBER PRESCHOOL New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Location Revised Mom & Me Tumbling 4/8 21/2-4 Contractor The Lodge Repeat Ballet & Tap for Tots 4/8 3-6 Contractor The Lodge Repeat Hand in Hand 4/8 21/2-4 Contractor Dove Room A Stepping Stone to Preschool Repeat Snack with Santa for Preschool 12/36 3-6 City CC & Lodge Repeat Computer Fun for Preschool 4/12 3-5 Contractor Future Kids Revised Halloween Spooktacular 12/36 3-6 City CC & Lodge New Turkey Day Bonanza 12/36 3-6 City CC & Lodge • • . . . YOUTH/TEEN New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Locatio n Repeat Basic Horsemanship 6/12 5 & up Contractor Wagon Wheel Ranch Repeat Intermediate Horsemanship 6/12 5 & up Contractor Wagon Wheel Ranch Repeat Supersitter 14/32 11-15 Contractor Community Center Repeat Computer Fun for Youth/Teens 4/12 6-12 Contractor Future Kids Repeat Snack with Santa 12/36 7-12 City CC & Lodge Repeat Halloween Spooktacular 12/36 7-12 City CC & Lodge New Turkey Day Bonanza 12/36 7-12 City CC & Lodge New Stargazing on the Hill 12/24 6-12 City/Contractor Bicentennial Park Hill Repeat After School Breakout 12/60 Durham, Carroll, Rockenbaugh 5-11 City Durham/ Rockenbaugh Revised Saturday Trips for Teens 10/20 11-15 City Will Vary • • • ADULT New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age g 9 Contractor/City Location Repeat Dog Obedience 6/12 16 & up Contractor BP Tennis Courts Repeat Jazzercise 12/100 16 & up Contractor Durham Gym Repeat Regular Ballroom 4/18 16 & up Contractor Durham Cafeteria Repeat Country Western I 4/18 16 & up Contractor Durham Cafeteria Repeat Robinette Academy of Personal 10/50 16 & up Contractor Community Center Protection New Hunters Safety Course 6/25 16 & up Contractor Community Center Revised Successful Money Management 6/18 16 & up Contractor Community Center • • • SENIORS New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Location Repeat Learn to Play Bridge 4/8 Adult Contractor The Lodge Revised Senior Trips 8/30 Adult City Repeat Crafting for Seniors 4/12 Adult Contractor Community Center Repeat Senior Luncheons 4/50 Adult Contractor Community Center Repeat Gentle Exercise 4/12 Adult Volunteer The Lodge SPECIAL EVENTS New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Location Repeat Harvest Fest & Carnival All City Bicentennial Park Repeat Southlake Saturday Nite 150/350 9-14 _ CMS Repeat Masterworks 2-75 All City/Contractor Community Center Repeat Holiday in the Park All City Bicentennial Park New Breakfast with Santa 12-200 0-12 City Durham Elementary New Family Campout at 8-20 All City Bicentennial Park Adventure Alley S • • H . CISD/CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION COURSES New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Location Repeat Beginning WordPerfect 10/18 16 & up CISD CHS Repeat Intermediate WordPerfect 10/18 16 & up CISD CHS Revised Intro to Windows 95 10/18 16 & up CISD CHS Repeat Intro to Microsoft Word 10/18 16 & up CISD _ CHS Revised Intro to Excel 10/18 16 & up CISD CHS New How to Handle Your Difficult 10/18 Adult CISD Teenager Durham Repeat Preparing your Preschooler 10/18 Adult CISD Durham • • . . . ATHLETICS New/Repeat Name of Program Min/Max Target Age Contractor/City Location Repeat In-Line Hockey League 6-14 City CIS Repeat NFL Gatorade Punt Pass & Kick 8-16 City CIS Repeat Youth Basketball League 6-14 City CMS, CIS, Durham Revised Little Dribblers 4-5 City Rockenbaugh Repeat Flag Football for Youth 6-14 City Durham & BP Repeat Flag Football for Adults 16 & up City Durham & BP Repeat Beginning Golf 12 & up Contractor Southwest Golf Repeat Intermediate Golf 12 & up Contractor Southwest Golf Revised Youth Tennis League 2/12 _ 4-18 Contractor BP Revised Adult Tennis League 2/12 4-18 Contractor BP Repeat Over 35 Softball League 16 & up City BP Repeat Coed Softball League 16 & up City BP Repeat Adult Basketball League 16 & up City BP Total: 55 programs 7 new programs Overall: 13% new programs PROPOSED 7/14/97 by the Parks and Recreation Board • Fees Schedule for Parks Activities Effective October 1, 1997 Activity Fee 1. Building Reservations for Residents: Security and Clean-up Deposit $100.00 (refundable) Regular Meeting Fee per year: per Meeting $3.00/meeting 1 meeting $10.00 Quarterly to Monthly Scheduled Meetings $25.00 More than Monthly Meetings Scheduled $75.00 Week day meeting $10.00/hr 2. Building Reservations for Special Activities: Security and Clean-up Deposit $100.00 (refundable) The Lodge (with Kitchen) $15.00/hr Community Center/room $15.00/rm/hr Community Center/entire bldg $35.00/hr 3. Organized Athletic Programs $1,000,000.00 General Liability Insurance Policy 4. TV/VCR Rental Fee No charge with reservation 5. Equipment Rentals: (Driver's license held) • Tennis Racket&Balls No charge Volleyballs No charge Basketballs No charge 6. Reservations of Park Facilities: Security and Clean-up Deposit(group of 100 or more require) $50.00 (refundable) Hilltop Picnic Area $5.00/4 hrs Pine Tree Picnic Area $5.00/4 hrs Bicentennial Pavilion $8.00/4 hrs 7. Reservations for Fields and Courts: Ballfields (No Lights) $15.00/1.5 hr/ field Ballfields (With Lights) $20.00/1.5 hr/field Soccer Fields $15.00/1.5 hr/ field Field Preparation Fees: Weekday Games $25.00/field Weekend Games $37.50/field Multi-use Court (Hockey/Basketball) $15.00/1.5 hr Multi-use Court (with lights) $20.00/1.5 hr Sand Volleyball Courts $15.00/1.5hr/court Tennis Courts $5.00/1.5 hr/court • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES OF: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Joint SPIN/Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, July 24, 1997 City Council Chamber Representatives Present: David Baltimore (#12), Chair; Joe Mast (#3), Secretary; Martin Schelling (#2), Jan Francis (#5), Tom Ward (#6), Darrell Faglie (#7), Michael Boutee for Laura Miklosko (#9), Doug McKelvey (#14), Wayne Haney (#15), John Wilder (#16) Representatives Absent: Cara White (#1), Janet Murphy (#4), Pattie Minder (#8), Al Morin (#10), Roger Hutton (#11), Katie Holzgraefe, Youth Delegate Planning & Zoning Commission Members Present: Joe Wright, James Murphy, Ann Creighton, Rob Jones, Debra Edmondson, Lanny Tate, L.C. LeVrier Staff Present: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Greg Last, Director of • Community Development; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager; Nona Whitehead, SPIN Coordinator David Baltimore called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. SPIN Chairman David Baltimore had each member of the respective groups introduce themselves. Mr. Baltimore thanked Planning and Zoning Chairman Joe Wright for placing this meeting in their busy schedules. Agenda Item No. 2, City Manager's Report Curtis Hawk was unable to be present and the City Manager's Report was given by Shana Yelverton. Mrs. Yelverton mentioned that in relation to the Westlake situation, Southlake has extended a settlement offer to Westlake. Mrs. Yelverton said that Southlake has made the offer because the Judge would like to see this case settled and this agreement makes it possible for Westlake to remain a town. There is a copy of the proposed settlement offer at the City Manager's office. Shana Yelverton also mentioned that there are three opportunities to get information about the proposed reinvestment zone next week. Staff is currently meeting with the various taxing entities in regard to their interest in participating in the TIF. Debra • Edmondson asked for fact sheets and a copy of the TIF legislation. SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 1 of 6 S Mrs. Yelverton reported that the Charter review committee of council members has sent a list of items for consideration to the lawyers for review. It will be returned to the committee for further review and eventual citizen input. Mrs. Yelverton reported that the City Council has approved a contract to move forward with a strategic plan which will help create a vision for the community. She indicated that SPIN will probably be asked to participate in the strategic planning is some manner. The current committee is composed of Mayor Stacy, Ralph Evans and David Harris. Agenda Item #3, Discussion of Items Related to Planning & Zoning Chairman Wright said that the Planning & Zoning Commission welcomed the opportunity to meet with SPIN. Ann Creighton said that she felt that it will be helpful to have this opportunity for SPIN Reps to bring their neighborhood concerns to the attention of P&Z. John Wilder mentioned that in SPIN #16 the role of SPIN has been to help the neighborhood find alternate options that will be acceptable to everyone. Joe Wright said that Wayne Haney has worked hard and how P&Z needs people like Wayne to come forward to speak positively in regard to issues and that the Church of Christ/SPIN meetings were very helpful to the Planning & Zoning process. • Chairman Wright asked to hear from SPIN on the positive issues as well as negative concerns. Mr. Wright reminded the group that SPIN is not really a part of the legislative process. Tom Ward said he felt that rezoning cases should be encouraged by P&Z to meet with effected neighborhoods prior to bringing their cases forward. Shana Yelverton added some input explaining that developers are encouraged to hold SPIN meetings and that there is a step by step process outlined for initiating those meetings. Jim Murphy shared how some recent development cases have worked through various issues as neighbors prior to coming to P&Z. Ann Creighton mentioned that some homeowners have complained that they have not been notified and that room for improvement might include making SPIN Reps more aware of the yellow zoning change signs so they in turn can double check to make sure that homeowners are notified. David Baltimore responded by saying that notification is not a formal process in place and that SPIN can not guarantee every homeowner affected will be notified. He suggested that instead of notifying the specific Neighborhood SPIN Rep that instead, Community Development should consider sending all zoning change announcements to Nona and she could copy the information and distribute to all SPIN Reps because often these changes affect more than one SPIN Neighborhood. Mr. Baltimore indicated that the registered letters often get sent back to the postoffice and that he would rather find • the information in his packet. SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 2 of 6 • Joe Wright indicated that the neighborhood meetings he has experienced were not being well attended. Darrell Faglie agreed that it usually takes a hot topic to draw people out for a meeting. Debra Edmondson mentioned that is becoming difficult to get individuals to P&Z meetings as well, unless it directly affects their property. F.C. LeVrier said that it would be helpful to P&Z if SPIN would help educate residents that are coming forward with concerns. Citizens need to be aware that there has to be a legal reason to not support the development in question. He asked SPIN to give P&Z "something to hang our hats on legally." Mr. LeVrier said that requests can not be denied just because folks do not like the project. There are site plans and platting. If the developer meets the criteria for the platting and the site plan, there is not a lot that can be done. Mr. LeVrier said that during zoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission has discretion. Zoning changes can be denied on the basis of popular opinion, provided these opinions reflect concerns of health, safety, or welfare issues. Debra Edmondson said that all P&Z can do is recommend something. It may be no, or it may be yes, or it may be passing an ordinance against what the attorneys advise. But whatever P&Z does, it doesn't have the force of law. The Council is really the group who can enforce. They (City Council) are "where the rubber meets the road" and they are the ones who, when they vote, and someone decides to take the City to court, they are the ones who are accountable. P&Z is just a recommending body. Joe Wright said that it is true that they are a recommending body. However, P&Z can approve a final • plat. Also, if a denial is recommended on zoning, it takes a super majority to override at City Council. Thus, P&Z does have responsibility for ensuring that decisions are made within state law. John Wilder said that a document with guidelines for granting a zoning change might be helpful to educate SPIN Reps. Jim Murphy said that the Land Use Plan is the set of guidelines that P&Z uses for making decision. Joe Wright said the Land Use Plan is indeed guidelines, not rules. Rob Jones added that the Corridor Plan Overlay would also be used as a guideline. There was interest expressed in having a set of zoning ordinances available for SPIN Reps. Joe Wright requested that SPIN Representatives come to staff or to P&Z to get their facts straight before they host a meeting. Citizens are often irate but do not have their facts straight. Mr. Wright used as an example the letter that was written to the Dallas Morning News that mentioned his name and Martin Schelling, which did not have correct information. He also wanted SPIN to be aware that all ordinances have to be considered. Citizens tend to zero in on one issue, but that P&Z must look at all the ordinances and fit everything together. Ann Creighton mentioned that it might be wise for SPIN Reps to look at issues like the Chevron station controversy and to let their constituents know that issues discussed at SPIN meetings are not binding or legal if a written form was not given. The service station issue is a good example that it was not • binding to just have an item discussed. SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 3 of 6 • Tom Ward asked about off premise liquor sales being discretionary. Joe Wright responded that most of those issues are determined by state law. The formula can not be more restrictive than state law. F.C. LeVrier mentioned that P&Z and City Council listen carefully to organized opposition that is based on facts or law. Rob Jones said that pictures are helpful in documenting needs. Ann Creighton said that the number of people present at meetings bear more weight than just a sheet with signatures. Effective citizen input is when there is a good turn out. Greg Last said the Land Use Plan (LUP) update might begin in August. There has been a lot of work on the ordinances. From an involvement standpoint this will be a public meeting explaining the LUP and taking public comment from whoever is present. The staff will collate the feedback for P&Z and start the first meeting in a work session format. There will be a wide variety of vehicles for public input as the city is broken down into bite sized pieces to be looked at. Staff will also be recommending areas that they are aware of for special study. The staff will make SPIN and the media aware of each area undergoing study. Mr. Last estimated that the update will take several months. Greg Last also brought updates on several ordinances: Tree preservation is being worked on by members of KSB, an arborist, developers, staff and council members. Progress is being made and a recommendation is expected in August or September. • Ordinance 480-Y on Assisted Living was passed by City Council in July. The ordinance is still being adjusted as a legal issue related to spouses is still outstanding. A service station ordinance has been approved by P&Z and will be considered by City Council in August. Variables still being considered include aesthetics, lot lines and exits. A sidewalk ordinance proposed by the Park Board is being revisited by Engineering. It is proposed that the City require developers to build sidewalks that compliment and facilitate the Trail Master Plan. Joe Wright indicated that he does not believe a sidewalk ordinance will be popular with Southlake citizens. Mr. Last also explained the Agenda Management Point System. This system has helped to give a better estimate of when items are expected to be on the agenda. He also mentioned that the development activity list changes hourly. Mr. Last indicated that SPIN should feel free to check with his staff on the status of specific items. Agenda Item #4, Neighborhood Reports SPIN #1 - Absent • SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 4 of 6 SPIN #2 - Martin Schelling reported that waterline construction is expected to begin on • North White Chapel. SPIN #3 - Joe Mast said Lonesome Dove is putting in their last street. He said that SPIN #3 is close to build-out and there has not been much activity. SPIN #4 - No Report SPIN #5 - Jan Francis said that there is a group opposing the TIF and that it is not a SPIN effort. It appears that this group does not have accurate information about the TIF. This same group also sent a lot of mailings in regard to Timarron Commercial. Jan wanted to let the committee know that it was not a SPIN mailing. SPIN #6 - Tom Ward mentioned that the Gun Barrel store is an example of how residential housing needs to be shielded from commercial development. He requested that any future approval of retail should be far removed or buffered from residential. SPIN #7 - Darrell Faglie has some problems related to the proposed school across from his neighborhood. Joe Wright said that the residents requests to P&Z and City Council made the requirements so difficult that the developer could not make a residential development cost effective and now the neighborhood is stuck with a school. The initial request had been for 63 lots and it was pushed back to 55 which did not work. S Mr. Wright said it is necessary for P&Z and SPIN to work together to be sure they are not too restrictive, because the schools can do whatever they want. SPIN #8 - Absent SPIN #9 - Michael Boutee reported for Laura Miklosko that there is a lot of building going on the north side of Byron Nelson near the school. There is some concern that Byron Nelson will become a short cut and residents will be watching the traffic. SPIN #10 - Absent SPIN #11 - Absent SPIN #12 - David Baltimore said that his neighborhood could have had an assisted living center, but now it is going to have a gas station. SPIN #13 - Vacant SPIN #14 - Doug McKelvey said that the development on Continental and White Chapel is going on and most residents are in favor of the residential development as versus a commercial development. • SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 5 of 6 • SPIN #15 - Wayne Haney said the SPIN #15 is getting busy. The Church of Christ expansion project is nearly over. Southlake Woods development is coming along as well as Timber Lakes which was pulled from the P&Z process until they decide if they can purchase more land. There is still concern about the trash in the creek. Mr. Haney mentioned the headwaters of Jellico creek,and asked that P&Z be careful about development on that creek. His neighborhood is also trying to get a mail drop in the Southlake Marketplace. Joe Wright suggested that Martin Schelling might be able to help with that request. SPIN #16 - John Wilder said that the water tank far exceeded his expectations and that residents seem pleased. Greg Last said that irrigation and landscaping is coming subject to budgetary restrictions. Hearing no further business Joe Wright motioned to adjourn the meeting. It was seconded by Martin Schelling and the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. • • SPIN/Joint Planning & Zoning Meeting, July 24, 1997 Page 6 of 6 City of Southlake,Texas rJ MEMORANDUM J ' JUL 3 O a, l July 30, 1997 CT. TO: Curtis E. Hawk. City Manager FROM: Ron Harper. City Engineer SUBJECT: CIP Status Report Attached are the status reports currently included in the City's Capital Improvement Program for 1996-1998. These monthly reports are in a narrative format which will describe the ongoing progress of each project. A graphical schedule of each project is also included which shows the current schedule with it's corresponding baseline schedule These narrative and graphical updates will include the following: 1996-1998 Water and Sewer CIP Projects 1996-1997 Roadway CIP Projects 1997-1998 Road and Drainage CIP Projects RH/ 6 Attachments I ' City of Southlake,Texas MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE August 1997 1996-98 Water and Sewer CIP Project Description: Shady Lane.'Raintree .-I ddition Sewer, Water and Road Improvements Discussion: The design of the sanitary sewer. water line and road improvements are complete and the construction plans have been reviewed and approved. The city is currently in the process of obtaining. the necessary easements for the construction of the sewer. While these easements are being negotiated, other design alternatives are being explored in order to limit the number of easements so construction can commence. If the design alternatives to the sewer are not cost feasible, the city anticipates acquiring these easements by the end of August. The bid advertisement and finalization of the contract for the sewer should be complete by mid-October with construction beeinning shortly thereafter. The construction of the sanitary sewer should take up to three months. Once the sanitary sewer is installed, construction of the water lines will begin. The construction of the streets will proceed following the completion of the water lines. Project Description: Huntwick Sanitary SewerAbandonment of Lift Station at Carroll and Dove Discussion: The design of the sanitary sewer has been complete. The plans have been reviewed but not yet approved. The city is currently negotiating with four homeowners in order to obtain utility easements. The preliminary discussions with three of the four homeowners has been positive but extensive. The city hopes to have these easements by the end of August. The condemnation process has begun for the fourth homeowner. An appraisal has been ordered and should be received within a the next week. The remainder of the condemnation process may take up to 60 days. Once these easement issues have been resolved, the city anticipates that the advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take 40 days. Construction of these improvements will last approximately 90 days. Project Description: Diamond Circle Estates Sanitary Seaver/Road Improvements Discussion: The construction plans have been completed and approved. The city has acquired all the necessary easements to construct this project. The project is currently being advertised for bids and the bid opening is scheduled for August 14. The project is scheduled to be awarded on August 19 with construction to begin in mid-September. Construction is anticipated to last for at least 180 days, which will place the completion date at mid-May, 1998. Project Description: Mission Hill Estates Sanitary Sewer Improvements I City of Southlake, Texas Discussion: The construction plans have been completed and reviewed. The layout of the sanitary sewer has been changed in order to `bypass" six homeowners which refuse to grant an easement. With this alignment change, only one easement will be required and it should be obtained by the end of August. The advertising, bidding, and award of a contract will take around 40 days. Construction is anticipated to last for at least 120 days. This will place the anticipated construction date at mid-April, 1998. Project Description: Dove Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements Discussion: The design of this project is around 60% complete. Review and approval of these plans will take 30 days. Approval was recently received from TU Electric in order for the proposed force main along Dove Road to be located within their existing easement along the north side of Dove Road. Other easements must be acquired. Once these easements have been acquired, the advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 40 days. Construction is anticipated to take 120 days. The expected completion date is August, 1998. Project Description: Dove to Kirkwood Blvd. 12" Water Line Discussion: The design of this water line has been complete. The plans have been reviewed • and approved by the city. The easement description for which this water line will be placed has been reviewed and approved by the Engineer which represents Maguire Thomas Partners. The easement agreement is still being negotiated between the attorneys. This easement is located in what will eventually be the right-of-way of the future Kirkwood Blvd. extension. The city anticipates that this easement will be acquired by mid-August. Advertising, bidding, and award of contract is estimated to take around 40 days. Construction will take at least 120 days. The completion date is expected to be at the end of March, 1998. Project Description: Continental/Kimball 12" Water Line Discussion: The design has been completed for this project. The plans are currently being reviewed by the city. The city is in the process of obtaining the required easements for the construction of this water line. The city foresees these easements being acquired by the end of September. Once the easements have been acquired, the advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 40 days. Construction is anticipated to take 180 days. By the end of October, 1998, the water line should be constructed. Project Description: A'Iiron Elevated Tank Discussion: The design of this project is 60°'0 complete. Once the design is complete, the city will require at least 50 days to review and approve the construction plans. The advertising, Ili L4 —()) City of Southlake,Texas bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 270 days. Project Description: Crossroads Square Sanitary Sewer Discussion: Due to the de%eloper of the Shady Oaks Retail Center participating with the city. 75°0 of this line will be constructed separately. Construction has begun for this portion of the sewer line and will be completed by mid-August. The design for the remainder of this line that collects the sewer from the existing lift station has not yet begun. The design is scheduled to start in mid-August. The design will take at least 30 days with the city needing an additional 10 days to review the plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 15 days, which places the completion date at the end of December. Project Description: 20" Water Line from Ground Storage Tank No. 2 to Dove Road Discussion: The alignment of this water line was revised in order to bypass Corps of Engineers I property. These changes are being made and should be submitted to the city for review within the next couple of weeks. The city is very close in obtaining the required easements for the construction of this water line. The city foresees these easements being acquired by mid-August. Once the easements have been acquired, the advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 40 days. Construction is anticipated to take 180 days. The expected completion date is the end of July, 1998. Project Description: Ground Storage Tank No. 2 Discussion: The design of this project is currently 70% complete. The tank itself was recently bid on and a contract will be awarded on August 5. Construction of the tank will begin at the end of August. Once the remainder of the design is complete, the city will require at least 50 days to review and approve the construction plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction for the entire project is anticipated to take at least 210 days. Project Description: Sutton Place Sanitary Sewer (CDBG) Discussion: The construction plans have been designed and approved by the city. All the necessary easements have been obtained as well. This project is scheduled to be bid on July 30. The contract will be awarded by the end of August and construction shall begin in mid- September. At least 60 days will be required to install the sewer line. 1 City of Southlake, Texas Project Description: 24" Transmission Water Line from Trophy Club to Ground Storage Tank .\i'o. 2 i Discussion: The design of this project is 50% complete. Discussions with the property owners in which an easement is required have taken place with a positive outlook. These easement descriptions are currently being produced. The city hopes to have obtained these easements by the end of September. An interlocal agreement between the City of Southlake and Trophy Club is currently being drafted. Once the design is complete. the city will require at least 50 days to review and approve the construction plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 240 days. The expected completion date is the beginning ofJanuary of 1999. Project Description: Dove Estates Lift Station &Sanitary Sewer Improvements Discussion: This project will require at least 90 days to be designed. No improvements to this project can occur until the lift station at Carroll and Dove is abandoned and improvements to the lift station at Lonesome Dove and Dove occur. The review and approval of the construction plans will take up to 30 days. The necessary easements required for the construction will take at least 120 days to acquire. Construction of this project will take 90 days to complete. • Project Description: Sanitary Sewer/Water Line Improvements for the Miron Addition Discussion: Construction has begun on this project. Construction is anticipated to last at least 90 days. The anticipated completion date is the beginning of November. Project Description: Sanitary Sewer Improvements for Jellico Estates, Dove Estates, & Hillwood Estates Discussion: The design of these projects is 50% complete. Once the design is complete, the city will require at least 50 days to review and approve the construction plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 210 days. Project Description: Sanitary Sewer Improvements for Cross Timbers Discussion: The design of these projects is 10% complete. Once the design is complete, the city will require at least 40 days to review and approve the construction plans. Obtaining the required easements is anticipated to take 120 days. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 240 days. City of Southlake,Texas Project Description: Sanitary Sewer Line Improvements along N. Peytonville Discussion: The construction of this project was recently completed. The sewer line will be put in service within the next week. i i i . . . I 1 1 i WATER & SEOR PROJECTS ---- 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration OctNovbecJani e Mar pr a un Jul ug 'e Octhlo4DecJanT a 1Mar1AprMa Pun JullluthSe 1044ecJani e [Mara unit!'• ..e 1 Sutton Place Sewer(CDBG) 225d 2 Design 60d .&\ .moo 00% 3 Review Plans 21d 4 - Obtain Right of Way 60d 0096 ism., ..,,, , 5 Finalize Plans 10d w 6 - Advertise 28d a\notn 7 - Council Bid Award 1d ♦8/14 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 9 Preconstruction Conference 1d , _ /.;!.n _—_ 10 Construction 60d 0% -r--- 11 ---J 12 24"Transmission Water Line 494d 13 Design 120d - - . .------:---- - - i — - 14 Review Plans 21d 15 Obtain Right of Way 90d 0% - — 16 Finalize Plans 10d .„ 17 Advertise 28d NMIIMI 18 Council Bid Award 1d /27 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ti 20 Preconstruction Conference 1d +')t 8 21 Construction 240d >::.x*>:•>• „ :•s;.*> ;, 0% 22 ------ Page 1 7/26i97 --. WATER & SE1 PROJECTS • __ .. 1997 1998 I 1999 ID Task Name Duration Oct�eecJan f ME a un Jul •u., act rieecJan a lMarlr�vla Jun Jul u�Se 1Octi\14e4Janle 1Mai1AprWalJun Jul •u...= 23 Miron Sewer&Water 213d 24 Design 45d • 0096 25 Review Plans 21d r OD% —. — .. -- 26 Obtain Right of Way 30d 7ii41 27 Finalize Plans 10d 0096 — 28 Advertise 14d 0 CO% 29 Council Bid Award 1d 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15d Z6-: --— ---- 31 Preconstruction Conference 1d 32 Construction 90d 33..v.... 34 HIllwood,Dove Acres,Jellico 375d M — - —• __— ._- "V 36 Design 30d 36 Review Plans 21d 37 Obtain Right of Way 90d _T-- -. k 38 Finalize Plans 10d D%----- 39 Advertise 28d • 40 Council Bid Award 1d 7 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d . . 9 43 Construction 210d a.•.a 44 Page 2 7/28/97 • WATER & SE1 PROJECTS 410 _ 1997 1998 1 1999 ID Task Name - Duration Oct NoNADecJan a Mar Apr Ma un Jul ug a Oct oviDecJanl a IIvfarJApr a un Jul ugSe 1041oPecJan1 e_IMar�A r a un JulllkugSe 45 Cross Timbers Sewer 480d 46 Design 120d ;0% 0% -- 47 Review Plans 30d r 48 Obtain Right of Way 150d 1?%z#:'sv � :•^y•ftu 49 Finalize Plans 45d Pree/a ti 50 Advertise 28d 51 Council Bid Award 1d ♦ /10 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 53 Preconstruction Conference 1d ♦ /1 — — Pik —— • 54 Construction 240d " 0% 55 — — — 1 56 Dove Estates Sewer 293d • 67 Design 45d I,6 58 Review Plans 21d ibli:::.:`l • 1211 59 Obtain Right of Way 120d :.;:..:.. :.;:::z«•;::>::»>a::..::: • 1111111111111111119111111111111 60 Finalize Plans 10d w 61 Advertise 21d s>CM •. 1 62 Council Bid Award 1d V 18 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15d © ry 64 Preconstruction Conference 1d ♦1 65 Construction 90d ........«:> ::>-::A.i:;:0,,,, tki' ' Page 3 703/97 10 WATER & SE. PROJECTS . e______I 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration Oct No OecJan e MarAprMayJunlJultAugi.SeplOct)goviDecJani e iMarrAprwla Jun[Jul uge lOctiloviDecJanl a 1Mar1Apr a Ep®zm 67 N.Peytonvllle Sewer 116d gpilIMMENIIIMIt 68 Design 30d 00% 69 Review Plans 10d 00% 70 Obtain Right of Way Od /14 71 Finalize Plans 5d 00% 72 Advertise 9d 00% 73 Council Bid Award 1d 1 74 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 00% 76 Preconstruction Conference 1d • 4 76 Construction 30d 100% 1 0 1 Page 4 703E17 WATER ANDS R PROJECTS • • _ 1997 _ 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration AugiSe C)ctNovoecJan a Mar pr a un{Jul lAu -e IOct'bvbec lanI a ar pr Aa IJun.Jul1Au_giSe 104JorDecJan! e NarlA�r a,EffJul 1 Shady Lane WaterlSewerlRoads 489d 2 Design 75d 3 Review Plans 21d aag 0o% 4 Obtain Right of Way 129d i 6 Finalize Plans 10d 6 Advertise 28d — 7WITk 7 Council Bid Award 1d .40/9 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 9 Preconstruction Conference 1d .- 0131 10 Construction 210d "':.''.v...::—::::f•;..... .... •.;:•• 0„A, 11 _, 12 Huntwtck Sewer 283d 13 Design 60d - ----- 14 Review Plans 15d ® oo 15 Obtain Right of Way 120d ,6 _ I 16 Finalize Plans 10d 6- 17 Advertise 28d EMI ..s: r�ti 18 Council Bid Award 1d 0 l24 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15dYr) 20 Preconstruction Conference 1d < 0/16 21 Construction 90d s>::>K<::::QoA 22 • —— Page 1 7/28/97 0 1111 WATER AND S*R PROJECTS - 1997 1998 1999 10 Task Name Duration Aur, Oct rE f Mar . .r a MM.u., e Oct ovbe Jan a pr Jun1JullAugSe IOctiNoPegJan e IMailAprPaMEj Jul 23 Diamond Sewer/Roads 422d 24 Design 75d 0096 --- s������u����u 25 Review Plans 21d ' 26 Obtain Right of Way 45d a 1 1 Utilb 27 Finalize Plans 10d to 100% 28 Advertise 18d ® 0 29 Council Bid Award 1d •72\, ♦ /19 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15d El ''6 31 Preconstruction Conference 1d s/tp 32 Construction 180d ::::: :::>::::::;:::::„:::::<:::::<^:::::>:::i:::Ez +::;{<:;:'0% 33--- 34 Mission Hills Sewer 399d ij 35 Design 75d I>V96 • 36 Review Plans 21 d 0 37 Obtain Right of Way 78d IIIMIN110. A, 38 Finalize Plans 10d 1U096 39 Advertise 28d 40 Council Bid Award 1 d Q *II:9) 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0/310 Q 43 Construction 120d \����� � \ 0yk Page 2 7/28/97 • WATER AND S•ER PROJECTS 1997 il_ 1998 1999 ID Task Name _ Duration AuglSe OctNovOecJanT e TMar1Apr�Na un JulIAug�Se rct Vo4De Jane e ar prkv1aJJun1Jul jAugiSe IOc-4'4ec1Janl e_IMar • .r a, un® 45 Dove Road Sewer 435d 46 Design 180d :li% I 47 Review Plans 21d :;: i ti r 48 Obtain Right of Way 90d viu ® :i3:••::::::>iz•.::::;:#:::::•••:, • 49 Finalize Plans 10d *is 0„ -- 0 60 Advertise 28d \71 1 61 Council Bid Award 1d - 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ITJ 53 Preconstruction Conference 1d , 54 Construction 120d r 55 — — - — i 66 Dove to Kirkvvood Water 385d - — — - -- - 67 Design e3d 00% 58 Review Plans 21d "il 0096 59 Obtain Right of Way 180d N. Nk������������ - % 60 Finalize Plans 10d 1UH6 61 Advertise 28d lia14641,125 . 62 Council Bid Award 1d 0 63 Obtain Contrail Documents 15d • MI 64 Preconstruction Conference 1 d ) 10/17 I 65 Construction 120d 096 66 • Page 3 7/28/97 • WATER AND 34111VR PROJECTS e_ .._ 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration Au.,MOct oviDecJan e Mar A.r a ESEM10,..e Oct o secJan e ilsrAprK-PunlJul ugiSe lOctoviDec[JanL e iMarkk_ErjkAaiJunfJul. 67 Continental/Kimball Water 475d 68 Design 130d OCi% 69 Review Plans 21d li,../0 . . .._ 70 Obtain Right of Way 120d I..: ..::::.:!*i:::i:::mi:mi::*i:I::::::::: A) 41%,\'w v3m.1161111 71 Finalize Plans 10d . 13 72 Advertise 28d 73 Council Bid Award 1d s , /21 74 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 75 Preconstruction Conference 1d • , .0 12 • 76 Construction 180d 77 -- - 78 Mlron Elevated Tank 516d :- . 1 . — 79 Design 150d ,‘„,t.......a„, ,;... ,s, ., . 80 Review Plans 30d i iw.tez . 81 Obtain Right of Way Od i -mi li 82 Finalize Plans 21d Map. S Eli _ 83 Advertise 28d ! ism ,v. _ 84 Council Bid Award 1d 1 .42/7k 0 86 Obtain Contract Documents 15d fri 86 Preconstruction Conference ld • .1229 C) 87 Construction 270d 88 . . Page 4 7/28/97 0 WATER AND SR PROJECTS - 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration AugSe OctNoADecJan e MarAprwta Jun Jul AugSe JOctiNov)De Jan e ar•pr a 1Jun IJulIAug[Se IOcl'lovjDe Janj ell‘ltar prrAai.lunlJul 89 Crossroads Square Sewer 100d 90 Design 30d r A , 91 Review Plans 7d 0 92 Obtain Right of Way Od 93 Finalize Plans 3d I.k 8 94 Advertise 28d i:x:::: . k 95 Council Bid Award 1d 1/20 I — 96 Obtain Contract Documents 15d a,� A 97 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0 42/12 98 Construction 15d l 0% M 99 _ r 100 20"Ground Storage 2 to Dove 396d 1 101 Design 120d — aa\ . tti 102 Review Plans 30d HI 0096 alai 103 Obtain Right of Way 30d 104 Finalize Plans 21d `` . _ _. - - . . - .. . Ir tm"1 . . - ._ -_. 106 Advertise 28d • <:::::: ________ 106 Council Bid Award 1d tjr024 •. 107 Obtain Contract Documents 15d r 108 Preconstruction Conference 1 d 1/17 — _.- _ 109 Construction 180d • -----� • 110 — - - Page 5 7/213/97 J 0 WATER AND SOR PROJECTS • 1997 1998 1999 T ID Task Name Duration Aug(Se Oct o ecJan e ar pr a un Jul ug a ar pr AalJun1JullAtAlSe 104JovOe Jani eJN1ar. :r a, un® 111 Ground Storage 2 455d 112 Design 150d , . . '0% 113 Review Plans 30d ram l 114 Obtain Right of Way Od _ - - --- 115 Finalize Plans 20d sea r 116 Advertise 28d iall>ii1 117 Council Bid Award 1 d -- --- o. 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15dWY 1% 119 Preconstruction Conference 1 d rb — o 120 Construction 210d --L f 1 C Page 6 7/28r97 • WATER AND SE- R PROJECTS • Critical Baseline Milestone Rolled Up Task Critical Progress 111.11111.11111 Milestone . Rolled l 1p 1 ask Progress Project: Task "'`'"`'``""``'"`''`"''```"''' Summary WIIIIIIIPI Rolled lll,Baseline Date: 7/28/97 Task Progress IIII. Rolled Up Critical a--- - -J Rolled Up Baseline Milestone Baseline j :--,-—— -----I Rolled Up Critical Progress IIIIMMIIMMIIIMII Rolled Ulu Milestone • Page 7 7/28/97 • City of Southlake, Texas 111 MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE August 1997 1996-97 Roadway CIP Projects Project Description: Dove Road from Shady Lane to Kirkwood Branch Creek Discussion: This project was bid on Jule lb. The contract is scheduled to be awarded on August 5. Construction is anticipated to begin by the end of August. The construction of this project should take up to four months. Project Description: Highland Road from Shady Lane to White Chapel Discussion: The design of this project has been complete. The plans have been reviewed and approved by the city. The city is currently negotiating with two residents to acquire right-of-way in order to align W. Highland with E. Highland at White Chapel. These discussions with these residents have taken longer than anticipated. The city hopes to have acquired this right-of-way by the end of September. Once the required right-of-way has been obtained, the advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take approximately 45 days. Construction is anticipated to last for 180 days. Project Description: Timarron Street Rehab Discussion: This project was bid on June 20. Due to concerns of the City Council regarding the cost of the project, staff has put together a phasing program for this project. The attorneys are currently examining the contract documents to determine if this project must be re-bid if it is phased out. If this project is not re-bid, the first phase is planned to be awarded on August 5 or 19. Construction will then begin at the beginning of September. Project Description: Ridgecrest Road Discussion: The design of this project is 95% complete. Discussions are still taking place regarding drainage improvements along Ridgecrest. Easements for drainage need to be obtained from the downstream property owner. Once the design is complete, the city will need 30 days to review and approve these construction plans. The easements hopefully will be obtained by the end of September. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 90 days, which will place the completion date at the beginning of April, 1998. i ` Project Description: Continental Blvd.from Davis to White Chapel ID I 1 — ! 2 City of Southlake,Texas Discussion: The design is in its beginning stages and should be complete by the end of August. The city will need 30 days to review and approve these construction plans. Obtaining the required easements will take approximately 45 days. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 180 days. This will place the expected completion date at the beginning of September, 1998. Project Description: Burnet' to Cul-de-sac I Discussion: The design of this project has recently began. This project should be designed by the end of August. The city will require 20 days to review and approve the plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 90 days. The anticipated completion date is the end of March, 1998. S .. till 4- 1c\ • 1996 - 1997 R. PROJECTS 1997 1998 - ID Task Name Duration prim act Nov Dec Jan Feb IMarJAr1May JuniJu!Au91Sep1Oct]NoviDec Jan1Feb1Mar[AprIMaylJun1Jul !AugISepEOct1Nov 1 Dove(Shady to Creek) 322d 2 Design 65d 3 Review Plans 21d 4 Obtain Right of Way Od 6 Finalize Plans 6das isri„ . 6 Advertise 13d r 7 Council Bid Award 1d <s> 5 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 9 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0 :t27 10 Construction 90d ..........................a's:0% — - 11 12 Highland(Shady-INC) 481d 13 Design 65d O \ N 14 Review Plans 21d oogle • 15 Obtain Right of Way 150d 16 Finalize Plans 6d or„ 17 Advertise 28d il Ilr 18 Council Bid Award 1d O 1/10: 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 20 Preconstruction Conference 1d ,'. 2/2 21 Construction 180d 22 - Page 1 7/28/97 • 1996 - 1997 RAIVROJECTS ..____ 1997 .1998 ID Task Name Duration Aug Sep Octi-Nov'Dec JanTFel---iiiVlar Apr May Jun Jul 1A-41Se—pl Oct filoviDec JanIFeb1Mat_I Api iMayiJun I Jul lAug Se. Oct Nov 23 Street Rehab-Tknarron etal 370d 24 Design 93d 00% • x 25 Review Plans 10d im. •ii". 26 Obtain Right of Way Od 27 Finalize Plans 45d k2) ' 0096. 28 Advertise 36d ILSi •I . 29 Council Bid Award id ' 0 *11396 . 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15d . 1M3 31 Preconstruction Conference 1d . <>, /27 32 Construction 120d 0% r , 33 . _ I 34 Rldgecrest Road 259d glp= 1111=1111=511111M11111M.11111111111111M. N 35 Design 100d •.• 36 Review Plans 21d 37 Obtain Right of Way 30d _ _. _.._.. 38 Finalize Plans 10d co 39 Advertise 21d =1 r 40 Council Bid Award 1d K> . __1t3 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d • ED 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d . ‘• 43 Construction 90d . 0% ____ .._.:_ . - _ _ _____.___________ . _. • _. . _.___ 44 — Page 2 7/28,197 AIIII 1996 - 1997 R. PROJECTS ir 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration Au. En Oct Nov Dec Jan FeborQaro®®orm Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Marj 1I IMay1Jun Jul]Aug SeplOct Nov 45 Continental Blvd 327d 46 Design 64d ‘Wr,A4 ei 47 Review Plans 21d r 48 Obtain Right of Way 45d /was , u�u� r 49 Finalize Plans 10d ® „� 60 Advertise 21d ® rya. r, 51 Council Bid Award 1d 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d t T 53 Preconstruction Conference 1d — — 2/24 64 Construction 180d 65 66 Burney to Cul-de-sac 178d t —.... 57 Design 30d r ME 58 Review Plans 15d 69 Obtain Right of Way Od „ 60 Finalize Plans Sd D ^— -- iv 61 - Advertise 21d ® r, 62 Council Bid Award 1d 0 .- Oi"."423____ . 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15d • 64 Preconstruction Conference 1 d ., 1/19 65 Construction 90d a.����� k\s;����� 0% Page 3 7/28/97 1996 - 1997 R PROJECTS • Critical : " Baseline Milestone Rolled Up Task • Critical Progress Milestone ♦ Rolled Up I ask Piogress Project: :::r>.r Date: 7/28FJ7 Task summary Rolled Up Baseline Task Progress Rolled Up Critical t_. `"" 7-1 Rolled Up Baseline Milestone Baseline • _ Rolled Up Critical Progress M11.11.11111 Rolled Up Milestone ♦ Page 4 7/28/97 City of Southlake,Texas 4111 MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE August 1997 1997-98 Road and Drainage CEP Projects The following projects have been authorized by council, but initiation of these projects is awaiting the next bond issuance: Road Projects Burney front Carroll to Lonesome Dove Love Henry Court Lake Drive Lilac/Pine Johnson Road and Water Line Improvements W. Dove from S.H. 114 to White Chapel Drainage Projects Chapel Downs Channel Improvements Mission Hill Estates Channel Improvements Continental Park Channel Improvements S 41110 1997 - 1998 ROA Y PROJECTS 1997 1988 1999 ® � ID Task Name Duration Jun �og Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Q�[ Jun EnAugj_ Octep Nov Dec Jan IFeb]Mar!Apr IMayjJun Jul mori 1 Burney(Carroll to Lonesome D 226d -- ' — 2 Design 60d vo 3 Review Plans 21d - ;i 1.k 4 Obtain Right of Way Od 5 Finalize Plans 10d • r, 6 Advertise 28d 7 Council Bid Award 1d iT. 17 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d • • ' ' • 9 Preconstruction Conference 1d 10 Construction 90d --- — — :; 0% 11 4- 12 Love Henry Court 166d 1 13 Design 45d 14 Review Plans 21d 15 Obtain Right of Way Od 16 Finalize Plans 10d • 17 Advertise r, — 18 Council Bid Award 1d 4 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 20 Preconstruction Conference 1d 18 21 Construction 45d 096 22 —..._ Page 1 7/28/97 -----0 19971997 - 1998 ROP.AY PROJECTS 1998 i 1999 ID Task Name _. Duration Jun Jul lAug Sep Oct NovIDec Jan Feb Mar Apr[MayIJunIJul lAug[Sep OctINovjDec Jan LFeb[Ma:1 Apr 1 May 1 Jun 1Jul1Au2iSs 23 Lake Drive 226d 24 Design 60d _ - 25 Review Plans 21d i 26 Obtain Right of Way 0d • 27 Finalize Plans 10d itV 28 Advertise --------- - • 29 Council Bid Award 1 d 7 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15d • 31 Preconstruction Conference 1d • 32 Construction • : 33 - - 34 LIIac/Pine 271d • tj 35 Design 75d ,cam ' - :\ v 36 Review Plans 21 d -- : 37 Obtain Right of Way Od - - 38 Finalize Plans 10d i %)" 0Yo 39 Advertise 28d ; -.- -- - - - - - 40 Council Bid Award 1d - 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d /30 43 Construction 120d 3 :: : 44 Page 2 -- --- --- 728/97 _______10 1997 - 1998 ROA Y PROJECTS • 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration Jun 1 Jul'Aug[Sep JOct Nov Dec Jan Feb I Mar l Apr IMay Jun] ulTAug1Sep Od Nov'Dec Jan IFeb1 Mad Apr1M yJJun Jul Au. Ein 45 Chapel Downs-Channel 241d 46 Design 45d r,6 47 Review Plans 21d 48 Obtain Right of Way 30d as Finalize Plans 10d 50 Advertise 28d 51 Council Bid Award 1 d • 7 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 53 Preconstruon Conference 1d di —_. 54 Construction 120d :::i::i::i::::ii:::::::::i::vy::v:;: i::b:::rii::::iii`::%::" 55 Mission Hills-Channel 241d J 57 Design 45d 8 Review Plans t , 9 Obtain Right of Way 30d -— _ 60 Finalize Plans 10d m I', 61 Advertise 28d 62 Council Bid Award 1 d - 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15d — 64 Preconstruction Conference 1 d 65 Construction 120d — - - — 66 • Page 3 -- -_ 7/28i97 19871997 - 1998 RO1.AY PROJECTS --- 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration Jun Jul [Aug Sep Oct[Nov Dec Jan Ma Feb rAug flJul67 Continental Park-Channel 316d Apr May�Jun Jul AuglSep Oct[Nov�Dec JanTFeblMar1 Apr1MaylJul Se. 90d 68 Design ava�����u������ rk 69 Review Plans 21d :::a;::< iiiiiiii 70 Obtain Right of Way 60d fill i*iiniiiilllllillli 'k 71 Finalize Plans 10d 9 _ E iii 0%-- 72 Advertise 28d 73 Council Bid Award 1 d i — — i Z/968 74 Obtain Contract Documents 15d • i 75 Preconstruction Conference 1d ---` i OJ30 76 Construction 120d — iiiNINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIms n - - 0% 8 Johnson Road Water/Paving 376d 79 Design 120d 80 Review Plans 21d _ — -- : i 6 i 81 Obtain Right of Way god ' ----- ' ItitM1911lt1YBlll.\\ ' 82 Finalize Plans 10d ____ _ .__ — 83 Advertise 28d -- --------- 84 Council Bid Award 1d 1/19 - - -- 86 Obtain Contract Documents 15d i 88 Preconstruction Conference 1d 2/11 150d 87 Construction —------- -- 88 — 096 Page 4 7/28/97 1997 - 1998 ROA Y PROJECTS • . _ AI 1997 _. - 1998 1999—. — ID Task Name Duration Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct]No JDec Jan Feb1Mar Apr[Wa Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar A r Ma Jun Jul Au.89 W.Dove 114to White Chapel 315dliplIMINIIIMmimmilimmigimminimmiw [Way 1 -1.__9� P T 11.--1_1� y1_ Q� —• 90 Design 90d — 1 itimuNuviiisimmi 1� 1 Review Plans 21 d E __— INN 1A 92 Obtain Right of Way 60d l :.:•:.; ------- i ie12�YM11111 1 93 ------Finalize ------ Plans 10d --- 94 Advertise 28d i -- — romance °. 95 Council Bid Award 1d 0/8 96 Obtain Contract Documents 15d — assr' 97 Preconstruction Conference 1 d — 0/30 98 Construction 120d — -- — — J Page 5 7/28i97 • 1997 - 1998 ROA AY PROJECTS -- --------- -- • • 3 Critical "" "1 Baseline Milestone Rolled Up Task Critical`Progress Milestone ♦ Rolled Up Task Progress Project: IIP Date: 7/28/97 Task ;::;;•::>.>;:«::;>:::; summary Rolled Up Baseline Task Progress Rolled Up Critical 17- ' 1 Rolled Up Baseline Milestone Baseline • Rolled Up Critical Progress Rolled Up Milestone ♦ Page 6 7/28/97 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM July 31, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Request to Bid A Portable Community Stage As you know, the Parks and Recreation Department budgeted this year to purchase a portable community stage for concerts and special events throughout the city. The cost of a customized stage that is large enough to hold the Lake Cities Community Band is estimated at $25,000. With the cost of the stage over$15,000 it needs to be publicly bid. Please put on the August 5 City Council agenda to consider a request to bid a portable community stage. If you have any questions please contact me at 481-5581, extension 757. 0 KL 41) 5-A , City of South lake,Texas SMEMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for Carroll I.S.D. No. 2, 7-8-9 Grade Secondary School Located on the West Side of N. White Chapel Blvd., Approximately 200' North of the Intersection of Chapel Downs and N. White Chapel Blvd. Background Attached is the proposed Commercial Developer Agreement between the Carroll Independent School District (CISD) and the City of Southlake for the construction of the 7-8-9 School on N. White Chapel Blvd. The Agreement contains standard language; however, several areas relative to fees have been eliminated. In the past projects,we have waived fees with the CISD in the same manner as for other projects. S Discussion Several of the items requested to be waived or for which City reimbursement need to be discussed in more detail. 1. Park Fees CISD has requested that the Park Fees be waived since "many of the proposed facilities for outdoor activities are to be shared jointly between CISD and the City". During public hearings on this property the adjacent residents took the position that they did not want this to be a joint use facility. Approvals by Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council were made with the understanding that joint use at this facility would be restricted. In addition, CISD has not met with the Park Board to discuss any credit or usage. 2. Water Line There is a 12" water line along the frontage of the school. Long term plans propose to replace this cast iron line with PVC. Funds for a portion of the replacement between F.M. 1709 and Highland St.will be requested in the FY97-98 Capital Projects Budget. The reason that CISD is relocating the 12" water line at this time is because of a conflict with the • 5B-1 • CURTIS E.HAWK 7-8-9 GRADE SECONDARY SCHOOL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT AUGUST 1, 1997 PAGE 2 proposed storm drain system and utility relocation. 3. Payment/Performance and 2-Year Maintenance Bonds We are requesting that CISD provide the City with copies of the bonds that they are requiring from their contractors. 4. Fees The fees that have been requested to be waived for this project (not including building inspection fees) are summarized in the table below: FEE TYPE AMOUNT 2%Administrative $10,307.08 3% Inspection 15,460.63 • Water Impact --Domestic 8,000.00 Water Impact -- Irrigation 8,000.00 Sewer Impact 6,400.00 Roadway Impact 11,298.26 Park Fee 25,.E 00 TOTAL $84,781.97 Recommendation Staff recommends that this Commercial Developer Agreement be placed on the Regular City ncil M eting Agenda for August 5, 1997 for City Council review and consideration. Attachments: Developer Agreement Plat Exhibit M:WP-PILES COMMERCr7.N DEV•AOR.MEM • sa-2 • 7-8-9 SECONDARY SCHOOL OFF OF N. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT 08/05/97 An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer (Carroll Independent School District), hereinafter referred to as the 'Developer' "CISD", of for 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd., hereinafter referred to"Addition"to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this agreement is applicable to 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd (a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the CISD shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The CISD will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit,performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an • amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the public facilities to be constructed by the CISD, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the CISD fails to complete the work within two (2)years of the signing of this agreement between the City and CISD. All bonds should be approved by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the CISD and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s)or other entity reasonably acceptable to City,hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of CISD's obligations specified above. C. The CISD agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20%of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required • maintenance. 58-3 • D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove, which are intended to be public facilities, shall be vested in the City of Southlake, and CISD hereby relinquishes any right,title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City,through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides CISD with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete,have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which CISD awards his own construction contract, CISD agrees to the following procedure: CISD agrees to pay the following: a: Inspeetioii fees equal to duce ticicent (3%) of the cost of the watci; street,drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement fur whidi CISD awaits his ut hut own eutisti u tioii contract-tcrbe-Paid-Prior-to-constructioir of each-Phase-and-based-on a t,tioi e-ust, 17 Administrative Piu ebbing Fee equal to two pcieeiit(2%) of the oust • otei, street,diainag , included in this agiceillcllt fur which. CISD awaits his ui lici Uwir eoristi ul , utiun of caeli phase and based on actual bid cuusti uctiuii oust, e: Trench testing-(95%-Standard); d: The--additional charge for inspections-during Saturday, Sunday, holidays and afternorrnal working hours; e. Any chaiges_forretestiiig as a resultoffailed tests, All gradation tests i equired-to--insure-proper-cement and/or lime stabilization: 3 The City agrees-to-bear-the expense-of: a: Il nuclear density-tests on the roadway subgrade- o d); tr Tecll ii ' ornLrete-cylinddrs, and c: Concrete-cylindertests and concrete curing-samples • 5B-4 1. CISD agrees to pay for all inspection fees when inspection is required on • Saturday or Sunday. 2. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. F. The CISD will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days written notice, should the CISD fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the CISD for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after CISD has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the CISD or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. • H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The CISD agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. J. The CISD agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITEWATEB: The CISD hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd. to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the CISD's engineer and released by the City. Further, the CISD agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance • 58-5 S No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs,materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the CISD for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at CISD's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. The City agrees to provide temporary water service at CISD's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE: CISD hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by CISD's engineers,released by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: III (not applicable) If applicable, the street construction in the 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd., commercial development of the City of Southlake Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the CISD's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 2. The CISD will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the CISD and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by an engineering study performed by the Director of Public Works. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed IIIprior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of 58-6 • street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the CISD and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The CISD has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE_SANIT RY SEWER FACIT,ITIES: The CISD hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd. to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the CISD's engineer and released by the City. Further, the CISD agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. • E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the CISD agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The CISD agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the CISD's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the CISD,the CISD will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the CISD does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It understood by and between the City and CISD that the 7-8-9 Secondary School off of N. White Chapel Blvd. may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The CISD agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or • 58-7 S specialty items such as walls,vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture,pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. S • 58-8 • G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and CISD that the CISD may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the addition. The CISD agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The CISD understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the CISD shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for • Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. The CISD, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. 5. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub- Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. INREMINIFICATION CISD COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS,OF WHATSOEVER HIND OR CHARACTER,WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND • 58-9 • OTHER CONSULTANTS),ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY,ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF CISD, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. CISD AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the CISD pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the CISD, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their • design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the CISD shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the CISD shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the CISD without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. • ss—io • E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the CISD awards his own construction contract, the CISD agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the CISD, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by CISD and complete such work at CISD's expense; provided, however,that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES: • A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: CISD will construct the off-site drainage facilities as shown on the approved plans. B. OFF-SITE SEWFR: not applicable B. OFF-SITE STREETS: CISD will reconstruct N. White Chapel Blvd. to a three-lane section along the property frontage and for necessary transitions to the north and south. C. OFF-SITF WATER: Due to the expansion of N. White Chapel Blvd., the existing water line needs to be moved. CISD will construct the new water line and the City agrees to reimburse CISD for the cost of the new water line at the time of completion. S 5B-11 • D. PARK FEES: The CISD agrees-to pay-the-Park-Fee-$500-per--acre, in accordaiiee with the Subdivision-Ordinance-No483;Section 7.0. Theie-are-approxiniateiy-?acres in ? whrich-wotrhfbring-the-total cost-of Park Fee to-$?. Because many of the proposed facilities for outdoor activities are to be shared jointly between CISD and the City,no Park Fees will be required for this Project. E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. CISD: By: Title: • Address: Date: ATTEST: Notary Public Type or Print Notary Name My Commission Expires S 5 8-12 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • • 5B- 13 • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. • 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. M WP-FILES'COMMERCI 7-X-9 DEV-AUR.WPD SB-14 • • • EXAS I 1 I O"ON I SOUTHLAKE ASSEMBLY OF GOD COUN"1 TNR"A"T 19 LOT I.1FUR97..1 WHEREAS.4RROLL INBEIENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.ACTING IT AND THROUGH THE UNOERSWYED,ITS I7 Soo a• n na.r.^yNia- I SOAK TSf+RL VS DOLT AUTHORIZED•GENT,IS THE SOLE OWNER 0(•TRACT Of LAND SITUATED IN THE TA.NOoo SURVEY. R� ai I N"•• +` I r-=q un[3Yr •RSTRACr NO.706,COUNTY Of TARRANT.ACCORDING TO THE OM RECORDED IX vOLUYL 12315.PACE Iw7. •1 I Y-^wY.Z7C'^i.o-.N.( I i'R I t N NODo� '•= I �• I CV.A,a 3N ERTCT,S•q TRACT BEING ALL THAT PROPERTY is TOLUNE)9n,PACE S.ERUCT,..0 BEw0 NOR[ _ 2I IAR1gUGRLr AS FOLLOWS: t' 9 ' •CCINNING•T•I/]•FOUND IRON Roo AT THE wUTNEASi CORNER a LOT 1.OLDCK I.CARROLL I50 Nu.I 4� Itl ��• ••« 1 R� p I at �t 1I, ;��; $ I52'35 E VI ,.00' ;3l` 7 i L ADDITION.RECORDED IN CABINET A.SLATE]sss,PLAT RECUR..TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS: lj. `� ,{ 4a. \- 1 ii /M �((q 1S IT., 1 �I \/`[��a'�A/ �a �,I "�� \y A. THENCE M 00'DI'1]•E.WITH THE EAST UII[Of l01 1,11000 I.CARROLL ISO N0.1.IOOIIg0.A OISr.NCa - "`iw'• �ii wan._`'a- Rol IT -Ii_L 'r 1�� J(/ 110.- • H rFn rt A. •T i", t v 1!]).90 FEET f0.L f0Ux0 1/]•IRON 1100: -S,uit[bY,'LOL-.-r.-- f - .-� - =- - l• /��(.y�a� Bf� n, THENCE S 6r5]•S3•C.GEINER.LLY ALONG AN OLD We Hilt TERM PASSING•]1/2'OUTSIDE DINAR.PIPE COCA.A.735.f-1). `�r.>- . -� '{�'� F• j�lld - t, AT If.a.ff.FEET W ALL {SO.W FEET 0•SET 1/2•IRON ROD FOR A CORNER.SAGO PONT BEING NI Wql[ O W DEG. « 93.7R6 SO. f OR LiS CRES •' ' ''. V 1$1 f61}I•d B CHAPEL ELTO AND KING UT THE CALLED EAST LIME Of THE T.X000 SUwR; 5. j�Lt .: �,•t L.azi si• 1 0< •^ " 73 1 THENCE s o0.01'].•W.WIT THE c.uso EAST UNE of THE I.H000 SORBET A..METE CHAPEL nr0,A /- k • I 0 DISTANCE OF 1340.90 HET 10 A SET PR NAIL FORA CORNER: I r YLL w_arcuwc.IN[ _� /_LeU40wc u I I l03 7ar0 sf rm I V 'O / J/`1 /�/-1 L A THENCE R 6rlf's7'r,WITH TM[NORM UM[Of BEOCK 1,0•K HILLS ESGT[S,I•SSING I ]•IRON R005 AT I1• , U • • a� • �� .BUCK 2 Iw y II b O I6..FEET AHD ss.]B HET,IN ALL Ib».07 FEET TO A 1 FOUND IRON 90 fa MI ANGLE PWNT AT THE 1111 (�{ 1 s] `\ L987 ACRES f� 9 2 CONNOR CORNER W Out HILLS ESTATES,AND LOT I.BLOCK 1.SANWN ESTATES: • I • v • .J `LL JO/t I S0. I�R�� * ♦ THENCE N Br»'Io'r.WIN THE NORTH ERNE or LOT 1,rocN I.S.M.[STArEI•DISTANCE OF 3I0.9/ I1 st4 V FUT To THE POINT OF BEGINNING AHD CONTAINING 00.Y]ACRES Of L.O.NODE a LESS. .....PROPOSED 15'WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT(TYP)'''\\\\\ L •I1 .p,� `- 2� 1 �� O 1 I r^1 II 31 •(* �qr LIB Now.HILL CAE,(1.01 ALL YEN IT THESE PRESENTS: T._ . �• •X-I \ ` 0 t1Y1,00101. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL FOOT,n AND MROUGN THE UNO(RSIOIEO.ITS DOLT I • • •• .. j�1p�1 / \� P AUTHORIZED AGENT,00ES HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAT OELGN•TING THE H[REINA•0TE DESCIORD REAL PROPERTY ��LO �• �LOQi -_ Y • .]O.W 1 I ]ows sf 1•. b HE CARROLL AT No.1(PUBLI,AN•ODIf STREETS TO TOE CITY OF SWTNLANE.1THEREO COUNTY.TEXAS..No w •wwwY away /A, / • •I ' S V NE6EAY MCAT(TO 11a MOOS A TT S1RE(TS AND EAS[N(RIS SIIO.OI THEREON. 44.4Q�A �S'OR 1,934, 7 SO. FT.• : 0l 11 ` M 10 I OY r___.- w••F 'Y ?e \` R : f:{�- i !1 j wlw[ss NI NANO a an TIN OAT Of m) •( 'YV L I.S.O. ....... N••• ■y RO •ry Ntf I �qv • r, �]D/ ( • M [' •: M-fSei,Yi ]forh`•2_ (� ASCOT DR -_!).1 • �. ` • r S STATE Of r[SAS ZO • • R 4 _ lY7 py,rf COUMIY Of TARRANT Cl• L•�If• L , 1I•N.00' WOK Y[.ME UNDERSIGNED Wt0ORI1Y ON THIS DAT PERSONALLY APPEAR.K1N[L BROWN.Of 1• • • • i1 11 1 S CARROLL INOEPCNOENT SCHOOL DI51RN:1,KNOWN TO YE 70 SE TOE PERSON 10105E MANE R SUBSCRME0 TO ONE 101(00ING WSTRUOCHT.•HO ACKNOWL[OGCO TO YE TIa(N[G[CUTED IIK SARI[FOR Tf.E PUIIPOS[S ....1 E I" T __ • •• ••�� H' ll •�, nwrt aty i; . • �• II .,L� ).ND CONSIO[RArgx IN[RCIN EIPR[SSED,IN ML U.PAtIn MLREIx STATED AND/3 THE ACr ANO 0[[D Of N J� y • I •t4 II I.Y_ Z SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT. �DE� , 1= al' TO•A1NYe.n Iw.r ap r`•py Y„ Y 1 N I; ZONED if NY AlKR UNCUT NT IMNO AND SEAL Of OFFICE ON THIS THE___OAT Of ,Ifn. z W� U tga.�` rx ,��// -_ fl IL ❑d o-+ 7 C � 1»ar i iyx ��=iRIA Yi:f <e A NAIO,P labile a And far NI Pak a tacos y = N v..31 (\Rq�� �; a i4 At,T NBB , ( \ Ix LfT,I R O_ VY, Maevdt__iw w'�SLi[ (Tf�l \ i,s 3 Y $I �) fr 0 0 • I I L D'd= iolic criZ • - •-d ��J • „�a„' 1 LL1af11lIlI��)l,z ITT, GROSS ACREAGE L f I k.3 • rI ' ' 50.032 c E1� A • i.1 C ,I • I.O.W. 0E0.•w 3.339 ACRES 1 .u�M fy-. • 1 S '• NET•ACERAGE AFTER R.O.)T, DEG. - 47.393 ACRES E' uuAuu uD2A�HAN • i i• N S �� CARROLL ♦ XL iINYSRWN 7 ��d f f r III 1 r+----. A _ f Idol NUKE T7fOTa uuHE.1....BL tpvrtK TOO •CREnxW N STRICT u �\ I/ CY Ii ( I. r1e BE• ,K2 • XAH•.,FS.119 I%• IAI 11 II .�•`t "' i 1 • "'y.• ,,p�•B}�tR1Cl i I eAl9P• 100E_ 6, -- . y._ _ t y •SOP' '8$ h•w••1aw /-/ al.9 'GE •• I FI 23 SNT I I PROPOSED 15•WIDE UTILIV EASEMENT(TYP) E• L �PRI%►)•+ • ���yy�g A Son• • - •. cA3.E31 �_J�'-'��i u,.w�r[NE»- ra�u _a a•.7• __,".ate __ i {\fib ( _ y Y � a. ]. __ prY�R[�/(N 88.36'10' ; �..�_I` �'1 _�« Imo)-rll/'�l IyS_ -�� �-r-wA. Ru - ,>.0 1 Ij. 4,r c•RA DLIR 310.97 I I p 1 I1� I I s R1I8d n 1 l0 1 B C III BC 11 7 I 1I dNOW 36'5 'W- .O •-1 I1 SANDLIN ESTATES TO lgy I I ,All Bill 11 1 • R< 5 I 1 .HI Ind zoom if r01 tar 1,BLOCK/ WR11 Lai r i 0 :OAK HI ESTATES u3 • 1 I 1 I gy1 - II o.1!] i 9 "C.M GALA,SL I6RA- II -J---L__eL - dL.,,, ,,,-7,.. - /IO Kt `I _ I 3 ] cd1 '1::z3 ZONED Ac 1I1�•^ - RE.Na ERR A,sL RI! ` L I I 1-1 n nwa VICINITY MAP �--1 pY I, W CHAPEL DOWNS DRIVE i3 ze.co sf]u -RRxL--I-��^� A a 3r GIGO.0.40.,. "r"iH� «nnn.Y>.o L.�� CHAPEL?... a, Mil: 1'i ' 1 REC'D MA 121997 U • AN•, Ti.:a - "• ."I•7'1"4.. DaTn•X•1 .Y.DBB _ a rf v.r[iA/ 3 E a:* ->.W :.•N�.. N. ..p.N-•'w�N •• 1 �a ,� a 6 II !•�_ •" 3RI �'J-ev3 .•«""w t ...« • I,I.O.«••IAI••••• �$,': F•:�„ Iild',,1 I,9 t t r ' r 47 la E PRELIMINARY PLAT Ih.I N T,•w.0.Ur.Of al.......ww••1....FA.Iwr 1••NTI r T•.«•.6 ow c v a•••..L..:..C",(........,::` ....v ••...e w w,. I YI# v.ro of JO L � �I -y I��//F_J�LN t=aa TAT 1, BLOCK 1 wain.umicmeo maw..WS II.!! it '�I%V .0,1 4. LOT 1, BLOCK I 1111111116126128.1129 e.Na. N 1/:CO w..F I trial <'0 "-'""'w a.J.i CARROLL ISD NO. 2 ADDITION •..f1.L.a T..•.••.I•.uy.M>.w.L.. "'^IN" DINT v "'- f--' ' r a..,1 •e• 1 p f �'•"�� r ,N AN ADDITION TO ..w .... Y J M S r -� f•R�i THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1 I.YfEEE \fir I TARRANT COUNTY, TEXASt_,� � M�=I �� SaB3R ACRES OF BEND OUT OF THE T.N.HOOD SURVEY.ABSTRACT No.706 u7 atiaat s W Aw a I �Ip � �FA/t•-•+ JANUARY, t997 M arlbliV!)WllliYY TITER FLAT FWD IN LLMNn.JUHO 9- OATS W6 N..la n-om City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into a Commercial Developers Agreement for The Village at Timarron, Phase I Located on the South Side of W. Southlake Blvd., at the Southeast Corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and Byron Nelson Parkway BACKGROUND Venus (Drews) Partners V, L.P., is the developer for the Village at Timarron, Phase I Addition. All public utilities, water and sewer, will be within the development and therefore a developers agreement is necessary. The agreement is standard except for the following change: • II.F. The last sentence has been altered to read, "The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements." This excludes the statement, "until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association." The Developer agrees to pay park fees of $500.00 per acre with approximately 3.50 acres, which totals $1,750.00. The developer also agrees that construction activities will meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Mayor be authorized to enter into a commercial developers agreement with Venus (Drews) Partners V, L.P., and that this item be placed on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Commercial Developers Agreement 5C-1 • THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON, PHASE I COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT 08/05/97 An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the"City", and the undersigned Developer,hereinafter referred to as the"Developer",of The Village at Timarron,Phase I Addition, hereinafter referred to "Addition"to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to The Village at Timarron,Phase I Addition(a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. L TENERAL R_F.QUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the • City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds should be approved by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. S 5C-2 110 D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove, which are intended to be public facilities, shall be vested in the City of Southlake, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City,through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgment that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; • b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result-of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and • c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. 5C-3 • The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility,the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any • work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACTT.ITIES: A. ONSLTE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of The Village at Timarron, Phase I Addition to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake • requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than 5C-4 S the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. The-City agrees-to provide-temporary-water service-at Developers request-and-expense forconstruction; testing-and-irrigation-purposes-only,—to-individual lots-during-the-construction of buildings;eveii though-sanitary-sewer service-may-not-be-available-to-the-buildings B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning,permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: (if applicable) If applicable, the street construction in The Village at Timanon, Phase I Addition, commercial development of the City of Southlake Addition shall conform to the • • requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by an engineering study performed by the Director of Public Works. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. • 5C-5 • It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON STTF SANTTARY-SEWER FACIT,TTTES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of The Village at Timarron, Phase I Addition to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees • to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours,the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It understood by and between the City and Developer that the The Village at Timarron, Phase I Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements. until-suchrresponsibility-is-turned-overto-a homeowners-association: • 5C-6 • G. I TS.E OEPUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for • Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. 5. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub- Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. IND MNIEICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, • 5C-7 SEXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE,OCCUPANCY,USE,EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the S Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence_of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof,to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. S 5C-8 • E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition,the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES: • A. OFF-SITEDRAINAGE: (not applicable) pp ) B. OFF-SITE SEWER: (not applicable) C. OFF-SITE WATER: (not applicable) D. PARK FEES: The developer agrees to pay the Park Fee $500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 7.0. There are approximately 3.50 acres in The Village at Timarron, Phase I Addition which would bring the total cost of Park Fee to $1,750. E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585. • 5C-9 • SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: Venus (Drews Partners, V, L.P. By: John Drews,President, Drews Realty Group Title: Manager Address: 5440 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 150 Dallas, Texas 75230 Date: ATTEST: Notary Public Type or Print Notary Name My Commission Expires CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • 5C-10 • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. • 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. M.'.W P-FILES COM M ERCI'.THE-V ILL DEV.AOR.W PD • 5C-11 • • . . . • • • Q— ::.-t- 5Ou .or K.O. TM.NO. 1701 I (1.•• r moor 0.0..)K• I 11r.e n c 270,11_r M- w r... t a ur E uLnt 0.8 ' serl— — I— — � . IT oo r to I 1rr YCD If VU UQ_la cks C I I 0 LOCATION MAP M i I• Pr•1 2 a r M BLOCK SO I x^ I 1m. 89 I C ® Ii• 4. .r.71,sr 5R II No SCALE IN rEtl I »•^Rr... 1•-r0• ..... I I ^ II 1 r,.","w'•,....., 4 _ .rM.••M.. ............•aw •M .r,. _ Ha i I I k I -1 I ...t.i:,r. ••::.. ::a�w �,P. M • ....K. M u 0 wow.mow... Q i I I I A ' .$ "I�r c'w:�:"rr ,I�r.»▪ "���'n.n.R`wan"'�...•...s JF I $ IMP. owe+..$ «:i'+'e�`::p'e.•II~ , rM.rl •1111..w..l.,...m..w....— I s.r.n s SLOGS II • w.▪"Y: .1040�:�.1 A' 1;pa"'..�" .. ,� '.:.`ae�" 1 '� x7u sr. .. ..•NI 0•a ;'� J I ,.�,a .� I .... .M.,r •5------...w _S_ L -•7 orox re:NI.••••••Wil:.•.n 111.1•a.W"or i..,.n......e.e.....r..,.s.»n... •., CI — ::trat�=.1,�,•.t'.1•••• is «» ANN u• NMP• .. •a xu n,..r I ...�'I ••...OW. .1.a.rP�.w.,.s.•4..gew.a. .i�m'. 'a.n".. n_ '.if,C 1 1C`. o.y .w • _ I •'t' '�I I i •, M• I w w4I WOG N.."1•4r.w O h .!M N.<.•.i is NO r.•R,M NW tr �1MI .. • ".1"`.7.,w»,.•e m".iwi'w"'i,.r•"�w..s..•es.e.,w aw..sr•.... 1I ~I .�r1� _ _ N I I = I» ( I erWs 1 ".I:r +i' .i,i i N 6•r•w•1N M•W V.... ••••Woe.••••.W.OW IN11 M.O.• 01 ��'�� We V0.010 0 .Mww� I II I »., I I I ▪ ^M•1•w.�w_w...0•,.»1.00 •» �M ._,....:-�•:;•....._....,.... I I OL M rr'1f•9•• 1 + ' Y� ' 11•f• I i 1 ▪ Nw•1M l•M•.1 v AI.NW I =6..a V1r•iM.I w" w VN ID-2711.OT I I I 11 rlou.01 .211.6O I t.n 1.0 I.C.11•e1 I C r.N i l'N'2Y I I I ' I I i t••w w."••ww.o Owe.•.•�•••••1M.•••.••n< I ^ 8 ITt• 'LOCK i° 12 1rw:wa...f M.•.M+...K G. �..w.w■ • y II I •••..18w�....M,M..e.11-1.M_.,.1. r2f.012 Sr. • OA // E tT w / I I I RMOw.o°.-IOMM6 CON1•S90N .MM M0•V WIN M..[•AW • 'I 0.1[1 .w.•.,.•...� T/ / I I ..,7°.: •.•..•1 t I I barium r r.n• r,./K'.:t'w•t:• II /e i/ I/ ,+r ,.• I I II t11r meet 1Mr ' %i• •dir'/. _-f� _ ..._. . I-1i aAkle w-.7F' '-1---1 -- '3 i/ \ I FINAL PLAT •rj ,....,.,•r, 11i LOTS 2,3 & 4 BLOCK 90 I TIMARRON ADDITION i PHASE 6 ' /' I I`T .•.r. ' '^'' _ _I I rot+s _ m o,.•to• ••••• 'wM win• L I. io,sPAR A RE. AT OF _ »,�4 _ _ BLOCK 1,LOTS IA. 18. AND IC 1 _ _ _ or OILG PLACE w X�nswti F2.a •'Miw.w I Won•••&•a•✓'•Mirte�t•.,I wItir,..ra OUT P n( l' / _ i .I I I 1• OM.Mpr1 9,..t1,.91101C1 MO Ofr ��. % rr,. . 1 I I 1•••»•"•••,y 1 M••• .•.t..•1 s n »wnM Wt..•t•n•.♦ OK f.l♦ "'�.11•MI COON Ir.It 111 % .I IM/.w P.•w.w.raw lN.•nw-'•� Or smog0•. 7 • ,T•„ 1•.M.^ ...w..�....f•.w w ww�»ow�.e •n•1..» 7627 ACRES/]LOTS • • • I :I.w wrnl•»...M.wK=.w1�'.,w.M n�.•. "n.M'�. .'..�'::.:'.w1. Own 0/1:0.11 M[0 r...••Or.I.NO C00vd1•ir0.1 I_ I NMNO.1[03 11067 (714)114.1)7) • 1.0,0rO/ywMM `. rz CarforNBorqoaa l " RECD OCT 11 1996 ice;~�� "` ^ own. it car^ •, ••w1T• •^•'•^• ,••• INS a••..rn.1 OW.w ..0 oCTOOER 1996 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM SAugust 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to Advertise for Bid of 12-inch Water Line Along the Proposed Kirkwood Blvd. from Dove St. to the Existing Kirkwood Blvd. and Enter Into an Agreement with MTP/IBM for the 12-inch Water Line BACKGROUND Water service is scheduled to be extended to the IBM complex at Solana. This will eventually replace the water service they currently receive from the Trophy Club MUD #1. The attached Executive Summary from the June 10-11, 1997 City Council Retreat will provide background for this request. S In summary, to accomplish this a proposed 12-inch water line will be installed along the proposed Kirkwood Blvd. It will extend from Dove St. to the existing Kirkwood Blvd. across Maguire-Thomas Partners/IBM property. MTP/IBM are providing the necessary easement and letter of agreement for your action. However, if for some reason the agreement is not ready for the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda, staff would recommend proceeding with the bid process as City Council can withhold award of the bid if the agreement is not completed prior to the award of bids. