Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1997-06-17 CC Packet city managerreport
s re ort
ig SPIN 2►
601,141 June 13, 1997
1997 Business Needs City Council Action t
Survey Highlights June 17, 1997
The following items will be addressed at the • '
The needs survey was designed regular City Council meeting on June 17,
to obtain information, opinions 1997.
and concerns from a broad Consent Agenda:
spectrum of businesses in 1) Request to advertise for bids for a 5 million gallon tank located 2,700' north of
Southlake. A total of 225 Kirkwood Boulevard on the east side of T.W.King Road.
usable survey instruments were 2) Authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction
returned from the 608 for the installation of a 20" water main on East Southlake Boulevard.
3) Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for professional
businesses for a 37% response services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II.
rate. 4) Addendum to Cheatham&Associates' contract for professional services to include
Phase II design of Bob Jones Park to include parking lots, drives, irrigation,
Survey results indicate that landscaping, and other park improvements.
Southlake is a good place to do 5) Requests to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park, Phase I.
6) Excuse the absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two consecutive
business. Overall, 93.5 Council meetings.
percent of respondents
icated they are pleased with Regular Agenda:: Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, related items:
....it existing Southlake 1) Ord. No. 480-245 Rezoning, S-P-2, Miron Addition (#8)
operation. In comparison to 2) Ord. No. 480-Y Establishing regulations for personal care facilities
3) Ord. No. 483-G Subdivision Ordinance
respondents of the 1995 4) Ord No. 483-F Amending Ord. No. 483, revising Article VII, Park and
survey, a lesser percentage Recreation Dedication Requirements
anticipate moving their 5) Ord. No. 480-222 Rezoning/Concept Plan for Timarron Commercial Tract III
business out of Southlake or (#4, #5, #6)
downsizing, and a greater 6) ZA 97-056 Development Plan of Timarron Village J (#9)
7) ZA 97-057 Preliminary Plat of Timarron Village J (#9)
percentage plan to expand. 8) ZA 97-063 Plat Revision for Timarron Addition Bryson Square Phase I located
Approximately one-third of on the south side of the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon Trail (#13)
Southlake businesses are home- 9) ZA 97-053 Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network, (#11)
based. 10) ZA 97-054 Site Plan for Georgetown Park Phase II (#7)
11) ZA 97-058 Site Plan of Southlake Oaks Phase II located on the north side of 1709
and 410' east of the intersection of Shady Oaks and 1709 (#13)
Respondents indicated the most
important factors adversely Ordinances, first readings, and related items:
impacting their Southlake 1) Ord. No. 678 Annexing territory known as "Solana"
operation are county and school 2) Ord. No. 679 Street name change from South Kimball Avenue to Crooked Lane
Blvd, from the intersection of South Kimball Ave. and Crooked Lane Blvd. to East
district taxes, zoning, and Continental Blvd. and a street name change for East Continental Blvd. to South
municipal taxes. Kimball Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park.
97 percent indicated that Other Items for Consideration:
ltactS with city staff had 1) Selection of a site for the new Joint City of Southlake/C.I.S.D. Administration
Building
:n courteous and their
problem or request had been Other Items for discussion
resolved. 1) A Joint Resolution of the City Council and CISD Board of Trustees establishing a
joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness.
Scheduled Meetings • Eubanks Development
June 16, 1997 ♦ Activity
Park Development Corp. House This information is from a workir
staff document. To confirm, call
6:00 p.m. Council Chamber Update 481-5581 ext. 744.
SPIN#14, #9, #10
7:00 p.m. White Chapel Room Planning & Zoning-June 19
97-055 Zoning, Ken Smith prop. (#7)
June 17, 1997 97-067 Preliminary Plat, Stonecrest
Business Park (#7)
City Council Meeting 97-074 Zoning, Solana
Council Chamber The Senior Advisory
7:00
p.m. Commission and the city staff 97-075 Specific Use Permit, Solana
97-076 Specific Use Permit, Chili's
June 19 1997 are proceeding with the 97-077 Specific Use Permit, La Scala
Planning & Zoning renovation of the Eubank's 97-072 Final Plat, Kirkwood Hollow
Council Chamber House as a Senior Activity Phase I (#2)
Center. Engineering staff is 97-073 Final Plat, South Hollow (#8)
97-021 Zoning/Concept Plan, Timber
preparing plans for the outside Lake Estates (#14)
portion of the house including 97-061 Site Plan, Church of Christ
Focus on SPIN #6 street access, parking, drainage (#15)
and sewer connections. A 97-062 Plat Revision, Church of
professional will be hired to Christ (#15)
City Council Meeting -June 24
�► design the floor plans. Once 96-162 Concept Plan, Telesupport
ISPIN2 plans are developed the East Campus (#8)
el construction phase will move
forward.
SPIN #6 is an area bordered
by Grapevine on the north and
east sides, SH 114 on the south SPIN #14
and residential properties on Road Closing y� t
the west, including Briarwood Developer Meeting STOP H
Estates. This area has tree June 16 - 7:00 p.m. Pearson Lane
lined streets and a blend of old White Chapel Room -_ Monday, June 16 "f
and new development. 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
Tom Ward is the SPIN #14 invites all Pearson Lane, just north of
Representative for SPIN #6. interested residents to 1709 will be closed to all
Tom is developing a subpage attend an informational traffic in order to resurface a
meeting on the proposed section of the.road disturbed by
on the city's web site to get Chapel Village residential
news and information out on development at the north the placement of utility lines
SPIN #6 issues. Residents with west corner of Continental associated with the construction
e-mail can receive a monthly and White Chapel. The of the Pearson Pump station.
newsletter. Please send a note development is for 19 SF-20
with your address to Tom at zoned residential lots on
tward2481@aol.com. 11.5 acres. Please call Doug
McKelvey 481-5581 ext. 894 You can visit our Web Site at:
for more information http://www.ci.southlake.tx.u:
• .
City of Southlake, Texas
• MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting
June 17, 1997
1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Request to Advertise for Bids for the Five Million Gallon Ground
Storage Tank located 2.700 feet North of Kirkwood Boulevard on the East Side of T. W.
King Road - We are ready to proceed with advertising for bids for the first phase of this
project, the tank construction. Note that we are well ahead of the schedule in the CIP
progress report. We had initially anticipated bidding this portion of the project out in
October, but we have been able to get ahead of schedule on this item. Bids for the pump
• station will be sought at a later date. Note in the Capital Projects Summary, handed out
at the retreat, that we budgeted approximately $2.7 million in our CIP budget for this
project, which will be funded by the certificates of obligation issued this year. Staff
recommends that you approve our request to advertise for bids for this project.
2. Agenda Item No. 5B, Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order Number One with
Wright Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along East Southlake
Boulevard from South White Chapel Boulevard East to Miron Drive - While this project
has been somewhat delayed due to problems with easement acquisition, there.has been
activity on the project. This change order, which increases the project cost by $21,185,
has been necessitated by the requirement to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway,
as well as additional appurtenances. The memo from Bob Whitehead, and the attached
change order dated May 16, 1997, describe the changes in detail. Staff recommends
approval of Change Order Number One.
. ..
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 2
Concerning the easement, we believe we have reached an agreement with the property
owners of the final needed easement. Mrs. Hayes has apparently agreed to provide the
easement for $11,000 and permission to build a carport on her lot. A carport is permitted
(as an accessory use when not attached to the house) under our zoning ordinance, so we
can work with them to accommodate their needs within the parameters of our ordinances.
We believe it is in the City's best interest to allow this so that we can move forward with
this project.
3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorizing_the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for
professional services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II - This item was approved
IIIby the SPDC at their June 9, 1997 meeting. Mesa was selected as the design team by a
selection committee consisting of Councilmember Scott Martin, SPDC member Ronnie
Kendall, Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation, and Sean Poe of our engineering
staff. The Mesa Group will be designing the next phase of Bicentennial Park, which will
include tennis courts and other park improvements. A copy of the contract approved by
the SPDC is included in your packet. If you have any questions about the selection of
Mesa, please feel free to call Scott Martin, Ronnie Kendall or Kim Lenoir. SPDC and
staff recommend approval of this contract.
4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Addendum to Cheatham and Associates Contract for professional
services to include Phase II design of Bob Jones Park, to include parking lots, drives.
irrigation, landscaping and other park improvements - You will recall that the SPDC and
City Council previously approved the original contract with Cheatham and Associates for
the preparation of a grading plan, contour map and preliminary site report for the first
illportion of Bob Jones Park. We are now moving to Phase II of this design work, which
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 3
will include the design of the parking lots, drives, irrigation and landscaping, and other
park improvements. The contract in your packet documents the scope of services for
Phase II work. Note that SPDC approved the addendum at their June 9 meeting. Staff
recommends approval of this addendum.
5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Request to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park.
Phase I - The grading plans for Bob Jones Park have been completed and a copy is
included in your packet for review. The SPDC approved this plan and the budget for this
initial portion of the Bob Jones Park work. These plans show the development of the
pond, grading for the berm (most of the fill will be excavated from the pond), soccer fields
and parking areas. Note that the master plan called for 11 soccer fields, but in reviewing
the plans with the Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association, they requested smaller fields.
• Thus, these plans show a total of 14 soccer fields.
The proposed bidding schedule is included in your packet. Of course, we are working
diligently to stay on our schedule for this project. It is our intention to advertise on June
22 and June 29, open bids on July 9, have SPDC award the bid on July 14, with City
Council action to award the bid on July 15. All of these dates move us closer to having
the fields ready for the Fall 1998 season. Staff recommends your approval of this request
to advertise for bids.
6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Excuse of absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two
consecutive Council meetings. This is on the agenda to enable Councilmember Muller to
comply with the City Charter. With this meeting, Councilmember Muller will miss two
consecutive regular meetings. The City Charter in Section 2.08(b) requires an elected
official to forfeit office for failure "...to attend two consecutive regular meetings of the
0
Council without being excused by the Council."
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 4
7. Agenda Item No. 7A. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-245. ZA 97-035. Rezoning of a
portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Miron Addition. There have been no changes since Council
approval of the first reacting 5-0. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Karen Gandy
if you have any questions regarding this request.
8. Agenda Item No. 7B. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-Y. Establishing regulations for
personal care facilities. There have been no changes in this proposed revision to the
Zoning Ordinance since Council approval on the first reading by consent agenda (5-0).
The memo from Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy points out the key provisions. There
is one item you will want to clarify with our attorneys: Section 2 that allows personal care
facilities with a SUP in the C-1 and C-2 districts. Normally, C-3 is cumulative of C-1 and
• C-2, and by extension, 0-1. Does the fact that C-3 is not mentioned in the amendment
restrict the SUP availability, and thus the use, only to C-1 and C-2? Is this what you
would intend? It is my understanding that this is what P&Z intended. Feel free to contact
Karen if you have any questions.
9. Agenda Item No. 7C. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 483-G. Subdivision Ordinance
(miscellaneous items). There have been only minor changes since Council approval of the
first reading on consent agenda (5-0). Councilmember Harris recommended some wording
changes and these changes have been made and are shown in the ordinance in a
redline/strikeout format. Upon further review, staff found that there were also changes
needed in sections 28 and 29 (pages 7C-9 and 7C-10). The changes reflected in
redline/strikeout, show the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
which was incorrectly shown on the first reading draft. Feel free to contact Greg Last if
you have any questions regarding this ordinance.
•
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
SAgenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 5
10. Agenda Item No. 7D. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 483-F, Amending Ordinance No.
483, Subdivision Ordinance, revising the entirety of Article VII, Park and Recreation
Dedication Requirements. The draft attached to your memo reflects the changes
recommended in the motion for approval on the first reading. Staff has also attempted to
provide the data and related graphic representations that were requested during the first
reading. The graphics show two alternative ratios for dedication in residential
developments (i.e., 1:25 and 1:50 ratios).
There are some issues related to this ordinance which we would like to have the city
attorney discuss in executive session. Section 7.05 A.2.a. (Pg. 70-6) provides that the
park dedication/park dedication fee would be based upon the equivalent cost of land in the
subdivision being developed. Would this result in (differential) fees based on the
S (differential) value of the land, with no correlation to the impact on parks? Does a person
living on a lot valued at $10,000 have any more impact on the park system than a person
living on a lot valued at $50,000? The attempt to get at this question was the reason for
the present method (i.e. average land cost) of arriving at the park dedication fee.
Section 7.06 (p70-7) deals with the issue of credits for private parks, differentiating
between private and semi-public. Should there perhaps be some definition of what
constitutes a semi-public park?
Feel free to contact Chris Carpenter (ext. 866) if you have questions regarding the
graphics and research, or Kim Lenoir if you have questions related to the desires of the
Park Board.
11. Agenda Item No. 7E. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-222, ZA 96-132, Rezoning and
IIIConcept Plan for Timarron Commercial, Tract III. The applicants have revised the
• Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 6
submittal to reflect the discussion during Council's approval of the first reading 6-0. Note
that there are some areas where the applicant has proposed language as a solution to the
general discussions held during the first reading. These areas are as follows:
Page DR-13 Bottom two bullets.
Page DR-14 Bottom bullet.
Page after DR-15 New language in ( ) at top of sheet.
Page DR-17 Bullets 3 and 4 at bottom of page.
Page DR-18 First bullet
Concept Plan Items referenced above are also included as notes on plan.
• Feel free to contact Karen Gandy, Greg Last or Dennis Killough regarding this request.
12. Agenda Item No. 7F. ZA 97-056. Development Plan of Timarron Addition. Village J.
There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. Timarron is proposing two
"Product Types" with this development plan, both of which have been developed in
previous phases of the development. Product type "D", which has 19 lots, is a
continuation of the "Golf Villa" concept east of this land area. Product type "A" is the
same product type as previous phases (Glendover, Strathmore, Bent Creek) which are
located south of Continental in three separate villages. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval 4-0-1 subject to the Development Plan Review
Summary. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy, Greg Last or Dennis Killough if you have
any questions regarding this application.
13. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 97-057, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village J.
There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning
• Commission recommended approval 4-0-1. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Greg
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 7
Last regarding this request.
14. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 97-063, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R,
and Lot 22. Block 55. Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One. This request
apparently originates due to confusion generated with marketing brochures and sales
efforts for lot sales in this area. Apparently some brochures generated by Timarron
showed open space or tree cover in the rear of these lots and there was some belief by
purchasers of the lots that this was open space not owned by individuals. Timarron is
attempting to resolve the issue by actually creating a common area along the rear of these
lots, thereby allowing the HOA to maintain the area. There are no technical issues
regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-0-
1 subject to the Plat Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Greg Last
• regarding this request.
15. Agenda Item No. 71. ZA 97-053, Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network. The
purpose of this request is to eliminate the 6' wood fence along the south and majority of
the east property lines. At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, several
surrounding neighbors spoke in favor of deleting the requirement for the fence. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 subject to the Site Plan
Review Summary.
16. Agenda Item No. 7J. ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II. This request
is a continuation of the existing project along FM 1709 and proposes an additional building
south of the existing buildings. There are no unresolved issues with this request. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0, accepting the building
articulation as proposed. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions.
•
• Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 8
17. Agenda Item No. 7K. ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II. This request
is also a continuation of the project currently under construction. Note that this
application is for the building east of the building currently under construction, as well as
the easternmost drive; however, it does not include the pad site at the far east end of the
site. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 with the
modifications as noted in the staff report, as well as on individual items in the site plan
review summary.
18. Agenda Item No.8A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No.678, an ordinance annexing the land
known as Solana. This is the first reading of the second annexation proceedings. This
may cause some confusion among the public and the media, however the procedure is
IIIbeing followed to ensure the validity of the action.
Specific details of the annexation proceedings and recent developments will be provided
to you in Executive Session.
You may have noticed that, in conformance with the City's zoning procedures, zoning
signs were placed last week at the Solana office complex to alert interested parties of the
City's intention to rezone the recently annexed property to the appropriate Non-residential
Planned Unit Development (NR-PUD) district, as well as for the proposed Specific Use
Permits for the sale of alcoholic beverages for the restaurant sites within the'complex.
Questions regarding the procedure can be directed to Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator,
at ext. 743.
19. Agenda Item No. 8B, Ordinance No. 679, Street Name Change from South Kimball
Avenue to Crooked Lane Boulevard for the portion of South Kimball Avenue from the
IIIIntersection of South Kimball Avenue and Crooked Lane Boulevard to East Continental
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
iioAgenda Item Comments and Other Items •
June 13, 1997
Page 9
Boulevard and a Street Name Change for East Continental Boulevard to South Kimball
Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park - As discussed at the Retreat, the purpose of this item
is to avoid anticipated confusion on these street names as we proceed with the extension
of South Kimball Avenue through Heritage Industrial Park. The map attached to Bob
Whitehead's memo clearly illustrates the need for this change. Note that three occupied
properties have been identified which will be affected by this change: Pumpco, Texas
School of Baseball, and Beech Overhead Door Company.
20. Agenda Item No. 10A. Selection of site for new joint City/CISD Administration Building.
As you had suggested at the retreat, we are bringing this item forward for your
consideration, in order for Council to make it clearly known to all the citizens which site
has been selected for the new City Hall.
•
21. Agenda Item No. 11A. Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent
School District Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for
drug and alcohol awareness. As noted in Community Services Coordinator Shelli Siemer's
memO, there have been some changes made to the draft resolution presented at the retreat.
She explains the changes and the reasons for them. It is our intent to bring this forward
as a consider item at your next meeting on June 24 with any further changes you may have
after this meeting. The CISD Board of Trustees will meet on Wednesday, June 25. It
is anticipated they will have the resolution on their agenda as well.
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
22. Water bill cycle change. Recall that we changed our billing cycle. Every customer has
IIIbeen notified that our billing office is mailing bills today to those persons in the 2nd cycle.
• Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 10
This cycle included water usage from May and part of June. Persons affected live east of
White Chapel Rd. You may receive phone calls from residents that have forgotten that
their billing cycle was changing. The bill they receive in the middle of July will be for
a 30-day period.
23. Monthly Financial Statements. The financial statements for May will be distributed at the
meeting on Tuesday. This is due to the preparation for the June Retreat, FY 95-96 audit
readjustments being recorded, and re-journalization of the general ledger since October.
24. IRL Race Weekend/Countryfest at the Texas Motor Speedway - Events at the Texas Motor
Speedway continue to require attention from the Department of Public Safety, although not
to the extent once anticipated. The recent IRL Indy Race and Truck Race weekend
IIIproduced heavy traffic, but not to the point of having to fully implement our traffic
management plan. In fact, only one officer worked overtime and the entire weekend was
fairly uneventful. As you may know, Countryfest is scheduled for this upcoming
weekend, with Rockfest scheduled for the following weekend. All traffic officers will be
assigned special shifting patterns for that weekend. DPS is planning to supplement these
officers with two or three additional police patrol officers, since these types of events will
likely result in more "police" issues than traffic problems.
25. Bicentennial Park Selected Best in Greater Northeast Tarrant County - As mentioned at
the Retreat, Bicentennial Park was highlighted in the Fort Worth Star Telegram as the
"Best Park in Northeast Tarrant County," as selected by kids in the area. A copy of the
article is attached in case you missed the article.
26. Park Board Meeting Highlights - Your packet contains the minutes from the June 9, 1997
110 Park Board meeting. The minutes are fairly detailed, however, there are a few highlights
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 11
worth pointing out:
✓A demonstration of the complaint tracking system was provided by Kevin Hugman.
Using a computer and LCD projector, he showed the Board how our manual tracking
system will be converted to an automated system.
✓The Board discussed the Recreation Liaisons/Staff review of Success Strategies: A
Recreation Management Program. Items addressed were instructor hiring and
management, customer satisfaction processes, class size and content determinations,
safety, and revenue generation.
✓The Board reviewed a budget prioritization list and survey results, and compiled a list
• of budget items for recommendation to the City Council.
We hope you will take a moment to review the minutes. Also note that the SPDC
approved the grading plans for Bob Jones Park, Phase I, approved an addendum to the
contract with Cheatham and Associates for landscaping, irrigation, etc., and approved a
contract with Mesa Design for engineering and design of Bicentennial Park expansion
Phase II as noted in several of the consent agenda items.
27. Tree Preservation Ordinance Workgroup. The tree preservation ordinance workgroup has
met three times and is progressing with discussions regarding the proposed draft from
Keep Southlake Beautiful. Although there are several divergent opinions, healthy .
discussions are bringing to light a variety of issues that could enhance the preservation of
trees in the city. I am sure Councilmember Martin would welcome the opportunity to
discuss the progress of the committee should you be interested. Greg Last has also
• attended the meetings if you have questions and Councilmember Martin is unavailable.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
SAgenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 12
28. Telesupport. Mr. Jim Munday of Telesupport is working to resolve the questions
presented by Council during review of his concept plan at the last meeting. We will be
meeting with him in the next few days and will try to update you on progress at your
meeting. Feel free to contact me or Greg Last if you have any questions.
29. New Park Planning and Construction Superintendent. Mr. Ben Henry has started this
week in this position. Mr. Henry has a degree in landscape architecture and is a licensed
irrigator. He comes to us from Dunaway and Associates where he worked for 7 years,
performing site plan analysis and overseeing construction inspections.
We have also selected a Landscape Administrator, who should begin employment with
• Southlake in approximately a month. He must give his notice to his current employer and
then he wants to take some vacation before starting here. He has an urban forestry
background: we will provide you more information once he begins work.
30. CIP Progress Report. As requested at the retreat, Public Works staff will provide an
updated status report of each capital improvements project in a narrative format beginning
in July. It is our intent to provide this report to you at the first meeting of every month.
31. National Victims Assistance Academy. Community Services Officer Carrie Fullington has
been chosen to attend the National Victim Assistance Academy, June 12-18, at the
University of North Texas. The Academy accepted only 200 persons nationwide and only
50 from the southwest.
Officer Fullington will gain knowledge of victims' rights and services and victim
• assistance for a variety of crimes including: assault/robbery. child victims, domestic
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13. 1997
Page 13
violence, sexual assault, elderly crimes, drunk driving, hate/bias crimes, stalking
victims, victims with disabilities, and workplace violence.
This training will enable Officer Fullington to better serve the Department of Public Safety
and the residents of Southlake.
32. Southlake In Review - Special Edition. The Public Information Office is editing the final
draft of the community newsletter and will send it to the printer on June 17. It should be
mailed to residents on June 24.
33. Newspaper Clippings. Per the comments made by Councilmembers at the retreat,
III newspaper clippings will no longer be included in your packets. The Public Information
Office retains copies of all newspaper articles related to the City of Southlake. They are
available for your review at any time. If you would like copies of specific articles, please
contact Tracy Southers at ext. 819.
34. TIF Update. Staff is continuing to develop a preliminary project and finance plan for the
Tax Increment Finance Zone. We are working with Jim Sabonis, the City's financial
advisor, on various scenarios for implementation of the TIF. At the June 24 City Council
meeting, these will be presented for Council's consideration. At that time, staff will
request Council to pass a resolution setting a public hearing on August 26, 1997 for the
creation of the TIF. Once the resolution is passed, we will be meeting with the
overlapping taxing entities to discuss their participation in the TIF. Another copy of the
schedule we handed out at the retreat is attached.
35. Retreat Follow Up. Staff is compiling the information and suggestions provided by
IPCouncil at the retreat. This information will be very beneficial as we begin the budget
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 14
process. For those of you who were unable to attend, a video recording of the
proceedings will be available for your review.
One piece of information that was not included in your retreat packet was the compilation
of departmental accomplishments. We hope to have this information included in your
packet for the June 24 meeting. As you would expect, there have been substantial
developments in every department. Once we began putting this information together, we
realized there were other things that needed to be added in order to be complete.
36. Update on Metro Pool Chemicals, Inc. We met this week with Mr. Meyers of Metro Pool
Chemical to discuss the problems associated with the incompatibility of his use in the
surrounding area and options for relocating his business. Mr. Meyers understands the
• problems and is agreeable to working with the City to find a mutually acceptable solution.
He is meeting with his advisors this week and will inform us soon of how he would like
to proceed.
37. Note the attached letter from Barry Friedman referencing the May 21, 1997 Council
Meeting and the vote on the TETCO Station. I am going to respond to his letter point-by-
point. I hope to have this accomplished by Monday morning. (The situation was
exacerbated by the P&Z's decision to ignore the advice of the attorney and vote to deny
the site plan regardless of the statutory provision.) I will forward a copy of my response
to you as soon as it is completed.
38. Note the attached letter from Jan Francis. It speaks for itself.
39. I will be out of the office most of Monday, meeting with our attorneys regarding the
• Westlake lawsuits. Thus I will not be able to meet with you in the normally scheduled
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
• Agenda Item Comments and Other Items
June 13, 1997
Page 15
Monday afternoon briefings.
The hearings will resume Friday June 20, at 2:00 p.m. Contrary to what you may have
read, nothing has changed with where we are in the annexation process.
•
•
. ..
K . hsT
OF GREATER NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY
1 '
g
C
i a , ."�
,i .1 1. Y T�1
0 .• .
Oil
�. 114110.
t 1T
1 ....i
Sear-rcicgr:un/I Ii u i v 1:n
Susanne Brett of Gnuhlake holds on to her kite at Bicentennial Park in Southlake. d
r
A
' BEST PARK:
Bicentennial Park,Southlake known parks. area,sand volleyball facilities and a wild- 'p
Included in the expansion was Adven- scape area with wildflowers.
Bicentennial Park is in the center of ture Alley Playground.a 1-acre,fully "Bicentennial Park has something for
Southlake,easily visible from Farm Road handicapped-accessible playground with everyone,"said Kim Lenoir,director of 1
1709 and White Chapel Road.But its repu- areas for toddlers and older children.Four parks and recreation in Southlake."It's I
tation has extended beyond city limits, baseball fields were also added,giving well-maintained,too.It's really getting a
Expansion completed in March 1996 Bicentennial It)baseball and softball lot of regional attention."
and a busy schedule of baseball and soft- fields.A new entrance off Farm Road 1709
hall tournaments have helped make Bicen- adds to the park's beauty. —David Thomas
tennial Park one of the region's better- Other park features include a picnic
S
Reinvestment Zone #1 , Southlake
Creation Process / Timeframe
Preliminary Schedule of Events
Jun-97 Jul-97 A u g-97 Sep-97
SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS
1 ! 2h314I516j7 l 1 ; 2j314 ! 5 1 2 1 2 3 I 4 5 I 6
8 ! 9 10� 11I12!! 13114 61 7 ' 8 9 '110111 ! 12 31 4 , 51 61 7 : 819 7 8 9 10111 12113
15116' 17, 181920',21 1311415161718 19 10, 11112I13!, 14! 15116 14, 15116i17118, 19'120
22i23 24 25,26_27128 20121 22 23 24,25126 17'i18119i20 21122 23 21 22 23�24125 26127
29130 I 1 27!2829'30,31 24' 25126': 27; 28 29 30 28129 30 ! j
311 , 1
Date Day Event
24-Jun-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
Adoption of Resolution setting a Public Hearing on the creation of
Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake
25-Jun-97 Wednesday Forward Notice of Public Hearing to Overlapping Taxing Units
(Included must be a copy of Public Hearing Resolution, a notice requesting
each Taxing Unit to designate within 15 days a representative to
meet with City and a copy of the Preliminary Project/Financing Plan)
SAug-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
1st Reading of Ordinance creating Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake
10-Aug-97 Sunday Publish Notice of Public Hearing on the creation of
Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake
26-Aug-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
(1) Hold Public Hearing on creation of Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake
(Present Preliminary Project/Financing Plan)
(2)2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance creating
Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake
2-Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
(I) Approve interlocal agreements with Overlapping
Taxing Units (Formalizing Commitment to Participation)
(2) Appointment of Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake -
Board Members and Board Chairman
1-Sep-97 Monday Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake Board Meeting
Adoption of Final Project/Financing Plan
4110Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
1st Reading of Ordinance approving Final Project/Financing Plan
16-Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting
2nd Reading of Ordinance approving Final Project/Financing Plan
Upcoming Meelidigs and Events
16 .
June 16 - 4.6, 1997
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
June 16 June 17 June 18 June 19 June 20 June 21 June 22
9:00am SKY- 11:30am Mayor lunch 7:30am Metroport Possible Packet Day for 3rd Regular CC � Rock Fest @ i
Director's Mtg @ w/CM Mtg g Q TBD ,W 1 Texas Motor
Admin 5:00pm City Council 9:30am Sexual mtg (6/24) Speedway
9:30am CEH w/ work session; 7:00 Harassment Trng @
attorneys regular session CCRm-spry; non- 2:00pm Westlake
7:00pm SPIN #9,10, - spry. 1:30 Bankruptcy-hearing
14-McMahan @ 6:00pm CEH-NETAC on dismissal Dallas @
WhCh Rm 6:00pm P&Z Mtg
work session; 7:00pm
regular session
Kim Lenoir out of office j
June 23 June 24 June 25 June 26 June 27 June 28 June 29
9:00am Director's/ 5:00pm Chamber New 10:00am CMO Staff 7:00pm SPIN PACKET DAY
Staff Agenda Mtgs @ Mbr Recpt © Mtg Standing Comm Mtg
CCRm D namic Travel 7:00pm ZBA @ CC
11:30am Chamber 7:00pm 3rd Reg CC rrn
Luncheon @ Solana Mt.
_ (NO BRIEFING)
7:00pm BBA @
CCRm
June 30 July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 July 5 July 6
8:30am Director's 11:30am CEH lunch 6:00pm P&Z Mtg; wk
Mt_ @ Admin w/Mayor session 6:00; regular
' Cr,
11:30am CC briefing 5:00pm City Council mtg @ 7:00 �
from Staff Wk Session begins;
5:30pm News&Times/ , regular mtg @ 7:00
DIs Morning News- July 4th Holiday-CITY
Merger Mixer @ HALL CLOSED
Delaney
Timarron Parade 9am;
Timber Lake Parade
10am.
4
Calendar subject to change call for more details 6/13/1997
...... . . IJJ. IJIO ., . L. rrancis ltl1 I ono-��uo p, 1
• M E M p R AN D
2 wffo
To: Mayor Stacy 27
From: Janice L. Francis
OFFICE OF CITY 1
SECRETARY
Subject Neighborhood poll on the potential for a stadium/sports complex on Timarron
tract EEL
Date: June 10, 1997
CC: City Council Members
Curtis Hawk, City Manager
Mr. Mayor, City Council Members, and Curtis Hawk,
�mmay, June 7 there was a meeting held at my house for the purpose of discuss ing T��n
opment of Tract III with Council member Guy Fawk& At that meeting I
polled the 17 neighbors(all residents of ifighland Estates,
in attendance and found that no one objected to the possibility of develop
t off Highland)
built on that property. They all agreed that a butsports otlOx being
stadium/sports complex golf course world be most desirable, that a
our mP would not be dal to the safety of our children or the valuation of
• property. Since only objections were heard at the last council meeting, I felt it was important
to let you know not all of us arc against the
am a SPIN representative, this meetingI potential for a stadium/sports comply, Although I
llce many others that have been held in the last few
months, was a neighborhood meeting,not a SPIN meeting.
►�,1 CX',S t � `o cAi-
•
. �`
IP
Barry Friedman, CFP
102 Killdeer Court
Southlake.rx 76092
- -------------------- — -
Telep2hone 817-481-81 18
.. :17-421-0359
re , n
0 reference to a city council meeting on May 21, 1997 1 27
OFFICE OF CITY
SECRETARY !
TO: Mayor Rick Stacey and the City Council
CC: Fort Worth Star Telegram
The Grapevine Sun
FROM: The concerned residents of Meyers Meadow and Southridge Lakes.
Subject: Southlake, Texas - a small town with big city politics....Unfortunately.
What ever happened to the rights and interests of the local resident, the taxpayer, the
0 voter? It is easy to see how many of us have been disenfranchised by the size, scope and
dynamics of National, State and Big City politics. While it is unfortunate that many of
our population have felt that they have no voice and have therefore given up, it is even
more distressing to see the blatant disregard of the wishes of the populous by politicians
when we do take the time and exert the effort to be heard.
Many pundits have said that the American political system will ( or already has ) fallen
out of the hands of the electorate because of apathy. The politicians have been listening
and have proceeded to believe that the only mandate that they have is to serve
themselves or the BIG MONEY interests that help them get elected and re-elected.
What in the world am I talking about? Well, I am a resident of the lovely Northeast
Tan-ant city of Southlake, home of the Carroll Dragons. This is a wonderful place to live
and raise children. The air is still clean, the folks are very friendly, the teachers and
school administrators really care, for the most part, about the students and we love living
here.
Herein, however, lies our gripe. In our lovely little town we are beginning to experience
the pangs of rapid growth. As people discover where and what we are, they believe as
we do and move into our community. With the increasing number of people obviously
comes the need for facilities and services to accommodate the community and its'
ink residents. This is understandable, but there is also an obligation to be responsible in how
we grow and responsive to the needs and desires of the community.
- • w�
There is a specific issue at hand, it is the matter of a TETCO (Mobil) gas station and
convenience store that is to be constructed right across from Carroll High School and
adjacent to two of our prized residential neighborhoods. We are not opposed to growth
and do not object to the need to provide services, but with three gas stations within 1/2
mile of this location does this particular facility have to be built across the street from
our High School.
This project, which was turned down by our planning and zoning commission by a vote
of 6 to I, was recently approved by our city council over the vigorous objections of the
residents of the community. Not only did the mayor and council approve the project, but
they were effusive in their praise for the fine job that the developer had done and what a
wonderful asset to the community this gas station and convenience store would be. The
justification for this approval by the council was couched in the statement, "The zoning
for that property is in place and we do not have the power to do anything about it." What
in the world did we elect this people to do, if not to look out for our interests.
There is a simple provision in the zoning code that could have easily taken care of this
matter, and that is that the zoning applies "unless it conflicts with the health, welfare or
• safety" of the residents. This is a problem traffic corner now, and our children are being
put at risk every day. With the expanding student population and the increasing traffic,
the presence of this facility will do nothing but exacerbate the problem. Where is the
council's sense of responsibility to it's electorate and not to the special interests of
commercial enterprise. It is sometime hard to forget that our governing body is
representative of the commercial sector, when looking for them to represent us.
Why the location across from the High School in a community that does not even have a
public library, would that not be a significantly better utilization and location? Why
another gas station here when so many other parts of the community, with more
commercial development, are under served by gas stations? What possible benefit can
this possibly serve the community and why has the mayor and council taken such a
strong personal interest in this particular project.
When questioned at the May 20, 1997 council meeting in which the public was invited to
speak on the subject, this question was asked of the mayor, " Is it right for us to assume
that the decision has already been made that this project will proceed in spite of our
protests?", and the answer, stated with his usual jovial asides, was " Yes, you are right in
your assumption". False statements were even made to audience at this meeting in
defense of their position. Our erstwhile Mayor claimed that if we were worried about
the safety of our children due to the traffic in the area, we should not drive them to
ANL school, but let them travel by school bus which is provided for every student. Good try
71.11!)/ Mr. Mayor. but no cigar.
First of all, many of our students choose to go to school early to do extra work or to
participate in extra activities and we as parents encourage that behavior by driving them.
next, our community is not served by a bus to the High School, since we are right across
the street.
Well, Mr. Mayor Stacey and Honorable City Council, your time will come and the
citizens that you ignore today will not ignore you tomorrow. And to our "friends" at
TETCO, we would like you to know that you will not be considered a Good Neighbor in
our community and you will not receive the support and respect that we provide to our
Good Neighbors in the business community.
Last but not least, we would like to go on record as stating that since you all have
ignored the advice of the planning and zoning commission and public safety and have
gone ahead with this project in spite of the consideration of the health, welfare or safety
of the residents, we are going to hold each and every one of you, Mr. Mayor, Council
persons and TETCO, personally liable should any harm come to even one of our
children, or indeed to any of our citizens as a result of this irresponsible action on your
part. We will also "SEE YOU AT THE POLLS".
City of Southlake,Texas
110 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 17, 1997
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall
I
WORK SESSION: 5:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda.
1
REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to order. Invocation.
2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas
Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted
list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive session will be held from
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session.
• 3. Approval
ppro al of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on June 3, 1997.
4. Reports:
A. Mayor's Report.
B. City Manager's Report.
C. SPIN Report.
D. Park and Recreation Board Report.
E. Southlake Youth Action Commission Report.
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and
I considered in its normal sequence.
110 5. Consent:
I
. City of Southlake,Texas
S
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 2
A. Request to advertise for bids for the five million gallon ground storage
tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Boulevard on the east side of
T.W. King Road.
B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. One with Wright
Construction Company for the installation of the 20-inch water main along
East Southlake Boulevard, from South White Chapel Boulevard east to
Miron Drive.
C. Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for
professional services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II.
D. Addendum to Cheatham and Associates' contract for professional services
to include Phase II design of Bob Jones Park, to include parking lots,
drives, irrigation, landscaping, and other park improvements.
4 E. Request to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park, Phase I.
F. Excuse the absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two
consecutive Council meetings.
REGULAR AGENDA
6. Public Forum.
7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearing, and related items.
A. Ordinance No. 480-245, 2nd reading (ZA 97-035), Rezoning of a portion of Lot
2, Block 1, Miron Addition, according to the plat records in Cabinet A, Slide
1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 0.346 acres. Location: West side of
Miron Drive being approximately 680' south of the intersection of East Southlake
Boulevard and Miron Drive. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park
District. Requested zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District.
Owner/Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
PUBLIC HEARING.
B. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 2nd reading, Establishing regulations for personal care
facilities.
S
PUBLIC HEARING.
C. Ordinance No. 483-G, 2nd reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items).
City of Southlake,Texas
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 3
PUBLIC HEARING.
D. Ordinance No. 483-F, 2nd reading, Amending Ordinance No. 483, The
Subdivision Ordinance, revising the entirety of Article VII, Park and Recreation
Dedication Requirements.
PUBLIC HEARING.
E. Ordinance No. 480-222, 2nd reading, (ZA 96-132), Rezoning and Concept Plan
for Timarron Commercial, Tract III, being approximately 200.82 acres situated in
the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B,
2B1A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being
Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D. Location: North of State
Highway 114, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of East Highland Street, and
west of North Kimball Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and
"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested zoning is "NR-P-U-D" Non-
Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Park to include
the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-
2" Office District, `C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "B-1" Business
Service Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "HC" Hotel
District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE"
Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owner
and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #4 and #6.
PUBLIC HEARING.
F. ZA 97-056, Development Plan of Timarron Addition, Village J, being legally
described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey,
Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a
portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract
3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. Location: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of
Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south
of East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned
Unit Development District. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron L:P. SPIN
Neighborhood #9.
PUBLIC HEARING.
G. ZA 97-057, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village J, being legally
described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey,
411 Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a
portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract
3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. Location: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of
Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south
City of Southlake,Texas
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 4
of East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned
Unit Development District. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron L.P. SPIN
Neighborhood #9.
H. ZA 97-063, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22
(Common Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One,
being a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson
Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 2.880 acres situated in the Obediah
W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location: South side of Saxon Trail at the
intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon Trail. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D"
Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron
L.P. SPIN Neighborhood #13.
ZA 97-053, Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network, being legally
described as Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of
• Southlake, Texas, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Cabinet A, Slide 2120, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being
approximately 3.97 acres situated in the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706.
Location: South side of Ravenaux Drive approximately 500' west of the
intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current
zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. Owner/Applicant: Christian Men's
Network. SPIN Neighborhood #11.
PUBLIC HEARING.
J. ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II, being legally described as
Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3434, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.058 acres situated in
the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. Location: South side of East
Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 700' east of the intersection
of South Kimball Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. Current zoning is "C-2"
Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd.
Applicant: Realty Capital Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
PUBLIC HEARING.
K. ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II, being legally described as Lot
2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231,
Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.8685 acres
City of Southlake,Texas
• Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 5
situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. Location: North side
of West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410' east of the intersection of
Shady Oaks Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current zoning
is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: 1709 Southlake
Oaks, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #13.
PUBLIC HEARING.
8. Ordinances, first reading, and related items:
A. Ordinance No. 678, 1st reading, An ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas,
annexing the hereinafter more particularly described territory generally described
as an area comprising approximately 480 acres abutting State Highway 114, known
as "Solana", and an area comprising approximately 27 acres abutting that property
to the City of Southlake, Texas, and extending the boundary limits of said City so
as to include said territory within said City limits and granting to all owners of
property all of the rights and privileges of other citizens and binding said owners
and other persons within the annexed area by all the Acts, Ordinances, and
S
regulations of said City; approving a service plan for such territory; providing a
severability clause; and providing for an effective date.
B. Ordinance No. 679, 1st reading, Street name change from South Kimball Avenue
to Crooked Lane Boulevard, for the portion of South Kimball Avenue from the
intersection of South Kimball Avenue and Crooked Lane Boulevard to East
Continental Boulevard and a street name change for East Continental Boulevard to
South Kimball Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park.
9. Resolutions (no items this agenda)
10. Other item for consideration:
A. Selection of site for new joint City of Southlake/C.I.S.D. Administration Building.
11. Other item for discussion:
A. A Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent School District
Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and
alcohol awareness.
0 12. Adjournment.
City of Southlake,Texas
S
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 6
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667
North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, June 13, 1997, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter
551. ` oJ`/vALAK4�
Xiiiiiviit,v =0 %"
andra L. LeGrand A,.'
City Secretary
,r�
g itigjit
If you plan to attend this public meeting and ave a disability that requires special needs, please
advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable
accommodations will be made to assist you.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
IIIPENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071
The City Council may consider the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects:
1. Vicci Winchester vs. Dan McKee Water Service Company, and the City of Southlake
1995.
2. D/FW-White Chapel Ltd. vs. State of Texas and the City of Southlake. 1996.
3. Town of Westlake, Texas et al vs. City of Southlake, Texas 1997.
4. City of Southlake vs. Kathy A. Brown, William J. Justus, trustee, William James Elder
and James M. Elder, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Trust. 1997.
5. Town of Westlake, Texas vs. City of Southlake, Carroll Huntress, et al. 1997.
6. Legal action against Scott Bradley, Charla Bradshaw, Abe Bush, and Fred Held.
LAND ACQUISITION-SECTION 551.072 •
The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property. After
discussion of land acquisition in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open
session.
PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074
7 The City Council may consider the appointment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or
dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City
City of Southlake,Texas
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 17, 1997
page 7
Attorney, and City Boards and Commission members. A complete list of the City Boards and
Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's office.
DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076
Regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or
devices. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote
taken will be in open session by the City Council.
If personnel issues or litigation arise or a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as
to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, the issues or matters will be
discussed in executive session. 6/17/97
d:\wp-files\cc-6-17-97\wpd\s1
•
t
City of Southlake,Texas
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING NNE 19. 1997
•
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 P.M. TO 6:30 P.M.
1. Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to seek the
advice of the City Attorney.
2. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session.
WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of June 5,
1997.
3. Administrative Comments.410
CONSENT AGENDA:
All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will
be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Commission
member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of
business and considered in its normal sequence.
4. Consent: ZA 97-072, FINAL PLAT FOR KIRKWOOD HOLLOW, PHASE I, being
approximately 54.894 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207,
being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A 1, 3A4A, and
3A4B and in the James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract
1. This plat proposes 70 residential lots, 2 common areas, and 1 city park: Location:
West side of North White Chapel Boulevard at the intersection of Sweet Street and
North White Chapel Boulevard. Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development. Owner/Applicant: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. SPIN
Neighborhood#2. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June
13, 1997.
5. Consent: ZA 97-073, FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW, PHASE II, being
S
approximately 10.821 acres situated in the J.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No.
529, and being Tracts 6B2 and 6B3. This plat proposes 17 residential lots and
1 common area. Location: North side of East Continental Boulevard
approximately 1,100' east of the intersection of Carlisle Lane and East
r `
City of Southlake,Texas
REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
JUNE 19, 1997
PAGE 2
Continental Boulevard. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential
District. Owner: Vista Oaks Development, Ltd. Applicant: Carter & Burgess,
Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1,
dated June 13, 1997.
REGULAR AGENDA:
6. Consider: ZA 97-055, REZONING of approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas
Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. Location:
Approximately 200' east of the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning:
"AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District.
Owner/Applicant: Ken Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
Public Hearing.
7. Consider: ZA 97-067, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONECREST BUSINESS PARK,
being legally described as approximately 43.69 acres situated in the Thomas
Easter Survey,Abstract No.474,and being Tracts 5, 5A, 11 A, and 11B. This plat
proposes twenty-four (24) lots. Location: East side of Crooked Lane and
approximately 560' south of the intersection East Southlake Boulevard (F.M.
1709) and Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District.
IIIOwners/Applicants: Ken and Darla Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
Public Hearing.
8. Consider: ZA 97-074, REZONING on property described as approximately 485 acres,
known as Solana and situated in the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015;
T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No.
1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey,
Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No.
2025,Tarrant County,Texas,the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County,
Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the
same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County,Texas. Location: South and West
of State Highway No. 114, East of Precinct Line Road , and North of the Town
of Westlake. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning:
"NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use
Business Complex,known as Solana,to include the following uses: "0-2"Office
District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-I" Business Service Park
District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Owners:
International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas
Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners-Westlake
Partnership, and MTP-IBM Phases II & III Joint Venture.
Public Hearing.
•
•
City of Southlake,Texas
REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
JUNE 19, 1997
• PAGE 3
9. Consider: ZA 97-075, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT SOLANA
MARRIOTT HOTEL, on the property described as Lot 2R, Block 2, of a final
plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed
in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map
and Plat Records, being approximately 6.286 acres. Location: 5 Village Circle.
Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD"
Non-residential Planned Unit Development with "0-2" Office District, "C-3"
General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS"
Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Hospitality
International, Inc. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake
Partnership.
Public Hearing.
10. Consider: ZA 97-076, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT CHILI'S
RESTAURANT AT SOLANA, on the property described as Lot 1R, Block 2,
of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2,Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No.
1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County
Map and Plat Records. Location: 3 Village Circle, Suite 108. Current Zoning:
"AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential
Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2" Office District,"C-3"
General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS"
Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Chili's
Beverage Company. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake
Partnership.
Public Hearing.
11. Consider: ZA 97-077, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT RAKIP (JIM)
LUSHA D/B/A LA SCALA RESTAURANT, on the property described as Lot
1R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park
Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the
Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. Location: 3 Village Circle, Suite 115.
Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD"
Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2"
Office District,"C-3"General Commercial District,"B-1"Business Service Park
District, "CS" Community Service District and"HC" Hotel District. Applicant:
La Scala Ristorante Italiano, Inc. Owner: Maguire / Thomas Partners-
Westlake/Southlake Partnership.
Public Hearing.
111
t
City of Southlake,Texas
REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
JUNE 19, 1997
• PAGE 4
12. Consider: ZA 97-021, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN OF TIMBER LAKE
ESTATES, being approximately 18.173 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey,
Abstract No. 18 and being Tract 4F, Tract 4F1, and a portion of Tract 5A1.
Location: South side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) at the intersection of
West Jellico Circle and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning:
"AG" Agricultural District (Tract 4F and Tract 4F1) and "CS" Community
Service District (Tract 5A1). Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family
Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Ernest Owen. SPIN Neighborhood
#15.
Public Hearing.
13. Consider: ZA 97-061, SITE PLAN OF SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST
EDUCATION BUILDING, being the proposed Lot 3R-1, J. G. Allen No. 18
Addition on property legally described as Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition,
an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot
1 and a portion of Lot 2, Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-44, Page
40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to
the State of Texas by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153-127796-90,
a certified copy of which is recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection
of Brock Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning:
"CS" Community Service District. Applicant: Larry D. Stone. Owner:
Southlake Church of Christ. SPIN Neighborhood #15.
Public Hearing.
14. Consider: ZA 97-062,PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 3R-1, J. G. ALLEN
NO. 18 ADDITION, being a revision of Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an
addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot
1 and a portion of Lot 2, Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-44, Page
40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to
the State of Texas by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153-127796-90,
a certified copy of which is recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection
of Brock Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning:
"CS" Community Service District. Owner and Applicant: Southlake Church of
Christ. SPIN Neighborhood #15.
Public Hearing.
•
City of Southlake,Texas
REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
il
JUNE 19, 1997
PAGE 5
15. Consider: DUE TO CASE RESOLUTION NO. 97-22, THE FOLLOWING CASES
WILL NOT BE HEARD ON THIS AGENDA AND WILL BE
CONTINUED TO JULY 3, 1997:
Case #ZA 97-064, Site Plan of Southridge Center, Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge
Lakes, Phase C-1. (Public Hearing)
Case #ZA 97-065, Development Plan of Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek,
Phase II. (Public Hearing)
Case #ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek,
Phase II. (Public Hearing)
16. Consider: MEETING ADJOURNMENT.
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667
North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, June 13, 1997 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 551��, ov�StHCq���i��i,�
I/440, I
�j O R`
} j
Sandra L. LeGrand co se.
City Secretary r.
**it of
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs,please advise the City Secretary
48 hours in advance at 481-5581,extension 704,and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
If a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session.
•
L:\WP-FILES\MTG\AGMI997\06-I9-97.WPD
0
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 3, 1997
COUNCILMIEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy, Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans (arrived
at 9:40 p.m.); Deputy Mayor Pro Tem David Harris. Members: Scott Martin, Gary Fawks,
Wayne Moffat.
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Pamela Muller.
STAFF PRESENT: Curtis Hawk, City Manager, Shaba Yelverton, Assistant City Manager;
Darcey Imm, Assistant to the City Manager; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager; Lou
Ann Heath, Director of Finance; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Ron Harper, City
Engineer; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator;
Shawn Poe, Engineer; Kim Lenior, Director of Parks and Recreation; Billy Campbell, Director
of Public Safety; E. Allen Taylor Jr., City Attorney; and Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary.
• WORK SESSION: The work session was held to discuss agenda items by Council and staff.
INVOCATION: Deputy Mayor Pro Tem David Harris.
Mayor Rick Stacy called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:15 p.m.
Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session
Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session
pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, 551.072, 551.074,
551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending
and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and
to consider the appointment and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment of
specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devises.
Council adjourned into executive session at 6:18 p.m.
Council returned to open session at 7:20 p.m.
No action was taken as the result of the executive session.
0
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item #3, Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes
Approval was given to the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on May 20, 1997;
the Special City Council meetings held on May 26, and May 27, 1997 and the Regular City
Council meeting on May 27, 1997.
Motion: Harris
Second: Fawks
Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #4-A, Mayor's Report
Mayor Rick Stacy informed the audience that Councilmember Pamela Muller would not be present
at the meeting tonight as her father, Walter Muller, passed away on June 2, 1997. The Mayor
asked that we keep Pamela and her family in our prayers.
Mayor Stacy also referenced the following items during the Mayor's Report:
• ■ Announcement of the June Retreat to be held on June 10 and 11, 1997. On June 10, the
Carroll School Board will be meeting with Council at 6:15 p.m. The June 11 session will
begin at 8:30 a.m. ending at 8:00 p.m.
• The Northeast Leadership Forum will hold a meeting on June 13, 1997 at 11:30 a.m. to
be held in the Library Conference Room at the City of Euless. The Mayor stated he will
be attending and invited other Councilmembers to also attend.
• The final celebration of the 40th birthday of the City of Southlake will be held on
September 17, 1997. More information to come.
• The Mayor stated he signed contracts today for improvements to Love Henry Court, Dov e
Road from SH 114 to White Chapel Boulevard, and Continental Boulevard. He also noted
he and the City Manager met with Wes Held with TxDot this week, and he was assured
that Southlake roadway improvements on SH 114 cannot be far off schedule. • The start
date is 1998 with completion by 2000.
• Mayor Stacy stated the First Annual Carroll Education Foundation will be held on June
6 with a roast of Dale Hansen. The Mayor noted he will be attending and will serve as
the auctioneer.
• • A reception was held for Congressman Dick Armey last week, and was attended by
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 2 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Councilmembers Fawks and Evans. The City Manager, Curtis Hawk, also attended.
Fawks noted this is the third event for Armey in our area in less than one year.
• Other items mentioned are the Carroll Bank Booster Golf Tournament; ground breaking
for Ebby Holiday at the corner of F.M. 1709 and Carroll Avenue; Summer Santa
program; and the MetroPort Meals on Wheels Golf Tournament.
Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report
Curtis Hawk, City Manger, informed the public that Tarrant County will participate with
Southlake on two roadway reconstruction projects this year, including: North White Chapel
Boulevard from Dove Road to the Tarrant County line; and, Brumlow, from Continental
Boulevard to SH 26. The City will furnish the material and the County will furnish the labor as
outlined in the interlocal agreement.
Agenda Item #11, SPIN Report
Roger Hutton, SPIN #11 Representative, 1900 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake. Mr. Hutton stated
he plans to participate in the SPIN annual review of boundaries for SPIN groups. He worked wit h
S
SPIN #11 neighborhoods in the solicitation of projects for public works for the upcoming year.
He expressed appreciation to Mayor Stacy and Councilmembers and staff for the time and
commitment they have with SPIN. He stated the City Manager's office is committed to SPIN and
it is greatly appreciated by all residents of Southlake. He noted he appreciates Karen Gandy,
which was his first encounter with city personnel.
Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda
Mayor Stacy stated agenda items #5-A, and #5-B, have been deleted from the Council agenda as
Council no longer plans to have an August Special Election, but rather will try to have the election
in November. The consent agenda consists of the following:
5-C. Park Project and Community Matching Fund Request Policy.
5-D. Award of bid for copiers for City offices.
5-E. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Trammel Crow Companies for
paving repairs to Commerce Street.
5-F. Home Depot request for variance to the bufferyard requirements along SH 114 due to the
right-of-way acquisition by the Texas Department of Transportation.
S
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 3 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
5-G. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract for waterline improvements and the
construction of a six-inch sanitary sewer line from 200 North Kimball Avenue to
approximately 600 ft. west of Westwood Drive.
5-H. ZA 97-059, Plat Revision for Rucker's Hacienda De Gusto, for the proposed Lot 1, Block
1, Rucker's Hacienda De Gusto, being approximately 0.773 acres situated in the O.W.
Knight Survey. Owners: William and Zena Rucker. Applicants: Mike and Carol Rucker.
5-I. Resolution No. 97-41, Second extension to the moratorium on personal care facilities.
8-D. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 1st reading, Establishing regulations for personal care facilities.
8-E. Ordinance No. 483-G, 1st reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items).
10-A. Developer Agreement for Foxborough Addition, located on the north side of East
Southlake Boulevard, approximately 1,140' west of the intersection of East Southlake
Boulevard and North Carroll Avenue.
Motion was made to approve the consent agenda including: item #5-C, #5-E, #5-F, #5-G, #5-H,
S
#5-I (with the modification to show the moratorium extended for 45 days), #8-D, #8-E, #10-A,
(with the addition of the requirement that construction traffic not be allowed through the
residential area and also, further providing that the credit for the easement sought in the Developer
Agreement be reduced from $18,000 to $14,000).
Motion: Harris
Second: Martin
Mayor Rick Stacy read the captions of Ordinance No. 480-Y (#8-D) and Ordinance No.
483-G (#8-E).
Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Mayor Stacy abstained from item #5-E.
Councilmember Scott Martin thanked Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission for all the
hours spend on Ordinances No. 480-Y and 483-G.
Agenda Item #5-D, Award of Bid for Copiers for City Offices
Sam Yaple, President and Gary Stallings, District Manager, Keystone Information Management
Services, 8500 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 6077 Dallas, Texas. Both gentlemen were present from
• Keystone Information Management Services, stating the bid for copiers for City offices was not
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 4 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
to form. They alledged they met the requirements of the bid for far less money. It was
determined that Keystone does not service their accounts. Mr. Yaple stated they work in a mixed
service environment and that Emory-Buddy is the company who services the copiers for them.
They noted Emory-Buddy has been in business since 1942 and are well known in Tarrant and
Dallas counties.
Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, explained the reasons staff chose to go with
Lanier, adding, there were twelve bids with seven different vendors. She noted
we currently make 155,000 copies per month in the City of Southlake.
Motion was made to approve the bid for copiers as recommended by Lou Ann Heath, Director
of Finance.
Motion: Harris
Second: Martin
Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CONSENT ITEMS
S5-C. Project and Community Matching Fund Request Policy. The Park Board discussed a need
to develop a project policy to guide the Board and community groups in a standard process
for proposing and considering community projects in the parks. In March, SPDC set aside
$100,000 for matching funds for community-based projects in the parks. This combined
policy defines the matching funds as a dollar for dollar match.
5-D. There is an urgent need for additional copiers within the City. On May 13, 1997, bids
were received from seven vendors for copiers. The specifications requested three new
copiers, one for the Administration Building, an two for City Hall. The two existing
copiers at City Hall would be transferred to the Parks and Public Works buildings. The
specifications also called for the contracts on the existing copiers to be consolidated into
the pricing for the new units. The two lowest qualifying bids were submitted by Lanier
Worldwide, Inc. and Keystone Information Management Systems, Inc. The 1996-97
amount budgeted for copiers this year is $38,000. Two new copiers had been included in
the $38,000 budgeted amount because of the new Public Works building and the necessity
for an additional unit at the Administration building. An additional copier was added to
the bid so that an existing copyier could be transferred to the Parks and Recreation
Department. This would exceed the budgeted amount of$38,000 by approximately $950.
5-E. Contract with Trammel Crow Company for paving repairs to Commerce Street.
SCommerce Street located in Commerce Business Park was built in 1986. A section of the
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 5 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
street has "failed" as it has been raised by an apparent defect in the base or sub-base
material. Commerce Street with the current increased development in the Business Park
is carrying a significant increase in traffic. The contract with Trammel Crow Company
to have their contractor L.H. Lacey reconstruct approximately 444 square yards of
Commerce Street is for a total estimated cost of $21,312. The funds are budgeted in
Streets and Drainage Division (144), Object Code 781.00 which has been designated for
maintenance.
5-F. Home Depot request for variance to the bufferyard requirement along S.H. 114 due to the
right-of-way acquisition by the Texas Department of Transportation. Staff recommended,
that the variance be requested, due to the taking of the additional right-of-way for the
improvements to S.H. 114 and based upon TxDot allowing the required landscaping to be
placed in the S.H. 114 ROW, to reestablish a 25-foot landscape buffer along S.H.114, that
the variance be requested.
5-G. Contract for sanitary sewer improvements to construct a six-inch sanitary sewer line from
2171 East Southlake Boulevard to approximately 600 feet west of Westwood Drive. The
low bidder for this project is J.S. Constructors of Keller for $155,937. The bid consisted
of two units. Unit I is to establish a 6-inch sanitary sewer line. Unit II is to remove and
S
replace a section of the existing 12-inch water line to remove four 90 degree bends in the
water main. The 1997 Bonds included $160,000 for the sanitary sewer line.
5-H. Plat Revision for Lot 1, Block 1, Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto, 0.773 acres being a portion
of Tract 3 in Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 and a revision of Common
Green No. 36, Block 12, Timarron Addition-Brenwyck, Phase 2. Owners: William and
Zena Rucker. Applicants: Mike and Carol Rucker.
5-I. Resolution No. 97-41, Second extension to the moratorium on personal care facilities
(assisted living facilities). For a period of forty-five (45) days, effective upon expiration
of the original one hundred and twenty (120) day moratorium and the sixty (60) day
extension thereof, no application for a permit shall be accepted and no permit shall be
issued for any assisted care living center in the City of Southlake unless an applicati on for
the permit was received by the City prior to the passage of the original moratorium or
unless the assisted care living center received planned unit development zoning approval
from the City Council. The purpose of this moratorium is to maintain the status quo
within the City until such time as proper regulations have been adopted with regard to
assisted care living centers.
8-D. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 1st reading, Establishing regulations for personal care facilities.
S8-E. Ordinance No. 483-G, 1st reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items).
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 6 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
10-A. Developer Agreement for Foxborough, located on the north side of East Southlake
Boulevard, approximately 1,140" west of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and
North Carroll Avenue. Highlights of the agreement include:
• Off-Site and/or Sewer Pro-Rata: The proposed Developer Agreement pertains to the
easements on three lots in the addition. In exchange for the easement, the Developer is
requesting the following items: 1) the sanitary sewer installed in these easements benefits
the neighborhoods and therefore, the cost will be the City's responsibility; and, 2) the City
not construct any manholes on any residential lot in the addition; and, 3) the City reduce
the inspection fees as called for in paragraph I.G.I. a. by an amount of $15,000 which
equals the lost value of$5,000 per lot for "incumbering the affected lots with said utility
easements" his request has been added to Section 1.G.1.a. for better clarifications and,
4) the City will waive the Sewer Impact Fee of$1,000 per lot for the three lots impacted
by the easements.
• Off-Site Drainage: The Developer will intercept and put in a drainage pipe for
approximately two lots north of Ownby Lane to manage the drainage from the west lots
of Southview Addition. The construction will be placed in an existing drainage easement
along the Southview lots.
III ♦ Off-Site Water: Developer will install the required 12-inch water main along the addition
frontage on Southlake Boulevard. However, the commercial lot in the addition is
apparently owned by a third party, and the water main will not be extended across that
property unless the City request that it is to be completed and impose some type of pro-
rata on the commercial lot Developer to pay the cost upon commencing to build.
• Park Fee: The 46.77 acre addition has 63 residential lots. Per Subdivision Ordinance No.
483, Article VII (Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements), the Developer will be
required to pay $31,500 ($500/per lot). "In recognition of Developer setting aside
approximately 215,000 sq.ft. of the Foxborough Addition as public open space for
landscaping and recreation, the Developer agrees to pay fifty percent (50%) of the normal
Park Fee of$500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section
7.0". There are approximately 46.77 acres in Foxborough Addition which would bring
the net cost of Park Fee to $11,692.50. If the Park Board grants any credit then the
Developer will need to come back to the Council and amend this Developer Agreement.
Agenda Item #6, Public Forum
Kenneth Home, 1215 Ashmore Court, Southlake. Mr. Horne asked that the developers of
Timarron on Tract II have minimum house size on the tracts. The residents in the area do not
• want to see smaller houses. He asked Council to please keep that in mind.
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 7 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item #7-A, Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading, Granting a Cable Television Franchise
owned by Marcus Cable
Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 583 which grants a cable
television franchise currently owned by Marcus Cable Associates, L. P.; granting consent to the
assignment and transfer of a cable television system and franchise from Harron Cablevision of
Texas, Inc., to Marcus Cable Associates, L.P.; repealing Ordinance No. 321 which granted a
cable television franchise currently owned by Harron Cablevision of Texas, Inc.
Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager, made a presentation to Council with regard to this
transfer stating, the City is not renegotiating the existing franchise agreement with Marcus, but
simply seeking to amend the existing agreement.
PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were received during the public hearing.
Motion was made to approve the revised Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading as presented tonight.
Motion: Harris
Second: Fawks
Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance.
S
Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #7-B, Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading (ZA 97-047), Commerce Square
Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading (ZA 97-047), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce
Square, on property legally described as 7.22 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,
Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A. Current zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1"
Office District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and limited "I-1" Light Industrial uses.
Requested zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
District and limited "I-1" Light Industrial District uses. Applicant: Terry Wilkinson. Owner:
Southlake Properties, Inc.
Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that no further presentation will be made as
there have been no changes from the first reading.
Terry Wilkinson, 930 Normandy, Southlake, was present asking Council to approve as they did
on first reading.
PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing.
S
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 8 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading, as per the motion made during
the first reading on May 20, 1997 (see meeting minutes).
Motion: Martin
Second: Harris
Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat
Nays: None
Abstention: Stacy
Approved: 4-0 vote
Agenda Item #7-C, Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading (ZA 97-044)
Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading (ZA 97-044), Rezoning of approximately 4.00 acres situated
in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, being Tract 2C. Current zoning is "AG"
Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District.
Owners and Applicants: Jack and Barbara Rudduck. SPIN Neighborhood #10.
Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that there have been no changes since the first
reading.
S
Jack Rudduck, 217 Lilac Lane, Southlake. Mr. Rudduck stated he wants to rezone the property
to have his son build his own home on the property.
PUBLIC HEARING: No comments during the public hearing.
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading.
Motion: Fawks
Second: Martin
Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance.
Ayes: Fawks, Martin, Moffat, Harris, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #7-D, ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's
•
ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's being legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Village Center,
Phase I, and being approximately 0.816 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No.
1049. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Owner: T & M Southlake
Development Company. Applicant: Wendy's International, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #4.
Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that five (5) notices were sent to property
• owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) written response has been received from
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 9 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Southlake Land Ltd., Dennis Scifres, G.P., 301 Commerce #1205, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor.
Barry Hudson, 500 West 7th Street, Suite 600, Fort Worth. Mr. Hudson stated they have
complied with the Planning and Zoning Commission comments, noting, Greg Last, informed them
of the requirement for articulation, and it is their intention to meet that articulation. Mr. Hudson
noted this store differed from the Davis Boulevard location because they plan to use purified
walls. The store will seat eighty-eight (88), with thirty-seven (37) parking spaces planned. He
added, the ordinance calls for thirty-one (31) spaces.
Councilmember Martin questioned the two flood lights on the north side of the
building.
PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing.
Motion was made to approve ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's, pursuant to the Review
Summary Letter No. 2, dated May 30, 1997; deleting #3-B (south curb); stipulating that the
applicant has agreed to meet the articulation requirement; and that the applicant has agreed to do
a light study, and consider the existing light in the Village Center in order to meet the minimum
corporate standards.
SMotion: Martin
Second: Fawks
Ayes: Martin, Fawks, Harris, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #7-E, ZA 96-162, Concept Plan for Telesupport East Campus
ZA 96-162 Concept Plan for Telesupport East Campus, being legally described as Lot 25R1,
Block 1, Woodland Heights Addition, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1681, P.R.T.C.T. and
being approximately 2.070 acres. Current zoning is `C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District.
Owner: Roy C. Lee. Applicant: G. Phillip Morley. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, made a presentation stating seven (7) notices were sent to
property owners within the 200 foot notification area and one (1) response was received from
within the 200' notification area from Frank Ritz, 2101 East Southlake Boulevard, in favor. Two
(2) responses have been received from outside the notification area, from: Larry Marshall, 905
Parkview Lane, Southlake, in favor "as long as the elevation is complimentary to the buildings
adjoining to the east and west." Diane and Larry Faughn, 215 Eastwood, Southlake, opposed.
The applicant has met all the requirements in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated Januar y
S 3, 1997 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 16, 1997, with the exception of
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 10 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
those requirements in the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 30 1997.
Jim Monday, Chief Financial Officer for Telesupport. Mr. Monday stated they are waiting for
their engineering report for the third lane on Westwood (right turn off Westwood). Mr. Monday
stated the Planning and Zoning Commission asked for a driveway onto F.M. 1709. He is
concerned about delaying action as it has been nine (9) months so far that he has tried to complete
the requirements of the concept plan.
Mr. Monday asked to have this item tabled time certain the 3rd City Council
meeting in June.
PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing.
Motion was made to table ZA 96-162, time certain June 24, 1997, at the request of the applic ant,
continuing the public hearing.
Motion: Harris
Second: Fawks
Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Martin, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
0 Approved: 5-0 vote (to table)
Agenda Item #8-A, Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading ZA 97-035, Miron Addition
Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading (ZA 97-035), Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Miro n
Addition, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. And being
approximately 0.346 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park District, with a
requested zoning of "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Owner/Applicant: Martin W.
Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated five (5) notices were sent to property owners within
the 200' notification area and one (1) written response has been received from Smock & Huss eini
JV, M.M. Smock, 1529 Lambert Blvd., Oakland, California, undecided. Smock stated, "We do
not know what the ramifications would be to our adjacent property with this zoning." Staff
commented that the purpose for the rezoning of this strip of land is to avoid a split lot zoning
classification within the proposed Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition. This strip of land is the
remainder of Lot 3 located between the land purchased by the City and the R.O.W. quit claimed
to the owner of Lot 4. The City Zoning Administrator has waived the Concept Plan requirement
for this strip and has informed the owner that a revised Concept Plan for the entirety of Lot 4R
will be required prior to issuance of any building permit.
SMartin Schelling, 2665, North White Chapel Boulevard, Southlake. Mr. Schelling stated this
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 11 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
action is a "house keeping issue" to make the lot have the same zoning.
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading (ZA 97-035).
Motion: Fawks
Second: Moffat
Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance.
Ayes: Fawks, Moffat, Harris, Martin, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #8-B, ZA 97-036, Concept Plan for Lots 3R1-3R6, Block 1, Miron Addition
ZA 97-036, Concept Plan for Lots 3R1-3R6, Block 1, Miron Addition being legally described as
Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252,
P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 4.758 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park
District. Owner/Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
Martin Schelling, applicant, stated he has committed to the neighborhood behind his property that
he will put up an eight foot fence (eastern and southern). He stated he does not plan on a two
• story structure and that he will save all the trees that he can and still use his property.
Councilmember Martin asked if because he brought forward the
concept plan at this time, does he only have to comply with he
current ordinances.
Allen Taylor, City Attorney, responded to Mr. Martin by stating,
"Once they made application they must comply with those in place
at the time only."
Motion was made to approve ZA 97-036, pursuant to the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3,
dated May 30, 1997; following the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations.
Motion: Martin
Second: Harris
Ayes: Martin, Harris Fawks, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #8-C, ZA 97-037, Plat Revision Lots 3R1-3R7, and Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron
Addition
• ZA 97-037, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 3R1-3R7 and Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 12 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
being a revision to Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, Miron Addition, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide
1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 11.081 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business
Service Park District and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Owners: Martin W. Schelling,
Trustee (Lots 3R1-3R6 and Lot 4R, Block 1) and the City of Southlake (Lot 3R7, Block 1).
Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
Greg Last, Director of Community Development, commented in item #2 in the
review summary, there is a 15' utility easement that the Director of Public Works,
Bob Whitehead, wants the City to retain, to run the water transmission line to the
City lot. Mr. Whitehead stated we need a 30' easement (15' on the Gorbett
property and 15' on the Schelling property).
Motion was made to approve ZA 97-0Z7, Plat Revision, subject to the Plat Review Summary No.
3 dated May 30, 1997, accepting the recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on item#1; modifying the Planning and Zoning recommendation on item#2, to allow
the vacation of a 5' utility easement on the south side, but retaining the full 15' utility easement
on the west side.
Motion: Harris
Second: Martin
S
Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 5-0 vote
Agenda Item #8-E, Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132) Timarron Commercial
Tract III.
Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Timarron
Commercial, Tract III, being approximately 200.82 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey,
Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 1,1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan
Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D. Current
zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested
zoning is "NR-P-U-D" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business
Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-
2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "B-2"
Commercial Manufacturing District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not
exceeding 20.08 acres), from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family
District, "SF-30" Single Family District, and "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District.
Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #4 and #6.
SKaren Gandy, Zoning Administrator, made a presentation explaining the original request and the
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 13 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
amended request. A copy of the memorandum from Ms. Gandy, dated May 30, 1997 is hereby
attached to the minutes of the meeting, as well as the Timarron Commercial Tract III
Development Regulations.
Dennis Jerkey, Carter & Burgess. Mr. Jerkey explained the changes in the Development
Regulations for Tract II.
Mayor Pro Tem W. Ralph Evans arrived at 9:40 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Harold Knight, 1749 East Highland, Southlake. Mr. Knight stated he has twenty-five acres under
contract with the CISD and they have an option on the remainder of his property.
Jerry Lawrence, 1901 East Highland, Southlake. Mr. Lawrence stated he thinks the Planning and
Zoning Commission did a good job. He asked if the TIF does encompass all the property, how
will he, as an adjoining property owner with mixed use, relate with the TIF? He asked if what
will be approved tonight will also approve the TIF? He stated he wants to get all the cards on the
table.
• Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated there is no relationship between
the TIF and this property. The reason the City is looking at the
whole area when putting things together, is so the City will be able
to buffer, and so that the revenues from the TIF can be spent to do
things along the roadway and can be spent within the district. If
that area were not included, the money could not be spent in that
area. The larger area is drawn for no more reason than that. Mr.
Lawrence asked if this needs to be talked about now. Mr. Hawk
stated we don't know what properties will be included at this time
or the uses. We are taking the larger area so that the City can use
revenues that are derived from the commercial development in the
district to do all the things that need to be done and to protect the
property owners along Kimball, Highland and Carroll.
•
Dr. Charles Kennard, 1235 Stanhope Court, Southlake. Dr. Kennard referenced the citizen
survey. He stated he wants the preservation of a rural atmosphere and preservation of our schoo 1
system. He stated Southlake has achieved a reputation that we fight progress. He stated he would
like to see no commercial development on Highland. He does not feel we should allow hotels or
any commercial that would bring traffic near our schools.
S
Dale Crane, 1469 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Crane referenced his memorandum to the
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 14 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Council and delivered this afternoon. He referenced six other neighbors he is speaking for.
Debbie Guthrie, 1230 Stanhope Court, Southlake. Mr. Guthrie referenced the "Bubble A" and
moving the line back. It is the same hill Dr. Kennard is talking about. Ms. Guthrie stated the
residents want to be sure no "pad sites" are along S.H. 114.
•
Jeanne Cook, 1981 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Cook stated she has been to all the meetings
and is very interested. She referenced discussions held at Planning and Zoning meetings with
regard to property behind them.
Ms. Hardin, 1991 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Hardin stated they rezoned there property five
years ago as residential. She expressed concerns about what is going to happen next to her
property.
Dona Schroetke, 211 Eastwood Drive, Southlake. Ms. Schroetke referenced uses that were not
to be included on the 2,000 foot frontage along S.H. 114. She stated she feels the City Council
should revisit the areas shown as Special Use Permits, especially manufacturing.
Dr. Robert Bledsoe, 1600 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Bledsoe asked if the City is going to
• put a sports stadium on this property.
Mayor Stacy stated the City looked at "Tract C" for a bowl type stadium some
time ago. The City has to build a facility that will keep up with our growth. The
need exists, but we don't know where it will go.
Cindy Richardson, 1200 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Ms. Richardson stated she is concerned with
traffic on Highland. She fears when commercial comes in, it will make the traffic worse.
Mayor Stacy stated there will be no access off Highland. All traffic from the
commercial property will be from S.H. 114.
Maria Cameron, 1776 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Cameron expressed concern with parcel A
and the highest hill on Highland. She asked for a 500' setback. She stated she wants to see
natural plantings, using natural instead of new plantings.
Butch Dosburg, 1204 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Mr. Dosberg expressed concern with the water
run-off from the development. He commented on the tank on Highland in parcel A.
Laura Bellamy, 1202 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Ms. Bellamy had questions with regard to the 100'
set-back from residential to commercial.
S
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 15 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Jackie Lawrence, 1901 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Lawrence stated she is frustrated, she
thought we were talking about a hotel and now we are talking about a stadium.
Jim Haltom, 1700 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Haltom stated he likes Los Colinas and he likes
Solana and he wants to see this property develop just like them.
Public comments closed.
Dennis Jerkey, Carter & Burgess, stated he understands the concerns with the 300' set-back on
Highland. Jerkey stated they can live with the same wording as on Tract II. He understands
concerns with the hill on Highland. They would be willing to take the cross/hatched up at Parcel
A. They will go along with a 300' set back for Parcel C next to Parcel A for heavy commercial
uses and subject to the City Council review. He also agreed to 300' set-back on Parcel D north
end.
Councilmember Fawks stated he is concerned about the pad site on
S.H. 114 and is concerned with lining S.H. 114 with fast food
restaurants.
S
Steve Yetts, Timarron Land Development. Mr. Yetts stated he will take the comments concerning
pad sites and the lake under consideration and bring back to Council in two weeks. He noted
they are losing roughly twenty acres to right-of-way on the property.
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132), subject to the
June 3, 1997 submittal by the applicant; further incorporating the requirement that the northern
most portion of Tract A and D be modified to reflect a 300' no-build zone for any use other than
residential; the set-back can be modified by Council with special site plan approval; also, to
amend the ordinance to include the offer by the applicant to extend the red cross-hatched area also
known as the 300' set-back found on the requested concept plan to include the remaining part of
Tract C which is bounded by Parcel A's line and Parcel D's line on the north and west of the
cross-hatched area as shown on the concept plan.
Motion: Harris
Second: Evans
Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance.
Ayes: Harris, Evans, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 6-0 vote
Agenda Item #9-A, Resolution No. 97-42, Establishing an Economic Development Program
with Solana.
S
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 16 of 17
• UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated this item will not be discussed tonight, but will be brought
back at the next City Council meeting.
Agenda Item #11-A, Discussion: Schedule for June Retreat
Curtis Hawk presented the schedule for the June Retreat to be held on June 10 and 11, noting if
Council has an item to add, let him or the City Secretary know as soon as possible. He added the
packets for the retreat will be delivered to Council on Friday.
Councilmember Scott Martin suggested a discussion on Council's
goal status report would be helpful.
Agenda Item#11-B, Discussion: Calendar for Creation of a Tax Increment Financing District
The City Manager informed Council that a resolution will be placed on the June 24 Regular City
Council meeting which will set the process in motion. The preliminary plan will be complete by
June 27 with a final reading of the ordinance by August 26, 1997.
Agenda Item #12, Adjournment
SThe meeting was adjourned by Mayor Rick Stacy at 11:15 p.m.
Mayor Rick Stacy
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
d:\wp-files\cc\6\3\97\min\s1
0
Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 17 of 17
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING
June 9, 1997
MINUTES
Board Members Present: Larry Goldstein, Sherry Berman, Doug Fierce, Gary Beyer, Vicki Johnson,
Ronnie Kendall, Carol Lee Hamilton and Richard Anderson
Members Absent: Robin Jones
City Staff-Present: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation; Teddi R. Zonker, Administrative
Secretary; Kathy Schaeffer, Recreation Supervisor; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager;
Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent
The meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. by Chair Vicki Johnson.
Agenda Item_No. 2, Consider: Approval of Minutes for May 12, 1997 Regular Board Meeting -
Fierce asked for a review on wording on page 7 of 12 in regard to his KSB statement. Motion was
made to approve the minutes as amended for May 12, 1997
Motion: Goldstein
Second: Beyer
Ayes: Goldstein, Berman, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Anderson
Nays: None
Approved: 6-0
Youth Parks Board Enters chambers for Item No. 3
Agenda Item No. 3,Demonstration:Action Request Tracking System-Kevin Hugman, Community
Services Manager, provided a computer screen overhead demonstration of the Action Request
Tracking System to the Boards. Hugman described the system as being used to log and track
complaints as well as various community requestssuch as for information or services. The system
will also produce work orders from each action request, allow the work orders to be assigned, and
allow tracking of an action to closure.
In regard to Parks, Hugman explained uses may include complaints, various requests and work
orders.
Hugman explained that the system has been designed so that the first person that the citizen
communicates their concern to may enter the request/complaint to avoid transferring the call, etc.
Hugman stated that the system is also designed to allow the caller to be notified that the City is
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 1 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
taking action as well as inform the individual of when the situation is resolved.
Hugman stated that the system currently consists of 50 databases, with the largest being the citizen
database which has address and telephone number information. Hugman also stated that wherever
possible, only standard information may be entered into the system. For example, N White Chapel
must be entered in the same format each time to allow accuracy when performing the search
command. There are also comment fields for action requests and work orders so that additional
information and status chan be entered.
Hugman proceeded to enter a name to show how the information/database is organized. Within the
system there are several "drop down" menus such as types of requests. Hugman chose work order
and proceeded to show how one may enter a work order and assign the work order to a specific
employee with comments. Hugman also showed how the employee receiving the work order can
update the work order status within the notes section. This will help supervisors and receptionists
in tracking the status of a work order.
Hugman demonstrated how one may sort by a primary and secondary field to search for information.
Hugman explained that for the system to work well with each building (City Hall, Administration,
Public Works and Parks and Recreation) the City's computers must be networked, which will occur
within one (1) month. Hugman also stated that he is currently working with a consultant to obtain
the necessary software to make the system Internet accessible. In answering a Youth Parks Board
concern, Hugman stated internet accessibility must include security factors to avoid the public being
able to accss the City's computer network.
The Board took a break at 7:00 p.m.for SPDC to return from executive session.
The Board returns at 7:03 p.m.
Ronnie Kendall arrived at the meeting.
Agenda Item No. 4, Administrative Comments - For information purposes Ronnie Kendall asked
Kim Lenoir the reason for which the sidewalk ordinance was going to City Council Retreat this week
if no decisions have been finalized in regard to the ordinance. Shana Yelverton stated that the
Council will discuss issues regarding pavement management at the retreat since the City is reviewing
implementing a pavement management system and the City hopes to include sidewalks into the
system. Yelverton stated that the information was submitted as it was a request by the Public Works
Director in terms of a maintenance perspective, but the actual ordinance be approved by the Park
Board and then must go to P&Z for approval then to Council.
Lenoir introduced Ben R. Henry, as the new Park Planning and Construction Superintendent who
begins at the Parks and Recreation Department on Thursday, June 12, 1997.
Fierce confirmed with Lenoir that Al Morin has received a response in regard to the lights facing
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 2 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Diamond Circle Estates and Lenoir confirmed that Morin has been called by Randy Chambers
concerning status.
Johnson inquired about an update on the Park Dedication Ordinance and Lenoir stated that
Community Development is preparing further details which will be provided to the City Council
when City Council meets on Tuesday, June 17, 1997. Johnson stated that the Board should be
present at the meeting and be prepared to answer questions. Lenoir stated that she will make a
presentation on what the Board and P&Z recommended.
Johnson provided the Board with an update on the removal of the playground at Bicentennial Park
next to the Community Center and inquired about the Brunson property. Lenoir stated that they are
still waiting on the lawsuit which will take up to nine (9) months but confirmed that the property is
the City's and work may begin on the project.
Beyer inquired about the time table on tennis courts and Lenor informed the Board that SPDC
approved the MESA contract which will go to Council next Tuesday and MESA will then begin the
design work which will take up to three (3) months. Designs will then go directly to SPDC unless
there is a dramatic change from the master plan. Kendall stated that she will report and provide
updates on MESA's progress to the Board.
Johnson stated that every Monday, 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. is set aside for the Board members to talk
with Lenoir or Schaeffer about any questions,problems,etc. Beyer complimented the Park Staff and
Maintenance Crew in regard to the organization and setup of King and His Court. Johnson and
Beyer stated that the evening ran smooth considering the variety of programs occurring
simultaneously that evening and Beyer commented on the excellent media coverage and explained
how the event was a great asset to the City,Parks and Recreation and the Girl's Softball Association.
Agenda Item No. 5, Public Forum- Chair Vicki Johnson opened the public forum.
Joe Kendall, Box 92998, Southlake, stated that he would be referring to a budgetary item. Joe
Kendall has been an inline hockey coach for about one(1)year and is concerned about the condition
of the inline hockey court. Joe Kendall stated that the lighting and the surface of the court is fine,
but the boards have deteriorated so much that they are a safety issue as they do have sharp edges.
Hestated that no one has been injured but it must be a future concern. He understands that
Bicentennial Park Phase II will build a court but he does realize this is up to 18 months (three
seasons) away.
Joe Kendall stated that the sport is becoming more and more popular and that he will be doing more
publicity and is concerned that the court is not in compliance with ADA.
In regard to hard data, Joe Kendall stated that it is being researched by another coach and the cost
for new boards comes to nearly$25,000 total. Though the Bicentennial Park rink will be developed
in the future, Joe Kendall stated there is a true need for action as this time. Kendall stated that
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 3 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
fiberglass boards, specifically designed for the sport, may be necessary and would assist in the
avoidance of hard labor and lumber costs.
