The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-06-17 CC Packet city managerreport s re ort ig SPIN 2► 601,141 June 13, 1997 1997 Business Needs City Council Action t Survey Highlights June 17, 1997 The following items will be addressed at the • ' The needs survey was designed regular City Council meeting on June 17, to obtain information, opinions 1997. and concerns from a broad Consent Agenda: spectrum of businesses in 1) Request to advertise for bids for a 5 million gallon tank located 2,700' north of Southlake. A total of 225 Kirkwood Boulevard on the east side of T.W.King Road. usable survey instruments were 2) Authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction returned from the 608 for the installation of a 20" water main on East Southlake Boulevard. 3) Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for professional businesses for a 37% response services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II. rate. 4) Addendum to Cheatham&Associates' contract for professional services to include Phase II design of Bob Jones Park to include parking lots, drives, irrigation, Survey results indicate that landscaping, and other park improvements. Southlake is a good place to do 5) Requests to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park, Phase I. 6) Excuse the absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two consecutive business. Overall, 93.5 Council meetings. percent of respondents icated they are pleased with Regular Agenda:: Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, related items: ....it existing Southlake 1) Ord. No. 480-245 Rezoning, S-P-2, Miron Addition (#8) operation. In comparison to 2) Ord. No. 480-Y Establishing regulations for personal care facilities 3) Ord. No. 483-G Subdivision Ordinance respondents of the 1995 4) Ord No. 483-F Amending Ord. No. 483, revising Article VII, Park and survey, a lesser percentage Recreation Dedication Requirements anticipate moving their 5) Ord. No. 480-222 Rezoning/Concept Plan for Timarron Commercial Tract III business out of Southlake or (#4, #5, #6) downsizing, and a greater 6) ZA 97-056 Development Plan of Timarron Village J (#9) 7) ZA 97-057 Preliminary Plat of Timarron Village J (#9) percentage plan to expand. 8) ZA 97-063 Plat Revision for Timarron Addition Bryson Square Phase I located Approximately one-third of on the south side of the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon Trail (#13) Southlake businesses are home- 9) ZA 97-053 Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network, (#11) based. 10) ZA 97-054 Site Plan for Georgetown Park Phase II (#7) 11) ZA 97-058 Site Plan of Southlake Oaks Phase II located on the north side of 1709 and 410' east of the intersection of Shady Oaks and 1709 (#13) Respondents indicated the most important factors adversely Ordinances, first readings, and related items: impacting their Southlake 1) Ord. No. 678 Annexing territory known as "Solana" operation are county and school 2) Ord. No. 679 Street name change from South Kimball Avenue to Crooked Lane Blvd, from the intersection of South Kimball Ave. and Crooked Lane Blvd. to East district taxes, zoning, and Continental Blvd. and a street name change for East Continental Blvd. to South municipal taxes. Kimball Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park. 97 percent indicated that Other Items for Consideration: ltactS with city staff had 1) Selection of a site for the new Joint City of Southlake/C.I.S.D. Administration Building :n courteous and their problem or request had been Other Items for discussion resolved. 1) A Joint Resolution of the City Council and CISD Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness. Scheduled Meetings • Eubanks Development June 16, 1997 ♦ Activity Park Development Corp. House This information is from a workir staff document. To confirm, call 6:00 p.m. Council Chamber Update 481-5581 ext. 744. SPIN#14, #9, #10 7:00 p.m. White Chapel Room Planning & Zoning-June 19 97-055 Zoning, Ken Smith prop. (#7) June 17, 1997 97-067 Preliminary Plat, Stonecrest Business Park (#7) City Council Meeting 97-074 Zoning, Solana Council Chamber The Senior Advisory 7:00 p.m. Commission and the city staff 97-075 Specific Use Permit, Solana 97-076 Specific Use Permit, Chili's June 19 1997 are proceeding with the 97-077 Specific Use Permit, La Scala Planning & Zoning renovation of the Eubank's 97-072 Final Plat, Kirkwood Hollow Council Chamber House as a Senior Activity Phase I (#2) Center. Engineering staff is 97-073 Final Plat, South Hollow (#8) 97-021 Zoning/Concept Plan, Timber preparing plans for the outside Lake Estates (#14) portion of the house including 97-061 Site Plan, Church of Christ Focus on SPIN #6 street access, parking, drainage (#15) and sewer connections. A 97-062 Plat Revision, Church of professional will be hired to Christ (#15) City Council Meeting -June 24 �► design the floor plans. Once 96-162 Concept Plan, Telesupport ISPIN2 plans are developed the East Campus (#8) el construction phase will move forward. SPIN #6 is an area bordered by Grapevine on the north and east sides, SH 114 on the south SPIN #14 and residential properties on Road Closing y� t the west, including Briarwood Developer Meeting STOP H Estates. This area has tree June 16 - 7:00 p.m. Pearson Lane lined streets and a blend of old White Chapel Room -_ Monday, June 16 "f and new development. 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Tom Ward is the SPIN #14 invites all Pearson Lane, just north of Representative for SPIN #6. interested residents to 1709 will be closed to all Tom is developing a subpage attend an informational traffic in order to resurface a meeting on the proposed section of the.road disturbed by on the city's web site to get Chapel Village residential news and information out on development at the north the placement of utility lines SPIN #6 issues. Residents with west corner of Continental associated with the construction e-mail can receive a monthly and White Chapel. The of the Pearson Pump station. newsletter. Please send a note development is for 19 SF-20 with your address to Tom at zoned residential lots on tward2481@aol.com. 11.5 acres. Please call Doug McKelvey 481-5581 ext. 894 You can visit our Web Site at: for more information http://www.ci.southlake.tx.u: • . City of Southlake, Texas • MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting June 17, 1997 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Request to Advertise for Bids for the Five Million Gallon Ground Storage Tank located 2.700 feet North of Kirkwood Boulevard on the East Side of T. W. King Road - We are ready to proceed with advertising for bids for the first phase of this project, the tank construction. Note that we are well ahead of the schedule in the CIP progress report. We had initially anticipated bidding this portion of the project out in October, but we have been able to get ahead of schedule on this item. Bids for the pump • station will be sought at a later date. Note in the Capital Projects Summary, handed out at the retreat, that we budgeted approximately $2.7 million in our CIP budget for this project, which will be funded by the certificates of obligation issued this year. Staff recommends that you approve our request to advertise for bids for this project. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B, Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order Number One with Wright Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along East Southlake Boulevard from South White Chapel Boulevard East to Miron Drive - While this project has been somewhat delayed due to problems with easement acquisition, there.has been activity on the project. This change order, which increases the project cost by $21,185, has been necessitated by the requirement to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway, as well as additional appurtenances. The memo from Bob Whitehead, and the attached change order dated May 16, 1997, describe the changes in detail. Staff recommends approval of Change Order Number One. . .. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 2 Concerning the easement, we believe we have reached an agreement with the property owners of the final needed easement. Mrs. Hayes has apparently agreed to provide the easement for $11,000 and permission to build a carport on her lot. A carport is permitted (as an accessory use when not attached to the house) under our zoning ordinance, so we can work with them to accommodate their needs within the parameters of our ordinances. We believe it is in the City's best interest to allow this so that we can move forward with this project. 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorizing_the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for professional services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II - This item was approved IIIby the SPDC at their June 9, 1997 meeting. Mesa was selected as the design team by a selection committee consisting of Councilmember Scott Martin, SPDC member Ronnie Kendall, Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation, and Sean Poe of our engineering staff. The Mesa Group will be designing the next phase of Bicentennial Park, which will include tennis courts and other park improvements. A copy of the contract approved by the SPDC is included in your packet. If you have any questions about the selection of Mesa, please feel free to call Scott Martin, Ronnie Kendall or Kim Lenoir. SPDC and staff recommend approval of this contract. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Addendum to Cheatham and Associates Contract for professional services to include Phase II design of Bob Jones Park, to include parking lots, drives. irrigation, landscaping and other park improvements - You will recall that the SPDC and City Council previously approved the original contract with Cheatham and Associates for the preparation of a grading plan, contour map and preliminary site report for the first illportion of Bob Jones Park. We are now moving to Phase II of this design work, which Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 3 will include the design of the parking lots, drives, irrigation and landscaping, and other park improvements. The contract in your packet documents the scope of services for Phase II work. Note that SPDC approved the addendum at their June 9 meeting. Staff recommends approval of this addendum. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Request to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park. Phase I - The grading plans for Bob Jones Park have been completed and a copy is included in your packet for review. The SPDC approved this plan and the budget for this initial portion of the Bob Jones Park work. These plans show the development of the pond, grading for the berm (most of the fill will be excavated from the pond), soccer fields and parking areas. Note that the master plan called for 11 soccer fields, but in reviewing the plans with the Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association, they requested smaller fields. • Thus, these plans show a total of 14 soccer fields. The proposed bidding schedule is included in your packet. Of course, we are working diligently to stay on our schedule for this project. It is our intention to advertise on June 22 and June 29, open bids on July 9, have SPDC award the bid on July 14, with City Council action to award the bid on July 15. All of these dates move us closer to having the fields ready for the Fall 1998 season. Staff recommends your approval of this request to advertise for bids. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Excuse of absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two consecutive Council meetings. This is on the agenda to enable Councilmember Muller to comply with the City Charter. With this meeting, Councilmember Muller will miss two consecutive regular meetings. The City Charter in Section 2.08(b) requires an elected official to forfeit office for failure "...to attend two consecutive regular meetings of the 0 Council without being excused by the Council." Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 4 7. Agenda Item No. 7A. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-245. ZA 97-035. Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Miron Addition. There have been no changes since Council approval of the first reacting 5-0. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Karen Gandy if you have any questions regarding this request. 8. Agenda Item No. 7B. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-Y. Establishing regulations for personal care facilities. There have been no changes in this proposed revision to the Zoning Ordinance since Council approval on the first reading by consent agenda (5-0). The memo from Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy points out the key provisions. There is one item you will want to clarify with our attorneys: Section 2 that allows personal care facilities with a SUP in the C-1 and C-2 districts. Normally, C-3 is cumulative of C-1 and • C-2, and by extension, 0-1. Does the fact that C-3 is not mentioned in the amendment restrict the SUP availability, and thus the use, only to C-1 and C-2? Is this what you would intend? It is my understanding that this is what P&Z intended. Feel free to contact Karen if you have any questions. 9. Agenda Item No. 7C. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 483-G. Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items). There have been only minor changes since Council approval of the first reading on consent agenda (5-0). Councilmember Harris recommended some wording changes and these changes have been made and are shown in the ordinance in a redline/strikeout format. Upon further review, staff found that there were also changes needed in sections 28 and 29 (pages 7C-9 and 7C-10). The changes reflected in redline/strikeout, show the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, which was incorrectly shown on the first reading draft. Feel free to contact Greg Last if you have any questions regarding this ordinance. • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council SAgenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 5 10. Agenda Item No. 7D. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 483-F, Amending Ordinance No. 483, Subdivision Ordinance, revising the entirety of Article VII, Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements. The draft attached to your memo reflects the changes recommended in the motion for approval on the first reading. Staff has also attempted to provide the data and related graphic representations that were requested during the first reading. The graphics show two alternative ratios for dedication in residential developments (i.e., 1:25 and 1:50 ratios). There are some issues related to this ordinance which we would like to have the city attorney discuss in executive session. Section 7.05 A.2.a. (Pg. 70-6) provides that the park dedication/park dedication fee would be based upon the equivalent cost of land in the subdivision being developed. Would this result in (differential) fees based on the S (differential) value of the land, with no correlation to the impact on parks? Does a person living on a lot valued at $10,000 have any more impact on the park system than a person living on a lot valued at $50,000? The attempt to get at this question was the reason for the present method (i.e. average land cost) of arriving at the park dedication fee. Section 7.06 (p70-7) deals with the issue of credits for private parks, differentiating between private and semi-public. Should there perhaps be some definition of what constitutes a semi-public park? Feel free to contact Chris Carpenter (ext. 866) if you have questions regarding the graphics and research, or Kim Lenoir if you have questions related to the desires of the Park Board. 11. Agenda Item No. 7E. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-222, ZA 96-132, Rezoning and IIIConcept Plan for Timarron Commercial, Tract III. The applicants have revised the • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 6 submittal to reflect the discussion during Council's approval of the first reading 6-0. Note that there are some areas where the applicant has proposed language as a solution to the general discussions held during the first reading. These areas are as follows: Page DR-13 Bottom two bullets. Page DR-14 Bottom bullet. Page after DR-15 New language in ( ) at top of sheet. Page DR-17 Bullets 3 and 4 at bottom of page. Page DR-18 First bullet Concept Plan Items referenced above are also included as notes on plan. • Feel free to contact Karen Gandy, Greg Last or Dennis Killough regarding this request. 12. Agenda Item No. 7F. ZA 97-056. Development Plan of Timarron Addition. Village J. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. Timarron is proposing two "Product Types" with this development plan, both of which have been developed in previous phases of the development. Product type "D", which has 19 lots, is a continuation of the "Golf Villa" concept east of this land area. Product type "A" is the same product type as previous phases (Glendover, Strathmore, Bent Creek) which are located south of Continental in three separate villages. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-0-1 subject to the Development Plan Review Summary. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy, Greg Last or Dennis Killough if you have any questions regarding this application. 13. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 97-057, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village J. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning • Commission recommended approval 4-0-1. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Greg Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 7 Last regarding this request. 14. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 97-063, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22. Block 55. Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One. This request apparently originates due to confusion generated with marketing brochures and sales efforts for lot sales in this area. Apparently some brochures generated by Timarron showed open space or tree cover in the rear of these lots and there was some belief by purchasers of the lots that this was open space not owned by individuals. Timarron is attempting to resolve the issue by actually creating a common area along the rear of these lots, thereby allowing the HOA to maintain the area. There are no technical issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-0- 1 subject to the Plat Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Greg Last • regarding this request. 15. Agenda Item No. 71. ZA 97-053, Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network. The purpose of this request is to eliminate the 6' wood fence along the south and majority of the east property lines. At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, several surrounding neighbors spoke in favor of deleting the requirement for the fence. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 subject to the Site Plan Review Summary. 16. Agenda Item No. 7J. ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II. This request is a continuation of the existing project along FM 1709 and proposes an additional building south of the existing buildings. There are no unresolved issues with this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0, accepting the building articulation as proposed. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions. • • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 8 17. Agenda Item No. 7K. ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II. This request is also a continuation of the project currently under construction. Note that this application is for the building east of the building currently under construction, as well as the easternmost drive; however, it does not include the pad site at the far east end of the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 with the modifications as noted in the staff report, as well as on individual items in the site plan review summary. 18. Agenda Item No.8A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No.678, an ordinance annexing the land known as Solana. This is the first reading of the second annexation proceedings. This may cause some confusion among the public and the media, however the procedure is IIIbeing followed to ensure the validity of the action. Specific details of the annexation proceedings and recent developments will be provided to you in Executive Session. You may have noticed that, in conformance with the City's zoning procedures, zoning signs were placed last week at the Solana office complex to alert interested parties of the City's intention to rezone the recently annexed property to the appropriate Non-residential Planned Unit Development (NR-PUD) district, as well as for the proposed Specific Use Permits for the sale of alcoholic beverages for the restaurant sites within the'complex. Questions regarding the procedure can be directed to Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, at ext. 743. 19. Agenda Item No. 8B, Ordinance No. 679, Street Name Change from South Kimball Avenue to Crooked Lane Boulevard for the portion of South Kimball Avenue from the IIIIntersection of South Kimball Avenue and Crooked Lane Boulevard to East Continental Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council iioAgenda Item Comments and Other Items • June 13, 1997 Page 9 Boulevard and a Street Name Change for East Continental Boulevard to South Kimball Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park - As discussed at the Retreat, the purpose of this item is to avoid anticipated confusion on these street names as we proceed with the extension of South Kimball Avenue through Heritage Industrial Park. The map attached to Bob Whitehead's memo clearly illustrates the need for this change. Note that three occupied properties have been identified which will be affected by this change: Pumpco, Texas School of Baseball, and Beech Overhead Door Company. 20. Agenda Item No. 10A. Selection of site for new joint City/CISD Administration Building. As you had suggested at the retreat, we are bringing this item forward for your consideration, in order for Council to make it clearly known to all the citizens which site has been selected for the new City Hall. • 21. Agenda Item No. 11A. Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent School District Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness. As noted in Community Services Coordinator Shelli Siemer's memO, there have been some changes made to the draft resolution presented at the retreat. She explains the changes and the reasons for them. It is our intent to bring this forward as a consider item at your next meeting on June 24 with any further changes you may have after this meeting. The CISD Board of Trustees will meet on Wednesday, June 25. It is anticipated they will have the resolution on their agenda as well. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 22. Water bill cycle change. Recall that we changed our billing cycle. Every customer has IIIbeen notified that our billing office is mailing bills today to those persons in the 2nd cycle. • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 10 This cycle included water usage from May and part of June. Persons affected live east of White Chapel Rd. You may receive phone calls from residents that have forgotten that their billing cycle was changing. The bill they receive in the middle of July will be for a 30-day period. 23. Monthly Financial Statements. The financial statements for May will be distributed at the meeting on Tuesday. This is due to the preparation for the June Retreat, FY 95-96 audit readjustments being recorded, and re-journalization of the general ledger since October. 24. IRL Race Weekend/Countryfest at the Texas Motor Speedway - Events at the Texas Motor Speedway continue to require attention from the Department of Public Safety, although not to the extent once anticipated. The recent IRL Indy Race and Truck Race weekend IIIproduced heavy traffic, but not to the point of having to fully implement our traffic management plan. In fact, only one officer worked overtime and the entire weekend was fairly uneventful. As you may know, Countryfest is scheduled for this upcoming weekend, with Rockfest scheduled for the following weekend. All traffic officers will be assigned special shifting patterns for that weekend. DPS is planning to supplement these officers with two or three additional police patrol officers, since these types of events will likely result in more "police" issues than traffic problems. 25. Bicentennial Park Selected Best in Greater Northeast Tarrant County - As mentioned at the Retreat, Bicentennial Park was highlighted in the Fort Worth Star Telegram as the "Best Park in Northeast Tarrant County," as selected by kids in the area. A copy of the article is attached in case you missed the article. 26. Park Board Meeting Highlights - Your packet contains the minutes from the June 9, 1997 110 Park Board meeting. The minutes are fairly detailed, however, there are a few highlights Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 11 worth pointing out: ✓A demonstration of the complaint tracking system was provided by Kevin Hugman. Using a computer and LCD projector, he showed the Board how our manual tracking system will be converted to an automated system. ✓The Board discussed the Recreation Liaisons/Staff review of Success Strategies: A Recreation Management Program. Items addressed were instructor hiring and management, customer satisfaction processes, class size and content determinations, safety, and revenue generation. ✓The Board reviewed a budget prioritization list and survey results, and compiled a list • of budget items for recommendation to the City Council. We hope you will take a moment to review the minutes. Also note that the SPDC approved the grading plans for Bob Jones Park, Phase I, approved an addendum to the contract with Cheatham and Associates for landscaping, irrigation, etc., and approved a contract with Mesa Design for engineering and design of Bicentennial Park expansion Phase II as noted in several of the consent agenda items. 27. Tree Preservation Ordinance Workgroup. The tree preservation ordinance workgroup has met three times and is progressing with discussions regarding the proposed draft from Keep Southlake Beautiful. Although there are several divergent opinions, healthy . discussions are bringing to light a variety of issues that could enhance the preservation of trees in the city. I am sure Councilmember Martin would welcome the opportunity to discuss the progress of the committee should you be interested. Greg Last has also • attended the meetings if you have questions and Councilmember Martin is unavailable. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council SAgenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 12 28. Telesupport. Mr. Jim Munday of Telesupport is working to resolve the questions presented by Council during review of his concept plan at the last meeting. We will be meeting with him in the next few days and will try to update you on progress at your meeting. Feel free to contact me or Greg Last if you have any questions. 29. New Park Planning and Construction Superintendent. Mr. Ben Henry has started this week in this position. Mr. Henry has a degree in landscape architecture and is a licensed irrigator. He comes to us from Dunaway and Associates where he worked for 7 years, performing site plan analysis and overseeing construction inspections. We have also selected a Landscape Administrator, who should begin employment with • Southlake in approximately a month. He must give his notice to his current employer and then he wants to take some vacation before starting here. He has an urban forestry background: we will provide you more information once he begins work. 30. CIP Progress Report. As requested at the retreat, Public Works staff will provide an updated status report of each capital improvements project in a narrative format beginning in July. It is our intent to provide this report to you at the first meeting of every month. 31. National Victims Assistance Academy. Community Services Officer Carrie Fullington has been chosen to attend the National Victim Assistance Academy, June 12-18, at the University of North Texas. The Academy accepted only 200 persons nationwide and only 50 from the southwest. Officer Fullington will gain knowledge of victims' rights and services and victim • assistance for a variety of crimes including: assault/robbery. child victims, domestic Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13. 1997 Page 13 violence, sexual assault, elderly crimes, drunk driving, hate/bias crimes, stalking victims, victims with disabilities, and workplace violence. This training will enable Officer Fullington to better serve the Department of Public Safety and the residents of Southlake. 32. Southlake In Review - Special Edition. The Public Information Office is editing the final draft of the community newsletter and will send it to the printer on June 17. It should be mailed to residents on June 24. 33. Newspaper Clippings. Per the comments made by Councilmembers at the retreat, III newspaper clippings will no longer be included in your packets. The Public Information Office retains copies of all newspaper articles related to the City of Southlake. They are available for your review at any time. If you would like copies of specific articles, please contact Tracy Southers at ext. 819. 34. TIF Update. Staff is continuing to develop a preliminary project and finance plan for the Tax Increment Finance Zone. We are working with Jim Sabonis, the City's financial advisor, on various scenarios for implementation of the TIF. At the June 24 City Council meeting, these will be presented for Council's consideration. At that time, staff will request Council to pass a resolution setting a public hearing on August 26, 1997 for the creation of the TIF. Once the resolution is passed, we will be meeting with the overlapping taxing entities to discuss their participation in the TIF. Another copy of the schedule we handed out at the retreat is attached. 35. Retreat Follow Up. Staff is compiling the information and suggestions provided by IPCouncil at the retreat. This information will be very beneficial as we begin the budget Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 14 process. For those of you who were unable to attend, a video recording of the proceedings will be available for your review. One piece of information that was not included in your retreat packet was the compilation of departmental accomplishments. We hope to have this information included in your packet for the June 24 meeting. As you would expect, there have been substantial developments in every department. Once we began putting this information together, we realized there were other things that needed to be added in order to be complete. 36. Update on Metro Pool Chemicals, Inc. We met this week with Mr. Meyers of Metro Pool Chemical to discuss the problems associated with the incompatibility of his use in the surrounding area and options for relocating his business. Mr. Meyers understands the • problems and is agreeable to working with the City to find a mutually acceptable solution. He is meeting with his advisors this week and will inform us soon of how he would like to proceed. 37. Note the attached letter from Barry Friedman referencing the May 21, 1997 Council Meeting and the vote on the TETCO Station. I am going to respond to his letter point-by- point. I hope to have this accomplished by Monday morning. (The situation was exacerbated by the P&Z's decision to ignore the advice of the attorney and vote to deny the site plan regardless of the statutory provision.) I will forward a copy of my response to you as soon as it is completed. 38. Note the attached letter from Jan Francis. It speaks for itself. 39. I will be out of the office most of Monday, meeting with our attorneys regarding the • Westlake lawsuits. Thus I will not be able to meet with you in the normally scheduled Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items June 13, 1997 Page 15 Monday afternoon briefings. The hearings will resume Friday June 20, at 2:00 p.m. Contrary to what you may have read, nothing has changed with where we are in the annexation process. • • . .. K . hsT OF GREATER NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY 1 ' g C i a , ."� ,i .1 1. Y T�1 0 .• . Oil �. 114110. t 1T 1 ....i Sear-rcicgr:un/I Ii u i v 1:n Susanne Brett of Gnuhlake holds on to her kite at Bicentennial Park in Southlake. d r A ' BEST PARK: Bicentennial Park,Southlake known parks. area,sand volleyball facilities and a wild- 'p Included in the expansion was Adven- scape area with wildflowers. Bicentennial Park is in the center of ture Alley Playground.a 1-acre,fully "Bicentennial Park has something for Southlake,easily visible from Farm Road handicapped-accessible playground with everyone,"said Kim Lenoir,director of 1 1709 and White Chapel Road.But its repu- areas for toddlers and older children.Four parks and recreation in Southlake."It's I tation has extended beyond city limits, baseball fields were also added,giving well-maintained,too.It's really getting a Expansion completed in March 1996 Bicentennial It)baseball and softball lot of regional attention." and a busy schedule of baseball and soft- fields.A new entrance off Farm Road 1709 hall tournaments have helped make Bicen- adds to the park's beauty. —David Thomas tennial Park one of the region's better- Other park features include a picnic S Reinvestment Zone #1 , Southlake Creation Process / Timeframe Preliminary Schedule of Events Jun-97 Jul-97 A u g-97 Sep-97 SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 ! 2h314I516j7 l 1 ; 2j314 ! 5 1 2 1 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 8 ! 9 10� 11I12!! 13114 61 7 ' 8 9 '110111 ! 12 31 4 , 51 61 7 : 819 7 8 9 10111 12113 15116' 17, 181920',21 1311415161718 19 10, 11112I13!, 14! 