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends authorization to advertise for bid of a 12-inch water line along the proposed Kirkwood Blvd. from Dove St. to the existing Kirkwood Blvd and enter into an agreement with MTP/IBM for the 12-inch water line. Please place this item on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Draft 12-inch Water Line Agreement S June 10-11, 1997 City Council Retreat Executive Summary Map of Area 5D-1 Draft ojJulv3, 1997 t ti1‘,. ? O12-INCH WATER LINE AGREEMENT For and in consideration of the agreements and monies to be paid as set forth below, the following agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of the day of , 1997, by and among Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership (the "Partnership"), International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), 300 Convent Street Corporation d/b/a Kirkwood Hollow Development ("Kirkwood") (the Partnership, IBM and Kirkwood collectively referred to herein as the "Owners") and the City of Southlake ("Southlake"). RECITALS A. Southlake wants to build a 12-inch water line and a 20-inch water line to serve property in Southlake including property owned by the Owners and the Owners want to allow Southlake to do so. The parties want to fix the location and terms of the necessary easements and to allocate and provide for the payment of the costs of constructing these water lines. B. The Partnership owns property described as Lot 1, Block B of the Replat of MTP-IBM Addition No. 1 of the City of Southlake recorded in Volume 388/211, Pages 68 & 69 of the Tarrant County Map and Nat Records, Tan-ant County, Texas (the "Property) on which an office building, related parking facilities, and other structures have been built. The Owners, as a condition to their agreement herein, require that Redundant Water Service (as hereinafter defined) be provided in S accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, to the Property and to the other property owned as of the date hereof by the Owners in Southlake which may be developed in the future. C. Southlake plans to construct a ground storage tank and booster pump station on T.W. King Road north of the Owners' property in 1997 which will be connected to the existing Southlake water lines, water facilities and elevated 1.5 million gallon water tank. The 12-inch and 20-inch water lines referenced above will be constructed as part of this construction work. AGREEMENT 1. The Recitals set forth above are hereby adopted by reference for all purposes and are declared by the parties to be true and correct. ___2_._ Redundant Water Service, as defined for the purposes of this Agreement, shall mean that adequate water pressure and flow shall be made available to the proposed 12-inch water line from both the south and north(dual feed) connection points at all times. The south connection point will be served by the City of Southlake elevated water tower at the corner of White Chapel Road and Dove Road and the north connection point will be served initially by a cross-connection to the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District (MUD) No. 1 water tower on T.W. King Road and eventually by connection to the future City of Southlake ground storage reservoir on T.W. King Road. The Stemporary cross-connection to the Trophy Club MUD No. 1 water tower will include an automatic 5D-2 135307 5,SP3,SLa CLL2.070397 • . Svalve that will provide adequate water service to the 12-inch water line in the case that the water supply from the City of Southlake falls below acceptable levels for water service. 3. The 12-inch water line along the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard and the 20-inch water line along White Chapel Road shall be located on the property owned by the Owners in the locations shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 4. The form of easements to be granted by the Owners shall be as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 5. Both water lines will be constructed by a general contractor selected by Southlake. Southlake shall, promptly after selection, notify the Owners of the identity of the general contractor. 6. All costs of surveying, engineering and construction of the 20-inch water line, the pumping station and ground storage tank shall be paid by Southlake. 7. The costs of surveying, engineering and construction of the 12-inch water line shall be shared by Southlake and the Owners as set forth herein. Southlake and the Owners shall secure a bid for construction of the 12-inch water line from the general contractor selected from the list set forth in section 5 above which bid shall specifically state the cost of constructing the 12-inch water line and the difference in the cost between constructing the 12-inch water line and an 8-inch water line in the same location. Southlake will be solely responsible for the payment of the cost of oversizing the 8- • inch water line to a 12-inch water line. The cost of constructing an 8-inch water line shall be charged against the amount owed by Southlake to the Owners, • _07 witheut-the-Owxefs' r-prio , writterrappr-oval. The costs of constructing an 8-inch water line shall be paid by Southlake and such payment shall be credited against the outstanding obligation of Southlake to the Owners under that certain Utility Contract of May 4, 1987, by and between Southlake and a predecessor in interest to the Owners. 8. Southlake shall cause its general contractor to secure a commercial general liability insurance policy with limits of at least S2,000,000 and to name the Owners as additional insureds on such policy and to deliver certificates evidencing such coverage to the Owners prior to commencement of construction work on any property owned by the Owners. 9. Southlake shall not allow any mechanic's or materialman's liens to be filed against the property owned by the Owners and, if any such liens are filed, Southlake shall immediately take all necessary action to cause such liens to be immediately released. _4., 10. Neither Southlake nor its general contracto.shall allow any environmentally hazardous materials to be placed in, on, under or upon any property owned by the Owners in connection with the construction contemplated hereby and Southlake shall cause its general contractor immediately to remediate any such hazardous materials placed in, on, under or upon any property owned by the Owners at Southlake's or such general contractor's cost, if Southlake or its general contractor breaches this provision. • 135307 5,SP3,SLR Ca:070397 SD-3 • . • 11. Southlake shall be solely responsible for the construction contemplated hereby and shall obtain, at its expense, all necessary permits, including permits relating to wetlands. 12. Any notice or other communication which may be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be, (a) personally delivered; (b) transmitted by United States postage prepaid mail, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; (c) transmitted by reputable overnight courier service, such as Federal Express; or(d) transmitted by legible facsimile to the parties hereto as listed across from the signature line for each party. 13. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 14. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no oral or written agreements between the parties, nor any representations made by either party relative to the subject matter hereof, which are not expressly set forth herein. 15. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES PERTAINING TO TRANSACTIONS IN SUCH STATE. ii16. In the event it becomes necessary for either party hereto to file suit to enforce this Agreement or any provision contained herein, the party prevailing in such suit shall be entitled to recover, in addition to all other remedies or damages, as provided herein, reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in such suit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year so indicated for each party hereinbelow. 1 "Southlake" Address: The City of Southlake, a Texas municipal corporation 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76042 Fax: By: Date: Its: S 5D-4 135307 5,SPISLRCLL2.'070397 • Approved as to form: The "Partnership" Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, a Texas general partnership Address: 355 S. Grand Avenue By: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Dallas, Ltd., Suite 4500 a California limited partnership, general partner Los Angeles, California 90071 Fax: By: Maguire Partners Solana, LLC, Date: a California limited liability company, its general partner By: Maguire Partners SCS, Inc. a California corporation, its manager By: Its: Address: By: International Business Machines Corporation, • One Old Orchard Road a New York corporation, general partner Armonk, New York 10504 Fax: Date: By: Its: "IBM" Address: International Business Machines Corporation One Old Orchard Road a New York corporation Armonk, New York 10504 Fax: Date: By: Its: • 135307.5iSP3JSLHJCLL2.070397 5D-5 . • • "Kirkwood" 300 Convent Street Corporation Address: d/b/a Kirkwood Hollow Development, a Texas corporation Fax: By: Date: Its: • • i 35307.5/SP3/SLH/CLLJ070397 5D-6 EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT#3062 April 15, 1997 • FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION 15'Wide Waterline Easement BEING a 2.145 acre tract of land situated in the James B. Martin Survey Abstract No. 1134, and the U.P.Martin Survey Abstract No. 1015, City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of that called 316.294 acre tract of land described to MTP-1BM PHASE II and III Joint Venture by • deed recorded in Volume 8995,Page 1268,Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas,(DRTCT)said 2.145 acre tract of land being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the point of intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of West Dove Road (a variable width right-of-way) with the easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 114 (a variable width right-of-way) and being the southwest corner of said 316.294 acre tract of land; THENCE South 89°38'47" East, along said northerly right-of-way line of West Dove Road, a distance of 998.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, being in the future westerly right-of-way line of Kirkwood Boulevard(a variable width right-of-way); THENCE along said future westerly right-of-way line of Kirkwood Boulevard the following: North 00°25'42"East,a distance of 243.07 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 1778.00 feet; Northwesterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of 33°59'40" for an arc distance of 1054.92 feet, a chord bearing of North 16°34'08" West and a chord distance of 1039.51 feet to the paint of tangency; North 33°33'58"West, a distance of 481.33 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right • having a radius of 2101.00 feet; Northwesterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 08°16'06" for an arc distance of 303.20 feet, a chord bearing of North 29°25'55" West and a chord distance of 302.93 feet to the point of tangency; North 25°1752" West, a distance of 194.88 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 47°4752"West,a distance of 80.10 feet to the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius point which bears South 61°52'19" West, a distance of 1395.05 feet; THENCE northwesterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of 11°28'14' for an arc distance of 279.29 feet,a chord bearing of North 33°51'48"West and a chord distance of 278.82 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE North 19°54'56"West, a distance of 80.03 feet to a point for corner in said future westerly right-of-way line of Kirkwood Boulevard and being the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius point which bears South 47°22'05" West, a distance of 1424.00 feet; THENCE along said future westerly right-of-way line of Kirkwood Boulevard the following: Northwesterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of 19°02'21" for an arc distance of 473.19 feet, a chord bearing of North 52°09'05" West and a chord distance of 471.01 feet to the point of tangency; North 61°40'15"West,a distance of 170.13 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 1022.00 feet; S Northwesterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 30°35'29" for an arc distance of 545.67 feet, a chord bearing of North 46°22'31" West and a chord distance of 5D-7 Page 1 of 4 539.21 feet to a point for the end of said curve; THENCE North 58°55'14"East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the point of curvature of a non-tangent curie to the left having a radius point which bears North 58'55'14" East, a distance of 1C07.00 feet; THENCE southeasterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of O1°43'06' for an arc distance of 30.20 feet, a chord bearing of South 31°56'19" East and a chord distance of 30.20 feet to a point for the end of said curie; THENCE North 45°24'53"East, a distance of 174.36 feet to a point for corner which is 15.00 feet westerly and perpendicular to the future easterly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard and being the point of curvature of a non-tangent curie to the right having a radius point which bears North 79°15'59" East, a distance of 593.00 feet; THENCE along a line that is 15.00 feet westerly and southerly from and parallel to the future easterly and northerly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard the following: Northwesterly with said curie to the right through a central angle of 02°11'43" for an arc distance of 22.72 feet,a chord bearing of North 09°38'09" West and a chord distance of 22.72 feet to the point of tangency; . 1 North 08°32'18"West,a distance of 838.20 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 487.00 feet; Northwesterly with said curve to the left through a central of 81°45'52" for an arc distance of 694.98 feet, a chord bearing of North 49°25'14" West and a chord distance of 637.49 to the end of said curve; . THENCE North 47°53'18" West, a distance of 157.42 feet to a point for corner; • THENCE South 87°06'42" West, a distance of 226.99 feet to a point for corner in the east line of Lot 4,Block A of MTP-tBM ADDITION No. 1 an addition to the City of Southlake described by plat recorded in Volume 388/211, Page 68, DRTCT; THENCE North 00°09'22"West,along said east line of Lot 4, a distance of 15.02 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 87°06'42" Fact, a distance of 232.48 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 47°53'18" East, a distance of 157.86 feet to a point for corner in the future northeasterly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard and being the point of curvature of a non- tangent curie to the right having a radius point which bears South 00°21'57" West, a distance of 502.00 feet; THENCE along the future northeasterly and easterly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard the following: Southeasterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 81°05'45" for an arc distance of 710.53 feet, a chord bearing of South 49°05'11" East and a chord distance of 652.68 feet to the point of tangency; South 08°32'18"East,a distance of 838.20 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 578.00 feet; Southeasterly with said curie to the left through a central angle of 06°24'46' for an arc distance of 64.69 feet, a chord bearing of South 11'44'41" East and a chord distance of 64.66 feet to the end of said curve; • THENCE South 75°02'55"West, a distance of 15.00 feet to the point of curvature of a non-tangent 50.8 Page 2 of 4 curve to the right having a radius point which bears North 75'02'55" East, a distance of 593.00 feet; • THENCE northwesterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 02°29'23" for an arc distance of 25.77 feet, a chord bearing of North 13°42'23" West and a chord distance of 25.77 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE South 45°24'53"West, a distance of 167.63 feet to a point for corner that is 15.00 feet northeasterly and perpendicular to the aforementioned future westerly right-of-way line of Kirkwood Boulevard and being the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius point which bears North 56°19'54"East, a distance of 1007.00 feet; THENCE along a line that is 15.00 feet northeasterly from and parallel to said future westerly right- of-way line the following: Southeasterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of 28°00'09" for an arc distance of 492.16 feet, a chord bearing of South 47°40'11" East and a chord distance of 487.27 feet to the point of tangency; South 61°40'15"East,a distance of 170.13 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 1439.00 feet; Southeasterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 19°09'34" for an arc distance of 481.19 feet, a chord bearing of South 52°05'29" East and a chord distance of 478.95 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE South 19°54'56"East, a distance of 80.44 feet to the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the right having a.radius point which bears South 50°30'27" West, a distance of 1410.05 feet; THENCE southeasterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 08°44'17" for an arc • distance of 215.05 feet,a chord bearing of South 35°07'25"East and a chord distance of 214.84 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE North 59°33'01"East, a distance of 67.47 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 30°26'59"Fast, a distance of 15.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 59°33'O1"West, a distance of 67.47 feet to a point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius point which bears South 59°51'18" West, a distance of 1410.05 feet; THENCE southeasterly with said curve to the right through a central angle of 01'54'39" for an arc distance of 47.03 feet, a chord bearing of South 29°11'22"East and a chord distance of 47.02 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE South 47°47'52" East, a distance of 80.49 feet to a point for corner that is 15.00 feet northeasterly and perpendicular to the future westerly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard; THENCE along said line that is 15.00 feet northeasterly from and parallel to said future westerly right-of-way line the following: South 25°1752"East,a distance of 197.87 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 2086.00 feet; Southeasterly with said curve to the left, through a central angle of 08°16'06' for an arc distance of 301.03 feet, a chord bearing of South 29°25'55" East and a chord distance of 300.77 feet to the point of tangency; • South 33°33'58" East, a distance of 469.78 feet to a point for corner, Page 3 of 4 5D-9 THENCE North 56°26'02" East, a distance of 88.23 feet to a point for corner, • THENCE South 33°33'58"East, a distance of 15.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 56°26'02" West, a distance of 88.23 feet to a point for corner that is 15.00 feet northeasterly and perpendicular to the future westerly right-of-way line of said Kirkwood Boulevard and being the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius point which bears South 56°32'39"West, a distance of 1793.00 feet; • THENCE along said line that is 15.00 feet northeasterly from and parallel to said future westerly right-of-way line the following: Southeasterly with said curve to the right, through a central angle of 33°53'04" for an arc distance of 1060.37 feet, a chord bearing of South 16°30'49" East and a chord distance of 1044.99 feet to the point of tangency; South 00°25'42" West, a distance of 243.05 feet to a point for corner in the aforementioned northerly right-of-way line of West Dove Road; • • THENCE North 89°39'47" West, along said northerly right-of-way line of West Dove Road, a distance of 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING a computed area of 93,457 square feet or 2.145 acres of land. Bearings called for herein are based on record information of the deed recorded in Volume 8995, Page 1268, DRTCT. A sketch was prepared on even date to accompany this description • F:U016'416AF`701.WF6 S Page 4 of 4 5D-10 \ SEE PAGE 2 ------ --- - - - • \ �.4\ \\ C., \ • • \\\ �f� \� \ \ \ • . ... \\ \\ co \\ g \ ` 10CAT1oN MAP 4.7 S. 1 'gi �` \• \ p o \ \ z \\ ; ;I D. 0 25 100 \ JJ 6ti \ ' \\' 4 1II - 33'59'40' \ t �� CO R • 1778.00' \ t — T - 543.50' \ li (I) L = 1054.92' 1 Lil C8 - N 16'34'08- W —' Ch = 1039.51' \ I 'Q 1 I 0 = 33'53'04 1 ' i R = 1'93.00' I, T = 546.20 • 1 II L = 160 1060.37' 1 III CB S 20 49" E \ li Ch = 1044.99' 1 I 1. I � PROP. WATER UNE. 1 II 1 It • 1 I. I ( I I t5" I I!1 c�0,§1''ft, 1 LI Qrv,QV' 1 I J Z C. • � qj L.• vs. J 15' WATER I ,e`J�. 2 ,. LINE ESMT. `° fi °) - 2.145 Acres ^ �e -' t C4- 93,457 s.f. o Ir7)i I. ' \,. s 1� • 9 II "1 I . N I'; NOTES: BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE v BASED ON RECORD INFOR.NAT'C. POINT OF POINT OF cw I" IN OF 71-4E DEED RECORDED COMMENCING 'POINT gl I VOLUME 8995, PG. 1258 D.R T:7. z I ' A FIELD NOTE =SCRIPTICN WAS LEPAREDO ESC DATE 70 S ______ S 89'38'47' E 998.02' N._ I I -_ N-15 N DATE — .__ `! • '47 W alt. N.l_ H. _ 15.0C J -____-_ Vast .SPNALT-PAVEMENT __ ��Q,`_" *E ________ ". WE-SST ----=D" - �. " HUAD-- EXHIBIT ___ °1R0®`� „OW7 — WATER LINE EASEMENT J. ff=S ' SURVEY, A- 1 620 b Bury-Pittman D.F.W., Inc. PAGE 1 Consulting dflV ' And Surnyan sans.r.. r.n.,.i+.i ti.v.1—n .vs.... . 5D-11 f I 'iP--I _ -.NV, , ., r SEE PAGE 3 . F+ Burl+Pittman D.F.T., Ino: I — t(�im.n.nt s.r. /N59'33'01-- i t S30' -'S9"_.r ram, ei nvw-au r. 00' •-+ww,..'w.'•r��r 67.47' 1 A - 1 t'28'14" k { S59'33'Ga'w 07.47� \ R . 1395.05' T . 140.11' �� J O1'S4'39' J L • 279.29' ` S47.47'52"E ,� 1st0.05' \• — C8 = N 33'51'48" w \ 80.49' i 23.52' Ch 278.82' L - 47.03' o Na7'aT52"w Z C8 - S 29'11'22' E 80.10' U IN Ch s7.J2' = 0 ZS 50 75 100 u' � 1'-too' I� IN , N i 1;N - I C 1 _I 1 I � Iv C i ay CR I ro 1 rn ��,j- e ! ; �/ I I per\fi 4i G C < A - 08'16'06" I i Q\ a� . y R = 2101.00' I I R ) 0 Q�. L • 303.20' � I J° '7 Cs - N 29'25'55" W 1 '2 — CC Ch = 302.93' I 1 ; D3 ' Z 1 O 1 "7 1- I I O '� I Q t 0 - 08 t 6'06" 1 R - 2086.00' T - 1 50.78' j I 1 L - 301 3' C8 - S 2525'55" E F CQ 1 Ch - 300.77'cr) \ i km 1.4 i • .\ --I _____------ 1 0 1 co \ 1 C \�� I - ° I r o`, PROPOSED WATER LINE. , I rn ' • 4 1 < \ 0 ''' Z I `N' > ? F.G I U U �/�� 1 I U U t a w I , 1c F ri * 1 DO a IIA I � , u 1a ' 6 15' WATER I LINE ESMT. eti t 93,4574s.f.s 1 , , , sr`�0. p L9. �Q�1Q�.�. I N56'26'0 "E v� Q�\0r �P �G 83 • O 0, }— S33'3 'S8"E \ O�• O• � I i S5o 8.23"'N t S.CO' J A - 33'59'40' �y ( R - 1778.00' T - 543.50' I I • L - 1054.92' 1 C8 - N15'34'08"W Ch - 1039.51' - 33'53'O4" .t� -,•v R = 1793.00' • T = 546.20' _,„ . EXHIBIT L = 1060.37' C8 S 15'30'49" E `�`':`.", WATER LINE EASEMENT I' I Ch - 1044_99 - 5D-12 I I <<�: PAGE 2 SEE PAGE 1 'cc.-&); SEE PAGE 4 ``` 1 • 1 p = 30'35'29" \ = 2500'09" r Bury-Pittman D.F.W., Inc. R = 1022.00' • R = 1007.00' Cocscltm e j laca. 1 and S rve n T = 279.51' \ T 251.10' !0•►fv "v"�1„+^1.wi.sn L = 545.67'.\ L = 492.16' 0�'�`11 =•~'•....au.Ia. CS - N46'22'31'W \ , CB — 547'40'1l'E Ch = 539.21' \ \ ,Ch = 487.27' SYl s4,7 t/,,, A �y l \ S& •s-)._ \ v.\ \\ w } \\/ /•-• Q• �� o�. 0 25®0 \ \ i\�-Ns c•P..'. t' t00• \ \ tt �<2 �o 9 0� / \\\ \ JO \ 7c t �,* \ \\ t \ \ p O \ ` \ � O t t p — 19'02'21' \ R 1439.00' /'(.?. R = 1424.00' T = 242.86' T = 238.80' 1 \ ' L = 481.19' C8 = N7 .109'05' W iCB = S 52'05'29" c / N. Ch = 471.01' 1-9' Ch = 478.95' 1 Oi , K I1 III . ,„. PROP. WATER LINE. I rF�� \ ,., ________, , I < 1 ,I r � I . � I ; , _ Nt 80.036"W / ' t p = 08.44.17'\ '-\./.\\ f,( S19'S4'S6-E i R = ,410.05' \ 15' WATER 11/( au.4a : ,07.73 L 215A5' LINE ESMT. ' I cs : 5 3s5T2s E �.. 2.145 Agee t Ch214.84' �` ' 93.457 s.f. A I t t 6 c, 1 1 t �o'`'' \----------_. _____-- 2 i I i / A- , I I t J,S.� ,ti 1°Q / �.' I N59'33'01"E / ' /� I i i oi. 530'26'59"E • _ UEv � .�. FwaE w e �� pR = 1319 0,54•— T ;� G i1 ' lisr01"W rF)0 0� ' L 20..29' 67. 7 O CB N 33'51'48" ,N111t S4747'S2"E p 01'54'39"`1. Ch 278.82' ••4 1/ 80.49' R = 1410.05' • � •1 1 = 47.03' c \ Na7'a7'S2"'N L = a7 03' ..� . III 80.t0` CS = 529'11'22"E /vim ch 47.02' 0N., /a ea A, EXHIBIT \ WATER LINE EASEMENT 5�13 _/I v��,'� , PAGE 3 '../'/ �` .., , --) 0 SEE PAGE 2 SEE PAGE S / I r Bury—Pittman D.F.W., Inc. Cno ltiej!beaten end SLneyen / I I es.t� t'nenw*inn.e�Lwt� /7 •fie gee+wn� .. / I III / I 0 2550 7�551j00 / 1'.100' I PROP. 'NAT_R LINE. • / I Z N ' f z I� ��� / u N 5�Ji\,L0 lC Eli I^ / e-N\ ��'' • I cm I co I r, O" O• 1!`, .! N N V O` 1 1 Cr Ip6' t 15' WATER r A I I I LINE ESMT. 2.145 Acre! I 4�, 1 t 93.457 s.f. �� J I ? 9-1 -I- ; � I 1 0 I JQ . I • ,.... ,,,„ * p I 1 A = orll'43l i \ R = 593.00' T = 11.36' I + 1 L = 22.72' 1 CB = N 09'38'C9' w A = 06'24'46" Ch = 22.72' R = 578.00' A = 01.43'06 = 32.38 R = 1007.00'1 lI i /LT = 64.69'' T = 15.10' 1 ) CB = S 11'44'41' E L = 30.20' ' 1 i6/ Ch = 64.66' CB = S 31'56'19"\E ►•/ /1 I Ch = 30.20' "% /' F../ / 6� N58'55' 4'E 1 53/ /\off "w 15.00 1.''/ /'l 1 15.00' V •1. 1 `S ay 1 0 - 02'29'23" \ t R = 593.00' \ T = 12.89' L = 25.77' CB = N 13'42'2T W \ 1 Ch = 25.77' A = 28.00'09' �. C \ �// V T = 251.10' �0\4S Gi��G t< . \ ` L = 492.16' Ae 'O cb„••• `� 11�S4 \ a �jCB S 3T30'11 E '' Off, &• < L� Ch = 487.27' J 0 - 3,022.00 / \ �� R - t 022.00' \ \ T 279.51' \\ / O L = 545.57' ✓ `\ IIIC9 N 36 22'31' w \ \ \ Ch = 539.2t• \ \ \ EXHIBIT =PCP. WATER UNE. \\ s WATER LINE EASEMENT 5D-14 \\ s,fn • PAGE 4 i->o, \.o,j. SEE'GAGE 3 e l.t/n, ''" . 1 J ��_ _,� %I I W I 0 25 50 75 100 ,\ -J I"a 100. n m i )C\ .y O .\Z. y • cc n I a, 1 EAST .W. KING BLVD '4C0'09'22"w • Ae\ I5.02' /" I -, �I I� ------- l�' 1SA 1 PROP. WATER LINE. r' 1 *1 r I I 1 11 115' WATERI LINE ESMT� I. N 1 11 a,1 r �� _ = —Pr v 1 I s , � I 1 I tv cot - ,a// coq q. rI\A <0• (1. I A' I 1 J i � 41110 �� / i , I I/ PROP. WATER _NE. / / ‘4% / \</ / 15' WATER �J� ,� v / „ J / UNE ESMT. �� 2.:45 Ac-es A = 81.45'52- / j>• /// ;3,457 s.f. s. R = 487.00' . `V T = 421.59'L = 694.98' /' // J2 Ch8 = 637 49' t a' w �� // fie. . i- / - —- - -__- `a� ��ao l \ R - 802.505- %\ \/ / L • 4729.48' / / CS - 5 49.05'11- E FUTURE ,� Ch •- 652.68' 1A:. —g3$"9 1--- F. ob r ,0 • • EXHIBIT 5D-15 WATER LINE EASEMENT M Bury+Pittman D.F.W., Inc. Consult*Nissen u+su•yon PAGE 5 SEE PAGE 4 `•a,,:, M�" ,. 1/1A/07 ZnG,_^• HUU—U1-177r 1,L1—..-4 r_zL,J,c a_7,L1rt'r,=i x iriri_2_3K i1 (_vc- "-+_ r'.voGile • PERMANENT WATERLINE EASEMENT (LNCLu1MNG TENEPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASE N NI') THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KO W ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § Ti-IAT, LtiTERNATIONAL BUSP_\TESS VIACHT1vES CORPORATION, a New York corporation and 300 CONVEYE STREET CORPORATION, a Texas Corporation (collectively referred to herein as "Grantor"), for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NOI100 DOLLARS (S10.00)aRrl other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by the CITY OF SOUTI-ILAICo-, a municipal corporation situated in the County of Tarrant, State of Texas ("Grantee"),the receipt of hick to Grantor is hereby acknowledged,has granted and conveyed, and by these presents does punt and convey,to the Grantee,an easement for the purpose of construct ng, inspecting, repaiirin.g, main'aining, replacing, changing, removing and operating n subsurface line to transport water,with all incidental equipment and appurtenances (the"Waterline")in, into,upon, over, across and under a retrain 15'wide penxianeot waterline easement(the "Permanent Wattdine Ease-merit"), simated in Tarrant County,Texas and more particularly described.in Exhibit A,which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; together with the right of reasonable ingress and egress across a 30'wide temporary construction easement, which shall be located wholly within the future right of way of Kirkwood Blvd. and which shall be parallel to the 15'wide Permanent Waterline Easement(the"Temporary Construction Ensennent"), situated in Tarrant County, Texas, as shown • in Exhibit B,which is attached hereto and made a part hereof(the Permanent Water Line Easement and Temporary Construction Easement ate collectively referred herein as the"Easemen"). The Easement is executed by Grantor and accepted by Grantee, subject to the following stipulations, terms and col tditions,to-wit: 1. Grantee agt ees hat the Waterline shall be installed and maintained in accordance with its own zoning codes and permits for the City of Southlake, State of Texas, and with all applicable state and federal laws, cot'.es and permits, including Federal wetland laws. 2. Grantor reserves itself, ita successors and assigns, all rights in and to the above described tract of land and the right to use and enjoy the same for any purpose not inconsistent with the purpose for which this Easement is granted, including,without limitation,the tip of Grantor to construct new buildings or structures, or renovate, remove or replace exiathig buildings or structures, as well as the right to plate remove or install landscaping, plants, grass, sills,fences, posts, tights, asphalt-,concrete,tar or similar>n.atetial so as to use the surface area of the F-semerit for streets,curbs and drive-rays, subject to the rights herein granted. 3. Grantee shall use all reasonable efforts to not interfere with Grantor, its tenants, invitees, successors or assigns, during periods of constructing, inspecting, operating, repairi g., maintaining, replacing, changing, removing and operating the Waterline. ; 411) 5D-16 MA-1—CJ 1 -1 J_. l:•.J-,-r-. r _�_L i n_i i ,rr.r•1_. x i n i�._rr. I. i._.•��`+ -r_ i c+�.,1CJ 4. Upon completion of any constraction,repairing, riovi.ag or inspection of, or any S enance to the Waterline, Grantee shall and hereby agrees to repair and restore the affected area to at least as good a condition., as determined by Grantor, as the area w-as in prior to the commencement of any such construction, repairing,removing, inspection or maintrnance. 5. The failure of Grantor,its successors or assigns. to insist in any one or roiDre*nstances upon performance of any of the terms, covenants or condaons of this instrument shall not be construed as a waiver or a relinquishment of the future performance of any such term., covenant or condition by Grantee, but the obligation of Grantee with respect to such future perforrnance shall continue in full force and effect. 6. Grantee agrees that,in the constriction,maintenance and operation of the Waterline, no hazardous materials or hazardous substances,as defined under applic,able federal, state, or local law,as such laws now or he'xinafter czist, Shall be used, stored, generated,released or be disposed of in violation of such applicable law. If, Grantee generates,releases or discharges any hazardous material in const-acting, inspecting, repairing,airing, maintaining,, replacing, changing, removing or operating the Waterline,then the Grantee, shall be solely responsible for any cleanup,rernediation, removal or restoration rnaadated by applicable law; Grantor shall have the right to reasonably approve arty method or retr. iation to the extent such remediation involves land owned.by Grantor, its successors and assigns. 7. Grantee shall cleanup and r-ziove any trash and debris and repair and replace fences, str-eets, curbs and other damages caused by said construction. S $_ The Temporary Con struction Easement s}•all cease and terminate upon the earlier of either(i)ninety(90)days from the day Grantee begins the physical installation of the Waterline, or (ii) February 1, 1997, they all rights to the Temporary Construction Easement shall terminate and revert to Grantor, its successors or assigns. The Permanent Waterline Easement shall exist until the city permanently abandons the premises, irt which event said easement shall cease, terminate and revert to Grantor, its succ::ssorS and assigns. 9. This grant of the Easement is made expressly subject to (i) any and all easements, rights of way, restriction::, liens, and/or encimabrances of any kind that are filed of record in the Tarrant County Real Property Records and/or the Denton County Real Property Records or which an on-the-ground inspect]on would reveal, and(ii) any en oachments, protrusions,taxes for 1997 and subsequent years, and/or zoning, platting or other governmental requirements that affect the land. 10. It is expressly understood that all rights,conveyances or covenants are herein written, and no verbal age e ertls of any k-inr? sha11 be binding or recognized or in any way modify this instrument or conveyance. LN WITNESS WBLREOF,the Grantor has txeceted this instilment as of the day and yew-first above written. • 2 I:CA_•.3 P3:l710eF.>:$;'. n 5D-17 HIJU—CJ I—1 J am( 1 CJ'Y✓ I LLL 1 11V I sJrI V LL_I CY 1 rl I LV'I`. U i I 1'V J. 1 •�r� 1V 'N'TERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACTIINES • CORPORATION By: -- Name: Title: 300 CONVENT STREET CORPORATION Hy - Name: Title: ACCEPTED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE BY: CITY OF SOUT I AKE By: • Name: Title: - • i a0s'_.1j5?3717101EA.*u0'13ISi 3 5D-18 • STATE OF - `r§ § COUNTY OF_ § This foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of_ ,1997, by of International Business Machines Corporation, a New York corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public in and for said County and State My Commission Expires_ • STATE OF § COUNTY OF This foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day f 1997, of 300 oConvrnt Street by Corporation, a Texas corporation,on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public in and for said County and State My Commission Expires: i • 4 l.+pa:.';.hP911 7.0l.pliro"f;l� 50.19 . . SCITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL RETREAT JUNE 10-11, 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Public Works Comprehensive CIP Update/ROW Issues Solona Capital Improvements Background On May 4, 1987,the City of Southlake and Maguire Thomas Partners/IBM(MTP/IBM)entered into a Utility Contract. The Utility Contract states that MTP/IBM will build certain water infrastructure in which the City reimburses MTP/IMB for those improvements, starting upon the connection of MTP/IBM to City water service. The infrastrucure that was established and paid for by MTP/IBM, was the Dove Street Elevated Water Storage Tank and an 18-inch water main along West Dove St. from North White Chapel Blvd. to just west of S.H. 114. The total cost to establish the water infrastructure was$849,255.40. Of that total reimbursement cost,the City currently owes MTP/IBM Sthe remaining balance of$839,151.90. The contract requires the City to reimburse MTP/IBM by reduced or no fees where appropriate and charging one-half of the City's water/wastewater charge upon connection to a City water supply. Discussion Currently, MTP/IBM receives water and wastewater services from Trophy Club MUD #1 through an interlocal agreement. To provide a water/wastewater connection to MTP/IBM, Southlake Public Works staff is preparing the"loop"of the N-1 Sewer Main for connection to the City's wastewater system and a 12-inch water main along the proposed Kirkwood Blvd. from West Dove St. to the existing Kirkwood Blvd. for connection to the City's water system. The 12-inch main is designed to be constructed along the alignment of the future Kirkwood Blvd. This water main will provide service to the IBM Building (Saber), northeast of S.H. 114. A contract with MTP/IBM for the construction of the 12-inch water line will be placed on Regular City Council Agenda for June 17, 1997. The following factors offer the City the opportunity to provide service connections to MTP/IBM. • MTP/IBM is in the process for approval of their final plat for Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I. (See attached exhibit.) The addition's water service plans are to connect to a water main on N. White Chapel Blvd. The new main on Kirkwood Blvd. will provide a"loop"or a second water line to the addition. The approved developer agreement allows for an estimated credit against the total due of$277,962. This credit includes items such as zoning and platting fees, construction inspection fees, impact fees and the cost of a sewer trunk line. (See attached III estimate.) 5D-20 • • The extension "loop" of the N-1 Sewer Main is to be awarded by Trinity River Authority (TRA) at their June 28, 1997 TRA Board Meeting. This extension will allow the N-1 Sewer Basin to gravity flow to the TRA Lift Station and allow removal of the IBM(Saber)Building from Trophy Club M.U.D.'s system and connection to Southlake sewer. Trophy Club MUD maintains that when the sewer service is switched, the water service should be also. Staff can not find this requirement in the interlocal agreement dated February 4, 1992. However, • Staff is developing an interlocal agreement with Trophy Club MUD #1 for access to their transmission main from Fort Worth to provide a water supply to Southlake's Pump Station No. 2 that is to be built on T.W. King Rd. (The following item in the Council Retreat will discuss this in detail.) The proposed agreement with MTP/IBM for the 12-inch water main will further reduce the City's obligation by an estimated $150,000. Therefore, the City's obligation remaining will be approximately $411,189.90 ($839,151.90 minus $277,962 minus $150,000). Capital Improvements in the framework of previous contracts and local agreements can be fairly complicated, however, the entire City water system will be greatly enhanced with the completion of the water(12-inch water main, Ground Water Storage Tank and Pump Station No. 2 and the 20- inch line to Dove Elevated Water Tower) and wastewater (N-1 Sewer Main Extension) improvements. • Attachments: Memorandum Rex Whitton dated April 30, 1996 Memorandum Richard Kuhlman dated August 22, 1995 Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, Final Plat y:W P.i 1LES COUNCIL'.RETREAT.19V CIP.SOL.WPC. • 5D-21 1114)i/,/ iE 50 c�rc1` Memorandum Westlake TX 76262 817 430-0303 817 430-8150 F'a.t Exhibit "D" date 4/30/96 to Bob Whitehead cc: Tom Allen Tony Canonaco of, zr Efrom Rex Whitton re Kirkwood Hollow- Offsetting Fee's Against Credit Listed below is our estimate of the fees that we would like to offset against the credit that the City owes. 1. Street light operation cost for 2 years at $12(estimated) per fixture per month times 15 fixtures $4,300 - • 2. Zoning change fees $3,860 3. Development plan and preliminary plat application fee $3,150 4. Final plat filing fee $2,420 5. Inspection fees (3% of the cost of water, street, drainage, and sewer based on our most current cost projections of$1,215,000) $36,450 6. Administrative processing fee (2% of the cost of water, street, drainage, and sewer based on our most current cost projections of $1,215,000) $24,300 7. Sewer and water impact fees at approx. $2,000 per lot times 70 lots $140,000 8. The cost of an 8" sewer line from the new Kirkwood lift station southwesterly along South Fork Kirkwood Branch Creek to an intersection with Kirkwood Blvd. in Phase I of the residential. This sewer line will actually be constructed as a 27" line. The City will pay for the difference between a 27" line and an 8" line (currently estimated at $65,396. The 8" portion will be offset against the credit $63,482 9. In lieu of paying a perimeter road fee based on linear foot of frontage and paying for critical storm drain structures based on the acreage in the drain area, we will pay an $1,100 per lot fee that will cover these two categories_ Based on 70 lots, our fee would be $77,000 which we cannot offset against the credit, but which cash payment will be used to resurface (this summer) Dove Rd. from White Chapel Blvd. to Hwy. 114. • 5D-22 r• - ",1110... • S0 Ctirde Snit 5 cite 0 0 7T�tJ.ake TX;6262 / SI7 430-0333 Memorandum VGA FAX date August 22, 1995 to Bob Goodwin cc: Tom Allen • y- frCrCI Richard KulilmanM2----- re Southlake Water Credit (the"Credit") Luann Heath and I have agreed in concept to the following reconciliation of cur SouthIake Water Contract credits: 1. Original investment $750,000.00 2. Additional investment for 18"water line extension 99,255.40 • 3. Reduction taken against Water (10,103.50) Impact fee in Developer's Agmt. • for Phase IA Net credit due from City $839,151.90 I have attached a copy of that Developer's Agreement dated.January 29, 1988. If you have any questions, please give me a ra11. Luann is drafting a letter for Curtis Hawk's signature setting forth the current status of the credit. RHKIth • I 5 D-23 r ..- 1 0- ,' �Qf:\..4:Ar:P'''' / I i f iannnmi1162 P i ;t xcnr�.r ... 1 ,IA.rbM11N st*I C a-Irk, f/ t• ___" JJ • • 1 1 ., _ ..._;,._•,V.,-''' 0.:, ‘-%, . . ....., , \ ,, •. ...r ...•„I .....,,•., ••• tir--------•---;..- ' x ,..., \ 1 �' •HMI w aluaww . .d i'� •` .L 1k,`ja / •�/ / .....x rl..a nas I• �' Y �.� o..♦.+row • � �-• [[(( �'w FA/sue,/{,,,`,�/ � . f' mil I.a..'WWI 11 fl.0. MCC 7W vlT 4•I:OT • 1[Dttl T'11 • 1 `/',J . •+_ tN �Ca 'Ott 3 a • ..I wasal" 1,544'J . i 1 I , • / .� 20 ice/ '- 1 1 �/ w i. . . / 11111 —�11_ ,vit t'•Y.• ..,..w ---. } • , �.. ralanl su.0 !'.i �.\at MMA• e...,... 1 V. l0�11. AIM MOD iIiii I. —- i _'�j%! � `� ;:; •-,: xiBxwpOD I�OIlAW nuM I }� a•1_1.1, _ 1 Y al^ 1ji'� J /rl 2.11222.01.4.11(020.1.1 aerr .•ors .{GIT.rUq i�'I�� RA�•i• a W rwr.•11.F•1 L.:.. .w / J�! lR 1A 11LN AI WA VI II j1 ..�...........�.��... ...e+.•w I. - a• W Ilu..kY A.••i.n MR An L fill1iItp ♦ �...... ....» _TWr .•.h.•. .war•i.....� Vamors .....Pa. .I...u•••.w.«oa' tick rao ., .'A .t, '• NIT♦.a1 RWC u a m KMM aOT,H4 K RED MAY 271997 . = u P'4.4 r 111 11.3 NurmQxuv� -.....T IW.. ..N'Mr-n Nat.r 1." r r City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 30, 1997 I TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Nona Whitehead, SPIN Coordinator SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-57, appointing Barry Friedman as representative for SPIN Neighborhood #13 As you know, Jim Goggin has moved from the area and his position as Standing Committee representative for Neighborhood #13 has been vacant since June 20. As a result, residents of the neighborhood were informed of the opening and a meeting was held on July 29, to select the new representative. Ultimately Barry Friedman was the resident willing to make the commitment. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have about this appointment. Please place the attached resolution appointing Mr. Friedman to fill the unexpired term previously occupied by Jim Goggin on the City Council agenda for the August 5, 1997 meeting. Ili NW City of Southlake,Texas 1111 RESOLUTION 97-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR THE SOUTHLAKE PROGRAM FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS (SPIN); PROVIDING FOR TERMS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that a citizen advisory committee would be of assistance to the City Council and City staff by providing a more available form of citizen participation in the affairs of the City and to create a forum for neighbor to neighbor communication; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has created such a committee by ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is to appoint one youth representative, as well as one epresentative for each of the designated neighborhoods from recommendations provided by their neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, vacancies occur when SPIN representatives decide to seek elective office and/or other board appointments and new appointments are required; now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The following is hereby appointed as neighborhood representative for the term specified: Neighborhood #13 Barry Friedman 1997 r City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 97-57 SPIN Appointment "'Page Two Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy 'ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary • 4 e 1 City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-074 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-247 Rezoning and Development Plan/Solana STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property described as approximately 485 acres, known as Solana and situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County, Texas. SLOCATION: South and West of State Highway No. 114, East of Precinct Line Road , and North of the Town of Westlake. OWNER/APPLICANT: International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, and Maguire Partners-Westlake Partnership CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "O-2"Office District,"C-3"General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. LAND USE CATEGORY: As yet undetermined CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: As yet undetermined NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) • RESPONSES: None .74 -i City of Southlake, Texas • P&Z ACTION: June 19, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table until the July 3, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. July 3, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997, with the following amendment: 1) the following "B-1" Business Service Park uses shall be permitted through a Specific Use Permit only: # 7 - Computer manufacture and research; # 9 - Electronic manufacture; #11 - Lithograph, engraving, printing & publishing; #12 - Manufacture of medical and dental equipment; #13 - Manufacture of musical instruments; #16 - Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing; #21 - Scientific&professional instrument manufacturing; #23 - Small parts manufacturing and assembly. COUNCIL ACTION: July 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 11, 1997, with the development plan and regulations as presented at the July 15, 1997 City Council meeting, and with the following amendment: 1) grant applicant's request to permit "computer research" without a Specific Use Permit. 41" STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 1997, and Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated August 1, 1997. Note that the applicant has complied with all the Commission's recommended manufacturing SUP's, but requests that #7, computer research, be a permitted use and be exempted from the SUP approval process. Please find the attached submittal dated July 11, 1997. The pages numbered "DR" will be incorporated into the final ordinance. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-074Z.WPD • OVYNER „Aim ..,.. -- .1 0 . ..• '``. r ,,_„ 1 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB .T:. 2 TOWN OF WESTLAKE ; _ • ' 3 MTP-IBM PHASE II&1I1 JV. 1-+ti -•: 4 STATE OF TEXAS •S l'.;. -`••'.<<•: 5 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE ..«.` '1•'t•'41 `).r • t 1 bo G IBM CORP. •�i:i A,<,<••Cl4YwrnY•,, 1{.•„.•, SPIN #2 MARTIN SCHELLING „•<s 4)`4)e% ;•,••s •e• o • Y•T•;t„ SPIN # 11 ROBERT HUTTON ifil )? .)•'>)� '♦ )•.•<;<,;''`<,`.'`'<>)`</`<�`<^r t— SPIN #12 DAVID BALTIMORE :1 <, i, ,7 ``-,t,•, >` Y` y ♦, . Zr,. , /,,,,,( „ 4n > ` 'r•TtSr�;.•i••'h._'••. ..1 ,.x:.�r.,i:• �j.�1�t`'!` ..j k •i~ .. 60•T IUI '— b, r n > ,•,` ,< ,< ,< < ,` ^ ' >• •' 4 n n C •,vy ,•• ' \ '.. ...t,•^••• • ..♦`• ••. ..Jt..:r.•1 •.. r ,• •r• •... \y < < C < < `• >`) ( C r \ " ) r' 1 1 r•:.N:'.,•..' ti.i•: ••\_ r•j.• /.: • •,1 (,tj...,r,, /r `< r • n `e ) ) ' ♦/ s ,/ 4 v• ♦/ , , / ♦i / /\/. .rY..-w+.'iir- `.L: v-•Y.1.,+-tC••"�t':'Y:`...t-••f'.-7-1' i,n^l•^.:.t 3. o. • �Jyf' 4 , '� w • -•a:•.y;;►!- ♦,-•„.,--•T j;. .-F-;..1• / ;c,< < ,., ^ PUD ffl • ••• - •,.....a:• : -,.)• .,.,;'..-: . + „ ,•\Y v••V' • •v4 )♦ •• ), /\,♦,♦ ,'\•t'• /' T )♦ • )\ /• ), )• ) ) ^' • 4 v i ,• l.l••./.iw. ii. .,.7.T.Z :77,..t: .•rj• • • 'I• • L✓\ < 4 ^ n n C ,' � �C.�. j�''rY •-. ` � ,. •Z •,1• •;a.'1I \•..: .... ..: `.;.:=': ,1 �� ,t,,. . 7 �J..-.i♦..� ./-ay. ,♦C ♦/ Y Y r 1 , �r )/`�.r7C.J 1I_ �\ C CY C ), ^1 • ! 1 -✓ • .. )::I ,;�:A , C7 'I:i , Y `, „ w r: i•' ,♦,♦ ♦ ♦ • •♦ ,• ) n i, ,• ), ,• ,\ )\ I• ) ) ^ , . ^,` a::i•. , ':••,'!•• 1,\:.:` ;, am: • ' o/ ,\ ,• ,` h,♦•(,♦a/ • i < 4 r ) ! ♦ Y V . ( \/ J •'' Y ♦/ •! •/ ♦( ♦C♦< \/ �\ ''1.' \: • :.• • a.•t':/•:. i 1.':1.: .••S): ♦ /, r ,, .( ,rnY , ,yi♦♦,S,<Y /<>,♦,(4V~\• `(Y\(y` A\•<Y•t♦•r)I't,i<,(>\i `, TTD ��. ... ..•.•.).,,,,;„..% -.:,* •.\:.t .•)'T:L• ..,,,v r v V `` Y r• ) )• v v( ♦' y/` '\( ♦ ♦ J ♦ i, `• • \•n )♦ ), ), •\ )♦ )♦rY Y r• //(r • )r. S F >t --•:. .y.•f •' � v •, ,+) ♦,l\•• .V i♦+( •• Y i 'f / i ," `• ,'/ ,♦ 1 •' ,f / / /♦. f!fl•l...i n:•ii •",, ti'r CJ • `C n / < )� ♦ r \ /• •C )t• �1•+k r.\•rft M •��• i :t S•••i`• c.•>•i, < ,, y` > ,• •, .,••< •, \, ,�•4 ♦ /♦ ♦ 41 Y ♦ )♦ ♦,< ♦ )•, ! �-• _i,r..• L ♦•. •a• ly lr. • li , ,/ •, , ♦ \• \, /♦• ♦ •4 4 ^ < 4 4 < n Y C < 1' . ) R-PUD - I .. •t l• • ..1.'.•};• 1 .....4. !. L < ,• )♦ , < /♦ > /♦ ( Y� Y •• V Y ( `/ ♦, ♦/ Y ♦/ • , ,/ ♦, f•-:.vl.;.,.• I.n'„1. •a. J t ,,. .;'(:, ). , ,C,• 4 < n )•▪n .<• •` / •♦ ,• )\ ,\ )• ) ) ,• /• Y w 1.) ` ) , ♦+ \• , 3 'S t `t r,.• . ,tt. 11 ' 1P/..-.:-.1•.:: ' T.,.... .. ••:••.....•• / •• r Y ) )'•• v , • •, • ` ♦ v♦, \,) ♦,w , • • 4 .< n ( < • - • '♦ n ^ 1 ^ ( ), )♦ 1, tii .t.: v.• • ':.'•: . .w.r• • • T' ii r( " `4 `'\n`i n*' A -` ,"<)•n♦,•n,C /• I ,•C ,♦ , 1:7.--7,. , C ,e r,i Y•/ ` ) ,r /4 < .` \ ' •••' )•t-: 'r•. - •••w.•: 60'T ica1--. J• T!C .',,( r \•,. 4 Y` ♦ r• % > r > b Y > , /♦ ,• ,♦ „ /\/ • ,1.1.••.••.: , r ^Y •r'1•.? Y, ., )T :!i 4 )• T ,♦i i' ^ ♦, •. , .; < ♦/ v ♦, `• ♦, Y ♦/ \ n /< 4 ,< ^ ), )♦•n n ,C A n n )• ), 1 i•':rv.s lJ•t.w/- ( r+.•� ✓. , �,.,:(: r ♦ ♦ ,\/ )•\ 1• , /\,♦/♦ ,"• ,♦ •• ,•' ) ,� Y ), Y Y •< ( Y ) r y r Y 4 .• 1• •it• ••••. ••• •••'• •.\ i1.. 'r.. , <,, .,<r>\ •`v (vr /•r ♦ ,I /• •< )• /. ^ /. t /.' )• r w 1♦ y\ )• )'♦ •• i' •)' •♦' •< N'• •• i• / •♦•• •r :•♦ ). .':•:iJ);;.,.••t• :1.)4•. f,' .rl� n. \, ♦,'C ,( >♦ < ; > r • /• r r v > ,• •^ v v C •\ C ^ 4 /s ) )• v • n n n (•) ♦ • ).:./.:•.1:./.:'t`C 1' .. • •7 i •.I;j'Y�•,.t.. �'..,,C n r ( , v , •/ •/ ♦. •/ r ♦/ ♦, ♦, ` ♦, '•' ..ram:. .•:• .'.. •••.:,,.. \ It)• r •rA\,n-. ♦ ^r,♦4n• )Yn. . A• A A )♦ n>^rn)•••w••y`<n`,^•.• /\ )♦•♦•• •• \ >•i •< •• r• •••< ••0•♦i♦, �' y.•.,•':a•;♦. i� .:11 {{pp I• Y 1. Y Y .t v \ Y e' ,\ /\ '''' NR-PUD 1e.1` . -••.. ••• 1.•' .. : lo: t.: ; y,,,+:«,, '"' ); v v ♦/ v y` `• / '•( `• " y 5. 5, •. 1•s..1:..:,•':• ,: •.::r,•11.-- t,:1 UV 1i r \,•♦/ ♦, .,- I v ♦, • •4 1444>♦,>♦,)),• ))``>" • ••+:, w4n.1•.:-•:w.••a•..'; W1. tir:• ate..-t.-+: 1 >♦ n >„( n ^ n •\ n ` i C ( C Y < . t • \:a.•1`i•'J 11� G / ' •( Y• ,•,r V Y Y r Y, \ / , , / , Y •.Ir•\.::•::,.A•rit:•. 1I. `\, I,•.,.• ..`• .. SO Typical l�, .• / •, •, •• \. \ ^Y4 ,♦ • ) i )•, •••.:_, n�,.:-•,i•'• •.^: -.-•.. . t: _._..T_ •-._a._-•.�.._._....-......7.s'r.•1-.:+ .'S...S ,♦ ♦ • �, • \•\ i',r ;.+7 •J i:.•'i..• ^• .y•1, .1 • e• r • .. ETJ 6 5 '{ �'•'=�~,4 • 6 6 6 = NR-PUD r •,••• 1 •1.1LO7 •• .,..w. TRACT MAP and :;...•...,: �;. ,• '.:. . ,. :., -�.•1 >,, p •. •'r1,.i;•• .:�.,...••...:.:.:::. r•a.•:\v•,•:;^. fi t.� • •,l• .:Y ;•ADJACENT OWNERS . - : " , \ 1.1_,.... s. X -, .i • .., •ANDZ • ONIN • II1\ I; •.1. •• t ' .:i. • y:. • .•. ! +: ; • i• 7- • j•.:,• �• ; : % ':•• , �jl City of Southlake,Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY likase No.: ZA 97-074 Review No: Three Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Development Plan for NR-PUD Zoning of Solana APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership Huitt-Zollars, Inc. 9 Village Circle, Suite 500 3131 McKinney Avenue. Suite 600 Roanoke. Texas 76262 Dallas, Texas 75204 Phone: (817) 430-0303 Phone: (214) 871-3311 Fax: (817) 430-8750 Attn: Tom Allen Fax: (214) 871-0757 Attn: Ocie Vest CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. * The applicant has met the requirements of previous reviews. No review of proposed signs is intended with this development plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97074DP3.W PD • -7A -Li • • • . S ••••t tip A • , 1 0-- --11611,411111 r --__,..--___, s1 u— /. .......... C\ �"'v7 \:- FUTUIE o�va.o�ran FUTURE YHAPAENT A • I� w� r , Arsva®RC.-R®B11.5rtw®LAIR oE1av,B dy ti , oa. a+w..n.er Lo�.�al.a a ALL apo.I A.L aax I 231 . _.. _ _. - - .Sn..i/,OUM M 010..r.0�LRKK.W • ,i 1 � - __--- \ \; .+ r i As,,..s.ln.rK.: (.RRKn, (uo.m.) .__ .\ .1 ORM ACK.Q..T I.L ROTA, 41,1" • .•.... y I , r- l,/4' NY/SG/..auY IM ♦ I I.MaMIA.na.RGMO..a YII.WIx H.a. FoR p �� (b 4 ff 1 r �"""a.s.I4�..) .a.S.I...w Sr.a.A......ROOS M1n+(M/ ;..... U`V }{f- u:71 \\� Sua-ran usr I:m 004304 MA a.ROAD r co.m.wa pV al.c.s• \/ t 1 `l + CAAPl18 CIRCLE arTAr..n.a.M...+ow.R use AND uNDSCAPIRL �� : �� , ) r 7• I �_ ' .I A ie �--+ 1 M r.urtRn a Ms rnw M COMM C (j �n .aYM.w i PA.. �\ V. .1.,afnKr. �� [_'�.. . ,.\ �:(.:...� 11 - (�1•,. >v.� -\ �� \� aw.110.11 O.RRrw..wi.wsr.Ru.03 n ',tit I _ 1 1 v1 � �' f� ��,. wK,.aL.,�,, z d z_ j / ' ' g 10 nR Rawa RM.rM..aal \\ J-)) \ ' .----- . 3.323 T�Q�OLOOY P WO AFAFK I., I I�11 / ..�A YV R4.°/:J \ n.at OM 30.00,L TX TOM i]o-Nul RA.. 1 W.aR! RRO.a.a8�� - ) • K MORAL Fs 2.262 -min-,,,,/,1i i L--Orr n so,,. - - -- '.V..... .. ♦♦\ Arrc 15.H.11 csn.rl rKna..r M.o-rP l__"- R forma oR¢[ n O.rM.rR1M LTA —__—__—__- s.— ♦\ -.\ 14 ROARCKL n1RSR, CAMPUS CIRCLE - 75.2 ACRES I LAM uY ....NOW ROM META - a,12 W,m HUI e-f1ORs 0 1r. ory rc,w M.. ,. . e.oeE� Ia�NM Mx. f-STOMAS 24f000 SR mw a R A� ``: '' A Cr,R.. f-STOMAS 114000>r. ....wwa r'.7 = P....M.r O.OIn: —fRC[S � EE �V� r\-\\\ AAA f1 1RV SILAGE LLACE CARTER - 62.1 ACRES ♦♦�_---- ___.____ u.0.II .K ba.r FILM MIA .. u•GwR 'p p w^.I9 . -3201.1 000 1.r AV • V R 1 1RRK1 221000 5E. V \ .....r.RR.um:�_v.u, i Y I• C PARR CIRCLE - 22.0 ACRES b b • r L..0.a ..A;WOW M.o 0 G I '7 ��� ana ,-f.ORcf f2o.0o0, —I SQORA SPORTS CLUB - )S.I ACRES 4 °S`R.022 ` FLOORFLOOR�' S O L A N A `a ER a. STOWS .10n S.F. 07/11/97 FRI 14:26 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners Z 002 • SOLANA REC'D J U L 111997 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • PERMITTED USES • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (PARCEL A) • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (PARCEL B) • DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOLANA • • �ly� � , 07/11/97 FRI 14:26 FAX 317 430 8750 MagulrePartners WI 003 TA8 I SNON-RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. ZONING REQUEST This Non-residential P.U.D. Zoning Request (the "zoning request") is made on the 27th day of May 1997 by Maguire/Thomas Partners - Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership and International Business Machines Corporation. This zoning request seeks a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Solana. Solana is a Mixed-Use Business Campus providing diverse land uses to corporate tenants and their guests since 1988. Solana is only partially complete. Expansion of Solana will occur to existing Solana buildings and on vacant Solana land while maintaining the beautiful Solana Campus concept, This zoning request will address land use categories, development regulation and other requirements which (i) acknowledge the existing building improvements status and (ii) provide for future developments, both within the existing buildings areas and on currently vacant land. PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES The Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning request will divide Solana into two (2) separate parcels and will allow the following land use categories for each: PARCEL A (Location of Existing Improvements) • • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 0-2 Office District (Sec. 19) • C-3 General Commercial District (Sec. 22) • B-1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) PARCEL B (Currently Vacant) • CS - Community Service District (Sec.8) • 0-2 - Office District (Sec. 19) • C-3 - General Commercial District (Sec. 22) • B-1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) S DR-2 7 -7 , 07/11/97 FRI 14:26 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners V1004 • PERMITTED USES The Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the zoning categories identified in this document (as established in the City of Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended) and shall specifically include those uses described as: • "Permitted Uses" • "Accessory Uses" • "Specific Use Permits" • "Special Exception Uses" • Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not been defined by current technology shall be subject to approval criteria established in Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 44.4, as amended. LAND USES There are exceptions to the permitted uses. Those uses identified with a double asterisk (**) shall require a Specific Use Permit (SUP). • will not be permitted. Sexually oriented businesses CS - Community Service District I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) A. Is B. Higher education institutions C. Museums, libraries, fine arts center, and similar cultural facilities D. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs (No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges) E. Institutions, rehabilitation and training centers. P. Public safety facilities G. H. Religious institutions I, City Hall or other municipal office uses • D R-3 /7.] _ ;r , 07;11/97 FRI 14:27 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners !005 • 0-2 Office District I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 1. Accounting and tax preparation 2. Adjustment and collection services 3. Advertising agencies 4. Architecture 5. Banking 6. Bill paying services 7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only) 8. Business holding and investment services 9. Chamber of Commerce 10. Chiropractors 11. Computer services 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting • 13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted) 14. Dentists 15. Duplication and mailing services 16. Employment services 17. Engineering 18. Finance 19. Interior design 20. Land surveying 21. Law 22. Management consultants 23. Optometrists 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including the retail sale, fabrication, manufacture or production of goods or merchandise 25. Physicians 26. Podiatrists • 27. Psychiatrists 28. Psychologists DR-4 , 07/11.97 FRI 14:27 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners 006 • 29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios 30. Real estate and insurance 31. Savings and Loan 32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices 33. Stenographic services 34. Title companies 35. Travel bureaus or services 36. Utility offices B. Community Facility Uses 1. Public, semi-public and private parks 2. Recreation and open space 3. Libraries 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) • 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character C. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex. • DR-5 '/1 —10 07/11/97 FRI 14:27 FAX 817 430 ,8750 MagulrePartners (?1007 • C-3 General Commercial District I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) 1. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District and in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District (see attached) 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas 3. Cleaning, dyeing and pressing works; laundry and washaterias 4. Coin and stamp shops 5. 6. Commercial art galleries 7. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 8. Department stores 9. Dry goods and notion stores 10. Eioctrical and gas appliances and supply sales, repair and installation services 11 , Hardware, paint and wallpaper stores • 12. Hat shops 13. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums 14. Hobby shops 15. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances 16. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 17. Medical care facilities 18, Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers (excluding cemeteries, crematories and mausoleums) 19. Music or record shops 20. Nursery buildings 21. Pet shops 22. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies 23. 24. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs 25. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work 26. S DR-6 , 07;11/97 FRI 14:28 FAX 817 430 8750 xagulrePartners Z 008 " 27. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises• consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use permit (excluding sexually oriented businesses) 28. Toy stores 29. Upholstery shops - furniture 30. Variety stores By SUP only B. Accessory Uses 1. Permitted accessory uses shall be in accordance with the C-3 district. In addition, the following accessory uses shall be permitted: a. Outdoor dining and seating areas b. Street furniture, urban design fixtures and streetscope components III S DR-7 /A— / , 07/11i97 FRI 14:28 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners Z 009 SC-1 Neighborhood Commercial District I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) A. Commercial Uses 1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including fabrication, manufacture or production of goods 2. Bakeries, provided that the floor area of the bakery operation shall not exceed 2,000 square feet 3. Barber and beauty shops 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or laundromats, provided that the floor area of the business does not exceed 2,500 square feet 5. 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets provided that the floor area of the business activity shall not exceed 3,000 square feet 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores provided that the floor area does not exceed 2,500 square feet of space • 8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or take-out food establishments, provided that the floor area of such operation does not exceed 2,000 square feet 9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops to include tailor activities that create custom made clothing and accessories B. Community Facility Uses 1. Public, semi-public and private parks 2. Recreation and open space 3. Libraries 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character • DR-8 07/11;97 FRI 14:23 FAX 317 430 3750 Ma&ulrePartners lih 010 C-2 Local Retail Commercial District, • I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) 1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District 3. Antique Shops 4. Bakeries designed for retail sales rather than wholesale operation 5. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops 6. Blueprinting or photostatting 7. Book or stationery stores to include large newsstands 8. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers, such as stenographers, executive secretaries, etc. 9. Christmas tree sales beginning one week before Thanksgiving and extending through December 31st of each calendar year (outdoor display permitted) 10. Cigar or tobacco stores 11. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats, providing • that the floor area does not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet for separate or combined uses 12. Confectionery stores 13. Custom dress making or millinery shops 14. Dancing schools 15. Day nurseries 16. Delicatessen shops without size limitations 17. Dog and cat hospitals or small animal hospitals 18. Drug stores 19. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed eight thousand (8,000) square feet 20. Duplicating service, printing, lithography, mimeographing multi-graphing and offset printing, providing that the floor area does not exceed two thousand (2,000) square feet 21. tore 22. Financial institutions 23. Florist or gift shops • 24. DR-9 07/11/97 FRI 14:29 FAX 817 430 8750 Ma$ulrePartners Z 011 1110 25. Grocery stores and meat markets 26. Health service facilities 27. Jewelry stores 28, Leather and leather good shops, providing that the floor area does not exceed two thousand (2,000) square feet for separate or combined uses. 29. Optical goods 30. Photographs, portrait or camera shops and photofinishing 31. Radio and television sales and servicing 32. Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and "take out food restaurant 33. Shoe repair services 34. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair 35. Tailor, clothing and wearing apparel shops without size restruction 36. , 37. Variety stores, provided that the floor area of such facility does not exceed ten thousand (10,000) square feet • • D R-10 07/11/97 FRI 14:29 FAX H17 450 3750 MagulrePartners 1012 B-1 Business Service Park District 1110 I. Permitted Uses - (Abbreviated from Zoning Ordinance) A. Office and Commercial Uses 1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District 2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations 3. 4. Banks 5. Barber and beauty shops 6. Book and stationery stores *** 7. Computer manufacture and research 7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex 8. ** 9. Electronic manufacture 10. Funeral homes III '* 11. Lithograph, engraving, printing and publishing ** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment ** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments 14. Medical clinics 15. Nursery yards or buildings ** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing 17. Private schools 18. Professional/business schools 19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex 20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure ** 21 . Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing 22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters) ** By SUP only *** Computer Manufacture by SUP only• DR-11 7 — h 07/11/97 FRI 14:29 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners 14E1 013 • '* 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly 24. Studios for training in fine arts By SUP only B. Community Facility Uses 1. City Hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) • • DR-12 7A -I �; 07211/97 FRI 14:30 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners C U14 • "HC" Hotel District I. Permitted Uses - A. Hotels and motels B. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned C. Golf courses which are privately owned D. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) II. Accessory Uses - A. Permitted accessory uses shall be in accordance with the HC district. In addition, the following accessory uses shall be permitted: 1. Outdoor dining and seating areas 2. Street furniture, urban design fixtures and streetscape components • • DR-13 07/11/97 FRI 14:30 FAX 817 430 8750 MaguirePartners 1 015 6 3 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Parcel A is the portion of Solana which contains existing building improvements. Future expansion in Parcel A is contemplated including, but not limited to, increasing the size of the Marriott Hotel, expansions of existing retail buildings, construction of future retail buildings, construction of future office buildings and parking additions. The building improvements previously constructed in Parcel A were designed and built under zoning regulations which differ, in some ways, from the current Zoning Ordinance 480. Parcel B is currently undeveloped. It is intended that development within Parcel B be accomplished within similar design parameters for buildings, landscaping, site planning, etc. I. The following exceptions from the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480 are within Parcel A: A. Height Si. Building Height a. No building housing HC Zoning shall exceed seven (7) stories. b. No building housing B-1 zoning shall exceed three (3) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. 2. Parking Structures - No parking structures shall exceed four (4) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. 3. Architectural Features - Architectural features (not intended for human occupancy) which are integral to the architectural style of the building (including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, feature walls and similar features) may not exceed the height limits of this section by more than twenty (20) feet. 4. Mechanical Equipment/Penthouses, Ventilation Equipment, Antennas, Cooling Towers, etc. - These ancillary uses shall not exceed the actual height of the building by more than twenty (20) feet. • DR-14 ' (J 07)11/97 FRI 14:30 FAX 817 430 3750 MagulrePartners IQU18 • B. Building Setbacks - HC Zoning - The Marriott Hotel is constructed directly adjacent to the adjoining Village Center lot line on substantially three sides. This allows the Hotel to be integrated directly into the balance of the Village Center. The Marriott's porte-cochere projects a total of fifteen feet over the adjacent Village Center lot. This fifteen foot projection occurs for a length of approximately seventy feet. 1. Front Yard: Zero (0'). 2. Side Yard: Zero (0'). 3. Rear Yard: Zero (0'). 4. Front Yard at Public Streets: Fifty (50') feet. C. Floor Area - 0-2, C-3 Zoning - Each store, shop or business shall have a minimum of two hundred (200) square feet of rentable floor area. D. Parking 1. Parking Spaces - The following parking spaces are currently provided within Parcel A: a. Westlake Campus Garage 1,875 • Surface - 625 Computer - 100 Total 2,600 b. Village Center (Fully mixed-use) Parking Garage (A&B) - 850 Surface Lots - Retail - 187 Trellis Area - 82 Surface Lots - Solana Club - 316 Total 1,435 2. Parking Space Sizes - a. Minimum of 7.5' x 16' - Compact. b. Standard size - 8.5' x 18' c. No more than 35% of spaces will consist of compact spaces. E. Buffer Yards 1. No buffer yard will be required with public street setbacks of 50 feet or greater. 2. In cluster-type development, no buffer yards will be required so long as equivalent open space and plantings normally provided by bufferyards • along common lot lines is provided elsewhere with the two lots. DR-15 _ l�j 07/11/97 FRI 14:31 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners 4 017 • F. Landscaping Due to Solana's unique landscape design, the landscape palette will be consistent with the existing developed areas of Solana. Landscaping design will be submitted and approved at the site plan phase of development. G. Off-Street Loading - With the following exceptions, off-street loading shall be provided pursuant to Section 36 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480: 1. The minimum dimension of loading spaces shall be as follows: 10' x 25' regular size space 10' x 50' large space 2. The calculation of the minimum number of off-street loading spaces shall be in conformance with the following schedules and rules regarding shared spaces: a. Number of spaces: Office Uses or portion of building devoted to office uses: 0 - 49,999 sf 0 spaces 50,000 - 149,999 sf 1 regular space 150,000 - 249,999 sf 2 regular spaces • 250,000 sf and up 2 regular spaces and 1 large space Retail and Restaurant Uses with the fo1Iowinq building size: 0 - 9,999 sf 0 spaces 10,000 - 49,999 sf 1 regular space 50,000 - 99,999 sf 1 regular space and 1 large space b. Loading spaces that are adjacent and accessible to several buildings, including buildings on separate lots, shall be allowed to fulfill the loading requirements for the individual buildings provided that i) the number of spaces satisfies the requirements for the combined square footages for the buildings in question, and ii) for loading spaces to be shared among separate lots, an agreement evidencing the right of Owners to the use of such spaces shall be provided. • DR-16 — aLi 07i11!97 FRI 14: 31 FAX 817 430 8750 ManulrePartners 'A018 • F. Release from Section 43, Overlay Zone Solana (Parcel A) is a mixed-use campus development designed with contemporary planning and design methods. Solana's designers utilized large meadows and groves of existing trees as natural buffers. Large setbacks were utilized in some areas while narrow, and in some cases, no setbacks were used in other areas. The innovative design style of Solana does not mirror the traditional design style of residential areas of Southlake, Texas but the Solana design style does meet the purpose and intent of the Corridor Overlay Zone Requirements of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, as amended by Ordinance No. 480-C, and as further amended by Ordinance No. 480-S, and which may be amended in the future (the "Corridor Overlay Zone Requirements"). The design style of Solana meets the intent of the Corridor Overlay Zone requirements by providing buildings and plazas which encourage retail and institutional uses and by providing destination activities such as employment and retail centers. Solana reflects comprehensive planning and elements of uniform urban design. Solana meets the purpose of the Corridor Overlay Zone Requirements by providing consistent development of office, retail and commercial areas along a major traffic corridor through the City of Southlake and standards which enhance the visual image of the corridors while maintaining traffic safety. • Parcel A shall not be subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone requirements as defined in Section 43 of Ordinance 480, as amended. However, Solana, as a participant in the development of the Corridor Overlay Zone criteria, commits to upholding the purpose and intent of these requirements. Solana will continue to be a comprehensively planned mixed-use business center which complements the high quality residential areas of the City. Solana's innovative style includes concepts of clustered buildings with generous spaces surrounding them, distinctive and liberal landscaping, quality construction methods and materials, sensitive screening, etc. By use of these elements, Solana accomplishes the goals of the Corridor Overlay Zone in its own distinctive style. • DR-17 07/11/97 FRI 14:32 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners 22 (_Z�.019 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Parcel B is currently undeveloped. II. The following exceptions from the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480 are within Parcel B: A. Height 1. Building Height - No building housing B-1 zoning shall exceed three (3) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. 2. Parking Structures - No parking structure shall exceed four (4) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. 3. Architectural Features - Architectural features (not intended for human occupancy) which are integral to the architectural style of the building (including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, feature walls and similar features) may not exceed the height limits of this section by more than twenty (20) feet. 4. Mechanical Equipment/Penthouses, Ventilation Equipment, Antennas, Cooling Towers, etc. - These ancillary uses shall not exceed the actual • height of the building by more than twenty (20) feet. B. Parking 1. Parking space sizes a. Minimum of 7.5' x 16' - Compact b. Standard size - 8.5' x 18' c. No more than 25% of spaces will consist of compact spaces. C. Buffer Yards 1. No buffer yard will be required with public street setbacks of 50 feet or greater. 2. In cluster-type development, no buffer yards will be required between like uses. D. Landscaping Due to Solana's unique landscape design, the landscape palette will be consistent with the existing developed areas of Solana. Landscaping design will be submitted and approved at the site plan phase of development. • DR-18 I - , � 0T/11!97 FRI 14:32 FAX 817 430 8750 MagulrePartners Z 020 • E. Corridor Overlay District Parcel B shall not be subject to the Corridor Overlay zone requirements as defined in Section 43 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Solana will continue to be a comprehensively planned, mixed-use business center which complements the high quality residential areas of the City. Solana's innovative style includes concepts of clustered buildings with generous spaces surrounding them, distinctive and liberal landscaping, quality construction methods and materials, sensitive screening, etc. By continued use of these elements, Solana accomplishes the goals of the Corridor Overlay Zone in its own distinctive style. F. Off-Street Loading - With the following exceptions, off-street loading shall be provided pursuant to Section 36 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480: 1. The minimum dimension of loading spaces shall be as follows: 10' x 25' regular size space 10' x 50' large space 2. The calculation of the minimum number of off-street loading spaces shall be in conformance with the following schedules and rules regarding shared spaces: • a. Number of spaces: Office Uses or portion of building devoted to office uses: 0 - 49,999 sf 0 spaces 50,000 - 149,999 sf 1 regular space 150,000 - 249,999 sf 2 regular spaces 250,000 sf and up 2 regular spaces and 1 large space Retail and Restaurant Uses with the following building size: 0 - 9,999 sf 0 spaces 10,000 - 49,999 sf 1 regular space 50,000 - 99,999 sf 1 regular space and 1 large space b. Loading spaces that are adjacent and accessible to several buildings, including buildings on separate lots, shall be allowed to suffice for the loading requirements for the individual buildings provided that i) the number of spaces satisfies the requirements for the combined square footages for the buildings in question, and ii) for loading spaces to be shared among separate lots, an • agreement evideicing the right of Owners to the use of such spaces shall be provided. DR-19 /L' cL S CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-247 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 485 ACRES KNOWN AS SOLANA SITUATED IN THE U.P. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015; T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107; THE J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134; THE C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510; THE W. MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1958,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS;WILLIAM PEA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2025, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, THE SAME BEING ABSTRACT NO. 1045, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND THE J. HENRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 724, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, THE SAME BEING ABSTRACT NO. 528, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A MIXED USE BUSINESS COMPLEX, KNOWN AS SOLANA, TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING USES: "0-2" OFFICE DISTRICT,"C-3"GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, AND "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter • 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 1 -7n —��� S authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of Spublic health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, S WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 2 //^\ -- S of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being an approximately 485 acre tract of land, known as Solana, and situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134;the C.M. Throop Survey,Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County, Texas, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated III herein,from"AG" Agricultural District to "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District,and "HC" Hotel District, as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, S water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.W PD Page 3 Sparticular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to S such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR SATTEST: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 4 —] CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY • EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-247.W PD Page 5 111 EXHIBIT "A" Being all that property, commonly known as Solana and more particularly described as Parcels "A", "B", "C" and "D" as follows: Parcel "A" Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. PARCEL "B" Being a 232.921 acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number S528, Denton County, Texas; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 1958, Tarrant County, Texas and the C. M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County, Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of rand embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume 7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, all in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, all in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess", found in the Southerly right-of-way of State Highway 114 (variable width), being the most Northerly Northwestern corner of said tract of land recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and the Northeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to R. Chandler as recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; THENCE along the southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway 114, the following courses and distances: S 71° 03'21" E, 3458.57 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found for the beginning of a curve to the right; • Along said curve an arc distance of 888.33 feet, through a central angle of 27° 21' 59", having a radius of 1859.86 feet, and a long chord of S 57° 22' 21" E, 879.91 feet to a L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.W PD Page 6 A---)'I 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; • S 25° 37' 35" W, 108.86 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found for the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Along said non-tangent curve an arc distance of 196.55 feet, through a central angle of 06° 15' 25", having a radius of 1799.86 feet, and a long chord of S 39° 40' 08" E, 196.46 feet to a concrete Texas Highway Department monument found; S 36° 32' 25" E, 215.14 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; THENCE leaving said right-of-way, West, 2141.45 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; THENCE S 52° 00' 00" W, 1000.