John Gagnon, 1005 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake, inline hockey coach, stated that his concern
is also from a safety perspective. Gagnon compared the court to Keller and stated that the boards
at Southlake do have cracks and loose or pertruding nails where the doors swing open and where the
kids go in and out of the box which can catch on the kids. Gagnon stated that the courts will
continue to be used as a practice facility even with Bicentennial Parks Phase II court. Gagnon also
stated that this court is the perfect size for the eight and under league games and he hopes that
upgrades to the court will be one of the Parks and Recreation Board budget priorities.
Michael Callfield, 1500 North Carroll, Southlake, inline hockey assistant coach, presented
photographs of the hockey court. Callfield stated that the facility does have a lot of potential as a
practice facility and a game court for the younger leagues removing the pressure from the new
Bicentennial Park Phase II facility. Callfield stated that there is tremendous damage on the court:
warped wood and cap rails as shown in the photographs, popping boards and seam and while the
surface is in fairly good shape the boxes are incredibly small and may be moved to the side where
the buses are fenced which would take pressure of the stand viewing. Callfield stated that the facility
has potential for a lot of use but it is in need of repair and needs to be maintained and he hopes that
the Board will consider this item and stressed the need for assistance.
Fierce inquired about the age range that is using the court and Callfield stated ages 6 to 18. Kendall
and Callfield stated that the present court is not within size regulation for all ages.
Callfield answered the questions of the Board by stating that roughly 210 boys participate in the
leagues and Kendall stated that seasons are in Sept./Oct. and April/May.
Johnson inquired about the time of when the court was constructed, Lenoir stated three(3)years ago
and stated that there is the potential to upgrade the court since the bus barn may be relocated.
Johnson stressed the damage which has occurred within the past few years and Lenoir agreed stating
that the general public as well as the hockey league use the facility.
Beyer confirmed with the coaches that the optimum court is concrete with fiberglass siding. Joe
Kendall stated that there are materials such as marine plywood that will withstand the elements and
will last much longer than 2 to 3 years.
Johnson requested hard numbers on this project for the next meeting since the Board is in the midst
of budget.
Tom Wilson, 100 Stonewood Court, Southlake, inline coach, stated his concerns are also safety and
that he has caught many players as they stumble out of the box due to the construction of the box
and the boards are a concern as they have removed splinters from the players hands. Wilson urged
the Board to consider the safety of the children. Wilson stated that the court is a tremendous asset
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 4 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
to the City that should be protected as other city courts upgrade their courts. Wilson also stated that
the rink will be of value even with Bicentennial Park Phase II rink since there are many times when
the leagues cannot obtain enough practice time due to other games on the court and the younger
players can use the court as their game court.
Berman inquired about the potential growth of the sport and Joe Kendall stated that their promotion
will increase this year due to postal patron mailings, etc.
The Board clarified that the facility will be used as a practice and a game court. Berman asked if
there will be a need for new courts and Joe Kendall stated that the new court will be primarily used
by the older participants and the old court will be a practice court and a game court for younger
participants.
Chair Vicki Johnson closed public forum at 7:36 p.m.
Hamilton arrived at the meeting.
Sara_Brenn. eitters_chamherwith_Youth Parks Board report - Sara Brennan, Youth Parks Board
reported that the Board decided on a motto and mascot from the nearly 25 community submissions.
The motto selected is: "Where fun is serious business" and the mascot selected is an all sport type
figure...the Sport Guy.
Brennan stated that the Board also discussed working on the web page to make it more creative.
Agenda Item No. 6,Consider: Eagle Scout Project to Build a Soccer Practice Field-Jeff Underwood
made a presentation to the Board in regard to his eagle scout project, a practice soccer field at his
church, St. Martins in the fields, located in Southlake on Pearson Lane.
Underwood stated his knowledge of the City needing eleven (11) soccer practice fields for next
season and stressed that his project would be one opportunity to build a field at minimum cost.
Underwood stated that his church does not want to maintain the field but if Southlake entered into
a contract of maintaining the field the City could use it Monday through Friday. Underwood's
second concern is building the field since there is a fence which will be moved and restrung and then
Underwood would set a mow date to review the growth at the field site.
The land is owned by the church, but Mr. Hill-Pipes presently grows alfalfa and coastal bermuda
grass which would act as a suitable soccer field surface.
Underwood's third concern is watering the field and he stated that he did apply for matching funds
of$200. Underwood stated that he feels the City and the church would benefit as there is a need for
practice fields.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 5 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Kendall inquired how the cost of water is determined. Underwood stated that the average water bill
last year was $200 per month.
Fierce confirmed with Underwood that watering would be done for two months (July/Aug) to get
the field established.
Anderson inquired about Mr. Hill-Pipes and Underwood stated that Mr. Hill-Pipes sold the land to
the church and the church allows him to grow the crops and Mr. Hill-Pipes has only asked for a week
notice in regard to construction so he may move his cattle from the area and he has no problem with
the church using the land as a practice soccer field.
Kendall confirmed with Underwood that he is supplying the labor.
Beyer inquired about the costs and Lenoir stated that the drainage looks good and that grading may
be completed inhouse. Lenoir also confirmed to Fierce that coastal bermuda would be good practice
field grass.
Johnson confirmed the location as north of Snows Gym.
Fierce and Lenoir discussed the watering capabilities and Lenoir confirmed that a City water reel
may be connected to the meter and it would work well.
Hamilton verified that the church does have a title to the property and Kendall inquired about injury
and insurance in regard to non-city owned property. Lenoir stated that the city attorneys would work
with the church attorneys.
Kendall verified adequate parking availability and Fierce confirmed that the field would not be
lighted.
Lenoir stated that she will meet with the church representative this Friday and the contract may be
signed off early or mid July and a letter of intend has been issued
Motion was made to approve the project and project matching fund requests of$200 ($100 per
month) which may come from SPDC matching funds.
Motion: Kendall
Second: Berman
Ayes: Goldstein, Berman, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Anderson
Nays: None
Approved: 8-0
Agenda Item No. 7, Consider: Procedureioraecreation Program Planning and Review - Lenoir
presented overheads in regard to philosophy of recreation and sports programs, stressing the
department's intent to continue with on-going programs and continue to improve the existing
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 6 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
programs as well as try new programs. Lenoir continued with Revenue Philosophy which includes
contract fee based-programs, where the contract instructor receives about 80% of the proceeds and
the fees cover the expenses (advertising, registration processing, etc.) city fee based programs,
special events(Holiday in the Park, Fourth of July, etc.) and youth sports associations where the city
does fund the maintenance and operations of the facilities. Southiake is one of few cities that do not
charge the associations as it is a City philosophy that the money is seen as from the citizens to the
associations for providing the youth programs.
Lenoir confirmed that any costs by the associations cover the associations direct costs (officials,
uniforms, etc.) and the money does not apply to maintenance.
Berman inquired if the contract and city fee based program costs are equal or not and Lenoir stated
that they are basically equal. Lenoir stated that costs are figured by comparing other cities and a
review of direct and indirect costs to determine a fee for each program.
Berman inquired about an 80/20 split and applying the 20 split to special events and Lenoir stated
that this could be an option to cover expenses for free programs. Lenoir stated however that as City
Manager Mr. Curtis Hawk believes that recreation is a city service and recreation program fees
should not necessarily support everything 100 percent.
Hamilton suggested that the youth sports not raise their fees any more by possibly cutting the costs
of the uniforms. Johnson stated that uniforms just do not last for more than one (1) season.
Lenoir stated that they are working on a contract for all the tournaments that the associations conduct
where the money made by tournaments is put toward the fields and facility which is good for the
City.
Goldstein stated that he does not have a problem with his tax money going toward maintaining the
fields for the community though the associations do dominate the fields.
Fierce stated that the financial burden not be on the users of the specific sports (associations).
Lenoir stated that we have expanded to three (3) seasons by splitting winter/spring to have three
seasons/brochures: Summer, Fall/Winter and Spring. Lenoir confirmed that the summer season is
the busiest and states the planning process by City staff and Park Board Recreation Liaisons for all
programs follows this schedule:
Summer programs, meet in March/April
Fall/Winter, meet in June/July
Spring, meet Oct./Nov.
Lenoir states the final process as evaluation where the staff reviews the evaluation cards,records the
responses on the post audit form and then the Park Board Recreation Liaisons review post audits as
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 7 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
follows:
Summer, meet in Oct./Nov.
Spring, meet in June/July
Fall/Winter, meet in March/April
Lenoir stated that programs are either dropped, revamped or improved depending on the evaluation
and the liaison comments.
Johnson stated that when the committee met, on several forms it had "instructor forgot to handout
card" so we did not receive the evaluation forms. So, the liaisons suggested for those for which we
are contracting with, since we are paying the contractor, they don't get their check until we receive
the evaluation cards because we must continue to evaluate our programs to evaluate how we are
doing as a department.
Lenoir stated that this procedure has been added to their contract.
Kendall asked who completes the post audit form and Lenoir stated Kathy Schaeffer. Johnson stated
that she completes it from information gathered from the cards. Lenoir stated that the data is
available to double check. Kendall states that is what she wants since she is an auditor, it bothers
her since the audit form reflects how Schaeffer is doing in her job. Kendall stated that if Schaeffer
is completing her own information, she is uncomfortable because it will reflect her management
ability since the audit reflects on the program and on Schaeffer. Kendall stated that there should be
some way to audit, possibly by a test sample or someone pulling data and checking the forms.
Kendall said she doesn't like to state these feelings but she feels that the wrong person is completing
the post audit forms. Kendall asked where are the numbers shown of how many people ask for
refunds, how many programs are cancelled. Lenoir stated that this could be available and it should
be tracked on the post audit forms. Kendall stated that someone should just look at the raw data that
is used to come up with the forms.
Hamilton agreed and Lenoir stated that there is no problem now since the staff is growing and
something can be done. In the past only Schaeffer or Lenoir were available to complete the forms.
Kendall stated that that would be great as it would be more efficient. Lenoir stated that cards are
postage paid and directed to Yelverton and she initials and sends them to Lenoir who initials and
then forwards to Schaeffer stating that everyone does see the data. Kendall stated that Schaeffer still
summarized the data. Kendall asked the percentage of individual completing the evaluation forms
and Lenoir stated 20-30 percent.
Lenoir refers to the procedure draft. Kendall inquired if Success Strategies is part of the procedure
and Lenoir stated it is. Kendall stated that she disagrees that the procedure of Success Strategies is
followed and states that she has documentation. Kendall reads 3 of 5 that participants are notified
of class changes and this information is documented in the class chart. Kendall stated that this is
wrong and she has heard that notification has never been provided to some participants in advance.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 8 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Johnson asked if that is a city or contract program and Kendall stated that it may have been park or
contract. Lenoir stated that sometimes the contractor is responsible for contacting participants and
that it may not have happened.
Lenoir stated that the Park and Recreation policy is to notify participants. Kendall stated that Robin
Jones attended a family program dressed up and a cancellation notice was posted on the door.
Schaeffer asked if Kendall was referring to the sweet heart dance and stated that there were eight
couples who signed up and the roster shows that a message was left or that someone was notified.
Schaeffer stated several showed and it was canceled since a minimum is required and some that
showed may have not been signed up yet, but the roster is updated in regard to notification.
Hamilton inquired about sending a preprinted post card to notify and Schaeffer stated the problem
as being that they try to get the minimum and will cancel the class up to the day before as a lot of
individuals sign up the day before or the day of the class.
Johnson and Hamilton suggested working on a cancellation procedure such as a cancellation up to
72 hours before the class if the minimum is not reached. Hamilton stated she believed it was
neccessary to call the individual and send a post card as answering machines are a problem and a
message to another person does not always reach the participant.
Kendall stated that procedures could be discussed all night and she does have a letter from a resident
who does not plan on participating with any park activities in the future and the letter lists up to six
(6) reason why and the resident can answer no to a lot of the questions on the procedure outline.
Kendall hoped that tonight would have been the Park Staff stating that room for improvement are
needed and the plan is to work on those improvements.
Lenoir stated that there is always room for improvement and does admit there have been a few
problems.
Johnson asked if the letter is in regard to contract or city programs and Kendall stated she did not
know if most of the programs are contract. Berman inquired if the letter is from Laura Miklosko and
Kendall confirm this.
Lenoir stated that if they are contact programs then the instructors have various responsibilities
depending on the individual contract. Berman stated that her children were in several of the classes
that Laura Miklosko was in and she did not agree with her letter and comments.
Hamilton stated that as new programs are organized and more contract instructors are introduced,
then problems will arise and that is why evaluation forms are provided to avoid using those
instructors in the future.
Lenoir stated that references are checked out and they are checked out with other cities and they are
interviewed. Kendall inquired about the percentage of instructors that approach the department and
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 9 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Schaeffer stated probably about 70 percent. Kendall stated that scares her due to items in the news
such as the Dallas YMCA. Lenoir stated that after the background check there have beenseveral
instructors that were turned away. Schaeffer stated that if the instructor does work with children then
a full background is completed. Kendall asked if there is always more than one(1) adult around and
Schaeffer stated that it depends and usually there is an 8:1 ratio and there is only one instructor.
Johnson inquired if the Board decided on only "two deep" programs. Hamilton stated they may
have, but she knows they did speak about it for the after school program. Beyer stated that he
thought it was for anything dealing with youth. Kendall stated that even at their church, one on one
must be within an open room with open doors where someone can watch the instructor and student.
Schaeffer stated that programs are either at the Community Center or at the schools. Hamilton stated
that at some point they spoke about developing a policy and Goldstein said it was discussed last year
in regard to not having only one adult with a group of kids and having two adults with a group of
kids does assist in eliminating problems.
Johnson and Beyer stated that two-deep must be imposed on certain programs. Kendall stated that
situations will happen if they are going to happen but if it is in a policy then it shows that precautions
were taken and there is less liability. Hamilton stated it may make it less likely to occur.
Lenoir inquired about day programs in the Community Center and Kendall stated if staff can see in
the room then two deep is not necessary in her opinion. Beyer stated that indoors, confined, closed
door programs are of utmost concern. Berman suggested The Lodge on a Saturday as an example.
Lenoir stated that if the class is more than 10 participants that there is usually two instructors.
Johnson stated that the contract programs do need continual process improvement. Hamilton stated
that ratios could be addressed in the policy of supervising children to read that for all children under
a certain age, certain steps be taken to ensure that the proper person is authorized to pick them up
and talk about ratio supervision, such as "two deep" instruction or a Parks and Recreation staff on
hand to patrol the class. Johnson stated that Robin Jones has a registration program than provides
a code to the child and the individual picking the child up must have the code. Johnson stated that
the Parks and Recreation Department is working toward refining procedures and this type of
program will assist tremendously.
Fierce stated that the quality should be the same regardless of a city or contract program because the
community assumes everything is Parks and Recreation. Hamilton stated that many will think of
the program as being provided by the City since rules, etc. are provided by the City; therefore,
schedule changes are the responsibility of the City.
Berman stated that on post audit cancellation and refund reasons should be listed and that children
are identified with some secure process when picked up from programs. Anderson verified creating
a cancellation policy and Lenoir agreed. Berman suggested a refund policy and providing an
evaluation form to the participant upon taking refund or have a separate card stating that we know
you were unhappy...Lenoir stated that the refund policy is 100% satisfaction guaranteed. Johnson
asked if Laura Miklosko had talked with Lenoir or Schaeffer and Schaeffer stated that she spoke with
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 10 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Miklosko and Miklosko only asked for partial refund. Johnson stated that if the customer is angry
just immediately provide a full refund.
Johnson inquired how class size is determined and is there anything that states a limitation on class
size. Schaeffer stated that the ratio is not accepted unless the instructor goes by Parks and Recreation
rules and ratios. Hamilton stated that staff should require a listing of names and numbers of those
assisting the instructor with the class and Berman agreed. Schaeffer stated that the contract currently
does not have that request.
Hamilton stated that the item should be tabled and Johnson suggests that the committee meet again
to review the details. The Board summarizes the changes as follows: supervision policy, ratios
defined, cancellation policy, oversight of post audit and items added to post audit.
Motion made to table the item and no action was taken.
Motion: Hamilton
Second: Beyer
Ayes: 8-0
Nay: None
Agenda Item No. 8, Consider: Procedure for the After-school Program - Lenoir stated that the staff
has been working to put this procedure together and answered Kendall in regard to the necessity for
the procedure that it is a state law requirement for afterschool programs.
Anderson stated that the program sounds like day care.
Lenoir stated that it is not day care and Johnson said it is not day care but it falls under the same
general"umbrella." Lenoir stated that the bill shows afterschool programs are unique from day care
programs, but it is modeled after day care regulations to ensure that such programs have adequate
standards.
Hamilton requested a change on the first page giving the responsibility to the Parks and Recreation
Director and not the Recreation Supervisor.
Lenoir stated that the changed can be made and Hamilton stated that she would feel more
comfortable if it were changed.
Hamilton inquired about the program manual which is referred to on 8-6, stating that each leader
should receive this manual and asked if the Recreation Specialist is certified in basic cardiac life
support. Johnson stated that they must be certified annually. Schaeffer stated that they must have
a current card in CPR and First Aid. Hamilton stressed the working of basic cardiac life support.
Schaeffer stated that the course is performed by the American Heart Association and is in
conjunction with Red Cross Standards which includes CPR and First Aid.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 11 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Hamilton stated that basic cardiac life support is good for two years and must remain current so the
wording should be changed to reflect basic cardiac life support.
Johnson inquired about the change following through on 8-6, E and 8-5, F and continues to stress
that the cards be current.
Beyer inquired about Hepatitis B tests and recommends the tests be required and the Hamilton and
the Board decline this recommendation.
Kendall inquires about the age of the children in the afterschool programs and Schaeffer states the
age range as 5 to 11.
Kendall stated that she believes this program is day care and regarding recreation program
philosophy, we should not be involved in"day care", but since the recreation liaisons agree on this
type of program so the procedure should be in place.
Goldstein stated that these types of programs were available when he was young and agrees with the
afterschool program. Kendall stated that we are just providing a service to working parents and
Lenoir stated that a large percentage of the parents do not work and the children prefer to stay after
school and participate in the program.
Schaeffer stated that up to 25 participants were present just because they like the program. Kendall
inquired about the general time that the participants go home and Schaeffer stated that most leave
at 4:00 p.m. or 5:00 p.m.
Kendall stated that she feels the program is day care and that is not something the department should
be involved in. Berman inquired about surveys and Lenoir stated that an audit form on the
afterschool program. Schaeffer stated that some of the cards are still being compiled.
Goldstein inquired about the types of activities provided and Schaeffer stated that arts and crafts,
cooperative games, special guests and homework time is available.
Goldstein said that it may be babysitting but it is nice to provide these recreation programs and that
actually the school should be providing this type of program.
Lenoir stated that Parks and Recreation began this type of program because there was a"third party
at Durham and as our joint use facility we decided to be at the site at 4:00 p.m. and continue through
the evening with programs and it solved a lot of joint use management problems and the program
worked.
Kendall said she feels the same about mom's day out and then asked what comes first, the need for
the children to be taken care of and then the activity. To her it is not the other way around, not the
recreation philosophy, but the needs of servicing the parents is coming first.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 12 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Hamilton stated that the afterschool care is something that is being provided to the child.
Kendall questioned how and Hamilton stated that this program is better than having the child stay
after school with no activities.
Kendall stated that this is only her opinion.
Berman stated that she would like to see some of the survey cards and see if background can be
obtained such as if the children parents is working or if the child is just interested in participating
in the programs since it is a great activity and the child would otherwise be bored at home.
Goldstein and Fierce agreed that it is a recreation program.
Johnson stated softball, baseball, etc. could be viewed a day care too; any program can be used as
day care by some parents.
Kendall stated that we do need the procedure if we are having these programs and Fierce agreed that
we do need procedures and safety certification for all who supervise children. Fierce stated that a
mixed message may be sent as this procedure states at 10:1 ratio and other programs are 8:1.
Hamilton stated that the difference between instructional and recreation could explain the ratios.
Johnson asks the Board if the ratio should be 10:1 and the Board agreed. The ratio statement was
changed to read an average maximum ratio of 10:1.
Motion was made to accept the procedure as amended.
Motion: Goldstein
Second: Beyer
Nays: None
Ayes: 8-0
Agenda Item No. 11 is moved up within the agenda
Agenda Item No. 11, Discuss: Donations - Southlake Historical Commission - Aloha Payne was
present to speak about the Fechtel House. Johnson stated that the cost figure to move the house and
place on foundation at Bob Jones is $20,100.
Payne stated that the house was built in 1919 and is worth saving the structure as one of the oldest
structures. Payne stated that we have until August to make a move with the house. Beyer inquired
about the house being structurally sound and Payne stated that the second story may not be
completely stable, but she isn't sure as she is not qualified to assess the structure.
Johnson stated that the Board has still not decided if the structure will exist as the nature center or
not.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 13 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Anderson verified that the structure must be moved by August and stated that there is still vandalism
concerns if the structure is moved to Bob Jones in August.
Johnson asked where the $20,100 will come from and assumed that the entire project will cost
$100,000 and Payne stated that they will be planning a fund raiser soon and Johnson said that the
same problem,where to store,will arise and Johnson verified the Fechtel House as 1,500 square feet.
Goldstein stated the problem of where to place the Fechtel house. Berman stated that the Board does
not want to lose the house and Goldstein inquired about the state having a funding program to move
the structure.
Johnson stated that she is sure there is money but the one concern is where to store the structure.
Berman confirmed the date of August due to Town Center and City Hall development. Fierce
confirmed that development will soon begin even though TIF may not be in effect.
Kendall stated that the Fechtel House location at Bob Jones has not been decided, but if it will be
used as a nature center then the nature center committee must be informed. Kendall stated that a
location decision must be reached.
Lenoir recommended the five acre Noble Oaks at Continental and the new Carroll and the Board
discussed that this location will be a more safe location in regards to vandalism.
Hamilton stated that she will join Goldstein in working on saving this house and the Board agreed
they must try to work toward this project.
Goldstein stated that the plan should not be rushed and Payne stated that the Fechtel House should
be restored for the era and Fechtel should be used with heritage park with the cabin and barn that is
available in order to keep the historical value and historical appearance. Payne stressed that she did
not want the Fechtel House to go to another city and Anderson stated that Bob Jones could be a
problem.
Kendall and Hamilton agreed that they would go to the site and survey and work on their decision.
Goldstein stated that the nature center is something the Board does want to do and the Board should
decide an appropriate location for the house and someone should provide hard data on property and
time frame of construction. Goldstein and Hamilton agreed to work on this item.
Agenda Item No 9_,Liais_on_Reports -
Youth Parks & Recreation Board-Johnson-no report.
Budget-Fierce-no report.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 14 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Recreation/Special Events-Johnson, Beyer, ..gsze - no further report.
Community Relations-Berman, Kendall-Berman had no report and Kendall asked Anderson if he
would like to be the liaison for Bob Jones. No appointment was made.
Youth Sports Associations-Beyer-Beyer stated that he met with Schaeffer and Lenoir regarding the
budget requests for soccer for wanting 11 practice fields. Beyer stated that he did receive the reports
from Girl's Softball and Boy's Baseball. Beyer stated that the youger sports participants are the ones
that are growing.
Community Groups-Hamilton, Goldstein-Hamilton stated that she will be working with the
Historical Society and recently she has assisted KSB with the wildscape cleanup. Hamilton stated
that KSB is doing their annual hunt for Directors and she encouraged KSB membership.
Johnson inquired if KSB is still searching for funding because Casino Night is looking for a recipiant
for their funds. Hamilton stated that she will inform Lisa Stokdyk.
SPIN-Fierce-Fierce stated that the last meeting was a joint City Council/SPIN meeting and both
sides expressed concern for extended communication with some of the other Boards just as the Park
Board encouraged recently. Fierce stated that he suggested David Baltimore as the Board looked
at the Park Dedication Ordinance. Fierce encouraged open communication and suggested a joint
meeting of Park Board and SPIN.
Lenoir stated that she did speak with Nona Whitehead and Whitehead stated that the Executive
Committe does want to pursue this joint meeting.
SPDC-Kendall-Kendall stated that tonight they heard from Eddie Cheatham and Associations and
his budget was approved by SPDC with one exception being the parking lot budget. Kendall stated
that Cheatham will move forward and hold on the parking which was budgeted at $435,000 for 526
spaces including everything such as lighting. Kendall showed the drawing which has alloted 14
fields versus the 11 in the master plan. Kendall confirmed that this plan will be going to
Grapevine/Southlake Soccer Association for review and that the total for Phase I Bob Jones is $1.5
million which includes all 14 fields, the pond and irrigation. The soil from the pond will be used
for berms and to build up the fields.
Lenoir stated that construction will begin within a couple of weeks and bids will be awarded in mid
July.
JUC-Hamilton-Hamilton stated that there has been no meeting since she has been assigned, but
there is a meeting Tuesday,June 10, 1997 with the City Council and CISD school board trustees and
issues will include joint use. Hamilton stated that the meeting will include discussion on the TIF and
possibly on the stadium.
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 15 of 16
**UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD**
Hamilton stated that she would like to obtain more feeling from the community in regard to TIF and
a stadium and Lenoir stated that joint use received 92% satisfaction on the citizen satisfaction
survey.
The Board stated the stadium should be of use for the Parks and Recreation Department and there
are many benfits due to various programs which could occur at this location.
Agendaitem No. 10, Discuss: Budget 1997-98 - Johnson stated since the hockey coaches came
forward during public forum, the hockey court should seriously be considered as a priority item.
Johnson review the highest priority items which where further prioritized as follows:
1. More soccer practice fields (6)
2. One ton pickup, trailer and gang mower for Bob Jones
3. Carrol Intermediate School Hockey Rink Construction
4. Registration software
5. New lights for field#1
6. New safety net on field #2
7. Fencing for Adventure Alley
8. Construct park entrance (street) improvements off North White Chapel
9. 24 passenger van
10. Joint-use equipment budget
11. Resod field #2
12. New lights for field#3
The Ranger Program was discussed as a budgetary item and the Board agrees that it is a program
which should be in effect but at a later date.
Lenoir stated that the priority list goes to the City Manager on June 17,1997 and then the Finance
Department reviews requests and the City Manager reviews with each department once again laterin
July.
Beyer left the Board meeting at 10:10 p.m.
• _enda Item No,12,Discuss:Joint Meeting with SPIN Standing Committee-July 24-Johnson stated
that this meeting will be placed on the calendar.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:15p.m.
Vicki Johnson, Chair
Gary Beyer, Secretary
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 16 of 16
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION
IIIREGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING
June 5, 1997
1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice-Chairman James Murphy; Commissioners
2 Ann Creighton, Rob Jones, and Lanny Tate
3
4 COMMISSION ABSENT: Debra Edmondson and F. C. LeVrier
5
6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Debra Drayovitch, Staff Engineer Angela Turner,Planner
7 Chris Carpenter, Planner Dennis Killough, and Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell
8
9 The meeting was called to order Chairman Wright at 7:11 p.m.
10
11 AGENDA ITEM #2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
12 Chairman Wright opened discussion of the minutes of the May 15, 1997, Regular Planning and
13 Zoning Commission continuation meeting and the May 22, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning
14 Commission meeting.
15
16 Motion was made to approve the May 15, 1997, and the May 22, 1997, Planning and Zoning
9ICommission meeting minutes, as amended in work session.
Motion: Murphy
20 Second: Tate
21 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
22 Nays: None
23 Approved: 5-0
24 Motion carried.
25
26 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#49)
27
28 AGENDA ITEM#3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS:
29 There were no comments from the City staff or the Commission.
30
31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#54)
32
33 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 97-023. SITE PLAN OF CHEVRON, LOT 1, BLOCK 1. VILLAGE
34 CENTER:
35 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of Chevron on
36 property described as Lot 1, Block 1,Village Center, and being approximately 0.934 acres situated
37 in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The property is located on the northeast corner
loiof the intersection of Village Center Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current
zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor
Recommendation is Village Center. The applicant is Chevron Products Company. The owner is T
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 1 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION
0 & M Southlake Development. Six(6)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'
notification area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor.
3
4 Don Walker (Chevron Products Company), Atlanta, Georgia, presented this item to the
5 Commission. Mr. Walker stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Review Comments.
6
7 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked Mr. Walker if he intends to comply with Item#11 which stipulates
8 a minimum 75'throat depth, and Mr. Walker stated that they are revising the site plan to show a 75'
9 throat depth as required.
10
11 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
12
13 Patty Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, asked the Commission to deny this request.
14 She stated that Mr. Don Silverman promised her neighborhood he would never place a gas station
15 in Village Center if they supported the shopping center. She said that this is a dangerous location
16 for a gas station. She stated that there has been a breach of trust by Mr. Silverman.
17
18 Mr. Walker stated that Chevron was not aware of any other agreements when they entered into an
19 agreement to purchase this property. He feels like this is a good location for a gas station and feels
20 it will serve Southlake well.
0 Donald Silverman (T & M Southlake Development Company) 1593E Bent Tree Forest Circle,
Dallas, Texas, stated that when he first spoke to Kroger and to the residents of Woodland Heights
24 about placing a gas station in Village Center, he told them he did not foresee it happening. He
25 recently asked Kroger how they felt about having a corporate-owned Chevron gas station in Village
26 Center, and they (Kroger) saw it more as an amenity than a disadvantage.
27
28 Commissioner Tate asked Mr. Silverman to clarify whether or not he told the residents of Woodland
29 Heights that a gas station would not be put in Village Center. Mr. Silverman stated that he does not
30 recall what his exact words to the residents were.
31
32 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Silverman if he requested the neighborhood's support by
33 suggesting to them that he had no intention of placing a gas station in Village Center. Mr. Silverman
34 stated that he does not recall gas stations, specifically, being a focus of discussion.
35
36 Dennis Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that he met with Mr. Silverman and
37 Sandy Avery in his own living room and recalls being told by Mr. Silverman that there would be no
38 gas stations. Mr. Minder stated that there has been a breach of trust by Mr. Silverman.
39
40 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
41
42 Chairman Wright announced that the Commission would go into Executive Session to seek the
4111 advice of the City Attorney.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 2 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION
0 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#645)
3 Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting and asked the City Attorney if any action was necessary
4 as a result of the Executive Session. Debra Drayovitch stated that no action was necessary.
5
6 Commissioner Creighton stated that since there are so many review comments and since the current
7 site plan has been revised, she is concerned that the Commission is not in a position to properly
8 examine the site plan to see if it complies with the City's ordinances.
9
10 Motion was made to table ZA97-023 to the July 3, 1997,Regular Planning and Zoning Commission
11 meeting.
12
13 Motion: Creighton
14 Second: Murphy
15 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
16 Nays: None
17 Approved: 5-0
18 Motion carried.
19
20 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#800)
6 Chairman Wright suggested,since there seemed to be a major misunderstanding, that Mr. Silverman
meet with the Woodland Heights residents again to discuss the Chevron case.
24
25 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA 97-024, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED
26 BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION), LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VILLAGE CENTER:
27 Motion was made to table ZA97-024 and to continue the Public Hearing, to the July 3, 1997,
28 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
29
30 Motion: Murphy
31 Second: Creighton
32 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
33 Nays: None
34 Approved: 5-0
35 Motion carried.
36
37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#844)
38
39 AGENDA ITEM #6, 97-053. REVISED SITE PLAN FOR CHRISTIAN MEN'S NETWORK:
40 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Revised Site Plan for
41 Christian Men's Network on property legally described as Lot 2R1,Block B, Ravenaux Village, an
42 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet
• A, Slide 2120, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.97 acres situated in
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 3 of 13
•
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
• the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. The property is located on the south side of Ravenaux
2 Drive approximately 500'west of the intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Blvd.
3 The current zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District
4 uses. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The owner and applicant is Christian Men's Network.
5 Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one
6 response has been received which was in favor.
7
8 The applicant was not present for this item.
9
10 John Levitt (J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, stated that
11 he is the engineer working on the extension of Countryside Drive.
12
13 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
14
15 Rita Tavera, 200 W. Highland, Southlake, Texas, asked the Commission to approve this request
16 because she does not want the fence. She stated that it looks much nicer with the trees instead of a
17 fence.
18
19 John Larsen, 335 Ravenaux, Southlake, Texas, stated that he is in favor of eliminating the fence,
20 also. He stated that this applicant is not doing a very well at being a "good neighbor." Mr. Larsen
210 stated that the applicant did not screen the mechanical equipment on his roof. Mr. Larsen also stated
that the applicant is not keeping his grass mowed, which is a fire hazard.
24 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
25
26 Motion was made to approve ZA97-053, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.1, dated May
27 30, 1997.
28
29 Motion: Murphy
30 Second: Jones
31
32 Commissioner Tate asked what would happen in the future if the surrounding home owners decided
33 they wanted a fence there. Chairman Wright stated that if the Commission approves this request,
34 the applicant is finished; he will not be required in the future to erect a fence.
35
36 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
37 Nays: None
38 Approved: 5-0
39 Motion carried.
40
41 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#1307)
42
• AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA 97-054. SITE PLAN FOR GEORGETOWN PARK, PHASE II:
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 4 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
00 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Revised Site Plan for
Georgetown Park, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an
3 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet
4 A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.058 acres situated
5 in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. The property is located on the south side of East
6 Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 700' east of the intersection of South Kimball
7 Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
8 District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Retail
9 Commercial. The applicant is Realty Capital Corporation. The owner is Georgetown Monticello
10 Partners,Ltd. Fourteen(14)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification
11 area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor.
12
13 Richard Myers (Realty Capital Corporation) 2425 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 150, Southlake,
14 Texas, presented this request to the Commission. He stated that he has no problems with any of the
15 staff comments and intends to place a fence as shown on his site plan.
16
17 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
18
19 Howard Carr stated that he is in favor of this request but would like it to be known that he does want
20 a fence up. He has donkeys and is very worried about a child being injured by one of them. Mr.02Carr stated that he feels the builder has done a nice job on this project.
Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
24
25 Motion was made to approve ZA97-054, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May
26 30, 1997.
27
28 Motion: Murphy
29 Second: Tate
30
31 Commissioner Creighton asked if the applicant is asking for a variance to the articulation
32 requirements. Mr. Myers stated that he likes the way his building looks and would like to leave it
33 as shown.
34
35 An amended motion was made to approve ZA97-054, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.
36 1, dated May 30, 1997, accepting the articulation as shown on the site plan.
37
38 Motion: Murphy
39 Second: Creighton
40 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
41 Nays: None
42 Approved: 5-0
0 Motion carried.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 5 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION
qi, (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#1553)
3 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA 97-055, REZONING:
4 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Zoning Change on
5 property legally described as approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,
6 Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. The property is located at approximately 200' east of
7 the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested
8 zoning is "0-1" Office District. The Land Use Category is Industrial. The owner and applicant is
9 Ken Smith. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area,
10 and no responses have been received.
11
12 John Levitt(J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, presented this
13 item to the Commission.
14
15 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
16
17 Lowell Morrison, 710 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that he did not receive a notice
18 for this application, and he lives within 1' of this property. He stated that he thinks there has been
19 a mistake. Mr. Morrison stated that he understands that the bufferyard requirements will be reduced
20 since the applicant has reduced his zoning request from "S-P-2" with "I-1" uses to "0-1." He stated
ithat he is opposed to this request because he just does not know enough about what the applicant is
trying to do.
24 Bobby Struempler, 700 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that he did not receive a notice
25 for this application, but he did receive a notice for the preliminary plat on the entire property. Mr.
26 Struempler stated that he is opposed to this request because there is not enough bufferyard and
27 building setback.
28
29 Pam Morrison, 710 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that she would like to see a wider
30 bufferyard and a brick fence.
31
32 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
33
34 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked Mr. Levitt if he would be willing to provide a better fence and a wider
35 bufferyard.
36
37 Mr. Levitt agreed to provide a 15'bufferyard instead of a 10'bufferyard. He did not agree to upgrade
38 the fence from an 8' wood fence to a brick fence.
39
40 Commissioner Tate stated that an 8' wood fence is not going to look good over time; it will not stay
41 straight. He questioned whether or not the residential property owners might instead want a 6'wood
42 fence with plantings to equal the 8' of required screening.
S
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 6 of 13
•
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION
• Chairman Wright stated that he does not think the applicant can place that many plantings due to the
2 number of existing trees.
3
4 Commissioner Jones asked why the applicant changed his zoning request to "0-1" if the surrounding
5 residents want "S-P-2" with "I-1" uses. Mr. Morrison stated that most of the residents were happy
6 with previous request of"S-P-2" with "I-1" uses, but some of the Commission was not.
7
8 Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:49 p.m.
9 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 8:56 p.m.
10
11 Chairman Wright stated that he discussed with the applicant the possibility of placing a masonry
12 fence on the west property line; the applicant indicated that due to the length of the west side
13 (approximately 1,250'), he cannot commit to a masonry fence due to the costs involved.
14
15 Motion was made to approve ZA97-055, adding a 20' bufferyard along the west property line
16 adjacent to residential.
17
18 Motion: Murphy
19 Second: Tate
20 02Mr. Levitt agreed to a 20' bufferyard along the west property line.
Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
24 Nays: None
25 Approved: 5-0
26 Motion carried.
27
28 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#2562)
29
30 Community Development Director Greg Last stated that it is apparent that the property owner
31 notifications for Agenda Item#8, ZA97-055, were sent to the wrong people. He recommended that
32 City staff renotify for Case#ZA97-055 on June 6, 1997. He stated that since everyone involved in
33 the previous discussion is still present in this meeting, the Commission can reconsider that case,
34 rescind their motion and table it to the next meeting. Mr. Last apologized for the confusion and the
35 error.
36
37 Motion was made to reconsider ZA97-055.
38
39 Motion: Murphy
40 Second: Creighton
41 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
42 Nays: None
1110 Approved: 5-0
Motion carried.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 7 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION
1110 Motion was made to rescind the action taken on ZA97-055.
3 Motion: Murphy
4 Second: Creighton
5 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
6 Nays: None
7 Approved: 5-0
8 Motion carried.
9
10 Motion was made to table ZA97-055 and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 19, 1997,
11 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, due to a failure to properly notify adjacent
12 property owners within 200'.
13
14 Motion: Murphy
15 Second: Creighton
16 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
17 Nays: None
18 Approved: 5-0
19 Motion carried.
20 42AGENDA ITEM#9,ZA 97-067,PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONECREST BUSINESS PARK:
Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for
Stonecrest Business Park, being legally described as approximately 43.69 acres situated in the
24 Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being Tracts 5, 5A, 11 A, and 11 B. This plat proposes
25 twenty-two (22) lots. The property is located on the east side of Crooked Lane and approximately
26 560' south of the intersection East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane. The
27 current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, "I-1" Light Industrial District, and "0-1" Office
28 District. The Land Use Category is Industrial. The owners and applicants are Ken and Darla Smith.
29 Nineteen (19) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and
30 four (1) responses have been received with one (1) in favor and three (3) opposed.
31
32 John Levitt(J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, presented this
33 item to the Commission. He stated that due to the situation with the previous case, he understands
34 that this case will need to be tabled,too. He wanted the Commission to know that he has a meeting
35 on Monday, June 9, 1997, with the Grapevine Public Works Director regarding Option B which
36 shows the south connection into Heritage Industrial Park. If that option does not work out, he asked
37 that the Commission approve his original request which is Option A.
38
39 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing.
40
41 Mr. Levitt asked that this case also be tabled until June 19, 1997.
42
S
Chairman Wright stated that he is in favor of the Option B request which shows the south connection
into Heritage Industrial Park.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 8 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION
410 Motion was made to table ZA97-067 and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 19, 1997,
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
3
4 Motion: Jones
5 Second: Creighton
6 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
7 Nays: None
8 Approved: 5-0
9 Motion carried.
10
11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3473)
12
13 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided over Agenda Items #10 and
14 #11.
15
16 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA 97-056, DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF TIMARRON ADDITION,
17 VILLAGE J:
18 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Development Plan of
19 Timarron Addition, Village J on property legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated
20 in the Hall Medlin Survey,Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract
21 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2,Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract
S
3A3B. The property is located at approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive
and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. The
24 current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The Land Use Category
25 is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P. Six (6)
26 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have
27 been received.
28
29 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this
30 item to the Commission. Mr. Janssen stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff
31 Comments.
32
33 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to
34 speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing.
35
36 Motion was made to approve ZA97-056, subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1,
37 dated May 30, 1997.
38
39 Motion: Tate
40 Second: Creighton
41 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton
42 Nays: None
S
Abstain: Wright
Approved: 4-0-1
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 9 of 13
•
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
1110 Motion carried.
3 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3626)
4
5 AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA 97-057, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TIMARRON ADDITION,
6 VILLAGE J:
7 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for
8 Timarron Addition- Village J,being legally described as approximately 56.817 acres situated in the
9 Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2,
10 a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract
11 3A3B. This plat proposes eighty-four (84) residential lots and seven (7) common greens. The
12 property is located at approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East
13 Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. The current
14 zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The Land Use Category is
15 Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P. Six (6)
16 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses
17 have been received.
18
19 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this
20 item to the Commission. Mr. Janssen asked for an exception to Staff Comment#7B regarding the
21 cul-de-sac length on Street B.
11111 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened thepublic hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to
rP y P g
24 speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing.
25
26 Motion was made to approve ZA97-057, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30,
27 1997, deleting Item#7B subject to the fire department approval.
28
29 Motion: Creighton
30 Second: Tate
31 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton
32 Nays: None
33 Abstain: Wright
34 Approved: 4-0-1
35 Motion carried.
36
37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3929)
38
39 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
40
41 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA97-058, SITE PLAN OF SOUTHLAKE OAKS. PHASE II:
42 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of Southlake
SOaks, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an
addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 10 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
0 A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 1.8685 acres situated
in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. The property is located on the north side of
3 West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410'east of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and
4 West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
5 District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is 1709
6 Southlake Oaks, Ltd. Seven (7) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'
7 notification area, and no responses have been received.
8
9 Neil Kukerbaum, 16800 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. He
10 asked for a variance to Items #1 a (minimum driveway spacing), #1 b (minimum throat depth) #2
11 (parking spaces on the west side of the building),#9 (40' rear setback line) and#14 (loading space).
12
13 Commissioner Creighton asked who his potential users are. Mr. Kukerbaum stated that in Phase I
14 he has Henry S. Miller Realtors, First American Title Company, Metro Cleaners, First Eyecare and
15 a nail salon. He stated in Phase II, he has a Letter of Intent by a restaurant named Bailey's.
16
17 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak.
18 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing.
19
20 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked City staff how to properly accommodate Item #2 (parking spaces on
Ailh21 west side of building). Planner Dennis Killough stated that it could be accommodated by filing an
Mramendedplat or by requesting a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Mr. Killough stated
that the easier avenue would be filing the amended plat.
24
25 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked how the Commission should accommodate Item#14 (loading space).
26 Mr. Killough stated that the applicant would need to meet the ordinance or go to the Zoning Board
27 of Adjustment.
28
29 Motion was made to approve ZA97-058, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May
30 30, 1997, deleting Items #la (minimum driveway spacing) and #lb (minimum throat depth);
31 modifying Item#9(40'rear setback line)to reflect the site plan as shown;and stating that the eastern
32 most building site is not included in this motion or in this case and will require a revised site plan
33 for approval.
34
35 Motion: Murphy
36 Second: Tate
37 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
38 Nays: None
39 Approved: 5-0
40 Motion carried.
41
42 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#4940)
1110 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided over Agenda Item#13.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 11 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
III
2 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 97-063, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 14R
3 THROUGH 21R, AND LOT 22 (COMMON GREEN 58), BLOCK 55, TIMARRON ADDITION,
4 BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE:
5 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Plat Revision for the
6 proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22 (Common Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition,
7 Bryson Square, Phase One, being a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition,
8 Bryson Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according
9 to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being
10 approximately 2.880 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. The
11 property is located on the south side of Saxon Trail at the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon
12 Trail. The current zoning is "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. The Land Use
13 Category is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P.
14 Thirteen(13) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one
15 response was received which was in favor.
16
17 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this
18 item to the Commission. He stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Comments.
19
20 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to
21 1speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing.
10 2 Motion was made to approve ZA97-063, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30,
24 1997.
25
26 Motion: Creighton
27 Second: Jones
28 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton
29 Nays: None
30 Abstain: Wright
31 Approved: 4-0-1
32 Motion carried.
33
34 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#5110)
35
36 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
37
38 AGENDA ITEM #14, MEETING ADJOURNMENT:
39 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:04 p.m. on June 5, 1997.
40
41 Motion: Tate
42 Second: Murphy
0 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton
Nays: None
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 12 of 13
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION
4i Approved: 5-0
Motion carried.
3
4 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#5135)
5
6
7
8
18
11 Joe Wright
12 Chairman
13
14
15 ATTEST:
16
17
20 Lori A. Farwell
21 Community Development Secretary
•
•
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 13 of 13
I
•
SOUTHLAKE YOUTH ACTION COMMISSION (SYAC)
1996-1997 Annual Report to the City Council
The Southlake Youth Action Commission was created in 1994 to generate broad-based public
awareness and support for youth. This group was formed to act as the formal "voice of
youth" in Southlake to bring issues to the City Council. SYAC also serves as a vehicle to
familiarize the youth of Southlake with the governance process in Local Government. This
year, there were 27 SYAC members ranging from 7th to 12th grades. This annual report
outlines Southlake Youth Action Commission's accomplishments during this past year.
Accomplishments:
• Ropes Course - The Southlake Youth Action Commission started the year by participating
in a ropes course in September. The purpose of the ropes course was to provide mentally
and physically challenging experiences to develop trust, personal growth, creativity,
communication, and self-esteem building. This was a great way to start the year by
encouraging team work and leadership skills.
S
• Habitat for Humanity Project - SYAC participated in a Habitat for Humanity project in the
fall. This project allowed the SYAC members to volunteer in the community by building a
home. SYAC also prepared a basket of food for the family living in the home.
• Southlake's 40th Birthday Celebration - The Southlake Youth Action Commission assisted
with the city's 40th birthday celebration. In September, SYAC volunteered at the 40th
Birthday Celebration for the City of Southlake. In May, SYAC members volunteered at
the Fair & Kite Festival by assisting with the games and activities during the celebration.
• Christmas for Kids Project - SYAC members assisted with the city's Christmas for Kids
Project by helping at the outdoor Christmas Carnival. The Christmas for Kids Project
provides food and clothing for needy families in the community. Volunteering with this
project gave SYAC the opportunity to help the community during the holiday season.
• Volunteer in Community Projects - Over the year, the Southlake Youth Action
Commission volunteered in various community projects. SYAC participated in the Texas
Trash-Off, the Senior Citizen's Dance, the Easter in the Park celebration and various
recreational programs.
• Youth in Government Day - SYAC held its first Youth In Government Day on Wednesday,
April 30, 1997, which centered around a discussion of the issues regarding drug and
S
alcohol abuse by Southlake youth. The group first focused on defining the problems with
students using drugs and alcohol and discussed possible solutions for the School District
SYAC Annual Report
Page 2
• and the City to consider when addressing these issues. SYAC representatives presented
their recommendations to the City Council and School Board on June 10 at the joint City
Council/CISD meeting.
• Austin Trip - SYAC took their annual trip to Austin on April 23, 1997. The students
observed the legislature in action by attending both the House of Representatives and the
Senate in session. Representative Nancy Moffat recognized the students during the session
and briefly visited with the group. The students also met Senator Jane Nelson and received
a packet of information from the Senator. The final aspect of the trip included a visit to
the Texas Supreme Court where the students observed two cases being appealed before the
Supreme Court Justices.
• By-laws - SYAC developed and adopted a set of by-laws to establish rules for the
Commission to follow. The by-laws address a number of items including SYAC
membership, attendance, officer elections, and meeting times and location.
• Southlake Youth of the Year Award - In conjunction with the Southlake Chamber of
Commerce, SYAC developed it's first annual "Youth of the Year Award." The award
recognizes a Southlake youth with exceptional leadership skills, community involvement,
and excellent grades. The award was presented at the Chamber's annual awards banquet in
January.
•
Goals for 1997-1998:
The Southlake Youth Action Commission has developed great plans for the 1997-1998 school
year. The three areas of focus include Community Service Projects, Youth in
Government/Leadership Programs, and Voice of Youth Forums. The following list identifies
SYAC's goals for next year.
Community Service Projects
Host Sister Cities Dinner
Fund Raiser to donate to needy cause
Participate in two Habitat for Humanity Projects
Sponsor a food drive and volunteer at a soup kitchen
Participate in Christmas for Kids Project
Participate in the Texas Trash Off •
Sponsor a Campaign Month like Random Acts of Kindness Month
Volunteer at a Ronald McDonald House
Participate in a Native Plant Project
Develop program for "Make A Difference Day"
4/./
•
SYAC Annual Report
Page 3
• Youth in Government/Leadership Programs
Participate in a Ropes Course
Attend programs to learn about Local and State Government
Visit the State Capitol to learn more about State Government
Participate in Leadership building programs
Participate in a Youth In Government Day Program
Voice of Youth Forums
Hold two to three forums to discuss issues affecting youth of Southlake
Sponsor Youth of the Year Award
Respectively Submitted:
Erin Anderson, Chairperson 1997-1998
•
•
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO:
Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Whitehead, Director of Publi
SUBJECT: c Works
Request to Advertise;or700 BftSidelocated ids for the Five Million of T.W.T North of Kirkwood
Ground
Storage Ta
�• King Rd, . ood Blvd.
on the East
BACKGROUND
As part of the Cit
tank has bee Y's water improve
propose n planned for ions improvement projects a five
traction on T, million gallon ground storage
�4 Inc � smission tr W• King Rd. This tank will be fed
e from Ft. Worth via Trophy Club. by a
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends a request for advertisement for bids for the construction of a 5
million gallon ground storage tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Blvd. on the
east side of T.W. King Rd. be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council
Agenda for City Council Consideration.
CRE/cre
Attachment: Location Map
5A-1
L.
\)\1
sy
Y1‘,
Ig
111
5A-2
`
` City of Southlake,Texas
0 MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Request to Advertise for Bids for the Five Million Gallon Ground
Storage Tank located 2,700 ft. North of Kirkwood Blvd. on the East
Side of T.W. King Rd.
BACKGROUND
As part of the City's water improvement projects a five million gallon ground storage
tank has been planned for construction on T.W. King Rd. This tank will be fed by a
proposed 24-inch transmission line from Ft. Worth via Trophy Club.
RECOMMENDATION
S
City staff recommends a request for advertisement for bids for the construction of a 5
million gallon ground storage tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Blvd. on the
east side of T.W. King Rd. be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council
Agenda for City Council Consideration.
CRE/cre
Attachment: Location Map
•
5A-1
J
•
PROPOSED BOOSTER
TANK NO. 2
1 (----'
/
Sy
,i
tirr
__,.ii_____.,.._
L.7:,A
t �
-4
Duthlak
1
Public Works — Engineering
•
5A-2
City of Southlake,Texas
MEMORANDUM
• June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright
Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along E.
Southlake Blvd., from S. White Chapel Blvd. East to Miron Drive
BACKGROUND
On November 5, 1996 the City entered into a contract with Wright Construction, Inc.
for the installation of a 20-inch water line from White Chapel Blvd., along Southlake
Blvd. to Miron Drive. This line is to provide service the southeast quadrant of the City
and provide the volume of water needed at Village Center from a proposed water tower
to be located in the Miron Addition that will be scheduled for construction in FY97-98.
• The FY96-97 Capital Improvement Projects Budget included $750,000 for the 20-inch
water line along Southlake Blvd. There are numerous utilities located in Southlake
Blvd.'s right-of-way, therefore forcing the City to acquire easements. Funds for the
20-inch water line and easements are drawn from the Utility Fund with the Utility Fund
to be reimbursed from bond sales.
DISCUSSION
There has been an increase in the cost of this project for the following reasons:
• It was necessary to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway so the water line
could be installed without disturbing the new pavement.
• A change in valves from a "mechanical joint" to a flange connection to reduce
future maintenance.
• Installation of an additional 20-inch x 12-inch tap on N. White Chapel.
The original contract price is $540,231.00. The result of this proposed change order
will be a net increase of$21,185.00 for a total contract price of$561,416.40.
5B-I
r
• RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order
No. 1 with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line along
Southlake Blvd., from White Chapel Blvd. to Miron Drive, to be placed on the June
17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council consideration.
CRE/cre
Attachment: Change Order No. 1
S
•
5 B-2
• CHANGE ORDER No. 1
Dated: May 16. 1997
OWNER's Project No. ENGINEER's Project No. 001-432
Project Water Improvements. 20"Water Line. N. White Chapel Blvd to the Miron Addition
OWNER City of Southlake
Contract For Water Improvements Contract Date: November 5. 1996
To: Wright Construction, Inc.
Contractor
You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract:
City of Southlake
Owner
By
Ill Dated , 1997
Nature of the Changes:
1) Adapt 20"valves from M.J. to flange for$2,245.00 each x 5 ea. = $ 11,225.00
2) Add 20"x 12"tap at N. White Chapel for$3,030.00 each x 1 ea. = 3,030.00
3) Install 30"casing in open cut at Byron Nelson Pkwy.for$77.00 per LF x 90 LF = 6.930.00
Total = $21,185.00
These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time:
Contract Price Prior to.This Change Order $ 540.231.00
Net(Increase)(Decrease)Resulting from This Change Order $ 21.185.00
Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 561.416.40
• NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition)
Page 1 of 2
58-3
411)
Contract Time Prior to This Change 120 calendar days
(Days or Date)
Net Resulting from This Change Order 0
(Days)
Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 120 calendar days
(Days or Date)
The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham&Associates
Engineer
By
Date May 16 , 1997
The Above Changes Are Accepted: Wri ht Constr ction
Con r
0 By
44
Date // J~ —/ , 1997
F:\W ORD\SOUTHLAK\432\change.order I.wpd
S
Page 2 of 2
58-4
City of Southlake,Texas
MEMORANDUM
• June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright
Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along E.
Southlake Blvd., from S. White Chapel Blvd. East to Miron Drive
BACKGROUND
On November 5, 1996 the City entered into a contract with Wright Construction, Inc.
for the installation of a 20-inch water line from White Chapel Blvd., along Southlake
Blvd. to Miron Drive. This line is to provide service the southeast quadrant of the City
and provide the volume of water needed at Village Center from a proposed water tower
to be located in the Miron Addition that will be scheduled for construction in FY97-98.
• The FY96-97 Capital Improvement Projects Budget included $750,000 for the 20-inch
water line along Southlake Blvd. There are numerous utilities located in Southlake
Blvd.'s right-of-way, therefore forcing the City to acquire easements. Funds for the
20-inch water line and easements are drawn from the Utility Fund with the Utility Fund
to be reimbursed from bond sales.
DISCUSSION
There has been an increase in the cost of this project for the following reasons:
• It was necessary to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway so the water line
could be installed without disturbing the new pavement.
• A change in valves from a "mechanical joint" to a flange connection to reduce
future maintenance.
• Installation of an additional 20-inch x 12-inch tap on N. White Chapel.
The original contract price is $540,231.00. The result of this proposed change order
will be a net increase of$21,185.00 for a total contract price of$561,416.40.
•
5B-1
/ F
f
I
• RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order
No. 1 with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line along
Southlake Blvd., from White Chapel Blvd. to Miron Drive, to be placed on the June
17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council consideration.
CRE/cre
Attachment: Change Order No. 1
S
S
5 B-2
• CHANGE ORDER No. 1
Dated: May 16, 1997
OWNER's Project No. ENGINEER's Project No. 001-432
Project Water Improvements, 20"Water Line, N. White Chapel Blvd to the Miron Addition
OWNER City of Southlake
Contract For Water Improvements Contract Date: November 5, 1996
To: Wright Construction. Inc.
Contractor
You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract:
City of Southlake
Owner
By
• Dated , 1997
Nature of the Changes:
1) Adapt 20"valves from M.J. to flange for$2,245.00 each x 5 ea. = $11,225.00
2) Add 20"x 12"tap at N. White Chapel for$3,030.00 each x 1 ea. = 3,030.00
3) Install 30"casing in open cut at Byron Nelson Pkwy.for$77.00 per LF x 90 LF = 6,930.00
Total = $21,185.00
These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time:
Contract Price Prior to.This Change Order $ 540.231.00
Net(Increase)(Decrease) Resulting from This Change Order $ 21.185.00
Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 561.416.40
NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition)
•
Page 1 of 2
5B-3
a/ r
• Contract Time Prior to This Change 120 calendar days
(Days or Date)
Net Resulting from This Change Order 0
(Days)
Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 120 calendar days
(Days or Date)
The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham&Associates
Engineer �
By ,e%4�f// —�
Date May 16 , 1997
The Above Changes Are Accepted: Wri ht Constr ction
Conn- r
By
• /1i /Date % J" , 1997
F:\WORD\SOUTHLAK\432\change.order l.wpd
•
Page 2 of 2
5B-4
City of Southlake,Texas
0
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: MESA Design Group Professional Services Contract for Bicentennial Park-
Phase II Construction Project
On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the MESA
Design Group of Dallas professional services contract for the Bicentennial Park - Phase II
construction project. Phase II construction includes the construction plans for 12 lighted
tennis courts, three basketball courts, two sand volleyball courts, an in-line hockey court, a
concession/restroom/pro-shop, hike and bike trail, landscaping, parking, drives and berms.
The fees are included in the SPDC construction budget for this project. The enclosed contract
has been reviewed by the City Attorney, minor changes are being made.
• Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to consider the MESA
Design Group Professional Services Contract for Bicentennial Park- Phase II Construction
Project.
Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if you have any questions.
es.2—__
KML
•
II 5-C
e
. .
MESA
DESIGN GROUP
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 1
PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
June 2, 1997
Kim Lenoir
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Southlake
400 North White Chapel Avenue
Southlake,Texas 76092
Project: Bicentennial Park Phase II
Southlake,Texas
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The consultant will provide the following planning and professional services for Bicentennial Park
Phase II—Southlake,Texas.This scope of services shall apply to Phase II.
• DESIGN SERVICES
A. Data Collection/Site Reconnaissance
1. Acquire digital survey and perform on the ground field check for accuracy; tie down
metes and bounds;locate significant trees.
2. Visit the site and coordinate pre-design meeting with Park Department to review scope
and program.
3. Perform environmental review/analysis.
4. Begin hydrology analysis/watershed review,collect drainage infrastructure information.
5. Perform site analysis considering all of the following elements:
Natural Features Cultural Features
Topography/slope Surrounding land uses
Native vegetation/plant communities Utilities
•
Water character/drainage Existing structures/roads
B. Conceptual Design/Master Plan
1. Define specific program and facilities desired; provide alternatives and options to staff
for input.
2. Coordinate user input/review meetings during master plan phase and provide support
• graphics as needed.
3. Prepare two conceptual design alternatives in freehand manner to include at least all of
C:\Idwinietrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Puk Ptuae II.doc
Landscape Architecture
3100 McKinnon Street/Suite 905 LB 152/Dallas,Texas 75201
214/871-0568 Fax 214/871-1507
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 2
the following elements:
(12)Lighted Tennis Courts Parking lot and drives to be
determined
Concession/Restrooms building(1) Pond or water feature if applicable
Hike and bike trail In-line Hockey Rink
1500 SF Pro-shop Basketball Courts
Landscaping Sand Volleyball Courts
Landscaped Berms
4. Review alternative plans with Park staff for input.
5. Refine one conceptual design;prepare preliminary cost estimate with options.
6. Review with staff and SPDC for comment and approval.
C. Design Development
1. Perform on the ground limited tree survey and topography survey for facilities to be
• constructed.
2. Prepare base sheets on AutoCAD Release 13 at 1"40'scale for overall site and 1"=20'
scale for detail areas.
3. Refine design of all recreation facilities such as tennis courts, basketball courts, trails,
concession building,sand volleyball,in-line hockey,and landscaping.
4. Refine hardscape design;prepare materials palette for review.
5. Prepare architectural floor plans and elevations for all buildings and vertical structures;
present materials palette.
6. Refine grading and pond development ideas,perform hydrology and hydraulics analysis.
7. Refine planting design;prepare introduced plant material palette for review.
8. Prepare preliminary utilities layout to include water,sewer and electrical.
9. Prepare conceptual lighting plan.
10. Prepare final design or provide cut sheets on all equipment for constructed facilities.
11. Prepare final design development plan on computer.
12. Prepare updated cost estimate.
13. Review with staff for comment and approval on periodic basis.
14. Other plans as required.
15. Review with staff and SPDC for comment and approval.
D. Construction Documents
1. Prepare 100% construction documents on AutoCAD Release 13 with separate files for
each sheet to include but not limited to all of the following:
a. Site layout plan.
b. Site materials plan.
c. Site grading plans,details and specifications.
C:\Adainlstrstive\pendpropl\Biccntenniai Park Phase II.doc
5-C-3
1111
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 3
d. Parking and roadway details and specifications.
e. Civil engineering and drainage.
f. Tennis court plans,details and specifications.
g. In-line hockey rink plans,details,and specifications.
h. Sand volleyball court plans,details,and specifications.
i. Basketball court plans,details,and specifications.
j. Architectural structures plans,details and specifications.
k. Site electrical plans,details and specifications.
I. Water and sewer utility plans,details and specifications.
m. Planting plans,details and specifications.
n. Irrigation plans,details and specifications.
o. Signage plans,details and specifications.
p. Lighting plans,details and specifications.
q. Trail details and specifications.
r. Other plans as required.
2. The consultant will finalize all plans and prepare bid documents.
3. Prepare final cost estimate to make determination on alternates for bid purposes.
41111 E. Bidding
1. Consultant will coordinate all printing and bidding with City staff/purchasing
department.
2. Coordinate pre-bid conference.
3. Attend bid opening.
4. Provide review/analysis of bids for City.
F. Contract Administration/Construction Observation
The Consultant will provide the following services during the construction phase:
1. Attend pre-construction meeting.
2. Review and approve shop drawings.
3. Perform monthly site reviews.
4. Perform final punchout.
5. Perform one year guarantee punch out.
Note: The City of Southlake will administrate all job progress paperwork including but
not limited to meeting documentation, review of pay requests, requests for information,
change orders,requests for pricing,etc.
G. Meetings
The Consultant will prepare to attend the following meetings as determined by the Park and
Recreation Department:
C:\Adainistcative\pendpropl\Bicenteanial Part Phase ILdoc
6a 4
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 4
1. Two(2)user meetings/workshops.
2. Four(4)SPDC Meetings.
3. One(1)City Council Meeting.
4. Bi-weekly park staff progress meeting as appropriate.
SPECIAL SERVICES
A. Surveying
1. Boundary Check-Utilizing the deed of record and surveys for the Brunson/bank tract the
boundary will be located in the field and established for reference to the proposed site
improvements.
2. Topographic Survey- A complete topographic survey of the Brunson/bank tract will be
made to the boundary limits. A survey along the proposed parking area outside of these
tracts shall be made in the field. Quality hardwood and native trees shall be tied
throughout the property.
• 3. Public Utility Coordination - Public utilities shall be contacted to confirm existence of
underground facilities. The public utilities shall be requested to flag their underground
facilities in the field. The markings for utilities shall be field tied as a part of Item A-2
above.
B. Drainage Analysis,Hydraulic Studies
1. Preliminary Studies - Provide (2) conceptual grading and drainage studies to explore
drainage alternatives. Preliminary earthwork calculations shall be performed to assist in
making determinations regarding the final grading plan. The final grading plan may
include adding ponds or alterations to limit import of fill material.
2. Final Recommendations- Recommendations will be provided in a brief letter report and
a representative from the Civil Engineer will be available for meetings with and
presentations to Southlake Public Works Department.
C. Reimbursables
The Consultant will provide the following non-labor expense items to be reimbursed by the
City:
1. Soil Borings/Geotechnical Report
Acquire four(4)soil borings to a depth of approximately twenty feet.
• 3 . Other Reimbursables
The Consultant will utilize certain non-labor costs, which will be billed to the client as
C:\ldWinietrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase II.doc
`D C -5
0
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 5
follows.
a. Photostats or photocopying
b. Binding
c. Printing-sets of construction documents for bidding and construction.
d. Photography
e. Mylars
f. Delivery Fees
g. Mailing
h. Drawings not described in the Scope of Services
i. Blue printing other than two sets of development design documents for the Owner
j. Long distance telephone calls
k. Mileage @.32
I. Travel expenses
m. Other products and services requested by the Client and not specifically described
herein.
n. Facsimile
o. CAD plotting
0 D. Services Not Included
1. Concrete testing for road/parking construction would be in General Contractor's scope.
0
C:\Ndainistrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase It.doc
V 0. 4
1111
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 6
COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
PHASE II-CITY FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS(S1,350,000.00)
DESIGN SERVICES
A. Schematic Design
Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00
B. Design Development
Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00
C. Construction Documents
Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00
D. Bidding
Lump Sum Basis $6750.00
E. Contract Administration/Construction Observation
Lump Sum Basis $6,750.00
SUBTOTAL DESIGN SERVICES S94,500.00
SPECIAL SERVICES
A. Survey
Lump Sum Basis $7,500.00
B. Platting Services
Lump Sum Basis $5,500.00
C. Reimbursables
1.Soil Borings not to exceed $4,200.00
2.Other Reimbursables not to exceed $10,800.00
TOTAL FEES-PHASE I S122,500.00
C:\lellainiatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase II.doc
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 7
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
A. Services requested, but not specifically included in the scope of service will be considered
additional services. Modification to drawings,after approval by client,as a result of changes
requested by client or other consultants will be considered additional services and billed at
and hourly rate as follows:
B. Additional Public Meetings
Public meetings/work sessions beyond those specified will be charged as additional services
on an hourly basis.
Additional Services
Hourly Basis:
Principal $120.00
Associate $75.00
• Landscape Architect $65.00
Landscape Technician $45.00
Clerical $35.00
CONDITIONS
A. MESA Design Group, Inc. may subcontract consultants in the performance of any services
described in this agreement.
B. MESA Design Group, Inc. does not act as General Contractor in any way, or accept
responsibility for poor craftsmanship.
C. The above described compensation for MESA Design Group, includes the following non-
labor reimbursable cost defined as follows:
1. Photostats or photocopying
2. Binding
3. Printing-Thirteen sets of documents for construction •
4. Photography
5. Mylars
6. Delivery Fees
7. Mailing
8. Drawings not described in the Scope of Services
9. Blue printing,printing or binding for bidding purposes
10. Long distance telephone calls
• 11. Mileage @$0.32
12. Travel expenses
CAadminiatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phaee II.doc
BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1"
SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page S
13. Other products and services requested by the Client and not specifically described herein.
14. Surveying as required
There will be a 10% Administrative Fee for all reimbursable expenses to compensate for
bookkeeping.
D. Either Owner or Consultant may terminate this contract with thirty(30)days written notice.
Upon termination, Owner will be responsible for payment of all Consultant fees and
reimbursables expended through the date of termination.
E. Compensation for all services shall be paid in Dallas,Dallas County,Texas.
F. Payment Schedule: Billing will be on a design progress basis at the end of each month.
Submitted by:
MESA DESIGN GROUP
William T.Arterburn
Principal
Accepted by:
City of Southlake
Date
Return Copy Enclosed
C:\Adnlniatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Pt.,e II.doc
MESA Design Group
City of Southlake, Texas
Proposed Schedule- Bicentennial Park-Phase II Construction
Exhibit "2"
TASK MONTH SPDC/STAFF JUNE a JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER
WEEK USER 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 PROGRAM X X X X X X
2 SCHEMATIC PLAN X _ X X \_c)
3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY X X X
4 COST ESTIMATE X X
5 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT X _ X X X X
6 PROGRAM EVALUATION X
7 COST ESTIMATE X X
8 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS-50% X X X X X
9 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS-85% X X X X
10 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS- 100% X _ X
11 COST ESTIMATE _ X X
12 PUBLIC REVIEW X X
13 ISSUE FOR BID X X
14 BID OPENING _ X X
15 AWARD CONTRACT X
16 CITY COUNCIL X X X X X
17 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION X
projects\bicentennial park.xls
•
City of Southlake,Texas
• MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Amendment to Proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and
Associates for Bob Jones Park Construction
On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the amendment to
proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and Associates for Bob Jones Park
Construction. This amendment takes the construction project to the next phase in preparing
plans for landscape, irrigation, parking lots, drives, and fencing. The fees are included in the
SPDC construction budget for this project.
Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to consider the
amendment to Proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and Associates for Bob
Jones Park Construction
• Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if any havequestions.
you
(L/2
L
KML
•
• 5-D
1il
II j
1
I ,' ' II w II At I ' i V ' t V 1 i
V 1 ,1
$ ti ItJ til '''l
li 'ILI
Att
�� Q�sQ 8ation, 1cg, /11Lhag s�'ales,Lih:etiol
a � ► Texas, p d fen
d111�the work tour fig Will beg rdesign will be subcont
be ponsible for the racted to
� rfortned by Ms. Griffith'sforfirm,coordination
��Propose for the
`�r � se that our proposal dated
listed
above, t0 the site gradingplans March 17, 1997 be amended to add the remaining
currently being completed.
Our fee for the remaining portion of the project shall be a flat fee, as before, of 9.8% of the actual
Construction costs. The 9.8% relates to 6.8% for design, and 3.0% for surveying. This fee shall
include compensation for any work performed by any subcontracting consultants.
The construction budget for this project is 1.5 million dollars. Therefore, the total design,
engineering , and surveying fees for the entire project, including grading, shall not exceed
$134,000. This would leave $1,366,000 for construction costs.
All remaining terms, scope of services and other conditions of our March 17 proposal shall be
applicable to the remaining work to be performed.
III 5--u
-1____
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS
A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc.
1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011
817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 • Fax 817/265-8532
CHEATHAM
III AND
ASSOCIATES
June 2, 1997
Ms. Kim Lenoir
Director of Parks & Recreation
City of Southlake
667 N. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092
Re: Amendment to Proposal for
Engineering Services Regarding
Proposed Improvements at Bob Jones Park
As you are aware, Cheatham and Associates is currently preparing a grading plan for the
proposed improvements at Bob Jones Park. Our proposal dated March 17, 1997 pertained to this
phase of the project.
We have basically completed the grading plan and contour elevations for the proposed soccer
• fields and related parking. The next step in our design process will be to prepare construction
plans and contract documents for the parking lots and drives, water lines, drainage swales,
landscaping, irrigation and fencing for the proposed soccer facilities.
We are anticipating that the landscaping, irrigation, and fencing design will be subcontracted to
Lauren Griffith Associates of Houston, Texas. Our firm will be responsible for the coordination
of the entire design aspect, including the work to be performed by Ms. Griffith's firm, for the
entire project.
We hereby propose that our proposal dated March 17, 1997 be amended to add the remaining
work listed above, to the site grading plans currently being completed.
Our fee for the remaining portion of the project shall be a flat fee, as before, of 9.8% of the actual
construction costs. The 9.8%relates to 6.8% for design, and 3.0% for surveying. This fee shall
include compensation for any work performed by any subcontracting consultants.
The construction budget for this project is 1.5 million dollars. Therefore, the total design,
engineering , and surveying fees for the entire project, including grading, shall not exceed
$134,000. This would leave $1,366,000 for construction costs.
All remaining terms, scope of services and other conditions of our March 17 proposal shall be
applicable to the remaining work to be performed.
O S--D
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS
A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc.
1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011
817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 • Fax 817/265-8532
t
• Ms. Kim Lenoir June 2, 1997
City of Southlake Page 2
If this amendment to our proposal meets with your approval, please indicate by signing in the
space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. The
opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Eddie Cheatham, P.E.
F:\WORD\PROPOSAL\SOUTI LAK\Bob Jones.Amend.wpd
Authorization to Proceed:
Accepted this Day of , 1997
By:
• Title:
- D5
City of Southlake,Texas
• MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Authorize the City to Advertise for Bids for the Grading of Bob Jones Park-
Phase I
On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the grading plan for
Bob Jones Park - Phase I. The grading plan is enclosed. The proposed bidding schedule is as
follows:
Date Day Group Comments
6/17 Tuesday City Council Authorize the City to Advertise for bids
6/18 Wednesday Cheatham Bid Packets ready for pick-up
6/22 Sunday Star-Telegram Public Advertisement
6/29 Sunday Star-Telegram Public Advertisement
7/9 Wednesday City Hall/City Secretary Open Bids - 10:00 am
7/14 Monday SPDC Review tabulations and award bid
7/15 Tuesday City Council Review tabulations and award bid
Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to authorize the City to
advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park- Phase I
Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if you have any questions.
KML
•
5-E
' City of Southlake
T City Council Meeting Absence
j' • .c as requested by a Councilmember
III � r
If you are absent or plan to be absent from a City Council meeting, please complete
this notice and submitt to Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary. The Home Rule Charter
states, "The Mayor or a Council member shall forfeit his or her office if during a term
of office, the Mayor or Council member fails to attend two consecutive regular
meetings of the Council without being excused by the Council." In compliance with
this requirement, your notice will be submitted to the Council and, if necessary, an
"excused" absence will be pursued by the Council.
0
Councilmember: rd/h4,1tt. (/, Adzz,)
Date(s) of Absence: 9tOtt- _ /97 C1✓ - -/u- / /9 97
Reason for Absence: tt--1 i'7 &Al
S "Excused" Absence Requested: 1/ Yes No
If you have any questions, please contact Sandy LeGrand at (817) 481-5581, ext. 704.
For Office Use Only
Date notice submitted: ,/ /LL'e, /`2 9
Excused Absence Requeste : ✓ Yes No
Date Absence Considered at Council Meeting: gtzt,e_./7) /g 2 7
Council Granted "Excused" Absence: Ye No
L Copy to City Manager
III �I Copy to Mayor/Councilmembers
C:\WPFILES\CITYSEC\CCABSECE.FRM
City of Southlake,Texas
• STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA 97-035 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-245
Rezoning/A portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron
Addition
STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition,
according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T.
and being approximately 0.346 acres.
LOCATION: West side of Miron Drive being approximately 680' south of the
intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and Miron Drive.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee
CURRENT ZONING: "B-1" Business Service Park District
1110 REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "B-2"
Commercial Manufacturing District uses
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial
NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5)
RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area:
• Smock& Husseini JV, N.M. Smock, 1529 Lambert
Blvd., Oakland CA 94602, undecided. "We do not
know what the ramifications would be to our
adjacent property with this zoning."
P&Z ACTION: April 17, 1997; Approved (5-0)Applicant's request to table until the
May 22, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
May 22, 1997; Approved (7-0).
• COUNCIL ACTION: June 3, 1997; Approved(5-0)First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-245.
7/ "/
City of South lake,Texas
410 STAFF COMMENTS: The purpose for the rezoning of this strip of land is to avoid a split lot
zoning classification within the proposed Lot 4R, Block 1 Miron
Addition. This strip of land is the remainder of Lot 3 (Zoned"B 1")
located between the land purchased by the City and the R.O.W. quit
claimed to the owner of Lot 4 (Zoned"S-P-2"). The rezoning of this
strip will result in all of the proposed Lot 4R being zoned "S-P-2".
The City Zoning Administrator has waived the Concept Plan
requirement for this strip and has informed the owner that a revised
Concept Plan for the entirety of Lot 4R will be required prior to
issuance of any building permit.
L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-035Z.WPD
•
•
... i•„ - Li
8.77 illim
— .,,, ___ __- 1.1 ,
•
_.. 1 , ,0
S.119.11,1'• 5A2 Ex r 1
N-1:: :7.."-: 80.1 Ac
• -
.LI
.• 1
HALL - - I&IA
''•.--. ' •0." I
-... /
A-093
30. -...
I &DS
/ • 3 t ...:...__
IA
-
RICH RD 10
1AL: 1111111 did Ill
KY A-401
ct:IT • ' A..(-6,
,
. -7). .,..
<(' ,,.....- .
t.1141111 .
IA '</i. ..„.•
,i, 4 1
.1
I 5A4 5D1 I IIIR. /2.rv,t JIM
1 . ! )- .. .• ..
THOPIA3-.MO. HAH z . cm Ina
.:dimmr .. .. •
.. .. g .-•f• • Eri -.. -3,...3.
7 ..• , .. .
. •. : SURWY A-104 z I;„ill IMPIII 3
I i ./'.
2A 2
.MOEN.
28-....,.... -',...,...2----,, ,-----5,._,..-- 21)
.--t-4.--i- .-. 1... 3 213IA 2CI 5 SC1 C l' ---- ,. 3A2 3A1 pirrall 1111111
• --I . ' ....%‘ 'TY -___ , w•lain
r- Os III:C.,•ir.,....... \ HALL ..,,,-..._...-- gyi 0 _._._:
•-- •sr orA... II Du Cil
3A
5- :
_.
281 .4 . ._._._
..---- ----
,estarrHow.
i
•!,. i i i i \ 154- ----i -.__
I 582 58.20'
gOil. ---- ,-- .___ • W.:IiBlIIMAA g
!• iiiii. 5A '
INC$19
Acg—
': i 1 ; • ---• ..
2A • !
-
!
i NORTHWEST PKWY5828 582A
. 1 IIIIIMINI 18
.:-- NINIMMIESI tt_that„... .
iiiiP- E1- •• EAST
orr 1 0 0
30
2A1 • 12/1)! /-----Thi------\_..........,zzr_Tio
......,--..
I
,op.AR i
.. I . 3 k 38 .
• ,t !
Th
7.665 Ac r pti,'301
3 Ac f RAR N
• 10- ,---6- . "4
5iiig------_11-
11..3A, 304 33 il t-, A i• AP
3,,....z.:(,.. 1709) I:E3 EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD.
2A21.-.
1
-
— - -- - - -
,---.4D
2 a 832 18 i 1E2 L....4__
33361, 4C
22 1828 28 2C
'0---,d.:K14-i,,A,21.< : 2E dizrzra.5 IA
--1 G°R13 i '-' -• - 15 Ac ,
3D -7 mig
30.6 Ac :riZ 2A3A 7 2A2
'I
15 Ac... .. ....--_.
.11 k I •••••-• 3 Ac
3D2 r A°I) -___. •
\ 1, I A \ 7 14 ) ! 1 ,, ; ; -; -; -, ,, ,, .._ ' .-._..
iC 2A3A
'‘. weir:. 0,:
.--
/! .0 ,..•''. ' 12.09 Ac ,.1
'..--':-.;."'''...g% '‘ .! i 111 . 11 % ....,
r...".
3 .. . •-g- 0 0 P . ' .-
, J--4--- ,
. ., i ._.----
ID Is;.... ... \- :k 1 i l' i i ! .1 V .—.—( _ —.— .=, •
i .,. X ,. 'Is, ! ! , i • ! , ! I ! ', 2 "fc OW
4E1 /I 4 r --. .- ;,- i , . . e. *-1-•'• . ,. , ._IT--,-r.i..j1.4._. . % ,„,,,,j g ._._._.__._._._
........., .- i .‘ - • x 1. i ••-,,H r4 Ai
i ,...: '.
.. _ii..../0. •- •.- ,iip„.„-. . Jak.- - •
3.6 Ac
,-
......
20 Ac .. 2 i ,11 1. ., II i 1 1 i E C, /, i i I
....,
1 1 rrS 110
..... ...1
r.''':',...') ••••• ZO' i H i i i ..516L12... / 3D •
.-. -
.... . ......... ........• .
I A ...,•••••• e
AC ._. Ai , . -.. ,...--'-''' 1,,,i
'
---r --if. '; 6'4j'4A#I
1 EA- 6G
i i !
1 I rn S-S 1101
la I 20 Ac G i •
i
f-i 1 ID5A1
40
1B3 3
48 ., V. HALE.) ,....,
_.
11)
t , 3 Ac
BAIA
6A1 i„
11
4A RAWBOW ST.
i
BA1 A2A 24 28 2C1 6.15 Ac
I 6.53 IAc
t i!:'.
1:1 1,11.
.}
AZ I AIC
,. ! ! I ! ! 1! . 6A _
IA2 •
. 683 68 G
, IA 2C \ % fj•I
-
6132 1
61 k
6E 9
•-Zil
16160 I 0.10.
.
13.4 Ac II :- ‘\ IsArIA
•-6F1 6C a ..-..„ F,A
43 AC TRACT MAP.01 •
1 \\
6,- ,
7
ii
sg k Wile DONAL
'1A1- i
EAST DON TINO4TAL f3LVD. ,
.. I L 1 1
_
i ...--/ ---- ----,--''''''‘\ s SUR1rrY A-1013
- - i __ \ •
- '. '. -2A2 ,
\
''. ..___E6r7'-i-r-' ......7.---- 5
2AI I
[11 6.3 Ac
0•111'
.1-1A 1 !1 .i7:1...i
_ •-•.‘,St - I
r'.71'k. ., WO 1134A.1 BDOO
''s 1144 111141( CEI
BBC
''''' or 11,086C1
le* 1045-2A"'" 'mat
,848
1 6 4 1_.
184 K-+ 1646 tom •rg .
.164
" 1641417 -186N
le.s -,184,5 ••5'IQ.. _.... 15,6 Ac 161 A ,
, \\
\‘.
• s
•..\\.,
\
......15 382
181
O 1 R. EADES �Ei 6r
,!.), TR 6
01)
lTR 2A AU SURVEY 481 �� �� 2 . 11
• .o?6 4 (
L 53.497 AC
lR 7A7 493 0
18 .185 0 ,(
•u3 160 1A1/ '"
2A Y� �° A 1 R .047 O
O� 1.522 AC 6 1.03 AC 51 AC 1A 25R1
1515 1.00 AC / 2.07 0 R
28• • j
r'° t.vz % .607 0 •
��'� OAS
4A .ti= .`� ,,
ORB
1.741 0 .50 0
.,.
,A �." r--fi is 'X ,,, SF-1 A
S-P-2 1
12.622 AC ' \2C 25R2 b
• 4C ' , 1 l R O�16 I .06 0 1.001 0
4,0CK&HUSSEINI 2 (OV M.SCHELLING �877
•
D.LIGHT me
O-1 /— Z.- - 1.— - . . 1 • 24
2.958.0 -
13c - • o
(it)
3C1 i Z 3 B-1 J.ADDOCK
1 .S.00 , I ..91
i ,3Se i
M.SCHELLING 23
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE I - , \ .
_
- 6o i • t (Di 4
N 1u 122 ,,. 11. N. l,. 171 101
16 17 - 18 13 19 k 20 R 21 ! 22 R 23 I
/
+. 26 . ' ills LL2 uji 1�4 ( 24 22
1 1N lU ,1. 1,� n �O
WESTMONT CT 5
,a lu 41 71 11/ 117 117 1 .
±1 , „ , , au au
MU
t . 33 .32 31 It 30ficiaS29 g 28 Y 27 3 *26 ' 1 25 I
AT jai . . .
, lip
IC
; • 1,13 ADJACENT OWNERS
37 38 39 i I._ AND ZONING 6
36 mg
'' ''� > "' SPIN #8 PATTIE MINDER 9
1 FOI •
IN ,
161 - N „s 2 Ar
ggz au I ,3,1 I ail L7,3,2
r,
t, 07
• CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-245
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A
PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MIRON ADDITION, AND
BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.346 ACRES IN THE JOHN A.
FREEMAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 529,AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"B-1"
BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT TO "S-P-2"
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH LIMITED "B-2"
COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT
TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
• THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "B-1" Business Service
Park District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-245.W PD
Page 1
• changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
0 who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
S
of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD
Page 2
• Being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition, and being approximately 0.346
acres of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein, from "B-1" Business Service Park District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan
District with limited "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District uses, excluding the
following uses:
25.2a(2) Auto painting facilities;
25.2a(3) Automobile and motorcycle sales/rental;
25.2a(4) Automobile repair/service; muffler shops; oil and lube shops;
25.2a(5) Boat sales, service, repair; recreational vehicle sales;
25.2a(6) Builder's supply, stores, outlets; all materials contained within the
building;
25.2a(7) Bus station;
25.2a(10) Farm implement sales and service;
25.2a(18) Retail activity of a service nature;
25.2a(19) Retail uses related to the principal uses.
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
S
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
IIISection 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD
Page 3
• of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SSection 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997.
S
MAYOR
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD
Page 4
• ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
•
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-245.W PD
Page 5
• EXHIBIT "A"
COMMENCING at a 5/8" iron pin found at the Southwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 1 of said
Miron Addition, said iron pin also being on the North line of Oak Tree Estates, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2121 PRTCT, said iron
pin also being the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Vol. 388-156, Pg. 12 PRTCT; THENCE
N 00°08'52" E along the East line of Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, a distance of 255.62
feet to a 5/8 iron pin found for the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract;
THENCE N 00°08'52" E along the East line of said Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, a
distance of 33.92 feet;
THENCE N 89°58'04" E, a distance of 463.11 feet to the Point of Curvature of a non-tangent
• circular curve to the left having a radius°of�75.00 feet and a central angle of 35°25'14" and being
subtended by a chord which bears S 41 56 56 W, 45.63 feet;
THENCE Southerly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 46.37 feet;
THENCE S 89°58'04" W, a distance of 432.70 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING and
containing 15,084 square feet or 0.346 acres of land.
S
L.\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-245.W PD
Page 6
rl 2- 1n
City of South lake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
• June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Second Reading, Ordinance No. 480-Y, Personal Care Facilities
Attached is the same draft of Ordinance No.480-Y recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning
Commission with a(6-1) vote. The dissenting Commissioner, Lanny Tate, felt that the ordinance did not
provided enough housing units per acre to make the project viable to the developer, especially at the cost
of non-residential properties in Southlake today. On June 3, the City Council approved the first reading
of the ordinance on their consent agenda with a(5-0) vote.
History
The Council declared a moratorium on personal care facilities ("assisted living facilities") on December
3, 1996 as a result of the Kingsley Place application. This case raised certain issues (e.g., adjacency to
residential properties, traffic, parking, institutional appearance, density, and the appropriate method of
approval(straight zoning or SUP). The Council directed Staff to prepare an ordinance revision addressing
these concerns and to seek the Commission's recommendation.
The Commission has struggled for four months with the appropriate district(s) in which to place these
. . . . . . . . . . . . . with of facilities. They have looked at permitting these facilities in all nonresidential districts with an
SUP, have considered creating separate districts (e.g., Retirement Village and Personal Care Facilities),
but have come full-circle and recommended limited nonresidential districts (i.e., C-1, C-2) with an SUP.
Section 1
This ordinance adds four (4) new definitions. Note that the new definition of open space replaces the
current definition [i.e., "an area included in any side, rear or front yard or any unoccupied space on the lot
that is open and unobstructed to the sky except for the ordinary projections or cornice eaves or porches"]
and will be applicable to all references throughout the ordinance with the exception of the PUD district
which defines "Common Open Space" in Section 30.10 specifically for that section as does the MF-2
district which defines "Usable Open Space" in Section 17.6 specifically for multi-family development.
This ordinance also establishes a definition of impervious coverage.
Section 2
This section indicates that personal care facilities may be permitted only by SUP and only with the
following underlying zoning districts: C-1 and C-2 and with the criteria addressed in Section 3.
Section 3
The Commission has attempted to balance the impact of this institutional use on adjacent residential
properties while providing certain criteria that enhances the quality of life of the residents of these
facilities. Note that the Maximum Density is twelve (12) housing units per acre with a required twenty
percent(20%) open space. This density mirrors the MF-2 (multi-family) density currently in place in the
ordinance. The parking requirement was reduced from "the greater of 1 space per each 3 beds or 1 space
per individual dwelling (housing) unit" to 10 spaces (to accommodate staff) + 1.5 spaces per each 3 beds.
—1r I
For a sixty-bed facility,the current ordinance requires 60 spaces and the proposed ordinance would require
411)40 spaces. The reduction is recommended because many of the residents of these facilities are not likely
to have a vehicle on site because the average age of the residents is 86 years.
Public Comments: Dick Johnston of the Senior Advisory Committee expressed the need for these types
of facilities for the residents of Southlake and the surrounding communities. He also noted the need for
retirement housing and convalescent facilities as well. He made several general comments about the
ordinance that I said I would pass along to you. Under General Criteria, he did not understand why these
facilities had to be contiguous to the roadways mentioned, but felt that these facilities could be located
behind shopping centers or office complexes and thereby act as a transition from the more intensive use
on the roadway. Under Lot Area, he felt that the five-acre minimum was excessive if the facility was a
single-story structure, but could understand the larger lot requirement if it were two+ stories. Under
Maximum Density, he stated that he appreciated the Commission's attention to quality of life issues, but
would like to remind the Commission that the typical resident of these facilities probably wouldn't be
taking advantage of all the open space, but would be happy with small gardens and benches close to the
facility rather than open spaces and walking paths located at a greater distance from the facility.
al---
KPG
S
S
r1 I-a
• ORDINANCE NO. 480-Y
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480,AS AMENDED,THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS;
AMENDING THE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS SECTION BY ADDING
PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES;ADDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS FOR
PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted
by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the
Local.Government Code; and
• WHEREAS, the city has adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance for the city; and
WHEREAS,the city council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests
of the city to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents by amending
Ordinance No. 480 as provided herein; and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined that for the protection of residents living in
personal care facilities, the minimum standards shall be those standards set forth in the Health and
Safety Code, Chapter 247 and administered by the Texas Department of Human Services; and
WHEREAS, the city council has given published notice and held public hearings with
respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
• OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
L CTYDOC S ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 1
•
• SECTION 1.
Section 4, "Definitions," of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding
definitions for"Housing Unit," "Impervious Coverage," and "Personal Care Facility," by deleting
the current definition of "Open Space"and by adding the new definition of"Open Space" thereto:
Housing Unit-A room or group of rooms used by one or more individuals living separately
from others in the structure, with direct access to the outside or to a public hall and shall
contain separate bathroom facilities and may contain separate kitchen facilities.
Impervious Coverage-the combined area occupied by all principal and accessory buildings,
structures, and paved parking, sidewalks, and driveway areas.
Open Space- an area of a lot either left in a natural state or receiving permeable vegetative
landscape treatment (e.g., ponds and lakes, either natural or manmade, and water features,
grass, shrubs, flowers, trees, ground cover, etc.).
Personal Care Facility - an establishment that furnishes, in one or more facilities,
food and shelter to four or more persons who are unrelated to the proprietor of the
establishment; and provides personal care services; and in addition, provides minor
• treatment under the direction and supervision of the resident's attending physician
licensed by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, or services which meet
some need beyond basic provision of food, shelter, and laundry. Incidental uses
and/or services may include protective supervision, personal care, social and
recreational services, transportation services, private or common kitchen/dining
facilities, so long as such services are provided to residents only."
SECTION 2.
Section 45.1 (38),"Specific Use Permits"of Ordinance No. 480,as amended,is hereby added to read
as follows:
"39. Personal care facilities, subject to the require- C-1,C-2
ments set forth in Section 45.9 of this ordinance.
SECTION 3.
Section 45.9, "SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES," of
• Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby added to read as follows:
L\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONINGW80Y.6 ORD 2
76- ul
S General Criteria
• All personal care facilities shall be situated contiguous to the following roadway
classifications, as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan: freeway,
principal arterial, arterial or collector. This requirement is designed to ensure that
the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes of traffic during
peak hours of traffic loading without a requirement to divert traffic through
traditional residential streets.
• Personal care facilities shall meet all applicable city codes.
• Personal care facilities shall meet the licensing requirements of the Texas
Department of Human Services.
Required Amenities
In an effort to maintain a comfortable lifestyle for the residents and for the
convenience of the employees and the residents' guests,the following amenities shall
be required:
Cafeteria and/or dining room,housekeeping service; furnish or provide transportation
to local facilities that provide a library, game room, and exercise room.
Permitted Amenities
In an effort to enhance the residents' quality of life, certain other special facilities and
services for residents, employees and guests are encouraged(e.g., chapel, swimming
• pool,Jacn77i, home theater, arts and crafts facilities, greenhouse, and related uses).
Permitted Ancillary Uses
The following ancillary uses shall be permitted by right to provide on-site goods and
services for residents and their guests, but are not intended for use by the general
public:
• Snack bar with a maximum of 350 square feet per 100 dwelling units;
• Beauty or barber shop with a maximum of 250 square feet per 100 dwelling units
or a maximum of 450 square feet per 100 dwelling units for combined
operations;
• Convenience retail shop with a maximum of 350 square feet per 100 dwelling
units to provide for the sale of food items, non-prescription drugs, small
household items, and gifts.
• Pharmacy for resident use only.
• Medical treatment services for resident use only (e.g.. physical therapy services,
inhalation therapy, and other related uses).
Concept Plan Requirements
In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 41 of this ordinance, the applicant
shall also provide:
S . A letter describing the facility's services,amenities,and ancillary uses(e.g., level
• of daily patient care and housekeeping, recreational, and support services
available), the type of proposed building(s), including the type of facade and the
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 3
9 I)-5
• number of stories, and the proposed number of occupants and service personnel;
• A floor plan and list of intended uses and the percentage of total floor area that
each use will occupy.
Development Regulations
The following standards and regulations shall apply unless a more stringent standard
is required by the underlying zoning district or the Corridor Overlay Zone (in which
case, the more stringent regulation shall apply):
• Height: No building or structure shall exceed one (1) story, nor shall it
exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height if located within one
hundred(100) feet of property zoned as single family residential
or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's
land use plan.
Buildings and structures located more than 100' from property
zoned as single family residential or designated as low or
medium density residential on the city's land use plan shall be
governed by the height regulations of the underlying zoning
district.
• Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet, except
• where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or
designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land
use plan, there shall be a front yard of not less than forty (40)
feet.
• Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than thirty (30) feet, except
where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or
designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land
use plan, there shall be a side yard of not less than one hundred
(100) feet.
• Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than forty (40) feet, except
where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or
designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land
use plan, there shall be a rear yard of not less than one hundred
(100) feet.
• Maximum All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not
Lot Coverage: exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area.
• Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall be two hundred seventeen
• thousand eight hundred (217,800) square feet, being five acres.
L:\CTYDOCS'.ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 4
• • Floor Area: Each housing unit shall have a minimum floor area based on the
unit type:
• 350 s.f. for efficiency unit
• 450 s.f. for one-bedroom unit
• 550 s.f. for two-bedroom unit
• Maximum The maximum number of housing units per acre shall be twelve (12)
Density: provided at least twenty (20) percent of the lot area is devoted to open
space.
• Impervious The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed seventy(70)percent
Coverage: of the total lot area if(12) housing units are developed.
• Bufferyards: Bufferyards shall be required in accordance with the underlying zoning
district and corridor overlay zone bufferyard requirements.
• Interior Interior landscaping shall be required in accordance with the current
Landscaping landscaping ordinance and corridor overlay zone requirements.
Area:
• Parking: Ten (10) spaces plus 1.5 spaces per each 3 beds.
III
Licensing
• Every Personal Care Facility shall be licensed by the Texas Department of
Human Services as required by the Personal Care Facility Licensing Act, Section
247.021, Tex. Health and Safety Code, V.T.C.A.
SECTION 4.
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such
ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
• sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 5
Sjudgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect
any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance
of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 6.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more
than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to
exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 7.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
• violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning yard regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,
as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in
court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 8.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance
in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of
this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than
the production thereof.
S
L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 6
r fi.;...e
• SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and
penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance,
as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
•
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF
, 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF
, 1997.
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 7
• MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
•
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 8
C-l1)0
till City of Southlake,Texas
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: SECOND READING - Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-G
Draft Three Dated June 9, 1997 (2:46pm)
To follow is draft three of Ordinance No. 483-G, second reading, amending the Subdivision
Ordinance to generally reflect the following changes:
1. References throughout changed from"Zoning Administrator" to the generic "City."
2. References changed which were impacted by the recently adopted Thoroughfare Plan.
3. Preliminary water, sewer, and drainage plan requirements changed to allow the City
Engineer to maintain a list of requirements and to waive the requirements where it does not
provide a benefit to the city.
4. The"Amended Plat"qualifications and review processes changed to align with the state law
S provisions which were adopted a couple years ago. This allows for more staff review of
items where there are no new roads, no increase in the number of lots, etc.
This draft also reflects changes in format to ordinance form, discussions from the first reading, and
additional comments from Councilmember Harris regarding better wording in certain sections. You
will also note changes have been made on pages 9 and 10 (re: amended plat processing) which
accurately reflect the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation on those sections (these
changes are in italic redline and italic strikeout text). These items were shown incorrectly on the first
reading.
Feel free to contact me, Dennis Killough, or Chris Carpenter if you have any questions.
GL/cic q....
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF \SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 1 of 15
76— 1
• ORDINANCE NO. 483-G
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; AMENDING
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS; ADDING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR
PROCESSING AMENDED PLATS; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
CHANGES; PROVIDING RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS THAT
CONFORM TO THE CURRENTLY ADOPTED MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN
PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Local Government Code; and
4110
WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483 as the Subdivision Ordinance for
the City; and
WHEREAS, certain changes in State law have been enacted since the adoption of
Ordinance No. 483, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing
regarding the proposed revisions and has recommended adoption of the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest
of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483 as provided herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings with respect to the amendment of
the Subdivision Ordinance as required by law;
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 2 of 15
-7C- 2
IIINOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE:
SECTION 1. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding the following definition:
COMMON AREA: private lot owned and maintained by the Home Owners
Association.
SECTION 2. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by modifying the following
definition:
PLAT, AMENDED: A plat which meets the procedures and requirements as set
forth in Section 212 of the Local Government Code.
SECTION 3. Item 4, Paragraph B, Section 2.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Any resubdivision of existing platted lots shall require the submittal and approval of
• a Plat Revision or an Amended Plat as authorized by state law.
SECTION 4. Paragraph A, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Application: All Plats to be considered for approval under this ordinance shall be
submitted to the City along with a completed application and fees and must be in
accordance with all ordinance requirements. No plat shall be formally accepted for
review by the City until it fulfills all of the requirements of this ordinance. Any plat
not meeting these requirements shall be deemed an inadequate submittal and shall
not be processed until all submittal requirements are met.
SECTION 5. Paragraph B, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Reproductions: Requirements for blueprints and mylars for all submittals shall be
maintained by the City . It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to verify the
number of prints and mylars required for all submittals. Prints should be folded in
a manner such that the title block and location map shall be easily read from the
outside and have folded dimensions as required by the City. (See appendix for
"preferred" title block format)
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 3 of 15
—IC--;
• SECTION 6. Paragraph E, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Time of Filing. The City will establish a timetable for the filing of plats and other
applications under this ordinance. The timetable will allow sufficient time in order
to comply with necessary notice requirements and reasonable staff review of any plat
or application. No plat or other application shall be officially accepted for filing
except on a scheduled filing deadline. A plat will not be accepted for filing unless
all required drawings, exhibits, studies or other required documentation has been
submitted. A partial filing shall not be considered a filing of record activating the
thirty (30) day review period.
SECTION 7. Item 7, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety and the remaining
items are renumbered accordingly.
SECTION S. Subitem a, Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483
of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
a. Preliminary Drainage Study: A preliminary drainage study shall be
submitted with any plat referenced in this section. This study shall
• include all information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to
adequately protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare
of the applicant and any property impacted by the proposal. The City
Engineer shall have the
discretion to require or waive all or a portion of the
requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit received by the
submittal and review of these plans is not in the best interest of the
public.
SECTION 9. Subitem b, Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483
of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
b. Preliminary Water and Sewer Utility Plans: A preliminary water and
sewer utility plan shall be submitted with any plat referenced in this
section. This plan shall include all information deemed necessary by
the City Engineer to adequately protect and preserve the public health,
safety and welfare of the applicant and any property impacted by the
proposal. The City Engineer shall have the ability to evaluate the need
discretion to require or waive all or a
portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit
received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best
• interest of the public.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFC3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 4 of 15
• SECTION 10. Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding a new subitem c as
follows:
c. Traffic Impact Analysis: A Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted
with a preliminary plat application. The City Engineer or Community
Development Director or their representative shall have the discretion
to require or may waive all or a portion of the requirement for the TIA
upon submittal of sufficient support that the impact threshold
established in the driveway ordinance,as amended,will not be reached
with the submittal.
SECTION 11. Item 17, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Two boundary corners geo-referenced by state plane coordinates in accordance with
Section 8.03(B).
SECTION 12. Item 25, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
• Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order, which shall include
common areas, if any.
SECTION 13. Item 31, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Reproducible acknowledgments, owner's & lienholder's dedication and
endorsements,to include ratification by all lienholders expressing that all dedications
are free and clear of liens and encumbrances, and surveyor's certifications in
accordance with the format shown in the appendices herein(see appendix).
SECTION 14. Subitem a, Item 39, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483
of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
a. Complete and corrected preliminary water and sewer layout. This may
be combined with the drainage study and should show all intended
easements. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to require have
plans referenced in this item anti or
waive all or a portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the
benefit received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the
best interest of the public.
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFf\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFC3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 5 of 15
lc--S
• SECTION 15. Subitem b, Item 39, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483
of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
b. Final Drainage Study: A final drainage study shall be submitted with
any plat referenced in this section. This study shall include all
information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to adequately
protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the
applicant and any property impacted by the proposal. The City
Engineer shall have the discretion to require havc thc ability to
cvaluatc thc nccd for this final drainage study and or waive all or a
portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit
received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best
interest of the public.
SECTION 16. Subitem g, Item 40, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483
of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety.
SECTION 17. Paragraph A, Section 3.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding a new item 3 as
follows:
3. Replat one or more lots fronting on an existing street if:
a. The owners of all those lots join in the application for
amending the plat;
b. The amendment does not attempt to remove recorded
covenants or restrictions;
c. The amendment does not increase the number of lots; and
d. The amendment does not create or require the creation of a
new street or make necessary the extension of municipal
facilities.
SECTION 18. Paragraph B, Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Prior to City approval of a plat revision involving four (4) or more lots, a revised
Preliminary Plat may be required by the City. In addition,a final drainage study may
be required at the discretion of the Dircctor of Public Works City Engineer.
• 1. The City Manager or his designated representative may
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 6 of 15
Swaive the requirement for a revised Preliminary Plat
when the Plat Revision is without significant change of
street location, and without substantial effect on City
services, drainage or adjacent properties.
2. A revised Preliminary Plat may include all the area
within the limits of the original Preliminary Plat except
those areas which have unexpired Final Plat approval
from the City unless this requirement is specifically
waived by the City.
SECTION 19. Paragraph C, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Easement Abandonment: The following procedures are to be used for the
abandonment of easements in the City. The Department of Public Works shall
maintain the forms and procedures for the abandonment of easements. (see
Appendix)In both cases outlined below it will be the responsibility of the applicant
to obtain original signatures from the utility company representatives on the mylar
to be filed at the county prior to the City obtaining the signatures of approval from
the City representative. A processing fee entitled "Easement Abandonment" shall be
• set by Council in the Schedule of Fees. This fee shall be paid upon submittal of the
application and shall not be refunded under any circumstances.
SECTION 20. Item 1, Paragraph C, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
During platting: If the property is being platted then the required abandonment
statement and signature block should be shown on the face of the Plat Revision. The
easement to be abandoned shall be shown in faint lines on the plat and clearly
marked "to be abandoned with this plat."
SECTION 21. Paragraph F, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Public Landscape Easements: A public landscape easement typically ten feet(10')
in width may be dedicated adjacent to public ROW for S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M.
1938, and all streets designated as arterial or collector level thoroughfares as shown
on the approved Master Thoroughfare Plan. This easement shall typically be used to
facilitate coordinated tree and/or landscape plantings along the City's thoroughfares
or for the purpose of planting replacement trees due to necessary removal of
established trees for road expansion or other public improvements within existing
• ROW. This is not a required easement and cannot be required by the City as a part
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 7 of 15
-7 C-?
• of a Developer's Agreement or by any other means. It is intended that the Public
Landscape Easement shall overlap any required bufferyard and further that
provisions of a Public Landscape Easement shall have no bearing on the planting
requirements of the bufferyard.
SECTION 22. Items 1 and 2, Paragraph A, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of
the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows:
A. Authority for Approval:
1. City Staff: The City Manager, upon receiving a
recommendation for approval from the appropriate City
Staff, the City Engineer, and City Attorney, is hereby
granted authority to approve all single-lot Plat Showings,
and Amended Plats as defined herein. An applicant who
is dissatisfied with the decision of the City Manager,
may request that the plat be referred to the Commission
for decision. The decision of the Commission is final.
2. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review and recommend
• approval or disapproval on all Preliminary Plats, Plat
Revisions, and multiple-lot Plat Showings for final
approval by Council. The Commission shall have final
approval on all Final Plats.
SECTION 23. Item 2, Paragraph D, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City
of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
The stipulations of the Plat Review are hereby made conditions of plat approval
unless specifically amended by the City Council, or by the Planning and Zoning
Commission in those cases where their approval is final.
SECTION 24. Item 1,Paragraph E, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Construction Plans/Specs.: Construction plans, specifications and related documents
shall not be required as a prerequisite to the approval and filing of a Plat. However,
some portion of the construction documents may have to be prepared by the
Applicant and submitted for review and approval prior to filing of the Plat should the
Plat be potentially impacted by a construction related issue.
• Approval of construction plans will be a prerequisite to the initiation of any
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 8 of 15
• construction. Plan preparation, submittal and review are outlined in related
ordinances of the City. Fees for administrative review of construction plans shall be
established by City Council.
SECTION 25. Item 1, Paragraph H, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Original Signatures on Mylar: All plats intended to be filed by the City in the County
Plat Records must be signed and notarized as described in the "Procedure for
Recording of Plats" available from the City (see Appendix). There are different
procedures for Tarrant and Denton Counties. A common requirement is that all
revisions to the plat shall be made prior to running the black-line mylars which are
to be signed by the owner,notary,surveyor,and City representatives. The mylars and
prints required by the Counties shall not be accepted for filing by the City if there
is any other original ink, other than signatures and seals, appearing on the plat. The
City will then obtain signatures of the appropriate City representatives.
SECTION 26. Paragraph A, Section 4.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
The Final Plat will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a
• copy of this review given to the applicant. The Final Plat accompanied by the Plat
Review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon
approval by the Commission,the City will obtain the signature of the Commission
Chairman and Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 27. Paragraph B, Section 4.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Multiple-Lot Plat Showings: All multiple-lot Plat Showings will be accepted for
review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the
applicant. The Plat Showing accompanied by the plat review comments shall then
be sent to the Commission for recommendation and the Council for final action.
Upon approval by Council, the City will obtain the signature of the Commission
Chairman and Secretary, and Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in
accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 28. Paragraph A, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Amended Plat.:All Amended Plats will be accepted for review,plat review comments
generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. It will be the applicant's
• responsibility to revise the plat as needed to receive final approval from City Staff.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 9 of 15
• Upon approval, the City will obtain the signature of the Mayor and City Secretary
and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. (As amended by Ord. No. 483-B)
SECTION 29. Paragraph B, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety, and the remaining
Paragraphs are renumbered accordingly:
be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review
shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon approval by the
Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 30. Paragraph A, Section 4.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
All Plat Revisions (Replats) will be accepted for review, plat review comments
generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. A public hearing shall
be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning
and Zoning Commission. City staff will provide notification as required for replats
• under Chapter 212 of the Local Government Code. The Plat Revision accompanied
by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for
recommendation and then to City Council for final action. Upon approval by the
Council, the City will obtain the signature of the Mayor and City Secretary and
file the plat in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 31. Paragraph A, Section 5.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
A. Street right-of-way dedications shall be as shown in the Thoroughfare
Plan and, where not shown therein, shall be not less than the follow-
ing:
STREET TYPE ROW WIDTH
State/County varies (100'-500')
Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 124'
Arterial - Five lane undivided (ASU) 88'
Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 94'
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 10 of 15
SArterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 70
Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 84'
Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 60'
Local Street (non-residential) 60'
Local Street (residential) 50'
SECTION 32. Items 1 and 2, Paragraph F, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the
City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows:
F. Horizontal Alignment:
1. Centerline Radius: The following centerline radii shall be the
minimum allowed in the design of all street construction:
STREET TYPE MINIMUM RADIUS
Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 1400'
• Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) 1000'
Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 1000'
Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 600'
Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 500'
Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 400'
Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer
2. Common Tangents: Reverse Circular Curves having a common tangent
shall be separated by a tangent section in accordance with the following
table:
STREET TYPE MINIMUM TANGENT
BETWEEN CURVES
Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 300'
IIIArterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) 200'
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 11 of 15
-7c. -I i
• Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 200'
Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 100'
Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 75'
Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 50'
Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer
SECTION 33. Items 2 and 3, Paragraph G, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the
City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows:
2. Maximum Grades: No streets shall be designed or constructed with
grades in excess of the following:
STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE
Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 4.0%
Arterial - Five lane undivided & four lane 6.0%
• divided (A5U & A4D)
Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 8.0%
Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 9.0%
Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 10.0%
Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer
3. Vertical Curve Lengths: In order to maintain adequate sight distance,
the following minimum lengths of vertical curves shall be required:
STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE
Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 50 feet for each algebraic
percent difference in grade
Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) and 50 feet for each algebraic
four lane divided (A4D) percent difference in grade
Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 50 feet for each algebraic
percent difference in grade
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 12 of 15
7C � 13
IIIIArterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 50 feet for each algebraic
percent difference in grade
Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 50 feet for each algebraic
percent difference in grade
Local Street(residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer
SECTION 34. Paragraph C, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of
Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows:
Double fronted residential lots shall not be allowed. However, lots which are backed
up to an arterial street shall be allowed when there is no access allowed from these
lots to the arterial street. Access may also be limited to collector streets for lots
which have double frontage.
SECTION 35. Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects
or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance
• shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 36. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the
City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with
the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are
hereby repealed.
SECTION 37. It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases,clauses,sentences,
paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 13 of 15
7C- 13
• decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 38. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of
• the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 39. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this
ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative
provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without
further proof than the production thereof.
SECTION 40. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIISUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 14 of 15
-7C- ItF
0 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF
, 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF
, 1997.
MAYOR
SATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
Date:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT"\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 15 of 15
City of Southlake,Texas -- -
• MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Chris Carpenter, Planner
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 483-F - Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance - Park Dedication
Section: SECOND READING
Attached you will find a proposed ordinance revising the entirety of Section 7 of Subdivision
Ordinance No. 483. This draft reflects a combination of recommendations by both the Park Board
(during their March meeting) and the Planning and Zoning Commission(during hearings on May
1 and May 8), language suggested by the City Attorney, and the motion made to approve during the
first reading at City Council on May 27.
Please note that the text depicting the approval of the first reading as stated in the motion by
Councilmember Harris is in redline text, and any language it replaced is in strikcout tcxt. Any
0 modifications made by staff to clarify language subsequent to the first reading is in italic redline and
italic strikeout text, and is subject to Council discussion, of course.
Also attached are research graphics, as requested by the mayor, depicting alternative dedication
amounts which would have been attributed to several existing subdivisions had they been submitted
under this proposed park dedication ordinance.
Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. If I can be
of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call 481-5581, Ext. 866.
CLC\cic
cc: Debra Drayovitch, Fielding, Barrett and Taylor
Kim Lenoir, Parks and Recreation Director
Sherry Berman, Park Board
Greg Last, Community Development Director
•
7tt
• 1
ORDINANCE NO. 483-F
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; REVISING THE
ENTIRETY OF ARTICLE VII, PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION
REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for
• the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to provide for adequate land
for parks, recreation and open space, it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend
Ordinance No. 483, to authorize the appropriate park land dedication requirements, or facilities,
or improvements, or fees in lieu of said dedication requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with
respect to the amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE:
SECTION 1. Article VII of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision
Ordinance, as amended, is amended in its entirety and replaced by the following text:
•
• 2
ARTICLE VII
PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
1 7.01 PURPOSE AND INTENT: The requirements for open space, park and recreational areas
2 contained in this section are intended to ensure that there will be sufficient land dedicated
3 or otherwise set aside to meet the demand and need of the future residents for open space and
4 parks. In determining the size, shape and quality of open space and parks areas that should
5 be set aside and reserved in the manner set out in this section, the City has considered the
6 projected growth in population and development within the municipality and the amount of
7 open space and park and recreational facilities needed to accommodate such growth as stated
8 in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan.
9
10 7.02 APPLICABILITY:
A. Unplatted Property: This section, as amended, applies to all property for which a
12 final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval, unless otherwise
13 noted herein.
14 B. Exempt Property: Any tract or lot occupied by an existing residential dwelling unit
15 at the time of adoption of this ordinance shall be exempt from the dedication
16 requirements of this section herein if the residential dwelling remains on the lot. This
17 exemption pertains only to the tract or lot with the existing residential dwelling. Any
18 additional lots created by further subdivision of the property shall be subject to the
19 requirements herein.
20 C. Date of Assessment: All requirements contained in this section shall be assessed at
21 the time of approval of the final plat of any applicable property.
22
23
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF \PARK_DED\CC_2ND.WPD
• 3
1 7.03 LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS:
2 A. General: Land dedication requirements herein are based on the City's adopted Land
3 Use Plan and the Parks Recreation& Open Space Master Plan. It is within the sole
4 discretion of the City to require a developer to provide the land dedication
5 requirements herein with the development plan, concept plan, preliminary plat, final
6 plat or other appropriate development submittal.
7 1. Residential Developments: Based on the population projected to reside in
8 the City of Southlake and the stated desire in the Parks,Recreation,and Open
9 Space Master Plan adopted by the City Council to provide 21 acres of park
10 land for every 1,000 residents in an ultimate condition,park land meeting the
11 requirements contained within this section shall be dedicated to the City at
12 a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every twenty-five (25) residential
13 dwelling units or prorated portion thereof
• 2. Non-Residential Developments: Although non-residential development
15 does not generate residential occupancies per se,it does create environmental
16 impacts which may negatively affect the living environment of the
17 community. These impacts may be ameliorated or eliminated by providing
18 park or open space areas which buffer adjoining land uses, prevent undue
19 concentration of paved areas, allow for the reasonable dissipation of
20 automotive exhaust fumes, provide natural buffers to the spread of fire or
21 explosion, and provide separation of lighting, waste disposal, and noise by-
22 products of non-residential operations and activities from adjacent residential
23 areas. The City has therefore determined that non-residential developments
24 must provide dedicated parks and/or reserved open space at a ratio of one (1)
25 acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of
26 development or prorated portion thereof.
27 3. Off-site Dedications: A developer may dedicate the required park land for
• a development at another location owned by the same developer within the
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK_DED\CC_2ND.W PD
• 4
1 City with the consent of the City, provided that the off-site land dedication
2 is in accordance with this section.
3 B. Transfers and Credits for Prior Dedications, Fees and Gifts: In considering the
4 amount of land dedication required of a proposed development, the City may, at its
5 discretion, apply former dedications which were in excess of the requirement at that
6 time to current or future dedication requirements of the same owner/applicant. A
7 dedication or cash payment in lieu of dedication made prior to the passage of this
8 Ordinance shall be controlled by the provisions of the ordinance in effect at the time
9 such obligation arose, provided the final plat has been submitted to the City for
10 approval prior to the passage of this Ordinance. At the discretion of the City, any
11 former gift of land to the municipality may be credited under the terms of the current
12 Ordinance toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of
13 such lands.
•
15 7.04 CHARACTERISTICS OF PARKLAND:
16 A. General: The Park Board shall annually recommend to the City Council a summary
17 of the character of dedicated park land most desirable in meeting the objectives of the
18 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. These characteristics shall be
19 provided in an abbreviated written report to all elected and appointed officials, city
20 staff, and the development community, and shall be placed in Appendix 11 of this
21 ordinance. In determining whether to accept or refuse the dedication of park lands,
22 fees, facilities or a combination thereof as outlined in section 7.05 below, the Park
23 Board and City Council shall consider this written report as a guideline for such
24 decisions.
25
26
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
o
• 5
1 7.05 ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION: In any case where a dedication is required,
2 the City shall have the right to accept the dedication as submitted for approval, or in the
3 alternative, to refuse dedication of the same, and in lieu thereof to require payment of cash
4 under the formula contained in this Section or to allow the developer to construct recreation
5 or park improvements. The City may permit a combination of dedication, improvements and
6 fees to be used to fulfill this requirement.
7 A. Fee Payment Alternative:
8 1. Approval of Fee Payment Alternative: The City Council shall, upon
9 recommendation of the Park Board, determine the acceptability of a
10 developer's payment of fees in lieu of the land dedication requirement of this
11 section.
12 2. Calculation of Fees: The City Council shall annually establish an acreage
13 land value cost figure to be used in calculating park fees. This determination
shall be based on a reasonable study and investigation performed annually,
15 and may be performed by an independent registered land appraisal firm as to
16 the average fair market value, as opposed to tax value, of acreage in the City.
17 This figure shall be the acreage cost under which all park fees are calculated
18 for the fiscal year.
19 a. Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: Park land dedication is required of
20 all residential developments. Upon determination that a hardship to
21 the dedication of park land exists, the City Council may consider a
22 variance or waiver to the land dedication requirements herein,
23 allowing the developer to acquire land of an equal value in other areas
24 designated by the City, or, in the alternative, allowing the developer
25 to pay the equivalent of the cost of land in their subdivision based on
26
27 the determined cost of one (1) acre of land
divided by twenty-five(25),for a resulting fee per residential dwelling
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
• 6
1 unit.
2 b. Non-Residential Development Fees:The fee payment alternative for
3 non-residential development shall be calculated by dividing the
4 determined cost of one (1) acre of land by fifty (50), for a resulting
5 fee per non-residential acre cost, or prorated portion thereof. In the
6 event the non-residential development is less than fifty(50) acres,the
7 total acreage, net of perimeter right-of-way dedications, shall be
8 divided by 50 to determine the prorated fee payment.
9 3. Collection of Fees: No building permit shall be issued nor shall any
10 construction be allowed to begin until payment of any fees required by this
11 section has been made.
12 B. Physical or Equipment Improvements to Parks
13 1. Compatibility with Park Master Plan: A developer may have the option
• of improving existing facilities within municipal parks or improving
15 dedicated park land in lieu of park land dedication or payment of cash,based
16 on recommendations made in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master
17 Plan. Should any of these options be exercised, the municipality and the
18 developer shall, prior to initiation of work on such improvements, enter into
19 an agreement for credit of expenses for authorized park improvements. In no
20 case shall the municipality be required to reimburse the developer if he
21 chooses to improve parklands at an amount greater than required. Such a
22 proposed agreement to provide facility improvements in lieu of dedication
23 shall be submitted in writing with the application for any required Concept
24 Plan or Site Plan. In the event that no Concept Plan or Site Plan is required,
25 the agreement shall be submitted with the application for the preliminary plat.
26
27 7.06 PRIVATE PARKS: If a developer desires to incorporate private park, recreation or open
• space areas or amenities within his development, he may request limited credit for these
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
11 .77
• 7
1 facilities against his public open space dedication requirements. A developer may request
2 credit for any private park, recreation or open space area, but such private park, recreation
3 or open space amenities may never satisfy more than 25%50% of the total park and open
4 space dedication requirement. Semi-public park areas acceptable to the City may be given
5 credit toward required park dedication requirements not to exceed 50%of the total dedication
6 requirement.
7
8 7.07 APPROVAL PROCESS:
9 A. Land Dedications :
10 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Director of Parks and Recreation or
11 their designee shall may report to the Park Board regarding any park land
12 dedication issues arising from development applications submitted to the City
13 for approval.The Park Board may then make a formal recommendation to the
• Planning and Zoning Commission to accept or refuse any proposed dedicated
15 park land prior to the Commission's action on the development.
16 2. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and
17 Zoning Commission shall consider the recommendation of the Park Board in
18 determining the acceptability of any land dedications proposed on any
19 development. The Commission recommendation shall then be forwarded to
20 the City Council for final approval where applicable.
21 3. Final Plat Dedications: Where review of development applications has
22 resulted in the City's desire for land dedication, such land dedication shall be
23 shown on a final plat and shall contain a clear fee simple dedication of that
24 land to the City.
25 B. Fee Payments in Lieu of Dedication and/or Facilities Improvements:
26 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Park Board shall make a formal
27 recommendation to the City Council as to the acceptability of any proposed
alternatives to park land dedication.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
• 8
1 2. City Council Consideration: Upon receiving a formal recommendation
2 from the Park Board,the City Council shall enter into an agreement with the
3 developer for the provision of dedicated park land, fees in lieu of dedication,
4 facilities construction or improvement, or a combination thereof as outlined
5 below.
6 a. Developer's Agreements: Developer's Agreements between the City
7 and the developer shall include the following requirements as
8 applicable:
9 (1) Boundary Corners Established: Each corner of the park
10 land to be dedicated shall be permanently monumented with
11 3/4" iron pins set in concrete. These shall be located and
12 identified on a recordable plat or land survey completed by a
13 land surveyor registered in the State of Texas and provided to
411 the City by the Owner and/or Developer.
15 (2) Utility Extensions to Park: A minimum size of 6" water
16 main and sanitary sewer, where available, shall be extended
17 to the park, in location(s) specified by the Director of Public
18 Works.
19 (3) Short-term Maintenance: The Owner and/or Developer
20 agree that no construction materials shall be disposed of or
21 deposited within the park by its contractor, subcontractors,
22 employees or agents at any time while the subdivision is
23 being built. If materials are deposited or disposed of within
24 the park, the Owner and/or Developer shall be required to
25 remove these materials within 72 hours of written notice by
26 the City. Before the City accepts this land, the Developer
27 shall remove all trash and dead trees.
0
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
7b- T
• 9
1 7.08 USE OF FUNDS:
2 A. Fund Established: Funds received by the City pursuant to this Section will be
3 deposited in a special fund dedicated to the accumulation of monies required by this
4 section.
5 B. Permitted Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may be expended only for the
6 purchase, lease, or other acquisition of park and open space areas by the City of
7 Southlake, the improvement and site preparation of such areas and sites, the
8 extension of utilities to or within such sites, the installation of landscaping, play
9 equipment or recreation improvements on such sites, and/or attendant engineering
10 and planning costs associated with such park development.
11 C. Inappropriate Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may not be utilized for
12 any other general business activity of the City or for maintenance of park facilities.
13 D. Authorization for Use of Funds: All expenditures from this fund shall be made in
• accordance with the City's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan and shall
15 be approved by the City Council after a formal recommendation of the Park Board.
•
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
7D -rD
S 10
1 These appendices are not considered a part of this ordinance and may be revised or updated as necessary by the City Staff.
2
3 APPENDIX 11
4 Guidelines for Park Land Dedication
5 (Approved by Park Board 5/12/97)
6
7 A. Land dedication or otherwise set aside for open space and park and recreational areas shall be of
8 such size, dimensions, topography and general character as is reasonably required for the type of
9 use necessary to meet the demand and need of future residents, e.g., open space, linear space,
10 trails, active recreation for team or individual sports, playground, etc.
11
12 B. Natural areas or flood plains which provide unique opportunities may be included in areas
13 dedicated or otherwise set aside or reserved for open space or linear greenbelts. In considering
14 any area for dedication which does not meet the standards of this ordinance and where the
15 ordinance allows the municipality to employ its discretion, the following may be considered:
16
17 1. Preserve area of unique natural beauty, area possessing unique natural features, or other
18 ecologically valuable areas.
19
20 2. Facilities may be developed in partial fulfillment of required parkland dedication.
2
3. Whether the area is proposed to be contiguous to an existing or proposed school site.
24 4. A combination of land dedication and fees paid in lieu of a portion of the land dedication.
25
26 5. Where developments are contiguous, two or more required dedications may be combined
27 to form a single, viable park area.
28
29 6. Acreage dedication which would expand existing parks or recreation facilities.
30
31 7. An applicant may transfer the required parkland in a subdivision to another location owned
32 by the same applicant within the City of Southlake with the consent of the City Council.
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
'ib, il
•
f
11
2 SECTION 2 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
3 refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance
4 shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a
5 violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
6
7 SECTION 3 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the
8 City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with
9 the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances
10 are hereby repealed.
11
12 SECTION 4 It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences,
13 paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence,
14 paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or
15 decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
16 remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same
17 would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any
18 such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
19
0 SECTION 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
22 for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
23 if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
24 of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
25 official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by
26 Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
27
28 SECTION 6 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this
29 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative
30 provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without
31 further proof than the production thereof.
32
33 SECTION 7 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
34 and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
35
36
37
38
39
4
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
•
• 12
1 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF
2 , 1997.
3
4
5
6 MAYOR
7
8 ATTEST:
9
10
11 CITY SECRETARY
12
13
14
15 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF
16 , 1997.
•
19
20 MAYOR
21
22 ATTEST:
23
24
25 CITY SECRETARY
26
27
28
29 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
30
31
32 City Attorney
33
34 Date:
35
36 ADOPTED:
37
• EFFECTIVE:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD
1\)'- �3
0 Park Land Dedication Graphic Exhibit
The chart below and attached graphic mark-ups of selected plats are illustrations of what park land
areas would be required under the proposed Ordinance 483-F, as compared to the currently adopted
ordinance. The required dedication amounts are indicated as follows: land required under the current
ordinance is solid black, and the additional land required by the proposed ordinance is shown in
diagonal line hatching. Please be aware that these plats were copied from reductions, and their
graphic scales may differ.
Since the residential park land dedication is a function of number of dwelling units and not gross
acreage (as is the non-residential requirement), it can be deduced that the greater the density (or
number of dwelling units per acre), the greater the park land dedication requirement would be
regardless of the gross acreage. The following chart and exhibit reveal this circumstance.
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres)
Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25
d.u. d.u.
Timarron Village I 35 PUD 14.807 .70 1.40
• The Woods 8 SF-lA 17.082 .16 .32
Myers Meadow III 96 PUD 44.184 1.90 3.80
Harrell Place* 6 SF-1A/ 5.844 .12 .24
SF-30
Meadow Ridge 58 SF-20 37.416 1.15 2.30
* Not a plat, but a project which was mentioned by the Council as relevant to the discussion.
S
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK_DED\EX H IB IT.W PD
• 7 •
W
,,I,
�-:. S 6720'2i E - 197.0E
bm E. S 6426'21- E-197.9E
10621 17656 STREET a t��
2 '7e.e,1oe.L� vat 4 !r
q- 1' 1" oo' s,
1C 1215 v ,-wow.
n t- 4'
15 04?5'54. E _ CV
1 1 123''3 i�i`�I
O 1 123.0E, W` I,. B4..7.0fr.SIX.*.*.dar.
'1- 100 30 0 100
76 8 �I ,0 iiMiir , -
Z 10424 9 'ro„ f-'S -
6'UE. VI •
, r SCALE IN FEET
I I I..Ipp•
- °1
lax a2
27
15 U s..,)1.
20,SAT n, 1.
C. `S1iPJ5'n'Y�' i
53 1N t+�l.. ,i 1 101.37( .
229.68 S 6753'Sa' C ' \'`,v.c. rF `ty, ( 6.s.7o
- - 170.50 11
r R Oo21'oe' E I J 12o.se n q ,i55
5•UL 110.64 1tn5)4 6( 25 25 J I -� \' '� 10 / ��'
I--to'UE 1_ u.` 1 i 11 0 E 50 n or 0 :��\ E " 5� /
= m 1J eie�� zai ��aa ,.,, ` I'k.o.w. 6s•ur w'-I •
1D�5�V v yg q'/
$ u )0909 �i •/QP.L1-5mJ g 10 IQ_z 115 /
u (' Q 7 )M29 SrS< r�,
BLOCK 152 ' STREET D' j = 8 I +� t 7 e
I3110972.5.54... g ;,? 6'U.L ti s
t.1 I n'.„fit : S 6435'64.E-111.1E E) , \ 16 ^�
78 I gg 63;;TT: 0y1-' l L. S°c.J /.r 1
>E 47•„5D \ ,00.L7 1~ to -, ,,S. `S.... 1 r / /
w 8 t
1 I toolool ff 11 8 AA 8 Ir,oe9oo a 18 .d •ti .,S \7x� /
o ,.NL a xl ! 12000 I S 6147.00 C +M1yt' 'S R ;Y` /
r
N "'8 ,5+u sr </4�se4)s's.'>y t47.00 g .e v��/ ,sees r lam. V �' L ""` °�7
y F �. ." +° S 64J5'St• E J 1 /,F,\2 j' . 2 r
Sony W__54---eo.U9_`I' o /' ` F
o I i 150.00 10,1 1-� 3 .-- /'b P V s 2 PROJECT � 4
} R� - ---=--- _13.c- -BLOCK 55 .' 12930 Sr /., 50.3 ,�` 6 t o yr LL)CATIO }
COURT • - 8 9 •s 8 r.2 7.
1 6. s 3J•nr /: W 7;r\,+7r�„ -) u 2 PC6Li aw s
--[--C ,L 51C E `" 1-i,6 8 3_ 7 1IIa 6 i" 'as.s,-.1.; �1.i 1,KT ,10.1 sr $ �/ t
I
1 xQ 1Q weeisi 1..29vg 5 ;I.,' • r, ti(r 944 VI 1 •C a17
Ia. ev t 7000D - 2s•I n,`,.n2n v 75.aL�L---= 3„.s,...ei, CA `1,5111,st.` l 1' I w
' (4 • rzp.00 19 y.(.145.00 25'25 �..
„,_
✓ 'v �S `i ^, S°-'- i I N e4)s'st•w-600l+n t9 Ce '
...4 111 6500 76,
6-\ :� $ -24. 5`.se.a, as , stm a6.00 -TQl(w naa ai.' tt 7
200.E 0 610 LOCATION MAP
�$ �.Y° . . .^ I a a �n (N.T.s)
*9 's ' •"1 7 °A E ' k 1 5 . '3,--3 R 2 ` -""'z C.G.
O '� „°'a „m,Y
-0L�t` 3'L' 'r '6 11271 5r g-I10.4 sr-Li 1 Y„9,9 4 g'3'U.L �L7 •
BLOCK 52 m00 z `��
• N 9945'0K' W -240.67 ?I 6T31'5C w - 477.97
10'U.L Ivni 3M-202.PC.25 P.O.B.
A
FINAL PLAT
OF
TIMARRON ADDITION
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) VILLAGE 0 - WEST
Om (IF" 711E
Units O.YI. KNIGHT SURY(Y. AHSTRACT FIE. 899
@ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 IN
711E
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IAFRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
d.u. d.u. 14.807 ACRES / 35 LOTS
OWMER/DE`.uoil.R; mitRi%Gti I./.':i. ,,,,,, ,,pATNJN
Timarron Village I 35 PUD 14.807 .70 1.40 `0L' L QUIT:;41,,P 117LCV/4':
IR\9N6. TEXAS 1T,C952..
- (i1.1) 791-T339
Lt BLOCK I CZ' WINDSOR FOREST 0 I • _1
ca~oCn W PHASE'I • E 11 •fUOI•100.••H BLOC II S VISTA TR IL COUNTRY ESTATES VOL.3B8.17O,•PG.74 !IIS
L.388-204,PG.42
....•. , .•n VOL.308-98, PG.16 BLOCI( IZOIO 9 a t IT 31J- C� CITY Of sILLLER --CITY Of SOUTNLANL�'IFLORENCE — ROAD------.-- L )!,eL«s•I
.....f or:Itsl slut -^} -..__.—_ -- NB9•s2 oo•EIS--eo----- T I
0 SH ACNE/O[O.C•1!p!OR RIGMr-Or-•+•. --1.— Vi..M/.I I
FOND SCRIP TIO! I/t' 1 r _ --_-__ __ -_ __ _ -- -_- __ J
• ------200.00 188.00'-- ''2 187.50'- 1523.J2 2SS 12'- - - -230.15 M•Rw
d. �- �17f,.D -- 184.50- I ...es 1 a.•I
--
--- ..- ......-____ sili N89.34 24 E • r n7{ I
40� BUILDING LINE f
Li- /2
420 'r+I1
r n f
Q • N LGt 1 O N Oi O n' N W I O +1
1.500 AC. m � • F. ,. IQ.I
Q m
O W ` W
Z 89'3424 E 279.68 Q 'u •'0 "' Lot 7 e Lot 8 0 - CwrT. MOOR(
O o Lot 3 W Lot 4 Lot 5 n Lo b
Cr) •O / •.p .o ,n A J n I,I v1.7130,r[.)la
BLOCK 3 X ZI ?/ •.� 2.150 AC. -„, 2.024 AC. H 2.022 AC. :v 2.8OI IC, -N 2.000 AC. N 2.S00 AC. j�,O I
N O
o
ARABIAN HORSE COUNTRY ADDITION W I '7/ N O —
. „ „ N I N
VOL.388-124,PG 27 0_ �/ r IA 0 �^ „ 3 I b vo.w MANr1A
1 I / Lot 2 A T
•..Weil,M.{of
Q
11 1.S00 AC. N O I Y' I
1 .O
1 I I`
.__. )
2�
,2 I
s 283.15 20001 188.00 ••4.47 183.04 259.•iY IB4,SI 229.94 nr• ROKRT CARru
C _ - -- ------.- 589.53.(0.: : :'T
_ 856.5 —~- a_—_--_ç
4 ( SMc Vi vw f..[ i0uslun (sY 1 ,1121
vol naa, LOT I J J FRES NOUR NO.521 ADDITION y4•
CAB.A, SLIDE 1825 i BLOf.)3 DITION /Z
Xi I I M•ai• covet Aa(i
NE-71-
Vq. 388-93,PG.3 /��1... I I I vLassq ry.n)2
11 . 2)
Ij III
-- — 1• I • CUME+�RLAND TRAIL
' • IounuTr s /41
( DRAINAGE[stir 1 I 641 urso.r..»s
W IIIY
ry
• Y�„ THE WOODS
Cl O •7
r . V. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN
s~,jlu a TAR RANT COUNTY,TEXAS,BEING A TRACT IN THE
'�°(
.
J.J.FRESHOUR SURVEY ABSTRACT NO.521
c 4 B LOTS
4
17.082 Ac.
o so zoo
k-1-.•f{,.----',--- I August 22, 1996
c.•ri.,C : . in 1r11
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres)
Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25
d•u. d.u.
The Woods 8 SF-1 A 17.082 .16 ,: .32
-fir -----,04-`— rut-. =j — r==
n r= ,.a.o== FL- ,lam==-j=---ts b�-1-=,-o -.- ro3'—- - -1--
• . mPR1YAIf OPEN SPACE/5 gi
�1, t oo / ,,
'�• art/sr. r .. rI war r.r. 'Y d
ram. 'BR Lw H'R l,.v,i.r p^ .,..so�.r. 7 tuav9.r p'R / 51 •
Jail.r..r ,�' ® i;� , E'el.i 'Ts',1._1 'Js q v e `��_ ,�,
■y a` �J'o'_�—'RN. _ wm' j. ._.:,O+V __1-12r,P.-_ A - ,
8'
r ° BSI— REDWING— - �, DRIVE - —1 s
Q HB?
°"' ® imiT 1�81'-r" -1-Bm 1_ — I _6t6'�.z..'—I 1 /lrno xr. ^� tre,el 1 s t
„` I I ynl 0 50 a 100 200
,'��/�73 _ SCALE : 1' = 100'
11
. I w•Ic 7? ,o 2 MNS..r. ...RV .r.g, 1400 ff. aco.r. .:-ir. $,f
. ,,t. I & plueoi.r� Im• Arm r.r,
hst
n.u —mnsesn,ar • i —w — j1 $ � n ~�i
c.4.. ``41:451Eir. 1.RRt/,.0.' 1/4W 141.4'f.r.11 RB ,ONf.y '7 (86 B! x
I-4, 'b'C"i .�.§: 49,.b` ; 51 t-271 53 '�^--KB.�Y 1:•_11 ,u+fv s r.'ti ',
�'h� p Wort s.r. laa,t.r, � I �
ta<.ttiur 35 LIv �' �. 4�' 8 63 ' +m 1L:_" '
o xni r.r. .y® rm,.r. i�_�0.4? •® y+_ vga�sl7. - ,my+rr �- um- w
lyY S MEADOW
P11A5E lil,tu.:i: ;--u"� -4 � � 1 (8 ' S� �$
/151n s.r. 9-1-
�i ls,r s.r. 1 �, lwtt.r.
IMMO
REC'� JUN 2j {4.1 A r.;.I (� de: ./ — f�sd y V
ut.
LOTS
.-� la ,a,s r. tAei 'fj _ iLSB9 73,34 F AJ7.41 y
-`•1- - 96 I..1/1J 40
R 9YY__I A;aill \ _Q/,
.411.1 v1 F m' o � • rr. cut.
BJ.FOSTER SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.519 5 m3s.r. 5� • § s 5s s° gyp°r. �'
IMAM..TIN I , ' 2 1.O s.r. 44 '" v y 87 't'•.'\ h4\
J mm. _
CITY OF SOUTIQ.AE$TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS -,- -- -n Q--- 9-V1 \\y lue t.r r� •�.�S
ll.,01/w ---i R p I 1 .'�AP••• •• 7� tn' 57 •3 ,e t s.r. //e `ti :,c
32 �,�c.
bm e �a fi / j1 e 1 IR
id F V �� �/ ? ,tertrp
A89 '23 F 7Q334• °•=-S 31 r / / 11 15 �$.4 I:..
u,.,Sr, 9Q r ,31P1t s.r. ��fdset,P-0 I �.A•
-- -- --—IIT--=dSm�-13'yi.sr�m-=r��Sm==1—trim= 1 '`/ '/R�y Ea /ii ', 13 y.� ' 4I
•I y _wommv / ,uoss.r. dµ41. .,,aos.r.> > Si
.S t• ?5 e a .e n r� - i`\- • "1 f +� Ap/1:
�' ,azo t.r. B 26 77 B 28 7 29 „..,.,1---
.,U / $ 17 4 �•�i 'fly.' k `CSC
`� 1 ✓/ 1/1Dlfr. y ,>•I/r.r. »yl fl. pl- ImM ir.p Q rl.s.r.1 G' I O '`y ,�, "r. ''� b ,.n.12 s.r. \.' j t �'„' �.
•
,sa s.r. " -"'I = iu1r-1.__sam" 11� esm' _I vas 11 °,$' J ' _ /�o s' su. ,.h13 ss.r. $1 1',�/ '' a+ y /� 'Q 01 \k,_
®— — m�';F — POS g °" _i€T 1 't'� a,ry9.r. a Jam'a m `�1 !0 7. /\' .- /e Joni a 1,o
s� /�$3�m'"1�;' h�7 LYJtb7✓�r� „1 f ;,m:�t.r. 0 e a ti
o, 73 ,. z ,/ sm, • os
' �1 't 135.Cb 5 •- el. Y� w LO'
,lws.r.� n-,1. w' I?, ZI 9 y � 9 t y� • IB
,� ` 1•' r' E �& Z! x 7? lsons.r. a o�"'- a,�,fr, si•'�` 1pt.r.
15*` 8 R • Q Inv r.r, ZJ ,�,',sae t r. ss $
gr 1 �. ^ E1LOIX B� B 3 sut � N^ r�fs.•11, y�/�. B �a y , y �% �
p J l L 1ml s.r. • ��`{ a/
o.'' ?? 5 ?1 ij� c't7 19 � ao_.S 4� ate' -_ •� J3,,p ,1� e o su.�3"`' / '\ /.1� 1a,.tr. tY"'� �.fi4
�,yFq,,S�t.r. ,.,,tr. Jae fr. ,sw t.r. $$��..l�j 4Y 71'- ^' �Qv, L@e?.— u � J' 7�(N• '�• \f` 4 y ; k
r'am StJy V?JrE 44f W Z��.Q7 �_,Ao z^ '$8-� �5'� � `� S���'j5�� _e4j0'� ` .�y�,wl�s.r.9'• �{A
( (( u+ {.[[',"fig' 1\/ ‘
._ ,i `' 'F.-1 r. ^� till ! - Y;^� 1 / -i"' -'2., 1 13 Fyn l'
III �'{ t%y
Ls ,., 11 �a
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land(acres) ��'•'""tr "may .
Units ', ''=�^' 3j ( /
@ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./255 ' " "�
d.u. .d.u.
Myers Meadow III 96 I)UD 44.184 I.90 3.80
P95 Tnrs- I i I •;
,.0'um_m_[t..1. / - i V ."' I i.
of
/ b ZONNG // _ t{' •
, R I
i' / / ' tIs la
LOT 1•LLOCK 2 . / / / /R0o(w'E ETEDENTARY 5a4o \ \ I^, g'�
0
V.SIA IAAllS AOOOION
VOL. •
]e.-95.IG.) ♦ / / / / // I ( I Ya.E5e11�•PG,501/ - I
PR.T.C.f. / J I I I \ D.R.T.C.T. I .---' I L _-
POINT OF j� .ter' — — —
COMMENCING {
—p ) • is s'sELL,D VOL.. 10957, C. 1767 D1 T.C.T y 7 ae�J 1 µ
---���111 ✓a. �9'. i E E'E 1Z81E '
11CIMNARON TRJ • ..w / / •2s' 220.51 9].h' 9).17' 19]���-__I__19330' I� \ —I r LOCATION MAP
PuOUC R-O-w � ,.,��.3 II �_ `�y�i�—� ______\___ -- '�- xDc.tn/E� — T _ a�D,•-`���lll' I y \.
Y •
.1LI•� ]2.45 Aryl. \ �' 8\ \ \ \ oco.c.T6 ` / / f— '+1_ I d� _ \ ` naoa m.r a91.
0.7.2«. '�8 f \ \ 1. 7'/ i . . i°( � 14 i0T. BLOCK 1
Y 1so..i�ce • . 10.0•�.c\ 8 \ Ij
Stfi aeuuwoR! . 9°4--wl.»e-Iel.PS e F ,R• . ' . w . o.". I I a009 00 \ \ •
;va�., ti .�S�7 LL a PROP TY
01 / Y 11115.Po.117 4"P - 'AG F_ Z /•
fV : Jo,'
o: POINT F D i.t.T. O \ -. - - 1 0 17n. LTAi
—
_ / BEGINNING 'A�G�a'1�1/�tc,r1g S \•sFQ• �� 1p / .` 1 I I e100'Vil.[SMT. ZVI` -.. 1 I' �_� 19].1 71.1.7 :".•- y ��1? � 7e 17TL EaR. 1_,,,„., _
O1g700b�0 31fE i � 18�Y� 52�9.8 �` • —�o ' 1—
Im 7 eo.la' 99.9T' i' ; i I I I J /� ZONNG ry e.
41...., v. Ira I.2PEARSON LANE�jip.f.C.T. 'I I 1 I I I I I I /r il / e ,1 .O7).1attK 1 I I 11701
I ..-, p__, I CYNNtRON ACRES
N56 I 1. I I I I I _,I I I i '1' // / /a / 1 - vR.T.C.T.LOT 0 ol_308,111,PG 11 I I
• G' ^ .wo.O.... on r IMAM'
Ai
PT LANE A11011K7M •`••�0 I I "I I i I g g / • g W.. .n r..r
V.)ee-170.P.22/.R.T.C.T. I ICU
/ Y 'Tie+
1 7 1.Ai tt b, � A
.�,A. �: 5, �n ��o I� I ��o % ��a �o ��o I� I
TZ :5D1t LAKE AOOTIION ZONNG I g ni J f
V.]M-tra P.zz PAT.C.T. I LOT 2.RDCK,
1 j 4 I - 9 I/ I I l• y CY M"T ACRES I
1 S. ..7...T.
RLOT a I 'AG' I
I+f71R5d1 1ANE xKRT1DN
V.1m-Ira P.22►.R.T.C.r. Zj
4-� .1• - - •
—I I I I
'-'~ ,OE ZONING - I LOT I.BLOCK I
VK_\� CA/M.ARON ACRES
.OT) LOT 1.B-1e1.PG.5
I 'AG' LOTPEA 3 LANE ADQiKW I 1
ZONING
t V.)ee-17Q I.22/R.1.C.T. I I ( I ; \ I
LVIW\V
I
— 11 1 . ..�- II
I �, L_ j+ ]5.0.OMN.S VR ESYT. .-.�
.-Jlr
I + �.J.-���
I
PONR-0 L-wANE _
CITY QF SOHW(UTE __ — -
—p1Y OF KE.LE
CONCEPT PLAN
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) LOTS ,bLOCK 1,
Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 HARRELL
PLACE
d.u. d.u. BEING 5.8438 ACRES OF LAND IN THE
J.G. ALLEN SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 18
CITY OF SOLVVLA0RAANT COUNTY. TEXAS
Harrell Place* 6 SF-1 A/ 5.844 .12 .24
PREPARED FEBRUARY 20. 1997
SF-30 Le LandCon Inc.
* Not a plat, but a project which was mentioned by the Council as relevant to the discussion. `. Englneefe•arveyore•Plamers
2501 Prttlw Dr.BA*612 Poi wort,Tor.AA 7002-5100
►D.Boa IDO¢47,Fort Mort,Toms.70113-0247
(WI506-7066 PAR (WI 533-5067
Yl'11716 a aa•ae',l•l. 590.le r.r•arm.Mon 1 evs/' rte.PO* ,,.•rrm.R
• f11.«' a1.II .ww tll.al _ In.of .. •'` o.�. to
` '� .. 1. • ''l �r' 1. `III •J• O I r'� (Q •
1 T msee S.F. _ 21.173 Si. I ,�9.' 21 M7 L/. � 20.221 LA r: \ 20.3N tJ. �.0. �J.
/ • f N'«'d•I , * ..N«•d•r M.....d•f
I.Y.!7fi1• /N-yy o__I .Y. .:•tom • �a� 11 n
L1
k I r — ' Ir ADl. v�,.t .r,.oO t 'o; D i. .. R
r DDI I/'IDl. _
1 1 N.►70 V. 20.006 V. I xt.{GO sr.
mat L/.
p 1 p f •N'.l•t [II•«'d'I M*earl' —rwcw--- ^ —rw+
R 4r.)I Iw.00' I y. I 44,00 I �y R. i`l UOl f , VW'Mr
M•N'11• .I , �� {{{yyy {R.,•~.1 IR ca x0.002 V. 6 O V ,
1().10 * ® N 2,002 V. 5 p1 ti ! 20.002 LI. •• r 30.001 Lf. _
i e I C 9 , I OW.' V I wN'd•f_ .
a 84 M w•u'd•[ IK 07 : - 9 IN.00 i2i
I°^ Y !M•N'II'( I ISO.•• �I I Iw.00
R 'mar to y {�. Q 1 b s l
! Ir Dal. �©u 4 • u mGo2 v. d ? ■ moot u.
.4 4 g M , . k,k d m,uox Lr. 1 M w•«•d•(
f^ 43,1►5 Ll. a v. e x►.6►7 LI, R-w•«'e.g• I IK00' p 'ft.
0V' 2p,
L i 'o{I 7� ^\� I 11 /. I. I TI'1D / '..w1 q R.2.
4 11 i �1.w•N•II•r 1 \Ir®t ill tz " 4 ' IK OD'1OJ. . © I 6, O zo.®V. 1# ,/ l 1 r.Xo+m J
\ r I K II' 20,002 V. 1 •.
I� 24001 SF. m.002 LI.
'• © 1110.00 MM•ff•d•f /K00' Iw.OV' `'D)
M�
. Iw.N•
II DDl. 20.m►V. IK 0d I $ {• I yi'
pprry� 1 2b•xu/rafh © k Z 1' ® $ taoot Lr. ;1
p sa.D(fo:•0l. U l �21� i m.0.1]Si. 1 g m.00x S.F. III x4A0 LI. I m• 11 1 _ aII
`� •'1 '� Dal. Iw.00' I.
® 2a' rJIlD I1G LIK
• • ii M Dr« I�( «.of w.oa II r711
42,464 Lt. M$ i RS7 I7RIm I p•.r d'i"VI.N ' tie.u' Ri t.oo
ttk ff r_____....., rl.If' , '1 1rD.0000• 1p.'
6 r /Ix.(I' K N IL Oo' R I D
x4x37L►. 20 aJ.I N.Oc;1T1 ; 1 :
1• 1l D.O.t61/ � flm.001 Lr. 1.• . I Ili I- •
li. �w DDJ. 20,002i/. $ mAot Lr. 2o,oa2 L►. m.00t sr. LOT 21,1642 10.Ft I. I'_ t•.a•u'd'► t M IN«•d•( ..AL'.l- ` �"l+•,\v r1 �� t' O Iw.00 [ I«.00 \'Tartar-- \it DDI. 31 , or row 0...or•••oc-
• It
It
• ,Dr IDl. - ^ - 246x2 LI. W DDl.
IL
Ilk
pYi N, 2 Lr 20.111 aJ. 20D11u. 714 �Cjj�ryp�`4.. yIw d' pDDJ. 1 N.T.S.
•
W. I. g .la
D►e L Ir ADJ. 6 i 1 p DDI. ' 4 m g1Q V l •a { u'ODl. ; '. "i
IS l xaw V. II \ 'j,. ►5. I© ' V II
I< 30.310 L/. •I� IY •l. 20.110 SF. E ' sr RAJ.D...• qP II.ODl 21pe0 S.F. Ia• b
a/ �1s r-- Tw.3r— �i.ZT— 171787 Y : �ic"
if..rrm-Im $ $D•IS'tl'W /310.44'
vs-SR
451
Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) iIFINAL PLAT
SHOWING
Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 LOTS 1 THRU 25, BLOCK 1,
d.u. d.u. AND LOTS 1 THRU 35, BLOCK 2,
MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES
Meadow Ridge 58 SF-20 37.416 1.15 2.30
Lolly VI JVUU IIaF\c, IcAaJ
-A
STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA 96-132 PROJECT: Second Reading / Ordinance No. 480-222
Rezoning & Concept Plan Timarron
Commercial, Tract III
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner 1, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Concept Plan on property described as
approximately 200.822 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey,
Abstract No. 481,being Tracts 1, 1A1, 1 E, 2,2A, 2B, 2B 1 A,and
2C 1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049,
being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B 1, 3, 3 A, 3 C, 5, 5 C, and 5 D.
LOCATION: North of State Highway No. 1 14, east of North Carroll Ave.,
south of East Highland St., and west of North Kimball Ave.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
• District
REQUESTED ZONING:
(ORIGINAL REQUEST): "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a
Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS"
Community Service District, "0-1 " Office District, "0-2" Office
District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local
Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District,
"C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service
Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "I-I
"Light Industrial District, "I2" Heavy Industrial District, "HC"
Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08
acres)from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-IA" Single
Family District, "SF-30" Single Family District, and "MF-2"
Multiple Family Residential District.
AMENDED REQUEST: Same as above, but deleting "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial
District, "I-I" Light Industrial District,and"I-2" Heavy Industrial
District and amending the residential zoning category to exclude
MF-2 and adding "SF-20" Single Family Residential (see
attached letter).
•
• LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use(may include residential, office buildings, hotels,
and commercial and retail centers that serve local and
regional needs)
CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial(Same as in CS,0-1, 0-2, B-1, HC, MF-1, and
MF-2 districts)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Forty-one (41)
RESPONSES:
(ORIGINAL REQUEST) Ten (10) written responses were received from within the 200'
notification area:
• Michael A. Quinn, P.O. Box 92575, Southlake, opposed.
• John T. Knight, 650 Cherry Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092,
undecided. "This being such a broad request, I am not sure
how it will affect the value of my property or the quality of
life in my neighborhood."
• Steven E. and Katherine J. Cook 1981 E Highland, Southlake,
Texas 76092, opposed. See attached letter received Oct. 8,
1996, addressing protecting residential areas in Southlake,
• residential property values, increased traffic, resident
protection, and keeping East Highland residential.
• Robert P. Steele, 959 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas
76092, in favor.
• Hazel J Miller, 5213 McQuade St., Fort Worth, Texas 76117,
in favor.
• Jerry and Jacky Lawrence, 1901 E Highland, Southlake,
Texas 76092, opposed. See attached letter dated Oct. 10,
1996, addressing noise, water and air pollution, traffic on
Highland, and problems associated with a possible sports
stadium on Highway II 4.
• D/FW-Carroll Road Ltd, etal, PO Box 700876, San Antonio,
Texas 78270-0876, in favor. "It's been a long, long wait for
Southlake region investors!"
• Maria P. Cameron, 1776 E Highland St., Southlake, Texas
76092, opposed. See attached letter dated Oct. 11, 1996,
addressing the right-of-way on Highland Street and Carroll
ISD.
• Martin Rester, 600 Cherry Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed.
"I do not want to give permission for unlimited zoning next
to a residential area."
• • Harold Knight, 1 749 E. Highland St, Southlake, in favor. "I
am in favor of the request 'with the attached changes.' With
a
these changes, I support their request." (Please note that Mr.
• Knight has included a marked-up copy of a Zoning District
Summary sheet immediately following his hand-written
letter.)
Three (3) responses were received outside the 200' notification
area:
• James and Cecile Gardner, 1213 Ashmoore Ct., Southlake,
opposed. " ... we want to present to you, our desire for this
tract to maintain it's current zoning until, which time,
Timarron is prepared to come to the city with a legitimate and
specific Development Plan." See attached letter.
• David Edelen, 1203 Ashmore Ct., Southlake, opposed.
"With the broad range of categories and the limitless
number of"permitted uses"under the categories,and with
also a possibility of a land sale to a third party with no
partnering with Timarron,the residents have no protection
under the PUD that a satisfactory development will take
place." See attached letter.
• Margaret C. Burnette, 1002 Quail Run Road, Southlake,
in favor. "Quality commercial development with well
landscaped open space is what Southlake should strive
410
for." See attached letter.
Two(2)identical responses were received at Planning and Zoning
work session on December 12, 1996. ". . . the application as it
presently stands is unacceptable to us in many respects, and it
must be modified to make it more compatible with residential
living in order to obtain our acquiescence." See attached letter.
• Debbie and Roy Gutherie, 2412 Emerald Circle, Southlake.
• Don and Janet Rose, 1209 Ashmore Court, Southlake. See
letter for additional comments.
RESPONSES:
(AMENDED REQUEST) Nine(9)responses were received within the 200' notification
area:
• Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade St., Fort Worth, Texas 76117,
undecided.
• Michael A. Quinn, P.O. Box 92575, Southlake, opposed.
• Ann Hardin, 1991 E. Highland St., Southlake, opposed.
• Robert Steele, 959 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, in favor.
• Marie Eubanks, 1371 E. Highland St., Southlake, opposed.
"The property is too close to my house where we live. Too
• much noise. I would object to the traffic on Highland."
F -3
• Harold Knight, 1 749 E. Highland St, Southlake, opposed.
• "Because it includes manufacturing, repair, services, taverns,
clubs,and used merchandise sales and other uses that I do not
want located next to my property; however I would be in
favor of the request if it was modified to eliminate those uses
that I have marked through on the attached Summary of
Zoning District Symbol and Permitted Uses." See attached
list.
• Steven E. and Katherine J. Cook 1981 E Highland,
Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. Residents states CS,
0-1, and 0-2 uses that they would like omitted. See
attached letter.
• Boyd and Susan Herndon, 1201 Ashmore Court,
Southlake, opposed. Residents state concerns with safety
on E. Highland Street,building heights and setbacks. See
attached letter.
• Dale Crane, 3625 N. Hall St., Suite 620, Dallas, Texas.
Dale Crane and Debbie Gutherie on behalf of E.
Highland, Sunshine Lane, and Stanhope residents, offers
suggestions regarding the enlargement of parcel A,
increasing setbacks in parcel A to 300',and eliminating all
manufacturing uses. See attached letter.
• Seven responses were received(7)
p cei ed outside the 200'
notification area:
• Dan and Carla Hemyari, 550 Cherry Lane, P.O. Box
92605, Southlake,opposed. Resident states concerns with
property values, traffic, uses in section C, drainage, and
an increase in crime. See attached letter.
• B. Dennis King, 205 Manor Place, Southlake, opposed.
Resident states that, ". . . PUD's were never intended to be a
substitute for good land use planning." Resident also states
that ". . . Westwood should speak specifically to its plans for
the property . . ." See attached letter.
• Gerald Hodges, 1210 Ashmore Court, Southlake, opposed.
One petition was received from Grapevine residents with
sixteen (16) signatures, all opposed. See attached copy of
petition.
Gerald and Karen Hodges, 1210 Ashmore Court,
Southlake, opposed. Resident asks that they be advised
on the following issues: street access and egress,the DFW
Airport noise cone and height restrictions, the
comprehensive Park and Greenspace Plan, as well as the
• tree ordinance. See attached letter.
• Chris White, 1216 Whispering Lane, Southlake, opposed.
• "No "blanket" zoning without specific purchase or user,
entrance on Carroll /Highland." no
• Christopher McGuire, 2089 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
opposed. Resident states concerns with the "timing" of
meetings and notification of impending meetings. See
attached letter.
• Letter received from North Carroll Avenue Homeoirners.
Letter states concerns with safety, diminished quality of life,
loss of property values,negative environmental impact, waste
water disposal, groundwater runoff, and flash floods. See
attached letter.
• Michael Howe, 2612 Parker Court, Southlake, opposed.
Resident states concerns with safety and traffic. See attached
letter.
Two(2) identical responses were received. Letter states concerns
with quality of life, location, image, flood control, drainage,
police and fire protection. See attached letter.
• Gary S. Krall, 204 Sheffield Court, Southlake, Texas.
• Paul Hendricks, 200 Sheffield Court, Southlake, Texas.
• P & Z ACTION: October 17, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table
until the November 7,1996 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting and to continue the public hearing.
November 7, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table
until the January 9, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting and to continue the public hearing.
January 9, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to continue public hearing
until the January 16, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting.
January 16, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to table until the January 23,
1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue
public hearing.
January 23, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to continue public hearing
until the January 30, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting.
January 30, 1997; Approved (5-0) to table until the February 6.
• 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue
public hearing.
i� -5
February 6, 1997; Approved (6-0-1) to continue public hearing
S
until the February 13, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting.
February 13, 1997; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan
Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996, with the
following amendments:
• no impervious coverage in the flood plain with the exception
of trails;
• 50' bufferyard on the north property line of Tract IIID:
• 4:1 slope from Timarron's property line versus the residential
property line;
• any "HC" Hotel District uses in Tract IIIC will be located at
least 400' from the north property line;
• Applicant will comply with the Landscape Ordinance,and for
every story from two (2)to four(4), they will add 1% of the
lot area to the required landscaped area, and for every story
from five(5)to six(6), they will add 2%of the lot area to the
required landscaped area;
• "CS" Community Service uses will be added to "B-1"
Business Service Park and "O-1" Office uses in the additional
notes for "crash-gate" access to Tract IIIA;
III • the following "C-2" Local Retail Commercial uses would be
permitted by Specific Use Permit only: duplicating service,
printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and
offset printing;
• "C-3" General Commercial uses would be limited to 20% of
the gross acreage in Tract IIIB;
• "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial and "C-2" Local Retail
Commercial uses would be limited to 50% of the gross
acreage in Tract IIIB and in Tract IIIC
COUNCIL ACTION: June 3, 1997; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review
Summary No. 2 dated May 30, 1997 and subject to the submittal
dated June 3, 1997, with the following amendments:
1) create a 300' setback along the north boundary of Tract IIIA
(along E. Highland)and the northern portion of Tract IIID for
any use other than residential;
2) extend the 300' cross-hatched area to the northwest for the
balance of Tract IIIC to exclude any "0-2" or "HC" use
unless approved by City Council at the Site Plan stage.
STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review
III Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996 and oncept Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated May 30, 1997, with exception
v
of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review
1111 Summary No. 3 dated June 13, 1997.
Please find the attached submittal dated June 9, 1997. The pages
numbered "DR" will be incorporated into the final ordinance.
L:\W P-FI LES\MEMO\96CASES\96-132ZC.W PD
S
S
r c -1
•
October 11, 1996 , •
Mr. Greg Last
Community Development Director
City of Southlake
667 N. Carroll Avenue
Southlake, TX 76092
RE: Zoning Applications
Timarron Commercial Tracts 1, 2, & 3
Dear Mr. Last
Timarron Land Corporation respectfully requests amendments to the above-referenced
zoning applications as follows:
"Tract No. I (Proposed zoning-SP-2 Generalized Site Plan Development)
• Remove C-4 - Arterial Mall Commercial District (Sec. 23) from the
list of proposed zoning categories
• Tract Nos. 2 & 3 (Proposed zoning-Non-Residential P.U.D.)
• Remove the following from the proposed zoning categories.
• C-4 - Arterial Mall Commercial District(Sec. 23)
• I-I - Light Industrial District(Sec. 26)
• 1-2 -Heavy Industrial District (Sec. 27)
• Amend the residential zoning category to exclude MF-2 and, if possible,
add zoning classification SF-20
Additionally, we have enclosed a letter from Carter & Burgess, Inc. regarding the Traffic
Impact Analysis requirements. If there is any additional information required, please call.
Since yours,
ORA
S v Yetts, .E.
Development Director
Enclosure
SEY/kd
• Lastltr
REC'D O C T 11 1996
The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,
.67 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092.
REFERENCE NO:
• �1 -
I am (in favor o (Vpd to) undecided about) the request for the following g reasons:
REC'DOCT 081996
SIGNATURE:„AT)- �7iz
COOK, STEVEN E ETUX KATHERINE
(Please Print Name),527-1' + C"�C�L� C� � 1981 EAST HIGHLAND
4.-7")e%- •`) e --J . / v SOUTHLAKE TX ?60920
ADDRESS: 73 f/. o00
f- � � e�17 /Cti n
/1 I
- C-422- i Cry C�c-� Z -C• `,�
The Lawrence Family
• 1901 E. Highland
Southlake, TX 76092
10 Oct 1996 481-6101
Joe Wright
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Southlake
Dear Mr. Wright,
We are writing this in regards to the upcoming re-zoning request for Timarron
Commercial Tract 3. We understand the developer has requested to make this 200 acre
tract a Planned Unit Development tract (PUD). Among the uses permitted under this
PUD zoning are many commercial and industrial activities including auto and truck sales,
bus stations, commercial warehouses, road machinery sales, clothing manufacturing,
machine shops, public utility franchise, welding equipment and supplies, printing plant,
steel fabrication plants, and tank manufacturing to name just a few. It is also our
understanding that this type of zoning will also allow sports stadiums and hotels up to 6
stories.
Now, we realize that this land, being adjacent to Highway 114 and under the runway
13R flight path at DFW requires, and should be used for, "high quality" commercial
development. However, we don't believe in giving any developer a "blank check" in
• determing the commercial uses. It is obvious that if granted this PUD as outlined in the
package dated September 23, 1996, about the only thing they can't build is a toxic waste
dump.
Specifically we request the following modifications:
1. Heavy industrial and commercial means large truck deliveries, noise, water and air
pollution and unsightly premises. Southlake has never allowed this and we don't believe
the intent is to let this occur. We recommend carefully screening their laundry list of uses
and to further limit them to light, high quality commercial, retail and very limited industrial
uses. Specifically, prohibit 12 (heavy industrial) zoning, and put tighter restrictions on any
B2 (Commercail Manufacturing district) and I1 (light industrial) zoning.
2. Any hotels or structures over the 45' limit should be limited to locations adjacent to
highway 114 and not be near Highland street (the northern half of tract le) which is a
residential street and a primary school bus thoroughfare. We also propose eliminating the
planned roadway through Tract 3 that connects with Highland. This could significantly
increase traffic congestion especially during school start/stop times at the Carroll/Highland
intersection which would occur during business rush hours. We strongly support the
Planning and Zoning Commission's current position of permanently downgrading the
status of Highland to a two lane road, maintaining its status as a low volume residential
and school road.
410
RECD (Ju1111996
f '1C_1D
3. We know a Sports stadium is not specifically in this zoning request, however PUD
• zoning would not preclude this from occurring. This type of structure would lead to the
influx of thousands of vehicles and people on a regular basis (large numbers would be
required just to make it profitable) and further strain our traffic congestion on and off
highway 114. It would also bring with it all the asscociated problems inherent in large
numbers of people congregating at sports events (parties,alcohol abuse, noise,
unsupervised groups of kids). We recommend specific language prohibiting any kind of
stadium or arena. Half a dozen local high school football games (24 total hours of usage)
a year do not justify this type of development. Other school sports such as track, baseball
and soccer don't generate the crowds that would require a new stadium.
In conclusion, We would recommend that any resident or member of this commission
who sees no problems associated with this proposed PUD, take a drive down highway 183
through Bedford towards Fort Worth and view the concrete jungle of high density
commercial development and ask yourselves if this is your vision for Southlake.
Sincerely,
Jerry, Jacky, Meagan, Katy and
/ Robby Lawrence
•
•
1 E-11
• 1776 East Highland Street
Southlake, TX 76092
October 11, 1996
Planning and Zoning Commision
Community Development Department
Southlake City Hall
667 N Carroll Avenue
Southlake, TX 76092
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in response to the proposed land use changes under Timarron Commercial -
Tract III. The proposal is largely acceptable; I have only a few difficulties with it as
currently written.
First is the suggested 70 foot right of way on Highland Street. This seems inappropriate
for the street adjoining two Carroll ISD buildings and very near a third building. In fact,
to widen Highland to more than two lanes would compromise both the saftey and quiet of
the Intermediate School. When Southlake taxpayers and the Carroll ISD are already
challenged to accomodate our rapid growth, it seems foolish to render a functional
• building unusable.
This brings me to my second objection. I would like to see the proposed occupancies
modified to be more sensitive to the nearby schools. I would hate to see a hotel and the
accompanying drugs and prostitution introduced into the neighborhood; I'd rather have
apartments. I am also concerned about those uses that might present an environmental
contamination risk, such as plastics manufacturing or pest control services. These might
be better located near the airport in the industrial area.
I appreciate the commissions desire to retain the essentially rural character of our
communmity while providing services and diversifying our tax base. But, the main reason
people to move to Southlake is our schools. Please continue to give our childeren and
schools the highest priority in your decision making.
Sincerely,
Maria P. Cameron
•
REC'D O C T 11 1996
. ..
•
\ \i .•
' 1111 -c‘_.\ \ .:•! ..
::...
.., 1100,-%-\,,••••-M.i''t,, •
°CY? ,i1Y?k::•;.':''''' .. . \\,
,6042.,...-.z..;, :::-. .•,- .
,,,,,,,- ,..,....:,...k.f.„:-,,..-,...:;.--.- -.....lis...,..„:.,:i::::.:•:::::.:.;:,.:.,..,..:,..,,,,. ..:•.•..
o ,..e,- ....,..•-•.•.:_-.... ,-,..•
-c?.v, ..,..4.6...:!...:,
4- ..04,::, -...- . :- -?-fe- ' • - /6 -3'6•-?.(.,
2P q 6..._ - I L
/
II/4 fee 1-)
-,.