15116 14, 15116i17118, 19'120 22i23 24 25,26_27128 20121 22 23 24,25126 17'i18119i20 21122 23 21 22 23�24125 26127 29130 I 1 27!2829'30,31 24' 25126': 27; 28 29 30 28129 30 ! j 311 , 1 Date Day Event 24-Jun-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting Adoption of Resolution setting a Public Hearing on the creation of Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake 25-Jun-97 Wednesday Forward Notice of Public Hearing to Overlapping Taxing Units (Included must be a copy of Public Hearing Resolution, a notice requesting each Taxing Unit to designate within 15 days a representative to meet with City and a copy of the Preliminary Project/Financing Plan) SAug-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting 1st Reading of Ordinance creating Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake 10-Aug-97 Sunday Publish Notice of Public Hearing on the creation of Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake 26-Aug-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting (1) Hold Public Hearing on creation of Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake (Present Preliminary Project/Financing Plan) (2)2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance creating Reinvestment Zone #1, Southlake 2-Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting (I) Approve interlocal agreements with Overlapping Taxing Units (Formalizing Commitment to Participation) (2) Appointment of Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake - Board Members and Board Chairman 1-Sep-97 Monday Reinvestment Zone#1, Southlake Board Meeting Adoption of Final Project/Financing Plan 4110Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting 1st Reading of Ordinance approving Final Project/Financing Plan 16-Sep-97 Tuesday City Council Meeting 2nd Reading of Ordinance approving Final Project/Financing Plan Upcoming Meelidigs and Events 16 . June 16 - 4.6, 1997 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY June 16 June 17 June 18 June 19 June 20 June 21 June 22 9:00am SKY- 11:30am Mayor lunch 7:30am Metroport Possible Packet Day for 3rd Regular CC � Rock Fest @ i Director's Mtg @ w/CM Mtg g Q TBD ,W 1 Texas Motor Admin 5:00pm City Council 9:30am Sexual mtg (6/24) Speedway 9:30am CEH w/ work session; 7:00 Harassment Trng @ attorneys regular session CCRm-spry; non- 2:00pm Westlake 7:00pm SPIN #9,10, - spry. 1:30 Bankruptcy-hearing 14-McMahan @ 6:00pm CEH-NETAC on dismissal Dallas @ WhCh Rm 6:00pm P&Z Mtg work session; 7:00pm regular session Kim Lenoir out of office j June 23 June 24 June 25 June 26 June 27 June 28 June 29 9:00am Director's/ 5:00pm Chamber New 10:00am CMO Staff 7:00pm SPIN PACKET DAY Staff Agenda Mtgs @ Mbr Recpt © Mtg Standing Comm Mtg CCRm D namic Travel 7:00pm ZBA @ CC 11:30am Chamber 7:00pm 3rd Reg CC rrn Luncheon @ Solana Mt. _ (NO BRIEFING) 7:00pm BBA @ CCRm June 30 July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 July 5 July 6 8:30am Director's 11:30am CEH lunch 6:00pm P&Z Mtg; wk Mt_ @ Admin w/Mayor session 6:00; regular ' Cr, 11:30am CC briefing 5:00pm City Council mtg @ 7:00 � from Staff Wk Session begins; 5:30pm News&Times/ , regular mtg @ 7:00 DIs Morning News- July 4th Holiday-CITY Merger Mixer @ HALL CLOSED Delaney Timarron Parade 9am; Timber Lake Parade 10am. 4 Calendar subject to change call for more details 6/13/1997 ...... . . IJJ. IJIO ., . L. rrancis ltl1 I ono-��uo p, 1 • M E M p R AN D 2 wffo To: Mayor Stacy 27 From: Janice L. Francis OFFICE OF CITY 1 SECRETARY Subject Neighborhood poll on the potential for a stadium/sports complex on Timarron tract EEL Date: June 10, 1997 CC: City Council Members Curtis Hawk, City Manager Mr. Mayor, City Council Members, and Curtis Hawk, �mmay, June 7 there was a meeting held at my house for the purpose of discuss ing T��n opment of Tract III with Council member Guy Fawk& At that meeting I polled the 17 neighbors(all residents of ifighland Estates, in attendance and found that no one objected to the possibility of develop t off Highland) built on that property. They all agreed that a butsports otlOx being stadium/sports complex golf course world be most desirable, that a our mP would not be dal to the safety of our children or the valuation of • property. Since only objections were heard at the last council meeting, I felt it was important to let you know not all of us arc against the am a SPIN representative, this meetingI potential for a stadium/sports comply, Although I llce many others that have been held in the last few months, was a neighborhood meeting,not a SPIN meeting. ►�,1 CX',S t � `o cAi- • . �` IP Barry Friedman, CFP 102 Killdeer Court Southlake.rx 76092 - -------------------- — - Telep2hone 817-481-81 18 .. :17-421-0359 re , n 0 reference to a city council meeting on May 21, 1997 1 27 OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY ! TO: Mayor Rick Stacey and the City Council CC: Fort Worth Star Telegram The Grapevine Sun FROM: The concerned residents of Meyers Meadow and Southridge Lakes. Subject: Southlake, Texas - a small town with big city politics....Unfortunately. What ever happened to the rights and interests of the local resident, the taxpayer, the 0 voter? It is easy to see how many of us have been disenfranchised by the size, scope and dynamics of National, State and Big City politics. While it is unfortunate that many of our population have felt that they have no voice and have therefore given up, it is even more distressing to see the blatant disregard of the wishes of the populous by politicians when we do take the time and exert the effort to be heard. Many pundits have said that the American political system will ( or already has ) fallen out of the hands of the electorate because of apathy. The politicians have been listening and have proceeded to believe that the only mandate that they have is to serve themselves or the BIG MONEY interests that help them get elected and re-elected. What in the world am I talking about? Well, I am a resident of the lovely Northeast Tan-ant city of Southlake, home of the Carroll Dragons. This is a wonderful place to live and raise children. The air is still clean, the folks are very friendly, the teachers and school administrators really care, for the most part, about the students and we love living here. Herein, however, lies our gripe. In our lovely little town we are beginning to experience the pangs of rapid growth. As people discover where and what we are, they believe as we do and move into our community. With the increasing number of people obviously comes the need for facilities and services to accommodate the community and its' ink residents. This is understandable, but there is also an obligation to be responsible in how we grow and responsive to the needs and desires of the community. - • w� There is a specific issue at hand, it is the matter of a TETCO (Mobil) gas station and convenience store that is to be constructed right across from Carroll High School and adjacent to two of our prized residential neighborhoods. We are not opposed to growth and do not object to the need to provide services, but with three gas stations within 1/2 mile of this location does this particular facility have to be built across the street from our High School. This project, which was turned down by our planning and zoning commission by a vote of 6 to I, was recently approved by our city council over the vigorous objections of the residents of the community. Not only did the mayor and council approve the project, but they were effusive in their praise for the fine job that the developer had done and what a wonderful asset to the community this gas station and convenience store would be. The justification for this approval by the council was couched in the statement, "The zoning for that property is in place and we do not have the power to do anything about it." What in the world did we elect this people to do, if not to look out for our interests. There is a simple provision in the zoning code that could have easily taken care of this matter, and that is that the zoning applies "unless it conflicts with the health, welfare or • safety" of the residents. This is a problem traffic corner now, and our children are being put at risk every day. With the expanding student population and the increasing traffic, the presence of this facility will do nothing but exacerbate the problem. Where is the council's sense of responsibility to it's electorate and not to the special interests of commercial enterprise. It is sometime hard to forget that our governing body is representative of the commercial sector, when looking for them to represent us. Why the location across from the High School in a community that does not even have a public library, would that not be a significantly better utilization and location? Why another gas station here when so many other parts of the community, with more commercial development, are under served by gas stations? What possible benefit can this possibly serve the community and why has the mayor and council taken such a strong personal interest in this particular project. When questioned at the May 20, 1997 council meeting in which the public was invited to speak on the subject, this question was asked of the mayor, " Is it right for us to assume that the decision has already been made that this project will proceed in spite of our protests?", and the answer, stated with his usual jovial asides, was " Yes, you are right in your assumption". False statements were even made to audience at this meeting in defense of their position. Our erstwhile Mayor claimed that if we were worried about the safety of our children due to the traffic in the area, we should not drive them to ANL school, but let them travel by school bus which is provided for every student. Good try 71.11!)/ Mr. Mayor. but no cigar. First of all, many of our students choose to go to school early to do extra work or to participate in extra activities and we as parents encourage that behavior by driving them. next, our community is not served by a bus to the High School, since we are right across the street. Well, Mr. Mayor Stacey and Honorable City Council, your time will come and the citizens that you ignore today will not ignore you tomorrow. And to our "friends" at TETCO, we would like you to know that you will not be considered a Good Neighbor in our community and you will not receive the support and respect that we provide to our Good Neighbors in the business community. Last but not least, we would like to go on record as stating that since you all have ignored the advice of the planning and zoning commission and public safety and have gone ahead with this project in spite of the consideration of the health, welfare or safety of the residents, we are going to hold each and every one of you, Mr. Mayor, Council persons and TETCO, personally liable should any harm come to even one of our children, or indeed to any of our citizens as a result of this irresponsible action on your part. We will also "SEE YOU AT THE POLLS". City of Southlake,Texas 110 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 17, 1997 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall I WORK SESSION: 5:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. 1 REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive session will be held from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. • 3. Approval ppro al of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on June 3, 1997. 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report. C. SPIN Report. D. Park and Recreation Board Report. E. Southlake Youth Action Commission Report. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and I considered in its normal sequence. 110 5. Consent: I . City of Southlake,Texas S Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 2 A. Request to advertise for bids for the five million gallon ground storage tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Boulevard on the east side of T.W. King Road. B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. One with Wright Construction Company for the installation of the 20-inch water main along East Southlake Boulevard, from South White Chapel Boulevard east to Miron Drive. C. Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with Mesa Group for professional services for Bicentennial Park expansion, Phase II. D. Addendum to Cheatham and Associates' contract for professional services to include Phase II design of Bob Jones Park, to include parking lots, drives, irrigation, landscaping, and other park improvements. 4 E. Request to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park, Phase I. F. Excuse the absences of Councilmember Pamela Muller from two consecutive Council meetings. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearing, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-245, 2nd reading (ZA 97-035), Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Miron Addition, according to the plat records in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 0.346 acres. Location: West side of Miron Drive being approximately 680' south of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and Miron Drive. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park District. Requested zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Owner/Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8. PUBLIC HEARING. B. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 2nd reading, Establishing regulations for personal care facilities. S PUBLIC HEARING. C. Ordinance No. 483-G, 2nd reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items). City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 3 PUBLIC HEARING. D. Ordinance No. 483-F, 2nd reading, Amending Ordinance No. 483, The Subdivision Ordinance, revising the entirety of Article VII, Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Ordinance No. 480-222, 2nd reading, (ZA 96-132), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Timarron Commercial, Tract III, being approximately 200.82 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D. Location: North of State Highway 114, east of North Carroll Avenue, south of East Highland Street, and west of North Kimball Avenue. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested zoning is "NR-P-U-D" Non- Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0- 2" Office District, `C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #4 and #6. PUBLIC HEARING. F. ZA 97-056, Development Plan of Timarron Addition, Village J, being legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. Location: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron L:P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. PUBLIC HEARING. G. ZA 97-057, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition, Village J, being legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, 411 Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. Location: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 4 of East Continental Boulevard. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development District. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron L.P. SPIN Neighborhood #9. H. ZA 97-063, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22 (Common Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One, being a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 2.880 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. Location: South side of Saxon Trail at the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon Trail. Current zoning is "R-P-U-D" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: Westerra-Timarron L.P. SPIN Neighborhood #13. ZA 97-053, Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network, being legally described as Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of • Southlake, Texas, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2120, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.97 acres situated in the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. Location: South side of Ravenaux Drive approximately 500' west of the intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. Owner/Applicant: Christian Men's Network. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING. J. ZA 97-054, Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II, being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.058 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. Location: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 700' east of the intersection of South Kimball Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. Applicant: Realty Capital Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #7. PUBLIC HEARING. K. ZA 97-058, Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II, being legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.8685 acres City of Southlake,Texas • Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 5 situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410' east of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: 1709 Southlake Oaks, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #13. PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first reading, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 678, 1st reading, An ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, annexing the hereinafter more particularly described territory generally described as an area comprising approximately 480 acres abutting State Highway 114, known as "Solana", and an area comprising approximately 27 acres abutting that property to the City of Southlake, Texas, and extending the boundary limits of said City so as to include said territory within said City limits and granting to all owners of property all of the rights and privileges of other citizens and binding said owners and other persons within the annexed area by all the Acts, Ordinances, and S regulations of said City; approving a service plan for such territory; providing a severability clause; and providing for an effective date. B. Ordinance No. 679, 1st reading, Street name change from South Kimball Avenue to Crooked Lane Boulevard, for the portion of South Kimball Avenue from the intersection of South Kimball Avenue and Crooked Lane Boulevard to East Continental Boulevard and a street name change for East Continental Boulevard to South Kimball Avenue in Heritage Industrial Park. 9. Resolutions (no items this agenda) 10. Other item for consideration: A. Selection of site for new joint City of Southlake/C.I.S.D. Administration Building. 11. Other item for discussion: A. A Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent School District Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness. 0 12. Adjournment. City of Southlake,Texas S Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 6 CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, June 13, 1997, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. ` oJ`/vALAK4� Xiiiiiviit,v =0 %" andra L. LeGrand A,.' City Secretary ,r� g itigjit If you plan to attend this public meeting and ave a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. EXECUTIVE SESSION IIIPENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Vicci Winchester vs. Dan McKee Water Service Company, and the City of Southlake 1995. 2. D/FW-White Chapel Ltd. vs. State of Texas and the City of Southlake. 1996. 3. Town of Westlake, Texas et al vs. City of Southlake, Texas 1997. 4. City of Southlake vs. Kathy A. Brown, William J. Justus, trustee, William James Elder and James M. Elder, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Trust. 1997. 5. Town of Westlake, Texas vs. City of Southlake, Carroll Huntress, et al. 1997. 6. Legal action against Scott Bradley, Charla Bradshaw, Abe Bush, and Fred Held. LAND ACQUISITION-SECTION 551.072 • The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisition in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session. PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074 7 The City Council may consider the appointment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 17, 1997 page 7 Attorney, and City Boards and Commission members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's office. DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation arise or a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. 6/17/97 d:\wp-files\cc-6-17-97\wpd\s1 • t City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING NNE 19. 1997 • LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 P.M. TO 6:30 P.M. 1. Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to seek the advice of the City Attorney. 2. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of June 5, 1997. 3. Administrative Comments.410 CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 4. Consent: ZA 97-072, FINAL PLAT FOR KIRKWOOD HOLLOW, PHASE I, being approximately 54.894 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A 1, 3A4A, and 3A4B and in the James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. This plat proposes 70 residential lots, 2 common areas, and 1 city park: Location: West side of North White Chapel Boulevard at the intersection of Sweet Street and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. SPIN Neighborhood#2. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 13, 1997. 5. Consent: ZA 97-073, FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH HOLLOW, PHASE II, being S approximately 10.821 acres situated in the J.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and being Tracts 6B2 and 6B3. This plat proposes 17 residential lots and 1 common area. Location: North side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 1,100' east of the intersection of Carlisle Lane and East r ` City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 19, 1997 PAGE 2 Continental Boulevard. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owner: Vista Oaks Development, Ltd. Applicant: Carter & Burgess, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 13, 1997. REGULAR AGENDA: 6. Consider: ZA 97-055, REZONING of approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. Location: Approximately 200' east of the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Owner/Applicant: Ken Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA 97-067, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONECREST BUSINESS PARK, being legally described as approximately 43.69 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No.474,and being Tracts 5, 5A, 11 A, and 11B. This plat proposes twenty-four (24) lots. Location: East side of Crooked Lane and approximately 560' south of the intersection East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. IIIOwners/Applicants: Ken and Darla Smith. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA 97-074, REZONING on property described as approximately 485 acres, known as Solana and situated in the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107; the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas; William Pea Survey, Abstract No. 2025,Tarrant County,Texas,the same being Abstract No. 1045, Denton County, Texas; and the J. Henry Survey, Abstract No. 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract No. 528, Denton County,Texas. Location: South and West of State Highway No. 114, East of Precinct Line Road , and North of the Town of Westlake. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex,known as Solana,to include the following uses: "0-2"Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-I" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Owners: International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership, Maguire Partners-Westlake Partnership, and MTP-IBM Phases II & III Joint Venture. Public Hearing. • • City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 19, 1997 • PAGE 3 9. Consider: ZA 97-075, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT SOLANA MARRIOTT HOTEL, on the property described as Lot 2R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records, being approximately 6.286 acres. Location: 5 Village Circle. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-residential Planned Unit Development with "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Hospitality International, Inc. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA 97-076, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT CHILI'S RESTAURANT AT SOLANA, on the property described as Lot 1R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2,Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. Location: 3 Village Circle, Suite 108. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2" Office District,"C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and "HC" Hotel District. Applicant: Chili's Beverage Company. Owner: Maguire/Thomas Partners-Westlake/Southlake Partnership. Public Hearing. 11. Consider: ZA 97-077, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AT RAKIP (JIM) LUSHA D/B/A LA SCALA RESTAURANT, on the property described as Lot 1R, Block 2, of a final plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2, Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1, filed in Cabinet A, Slide 283, dated November 16, 1989, in the Tarrant County Map and Plat Records. Location: 3 Village Circle, Suite 115. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development with the following uses: "0-2" Office District,"C-3"General Commercial District,"B-1"Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and"HC" Hotel District. Applicant: La Scala Ristorante Italiano, Inc. Owner: Maguire / Thomas Partners- Westlake/Southlake Partnership. Public Hearing. 111 t City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 19, 1997 • PAGE 4 12. Consider: ZA 97-021, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN OF TIMBER LAKE ESTATES, being approximately 18.173 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 and being Tract 4F, Tract 4F1, and a portion of Tract 5A1. Location: South side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) at the intersection of West Jellico Circle and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District (Tract 4F and Tract 4F1) and "CS" Community Service District (Tract 5A1). Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Ernest Owen. SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA 97-061, SITE PLAN OF SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST EDUCATION BUILDING, being the proposed Lot 3R-1, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition on property legally described as Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to the State of Texas by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153-127796-90, a certified copy of which is recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District. Applicant: Larry D. Stone. Owner: Southlake Church of Christ. SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: ZA 97-062,PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 3R-1, J. G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADDITION, being a revision of Lot 3R, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2174, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Brock Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-44, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, save and except the portion awarded to the State of Texas by Agreed Judgement entered in Cause No. 153-127796-90, a certified copy of which is recorded in Volume 11284, Page 1121, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection of Brock Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District. Owner and Applicant: Southlake Church of Christ. SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. • City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA il JUNE 19, 1997 PAGE 5 15. Consider: DUE TO CASE RESOLUTION NO. 97-22, THE FOLLOWING CASES WILL NOT BE HEARD ON THIS AGENDA AND WILL BE CONTINUED TO JULY 3, 1997: Case #ZA 97-064, Site Plan of Southridge Center, Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1. (Public Hearing) Case #ZA 97-065, Development Plan of Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek, Phase II. (Public Hearing) Case #ZA 97-066, Preliminary Plat of Timarron Addition - Wyndsor Creek, Phase II. (Public Hearing) 16. Consider: MEETING ADJOURNMENT. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, June 13, 1997 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551��, ov�StHCq��i��i,� I/440, I �j O R` } j Sandra L. LeGrand co se. City Secretary r. **it of If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs,please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581,extension 704,and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. EXECUTIVE SESSION If a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. • L:\WP-FILES\MTG\AGMI997\06-I9-97.WPD 0 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 3, 1997 COUNCILMIEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy, Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans (arrived at 9:40 p.m.); Deputy Mayor Pro Tem David Harris. Members: Scott Martin, Gary Fawks, Wayne Moffat. COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Pamela Muller. STAFF PRESENT: Curtis Hawk, City Manager, Shaba Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Darcey Imm, Assistant to the City Manager; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager; Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Ron Harper, City Engineer; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Shawn Poe, Engineer; Kim Lenior, Director of Parks and Recreation; Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety; E. Allen Taylor Jr., City Attorney; and Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. • WORK SESSION: The work session was held to discuss agenda items by Council and staff. INVOCATION: Deputy Mayor Pro Tem David Harris. Mayor Rick Stacy called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and to consider the appointment and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devises. Council adjourned into executive session at 6:18 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:20 p.m. No action was taken as the result of the executive session. 0 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #3, Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes Approval was given to the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on May 20, 1997; the Special City Council meetings held on May 26, and May 27, 1997 and the Regular City Council meeting on May 27, 1997. Motion: Harris Second: Fawks Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #4-A, Mayor's Report Mayor Rick Stacy informed the audience that Councilmember Pamela Muller would not be present at the meeting tonight as her father, Walter Muller, passed away on June 2, 1997. The Mayor asked that we keep Pamela and her family in our prayers. Mayor Stacy also referenced the following items during the Mayor's Report: • ■ Announcement of the June Retreat to be held on June 10 and 11, 1997. On June 10, the Carroll School Board will be meeting with Council at 6:15 p.m. The June 11 session will begin at 8:30 a.m. ending at 8:00 p.m. • The Northeast Leadership Forum will hold a meeting on June 13, 1997 at 11:30 a.m. to be held in the Library Conference Room at the City of Euless. The Mayor stated he will be attending and invited other Councilmembers to also attend. • The final celebration of the 40th birthday of the City of Southlake will be held on September 17, 1997. More information to come. • The Mayor stated he signed contracts today for improvements to Love Henry Court, Dov e Road from SH 114 to White Chapel Boulevard, and Continental Boulevard. He also noted he and the City Manager met with Wes Held with TxDot this week, and he was assured that Southlake roadway improvements on SH 114 cannot be far off schedule. • The start date is 1998 with completion by 2000. • Mayor Stacy stated the First Annual Carroll Education Foundation will be held on June 6 with a roast of Dale Hansen. The Mayor noted he will be attending and will serve as the auctioneer. • • A reception was held for Congressman Dick Armey last week, and was attended by Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 2 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Councilmembers Fawks and Evans. The City Manager, Curtis Hawk, also attended. Fawks noted this is the third event for Armey in our area in less than one year. • Other items mentioned are the Carroll Bank Booster Golf Tournament; ground breaking for Ebby Holiday at the corner of F.M. 1709 and Carroll Avenue; Summer Santa program; and the MetroPort Meals on Wheels Golf Tournament. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report Curtis Hawk, City Manger, informed the public that Tarrant County will participate with Southlake on two roadway reconstruction projects this year, including: North White Chapel Boulevard from Dove Road to the Tarrant County line; and, Brumlow, from Continental Boulevard to SH 26. The City will furnish the material and the County will furnish the labor as outlined in the interlocal agreement. Agenda Item #11, SPIN Report Roger Hutton, SPIN #11 Representative, 1900 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake. Mr. Hutton stated he plans to participate in the SPIN annual review of boundaries for SPIN groups. He worked wit h S SPIN #11 neighborhoods in the solicitation of projects for public works for the upcoming year. He expressed appreciation to Mayor Stacy and Councilmembers and staff for the time and commitment they have with SPIN. He stated the City Manager's office is committed to SPIN and it is greatly appreciated by all residents of Southlake. He noted he appreciates Karen Gandy, which was his first encounter with city personnel. Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda Mayor Stacy stated agenda items #5-A, and #5-B, have been deleted from the Council agenda as Council no longer plans to have an August Special Election, but rather will try to have the election in November. The consent agenda consists of the following: 5-C. Park Project and Community Matching Fund Request Policy. 5-D. Award of bid for copiers for City offices. 5-E. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Trammel Crow Companies for paving repairs to Commerce Street. 5-F. Home Depot request for variance to the bufferyard requirements along SH 114 due to the right-of-way acquisition by the Texas Department of Transportation. S Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 3 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 5-G. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract for waterline improvements and the construction of a six-inch sanitary sewer line from 200 North Kimball Avenue to approximately 600 ft. west of Westwood Drive. 5-H. ZA 97-059, Plat Revision for Rucker's Hacienda De Gusto, for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Rucker's Hacienda De Gusto, being approximately 0.773 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey. Owners: William and Zena Rucker. Applicants: Mike and Carol Rucker. 5-I. Resolution No. 97-41, Second extension to the moratorium on personal care facilities. 8-D. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 1st reading, Establishing regulations for personal care facilities. 8-E. Ordinance No. 483-G, 1st reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items). 10-A. Developer Agreement for Foxborough Addition, located on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard, approximately 1,140' west of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and North Carroll Avenue. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda including: item #5-C, #5-E, #5-F, #5-G, #5-H, S #5-I (with the modification to show the moratorium extended for 45 days), #8-D, #8-E, #10-A, (with the addition of the requirement that construction traffic not be allowed through the residential area and also, further providing that the credit for the easement sought in the Developer Agreement be reduced from $18,000 to $14,000). Motion: Harris Second: Martin Mayor Rick Stacy read the captions of Ordinance No. 480-Y (#8-D) and Ordinance No. 483-G (#8-E). Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Mayor Stacy abstained from item #5-E. Councilmember Scott Martin thanked Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission for all the hours spend on Ordinances No. 480-Y and 483-G. Agenda Item #5-D, Award of Bid for Copiers for City Offices Sam Yaple, President and Gary Stallings, District Manager, Keystone Information Management Services, 8500 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 6077 Dallas, Texas. Both gentlemen were present from • Keystone Information Management Services, stating the bid for copiers for City offices was not Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 4 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL to form. They alledged they met the requirements of the bid for far less money. It was determined that Keystone does not service their accounts. Mr. Yaple stated they work in a mixed service environment and that Emory-Buddy is the company who services the copiers for them. They noted Emory-Buddy has been in business since 1942 and are well known in Tarrant and Dallas counties. Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, explained the reasons staff chose to go with Lanier, adding, there were twelve bids with seven different vendors. She noted we currently make 155,000 copies per month in the City of Southlake. Motion was made to approve the bid for copiers as recommended by Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance. Motion: Harris Second: Martin Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CONSENT ITEMS S5-C. Project and Community Matching Fund Request Policy. The Park Board discussed a need to develop a project policy to guide the Board and community groups in a standard process for proposing and considering community projects in the parks. In March, SPDC set aside $100,000 for matching funds for community-based projects in the parks. This combined policy defines the matching funds as a dollar for dollar match. 5-D. There is an urgent need for additional copiers within the City. On May 13, 1997, bids were received from seven vendors for copiers. The specifications requested three new copiers, one for the Administration Building, an two for City Hall. The two existing copiers at City Hall would be transferred to the Parks and Public Works buildings. The specifications also called for the contracts on the existing copiers to be consolidated into the pricing for the new units. The two lowest qualifying bids were submitted by Lanier Worldwide, Inc. and Keystone Information Management Systems, Inc. The 1996-97 amount budgeted for copiers this year is $38,000. Two new copiers had been included in the $38,000 budgeted amount because of the new Public Works building and the necessity for an additional unit at the Administration building. An additional copier was added to the bid so that an existing copyier could be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Department. This would exceed the budgeted amount of$38,000 by approximately $950. 5-E. Contract with Trammel Crow Company for paving repairs to Commerce Street. SCommerce Street located in Commerce Business Park was built in 1986. A section of the Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 5 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL street has "failed" as it has been raised by an apparent defect in the base or sub-base material. Commerce Street with the current increased development in the Business Park is carrying a significant increase in traffic. The contract with Trammel Crow Company to have their contractor L.H. Lacey reconstruct approximately 444 square yards of Commerce Street is for a total estimated cost of $21,312. The funds are budgeted in Streets and Drainage Division (144), Object Code 781.00 which has been designated for maintenance. 5-F. Home Depot request for variance to the bufferyard requirement along S.H. 114 due to the right-of-way acquisition by the Texas Department of Transportation. Staff recommended, that the variance be requested, due to the taking of the additional right-of-way for the improvements to S.H. 114 and based upon TxDot allowing the required landscaping to be placed in the S.H. 114 ROW, to reestablish a 25-foot landscape buffer along S.H.114, that the variance be requested. 5-G. Contract for sanitary sewer improvements to construct a six-inch sanitary sewer line from 2171 East Southlake Boulevard to approximately 600 feet west of Westwood Drive. The low bidder for this project is J.S. Constructors of Keller for $155,937. The bid consisted of two units. Unit I is to establish a 6-inch sanitary sewer line. Unit II is to remove and S replace a section of the existing 12-inch water line to remove four 90 degree bends in the water main. The 1997 Bonds included $160,000 for the sanitary sewer line. 5-H. Plat Revision for Lot 1, Block 1, Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto, 0.773 acres being a portion of Tract 3 in Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 and a revision of Common Green No. 36, Block 12, Timarron Addition-Brenwyck, Phase 2. Owners: William and Zena Rucker. Applicants: Mike and Carol Rucker. 5-I. Resolution No. 97-41, Second extension to the moratorium on personal care facilities (assisted living facilities). For a period of forty-five (45) days, effective upon expiration of the original one hundred and twenty (120) day moratorium and the sixty (60) day extension thereof, no application for a permit shall be accepted and no permit shall be issued for any assisted care living center in the City of Southlake unless an applicati on for the permit was received by the City prior to the passage of the original moratorium or unless the assisted care living center received planned unit development zoning approval from the City Council. The purpose of this moratorium is to maintain the status quo within the City until such time as proper regulations have been adopted with regard to assisted care living centers. 8-D. Ordinance No. 480-Y, 1st reading, Establishing regulations for personal care facilities. S8-E. Ordinance No. 483-G, 1st reading, Subdivision Ordinance (miscellaneous items). Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 6 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 10-A. Developer Agreement for Foxborough, located on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard, approximately 1,140" west of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and North Carroll Avenue. Highlights of the agreement include: • Off-Site and/or Sewer Pro-Rata: The proposed Developer Agreement pertains to the easements on three lots in the addition. In exchange for the easement, the Developer is requesting the following items: 1) the sanitary sewer installed in these easements benefits the neighborhoods and therefore, the cost will be the City's responsibility; and, 2) the City not construct any manholes on any residential lot in the addition; and, 3) the City reduce the inspection fees as called for in paragraph I.G.I. a. by an amount of $15,000 which equals the lost value of$5,000 per lot for "incumbering the affected lots with said utility easements" his request has been added to Section 1.G.1.a. for better clarifications and, 4) the City will waive the Sewer Impact Fee of$1,000 per lot for the three lots impacted by the easements. • Off-Site Drainage: The Developer will intercept and put in a drainage pipe for approximately two lots north of Ownby Lane to manage the drainage from the west lots of Southview Addition. The construction will be placed in an existing drainage easement along the Southview lots. III ♦ Off-Site Water: Developer will install the required 12-inch water main along the addition frontage on Southlake Boulevard. However, the commercial lot in the addition is apparently owned by a third party, and the water main will not be extended across that property unless the City request that it is to be completed and impose some type of pro- rata on the commercial lot Developer to pay the cost upon commencing to build. • Park Fee: The 46.77 acre addition has 63 residential lots. Per Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Article VII (Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements), the Developer will be required to pay $31,500 ($500/per lot). "In recognition of Developer setting aside approximately 215,000 sq.ft. of the Foxborough Addition as public open space for landscaping and recreation, the Developer agrees to pay fifty percent (50%) of the normal Park Fee of$500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 7.0". There are approximately 46.77 acres in Foxborough Addition which would bring the net cost of Park Fee to $11,692.50. If the Park Board grants any credit then the Developer will need to come back to the Council and amend this Developer Agreement. Agenda Item #6, Public Forum Kenneth Home, 1215 Ashmore Court, Southlake. Mr. Horne asked that the developers of Timarron on Tract II have minimum house size on the tracts. The residents in the area do not • want to see smaller houses. He asked Council to please keep that in mind. Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 7 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #7-A, Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading, Granting a Cable Television Franchise owned by Marcus Cable Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 583 which grants a cable television franchise currently owned by Marcus Cable Associates, L. P.; granting consent to the assignment and transfer of a cable television system and franchise from Harron Cablevision of Texas, Inc., to Marcus Cable Associates, L.P.; repealing Ordinance No. 321 which granted a cable television franchise currently owned by Harron Cablevision of Texas, Inc. Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager, made a presentation to Council with regard to this transfer stating, the City is not renegotiating the existing franchise agreement with Marcus, but simply seeking to amend the existing agreement. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were received during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve the revised Ordinance No. 675, 2nd reading as presented tonight. Motion: Harris Second: Fawks Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. S Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #7-B, Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading (ZA 97-047), Commerce Square Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading (ZA 97-047), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square, on property legally described as 7.22 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A. Current zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and limited "I-1" Light Industrial uses. Requested zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and limited "I-1" Light Industrial District uses. Applicant: Terry Wilkinson. Owner: Southlake Properties, Inc. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that no further presentation will be made as there have been no changes from the first reading. Terry Wilkinson, 930 Normandy, Southlake, was present asking Council to approve as they did on first reading. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. S Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 8 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-244, 2nd reading, as per the motion made during the first reading on May 20, 1997 (see meeting minutes). Motion: Martin Second: Harris Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat Nays: None Abstention: Stacy Approved: 4-0 vote Agenda Item #7-C, Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading (ZA 97-044) Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading (ZA 97-044), Rezoning of approximately 4.00 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, being Tract 2C. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Jack and Barbara Rudduck. SPIN Neighborhood #10. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that there have been no changes since the first reading. S Jack Rudduck, 217 Lilac Lane, Southlake. Mr. Rudduck stated he wants to rezone the property to have his son build his own home on the property. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-242, 2nd reading. Motion: Fawks Second: Martin Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Fawks, Martin, Moffat, Harris, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #7-D, ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's • ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's being legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Village Center, Phase I, and being approximately 0.816 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Owner: T & M Southlake Development Company. Applicant: Wendy's International, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #4. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, commented that five (5) notices were sent to property • owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) written response has been received from Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 9 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Southlake Land Ltd., Dennis Scifres, G.P., 301 Commerce #1205, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor. Barry Hudson, 500 West 7th Street, Suite 600, Fort Worth. Mr. Hudson stated they have complied with the Planning and Zoning Commission comments, noting, Greg Last, informed them of the requirement for articulation, and it is their intention to meet that articulation. Mr. Hudson noted this store differed from the Davis Boulevard location because they plan to use purified walls. The store will seat eighty-eight (88), with thirty-seven (37) parking spaces planned. He added, the ordinance calls for thirty-one (31) spaces. Councilmember Martin questioned the two flood lights on the north side of the building. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 97-052, Site Plan for Wendy's, pursuant to the Review Summary Letter No. 2, dated May 30, 1997; deleting #3-B (south curb); stipulating that the applicant has agreed to meet the articulation requirement; and that the applicant has agreed to do a light study, and consider the existing light in the Village Center in order to meet the minimum corporate standards. SMotion: Martin Second: Fawks Ayes: Martin, Fawks, Harris, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #7-E, ZA 96-162, Concept Plan for Telesupport East Campus ZA 96-162 Concept Plan for Telesupport East Campus, being legally described as Lot 25R1, Block 1, Woodland Heights Addition, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1681, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 2.070 acres. Current zoning is `C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District. Owner: Roy C. Lee. Applicant: G. Phillip Morley. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, made a presentation stating seven (7) notices were sent to property owners within the 200 foot notification area and one (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area from Frank Ritz, 2101 East Southlake Boulevard, in favor. Two (2) responses have been received from outside the notification area, from: Larry Marshall, 905 Parkview Lane, Southlake, in favor "as long as the elevation is complimentary to the buildings adjoining to the east and west." Diane and Larry Faughn, 215 Eastwood, Southlake, opposed. The applicant has met all the requirements in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated Januar y S 3, 1997 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 16, 1997, with the exception of Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 10 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL those requirements in the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 30 1997. Jim Monday, Chief Financial Officer for Telesupport. Mr. Monday stated they are waiting for their engineering report for the third lane on Westwood (right turn off Westwood). Mr. Monday stated the Planning and Zoning Commission asked for a driveway onto F.M. 1709. He is concerned about delaying action as it has been nine (9) months so far that he has tried to complete the requirements of the concept plan. Mr. Monday asked to have this item tabled time certain the 3rd City Council meeting in June. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to table ZA 96-162, time certain June 24, 1997, at the request of the applic ant, continuing the public hearing. Motion: Harris Second: Fawks Ayes: Harris, Fawks, Martin, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None 0 Approved: 5-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #8-A, Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading ZA 97-035, Miron Addition Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading (ZA 97-035), Rezoning of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Miro n Addition, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. And being approximately 0.346 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park District, with a requested zoning of "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Owner/Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated five (5) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) written response has been received from Smock & Huss eini JV, M.M. Smock, 1529 Lambert Blvd., Oakland, California, undecided. Smock stated, "We do not know what the ramifications would be to our adjacent property with this zoning." Staff commented that the purpose for the rezoning of this strip of land is to avoid a split lot zoning classification within the proposed Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition. This strip of land is the remainder of Lot 3 located between the land purchased by the City and the R.O.W. quit claimed to the owner of Lot 4. The City Zoning Administrator has waived the Concept Plan requirement for this strip and has informed the owner that a revised Concept Plan for the entirety of Lot 4R will be required prior to issuance of any building permit. SMartin Schelling, 2665, North White Chapel Boulevard, Southlake. Mr. Schelling stated this Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 11 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL action is a "house keeping issue" to make the lot have the same zoning. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-245, 1st reading (ZA 97-035). Motion: Fawks Second: Moffat Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Fawks, Moffat, Harris, Martin, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #8-B, ZA 97-036, Concept Plan for Lots 3R1-3R6, Block 1, Miron Addition ZA 97-036, Concept Plan for Lots 3R1-3R6, Block 1, Miron Addition being legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 4.758 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park District. Owner/Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Martin Schelling, applicant, stated he has committed to the neighborhood behind his property that he will put up an eight foot fence (eastern and southern). He stated he does not plan on a two • story structure and that he will save all the trees that he can and still use his property. Councilmember Martin asked if because he brought forward the concept plan at this time, does he only have to comply with he current ordinances. Allen Taylor, City Attorney, responded to Mr. Martin by stating, "Once they made application they must comply with those in place at the time only." Motion was made to approve ZA 97-036, pursuant to the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 30, 1997; following the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations. Motion: Martin Second: Harris Ayes: Martin, Harris Fawks, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #8-C, ZA 97-037, Plat Revision Lots 3R1-3R7, and Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition • ZA 97-037, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 3R1-3R7 and Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 12 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL being a revision to Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, Miron Addition, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 11.081 acres. Current zoning is "B-1" Business Service Park District and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Owners: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee (Lots 3R1-3R6 and Lot 4R, Block 1) and the City of Southlake (Lot 3R7, Block 1). Applicant: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Greg Last, Director of Community Development, commented in item #2 in the review summary, there is a 15' utility easement that the Director of Public Works, Bob Whitehead, wants the City to retain, to run the water transmission line to the City lot. Mr. Whitehead stated we need a 30' easement (15' on the Gorbett property and 15' on the Schelling property). Motion was made to approve ZA 97-0Z7, Plat Revision, subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated May 30, 1997, accepting the recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Commission on item#1; modifying the Planning and Zoning recommendation on item#2, to allow the vacation of a 5' utility easement on the south side, but retaining the full 15' utility easement on the west side. Motion: Harris Second: Martin S Ayes: Harris, Martin, Fawks, Moffat, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #8-E, Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132) Timarron Commercial Tract III. Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Timarron Commercial, Tract III, being approximately 200.82 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 1,1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested zoning is "NR-P-U-D" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0- 2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres), from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family District, "SF-30" Single Family District, and "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: Timarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood #4 and #6. SKaren Gandy, Zoning Administrator, made a presentation explaining the original request and the Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 13 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL amended request. A copy of the memorandum from Ms. Gandy, dated May 30, 1997 is hereby attached to the minutes of the meeting, as well as the Timarron Commercial Tract III Development Regulations. Dennis Jerkey, Carter & Burgess. Mr. Jerkey explained the changes in the Development Regulations for Tract II. Mayor Pro Tem W. Ralph Evans arrived at 9:40 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Harold Knight, 1749 East Highland, Southlake. Mr. Knight stated he has twenty-five acres under contract with the CISD and they have an option on the remainder of his property. Jerry Lawrence, 1901 East Highland, Southlake. Mr. Lawrence stated he thinks the Planning and Zoning Commission did a good job. He asked if the TIF does encompass all the property, how will he, as an adjoining property owner with mixed use, relate with the TIF? He asked if what will be approved tonight will also approve the TIF? He stated he wants to get all the cards on the table. • Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated there is no relationship between the TIF and this property. The reason the City is looking at the whole area when putting things together, is so the City will be able to buffer, and so that the revenues from the TIF can be spent to do things along the roadway and can be spent within the district. If that area were not included, the money could not be spent in that area. The larger area is drawn for no more reason than that. Mr. Lawrence asked if this needs to be talked about now. Mr. Hawk stated we don't know what properties will be included at this time or the uses. We are taking the larger area so that the City can use revenues that are derived from the commercial development in the district to do all the things that need to be done and to protect the property owners along Kimball, Highland and Carroll. • Dr. Charles Kennard, 1235 Stanhope Court, Southlake. Dr. Kennard referenced the citizen survey. He stated he wants the preservation of a rural atmosphere and preservation of our schoo 1 system. He stated Southlake has achieved a reputation that we fight progress. He stated he would like to see no commercial development on Highland. He does not feel we should allow hotels or any commercial that would bring traffic near our schools. S Dale Crane, 1469 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Crane referenced his memorandum to the Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 14 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Council and delivered this afternoon. He referenced six other neighbors he is speaking for. Debbie Guthrie, 1230 Stanhope Court, Southlake. Mr. Guthrie referenced the "Bubble A" and moving the line back. It is the same hill Dr. Kennard is talking about. Ms. Guthrie stated the residents want to be sure no "pad sites" are along S.H. 114. • Jeanne Cook, 1981 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Cook stated she has been to all the meetings and is very interested. She referenced discussions held at Planning and Zoning meetings with regard to property behind them. Ms. Hardin, 1991 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Hardin stated they rezoned there property five years ago as residential. She expressed concerns about what is going to happen next to her property. Dona Schroetke, 211 Eastwood Drive, Southlake. Ms. Schroetke referenced uses that were not to be included on the 2,000 foot frontage along S.H. 114. She stated she feels the City Council should revisit the areas shown as Special Use Permits, especially manufacturing. Dr. Robert Bledsoe, 1600 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Bledsoe asked if the City is going to • put a sports stadium on this property. Mayor Stacy stated the City looked at "Tract C" for a bowl type stadium some time ago. The City has to build a facility that will keep up with our growth. The need exists, but we don't know where it will go. Cindy Richardson, 1200 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Ms. Richardson stated she is concerned with traffic on Highland. She fears when commercial comes in, it will make the traffic worse. Mayor Stacy stated there will be no access off Highland. All traffic from the commercial property will be from S.H. 114. Maria Cameron, 1776 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Cameron expressed concern with parcel A and the highest hill on Highland. She asked for a 500' setback. She stated she wants to see natural plantings, using natural instead of new plantings. Butch Dosburg, 1204 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Mr. Dosberg expressed concern with the water run-off from the development. He commented on the tank on Highland in parcel A. Laura Bellamy, 1202 Blythe Lane, Southlake. Ms. Bellamy had questions with regard to the 100' set-back from residential to commercial. S Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 15 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Jackie Lawrence, 1901 East Highland, Southlake. Ms. Lawrence stated she is frustrated, she thought we were talking about a hotel and now we are talking about a stadium. Jim Haltom, 1700 Sunshine Lane, Southlake. Mr. Haltom stated he likes Los Colinas and he likes Solana and he wants to see this property develop just like them. Public comments closed. Dennis Jerkey, Carter & Burgess, stated he understands the concerns with the 300' set-back on Highland. Jerkey stated they can live with the same wording as on Tract II. He understands concerns with the hill on Highland. They would be willing to take the cross/hatched up at Parcel A. They will go along with a 300' set back for Parcel C next to Parcel A for heavy commercial uses and subject to the City Council review. He also agreed to 300' set-back on Parcel D north end. Councilmember Fawks stated he is concerned about the pad site on S.H. 114 and is concerned with lining S.H. 114 with fast food restaurants. S Steve Yetts, Timarron Land Development. Mr. Yetts stated he will take the comments concerning pad sites and the lake under consideration and bring back to Council in two weeks. He noted they are losing roughly twenty acres to right-of-way on the property. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-222, 1st reading (ZA 96-132), subject to the June 3, 1997 submittal by the applicant; further incorporating the requirement that the northern most portion of Tract A and D be modified to reflect a 300' no-build zone for any use other than residential; the set-back can be modified by Council with special site plan approval; also, to amend the ordinance to include the offer by the applicant to extend the red cross-hatched area also known as the 300' set-back found on the requested concept plan to include the remaining part of Tract C which is bounded by Parcel A's line and Parcel D's line on the north and west of the cross-hatched area as shown on the concept plan. Motion: Harris Second: Evans Mayor Rick Stacy read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Harris, Evans, Fawks, Moffat, Martin, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #9-A, Resolution No. 97-42, Establishing an Economic Development Program with Solana. S Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 16 of 17 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES---NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated this item will not be discussed tonight, but will be brought back at the next City Council meeting. Agenda Item #11-A, Discussion: Schedule for June Retreat Curtis Hawk presented the schedule for the June Retreat to be held on June 10 and 11, noting if Council has an item to add, let him or the City Secretary know as soon as possible. He added the packets for the retreat will be delivered to Council on Friday. Councilmember Scott Martin suggested a discussion on Council's goal status report would be helpful. Agenda Item#11-B, Discussion: Calendar for Creation of a Tax Increment Financing District The City Manager informed Council that a resolution will be placed on the June 24 Regular City Council meeting which will set the process in motion. The preliminary plan will be complete by June 27 with a final reading of the ordinance by August 26, 1997. Agenda Item #12, Adjournment SThe meeting was adjourned by Mayor Rick Stacy at 11:15 p.m. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary d:\wp-files\cc\6\3\97\min\s1 0 Regular City Council Minutes of the June 3, 1997 Meeting Page 17 of 17 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING June 9, 1997 MINUTES Board Members Present: Larry Goldstein, Sherry Berman, Doug Fierce, Gary Beyer, Vicki Johnson, Ronnie Kendall, Carol Lee Hamilton and Richard Anderson Members Absent: Robin Jones City Staff-Present: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation; Teddi R. Zonker, Administrative Secretary; Kathy Schaeffer, Recreation Supervisor; Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager; Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent The meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. by Chair Vicki Johnson. Agenda Item_No. 2, Consider: Approval of Minutes for May 12, 1997 Regular Board Meeting - Fierce asked for a review on wording on page 7 of 12 in regard to his KSB statement. Motion was made to approve the minutes as amended for May 12, 1997 Motion: Goldstein Second: Beyer Ayes: Goldstein, Berman, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Anderson Nays: None Approved: 6-0 Youth Parks Board Enters chambers for Item No. 3 Agenda Item No. 3,Demonstration:Action Request Tracking System-Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager, provided a computer screen overhead demonstration of the Action Request Tracking System to the Boards. Hugman described the system as being used to log and track complaints as well as various community requestssuch as for information or services. The system will also produce work orders from each action request, allow the work orders to be assigned, and allow tracking of an action to closure. In regard to Parks, Hugman explained uses may include complaints, various requests and work orders. Hugman explained that the system has been designed so that the first person that the citizen communicates their concern to may enter the request/complaint to avoid transferring the call, etc. Hugman stated that the system is also designed to allow the caller to be notified that the City is Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 1 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** taking action as well as inform the individual of when the situation is resolved. Hugman stated that the system currently consists of 50 databases, with the largest being the citizen database which has address and telephone number information. Hugman also stated that wherever possible, only standard information may be entered into the system. For example, N White Chapel must be entered in the same format each time to allow accuracy when performing the search command. There are also comment fields for action requests and work orders so that additional information and status chan be entered. Hugman proceeded to enter a name to show how the information/database is organized. Within the system there are several "drop down" menus such as types of requests. Hugman chose work order and proceeded to show how one may enter a work order and assign the work order to a specific employee with comments. Hugman also showed how the employee receiving the work order can update the work order status within the notes section. This will help supervisors and receptionists in tracking the status of a work order. Hugman demonstrated how one may sort by a primary and secondary field to search for information. Hugman explained that for the system to work well with each building (City Hall, Administration, Public Works and Parks and Recreation) the City's computers must be networked, which will occur within one (1) month. Hugman also stated that he is currently working with a consultant to obtain the necessary software to make the system Internet accessible. In answering a Youth Parks Board concern, Hugman stated internet accessibility must include security factors to avoid the public being able to accss the City's computer network. The Board took a break at 7:00 p.m.for SPDC to return from executive session. The Board returns at 7:03 p.m. Ronnie Kendall arrived at the meeting. Agenda Item No. 4, Administrative Comments - For information purposes Ronnie Kendall asked Kim Lenoir the reason for which the sidewalk ordinance was going to City Council Retreat this week if no decisions have been finalized in regard to the ordinance. Shana Yelverton stated that the Council will discuss issues regarding pavement management at the retreat since the City is reviewing implementing a pavement management system and the City hopes to include sidewalks into the system. Yelverton stated that the information was submitted as it was a request by the Public Works Director in terms of a maintenance perspective, but the actual ordinance be approved by the Park Board and then must go to P&Z for approval then to Council. Lenoir introduced Ben R. Henry, as the new Park Planning and Construction Superintendent who begins at the Parks and Recreation Department on Thursday, June 12, 1997. Fierce confirmed with Lenoir that Al Morin has received a response in regard to the lights facing Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 2 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Diamond Circle Estates and Lenoir confirmed that Morin has been called by Randy Chambers concerning status. Johnson inquired about an update on the Park Dedication Ordinance and Lenoir stated that Community Development is preparing further details which will be provided to the City Council when City Council meets on Tuesday, June 17, 1997. Johnson stated that the Board should be present at the meeting and be prepared to answer questions. Lenoir stated that she will make a presentation on what the Board and P&Z recommended. Johnson provided the Board with an update on the removal of the playground at Bicentennial Park next to the Community Center and inquired about the Brunson property. Lenoir stated that they are still waiting on the lawsuit which will take up to nine (9) months but confirmed that the property is the City's and work may begin on the project. Beyer inquired about the time table on tennis courts and Lenor informed the Board that SPDC approved the MESA contract which will go to Council next Tuesday and MESA will then begin the design work which will take up to three (3) months. Designs will then go directly to SPDC unless there is a dramatic change from the master plan. Kendall stated that she will report and provide updates on MESA's progress to the Board. Johnson stated that every Monday, 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. is set aside for the Board members to talk with Lenoir or Schaeffer about any questions,problems,etc. Beyer complimented the Park Staff and Maintenance Crew in regard to the organization and setup of King and His Court. Johnson and Beyer stated that the evening ran smooth considering the variety of programs occurring simultaneously that evening and Beyer commented on the excellent media coverage and explained how the event was a great asset to the City,Parks and Recreation and the Girl's Softball Association. Agenda Item No. 5, Public Forum- Chair Vicki Johnson opened the public forum. Joe Kendall, Box 92998, Southlake, stated that he would be referring to a budgetary item. Joe Kendall has been an inline hockey coach for about one(1)year and is concerned about the condition of the inline hockey court. Joe Kendall stated that the lighting and the surface of the court is fine, but the boards have deteriorated so much that they are a safety issue as they do have sharp edges. Hestated that no one has been injured but it must be a future concern. He understands that Bicentennial Park Phase II will build a court but he does realize this is up to 18 months (three seasons) away. Joe Kendall stated that the sport is becoming more and more popular and that he will be doing more publicity and is concerned that the court is not in compliance with ADA. In regard to hard data, Joe Kendall stated that it is being researched by another coach and the cost for new boards comes to nearly$25,000 total. Though the Bicentennial Park rink will be developed in the future, Joe Kendall stated there is a true need for action as this time. Kendall stated that Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 3 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** fiberglass boards, specifically designed for the sport, may be necessary and would assist in the avoidance of hard labor and lumber costs. John Gagnon, 1005 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake, inline hockey coach, stated that his concern is also from a safety perspective. Gagnon compared the court to Keller and stated that the boards at Southlake do have cracks and loose or pertruding nails where the doors swing open and where the kids go in and out of the box which can catch on the kids. Gagnon stated that the courts will continue to be used as a practice facility even with Bicentennial Parks Phase II court. Gagnon also stated that this court is the perfect size for the eight and under league games and he hopes that upgrades to the court will be one of the Parks and Recreation Board budget priorities. Michael Callfield, 1500 North Carroll, Southlake, inline hockey assistant coach, presented photographs of the hockey court. Callfield stated that the facility does have a lot of potential as a practice facility and a game court for the younger leagues removing the pressure from the new Bicentennial Park Phase II facility. Callfield stated that there is tremendous damage on the court: warped wood and cap rails as shown in the photographs, popping boards and seam and while the surface is in fairly good shape the boxes are incredibly small and may be moved to the side where the buses are fenced which would take pressure of the stand viewing. Callfield stated that the facility has potential for a lot of use but it is in need of repair and needs to be maintained and he hopes that the Board will consider this item and stressed the need for assistance. Fierce inquired about the age range that is using the court and Callfield stated ages 6 to 18. Kendall and Callfield stated that the present court is not within size regulation for all ages. Callfield answered the questions of the Board by stating that roughly 210 boys participate in the leagues and Kendall stated that seasons are in Sept./Oct. and April/May. Johnson inquired about the time of when the court was constructed, Lenoir stated three(3)years ago and stated that there is the potential to upgrade the court since the bus barn may be relocated. Johnson stressed the damage which has occurred within the past few years and Lenoir agreed stating that the general public as well as the hockey league use the facility. Beyer confirmed with the coaches that the optimum court is concrete with fiberglass siding. Joe Kendall stated that there are materials such as marine plywood that will withstand the elements and will last much longer than 2 to 3 years. Johnson requested hard numbers on this project for the next meeting since the Board is in the midst of budget. Tom Wilson, 100 Stonewood Court, Southlake, inline coach, stated his concerns are also safety and that he has caught many players as they stumble out of the box due to the construction of the box and the boards are a concern as they have removed splinters from the players hands. Wilson urged the Board to consider the safety of the children. Wilson stated that the court is a tremendous asset Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 4 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** to the City that should be protected as other city courts upgrade their courts. Wilson also stated that the rink will be of value even with Bicentennial Park Phase II rink since there are many times when the leagues cannot obtain enough practice time due to other games on the court and the younger players can use the court as their game court. Berman inquired about the potential growth of the sport and Joe Kendall stated that their promotion will increase this year due to postal patron mailings, etc. The Board clarified that the facility will be used as a practice and a game court. Berman asked if there will be a need for new courts and Joe Kendall stated that the new court will be primarily used by the older participants and the old court will be a practice court and a game court for younger participants. Chair Vicki Johnson closed public forum at 7:36 p.m. Hamilton arrived at the meeting. Sara_Brenn. eitters_chamherwith_Youth Parks Board report - Sara Brennan, Youth Parks Board reported that the Board decided on a motto and mascot from the nearly 25 community submissions. The motto selected is: "Where fun is serious business" and the mascot selected is an all sport type figure...the Sport Guy. Brennan stated that the Board also discussed working on the web page to make it more creative. Agenda Item No. 6,Consider: Eagle Scout Project to Build a Soccer Practice Field-Jeff Underwood made a presentation to the Board in regard to his eagle scout project, a practice soccer field at his church, St. Martins in the fields, located in Southlake on Pearson Lane. Underwood stated his knowledge of the City needing eleven (11) soccer practice fields for next season and stressed that his project would be one opportunity to build a field at minimum cost. Underwood stated that his church does not want to maintain the field but if Southlake entered into a contract of maintaining the field the City could use it Monday through Friday. Underwood's second concern is building the field since there is a fence which will be moved and restrung and then Underwood would set a mow date to review the growth at the field site. The land is owned by the church, but Mr. Hill-Pipes presently grows alfalfa and coastal bermuda grass which would act as a suitable soccer field surface. Underwood's third concern is watering the field and he stated that he did apply for matching funds of$200. Underwood stated that he feels the City and the church would benefit as there is a need for practice fields. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 5 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Kendall inquired how the cost of water is determined. Underwood stated that the average water bill last year was $200 per month. Fierce confirmed with Underwood that watering would be done for two months (July/Aug) to get the field established. Anderson inquired about Mr. Hill-Pipes and Underwood stated that Mr. Hill-Pipes sold the land to the church and the church allows him to grow the crops and Mr. Hill-Pipes has only asked for a week notice in regard to construction so he may move his cattle from the area and he has no problem with the church using the land as a practice soccer field. Kendall confirmed with Underwood that he is supplying the labor. Beyer inquired about the costs and Lenoir stated that the drainage looks good and that grading may be completed inhouse. Lenoir also confirmed to Fierce that coastal bermuda would be good practice field grass. Johnson confirmed the location as north of Snows Gym. Fierce and Lenoir discussed the watering capabilities and Lenoir confirmed that a City water reel may be connected to the meter and it would work well. Hamilton verified that the church does have a title to the property and Kendall inquired about injury and insurance in regard to non-city owned property. Lenoir stated that the city attorneys would work with the church attorneys. Kendall verified adequate parking availability and Fierce confirmed that the field would not be lighted. Lenoir stated that she will meet with the church representative this Friday and the contract may be signed off early or mid July and a letter of intend has been issued Motion was made to approve the project and project matching fund requests of$200 ($100 per month) which may come from SPDC matching funds. Motion: Kendall Second: Berman Ayes: Goldstein, Berman, Fierce, Beyer, Johnson, Kendall, Hamilton, Anderson Nays: None Approved: 8-0 Agenda Item No. 7, Consider: Procedureioraecreation Program Planning and Review - Lenoir presented overheads in regard to philosophy of recreation and sports programs, stressing the department's intent to continue with on-going programs and continue to improve the existing Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 6 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** programs as well as try new programs. Lenoir continued with Revenue Philosophy which includes contract fee based-programs, where the contract instructor receives about 80% of the proceeds and the fees cover the expenses (advertising, registration processing, etc.) city fee based programs, special events(Holiday in the Park, Fourth of July, etc.) and youth sports associations where the city does fund the maintenance and operations of the facilities. Southiake is one of few cities that do not charge the associations as it is a City philosophy that the money is seen as from the citizens to the associations for providing the youth programs. Lenoir confirmed that any costs by the associations cover the associations direct costs (officials, uniforms, etc.) and the money does not apply to maintenance. Berman inquired if the contract and city fee based program costs are equal or not and Lenoir stated that they are basically equal. Lenoir stated that costs are figured by comparing other cities and a review of direct and indirect costs to determine a fee for each program. Berman inquired about an 80/20 split and applying the 20 split to special events and Lenoir stated that this could be an option to cover expenses for free programs. Lenoir stated however that as City Manager Mr. Curtis Hawk believes that recreation is a city service and recreation program fees should not necessarily support everything 100 percent. Hamilton suggested that the youth sports not raise their fees any more by possibly cutting the costs of the uniforms. Johnson stated that uniforms just do not last for more than one (1) season. Lenoir stated that they are working on a contract for all the tournaments that the associations conduct where the money made by tournaments is put toward the fields and facility which is good for the City. Goldstein stated that he does not have a problem with his tax money going toward maintaining the fields for the community though the associations do dominate the fields. Fierce stated that the financial burden not be on the users of the specific sports (associations). Lenoir stated that we have expanded to three (3) seasons by splitting winter/spring to have three seasons/brochures: Summer, Fall/Winter and Spring. Lenoir confirmed that the summer season is the busiest and states the planning process by City staff and Park Board Recreation Liaisons for all programs follows this schedule: Summer programs, meet in March/April Fall/Winter, meet in June/July Spring, meet Oct./Nov. Lenoir states the final process as evaluation where the staff reviews the evaluation cards,records the responses on the post audit form and then the Park Board Recreation Liaisons review post audits as Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 7 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** follows: Summer, meet in Oct./Nov. Spring, meet in June/July Fall/Winter, meet in March/April Lenoir stated that programs are either dropped, revamped or improved depending on the evaluation and the liaison comments. Johnson stated that when the committee met, on several forms it had "instructor forgot to handout card" so we did not receive the evaluation forms. So, the liaisons suggested for those for which we are contracting with, since we are paying the contractor, they don't get their check until we receive the evaluation cards because we must continue to evaluate our programs to evaluate how we are doing as a department. Lenoir stated that this procedure has been added to their contract. Kendall asked who completes the post audit form and Lenoir stated Kathy Schaeffer. Johnson stated that she completes it from information gathered from the cards. Lenoir stated that the data is available to double check. Kendall states that is what she wants since she is an auditor, it bothers her since the audit form reflects how Schaeffer is doing in her job. Kendall stated that if Schaeffer is completing her own information, she is uncomfortable because it will reflect her management ability since the audit reflects on the program and on Schaeffer. Kendall stated that there should be some way to audit, possibly by a test sample or someone pulling data and checking the forms. Kendall said she doesn't like to state these feelings but she feels that the wrong person is completing the post audit forms. Kendall asked where are the numbers shown of how many people ask for refunds, how many programs are cancelled. Lenoir stated that this could be available and it should be tracked on the post audit forms. Kendall stated that someone should just look at the raw data that is used to come up with the forms. Hamilton agreed and Lenoir stated that there is no problem now since the staff is growing and something can be done. In the past only Schaeffer or Lenoir were available to complete the forms. Kendall stated that that would be great as it would be more efficient. Lenoir stated that cards are postage paid and directed to Yelverton and she initials and sends them to Lenoir who initials and then forwards to Schaeffer stating that everyone does see the data. Kendall stated that Schaeffer still summarized the data. Kendall asked the percentage of individual completing the evaluation forms and Lenoir stated 20-30 percent. Lenoir refers to the procedure draft. Kendall inquired if Success Strategies is part of the procedure and Lenoir stated it is. Kendall stated that she disagrees that the procedure of Success Strategies is followed and states that she has documentation. Kendall reads 3 of 5 that participants are notified of class changes and this information is documented in the class chart. Kendall stated that this is wrong and she has heard that notification has never been provided to some participants in advance. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 8 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Johnson asked if that is a city or contract program and Kendall stated that it may have been park or contract. Lenoir stated that sometimes the contractor is responsible for contacting participants and that it may not have happened. Lenoir stated that the Park and Recreation policy is to notify participants. Kendall stated that Robin Jones attended a family program dressed up and a cancellation notice was posted on the door. Schaeffer asked if Kendall was referring to the sweet heart dance and stated that there were eight couples who signed up and the roster shows that a message was left or that someone was notified. Schaeffer stated several showed and it was canceled since a minimum is required and some that showed may have not been signed up yet, but the roster is updated in regard to notification. Hamilton inquired about sending a preprinted post card to notify and Schaeffer stated the problem as being that they try to get the minimum and will cancel the class up to the day before as a lot of individuals sign up the day before or the day of the class. Johnson and Hamilton suggested working on a cancellation procedure such as a cancellation up to 72 hours before the class if the minimum is not reached. Hamilton stated she believed it was neccessary to call the individual and send a post card as answering machines are a problem and a message to another person does not always reach the participant. Kendall stated that procedures could be discussed all night and she does have a letter from a resident who does not plan on participating with any park activities in the future and the letter lists up to six (6) reason why and the resident can answer no to a lot of the questions on the procedure outline. Kendall hoped that tonight would have been the Park Staff stating that room for improvement are needed and the plan is to work on those improvements. Lenoir stated that there is always room for improvement and does admit there have been a few problems. Johnson asked if the letter is in regard to contract or city programs and Kendall stated she did not know if most of the programs are contract. Berman inquired if the letter is from Laura Miklosko and Kendall confirm this. Lenoir stated that if they are contact programs then the instructors have various responsibilities depending on the individual contract. Berman stated that her children were in several of the classes that Laura Miklosko was in and she did not agree with her letter and comments. Hamilton stated that as new programs are organized and more contract instructors are introduced, then problems will arise and that is why evaluation forms are provided to avoid using those instructors in the future. Lenoir stated that references are checked out and they are checked out with other cities and they are interviewed. Kendall inquired about the percentage of instructors that approach the department and Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 9 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Schaeffer stated probably about 70 percent. Kendall stated that scares her due to items in the news such as the Dallas YMCA. Lenoir stated that after the background check there have beenseveral instructors that were turned away. Schaeffer stated that if the instructor does work with children then a full background is completed. Kendall asked if there is always more than one(1) adult around and Schaeffer stated that it depends and usually there is an 8:1 ratio and there is only one instructor. Johnson inquired if the Board decided on only "two deep" programs. Hamilton stated they may have, but she knows they did speak about it for the after school program. Beyer stated that he thought it was for anything dealing with youth. Kendall stated that even at their church, one on one must be within an open room with open doors where someone can watch the instructor and student. Schaeffer stated that programs are either at the Community Center or at the schools. Hamilton stated that at some point they spoke about developing a policy and Goldstein said it was discussed last year in regard to not having only one adult with a group of kids and having two adults with a group of kids does assist in eliminating problems. Johnson and Beyer stated that two-deep must be imposed on certain programs. Kendall stated that situations will happen if they are going to happen but if it is in a policy then it shows that precautions were taken and there is less liability. Hamilton stated it may make it less likely to occur. Lenoir inquired about day programs in the Community Center and Kendall stated if staff can see in the room then two deep is not necessary in her opinion. Beyer stated that indoors, confined, closed door programs are of utmost concern. Berman suggested The Lodge on a Saturday as an example. Lenoir stated that if the class is more than 10 participants that there is usually two instructors. Johnson stated that the contract programs do need continual process improvement. Hamilton stated that ratios could be addressed in the policy of supervising children to read that for all children under a certain age, certain steps be taken to ensure that the proper person is authorized to pick them up and talk about ratio supervision, such as "two deep" instruction or a Parks and Recreation staff on hand to patrol the class. Johnson stated that Robin Jones has a registration program than provides a code to the child and the individual picking the child up must have the code. Johnson stated that the Parks and Recreation Department is working toward refining procedures and this type of program will assist tremendously. Fierce stated that the quality should be the same regardless of a city or contract program because the community assumes everything is Parks and Recreation. Hamilton stated that many will think of the program as being provided by the City since rules, etc. are provided by the City; therefore, schedule changes are the responsibility of the City. Berman stated that on post audit cancellation and refund reasons should be listed and that children are identified with some secure process when picked up from programs. Anderson verified creating a cancellation policy and Lenoir agreed. Berman suggested a refund policy and providing an evaluation form to the participant upon taking refund or have a separate card stating that we know you were unhappy...Lenoir stated that the refund policy is 100% satisfaction guaranteed. Johnson asked if Laura Miklosko had talked with Lenoir or Schaeffer and Schaeffer stated that she spoke with Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 10 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Miklosko and Miklosko only asked for partial refund. Johnson stated that if the customer is angry just immediately provide a full refund. Johnson inquired how class size is determined and is there anything that states a limitation on class size. Schaeffer stated that the ratio is not accepted unless the instructor goes by Parks and Recreation rules and ratios. Hamilton stated that staff should require a listing of names and numbers of those assisting the instructor with the class and Berman agreed. Schaeffer stated that the contract currently does not have that request. Hamilton stated that the item should be tabled and Johnson suggests that the committee meet again to review the details. The Board summarizes the changes as follows: supervision policy, ratios defined, cancellation policy, oversight of post audit and items added to post audit. Motion made to table the item and no action was taken. Motion: Hamilton Second: Beyer Ayes: 8-0 Nay: None Agenda Item No. 8, Consider: Procedure for the After-school Program - Lenoir stated that the staff has been working to put this procedure together and answered Kendall in regard to the necessity for the procedure that it is a state law requirement for afterschool programs. Anderson stated that the program sounds like day care. Lenoir stated that it is not day care and Johnson said it is not day care but it falls under the same general"umbrella." Lenoir stated that the bill shows afterschool programs are unique from day care programs, but it is modeled after day care regulations to ensure that such programs have adequate standards. Hamilton requested a change on the first page giving the responsibility to the Parks and Recreation Director and not the Recreation Supervisor. Lenoir stated that the changed can be made and Hamilton stated that she would feel more comfortable if it were changed. Hamilton inquired about the program manual which is referred to on 8-6, stating that each leader should receive this manual and asked if the Recreation Specialist is certified in basic cardiac life support. Johnson stated that they must be certified annually. Schaeffer stated that they must have a current card in CPR and First Aid. Hamilton stressed the working of basic cardiac life support. Schaeffer stated that the course is performed by the American Heart Association and is in conjunction with Red Cross Standards which includes CPR and First Aid. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 11 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Hamilton stated that basic cardiac life support is good for two years and must remain current so the wording should be changed to reflect basic cardiac life support. Johnson inquired about the change following through on 8-6, E and 8-5, F and continues to stress that the cards be current. Beyer inquired about Hepatitis B tests and recommends the tests be required and the Hamilton and the Board decline this recommendation. Kendall inquires about the age of the children in the afterschool programs and Schaeffer states the age range as 5 to 11. Kendall stated that she believes this program is day care and regarding recreation program philosophy, we should not be involved in"day care", but since the recreation liaisons agree on this type of program so the procedure should be in place. Goldstein stated that these types of programs were available when he was young and agrees with the afterschool program. Kendall stated that we are just providing a service to working parents and Lenoir stated that a large percentage of the parents do not work and the children prefer to stay after school and participate in the program. Schaeffer stated that up to 25 participants were present just because they like the program. Kendall inquired about the general time that the participants go home and Schaeffer stated that most leave at 4:00 p.m. or 5:00 p.m. Kendall stated that she feels the program is day care and that is not something the department should be involved in. Berman inquired about surveys and Lenoir stated that an audit form on the afterschool program. Schaeffer stated that some of the cards are still being compiled. Goldstein inquired about the types of activities provided and Schaeffer stated that arts and crafts, cooperative games, special guests and homework time is available. Goldstein said that it may be babysitting but it is nice to provide these recreation programs and that actually the school should be providing this type of program. Lenoir stated that Parks and Recreation began this type of program because there was a"third party at Durham and as our joint use facility we decided to be at the site at 4:00 p.m. and continue through the evening with programs and it solved a lot of joint use management problems and the program worked. Kendall said she feels the same about mom's day out and then asked what comes first, the need for the children to be taken care of and then the activity. To her it is not the other way around, not the recreation philosophy, but the needs of servicing the parents is coming first. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 12 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Hamilton stated that the afterschool care is something that is being provided to the child. Kendall questioned how and Hamilton stated that this program is better than having the child stay after school with no activities. Kendall stated that this is only her opinion. Berman stated that she would like to see some of the survey cards and see if background can be obtained such as if the children parents is working or if the child is just interested in participating in the programs since it is a great activity and the child would otherwise be bored at home. Goldstein and Fierce agreed that it is a recreation program. Johnson stated softball, baseball, etc. could be viewed a day care too; any program can be used as day care by some parents. Kendall stated that we do need the procedure if we are having these programs and Fierce agreed that we do need procedures and safety certification for all who supervise children. Fierce stated that a mixed message may be sent as this procedure states at 10:1 ratio and other programs are 8:1. Hamilton stated that the difference between instructional and recreation could explain the ratios. Johnson asks the Board if the ratio should be 10:1 and the Board agreed. The ratio statement was changed to read an average maximum ratio of 10:1. Motion was made to accept the procedure as amended. Motion: Goldstein Second: Beyer Nays: None Ayes: 8-0 Agenda Item No. 11 is moved up within the agenda Agenda Item No. 11, Discuss: Donations - Southlake Historical Commission - Aloha Payne was present to speak about the Fechtel House. Johnson stated that the cost figure to move the house and place on foundation at Bob Jones is $20,100. Payne stated that the house was built in 1919 and is worth saving the structure as one of the oldest structures. Payne stated that we have until August to make a move with the house. Beyer inquired about the house being structurally sound and Payne stated that the second story may not be completely stable, but she isn't sure as she is not qualified to assess the structure. Johnson stated that the Board has still not decided if the structure will exist as the nature center or not. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 13 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Anderson verified that the structure must be moved by August and stated that there is still vandalism concerns if the structure is moved to Bob Jones in August. Johnson asked where the $20,100 will come from and assumed that the entire project will cost $100,000 and Payne stated that they will be planning a fund raiser soon and Johnson said that the same problem,where to store,will arise and Johnson verified the Fechtel House as 1,500 square feet. Goldstein stated the problem of where to place the Fechtel house. Berman stated that the Board does not want to lose the house and Goldstein inquired about the state having a funding program to move the structure. Johnson stated that she is sure there is money but the one concern is where to store the structure. Berman confirmed the date of August due to Town Center and City Hall development. Fierce confirmed that development will soon begin even though TIF may not be in effect. Kendall stated that the Fechtel House location at Bob Jones has not been decided, but if it will be used as a nature center then the nature center committee must be informed. Kendall stated that a location decision must be reached. Lenoir recommended the five acre Noble Oaks at Continental and the new Carroll and the Board discussed that this location will be a more safe location in regards to vandalism. Hamilton stated that she will join Goldstein in working on saving this house and the Board agreed they must try to work toward this project. Goldstein stated that the plan should not be rushed and Payne stated that the Fechtel House should be restored for the era and Fechtel should be used with heritage park with the cabin and barn that is available in order to keep the historical value and historical appearance. Payne stressed that she did not want the Fechtel House to go to another city and Anderson stated that Bob Jones could be a problem. Kendall and Hamilton agreed that they would go to the site and survey and work on their decision. Goldstein stated that the nature center is something the Board does want to do and the Board should decide an appropriate location for the house and someone should provide hard data on property and time frame of construction. Goldstein and Hamilton agreed to work on this item. Agenda Item No 9_,Liais_on_Reports - Youth Parks & Recreation Board-Johnson-no report. Budget-Fierce-no report. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 14 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Recreation/Special Events-Johnson, Beyer, ..gsze - no further report. Community Relations-Berman, Kendall-Berman had no report and Kendall asked Anderson if he would like to be the liaison for Bob Jones. No appointment was made. Youth Sports Associations-Beyer-Beyer stated that he met with Schaeffer and Lenoir regarding the budget requests for soccer for wanting 11 practice fields. Beyer stated that he did receive the reports from Girl's Softball and Boy's Baseball. Beyer stated that the youger sports participants are the ones that are growing. Community Groups-Hamilton, Goldstein-Hamilton stated that she will be working with the Historical Society and recently she has assisted KSB with the wildscape cleanup. Hamilton stated that KSB is doing their annual hunt for Directors and she encouraged KSB membership. Johnson inquired if KSB is still searching for funding because Casino Night is looking for a recipiant for their funds. Hamilton stated that she will inform Lisa Stokdyk. SPIN-Fierce-Fierce stated that the last meeting was a joint City Council/SPIN meeting and both sides expressed concern for extended communication with some of the other Boards just as the Park Board encouraged recently. Fierce stated that he suggested David Baltimore as the Board looked at the Park Dedication Ordinance. Fierce encouraged open communication and suggested a joint meeting of Park Board and SPIN. Lenoir stated that she did speak with Nona Whitehead and Whitehead stated that the Executive Committe does want to pursue this joint meeting. SPDC-Kendall-Kendall stated that tonight they heard from Eddie Cheatham and Associations and his budget was approved by SPDC with one exception being the parking lot budget. Kendall stated that Cheatham will move forward and hold on the parking which was budgeted at $435,000 for 526 spaces including everything such as lighting. Kendall showed the drawing which has alloted 14 fields versus the 11 in the master plan. Kendall confirmed that this plan will be going to Grapevine/Southlake Soccer Association for review and that the total for Phase I Bob Jones is $1.5 million which includes all 14 fields, the pond and irrigation. The soil from the pond will be used for berms and to build up the fields. Lenoir stated that construction will begin within a couple of weeks and bids will be awarded in mid July. JUC-Hamilton-Hamilton stated that there has been no meeting since she has been assigned, but there is a meeting Tuesday,June 10, 1997 with the City Council and CISD school board trustees and issues will include joint use. Hamilton stated that the meeting will include discussion on the TIF and possibly on the stadium. Parks and Recreation Board Meeting,June 9, 1997 Page 15 of 16 **UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY PARKS & RECREATION BOARD** Hamilton stated that she would like to obtain more feeling from the community in regard to TIF and a stadium and Lenoir stated that joint use received 92% satisfaction on the citizen satisfaction survey. The Board stated the stadium should be of use for the Parks and Recreation Department and there are many benfits due to various programs which could occur at this location. Agendaitem No. 10, Discuss: Budget 1997-98 - Johnson stated since the hockey coaches came forward during public forum, the hockey court should seriously be considered as a priority item. Johnson review the highest priority items which where further prioritized as follows: 1. More soccer practice fields (6) 2. One ton pickup, trailer and gang mower for Bob Jones 3. Carrol Intermediate School Hockey Rink Construction 4. Registration software 5. New lights for field#1 6. New safety net on field #2 7. Fencing for Adventure Alley 8. Construct park entrance (street) improvements off North White Chapel 9. 24 passenger van 10. Joint-use equipment budget 11. Resod field #2 12. New lights for field#3 The Ranger Program was discussed as a budgetary item and the Board agrees that it is a program which should be in effect but at a later date. Lenoir stated that the priority list goes to the City Manager on June 17,1997 and then the Finance Department reviews requests and the City Manager reviews with each department once again laterin July. Beyer left the Board meeting at 10:10 p.m. • _enda Item No,12,Discuss:Joint Meeting with SPIN Standing Committee-July 24-Johnson stated that this meeting will be placed on the calendar. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:15p.m. Vicki Johnson, Chair Gary Beyer, Secretary Parks and Recreation Board Meeting, June 9, 1997 Page 16 of 16 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION IIIREGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING June 5, 1997 1 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Joe Wright; Vice-Chairman James Murphy; Commissioners 2 Ann Creighton, Rob Jones, and Lanny Tate 3 4 COMMISSION ABSENT: Debra Edmondson and F. C. LeVrier 5 6 CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Debra Drayovitch, Staff Engineer Angela Turner,Planner 7 Chris Carpenter, Planner Dennis Killough, and Community Development Secretary Lori Farwell 8 9 The meeting was called to order Chairman Wright at 7:11 p.m. 10 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 12 Chairman Wright opened discussion of the minutes of the May 15, 1997, Regular Planning and 13 Zoning Commission continuation meeting and the May 22, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning 14 Commission meeting. 15 16 Motion was made to approve the May 15, 1997, and the May 22, 1997, Planning and Zoning 9ICommission meeting minutes, as amended in work session. Motion: Murphy 20 Second: Tate 21 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 22 Nays: None 23 Approved: 5-0 24 Motion carried. 25 26 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#49) 27 28 AGENDA ITEM#3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 29 There were no comments from the City staff or the Commission. 30 31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#54) 32 33 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 97-023. SITE PLAN OF CHEVRON, LOT 1, BLOCK 1. VILLAGE 34 CENTER: 35 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of Chevron on 36 property described as Lot 1, Block 1,Village Center, and being approximately 0.934 acres situated 37 in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. The property is located on the northeast corner loiof the intersection of Village Center Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Village Center. The applicant is Chevron Products Company. The owner is T Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 1 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P& Z COMMISSION 0 & M Southlake Development. Six(6)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor. 3 4 Don Walker (Chevron Products Company), Atlanta, Georgia, presented this item to the 5 Commission. Mr. Walker stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Review Comments. 6 7 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked Mr. Walker if he intends to comply with Item#11 which stipulates 8 a minimum 75'throat depth, and Mr. Walker stated that they are revising the site plan to show a 75' 9 throat depth as required. 10 11 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 12 13 Patty Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, asked the Commission to deny this request. 14 She stated that Mr. Don Silverman promised her neighborhood he would never place a gas station 15 in Village Center if they supported the shopping center. She said that this is a dangerous location 16 for a gas station. She stated that there has been a breach of trust by Mr. Silverman. 17 18 Mr. Walker stated that Chevron was not aware of any other agreements when they entered into an 19 agreement to purchase this property. He feels like this is a good location for a gas station and feels 20 it will serve Southlake well. 0 Donald Silverman (T & M Southlake Development Company) 1593E Bent Tree Forest Circle, Dallas, Texas, stated that when he first spoke to Kroger and to the residents of Woodland Heights 24 about placing a gas station in Village Center, he told them he did not foresee it happening. He 25 recently asked Kroger how they felt about having a corporate-owned Chevron gas station in Village 26 Center, and they (Kroger) saw it more as an amenity than a disadvantage. 27 28 Commissioner Tate asked Mr. Silverman to clarify whether or not he told the residents of Woodland 29 Heights that a gas station would not be put in Village Center. Mr. Silverman stated that he does not 30 recall what his exact words to the residents were. 31 32 Commissioner Creighton asked Mr. Silverman if he requested the neighborhood's support by 33 suggesting to them that he had no intention of placing a gas station in Village Center. Mr. Silverman 34 stated that he does not recall gas stations, specifically, being a focus of discussion. 35 36 Dennis Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas, stated that he met with Mr. Silverman and 37 Sandy Avery in his own living room and recalls being told by Mr. Silverman that there would be no 38 gas stations. Mr. Minder stated that there has been a breach of trust by Mr. Silverman. 39 40 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 41 42 Chairman Wright announced that the Commission would go into Executive Session to seek the 4111 advice of the City Attorney. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 2 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 0 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#645) 3 Chairman Wright reconvened the meeting and asked the City Attorney if any action was necessary 4 as a result of the Executive Session. Debra Drayovitch stated that no action was necessary. 5 6 Commissioner Creighton stated that since there are so many review comments and since the current 7 site plan has been revised, she is concerned that the Commission is not in a position to properly 8 examine the site plan to see if it complies with the City's ordinances. 9 10 Motion was made to table ZA97-023 to the July 3, 1997,Regular Planning and Zoning Commission 11 meeting. 12 13 Motion: Creighton 14 Second: Murphy 15 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 16 Nays: None 17 Approved: 5-0 18 Motion carried. 19 20 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#800) 6 Chairman Wright suggested,since there seemed to be a major misunderstanding, that Mr. Silverman meet with the Woodland Heights residents again to discuss the Chevron case. 24 25 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA 97-024, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED 26 BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION), LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VILLAGE CENTER: 27 Motion was made to table ZA97-024 and to continue the Public Hearing, to the July 3, 1997, 28 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 29 30 Motion: Murphy 31 Second: Creighton 32 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 33 Nays: None 34 Approved: 5-0 35 Motion carried. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#844) 38 39 AGENDA ITEM #6, 97-053. REVISED SITE PLAN FOR CHRISTIAN MEN'S NETWORK: 40 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Revised Site Plan for 41 Christian Men's Network on property legally described as Lot 2R1,Block B, Ravenaux Village, an 42 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet • A, Slide 2120, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.97 acres situated in Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 3 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION • the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. The property is located on the south side of Ravenaux 2 Drive approximately 500'west of the intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Blvd. 3 The current zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District 4 uses. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The owner and applicant is Christian Men's Network. 5 Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one 6 response has been received which was in favor. 7 8 The applicant was not present for this item. 9 10 John Levitt (J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, stated that 11 he is the engineer working on the extension of Countryside Drive. 12 13 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 14 15 Rita Tavera, 200 W. Highland, Southlake, Texas, asked the Commission to approve this request 16 because she does not want the fence. She stated that it looks much nicer with the trees instead of a 17 fence. 18 19 John Larsen, 335 Ravenaux, Southlake, Texas, stated that he is in favor of eliminating the fence, 20 also. He stated that this applicant is not doing a very well at being a "good neighbor." Mr. Larsen 210 stated that the applicant did not screen the mechanical equipment on his roof. Mr. Larsen also stated that the applicant is not keeping his grass mowed, which is a fire hazard. 24 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 25 26 Motion was made to approve ZA97-053, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.1, dated May 27 30, 1997. 28 29 Motion: Murphy 30 Second: Jones 31 32 Commissioner Tate asked what would happen in the future if the surrounding home owners decided 33 they wanted a fence there. Chairman Wright stated that if the Commission approves this request, 34 the applicant is finished; he will not be required in the future to erect a fence. 35 36 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 37 Nays: None 38 Approved: 5-0 39 Motion carried. 40 41 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#1307) 42 • AGENDA ITEM #7, ZA 97-054. SITE PLAN FOR GEORGETOWN PARK, PHASE II: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 4 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION 00 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Revised Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an 3 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 4 A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.058 acres situated 5 in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. The property is located on the south side of East 6 Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 700' east of the intersection of South Kimball 7 Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial 8 District. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Corridor Recommendation is Retail 9 Commercial. The applicant is Realty Capital Corporation. The owner is Georgetown Monticello 10 Partners,Ltd. Fourteen(14)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification 11 area, and one (1) response was received which was in favor. 12 13 Richard Myers (Realty Capital Corporation) 2425 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 150, Southlake, 14 Texas, presented this request to the Commission. He stated that he has no problems with any of the 15 staff comments and intends to place a fence as shown on his site plan. 16 17 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 18 19 Howard Carr stated that he is in favor of this request but would like it to be known that he does want 20 a fence up. He has donkeys and is very worried about a child being injured by one of them. Mr.02Carr stated that he feels the builder has done a nice job on this project. Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 24 25 Motion was made to approve ZA97-054, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 26 30, 1997. 27 28 Motion: Murphy 29 Second: Tate 30 31 Commissioner Creighton asked if the applicant is asking for a variance to the articulation 32 requirements. Mr. Myers stated that he likes the way his building looks and would like to leave it 33 as shown. 34 35 An amended motion was made to approve ZA97-054, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 36 1, dated May 30, 1997, accepting the articulation as shown on the site plan. 37 38 Motion: Murphy 39 Second: Creighton 40 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 41 Nays: None 42 Approved: 5-0 0 Motion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 5 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION qi, (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#1553) 3 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA 97-055, REZONING: 4 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Zoning Change on 5 property legally described as approximately 5.63 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, 6 Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 5. The property is located at approximately 200' east of 7 the 2400 Block of Crooked Lane. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested 8 zoning is "0-1" Office District. The Land Use Category is Industrial. The owner and applicant is 9 Ken Smith. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, 10 and no responses have been received. 11 12 John Levitt(J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, presented this 13 item to the Commission. 14 15 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 16 17 Lowell Morrison, 710 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that he did not receive a notice 18 for this application, and he lives within 1' of this property. He stated that he thinks there has been 19 a mistake. Mr. Morrison stated that he understands that the bufferyard requirements will be reduced 20 since the applicant has reduced his zoning request from "S-P-2" with "I-1" uses to "0-1." He stated ithat he is opposed to this request because he just does not know enough about what the applicant is trying to do. 24 Bobby Struempler, 700 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that he did not receive a notice 25 for this application, but he did receive a notice for the preliminary plat on the entire property. Mr. 26 Struempler stated that he is opposed to this request because there is not enough bufferyard and 27 building setback. 28 29 Pam Morrison, 710 Whispering Woods, Southlake, Texas, stated that she would like to see a wider 30 bufferyard and a brick fence. 31 32 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 33 34 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked Mr. Levitt if he would be willing to provide a better fence and a wider 35 bufferyard. 36 37 Mr. Levitt agreed to provide a 15'bufferyard instead of a 10'bufferyard. He did not agree to upgrade 38 the fence from an 8' wood fence to a brick fence. 39 40 Commissioner Tate stated that an 8' wood fence is not going to look good over time; it will not stay 41 straight. He questioned whether or not the residential property owners might instead want a 6'wood 42 fence with plantings to equal the 8' of required screening. S Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 6 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION • Chairman Wright stated that he does not think the applicant can place that many plantings due to the 2 number of existing trees. 3 4 Commissioner Jones asked why the applicant changed his zoning request to "0-1" if the surrounding 5 residents want "S-P-2" with "I-1" uses. Mr. Morrison stated that most of the residents were happy 6 with previous request of"S-P-2" with "I-1" uses, but some of the Commission was not. 7 8 Chairman Wright called for a recess at 8:49 p.m. 9 Chairman Wright called the meeting back to order at 8:56 p.m. 10 11 Chairman Wright stated that he discussed with the applicant the possibility of placing a masonry 12 fence on the west property line; the applicant indicated that due to the length of the west side 13 (approximately 1,250'), he cannot commit to a masonry fence due to the costs involved. 14 15 Motion was made to approve ZA97-055, adding a 20' bufferyard along the west property line 16 adjacent to residential. 17 18 Motion: Murphy 19 Second: Tate 20 02Mr. Levitt agreed to a 20' bufferyard along the west property line. Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 24 Nays: None 25 Approved: 5-0 26 Motion carried. 27 28 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#2562) 29 30 Community Development Director Greg Last stated that it is apparent that the property owner 31 notifications for Agenda Item#8, ZA97-055, were sent to the wrong people. He recommended that 32 City staff renotify for Case#ZA97-055 on June 6, 1997. He stated that since everyone involved in 33 the previous discussion is still present in this meeting, the Commission can reconsider that case, 34 rescind their motion and table it to the next meeting. Mr. Last apologized for the confusion and the 35 error. 36 37 Motion was made to reconsider ZA97-055. 38 39 Motion: Murphy 40 Second: Creighton 41 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 42 Nays: None 1110 Approved: 5-0 Motion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 7 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P & Z COMMISSION 1110 Motion was made to rescind the action taken on ZA97-055. 3 Motion: Murphy 4 Second: Creighton 5 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 6 Nays: None 7 Approved: 5-0 8 Motion carried. 9 10 Motion was made to table ZA97-055 and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 19, 1997, 11 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, due to a failure to properly notify adjacent 12 property owners within 200'. 13 14 Motion: Murphy 15 Second: Creighton 16 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 17 Nays: None 18 Approved: 5-0 19 Motion carried. 20 42AGENDA ITEM#9,ZA 97-067,PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONECREST BUSINESS PARK: Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for Stonecrest Business Park, being legally described as approximately 43.69 acres situated in the 24 Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being Tracts 5, 5A, 11 A, and 11 B. This plat proposes 25 twenty-two (22) lots. The property is located on the east side of Crooked Lane and approximately 26 560' south of the intersection East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane. The 27 current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District, "I-1" Light Industrial District, and "0-1" Office 28 District. The Land Use Category is Industrial. The owners and applicants are Ken and Darla Smith. 29 Nineteen (19) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and 30 four (1) responses have been received with one (1) in favor and three (3) opposed. 31 32 John Levitt(J.E. Levitt Engineers) 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104, Southlake, Texas, presented this 33 item to the Commission. He stated that due to the situation with the previous case, he understands 34 that this case will need to be tabled,too. He wanted the Commission to know that he has a meeting 35 on Monday, June 9, 1997, with the Grapevine Public Works Director regarding Option B which 36 shows the south connection into Heritage Industrial Park. If that option does not work out, he asked 37 that the Commission approve his original request which is Option A. 38 39 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. 40 41 Mr. Levitt asked that this case also be tabled until June 19, 1997. 42 S Chairman Wright stated that he is in favor of the Option B request which shows the south connection into Heritage Industrial Park. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 8 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY & Z COMMISSION 410 Motion was made to table ZA97-067 and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 19, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 3 4 Motion: Jones 5 Second: Creighton 6 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 7 Nays: None 8 Approved: 5-0 9 Motion carried. 10 11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3473) 12 13 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided over Agenda Items #10 and 14 #11. 15 16 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA 97-056, DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF TIMARRON ADDITION, 17 VILLAGE J: 18 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Development Plan of 19 Timarron Addition, Village J on property legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated 20 in the Hall Medlin Survey,Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 21 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2,Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract S 3A3B. The property is located at approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. The 24 current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The Land Use Category 25 is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P. Six (6) 26 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses have 27 been received. 28 29 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this 30 item to the Commission. Mr. Janssen stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff 31 Comments. 32 33 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to 34 speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing. 35 36 Motion was made to approve ZA97-056, subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1, 37 dated May 30, 1997. 38 39 Motion: Tate 40 Second: Creighton 41 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton 42 Nays: None S Abstain: Wright Approved: 4-0-1 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 9 of 13 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION 1110 Motion carried. 3 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3626) 4 5 AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA 97-057, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TIMARRON ADDITION, 6 VILLAGE J: 7 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Preliminary Plat for 8 Timarron Addition- Village J,being legally described as approximately 56.817 acres situated in the 9 Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, 10 a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract 11 3A3B. This plat proposes eighty-four (84) residential lots and seven (7) common greens. The 12 property is located at approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East 13 Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. The current 14 zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The Land Use Category is 15 Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P. Six (6) 16 written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses 17 have been received. 18 19 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this 20 item to the Commission. Mr. Janssen asked for an exception to Staff Comment#7B regarding the 21 cul-de-sac length on Street B. 11111 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened thepublic hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to rP y P g 24 speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing. 25 26 Motion was made to approve ZA97-057, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 27 1997, deleting Item#7B subject to the fire department approval. 28 29 Motion: Creighton 30 Second: Tate 31 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton 32 Nays: None 33 Abstain: Wright 34 Approved: 4-0-1 35 Motion carried. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#3929) 38 39 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting. 40 41 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA97-058, SITE PLAN OF SOUTHLAKE OAKS. PHASE II: 42 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Site Plan of Southlake SOaks, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 10 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION 0 A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 1.8685 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. The property is located on the north side of 3 West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410'east of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and 4 West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial 5 District. The Land Use Category is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is 1709 6 Southlake Oaks, Ltd. Seven (7) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' 7 notification area, and no responses have been received. 8 9 Neil Kukerbaum, 16800 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. He 10 asked for a variance to Items #1 a (minimum driveway spacing), #1 b (minimum throat depth) #2 11 (parking spaces on the west side of the building),#9 (40' rear setback line) and#14 (loading space). 12 13 Commissioner Creighton asked who his potential users are. Mr. Kukerbaum stated that in Phase I 14 he has Henry S. Miller Realtors, First American Title Company, Metro Cleaners, First Eyecare and 15 a nail salon. He stated in Phase II, he has a Letter of Intent by a restaurant named Bailey's. 16 17 Chairman Wright opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 18 Chairman Wright closed the public hearing. 19 20 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked City staff how to properly accommodate Item #2 (parking spaces on Ailh21 west side of building). Planner Dennis Killough stated that it could be accommodated by filing an Mramendedplat or by requesting a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Mr. Killough stated that the easier avenue would be filing the amended plat. 24 25 Vice-Chairman Murphy asked how the Commission should accommodate Item#14 (loading space). 26 Mr. Killough stated that the applicant would need to meet the ordinance or go to the Zoning Board 27 of Adjustment. 28 29 Motion was made to approve ZA97-058, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30 30, 1997, deleting Items #la (minimum driveway spacing) and #lb (minimum throat depth); 31 modifying Item#9(40'rear setback line)to reflect the site plan as shown;and stating that the eastern 32 most building site is not included in this motion or in this case and will require a revised site plan 33 for approval. 34 35 Motion: Murphy 36 Second: Tate 37 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton 38 Nays: None 39 Approved: 5-0 40 Motion carried. 41 42 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#4940) 1110 Chairman Wright stepped down, and Vice-Chairman Murphy presided over Agenda Item#13. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 11 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION III 2 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 97-063, PLAT REVISION FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS 14R 3 THROUGH 21R, AND LOT 22 (COMMON GREEN 58), BLOCK 55, TIMARRON ADDITION, 4 BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE: 5 Planner Chris Carpenter informed the Commission that this request is for a Plat Revision for the 6 proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22 (Common Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition, 7 Bryson Square, Phase One, being a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition, 8 Bryson Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according 9 to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being 10 approximately 2.880 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. The 11 property is located on the south side of Saxon Trail at the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon 12 Trail. The current zoning is "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. The Land Use 13 Category is Medium Density Residential. The owner and applicant is Westerra - Timarron, L.P. 14 Thirteen(13) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one 15 response was received which was in favor. 16 17 Todd Janssen (Carter & Burgess) 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250, Dallas, Texas, presented this 18 item to the Commission. He stated that he has no problems with any of the Staff Comments. 19 20 Vice-Chairman Murphy opened the public hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to 21 1speak. Vice-Chairman Murphy closed the public hearing. 10 2 Motion was made to approve ZA97-063, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 24 1997. 25 26 Motion: Creighton 27 Second: Jones 28 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Murphy, Creighton 29 Nays: None 30 Abstain: Wright 31 Approved: 4-0-1 32 Motion carried. 33 34 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#5110) 35 36 Chairman Wright resumed chairmanship of the meeting. 37 38 AGENDA ITEM #14, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 39 Motion was made to approve the adjournment of the meeting at 10:04 p.m. on June 5, 1997. 40 41 Motion: Tate 42 Second: Murphy 0 Ayes: Jones, Tate, Wright, Murphy, Creighton Nays: None Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 12 of 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP& Z COMMISSION 4i Approved: 5-0 Motion carried. 