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess: found; THENCE South, 1882.23 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found in the north line of that certain tract of land conveyed to Howard Dudley, et ux, as recorded in Volume 4888, Page 622, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89° 57' 44" W, 200.93 feet to a 1-inch iron rod found for the northwest • corner of said Dudley tract, also being in the south line of said IBM tract as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00° 20' 49" E, 45.01 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; THENCE N 89° 39' 10" W, along the north line of Roanoke Dove Road (variable width), 1346.51 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found for the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a variable width right-of-way the following courses and distances: Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 241.85 feet, through a central angle of 89° 45' 10", having a radius of 154.38 feet, and a long chord of Cart_ 46' 35" W, 217.86 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamp & Burgess" found; N 00° 06' 00" E, 977.90 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; • N 00° 08' 31" W, 394.37 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess found: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 7 -7/1- - N 00° 10' 13" W, 551.67 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; III ° 1/2-inch found; N 02 20' 32" E, 554.17 feet to a 1/� inch iron rod fo , N 28° 49' 02" E, 164.88 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; N 23° 30' 55" E, 98.16 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; N 12° 46' 54" E, 100.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; N 00° 16' 18" W, 993.50 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found for the southwest corner of the aforementioned R. Chandler tract; THENCE N 89° 47' 00" E along the southerly line of said R. Chandler tract, 258.02 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found; THENCE N 00° 30' 28" W along the easterly line of said R. Chandler tract, 505.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 232.921 acres of land, more or less. S _ SAVE AND EXCEPT: That portion conveyed to the State of Texas by Donation Deed dated October 7, 1991, recorded in Volume 3120, Page 294, Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described metes and bounds as follows: BEING a 23.167 acres of land, more or less, of which 16.06 acres are situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract 1045, Denton County, Texas; 6.64 acres are situated in the J. Henry Survey, Abstract 529, Denton County, Texas; 0.19 of an acre is situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1588, Denton County, Texas; 0.27 of an acre is situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; and 0.011 of an acre is situated in the C. M. Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, Tarrant County, Texas; said 23.167 acres of land being out of that certain 232.921 acre tract of land conveyed to MTP-IBM Phase II and III Joint Venture by Deed recorded in Volume 2190, Page 636, Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and as recorded in Volume 8995, Page 1268, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said 23.167 acres of land being hereinafter designated as "Parts 1 and 2" individually described by metes and bounds as follows: Part 1 - 22.884 acres, Denton County COMMENCING at a 5/8-inch iron rod found with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" being • an angle point in the Westerly property line of said 232.921 acre tract of land and being in the Easterly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road; L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 8 L I � ' THENCE along the Westerly property line of said 232.931 acre tract of land as follows: IIINorth 00° 17' 11" W also along said easterly right-of-way line for a distance of 993.63 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" being the southwestern property corner of that tract of land conveyed to Rhonda C. Decker- Chandler by Deed as recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; North 89° 46' 50" E for a distance of 258.05 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found with yellow cap found stamped "Carter & Burgess" being the southeastern property corner of said Decker-Chandler tract; North 00° 30' 24" W for a distance of 186.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING in the new southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE North 00° 30' 24" W continuing along said westerly property line for a distance of 318.96 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" being in the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 and the most northerly northwestern property corner of said 232.921 acre tract of land; THENCE along the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 as follows: South 71° 03' 52" E for a distance of 2997.68 feet; • South 18° 48' 09" W for a distance of 26.95 feet to the beginning of anon-tangent curve to the right; In a southeasterly direction along said non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 2790.79 feet, a central angle of 20° 29' 08", an arc distance of 997.82 feet, a beginning tangent bearing of S 71° 11' 51" E, and a chord which bears South 60° 57' 17" E, a distance of 992.51 feet; _ South 18° 51' 57" E for a distance of 129.64 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; In a southeasterly direction along said non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 2754.79 feet, a central angle of 03° 09' 06", an arc distance of 151.53 feet, a beginning tangent bearing of S 55° 17' 05" E, and a chord which bears South 53 degrees 42 minutes 32" E, a distance of 151.51 feet to a point in the approximate Denton/Tarrant County Line; North 89° 54' 28" W departing said existing southerly right-of-way line for a distance of 83.98 feet to a point in the new southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114; 41, THENCE along the new southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 as follows: 54° North 1� 43" W for a distance of 15.80 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 9 7/\, the left; • In a northwesterly direction along said curve to the left having a radius of 2709.79 feet, a central angle of 08° 19' 09", an arc distance of 393.45 feet, and a chord which bears North 58° 25' 17" W, a distance of 393.10 feet to the point of tangency of said curve to the left; North 62° 34' 51" W for a distance of 404.34 feet; North 71° 04' 03" W for a distance of 1443.85 feet; North 77° 26' 38" W for a distance of 746.74 feet; North 71° 04' 04" W for a distance of 254.55 feet; South 60° 05' 54" W for a distance of 62.42 feet; South 18° 55' 56" W for a distance of 30.00 feet; North 71° 04' 03" W for a distance of 120.00 feet; North 18° 55' 57" E for a distance of 30.00 feet; North 29° 05' 49" W for a distance of 52.33 feet; North 80° 54' 13" W for a distance of 234.54 feet; North 71° 04' 03" W for a distance of 100.00 feet; • North 49° 15' 58" W for a distance of 107.70 feet; North 63° 05' 01" W for a distance of 144.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing an area of 22.884 acres of land, more or less. PART 2 - 0.283 of an acre, Tarrant County COMMENCING at a 5/8-inch iron rod found with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" being an angle point in the southerly property line of said 232.921 acre tract of land; THENCE North 89° 59' 37" E along said southerly property line for a distance of 2132.66 feet to a point in the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 and being the most easterly property corner of said 232.921 acre tract of land; THENCE along the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 as follows: • In a northwesterly direction following a curve to the left having a radius of 2754.79 feet, a central angle of 02° 13' 52" an arc distance of 107.27 feet, a beginning tangent bearing L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 10 7 n - of North 42° 08' 23" W, and a chord which bears North 43° 15' 19" W, a distance of 107.26 feet; S North 64° 20' 22" W for a distance of 56.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING being in the new southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE North 54° 15' 43" West along said new southerly right-of-way line for a distance of 383.44 to a point in the approximate Denton/Tarrant County Line; THENCE South 89° 54' 28" East departing said new southerly right-of-way line for a distance of 83.98 feet to a point in the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 being in the arc of a curve to the right; THENCE along the existing southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 114 as follows: In a southeasterly direction along said curve to the right having a radius of 2754.79 feet, a central angle of 04° 26' 41", an arc distance of 213.71 feet, a beginning tangent bearing of South 52° 07' 59" E, and a chord which bears South 49° 54' 38" E, a distance of 213.65 feet; South 36° 29' 48" East for a distance of 107.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing an area of 0.283 of an acre of land, more or less. FURTHER SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Texas by Deed filed S August 18, 1987, recorded in Volume 2222, Page 273, Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and recorded in Volume 9006, Page 952, Tarrant County Records,Tarrant County, Texas. PARCEL "C" Being all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 (also known as West T.W. King Road), a variable width roadway, said point also being on the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114, a variable width roadway; Thence along the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114, N 36° 32' 30" W, 587.00 feet; • Thence leaving the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114 as follows: N 53° 29' 00" E, 546.74 feet, • S 03° 07' 00" W, 344.50 feet to a point in the centerline of County Road 3088. N 89° 28' 00" W, 25.00 feet to the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088, said right- L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 11 7 of-way also being the westerly limits of the City of Southlake, Thence along the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 and the westerly limits • of the City of Southlake, S 00° 33' 00" W, 514.80 feet, Thence S 72° 03' 00" W, 47.70 feet to the Point Of Beginning and containing 3.9419 acres, more or less, save and except any right-of-way dedications to the State of Texas for State Highway No. 114. PARCEL "D" BEING a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015, and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of the J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, Tarrant County, Texas, a 1/2 inch iron rod in the northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114 (a 220 foot wide right-of-way); THENCE along the said northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114, N 36° 32' 00" W, continuing along a projection of said R.O.W. to a point for a corner in the centerline of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road), said point being in the common boundary line between Westlake and Southlake and described in the City of Westlake Ordinance #81; THENCE South with the projected center line of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) (Peytonville Road) to a point for a corner in the southwest R.O.W. line of S.H. 114; THENCE Southeast along the southwest R.O.W. of S.H. 114 a distance of approximately 2,796.55 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the southeast corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M. recorded in V. 7422 P. 2157, DRTCT as described in ordinance #447 city limits of the City of Westlake, said point also being the southeast corner of Lot 1R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388- 214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 88° 29' 50" W along the south line of said I.B.M. Tract 907.75 feet to a point for a corner, said corner being the N.E. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M, V. 7824, P. 2033, DRTCT; THENCE S 00° 17' 58" W along the east line of said I.B.M. Tract a distance of 197.59 feet to an iron pin in its S.E. corner; THENCE S 86° 22' 05" W a distance of 518.25 feet to the S.W. corner of said I.B.M. tract; THENCE N 19° 09' 01" W along the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road a distance of 393.02 feet • to an iron pin being the S.W. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M., V. 7376, P. 1779, DRTCT. and L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES1480-247.WPD Page 12 7 A - 3z-/ being in the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road (County Road #3088); • THENCE S 88° 45' 45" W approximately 51 feet crossing Sam School Road (County Road No. 3088) to a point in the westerly right-of-way of Sam School Road; THENCE S 19° 09' 01" E, approximately 500 feet along the westerly right-of-way of Sam School Road to a galvanized iron pipe by a corner of a fence in the west line of Sam School Road; THENCE in a southeasterly direction crossing County Road#3088 (Sam School Road) to a point for a corner, said point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 and the northwest corner of Lot 6 of the R.P. Estes Subdivision as recorded in Vol. 1957, P. 324, DRTCT; THENCE easterly along the common south line of Lot 7 and north line of Lot 6 by deed a distance of 1349 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of the T. Mann Survey, said line also being the city limits of the City of Southlake; THENCE in a northerly direction along the east line of the T. Mann Survey and the west line of the J. Martin Survey A-1134 to a point for a corner, said point being by deed South 910.51 feet from the northwest corner of the J. Martin Survey and being the southwest corner of the tract of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #319; THENCE N 89° 27' 49" E to a point for a corner in the southwesterly R.O.W. of State Highway • 114; THENCE northeasterly at a right angle to S.H. 114 centerline, crossing S.H. 114 to a point for a corner in its northeasterly R.O.W., said point being in the southwest line of a tract of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #126; THENCE northwesterly along the northeasterly R.O.W. of S.H. 114 and said Ordinance #126 tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 27 acres of land, more or less. EXCLUSIONS FROM REZONING Save and except those portions of said Parcels "A" and "B" more particularly described as Strips No. 1 and No. 2 as follows: STRIP NO. 1 Being a portion of said Parcel "B" as described above, said portion being a strip of land 50 feet wide, the westerly line of said 50 foot strip described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said tract of land described by deed recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728, said northwest corner also being the southwest corner of the R. • Chandler tract described by deed recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. Said corner also being in the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 13 74 — 3i5-- Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road approximately 1250 feet to a point approximately 50 feet south of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way illof Precinct Line Road and the north line of the Scott Bradley Tract as described by deed recorded in Volume 6395, Page 67, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 50 foot strip containing 1.4 acres, more or less. STRIP NO. 2 Being a portion of Parcels "A" and "B" as described above, also being a strip of land 50 feet wide the southerly line of said strip described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the Alvin F. Olen Jr. tract described by deed as recorded in Volume 4181, Page 644, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said corner also being in the south line of Lot 1, Block 3 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 1466.76 feet to a point in the east line of the Howard Dudley tract described by deed as recorded in Volume 4888, Page 622, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; Thence northerly along the east line of said Dudley tract, said line also being the westerly line of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 460.91 feet to a point in the northeast corner of said • Dudley tact, said corner also being in the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3; north Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3, said line also being the line of said Dudley tract, approximately 1774.98 feet to the southwestern corner of said Lot 1, Block 3, said corner also being in the north line of said Dudley tract; Thence generally westerly along the north line of said Dudley tract, said line also being the south line of Parcel "B" as described above, approximately 100.93 feet; Thence generally northerly leaving the north line of said Dudley tract approximately 95 feet; Thence generally westerly, parallel to the north right-of-way of Dove Road (a variable width roadway), approximately 1396.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, Thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 241.85 feet, having a central angle of 89° 45' 10", a radius of 154.38 feet and whose long chord bears N 44 46' 35" W, Thence generally northerly, parallel to the east right-of-way of Precinct Line Road approximately 50 feet, Thence generally westerly approximately 50 feet to a point in the east right-of-way of • Precinct Line Road; L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 14 �/4.- -3 THENCE generally northerly approximately 600 feet along the east right-of-way of Precinct Line • Road to a point approximately 50 feet north of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road and the northerly line of the Hillwood/1088 tract as described by deed as recorded in Volume 12260, Page 1948, Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas, said 50 foot strip containing approximately 7.1 acres, more or less. O • , • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-247.WPD Page 15 71- - -3 7 w r • < b0 • CD n — --3 If ..I O.K.,3. jam ^� ��•( .mtuE \emu°' t. y r � CWrpf Y .(..w.[i) tit cn HJftft- .am !f \ °° � "" h 1 v r �.,� FUTURE D V�OPI&HT Kan..w a _ - IP Am! fir- --� ...� ``\'� '�� �rIS ` I DEve_oFIBfr PIJW CJ �,� F',CTS. fJE1•Fi.m. NT \ ��s \\7... ,I — J NA /AJ.. `E ' •- - E PROPOSED MO,R1�B11ML FLAWED VW oeaaarEBlr r, r T// xi NA,O1300.soot, I .. u..a..w; ivnrans Jr nna..ss , 4 Mn.a..... ay \FA tiq * </ 2 :`,E[mr`i=�ei: seti.'i>aE touro»i r or+u- r i{.-ias(aaon) .F` Y I /. � ' �.�\S. • ve ..n..o.raw 'u\ nRE.r. o t- noes POP 7 • •I 1 .sx.E•? . .w as�.a` ,wcr c y S1 t a. ... - cm ;fie,' .f i bE \ • • �x « w.x.cr.rs r'w mt.awoawwrtPSI i / �''', 'I I M.e :.i.... .� s nor.roof nE..a.0 1.�..t R.. .AF'. ff ...) I `l�„ ..... I TY ram ... p� -�d•,y.-.��>..�. . s a c.Ens,n,w ll, to AMA....IAJAPSNI SOW l. • • .; o ......wa Y it r —_ t ��, �r ' a iiac.�at n.n.v ,��w ru nn `� .. % *1 .. ,' \� • :: IIL=-__h;LJ 1 ,\ \ ,rtawnun..n.n. ,.r•ts cuwan r.... elj )�`l �� -- r_ 1� n,� \ \ �.. n t.µno.; LL \\ E t C sronrs cue �r -I.-mu.. \ Nn..t rLLt ... a .'S88'T1\ v.rtw dz- An , -PA Hl_IITT-MtIARS ` .....................� �a..o s1.3111.0 r .. a tEn� 1 a.t... n..r. Ii S O L A N A Zn_Y)-O). RECD JU_ 24 1997 N. City of Southlake,Texas • S STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-034 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-241 Rezoning/320 W. Highland Street STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of approximately 6.311 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being Tract 8D. LOCATION: 320 West Highland Street,being on the north side of West Highland Street approximately 800' west of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Highland Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Terry Robert Seaborn CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District • REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Five (5) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Kay Myers, 570 Love Henry Ct., Southlake, opposed. "SF-1B zoning-6 potential homes of 1,500 would not be in keeping with the immediate area. I would favor SF-1 A zoning." • Bert Yetman, P.O. Box 1116, Grapevine, TX 76099, undecided. "No knowledge of amount of homes to be built or class of home(s)." • Jerry Passmore, 340 Highland St., Southlake, opposed. "A subdivision off of Highland would 1. Not bean enhancement to any of us on the street. 2. Excessive traffic flow due to new schools and larger subdivision traffic. 3. Sewer is not available. 4. Road frontage is not adequate. If the request is only to be able to sell the house and one acre then and only IIthen would I agree to this request for rezoning." -Th- Z City of Southlake,Texas S . Robin Blackwood, 280 W. Highland St., Southlake, opposed. "We are strongly opposed to more than two homes in this tract. Our opposition is based on the character of the entire W. Highland neighborhood, which is "rural" in nature and has lots generally well in excess of one acre. We would prefer on home only. Thanks!" • Doreen Seebeck, 480 W. Highland, Southlake, opposed. I would be opposed to multiple housing development. I would be in favor of one or two houses built to conform with the rest of the neighborhood. I would like to continue to have access to the Southlake Equestrian Trail head#2." P&Z ACTION: April 17, 1997;Approved(5-0)to continue public hearing to the May 1, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. May 1, 1997; Approved (6-0) with the following recommendation: a portion of the tract,being approximately one(1)acre around the existing house on the southwest portion of the tract, be rezoned "SF-1 B" Single Family Residential District; the remainder of the tract, being approximately 5.311 acres, • be rezoned "SF-1A" Single Family Residential COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table until the July 15, 1997 City Council meeting. July 15, 1997;Approved(7-0)First Reading Ordinance No. 480-241. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\WP-FILES\MEM0\97CASES\97-034Z.WPD • I I rl ! ! 1. : 1 I :I:i.b •_.1111t_f.19 '87 ; IA to a • 35 Ac 1 . 0 • °qv. i e .. i . : : 8 ..... , IA2 11.33 Ac IEV- 1850 0./Nnk(GS 1___: ?V' 71 J wEaT 8.645 1 2 Ac --'-' E3_ .E10.1f_._._.------z-: . ,, = SURtEr A-1520 IA -, I,1.410Z . a ,n" ;:....e'. i I41 TI4CIA . I . GA 2A2A 88.7 Ac 35 Ac --- 40.0 Ac -_. ( .• 1------.10 Ac I 10 Ac r----; = A . -- 13 Ac 2A3 . ., 010 I 3A 3A1--, _ 2. ....Ar•,•* I 3A4 I 1&1C s' 'PC Pr .-' ... t j i3A1(5g 6F1 6F i LARICIGI 11. CH1VER3 20- '-... GR- q 0'4 A A 4 5 A M.33 Ac 2.1 '\ '. A \ / I '.,, % ,i '.> .%'i 6G241411/iiiiihs_ -4: 1. '3,-..43.--• ,._ oi •! 1! . • .... )-. 0....,_ 6G1 ,cs-7. ., .0\ ii _. 6J •`//',. g ov ; / ,,, ._:-. . 7 2E1 2, •- ---1---•1-.4? ' i '`, i •IA ..... , , ... i 7 7 /9 Li i 11 . ,, • sAh, i 382 38 3 381 1-NF i ' 4/0 3C 9 ./ 6)/- .15 Ac I-1W i i i A4v, ,.4 ___„-j-/' .<. G.^22 1.-'130g 3h 2C I [sir"'- VIL'IPli .:.7:' 60 :, i t•I, 0 .----- t 21 , 1 • I 1 i/ 25.406 Ac l'i/• 3 3A - al if._ 3E1E1 3EIA L.116 _ 1 '14 En r•--'- AC°11 8F1 ar aci!oz. 1 sc ' 381 3E sl 26 Ac I 8C3 i3D-911; V D .328C ______ I3FIG n PO rr ; ,-, 1D THOM L. 5A.S_-Mn\.A. 4M*M. AR -2 '' AP- 8G, , . , -- - •. ------i SURVEY A-2011 A N STREET 5.53 Ac IIE FA4 it, ••• . 8 , BA 8411 8AI6 8A5 4 8A8A1 aEl 8 8 884 ! 111 ...., 1 1F 192 - • 9 IA ,-----: I. 11E 1916 1° 1 A B 8E13 6 - L._., i i 1C A 8A8 31_2 88 . -. - --;,T i 6 , .. 8 n1014)1/4 1.2( 5 Ac - 1 AA ,,,,„ --, a 4.4A--- BelA s„,-_,f),,ii:"-.1,....0 r ..--- C' 8A3 A 881A P. •'tf'' l'IL• .,,,••, .11164 Ac lisIg MI i 8A15 8A2 8A9 BA - iiii • IAN4I -..-: .2.11C2 I1C2A1 11C2 . 10 . . r i - . ;', 111 " jiiii •-• ..0. 4 6.• i • / ,-.., .1.-+--11-4---vi-0--;-::-- . .„i l'1,- - i 1121 2,3•••':, 9._x i"'lragat.,,,,4 / ./ •2 '‘. ! ..-. ot .11.44.0 '\P.4\OC -- 1+i i I I 44:* --10...s's...v./ ,,./.. HALL , "11;71 ... \,' 10V -; 901 ! 4' 141)/ ' A ,I- ,. i 9 i .‘ a 0 ,,c) 1-... . i • .I, i i . 35 Ac e\ r I 1 _. .....,?,..... d. .. ;,,,, ....7.._. .„.,,, .... i ... . ! , , , , , . . , .. ...... . . , . . i • - ,..'i4f' -'0'.--' Lis x..\0. .---i--,-A--"t i-..i... 1 i. i P i •4., - • ... i "--I--. ! ! i ', ! I ! ! ! ! 1IA '.,.. '' j 1 . ,7,. f i i . C/f••• 1 1•• • iiiiii i ! it ! ! ! ! ! I 'IA ! i --7-1,.i.-•6,r ..... f 1-4-1-i-!--1-1,-- ---r..% ‘. • • - - • . . . ' owet.•••■•••00 11A2A "A gr in „ , ! " ; , : i r;c.4...ii... ..,:,.....,.......... .., . .4 ih-L-Li-i- i ! wr. saitirr, i i iii , tiA2 140101 t .i i i' ,V.-- .-.1-,. -11-11-7.-T' 9E -•- '-4.-- '-•-i--- 44; ! j • ' • 1 i • ., • .-..2.1...".,- i r7.:..4.-_ ,,i-k. 7, _IL ‘ , , , , , , / ?,, • - 1 03 t.:511' .._._. _ . '8 - i i ' N. N i i •! i i AL.C4 ; .---/ -11-4,,,./,. . LA1-1 i I OA- ,i '----!-•-• i..'--;--L. i i i • ' ---+- -; .--+-- .4- i i i • )-..4---i--. 5 '- .---- i'• „:N. . :L,%,. / ..--i-rs-T.1. \ \ '' . .1.:;:-..-. 3A e"CIV' , -55......j... - i • 8 ff„.... • j • 4.4 . .--.- -.1 -1--. Vr --,t ---L10:-. -' •. %.›. 5r--.4-- ... ••-•`.{,./ "es.'\ ! .1. `. - . .,. 11•-• •-. 5' •--+'-- .-1- tdi . ! i -<, I / .- i_S '-4 ''.,,i>. ,',C.'". , . --cx-4•-• _,L,-rp,1 ,. •,,'.'1 '‘• i 'e•-:. .. ‘ I i -4 'I'A --''', i ‘ 2C i i i 1..•i i i i 1 ‘ • L L i's. CO".• g-7 r-31..1.--)c. -. i ---,11'.--T-+ . ..o) A , , , , , i , , , I i i , .. :i4/•../.1/1•11. 'til•lelMIS......ri C . -' ' .... 1 i i. .% .\ TRACT MAP ri ), ,--, -,, III 74 1 i r --•,-__+, ii .tiiiii ..., (_ ...." .• 3J1 A 3•1 ii , 111 ! 1 ' ! ! ! ! i I ..• .,., .-'- 14EIR.01. elYs • I -...-1... 4. P I i 1. .. ........ . K .....___, 581 ' • . I . -.-- 3818 .-- i •••• • . 1 .... 505 3e2 184 GO _ _.,,, . • /-... .' , ....s. f . ..................._ _:: ; - .:, --••• ; . i ; 384A1 111Mailei . ttO tt.'''. a) .--... - . 7.ES 7,OUNLAXE Ell vD 1 --.......-.7/..... , ---.- •- •- -- . . • II I -I-4..C.1.'1,s•_110951-e_MIL.-17.31/ 1 ' Ill 2A1 a ' . " ,..i %. f X .. X 5C 5F 1 5E1 5D1 501 502. I I 5 -I/: •. - ! , 2 A ;:.1 -. )AC1 /23C2(( ‘..-7 ' '''.3 1 ! . ' r ( . SF-1 A S—P-2 i 2.3( 0 : B EDWIN COLE MINISTRIES r 2R1 1 g 3.970 C • S.RICHARDSON S—P-1 \ } R x .✓•. \ 1 - I �--\ J. KUELBS 1 an ago au ne u+ • AG w coM. WOOLEY ) TR 8F1 LU 1 2.0 © . cE 1.5 AC ,. ,w O AG O m AG TR . 4 TF I AG __ 6. - AC • 2. 5 „ w TR TR v 8D2 --1 ip R 8E • co w E AG I. K. TR 8C2 ' t.. AC iu)LIJ TR 8G 1 .82 4.0 AC o E.5 ACE J. PASSMORE i 1 w x in tt " II ,w - w 341. W HIGHLAND ST J J W TR 8A5 TR a TR E i 1 .69 O •E 2 8B2 Q TR 0 8A 13 .46 TR 8A8A1 B. YETMAN = x AC J. MYERS TR 8A11 .76. noPI 2.33AC A rs • TR z TR 81 8B 1.21 a H 2A i TR 8A16 TR 8A8 TR BABA D n 4.9AC 1.39 0 1.22 AC I -1 nPN 7R (4.4 AC) Nl r 1 OO 6 , - 1.21 ix el ADJACENT OWNERS 3 AND ZONING TR 1 ,.8 TR SA15 x 2.54 AC SPIN #11 ROGER HUTTON 97 _ _ 03 : TR 8B1 I I �� • 1g Ii TR 8618 ..,r- ... •te:,.:ttfrii,,- 71,,,:..„%,„.,,,,-,407.,,a, pz‘t .•4„...,,1„i.., , ...,...,.„3.„,„...?-: - . , 4,.:;:,-...--;,:;-, -,..17;-,. .-.,igt"',. ..:Opi..„.- g010,17-A1.7„i--4*•;:t.•?:'-'4.--.•,!-:..':„ - _.v).i.:',-:.)--':,*•1°•in',-14._,,i,:';:-?,4iPC:"-• "•'1,.;.;,-.•', ,:.;-..-ei•'-.;1•:`Ir'.-:7.. \".'••'••:1:;:•"•''5-4--.44,-;','`.•:,'•;-4•-;t*-I4.-:,..---,7:-.-*irivz: ', .• •. -,1;-,'1 ....,--...:-.-4.7•1'•::,..:1.0-r,4:-I':,';,A,4fl'•,:147,1;!:'''.,...,..,-.174::;Jirt•zr:- .-...„ -. 4110 --•,- -- cl es. -I.,r,-- ./;.4.- .-.A6te.;r:,. -..1,41..^4, C'!.,1; ;...: '' l''T' - :•";.'..-:..;•!`.;*;,•'.**,iik.'•'..f:-.„:,.,;;-,:,:-;',- .,;•,,5,:,,,T,',4- ;',-..-...- . - - -,44.-,,.....--,:..n..., ;.••• _-:. --L.:. _ ,..., • .- •-•:4(.6.4.'ii."41.c.Itt .vi4.-z.,-;.,'t.: - !•1,3.4037: . •, '...-;#:::Yi1e.44:`;:::•'-'1-3f7;',..7-;','w•s'4.:.:'''', - . '1;.:'71if*.•';'-,':' ,'''• • • .'Z.,.:...'1., .. RAVENAUX VILLAGE '. ... littleTT'AEF1 ),.4) .„ : ..:4 ' ; , .., _ .- . •. . . ' . . ,. ,..-..›;,-,FEllists.,4: ,:.4.....0-•. :•,•„.-,, • ., - • -, .,,, , , ., , .—,•• .Agedirelse.4•?4---•• - .* - •- „ . . _,L.,/ .. 0•1 /-'-a.s - EAST •••-:54,2.97 g ... -:-- -" ' .' : I , ,vt0,R. S 8- i :. N.... '''.- .. ... • :', ..i:i.• )c4- o.# . •- - • 1.8 09 • , :.,..::, , old. ....,,, N- 1-90.00` C ql io 0.I.R.' 8.311 ac 0 274,912 et , tr) 2.0 cc co +. . . • . ( 5,5-11 2 • . - . Aff3.• f 1 / -,.. — -- • io 0 3 4a. 0 -" ac 09-' ac 'k. 't4 L3:7..'. , ...,.... , . z 1$owcel v _ _ vi.lea .. pc.,line 1',-,, b ••- -L.'-`1:-—.....=,....i._..1,4L_____I. _ _......_r____. ______ 1 .(--- •.R - -."1./.... $ 89' 46' w - 346.34' _ WEST HIGHLAND ROAD . kA 1‘4 0/• C tt"Oi.:'•I''- ...;::. ..- :.... '''''' .---..." -'-'.-7' --- "" --''.-L----.L17 -' TRACT OF LAND - IN THE T. M. HOOD SURVEY, A-706 +?' TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 0 • ' • "- 2 A 1997 10 RE CD MAr( _ III ,.. . t..,-.TtiOtviPs _ •I anise*bald to be a true smd 731STERPRCIFESSIC -Intoin niennabip4t‘kn of'Mb - . - _ (11-5f 7 6- .) -- tmOrtt...441141tedOinittki surveY *. :.Aa %ici't on 1los'itound- ' . 1400 -W. EULESS BLVD. ':iay,11. , •, . .....-11111,,.. t..., SUITE 102 , . • 4,-,12st - .. EUUESS,TX. 76040 . '142.---- 'I '-'4"7"1"---'".'' • 4 i It% - - (817) 267-9269 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-241 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.311 ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, BEING TRACT 8D, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A" FROM"AG"AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF- 1B" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person • or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES1480-241.WPD Page 1 3, • changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those S who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City Sof Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-241.WPD Page 2 _] i3 . -7 I I • Being a 6.311 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, being Tract 8D, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development Sof the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any • and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-241.WPD Page 3 7I3 - „ • until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-241.WPD Page 4 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-241.W PD Page 5 713 � 10 111/1 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at an iron rod in the line of West- Hig1140d ,Road and being the Southwest corner of a 2.0 acre tract -as_conveyed to Michael Deese, et ux Pamela Deese by deed recx riled on Page 1822 of Volume 8422 in the Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE S 89° 48' W along the North line of said West Highland Road a distance of 346.34 feet to an iron rod at the Southeast corner of a 0.92 acre tract as conveyed to Jerry Passmore, et ux Bernice Passmore by deed recorded as Tract A on Page 512 of Volume 7311 in the Tarrant County..Deed Records; THENCE North a distance of 399..16 feet to an iron rod at the Northeast corner of Passmore Tract A: THENCE West a distance of 190.0 'feet .tq .an, irom rod in the East line of a tract as conveyed to= Robert, E. SeeleCk, et ux Marilyn E. Seebeck by deed recorded .on Pa 281 of Volume 6267 in the Tarrant County Deed` 4 • THENCE N 1° 29' '36" W a dirt rice of 254 7L•-feet to.41.F ;fin rood at the northwest corner of said 10:0 '` s7 South line of Lot 2-B-1, BURNEP1 ACRES. ADDITICt4, an -addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 719 of Volume 3087114 in. the Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE East a distance of 542.97 feet to an iron .rod in the South line of Lot 2, Block B, RAVENWJX VILLAGE, an addition to the City of Southiake, Tarrant -County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 31 of Volume 388-213 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and also being the Northwest corner of said Deese tract; THENCE South a distance of 651.58 feet to place of beginning, containing 6.311 acres or 274,912 square feet of land. 111/1 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-241.WPD Page 6 /2 - 4 , ! City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-068 PROJECT: Site Plan - Emergency Animal Hospital on the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Stonebridge Park STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for approximately 0.65 acres situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and a portion of Tract 2D. LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 550' west of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Randol Mill Drive. OWNER: N.T.V.M.G APPLICANT: William E. Hickey • CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. LAND USE CATEGORY: "Mixed Use" and "100 Year Flood Plain" CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: July 3, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997, with the following amendment: 1) applicant to meet articulation as required. COUNCIL ACTION: July 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table and to continue the public hearing to the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements of Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997 with the exception of those requirements 11) in attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated August 1, 1997. 7c. , r. *1 UWs .' ... W L .IC". \ — , ir il 1 - tit' , stioRD 11.......0 -:L3w0ri r ''-e-i,. 11raPv0o•• .r1ileeur 4i0l% 1t014o t � i r - ram- � - R■■ n:`i-I , ��• / �� 40 .6111/011,4 N � � �t NiW vN14:1`kc UNIUM011* 0 #111 111.1 liiirlit _ edit Si- alli•klii, irlessto- tl I .....%)1101, \ ,:.741. ,,,,,, lipiIlerI •. - WV 111/ 11 NE1101 i 1„," ES(P •We li H( I ARROLL %mow iiiie Riau-- 1101a____ 4:‘ OA. 4 pooh _ • . •d- illIeNli — rd.* , lbillom •��''. �� I III ice.��a � /��� • , r tompoilkuh. I. 1 jo ir. .. . ... ....Lip..., i.,.., :........ ,. . _. :,..... �,/ " /-- up ., „ , „4, ;"me 0...w....- rF • •N., " k Nkk, 4 is mg i mg el ____________,_,___,,„.i, I 111 g 14 Ibitliir 0 imrilliEsiNv:p 164078/1 i• Na , .,..1.0......,li • . / 1 i''.-. IiiiiirieN Jar • --.1„. _,, . ..,thdr•se...0 -- maw • i milim_________L_______________ MN AT 1 (CeN11- I he . , 1 ELDENTARY 0 ,\ P� P TRACT MAP ' :ompiled for The -7 , _'-- -.', . ys,: A ► AT Es E o180 --2- oSo� 6 1TR 2 • 6A 68 1 1.475 0 ia- ��� 6 , AD. 1 CoR�D N ' � a , r- 3 o r. t Q T 7 7 1 �. as 4 ga 4w 85 an .,.1 L MI 1 NN GALL DD J A � 8 - NO4/ I `LP '' J- MARTIN w H.C. FORESTER I r� '/ I 2FC C3 ��'/' I �.692 O , 5.55� �ti� ' 3R2 * �� • ,�-t S� S-P-2 'Ole ���� \ TR 2A4 TR 2A4A - 7221 O rj , ,d 5� \ .88 AC 1.01 -10 IC xe o ; 1 1R � - , ,� r` -5r9.Q), I i 2.560 IR.2F TR 2D1 ��1co • �0� . '1-y�3�° ,'ps� 1 u+ 71 O "I ' F 9G •. 1, I � ' G✓ - 99‘'t2 4 \ TR I �OF 2F I 2A3 TR ITR ,�5 a SpC • 9T \ 2A 2A TR 2A1 AG• 3A 1 A -\R ZF3 / \ .46 1 3.63 AC 10B C2 002 O \ O 46 45 0 i'O 5R' \ TR 2A5A SF-1 A METZER DIARIES , TR 2A5 TR 2A58 044 10A C- LAM I se 1 9R t\l. 2M 1A \ A \l _ • 7R 2A /1'432 1.0681 O .50 I TR • ' N1/2 ADJACENT OWNERS "� '1.4:, g TR 2A6 __g_--- AND ZONING TR 2A 1.4 AC -J 1 1.236 AC S1/2 ;;;- I 2 SPIN #16 JOHN AND LINDA WILDER 1� I Itil A . . 1 � � '� \ \ I! IF _TR 1 ^ I • 0 • 1 !r1 o Po.e. , 1,i...I I _-FRAR- ZE s�..• s (M1ALt 1 ,LLba NI.r[L> ;VR Ael!ISC VLTyaA � �\� ' M1N�1'U{c± �N-1 ,(..aJ` ER .,•. r•:v?�,ro. `, eF Ae,..,,, 'nr.J ����J I J►-I` P,`,,L`a F AM..,^ 'Cl..A %�'�'S'.� - P. .Sa'Va �P/FMl ',, ,• IO- -�� LM.FS[Aa4rARY I Lor7 . s." I rin.ecuNL --- 1i'/i*. _ _ : 1 _ •.4.L..:'ql 1"..... 7Jt•T ` - I es7-Ares s. \ !-� j 1 I . '::: c _ la'_FL' .0 \ a.V.ro Fe.(. FL1 5%.Jya L I 1 i.`*'I,✓,. - �_�1yy-� I FF�R ` IS. JANr</ea��; c AS ,;."....• " . '• -. I j 1 .lr1'� I( -. i uLF4 a.raAca • 1 ' "G•;1-1 -- —•-•„a•a; . ,..) ) ':$ \ ;4sz c,r��`>.......____,--..:__..._-----•,..,,::? % 1 :lc 1(r.(�..:�ir`c.) (.(.(a T�_-� _ sYrL ri- j ,I 1 •1 r,(.,. ,v r,' . I \/ �. 'e,A,L I I` 1 ! 1 ie sre¢ .. '' ^ I -4,1 ••�s`,k \ os,,,\yi'' ,..--.n., 1 '''''.. ......., 44.?1) 1 I-. ,I . :i 1 -,,, -----.1_______ \ 'S"..t0 \ / I a I 1 I 1-3• \ 1 i I 1. 1\ .,,,, �'t " ,/, 2 .Loq for*Ace LI R ,\.. \\ , l.._. ,w,a{ / `�~._� / ;�Y`ti a �.L co �j ,.. . • 5. ,•5J\\\ 5 C:., I' ACT I i r.ly.'f .f. .uFFe:K Ve•ts \\ •.,4 .� /// ~r IEf Fa Po�ae /� ...-r.J .t• 4 / 1 o , 1\ 11 '_ L at%.G'a.•so.R-�' .--•• `.\_ Y -_ - /'/ s'�.�Ii.. -•-4 I., =• .` `\ \ -.. Ler 3 * i 1 cnee LeruHe s.' ..:•,aere.•4- 1 • �`t \ // • G2 O^.l`% / rr ( y h) I 1 SreTas . .. ,iM \. }�').,�.�`____ _ .. / ,u.S ..1,r CS �%� �•� ' S1j I .• IC ' Iv 1 I EFis . 4 A . ` .LYE.• II I e - '` ,SJ��/as 1, ''.l --_ - 1 I 1 IWeeQ(e seA •\ '"• �r:>rs ;3s -l ' i/1 1 �� _'`: f oc.1ee 1 l SYsat I LreJc 1 ..itw.:"..... . ... co a \ .9 1 efFrte f'- try:- l I x 1 ,.... bA m f— ,,, \ ) ,kJ. _ .s \ V 1 /N t: � r \ '• ONE me GF.F. CO rJ = .\ :-, 5 \• \ , \ 'Ni'.y..- '!X!7i•T TLC■ O \r .'St'•�i/ \ .\�• \\. ^• %� \. �( (a>_ a•R n..,..Thus 4 Go.wr.a \ I ' p:O \ Sw.L 1 i.tr. N. "! (11 ear: \ ; LoT 2 '.44,� '� rye .e • 11 N ',ores, - ` .L ,. �.. 1 nr..!. asa see _ ..1 awe, IS ' .\ _a-e's'i,:;.” . . , _.. a -._ _ �..r..•,(a -:N•awry e.a neee o,.F., a'...tee.e..:. I.A,.� 0-1-a..,.o,u4a W..L s , .,i , �\ L.1 L. ea Coto-STORY, 1. - _ 2 I. 0-2-, T,.ece WILL Ba es ae..•e o[ lie PAINr strops l4Re.T'ER �t r\ \. ‘.'.•> I o.,..n.,�„ TN Awl 2..7 5.F• ,.,PALtesr: E, y_,ae 1 L. RE ALTI'Ca.-.. . CtRP. L c• .w.� gale,rat..L,e ali ter -F e- C..-1. [.rs I.y r.( vs asl \ 4p.11'=!T -. , _. !"2. ZOv4•i;t t[ffGt%=3T I 1' " [......• KCD SEP 10199E Ouwas.,.: ��y�.5�p'.�r'�'�,K�_ :.4 Tot acLu<,, r+ Ia PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN °`4GZ;—�_ss H;:: ;, City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ease No.: ZA 97-068 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Site Plan - proposed Lot 2, Block 1, N.T.V.M.G. Stonebridge Park, being 0.65 acres situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 APPLICANT: DESIGNER: N.T.V.M.G. William E. Hickey 1029 William D. Tate Avenue 1384 Shady Lane #1407 Grapevine. Texas 76051 Bedford, Texas 76021 Phone: (817) 488-7533 Phone: (817) 545-1967 Fax: (817) 421-9341 Fax: (817) 496-0951 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. Show and label properties across Southlake Boulevard with plat information (if platted), owner's name, zoning and land use designation according to approved Land Use Plan. ill. Show the proposed finished grade of the site, with contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet on the grading plan. 3. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c. on the south, east and west facades. Compliance with articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. (P & ZAction 7/03/97: applicant to meet articulation as required) * The applicant should be aware that all mechanical units must be screened of view from F.M. 1709 and any residential properties within 400'. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Preliminary Plat of the entire development of Stonebridge Park and a Final Plat of this site, inclusive of proposed street right-of way, must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * If the proposed street into this site is not to be fully constructed with this development a temporary • turn-around, meeting fire department and public works requirements, must be constructed. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. City of Southlake,Texas * Denotes Informational Comment •att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: William Hickey N.T.V.M.G. Larry Hutto, Fax (817) 491-4922 L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97068SP2.W PD S 0 Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No. ZA 97-068 Date of Evaluation: 8/01/97 vations for proposed Lot 2, Block 1 of Stonebridge Park ceived 7/21/97 Front- facing: South Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 14 -61% Yes 36 14 -61% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 6 200% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 2 5 150% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Rear- facing North Not required, facade is not visible from F.M. 1709 Right- facing: East Wall ht. = 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 30 23 -23% Yes 30 16 -47% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 2 0% Yes A. artic. length 4 2 -50% No 1 3 200% Yes eft- facing: West Wall ht. = 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 30 24 -20% Yes 30 20 -33% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 4 6 50% Yes 1 3 200% Yes III ° o�o � S g li a :C x S c IE Eo F its4 ‘-. . 1,. „z‘a".1.* N'' V 5 I, b' \ Fit •F �O N `�� \,... \A yb LRBETE PA'� �E::Lsc s " %., \ \`' *Walk:,:iij '''':''WXNA !.,--, ' `\ ‘� \ 2 on /L 11.. t ° k4�gEi6ap--a d ])/r•I �� 'JOq��� ` bo. . Vf\ef% - .!! ._ a 'ii Pi3'�a'c''2�lli lb- _ '',0•!ti.dP ,.1 , . . .. ,. '1 :. . _ 0, , -... , QA 0• IT S, . 1b T O'_O• iC \ \` .E HS t Uiil of it33Tg. o o2N o0,;:. � • .4 26 `e � ,1 4 ° G " ®i~4�6 ��— s V; x C�� E a \ oe p� s • . a • ASmoo 0 LE 0 x rr, o K m u K 000, � � •i '� 'r u 'g E.°s o s t, 4 1 se COD a''a E v E CASE I:ZA9T-OE13 OWNER/ APPLICANT CONTACT REP. WILLIAM E. HICKEY N.T.V.M.G. LARRY D. HUTTO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER MT PLAN FOR„TY11G -AN ER ANIMAL NOSPITAL•PRESIDENT LARRY EPPERSON 300 TROPHY CLUB DR. DATE: • T LOT 2. E]YB SP rT.Or LAND O_E5 ACRES' - STE. 400 1384 SHADY TM //1407 ,_,_„ STONEBRIDGE PARK AT$OUTNIAKE BLVD..AN 1027 WII LUtb1 D. TATE AVE. TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS BEDFORD, TEXAS ADDITION COUCOUNTY,T THE �L1(ASr S°�LAXE. GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76021 76051 76262 OFFICE: (817) 488-7533 OFFICE: (817) 430-8839 OFFICE: (817) 545-1967 FAX: (817) 491-4922 FAX: (817) 496-0951 i • zo'-e" - r r o e• I I z . n \ x N a oar 11-2. 8, w r P A H AL :=ap® w n . 1 'A 0 0 14.-2. g àh 7. gr ro % 2 a I 1 w zo-e" — �o�Ru � � pS u b N'o LJ l�J m b6 4° C , C 2xu O O ��� z z ix_ i'P' C r P 5 (.0 CO OWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT REP. N.T.V.M.G. LARRY D. HUTTO WILLIAM E. HICKEY ,r,.,.,.,W,. .N 1110 PRESIDENT LARRY EPPERSON 300 TROPHY CLUB DR. DESIGNS Ow car*rtiw W.W111W adm it 1027 WILLIAM D. TATE AVE. STE.400 1384 SHADY LN. #1407 w• •-"W vrbr^M„w DATE WYar r cm IW ]/1/Y) GRAPEVINE, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS 76262 BEDFORD, TEXAS I mo+-V1 —0. 76021 -p.- s R r 1. K dra 76051 OFFICE: (817) 430-8839 rr.,.' wCola OFFICE: (817) 488-7533 FAX: (817) 491-4922 (817) 545-1967 • Ida 'J1- IL • Z. S :4i b� �n5= i - of N m • z-o ..x.i -,9 \ 9 c,�s O z , wR4� ®®® � _ \ it / N / x ?-4'_ •-O. r ih c 0 :>>• z-o• T ril s pr — -�- FR- zY_e d C_ 0. 4 LV CD CO V OWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT REP. N.T.V.M.G. LARRY D. HUTTO WILLIAM E. HICKEY ,_,,,,.,.,.,J„,,..,,, PRESIDENT LARRY EPPERSON 300 TROPHY CLUB DR. DESIGNS r„' ,�"*balm . 1384 SHADY LN. #1407 N"'r,„w DAiE: ��� 1027 WILLIAM D. TATE AVE. STE.400 tiler r oe�4nb J UW 9�I�Y, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS 76262 BEDFORD, TEXAS 1.4 _......,... 76021 '�'w—N`".°ft'.. 76051 OFFICE: (817) 430-8839 (817) 545-1967 r�`LA`r�' OFFICE: (817) 488-7533 FAX: (817) 491-4922 • / ` City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-080 PROJECT: Second Reading/ Ordinance No. 480-248 Rezoning/A portion of Lot 2,Block 1,Baker Estates STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property described as being a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.2983 acres. LOCATION: West side of South Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Boardwalk Avenue and South Peytonville Avenue. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Brandon and Charlotte Baker CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District • REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Four (4) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: July 3, 1997; Approved (7-0) to table and to continue public hearing until the July 10, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. July 10, 1997; Approved (7-0). COUNCIL ACTION: July 15, 1997; Approved(7-0) First Reading Ordinance No. 480- 248. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "RE" Residential Estate District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-080Z.WPD � I� -1 A r-- - i • , ..• -- • 77=4!Li a '• • .. -- ,-( 1111M11111 &':•IV.A IAIA IV:.'VA IAIAIA ''.• .-... 441 .^, • • MA: *...+.4.•. , !8 , , , • 1.7.y.. --- . . . , ii ,.— -lb , : , 8 i 8 t 5511111111111: •- - - •:.•.;3 ----. .i4.--jt-i QP-•-•-4--• -.. , i , , . .. Jill „. .., Jo _,,,.. . .. . i-... V' -----• •-• : - • *, ,. .-./' ; - , % • , 1 1 i t.; ' N 11011111i— ; 16,. .....r....--riK, i --,- ks.sAp tricirl I, i ''', .... 2CIC* . ::" S.. s. ' A.. ' jrkri 1 I.j 1 .. 13 " ...'' '.- aim R saner A-5 ,e .--(.4.'•,. `• s...1,'• '-.i•A ' ..1.-• • - ... ' ' • '''. * 1 e•, $.-,-, s._._.__,, sw co , $ -. • .-- f--:,.)`,. .-1---- , •1----7-•--4 I., • -,st-. ..,.. - , ,-" • lEi 2A1•., V...+"% 4)s \s. . -.1 „.„ . I ''','".. • / X i r t A‘••;k•jr•: \ i' 1 ' : ).- '-.-C. ,- g`N.' --T--t-1'cs % ‘ .•-• . 9e1 , ... .-. LA • -, k • . X., ! % • ...„, s. •••‘ . ,/ it. 1 IE . ,, ; ,'-f-T.t% -• •••,..... .t-l-c ...... • -,. .....„ ,(.,- xl • i '• •-• % ."-..c _ I • ' 4 •-• •'' 'I,.;r457 .r-)3"--.....-. 1 i - • . : ID: --, _ r r ! 11111 .C! ID 1 i i .),: - _0-•-• \ • • . 1 ! . • •-.. `. • . . ' ! /A...... : i• ._ ._.;_::: ! =.4-.-. .-.-, 17--1r- 7-4-8'-'4-1-C... . , Y,. ! . . ... ,_.... , ."-- ._._8 1 1 /1/4, ! i s t•ryki* .1 ti j--i Reg i , • ; ;2 ! ; 111160*** )e :; 11 • i to"1 -- .7-.,.. .-.,'. .1.. ...-k:-\--',7--:!':::: .A": .. . .i \S '‘ .‘ V.... .. .. .si ' ._j --' :„c .•--` ..)D• I ird:.:Ar- . - • :_ . - . . ., s- --. -1.1 . "4-1 ---; `• daliHr,.. 01 -/ ,...., if ...--g,---' -44 -'' _ . ..... .,- :---- -g :-.! - -.. • • ;.„,ii . 2 " • ! ! ! ! ! , *4 ! ! .,_ 1.- c -- -- = :::- i -. •le..-i-N: ! ..„,' 0.1... •..... i •9 ..., : F _r-. 49 — •-! • .... ..• ..... , *-!' -7-. . . t - L._ I _ ...• -. .,. , . .i i i 7 - i_._c, . - ..: ! , st l \• ---. 1 „ 7-71- gv. ___.. ,.5 _ _ ,A ,E . OW Apr •---------- - 1 ...sr(....".114,... I i i . .....r- -.Pa' : j • f _. ... ,„ ______ "- - ___ _ _ I ..... ..,,-..11P 7 I, X' , • . . . . . i N ..k2 , 888888i ,8 j ‘ is 1AI 3 7 -- 1 - .. 1,......, * •-•L. ' - A ... r.i:F :AI : t-- 4 /....aL...ii IA i :Aided IA A 3C ' 4:11..1---L i 1• . .tE-- r.r.;,15 IMA 3.71 FZ°IL .-- .-.4 s• .". '•.-%. . r•- -• - 9 3 -- CAR H .". An. ,. .'Sjc. 1 A,.. , - - ..\ r 3C:A H1G. 1, • CI: .''..- A.". •o- X. • -0 4. 2A.3 'Al HO° . 11, -5•-••• '7.-- ---2.2 - - ....4 -- jkiag..r) i SC mrrIOH ,__,, twist . -. .- I - -- ,:-1 - --4 4---1-11- rN . ,s. 1-.... -4..._. • _. '.-1, -- --. P ..... ce.-.% .i.,...•k.'17. ... :D..- • 7 ... I _ r• r,.--c..."--b. 4- -7 •• ! - i r. . , , ,. -.-*QUIR.J. PADEN '. 2,-. - 'I. 4 --)....4-4 • Y - i. s „T.- B:'2, irg ----t1t95 sCRICY A-1253 ••"- • ‘ . .i . -,1•1, . 4- . *R" • • 1 ....'.aetef - --1. 7tc...14*-1.2P • .)-4-sr. e • - . - J-J.J,... ..•-:,-. _. .-.. 1 2A5 , . v. '.,,08- i i ,c.• -„,,.. . t ,.,., ...,....>-- -. ._...., • . k N• i :A.," • ;A 6,..‹. SA , -,-^f- '... ..' ; „..• c ..i. ........ ... .....-.—. _i: V#Ari 5g , 3... . V\i‘....'!,• . -',... .,. . • •.. . .r.;.g.- •.- c..' A15 : . ._. •C. ....-A•r;.-A, . ._lc 1.. %:114 . -..,..A..'. • • --'7Z1(5g •. , •••... _ --4L:4 :.—= 2f ! ... -..., I , • -• 2 ... "1.. • 14FZ ' . ..,{ .2 .!L, IR r 4-1:r.1114 I,*00 .'4. ..1 - -.1-.-ir ji-•-•i s 5 12Ac IA A Ac I I "‘ --"'" • J. THOF NI- :t., ;--- ..- --. . . , • . ;;;_A IA: ; IA4 . ;WV• I: :I : ;C, ! III .."-! ‘ ;4 , .!I X ' . .: • 1A31 IA PAR ' Ac tea.'- i I '.... 1 ii 1 , 1" • ., "...‘ •J‘ * Z ..,.. IA2E :Ac dripa5 ..- '-',- .-. .-1.-e." "-r--4 -LT- . ••‘., -... -.••• • _ .1'` THOLIAS J. . ,t`r`l V, to-! • ICH :- • 00.-\-- .-÷-- . _. 9 ,, -- • . . . Er_7 s . T - , A-1302 '. • • -•-- L..-.. 1. '... -7- :. .....,,, le•MIIIP!. .11+ •. 2A2 ,-.• / .-* = i f„:, .-, I •"' ,v•• s .- , , I i i el ••' t • i —7.7.pr, , . , i •• - r-. '- -4.,,44.44.4§ - $ 0 - ---i:•I. 6:: •-• ./A I . i L•-• .-1.4..r! r. ' / 1 • '' al.,.444,.- . . -- 19: i i i j 2A3 .. ,, . ...r _ • .14,1; ._. i •—I I I 1:1 vr...atti.: .,.. . •-5rTz Vs: ' 15!' *-1.,1) tEria ' , x• .\ • 4.: • ....1.. 2 Ac E t-1 - ...4 -- -- . ..., •e.. ,-; •!, , , , 1 5A •%. I I -_...?..4_,....i..1 -,1 r"--- .....\ I. .7. N-,.:-..-, . _ ' I TRACT MAP y rA rC.,,° .. I-. —_. , ' ,‹ ''' •- . •-- •-.../ , ! CHV• .,11.1 sal,. :! ,.. •,.-1'1 .' .48. • r..-. I 0 ..a.,. ,..,i "•(- Krf 1 .1"hAt;% ‘. 1," • ,.',1-.,(-,. • --. .,5--•-•', 4 7--..,,55 ,',,coli.v f9 , , .... , , othgr• , ,, ,,,riree • ' ,' '' , 1 I , 1 I , I , , III1i1 , 1 , I 1 , 1 , I , , • 1 I , , 1 , ��rH1 j \ wo I • SF-20A I , r 1 i 'i is CHATEAU DEVELOPMENT TR 3A 1 .05: Iv.� R. GOODE ` \ 1 ' I , SF-20A I (rH1�f s 1 , 1 1 !� C. BAKER RE 1 , 1 , I +' 1 5.00 O/ { It t I 3 SF- IA A509 ` rl I It a 1 / I . A IiIIIIL1 \ B. BAKER NJ 1 IM 1 • ~ / • 1 1 • . TRACT 1 1 , . I , . 1 1 1 1 we I , I , I , I , I 1 $ TRACT 2 , 1 , i 1 I 1 I , 1 1 w. I , 1 , 1 , L _1TRACT 3 TR23 RK • 14.49 AC - A IR pA Tfs fs '600." TRACT ADJACENT OWNERS .1069\ i TRACT 4A 0 MPS�N AND ZONING 3.5031 ° VEOZ SPIN #14 DOUG MCKELVEY »o A_, 1 5 TRACT T,5. 5 R .1181 D-3 . • TRACT 5A '"0 3.9819 0 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-248 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BAKER ESTATES, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.2983 ACRES SITUATED IN THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF- IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL • ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-lA" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-248.WPD Page 1 -70 S facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their Soriginal investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed S and amended as shown and described below: Being a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates, being approximately 1.2983 acres L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-248.W PD Page 2 • situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "RE" Residential Estate District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning, map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable S consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances S affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-248.W PD Page 3 -7I) -67 • Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-248.WPD Page 4 '^] -') 0 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-248.WPD Page 5 • EXHIBIT "A" Beginning at a iron rod found in place at the northwest property corner of Lot 2, Block 1 of said Baker Estates addition in the east property line of a tract of land conveyed to Robert G. Goode (Goode tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 4359, page 195 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.) and at the southwest property corner of Block 2 of Stonebury Addition an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917 of the P.R.T.C.T. ; Thence, North 89 degrees 27 minute 31 seconds East, with the north line of said Lot 2, Block 1 of said Baker Estates addition and the south property line of Block 2 of said Stonebury Addition, 337.59 feet to the northeast property corner of said Lot 2 and the northwest property corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Baker Estates addition; Thence, South 00 degrees 31 minutes 50 seconds East, with the east property line of said Lot 2 and the west property line of said Lot 1, 167.57 feet to an iron rod set for a corner; 11111 Thence, South 89 degrees 31 minutes 37 seconds West, 338.22 feet to an iron rod Let for a corner in the west property line of said Lot 2 and in the east property line of the aforesaid Goode tract; Thence, North O0 degrees 19 minutes Vest, with the west property line of said Lot 2 and the east property line of said Goode Tract, 1t7.17 feet to ;he Point of Beginning; The tract of lard being herein described contains 1.2983 acres (56,555 square feet) of land, acre or less. • L:\CTYDO C S\O RD\CASES\480-248.W PD Page 6 ' I.C( City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-055 PROJECT: Second Reading/ Ordinance No. 480-246 Rezoning/Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. LOCATION: Approximately 200' east of the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. OWNER/APPLICANT: Ken Smith CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District • LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO.NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) (1ST NOTIFICATION) RESPONSES: None NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) (2ND NOTIFICATION) RESPONSES: Four (4) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Iva Lee Johnson,720 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed. • Bobby Struempler,700 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed. • Pamela Morrison, 710 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed. "0-1 bufferyard - I would like to see the additional 10' or 15' as discussed in last meeting. 0-1 screening - I would prefer to see a masonry fence rather wood for both the look of it masonry and would be in better shape over time." 1111 Second response letter dated July 14, 1997: "With _7E- 1 City of Southlake, Texas S regard to Zoning case number ZA97-055 (ord# 480- 246) we wish to reinstate our opposition to the 0-1 zoning request. Since statements made during the council sessions do not appear to be enforceable, we must oppose this case until a signed agreement with the developer is obtained." • Ken Shafer, 1013 Brockbank, Dallas, Texas 75229, opposed. "Please consider Jennifer Shafer and I as owners of a residential lot which abuts the property requesting a zoning change to be opposed to the granting of 0-1 zoning. It is our opinion that the requirements and restrictions of 0-1 do not provide enough separation and screening between the two uses. We also believe that without further concessions by the property owner, our property will be negatively impacted by this development and subsequent buildings. We are currently working with Mr. Smith to resolve many of these issues and will inform you should other provisions be made where 0-1 would be objectionable." • P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved (5-0) motion to reconsider case; Approved (5-0) motion to rescind case; Approved (5-0) to table and to continue public hearing until June 19, 1997. June 19, 1997; Approved (7-0) with the following amendment: 1) 20' bufferyard adjacent to the west with a 6' wood fence and a mixture of pines and cedars for the 8' screening device. COUNCIL ACTION: July 1, 1997; Approved (7-0) with the following amendments: 1) recognize that the applicant volunteered to increase the bufferyard from 10' to 20'; 2) place an 8' masonry fence on the west; 3) build residential-style buildings with pitched roofs. July 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "0-1" Office District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. Due to approximately 25% opposition of property owners within the 200' notification area, a super-majority vote (6 of S7)of the City Council will be required to approve this request. L:\WP-FILES\MEM0\97CASES\97-055Z.WPD At'JItSL751000MAEL0 n • ) AUNSCH w� u n F Nuw ee HARDT 104s H,""F"„` KOl'F ruanRw.(214)a55 75G0 HARR & F C u (21.1) 4-7584 j� Wu. .rivrF WES HOUC PAS.. DINAN, P.C. tttptlwww.mun..chcorn Dc.l AS I AUS1 iN Wm-Fn.!,Dina T Dom. August 1, 1997 Mr. Greg Last Director of Planning City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave Southlake, TX 76092 RE: 0-1 Zoning on Ken Smith Land • Dear Greg. For your information and that of the City Council, I have included with this letter several background documents as well as the latest draft (and hopefully the final draft) of the proposed restrictions which Mr. Smith has agreed to place on his property. Through this process, I hope you will see that we have attempted to be as accommodating as reasonably possible to the homeowners and have attempted to answer all of their concerns but one, that being that these restrictions shall be in effect with respect to 0-1 zoning only. Specifically, I have enclosed the following: 1. A copy of a July 15 letter from Mr. Smith to the homeowners setting forth the basis of the understanding reached with the group. 2. A copy of a July 17 letter from the homeowners to Mr. Smith requesting clarification on some matters and the addition of several other matters. 3. A memo from Dick Ruschman, the attorney for Mr. Shafer, commenting on an initial draft of the proposed restrictions. 4. A copy of the most recent draft (as of the date of this letter) of the proposed restrictive covenants. LtlC; 7:0a688fLt8 -1p.12H q)sunN SS: ii : LO-T -8 :A8 11;3S • Mr. Greg Last August 1, 1997 Page 2 5. A copy of a proposed easement to be executed by each of the homeowners to allow the developer/office building owner to come onto their land to repair the masonry fence (as they requested that we be obligated to repair both sides, we need the authority to come onto their property in order to do so). After discussions this morning with Mr. Shafer, I understand that another homeowner's attorney has additional comments to the document. While we had hoped to deal with one spokesperson, we will be available to listen to his concerns and hope to be able to resolve them; however, as comments are continuing to come in, I am concerned about our ability to record a copy of the document prior to the meeting Tuesday night. While we are ready, willing and able to do so, it would not be prudent at this time knowing that there may be other unknown issues. We hope that if we are unable to do so, the council will understand our dilemma. We hope that this provides a fairly comprehensive review of the efforts taken by both sides to reach a satisfactory conclusion. Should you or any member of the council have any questions about the foregoing, please call me at your convenience. 11111 Very truly yours, Richard W. Wilhelm Encl. c: Bruce French Ken Smith John Levitt P1REAL14036121LAST LTR 8/1/97 e-_ q LUUC n:OLEG99t.Lt9 —IpJ214 usunx St:: ii LG-I -9 :A9 LN3S Jul-17-97 03: 19P . P-O2 III17 J�� l 1997 2: 43PM Dring AC ant Heat FAXI (972) 241-8916 PAGE 1 July 17, 1997 fo: Kenneth Smith P.O. Box 3 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Re: 0-1 zoning Dear Mr. Smith, In response to your letter of July 15, 1997,we request that the items covered under points 1,2 and 3 he drawn up as deed restrictions with the proper legal language to make them enforceable_ Additionally,a pictorial representation should he included showing the buffer yard,building setback line,the location of the masonry fence. • There are still a few issues which need to be resolved In recent cases,the average setback provided when 0-1 uses abut residential property in Southlake is 70 feet. Therefore,we feel we are being very reasonable in asking for a 50 foot setback. We also ask that durnpsters be restricted from placement between the building and our property line. Although you have promised to apply the same restrictions to lot 2, we request that the deed restrictions include lot 2 in case a future owner feels differently. Please expedite this matter in order for ow attorneys to have time to review and comment and to allow time for differences to be reconciled. In exchange for deed restrictions,we will revoke our opposition and recommend approval of the 0-1 zoning. Sincerely, Ken & Jennifer Shafer Lowell and Pamela Morrison Bobby and Darlene Struernpler W.A. Johnson • LIlf #:OLeGg9tLI9 -1pJe{{ usunw ' SC: II 1 LG-I -9 :A9 .L S 1 Jul -17-97 03: 19P _ P.03 • KENNETIH SMITH P.O. Box 3 Grapevine, Texan 76051 Ty: Lowell and Pamela Morrison Bobby and Darlene etruempler W.A. Johnson Ken and Jennifer Shafer Date: July 15, 1997 Re: Screening Wall on common boundary Dear Property Owners: As the owner of property adjacent to yours, and subject to my zoning request on the Smith Tract (attached as Exhibit '•A") being approved, i promise to accomplish and/or deed restrict to accomplish the following: 1 . Construct a six (6) foot masonry Lence along the western boundary of the Smith Tract on or before September 1, 1998. If, for any reason, the development project proceeds under the • approved zoning and plat by the City of Southlake and the fence project is not complete on or before September 1, 1998, then the adjacent property owners may individually or cooperatively file suit against me or the current owner to demand payment on a prorate share at the rate of $50.00 per linear foot along the common boundary, plus all court and attorneys coats as liquidated damages. The adjacent property owners may elect either to construct the fence directly or retain the amounts paid as liquidated damages. 2 . Upon final City approval of the 0-1 zoning classification for the four (4) platted lots abutting the adjacent property owner's tracts, all buildings will be constructed with pitched roof designs in order to keep a residential appearance. No flat roof construction will be allowed under the deed restrictions to be placed upon the sites. Any second story windows oriented toward the western property lines shall be constructed with non transparent glass block or frosted g?a:s materials. This requirement will allow natural light into second floor offices and eliminate any direct view from the proposed offices into the privacy of the neighbors property or homes . All buildins constructed within these 4 lots will require a minimum of 20 feet rear yard buffer zone from the rear property line, and a 35 foot building setback. Any exterior lighting located on the buildings or within the parking lot areas will be installed in a manner which reduces or eliminates any "bleed over" lighting into the adjacent owner's tracts. 3 . Z will agree to install evergreen plantings consisting of a minimum of 2' caliper in size, 8 foot in height and spaced • along the east side of the masonry wall at a minimum distance of 25 foot on center . The planting material shall complywith the standard list acceptable by the city of Southlake. Location and screening of ali trash dumpaters shall be in accordance with all requirements of the City. • Li/S # 0LC688tLI8 -tpJ4 9E:II L6-I -9 :Mg ,L13S SENT BY: 8- 1-97 : 11 :36 : Munsch Hardt-' 8174883370M 6;17 L �L 1111 4 tpAnr�»nn>>tt„»nHa►,�a�»� a Sr 31Y18 , xl9 nfid A!lY1AN t' * NOS13N NNV 'a s Uu4tu«uaa4444(4mikuig bs • sLxas 3o 412 S aLiL ao UP Ut o nd z 30N • . _kr �Yt L661" 'Ainf 70 A P WaS sTu4 aW 32IDz_78Q 01 NOMS tINY QHEi iDSErs a ax - L661 'AInI.' zo /cep yaS[ dya szgl uo paubts 'UoTleubrsap uTvwai e_aet3 eql )o Suiuoz agl se buoT en pale PazDa,'3a ayg .0g eves Tie 30 1.iPd r QPYILLaq ITT" arTwo.zd otgs ' V • b0'd dOZ=EO 46-LI- Lnr Jul -17-97 03:20P . P.05 0.it,-,J4**1".!.....,i 4.....-,,„;:.1.,".:". *14:/,41::(115\-$0..:1, lit„, "' • s 4 C V jr..0 `\ °«•' • •••r••wYn1. IMP Inq i..l' c. ) • l 7 V y 5 1 r. �G1r+ . '•‘)1‹,,. si Er• net uu c r \ \� / lI t �. ,;fit s 1 7 s ;,1- \ . • il. 'el C ,,„.vit''' it 1 ge..s. Sr 1 j_ I 'I I 3 I I I fl I h,197 t r I I ' ) CrMIIMC? A l /l. µtry„ I a I 67.Y1!tr I St Lr l53b •� I Cw,1Y• I 1 1 I • tombrut1 7C4 Oa I I \LID-Low OMWI '1• ._ 'Sties ( , 4 t\ i F. i ki 71 3 9 t. I, <1 � I 30 I a- ,--.I arm � x I IR I 0 In 0 priksuruct DR..f�. ■ r0• m Q , it • - zl�Up�l Nis 1 bb.07� s.r ►. sun s r 1 :I ppC i.r P� rn y �� T 111 I r 1 I . p1t 4MYG .,,/ 8— I I • • •• 1 I 7.t3.' •y � • • I rl r.1)0 O'E i 1 ]Io.11 0AMA YQRIN$ I l I I .,.0 PG 1034 1 d n n..r r or lire I I V01 IOS31I I LLDL Eel TE9 \n 6- F SI I al .�r:./K SCSI sr I /. — I 5 I 4 I 1 ' uNau S.F. I G i 4�5.175 t r ,� I 1 ) `�y! r d II 1 I I - — :1t or gilts i 'c — _ - __.- . -- _ . 4 ,, ., tebib'.�"t...ror -- I bD,,' 71 74• wl'Ib 1 'R. — SACHAkce flLVD .. - . ( } •4: I i • c�kn tie I / r~ - :t7�f11- _ ••T. j. -�J11,1h-' -- 4 c'J III.M Zr• ; ; tl ..;.. t 3TTu iiil Id. rlr \ s L iY ~ r PIZ011RLC• i �r�' 7 t t' f1 ALTt;RNiTE ) a�I �tIC3 sr d t \ ) `'vr Y r/ . 4 _ _ ` t • .IR rr.. -a—, a-.o __ - 110 f1p' - 1K d 51 r' ' rL GOA - / �. I 7s4. • b. .,,. y 0 D.R.,tl,..rr $ IIFRILel INXIINN. IdiD AO ° MAI MO LW.>IIDr srtt'ti I t 1 vol 3!t-!t 7,M. tI , _--- ® L • 12 Ci I Io►eo R wvurw iv,,... LI/L #:OLE6886Li8 —'P- H y�sunw LE:it L6 i 8 :A9 .L\3S /—Lti—I / y=5 JAh1 t-KUM N1UNL;r-1 MAKU I L I a o55 i 5da r. L 28 Jul 1997 7: 18AM Dring AC and Neat FAX: (972) 241-9816 ?AGE PRJ1: .ivTKEN P.C. FAX No.' 472 713 8790 87-25-S7 es:41P P.92 • RICHARD C. RUSCFNAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 15950 DAM Parkway,Sauta 1090 Dallas,lama 753494914 aonxD cmYTWmD.c I4Mma+etA1_s$AL MUATB r97'4 112-1421 `t TEXAS BOARD Of IZGAL 913C1ALtZATfON TeLEcornat 0721?IS-MO { Doc; July 25, 11997 2J'4--4TS5".-75'8,`i To; Rick Wilhelm Pas;f:- - -6646-- Toad No. of Puritits (Inebstiiat this Cava Page)_ 2 If you did not receive all of the pages Indicated, please call (972) 7324621. ...r.a,«srs...aa,.•r•+rv.+�r.Mrtitu.�•srsr0r*a�tarirrk++.rrss,�ciYiassOsta�Rir�ta Re: Dear Rick Ken Shaffer asked me to look at your draft Declaration of Restrictions. My comments are as follows: 410 1. Refe erne that the restrictions are covenants running with Cue bnd for the benefit of the four scljacent lot owner s and their svccesos. Reference that any one lot owner may enfo4e the restrictions. Provide ttm1 remedies include (i) Injunctive relief, (ii) damages, (iii) right to construct and repair the fence and impose a lien on the restricted a= for the cost t c ooi, and (v)attorneys foes. Delete mediation rdatance. 2. Provide than restrictions become effective upon passage of Southlake City Ordinance 480-,46 by vote of the city council and may be amended of vacated only by writl tt instzyment signed by owners of the four adjacent lots; eibenque tt mining of the remitted area Li not relevant. Add rercnoe that lot owners will be recording this inset-meet before such ordinance is passed_ 3. Add representation n that Mr. Smith and Mrs. Smith are malty authorized to execute the insulunestt and encumber the restricted arm and dtai the are no monetary or nan- monetary liens etiCIZTaticring the restricted area. 4. sjw/fy that the brick wall will be constructed solely of brick, and that construction of the wall will ensure continued adequate drainage of surface wallas from the four Ida onto and ova the restricted area. provide drat the owner of the restricted area will have an ongoing obligation to maintain the fence and drain . Ctrf.001 1I REC'D AUG 011997 2 /-26-1 997 9:59AM FROt l P IUNSCH HARDT 214 85S 758d P. 3 ' 2B Jul 1997 7: 18AM Dring AC and Heat FAX: (972) 241-8816 PAGE 2 cc is NVTKEM P.G. FAX NO. ' 972 713 0790 97-23-17 04,421, F.03 • Rick Wilhelm July 25, 1997 Page 2 5. Revi.. enlarge the map to show the building and policing Setback lines, brick wall locstti , and trash container location. Add building height restriction of 35 fat, and roof • ton nuaimum of 3/12. Revise window restriction: all windows other than those .: • dicular to the piopetzy line or those located on the ground floor of any building will • reply with the restriction. Add 35-foot height restriction for light poles, cellular • , microwave towers, radio towers and electrlwl l}zncs, none of which would be perin}..— wither the fifty-foot setback area. limit eatesior lights intensity within the restri.'_• area to 250 watts. Give me call once you have discussed these comments with Mr. Smith. Sinnerdy yours, Richard C. Ruxhman itcx::h • e,47-oa1•, REGD AUG 011997 � � - ICE • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS TIIE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS,John Kenneth Smith(the"Declarant")is the owner of the land more particularly described on Exhibit A,attached hereto and made a part hereof,and shown on Exhibit B,attached hereto and made a part hereof(the"Restricted Tract"); WHEREAS,Declarant desires to rezone a portion of the Restricted Tract from its current zoning of AG Agricultural District("AC")to 0-1 Office District("0-1")under and pursuant to thc ordinances of the City of Southlake,Texas(the"City"); WHEREAS, Declarant desires to accommodate requests of owners of other lands adjacent to the Restricted Tract by imposing certain development criteria on the Restricted Tract such that if the portion of the Restricted Tract currently zoned AG is rezoned(and only if it is rezoned)pursuant to Ordinance H480-246 to 0-1,and to thc extent that the Restricted Tract remains 0-1 zoning,the developers,owners and tenants of the improvements on the Restricted Tract shall be subject to these development criteria and conditions. • NOW THEREFORE,the Declarant declares that the Restricted Tract is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants and restrictions hereinafter set forth. 1. ) ffectiveness. This Declaration is effective only with respect to thosc portions of the Restricted Tract which are zoned 0-1 under the ordinances of the City and only for so long as they arc zoned as such. If Ordinance H480-246 for the rezoning of the Restricted Tract is not finally approved by the City by August 6, 1997,this Declaration shall automatically terminate and shall be of no further force or effect for all portions of the Restricted Tract. These covenants and restrictions shall affect only improvements constructed or to be constructed within 0-1 zoning on the Restricted Tract,that is, if the zoning on a lot or lots within the Restricted Tract is changed from an 0-1 zoning,this Declaration shall terminate and no longer be effective for that lot or those lots,but it shall remain in effect for the remainder of the Restricted Tract. 2. Protective Covenants. The following provisions shall be applicable to any and all buildings constructed,renovated, or added within the Restricted Tract: • a. Minimum Rear Yard SethackLines. No building shall be placed within 50 feet of the rear property tine of any lot within the Restricted Tract. • RESTRICTIONS--CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK 1 LI/6 #:OLCG99 LI9 -'P-' H Vs¢nK : LC:it : L6-t -9 :AS .L'\2S • b. Buffer Yard. No parking shall be allowed within 20 feet of the rear property line of any lot within the Restricted Tract(the"Buffer Yard"). The Buffer Yard shall he utilized as a green space area and only uses consistent therewith may be carried on within the Buffer Yard area. c. Design Retirements. Each building constructed on any lot within the Restricted Tract shall meet the tbllowing requirements: (i) Subject to the terms of and the exceptions contained in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City,the building shall not exceed 35 feet in height. (ii) The building shall he constructed with a pitched roof generally consistent with a residential appearance, but with not less than a 3:12 pitch. No flat roofs will be allowed except for porticos, canopies and similar improvements which are located in the front or side yards. (iii) Roof mounted antennas,dish antennas or other communication reception or transmitting devices exceeding 3 feet in diameter shall be screened from ground-level view at a point or points within 35 feet from and at the same elevation as the bottom of the foundation of the building. • (iv) Other than for the first lot within the Restricted Area(to be known as Lot 2 of the Cornerstone Business Park),and if located in occupiable space of the building,any windows oriented toward the single family lots west of and adjacent to the Restricted Tract(the "SF Lots")which arc not on the first floor of the building and which are not perpendicular to the rear property line,shall be constructed with translucent glass or other materials such as glass block or frosted glass which eliminate a clear,undistorted view from inside the building to such single family residences on the SF Lots. (v) Exterior lighting located on the side or rear of the building or within the side or rear parking areas shall be bulbed with lighting fixtures not exceeding 250 watts and shall be installed in a manner which reduces or eliminates any"bleed over" lighting into the SF Lots. d. 'Towers and Poles. Other than utility poles or towers,within the Restricted Area,no tower,light pole, cellular tower,microwave tower or radio tower shall exceed 35 feet in height or shall be located within the rear yard of the respective lot. e. Trash Dwupsters. Trash areas or dumpstcrs for the buildings within the Restricted Tract shall be screened and located within the side yard of the respective lot, but not closer to the rear property line than the rear yard building setback line. • RESTRICTIONS--CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK 2 e- )- LI/OI#:OLC699fLI9 -Ivan q)sunw : A :II : Lt;-t -R :zQ tic • 3. Landscaping. By no later than the completion of construction f building v.a i,uii�iiig on a lot within the Restricted Tract, their shall have been planted within the Buffer Yard of such lot, evergreen trees or shrubs not more than 25 feet apart which are not less than a 2 inch caliper and no less than 8 feet in height. Any such tree or shrub selected for planting shall comply with the standard listing of acceptable plants as established from time to time by the City. 4. Masonry Fence. By no later than September 1, 1998 (the"Completion Date"), Declarant or the owners of the respective lots within the Restricted Tract shall have construct/al a 6 foot high stamped concrete fence along the western boundary of the Restricted Tract which takes into account and provides for the continued natural flow of surface waters front the SF Lots through the Restricted Tract;however,the fencing shall commence at a point south of Crooked Lane which is considered by the City to be safe for visibility and traffic flow. If the fence is built in more than one phase,the fence shall be of consistent design and construction. If the fence is not built by the Completion Date, then the sole and exclusive remedies available to any party seeking to enforce this covenant against the owners of the lots within the Restricted Tract which have not constructed the fence shall he to either(a)bring an action against such lot owner to compel construction of the fence,or(b)make demand against such lot owner for the liquidated amount of$50.00 per linear foot of fence on such owner's land which is not constructed and the damaged party(ies)may either(i)enter upon the Restricted'tract to complete the fence at their cost and expense,or(ii)retain the liquidated amount as full compensation for any damages—all other actual,compensatory,punitive and consequential damages being waived. The owners of • the lots within the Restricted Tract shall he responsible for the repair and maintenance of the face of the fence facing into such lot. If all owners of the SF Lots provide to the Declarant and subsequent owners an acceptable easement for entry onto their respective lot for repair of the SF Lot-side of the fence, the owners of the lots within the Restricted Tract shall be jointly and severally responsible for repairs of an extraordinary n_rt1Fe to the SF Lot-side of the fence, however, in any case,neither Declarant nor any subsequent owners shall be responsible or liable for(x)repairs for damage to the SF Let-side of the fence caused by or attributable to other than natural forces or a change in drainage from the SF Lots,or(y)the day-to-day or other normal maintenance thereof. 5. Duration. These covenants and restrictions shall terminate and be of no further effect with respect to any lot within the Restricted Tract or, as appropriate,ilS to the Restricted Tract as a whole,upon the earlier to occur of u. The rezo—'^g of the respective lot or all lots within the Restricted Tract to a use other than 0-1 (Office District): b. As to any lots within the Restricted Tract which arc adjacent to and contiguous with the respective adjacent single family lot to the west of the Restricted Tract,the rezoning of such single family lot for a commercial or retail use; c. T}1C agreement by each lot owner within the Restricted Tract and each lot • RF. TRICTIO*ic--CORNERSTOO NE B';SINESS "'RK 3 1e-i3 LiliI:OLC699tLi8 .-1pJe4 q)Sflly : 9C:II : La-I -R :I9 10K • • owner of the single family tracts adjacent to the Restricted Tract. 6. F.nforccrcnt. The covenants and restrictions herein set forth may be enforced by Declarant,one or more of the owners of thc lots within the Restricted Tract,or the owners of the SF Toots and,except as limited hereby, all remedies at law or in equity shall be available. The attorneys`fees and costs of thc prevailing party in any dispute between(i)the Declarant and/or the owners of one or more of the lots in the Restricted Tract,on the one hand,and(ii)one or more of the owners of an SF Lot,on the other hand,shall be paid by the non-prevailing party. Upon the transfer of title by Declarant of the Restricted Tract,or the transfer by the subsequent owner(s)to a future owner,the transferee shall be fully released from liability under this Declaration, i.e.only the person or entity then owning the land or lots may be subject to an action to enforce any portion of this Declaration. 7. Authority. The undersigned warrants and represents that he has full authority to execute this Declaration and to encumber the Restricted Tract without the joinder of any other person or entity. 8. Captions. The titles, heading and captions which have been uses throughout this Declaration are for convenience only and are not to be used in construing this Declaration or any part hereof. • • RESTR CTR)Nn CO.. n.t�.iiviv�v--t,vtcNF.i(j T VNF.BUSINESS PARK 4 LI/ZI#tOLE699fLI9 .-ipieN tlpsunW : GC:II ` LG-I -9 :A9 J S • EXECIJTEI)as of the date first above written. John Kenneth Smith 'LEE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of July, i 997,by John Kenneth Smith. Notary Public for the State of Texas Printed Name: My Commission Expires: • • RE'STRICTlONS--CORN ERSION"• vc BuSINi:SS PARK LI/CI#:OLC688tLi8 .-113-eH VsunN t 6E:II : LG-I -8 :A8 .LN0S • 1 FIELD NOTES FOR r vA 7.81 ACRES TR CT t\tJJ 1S\t•9 1 (PROPOSEn TOTS 2-6, BLOCK 2) 2N THE PROPOSED CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT CO. , TEXAS Being a portion of those tracts of land in the THOMAS EASTER Survey Abstract No. 424, in the city of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of those same tracts of land described in deeds recorded in Volume 6282, Page 671, and Volume 9755, Page 1297, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R. ,P.Co. ,Tx. ) and further being the proposed Lots 2 through 6, Block 2 of the proposed Cornerstone proposed Business Park and is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a fence corner being the southwest L being �ilive5t corner of the tract described in Volume 6282 Page 57, D.R. ,T.Co. ,Tx. , �,1, and being by deed call 1095.6 feet East of the most Westerly said Survey and from which said point a inch Southwestn cbyner et i iron rod by a set stone bears West 4.0 feet; • THENCE North 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West along West the West line of the tract described in Volume 6282; PAge 671 , D.R. m Tx. , and the East line of a tract described in deeds in Volume 10335, Page 1036, and Volume 6826, Page 565, D_R_ _T.Cn m,. 1,224.15 feet to a point in the proposed south right-of-wayof Crooked Lane; THENCE North 42 degrees 14 minutes 31 seconds East along said proposed south right-of-way, 105.85 feet to a point; THENCE continuing along said proposed right-of-way North 53 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, 154.75 feet to a point for the most northerly corner of the proposed Lot 2, Block 2 of said proposed Cornerstone Business Park; THENCE departing said ht departing N��l��=u i iyciL"OL—way South 37 degrees 30 minutes 16 seconds East, V to 254.05 a F,)()jnt, THENCE South 52 degrees minutes 44 d._ degrees--- 29 .