:i.,i,-.e• .,.::::,,,,,..;:,.. , -
•,,-: ,.
• , 6 / is /yly
.. .
\.,. .4-f''.,. e,/P co 7'/ c'"
0 ri)
1,--
f/a G / -
- •--r -
Cit14 1061 f;'r / j (1 ; 1
0/1"
IA .//1. 7? •4o3' 7-,
dook404040110114#10.00***Ilik ,
c . .
/4 f
HAROLD I. I?Kr
1749 E. HIS:—:.__:..-•:-; c.
. . SOLIT'r!—f]..1:2,
.:. ,::' .:,i;i.'' ''::: zi:i:::..,i.; : .,:-:•.:,:,::::i::::;:•:.:..:
RECD OCT 2 ,...
0
96-1 b 1
Summary
Zoning District Symbols and Permitted Uses
• Commun i Service District: public and private kindergartens, elementary,secondary
schools, universities and colleges; museums; libraries; golf courses; parks;
playgrounds; community centers; country clubs; public safety facilities; utility
buildings; churches; city halls.
AG Agricultural District: farms; ranches; orchards; truck gardens; plant nurseries; single-
family detached dwellings (on at least one acre) housing of the owner or operator of
agricultural use; supplemental single-family detached dwellings for full-time
employees.
RE Single Family Residential Estate District: horticultural activities; agricultural uses
for on-premises consumption; single-family detached dwellings(on at least one acre)
housing the owner or operator of the agricultural use (entire tract of land at least five
acres); parks; recreational spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game
courts; city halls; fire and police stations.
SF-lA Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single
family detached dwellings; minimum floor area of main residence 2,000 square feet;
parks; recreation spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city
halls; fire and police stations. (Lot area minimum 43,560 square feet)
0113 Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-IA; minimum floor area
of main residence 1,500 square feet.
SF-30 Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single-
family detached dwellings; parks; lot area 30,000 square feet.
SF-20A Single Family Residential District: same uses permitted in SF-30; lot area 20,000
square feet; minimum floor area of main residence 1,800 square feet.
SF-20B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-20A;minimum floor area
of main residence 1,500 square feet.
•
MF-1 Two Farnil_y_Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single
family detached two family dwellings; parks; recreational spaces; city halls; police
and fire stations.
MF-2 multiple famil re
(apartments, condominium , ational spaces; city halls;
ire stations.
40WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
ry
0-1 Office District: accounting and tax preparation; adjustment and collection services;
advertising agencies; architecture; banking; billpaying services; business corporate
headquarters; business holding and investment services; chamber of commerce;
• chiropractors; computer services; consumer and mercantile credit reporting;
contractor offices; dentists; duplication and mailing services; employment services;
engineering; finance; interior design; land surveying; law; management consultants;
optometrist; physicians; podiatrists; psychiatrists; psychologists; radio recording and
television broadcasting; real estate and insurance; savings and loans; securities and
commodity brokers; stenographic services; title companies; travel bureaus or
services; utility offices; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories.
0-2 Office District; all uses permitted in 0-1; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet.
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District: architects; bakeries; barber and beauty shops;
cleaners; laundries; gasoline filling stations; grocery stores; meat markets;
newsstands; bookstores; restaurants; tailor; city halls; fire and police stations.
C-2 Local Retail Commercial District: any use permitted in 0-1 and C-1; antique shops;
bakeries; bicycle sales and repair shops; blueprinting or photostating; book or
stationary store; vocational schools;
December 31; cigar or tobacco stores; cleaning and laundries;
confectionery stores; custom dress making; dancing schools; day nurseries;
delicatessens; ; drug stores; dry goods and notion stores;
duplicating services; filling stations; financial institutions; florist or gift shops; •
-
-€eod-lockers; grocery stores; meat markets; health service facilities;jewelry stores;
• leather shops; optical goods; photography shops; radio and television sales and
servicing; restaurants; shoe repair; sporting goods; tailors; automotive accessory
sales; variety stores; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories.
C-3 General Commercial District: any use permitted in C-2; auditoriums; theaters and •
cinemas; coin and stamp shops; commercial amusement centers; commercial art
galleries; golf courses; department stores; dry goods and notion stores; electrical and
gas appliances and supply sales; hardware stores; hat shops; health and physical
fitness centers and gymnasiums; hobby shops; furniture stores; lodges; sororities
and/or fraternities; medical care facilities; mortuaries; funeral homes; music shops;
plant nurseries; pet shops; piano stores; plumbing and heating appliances, repair and
installation servirPS; printing jobs; retail stores; skating rinks; taverns; clubs; toy
stores; upholstery shops; variety stores; maximum height of 3 stories and 35 feet.
C1• Arterial Mall Commercial District: any use permitted in C-3; indoor and outdoor
shopping malls; commercial traditional mall land; maximum height of 6 stories and
90 feet.
G:\wPF\LIsTs\zoNDIST.WPD
B-1 Business Service Park District: any use permitted in 0-1; administrative, executive,
and editorial offices; ; banks; barber and beauty
shops; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; book and
stationary shops; computer 44 p44-f-Ac-44-ir-a--and research; dry goods; electronic
• uiauuf ctur and research; funeral homes; printing and publishing;
; m.aufacturing of s; medical :I
clinics; nursery yards; g; schools;
professional and business schools; retail activity;
security guard quarters;
assembly; fine arts training studios; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum
height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more
than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet.
B-2 CommeL ial Manufact1rink District: used merchandise retail establishment;
automobile or motorcycle sales or rentals;
storage sales; builder supply; bus station; restaurant fixture supplies;
produce markets; rent feed sto'eb; matey sales and
city halls; police & fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet
of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from
residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet.
Light Industrial_District: any use permitted in 0-1; aluminum product fabrication;
armature winding; wholesale bakery; blacksmithing or horseshoeing • : oom
m facturing; cabinet or carpentry shop; candlemaking; candy • • t; carpet
cleanin•, clothing manufacturing; cold storage warehouse; c• • ercial school;
compoundin: - cosmetics and toiletries; creamery and dairy - oduct processing; egg 1
storage, candling, ing, and grading; electronic co • •onents manufacturing and
assembly; feed stores; g blowing; ice cream g; ice manufacturing and bulk
ice storage; insulation applic- '•n; irrigati•• ales and service; janitorial services;
laboratories; linen and towel sery achine shop; mattress manufacturing or
renovation; manufacturing of .: •teal • dental equipment; mini-warehouses;
monument manufacture; o.-- ental-iron wo • pest control businesses; plastic
fabrication; plumbing •-acing, refrigeration; or air c•-•itioning shop; public utility
facilities; pump •+es and service; roofing contractor; s. - - d door manufacture;
sheet met. shop; sign manufacturing; spray painting ••; store fixture
manu Luring and sales; warehouses; welding equipment and supp '- • city halls;
•• and police stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 •$ and
20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories an.
feet; minimum lot size of 5 acres.
G:\WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
•
i kHeavy Industrial District: all uses permitted in I-I; agricultural implement and tracto
4111 sales and service; automobile and motorcycle sales, rental, service; bottl'.: • ants;
bric , • ottery, or terra-cotta making; building material stora:=; . terminal and
maintenance ••.; contractors plan or stora:- • . as; corrugated metal
manufacturing; cotton s • :e. electroplatin: • . hies; feed grinding and processing;
flour mills; food products manu a•m-.•.i :; grain elevator and storage; lumber yards;
machine shops;milling, •.,.• e home sales, . •ufacturing,storage; household goods
moving; oil w- •uipment sales; service, storage; a . • aceutical manufacturing;
po .a - •uilding manufacturing and sales; printing plant or n- • •. •er; tile roofing
manufacturing; trailer or camper manufacturing; trailer or truck sa • , a ck or
railway freight terminal; truck stops; warehousing; welding shops.
HC Hotel District: hotels and motels; public parks and playgrounds; private golf course;
city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet.
I
iM ed Housing: manufactured housing; mobile horn •
prefabricated housing; ci s ions; maximum height of 2 1/2
eet.
PUD ?Ia.nned Unit Development District: residential and non-residential uses permitted;
residential PUD district must be at least 50 acres; non-residential PUD district must
be at least 10 acres.
0
1 Site Plan District Regulations (Detailed): to develop different sized and shaped land
areas; multiple land uses; to establish compatible land uses; no minimum land area.
S-P-2 Site Plan District Regulations (Generalizedl: to permit flexibility of area regulations
while restricting usages; minimum of two acres.
.'PE1LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
• JAMES AND CECILE GARDNER
1213 Ashmoore Ct.
Southlake,TEXAS 76092
• METRO(817)329-0629 REC'D O C T 311996
October 30, 1996
City of Southlake
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Commissioners,
We are writing to you to express our extreme concerns with regard to the proposed
zoning change to the Timarron Commercial - Tract III. As residents of Southlake and
specifically Highland Estates, we want to present to you, our desires for this tract to
maintain it's current zoning until, which time, Timarron is prepared to come to the city
with a legitimate and specific Development Plan.
We have heard from Timarron, that the city has "a narrow window of time" to take
advantage of potential user interests in the available land along the 114 corridor through
Southlake. They want us to believe that if we don't give them the zoning change they are
requesting now, we all stand to loose a great deal, due to future declining opportunity to
attract quality users. Timarron representatives have stated that Southlake has a perceived
• reputation with potential users of exercising difficult and lengthy zoning and
development negotiations. Timarron feels this makes it much more difficult to attract
users without the requested zoning change. We, however, feel this is a great reputation to
have and we are proud of our Planning and Zoning Commission and City Staff and
Counsel for building this reputation. This reputation has and will continue to have, a long
term, positive affect on the quality of life for all of us who live in Southlake.
If you, the Committee, make the unfortunate decision to grant Timarron's request for the
zoning changes to the three commercial tracts, we as neighbors to these tracts, must insist
that the zoning categories B2, Il, and I2 be prohibited. These categories are absolutely
unacceptable uses of these properties and will decrease our property values and
potentially impact the safety of our children. We must also insist that at no time, now or
in the future, shall any vehicle access be permitted, in any capacity, to East Highland
from Tract III or any other adjacent properties.
We place our trust in you, the Committee, to assist in the protection of the health, safety,
and welfare of all Southlake residents.
Sincerely,
,g,k,„.
0
,`' James a`nd Ceci e Gardner
9E• le _i
1203 Ashmore Ct.
Southlake, TX 76092
October 30, 1996
• City of Southlake REC'D OCT 311996
Planning and Zoning Commission
Southlake, TX 76092
Dear P&Z Members,
I would like to voice my concerns regarding Timarron Land Corporation's request
for rezoning of the Timarron Commercial property, Tract III (200.822 acres). This
request is for a Non-Resdidential Planned Unit Development (P.U.D) - "Mixed Use
Business Park" submitted September 23, 1996.
I realize that this property will be developed and am not against this. However, I
want to be able to have a voice in what the development is since I live directly across East
Highland in the Highland Estates Subdivision. I am concerned with the "Concept Plan"
that is being requested. According to Section 30 of the city of Southlake Comprehensive
Zoning Ordenance, Paragraph 30.2 states "The PUD District will allow the development
of any combination of uses which are permitted in that district." At the Timarron
meeting Tuesday night, October 29th, Steve Jett stated "what will be built is not known,
but will be in our vision". I see "Timarron's vision" is what is the most profitable for the
Timarron Corporation, not what is in the best interest of the residents.
• With the broad range of categories and the limitless number of"permitted uses"
under the categories, and with also a possibility of a land sale to a third party with no
partnering with Timarron, the residents have no protection under the PUD "Concept Plan"
that a satisfactory development will take place. We will lose any control of what
"permitted uses" can be developed once the "concept" zoning has been approved as
submitted.
If Timarron could provide us with a more detailed plan such as the alternative
process procedure by submitting a "Development Plan" as stated in Section 30.8 it would
be much easier to go along with and give my approval to the rezoning request. A
Development Plan would provide as much detail as possible including a scale drawing
showing any proposed streets and alleys; utility and garbage easements; street changes;
elevations drawings that show the relationship of the buildings to adjacent property;
preliminary drainage plans'; screening and landscaping plans in relation to adjacent
property; ie....
I strongly urge you as a member of the P&Z Commission to require more detailed
plans and limit the scope of the zoning request rather than approving the Concept Plan as
is.
Sincerely,
• David Edelen
tr7U - 191
•
S
1002 Quail Rain Road
Southlake, TX 76092
November 7 , 1996
City of Southlake
Planning and Zoning Commission
Southlake , TX 76092
Dear P&Z Members ,
I am very much against the request for BROAD , LOOSE , rezoning
of the three tracks of land north of 114 in the vicinities of
Carroll Road , White Chapel and Dove Road , as requested by
Mobil/Timarron .
M/T should be required to present a detailed development plan
for the property and not be granted the broad loose zoning
they are requesting .
1111 The development of the 530 acres in question will have a major
impact on future development and property values in Southlake .
The city of Southlake and its residents stand to loosea great
deal by moving too quickly and giving in to M/T broad , loose
zoning demands .
I trust that you , the Committee , will not bow to the pressure of
big business and will require Mobil/Timarron to present a detailed
development plan . In so doing Southlake will continue to be the
city we are proud of.
Sincerely ,
-2-72 cL, 7 c_-.. -c- -1„, --
Margaret C . Burnette
Property owner , resident
1111 (EC'DNOV 071996
• TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission
667 N. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT III
The undersigned, residing in the vicinity of Tract III, feel that certain
modifications to the application are imperative if this development is to be at all
compatible with residential living and the health., safety and welfare of area citizens. It is
respectfully requested that in deliberating this case, you consider the following things
which will soften the impact of the development on those of us in the immediate vicinity.
General considerations
1. Require at least two rows of single family lots (R-20A) along E. Highland, which are
accessed only from Highland.
2. Allow no traffic connection between SH 114 and E. Highland, as a stipulation of zoning
approvaL
3. Allow no relaxation of height limitations.
4. Avoid "night-time" activities on the northerly-most 1/3 of the tract.
5. Allow no sports stadia or arenas and allow no elevated tennis courts etc.
6. On the northern 1/2 of the tract, on areas other than R-20A, seek corporate
• HQ's/campus structures with heavy landscaping, berming etc.
Specific considerations
In the following districts take the action indicated:
1. C-S
d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds. )
g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power
substations....water/sewer treatment plants)
2. 0-1;0-2: and C-1
Disallow any use within 400 feet of E. Highland
3. C-2
#6. Disallow (Blueprinting or photostating)
#11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry )
#17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....)
#20. Disallow (Duplicating service, printing, lithography )
#24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...)
#36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...)
Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
•
REC'D NOV 0 4 1996
7`-2) -i
•
4. C-3
#2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas)
#3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...)
#7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...)
#10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...)
#17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...)
#18. Disallow (Mortuaries...)
#21. Disallow (Pet shops)
#23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating appliances...)
#24. Disallow (Printing, lithographing...)
#27. Disallow (Taverns, clubs...)
Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
5. B-1
#3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...)
#10. Disallow (Funeral homes)
#11. Disallow (Lithograph, engraving, printing...)
#9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity
#14. Disallow (Medical clinics)
#15. Disallow (Nursery yards....)
• Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
/ 6. B-2-
Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail
uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...)
7. HC
Disa " w all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, but provide that none may be
loc to within 400 feet of E. Highland and any within 1,200 feet of Highland shall
o uz aced tc; -. s` :- ar e--+
/). ,31
1/
Tho9
11-- iz - ,4. iti-
• TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission
667 N. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT III
Residents from the area around Tract III met on December 7, 1996, to explore
formulating a consensus of opinion with regard to allowable development on this tract.
Approximately two dozen were in attendance with another dozen represented by proxy.
We understand that the applicant in this case is in the process of modifying the application
to exclude certain uses and to provide limitations on height ana to r ^vide for buffering,
landscaping etc. Nonetheless, the application as it presently stands is unacceptable to us in
many respects, and it must be modified to make it more compatible with residential living
in order to obtain our acquiescence.
Generally, our principal concerns fall into several categories:
1. Traffic on Highland;
2. Uses adjacent to Highland and adjacent to residences on the south side of
Highland;
3. Visual impact of the entire tract, but primarily the portions on Highland and
adjacent to the residences on the south side of Highland; and
• 4. Drainage.
We suggest that these issues be addressed as follows:
A. The north 1/2 of the tract should be limited to low rise, campus-style corporate
HQ's-type uses with heavy screening and landscaping, open space buffer zones and
severe limitations on nighttime activities;
B. There should be a buffer zone of 300 feet-depth along Highland within which
there can be no use at all, including no parking, no roadway or access of any kind,
and no structures. Similarly, there shall be no use, roadway, parking or otherwise
allowed on the portion of Tract III within 300 feet of the following parcels identified
on the applicant's Existing Adjacent Land Owners Map as #5, #8, #11, #13, #14,
and #16.
C. There should be no structure on any portion of Tract III which exceeds 2 1/2
stories in height.
D. No sports facilities should be allowed on the tract.
E. There shall be no traffic connection between SH 114 and Highland.
AND No f}Cc zs 7�a �,l:P�i/3,�,L efr2,3" A1/1* '
pri n ore-7 viz
1.47 Nca7. SL 3 O G j
Saco..-ram -�. •�l �o Grra/f .lr.
F
Jfl_-
n123 \
SF. The City, the applicant and the ultimate developer of the tract shall guarantee
that development of Tract III shall not result in increased drainage
run-off Ji swd—
,Specific considerations
In the following districts take the action indicated:
1. C-S
d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds. )
g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power
substations_...water/se•w.r treatment plants)
2. 0-1;0-2
✓Allow no municipal facilities
3. C-1
Allow no municipal facilities
All uses must orient to SH 114
4. C-2
S #11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry )
#17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....)
.
#24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...)
#36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...)
5. C-3
#2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas)
#3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...)
#7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...)
#10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...)
#17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...)
#21. Disallow (Pet shops)
#23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating applianc
•)
#27. Disallow (Taverns, clubs...)
5. B-1
Allow no municipal facility
#3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...)
#10. Disallow (Funeral homes)
• #9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity
#14. Disallow (Medical clinics)
#15. Disallow (Nursery yards....)
6. B-2
Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail
uses which arc reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...)
7. HC
Disallow all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, which must be limited to the
southerly 1/2 of the tract.
�b✓2
Name
JA-o p �o o`� ����
Address
TRACT3B.WPS
•
•
The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,
•
667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092.
-FERENCENO.:: ZA96-132 (renotificationl RE JAN 0 61997
I am (infraarvf) (opposed to) the request for the following reasons:
Because it includes manufacturing, repair services, taverns, clubs, and used merchandise,sales and
other uses that I do not want located next to my property; however I would be in favor of the
request if it was modified to eliminate those uses that I have marked through on the attached
Summary of Zoning District Symbols a d Permitted
Uses. _
•
SIGNATURE: ` '
(Please Print Name) fh1
//1 . t / Pd ffr ,-,
ADDRESS: - _ -
KG HT,HARO I
1749NIE HIGHLAN LDD ST
SOUTHLAKE TX 760924709
________l
O . •
• .
. .
. . .
•
, ,
• .
III
�C\ \ E9E '4)1
.
i►
Summary 'Fr Zoning District Symbols and Permitted Uses 1
Community Service District: public and private kindergartens,elementary,secodary
schools, universities and colleges; museums; libraries; golf courses; parks;
playgrounds; community centers; country clubs; public safety facilities; utility
buildings; churches; city halls.
AG Agricultural District: farms; ranches; orchards; truck gardens; plant nurseries; single-
family detached dwellings (on at least one acre) housing of the owner or operator of
agricultural use; supplemental single-family detached dwellings for full-time
employees. --
RE Single Family Residential Estate District: horticultural activities; agricultural uses
for on-premises consumption; single-family detached dwellings (on at least one-acre)
housing the owner or operator of the agricultural use(entire tract of land at least five
acres); parks; recreational spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game
courts; city halls; fire and police stations.
SF-lA Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single
family detached dwellings; minimum floor area of main residence 2,000 square feet;
parks; recreation spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city
halls; fire and police stations. (Lot area minimum 43,560 square feet)
4111B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-1A; minimum floor area
of main residence 1,500 square feet.
SF-30 Single Fam*v Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption;single-
family detached dwellings; parks; lot area 30,000 square feet.
SF-20A Single Family Residential District: same uses permitted in SF-30; lot area 20,000
square feet; minimum floor area of main residence 1,800 square feet.
SF-20B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-20A;minimum floor area
of main residence 1,500 square feet.
•
\MF:1 „ Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single
family detached two family we in ;
al s aces; city halls; police
and fire stations.
F-2 Residential ' t: multiple family res'
(apartments, condominium , eational spaces; city halls;
ire stations.
\WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
' 1
Pt-
Office District: accounting and tax preparation; adjustment and collection services;
advertising agencies; architecture; banking; bilipaying services; business corporate
headquarters; business holding and investment services; chamber of commerce;
chiropractors; computer services; consumer and mercantile credit reporting;
contractor offices; dentists; duplication and mailing services; employment services;
engineering; finance; interior design; land surveying; law; management consultants;
optometrist; physicians; podiatrists; psychiatrists; psychologists; radio recording and
television broadcasting; real estate and insurance; savings and loans; securities and
commodity brokers; stenographic services; title companies; travel bureaus or
services; utility offices; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories.
0-2 Office District; all uses permitted in 0-1; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet.
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District: architects; bakeries; barber and beauty shops;
cleaners; laundries; gasoline filling stations; grocery stores; meat markets;
newsstands; bookstores; restaurants; tailor; city halls; fire and police stations. ij
C-2 Local Retail Commercial District: any use permitted in 0-1 and C-1; antique shops;
bakeries; bicycle sales and repair shops; blueprinting or photostating; book or
stationary store; vocational schools; Christmas treeles- room on wee " e
fere
Thanksgiving through December 31; cigar or tobacco stores; cleaning and laundries;
confectionery stores; custom dress making; dancing schools; day nurseries;
delicatessens; ; drug stores; dry goods and notion stores; •
S duplicating services; filling stations; financial institutions; florist or gift shops;frozen
food lockers; grocery stores; meat markets; health service facilities;jewelry stores; •
leather shops; optical goods; photography shops; radio and television sales and
servicing; restaurants; shoe repair; sporting goods; tailors; automotive accessory
sales; variety stores; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories.
C-3 General Commercial District: any use permitted in C-2; auditoriums; theaters and
cinemas; coin and stamp shops; commercial amusement centers; commercial art
galleries; golf courses; department stores; dry goods and notion stores; electrical and
gas appliances and supply sales; hardware stores; hat shops; health and physical
fitness centers and gymnasiums; hobby shops; furniture stores; lodges; sororities
and/or fraternities; medical care facilities; mortuaries; funeral homes; music shops;
plant nurseries; pet shops; piano stores; plumbing and heating appliances, repair and
installation st rvires printing jobs; retail stores; skating rinks; taverns; olubs; toy
stores; upholstery shops; variety stores; maximum height of 3 stories and 35 feet.
C- I Commercial District: any use permitted i • •
tstrtmor
shopping malls. c d- maximum height of 6 stories and
eet.
11)F\LISTs\zoNDIST WPD
•
Y off
Heavy Industrial District: all uses permitted in I-1; agricultural implement and tracto
i sales and service; automobile and motorcycle sales, rental, service; boar.: . ants;
brie , • pottery, or terra-cotta making; building material stora:•; .us terminal and
maintenance ..; contractors plan or stora e • • us; corrugated metal
manufacturing; cotton s . i_e• electroplatin: • • sties; feed grinding and processing;
flour mills; food products manu an:--. g; grain elevator and storage; lumber yards;
machine shops;milling, is.•• e home sales, ufacturing,storage;household goods
moving; oil w- .uipment sales; service, storage; aceutical manufacturing;
porta. - .uilding manufacturing and sales; printing plant or n a er; tile roofing
manufacturing; trailer or camper manufacturing; trailer or truck sa ; ck or
railway freight terminal; truck stops; warehousing; welding shops.
HC Hotel District: hotels and motels; public parks and playgrounds;private golf course;
city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. = -.
Ivfli actured Housing: manufactured housing; mobile home •
prefabricated housing; ci s tons; maximum height of 2 1/2
D eet.
PUD Planned Unit Development District: residential and non-residential uses permitted;
residential PUD district must be at least 50 acres; non-residential PUD district must
be at least 10 acres.
01 Site Plan District Regulations (Detailed): to develop different sized and shaped land
areas; multiple land uses; to establish compatible land uses; no minimum land area.
l
S-P-2 Site Plan District Regulations (Generalizedl: to permit flexibility of area regulations j
while restricting usages; minimum of two acres. j
•
410TF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
C 7 a9 I.
Business Service Park District: any use permitted in 0-1; administrative, executive, i
and editorial offices; ; banks; barber and beauty
shops; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; book and j
rill
goods; electronic I!
stationary shops; computer �,�n,,f�rr,}ra and research; dry
�e and research; funeral homes; printing and publishing; u `e•of
t; s; medical
g; schools;
clinics; nursery yards;
professional and business schools; retail activity; '
•
etr ment manufactitr.in}g; security guard quarters; S ncr a^C�
assembly; fine arts training studios; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum
height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more
than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet.
B_2 Commercial Manufacturing District: {t
•
automobile or motorcycle sales or rentals; ,
repair; RV storage/sales; builder supply; bus station; restaurant fixture snnpj k s; J
ar
1il
. •
d 1�
produce markets; rental equipme ; . , �._.,:., rA ,,.,hnlcrary �,
P ice ctore Fivture Gales faciliti s; truck calr-< <- , �•
wholesale houses; city halls; police & fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet
of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from
residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet.
�.,ight Industrial District: any use permitted in 0-1; aluminum product fabrication; •
armature winding; wholesale bakery; blacksmithing or horseshoeing ; - oom
m•.• facturing; cabinet or carpentry shop; candlemaking; candy . • t; carpet
cleanin•. clothing manufacturing; cold storage warehouse; co•-, ercial school;
compoundin: . cosmetics and toiletries; creamery and dairy e oduct processing; egg
storage, candling, . ing, and grading; electronic co . .onents manufacturing and
assembly; feed stores; g blowing; ice cream .. g; ice manufacturing and bulk
ice storage; insulation applic. :•n; irrigati.• ales and service; janitorial services;
laboratories; linen and towel sery -• _ achine shop; mattress manufacturing or
renovation; manufacturing of •,•teal ..•s dental equipment; mini-warehouses;
monument manufacture; o••• ental-iron wo • pest control businesses; plastic
fabrication; plumbing •-ating, refrigeration; or air c.•.itioning shop; public utility
facilities; pump .•es and service; roofing contractor; s. • . d door manufacture;
sheet met. shop; sign manufacturing; spray painting •••; store fixture
\ ( manu . turing and sales; warehouses; welding equipment and supp ': - city halls;
and police stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 •! and
20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories an.
feet; minimum lot size of 5 acres.
OPRLISTS\ZONDIST.WPD
'1r - '. I
rm maybe filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning
Commission, i
e following fo R�a r oe;fii
667 Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. _ /�D !1
REFERENCE NO.: ZA 6-13
z__J
2 renotificati n / �� reasons:
f) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following
I am (in favor o pp � �o � l� �- �!�� l�� �U�
n S — No �.�/,'G sa-� bur / /I
* SIGNATURE: I
(Please Print Name) T ,o�n
c r Ms Y4 :
ADDRESS: I —�
COOK,STEVEN E ETUX KATHERINE
1981 EAST HIGHLAND 760920000
SOUTHLAKE TX
b I
TO D
O 40 (A3e-,-r--c (19 ir• 71-7"et 1'1--C/I')I--S.S if 0 ci ) ) c i e-----C
�' Se_ — 0
Pa.) ; d 0 /-% 71- 0 A it a A__,-.1c_a,_.0- --)--6 ,) e_r-
1\ D b D-- . ,._f a_1/ j r) ,Se.r--.71-; 0 r-) Z---) 6—
b r >1- A e__r r. Se_c--+it o f- Op -S-f-or ; e_s)
/' c 0c�c �r ak. ) h 0 i�
C.
�� ^ D r off. -/-`i er, n Scc�
*-- ,_)‘
00 � So �-`�1. ,._ . ck-e2 0-\---- uk . s . Lo 6.,i-er Ok,t3)
REC'D J A N 0 n 1997
C 7 LE`3/ .
(.
• B. Dennis King
205 Manor Place
Southlake,Texas 76092
Home-817/424-3094
Work-817/871-8605
TO: Members of The Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Southlake(Fax 817/488-9370)
FROM: I Dennis King
DATE: i January 23, 1997
RE: Timarron Rezoning
AZ96 130. 131. 132
Please be advised that I am opposed to the rezoning Timarron is requesting for the referenced
tracts. I attended the first meeting the Timarron representatives held with various SPIN groups and was
unimpressed with the presentation. It became obvious very early in the meeting that Timarron had not
performed any land planning but simply wanted a zoning designation which would permit the greatest
flexibility for them. I believe it would be grievously unfair for the City of Southlake and its residents to
approve the zoning requests in their present condition. Please remember, PUD's were never intended to
be a substitute for good land use planning.
0 It should also be pointed out that Mobil Oil is no longer the owner of Timarron. The new owner
is Westwood, which is a real estate company comprised mainly of executives formerly with Morgan
Stanley, a Wall Street investment banker. The new owner, Westwood, should speak specifically to its
plans for the property-not what it thinks or hopes will happen in the future. It is my understanding that
Westwood is a "horizontal" developer and not a "vertical" developer. Accordingly, in all likelihood,
Westwood will develop the infrastructure (streets and utilities) and then sell off the tracts as users come
along. Each sale, if good planning does not happen now,could be a setback for Southlake's commitment
to quality development and good commercial neighbors. With each sale by Westwood the residents of
Southlake could very easily find their quality of life moving further along a downward spiral until that
quality of life is only a distant memory.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
G:UtPC1l,EGAU WORD\H01:195Q0%BDK9597DOC � _,O� 3
(` 2
N 3 \gg7
•
TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission
667 N. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT HI
The undersigned, residing in the vicinity of Tract III, feel that certain
modifications to the application are imperative if this development is to be at all
compatible with residential living and the health, safety and welfare of area citizens. It is
respectfully requested that in deliberating this case, you consider the following things
which will soften the impact of the development on those of us in the immediate vicinity.
General considerations
1. Require at least two rows of single family lots (R-20A) along E. Highland, which are
accessed only from Highland.
2. Allow no traffic connection between SH 114 and E. Highland, as a stipulation of zoning
approvaL
3. Allow no relaxation of height limitations.
4. Avoid "night-time" activities on the northerly-most 1/3 of the tract.
5. Allow no sports stadia or arenas and allow no elevated tennis courts etc.
6. On the northern 1/2 of the tract, on areas other than R-20A, seek corporate
• HQ's/campus structures with heavy landscaping, berming etc.
Specific considerations
In the following districts take the action indicated:
1. C-S
d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds )
g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power
substations....water/sewer treatment plants)
2. 0-1;0-2: and C-1
Disallow any use within 400 feet of E. Highland
3. C-2
#6. Disallow (Blueprinting or photostating)
#11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry )
#17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....)
#20. Disallow (Duplicating service, printing, lithography )
#24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...)
#36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...)
• Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
rie-33 �,
•
4. C-3
#2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas)
#3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...)
#7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...)
#10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...)
#17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...)
#18. Disallow (Mortuaries...)
#21. Disallow (Pet shops)
#23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating appliances...)
#24. Disallow (Printing, lithographing...)
#27. Disallow (Taverns,
Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
5. B-1
#3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...)
#10. Disallow (Funeral homes)
#11. Disallow (Lithograph, engraving, printing...)
#9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity
#14. Disallow (Medical clinics)
S #15. Disallow (Nursery yards....)
Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland
6. B-2
Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail
uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...)
7. HC
Disallow all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, but provide that none may be
located within 400 feet of E. Highland and any within 1,200 feet of Highland shall
be limited to 4 stories or 60 feet in height.
/17711-1--eze
:1 1 1Wxe C --
./71?--/f.
111 / ,
x,7 2_
v1E-3(1c.
Ashmore Court
r ,
•1210
Southlake, Tx 76092
19 January, 1997
City of Southlake
667 North Carroll Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092
Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners:
This letter will present recommendations for the REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN
FOR TIMARRON COMMERCIAL. As
about Tract III,ZA 96-p32me of the concepts aply to all three tracts, I
which is nearest to
speak in general terms then in part
our home in Highland Estates.
Our understanding is that if you grant rezoning on a tract, the city has no more control
of street access and egress. Please advise us on this matter.
First, Southlake should prohibit vehicle access from Timarron Commercial
Tracts I, II, and III on Whites Chapel, Carroll, and Highland. These are
neighborhood arteries fronted by residences, churches, and schools. The
additional traffic from construction restaurants or offices should be restricted todelivery trucks, from vehicles rning Staten
and out from commercial,
Highway No. 114. Some limited traffic flow may be allowed on Dove and
•
Kimball.
Our understanding is that the Noise Cone for air traffic landing or taking off from
Runway 13R / 31L extends directly over Tract II and Tract III. Clarify the restrictions
agreed upon between the City of Southlake and DFW Airport in regards to the Noise
Cone and building heights. Please advise us on this matter.
Second, Southlake should allow residential development in all three tracts where
consistent with the agreement between Southlake and DFW. Thus, if the
Timarron Commercial Tracts front on residential areas or existing homes, each
tract should develop the perimeter areas with comparable housing: 1 acre lots or
estates contiguous with one acre lots or estates, 1/2 acre lots across from
existing 1/2 acre lots.
Our understanding is that Southlake is developing a comprehensive Park and
Greenspace Plan as well as a tree ordinance to preserve established timber. Please
clarify these plans as relevant to Tracts I, II, and III. Since each tract includes flood
plain, these plans for park, recreation, and trails should mold our decisions on the
Timarron tracts. Please advise us on these matters.
Third, Timarron has proposed a 300' setback on certain roads. This setback
should be restricted to greenspace--no pavement for parking, no pole mounted
•
RECD JAN 2 21997
1E-35
parking area lighting, no structures permitted in the setback. Walking, jogging, or
• equestrian paths may be included. Beyond the 300' setback, the berms and wall
structures begin.
Since the rezoning process is in full swing, I encourage the commissioners to protect
the rural, educational, and residential environment which have structured the distinctive
nature of Southlake. You, our Commissioners and later our City Council must squelch
the speculative desires of Timarron Commercial when they negatively impact the
quality of life we presently experience.
Since ly yours,
z
f-Y A4c,_________
Gerald W. Hodges
Karen A. Hodges
817-481-5932
khodges@flash.net
S
•
r3&
Christopher McGuire
• (81 7) 329-4430, (214) 258-6999
2089 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
January 16, 1997
Mr. Curtis Hawk
City Manager
City of Southlake
1725 E. Southlake Boulevard
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Curtis,
I am very concerned about the way our Planning and Zoning
Commission (P&Z) is handling the proposed Timarron Land
Corporation requests for Zoning Changes. As you know, many of us
are opposed to the request. I will detail my specific reasons for
opposition in a forthcoming letter to you and the other principles
• involved.
My concern today is that the P&Z has scheduled what may be their
final meeting on the matter for a date that is not on the usual first or
third Thursday of the month. Also, coincidentally there is an
important meeting at Solana tonight which will undoubtedly capture
the attention most of us who follow city policies. I have spoken with
a few of my neighbors and members of the press who were not
aware of tonight's P&Z meeting. The P&Z meeting scheduled for
tonight is not listed on the scroll of announcements displayed on
Channel 25.
Curtis, I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Surely, every legal step
has been taken to notify interested citizens. However, the timing of
the P&Z meeting tonight suggests an attempt to diminish the size of
the crowd at the time of voting on Timerron's request. Before taking
this critical step in the process, which I believe will have an
enormous impact on our entire community, I request that the
final vote be set at a later date and time.
•
REC'D J A N 16 1997
i
Page 2
41) Individual citizens and loosely organized neighborhood groups
cannot keep pace with a highly trained, full time staff of professional •
developers and real-estate speculators. More of us, not fewer, need •x
to attend the meetings that affect our neighborhoods and our
property.
What Timerron proposes will create the opportunity for a mish-mash
of building and development. There is nothing in their proposal that is
a plan. If granted, the zoning requests Timerron seeks will greatly
increase the resale value of the land they purchased on speculation.
To my knowledge Timerron has no specific intention to build anything.
Even if they do, we are not sure what kind of company Timerron is
now that it has changed ownership. Of course, they will assure
everyone of their good intentions. But, their primary purpose is to do
what is best for their owners and stockholders.
I am not opposed to new development, nor am I opposed to
legitimate businesses trying to make a profit in any legal enterprise.
However, I want our city planning to be closely overseen by public
officials who can be held accountable rather than trusting the
• character of our city to random market forces as is possible with the
proposed zoning.
We have an opportunity to preserve much of what brought many of
us to Southlake while remaining in control of well planned and
needed development. Or, we can become another city like any you
see along the local major thoroughfares.
I will appreciate your thoughtful consideration of my request.
Sincerely,
(\A
Christopher McGuire
(cc: Planning & Zoning Commission members, City Council and Mayor,
neighbors, others)
-561
r .
Michael Howe
• 2612 Parker Court
Southlake, Tx. 76092
817-329-4207
Mr. Joe Wright
Planning & Zoning
City of Southlake
December 10th, 1996
Dear Mr. Wright:
I am a pilot for American Airlines and I have to work this Thursday when you are
scheduled to discuss the proposed zoning change on Carroll Road at the intersection of
Primrose. I wish I could attend to personally let you know my strong feelings that the use
of that land for anything other than residential development is a grave mistake.
First of all, Carroll road is surrounded by many of our schools. To subject our
children to the possible dangers of commercial traffic, and the mix of non-residents and
young school children, is an unnecessary risk that would be an invitation for disaster in
• todays world.
Secondly, for those of us that live off of Carroll Road, it was obvious that the
whole feeling of the road, is to get off of the businesses of Rt. 114, and onto the obvious
residential planning of Carroll Road. Any commercial use, would definitely be out of
place and a violation of the trust that we have put in the City of Southlake to first, serve it's
community. I am sure you would agree, but another letter in hand can not hurt.
Lastly, I want to thank you for your time and consideration, in reading this letter.
Feel free to respond, if you desire, to the address above. Once again, thank you.
Sincerely,
Michael Howe
• REC'D DEC 161996
11C-L-F\ I
1
1
1
S
January 29, 1997
TO: City of Southlake
Planning & Zoning
RE: Cases #ZA 96-130
#ZA 96-131
#ZA96-132
Greetings:
My name is Gary S. KraII and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 204
Sheffield Ct. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land
Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that
need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed
along Highway 114.
The first concern is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it
offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than
likormally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the
ongested big cities nearby.
Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked
at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life.
The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from
everything Southlake has to offer.
A concentrated commercial/industrial park with everything from:
1. retail to manufacturing,
2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and
3. no definite buffers between commercial uses and homes or schools.
All these things strike me as making all the same mistakes towns like Irving, Arlington,
Grand Prairie and Garland, etc. have made in the past. This can only work to lower the
property values of our homes, add to the crime rate, create environmental problems and
increase traffic problems to an unbearable level. Much of the proposed development will put
commercial/industrial businesses right next to schools and increase the traffic on Carroll
Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue.
Although I live South of 114, I see 114 as the "Gateway" to Southlake. Any
undesirable development will bring down everyone, not just those North of 114 or nearest to
•
REC'D JAN 3 0 1997
•
the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114.
Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer.
Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and fire protection, etc. must be
addressed before the City of Southlake can give approval in any way to the Timarron
proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract;
otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish.
Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower
homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay
my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of
development just to supposedly lower my taxes.
I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against
low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their
golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived
development.
Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any
decisions on this rezoning issue.
S
7E-q j
r
January 29, 1997
TO: City of Southlake
Planning & Zoning
RE: Cases #ZA 96-130
#ZA 96-131
#ZA96-132
Greetings:
My name is Paul Hendrickson and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 200
Sheffield Court. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land
Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that
need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed
along Highway 114.
The first concern is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it
offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than
On
ormally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the
congested big cities nearby.
Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked
at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life.
The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from
everything Southlake has to offer.
A concentrated commercial/industrial park with everything from:
1. retail to manufacturing,
2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and
3. no definite buffers between commercial uses and homes or schools.
All these things strike me as making all the same mistakes towns like Irving, Arlington,
Grand Prairie and Garland, etc. have made in the past. This can only work to lower the
property values of our homes, add to the crime rate, create environmental problems and
increase traffic problems to an unbearable level. Much of the proposed development will put
commercial/industrial businesses right next to schools and increase the traffic on Carroll
Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue.
Although I live South of 114, I see 114 as the "Gateway" to Southlake. Any
undesirable development will bring down everyone, not just those North of 114 or nearest to
S
REC'D J AN 3 01997 _
IF-yz `�
r .
the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114.
Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer.
Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and fire protection, etc. must be
addressed before the City of Southiake can give approval in any way to the Timarron
proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract;
otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish.
Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower
homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay
my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of
development just to supposedly lower my taxes.
I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against
low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their
golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived
development.
Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any
decisions on this rezoning issue.
-(
•
OF-L136
1
e following fonn may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,
667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092.
FERENCE NO.: ZA 96-132 (renotification)
am (in favor of) opposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: &))())
O�
�-a
(SEE COMMENTS BELOW) RECD J 1997
SIGNATURE: 8 4
HERNDON,BOYD K ETUX SUSANN K
(Please Print Name) Boyd and Susan Herndon 1201 ASHMORE CT _ _
SOUTHLAKE TX �s
1201 Ashmoore Court
ADDRESS: �s24c02
Our family lives at 1201 Ashmoore Court in Highland Estates. Our home is located at the
corner of Ashmoore Court and E. Highland St. and thus our house is contiguous to the
property which is referred to as "Tract III" in Timarron Commercial 's proposal. We have
the following comments concerning the proposed zoning changes:
(1) SAFETY ON E. HIGHLAND ST. E. Highland St. is a narrow two lane street
• which serves as one of the primary routes to Johnson Elementary School and Carroll
Intermediate School. The most recent proposal from Timarron Commercial calls for
"minor access" from the commercial development to E. Highland St. Additional traffic on
E. Highland St. would pose a very significant safety threat to students in the Carroll
Independent School District. Our family requests that, as a condition to approval of any
zoning changes to Tract III, the Planning and Zoning Commission require Timarron
Commercial to agree that the development plan will not include ANY access to E.
Highland St.
(2) BUILDING HEGHTS IN TRACT HI. The most recent proposal from Timarron
Commercial would allow the construction of SIX STORY buildings in Part A of Tract HI.
This portion of Tract III is directly across the street from Highland Estates, a residential
neighborhood for over 15 years. Construction of SIX STORY buildings in Part A of
Tract III would destroy the residential character of Highland Estates. Our family requests
that any buildings in Part A of Tract III be limited to two stories.
(3) BUILDING SETBACKS IN TRACT HI. In addition to the building heights, our
family is very concerned with the building setbacks proposed for Part A of Tract III. In
order to preserve the residential character of Highland Estates, our family requests that the
building setbacks for that portion of Part A of Tract III which is directly south of Highland
Estates (Ashmoore and Blythe) be set at a minimum of 300 feet.
Thank you for this opportunity to give input on these critical issues.
S
Boyd, Susan, Sarah and Laura Herndon
Dan and Carla Hemyari
550 Cherry Lane
• PO Box 92605
Southlake, Texas 76092-2605
March 13, 1997
W. Ralph Evans
City Council Member - Place 1
do City of Southlake
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: ZA 96-132, Timarron Commercial, Tract III- with special
emphasis/attention to area labeled as Bubble "C"
Dear Councilman Evans;
We are homeowners at the above address, which is located in Briarwood Estates. Our
subdivision is a small neighborhood that is located north of Highway 114, and to the west
of Kimball Avenue. It is comprised of ten (10) single family residences, and five (5)
• duplexes. We have lived here twelve years, and are very concerned about the zoning
request made by Timarron Land Corporation in the above referenced zoning application,
as recently approved by Planning and Zoning. We wish to make known to you, who have
the authority and power to recommend that the rezoning application be accepted, rejected,
or changed to meet the quality standards the City of Southlake imposes on new
development (which gives our city the fine reputation it deserves) the following issues
and/or concerns:
1. Property values. If zoning is passed as reflected in the Planning and Zoning
Commission approval, the result will be devastating to our property value. Although
the tract known as Timarron Commercial - Tract III is currently zoned as "AG", when
selling property in this subdivision market time has proven to be around eighteen (18)
months. This is due to a number of current adverse market conditions, which include
but are not limited to: air traffic noise from DFW Airport; commercial influence that
borders the east, south, and west of the subdivision; and an ever-increasing traffic flow
on Highway 114 (which is the only access into the subdivision, as well as the only exit
from the subdivision). The best marketing feature of properties located in this
subdivision is the little remaining rural appeal, which is currently limited to the
property that borders our neighborhood to the north and can be identified as Timarron
Commercial - Tract Ill - Bubble C.
RE CD 2 1397
a
2. Traffic concerns. As mentioned above, the only access to and from our
neighborhood is from Highway 114. Access is limited to traffic traveling westbound
• on Highway 114 and turning right (north) onto either Cherry Lane or Briarwood
Drive; or traveling eastbound on Highway 114 and utilizing the crossover to turn left
onto Briarwood Drive. This crossover now also services traffic coming into and out
of the new Kroger store, and soon, the new Home Depot store. Although this
crossover serves as our only link to Highway 114 eastbound, and is now in greater use
than ever, no accommodations have been made to aid residents of our neighborhood in
accessing the highway. Time required to cross over Highway 114 westbound and
access the eastbound highway ranges from one (1) minute to ten (10) minutes. Ten
minutes may seem like a short period of time, but try sitting in your car, unable to exit
from your own neighborhood unless willing to take a great risk (and sometimes not
even then). Of course, traffic is not always like that, but then not all our activities can
be after midnight! To compound the problem even further, traffic exiting from Kroger
should only be making a right onto eastbound Highway 114. Fifty-percent (50%) and
upwards make an illegal left onto the highway, making the crossover and highway
even more difficult to access. An additional concern is the traffic increase that will
result from the opening of the racetrack, as well as further development westward on
114.
3. Concerns about zoning changes requested. There are several items of concern
regarding the zoning requested by Timarron Commercial - Tract III (as a whole, and
concerning Bubble C in particular). Even with deletions and SUP's we find the
• following zoning categories undesirable and unacceptable for the entirety of Tract III:
B2 and 02. Therefore, acceptable Bubble A zoning would be limited to Cl, C2, C3,
HC, B 1, 01, and/or CS. Furthermore, as our neighborhood will be as greatly
impacted by any zoning changes, if not more so, than other neighborhoods adjacent to
Timarron Commercial - Tract III, we find the only acceptable zoning categories for
Bubble C to be 01, CS, and/or Residential - and would strongly urge the commission
to find these three zoning categories to be the only zoning allowed in Bubbles A, C,
and D.
4. Water/Drainage concerns. As portions of our neighborhood sits at a lower elevation
than the majority of Tract III, especially Bubble C, we are concerned that current
drainage problems that we experience will be greatly increased. Homes in our
neighborhood are not part of any city or development sewage system, rather we are
currently using septic systems to handle our waste water. During times of heavy
rainfall we already have severe problems with drainage, and fear that any increase in
water runoff caused by development could cause significant health and safety issues.
5. Increase in crime. As we have already witnessed a growth in crime along with the
growth in population, we are especially concerned with having businesses spring up all
around us - and in our back yards. As mentioned earlier, the property to our north
(Tract III - C) is the only undeveloped space neighboring us, and the developed
properties already around us is all non-residential.
•
We were both discouraged and disappointed that Timarron Commercial - Tract III -Bubble C was the only section of the four sections comprising the entire tract that did not
limit zoning categories being requested in consideration of adjacent residential
neighborhoods. Bubble C is not only a piece of land to be developed —its tenants will be
our neighbors. If Timarron Land Corporation continues to act without consideration to
the fact that this tract is the only remaining non-commercial land bordering our
neighborhood, and its development will have a significantly negative impact on us, we can
only imagine how difficult any future relationship with them will be.
We were further disheartened when reading a recent newspaper article about the
approval of the zoning request by Planning and Zoning in which a P&Z
commissioner was quoted touting her own horn for protecting the Highland Avenue
residents. If you are unfamiliar with the neighborhoods in question, please drive by.
A cursory glance will prove to you that Briarwood Estates will be much greatly
impacted by the Timarron development than the "protected" Highland
neighborhoods located on Ashmore Court and Stanhope Court (the impact on these
subdivisions compared to ours seems minimal). With the exception of the December
work session (I attended a college graduation) and the meeting when the commission
voted to approve the request (I was involved in an auto accident) I have attended every
meeting during which this request was on the agenda. I voiced my concerns — and feel as
if they went unheard. As residents of this neighborhood and of the City of Southlake we
do not want to be ignored — not be Timarron Land Corporation or the city. We do not
• want to be totally swallowed by commercial properties.
We will be out of town and unable to attend tonight's meeting. Please take our concerns
seriously when deciding the fate of our neighborhood. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Oft}
Dan Hemyari Carla Hemyari
•
IIII December 12 , 1996
To: The City of Southlake, Texas
Mayor Rick Stacy
City Council Members
Planning and Zoning Commission Members
Timarron Land
From: North Carroll Avenue Homeowners
Re : Proposed Commercial Development, "Tract 2" , bounded by Hwy.
114 , Whites Chapel, Primrose Lane and Carroll Avenue
*******************************
The mixed-use, commercial PUD Zoning requested by Timarron Land is
vehemently opposed by the adjacent property owners . Our objections
have been expressed in writing and verbally at SPIN meetings and at
a P&Z meeting. They include, but are not limited to, the safety and
security of our children at the three schools on Carroll Avenue,
the diminished quality of life in our residential neighborhood, the
certain reduction of our property values, negative impact on the
environment, wastewater disposal, groundwater runoff and flash
flood issues and increased traffic among many others .
S
We have been told that several of our concerns are not properly
addressed at this juncture and will be addressed at a later date
when site plans are developed. If this is the process it is
illogical and should be changed for the benefit of the City as a
whole . We have no confidence that any owner will protect our
interests at a later date .
We believe development and planning must be responsive to the needs
and wishes of the residents . We further believe the pastoral , semi-
rural environment is the single most important reason that
residents have selected Southlake for their homes . No one, either
with the City or Timarron Land, has offered a credible explanation
of how the proposed commercial development will in any realistic
way benefit the residents .
We have carefully considered all the various aspects of commercial
development on this tract . We request that the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council recognize our legitimate and
reasonable expectations that :
1 . There be no direct or indirect vehicular access from the tract
onto Carroll, Whites Chapel or Primrose .
2 . There be no buildings, paved areas, signs, lights or commercial
structures of any kind permitted within 350 feet of Carroll, Whites
Chapel or Primrose or any adjoining property owners lot line .
III
3 . There be no construction of any buildings, signs, lights or
r1E-VS
•
(2)
IIIstructures of any kind exceeding two and one-half stories in
height .
4 . A comprehensive study of wastewater disposal, groundwater runoff
and flash flood potential by competent professional engineers be
completed prior to approval of any zoning changes .
5 . That all existing natural resources including wetlands, ponds
and trees be preserved and protected from damage, drainage or
destruction.
6 . That effective and generous buffer zones be established and
described with specificity by the developer. These buffer zones are
to protect the peace, enjoyment of quality of life and property
values of the neighboring property owners .
7 . That zoning be restricted to low-impact, low-noise, no-odor
occupancies such as office and community services and exclude
occupancies such as theaters, amusements, hotels, motels,
restaurants or health club facilities which, by their nature, will
attract transients .
8 . That deed restrictions be imposed to permanently preclude any
variances .
1111 9 . That a minimum 25% of the total acreage of Tract 2 be zoned for
single family residences on one acre lots around the interior
perimeter.
Mayor, Council and Commission. . .please consider how each of you
personally would feel about commercial development literally across
the street from your homes . Please also consider the health, safety
and security of the children in the three schools on Carroll . Thank
you.
S
9E,9
...„, ., • _ ___ . .....______ ____.____ _ _.._______._'-'-.''•;\1-
.l._.
,.l
;-• -----.-,-1-
:f,:1D 7fO'V--_E:--i-•1•
.3-- '.:..1
-c"I 1mF_-g.=-•_=,/)--.'I-'L-A'7.'.,-„
---7
:"Z-•02 s1 M
.G,PI.L.1A1.114N11D/
.t—l\4ie
0q. "..".l-
...td•‘..r t,:
-iC-A41-11-711-_Pl0-„si.1-i-'"fef.1i1r-
2ki—zr.f1 24t
AW
«m
1 +I- 1_ , . , ,1i \ P. I:._
0/
100/0.•
2000V...-.-
4'/00,'.
\
6
0D 0
— e SCAL 4000
, ,.. ..
.. ,, • ra li
irirmirrriZ,"-11
kill
11V--"; ••••••
.....
....
t g '41.1i 1 F.:1"4,11"- 11' I kal-11.1"11111)
I - mpLigi
.•_ i li
ip"`""' •ROJECT ,
1 FT\
i La,___ Loct- ioN 1E f . , . 5....",,i RI • pri"-rimomm _ _
7 :11,1: 1117
'I V'Polar-AM--17-da \I
" \ .011111Ef
i i 1 i Niiiii GRA,7EviNE
';4---) , •
It' i
---
• imi 731 1 i . A1143.11Miiiimmim ,-L.... .
i ... ... NITAVIOLIII"I 11
I 1_1 1 Pk' ." 'I 1 ,.... 1 ,•>', ..... r.'',, 1 r .6,
i
, I .......... , . .
TRACT III
SEPTEMBER IVA CflYSOIfflDIJ. PROJECT LOCATION MAP
flY OE SOU'IDLAKE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS
CA101,11 & BURGESS.INC FOR 200 822 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEvELDINENT
1 710727Pl'''7.('?'/17,7NP, 70.19,4'',,).i,,', ,4 '77,,,,, ' • ''',/:',. .'':,.,.•*17,7r,if 't 044//it:4;,,';XI. '1'7144,90 IP,,-',,7-4' '.,k&Vr.,177,1,,,,,,,rive,.,,,,,,,v,,.ilp,,,,,,:.,,,,,,,ya.„.„Fp„307...,,,,,, ,, . .44,frktr:
''' "''. t ' ' I'1,,'",;'';94,i V l',''' '',4'''AN 4'4A4''t, ii) ,n,0,11 D ,;.''',tr'', ii"!‘. t, f'0;:„. '•Ii.4,m1,6',414,,.ppes.„.t„,,,,,.1,,,,,,,..,401.,; ,,,‘! 1.' ,,,Li!....;',4,,.‘ vir .,,,'T,',F,t414;kil,si ,:!,4 1),'';7';#•!", 4101,:,..10 ,;,,,V, ',At 4 4.4 q,,,,4,.
It
',. [ ''''',, ;L i ', .':V ,,, ''',',1,„:$' t4 '1%,;,,,,:','0 ,, '1,2.yt'gi ',,'..4.',,,;',4 1 4 a.,,'' Ji,),„:1104e;;',,,f,'',,,qr,z"..i.ft,,, ''.4 t,.',14"1 VIO litog ', 1 1,y),,,,,, ,4. ,.,,, v„:,...),,,,4r;,,,,",V.74Y,'0:)b :::,N,''* %."1116:41 li''4.- •;, ' li,',.3. ','.•',,„11'k
L_ , ... ,s; __'. ' ' , ",,,,p,%,';,,,I,':',A 441;1;AO I Uri,,,,,"'A 2..g,l',,"3770..4.,,,;,(074ellhi a"li*,,,d','Mr..-,. .8,,4e„'"I'.11), ;',:.7,1.!IPII,,b.r.':-',.6.4.A.'he.;4, 4.,,44,/,.-41t it,.0.;,/,.'„'i;4.t,;”,','i4',;1:'''/0.,),),,;.e,i' ,i,,',,,,•,,'''',,,'"7,,p,,,E6 Vir,,','4,t, ,,,,',,,,,.• //:, .444,'A h.i6Eer.A.,,"1.S,,,P.P.N,..,1.0.,.-44.,-:'/;:,..•:.;:,%"4 Z g 0,
------ —- •---
1.\'&
• ' ' ,.-.' -- SL.go..i....- i•• ..,,...4_,.....,^ .4. ..,..... 1,46110.611100ailiiiikaiiiii
TRACT MAP
...1,1 ,,,, , , i _.: ,,, •
. ::: ....
--- -
, -.
- . .,
, -t
"_ _.]
__ i1iL
IASI'mu.. :I0 S'IAPYP ; : ' ;
'"I 1 -- :1:W.--.1.'rl.t.l.rk-1� • \ /:
7.
_. Ind :,� ,,.0 es� 9 11 13, 1 a :� -- \
ol1:,T :t , e.a �,.. Z - ^!..
is„ ,.�( I ---a
AM
„ a:!%146 0 ,•• �- -��
• _w ... ::.Y.
•a 0. 150 300 600 900
my - q \I / SCALE I'.600'
,r -il
I o
CAlrfit-. v — --
20 w.
33 Aa�9 ,.�Aiiitei, ;I di
_.. 2I
vo Q
'':._�•��"' _ 3 '• e iP n r� „0 •... Niftyµ® .. • a 1
•_ \
:
' ' ' . f) NA!.EV 3 1 11 .7:- 8--1
,. epfWIff' 0III_ •Cs1A1--1 _ _- _ .,,LEGEND
iNI® \ - -
_` r \ - - I IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
I .,..._ I/ •- - I __ (see Fropary owner's lint)
Y / r TRACT III
(JIY'MUGR ,ft• EXISTING ADJACENT LAND OWNERS MAP
(All (k til eINIINAKIi,'I'ANHAN'f(Y IIINII','17.7CA.S
l'Ail'I1:R & Illllt(i1:tiS,IN('. 1((11t 201.k22 A(III I'It(IPI I,I!II 1'IANNIJI 11NI1 III.VI:I/ll'RII.NI
,,,f m .p ,Vc4f r"'o q. S y g 'Sdl"'!gl1l6 im,, i^:. ii")"4 s^...'.1�1u+t, 4',, ':ivn ti- ',,, Jr: U. 1 a
w; A r Y }. ip W �` is�"� ( '' x_ *4� :tire a,l' kygj
• ' ,' ii*A
,),,,„ :
,,.,.,,,,„ ` ,,,,,,,,,, ,,.,
„,„, „
SPIN 114 JANET MURPI-IY 11111111111.1.1
ADJACENT OWNERS
AND ZONING SPIN /16 1)0116 AND RANI A FIFP.CI:.
• ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING FOR ZA96-132
03-Jan-97
Owner Name Zoning
01 HEWITT, R. SF-1A
02 THOMAS, D. SF-1A
03 HERNDON, B. SF-1A
04 KREYCIK, C W AG
05 BRAUN, F. SF-1A
06 KNIGHT, H. AG
07 CARTER, L. AG
08 COOK, S.KATHERINE SF-1A
09 HARDIN, R. SF-1A
10 QUINN, M. AG
11 RODGERS, C. AG
• 12 RECORD F. AG
13 HUNING, E. AG
14 MCMANUS, S. AG
15 MILLER, H. AG
16 BERRY, C. AG
17 STEGALL, M. AG
18 TRANSPORT UNION HALL 0I
19 ESPINOSA, L. AG
20 REMMER, B. AG
21 TAYLOR, E. AG
22 RODGERS, L. AG
23 KNIGHT, J. SF-1A
24 RESTER, M. SF-1A
25 HEMYARI, D. SF-1A
26 RUIZ, C. SF-1A
•
7E 52 L-1
• # Owner Name Zoning
27 HOWELL, D. SF-1A
28 PAFEL, T. SF-1A
29 BERK, L. AG
31 PETERKA, C. C3
32 FECHTEL GROUP, THE C3
33 GREENWAY-CARROLL ROA C3
34 D/FW-CARROLL ROAD LTD AG
35 STEELE, R. AG
36 PERIMAN, L. AG
37 SCHENK, J. SF-1A
38 COLLINS, T. SF-1A
39 JOHNSON, D. AG
40 CARROLL ISD CS
41 EUBANKS, M. AG
• 42 PATTERSON, C. AG
• 2
t 7E 53
City of South lake, Texas
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
OCase No: ZA 96-132 Review No: Three Date of Review: 6/13/97
Project Name: Concept Plan for "NR-PUD" Zoning -Tract III Timarron Commercial, 200.822 acres
situated in the Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No.481 and in the Thomas Mahan Survey,Abstract No.
1049
APPLICANT: PLANNER/ENGINEER:
Timarron - Westerra Carter & Burgess, Inc.
7605 Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250
McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas. Texas 775247
Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145
Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/9/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787.
1. Correct the typo error on page DR-13, last paragraph, first line.
* P& Z Recommendations (2/13/97): Subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October
11, 1996, with the following amendments:
i *
no impervious coverage in the flood plain with the exception of trails; (shown on DR-18, second
bullet)
* 50' bufferyard on the north property line of Tract IIID; (shown on Bufferyard/Open Space
Exhibit, after DR-16)
* 4:1 slope from Timarron's property line versus the residential property line; (shown on DR-13)
any "HC"Hotel District uses in Tract IIIC will be located at least 400'from the north property
line; (300' shown--to be consistent with other similar setbacks throughout Tracts I and II, see note
on Concept Plan)
* Applicant will comply with the Landscape Ordinance, and for every story from two (2) to four
(4), they will add 1% of the lot area to the required landscaped area, and for every story from
five (5) to six (6), they will add 2% of the lot area to the required landscaped area; (shown on
DR-16, DR-18)
* "CS" Community Service uses will be added to "B-1"Business Service Park and "0-1"Office
uses in the additional notes for "crash-gate"access to Tract ILIA; (shown in legend on Concept
Plan)
* the following "C-2"Local Retail Commercial uses would be permitted by Specific Use Permit
only: duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset
printing; (shown as SUP only on DR-9))
* "C-3"General Commercial uses would be limited to 20%of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB and
"C-1"Neighborhood Commercial and "C-2"Local Retail Commercial uses would be limited to
• 50%of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB and in Tract IIIC (See bottom bullet on page DR-17.)
'7 E-5
• City of Southlake,Texas
* A development plan specifying the intended use and development regulations for each proposed lot
111 must be submitted prior to or concurrently with the preliminary plat for this site. Subsequent
development plans and site plans will be reviewed based on the appropriate zoning district regulations
as determined by the proposed use. A traffic impact analysis will be required with the submittal of any
development plan or site plan for this site. The TIA must encompass the entire tract and not just the
portion for which the development plan is being submitted.
* Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly
recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city
ordinances prior to submittal of a site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of the
plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements.
• Vertical and horizontal building articulation of proposed buildings per §43.9C1e, Ordinance 480,
as amended in areas subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone.
• Masonry requirements per §43.9C 1 a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No.
557.
• Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C
on Pages 43-12 and 43-13, Ordinance 480, as amended; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior
landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Bufferyards according to Ordinance 480, §42 and §43
• Screening according to Ordinance 480, §39.
• Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
• Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• • Off-street parking requirements
per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.480,
as amended.
• Driveway spacings and design criteria per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634.
• Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require
construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance
No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat must be
submitted for approval and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation
plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid.
This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee. Water&
Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* The applicant should be aware that any resubmittals required due to tabling to the next scheduled
meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that time, no review
will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6"
x 9" and an 11"x 1 7"revised reduction must be provided.
40: Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation
Carter & Burgess, Inc.
L:AMVP-FILES\REV`96 96-I32CP.3
1E-55
f TIMARRON COMMERCIAL
E
• TABLE OF
CONTENTS
TRACT III
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
• PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES
• PERMITTED USES
• DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
• LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
• CONCEPT PLAN
EXHIBITS
• 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION
• BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
• CONCEPT PLAN
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
• • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
• TRAFFIC STUDY
• RUNOFF STATEMENT
,BCDJUN 09 1 ?07
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03
/C -569
` PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES
• Timarron Land Corporation is requesting rP q g a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract III
in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park" development allowing a
variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure
compatibility of land uses through creative planning.
The Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning request will divide Tract III inlo four(4) separate parcels and
will allow the following land use categories for each:
PARCEL A
• Residential*
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
PARCEL B
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• 02 - Office District (Sec. 19)
• Cl -Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20)
•
• C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21)
• C3 - General Commercial District (Sec. 22)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
• HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28)
PARCEL C
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• 02 - Office District (Sec. 19)
• Cl - Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20)
• C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
• HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28)
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-1
'7E-57
/ 1
PARCEL D
•
• Residential*
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
* The Non-Residential PUD shall allow ancillary residential uses, limited to the zoning
classifications RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 up to 10% of the land in the NRPUD (20.08 acres).
The permitted accessory uses, specific use permits, special exception uses and development
regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SF1A, SF30, and SF20 zoning districts
set forth in Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
•
•
June 9, 1997
96204401 R03 DR-2
r/E-5S
( PERMITTED USES
•
It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the zoning
categories identified in this document (as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance No. 480) and shall specifically include those uses described as:
• "Permitted Uses"
• "Accessory Uses"
• "Specific Use Permits"
• "Special Exception Uses"
• Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not
been defined by current technology shall be subject to approval criteria established in
Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 44.4, as amended.
LAND USES
There are exceptions to the permitted uses. Those uses identified with a double asterisk (**)
• shall require a Specific Use Permit (SUP).
Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract III.
RESIDENTIAL
I. Permitted Uses
I. RE - Single Family Residential Estate
2. SF1A - Single Family Residential
3. SF-20 - Single Family Residential
4. SF-30 - Single Family Residential
•
June 9. 1997
'
96204401.R03 DR-3
757-59
CS- COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT
• I. Permitted Uses - BY SUP ONLY
I. (DELETED)
** 2. Higher education institutions
** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers, and similar cultural facilities
** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs
(No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges)
5. (DELETED)
** 6. Public safety facilities
** 7. Religious institutions
** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities,
landfills, and transfer stations)
•
S .
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-4
** Use Permitted by SUP Only
7E-l00
•
0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT
. I. Permitted Uses
A. Office Uses
1. Accounting and tax preparation
2. Adjustment and collection services
3. Advertising agencies
4. Architecture
5. Banking
6. Bill paying services
7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only)
8. Business holding and investment services
9. Chamber of Commerce
10. Chiropractors
11. Computer services
12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting
13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted)
14. Dentists
15. Duplication and mailing services
16. Employment services
17. Engineering
18. Finance
• 19. Interior design
20. Land surveying
21. Law
22. Management consultants
23. Optometrists
24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature
25. Physicians
26. Podiatrists
27. Psychiatrists
28. Psychologists
29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios
30. Real estate and insurance
31. Savings and Loan
32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices
33. Stenographic services
34. Title companies
35. Travel bureaus or services
36. Utility offices
S
June 9. 1997 '
96204401.Ro 3 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
9E- t/
B. Community Facility Uses
c ** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks
** 2. Recreation and open space
** 3. Libraries
** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations)
** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character
•
•
lune 9. 1997 '
96204401.R03 DR-6 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
7E-1P2-
0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT
110 I. Permitted Uses
A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District
B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities
4111
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
7E 3
✓ C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
41)
II. Permitted Uses
A. Commercial Uses
1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature
2. Bakeries
3. Barber and beauty shops
4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats
** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores
6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets
7. Newsstands and/or bookstores
8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or"take-out" food establishments
9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops
B. Community Facility Uses
** 1. City hall, fire and police stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations).
l
. •
• .
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-8 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
l
C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
`/ • I. Permitted Uses
1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District
2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District
** 3. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias
4. Antique shops
5. Retail sail bakeries
6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops
7. Blueprinting or photostating
8. Book or stationery stores
9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers
10. Christmas tree sales
11. Cigar or tobacco stores
** 12. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats
13. Confectionery stores
14. Custom dress making or millinery shops
15. Dancing schools
16. Day nurseries
17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations
18. Dog and cat hospitals (excluding large animal clinics)
19. Drug stores
20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed
• eight thousand (8,000) square feet
** 21. Duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and
offset printing
** 22. Filling stations or service stations, operating with/without a convenience store
23. Financial institutions
24. Florist or gift shops
** 25. Frozen food lockers
26. Grocery stores and meat markets
27. Health service facilities
28. Jewelry stores
29. Leather and leather good shops
30. Optical goods
31. Photographs, portrait or camera shop and photo finishing
32. Radio and television sales and servicing
33. Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and "take-out" food restaurants
34. Shop repair services
35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair
36. Tailor
** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales
38. Variety stores
• •
June 9. 199'
96204401.R0' DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
'tE-(a5
ff C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
l
• I. Permitted Uses
1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District
** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas
3. Coin and stamp shops
** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys
5. Commercial art galleries
** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto,
but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses
7. Department stores
8. Dry goods and notion stores
9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and
installation services (excluding propane tank sales)
10. Hardware, paint, and wallpaper stores
11. Hat shops
12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums
13. Hobby shops
14. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances
15. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities
16. (DELETED)
17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers (excluding cemeteries, crematories
and mausoleums)
• 18. Music or record shops
19. Nursery buildings
20. Pet shops
21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies
22. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services (excluding
propane tank sales)
23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs
24. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work
25. Skating rinks, ice and roller
** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises
consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use
permit (excluding sexually oriented businesses)
27. Toy stores
** 28. Upholstery shops - furniture
29. Variety stores
•
June 9, 1997
'
96204401 ** Use Permitted
DR-10 by SUP Only
BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT
SB-i
I. Permitted Uses
A. Office and Commercial Uses
1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District
2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations
** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly
4. Banks
5. Barber and beauty shops
6. Book and stationery stores
** 7. Computer manufacture and research
7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit
and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated
office complex
8. (DELETED)
** 9. Electronic manufacture
10. Funeral homes (excluding cemeteries, crematories, and mausoleums)
** 11. Lithograph, engraving, printing and publishing
** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment
** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments
14. Medical clinics
• ** 15. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies
** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing
17. Private schools
18. Professional/business schools
19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the
businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex
20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure
** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing
22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters)
** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly
24. Studios for training in fine arts
B. Community Facility Uses
** 1. City Hall, policy and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations)
* Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP.
•
June 9. 1997
9620-1401.Ru3 DR-1 l ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
17E-U7
"HC" HOTEL DISTRICT
t
• I. Permitted Uses
** 1. Hotels and motels
** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned
** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned
** 4. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations)
0
S
June 9. 1997 _,
96204401.RO DR-12 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
•
It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards
currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to
all new or amended ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following
exceptions:
BUILDING SETBACKS
Setbacks for Tract III land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No.
480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across the street from
residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the
comprehensive plan, the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks
shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where
it is adjacent to residential areas.
Setback Adjacent to
Residential
RES 35'*
CS 100' Min.*
•
01 100' Min.*
02 100' Min.
Cl 100' Min.
C2 100' Min.
C3 100' Min.
B 1 100' Min.*
HC 100' Min **
* Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the
option to require a 300' building setback from the north porperty line at the site plan stage of
approval.
** Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council resreves the option to
require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and
TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school.
•
June 9. 1997 '
96204401.Ro 3 DR-13
r1E
BUILDING HEIGHTS
• Maximum building heights for Tract III land uses shall be in accordance with the following table.
Maximum Building
Height
RES 35'
2.5 Stories
CS 35'
2.5 Stories •
01 45'
2.5 Stories
02 90'*
6 Stories
Cl 45'
2.5 Stories
C2 45'
2.5 Stories
• C3 45'
3 Stories
HC 90'*
6 Stories
B 1 45'
2.5 Stories
•
* The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a
maximum of four (4) stories or sixty (60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by
S.U.P. only.
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-14
9 6'7°
•
BUFFER YARDS
• Perimeter buffer yards for Tract III shall comply with the Comprehensive
P Y p ns;<ve Zoning Ordinance No.
480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table:
Adjacent to E.
Highland, N. Kimball
and North Property Adjacent to
Line of Parcel III D Residential* Other
RES 50' 25' 25'
CS 50' 35' 25'
01 50' 35' 25'
02 N/A 35' 25'
Cl N/A 35' 25'
C2 N/A 35' 25'
C3 N/A 35' 25'
B 1 50' 35' 25'
• HC N/A 35' 25'
*Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or
medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street
from Tract III.
Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard
type.
S
June 9, 1997
96204401.R0 3 DR-15
T.-
50' BUFFER YARD SECTION
r •
ADJACENT TO N. KIMBALL AVENUE, E. HIGHLAND STREET
AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL IIID.
(IF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF PARCEL BID IS
RESIDENTIAL AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW)
e 50' BUFFER YARD L
dJl
CO
f z
A
V iii o
All a,
0
ct
,,......0 -
, •
,ro.
4r ,:L.
. ii
PARKING - N *ill ;% `„ 111111011111611)1
C�" 3'-8' HT.
ib
MEANDERING
��a--_____ � 1 +•�.,� BERM
. (AVG. 5' HT.)
3
•
JUNE 9, 1997
96204401.I I I
r/E ''
LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
•
LANDSCAPING
The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance
No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping will be provided in the
amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2) to four (4) plus 2% for every story
from five (5) to six (6).
OPEN SPACE
The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as
required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential
uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas.
A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the
location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located
according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be
performed at the development plan stage of the approval process. There will be no impervious
coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of pedestrian trails.
S
Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master
design guidelines that respond to tree preservation, at the development plan stage of the zoning
process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply
with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake, as those requirements are
developed.
The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed
buffer yards and open space for Tract III.
S .
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-16
' .
0 •
• •
.
.
,,.. .. miGuLittp...,sTREET .— •t ' - ' '-4 '. •- ' ... --"---,..,:.,.-----\y,.:7,------- -- -------' •:-..!:-.--,- --------"---',-Li—Al.(', -1 " '') ' • ' ".
• ' • '- - ,14 „,;„- :_"--i:1.1,'... ._-i---7. :.•;.....;--,....--...,--a,-, -...•,-4.. ,-_-_-_-•--_.:.._,.-.--t-......--3,-....-.,..-.-.7i7 Si?.It-71..-,...7,..-'S:2'..10.7.."?. :`..4-'37.......... ..,41......--A__ ,,....7."_,...,.... ___ _. _,,,:__4:14.,.,,,, ,,
1
r , TT ,. ;,.. ' r. .i..-.....- ,o\, ,-- . -...'', •,--' :-' ,... ',.•s.-:: ,. " •• - - - ' \\k•, '' ' i ) , ' . ,,... .,,'..,• , -... ...v-,,,,,', 7.1 . /I_ • . I,' '' Ilit''I'A.'.'^' '.• .., •I 1-'-!, I ..
1.1, ,5 .)' ,. • . ,, • . •./I '1',)).)''''). ‘j)' •. '. •'• . 11 l'' I. •^1 I . : ) "••). •\-'I' 1. .-rr'zi ,..i• . ,,- . '''f.' , - i - '-' 14ft\‘. :• '-': i'')'..:'• ...- ./.
'' ,;; ',I.! :,''"',„,....,. :,',.,'; I,j,•,^'I '. ' ' 4', , ' I \' ) ' '- . .' ', ' .- "''', I ,-.- ''--,". ''')-.. Ii.)."I '''.-^ '..). 1,-, .= .,.,.,„ ,,.!L.) •f,.- 4t"-_:-1.4.0.-.',......).1.:.:.,...2
' ..:. . " it; .,' •-.0,. ', !,' ,; .t . ; ..--.D- - , .' . Hu, : . ' '. , , ,,--::.--, -, I".)7,.5^,I',. '::'.' (, -._-:'.4-'' - ' '` r-'.' )-?).''I;'.='^i': ''";-..:1-t.'7.r."^-7..''''' -••
4•^'''''''',ill II Il'Ij pi. ,...,;.'0.'------- -, , ‘,...., , __- -.-.,........-.... 1..., ,.. .t. i. ,..,--;.: ...,., ..,r•-- , 4,.,,:- ....-- ._ I:. ..'..---A,r
•! ii!1 1 1,-'.„r, 4,•.i-/, ',.'., ,. ;:- - 1 , •-.y.,- ---- c: ..,-;\,-,-icii'..c2,,co-,4.,,_..,.._....i .ca-3-.,,,, . -..- , - .. - .,-
..c.,. - .. ,, „. ...$0'111Ufr13141,17PAP,,,, ,ftti--.S?Ac..2-R „i-F•1). : ',..:-, \,-_-_ ,
50'"iii/ 0311..-YXRD'Vfkr'Elt•SPA , Q - :---,--f.-,- ----1,- ---'.-...----
• ' ' " ' , - , \ i 1 ,'--,',-;AttcAN:.r,"","rae,H1QiiI-AtiP sTR4rr, , \)i: .,, ' ' 0, "", .___,..-..ii.An- &04.t,,,r- •.,-,-,,c, HyrvRa- .,,,FIEs' .- ._ ..:,_•172,-.;:z---.....:.- c--4,I _-_„..._,,,,_,,,11.,
l'' - " ',,,i'r,'Is''''A Ill I -'''Illtizi4',...,144%V'%'---- \)) 1 i(i) ••------. --, RE9 T°'LlE'-43f-f1,1P.'44-3 •-•------ ---- -• '..-
• ,, , • ' •,,, , , t'',.-- '',,-,41',,,:.,\i‘t 411 \ -'. / ,,,,.....,,,,,yr LAGE., V\ ).,..f. ,:.‘i'••L . i .c..•."--•:1•.:':-.,z.:f :--.77=.---.,--::-- 7-,•_:- '''' :-,••:,---.).:•.,);.i; II,i ':,j.-`, ' i 1 i • r.
k
. ' • I'f', ' '1"''-- .'",I'AIII'II!'I)111 I /.,I,'• I ;lid'ir ^) i_I)1 L)))I 'I'-.1 ;).__,;1'.=)''-''''.'"- III'.,'-•". ft''' .) ) ,,,\ I'), I 1)6,, \,,,'. ^,•;. ^'•'^ :'-'''''-' ''- , -.^',r_..- --‘':• . - :. ., '..
I; )•.!.'r ii:fI;ii 3M ,IPSPITert YAOFtiratit4 f SPACV KEOVIREO'•,..:, .,.,:•!..;1'\•.,)),?.../....,,,/,.;/7;i)ii• i(_______..-...\•If',...,:,:fl,1 i f , __.-,„,-,_- ----- . -•\kl.:......- 'i fit''...-*•:":.-2.,?._ .,...q j-t•:' , /
!WI 1 i'•dt,i. i f------:.---Ki.il 4/t,t f —-4,))^'-•1 .01A.s•EziT 16 ', , RP-StDEI‘rnAL C ',.(--..::.- ' : ,•,,).',. %,,, ,--:.• ;4)(\) )\141i f , .1 yti•;;ti•J:. '' - _,-- 5= - ". ::1-: ', ..',,,,,L__;-_-,,,,:---;-1-,
t,„P,N,,;;10 l -, .--_..-:--(--,E,...,,-,--,),---, -_ ;,,01 \ ... ,---,,.., ,-, •:-:,_....1,-,, --,,,,.,,,,'-',,.,i'„,.,//,-,,:-----.../1,..\-..,-,,,r%\le, (. i, ,.-,‘,..,i•'''.'-'.z..-.,---c=i;' - --- - .-, r, ,1 e . r' ..), L ,
,, -',-. ‘.\.'.4\'')\\I 1 ' '',V,.'''',::'', '4._----,:,'---;,,i.,,,,,.. - -*-, -,'-•,4.,,.;;.41 '1' -- ",....-".'...,=',, "•-•"-A -,-
'.''`A`..." /.f-"-7:":--,,,,_ ------_-."--_,- '.-.• k 't l'e- 1-• -.-7,,..,..., •t .. ,;:i..,_r ..r. i -
..,?.,, ,,,,, ,- !,. ._. ,t.----c: t..:•,,./..,,f,, N...„.....,‘
1•1::.7,;..' i
. It, - •., ji
, . . , , ;- - .. .._.:-,---- -•,..) .---- -,-_.-/- '•-- ;- ---ki : --,';''..-:!-Ir=:-":,, '-.----'1' .j-t•'• - ' ----.;----..1 , ...-.-I-
---‘ "' '' ' - ' '- ' ' '' '' -•iimilitrataminSt c -)
e kfir----./• 1-7-re:11,..'•-•.-=-.--7"-- ',"---",:' .."'''',.-k,„ .,....."''-----4'11`, .. ------(.- .--, ---;
, ,,,,,,,,,,,., • ...,....-,-,;1;3.40‘-„,.....)---1--- / ‘,so<....,.....„(-,--A.V ‘• ,. 'Ws"..)K---- .1,I - Q • ', }
I , -
' - , ' i.-'''''''`'''''''''''III"' -t N' ' '- - ' 'e ' I . 1/4,'1 1 r• ' '-'ti 7', <, '",,'',' r.3.i- i ' - ,',--,',..•'g 'it
,1 ''4-'1:- '''''•• ' '''1'' - " •, OPEN AOlt,/,.--!' , , -'. ••'' 'Y''' r'''e,Y',. • ' ,_ , - --2''''')$,',•ii
••••.,..1 ti,
' ' . ' `• ' ..-' , ' \. — . 41 i• • -- --.....,..:,-# .i-----1.•"`"-:', • i.z.,:t",,,-"-,... ,
-„., '• :,:' " , ,,,,,A,‘ ' .,, • ,: ,,, ' -'- ,,, - i ! • , ---- -- ',..'_,,„ \'--!_ ) -I,/,IP,''.=:''' '-"••,Ii,.; ,f5::A.1,^'''''-'-‘ II."-';',:"-ts.,..1-.^'^,^^,',"-:".I''''/ i•l•I.^ -^ - •.', .‘"
•..
• -' * ' ' : . ' _ ' - '-'"^")._ 'I'I'."-',.', • '\ 'N, ' r./ ' !:r;1! •; r!'j r ,r r'I 'C '/'j//!/i/../'. .. '. ,rtr:',..,” ..;L/2,"'•-.7 4,../.' .' - ' ////7.7 1 1/ Yr j/li//i/
• r# / _ ,, ,.J 'r ;l r / ) ,/ 1 -' / / , /. '7 Yr/r rr _';_r..rrjrrk-,,,/,.-;:.:3:•::,•' ,_,.4 ' 'I. ''''111-I/TI''''t{,-',I.i
..,.. . ,...
) ' - .' '•.. • \ ..,,r,""' 1 . ,-; \::,, - ,•, • : ,,..„ , ..,„!..-1,1i., 1,/,',,e . • ' - i ....., _,..•••...- _.... •!•I.-.'' ; t < • , --,.
. . .
..,. •-, 0, •rat,, ,., , ,.,
t• ' - \
.- : .• ,-, . , ,'•,, L,: ,Hy" 1, ' ,L,i'i;'),61,,h0 3e'‘''1•I'v,k,1%,„ '' , •'.•ii, '- -• 1 -
4 " ,\• , ' - ., ' ' ','i I 1•1“ N i - ,'••.. . ' i''''''''''''Li'' ' - .'[ '
, .s.
,,,,, , , , ,;;; 1 ...4.••<I .,;('' \;/) <'•,..).; ' V" ; ' `
,,,,,i., „. , r,--,i____ •,__ ,,,'t',.7-,..:\.1*-c ) I,i 1 1• r, i _-- - . \ --:, '.'s ''''.')'' ,".4,,, 4..j ,.4..."-.