3 4 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-05-97, tape 1, section#5135) 5 6 7 8 18 11 Joe Wright 12 Chairman 13 14 15 ATTEST: 16 17 20 Lori A. Farwell 21 Community Development Secretary • • Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 5, 1997 Page 13 of 13 I • SOUTHLAKE YOUTH ACTION COMMISSION (SYAC) 1996-1997 Annual Report to the City Council The Southlake Youth Action Commission was created in 1994 to generate broad-based public awareness and support for youth. This group was formed to act as the formal "voice of youth" in Southlake to bring issues to the City Council. SYAC also serves as a vehicle to familiarize the youth of Southlake with the governance process in Local Government. This year, there were 27 SYAC members ranging from 7th to 12th grades. This annual report outlines Southlake Youth Action Commission's accomplishments during this past year. Accomplishments: • Ropes Course - The Southlake Youth Action Commission started the year by participating in a ropes course in September. The purpose of the ropes course was to provide mentally and physically challenging experiences to develop trust, personal growth, creativity, communication, and self-esteem building. This was a great way to start the year by encouraging team work and leadership skills. S • Habitat for Humanity Project - SYAC participated in a Habitat for Humanity project in the fall. This project allowed the SYAC members to volunteer in the community by building a home. SYAC also prepared a basket of food for the family living in the home. • Southlake's 40th Birthday Celebration - The Southlake Youth Action Commission assisted with the city's 40th birthday celebration. In September, SYAC volunteered at the 40th Birthday Celebration for the City of Southlake. In May, SYAC members volunteered at the Fair & Kite Festival by assisting with the games and activities during the celebration. • Christmas for Kids Project - SYAC members assisted with the city's Christmas for Kids Project by helping at the outdoor Christmas Carnival. The Christmas for Kids Project provides food and clothing for needy families in the community. Volunteering with this project gave SYAC the opportunity to help the community during the holiday season. • Volunteer in Community Projects - Over the year, the Southlake Youth Action Commission volunteered in various community projects. SYAC participated in the Texas Trash-Off, the Senior Citizen's Dance, the Easter in the Park celebration and various recreational programs. • Youth in Government Day - SYAC held its first Youth In Government Day on Wednesday, April 30, 1997, which centered around a discussion of the issues regarding drug and S alcohol abuse by Southlake youth. The group first focused on defining the problems with students using drugs and alcohol and discussed possible solutions for the School District SYAC Annual Report Page 2 • and the City to consider when addressing these issues. SYAC representatives presented their recommendations to the City Council and School Board on June 10 at the joint City Council/CISD meeting. • Austin Trip - SYAC took their annual trip to Austin on April 23, 1997. The students observed the legislature in action by attending both the House of Representatives and the Senate in session. Representative Nancy Moffat recognized the students during the session and briefly visited with the group. The students also met Senator Jane Nelson and received a packet of information from the Senator. The final aspect of the trip included a visit to the Texas Supreme Court where the students observed two cases being appealed before the Supreme Court Justices. • By-laws - SYAC developed and adopted a set of by-laws to establish rules for the Commission to follow. The by-laws address a number of items including SYAC membership, attendance, officer elections, and meeting times and location. • Southlake Youth of the Year Award - In conjunction with the Southlake Chamber of Commerce, SYAC developed it's first annual "Youth of the Year Award." The award recognizes a Southlake youth with exceptional leadership skills, community involvement, and excellent grades. The award was presented at the Chamber's annual awards banquet in January. • Goals for 1997-1998: The Southlake Youth Action Commission has developed great plans for the 1997-1998 school year. The three areas of focus include Community Service Projects, Youth in Government/Leadership Programs, and Voice of Youth Forums. The following list identifies SYAC's goals for next year. Community Service Projects Host Sister Cities Dinner Fund Raiser to donate to needy cause Participate in two Habitat for Humanity Projects Sponsor a food drive and volunteer at a soup kitchen Participate in Christmas for Kids Project Participate in the Texas Trash Off • Sponsor a Campaign Month like Random Acts of Kindness Month Volunteer at a Ronald McDonald House Participate in a Native Plant Project Develop program for "Make A Difference Day" 4/./ • SYAC Annual Report Page 3 • Youth in Government/Leadership Programs Participate in a Ropes Course Attend programs to learn about Local and State Government Visit the State Capitol to learn more about State Government Participate in Leadership building programs Participate in a Youth In Government Day Program Voice of Youth Forums Hold two to three forums to discuss issues affecting youth of Southlake Sponsor Youth of the Year Award Respectively Submitted: Erin Anderson, Chairperson 1997-1998 • • City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Publi SUBJECT: c Works Request to Advertise;or700 BftSidelocated ids for the Five Million of T.W.T North of Kirkwood Ground Storage Ta �• King Rd, . ood Blvd. on the East BACKGROUND As part of the Cit tank has bee Y's water improve propose n planned for ions improvement projects a five traction on T, million gallon ground storage �4 Inc � smission tr W• King Rd. This tank will be fed e from Ft. Worth via Trophy Club. by a RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends a request for advertisement for bids for the construction of a 5 million gallon ground storage tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Blvd. on the east side of T.W. King Rd. be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council Consideration. CRE/cre Attachment: Location Map 5A-1 L. \)\1 sy Y1‘, Ig 111 5A-2 ` ` City of Southlake,Texas 0 MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Request to Advertise for Bids for the Five Million Gallon Ground Storage Tank located 2,700 ft. North of Kirkwood Blvd. on the East Side of T.W. King Rd. BACKGROUND As part of the City's water improvement projects a five million gallon ground storage tank has been planned for construction on T.W. King Rd. This tank will be fed by a proposed 24-inch transmission line from Ft. Worth via Trophy Club. RECOMMENDATION S City staff recommends a request for advertisement for bids for the construction of a 5 million gallon ground storage tank located 2,700 feet north of Kirkwood Blvd. on the east side of T.W. King Rd. be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council Consideration. CRE/cre Attachment: Location Map • 5A-1 J • PROPOSED BOOSTER TANK NO. 2 1 (----' / Sy ,i tirr __,.ii_____.,.._ L.7:,A t � -4 Duthlak 1 Public Works — Engineering • 5A-2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along E. Southlake Blvd., from S. White Chapel Blvd. East to Miron Drive BACKGROUND On November 5, 1996 the City entered into a contract with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line from White Chapel Blvd., along Southlake Blvd. to Miron Drive. This line is to provide service the southeast quadrant of the City and provide the volume of water needed at Village Center from a proposed water tower to be located in the Miron Addition that will be scheduled for construction in FY97-98. • The FY96-97 Capital Improvement Projects Budget included $750,000 for the 20-inch water line along Southlake Blvd. There are numerous utilities located in Southlake Blvd.'s right-of-way, therefore forcing the City to acquire easements. Funds for the 20-inch water line and easements are drawn from the Utility Fund with the Utility Fund to be reimbursed from bond sales. DISCUSSION There has been an increase in the cost of this project for the following reasons: • It was necessary to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway so the water line could be installed without disturbing the new pavement. • A change in valves from a "mechanical joint" to a flange connection to reduce future maintenance. • Installation of an additional 20-inch x 12-inch tap on N. White Chapel. The original contract price is $540,231.00. The result of this proposed change order will be a net increase of$21,185.00 for a total contract price of$561,416.40. 5B-I r • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line along Southlake Blvd., from White Chapel Blvd. to Miron Drive, to be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council consideration. CRE/cre Attachment: Change Order No. 1 S • 5 B-2 • CHANGE ORDER No. 1 Dated: May 16. 1997 OWNER's Project No. ENGINEER's Project No. 001-432 Project Water Improvements. 20"Water Line. N. White Chapel Blvd to the Miron Addition OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Water Improvements Contract Date: November 5. 1996 To: Wright Construction, Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By Ill Dated , 1997 Nature of the Changes: 1) Adapt 20"valves from M.J. to flange for$2,245.00 each x 5 ea. = $ 11,225.00 2) Add 20"x 12"tap at N. White Chapel for$3,030.00 each x 1 ea. = 3,030.00 3) Install 30"casing in open cut at Byron Nelson Pkwy.for$77.00 per LF x 90 LF = 6.930.00 Total = $21,185.00 These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to.This Change Order $ 540.231.00 Net(Increase)(Decrease)Resulting from This Change Order $ 21.185.00 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 561.416.40 • NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) Page 1 of 2 58-3 411) Contract Time Prior to This Change 120 calendar days (Days or Date) Net Resulting from This Change Order 0 (Days) Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 120 calendar days (Days or Date) The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham&Associates Engineer By Date May 16 , 1997 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Wri ht Constr ction Con r 0 By 44 Date // J~ —/ , 1997 F:\W ORD\SOUTHLAK\432\change.order I.wpd S Page 2 of 2 58-4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction for the Installation of the 20-inch Water Main along E. Southlake Blvd., from S. White Chapel Blvd. East to Miron Drive BACKGROUND On November 5, 1996 the City entered into a contract with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line from White Chapel Blvd., along Southlake Blvd. to Miron Drive. This line is to provide service the southeast quadrant of the City and provide the volume of water needed at Village Center from a proposed water tower to be located in the Miron Addition that will be scheduled for construction in FY97-98. • The FY96-97 Capital Improvement Projects Budget included $750,000 for the 20-inch water line along Southlake Blvd. There are numerous utilities located in Southlake Blvd.'s right-of-way, therefore forcing the City to acquire easements. Funds for the 20-inch water line and easements are drawn from the Utility Fund with the Utility Fund to be reimbursed from bond sales. DISCUSSION There has been an increase in the cost of this project for the following reasons: • It was necessary to install casing under Byron Nelson Parkway so the water line could be installed without disturbing the new pavement. • A change in valves from a "mechanical joint" to a flange connection to reduce future maintenance. • Installation of an additional 20-inch x 12-inch tap on N. White Chapel. The original contract price is $540,231.00. The result of this proposed change order will be a net increase of$21,185.00 for a total contract price of$561,416.40. • 5B-1 / F f I • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Wright Construction, Inc. for the installation of a 20-inch water line along Southlake Blvd., from White Chapel Blvd. to Miron Drive, to be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council consideration. CRE/cre Attachment: Change Order No. 1 S S 5 B-2 • CHANGE ORDER No. 1 Dated: May 16, 1997 OWNER's Project No. ENGINEER's Project No. 001-432 Project Water Improvements, 20"Water Line, N. White Chapel Blvd to the Miron Addition OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Water Improvements Contract Date: November 5, 1996 To: Wright Construction. Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By • Dated , 1997 Nature of the Changes: 1) Adapt 20"valves from M.J. to flange for$2,245.00 each x 5 ea. = $11,225.00 2) Add 20"x 12"tap at N. White Chapel for$3,030.00 each x 1 ea. = 3,030.00 3) Install 30"casing in open cut at Byron Nelson Pkwy.for$77.00 per LF x 90 LF = 6,930.00 Total = $21,185.00 These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to.This Change Order $ 540.231.00 Net(Increase)(Decrease) Resulting from This Change Order $ 21.185.00 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 561.416.40 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) • Page 1 of 2 5B-3 a/ r • Contract Time Prior to This Change 120 calendar days (Days or Date) Net Resulting from This Change Order 0 (Days) Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 120 calendar days (Days or Date) The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham&Associates Engineer � By ,e%4�f// —� Date May 16 , 1997 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Wri ht Constr ction Conn- r By • /1i /Date % J" , 1997 F:\WORD\SOUTHLAK\432\change.order l.wpd • Page 2 of 2 5B-4 City of Southlake,Texas 0 MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: MESA Design Group Professional Services Contract for Bicentennial Park- Phase II Construction Project On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the MESA Design Group of Dallas professional services contract for the Bicentennial Park - Phase II construction project. Phase II construction includes the construction plans for 12 lighted tennis courts, three basketball courts, two sand volleyball courts, an in-line hockey court, a concession/restroom/pro-shop, hike and bike trail, landscaping, parking, drives and berms. The fees are included in the SPDC construction budget for this project. The enclosed contract has been reviewed by the City Attorney, minor changes are being made. • Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to consider the MESA Design Group Professional Services Contract for Bicentennial Park- Phase II Construction Project. Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if you have any questions. es.2—__ KML • II 5-C e . . MESA DESIGN GROUP BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 1 PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: June 2, 1997 Kim Lenoir Director of Parks and Recreation City of Southlake 400 North White Chapel Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Project: Bicentennial Park Phase II Southlake,Texas SCOPE OF SERVICES The consultant will provide the following planning and professional services for Bicentennial Park Phase II—Southlake,Texas.This scope of services shall apply to Phase II. • DESIGN SERVICES A. Data Collection/Site Reconnaissance 1. Acquire digital survey and perform on the ground field check for accuracy; tie down metes and bounds;locate significant trees. 2. Visit the site and coordinate pre-design meeting with Park Department to review scope and program. 3. Perform environmental review/analysis. 4. Begin hydrology analysis/watershed review,collect drainage infrastructure information. 5. Perform site analysis considering all of the following elements: Natural Features Cultural Features Topography/slope Surrounding land uses Native vegetation/plant communities Utilities • Water character/drainage Existing structures/roads B. Conceptual Design/Master Plan 1. Define specific program and facilities desired; provide alternatives and options to staff for input. 2. Coordinate user input/review meetings during master plan phase and provide support • graphics as needed. 3. Prepare two conceptual design alternatives in freehand manner to include at least all of C:\Idwinietrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Puk Ptuae II.doc Landscape Architecture 3100 McKinnon Street/Suite 905 LB 152/Dallas,Texas 75201 214/871-0568 Fax 214/871-1507 BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 2 the following elements: (12)Lighted Tennis Courts Parking lot and drives to be determined Concession/Restrooms building(1) Pond or water feature if applicable Hike and bike trail In-line Hockey Rink 1500 SF Pro-shop Basketball Courts Landscaping Sand Volleyball Courts Landscaped Berms 4. Review alternative plans with Park staff for input. 5. Refine one conceptual design;prepare preliminary cost estimate with options. 6. Review with staff and SPDC for comment and approval. C. Design Development 1. Perform on the ground limited tree survey and topography survey for facilities to be • constructed. 2. Prepare base sheets on AutoCAD Release 13 at 1"40'scale for overall site and 1"=20' scale for detail areas. 3. Refine design of all recreation facilities such as tennis courts, basketball courts, trails, concession building,sand volleyball,in-line hockey,and landscaping. 4. Refine hardscape design;prepare materials palette for review. 5. Prepare architectural floor plans and elevations for all buildings and vertical structures; present materials palette. 6. Refine grading and pond development ideas,perform hydrology and hydraulics analysis. 7. Refine planting design;prepare introduced plant material palette for review. 8. Prepare preliminary utilities layout to include water,sewer and electrical. 9. Prepare conceptual lighting plan. 10. Prepare final design or provide cut sheets on all equipment for constructed facilities. 11. Prepare final design development plan on computer. 12. Prepare updated cost estimate. 13. Review with staff for comment and approval on periodic basis. 14. Other plans as required. 15. Review with staff and SPDC for comment and approval. D. Construction Documents 1. Prepare 100% construction documents on AutoCAD Release 13 with separate files for each sheet to include but not limited to all of the following: a. Site layout plan. b. Site materials plan. c. Site grading plans,details and specifications. C:\Adainlstrstive\pendpropl\Biccntenniai Park Phase II.doc 5-C-3 1111 BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 3 d. Parking and roadway details and specifications. e. Civil engineering and drainage. f. Tennis court plans,details and specifications. g. In-line hockey rink plans,details,and specifications. h. Sand volleyball court plans,details,and specifications. i. Basketball court plans,details,and specifications. j. Architectural structures plans,details and specifications. k. Site electrical plans,details and specifications. I. Water and sewer utility plans,details and specifications. m. Planting plans,details and specifications. n. Irrigation plans,details and specifications. o. Signage plans,details and specifications. p. Lighting plans,details and specifications. q. Trail details and specifications. r. Other plans as required. 2. The consultant will finalize all plans and prepare bid documents. 3. Prepare final cost estimate to make determination on alternates for bid purposes. 41111 E. Bidding 1. Consultant will coordinate all printing and bidding with City staff/purchasing department. 2. Coordinate pre-bid conference. 3. Attend bid opening. 4. Provide review/analysis of bids for City. F. Contract Administration/Construction Observation The Consultant will provide the following services during the construction phase: 1. Attend pre-construction meeting. 2. Review and approve shop drawings. 3. Perform monthly site reviews. 4. Perform final punchout. 5. Perform one year guarantee punch out. Note: The City of Southlake will administrate all job progress paperwork including but not limited to meeting documentation, review of pay requests, requests for information, change orders,requests for pricing,etc. G. Meetings The Consultant will prepare to attend the following meetings as determined by the Park and Recreation Department: C:\Adainistcative\pendpropl\Bicenteanial Part Phase ILdoc 6a 4 BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 4 1. Two(2)user meetings/workshops. 2. Four(4)SPDC Meetings. 3. One(1)City Council Meeting. 4. Bi-weekly park staff progress meeting as appropriate. SPECIAL SERVICES A. Surveying 1. Boundary Check-Utilizing the deed of record and surveys for the Brunson/bank tract the boundary will be located in the field and established for reference to the proposed site improvements. 2. Topographic Survey- A complete topographic survey of the Brunson/bank tract will be made to the boundary limits. A survey along the proposed parking area outside of these tracts shall be made in the field. Quality hardwood and native trees shall be tied throughout the property. • 3. Public Utility Coordination - Public utilities shall be contacted to confirm existence of underground facilities. The public utilities shall be requested to flag their underground facilities in the field. The markings for utilities shall be field tied as a part of Item A-2 above. B. Drainage Analysis,Hydraulic Studies 1. Preliminary Studies - Provide (2) conceptual grading and drainage studies to explore drainage alternatives. Preliminary earthwork calculations shall be performed to assist in making determinations regarding the final grading plan. The final grading plan may include adding ponds or alterations to limit import of fill material. 2. Final Recommendations- Recommendations will be provided in a brief letter report and a representative from the Civil Engineer will be available for meetings with and presentations to Southlake Public Works Department. C. Reimbursables The Consultant will provide the following non-labor expense items to be reimbursed by the City: 1. Soil Borings/Geotechnical Report Acquire four(4)soil borings to a depth of approximately twenty feet. • 3 . Other Reimbursables The Consultant will utilize certain non-labor costs, which will be billed to the client as C:\ldWinietrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase II.doc `D C -5 0 BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 5 follows. a. Photostats or photocopying b. Binding c. Printing-sets of construction documents for bidding and construction. d. Photography e. Mylars f. Delivery Fees g. Mailing h. Drawings not described in the Scope of Services i. Blue printing other than two sets of development design documents for the Owner j. Long distance telephone calls k. Mileage @.32 I. Travel expenses m. Other products and services requested by the Client and not specifically described herein. n. Facsimile o. CAD plotting 0 D. Services Not Included 1. Concrete testing for road/parking construction would be in General Contractor's scope. 0 C:\Ndainistrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase It.doc V 0. 4 1111 BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 6 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT PHASE II-CITY FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS(S1,350,000.00) DESIGN SERVICES A. Schematic Design Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00 B. Design Development Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00 C. Construction Documents Lump Sum Basis $27,000.00 D. Bidding Lump Sum Basis $6750.00 E. Contract Administration/Construction Observation Lump Sum Basis $6,750.00 SUBTOTAL DESIGN SERVICES S94,500.00 SPECIAL SERVICES A. Survey Lump Sum Basis $7,500.00 B. Platting Services Lump Sum Basis $5,500.00 C. Reimbursables 1.Soil Borings not to exceed $4,200.00 2.Other Reimbursables not to exceed $10,800.00 TOTAL FEES-PHASE I S122,500.00 C:\lellainiatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phase II.doc BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page 7 ADDITIONAL SERVICES A. Services requested, but not specifically included in the scope of service will be considered additional services. Modification to drawings,after approval by client,as a result of changes requested by client or other consultants will be considered additional services and billed at and hourly rate as follows: B. Additional Public Meetings Public meetings/work sessions beyond those specified will be charged as additional services on an hourly basis. Additional Services Hourly Basis: Principal $120.00 Associate $75.00 • Landscape Architect $65.00 Landscape Technician $45.00 Clerical $35.00 CONDITIONS A. MESA Design Group, Inc. may subcontract consultants in the performance of any services described in this agreement. B. MESA Design Group, Inc. does not act as General Contractor in any way, or accept responsibility for poor craftsmanship. C. The above described compensation for MESA Design Group, includes the following non- labor reimbursable cost defined as follows: 1. Photostats or photocopying 2. Binding 3. Printing-Thirteen sets of documents for construction • 4. Photography 5. Mylars 6. Delivery Fees 7. Mailing 8. Drawings not described in the Scope of Services 9. Blue printing,printing or binding for bidding purposes 10. Long distance telephone calls • 11. Mileage @$0.32 12. Travel expenses CAadminiatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Phaee II.doc BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II EXHIBIT"1" SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS Page S 13. Other products and services requested by the Client and not specifically described herein. 14. Surveying as required There will be a 10% Administrative Fee for all reimbursable expenses to compensate for bookkeeping. D. Either Owner or Consultant may terminate this contract with thirty(30)days written notice. Upon termination, Owner will be responsible for payment of all Consultant fees and reimbursables expended through the date of termination. E. Compensation for all services shall be paid in Dallas,Dallas County,Texas. F. Payment Schedule: Billing will be on a design progress basis at the end of each month. Submitted by: MESA DESIGN GROUP William T.Arterburn Principal Accepted by: City of Southlake Date Return Copy Enclosed C:\Adnlniatrative\pendpropl\Bicentennial Park Pt.,e II.doc MESA Design Group City of Southlake, Texas Proposed Schedule- Bicentennial Park-Phase II Construction Exhibit "2" TASK MONTH SPDC/STAFF JUNE a JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER WEEK USER 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 PROGRAM X X X X X X 2 SCHEMATIC PLAN X _ X X \_c) 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY X X X 4 COST ESTIMATE X X 5 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT X _ X X X X 6 PROGRAM EVALUATION X 7 COST ESTIMATE X X 8 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS-50% X X X X X 9 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS-85% X X X X 10 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS- 100% X _ X 11 COST ESTIMATE _ X X 12 PUBLIC REVIEW X X 13 ISSUE FOR BID X X 14 BID OPENING _ X X 15 AWARD CONTRACT X 16 CITY COUNCIL X X X X X 17 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION X projects\bicentennial park.xls • City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Amendment to Proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and Associates for Bob Jones Park Construction On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the amendment to proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and Associates for Bob Jones Park Construction. This amendment takes the construction project to the next phase in preparing plans for landscape, irrigation, parking lots, drives, and fencing. The fees are included in the SPDC construction budget for this project. Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to consider the amendment to Proposal for Engineering Services with Cheatham and Associates for Bob Jones Park Construction • Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if any havequestions. you (L/2 L KML • • 5-D 1il II j 1 I ,' ' II w II At I ' i V ' t V 1 i V 1 ,1 $ ti ItJ til '''l li 'ILI Att �� Q�sQ 8ation, 1cg, /11Lhag s�'ales,Lih:etiol a � ► Texas, p d fen d111�the work tour fig Will beg rdesign will be subcont be ponsible for the racted to � rfortned by Ms. Griffith'sforfirm,coordination ��Propose for the `�r � se that our proposal dated listed above, t0 the site gradingplans March 17, 1997 be amended to add the remaining currently being completed. Our fee for the remaining portion of the project shall be a flat fee, as before, of 9.8% of the actual Construction costs. The 9.8% relates to 6.8% for design, and 3.0% for surveying. This fee shall include compensation for any work performed by any subcontracting consultants. The construction budget for this project is 1.5 million dollars. Therefore, the total design, engineering , and surveying fees for the entire project, including grading, shall not exceed $134,000. This would leave $1,366,000 for construction costs. All remaining terms, scope of services and other conditions of our March 17 proposal shall be applicable to the remaining work to be performed. III 5--u -1____ ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 • Fax 817/265-8532 CHEATHAM III AND ASSOCIATES June 2, 1997 Ms. Kim Lenoir Director of Parks & Recreation City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Amendment to Proposal for Engineering Services Regarding Proposed Improvements at Bob Jones Park As you are aware, Cheatham and Associates is currently preparing a grading plan for the proposed improvements at Bob Jones Park. Our proposal dated March 17, 1997 pertained to this phase of the project. We have basically completed the grading plan and contour elevations for the proposed soccer • fields and related parking. The next step in our design process will be to prepare construction plans and contract documents for the parking lots and drives, water lines, drainage swales, landscaping, irrigation and fencing for the proposed soccer facilities. We are anticipating that the landscaping, irrigation, and fencing design will be subcontracted to Lauren Griffith Associates of Houston, Texas. Our firm will be responsible for the coordination of the entire design aspect, including the work to be performed by Ms. Griffith's firm, for the entire project. We hereby propose that our proposal dated March 17, 1997 be amended to add the remaining work listed above, to the site grading plans currently being completed. Our fee for the remaining portion of the project shall be a flat fee, as before, of 9.8% of the actual construction costs. The 9.8%relates to 6.8% for design, and 3.0% for surveying. This fee shall include compensation for any work performed by any subcontracting consultants. The construction budget for this project is 1.5 million dollars. Therefore, the total design, engineering , and surveying fees for the entire project, including grading, shall not exceed $134,000. This would leave $1,366,000 for construction costs. All remaining terms, scope of services and other conditions of our March 17 proposal shall be applicable to the remaining work to be performed. O S--D ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 • Fax 817/265-8532 t • Ms. Kim Lenoir June 2, 1997 City of Southlake Page 2 If this amendment to our proposal meets with your approval, please indicate by signing in the space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. F:\WORD\PROPOSAL\SOUTI LAK\Bob Jones.Amend.wpd Authorization to Proceed: Accepted this Day of , 1997 By: • Title: - D5 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Authorize the City to Advertise for Bids for the Grading of Bob Jones Park- Phase I On Monday, June 9, the Southlake Park Development Corporation approved the grading plan for Bob Jones Park - Phase I. The grading plan is enclosed. The proposed bidding schedule is as follows: Date Day Group Comments 6/17 Tuesday City Council Authorize the City to Advertise for bids 6/18 Wednesday Cheatham Bid Packets ready for pick-up 6/22 Sunday Star-Telegram Public Advertisement 6/29 Sunday Star-Telegram Public Advertisement 7/9 Wednesday City Hall/City Secretary Open Bids - 10:00 am 7/14 Monday SPDC Review tabulations and award bid 7/15 Tuesday City Council Review tabulations and award bid Please put an item on the June 17, City Council agenda for City Council to authorize the City to advertise for bids for the grading of Bob Jones Park- Phase I Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if you have any questions. KML • 5-E ' City of Southlake T City Council Meeting Absence j' • .c as requested by a Councilmember III � r If you are absent or plan to be absent from a City Council meeting, please complete this notice and submitt to Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary. The Home Rule Charter states, "The Mayor or a Council member shall forfeit his or her office if during a term of office, the Mayor or Council member fails to attend two consecutive regular meetings of the Council without being excused by the Council." In compliance with this requirement, your notice will be submitted to the Council and, if necessary, an "excused" absence will be pursued by the Council. 0 Councilmember: rd/h4,1tt. (/, Adzz,) Date(s) of Absence: 9tOtt- _ /97 C1✓ - -/u- / /9 97 Reason for Absence: tt--1 i'7 &Al S "Excused" Absence Requested: 1/ Yes No If you have any questions, please contact Sandy LeGrand at (817) 481-5581, ext. 704. For Office Use Only Date notice submitted: ,/ /LL'e, /`2 9 Excused Absence Requeste : ✓ Yes No Date Absence Considered at Council Meeting: gtzt,e_./7) /g 2 7 Council Granted "Excused" Absence: Ye No L Copy to City Manager III �I Copy to Mayor/Councilmembers C:\WPFILES\CITYSEC\CCABSECE.FRM City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-035 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-245 Rezoning/A portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 0.346 acres. LOCATION: West side of Miron Drive being approximately 680' south of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard and Miron Drive. OWNER/APPLICANT: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee CURRENT ZONING: "B-1" Business Service Park District 1110 REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Smock& Husseini JV, N.M. Smock, 1529 Lambert Blvd., Oakland CA 94602, undecided. "We do not know what the ramifications would be to our adjacent property with this zoning." P&Z ACTION: April 17, 1997; Approved (5-0)Applicant's request to table until the May 22, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. May 22, 1997; Approved (7-0). • COUNCIL ACTION: June 3, 1997; Approved(5-0)First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-245. 7/ "/ City of South lake,Texas 410 STAFF COMMENTS: The purpose for the rezoning of this strip of land is to avoid a split lot zoning classification within the proposed Lot 4R, Block 1 Miron Addition. This strip of land is the remainder of Lot 3 (Zoned"B 1") located between the land purchased by the City and the R.O.W. quit claimed to the owner of Lot 4 (Zoned"S-P-2"). The rezoning of this strip will result in all of the proposed Lot 4R being zoned "S-P-2". The City Zoning Administrator has waived the Concept Plan requirement for this strip and has informed the owner that a revised Concept Plan for the entirety of Lot 4R will be required prior to issuance of any building permit. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-035Z.WPD • • ... i•„ - Li 8.77 illim — .,,, ___ __- 1.1 , • _.. 1 , ,0 S.119.11,1'• 5A2 Ex r 1 N-1:: :7.."-: 80.1 Ac • - .LI .• 1 HALL - - I&IA ''•.--. ' •0." I -... / A-093 30. -... I &DS / • 3 t ...:...__ IA - RICH RD 10 1AL: 1111111 did Ill KY A-401 ct:IT • ' A..(-6, , . -7). .,.. <(' ,,.....- . t.1141111 . IA '</i. ..„.• ,i, 4 1 .1 I 5A4 5D1 I IIIR. /2.rv,t JIM 1 . ! )- .. .• .. THOPIA3-.MO. HAH z . cm Ina .:dimmr .. .. • .. .. g .-•f• • Eri -.. -3,...3. 7 ..• , .. . . •. : SURWY A-104 z I;„ill IMPIII 3 I i ./'. 2A 2 .MOEN. 28-....,.... -',...,...2----,, ,-----5,._,..-- 21) .--t-4.--i- .-. 1... 3 213IA 2CI 5 SC1 C l' ---- ,. 3A2 3A1 pirrall 1111111 • --I . ' ....%‘ 'TY -___ , w•lain r- Os III:C.,•ir.,....... \ HALL ..,,,-..._...-- gyi 0 _._._: •-- •sr orA... II Du Cil 3A 5- : _. 281 .4 . ._._._ ..---- ---- ,estarrHow. i •!,. i i i i \ 154- ----i -.__ I 582 58.20' gOil. ---- ,-- .___ • W.:IiBlIIMAA g !• iiiii. 5A ' INC$19 Acg— ': i 1 ; • ---• .. 2A • ! - ! i NORTHWEST PKWY5828 582A . 1 IIIIIMINI 18 .:-- NINIMMIESI tt_that„... . iiiiP- E1- •• EAST orr 1 0 0 30 2A1 • 12/1)! /-----Thi------\_..........,zzr_Tio ......,--.. I ,op.AR i .. I . 3 k 38 . • ,t ! Th 7.665 Ac r pti,'301 3 Ac f RAR N • 10- ,---6- . "4 5iiig------_11- 11..3A, 304 33 il t-, A i• AP 3,,....z.:(,.. 