__......�� ���V��u. WCSt, 37.43 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of "'y�'�•�+•�y a curve to the left having a central angle of 52 degrees 43 minutes A • seconds radius of 180.00 feet; • Lllb1r'OL:G99tLI9 -ipJeH us¢nw ! MIT : LG-I -8 :AO L' S • Page Two 7.81 ACRES TRACT PROPOSED CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK THENCE Southerly along said curve to the left an arc distance of 16565. tr_ • feet to �11C point of tangency; THENCE South 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West, 856.02 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 29 degrees 13 minutes 06 seconds and a radius of 270.00 fee*; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 137.69 feet to tha point of tangency; • THENCE South 28 degrees 59 minutes 06 eg seconds West, 43.23 feet to a point in the south line of said tract described in deed +o -�+Ldeod in Volume 6282, Page 671, D.R. ,T.Co. ,Tx. , THENCE; North 89 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds West along said south property line, 195.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and g containin 7.81 acres of land. containing • 7e- I -7 LuSi7:OLE699f7LT9 _1P1eH y)s¢nic : WTI : L6-I -9 :A9 L.L3S • // :7 1 ,6 r �9,ilf �l:a te . / \ / / 1 N �' .7 1 \\ , 4, 4 ; _,- - sir, . ,,Vz.,\ \ j � * , I. / . —! 7 �\ .41..- \ ,- / . --- - tz ix 44- i- • T Damprwa-r M0. •H tOONnol , C.wmp q ao[IIn 1 NN r I Tµ-.-.. •.d0.21'I II 1 I. �•R fL..h .. I11....../�` is or .M ' i t''' -- i - 1( ill. oci h mope.4 1 OANt.. o�ic..KC MS.n� f p 1. • it f si I I I Um ,a r •� �.. .a III- 0 I j l 1 �.".r " I I I, ., . . UO COL o t: ``l ` iII ll 4 i I t I I , I I 1I i e-3*tw,,l_ LLrLL 1 �. 1.. f_ 1� EYCHANCE ALVD. • r i a.►��tr�11RYL..:. e\ �. rYa :�b 1-� �3' J AREA iY Tioi� �;T WIN 1♦ • t fITHIiv SPECIAL • -�•r �o as , '- 12 DEED RESTRICTIONS ic.COO N 42 W - IN PL)g. — �� (1- CRNF'�? cTO��E �._._. . 21. 1d7 54:I4► BUSINESS PARK TMF-......------.....70.SE'I AN iITIO to ■.ara�u„rr Q-....3fr22•44 w °!? ,. !. 1.r7.►.rr. L - —fae.2_ THE Ci ry OF Origin i r _ "r"'". o :�ca1e l 2D11' b 1 SOUTHLAKE _ tur- -i-t0_ Q TgRiuil OLJN'l'Y i I faGrnphtc Scele in Fcct d 1i,Y 21, 1997 '•DRC42.D�Yt 4I/9i :OL6'6886Li8 .1PieR tpsunyy : Ot: II : L6-I -8 :AS .L1(3S 4110 FENCE,MAINTENANCE EASEMENT STATE Ol. TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF 1'ARR1 'f § That and "Owner , * — _(collectively,the , the owner of that certain parcel of land(the"Owner Property")more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof,for good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby confirmed,have GRANTED AND CONVEYED and by these presents do hereby GRANT AND CONVEY to ("Grantee"), its successors and assigns,a perpetual,non-exclusive easement on,ovcr,across and upon the Owner Property for the purpose of,with reasonable prior notice,access to that certain masonry fence now or hereafter owned, whether in whole or in part,by Grantee, its successors or assigns, located adjacent to the Owner Property and for the purpose of constricting,repairing,demolishing,and rebuilding such masonry fence,such casement to be an easement appurtenant to that certain tract of property more particularly described on kxh jit B attached hereto and made a part hereof(as well as each lot therein contained);provided, however, nothing herein contained shall act to make Grantee or its successors or assigns responsible for repairing or maintaining such fence,such matters being as set forth in that curtain Declaration of Restrictions dated _, 1997,and recorded in Volume Page_ —� S , Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas. in the event Grantee exercises its rights tinder this easement,Grantee shall,at its sole cost and expense(i)indemnify and hold Owners harmless from all actual(but not compensate or punitive)damage or injury to persons or property caused by or attributable to Grantee's entry or ry Grantee's work on thu fence,and(ii)promptly repair and restore all damage to the Owner Property • caused by such exercise. EXECUTED asof the_ day of 1997 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COI NW OI,TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of July, 1997,by and Notary Public for the State of Texas Printed Name: My Commission Expires: ,,�. D:\RPA . t4v3o',i1FSiy►T./n ljT 7/3ni9? • LI/LI#:OLCG99'L19 .-1p1ej y)sunw : It:ii LG-I -9 :AEI .WS ..._• . , . -•-' '••' 3Er,1 . INlWie liN5i•-fi9l1 liSP M.Z,' •iik,r4-1q111.,11 —.1 T..pl*_. 4...,..-....-. :=;--.1.7--- -t L---L-e:-:-7-i•-..-..-M...?-rr.:--. 4-1: 1-- /i .— _ LI ."..., 99• ..--:::.,'1': !7:'..-r::'--r-7: .. . ' . ,,HAN niamammrs- 60-litT-- . _ crs_ ,1 ., ,..,- .: ,.:,.,,-,..-:-I.:- . . ... . 51.11WII ,4.../04 2 1,1 :iiii.allompim I- • : : 111:-.;.' -p ,•,•-i-f0-,L,L, . i - - •i ,• .! -II- 1 .A •OMIN • r 7• ,,' ..:: :::- I%• ,e ..._ ,A.'. -- 1 ,;‘. —r.....,;:a r,e \ 'pimpLi$70711111111111111 3.. , ., - .04firpu, . .dr-- , ... \ ‘ . . . ..". . .. . ...._ ••4441.,oll.4.1114,4 ne:11...E44 2K ea aliillismi --._ . . . . . . 7 :imiiiii _ tf,_. in tAKE . , ---R • . ., .., 1.-- • i •__ analli•MMil ,CO....._. _. lb 5412C A 111 -AG gf _ 58213 S9ZA 2A1B I II 1 t. AIM! EA 3TER EE3 i .1111=1:11111 'a iez 1 :...i. • -14EY A-456 _ e I .1 NOR TH WES T---- . .'." .41.U"El e A PKWY a•s T 1 ._. MORMINIMINIA .-..- r rwAiiminilllin 3. ip• I I : :p. . a i i 9 i . :172.•,..-..,---1.-----!rio... • me 2E8 GRA rr ION 1•41. 1,..., •-•-•_.1 mAir . 1 '2E11 V4Q411%, • ADP i'f' i I 1. blitt •LA ,A 363 Ell •-•-•-.-Y1.5. 1----_____i_____:::_, !In,1..! ifillgalit.1.5 L..... ZES 44,40004usiii SWIMS-ME 81.,4). ---,, -------..•------ i •:4 3 i i i tgl i4:,Zi i a I i . a MICHWAY , !3 mu We 18 • i.........,_____4__________I ,1465 , A x I . . . . . i•If:olt... AM me IS k '---- • • . lab, 0 IP 'IP lig...-A i Rs- ' 411ebiori.- i . la ee lb- IN% r:1). 1205 2n3.41 'kali% 7 ,,, i jr1 .--.. lei i 2A2 .64, --'-v - /,' ! • - V 2A 2A3 2A.2A 2AIA '4:i 6A/A1 1111 i 2 2A1B att‘ i 3 Ac 331 ....,..---• i . . ..... i i ...1 Si --• L.- -4 ( 'Ff'- .....-- IC ! 2AI 41110,../. -___ *L...." 2A.94 Z 3.4 ,..,..... „....„1 30 1 ‘°'' 12.09 Ac --• 1: 16 ; <• ,----- ___-- - i 9 i TIE ...A \ ,.. .... ,...., i • ._..... : • . ,,,, SLAW. A-074 i i --- _____.I _ 116 Ac I ?: • itrIc)(5--' 5 —OA, , • . . c.; ,,, , •. II frs - 1ID I roll' ... 33 I : EA- 66 7.27 ' 49 4A1 --I-. .-i" j a' - • G I 7 --.I: e __ i i 9 I j i j tr... 1 9 • 444 . I j i ..— l‘---___- ! - IZK "-- I I i i i . fp 4 ;" a i i i . i i • ffl t-- 7 ID4. 1105A1 I 1 38-' -5---'--3 ---------- 1 e GRAPEVINE MY LIM T 0 1„ 3 Ac 6.15 At ..--------: ( I w e . ......, 4L. .. , rfc•Eal p pA -"W- ". 67,1/4 It 1 •s x 1 1 I • \1 \ ! ! I ._.—g1,14. McDONAL.D.,--....,_! • ._. _.....-- \ \sawn' A-4013 I 1 5izirAG 1. al \ , i H ( Ilk • A,__. : .. Amu mitc2 15.6 k \' 2.• .1,.,;, ‘.1 N, - - :I WA2 REIM:Tia . - •• C.12 ;-.' tm*L21118 116E ' IlLABB . „--,.,-- 45 17,11.44:11140 we s Luise 19e, TRACT MAP _ :, ... 1 4 NI 04Arr1011 AP9 .--- 11 . male vie: Qin '01..CA FrIaMil I ..-, ' : I IA A IA - , 4A 2 A• (' EOM, P Z em $12-9, ____il e,,,, i 1 •,,---"-i' 1 1 I I f TR 2A18 1.237 @ TR 2A1A L525 AC 3125 O TR.3A E .766 @ TR 2A2A TR 2A1TR2ASC 1: 6.79 AC 2.493 @ 99 O IA .110 TR 2 AC TR ZA, GOP ,744 AC 2.493 O TR 2C .361 AC • TR it / 5.93 AC TR.3A 7.229 @ .NI 2N TR 11A 7 AC ,:57 AC (....._/'''`N FASTER T �R‘iE TR IIA SA"�7 7 AC S TR11E —•---_._._._.__x...,_______ --- 16.96AC • • SF-1A 611 a 0 K. SCHAFFER o \ CC r � \ TR 5A TR 11D3 �' 16.46 AC �J a 2 Q��� 9 G MM v i)11111/ �� TR 5 ti OO QJ 'Y 1 .503 AC r co 5� - 10 O� Z ZE co 1 I ) h TR CC3 r� % 2.5 0 I 11 / . . EL I EX( I.JOHNSON \/. - 5 a 22 _ — 22 a,.,_ «— SI— — �f11lTH1-A{C-1 AG .'I HERITTR AL OUSTPIA L GRAPEVINE C G . jNV pAI TAGE ARK 3 'IVO n ,5 ERI P C: \18 CITY OF GRAPEVINE C B. R. WALLACE 6RACN. �1I ,� I 3 � , r o` 1 � It .-.1.;. (I) 1 1111 ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING 91)-;^ c� '-;2 SPIN #7 DARRFLL FAGLIE • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-246 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.63 ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 5 AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person • or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-246.W PD Page 1 1 S changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those Swho bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, Sis hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES1480-246.WPD Page 2 S Being a 5.63 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "0- 1" Office District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development S of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any • and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-246.W PD Page 3 until final disposition by the courts.• Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-246.WPD Page 4 l J�,�,/ • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: i1 CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-246.W PD Page 5 11110 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a fence corner being the Southwest corner of said tract and being by deed call 1,095.6 feet East of the most westerly Southwest corner of said survey and ifom which said point a 5/8 inch iron pin by a set stoke bears West 4.0 feet. THENCE North 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West along the West line of said tract and the East line of a tract described in deeds in Volume 10335, Page 1036, and Volume 9499, Page 760, 923.70 feet to the Northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 70 degrees 58 minutes 06 seconds East, departing said West line 305.51 feet to the'Northeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 09 degrees 23 minutes 57 seconds West 50.20 feet to a point; • THENCE, South 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds East 774,65 feet to the Southeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West 28000 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 5.63 acres. S L:\C TYDOC S\O RD\CASES\480-246.W PD Page 6 '�^ City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-083 PROJECT: First Reading/ Ordinance No. 480-249 Rezoning and Concept Plan/T.W. King Water Storage Tank& Telecommunication Tower STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as 4.5 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. LOCATION: West side of T. W. King Road approximately 700' south of the intersection of West Bob Jones Road and T. W. King Road. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: One (1) response has been received within the 200' notification area: • William Lamoreaux, 6967 Blackwood Dr., Dallas, TX 75231-5 703,opposed. "The 401'transmission tower will be detrimental to future development of homes. A similar proposition was defeated in June 1994." P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) allow variance to requirement# 1 a (bufferyards ); 2) allow variance to requirement # lb (landscape area and plantings); 3) allow variance to requirement# 1 f(tower compound should be enclosed with either an 8' solid screening fence, 8' • masonry wall, or a combination wrought iron fence with an eight (8') foot evergreen hedge); City of Southlake,Texas 4) allow requirement # 1 c (proposed tower is a lattice-type) to discretion of engineers. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-083ZC.WPD S City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM III July 31, 1997 REC'D J U L 3 01997 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Rezoning and Concept Plan for T.W. King Water Storage Tank and TelecommunicationTower On July 17, 1997, Mr. Eddie Cheatham and Deputy Director John Knight presented to the P&Z Commission, a request for Rezoning and Concept Plan of the Public Safety Tower at the T.W. King water tower site. Chris Carpenter stated that the City had issued ten notification letters to Southlake property owners with one response which was opposed to the plan. He further reported that the City had notified the City of Trophy Club with a courtesy letter of the plan. It should also be noted that Denton County Commissioner Army, the Mayor of Trophy Club and the Trophy Club Department of Public Safety were made aware of these plans, especially since they were being initiated from the Denton County Commissioners Court. During the work session there was only one question asked regarding the plan. The Commissioner 0 asked if the City Council was aware of the proposed height of the tower when they were presented with the proposed project. Deputy Director Knight's response was they had been made aware on several occasions. There was no other discussion during the work session. During the meeting, the discussion of the project led to a concern as to whether the tower could possibly fall on nearby residences. It was explained that the type of proposed construction of the tower was built in a lattice design of ten foot sections and was engineered in a manner that, should it fall, it would collapse within itself, as opposed to falling in any type of straight line from the base. The commission would not grant a variance regarding the two to one set-off requirement, although the height that they granted for the 165' water tower which was also approved, is also not in compliance with this set-off portion of the ordinance. After some discussion, and Karen Gandy explaining that the City of Trophy Club had received a courtesy letter notifying them of the plan, it is our understanding that Denton County and County Commissioners of this area have met with Trophy Club officials on numerous occasions regarding this site. A motion was made and passed that approved the water tower on this site, as submitted, to be 1.5 million gallons elevated to 165'. The motion passed restricting the communications tower to 120', 45' shorter than the water tower that sits closer to the Trophy Club property. Additionally, the motion stated that they would not grant a variance of the two to one set-off requirement of the ordinance and they would not grant a variance of this type of construction. They did,however, state that this could be determined by the engineers as to whether it should be a monopole or lattice type tower. There was one individual,Mr. William Lamorieaux, that appeared in opposition to the tower. After the vote on the Concept Plan, S Deputy Director Knight presented the Special Use Permit for this site. It passed with the same exceptions as stated in the Concept Plan. There was no discussion or opposition to the Special Use Permit. ') r"_Z s July 31, 1997 • Page 2 When we first began this project with Denton County,we had several meetings with the Council to discuss our intentions and to make sure that Council was aware of all of the issues, including the height of the tower, which was probably the most predominant issue. We were operating and making decisions in compliance with Ordinance 480. It states in Section 33.5 paragraph, as amended by Ordinance No. 480-U, that communications antennas or communications structures, utility poles, towers, and water tanks are exempt from height restrictions if owned by a government entity. This project had first been presented to Council during Mid-Year Retreat of 1996. After working an agreement with Denton County and having attorneys from both City and County agree on the wording, Council voted and approved a contract in April 1997. The Department feels that the safety of its Fire and Police Officers, and the citizens that may require the services of the Department of Public Safety,plus the enhanced cost savings,present an enormous incentive to re-address the height issue. We recommend that the maximum height be 401', with the understanding that the tower will probably be approximately 380'. As a side note, the Colleyville paper erroneously reported that Deputy Director Knight stated, if the tower was reduced, it would not interfere with reception and transmission. The actual response, according to the Minutes of the P&Z Meeting, was that if the tower was reduced by just 100', it would shorten the range of transmission and reception by 12 to 14 miles. • I am available if you have any comments or questions. bn,.‘' ..„ , S _7i, LI City of Southlake,Texas • NIENIORANDUNI July 8, 1997 To: Karen Gandy, Community Development From: John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services Subject: T.W. King Site We are requesting the ordinance variances on the above listed site for several reasons. For the past two years we have been negotiating with both the City of Fort Worth and the County of Denton on this site. Because of its elevation and location in the city it is the optimal site to provide radio service for public safety communications for our community. The problem we face is poor and often a total lack of capability of transmitting information from the 9-1-1 center to police and fire services. This hinders the effective operation of these emergency services in providing swift and efficient responses to the needs of our community. Further it endangers the 411 lives of the emergency service employees providing these services. An example of this would be a large structure fire that occurred on N. White Chapel. Because of the poor radio capability we endangered several firemen because they could not communicate with each other. We were forced to send people from location to location to exchange information to keep from getting someone seriously hurt. On several occasions police officers have been out on traffic stops and disturbance calls where they unable to communicate for assistance or back up units. Fortunately we have not had an officer injured because of the lack of radio coverage. We have experienced problems with being able to communicate with Care flight. This has caused delays in getting them on the ground and delayed the transport of members of the community to the hospital. In this agreement with Denton County they will provide us the use of their system at no cost in exchange for the use of the above mentioned land. They will also build the tower and provide for all of the associated cost at their expense. At the present time we are operating on the City of Fort Worth's system. The coverage is still not effective to eliminate areas in the city where we have problems communicating between field units Sand he 9-1-1 center. Also on this system we have to pay a fee for every radio that is placed on the system. If we stay on this system it will cost the city in excess of$100,000 for the use of the REC'D J U L 0 8 1997 • system next year. This figure does not include the cost of the radio equipment itself. Over the next three years with our expected growth, we expect to pay in excess of$250,000 to the City of Fort Worth for the use of a system that does not give us satisfactory coverage. I can not stress enough that this particular site is the very best for radio coverage in this immediate area. That the necessity of better coverage is essential for the safety and security of our community and employees. Please advise if I may be of further assistance in this or any other matter. ,77 /jk cc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety S S RECD J U L 0 8 1997 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 1, 1997 To: Karen Gandy, Community Development From: John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services Subject: Proposed Tower Site T.W. King The following are responses to your letter dated 6/19/97. 9. • A. I am unable to provide drawings at this time. The tower and building have not gone out for bid. However, the request will be for the tower to be constructed of galvanized metal which will allow for more effective maintenance. The supporting structure will be pre-fabricated type structure with concrete/gravel type outside wall finish. The only wiring exposed will be that necessary to extend between the antenna's and the radio • storage building. • B. Attached are copies of the propagation maps that were provided to us from Motorola who is the vendor for the radio equipment for this project. Originals have been requested. • C. Chris Carpenter with your division requested and was provided with an overhead view of the property and surrounding area which shows the adjoining houses from the city GIS division. • D. Again the above mentioned view will provide adequate information as to the density of the surrounding vegetation. It indicates the bottom of the site is completely obstructed by trees and brush that already exists on the site. Our proposed fence is chain link construction 8' in height with 2' of barbed wire security on top of the chain link. The fence will be equipped with an alarm to detect invasion of the location. The entire ground area inside of the security fence will be covered with rock. The reason is to provide easier maintenance of the facility and a safer environment within the compound area. • E. The lighting that is being bid is for FCC/FAA approved low intensity white strobe lighting that is less intrusive to the surrounding residences. • F. Backhaul is not applicable for this site. This system is for public safety • communications only. REC'D - 11997 1 • • G. Certificates of insurance will be provided once a contractor has been selected. 10. While the ordinance calls for monopole type construction, towers of this proposed height are safer if they are constructed in the lattice type design. While the proposed tower is a free standing type which will have no guy wires, it is designed to collapse into itself in the event of structure failure. 11. The reason for requesting a variance on the height of the tower is for one reason. This tower and radio system is being designed to provide service strictly for the use of city and county governments in this immediate area. This site will service the entire public safety departments for all of the south end of Denton County and the North end of Tarrant County. Not only will it provide for the use of a radio system for the Denton County Sheriff's Department and the City of Southlake, but for Trophy Club and Roanoak as well. Both of these neighboring communities operate now on the Denton County system. 12. Because of the limitation of the property itself we can not meet the requirement of a two for one set off. We therefore request a waiver of this requirement. As stated above these types of towers are designed to collapse into itself in the event of structural failure. The reason for this site is imperative because of the height of the property allows for construction of the project with a minimum expense to the taxpayers of the involved entities. And it allows for the maximum radio coverage needed by the various public safety departments to provide life safety services. 13. As stated above this type of construction will be required in the bid process which will be • provided once the contract has been awarded. 14. The FCC/FAA applications have been completed and are being processed. Once approval has been received a copy of the licenses and approvals will be provided to you. 15. Again as stated above the fence will meet the code with the exception of the type of construction. We are proposing the use of chain link of 8' in height with an additional security top of 2' of barbed wire for security. The reason for the request of variance is due to the security alarm system for this site. This type of construction allows for needed construction material to properly operate the alarm system should an attempt to intrude the area occur. 16. The height of the equipment building proposed is 10'. This will meet the standards set out by the ordinance. 17. I am aware that a"High Voltage" sign and a Knox Box will be needed as part of this installation. These requirements will be met. Please advis if I may be of further assistance in this matter. JK/jk / IIIcc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety le •" 0 H co A- ,_. , .. 9 , 0>lit j). [ i di r 1 - of \ . , 4,......_ t 4, S ao, i, ' *' \ - kr- '..4-4,.. AO _ — kit \Ne=--'° ' vi,,icf? o Aim � ���� __Ita3 T \ r 1 J -_ sIGPt sip.‘is. 1 .. t i tc,II...1 i 1 • TRACT MAP - 3 Irr- 1 -[\ I N i I , • , I II/ ' I 11 1 A G TR 9 \\ ''''''>'N':' A 16.32 AC 1 M. GILBERT M. GILBERT N/ 9 2 , I TR 8 Aug 92 I 4.43 AC Y` I ' I 0 o cq M. GILBERT E' TR 19 4 AC 21 14 AC A G •• AG I . E. J. JONES S Ia TR 20 AG 2 AC L. JOHNSON II TR 2 - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II II 1.00 AC R. SAVAGE AG I AG AG I 'I i W. LAMOREAUX tI W. LAMOREAUX I t TR 1 TR.2 • 15.62 1 ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING SPIN #1 CARA WHITE I . fir= - lu ,,' City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ease No: ZA 97-083 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for CS Zoning Request for the City of Southlake Elevated Water Storage Tank& Denton County Radio Transmission Tower Service Building being 4.50 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: City of Southlake Cheatham & Associates 667 N. Carroll Avenue 1601 E. Lamar Boulevard, Suite 200 Southlake, Texas 76092 Arlington, Texas 76011 Phone: (817) 481-5581 Phone:(817) 548-0696 Fax: (817) 488-6796 Fax: (817) 265-8532 Attn: Gordon Johns CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. The applicant has requested a variance for the following requirements: a. Although the required bufferyards are shown, the applicant requests a waiver of the required bufferyards due to extensive tree cover. (P & ZAction 7/17/97: allow requested variance) b. Applicant requests a waiver of the required landscape area and plantings due to extensive tree cover. (P & ZAction 7/17/97: allow requested variance) c. All towers shall be of monopole construction, unless another type can be shown to cause less visual impact on surrounding property. The proposed tower is a lattice-type. (P & ZAction 7/17/97: allow at discretion of engineer) d. Freestanding towers (for two users) shall be limited to one-hundred-twenty feet (120') in height. The proposed towers is 401' in height. e. Towers constructed adjacent to properties used for residential purposes shall maintain a 2:1 distance to height ratio. Due to the approximate 401-foot height of the tower, the minimum setback shall be 802' from all property lines sharing a common boundary with residentially used property. f. The tower compound should be enclosed with either an 8' solid screening fence, 8' masonry wall, or a combination wrought iron fence with an eight (8') foot evergreen hedge. Applicant proposes 8' chain link with 2' barbed wire screened by existing vegetation. (P & Z Action 7/17/97: allow requested variance) • -71-- - I � City of Southlake,Texas 0. Provide the following additional information for the telecommunications tower/antenna request: a. Elevation drawings (signed and sealed by appropriate licensed professional) of the proposed tower, including the locations of all exterior wires and/or cables necessary for operation of the antennas and the equipment building proposed on the site. Label the type of finish on the tower and building as well as the height of both structures. Confirm that no guy wires will be utilized in the installation of the tower. b. The propagation map provided does not appear to show the complete coverage area. Please clarify the extent. The propagation map should also be signed and sealed by appropriate licensed professional. c. Certificates of insurance in compliance with § 45.8 IV K 2 of the zoning ordinance. 3. All towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure should fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunication towers. 4. Provide the FCC/FAA approvals as well as certification of compliance with ANSI and IEEE Standards. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which may require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 8/11/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Cheatham & Assoc. John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services, City of Southlake L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97083CP2.WPD S _1I-- I) ID 0 - 0 - SAW([ $cr NOTE-LONIOU INICRVALO,o FCC/ I 1, p iL YJ yU( yl CATEGORY OF USEST-A� i 1 ELEVATED RATER STORAGE RADIO TOO SM155/ON TOWER [— '—'•' N. SERVICE BLINDING Ip ',�/� MAR. DA GIL BCR IIII • �_•1 ( + GILBERT PROPOSED 10 FT. WIDE ) KtUYE lRJ7,PwE{fjs p WWII(!ARY 7!7 PAGE 3/3 SITE INFORMATION SATE ,.,.ii� TYPE B" BUFFER YARD\ RACI 6,ABSI.No.9 7 E RAC/9,ABSI.Na 977 .k NORTH - WEST - SOUTH\ I leap•.-°r x.vlr a3.aa/Ml RY lIM..ravel prNvrr avlxwlYl EXISTING ZONING=AGRICULTURAL a•i" Iwwc Y AawcIRIVKµ y PROPOSED ZONING=CS-COMMUNITY SERVICE IOW.•ACRKUIudAI LUO s EDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL / I GROSS ACERAGE a 4.5 ACRES I i EAST I 1 1397.00' / NET IMAGE' 3.94 ACRES y 1 e ` .'1 TOTAL FLOOR AREA a 3f9 50.FT. /\a Sly bi.63/!//;/'�///.s ....�� 3 ONE Lor 1 6 fLIJRJS TWG-� G r r tN' ,! _ �- i -. 'k) RE "VCR ELEVATED S1. AGE TANK - 1 �/�'�)/ / ( 8l NE HT - I6Sff{FEET - Bl ELEV. I 0 O I V I ALTHOUGH INC REOUIRCD BUfffRYAp05 ARC SHOWN, _ -- - ,✓. _I� U ' O RFLOW ELEM- 601 ; 0 O RE BUFF(RYAROS ODUE TO FXIENSIVE TREE SCORER IRED • / I ELEV.= {SO NARY 1£OA PAGER/ VOLUME LEDA PAGE 3/3 G b .... TRACT 19,AGSr.Na 977 2Y / s. I AX WO•,R0 1 O[NMR aux. APPLICANT RID PLANTINGS A wUV[R OF INC REWIRED LANDSCAPE AREA O; / u 1 I `1 E O law,w•Aca¢u/wr AND PLANTINGS DUE r0 CXTFNSIVE TREE CORER / = 6& `. ^ arY OF$OURRAKf I N •' • A d-' F<�E - �, I B00%95}66056 f TT MAP N / ^ ' y1C! _`, TRACT 71,A8 T.Na 992 I lG /� i E I/�I I waar O[�u/a01.4.4 10070,M< I / n Y �� -� 1 �O I µr /I �. (� am 'ROPOSED cRII� I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 7 ?i 1 , \ \; 2-1 GATES I O 4,, K Q iG i n"I`'M PRO SEO 44 •�` S Beginning al 1.southwest corner el m Hm<I.l land 4Y dead to Jane lones and suss Ell. e''''' ♦ _ O I Jono as ealdanced 61 deed of Intel of n<ord In Volam•13J. oe. IL.<Trust Records. I 2-16 GATES I , xry : O II O Denton County,ream,,eald polol also being Ine southwest corns,of•tract of Tana Cr g.1 1 T O GRAPHIC SCALE I dead to Ins pry or SoalniaN.a.recorded In Beet 9]-6so]e,0e.d R.cora,,Canton RO55 CT. ((77 [Gunk,Teaao; ) _J CI 2 i(Il ‘1673fff In //II G .` OggJJ T ;yam THENCE East,a distance of 39700feet lea palm Iwo In TW) I �l a • T WAL(((RRRg(((JJJJ,,, o/ THENCE S 0e Do'00'W.o distance of 100.00 feel.to o Pdn.far a darner: 1 Q a x ;I t•`�. CI. CRET�BUILDING' Q4 , CO `B 1\��, (rI�U / I THENCE S 23 OW 00'W,a distance al 300.00 feet,le o point ler o corner; I LJ Or. 6 ` M', I I / ) THENCE S 13 00'00'W,a dl•tonc.of A3.40 lest,le a point ler corncmrn gdo I 1 / : )0' I I ; / J O ( THENCE S in !6'Ae'W,o distance of 36/.10 Teet to a pain.for a .r In T.W. 1 I king Reod; '/ E� 'ROPOSED did 1 0 THENCE west,o distant.of 167.20 fo.l,to the POINT OF BEGINNING.end c 111I RANSNIS.••1 TO E't I I containing d.3 acne of land. or b... 11 J( l-� TOP ELEVATIO ii 1 d9 ._ GROUND ELEVA •Nf +V 648 ♦ hN Q O 181 aI I cURyOrOR-RR IYIQg 2B (�Ifl� 181 J 9 II I CITY OP SCOTNULL C11LAT0EA1f k As5OLTATL9 bN FI VU I ' I I e07 N.CALROEX AVENUE 1601 L.TAMAR BLVD.SUIT[200 IUD I VlI /I / 113'00`O.A"W I aOUSHLG L,TEXAS oeo92 ARLINGTON.Tws 9wu ,y / E I S 1 I 43.40' 1 (017)4e1-SOIL (117)ae-aw I11 / 1IErIGONi4Cf:fABDON LOMN6 N.,,, I AWE JONES J..BUELNT JONES AND EULA OARS 0 8 .T y 1 8 TRACT 14 4.P E 972 \ 0 EaLMf ud.PACE 76 Z 0 ' 1 V 1 I I `00 la...II 00a0190901M•Rea \ APPROVED BY TN!PLANNING k ZONING 6\\1 � / E I r DOMYL4IION 1. \ PROPOSED \ \ i •- �� I ` ern 1n� 2-14' GATE,� `ta / \b c�g..w, SHADY O.KS CC U ` �� I 2 O w �`e1ft �] 1 ----} lia © `' a' LYINf.XRINSOV APPROVED BY TOE CITY COUNCIL Y a w I .I I 1VlUNE J7.;PAGE 193DAM ¢¢a Y' l (((RRRAC/M,ABSI.N>922 C(� 4 t : ` / 3 I. .10/11 G•A•GRKKM1 1 Nlul d I WTOI L Lirs(XIS?W j I 1 p ''VT PR AC6TSAr: �CI ' i t/TREE COVER ; vq O 1; I o CONCEPT PLAN FOR CS ZONING REQUEST a P.0A13. . I lwu' frT CITY 0/wvTNIA1a w� A.+ I / R.O.ORGY 3URK. ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK .(/ I , 7d :JW ! ARSRACI Ne LIJ /6 ST 187.20` E „t�< 1 DENTON COUNTY wlf�MCaw 9MKY cr N.u/I q N� 1n RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER Nw l K33/_l7—Cj$C% SERVICE BUILDING ABJRACrNOW`;:. :i 2 / :'s 11 \ _�� �UL 2119y/ l.MCI. Td, .:oL:TZAR.l / / *WAIT E.LAMCREAUX,J..and PARBAR C LAMCREAUX LIWNG TRUST BONA 4.50.CSAi 6RVIT6o IL TIM ll PYF[MOM AkmLLT No.MI.6OLNM MORT.TRAP ,.LAMES D.CRANFILI ANO WEE I ROOF 96-0016718 OE D RECORDS RECu J U L 2AS YCCLOAL a LOOS M-.Im.• BEI£RLY ERANfILL / TRACT I.ABSI.N 1566 11997 DM MOLDS.DOOTOM COUNTY,TIZA6 VOLUME 3077.PAGE 632 WO.M100I0 p(NMR I10UIl I 1 TOT RACI 7,AB51.Na 1366 WOW.•AGAKUI Al NgOOC D$Cr. 7 TIN IawacO1 INNS.' N.'11 JWIN1Ma 1 I l JUNE.19gT w6 M0.1......13..a Ob/3U/91 15: 13 "Slf 25f3 JbJb (late 3L...' 1LL2 �t��� • Denton County Sheriff' s Office $ .`h",Eye'` 7 �. i.V Q 410 . '. it'd yew i 4 s • 2x 9 �r • pQ "'a sic , z '� `:' 3 sy�`v:..:-, y i. 14 ■ �. r. ?CN.r s7 3k,. t,•. .Pw d `1 w ' u ¢ atje. flw ft " = • - t `z �- us " !� r ta 1 'am" ' sueY y__ @ :..yb ak J .' � F � .a+ ' d� • Xt� b f � , l " ^ =. at3.:. .4,,, y,) „ a, y .a e rr, ' '�' � " -x" ,, ` rfx. ': , T n,'.;t 0., R: , e: A F . .:. "qa~q y " � • a xi '.:• *t f .. auc�". w« h,� 0. x fir', w , id yyrg,, 4� a d y iF y"-'a�[ j 7 4 6• ,. 't-.ott �t -st a. +lie --= Y'yv '"■ S 1 rp4A °:.. ti _ fi li7 =ra^tr. 4411pl . � s� g s x4'- a k 4 s " �a �rr , ,� ' ,�'aN7 z7~ 4 4" z t '� � 3m s +� • > k� �, a m��t^ � �" r �e n4, �st ` T ' :l�. "40114 • , v. ' x aS " ,r± _ ' x' - g ..e' v • Fes 3 � -* -,y :: tv • ' • rx d 1 -.4g*-s "'7� ,,„�„ x , ,,- e • ' . -, :' r ti` _ . ; *W r a ` ' aP z , F ya: 7 F.F - fi .. w ems L. r-r r .•4a7, s? r t# � `. ,s . ¢p' • , * ''''`'....',','-'''''sr - : `+ r a � 3� it 7 " x5fi "' o r ., ;'* - a. . ...Y4 a• , a � "` • ' ti s °' Zµa, T rcx x' a i -it't ` '6' ,7 Nx 73, xar. • �Y'y"' ^^ ,„ ,'S,ate: 'w.Yd',4(+'- = Zw 3.;': 1■ i •a .. E ' fi !3 a e..'iw1 • 'y,`9a` ..,4Mte' 1 :�.:,yam -- r s ' '`.T r'`..x. �.A+�.. L L. .�*�,,,� ^ ,� �, ear "x ',� _ �, ; + �1 '- _-. �'. � 3 vtr., r Y Flit .1t Fxa' i �"< yr s_.Ys S ! ,1.'$a. ' �' it • ' Fd' 11; 'Li? ,U, �. - Sc • e '?a s Ark i • at} ' aI I 40 93 10G i0 so 70 B0 Sisa.oast Hasa To Secure 4 Level Portable Laa.�aia Calculated values are derived ��R� � �N�. Field Unit la Building using average loss values for qc u surroundings. Some low lying t , I. r , , : a I i ; , , f I heavily wooded or urban areas SCALE : 5.00 MI LES PER INCH ,.ay result in lower values than those indicated. # + I261242387 Field unit ERS t l.1939(-1OS.S i) I, tt� �� �ro er s C27926 field Unit Ant fit 3.0 Et. ` 0 3 Kt: j a e : 04/25/199bwield Unit Ant Type s `( C/ illoine + *VrtSe4; — 4Q, + lO/ - WI\ 4/m9 1snoy = , t , Y H1..' -\ ''' lr {r f„i I;y f7},t f r .v t • r, .d ;,4"+C.:j ..;�. ¢, J :ri}f y.q>r 1 i. �.,y10 ,Aa 1^, h+1• ,. ± h, r?ti 4 t .. • A�.^ � x .•h; , 1 fir. ,';; .r.' ' ,' .. wrt,' r r' .u.YY't��;tt' 4 ••�= l.' ,%, :,:'y-,` GI •''•�r r r' { ,, 5.. i.+,�,.xt ,"` • •„fj��t/'s�'' ��1vy r� ,r i �zi , ':+ t 1 il��� : � rr• �� #j�•1)r�r • ,i- :'t }�"iSW�. •✓'�"•sn�• ,l: Lr t.• ' ,. t. .t !N . '{ ')•rt-••p,I• 1•t. N • :S'R }}... '•� ' ' r, , ^^Y:. . M).�`:�r't /,-,.^t, r 1'fr, .�.�s�#,f �1.' t+l'�1 .•tip ',r. :f lt, +ML j;• it ��Sa i ^'tf ' �" �,'.RF ,'. '�' ti;,Y, . .� , . :t, -ik., �6,y.t,1,,:� 5, t. } .•h1.ul, r.1. ifi•..i.• 'i,,t r�rr 1,IC +I..r++ a . ,•or9 •T''' •,. ), ;+ s�`. . *• .�i"+�° 4- r kjv, ri ,..4,,d Y.r', a, u [ • ,$0,,,r,:, ,,� ,fi+,,�'• ,r ?a Te�1I.I° `�:a': o: , ( ._ 4�,k� { a •+. r "� r �` h' '�w.. •,,.,,.., ,,,F.,1,.:� :i;fvas,`•s*�t•r;S31 t�. ,I � �!� i ft3r rn 47.,tt, 'ItJ , „• , ..S,• ,T!' �>r", 4 .e , l �r .t • D•!r.N '" t 't}:{`..^ ,,,,.<. �,:�:�r<• ' + r�: •` .n •+ •,K ,*�':� ,. :r .� +.h �'. ' �N ,fr .:�<d ;.9.d +;,.; }t :ki'''1,,.Y4.....,ro •r,y',?tr,,:r+ i';«I'Y9.1",.,>, .r G 7^'spp./ is "r+r. ;;i,, r l t '`tr, k�t ~ .,L + k, +iv; ,(. 04• J at`` •+„Y.. • •. •..,� t,9.4.1.e.t �,.ti t,.kg- • ,, r;/fi'+ 11. .,'�Vf5.7• l 7^ rr , 4ir'?; 7Y x, a+' w... , r 7,. "J ° ,? Y ;`4, �F i..d^•� •>: ,r,t,.. yr p�. .A" �, ?'! .t'f,'#, r �,i�iii,. r✓: {4.�:IY '�, •Y,.G.;�y�,�n r!s� t' r r .r�� -'�'�.: ,.:. si",1 t };r � . +47:;.r:l .,7 }'' M1 '. .da••:•,4>i •r• .py •.4�5.. ,,Ix2bM•,. •u• .g ..hA!1 G•�1, fpfiw, kt,1;v S3 jii ' :(: :>.1. ,. .P _ �., ,:y_ ^'vr, ,..i •:R..r•. `� .^ t„ A:., •.N.vSh /!,��e ..'tr•Yr .F•. r!!. .k~.Mq;d ,r, , t„ t , v p.':j..r..Y .J •1 Y+ . .."4r ,!,4.1 � r 5 .,., + +ti+� ,.Cy�p i 5, V .+>'7,�:}, t.r '•,. 'x;SkS•i '.' ri:<4:•rt.-„,C`M'j.. yy .:,,,,.. ?..d' F x •+„ -a. : x � "' a �. . r �I�'X r �>, �; k.t+� - - .f.. , ,.�'�., � � , � tA,1 �'.! K il.�. P.. 4ti#'L�.lp' � 1 •��R. '!,": 'i'^r:p•adi +fA'�'1�}�t �l ll;^ ��?>Y. t :1 1 >�q ��.,. 'Y s • •; f 3.. •a ll� ^Y,� :y.,•.' �. rt,„ .,,,.WI,Y,.,,;nYA' T._•_1 t�,• A" +• �Afiyt��li1{A'Sa f�y sri•y\,}'� ilQ �� {�,� t, kvl nYtt t'irw r ,1.,�'�:-l`,..• e ';.. 6. '4T4 A4•.`��.f�-t }N�,+Ft;., i `J� , .x• 1.�4 d >. a. •r.'4+l .,...'2.), d�+:!,. .y:<, r:,,}0.: ..1' a ,S r �t}.. • -r ;;Y ,. v „l. .: .Y H 1 ,."i'Y l,yYi,,yd � '}NS. .�.,�t. .2 �s s �1 ;-@, � �,1,�. Si�l, .�,f+�'�'1Y'�t ' +N�. aM�,,'��1� - "•i{ �tft�:' .fbw�r i•RC,i� 1�:�'}•i 1.,1.•,Lt.�,: rn,�fi�5', ,�f, Irt. t•:�: Y � '.;ti<...� y' frll;,• ^.."�,� r ,,I, � :�.5•a,'�� 'itt'{�i�r 1 }7St.1>i�t'�K{'ii''�" �1;,:�.�;'=f Per -�° ��yy�•ra'rU.ia2f: .at�'ba #���� .��}� Y ' � :�..". �"��� i 3�'��� ,p7 •aw y';a:+,.E. t,a, +.gyp ��,N�!'� ,'+4'0� r }�` th .Y+, -..a. i�� +•'S .4 � - . TE ."ii . ,�� �`,tT - �y,�'.'x�Y ,� d•�, �1`t't�:Y. {t�'R,�'.� -,+i 1�� 7,�4 ,:�. ;A�'��, 1 ti, •�.,.1 7t s. }.* •'y..a;• .; SA r.,i 1a • ,: .,� •,t 'c' 1 I•t :44 r♦r .+•'^ .{ ..'` „,IM 1, '}'. h.1,-+;'=�':9.,-{• Y. �A° ,�M.p.)vl, , :Y..y]�•.�' is} :k�.•'�<.. .J4� ..� r".� ,y.��•$ i.J•0 •i�°r;1 't-r�.A�''}•;'p f%Cy ' ,, {„ .a F ..{:'l + { �IQ.J.4.,' • rc.. ':;4P',14 -' , { rA! '•IJ: .1=0 1: •1"JS''''5"J.N {, . :vrt„ . 11:'} C xF';,� f ',� .r.+.�i� �:.; fi ? ` ,, kt:� r� r r >;,<�� �t a� 'b'�d[; , .19�o1L l • •�.,,� r.4 Y•.•F'G� �.'� Y i` a • a'Nr' ,f hL y�„'�d� f ^te,'K.Z�.h, • K•;, �1 Y' ,.. r ";'r h l 1'f Sri - 5 , ;� r'i rl . t },.,. {•.t ,`, ^ r(.' py, .' S. r ti,, 4 .a � �� ,ii 4 +la. } o ..}�• +� .,`�,t.• 1 , � f�;, },u., a na,. • v1Mf'r •>;i�J� .L. ,�'sa•� b< i''Yt; ▪ 4y��', t, •,,'T 4 ' ' 'si Lttii:eiM �i �r +'c'? ;0.0"1,'k R '";:r....`1 girt' •�•$�iS �r i`X ; , '.tr, 1 rrkf:.i• k• -r`- �P;'! i.4,4'41.!•. ' �,Y'a .L 1�+'1,4i�•.a ,, t # ., '• ,,!- .r,JtCs.. .`"_.I;;�,: ,.rt+l'�L1. �{ •lnl^T s+ St',r iY, ^ .1r:�:.� i�til t�1h'a.lt_r. di Yk°u:ar"�'tt+yy '!;J{tn'� 'ti.+A�. :Y 7;;:ra + i �.;. f - K1 7 •! r .'"t - .hy� { 1I4 J�a.w Ix ,,,•7,1 •-, to ,�•, , lh• , .i„ •,,,.,) ..,�iJYT:; ,. -};ah,. h�+t-�.1�F,..r• '.o �, .+SrW7, ./� �., r• + '? yy �f_ � 1'� }-;n.•,,•,. •, /r.'.� TY.t :•}',,�.. *i.,; �{I 4!1 ���yri',• �+Ca, r� , I" .•z}4r t�ti '{ .�.+1�+P t�4.' N 3 >,>�'j',1(15�`N ^,tpl�; M� t 4S,f' d a„ •1. �., '� r+ ^ f.1 },5r ft• • �.i • 'e V Lys , .„,,,-, r r� r3,P tt i• .... ,, , ��• <�, � •� , .«.a r)� �? ;• 5• � _r.. ,��,.�• � , � �pp���''�I�r,. 1 , er �r, t�v(nr�:�<1 ,5, �:: �Dr ,,fin•c,t4;t r�' 'I,z. , c•.M1 4,04- K i x• 5 • ,fir.. 1 .� 4 y r.,, .,' . r 3' / r X •1 Tr q, M '�. {I'i •4�;Y1 7:,GC` ''i e ff•—• •i,+s`'Y4 a ' tr +^' d• E �� ,••• ;!•r '-.h•-s Y"2t1, 91'1 w , t ,;...N.. t '�''•e x C :: ,, • o 1Q,,,�� �.°;���' �•, ��'. • �� 1, s Si.:.;�• ,� vst,t�:.. , v�1.1 '".n.;'':�tq f. ,�.,e^'r�t '�>_r ;''r,t•' �, ,q ^i 1. :,'"Ii'r1• I!• iiiir +, t..,'„' i•• :.yi r 'iyy i'i4l,, �i , 4'ord1 N . 41 4 t'a19,,I,c1 `41!9.f,?gik,,, »7,",,,,�t;"iv,6, r,j� h�e;r.`.,., ;r,ie •''� ��,�Y�� --,... v t ) Zr wh r. j., �{'j.?�(x,. ,.v.. rt ^,�.1 j r LS,•Fh IV t^d l ��'.'t r + r t.f. .Iti- ! • ,i.§4. Sd,;Ji`..fhr' '. , +f+ Y)•'' '3R. y, •, l ktf,'-' !�'. ap$ilt40.,ty N4' o'U'.r/,j. !9 iU v,:i".;� a:. y, r ... • :`P -,, ' .;:1rir SfYk'tlii'''rn5•i,7, ^ sd+ty(+' • .v ,p '7�'�¢ 'll; t'�7k'A �•1Yx,1rr�.Y>•,.rr :' '17iFl�:.y�' p f.�,r' Y.r!y►('�Fr,'4jr�i , ,ti(;4' ` • n tiritr 'l. _"�Ar. (� l� `) • ti t' r of "F!•SrJ v,' l: •-V .+ i>Y,t/:: yI ,.�6'�" t'w-•�+��i,' ti." :��S 4 �� ~ .� r •? T; Y�•!alfl f a'tk:'I�,�' a.�,+i?'�-�°N.�^r�,1pS+L.+ryS,�,h ,r{1•�.• } �•��!"!N T�,7 ,r,•'I'�! .} r ,tr 1 • .*, •„,...'�i. /� '.4.,yy, +,,:,ni .•�:.Pd '. '6 _•(; .• :'! ro44. ,. ..• i .)'-'-•4/t{. iyi;, !,1,y14•;�.•Vo?'rPY:� °�lir•• 1- Y'r °�-'• ',V,TI�'"r.-tiir>n'.Q,ty., Fv 3f:r,' .>`I' ,�„ _ • '\ A? 't •4� i'', � r 7. 1 ,.t fe1 Y ,y,7d t'+K �' , .,l .,i - �T;dtik 1tiC^`,MSy;, .,A 3'f'. '�j' 1• , •'�,,.11-.w,� � 1Y 5k•(tS'a„ h+ .514k +' K t. ,,f jy�s >1,.. , 1 v,.• r,iy ;,,,�,, ^ ., t tv,,, A: .'+s. ,, t -,, 'wv r r b k a r Ule "tn , r.,00,t ,1'.•4'' N � u ?kN+ S�•#�k`�up)1�.ryx A? - t'r' •tC`t, ,..'r ,1�P x7N3Y� 410'k+•fi �rfi. 'N ��dj^���dJriYy� �..N.ii�5r6ke,:.ro; • {I'('' •:.4.-•+1, .. ! • �'� r 7'Cn• r r + t p:t - �y . , 4 ,`.(rV _A�,tt<. ;, •.-'b'.• i47w•j• d4•177`.,i , yp• �,,. ,J •c {Y}�,:,(t,_i` I Jt.4,1 W .8.4re i17 .�5,`"1�rJ'ib:�^•'•W>^`f: k'1': 44'it s, '� ,. : - :u� '.•'Z.M, 3�,"+ • A�•�''v::YS .. A !1-t . .•.� 7it).- it. .t, .••••."4.ir i 117',FP'' r -4,'t'•,-.-1 @{kA ,..-.4 �>E1� �-_ ,,,, � . . yA, .> +:• r3 * + r�}• 4., �3t ,, r.f is ,1W +� �t .,46 . F ,tw 4. n t ,r,4 i 5. Ml+ a .:`P'.� � f.^,fir• 'Y,e:i,iie:'� 'K+4i+x • i+A ti. 'y?{'F. .�i`^ y V CK!',�",-•s1. .:Yb{�•• i y ,• ' `w t�',h` u�'~�q-r {� .'. ( a.,. r .. - y , 1"% i; 7 .:ir. •t 1 ,,�F..rt',•i�g.:0„-,.oiSS' -It: tiyk,.;r) (r p r II0 kt( , ..�.r M t it'd, r r;: i.l•. •• „� f' S- P. ,t , A SV ,•'�'�,'7urt.rY•n x.'1.r^.;f /:i,i,,.X .•5 r !�- •7 a- f Ir- i{;v. q „ �Z:`'I y+' t H ;+. '1 ?ky�. �r r} „ • 1�Lrvye �(p t y,� {y +• "• h pf�! �,rr�w 4, .11.ti��,r1���+�a' L�.'�••��}7�/�^, ¢�� x��,•t 4.. .y..° #, ,�t fI r' N�.'" ; "•44•• •1 1 1: ..J, t•:. i ,tt;{ r1 ,-`. ,' ,,-; ',, ,.4, ,. ..„a y.,...or ,�. AZ" i', � ,+ 't,^.•My t, ` T.,..," ..tP...� ,ya. • =y ,r °'Mf 't j ,,.Ye. > i r �. TTT,Y�' iid' vi .•tK, ;F • f' F+`t {r*•fV,Y'�i h• - x! i, - --. ^ p a X;x i• t. to • i 1 •b• } , i M;s:.d,'a�� ...{.� '{ •l k`0 - .t 4 • , r ` a.-w..r v+..,-..—..Y • 4 t ytp(• - tifi ' b � , vfir r sm.. �+ r. t v. }f I v+ ,fir _ t9, IY • l + • +• P • V. r • • •am;lee fig' Vi —,#-.. r. • 111111, .�• .;,' • 1 !F IC. t .. , 1rg3 , i. g1 •:•x ' .v.f.4,5 Ss• .o+. r.> •w .I�r': ,� , •r� ptt. f ➢,'i'1°1 '!^ P�'7.1 ,i►�Y I /�,a• K• I,,t •^� n° i Al •t , I• w yi R'•"Q i' . M+ r* W �", '1'n • rre ,. I shSd 1`!';"•1#✓ i a si �,r '..1 C, !'� :° �' . tR • 4., .iy, , y'+ vd ♦ �,yF M['•}y�r �. • :, / •. 40 K • . • •g.5. r l• . r+m ,'i' t 4,,,,...Y t 7l'y�. , a.� .tr! ,i -`^<�• �lM !�• i •. :• • .,Ir..•, • •t,r r i! � i1t4 �r+f'*�1 ;' , ^ ,..try; • .••' �:,Y i ...'£. ''ii. ! •r.�'r�(' • Y 4' ,.r ♦ �' '� .•..v, I ynlGa , sr'} R •1.t1„C7 r .;t, • �� w rw. ati .ya, ..aw ;�n,>; , y�r..yKw ''r �' .. } i , ke I r ri' '�„R... .. .� yi� .+1t., yr .,i . .tyr 04 ,,e1,t� ! 'MK '"r*` ." 4. t j,,.t'^•4t s•/,.i i/�°f , .• ,� _ t tti R 'S; -4 '`• iili• .` 'ice..• .t.4Y1 ' ���'., ,y, /1r �7 ���}' +� L,,,„1 44 �f .„ ^�'_ *, 14 .,, r•, y., fit/yr r•}, t r '• r "• 1,�,1�,, �' + J > •t';• ' .P" !. '{,`},+lrr3'+r 3• i - q '•• ._ . , r -pS� , r.•! da, { ,:1 i.'�(' Y •I•}y�� a nrt'vrf.. L. t N. •,• j!r r;'•1e•.+' {;.�• ,"�1 • t yOki r P > r,�,d' ;or i••i.Pa . '•••.''e,+F•: , . . •x `. ,,•+ • �Y -, `'-7 ".1.. }�,% n•• 1 y4 _0. ' 1 r '.cJ1 -f,A.' x°� '1'�f`: a•3: a. •.0," ' ;1'..•,,,.;. ' - +� .. •••a j '.ff 1e,�, -7 + �{�5?t�t„ {:,' .•+..i.{t �' S !' }fir•` ' r , 'n- r .o f,li r- r1,.,,J ,R y, I ;.,•4, ,} •y,r • ��.1, ry , {{fro'jr t.,t ,.T wl I3 'jri Q,+�St,I :!'r r,, ^• `•,csC• 4 ry,�{ Fr� •0 ,t �.L��4 Y `` i .) ::[ • P. Y ,K��! T law i•Y• �;.. •t+.i - rk.t' "'' ✓ ,t" 't Y` �.+n •:v �.f, .t, .}�• .:*,„ ,`t.' 1 ,G •;, j,� ,v� x •, y;�70( .. �r ^;y.1 ' `�1:ytS r.• yea,./tts,. Cf' {,t h•} , .: i,a!ri v' 1. ` ,A �r'4 •`(1'!�.0,4" t�t r: 1 'f •q ` ,. �_ J'' - , ♦ it `. k yryr?', ,,. t , ^ xd` A 'A. a,',Ir• •Y(1.p�1trt•Yvp"f' �' "s , rrt r�va?Z, r't�r:^ i�l. "h rx: j` y "' '�£j + _.y:� ih ✓ w• !f.• n jf,f�'1'y r,;r , "j •Iti.�'a • p�.'jy -.,/ •••` ,FI'i I yt° ' •J' ',''.r •!Mn,. ~ fh •,,,. ..Jr...F•.• ,,,x ^ ; • ~ } ..w!' M •+ .,..�.k. ei� + E•.o11.;t>r.y . it;i ..aw. T.. ?'.t+.: v rr•:i�1�'l'u1a�r' � .• ter:?ICI r "'! 1 .: tdiL,�fw._.. rS.II:�.•.• ,:�..t• '.rll�i ., f N • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-249 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES, SITUATED IN THE R.D.PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 992D, BEING TRACT 21, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by • the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-249.W PD Page 1 � 1_ II • S producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, SWHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed • and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 4.5 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 992D, being Tract 21, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-249.W PD Page 2 • hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable S consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to S such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-249.WPD Page 3 7 p -1 • 1111 Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 , of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES 1480-249.W PD Page 4 _1ir _ iC1 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-249.WPD Page 5 Th — 1 (`, • • EXHIBIT "A" I 1 1 Beginning at the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to June Jones at nd wife, Ella Jones as evidenced by deed of trust of record in Volume 133, Page 128, e thwest corner of a deed toCthe tCity of South lake point Denton ouny, Texas, said f land eas also ginhBooku tract 95 66058, De d Records, Denton by Denton ; County, Texas; t THENCE North, a distance of 676.11 feet to a point for a corner; j THENCE East, a distance of 397.00 feet to a point for a corner in T.W. King Road; THENCE S 08 00' 00" W, a distance of 100.00 feet, to a point for a corner; THENCE S 23 00' 00" W, a distance of 300.00 feet, to a point for a corner; I THENCE S 13 00' 00" W, a distance of 43.40 feet, to a point for corner; THENCE S 14 56' 48" W, a distance of 267.70 feet, to a point for a corner in T.W. King Road; S THENCE West, a distance of 187.20 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 4.5 acres of land, more or less . • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-249.WPD Page 6 • • • • • I SM/EL 5 CI •vOIE-CON TOUR INTERVA(=10 FEE! j X (1 ��'^� }UC ( G CATEGORY OF USES Ir ` � W r 1 ELEVATED WATER STORAGE $• Y RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER f SERVICE BUILDING ; =�! CO n PROPOSED 10 FT. WIDE l VOLUME lRJ MARY D7.PAGE 595 i uARr tEDA LKBEAI SITE ��'- 4 -, TYPE B' BUFFER YARD\ I TRACT 4 ASS Na 97 .i VOLUME JZJ7.PAGE 513 SITE INFORMATION J TG !II' QQ •N ,YKI► NORTH - WEST - SOUTHI L .IIVS ,x"YIIL eE µRILNn �� IDo;�T,�uY xevry ens Darn EXISTING ZONING=AORICUU!URAL ` - 11 1 -�..VX�s�'!"'"a 2•` J> B.O.••AWICUL vRn PROPOSED ZONING=CS-COMMUNITY SERVICE i 6�.1a■ O \ " �:tStl.S_!4!!�% �"•/...I 397.00r /' TOTAL ACEMADE AREA RESSFSITY UL I r / . . Y• ` tr EAST r f I1 .�,r [1 ONE O /\_ FUMr'R-coKR�' — WIT �++Y1 u `.\ �'S l -1.�y' 77 ';f TRq cOKR-, eR SEDD ligRiA poi EA 1 C7 / / 81 ELEVATED STORAGE TANK O O 1 /HE:GHT = 165I FEET = B1S TEEN. 1 p O 1 I ALTHOUGH THE REQUIRED BUFF('QUADS ARE SHOWN, �� /�:';' ' n / A' o' OVERFLOW ELEV- BDI f p THE APPLICANI REQUESTS A WAIVER OF THE REQUIRE° - --_ p (NITER YARDS DUE f0 EXTENSIVE TREE COVER "[-w'AS i' D u M ELEV,= 650 I s p VARY KOA OLBERT _ ,Fla L, / 'a 1 . 9 I n 1 O LOL UYC JZJZ,PAT{515 +..7N1 _/__ I L I [.b '- TRACI 19.ABST Na 977 ++ 1 `1 0 WO•YEpvY otwr.at31M"1 APPLICANT REQUESTS A WAIVER OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA 1yII _ / , Z 1 0 \\ I CITY tX SOU MLANE Ea"vF ea•ICufUu( I AND PLANTINGS DUE ID EY/ENSIVE TREE COVER ' ee\\ A I�(4T� -�, / BOLW 95}66058 11 �. i_•�/1 .- _►A __ VICINITY MAP O / 7 J N� \ TRACI 21,ABST Na 992 N N LO �o ` �� P wwNc•.uKu !LE,' N�•ROPOSED , W �i� A' S% CL 1 \ \\\ 2-14' GATES " Err ♦ �I� PROPERTY OCSCRlP110N '—'-- --'...\ 7 C I ci O• ' ,. :nil c ''ET) g i I' Ay ,fry PROPOSED A S I B•9lnninq ole nn.•eau..Y<a.n, or o Ts of mna ui:..a m mn•mn.,ana.u:al. .ula f- 1 2-16 GATES 3' O ion•,o. .c.a 61 a,.a ar r,,a ar. o.a In a m 1]],Poq,Ilea w,l R.<a.a.. 1 I h .` O Denton c'r.C/T•oo,.,air point rmao p•mq m•,o�1 -66<a.,r m <I m lens 61 S• 2' 1 �(,�'( / O GRAPHIC SCALE rear le tn,City of Soalnia Y•a,record.in Boat 91-66058,n0••a Records.Damon MOSS Cl/ !� illi =5c :/ lit I ) E•�' • O I County.Was, //=11 V. .1 I( • , P 1/•POSED, �ry 1 f I 1•��N1 I THENCE Honn,o anlan<.at 676.11 1,•1 la a point lo.o<oDn.•• TJ / / ^Z 1 0 •-` STORY I ,�j Yr THENCE Eaa a distance of 391.00 1,41 1 a point loy a a.T.W.i.w.Klnq Road: I ��./l 7- 1 LLJJ d o p Q Hu G.'CRETt]I BUILDING') Q4i` THENCE 5 06 00'DD'w,a al,lona•of 100.00 1•.I,to Dior lo.a corn.,: k yd� 1 •$ I / e r I THENCE $13 00'DO'W,p distance of 300.00 1•,1,to D point fora corn,,; 1 I ' �`� \ I 1 I i THENCE 5 13 00'00-W,a al,tanc•of 43.40 teal,10 a point for corner; CO HI �//17 dN I� 10 I I ; / RI `O I THENCE 5K14 36 45'w,•alalonc•of 161.10 14I,to o point Ior a corn.,In T.W. l J Ir TRROPOSED • DIp 1 • O I I THENCE ..I. • <•c`aezm loot.II the POINT of BEGINNING,and W 0 (!'U TOP ELEVATIO1551• !ID Eri f . o m or ass J 1 ♦9 X • • containing aa.i a of la II--.T�••11 _ a O GROUND ELEVA .4t 648 f �nF I y- ' %O IC i i =I i I i II I OrNEB .2115 DR-f.YrINIf. ti 1 f I 35 UII /I i 1 • 3'00 0q'W ma r PCARROLL AVENUE 6 2 WW1 BLVD.u�SUITE 200 '-J \ E'' / 1 I p 43.40'� (SNIL)*51-5952us 16092 I(II?) i5-4406 160 11 ....1 N SV n ( 11 / 5 , fI I.NNE XWES-R..BUCLAN XWES AND EU(A DAVIS CONTACT)CORDON JOHNS �.. I I, I 1 I a 1 8 TRACT 14 ABST.Na 922 \ Z!X 0 ''10'1.1 1 I 1 I VOLU• ME.00 PAGE IOL P C I I aw IO".WR=ACMCIILIWn _._ o• C 1`Y 1 APPROVED BY THE PLANNING A ZONING 1\\ \ �L 1 r. COMMISSION \ J� PROPOSED \ \ /1 0 \ MAMMA, '4-t� 2-14' GATE\ \\< A / n p.Tc fri • SHADY o RS Cr. `•\ Eft T r N ..:MAMA, o f 5 IRULI�'1 / �, v `) \.\ \ \ ' LINNIE JOHNSCW D ROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL // S.• vi f I V VTk LAME J7J,PAGE 195 S \, / TRACT 70.ABST No. 977 _ Y Y I I 3 L✓q Mr,•im5IIi.a•L N/In Y.ro._ 1 ' 4 co r:ISO= LIMITS COVE N'G�'' I 1 'n v I MY StcxXTAYY: {-'vom TREE COVER f V ED I 2 :F / �; / v CONCEPT PLAN FOR CS ZONING REQUEST • f , / '/ CITY CIE SOUTHIAEE P 0.8 " - Y[9 /0u If 0 l ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK ,/ DENTON COUNTY W'ST 187.20/ '_o.o o 000.' RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER A wRKY a# / / • 8 I Y 1 SERVICE BUILDING "'"." 3N 2 •g 1 1 ►U L 21 199 t Pt.utMDN VPYANn DIXT111Rt1 / l WILLIAM E.LAMOREA UX,A9. and BARBAR•�G LA MOREAUX LIVING TRUST r Ytl a%ACM[]61 N=i a p MCI! r[T DAMES D. CRANFILL AND WIFE • I BOOK 96-00182I3 DEED RECORDS RFCp J U L 2 NG usT V Y11C0.1D N COUNTY.4.511 rfUR BE KRLY CRANFILL / /FACT I.ASST.Na 1568 1 1997 OM YYCBYn] UM.COUNTY.TM. / VOLUME J077.PALE 6J7 / WO .ad pENMn YMOL LNn•. _ IRAC!IU.ABST Na ISBBA u y WOOD. OS CE / 1O ro r.TAtZ 71/" ` l I.""c a•G.CUL tune. 1097 .•.X N _.. City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-084 PROJECT: Resolution No. 97-55 Specific Use Permit/T. W. King Telecommunication Tower STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, Ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, Ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for a Telecommunication Tower on the property described as 4.5 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 992D, Tract 21. LOCATION: West side of T. W. King Road approximately 700' south of the intersection of West Bob Jones Road and T. W. King Road. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District OEQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response has been received within the 200' notification area: • William Lamoreaux, 6967 Blackwood Dr., Dallas, TX 75231- 5703, opposed. "The 401' transmission tower will be detrimental to future development of homes. A similar proposition was defeated in June 1994." P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) allow variance to requirement# la(bufferyards ); 2) allow variance to requirement# lb (landscape area and plantings); 3) allow variance to requirement # if (tower compound should be enclosed with either an 8' solid screening fence, 8' masonry wall, or a combination wrought iron fence with an eight (8') foot evergreen hedge); 4) allow requirement# 1 c (proposed tower is a lattice-type)to discretion • of engineers. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those items • addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-084SU.WPD • • City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM • July 31, 1997 RED J U L 3 01997 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-55 (ZA 97-084), Specific Use Permit for T.W. King TelecommunicationTower On July 17, 1997, Mr. Eddie Cheatham and Deputy Director John Knight presented to the P&Z Commission, a request for Rezoning and Concept Plan of the Public Safety Tower at the T.W. King water tower site. Chris Carpenter stated that the City had issued ten notification letters to Southlake property owners with one response which was opposed to the plan. He further reported that the City had notified the City of Trophy Club with a courtesy letter of the plan. It should also be noted that Denton County Commissioner Army, the Mayor of Trophy Club and the Trophy Club Department of Public Safety were made aware of these plans, especially since they were being initiated from the Denton County Commissioners Court. During the work session there was only one question asked regarding the plan. The Commissioner S asked if the City Council was aware of the proposed height of the tower when they were presented with the proposed project. Deputy Director Knight's response was they had been made aware on several occasions. There was no other discussion during the work session. During the meeting, the discussion of the project led to a concern as to whether the tower could possibly fall on nearby residences. It was explained that the type of proposed construction of the tower was built in a lattice design of ten foot sections and was engineered in a manner that, should it fall, it would collapse within itself, as opposed to falling in any type of straight line from the base. The commission would not grant a variance regarding the two to one set-off requirement, although the height that they granted for the 165' water tower which was also approved, is also not in compliance with this set-off portion of the ordinance. After some discussion, and Karen Gandy explaining that the City of Trophy Club had received a courtesy letter notifying them of the plan, it is our understanding that Denton County and County Commissioners of this area have met with Trophy Club officials on numerous occasions regarding this site. A motion was made and passed that approved the water tower on this site, as submitted, to be 1.5 million gallons elevated to 165'. The motion passed restricting the communications tower to 120', 45' shorter than the water tower that sits closer to the Trophy Club property. Additionally, the motion stated that they would not grant a variance of the two to one set-off requirement of the ordinance and they would not grant a variance of this type of construction. They did, however, state that this could be determined by the engineers as to whether it should be a monopole or lattice type tower. There was one individual,Mr. William Lamorieaux, that appeared in opposition to the tower. After the vote on the Concept Plan, SDeputy Director Knight presented the Special Use Permit for this site. It passed with the same exceptions as stated in the Concept Plan. There was no discussion or opposition to the Special Use Permit. , July 31, 1997 Page 2 • When we first began this project with Denton County, we had several meetings with the Council to discuss our intentions and to make sure that Council was aware of all of the issues, including the height of the tower, which was probably the most predominant issue. We were operating and making decisions in compliance with Ordinance 480. It states in Section 33.5 paragraph, as amended by Ordinance No. 480-U, that communications antennas or communications structures, utility poles, towers, and water tanks are exempt from height restrictions if owned by a government entity. This project had first been presented to Council during Mid-Year Retreat of 1996. After working an agreement with Denton County and having attorneys from both City and County agree on the wording, Council voted and approved a contract in April 1997. The Department feels that the safety of its Fire and Police Officers, and the citizens that may require the services of the Department of Public Safety,plus the enhanced cost savings,present an enormous incentive to re-address the height issue. We recommend that the maximum height be 401', with the understanding that the tower will probably be approximately 380'. As a side note, the Colleyville paper erroneously reported that Deputy Director Knight stated, if the tower was reduced, it would not interfere with reception and transmission. The actual response, according to the Minutes of the P&Z Meeting, was that if the tower was reduced by just 100', it would shorten the range of transmission and reception by 12 to 14 miles. • I am available if you have any comments or questions. 66 BC/bls 0 City of Southlake,Texas NIENIORANDUM S July 8, 1997 To: Karen Gandy, Community Development From: John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services Subject: T.W. King Site We are requesting the ordinance variances on the above listed site for several reasons. For the past two years we have been negotiating with both the City of Fort Worth and the County of Denton on this site. Because of its elevation and location in the city it is the optimal site to provide radio service for public safety communications for our community. The problem we face is poor and often a total lack of capability of transmitting information from the 9-1-1 center to police and fire services. This hinders the effective operation of these emergency services in providing swift and efficient responses to the needs of our community. Further it endangers the lives of the emergency service employees providing these services. 0 An example of this would be a large structure fire that occurred on N. White Chapel. Because of the poor radio capability we endangered several firemen because they could not communicate with each other. We were forced to send people from location to location to exchange information to keep from getting someone seriously hurt. On several occasions police officers have been out on traffic stops and disturbance calls where they unable to communicate for assistance or back up units. Fortunately we have not had an officer injured because of the lack of radio coverage. We have experienced problems with being able to communicate with Care flight. This has caused delays in getting them on the ground and delayed the transport of members of the community to the hospital. In this agreement with Denton County they will provide us the use of their system at no cost in exchange for the use of the above mentioned land. They will also build the tower and provide for all of the associated cost at their expense. At the present time we are operating on the City of Fort Worth's system. The coverage is still not effective to eliminate areas in the city where we have problems communicating between field units and he 9-1-1 center. Also on this system we have to pay a fee for every radio that is placed on the lio system. If we stay on this system it will cost the city in excess of$100,000 for the use of the REC'D J U L 0 8 1997 system next year. This figure does not include the cost of the radio equipment itself. Over the 1 0next three years with our expected growth, we expect to pay in excess of$250,000 to the City of Fort Worth for the use of a system that does not give us satisfactory coverage. I i I can not stress enough that this particular site is the very best for radio coverage in this immediate area. That the necessity of better coverage is essential for the safety and security of 4 our community and employees. Please advise if I may be of further assistance in this or any other matter. { ,77 K/jk cc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety S 1111 REC'DJUL 08 1997 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM • July 1, 1997 To: Karen Gandy, Community Development From: John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services Subject: Proposed Tower Site T.W. King The following are responses to your letter dated 6/19/97. 9. • A. I am unable to provide drawings at this time. The tower and building have not gone out for bid. However, the request will be for the tower to be constructed of galvanized metal which will allow for more effective maintenance. The supporting structure will be pre-fabricated type structure with concrete/gravel type outside wall finish. The only wiring exposed will be that necessary to extend between the antenna's and the radio Sstorage building. • B. Attached are copies of the propagation maps that were provided to us from Motorola who is the vendor for the radio equipment for this project. Originals have been requested. • C. Chris Carpenter with your division requested and was provided with an overhead view of the property and surrounding area which shows the adjoining houses from the city GIS division. • D. Again the above mentioned view will provide adequate information as to the density of the surrounding vegetation. It indicates the bottom of the site is completely obstructed by trees and brush that already exists on the site. Our proposed fence is chain link construction 8' in height with 2' of barbed wire security on top of the chain link. The fence will be equipped with an alarm to detect invasion of the location. The entire ground area inside of the security fence will be covered with rock. The reason is to provide easier maintenance of the facility and a safer environment within the compound area. • E. The lighting that is being bid is for FCC/FAA approved low intensity white strobe lighting that is less intrusive to the surrounding residences. • F. Backhaul is not applicable for this site. This system is for public safety communications only. • REC'D J !' - 11997 • • G. Certificates of insurance will be provided once a contractor has been selected. • 10. While the ordinance calls for monopole type construction, towers of this proposed height are safer if they are constructed in the lattice type design. While the proposed tower is a free standing type which will have no guy wires, it is designed to collapse into itself in the event of structure failure. 11. The reason for requesting a variance on the height of the tower is for one reason. This tower and radio system is being designed to provide service strictly for the use of city and county governments in this immediate area. This site will service the entire public safety departments for all of the south end of Denton County and the North end of Tarrant County. Not only will it provide for the use of a radio system for the Denton County Sheriffs Department and the City of Southlake, but for Trophy Club and Roanoak as well. Both of these neighboring communities operate now on the Denton County system. 12. Because of the limitation of the property itself we can not meet the requirement of a two for one set off. We therefore request a waiver of this requirement. As stated above these types of towers are designed to collapse into itself in the event of structural failure. The reason for this site is imperative because of the height of the property allows for construction of the project with a minimum expense to the taxpayers of the involved entities. And it allows for the maximum radio coverage needed by the various public safety departments to provide life safety services. S13. As stated above this type of construction will be required in the bid process which will be provided once the contract has been awarded. 14. The FCC/FAA applications have been completed and are being processed. Once approval has been received a copy of the licenses and approvals will be provided to you. 15. Again as stated above the fence will meet the code with the exception of the type of construction. We are proposing the use of chain link of 8' in height with an additional security top of 2' of barbed wire for security. The reason for the request of variance is due to the security alarm system for this site. This type of construction allows for needed construction material to properly operate the alarm system should an attempt to intrude the area occur. 16. The height of the equipment building proposed is 10'. This will meet the standards set out by the ordinance. 17. I am aware that a"High Voltage" sign and a Knox Box will be needed as part of this installation. These requirements will be met. Please advis if I may be of further assistance in this matter. JK/jk / 0 cc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety i I 3 - I t e ii2ip:14 • P fixides tai IIP: _.0; , Mr" 61 WNW U r 1 il. 11111111111 istiar . ._ . : I or.A" ' i 4# i,' 111 i / - f • co' A4IPU s 'i \ AM \ Fr preFtv .10" ... 6.s. 4 2 .'I i. 1 (PI- 1 0 TRACT MAP II T, C17 g I _r= f (---- - ---\ 1 \\ s,,,,,0* Mill.... _ �, I 7 _ - 7 - _.-rc 7 II II 11 AG AG TR 9 16.32 AC M. GILBERT M. GILBERT Y N. so 2, II TR 8 i9 4.43 AC h^ II I O O (v CV M. GILBERT I � TR 19 4 AC 21 U 4 AC AG AG I . J. JONES • I ' TR 20 AG 2 AC L. JOHNSON II TR 2 II 1.00 AC • R. SAVAGE AG AG AG jII W. LAMOREAUX i W- LAMOREAUX �I TR 1 TR.2 • 15.62 i ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING SPIN #1 CARA WHITE . 7CD ` C; City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 97-084 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for SUP - Denton County Radio Transmission Tower Service Building being 4.50 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: City of Southlake Cheatham & Associates 667 N. Carroll Avenue 1601 E. Lamar Boulevard, Suite 200 Southlake, Texas 76092 Arlington, Texas 76011 Phone: (817) 481-5581 Phone:(817) 548-0696 Fax: (817) 488-6796 Fax: (817) 265-8532 Attn: Gordon Johns CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. The applicant has requested a variance for the following requirements: a. Although the required bufferyards are shown, the applicant requests a waiver of the required bufferyards due to extensive tree cover. (P & ZAction 7/17/97: allow requested variance) b. Applicant requests a waiver of the required landscape area and plantings due to extensive tree cover. (P & ZAction 7/17/97:: allow requested variance) c. All towers shall be of monopole construction, unless another type can be shown to cause less visual impact on surrounding property. The proposed tower is a lattice-type. (P & Z Action 7/17/97: allow at discretion of engineer) d. Freestanding towers (for two users) shall be limited to one-hundred-twenty feet (120') in height. The proposed towers is 401' in height. e. Towers constructed adjacent to properties used for residential purposes shall maintain a 2:1 distance to height ratio. Due to the approximate 401-foot height of the tower, the minimum setback shall be 802' from all property lines sharing a common boundary with residentially used property. f. The tower compound should be enclosed with either an 8' solid screening fence, 8' masonry wall, or a combination wrought iron fence with an eight (8') foot evergreen hedge. Applicant proposes 8' chain link with 2' barbed wire screened by existing vegetation. (P & Z Action 7/17/97: allow requested variance) • -7 �, - II City of Southlake,Texas 2. Provide the following additional information for the telecommunications tower/antenna request: a. Elevation drawings (signed and sealed by appropriate licensed professional) of the proposed tower, including the locations of all exterior wires and/or cables necessary for operation of the antennas and the equipment building proposed on the site. Label the type of finish on the tower and building as well as the height of both structures. Confirm that no guy wires will be utilized in the installation of the tower. b. The propagation map provided does not appear to show the complete coverage area. Please clarify the extent. The propagation map should also be signed and sealed by appropriate licensed professional. c. Certificates of insurance in compliance with § 45.8 IV K 2 of the zoning ordinance. 3. All towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure should fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunication towers. 4. Provide the FCC/FAA approvals as well as certification of compliance with ANSI and IEEE Standards. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and • filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which may require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 8/11/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Cheatham & Assoc. John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services, City of Southlake L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97084CP2.WPD • -7i, -I1 • • 0 . SHIfL $CT. NOTE-LONIO1 INTERVAL=10 FEET I % Op R, n k CATEGORY OF USES 1•" I Tv( TI �"!1 ELEVATED WAVER STORAGE _ Y RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER �. ` j SERVICE BUGGING 1�T f ',7 I - .I PROPOSED 10 FT. WIDE, Va UYf J JI.PAGER I$�3 i VARY ASS.EDA No.9 TYPE B' BUFFER YARD\ ) ) I TRIG!4 west:No 9Q7 VOLUME Jvz PALE 513 SITE INFORMATION S/TE '.ao ,a: I .1. NORTH - WEST - SOUTH\ W0•x,LWy pLxL o If Nu TRACT 9,ASST.No.971 EXISTING ZONING=AGRICULTURAL `.~ 11 L' I /ONWL I`...Mau y i WO•WO.,al6rrr avaw/wt PROPOSED ZONING:CS-COwwU TI SERVICE Yr FWwvc• tDIKN+Wu LOD=MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL � I GROSS ACFRAGE 4.5 ACRES >< II AST / 1397.00' NET ACFRAGE=3.94 ACRES I,r -7 ` n TOTAL FLOOR AREA=319 SO.f7. J /I///...iii ..�i 3 ONE(Or _ "`.� _ ��a "um[Y/SDNG�' [.F Ja1Y' ; 1.L' `4 `u , N 7RL COY[R-+ �PROROSED Slit 1 L 1 I —_`� _.. _' - ELEEVVATED STOqAGE TANK O O J' .4LTNOUGN INC REOUIRFO 9UFFERJAROS ARE SNOWN, ` _ - HE NT - 165I FEET - 81S ELEV. I F -O O IHC APPLIC.en1 RCOUCSJS A WAIVER OF NNE REOUIRFD - -1"......--- �• N 0 RFLOW EIFV.= B01 I 1 O O VARY V£OA OLBERI BUFFERYAROS DUE TO EXTENSIVE TREE LOVER o� �� - -AS I- .. - I� 21 PAGE SJS i F�A� II' 10L UYE J7J2, / 1 ^ !KILT l4 ABs7.N9 972 '•2T 1 Ii 1 / /((��� l O I WOO.o/ASNI.[stl/Nr APPLICANT PLANTINGS A WAIVER OF INC REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA p -- 0 12C= l u \\ I CHY Pc 7/1r54r I IT H Form•.GNCurtl.Al AND PLANTINGS DUE TO EXTENSIVE TREE COVER �Yj t 1 BDGPL 93 L6N0 F AT VICINITY MAP NC\ TRACT 1E I.No 992 F / � CA- i \ -�� �� uP•NfGWW OMIIr NJO/xlul D / r0 CO L I FaNx.G• ulna it' o Cma3 'ROPOSED r I✓ CID E PROPERTY DESCRIPTION '/--- 7 el 1 . \ \; 2-1 GATES 1„,,, ��'JJJ�g�g�g...����p�p�p � E � I Beginning m m..aam..n.erns of o tract o:rand by deed m Juno Jonas and suss Ella _� i 7.0.47, t 2-016 GATES I3' ! OSsere..a.aaa.ne.e b1 a.ed or I`c or,•eo.d In valam.1ss,rap.ue,Trod R.aoraD,`(1 =a1EO, , : ORoman Couny.Team. mid polnl taco being In .'1 95-1t cot a a tract al land er GRAPHIC SCARId..d 1•rn.cry or soarnlall.o. wa.e m boob 9]-660M,n0ue Re<ordo.Doman 11Q R ! O• Coanry.Te.a.: ROSS CT. /ff1J�,1 _ � yF ^7 1 �� ITHENCE None,o disronca of 676.11 feet Io•point fora earn; \"/ 7EPOSED I I yW•m l CCC����_= 1 •.Yiil r $TOd _ . - w I THENCE East.a distance al 391.00 feel to a point fora corner In I.W.King Rood; I O< PP'---� T WAL THENCE S 08 00'00-W.a Malone or 100.00 teat,to a point taro corns; d Q H5 II �, q• CRET BUILDING' 4 •, III LL 1 `' 4• ♦ I THENCE S 23 OW 00-W.a distant•al 300.00 lest,10 a point for a I r/\���' Ll O� \ I 3 THENCE S 13 00'00-H.o distance of 43.40 feel.IN a point tar corner; J L•D ` 70'`, I 1 / I O I THENCE S 11 56•A9-W.•II.lanc.of 267.70 feet.la a DOInt far a corn.,In T.W. / ,� �� I 1 I Klnp Road; 7 %I`--1 ROPOSED • �Id E O THENCE Wu1.o dleana•of 187.20 Ieel,to m•POINT OF BEGINNING.end e 111 I r LF- RANSMISSI. I TO IT/ • • M I conlalninp 4.5 acres of land,more or loos. ( J 1 TOP ED E ATIO J 1 11p49- - O GROUND ELEVA •Yfi 16/ 646 F vJ • 1 / i I;�I i I I 12112i0 INNVRYDR-RNAINRfB l i UU I IY I I I N 3e00e0 eW TIMIUT O007 ITYN PC1-661 AVENUE 1LHo1 0.w.i SOCIA SUITE Lao 1\ l"l(1 C (r�� LOUTtlu[[,TEXAS 7ews ESSINGTON.TURN 76011 `� -1'PI / I j II 43.4 V,, (L17)NI-6DD1 coNl GORDON JOHNS R 1_ 048-00941 VI II I II 11 I i1I.IRIf AVES..R..8UECAN XYI(5 ANO(CR4 DINS I,� I-1 1� d K�1 X /RACY 14 ABSI.No.922 O 0 E Kl100 I0. PAGE 16 ..1 E I 1 to,•*DAM O/NY/1 Nal•/x1Yr z I not*•.INC a Wr \ / APPROVED BY TEE PLANNING ZONING \1 \ \ � /r'r, COMMISSION \ PROPOSED\\ \ /I �� Bern \2-14' GATE,� �j. L/4i I I - KK.uN.K, SHADY of KS cc.. O `YY`pG?� N I 2 O P.,..SUTOOTI o n t> . YY U \\ a LRIWf XYWSW APPROVED BY THE CRY COUNCIL 4 w /1 I VOLUYF 374 PAS 195 DATM t.^A q O 7 I ��RRACT 20.ABSE Nu 922 f N : 1, / 3 ) lY(�•ZdW�NG•. ,NY/NINI WYOL 1- aV F E 6�+ OR QCM7.DY: Y C t E rIrs TITLE��F I q co 5 a� F }i�i i d' I CONCEPT PLAN FOR CS ZONING REQUEST F // CRY OF 0O0THLoSL P.O . L 1S1 �7 L p u '�::v ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK �p _ DENTON COUNTY e W ST 187.210' •`e/Na 1 001•COLN sua.cr RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER s w.cr N.1m la 7'rf1 2 • l I ��/GGw/�7-may SERVICE BUILDING :.>9./„ ?:. -`9 1 1 I --�"` JUL 21199/ [:. w1 L: :l 2 / DON.•.00 ACM YN.TM HI ISO a9 P.KL\DINT / NK.L/AYE LAYMFAUI,R.and BARBAR G LAYOREAUX (INNL TRUST eCT1w.T Nw M.01100 GOYIM.IVY 'so s oERL µRANTAo OrE / I Boar ACT F.ABS Dl D SIMI s REED J U L 211997 D"° 'O&DE ON M�""E'�A' TRACT F.ARSE N /SBB VOLUME J027 PAGE 932 WO•ZONING ARN O y0(NTIM I LOT / TRACT Z ARSE N. 15BB bO OS CE / aw r ' a M.DxrNr/ IUNL 1097 r..0.0.L M-M a M SI-M ous, orra 1 • Denton County Sheriff' s Office inikvr .tt 1� [ {.. a4'�a 3"' y '$ �w��'";= ' 3 r:: 0 ' 91 a a' E '?f, � a 4▪y• A,Lk ' 3-=' aj'+ 3 1..i i. i' r±. #s i E6m.1. a. F may' }�";-1- �{'r4 2e'. a;i !c!i[' c 's 6•. •'4{-t a,, r.: -.,r a_s . � ;Xavy-sal*� � •.. ' ..F '�'. `' ,�''1 '....`d„- races "`' ` • % - r- t • x1! ..'+ :.- x^ 'S.s C f-.L _ l( yt" .FS �� y >.s 0' a si^ ,' • � �r - wr t ,'°bi e i z` 9 iP .,. +A. I $'+ ` <--` rsi .*$,' • r 7..' `£[ c . t.yam 'k' —'aj to -+oy.`�nP.g° �!H��'.Lw-• � 'S i `3" � R` • 4., i m..e• ..* Ilse .w ` ''. 'a ? •'�' "`is s .wax..: ' --y ._. " �IJ'1 .pSaR Sw> a� T. _ 2+ fryr s •'trw [ 4 xe� �t bk '. " y. � 7f.T.. • '+•`< r 1,,,, a' • ..,...• ---4.•-_ d' ', l y., F r ' 'Y"".'•JF% J+s-• 4 R. �("5,.... r1 •4. s: e. y . +BLS Y+ L `—.._ ' $ Y • -firetilik.. • 1 t .may `9 • Y �' �t 3s`L !A 'r q�lf C'?, $" 7!� -C ice`. • J+ u in s2 .C;. 'Y." 9ai� i k Sly "" M .s' _ N.� r '.: t. k :_ y '" cs .....+1"=, .r '•, SET.ti3i • -gRhf �j� aetl_4 ,rrw _._i ... . +sue^ ^",.� ,,,, ▪.., 1 - YF Ij-..4.g.„I.7 it..**.... V, _ ti fib" �'' '�"' �` a ..1 l•� ,l F +zr. ,< 3 .n�i�ii�" 1� S y71, ,,ajri'r a a y ,'��j „� 8oj _ z t p — $ r.Gc �1 7' ,.�i T' --"7- • s.. b Vit ..... ...„....„ ::... .....v... . . ,.. _-_,a4viasa,_ ,- . _ '4 -- , ..._ rtl;; j!'. - `� `r't r� a. aF -:r ss -aa• 1' - t 9p 44 95 .Q MOTOROI+A, INL • Siam cast Base To Secure 4 Level Portable Ana rsia Calculated values are dezlved Field Unit In BniLdinq j using averaya loss v3:3ea for q I surroundings. Some Lev lying I�. I I I I I, . ' I - I heavily wood ed or urba. szeas SCALE 5.0� MILES PER INCH nay result is Lifer a e3 ,, ` than those indic_._d. > : 12512423d' Meld Unit ��5 : 1.19Av(-105.5 ) % (` er : C17916 ;Yield Unit eat St 3.0 it. I. [fit l"T N ��J •r'{ 0�l25/1935 i eld Unit ant Type : { C/V ' •'•"..,; ''' a ' ••• •00',.:,31 friK001,11030/02164$0„/ , /••••-,ZVI••:,,t ,....,. .....•,, _. ~It . 1,v:„„:. . •,,,,:gt y..:, . . ., "4‘61,'Y. tV'..'.'P',. ",• . 16 J. % ..,,,NIF.:er-r‘'-.0l0.-l''''Xir.Z ''4, ."ktitf.W.44.44ggl$0#4,1"•*M-:' tt=seit7;I-41MP ,A#''....11=1" 4 .- Ztt.On4..*,..'' '.'i - k P14'I f.i. .4.9• .....,..t. ,, ,:.,•‘..„ •, „,. • .,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,..„- •, ,4,,,t. ,. ...„ .• v.:. ,- 04, -. .. -, - '' q'fill'411' *4"' • ' l'O",•,Ai',4‘. ,,,.e,''4: . !i4,'.' ..'it. . AZIr,444 OP i tt.44;,:-11 i,•-,,....P•.,, ,A ,c,,,.,,,,,-..,,, , .„,-4. .. -..„„,..•. ,,:,,,,,tR, ., '-.,--,•*,...._ ,1:', 4:.4- I •--- fi, """ - ' ei• '*--.-4-'7"- ;- ''. • . •. .0, Sod . . ,,, P. , 4.-K • -a., , .t.rod.r.....7,-itt, , r 1, '' 4. • - V. id . ,.• ,,r., f••., ;.• - ,,,,,,,p. • "' -,.,.,.,',A , ,• - ,o° , '"4 •t.- t 4,•„ ",. .1, .4 4„`.4,4 •. !*::' , ... •,'. eti1,r,,, , -1,44 v.0 4,, ., ... "t''''•44., 4 a. ..,., .,„.... . , ,..,... t .p,;..C.•:',, . ' ;IA ,.-•4‘,- • _ ,6.',., .'•:•• •-,,...,- ,1,,,,,N-',...4.0.. • - .' j+--.: • ' ,.- ,-,,tt L . .. ,..' kt.',.$4.. f' . '''.4t ,,'",!' le • ,„. 41, -0 ,.i •4.6.,1 ...Tr . <$:„ 'k 'i''.// .MV:e?t` le'1 .14;;EI •4 A 44,4, •.-••• ProliP, .4,,,.'t t'Pd94.t','•:' ,' .r -,A,' ,•J'Ia :,.. ' •'. ,•, aft? --;I Itl•••:4' ' • • t A •%.'11 C'4 ."•••:. • .44 ,,i • •' ' •'.•'1;• .„is.,•,' -.4 • .4„,,,f, ..4.rvi,I.,.. .,Ii.m.7,Le. ..0,44,,,va. ,.,ii,.t. :,-,' ,:u. ..,,,....-,,,74,4y.f:,,, ,.r.,, ,;, ... !,..a gwvi....wilmet ,,,,,,,,, , . ,,,, ,,,,.. ,,14„ .A,.,ism 446?) :01,441 w. ... t. , ..... 4',4, :.''''t141 \.. ''S.:'.•,.'•+ '' .,,i, 4, ,4.15144,. , •t.,. •1 ' '•';')i,'‘''''4`ii,-4'At . '. ',''''.4.,*Ii.'''^,"' ' .' ----• '", , f 4 tr4f, -:,- Jr .,"•,-,t4r* , •* "* oic,,,,,vieit" .,-?.:taijil( 1.,,t, ,,-1", ...__,Aliarot 4 , 444.'''.• ' #1,4 X,;re. \Ail;4 1 •t, .,h-t•4. '•••• .. 'y ;, ,. ., .;0' 1'4 b- ' • •E••3.,..,,,,, ..,,,•-4, ,.•. ,4.,, •Nx,,,k,.. ,444.i ...0,„.1,,•;." . "'",* • '•• 4, t •Iti -.V,11•-• lt.:-,44t, ., ••,f; ' •, ' b-•--91116°. • j' OR 1 Olitir' a 'et ro. :. , ,Ar. .1. • i '' .,r,r,,,,, .t.„.1.4" 1.4. , ,,,z4,...‘, fire.4, ,e,, .044 • ''- 4...‘ ..- .3,. i,..i . ..' - No, 44, .. ': r'' •kt,•-•,' •••'' '4.` .00' • • ,,firt • ,, at.. •-•"... '0,t,"#.14, r,' `Li. - - ., . 4,iyit„.•: • . . , ••• ,•• ,„••• . , ,,... . "4, a-.•,:t. 4"rWar,,Ir6j,um ‘7.,1•••• . .34 •4•2t•• '.•• .?Id,• `, 00.44,.., " ‘r . v• ,,,Ck,' ''''' - ,..,.,•,,1:.: . ,,:.41•-. .44 • 1 79.4 • ' dd *144 ' •, ' .14,24;le, Ir.k4.1 .C' al ?lit r.. al • ....,..,- ..,-'4....L; 4,,,,,?:-,„„,,r.i ifv,„,,,,,,, .. .., „ . , ....., :AN, ...t.4,1t,', „.. ,,t7. : ,-,t, ,,,,...,. , '.' „4",...„,,, . .• t inake.. i/ . --.3 ,. 1‘...1 `,...1-.•" • D .ktitrl'i,iff r %•'. e . til,,,,,j. ts rb.,,„„i ., .,.. . ., .4 f)•••1 >. if, "• iri- . itott,14- 10. ••' • •• 44 , ' 44 - ".%,4.V.:'..At,' " • r''''• ii ) '.1,e' ..7) -, ! .4"• . 5-11',Pr ,, ' t& •„d ...', 'fro'il .--'. ' il ifi.4,a.- - ,. , •.,• k 1 1 . 1 3 ei„1,,.i ,•,..?..,-,,...‘;• •.t , ki,4,.. . - ,..er ..,3114ii., •! i° ) '1,... . .•.'4444, •„V:41 4,,',, ,`. ..4.1 - • . . ,.....1 .' ,i''' , .„..e. .1 tc,„;;,,,,.....2. . .. *;.• .;;;!.,-' -Itaft" '. ' 1 lel- '' I ' '4,c ,rt4 -•,,,,, •-; 4'4 ,';'`o...- .. -00-, i,t, ,,.,,,,,,.. e.m.w...,, 01 ,,,,,,,,ikr.". ,Nis„,„-4;!Aw 114,..../.640.11 :•-...,:,ffl.. . Et ...... )4;4).64 0',t . 't41 .1111 4444.. . • A .... 11114 ' • i I if gr---4,-- , . 4 i rr--"la 1,c* ,... -,0-"-4/i"..:444ktiv a . ,/ ..•.'' t; ..-. Illf 1 tilrl I -nr.; , ONCNIN r, ;Re--'..','''T'''.r.'1,'"It.r. ...i,-,, 4CV, 4.06,..:„. :"'t • . 3 r, "4;0 r. ' ... ,.I • , 't" ' , ,k. ' • ' ' tti • ,:t....4, "." • ' iv, lry •,. act ,r, 4 ,1 ..." O. - .,...' z-..b:' •• . ,, . -- %. - , ,,I - ii.'. .74,%,..s• '''''' ''' ::::::..T..,' 44,41?•.,-,i 9i,, ,.,.-. ,, ,-,1 i.,-:v '3441. , -1 .. • ."Kt. ---'.'.4:,;;I:/' 1 ao • ' .,4...- ,.!,, iihil s , e, ;,,,:-.•. v:, .ylv I-2.-;:,.,,,,... .. '4' , ,,,,,,„,„... , ..,,,,:,.„., , . ,,,. . _ of.„.,,, .. „,....-. 4,-, ,04. ' ••- :.. .,..i,.,r.A ,,,, , .s :4,. ,..,..,,,,, ,,., A 4.0,50 •.•,.t. , 7- ,,-.,, ,,,at , X:."•,' 4j4,4- , ..41 ,P.Zhl ,, ,,,, , , iv , .•,,r'.,,,,-".' *. . '4',..', . 6,-.1(1; :. . 1r--. . 46,4 .4.3,. ,,..,,,.,. • ,. %, . ,„.,2" . .:,,i . .‘,;I, . ',Am:, , ,,„. ., ..„,.. . .. .:•-/:•,-;,,,,e,.;;... ..4iik:.4., -* 'Of''.<''. ''' 'A'1 •'41:-- . ''' •'4,•••,,,,•;•,,,i.. "e•.i, 64N4A,91.:'*. 4..-. 4.4 Ilk . .': ' ,il'it....ovt,. ...•*, ,,..,th, 7..i.``q.,1% .....;', -•,4:„ . .. ti• • •-'';,•4'".'•' ,;i '-• *- ia:'- 0". -'-'‘. --.1 I -• •,--•..--- ,,, ••-. ,, • et 4-7r,:,ii-4.'iTiol ...0,.voimial.,., •, ,,,,..,,,,o,„4,,,, . ,,i,..-4..,006,,,,,,,,t,,,....,,,,.,-- --4"0,44•1„4•;,4,, t.,:'-,:,,,;...., '"*"'31.'fi '14..._..,"' 4's .. ''''''''' '''. ':. ' ‘,4•4,4''• . ,....-e., 4',74,:%;" ..:,,,,,;•t,,,,,i,'-e.4 4 . Ai)1111611WW 0,dr. r.toisim.M.,. . , r.-,:1:3_,,,Arc a Witdia'4 '''. .,.. . -,. . ',',. .,..,,,,,i,,,,,,„' ....c...m„,,,4 , - i-.',.'.4;0#10,4:12..',4 --4..afi-so-.44%,-, .1. - ,., -....4,1-' 74#44.4-4:':- "•-•ii.-- . ''' i'''''' 4'4''''','—....,•••::::--;4":, ...,. :474i,toffilig,,,'''':'''''Coy!if--.4....,.". 