I .:) , : . j , '' '•' '' • ', X , ,..,.':.,..' .:,4•'''' '. ,,./....6;;4 ,-',''`--^...) ''''','I1/4 F. ,.:,0-1;,.,,,.....,,,.,...,-",...,....-7-i,.4774...-:,'41:1..•-;-' )/1 4A.^' I 'I'^'S,',' ,,..../ '
iI,1 ': ' ''I ' • "I'''''.I i ,i,, ,,"'..^7. ..^^`,,,', '1,./ .I.._,);,......' .,:,''•I)1- (., r' I(II...,2II: ),, ,,,I'II ".r-_,;.4:•.-4.,..,‘-r.?'_16--:"-:::=.7.___,,,'",--,-7..,:,--,..-":1t...--:" :-;/;-"''1.I ''.,(,'. , $:.--
1 i' 4,, ,, : -:,,"i•_ \',',,, , :if _.,.-I-,-,,,_"",,..,.:,•-•--.._:-T,.-z-„,.....,,,of,--.-,, ,A • ..-* \c-..-:,....,,,,,i'a_-,,,,,:.,/lic,i.7.4. JA""' : -:.--ifIrcyARDi:,:jek:tbipliiNc.....,,I.;::',..C13,...;::',•0.tiMED_ ),..,;'. ..":::',7--11-,;-.,:,...,./-:::•,,..., ...
".:11‘\\ i' i",/ 't'yf •.. .,,, - ....,,..,,.,,,,),...,-,-.',41'''''' ' ''- - •;,)'', .1 (it,, ,t, i'
c
—PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CORRIDOR
.\'',('l i f ti 'PI l'i '1 '''' ' -'';';\-`, .'',,,' -- t''--.•',‘'.‘,t t' '\It tt i t ' ( '1'' ' • '' ' '- - ' t I '.'' ''fl ' ' 1=1 OVEIUAY REGULATIONS
,, ,f," •-,,
AgAk.,,,,,....t.„.,..4,7L,•,..„.,„.,,. _ ,,. , , ,:.,...-,,......,_ ...,,,,_,.._,.:,„
.1 A , ("$, I' ,,L...?7,1,-, ."--,'''' ',_),' -1,7 a --...----..--: -••-;•;-,,-.---:_.'2' .-'kt:. / ,.
),t
BUFFER YARDS OR OPEN SPACE
- '= .: `' '' .';‘,10.('t. 'k L' ,4'. .,'''.,''',' ''''''t••,,f''''',.-,•, --, ,iiiipi....„,.\s, 1.4.17-),,, )„t ',_.)tr ' r ,. ,.; 1.....1 0-,-,N--,,-„,,,,,.-t_.,.1 i.r71t, ,,j.,'',1 .,1„.,-..; --- .1-;"/
j
'' ' '' (' ) ' .' ' ' '''''.-..' '' 'rf.:1-i'''',.;) ; 'I 1 ''fj, C 1 ', ' 'cc- , •,-, .' ,f? ' (--.. .,---/-4,',-:pi ...--.. - ..,..--4.,,,,,--.',--:-.,-,r,,-...., ..,,-,,--li„., 1:3—PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE
• ' ‘i ' t\ is I/f"t'' ^ '''-'•'''.. '0'i , I I) ) \) ' ' c, ir- , 1 1 , t -•", •--- •-* l•"••=',”--. .---1. - .'',L i LAND USE PLAN AS LOW-MEDIUM
I I:i. , f>, '1,'1,/, ,..,,) ..... I.= 7 2. '- ,, / !Pi,/., ' ,',^1\ i I, ,,, f, '^ ,. t., , '..t,,: ,,f ---,,,,,-..!'.. „z•,' ''.',1'''`':,', I_. 1..,4'..,Iii-•.°'-'.`f
i • : . t ,4,!' .I 1 )( '• 'n• 1 _' :, ' h • --;., ,;^',.'?,';,,.,' I ,t‘', ...'f,.•, i ,,' ,, , (' , .,, t. - --:----, ),,,,.jtc,i.i,:-..:-...'-...„•fr--:•:.•:- -,4_:._•••...,'.Lt.!..'• v.,.7 RESIDENTIAL
i r ' '' ' 'I '' ' ' - ' . ' '"- " ' ' 5",'131.1-PER)ymiD(40PEN_§PACE)B.EPUIAFfit.- .,I",, i' :',..,0H2::---?1,!,f'.'Ill,7.1 ill,.,J.,,,f,,
, i
POTENTIAL WATERS OF TILE
., :',. ,.. r i..k /. I .,,,r. i Main/DOR n ay LULAY-.gittPlnAl!iCE 6, . '(). .`'... , 1 I /f i.,..),r, ,141 .,4,;'...I,, , ' ,;0' j• ri '1i'l\ 1‘ l' ' -,,,_, .. ""'""-,,,,, ,,s 'j,; ,','.1' I .1(:,y,.,, .. UNITED STATES
I .
.' .-.--.). i, ,,.:„; ? .; ,. •'IL i!, ,,,,, ,„1-,,,. .oh; ...„4. ,.., /II
". .::',k::.f:t4,--4:•!, ,''', '•, . , , tr.-, . i i 1,i .
TRACT III
OF til)171111AKI‘TARKANI
BUFFER YARD AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
JUNti 9,1997
I,Ill 20111121 Al'/(11 1•11,11NIS1•1/ I n^II ANNI•11 IINrr I VI"I I wham'
l'I'll' COIJNIN,1-1IXAS
I All 11•14 zi 1111,1111•NS,IN,'
,,,,,,„1,..,.,,,,, ",,'4",^‘I..,)",),, /•.1,ft ,f .f,..:'..'oi,' 0 '"t,:),I•ff'.' . „'44 kf'/..f/','/'•''''+'''''''''''. ''C''''I'''tni '.,t"/7
'r
lr''':,t''/Ai' ::/./'1 '//''"' 7"1 "''-'1,C., ',..:,-,:""i"i", " "''" ' .
' Mi,:'1,‘''',!:"".7Mi",::','",%":..%.:E ^I7 I r -1...r.'",,,,./.,. • -•47,,, ',' 1• .. ,
q-.',0.•', 114... i. 4:04,,u,,,, .1,,,,,,,.0.,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„:,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,„,;,,,,0 ,,,,4,....{1 i,'%1',:0 , '„;/'”At,?1,,,M,f,' ,,'',',.r r'rr I.,;; ' r 7';;,,/c I r/r.
''''''°;11/1/1:/r '..?'''''; ri•P'/i '/':'0;4701 / r ir7;7',/I' ,'',1'',','',, ' ',77'4,4'1' `,' ',', ,‘;•',,,"4/ ',', •1,41.44;,,,' ;,' ••',. ', ,'', • ','''•/,', ,•' ; ' ' ' ' ' ' - ' •
•
CONCEPT PLAN
•
This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in sections 30 and 41 (as
amended by Ordinance No. 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development.
The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract
quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting
quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is
seeking.
TRACT III
The following table demonstrates land uses categories permitted for each parcel within Tract III.
The attached exhibit "Concept Plan" further illustrates the general location of each parcel.
PARCEL Area LAND USE CATEGORIES
A 32.23 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, BI
B 77.76 ±AC CS, O1, 02, C1, C2, C3, B1, HC
(-0
C 63.85 ± AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2, B1, HC
D
26.98 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, B 1
SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS
• Ancillary residential uses RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 20.08 acres for the
entire Tract III Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac.
• Access to East Highland Street will be restricted to one full access location for residential
uses or one emergency "crash-gate" for CS, 01 and B1 uses.
• Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the
option to require a 300' building setback from the north property line at the site plan stage of
approval.
• Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council reserves the option to
require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and
TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school.
• Commercial uses (C1, C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50% of the gross parcel area
for Parcel IIIB or 50% of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIC.
June 9, 1997
96204301.R03 DR-17
1E-75
• The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a
•. miximum of four(4) stories or sixty (60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by
S.U.P. only.
• There will be no impervious coverage permitted in the flood plain with the exception of
pedestrian trails.
• The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape
Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping area will be
provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2) to four(4) plus 2%
for every story from five (5)to six (6).
QUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT
It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and
quality at the development plan stage for Tract III. The design guidelines will be available for
review at the time of development plan submittal.
i
•
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R0 DR-18
7F-70
•
•
• • •
M
I �1 —ON(B A SPIICIRC UTI'R LS IIC AND 01 USES IN MISONp!A SPPLIRC I/SF.R U IDENTIFED
`�'f I'KI.C.++F,„. IDENTIFIED POR PARIS.DI.. AREA LIALL BE RPSUUCMD POR rAR4'1.DID TDI Cf1Y(UUNC7L •PA.{�Vl.:la'D
,., THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES TO A MAXIMUM OP FOUR(I) MP
SETR TIP OMTI THE
YO NORTH
H
Jar ACRES THE OPTION IO REQUIRE A STORIES OR STXIY(RI)FELT. L/NE A THE
RITEOM LAN STAGE PROPERTY TLN!ACRES
PROPOSED ZONING XIB RUEDTNO SEDUCE FROM THE FIFTH AND SIXTH STORY une AT n1E SITE PLAN!FADE PROPOSED ZONING \
NON -RESIDEN11AL PAC' T E NORTH PROPERTY STAGE LINE AT OILY,BE PERMITTED BY sus. NON -RESIDENTIAL EBUSINSSPA E' \ /
THE NOR PUN KAOfl ONLY. 'ON -USE F'
(REST E BAREST,PARC 10'DUPPPI PARE REQUIRED
(RESIDFNYIAl,(S,01,Ell) 1r THE PROPERTYRESIDE TO no (R STING Z ,A Rl)
EXITNO ZONING - AO ',BUFFER YARD\OP.SPACE REQUIRED NORTH IS ^"^^` EOS11NG ZONING - AD,Q
EIOSIDIO LVD.- SEXED USE ADIAt]WI TO E MOIDANO STREET BEAM REQUIREMENTS TO BE EARS ENO LUD.- MIXED USE
I PROPOSED LUD.. MIXED USE DEAN MINEDSTAGE AT THE SITE PROPOSED LUD.- MIXED RISE
�I IIII, l I L , 1 LIRA- Elan LO UD.NIA AO . I - . _ I I�•�e■■ I1,,,•�, •1
IRA/ � _ 6 �lL ��]s _L► • —ci' ...l• I t�.J- . .-
. .Y�1 a T � �rr■•■���•
EE•� ti' .. � EAS'P IDGf D SC•ttlL�j �J [r��. 19 `r■ ■■ •
r c ZAAA:
igIFl1 �` amoviAND .��i (PROPOS 70'R.O.1 .• � I. .••• .;+Y d.� • .7,1R�',_��r'*I1 \
1 r4 UM. .�— � .�Appal.,ION \ \` O �`� J I� •
_ �`! r.�
•
Iqi °•OAnel w AOIEt O • 19,. ' i
...
I. O '404 •;iw 11 LOD.WAm UfR
ant 1111 WIFBI TAN .:. DT .. d O m ItI,L,07.... A� `__
i' ..RRmOA Y OBDE �' O• lOn-.A _ ._____
1
Lun. uan lifitamm.
.;,,,,•-:,,-;,-.:„;.-.,:-:,...:-,;,:-:
1 0 i50 JOO 1i00 r:+)L•NKibiliti ° '.)
,� Q IlA. r SCALE 1 600•Lu MB l,opP✓f1 �! ��. �� �''°P•.'o '> Luc.-1mc.Rrm o' O°• dilli-Cii..Ailk...eorksr'.71111:17..M.1 p f/ ,. l a T p/+�F�7�� y
LUD_ 1'�1. p•wiw• J4° • • 7\ • ! .. 0 Z ► �/ I i + 1 LEGEND Y�'Y NL.3�F'i••
_ •.. •r1 .. \`. • �
I, .' °o i �� \' 1` �. - - .e M c ,L-- I, .. ;'},�\\ M' pf I J—run- NUN.RSSIDrlmu'ULM,LSE
•Mil • BJi'
ili• • \�\ I O 1 11iiiNO • ,S U ,16 \ \ � (1 /•O• ..•�. ■ '' . '\` • ZDSII-. - A0.122 ir • -m'H - '� '�I —- I—31'DOYPPS YARD
1rfl•
// I ,�\ v?, o (6.G •VP. r Hr,.• ♦. ,LUD. MI>4'D 11$ � -O .I I I�ad•Xm w ' I—
� `CJ �.(,fl S'�^r./ , , •- �®.. • 1^ n. .- • LUD. NIXED u-se1{,-/ O.O° D'D1nrEe YARD
1 .°h♦ L Aiv, ., rppf0 I�- IDJ[®1. • • �. ' •A�.ii' + ..' 1I 04 . '- MP MIFFED YARD
' / ly'� '` I/i ..W.AREA
� •'�'*•- L-- _ i hM K F •
LO°' , .+I.11111
LUn —LAND 115E DESIGNATION
•V ` , _ iTL MAR —]ODIUM DENIM'RESIDENTIAL
•
.S ✓. ' i . .I . ... . ,... � 4 1 O �� � LIIR —LOW DENIM'RESIDENTIAL
AG —ZONING-ACNCUL7T/RL
\ T TAN ^, +�aMi • �. CS —ZONING-COMMT NIT•SERi7Q
�•• ar=r
1 \\\ `.� i.' yle'R O V111ii I w{���,• P.= —ZONING-N.AMd9 UNIT DEFELOIME.YT
i.� \`\� <Ytr. P 7 -� , W �•1-��' ' V • - , I �ctll 11. SPY —ZONING-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1 t • ,l !0� 1; IL, {1♦' • 1/ , r ifir
Iri'..-
+•l WI —ZONING-MULTI FAMILY RESIDENT•L
D \\\\\� p%- . \ r .�1P p o o r ir ��'a-il ' _ a —ZONING-OFFICE
1 . sal `. Yp/� ' CF —ZONING-GENERAL oW.AN
.. d& J� ,x ..t a ACRESTO EICF-ED AIM TM ENTIRE
SE FYTIIRE NON-RRFSmFMW.
Lti ir 11.1011 PUD.AND MULL NOT LTCZED 1B D.U/AC
s :: w• W ;farmer ° , I • o �� Nil B . '�/�'� o B ACCLSAT7 L YD Sf.RILL 9E RLTIIUCIKD TO ONE
• • 'I sr \. 1\��} .., II ( 1 EVE.EMERGENCY
LOCATION FOR ESS FOR Et
AND
R ONE
I� „ -1 715.1 ACCESS
CM ACCESS FOR D[OIAND CS USES
Q'B.
11 ONCE A SFEGPIC USER 15 IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL III•
ONCE A SPECIFIC IIC USER O IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL AEC HEATHS CITY COUNCIL RESERVES STIR OPTION TO REQUIRE
TIN(TRY MTUN[1.RESERVES TIM OPTION Ti REQUIRE A PARCiG.A 3123 A('RI'S A.Tar SETBACK PRIM ISIS NODS)PROPERTY FINE AT LE
v.16/11 FMN11 IIIY AT TIIII UM RAH ItA(111 IMAM nut SITE PION MOP.MOP.*H ITN
r)ur1MEr unR OF MI AND OUR II.IT Cl uyvullTm _.—__ PARLIIL E 77.76 I ACRES
03
AS A SCHOOL OWNER/AMII(ANI PLANNER/ENGINEER ONCE A SPD(IFIC IIC 77 IS IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL IIC Mt
FORCER.C 67ES S ACRES CITY COUNCIL RESERVES DIE OPTION TO REQUIRE A JOP•
INII RN:\t I111ADN'.\\"S AHD. (-lIN('FPRIAI.IN TT ITR0Y-RETERM CARTER•BURGESS INC PARc•EL D M.9♦I ACRES SETMCE AT THE ME PION STAGE FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY
NA AIRY :\NIT 1S111 111+. OI•1INED Al 111E 11M1: EEAI RROMI PARKWAY SUITE
DIAIIMIOI OR __- —._-.--- LINE O/1IU AND MI IR D U DE i'EL.OfA'D AS A xt/OOL
AA-ANNEX DSIS DER! MITRE IL
III -
IN'Iglu III IITI XIIN:\1II,N AEI, SSI7!PLAN I (9T1!L93aS �D1I1 GROSS STIL AREA AM.B2 ACRES COMMFXI WFS(Cl C2 AND CJMOYBNED MILL NUT EXCEEDAPPRI IVAI. MG WO L LU UAW An•ua•un 30; DIE OF RAND ARE!POR PARCEL MB OR PARCEL INC
TRACT NO. III
!ANTI 90947 NON—RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. ZONING REQUEST CONCEPT PLAN
C111 OP II()11AKE.TARRANF(YIUNIY.TEXAS
FO
y CARTER A IIl1ROliSY,INC. R 200.E2 ACRE PROPOSED PI ANNPD uurr DEVRIDPMRPIT
• -J„
'
✓ nnl , 'P 1',,,.4'7,f�xRAn.i k. .1r s:.., u.,.I...1.., _! L.,,,•.. ,w. 0'. J{+ 6+,.,a ,1 d �✓,A ,,y. r . ? ,(,,.ca,., (4� C�i,ld+A / �!1 A 11: 1 t ��M.x Y�� ;h � Y',i, (s � tt; r T�' �
,}�.
0I � �' " � ,A,, � �� ktA . � �6\;�, 1p� y � r.✓ I .i{, y; .v; ti✓r � f . :r � i w r�
,r .? , +11A A. tr s )l J0 ,fir 4 11A' 1 5, . i c.: i � ( 1tt a L4 •D.
. , S . ..e, „ 8 IlIP NI,II ,,, pI1e , xTaw , M ,', ,I ;�.,IE,; ,{ YI
•
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
•
0
Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the
State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities.
The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below:
STORM DRAINAGE
Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast-
southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to
route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways.
WATER DISTRIBUTION
An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution
main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and
S.H. 114. A system of 12" watermains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume
required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community.
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
SThe southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the
existing lift station on Carroll Avenue.
Eventually, the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to
the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station.
Currently, the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just
north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped south to the Carroll Avenue lift
station.
The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station.
This lift station is planned for summer 1997.
As a temporary measure until a force main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood, the
Quail Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and
south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. A more desirable scenario would be to direct flow from
the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a
gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street.
S
June 9, 199-
96204401.R03 B-1
7E 78
TRAFFIC STUDY
•
The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic
impacts.
The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the
time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified.
This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for
a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. The
concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts.
LAND USES
The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land
uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip
generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan.
STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROVEMENTS
TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the
• construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this
progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis.
PERIMETER STREETS
State Highway 114 will be the primary access into Tract III. Internal circulation patterns will
orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Kimball Avenue will be a secondary access
route. East Highland will only provide one full access for residential uses or an emergency
crash-gate for uses other than residential. •
THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS
This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A
representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning
the update of this Master Plan.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) at the development plan stage of process. At that stage
of development, the proposed users will be known and an accurate analysis of all traffic impacts
can be performed.
•
June 9'1997
96204401.R03 B-2
7F—79
RUNOFF STATEMENT
Timarron Commercial will detain 100% of the increase in runoff generated by future
development of these tracts.
All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will
work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project
on drainage.
•
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 B_3
• CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-222
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
APPROXIMATELY 200.822 ACRES SITUATED IN THE
RICHARD EADS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 481, TRACTS 1,
1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, AND 2C1, AND IN THE THOMAS
MAHAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1049,TRACTS 2A,2B,2B1,
3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, AND 5D, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG"
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A MIXED
USE BUSINESS PARK TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING USES:
"CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, "0-1" OFFICE
DISTRICT, "0-2" OFFICE DISTRICT, "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL
• COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, "B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, "HC"
HOTEL DISTRICT AND ANCILLARY RESIDENTIAL USES
(NOT EXCEEDING 20.08 ACRES) FROM THE "RE"
RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, "SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND "SF-20" SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
• adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
L:\TYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD ^ ✓�(
Pagel `
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural
District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
0 adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD
Page 2
411 a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
✓" of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
Being a 200.822 acre tract of land situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No.
481, Tracts 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B 1 A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan
Survey, Abstract No. 1049,Tracts 2A, 2B,2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D, and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein, from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial to "NR-
PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business
• Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office
District, "0-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2"
Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1"
Business Service Park District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses(not
exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single
Family Residential District, "SF-30" Single Family Residential District and "SF-20"
Single Family Residential District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B".
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD
Page 3 16'83
I L s of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997.
• MAYOR
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD r
Page 4 , ;qv
r 11
li 1 ,
, 1 i
w
i
'1 i I
1! 1,1:
' . ii i 11 ,
111 I'Il I /
t!,,,lip 4 11) l
• • I fi
c� �� �i �� � : e
ti •� • • ,
elk 411 It?' 4,......:,.. „0„.....0„..„ . ... , .1,..1.4.1..„, . : r ..., ,,
•
•
h • 0 �•��•iiP• • d Z • ° 2 4 �!
a 3
a .4'';',...-5.-./ ' '!-IN 11 i • •i: P Ait..!`" Nikt: !Ncl i i i),,, ipk. - ft. ...VP': ot 111Wk $0°-‘s ''.---.'111 111
-r< S, • "i7.,,-.Z........,_,: Or.R g a. eht-4...... ..._ ill ^,--°.0 ,,,,•, "\V40 ,z, ,., .k alikb pzi.!-
'cP IN gl cl...._• il iia. N • • ,•e- • st • ••
Ilzb qg 1 Aft r
,,. rwi,- eo, ' o
\\1:44;lil.. .."2:-'i,!: ',\',;:‘7)! \ .:..'41f1,!!,1 ' ‘ ‘``Y# kt
\ -,,, ,,,,,,i,,,-,-‘,„,,, ..,, \ ,,,
, \ . \ , ,„,
, ‘‘.- e \ , ,,, ....., \, :------.. , \ ki,. ,
„ ,, ..,... ____ ,,,__: .....,,,„ .. __ ,k,
irivm...- :vi------- ‘"-------
N!,:.:
, \ .. ... \
.:.,,,,,,,....:.',:,',..,,, ,„ ,‘ „ ,.,,.,,„.,,...,...... ___....
lilt a"'\111 *;Ikilliki
- \x, „,t '
t) --
r ��
y4
TIMARRON COMMERCIAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TRACT III
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
• PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES
• PERMITTED USES
• DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
• LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
• CONCEPT PLAN
EXHIBITS
• 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION
• BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
• CONCEPT PLAN
0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
• ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
• TRAFFIC STUDY
• RUNOFF STATEMENT
NO(
gt
4‘49�
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03
y '
• PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES
Timarron Land Corporation is requesting a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract III
in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park" development allowing a
variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure
compatibility of land uses through creative planning.
The Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning request will divide Tract III into four (4) separate parcels and
will allow the following land use categories for each:
PARCEL A
• Residential*
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
PARCEL B
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• 02 - Office District (Sec. 19)
• CI -Neighborhood Commercial District(Sec. 20)
• C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21)
• C3 - General Commercial District (Sec. 22)
• B l - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24)
• HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28)
PARCEL C
• CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8)
• 01 - Office District (Sec. 18)
• 02 - Office District (Sec. 19)
• C 1 - Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20)
• C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24)
• HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28)
IP
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-I
• PARCEL D
• Residential*
• CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8)
• 01 -Office District(Sec. 18)
• B 1 - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24)
* The Non-Residential PUD shall allow ancillary residential uses, limited to the zoning
classifications RE, SF 1 A, SF30 and SF20 up to 10%of the land in the NRPUD (20.08 acres).
The permitted accessory uses, specific use permits, special exception uses and development
regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SF 1 A, SF30, and SF20 zoning districts
set forth in Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
•
`r June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-2
r r
PERMITTED USES
It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the zoning
categories identified in this document(as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance No. 480) and shall specifically include those uses described as:
• "Permitted Uses"
• "Accessory Uses"
• "Specific Use Permits"
• "Special Exception Uses"
• Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not
been defined by current technology shall be subject to approval criteria established in
Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 44.4, as amended.
LAND USES
There are exceptions to the permitted uses. Those uses identified with a double asterisk (**)
shall require a Specific Use Permit(SUP).
Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract III.
RESIDENTIAL
I. Permitted Uses
1. RE - Single Family Residential Estate .
2. SF1A- Single Family Residential
3. SF-20 - Single Family Residential
4. SF-30 - Single Family Residential
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-3
CS- COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses - BY SUP ONLY
1. (DELETED)
** 2. Higher education institutions
** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers, and similar cultural facilities
** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs
(No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges)
5. (DELETED)
** 6. Public safety facilities
** 7. Religious institutions
** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities,
landfills, and transfer stations)
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-4 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses
A. Office Uses
1. Accounting and tax preparation
2. Adjustment and collection services
3. Advertising agencies
4. Architecture
5. Banking
6. Bill paying services
7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only)
8. Business holding and investment services
9. Chamber of Commerce
10. Chiropractors
11. Computer services
12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting
13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted)
14. Dentists
15. Duplication and mailing services
16. Employment services
• 17. Engineering
18. Finance
19. Interior design
20. Land surveying
21. Law
22. Management consultants
23. Optometrists
24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature
25. Physicians
26. Podiatrists
27. Psychiatrists
28. Psychologists
29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios
30. Real estate and insurance
31. Savings and Loan
32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices
33. Stenographic services
34. Title companies
35. Travel bureaus or services
36. Utility offices
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
• B. Community Facility Uses
** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks
** 2. Recreation and open space
** 3. Libraries
** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses(excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations)
** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-6 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses
A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District
B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities
AP
ip
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
II. Permitted Uses
A. Commercial Uses
1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature
2. Bakeries
3. Barber and beauty shops
4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats
** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores
6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets
7. Newsstands and/or bookstores
8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or"take-out"food establishments
9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops
B. Community Facility Uses
** 1. City hall,fire and police stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations).
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-8 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses
1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District
2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District
** 3. Cleaning,dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias
• 4. Antique shops
5. Retail sail bakeries
6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops
7. Blueprinting or photostating
8. Book or stationery stores
9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers
10. Christmas tree sales
11. Cigar or tobacco stores
** 12. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats
13. Confectionery stores
14. Custom dress making or millinery shops
15. Dancing schools
16. Day nurseries
17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations
18. Dog and cat hospitals (excluding large animal clinics)
19. Drug stores
20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed
eight thousand(8,000) square feet
** 21. Duplicating service,printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and
offset printing
** 22. Filling stations or service stations, operating with/without a convenience store
23. Financial institutions
24. Florist or gift shops
** 25. Frozen food lockers
26. Grocery stores and meat markets
27. Health service facilities
28. Jewelry stores
29. Leather and leather good shops
30. Optical goods
31. Photographs,portrait or camera shop and photo finishing
32. Radio and television sales and servicing
33. Restaurants,tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and"take-out" food restaurants
34. Shop repair services
35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair
36. Tailor
** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales
38. Variety stores
June 9,1997
96204401.R03 DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
1110
I. Permitted Uses
1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District
** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas
3. Coin and stamp shops
** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys
5. Commercial art galleries
** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto,
but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses
7. Department stores
8. Dry goods and notion stores
9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and
installation services (excluding propane tank sales)
10. Hardware, paint, and wallpaper stores
11. Hat shops
12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums
13. Hobby shops
14. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances
15. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities
16. (DELETED)
17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers (excluding cemeteries, crematories
and mausoleums)
18. Music or record shops
19.Nursery buildings
20. Pet shops
21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies
22. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services (excluding
propane tank sales)
23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs
24. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work
25. Skating rinks, ice and roller
** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises
consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use
permit(excluding sexually oriented businesses)
27. Toy stores
** 28. Upholstery shops - furniture
29. Variety stores
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-10 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
B-I BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses *
A. Office and Commercial Uses
1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District
2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations
** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly
4. Banks
5. Barber and beauty shops
6. Book and stationery stores
** 7. Computer manufacture and research
7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit
and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated
office complex
8. (DELETED)
** 9. Electronic manufacture
10. Funeral homes (excluding cemeteries, crematories, and mausoleums)
** 11. Lithograph, engraving,printing and publishing
** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment
** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments
14. Medical clinics
** 15. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies
** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing
17. Private schools
18. Professional/business schools
19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the
businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex
20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure
** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing
22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters)
** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly
24. Studios for training in fine arts
B. Community Facility Uses
** 1. City Hall, policy and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations)
* Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-1 1 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
0 "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT
I. Permitted Uses
** 1. Hotels and motels
** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned
** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned
** 4. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations)
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-12 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards
currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to
all new or amended ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following
exceptions:
BUILDING SETBACKS
Setbacks for Tract III land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No.
480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across the street from
residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the
comprehensive plan, the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks
shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where
it is adjacent to residential areas.
Setback Adjacent to
Residential
RES 35'*
CS 100' Min.*
01 100' Min.*
02 100' Min.
C 1 100' Min.
C2 100' Min.
C3 100' Min.
B 1 100' Min.*
HC 100' Min **
* Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the
option to require a 300' building setback from the north porperty line at the site plan stage of
approval.
** Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council resreves the option to
require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and
TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-13
BUILDING HEIGHTS
Maximum building heights for Tract III land uses shall be in accordance with the following table.
Maximum Building
Height
RES 35'
2.5 Stories
CS 35'
2.5 Stories
01 45'
2.5 Stories
02 90'*
6 Stories
Cl 45'
2.5 Stories
C2 45'
2.5 Stories
C3 45'
3 Stories
HC 90'*
6 Stories
B 1 45'
2.5 Stories
* The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a
maximum of four(4) stories or sixty (60)feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by
S.U.P. only.
IP
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-14
BUFFER YARDS
Perimeter buffer yards for Tract III shall comply with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No.
480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table:
Adjacent to E.
Highland,N. Kimball
and North Property Adjacent to
Line of Parcel III D Residential* Other
RES 50' 25' 25'
CS 50' 35' 25'
01 50' 35' 25'
02 N/A 35' 25'
Cl N/A 35' 25'
C2 N/A 35' 25'
C3 N/A 35' 25'
B 1 50' 35' 25'
HC N/A 35' 25'
*Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or
medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street
from Tract III.
Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard
type.
June 9, 1997 '
96204401.R03 DR-15
50' BUFFER YARD SECTION
0
ADJACENT TO N. KIMBALL AVENUE, E. HIGHLAND STREET
AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL IIID.
(IF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF PARCEL 1310 IS
RESIDENTIAL AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW)
f 50' BUFFER YARD L
0AP4i
dk..... , sCZ
0:
A.
cO
• a', i„,. .
,„,,,,
1171e7.-
iii
110, a.
-\ 0 :`` ` '
PARKING , •
-�'."`'� s-sm.,� Nr 3'-8'HT.
_ s jl MEANDERING
��' _ BERM
.__,J. 1 (AVG. 5'HT.)
3
IP .
JUNE 9, 1997
96204401.111
LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
LANDSCAPING
The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance
No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping will be provided in the
amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2)to four(4) plus 2% for every story
from five (5) to six (6).
OPEN SPACE
The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as
required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential
uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas.
A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the
location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located
according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be
performed at the development plan stage of the approval process. There will be no impervious
coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of pedestrian trails.
Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master
design guidelines that respond to tree preservation, at the development plan stage of the zoning
process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply
with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake, as those requirements are
developed.
The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed
buffer yards and open space for Tract III.
•
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 D R-16
7'�• ,. , r '7f y i m f/ .` `_yw�.w. �, -" y4"'. --74 7 y i-,;"'. , - i 'l4 _ a 7w "� �,
' f L.•,v 0'µy(., S ih8�0• ..1 ' r r rl,
•AtrT ;
ip ii.• .1 t ``�`~\ y 1`I iIY a *'r = ;��: .'/, �:f 1} 1t J4.5�pff of J ; l
• T4J 1' . �J`
a^st``".•: 1; � a j .e1% 7'J�' rc 1�}yj} ...'
/ II /1,' , - \i•
11
01'1 .k' vams.,r� `3yi f ' 3 71 '11ts r�- r,- �,'.... .+� ~ _ ti
is kbz ..n .y./ r 1 .;.. _i...i+9'
i
r; l`T i{e�e ►a /l�.. 7J , . r am" i• f -,lxf w - . f � � ,A.,, ..::4ii n't -,r
6_ C ' FRAD /OPEN' � _ i {-i; u t r 1r 25.BUFEYR I J :` `l/ 1,`/J`BY ORB DOR OYERLA 1' 1 ,
-; 11} •.`u� , r i I i ` •,t • .' ! K . - E i 1 ,t,�,.200 407 CigO
1 ` a
k, 1 ,.�-®/ ,+- >.., y rc�.str.T- ,7 7`• y VA*,
*, '10� r S
r r ; 1• •+ , a
eilj5,..
p` f 4 l a y,r r a j ; ,.
�� .• r/ r,,Q r
4 r G, , iti. \ S f; ,a ,r s,aI
rt.
4 ,11
i •'ss'N' ' ' • —. ti \ 1 i -",.'s ,r'",',..4 r. ;yfj,./ - i , ,...,:...- ; .. - '� �� � 'v� 1�
Cq--:.'�.1,k. ':1r' / t � 2+ .i J"� i ill lr!f,11.1 t J t- 'Y•.�.::::7._ i, .•,, 1
1p `-i t � '`\ '��� /jr:J1liijj rT y�r " , `_�'' �s` I�1+ t I
/Z4_ :,,y`'�' ' r ,/1t `• ✓ ,.r��r•f'0/�!,r!%' { r r # �"' , �r'� 1 7 f,1 i
Yp-S-7' ` \\ l.ko,.I
- ( •• y.\•.--....,.• i`,i ;#�f ice , f ,` '. 7/ 5';y.%% ir":'j
,"i'• ,• . ";
0 )l ga d K..+l 1- \: -- !;2Y i y :" )/ E° 'i " 1 1 11 J f
-,.t
\ NI y
r At1� /1 �• + ,'1/ • J ., ��1 •I j v� � -� �, -7„ 1 i;�•J C:
' / ', r `` `, 3`11 //r- / ` _.4 r, 'fir `>
ifi/i / • = aNl
) 1 k (.k, \ 1 ,ki,:.7i.,Z,%,., ;:i.i,:•,,,,,;,1 f .-•?1, 4i
�, 11 ( � ,} r)`� `� .: �;:. LEGEND
• t•t ! 1, _ ,, r 1; ) �,,�•$ r* — PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CORRIDOR
\' _C `fir (�,
j�,�`,(7� �'% t •� \` OVERLAY REGULATIONS
, tJ )�r ,.?'V,r,,,..„,), ,r//)1 )((t,'. ( SV-"I
/ �---�*�*'.,•, — AREAS TO BE PRESERVED AS
Pc i , II �1� � ••4•� BUFFER YARDS OR OPEN SPACE
-''-Q �' •
, • 1 j _ ' i .%: — PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE
ier "*7 Y 1/f1!.`. )1 1 '�1';r LAND USE PLAN AS LOW—MEDIUM
n o '/.•r 1.1; ?i l LI !(u / \ i-/ RESIDENTIAL
r% '<; '{ I' ( r " fc. J"• 11:—
i — — — POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE
�� -:_= �, I -„{jjj����f ,` '%'JJ//-/," -l"_ UNITED STATES
\ ,,,/
///A
1
? . L ., •
(.,,,((
, .., ..... ,..... ......,
, .
......
((( TRACT III
JUNE 9,1997 ZD AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS
CARTER & BURGESS,INC. FOR 200.822 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
IT I 11/I A RR C A L
CONCEPT PLAN
This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in sections 30 and 41 (as
amended by Ordinance No. 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development.
The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract
quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting
quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is
seeking.
TRACT III
The following table demonstrates land uses categories permitted for each parcel within Tract III.
The attached exhibit"Concept Plan"further illustrates the general location of each parcel.
PARCEL Area LAND USE CATEGORIES
A 32.23 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, BI
B 77.76 ± AC CS, 01, 02, CI, C2, C3, B1, HC
c' 63.85 ± AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2, B1, HC
D 26.98 t AC Residential, CS, 01, B1
SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS
• Ancillary residential uses RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 20.08 acres for the
entire Tract III Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac.
• Access to East Highland Street will be restricted to one full access location for residential
uses or one emergency "crash-gate" for CS, 01 and B 1 uses.
• Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID,the City Council reserves the
option to require a 300' building setback from the north property line at the site plan stage of
approval.
• Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council reserves the option to
require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and
TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school.
• Commercial uses(C1, C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50%of the gross parcel area
for Parcel IIIB or 50% of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIC.
June 9, 1997 -i
96204401.R03 DR-17
• The northwest area ofL Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a
miximum of four(4) stories or sixty(60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by
S.U.P. only.
• There will be no impervious coverage permitted in the flood plain with the exception of
pedestrian trails.
• The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape
Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping area will be
provided in the amount of 1%of the lot area for every story from two(2)to four(4)plus 2%
for every story from five (5)to six(6).
QUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT
It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and
quality at the development plan stage for Tract III. The design guidelines will be available for
review at the time of development plan submittal.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 DR-18
111 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the
State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities.
The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below:
STORM DRAINAGE
Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast-
southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to
route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways.
WATER DISTRIBUTION
An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution
main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and
S.H. 114. A system of 12" watermains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume
required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community.
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
The southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the
existing lift station on Carroll Avenue.
Eventually,the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to
the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station.
Currently, the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just
north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped south to the Carroll Avenue lift
station.
The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station.
This lift station is planned for summer 1997.
As a temporary measure until a force main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood, the
Quail Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and
south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. A more desirable scenario would be to direct flow from
the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a
gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 B-1
TRAFFIC STUDY
The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic
impacts.
The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the
time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified.
This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for
a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. The
concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts.
LAND USES
The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land
uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip
generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan.
STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROVEMENTS
,40) TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the
construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this
progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis.
PERIMETER STREETS
State Highway 114 will be the primary access into Tract III. Internal circulation patterns will
orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Kimball Avenue will be a secondary access
route. East Highland will only provide one full access for residential uses or an emergency
'crash-gate for uses other than residential.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS
This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A
representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning
the update of this Master Plan.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)at the development plan stage of process. At that stage
of development,the proposed users will be known and an accurate analysis of all traffic impacts
can be performed.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 B-2
RUNOFF STATEMENT
Timarron Commercial will detain 100% of the increase in runoff generated by future
development of these tracts.
All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will
work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project
on drainage.
June 9, 1997
96204401.R03 B-3
r
City of Southlake,Texas
• STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA97-056 PROJECT: Development Plan - Timarron Addition, Village J
STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Development Plan of Timarron Addition, Village J on property
legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall
Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7,
a portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2,
Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract "
LOCATION: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and
East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East
Continental Boulevard
OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra - Timarron, L.P.
• CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6)
RESPONSES: None
P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved(4-0-1) subject to Development Plan Review
Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Development Plan Review
Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those
requirements addressed in the attached Development Plan Review
Summary No. 2 dated June 13, 1997.
L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-056SP.W PD
•
. . ...
'''. ' • •-•
3 5i L .--•, 1 _ „ . .
u40-.5
7` ,itt. ... : I's, • ! ---, ---1.-:-. i --
l'.......E0 . i s " '0 • ;
IC ille71.4
3f
I 3r1 302A,341 IT 104 3C i
--. -
• BS a-t.=1;Fr.•...4-4 i 4a I.r_..t A e A I_..
IC .-..--....--• •--,. ..., SC 3A 3AI 3C 30
V -2 001 3C2
PA S:S01 Y SE 50 s. 7.66 4G 40
‘ti H ge• L ..4.$50,1 I"3 k 5:.8.?Ac 3.56 At
Ac
'0 6 Ac ...' 1% Ac .57 A' s
I ri 91 . k
' 1‘ 1- I.1
\) 'CID XI
C IS Asf ..
L...
- -I
3:4 ....,-.1.711 H r` 2211 A.0
i ; 30 302
•..1 .- "1.---- 5 At ) I 'IN' s Ct55 SO1 .". I ..../
••
1
c...--....-.j•I.2...-- I'I•...•...4 C OA . a ... .,t.,.v.
, Y E.61.ZA Zi''2AID• :,;' eq14.
AINV / 2
. - - 423. u1 41 , •
V' s
1 I I 31 ,..1.1..• ,
I
• • •'. .
.*.,'. 30 51p,. ,,,..cc...,i•, gil, . ••
! 1 ‘......S.• .1d/ai IMAM -14 ; ,
f VI jiattpi 21 Acs •
) 4E1 ft,..
..r...,_,
ir 4x
[ IlL
ICI (33
.-7
1....•
4 48 ,1t1011.
4 Ac
31 I I P.:C., 25 znA rn .._
5UV4*c.
r L))
t : ,
• ...92_ •:e
• Y
M -
7.1
, ...,_
OBEDI fil W ... 'NIGHT
...,
.,..ii.s.s.: rrrrit...5. 5.Rst•-r. A-41411A .
I ""•'••••• .i
50.71 Ac '
20 k •0'.
..
,--. ...
...
2t 2c I 2C2Av. 2:-.;.4-'i ..
-,., s..,
OtiLL ILL'14
Kii- r • '' i
Ii_ii,_?-....,,..„,„1._,. .44tXS,••••111 t"''' - tInge.
g I 1pilz:21_,iicallei rx. .1.. 4,
, %
.."--.."'" /
'------, - . ‘r rut Af: IMAir i i • 1 ...
......
. ,0 1);. 4 Ac 4 Ac .....•
•''.:- , .-.il , ! I ! V. V. V ..•
..i-i-4-4-• 1-;
IHAPA aulami-RMistc.6.1i, • ';-.- • .,
• .11..i.r..1.
.
SAW.' 44•:•.141 .T. . L. .- v: . ••,,L. 11 a a Iv. 'L
• • ., .' 1 ... 4C
-44x1?1-","'"' i 1
! ! 1 i " -i- t. 49s. ',....X:2 ••••1" 1 .., .ir.k..ir •--".....
' ' i i i i I) ./L I k:1 .., .. • i ' • .\‘...,:,7‹:,:i -.1- @ 1 ! • ''• 03
....,...4,...o, ._.
I 45C - . iii ,L.:, G',•°'..- ._i- za.-..:,..* 1
/
10 ' ....,
kl:0 1 •
- .- ----; -.4- - /ILI 7_ . „
, ..
. •
. 4A
•
• I I I ,i
43,,
Figi ‘,1'-i-•-..''.. . I sc, ,
• .":7-- 0` .i.ai. ..,
4 At . 1111"
1', I • i •- • . i .° • .. . . 1 , UN ..,
-
.... 1\A • •: .1.15"akiriellil 0, Weir . 1
N,,• !/ .....r 6.I.
, It.,W.:'. . ". .1 .......1.40 ''... .. . •
i i iF. ,i •Grtirli.!
.17.1,.....•,....S .4•., .4.• 1 i
a .42..."r614114144,41pt."11111.1eite9411. "aIII.4'.4 ganIMMIIC,..". I
7,716c :1
1 1 Ark" ,g...... i J. '' •••••••-,.•/-64Z1:' ‘,-.. ..Lil.• . . .. • ..e ..
1•att..44 Tama° ..... .,.. ! .4 • '4*.
IA te g A *-1C,0*---- i. 5,•:.'i • 1-1/10. • " ' '‘. Vglifig.4101
,, Otv-• 1 F,.,...:. . ,... • • •• • • .,,.,,,, . • !PIM/ a .
L.- -,---
---\r--- ..1 -.-7 .. - • , • `1..
_
----- :,,, AINIMMUMHIE
-
I - I 1,. fi I.,- ... ...
.,•^. W :::,,,•••-**". ea *-1-.-k- i 1 x....: • 54. Mnh7-r----:---7. Rims IA 1 It
,.; ii . iii11111 , I i .
grpi•.,..f...... !....7.• .."3".T•704 * . •/* I s . * ........4‘s*ATINNirTC -Pill • - gi .1
! -4-1-• .:i. . . -'1. v•-•!-- --4 i 1 I Lit.A0. N)pook-i ' i i i i • ' V11111 -- li . 2 . .1.40R 1
--,-.,
-,4".•-• i ' I i I • .• '''.'t ., , ' 'fr- -.-_•. --..--...--t- IT‘rt.4-1, -,.• -Tteliza-÷.• ; 1-. :,. 2A3 ' ;
-'' •.., s'-‘.'"'''llikliiv......170' .,a, ..,... . . 1 ! 3. i -----mC Zee.- . i
-. ,. MEMO
-- •., .---
•e- i ., •-• ,1 a...-(_.ii _. -. /-- . . . -• .-i,,, .-i.-'N.A ., %.,..•..-<. .,. ., _;. .. / ,...., -.:- \T.,-,,_ m...1 .- ,.\---1 -
-17.?-4-• l''-i.: - . ,-.....,;- g -• • '' -. , , .-, • --,„,....%_.- .1 - ..14 ••••.- '•••,.. • ; ' . • ',' 4, Ord i .
;• •4,•
. --I• ,:./., • -- •'- ,"' -r• ._ 1.- * -•: t-5- ...‘ , ....t..- *%.," .: T 4. ,.I-....I . -ti.1.Z •'•;.':-` ••••• •
I i,,A„ ,tty:- •- •III-. -!.:1
..."-i --- •-V-"- -.1--(?•••• g •i ••'4'' U ,••••••;:4'4 • • 4•
-4-•-j-, (.......... ..- Ili:, ;...?i..,v: It • t•- .-1 . •.•. -- ---t I i k 4., • *;, *! . "...... . i ..•X•4;.. .'4"...."4443Pum 7•'''' k
,... ,,,t.41sminig"a•q•-.•X. ;,:. ,- 5.,; •, .......1......"" •'•
r.
• TRO!E , -, st-a -Y..Uz.r. • -::-.W...... ' ' 1 " ., ! 1 1
a-- ..., -.i.:5-i,,-,- .40) r-•- •• ,
‘,.. , i i 1 ' i i .-k: ,:: 's. .3 • . •
0404i“ I-. orp- -----. ...--- 7,.-•
. ils-ri• "
,-.'. ‘..h.'' '•W 4 • :
Ns . n t
,,, i 1.• ,,.i.--.'f.4 . y•:: ...A.:: • . 1..L. WAEOLIG1 - ,.n..tyli;:r. T •• • . -..• .. •
. -.1-•,',, •-"••- ---fi • C->4,•• -/-7--, : 4' ___ .. .
•- ,rf,,,14.--i 7 •-. p '
`'or ., . ; ' ,... ••-':-VP,' . - 7 : -=.-7---•
•
tfr C) . . .e......... .....y..,,r- l !g. ,.. . ; •
.44.., - 1'. 4. ea.;17',. •,,,.. I q..._$1-. .4-• lizi •-•I---;4 . ., •• . ,
, . 6... k rh ,i,1:::,. • .7..:.-.A.7....-..iTs-1 *II...
',c,,!•.,. . 4417-. .7,4‘. 1•s<Isei. . \s‘ , . -.,. I V
j
'•-•%.. / N. .\)
„ ..,-, • • •411.k•C 4.....-.: • \‘'t Tv 11 •• ..t," .
..,.. , ....../e• .4 e APT.
-. • '
IG -.•. • I'V -:.: ..... . ,
%.! / .1 . ' ), •' I . ......,,,--,. ...,G.7.:, _..
is.i•, t..... cii. . 6-L.g.:;--- :-.•?....;:,. • .- -. i
. P •
f ., '7'" i • ._. . ...._
, , • .. ...z.*ec.• ,..--.,-
. 4...-...--...--", A , c:t. .....,- .- •
.
.
r-5-K7. i IQ. . i .I. • - '-'74. 4,11414- ,.. .- ....-- .--.!,0••• 7 16 AC
• ..::”..., .4‘ •'•:4-' • ••? •' pre.
..,,- •,...... -„: , .,•
..-) 1 28 , ,...\/ .4- • I IA I : i :•..'
1 i ! .:._::,
'31' l, \ 3.1 • ! A ! i ONR c ri , r_ Nill- .....• -,
•••:,um>. ' tsioLly 1 i
•IA _. 1. ..-.:-.„....1 ..„.,.........„
Rim ?; ', i 1
..••••••t;31:-.3 - t 304 ,
I ,1-.,.,
W.M. On,\i ENP6H7-
....,1__.
L t---- ------ -r---'1-...\\,.-r,' - TRACT MAP •
- -,
•
1 City of Southiake
S Timarron „ „Village J
I I -„,„.____,--,_ _ ,
- __
N •
. ' 161111 I\ . 1
- .. I
)* /
010111111101111M it,• 1IIII lel
v7410, 'Q,
\i6 A ', . 40
- V t
Elf"
a f*
111
Ai
\I ''
•
ti
'---'111 ,Ci\,„;\........,' HN '
4Ail , ...
\ ;- ,
V. 0
. a
. .
Ilk .
4 e __ . „
,..„.
,• , ,,
• A k
SDISCLAIMER Legend ,
-
This data hat been coepged for The
l Timarron Village "J"
pahcr this Information.Ewy Mort to Imre w:gi:aor L N O Scale
nmplied a;%s
200' Buffer Area
of said data. 1 F- , Parcels Within 200' Buffer Public Works - GIS
•
• Timarron Village J Adjacent Land Owners and Zoning
29-May-97
# PIDN Owner Name
01 42168C 24 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
02 42168C 24 4 NEWPORT CLASSIC HOME
03 42168C 24 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
04 A1037 2A01 20 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
05 42168C 24 15 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
06 42168C 24 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
07 42164C 37 6 LEEPER, ROBERT
08 42164C 37 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
09 42164C 37 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
10 42164C 37 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
11 42164C 37 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
12 42164C 37 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
13 42164C 38 12 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
• 14 42164C 38 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
15 42164C 38 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
16 42164C 38 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
17 42164C 38 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
18 42164C 38 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
19 42164C 38 6 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
20 42164C 38 7 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
21 42164C 38 11 D&D HOMES INC,
22 42164C 38 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
23 42164C 38 9 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
24 42164C 38 8 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
25 42164C 38 38 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
26 42164C 38 39 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
27 42164C 38 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
28 42164C 38 41 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
29 42164C 38 42 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
30 42164C 38 43 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
• 1
ALL ZONING IS PUD NO. 1
SPIN ' 9 LAURA MIKLOSKO
• . •
0 .
February 21,1997
Comparison of Planned Unit Development Regulations
Page 1 General Lot Size Requirements Yard Requirements Building Criteria
T
Total Gross Residential Acres I Min.Lot Avg.Lot Min. Min. Front Side Side Rear Minimum Maximum Maximum
j` #of Acres Density %Open Size Size Width Depth Yard Yard Yard Yard Floor Building Lot
Lots Space (Adjacent Area Height Coverage
to$treef
' r r
SF-20 N/A N/A Maximum of N/A 20,000 sq.ft. N/A 100' 125' 35' 35'unless 15' 40' 'A'-1,B00 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
2.18 D.U./acre platted (35'cul-de- 'B'-1,500 sq.ft. 35'max.
'/ otherwise sac)
y(c SF-1A N/A N/A Maximum of N/A 43,560 sq.ft. N/A 100' 125' 40' 40'unless 20' 40' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 20%
�\ 1.00 D.U./acre platted 35'max.
otherwise
P.U.D.REGULATIONS
Coventry 101 103.76 1.0 D.U./acre 14 acres 20,000 sq.ft. N/A 100' 120' 35' 20' 15' 35' 2,700 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
101 units 13% (43,560') (85'in cul- (230'on (40'on (20'on lots (100'on 35'max. (20-30K)
(30,0002) de-sac) P'ville) >40,000 >30,000 P'ville) 20%>30K
sq.ft.lot) sq.ft.)
Lonesome Dove Estates 151 82.4 1.82 D.U./acre 7.976 12,350 sq.ft. N/A 95' 120' 25' 20' 10' 20' 60%are 2.5 stories 35
150 units acres (15%) (85'in cul- (135'on (45'on >2,300 sq.ft. 35'max.
-Phase I 9.68% (26,650 sq.ft. de-sac) Burney, Carroll) 20%=2,100-2,200,
-Phase II 79 47.86 78 uints on Carroll) L.Dove) 20%=2,201-2,300
72 34.54 72 units
Monticello 109 129.92 0.82 D.U./acre 48.93 20,000 sq.ft. 27,100 sq.ft. 90' 125' 30'min. 20' 10' 20' 3,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories N/A
105 units acres (35'min. (25'reverse 35'max.
-Phase I 39% 50%lots) frontage)
-Phase II 56 46.59 55 units
-Phase III 25 44.05 23 units
28 39.28 27 units
Monticello Estates 124 71.77 1.69 D.U./acre 9.5 acres 12,000 sq.ft. 16,611 sq.ft. 100' 120' 25'min. 20' 10' 20' 1,800 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
(Timber Lake Dev.Regs.) 117 units 13.2% (mid.pt.) (mid.pt.) 35'max.
-Phase I
-Phase II 76 45.704 1.58/72 units
48 26.044 1.73/45 units
Myers Meadow 272 141.94 1.9 D.U./acre Min.14.3 13,000 sq.ft. 15,000+sq. 85' 120' 30' 20' 10' 25' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories
268 units acres (30,000 sq.ft. ft. (125' mid. >30'(50%) (25'reverse (40'adj. (2,500 sq.ft.adj. 35'max.
10% adj.to C.T.H.) pt.)' frontage) to C.T.H.) to C.T.H.)
-Phase I 89 55.24 87 units
-Phaso II 117 42.52 115 units
-Phase Ill 98 44.18 96 unlls
3
. • •
7
Page 2 General Lot Size Requirements Yard Requirements Building Criteria
Total Gross Residential Acres/ Min.Lot Avg.Lot Min. Min. Front Side Side Rear Minimum Maximum Maximum
#of Acres Density %Open Size Size Width Depth Yard Yard Yard Yard Floor Building Lot
Lots Space (Adjacent Area Height Coverage
to Streeti r
Stone Lakes 343 201.35 1.82 D.U./acre Not less 12,000 sq.ft. 16,944 sq.ft. 100' 120' 30' 20' 10' 20' 1,800 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
337 units than 10% 35'max.
-Phase I
-Phase II 154 73.71 151 units
-Phase Ill 60 47.71 58 units
-Phase IV 81 37.09 80 units
-Phase V 47 41.56 47 units
1 1.28 1 unit
Timarron Phase I 167 102.48 161 units 16.13 12,000 sq.ft. N/A 85'(90%) 120' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
r. acres 50'-85' (35'for 10'as a 35'max.
min.10% (10%) <50%) rule
-The Highlands I 68 32.81 2.01/66 units 2.78/8.5% 100'@ Houses>
-Bent Creek I 99 69.67 1.36/95 units 13.4/19.2% mid.pt. 20'apart
Timarron Phase II 124 81.44 117 units 10.1 acres 12,000 sq.ft. N/A 85'(90%) 120' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
50'-85' (35'for 10'as a 35'max.
The Highlands II (10%) <50%) rule
9 33 16.81 1.90/32 units 0.78/4.6% 100'@ Houses>
-Bent Creek II 58 41.85 1.31/55 units 7.18/17.2% mid.pt. 20'apart
-Estates at Bent Creek 33 22.78 1.32/30 units 4.72/20.7%
I
Timarron Phase III° 240 300.82 1.92 D.UJacre 20.0/6.65%
201 107.33 1.8 D.U./acre 18/17%
193 units
*•• .
Glendover 56 38.86 1.36 D.U./acre 7.23 acres 15,000 sq.ft. 15,500 sq.ft. 85'(90%) 150' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,600 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%
(Product Type A) 53 units 18.6% 50'-85' (35'for Houses> 35'max.
(10%) <50%) 20'apart
-Wyndsor Creek 87 40.74 2.06 D.U./acre 5.02 acres 11,250 sq.ft. 11,500 sq.ft. 85'(90%) 125' 25' 10' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%(50%)
(Product Type B) 84 units 2.06% 50'-85' (35'for Houses> 35'max. 35'%(50%)
(10%) <50%) 20'apart
-Brenwyck 1 58 27.63 2.03 D.UJacre 5.24 acres 10,500 sq.ft. 11,000 sq.ft. 75'(90%) 120' 20' 10' 5'(25%) 20' 2,200 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 45%(50%)
(Product Type C) 56 units 19.0% 50'-75' (25'for Houses> 35'max. 35%(50%)
(10%) <50%) 15'apart
-Product TY�e D 34 10.4 3.26 D.UJacre 0.29 acres 6,000 sq.ft. 7,200 sq.ft. 50'(45%) 100' 15' 10' Zero lot 20' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 50%(25%)
(Revised by o( 2.8% >60'(55•%) line(10' 35'max. 40%(75%)
......*
min.13A (75%),40'
Villas) units) max.(25%)
• TIMARRON
VILLAGE "J"
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
PR_QpUCT A
agui auELOPMENT REC t IREMENJ
Height: Thirty-five feet (35') maximum. No building structure shall exceed
two and one-half(2 Yz ) stories.
Depth of Front Yard: Twenty-five feet (25') minimum - no more than 50% of the lots will
have front yards less than thirty-five feet (35').
Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20') feet minimum.
Width of Side Yard: Five feet (5') minimum on no more than 25% of lots and ten feet
(10') minimum on remaining 75% of lots. No house may be closer
than twenty feet (20') to adjacent house.
• Width of Side Yard
adjacent to Street: Twenty (20') feet minimum.
Lot Width: Eighty-five (85') foot minimum lot width on 90% of the tots: 10% of
the lots may have lot widths at the front setback line that vary
from fifty feet (50') to eighty-five feet (85').
Lot Depth: One hundred fifty (120') feet minimum.
Lot Size: Fifteen thousand (15,000) S.F. minimum .
Fifteen thousand, five hundred (15,500) S.F. average.
Maximum Lot Coverage: 30%
Minimum Floor Area: 2,600 S.F.
970002 CTM Page 1 of 2
4.0\
REC'D MAY 2 91997
•
PRODUCT D
REGJJLATION PROPOSED CRITERIA
Height: Forty (40) foot maximum (up to 25% of the lots); thirty-five
(35) foot maximum (up to 75% of the lots); no building or
structure shall exceed two and one-half(2 % ) stones.
Depth of Front Yard: Fifteen (15') feet minimum.
Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20') feet minimum.
Width of Side Yard: Zero lot line allowed with 10' minimum between units.
Width of Side Yard
Adjacent to Street Ten (10') feet minimum.
Lot Width: No more than 45% of the total lots shall have a minimum
lot width of fifty feet (50'), with the remaining lots to have a
minimum lot width of sixty feet (60') or greater.
• Lot Depth:
One hundred (100') feet minimum.
Lot Size: Six thousand (6,000) S.F. minimum
Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% (up to 25% of the lots)' 40% (up to 75% of the lots).
Minimum Floor Area: 2,000 S.F.
Note: A private access and maintenance easement shall be provided adjacent to all lot lines
intended as 'zero" lot lines.
970002.CTM Page 2 of 2
REC'D MAY 2 91997
City of Southlake, Texas
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
1111ase No.: ZA 97-056 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97
Project Name: Development Plan - Timarron Addition, Village "J" being 56.814 acres situated in the
Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Westerra Timarron, L.P. Carter& Burgess, Inc.
7605 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250
McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, TX 75247
Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145
Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447 Attn: Todd Jansen
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. Place the City case number"ZA 97-056" in the lower right hand corner of the plan.
2. Show and label any adjacent traveled roadway widths (Eagle Bend, Villa Crossing).
411). Show and label any off-site existing easements.
4. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description:
A. In the 14th call from the beginning, correct the block number for". . . the corner in the
northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 11F of said Timarron Golf Course. . ." to '`. . . Lot 1,
Block 1. . ."
B. Correct the discrepancy for the bearing between the boundary call and the legal description
for the first call from the beginning.
5. The following are needed with regard to adjacent properties:
A. Label Lot 1, Block 1 of Timarron Golf Course to the west/northwest of the site also.
B. Show and label the type & size of each adjacent easement on the Golf Course. Also, label
the type, size & deed record of the 15' U.E. and 15' A.E. filed by separate instruments
which cross the Golf Course and the site. Show and label any easements to be abandoned.
C. Correct the lotting for the southernmost portion of Block 38, Crescent Royal Addition,
• specifically Lot 43. Increase the font size of the lot and block numbers for the sake of
legibility and label Common Green 44. Show and label the type and size of all existing
easements on Crescent Royal which are adjacent to the site (D.E., U.E., and M.&A.E.).
City of South lake,Texas
* If the intention on Lot 38, Blk. 62 is for frontage to be on Street"A", then the lot line adjacent to
Street "A" must be of a lesser width than the lot line adjacent to Eagle Bend.
* Provide load and access width for the bridge/30' common access easement between Lots 15 & 16,
Block 62 in compliance with Fire Department requirements. (Ord. 480, Sec. 4.2, "Frontage") For
questions, contact Vicki Hess, Fire Safety Inspector, at (817) 481-5581, ext. 737.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Carter and Burgess, Todd Jansen
Westerra-Timarron L.P., Steve Yetts
L:\W P-FI LES\RE V\97\97056DP2.W PD
•
•
� l ' IC1
0 0 410 .
.............
„ „„[:',7,.;,, - , ; , , ; Eirvc.1.-,:z.i.:;:..,;.17,-...,:.:..,:z.:,....i.,.-r,I..., i.:-..-111.1.•-,is 4.11:4"••""—-.-..
\ - . ,,, '''4111''" S , '"t''',.., , .1,1:7,21:41i,.....2.,^...".z.I.:::.7./:-:.:.•:tr.:1-1;.•311. LI:411:4v 4.r.:::"—'.—— —
„,:,- NDtro?"..°14.,,,,. ,, y,',*.', ,'..', s
:• ....17,-A.F.,.,..1.-,.....3z..,...,..../.—, ..,It....,........... N
1 'i F if•' - Y n:,/..Yttki":::".V7.7".4...14.-'43.713Z'•••• •••'-'•'- ...„=.,..,.„.11...4,,..,,,,,r,..-—
-,-•fl. .
•,
. /"'.• _ . r,, •-• •,;-•\. l'.../ ,!.;," ; l'''I
IJ
,,....4...), .01.....„......j..--/ 127."'''14".1111.-'‘'‘....'.."''''''..‘"..''''" i..trrilt....-.9 4.71:7.''•'''''''"""-.
1.2;n1441,11•4.1.4,.'""'•" '''•". L44.,i..11-J t _,- ig _
,„,,,,,r,1,7r,;?•,.., .4 .,, , , _
i..r.t.:::...i•pr,r.••.--.::::'•••••••••••--- ::::::::.21'.-al Lrca.:',:"*•-••••—---. Ta,,,,,,,46.,.,T .-...-"*!;„/-•#'--/ -:-Alt-ls•-:...PCI!f,OF OE.R.F.0 fr. .:.i ,..,\ i,, ',v,.::,'",'..- • '
!a.:v....o.w.r.ttr..-".••-----
' ' - • - ,...is--' /. '-'•: :t.-: i i..•:.-vir:..:xtr•r........-•-•-•----- i.r.v.•,:.,:.',17,1'.:iiiiir••----- '',..if kr•••r•---'..p_:,',';;;-i27- --.-j,' -;- RI
LOCAT1001 WP
, ' ' --..,co...•Berls ''.: 1 .- :,' , 'i. . - ' . ' izzr.t.Linr.r.w...•••••-•---•••••••
__
'"'''''' "'•• ........,......
,r , , ?.'!. itt.. 1 ..,•,..; ,,ii• \.' ..... . , :\ i
LS,"1:1A,11/....1.7 • "ZZLT`''""":61:7.7'"7 27'' '' '"''".• ...., ...... „I ..... .... •••••• = :4.:ti 7,-,.?i,t(tit-,:-: •::;)' ::1-3:_,,,::•:.:•... V. ,,41 .)t‘4V, ::•..;;.„,„7:f7.°'F‘,..‘;,.:•,, )1 i .,.., . ,I, ` ,....,,,,,,..poz.-....”•••"-----
.. .
..... ..... _ .. .. ..
-.- RODUCT U4'71 s,..1-9 r-TAIr'"."'""-— ......... .. ..... .....
- "
, i ':., .,,-., •'.. , 1,'\ "-ti'' • ''' '.1,`.-I ''''••,'-:.'.:;:-';; ,•LV- . - '• :".7:.114•27alf.:.-Fati,s7.4-r-7::: LRRISO
'U---'17:7-A' C2,0',' ...---L!A...,..:11',..,..-174'..:-.,,,174..-:;.:,.,•--.4, ....... .. ..._. — ,... .. - -
CAR
. Civtl: : ....--,' .i.' 1 ) 1.,'.-'.t'... ;'""_ RZ,'%. .:. ,.' ''.•''',„,‘;‘',,,,;:.,'0 s,--'•;•:--- ir.2.-..7.-11..z.:....•:..::-....-,-...r.-.:.
CRS CARPED WON KO SO
.... .ss .A. ee B STREIT Out.
ass .ss •.•1•R
Le UTILITY fASLIAR1
OC DiCal.“CASOALNI ......1 Ars s ... se... Amer •-• •R • •
•L MALODOR LK me...A sa RIR.. Am.. .A. s. ... Ra
, , , '‘. . ' i....mr:Aaris...1.--•.ir-•—-—
,/,' ,,,,,'",;!7?",,r1,,,-.--,,/-•:-1,-•,,'' '; ,s, ,' / ;•,,4..% ,4 i‘ _A, . - , ,. ,, __ _ , ,_ ..,,„...,,,..„.„„„..,......„....
........ .. ....... _ ... . .. ..
.. .
.. r-r ,„, w..71".•to,c''' i ' / ' ,• H' -.--,k ','''Ili,,‹.i •'''' '' s - '' 1 • -ii - .-..t.::7'.•;,-',...L.:-.7..7.........___
.... ........- - .. ... _ ..
__,_; ..-.7,"" -,,e- . .. ,, ..- •• - . : , ‘, ... . , ;,. . ',.,- __ ', -7.t:.•....r..-":7.7:.......____ ..... ........... ..... - .. .. .
:, ,.. ..: . -, '' .-,-.- _ ;;p,•• ,, i, •:, I. . •.:-. I, .h...7„...:77.„'1,...,2',......:..,••••••••----- ..... ........... _. - .. - -7....,..:•,,,,,,,•...”•-4. --- ........ .......... .......
... . . ...,
4,...,„...,:,,,,-....7.,••••••••_--....-..--,....-1 1(i: 1 :R ; , .4 $700,,, 1 t -..,-,I4 ',,, t ,...t.....,‘, 4 - t; 7:.4.7,V.f.Pe.... .....,..„...
s.•.1..0.1 0/0
0....
' StRit1040C ••••••c••••
CAR A.SLOE illS
RR..
— ••••••
---
...........................
,i/ '6,•I•1‘, ..i',,.4 i')/I ,-. 'C) .„:.. ,""4e,... .".7 „
' ,C,"\.;'•".,.: f ',',ViLf.:,•. .i.ss••,,,, ';•1 c- •;; ',.,) '(_)„;;. ; 1; , - " '- •' •; , ;'' ', - ' is --i. ', • ii''•; I,'j 1, '0;tia-r0 V..,.;,' : (7)' ,.s I tNIST.ZONW,.RISOOsTRL 1,(1.•10 OC:( ' t. ,• i! i ..'.',
,,,, :- ,srstese LA.DES.GRATe.IMO..Of.Tr AfSCirs,Al
.
'• N 1,' '* ' 1 \Ili\\''' ''' ',k4 ,....------- _ PRODUCT' , .• • . s.,oll“E.,••eums ALL RISOLATRA LOTS.COmee CALOR
- : , ii-‘,:1„S , i ;• . . .__ , j LA q,, y A.MO-0E-AATS.I
.C,,4 — -, t ca.A.SLIK 29•• _ W/ .
‘\-'- r i '' . Z. - 40 'I 'P,'' ' I , ... , ••• - ', ,:-' ' t •
IWO.RO 4$0.0C'•-•; ,, 44,‘.. 1 / fj',\\ ' • )1''''; ''.-'- '57 r - '- ' 13 Z.se No...:we.mon at,our..
..• .34151 ,.... La.us,...am,.(11..11,muST(11....
--- -_l'i:', ''•(-1- " 1 P ...."'"-- ---. -...
, e ----"L'i 1 i i ,‘:• , '. • --,---- •
Rr •• .., .--, 40110.41E0 304011LI OF DEVELOP4(411 4Z)
DO caeloucece t....,..._
FALL rill Susae(A 4•11(--.)
:,1_ .J-T-'.-, - ‘. '- '', ,t• --_-t..11:-.=;'. ,. "A"f/; d..;' r,'' -.. ,t'7,--'1-,\..'' ''-it',., J-
.!.
\X C-7..;---
..
• ..:.......\i K. „ ,' ' / ' .. ,.." . \' 7- - .(= ‘,!'" /1:-. :f..---- ___ 1 • :: , I REC1)JUN 1 0 1997
--, , ' ‘!-,/, _,', .. .'j --. _, -, .,..: , isst4r--- 0--------.__•-•'-::: • ; ') •:•::::- •-
, . , _ii., .,„ : . .,...1 ni. , : _, ,, ....,. . 44\T/-.:,_,...,_. sT:...,...,,.' •-. --.::•--'-: ''- ' •-"••.--' •,74, ''': -- .1W'''7.,04.---.... .-1,'i
• , ..., ; •\, ' •,- ' •_,,2,i,, -,,„',,-\ ‘.--1,711,-.1..: . ,,,-,\',-;.ri•---44.!`:.-...7,,i •-.. --• "_.,-,....,_:-...:\'•-• -1 r ,:;.-..:.:.::-.• i. '-:." ' '- '
•
2---.-.,- ipP.-- , --.F.::•,•,.: , • AM. :OS 71 1070]
I() ' ''•'-Fs- , - e•
' in*wavy
l•••
f1:::.,'I..•l
1•.jr,•
0
, . uLkA.fAistr=,a„,„at ll1i1iot,,"t,c
)0,.\•',..4> .'',',. :4,'-1•;-1,2 6.67n...'..'ss 4..:'1,....1.-:,,-'rg" . 021111..ri3..4‘.i...ii....\•..'•..•v...i:.z,".„a,.r.7..,.31......,I"t.°
7_A___.'_.,_4__6t:•Ac'_:.4:._..'t:.'U:-'.':.oi;.'‘.lV,.T''1*.,:'I..77 i",..:.0tZ,;S?L6.L
y,k-•,.r;.: '•....•:.".:•1.;.:“,.4 1......I,1..J!,,_,:N-_1.,..4..'1
,*-.4.,-.%--,;s"'l':I.,„:x ft...4....‘..,,..,,,-,,.^,0,4,.::"......:.2.:,‘.:•.:f:f:...r,-;,,,). 7 7•L„.I..N,,..'- i•1..::••,:(!.:f$*i,••
t,mO.l.-•R:y.T.,„1."1..,.'‘t..i",...etl.'.r,N.O.-_/.,,
I•,
I,
1T.OvA..1%3A.1IA1.S 11SmO..,AK,,1,4FoV,o R,.4aS1AdV1RUom..1.iIR.O..l!,L.N!,I11.4Y A,AiG4Fr..R t s,A1ADDITION
1 ;tp M , ,
/ 0: '
4sN
.O.1...•1001I
I1 I A/
A,
S
r''•0 IMC.O.HR,CAR SIR•IMIRUSS.,1•L
•
• City of Southlake,Texas
0 STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA 97-057 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Timarron Addition, Village J
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition - Village J, being legally
described as approximately 56.817 acres situated in the Hall Medlin
Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a
portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2,
Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. This plat
proposes eighty-four (84) residential lots and seven (7) common
greens.
LOCATION: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and
East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East
Continental Boulevard.
• OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P.
CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6)
RESPONSES: None
P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved (4-0-1) subject to Plat Review Summary
No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendment:
1) delete requirement # 7b (provide a minimum 150' cul-de-sac
length for Street 'B'), provided that the City of Southlake Fire 1
Department has no issues with the requirement.
1
STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Plat Review Summary
No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those
requirements addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No.
2 dated June 13, 1997.
• L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-057PP.WPD
, • ..
•, 041*,,,,,,-0 .- : '-f. g' g a , -
3°3D22,A 30 3AI '''•••••1, 30 k
.-.-..
• e•-iisi .....•'pi • . - ,
3o i
---L___ 03 ..___ _.. ,. '- I I, ; — 31' 37-1 131111113C 30 .atc:3-3---stmk, 4 F.. 8
___--7:2"-^---....-----.L7-__11 t -. --ill a I,4=;r:;IP Or;Li....L. .--..F. •••
......T '' 3C .._...._..............--- - ..,
i Y. SE 50 .• . 75Cm 3A 3AI 3C 4, 7-•
. diii 2 ittfif 30 ..3 ft
LI E ........": 1
„ , tl A 0-1 ,.,f.i...I 50,1 I • '... G 77,3 k 5:sr'?Ac
10 At 6 Ac ..•' -8,63 Ac 57 Ac
t -
:... -
. 't .. .}401)1- • C -. ? 301 '1
. ._ . ._. ._._
.. ; _
5:4 ,,....,.... Girl
30 302
- IV I•-- , I -'1 -' , v
'''.."'"-{,--.°".......„ i'
1 314. e.!6° ,,,, nil
15 k )
- ,,
. .-. . V 2
II i.._.i •-•- 1 .-• :- ., \ Y ZAIC -1, •-: 2A-5 • ,cif ..0,
a , ' ask ,....,
3
.,,.. k
. .• ._. 3441 p,0 P"? 4 23 .• ..... ...e f. 1)I 1 elci e- L-'
, If ...••--,
28 .-- .
.-c s
,. i i ... ,.i x /XI t'• Pi • f24k ... 450_, rat cc4.4••i•' al "..40.
4. f Q t,t if-7A4. • .
`r- A- -
/ ,
AG" liaL 1 .
ea --
• -- - IF 7 ••-
i... 31 !33' 28 283A IR 1,..
i 063EDIN dcg.1C, Hid' HT f
20 At ..,
WI 5 k / Ca ' 4Ac 5UuAr4.- .13.1-•'``• SUMCY A-ori
:...:• 1 41 48 Nikr"rr
.11 , I
:'....., ---.
1 5)71 A
4 5 AC 1 2C 2C 0 2C2A t. 2CW(•L..: ...1 i i s .. .. .......,....,
......, 4,
I.
131)1" )14 crp i, 1 .
.AcKs•elp •S- ;....-..-„.
..,_...
4 at 4 Az
i •
•`..r
. .
.
HIRAM GRA.W=.11- ft - ;,)-..;..1 .':....- ...„- ,A, r • ...,....f..40 ;,:
,,,,....ill •,, Ir—
.-,
WW1' AL:41 g --LI-- ' ........wr,I,T74-, i 814 ... ,...,,,.. .....}. ;...L.. .or i .,.........
... PP • \ i i 1 i....j g .., _.._. .1
LA ' ., . . . .". . ? 1 i • Ti'• ''. *4... r . - - i i I „.
. . i - •....
,, .•••,. • .,J— :1.7.0 ip ‘ ia
' ---1" -: -4,-fm4 -1 •0
- .4, • t.-141;:iti - i
- •izi • 1-----n
_ -10 ......1.._ IN • PARK
•••-1--
- '-
1._
Alc0 kI '
• X
i4-4-,
•.•' • . . .. ••••••'r. _.
:4 ! Xi I., 'ii"."4s.4 •--;.:. • i •
..r_._.,__„—"-14-7,
[
, . 4 „....... :.._41 _ ----...-.........
i , .... ........ , ! • . • ......
...„‘ J
,...,,r ....
17.0--440311
.I. . ,, ..
. •
„....,..,_,..,.......,„; A -
44ar7.-....7•Zr.p
Tel : 4A
LAI
.111MMINIII
6A
F-67.1—
. .
_ , ! , ..,,,,,,,,j. -- _•_._._._Gt..or: ;Z.% .-... :I•4.,. ::. . .....%._ 74'.... ; -s 1. Alill
'"°45.2iWgv, 44i,
• ..,...,. „glee- A. -- "qgfil 6F1 6C If
okii0P..i:ai
- A•N -a a r emme ..... ......._ ...tql !,-,;* . k , '•4 -- • g P- -- -.
i i -, ..,,..., , 1-A- . rpc.,‘...11.2te •., ,
;„ , , ... ADANT r,...,. „:„. , -, . ..-- -.„,,7 • ---- ,y E•
tA 18 }C •-- r15-.-- i , 'i I • itiO •I
AP • i F--..., is • • .- .7 ... ._ ,,i...4 , ''.(1.141i9v1 , i%kir A4 ,
1 , JI a',„kg- i •
.,
.._
.i.
IA1
Illj i I •
i I t I ,4810P ..,
.
- -..- ...
.....
.... - -
.
,I f '
' ' ' 1 ' ..\•:k. LI ''.. se - 2' 1-1 X -'-..---'.. illiabibs7'7-7- • • i 3 ` r 'A
",--7-10._ \ -.:-- --...,.. ... ! ! , . ! , ! ! i ! , " . , _ _„ . vkds,
. ....... ............ :c., ., •I masnaa.111•1r,‘ .10.0,....1 . I . 7. 11!. / V . ...1
6144-1•• i r .% -g4 . •-....... • iii - •• - iii • iV In - i VF• "6 p41;if '
, •i' \---, ' --( --t-. .--tA. -4.N .,- •-• .
-- • . • A-4' ' 4 - 1 2A3 '. .1.•
! ! 's ...,. IP t , . ss i ' , 7 •-• ...-r -. i f i A, - i . ° 1 t • • .i -
....""
;Tie.s• I •-• ."17 ‘,.' ', "
, .,. . .. -.J • .-, . '' -. ."f. ,.` • 41. ' • -‘.-. \ ,)--kr-. .,,, ,• 1 .-.. ., --.1,i-.-, f-•:-'1 -
-4. .. ,tel• • .,, ;•-., r- • - ...
,,..,.i-,,..._ -::.,---,._.11. -•,•- ..-- , , . -- %. . .,•,, .k.._•-•%•-•_ ,i • wl- .,.. /7 / .- ii,.014 i t '
.... .-., -0 :.z:: *: - -,x-‘:-..v,...----:.. ,_.. / :a. -.. i •
...4 -1::.,1-. :.=-), .,.71-- .-- - - ?., ....- ,
' -, .---k- '-> .4.-ez . ".. . ..71.' •:-.:.,,\. - t, .1-
,-,
4. .4-.-irc---- -lia: ' ' .-q .., ...,., ..... ....,.... . . . . ,, . . . I
1 i ‘ 4.., ;* "!
A....."
.-•,ort•nT.01_ . ,••?.,---.. f. ::: ,,, ! - .-- -1 • .
•-• P 1 i i i \ %.
HOE I- N _,.5 vvi,of :To- - •
..
•-,- ac).2E — iWCYs4; .. • - i-.,'t ; • ,t -.r.;,:5,0„ ..1,4.,/,..
,... . . . .
, •; ! ! il .•! i.,-,1 7)14.0.t. ''''";-:;: ' -• • . •••
"\., ,/ i N ....., _,..,_.• . , . ' \ -.' :. L L 5\1 E 0 L N , 0 .:'09: T .••• :_e• 2 .. , : •
i !. . .-1-4,'..i•-_,,. • lx,„; - -„, ! - - .,-
. 7—:--411ilil , . *:1W'•''..2''. Itif.Z, 1 •,. ' : .
,.
t -.71:1‘. . !ogse .,,,,1- • 4,::,_' ? .16:a I, ,i::-.:. ,- "..,
Nil :'-• .-!..'`,:::.1. --',. . .....'f:
d . •, vt` 01
. ,
, ' li 't i :::.),..:i ..?....7,::, --1'..:-:-- l,-----.. • •' :'
, .
';''.- '''- • .ex'-' ../.1‘.. 1*-<,,zfi:i. ‘... \6,5‘tirk,',, i --: . .
s .,/ 4,\Sff.,,.........;'i:, \.;--647!-:e..,‘, ,.. ..- .... / • r . „ __•-. -
1G lE -
•--r' ,i ....
/1 .. . .-.: „.... • .;.t. .2 \-..
,- - c •, ..• . •
,.,,.. _.....
•,,-• i•.', t-i. a • -G'p t., •,_- '-- ...I-7."' .''..- :
i . ---,t-:' 1,-pal•t1t5g--;;? --- ,--
, -3 ‘.
t.,-% , • ..• .-: .....11_.,g.•
..,
,r01. " 17.16 44
. • ../
3Ai•,... -- -
, -.- ..,.- - ..-ipp- .-:.... - 2118t3 Ac
"i;jo.--..X-7.....3. i . i • <?--, -..,. ,
,...
KA- .
. „ ..... •,... , ... ! e ... ,-
\ „ 1 , . .. c•
H11-1- . (..-- -
-,.• II A 1 i c•A R
.s,I"'>..3::T't(t.;01". /1 ! '''' 141'
' 1 I. A ° ...-.z...A.,.
.... •A
a ! .t jN. p CE30'- -00H_ Lbw/r 1. ...,-;-.
millimaiii 1- i‘1 i /j .
..."---• , PU'l\1 T A - ... •
ILly!i.: , EHPORT-
' 111 T7 • •-Nsz ; i ---••• cti-\
.... -t- I--\,---. _Itt.irr..-• • „,..--c. ! _. 1 Az I A2A SI.R3er -412
TRACT MAP
r7G- 2
City of Southiake
1111 Timarron Village "1"
t
, . V/1*
1 ' , 1 s
01.11.1111",* -. ' - '
. - \ ', ...
.: ji . , 0S,11111/10vO•
. ,
. ,
, , Silir, ** *** '- c
,, ,fr , ,, .. ,
„_ ow •••
, . ,
: ♦
, i „,
- !
, „ III Poi
" . .1-A (L
,...., 4 oisqr do
***/1 I 0*
J. , •
- °SI/1 1 I 111,
. . ,'v...,. 4 4 A-1 w's,,,sss4.1
\ ,:,,,,,, /
Io ,
*4, Ij , EE
\\ ti ,
*W. \n..."°°.'..43."." - ..
,..,. ri ,-j---:-' '
Ilk al. Di
IP 1%ii,,,. •%... r ,, ,
Legend
ØOCLMEI
ata has been cony kd for The
Various '+'
of Southiake. � Timarron 'Village ")"
ether this Informatlon.Erery efbrt -7 G 3
...n,.ae to�the accuracy
200' Buffer Area No Scale
ogiven f=aidr ad-to .rxx y
Parcels Within 200' Buffer Public Works - GIS
• Timarron Village J Adjacent Land Owners and Zoning
29-May-97
# PIDN Owner Name
01 42168C 24 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
02 42168C 24 4 NEWPORT CLASSIC HOME
03 42168C 24 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
04 A1037 2A01 20 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
05 42168C 24 15 TIMARRON LAND CORP.
06 42168C 24 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
07 42164C 37 6 LEEPER, ROBERT
08 42164C 37 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
09 42164C 37 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
10 42164C 37 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
11 42164C 37 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
12 42164C 37 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
13 42164C 38 12 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
• 14 42164C 38 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
15 42164C 38 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
16 42164C 38 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
17 42164C 38 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
18 42164C 38 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
19 42164C 38 6 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
20 42164C 38 7 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
21 42164C 38 11 D&D HOMES INC,
22 42164C 38 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
23 42164C 38 9 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
24 42164C 38 8 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
25 42164C 38 38 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
26 42164C 38 39 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
27 42164C 38 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
28 42164C 38 41 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
29 42164C 38 42 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
30 42164C 38 43 TIMARRON LAND CORP,
S
ALL ZONING IS PUD NO. 1
SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO -7 &-C.i
City of Southlake, Texas
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
41Wase No: ZA 97-057 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97
Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Addition, Village 'J' being 56.814 ac. situated in the Hall
Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Westerra Timarron. L.P. Carter& Burgess, Inc.