'AL- t,../4'' 41. „-' , '..-444M''-‘"s, ':,;••'. .. ,•te-,..•..-''' .:'"Wri-,;.:4' „. . . . •. . - ,. ....-,,._ .-',,..-- t../-49.-:-,-,vr-- . , -.,, , ,.. ,„.'ss'''' '" "I• '''k, '7071:1, ',, '' '''i,'. ''..,..1... .134,,i.eig'.44.!itntitZ,"•'-,-7c31„.Ar. V'. .'-!:•"1".'At*,-,.••",••••-...„•_.4f.,•i.,-1,',- ,x,,,,%'4-,......34,e':. 1,1f)., - ..,"•:,,,%...' ,• , ..;--..• .-n.• . • _..1.,,,;p, 'r;'. 1' - ' ,• ..i•ri,W':-'''..S.,...•tii';'.4 ':...*,"r.l'Aft.,111:itv7f.t77:0%,' ..' l',,/,tiq' " u`a'r'""'''.<1 '".•'" ''4. ti-'4ks,,. ...0 -4' '..',re •,t‘•1' i'.!!'.-. ri!ONO.;''"•.'"''''•' '''''.'” - l'159Att. g44t,"-k4,4.4;"1. 4.43hr"„ift, •-s•. 5.•,,,A7-7,14,p.„.1).-trit.63,air,-,•li, ,':t• - 4";.41th .'' ,,k ``44'''''":'YU; '' .". ','. ''".....fr:'.. t' ,1-'r •-.., ItOu' ' • '; ...' r.4' ,':'' ''' . ' ,' •1••••,, -it' • -,.i. • i.-1 ti:tk •i".-•..g.-,, e ' 'L'f.I.$:',••;i4.-r.g,-ift.ig ,'1,,,,•44.4•4;4;-.,' 'e.' ,-, - .._,.. • ,,,,.4,.,.. „.,--.•,":'•.,.- . , ,,• • 4„;-;,.- 4„, ,:. . , ., ,t,........,,„...,. ..• ,. .:', 1.,,,,,,,..„„,...., •,_,_ ,-„4...„, , t.:4,,',,vx,.-.:,? ;•..,:t..,1.,,E1,,,,,„.‘,,t,,,,=:..,lt,•,'". ..43,-,:•,..kk,44,,Sat, 7-4, 'cat3' , ,-• "G,.,t'46;„,...;.,;.„..4i .. -. ..,.... ,. . ,,,t... ..., ,,. 4 4„„,- .... ;,. .t.,..s,,, •.„ . ,, „ , , ...44,..,,,,544, s,..„„1, - I; `I, ,...y•r:::••:.‘ ..4:••••, ,t,g,14,1;k6.1.vir•f7M)il.0 ,t, ,,, - le, -• .%. .1' . ... , ,4`.2.,,,,,;-.'-,... .,,A;.4,,' -:. AJ.t.T.4 , - .740. ,1;.,.,,,...z.,:•:•• .•‘,- .,, • -.4,:„.4,-.1,,,,, ,.., ,,;....f 4 0 ,4 ,4•L`-4", ,,,r l,.;'•'.4V- .......--vt)«.-4:,,,-9-,,,Itzi.4,41,'...i.. ••., • •. •-‘,..(z-,,,, ‘ !•,- •-• 1..Y.- 7,4-,-P -, ••,,•-• - ---- . ••••q• •-, , --. ..,:.p.:,,,, ,, --*.• . ----,-,.:-,..-.,...• ,- -- ,,- , .4 rAvi4t, litINii.; .„:',,," '',';..,..g.4Z41,,;.., .:. ; ,„'',,,,,_. .4.,,st, , w AL ...,1; ,., •,'4,,., ' , A,4. ..,f;ikIts%‘,14.,:i4,.,,,,,4;1:,4!„.1 1.,.-'...;m3:4---i_1_,..4, : ,...,', . - ., , . „•• • - - - •- • --.. ••. .. • , .-0,.,* '".„. •`...4-....,:',.... . : . , ... ,., ...',......,,.4), '.,., _..,.,. r.tx,`,;.,,....4:30.1,z41..,,,yi ji .. . s ,Arat v, .-crokliz.the, -,-,,:;,10,,,,,,;:v,i-*17,,..w,,---.„,„.,,,t,,,,, ,:. ,. ..... , .,. ,,, - ±,r.i,' tiVP.,.1;'*A.4,•,. ,-.o....rr . -. 4, , -•-•-.7,-*-ty•.,44,- - -- (- ,- - - ••,--!'-` . 4 4,?..tt.,..;,•?.z4c,,i,;•i,,,..4,v,,‘,114•,,,;:i.,04.47„;.11r;-.;",4x,i,t .v. ' ',... ,, ': '''• i O. ;„trIN•15,.4.,.., ,:TV,..02,,,,,,,'.1-11/"•;#.„ii, ,lii;:rep:...A4,-;-,,"..,, „.- ,, --' `'.fl. •• -:4-•.' ` ii,, 2,- •f..' t;?;-‘'''''"-;••:-y•I'.2 .0,.' .•'. .. ,,-14.1',7•AT•ti'er *.:,• '•,:,, :••• ,•'',,*-A4,M ,•i&4 : ' • Y-: - -,...,t',...4,,r,,i4; ;-, • •',.r. 4 -,••k•JA,•-, '•':ir-' V, " - '",.L.;,,,•,1 0 ,'', -''' .''. '," ' 0,--‘46d1%1, • '':''•-'Pk.L": 441411,2t.Mg ! ' ',,,,,,;f4•‘• ''Krt, IN ' r krX.:411S;dn' ..'04. iff'4;0% Af 44, 4. it '-, ' "•::'''',a- •'r',,,,,,'•r•:,' " , ,.s,'1•••. f'• i %.4.., I',•44 om,A•- '. '\-It•tiswe ,--ArT,.„ft, :' -,'''', ' '''.--•'"'"" '-4-, '5, e'4'4°1 S'•'•'''''''''',4••..,4' s'`‘ ' ' T- •'.IrtriVtl.;itt9C6;#71'..4 414',i; '71. K Pl..' ra: kw' ' -:',,,i,' f *'''''‘O'._4,1:' '"1* .''.rio;#'40 314•'.4 A•:,,. %., '''*.•• 414 1-c'.'•''' - ' • ,,,,;•',• 1,0 ,,6 .' , . ,ti•••••+.;'0',-.. ,,W,.?1,.'.i),,,,!'!.-,..1dY,44.71,,,l'i;-...,,,\''''•?t •-"....'-c ','',k• -ex' 1,'",6,j4 Z„,,,,.,,,tritoi.1,;•_1,„, • ,, x , vtic 4-,•,,;:. 4,t•-•--.• , . -----sit' :- 4-t,....4,e4,1,••'4z,','t ', -. -, ."', t....41,44*-t.,!..0 y . -, ....,,-,50. 4% :- + s. w-t; 1:;;U:.5,,,,41,1J...±.441;4/..„2%.,..'il-, ',.,..4,'.:474..,.(,,,s' ,..,.4-.4 • 7,,,..,/,''. ,,:...;:,,P , .-,' ,,, ',?-4. ` , At'...4*.'•-•'..,+,'.,; ....t1N...- ''',.,,,,-.*',ye.T.;E,.,4„. ,„k..''.i‘,.,...,..*.44. ,:?,,',',,,,r...., 1 P.1 pl. trt'''''''..7'-''. ..%.,,***1193, l'•le ',.'::')7,14,.„..-.„-+ ...,:l.).1i,v.,-..:04#4,,,,,,- _....- . .,,,,,,,, ,,,, . ,,,.. , ,,,,,,41'...t..•ri- • r • . ,,.y.f,,,174., ., ;.',, V.-#1, •It,itt"414,,t , .11$. 4,, .. A • 1(..,;-:•,1*.f 7,...tir 6_0410thir • . “: -4 w, -• , ....,-- .. - , , .., • 'dr, ', . t ?.,e,, '''-''.4i;•c" ..N.3'"4'4471V-.a:'''''''''1•4r4t4.1.tAffte' 'I' ' .-4.474.'....41.11.1. ..V''-r";4.14' -.5d , .'',,•'',kzu,a-. ,,,. , ,~,,,v4 I ' . .10 . .';'.,0 *. ,' +'‘ 13,...P' ,. ':,,;•,,•'3'; ,,.4 -.''I'4 •, • —. Ar- _ ,, we'.c''' ' • . ,,.,14,490 „,p2,441*,.,. v.r...*?..,-?c,,",-.,4:,,,,t,,;..4...,,,,111, „ti"-, AZ.'-0,,fr t, • ,,,,,„A4ki:.. N. ; ,,,,,ii ,„034„44.',..-.‘_:•': ' ',•.• ,;. ".",,' ..-,--,..4.4i.4 f..0..41.11#:+0.4.4,54440•004:k40.12Y54;y444,4".-*:0•'447a.,e,'.. ',,,' ';',..‘Arr4 ..,' 4 1,,,,c,,,cre,. 1 t. .053,- .. --,..„ .--„.-- ., - :.,,,,,,,,1;1.N.4r ,'''''/../',rar'' , ' - ' - - ' . ''1-'''37•'-'1‘ .t.i,'..,:',','a..k4lee;t0) „,,f7-44:•'1F1t. ,-17,,,t*gbtli.,1,0; ',;'''', ,':`'.'?!..t'-';f!''.,,,,,,,,a,,,,,, .. - ,,,A3e.1..,14.,,,,z, - . i 4---',47t.,..ifil-„,•. .,, '-'-',, ,,,,41,.. -",'-••- -, • -,•-. - - . - • N•iiAti,..."7, . ",.1.'''..Vs'itri'iy.t*"44,',tit14,4-V=M*.V:r k 4,'''040; ,..- ',.',,',1:: :,".-,... ...:. ,,,,,,,,,,,417.N., r'''4 .• }".--,404,;• ' ' ' -•,-. •...‘..- , . ,,,t. ..., '''.4'';'**'1''''• ••:`, 1',."‘r9 ":•''''',4,44;4•17.r4fitl,'..-4!3 '1`91141*,-.•44,1'`,.,,,-,i•',V, ,- i,-ttti•,, .' '•-',' '4-1t,444;4.4'fl." .4v t. N',..' -' . ,.N.',•;;Err:t`-*',,.' -' ,'• • .Y .'1' N :,.::44,:r• 4, . <0,11.1.4!;, Itt .. •_ -„,;:,,,, , ilf4,,,,,,,,,,...r,...„,,.„.in ,,,,,,,...-., ,- • .,,,,t,-iiv',tN.,-e!,.,41*,'4z.,:1:,!ittt;r,..V.t.tfese%.fp,t-ii'41 .. .•/?‘,.„,..41,,t.,.„,itti.m. . v,,, k,f,..0,,,,,,L, ; 1.: ,..0,1 !,..,,, ,..kv,,,,, ,,,,. ,...-, , 7 ,,, , ' .,,,,.,t7,i•3:. . ,-- . , , 1 :. , •.c-1 . . t.1',4 :4,14.,;-, k -- 1,4,;_-..k, b•.4i.;,.34..f• '•,,tfy",'"•1;•;••144'1,3"--4e;c4.-,k,t''''a N'',`„,4,,'•tv, .•4-•• 4,- 4'''' '.,,-I----i-,•;" .• 4 ' 10"1:-. . ''!V,`,1,,.:i ,•i',. '''' t, ' ,11.., ,rf:..•',@, '- .,i---,- ' ..; , • •.- - ,.. - ' - '- #. '.•:;•:47r.,7.':7•;'7:717•/••4%',1•••,•;:.••••••''' - '14,4P-A4i•-•,-,••.f.- 171:f;itt,•'•••7',4.••,;•kZ1V•C:4 -CS.4.44 'F .1.1/4,p7‘14'•'' ft.%0-5 ' i'V- '"• ''' 1-:'•'‘•• Z"•(•'.. '1 Iii.4Y‘-4'1/44'' f 00' :'' -.' '•• • - • ' ' • • " . '' 1,9•Yri$330•50oill.--47,ita •j•itlet,O;iikc441.A .41ir*- Atplt 'A."1$,*-'J-.7:µA•• . -.:•• . 464 . ..--..., ,:,4 ' -'•••' - ---'' --. ' • feer1.4'...'..?•*"‘ i•,•,•••'••••' ' .'' ' , .- '• . ^ . ' ..0•:',4`i'ii.t? '.' • &11.,;:04'''••...,,,.riyr.,X.4::,A".4ti4,',..:,,,,e,t ,'S.‘if.•...:',int'ir.-4,4•f•At,,,A''.•-ri,,V....i,. xs.F.,eipel-,;‘,N.,, .4 ;''',. ' (.•4!.. NA.,,,d:,,t. . ,.6,.r.. •• ''''' 4 ''''', ,,„„,,.. ,...,., .,... .• . ' •. . r • •-- , . '. `'.., .' • f. `4,'.,'''''''r'ii;,044. 42' ,..,,,ter'44:4",,,:t.'"•‘,- ...):e-1,,),d.ficItkite. ,,,,...Ve+,.. . „„rgri'l,-11•2•*.. .,,. ....1.'."'.'d:', .-"s-4‘41`1114-'' ?tt.Aire";4":1-'rt....r5 rili,.; ' ,n-',4,i.„1„,,t, ',...4.,A..,,,,,--.- , - "I - - '' ..„ -:',',-;,:zir,'AAfo,,,,ci,?.,,,, ' - '....--k-,-. ,,,,-,,,41g-a,A,-, --' - - ' --,... ,,,r4,..., wt'. -, A---e,.,••,,,,•• No, ,,t-Tkq'i, '170,',,.: -„4.' ,,, ' '''.'I: '' ' '; " '. - ' - . '' ''' .., ' !.1 .14' ..;;),...iy ,,fi., . '''.'-' ',4.4>q“,-f,,4,.,,,e,—,., ' - ,,... wv.,; -.,444,„y., ,u,,,., 4 k,,,•.„1., ,,,• .,,,,,7•11.,. ;'•,,' .,'•,• er'.',,,,,•t'•''''.''.'''A''''',4z-''''''`:-'- '-'' ''"..'.'' ' ' ' • ' '.- ,.'', ! ----'7-f'''''-''.:7'','''''' . • '''' ''.° 4-4:: );,4'•'• .^.''-''`J.:'. •4P4q. :,fl.''4.'.•‘. .-to'',-,,--C.'.' ' ,•,,-.,4•,,• -- 04,4. .. ,, ,t,.•..,-,. •-t,•....Y•• ,:• 's'.."."-',','•t_, J.'.- . ,-..,:,...• --,• , - ,,,,,,,,,y-•,„,,,, •,-, ,,,'••• •'•-•.. •:' • . :',„•7"Li. '--f*„?....",,,,,--4,-'-''•• "..'-C,'-'" '''''''''''* ''',' ,' ' ' ..,,,.,..TAT,44.11.:t$V,W,,..,...,.qt,-);.: ,7,4..",--,ANY,,111-••r;A,.4,q:•,, ,..i.'••-• 'f . . ..... ..........--.....* .- -....-...m...... -....-...- .....-.-...-.....-........ ..... ....-,........,.....,.........a..------...............-.............,....-.....-...,........ ii . house, bUlit VAG = VOLOM leYt Resolution No. 97-55 Page 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 97-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES SITUATED IN THE R.D.PRICE SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1511, TRACT 21, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "A" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for a telecommunications tower has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "AG" Agricultural District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (38)and 45.8 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, • WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a telecommunications tower on the property legally described as approximately 4.5 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 1511, Tract 21; as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A", subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. • 4. 5. L:\W P-FILES\RES-ORD\97-»TWWWPD • Resolution No. 97-55 Page 2 • SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: • j City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas • L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\97-55TWR.WPD �1�, -i .0 • • 0 7� snll 5 CI vur(-coO UAR INIr4Y4.lo till .I1 I �t ( ' r 9 CATEGORY OF USES :s._:-.471._.,. � �y Lyi V EIEYA/(0 04710 SIGMA C I CrgW H..I Y01010'IRAN5Yl35/0N 10w(RLj1 5(RYlc[iu2anc ;Ir( , <..I /- PROPOSED 10 FT. WIDE\ ) WAWA'JP IMRE If SS PACE>OS yy i MARY IEOA(AbER1 I �"' f �- I\ �p•,//j TYPE 11' 90F/ER YARD 1RACI al ADSI Np ,I 1 g� Wt1lAK JSJl.PALf]I] SITE INFORMATION SITE '�I j 1 I l n 1 Y IRA[ 9.Aafl No 911 1 NORTH - WEST - SOUTH wau•a.«Ir.r„ «, .e I:, p«,,,ax«Ir e1/«N•ru1 [nSIING l01«nC ACACIA.IURAI I \ / A.m. A.wLwlu ♦ lae.G•000 2IWu PROPO$CD TONING a CS-CONYUN//I SCRYICC • -.Yryl III i Z r I r + f lU0•YCaUY OCNSIIY RESIOEN74L J \ EAST I 1397.00' / GROSS.rA;cr=31 :.CC s5 �,e'"'' O Y- •._T!l�u...-..-.G -::.ice. ,,tir.DS'' .:'�vt'..-.....ZL-•,,�5 1 3 - -_ IOW.ILOORONE 101 AREA a.1,I,S0. !I. --R.., �� i •� �I. • 1 Ldrrs(XIS TING T`."' Mr COVER PROPDs[o Lslu.c. .. ONE o- {;a �l '/ [ 'ELEVATED STORAGC TANK O �I ! Q 1 AI INOUGN IN(RCOUIRED Ruff(RrAROS ARC SNOWM, I 1 ,/� /HEIGHT = 1651 FEET = 613 ELEV. O _ 'c, t' �-/1 • JJ OVERFLOW ELEV.= BOI I I Q O I IN(YUlICRYAROS OUt'TO El 1ENSIY[MLL LCOVER IREO � j / [ /U. 11I --RASE ELEV,= 630 1 Q Q YARr 1[OA OL6fR7 9. _ ..._____ E/�/1 .12tuuf JPJl,PAVE]I] / / y / 9 I I L 1 I 1 TRACT I mist Pal .,_ ', /._..•\) 1 Q w awlr e(Yplxl APPLICANT R(OULSIS A WAIVER 0!IML RLOUIM(O LANDSCAPE ANEA •*7;1< L1� / 1 0 \ ) VI W DN..c•AUNuruul AND PLANTINGS ODE 10 CXIfNSIYE INT COVER /\I i 1t(E 011o ♦ I brr Of SOU Ilk AXE t 1/ ! 1 / LC \ -_ _` 1RAC ANS IBOON SNptl 99i /j N VICINITY MAP l0 T [ -_♦,i\ lY taw.(1•01 KL0000u .W 1 0 gl� % m • _ //^^,]� rc4 11�•T• \,% 2-I4' co GATES° yo 16 W `I E PVOYEMIY OCSCPIPIION I {� • E: a <At 1_ o • ♦ • S Beginning a In..solo.<d<o.n.r el a Nacl of mnel�cr,.•a la June Ion. and.II•.uIa �t =C I yn•. PROYUSfO I Jan G.•ea•nua lay 1••0•r Ya•I el r•c•.e I.Volume ISS.Pa9• 178. [Foal N•<ala•, (; N I-16 GATES I 3 O po•man'caunl,1•,al •aid spa" aa•00.lnp me caurn.<•l<0r. el a upc.•1 Iene•r ] V u� I 0 4 / GRAPHIC SCALE I .e0 la 1•Gry or ieulmaNe r.ce. a in Beau 9]-:605a.nO••0 M•c•rd•.o•nron 1 1� Count I••o•: ROSS CII �� �U] zY L" �'�I ) • 00 Y. Nor., tern.., I z 1 , 7 I : 17 M !HENCE p aLlpn<.al U/.11 LaI 1•a Paint r«acorn.. ... -////// / n^ S C� I(• a I, IPSTOR 1 7 'I-.rvrl co I/ IIIJII oz IT .iYiit� I STORY 4 I INCMC[ Ea•1,a a1<lan<•e1 397.00 leel I••;rein.ler a n T.M.'Ong Reed: u< II P TI WAIIJ THENCE S 06 00'00-W.•Nelal.*el 100.00 le•1.to•point ler e _ '� C' CREi BUILDING' ai \ CI u 'Agri '. r AS I QR 4. I THENCE S 21 00'00•M.p•I•ran<•of 300.00 leer,to o point lee o<wn•r, • C-'��'� \ Y I THENCE S 13 00'00�M.a dl•r•nce el 1J.10 Teel.ro a paint Ier ITT I 1 Py� I �i 6✓I♦-. �0_' I I 1 / r I I THENCE S 11 SR'•I-M.••alence of 297.70 Teel,la•point ler a cern•I in I.w. I�1 (- L7 • I Rlna Read: 99��.yy L ROPOSED t b101 1 CS W C g I T E 1 I • • I THENCE w'N,to'^dlQ enu al I47.70 bet,ro the PdNI Of aC01«NIMc,and F"1 Q �;I� RANSYISSI• Q on AS Dore•al land,flume I i 1% TOP ELEVATIO - .1 ,I‘A9 ! ' • °r7 e'a••. �� J a ((� GROUND EICVAT eNa •�y 646 N I _ t 1J II "1 Q 0 131 l ti i `� (In III i I , I I city121N o conTosaR-r6 ti `JIJ = t 1 CRY 0/SOVOU. 0 c002 1W1.A 967 M.CA0ROLJ. AV LNUt 1901 1.IAYAa BLVD.011 t06 / 13'00'0p"W 9ovrNlAta,TEXAS 100Yi ARUNOTON,Taw T6011 �. I 1 'I 43 40' (61T)1a1-S061 (617)000-09N = G�1�1 �! 1 1 I a 1 ' ---- - CONTACT:GORDON JotlMa <) „fin .A/1If.05(5 AP,BULLAN XWES ANO[LXA DANS 11111- 1r L J II I I - 1 . -)I TRACT I6. lOSI Na 971 1 b-i 0 f - ti.o\'Ot l•/ I p E ( 1 V KaWE/J1.PAC(16 ' Z. Li ..1 1 1 I Lida wau0 NNsln ctwwrwl / 11 `\ ; It , I (wwc••uCwlupu \ 9PPR0VL0 ay nit PId4MIN0 A ZONING 6 \ � I U. } COMMISSION T\ PROPOSED_ \ \\ . r r ` NM. f 2-U' GATE L. \\� / n I \b, cRmR.M: 1r- TO SNAOY 01 KS Cr. [III n \ \`\ /TI .. I ry (Ni I 20 - P91 99c6nur: C 1 ♦i \ ' UMW 7OHNSrAV APPROVED IV TN!CITY COUNCIL ! WLUY!JI0 PAC(/9] i ;Is j .� I♦\ T I RAti t4 Atlsl No..4400, �rli•L p•n` i 1 Y _ 1 a lu�!Om.••A[MUIe•u MAU. < / i t I ; CO E S 1t ! LAWS[X/5�r I I. CRY MARA•V. - x , �� a CONCEPT PLAN FOR CS ZONING REQUEST .-. • I :; I CITY Or 50U1NLALt .�.r P.O.B\. .R,� r 00( • ,.,n,. _Il "7 3S AID+ANc(N,+K. ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK ItISIII•DI No YID rrito WEST 187.Z0' 7 L",•' --" t °'« OLNTOM COUNTY I ` IN.1,.. RADIO TRANSMISSION TOWER SERVICE BUILDING e/ / U L 21 [nil IMITOM APPRAISAL ONT.T' OMI IIAD E.I ADORE ADM..41.pn0 OANDA4 C/ALA'W(AUX LIVING IRUSI RECD1[ING•�%[uLa Y•u LW`lYM OVLMrY MI[�,V•e[a NYL5 U NAN/NL ANO Mb( I MLVA 96-WIa11t)DE 0 11.1RECORDS JUL 2 1 1997 n Uf'NNI r c' NI01 / INACI I,Atl51 w,a µ]A6 •6. IN a [aw Ni(AW l,Jl..`5 011 / 14 II}II< rut I Let J -,. / INAGI t, tl$1 N SOD 1ax.+a• wNC U NOOUL A/�OS CI. / 1 ro,..c.'0 rII.a.n„ / • I lOOt. I.n cu.NO.u R_M. a ..1Le d .. City of Southlake,Texas 111 STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-086 PROJECT: Revised Concept Plan/Southlake Woods and Stonebury STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Concept Plan for Southlake Woods and Stonebury, on property legally described as being approximately 73.9846 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, being Tracts 2A4, 2A5, and a portion of 2A2;the T.J. Thompson Survey,Abstract No. 1502,being Tracts 1 D,2,2A2, 2A3 and 2B; and being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. LOCATION: North of Continental Boulevard, west of Peytonville Avenue, east of Davis Boulevard, and south of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNER: Toll Brothers, Inc. APPLICANT: Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. •URRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirty-seven (37) RESPONSES: Four (4) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Lori Livingston, 2020 West Continental Blvd, Southlake, opposed. "Any changes that would affect the current plans and stipulations previously made. Especially if any of the changes are to be made adjacent to my property. I plan to attend the P and Z meeting so I can get a clearer view of the changes requested. • Harry Gilliand, 624 Merrill Dr., Southlake, undecided. "No details included with notice. I will attend P&Z meeting on 7/17/97. Enclosed map is too fuzzy to discern." • Albertson's Inc., Robert Rissing, Senior Real Estate Manager, 7580 Oak Grove Road, Fort Worth, TX, in favor. "It is complimentary to the adjacent use and beneficial to the city and our store!" • Don Reukema, 908 Shadywood Dr., Southlake, undecided. • "My wife and I both have master degree and neither of us has a clue as to what you are asking us to approve or oppose. There must be a better way than this." flu -1 City of Southlake,Texas P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (6-0-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary !' No. 1 dated July 11, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated July 11, 1997,with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-086CP.WPD • • 1 1 T < 1 11 -A 1 _ ‘ , ..i 1si 1 C`, IRi,...,„ 1 • L 1 Eirik kir arab TRACT MAP jj \ ral- 4"'6/118/44981/ 0•5•., f \ i 1 i ---1 socep atoll •-• e v. iff41/40ev0 Alit At 4110Will iltiatiet qi 11.11V1•170PV41 4%4& : - e=ig -mftlillell .211"" till fiAlli Aida, .11111WOMPP : :41-1 IN :ell - -74.*.-l'illnwimmyrril:IMIH- �a A ANINIE► ., / -�s - ESt. ; - F;07.4 � *-•• W _IEST 9171Ma ME la Nin ,. ' P 01 suimitrow 1 . i ki*& ...64/ do aulliamp10 • I'. il ir 111 MI NO *IP*** *toff; r- - 44 4 li 4.416% Ot 11°64 . 4. / CARRCU- 116.0.71VAdirmi 210411.1•444r-11A-Agiql 10 vitiwylli malkViffili111111.4*/ ... .403140-11: wkiv ililimunlatat0" 42044 kligitlige 1111111L111"1"."1 - -14t-il 0 Li urgle. VMS TAO iel ■'.1.1 .1amis ..�i � s —1 4 � �i ■RTs nAvA- i 1 1 ' .e, - ( - ,.. m!. 4 tillw* a ow alum lik*MO ta,f5.• " qrakillilmiwiliodoalv -- ' k`�i �=� JIM* .;fir►���.■:■I■■�1:. � 0 II P24 \ , Ill tit.r. — N EMI mMill m_jljmV4Aite 1_ mm in ,--- cctimt Th, _f �: , , ■ ,-, caP-11 ..-~c. EIBENTan �.fir �, NW �, „ • —C-2 r I 5. Mil illr C-3 C-2 r AG MI 44°' I 2- 1,..2_4!1 1 HIGH ,±) r, . : : .‘i . , •� S_ 1 It_ -C-3 - •Cr:-/q3 MM.! Actillti4lie: A-It -. 10472,,„5.4 Fummiriki- • al ti, ,Win,_,7 SF-20A RE 1 ID sra;Wi • f1 :•�-:«^IT� •::BSI P A G7 ri • , c;Ck° \ 13 _ 5 _ AMIE SF-1A i t ' !! 3 * ?1 /Z p0 i5 = • AG I n 11,,3,. L ; hiniiiii_ rill 0 18 1 .1 1 II■ - . q ./ !Q ; lilt* III ?.P.N-141N- 1-1 - za i• ...1;1111 Pno illtergeAla wtiiiiillp -wcaeal inil rill V) ." 1 l'ami v max. ilil tadatomli. i .,, ,,...„.N....„ , ::_ir AGN �-� MI_ riff kink ; 111 2, __. c, coal SF-20A ELDIENTARY SCHOC1 _ CS .1 A O ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING SPIN #14 DOUG MCKELVEY SPIN 415 WAYN.E AND JUNE HANEY —]1—) — 2-1 • ADJACENT LAND OWNERS 10-Jul-97 Owner Name 1 GOODE, ROBERT G TR 2 W&B KIDD FAMILY LTD PRNTSHP 3 AKARD,CHARLES ETUX RENA 4 AKARD,LARRY W 5 LAMAR,C&WANDA J MAY 6 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 7 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 8 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 10 BAKER,CHARLOTTE K&BRANDO 11 BAKER, BRANDON ETUX CHARLO 12 FOSTER,CHARLES M 13 LEASE,MICHAEL H ETUX PATRIC! 14 GOODE, ROBERT G TR 15 GOODE,ROBERT G TR 16 GOODE, ROBERT G TR 17 GOODE, ROBERT G TR 18 GOODE, ROBERT G TR 19 HARRELL,BOBBY ETUX CONNIE B 20 FAULKNER,MIKEL ETUX SANDRA 21• GOODE,ROBERT G TR 22 23 CARROLL ISD, COUNTRY WALK LTD PRTNSHP, 24 HEATHERWOOD CUSTOM HOMES 25 COUNTRY WALK LTD PRTNSHP, 26 GILLIAND,HARRY E 27 GLOBESTAR INC, 28 GIFFIN,JAMES W 29 GIFFIN,JAMES W 30 STANLEY JORDAN 31 PATSY CALHOUN 32 COUCH, RUTH 33 COUCH,JERRY WALTER 34 COSGROVE,MICHAEL P 36 COSGROVE, BERNARD P 37 SHEEHEY, F ROSETTA 38 STATE OF TEXAS 39 COSGROVE, BERNARD P 40 COLLINS,OTTIS F 41 VENUS PARTNERS III, 42 ALBERTSON'S INC, 43 SOUTHLAKE JV, • 0 • . • . «, WI l }.. . '1'L �... M.,.,t°a. :: AA o F ?worn S e 1--- ' .qa.., i .. R��/t ...... ,:. Stc).1 1 T F.M. NO. 1938 " • ire"""` (OA4t5-BNOT- ,r. I. ara. uu ' oi, 111115!"......," LI �,.�,.. .ar4r. �... «.a...� a I xoc 111100, SITE coppMOM.ca 174 .(n ' ) .a.cr. urc,�,t, p°tr I I � A LOCAT ION MAP w Parcr. �ooA«� i ]p ]I , i•1G�•W F. ,n ,• a pair!Cm« L' ]1 a �-� 1 _ «— wtZ • T p 4 (I. i i Co la li 2114\411 N 'IP Wil IWO..P .." 1 . I . ."AS:SY eorsk" ,,..„ .•-„ MN.al.I.J1 .LOCO V-In pis ;: `M «,Ile w m" • u, �►► Vii01 ;���,,��\� 1�� It• , zleialliilaill* We UK a. 1411 aDWI Gal .LY AM i r0411111N,//.�?`... Wiftiorn ,la._., . PP "51 l ip i no-- ..,...... � rithibb.... ...,-3.,,,,..,..,,,,,, ,-,...,,,,,r-r), ..r.r.:7-'.-...s.> Allifl • '' ,, alia Ilii 1 MI ...rign. , "vs 1 41 ti !:iii'i. �/i 6F s i^ Tg\ �C �� a.19 J' ii�� i .1 9. 4d C n II -w a.+ ..2r- ill 111Jw�. — i ) POD IN. ..1 'r:.• P"iu .., ,1 -74:r11.7i V [1. , „...,....„.. ,...-.. i i :-., i t ,,,„,,,4 5 cl_ • 11 ',J1:1-;:':'::',"'I—F'''I"'L II r b,m r.1 • " `II./.„�• ta441 L 114-'' `.r " . . 1"� SF-20A ZONING REQUEST `• I `. . .•. « — ��—,r*"■'.r' 4.,,p. .. __� r SOUTHLAKE WOODS • �_- ®g ..,,ate„ , PEY(CONVILLE AVENUE i ' L _ (COUNTYNV ROAD AV AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRFARE ESTATES mom ���"` q • �.11 r A AN ADDITION TO THE CO COUNTY,OF souTawce. 4"f~�'j"� r.r . "'p III- ' i0'� 2 ° 1• ,. AS RECORDETARD IN VOL 8-123ASPAGE 99 E. THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS (n �\ J J „o ..•o.wLWc , ' ' SEP C 9 1996 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL O .ru r �j"... 1- EXISTING ZONING 111 1 / I I i I AGRICULTURAL - AG a I IIL�Lr1L'11�/..L ) COYYERCUL - C-3 urmc rD*TM Iaa I`V I.1 SINGLE-FAMILY - SF-IA �� ar.a i - — LU.D. DESIGNATION : '''.-------:— ..o.r o.1,m, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A moor a moos 128 LOTS (11.22 D.U./ACRE) A � a� ,R.MM.=R1 105.26 ACRES OUT OF THE SPUT.•.a.M.NMI W. EAVES SURVEY. AEST. NO. 800 T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 °"a' �" CITY OF SOUTHIAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS I•T Ilm/a\WW1 fYDaf .a man m1 T• PIArm10•plGarp.11pa 3II.2CANT • �„o W.W.I.M•wwa*M.O.1.....All*OW Iro.r., o• Sao' .00• .ao• Soa' MAY..°TM/TWO NOT,rvauaT,•cT,u.a nalll.P.D.C. TOLL MOIL MC. 2 nR I v•.w,ia.Pt RM./ .IU 0P.11.4•1...u•.p. ` I .o,p•m I.Ca%m). an su.,,mu•ouT -WITS»• e0 w,•uo ouTMmXf0.TQ.f )P 1 SOILS. I' .10' 513.•TO RTI mUI.I.Ci.TQ1 1Ppq R u.0 00� .r. )a ,.,w........ a em•,.. re,r.•. •up• r.•r a ZONING CASE NO. ZA 98-81 SHEET 1 OF 2 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN _ _. .. .-..___ . _.n ... _ L . . w, • • . 0 . f I EMMIEIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 109.3E ACRES r• .I.Y l r to 4.n fw..T.T.•e ..fN•« 1.=?.'`%71ram [ Oasert N.C.: tATl�.q.• )i a Gin°Or•�MGw O•`••«r [COMt • • 'ri'N••t •' 1,: r:'e 1:•2011Tin:rr':::°•r:l •::::tr tt In:: M e:Go•M]"° �"1:Y•Ir^°Ab!i"••`IH °:•�n•w• r 'lr::.' .•• °w:•I.f:•t r Iru•:e:: !Mnr•4•y....g:z••• e,,,Y:1f:.At..2 «O:ni volume I i.. a* •r rrent Cat .I.212 ort. ' h. rote.. valN::1]0 • wea •tor a°"ei itl�l„::T.::i en .[ten .W)n1+•. 0°e:•NI •1u.�M►1t1 • t •,:,°r:rr•I .n:Iwnae ««r 1n •rs rt,tralr 1. mw 1• ••I• •.a a WI..l.e,• •n lr Ms•aahn.[<wnr•r Trott]et N .r••en,w••IMAM U0.0Z 11 X 2041Pe ".il the tor. «•r said W.l.,w["WW2,'!aids•0.t•n.•I m.°l...I.•«t.a I•t«...U. EGA., Na.: 6o 7tire::n ,.Ge err] `a i:•t t•e're;.•'w t DUANITIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE „..fl.•+.=II . •. Ti.`.d":::'::: •" ... ,wt "1,,.":r• try••,Ir.Y Worth 1�4 tD,t,f Y;•::•,7•`«1:�1Iir •wlnwr:":r«re::` ,:"tt:FaR a•tr Y•rl •.Kl«tn N•Y']1'r _ ... ]Pi . "'YUK� ..r 'Y r... 1.,= .r•m 1,OC,Itn e«1 •• [R l•r.11«lM t • ««««A •a..aiK•K. uir `9r1]•I••.. . 1]A 1�. •r• a. a/ e1Y( r.... r-.A r-des r-,A,MU Se �R4 •• Y P r _larch»:.a•0.1 • :•• 4 I �rwm....r. ., :»q 0:'::::: : .;at:;. .:1a^u.� en rllne el .tlr A«.N to•...•.Nnarr nro 11021•lens. ....rf«tn N1•'N'2.2 • rIn<l7 r« .••.ma.a u, .M..'i:e' :1;•::['.i«:1:•.ten:::Mi:n:I::::::e:1:...:I,w•i::1•`.::.e•1•ua'G••r va.[..•e[t•.«1.. it ht. y 1. .•• nac.•Ierni the tent....C..nenU1 12a10.0.faY.•.rl,•. .• ...•1........«••.for Ao•. ,R.o u.s .•.. r r ran ..1.Gof wnoo ram Iw "1NL�::s": lh.� .` ":'urrta,`ufilia':.w�°:. OD�i: n.lni.ita,:hiK.. >.«r.er•[ Y • 'e :4..:. rl•:u:n•r«1 r•:E.::ri�°N1..♦ .1,.•a :1::eer<rr i Trren C•Go..T.U .41 02.....2.42.24.02.0 r...Rpm.. f-.A In-. us rr o r.s..Y 1 .. .I.Y Ktr• 1 ] tN Z ...N tn.Y a :>; ,.:e»:>". »]:.'M'o.e:•:t:::`..G ..,"::::;.A:.Goss. ,«:.f,::.:rKrr• ••d R M. 12 11. Gov nrW 14:Of:rbrt ast•:1:I.eA'.t::1 11:21,': t . . h nel' Gorr Of••I.4•<a v • • T1e.t. 11 ::'w«er•.«.▪ :«v,rw'a•d 1:44.4:..t Ye• u:�11..•ri:isi:.w a.. z r•,i1.^.:. n I,^•• t aid r.Y'::? 4 . °a'w ms 'MT.' •m ..... r Go •..1 ` .a°i. r al.00 :wmi "r. w•t t "K:e:r:•r•.. ::Ii u. r 1 .rY.1 1... .«.a a..K.«.n a r.Y l•.04C2.I "r ..•I.e1•Cos...tr.a...th n•1r]e•.ai •.... •1«.4. ar. ..•...oww� - ........... r Y rr aid«.air. r r.r, +..nth• r r_•Go ..� ..Y..4 all ,"o`n:' '1'1r• `:r..°t::. n•.1•@«.:::4.:«r`:.,:'airurw•,.• •.•m •a I i01:.:e1:<:°° xr.. Y , 1. .24 r n.nr,n.... .•r .. • ti r raN r>�, :A, r.,m Y°::;�.: a°: '~;a .: :,,y::".: :: r.: [« . K..r]Y.N Goat yy N'»':T' :is n�.n4• r tene Or u P.O r....]mn* r-.. r-u ,.r. Yen.a . , 4 @u°U1Y. «.r•. •:Z.1•:a«i, .p:',:;a: W W.i:.:�:. 1 r.ent`cwn;. a. GrYY Y Go • Ion.1.Y.At.vo.4 I .n :TI 1 .ne[ ai•r-r.,t-...., •.•.1I.P.M.ON Or mi.Ns math end e...Ilm•.....t•111. . W u,o"°�07'1 Sir ry:a.•. Irf i.». .i`in tm« r WMAn,GOSf 1l4•NA>t :^M<rr M`It�:'::•.':: KGr•IM"lm «<•1•[:Irreer red •=1 .M... ..Oa .1 AY IA11 • . rr r. aim. .a« sT• .raili11,. a.m nr.Au• u. Y.,r Nr1T•«• r,T 11m a .w.1RA.. 1r a U • = wr r Or.. r Or.,f w,o" r Of m ` _Min .i::f: 11i:"LG"▪` •:1:: 7 r..r snow.a <-1 Gow Y- O. e.or... it 04 M W u , d :. ::a •1 l.l. [:: •r,:::::": ` , .Y .Y :••••117 '"::r Goµ ••, « .•1.s ''''''.'.:r•.F.1,1.']i.';ai ;•.«K<w:G:'•^n:::•t CONCEPT PLAN ••4 ::ilw`wI^• °v.u:'lt «. n Y n. I:..i.» 1, 1•:ware:".:•[... .Iwlp, r•.«..n. FOR In N•I i" «1 SF-20A ZONING REQUEST cxir ( ::»• �:, i«:. rr:::::Y: :;:.Got.. .... ..atn... r.r........n SOUTHLAKE WOODS ✓ 7^a..•.«•alh,1«•I:u..«LL1... Sown N7,O:'r.Y2•ai•t.N.Of ID;Y...L:•«Ia rr Oa nor...� ...ai.aiw.M ur•T.s AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRFARE ESTATES al v n.ee,.,u.h.«,u «.r««.Iww,f1.nR ]aY nvrn•,..e .«.e.«.ai]]..].«.«.A.POOP AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTRI.UCE. a.ad.1.1r•,a aen« vy Goo,.]•.tr...r 1w. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS AS RECORDED IN VOL. 366-123, PAGE 99 E. OF THE PLATTARRANT RECORDS OF COUNTY, TEXAS U.) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL O EXISTING ZONING a. AGRICULTURAL - AG COMMERCIAL - C-3 RECO SEP SINGLE-FAMILY - SF-IA 11 1996 MEDIUM DENSITY"ATION RESIDENTIAL 128 LOTS (11.22 D.U./ACRE) 0•Nm• 105.26 ACRES OUT OF THE 0 $ MGM` c T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, O EY, ABST. NO�1502 INa W1I1 G. 0 WO. ro. W. EAVES 9 ap1��'�W°•0°` CITY OF SOUTNWCE, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS irar ANY/0/saw,Y],OR, r1AMNY40 Y IRGJIm,IIE ArrILANT RDOfa..NI TA roar.aatlDar.srnn.,OrIf.A11.MC. TOLL MIL.INC. . .1Ya_An.7R]A1 TON• AM SWaWOO CYn-awn as .10 CO GAVE q Isu a.TQY 7YY Y.OMR.1T9Aa 7N'N I Oltvua0 P.CaOONR R w•I_.Lae..,err,tr-r. ra tit.Ir-.r••u WO•.drdY su DAM OLIO. ,Goo.MAY Fla,..Y. s1um.Rc mu 1101` ZONING CASE NO. ZA 96-01 SHEET 2 OF 2 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY liase No: ZA 97-086 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Revised Concept Plan - Southlake Woods and Stonebury, 97 Acres±, in the W. R. Eaves Survey Abst. #500 and the T.J. Thompson Survey Abst. #1502 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Toll Bros., Inc. Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. 4010 Eider Drive 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200 McKinney, Texas 75070 Plano, Texas 75093 Phone : (214) 562-8655 Phone : (972) 931-0694 Fax : (214) 542-0245 Attn.: Elvio Bruni Fax : (972) 931-9538 Attn.: Lynn Meyer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. * With the exception of a few comments which address the entirety of the development, this review is limited to the areas actually changed by this submittal. All other areas are still subject to stipulations as approved with the previous Concept Plan by City Council. The areas of change include: Southlake Woods Block 1 -Lots 34-43,Block 5,Block 6 -Lots 16-20 and Stonebury Addition Block 1 -Lot 13, • Block 2 - Lots 8-13. 1. Correct the total number of lots shown for Stonebury to 35 (32 res. lots and 3 common areas). 2. Change the acreage shown in the title block for both Southlake Woods and Stonebury to reflect the area taken from Southlake Woods and added to Stonebury. * The Amenity Center which was to be located on Lot 1, Block 1 of Southlake Woods is now to be located on a newly created Common Area, Lot 9R, Block 2 of Stonebury Addition. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. Toll Bros., Inc. L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97086CP2.WPD • `71-I- � 0 • • • , --fil P\ e..DNro if'edl slo l F.Af. N0. 1938 — — ® i 7DASS 6LW). w"23, ..b 74MSF yw 0222.2. 1 OPEN)PA0(12 CE A SITE .rc,• M".N.Nr. I •AIc1 •g'� Q COUOPEm051.SPECS ESu 1.110 12G JOG ,D...�a N r I{$ L) LOCATION NAP ttN I \ 1 ' l •'c e,lw'CN. Tel....., •,.... . 222.4 R GI . ••,c,. iw . . Rau? ••rc' l 1 lm. ••' ♦ •tr. NA L I )2 r B Lw ',�a,^ dit uve.n.Pu„'N co o' xe 10 M 'r , 2' to 2x �+� rap 0 ��� HOLLOW\ iff 'a A :M1tlN M`Yut • \NONE rsuc.LENE ce..... #0. �I 00, ::it, ifii, ..,.. ..w4-- ........... 4. M' 'on'eayK'„' 22 I � . Ell 1f' '-OA!.49 212.12. cae .;"SsW^'.illy real'�' o.'..w.+, / J`\ ] .'e .,r, =µ ill' • I"l°1 "� ��16 5. N 'I rN .,o.a,r J • .o0:,0.1. K �..`.a�o,cr 2° r ��l lT'2 II1 - e *^�L°cn•' N,,y� *Mt? • `` •i - ` �..., ., - -�-- -- - 'P SE 1. ca i „, --'-'-�-- 19 ;��.'41 1 I 2.1 o .�y L° •I ,ar +^,rcG: �d • ) \ J B 9 10 Ix ) I! ,1 INDIIN PAlIyiBNU]N WAY .END BLOCK 1 + LOT 9N,BLOCK 'O o.x � —Ey--•t1;B•. Nr -�, WNe,N CY w COMMON AREA NO B �J Weer AMENITY CENTER 441111111 _ _— I �� i \ ) ��— BE MAINTAINED.•- DM HOLLOW BLVD. g ��� '� L ., 10 I �111141111111k THE NO.A. 0 PWL".e".3.� 11 ccu N' YI r xl1 , G. 7q '���4� I' j'''�`�A I• v ♦ �24�`L II �)• 1 �^'VC ae�•: . • :. f T-•.r'-�l'\- ra ocers X .'..m,er 8 '. • '� .a a r ,,, �N Ar �\y_-Mi ,.J e. 11 ooliii ISF _ f E ..2, e ' ;lk ;"5."16•. `�TryJoiN • By)6c1L.6 ;w ja A e . z1:-.i lit 2..0_,‘ ) Iri IliL •,' o C I Lti r'1 _ } 1 +q<u.o /w P+. ' (, ��ll • 9UCW°2. • � •FI''' ' I ( • }` A�Ja. Jr) '. �� © , REVVED CUNCEYT PLAN n i�. -... i L If,- J•' FOR M �- STONEBURY PLAT AND. • "��. ,,. ,u �++.s •fc MIN' .�.' —z r..T,=— ' SOUTHLAKE WOODS W PEYTONVILLE AVENUE 5 AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES ' A N' e`: -• W �Z re, • , (COUNTY NwD JOeB) I _ I —Io.a W 3I AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. 6..I ' W ':neon'., -• s-lo, e y ` N - TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS I o N.o AA.v W re. u. IIN 1 l °C, ! •cl OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT-13 COUNTY,E TEXAS • 9 r•.., n �j 4•«• , • .Wa' p» STONEBURY FIO u a /, Ic �,i`;K , I I I ! 7?SF LOTS 1 HOA LOT 23.16 ACRES OUT OF THE Wit.EAVES SURVEY ABS. —APPROL BUSTING TNBB UN! NO.500 '• ru+• _ SOUTHLAKE WOODS .."-----ow. - 129 SF LOTS 6 IIO A LOTS q,-0t+�]6+ 105.20 ACRES OUT OF THE RE W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 r'.L1/U JUL 21 1997 CI T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY. ABST. NO. 1502 ...tn.0` - ( l.�`- TY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 550115 PLLNNOIG A 1NGWEBIIISIc. APPISCAI S•oWXn I)Na Wrr2910201..B l0ME0 N.C.1 PI5162411 POW IOW AO•) U• 200• 400' Boo' 300• mu MA.,INC. l 2212(B W0221e7200-.'V.IX.AEQM10 02020 CON10.021.KW 0 .0.'I DOWDEY;ANDEN]OrIAASSOLIAR].INC. NIO MUDIIM x P.u..urvN.IW.c,Uw.,a N...O..e )ll)VILLNGB CAABL DIUVL BUrTB IN IO WPNIN[Y.TM.TAM SCALE r .200' PEANO.TLIW 1NNl u •e.•.•Fal�ul..•-Nw PM PIANO.m2)011dtu IAA CONCEPT PLAN CASE n0 ZA9J-1J SHEET I OF 2 ANL 1997 97495 BE,117.I."1 City of Southlake,Texas SSTAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-087 PROJECT: Revised Preliminary Plat/Southlake Woods and Stonebury STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Preliminary Plat for Southlake Woods and Stonebury, being legally described as 113.04 Acres being Tracts 2A4, 2A5 and 2A2 in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; Tracts 1 D, 2, 2A, 2A2, 2A3 and 2B, T.J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502; a Plat Revision of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Airpark Estates, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 99, P.R.T.C.T.; and being 23.1641 acres known as Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. LOCATION: North of Continental Boulevard, west of Peytonville Avenue, east of Davis Boulevard, and south of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). 11, OWNER: Toll Brothers, Inc. APPLICANT: Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fifty-three (53) RESPONSES: Five (5) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Lori Livingston, 2020 W. Continental Blvd., Southlake. Any changes that would affect the current plans and stipulations previously made. Especially, if any of the changes are to be made adjacent to my property. I plan to attend the P and Z meeting so I can get a clearer view of the changes requested. • Harry Gilliand, 624 Merrill Dr., Southlake, undecided. "No details included w/ notice and enclosed map too fuzzy to read. Will attend meeting on 7/17. • Ruth Couch, 603 Davis Blvd., Southlake, in favor. 0 • Don Reukema, 908 Shadywood Dr., Southlake, undecided. "My wife and I both have master degree and City of Southlake,Texas • neither of us has a clue as to what you are asking us to approve or oppose." • Bobby Harrell, 920 S Peytonville Ave, Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (6-0-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997, with the following amendment: 1) delete requirement # 11 (35' building setback line is required along both street frontages for corner lots zoned SF20A). STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-087PP.WPD S 7,&i.wilLo__7. ' ---l :7 ti4ft Nr1A..11 1 ill I ' swoo) / -Th 1 ..... ,,- -,f.-ris- 40411.,,t4 Atwel Awl t t in __.____ • illTRACT MAP �,� ��� 40 ilaiiiiiiiiiii•pat IIV4 .I 1 i MI . goo 0 siv .mu arrits 1 Egi !Bp_g__Nat__ ,..0.0, . 0 .. ...„ i - fl*A. r ' IA Pali irmaz losu.0- 0 1 at --; ok _eacisimit .-•-st , .■�■ lt artilli ,, '-k- - III iiiWia1KieIIiE:51 IN .: i, stimi.impi P lir a Ijth in ,1 .4 iiiiir ...dalIS*rn 11,xiverotip.���� ■■ emu. �,\��j����� ��j�'�� o, 1 ,4:. •—r .,1411,11. . Itri..40. nap Noffividaywagair 4010.40011144 .0 411 friak.. taltil momlilime**10/4141111110 1 mi lig I -11P1 A 7vitall'ItElilli14:7444•414., 1 I TAM' lifff L 4 A E-4tkIES iiiiiiitSilleaRier. it:Mr- 111 Pr Orr Mr' Mit= grilq,,,: - Bilig=i&.‘VT 9/.-- ii ■ wiri -,. , Ai iimpiterposentekt :- AIM . toryin-swimpromwo -11111/mv-soF:Ahtwoorovwomivar 1 dr5111 EPPIr 4 Am . .r m ����.:41INVAttrt ..tomersisminopottati , , .,. \_ ihtraiireakivr A Mitittftlirtiltralik - '' 111 IN • II I'M C--riMilmi rograi mai : r: L, 11111,4 -- , isi f.p111' rail ti „ citaKIL ARy .a wegirmr. al A _ 1rIIStca % i tr":- ' :� �►. _fn�Tha - .,„•-• 4M111 vv. 0 i ;Eh imINFORIN ' a -fir •� fig A G 7 . Ng iM lig%I..&16" 1411' 111 NI _I_ 1 gip mit ---- S. puwwwww OP" AG 511 c a &L, pl ,t0 11j H. 0 i .. C-3 • -F 00•• 1Itp 93-1X. R1O110W I. C-3 ' 10-4 / 7 " IL aa4 ! ma !fir. atoom ��� r ‘ISmomyilir.: ---1 401 ** - 51 mt.:4v;4 S-P ks0 .4 .41..-. AGIPARATP p !4L2A %R E 1I ' i1., 1r Opt ta dirdSF-1A �', �� I L S F-1 A m.�n�/m 43 ri patillwil • R E iq 1ir - SF-20A r zo in A G 14 0 .1 -till 3.4ii Ad. RlEilimi,içi4ii pSF-1 £ s 'I ' S VIM- IPIINPIbillrl.' - ..: %BOO : ® '' A Frilir., 53 " li •�ft SF-20A II' will MEM llivAr %Ilea hosi*Ido ro A marl" MIL till I 36 iti .41 z9 rm. i / RE MI NM 3zi lr ECLL i r :mpg, = is ri ll i SQ-10C�. ■ ii at met• Cmila . i Q * ADJACENT LAND OWNERS • 11-Jul-97 # Owner Name 1 LIU, BENNET 2 LIU, BENNET 3 W&B KIDD FAMILY LTD PRNTSHP, 4 AKARD,CHARLES ETUX RENA 5 AKARD, LARRY W 6 LAMAR,C&WANDA J MAY 7 CARROLL ISD, 8 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 9 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 10 TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT CO, 11 BAKER, CHARLOTTE K&BRANDON 12 BAKER, BRANDON ETUX CHARLOTTE 14 FOSTER,CHARLES M 15 LEASE, MICHAEL H ETUX PATRICIA 16 MORRISON, NAOMI R 17 MORRISON, NAOMI R 18 MORRISON, NAOMI R 19 FRANCO,JOSE B 20 MUZYKA,CASIMIR ETUX VIRGINIA 21 PLUNKETT, LAWRENCE ETUX SANDRA 22 SPINKS,STEWART A ETUX SUZANNE 23 THACKER, DWIGHT ETUX CATHY 24 TARVIN,TOM ETUX GLORIA STOBBS • 25 26 REUKEMA, DONALD T ETUX MARTHA USSEGLIO,J MICHAEL ETUX KIM E 27 LAFEVERS, HOWARD ETUX VIOLA 29 CURB, BILLY JOHN 30 BENBOW, DANIEL T ETUX ANNETTE 31 CARROLL ISD, 32 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 33 HEATHERWOOD CUSTOM HOMES 34 COUNTRY WALK LTD PRTNSHP, 35 GILLIAND, HARRY E 36 GLOBESTAR INC, 37 GIFFIN,JAMES W 38 GIFFIN,JAMES W 39 STANLEY JORDAN 40 PATSY CALHOUN 41 COUCH, RUTH 42 COUCH,JERRY WALTER 43 COSGROVE, BERNARD P 44 SHEEHEY, F ROSETTA 45 COSGROVE, MICHAEL P 46 TEXAS,STATE OF 47 COSGROVE,MICHAEL P 48 COLLINS,OTTIS F 49 VENUS PARTNERS III, 50 ALBERTSON'S INC, 51 SOUTHLAKE JV, • 52 53 HARRELL, BOBBY ETUX CONNIE B FAULKNER, MIKEL ETUX SANDRA 1 • ak [ MATCH LINE --~ +••'+... SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 t.L.-7==r. , ,....- ----7-7 1 e,_„___________4 Ir.. -' ,- .... 1.1. '.-.1.„. 1 . . • 'r. .,«• P ASS P.' --- 5 .c. • _I Ix . LT• BLOCI( ,,_�, iw,y, •]. IA ►f 'f 3 Im l c^°"" 0' W. ZOO' .300' 400' e Y BLOCK 1 3 � 1 • �I I' sl"'n [_ ,,,...v,• •o.. �� _ a _-_ 'I • o�c' 1y s.l,. ..,n :Gout: ,- . ,BB• .�.,� SITE/I ,� —� / ' ,. '. l OR.�o 1W / l na,.7.,••r too. [ !•r ,10 p11 ` �r ' y' �� .00K_. _ �1 \ I ' /X L,.y. 1. to t:au cov4 _ t —,- .�_— «, _ LOCATION MAP 1 ♦ A' \L r]sue ^.L d — I /1// I ! H A F e 1�_ i I I c' ""';: y o �r A l a /A E It - I ___ (—._� i ! e ' R le � ' 73� } mc... I MOM resent, 1. • �� '� '1 . fit / a A.I.. —ill o I ,m I !. I .-• I1 I1--_— Q Y BLOCK x i i •.•c•. 1 I 1—-- 1 —. 7 - .. II _� `_ el I e: I^ le r•iS snalzc :.Ir I I ro[rs: ° 11 r`",,, y 1 .I Y cl H .erl.. J1e +esir]:[ zaaarI ti orot ]w.or 'C C4 ( _____ -CI os 1,7�. r, __ "`c—C '' } M ► — a. SW_F. _T. .w ww n•«aw n,ano.,c. .... u a eI��►oil. ,....�,.•LJ.�F a TK x u. �; ,A '..".w'a,... W C` 'R eI a ....... {J [_ _ ., DA IND•ml..DV"41.„m104 �n o wwa n.ww ...... a" 11.., ;" M • ;ice 1... ;h M '� _• ,z ` " Z I ) . 141�w1ld .4... ... ..n..o....«... ^ LOT 1 I ! 4 . • ;� '\ ~••• ITECPINC 1I1LLOW BAY i L f 10 ' ' "4I I 0 BLOCK 1 ]I .� B « (a0'ILO...'VI• .w.. 1 r, I ..v, I In COuup1 MU 1 •.P ' TO BE 4NMNNEO BY H.OA BLOCK 1/ a.... �`kliollim--1, .0'�" nv OK �•� •; � 1•A I■I I 11■ W Ia.•+ Q 0 ; ° ] ' ..I.. BLOCK 2•` \ ��L �=,;�xl:,• ^1 . .. " Loa 4 M — • — .r , : ID 011' ...�. SEP p 9 1996 U LOT rl 1J / /Y '1 .,-.'K"� .o �`^COU/BfO B N OAi' _ ? ��.�` o ����... .M .. PRELIMINARY PLAT � _---�.— 3� SOUTHLAKE WOODS o I BEING A REVISION OF TRACTS 3-7. AIRPARA ESTATES 0, + ; n.r.«.m 6',.. .Ii rl CONTINENTAL BOULEVARDTO THE"-1 N AN ADDITION VOL. 9BC125, PC. 99.1 D.R�T.0 CO., TX. —Lk il -20A w \ l+ ` r w I a I I - �: PROPOSED SFEASE ZONING B • 120 RESIDENTIAL LOTS • 1 ACCESS EASEMENT us '7 I COMMERCIAL LOT I \ / A �I, I �+�, I 31 I —— °t�R'' 113.04 ACRES OUT OP THE -ti. TnDm G.coofa Y, ,.� ovrvan n W. EAVES SURVEY. ABSC. NO. 500 T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 .... CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS z 'rr • m""'"a:- Lk 1 0 04./ae nu.a.aaan _ £ 1 • BOoao 4.DOa nA DADTM•G•eK<w.n..c01,11.4.14 NOTE: NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL LOT WITHIN THIS S —� 1 am..A..1..-.aa.•• rorr,locum,a nn.Bunco.,n<. T.0 Mi.CPC- 1 SUBDIVISION ON TO SOUTHLA4(E BLVD. (F.M. 1709). DAVIS BLVD. (F.M. 1938). CONTINEN1IAL 1 --11 yy I "gm fmnwma fun-'vat m ulo e[on Dan BLVD. OR PEYTONVILLE AVE. I 16 I toN4 13 P.MICRO'S AL .wa.a•rnAe 1O+ff K.ID.Kar,nSAf rfsn w0•r.r.0 010 rr n In.w+r•.0.w.wy« . ae mm an. ,• a...rwn.raga r4af a�..,.« ,........... �,•...•. CASE NO. 2A 96-80 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ; > ` . ' . .0 4 Ix'` ' e 4 * 4 °� �" `Tjr d s.i Y �'t - ax" .a s` is t 't! z •�< MATCH LINE �! —a"'.^"" SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 '- 1o°laxrr u�l'.�1,��rL� —f -BLOCK 8-� }� ,r�..-' 0. .0. =e\ filL21-7 CM3 I`iK-vrxeai r xxx..0• ,r ��. ! rb�r f I —,-,1CW...J I �� � ,.uc'�x"I n BaBmBoY i oswa I,l. r I •r Vf` __ I I I , } ,a • n L.:001 I G 71 • , ! s ? n `]P L R y 'M "' J t. ,l� r .de....r. E. I I 30 f 7A1 B. i iL BLOCX. 1— a«a s __ s' '_i A?i ^ I ='—' •wre\ - 21 41 ' nr 1 ` COUNTRY BM 111Y fir. . w ! ' , IUo•i.0.ra7 1I{`1 .. AL 0 Mil , ^mow 1....oa t ,-w .. it 10 1! 1 ' 39 �e0 is awn • a. - x� r°i d .'=".'".* ,r cta eta,�loy.1 '0"4 r-4.K. F%'.1. .a,. ,r I ayli_. __'_ = - �.zs:__ ; 1 { P. .. POINT OF r ,..i.— - ��+ . •.: f G: BLOCK 3 1,�.' ss..� ` e1 1 /BEGINNING .r8' LI ...<r. ,_, n �9 rxlra o.<cvARC°/' i. \ • l rots 1 � rn 1r^�p lao•0a YI) .1 I 25 O f s rill) ---_ � • 9 ` i ___ _ en ; di < • u.1 3 s d ! 23 ! 22 ! x1 ! 20 �°^ 2 i e• / aR aoLmay \ y/ _ _ •n ..... j1 BLOCK 1 • 1 w•..o.IO \ Y v 5o 05 n•'nl.•)• { tw S i - ' I11.11 al. Lge..'''. • si f s d. • i le I i ��7 t e xf -"Cr .:.:\ t$ s �r l Rx \ Sg9 1 j • t R BLOCK 7 t, �Ia]i1�J• yy�i���� xl i' \ £:L2JWI aS 'O. } •, a s w o 4 .J 3 �,�' -Li? ,I a��L °� • :u6ti9e,Hy:''1• COURrN MATCH LINE PRELIMINARY PLAT SEE SHEET 1 OF 4 SOUTHLAKE WOODS BEING A REVISION OP TRACTS 0-7• AIRFARE ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OP SOOTHLSXE•TARANT CO.,TX VOL ]98-12J, PG- 99, D.R.T.C.T. PROPOSED SF-20A ZONING 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS o• roo• 200 xoo• .00• NOTE: NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL LOT WITHIN THIS °'""" I ACCESS EASEMENT *--11.-6.......1 SUBDIVISION ON TO SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709)• DAVIS BLVD. (F.M. 1938). CONTINENTIAL " 'C.Ga00e I COMMERCIAL LOT BLVD. OR PEYTONVILLE AVE. f^ so°0ivni:¢I mom.a 211.9«an Suu: i . 100• j LIVES ACRES OUT OP THE 4. EAVES SURVEY• ABST. NO. 500 ri T•Ne/0e.oar 1ae99ZT T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY• ABST. NO. 1502 • , t01^a••9oa a'• CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS 1996 audul•m.e yaw. nI� _ roar.Flucus.541::p 41.10 .NC. YOUINC. .a .1 f.CpC.O.I r it . DAM 9Lr9. ••N MOW.. -=I1T9 9.. .OCOI Y"r9 ]oVM.lx.m.11.... - D�YTiLf llL1 Y.� mI.1e'y CASE NO. 2A 98-80 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT I a , , . :,w»„,.< �`+'5., tii� ,' " .., a.kf y -�. ? ',H ± .,rc�. -..w 9•��:s.iv'•i ur - • yy r� • ` Z ` j \ cs%V 4 4 \ / ar1 A \ / Fa0 (.4 `s ♦ .4,,aiP[yrli l ite'i d` k �• \ / N l PHASE MAP GI / 1'. E. \ / V ui I \ / �aV. I OUANITIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE A I ..... "" // "�/ -,. ems Paz .... / u:�[ '.s 33.41 I \ .1,A[ .AXelk o F Tt eorosEv 1'/ \ / ".. j 1ZEVt5 ink) ,a.. ,...arcr LAM o>�„ _7 .,.� CI Kw. /• / / ' LOTBLOCK S - 9.).•CA6 .f z / \ \ I � L_ «.. .« .� - \ .fs,...___ __p r 7—,\..........i--=-_= n Dana ...Kw. ...•••• ....... res ra••••• "'A..." ra or moo \z'\ \ .....,... , .1, ;\ 1 ),,, MAI MOOT >' \ J.�AY i ! — �' w • ,a..OWL. ,... 1.....M. ..Amow w.1a 41 • �i, y 31 i: .:Y .b m e«. o r. ............ ,,,,,,,.././..,......... , i :\ b . ,,,, .I- ,, I 1 " I ....acr.cam 1.74 • • at: ..1.. /�•��'s. �� t: .e ` sy I e r Cp r PRELIMINARY PLAT I� SOUTHLAKE WOODS QO. --- �,1°i iY[ i "r s \'': -; , • .... I^- BEINGAREVISION OPTRACTS9-7, AD2PARKESTATESKo �`I S p 1996ANADDITIONTOTHECITYOPSOUTHLAKE,TARANTCO., TL BLocK i', �� -r ' TJVOL 398-123. PG. 99, D.R.T.C.T. M1.� 3f ate,• _ _ PROPOSED SP-20A ZONING -\`,, " -•• L'pz !� � S jl 1aSi `- ` `' , .t, 128 RESIDENTIAL LOTS �. a a t }' !In 1 ACCESS EASEMENT r / 7 1 a 7�, / noun C.c000[ l COMMERCIAL LOT o d _ /\'� zvin ln.vuewh 113.04 ACRES OUT OF THE 714. $..o,l' Z�•.1 ✓ 'rm. _ e / O. Ioo• zoo• yoo• oo• W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 I _ _ r.r WO/1.MA.,ou1[r T.S. TNOMPSON SURVEY, ASST. NO. 1502 �" r .!' ! z p'R I i. _ '- P~`--~� � wvn..we n. CITY OP SOUTHLIKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS •I• r '�_ stuC .- . ,00• Salt,.u..CIS.riw1 .+ f ..r ' • '[.K,1PG.nc.+[o..c YfUCYrt 1aWu.r.C.%1..1 MI%.u[[v1..S[1l..![Lawn.pc. Nu..W-D1C. 1 ' ! .. N.�/ K 213 pow 0..9. i.«3411SL90[UM-SIMI ZOI M11 01..UM 1 /MATCH LINE HarE: NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL LOT WITHIN THIS e°U**�u•*�+"O'[ °'++Az.Tcu"'ez9. +'m1K*r•MO"011 / S000MSION ON TO SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709), DAVIS 8IVO. (F.M. 1938). CONTINEh'TIAL ���'1 1'�,1'F�,� ,« n� _...•,���„1W� J SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 BLVD. OR PEI TONVILLE AVE. • CASE NO. 2A 98-60 ' • PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT • It'';44' e.- .-:, '[1. - •w. .a-t)> :as,::•• t:: l•t n•<r•••r•t•...:;•a..:,tl. "-•.. • ,n.• •l.rlrI«I..«::! f: • Hw •I •11« «r n••r hr•r:Il::'••r w r•n. /1^it r.,•r• an Y9'O•:... i. ,.. •u tr • ci) Iinal•1«•.u•<« «n«vs•all. ..u•rA.«m.n� .11« • rr1 1«•::t w:• ill•. . trU HY'T'«• "`i `••K'a,I"4.H;• w`:L:-I,�rN '. h>I IK�P „•• « Y Gi•T %` twl«•,r•<r I•.•n.•Is,•11 I•a.«•« u h<_.••I irew:t(�,w:•Wil••I. N 1n.•••l•l r a "(Kl i•••u• ; • nt kiv.I !'L••l.y,•• fim WI. 11 •< !/::1' .) •r roI 0 [.1. un Yl •005C••al4,Y Lli:iti �Y!'ki n•H gtIs,!.'WW••. „: w.0•,u .<.r•• .�I1•N!C/.•n r� .r«+W<•• /i'lMUI rr,<t • .IIrMt :ils,o•s,1�l.cn..^«�`Kki^U•1N•`i•I.r 1,«wx NU IInUiuWvrl I F« «..I•rwl•w :• n•«:.Iw i•'ra''•n1rt l 0-1 iH•.r.DK•1•. I IV.-;) ••::tl•:<"••I i•IAT:«•••:L•ruw,I«•u rr Iws..s..•l«n•I•<••1C h••t In4ll« l C•vrl•. r -..; "!•1".I••l 1•• /i"'vw:::I, .r tr:...N::nt•:«I•r'.•..rr.< •1 o w.n w•Y'11•«•S•."1••• Ltlwll•t It«t tn9:-1.4u, ... . .:▪•1•.v.<••:m,!)I••l t:!.:'•1s,I,.ut lw U,..•' wiww l« :•1:E'••.• ::S 1NSY:::::fCti'MO.:Tj..•t.••.1)�:'V7Ft uI«. w:::::w rl•r.l-.l•.•r 1,ti•I h•l•w Nl• �• • •''•11:::•N •e•rr:wn•••-•I-�T.V -.«f•••Gw•«M.:t•••.t. •""—••I HI..I••• •••L••Is,«r«r•wN 1•II•• Yw«w•N�•1`•r•/Itt•ul• «!•I tw. .1.rt. i,w 1)Q.0 r •t/•'I rl«l Iulit 1w w I«U•!l•t••/T••« ,<u••O:H":.<«..• ..:'MNvl::•:l•]«`i.«r1•«In.«•Y:�i'.urliw TAw•N 1n Mlw Tr.i i•uu ;J M•Ct luiU:l •[I tr•. .«...l ,1"••. uuvu•t n 00'«'tT fu1.• raw Now CorL•1«Fwln• l•:r: .•••.•<A««.l•"N.Ill•.w«.r••r.•.1w C••in•l. TI•. •«•1•l :!:., iaKL.`:,tr. l un•• •N r :: •1 ita• r:r':•• o'ir r.• C•w r«w«. u♦no'• CfATI.1C.ii0• ):1 I ::I.r::::. •: M::I tw •• t««•I t l'<.yrtT�1:.«.•tr:ilsNiw, MY 1 • rt11T l t 1. JYn •h:l•ls,•.Is,. •n•1 LL tw.•Y « , •u•t,K•« !!T:•u•••rI• •rA•lu•rrn•Is,U•wr.nN•l Ar«r•I•.N ..wl♦•: N U:w ru I•:l u1•�I�tirr«lIT�• • t•l:•a.r••T •T r r vq•r w '< [a.<n tr... •Is,. �rt• •l:::tC'rlra....J::::n a•:t•hms,l Cn.w.,.••rnA�•t.•,1•:1.:•'Hai M•4lil M1<no:I•— ♦•I i•w. ,J U•4,Is,t•w rw••�.1::•. :• rww lr« l 1•.I ...•. •uu.n<••r«)v•••t 1• f �1••na•T,tCr.w•0wJaw•IK. 71 \� n•ul Is,Awns,. Iw•I uu V,_.cow«•U•u. wu w',.'!I'«•S •uu•«••I T.N b•t r•L••v« 11i1f - 5 1...ally THt I I r«r• i •Is, 11�iirUN•r«I H• a u<n«I •ru•tr«.• C F�•S•. t.n<•:•Iru olt ••'w •D:•NW •I l;w:«t :Ap•j•'I! I t•1.1• r• 1!1' a1'w•••m 6 • t U U .••,r<r•1 C•ati:•'..•. h. Ito r tl •.ulr•• I�.w Is,• •tL«IK t Ia IK co«tlflo "[KID• U••.Il rl'.-•r�•r i"u..•liv p;v O•II••.0 nw.ii CIl I..•:•c ..In.N.«uv. .ILl N lr r..h<r.a::'i.:.rt 4rt:•Is,• f•pt7Mr ,....1.•r•. «. -< r,.eKe 1..•,,.• nal-«-..•iY.eI..1. ..w• ulI w••lw ln..«m w•.0 un•t.r•n.c•uu•«•n. •) w u'u-•II.t h<r«••.«r•nl •na. '" «<r«•N t•••n•••1•a a••I._«.•r «. I l♦f11« ::,l T': T 11i:i U 4..,=5�:::-..:;J::w.1•t h kit: : N:1w: 'I•~ n.I: ^w T:•ps••:I.•w I III.tI'1«t•:•"•i:}'ll n 1.7!'Y,l••',• I r.)•i 1}•1 y,n ra••. •tir •rt �i7,: ▪ f''''•'•r«••••I n«H•«•w.••n•r•••:W•�,•.«u•,<••r•••rU M - rt n• tw::11N Siv I•••. ••rl••':.•-:•::rwi lw w•:::4i'.1.1 L1w r•<r•.•Iw•4lu".:M•1 f.:•:'M:.'.I:: .••••'.•[•r;t b•••":•w.•, r_",;: •r ,.«.<l«•.n"—H• f r'( l 21 KL. n 1."•• .il p I: PRELIMINARY PLAT • SOUTHLAKE WOODS ) _ •+G t ai«h:I i. ..r«« 1 .u.�p�)M•�..::a:r< ..h<«.•N Is, l j3::U BEING A REVISION OF TRACTS 0-7, AIRFARE ESTATES SEP 0 9 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHIAKE,TARANT CO., TX. "'ci 'n' a�;�• )'°t '• .s..' VOL. 098-127, PG. 99, D.R.T.C-T. + iiu":m:o..::.r•.• .,C min«l:'.. .•w•.r o..a«.:n:•I:IL.'r «.lwr`:1..`:rilwa Tn. La L I I L � PROPOSED SF-20A ZONING IC[Kt r. U.. t iU•, 1•Nfi,IS N •Cll•II Iln,ol•l:. r... n c.•m.i i, sl .o�.. Ll h<««.<irI«t w,l.. .u«i« 1 RESIDENTIALCSSTS < I ACCESS EASEMENT i.r. :i::i:::: :T. ,:'•::•"- <"•" I COMMERCIAL LOT ki. 'U'!a'U . .n•l N.<•:I L h•::::L.' v«IN rw r«`:«.,•r,..«<_,s,«•••.Wf• o•R[p. •.....1 m•LAT C.caoat 113.04 ACRES OUT OP THE ::•LLG•••l<•rn.rn•:'"',:.uv:N:I'is:ni kiln H,,..•"-• •..,1«•.I a:.,..••l t•. Irr r«••t it W. EAVES SURVEY, ASST. NO. 500 SODTCo 5. kilt T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ASST. NO. 1502 a "•1"•», '::� wu 00.l H 1•.., ••.•u«••r n•..I••l 1,Y•Ha.- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS • .0 ::�:.<.«.,w a:.:an.o•.es,Lw. r.r lien/04 MAI.aRtla[T 1 SOUTZ.I DOI)t•w rwawc•wcattsu<c uISO'.. POW. 10300.SCOW•Ittwl1ln.UM TOL L u 000 OK. SIM PAPA 1 to Iu ttm uo. r>r•Y.. WI 05 « NOtE. NO 016NV•AY ACCESS SNALL 6E .LLOwED IRON ANT RESID0f1W.LOT M1HN TNK II 61> la.f i.Olt • ., SL ECAI SIGN ON TO SW11.LA0E e::<0. (s ll. 1709).OARS BIM.((Cl 19)6).cONONcrITML SMI'••OF 3L.0 Oa•CITONNl1E C . a CASE NO. 2A 96-60 s 404, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT r"' City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ease No: ZA 97-087 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat -Southlake Woods and Stonebury, 126 Acres ±, in the W. R. Eaves Survey Abst. #500, the T.J. Thompson Survey Abst. #1502 and Tracts 3-7, Airpark Estates APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Toll Bros., Inc. Dowdey. Anderson & Associates, Inc. 4010 Eider Drive 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200 McKinney, Texas 75070 Plano, Texas 75093 Phone : (214) 562-8655 Phone : (972) 931-0694 Fax : (214) 542-0245 Attn.: Elvio Bruni Fax : (972) 931-9538 Attn.: Lynn Meyer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. * With the exception of a few comments which address the entirety of the development, this review is limited to the areas actually changed by this submittal. All other areas are still subject to stipulations as approved with the previous preliminary plat by City Council. The areas of change include: Southlake Woods Block 1 -Lots 34-43, Block 5, Block 6 -Lots 16-20 and Stonebury Addition Block 1 - Lot 13, Block 2 - Lots 8-13. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to Quantitative Land Use Schedule: a. Correct the total number of lots shown for Stonebury to 35 (32 res. lots and 3 common areas). b. Change the acreage for both Southlake Woods and Stonebury to reflect the area taken from Southlake Woods and added to Stonebury. Change the densities affected by the change. 2. Above changes should be reflected in the title block. 3. Provide easements for water sewer and/or drainage in compliance with plans as approved by Public Works Department. 4. Although a 35' building setback line is required along both street frontages for corner lots zoned SF20A, the applicant has requested a reduction to a 30' building setback along the side yards adjacent to the street for the following reverse lots: Block 1 - Lot 39 Block 5 - Lots 1, 5 & 6. (P & Z Action 7/17/97: Delete) • City of Southlake,Texas * Please be aware that the length of the east property line of Lot 6, Block 5 must be at least 80% of the • length of the south property line in order for any home to front on the south property line. The Amenity Center which was to be located on Lot 1, Block 1 of Southlake Woods is now to be located on Lot 9R, Block 2 of Stonebury Addition. * Lot areas and exact lot dimensions are not required on the preliminary plat and although it appears that the lot dimensions and areas required by the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, have been met, the applicant should be aware that all lots must be a minimum of 100'wide at the front building line, a minimum of 125'deep,and must have a minimum lot area of 20,000.00 square feet for lots zoned SF-20A and 43,560.00 square feet for lots zoned SF- 1A. All lots adjoining properties zoned with or having a low density residential land use designation must be 125' in with at the rear property lines. All lots adjoining properties platted and having a SF-1 or RE zoning must have a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet. * Two intervisible boundary corners of the site must be geo-referenced by state plane coordinates in accordance with section 8.03(B)of the Subdivision Ordinance No.483 upon submittal of each final plat, and, prior to acceptance of the subdivision by the City,a digital computer file of the subdivision must be provided in accordance with Section 8.04 of Ordinance No. 483. * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial,they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, park dedication requirements, off-site sewer extensions, and off-site grade-to-drain permission and/or off- site drainage easements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. Toll Bros., Inc. L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97087PP2.WPD -? L H • • • • �,, x,I LOT ii;,,R , ,,,•,a..a\ A Rea, a F _ ' ;?' 1 . �.,�... FzoragEp . VEOtSt cuLS F.nl. No. IssB ^^°rwet e^� 1 zt c,wuox accE'L `p1w"', ,�,' SITE • a I ...n.+n.•—Darer a pa m lrcr. °°I•;',n'.v °-=0.1,0 u / oa,c, I —_,.0N MAP TI LCCATI \( . go CI .1rcr 'r` , .m / ' ... ,.,fY'wu.. '.m•, r1.rls .l.R rr PIA 'r - 10 w�i l' a, M1 - J. L1 ,L, 4 Sa'1'�,Q"i, . a 2J Yias �, •NOLLow1 -p;�s l'2 :� JlpxEv{uCNI lwe c-, r. yl oa,cr '• a.a c 1.' C4TJ .00 i. N . . " .. J. - 0 w ia1.a� GFQ ir#P !) �� ,la+a I .,_„... t.• 32 's' Kam. 1=81� 's .REVISED AREA OF PLAT 69 a �.6 e(2��0� IS , S oft ur o <.704.�.. u.a ,c, ' - It y r _ — _ �i c . 1 Ink • J Mil __ _ . _ w e.oT '1 4 • JQ2. ilia�{��'�1 IJ r`Yj s D1•x. "'"?.Nos;:J " L , i1 Ls0`"`• �'�w""`°a al,11T �,p ..C.,Stet 133a°` Y #:,,,. {rUJM .. au °..•"^ i• DM MOLL.• elxo. . ` • 1 1,c,0 .b� p2 ,_ a33- I, k41. -,:ploo......4 � a� J-I• [i m'S''e' .� Oa'',. �•o ._, . . ',0 2"i.�r5.w „tip ' +iJ i� 2 rF ,ylal.-L,.,It�- �[71 'k�-' rj�.r to;•a1.l c+•irutl a �r•n4T4 Eu 20 _ ..A C a1a i,r �l�Siyp «► .a..., a.a 1 a i 1 �yb�. - &' '''-•-. ' p .yy REVISED AREA OF PLAT 7 LOTS 4.31 C. I r 1 'F->.�' , ,T r'_ ... w or ocawe_J% ..m. ny•� , A! Tz4i,i.n. �.: , L 2.�rMP.�1�. j `POIN oP B, IN. • � ''71". � 6'•' ,A 4 aa,o.J j 1 I Of�eyCs�l J 1 , ii°r N wuan Z I�� P(n, - ,'}�T' �°`� ,�.-I J<l.a. °`'+ (,•-2o�V� .arc. ', �J°P' �. 1- ,�a,r,;�.'-:t .' E., CIII) J LL'.y.l) I ,J ( J f en ._u�n„ v i,[T ,,,.••,.,,,t,. , ?-„,-,,,,-„-,-...1r.7" rAid '610- 1°T.:::.'N- -1-' ,- liFeftgal 3 ": - - , --dri li-HAsEc • -.:1,,-- KZ V1SED ialdi _ '� ANI c s.o t•'JY'c PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR �` ' �{,P+�J L%� « .o r o JT• STONEBURY PLAT AND 7=.,• N —.r.r'.—di`4• tfTrT _•.-.-- - - tw'ua•Tr:rr.— 2 - PEYTONVILLE AVENUE _I SOUTIILAKE WOODS _4 f1" r•°f:::" i' wm Br (COUNTY ROAD 3088) 1 I ' 3_m dw.a`, a' AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES � �`� AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTIILAKE, "'�:s" . no.o-.""' Ia,o.I. i �.a,i`r. OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS 'alcr Q STONEBURY a:.c0 ru.021 1 W.1 , ' t _ 32 SF LOTS I HOA LOT I i .t I 23.16 ACRES OUT OF THE W.R.EAVES SURVEY ABS. . •----.211201.am mo t•[t Eu, NO.500 SOUTHLAKE WOODS . 129 SF LOTS 6 HOA LOTS I COMMERCIAL LOT f. 1 W. EAVVES9SURVEY ACRES OABSTUT P TH.E500 °wnw`iL..Iur a....r_ '• T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY. *BST. NO. 1502 2...9 2.9 I..9 W�a a.wa CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS N°1• L•[Wlt L.oaLa arm Lama UN Wa Ac GL[ls sp J,1 M.01•.v.s.r 3*LOWED..x.t atw.M,L 00r0 130 a.•, IW�.NWGA LNG4[[iING AftLICAl11•OEM{{ ,t T••.(•110l,:mz.a IQ Oa,ricatowda r,w0 µme`CWT....aw la..0.1 ]M.s.awu.����,M St lOa Y]0a n 32.M 13.t ,M 0' 200' 100' B00' 90U' TOLL•YOJ.PC. SF �� -J /]7/O/L/1 MwU[l'.w.Wllti.x A.L1MM:,wiLS,INC. 0010 Meg DWI t V11 1lll.�'/l 1121 v,LLw.:t.Nttx UW.[,,Ui31 lW n 1x.10/NLY.itlaf.0070-.. Sr..L[ I' too. ILwxU,ft.[L1„••1 •..r a...•....• .•u- .•- a. tP a•laa ..2.a ,31 11101 ,.. VD J U L 21 199."..,... HN IwA .. . ._ �,cm*.,y,M [.JaE Nu.2A91�2 SHEET l OF Ary. REV^.•vr RM..,gaOL • City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-088 PROJECT: Plat Revision - Stonebury STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 8R, 8X (Common Area No. 2), 10R, 11R, 12R, and 13R, Block 2, and Lot 13R, Block 1, Stonebury, being a revision of Lots 8 through 13, Block 2, and Lot 13, Block 1, Stonebury, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas, and a portion of Tract 2A2 situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract 500. LOCATION: On Stonebury Drive approximately 700' west of the intersection of South Peytonville Avenue and Stonebury Drive. OWNER: Toll Brothers, Inc. APPLICANT: Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc. SURRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Two (2) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (6-0-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASE5\97-088PR.WPD 0 1 I - T ... _ •..: •. 4 CFRIC CT ... , ----- ,_. • , - --- . , , • i r-------\-::-.------`,,...- \\/... : 1-01142°-.* - -'-----'2` '•i \ I ' . ' \ /- I.,---- ; .\-`• •-...........,L ',_ ' . ,_ 1 - -, 7 - *N! . ' I I '... "---.< • , I- .-- -. .4t:',--.....:,------ -"--- ,,, ',....---__._-,_ 1 ; ' 1 1 , i • d I d , 7...**.,.....1 ...,. ' ...., ,,,,.... ..,.....47 i1 7-------ir--- smog) ,,,.. „ ,___, , , L,,•. ,....L.„,..., .4',„..., ---./..„, i 1 ' IT , :,,,, i----- ! , :._>,,,..;• .--- . ••••-- - •-A I e "•-• 1 1 . ,// 010 'N.. - -' -•?•-'. /.'•- . r"--- ; • „., , _,„...-iLSv i i ,: i—/ \ : '• II tI( . ' ' / /NY...- ' 1 I I : liAi./ l /,.,' / • 1 , , •, ,„ ' ta... Illialc ., ME= 1 r- 111 • . s sf- ' , ____, .- :, \$_,,, • ' \ \ II 1 1 7.. . .., . a,.. .ii iiiills.e117•12 -..___;,:-. , . 1 \ , ! ' i 1 \ 1 \ olp. IIEST 911.171•LAISE ROA" 1 •-7. ,___ ---.J. I , \ r trioadiedif #_,.. , , ,....-. ----7 i ,....... ••.. , .,....m... ..- I e N..? -_-.-----1 t,4•" k t lky,0_,• i -• ch I i . . T , &Ewa k—.,,-,•>_,, '.• .,. • 1 I . A 16.4,6,1 I EIP lillarik":Ball 1 ; i vocf... ow, I Ail „.--.4 011IF: ifil 11*. i'. - 0 Ne.,••i it Wi'`', — Li, I .. .*-114312ff . 1,110glib. - - , I I . 1 All 5' 43- riairici4n. i 1.,--,,,,,ACIF mm z • ,,..,.I.M , •,•4110 tr \ EST lk I . I \ I . ! . , ' • 4 1- ...'' I : 1 - , I II*1 j 1 1i i .i;• \ .r...., ,...,..„):, 11.------il I , , ,9 \ '1 ... .... ......--, , 1 1 —Trige Ali • ^ • .••• • -111** 1 1 '1 7—,.......\\‘‘, 141 II I —, . WIN '1 _Ld.,__Imov : ' •-• I 1 -, ii ,._. 1-7: - ______::_-_____ I i : • • -i% MAI6 ..' 7' / ' 1 '' I I 4 , _.1•2: i .2. •.11 I. I ' ------741- Z. , • ' 1 I -WEST-OT-NT. i I • 1 vp0 1111361110:.,1 c..AFFai_ I--,--\ •• ,','---/_4 ';___L__ /'''', ' _...., . , 0 i ir-7. _ TRACT MAP .-------,k i .,___, • , ,, •-,..., I , rrittitti-4: O // •\j \ \I \ \ / 11 IM\•• _.i \ ..\, ... LI , ' POINT OF BEGINNING 1/2"I.R.S. N89'04'05"E 1 1 . ' S. 89°04 '05"W. 846.27' A,' 1/2"I.R.S. ‘ .9 , ‘ I TrOPF 0 .. \, 19 `. BLOCK 2 I \ iiiik31, p 7 6 5 �R • cs. STONE BURY AIDDITIC 1..., �o 8 x • A - 1/2" ' ; (c�;5i iRS.1STONEBURY DRIVE L: Q / / ,2. • , 2 T j �-,� 3� T4 1/ I.R.S. iie' 6F' - . c34 • f 13R > 3 2 i c9 cr I/2"I.R S. •' ll. I') SF....._ ... ....y -20A • . iiir, e• � S:• 1 : ' . • ., I 3 I/2"I.R S. If t I;2" I/2" - I.R S. Cv4 I. R.S. i ) i 6 4 R 1 N 12 N 4 1 Sri Li l 1 w o - Z ` _I w TOLL BROTHERS :9'31'28"WLri - / J C 0 I. ' < i 167.0•' I �5o Q Z iSTONEBURY W o J • R.O.W. (� I I C E /' I I R : w I ,I 2 - o u-) N LL L.L. u BLOCK I Al —I -) ! e' I o D / W 5 5 b A _ N co W 1 I w7 N 10 0 I/2"L I.R.SO Q I.'2"I.R.S. 28"W > 1 W 164.52' U 1 H Z `r I/2"I.R.S. Q o jr:, 8 7_ \ U? v-i W ' (U \ N 9 U I R 1 I.R.S. co 0 N1\�• ADJACENT OWNERS N • . . - 5 6-„2• — AND ZONING _ TOLL BROTHERS SPIN #14 DOUG MCKELVEY _y • 15 C•-•1 - 73---3 \ -1 q.t.:, / BLOCK 2 • • REED • ) .L!y 11 Lr4 I.I. Sa MAR rw g •-• ..r-._ STAR 09 TM Y 5 COL.I7 0 0....••d..11.S OATIAN OELR001 C .KM 0T ATO 111RO.T THE IA0.1WED.ITS BAT AUTIa1O0.00•t.a THE sal T Or.OF A TRACT 0 L.9TUARD IN 11. M .11.a 04E5 Lt7, S1•Cl 1A.I1N 5m 0 TASAS.CAMM1 I.•CCOId•0 TO • SITE THE D 0EO M L0 I000 vOLUNE 11.PAM 194E GEED REC10i TAM AIIT COUNTS.TT.APO a•a Yon PASTOR A. T a ---111 COCA TON s1a6ED AS 70111 1 - i ACKARO ADONION Y •a• •1 • !I aWrO.t•P.l NAII M SWM.011QntlE.K fOl M r,0 440331 C10E11 0 S•a]ACT.LO PO.f aPIG \ V0.UYE]66-12.PAGE TOO. •1 N 00'TER'.ltla fQr Aw N aox3Y.N7.TS TnT Aw N Ma'05 E 31.=RUT no.M NOAl1EAST COMP 0 P R.T.C.T. LOT T.OAR.(STARS CO.E000E0 N CAMET A SLa[TITS 0 M RAT NEC..0 I.M.,C0M0,RN.a r • _ _ Mq SOUTH dl 0=IS n..10 S=SECO.EAST•]STENO 0 101135 FLIT ALONG S..RTIOLKLE AK TO a.e oO FAME 1.TO PNNSHP. ^�n • ]•/•4 w1T Am I1Ia, - VOLUME 115117.PAGE 692 LOT l M..O 1UV1l4 a 0 0(MS 0 murk,.0 1EC0a9*EST 34 II FUT PASSPa•Tn.a0•PM EM CAP NAaEO. D.R.1.C.t. P.O.B. ,.N M\10 �i 1 1 AMA TM1030C FOPS IS M lOST I.0 50UM PIYTO,KLE AK.AT ILL A TOTAL 0aIAN0 0 10N.1/RUT t0 A T/f• n N, T• M11 POI mow M M T L.0 S.TRACT: VICINITY MAP �'^•"•• -� LOT 1 .,.•ti ` Mel •N�1i �IN10No m°(M004S I7 AL141 VIC=0f.vs s:0•SIIOa Q IGa.a R(r o(fu•u1 raw•MMTGE IN // N 89'04'05'E 997.92+ __ __ --- r-_,;.;]'__ --7:�9-f!`Y%fv7.: l69•7S ukr,i,M' TO•u/E 1•l,T--� IA. I••. 0 II.mcw 1 sNO a>9�IISmar40400 Elsilw«c lili.Mi.latCsor EAST Ao rw olOAm:.�=.aa as�sw,EE�iEtT10 MONK. It i.Yv00 NOW MREIORE.010 AIL TEN Of MS PRESENTS 'i BLOCK 2 :3 -£:.-.GA Y"g;8 4 �4 • &„I T• u'/ w v DA,r� I L•N u ' .o T TT1•.s Rb asa.1wa 44* EEilw�Aw4 as04403 R THE EAL.000.040 nu si0E20 0..4.00.To T'K o1Y u ;; B b: 7 A -n,:.•P•s� 5 •- 3 r 1 I• N R SOUTHLAKE I4MANr COUNTY.RL.S.r0 f[OO 4801*1 0(pO.R 10 M MLCs USE M STREETS AM G4YC1•R A.. n.. . 'L•A]!'E i'.�+ �:� T'- an....vi:n Tr Sari M(10 . 0.�_a "S`f. _'..� III A, ]]]• �•.�?C. I nMi!IIY NUO At COUNM1.VMS MS M �M OAT v �A•�- Mfr. RGBERT G.GOON `!. ••n-• :•• j •E,E.. '1bA�Y '• VOUNE 6211.PAC[1310 i7rAw �. `fir•\'Tr•9I 'B,d R.O wPRGPOSED I�1 I O.R.7.C.i. 2 L:p u/P•� / T Sa•11•=E or sn.p 1 V'• �' OCDCATIDI !I S I � �. i Sox. . I, !, __.•.50' . aI^': ` a WLT AOEnONr 0[KLOwENT CORIOEATM 9 1 i "/'•]33'En • 4.0n i4c1 l Y T 2 ti 1 COMMON AREA 1 DETAIL n STAN Or a"L••r `/ 1} ,,•], Q,p,t t 2 9'fl'I.'Fi I• NUM NE M UNOERVOED AUMIAM1•a n•S OAT PERSONALLT.P0.0.GAM ILAA•0m.1ESOO.r Cr OIA,(AU _]SYL •G 1�•y(�•` ^/I4 W 3 ^ iSa:E .1 W101.00 CCM..•00100.IWI OOM TO NE TO 0 M PEAS.•>DY NA.a SIaSOOm TO Mt I a.. u7;A L _SDtili:!'•_ 5O'n • I^G•TP u/[ : •v= I W SCALE : -.P sf1.O,r.Aw AOUIONLE0013 TO NE THAT NC EXECUTED M S AK Iq M HMOSEs Aw GONor.ETo,DEKA. S-• •Sr.E4, ITV Y ..• c_Y1L J1_ _'NDJr=i 1 - D EIPREa•D.M M CAP•OR TERM STATED APO AS M ACT APO DUO OF S••,,O CC VENATIOL %f T? 10 _12 4 . .r Pik,5 1 5. .,(TI�•M1 P'u I 11 n w 1KN NAw AIo s(r o mlFi w MS M o•r n nYE. o r I Yn.W` 'RVR,s -6SYEi " S.YRTl3 1 b > d�t..t NOTE 8 .•-...;• ,s I' ti_I«_••f:•-. d /•T:' • Is:1s.EA.� - .t� 8E - Q NOT r Earn n U V7 uala,.11. 'rurc `� COYNGN AREAS ARE PRIVATE ANO - CI ( s:' -- v'�'�_ fLNEBUR ` �h yp��fTfyyu�• LOT I BLOCK :1 v.l CCA BE AREASOwNED ARE YRIVTAMED : aS1 ua±STONEBU$Y CT' • ` y.Lyl t CARROLL I1101 SCHOOL A00111ON BY THE HOYEO.NERS ASSOCIATION E. ; •n 11 ,^ 4 ..1"•"t In" 2 _••f I W CABINET A SIRE 1.60 11 wl :� - +Y •:2t lyS T, !'•. -9'li l4YTa rt n 1NOTE k Y}�r : i]•.' I,l.f I I. J L�-'t n -iN'f•;r1_'^P^ Via•„:!•. ' :g \''�7 C a �sTa Y� iy0 J G ,u5a 9 t- 1 5 8IR' 6 ..1 •w m• 1 me 10•PUBLIC IANOSCAPE $ n `••REAL` peioC 1-1 - '-..1 Z r. EASEYET.T aLL BE 5500 11EO BY . d 12 I `: g `10'•9., Y y.• •;r • L 1>'EA I o. /. TIRE HONEOAHERS ASSOCIATION d j 1 wgl• YEL':!:_19�IW_6_309'S ISS_ •-.1,20 'I .aN F- E-ts rW7E,E'7.- NOTE .O 9 ft. \E� 7 Y.i'rp !•]TH. E.NEiDMr W 4 xl'• E.. ow OWNERS OF ALL CORNER LOTS IP AFT r•(-••^,9••.,.N\ tt,Tf..9.i) ,E-. II =Y ET•P) . SHALL YENTA 1 S4111r 1aANGVES . 13 I , 1 _0•n.-RIP 'Sy^'•:S I a IA',`i ^I 19 : . Al ACCORDANCE NTH THE aTr Li I I,f9•T ]T.F }"']+ 3 15j i ' V` FRTAPI•C SCALE FINAL PLAT SUBDNSION ORDNANCE. I ].• S). s.I•� xF - ,.; /Q`Cf>•... �a . A. 3. ITtilln •' •E• ...1 s. • FI M N. 0 5551 vl.Er 0 1 / "•' yl• I PARK PLACE - - OF NOTE I \T` ))l•. !'- ) 15�1N=l9•a O/E-YTT,IY NO PNVAR DRIVEWAY ACCESS x(E� • •H lH'•, it, /I .TO I3U�v To S PEriOMYUE AVENUE (.,.....Lor 11 A(/�6 `TOTun Si '•^ •'^.i. 17_.ity 1e z,,ell BE PERarTED ,fi t5 0.- -16 .' f�•M�f""L ?_f' 1 °,lpy •»R'• L rR r,n. G/rP--.BLOCK 2NOTE L-L-.D. :.T4 ,0'JL t1M'_ __.F, y IALL E>15TING STRUCTURES(3) -- �- - AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF TO BE REMOVED. ] S 89Z9'4p•W 100t.12' \\�,AM. W SOUTHLAKE I. LOT •1 I O.Lr ? REC'D JUN 2 3 1997 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 'NOTE BAKER ESTATES I WURONGS ON LOT I&LOT 20.BLOCK 2 1LL CABINET A SLIDE 1575 < BEING 33 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A BE REW9R0 TO FRONT OR STONEBURY ORIYE P.R.r.c.r. 8 x 23.1641 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE (....'Ksr SIDE 0 tor). W.R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 500. ' 1. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS BOARDWALK & ZONING COMMISSION LOT AREAS NOTE i . Walt R �011 ] ME Ott Of SOUMLAKE RFSERKS 111E R101T TO REOURE I,•1 Dole: Se QMB;R 111�+ "4_�N.Y.FINIS.ROOF ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED 7 Ems_\) Nltt LOT I •M.nN Y LOT I •I0J.934 Y 1MB THIS ADDITION. THE WN.IUY ELEVAl10N5 SBO4N ` PREPARED SEPTEYBER,1995 LUI/ -lfI1.O>Y COO;2 ]a.•p n Y ARE BASED ON THE YOSI CURRENT NfoRYAnoN AVAEABLC r I. CRO✓TOT: ""� LOT 1 •IT 09„.,4,Y 1 •.,4,„.I,, A ME TINE THE PLAI IS FE EC/MO MAT BE SUB.ECI TO •I•• LOT• •II.I/l OIY LOT. • ETY •I• LOTS •210599 Y LOT! •=0.2N111 Y CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS.OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN, City Secretory: /I...... / . /•L.-. of. .I7.5p SOY LOf 4 •fa,s,I,Y YAr ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH r10O1 CRITERIA. of 1 -.0 14 SFLOT, •10,04 53 SF , , ./- •I=1 11 • Lf45 s)SE LOT 4 •20105.Y THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET�SLIOEa�3DATE.JQ�Yl7v LOT 9 •IPas,S Sr LOT I •M.l,if SF // -_ LOT 10•/0.TS.S,Y WI IY•10..4 Of Y LOT TT•03.I30.F Y LOI 11•30.25T 55 Y LOT t/•20.I30 12 Y L01 Il.30.391 9]Y MS IS TO 0.TK1 MAT I.a IIO010 PIMMS•11.0100D I00E1901r WO LOf,l 31.011T4 Y let 11 IO 5.911 Y CURIE DATA SUMMON OF M STAR 0 TES.NALTNO PLATTED M AIOK SATONSTOT FN11 LOT.•12.NI a Y LOT,..30,51 30 Y OYMER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR 4•.�• • AM.TUAL s•A IT a M C.A.A.MAr All.LOt WOOER.u0.02 Lot 15•a l].20 Sr 0 0 0 0 0 01 C) CHATEAU DEVELOPIIENI CORP. TEAGUE NALL ANO PERKINS,INC. * 'L •'0 15.0•0 PO5n 0 0.1.......a PROEw?NAMED a NE Otaro..0 a0a 3 Of,.•a..lf a Y e•+M s fur C0w[cpTlERLYNn MA1 SU1RK1 NAa Sr,E 0 0a(11 N• LOT TT•0.10MY I•T...a' I•TIP.PTr O•M••nr I-12Yrlr A•Ma/le O•3,20•14• a•aX•1• 500 GRAPEVINE HWf, SUITE]50 I�w.RING BOAEVARO .•M1r. r WiN. A >ION.Uf T •S•I,0 Y LOT.•1l.,Ha Y ••NOW N•100.0Y• . MOP ••»m' A-225 Orf ••TTSm ••MW URST. MAAS 7605• IRVINf TEXAS 73W1 '. ✓/LOt t9•1lser Ol Y f-aN' -I)7.CE' -M.Y f•Tllr •e•>I• f.Nor 7•1.0 (6I7 426-19E0LOT M•IO.laa Y ••ST 0 L•100a• A•REM' ••11n• L•10. L•IN9P L•17.a• (41f)426-206! 21• 231-17405 aahL21• :51-•3•e %w NM C•Y NO IA IS-a FILED PLAT City of Southlake,Texas 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 111Pase No: ZA 97-088 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name: Plat Revision - Lot 13R, Block 1 & Lots 8R thru 13R, Block 2 of Stonebury being a revision of Lots 8 thru 13, Block 2 and Lot 13,Block 1, Stonebury and being 0.64 acres out of the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abst. #500, in all 4.312 acres APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Toll Bros., Inc. Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. 4010 Eider Drive 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200 McKinney, Texas 75070 Plano, Texas 75093 Phone : (214) 562-8655 Phone : (972) 931-0694 Fax : (214) 542-0245 Attn.: Elvio Bruni Fax : (972) 931-9538 Attn.: Lynn Meyer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. 1. Change the lot designation of Common Area No. 3 to Lot 9R. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: • a. Preamble must reference the platted subdivision and lots, and the unplatted acreage. All P g owner's deed records must be included. b. Resolve the discrepancies between the metes & bounds description and the graphic labels. 3. The following changes are needed with regard to the owner's dedication and notary statement: a. Provide the company name of the person authorized to execute the plat following the printed name and title below the signature line and in the notary acknowledgment. b. Add ". . . and as the act and deed of said Toll Bros., Inc ." to the end of the last sentence of the notary acknowledgment. 4. Delete the stree name change symbol. 5. Changes to the east boundary 13R, Block 1 and the boundary of Lot 14, Block 1 (Common Area No. 2) cannot be made with this request. Show the original configuration as previously platted. The metes and bounds description and acreage must also be changed. 6. Label the width and type of easement shown along the west line of the subdivision. •. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. n T—tf City of Southlake,Texas * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the 1110 intent of this requirement. Denotes Informational Comment cc: Toll Bros., Inc. Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97088PR2.WPD • • 1T 6 • • ! E _ uwf..9.r..Tmt.wa.vm nminvfw �— • ] (RW CTAIIY lir TA3 1 to SWOaAMF COUNTY Uf iAMwNT S 23•160311.E..MyAmnoa WIOUav 61 .WSur Am,mir.ruYv 1 WHEREAS.TOLL ail, C.�•,.yLia.1446.17.............1.....7. No SOuu m Ca,.l...r,r. n•Mlumyua�IrlY JRaIu.Wrru.arlrrm.N.IIT1f'a'a..lw wlfW4aO --- J I ... _6 w.,9w..a u/.Pau of W•n...d u w + ir.N..50P r u.C•n u15r•w.r. d nv�Y of N Lfzl__-1 t; _. �� _ f' - P _ SITE44�� g-T T.nw CuuW.Tur W,Ir wufpnw. r .0 rvWure lllM.ryv 39n wJ. rNEH3....yEf .W....Amy...OAS.A mawvd a.+.Y-wu.�r Disams l•yAMe--- 11 _— I l L-ub DWRun°.dTu..YCraf.TauWOennl. nbCrblb.vb+YWe.yumWd.cvrv.mO.Wr.W.mPY+IW.a11.•f0'Dr.uhr of llfW4W.Ja°moos Si_—_.-WITS= n•Fit1S P1'—•� -- •.7— LOCAl10NprnYwfI]'uf:w. Da the(INTBEDUO NO.aI m al••n.•W wm.nyY'.I-+.yI.W pmyN 00•I.'.9'w.Hl.fMa;N00^.I'12'W,m]IS 1..W N.19O.'01'fi., THENCE GUY IFlE'01126 Dot r b W ul ad:um..a N um 1,a b ram, fi ,I1 1191 Mt6.I.aaOA,curr of L.N 3SIEPuu.ul.raa.CI.N.Carnes.A.".St,1313w THENCE H..rll'I."E.].r mamati ma nda bua�. t 'I MPIM Raga,w Tian Cour3.r0.4IC..S19.0.1I..W.LN..]MN Moues rd Su,Pe,mNN MENCES i3•i.'Sl N.3394e ua Y'ua.uf.n fu.v�. Y 'IY� w.aumNa llHNr OF BEGINNING.a'�i.a mC r.tor rvmr. THENCE S'l.3911-W.I1 fl Mt ea•:,'uu toe a.u-mew PR u. THENCE i.0.0:3-4.I!NMe•••.3-u,,ra to*am.Pal ar auy••..rYa:e r f Ian many u a swum,umu.W rimy a w,nrA+We el 1719921 a Imu•al NUM Ma ' Q S0 °a I:ONImLN1Al 1 Y --II rHE`10E+Yuy.a1 ww11:9 Mc mOaWurrd:wca.3-ua mJavunr e rail tee tet,472I, `1 R'A d� THENCE S N3THENCE 5 ''N'w.MS.r hmuO.Y'un.al as a..uv. At • • — -- - KALE l a.100S.THENCE runt Ts•W,f000 w. uAar, um,6, et 23,ruyuaruwyr VICINITY MAP :I: A.yrn..yr•am3$ Um,Wr y. rya al Prl:'Sr,anmwlnm Im +-NCealy al Ssum IL'W WTHE.CE I. MolrIm IT 003 h.4W..at W aux MraY".atpa bmar i•y uM THENCE S00.]I'•l11-can.pomuea•oM 100 7100 trap,mug,tear,wu m...r Tara•'a•W post tea.,.Mom of 1]f PO A.W.:+,N eaw a S. ACNARD ADDITION a. 06•5633-E., VOL.3118•42,P4.100 THENCE Au.W cu.w 4111 me,r a W d.ail um*e.a ti use w a far gum.1W Pm M.B.KIOO FAMILY LT0.PTNRSMP P.R T.C.T. lt ly y tral po ,. pyalamiuml.e kB r a at,al..50•10"a mesa.6133001s•w..m•I VOL.1158T,ID 6112 M.iy u,S.,O1'.P I: ROBERT G 4000E OR TOT. A • THENCE,.mad mu STSI ma...Warauuric a'.uu.ml.a..uom: VOL.0212.PO.1 310 THENCE!.6f+72'I4•W..111.13 ham•S•...W a uTana OR TC T THENCE N.OVII'Ir W-171-E Gum.H•.amI avamr. THENCE IL un']r WRAO MINA K•a W+trams POINT OR COMMCNCIMB THENCE N.I0YTI-W 3000mm•H-...W set 1st me, POINT OF BEGINNING 1 TMENLE N.•1•Il'BE E.911 MG•Real rbav LOT 3D.BLOCK 2 an'•A•N•90A'03•E I I iN•O.OS. H•1T• a,.m. THENCE 3A•.1'H•W,IM.91b,m a K•b.tail a Go tat. •COMMON AR[♦NO-) �• -I __ n•a_--Ci u• W MEMlE N.11Z"y'E-11f.T r.a'w'.,IOU ala,..n.'. AMENIT ICEN TER•A.f9.,c�/,W.. SLOCN 2 n Y 1HEKE N.SfW'03-6-III 13 4 r i Pam w Boy�y al armass all!av l I1•, Z •.is,wbl o!.L BR • ST0NEBORY AUDITION yn US `` , M4J, A '. f 49 PUBLIC INDUST MANDONM[M BY PLAT j\ f III -. it�.'' w - SOLI TNLSPE CROSSING ' `✓" '1 N tllI INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY W.,y a0r.y..L a duly am,1R,maml.um w Mc mitt..4, NOW,T0E0E0O[E•RHOW ALL AIEN IT THESEPRESEMS: i 6. Meeases, noted\ �12 IAaa p.uuW]I.uJAlm Ctlua .Slit d \ ♦ • '✓• ✓ ^, ` b plot m,d taut., +fry Caul.Tear. Trl TOLL B0.1?4,INC..Toy by W mmYp m•IOUVNprL la July u6uoad Y•L Om p.o1T*or CAB. A.SLE I614 •G)•12•06• .'aL ... j�I)5 Id r. ••. Cab A SLICE t•23 \ Vli + •, • , m,a MN rl.,.uuy Ma pv.uuWw San,n•lpmpaTrWIIR.BW IALa Yrpm llKBWl IS,' a. ; ar STONE/DRY.m•OUIm m Me Cln AI S ,"••Taal Cuay.T..m.W Y...11 1.rr m A. PR rc r Mm. �.NI I W mum,. SA Anw T..y W mum,Mown maA TO..Pb ems me Ma.mat,m..Y... q✓e%\O.- _T m •. 1Q ' J Tmr 1;oYw Du, T..Ca.d[LguK Ce•P•g.tl.•,is 6,...,9.WAtl. •Il �' y laF syW. l.1 1 +A syW_ \ So.oy' IJ�.•` I u; �u• ,°`m�•"!F• <F NaW Nana. MatlNw: WITNESS nT rod ao laWaY..Ta•r cu,Y.Tmm.i.Nit rld_ 199, 4� p" pit I. a I Ei z ! IOR I w W :y -s O Tail Bm•,l.g `�^,��1 CITE C..,.1a. lama Use Gap Cm," _I •• / rll I : } SyM- Stoat -- Elm P.MAL N.AMOK Mmy. .2 ^I it !*".... I � S STONEBURY W ..AI N.m fIi.MoNma: �3 :TW�• H AAK e1 STONEBURY CT. DRIVE a uW. DTI• wiMraOEh w XAS I _) 1,1II R a A Norm C.Mara MToa. Soma,Commas...Am. BEFORE APE.AN,.NaN3W ayr0n.a mu Mr P.m,T%Wm.d Elm P.BA.:L Pmp.Sail.. r1 Y L DC A. I. di rP-LS.y*E LawAm.a..p.Ar wA..—A wham+,l b,..Y mal.ml WAAaAIa4N uu,Z' aYpy ��fall -' (l O_' • Pl*S P5*Tia.: Nit r+Tana Ir am Lr MpW44 W.uW.ra N.�saps. - I N Tr I YT-A �IA .• Iw C la • f9 Dm.: Doc Grm Wm my faN W ml N..Ru I 199] _ _ m :9 II: ItR 14.B S LOT BLOCK_ARE, If IwW.riuNmuyrW4LrWbRa sla«Taww IIm Z a 9.. H910 • •• I Q —,a•A I,'1 Cau• I. • NI1].i PALM NANEC,aaaaT.Pw,IR SgOOb J :- - , — d I• a41y' r E If 3R Om i1 I S R 1 • 21)vf Y00.'S�f kTIFICITF 1,61f MtRw. N4ONVO C0n1]IISSIP-''-_Ira ;, by me us.awe*al Gm,to y prom m m.aam4 W Na m Oa mrm°y ro,A,..b a..T Mom. sroxesuRl A lrlox ci.b:.: maampr.yA'e'm°"°".I.a •• J • n�y/to . 'i y, BLOCN 2 `wE I — I �1-------- L BY ME HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION xmr11 PLAT REVISION NOTE — �Y11 Bea ER ESTATES cNrsa..r • LOT 13R,BLOCK 16 LOTS 8R thru 13R,BLOCK 2 • 111[OWNERS Of ALL COgNER LOTS gpeER! 4. 4000 • B i.SLIDE ISTS i SHALL ORDANE9's1i510TY [[[ PRrcr RECORD OWNER STONEBURY t IN ACCORDANCE NM DIE OTV VOL.6212.PG. \3101 SUBDIVISION 9R[NNANCC. DR.TC T. I TOLL BROS a INC. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTNL•KE,TARRANT COIMTT,TE%45 3 NOTE •010 [ICIER DRIVE BEING A REVISION OF NO PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ACCESS MLNINNEY , T[KAS /1070 iT S.PC TTMVILLE AVENUE FN.MR Sst-BBlS FAA lil{1 B{2-Oi•9 LOTS B Wu IS.BLOCK 2 ANO LOT 13,BLOCK I WALL BE Pf RarROel OF STONE BURY AS RECORDED IN CABINET A.SLIDE 291 T,P R.TC.T 7. NOTE NOTE her AN0064 ACRES OUT OF TIE W q.EAVES SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO S00 M y ALL CWSIWC SIRUCNRE3(II) E artIX SOUMLAKE RESERVES ME R1fl,T TO REQME SELLING A PORTION Cf ABS LOT WITHIN THIS 6 RESIDENTIAL LOTS/I COMMON GREEN MINIMUM FINISH 11.0011 UV/AWNS Owl ANY LOT CONTAINED AI.ITI0N BT METES AND KOMUS I!A V10LATU• PLANNING 9 ENGINEERING 0 ]0 BE Rf MOVYU WITHIN IRIS A00100(1. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SNO9M OF STATE LAW AND(III ORDINANCE AN0ls 4.312 ACRES ORE BASED ON ME MOST CURRENT 1HF0R46 BON AVAILABLE SU°IECT TO SHIMS AND•NNROL01 NG OF OOWOEY a ANDERSON 6 ASSOCIATES.INC. AT ME Mg ME MAI IS FILED ASO YAT N 5UBECT TO UTILITIES AND MALDIMG PERMITS. 9225 VILLAGE CREEK MIfl !MITI ZOO JULY a 1997 EHANIE. MOTIONAL LOTS.0,61.MAN TWY L,OWN, N,If PtI B)1-ORf• PO , T{R Af I001) A Y ALSO INAE N CI 10 HI/WON CRITERIA. P n _.._.—__.___ PAS IBTIIf)1[B SBT( IN'ABINFJ SLIDE RITE P1/ J 1 I. j CABE NO.- 2A 97.OGR K ` 40 i City of Southlake, Texas S STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-065 PROJECT: Development Plan - Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek. Phase II STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Development Plan of Timarron Addition- Wyndsor Creek, Phase II on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, 6B, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Old Carroll Road and East Continental Boulevard. OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District SLAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential and 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Nineteen (19) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Gerald Montague, 1125 Longford Dr., Southlake, in favor. "This seems to be very good use for the land. Would like to see a commitment from Timarron to keep the building restrictions at the Wyndsor Creek level." • Bill Jennings, 1199 E. Continental Blvd., Southlake, undecided. • Pat and James Green, 731 Wyndsor Creek Dr., Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: July 3, 1997; Approved (4-2-1) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) delete requirement#6 (Street"A"must be aligned with either East Perry Circle or West Perry Circle centerlines); 2) adopt revisions presented; 7 3) examine the need for 60' R.O.W. -7k - 1 City of Southlake,Texas S COUNCIL ACTION: July 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing until the July 22, 1997, City Council meeting. July 22, 1997, Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing until the August 5, 1997, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Development Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated June 27, 1997, and Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 18, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated August 1, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-065DP.WPD S • - IC.I 10 A., 6 A, ....1.• :15,I3 Ac . A, Dilly el __3 30.6 Ac /0 3,141 Cfrill.4 02141'1 I• i r57 LAC 301 . 22.11 Ac 30 302 g55 58 r777-T- % 2Al2A10 7,7 2A5 ..... 2k3 2 7:-••••N,.1,\-\ -1!'....--...r.l.' 20 .. / 0i 401/4 • ,i,. .----V:•?4,: ., .4. I i i ..Z Ac ;',ITA- •.. 24i8 r_... .. 28 .-• • '•:-.•:..-.-.:• N.‘„..\. .. 10r:f ,.! ! ,.. :-.2: I . 'N.\:.7‘,••\ cy .... 41 ..-C.. -"- :...1•1"., \ .-N, ' -1,-W-1 AG 1-514zINCI -1Z ..- 21 4c.-- *; x 1 , 1 ...0—*, .., . • Sihr....• • 44 i:: , ......1.- •"' • \*. ' .;•-••• 28 25.3A gill .,:„ ,, ,• . . •4 ., 1) .-• . .'r.r. ,;. " 011-11f5 4 Ac UN I ()MEDI 1.0 W.%...KNI01-17 5,,K. F' . sauf' . (3) a] !s• ! saner A-4111 . i c.:,..z,....)..1 .i ! !. .r.. / \ ! i ! ! I • I j : ...... •. I 1 I I i . ,•" t 7 ,--• ..1 k. Z:•.,‘" I s' * • • ' •••. :.-I\•, ,,i 2C 12C"ii5 2C2A..--. 2C-Ik• il-' " - • I 50.71 Ac ....„.... --:16r-- -1- I_ '-i ! i ,. ,- ..• ,....-___.. • •r • IF & 9° RE ••• ....... . --, • •••aa.......,_i I : E.•".• II '•••• ..ACXS•IWO i•-•••• , i r.r, . _wrier...amine .s. . ,ti ..) 1,..• ...A. - • X , •• tr. • g ++44, L, Tit : A : • : i / ...5:), ,..; . # i # # # # ..... 1A.3 -- / '',, .41.,. . . ••i i :..., < ...... 58i •-, i . iiii ..„•___ _.1 -,.., . A'''. .!•k' '.--1 t. •0.}- - • 1 1" : ..'7‹1 - ...:„. ,,, .-,. • ._4-- ;:„.......,/, ... IA 1 At ,,•:, - --)•-•1-:els - - . ._. \./i . . . •-•-r: i . • . 83 5C1 I.., . • ....-t• . •-.-r- i .-. I:4: • • • ti.. 1 i • _I . . • ' . 1--1 I SAIA 8.1.1 0 • u i i i .i.,.. . .,h ....A... ..,‘NiIIIIMIMAIIIIMIN... 1.0,201 s• 1 ! • - • t I f 6A ••••"4 1 - -A .. ' 1 il.1.11-•:.4-- -1111°11"... WU 1.61•141 1A21 T 6.1 ' IA :• • . -. ••;: 1 k•-•.:-.1-. • . ; --, -011.11.11M ,•,_. 1* rIM--. .s .rc.. ./. .'.' '4. 0 ''' l-r:.• ,_, i i I ;:i.OS.i'iii'e ,A4.1.,...„'•4.:,:.-,.4j-T, .."0)..4U..•..a11l7 1".0...•".. ....'--../'-'•-..•.-..... ....• ... _.,... ..,...,. 4 01 . mmiin1. . C., C7INDI TAALC 7....... A ...:r....;•I: ..."i i:. - • 7...-"....7"7,14. ITT i T----r-r-r--1,--r--71 : T . . . . . . . . . 111 IA _.,f 1 to lei .-....... . , • • • • ! I ! 1 ! i /i I ! • ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . ' f.1...v .K I sr•MmiPtnar ......i .n..us1.11101," . i :1 . . s•r•- ---4 i i i . e • Cgt4;14 17 Ac .s". L.-- _...1.-•+ -.-7.144r• •./k, • , I. i I I .•,,i ti V, - - ; rs. . .--, . • . _, . 1 Jr+ • • .,, - . . . i • • N. '''''' ..... - -L_ 2A3 MA •.--- ..-•-1". - ' i ,. .,--C. . ! r. ! i - .,C!!„:1___ • , 2 • >4 . •- 1 ro ""•:,..k;Nt.,•.,'$ILl'i , . ... ., .... ...., „e e7MINNIIVAIIA.Np.._ - ... • •'..'k . ,-1-1*-- .1 .4•'.-C '. .' ›.. _. .. .., . • ' • •• -..• •, i '•• • ':. / a fz.OH-4-- g - •-** - ...-- •- , _ .._ .% . .,.r,. 23.3 A. 32.83 Ac "••,. a . 4A.66 Ac"-V- *--> -_e ,...,...5Y . . 7111•"' • ? i I' .- ......:.--- • i i 11' • ....i...' , ..., ......._... ,....4 Ac • ....., . . .. .„. .,..... . - 11OLLIHGVI.0,i4,"11141 •..... 6)1;4 \ 7a ,,.-Z- GO • • i -7--•:.: •••• ' • ! i i-; NALL MEDLIN E3AREI = T • .• .• / :.: ,•.- . .. / . ..„. Stfrof7..4- 7 ORS • •• :1^...,....c..‹., --*:... / .... 2.n 2X1 •i••• ._..• .-• .._ (...,_ .s, ''..:....• .1111ompoi•'1••,.114... . . .. , i i s' • .i•4.1k. ; ' .3 .......--.. .• 2 1:: . .::I . . 1 1 iii ./241.- A •". . • •'.-.. . JOH .i 2,N (G . . 1------: ID 18 : 3 - KT A-5f • .. .. .., ail --3 Cbi. 1..... . ,/,•••.--•'••• .. -- 341- • -47(4..... 28.88 Ac 17.16 Ac L i • , .. .... ... .... ....... •_.. ,w , ! .„...,„..... . u ! ,.. v cgr.,..,- HILL .....24-... VI .I i I' ../ OLL• ij ! 9 qk,s,1.rftN 99''.- _ . .. .. ....:...., i 1 •1-ts P A-1100-• 0,4,/,-- .? . •,...,..,---.:. , ..