7605 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250
McKinney. Texas 75070 Dallas, TX 75247
Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145
Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447 Attn.: Todd Jansen
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. The following changes are needed in regard to notes on the face of the plat:
A. Add the following: "Lots 1-18 & 20-24, Block 61 and Lots 8-13, 15-20, & 22-51,
Block 62 are Product Type `A 'and Lots 1-6, Block 62 and Lots 26-38, Block 61 are
• Product Type `D'subject to the Timarron Village `J' Development Regulations. "
2. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description:
A. In the 14th call from the beginning, correct the block number for ". . . the corner in the
northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 11F of said Timarron Golf Course. . ." to ". . . Lot 1,
Block 1. . ."
B. Correct the discrepancy for the bearing between the boundary call and the legal description
for the first call from the beginning.
3. The following are needed with regard to adjacent properties:
A. Label Lot 1, Block 1 of Timarron Golf Course to the west/northwest of the site also.
B. Show and label the type & size of each adjacent easement on the Golf Course. Also, label
the type, size & deed record of the 15' U.E. and 15' A.E. filed by separate instruments
which cross the Golf Course and the site. Show and label any easements to be abandoned.
C. Correct the lotting for the southernmost portion of Block 38, Crescent Royal Addition,
specifically Lot 43. Increase the font size of the lot and block numbers for the sake of
• legibility and label Common Green 44. Show and label the type and size of all existing
easements on Crescent Royal which are adjacent to the site (D.E., U.E., and M.&A.E.).
7,-5
City of South lake,Texas
4. The lot lines between lots 27-28 and 43-44 do not meet the requirement that all lot lines be
0 perpendicular or radial.
5. The following changes are needed with regard to street geometry and rights-of-way:
A. City Engineer must approve minimum radii. Please confirm approval for the section
between lots 17-23, Block 62.
B. Compound curves are not allowed. Please confirm adequate tangents as required.
C. Provide a minimum 150' cul-de-sac length for Street `B'. (P&Z recommendation: delete
this item provided that Public Safety has no issues regarding this item.)
6. The following changes need to be made in the layout:
A. Provide lot widths for Product Type 'A' and Product Type `D' lots as required by Village
`J' Development Regulations.
For Type 'A': the applicant has not provided 90% of the lot widths at the front building
linez85' and four of the remaining lots (Lots 27, 28, 43 & 44, Block 62) are
below the minimum 50' width allowed only on 10% of the lots.
410 For Type `D': provide a minimum 50' lot width at the front bldg. line for Lot 28, Blk. 61.
B. Show approximate floodway limits, in addition to floodplain limits shown. Designate the
area inundated by the ultimate 100-year storm as a drainage easement if intended as such.
C. Label the type and size of the easement along the west lot line of Common Green Lot 7,
Block 62
* If the intention on Lot 38, Blk.. 62 is for frontage to be on Street"A", then the lot line adjacent to
Street "A" must be of a lesser width than the lot line adjacent to Eagle Bend.
* Provide load and access width for the bridge/30' common access easement between Lots 15 & 16,
Block 62 in compliance with Fire Department requirements. (Ord. 480, Sec. 4.2, "Frontage") For
questions, contact Vicki Hess, Fire Safety Inspector, at (817) 481-5581, ext. 737.
* The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage. park
dedication requirements, and off-site grade-to-drain permission and/or off-site drainage easements.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Carter and Burgess, Todd Jansen
0 Westerra-Timarron L.P., Steve Yetts
\W P-FILES\REV\97\97057PP2.WPD
76-u
•
•
•
_
TA/ANNON
1
L'Are.I• 1410 :441.'S•••:.:V113 4.741•:.."''''"'"-"" 41 i- 77- r-“" --';',"0', r'f':(t
I 1 .. .65 'fir.4ti'l". '4:41'=XVI.1'.`'..44""'""'""•"'"
' 1 -:Jo,..r.••"trifs,• riCA.NITAL • ? T '' tX.11•I'd:•=1:1 4.7•2.1:'''•'""""-'"" 1 r j t-_[--..-:_. , - : 4,v
A ,L704.4wilx,::::itri..t.::,%.1•,...... UV ruarv.:&I..---•---- N '-'ii h ' '-i;Nit-:
1' sw•so-n-w .00-1 ..;'!".i --' - - ,..:'; li!....• ---, LIVT.:...01'.r.r.P=.".•""'''"". I ''01: 0 .:,',: 4,"r744:17:14,417°.':ualk="17Litillz*"'".•- ..,.:.:.-.V.111.7.11..T...1.-'.•---- '7
$,,, ,)..n
' ,i •-t•••i- ; ; .
mu.-...7.x.::::-•----'-'''--"'"' :s.t.-:UM'V.".'"'=""'"-'''"""'
t.".1:".•-:.r.M0 f."4.3`."''"'"'''""" ta.a vz,.1.•a•rx.t...=L.-.•--- 'A,: ,; 4iii,.
, - , , ;,.. ....‘. ,F...,,,, ,.. ..._ ,". _z . . .-- :V.I.:L:11:V&Uhl.",•.•••"...". 1.747:11.1.74;17,7.-.M.6.`"''""-.--..
'az:,kaa7,4 9."',..1'.:P".''''''''''"^" '42421.1.1X,7?.L f.V...."."''•"""'""'"'" tex... /.trerJ -.. ', '-j''''f,'17-,,,
' i hN.' / ''',V r "-'0, ir '''' :\‘‘`,k, ' 4X017.14t7:6•1 SIgt.'"".•"'"'"""""" 1241'.1.:•`31?.i.:rl."..'"'"'"`"""`""" ,a.
•''. it''
c.":,'43" / -,- :r '' • '' • , t'.2.4 7'.:::::1....1.1.:::"'`'"'"""`""" Z.1.11:1.,14.1.7,'..:=.:"'''•"---"" I..,A 1.:.;11,;./..•
I f .L• 'II.' • V Lulls:atm r.V.1!"'"`'""""-"" •-•-••••••••••••••
.-kt:41`..:01k71 r....---.1.4""-•"----- 1.-%741.1,-.z:-...a.1 ,-.2.2 - ,44.4 Egisimiclis_ DB
...-,...,,,,....,------
.. , .
, • - .: '.. ' . • : - ' : . , ' ,' , rad r."28•.7.'17.1.••"•••'••••.".".
LI•4156:41:40 T.T.C.1.'.•..."••.."•`• •=11.211ICAIME11.1-116 ..O•-"IMM M=1.1111MMIEM
ICTI=EN:MINEREM=11:2:slirmINISI
l- '- igl-,,i '::1.,4.-.1 I. '.* '' i-, '..' s S.$V•f.:S.,1'4, %\ T.." I'' 's I(:,_:?,', -'-'.-'-'7 r:v•.... zzraywn..-?,:.94':15".440:14.it"".
=....- -a,--r:rz.
-
IN:1111=1111:11MIMIZINEIIIIIMEXIIZO
).1',' \ '''. ' ,`K- \,'- '''''''''' '1'.., 1•"?'''-,,ir 4•4- - • ,'O'-,,,--<:"-.,;- •
hi-r1.-i-c-Ics-i.:-.,,,-::::Tr.--trz.--1--:zr“...:16:3, VW CA/V10 0001 MOO 100.0
CAS CAPPLO AO.POO WI IMINUMICIIMAMINIIENF311.111MEMIN
-,• ' '1144.1 - 'I -4S• SO .,• .•• c:'-` ,AItioqiElgilralatf0DITIAL !,- - . • .......................„...... . SMUT CTN.
LC Ultir•(ASWAN, 1111111:11110EIMMINMEINILIVE
/ '' ii..-,••-.1, 4.4'r. '''k ' ,/.. c,p,‘', . :'1:ft t'T 1.:' ,, , ' - -,,,-=, .T.•41."'"•'"'"'"'`"" Of 01104.EAU.,
111. NATO.LK
M
• • Z.:....ir:.1:111..:,-4;:--'---.-- m
' innE=:1112Smi INIME.91,15111
I t ,. ; •`-,: '• A ',..„_,c -,- •, ‘, 'D.,.1.\"'cl ,.., __-,--...._i,, ,,,,r...2,,,,,z,:;,:r. :,.-: _-..::
1
=M111111:MIMM .11 -11111111111 •M a=1=1:111•311=1:•1111=11111:111111EME.11
,....,,, ca.T....sitt,c,ilsa_64,,..-,,,,,•-,,i 6....... : e., , , • * ,,,,• _ : S, ..,,-...,, , ,--- _ , .4, rzh,. 11-,r+•;214:-. MME1311211
.„.„..,Te„,..•••••••'.•..............
.0,,,,,,,iiii60, .2 , n • X , -• • ,-° • • A, , „..,,,___
G.)1 - ti''it-: -/ : , -'' ‘st, .'. •-7'-- ,,. ,..,, '',,; '.,,'.. t".,.. •r",,a2,1„.....-- 1111:1====11:1=111
11111=1=11=1=11=1Mal •.M. INEIVIEMZE
M:=1:111=C111:111=1110111711116111MMIMIIIINC/EZE
=3==l1111•11MIN11111:1111=INECIIMIIIIESENZE
-,
; .I • '' t 'C','„ 4 d .' ; .,,, , ' . Si- -.0.'" ..; '' ' •' , e • ,y...;:az•v&-aue••••---
1' i'' ' I.- '1 0 ail --, , -,-,__. ,' '•.•.,.. '0, • •• ' '' t.T.irr----."-------- imilimaza::ismossomiwill
. _II. _;*-- .L .,. s,'si__, ,t, : .,, - ,::,. \,,,',.-, ,,-„,,, ,, , -,,-,,--i.,,/ ;,,.7----
MANNON =11=1:31111MINIIIIIIIIIMMIEM231•111•11111111=1•1111
1:2111=INIECC:111=::1111:1181=11.1Mirmain
''''....1, . , ,,, ,n. ,,,, r,(,.‘..1 ' ,:•; -, - ' '
' I ',,• ' t .4 .1 `. • - ' : / , 'I -, t .' ,', ,1 0, , c•1711111t?ITN
1411(1
/0•00,.10 40.0C MC=:111111=111=1E=i11111111211111=MMOMM211112111ZIE
Ll0,100101/DINNIV NES/KW.
IIIMIIMIIIIIIIMCIIIIIMMINIM:M=111111=1111112:11
' *'; ' , • AVOMAN' , r • - „ .- . / t ' •,)''.'p : ;, i-) _.. 1,•--),;,' ::„ IIAJ' ; :,'"''''.- •T .-• ': , .--7---
.
' ,' 1 ' 2. '' ''/' '-' NOVEL
- -•..•I 4, ' ..
. • I IT-'..1....' - :-II, - 11 ‘I ,0.•'-' I'.. •••., • ,, . ,• ,C.1 I, ::: p...:_,„„ _ I-r- I,, . . •'' P IllPvIti01 f.trx1.11•".«,.•;:ott•«A.,.....: •:!.' -.-, r, ,• .' 4, ' ., _ shiG _ T. t, "-:'',, • '‘ ),__----- ,""km'' ...' -
. • • ',.. ' • .'•-, 4, t , 1
-:., , ,, 3-val..?.../0ALLOAS ALL RESIOANTIAL LOTS.CONI.MAK
! \ '' 1‘ \ ; ' '''';41: i' --'. - ''' - ' i'',,-1 ----- ' '' ,eirl-,,,,,,,,r ' ', r' ,.,,7-A z i• ...,C.N.i."°,77.,N7''...).6,ALS SNALL WI hi LOCA„I?MI.•.. '‘ II, '' I. ,.., ' 41°. , • f. I..•L,'''••k•II, . /' , .,-r%kit",,,,"1" ''.."”
::. - . ' ! - n '. .G.1," ' '• , .6sars . - S AL C CINLIT AREAS AK 10 IN CO..OWNS 0.0
,..4-, '-' 2? I
"..'
r49.U.51 __•_• _ .-" ...ALL SAW.SIRTIL 1.1 ANA TO IN INNOVLO
00
NNv.' \', • 1.0 ' ...7 ..k.' .• PC-- . ''P'...; r .. ,.. ‘•,01, ' _. ' - ' •••• 1 1" - i , - - V)
\,,;)1k I, . , `,.-4(-1) ''''.4;,- ,,.r -41,,. *--.., , : C)., _ i_(' , „ : , i R JUN ECD 1 0 199P‘c,
' .,'" . ' ''.' , ;1 . :,",4,. '-'•-••-0 .Z.\ \ i 4,
' %4 "1 : i ) ' r,,,:'•4-.'!:,• -"----'-'-,-.-:-_,--.:-, ' ' ,_ - ' '
ITO VONS.101.1.• I I ---•I.• •. • •' ..;• • 1. II..-'AI,....".A.....r4'...• ..t.. • , .frIP'- , .-' -•-,, , ,,-, ,,,- q :: :''••:-•-'-',.- ',..... /ALL MI
' \I; -0- '‘,,Z.•.. 00,-.0t ,''..,...
•••• .:1 'r• ••• . .' c 1'i 10 -At ' ' .'‘ '• ft.' . - .--, •
0 ---, . '. )\ ...,,,,,,-,•......, ,,,i...._ 'a
-- ,
• 4,7-14 - ..ersc.i17377 •,•* ....".0. ,,,,,,„, ,... ,„
e 6, * r.• • ;,.....A.p.r,g NM
...4.,
.'9°' -. e.. ''t"' ' 'swi-•3y.ir.-7:••• ` \' ." -t 1, •I1 (.4 i 'I.'10.IIIPOL4=1?°1:40.11 PIIII•11111ART PA AT
' NA'I' ; 0 , • . 4 TIMARRON ADDITION
, II.,• T.
.,
VILLAGE I
''-,* ..,..; „,-.1.:-.. "wt.'', ' „„.„., . „:-,.%i„:01-;;,•,-„,- c, ,. ,. . . ,.- .'s,,.i/.05• OW Of IIII
.1 AN IN IN SIAN?I.ANS INA/I NO 1011
....
L 01 L SLOCA 1 INIICT 10/c-,2,1,3•01 ',VV.,
,•,,•7.,r.r.•)',.! ,_ . .••I 1__ ,,I's _ • ts 'HA.' •I. ,,
"VII-
(--) 4#j so'•`" 41 ' 4.,..1.-1K27-1•ctigr.
51,1101 AtTiFS/OA LOTS
......I, ' ) 0116•464 11/1•71150.• 10.110,P45100 .1;4(00-1-. •••1,... ,,, ,.. A L ,4 4,i i" - -, .- 1 COMMON GREENS
,
21.33'
‘‘ .'."‘ s• ••10....• .'*;if '' ../.1.1 IN VII ANION*I SI,oNIA IN/010w.N
1101•VIII,..•PAIN.•AT
•
' )4/. . ... . ,,_I''0.- ‘‘.‘.,,,.., '''i A ''''' •:.... .‘ : Wm.(V,II‘AN 1.10/0
1911.111 S.11 I AN PI/:1 S/N NS?.•.1'.
• ir'<••4 ,
1NI.III.i.1.1114 A 1.•I s,.
•I'11,1 I
'' I
,.. 1
City of Southlake,Texas
STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA 97-063 PROJECT: Plat Revision -Timarron Addition, Bryson Square,
Phase One
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22 (Common
Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One, being
a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson
Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 2.880 acres situated in
the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899.
LOCATION: South side of Saxon Trail at the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon
Trail
OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P.
•URRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13)
RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area:
• Steven Lallier, 720 Ashleigh Lane, Southlake, in favor of.
Letter indicates residents decisions regarding the common
area bordering the creek. See attached letter.
P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997;Approved(4-0-1)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated
May 30, 1997.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 1997.
L:WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-063PR.WPD
�14- )
•
•
AA A1.®.�8• 8 • • ..•®�® .. 1
92 \.; i • �t:•• izD 00- 'c C 'F•IF! Q p •5f t':
IA. I f' l,.` •
e.�C , • rJ' A +Q �• t,,° V. 6i.Mi :itcij$ t� - °tl �.'1".4". • -* ` _. • l: 12 14,11,61 ,. 'I o'o e
im .
94 8818 as i
3A s 3A2 • J
t0 •.• ! 1 I - gipP,14,., i .24.�1 Ac
I.
��-,..my, !•• jam'. . .. ,,,,.:::. , •.i ., ...... •. .4.; 1 y e I.
,k.,A,
•
di i
• - lEi- •: -� ' •°. .1 -.�. . Alt . 9• _. RICK-,I D E�°
t017;om./JISY7r. T 4�: s•..,!� •1 it' !,...�. Y ' �' f.
•
•
, . i•-•-1 T1-3. • . :..•/.... j•�i-•rl'� ' .: ' i'''.1.
' ' i •••I. - } 1 ' • ., ' 9..
—_ ter-• i •--i•--t-C. ''
; ; N J j CR i iJ 1 i r ! )-
j i i ! • 1 1 1 • i i i 1 1 ! i v !
--'..-• --•+•-• 4. ; i •i i ; i . �-, I ;i - �l - ze
b i 11 _ _ CITY
�IU: i /\
• -+- ,- i i i i 1 _ E-._ —_._._ �8 r E,.I:.: HALL 3A
_. ._ 7 . 1 i _y 1 ; ( E _.___ •-_AE. .._-fir ----' . 7 J.•_. -
n �j ' i i -, i 1 ii i 1 yd' •\ ! i ! _ _ f _ -i---1--r--N'-,
i 1i i i , \i i i , i i i
PARK i i ! i ! ! ! ! ! + i i i i. .. ! !
T_-_•-4_ j i ! I..--_. 25 Ac i 1 . 1 . , �i
i ` j - —1--i--.1 22 Ac . .�D3A 303 3C
'T. •
i `�_ 7.665•Ac 3.1 Ar • - _.
11.11....
' _
m
V '
-}-}� _ i
!!' •r_d5--i••,� - 4E...8..... 1 �i 1 1 `�t �� 502A 303A1 �� 3C,4 �I 3D��'I(vu -CS)
rrrrr'''�. - _ _ ._
.: 'III 4;144-6.3,u_N,an r-M .__
— 3c - .. 50 5 SE w 501 502 I \ \M
C 3A 3A1 3C 36 4C 40 -A
�
• 381 r°�
.:�' S5pp,, sai Ac 3.56 Ac
x 111 , .P�i 10 Ac 6 Ac 5°11'143 Ac 4.57 Ac Dl C 2k 5 At �' '•' 30.6 Ac
Ailii OOP' P lA 1s A
3NiriaH:'
.. 30 302 ! + , >--�-rFIt5 \ i A `\ \ i i , i 1 ,
7K ` g _A:C 2AI2A1 2A2 2A5 �.• •
2A3 2 _ .
' 423 Ac _, 2A,B 2o,tt--'• .%- :X.>'l oI
Q
30 S.. 1p .' P y�UR 2.- 21 Ac1... A-, �_ •-y • `i•
VINE COURT EA T G J 1:'. b1 \.
I . ` X ICli ,
Q- J/ .©. g y � - :J i '� i _.
1
4.5 AC .._.,or.._.,
r f'-' .1_. .� i i i-• ��
I-, .tCvs ..1� a ! , •
__ t � iii
r'p� A Ac 4 Ac
♦ YA •� ! i ! ! ! ! l -
rin. ri,,J. _ 11 '. .1.:: _r
10 Ac I -+.*. i9 -.-._ .,.1 ' 'L r.` a_:
} IMg. .. . / \ 8AI
• 50 5Cl ; I ! _ R _
4 Ac
PAR. ` i tv.- cr. !r..L/7"...it....ti-
NI •N H
••ki-..4-•-i- i • I
1 4;C1 AC
'A F ,,.. -; TRACT MAP cl
_ ,.1,� Ilr 2 , A,
-1 S;n . 2C •
I
?? I it -. 2'1 i 1 -
/ l
IIzB I R3 I ( 3 ADJACENT OWNERS
0 @ .111 I :I1 a AND ZONING
TR 302
1 I c z_ L _ 711 SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO 4.2 AC
TR 3D
4.2 AC
1R "ZA3R
9 .11E
�R2E�,
PUD NO. 1
97 1.0 . ,
i Biel 2
61 •
TR 2 . \
0\% ' I
. 41) .:,„.. 0. vi. \
-1.
N. KN1 Y
. . 0► SCR 09"
• . Ai
( 1) ..\[\
TIMARRON LAND CORP. \
•
.. \ �./ \
J
•• /
4
U0. /
70 �� �. TR 3
4z -Q� 40 AC
—, 6 co
8 , O�� , .�0� \ 2 35 2C tW J �I `l.�) I
t f
r7/ $
65 • w Y -JI•
6w!* ; izT: , •
13 ." �2 \
O E aiL•FIGH LN < \
t 6 rt �O�qF s 12 o o » �m
1r , C,O a o �'`nz 1a ail.
_w.5 ,,,, U 7 5 13
J4 5:� 56 TtMARRIr5
_ cc 11) H3 .
z
•
i =
(21
•
ID Z
at 1
LOCATION w ; I• /,r\. _ i.N.N illAI . d� I• j PIA�aaR��• f'i ' » ~ }
•
„ w r»ar t S a 0)
r. ,� •.Li• TA. . - ---.y� t-i'`° ` a Mi.K` p \ Z I I 1•.IrI
noon 1•tc DATA noo•law[DATA ",••„ \\ •, i J
•
_-, ___ •
.17 / :I !
.•1 -1rarer• •«- • •v.v,f• n•, •rnM„............,' ..._. i • ir. �`
We 2
w w. v 1(/—
... •..na• r ..w .rw.•. w. ••••o r , _ \__— i'•1�
r
•.. •w»Y. r. Ma .NwY• nr Yry
0211
1
.•» •w,rvr. w. m a 0221.3.. n» urwvl. 1•'N'as l :)// I• d•1•• .u. •.r1,• r.. Farr _ ••`kP[ 1...
1000 C •l • 10. . N•' '¢IU yA ♦ '-A .• k tg. s.iic.r. \ i
N.I I I—,, LW is I 11:Ir.'
.100
• aa[. „ \ _. ---- , !" n »r•�...•..a.:Y i ,...•.car.
• I •..•;* I _ __ . FO •
OL: {� •w.'"i'• as a von w•i.c..c[ ur•
1'nT I.
• a.k��'8 1.�, I 1
•at'• ' }; Lu:b 3'.,^ , eras a 1 1 .
,♦ 1 '; :
33 141. "Wirdrz
•••.._ \ �—W ao�a -- . 44,, 1.,.•^'\ r n` _•.• .- '\•!•/7 u•
RR ar.• a 1 a awrai 1� s� `s\ -
1.
OCTAL'i .«6�'.,l _•
r 1 -r , a/. ''•o 1�••,a.I
•
•
rL000nAw a ri000lAr OCT. L
..ern••.,1 ,:!y` a ar t s u•.;�-k+i— s,.�r, tmmrj..è
; i `•1,.,, •e 4.40i k-�....V. "t-,'•,"i yrk....
...,,,,a-,.,;...,
I `1\
r.l e r a "• R— k r $' a ... s 1
GS[K•I 1M[aN�A �P»+•,rt•LOT TAW I ..—•p• --- i _•-n .. •' a1�ra.ar• 1y•.1 1w I••p•I P08. IE 2. '•• „•!;:. J�+'!}y. ..;` ♦ .'' Ir 00.aw I
a▪t •wnY . » . » ana•
n . •01
p• •.w•r• ,n» w n » ••.r ,..e 9•�__� I ;• . _ .� !` .•�}•- a , • -'•� Ei •O•f Yaa'♦••[
.A
AS 1 w •- aa.lk i AA IV `9`t..- `a 1 a Z.
.I r w.•` �•r;r
• L' y 1`""W w• ..1:.„ " ` 1 ->- :-k+_•-_.. ..r.'`'N=•' i-r R.N .:Act iris '
an • CLAM OAIA Ir R.O.V. r..„Ja +i-04•J ••1•••, .re FINAL PLAT
1.
.•raw.•
_ o w.N.1 aep..• . / .sran . Rua" "!.."- ...'1" =l1�` ••Nv a TIMARRON ADDITION
el worst •w» •. •. - ' _ .•x , a ''• m:r'•6N .-p� --� I BRYSON SQUARE
.• �x n.• new ewv w.�1E;tar / . \wrr•u u,•'2 _ az « \ •i R»
wY1 • .«.r w • . . • •• t'::i. ik [' u w a+ :1: i PHASE ONE
•' » » 00. tar .. n Far
•
p1• aua'w• .1. . Amy, nen »n nn er•ft 1•A•DATA » w„•�' `� ___ _______.___ -- E oral T.INC
OSIN
an•r '\^ \ or.•r•o.r SwM Ars Acr•o.R•R
ft• A. .WSW• 'er'01 3.101. ale •. »., t • •••ww•• says. •p.n—m a••»-••••r.p.v 11••s 1 '"E
... •en••• an r ' 1 • As • • ® a ....worms Mtiw o l� t:•:` OR K SO,OlA,1f,rA♦WA.I COUNTY_Raga
,r ASA • rune, • 21.17a ACRES
.. ..,.Y • worst. •�•"'•.•••••.mf Sr.•"m•"' T•.A 44 RESIDENTIAL LOTS/ COYYON GREENS
O.ta/OEKEOPEa:NCSITNNA
1LA_ nor./ ann./• a Ng. NAG*.•
f01 rR0• 1I•(aAr
a.a.Y a . .a+.s
• ,•SA—V.TEXAS 75070
WOIon» ♦ MIS ., « • " _ d Aral oaf-asw
04.
MN CMS UP1111• .o.w•'w.ter .nr ... • .w.ww. [..r.w..o•.. wrtayaKrpEcc
�f�Gr•Burgess•�'•.ai0 1 .ev .•• Assts.. N..+o a•'�.e: �`ore'•� •
.▪ a.a(fw,0.00 WOW., Or w1rK .r•f• • 4`gym.1�—=T�•r.p•gr......mo.p
_ "MNOW., , • 11. error a MN 1 • c+,o••t•.taa a=
V u••••.•,•11 M•R,soar r era M••[wow..•.1n• ••."V• w••1—�1••••
e 14.1 I 41.A—IT WOK., Col 6/141, e•nr• 1,314 g.1
9134
Meitr' ewer own.au..woon , . reran•• •• .•••..c•••»r r••r». MARCH 1997
l Kr a F nun.tA,»apf ITS .•••r ON IN noswllS• ,.•. •n •a.n,• aro ..n♦.•as w r^'o•^. U.S Pt.•1 OLEO..G•.tT_A__.S a_irysf- kii a•<(1 I Or i
CASE NO: ZA96-III FILE NO. 01-283I 4h1197 .\wnn.nw m,1 1\2.•sn r,«•n I.
1
Previously Approved Final Plat
�] "^. ..�.. '1 1,;,,•,?..:9"'...'.r ,..Nor..... o
ei ®ro a rn a o...erg.aarw2rM.,.�i..•a.T::Pori...N ro_bwIt
. iwra7 Y,iM .•N re•...g. • CI. =wM7 .1• /�v e ..Nor.... ZE''W.L7 ..Nee. )hr::.:V7.ter.7 ..Nyerr--- 4a
2` •• ...7�v i��a r�.r.r ��w i�rr .1•.a r... i M ggr eq rL.
r.r. ........rrw F.Z.
.....1...V....
u. m wM"N a...go ✓" � .•N asun. �".�
__ -- r _r twn
.a
0.
. .i�� tei.. w ..�..No N
W
L _..�.,.. .,Y„�
. e .r jr%u .•
yYor....e •
z
SOUTIILARL YLD IF II MO.17001 a!l V a: 4 . N.re...
YARAtlA YIDTY R.O.Y.) • r • .r.iYlas o.:=.1.. .w••u. l....... . r ,(.
2�.•.ryyv � N—e w.
J� I Y....t..Y M..n.Ar.n.
F .
II,
.� I - r�i �t Rr .. N.n r nws •®wry�. Y.�a Ye n4.
.at ..2. `�� ; I f.•rY
ru Nrr�14"m t.M.a�ywr.•=r r iRr .Y..i.clan
t.
sac
........ il` ` . a....wu I
I - .nra �..m• Mu+ia..wo a raL1..0 ,YM,�`r.�.
- ry`i ..YN r
"' e•.l.[... ..1. I iw�44 �� .is ▪.n..�o
..v. ..N.nru.o ........o.........r.r�.•Y 40.•. N ".
OPAL PUP
...AY f tau..A01.1101 I o i�•i.v� N �" M� .fit
I ergo riot ......12 r=?N.
'aa�Mill
Ca AGE Nf. 3 I .� ..N rrrao ® e.
iiim•Ar'
jJ r. I :11:7:.:....
� new ago ar.oeoo �i.s .o eo n.o....r
C..00• •R N r e o.gs w �•�e-
ON
of
~.r.rze I .I w ..\....r ego LEI"'
*F..�.I
v, 11111.1.
I �td�
LC•
W I.'••••• I t..m..�na rw.f▪Nr.Yrn�o
eaR M
wR .en I . -um 7�=a.. �▪ su..r..atrear.ra...a.....aoa_o. wi.�waio.f1 • H....._v .n..o r �Afr.1.2.
N I ♦ ..�..nari..a. -▪ �01a���m ~ `
I )ram a .i •M b+go
r o..molls• I `=..L.t c.=w FINAL PLAT
I Or
1 ..,E••oting Ara .a. 8 71c nI
1 " "_ ..N r rr TIMARRON ADDITIONAY I.. . _ n::.:•ear"' BRYSON SQUARE
�p� D..1:7 2N )c+.v:iv7`,.7. '•N—r°^- PHASE ONE
27. •r.... wTaM
• �..** D.Y....oll S.N.AOSIRACT.O.YYe
M
..: •'�raQ�•.c
an Or Sq.1NAR(,T.RRAYT COMM RYAS
Y.ch,..m I`: . v. N...r.... 2I.174 ACRES
) .:Wilt=^. ..N•..r o..o to RESIDENTIAL LOTS/4 COMMON GREENS
4171 CSIIPPIA MAROON.LP.
.... .p Y r ..N.r a eves N.CR/0(\RORR.•
MOOP.N.P.M.,.mrf n o>.Yl
.•N.w r eggs Ytlr K.1172)n.A211-5)!O)O
5.1
wir .i: •N""r.w. ENYrECR/S.MYEYOR:AMAMIImi W9rR--'iA_
Tw:i:'iv710.4". .•N ara•go b.lY.,a�C 4.11NI 'a .n.••
)r��ri .i.vow WV+ N e.o
e.... • ..• .g TNT RAT RED N CAY.(l_R_-SLOINIf.L Orkik UARCN 1997 SHEET 2OT 2
CASE NO: ZA96-111 FILE NO: 01-2631 .HI7I5, I.r ..1au.n.
--- .\vM.uTsn22 t..i\w.l\2.onD,E
PP rOVeCi ��►'l a �i Q+ T-
?reu iDu `
S 1
•
City of Southlake,Texas
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
"lase No: ZA 97-063 Review No: One Date of Review:5/30/97
Project Name: Plat Revision - Lots 14R thru 21R, Block 55 and Common Green 58, Timarron Addition
Bryson Square Phase 1 being 2.880 acres located in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
APPLICANT: SURVEYOR:
Westerra-Timarron L.P. Carter & Burgess, Inc.
7905 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250
McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, Texas 75247
Phone : (972) 529-5988 Phone : (214) 638-0145
Fax : (972) 529-5540 Attn.: Steve Yetts Fax : (214) 638-0447 Attn.: Todd Jansen
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. Place the City case number "ZA97-063" in the lower right hand corner of the plat.
2. Change the title block as follows:
• Plat Revision
LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55
AND COMMON GREEN 58 AS LOT 22, BLOCK 55
TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE PHASE ONE
An Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
Out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
Being a revision of Lots 14 Thru 21, Block 55
of Timarron Addition Bryson Square Phase One
as recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 3444 & 3445
3. Change the title in the owner's dedication to read "...Common Green 58 as Lot 22, Block 55..."
4. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200':
A. Show and label Common Green 58 of the adjacent approved preliminary plat of Timarron
Addition Phase V.
B. Label the block number for Brenwyck Phase II.
C. Move the deed record for the Rucker Family to the east of the Timarron Phase V plat
boundary. Label the "Approved Preliminary Plat for The Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto."
5. Show the northward extent of the ultimate 100-year storm limits on the graphic and in Detail 'A'
and label as D.E. if so intended.
1 /^
City of Southlake,Texas
6. Provide utility easement(s) for water, sewer and electric for Lots 14R& 15R and any other lots
that may need easements for utilities now within Lot 22.
Change the number of the proposed common green. One common area cannot be platted on two
different final plats. This will affect the title block, the note above the title block, the owner's
dedication and the lot designation on the graphic.
8. Show net acreage for Lot 22, Block 55.
9. Label the 20' building setback line within the plat revision boundary.
10. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to
filing this plat in the County records.
* The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be
received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/09/97. If not received by that time, no review will be
prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9"
and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
* Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original
signatures.
• Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also
required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original
signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than
signatures or seals, appear on the plat.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Carter & Burgess, Inc.
Westerra Timarron, L.P.
L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97063 PR l.W PD
•
/ YY- 7
Z
O '
0
--:
. nDo. .a - 0
8 l' a
Cr D
300 to.
0016
... `▪ ........ �
OH I. -,, a Moofao'. �:"<.' a"'�"oa:0£w�a: 0Nw� n.>rw Al.D...c�,..o....w —�o.,o Q O
.... -Ix v.. w •�
.1., mi '
i kF ` µ u"". •m'If'"»'w'^ .91E
1160 ..>
__ n. .w...o .. o
1-
I-O
a* ! 'S4dkf0W_F [�r. +. .
L, '''' S:•�.0"66 Irn
vow
...... ..... .� D m.. ..•.....
In IS 0 r G a / a } •"'.I'6v'a,,, 10.. p•«.u. D rawo.awlo:.".`�..oa w! w.< JN
61 60 .a .• m r..e.N.N...... «. o.,,,�® NE
LAiI . c •` ) rap s a.cc
DUAL•A• a., i �a[" CN'.Sti a.m
IL000FIJN a FLOOOWAY MAIL .v: .rowat .r,• v w.o p.p.v 0•6 r 1101 IN Q
/ ..,1� .. .D........•.a..r O. _ _
OWN1 P411 .• /aH)IOI �, o�K w.olo.�[l.�u[v vO�Iwi'u4 aNw w.,y.',muai Z
. 1131..Nw A0010.PMaN a ;\ I ' 1.0 W• ww....M.r'.r<in� Ill'tt'1� W
,-1 Irot 116 1Iw0DR v. 00 M w ~ ,Y
,;°:. / HAl,.). • 1 1 .or�ia1.c.�.`il ra �rw.u�..`.'.� u'.N.'.uw"w.u.uV.u:.n w..,s
D.•.r.D.1. t L 1
my • •pe
`�.3 [-`a'`0• •, a / ' / a a \ hui«na'ml'"R.n re iA s1 T▪1a ii:Wriai l.j="Pe a•ixi '•" ••w7 mo rt
-,�. ,c '.,, - �E- .aTN•L'E \ ,000:=ate to.'0q m n..T 16 o 60610•11 •444,A4•ionuw.o• ....,10. ....,m u.
10
"„ -9 e �a'w to. L a . a ...^ID. .N;n,•Lo0 00110..�o 00 .r:$..:. r V` .tt[0`°rdU tit$..°.,`bo`g"..�°9"13...•or,.
' .i a ' ,. ) : 1 m...N'•iwo110�'m r1a+1 i�,u .nr«..co'o... ...,'b.n..0 3000,
uNA.•Dn.Done« `'� l i y 1 '.1 `','..yea.. �ai....a n°""`.o.or
.MAX OM[ �•' U`.�. a'i�D �.f �0.. i •. �� I f.w dr D.e�'o.gash''..w.s6n0 CAM
CA•.A sla a.a. : . 'Y.4, .a.., .L Ai.P .±LI.,� r 'f-'�'�.,�'t`,'S. _ REVIEW AND COMMENT
IA.TL1. A.m '.Y r;.. ' ioa 2•- 2a11. .F r •
a r dN:ad..a"'.c
yy.,-1x "N 8a �"m r . •e'' P'.N R: 'r_y'R 4// I ogno•a g.°."li.a.w scow., • awl wi 013 ...,w. s....ww.
J h .s tin -'� 4'•.�N �.- .-�,a 7�`' 1 , I 0.1 a ,r .N 2,.d•nolw ri AO a a'mir..:t rt.
w.
Laa
Y - • .y —ram+1.��.r ( 1L.a1.Tl ''�uaa w'r..V w •t m+m.io no'[wuw
Va9 •lie In, ''r {• Ma.SM Al.[ v D'.rG.. w v
ao..0'.T ' , a'• �,. 1 17 I wESTELIAIT,.ARSO«•L..
L•„y .a N. - 1N 9 aN {mL•1', ,A/.tlL 12412.PAU 1.31 cwr H.rG...>1[w LoNcu(YAM
Lbw1M'W.' a yY _ -j • fa • JI
/ SWIM'Y t \•-' ,>< a-. ti-_���.g1•. _ i I a 00��L
r Al lY)Y�1,r w -' =�Li�?'_.._'.Y.n`m._{ `%T1i p • u.®' M_
1 \Y�NN'iYJ '.•l nwI
r1A...s k [—�q�1gIIIi I • r. N Or lait Pta Ma.O u.sa..l w.'.uv w
l,NMO«AOpI101. 1.0 1.114.N (I^ ., I^ I N I N is -� i \ al DOa Y.[rm.aM W u WS I.M.ri Y2s.0 i oaY
CA..A.Sill.).Sa Lb11.Y } .,.. aas - ma Was L
P.•.T.cT. CLw Mr LW Y F-_ �-••�•
r t r.»
ASHLEIGH LANE(SO'R.0.Y•) \,1
.,•
ant
PLAT REVISION
I011IDARY 11NE DATA "� Of
UK .n«ofa a..w...' q`I'Q(,3 LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55
aa'a EASEMENT LINE DATA ROOD LSM DATA-- ROOD WC D.T. AND COIiAYON GREEN 58
r.. MRNOARY CLINK TAME nr — •'+� • ' - w -r ........
� REC'D MAY L 1997 TIMARRON ADDITION
Fo7-sw al [.00• maw us 10001, 0u�;n „„[ 1010 •.00.. NW •WNW• We
BRYSON SQUARE
..r,. PHASE ONE
• On aMIAf• •1 AL330'oa•T�'N'o00 •w��n num
Q.Of nit
1010. . . .1 wr0p..; ,1�'r•«sl0a..Or:=4'..10 1..o..R.......r OK.N O.W..NIa11 SURVEY.ABSIRAC1 HO.599
IRN .aura[ „, „[ on. w mwo..wy,0 . ME
, Oa.al l . wg Opal aaro ii..v 0 .4l'.-.w.'. CITY OE SOI.TNUME T.xpANi COUNTY.ma's
_ .+.rr a or mar a
AIM VI cv1..c«Mai __--.a•a.,�- ,.. oNv. .. — Uwe w .'..,roe a.... ow.. 8 RESIDENTIAL LOTS/I COMMON GREEN
.ate« rra.Imp a a�.if i ' varar. •<•...d n.r. .. 2.880 ACRES
c •Do • r °r•
COS .1.13 001 ill an «Inn,a 1 •vva. . W. ""° W� p.Hex/pc•,ElOCER WESTER.IWMRON,lP.
as auuw u'. •lmrar. . M ,aolz.. ..10 'u....m'O1m:.mc�D:o'.".. �'°�0�1°i° )SOS NPCM4 PARNNAY
OfCommixI s ssrr[ R1a •Mr.• a. al AL m r.Da.w A.a.m 101.r'e'..r A.DrevN N.,✓r..miry 6.013013 YCERNEY.TEXAS 150)0
Oa.l ONG.AN AM MI.MOM1. .J..h..w.a.AT.N Ma.a IOre. (91x1 3x9-59a8
W II.1wMA+.I.e.1 RUM Ur..w •NI w It NlR1...LW Nw,.I L.)�'r '*a�`SAT N naa.s.o.a.w. ENGINFEA/41RVEYOR. /.�
AAA' YAAI.II WON a..A,u.[4 l.., '• War.. I v.YO...op..fW. CarteraBurgeas
t.1
•
e.
• av,ar....a,L...L... 1. Ara.vf a an
CAM".WPM.. N.R
�
THIS PLAT IlLfO IN CANNEr .PACE MAY 1997
( FILE NO: DM aD..nw•.D'A.ass1001\0.A\I117
1
City of Southlake,Texas
• STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA97-053 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Christian Men's Network
STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network on property legally
described as Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2120, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texas, and being approximately 3.97 acres situated in the Thomas
Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706.
LOCATION: South side of Ravenaux Drive approximately 500' west of the
intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Blvd
• OWNER/APPLICANT: Christian Men's Network
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service
District uses
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9)
RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area:
• E. Willson and Robin Blackwood, 280 W. Highland,
Southlake, in favor. "We do not wish to see
construction of a tall fence on the north side of the
property/south side of church construction. Not
aesthetic and not necessary."
P&Z ACTION: Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated
May 30, 1997.
STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary
411 No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements
addressed in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated
June 13. 1997.
City of Southlake,Texas
Note that the purpose of this site plan is to request a variance to
the six foot (6') fence along the south property line and the 315'
portion of the east property line. Please be aware that the `F1'
(six-foot) fence is not required by ordinance but was volunteered
by the applicant during a previous site plan approval.
L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-053SP.WPD
•
•
7
18181 UVULSs 3.I I1VU&I tl DUV �pwlfORV Qo�'-;r D� . I - --- I v'. r 1 i I
Ala P
FM� `�(M-�B . wNEY A-nsa I. �` I IE u iv c- ^' \'r,?. 7 1 ���(({{(IA�'�
PA nil ®�B1A r'�91 " •� - I VW C I�1 L ft J IfIA A I j ��11
Y A-1107 1BIC 1 I SURKY A-.k10 �_ ____J
_ IF 2B1 ` ��EEE'
1dm4A a Ac ?. • 1,
tLl IC. TA1.E N C 13.4 At v
_I IBI BID _ 2 Ac 3.79 Pc A-{')D •�._
•
Ia c•
Eg • 13.77 Ac 9.03 Ac 4.3 Ac IB1 32-8 Ac r'- 28 ` r�
• ,� i GG�{p
• tE U # 1 I, IA 2B1A M1.-�✓r--
14
i 3.85 Act 1Et DI = II2ACAc Ii i
IM ( `tb1JEASt 40`�E St.2.15 11.87 j�2'�Ac , 1 ,- tet _7.36 Ac II 1 1 1`�A 1 j130 1A3= 183C - tB2 1B
._ _' --- _ _p 1 �� 6.2 Ac - 1A2A ..
i i— e
1 i ' 1 1 i . __Lori
I -- t __..-1 i I i IBSB .,pO 187 i tAtA `-
I 1 I 1 i.J
1A1 . tl:LL1! lA S Ac
1p1�--
f i ,� CLc1Yn i 0(9
I 1 r{ ' ! ;,' 11.33 Ac 1 11y''
L. _;1�ya I i_._._._._._._.:._._ to t92 •?;f {J� IG
1 i IB Pj!` 2AI k
I 1 P.cis,a.: 2A
5.9 Ac
1 M ' J.
c�,�/�I�C�
��'• ' ,. .][_._._._._._._._.<.. VC/IEZ7 'c I 2 Kati-^2 _
i R1'FIFY A-Tl ._> ' stw\rr A-1620 N�
O A.
Sr' S v N7
N� ..
Gait '1 687Ac r
2A2A
10 Ac
E. kEtkLC
6F1 Plow d" I3EM H. 6HONGR
261 GIeV,1 — O. A A
A 5 g,R1 Y A-300
` NIP
A 56.3:ac
2J I �A i „�., '\ i 11
i 6J 'TF 4
2F n 4.y ',� ' 2 3A2A 'ywr
r r._.1._._:1:.• � j i 3A2B 4p .
8 i2Eti2E P 'Imi .U 2 y�i......rr
28 •ii ; I nA I i ''4) N
I. 6J J\/ vT 1 O 382 38 381 I
0 x I l g5 ;' Ri- 3.15 Ac I{I
I
3H —, zc2 .. --1NA '------ y ° cN► i ; wFvt 5.97 Ac
' 1`I 6DvnN. Airivy 4C2A AC2
3 3A 2A .---�� dF BF Y, 80 eD t..` 8C ® i 25.406 Ac -CS'�. 5 Ac �� t.3 Ac, ?.c=
' 1B 3EtA 3EtC '�
:09
_ Dpl� ,D . i
m 1�CIJ®PA A. • nn MO(s �r AR '\r i D acz ___ p i
ICY A-� ` NEST HICI11.44 STREET'
i EAsr ,CI
L. (a eA �/� 8A 8A8A1 8D4 iEt 1 1F IB2 - IA !--- -- c
5.53 Ac III ,4A 8 BA SAn 'V: 5A ® 8 9 _ .;.._- 1
I ..
11E AE p ; A �1::4 . A _ .`..1 i
A 4 9 BB2A •881A 9011.55003.OV' L QD 5 Ac • w .-p G` �' / I
1', 843 A 881C pI�.�G. .'f� �` .'Ri:6La Ac 1z
Ml0 .
9A2 8A15 gA9 9F as, • i i i i • ,
3819
i
t1C2 9B j i 1 i I t , Iy•
- i
11F
' i - I i i i i 1 - ���>t._.
i r,D • �• i i
1��.J7�7� ,Y.1.a.uaw HALL p p 1 ,.{
?T'`. \4` \° 1 I 1 1 4: ' ' ':
, ,
_ 35 Ac �I_ \ t 1 .f ici i .st c .-l.� -dot\�5. t
1 ; .. 1 I i f i R 1
i 1 i I i i I I \ I
i i avn.•, . r1 ,rA t o 4'I m 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I T T ) a ! l_ -.L r 1
1IIA2 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 -
•; , i iiil .. IA2 VN �' a g - sass 1
��•11 CC ;
i ` 1 11 1 j ._. .-.a fi.1L471-1L-r-1.--•r SE j;/415 A
711' if yt. , .! i 1 1 1 I 1 ; ' _ t__ _i _- 1 r i t I . 1 I ' , I
•
x ,� TRACT MAP i ; i
X' i i i ,tom \ _ }.i.l- rJ _
34 .E _pE ._._.
TR 6F 1., ) r)-
4.1 O TR 6G2 T �l�
9 1.04 O 6
1 11I,
111, +im me A . 6G 4`
128 0
10 TR 6H
2A "° _
t 2.0 0
z 11
COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH g = TR 6J
x 5.72 O
CS
na
ue
8 9
t t C. YOUNG C-1 2
4.8 �9
VILL en
NA
40.
rr" ma
AO 114 VE • _
/ W. LEE
R 0-1 .
EDWIN COLE MINISTRIES
- r
1
•.970 0 /
S—P-2 /
•••••:" 0.0
1
E. BRYANT
R il i
M
.n AG
w M S O SOO
�, I
T.SEABORN 0 TR 8C1
Y g .49 AC x
•
m AG M.WOOLEY `�
TR 8G AG ± :„
1.5 AC „ las
TR 8C3
1108F0 l» g 1.O AC g
4
TR 8D Q
j 6.25 AC _ t.,
TR TR ADJACENT OWNERS "'
8D2 8D1
"` g AND ZONING TR
TR 8G1 .82 .92 r= - H 4.08AC2 8C2A
i
II.5 AC II AC AC
SPIN #11 ROGER HUTTON 1.0
AID
• • • •
. , INDICATION
• •COY .°OT:OWT
>v, w
1:
' .a wla«r.Ma.,n.•r....«..beT•T a..•••beta.„Tel,•.,
•
4 ela NOON N.•I•••wr•....«r.w.•,Art: •.•r.r•.r•«POI.01 MN..
YL ry^ BLOCK A et
:•c.a.««,.'�•..•t I... Ilse Of.,.w.,..,«...
oa.
•
LOT 7 Lora
•
.104 la WON.
12,
. ..I `:1._.. ,��9�Fy 4 n..T. «o.•e.::.: « «w.•.the la.'v..a..of�:I.: ...or....••.al.,.«
O .w •••S.Y1.-•41.-«•D et xiw«foot.•....«r••r.•Ia•`r«t
%' .`l` 9�`� � y..'•-^* t••\•Ira r,w t.w n•T.•«,
••ti. Aor, v..I. tla:':O
..
.0 . 2 j `t'.. `T •M TOGA .It.. «.w I•••• ace
f• •... a 14.•.«e««r«..
. . I BLOCK B I NEWS S.2.-il.•-I.«•'.«•::•«r.•r•T.et•.T Let .,«... .1.
..•,.,!.. .... I LOT MI ,.�•" i,: nue• •. '0 ' ``•'''.30.. I m
a.
- ..•....„ ._.....•.4,�y,,\ I_ .e I•.o. •..•A, .....W.....«
---- •
/ ./ ' �.••^.0 ow Tumor,r.w ALL.n n T.......ON
..,...,.. wt..
., .Ino.I..«••... •Tudbhlr. .r 4C®N1Yr I.••.
•
. •T Ike, •...•
a_:. a-= - •
bean i.. ...•4_
ttl
CITY COUNCIL •
TM':. el«1 t •••••'
SOUTH LAKE TEXAS PLAT RE,PSIO.t T.»r Or.a •e« « ••••••.•l.Ot•to ••••
r 0��^"" ((tom •
LOTS 2R1 ANO 2R2,BLOCK B,
PLANNING AND ZONING iktuf RAVENAUX VILLAGE
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOT 2,BLOCK B. -
ay!(^.4- aA _ OF RAVENAUX VILLAGE,AN ADDITION J.
Sere..w.:w 07„«a r...«.•w„y«r..rr w.ttslm
n`_- TO THE CITY OF SOUTH E T MHARRANT 1.le•..• �/e.7
/�,r,Gd ✓i• COUNTY.TEXAS.IN THE TM HOOD w••z/-/J_, . •"// m.o.
SURVEY ABSTRACT NO.706,AS L•
PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME •0'}O'
388-213.PAGE 31.PLAT RECORDS, •»• - -
TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS. LK.. ,,,,,, k;
2 LOTS " 'v±w
+I -
12626 ACRES w'e '• -
,>ie
.�.. . YIn»--
NOVEMBER 1994 WARD�•� �
T.AS PLAT FILED.NCAMMET_A--_...DC RO_5.0.1C •ON,w+.«,a -J
C
E)41 541n ?1a 4
• • • .
MIIIIIMMINIMInomn
a SITE PLAN APPLICATION
/ / J' .
l� •
IP '. .' CHRISTIAN MEWS NETWORK a
..�./ / O%\Vey Y �'•
' Integrity Development
N Jim Halek
/ rave .T ...W ...•„»
—-- g `.1\ Ravenaux Village a.«o.,000
/ ,--;yy f,'VS �r An AOdI1M to the City a
O , - ." Southlake
' !t Thom.Hood.•..'•y.AC•tr••t 1••.TOO
C •,� %. /1 I'/ - \\\ '\.<!*�� Tarrant County, Texas
• z:,;,i , t _ ♦�•r' July wee
—_ .� S.ee Aw••
.�-'- '' Midim
glik` :,��iir � - E.— \*: .ter
7" Flo .....
f D _ „ .Eli , D I \ � ._
NV, ;,, ...
iiii
'' Iv 'I r _■ � � �,--' Site Data Summary Chart ...._
i •
�(t!. ' •.+. ••.• w.+.��rr•r W
I Mon
/
9 .I I ! l� -, MI01••• Z 0 X dc
IF
_ { C4
- ' 1 Law Ia.V. w.. m• CO
ill VI
7" <r 4 '
10 I> WO% WI
MI
um
. r •I
UM 101110
/' I 1 1 / / h••�•P.••..•Po**1 . a.m..•.••••r.a M••• ••■•••.A
I 0
/ I
r7T"�_
1 1 1 /
1 �� 1 I
/ / 77 , - -.
/I 1 • / -N' h.■LL� to
1 , 1 ..s.• l••
Location Ma. General Notes l•r.•
rsi I 1 1 '-' Nimil ` LT".....":1=—"........`1". ""'t:="`"."---•"""
I •�,.�•,,,,^- ( J +' •" ��•,,^— )' •._ • 7 '•.....----.. AUG :'w IJ9li Silo Plan for apt
.:.::::....••
3 u. ."••'...rr a . r r .wr.... 1 ���, Zoning for Christian
"� I 1 .1 J tlen's Network
..,.... ., nnrip .--9 I I
M Peer
City of South lake, Texas
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA 97-053 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97
Project Name: Site Plan - Lot 2R1, Block B. Ravenaux Village being 3.97 acres situated in the T. M.
Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Christian Men's Network Arch Tech Limited
1001 Euless Blvd.. Suite 104 2935 Everest Lane North
Euless. Texas 76040 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Phone: (817) 283-2898 Phone: (612) 476-4133
Fax: (817) 685-9625 Fax: (612) 404-9317
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
,:,;, f ............ ...................:.. :............. .lid•...
Note that the purpose of this site plan is to request a variance to the six foot (6') fence along the
south property line and the 315' portion of the east property line. Please be aware that the `FI'
(six-foot) fence is not required by ordinance, but was volunteered by the applicant during a
revious site plan approval.
* It should be noted that this proposed use shall comply with the development regulations set forth
in the "CS" district, except as otherwise noted.
1. Move the proposed extension of Countryside (Ravenaux) Drive farther west to ensure appropriate
access to Lot 2R2, Block B, Ravenaux Village. Consult with Staff regarding the geometry of the
new cul-de-sac and right-of-way. Construction of this extension should be completed prior to
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Phase I building.
* All fire lanes and curb radii dimensions must be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to
construction.
* All construction must be in compliance with the Masonry Ordinance No. 557 which requires
eighty percent (80%) masonry material or glass on all exterior facades.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, building plans must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to
the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and
related Permit Fees.
* No review of the landscaping is intended with this Site Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans
meeting the requirements of Ordinance No. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
I i
City of Southlake,Texas
A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit for any future phases, a
revised site plan must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
* Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the case reference in the lower
right corner to read "Case No. ZA 97-053".
* The applicant should be aware that if tabled, any new submittals that may be required for the next
scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that
time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals
must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Christian Men's Network
ArchTech, Ltd.
Integrity Development, Att: Jim Halek, 14869 Manitou Road, Prior Lake, MN. 55372
L:\W P-FILES\RE V\97\97053SP2.W PD
•
•
• ,
0 •
•
r .� SITE PLAN APPLICATION "'
for fi=.."""a-:».•m Par
," CHRISTIAN MEN'S NETWORK ; ,,
,�ate:..... •....-
,' O1Vde/ Integrity Development
'W.A. ,•
nOr. 1.•1 tat�«• Jim Hotel(
/ fk`�e ♦$ IN
Village W.:. .... .., ...1n
' i--r/ - • .e.••f••,•.f• •`- A.A./b.V IM Can M ��
/` " .•.•I••� ••• ' Southlake
' •• r_-._ssi_ - • T•.Pr.11.•...r.qt.AMIr•W M.7'O.
...-' // .r.,, /; ►•����.•• , / •�vAIv`•, Tarrant County. T..0
w•-- :❖, .` •�•• 16�' --- •'.. Sib Plan for SP1 Zoning for Christian M.n'a Network �""�+"�'
•❖. t�� l- �� R.qu.st for Varlanc. to Dsl•l. Requk.mont for 0'-O' HIBh
t ►••. 1 •� f Fancs Along South and Pwllon of Eul Property Llns
II ❖.. it I •�' .i
e- fde ts �' I \ •. j -�"i.. r r w"T..Z..r• wr�.•",a.".-..."r.r"�� z r'r..•'-
►••.•!' •. ' , ,.war - tv. wM.l'wow I.Wag OlOill
••if I • ,,,m,...72WP.,1 -MID I •eb
I ki4 ,�'', ' `�;•� Sits Data Summary Chart Cl) 0
' ►.• ,� r72 ::` � / 'i/� ,' .lei• .'�.rw ... �.
tr.....- M ;... ` cc co-
,
I •. '•?•� / .� Y ley' // ''/''/ �•••�-' .-...... N .Y
Parr
Snear
O.
4 ►❖. I fi: ; '•❖. Wil ogee Jim*Yowl
.Parr-.rWOO a&
04.00/ea
»..
r = `:4CI1 ' i-r- �'_ 4 /1 •''' *Ag41 ,.o o w. .. . ..., Q 1 6
IY •••• / / / f::: /' •�•• Y NAM M • war
w �i•. / I I t'.>.:_ >:<�.' .O w P Para.. . ...Y M. o
/ ♦.
/ •❖.� Z W
►iii i r rti r i ! .. LLy .l
1 , / / I ►.•••.. ..r,.�r• •.'" •..•r war.. P.�.. •./�. r.Y T
►...: I' I i , / /, , '' ►�!.i!f ~ w..� •~i H Y�i w lei O
.•••.' �11_� t ,, •''' •.�.•� r..aV — w+• w w Moo t/��'
►❖.•I .�.1 / / +--' — ' •I.'••••• —M .a-t... tin wn tole ono �I U -I
►❖A wl.t / , `� ►!•1.�1 .....+w•err I t ...ram wr.r r w r r.+..r+r
•♦ ,' • •P. .Par tr.r t--.-./arw w•�-
���^'fi t` , / - .4.� Q • • - --•
1.
I••••, I4 �: •
Location Ma General Notes ::. ��
❖•. `Yr '
; i I - ' - '- - , - - %KA . ................Y........+•••=.t.nor..r...• %
► .:41KV'•+,:•i❖e�0i❖.•i i❖••c°i i❖44.•❖•OW•••i•i'.,••i4••4i0•••.Ole 4 i•!�•.• • =I t=wr*.YSSL'L t 1=rermi===C.:'" /�
•........•C.•...•.••...t..••.••..•.•••..•.•.•......vat.• ..-tar w.+r-r.'.....-.. _` Y �s>_
.�_►••••.:4 r e►❖..►❖....••••❖.•..a/••❖.❖.•..•••••..❖.❖.•0.V.V.V. •••r11•••► • •rr r w r r...WI•.r.�a ae.r. ,\�1 �._"�y'
w• • ••*me Om..el-r a...-r ram••.aa+.•
( •� ,.... ! • ,. w / • .,.,.,.1•=.1:a...614,•r,.,SWAM WY.saw••••• Sit. Plan for SPt
11 7
": . II tom.-.....�..r«r..•w.....t-.rr Zoning for Christian.'let. ! a
, .......jr
1 • M.ns Network
_ S'fCS.:�TOC�x'L��sCM--• �at�
40 I
Site Plan sari.: r.ao'-0 I
lerLeort
. KO!lh -- �0 25' 50' 75'1 100' of..
;; WI Ix S i lk gE at sz
3 33 I i [ 3 . o
-m mai
I 9 9m _� T
m Ii A n �i■ ! n 1 rk s,Y ... ,I.:-„:-
Ski'/ � I r II
.:
r=■■ ■,■ = I ft
en
'tii,i' ■■■ -_- {
III. a -111A
LW/ 1
Illeil Will
1-7 .
��
1 I .ffill ....
min :____
Ill ii Elm ["0
-- i
S ;, il
1.
,.. 101 --...-E:F. I 1 1
. IN igi;
11 III
.-_-ion
NI 4
■■■�
im..■■■,
jplLi
:■wino.�!
Ft 1 U Ft Fi - �'
s ;
s
_ I` S .o S: IF q -3
m it
j
Ill
=i
_}
__n
9-2—vs..3
7--) ii--)? 2 21997 C;
1 Till N CHRISTIAN MEN'S ' i '_' 'i Fi
oQ NETWORK 4 °`
I
0kli SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ;tr
i:l
• City of Southlake,Texas
STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA97-054 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Georgetown Park, Phase II
STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II on property legally
described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in
Cabinet A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and
being approximately 3.058 acres situated in the Thomas Easter
Survey, Abstract No. 474.
LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and
approximately 700' east of the intersection of South Kimball Avenue
and East Southlake Boulevard
OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd.
• APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation
CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial
NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14)
RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area:
• G.M. Nettleton, 2611 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake,
in favor.
• Roy Lee, 2620 E. Southlake Blvd, Southlake, in favor.
"This is quality building and should be an asset to the
neighborhood."
• Howard Carr, 311 S. Kimball Ave., Southlake, in
favor: "Provided the builder installs a wooden fence
along the west property line similar to the one already
built on the (north) west property line."
•
City of Southlake,Texas
P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved(5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary
• No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendment:
1) accepting articulation as proposed.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 1997.
L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-054SP.W PD
•
•
- , ,::A uj:w
. x :: r 1,4 C.-!'t.......__...•
. . . z J 12G I
P.'a . .
:A-, 1 AANNA 5.75 Ac 505°22A
5828 ma ...--:: 5C16 xi,
av 8D ,X „• __,....c's•
/4 . .,..s•sss•
I 2A4 5.75 Ac Mig / .....,
. 1
' .-••••.. . '-'5C1621 " ,
52
S4,1°11 aism r .1 (- .-.._ .- Nem :"87-; pOW It - 7::. -.•
—.r _ ,.. , IF- -4.- -r 2 .„;....• ,-5h9--.. 4> .
II I
3A 3, '..... 3 . OS 80 Er"
• QIII.JIN.A"... sliii. :2: .
n 411111k Da .... ,..., -, 5C1 5of. ii\ .:: '4.
• .4.±
._.
Z. 111a -
, 384 MI .1.4, 11, 11 -ItA0
.......-'''.......-' : 51til ......... -I
""r•
-...-
ADD -:-: --r 5°1 110. P. ..,11F I I=Mial Mid** lb.-
.-. CM • -WY A-5 2B4A :eci ......
. .-
.' r••-•" THOM/13-4,HAN 1 4 5A4 ,.--• , 2331 2811 286 287 2812r:12A 286 - • -3
....,
..-"*. 5 29 r.i.1 i.c• .......
282 28 293 285 21 \ •, .-
\ 2A .- 5- -sat -
'UMW 20 2G 2C 289 2L 2N 25 3:0 1294 2P, e
. F .
.-. .
11
2.81A 2C1 5C1 5p.. - -----•• .... 3A2 'ilipPill
• o --\ ..•lifiri , . - •
.,........ _...i. of,Aiiil 2K Ey al 2E 20 2/2 Z11 N. • .,xxf
,
,.....•----•-• ..-..ffl •-•1 --Ii 5-. . '„
im il igt^ 2A 1
..,-'
i :2D-, :GF. .itif.g-
. eNtit ---1 -- 582 ,-
I--
1 •-- .
. INIC:P11111110:4 .CO.Y.:: _. 2A2 -",411N 007 Iri :
1 582E1 5132A
Tw"I A
NORTHWEST PKWY
EAST 1B 182 1 kf.'., IrrCil
4
. 5A
B 3
1 ,A
...,...
2A1
1."
IgiZAR i
1
i ':
'gAg IA •S -...... I I/f li„„,..- i i
....f• - -1 -..L1STP.PLACE -
API7rf °1‘1
A 1709) 2A2, A r 0
6trz•EAS1'SCUD-BAKE BLVD. s'r`d •:3 ,th., --•...,?, 1
- ! 01•41f
• . •,, .1,6'1.
__
I
i BU !It
i ; : ; i1 ; iI
7A X 2 28 182, 182 1E1 • , , 1 . •Ill _31---'1— c.. ' 1628 C-1? tAlix - • th...,-414 —• _-i — _,,,,,,.....
1 r
..-.-',•
NOON
._. _._
15 Ac "------ -0 i1.h.ggi ..
55 ,...,c, ....., 4.,,,,, • A r i jri
: ''''...
[ 2
1
18i
6A1A1
2019 3 3E 3C
• .
2
1 ' 11\ITI ---- 2
2A2A A1 A I
3 Ac • VD
litipp. - _.........^1 ''.7'...
I ADP
.......""..
„._.1 2A I ..--- --...:-•••••••••"..... '........
1111111 1 i I 1 i ‘,IC 2A3A 2 14
--- ,1._.
..,- Allir __._._._. •-•-•-••
j . p ........•
I 2.09 Ac \
' r... 11A 118 1...
'5
, , c . ! ! ! ! ! j \ •10' ........- ,
allhil' tt-tt-71-'T "°../ ''..,--------- ID i EL• -T .
ly .
..—
,..-.
Z ,15.e._0:1 ,
-.-.-.-
'',,k• i . ! :1(0)1jt N i ili i F 3A LA 414 17_EtAil rN1 '' ----- i •;. I ,i•• SLRLE' A-171 !. !
__
._. : i i i i ii i 1 irrS / 3° • --.-..
--.-6iev_i..m11.4545
% 110 c. 3 3B .--•
.---- ••-- •A 1 i i 1 .%. t i v— to( ----
----
... •:y
6,...- 6E1 4A4 1 , i LI 1181 .._.-.--
.%
t .
51,057 ! I I i i. ED 4 —
i
I1D5A1 in.....'. iii1
1A3 --- f. 10 20 Ac i 1104 iiii
1 (.... - '.---1 1
1 I 383 3 .
. GRAPEVINE CITY UMI r
7i• vq.. HALE) -- ,
, , i , 3 Ac
•.- A-803 5A1 i:1 6.15 Ac
1----
--' NAINBcm Sr.
:1 E •*".
..- .
A2A 2A 28 .. 2C1
.•* I II
1.55 e
1A2C
1A2 683 68 681 IA 11: 1
2C
at 10591 ‘ \
elg55N
...
--- A v.-----„- 1AL
usIg
Ac .10 A;'• 114 Ac 682 'd — 1 ‘ ovi- 61 Ac
I \ \ rn Irl C)
TRACT MAP
Ai!:-- • - rfA6 .-1'''
. !
...____,______,___..._._._._...._... 1 !1•451z
.6111k
. .
_._
IA 1_11 .12:!z-ful.:/ 2F1 I IA ' 2-W-3--BBCO ,PA t-- \\
I i
T e 41, 184K al
,,,,,, r,9., 18106
.\\:\ It...... 1
6.3 Ac I .
'- -•"P ,e.,.z Tr747186C1
,..-''
c 15.5 Ac
i ,
'% •-•8 ' .,‘},j1,7-.1'
TR 6A1 2
151 O 2 r------_
eiAIW ——„ i
TR 6 1
_ r'
TR
o R o I TR 2C M "' _'^_ .t---- -- - �.,L — CA KI?0LI
ss AC , *RAPEVINE— OLI
TR 2B1
1011 p 7 , -
TR 2B RRI 7 .1
.7�479 AC I Cr' S S ,� fit,\
fgE 65 r1flTR2E1I 1 8
-,____
2osol k. U � `c�
1.1 8 is2 in :15 ,7 -
7-
_____________L______,_ .1bil ,2'424
I
I
q ^I
13 . • .
N Mill* ..
TR 2A
1 5.73 AC
I IIII
1
1
,.. ._ la
• 1
jT
\- l bill ,
1
1 '
iz ' a
1
I . -
1 GEORGETOWN PARK ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING
I
30-May-97
ClSkantaiimst
CAVALLINO PROPERTIES LTD,
02 TFYAC,STATE OF C2
'� I 03
I LIBERTY BANK C2
I 04 TEXAS,STATE OF C2
ADJACENT OWNERS 05 EATON,RAREFY E 6 CHARLOTTE J AG
. C6 TEXAS,STATE OF AG
L ,,07 TEXAS,STATE OF AG
A N D ZONING 09 TEXAS,STATE OF AG
09 NETTLETON,G M AG
SPIN
u ^( 10 SOUTHLAKE,CITY OF CS
1r7 DA RREL,L r`-,V'LIr' 11 WILLIAMS,ROGER GLENN AG
S I- 12 JAMES,ANDREW L JR SF-1A
13 CARR,HOWARD E JR AG
14 CO2;LLC C3
15 SOUTHLAKE KIMBALL VENTURE LTD C3
----___En_______________________________ 10 TEXAS,STATE OF C2
'7 GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS C2
7 _
• • • •
..... NO.1'IiS SITE DATA ^�
APPLICANT:LICAN: OWNER CONSULTANTS& MY PLAN VJ
...�, w .....<,...,-. :.1 a.;: .:w "' GEORGE TOWN PARK
_�« M.,....,,.......,.-, LOT I AND LOT 2
SOUD. ., SITE PLAN w• . . JOH Fero, y..,,.. "',•Sr. o,
('{ «.+«-••..,o >:..e ..vr+..+`y.+¢-+a�..r..i.•.>•....1. PREPARATION
TARRANL CO.TEXAS A
{(2 .�tvw.•.y..... PRFPNUTKKI DATE,O//q.%
.,., ,.. D SLLNG ZONED'C-2 PROPOSED ZONING,C-2 -6
«..a._r.ea �. —TY Pon MA ll 40•420 LAND USE DESM,NATgM MIXED
e
/WW
,�.., ,u..w.. - -1ria
--- S.
O LEGAL DESCRIPTION lI. I _ ✓.. t
i l i=I ! �. ! SITE DATA 1
AaNA ACC. F.
C�n/� webat aes`' `4 ,,N ;- _ _ - �- _ -1-.. •
- ., ;.,1.0f 1 FOR NAY T I-
T..''.4. ': •....>...,.,........,.... i- I'•'w I — ...._...... - .. ww.eow •.,«. ,w.n omrae MR.,
..ox n.a- 'n.,sw•e y /(
N IFF
wv,...,•w,w...,t.. a _
... .My,y __—.. _— -- 1 ..cas.c.rs sus.r.es ...e, ! .sce AMU. 1016 It
_ ar.css• la* as.ew. cv.,cs saw. _
AY to ,w.-.aw.,we-.,sss,..sr,.s -ir«v ovn w s.«arw — __—__-- a_ _•___- -_-__-__..oas so.,..
I (PRICYsi
�'. , .-,..m"rrn:i-__-----__. ' t..o w...ss..r....1m [- �aw...s
acwee..a ,-,
gllart w
11Mill
m a.a......s ,r g r X LOT I-PRASE 11 FUTURE:LrT!E; 74'
jyl ;l /, //
• �. _ - 11,17:" ..'
( F .,em �. .r-1--s4i {t tiyi�' a..o.ssu•scw..>.....Qo (Q••�tun w.tc,.,•rrc.tu.apr../ Q ! !:! ; a N.1 .i1 . 1 I L-.w . I.4.1Y!,i,i II I 1 _/1b �f-. $ / / /, CDr �M rt 8 ..a<,,, a. r --: ...::tomD _, moos mo.o I a Y I ira` b��r's�ves I I . 'I I ! II' - - •
T ! ' '11 , I . I J.p ! I Sid -S � �` ..� /1. 'ers
, - sown
-It--/' •9.4 / ,
...se�,k...e,.,swss.. *A •• L a ro
c, i I LOT 2 FUTURE DEVFI.OR,LL•NT 'v li w..0
41
,k s Y. .
. 1 ' ; .../.:..".,_''',.!,.l.:T.:1,12,1..-:
NO
..1. .: :::.....w .... � ....... I AUG 46-�( ..
' .....v.-,>..,...... ; ..:..b %i ,. L;L� sujr ` �1 s»'w
City of South lake,Texas
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Illase No.: ZA 97-054 Review No: One Date of Review: 5/30/97
Project Name: Revised Site Plan - Georgetown Park Phase II being_1.38 acres of Lot 1, Block 1,
Georgetown Park situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Realty Capital Corporation CnK Associates Inc.
2425 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 150 2045 N. Highway No. 360. Suite 160
Southlake, Texas 76092 Grand Prairie, Texas 75050
Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 640-0100
Fax: (817) 488-5257 Fax: (817) 633-3309
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/28/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. Correct the graphic scale to match the written scale of 1" = 40'.
2. Change the title to read: "Revised Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park."
•. Label the metes and bounds on the common property boundary between Lots 1 and 2.
4. Provide the Bufferyard and Interior Landscaping Summary Charts on the plan. Provide the following
general note to the bufferyard chart: "Plantings of all canopy trees on the site shall be a mixture of
50%two-inch (2")caliper and 50% four-inch (4') caliper minimum size." Show and label the width
and type of proposed bufferyard along the east property line on the graphic. Distinguish the bufferyard
areas with dashed lines and cross hatch or shading.
5. Label all entrances and exits to buildings.
6. Dimension the distance from building to property lines.
7. Show the location, orientation, type and height of any intended lighting, signs, and exterior auditory
devices.
8. Label both required fifteen-foot (15') side building lines.
9. Show, label, and dimension utility, drainage and common access easements on or adjacent to the site.
10. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant.
•1. Show the location of any proposed hydrants.
rI -
City of Southlake,Texas
12. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement,
curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc..
13. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information. This should correspond to a City
approved benchmark.
14. Provide a summary chart showing all proposed variances (i.e., bufferyards, screening, etc.) to the
"C-2" zoning district regulations and/or Corridor Overlay Zone requirements. This should show the
referenced zoning district, the existing requirements and the proposed variance.
15. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c.
on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a
property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown
on the attached articulation evaluation chart.
* The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received
at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/9/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the
following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17"
revised reduction must be provided.
* Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA97-054"
in the lower right corner for ease of reference.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that only one monument sign and
one attached sign per street frontage is allowed on the site. Any deviation will require a variance
approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a permit.
* Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 12' from the proposed building without processing a
Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills
greater than 4 inches within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted
unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator.
* the applicant should be aware that is a more intensive professional use such as a medical/dental office
is placed within the site the required parking will increase and that prior to receiving a C.O. for any
building space all required parking must be in place.
* It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required
fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter
Street Fee. Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
i ..
City of Southlake,Texas
* A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709.
• All mechanical units and satellite dishes must be fully screened of view form F.M. 1709 and from
properties within 400' having residential zoning or a low or medium density residential Land Use
Designation.
Denotes Informational Comment
att: Articulation Evaluation Chart
cc: Realty Capital Corporation
CnK Associates Inc.
L:\W P-FILES\RE V\97\97054 S P I.W PD
•
iJ S
City of Southlake,Texas
Articulation Evaluation No.!
Case No. ZA 97-054 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97
evations for Georgetown Park Ph. II, Lot 1, Block 1 of Georgetown Park
•ived 4/28/97
Front- facing: North Wall ht. = 25
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 75 16 -79% Yes 75 22 -71% Yes
Min. artic. offset 4 4 0% Yes 4 4 0% Yes
Min. artic. length 4 14 250% Yes 6 12 100% Yes
Rear- facing South Wall ht. = 10
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length { : " t ..:? 34 "1 °.a t.�: 7!:;3't14:214',iVt:-:14014:7-ifff°:•:7;7— :` to-
Min. artic. offset 2 4 100% Yes 2 9 350% Yes
Min. artic. length 9 23 156% Yes 9 23 156% Yes
Right- facing: West Wall ht. = 21
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 63 26 -59% Yes 63 26 -59% Yes
Min. artic. offset `ch 5,.; W ..2 33° = .�° 3 8 167% Yes
.._-as 'k +...c.»9� ...
Min. artic. length 4 6 50% Yes 4 6 50% Yes
•- facing: East Wall ht. = 21
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 63 20 -68% Yes 63 26 -59% Yes
Min. artic. offset .3 < 2 '' -33% , 'No 3 8 167% Yes
Min. artic. length 5 6 20% Yes 4 6 50% Yes
S
• • •
•
•
..
,__
_ . _ ____
....... .....................
11 -6.,,
___
..... ....._ _......,...24:1;•- ='.=...
t_-2. ..... ,r sn E DATA
�""•� `ffi' -- - - REVISED srre PtwN FOR
.—r G GI TOWN oral
TARRANT la
"'CO.TEXAS
�, ...,r.c•i ^' •�.^6:s�e - - ••- - ` 'h-...uiL - a LkNOEYJSI USE
C ZONED C-2PROPOSED ZONING:C- Ca
AM
/ 1111411111111 ' alai i � • Phi _ . Wu. 1? O.
r
- II
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSULTANTS& 1 �p{y "!• ;; tp� _ f PPPP����PPtr ; .ii iI _ S
at®iti- -, i i ,�3iflY a s ,.11 s it 1.,1�1t�l JE9=•'• --.0,..,a I - _1011 I
..r.e.r yw_.....eww.nw..wv.....w .wl.r.syY p _...
6HI 1H
a r..w uv.•r_...w.�... vwrM ••
fA®l 6�dQ/ 4 CaMwuf
.�.''.......sr
.w..w rs..r...��rw.rw.... w.:.r.w..an ....rrr...... .r. w r
,„�..✓wwr..w. ..."*".-...rvm..w.. r�.ow.w•rcwre .wa rr ...•r •.a n
N �.w .. .v...._•'.. ow NOTES _ —� - �,...�.r.—
w..ww. 'EOM �p4�' Q \ryl"'1:1 .
t c utyll
vavrn_.ny � . r - o- . w . —
•
•0 law m ' , A ®+ u i: : h � i ' �� ! 7.' :" .>, : . .m. �•s, �:w �'"'"��...�
.........," :._.... . i a a m I ,uur .::::in: `a ,„, irt •
�
. .._._.....�,":. .- • - tffGIS^mi. I aaw ar.ru.•
RE ED SI/&PLAN
_- l �_ r v
1000 f1201
j
•
i )
..a.....03101. • . 4 ._., - it ;,�' jl .aw. ...
A
•
-1 Lwr .'.P.` ._ , i/7�� /•l .wo ur•n.w..w...rn
..w�.e n.w.r.w.w om IIr -.t- 1 PHASE 1 / ;, ,
li.-c__ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _ __...1.: T, - -, 1-___-11„,:.. .-:LI.::.,..;,.._ i .
/14
I Ni f� ' n. NOM
..,o..e n....tl I .wo..re n«.«.r......eo 0110010.10
' .worr n..w.w...m, LOT 2 FVIVRii DLVFLOPMNxr 1/44 , ..w..n.w....n..c
11 • / /1
•
•
i am
__ 3j 'REC'D JUN 10 1997 - A�
.___.--_____..
MA OILIS
.r.....
vafir
VOW MO
WPM al•ILO
/
.^•"•.. . se in
�..r
000b
I
• A—I
City of Southlake,Texas
• STAFF REPORT
June 13, 1997
CASE NO: ZA97-058 PROJECT: Site Plan - Southlake Oaks, Phase II
STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II on property legally described
as Lot 2. Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texas. and being approximately 1.8685 acres situated in the
Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686.
LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410' east
of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and West Southlake
Boulevard (F.M. 1709).
• OWNER/APPLICANT: 1709 Southlake Oaks, Ltd.
CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial
NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7)
RESPONSES: None
P&Z ACTION: June 5. 1997; Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary
No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendments:
1) delete requirement#l a(minimum spacing of 250' as required
by the driveway ordinance);
2) delete requirement #1b (required throat depth of 100 feet);
3) amend requirement #9 (forty-foot (40') rear setback line) to
allow as shown;
4) re-state that the out parcels are not included in this site plan
• approval.
City of Southlake,Texas
S
STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review
Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those
requirements in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated
June 13, 1997.
L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-058SP.WPD
S
S
-11?-z
J I ,_._.W.J y•y •••-SURSEY A- •.I I r1- I II lI I I I•LST hlGr#.a•.f =,- I JL_ _ .. ___-
® .A
EA 8A 2All EAtE BA 8A8A1 m g i,8811 1111
5.53 Ac He 8A4 AA 8 13A5 SA q 6 265
11E IIE BAIT A ; �' 1 ge [...-,I
�' p 4 P,B2A} a61A 5o� �MaLY cE_- ---
BAS ill
Pbtr J A or GO .T�.6a A.
`.. BA2 BATS BA9 5A •,•1 ! i i i i ! IIiii
9A Bala •
I _ it BAI ,- 1 i- i r - i
I- C2 111C:A 11C2 98 iD ii W-
•' i I 1 I 1 '
I.
I .\ T ,1 I I i i I - - ��y.
i
_ e •,ram ` l•.\o i I I I4. -i , i NALL�
_p+� i •\ ` it •-A
V IItA,.i�l:
__ -,-. i i B i i � 35 Ac ���AS 14 i •i i r II
•
L,.1 \ I i I 1 '\, ' � 1 I l■/ a N I 1 1,CR
\,v • '.L.r-TL'_r,1 ' i i i 1 i i 1 ! 1 IA A simumnil T•i ...i .,. ? IjJ.� '-T
iiimirimmusgs
1. ` _: •.^\ _I J' "\ \•J:L<M♦ -'-'1 --�'- i ,rtb-1 1 .-g, ;• 1 ! i /-•\ •`\, .\ ,.
Y T
i ! }.�• _ i i %a; \ C i i, h1 , i -'# 0A --F-'- —. i i i '\ iI i --.1-- ..
..... i ; \ Ar; _. �` �,r(}.iL/' i I __ - i _+- --F-' -3, i i i }-..i.1._�'.. e.'5 i
•
•
s •
`�-i-i., • \�.Q._. I C ! \\. ._.�r..,., w.�� _ i i I ! ,yy - `T'_.T._._t.-._- e:
\u. - \ I i \ ?..A, i \- ZC i I I t' i . . \1_• _ \ \ aa,!
k ,Y ►tv_. Z.ucln3)._.4 - -. 3A1A NNiAL
; ; i f Li T LI=R f �r..,/�- -mAL N� ; ; i f 1 i i i i • i i i
a % II i i I i i ` V 1 I • PA I i i i \ ! i 1 i i 1.�, i i i
. . 381
\EY A-666 i %
''.1
y 1..( � • }JIA 3N -•riul
X.-I[ }s,8 x/• ,Gig'! ! ! L_
ja3 .,.'...., / -4-...j 3 i ,
I i • " .-.-. '1, ILI 5... ii
PPrr
- r�
�' *EST TNLAKE BLP , ( !�•ii "..RC y�y�_�,r. r�o
-- _^ ___ -- r 3C Al 5, 1 S*I R 58 SDI -`-
0 Ili ., 3C2 ..
03
�.' ;�. '� ,� _ a ,� igi.el ,p�L 19 10 Ac 5 Ac 17.2.19..43 Ac 4.5'1
•
•
•M.` s` • _ 1--.. -LT• 1. �1'\, 1 �-' is A< 58 -
�'�'`. r .-_;1--` 'W I -' '>.' �.''�x' • err _. _.� ,'�._. \i .-: 3( • \ --- - - ,
CI
/ill
iffil ......
• A` \ ./ �`'_ ` d if,, pi III'pl.'--k \ . �_._ _ ' - ,`1'h�j q. `.
.% 7 !•A 'A Iv'
�•mrc\n; 1 -. ._ ` ! .�r..r' "�'-.ui !I! 1 }c -(ATE'.P1 ME._,..T E.. O.
ri. . . AG
i - •)_.• .rn.-a. 1 -' -I C. r,. 1F I = I i I'•`• [6}A
CP
� . . .�4i p)� (- 5 A -um 48 W. 4: aUA' o-
,,` a _ }
• ,� •
i_. as I rs�_ 7,' ® 2C :::1� 2C2A 2rtA-
er.
�i • • • • • �1 BULL �iy,�1�N �Np'45 Ac , «5• -'
1i
Ay,...0"I•l'l"itI., e,..