„-- AD OT •••:,.. # : pLAt4f .-• # ..., ...„........„ .:, I' ! 1 W.11. QYENPRTh .-. - irt4 ..... A2A —4 /C....1.—r' --I 1 IA2 1 Stone r 4--4S7 ...-..., 2D 4 • ,- •. 00. .. __ • __. .. TRACT MAP t 1 • 19 -1� o j gi14 - I la . 110Y1197 11Q1 sie q Y , uo TR 6A1 1 18 2 3 4 5 1.0 AC • '4 R b� 17 >R ����� 12 • r/ 1_ CREENN� �» �� IBM A ' 15 fi f��111 ) 16 , 16 0 3 \> C46 • .. A Try Oil 9 9 88 n a0 . 4I 6 12 899 9�� Cofiimon Cre�n 4 3Q �� 1 z �A ® 228 i► ,3 � . JJJ o • 118 y� v, ' ,6� 5.142 O ._ i 38 i • w. ill 4 g� ,S 1 1 IC 37 eoo i •1 40 0l` $1 8 TR 6C e �, IN • 10 ' 774 800 \ aC40, 722 T R 13I ;, GFORD 683 -^. eo.ti 4 • toN 773 04 AC 11 g I 7—;i• q 12 , 36 TR16B 10 TR 6F1 i a a 1 - �I 681 / 2.81 O 1 14 ' " 5 / 3 .18 AC �i ,A I I 11s E. TR 68 s 33- 5.085 A I / , TR 6 TR 6E 1 '0 " 3.744 O 2.0 O I In 723 16QC q 10 sIs 11 - 1242 32 i TR 1A1 / ./ I Mk 15 2.57 O I 15 TINENTAL BLVD .. ,.30 x4 r 94Q II i. I ' 126 11 ,� ,� r 27 24 ; 22 ° 28 „ R 12 29 f � >tid 1 20 19 17 16 7�e �� 727 31 K 28 ; 25 23 2 1 • �� / !:!T" Y 1 TR TR 1 f+ j� 182 "' 1 ADJACENT OWm_ERS 18 C a `'j 1 ' �',°R � 1,, >: _ AND ZONING vl�� 0 ) --,W u nl, ,.0, I 15 8 AC TR 1 B --re--- 8 t 1 a I SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO 3 - 1-2-69 . 2.862 0 t'I. rrn,1meN 1l r , I , •., • ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING # Owner Name Zoning SPIN#9 LAURA MIKLOSKO • 01 MONTAGUE,GERALD PUD#1 02 BAZAR, BRIAN PUD#1 03 KIRST,TIMOTHY&PAULA PUD#1 04 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 05 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 06 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 07 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 08 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 09 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 11 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 12 FIRST BAPT CHURCH/SOUTHLAKE CS 13 BOREN,WILLIAM B&VALORIE L AG 14 OWNER NOT KNOWN PUD#1 15 WRIGHT,JOE L SF-20B 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 17 BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES INC, PUD#1 18 BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES INC, PUD#1 19 JENNINGS, BILLY R ETUX VERA L SF-1A 20 TURNER, KEITH AG • 21 SMITH,AUBERY L ETUX ROSA LE AG 22 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 23 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 24 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 25 PERRY, ROSS MH 26 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 27 METRO POOL CHEMICALS, 11 28 METRO POOL CHEMICALS, 11 29 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 30 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 31 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 32 PIERCE HOMES INC, PUD#1 33 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 34 BORAAS, BRIAN T&KIMBERLY M PUD#1 35 GREENE,JAMES L ETUX PATRICI PUD#1 36 SALVAN, GORDEN F&VIRGINIA A PUD#1 37 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 38 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 39 FEETHAM, NANCY A&FRED A PUD#1 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 • I lk-c tot.p. • .. ..,...____ ., r ..ii,( ..rli• •.r,.?'-'it lobis.v. -.., --, ' r. ) :•r.1 ' i'.11 ''''.-.:•/'\•;*) . MIN=MOM \�ll.Ll 1rrt1 ,���r����.r vl�!vla!�a -�' r .� , /•,�r �- �-•- •4' i�/ r.,.v.. _•r.r r•___• •-..r • N.... I•NI LOOM .t 1 •Y ..\,,t• 'T1.. u , :;.rY� r I(/��� .�•.•.` ..�...,'..'�:.�".-:-...:.�.. ..-��.�...-..+.-.... :...:. 'i0 'Y.rwtt if- ,L'.'�N) 66. r•� • :+H•y 1 , 1i \ ,l1-__.; - `y0Lfl0.3:r (ei 1 /�. `� I L .•��.. .._. r .. r.r_r...w I. •y.l'Gl1 S . '/ f l f, .F-' '*_moo;..•j' • • : 1 r•__ orb...^.�:--.:;-.....,.�._..-. I Di .f . R,.[4l.•ts a in.. jZ•��1�J'u if•IItR'' . •H:! I. /;'�( _ (. ..-...�. . ...... lb•11 ri mnrtr uNRl•r .11.140.2, ? - !■ .,' ! •.i•(•I .au•,,..ILN•Irr IItlWt'T•ntq11: yyK��pooY��` b • ): 'I: ` C •1:., ° r..••.-,_•r•_ - L••N1i %T-- yr • Y ,!T.4.4......t..., �! � '.I.l•4.5 �_m1.._:..:s..' " •--....ter._r•r - .r.r..._. ...=w�.._•.._ • i i ,Cl._ �.�- ,r' ,.r .�f !' 'L�k• YM1.'� 'T j, 'v/,({'� �)=�.' fT L- ` ti -r_....-._._.r I ••- __ •_ .�•.r•r•_ • `+C1 - • • •• t 1..- 1 Ili : ! I'\ '.1•yrt!.{l'•'•.�-i•'�• •♦''� r •t'IC.OT.w r.. ...._-..._ ..-...•�...._•.•.. • • I �� .. ;,. �y� rigid -Y r�F. n` R•e ` ci;�fy~� i�'�,Ai '�Ir.•r••._._.r._ INIMM•r_:•• aur.�frlt.f f¢1 .� c�r. S �' � Qw1$.►711 ,I `) � :, lL y. �I �`" ►:y:�:�::.�_ ▪ :.•�:�:.Lo ' ..f.'..•n'i r`I 17� 1 ' :1 rG ; i, !� { / '�'�g .:+� �!'I/. ▪ ,.•-.-..._••••r/ LI I1 THGin. J1Rf _ ,iY Rt. 1'• I. ! Na �./ / �'�' ..-_r....._._.r sW . •1 r . y'. Lf •l� .(d►, • ' ■ do. 00.o r;i,............_.... . _ -• „ I( '.� •, . ..,. 4.. •'`•t I v` :,.er. 1� 'nfl nwc. I -•.«........._._.r • _..r._ -� --.... • t. r _ I ^1F� • r t' it{f{� ,, i �.i...._�--.:�:�:� 'OfE. /S`Ji .• Ir•�r ' hif �' • �S1%_ � F.• Ei .r .. �"�.91'� •. t. '.�'......-....._.r.. M11 t LOCATION MAP `wa66. '(1 It i..INt 1.. -�f tk•y, : ,I'• '.1i� '�/• ��•r.1•fw osow;;".�+ :.L': ''� 0�76 •1L w ••.., '` I,. • A 1 •. �y '•CiotYoi L P•fL s":L•'y. r - - w.Lv ! �oPt.l• fs ... `. l, s• mcLr- •' !'n• Into "; . I }}.�I` • _i _ �ar •,• •, . . III ,aal�. • ,t..:. -�.� �., OO]•(i 1r" '•1 /r..,y`. •• a w•IwR I a ►.11. • 'i'I . 1^,' \ '1•I� rw ...-.« �....-.._.__ ...___ ''.....A...NO ' 4••• ? •4 J.;T•Yr... '.•Mn 4-'•• -..I'�'i•c-/SO 1, •.1 { . I.ilw. '.J,.:• .T T iI / //1 J 'CI,Y4veV,YN • ,I .-a._.v.r r. . �. t -•.`.7 a __" •_'.' 'a3t-1•.�":�'�-" � _ M rrt tr--.-r_ j! .Rlre .�.�L. -- 7 y a!'" . '. _. .,..u_•__....•_••.••. ._..._._ • �. • �r1•l.V , o' v. . 1•.1...1..-.••` . .r__ �___•r- .al"K. •C u I 1� v..r wD -r � •• •� ••-•w ••� ''',...• :»." •v 1 Si: "ffi •iiT.T� •T a:,\ 17 - ,.� �"T w.yL.l W..7 4'r+t ` +�:7� - r.-.- -•r_L... ... ..... '!',;,leis i I i .«_�\�'`'. ! ILS. ,. ,F - .s '.. 6"-.. -"�j:Ci -•/•• • ./'-'' I lw-O,hT:,t,a,fm, :�� T:II •;�_ .i . l�• I� i./� .fT`1�I1fli �"�'.. `. __ L•NIS ,.� t000ao' '] 1I . j. .1 . %'(`I� .A. -u,,'7. -r. �1.:ot i-, It �. r __ .�.....__._��.'7 J l I.1. • t oa 1, I t / r...r_.-........-.•,..o.e *.eArt•c' • ' .rs •-• Slim •.1-rri • 1 nl II 1:1 ,.'I'. N• r t -tr.- • . _ �--• 7 `' ''yy 9 - I• y. -,ram'.' • t•• ...PN.N....N...MN=O `YYtt• 'S '•`c,- �1•, • 'I )1`'/,y e I T,y��e:1,1.4.. ,--7-t.--.-_•-._ .......,.•.v..-.. .• -�!••.. •• i iJ/• `Y . L., a �. t l i : ,.11 k - ..o _... ._ ....��• lj.} .,w -'C' r. ' •r.,.`.....� ................ L•be0.9• j ( •w io.' t •r `4•\0.. t ` t'' i•!+'\ .li.j4 Rat•.':.' • .• . . 1! ..▪r_.-•..•_•-•.• :, , ....•...,....•.,.._._••...•..._.. (I.lo_+1iI' ^r vt• 4 /•.,% I •i 1.*,./i M I L•Q c :I• ll • lj r�-1 - _. Ir. -. `) 1 ^ '^^ •^ •� ` Y '..'tI '• L•11....•.0• w•r.A'A, .:• i 'l f'' ;r... \ 1 '1 REVISED PRELTNNARY PLAT '_1v__ 2��_�^s_._ t llMll /� E' • • If1 ,.. sy= ^��=�_e__-'�-' _s___! t� w•N r ���ri lw•4 �e (•'�, tr�r 1 -f oYLll .au • ._ f (, • 71MAARON ADDITION I �..:=_4_ i i 1":, .r.•S2 ': I. 1' ♦ . r... e V141AGES �.C,& D .1 • _ ._ ,. .. .. •'��:(Nth .+T •`•. .9r. . ��.. t M »Tw g; • /11ENG A REVISION Of • ": ., .. ... .. - I•, t K' I. t N r4 • •:, /415 y�..�6•17. • .,, 'L:f 'i• TYUNON,PHASE 3.SECTIONS ONE 11 TWO •. • _ ••-a• .. /{jatnts` . ••/ ! ' • :� �f\,I,yt A/' :' ww•�nu[ -t�-�___. \ 1 Ita O • •'Y .I �; -S f' / t0.t ;4`a"CL auT of THE 1 ..� , J.! i ! •• !w , \�!.`•,' ••a"4..ow HALL IEO.N St1RYET.ABSTRACT.N0.103T. Lt'ilp� t F �4 •/ •A� y -\:tea:"•`••• r.ra. NOLLWGSI TH• BAR TT SURVEY.ABSTRACT'NO.TIT. • r•• ,.-.- . .. ,. .• .. i ,�:ytI0t�jftY'o. ,mil l :G� ~ oYoi 4i _ ABSTRACT NO.Sri r. ' L•lOCA/' > . f ��y%(i ., fa 1 )" 04 Mr fttatlrr MEDIAN Mt SURVEY.�T• Ai .-.- .. .- .. • .. .. ) r '• 4� r'. .'t!! (t0, ` 'L I <'I......' ,.....-. L..o.�i .•.w.en n .a ' - f �. . V / `Int\ .• n-.c f ta.+c[...stet CITY OE SOLAN ARE.TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS II r Mte'•nt'1-w-fa03 ••1(� 4. (S ....• w ..- .. - .. .. 8 L,tO '•• .t r 1 A L . •H'!1 • L.t.71• -_-. .. B• „yLfoo+�,N• ^ L-•• '��• `1✓ P flc� 'ii'11� I�' , / -\. F...w,.•d fit corlW. p1.{i ACNEi/261 LOT{/1.COMMON 011EENB • },•If•'1+R;�� ►,ii 1•, �) \ �; •�I• V ,; '! i.. YF•F1.R. OtNER/tr V4LOPERI TaAARRON LAID EORPORAl101/ �# L•.I O.0 a u._a• i �.'•'. `'' N,1 '.• ;// / ! 300 EiApPENTER FREEWAY.SUITE/t25 1 LI•01trtc•fiw-wee ', .• -IRI .�. I' • I I ' l (_ •_/qNG.TEXAS- TSOtii tt R•10t•if'w-fa oo I . ,. •Q. 1 \)j'.`'. J •• /� LS.11 0i4I I-140 O. i ' ` ._ = ,ll. •L.; .`' •. - IARTEN1-337)-•'� - l•,•NbiM't-Ito t4' \ '.• d �+ r; •• �I�' ENU4ERI CARTER a BIIIUSS.MC. ill Lf•{fYMbJw-ft.If \_ -,%�� etYaeN w-JM LI'j.r !)t/�.•, //. Li•f•t•tan'w-•.l 1.' T ` :' \1 IIVVVV//I• .!' LT•arrt1n•w-.1 d' "`�' •` 7 - n•tit.1L f►f0".� \•�..�.1 '31 7fSODE�NBR00c xWWI_u Ti ri0 • :?'::�.,. ...•.-....._ , wa•t�K1.•ntc' Y.T. ;:'.l ..)M'4! \�C.'%I' ,.,_, y�vT'\11, 'In rmw rw tw. .no" lilt i31-OHS Iii Ptz ./t ovs 1. y 4? . o ve; -"Pi?e_-'L-lht! A01i' T' 0 F"., 1 r_r,AA 94 •,' ,i il,.1C,„°. A 1�, -r- o ,J e9 F- `1't+ 1 s d-R t, • City of Southlake,Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY IIIPase No.: ZA 97-065 Review No: Three Date of Review: 8/1/97 Project Name: Development Plan - Timarron Addition Wyndsor Creek Phase II being 15.925 acres located in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Westerra-Timarron L.P. Carter& Burgess, Inc. 7905 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, Texas 75247 Phone : (972) 529-5988 Phone : (214) 638-0145 Fax : (972) 529-5540 Attn: Steve Yetts Fax : (214) 638-0447 Attn: Todd ,Jansen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/28/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to properties located within 200': a. Provide the owner's name, corresponding deed record (volume & page), zoning and Land Use Designation (L.U.D. according to City approved Land Use Map) for Tracts lA and III2A, A-797 located between East Haven Addition and Plum Creek Manor b. Label Lot 2, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition to the north of the site (Carroll Road Baptist Church). Provide plat recording. c. Show the lotting, ROW, etc. for the Approved Preliminary Plat Timarron Addition Village H. 2. Provide a 10' Type B bufferyard along the south line of the property adjacent to Continental Boulevard. 3. The following changes are needed with regard to streets: a. Street "A" must be aligned with either East Perry Circle or West Perry Circle centerlines or be offset a minimum of 125' from both. (P & ZAction 7/03/97: delete) b. The proposed street into the sight exceeds the maximum length (1000') and the maximum number of lots (20) for a cul-de-sac. The proposed length is approximately 1160' and the proposed number of lots is 25. 4. Show and label the 24' Emergency Access Easement extending from this site to Longford Drive as • discussed with city staff. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Westerra-Timarron L.P. and Carter & Burgess, Inc. L:\WP-FILES',RE V\97\97065DP3.W PD • -__ _______ ________ik__________2 1,•r ' , "01,i + 11—,—,-----..,,„4ff J -Ally c, t" 'w rAfi w 1 ,�k Img- itras s'S ' aillr itil* .IM . 111111 I I \� Ilt J — � wm.bS°R." .`�Pv.`7t4°d MsP.S:,,.. ( �t ibi�`aT/�',r-ry_`'� a:.oart frill ( 11 n [ARROLL ROAD n79:. .�31'3 ..�ra:::w:M za C�.•.n�" , �� - • • ( 1 vain i UCTIOMW.ROAD tlO L::.3.zL.:..•. oR ..w nR a It , '1 I I I v ILA w,.Q.PPP"w A OP r.wa f • . .,>., rcr } ; Ill N 1 i S ^---ram CARROLL R0A0 - \ L101 PM(l /S(1S•PUBLC ♦` J L 1`� ,,,�f■1' 4 , e.rlrs•w(cN ...V.e 0 PA r��•R�•• PP R71��r-�•^•—1!nfilairF1E . 1 1 n p , - I ' V OLUME (',l Sal OMp CSC L ••r-+•L•MP.IV PM fill n• r.o." LOCA710N UK, t ; I S '1 =--�R •rw+a•ma..ww rvr n•—r.rwo. �— `' rutLr./stu PLRIC \ I ` I `\`r •r tr ' or} RLLNN en •'EN 1 SP• ,Y40(1*BORON �L•wTPu I naN PI TI I pn r.aw ( 1 ` ' V• [tit A A.. L wr„Ot.aa.•R,w.PT PI PP ' M 2' ' ;�'.+L•WW1.wars,w.R.r.r.RM l[nIo 1 )••'•.�, TNARRONOAloloA' -- .- SBf'1T'N'E LEAP '� SO[Nnu P.rL•wr.s P w.•ar r••rwP..PP CM CAPPID NON Rao rOIM Ram nID50R CREEK ' B ' 213.x I •wavy...w,.w P w•w PI w A PIMP I.w•.• i• 1```"nAR.LK � • , A0. SLOE 1707.' q f , aa� �,� .,,�j • nar ww $ STRICT OW ( CRS CAPPED VCR MOO SIT •; •-i \\ FL AY LIIII 1 t L 2-•D(NLT�RE•� NTIAI s __-_ 1 ■ .. r•oq ARa w'•w+R•.%PPP RR PPP PI uu. UE UTILITY EASEMENT M� \,...,< y,• I..Ya w a.AP.• I r•A ran M•wq DE ORANACE[ISEIENT • \t • 6 0771 I i •� frt n Iy colR.oN + ill=k'.i1e.riLttr.a r:vn�n."•s.•a•. x RAow Lx•t 1 I7 ` % - IRa �OT% i/ ,� a..n.•.rr�. f'R000 SEMEN FENCE \ {, ITft Y A 1 1 Y1 is I I MP PAPM PI 111 t , IT 1 1 .•J.•. � )! t 1 SS ( I IP .I,. wr PA. P. • 1 1 1 1 •.•J.•." 2S }I `� ? 1 „ .'.(.'. IO•It'I' :�,0" / 1 If I r[NITNPCRPsoN/ "..•w,.I w w� PPP R u u P um • •r• u TYARRON AOaTON 1 1 G _ S.Sy,L_—� { , KWIC qS)T.PAGE B17 RYrOSaI CR[T( 'I, 1 1 DR1C1 CAA AL SLOE ITO) 1 • 'I BLOCX K SI . b lOMP P1D NO•If0-11) IRTCr 1 • _ 1 I I ••• ••'•� A'• ' '' BLOCK K ' tl01 HIED USE .• • rw OItA P10 ,1 1 ♦• r SUN K ppyT T-• I , =_� 2! 3 32 33 �' r,a ••. IA PS . P. u u I f--- 1 ��__L:. r'10 a •2 I I •.�•�I w w IMP.. • .., u u 0 1 ••.1••I !1•.Oa a.m. w« Ra w • u u 1 IY •-! C . -• l' '- —.•.o• PAP w w« Is... • .w r A .w .r .• SFREET $.--� q ( !r n(.a.0 .ca s t WPM PIP aPP w re API s,. . u • ,. u 1• _ �'", .1- , we ... _ i __ PPP PP, w « w a. M . •• .. S0 R I,Ti S.`.s I : : •:::1....,Y } „ ', �•� w..,« ,— '(`, ..4. , •.'. 11('.•1•:•I 1� .t ^1 I s So IT If IS .. JCC RIIIGNT l; _ ___ I � z •• a I 1 , K. 6. LOT .2 VOLUR 60)A RICO 21N ,ter.• r w« —a r u w r u •.. 1I • •••:7L(1 'I •'�S-- M .•.r - :- __ ______- ••• K ,•! .L� .( • ( OI[POSI1YT•200 r•wm. woo ma was m"a w a. uI . u u mnuaw Ra • • , TUN WNW USE ..n a ., I., ,• w u . .7✓. ' 'r�(1.1.1.A.4.a.•..... ..:-...:•rL5 ....� - .wn. ..r•s.o.o.. ..M. _ •.n - -- " .1 Poi__.•• •• • •t':II•'..I�.I. ..•YA �w�... ar...w"w - " - -' •- - • i r'.-- __ I I , or soot 125..•• ".7 • I LPOR(7 of eEc..,.,c 1..PIA A:: ,� ppm I .. _ - - - - II I 1 1 I II h I.s.n •tm iarn.ri�n v. /1 _ pop I 1 1 ; ` O 1 1 1 C•Si NAVIN AfUl41Y— tilt,KI•.IGS 1/11 ____ ' 1 1 T IL V0.1RE%1•Q..PAGC E. ' 20KP SC11_— 1 ' I� I •wu.•.wo Pr.r.+.. _ r W r . MP .•. ' ' •) ' ' • .' 2DItD W/• ) II.l •� ( APPROVED rRClroIT0YI R•r I I I I PI. •WORM DEOSITTJtfOEYUIL tt01 MN CCM'TT RCSIX10.. TYAR�lipDTOR 1 17 )J..____• •� , I 1 1 1 a S - S CEVELOPNENT RAN 1 Ti f I *i i 1 I:$1 . ��$1d d i t TIMARRON ADOMON 1 Tf.v E. TIM 1 1� I 1 1!: rA'Y� �� / � WYNDSOR CREEK PHASE II J x•' 10f ��Sc \ _ OUT a m _-J 2OK•Ply 10-01CN t I i i I)) ( a S d" f"fl OBEOIAN R KNIGHT SURVEY.ABSTRACT NO.t99 IIE•WORM `RLxOENnal,1 I I i I I i 5 AR CREEK COWIN NU i �CD J U L 2 8 1997 w 11.E 20.40.Pup 7 015 ••• 1A U.O.LEDW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CITY Or SOUTIILIKE.TARRANT COUNTT,TEXAS Y0'4S' 15.925 ACRES/26 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1.41 11.1r70 L."o ln(asc.,•r.rr.(:w a"s•-snow.. 4 COARAON GREEN LOTS ti.41•1N 0•la,(r••C•l.[S,.•ll• r[.'N(0(NLOr"(N. [fu•rOw,•rr•cao ro r"t suwt.•l, OR)ER/DEVELOIEA.TIES TEARA•TYIRRON L.P. 1. sic:nrwq[s(0.•nrS(ln=S(•00[+1'K•L001 t:r173701 "s. 7905 W.VIRGINA PARKWAY 1IUcn CY,TEXAS 75070 1 .cowl.,V(1, •,N rM•r)r(.s..cn uoc•,t0 10 00.....uo.(o 19121529.5900 FAX 19721521-5540 S. lo„CI•o1•10.r..Ms RA'N!INRCF'0 T"(1C*[lt•"N, ENGINEER.CANTER I BURGESS.INC. (rxAra.s w•C.AC[ovu,r.c p(r(.C.V["•RA•a :zO•c7 w0"1(:i nrua.4,3s0(.,•I LIM.rw•••c,3.Mt.. art 010.1.0.• NM at. an*. 7950 TE DALLAS..TtoomooEXAO OWE.SSl27i7 250 1 r.toot ass..0'WIC sta/OB.0ES 12111658-0145 FAX 12111 654-0117 11!f 1 JULY,1997 1 City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-066 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek, Phase II STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek, Phase II, on property legally described as being approximately 15.925 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 6, b, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6E, and 6F1. This plat proposes twenty-six (26) residential lots and three (3) common greens. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Old Carroll Road and East Continental Boulevard OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. S CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential and 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Nineteen (19) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Connie Montague, 1125 Longford Circle, Southlake, in favor. "There's no better use for this property. No problems that I can see." • Timothy Kirst, 808 Longford Dr., Southlake, opposed. "Street A connects in to Longford Dr. allowing the entry of anyone from Continental. Housing is too dense." P&Z ACTION: July 3, 1997; Approved (5-1-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated June 27, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) delete requirement#11A (Street"A"must be aligned with either East Perry Circle or West Perry Circle centerlines); 2) adopt revisions as presented; 3) R.O.W. dedication be done in an equitable manner, with 50% between adjoining owners along centerline. • COUNCIL ACTION: July 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table until the July 22, 1997 City Council meeting. City of South lake,Texas S July 22, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table until the August 5, 1997, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 27, 1997, and Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated July 18, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated August 1, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-066PP.W PD 0 • CA _7 :Ail 1\GHP r -r,151 10 Ac 6 At ....•I I?.13 Ac I4 SI Ac 011.‘(., AZ" .. , °I NO H°11 Li1/4C '1 MI , 1 7/1'st .,i I'' OCH P i5 At-'' ) •4 11 CIAO' I I 22.11 At G1' 55 5i, .. C2 30 302 i".777-1-77-7-1--r-r.r-r-1-7-. . ., ‘ % tlii• i ii % .% . Y 2W( 2AI lAil) I 2A2 2A5 t, 2A.31 2 ,,,;I" -•-•!%. / •' ‘ ;45A At 4.51B 2A18 ' 3 •01 1 V•...';.--.,4.4" ' ,..••••1:..,.. . .% %Lit_ i ,,,r... -- ,..-:..-_--:•:1 •••:.•k•‘%, !ICI)1/41c i .t. 1 :.• 0. V4 f . 213 ,-/-•'-',.. ....,:i , . \N..,x,,,,,\\ I:h./mi.:Am ..-. ••••4 count cAjt , 2AIAZ i NCI -R -.- 21 Ac.-- 4E1 ..c.. ._ 11...._:.,..‘..X.,•• ..:4ie i i iijil ..' \ .._,.... _.._.i .1 \ ; •,(- -:, -1,-, --Tre-, , - rii.... -N..'' \/110.•..,;.• - i 0 i.illi231 I ; L!\',..:, 28 zioA OBEDI IA W.., KNIGHT SLIMY A-CCIir . "I...., j 1 .1 'te." ,4). -. ..- . . . ''''' . . •. - , Y:4 -' WHrr 5 504K g'c 20A4.. ...\. 1 ., .-----.-.-•-.--. al Is• ! L. •'----, )) •,/I' • 2C 5 2c2Ar_ 50.7s At „', L. _y_.... r,....4. •- . — ------rifv14 ---- :- rili• $ . , .......,..,,,, '-, -.... i .1 ' ..„........-:''. Ok• . --i . • Ac 4 Ac rel<• Aim i i 7 •\, . ... •. ' '', .-, -4.2-; r .. • r-4.4.4., .1, -......_ r-- • ; i ! „ .1.. ..4 ' ! iii ! i ..-• rA, a • - • • .-_, _ . 1 - N'--4.. 1 . .7.!...i• : 1A3 .., 'aes. >•-i- 17.- ' \ ; I ; .;..,.„k,, ......r 74. c. ! ! • •-•.. 4c . .711• • '4-x-i.- \--% Ac ..1, , . . ! ! ! / -- - ... 1.?•'.;°,, -.I" ; -S . i i - 4131 ; 10 , 3 Ac cf.) I- ''")-i-..:4 .-- • • 4-irx i i . . -...4: i-,.. • _ .' 4A - • • . -- i •••- . .- • 4-5-4-1--rii-I-i'I.' ' ' - 8AI 50 5C1 1, i i ' , ,• ' i - • II i_i / 1:: AZA i i •'T---.. - ' i 1 BAIA : , '•••• Chromi.- -; % :1711-1,‘ : r,,' . . ' ILTIE ! •44 ,,-. 6 K; c}. i i ! 1./ . \r. •- IA2•• ..--4; 1 . III / I A 0 % • ' i i l'.1•1Lr - 1.12 ' 6I • tY ,..-.-1-. • /---e„„......-A,..„ • . . . -L-I-../.. 11 .., •. i% • • ' • '.1h.'' ,All -• --- I '1' , ; . -- k-- . H ..__,_, . .tV •2•••...:.-'r.:: - ' 'iii ,,. --F-20-4- z _. •."_. --r;101',.--.. --- wie.4.:„ Ago 1- ' • ii• 6C ' i '0 2:: ii Likel.‘" * e> • 7 .-.... $-.:- "‘ I •k*•••=1434.1.. -...... -1.... -7 rAlir , "1-.•i *-1. 1-"A _. •-. ...,• .... 4 01 AC - .. -alt3it'F. - r ..ilea sal PI . il : _ e.4.6-4,1, .. --'-- ‘1. • - istur,„,,althen • i . --..,.........--.'.--- .\-s-A, i i ! Al 1 1AI 1 • i-- . •-- - _ EAST CCentENTAL MK/ ;- ...' ..,_.....t,JA —. C 36'. '---,.'•..-.•„-• ,1:-_r.-'••-_-.-,,-:.'...-'..,...,_--,.*,--,-._.-20i,-:0'/.„..,-.,..•.-."-.1-i.I„!".,,-,A 7„t.i...i.--,,'i.-.I-il.s!i'.I.i ol i-f i V-Kk.iI;i C.I.i I../•, IoI.II T..Z.,.-.m.7...,1 r•:.t..........F„<.\-4..T.,..%.T. .,I.-.. I.. ik•.ni. n;.7.•,...1i 1-1i•.1 01^.1aiLVIg_'..,''-.1'.•.i•- .-...4.0.dlie.i .1$ac "• fGlr0•N 0t i4R I le-1- - a - c r ; 0 2A3 Ilk ... _ 201 2 , IA 10 • ... . .. , -I -• ; 23.3 At 3Z03 At • - •%, 'AT'0 .)--, -• . /N. . -..-- • ; .. g.oN --1--1 4; v... . ---'1. •-• • - of ' 1 4416 At - • .- •"" i i .1 if• • .4 Ac -) • . .• '-- ' 5--- : • ..... .•- .--' z i • • ' • HoLLIHGaveoe,' . 33 ._ • - i i ! i, ‘, ,--Z--.... Go • • i 7--,:,: ---- . ' . . ,.,...- ... ; NALL MEDLIN I3ARN = T tT—F--- \ ,.. / • ....... .....::, i-:_ ., NI N • •. . r.... -------.....---......, . .. I ‘ • 1 N,.... r••,,f latA, :. --. 2 '- i \ ......... •. • . • JOHr 2iN. -.. . ._ , - . ,E, 18 3 '• - j 3AI 3 Ce. . )-ii 17.16 A< r. i , i . ••• ... .„.' ( .-.. 28.88 Ac : 3X i i 1,--.,-.1.•••• cfz5.E • - • .. - .. .- .. - .i.1 5 .. '.',...,f•-•`‘.:, ,..,,;#•-:•'•:',,. . , ! ' 'A -.-. W.H. Da,\,ENPORT ...,-T..: . _ !,;04...\ _._. 1 IA2 I 526 SERVO' 4-4,12 , ..... •••%,. . --4 • I -- 28 ' •,- ,... . -4 ---i -, :ACR, ---7.s.(i--- ::::.... • • ., ; ./ .., TRACT MAP Alt, • , i 1 10 'I` ?Sh14I. I MI / I r Stf- y S s o 11Pf LQL 1102 p-7313 I 6A1 ' 1.0 AC 0 . its ;it MIII �_ CREENN/ • ". i O •lila= A n 4 5 >` I�J11 ri 616 pi N k 11.88 O 3 \ate ,�0 1 11 6 A� -_-,,I '� K 899 n• o 1 o) 6 >~ 12 q, 1 1r CorSinion Cre`n ~ 39 1 . 3 4 ' Z ,g O 21 ) _~ o.142 O I 1 Y. 37 38 40 2 • 4 �I TR GC I ea �.+ 724 N 10 • __. 800 \ - .: 13 00Nr'F��� '0 n 4� 6pJ �' � i137Z 04AC - � -IT 12 36 TR / 14 16 p 11 1 0 % /R6F/ , .18 AC _ 3t 7 ,3 : :� Lea ( , 71 •�� 1 , I TR 6p 33 5.08s A w I /TR6TR 6E7i. 2L 7I3 6QG / O 2.0 O sn q 10 ; 4 11 - 12 A 32 I TR 1A1 • 5 2.57 0 I 15 - - - - - -INENTAL BLVU „30 ... ;; 26,� I 27 24 ' 22 o x „ 1 29 f � -- 21 20 19 17 16 no ;;� , 31 - _ ; 25 ; � 23 2 j4, • / i t s--1-------i 1 TR TR 1 �� "' 1 ADJACENT OWm_ERS 18 '1 J Di 14 s ��OR ,I .., _ AND ZONING ( , ,,. ( ,. AC TR 113 14�-- $ 11 � is e I SPIN ll�) IAURA MIKI,OtihO 3 �7�6g�� 2.t367 O T.I. „r rmn(Ori ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING # Owner Name Zoning • SPIN#9 LAURA MIKLOSKO 01 MONTAGUE,GERALD PUD#1 02 BAZAR, BRIAN PUD#1 03 KIRST,TIMOTHY&PAULA PUD#1 04 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 05 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 06 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 07 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 08 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 09 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 11 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 12 FIRST BAPT CHURCH/SOUTHLAKE CS 13 BOREN,WILLIAM B&VALORIE L AG 14 OWNER NOT KNOWN PUD#1 15 WRIGHT,JOE L SF-20B 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 17 BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES INC, PUD#1 18 BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES INC, PUD#1 19 JENNINGS, BILLY R ETUX VERA L SF-1A 20 TURNER, KEITH AG fa 21 SMITH,AUBERY L ETUX ROSA LE AG 22 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 23 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 24 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 25 PERRY, ROSS MH 26 TIMARRON LAND CORP, MH 27 METRO POOL CHEMICALS, 11 28 METRO POOL CHEMICALS, 11 29 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 30 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 31 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 32 PIERCE HOMES INC, PUD#1 33 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 34 BORAAS, BRIAN T&KIMBERLY M PUD#1 35 GREENE,JAMES L ETUX PATRICI PUD#1 36 SALVAN,GORDEN F&VIRGINIA A PUD#1 37 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 38 TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOC INC, PUD#1 39 FEETHAM, NANCY A&FRED A PUD#1 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP, PUD#1 0 tGtND` :Y;. ,.�. its 1 •.1� ,' .74 kt�` � " .�, •...t .i _ .(:' ,�. u\�. .w..r.. • �' � .' »vlit\... •� : ..__..-..•••.•.,-�..__..__--... .... ._•...mow ' MNN rrN wrtt • 1 1 I j \• .•1:t.. tr. + ltl V`-`� ,� ,..t r/� (•1 't_ ^x} • ^I 1 �.•�r...•..•..r....S_,...,_. �-� w• r 7rrwn i "7 a .$I A1--._. hC)./ ,/Y� /.' 1`�•,r•. 1\ .._ Sneer w.t CrOre IA.t 'ot• • ?) A /6' Lawat - J B I .I'i/• f, 4 1.'i•-r•rye/ p -�v...• �'i r• `::�� ':" :: —, _....._..�•r._ r n ri.p.m t.N..1M .t•wO..7 _ 1 alt. •F fw e'.� l f f'' ,...���y�/,I•.,`c.,•..; -•.. •( =,:,.- •— -,----,-.--- • .�r...r.�._.- .i•tY I.04.....aN.11r 1.1WNI iT b ` p( 1/�i 4�►�- �C --..�'i.1 \'Trf.1(,I.S -•_.y-�� - ••-T• r_+..�. T•rw_r-.. w=.-.+r`•.._ • • r l- - �, .r-' 'j- 1�.f•l .�� '114�^'�81'1 ' � ji�lr� } " OJJt.ti~rww r�'� f▪ Br l}'ntr...:....._.._ r ~ .•..•_•.-r_.�._-r... • � 1 L Win' y' Or 41L) ' **Ili •!.7 V nap�r`�••• 1 Imo.—._...._.._ ......�.•.._•..... .� • 1�^ . .� 1 ifr •erg a" ,!Fw' `�........•._.N.. ..,..,.•--_..�-r._ 0.8:7 i;'u'°°,'i/. . _ l•;\ 11f; t':,r 'd c,„ . bi'�t N! �'/ f C rI r• .d_..:�.�..._ 111611,41L L.Bwla _ i�� II 7 is 4 • / '▪ l�l•)/ `..•._._•--r l.; • ■BL7�T2u I' •Q � i- ''- �`' fir ',}�'. �. ' g.•�_ � : r,. , ,, .,,.(r1W_-.._.�:=:: • .. ....._-ter 1 . tit • tA -, n e LaAitaN MAP tpn t��� +1 li. I 1 }� : `i4•l: \� i�1�t, �7'fr.. I 33 .•,.. . .... ...... J.. Ail; ..ii.11 :. • *,.:op 1 • �L;ti.tt��aope�• N .r.•..: -_. �6= —TM-- rSw 1 • +1 t, • 1 {io/Ieoe p/\` N M — �.•••_._�_•.. :..... 6 W.W.I) I PopIWN • w•e r r v \\ .`. \ wee*" , ` • o HbprI,)r `,'�•r1, ,1., ,•; ...__-___ _J I:, 4-. .� I t o . \4 '- • 1. 'ImGI• 1 f e-2.: -;.• T•_-•• ~••••- may i'�+•w^r t•,7 _d— i:f1 ' • ,.Iww �i PO4' 1 p,V a4• • -, ',��• �Y'`• • 1 ^LJ / ..�• f w.t ra+rr,u.r 1 ==."fir. .� ••��••_••..•--+ N Ni 4%-t- r4t�. �..�._ • 1ra„-•..T.�•-,•r...•..•M.,r-r A t.x Yin y "'-3ESoi'3'T .w ■c — •irbu .w�k1�.L i+utt A.ra tens17. .o... ..._...r F wee w :',•p M.r S•: 'f!:n. • 1 �•.�}a, ' 4'±. ...vL.' Y r • 1\ .•.. .. .... :I ill '''?'' -•� bCP �� •'•1►• 1 k ,21. - I'-rr T•• ,a All �� ;w : I� -\,4• {..• --- _. ._ 1.•I142.11 1:te0A00 I e, /• !I.j_.• A _k ..{ I l�f \ i'.. •.17:. .• ._._- r L.Itt s' A. .,�,• • ;l^ t -A- 4 _" '1 t- •.1'�; , " "w •• y .11—•} {' • -•--___----- :::. ...-•_..•r•.••_............. Tf ttiS s ot r t •. ► �+ :!I • •,..' ` �(ir,��'�• .? " _ `!j;__ woe ... �.r......_..r-._ w-r•r,,.•w_.r.r._ L•tft \^`L •, '■yfr- 11 ' •.'/ , / Y., N 1,M0 wv�•••w•�-r•r �N, MM....r.+•••r_.r,.w-w•s 1 rrmlYalNummali.1rNN=to j, a ' .y • jii A ..''-i• 1' I ••I /•• 1\J.p�o.r.V _ •. _ _ •.r. •rrr,a w.w_w_ rtl't1Yttil•wAI H t.1 n .� .•+ 'M 1 1 ,1•I. B \k.'• .1%. ,.�/11++.Ti� -� �Y.I r.n.-r.rr r.--`_.•}• �....•.••., ••g•••,17 • \•I I I . + 4. • CCtt •r, 1,T .T'• III ('• ...._- =__.. -r.�••r • • ..............-.•..••••.. .1..•..-•.. R:lua' . \ _ .rt• I - " . .4_1G \1' i .'1. • {i: ,, :a. I .,.�.--....•.•..._ .. --.—•'_•^,....•..•._-• L•ioo 1� I • -w E��\. ra .`�t ^C' 1. �. - 'I '1 •.._._._ NV .1** .-•- '' : r•rii:, • w .-_ `.. tt.. �_ -m- ( /Y 11. SYI •r IIWVGDN L.No CAAI.'1r.y•4 f.' .i LF,� I -\ •t. .- ` t . 1..p0 t0 1 • ( •�� I REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT I, • ti_ `s,` _sue. 1 , •gip 't4741;V.V.•w•,•. .y 2 r 1- t., ..14.:.., 1 -swso s.wedi TIMAARON ADDRION ' ,� --i_9'_t-_-t_.-__-Mt )`ypp'.5,: r�' . •! i1S '..•''iddl'b�w,,.,,\ f, Y �'`�L VILLAGES (1 P,C,k 0 _ ti ei w • �i -.• w- i •. .. �._.i i •y. `b • . ° i.t.+.' ��� ICING A REVISION OF•a• \-' �'y-eou T �' - r11'�pt AI .,l- �:'F 1 `ice Tt1ARR01l PHASE SECTIONS OW& TWO ' �' .,- •-ie .. . •. • I '(' 1 '1. 1 • .: , .1%. \'''' i ' ,°9%...'1A'•• ` HALL LED�N SURVEY,ABSTRACT.40.037. �«., " i.le.il ws 1 If. ,d•'•�- ,• ,A1, .rr 0 •, •t- •.. w•a HOLLINGSW ITH a BARNETT SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.191• • 91 t `••• ....� .•.. • .• re .r . •'9 i 1 `! o. •� -Fr. , `ww% W 01' _ OBEOWI RICNIGHT SURVCT,ABSTRACT HO.$ • oc s- i f y-•- 'i. u } oo G1C-HtcfTdf;— «INC yy too{ <+.. +«-• l• .i.•••[A tore r.•nsu. CITY Of SOU111LAXE'TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS .. .. .. '. Vv r 1. ':'�+'ri'UA` w ',+"." wtorty''a so00 lint, W No-�' rr :rr +11.t _A c i •te-tT tu.it' S . .. ._• .. ,p00•,•L•.`„`.i I • i:� • I `•: t. qy, i1 r 1. / .\, 2..anu•N tit oW.ts.aN gLti AGREt/261 IOTBrM COMMON OREEN6 _. ... _ .. . _. .. '"'• >;:};;�r t' .y - �:'�1; :� f %� i Witr.i. owNER/1�[vpLOPEw TUARRON LAw tORPauTIOH lwt Oil. ..i;''<1jpa' r, � ' '� \' �;,'1. Y� I;�:.' l00 ECARPENTER HREEBAT,SUITE 1425 u••teu'.iw-woo �a\\ I' •./IYING•7EXAS 15092 Lt•wppbYl.'Y-SODS t,�' � I� .••� Ys••J�yy�•1 ../ l _ ..I 12N1791-7313.• L.•9U01411 I4AT): � ..•- • >. ! dr / \�yL,, l '. •' ENGDEER1 CARTER► BURGESS.NC. ',t} Li�•SertiU'w-.t H, .__ — ryt'to\ta'•• 1NG f•tl `. / ; 7950 EIYBROpc DRIVE,SUITE 250 i Li•rtt•n'I.'w-11 tl' l.. I A OALLAS.TEXAS 13247 !. a , ...__, \w•n.a' -�. ,.;,1,,, ..1 st'PiJO�A�E_. ..•i' - -\11.• eat t[w.a .w coon r.t (2/4)146-0145 • Pi‹ v t oU s L•'( 4•PPR o Ver l?R�. Z--tAt/NCAW -r 0 - ',..t r._e7M PA SS t,3C , .4 t`�o�:Tt o 1,1 O F ` rt-t i s R�•4 J Er _ • City of Southiake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 97-066 Review No: Three Date of Review: 8/1/97 Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Addition Wvndsor Creek Phase II being 15.925 acres located in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No, 899 APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Westerra-Timarron L.P. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7905 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, Texas 75247 Phone : (972) 529-5988 Phone : (214) 638-0145 Fax : (972) 529-5540 Attn.: Steve Yetts Fax : (214) 638-0447 Attn.: Todd Jansen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/28/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT.787. 1. Must tie P.O.B. to survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner. The following changes are needed with regard to properties located within 200': a. Provide the owner's name, corresponding deed record (volume&page)and zoning for Tracts 1 A and 2A, A-797 located between East Haven Addition and Plum Creek Manor b. Show lotting, ROW, etc. for the Approved Preliminary Plat Timarron Addition Village H. c. Label Lot 2, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition to the north of the site (Carroll Road Baptist Church). Provide plat recording. 3. The following changes are needed with regard to existing easements adjacent to the site: a. Label the 5' U.E. on Lot 2 of the O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. b. Label all adjacent drainage easements. 4. Provide easement for water, sewer and/or drainage in compliance with plans as approved by the City Public Works Department. 5. The following changes are needed with regard to streets: a. Label all centerline curve radii and approximate tangent lengths. b. Street "A" must be aligned with either East Perry Circle or West Perry Circle centerlines or be offset a minimum of 125' from both. (P& ZAction 7/03/97: delete) City of Southlake,Texas c. The proposed street into the site exceeds the maximum length (1000') and the maximum • number of lots (20) for a cul-de-sac. The proposed length is approximately 1160' and the proposed number of lots is 25. 6. Show and label the 24' Emergency Access Easement extending from this site to Longford Drive as discussed with city staff. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, park dedication requirements, off-site sewer extensions, and any required off-site drainage easements. 110 Denotes Informational Comment cc: Westerra Timarron, Inc. Carter& Burgess, Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97066PP3.WPD r,A • L661'AYN Iles 1110.9C9/VIZ/X11 Se10.9C9lea) tiel:'..l:,.t..)Co.Ie.3.3.... !1{{ WSJ S1%31'S11110 ..Arc c.,t a,)...-..wo:o,.ot-a. 11 :NW913 3oer. wM1.Y ))eo '.it.:e:t:•...r.,...S)tr�'•..,.13Si.A.,),lo MOorw.•w Y.'t OS2 31111S'3n1tl0 100119n13 0561 ,.27.%rfel5 t i.L...•.wan..).w tal.m 1 ')q'$SMtlnB 9 tl31tle)I233NION3 ..tn.rri::.c: .)')s;.., ..,..,,.,.cs.na3 t..:n.'t OPSS•62S IZ16)1r1 996S-6ZS IZ161 - :t,Inu a,•:.:1n:m:II:..t+)A 1=ii aarn"...toii I OLOSL S.131'A3W4010n 't,:q)A,.+l'itlJb)n•.ta.,a•)w t.,•.nwI.,uw.»•nt: [ Arlltled YINYJNIn 11 XO61 'd'1 NOtltlr J1-11131531•13•1013n30/113NY0 ".1w1.1}. o as)e.tetwal•ent. 1+1r:17,3:i..Y.:�+.. I1et.)et1]t 0.w^Y.1 lb'i S101 N33110 NOM10)1 t...t:tte...SAX�x-r..>tso Y,3S3:a:±=i aotxl1 Ili 510113UN3d53Y 9Z/S3tl)7 SZ6•S1 (,II �1, �/y� Cr. 53131'A1NI10) 1N.tltlT1'313111n05 10 All) 11"1 1111N70S3Y 110104 main,. Ilii HMV }D-09 dL'0 2 p 669'ON 1)etl1SB.A3ntlnS 1NMN1 1 N310390 3Ni N. - —i I -• si _• y}p.i�jV.l_.__. % ,I I1 j! I o °II 14 '' I\\I(f I II �1, / f 1 .*31011 1 r 1 ii 31110inn �� -t./ .4, Y' ��// ' ! r`� I , i I'I`V II /}'\1 �� � 1• �)tm ! ill II 312Y111 )111380 tl040NAM I1;'_� i• ..� -"eef., --,Yil ( l I'\,I i I +1 [I 1 i Is f NOLL30OY NOYWWLL — / )i \ 0 4v- i '/I nill ./1 I tdf i i i ) I� I ) :I I I 1 lad AtlrNY.,3tld "-,-- / _ (. r •^,/-_ i/ , 1 1 °� ! i . tn..w1u 10. e. Ii011100r-Neva j I' J-'` -ilrfs,o,ss Al 7a Me - sill f•1 n,w w - u. ti .. •+e1 en „„ L Nl dr I \ r11M f7�4' -'IYq 1'0)Y ,✓ t U!f'0 mil 1 I ,{-11� 1 wuar as r W•.m I-. 1/l6 Y / Y1. 1.19C tk, I_ - - - .. e •10.• sir wn,..., �/1 + I I1. \.i- '/2 -j.n.401i: � , 1 1 iii. M i1 •Ymr s.1 r a e0 1Nq y 1 •• . r.7f�iil��IIt1� �! IGI��!`vLr 104,,,.,+ e w :�•�� ti '^vim"-' ..�•:= :m '.J :•, �� + � n o w m ..0 ' n. wsr,ru.• 7tn 031n l _I ',,/ as • ...nu.�tst��� 1'1nu"13 •, .. 1• 1 ma.r 1.... 1 w... ao:ex a + / ') i?1i>a[?� �i�if` r' i�il r`[I � i n n e n .. w r sir ..... ,Olaa �1 �• • ss,.e1% • 91 1 N;ill a Q,t:11• r•.• %. ,. .n a ., .e e.w•r.. ..w1•• ro z 4,1101°11 X i : 41 S Nr»" , 1 : = 1 : .. .. 1, r w r w.+m• w Ia.. + • m n I w. 1. w .+o w r r. rem I 1 ,1 tl,� V 3t :II I oe. e, , n .. . w r I.. ww11., O13 / 1 7 1 _ Ifil e 'i, .. - j 11,4 ,n .n a u. .. . m�r .n .... Ss!Ol alM pnlp7'I'II .u,1 ` _ yipI 1 ' 1 ,. n I w. ,. ..mow »., •n a 1w,w.••. .Nsos.3 ssv>r.sns.l0.S1 i II :t, . . •_ \\ -• .0 7 �IIy i1 ►�.j� 19(1 '+{ - I,. , w •. . »r •• •I .OY.. /-I'Y\��\`` `; ``, =�I 'aa' ;t AN,,Or I11 !1 k 0....._ r.▪ .. 1 .s . xmr sr r •n 1 w.a,r... 35n MN NYII 91 71 .lB .t • . 1Old. rY10Y1•0111 r a.1 r Vol 1 , t9 `\ •.i0 ��,.I ;; .1 119 a3cz (y1 m r• , w. .. • ...�. s� C.1.01.1 ON 0v.03OZ ,-: r l` \1 I - 1)0113 f ':1 t.--t1 1. ..�S'N!V.7 ... 1w.v 1w 131tl0dir __ C 1 n . o . . .o•. sir .n eral.... U1,3]q'l Ltzl 31nt00 // _—.. P -� '3,, „,I, ' • •,1 110311i/°111 1. r, 1 n .. w „ter mw ell ,n ,wys.••.,r NOStl71310 N,W3N _� _ 'ice r�, 1.0.6)7$ 1+ .. s w r.w anew :: w,ern .r a w....• em•. /,r ��;�'-. ,27 s �I\ SC t, 01/ OW S,1 3�inn, t 1'I /I ' i new w r.w•..wn 'f • /\ i Y ' - YJN71 4311125 OOOa.9 ___- /.1 1.1 71 11•61 \ I \ _ , / �'• • 311t orwtr,9 >o «. � :"1�':'Bd:°Gd"�7:':K°3 ,{ /:j� Jj '� 8— � °) \ i�(:��9s'I� '` 1 • o'c V. t 1N7n3Se33]eNnYO 3a 1em•v1m •mt FFtt''// I / �•-14-. \fi\ "�= 1'tulrl� /s .�I ww[•S0. S. A t �, 1N31xe7 snsin 3n In,m1 1••.w.•en r•In. - = - •-S3u_'1K4. Z' n I I it. I,1 �0001J -�:_ i• �`- 7011I10 133Y1$ 1 ' , y^.. -=^�•,7 ,x ooa Nor o3aa.] sal ~1�R..:3 B.E;.7m,k�..1 4 1 110 .tr. �sr L' - 1 OI101 00Y nON O1Yde3 H] •, n..I'•a. . �� I,,. , •I. - N011001 HOYY1n • _ -__.{ r1.•,.e,v':'.;µ%: 1'111N705 Nnl r %4 I (1- 1 I ,-_( \,,,,,,....111_` , a39n 1 Mona.n,.1 Eau v • 1 , I j I I I _�c--- •t;-------- \ f� m.�.t.t..1. ZZ(( 3 -8end nnlyy a .I�' s ,••// -1i, ' _L-__ „ 1\ l' 1` , 1 Nt -fi I AIM N011r)Ol •. w'•e.vrm.3.1.•». /..�I�/ ?/ i3Kiv'1�jy���1�//lti '!�' l ----- - wi �_ �pl f 1 + /,tt •.Tr •I,-j'1- jl I ,. .I II w n.1n a urrm•,nw.w. ,'`j •1 I /b)g•/rst'�1n�i'/1 ' , 1 i!, t '' n. �� , r t r -�- N71flq l 111 1 11 m.m.,.1.1.w. 3,tene n3s/>lend ) -"1!t.("" 1 ' ''. , 1• tl , 1 1. , no3oz p, - r 1.. �' ry _ s 1 1.1 ! .oa.. rs r an w.r.rm nm.w• OS1 30eY 110ei1 3Y,tgt •,/ i -1 /_.• T --•-.^ :.tl _ _ �'I r i . . WO sow,an .w,.w'1.i1a1AnerVe LI N)inel 1L,Ie1 11• I I I y I _ I I11.-i-I 1, /I i+ri' 't OeoY 1toYYe7 I , / 41r oa F• .r..u".'�J� Ya,t:� "t:.w"J.3Y:eol.° _ II tI - _ /, �j''-t--;i L I I Ilj1 tL-_ tt) + 3a`�`' •,' i•/1II ' • s -11 ' "11(1.1. 14=1• .L-4,,:l: 11 .6111 • • 0 0 a • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • July 17, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-Z, Revisions to Service Station Provisions The City Council passed Resolution No. 97-20 on March 18, 1997 declaring a 120-day moratorium on the approval of new service stations along the F.M. 1709 corridor. [The moratorium has since been extended until September 28, 1997.] As you may recall, this moratorium was brought forth due to a"rush of inquiries" for these facilities along the F.M. 1709 corridor. The major concerns raised were: • potential threat to the city's neighborhood preservations efforts along this corridor; • public safety (i.e. crime prevention and control); • adjacency to residential properties (lights, buffering, setbacks, property values); and • traffic, parking, circulation on and off the site. The moratorium exempted applications already received bythe cityprior to the passage of the resolution and P g any future applications requesting rezoning to planned unit development. his matter was referred to the Service Station Workgroup for their review and recommendations. They an their discussions on April 10 and made a final recommendation on June 5. The workgroup, consisting Councilpersons Pamela Muller and Scott Martin, Commissioners Joe Wright and Debra Edmondson, City Manager Curtis E. Hawk, and Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy, met four (4) times during the 2-month period. The workgroup established the following review objectives: • determine the appropriate locations for these facilities [i.e., intersections (with or without signalization) or mid-block]; • determine the appropriate approval process and zoning district(s); • establish architectural design standards / development regulations to address: minimum lot size, roof design and articulation, ancillary uses (i.e., car washes, kiosks), impervious coverage, traffic flows and circulation patterns, latest trend of partnering with food companies, and hours of operation. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of Ordinance No. 480-Z as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 17, 1997. The vote of approval was (7-0) with a further recommendation that certain residential adjacency issues, such as: noise attenuation, lighting, and residential-style roof design be addressed in either amendments to the corridor overlay zone or neighborhood preservation ordinance draft as well as an amendment to the sign ordinance defining readerboard signs needed by service stations for "replaceable pricing." Please"Itnote that the City Attorney has raised concern about the defensibility of restricting the hours of eration of the car wash unless a rational basis can be documented and reasonable hours can be determined r requiring such a restriction. The attorney offered an alternative means of accomplishing the same protection without drawing a challenge of interfering with interstate commerce. He suggested reviewing alternative methods of reducing the impact of these uses; such as, the placement of berms, additional planting q'R -1 A materials, and fencing where additional protections were warranted. Utilizing these methods rather than g hours of operation might avoid due process and interstate commerce challenges.•trictin The City Attorney further recommended that the issues of residential-style roof design,additional landscaping requirements, and exterior finishes of building and structure facades be applied to all uses, either along a particular corridor, in all corridors, or where any use is adjacent to residential properties, rather than singling out this one particular use. As he explained, to restrict the development of service stations more than any other commercial, office or retail use runs the risk of drawing equal protection and rational basis challenges under the law. The Commission understood the attorney's concern noted above and hence the reason for their further recommendation noted in their motion of approval. However,because of the uncertainty of the timing of the recommended ordinance amendments, they felt compelled to leave in the questionable provisions for now in order to protect and preserve the integrity of developing corridors. Should you have questions regarding any of the above, please call me at (817) 481-5581, extension 743. Yll KPG enc Service Station Location/Thoroughfare Designations/ Signalized Intersections Exhibit S 0 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Z-MEM.3 BSI--- A Existing Service Station Locations 111114 Corridor Magic Mike's @ SEC N. White Chapel (will be taken in Hwy. 114 expansion) 7-Eleven @ SWC N. Carroll Avenue Texas Petro @ NWC N. Kimball (approved, but not constructed) Circle E (Texaco) Convenience Store @ NEC N. Kimball Chevron @ SWC @ Bluebonnet (will be taken in Hwy. 114 expansion) Gun Barrel @ NWC Shady Lane 1709 Corridor Justin's Grocery @ SEC Pearson Lane Lucky Lady @ NWC Randol Mill Southlake Food Mart (Texaco) @ NEC Randol Mill Tetco (Mobil) Station @ NEC Peytonville Ave. (approved, but not constructed) Magic Mike's (Texaco) @ NWC N. White Chapel Chevron @ Village Center Drive (proposal under consideration) 1938 Corridor Couch's Grocery (between Southlake Marketplace and North Davis Business Park) Others "kick's Country Store SE of Florence on Randol Mill ates Corner @ NWC of Dove Road @ N. Kimball Thoroughfare Designations Arterials Collectors * Pearson (North of 1709) * Pearson(South of 1709) * Davis/Randol Mill * Peytonville (N. of Southridge Lakes commercial. * Peytonville (High School - Southridge Lakes & South of High School commercial) t Shady Oaks * White Chapel Blvd. t Byron Nelson Parkway * Carroll Ave. * Kimball Ave. * Existing Signalized Intersections along F.M. 1709 designated as Arterials or Collectors t Proposed Signalized Intersections along F.M. 1709 designated as Arterials or Collectors Note that the following roadways are not shown on the Thoroughfare Plan; however,they either have an existing traffic signal or they are being proposed as a signalized intersection: Village Center Drive (existing), Town Center (proposed), Miron Drive (proposed), Commerce Street(proposed). •:\W P-FILES\PROJECTS\WORKGRP\SERV_STA.3 • ORDINANCE NO. 480-Z AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480,AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS; DELETING GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS AS PERMITTED USES AND SPECIFIC USES FROM CERTAIN DISTRICTS ; AMENDING THE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS SECTION BY ADDING GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS AND RELATED ANCILLARY USES; ADDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS FOR GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM;PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the • Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the city has adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the city; and WHEREAS, the city council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests of the city to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents by amending Ordinance No. 480 as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the city council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: • L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF RZONING1480Z-3.ORD 1 A SSECTION 1. The following subsections of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, shall hereby be amended by deleting them in their entirety: Section 20.2 (5), Permitted Uses, "C-1"Neighborhood Commercial District; Section 21.2 (21), Permitted Uses, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, and Section 45.1 (15), "Specific Use Permits" and the following portion of Subsection 21.5 (f),Floor Area,"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District Development Regulations: "Excepted from the minimum floor area requirements of this provision are small grocery or convenience stores, and car washing structures, that operate in conjunction with filling stations. The minimum size of a separate building housing such a store or car wash facility shall be five hundred(500) square feet. It is envisioned that such stores will be surrounded by a larger canopy covering for the gasoline pumps, and that the total area under roof shall be more than two thousand(2,000) square feet." SECTION 2. • Section 45.1 (40),"Specific Use Permits"of Ordinance No.480,as amended, is hereby added to read as follows: "40. Gasoline service station when operated with or C-3 without convenience store, car wash, and other related ancillary uses, subject to the require- ments set forth in Section 45.10 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. Section 45.10, "SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS WHEN OPERATED WITH OR WITHOUT CONVENIENCE STORES, CAR WASHES, AND OTHER RELATED ANCILLARY USES," of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby added to read as follows: In addition to the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations and the underlying zoning district • regulations, gasoline service stations/filling stations (with or without a convenience store, car wash and other related ancillary uses) shall meet the following requirements prior to L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Z-3.ORD 7 issuance of a building permit: (In the event that there are conflicting requirements, the more • stringent regulations shall apply.) General Criteria • All gasoline service stations on the F.M. 1709 corridor shall be located at signalized arterial intersections as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan. This requirement is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading. • All gasoline service stations on the S.H. 114 corridor may be located at either intersections or mid-block. Development Regulations Residential Gasoline pumps, pump islands, canopies, or car washes, where adjacent Adjacency: to property zoned as single-family residential, shall maintain a minimum setback of at least one hundred twenty-five (125') feet. The hours of any carwash operation may be limited when located adjacent to residentially-zoned property. No dumpster shall be placed within 50' of residentially zoned property. Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall be forty thousand (40,000) square feet,but the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend and the City Council may require additional lot area to ensure proper internal traffic circulation and appropriate stacking on site. Building F.M. 1709 Corridor: All service station convenience stores, pump Design: canopies and car washes constructed on the F.M.1709 corridor shall be constructed with a gabled or hipped roof with a minimum pitch of 4:12 in order to maintain the residential nature of that corridor. All Locations (including F.M. 1709 Corridor): Articulation: Service station convenience stores shall meet the articulation requirements of the Corridor Overlay Zone. Pump canopies and freestanding car washes shall be exempted from the articulation requirement. Building Materials: All exterior facades of the convenience store, canopy columns, and car wash shall be constructed of the same material. No concrete block shall be permitted. Floor Area: The minimum floor area of a convenience store shall be 2,000 • square feet with each lease space within the convenience store building being a minimum of 500 square feet. Each freestanding car wash or other ancillary L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Z-3.ORD 3 • building shall have a minimum floor area of 500 square feet. Site Design: Lighting: A system to light the area of the gas pumps shall be provided. Such lighting shall be designated to light the pump area adequately without becoming an unnecessary nuisance to traffic or to owners of nearby property. Outside Display of Goods: Outside display of goods shall be prohibited. SECTION 4. Section 35.6 (b)(5)(d): "Off-Street Parking, Personal Service and Retail Uses;" of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, shall hereby be amended to read as follows: "Gasoline Service Stations: - without a convenience store: Minimum of 6 spaces; - with a convenience store: Minimum of 1 space for each 200 s.f. of floor area; - with convenience store and sit down dining area: Minimum of 1 space for each 200 s.f. of retail floor area + the greater of 1 space per each 3 seats under the maximum seating arrangement or 1 space per each 100 square feet of floor area devoted to dining; • - with convenience store and drive-through restaurant (or other service window): Minimum of 1 space for each 200 s.f. of floor area+ 3 stacking spaces per service window. - with a self-service car wash is added to any of the above combinations, a minimum of 3 stacking spaces shall be provided. Each stacking space on the site shall be nine feet by twenty-two feet(9' x 22'), shall be located in a sequential arrangement to the service area, and shall not be on any street rights-of-way or common access easement, any necessary maneuvering area for parking spaces, within the general traffic circulation pattern of a parking lot, or in a designated fire lane. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. • It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONTNG\4SOZ-3.ORD 4 • sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. • SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning yard regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than • the production thereof. L:ICTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Z-3.ORD 5 • SECTION 10. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. • PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 1997. L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONINGW80Z-3.ORD 6 • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • L\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT1ZONING\480ZJ.ORD 7 City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-090 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-250 Rezoning/Higgins Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property described as being approximately 3.32 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. LOCATION: 1496 E. Dove Street approximately 120' west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove Avenue and East Dove Street. OWNER: Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins APPLICANT: Area Surveying, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District • REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single FamilyResidential District g LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • W.P. Hogue, 1507 E. Dove Rd., Southlake, in favor. "I am in favor of. . ." • J.D. Davis, 1363 E. Dove Road, Southlake, in favor. • Dorothy Rockenbaugh, 1901 N. Carroll, Southlake, in favor. "Miss Lizzie" is probably our oldest citizen. She should be allowed to do whatever she likes with her property." P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by • Staff. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-090Z.W PD I S Alii tilli teal SAIL ‘. ot EE . , ciiii—. *IP on ' - I 1 , /mg 44..11, tili' : a.,.,,,, , s ii,,,,.. . ,:.. _.... _. 0,c,.,....... .... vii.c.1#4 ... ..., 1 6P r„ ,Isigiollk jib. PPP ild litrie•-iiiim I 1J t I IQ__ _P Ai 11 11 Li Is — '111.10X.',111. ' Ill-- 1 • _4___ 4 dr. :..,,,,I. .10, Ertl . *. - -4s W. 11741.0 . Rfaiiiiiik .1,144.. 1....*4 sOG ohs / •rc_. L ,T • _/ p E % saloon . BERALL CP new sr __I \E . . _ / ill , 411 )1 1104 r 1 hti Irt-P -r•C , san j ....ul 0,,yri 1 - -a:A*1p. _ _jitik\lo -4100.r- 401 O. • • 1 10. . ; I . 0 -----Wr .,„,------, , • N ' 1 P te TRACT MAP • ptgf- .... / 7---177 -(1-75- I ( \ I A t I � a THE OAKS OF A 1 G ' "LONESOME DOVE L ]' � n � �,��264 O C .3 A J.-�Y I . 7 I�f R ja S i TR 1 A58 13 E Yy 1��!J 1.68 AC 17 l �I 15 � . 1......, . . 16 I TR '1A4 6 14 I 1 AC • 1 .... . . ..... .. ...mo.a. . .tea .. EMERALD CIR. TR 1A2 • EMERALD CIRCLE i 1AC I . . I '`c5 I I Q U 3 4 5 6 7 12 10 �Q 8 9 I a In I II . • • TR 2A AG TR 2A TR 2A1 1 t I / `\ f ` I 4.001A1A1A2 AC TR 2B1 I TR • F. SHELBY / M. MOLINA AG TR 28 .8 AC 7 AC iri M. MOLINA TR 181A1 +,I TR lA TR 1A .5 AC 1\_ - A G ' .85 AC A G Q 1 AG AG [TRiAl AG \ .9 AC TR 1 A2 TR TR TR 1B1A6 TR 5A2 -TR 4A1 4A2 4A3 TR 1.69 AC 2.39 AC 1.o AC 9 1.5 AC1 1 m C. HALL / 1 .0 1 .0 c x _ D. WALSH AC AC •- LU ' TR 4A Cl) 0 3.32 AC z m U.S.A. < 0 f-' TR 1B1A7 C1 F- U) TR 4A TR 5F1 0 Q LLJ amour 3.32 AC 1.14 0 III 131 -D .24 AC 4 TR 4A5 AG / 1.08 AC T• 7R 161A3 5D1 77 JP WHITE AG w D ROCKENBAUGH 0 TR.5DtA f . ,�42) , TR 40 TR 4D = 2.84 p 2.64 AC 2.64 AC / \ .ci-1• ^) C. UNRUH • 44. ________________i______________ --------,....,,,,,,_ • SF1A ADJACENT OWNERS 1 } AND ZONING TR 3A .‘ i SPIN #5 JAN FRANCIS 2 .1 0 16 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-250 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 3.32 ACRES SITUATED IN THE F.THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1511, BEING TRACT 4A, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-250.WPD Page 1 Sproducing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southiake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southiake,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, SWHEREAS,the CityCouncil of the Cityof Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southiake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southiake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed Sand amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 3.32 acres situated in the F. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, being Tract 4A, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached L.\CTYDOC S\O RD\CASES\480-250.W PD Page 2 i • hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the • particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to S such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-250.WPD Page 3 .`csC 6 • Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southiake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOC S\O RD\CASES\480-250.W PD Page 4 c( 7 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-250.WPD Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a 1/2 : iron pin found , said point being North 89 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds East 208 . 30 feet , North 01 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds East 430 . 50 feet , and North 56 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West 47 . 0 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 11 , Block 1 , Hunter 's Ridge Addition, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-134 , Page 16, Plat Records , Tarrant County , Texas ; THENCE North 56 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West 284 . 60 feet to a Bois D ' arc state found for corner ; THENCE North 88 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West 273 . 80 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner ; THENCE North 01 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds East 15 .00 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner ; THENCE North 89. degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds East 108 . 10 feet to a 1 /2" iron pin found for corner ; 4111 THENCE North 01 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East , at 358 . 00 feet a 1/2" iron pin found , in all 385 . 70 feet to a point in the center of Dove Road (County Road No . 3080) ; THENCE South 77 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds East along the center of Dove Road 73 . 30 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 639 . 00 feet ; THENCE Southeasterly , along said curve and along he center of Dove Road 275 . 60 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE South 47 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds East continuing along the center of Dove Road , 238 . 90 feet to a point for corner ; THENCE South 09 degrees 38 minutes 00 seconds West , at 35 . 90 feet a 1/?" iron pin found , in all 259 . 60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3 . 32 acres of land ,"- of which 0 . 31 acres is in use as a public road . 11/1 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-250.WPD Page 6 (!' s C(' • • City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT August 1, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-091 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Higgins Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for the proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Higgins Addition, being legally described as approximately 3.32 acres situated in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, and being Tract 4A. LOCATION: 1496 E. Dove Street approximately 120' west of the intersection of Lonesome Dove Avenue and East Dove Street. OWNER: Mrs. Elizabeth Higgins APPLICANT: Area Surveying, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District • LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200 notification area: • Frances Hogue, 1 507 E. Dove Road, Southlake, in favor. • Dorothy Rockenbaugh, 1901 N. Carroll, Southlake, in favor. " 'Miss Lizzie' is probably our oldest citizen. She should be allowed to do whatever she likes with her property." P&Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated July 11, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 11, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated August 1, 1997. • L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-091PP.WPD S D -1 • ( -1-- < i1,.,L., ' 1 1 ow / L, I r-- 4 , AlEA . *V tf 1 ______ ililla * am... muff ..� 5/ �' '� 11, . . W--Amp tin mg • 1-- j \ ,..._--- • 0, ---.-- •11 1 1313.,-/ y1i�i ■ ESI A l - I . LiJ_ I l„ i I■ .m,,,,avolin. 1 N api irdri,A0P;s:sliSi 1:-.., .1 /\ .. —NIP- .00Aimmo ilk ■1v Wier -! 00 i 1 dr. . , , 11,, 0 , A cav�aal IN Ei.1- • 1 poix•-__ ., i r 2 r . isots(14 I _2ri • •• . i T hi t i. 6 ____ SAC£ Ai WI :Frig , ____ %Pfr ''' ' -qAt' I. --J-1P4. , MAME Ut wry 1 i - - •= •�.. .• ■-t � • � I _' ,I wk„, :asioif rt � p4i, , • -*.cik\,,,,, . TRACT MAP A >) P r • oI o1413 a THE OAKS 1 OF 1, I I ■- "LONESOME DOVE A L r D „4.264 0 3 7 RA 1-j I 3 �1 s TR 1A5B • 1 �j IT AC �A 17 i t • 1.68 ,5 �S . ,6 • .I - - • ITR •1A4 6 14 • I 1 AC EMERALD CIR. TR 1A2 EMERALD CIRCLE i 1 AC II . ' • I 4 5 1 2 6 7 1 �5 11 �Q a 3 8 9 10 i I a 0. • . I 1• — . 1 rm 2A TR 2A TR 2A1 • I TR 1AlAtA2 I 4.1A AC r F. SHELBY AG // • TR 28 TR 281 M. MOLT NA AG .8 AC - .7 AC ""� IN M. MOLINA / TR 1B1A1 +3+ TR 1A TR 1A .5 AC �__�- AG ' .85 AC AG 01 AG AG AG TR tA1 \ • .9 AC TR 1A2 TR TR TR 1B1A6 $ TR 5A2 _TR 4A1 4A2 4A3 TRH C. HALL 1.69 AC 2.39 AC 1.0 AC 71.5 AC1 1i CO 1 .0 1 .0 c Y _ D. WALSH AC AC TR 4A CC O 3.32 AC 5 z m U.S.A. < 0 }" TR 1B1A7 0 H cn TR 4A TR 5F1 Q Q 1.14 0 ++: +3+ 3.32 AC W -� .24 AC 4 TR 4A5 AG / 1.08 AC T. TR 161A3 5D1 77 JP WHITE AG ' w D ROCKENBAUGH 0 TR 40 TR 4D 7R.501A ` . ,�°'1. _ 2.840 2.64 AC 2.64 AC i "\ ry C. UNRUH SF1A ADJACENT OWNERS • / AND ZONING TR 3A A SPIN #5 JAN FRANCIS �h-3� 2 .1c 0 16 s City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ease No: ZA 97-091 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/01/97 Project Name:Preliminary Plat- Higgins Add. being 3.32 acs. situated F. Throop Survey. Abst. #1511 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Jackson L. Gentry Area Surveying. Inc. 317 Dove Creek Trail 102 W. Trammell Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth, Texas 76140 Phone : (817) 481-4718 Phone : (817) 293-5684 Fax : Fax : (817)293-5685 Attn: Clarence Hart CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. * The applicant has met the requirements of previous reviews. * Although the lot lines are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. • Denotes Informational Comment cc: Area Surveying, Inc. Jackson L. Gentry Elizabeth Higgins, 1496 E. Dove Street, Southlake, Texas 76092 L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\9709I PP2.WPD I 1110 • • t Lot rarold S h — _ V96wa 36601.1 Popat9D Z FIELD MOTS ard AG - "' _ _ • 'told sutra for a tract of land in rho Planets Throop `5 I - • Sur vr. Abstract No 1511. to that City of Soothota. _ _ + TarrantCounty. Texas. And Drinn •portion of that certain r _ - • tracr, of land on vwtOd to Elizabeth Ht991ns by dead of _ VIclotY t1t 1 cord in Volumes 154e. PAa+ 446. Dead Records. Ta,rant 1•� 1 /7q� _ ` county. Team•. and De1n9 Je•cr abed by metes and bounds as _ L Mario Mara sad al Argo' Mold , 101100.. \ _ Vdr ZC992ooid Aeys 3B2 o� found. said point Doing North I gated AG Rld door mr at . `nut i pin \ B9 d•9r a+a 1. minutes rr iron ••enae East loe.)o last. Hurts 1 \ OI degrees 41 •nutesi 00 ...condo last 9)0.50 feet. and '. I Nortn 56 d,pre+s 10 w nuts 00 • cond&Most 41.0 foal from 9 �tb, _ the Xort h+•st corn+r of Lot II. Block 1. Hunter's 111dg. AA•fit ion. •:cording to riot rs orded in V91um• )BB-17r. 1 ISr Natoli,� /, % . Pogo 16. Plat Record•, Tart•nt County. Texas: I / Crawford Card lid THENCE north 56 dowses 10 winut.. 00 s once West 284 60 e ^'i ,• Vat\, 1 N /adr Dv*Sw�� / later to • Boss D'A[c stake mound for cor natr: ill rJ �p \J Vollmer 3Na.Pepe 207 r5 \ I •� 2osad AG tNenC[ North BB •le Vt ems 12 minutes u 90 s nJ•Meet 713.BO gat I d :I feet to a 1/2" lion pin found lot corner. �' I \ OQ� I THENCE North nl dot/roes 5)minor wm 00 seconds [art 15.00 DDD � T Lion coin.; . M �,� !• / foot t9 . v r' i n pin found 19r e r. iy5 I ti T y g $ae N6N 0 // JE • THENCE North 89 doOre•• .a wlnnteacorner; 00n..conds [aai we 10 I 1`+ g him I \ • % •- / OI PPV7.840 /•9r feet to • 1/2" iron Pin found for or ec I 53 I Lot 2 �f� . \.. Val.. A(( THENCE north 01 dept. . 13 minutes 00 seconds ['cat. at • \ 3s0.00 leatt a 1/2` v n Pln mound, In •II 395.I0 foot to y I y L00 A0. not A \ ��''. \' IS..It.2I /O Point in the canter of owe Road 1C0unty load No. 10801; w opo..dZ7.aay"ATSrT/t \ �,\{�,.\ /' Q TileN;E South 71 •l+pr•es 44 minutes 00 • onda EAst along �'� th• confer of Doer Rued 2].)0 row[ to the beptnntnp of \ . • curve to the rtpht having • radius of 639.00 feet. cO \ curve; i t740L0 1 6/G \ / O� THENCE Soutnw.Asvtly, al•n9 mild curve .and stony the "if /\ \ ' centCE South o Dove Road 711.60 meet es the end of •AOA c ` E,ottny AG -) 9y� / C Hance so•n o.tl a,•ir eat. of minutes on seconds ss•t H \ •I s�1 • .Dint for yen along the cantor of Dove Roed, 7JN 9J later to er I [fM'OD'i IW 14 --_1 l( • THPXCE south 09 deg[e•m 18 minutes 00 seconds Most, et .J �`,, \ P- 8 )5 90 last • 1'2" Iron pin InunA, to all 25. 60 feet to . • ' --- -'----"---�..-.---_—__ �9P.+s�p \\\\ o .YYI��� ' the POINT O/ BCOINNIN.•and u co•aining 3.32 act..of land. IssjA kJ7� l o/ which 0.31 • r•r i e public re•data Daa. flee5rbw�. , ��' :_Block 1 s! v IB7i Pegs) o NOTES zwd AG Eat; \ w rat P.tbgw o4474: Rv� \ t Tha a«to be ddrmed fir R.O.W. �11t. ,f• Valais 2 Ma awo k e+iMg Rataiod row:amp `% I 975 Zard AGE j4hs°o-,y si Y \ Preliminary Plat of P ys r� _ Cluovitoro L�wS �� J Higgins Addition EaW4d ••d Oro. Denby Ha rtcra• r7wil�. z, Low• Wa ,r,ar �yA. &mop POB a � an Addition to the City of p �,,oat in,R„ AG ga A i z a DDT v+9 gP jj Lot 1 SoutHoke. Tarrant Canty. Texas }� f'1 9.9 4446 being 3.32 acres of land • �` w9a +DO.s*M out of the } saalddt.Tex9r 76092 - I a ' 3�� 1°°Ia ��� Francis ThrooP Survey. Abstract No. ISL I CLINE DELTA ANGLE RMIUa MC TANDEM t9a11D O1 S BE.ARIIa I t Lor 2 Tarrant County. Texas c 1 9la2'42' 639.00' 275.40' 128.9E' 273.47' 9 59'22'39'E �1 s Wisp.077l 546 2 La 5 F Dore CroakTrd6092 s Pre aced June 1997 l 481-47e�'7 Amended July 1997 SG LINE BEAR Ira DISTANCE ' r - 50 L I N 01'54'o0-E 15.00' I SZ.RVEI'OR r L 2 3 7744'00'E 23.20' ZA97-091 �w� M6I11.1a'E___9BL]o__ I Omen. 5 • AREA SURVEYING, INC. O SO IOO \ ti M.Cov�.dL99...,[f[odotalikkoi l ID1 N.7 str•.t �� Vol..SeB-al ` 11C71 293-5684 Fort Worth 0 7f910 � ` . Re[I • d ►ref merles• Tonal. sd Smr e•yere '�\ m re.ore. + t•owl MwtN T ••Nrr)aw-NM• (t i ran JUL 211997, 1 • r City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM III August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 681, 1st Reading, Street Name Change for a Portion of Stonebury Drive from Lot 1 to Lot 8 and Extending Through Lot 9 of Block 2 in Stonebury Addition to Indian Paintbrush Way BACKGROUND Toll Bros., Inc., has submitted a revised plat which proposes connection of Indian Paintbrush Way and Stonebury Drive in Southlake Woods and Stonebury Addition, respectively. Since this basically makes a single street from the two it will be necessary to rename a portion of Stonebury Drive to Indian Paintbrush Way. Attached is Ordinance No. 681 for the proposed name change. Exhibit "A" outlines IIIthe portion of the street the name change is proposed for. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ls` reading of Ordinance No. 681 for the proposed street name change of a portion of Stonebury Drive, from lot 1 to lot 8 and extending through lot 9 of block 2 in Stonebury Addition, to Indian Paintbrush Way. Please place this item on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Coucil review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Ordinance No. 681 Original plat Proposed plat revision Attachment "A" S 8E-1 $ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 110 ORDINANCE NO. 681 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF A PORTION OF A STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "STONEBURY DRIVE", FROM LOT 1 TO LOT 8 AND EXTENDING THROUGH LOT 9 OF BLOCK 2 IN STONEBURY ADDITION, FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", TO "INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City"), presently known as "Stonebury Drive", from lot 1 to lot 8 and extending through lot 9 of block 2 in Stonebury Addition, to "Indian Paintbrush Way" has been requested by the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change the name of such streets as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: • Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the name of the portion of the street located within the City presently known as "Stonebury Drive", from lot 1 to lot 8 and extending through lot 9 of block 2 in Stonebury Addition, as described in Exhibit "A", is hereby officially changed to "Indian Paintbrush Way." Section 3. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. S 8E-2 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY • OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • 8E-3 7 • s 0 SQJ'fLAKE (WA `I< SITE :i: I LOCATION 3I { § ACKARO ADOIflCH I VOLUME 3823-42. PAGE IF. I7 �.1 Y 11 P.R.T.C.T. -, z Iiz W.S.• KIDO FAMILY L . PTNRSHP, VOLUME 11587. PAGE 692 LOT 2 ca. .T L.J O.R.r.C.i. P.0.8. 4 LOT I VICINITY MAP �� "O l �"•`"` __ __ N 89_04'05. E 997.92' __ r ..S. •,_• 7 �!WT-6j aj'• rlr•T:'T.4-ui.j7T6736' HT u/E 1r.�• •. se* BLOCK 2 _"f 7T�' . ":? w - _7- IM wW' - 2; S la r .. .a aL�.. e 3 l''nI • I• '•. ...�3 !• may_+d/L. t -i`•••!... _9.3 \ �k�`Y/_:•:.o RCBERT ' SCCOE 1 ` _ �. 6•a') _ °' i \ a:i•� �:t PROPCSED VCLUME 92'2. PAGE 1310 ' \ '. :� ' '> a I Raw o.R.r.0 i. I�� to a `. �' 0 389JIitV Y a,: mler + S.- W„ oEDlG►Dp9 ;a �3' sd.i':.?77 f4/• h .6.:6 'sJ 2 1, 2 u 06 1 . u0 1 9 I © 3s•3/l '.O !" •t7j3.3,t 1; i •r` m 1 ;; 1 • 13 °.,sl3• ( `s: f•..'. 2 te rs9'!,'23 I. K'u >, a ▪ 14 w T //10'd0'V/E m a f L SC 56' B W I .�' .j O -•3Br'E�T _ia2'L'.J!_�•C_�i9111i` _� m 1 �� D - II �. - v1 -+ Ss_et er if i^ 10 .° 12 _•. g.<• , 4 gil,- 1 .5.•,.. 7 la wj LLJ r wn ..A-Zi0 r.nnn. 9 "Yi * , 1 I a ▪F u.1F♦ - < u7!'r-/ -. 0 33'8/LJ L • S89.3:_3'N .,IA. 0 b. I�'Lt9'_.:8*:f�"mill I _ ,-• .,3'Y.Z.-. - _ •, ..L,... .., , NOTE O • •+1 3'. Ilany.�. 2r.20•:Pc 7 _ ••3•.1 n �y21 e. W 1 --.- CCY.YCN • COMMON AREAS ARE PRIVATE AND 11- <I 'II •' O --j-t-_T' _ I; •ILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED 3 , ' •'3 t ▪ - e-i STONEBURi[ CTa.,_ ( �,��, "�� NL t w • 11 w ' 11 _ j' we3 s-i 't'N69'31'ze'_ 2z2.03 ':/ r1Q9'31'26•E 163 ut I „l BY THE HOfEO•AhERS ASSOCATICN 1 ^1 _ I "'fil:#E" _ 5'. 3_++• ♦ .;' 7 •+J+3' 3 �/ I J 'ol 1_ _ b : _ 1;STONEBURYr °0 I S:9.3n_,�▪ 1r�89'3'•:S•A a •8 5 \ .'�33'eft. •^ o' tx DRIVE 1�,. O \ • NOTE (r'- 0 m�.(Q$ •s!:c j _ �' 6 m '2 r 6o.^a THE 10' PUBL:C LANDSCAPE o IF_ oiz^LT I !•;± zd ',; ""°asifl2" ���=BLCCK1-1 Ig - r `� Z EASEMENT WILL 3E MAINTAINED BY 18 t0 - o ' 33'Ba �. THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCAT CtI z 1� 12 S' 8 ,.+.+ v2 U�_9:�1LSIL:3•E9•T'�L`_ I I. Row 0 - r35• arse" 0OT'';eE33-- 75..E 5-75� 20 •m F. . \to•n0 u f a 1 i89'S•_3_'w Lw --:d3:':::_7 \O. r',.11 Sly \� /E2 ±8�• 1 -9..,•..•c � '- NOTE •--_; -- 1 . 1D u?-r�s-, r.5 '�O :. :57s9' °' RoAOWAY LtU • it +8.3'•!i3: e / 9 Tom•�� ;. E9 8..19.E ..'3•. 7 )"'' !8.' wl(TH A THE OWNERS OF ALL CORNER LOTS 1' `to'u/E o 4 I "'fi«"" s7.,� •E• .� ;?..a- . 7 . _ 6 Se' 22 (rm.) t1. SHALL MAINTAIN SIGHT TRIANGLES I'-' t3 t \ j5.0,1 �••- :.,. •33.BA '• 3 I 19 '1• .. • tN ACCORDANCE 'M71s THE CTY o S. .� -2l.A' �� bi a� SL:BOIVI$1CN ORDINANCE. �.�. •,� \Jts•• 56:5' "2 I3'-•••_••7•.2 to 6' 3.31• l� u .�' V 7 ,- ,._,,, ' N U Y.7s DRIVE •��� s� N-N • - - I so-;E \i3„ `- p 589'31'26'r }j-i 27t.sF , o .---„!..-..0.,_: <!',cr.. NOTE 1 NO PRIVATE ORIVE'NAY ACCESS I e,,'rl3• ..-••�I�Il-f-t s j.' Sq 3y y• �' `� 9 ,,.. • TO S PEYTCNVILLE Av£NUE 14 •„7S `t0:u/E - =-5.-A /.'s'e -- '7•+• 17 5 18 id►^ MLL BE PERMITTED. r; -4A' 15 _ to ?•.....!:,;,......• 'fo'i w o^f� I �• z7//` a rw9nffy.•7" .$2 /.•6�.A• iIs• u/C7 tBLOCK 2 " I • NOTE L_2'i:i_J/ :+13: 73• u/E i.:I i.-.�_ .�, .0 __• ,•• J \ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES (3) S 89'29 a0• W 1001.12 t0 9£ REMOVED. ` sir u na- `\\\ Lot 2 LOr , • \sa.fs' `72*.R n0 • I •/7'Le n9 . NOTE BAKER ESTATES I BUILDINGS Cu LOT I k LOT 20. BLOCK 2 WILL CABINET A Sl:OE 1575 BE RECLiIRED TO FRONT ON STCNEBURY DRIVE P.R.r.C.T. ♦♦'' ( i.e. 'AEST SICE CF LOT ). X -` • LOT AREAS NOTE ? i= B I THE CITY CF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RECL:IRE alCCX BLOC. 2 MINIMUM FINISH FLCCR ELEVA';CNS CH ANY LOT CONTAINED _0: ' . 21.479 S• Sr LO' ' • 20.739 38 SF *THIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SHOWN !l S '-J. I • 2J.S's 55 SF LOT 2 - 20.503.39 Sr ARE BASED Cu THE MOST CURRENT :NFCRMATICH AVAILABLE .3' 3 • 21.299.1 Sr LOT s 31.670.67 Sr AT THE TIME THE PLAT IS FLED AND MAY 3E SUB..ECT TO s I.0' • • 22.2:3 22 7 or . - 20.3J72+ Sr , .07 5 • 25.225)9 SF LOT 5 • 20.266 67 SF CHANGE. ACOITIONAL LOTS. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN. .Or S • 22.3t830 SF LOr 5 • 24.451 77 S MAY ALSO BC SU8_ECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLCCR CRITERIA. L3' 7 • 24.•99 23 SF LOT 7 • 20.+01 53 SF •JT 6 • 23.395 53 Sr LOT 3 • 28.262 5+ SF .3' 9 • 27.505 75 IF L0' 1 • I0..31 69 SF 4110 :sr •0 • 20.'51 37 Y ;0' •o • 20,506A3 Sr n • 20.'.0 42 SF LO' 20.21 55 SF .3r 12 • 'C.'.0.2 7LO7 '2 • 0.291 93 Sr '.0' 73 • 2'.313•6 SF LOr '3 • 20.569 77 Sr CURVE DATA :07 13 . 32..47 35 SI LOT :. . 30.152 30 Sr LOT '5 . 30.126 20 SF p I '> I g G 05 I O 3.007 3 L37 •s • 30.136:3 Sr LOT •7 • 30.'2503 Sr A- 1.70'96• 0- ,19•+Q,3• p- zs••rtr A. 23-+rIr A- 3.:0,•' .3- 34:0'T4• .5- 4979'•1• -J• • • )•••35 7 , - 203.30• R • 100.3C' R - ,25.30• I R - 75.00• R -;3' 'S • 32. '3>s Sr 225 OW R - 173.00' R - 20.00' L0' '1 • 22.30732 Sr T • 263.' T • 172.36• T - 2662' r . T7.tr T • 59.51' T - 54.Or I - 9.33' L0' r: • 20.296 39 Sr I. • 51.79• L - 2C6.56' L - 56:S. I L - 33.76' L • 134 Se L • :04.38' 1 L - 1 7.•5' 8E-4 3 H 35 BL \ 43 9a`• + LOT ex BLOCK 2 r /cn 14, 15 16 17 el IB �I I9 ^_ 20\ o• ,..' ( COMMON AREA N0.21_- x•° '"-i 25' W+DSCAPE u. • ✓J Esur. TO HOA BLOCK'6 I X se . r` ;^'^ram ^r•. ten.+ram tl 12 I r, zie tz° f �°e h t:o .o BX� ro ✓�..�,�� �J �_...: \ I' 0 'A36.8)'C�w• JJ 'L.��,�� .. :� w l._-• _'... `` ` '�t J) L .f`Jv`� +�v13R r 12 R= 11 R IOR '�' Syr' P ,, ENO $' ST EE7 u. .,� �, o n �_ NAM CHANG' zy 11 BLOCK 2 35 BL •:� ° I a LOT �563�8'3 f 171.38 a�—+zz zz ss o��. 8R • m— ''0 I I r' BRANDON BAKER $TONEEtURY ORIV • �•'� ��o z I. 1014A I± VOL. 1 O.RT PCB 2326 R.125.00' - 0s S23°34'OS"E 210.13' ZONED C-2 ,rt. F1M I• o O.R.T.C.T.� R=12 5.00' \' _ COMMERCIAL I '- ) 7.46. 54' PHASE IV 7 8=37°55'26" L.U.D. * MIXED USE 'CK 6 II 15 ° W & B KIDD FAMILY L.P. +o ) L=89.10' 9 10 11 ' 2 i�3R Ft R:75.00' VOL. 11587 zzo '. +`)y ZONED SF-1s S83° 59'14'W 50.00' :25.77' PG. 692 374.47' J- L.U.D. ESIDEN N w� BLOCK 1 L, _,Jr- ° L:49.64' D.R.T.CT. ' OF BEGIN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Y c S89°31'28"W 1641-0 ' B. A, ESTATE uo o N00°28'321W.40.52' � �� R:225.00' TRACT 1 1AB. A, SUDS 1 75 16 5 4 I 3 T:29.29' P.R.T.C.T, m r L=58.26' FOSTE S I % ZONED SF-20A FosTeR R. 75.0'07" U.D. MEDIWlJA((,ppP9S1Y RESIDENTIAL N89°31'28"E 34.66' - v0L 7312 R: 75.00' m `-1 I !"sTWEBURY i S.32°34'S3'E T.19' Pc. uea .-1C- L1ff 'l9). `�523°53'18"W 25.51' -1 �_• P.R,T. .T. ` JJ�L-45CL�S 2- L, 1� J.l 1 "' cv S 03°53'35"W.12.62' [ . ,vim 17 mW> 1 2 �- 4 0 SF-tA I ZONED zo ' -t p: 17°32'26" PESILOW 1 ENTIALS{Q RE ^ z0 ' `2:: ESTATES -)(L.U..DJ EN LOWTIAL ENSfh' r R.I25.00' .123. PG. 99 I ti• \ 0 L T:19.28' REVISED T.C.T. Y`-"8�2aNDON BAKE12 �^ - \ )•�•--., I L:38.27' . ypL }-i:t92. PG. 2300 - - 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 73 J -7.) �( �G.R��C.T. L� •1B 19 20 Z�� -. 1 ,; 2 FOR d I-�1.1 ) .O� J ._,, 'J STONEBURY PLAT AND Q ,`� 1 L. o� _—_. w. DYES SNMY.ABST.z:0.500 '" QU� - 4 FACEN SURVEY ASST.NG. 173 c0 SOUTHLAKE WOODS N I• 1 j I BLOCK 1 6 33 AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES v+ l < ZONED SF-20A CC 1 a 2 I.U.D. MEDIUM 5 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, cc DENTAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ,,, ZONED SP-1 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS FOUR a PARK PLACE ADDITION u 32 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION 6 C+ o CAB. A, SLIDE 2575 g CAB. A. SLIDE 1460 AS RECORDED IN VOL. 388-123, PAGE 2 m P.R.T.C.T. . P.R.T.C.T. 99 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS o 3 I 4 co a Y o 31 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BROADWALK AvE. 8 EXISTING ZONING SINGLE-FAMILY-SF-20A 3 I I 30 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7 LOTS =(1.39 DU./AC) --APPROX. EXISTING TREE LINE 4.31 ACRES OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABS. NO. 500 69 LOTS (±1.56 DU/AC) 45.5 ACRES OUT OF THE W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 '60UR - ` 11/ T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 0' .- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS %Ir -• APPLICANT & OWNER PLANNING&ENGINEERING TOLL BROS., INC. 0' 200' 400' 600' 800' �_�� � DOWDEY.'ANDERSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. 4010 EIDER DRIVE • 5225 VILLAGE CREEK DRIVE,SUITE 200 McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 PLANO.TEXAS 75093 PH. (214) 562-8855 FAX (214) 542-O 4I SCALE: 1" = 200' (972)931-0694 (972)931-9538 FAX SCALE : 1' = zoo • ZONING CASE NO. ZA 96-81 SHEET 1 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 682, 1st reading, designating a contiguous area in Southlake as Reinvestment Zone Number One and creating a Board of Directors for such zone. We are proceeding on schedule with the creation of the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone. The attached ordinance legally establishes the Reinvestment Zone. The ordinance further describes the required process which was followed in creating the Zone; reiterates the Tax Code and the qualifications required for creating an Investment Zone; establishes the board of directors for the Zone; describes how the Zone shall operate; and defines the life of the Zone. As you may notice, Section 4 addressing the board of directors is incomplete. This, and other issues concerning the participants and their level of participation, will be resolved in the next two weeks as we meet with the overlapping taxing jurisdictions. The level of participation and any special frictions on project spending will be addressed in separate interlocal agreements. These contracts ll be drafted prior to our meetings with the entities and will accompany the ordinance on second reading August 26,1997. Please place Ordinance No. 682 on the Regular City Council Agenda for August 5, 1997 for consideration. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. LAH/dai • F• k 4111 ORDINANCE NO. b£2 AN ORDINANCE designating a contiguous geographic area in Southlake as Reinvestment Zone Number One, City of Southlake, Texas; creating a Board of Directors for such zone; making certain findings and determinations in relation to such reinvestment zone and resolving other matters incident and related thereto. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City") , desires to promote the development or redevelopment of a certain contiguous geographic area (a 646 acre tract of land bounded by East Highland Street, North Kimball Avenue, East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and North Carroll Avenue) within the City by the creation of a reinvestment zone as authorized by the Tax Increment Financing Act, V.T.C.A. , Tax Code, Chapter 311 (the "Act") ; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Act, a public hearing on the creation of the proposed reinvestment zone and its benefits to the City and the property in the proposed zone was ordered to be held on August 26, 1997 , during the regular meeting of the Council scheduled to begin at 7 : 00 o'clock P.M in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas; and 1111 WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 311. 003 (e) of the Act, a written notice of the City's intention to establish such reinvestment zone was sent on the day of June, 1997 , to the governing body of each taxing unit that levies real property taxes in the proposed reinvestment zone, i.e. , the Carroll Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County Hospital District and Tarrant County Junior College District; and WHEREAS, on the day of , 1997 , the City Council of Southlake made a formal presentation to the governing bodies of the Carroll Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County Hospital District and Tarrant County Junior College District, which presentation included a description of the proposed boundaries of the zone, the tentative plans for the development or redevelopment of the zone, and a estimate of the general impact of the proposed zone on property values and tax revenues; and . WHEREAS, notice of the August 26, 1997 public hearing was duly published in the , a newspaper having general circulation in the City, in its issue dated 1997 , the date of such publication being at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the public hearing; and 1110 o+wsse %Ft Oa -fo WHEREAS, prior A the public hearing on the creation of the Seinvestment zone, a preliminary reinvestment zone financing plan as prepared containing information relating to the estimated project costs of the zone, the kind, number and location of all proposed public works or public improvements in the zone, an economic feasibility study, the estimated amount of bond indebtedness to be incurred, the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the expected sources of revenue to fiance or pay project costs, including the percentage of tax increment to be derived from the property taxes of each taxing unit that levies taxes on real property in the district, and other data; a copy of such preliminary reinvestment zone financing plan being attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1997 , a public hearing on the creation of the reinvestment zone was held at the time and place noted in the aforesaid notice, and all interested persons, or their attorneys, were invited to speak for or against the creation of the reinvestment zone, the boundaries of the proposed reinvestment zone as described in Exhibit B attached hereto and depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit C, the concept of tax increment financing and the appointment of a board of directors for the proposed reinvestment zone; and WHEREAS, all owners of property located within the proposed reinvestment zone and all other taxing units and other interested ersons were given the opportunity at such public hearing to otest the creation of the proposed reinvestment zone and/or the nclusion of their property in such reinvestment zone; and WHEREAS, the proponents of the reinvestment zone offered evidence, both oral and documentary, in favor of all of the foregoing matters relating to the creation of the reinvestment zone, and opponents of the reinvestment zone appeared to contest creation of the reinvestment zone; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1: The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct. SECTION 2 : The City Council, after conducting such hearing and having heard such evidence and testimony, has made the following findings and determinations based on the evidence and testimony presented to it: 1111.. -2- CI) V- 3 • (a) The public hearing on adoption of the reinvestment zone has been properly called, held and conducted and notice of such hearing has been published as required by law and delivered to all taxing units overlapping the territory inside the proposed reinvestment zone. (b) The creation of the proposed zone with boundaries as described in Exhibits "B" and "C" will result in benefits to the City, its residents and property owners, in general, and to the property, residents and property owners in the reinvestment zone. (c) The reinvestment zone, as defined in Exhibits "B" and "C" , meets the criteria for the creation of a reinvestment zone as set forth in the Act in that: (1) It is a contiguous geographic area located wholly within the corporate limits of the City. (2) The area is predominately open and because of obsolete platting or deterioration of structures or site improvements, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the City. 1110 (3) The area within the reinvestment zone substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the City; and has deterioration of site or other improvements. (d) Ten (10) percent or less of the property in the proposed reinvestment zone, excluding property dedicated to public use, is used for residential purposes, which is defined in the Act as any property occupied by a house which has less than five living units. (e) The total appraised value of all taxable real property in the proposed reinvestment zone according to the most recent appraisal rolls of the City, together with the total appraised value of taxable real property in all other existing reinvestment zones within the City, if any, according to the most recent appraisal rolls of the City, does not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the current total appraised value of taxable real property in the City and in the industrial districts created by the City, if any. 1111266 -3- qsc � ( f) The proposed reinvestment zone does not contain • more than fifteen ( 15) percent of the total appraised value of real property taxable by a county or school district. (g) The improvements in the reinvestment zone will significantly enhance the value of all the taxable real property in the reinvestment zone and will be of general benefit to the City. (h) The development or redevelopment of the property in the proposed reinvestment zone will not occur solely through private investment in the reasonably foreseeable future. SECTION 3 : The City hereby creates a reinvestment zone over the area described by the metes and bounds in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and such reinvestment zone shall hereafter be identified as Reinvestment Zone Number One, City of Southlake, Texas (the "Zone" or "Reinvestment Zone") . SECTION 4 : There is hereby established a board of directors for the Zone which shall consist of ( ) members. The board of directors of the Reinvestment Zone shall be appointed as follows: 1111 members shall be appointed by the City Council , and the governing bodies of each of the following taxing units which levies taxes on real property in the Zone (Carroll Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County Junior College District, Tarrant County Hospital District) , shall each appoint one member to the board; provided, however, that if a taxing unit waives its right to appoint a member to the board, the City may appoint such board member, in its stead. The initial board of directors shall be appointed by resolution of the governing bodies of the City and the taxing units as provided herein within sixty (60) days of the passage of this Ordinance. All members appointed to the board shall meet eligibility requirements as set forth in the Act. The terms of the board members shall be for two year terms. The governing body of the City shall designate a member of the board to serve as chairman of the board of directors, and the board shall elect from its members a vice chairman and other officers as it sees fit. 4111 -4- cl)F -5 /. w IIIIThe board of directors shall make recommendations to the City concerning the administration of the Zone. It shall prepare and adopt a project plan and a reinvestment zone financing plan for the Zone and must submit such plans to the City Council for its approval. SECTION 5: The Zone shall take effect on January 1, 1998, and that the termination of the Zone shall occur on December 31, 2018, or at an earlier time designated by subsequent ordinance of the City Council in the event the City determines that the reinvestment zone should be terminated due to insufficient private investment, accelerated private investment or other good cause, or at such time as all project costs and tax increment bonds, if any, and the interest thereon, have been paid in full. SECTION 6: The Tax Increment Base for the Zone, which is the total appraised value of all taxable real property located in the reinvestment zone, is to be determined as of January 1, 1997, the year in which the Zone was designated as a reinvestment zone. SECTION 7 : There is hereby created and established a Tax Increment Fund for the Zone which may be divided into such subaccounts as may be authorized by subsequent resolution or ordinance, into which all Tax Increments, less any of the amounts not required to be paid into the Tax Increment Fund pursuant to the Act, are to be deposited. The Tax Increment Fund and any 1111 subaccounts are to be maintained in an account kept at a depository bank of the City, and money deposited to the credit of such Fund shall be secured in the manner prescribed by law for funds of Texas cities. In addition, all revenues from the sale of any tax increment bonds and notes hereafter issued by the City, revenues from the sale of any property acquired as part of the tax increment financing plan and other revenues to be dedicated to and used in the reinvestment zone shall be deposited into such fund or subaccount from which money will be disbursed to pay project costs for the Zone or to satisfy the claims of holders of tax increment bonds or notes issued for the Zone. SECTION 8 : If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. .444266 -5- .. SECTION 9 : It is officially found, determined, and declared IIIthat the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by V.T.C.A. , Government Code, Chapter 551, as amended. SECTION 10: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force immediately from and after its passage on the date shown below. PASSED ON FIRST READING, August 5, 1997 . PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of August, 1997 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary III (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: City Attorney • III a44266 -6- • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Consider Award of Bid for the Slurry Grouting of Pipe Bedding and Repair of Concrete Street Pavement in Timarron, Phase I BACKGROUND In 1994 street failures were observed in the Phase I section of Timarron. Over the course of approximately 12 months discussions were held to determine the possible causes of failures. In 1995 Wiss, Janey, Elstner Associates, Inc. was awarded a contract to investigate the possible causes of the failures. The actual testing was done by Alpha Testing. In 1996 a report was issued by Wiss, Janey, Elstner Associates, Inc. with their findings and recommended repairs. • The project was authorized by City Council for implementation in the 96-97 budget. The advertisement for bids was published on June 6 and 13, 1997 and bids were opened on June 20, 1997. The bid results are as shown on the following table. There were two bid alternates proposed for this project; however, due to funding limitations staff recommends that City Council consider only the base bid. During the July 15, 1997 Regular City Council Meeting staff was asked to consider other alternatives that might bring the costs down for the proposed project. City attorneys have stated that the City has only two alternatives- either accept the current low bid or rebid the project. All streets shown on the attached map have experienced pavement failure. Staff would prioritize the streets to be corrected as follows: Phase I- Creekway Bend Phase II- Bent Creek Drive Phase III- Bent Creek Drive (West), Bent Trail Drive, Bent Trail Circle BID TABULATION See attached bid tabulation sheet. • 10A-1 • FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT The 96-97 budget allocates $650,000.00 for this project. Staff recommends that the additional funds ($32,024.30) be obtained from street maintenance if the current bid is accepted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends either to award the bid for slurry grouting of pipe bedding and repair of concrete street pavement located in Timarron, Phase I, to low the bidder Hayward Baker in the amount of $682,024.30 or authorize City staff to readvertise the project with a reduced quantity of work to be performed. Please place this on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/RH/cre Attachment: Bid tabulation sheet Timarron, Phase I Map • • 10A-2 , O 0 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID TABULATION PAGE 1 OF 1 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: June 20, 1997 Hayward Baker Denver Grouting Services 2510 Decatur Avenue 2550 West Gate Road Ste. D JOB TITLE: Slurry grouting of Pipe Bedding and Forth Worth, TX 76106 Pearland, TX 77581 Repair of Concrete Street Pavement at Ph.: Ph. Timarron Phase I-Bent Creek Subdivision Fax: Fax: 303-469-3581 JOB NO: Amt. Bid: $682,024.30 Amt. Bid: $716,312.20 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE COST Al General Conditions ea 1 $95,975.00 $95,975.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 A2 Performance Bond ea 1 $3,375.00 $3,375.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 A3 Labor and Materials Bond ea 1 $3,375.00 $3,375.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 B1 Continuous Slurry Grout Injection In ft 3180 $30.50 $96,990.00 $57.30 $182,214.00 B2 "Plug"Slurry Grout Injection In ft 3900 $16.65 $64,935.00 $13.15 $51,285.00 o B3 Remove and replace street pavement sq yd 4870 $63.25 $308,027 00 $70.88 $345,185.60 D B4 Perform slab-jacking In ft 1880 $39.15 $73,602.00 $30.00 $56,400.00 B5 Rout and seal joints&cracks In ft 19640 $1.82 $35,744.80 $1.59 $31,227.00 Total $682,024.30 Total $716,312.20 C Bid alternate No. 1 _ $3,670.00 $3,670.00 0 D Bid alternate No.2 $57,165.00 $57,165.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 c` f C•w.. • • � S S. WHIT • 11 ; , PEL 71 I ® 70 72• ~� 2 2 1 \5 w ^ r0 aao �° 6s 1t � � X DRIVEto I -a a• 0 C¢kh :x o 1330 1310 1300 100 r. �• /-' �b 15t%�ij 166 µ _. w "' -- llEMl• TRAIL CIRCLE �b�o /0 . 1• v ] 5 1315 13oS 1301 67 \ no U X o 2f c.' p '" 17 *k q[aG(B J O o o 4 . n zo 464 ,• • w ,QO,• • 411111,, .� X"------------_______141-4 1475 1485 1495 o 3 10 BENT TRAIL III+ CIRCLE-4 N. N D 7 )4( 1470 1480 14901 wl — ' x110 32 JI 3o I E-1 .. i Ill • 'x l 2 1 1 �° 11350 A .L40 w 7 Oh 1O 4�0 1420 141011 • '� 4'0 11400 1380 1370 1360 > �'� o0 1ru0 BENT CREEK DRIVE '� CD G��y 11 • 0 1425 1415 1405 1375 1365 1355 IJGS �7 h J 'Q 0 a o 12 32 y 31 a 11 to • ! E+ to GIL' ti W C. �n/ 1 0 M W ry 3 rh 13 �4 W 7 Ya E illir q n z 'o to 0 w 14 THE VILLAGE OF BENT CREEK •• �.i' U �� 1114 J JJ ;. , .,4 1� ( 1 JO TIMARRON ��0 PHASE ONE, SECTION T WO "Cr- -C.., Ul .." .... ./^ ... ...... ."w.u. ._.. 4 , City of South lake,Texas 0 MEMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Requested Variances to the Sign Ordinance 506-B for Burger King Located at 2025 W. Southlake Blvd. in Southlake Market Place, Phase II BACKGROUND Rosina Volpicella-Ludwig, franchise owner of Burger King located in the Southlake Market Place, Phase II, has applied for two variances to sign ordinance no. 506-B. First Variance Request: • The requested sign on the north side of the building consists of the name "BURGER KING" with a Burger King logo that is five-foot square. The sign ordinance limits logo height to 30 inches based on proximity to Southlake Blvd. The total sign area of 47 square feet is within the 142 sq. ft. allowed by the ordinance.(Note: The sign variance request for the "Burger King" banner sign is for 22.4 sq. ft., not 269 sq. ft. as noted in the application.) The applicant states, "Burger King's sign assortment is limited in size and shape, and does not comply with sign codes for the City of Southlake. We have no choice but to use signs approved by Burger King." The applicant is asking the City Council grant a variance to the Sign Ordinance requirement to allow the "logo" sign height to be greater than 30 inches. Second Variance Request: The applicant also requests an additional 4 ft. by 4 ft. "logo" sign on the rear of the building. This is more than the one attached sign per street frontage allowed since the building has only one side fronting Southlake Blvd. The applicant states, "It will enhance the appearance of the drive through and make it seem less like the back side of the building to the customers who frequently (sic) the shops behind our building." She also points out that customers in the shops to the south at the building will not know it is a Burger King and that the total square footage of the front and rear signs do not • 10 B-1 III exceed the total allowed by the ordinance. (47 sq. ft. from the first request added to 16 sq. ft. from the second request equals 63 sq. ft. versus 142 sq. ft. allowable.) The applicant requests that Council grant a variance to the Sign Ordinance by allowing a 4 ft. by 4 ft. "logo" sign on the rear (south elevation) of the building. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the requested variances to sign ordinance 506-B Burger King located at 2025 W. Southlake Blvd. in Southlake Market Place, Phase II, be place on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Memo from Charles Bloomberg, C.B.O., Plans Examiner Sign Permit Applications Variance Applications Sign Drawings Site Plans S • S 10B-2 City of Southiake, Texas . MEMORANDUM III July 16, 1997 TO: Bob Whitehead, P. E., Director of Public Works FROM: Charles Bloomberg, C. B. O., Plans Examin r SUBJECT: Sign Appeal for Burger King 2025 W. Southiake Blvd. Rosina Volpicella-Ludwig, franchise owner, has applied for permits for the signs for the Burger King under construction in the Southiake Crossing shopping center. The monument sign and the menu board signs comply with the sign ordinance and require no variance. The requested sign on the front (north) face of the building consists of the name `BURGER KING" spelled out horizontally in 19 inch high letters by 14 feet 2 inches long and a Burger King logo that is a five foot square. Section 16- A of the sign ordinance limits the logo height to 30 inches based on the distance to Southiake Blvd. The total sign area is 47 square feet with the allowable area being 142 square feet. er second request is for a sign on the rear of the building (south elevation). The request is for a four foot e logo or 16 square feet of sign area. Section 16- A also limits attached signs to one per street frontage. This lot has frontage only on one side. Please schedule this appeal for the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting. Ms. Volpicella-Ludwig will be present at the meeting. Attachments: Sign permit applications Variance application Sign Drawings Site Plans _ v7_'�. J L. 1 6 J.• DEPT.CF i=u3LIC',',•'Cafe S 10B-3 out to e APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT City of Southlake 410 ATE July 8 , 1997 ADDRESS OF PROJECT 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southlake , TX 75092 TENANT RnrgPr King PHONE NO. 817-355-1495 SIGN COMPANY PL ti-Li.rve, Inc ./American RHONE NO. 500-444-7444o I ADDRESS 623 Emery Road / Powell , TN / 37849 address city zip ILLUMINATED? ® NO (circle) ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Waters Signs (Guy Waters )PHONE Pager--972-901-3659 TYPE OF SIGN E'-- /01_ -) isnommomENN Permanent Dimensions ATTACHED (I` BURGER (01 HEIGHT POLE KING miiiimw (9 WIDTH 41VMONUMENT 1 =' ` �,,: ., _> ti 8 Sci (t .h� _,..,� AREA • OTHER -�":�.::;+5 DOUBLE FACE DESCRIPTION MONUMENT SIGN OVERALL HEIGHT (attached, pole, monument) ST—F . SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. I SI DOCUMENT'S ATTACHED: / Plot_Plan ✓ Sign Drawing (.See a1b�) FAarLetter From Property OwnerC q��Irc ri-t IS avv Ice) Electrician Regis ation(sui,�,e„v -err. 1 k>a Wa,i Conktc- n Co) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ,O� , t>�fil *************,t****,t*,t******; oscv *rr�*,t***k-**( *l. ;t t i- e(/ `r3II-35S--ILKS� ****-******** APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: PERMIT FEE COMMENTS S 1os-a • L. -- . out 1 Q - APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT City of Southlake 111/TE July 8 , 1997 ADDRESS OF PROJECT 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southlake , TX 76,092 TENANT Rnrgar King PHONE NO. 817-355-1495 SIGN COMPANY PLbsti-Line, Inc ./American PHONE NO. 800-444-7445 ADDRESS 623 Emery Road / Powell , TN / 37849 address city zip ILLUMINATED? ® NO (circle) ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Waters Signs (Guy Waters )PHONE Pager--972-901-3659 TYPE OF SIGN Permanent Temporary Dimensions )( ATTACHED BANNER iqr` HEIGHT r�' 14.-2• r_. 141-2.11 WIDTH IIDTHi I a.;,, 4q 1 r t4 .. a , �r ..1 � . ,1 ;;; �0, y.11,Y ki tci. of + a J. J o .d 1 i. . 1 .r-N UA /40gG9 frREA jW` CHANNEL LETTER SPECIFICATIONS r . , iM- •17n+omouAL -+_^TyL1i���. � ��'�t �..:�. .. �....'����I� �,9��i�,wbS,�'d�i f.. C!�c: auwNEL lE7TFAS ri"' - — �J ti.-n•IJ.•r��:- .MOUNfEDONAWAIINU►INACEWAY .KYDEX CONSTRUCTION WfMMRE OR ORANGE POIYCARSONATE FACES. CHANNEL LEI l E R •INTERIOR HAS LOW MAINTENANCE NEON ILLUMINATION. DESCRIPTION 63 AMPSREOUIRES{I}120 VOWS AMP CIRCUIT OVERALL HEIGHT (attached, pole, monument) 11 InC-Iles SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. OD' DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: V Plot-.Plan Sign Dra4ring 44k4-c1c1e4(se thole) Letter From Property Owner(gpplrcarif isa iv /) WA-Electrician Regis ation(gub ccM`-tr e c ParK way CansirL 1- eo) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT '� **,r**********,r,r*****Yr********** ************k -* ** ** ****et/ `**-355-lLKS� APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: PERMIT FEE COMMENTS S 108-5 Dut 'Q i APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT City of Southlake E July 1997 J y 8 , ADDRESS OF PROJECT 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southlake , TX 75092, TENANT RnrgPr King PHONE NO. 817-355-1495 SIGN COMPANY PLcsti-Line , Inc ./American PHONE NO. 8U0-444-71.' ADDRESS 623 Emery Road / Powell , TN / 37849 address city zip ILLUMINATED? 4110 NO (circle) ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Waters Signs (Guy Waters)PHONE Pager--972-901-3659 TYPE OF SIGN<. 5t Permanent •.T=M:EnZ�mInnm " Dimensions >( ATTACHED T S' HEIGHT POLE • 5l r : BURGER 5' WIDTH . . KING - MONUMENT s j 2 AREA OTHER MIME------ , ------1M ION MIN xis ' DESCRIPTION W011 Sign OVERALL HEIGHT (attached, pole, monument) " SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. S Or DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: / Plot .Plan Sign Drawing(See abc e.) FLetter From Property Owner (4pelicavrf'is ONJI1GY) Electrician Regis ation(so c„.6-1,ra E carte C�tvv `oa-f SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT -7 „6-00 tJ�/mil q S �O( - *************************************p***** ***** i L� ***�* `** * ILfCcs APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: PERMIT FEE COMMENTS S 10B-6 . • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION 1111 APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Rosina Volpicella-Ludwig ADDRESS: 471 C1 Cranhrnnk T)ri vP West Colleyville, TX 76034 PHONE: 817-355-1495 FAX: 817-545-1411 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Burger Kinq_ PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southlake, TX 76092 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot 8 Block 1 Subdivision Southlake Crossing, Phase II I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a re entative at the City Council meetingho is authorized to discuss this request, • a any unresolved iss7 , and appf changes, if any. �/ Applicant's Signature: Date: "Z/? *qL ************************ ************ ***** *t#t_*** ************************* ************ For City Use Only: FR,05011c( o(pA ��( - uet Ltd c a I hereby acknowledge receipt o e sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: . Title: The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the • City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached. ) Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. 4110- Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 10a-7 Demonstration P4 ase demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the ested sign variance. 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. We are requesting a sign variance for a 5'X 5' logo sign to be attached to the wall on the building' s north side by the front doors . This is a standard Burger King registered mark, and is a Burger King Corporation sign requirement . The sign' s twenty-five square feet of area, along with the other attached signs, do not exceed the total square footage for attached signs even though it exceeds the height requirement . 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. Burger King Corporation' s sign assortment is limited in size and shape, and does not comply with sign codes for the City of Southiake. We have no choice but to use signs approved by Burger King. Again, the two requested sign variances, in addition to the sign application for channel letters utilizes about one third of the allowable square footage for attached 1111s . 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties . The 5' X 5' logo sign is not located where it may cause injury, and is compatible with other signs used on adjacent properties . Our lot is much wider (Southiake Blvd. frontage) than it is long. We turned our building 90 degrees to accomodate the lot' s shape and in consideration of our customer' s safety; so they do not have to cross the drive through lane to enter the building. Placing a logo sign to west of the doors balances the narrow channel letters placed on the building' s east side. There is not much of a size or shape selection, because we must comply with Burger King Corporation sign standards . 4 . That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. The 5' X 5' logo sign is conservative, tasteful and is consistent with the character of the development along Southiake Blvd. The signs are standard registered Burger King marks with international recognition, and required urger King Corporation. 108-8 , . s Ou-thlQ ,e APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT City of Southlake •TEJuly 8 , 1997 ADDRESS OF PROJECT 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southlake , TX 76092, TENANT RihrgPr King PHONE NO. 817-355-1495 SIGN COMPANY Plasti-Line, Inc ./American SHONE NO. 8OO-444-744o ADDRESS 623 Emery Road / Powell , TN / 37849 address city zip ILLUMINATED? 3 NO (circle) ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Waters Signs (Guy Waters)PHONE Pager--972-901-3659 TYPE OF SIGN( l't Permanent /4.` 11.11.111111111.111111s1m Dimensions X ATTACHED mum ism = t HEIGHT POLE BURGER 4 t _r WIDTH .MONUMENT ¢ s KING t(p, AREA OTHER � . IIINI MIS _� DESCRIPTION Watt Si91 ,f ---m--- OVERALL HEIGHT (attached, pole, monument) -1 SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. / DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: ✓P1ot .Plan �i Sign Drawing TA-Letter From Property Owner C (tca 15 Ow-n.ce) tJ/XElectrician Regis ation@o cor t t gs--/ C.oyl t, Co) S IGNATURE OF APPLICANT C---7(?46,J, , ) ) �Jcd1,J gos 0(P s t(q -LC�1 , Dkkro,ev 3II-355—I445' ************************************************** ************* APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: PERMIT FEE COMMENTS S 10B-9 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 ' SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION • APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Rosina Volpicella-Ludwig ADDRESS: 4710 Cranhrnnk Drive West Colleyville, TX. 76034 • . PHONE: 817-355-1495 _ FAX: 817-545-1411 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being regues ted: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Burger Kinq_ PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 2025 West Southlake Blvd . , Southiake, TX 76092 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot 8 Block 1 Subdivision Southiake Crossing, Phase II I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a re entative at the City Council meeting ho is authorized to discuss this request, aW any unresolved issue , and ap ve changes, if any. Alicant's Sig nature:gnature: Date: `7. 7 ************************ ************ ***** ****** ************************* ************* For City Use Only: R() _;r"(ln t-,(f)1(r.-r- (' - .C1-1 (0 f C I hereby acknowledge receipt of-the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: . Title: The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 1013-10 • 1111 Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance. 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. We are requesting a sign variance for a 4' X 4' logo sign to be attached to the building' s south (rear) wall between the drive through windows . It will enhance the appearance of the drive through and make it seem less like the back side of the building to the customers who frequently the shops behind our building. The sign' s sixteen square feet of area, along with the other attached signs do not exceed the total square footage for attached signs even though, it exceeds the height requirement . 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. Burger King Corporation' s sign assortment is limited in size and shape and do not comply with the sign codes for the City of Southiake. We have no c but to use signs approved by Burger King. Again, the two requested s variances, in addition to the sign application for the channel letters utilize about one third of the allowable square footage for attached signs. 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties . The 4' X 4' logo sign is not located where it may cause injury, and is compatible with other signs used on adjacent properties . Our lot is situated forward on the shopping center development with shops located behind us . There are no identification marks on the south or west sides of our building without the use of the 4' X 4' logo sign on the south side . An example of a problem might be : a customer entered the shopping center from the west (by Albertson' s) and approached our building from the south side can not identify our business with leaving the property, only to find that he or she was already there . It is logical to identify the back of the building since it is a public space . 4 . That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. The 4' X 4' logo sign is conservative, tasteful and is consistent with the cter of the development along Southiake Blvd. The signs are standard tered Burger King signs, with international recognition, and required b urger King Corporation. 10B-11 0 0 0 a. . :.•4 ir -.., ... ._ t-- _ .... . —_ .......ekre..••••••••10 '/ 51111116‘;,141-1\'4 , ..._....---- ..,... .................. --I _1We 06.60 .%:, •KB.•le... r--.:g up;G - aw- ...a. Ai.....ti /1.0 .... - L- I Is) •.••........,••., ._.,. .....6 ww.. ',./ / // ,,,,,...,........-. Cc .-.,- rell'17114 I I I*. , n 60 ........., ............ . 1.. .__. ...."0:1 01••re ril me"".•re Irm. i ...0.61•00661.6 /1.0..k.11.6/ 6064.0i NVIII. 4-- ''''". ..1- -=--•'"-- / / /, / I, ---_--12= . t•:, ..s...- ......-... ... 1-• / t. 11 '•:•' r ....• // /. r'' / / // •MVO.. MOO . tr. ////r U: . ••....NaLs• ---I -. •.... NM I --...•••••••I•I.•• ........- ........ .. ....... .... ...... • MR. t.• ,K1..C.S3:-.4..4'#_..Z.‘;11.a.1.1... ''''''''/ ///;'44/../ ._. /••1... .r1.,..t.:74...r,....13.... .."... 441e..t. ' i....1.-..,...rr - ,;;; ,—,,,..._ . ....04............ ?- ..7.-"--....'...7-:..=-Z-4---•-r:-Cre----2-7.X.... IIMili 11111111111111 31110111 I.IIIIIIIIIIM,11 II - .... o, 0 MAN ENTRANCE ELEVATION - o ...D.V•II N — •.•••.•1•11••••• r\ L. ......... fa(1.0.41..1•00 _ • ••INI 11.1 1. - L — -. -------7---1 ..- -t '`-'•• ••••.• , milimm mitaffirifir UP ..r. i ,316, , i,iL, :.....•• rigualmt ••"Ir'"..."'" ... ..... '"' ..."7.. In ., 'fiLv_rei frgi.W.aridi 0' --4 1 igeneaCiagerreer • IhMinrilrireiriniVIIIIA4inerlallaileart.1 I A •---- ......'... III ,,,,,. ..1.,..,..,,,...,,........„.....,,,,,s.....„• NI ..•:. ..._111., .. •3: . ,_-•"" ''''' -"iv.- , , . -...-,Z . - 112 . dill II / 3 — - • • xun - r/ GO gle•G / - // / / ! • I/— •:: .: 1'•. • •WE 11.000011.26163.1 / -:.-10. .-1, ...7 i:a..:f• '1.......•.,.. I----- •----- _ ____.•. . '.;.'AM:..16.... ..,-,...,:•.......... • • —.. .---• - .3z74-.*- ----Atil(4E4 .4-E.W.:., ,. .,,,,,..,....-,..-.--, . - •. _ -ditazett.1.1....,:i.,.:Ait • ____,_...-..:,---,--------_i__ ,&._. on GM...I. x-0.001-• I no ow row•ow • - 111011 0 DANE-THRU ELEVATION ......-•-- ,?' . 6 A.I -0 .riri . L., 5wiv---EA-F. -6-------- v� 0 ,''' , ''', , ,._ , / , 7//./.- 4111k. / ,//l'' \ • \, - / /..,- --.( 0 / , / , , 1-9-,V1U la: _, V • 11./ I / d r5- /d 3lSld '0 H .$ H11M S I / / ds H�aIM ,01 'S30ddS M 6�,SZ_l8 / / � , \ N � H1 �w� 3S� Z i � .�In ��� ,YZ Yi(1WIWILN CD iz op ti- - - ----------- - /iz 4- ��� sl \ j A? 'off/ ' s`C's::.i__ / 0 �'/ �., m 3d1a1_ u��^^1l131N3 i -� dd OS'699 '�c' .8 // dll �!, rpA >Hr�u Slo l�'OS 000'9 O`% 0'S` r -__--.�( O73 alpl'iL a 8 10� �' S� Ill x3psn9 a3sodoad /,/ t CP •�F� 8/`' 'te. .c-,,L /// co / ..:,%\, ,,,,----„, e © i /�iriiia//�/�iiiii��� _—_.----_ orY /' i•M341S .S — O naHl �. d1 , ! • `n I 1 c° sf 3nlaa zz � Iry ''�z !,'I1,+,���n,� s� 4Z ! 8uic� 1 I 's - • I I / / ''11�' 1 11•. KiNei \ \ \ \ N \ \ I ;' / / I / sI 1 0 51 \ duY CD du Q � Q � � ® � � I lz a / a� a 1 / 'd,�1 ♦. cv I ^'c.cb ,.,/ / / Z g� 'dill Q . MpNt1AAEN�� I (J� _ , L1J - - - � 1 U I O J'ti L— I— I i j I 3 I j �'1 1 ' ; i I, I i 1 CO Sl I l -- I 3f----I— Aid In ir+oHd — 0 0I s` _ — ll 3---z.�8 N -- --� -t2.o. W. �.INE ,8i� Z vz GvR8 L./NC __ — --=---- 5ov-c11L.AKE 6L.vD. ) F•M. ki • City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Requested Variance to the Sign Ordinance 506-B for Wendy's Located at 2130 E. Southlake Blvd. in Village Center, Phase I BACKGROUND Carie Foster of Starlite Sign Co. has applied for a variance to sign ordinance 506-B for the Wendy's restaurant located in the Village Shopping Center at 2130 E. Southlake Blvd. The proposed monument sign, front attached sign, and menu board signs comply with the sign ordinance. Ms. Foster would like to place an additional attached sign on the driveway entrance side to the shopping center. The sign ordinance limits establishments to one attached • sign per street frontage, which is satisfied by the "WENDY'S" sign located on the face of the south side of the building. The applicant claims that the entrance to the shopping center functions as a street and should be treated as such. She would like the driveway to be considered additional street frontage which then would allow for additional signage. She therefore requests City Council to grant a variance to the Sign Ordinance 506-B to allow an additional attached sign to the east elevation of the Wendy's restaurant. RECOMMENDATION_ Staff recommends that Carie Foster's appeal for variance to Sign Ordinance 506-B for the Wendy's located at 2130 E. Southlake Blvd. be placed on the August 5, 1997 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Memo from Charles Bloomberg, C.B.O., Plans Examiner Sign Permit Application • Variance Application Sign Drawings Site Plans boc-i • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 25, 1997 TO: Bob Whitehead, P. E., Director of Public Works FROM: Charles Bloomberg, C. B. O., Plans Examiner///5 SUBJECT: Sign Appeal for Wendy's 2130 E. Southlake Blvd. Cane Foster of Starlite Sign Co. has applied for permits for the signs for the Wendy's under construction in the Village Center shopping center. The monument sign, front attached sign, and the menu board signs comply with the sign ordinance and require no variance. The requested sign on the east (right) face of the building consists of the name"WENDY'S"with their logo. The sign is 8' - 7" long by 2' - 6" high for an area of 22 square feet. Section 16- A of the sign ordinance limits attached signs to one per street frontage. This lot has frontage only on one side. The applicant stated the driveway on the east side of the building is a main entrance to the shopping center that functions much like a street and they would like it to be treated as a street with respect to the sign • dinance. 'lease schedule this appeal for the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting. Ms. Foster'will be present at the meeting. Attachments: Sign permit applications Variance application Sign Drawings Site Plans • r C 7 Y -r .: T V ED J�I. 2819S1 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS 10C-2 _____.7.7_____4.7 -:..-_:--,,, L AA ..______:--__ -_,. :-\ .,ii ,& 11,,i -._.., = . = . oulhiQ e APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT _--=--='____1 q 1, City of Southlake - \ 1 7 \cu7 :\- DATE I-) ( ! - _t ? .. - - - ADDRESS OF PROJECT a 13a E • Sou i,-lake, EI Va. TENANT (id•er' Y is PHONE NO. /a - (11-56-5°a. SIGN COMPANY S-f-c' ( i +e •Sic) ) .z) PHONE NO. gir7- 3 ga- 28 p ADDRESS ?fen E . McKinney / 1D en-tc(N / 9 (naC S' address city zip db . r r v ILLUMINATED? NO (circle) . . ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR K I) 6 (e +(,-1'qC, PHONE arq# 3 sr- ci`(7a. TYPE OF SIGN Permanent Temporary Dimensions X ATTACHED BANNER HEIGHT POLE • - BALLOON WIDTH • MONUMENT MODEL HOME AREA OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE DESCRIPTION On42,() 4a wait zi n -Puf " EAsT ' eleva+(Q OVERALL HEIGHT Ettached, pole, monument) Y 1 SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: Plot Plan . X. Sign Drawing Letter From Property Owner El trician Regis ration SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT tiM,LC) . , *********************************************************-******** APPLICATION APPROVEDY: Ir ,1 I DATE : PERMIT FEE COMMENTS 5 ! bNI K\cST ? It.,! !-t- p CA3 Y" 'j 7 ,V)' • A (t,o: 0 N ' F(LC(QT-4,r-�� '' 0 N c� > v711 r 10C-3 • —LS' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION • APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: ;A K-(E _ raST • (,d E nckv;'S T 1 e( nCi4 i 0 n& ADDRESS: I C a L . M C(1 1 1� C� •/ 'T 5- Li. ! ru I I E r A . Sf e . tiny h€ni0ij TX T . 'l (d0C TrcknG i Y `-.7 03R PHONE: 0 j '1 - 3 -60 ,i q - -661 I — C)L (0 FAX: g( '-7 - 3 r? - o`1a j 1im WG5T The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: ,-IINAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Ld enU /S PHYSICAL ADDRESS: o i 30 E., Sr 1 iak 6 3I Ud O I / • LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot Block Subdivision I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Or 'nance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a entative at the. City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, . a ss any unresolved i%Sues; and appr..ve changes, if any. Applicant's Signature: C"1, 0 `IA Date: / 0? —(-77 ****•.*****************************/******************************************************* For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: Title: . *******************************************************************************•*********** The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps; and codes available at the . City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached. ) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. • Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 10C-4 S. Demonstration Ilise demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the ytec sign variance: 1 . That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant . 4. n mcLv,\Q.__ e c do J\J-LL. 4t c C a d-- as,r _.k:LigA. dui do amy,. —±Lui ±-i*Ojc, do cR. 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. Cki2N4C9P-Sa aNit WV4PC C. \ J c / 11111 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties . )"\' udd, J\(\(0.t j\am 0,NA,G.6i o4.ot-t- cy\k. LJNA1Q-kcp • ilcsp2AN . . 4 . That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance . 4c,o," c,„ _c\u\coNkl--(aialii) ../._\c' 7-vL (ootkvoiy)a.. a_aocuz I ( k..) --t_A.,koN2. LaiAa±jcAA i, ais.k_0(1% 46\ J.too ca) ssi _rek. L-i-eola-Al 4,4_ L( u_ (‘_,L),c,b\g_ ._.lacd-. G:\WPF\FORMS\APPS\SIGN VAR.WPD 10C-5 • • . ' I .- (- 93'-6"STOREFRONT I _ tr gam' elatE r- . -------- -r --.- -- - ?-- - , - r -- — EAST ELEVATION 47-6"STOREFRONT 0 A] .063 Aluminum Channels& backs 5'r 313E Dk. bronze A r ' '�'�.�.�� B] 1" Bronze Jewelite Trimcap - - - _ f. C] 1/8"Thk 2415 Red Plexiglas Ltr. Faces a pi i \ \ Logo - 7328 White Face w/Vinyl Graphics C __ -{ / ❑ ❑ r} IE".°: -�'`" ❑ ❑ Fr�f Decorative Scrolls - Flat Cut Out 4- 0 � au,_ • � Alum. Painted FLNA 4123 Black D] 13mm EGL Clear Red Neon for Letters 0 ^� 13mm EGL White Neon for Logotito • E] Transformers Concealed Behind ' _ �`� Fascia .... CUSTOMER Wenlys ----- —-- - — LOCATION S.Lake BIA1. SOUTH ELEVATION 8'-7" CITC.STATE S88111(81,4 Tens 1StarliteSign , , tea Total Square Footage 7923 E.& mey Denim,1016208 SASEs Earle J.For �� • (-- r 24" Per Elevation: (817)382-88so W812)38/4429 SKETCH 97o7-0ur 16 to 30" Ltrs �� ' '• " >m b b natal1aE .i 1U v ' 30 x 8-T=21.45 5q. Ft. sr� o�r u�C".edr�e.�r suEf Ue• l nuUlE SUMMON,uK DAZE 1]97 i ... ......... .:; ,,,.... . ...... . , _ y ,/.. . _,......„-- .,,,..._ , . . . , 4 400 S.F. ; - 1 '. .1.• S' 6.' .---5 ._.-- 'of ...---, _________::,--- ,..... ".• „... .- -----:" %>.,>.• ...--- . .•,., .), - EU:LE).IN G Co Ti i --- ------•:,/ . . .,.. ,,,,, ,„:_, 1._ .... ".' i „....------ ,... -.1' •,/.. . ...„ . . ..., '''''''....." ;: 'j'''. )., .., ..4•,'. C ..Z '' • 23 411 .E ;--/ ‘. ' • \ ' /•-' VP..'' --- ! ,„...-' •;•'+' „....' ' 7..:,-..;• ."2 • i........---- •- : 1 ..„.....--r„......- „ •.0.• 0' 1' - .. ,....-- . •"-. ."". ..--". •••''.' •••• , • 1.4.: , . ' I .; - ...,.../ ....,...-, ....• , ,-. ' ...e.- • . -. ',-,, 2.2' c.::.:r,' Imp•• •• . C!...e. !SP.- • , <ry-, !•, z• 4 1:-..c):'„,_______ -,.. , - - ---- -1 -''''' - 2-• v. -1..K. --- i, ••.- -. ...- • .... --", -- • ) .-- .,••• • - ....;"..). .• . ..,-40, ,..-- .. s -'1J :• 0- --- :'• , ••• - , -- ! ••' .....-- .. .. ).•7•"".• „..-.--2141,,,-''. 2/2..;.I-.-'......./'." ..7...-..„".7 ..'.,"-•1,1',1I ,...-.,••„"..7. ... .••./.7.-....-7-7.:.i,!../0 ,.-.--"-"-..• 7- ,....../)..„.2311...",..,...,...-.'.. .,...---•.'•-3/-'",.V..',.•,Is'•.,) C.,. 1..) .,. ,. .--9--•• •'.FrtL•..r.•',.1•.. 4 ./''. ."'" I 1.<.'' .; ..• N:Ad• ! 10' ...-- ........../ /' .,',,,N •..• C ifr ti ,.._ ...,.....4 ..- -_y-, RETAIL s.De. : 4• o . -..-:';' -- :- '-- ::?, Y: 1 .4 • ...I • • CD .., ;•/.-...../ ..),:%\ •,..•..../. 7..-/•••-j..,,./„.../ 7,••2'..1I,-/...2,,'... '.'..r'•ss.,f'''Y .7 ,,•••. r. Ie ci , ,1.'1,„.)•?.,. 4 11 7 0 000 F. b 1: ,.‘,/‹. , .. ; "". Y ' N 41 ,e• /-a,,, BUILDING "CID' 6 •.') . o-,) 7. - .... i' N I ., ."1..,"" LAC).1. 3I BLOCK 1 •••,•,\„•;:..., .• ,. ,. /11,11.•F.- 1 '•;.: 7 ...........,..../V. '.. : .... ' ,7. .', I .,7' .,.,/-..,,,,'' exT) I I .'":"i`:, • ,› • 4 ,•-1 24' --'--- : . 1 , , . 24' ;,.--""..14. 24' ,, I b. .,,,„ ,, ..., .,,, le, . 24' 'S, 24 ,..----- „- 24. ,v • • ,•', --- ,,•,„/---- ,, „ , , ,),••••,), , . PEDESTRit,N 0, • 4NV -•:'•;',..."1 •• ••••••'•- p-V'N• ." ,-_, •'''''e,,, ',. _.i..'.1'',•Nv. 1 •,)•' .: / . ‘. PLI.ZA 4 ••:: r ] - - •- - . le. -- - ' - - - - .. ).,, 12.0.C. r.:' ' E 4po?. ..... 4 l 4 .1••••" - _ • T12 ., 30' FIRELANE / T11 . 1 1,,I„,,, ':,....0.7. SE..00. 4,• •-.. I. - , -- - - I __ __. 4 PEDESTRIAN ',• r i WALK 'N i 1 I z-------- • I SI-eel.. GALLte`l b - ..- , • .. • it 4 o S8510-74Tri: I •\ %-- --.17-2. -4-44-4-''Ir cw"iir. ___,),,. t__ • orrica7. • . Ap i • ' 1 .\\* 01 , ..0 / ....,i,.....,i- _ 122.42' I i \ . \\ . : \ ... ..., .,..- t.•.`! • •-7,7.,,,,m,----- -• - • ' '\ \C/ . •••., , \\'\‘‘.\\ , '-E/11 ,c,,,,,,,4,,,,,,,. •,..„ peae.o um..,-• 11! i i••I . A •-j -111 1 '. I 1 \ \,...:,•_:,_,..._. ,, j,, v....... c., secoxet(.-, .4,4_ee•u ,..' r \,_____ 40 Do. r word-Romp s.ai 1 COJAI0 v-- i.9 ' s\-\.` r---7 I --, I •/•,,, Ai 4.7.. * :i:IFOOk\ _Ai :4, 1 'g \ 'IL C-2 la.1 oil .2 Er , E 1 ' - -) SF. 1.- / 17_ OK 1 •ci I \...„ . 1 ri '' .,:4:, „iv:. , . ...\ .:::: les 4, yy 5 •••' '• • "•/ I ss• ::::::::: ----„,...j ---.. i ; • ,' %I . !‘,s' r- to , s‘,\:, -• • k• ?...• \ ....i N 5) In `-•' ' ' --' I C*4'`C C 0 - l 30- vt -:.x.:2 7 so 87. ‘, -'..; \1., e,LocK 130 srag. JARY PLAT if..„:21 \-,:,.., . x 1 ,,,, '5 1 .k, ......„ ^..„...! 0:0CAVIL • - . - \,\ Cs4 1 Ns. • i ,,,l : .....---.V:•„,1 Xf WENDtS-. .i- `e 'wt. tskW il CC•1480 45 •„ . n \ 01 ,7 ‘c 4 t'• 4' \.' ) .• c.gsV-;.,-s - 4 8 8 C•er._. D 11.-. \ \.,' 13 .0,,,,s tc5:0." ." I 4. 5 :rig, u o . " : 11 u s; ,,, I TgA,J1,1,11,. :.. •,,-*, •-,t..'v 0 1 i 2'''' ,\. \ s s,.,1 -v. UP •-' VI 031001-0 'g ,:45/..c."` et•-,".„ , EW- \:, wo:;,-e7.-, 004- III. 7. ,„..- Psut V 0.; - I 7eqo a5 '''...", . ' \s' .000:00s, . ''' i::i '''s- o`2 "-,;.4 1 -10- ,- ao• 1.•:•::„ '``42,,e‘ Ivo-Zo'.0 ' Z U 0 '''`. ••' • ‘•\ § s ''.:.:•." .. t ' 'i,"si ", V-.'i ' •••••f, . ZA .\. '. . 1*. - s` '\`.. _ •••;.. i kit 1...___••N _....4..........::::1:::::::::•••:::1r:s7,..:;:,;,:.: ::::.ii, ' r _ 4.„.„,....... 50 E404 T VP/0 0.1•0 LK ,, ....,4 1.... orre..eo uoer,s, •••-.-•••••• -•-••0.,..•- .1 -- 21.__•,_. g '''''s \4- ,., .., 5•0' B_DG. LINE 7-3 th 1 2€K--.__I- • ` \'''' __-_1....I. l•-• . 1 -v.._.) C./ .,.‘1 ••Nv."17 ..•••••, . A 1 • • • '..".........-STRID1'.4G ,-) 1./../ ,-.1 Fq I I 1 ,'..'I. F:4•- I I sl)..:1-',Ws'•‘' I 8-6 -•. i- .•%‘•`YN• . 111 iii I! O''---‘. ;' II. 1 1 1 1 1 1 li .*''';'....N.G ' 5;L - WALK/TRIAL SYSTEM •••,\ \-•.\•• • 'e, ' 1.:_: a %-• • i 1 '-1/4%1..1- I 7. ' N's ' . , . ' ' . I.4 Jo ‘..t,?:' . .\N.\ s .-_-_-_:..z..)-__:-___ --. ".---• --'- -- 1---,'',4.-= --r---i-- ''.14 ,14...- -----•••-- 1"\ :.: FER),,,Rzsosi..cs.,,,_62•-___ _. .. "4110-o-__ --:-:1 1 1 \ 20' E.IrrE, Ar: 'Cs' f-1 .NO 0:). T-----• - -.... ..-... ln.7------''::-------. ''''' 1.-: TrP.--••••lO•80010V000•Cf -I-- e . 290.53' 1 L.... '''''" .......(-7-*•••;,,,---;-sr"-i•,831,32•00"•*--"--"• 61,2 I , • ....m... ___..._ ___._..---•." 7'----------148910k:00-"I' -03:31.---- i . Ly-----,-------______------------ --------;7- j.:::7--- I ------___------ N89.55.08,:t'-,. 97.79 N8313.38'W 872.42 • . 8' TALL 2 P t 16.71' MONUMENT N8955 08 W •siGN -c.- 872. 42 1 (Fe. 1 7 0 9) E . Sod 7-7-/ 40K E-- BLVD_ • • e City of Southlake,Texas 0 M_EMORANDUM August 1, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: To Reject All Bids for Reconstruction Improvements of Dove St. from the West City Limits to Shady Oaks Dr. and Direct Staff to Advertise for Bids for the Remised W. Dove St. Reconstruction Improvements from the West City Limits to Shady Oaks Dr. Background Bids have been received for reconstruction improvements of Dove Street from the western city limits to Shady Oaks Drive. This project included as an alternate the reconstruction of a box culvert under Dove Street to improve and increase flows. This culvert would have been increased to the ultimate hydraulic capacity and roadway width. The apparent low bidder was Sutton Paving who bid • $197,920.40 for the paving and $17,050 for the box culvert for a total bid of$214,970.40. were opened a representative from Sutton Paving after the bids e e p told our consultant (Dunaway Associates)and our Capital Project Coordinator Shawn Poe that Sutton had made an error in the bid price of the box culvert. Sutton claimed that they were confused by the plans and only bid for a single box culvert rather than a triple box culvert. They informed Dunaway and the City that they could not accept an award based upon the bid price, but would accept a contract if that bid item were tripled(single box vs. triple box). This would result in a total bid price of$249,070.40 Options Several options present themselves for this situation: 1) Reject all bids and readvertise. The second low bidder also claimed some confusion regarding the box culvert details. They assumed the worst case scenario and bid the proper triple box culvert. 2) Reject the bid of Sutton Paving without prejudice (do not call the bid bond) and award the contract to the second low bidder(Sunmount Corporation -- $274,232.00). 3) Award the contract to Sutton Paving based upon their bid of$214,970.40. If Sutton refuses • to sign the contract, the City would be within their rights to keep the bid bond and to use this 10D-1 s S CURTIS E. HAWK DOVE ST.RECONSTRUCTION AUGUST 1, 1997 PAGE 2 bond to defray the expense of awarding the bid to the second bidder. The difference between the two lowest bidders is $59,261.60. The value of the bid bond provided by Sutton Paving is 5% of the bid ($10,748.52). Funding/Fiscal Impact The Capital Improvement Budget included $222,680 from the 1993 Road Bond Issue. There is additional funding available from Critical Drainage Structure Fees from the development in the drainage basin. Recommendation Staff recommends that the bids for this project be rejected and that City Council authorize staff to readvertise this project for bid. Staffs recommendation is based on the fact that there was confusion regarding the scope of the box culvert. Staff is familiar with Sutton Paving and we do not believe that this contractor purposely submitted a faulty bid. It is our opinion that the City will be best S served by rebidding this project with the revised, clarified plans. Please place this on the Regular City Council Agenda for August 5, 1997 for City Council review anizl-,nsi ration. Attachments: Bid Tabulation Map Exhibit M:.W P.FILES\STREETS\PD BLIC DO V E'RECON-RE.W PD S 10D-2 • • • •.= ' s PAVING-DOVE ROAD-BASE BID Reynolds Asphalt& Sutton&Associates, Inca Sunmount Corporation Construction Co. ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT QUANTITY PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID PAVING-DOVE ROAD 1 Mobilization I LS $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 Utility Adjustment 1 LS $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00' $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 3 Project Designation Sign 1 EA S 700.00 $ 700.00 S 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 480.00 $ 480.00 2-inch Asphalt Overlay to include Pavement 4 950 TN $ 35.70 $ 33,915.00 $ 29.00 $ 27,550.00 $ 34.65 $ 32,917.50 Cleaning and Tack Coat Application 5 Pavement Replacement and Repair 800 SY S 31.40 $ 25,120.00 $ 30.00 , $ 24,000.00 $ 53.60 $ 42,880.00 6 Type"D"Flexbase Material(for pavement leveling) 600 TN S 45.00 , S 27,000.00 $ 27.50 $ 16,500.00 _ $ 42.00 $ 25,200.00 7 Right-of-way Clearing 1.2 AC $ 7,000.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 19,200.00 $ 20,450.00 $ 24,540.00 8 Pavement Milling 275 LF $ 16.40 $ 4,510.00 $ 10.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 9.70 $ 2,667.50 9 Drive Reconstruction 1,037 SY $ 11.80 $ 12,236.60 $ 10.00 $ 10,370.00 $ 9.40 $ 9,747.80 10 18-inch Class III RCP Culvert with installation 285 LF $ 39.60 $ 11,286.00 $ 40.00 $ 11,400.00 $ 58.00 $ 16,530.00 II 24-inch Class III RCP Culvert with installation 100 LF $ 51.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 55.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 63.00 $ 6,300.00 12 30-inch Class III RCP Culvert with installation 40 LF $ 67.10 $ 2,684.00 $ 70.00 S 2,800.00 S 84.00 $ 3,360.00 13 18-inch Headwall with Installation 22 EA $ 500.00 S 11,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 720.00 $ 15,840.00 14 24-inch Headwall with Installation 6 EA $ 550.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 600.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 800.00 $ 4,800.00 15 30-inch Headwall with Installation 2 EA $ 610.00 $ 1,220.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 2,050.00 16 36-inch Headwall with Installation 2 EA $ 660.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 4,200.00 17 Roadway Markings to include Painting,Marking, 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,650.00 $ 4,650.00 Reflectors,Buttons,etc. 18 Hydromulch/Sccding 5854 SY $ 1.20 $ 7,024.80 $ 0.50 $ 2,927.00 $ 0.60 $ 3,512.40 Silt Fence for Pollution Prevention 19 As Directed by the inspector 700 CY $ 2.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 3.00 $ 2,100.00 `$ 3.20 $ 2,240.00 20 Hay Bale Dike for Pollution Prevention -As 100 LF $ 10.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3.00 $ 300.00 $ 8.00 $ 800.00 Directed by the Inspector 21 Topsoil 67 CY $ 20.00 $ 1,340.00 $ 30.00 $ 2,010.00 $' 28.50 $ 1,909.50 I I:\W P\95\9513800\IIID.TAI3 •PAVING A ING-DOVE ROAD-BASE BID Reynolds Asp alt& Sutton& Associates, Inc. Sunmount Corporation Construction Co. ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT QUANTITY PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID 22 Earthwork-Unclassified road and borrow ditch 500 CY $ 10.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 8.00 $ 4,000.00 excavation 23 Metal Beam Guard Fence 150 LF $ 30.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 16.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 28.00 $ 4,200.00 24 Concrete Rip-Rap 20 CY $ 40.00 $ 800.00 $ 80.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 270.00 $ 5,400.00 27 12" Class III RCP Culvert with installation 65 LF $ ... 28.60 $ 1,859.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 58.00 $ 3,770.00 28 12" Headwall with installation 6 EA $ 360.00 $ 2,160.00 ' $ 350.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 SUBTOTAL BASE BID- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $ 188,475.40 $ 181,207.00 $ 236,794.70 PAVING-DOVE ROAD OPTION 1 to BASE BID 23 Pavement Milling/Mixing with Cement and Compaction 9,000 $ 3.20 $ 28,800.00 $ 2.75 $ 24,750.00 $ 3.50 $ 31,500.00 25 2-inch Type"A"Coarse Base 1,050 $ 35.50 $ 37,275.00 $ 28.50 $ 29,925.00 $ 34.65 $ 36,382.50 DEDUCT ITEM 5 Pavement Repair and Replacement 800 SY $ 31.40 $ 25,120.00 $ 30.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 53.60 $ 42,880.00 6 Type"D"HMAC for Pavement Leveling 600 TN $ 45.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27.50 $ 16,500.00 $ 42.00 $ 25,200.00 8 Pavement Milling 275 LF $ 16.40 $ 4,510.00 $ 10.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 9.70 $ 2,667.50 TOTAL AMOUNT BID-PAVING-DOVE ROAD OPTION 1 to BASE BID $ 9,445.00 $ 10,525.00 $ 2,865.00 TOTAL BID-PAVING-DOVE ROAD-OPTION 1 w/BASE BID $ 197,920.40 $ 191,732.00 $ 233,929.70 PAVING-DOVE ROAD-ALTERNATE 2 26 6' X 5' RCB Culvert 8.5 LF $ 210.00 $ 1,785.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 38,250.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 22,100.00 26A 6' X 5' RCB Culvert Headwalls 2 EA $ 3,300.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 6,840.00 $ 13,680.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID-DOVE ROAD ALTERNATE 2 $ 8,385.00 $ 58,250.00 $ 35,780.00 PAVING-DOVE ROAD-ALTERNATE 3 H:\WP\95\9513800\BID.TAB 0 ---7-110----- lik--- . PAVING- DOVE ROAD-BASE BID Reynolds Asphalt & Sutton& Associates, Inc. Sunmount Corporation Construction Co. ITEM DESCRIPTION APPROX. UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT QUANTITY PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID 26 6' X 5' RCB Culvert 26 LF $ 180.00 $ 4,680.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 68,900.00 $ 1,570.00 $ 40,820.00 26A 6' x 5' RCB Culvert 2 EA $ 3,300.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 6,460.00 $ 12,920.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID-DOVE ROAD-ALTERNATE 3 , $ 11,280.00 $ 88,900.00 $ 53,740.00 PAVING - DOVE ROAD-ALTERNATE 4 26 10' x 6' RCB Culvert 55 LF $ 310.00 $ 17,050.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 82,500.00 $ 1,295.00 $ 71,225.00 26A 10' x 6' RCB Culvert Headwall 2 EA $ 4,700.00 $ 9,400.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 37,000.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 22,200.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID-DOVE ROAD ALTERNATE 4 $ 26,450.00 $ 119,500.00 $ 93,425.00 BASE BID TOTAL $ 188,475.40 $ 181,207.00 $ 236,794.70 P OPTION 1 TOTAL $ 9,445.00 $ 10,525.00 $ 2,865.00 TOTAL BASE BID AND OPTION 1 $ 197,920.40 $ 191,732.00 $ 239,659.70 :42:`� �� 4.®r Pam417:, BID SUMMARY APPROVED BY: . a � A i ifiME, E. DEOTTE 2C/Aa... C.Jam E. DeOtte, P.E., R.P.L.S. �9s��►�.. .svi, ,'�\,; Vice residentIsiriiil 0 ,l�Q ';"�Y��� wayAssociates, Inc. H:\WP\95\9513800\BID.TAB '` West Dove Street \ I I • \*) • • • • l I \ I \ /I \ O.O• III7�\ /// \ Y + ... / \ //I f \ //I 'I I \ I I • • \ ` III ..... --. t ....-"' \\k \r. J , ,1 , . A .. ���I___,_ . .: . i',Nif CityO Southiake f s , I -I - I 411. ,_ 1 . wii West Dove Street it ' _-.6 -77 i____ 4 w In LlibcP - • 11 \\ Reconstruction .,.? i 1 =____ A 1 u v. g 1/4- ii 6 "le. �11 , is n Public Works - GIS 1 r. City of Southlake,Texas S MEMORANDUM July 31, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Upcoming Charter Election Mayor Stacy asked that this item be placed on the agenda as a reminder of the upcoming Charter Election to be held on November 4, 1997. When last discussed the attached list of suggested charter amendments was determined by the Council Committee. The Council Committee consists of Mayor Stacy, David Harris, and Ralph Evans. In order to have a Special Election on November 4, 1997 (the next regular election day) the election must be called no later than 45 days prior to the election (September 20, 1997) or no sooner than 75 days prior to the election (August 21, 1997). Please keep those dates in mind so that there is enough time prior to the election for proper preparation by myself and the City Attorney who will be preparing the language for the propositions for the ballot. SMayor Stacy asked that Council and staff look over the second amended list of City Charter revisions, making suggestions or changes to the Council committee. If you have questions, please let me know. /sl • Second Amended City Charter Revision 11:11011-1 OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY • Combine 1.16 and 1.17 and have the new section refer to the Department of Pub is a ety. • Delete 2.03 entirely. • Clean up 2.02 to omit references to seats being elected in even or odd numbered years. • Amend 2.05 so to provide that council members receive $500/month and the mayor receives $750/month. • Amend 2.09 to provide for the ability of the city to cancel or move the regular meetings after posting notice of same. • Amend 2.11 to allow for votes to be taken by electronic device provided that in instances where the capacity of chambers is exceeded or at the request of a member of staff or the council the vote shall confirmed audibly by the city secretary. • Amend 3.02 to provide that all members of boards and commissions created by the charter or council shall serve at the pleasure of council and such members may be removed by a vote of the majority of counsel unless this provision is in conflict with any law or statute of the State. In the event such a conflict exists, State law shall control. • Amend 3.02 to provide that all members of boards and commissions covered in this section shall serve without compensation. Vacancies on any board or commission will be filled by council appointing a replacement to fill the unexpired term. No member of any board or commission shall hold any other salaried or elected City office. • Amend 3.11 to allow for the passage of ordinances at any duly noticed meeting of council • • Amend 3.13(a) to dispense with the requirement that caption of ordinances be read at council meetings unless requested by a member of council of the public. • Amend 3.11(a) to allow for the passage of zoning requests limiting zoning to SF 1 A on the consent agenda without any public hearing unless said hearing is requested by a member of staff. council or the public. • Amend 7.22 to allow election by plurality. • Amend 11.03 to provide that members of the planning and zoning commission serve at the pleasure of council, and may be removed by a vote of the majority of council. • Amend 11.03 to delete para 2. • Amend 11.04 to reflect that the purpose of the planning and zoning commission is to act in an advisory board to the counsel in areas as designated by the council in enabling ordinances. Note that the duties of the commission may include all areas found in the current provision. • Delete 11.05 • Amend 11.06 to modify time line in (d) to reflect revisions as necessary. • Amend 12.04 to require that all boards and commissions maintain minutes which shall be public records. Do general clean up to provide that the charter complies with the appropriate statutes and ordinances of Texas law. Probably can be done at reprinting without voter approval. t 01-) City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 31, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Discussion Item, Pitched Roof Regulations Attached please find a copy of Councilmember Fawks' memorandum and Ordinance Request form that asked that this item be placed on the Council's August 5th agenda for discussion. Also attached is a copy of Bedford's "CSED,"Cheek-Sparger Entrance District that he references in his memo. This overlay district encompasses land along Cheek-Sparger Road from S.H. 121 on the east to Westpark Lane on the west. Note particularly paragraphs (g) and (h) of Section 24b.7, Development Standards. These paragraphs address roof design standards. Structures which are 5,000 s.f. or less are required to be constructed with l! a pitched roof. Those structures greater than 5,000 s.f. must provide mechanical screening which simulates a sloping gabled roof. hould you have questions regarding this item, please call Councilmember Fawks at 424-1999 or me at :1-5581, extension 743. KPG enc Memorandum from Councilmember Fawks Ordinance Request Form Bedford's "CSED" Ordinance IIR - 1 REQUEST FORM - Ordinances & Other Projects lease fill out the information related toyour request. A disk copyof this form can be provided following q to allow you to insert your comments in typed form. Contact Kim Bush in the City Manager's office at (817) 481-5581, ext 702. SHORT TITLE: PITCHED ROOF REGULATIONS TYPE OF PROJECT: Ordinance: New Ordinance , Minor Revision , Major Revision . Master Plan Component: New Item , Minor Revision , Major Revision . Project: New Project , Minor Revision , Major Revision REQUESTED BY: Gary Fawks Date of Request: 7/30/97 Citizen CC Yes P&Z ZBA PB SPIN Staff Other Board or Group: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 411 2. 3. General Comments: 1. Council has repeatedly expressed concerns regarding flat and built up roofs on development within the Corridor Overlay Zone. 2. On two occasions we have discussed including pitch roof requirements in our ordinances (assisted care and gas stations at P&Z). 3. The Council had concerns regarding the current requirements for mechanical screening on rooftops which allow boxes or panels to be used as a screening device (reference Wendy's at 1709 & Davis). List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. City of Bedford Overlay Regulations si. L:\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRNI\PITCHEDI.WPD July 30. 1997 Page 1 of /A-- 1 .Ju1 31 -97 09: 26A 817 421 2653 P.01 S Memo ltbe CURTIS HAWK Five nee GARY FAWKS CCe SANDY LeGRAND Date: July 31, 1997 lbw PITCHED ROOF REGULATIONS I understand that during discussion of the 'Gas Station Ordinance' at the Planning and Zoning meeting last night the issue of pitched roof requirements was again raised. As you will recall this was also an issue as we debated the Assisted Care Ordinance. and I believe that many of the same concerns have been raised by the attorneys. • It is my belief that most or all of the Councilmembers feel we need to address this issue, and I would request that this be placed on our August$agenda as a discussion item. I would also like for you to provide each Councilmember In the packet with a copy of the Bedford Cheek Sparer Overlay Regulations ( Sandy was able to get a copy for me last month from their City Secretary office). I believe this will be helpful background information. I am also forwarding a copy of the memo I faxed to Community Development regarding Impervious Coverage. I do not believe I previously taxed you a copy. lei � 6t.5r • •Page 1 i-7- V T-g4L abaci :ai SIC ate.t2YZi.:h'Y XanYds-XZZHJ .Ca�J« 'q4Z oar' 'L arzrz Y L:oT4vinbag uoTET TpgnS pao;pog To f1T0 ar,+, cr; seem/ s:gaz;eac cv paT;T; PT eeeza sq TTvge 88.8s4 36;;1q advcwpcv'I •cseanrn.o 1-Co; (OC) Al-::ga uo paauv'd agbtsq n-r 4.aa; (ZT) antawy pup zrdTtvo YouT (£) se=ga ;o oaazz uTvauoo TTWSB za;;nq sTg: 'papTnozd aq ;gnu/ prow •baauoz3 ILT .Cer►g578 •t pus zsb:vdS -xaav, buoty qz:u ;o )(ovq xoz; pasnevec z•;;nq advowpuvT ;oo; (OZ) .C;uana t' .v :ATdds TT-tx ba-^o'to; acz wan .rrn5aw bazdrapaa7 'o£ cor3=es Io szawszTtbaz aqa o; uoTlTpp• uI f tgoi_LY'i(i flKId[a=tV1 9-cur -vuor;probsy baTp*o'I pus LuTvwd '9t avFa-NeS 68S ISROLLYI11D:X 7tiZ511rid S'g4Z 'zac;; (04) Alto; aq LTsgs q-'no ;o ',peg enz; pv.^.tsoaut pal/A ;uoz; am=771w •q •';6a; (S£) m-Jcew •v idtddv TT?n butno-to; aq- suor;arnbag veil' pas ;qb••g 'CZ ao73oas 3o sasraeaz;mb•z aqz oz 120T4TPPw aI &s oIS1f'I15D32i `dTZi'Y Chv S89ITH i'g1Z •pe;;Tcuzad aq ocis TTs'gs _oTz;sTp bcTAt r= aq; u7 pe;;-uzad se sasn dzosseooy -tarn TvdrourSd pea;Tcuad „o arnpagos '9 uo7aDak c; s�-s;eTp 5u 7kizapcn erg; zo; peasTT sawn •qz ;o ezoui zo ciao zo; :daaxs pasa;Tv zo pa::.-.=an=noaz 'pa;onz;cuoc 'ps;oaza •q zaz;sezaq Track buTpttnq ou pus pasn eq ttvgs oust so b'u?PTTnq ou ',CvTz•no 4-0jz4s7C aoarrnrj zgbsvds--vaagJ Qa"S� aqa uI TSS C'g,z '(;Icirqx2 pagovz=tf o ) as•n aT4 uo our/ xxedpc.nit o; ';sea arg uo in AvAgbjg mom; prow zabzvdg-1(aagz ;o Avrti-;o-agbTz frq ZtoTZTpps uI •a0 T;TPpy -' W-T'H T X00tq S Puy 'f se slot 4o Z-v den_-na •o. •Y'w'J pm? -H'H'g it4 sA BS 3o uoTzzod v :uoT1Tpy7j ;aaz-ys nTTWW T X(00T11 I "+a'I 'CS 'S 'SR) '11Z24 'LET 'ZH4 s;ovzL baTeq Pus aua l '{zedpooh o; TLT Ashgs' TH mar; zobzvdS_>v.erD bu7zz.agv seTz.zedosd :rotio; se pagjzneap cvxel, 'Xzanop :uszzez, 'pzo;pe8 ;o 1,47z ants uTqlTn pe;m4TE Puat ;o sTaczed pre 'elovz; 'saoT •sogq ;o Tts se pe;s 6Te•p eT raze Ell:V.. TXKG`inog Z'g5Z •papjnozd ass suoT;vTnbez TvuoT;TPpv bu-TmoTTo; G T; ;oTzzcTp bu-dtzapm aqz ;o e;ueuazInb•z ant; as noTzTppa uT •pzo eg ;o .C.TJ oqz o; aouvzaco aqz ;v zoo-zsco psog z•bzrdS-xeaR0 si; ;o zaswdoT•nsp ;uaasTcuoo pun eczo;' au; absznonua o; pagsTTgv;e• eT Asiza.w 1o7z;eTC socvzau^. s-abzeds-reogC C3SZ eqr, : soc'2ind T'44L LoruzsIC 3Jh'YKItd.2 W^�7`VVaS-Y:"'fiJ ,.Cam.J. 'q4Z • zO d LO:LT L66T-22- JL e?-i1Yr 17:07 P.03 • Preservation Orrfn'nce. tionally, ehrubs, berms, or a combination thereof, shall be provided between the .sees such that a screen of a minimum of three (3) feet it height shall screen the parking areas (See attached .,raphic). b. A landscape maintenance agreement shall be signed by the applicant/owner for maintenance of all landscape areas within the development. (See attached to&ibit) 24b.7 D!v*CP N'` STAN ARDS: All development located in the cSLD Cheek-Sparger Zntra nce District overlay shall comply with the following development standards. a. Walkwaye shall be provided along both sides of Cheek-Spa_-ger Road. Walkways i shall be placed in a meandering pattern within the twenty (20) foot landscape buffer (See attached graphic). The width of these walkways shall be a mini.mum of four (4) feet. When located closer than foe: and one-half (4.5) feet from back of curb, the minimum width *hall be five (5) feet. All walkways roast maintain a distance of four (4) feet tram the back of the curb. b. A six (6) foot patterned concrete / pave-stone walkway of uniform color and style throughout the district shall be provided at all street and drive crossings. he walkway shell be aligned with sidewalk locations at the intersections of street and drive crossings. S c. All building frontage exteriors shall be constructed of a min: of seventy-five (75) percent masonry material, exclusive of windows and docra including the area above the first floor ceiling plate line. All building side or reax exteriors shall be constructed of a minimum of seventy (70) percent masonry material, exclusive of windows and doors, including the area above the first floor ceiling plate line. In no case shall more than fifty (50) percent of each exterior wall be constructed of glace material. masonry material shall include 4" by a" modular bricks, decorative block, split face stone construction, or natural stone. Masonry materials shall be of earth tones and shall be 210-elitted to the Planning and zoning Commission for recommendation and to the City Council for approval. d. All ground mounted equipment shall be screened from view with masonry construction similar to the primary str ctu.:e. All roof mounted equipment shall be as indicated in 24b.7.q. e. All sigaage located along Cheek-Sparger Road shall be ground mounted monument style signage. No neon signs vlil be permitted. The maximum height *hail be six (6) fest, including structure and sign. The maximum square footage shall be fifty (50) square feat. The structure of the sign shall be constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure. Pole signs, meeting the 24b, "CSLD' CHTSX-SPAF.ZR EX:PA DISTRICT Page 241.-2 J1 L-07-1 99? 17:08 P • requirements of the City of Bedford Sign O:riina^ce, shall be permitted on any lot that frcnta oa the frontage road of Highway 121. f. Any canopy system m;:st provide caln:ns constructed of similar masonry material as t:e primary structure. g. on structures greater than 5,000 square feet, mechanical roof screens shall be constructed to simulate a eloping gabled roof, and `hail be constructed of batten or standing seam metal, slate, or tile, and shall be consistent throughout the district. Such roof acroeas shall screen all mechanical eq iprsent from view from any public right-of-way. Line of sight drawings will be required to illustrate that adequate screening is provided. ( h. On structures 5,000 square feet or less, pitched roof construction vile be required. 8o flat or built up roof construction Shall be permitted. i. Exterior lighting in parking lots shall by uniform in type and material throughout the district. Exterior lighting located along the g 4 9 q pedestrian walkway located within the twenty (20) foot landscape buffer shall be provided. Coustructioa material for light fixtures along this pedestrian walkway shall utilise decorative type poles and fixtures. (See attached diagram) . The developer shall provide a lighting plan and photometric analysis to ensure adequate lighting. • 24b.0 SITE FLAN, All Zoning Districts underlying the CSZD" Cheek-spa_-qer Entrance District mstat have a City Council approved sits plan before a building permit will be issued. Such site plan must be wibnitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to presentation of the site plan to the City Council for approval. Such site plan must mama-_ the requirements for site plans, which are detailed in Section 28 Site Plan Requirements of thin Ordinance. In addition, a color schedule shall be submitted showing the colors to be used for all improvements proposed on the site, including buildings, signage, light fixtures, accessory structures etc. Color rendering may be provided to illustrate the color schedule. • 24b.9 PROCEDURE: The City Council, by en affirmative vote, may CC CIA after public hearing and proper notice to all parties affected, and after recommendations from the Plxnning and zoning Commission, may approve requests for amendments to section 24b to avoid unnecessary difficulty in the p,veJsed development. 24b, "CSEJ" CHEEX-SPARGER L'�^.RA.'7CE DISTRICT Page 24b-7 r • • • ,. 1 ,u,iai,I'l ill 'IlI' 4 1111,IA .,- IQ District Boundary Lines n o r # h . N 0 C R4, MO wrote CRYW ompo li 1rG-1AAa11 ID 1 #11. r m I is. lis.......po.„ m a1i N 0 041*1‘1ti il • M M i i '�o 0 __J si iii 'vi Of I Mt Me ii II II w a► I I Boundary Exhibit of CO co cheek-Sparger Entrance Overlay District N A ($1 t► • JUL-0'7-1997 17:09 P.06 1 • ae �► -..,., ' 171- r. `5W_ErVARD' T'RE TREES 50' APART "'`.a.-'"''� �`- �"..- , A. (3. GAL 1P'1EK 12' 1 .16+1T) WY -- --,'�a•r. -'�- --I -= U. '1IP _.-..a r ' - _ ` i � W - - ,86 AJ- /O r. y_ �� ;,'i.`'.��"lip TO sG . PARKIN& CURS FOR ...# b#2OpdD GOYIM z -07EYt**4 - • Typical Section Through Landscape Buffer • A W i) Approximately 36 inches A p p ro x imat a ly 15 feet • Note: Lighting Standards for polies and fbct ures shall be similar in nat ure with • appurtenances constructed at the x Bedford Cid School project. Comparables J. shall be subrriit t ed with site plan application Y for approval. Typical Lighting Standards or Comparables • SECTION 24b, 'CSED' C✓HEEc-SPARG T ANCEDISTRICT 24b-5 - X JUL-e7-1957 17:09 P.ea III Maintenance Agreement for The"CSED"Chock-Spar-ecr Entrance District Landscape Ares In compliance with Section 24b. "CSED" Cheek-Spar gerEntrance District Subsection 24b. 6 Landscaping Regulations b. this landscape maintenance agreement.acknowledged by the owners of record and approved by the City shall be signed by the applicant/ owner for maintenance of all landscape areas within any development located within the area known as the"CSED"Cheek•Sparger Entrance District more specifically identified in Subsection 24b.2 Boundary of Area. This agreement shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any right or interest in the pt upei iy described abov c. Article I Defini ti ores (a) "City"shall mean the City of Bedford. (b) "Landscaped Area"is that area that is required to be landscaped as defined in Subsection 24b.6 Landscape Regulations a. It includes all landscaping located bath of curb in the interior of the devclopmc t. (c) "Lot" shall mean each of the tracts lying within the the area known as•'CSED Chccl:-Sparser Entrance District more specifically described in Subsection 24b2 Boundary of Area. (d) 'Maintcnancc"shall include maintenance of sidewalks,lighting systems.and sprinkler systems.and the are 110 of trees.shrubs, grass and all other live plant material. (c) 'Owner" shall mean every person or entity who is a record owner of a fee or ur divided fee interest its any lot. (f) "Property"shall mean those tracts or lots described in Subsection 24b.2 Boundary of Area. Article II Maintenance of Prow Section 1.Owner Obliaatioas Each Owner shall, at his sole cost and expense,maintain and repair his Lot and the improvements situated thereon.keeping the same in good condition and repair. Section 2. F,nforcenient by City In the event that any Owner shall fail to maintain and repair his lot, the City, in addition to all other remedies available to it, shall have the right, through its agents and employees.following written notice and appeal. to enter upon said Lot and to repair,maintain,and restore the Lot. The Cost of such maintenance shall be recovered by mains of mechanic lien filed in behalf of the City. ON 24b, "cszc c ZZX-SPARf1R ENP':P.ANCZ C:SM.IC:0Paq• 24b-6 i - `1 .- Ju_-07-1957 17:Cc P.@8 • Article 11I Mai ntenxrtcz of L.-imam/red Area Section 1.Itnrxnvetnents to Landscaped Area Capon the issuance of a certificate of occapancy, the Owner of each tract shall accept the responsibility for the improvcutents and maintenance of the Landscaped Area Improvements to the I aildt.-sped Area shall be completed within six(6)months from the issuance daze of the certificate of occupancy. Section 2. M intettance Fund (a) The Owners shall establish and maintain an adequate maintenance fund for the periodic maintenance.repair and replacement of improvements to the Landscaped Area (b) The minimum fund balance shall be equal to the estimated amount necessary to sustain proper maintenance for three (3) montdu. This estimated balance shall be adjusted annually as additional Landscaped Arca is improved_ (c) The fund shall be placed in escrow with the City and in the event that the treed for maintenance is caused by the wilful or negligent act of as owner, the City shall cause such maintenance to be performed and such expense shall be deducted from the fund hhlAnre. (d) The City shall notify the Owners of all deductions form the fund and the Owners shall make necessary arrangements for securing its minimum balance. S Signature-Owner of Property Date Signature-City of Bedford Date State of Texas: County of Before the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for County.Texas on this day personally appa.arc d, ,known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the puipr.. and cvnsidcrauons therein expressed Given under my hand and seal of office this the day of 1997. Notary Public in and for the state of Teas My commission expires: . ilk IOU 2tb, `cz n" C�.'R-S??.FCZR TfrI'P712v DISTRICT Pa 24b-7 4+ TOTPC P. l/n-to • City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Discussion Item, Ordinance No. 480-BB, Maximum Lot Coverage and Maximum Impervious Coverage Attached are changes to the zoning ordinance regarding maximum lot coverage and maximum impervious coverage as recommended by the Impervious Coverage Work Group(comprised of Councilmember Fawks and Commissioners Creighton and Edmondson). Although I have not been present during any of their discussions on these matters,I have prepared the first draft of Ordinance 480-BB based on Councilmember Fawks' memorandum and the work group's recommended changes. These changes actually reflect five (5) changes to the maximum lot coverage requirement rather than the one change to the C-3 district as noted in Councilmember Fawk's memo. The four(4) additional changes will be addressed below. Please recall that the definition of impervious coverage (as approved with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480-Y) is as follows: "IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE - the combined area occupied by all principal and accessory buildings, , and paved parking, sidewalks, and driveway areas." Structures Section 1 establishes the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 40% of the total lot area in the "MF-1," Two Family Residential District. Section 2 changes the maximum lot coverage requirement in the "MF-2," Multiple Family Residential District from 50%to 40% and also establishes the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 50% of the total lot area. Section 3 changes the maximum lot coverage requirement in the"C-3,"General Commercial District from 60% to 50% and also establishes the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 65% of the total lot area. Section 4 changes the maximum lot coverage requirement in the`B-1," Business Service Park District and the "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District from being determined by the Commission and Council during Concept Plan review to 50%. Section 5 establishes both the maximum lot coverage requirement of 50% and the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 65% of the total lot area in the "HC," Hotel District. Currently, the only development standards in place in the "HC" District are the height and yard requirements. ection 6 establishes the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 65% of the total lot area for the CS," Community Service District, "0-1," Office District, "C-1," Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2,"Local Retail Commercial District, "B-1,"Business Service Park District and the"B-2"Commercial Manufacturing District. 0C-7 • City of Southlake,Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Ordinance No. 480-BB (Impervious Coverage) euly 29, 1997 Page Two Section 7 establishes the maximum impervious coverage requirement of 70% of the total lot area for the "C-4," Arterial Mall Commercial District, "I-1," Light Industrial District, and "I-2," Heavy Industrial District. Section 8 deletes the maximum impervious coverage provision in the specific use permit ("SUP") requirements for personal care facilities recently established in 480-Y. With the adoption of Ordinance No. 480-BB, each personal care facility would then have to comply with the underlying zoning district requirement as set forth in this ordinance revision. Section 9 amends"Appendix A, Schedule of District Regulations"to reflect the changes to the maximum lot coverage requirements and creates a new column for the new maximum impervious coverage requirements. Sections 10 - 16 are the standard boilerplate included in all ordinances. Please place this item on the Council's August 5th agenda for their discussion and direction to forward the amendment to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review and consideration. Should you have ilkuestions regarding this amendment, please call Councilmember Fawks (424-1999), Commissioner reighton (488-1390), Commissioner Edmondson (488-3144) or me at 481-5581, extension 743. KPG enc Councilmember Fawks' Memorandum Recommendations of Impervious Coverage Work Group Ordinance Request Form Ordinance No. 480-BB 0 ORDINANCE REQUEST FORM *lease fill out the followinginformation related toyour request for consideration of a new ordinance or q revision to an existing ordinance. A disk copy of this form can be provided to allow you to insert your comments in typed form. Contact Kim Bush in the City Manager's office at (817) 481-5581, ext 702. SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance - Impervious Coverage Regulations TYPE OF PROJECT: Ordinance: New Ordinance , Minor Revision , Major Revision Master Plan Component: New Item , Minor Revision , Major Revision Project: New Project , Minor Revision , Major Revision REQUESTED BY: Scott Martin/Bill Kemp/Gary Fawks Date of Request: 7/30/97 Citizen CC Yes P&Z ZBA X PB SPIN Staff Other Board or Group: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Run-off control /mitigation to lessen drainage impacts. 2. To lessen erosion of natural stream beds 3. Although the landscape ordinance sets minimum parameters for landscape areas, no current 0 regulations address overall total impervious coverage allowed. -------- List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Will lessen financial demands to "concrete over" our natural stream beds. 2. Will help maintain our existing native trees through keeping their critical root zone open for water & gas exchange. 3. The Committee attempted to be mindful the maximum building coverage allowed as we drafted these proposed requirements, however the reality of the situation is that rarely if ever is the maximum lot coverage ever achieved, therefore it may be very realistic to decrease the maximum allowed impervious coverage in many districts. General Comments: Southlake citizens do not want to live amongst a"sea of parking" as is allowed in most other communities. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Draft ordinance prepared by Karen Gandy based on workgroup recommendations. S L:\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\IMP-COV2.WPD July 30, 1997 Page 1 of 1 (I C • Memorandum Dottie 07/03197 Tot Karen Gandy CC: C. Hawk, G. Last, D. Edmondson,A.Creighton Franc Gary Fawks Rt6 Impervious Coverage Regulations in an effort to help address the numerous challenges related to drainage and runoff that face our community, and in accordance with the City Council priority Ilst, our work group has prepared the attached list of proposed impervious coverage regulations for each zoning district. We believe that the best way to handle this will be to amend each of the zoning district's development • regulations as opposed to creating a new ordinance. Please note there is one recommended change to the maximum building coverage (in the C3 District). The definition of impervious coverage that you used In 480-Y would appear to be appropriate for these regulations as well. I do believe we will need to repeal the percentage included in 480 - Y as a part of this action so it may be governed by the underiying zoning district. Please have these drafted into ordinance form and placed on the Council agenda for July 15, 1997 as a discussion tern. This will allow the Council the opportunity to discuss the concept of these changes prior to sending the ordinance to P&Z, and hopefully thereby expedite the process. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments. I will be in town through July ell tf we need to discuss this any further next week. REC'D J U L 8 71997 /17 M'1 M17 tO' d £S9Z LZb LIE? 1d£b =80 L6-LO- Lnr • Impervious Coverage Regulations Proposed Coverage Limits District Bldg Cover Imp Cover 0-1 50% 65% 0-2 50% 65% C-1 50% 65% C-2 50% 65% C-3 50% 65% C-4 60% 70% B-1 50% 65% B-2 50% 65% 1-1 50% 70% 1-2 50% 70% HC 50% 65% MF1 30% 40% MF2 40% 50% CS 50% 65% • • • ORDINANCE NO. 480-BB AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480,AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; AMENDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS REGARDING LOT COVERAGE; ADDING CERTAIN SECTION REGARDING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE; DELETING "IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE" FROM SECTION 45.9; AMENDING "APPENDIX A" REGARDING LOT COVERAGE AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FORA PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,the city has adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the city; and WHEREAS, the city council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests of the city to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents by amending Ordinance No. 480 as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the city council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480BB-LORD 1 • SECTION 1. Section 16.5(k) of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby added to establish a maximum impervious coverage requirement to read as follows: "Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed forty (40%)percent of the total lot area." SECTION 2. Section 17.5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph "e," maximum lot coverage, and by adding paragraph "1," maximum impervious coverage to read as follows: e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50%)forty (40%)percent of the lot area. 1. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall • not exceed fifty(50%)percent of the total lot area." SECTION 3. Section 22.5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph "e," maximum lot coverage, and by adding paragraph "1," maximum impervious coverage to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding aixty (60%)fifty (50%) percent of the lot area. 1. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed sixty-five (65%)percent of the total lot area." SECTION 4. Sections 24.5 and 25.5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, are hereby amended by revising paragraphs "e," respectively to read as follows: • "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: As approved by the City Council after a recommendation L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONMG\480BB-I ORD 2 • by the Planning and Zoning Con 'i3sien purstrant to Coneept Plan Review with , environmental impaet and compatibility of this project with adjacent land uses. All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50%)percent of the lot area." SECTION 5. Section 28.5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding the following paragraphs, "e" and"f," establishing maximum lot coverage and maximum impervious coverage to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50%)percent of the lot area. f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed sixty-five (65%)percent of the total lot area." SECTION 6. • Sections 8.5(f), 18.5(i), 20.5 (1), 21.5(1), 24.5(p), and 25.5(i) of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, are hereby added to establish a maximum impervious coverage requirement to read as follows: "Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed sixty-five (65%) percent of the total lot area." SECTION 7. Sections 23.5(o), 26.5(1), and 27.5 (1), of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, are hereby added to establish a maximum impervious coverage requirement to read as follows: "Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed seventy (70%)percent of the total lot area." SECTION 8. Section 45.9 (f), "SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES," of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by deleting paragraph "9," Impervious • Coverage. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONTNG\4SOBB-I oRD 3 4 l • SECTION 9. • "APPENDIX A, Schedule of District Regulations" of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Maximum Lot Coverage and by adding Maximum Impervious Coverage as amended herein. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 11. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, I sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 12. Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 13. 0 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480BB-LORD 4 //C- k violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting 0 zoning yard regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 14. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 15. • The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 16. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 0 L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\48088-LORD 5 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF • , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\4SOBB-I.oRD 6 //C.- (0 W Z(DcV QNr7'RtOtn 00) F-o0(0 tn— V)CA to OO N M < O Q 33333 0 otntnr000 Z F:.:t - 0 0 0 U r N to 00 to W Nr:t� 4r m� r)cD000t0 ptnMr-000 NZZZ(!) L Q w Z J -j J _.I J J oO N O rn = U j 33 C. Z N 0 00 m'� ^ Z Z W N 0 U Q Z N Ln Q J 0 Q 0 ��� O Q�� m < 0000 0000 Q 04 N U-) LLJ O � O 00 C U N U U Z Z r- O p OO L� F- Z W 2 U O Wp O m Z ��, rn J 00 0� LO nj o L i I Z 00 zNm I Q Q Y D Z Q Q 1- �- Z Uz ^^ zZ Q. 0 pm cn E — WC�O� V)�WiQQv W QW Of Z U- oHFa-v`~'Cq U ZZ 0NZcr 'r-"-, �� Q W .aJ JzzV) �r- mNO 1 a. aQ�7-o Q E3 K I I Q Q .J C) Q0 O 6<< � Y > Z U OYJ w}- >D II 0 W 0J(Y0 O�W >CE V) 0 0 mLiaa�of _ �0D W -ow= O(n(pi���� LIJ � JY� O �?W w Q�ZZ F- Q F- W V) z OQO .�-� 0 O Q (n � J_ Cif < Y O O Z w a_ m 3 Q 0 O >' V=w � zU O w D Q=m U Y 0 W U of m Z w OJ Z W cr- Q � 0 O W Z W X 0- Q �oz� OQ-M cr O ILLJ O W W W Z cy- Z tY Q iT- W W U O � Q o� IL O Z 0- O U � za —W 0 = W H 0 of O OL.L- �V) W Z m UJI -w c� W zcr- U U J W = V R vi z ILLJ LLJQ W z V) w O LL- D V) Q Q J Q O J U O LL- 0 Q U J V) z QwC C Z W �LI W 0 �- LL.J Un ('0 O om �O tY a- � (Y W (Y O LL- LO Z O ti otf cr- U U) 2 U �Z V / o r W 00 ry (nCLQO� m0Of U p J 0 Z w T- t (f� Q Z � Wm Qo Y Z O wwOoN Z0 � re) O ZQOQMN A V) W H Q LLJ Y W 0 LLI N o J ofU N LLJ Lr (o I O Z U d. <U ~00 O LL1 W Y 5 W ZZ W W Z E- QZ�O= :2z(nw m � v w 3�N 2 Q v to OD I V) Cl- 0 Q (n W W C w� g ��� C- V) .S n W a Y W N O 3 W N O w U/)�J 1 J (D1 0 U N o tYU NO Q 2 W (0 W Lt (0 OD gFQ:. ZU ��� t0W QW U U Cl- �W->. ao o�°° OW WU wL`9 rn ~~� r7 JJ>�o W -J �?�0W Z �Y N �I- WZZ CL � WZZ N�.. W W H W F- o Z WW?0002 a- QZOOz Z D O ��zUnUrc Q �—ZV)ry Z W =cr) t" i �n k > �W II II 00 Jill J III � J Z g�QN: PI) o • CL \, \ � \ pooMAJ! N � v Q i r Of 04 • o� saz M o-a w.aM 31ee v . Q / Q � ■ � Q • \ �� 3AtV1H1(lOS 30 OLIO J,'r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ r1 .po,ca! J91 3AV-1iS3M 30 NMOl 0 W)COZr� /"rrrr w Li.- Li. Q V) V) 0, O O w p o 0 0 U-1 o 00 L<i N Q V) r- W U N a CD Un I 0 w w w Lw Ur Ur cr- = O O o rn LLJ Un Un V) r- z LJ LO N I- U .. o 0 0 Q > -1 W O J V) Cif O U Z Z U J J Q of U-LL. O= CL O W- La Li. Li Li Q (n (n (n V W O O O O O O o ck� O O O O U w m Q 000 c0 N V) N U L6 CL U) I U w w w w = Ur Ur E 00 o o J X (n V) V) N U U') LO U-) U) o :D m z � W W > Q V) U 0 U Q UZ Z w U � W z Li O Q Q O U U 13- (1) W LL.I tY LL- 01-1 Q ui U p o Q p O -1 06 W Q I V) m Un D w w f> X 0 c0 O N O •• a. (n �W � w � z V)m O Q � -i Cl.l _ I () 0 (n Z Z QJ Y Q W = m W Li Q (n (n O O W O O U � o N Q (n LLJ CD Q N N a_ V) _ O U) w I = E O W J X U) r-- U � I LO U " o Y Q W D O 0 W O Y � < O a_ O 0) I Q N 6 .Qw-J88 .Qw-J88 r. 1 c O a W a� O N L O a� U m Q 3 � � --O (o o II cv N O Eo Z3 wo U-i > L NOTES: I. This area to be dedicated for R.O.W. 2. This area is existing traveled roadway. Lot 2. Block I. Emerald Estates South Volume 388-171. Page 99 Zoned AG Dorothy M. Rockenbaugh. et al Volume 11878. Page 31 Zoned AG CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC C 1 24*42'42' 639.00' 275.60 Scale LINE BEARING DISTANCE = 50 L I N 0 1'53 00 E 1 5. 00 ' L 2 S 71'44"00-E 23.30' 0 50 100 Vicinity Map Mario Molina and wife. An ie Molina Volume 10992. Page 382 Zoned AG TANGENT 139.98' CHORD 273.47' Crawford Carroll Hall and wife. Doris Simpson Hall Volume 2644. Page 267 Zoned AG David E. Walsh. Sr. Volume 12031. Page 640 Zoned 01 ( See Note 2 ) �ocI/o .. 01 0 . \ � o god �G S6 9� 8 S9 P 0 B i CHORD BEARING S 59*22 ' 39-E N 8 9' 14 ' 00.E 208.30 N. W. Corner. Lot II. Block I. Hunter's Ridge Addition Volume 388-19 4. Page 16 w 0 0 101- m / m c 0 v W. P. Hoggue and wife. Francis Higgins Hogue \ Volume 7796. Page 1721 Zoned AG \ FIELD NOTES Field Notes for a tract of land in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of that certain tract of land conveyed to Elizabeth Higgins by deed of record in Volume 1549, Page 446, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found, said point being North 89 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds East 208.30 feet, North 01 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds East 430.50 feet, and North 56 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West 47.0 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 11, Block 1, Hunter's Ridge Addition, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-134, Page 16, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 56 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West 284.60 feet to a Bois D'Arc stake found for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West 273.80 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East 15.00 feet to a 112" iron pin found for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds East 108.10 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, at 358.00 feet a 1/2" iron pin found, in all 385.70 feet to a point in the center of Dove Road (County Road No. 3080); THENCE South 71 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds East along the center of Dove Road 23.30 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 639.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly, along said curve and along the center of Dove Road 275.60 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE South 47 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds East continuing along the center of Dove Road, 238.90 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 09 degrees 38 minutes 00 seconds West, at 35.90 feet a 1/2" iron pin found, in all 259.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3.32 acres of land, of which 0.31 acres is in use as a public road. No. 37672.GCD D/231 Preliminary Plat of _ _L Higgins Addition L OWNER/DEVELOPER an Addition to the City of Lot I Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas � Mrs. Elazabeth Hi9gins y -0 Volume 1549. Page 446 bein 3.32 acres of land n 1496 East Dove Street 9 . a) 0 0 Southlake. Texas 76092 Out of t h e > CN 0 Q) N O (817) 488-7287 N Francis Throo Survey. Abstract No. 1511. OWNER/DEVELOPER y .° >° Lot 2 Jackson L. Gentry Tarrant County. Texas rn Volume 12771. Page 548 w 2 317 Dove Creek Trail Lots Southlake. Texas 76092 Prepared June 1997 �' (817) 481-4718 "Amended J � my 1997 .J SURVEYOR ZA97-091 Clarence W. Hart. RPLS LL Area Surveying. Inc. 102 W. Trammell Street �. Fort Worth. Texas 7 AREA SURVEYINGINC. 6140 _. (817) 293-5684 Registered Professional Land Surveyors 102 W. Trammell St. • Fort Worth, Texas 76140 - (817)293 5684 J TEX ART STONE, INC VOL. 8071, PG. 1726 D.R.T.C.T 4R I N BLOCK 4P 1R BLOCK B SAM CULBURTSON BLOCK C VOL. 7650, PG. 1015 D.R.T C T. ZONED 1-1 INDUSTRIAL NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK 33 34 CAB A, SLIDE 253 D.R.T.C.T dl 0 z. z 5R1 > 1 2 'AG' 35 ,.j r ZONED AGRICULTURE L.U.D = MIXED USE GREENWOOD DRIVE ZONED SF-20A ,GILLILAND HE, LOT 1 Q L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL V z VOL 7560, PG 1015 BLOCK I COUNTRY WALK— x D.R.T C T COMMON AREA NO I m CAB. A, SLIDE 2394 36 �„ Z z w 6 P R T.C. o TO BE MAINTAINED w7 ,= BY THE HOA 230 04' 4 5 1 5'0" WIDE TYPE Q BUFFERYARD F. M. NO. 1938 i.G ALLEN SURVEY, ABST NQ. .-18 D AV I S � LV D .) I W. CAvES SURVEY ABST. NO. 500 0(750'37"W 16.81' N06'33'37•'W 33 33' ZONED AG I ZONED AG LOT 3 L�rAGRICULTURE %GRICULTURE BLOCK I 3R1 3R2 L U.0 = MIXED USE ZONED AG K RK CAROL RO�ETTA SHEEHEY OPEN SPACE & L U.D = MEDIUM AGRICULTURE VOL. 12175 ZONED AG Jnn, o COMMON ACCE S ESMT. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL W.E COUCH PG. 752 AGRICULTUREVOL 7766 D R.T.C.T AGRICULTURE PG. 306 L.U.D. = MIXED USE BERNARD COSGROVE L.U.D. = MIXED USE ZONED AG D.R.T.C.T. VOL. 3865 MICHAEL COSGROVE AGRICULTURE PG 333 VOL. 7011 cv L U.D. = MIXED USE I R D.R.T.C.T. PG. 700 OTIS COLLINS D.R.T.C.T co w VOL. 8267 N 00 28' 12"W 541.14 to PG. 1572 S89' 16'56' W 79.84' D R T.C.T. 2R BLOCK I 1.0i 4 ZONED AG N01014' 41"W 477.92 I 29� 30 31 32 Z L.0 D = MEDIUM AGRICULTURE 35' BL 302 99' DENSITY RESIDENTIAL JERRY COUCH 26 27 28 3� I L P �. N00'22'49"W 25 N- � HOLLOW � ��tn 34 M s°q HONEYSUCK,o 3o BL 7 m 35 Zf COZONED MM RCIA� o L.U.D = MIXED USE 24 " —1 Z 6 36 �S SOUTHLAKE CROSSING r` r- 30 BL r SHO �'6'� CAB. A, SLIDE 1613 CAB. A, SLIDE 1614 5 6 ` OT7ti spB CAB A, SLIDE 2425 ZONED AG 23 Q �I'm 5 a � 30 8L �' P.R.T.C.T. AGRICULTURE 3 Z o < tS s•37 L.U.D.= MEDIUM 0- " O % m DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 4 7 Z> U 2 9 W E coucH 2-2 w BLOCK 3 4 9 VOL 8713, PG 141 OCL D.RTCT a, J J J N N B L O C K 4 �` 38 Z LOT 1 NOTE BERMING ALONG THIS ZONED AG m U �m 3 8 m O -P n I J B 3 p� Iq BLOCK 1 PROPERTY LINE WITHIN AGRICULTURE /'1 p r (- 0+� THE 15' LANDSCAPE ESMT. L.U.D.= MEDIUM 21 " ); 10 m• Z m D 00N D NSITY RESIDENTI M W Z BERMING SHALL BE FLEXIBLE Y Y M BLOCK 5 - AND VARIABLE TO WORK WITH W0L COUCH Q I m m 7 4 m 39 m EXISTING GRADE AND FIELD PG 389 O 2 9 243.94'„ CONDITIONS. D.RT.CT �0 Z I s 2 I O � � � N04'08'56 W r 1 v °o m BLOCK I J Y : JOHNSON cc0 c� J s Z a o <cn < SDUTHLAKE BLVD w Z a 0 SITE' CONTINENTAL BLVD. COMMON AREA OPEN SPACE MYERS MEADOW PHASE ONE ti �o 8 J J J O > > z J � m U3 w LOCATION MAP MYERS MEADOW PHASE ONE CAB. A, SLIDE 1329 P.R.T. C. T. T 1N09I4'57'E 427.86' N00'40'58"E N00° 27'06" N 1315.27 19 1 10 I 6 5 �040 41 42 37 - - - - - - 3 BL 12 30' BL J 3 �s�. ZONED C-3 � PHASE ( BLOCK 1 '5' LANDSCAPE, SCREEN LL I S 5 1 3Q BL - 6E COMMERCIAL AND UTILITY ESMT \ 50 611 L.U.D. - MIXED USE ro AN i pq S0' 43 0 R BERT GOODE VILLAGE GREEN DRIVE LOT 44 BLOCK 1 r64'--COMMON AREA NO 4 TO BE MAINTAINEDBY THE HOAi PARK CITY OF SOUTHLAKE VOL 11696. PG 1909 Ej 10 2 3 4 11 1 6 13 14 15IN° LOT R , BLOCK 2 O � r � y 1 ` / TBRUSH WAY END BLOCK I VOL. 4359 SIR 35• �- PG. 195 COMMON AREA NO 8- 3o�BL D.R.T.C.T. ' ec 4S"e l �° 0 5" f- I - s�9 35B AMENITY CENTER T J - � 'f\ 13 3 5 8 L 3 5 8 L (� (� Al 9 BE MAINTAINED BY DEER HOLLOW BLVD L o s 8 L �s 14 25' LANDSCAPE 16 17 18 19 20 10 THE H. 0. A. 30' BL �- 30 B � � j ESMT TO HOA BLOCK 6 -->- 21 22 as 27 p� 1-I -�, --- - - ---�.,.BLO I U GRE NLEA m 7 9 2 12 I N D a s 8- _ _ 4 co CO 18CT a �� �, - 13R 14R 15R -16R ° v�� DENOTES STREET o ,5 16 17 1 L e 0`' 23 26 2�_ 6 1 .16 _ I ni _ - 14 BLOCK 2 35 BL ♦ NAME CHANGC Y D.R.T.C.T.- I �= 8 B CIl 2 -10 0. 0� m LOT -i o.� ?� R v - STONEBURY DRIVE BLLOT OC 2 - - 1 9\\. r' - c -. , _ ,.,1 10 25LANDSCAPE I w VOL R1 1492 BAKER 2326 N 5 \ f Ct COMMON 4EA NO 2 \. S - 2,� �0 s�� NI ) 5 ESMT. TO HOA i O PHASE I • So l T6 EEI�MAINTAIN O D.R.T.C.T O BY THE HOA p OD 529. 29 = - _- _ LOCK 6 cr 0 1 5 g 1 0 1 1 -%"%2 1 0 APPROX. LIMITS c3F_ THE LOCK 6 i �, �` ZONED SF - 1 c } N13 R ^ DRAINAGE 1 4 m-Y FLOODP�IN i S00'45'29" 374.47' ! N w BOCK 1 w � � -. ,L.U.D. MEDIU ,-. ) c� ESMT / 5f 1 ZON N J o POINT OF $ IN DENSITY RESIDEN IAL Y zo - rn DR INAGE SMT ENT( N I I U 0 6' m ) c I BAKER ESTATE U p o rn �L t`- ''r TRACT 8� TO E MAIN AIty 4 + 4 AB. A, SLIDE 1 75 o m TRACT >� Y THE, ,-� 30 I � I TRACT 2 TRACT 1 I ,� 16 � 5 4 Q _ MIKEL FAULKkER `-- BOBBY HARRELL m I MICHAEL CHARLES I P.R.T.C.T. m r 3 r VOL. 10331� VOL. 10462 B t f3�_!f I 2 ZONED SF-20A oC PG. 1646 } , PG. 0016 ) t I LEASE FOSTER f L.U.D. MEDI NSITY RESIDENTIAL D.R.T.C.T. D�I C.T. '35 34 `�.3 31)' VOL 9939 VOL. 7312 f m ��i� `, m 7 ; , _f . Al STATES 3 I - s o uRY I. w I 1022 PG. 1388 % - 8 } B. A, SLI 2917 Li w I �9 PH E- E F G I � D�.T.C.T D.R T.C.T. I O 5 in j,� �Qf ; o z Y P.R.T.. z cv +.r PPROX. IMITS OF HE ! - " ' O _� `� O 7 e10/0-YEA FLOODP IN 3 i c +l rn _� o In-1 ,�-�.. ; .i. -) e l 40, .A ..�i ....1. N I r- CARROLL I.S.D. �...1 o ? - tttSSSI�I - - v? �_ �s Y 00 ZONED 'CS' I I 8 i r° v ZONED SF- l A' . -� (- co 1 O ~ 1 U 40 �, m Cr L.U.D. = PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC j m Z 1 2 , -�- L.U.D. = LOW `" S ( cn 1 7 �§" o 4 z VOL. 8303, PG. 689 15' LA p ONSITY RESIDENTIAL LONGHORN H0, _ t.U.D SF LOTD zoo m D.R.T.C.T. ESMT. HOA 2' .U.D = LOW I ZONED RE -� U W ?l AIRPARK ESTATES I 1 r' ' ^''1l rn DE ITV RESIDENTIAL VOL 388-123, PG 99 A rRt< ENTIAL FISTk1 P R.T.0 f-` I o RPAR ESTATES (. L.U.D= LOW (DENSITY 40' BL ._ , E �' VOL. 388- 23. PG 99 LOT 4 1 / t r o P.R C T ~jANDON BAK BLOCK 2 I 1 �WIl�6 ll RASE. }1r492, PG. 00 x B OCK 2 I' 10 0 WIDE TYPE B / 9 c �1 COMMON AREA NO I 37 39 40 m .�%-Y { D.R}�C.T. ( 18 19 20 m> 1 2 LANDSCA D ` ,�� TO BE MAINTAINED - G�i la1 I ui I 25' LRNbLSCA it +� Z � �,- BUFAD/ ' I DED CAT, ESMT TO(jl BY THE HOA �B C 2 40' , rF ddjj�. j ' /` I I 25' LANDS I . ' p o COMMO ARE NO. 3 , i 10 ? I ESMT. TO HOA `J r� - -- ---- — - - - 1 t �T' r s �tiGu�?ry s Y AE1`,1 No 1 2 _ ? �i` 8 E 013- 5 e {" ✓. 1 O — W EAVE, SURVEY. ABST NO. 500 ---- -- 00 ti.-.PeetD. iso5 "— - - r ' — ---- — — ---- -- SO 1'05'09" E 871 08R PApEN SURVEY ABST. N0. 1255 3 2 1 BLOCK 1 SCENIC DRIVE IZONED SF-20A I CONTINENTAL PARK ESTATES VOL. 388-98, PG. 23 12 P.R.T.C.T. —Lx 13 14 AKHURST DRIVE 1 AP OX. LIMITS -YEAR FL P ) 50644 31 W 525 19' 00-54 56 E 1 - 9 10 1 2 2 PEYTONVILLE AVENUE i 1 BLOCk 1 6 33 I r l BONED RE ZONED SF-20A W 1 _ 3 4 T ESTATE (COUNTY ROAD 3088) Q ZONED SF-2 REST L L.U.D MEDIUM >_ 3 ZONED SF -IA L.U.D. MEDIUM 5 L _ MED DENSITY R DENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL o BLOCK 4 ZONED SF-20A ZONED SF -IA U D = LOW DENSITY RESIDENT)AL 1 3 2 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL w 3` ZONED SP- 1 A BILLY CURq CHIMNEY HILL PHASE 1 0 ILL' L.U.D MEDIUM L U D = LOW DENSITY RESIDEN AL 4 STONE LAKES, PHASE FOU a PARk PLACE ADDITION CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION 525 CAB. A, SLIDE 35 is SHADOWOOD S DENSITY RESIDENTIAL JOSE FRANCO CAB A, SLIDE 24�E O CAB. A, SLIDE 2575 a CAB A. SLIDE 1460 P.R.T.C.T. 1 D R T. P.R T C T a ZONED SF-20A GINGER'S KNOLL P.R T C.T VOL. 5993, PG 609 VOL- 388- 101 , PG. 68 D.R.T.C.T 2 m P.R.T.C.T 3 4 x as v 31 Z L U.D. MEDIUM P R T.C.T. m 8 7 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BLOCK 1 = CHIMNEY HILL PHASE 2 p Ul CAB A, SLIDE 808 dE —7PRTCT � r; 0 NOTES : 1.) NO BUFFERYARDS ARE REQUIRED ALONG S. PEYTONVILLE ROAD (70' ROW). 2 TYPE B BUFFERYARD; 10' WIDE, REQUIRED ALONG CONTINENTAL BLVD (84' ROW) 3.) ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED. s 2 v O BLOCK 9 3 BROADWALK AVE m 30 APPROX. EXISTING TREE LINE ZONED SF-20A L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL STONE LAKES, PHASE FOUR CAB A, SLIDE 2476 P R.T.C.T 0' 200' 400' 600' SCALE: 1" = 200' ZONED C-2 COMMERCIAL L.U.D = MIXED USE W & B KIDD FAMILY L.P. VOL. 11587 PG. 692 D.R.T.C.T. MYERS MEADOW PHASE ONE CAB. A, SLIDE 1329 P.R.T.C.T. �► uD JUL w 1 1297 REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR STONEBURY PLAT AND SOUTHLAKE WOODS AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS RECORDED IN VOL. 388-123, PAGE 99 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS STONEBURY" SF LOTS 1 HOA LOT 23.16 ACRES OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABS. NO. 500 SOUTHLAKE WOODS 129 SF LOTS 6 HOA LOTS 105.26 ACRES OUT OF THE W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLANNING & ENGINEEPJNG APPLICANT & OWNER TOLL BROS., INC. DOWDEY,'ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4010 EIDER DRIVE 5225 VILLAGE CREEK DRIVE, SUITE 200 McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 PLANO, TEXAS 75093 PH. (214) 562-8655 FAX (214) 542-0245 (972) 931-0694 (972) 931-9538 FAX SCALE : I" = 200' CONCEPT PLAN CASE NO. ZA 97-8� SHEET 1 OF 2 JUNE, 1997 97-005 REA . - 21 9- Q QUANITIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED N0. OF LOTS N0. OF UNITS GROSS DENSITY D.U./ACRE NO. OF ACRES ZONING ZONING L.U.D. L.U.D. W V) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AG, SF-1 A SF-20A, SF-1 A MED. & LOW DENISTY RES. MED. & LOW DENISTY RES. 40 40 31.25 I OPEN SPACE/COMMON AREA - 2 0.10 Q. COMMON AREA/AMENITY CENTER 1 0.85 PROPOSED ROW 0.47 TOTAL 43 1.22 32.65 Q EXISTING PROPOSED ZONING EXISTING L.U.D. PROPOSED L.U.D. NO. OF LOTS NO. OF UNITS GROSS DENSITY D.U./ACRE NO. OF ACRES ZONING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-1 A SF- 1 A LOW DENSITY RES LOW DENSITY RES. 11 1 1 12.89 W V) COMMON AREA/AMENITY CENTER 1 0.11 = PROPOSED ROW 1.0 a TOTAL 12 1 .1 7 14.00 N EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING L.U.D. PROPOSED L. NO. OF LOTS NO. OF UNITS GROSS DENSITY D.U./ACRE N0. OF ACRES ZONING ZONING W QSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AG SF-20A MED. DENSITY RES MED. DENSITY RES. 69 69 45.49 I OPEN SPACE/ACCESS EASEMENT AG SF-20A MIXED USE MED. DENSITY RES. 1 0.38 a UNPLATT7D LAND -0.64 REPL.ATTED N , STONEBURl' TOTAL 70 1.57 44.85 EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED N0. OF LOTS NO. OF UNITS GROSS DENSITY D.U. /ACRE NO. OF ACRES ZONING ZONING L.U.D. L.U.D. W V) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-1A SF-1A LOW DENSITY RES LOW DENSITY RES, 9 9 10.21 I OPEN SPACE/DENTENION AREA 2 1.31 PROPOSED ROW 1.59 TOTAL 11 0.68 13.11 STONEBURY W U1 SF 20 A MED DENSITY' 32 32 23.16 Q a COMMON AREA AMENITY CEN ER 1 _ .80 UNPLATTED LAND TO BE REPLATTED W/STCNEBURY .64 TOTAL 33 1.38 23.80 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 105.26 ACRES BEING a tract of land out of the W. EAVES SURVEY, Abstract No. 500 and the T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, Abstract No. 1502, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County. Texas and being part of a 43.5 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 2825. Page 524 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of a 40 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 5006, Page 843 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of a 20.77 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 4359, Page 195 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of a 13.62 acre tract of land described in deed to Bernard Cosgrove, recorded in Volume 6150, Page 878 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and part of a 13.62 acre tract of land described in deed to Pat Sheehey, recorded in Volume 6150, Page 882 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of AIRPARK ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 99 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point for the southwest corner of Tract 2 of the beforementioned AIRPARK ESTATES; THENCE with the south line of said addition, North 88'35'25" East, a distance of 696.02 feet to a point in the centerline of Peytonville Avenue; THENCE along said centerline, the following courses and distances to wit: South 00'57'28" East, a distance of 235.49 feet to a point for corner; South 01'05'09" East, a distance of 871.08 feet to a point for corner, THENCE leaving the centerline of Peytonville Avenue, and with the north line of Tract 8 of said AIRPARK ESTATES, North 89'32'51" West, a distance of 780.60 feet to a point for the northwest corner of said Tract 8: THENCE with the west line of said Tract 8 and the west line of Tract 9 of said addition, South 05'48'21" West, a distance of 529.96 feet to a point for the southwest corner of said Tract 9: THENCE with the south line of said Tract 9, the following courses and distances to wit: South 89°09'12" East, a distance of 24,18 feet to a point for corner; North 88'44'02" East, a distance of 169.95 feet to a point for corner; North 89'28'34" East, a distance of 285.30 feet to a point for corner; North 89'02'03" East, a distance of 362.99 feet to point in the centerline of Peytonville Avenue; THENCE along said centerline, South 00'54'56" East, a distance of 132.27 feet to a point for corner; THENCE continuing along the centerline of Peytonville Avenue, South 00'44'31" West, a distance of 525.19 feet to a point for the intersection of said centerline and the centerline of Continental Boulevard; THENCE along the centerline of Continental Boulevard, South 89'41'56" West, a distance of 1374.46 feet to a point for corner; THENCE leaving said centerline, and with the east line of a tract of land described in deed to H.E. Gililand, recorded in Volume 7560, Page 1015 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, North 00'14'57' East, a distance of 427.86 feet to a point for the southeast corner of NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 253 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. - THENCE with the east line of said addition and the east line of a tract of land described in deed to WE Couch, recorded in Volume 8713, Page 141 and Volume 4680, Page 389 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the following courses and distances to wit; North 00'40'58" East, a distance of 230.04 feet to a point for corner; North 00'27'05" West, a distance of 1315.27 feet to a point for the northeast corner of said Couch tract: THENCE with the north line of said Couch tract, South 89-05-15" West, a distance of 771.43 feet to a point for the southeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to Bernard Cosgrove, recorded in Volume 3865, Page 333 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE with the east line of said Cosgrove tract, part of the way. North 01'14'41" West, a distance of 477.92 feet to a point for the northeast corner of said Cosgrove tract; THENCE with the north line of said Cosgrove tract. South 89'16 56- Nest, a oistance of 79.84 feet to a point for corner: THENCE with the east line of a tract of land described in deed to Michael Cosgrove, recorded in Volume 7011, Page 700 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of the way, North 00'28'12" West, a distance of 541.14 feet to a point for the northeast corner of said Michael Cosgrove Tract: THENCE with the north line of said Michael Cosgrove part of the way. South 89'26'51" West, a distance of 332.60 feet to a point in the east right-of-way line of F.M. No. 1938 (Davis Blvd., a variable width ROW): THENCE with the said east right-of-way line, the following courses and distances to wit: North 00'50'37" west, a distance of 16.81 feet to a point for corner; North 06'33'37" West, a distance of 33.33 feet to a point in the south line of a tract of land described in deed to Otis Collin, recorded in Volume 8267, Page 1572 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE leaving the east right-of-way line of said F.M. No. 1938 and with the south and east lines of said Collins tract, the following courses to wit: North 89'27'51" East, a distance of 500.86 feet to a point for corner: North 00'22'49` West, a distance of 302 99 feet to a point in the south line of SOUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 251 of the Flat Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE with the south lines of said addition and the southerly and easterly lines of SOUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE 2, an addition to the City of Southlake. Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 2425 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas the following courses and distances to wit: North 89'27'52" East, a distance of 121.53 feet to a point for corner: North 50'55'48" East, a distance of 261.36 feet to a point for corner; North 89'38'19" East, a distance of 317.29 feet to a point for corner; North 04'08'56" West, a distance of 243.94 feet to a point for corner; THENCE leaving the east line of said SOUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE 2, North 51'27'45" East, a distance of 539.99 feet to a point for the northwest corner of STONEBURY, an addition to the City of Southlake. Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2917 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE with the west line of said addition and the west line of BAKER ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1575 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the following courses and distances to wit: South 00'12'57" East, a distance of 729.82 feet to a point for corner: South 00'09'57" East, a distance of 276.03 feet to a point for corner: South 00'13'50" East, a distance of 436.87 feet to a point for the southwest corner of said BAKER ESTATES: THENCE with the south line of said addition, South 89*51'24" East, a distance of 307.59 feet to a point for the northwest corner of said AIRPARK ESTATES: THENCE with the south line of said AIRPARK ESTATES, South 00'45'29" East, a distance of 374.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 105 26 acres of land 23.16 ACRES BEGINNING AT A P.K. NAIL IN SOUTH PEYTONVILLE AVE FOR THE NORTTIEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; SAID POINT BEING N 00'1849" W 365.85 FEET AND N 00'28'32" W 647.15 FEET AND N 89*04'05" E 33.92 FEET FROM THE NORT;IEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BAKER ESTATES AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1575 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1013.25 FEET ALONG SOUTH PEYTONVILLE AVE TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 34.95 FEET PASSING A 1/2" IRON PIN WITH CAP MARKED, 'AREA SURVEYING' FOUND IN DIE WEST LINE OF SOUTH PEYTONVIILE AVF, IN ALL A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1001.12 FEET TO A 1/20 IRON PIN FOUND IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT, - THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 29 SECONDt> WEST A DISTANCE OF 1005.83 FEET GENERALLY ALONG A FENCE TO A 1/20 IRON PIN FOUND FOR ME NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAS1 A DISTANCE Or 997.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 23.1641 ACRES OF [AND OR APPROXIMAIFL Y 1,009.033 SQUARE FEET REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR STONEBURY PLAT AND SOUTHLAKE WOODS AND TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS RECORDED IN VOL. 388-123, PAGE 99 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS STONEBURY 32 SF LOTS 1 HOA LOT 23.16 ACRES OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABS. NO. 500 SOUTHLAKE WOODS 129 SF LOTS 6 HOA LOTS 105.26 ACRES OUT OF THE W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICANT & OWNER: DO'"'DEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TOLL BROS., INC. 5225 VILLAGE CREEK DRIVE, SUITE 200 4010 EIDER DRIVE McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 I'LANfl, TEXAS 75093 PH. (214) 562-8655 FAX (214) 542-0245 (972) 931-0694 (972) 931-9538 FAX SCALE : 1" = 200' .TUNE, 1997 97-005 CASE NO. ZA 97-57 SHEET 2 OF 2 REV. , , l �)- bL ADJACENT PROPERTY STONEBRIDGE PARK SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092' EXISTING ZONINGS-P-2 0-1 L.U.D.: MIXED USE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN LOT 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10'-0", TYPE "B" m 8' MASONRY WALL SIMILAR TO PRIMARY STRUCTURE 649 - LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10'-0" TYPE "B" 25' POLE W/ 40OW SODIUM VAPOR SHOE BOX LIGHT' ADJACENT PROPERTY Ms STONEBRIDGE PARK SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 EXISTING ZONING:S-P-2 C-2 L.U.D.: MIXED USE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN LOT 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED PLUMBING TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SEVER LOCATED APPROX 480' TO SR END OF STONEBRIDGE PARK WATER TO BE CONNECTED FROM THE NE AT RANDOL MAIL RD. THE BENCHMARK USED IS:639.65 DESCRIPTION: 240'-SW OF CULVERT NORTH CURB; X CUT ON CURB � LINE REQ'D CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS NORTH 188'-4' 10'-TYPE B 4 6 19 * SOUTH 143'-8' 20'-TYPE 0 4 4 20 EAST 170'-0" 5'-TYPE A 2 3 14 WEST 194'-8" 10'-TYPE B 3 6 17 * * MUST BE SPACED 30" CENTER ALONG ALL ADJACENT PAVEN AREAS AND REACH A MATURE HEIGHT OF 3' OR MORE A MINIMUM OF 50% OF ALL CANOPY TREES PLANTED ON THE SITE MUST BE 2" IN CALIPER AND 50% MUST BE 4" IN CALIPER FOR ALL BUFFERYARDS AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. ..�.. a5a �1 . t .. ....'..'..'.:.'..,.'.'..'. ;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.•. ..:;� '. �-.•.•.. 15' RTTTT.T)'C, T.TNF, ::: 5 C 849.0 I ;•;..' :'::':':' 'aI lr/ 8 3STo� SPIT' ADOO _ ...... �TqL S gT15, r00$ '� .x O )IAXy w \ / 4 Sw �'i15 SQ. IIfv cqT.• 3z 4z3o SQ � •'. SQ P 3- • _' 8 I CRL REQ D pn yG RGSmEAgI . rA / ... a ,U,DAI ADJACENT PROPERTY ?AZrciP P ��,:AZLS 16' o ;�; ; ;•� DRAKE ESTATES LOT 4 P � � / ''..•. '• ,�/ �� w ROVZDtD T ly ; L.U.D.. MIXED USE 648 LANDSCAPE AREA % OF REQ'D AREA IN FRONT OR SIDE CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS GROUND COVER 6915 SQ. FT. APPROX. 75% 10 20 105 825 SQ. FT. �c 4u SCOCL, c I Ie �:; ;'. f7 o OWNER: JIM MARTIN OR / CO �� • • • • EXISTING ZONING: C-3 'r' PROPOSED COMMERCIAL e6i•°,l '-; :..�..: LANDSCAPE BUFFER ::..:: 5'-0" TYPE A„ •' ; _. \NT NC r, - -- - 64775 rn !� oz LOT 2, STONEBRIDGE PARK ..7; ;✓i•;EXISTING ZONING, S-P-2 C-2 ;;;.;; . - N PROPOSED ZONING: NO CHANGE —� _ PROPOSED L.U.D.. MIXED USE s ONE PROPOSED LOT LOT BEING 28,398 SQ. FT. (0.65 ACRES SITE COVERAGE: ( APPROX. 15% ) 1� 4 AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 12,640 SQ. FT. ( APPROX.45 % ) NO PROPOSED OUTSIDE STORAGE O � 0 11� NORTH ti ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT \ BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER 1997 CLOSING IN JANUARY 1998 %►'� / LANDSCAPE BUFFER C p�0 / 0 � / / O / NORTH SITE PLAN CITY xAI.I. f o e4 SITE AREA S VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE: SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 0 10' 20' 40' 60' 100' Z O Lo � I o H w� Q W � -tt i � H co 1.4 E4 W V H c co w w O • M C\2 CO C\2 Q co m 0 Cow •M W I I W C-' � E-4 o •r-i ��D�(o co ::]�DOm C\2,td4CIO V-4 ♦ ^ W OC)>-q 0 .. o o � ow • Co C co CO Lo � W � U H a I . Q, W Co W L4 W a �Lo � •�Q woco Z � t*%- Co E W W z .. cn o wC\2 � w P4 o �+ 0-4 .- 4 O E- a oV) xW Lo O � O W A E, E� �0V)0� Ei w >�� E- cr zco x 04 m E•+ z GX.. E•+ U ao q 04 Z Ei q0� aC\zE_ WEOAp� E-OE C: Q Y)av)dE 12'-0" PL 10'-0" PL Iss 2'--0" cn CQ 21'-8" ROOF PITCH IS 10/12 AUSTIN WHITE CHAULK LIMESTONE W/ WHITE MORTAR 12'-0" PL LIMESTONE } .t r , I Ja r • r 0 Lo ROOF PITCH IS 10/ 12 LIMESTONE r 34'-8" AUSTIN \' WHITE CHAULK ' LIMESTONE `►IT / WHITE MORTAR 0 0 co 14' — 0 " co �� co 2"-Dtt o ]., Ana• sr: .. •ts t. t s.f.r T � . , r a.. 3 , • , r ,n.t.r f..• f I ► st r � L, .aswR i t •7 T.r ra a, n>.r r..,>f xw, R] f a i • 1 f t r I• I.• R .. a• I IT „rs•r r.,, .• • a,T fa.asls..•r> ROOF PITCH IS 10/ 12 12'-0" PL ATION AUSTIN WHITE CHAULK LIMESTONE W/ WHITE MORTAR m CIQ FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-O" NOTES: 1 FRONT & SIDES TO BE AUSTIN WHITE CHAULK LIMESTONE W/ WHITE MORTAR 2 REAR TO BE A WHITE BRICK W/ WHITE MORTAR °,._° 3 OWNERS TO SEL'D PAINT COLORS W/ THE APPROVAL OF DEVELOPER 4) GUTTERS WHERE NEEDED. E- d A � a� p w W -a a� b o V -5, S a0 0 -tqqt ed v JCI LAP A va .5. � 0 1 WH�Qo4:44 �QP4c0Low�o- �Q�J!w^ co H co co r--4 ow CY) Y) �> co Lo E-4 Z �.,, E—+ 00 Lo �0co Z H W 1� C\2 w 0 0 SHEET NO. 7 OF 8 r- CT (T C a: En OWNER CERTIFICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT x WHEREAS, TOLL BROS., INC. acting by and through the undesigned, its duly authorized agent, are the sole owners of a tract of land out of the W. EAVES SURVEY, Abstract No. 500 and the T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, Abstract No. 1502, in the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas and being part of a 43.5 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 2825. Page 524 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of a 40 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 5006, Page 843 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. part of a 20.77 acre tract of land described in deed to Robert Goode, recorded in Volume 4359, Page 195 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, part of a 13.62 acre tract of land described in deed to Bernard Cosgrove, recorded in Volume 6150, Page 878 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and part of a 13.62 acre tract of land described in deed to Pat Sheehey, recorded in Volume 6150, Page 882 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, being part of Tracts 3 thur 7 of AIRPARK ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-123. Page 99 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found for the southwest corner of Tract 2 of AIRPARK ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 99 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE with the south line of said addition, North 88'35'25" East. a distance of 696.02 feet to a P.K. nail set in the centerline of Peytonville Avenue from which a 1/2" iron rod found bears South 88'32'25" West, 18.98 feet; THENCE along said centerline, South 00'57'28" East, a distance of 235,49 feet to a P.K. nail set for corner; THENCE leaving the centerline of Peytonville Avenue, South 89'55'25" West, a distance of 38.99 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set with a red plastic cap stamped "PBSJ, INC" (hereinafter called 5/8' iron rod set) in the west right-of-way line of said Peytonville Avenue(a variable width ROW), for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in deed to the City of Southlake, recorded in Volume 11950. Page 644 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE with said west right-of-way line, the following courses and distances to wit. South 01'00'48" East. a distance of 381.38 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner; South 01'23'55" East. a distance of 489.40 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the north line of Tract 8 of said AIRPARK ESTATES, for the southwest corner of a tract of land described in deed to the City of Southlake, recorded in Volume 11950, Page 732 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas from which a 1/2" iron rod found bears South 89 '32' 51 " East, 20.00 feet: THENCE leaving the west right-of-way line of Peytonville Avenue, and with the north line of Tract 8 of said AIRPARK ESTATES, North 89'32'51" West, a distance of 743.79 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Tract 8: THENCE with the west line of said Tract 8 and the west line of Tract 9 of said addition, South 05'48'21" West, a distance of 529.96 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Tract 9; THENCE with the south line of said Tract 9, the following courses and distances to wit: South 89'09'12" East a distance of 24.18 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner: North 88'44'02" East, a distance of 169.95 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner, North 89'28'34" East, a distance of 285.30 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner; North 89'02'03" East, a distance of 325.57 feet to 5/8 " iron rod set in the west right-of-way line of Peytonville Avenue: THENCE with said west right-of-way line, South 00'02'04" East, a distance of 634.02 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the south line of the beforementioned 43.5 acre Goode tract, THENCE with the south line of said Goode tract, South 89'41'56" West, a distance of 1342.01 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found for the southeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to H.E. Gililand, recorded in Volume 7560, Page 1015 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE leaving the south line of said Goode tract and with the east line of said Gililand tract, North 00'14'57' East, a distance of 404.86 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for the southeast corner of NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 253 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE with the east line of said addition and the east line of a tract of land described in deed to W E Couch, recorded in Volume 8713, Page 141 and Volume 4680, Page 389 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the following courses and distances to wit, North 00'40'58" East, a distance of 230 04 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner: North 00'27'05" West, a distance of 1315.27 feet to a Bois d Arc stump found for the northeast corner of said Couch tract: THENCE with the north line of said Couch tract, South 89*05'15" West, a distance of 771 43 feet to a 1" iron pipe found for the southeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to Bernard Cosgrove, recorded in Volume 3865, Page 333 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE with the east line of said Bernard Cosgrove tract, North 01'14 41 West, a distance of 477 92 feet to a 5/8- iron rod set for the northeast corner of said Bernard Cosgrove tract'. THENCE with the north line of said Bernard Cosgrove tract. South 89'16 56" west, a distance of 79.84 feet to a 5/8'" iron rod set for corner; THENCE with the east line of a tract of land described in deed to Michael Cosgrove" recorded in Volume 7011, Page 700 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas" part of the way. North 00'28'12" West, a distance of 541 14 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for the northeast corner of said Michael Cosgrove Tract: THENCE with the north line of said Michael Cosgrove part of the way, South 89'26'51' West, a distance of 332.60 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the east right-of-way line of F.M. Road No.1938 (Davis Blvd., a variable width ROW); THENCE with the said east right-of-way line, the following courses and distances to wit: North 00'50'37" West, a distance of 16.81 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner: North 06'33'37" West, a distance of 33.33 feet to a aluminum monument found in the south line of a tract of land described in deed to Otis Collin, recorded in Volume 8267, Page 1572 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE leaving the east right -of --way line of said F M. No. 1938 and with the south and east lines of said Collins tract, the following courses to wit: North 89'27'51" East, a distance of 500 86 feet to a 3/8" iron found for corner; North 00'22'49" West, a distance of 302 99 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the south line of SOUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 251 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, THENCE with the south lines of said addition and the southerly and easterly lines of SOUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE 2, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2425 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas the following courses and distances to wit: North 89'24'55" East, a distance of 121.53 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner; North 50'55 46' East, a distance of 261 36 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner, North 89'38'19" East, a distance of 317 29 feet to a 1" iron rod found for corner. North 0.1•08 56' West, a distance of 1228.17 feet to a 5/8' iron rod set for in the south right-of-way line of F.M. Road No 1709 (Southlake Boulevard, a variable width ROW) for the beginning of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 05'55'40", a radius of 2799.79 feet and a chord bearing and distance of North 58'24'22" East, 289.53 feet, THENCE northeasterly, with said south right-of-way line and with said curve, an arc distance of 289.66 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the west line of a tract of land described in deed to Bennet Liu, recorded in Volume 8661. Page 896 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE leaving the south right. -of -way line of F.M. Road No. 1709 and with said west line. South 26'51"03" East, a distance of 55.40 feet to a 1/2- iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Liu tract: THENCE with the south line of said Liu tract, the following courses and to wit: North 79'08'59" East, a distance of 104 78 feet to an axel found for corner: North 79'40'20" East, a distance of 109 84 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found in the west line r,f a !,-act of land described in deed to W 6 B Kidd Family L.P., recorded in Volume 11587, Page 692 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas, THENCE with the said west line. South 00'47'57" East, a distance of 786.97 feet to a 1/2' iron rod found for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in deed to Chateau Development Corp., recorded in Volume 11806, Page 1987 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE with the west line of said tract and the west line of BAKER ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1575 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the following courses and distances to wit. South 00'12'57" East, a distance of 729 82 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner: South 00'09'57" East, a distance of 276.03 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for corner, South 00'13'50" East, a distance of 436.87 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found for the southwest corner of said BAKER ESTATES; THENCE with the south line of said addition, South 89'51 24" East, a distance of 307.59 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for the northwest corner of said AIRPARK ESTATES: THENCE with the west like of said AIRPARK ESTATES, South 00'45'29" East, a distance of 374.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 112.9678 acres of land. NO G►�!VE�f- SUE ,ION v' ,AL! _.E Al -J� N'r - ,_-' `F)FNTIAL LOT WITHIN T DAV;_ = _ /D. (F.M. 1938) BEGINNING AT A P.K. NAIL IN SOUTH PEYTONVILLE AVE FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; SAID POINT BEING N 00'18'49' W 365.85 FEET AND N 00'28'32- W 647.15 FEET AND N 89'04'05' E 33.92 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BAKER ESTATES AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1575 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1013.25 FEET ALONG SOUTH PEYTONVILLE AVE TO A 5/8-IRON ROD FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WES f 34.95 FEET PASSING A 1/2- IRON PIN WITH CAP MARKED, 'AREA SURVEYING" FOUND IN THE WEST LINE OF SOUTH PEYTONVILLE AVE, IN ALL A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1001.12 FEET TO A 1/2' IRON PIN FOUND IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WES 1 A DISTANCE OF 1005.83 FEET GENERALLY ALONG A FENCE TO A 1/2- IRON PIN FOUND FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, - THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 997.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 23.1641 ACRES OF LAND OR APPROXIMA IFl Y 1,009.033 SQUARE FEET. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONEBURY PLAT AND SOUTHLAKE WOODS BEING A REVISION OF TRACTS 3-7, AIRPARK ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARANT CO., TX. VOL. 398-123, PG. 99, D.R.T.C.T. STONEBURY _32 SF LOTS I HOA LOT 23.16 ACRES SOUTHLAKE WOODS 129 SF LOTS 6 HOA LOTS 1 COMMERCIAL LOT 112.9 ACRES OUT OF THE W. EAVE,' SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 T.S. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICANT DOWDEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TOLL BROS., INC. 5225 VILLAGE CREEK DRIVE, StiITE 200 4010 EIn11 PLANO, TEXAS 75093 McKINNEY. '1E_X = '_ `'•) =. 41 (972) 931-0694 (972) 931-9538 FAX1214) 562-8655 F4? t�. SCALE : 1' -- 1:1� JUNE, 1997 97-005 `-r r 2 nF 2 CASE jN (). ZA 97-8 RECD J U L 211997 TEX ART STONE, INC. VOL. 8071, PG. 1 726 D.R.T.C.T. LCIT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 ZONE RE RESIDENT 1, ESTATE L U D = LOW DE SITY RESIDENTIAL PARKER'S CORNER VOL 388, PG. 150 D.R.T .T. LOT 4 ZONED 'RE' RESIDENTIAL ESTATE L U D.=MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOT 4 PARKER'S CORNER LOT 5 ZONED 'C-2' COMMERCIAL L.U.D.=MIXED USE LOT 5 PARKER'S CORNER �bAVPIS NO. 1938 B LV I) .. ,5'D WIDE TYPE 0 BUFFERYARD ALLEN SURVEY. ABS7. NO. !8 --------- V . ABS EAVES ;L1RveY. ABST. NO soo 00'50'37W 16.81, N06'33'37"W 33.33' ZONED C-2 ! ZONED AG ZONED AG LOT _ COMMERICAL 33 L U.D. MIXED AGRICULTURE -AGRICULTURE - ! IX DOF USE CAROL L.U.D. = MIXED USE I �- BLOCK I 3R, 3R2 ZONED AG w KIRKLAND ROSSETTA SHEEHEY LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 OPEN SPACE & L.U.D.= MEDIUM AGRICULTURE W.E. COUCH N VOL 12175 I rn 1 - CORNER ADDITION ZONED AG COMMON ACCE S ESMT. CAB A, SLIDE 981 PG. 752 M 11`1 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL VOL. 7766 AGRICULTURE � I oD D.R.T.C.T. o ` PG. 306 L.U.D = MIXED USE AGRICULTURE 3 1 o AUDREY BROWN BLOCK A D R.T.C.T. BERNARD COSGROVE L.U.D. = MIXED USE o `" ZONED AG VOL. 3976, PG. 12 3976 VOL. 3865 MICHAEL COSGROVE PG. 333 VOL. 7011 w AGRICULTURE D.R.T.C.T 1 D.R.T.C.T. PG. 700 0 1 j,L.U.D. = MIXED USE 1 R ` D.R.T.C.T. 0) tnl OTIS COLLINS N00°2 8'12"W. 541.14' °�°150 ! ''' VOL. 8267 PG. 1572 r` S89'16'56"W 79.84' how -lo �1s- -�S iso -1 o G.R.T.C.T. 21R ZONED C-2 BLOCK I I CD WR EAVES N 010 14' 4 I" W. 4 7 7 92' i z L.0 D.= MEDIUM ZONED AG n nl 4 NO. 500 ADDITION AGRICULTURE 2 20 — 12 e 12 e o 29I a 30 ^ - - CAB. A. SLIDE 2833 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL JERRY COUCH c 28 a 1 35' BLI 302.99' P.R.T.C.T 3 N 25 ° 26 r 27 3� ` 11s zs 145 5 N00'22'49"W w 4R aP 1R awe 0 HOLLOW ° Q �1'� 1- je r"' I �; 10 UE r- �, JOHNSON a C, ~ a J U J J = Za o aM SOUTHLAKE BLVp f J > >z m O � a - SITE CONTINENTAL BLVD. 2 e 2 ,� g 155 0 34 n N N COMMON AREA OPEN SPACE BLOC B �, \� H 0 N E Y S U 5� r I N N n _ m D 00 Z MYERS MEADOW PHASE ONE SAM CULBURTSON - 24 l,K`' 30 B L o n r- 35 o I z ZONED C-3 \ COMMERCIAL VOL. 7650, PG. 1015 I 'eo o N as 30' BL 0 60 00 6 s6SOUTDHLAKE (XED USE CROSSING BLOCK C r` 69 s 2 SH s CAB. A, SLIDE 1613 O D.R.T.C.T. ZONED I-1 W 5 N 6 "-' a I n 00 TZ �� v �a0 \ .5.�6. CAB. A, SLIDE 1614 6 r z INDUSTRIAL 4 >- s 0 s Q NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK ZONED AG 23 a U 51 157 Q :'u'N N o N ^ s 33 34 1'' AGRICULTURE P 4II 8 - W V .1 �' CAB A, SLIDE 2425 o.� 3 O m m > 30 BL s o P.R.T.C.T. CAB. A, SLIDE 253 - Z o a 6e s �' �� \ O L.U.D.= MEDIUM - - Leo - N o 3 'e0 o , D R.T.C.T. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 'n N, 4 N N 7 N I ' �j `O m z y W.E. COUCH - z w N o o U 2 s �60 Q BLOCK 3167 REVISED AREA OF PLAT 69 44.6 1 2 VOL. 8713, PG. 141 0 _ 22 = W 167 � '> 4 = -' 9 , , a '� I D.R.T.C.T. E L 0 ZONED 'AG' > I _ L ZONED R-PUD Ie3 0 Lev 168 v 3` AGRICULTURE o NOTE BERMING ALONG THIS ZONED AG 1 U n `.� o o m m O W n 1 sir ro a Z LOT 1 8 Q O L.U.D.=MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 L.U.D. = MIXED USE REENWOOD DRIVE PROPERTY LINE WITHIN AGRICULTURE 3 - "_' 8 - `_t- > PH IJ N � B y 3 ° '� ' co BLOCK 1 J � MYERS MEADO., PHASE ONE ZONED SF-20A �; M. " `� m D; �• H,E, GILLILAND LOT 2 ,n `_ - `' z�'W 3 _ N 10 m, N m 1s0 s 01 r r 135 LAB 7 CAB. A. SLIDE 1329 L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL v+1�0 a � THE 15 LANDSCAPE ESMT. L.U.D.= MEDIUM � 21 �, _ VOL. 7560, PG. 1015 BLOCK 1IDEI 16O t : ,n - Z 5C b Oo ,, P.R.T.C.T. COUNTRY WALK- x z s BERMING SHALL BE FLEXIBLE NSITY RESIDENTI q5 Y 160 3 1 e ri W CAB. A, SLIDE 2394 D.R.T.C.T. COMMON AREA N0 1 m Z W.E.wCOUCH 1 6 0 M BLOCK 5 o Z AND VARIABLE TO WORK WITH Q M ^ L 36 VOL. 4680 1 N J n (7T n i9 _ m P.R T.C. 111 EXISTING GRADE AND FIELD o 7 " h - TO BE MAINTAINED w 5 PG. 389 o O 2 9 r �` - 4 CONDITIONS D.R.T.C.T N 20 ', Z `� '� 2 n 1 6 S I 243.94' N 0 0 ' _ 228. 17 m� `- BY THE HOA � 84 08 5 ( _--- — — - — LUUAIIUN MAP jL 230 ,5 1 _ _ iJ0 �0 NU40 -- w� o,� 230.04' I -- -- -- 5' UE. 1 � ; N00' 14'57" E 427.86' N00'40'56' 3' -El I — N00 27`061W - 131 271 0 1so Cc1 1 e / S �o.c. 19 I ° N 10 SO o', 33 —105' - 135 \ - --- -- ---- -- - - - - - - - n I ^" 6 - t ,e o O BLOCK I fi r ° _ 41 - 42 BLOCK 1 15' LANDSCAPE, SCREEN LL S 30 BL I o 2 S. Qy P H S E I ANO UTILITY ESMT. 145 50' `- BL - J - 3 e `fi. Off' ZONED C-3 \ VILLAGE GREEN 2 3 1 2 1 1 4 1 5 s s 18 0 1 30 0 50 1.6 t,0 ` �_ S' 6. °, ,.� 0\' COMMERCIAL N L.U.D. MIXED USE BLK.7' 4 5 7 g ?U 11 5o INDIAN P41f 165 50' 45 140. ° L. 61. o DRIVE _ 16 JTB s 43 o, �, �J � e R U $ H - ROBERT GOODE LOT 45 35' B qs C JO 0� `9 `d 3� B 'n� z1s z �e "5 .1s WAY `'o \65 /� VOL 4359 0 30, \ I l o, a� 2 .\ 13 "-' 35 BL 3°0 o•S�9 D.R.T.C.T. �� BLOCK 1 64' e< <C DEER HOLLOW 13LvD o /\ '' 9� ° ,� 14 R I� N 16 ° m 35 B L� 44 �\ � ` � V' COMMON AREA NO 4 TO BE MAINTAINED 30 B,T el O L \r. z4o N� N 1 a 18 _ 19 _ 2Q \ LOT BLOCK 2 m_ p ^ 30' 30. Q 8 , 25' LANDSCAPE o q4 BY THE HOA M-•-I - -- ---- / ?? a w 6� a eo } ESMT. TO HOA BLOCK 6 ti , 0 COMMON AREA NO. _ 4 U GRE NLEA I / 21 c� m \��2 n� 9 12 z1s ('� 1 8. UT m z a�2 :.\t1 7 s` m 5 �`' 2 'b v� 4 -$ ' 1 Iso J 1zq - izo _ •o `'� 9R 20 -�-- — m a S �; , e S 0 0 47 57 B 6.9 PARK AP OX. LIMITS 1 5 J .-. \ 5 ° `� ° ��o, % `-� `.J�' J `l w i-' O ' ' -� `` VOLTM1 10696� PG �1909 ^ �� 1 7 J O E-" b E °\h o "" :(�' i J �_ i e p_ 1 0-TEAR FLOppP N /. 3 to . a 13 R I2 R- I 1 R e 1013 ' s ' z�s tJ `" ram, �0 C/] -. c y h ; T 1 �- "�"'. T o - \ o O ♦ DENOTES STREET DR.T.C.T. W ,� _ �• < J �� s N -,S63E28'3�' 171.3814 - BLOCK 2 35'B —, "' �`D NAME CHANGE LOT o BL CK 2 19 �Q \ a `_ 0�' ? LOT I zs 12 2. 1 � �r. 8 R 0 In �- BLOCK 2, - ', - - \ O�" 1_ - . w �� I I �' BRANDON KER I 1 ` 0 Io �'� ° ST�NEBURY cRl� �. ,6� REVISED AREA OF PLAT 7 LOTS 4.3 1 E 1•� ! COMMON A NO 2 ( '` S -- _ 78� 4 'S9"W ,, o o 25' LANDSCAPE 4 VOL. 11492, PG? 2326 A=4 50 30 z �0 Vtl4AINTAIN i urr. 14, P.9 ESMT. TO HOA I} O D.R.T.C.T.-') 5 ZONED C-2 0 BY THE HOA NLn 529,E ;��'�{� ,g U ) 4,j v R=1 5.00 S23034'05"E 210.13' _ COMMERCIAL Ilel 0=37 55'26" L.U.D. = MIXED USE \ J I APPROX. LIMITS Cifi THE ` m - - - _ LOCK _6 - _I I v% T= 46. 54 ' 1 5 7 0 DRAINAGE i f, 1 4 m 0 100-Y R FLOODPLAIN r s 8° 5' 25"W 153 2 2 0 j• L= 89.1 P g 1 1 I 2, �1/ ° I R= W& B KIDO FAMILY L.P. 1 1 ° �1 1 , NI 3 1 \ N 7 5. 00' $ ESMT. } \ �_ ZONED SF- t S 83 59' 14 W 50-00 j VOL. 11587 Z0N1 G 1 r, ' J r �27.00' S00'45'2y" 374.47' L.U.D MEDIU I N w BOCK 1 - T=25.74' PG. 692 71 �( DR INAGE SMT. E-TENTI N DENSITY RESIDE IAL S89°31' 28"W 16 4'$5� L=49 64' . TO E MAIN AI �'- (- �POIN OF B IN Y o _ o D.R.T.C.T. �- TRACT � `"�.. TRACT 8 w 6 , 6: 14 50' 07 a Q , Y T ,* ; o. 4 11 BAKER ESTATE V p o } MIKEL FAULKNER - BOBBY HARRELL - t O N00 28'32'W.40.52' I R=225.00' - _ 3Q _� TRACT 2 TRACT , CAB- A, SLIDE t 75 P VOL. 10336 ,' VOL. 10462 m , 16 5 rn ) MICP _L P.R.T.C.T. 1 r 4 T=29-29' ��O I PG. 1646 PG 0016 I: Btt i CHARLES 1 Qp 3 r i LEASE FOSTER o 2 ZONED SF-20A L= 58.26 I 7 - D.R T.C.T. D,R j.C.T. 35 34 - 31 ) p=�I4 50 07 F _ VOL. 9939 VOL, 7312 L.U.D MEDI .q� NSITY RESIDENTIAL o n y N89 31'28 E 34.66 P HASE ,• R=)175. 00 - aJ ,-. q� W I o�Qo L � �'' E I STATES r�. 1022 Pc. 1386 .) _ I w m I 1 stor�EBuRY 1 c° ° , i •-a ' �,+ PPROX. •IMITS OF HE F 1�Pv'?,QI�J,NG \' oDD>R,T C T T_'22.78' 8 w S 32 34'53' E 7. 19' ,• D.R.T.C.T. 1 �45.3 ' z CAB. A, SUDS 2917 Z 5 S23°53'18"W 25.51' ~ III `1 100-YEA FLOOOP IN 3 I CARROLL I.S.D. �..� Ao "' x J 40' BL �r� i t k N I `��� _ �,ir��. p %� (�T P.R `� T. N S 03°53' " 35"W. 12-62' ZONED 'CS' C� m �` _ 1 L.U.D. = PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC �J 8 m Z r _ ZONED SF 1A . ;`, - _ l �• I-}.�`� ' Y VOL. 8303, PG. 689 '`-' 15' lA� CkL�E 1 2 m ` J O_ 6 , V i 1 r L.U.D. = LOW D.R.T.C.T. O LL _ l ' I 17 ESMT. HOA W DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 AIRPARK ESTATES LONGHORN HOhLfI p 2 ,t.0 D SFLOW I ZONED RE 3 I 4 m ' p 17 °3 2' 26 " W ` �_;., VOL, 388-123, PG 99 :_ I� DENSITY ESIDENTIAL ENTIAL 5T/�ig LOT 1 ' o ' ' P.R.T C ���� 40' BL._ ~' E h I AIRPARKESTATES ° BLOCK 2 / `^�' - �; r �' VOL. 388- 23, PG. 99 ,• r.L.U.D = LOW ENSl7Y Cu • T_ 125.00' �� LaF 36 �- 1, v' P R C T - 19.28' r BLOCK 2 O J - HIRANDON BAKER x" ; HAS E ti ' oe L= 38. 2?' REVISED 20'0" WIDE TYPE B � '- 1 LANDSCAP+D g COMMON AREA No ! 37 39 40 �j-.1'}p �T CPC. t2300 8 cc �� 3 S 00 28' 3 21 E Rp�y 25' LAf__�CAP TO BE MAINTAINED - - %1,0C*- I� I'' 19 PRELIMINARY" PLAT BUFF RO/ / ESMT. TO( j61A BY THE HOA CO W DEDICATI I20 CO> 1 2 1 COMMON AREA NO. 3 1 1040' BL �' 1 I `` 1 013.2 5 25' LANOSCAP I ESMT TO HOA ( ` '� C Z o --- -- ter- -------- - -- r� - -v ------N�j' ---;-- ------------ -t `+...J J `_.' z I- - - J VE. --- O `�1-- - _ FOR THOW-.ON 5"'(. A{ ABST. NO. ? 2 I vL. , r. 1 ` W EAVES (SURVEY ABST NO S 99 29 40 W t Io o1.iC- STONEBLTRY PLAT AND 3 1 - BLOCK 1 SCENIC DRIVE _ J I ZONED SF-20A I CONTINENTAL PARK ESTATES VOL. 388-98, PG. 23 i 2 P.R.T.C.T, 13 14 AKHURST DRIVE 1 �l 44'31"W 525.19' S00'54'56 E ?KM?NN, 1 SUI2 Pe1,�. Stis J r` 501'OS'09" E 87 t OS' -- �6ZY5T�8-E -- - - - - � -- -- I _ - -- - .. R. PAOEN SURVEI', ABST. - 5 NO. t 25Z _ `` *� T + �j 1 HL�`�11L WOODS � 9 1p 1 22 '7ONED RE PEYTONVILLE AVENUE j t BLOCK t JOU f-,(-' RESIDENTIAL ESTATE L. Lf 0.,= ZONED SF-20A L.U.D. MEDIUM w , > 2 3 4 (l,OUNTY ROAD 3088) , u a 6 ZONED SF-2 33 � AND TRACTS 3-7 AIRPARK ESTATES i MED. DENSITY RE�DENTIAL BILLY CUR DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CHIMNEY HILL PHASE 1 o 1n BLOCK 4 ZONED SF-20A ZONED SF-1A ZONED SF-lA U D. = LOW D0SITY RESIDENT LI 1 r a L.U.D. MEDIUM 2 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 5 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE �1 L. 6495, R6 525 D.R.T.G.T. CAB. A, SLIDE 35 P.R.T C T CY o SHADOWOOD 5 L.U.D. MEDIUM L U 0. - LOW DENSITY RESIDEN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL JOSE FRANCO AL 4 STONE LAKES PHASE FOU CAB. A, SLID£ 2a'6 ! o PARK PLACE ADDITION '�' 5 Z ZONED SP-1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS �-.. ZONED SF-20A GINGER'S KNOLL PG VOL. 609 P.RTC.T i w- � m CAB A suoE 2575 P.R.T.C-T- � CAB A. SURE 1460 P.R.T.C.T. AS RECORDED IN VOL. 388--123, PAGE 99 N L.U.D. MEDIUM 8 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL w 7 VOL. 388-tOt, PG. 68 p R T�C T. P.R.T.C.T. J m 3 Y 4 a a OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF T ARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BLOCK 1 :HIMINEY HILL PHASE 2 0 3, CAB. A. SLIDE 808 2 o STONEBURY BROADWALK AVE 7P R.T GT. 6 0 BLOCK 9 3 ? SF LOTS I HOA LOT m 30 f ZONED SF-20A L.U.D MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Quantitative Land Use Schedule: STo: •E LAKES, PHASE FOUR � AB A, SLIDE 2476 P.R.T.C.T. Existing Prop Existing Prop. # of # of Gross Density NOTES Land Use Land Use Zoring Zoning Lots Units A0. DU/Ac. 1.) NO BUFFERY4RDS ARE REQUIRED ALONG S. PEYTONVILLE ROAD (70' R0vo. TYPE B BUFFERYARD; 10' WIDE, REQUIRED ALONG CONTINENTAL BLVD (84 ROW) STONEBURY SF SF SF 20A SF 20A 32 32 23.16 1.38 SF 3 ) ALL t.ST1NG S T RUC"ORES 7. 0 BE REMCVED E Anticipated completion date: 7i98 1 HOA SOUTHLAKE WOODS SF SF SF 20A SF 20A 136 129 112.96 1,14 SF-1A Anticipated completion date: 7/99 APPROX. EXISTING TREE LINE 11� OY 200'll .// ;/ I/ 23.16 ACRES OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABS. NO. D00 SOUTHLAKE WOODS 12-9-SF LOTS 6 HOA LOTS I COMMERCIAL LOT 112.9 ACRES OUT OF THE W. EAVES SURVEY, ABST. NO. 500 T.S. rHOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. NO. 1502 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, T ARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICANT & OWNER TOLL BROS., INC. DOWDEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4010 EIDER DRIVE 5225 VILL AGE CREEK DRIVE, SUITE 200 McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 PLANO, TEXAS 75093 PH. (214) 562-8655 FAX (?14) 542-0k45 (972) 931-0694 (972) 931-9538 FAX SCALE : 1" = 200' CASE NO. ZA 9 ;D JUL 21 199�HEET 1 OF 2 RL% �- JUNE, 1997 97-00 WNERS CERTIFICATE AND DEDICATION CURVE r- RADIUS I - LENGTH TANGENT CHORD -T--BEARING DELTA Cvt 75.00 49.64 25.77 S8523 52 W 37'55 26 Cv2 - -_-_225.0U 58.26' _ 29 29 _48.74 58.10' S83 3'029 E - 14S0 07 Cv3 125.00' _ 38.29' 19.30' 38.14 S08'17- 5�`W 17-33 02� Cv4 175.00 17.0 8.50 16.99T NO3'15 28 W 05'33 52 Cv5 _ 175.00' _ 45.31' 22.78' __ 45.19' _ N06'56'32 E 14'S0 07 _ Cv6 125.00' 69-A 46.54 87.23' S06'03 40 E _40'50 30 Cv7 100.00 _ 5.64T"_- 2.82T -- 5.64' T7T"- S64'49 06 W _ 1T-i- 03'14 00 _ Cv8 200.00' 72.46' 36.63' _ _ 72.07' N16'25'09'W 20-45'31" LINE DIRECTION =_DISTANCE T1 8N 9 13 28 E 34.66 _ T2 S32'34 53"E 7.19 T3 S23 53 18'W 25.51' T4 S03'53 35'W 12.4 9 T5 N00' 8232"W _ 40.52 _ T6 S83'57 W 50.00 T7 S63'12 06 W T8 N26'47 54"W 40.25' SOUTHLAKE CROSSING CAB. A , SLIDE 1613 CAB. A SLIDE 1614 CAB. A SLIDE 2425 P R T C. T. LOT j BLOCK AREA r 3R r 2 i 21 21 9X 2 34,910 10R 2 28,742 11 R 2 I 20.040 12R 2 I 20,016 13R 2 21.831 ! 13R 1 ! 22.001 NOTE J COMMON AREAS ARE PRIVATE AND WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THE OWNERS OF ALL CORNER LOTS SHALL MAINTAIN SIGHT I�r IANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ;` NO PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO S. PEYTONVILLE AVENUE WILL BE PERMITTEC, NOTE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES t3) TC BE REMOVED. SOUTHLAKE I BLVD a SITE W LOCATION J J c000e Z AIRPM T O a. to i CONTiNENTA VICINITY W. B. KIDD FAMILY LTD. PTNRSHP VOL_ 11587 , PG. 692 ROBERT G. GOODE I D. R T C.T. I VOL. 8 21 2, PG. 1 3 10 D.R.T.C.T. MAP STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, TOLL BROS.. INC., acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent. are the sole owners of a tract of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey. Abstract No. 500 in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and also being part of a tract of land as recorded in Volume 11806, Page 1987 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: r'OMMENCING at a P.K. nail found in South Peytonville Avenue (a variable width right--if-way), said commencing point being N. 00118'49" W., 365.85 feet; N. 00°28'32" W., 647.15 feet and N. 89°04'05" E., )3.92 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1 of Baker Estates, as recorded in Plat Cabinet "A". Slide 1575 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas; Thence S. 89°04'05" W.. 346.27 feet leaving said South Peytonville Avenue to the POINT OF BEGINNING. a'.!" iron rod set for corner; ACKARD ADDITION VOL. 388-42 PG. 100 P R. T. C. T. POINT OF BEGINNING N89'04'05"E 151.65' S.89°04'05"W 846.27' _--- LOT--- - - - 9 X BLOCK 2 _ _ -- - -- - -- -- - --i----- - �lt, - - 132.28'- - 1. 2"1 R 5.- -- -� - U. E- - - -- - - COMMON AREA NO.3� �O �' / r k' A / t937' �'� BLOC K i 2 "AMENITY CENTER" \2 �O 3� H �,, I LP. 7 E I 5 4 8R ST NE BURY ADDITION 0 �1R.S '.R.S. f NDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY l / �•�o C�� _r Cv1 r �/ Cv2 T1 h 53.88' - -- - ° \ q I'! \6�J 35' B L---- ^`'T4 1/ 1. R. N 63 (2 06 E 6E ' 9. 5 7 ' N6 / coo ", CP s_ c, LO 13 R U I/2 "1.R S. 3 ,� q 3 �. r✓ ,Sg. - •�-cP N. t~ M I N. F F 654.79 F--- / ----- ---- � N 26°47' S4" I IO'` E 0 1 ,� rJ / 0 T6 S89 31 28 W- 64:0 - -- - It - Z m ' 50. 0� 3� I/2"I.R.S. �10' U.E. ab Q 1/2 ��n I R s Cv4 I 1 p Z I. R. S cv j N 12 I N N 4 Z ;� f O R W w o 1- (L Z 42 c1I 11 rn _------ ---- ~ w I �p I S89'31'28"W �- - _Q 167 00 j __ Z (STONEBURY CT. __-- TO BE ABANDONED t1 J 50' -------------- BY THIS PLAT 00 W 0 R.O.W. I I \ ----- - -- o' I I R m ow Qo 3 cv Cr rn I 2 _J ao I r S89'31'28"W c� -- ---- - -- - 6 - i - cv 16 7. 00' 00 O M OI1� W O ZS� I2R I^o W to - - Y � 01 � I /2"Z - - c N 1 °' cv I.R. Z 1 N 10 ' U.E. L O 1-2- W_ S89_31'28"Wr^J Z1/2"1.R.S. J- - (n 4 0 Y r1.1-' -164.52'- - - U m I Z I(� I- I(,.''_1E � I/2"LR.S. 8 7 121-- I LLJ = 18 W' '� �'4 9 1 D 13R ` 1/2" Q cn c 1 N o o 0 pp 4) N i Q LL 1 7 W 112"I.R.S. S / STONEBURY AD,,DITION14 �\ w J/� 15 5 1 7 38 I = o/ c° I� 16 �/7 BLOCK 2 I� / O J f BAKER ESTATES ROBERT G. GOODEI t5 CAB. A , SLIDE 1575 VOL. 8212 PG. �1 3 10� P R.T C. T. D.R.TC.T. I I 1 NOTE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE PLP,T IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS, OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN, MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA. J' NOT E SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS. CrI W J J z 0 STONEBURY w DRIVE 0- Z f- 0 /POINT OF COMMENCING K NAIL FIND. PUBLIC EASEMENT ABANDONNIENT BY PLAT We. the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat. said easement being previously recorded in Cabinet Slide _ of tile Records of County. Texas. Texas Utilities Electric Sismed: Printed Name: Title. - Date: GTE Central. Inc. �ned: _ --- Prtnteci \am,: Fide: - -- Dale: --- Harron Cables ision of Texas Signed: --------------- Printed Namc. - - -- -Title:---- --- - Date: _ Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. S 1 fined: Printed Name: Title: Date: Lone Star Gas Compan% S W, lie : --- --------- - - Printed Natne- Fide _ --- - .- ---- Sammons Communications. Inc. Printed N.u11e - - -- - - 1 i t 1 e --- --- - - --- - --- Date: kPPROVED BN THE PLANNING & ZONING CO MISS10` Date: Chsirman: P&Z Secretary: .APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Date: l Mayor: t:1ty Secretarv: RECORD OWNER TOLL BROS , INC. 4010 EIDER DRIVE McKINNEY TEXAS 75070 PH. (214) 562-8655 FAX (214) 542-0245 PLANNING a ENGINEERING DOWDEY , ANDERSON a ASSOCIATES, INC. 5225 VILLAGE CREEK DRIVE SUITE 200 PH. (972) 931-0694 PLANO , TEXAS 75093 FAX (972) 931-9538 THENCE S. 23°34'05" E.. 210.13 feet to a'iz" iron rod set for comer, said point being in anon -tangent curve to the right running in an easterly direction and having a central angle of 37155'26" a radius of 75.00 feet and a chord bearing of N. 85'23'52" W..- THENCE along said curve 49.64 feet to the end of said curve, a iron rod set for corner. said point being the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 14°50'07" a radius of 225.00 feet and a chord bearing of S. 83°03'29" E.; THENCE along said curve 58.26 feet to the end of said curve. a �" iron rod set for corner-. THENCE N. 89°31 *28'" E.. 34.66 feet to a ',-." iron rod set for corner: THENCE S. 32034'53" E.. 7. ! 9 Peet to a iron rod set for corner: THENCE S. 23°53' 18" W.. 25.51 feet to a _ iron rod set for corner: THENCE S. 03°53'35" W'., 12.49 feet to a iron rod set fur corner. said point beins, in anon -tangent curve to the left running in a southerly direction and laming a central Angie of 17°33'02" a radius of 125.00 feet and a chord bearing of S. 08' 1 "' 59" W'., THENCE along said curve 38.29 feet to the end of said curve, a iron rod set for comer; THENCE S. 00°28'3_" W.. 40.52 feet to a ':!" iron rod set for corner: THENCE S. 89031 '28" W.. 164.06 feet to the ' iron rod set for corner. THENCE S. 8305716" W.. 50.00 feet to a ' iron rod set ti3r corner, said point being in a non -tangent .:urge to :he right running in a southerly direction and ha�ing a central angle of 0S°33'52" a radius of 175.00 feet and a chord bearing of S. 03''15'23" W.: THENCE along said curve 17.00 feet to the end of said curve, a ;;" iron rod set for corner; THENCE S. 00028'32" E. 325.93 feet to a %" iron rod set for comer, said point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 14°50'07" a radius of 175.00 feet and a chord bearing of S. 0656'32- E.. , THENCE along said curve 45.31 feet to the end of said curve. a V.," iron rod set for corner, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 40'50'30" a radius of 125.00 feet and a chord bearing cif S. 06'03'40" E..- THENCE along said curve 87.23 feet to the end of said curve. I : iron rod set for corner: FHENCE S. 63028'34" W.. 171.32 feet to a `,!" iron rod set for corner; THENCE N. 0503217 W'.. 178.22 feet to a 1." iron rod set for corner, THENCE N. 00028'32" W., 376.23 feet to a ''/z" iron rod set for corner: THENCE N. 26047'54" W.. 50.00 feet to a Vz" iron rod set for corner; THENCE N. 63012'06" E.. 9.57 feet to a'/--" iron rod set for corner; THENCE N. 26047'54" W., 194.95 feet to a'/" iron rod set for corner: YHENCE N. 51022'40" E., 150.77 teet to a iron rod :;et for corner; ('HENCE N. 89004'05" E.. 151.65 teet to the Point of Beginning and containing 4.312 acres (187,809 square tee0 of land. NOW. THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, TOLL BROS., INC., acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, does hereby adopt this plat designating the here-nabove described real property as Lot 13R, Block i & Lots 8R thru 13R, Block 2 of STONEBURY, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate to the public's use the rights -of -way and easements shown thereon. This plat does not alter or remove existing, deed restrictions or covenants, if any, on this property. WITNESS my hand at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the day' of 1997 Toll Bros., Inc Elvio P. Bruni, Sr. Project Manager STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Elvio P. Bruni. Sr. Project Manager, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 1997 Notary Public, in and for the State of Texas PRINT NAME Commission Expires SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS is to certify that I, V.L. Matocha. a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from a actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents the survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. V.L. Matocha Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1816 PLAT REVISION LOT 13R, BLOCK 1 81 LOTS 8R thru 13R, BLOCK 2 STIONEBURY AN ADDITION TO THE CiTY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOTS 8 thru 13, BLOCK 2 AND LOT 13, BLOCK I OF STONEBURY AS RECORDED IN CABINET A , SLIDE 2 91 7 , P R.T C.T. AND 0 64 ACRES OUT OF THE W R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.500 6 RESIDENTIAL LOTS / I COMMON GREEN 4.312 ACRES DULY 1997 E UL211997 THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET SLIDE DATE CITY CASE NO. - ZA 97 - 088 cm O a 0 } E / L L L O E } / 0 w m N t M M M t ti o� M � N I. II z z 0 0 M X Q X J J Q 0 O � ° z c U J a/ �a w 00 ti � M t M N d Q'md / / a c z a J O O J m L U ~ O a 3 Z E / O } H o of Q 0 0 ti � m � CL M m LL W J ( lr d cr/ ako � J m M 0 0 M 0 0 N O N Q, I I � � N - II .I z z a O O - �I 0 V) y w� U > d O }uj - - a N 3 c / 1 om a/ a N / U � 3 c/ c L ate/ E L O v U u M O ' E E ti cc c c c L L L ` L L L N O E O \ E E E r- 7: 7:+`-0 0 0 0 II .I tl W li Z 0 W W U J rr=0a l� I I , It I C u 4 .- r % i " F 2 0 \ i I TA 4 {.... / I 4 <f CAIROL�L� � / ROAD % d BAPTIST CHURCH LU E 517 592.4 + I , -- _ - ZONED. CS LUD: PUBLIC /SEMI PU8LI a WI IAM BRET V yy 1 /l 111 0 LUD: lu `°Y. `fIMARRON "ADDITIONI o.. 47'14`E 1 l _ FLOOD-- - WYNDSOR CREEK 0 243.51' I r r' _C�4IISL Lal CAB. A. SLIDE 707 - - - �Q- - - - j- - 1 - o� i ZONED: PUD 480-OIC r - -- - LINE 1 . MEDIUM DENSITY RESEDENTTIAL _ 37 It O Q5� 03,W`` 1 S89'`.40'46'E (� I coN \ :III III I 5�0' 137.96' S ` °' \`' 36 --I •Cko QMMO EEN 0' n ♦ II'`1 n Y:. j' z- ♦1e II , - _ 17 86v�F' DRIvE 8 ©'4 ELONGFOR49 30E,5 Av 209 . 0� Q - - 1 1 / B~i • p u+ 153' 5' BL L m L w 'pLIDh3 r� _ ( }�... �5' U.E. 1 _ p 4 , 2 1 Q S89 40 46 j ` TIMARRON 9- ADDITION 0 7' 90'- Sa' 27 1 3.32 l+ WYNDSOR CREEK �� 1' j 1 1 i20 1 I I54' �.� 34- �^ -- CAB. A, SLIDE 1707 // VOL 955. ' BLOCK 6 183' 1 ' j` PG. 3 1` `A ,, .Q� 9O' 93' P R T C T I I \ TREES ( /s •,`�/ / ZONED: PUD 480-01C 9j.4 I 1 I \ BLOCK 16 E LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY R SEDENTI L . l Ln I 1 pt 3 _ 32 \33 r\, \ i�ti0 �° R \ ao •.. - `� O C MMON 76' /T o� 1 EE / ti i 0 T 2 W W 92' 87' 35'BL 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FE r'=100' CENTERLINE I 94 6 F D C C T Q / �Oi - ,� c T C7 14892' 9a r ~ - "` f � �25'B� i , ;I 1 X� 1 �I 0 25BL ti :4 IlI! z; fHi I •`, 46� r' S1 49 48 - 4- yi+. Z�.+.. 442E 45 _, .I ..... I - ON GR EN LOT 2 5' 2 BLOCK :.:(13s' LOC 16- 1824 SF u AB E WIDTH ROW 01 �" VARf ' 49' 10' .E. '90' 10' U.E. 95' 86' �9rl 86 90, 87' ti DE I ATION cam, ry . CARROLL ROAD H R BAPTIST CHURCH CH VILUME 12409, PAGE 830 / p ZONED: CS \! tUl): PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC O�&�"SP�SE, VALORIE BOREN 62323 E 1999 ZONE m I RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING A 15.925 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CALLED 124.3945 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND THAT CALLED 1.9976 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC.) RECORDED IN VOLUME 9813, PAGE 2375 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CALLED 2.810 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION RECORDED IN VOLUME 9899, PAGE 1125, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 8.417 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FOR THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AND SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE; THENCE ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD, THE FOLLOWING TWO CALLS: N 89'28'21' W, A DISTANCE OF 478.38 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 89'32'03' W, A DISTANCE OF 181.85 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 00'16'51- E, DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD ; , THENCE N 89'29'12' W, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 487.24 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCEOVERAND ACROSSSAID 124.945 TRACTAND SAID I.9967 ACRE TRA CT THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN CALLS: N 06-05'03' W, A DISTANCE OF 573.01 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89'40'46' E, A DISTANCE OF 270.53 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 06'05'03' W, A DISTANCE OF 5.03 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89'40'46' E, A DISTANCE OF 137.96 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 00'19'14' W. A DISTANCE OF 125.89 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89'40'46' E, A DISTANCE OF 273.32 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 37'37'34' E, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 00-19'14' E. A DISTANCE OF 209.11 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89-47'14- E, A DISTANCE OF 243.51FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 00'08'09' W, A DISTANCE OF 209.26 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89'49'30' E. A DISTANCE OF 209.47 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN SAID APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING TWO CALLS: S 00-16'53' W, A DISTANCE OF 159.68 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 00-14'03' E, A DISTANCE OF 417.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 15.925 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. HENRY H DICKERSON v' VOLUME 12337, PAGE 1817 1• DRTCT ZONED: PUD NO 8 480-143 LUD: MIXED USE 29' ROW DEDICATION 64' ROW 1 1� ,25'EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT i OMMON GREEN LOT 43 1100 SF ■ cn i A N GENTERKLINE EXISY TING KUAUW - f �- Y q �. - - A ARIA -WIIDI ENT RAW ------- -- -:-- I 8.85' 418.3 _ _ nlcArl A ENT NTE .�4' L N .. I I _ _ _ 2N 0 1 51 E IF- 0' ROADW - 58 EASEMENT' �_ _� ASEM ' p 25. ' �o+ o' ROADWAY T/ N - y - •� , APPROXIMATE LOCA li I EASEMENT EXISTING DRIVEWAYS/ ` all 'u r EAST HA\VEN A DITION / /BILLY" J� N �(� am V LUM 388-154 PAGE 64 %ZONEf FI ~ \ �a �I� \ II li . I ONED M ,t'II I DIUM 9EN Y SIP L wlw � 603..: . '�,: ' IY 1- -� Z > �► •-r 4 RFCIf1FNTIA _ _.. lf 5 ; , � I I I. iC �- J0E WRIGHT VO E 8030, PAGE 2181 DRTCT ZONED: SFt-20B ':. 6048 + (I D: MIXEDI USE i_ POINT OF BEGINNING AP ROVEQ� RELI ' PLAT I--TIMA R % DDITIOM I AG I - - ' .3 + I I �1 • � � n � I 1 I �/ �PP� TIMARRO DDI I N .7 -' �' ����♦. G'L E DO V E R I + r; CAB. A SLIDE 17 9 ' P T C T ZONED: P D 48 - I �'► ;' '� � ,; •r � �" e • t B ' CREEK -COMMU TIES / LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY E EDE , I 1 � I!! T a� � I! i' f' r�ONED: PUD 480-OIC I �' LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NOTES: I, EXISTING ZONING: RESIDENTIAL PUD 480-OIC EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2. ALL BUILDING SETBACK LINES SHALL BE PER THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ATTACHED TO THIS SUBMITTAL. 3. SCREENING FENCES AND WALLS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES OR VISIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC INTERSECTIONS, 4. COMMON GREENS ARE PRIVATE OPEN SPACES DEDICATED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 5. ALL LOTS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS PLAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WHICH ACCOMPANY THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 6. THE MAXIMUM GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN WYNDSOR CREEK II INCLUDING COMMON AREAS IS 1.61 DU/AC. 7. THERE ARE NO EXISTING STRUCTURES STREET ' - r � 0"I t 1 �r �171� �. LOCATION MAP N.T.S. LEGEND CIRF CIRS UE DE _ BL _ OUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD SET STREET CHANGE UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT BUILDING LINE 6' WOOD SCREEN FENCE PARCEL ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE ZONING LAND USE NO. LOTSS ACREAGE DU/AC GREENS COMMON COMMON GREEN ACREAGE % OF OPEN SPACE PHASE I, SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 66 32.81 2.01 2 2.78 8.5 PHASE I, SECTION 2 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 95 69.67 1.36 4 13.35 19.2 PHASE 2, SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 32 16.81 1.90 1 0.78 4.6 PHASE 2, SECTION 2 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 55 41.85 1.31 3 7.18 17.2 BRENWYCK N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 56 27.63 2.03 2 5.24 19.0 WYNDSOR CREEK I N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 40.74 2.06 3 5.02 12.3 GLENDOVER N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 53 38.86 1.36 3 7.23 18.6 ESTATES N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 30 22.78 1.32 3 4.72 20.7 VILLAGE A. PHASE 3 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 5 5.7 0.88 0 0 0 CRESCENT ROYALE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 155 48.21 3.22 13 7,15 14.8 STRATHMORE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 109 61.50 1.77 3 2.53 4.1 WYNDSOR GROVE N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL III 51.86 2.14 4 6.71 12.9 BRENWYCK II N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 112 44.78 2.50 6 1.33 3.0 VILLAGE 'H' SUMMER 1999 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 225 91.17 2.47 5 3.99 4,4 VILLAGE '1' SUMMER 1997 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 145 61.01 2.37 5 5.09 0.8 VILLAGE 'J' SPRING 1998 PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 56.81 1.48 7 5.4 10.0 WYNDSOR CREEK II SPRING 1998 PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 26 15.93 1.63 4 2.6 16.3 SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1443 728,12 1.98 68 81.11 11.1 F R --- --- --- --- CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USE) --- 12.61 --- --- --- --- SUBTOTAL GOLF COURSE --- 161.34 --- --- 148.73 --- PHASE 5 C-2 USES PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 10.69 --- --- --- --- PHASE I C-2 USE PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 6.04 --- --- --- --- SCHOOL SITE PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 1 17.42 --- --- --- --- GRAND TOTAL 1448 923.61 1.37 68 229.34 24.9 *VILLAGE 'I' INCLUDES BYRON NELSON PARKWAY ___ mmm ___ RF�'D JUL 2 8 1997 PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMARRON ADDITION WYNDSOR CREEK PHASE II OUT OF THE OBEDIAH W KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 15.925 ACRES/ 26 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 4 COMMON GREEN LOTS OWNER/DEVELOPER: WESTERRA -TIMARRON L.P. 7905 W. VIRGINIA PARKWAY McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 (972) 529-5988 FAX (972) 529-5540 ENGINEER: CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 DALLAS,TEXAS 75247 (214) 638-0145 FAX (214) 638-0447 JULY, 1997 rncF Nn 7A U7-nFS r9-p 1()R Alrl 07'>1Z0r11