M (� �/� �p , •7
. �` j YANG ^ it
YUI i i \ SURIEY A-5d1 i 1 ..
' •,•.• . ,.I...A...ali'''.•' .-. i 1 •i 1I 1I II
F.
1 . LY 111-1Y.' . J J!J< LLff 1 I
4 Ac
-. ' -t ` ,\ 1 I- Ri i INC TO PAR. 1 ° .—
.I
r I jj •..`� - 1 / 1, �1 � J I�. �I •11'lY.l:'il L 1 �ill T.
® — __ ` _Leg , _ TRACT MAP I•Ir.
l; 1 � 1 ply , . _
BEAU r \ ` _ ` `
TR 3C1 • TR 301A
•
10.80 AC a 11.140
i
•
TR
R
9.9
33 w ,,,
C .10
•
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
TR 3C AG i TR 30 G.
iB 1 4.2758 ® • I ii. 31[, S O
AC /
Tr 3.2842 0 3D4 ,14 TR 3D5 1.3538 0
-
8 0
—
C-2
��TT
R"38 ,•.• , •., TR 3C2 3D4 C_2 110�p1 TR 1
�8 AC .88 O o O , .,... .. Ji INN 1S 9.90
FM 1709 SHADY OAKS LMTD. r7
= S FM 1709 SHADY OAKS LMTD.
- - _ _ - _ - _ STATE OF TEXAS �- _ _ _ _ _ -
/ / STATE OF TEXAS
n » \
TR 2C1 R r x 2A1 TR 281 .182 0 =„ `
n ta
".�gR TR.3C2
4? 20 TR 20� H DBgRRY��; _ i C-2 �� .548 Ac
.067 o � 05 C 2 3y'. w
n. )J TR 3A1 t-
n. E
21 g. •
® GCOMMOREEN/ .107 L. CONNER 25 0 3'
66 / CC
,x .908 O No 1/ 81 U Y
to .491/O • n7 ,aS /
22 i 2 C-2 " /.
,x ' TR 2C t, ' 3
�"
23 l 1 2.96 AC "
n
LAKECREST HOMEOWNERS `in ('J
, .
•
24 �� bo 21 � '' ' 4 C
if. I i• 5 R. REUTLINGER
•
25 . 1 . 20 . 1 M
1 1 19
• "° 0* l
24 - ADJACENT OWNERS i
'" 18 AND ZONING /
19
27
"I , ,� Z 1`7•
ISO SPIN #13 JIM GOGGIN 71
19 g
•
<1-2/ .ao
}� TR �N?
.1 • T� Z♦
1111,11, S'Xb'O �'7HLQOS y� !10
x 1.IOj a aa' i9 ' � g
lliiiii' i, JU UJdojanaQ Ue[d. air, r4 H l a I: .� 1 , 1 Q
b
off •.3 O) ;1 .�
Tr - W,.O o iM:.s .� R
oJft= °� '< = 7 ¢- a_Yi fief a a `" --1--J
%' 91 ' a a T •Ii!
i 9: ;I
1 i -T a- �i ._, . -6 Y h.0.._ S1 L, ice.-'^.... , I U i ..... vJ
..4 Vg. • ilE- i 44 I .
. d .. " 7.....:.. ... no.
•
ma's •
-<. �. Lt., 'i _ '! l.li•'!r t.•a 8
o_ u , n _. _., - - \\\\ .H ,[ r ate—zia I \v ..
W N N. `7 .t : , 1. -••..i
•
::-•t:--4-.!- • , 1 I
•
....
"y 1 _ ® --•- 7..
• • _ Iif
t ' 11141 figJJ v
.d' •,• sit 31 •.f�t 15(` r L 1 3 • `.,•
-. ..,, P. idt <
1 di...,.r a ;i. _A t
v.- _ ••R-' : -�,e (yam i _ y[• �s r I�� _
•••'. (11111 .1.1111 >
..i I I. ,
` • . V
•
•
t xi
.._ •. - ; , I •-- \I - ; ;.-•, - ,:.-
.._ - �••'.1 '\ ► -{! `•.. fit, ' •'.' �� .—
' _ �1_I—�_ iris 1 ;\ i 1r�••• t•` —�
/-... .:..,_,, _ ,� r l , T mac. a •
•
. ••AK DRiv .... —-- _ A..
it
•
. 3(ii w Y
' i 3 t: -11� Ill 2 3131 l ii 3 4 t • i .sus
§ :. glIp bb gt k.' I1C i
_ 7
City of Southlake, Texas
0 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ase No.: ZA 97-058 Review No: Two Date of Review,: 6/13/97
Project Name: Site Plan - Southlake Oaks Phase II being 1.87 acres located in the Littleberry G. Hall
Survey, Abstract No. 686
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
1709 Southlake Oaks Limited James. Harwick& Partners, Inc.
16800 Dallas Parkway, Suite 150 8340 Meadow Road, Suite 248
Dallas,Texas 75248 Dallas, Texas 75231
Phone: (972) 250-0008 Phone: (214) 363-5687
Fax: (972) 250-1950 Fax: (214) 363-9563
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/9/97 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787.
;7�1�'t/�;G:. /r.:., •`.;;2.gw.,..: .vr?L:;£%'r7k:...+.•mem:•::::.::f:;.;raj.:,r,.ix:t: .::::::::...:::!.cC•:'::ax•':::::::::::..g.,.,:..:.::::.::::::.:.r,..::.f:::::::.•:::::::
* The scope of this application and review is the commercial/retail building, its elevations and the
two driveways shown on the plan. The applicant understands that a revised site plan will be
required when a specific user has been determined for the easternmost portion of Lot 2.
•
1. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways ingressing and egressing the site
according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634:
a. The location of the easternmost drive is approximately 195' from the centerline of the park access
drive. This does not meet the minimum spacing of 250' as required by the driveway ordinance.
(P&Z recommendation: delete this item)
b. Both the existing drive in the southwest corner and the additional proposed drive in the southeast
corner do not meet the required throat depth of 100 feet. (Both are approximate 38').(P&Z
recommendation: delete this item)
c. The easternmost proposed limited access drive does not appear to meet geometric designs
required by the city.
2. Remove or relocate the parking spaces on the west side of the building because "all parking spaces
required shall be located on the same lot with the building or use served." (§ 35.2) (Note that the
applicant is apparently proposing to relocate the lot line to alleviate this situation.)
3. Although the bufferyard chart shows intentions to provide the required bufferyards, the notes suggest
that a variance to these requirements is requested. Please clarify desires regarding bufferyards. (Note
that the applicant is apparently proposing a temporary bufferyard off-site along the easternmost edge
of pavement.) Correct the west required bufferyard to 5' - Type A. Note that there are several (5)
incorrect calculations of plant material requirements (all in favor of the city) in the bufferyard chart.
7 f -C4
City of Southlake, Texas
4. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a
• mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30")
on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. This may require additional
shrubs over and above those required within the adjacent bufferyard.
5. A forty-foot (40') rear setback line is required by the Corridor Overlay Zone (Section 43.11). It
appears that the applicant is seeking a variance to this requirement. (P&Z recommendation: Amend
requirement to allow as shown).
6. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant. Show the location
of any proposed hydrants.
Other Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations:
1. Re-state that the out parcels are not included in this site plan approval.
* Note that City Council has previously determined that the exterior finish proposed here met the
masonry requirements of the corridor overlay zone.
* The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting if tabled must be
received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared
until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x
17" revised reduction must be provided.
III
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate buildingpermit is required
pq
prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that only one monument sign and
one attached sign per street frontage is allowed on the site. Any deviation will require a variance
approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a permit.
* Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 12' from the proposed building without processing a
Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills
greater than 4 inches within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted
unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator.
* The applicant should be aware that is a more intensive professional use such as a medical/dental
office is placed within the site the required parking will increase and that prior to receiving a C.O. for
any building space all required parking must be in place.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required
fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter
Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709.
All mechanical units and satellite dishes must be fully screened of view form F.M. 1709 and from
properties within 400' having residential zoning or a low or medium density residential Land Use
Designation.
7!f' 7
City of Southlake,Texas
* Denotes Informational Comment
et: Articulation Evaluation Chart
cc: 1709 Southlake Oaks Limited
James, Harwick & Partners, Inc.
L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97058SP2.WPD
O
1
•
7/�-8
Articulation Evaluation No.!
Case No. ZA 97-058 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97 .
vations for Southlake Oaks Ph. II, Lot 2, Block 1 of 1709 Southlake Oaks
ived 4/28/97
Front- facing: South Wall ht. = 20
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 60 50 -17% Yes 60 19 -68% Yes
Min. artic. offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 3 0% Yes
Min. artic. length 13 16 23% Yes 5 13 160% Yes
Rear- facing North Wall ht. = 20
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 60 50 -17% Yes 60 50 -17% Yes
Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes
Min. artic. length 13 13 0% Yes 13 13 0% Yes
Right- facing: East Wall ht. = 20
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23% Yes
Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes
n. artic. length 8 13 63% Yes 12 13 8% Yes
lirt- facing: West Wall ht. = 20
Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation
Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay?
Max. wall length 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23% Yes
Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes
Min. artic. length 8 13 63% Yes 12 13 8% Yes
S
7K- 9
0 0 0 , •
i •-m-m.
SITh DATA SUMMARY CHART
. .. . _._..,lee po 1176 MIL, . .
. .. • •
• . .' .
(.61V 01 SOLOILL AO . Brim ded start of on 9.1-97
. •• CV 0-010C/01 II
1•••••••••••••••. • .• . .•• . •••.....,."i
C....""."... 01 '..."‘....°a• WO."171 flai'Ll0'7C.0.1%(''SILII.001 . .. . . • . El t i FIL al ed constructirm completion: 3-1.98.., - ,..,,..• .; AT LP Of nt oc no,u•c r..-4 vow SW.LL014 0 •. . . .•• •11000.101 1..1 . . . . Existing 7.1311111g,C-2,Local Retail/Commereail
,„, SI 100ANDS.100 I.WIG MCA fo • • • •,, 011.1 00 ALM AI /
f 0 Me LAN 4.0-•ArII OLP • i ,MIR Mai OLP ; • "
' •
IAA] S HB•574 4"1 753./7' (314-03.1.07.N. Existing 1-11.1).:Medium Density Residential ...,•:•,.....:::',:-.Z."
• .f ' r -7,1"c -:AA........-.4-si.. . -t -;-,7",7,7i7TO71.11.1, ----,07'---111.4t.' /4"-----'- -177
l'i - . Sir` i ..,, AA-ii . •• ' -
Site Net Acreage: 1.26 A:54,875 S.F.
, ._ ..
. , .,,,,/ _. ifirritz 46,,,,..-,,,,,.1-1--, , ; .Li \ ;.,.: 1,..T.L. 29.43"..%
.-i .-' • , ' . .4 4 Recluired Interior Landscape Area=50%of .... 1:::1
-.•' r• :- k 1%. ) ' '-ti 4 e . : : . I
• . -6 'Offe**;/'' ,.......3.. '.•li....,.,. • • •
• Intr nor Landscape Area provided=7,100 S.F. CU q)
• •
• ,. '.''',..2,-...7.-.--• . .•..... ',\•.•••• .......-..• , Percentage of Site coverage:=14.6%•
Es::::':::,,c.:: ii,\221-)k.i ..,,, ..( -,6:01 .1r: ::.1,...l. ..,...,,..... . ,...
(PHASE D.' "--. i ' • r.,...,k117,0:• •.,wastaot, 14,,..,. Pert entage of Pavement:=36% Qv Citi
PROPOSED NF.W. ... t2)
. X , ' • ii000 Arel of open space(uncmcumbered)=64,460 S.F. .....„ Cl)
• MO,SAD RAO
.i. . COMMERCIAL/ . - . % U l'q 04
Percentage of Open Space=85.4%
. . RETA
IL7.,...'itly'j.."LZ:NG"..,4::.:.64.1.0 464--\-'is.;:e,.:7....• 1 \ ct a.4
----;".,:.GRO ORG SIR 11..2 Outside Storage:N/A,0%
.•F.11..643.0' 0.1.PM so et s ll GEER
'''''EP-IA •I. 'i. ...8•14.1 ‘\ ---._.....;,•...V'OD OIST 10 7...* %. Tota•Building Area=11,900 G.S.E. q ) gy.)
/- .[A".;,...%-7----N -I '1 °/°°-°-r'“° \ r - ..'.\'• All tc,be Local Retail Use
. .....,
•
-
,o \ - • _,.,
I. I/ .•'. \ I ' -....4 " • • Total Floor Area=11,900 G.S.F.
,,,,..,,_I ,.., 4._ .;__ ,,i -•-'...,S .... m„,,,x.x.,'..--i.--t.1 Parking spaces required:(1/2004=60 (1..)
__ •
•H %
t
FAST 1X/0 .
RFSTA WANT t• -1
I • --[W. . ••
I . .;: .•Air•COL.L0011 .... ''.L.;1 Parking spaces provided=77
Loading spaces required:=I
Loading spaces provided:=1 c;14) lo1/4:::) o..,
....-
. .
imi ,ThRts 1 i .. ... L00S TVP 1 . .. Nimmber 4[Stories=1(20'.-0")
1,09 lAIADE 0ULS LIP.SIRA1101/ ., ,
Il. ,•. I
1 PAO 881814(111..••••:COX RAl ,•',.,..., . . _i t•.• 24.1.11 N.vat LAWS ... f''...Ihr'Sr0OLM'O‘NrS7:0, '11...C2"s,"41"' I I 0 T 1. : '• '-i Maximum Height=35*-0"
PANINERS.,8100 1.061A Pt 10 RD , wan S..KM an ..:0.10 C-2 LOCAl Al 1•8 CowartiA I.0)
SUM 2013.DALLAS_IF.7S271 ,•Ur 0 • . ,,,,, of 7
FIA/LOPLS TVP - , r.trie - .1 V
1 : +v,. • ' .. %2 '44
.• 25AM,..Pl. (II it14,1, .' . .....' St•, .0
. i §I --...'1.'1 ...g, : .:i PROPOSED VARIENCES SUMMARY CIIART q "...I CI)
• 1 V,74r1 ,,-
i: LI:. : :il 1.Building mthadi line,si North property line.change homier-0'
(014?,0 w
•
i .._1.1;fa.: i'.'','II., to 21T-0-to match setback line at Mate!of develorenceL 12, . ,......_.0.,40 :r . .. ..... 2. Joint Access DAAmexl kw Puking spaces along the Wt.,.
.cu.
----••• •
c c, 0 Ex
•r .r41 or< I
1 air sr.,•t I ar ,i/N.,'1,,,' t,
--P..' ... , ... ." ••
ozrA -. 7„..,,p11,4..: ,.' i,.
,rte. ,64, ...,., •• ,,,, t .
0 ._.___•,,,„,,,, ,...••,, i
-4. .....- ,1, g .....„11..... property line,Fun=amendment to Plot.
r1LosH6 ''' .11.0 edt liet...,K.11. 'C'Per .."..x / '• ''''
Ve.,
. TIT/1051 ••••L,0 ,•• t , '
. ' . • 'I : .--- -:--;,.--4 -..
1 4
I 1 z ‘...1 •,....,
1 ••013•10 Cora 010101 V Pt S00100 ./ ,- ;",:. 1,°, 'r t 1 ROI C 04C171 OW
/ONO L.A LOCAL Pt IAA COM/1PC.,' , , . . ....., ....0.- • elOC.SL 01.1.1 11.0 I VI F •sra sane to. i o 0. :,,'
_ _ __ ........,...,...... ,,,, „ ...
tal 0 I:S .1
'I. :.. 9, .:.::.:.1 ::2•1' . •
111
z 4, r.''t- " ;., ' -- - -4.47,ort.511/ worn.ewe.i Par. .....-• 1..
I JO-le 10IAL SPAM. . i _A'1 `.• • :il el.g
--. ., tTF,
4-
V4e 6 iA6
PAW10/0„1,r 11. 6 . 4,‘
'i
..
It eAljrEchiFteFcItPs
::',,,,,,,64.% p.44:141.,OCCESS,'•.,i !" ! -1-1.1-1• t!.: :A}ire.dem•.'"' 1,--, 1;
, 57 ! Java Hersrid sltesten.ke.
ii .. . • All OE 1PEASUREIV,;;'I u LW 0 Ads.Joel Sarin
141111111 5-7. . •• ...A.,,....P.1 omit ctiri ; . ! : ,:!Al 186 POPLI......;.1... 1 g Dan.rens 7.17JI
.• I„"..' !.:o"..',..;IV 0/144-Wr. I i .; i VOL 1164 PG WA
t• 0.-.16 0 '.•' . 1.0 .00••5•4,0.1 ORLS 110 Telqlvar(111)kU917' .• ! % 13.0....-5/'44.",..,,„,,,,, so 9.4 .' 058.151 .41'. : . .. '.'.'.'.1" rota C-2 LOCAL ACI.couAtaut „02440,4„46.4
.-.-. ----.-.-.-. .--.- .-.---•.-.- .
.,,,,,r-•:. Or....-
-- - -
MENINX : •6"G •
Intl.COM 01.1, .
ALCAPP IL APP100• 001/litaS AS . . . . .
MOW MASI.I ... LLICA.0 I VP ......... ..6 3 i
--i I Lill'•RC1‘ ' r.-..,..r., ,3 - _.•• . . -
.. i
acm
. , •
... .6 \\s,...:- -31.C.3-Oa).. ... . ..• .•'. .., LAMP.COLO COI
37.-0.l
---- ..
.• !•
!
• ... inv:Ay..••_•_- i ........ . . . ..1. •.
70 . SUMMAR IECHARI•11101/ERVARDS. I OWNER:.. . I
ro iiiii6aot o ow.ii.iiii trox -- -
1709 SOUTULAICHOARS.LTD. SITE LOCATION MAP
• By:&wand Southwest Corp. •
... Www thswwl. i„. th-es i 0‘....... FM HIGHWAY 1709(SOUTHLAKE BLVD.).,16,6)Thm.r.k..1 0..150
14 21 ow...ow. I I NOW. DOI
.. • - ...At•AvitAA,At...corn cunt e.turren.ser-er wort s .... "' 0•11.Tear 732.11
.. ' e.......tar ,e,,, , 14 11 Ay oto•P 972.250000S Fax 972.2301950 •' 1 74..
• . • - _.......
._ .... . ,.1.!!.!1 IA 1{17T C.NII I IIIIM Y.,NIS NO 686
o o ...--••••••••••._11,1L•a a.• a -1 P.1 Err 0 0 0
0 0 0 . •• '
ADA1111ARY CHART•IN ARIOR LAPOPECAPA nulara• UV. .V.,,,A , , g, ,4,4
HIRAM 1111 AUDI PRY SUR VI Y,ARS NO 581 tri 9-Z Ilter Olin
. •
..,.co w ts.wpsaaws TA 000 b. C 100 P.A00 Tov0 10. 00•ALICAM Ow.. ..A.• a 4 r: 44.• lo , lk, .... APPLICANT:-. I r. Walled. tv,
AA.. Dv 1.1 ••••••••• ,
--
Of r.0%.*PP na•swa• an• gs..--d-o r• ' " le/A ITN soiriiii.xxii OAKS.1.70. 4 i.,1......„,
v.,..... tr,nu - --Wv •---- t• Wirt c9f 11.110•Ao trot 10 P0001 POI I a 0.1101101 SI
bel4111.41 MOB
._ -. 1..• 0,44 LP• A IT A A - 1 00010 01 I...I Me NV 40111 OM,FAIAP i,IPA.•••••1•••"A.m., 14 Neel INAnd••••••• 1....••• 1„,./11A,as818•1111•11...AM p.., s,tr. Ns , I• /An ••• •.••••••• •Ii.• ,,••••.- .• p p/ A.
16/11•111•11.PRE A a•SO.110 .t.. II: 'MI'- /
it/V•11.0 OM.IA
troisw.,in./l1.1A
••••••.pap,••••,••• •*,..,...,,,,,,::::Of.,,,....1"d r:4.,1/••••••••
...,Ail (11 II XA`. 1111W /-210 MINI 11x 11112.1111•30 I I I I
• 1
I
___
.p
12,0 -"A",*--•••••••-•.".
1 *IAA,ALL...•p.0.040.0.0..AA 1001.0 0.16•011.0 00...00 A 0 M.An. ..•
•••••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••......*•••••Av•P•••A•AV1R•u•1,A.1 .1)..‘,.'11/, ..•,.,I. I
pv.• RAP,
I%:/•;:41"ra I'.4•17•••••r..•.....*••••• •'"".••• ; TN .
FrlYJUN 00
:;10.1.P Tnyt-1.7.2.:1::41 21 rr,icArs.,....."17-____2mit_r.!..J I
I
v•H wipe)iv ...,1
•,1 11 01 11 K. ary Site Ikvelopmcill Ilan ; ',IAN 01 11 AN. CASE MA:ZA.910.51
• 110 III INC Al /N VUI /695 PG 1.166
018 Prel. .
WAIN: 1 to:4r s-LA-I.-11-4---.1-1* : Row in DICAIION
trrrilthis'4 a;rraiTO 1 •
Amy 14AT
•- ,..(lf/IX 0 C•% 110C Al C1:1 1 AIIR CO/AMII nriN ..........
tonsil C).Or Ai lif IPA (.....A110. A 101
n____
11111 4110 411111. • .
•
iki
rlli'i' 0' Q Q Q Q Q -
I !1 I 1 I I
• i,;i
I A- ,_ ;-H__ ( __ 1 Il i f l ; '—i:^.
t11[1 N
_l ,1
I I I I 1 ••• 1 1 S (ll RIQ WEST ELEVATION ! .,.. ! •-- i t
SCALE 1/16•.ISO. 03 SOUTH ELEVATION q k
O Q SCALP.:V16 I'-0-
A ^`M�VI rt`,
O t J
O I
- N O
I Q O Q
111 ! ,'�I��111, -/-- ant.snot.cos _ b
\\ ��r1 _ d1111�,�11�1�1�11�I{{XRa ow;.• .s va • Mu sao[.ats.
{ ®®1.1®1111.®® 11..rev `1 • ,•- '
�::: Car", .%.awn tI �I�I�® �+, 4. 1 I ' r• I �'11'.`''° I
O
■ Jf k nc 7i 1 ins o A 1 O
11
11T4•• r..W oe• OW ',woo, M1.0.1 Oche 1 110,10..10.001.
far.PILL Y,r1o. i11 1 .J
>o-0. Ire. ,000. ».J , rnz ant.11?
.....s l..p • re .• I. 1— .arc.xKw• 1� 1
�r EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 6�tT,;:Iw 1... Cr)
•....e.e• Iaar.I.,..ri.% " 0/ SCALP' I/16'.I'JY �� SCALE 1/16'.1'0' V v..:..,..1.;-
Ie..iM. fe . .1 r% r.. a .lra I{ ? /T,
0100
•C 'C \YZ/
Yes
•
M6..ua Mr 1 1 11% Ye 1 1 •x r..
Mr.1..p. II r1 •% Ye II 11 .% r.. +
.4M.em1, IMAM- 1 1 ! 1 11
,:�....._ r. �...d a Io anla..e.11.ele.eaw• l o<a`_.rP
0
,� 11.s+w n...e. w�ri .....1 i .no,s.'.�'%:giii °C.si 'ri:rn i i I Architects
R•. Ir• Rr r mrt..[or
fM,..N .IIH n b .I 11: V.. 1 1 1 1 _ _.1__-K 51�•uC11w•1R Jar 4Xwk1./Hen,Ir.
.nk.nr. 1 1 11% .l •
es 1 •% Y.
Mw......•. 1 II O. Y. I1 11 .% Y. ; __-,�0' IR—.—'1Y i 1 i y.i' llb Meek.Neal
_.n..n.P r0r1 D1.ri 1 1 a,rIgo lot racM
I.1.1..w•, w.. wM%- >• i' / f1d..Irr17fUl
IVI.rI..eYr veY.Nwk.•.. 1 1 1 1 I rP 75(1I4)I71.IfnJ6Y7
1•Ve.1 1..W DW OW 11=..Ytl nw14• R. RVl 1 1 MIN- n��' I 1 1 _-a SR._
/r 1 r.,:.... fan 17uNu.naf
11...M.y. M 1) -OD Y. M •I .l1% .. 1 M. \I (^� ©t I'--1 a%r vR nmulc.
fN..n4.0001 1 1 II% Yn l 1 e1t Y.. -- >I G•C.'IIaN.:.re ©®!L I© ILE11r-� -Al
M..w.e1% . II GM Y. II 11 .1t ♦n I 1 E3l;:l i oijEe,pLi I iltyv r..
`nlor rr,vsl ........ i �- I.r:2 o.Y. I r•i snr .,
!11_— I Q/\ ;
.._Ca111Y A0i1r , - fwdoS,Ps r•I�� _—_-�
na
°C.nsrtn —
—
n.� i .__ _.. _.... I i anD1 sae.,c - �---
-- - - r y a,
• "" ( �— i —�,ym TH11111ilnn 1 'I sI�11� ' •
n r..•ii-..nm•c I .II II 1 �i7E3 1 1- __ -owwlol xaeall.Dlaor ! EIL''� •4%'7 i _ -ro.1�1 E SX.4 rEl
rn a Mm t�-1(�'{ i III�IIF __ _ -..--.scar rnc.1.In — i - _ Ir en noa.1 1 .n. r o
I_ II IL L u 1L I i ! 1,r.-r' O %ull cot larMrl^aslu 007
I II II l h11-aG. iniTrjw
1 ]f- __1 •1 !i. •r •. 1;'� ,1 k: k ,—_1 ..,— I �t 1 II .s_ I .,..y t { 1 #1.l .- •i . ,C. L _,� 1 �C_ �i:diANliullIIIoiiu I !t ' I i ulii"� P
• QI linlargcd lilcvntion I 1 I REC'D J U N 00 is CASE NO:Z1.97-0JG
SCAM1N'.1'-0' ,
Pm*AfwAe
/14O I
MAY-13-1397 15:575 F t EL:(`G.tTT & TA"1 e t / P.e3/ti?
110 ORDINANCE NO. (D 10
AN ORDINANCE OF I tin, CITY OF SO UTB AKE, TEXAS, ANNEXING
THE HEREINAFTER MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED TERRITORY
GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS AN AREA COMPRISING
APPROXIMATELY 480 ACRES ABL'i"ITL"G STATE HIGHWAY 114,
KNOWN AS"SOLANA",AND AN AREA CO RISLNG APPROXLMATELY
27 ACRES ABUTTING THAT PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF SOUTHIAKE,
TEXAS, AND EXTE'YDLNG I-HE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF SAID CITY SO
AS TO INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WI t RUIN SAID CITY LIMITS AND
GRATING TO ALL OWNERS OF PROPERLY ALL OF 1 HE RIGHT'S
AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS AND BLNDL G SAID OWNERS
AND OTHER PERSONS WITHIN THE ANNEXED AREA BY ALL THE
ACTS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY; APPROVING
A SERVICE PLAN FOR SUCH TERRITORY; PROVIDING A
S1EVERABILiI1Y C AUSEE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN l.IY iCr"i Z DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
• WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to annex the hereinafter described territory
(the 'Territory"); and
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has received a petition signed by all owners of the
Territory requesting that the city annex the Territory; and
W I3YRFAS, public hearings on the proposed annexation were held before the
Southlake City Council on May 26, 1997 and May 27, 1997, not more than forty (40) days
nor less than twenty (20) days before the adoption of this ordinance on Srst reading; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings were published in a newspaper having
general circulation in the City of Southlake and in the Territory on May 14, 1997, which date
is not more than twenty (20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the public
hearings: and
FA - 1
' r Y-19--199'7 15:55 =iELC("G.B ET 1 TA't P 8173324741 P.04/8'7
•
IIIWHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, has prepared a service plan, setting forth
municipal ser/ices and a schedule for extending services to the property herein annexed; and
WHEREAS, the ne`..ly annexed Territory lies within the exclusive extraterr torial
jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Texas.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDALNTEA BY 1"HE CITY COCNCTL OF THE CITY
OF SOLTH1.AE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That the Territory generally described as follows:
Parcel A - Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B.
Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107,
the C.P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No.
1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tarrant County, Texas
and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No.
I to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79,
0 Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots
1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the
Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat
Records of Tarrant County, Texas; and
Parcel B - Being a acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey,
Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County. Texas, the same being Abstract
Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number
724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, Denton
County,Texas; the W.Medlin Survey,Abstract Number 1958,Tarrant County,
Texas and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County,
Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County,
Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to
International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM,
as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume:
7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume
7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, and also being a portion of those
tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page
1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records,
Tarrant County, Texas; and
IIIf:\dles`,slake\ordinance N,annex.002(05.19-97; Page 2
' hiiY-13-1947 16:56 F I ELD I 1^-C.BAFFET & TP`r1_72 81 1 t c 4?41 P.@5/E7
S Parcel C - Being all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey,
Abstract 1958, and the C.M Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant
County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to
International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as LBM, and recorded
in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; and
Parcel D -BELNG a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY,ABSTRACT
NO. 1107 and the CM. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the
JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015 and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY,
ABS I-RACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas
and more particularly described in Exhibit"A" and depicted in Fxhibit "B", be, and the same
is hereby, annexed to the City of Southlake, Texas, and the boundary limits of the City of
Southlake be, and the same are hereby, extended to include the so described Territory
within the City limits, and the same hereafter shall be included within the territorial limits
of said City, and the owners and other persons within the Territory thereof hereafter shall
• be entitled to all rights and privileges of other citizens of the City and shall be bound by all
the acts, ordinances and regulations of said City.
SECTION 2.
That the approved Service Plan is hereby approved by the city council and adopted,
and is attached hereto as Exhibit "C' and is made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 3.
The official map and boundaries of the city, heretofore adopted, arc hereby amended
so as to include the aforementioned Territory as a part of the City of Southlake, Texas. The
city manager is hereby directed and authorized to perform or cause to be performed ail acts
necessary to correct the official map of the city to add the Territory hereby annexed as
required by law.
40
t,,G1es,,s:sze\orainarcr\30.ncao7.(0'-19-97) Page
t Y-19-1997 16:56 F I Q.D I Ki.BARRED' S TAYLCR 8173324741 P.06/e7
0 SECTION 4.
The city secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance in the
office of the county clerk of Denton and Tarrant Counties, Texas.
SECTION S.
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with
the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such
ordinances are hereby repealed; provided however the passage of this ordinance shall not
repeal or effect the validity of Ordinance No. 7 7Co .
SECTION 6.
If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance be found to be
*legal, invalid or unconstitutional, or if any portion of said property is incapable of being
annexed by the city, for any reason whatsoever, the adjudication shall not affect any other
section, sentence, phrase, word, paragraph or provision of this ordinance or the application
of any other section, sentence, phrase, word, paragraph, or provision of any other ordinance
of the city. The city council declares that it would have adopted the valid portion and
applications of this ordinance and would have annexed, and does hereby annex, the valid
property without the invalid part, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be severable.
SECTION 7.
The annexation described herein shall be effective immediately upon passage after
second reading.
ilf:Valcs\slake\ordinance`,anr 007, (05•19.97) Pate 4
. MAY-19-1997 16:56 FI8_DIPG.8ARRET & TAYLCR 8173324741 P.07' 7
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READL'YG ON THIS DAY OF
S
, 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVE]) ON SECOND READL'IG ON THIS DAY OF
, 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SCITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
• E\Gles\sLskc\ordi.nance\annex. (OS•19.97) Pxge 5
TOTAL P.07
EXHIBIT
SLAND DESCRIPTION FOR THE PORTION OF SOLANA
FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
Being all that property. commonly known as Solana and more particularly described as Parcels
"A". "B" and "C" as follows:
Parcel "A"
Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134,
the T.W. Mann Survey. Abstract No. 1107. the U.P. Martin Survey. Abstract 1015. the W.
Medlin Survey. Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510. Tarrant
County, Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1
to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, Map & Plat Records
of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the
Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A,
Slide No. 283. Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas.
PARCEL B„ Aficl 23�•a ZI ) leis ‘tw+� ll`� *;s�k' 4-w� uk.+cranca o.�6.4'c.veidtr., #.3 ire-1 4001 i bCL
Being alacre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant
County, Texas. the same being Abstract Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry
•D
Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528,
enton County, Texas; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 1958, Tarrant County, Texas
and the C. M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County, Texas, all located in
northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of
those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080: Volume
7351. Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171;
Volume 7940. Page 167, and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to
IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page
1765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described by metes
and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod in the southerly right-of-way of State Highway No.
114 (variable width), being the most northerly northwestern corner of said tract of land recorded
in Volume 7376, Page 1728, said Deed Records, and the northeast corner of that certain tract of
land conveyed to R. Chandler as recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records. Denton
County. Texas:
THENCE along the southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway 113, the following
courses and distances:
S 71' 03'21" E. 3458.57 feet for the beginning of a curve to the right:
IIIAlong said curve an arc distance of 888.33 feet, through a central angle of 27' 21' 59",
having a radius of 1859.86 feet, and a long chord of S 57° 22' 21" E, 879.91 feet;
l:`PROroi99990t'OCIvEST2157LEG.DES Page 1 of0
•
• S 25° 37' 35" W, 108.86 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right;
Along said non-tangent curve and arc distance of 196.55 feet, through a central angle of
06' 15' 25' , having a radius of 1799.86 feet, and a long chord of S 39° 40' 08" E, 196.46
feet to a concrete Texas Highway Department monument;
S 36° 32' 25" E. 215.14 feet;
THENCE leaving said right-of-way, West, 2141.45 feet;
THENCE S 52° 00' 00" W, 1000.00 feet;
THENCE South, 1882.23 feet to the north line of that certain tract of land conveyed to
Howard Dudley et ux as recorded in Volume 4888, Page 622, said Deed Records;
THENCE N 89° 57' 44" W, 200.93 feet to the northwest corner of said Dudley tract, also
being in the south line of said IBM tract as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1765;
THENCE N 00° 20' 49" E, 45.01 feet;
THENCE N 89° 39' 10" W, along the north line of Roanoke Dove Road (variable width),
• 1346.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right;
THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a variable width
right-of-way the following courses and distances:
Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 241.85 feet, through a central angle of 89°
45' 10", having a radius of 154.38 feet, and a long chord of N 44° 46' 35" W, 217.86
feet,
• N 00° 06' 00" E, 977.90 feet,
N 00° 08' 31" W, 394.37 feet,
N 00° 10' 13" W, 551.67 feet,
N 02° 20' 32" E, 554.17 feet,
N 28° 49' 02" E, 164.88 feet,
N 23° 30' 55" E, 98.16 feet,
N 12° 46' 54" E, 100.00 feet,
• N
00° 16' 18" W, 993.50 feet to the southwest corner of the aforementioned R. Chandler
tract;
I^PROf01999901'OCIEVEST'2157LEG.DES Page 2 of ip
gA -7
•
• THENCE N 89° 47' 00" E along the southerly line of said R. Chandler tract, 258.02 feet,
THENCE N 00° 30' 28" W along the easterly line of said R. Chandler tract, 505.33 feet
to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 232.921 acres of land more or less, save and
except approximately 20 acres dedicated to the State of Texas for State Highway No. 114 right-
of-way.
PARCEL "C"
Being, all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M. Throop
Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts
described in deeds to International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and
recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 (also known
as West T.W. King Road), a variable width roadway, said point also being on the northeasterly
right-of-way of S.H. 114, a variable width roadway;
Thence along the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114, N 36° 32' 30" W, 587.00 feet;
Thence leaving the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114 as follows:
N 53° 29' 00" E, 546.74 feet,
S 03° 07' 00" W, 344.50 feet to a point in the centerline of County Road 3088,
N 89° 28' 00" W, 25.00 feet to the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088, said right-
of-way also being the westerly limits of the City of Southlake,
Thence along the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 and the westerly limits
of the City of Southlake, S 00° 33' 00" W, 514.80 feet,
Thence S 72° 03' 00" W, 47.70 feet to the Point Of Beginning and containing 3.9419
acres, more or less, save and except any right-of-way dedications to the State of Texas for State
Highway No. 114.
PARCEL "D"
BEING a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the C.M.
THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MAR FIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015, and the W. MEDLIN
SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described
as follows:
• BEGINNING at the northwest corner of the J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134,
Tarrant County, Texas, a lit inch iron rod in the northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway
No. 114 (a 220 foot wide right-of-way);
['PROT01999901'OCIEVEST_'157LEG.DES Page 3 of to
.THENCE along the said northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114 N 36° 32' 00" W,
continuing along a projection of said R.O.W. to a point for a corner in the centerline of County
Road #3088 (Sam School Road), said point being in the common boundary line between
Westlake and Southlake and described in the City of Westlake Ordinance #81;
THENCE South with the projected center line of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road)
(Peytonville Road) to a point for a corner in the southwest R.O.W. line of S.H. 114;
THENCE Southeast along the southwest R.O.W. of S.H. 114 a distance of approximately
2,796.55 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the southeast corner of a tract by deed to
I.B.M. recorded in V. 7422 P. 2157, DRTCT as described in ordinance #447 city limits of the
City of Westlake, said point also being the southeast corner of Lot 1R, Block 2 of the
Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-
214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE N 88° 29' 50" W along the south line of said I.B.M. tract 907.75 feet to a point for
a corner, said corner being the N.E. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M V. 7824 P. 2033 DRTCT;
THENCE S 00° 17' 58" W along the east line of said I.B.M. tract a distance of 197.59 feet to
an iron pin in its S.E. corner;
OTHENCE S 86° 22' 05" W a distance of 518.25 feet to the S.W. corner of said I.B.M. tract;
THENCE N 19° 09' 01„ W along the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road a distance of 393.02 feet
to an iron pin being the S.W. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M. V. 7376 P. 1779 DRTCT and
being. in the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road (County Road 43088);
THENCE S 88° 45' 45" W approximately 51 feet crossing Sam School Road (County Road No.
3088) to a point in the westerly right-of-way of Sam School Road;
THENCE S 19° 09' 01" E, approximately 500 feet along the westerly right-of-way of Sam
School Road to a galvanized iron pipe by a corner of a fence in the west line of Sam School
Road;
THENCE in a southeasterly direction crossing County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) to a point
for a corner, said point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 and the northwest corner of Lot 6
of the R.P. Estes Subdivision as recorded in Vol. 1957, P. 324, DRTCT;
THENCE easterly along, the common south line of Lot 7 and north line of Lot 6 by deed a
distance of 1349 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of the T. Mann Survey, said line also
being the city limits of the City of Southlake;
THENCE in a northerly direction along. the east line of the T. Mann Survey and the west line
S
of the J. Martin Survey A-1134 to a point for a corner, said point being by deed South 910.51
feet from the northwest corner of the J. Martin Survey and being the southwest corner of the tract
of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #319;
[:'PROf01999901'OC[EVEST2I57LEG.DES Page 4 of k
HENCE N 89° 27' 49" E to a point for a corner in the southwesterly R.O.W. of State Highway
14
THENCE northeasterly at a right angle to S.H. 114 centerline, crossing S.H. 114 to a point for
a corner in its northeasterly R.O.W., said point being in the southwest line of a tract of lane
annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #126;
THENCE northwesterly along the northeasterly R.O.W. of S.H. 114 and said Ordinance #126
tract to the POINT OF BEG[NNI G and containing 27 acres of land, more or less.
EXCLI✓SIONS FROM ANNEXATION
Save and except those portions of said Parcels "A" and "B" more particularly described as Strips
No. 1 and No. 2 as follows:
STRIP NO. 1
Being a portion of said Parcel "B" as described above, said portion being a strip of land 50 feet
wide, the westerly line of said 50 foot strip described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said tract of land described by deed recorded in
Volume 7376, Page 1728, said northwest corner also being the southwest corner of the R.
handler tract described by deed recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records of Denton
county, Texas. Said corner also being in the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road.
Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road approximately
1250 feet to a point approximately 50 feet south of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way
of Precinct Line Road and the north line of the Scott Bradley Tract as described by deed recorded
in Volume 6395, Page 67, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 50 foot strip containing
1.4 acres, more or less.
•
STRIP NO. 2
Being a portion of Parcels "A" and "B" as described above, also being a strip of land 50 feet
wide the southerly line of said strip described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of the Alvin F. Olen Jr. tract described by deed as
recorded in Volume 4181, Page 644, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said corner also
being in the south line of Lot 1, Block 3 of the WestlakeiSouthlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the
Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant
County, Texas;
Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 1466.76 feet
to a point in the east line of the Howard Dudley tract described by deed as recorded in Volume
888. Page 622, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas;
Thence northerly along the east line of said Dudley tract, said line also being the westerly
[.'PROD`0(999901',oC1EVEST21 MEG.DES Page 5 of 6
g/q-/D
•
Oline of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 460.91 feet to a point in the northeast corner of said
Dudley tract, said corner also being in the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3;
Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3, said line also being the north
line of said Dudley tract, approximately 1774.98 feet to the southwestern corner of said Lot 1,
Block 3, said corner also being in the north line of said Dudley tract;
Thence generally westerly along the north line of said Dudley tract, said line also being
the south line of Parcel "B" as described above, approximately 100.93 feet;
Thence generally northerly leaving the north line of said Dudley tract approximately 95
feet,
Thence generally westerly, parallel to the north right-of-way of Dove Road (a variable
width roadway), approximately 1396.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right,
Thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 241.85 feet, having a central angle of
89° 45' 10", a radius of 154.38 feet and whose long chord bears N 44 46' 35" W,
Thence generally northerly, parallel to the east right-of-way of Precinct Line Road
approximately 50 feet,
Thence generally westerly approximately 50 feet to a point in the east right-of-way of
OP recinct Line Road;
THENCE generally northerly approximately 600 feet along the east right-of-way of Precinct Line
Road to a point approximately 50 feet north of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of
Precinct Line Road and the northerly line of the Hillwood/1088 tract as described by deed as
recorded in Volume 12260, Page 1948, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 50 foot strip
containing approximately 7.1 acres, more or less.
S
I:\PROM 1999901`OC[EVEST2I57LEG.DES Page 6 of 6
'i2-/1
% % 1 .1,., I,1 I li:Ifit:71 1 i ./
(I . ...--- .1. I. i //
I SSIVIX Y_-I I iF
•
, ----\-- . . I . . .... .
,' u .0.i w I tr'
\ •• ' - SY)(31'3fK1H1f10S
\ _ �1 - Y�4
\i. \,, 1 JJSIHX3 NOLLI/X3NNV VNVIOS
:r _ \ t\
• �. I `S•— j\. a'ONdins—\ 1�\1 MOW - I
\ I
.� 1
ill,''. ..''''‘ \„cc76s„.- -- f),
,\ II ' .-.. \ •, '.d.., ,.,..0,,•' '' 0 (
•
1 ; ' r __ l�J 1 1,4 .l .. !se w.,,, ..'—•�—
ell
\ •\ \ ''' \\ . .4...• • . , ) :' • • •- •-•... ...7_111k,
. \ ' ., ,::,' ' .. ' ii ' .
``�
St
i .Y.l33YMd uI/
-, :\ \ I
'il (. __ _, ......
)111C ' ----I Ay...l7i, \ i \
"1" 1. '• —I ill 1 . %'' \ '\
\ 1
' \ . AL 133611M\
f, N. ,.' I k..s...„'".111(,,, ,,,..,,,,,/,..,...,.,,. _,.•
, ..._„,
, 4' '".
I tea- . w � ._
__, .. 1:-.."-_-_%. , .. ... :.',.\ I i..) \'
1
'1- . , -� - J
i i
i
If
,I t•oN eltlls
!
' 2Q0,L ��_,-
r • -,O�
EXHIBIT tt&u
S
SERVICE PLAN
Municipal services to the following area known as the Solana Project and generally
described as:
Parcel A - Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B.
Martin Survey. Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107,
the U.P. Martin Survey. Abstract 1015. the W. Medlin Survey. Abstract No.
1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tarrant County, Texas
and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No.
1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79,
Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots
1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the
Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat
Records of Tarrant County, Texas.
Parcel B - Being a acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey,
Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract
Number 1045. Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number
724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, Denton
County, Texas; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 1958,Tarrant County,
• Texas and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County,
Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County,
Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to
International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM,
as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume
7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume
7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, and also being a portion of those
tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page
1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records,
Tarrant County, Texas.
Parcel C - Being all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey,
Abstract 1958, and the C.M Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant
County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to
International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and recorded
in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas.
Parcel D - BEING a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 1107 and the C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the
JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN
• SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015 and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County. Texas.
f:\files\slake\annexati\service.001 Page 1
Q�4 -/3
0 shall be furnished after the effective date of annexation by or on behalf of the City of
Southlake. Texas, at the following levels and in accordance with the following schedule:
1. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of annexation the City of Southlake will
provide the following services to the newly annexed area:
A. Police Protection
The City of Southlake. Texas. and its Police Department will provide police
protection to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now being
provided to the areas of the City of Southlake. Texas, with similar topography, land use and
population within the newly annexed area.
B. Fire Protection and Ambulance Service
The City of Southlake. Texas, and its Fire Department will provide fire protection
and ambulance service to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now
being provided to other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas. with similar topography, land
use and population within the City. Further, the City of Southlake Fire Department and
ambulance service will respond to all dispatched calls and requests for service or assistance
0 within the newly annexed area.
C. Solid Waste Collection
At the present time the City of Southlake, Texas, is using a designated, specific
contractor for collection of solid waste and refuse within the city limits of the City of
Southlake, Texas. Such contract for solid waste collection is with Laidlaw. Upon payment
of any required deposits and the agreement to pay lawful service fees and charges, solid
waste collection will be provided to citizens in the newly annexed area to the extent that the
City's contractor has access to the area to be serviced.
D. Maintenance of Water and Waste Water Facilities
Any and all water or waste facilities owned or maintained by the City of Southlake,
Texas, at the time of the annexation shall continue to be maintained by the City of
Southlake. Texas. Any and all water or waste water facilities which may be acquired
subsequent to the annexation of the proposed area shall be maintained by the City of
Southlake, Texas, to the extent of its ownership. It is the intent of the City of Southlake to
maintain all water and waste water facilities in the annexed area that are not within the
service area with any other water or waste water utility.
IIIE. Maintenance of Roads and Streets
f:\files\slake\annexati\service.W1 Page 2
09-1V
SAny and all roads, streets or alleyways which have been dedicated to the City of
Southlake, Texas, or which are owned by the City of Southlake, Texas, shall be maintained
to the same degree and extent that other roads, streets, and all alleyways are maintained in
areas with similar topography, land use and population density. Any and all lighting of
roads, streets and alleyways which may be positioned in a right-of-way, roadway or utility
company easement shall be maintained by the applicable utility company servicing the City
of Southlake, Texas, pursuant to the rules, regulations and fees of such utility.
F. Maintenance of Parks, Playgrounds and Swimming Pools
The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, is not aware of the existence of any
parks, playgrounds or public swimming pools now located in the area proposed for
annexation. In the event any such parks, playgrounds or swimming pools do exist and are
public facilities, the City of Southlake, Texas, will maintain such areas to the same extent and
degree that it maintains parks, playgrounds and swimming pools and other similar areas of
the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas.
G. Maintenance of any Publicly Owned Facility, Building or Municipal Service
The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, is not aware of the existence of any
0 publicly owned facility, building or other municipal service now located in the area proposed
for annexation. In the event any such publicly owned facility, building or municipal service
does exist and is a public facility, the City of Southlake, Texas, will maintain such area to the
same extent and degree that it maintain publicly owned facilities, buildings or municipal
services of the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas.
2. Program for construction or acquisition of any capital improvements necessary for
providing municipal services for the area:
A. In General
1. The City will initiate the construction or acquisition of any capital
improvements required by this service plan within two years after the effective date of the
annexation and will substantially complete the work within 4-1/2 years.
2. The City policy for extending water and waste water service is to extend
service on an as required basis when development applications or subdivision plats are
submitted to the City in accordance with the City's subdivision and development ordinances.
3. Landowners may be required to fund capital improvements necessary
to provide service in a manner consistent with Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code.
SNothing in this service plan shall be interpreted to require a landowner within the newly
annexed area to fund capital improvements necessary to provide municipal services in a
f:\files\slake\anne ati\sevice.001 Page 3
c, -5_
Smanner inconsistent with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, unless otherwise
agreed to by the landowner.
4. This Service Plan shall have no effect on the Trophy Club Municipal
Utility District No. 1.
B. Police Protection, Fire Protection & Solid Waste Collection
The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, finds and determines it to be
unnecessary to acquire or construct any capital improvements for the purposes of providing
police protection, fire protection or solid waste collection. The City Council finds and
determines that it has at the present time adequate facilities to provide the same type, kind
and level of protection and service which is presently being administered to other areas
already incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas, with the same or similar topography,
land use and population density.
C. Water and Waste Water Facilities
The City of Southlake, Texas, believes that given the current state of development
in the area to be annexed, adequate City water mains exist for points of connection for
0 serviceable extensions to provide water service pursuant to the City's standard water
extension policies now in existence or as may be amended by the City Council. If further
development and construction of subdivisions commence within this property, water mains
and waste water facilities of the City will be extended by the property owner or developer
in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable policies,
ordinances, and regulations. City participation in the costs of these extensions shall be in
accordance with applicable City policies, ordinances, and regulations. Such extensions will
commence within two years from the effective date of the annexation ordinance, and/or
upon development, whichever occurs later.
D. Roads and Streets
The City of Southlake, Texas, with a cooperative effort of the City's designated utility
company, will undertake to provide the same degree of road and street lighting as is
provided in areas of similar topography, land use and population density within the present
corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. Maintenance of properly dedicated roads
and streets will be consistent with the maintenance provided by the City to other roads and
streets in areas of similar topography, land use and subdevelopment of the annexed
property. Developers will be required pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, to provide internal and peripheral streets and to construct those streets in accordance
with the specifications required by the City of Southlake. Texas, for a properly dedicated
Sstreet.
f:\tiles\slake\annexati\service.W 1 Page 4
'A -/6
SE. Maintenance of Parks, Playgrounds, and Swimming Pools, and the
Maintenance of any Other Publicly Owned Facility, Building or Service
To the extent that it becomes necessary because of development demands, population
growth, and a bona fide need, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, will
undertake to provide any such facility which it deems necessary to adequately provide for
the health and safety of the citizens of the newly incorporated area based upon the standard
considerations of topography, land use and population density.
SPECIFIC FINDINGS
The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas finds and determines that this
proposed Service Plan will not provide any fewer services, and it will not provide a lower
level of service in the area proposed to be annexed than were in existence in the proposed
area at the time immediately preceding the annexation process.
Because of the differing characteristics of topography, land utilization and population
density, the service levels which may ultimately be provided in the newly annexed area may
differ somewhat from services provided other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas. These
differences are specifically dictated because of differing characteristics of the property and
• the City of Southlake, Texas, will undertake to perform consistent with this contract so as
to provide this newly annexed area with the same type, kind and quality of service presently
enjoyed by the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who reside in areas of similar
topography. land utilization and population.
APPROVED on this the A/ day of Wtit , 1997.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
�scF SOVTy�,
,�-� &%00---'"2_.__.
9' Rick St cey, Mayor
•
ATTEST: f~
44
)944444t 11 I . ,
Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary
•
f:\tiles\slake\annexati\sewice.001 Page 5
4. City of Southlake,Texas
MEMORANDUM
• June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 679, ls` Reading, Street Name Change from South
Kimball Ave. to Crooked Lane Blvd. for the portion of South
Kimball Ave. from the Intersection of South Kimball Ave. and
Crooked Lane Blvd. to East Continental Blvd. and a Street Name
Change for East Continental Blvd. to South Kimball Ave. in
Heritage Industrial Park
BACKGROUND
The Thoroughfare Plan adopted by the City Council on March 4, 1997, proposes new
construction of S. Kimball Ave. through Green Meadow to S.H. 26. This requires that
the current portion of S. Kimball Ave., fronting Greenlee Business Park, be renamed in
• anticipation of possible development in Green Meadow and construction of a new
section of S. Kimball Ave.
A portion of E. Continental has been constructed within Heritage Industrial Park. This
section will eventually become part of S. Kimball Ave., according to the Thoroughfare
Plan. It is important that this portion be renamed prior to Certificates of Occupancy
being issued to property owners.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the portion of S. Kimball Ave. west of Crooked Lane and north
of E. Continental Blvd. be renamed to Crooked Lane Blvd. and the portion of E.
Continental located in the Heritage Industrial Park be renamed to S. Kimball Ave
(Exhibit "A"). Staff also recommends the first reading of the ordinance officially
changing these names be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for
City Council consideration.
BW/cre
Attachments: Memo from Paul Ward, Chief Building Inspector
Ordinance No. 679
Exhibit "A"
8B-1
City of Southlake,Texas
• MEMORANDUM
June 2, 1997
TO: Robert Whitehead, Public Works Director
FROM: Paul Ward, Chief Building Official
SUBJECT: Street Name Change
The Thoroughfare Plan adopted March 4, 1997 by The City Council proposes to extend South
Kimball Avenue and East Continental as shown on the attached map.
A piece of East Continental has been constructed in the Heritage Industrial Park. This needs to
be renamed soon because the building is under construction and the Certificate of Occupancy
should be issued at a South Kimball address.
Also the portion of South Kimball adjacent to Greenlee Business Park and Cambridge Place East
needs to be re-named in order to avoid address conflicts. It seems that it is and extension of
S Crooked Lane Blvd. And that would be the logical name choice.
The known occupied properties affected are:
768 S. Kimball Ave. Pumpco
900 S. Kimball Ave. Texas School of Baseball
1000 S. Kimball Ave. Beech Overhead Door Co.
l. \ .\,,` y
PW/jb
RECEIVED
jUN 3 31991
DPI OF PUBUC WORKS
86-2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
• ORDINANCE NO. 679
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAMES OF
PORTIONS OF STREETS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY
PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE" WEST
OF CROOKED LANE BLVD. AND NORTH OF EAST
CONTINENTAL AVENUE TO "CROOKED LANE BLVD.",
FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; AND THE STREET
PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "EAST CONTINENTAL
BOULEVARD", LOCATED IN THE HERITAGE INDUSTRIAL
PARK, TO "SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE", FURTHER
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF
INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES.
WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City of
Southlake, Texas (the "City"), presently known as "South Kimball Avenue", located
West of Crooked Lane Blvd. and North of E. Continental Blvd., to "Crooked Lane
Blvd." has been requested by the City of Southlake; and
WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City presently
• known as "E. Continental Blvd.", located in the area known as Heritage Industrial
Park, to "S. Kimball Ave." has been requested by the City of Southlake; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change
the name of such streets as requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE:
Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and
are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety.
Section 2. That the name of the portion of the street located within the City
presently known as "S. Kimball Ave." west of Crooked Lane Blvd. and north of E.
Continental Blvd. as described in Exhibit "A", is hereby officially changed to
"Crooked Lane Blvd.".
Section 3. That the name of the portion of the street located with the City
presently known as "E. Continental Blvd." in the Heritage Industrial Park as described
in Exhibit "A". is hereby officially changed to "S. Kimball Avenue".
• Section 4. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word
in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or
8B-3
unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
• validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby
declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such
invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with
the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the
inconsistency or conflict.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY
OF , 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
S
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS
DAY OF , 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
S
8B-4
pro osedStYeet e
t
$0•0110. , -
• . A■■■■1111r•Al
111110-- priterni 01,.. ammo f VA,
41 ,,ION 4111.1Fipie.' " h"
lhh6:411t7.1111 iiip
ST PKWY EAST ■.
.11111
1111 Irk
vim`me ,.ttIkl. Fostbg !R�9MBO
i
p,�ttroay . : ,�
et
F!Ø
T.■Emil,.t A,
lilliellIMI
mumnimmwaill 4
II ill
aggilli
111/*l!9'11Iit& I..�r
i ��i�i��/11111• :■■ � r
I11
r1r� ■ a ;: A ■- 11
It .
IIIII �' rifr,04 •
�!'!p
...iii. a 61:11
11
-"--711/4011111111111 -- I
I4tII11IiIIN ;g41-44
g ■ mi/ii1 lrigiileriBustEss
- ,
.y■lallial
�■ PAS r City of Grapevine
e
2 4
f ci.
Linn anavo opscp.
.......=_I
midi no-rwal
.&,......5..., ..r.,...1 nun
raw,Ireareasin •■:--_; 10" III Pr-
lin'—------- _ Scale MB 1":10000•
• .R
City of Southlake,Texas
MEMORANDUM
III June 13, 1997
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Shelli Siemer, Community Services Coordina�t
SUBJECT: A Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent School
District Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop
initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness
Attached you will find the changes to the Joint Resolution to create a Drug & Alcohol
Committee. These changes resulted from the discussion of the Drug & Alcohol Council at the
Joint City Council/CISD Board of Trustees meeting on June 10. The changes made to the Joint
Resolution are summarized as follows:
Changes to Section 1-
A. Changed the committee from two to three City Council and School Board members each to
allow more input from the City Council and School Board members.
B. Removed the Municipal Court Judge as a voting member of the Joint Committee. This will
allow the Judge to be a neutral participant in the committee. The role of Municipal Court
S
Judge may involve implementation and enforcement of some recommendations of this
committee.
Changes to Section 2-
C. Added one staff member from the CISD Superintendent's Office to the staff support section of
the resolution. The school district will have representation from both the teaching and
administrative staff.
D. Added the Municipal Court Administrator to the staff support section of the resolution.
Added a new Section as Section 3-
E. The School Board and City Council indicated a strong desire to receive representation from
various civic groups. Section 3 allows the committee to appoint representatives of various
civic groups as ex-officio (non-voting) members. The committee may appoint as many
representatives as necessary to obtain additional input from other youth organizations,
churches, social services agencies, and other community groups and organizations. These
representatives should be non-voting members to maintain a workable size for decision
making purposes. More importantly, recommendations from the committee may have
budgetary impact. A smaller committee able to consider school and city budget concerns is
important to the success of the community effort.
ID Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for June 17, 1997 for City Council
discussion.
\\ \
f `
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
• THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AND CARROLL
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF
TRUSTEES ESTABLISHING A JOINT COMMITTEE
COMPRISED OF MEMBERS FROM THE CITY,
SCHOOL, PARENTS, STUDENTS AND OTHER CIVIC
LEADERS TO DEVELOP INITIATIVES FOR DRUG
AND ALCOHOL AWARENESS FOR THE
COMMUNITY. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the citizens of Southlake are confronted with the societal issue of
drug and alcohol abuse among the youth of our community and desire to undertake a
mutual effort to address this situation; and
WHEREAS, City Council, Carroll ISD Board of Trustees, and the Southlake
Youth Action Commission (SYAC) have identified that problems of drug and alcohol
abuse exist in Southlake as in other communities, and that there is a need for better and
more effective drug and alcohol abuse prevention; and
WHEREAS, the best potential for developing new and effective initiatives to
combat this growing problem is to partner youth, parents, the schools and city officials,
• and other civic leaders working together; and
WHEREAS, the entire community of Southlake will benefit from these
initiatives; now:
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1: A committee shall be formed of members of the City, CISD and the
community to recommend initiatives and/or programs to the City of Southlake and the
CISD which will serve to reduce drug and alcohol abuse. The committee shall be
composed of:
(a) Three members of the City Council, appointed by the City Council
(b) Three members of the School Board, appointed by the School
Board.
(c) Two members of the community at large, appointed by the City
Council.
• (d) Two members of the community at large, appointed by the Carroll
ISD Board of Trustees.
�1
• (e) Two youth members appointed by the Southlake Youth Action
Commission.
Section 2: Staff support will be provided by the CISD staff and City staff and should as a
minimum consist of:
(a) One staff liaison from the City Manager's Office.
(b) One staff member from the Southlake Department of Public
Safety.
(c) One staff liaison from the CISD Superintendent's Office.
(d) One staff member or teacher from the CISD.
(e) The Municipal Court Administrator.
Section 3: Representatives from social services agencies, churches, and other community
groups and organizations shall be invited to actively participate in the work of the
committee. Such members shall be appointed as ex-officio members.
• Section 4: The Committee shall be tasked with recommending to the City Council and
CISD Board of Trustees, initiatives, programs, and/ or action plans, which will serve to
focus on the goal of reducing drug and alcohol abuse by the youth of Southlake.
Section 5: The committee shall serve for the period necessary to develop its
recommendations, but not longer than 12 months without further action by the City
Council and Carroll ISD Board of Trustees.
Section 6: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the
City Council and the CISD Board of Trustees.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
•
•
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
•
CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
By:
President, Board of Trustees
ATTEST:
Secretary, Board of Trustees
•
•
\\A - tA-
u
W
m
- ,
W W W
x x �
cn
m
m
m m
n m N
I O m
- O o
0
N -
Z
mc`-
m O m
W
O z m
m W -
N
m m
z z z
moo
--
���
�;;
99-
/ / /
0 0 0
LL LL
W W W
LL-m
W
m
m-
`S I
--
m N -
m m
I N
___
0 0 0
o - -
X LL J
m
a -,
J
J
,J J
, U
Z Q
u mo=
=a_
w
=amp
� H N 2 J
- - m J
0 0 - o m
-ff�
a a J z
� - �
;;7o<
o m m - s
o Im m -
i i i
LL J
O Q1 W m
U LL .
I I M
M " ..
LL VJ LI.
W W w L LL
- m � LL
, LL
Q R
N-
m
- ' b
�-
.-
m
m m m o
n m
m Q -
, -
.. .. .. m m
O O O „ LL
LL'
LL
...o
�-
O N W ,
m -
JC X m W d
yx_J-1
z �
- O
O �
Z J J
cn a a
o;
o
-1 J n
LL Zm
-
N 6 LL
Z N 2
- m z I ••
O fJ' - LL
om •o-
LLm�,�m
o No m
m N
- m - N
m In ..
m m o
i i i
z z z z �
0 0 o m m
¢ m ¢ ¢
���m
--a
m
��o
m m m m
0000.
0000
m
11 II 11 .. W
wLL w Z 0
W J J
LL LL m O LL
r TIMA_ RRQN PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
--\��------ - ___�`. \\ GQL F COURSE'`J� 1 i i ' /.
�_ �- :;;: -- ) \;.,. \'' �' �f / % BEING A 56.814 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY N 71^28'50' W A DISTANCE OF 21.33 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\ \��/'- �� `� \ ', CAB.`.A, SLIDE('7486 T /k ABSTRACT N0. 1037, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER•
�� < \ ` '' TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P. RECORDED IN '
- � \��� ( 1;'` ' I / / :,� VOLUME 12613, PAGE 9813 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N 46^46'10' W, A DISTANCE OF 38.46 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\\ ,{ZONED• R:UD 4$0-0-f0( , 1� 1 •/ ;�t \\ ; �� (D.R.T.C.T.). SAID 56.814 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
LITtJ:.M ©I� y- DENSITY, -RESI . �%1',` ' // \ �\ ,t �; METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
(EXISTING 5U' ROW) EAGLE BEND �, ." / - /' ._ •.
\ { �., r ) I , N 57^21'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 20.65 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
iit
/ �- w �\ �� �) /, 1 / $ 1 I I I I /• ( ` BEGINNING AT A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
\ „__-. ^���1 .,' (•�'=_j`i �, `�~ )� �i� / % �/ ` �, J� �,�, /! $ INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAGLE BEND (50' R.O.W.) AND ^
r` ; �,-� ( ` �� , 4r / ?' THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK I OF THE FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON GOLF N 34 06'44' W, A DISTANCE OF 167.26 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
;' - - \Z / �' COURSE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2985 & 2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
SIS'� -$'VII 6�'' `�. 9�•�x __, - ', COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R
r _N`6 �/\ , C \___� - .T.C.T.);
/ ` '
1 �,, - <, .:. `-- / ./� 0', �/ i , N 44^45'05' W, A ■
I ;'i-= i ' . \ _ �\� , / DISTANCE OF 237.79 FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
'I \ _ N. , �, ` I , THENCE N 19^50 28 E, OVER AND ACROSS SAID EAGLE BEND RIGHT-OF-WAY, A 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER•
�(,��;, J \� \ �' I , , h ' �'` .y t , ; �a �. DISTANCE OF 71.27 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET IN THE '
J /;' .,- '� J %j % \ ��..T t, � Q. �, / / I SOUTH LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID TIMARRON GOLF COURSE; N 04"14'19' W. A DISTANCE OF 162.86 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
f ,�' �, \ I _�.�, , Q� �. l 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
�� Y. j . f, 4 . THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT I, BLOCK 3 THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN
- t\, ,- ( I � j \' . 1 1 �l\ to . �,o OHO �,� I COURSES AND DISTANCES; N 65"34'14' W, A DISTANCE OF 250.71 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
_ ,� �-`\ \.-\ / • ' ,;`�, 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
- �, \_. w w • \ � 1% �� • N 61^57'14' E. A DISTANCE OF 60.28 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
r
�^�,\ �_- I`,, �'un , ` \ _ " `% 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 73^42'27' W, A DISTANCE OF 156.09 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
- / 5 LII' TO EXISITiNG � ,_� . .�
` PAV(D PUBLIC ROADWA (/ `�'\, �i I\ `�� �� '', . I - r _ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
yf , �., I .\ U. 1 '47' E. A DISTANCE OF 99.42 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED
�� -
S 61 06
i (; [''' r i i w w : 1 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 40^31'17' W. A DISTANCE OF 82.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
�,; '` j' r�Jj��T QI _,�EV�-�y. ,� /w J' 1 _ '- 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
0 00 200
w � ,
t --
1
�_ � , '.` .',,__.= � � -_ S 29"{O'34' E, A DISTANCE OF 104.75 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
/ _ �/ w w / , I --�. __ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 49^35'42' W, A DISTANCE OF 210.47 FEET TO A 5/8- IRON ROD CAPPED
- - i / j\,� /) J i , � • y y y I; �i \I �' ; - ` ;, i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
- ` / r - / GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
I - 2 I ii;;Q ' + `- t 1 S 04"00'07' W, A DISTANCE OF 261.06 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
I
: , ^} j ���/ i ) �1 w Ir / Ii' �t 1 ; I - t . 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 06^36'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 266.29 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED r 1'=100,
: f i + 1 �/ \ ( f Q � y � I / j ! . 1 ! I j \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
1 �/ , 0) O. / y t % , 1 '� +� S 29"07'55' E, A DISTANCE OF 315.24 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
! I '' "! l l w , !' ' ; , � , - t, 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 47^2I'S1' E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\ / 1.
COMMON GRLN - "` w It 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
w
�" - I 1 t
1 /' f, \ / 1 I ! i S 78"22'10' E, A DISTANCE OF 80.12 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 04"09'35' E, A DISTANCE OF 325.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED
�' ; I 1; �) J' LOT 52 y w w 1 / I Q , ` 1 \ f 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
I \'� ,' ,�_, �' w 1 k/��, , )\ +; s S 35"04'16' E. A DISTANCE OF 289.18 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
1\ �- / ��� / �w y,w w I 10' U,E �� �' ; 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 31^39'05' E, A DISTANCE OF 391.58 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
'
'
L��EII
I��
�v
I
i
V:y
��
'
■ • ii�
0
so
����
1..
III
, .
•..
P Al{7
=;,
v
1
is •
v'
��
`,J / W _y , '\ (; % - , CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; OUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE
-_ - - , _ i ,__ I I ��/ %I ,�,\' •% /` `\11 1 .__ � t , I S 03"19'50' E, A DISTANCE OF 480.45 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED
) / \ (� 1 ( s � \ � ,�, N� \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 19^50'28' E A DISTANCE OF 401.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
�/! `/ /w w y t. \. '', �% � 'DIY, F! ! , AND CONTAINING 56.814 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS.
t / j` ) 1(-- ' v w w w w f �. , G L1= CO��Rr,.SS S 43^16'34• E, A DISTANCE OF 120.93 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
// ! � /// /�� w V I J �\ 1�-� CAB. SLID yc9$6, I �I 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
>- ��/' / ''/. F / \ \ ' 4 , \ '`� RTCT - i S 76^45'48' E, A DISTANCE OF 529.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
>;� - %
✓ t.' moo\_ \I , I \ cJ L�: MEDIA NStTY E N 89^34'15' E, A DISTANCE OF 977.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
�� / ; (% ) / \ /\I , ` �1 ,, PRODUCT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
�1�0 ! \ i I 1 - �1 10 -
E"ti� z ' ) _i\� /' \ Q �t- - L, J = �1 N 55"54'42' E, A DISTANCE OF 22.57 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
�} ' `1 l�l ( l E A 'CARTER & BURGESS'SET FOR THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST
'( i , 1 �- i_- � /; / I, ( \ rJ ,f '� r f-t j �`,� - `�/ CORNER OF TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LEGEND
J �S6 . ii ����-' ( / 1 ` \ 1`�, , s� �j l 1.�, ��'� _ _ 1 SOUTHLAKE. RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 2625 P.R.T.C.T.;
i, LLI a; ' I I 2 /1 ,1, t J
( ! _- I ) `I ,�(/ / j I i / \ , / i ,1 \ \ t }1 ( THENCE S 00^22'19' E, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE,
/ (�.CL' ~' 1 `__ 4i X I !� -\- i� 1 1: \`', \\�`,`_' \ ' A DISTANCE OF 1034.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BUR T CIRF CAPPED IRON R F
GESS' SE OD OUN
� % J N;� '"' ` %--- �Q % i \ 1 `, - t - L "I \ �j t \•,. \' - J \ +,. (i FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK IIF SAID TIMARRON GOLF
�' Jm;a oQo - I I - 4Y / ,� ��p ._. \ r., COURSE: CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET
/ \ _., `,' 11 Ir - .�1 „ / G- . p^ r�.�(^'. �, �1. THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY FIVE COURSES ANO STREET CHANGE
' ( 4 �' %8 ■ ! ; DISTANCES;
'I ,1 f i i' / I ))/ I (`�^� / / �' �. 22��0 E : �v� I UE UTILITY EASEMENT
ism
- \
.. - _ -
\ _
11 ~ , -. N 54^16'41' W, A DISTANCE OF 494.67 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
I ; ` t, /\ / / \ 9_ '_- _ O•l2 DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
/ (,_ �� _ I I 1 / / / \ \ 1 l 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
�) 1 \\
f TiMARRON C_- ; - ; / ,
- � ��%'� -�! / 1 \; \ , I' ' i ' ` N 74^00'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 314.17 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED BL BUILDING LINE
/o (� `E) !G'OURS /�; , ' ' /�' 49 i % � \ \ 7 %, \ 1 f % �'' \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
; --�._ N 46"42'32' W. A DISTANCE OF 67.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
t.., 't a�RTCT / \ � ' ',- - :�' I. / / I � \ 1 �� 1 /� 1 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
/ / I + '
ZONED: PUD 480-OIC r Ij/ _ i � \ - v
(/ , ( \ ; \! 1 �' t N 66"37'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 142.51 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPE
D
j 0: MEDIUM. , DENSITY RESIDE ` T��1�� � / ' O
- \ 1 �9 I t 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
1 \`
8 '
__-._i,, :, ?? I 48 �' \ . ��i �`� - O S 88"38'35' W, A DISTANCE OF 162.56 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
J' r \ .11 ; f �� /I r -10` L}; l ? l ` \ `� 4 . I \ '. 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
f �/ \\_ � �1 1 �. J,I'I � rl, I N _�_ -` w %/ ; I ! a\ j\ • , �'-, { I\' _ - S 79^40'50' W, A DISTANCE OF 210.81 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\� - if / 1 __�. 1 31 � J \ , % \ , I� \.'`'_- )� , ,i 'CARTER & BURGESS*SET FOR CORNER;
r-� __ -
_ a' / I m\ _
( -T- -- ! _
1 ;s; I -. __ \ o_ 1 :\ _, ,,,:,- r S 84^26'37' W, A DISTANCE OF 120.95 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
a ; U -_ ' 1 , \ \ 9' G 1 1 \\ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
\,
J \' 1 '
/ ` � I , I O - 1 I / -
i _ .- a-,
``'\ / � J I J I I ! / \ \ �• - EXI TiNG 15' y),' J� S 76^15'01' W, A DISTANCE OF 177.13 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
�',,\`, '._`` . �__ NiQ'j m 47 1 / .` I S U E ' ` - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
I I1` ) ,. `` I I ` .� VOL. 11558 PG. 6 7 -
_` \ ') �� 1 I J 40 1 -- `i I' • - 1 \� ; S 61^44'08' W A DISTANCE OF 114.59 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
,A /" /s ' O+.n I - , . ` n '` I . '' I \ I ART R & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
I _ I ,/ ii ", �T, ; N I ;rl � REED �
i n I / �M N I S 89 '22' W, A DISTANCE OF 32.88 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
1 \ 7, I % I `� VARIABL WIp7H � & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE
_.I r I ;; ^•�,T
�� ! :�� , i 00' 1 INA , ry j R;
O
I
t , ' 46 �- I 36 1 'D i
\ EMEI
v 'I I RA G EAS
ice;/� I -NI - I` rF '1 \II
i _ /
I
t, \
+ 1 -- 41 �! ,/fir 1 . TIMARRON
,/It I / -� 1 . t "
(" I , 1, I I � I , \ I ( , -� / STRATHMORE
/ r ;& I i \)
\`i J ( _ \, ,t.�� CAB. A, SLIDE 2395
�' I / r a' 35 I i I 11 �`
�- J � I PRTCT
fl .I
Q s w
�= r-- ---�., '. ;;I j � .-� ,r �O � „. ., _ � ,., - LUD: MEDO MDDENSDITYB R 01 DENTIAL
\ / �% ' i - \ -_ \' � I � J. 1/} \� j i ���- *VILLAGE '1' INCLUDES BYRON NELSON PARKWAY
1! ,
i
/ 1( \f
\ /
/ Y 1
r ,.
,
,
\ 12 r r-�. I .
r
-;.
-_ 4 I '.
v 3 v 1 rr r I I i�
_
Z �I
I p N0 ES.
I I �� i T
. , / ; O fi 44 \
�� , `I °�W - \ \ ; I \ k �, J - I. ES DENTIA P
I
- ,
o,
XI TIN
\ 1I
-y_ �,_ 1�, -- -_ -- _ : - - -- - -- - - _ - - __ EXISTING LAND DESIGNATION: MED UM DENSIOTIY RESID NTIA
,
w1 ___ -- , - - -- - - �-- L/,/ -
'` - w\5 O i , � -\ - r -ri` I _ 2. ALL BUI IN T
■ 4 , 43 -- - - - 29 \ P� O ` y-' � t-- - - f' - _ 1 _ ,, / �, , : THE DEVELOPMENT
_ ---,�
( LD G SE BACK LINES SHALL BE PER
- ------ , f - - R E G U L A T I A
_ ' _ _ _-- "_ _ / ONS TTACHED TO TH
\ 11 ) - . - - __ SUBMITTAL.
\ ;
_ 1
{
�.J - , _ .. J - - S
- -
1 s
I + 1.
,
-- \ 9 9
�� --- - '�- r - a 3. VILLAGE J INCLUDES A R
• _ _ _ x _ i1 LL ES DENTIAL LOTS COMMO
m _ \ \ N GREENS
_ - \ \ ; ' , \ - �. _ . \ -- - - 'r- \ I, i/ AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS.
f. \ - _ _ /i r 1 t / x\\ 4' TIMARRON ( 1 1
- - c� 6- ,
-- -- /
/ / \ , \ r - 1, � \ OLF R ;
,
:
- G COU SE � f�''- /
28 . 9 ;�
- -- \ - D m ) % 4• SCREENING FENCES AN WA
\ 1
/ \ .-- \: ♦ �� J'- S'' �` _ CAB A SLIDE 298 - 1 I D LLS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
t I J .I
r i
1. �' . - s ; _.__ r 6 c);o r ,\ ; ���' SIGHT TRIANGLES R
1 / \ ; ; �. - , PRTCT -(.� i �.._._� 0 V SIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC
�_ : /% 1 _
1
`� ;
f1 ..- \ 9 _ ___ � ' + t � I fi o. - - ` ,z: N ERSECTIONS.
1 -'s, - - ZONED. PUD 48 01
- \ I,... _
1
�__z
1;' i i' $? ( ! lUD:.MEDIU D NSITY RE I NTI - �,v�
�� \ 1 i \ �-•--- / x
I _ i I 1 c/ 1 _ 4 t\ J i :' S 1
,, 9 - - - ,
/ , ... © 1 TH MAXIM
� ._ _ --- _� ,, ,/ , 1 .--,- . •�, ,,, _ , - E UM GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIA
�•.: 7 - - - _ L USES WITHIN
\ \ %c� /
J J
,
_ - 1 B - �. ! - - • E VILLAGE INCLUDING COMM N R
\ t , - /I' \ ( ; 1 L , ( , / N55 54 42 -.Irk 0 G EENS IS 1.48 DU/AC.
, , ' _ --
\ \ ! --
h..
J
- / _ ;�, 9 34 15 E '\ _22.57'
\ t / I ; , \ - \ _ 1 - _ - - % ; ti ,. __ - L.U.D. - LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM CITY MA T P
0
1t � , ; I � . - _ I \ , --- _ , -. - - S ER LAN
-
\\ ti \ . -- -
�� l R _ - ,
/�. - 6 _ -_
\ _ LO K I y - I
/ ,-- v I \ t _ I J
1�
\ /y t w w _
/ .� 11 i \ \ , 1+ ,
_� ,
�. -- !
(/
. , l __. - (' 1 �• , - ;.. , / sue. ., ': _ram" `... w w ; w
\ \ 20 B.L.;
\ w __� 3Q1 32: 35 36 .J
1 ,
6 \ _
w _ _ ,, _
,
�.. a _ ., yaw _ i 38
i „ 1
_ r,:' z LDULE 0 DEVELOPMENT
- J 1 w w lr / I 15 L. �1
J - _
-I { _ o t , -
,,.� r _ .. - _, ',. \,r -- ,-- ,i, , � . � __. r \_ ._ _ �J- w y y /Jr r- - � BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
,
f /� - � 1 NNNNNNNNNt7 i O +
_ b'
U,r ;'`� / J w wow FAL 1997
! \ � a
% Qr Ci % _ L
',. -'', I L , ! , , ./ / �:, _ / I,/ i I1.I w y I ` _-_- _ �^ - .b ,v I �. w -.
j1//
'' �f .. 'j , UCy
I I
,. ` ( - -- - - - - -''`
\ � \ V W' A. E WIDTH ,. / • / -- - w w w k w \ -- 1
• I w
;1
j Y�_ \, - \.E<. T Jf\ w _ --�. ) w B + A C SStNG
i I I R
` _-
�-
\\ 1 -,\ +, \- -- - ,/ '\ V • � / j'I\ y �. w `"'x y - --_�_\ .�:..,.. w w w , �' W y y w 5O'
---- \ \\\ \ \ Li --�\\\ �� 1 I J I,'jJ� ( i s i / \ \ •� \`` . �.• .`_ -_- - - w , w w w I I w w 6 5 4 y .� �. w .� I;
'I \._\ l� (\\ I \\ I •�y� /�� I :,`, . W 1 , :,! 1),' _ y �, ' '. 135� 8 -f- - _�- ---"_�� i-- _-- .r- w w I t.. �` w w 3 .r, w w t . �, w /� �-
`- ` \�`Jl l� ,.. W ii 1 1 r ;/ , r i s 1 .-' / w w 1 / / ,, \ _ _ ` -. _ - mot- . w Jr 2 ' � � J. w w w J. u l •L I V' U1
\\\ / L_
1 2
\ ti -.�-� -� yy y .L w... y 4 t:�
LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
r f s' /
f.', r
\ f /,' ) /
PARCEL
ANTICIPATED
COMPLETION
DATE
ZONING
LAND USE
NO. OF
LOTS
ACREAGE
DU/AC
COMMON
GREENS
COMMON
GREEN
ACREAGE
% OF
OPEN
SPACE
PHASE I. SECTION I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
66
32.81
2.01
2
2.78
8.5
PHASE I. SECTION 2
N/A
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
95
69.67
1.36
4
13.35
19.2
PHASE 2. SECTION I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
32
16.81
1.90
1
0.78
4.6
PHASE 2. SECTION 2
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
55
41.85
1.31
3
7.18
17.2
BRENWYCK
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
56
27.63
2.03
2
5.24
19.0
WYNDSOR CREEK I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
84
40.74
2.06
3
5.02
12.3
GLENDOVER
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
53
38.86
1.36
3
7.23
18.6
ESTATES
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
30
22.78
1.32
3
4.72
20.7
VILLAGE A. PHASE 3
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
5
5.7
0.88
0
0
0
CRESCENT ROYALE
N/A
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
155
48.21
3.22
13
7.15
14.8
STRATHMORE
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
109
61.50
1.77
3
2.53
4.1
WYNDSOR GROVE
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
III
51.86
2.14
4
6.71
12.9
BRENWYCK II
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
112
44.78
2.50
6
1.33
3.0
VILLAGE 'H'
SUMMER 1999
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
225
91.17
2.47
5
3.99
4.4
VILLAGE '1' *
SUMMER 1997
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
145
61.01
2.37
5
5.09
0.8
VILLAGE 'X
SPRING 1998
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
84
56.81
1.48
7
5.4
10.0
WYNDSOR CREEK II
SPRING 1998
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
26
15.93
1.63
4
2.9
18.0
SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
1443
728.12
1.98
68
81.41
11.2
GOLF COURSE
---
148.73
---
---
148.78
---
CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USE)
---
12.61
---
__-
-__
--_
SUBTOTAL GOLF COURSE
---
161.34
---
---
148.73
---
PHASE 5 C-2 USES
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
2
10.69
---
---
---
---
PHASE I C-2 USE
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
2
6.04
---
---
---
___
SCHOOL SITE
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
I
17.42
---
--_
_-_
__-
GRAND TOTAL
1448
923.61
1.56
68
230.14
24.9
j 1 - -
/ y w w
■ Y
`\ / I
'`.` 4 , \ I : ,/ + , 1� y , / 1 -- - /. � _ --__- - _ I - - - .._ _ ,t- .✓ w w J, w. .L .L J, w ,,,, \ 9 �5m'� ---:I
/ ^ >.;. 30 COMMON - --- w y w
['� .:.::.�. ,.�. ..�. ,�: ,I, w w y y y .� w w w w i i y w'
\ -��, \ . , w�l h $ :EASEMENT I y_ .= # k b
�.\ �. - :`:- ._ .. L. ._._ - . -. ._ . -.... _. -- y y. y � w w :I, .I, w w W w `.w .1: ,I: ,r,. y _____ ....-. -.
0
\ \ _ . w J. -
r. .m-.:.: �.
,.' w w w w Qy
w �•+' W. �L w y
V
1
+ - _- - w w w
\. -i w -w w w
. ` \ \ ^�/1f\ ma y: - -� '... -. .. . - _ _._ . �.. J _ y -`.. .1: - w w w w :e-" -'y w w ._'.y w .v I I I �. w ' "k /.
1 - +N
vw - _'---' ,\ \ l \ 1 - w w ' w w .f. w w N,-. �J: I y,yy'tiI J -.� ..` �� ♦, �.� w w - i / w w w w .L . w1 w w w W, y ��i ....
_- __----" \': \ ,\ �\ l �/ I w .�-. " w w w w .I. / _ _. --_- - - < �. 4 /N S - w - ,i,� '\ w w w y .1- W .I, y .I. y w - _ _..
` '�
\ - - - _ ___
f
\ ,� CK 62 � �
,.. - \. I, `\ \ \, � \ • I, O ' w .I- / 1u. I., 1 \ w �''. � w - III {'�Yp 9
- _ T
\� , - :', \.r C� w EXIST • l5-ti:E--�-'_- \� w ~ - - y w w w w {
,� .. � -' -- 1 \w w w - w w O IMARRON ADDITION
\
\ r` w w - - -- VOL.11558 PG. -7 . � `Z-. w w
f \ � �'� w 25,B.�. ; 1 r r __._ ---------------- �\ �' �_-w_ w - 10 .Il w CRE NT ROYAL
\ - R
�, (/ _, '� w / _ - - _ w ,w w ! _ y A' CAB AE SLiOE 2626
J \
t �`°-.. `\ \ . - 1 /jI t w o - r - r J _ - - _ _ -\ - `.. -.-.:� .- +k•-�--�1--..w ,, .., -vim. W \...... / ,�, ,\ J/:"'''\.� (''� -__- J . y , -�, y,, 7 • `, PR T
.. \�\d \ \ 1 f /-� / J , _ i/ w nn ` _ . . _ . , r _ _.-- \ - �L' : 1A..�Jc. _�� ,l, �. w w \ J C -J
A....__�_^ r -
END CONSTRUCTION
SUMMER 1998 ,
DATE REVISION MADE CKD. APPD.
&1-
.. .. \. 1 .:..\ f / �i \ VV IU \ w w - y w.__.I. Z+�. �.♦ .� w \ - _ -"' N... •,1 - ��/
1 t / \ I l Fl.- J ^ d �I ,j LU LU. UU 4� U1C
�••� 19
1 r \ / C / r r-
r
It / - _ W 6 .� , ..,.w LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIA �
e� A 5 I L:s
;• i
.. _ i w .� TIMARR
`� �,\ . � _ ^ W 5 A1 9 3 w. � � w w - i � ON ADDITION
/� j%
' j/j�/1 I .:. , , \\ r y ...- G A •"1 � 6 S s w ' _. w :,, � .i- .I. w w �. w • - _ _ ` ; :
\J /, .. i r , a i Jam+ I - --' w ,6�.,1. I w i/ a
„ _ .v- -
I.,", \ `
/ \\\
TIM N A ITI - f." \ .. 01 10.95 w w • w -. � / w 1 ;
\ s L y y w y w _ y; VILLAGE J , 9
cc �/ G
PHASEy ,'`SE ION 2Q �- <' ..� - :: S ^ w Q w -
:. . , r :' r .-- -:. , L , ! t ��_ I \ •,, � / *� � ,13 4 2 3 2 W `� �: f /, \ � y y \_1� 1 r , I v:::,'^. '\
\ jJ -j , ,; 1i MON -v��
E'STAfi , fi B T CREEK r / ._ i 1 _ ,'\
I
�: ,\\ \ ,. f � -,,� �, � �. � � �. � �. w Ew ,.;-'� __ _ r' 'I __ OUT OF THE
/� \\ 6 7 /�
1 ;; . j i .may. ,, Q \� �`._ I\ _ A i _ V 1. 0 5 T� 1 "W w w w w \�.-.,) r, r (- w ,
CQ SLl E 1711 } / / r D► / / ;' \_
..
(/
/ %; E
I TC _�,.'' ! y":� 6� A� = I ; Nfq., x ,F: sots y w.,.w-,w \ �r =-jam _ 4k, I ., HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1037
\ -�S.- N572159, S �� \ 0� ��wwww \ /,r/�l!I
ZONED: PUD 4 O-QIC /-
°; ;, :',1': ,-- RON I I 3/ \� ; w w w z / J _ l HOB ORTH
'�• , !
t &T
20.65 TIMAR 4, �w w w w r. 1 rka S 1 V! y rABSTRACT IN THE
LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL "'I �, yy � PRODUCT GO F R 1'�I .4 w w w � ��- /J//, I, 1� ----�---- - ----------I�lk7. �97
♦�� S89 03 22 L COU SE \ \w w w - lr. W� r - -
"` - I I y y �, cnr, [ / OR, SUR Y� ' C OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY TEXA
Ij
\ 32.88 CAB. A SLIDE 2986 A _ 4�:, _: >.
j(/ y S
PEA _,r i' B'ST�;�_CT ,N ;4,
_\ f ' ,-'� - PRT T \w �,
t
r .� . . }
JI 4 t N71 28 50 W _ = J _ .._ / m;_ \�
- - \ , 6 6 0 , ZONED• PUD 4 OIC- - , - / � - 56.814 ACRES/ 84 LOTS
\ �\� f ; ' t ' , � rio,1
, , . 38.46 21.33 �.J I _�\,
- - \°., •_ \.\ i : LUD: MEDIUM DENSiT r RESIDENTIA \ - - �"LL -i r'
- _
- -- - - - L
\\' t A _ COMMON
\ G
�� \\ .1 �� •. �f" oN; I' `'`�\� 7 REENS
;\
7L ^
/` ;` \\:.-*, ,- �� ` \ / _ •8 \ CAI \ _. \ \ T
,'\1141, : � r - __ _ \ \ OWNER/ V P -
`�'� / _ \ = n,: DE ELO ER• WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P•
/
1 \\
\`
\ .,_u4
A
P
P
-: 05 V RGINIA ARKWAY
/r= -�, � �y \ �``1\ \� � I ' v" ' McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070
i /- \ - - -
' `..
_ ♦ ,I p�, - 7 = ---- `\ \�. (9 2) - 988 FAX (972) -5540
sue_. ll
5 9
\<\
F
\ \.\ - -
,
„ y \ N I N •
. , __� ` �� � //`-' _ , E G EER. CARTER & BURGES INC.
\ �'/ ..�� -\..r = -\-z� .6-r- -_-- ._ ` :=_ = ,`cam. f . \ _ -. - . 9
r
,, E
,: � _, _ j �`� �`� , \___!,� .,. r \ /\ _ 7950 ELMBR00K DRIVE, SUITE 250
-�� 4 / {\,
�- -./,r
\\ �� \`\�\`I\�� - _.. �� )!� - - -' ; -. DALLAS, TEXAS 75247
--\ o\\\ ;;- -' - , \\ \ (214) 638-0145 FAX (I -
-- - -- \C� 1 2 4) 638 0447
1
APRIL, 1997
CASE NO. W� C&B JOB# 952236010
DDA�CDTV nCCrOIDTIAM
N
m
to
m
I
1
N
N
N
N
0
N
m
m
m 1
m ..
m - In
- v N
11 11 11
-Z=
0 o m
w m
L, -
c co s
X X U
X X
-
ZE�
- m
w •
I Z
J 4
O J
m a
i m
m m z
w m o
- a
m o m
m m U
m m m
N - J
N v -
in H
m m -
/ / /
Zzz
o-o
m-,
--,
¢ 4
m`2�
H H
N H
/ / /
m m m
000
��.
LLL
11 11 11
LL LL LL
wwul
-mm
m
-
,
[n
m
-
m Nm
v 1? N
1 o m
N -
11 1, 1,
zz=
000
m
O J -
N w m
m ¢ X
m w -
9 m
N Z
z a
J J
a
N w -
m c� -
m 9 m
/ /
w -
o H m
0
N J m
m w -
- w m
m d- N
m•-m
/ / zz�
000
¢ m ¢
2 ¢ c6 4
1-I - H
/ / i
m m m
O m O
.1 n
LLLL LL
W w m
��T
m
m
m m
mN
zzz
0-0
m
X J ¢
X LL J
4
J Z
- H
J
J J
Z
O , U) ..
Zo-
o • m ,
Z ¢ m - W
N--
�-
� I�-1 N
O if J
m � m
/ - J
Z Z Z LL m
moo;
=�.
K 4 J Z
< < > O
� mM - ¢
/ , ro -
mm In �,y
oomm�-
o m o m
1, (z i1 w J
-m
m
-W LL ,
W W t. ,� LL
�ww-
N
- e 11
N •
VJ
m
- b
1l)
0
-- o
m o
m m --1
I
m
m
11 11 . 'O O
-¢
Z Z Z W
m o - „ ¢
...m
0
o m -
d N J
O N u, LL
m - > a
x x m w
x J :
- a
0
Z J -
6
L �
Z , C
_1
J J
a c a
m
N 6
Z N
, I z I ••
/u
m -
0m
am�m,.
O N O m •,
N m N ,J
Hm H N c
m - .,
;�1--,
,.
Z Z Z Z
----Q
= I = m
�-��-
ti I
-
m m m m
0000,
,
L L L 0
,
11 11 11 „ u
L LL LL Z C
w w w c
¢ s ¢ o a
TIMARRON ..•_. _.... ____....._..
GOLF GO.URSE BEING A 56.814 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, N 71^28'50' W, A DISTANCE OF 21.33 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
-._�-?;, - � ,' "r/ 1 / • % ABSTRACT NO. 1037, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
�\ �`�`�� Ck�t�G'\1-ID 298, ��� -- �`�/ y TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P• RECORDED IN
���`��-������,\�� \ `\ / , VOLUME 12613, PAGE 9813 OF THE GEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N 46^46'10' W, A DISTANCE OF 38.46 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\- �� //�-- �=-�� 1 ��, rr1,,\�,,� ) r \ ( j / / (D.R.T.C.T.). SAID 56.814 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
' -- = 1. I / � {'.'� °I �.
: Z��'N�,p• Pub-__Q.!•t, METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS. T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
' �/ /� �,' ' \ \\ \1\ i / N 57^21'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 20.65 FEE
LUD: DIUM,, D€NSI, ' , SIDENTIAL BEGINNING AT A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
L
(EXISTING 50' ROW) EAGLE , \ \ , \ _• - " ( �'� ,' ./, r) I ; ,,t
BEND , ♦ / / l �• INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAGLE BEND (50' R.O.W.) AND
�., ,. `� ���� f /�i/% // ri /�%;l 1; 1 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK I OF THE FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON GOLF N 34^06'44' W, A DISTANCE OF 167.26 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
' �_�,./� ��'� \�\, ; 0,.` f �\ \ �^ (" - ,/� ,�•';,' ; ! /" COURSE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2985 & 2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
_. f Y` \ \� --�- - / l ♦ COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R.T.C.T.);
2� q
j �`•. . ,' � N 44^45'05' W, A DISTANCE OF 237.79 FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
�4 \ . �l .-,::,. ` -' ���.' ; i � i THENCE N 19^50'28' E, OVER AND ACROSS SAID EAGLE BEND RIGHT-OF-WAY, A 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
' / \3I "� `' h V .' DISTANCE OF 7i.27 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET IN THE
J�(' • -') � q, ; ``` �j� \ \ iy � / �� �' SOUTH LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID TIMARRON GOLF COURSE; N 04^14'19' W, A DISTANCE OF 162.86 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED
�J1, = } \ ( Q 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
1/
�% t, ( ��\`�� \ �' y'• I \' �1 _,- Q� .` THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT I, BLOCK 3 THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN N 65^34'14' W A DISTANCE OF 250.71FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\J -) r, f A ) I 0\
%% / r ��/ \ • •• . COURSES AND DISTANCES;
{�_� / ♦ `` ` �' `, �. ' �O ,' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
Q -- N 61^57'14' E, A DISTANCE OF 60.28 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
, < �V ` -- ' �+ �� �' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 73^42'27' W, A DISTANCE OF 156.09 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
D w t"-_� / ' y, �� \ `+ \ ` +� 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
l� '
'/ �^ ;mil �;� t ,�,- + �- - .= S 61^06'47- E, A DISTANCE OF 99.42 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
: /�\�( j \\�i r J} ,!" /mil U. i� �v - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 40^31'1T W, A DISTANCE OF 82.55NFEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 0 100 200
- 1 '. ;' r - \ CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR COR ER;
i i !1'\ /,I \� '+'.�' ^( + r } 145' 1 Iui -__ __ S 29^10'34- E, A DISTANCE OF 104.75 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
i'P01 yT ��t �EG,I Ill G, I -' �'' / --- � "*' CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE , CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE � ET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED RAPHI SCA IN F T
4 2' W
) \�_ _ 1 /iJ 1 I } -0 I I ; I -'-* r - ;' S 04^00'07' W, A DISTANCE OF 261.06RFEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED G C LE EE
N 49^35 . A DISTANCE OF 210.47 FE
�/ R•
I ^ % ' 1 / ow -- " 1 j ', ' ` �� C N 06^36'33' W. A DISTANCE OF 266.29 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED I'-100
: , `i\_ / i ' (p - / i , h,;� \,. . 1 �� ! _ ARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
_ / / ( 2 , I t : + } \\ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
,-7 / ) ' 4 `�`I I "I ET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
' \ / J •i ' 1 ! ' L� . \ S 29^07'55' E, A DISTANCE OF 315.24 FE
t f � / t� �t t !; , l / ;I �\ TO A 5/8 IRON ROd CAP ED
I I / I * ' _ __. ) , , I , -.� \,'\ .t , `� \ i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; T R RDI SS SET FOR CORNE
: �// / , i i -' '' �` / a► ( / 179'/ i , I • • \ CARE & BU
N 47^21'51
E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET P
t ,
,- y 1 J ///I/ i
�i ':
f � ; ` - / rn
- ^'
COMMON t;R�.EN-. J'
t` � I
, :I , ;tt
`1 J, '
\ t
1
\_) \ \ `- " i , ,,
- __
'\. '.
S 78^22'10' E, A DISTANCE
'CARTER & BURGESS' SET
OF 80.12 FEET TO A 5/S IRON ROD CAPPED
FOR CORNER;
N 04^09'35' E, A DISTANCE OF
'CARTER
325.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED LOCATION MAP
/', i \.^
,..- :
/
, ,
O
\ \
4'
& BURGESS' SET FOR
CORNER;
_ , i / i'" I ,!
--- -' " I ; cJ
, 1
( LOT 52 -
r
,_ r,\,` I
- f"
, N I
a I;' +
I N , _ a
+
-`)
1, (�
," i -- i 1 t
\,.
'� , i �+
S 35^04'16' E, A DISTANCE
CARTER & BURGESS SE T
OF 289.18 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
FOR CORNE R;
N 31^39'00. E, A DISTANCE OF
RTER & BURGESS' SET FOR
N.T.S.
T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
391,58 FEE OUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE
CORNER•
1 `, / ' �^ ( �/: i r / ' ` `n 10, U•E' X ,, , • �, CA
I i / t\ \;, 1 r ,r / I 1 � I - ,`�'' I S 03"19'50' E, A DISTANCE OF 480.45 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
\ �� /' ) ) f , ( y,,, �, ,- ( 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
N 19^50'28' E, A DISTANCE OF 401.96 FEET TO THE POINT` OF BEGINNING,
( \-� J ( .F.-16.306 I -/._ ' ', ( i AND CONTAINING 56.814 ACRES OF LAND. MORE OR LESS.
„' I } ) ! \ , / \ \ . \;\ , 1 °! S 43^I6'34' E. A DISTANCE OF 120.93 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED
i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
'� \• ( f : / \ i \ - . \ S 76^45'48' E. A DISTANCE OF 529.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED
f / \ 11 i \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
\\ __ •
. : � I I , I
` ! / /; �(,: / - ` �6' i '. f �0 '-%% LOT �� BLOC 3 1 ,` w N 89^34'15' E, A DISTANCE OF 977.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
+�
<; - - f -!/�\�y I , oo,\ / \ ; I I It �3 O - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
/'�� i _ "�: ram_-_. _'_� t- ` / ♦ , O
` ) r V N 55^54'42- E A DISTANCE OF 22.57 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
/ , LU � - \ 1_`'�' y \� \' s O � �%+ ^ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST LEGEND
- ' S �+ TIMARRON CORNER OF TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
/ . � SOUTHLAKE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2625 P.R.T.C.T.;
p o , N o , ' it I / \ �� GOLF COURSE \, J ,V; THENCE S 00^22'19' E, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE, CIRF CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND
J ; ; `-�', _ ,, o : \. � h F , AB. A, SLIDE 2986
Z_ ♦�C! 6- {o A DISTANCE OF 1034.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET
�.' l FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK IIF SAID TIMARRON GOLF
/' ;`'� _ - I j h i fX \ G PRTCT couRSE: CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET
\ _ 1 \ , ,
o ; Qc�-- ,.� I :t ,�� ` i / �° I . , ` 'r + \ Oh}Ep: PUD 480-01C STREET CHANGE
m Iz I I �� I 6 v� `,� L IUM •DE�.Y RESIDENTIAL DISTANCES �NG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY FIVE COURSES AND ICE UTILITY EASEMENT
C \ \ �.
r , : ..
/I � , 1 'I : J V) f /S , i I a 6 N 54^16'41- W A DISTANCE OF 494.67 FEET TO A 5/8' IRO^! ROD CAPPED NT
/ i_jm, r i. 'tip / 9- \ o \ - - EME
( J CO / �Q
J,` i / \ 9
,1I Q Q Q Q C)•12 CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE ,
r / ���� � � � ++ R• DE DRAINAGE EAS
-r; ,: l " ;" _ ,. / �a . - BL BUILDING LINE
�; , : = T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
I i 0• ', CARTEOR &•BURGESSTSETEFOR CORNER;
1 `
i
1 I I: - I, ✓ 7 �, 1
I ) / 1� � �: / 38 y �, ( It - ,� N 46^42'32- W, A DISTANCE OF 67.05 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED
/ t L/ i );' , -� �.-- , /- / / / • \ 1 I 22 . J1 i \ 13 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
__/ / g,! 'L �.. _. - N 66^37'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 142.51FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
i \ fiIMA IRON \ / \p _ - \ ' O I _ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
/ - \ �� 9 /11 I I, _,I `,, R CAPPED
- .) I
�i�Lr COURSE ; / / �y ET TO A 5/8 IRON OD
l - / / --- - --, \ 8 I •/ I �� ` \ % ! O S 88^38'35- W, A DISTANCE OF 162.56 FE
I \
I/ (`_' : ,CAB. A, SLIDE . 29�6 \:r1' I / `, _. \ \ , CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE ,
48 / _
1 \ ZAo i L� ' F 1 � ,i \ n R.
j ; , I_TC ;- 41 / 1 h� \�� `9,D \`� • Qp� `, S 79^40'50- W, A DISTANCE OF 2I0.81 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
�. (( \
)f �` /, i r, ` ' .IC ( N , \ \ It , (1 ` \ 0 •CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
(( { I zoN�b■'Fug, q8o-p I �/ / t / ! 39 ! 37 �� 1 ( \ �o
I/ . I I m\ � I ,i \ ' ' I I \ ram` - S 84^26'37- W A DISTANCE OF 120.95 FEET TO A 5/8- IRON ROD CAPPED
LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 16z., / / P
i--� - ,:1 { - Y - - - 1$8 +n �n ! ' `\ \ i ` /�� \ I I I 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
,,�"'�-�) v, I i� 1 ' 1 �� \ + •F ' S76^I5'01' W, A DISTANCE OF 177.13 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
_.
+ �,' EXIST
(\ .� : , i a. ,' I J 1� i 3 - /.- 109 'I _ ,,_ ' -.,,., 2$ `S'<- ►NG '15' U.E 'CART,ER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
j �`,\.� /J i 1. l,+ t' ,,/�/+1� ,•,O� 47 I I .Y T ` I �+ VOL. 11558 PG. 677 \
& BURGESS SET FOR CORN EE TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED
1 -' I f \. �� i' • I o N I. ��- - � i `� .� S 61"?�4'08' DISTANCE OF 114.59 F T '
- I I I 4 0 _ ti , (c R ER,
%'- I Din 163' m -
-- n
yt
I a+ v % � S 89" '22' W, A DISTANCE OF 32.88 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED
1 11 . iV I N I `� ���� h, �� �� VARIABLE WIDTH �3
I ! Q'� ,, \ S, Lo I RJE'R & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER;
j I � i�� 'V�� f I m1 I 147 \ ` 1 +DRAINAGE EASEMENT l
�i ,tI /_ �,�I+_ . I o 36 oA' I. I •
(/ ',',\�;: \�/� Z 4f- - i - \ 1 �' �. ` TIMARRON
\.-'/ l\/,' - NI I -- I � i STRATHMORE
1
1\\, ., 1 "\ / . ;' ,, _ 165' 41 `°P w� ; C 9 5
I I ~ I .I 'I 1 AB A, SLIDE 23
/ ,//, ;J \ \ I PRTCT
II , ) 9. cn f ZONED: PUD 480 OIC
\1' �. ,: _ +h, i m ,� \ t48' .9- 35 ' I 'r O t t • M DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
y ` A ♦ o _ w
1 n LUD. E
J
I
r V an; �r , apW . \
J
_ t )
PARCEL
ANTICIPATED
COMPLETION
DATE
ZONING
LAND USE
N0. OF
LOTS
ACREAGE
DU/AC
COMMON
GREENS
COMMON
GREEN
ACREAGE
% OF
OPEN
SPACE
PHASE I, SECTION I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
66
32.81
2.01
2
2.78
8.5
PHASE I, SECTION 2
N/A
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
95
69.67
1.36
4
13.35
19.2
PHASE 2, SECTION I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
32
16.81
1.90
1
0.78
4.6
PHASE 2. SECTION 2
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
55
41.85
1.31
3
7.18
17.2
BRENWYCK
N/A
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
56
27.63
2.03
2
5.24
19.0
WYNDSOR CREEK I
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
84
40.74
2.06
3
5.02
12.3
GIENDOVER
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
53
38.86
1.36
3
7.23
18.6
ESTATES
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
30
22.78
1.32
3
4.72
20.7
VILLAGE A, PHASE 3
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
5
5.7
0.88
0
0
0
CRESCENT ROYALE
N/A
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
155
48.21
3.22
13
7.15
14.8
STRATHMORE
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
109
61.50
1.77
3
2.53
4.1
WYNDSOR GROVE
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
III
51.86
2.14
4
6.71
12.9
BRENWYCK II
N/A
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
112
44.78
2.50
6
1.33
3.0
VILLAGE 'H'
SUMMER 1999
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
225
91.17
2.47
5
3.99
4.4
VILLAGE '1' *
SUMMER 1997
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
145
61.01
2.37
5
5.09
0.8
VILLAGE 'J'
SPRING 1998
PO 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
84
56.81
1.48
7
5.4
10.0
WYNOSOR CREEK II
SPRING 1998
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
26
15.93
1.63
4
2.9
18.0
SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
1443
728.12
1.98
68
81.41
11.2
GOLF COURSE
---
148.73
---
---
148.78
---
CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USE)
---
12.61
---
---
---
---
SUBTOTAL GOLF COURSE
---
161.34
---
---
148.73
---
PHASE 5 C-2 USES
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
2
10.69
---
---
---
---
PHASE I C-2 USE
PD 480-OIC
RESIDENTIAL
2
6.04
---
---
---
---
SCHOOL SITE
PD 480-01C
RESIDENTIAL
1
17.42
---
---
---
---
GRAND TOTAL
1448
923.61
1.56
68
230.14
24.9
r
1 I I - . "'1 *VIL GE 'I' INCLUDES BYRON NELSON PARKWAY
1 (�
I 6 9
2
,_ -
_.. t.
T
r j-
r
,I -
�`� -
1 tP
42 1 I 1 Q r
J
r
l
1 �I
3 ! F, - -
22 \/ I y.,.� J
_, f ,
�r \ � �.. % NOTES:
,
I
j I
,' )
I I t \
s i
1
1 - -
;
I /
I
-_ 3
4
t I
`1
I L
2
:
i
_ i
1
I ,
•
:
- I Z \ i : I i' ::1;, I. EXIST NG ZON NG: RESIDENTIAL .U.D. 80 0 C
1 .,� \ '
;I , O 44 n
2 t ; ! ' '" ,,% == "' N ITY R SIDENTIAL
---- I - . - -- - -- - - EXISTING LAND DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DE S E
]' -- - - -- -
i- .
- W - ! ---- LOT ,:BL _ - - - ,; - T DEVELO ME
NT
m z _ _ _- - 2 E
_, 4N 13 �` \ - ` _ .. LDING SETBACK LINES SHALL BE PER H P
,. I, d� z 1 _ _ _ / � \ - \ `� __- �`�__ - _ _ _ °c --. v\ - ALL BUI
;, `
- � ,` . -ll T THI MITTAL.
_, ,
{ 1v _ ` _ _ RE CATIONS ATTACHED 0 S SUB
-I, - , W� 1 U _ _
�O �5 ' " _
- - \ - - - i �- c �'
,, 1
. G
Q\ \'
- \ o \ oo \' 2 \ r r ; ii/ \ \ ,''i j{' i\ ( \ a:D :/C 3. VILLAGE J INCLUDES ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, COMMON GREENS
J
I , 1 a - s\ 33 \ s ,' \� �.� --�;, \ ,� AN RIGHT-OF-WAYS.
` _ - _ - - a� �' - .. ��.- , , - f. , - to r _ice' -`// / ; D
<\ i �... P.. 'i
/1 /J -
(;:
-y s / -. TIMARR - /.
m - g _ �' -
\ _ B:E. \
- - - I t : --�.. _ ;! i HA NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
\ s�- 6'- -, ;� � ; -., GOLF COURSE 1) ) >:m i , / 4• SCREENING FENCES AND WALLS S LL
4�
I / �c
J r
-- - % ( A A LIDE 2986- ` ._ _ c� 0 1 _- I HT TRIANGLES OR VISIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC
I _ - _ - -
,1 9 a
_� \ 9 F -- S \ 1 S G
-_
\�\ �=
.
�_\:- N R
\ P % {,�
\ I 11 \ F s -J zl 0 S
.
E SEC
1
/ 1- ---- -- ,'- ; ; `� '�. . _, ; } �;. �, o ZONED: PUD 480.r-OIC --�_ --�\ _ ��
T T
.v
4, ,
1 �,
UM y D NSITY RESIDENTIAL % \-
r� `� LL \ i ''. _ / _LUD: MEDI E \ ,-', 5. ALL COMMON GREEN AREAS ARE TO BE COMMON AREAS OWNED
1 �� ,
\• - 3 �'\ C- ( r? � �,_ j > �, > AN MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION.
1
1 i / _ i 15 e _ _I. /f/ - � _-'/
`I I o _ \ g 1 -
o _ ' a _- _
1 .� -- �. � = ��- ) N55 54 42 E
l
- , ;
t 9 7 --_ 35 B.L.\ \ ! I Q 5 �' '� t T R M V E D.
-c' 2__ }I _ L O7'_ 6. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE 0 BE E 0
q _j I • I -
G- R
i �/' /3 . 1 v ' C )277 , - - '/ /=- \! _ _ ,\ NS 3 4 '' S E
K _
1
t
.'y 1 __-
-- h \
i�
(. =_ I, I I I I w - J
I
\ ! -
, �, c. _ _
�, r 1 'h 0 - = \ I LiJ -
\ 6 m: i �, . �� U.E
_. _. 1 9 ,
_ I _ �-
/ -,/ - \ _
K
\\ �_
+I ' rn � .- �
J -- -
09 1 II �, 1. \ , \ r N
I,
!1
_ / N.- N
t a / + � Z1 '324 37
-- 20 B.L. 1 I E - \\
= - _ ! 38
C - -�' ,
v ` _
i •.
,
-
- _
,
_ - 1 _ 1 I -- - ( o
, , 4 F _ l - - _ - - - - --I _
,. ` - -
_ , \
_ __ �, _
' / •- _ / I - �- _ "k ' + 0 - 6 TH MAXIMUM GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN
t %
A' '
- \ \ _J: 'Y - / , 1 \ A 3 - \ - - - - `n ^� I ^ ` \�. O i THE VILLAGE J ,INCLUDING COMMON GREENS IS 1.48 DU/AC.
/. _ _
\ - Y _ __ ILA R IN -�-� s�
-• U - I NATI N FR M CITY MASTER PLAN
' �.- _' / \ r y9 �5, I ,_ ,. / 1 t - / y 56 50 R!W_ (3 B.B L.U.D. LAND USE DES G 0 0
/ / _ Q 2 - n , roE �: _ tD
_� _ -
\ ,/r , \\ / \ r, s / , O� .L.
+ ` 15 B }1
�,� , ,, - i '� LA c
I . ____. \e . • ) B. - " ,_) vi '\ �;v SING
r
,
` �, , _
• VlA1�IA E 1yIDTH ! _ _
,
�\ U,
r )) � ( \_ - i I - T H OF EVE PMENT
.:, 1 � � \ \ ... � , , � �.• �-.; _.---- � � lo' u. „\ AN T IC IP A EDUL E D L 0
� 6 5
�. \ , \ �_
\ I 1 '
/ 22 3/,�. 1 k --
. \. \ \ c1 - v :: � / 1
-` _- / - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION
j \ \ \ . 1 / `\ ` to j �^ r - -. - 24 - 1
\\ \ \-- -
8 kn y• - -- ,.. Q -
_ L 7 SUMMER 998
_ I _ ti I ; E �.,:y FALL 199
,, \ , h ,
% \ \ ( / YARFA$LE WID- o _Q- - __� >; -- 36 -
\ \. s --- -_ - - -
\ ) I .__ -
- \\.� \ \ s- D.E. �/ ; h -
,- - �: I \ - �. - - COM ON EN
f - I , ti ,.. it
\ -- V - l = - --- T
s
4
I \ (` t\\, S \ 6' �:° Q �i I'' S=B. I� _\ �e . �(,. - 5 =91,8 7'; ��
N �
G- fi2
. t f 9 _ �- -
��\ ,
,` .p I
` C34
�i
• \
1
-'� \ �.' s� 17 - ,. - - - -� a TIMARRON ADDITION
/ , - _:- \ \__ �i EXIST.lS'tf.E �, \
r
,- � � � �' -. .. , � ., - .'9 N T R Y A L E
L l �� 7 \�r f s1 a CRESCE 0
. � , \�. \ T - VOL.11558 PG. 67T a� IO �
\ ;J - - - •, I CAB. A, SLIDE 262
.� - : 25 B.L. 18 f , ( , 'q �' o ` - N
+ �/ o NE _ -- - -- _ �" /� PRT"GT
�I' N N l - ,> - �. , - ONED• PUD 480 OIC PRELIMINARY PLAT
//j/%,,.'•\ 1 \.\ \ \\ \ 1 r IAA N - L ` . / .TV y ; _-._ / ^ .- i.;l Z
4
\ 'f LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
\� t� FAQ--- --', - SS8 38 35 w F -\ •�. ,�
N
,
/ / �►, `` " •: 12 TIMARRON ADDITIGN
M
- �50 W I .56 6� �/
, ,\ 1 I .- _ 40 62 3 ,
\\,' - -\. _
.
1
\ _ 6 37 21.
\ \ \ \o. 2 S� �Y
.
: \ ` \ .. 4 - S \ I i VILLAGE J ✓
h.
it
j,a � 0•'
a'
W
2
\ � 6 \ _ U. ,
ITS N - -� - J L 2 i E f „ H
TIMAR ON,,: AD 0 \ \� �., , S N46 42 32 W � M N GREE � � 1� � , T OUT OF T E �%
\ _ - •�3 - 1
PHASE 2 SE ION 2A`% (^ - -- ��, - -
\\ \; ; r 7.0 r �(' ;� TRA T N0. I037
0
\ \ / '� '� �,; HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABS C
T NT CREEK \ - 1 �\ / i • --- - % A �� F. 5,2 8 - 92
TAT S A BE - ,. _ N r -
6 5' 9
ES E r A i I I 7q - - 233`
CAB. A, SLIDE 1711 �'' L --- _ -
\, / ,. 6� A� �/ OT I,_ BLOCK i O Jr �`� /;' % %I =rI O�EI ORTH & TT IN THE
N5 RR N 9
PRTCT } < �� � TIMA 0 / /� •- r. ,���J:/ 5URV ABSTRACT N0. 7 7
J
l ( it oo r-
• P D 480-OIC ' r 1 20.65' I ,,-' - `' 1� \ �� i'
ZONED. U GOLF COURSE ., _1 � / '\ \\, \r�,)r f, M DAVENPORT SURVEY- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
\� -�� 89 03 22 W I 986 �'.I w ,
LUD. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -1 '
- C B. A, _ \� \ �I
v n - �''� ' 32.88' A SL DE 2 f, j :1 � BSTRACT N�. =��\
i' v I PRTCT % I m
14 ACRES/ 84 LOTS
K i' ZONED: PUD 4. OIC� \ (,
N 71 28 50 W , r I� -
\� \\ GREENS
o �6 46'1, \ : l -'i - 7 COMMON
\.
/_ _LUD. MEDIUM DENStT RESIDEN L \ -a`; 1 ,q z,
/ 4 -� (38.46 21.33 � 5�j6.-: -' , / f - N z I:
,;
��/
�, t ;. a *_ u-' -. •F �� :ice._ , ` OWNER/DEVELOPER. WESTERRA-TIMARRON L.P.
\ '� -
\ I /
`\ �..
V 1\\
- �`
it �- _.� �� ���� ,
r`� \ (�, .
V
�}
y �„ \\ .;
G
v \
i \
G
\ O� ' �... - l ...
_ / \\
^ /^
G�� -_ \Y
°
�= .
\,\ �,\ \ ) - �* _
-
x.
/ r/ �-�
�- ( ( .\ � , , J ' ,
- ( :
�, \ .-� _ ,
_ 1 f�
7905 W. VIRGINIA A KW
McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070
(972) 529-5988 FAX (972) 529-5540
ENGINEER: CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250
DALLAS,TEXAS 75247
(214) 638-0145 FAX (214) 638-0447
APRIL, 1997
CASE NO. LA 9 f-U5 r t &ts Juts- ti�ccjdvlt
Z
0
100 50 0 100
SCALE IN FEET
1'=100'
PROJECT
LOCATION
L_%. �vtr tr,n�
__SAXON
��TRA/C
LV
F <*�(16
L1� FL14�FL1� F�1� FLIl
s---- N 84-33'42- W N
�9 FL21 F COMMON GREEN gg sa.2s
�op-�-L2��__`BLOCK 55, LOT 22
TBL❑CK 12
64 63 62 61 60
i
100 YEAR
I FLOODWAY LINE
LIMITS OF
awl s
J, 100 YEAR FLOODWAY
'.-WI (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW
011
M.
LIMITS OF
Io i o �I 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
v 6.43 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW
40.37
E:� Q 5.32
v L I n l L n
FLOODPLAIN & FLOODWAY DETAIL
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT
- I I
TIMARRON ADDITION, PHASE 5
� 1
� 1 �
8 �� 11 ' ' ROCKER FAMILY
'
�- S 71°07'05" E WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. 11 11 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
I
71.69 VOL. 12612, PAGE 1631 , 1 VOL. 10432, PG. 1170
10 D.R.T,C.T. 1 D.R.T.C.T.
,
20.sp >,7 1 I� I
>>.p2 2 1 �, LIMITS OF
>.y8 S 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
' ;' 13 !'V 84 �, %J 3 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW)
11063 IF o �p'U. pQ 25• 53'36" , 1 1
�, 12 o E 25' f N 67° 44 36" E
4p \ c, 10665 IF 1 1 o m 83 65 ` 522) 78.16 5 `
4g 38.4S \ �11340 SF �� 10 Of�i '>8 0 2 S 87' 51 '53" E �� LIMITS OF
> o r� ., 77.27 100 YEAR FLOODWAY
TIMARRON ADDITION y.00 'tee. � 0 � 1 1 �� ,�5' l '�8 p I ` �, (FULLY DEVELOPED Flow)
BRYSON SQUARE P 0 84.pp 170 �11515 SF 'IV 10 ekpCK ->80 20.00 y \ J
PHASE ONE s >
o 0
> > 5 r^ o o S i
CAB. A, SLD. 3444 �8.pp 3'36., 22655 86\�, �% 10533 sF �,osg IF �' /0 �; i �o'�� ����01
P.R.T.C.T. \ f N78. 93 r , ^ o <,r l `sue_ I
4 0 / d-1 1 16533 IF �p
a >8. y9 > 1 0,2411 r \ <n 8 M 1 11471 IF
N r 0 6 6p Op4 f >8 p �5' 10992 SF rrr IV) p1 1 co 6 ul\
Mi 6 2 ^I ro 7 �nl In MIN FF> ` w <"
o`N 12 N FF 8, co 5` 2>3 Z > 10' �' 1N of 1 1
cb ') 610_ r 7 ` 7 8_ �Je l r� 1_,w 613. 0 Wo
10579 IF : �O a MiN F �8 •53'36„ S o2 5-33`r 10,0c
0 UEyi I- Z51 � ' \; L8 /
13 V(o - s10 >F. �� _ f \ 8o g 5'--1 o L 6
\ >g 11407 SF V C N) 6 N FF �8.�0\ 3?' 0� �R�� 9 9 4 _J I`t� 4 �_ 1- D=131'41 14"
34-` ��p0. � �1o14R562 F ^ 0.> 67N F -2800 4�� � �70.90 II �o R=50.00
-� 2 "� 15R rn o.> MiN 6 � CIO i "'1 L=1 1 4.92
9 C22 JI �' T=1 1 1 .48
r FF 8 v
6j0.> 3 9.7g 28 -
o; 16R ^ M �8- 02_ C23 I I LC=91 .24
r r 69 2052 S g�. �8. 10 ;h3 5F r 1 7R cV rn 6jo jF 3 ,SIN` 3 78 02-- < i
82.02--- 41 CB=S 03'36 41" E
FF I
D=06' 1 5'47" y 0 3 43" ) O �' cy 610. 7 ' MIN FF. MIN FF. 1I I m
R=865.00 f 8.1p ' `" a� 18R 0 19R N b10.7 0 610.7 ;; i� WESTERRA TIMARRON, P.
68 �q 1158a SF ^� ^� 21 R DETAIL "A'
T=47.32 \ W/� N DE S 8 09 C 11174 sF o 20Rr ' N O99U.E - �j I VOL. 12612, PAGE 1 631
1106114 `i -� D.R.T.C.T.
F 4 39' 8j. BLOCK O V•9955 P.303 , w
LC= 9,4. 51 6 7 '� �' _ _ �" 60 � 55 I I
CB=N 55'46 05 W ,LOT 22 `� COMMON - 89'06 88 07 cn i S 00'25'05" E
' GREEN 58 5 84'22'56" E 134.52 125.00
N 52'38'11" W ----- `� - -- -- --- -----S 88'09'36 E T\
95.92 .' I �' - _ _ _ - -
66 7.5' U.E. F- - - N�89'26 44 W - 431.04 -
��, i A I 10' U.E.
/ D 36'48'33" 65 i\ 6.69
R=185.00 ' o i i � -
TIMARRON ADDITION _ 64 , l 0 63 6:. 61 E 59
BRENWYCK PHASE 2 LT=61.85 , N i is LIMITS OF
CAB. A, SLD. 2152 T=61.56 r I 100 YEAR FLOODWAY ` \�
P.R.T.C.T. ,� 82 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW) �\ \
CB=N 71'02 28 W
---- - --
ASHLEIGH LANE (50' R.O.W.)
BOUNDARY LINE DATA
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
19
S 27'46'04" F
35.22
BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
TANGENT
BEARING
CHORD
C22
1733'08"
1000.00
306.34
154.38
S 80'40'10" E
305.15
C23
28' 19'20"
50.00
24.72
12.62
N 76'23'36" E
24.46
LEGEND:
CG
COMMON GREEN
CIRF
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND
IRF
IRON ROD FOUND
CIRS
CAPPED IRON ROD SET
BL
BUILDING LINE
UE
UTILITY EASEMENT
DE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
D&UE
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
MIN FF.
MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
®
10' X 10' UTILITY EASEMENT
VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT
®
20' X 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
EASEMENT LINE
DATA
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
EL1
N
88'09'36"
W
134.52
EL2
N
84'22'56"
W
177.12
EL3
N
74'39' 17"
W
165.69
EL4
N
69'03'43"
W
234.29
EL5
S
18*06'24"
W
20.52
EL6
N
05' 15' 14"
E
26.88
EL7
N
09'43'27"
E
35.01
EL8
N
14' 1 1 '40"
E
43.65
EL9
N
18'06'24"
E
67.95
EL10
N
18'06'24"
E
76.99
EL11
N
18*06'24"
E
61.84
EL12
N
18*06'24"
E
38.56
EL13
S
19'00'05"
E
154.65
EL14
S
03'36'32"
E
201.89
EL15
S
18'44'06"
E
30.49
EL16
N
56'37'24"
W
33.91
EL17
N
52'51'11"
W
40.81
EL18rN
35'24'41
E
38.7t
FLOOD
LINE DATA
IINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
FL1
N
71'38'25"
W
12.44
FL2
N
40'52'58"
W
21.19
FL3
N
28'41'17"
W
16.69
FL4
S
86'55'03"
W
3.87
FL5
S
10'01'10"
W
7.89
FL6
S
16*52'31"
W
12.96
FL7
S
11'35'36"
E
68.93
FL8
S
0707'40"
E
47.78
FL9
S
03'45'56"
E
32.24
FL10
S
62'27'23"
W
10.98
FL11
N
8743'22"
W
53.98
FL12
N
78'02'57"
W
56.57
FL 1 3
N
87' 1 4' 1 7"
W
26.09
FLOOD
LINE DATA
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
FL14
S
89'23'30"
W
44.80
FL15
N
83'27'24"
W
23.86
FL16
N
70'01'49"
W
21.77
FL17
S
65'13'31"
W
7.92
F1_18
N
37'33'33"
W
22.53
FL19
S
47'02'24"
E
16.75
FL20
S
76'37'14"
E
10.25
FL21
S
86'56'32"
E
19.93
FL22
S
74'37'18"
E
30.59
FL23
S
78'32'55"
E
71.62
FL24
S
04'02'18"
W
47.75
FL25
S
00' 12' 14"
E
79.50
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
WHEREAS WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TIMARRON LAND
CORPORATION), ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED IT'S DULY AUTHORIZED
AGENT IS THE SOLE OWNER OF A 2.880 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE O.W.
KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING ALL OF LOTS
14 THROUGH 21, BLOCK 55 AND A VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF THE FINAL
PLAT OF TIMARRON ADDITION, BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, RECORDED IN CABINET A,
SLIDE 3444 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R.T.C.T.). SAID
2.880 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 13, BLOCK 55 OF SAID TIMARRON ADDITION, BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE
ONE, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14, BLOCK 55, AND
BEING IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) LINE OF SAXON TRAIL (50' R.O.W.),
RECORDED BY SAID FINAL PLAT;
THENCE ALONG SAID R.O.W. LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
S 71'53'36" E, A DISTANCE OF 321.74 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE
OF 17'33'08", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S 80'40'10" E A DISTANCE OF
305.15 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 306.34 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE
OF 28719'20", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 76'23'36" E A DISTANCE OF
24.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.72 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 21, BLOCK 55, SAID POINT BEING IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, BLOCK 55 AND SAID DRAINAGE
EASEMENT, BEING THE COMMON EAST LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT, THE FOLLOWING TWO
(2) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
S 27'46'04" E, A DISTANCE OF 35.22 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
S 00'25'05" E, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID FINAL PLAT AND SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT AND OF SAID DRAINAGE
EASEMENT, BEING THE COMMON NORTH LINE OF TIMARRON ADDITION, BRENWYCK
PHASE 2, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE
2152, P.R.T.C.T., THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
N 89'26'44" W. A DISTANCE OF 431.04 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 185.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE
OF 36'48'33", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 71-02-287 w A DISTANCE OF
116.82 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.85 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
N 52*38'11" W, A DISTANCE OF 95.92 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER;
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 865.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE
OF 0615'47", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 55'46'05" W A DISTANCE OF
94.51 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 94.55 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK
55, SAID POINT BEING THE MOST WESTERLY SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
DRAINAGE EASEMENT;
THENCE N 18'06'24" E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK 55, BEING THE
COMMON WEST LINE OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND SAID LOT 14, BLOCK 55, A
DISTANCE OF 154.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 2.880 ACRES
OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
ZONING COMMISSION
DATE
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE
CITY SECRETARY
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P., ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED IT'S DULY
AUTHORIZED AGENT, DOES HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAT REVISION DESIGNATING THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY AS LOTS 14R THRU 21 R, BLOCK 55 AND COMMON GREEN 58, TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON
SQUARE, PHASE ONE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND I (WE) DO
HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC'S USE THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN THEREON.
WITNESS MY (OUR) HAND(S) AT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THIS THE ____ DAY OF_________
1997.
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P.
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS,
ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED STEVE YETTS, AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR WESTERRA
TIMARRON, L.P., KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED
FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED, AND IN THE CAPACITY
THEREIN STATED, AND AS THE ACT AND DEED OF WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS ------- DAY OF___________
1997,
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS
JERRY L. FULLER
it,:te MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
August 5, 2001
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
I, GARY S. VEDRO REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF
TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION PLAT SHOWN HEREON ACCURATELY
REPRESENTS THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS DETERMINED BY A SURVEY MADE ON THE
GROUND, UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, AND 5/8 INCH IRON RODS CAPPED
"CARTER & BURGESS" HAVE BEEN SET AT ALL SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY CORNERS AND
UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, AT POINTS OF CURVE ALONG DEDICATED RIGHTS -
OF -WAY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE MONUMENTS OR MARKS SET, OR FOUND, ARE
SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE RETRACTMENT.
DATED
RP-VIP'\A/ Alvin rnnAnA�:_nlT
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
NUMBER 4934
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY of
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ON
THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED GARY S. VEDRO, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE
WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS DAY OF______________
1997.
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
PLAT REVISION NOTE:
THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT REVISION IS THE FOLLOWING:
1.) ADJUST THE SOUTH LOT LINE OF LOTS 14 THRU 21, BLOCK 55.
2.) DESIGNATE AREA SOUTH OF REVISED SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 14 THRU 21, BLOCK 55, AS COMMON
COMMON GREEN 58.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
1.) ALL CORNERS ARE 5/8" IRON RODS CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
2.) BEARING BASIS IS THE SOUTH LINE OF TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, AS
RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 3444, P.R.T.C.T.
3.) B.M. DISC AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BOX CULVERT 10.5' SOUTH OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD
1300' t EAST OF HIGHLAND OAKS CIRCLE STAMPED TARRANT COUNTY ELEV.=606.87.
DEVELOPER'S NOTES:
1.) THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR
ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS
ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE PLAT
IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS OTHER THAN THOSE
SHOWN, MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA.
2.) ALL COMMON GREEN AREAS ARE TO BE PRIVATE COMMON AREAS DEDICATED TO AND
MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
3.) ALL LOTS WITH THIS PLAT ARE SUBJECT TO TIMARRON PHASE 5, DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
4.) ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE REMOVED.
5.) SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A
VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING
OF UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS.
A
PLAT REVISION
OF
LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55
AND COMMON GREEN 58
TIMARRON ADDITION
BRYSON SQUARE
PHASE ONE
OUT OF THE
O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899
IN THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
,J3 8 RESIDENTIAL LOTS / 1 COMMON GREEN
2.880 ACRES
OWNER DEVELOPER: WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P.
7605 VIRGINIA PARKWAY
McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070
(972) 529-5988
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
CEOA=- Carter Burgess
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250
DALLAS, TX 75247-4961
(214) 638-0145
Z Ld
N0 af
of Q
� t
0
d' •
(0
CL Lf�N/
W
0
Ld
C)
Z
LLJ
Q
THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET
Fil F Nn.
MAY 1997
Tue May 27 14:15:36 1997
n-\ IOP\ TIAAARRON\ QF771C1(li\ (DA\ -)inDIDAn1
ea9�
649- —
r
1
0
Owner: Christ
Men's Netwc
Vol.
Pg.
Zoning. S-P
LUD: Mixed 1
4
t1
Own Countryside
ible Church
Zoning: CS
Public/Semi-public
/
Fie Hydrant /
/
I
Owner: A.J. Posey
Vol. 5064
Pg. 365 0
Zoning: AG
LUD: Low Density Residential
Site Plan
b
SITE PLAN APPLICATION F. J I 1irVN14.A
n � ,
/ Fire . ydrant
/ b for 2935 Everest Lane North
i
I �•a,
Plymouth,Minnesota 55447
E—Mail:
Voice: (612) 476-4133CHPIS�IAN MEN'SNETWORK Fax/Data: (612) 404-9317
1 / Owner's Representative:
e / � ' Integrity Development
o<�v / Jim Halek
/
Lot 2R1, Block B 14869 Manitou Road
Ravenaux Village Prior Lake, Minnesota 553
72
e Phone: 612.440.3 O
An Addition to the City of
8' High / Consultant:
Monument S 0 u t h l a k e
Sim / Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706
/
,92f-0" �.6• � t '' 10, Tarrant County, Texas
July 1996
1P 00
3.97 Acres
Site Plan for SP1 Zoning for Christian Men's Network Certifications:
Request for Variance to Delete Requirement for 6'-0" High
weer: Lee d Fence Along South and Portion of East Property Line
oning: OV
LU . Mixe"se
a, / owner: Owner's Representative: Architect: Surveyor:
Owner: Christian Men's Network Integrity Development ArchTech, Ltd. Ward Surveying Company
253
Grass I �i /' 1001 West Euless Blvd., Suite 104 14869 Manitou Road Plymouth
Everest Lane P.O. Box h TX
i Plymouth MN 55447 Fort Worth TX 78118
I+ / i Euless TX 76040 Prior Lake MN 55372
y: (817) 283-2898 (612) 440-3000 18121 478.4133 t8171 281-5411
Future 64
Parkin)y' /
Owner: A.J. Posey /
Vol. 8797
Pg. 353
Zoning: AG
LUD: Low Density Residential
Scale: V=30'-0"
R
FA
Site Data Summary Chart
dRo
/ Phase 1
Topic Existing
i
8-P-1
8-P-1
11 Zoning 2) Acreage 3.98 3.97 LIJ NCO
3 Lots 1 1
loe
/ 1
4) Building Coverage 0% 4.43%
— GAA 51 Development Schedule N/A 1996
/ a) Loading Required N/A 0 Berth
7) Loading Provided N/A 1 Berth
8) Parking Required N/A 30 stalls
i 91 Parking Provided N/A 30 Stalls
Standard Stalls N/A 28 Stalls
/ Disabled Stalls N/A 2 Stalls z 0
10) Open Space (Areal 172,738 93. 164,847 s.f. 1�
� 111 Open Space IXI 100X 95.58X �
/ / , 6 121 Building Data 1<
1 Story
a► Height (Stories) 0
b) Height (Feet) 0 20'-0"
644 c) Floor Area 0 7,650 s.f.
131 Uses -
Owner: al Office 7,850 s.f.
� E.J. Bryant bl Recording Studio 0 s.f.
� Vol. 18
Pg. 380 cl Chapel/Training 0 s.f.
Zoning: AG
L.U.D.: Mixed Use
loll
h
14) Sufferyard Chart Canopy Accent ALA
3 Bufferyard Required Provided Trees trees Shrubs
n None 10'-A 43) -(el 423) 0
say North - 286
c East - 219' S'-A 10'-D 2181 41111 181331
' c East - 315.5' S'-A 20'-Fix 3171 e051 25(20)
' South - 380' 10'-C 20'-F1x 11(10) 1808) 44(38)
20 -Ftx 14f111 151181 581321
8a6 West - 4l14' 10'-C
' Proposed Plantings in Parenthesis t 1, x : Required Plants Reduced by 20% for 20" Sufferyard Width
131
' Required Interior Landscape Plantings Canopy Accent
Bide Yard Sufferyard Trees trees Shrubs Groundcover
�T Phase I Area Req'd. = 2,295 s.f. M1 4 8 38 230 s.f. Protect No.: 95050
Date: zu " " 19115
Prepared By: July
Bufferya er Reviewed BY: sPB
b� File Name: No
i' l Script:
Drainage &
Utility Easement Location Map General Notes Revisions:
N4P1. Parking area and drives shall be paved with aspha;tic concrete (bituminous) surfacing
2. Building and parking security lighting shall be provided in conformance with the ordinance
• and shall be equipped with cut-off shields to prevent glare from extending beyond
.l► property lines. Pole mounted lighting shall be maximum 20'-0" poles.
3. Walls and fences shall be constructed in conformance with the ordinance. Sheet Title
4. No exterior storage of goods, products, or materials is permitted.
5. No exiting driveway or street intersection R.O. W.'s located within 100'-0" Site Plan for S P 1
Ravenaux of proposed deiveway.
ODr. a 6. sP ZoningIs based on all requirements of C8 Zoning District except as amended. Zoning for Christian
v
e 7. Benchmark El. = 842.28' NGVD: Railroad sppce in 12" an tree 150' south 8 100'+/- west Men's Network
of the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block A, Ravenaux VNlage.
O Project Sheet Number
s. Site 8. No External Auditory Devices are intended to be utilized with the exception of Emergency
= Alarm Devices.
Highland
2 5' 50' 75' 10 0' i 1-
AGAPE AREAS
Q rARDs
WCES s EXITS
I'LD/NGS
'cI C
APPIEC
>IGAPPEO
i SPACES
jw NTEO N1C*4
j�r I ar r-(.4TJOly`
GQPT,
?4?5 E Southlaks t31vd Suits 150
5outhlake, Texas 76092
TeL (0/'7) 4W - 4?00
Fox, (0/7) 4M-5?57
Q
-� TUILN r-yxTlr'=r A-D PARM&M
?425 E. South/aks Blvd., Suite /5®
,;outhiake. Texas '6092
rel.: (017,14M-4200
da DESCRIPTION
T FASTER SURYEr Abstract No. 474, situated about 17
4& degrees east from the courthouse " Fort Worth, the
Ot of Tarrant county, Texast and embracing a portion or
acres tract doocrribed in the deed to R-G- Lyford
y PaCounty
In volume
t0?a
nd s particular descrbedasoowa Deed
at a 5/8' Iron set for the southwest corner of the tract
9In voiuMe
e 1602 o� to ths State of, Texas said, Dsed eac-ords in he recorded line Of the
Mew NOM NOW pow NOW
- , ,.
i
P1l7rO�i► , ry ,, . ♦ rPOW
DEVICE
e
- --- ,
-- _
�.orwr+ yr r - • s Alkw
-- jaw b ro. OWN om
PHAM 11 - ll49WR LANDSCAM MOW CRAV
�,4M AMA f OF AMA N CAOoY A00W jQ00V�C0VM
(Sa OrU Flv�'w'r on S" rib it
EW
powwow
N� r „ 76/
CONSULTANTS
Architect Zvi 1
!AYES /NG. H�C
2045 N. Highway 360 sulte 0160 5701-C MiaWay Road
Grand Prairie, rx 75050 Ft. Worth, TX. 761/7
Tel.: (817> 640-ClOe Tel.: (017) 031-7711
Fax: (8/7l 633-3309 Fox: (Ol7l d311-6 "
•
•
h'
.1�• �L.�►A1M- b
MORM MMA7.11711V r 77
SITE DATA _
RLMSED SITE PLAN FOR
GEOROE TO" PARK
SOUTIRA CIF, TARRANT CO., TEXAS
PREPARATION DATE: 04/22/97
u MM ZONED: C-2 PROPOSED ZONING
C-2
LAND USE DESZGNATION� MIXED
_
— LM I p MAW H
E anV40 - P&M I
'DOTAL -_--
LAND AREA: 1310 A01 ES
57,4Jm �� F
l74i ACRES
75 840 5F
3.059 ACRES
L33,25m SF
PARKING MEOD: 3?
64
96
1�GPAI4�UNG Pl�VD: 33
67
At4ND/CAPPff0 Pis AMD: 2
3
/i/.vyllrnN�!-lam✓ /`loVGil--i�✓VDi 2
3 ill VAN
.4
TOTAL SPACES PROVD: 35
70
S/rE COVERAGE AREA: 5752 SF
21120 9F
26072 OF ---- -
517V COVERAGE PERCENrACsE: 101.E
?7B�i
20.2Z
PAVM46 AREA: fbM2 SF
30vpbi8 SF
47350 - -.---
PAVING PERCENTAGE: 29.4t
4C,4%
35.7*
203
ass
R to Z' r
AREA OF OPEN SPACE
34776 SF
24052 SF
5M26 5F
c7 t'
PERCENTAGE OPEN SPACE
60Ji�
3J
u
AMA OF OUTS/DE STORAW
O SG2 Fr
0 3Q f7:
O JQ
x OF Out5/DE STORAGE
O Sa FT.
08Q FT
®St2 FT
PI®OPl iED BLDG.
3F
KM7 9F
24IS3 OF
--
�.
MA45FR OF STORIES
2
1
400 acres tract.
N-1 BLDG. NE/GNt 37`-8'
puth 7P degrees-40 minutes-Ci seconds east along the
of the said State of Texas tract for the south right of
,f Southtake Boulevard, 337-60/100 feet to a 5/8' iron
1p southeast cOrr►er Ot he said State of Texas tract in
line or the 1-222/JCC0 acres tract described in the
the Clty Of g0uthiake recorded in volume BI06, page 1279
Id Deed Records.
;Vth, along the West line of the said 1-222/1000 acres
9-15/1®Z' feet to a 5/0' iron recovered for a reentrant
r the said 1-222/1000 acres tract
Guth $9 degrees-36 minutes West, along' a north line or the
2/1000 acres tract, IM � aid 1???to a , iron
�estract. for
Orly northwest corner' or
outh, along the west line of the said 1-222/~ acres
e Fast to a 5/8' ron recovered for the southwest corner
aid 1-222/10g@0 acres tract.
oath 89 degrees-36 minutes tweet along the south 11ne of
5/8' Iron set
---
Uw
-_
�... PRnP06ED FLOOR AREAS OFFICE USE OFFICE USE OFFICE.
s _
ANTIC/DATED CONST SCHEDULE MAY -eel
97 OCT. -96
74V1Ie0 acres tract. J38-6®'1,� e" .Fact.
►outhwest comes of ihre said - s� , ��' '�' s� 1 I
L �,
north no degrees -no minutes -53 seconds west, a /Ong the
t or the said 7-1®/I@0 acres tract 912-401Aee feet to
e or beginning and containing 5-434/10" acres,
w
g N
E
REVBE0 SITE PLAN
FM LOT- L BLOCK 4
GEORGEnOWN PARK
SCALE: 1' - 4C,-®'
m
d on t.- ground Novembeor 8. 1995.
220' l.AW rk PFd.4aE 4046 1.1G�U LARD E. GARR _W LOT J MOCK 1
i kff4 iT ;bL 809! PAGE 149C (APPROVED FINAL FLAT ' A u v M EAO&IR
woo PINCZ 10' L OR- Tic. � acC�se EAd�°B�lt;
I a' T sciQEt�rn B.�1e ryrE "' ZONED C3 - . -
ZONED AG• LAND USE pESIGN,ATION: MIXED 5 ft. LlE
uttOp rFr�r.� TIC.YV: MILD - - -- - - - -
MN6 A�DAcrc LAND USE DESIGNA
vier f MAP
-14
1709 _500kLAKE
W LOCKTM
.......,....._.._...._.._.._. _ _, __ _.. -- -- _. __ ._. __ __ ._ __- -- -- - -_ - -- -- --- -- - -- -- -- - -__, - - ----------- ----- --------__...__ __ _-.__.____ .. ________•-___---- -_ ~__-_-_--- _� --_: ;_". ____ _ -- -- -____ Jam/ -- -"
�I + d' HEIGHT STONE adaL1_ ' � � \� � !i ' � r G,4VALL/N0 hROPERTIES LTD.
12' x ii5' M46fl �\ r VOL. 1?I?3. PAGE ?18
RECEI-rAGLE �o
�a# rp4 rxA rV4 I ;
-! / ZGWEO C3
REW L. JAl•!E5 JR +I +
• I i , , T ► I # it gyp ,' ; l / L ANO USE DE.416 /OIJ: MIXED
�' LAND5G41'E � b , anew ,� -;.::. s,Rur � * '� � * l
�A JAMES t'rFE Fi aeio v ea - ---- * *
.9
4 AM LION
OAKS SUB0/V/S1ON + '
wry tAr PHASE „'_ 1
29 PAGE 39
21�1@ OFF%GET� DING 1_ ,/ l l ^® l STATE OF ItXAS
,A B' S1DB FARO IrAAr , ,•Ace..
a
tL
+ "� , t ,� DUlk r>#NG sEr SACK -----1 � ! VOL . 98®4,' PAGE 2061
DESIGNATION: LOW DENSi T l' ` _ , - + �0� - - - - - - - - - —
1- #73 rR
-----
w
� 6 LANDtIGAPE t - °' `II_- - - - - --t-'-"� --•� ih�
M.ti RES/pENTl.4L.TT1'L°
200"' SOUTH 200- 14' S Ord 00'20 W 1ER L IINE
5 LAN06CAM . •.. "` • . "'. ..•. ` 43989' S �d �?®' W
• •- B1j:FER * rrE 'A 25' FIIE LANE --- __. -. _. -- - _ - - - - - -- • l l
Ti S9d 4v \ \ P GE$ERAL. j4REA FC%R
1r
i I PROPOSED '23.19' EXJ$TlNG A WIDE EASE Gry / MQW B'NEN ,4l_ SIGN/ FOR
T FIDE 4YORAN76 Ur *r � r � \ `' l � P44M ll � ` t I L /BERr1' BANK
F/RE NYDRAN 5 so w,roE ccw-r rav /
C�CE99 W .
I urri iT' gAyEr�xr YOL /2???. PAGE' 1970
A
/ D.R T.C. T
ZONED C2
LAND USE DESIGNATION: MIXED
C/rY OF SOUTHLAKE CEOm3ffrOIIN L/MirED /4
�i
ht WILUAMS YOL- OhM PAGE 1605 ✓OL. 973®. PAGE /029 (�` 2 D�i rl�ia..i ` i
CS D.RtGT. LOT
I �i ZONED: G2
46E 1685 ZONED G5 LAND USE DE5/GNAT/ON: MIXED
i-ANO USE DE6iCsNA710N:
ESIGNAT/ON: LOW DENSITY i l
RESIDENTIAL
U.E.-----------------------------------------510E 1'ARpBUILDING PACK- - - CENTER 1. 06 -- - - t
• F - ----- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------
l_ - - - - - -_.._.._.._......._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._�lS99.75 I r
�...._... _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — -- —
\ NAME E. f CHARLOTTE J. EATCN
' STATE OF,'TEXAS
.r933b, PAGE mll3 D.RT.C.T.
ZONED AG
/ LAND USE DESI(5NATION: MIXED
EMIL Y 5NANKL /N ( .4[CsORDON .. NETTLETON l YOL. 6716 PAGE 764 I VOL. 3930, PAGE 117 / / R EGP D U U N 10 1997
ZONED AG I ZONED: AG
i LAND USE DESIGNATION: "'XED LAND USE DESiGN,4TiON: MIXED l /
-------------------
O M
L
<
x
Uj
< <
Ix
CL
a
o
< O
rg V
V `o
W
F-
IA
0
2
Z
I O
N
U
U
REVOM
5/7/97
iOB � • 9705
ME DATE
-- 4/72l'97— .
Marf Boo —
REVM 9M PLAN
Ka LOI• L MM 1.
a®ORGETM PAW
gFl Xr NO.
A-I
�o�. =r)ITnP- K.N. 10:34 4_v. 06,'09/9
DWG. FI _F SCALF: 1 "=40' PRN: ._.__ _. _ REC'V. CHKD:
(�v �.
(,,---- EXIST. CONTOUR
' w LINES TYP.
FUTURE LOT LINE
WITH AMENDMENT
TO PLAT 1/2"FIR
------------------------ --
If
' ' I
- o
O R.O. R.O.
— — — R.O.
� L -��- SPRINKLER VALVE _
CONTROL ROOM --
I BLDG. SETBACK LINE TYP -----_ ----
EXIST. — ----- _ - - _ _ ---- —
' BLDG. EMERGENCY EXITS- -
STRUCTURE - - _
;
_ PER TENANT SPACE N , T
(PHASE I ) / , I - REQUIRED BY CODE' TYP. PROPOSED NEW-
I� I o TAT
NOTE: DfO BUFF 'R- I , �i I N I o COMMERCIAL /
YARD REQUIREM T I I' I RETAIL BUILDING
I F.F. = 642.0'
DUE TO SHARED OSS j °-
I I� O 1 I ,' (1 STORY, 20'-0" HIGH
ACCESS / COMMO € T
F.F. = 643.0' 11,900 GROSS SQ. FT.) EL:642.0'
1 II
�10 FT DRAIN E S M T
--� a► i I I (/)-TYP. BLDG.
ENTRANCES - - --
I 1 1
j I I 1'-0" BLDG. STE
I it I
EL:(43.0' \
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ---- PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY �-
' (CONCRETE) o (CONCRETE)
• II I � I-
1 i o T P. E TRY
1 I P AZ A 6
L61.C EL 641.0 500
6 El H56'-0"C H
b
10-0" WIDE TYPE-F1
NOTE: CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT Q) LANDSCAPED BUFFER
REAR OF BLDG. PER U.B.0 /� YARD SHOWN SHADED
rr^^ STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY
EXITING: MIN. 44" WIDE TYP. S 880 5 7' 4 4'' E
------------------
REAR YARD l - -------------
EL-641.0'- - �y------
-Ifff"li __
o
VOL 11618 PG 1326 DRTCT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
ZONED AG AGRICULTURAL
LUD - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
- 753.77_ (314.03'
=- - - -- __N n�r--,
\ SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART
\ Estimated start of construction: 9-1-97
Estimated construction completion: 3-1-98
Existing Zoning: C-2 Local Retail / Commercail t--
NEB' -REES TYP. \'/2'1�IR EX1Stlnp�b L.U.D.: Medium Density Residential
\ , .�
. ` —\
�— -- ---- ----- --`---------.-'� ��;------------ Site Gross Acreage: 1.87 A: 81, 360 S.F.
--- - �\ 39
` S 240 :5g'"\ E
' . `� Site Net Acreage: 1.26 A: 54,875 S.F.
Required Interior Landscape Area = 50% of
� ufz�'SIR Bldg. G.S.F. .5(11,900) = 5,950 S.F.
\ \ \
Interior Landscape Area provided = 7,100 S.F.
TRASH PSTER REQUIRES .\9n
A N 8' 0" IGH, GATED MASO Y '� �� '\ \` \` \ Percentage of Site coverage: = 14.6%O
EA FREE NG. ALL, TO BE CON- �/`\
> W STRUC ED 0 A MATERIAL SIN. - '� `\� \� �, ` `, , `' \` Percentage of Pavement: = 36%
TO THAT OF HE PRIMARY STIR URE.'�``,�',, �, ' \ ' '`, Area of open ace unemcumbered = 64,460 S.F.
=22-56-11 p p ( )
`, \ •', ` .R _ 2 0 0 0' , ,
DU
T R
'� �'� �' _ ', \��' ` \ '�+ =10 8 C 9 i,% %% ', �`
Percentage of Open Space = 85.4%
,�,= .
,' " , - - ''', �`, �'`, R D B R G S 13'° �91'�,5'2 '��
Outside Storage: N/A , 0%
LINE 0
5 0 WIDE TYPE -A ,- , , ��, `
SCAPED \�UFFER - ' ``, C,R D D IS T 10 �, ',
Tota1 Building Area = 11,900 G.S.F.
CURB
YP.-
L ,- `
Y D SHOWN SHADED '
\
-- - ------ It`s i� �"--�` '` , �', '
All to be Local Retail Use
Total Floor Area = 11,900 G.S.F.
Parking spaces required: (1 /200) = 60
h05, _ 0
Al
EASEMEN
t i
Parking spaces provided = 77
Loading spaces required: = 1
I b )D ;� `t 1 _ _ -'�� 't `, �`, �t, 'ti
Loading spaces provided: = 1
:FAST . _ _
RESTA p t NEW CONTOUR t _
' I-z�y b" 30'I o'� I t i Nunmber of Stories 1 (20'-0")
' - 36,_0�� 20,t.01. 190'-0" ,/ D THRL� i _ - , , LINES TYP. ' ' ' — 3 - t I- I
rt - — - -- - VOL 11618 PG 1514 6f�T I I II , ' t
FOR I 1' ' _ - M 1709- SHADY OAKS LTD Q ll ► I Maximum Height — 5 0
1709 SHADY pAKS LTD., STRAT �I , I I o F ' I II
LAND INVESTMENT, INC. GENERAL ' `O ' 24' HIGH H.LD. POLE LIGHTS �i£R I 6 I I I t Il ' I' ! I ' 1 � � � '' 'ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COM CIAL h� I I � 11 PAR EL
PARTNERS, 8100 LOMA ALTO RD. ,'fFlfl. LANE ;I i +15'_ " I ,rT WITH SHOE BOX TYPE c� o/ 4 1 1 Ii I ? I } SIR Q
---- � ,_ - r- F 1 R E LANE I i t / 1
SUITE 2Q'8, DALLAS, TX, 75221 , 50 DII� EXT.IRAJ. IDE D. FIXTURES TYP.- - - _
-%" I 5b' Cis. EX1'. R � r 9
/ ' II , v ,
25 DIN INT. SET K.( -
I 1 6� v t Y - � �- 11 ,��, I,
-- — -•J--- —r--t ,!' DiA INT. AD.� 11 , I cn 1,
360 12 00 360 iDEG.
---- ,— — — --- --�-- I DEG. i0 12
12 - RAGE COVERAGE
CONIJECT TO EX ST.
I ' I ' 7.00'
a
INTERIOR ANDSCAPE
88 57'4E
8" WATER LINE TUB 5L, WN SHADEP
AND HAT�HED YP-
FOR ADJACENT o
PRO ERTY I (PHA E 1)
7 FT WIDE C =
/, V 1 ,= i I N ACCESS EMT
■ LIx1D - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL i ' o — BLDG. SETBACK LINE TYP
't -- -- -t 1--------------
--ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL I 18.5''I w i -
_ NATURAL SITE
10 FT DRAINAGE ES MT // /�_ 'I i I RAINAGE PATH
ED
1T0 E�SEME
h! 1 NEW MONUMENT
_ t / o
I, i u ,il, I�wO
t I � I _ _U �
t [ J (t " O f'- Ham-- '' � '' , '
'i Ii; II t ml �i�,j ,'a�W
to r I' I 1 W I IjH
PROPOSED VARIENCES SUMMARY CHART
1 • Building setback line: at North property line, change from 40'-0"
to 20' -0" to match setback line at Phase I of development.
2. Joint Access Easement for Parking spaces along the West
property line, Future amendment to Plat.
twIV) Lj,�i tj I1 co
a
i II D ,1 , I, , OU ,.
a' C� tom- --- --- --- ---�/ OI - I, Ir J 'i 1 ,' 0
l0- Y -- UN ,' ' T_
Uj
—TIE EXIST _
15'-0" DASHED LINES --r �
IN LDG. TYP. - I"' —REPRESENT I I ' t,, O
SIDE YD. FUTURE _
PARKING AREA --ALL WEATHER SET OUT PARCEL PLANNING- �i - ---- i- ; o ' J J
SURAFCE, ASPHHLT PAVING r} 1 ; ,' ; N , cL = a
( 70 -78 TOTAL SPACES) I I ; '� , ' { a D w
-- -631�O O tY
„ 1 i i NOTE LESS THEN '' I o0 tl Q
t 37 0 I I I I ,' 0.2: CTwO TENTHS) o
o III 1 LULJ- - - - o - _ - - --- - - -- ---1 -- ' I
(� 6 rn 6 37.5 OPOSED NEW 1 -- --- -----�-- t `--'- ' OF 1 F.C. (FOOT ', 't t -'
--- - , r O >_
/ z , ao - - l MOM-,kaESS s - , - - - I I - I 1 > H
— — - — -- — — — — — - I I o , "ENT o 1 ' CANDLE) OF I IG�iT U
j Q I i `� �' -- - - - - ---- D" WDIE UTILITY t
—�— I -00 O _ °-' --- - - - -- - - --------_-{1--- -
--r------------- ---- — II �. i'I , o' �_ �ff�,
j
1 , , NENT UTILITY
EXIST.
E :638 1 SIG TO B RE V i i o , 4 q t,C" 11 ' '
" H8 PROPERI�Y� LtNE 7YP 9.49 (358.15 )
--
' 235'-0" FRONTAGE
1 t----------'-------------i--
t oo tQ _ ' ' a i WILL BE MEASUR�D',
-- - ----- --}i - - --- - - - - -------�- +-, , 1
W r �! ' , AT THIS POINT `t '� `, ', ',� z
I , ,I
36 -0 EL'636.0' NEAREST I ,' ' '` ``\ `\ 't ', O
FIRE HYDRANT --�--� I--------•------------1
-- /2 F I 6 G , - I , , SET `\
EXISTING CURB Cut _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - 6 PROPOSED NEW "RIGHT TURN '
(CONCRETE APR N) ' \ - - - - - '-- __---NEw TREES AS - - - _
FROM PHASE I REQUIRED TYP. - _ _ _ - - _ _ ONLY'.' COMMON ACCESS I - ,� , +/- 330' _0" '
- _ - - (� - - - - -� - - i' CURB CUT CONCRETE) - - TOSBICENTENNIAL UPARK
20 0 WIDE TYPE-0 _ _ -
i R�� - LANDSCAPED BUFFER- - -
------ YARD SHOWN SHADED ---- I --- •---- ---
------------ ...... ...... ..... - - �•�--_---- --- .... .... _....... ------------------- ------ - r- _�__ _` �..._ _ ... . -
------------------------------- ------ I ---- --- 3=3.;R:C
�-
\--- I ----- --------- - - - - -- -- --_- -
EXIST. S.S. INLET-
' TO BE RELOCATED --� I - - - - _
T - ---_-- 195'-0" OWNER:
- ✓
SU14INIARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS------------___- ---- 255 0 -
- 1709 SOUTHLAKE OAKS• LTD.
TO CENTEREINE OF SHADY OAKS DRIVE Buffcryard Canopy Accent SRrjr s Fence / Screening
38 -0
■ -- Location . ` Length Width - Type Tress Trees Height & t,iaterialBy: Sandler Southwest Corp.
` Required 10' - F I 6' wood Sockadc, FM HIGHWAY 1709(S0UTHLA1T<C_,_E0 BLVD.) 1�soo Dallas Parkway Su><te 150
North R q "
5 -% t _P Finished Side to NnrLh- ( ASPHALT PAVEMENT W/ CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, 90'-0" WIDE ) , _ - Dallas, Texas 75248 '
` - - " - - 972-250-0008 Fax; 972-250-1950
Provided• Z 3r� �o -P/ -7 14 2 8 AS �P'o
- LITTL:=BERRY-G:-HAL-L--SURVEY ABS NO. 686
0 0 _ 3�, OS', 9 e O O O - ------ O O O O O O
SUMMARY CHART - IN ERIORLANDSCAPE Provided" /a�' %,�'f_a S z9 ,(CIA HIR "-' CRANBERRY SURVEY, ABS N0. 581
South - Required
Z 35-r
20'-0
/0
-5
none
Required or
Provided
Landscape Area
(Sq. ft.)
'o of area in
front or side
Cano
y Trees Accent Trees
Shrubs Ground Cover
(Sq. Ft)
Prodded'
all #
Zp'�p� p
/�
-7
33
Required"
6-, 95v
$"D?o
O 20
/00 Sys
licit Required
23S "
10' B
71
f
/9
none
Provided
-7, Job
&
/
ZV
i /UO
Provided*
142
/�j_D,r
4
J
J%
111A —
'Note any credits used in calculations:
a.
'Note any cttdits tried in calculations:�
- G%�JrrrloT Y�
a �4A9r I'���J� 1 j`Url" rr
b a .. - "
$,.cT�/
, „
137 -D
r
235 -Lr,
17
.•
.
r a
r•
'
! rI
rr
Oth rnents
I. A7
frSLv,,-c
II �ED�A
D{CAT
RON3
1 \Vhere parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrobs obtain g a
mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30")
on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas.
2.4�<<cR>=rP 3r1P�O y YX�E j }r 5f'ir"l�r �l-0�/� t�NE/jh/TE?s W'cY '%�
Af /X lL�t $� • .? 41t�PBt S`a 4 �� of M�.t/• S/ Zt .
VOL 7695 PG 1366
LAM CONNER
ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
BENCHMARK:
RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE AT NORTHEST
CORNER OF F.M. 1709 AND SHADY OAKS ROAD
ELEVATION 650.34
STATE OF TEXAS ROW
Preliminary Site Development Plan
SCALE: I" = 20'-0" a ro 15 20 30 40 eo
SCALE IN FEET
APPLICANT* -
1709 SOU -MAKE OAKS, LTD.
F9r Information contact: Mr. Neal Cukerbaum
it Sandler Southwest Corp.
16800 Dallas Parkway Suite 150
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-250-0008 Fax. 972-250-1950
VOL 10361 PG 1986
STATE OF TEXAS
ROW DEDICATION
37'-011
I
©1997 James, Horwick-Partners, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
All materials embodied herein
constitute an original work by the
Architect: the Architect owns all
copyrights herein. The viewer may
W not reproduce, display or distribute
this work or prepare derivative
,w7 works based on this work without
the express written consent of
\A\�\ the copyright owner.
V
o �
of
■
O
o
U
O
O
C^
IZ
■
O
-P
1(W
IJ
I
I
I
j O VOL 11618 PG 1514
FM 1709- SHADY OAKS LTD
02 ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
SITE LOCATION MAP
t tt !
r�
elm ..-T.
�tgo`w4 3 0
' , y ICITY W4
! �,
P.A.
$ I YI LLA6tt uH
O
I;
J
It + Writ C0111MOMTA01 M1Q CM(TrYRUMn1f. Oli —
+COLL.E�f WIY.t.IE` Z
- - VOL 6765 PG 805
RICHARD REUTILINGER
ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
■
TM
Architects
James, Harwiek+Partners, Inc.
8340 Meadow Road Suite 248
Dallas, Texas 75231
Telephone (214) 363-5687
Fax (214) 363-9563
Project Nmnber
97031
Dra" By
DDT
Date
04-28-97
Revision Number
Date
Resubmit Number 1
06-09-97
CASEN0..- ZA-97 0S8
Drawrag Number
A101���
■
■
u
i ticuiation Evaluation No.I
No. ZA 97-058 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97
Elevations for Southlake Oaks Ph. 11, Lot 2, Block I of 1709 Sot=thlake Oaks
Received 4/28/97
Front - facing:
South Wail ht. =
20
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta
Max. wall length
60 50
-17%
Yes
60 19
-68%
Min. artic. offset
3 5
67%
Yes
3 3
000
Min. artic. length
13 16
23%
Yes
5 13
160°/o
Rear - facing
■
Max. wall length
Min. artic. offset
Min. antic. length
Right - facing:
Max. wall length
Min. artic. offset
Min. antic. length
Left - facing:
Max. wall length
Min. artic. offset
Min. artic. length
■
(V
I I
i I
WEST ELEVATION
VLr _
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
Yes
Yes I I
Yes
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/16" =1'-U"
North Wall ht =
20
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta OkayU
60 50
-17%
Yes
60
50
-17% Yes
3 4
33%
Yes.
3
3
0% Yes
13 13
0%
Yes
13
13
0% Yes
9
East Wall ht. =
20
Iorizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
I
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta Okay?
j
60 33
-45%
Yes
60
46
-23°.0 Yes
3 4
33%
Yes
3
3
0% Yes
I
8 13
63%
Yes
12
13
8% Yes
j
I
West Wall lit. =
20
j
Iorizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
j
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta Okay?
60 33
-45%
Yes
60
46
-23% Yes
3 4
33%
Yes
3
3
0% Yes
8 13
63°0
Yes
12
13
8% Yes
j
T�, OP OF PARAPET
'
ELL.-23—' -4"
TOP OF STEEL
---
---- - -
---- .. _ ---
EL.-21'-8"
'
I
TOP OF PARAPET
_
Oil
TOP OF STEEL
.. i.--.----
EL.18'-4"
'
I
WINDOW HEAD
EL.:16'-O'
-.. _ . _
_ . - . .
- --
... ..........
_...
E
L3
r
TOP OF PARAPET
EL.:15'-0"
I
TOP OF STEEL
-,
T EL. : 13' - 4"
,--�-,-- --� rr- �i
r =i r -- r -
,gkTOP OF OPENING
,gkTOP OF COURSE
Enlarged Elevation
la -
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
R)
N
GRADE BM., PTD.
I I I I I I
,---.{-----------------r---------
03 SOUTH ELEVATION
6 5
TOWER BEYOND -- - - -
BRICK SOLDIER CRS.
OVERFLOW SCUPPER
I TYP. a 5, 6" H.V. 12" W.
;DOOR AND FRAME
!AS PER SCHEDULE
I
t —
13 NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: I /Ib" =1'-0"
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
EE
I I
190'-01, ------ -----
I
I
PREFORMED, PREFIN. MTL ROOFING !
OVER 2 LAYERS BLDG FELT, OVER
ROSIN SLIP SHEET OVER 5/e" TREATED
PLYWOOD SHEATHING ------
190' -01,
3
BRICK SOLDIER CRS.
FACE BRICK ON
BITUMINOUS DAMP -
PROOFING ON 8" CMU
I
FACE BRICK TYP.
-- ---- PLASTER FINISH OVER
/Z" GYP. SHEATHING
OVER 8" CMU
TOP OF RIDGE LINE �
EL.:35'-O"
i
CENTERLINE OF
I STL PIPE COL
RE: STRUCTURAL
PREFORMED MTL FASCIA
�TOP OF STL.
EL.:28'-4"
! PBREAK REFIN MTL CLOSURE,
I GLAZED ALUMINUM
FRAME SYSTEM,
PREFIN TOP OF STEEL
i ._. EL.:23'-4"
BRICK SOLDIER CRS.
FACE BRICK WITH
ANCHORS AT TOP OF PARAPET
16"..0,C.. E.W.
EL.:20'-O"
BRICK SOLDIER CRS. TOP OF STEEL
GLAZED ALUMINUM EL.:18'-2"
FRAME SYSTEM,
PREFIN EL.=16'-O" WIN. HD.
BREAK MTL CLOSURE, EL. 15'-0" T. 0. P.
PREFIN TOP P OF STEEL
EL.:13'-2"
PRECAST CONC. LINTEL
OPENING HEAD
-- - --- FACE BRICK ON --
BITUMINOUS DAMP- EL.10'-0"
PROOFING ON 8" CMU
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, PREFIN
DOOR AND FRAME PER SCHED
BRICK SOLDIER CRS. TOP OF COURSE
EL.:3'-6"
I ' ;
I
I ! ,
j I
©1997 James, Harwick+Partners, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
All materials embodied herein
constitute an original work by the
Architect: the Architect owns all
copyrights herein. The viewer may
not reproduce, display or distribute
this work or prepare derivative
works based on this work without
the express written consent of
the copyright owner.
o �
a� c�
r,
QU
O
Cz
O c�
0
C)*ftaIL:ci
con
■
JH+ ID)
Architects
James, Harwick+Partners, Inc.
8340 Meadow Road Suite 248
Dallas, Texas 75231
Telephone (214) 363-5687
Fax (214) 363-9563
■
Project Nmnber
9703
Dralm By
DD
Dote
04-28-9
Reksim Number
Dd
Resubmit Number 1
06-09-9
CASENO - ZA-97 D.S
DrawingNx*r
A401