1709) I:E3 EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 2A21.-. 1 - — - -- - - - ,---.4D 2 a 832 18 i 1E2 L....4__ 33361, 4C 22 1828 28 2C '0---,d.:K14-i,,A,21.< : 2E dizrzra.5 IA --1 G°R13 i '-' -• - 15 Ac , 3D -7 mig 30.6 Ac :riZ 2A3A 7 2A2 'I 15 Ac... .. ....--_. .11 k I •••••-• 3 Ac 3D2 r A°I) -___. • \ 1, I A \ 7 14 ) ! 1 ,, ; ; -; -; -, ,, ,, .._ ' .-._.. iC 2A3A '‘. weir:. 0,: .-- /! .0 ,..•''. ' 12.09 Ac ,.1 '..--':-.;."'''...g% '‘ .! i 111 . 11 % ...., r...". 3 .. . •-g- 0 0 P . ' .- , J--4--- , . ., i ._.---- ID Is;.... ... \- :k 1 i l' i i ! .1 V .—.—( _ —.— .=, • i .,. X ,. 'Is, ! ! , i • ! , ! I ! ', 2 "fc OW 4E1 /I 4 r --. .- ;,- i , . . e. *-1-•'• . ,. , ._IT--,-r.i..j1.4._. . % ,„,,,,j g ._._._.__._._._ ........., .- i .‘ - • x 1. i ••-,,H r4 Ai i ,...: '. .. _ii..../0. •- •.- ,iip„.„-. . Jak.- - • 3.6 Ac ,- ...... 20 Ac .. 2 i ,11 1. ., II i 1 1 i E C, /, i i I ...., 1 1 rrS 110 ..... ...1 r.''':',...') ••••• ZO' i H i i i ..516L12... / 3D • .-. - .... . ......... ........• . I A ...,•••••• e AC ._. Ai , . -.. ,...--'-''' 1,,,i ' ---r --if. '; 6'4j'4A#I 1 EA- 6G i i ! 1 I rn S-S 1101 la I 20 Ac G i • i f-i 1 ID5A1 40 1B3 3 48 ., V. HALE.) ,...., _. 11) t , 3 Ac BAIA 6A1 i„ 11 4A RAWBOW ST. i BA1 A2A 24 28 2C1 6.15 Ac I 6.53 IAc t i!:'. 1:1 1,11. .} AZ I AIC ,. ! ! I ! ! 1! . 6A _ IA2 • . 683 68 G , IA 2C \ % fj•I - 6132 1 61 k 6E 9 •-Zil 16160 I 0.10. . 13.4 Ac II :- ‘\ IsArIA •-6F1 6C a ..-..„ F,A 43 AC TRACT MAP.01 • 1 \\ 6,- , 7 ii sg k Wile DONAL '1A1- i EAST DON TINO4TAL f3LVD. , .. I L 1 1 _ i ...--/ ---- ----,--''''''‘\ s SUR1rrY A-1013 - - i __ \ • - '. '. -2A2 , \ ''. ..___E6r7'-i-r-' ......7.---- 5 2AI I [11 6.3 Ac 0•111' .1-1A 1 !1 .i7:1...i _ •-•.‘,St - I r'.71'k. ., WO 1134A.1 BDOO ''s 1144 111141( CEI BBC ''''' or 11,086C1 le* 1045-2A"'" 'mat ,848 1 6 4 1_. 184 K-+ 1646 tom •rg . .164 " 1641417 -186N le.s -,184,5 ••5'IQ.. _.... 15,6 Ac 161 A , , \\ \‘. • s •..\\., \ ......15 382 181 O 1 R. EADES �Ei 6r ,!.), TR 6 01) lTR 2A AU SURVEY 481 �� 2 . 11 • .o?6 4 ( L 53.497 AC lR 7A7 493 0 18 .185 0 ,( •u3 160 1A1/ '" 2A Y� �° A 1 R .047 O O� 1.522 AC 6 1.03 AC 51 AC 1A 25R1 1515 1.00 AC / 2.07 0 R 28• • j r'° t.vz % .607 0 • ��'� OAS 4A .ti= .`� ,, ORB 1.741 0 .50 0 .,. ,A �." r--fi is 'X ,,, SF-1 A S-P-2 1 12.622 AC ' \2C 25R2 b • 4C ' , 1 l R O�16 I .06 0 1.001 0 4,0CK&HUSSEINI 2 (OV M.SCHELLING �877 • D.LIGHT me O-1 /— Z.- - 1.— - . . 1 • 24 2.958.0 - 13c - • o (it) 3C1 i Z 3 B-1 J.ADDOCK 1 .S.00 , I ..91 i ,3Se i M.SCHELLING 23 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE I - , \ . _ - 6o i • t (Di 4 N 1u 122 ,,. 11. N. l,. 171 101 16 17 - 18 13 19 k 20 R 21 ! 22 R 23 I / +. 26 . ' ills LL2 uji 1�4 ( 24 22 1 1N lU ,1. 1,� n �O WESTMONT CT 5 ,a lu 41 71 11/ 117 117 1 . ±1 , „ , , au au MU t . 33 .32 31 It 30ficiaS29 g 28 Y 27 3 *26 ' 1 25 I AT jai . . . , lip IC ; • 1,13 ADJACENT OWNERS 37 38 39 i I._ AND ZONING 6 36 mg '' ''� > "' SPIN #8 PATTIE MINDER 9 1 FOI • IN , 161 - N „s 2 Ar ggz au I ,3,1 I ail L7,3,2 r, t, 07 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-245 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MIRON ADDITION, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.346 ACRES IN THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 529,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH LIMITED "B-2" COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING • THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "B-1" Business Service Park District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-245.W PD Page 1 • changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those 0 who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City S of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD Page 2 • Being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Miron Addition, and being approximately 0.346 acres of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "B-1" Business Service Park District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District uses, excluding the following uses: 25.2a(2) Auto painting facilities; 25.2a(3) Automobile and motorcycle sales/rental; 25.2a(4) Automobile repair/service; muffler shops; oil and lube shops; 25.2a(5) Boat sales, service, repair; recreational vehicle sales; 25.2a(6) Builder's supply, stores, outlets; all materials contained within the building; 25.2a(7) Bus station; 25.2a(10) Farm implement sales and service; 25.2a(18) Retail activity of a service nature; 25.2a(19) Retail uses related to the principal uses. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above S described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. IIISection 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD Page 3 • of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SSection 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. S MAYOR L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-245.WPD Page 4 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-245.W PD Page 5 • EXHIBIT "A" COMMENCING at a 5/8" iron pin found at the Southwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 1 of said Miron Addition, said iron pin also being on the North line of Oak Tree Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2121 PRTCT, said iron pin also being the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Vol. 388-156, Pg. 12 PRTCT; THENCE N 00°08'52" E along the East line of Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, a distance of 255.62 feet to a 5/8 iron pin found for the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract; THENCE N 00°08'52" E along the East line of said Lot 1, Block 1 of Gorbutt Addition, a distance of 33.92 feet; THENCE N 89°58'04" E, a distance of 463.11 feet to the Point of Curvature of a non-tangent • circular curve to the left having a radius°of�75.00 feet and a central angle of 35°25'14" and being subtended by a chord which bears S 41 56 56 W, 45.63 feet; THENCE Southerly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 46.37 feet; THENCE S 89°58'04" W, a distance of 432.70 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING and containing 15,084 square feet or 0.346 acres of land. S L.\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-245.W PD Page 6 rl 2- 1n City of South lake, Texas MEMORANDUM • June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Second Reading, Ordinance No. 480-Y, Personal Care Facilities Attached is the same draft of Ordinance No.480-Y recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission with a(6-1) vote. The dissenting Commissioner, Lanny Tate, felt that the ordinance did not provided enough housing units per acre to make the project viable to the developer, especially at the cost of non-residential properties in Southlake today. On June 3, the City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance on their consent agenda with a(5-0) vote. History The Council declared a moratorium on personal care facilities ("assisted living facilities") on December 3, 1996 as a result of the Kingsley Place application. This case raised certain issues (e.g., adjacency to residential properties, traffic, parking, institutional appearance, density, and the appropriate method of approval(straight zoning or SUP). The Council directed Staff to prepare an ordinance revision addressing these concerns and to seek the Commission's recommendation. The Commission has struggled for four months with the appropriate district(s) in which to place these . . . . . . . . . . . . . with of facilities. They have looked at permitting these facilities in all nonresidential districts with an SUP, have considered creating separate districts (e.g., Retirement Village and Personal Care Facilities), but have come full-circle and recommended limited nonresidential districts (i.e., C-1, C-2) with an SUP. Section 1 This ordinance adds four (4) new definitions. Note that the new definition of open space replaces the current definition [i.e., "an area included in any side, rear or front yard or any unoccupied space on the lot that is open and unobstructed to the sky except for the ordinary projections or cornice eaves or porches"] and will be applicable to all references throughout the ordinance with the exception of the PUD district which defines "Common Open Space" in Section 30.10 specifically for that section as does the MF-2 district which defines "Usable Open Space" in Section 17.6 specifically for multi-family development. This ordinance also establishes a definition of impervious coverage. Section 2 This section indicates that personal care facilities may be permitted only by SUP and only with the following underlying zoning districts: C-1 and C-2 and with the criteria addressed in Section 3. Section 3 The Commission has attempted to balance the impact of this institutional use on adjacent residential properties while providing certain criteria that enhances the quality of life of the residents of these facilities. Note that the Maximum Density is twelve (12) housing units per acre with a required twenty percent(20%) open space. This density mirrors the MF-2 (multi-family) density currently in place in the ordinance. The parking requirement was reduced from "the greater of 1 space per each 3 beds or 1 space per individual dwelling (housing) unit" to 10 spaces (to accommodate staff) + 1.5 spaces per each 3 beds. —1r I For a sixty-bed facility,the current ordinance requires 60 spaces and the proposed ordinance would require 411)40 spaces. The reduction is recommended because many of the residents of these facilities are not likely to have a vehicle on site because the average age of the residents is 86 years. Public Comments: Dick Johnston of the Senior Advisory Committee expressed the need for these types of facilities for the residents of Southlake and the surrounding communities. He also noted the need for retirement housing and convalescent facilities as well. He made several general comments about the ordinance that I said I would pass along to you. Under General Criteria, he did not understand why these facilities had to be contiguous to the roadways mentioned, but felt that these facilities could be located behind shopping centers or office complexes and thereby act as a transition from the more intensive use on the roadway. Under Lot Area, he felt that the five-acre minimum was excessive if the facility was a single-story structure, but could understand the larger lot requirement if it were two+ stories. Under Maximum Density, he stated that he appreciated the Commission's attention to quality of life issues, but would like to remind the Commission that the typical resident of these facilities probably wouldn't be taking advantage of all the open space, but would be happy with small gardens and benches close to the facility rather than open spaces and walking paths located at a greater distance from the facility. al--- KPG S S r1 I-a • ORDINANCE NO. 480-Y AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480,AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS; AMENDING THE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS SECTION BY ADDING PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES;ADDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS FOR PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local.Government Code; and • WHEREAS, the city has adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the city; and WHEREAS,the city council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests of the city to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents by amending Ordinance No. 480 as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the city council has determined that for the protection of residents living in personal care facilities, the minimum standards shall be those standards set forth in the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247 and administered by the Texas Department of Human Services; and WHEREAS, the city council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: L CTYDOC S ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 1 • • SECTION 1. Section 4, "Definitions," of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding definitions for"Housing Unit," "Impervious Coverage," and "Personal Care Facility," by deleting the current definition of "Open Space"and by adding the new definition of"Open Space" thereto: Housing Unit-A room or group of rooms used by one or more individuals living separately from others in the structure, with direct access to the outside or to a public hall and shall contain separate bathroom facilities and may contain separate kitchen facilities. Impervious Coverage-the combined area occupied by all principal and accessory buildings, structures, and paved parking, sidewalks, and driveway areas. Open Space- an area of a lot either left in a natural state or receiving permeable vegetative landscape treatment (e.g., ponds and lakes, either natural or manmade, and water features, grass, shrubs, flowers, trees, ground cover, etc.). Personal Care Facility - an establishment that furnishes, in one or more facilities, food and shelter to four or more persons who are unrelated to the proprietor of the establishment; and provides personal care services; and in addition, provides minor • treatment under the direction and supervision of the resident's attending physician licensed by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, or services which meet some need beyond basic provision of food, shelter, and laundry. Incidental uses and/or services may include protective supervision, personal care, social and recreational services, transportation services, private or common kitchen/dining facilities, so long as such services are provided to residents only." SECTION 2. Section 45.1 (38),"Specific Use Permits"of Ordinance No. 480,as amended,is hereby added to read as follows: "39. Personal care facilities, subject to the require- C-1,C-2 ments set forth in Section 45.9 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. Section 45.9, "SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES," of • Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby added to read as follows: L\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONINGW80Y.6 ORD 2 76- ul S General Criteria • All personal care facilities shall be situated contiguous to the following roadway classifications, as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan: freeway, principal arterial, arterial or collector. This requirement is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading without a requirement to divert traffic through traditional residential streets. • Personal care facilities shall meet all applicable city codes. • Personal care facilities shall meet the licensing requirements of the Texas Department of Human Services. Required Amenities In an effort to maintain a comfortable lifestyle for the residents and for the convenience of the employees and the residents' guests,the following amenities shall be required: Cafeteria and/or dining room,housekeeping service; furnish or provide transportation to local facilities that provide a library, game room, and exercise room. Permitted Amenities In an effort to enhance the residents' quality of life, certain other special facilities and services for residents, employees and guests are encouraged(e.g., chapel, swimming • pool,Jacn77i, home theater, arts and crafts facilities, greenhouse, and related uses). Permitted Ancillary Uses The following ancillary uses shall be permitted by right to provide on-site goods and services for residents and their guests, but are not intended for use by the general public: • Snack bar with a maximum of 350 square feet per 100 dwelling units; • Beauty or barber shop with a maximum of 250 square feet per 100 dwelling units or a maximum of 450 square feet per 100 dwelling units for combined operations; • Convenience retail shop with a maximum of 350 square feet per 100 dwelling units to provide for the sale of food items, non-prescription drugs, small household items, and gifts. • Pharmacy for resident use only. • Medical treatment services for resident use only (e.g.. physical therapy services, inhalation therapy, and other related uses). Concept Plan Requirements In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 41 of this ordinance, the applicant shall also provide: S . A letter describing the facility's services,amenities,and ancillary uses(e.g., level • of daily patient care and housekeeping, recreational, and support services available), the type of proposed building(s), including the type of facade and the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 3 9 I)-5 • number of stories, and the proposed number of occupants and service personnel; • A floor plan and list of intended uses and the percentage of total floor area that each use will occupy. Development Regulations The following standards and regulations shall apply unless a more stringent standard is required by the underlying zoning district or the Corridor Overlay Zone (in which case, the more stringent regulation shall apply): • Height: No building or structure shall exceed one (1) story, nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height if located within one hundred(100) feet of property zoned as single family residential or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land use plan. Buildings and structures located more than 100' from property zoned as single family residential or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land use plan shall be governed by the height regulations of the underlying zoning district. • Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet, except • where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land use plan, there shall be a front yard of not less than forty (40) feet. • Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than thirty (30) feet, except where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land use plan, there shall be a side yard of not less than one hundred (100) feet. • Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than forty (40) feet, except where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential or designated as low or medium density residential on the city's land use plan, there shall be a rear yard of not less than one hundred (100) feet. • Maximum All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not Lot Coverage: exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area. • Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall be two hundred seventeen • thousand eight hundred (217,800) square feet, being five acres. L:\CTYDOCS'.ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 4 • • Floor Area: Each housing unit shall have a minimum floor area based on the unit type: • 350 s.f. for efficiency unit • 450 s.f. for one-bedroom unit • 550 s.f. for two-bedroom unit • Maximum The maximum number of housing units per acre shall be twelve (12) Density: provided at least twenty (20) percent of the lot area is devoted to open space. • Impervious The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed seventy(70)percent Coverage: of the total lot area if(12) housing units are developed. • Bufferyards: Bufferyards shall be required in accordance with the underlying zoning district and corridor overlay zone bufferyard requirements. • Interior Interior landscaping shall be required in accordance with the current Landscaping landscaping ordinance and corridor overlay zone requirements. Area: • Parking: Ten (10) spaces plus 1.5 spaces per each 3 beds. III Licensing • Every Personal Care Facility shall be licensed by the Texas Department of Human Services as required by the Personal Care Facility Licensing Act, Section 247.021, Tex. Health and Safety Code, V.T.C.A. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, • sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 5 Sjudgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 6. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 7. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all • violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning yard regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 8. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. S L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 6 r fi.;...e • SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. • PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\ZONING\480Y-6.ORD 7 • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZONING\480Y-6.ORD 8 C-l1)0 till City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: SECOND READING - Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-G Draft Three Dated June 9, 1997 (2:46pm) To follow is draft three of Ordinance No. 483-G, second reading, amending the Subdivision Ordinance to generally reflect the following changes: 1. References throughout changed from"Zoning Administrator" to the generic "City." 2. References changed which were impacted by the recently adopted Thoroughfare Plan. 3. Preliminary water, sewer, and drainage plan requirements changed to allow the City Engineer to maintain a list of requirements and to waive the requirements where it does not provide a benefit to the city. 4. The"Amended Plat"qualifications and review processes changed to align with the state law S provisions which were adopted a couple years ago. This allows for more staff review of items where there are no new roads, no increase in the number of lots, etc. This draft also reflects changes in format to ordinance form, discussions from the first reading, and additional comments from Councilmember Harris regarding better wording in certain sections. You will also note changes have been made on pages 9 and 10 (re: amended plat processing) which accurately reflect the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation on those sections (these changes are in italic redline and italic strikeout text). These items were shown incorrectly on the first reading. Feel free to contact me, Dennis Killough, or Chris Carpenter if you have any questions. GL/cic q.... S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF \SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 1 of 15 76— 1 • ORDINANCE NO. 483-G AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS; ADDING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING AMENDED PLATS; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES; PROVIDING RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS THAT CONFORM TO THE CURRENTLY ADOPTED MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and 4110 WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483 as the Subdivision Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, certain changes in State law have been enacted since the adoption of Ordinance No. 483, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions and has recommended adoption of the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483 as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance as required by law; • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 2 of 15 -7C- 2 IIINOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding the following definition: COMMON AREA: private lot owned and maintained by the Home Owners Association. SECTION 2. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by modifying the following definition: PLAT, AMENDED: A plat which meets the procedures and requirements as set forth in Section 212 of the Local Government Code. SECTION 3. Item 4, Paragraph B, Section 2.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Any resubdivision of existing platted lots shall require the submittal and approval of • a Plat Revision or an Amended Plat as authorized by state law. SECTION 4. Paragraph A, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Application: All Plats to be considered for approval under this ordinance shall be submitted to the City along with a completed application and fees and must be in accordance with all ordinance requirements. No plat shall be formally accepted for review by the City until it fulfills all of the requirements of this ordinance. Any plat not meeting these requirements shall be deemed an inadequate submittal and shall not be processed until all submittal requirements are met. SECTION 5. Paragraph B, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Reproductions: Requirements for blueprints and mylars for all submittals shall be maintained by the City . It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to verify the number of prints and mylars required for all submittals. Prints should be folded in a manner such that the title block and location map shall be easily read from the outside and have folded dimensions as required by the City. (See appendix for "preferred" title block format) S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 3 of 15 —IC--; • SECTION 6. Paragraph E, Section 3.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Time of Filing. The City will establish a timetable for the filing of plats and other applications under this ordinance. The timetable will allow sufficient time in order to comply with necessary notice requirements and reasonable staff review of any plat or application. No plat or other application shall be officially accepted for filing except on a scheduled filing deadline. A plat will not be accepted for filing unless all required drawings, exhibits, studies or other required documentation has been submitted. A partial filing shall not be considered a filing of record activating the thirty (30) day review period. SECTION 7. Item 7, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety and the remaining items are renumbered accordingly. SECTION S. Subitem a, Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: a. Preliminary Drainage Study: A preliminary drainage study shall be submitted with any plat referenced in this section. This study shall • include all information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to adequately protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the applicant and any property impacted by the proposal. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to require or waive all or a portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best interest of the public. SECTION 9. Subitem b, Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: b. Preliminary Water and Sewer Utility Plans: A preliminary water and sewer utility plan shall be submitted with any plat referenced in this section. This plan shall include all information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to adequately protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the applicant and any property impacted by the proposal. The City Engineer shall have the ability to evaluate the need discretion to require or waive all or a portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best • interest of the public. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFC3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 4 of 15 • SECTION 10. Item 34, Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding a new subitem c as follows: c. Traffic Impact Analysis: A Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted with a preliminary plat application. The City Engineer or Community Development Director or their representative shall have the discretion to require or may waive all or a portion of the requirement for the TIA upon submittal of sufficient support that the impact threshold established in the driveway ordinance,as amended,will not be reached with the submittal. SECTION 11. Item 17, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Two boundary corners geo-referenced by state plane coordinates in accordance with Section 8.03(B). SECTION 12. Item 25, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: • Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order, which shall include common areas, if any. SECTION 13. Item 31, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Reproducible acknowledgments, owner's & lienholder's dedication and endorsements,to include ratification by all lienholders expressing that all dedications are free and clear of liens and encumbrances, and surveyor's certifications in accordance with the format shown in the appendices herein(see appendix). SECTION 14. Subitem a, Item 39, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: a. Complete and corrected preliminary water and sewer layout. This may be combined with the drainage study and should show all intended easements. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to require have plans referenced in this item anti or waive all or a portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best interest of the public. S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFf\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFC3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 5 of 15 lc--S • SECTION 15. Subitem b, Item 39, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: b. Final Drainage Study: A final drainage study shall be submitted with any plat referenced in this section. This study shall include all information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to adequately protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the applicant and any property impacted by the proposal. The City Engineer shall have the discretion to require havc thc ability to cvaluatc thc nccd for this final drainage study and or waive all or a portion of the requirements where in his/her opinion the benefit received by the submittal and review of these plans is not in the best interest of the public. SECTION 16. Subitem g, Item 40, Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 17. Paragraph A, Section 3.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding a new item 3 as follows: 3. Replat one or more lots fronting on an existing street if: a. The owners of all those lots join in the application for amending the plat; b. The amendment does not attempt to remove recorded covenants or restrictions; c. The amendment does not increase the number of lots; and d. The amendment does not create or require the creation of a new street or make necessary the extension of municipal facilities. SECTION 18. Paragraph B, Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Prior to City approval of a plat revision involving four (4) or more lots, a revised Preliminary Plat may be required by the City. In addition,a final drainage study may be required at the discretion of the Dircctor of Public Works City Engineer. • 1. The City Manager or his designated representative may L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 6 of 15 Swaive the requirement for a revised Preliminary Plat when the Plat Revision is without significant change of street location, and without substantial effect on City services, drainage or adjacent properties. 2. A revised Preliminary Plat may include all the area within the limits of the original Preliminary Plat except those areas which have unexpired Final Plat approval from the City unless this requirement is specifically waived by the City. SECTION 19. Paragraph C, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Easement Abandonment: The following procedures are to be used for the abandonment of easements in the City. The Department of Public Works shall maintain the forms and procedures for the abandonment of easements. (see Appendix)In both cases outlined below it will be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain original signatures from the utility company representatives on the mylar to be filed at the county prior to the City obtaining the signatures of approval from the City representative. A processing fee entitled "Easement Abandonment" shall be • set by Council in the Schedule of Fees. This fee shall be paid upon submittal of the application and shall not be refunded under any circumstances. SECTION 20. Item 1, Paragraph C, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: During platting: If the property is being platted then the required abandonment statement and signature block should be shown on the face of the Plat Revision. The easement to be abandoned shall be shown in faint lines on the plat and clearly marked "to be abandoned with this plat." SECTION 21. Paragraph F, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Public Landscape Easements: A public landscape easement typically ten feet(10') in width may be dedicated adjacent to public ROW for S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938, and all streets designated as arterial or collector level thoroughfares as shown on the approved Master Thoroughfare Plan. This easement shall typically be used to facilitate coordinated tree and/or landscape plantings along the City's thoroughfares or for the purpose of planting replacement trees due to necessary removal of established trees for road expansion or other public improvements within existing • ROW. This is not a required easement and cannot be required by the City as a part L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 7 of 15 -7 C-? • of a Developer's Agreement or by any other means. It is intended that the Public Landscape Easement shall overlap any required bufferyard and further that provisions of a Public Landscape Easement shall have no bearing on the planting requirements of the bufferyard. SECTION 22. Items 1 and 2, Paragraph A, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows: A. Authority for Approval: 1. City Staff: The City Manager, upon receiving a recommendation for approval from the appropriate City Staff, the City Engineer, and City Attorney, is hereby granted authority to approve all single-lot Plat Showings, and Amended Plats as defined herein. An applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision of the City Manager, may request that the plat be referred to the Commission for decision. The decision of the Commission is final. 2. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and recommend • approval or disapproval on all Preliminary Plats, Plat Revisions, and multiple-lot Plat Showings for final approval by Council. The Commission shall have final approval on all Final Plats. SECTION 23. Item 2, Paragraph D, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: The stipulations of the Plat Review are hereby made conditions of plat approval unless specifically amended by the City Council, or by the Planning and Zoning Commission in those cases where their approval is final. SECTION 24. Item 1,Paragraph E, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Construction Plans/Specs.: Construction plans, specifications and related documents shall not be required as a prerequisite to the approval and filing of a Plat. However, some portion of the construction documents may have to be prepared by the Applicant and submitted for review and approval prior to filing of the Plat should the Plat be potentially impacted by a construction related issue. • Approval of construction plans will be a prerequisite to the initiation of any L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 8 of 15 • construction. Plan preparation, submittal and review are outlined in related ordinances of the City. Fees for administrative review of construction plans shall be established by City Council. SECTION 25. Item 1, Paragraph H, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Original Signatures on Mylar: All plats intended to be filed by the City in the County Plat Records must be signed and notarized as described in the "Procedure for Recording of Plats" available from the City (see Appendix). There are different procedures for Tarrant and Denton Counties. A common requirement is that all revisions to the plat shall be made prior to running the black-line mylars which are to be signed by the owner,notary,surveyor,and City representatives. The mylars and prints required by the Counties shall not be accepted for filing by the City if there is any other original ink, other than signatures and seals, appearing on the plat. The City will then obtain signatures of the appropriate City representatives. SECTION 26. Paragraph A, Section 4.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: The Final Plat will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a • copy of this review given to the applicant. The Final Plat accompanied by the Plat Review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon approval by the Commission,the City will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 27. Paragraph B, Section 4.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Multiple-Lot Plat Showings: All multiple-lot Plat Showings will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. The Plat Showing accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for recommendation and the Council for final action. Upon approval by Council, the City will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary, and Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 28. Paragraph A, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Amended Plat.:All Amended Plats will be accepted for review,plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. It will be the applicant's • responsibility to revise the plat as needed to receive final approval from City Staff. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 9 of 15 • Upon approval, the City will obtain the signature of the Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. (As amended by Ord. No. 483-B) SECTION 29. Paragraph B, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is deleted in its entirety, and the remaining Paragraphs are renumbered accordingly: be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon approval by the Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 30. Paragraph A, Section 4.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: All Plat Revisions (Replats) will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. A public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission. City staff will provide notification as required for replats • under Chapter 212 of the Local Government Code. The Plat Revision accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for recommendation and then to City Council for final action. Upon approval by the Council, the City will obtain the signature of the Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 31. Paragraph A, Section 5.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: A. Street right-of-way dedications shall be as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan and, where not shown therein, shall be not less than the follow- ing: STREET TYPE ROW WIDTH State/County varies (100'-500') Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 124' Arterial - Five lane undivided (ASU) 88' Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 94' • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFr3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 10 of 15 SArterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 70 Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 84' Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 60' Local Street (non-residential) 60' Local Street (residential) 50' SECTION 32. Items 1 and 2, Paragraph F, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows: F. Horizontal Alignment: 1. Centerline Radius: The following centerline radii shall be the minimum allowed in the design of all street construction: STREET TYPE MINIMUM RADIUS Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 1400' • Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) 1000' Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 1000' Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 600' Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 500' Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 400' Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer 2. Common Tangents: Reverse Circular Curves having a common tangent shall be separated by a tangent section in accordance with the following table: STREET TYPE MINIMUM TANGENT BETWEEN CURVES Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 300' IIIArterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) 200' L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 11 of 15 -7c. -I i • Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 200' Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 100' Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 75' Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 50' Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer SECTION 33. Items 2 and 3, Paragraph G, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended as follows: 2. Maximum Grades: No streets shall be designed or constructed with grades in excess of the following: STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 4.0% Arterial - Five lane undivided & four lane 6.0% • divided (A5U & A4D) Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 8.0% Arterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 9.0% Collector- Two lane undivided (C2U) 10.0% Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer 3. Vertical Curve Lengths: In order to maintain adequate sight distance, the following minimum lengths of vertical curves shall be required: STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterial - Six lane divided (A6D) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) and 50 feet for each algebraic four lane divided (A4D) percent difference in grade Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 12 of 15 7C � 13 IIIIArterial - Three lane undivided (A3U) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Local Street(residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer SECTION 34. Paragraph C, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended as follows: Double fronted residential lots shall not be allowed. However, lots which are backed up to an arterial street shall be allowed when there is no access allowed from these lots to the arterial street. Access may also be limited to collector streets for lots which have double frontage. SECTION 35. Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance • shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 36. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 37. It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases,clauses,sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 13 of 15 7C- 13 • decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 38. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of • the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 39. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 40. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIISUBDIV\483_G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 14 of 15 -7C- ItF 0 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR SATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT"\SUBDIV\483 G\DRAFT3.WPD June 9, 1997(2:47pm) Page 15 of 15 City of Southlake,Texas -- - • MEMORANDUM June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Carpenter, Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 483-F - Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance - Park Dedication Section: SECOND READING Attached you will find a proposed ordinance revising the entirety of Section 7 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This draft reflects a combination of recommendations by both the Park Board (during their March meeting) and the Planning and Zoning Commission(during hearings on May 1 and May 8), language suggested by the City Attorney, and the motion made to approve during the first reading at City Council on May 27. Please note that the text depicting the approval of the first reading as stated in the motion by Councilmember Harris is in redline text, and any language it replaced is in strikcout tcxt. Any 0 modifications made by staff to clarify language subsequent to the first reading is in italic redline and italic strikeout text, and is subject to Council discussion, of course. Also attached are research graphics, as requested by the mayor, depicting alternative dedication amounts which would have been attributed to several existing subdivisions had they been submitted under this proposed park dedication ordinance. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call 481-5581, Ext. 866. CLC\cic cc: Debra Drayovitch, Fielding, Barrett and Taylor Kim Lenoir, Parks and Recreation Director Sherry Berman, Park Board Greg Last, Community Development Director • 7tt • 1 ORDINANCE NO. 483-F AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; REVISING THE ENTIRETY OF ARTICLE VII, PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for • the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to provide for adequate land for parks, recreation and open space, it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483, to authorize the appropriate park land dedication requirements, or facilities, or improvements, or fees in lieu of said dedication requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Article VII of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended in its entirety and replaced by the following text: • • 2 ARTICLE VII PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1 7.01 PURPOSE AND INTENT: The requirements for open space, park and recreational areas 2 contained in this section are intended to ensure that there will be sufficient land dedicated 3 or otherwise set aside to meet the demand and need of the future residents for open space and 4 parks. In determining the size, shape and quality of open space and parks areas that should 5 be set aside and reserved in the manner set out in this section, the City has considered the 6 projected growth in population and development within the municipality and the amount of 7 open space and park and recreational facilities needed to accommodate such growth as stated 8 in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. 9 10 7.02 APPLICABILITY: A. Unplatted Property: This section, as amended, applies to all property for which a 12 final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval, unless otherwise 13 noted herein. 14 B. Exempt Property: Any tract or lot occupied by an existing residential dwelling unit 15 at the time of adoption of this ordinance shall be exempt from the dedication 16 requirements of this section herein if the residential dwelling remains on the lot. This 17 exemption pertains only to the tract or lot with the existing residential dwelling. Any 18 additional lots created by further subdivision of the property shall be subject to the 19 requirements herein. 20 C. Date of Assessment: All requirements contained in this section shall be assessed at 21 the time of approval of the final plat of any applicable property. 22 23 • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF \PARK_DED\CC_2ND.WPD • 3 1 7.03 LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS: 2 A. General: Land dedication requirements herein are based on the City's adopted Land 3 Use Plan and the Parks Recreation& Open Space Master Plan. It is within the sole 4 discretion of the City to require a developer to provide the land dedication 5 requirements herein with the development plan, concept plan, preliminary plat, final 6 plat or other appropriate development submittal. 7 1. Residential Developments: Based on the population projected to reside in 8 the City of Southlake and the stated desire in the Parks,Recreation,and Open 9 Space Master Plan adopted by the City Council to provide 21 acres of park 10 land for every 1,000 residents in an ultimate condition,park land meeting the 11 requirements contained within this section shall be dedicated to the City at 12 a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every twenty-five (25) residential 13 dwelling units or prorated portion thereof • 2. Non-Residential Developments: Although non-residential development 15 does not generate residential occupancies per se,it does create environmental 16 impacts which may negatively affect the living environment of the 17 community. These impacts may be ameliorated or eliminated by providing 18 park or open space areas which buffer adjoining land uses, prevent undue 19 concentration of paved areas, allow for the reasonable dissipation of 20 automotive exhaust fumes, provide natural buffers to the spread of fire or 21 explosion, and provide separation of lighting, waste disposal, and noise by- 22 products of non-residential operations and activities from adjacent residential 23 areas. The City has therefore determined that non-residential developments 24 must provide dedicated parks and/or reserved open space at a ratio of one (1) 25 acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of 26 development or prorated portion thereof. 27 3. Off-site Dedications: A developer may dedicate the required park land for • a development at another location owned by the same developer within the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK_DED\CC_2ND.W PD • 4 1 City with the consent of the City, provided that the off-site land dedication 2 is in accordance with this section. 3 B. Transfers and Credits for Prior Dedications, Fees and Gifts: In considering the 4 amount of land dedication required of a proposed development, the City may, at its 5 discretion, apply former dedications which were in excess of the requirement at that 6 time to current or future dedication requirements of the same owner/applicant. A 7 dedication or cash payment in lieu of dedication made prior to the passage of this 8 Ordinance shall be controlled by the provisions of the ordinance in effect at the time 9 such obligation arose, provided the final plat has been submitted to the City for 10 approval prior to the passage of this Ordinance. At the discretion of the City, any 11 former gift of land to the municipality may be credited under the terms of the current 12 Ordinance toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of 13 such lands. • 15 7.04 CHARACTERISTICS OF PARKLAND: 16 A. General: The Park Board shall annually recommend to the City Council a summary 17 of the character of dedicated park land most desirable in meeting the objectives of the 18 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. These characteristics shall be 19 provided in an abbreviated written report to all elected and appointed officials, city 20 staff, and the development community, and shall be placed in Appendix 11 of this 21 ordinance. In determining whether to accept or refuse the dedication of park lands, 22 fees, facilities or a combination thereof as outlined in section 7.05 below, the Park 23 Board and City Council shall consider this written report as a guideline for such 24 decisions. 25 26 S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD o • 5 1 7.05 ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION: In any case where a dedication is required, 2 the City shall have the right to accept the dedication as submitted for approval, or in the 3 alternative, to refuse dedication of the same, and in lieu thereof to require payment of cash 4 under the formula contained in this Section or to allow the developer to construct recreation 5 or park improvements. The City may permit a combination of dedication, improvements and 6 fees to be used to fulfill this requirement. 7 A. Fee Payment Alternative: 8 1. Approval of Fee Payment Alternative: The City Council shall, upon 9 recommendation of the Park Board, determine the acceptability of a 10 developer's payment of fees in lieu of the land dedication requirement of this 11 section. 12 2. Calculation of Fees: The City Council shall annually establish an acreage 13 land value cost figure to be used in calculating park fees. This determination shall be based on a reasonable study and investigation performed annually, 15 and may be performed by an independent registered land appraisal firm as to 16 the average fair market value, as opposed to tax value, of acreage in the City. 17 This figure shall be the acreage cost under which all park fees are calculated 18 for the fiscal year. 19 a. Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: Park land dedication is required of 20 all residential developments. Upon determination that a hardship to 21 the dedication of park land exists, the City Council may consider a 22 variance or waiver to the land dedication requirements herein, 23 allowing the developer to acquire land of an equal value in other areas 24 designated by the City, or, in the alternative, allowing the developer 25 to pay the equivalent of the cost of land in their subdivision based on 26 27 the determined cost of one (1) acre of land divided by twenty-five(25),for a resulting fee per residential dwelling L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD • 6 1 unit. 2 b. Non-Residential Development Fees:The fee payment alternative for 3 non-residential development shall be calculated by dividing the 4 determined cost of one (1) acre of land by fifty (50), for a resulting 5 fee per non-residential acre cost, or prorated portion thereof. In the 6 event the non-residential development is less than fifty(50) acres,the 7 total acreage, net of perimeter right-of-way dedications, shall be 8 divided by 50 to determine the prorated fee payment. 9 3. Collection of Fees: No building permit shall be issued nor shall any 10 construction be allowed to begin until payment of any fees required by this 11 section has been made. 12 B. Physical or Equipment Improvements to Parks 13 1. Compatibility with Park Master Plan: A developer may have the option • of improving existing facilities within municipal parks or improving 15 dedicated park land in lieu of park land dedication or payment of cash,based 16 on recommendations made in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master 17 Plan. Should any of these options be exercised, the municipality and the 18 developer shall, prior to initiation of work on such improvements, enter into 19 an agreement for credit of expenses for authorized park improvements. In no 20 case shall the municipality be required to reimburse the developer if he 21 chooses to improve parklands at an amount greater than required. Such a 22 proposed agreement to provide facility improvements in lieu of dedication 23 shall be submitted in writing with the application for any required Concept 24 Plan or Site Plan. In the event that no Concept Plan or Site Plan is required, 25 the agreement shall be submitted with the application for the preliminary plat. 26 27 7.06 PRIVATE PARKS: If a developer desires to incorporate private park, recreation or open • space areas or amenities within his development, he may request limited credit for these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD 11 .77 • 7 1 facilities against his public open space dedication requirements. A developer may request 2 credit for any private park, recreation or open space area, but such private park, recreation 3 or open space amenities may never satisfy more than 25%50% of the total park and open 4 space dedication requirement. Semi-public park areas acceptable to the City may be given 5 credit toward required park dedication requirements not to exceed 50%of the total dedication 6 requirement. 7 8 7.07 APPROVAL PROCESS: 9 A. Land Dedications : 10 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Director of Parks and Recreation or 11 their designee shall may report to the Park Board regarding any park land 12 dedication issues arising from development applications submitted to the City 13 for approval.The Park Board may then make a formal recommendation to the • Planning and Zoning Commission to accept or refuse any proposed dedicated 15 park land prior to the Commission's action on the development. 16 2. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and 17 Zoning Commission shall consider the recommendation of the Park Board in 18 determining the acceptability of any land dedications proposed on any 19 development. The Commission recommendation shall then be forwarded to 20 the City Council for final approval where applicable. 21 3. Final Plat Dedications: Where review of development applications has 22 resulted in the City's desire for land dedication, such land dedication shall be 23 shown on a final plat and shall contain a clear fee simple dedication of that 24 land to the City. 25 B. Fee Payments in Lieu of Dedication and/or Facilities Improvements: 26 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Park Board shall make a formal 27 recommendation to the City Council as to the acceptability of any proposed alternatives to park land dedication. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD • 8 1 2. City Council Consideration: Upon receiving a formal recommendation 2 from the Park Board,the City Council shall enter into an agreement with the 3 developer for the provision of dedicated park land, fees in lieu of dedication, 4 facilities construction or improvement, or a combination thereof as outlined 5 below. 6 a. Developer's Agreements: Developer's Agreements between the City 7 and the developer shall include the following requirements as 8 applicable: 9 (1) Boundary Corners Established: Each corner of the park 10 land to be dedicated shall be permanently monumented with 11 3/4" iron pins set in concrete. These shall be located and 12 identified on a recordable plat or land survey completed by a 13 land surveyor registered in the State of Texas and provided to 411 the City by the Owner and/or Developer. 15 (2) Utility Extensions to Park: A minimum size of 6" water 16 main and sanitary sewer, where available, shall be extended 17 to the park, in location(s) specified by the Director of Public 18 Works. 19 (3) Short-term Maintenance: The Owner and/or Developer 20 agree that no construction materials shall be disposed of or 21 deposited within the park by its contractor, subcontractors, 22 employees or agents at any time while the subdivision is 23 being built. If materials are deposited or disposed of within 24 the park, the Owner and/or Developer shall be required to 25 remove these materials within 72 hours of written notice by 26 the City. Before the City accepts this land, the Developer 27 shall remove all trash and dead trees. 0 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD 7b- T • 9 1 7.08 USE OF FUNDS: 2 A. Fund Established: Funds received by the City pursuant to this Section will be 3 deposited in a special fund dedicated to the accumulation of monies required by this 4 section. 5 B. Permitted Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may be expended only for the 6 purchase, lease, or other acquisition of park and open space areas by the City of 7 Southlake, the improvement and site preparation of such areas and sites, the 8 extension of utilities to or within such sites, the installation of landscaping, play 9 equipment or recreation improvements on such sites, and/or attendant engineering 10 and planning costs associated with such park development. 11 C. Inappropriate Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may not be utilized for 12 any other general business activity of the City or for maintenance of park facilities. 13 D. Authorization for Use of Funds: All expenditures from this fund shall be made in • accordance with the City's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan and shall 15 be approved by the City Council after a formal recommendation of the Park Board. • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD 7D -rD S 10 1 These appendices are not considered a part of this ordinance and may be revised or updated as necessary by the City Staff. 2 3 APPENDIX 11 4 Guidelines for Park Land Dedication 5 (Approved by Park Board 5/12/97) 6 7 A. Land dedication or otherwise set aside for open space and park and recreational areas shall be of 8 such size, dimensions, topography and general character as is reasonably required for the type of 9 use necessary to meet the demand and need of future residents, e.g., open space, linear space, 10 trails, active recreation for team or individual sports, playground, etc. 11 12 B. Natural areas or flood plains which provide unique opportunities may be included in areas 13 dedicated or otherwise set aside or reserved for open space or linear greenbelts. In considering 14 any area for dedication which does not meet the standards of this ordinance and where the 15 ordinance allows the municipality to employ its discretion, the following may be considered: 16 17 1. Preserve area of unique natural beauty, area possessing unique natural features, or other 18 ecologically valuable areas. 19 20 2. Facilities may be developed in partial fulfillment of required parkland dedication. 2 3. Whether the area is proposed to be contiguous to an existing or proposed school site. 24 4. A combination of land dedication and fees paid in lieu of a portion of the land dedication. 25 26 5. Where developments are contiguous, two or more required dedications may be combined 27 to form a single, viable park area. 28 29 6. Acreage dedication which would expand existing parks or recreation facilities. 30 31 7. An applicant may transfer the required parkland in a subdivision to another location owned 32 by the same applicant within the City of Southlake with the consent of the City Council. S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD 'ib, il • f 11 2 SECTION 2 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or 3 refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance 4 shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a 5 violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 6 7 SECTION 3 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the 8 City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with 9 the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances 10 are hereby repealed. 11 12 SECTION 4 It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, 13 paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, 14 paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or 15 decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the 16 remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same 17 would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any 18 such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 19 0 SECTION 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place 22 for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and 23 if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation 24 of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the 25 official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by 26 Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 27 28 SECTION 6 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this 29 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative 30 provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without 31 further proof than the production thereof. 32 33 SECTION 7 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage 34 and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 35 36 37 38 39 4 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD • • 12 1 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 2 , 1997. 3 4 5 6 MAYOR 7 8 ATTEST: 9 10 11 CITY SECRETARY 12 13 14 15 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 16 , 1997. • 19 20 MAYOR 21 22 ATTEST: 23 24 25 CITY SECRETARY 26 27 28 29 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 30 31 32 City Attorney 33 34 Date: 35 36 ADOPTED: 37 • EFFECTIVE: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\CC 2ND.WPD 1\)'- �3 0 Park Land Dedication Graphic Exhibit The chart below and attached graphic mark-ups of selected plats are illustrations of what park land areas would be required under the proposed Ordinance 483-F, as compared to the currently adopted ordinance. The required dedication amounts are indicated as follows: land required under the current ordinance is solid black, and the additional land required by the proposed ordinance is shown in diagonal line hatching. Please be aware that these plats were copied from reductions, and their graphic scales may differ. Since the residential park land dedication is a function of number of dwelling units and not gross acreage (as is the non-residential requirement), it can be deduced that the greater the density (or number of dwelling units per acre), the greater the park land dedication requirement would be regardless of the gross acreage. The following chart and exhibit reveal this circumstance. Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 d.u. d.u. Timarron Village I 35 PUD 14.807 .70 1.40 • The Woods 8 SF-lA 17.082 .16 .32 Myers Meadow III 96 PUD 44.184 1.90 3.80 Harrell Place* 6 SF-1A/ 5.844 .12 .24 SF-30 Meadow Ridge 58 SF-20 37.416 1.15 2.30 * Not a plat, but a project which was mentioned by the Council as relevant to the discussion. S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK_DED\EX H IB IT.W PD • 7 • W ,,I, �-:. S 6720'2i E - 197.0E bm E. S 6426'21- E-197.9E 10621 17656 STREET a t�� 2 '7e.e,1oe.L� vat 4 !r q- 1' 1" oo' s, 1C 1215 v ,-wow. n t- 4' 15 04?5'54. E _ CV 1 1 123''3 i�i`�I O 1 123.0E, W` I,. B4..7.0fr.SIX.*.*.dar. '1- 100 30 0 100 76 8 �I ,0 iiMiir , - Z 10424 9 'ro„ f-'S - 6'UE. VI • , r SCALE IN FEET I I I..Ipp• - °1 lax a2 27 15 U s..,)1. 20,SAT n, 1. C. `S1iPJ5'n'Y�' i 53 1N t+�l.. ,i 1 101.37( . 229.68 S 6753'Sa' C ' \'`,v.c. rF `ty, ( 6.s.7o - - 170.50 11 r R Oo21'oe' E I J 12o.se n q ,i55 5•UL 110.64 1tn5)4 6( 25 25 J I -� \' '� 10 / ��' I--to'UE 1_ u.` 1 i 11 0 E 50 n or 0 :��\ E " 5� / = m 1J eie�� zai ��aa ,.,, ` I'k.o.w. 6s•ur w'-I • 1D�5�V v yg q'/ $ u )0909 �i •/QP.L1-5mJ g 10 IQ_z 115 / u (' Q 7 )M29 SrS< r�, BLOCK 152 ' STREET D' j = 8 I +� t 7 e I3110972.5.54... g ;,? 6'U.L ti s t.1 I n'.„fit : S 6435'64.E-111.1E E) , \ 16 ^� 78 I gg 63;;TT: 0y1-' l L. S°c.J /.r 1 >E 47•„5D \ ,00.L7 1~ to -, ,,S. `S.... 1 r / / w 8 t 1 I toolool ff 11 8 AA 8 Ir,oe9oo a 18 .d •ti .,S \7x� / o ,.NL a xl ! 12000 I S 6147.00 C +M1yt' 'S R ;Y` / r N "'8 ,5+u sr </4�se4)s's.'>y t47.00 g .e v��/ ,sees r lam. V �' L ""` °�7 y F �. ." +° S 64J5'St• E J 1 /,F,\2 j' . 2 r Sony W__54---eo.U9_`I' o /' ` F o I i 150.00 10,1 1-� 3 .-- /'b P V s 2 PROJECT � 4 } R� - ---=--- _13.c- -BLOCK 55 .' 12930 Sr /., 50.3 ,�` 6 t o yr LL)CATIO } COURT • - 8 9 •s 8 r.2 7. 1 6. s 3J•nr /: W 7;r\,+7r�„ -) u 2 PC6Li aw s --[--C ,L 51C E `" 1-i,6 8 3_ 7 1IIa 6 i" 'as.s,-.1.; �1.i 1,KT ,10.1 sr $ �/ t I 1 xQ 1Q weeisi 1..29vg 5 ;I.,' • r, ti(r 944 VI 1 •C a17 Ia. ev t 7000D - 2s•I n,`,.n2n v 75.aL�L---= 3„.s,...ei, CA `1,5111,st.` l 1' I w ' (4 • rzp.00 19 y.(.145.00 25'25 �.. „,_ ✓ 'v �S `i ^, S°-'- i I N e4)s'st•w-600l+n t9 Ce ' ...4 111 6500 76, 6-\ :� $ -24. 5`.se.a, as , stm a6.00 -TQl(w naa ai.' tt 7 200.E 0 610 LOCATION MAP �$ �.Y° . . .^ I a a �n (N.T.s) *9 's ' •"1 7 °A E ' k 1 5 . '3,--3 R 2 ` -""'z C.G. O '� „°'a „m,Y -0L�t` 3'L' 'r '6 11271 5r g-I10.4 sr-Li 1 Y„9,9 4 g'3'U.L �L7 • BLOCK 52 m00 z `�� • N 9945'0K' W -240.67 ?I 6T31'5C w - 477.97 10'U.L Ivni 3M-202.PC.25 P.O.B. A FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON ADDITION Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) VILLAGE 0 - WEST Om (IF" 711E Units O.YI. KNIGHT SURY(Y. AHSTRACT FIE. 899 @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 IN 711E CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IAFRANT COUNTY. TEXAS d.u. d.u. 14.807 ACRES / 35 LOTS OWMER/DE`.uoil.R; mitRi%Gti I./.':i. ,,,,,, ,,pATNJN Timarron Village I 35 PUD 14.807 .70 1.40 `0L' L QUIT:;41,,P 117LCV/4': IR\9N6. TEXAS 1T,C952.. - (i1.1) 791-T339 Lt BLOCK I CZ' WINDSOR FOREST 0 I • _1 ca~oCn W PHASE'I • E 11 •fUOI•100.••H BLOC II S VISTA TR IL COUNTRY ESTATES VOL.3B8.17O,•PG.74 !IIS L.388-204,PG.42 ....•. , .•n VOL.308-98, PG.16 BLOCI( IZOIO 9 a t IT 31J- C� CITY Of sILLLER --CITY Of SOUTNLANL�'IFLORENCE — ROAD------.-- L )!,eL«s•I .....f or:Itsl slut -^} -..__.—_ -- NB9•s2 oo•EIS--eo----- T I 0 SH ACNE/O[O.C•1!p!OR RIGMr-Or-•+•. --1.— Vi..M/.I I FOND SCRIP TIO! I/t' 1 r _ --_-__ __ -_ __ _ -- -_- __ J • ------200.00 188.00'-- ''2 187.50'- 1523.J2 2SS 12'- - - -230.15 M•Rw d. �- �17f,.D -- 184.50- I ...es 1 a.•I -- --- ..- ......-____ sili N89.34 24 E • r n7{ I 40� BUILDING LINE f Li- /2 420 'r+I1 r n f Q • N LGt 1 O N Oi O n' N W I O +1 1.500 AC. m � • F. ,. IQ.I Q m O W ` W Z 89'3424 E 279.68 Q 'u •'0 "' Lot 7 e Lot 8 0 - CwrT. MOOR( O o Lot 3 W Lot 4 Lot 5 n Lo b Cr) •O / •.p .o ,n A J n I,I v1.7130,r[.)la BLOCK 3 X ZI ?/ •.� 2.150 AC. -„, 2.024 AC. H 2.022 AC. :v 2.8OI IC, -N 2.000 AC. N 2.S00 AC. j�,O I N O o ARABIAN HORSE COUNTRY ADDITION W I '7/ N O — . „ „ N I N VOL.388-124,PG 27 0_ �/ r IA 0 �^ „ 3 I b vo.w MANr1A 1 I / Lot 2 A T •..Weil,M.{of Q 11 1.S00 AC. N O I Y' I 1 .O 1 I I` .__. ) 2� ,2 I s 283.15 20001 188.00 ••4.47 183.04 259.•iY IB4,SI 229.94 nr• ROKRT CARru C _ - -- ------.- 589.53.(0.: : :'T _ 856.5 —~- a_—_--_ç 4 ( SMc Vi vw f..[ i0uslun (sY 1 ,1121 vol naa, LOT I J J FRES NOUR NO.521 ADDITION y4• CAB.A, SLIDE 1825 i BLOf.)3 DITION /Z Xi I I M•ai• covet Aa(i NE-71- Vq. 388-93,PG.3 /��1... I I I vLassq ry.n)2 11 . 2) Ij III -- — 1• I • CUME+�RLAND TRAIL ' • IounuTr s /41 ( DRAINAGE[stir 1 I 641 urso.r..»s W IIIY ry • Y�„ THE WOODS Cl O •7 r . V. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN s~,jlu a TAR RANT COUNTY,TEXAS,BEING A TRACT IN THE '�°( . J.J.FRESHOUR SURVEY ABSTRACT NO.521 c 4 B LOTS 4 17.082 Ac. o so zoo k-1-.•f{,.----',--- I August 22, 1996 c.•ri.,C : . in 1r11 Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 d•u. d.u. The Woods 8 SF-1 A 17.082 .16 ,: .32 -fir -----,04-`— rut-. =j — r== n r= ,.a.o== FL- ,lam==-j=---ts b�-1-=,-o -.- ro3'—- - -1-- • . mPR1YAIf OPEN SPACE/5 gi �1, t oo / ,, '�• art/sr. r .. rI war r.r. 'Y d ram. 'BR Lw H'R l,.v,i.r p^ .,..so�.r. 7 tuav9.r p'R / 51 • Jail.r..r ,�' ® i;� , E'el.i 'Ts',1._1 'Js q v e `��_ ,�, ■y a` �J'o'_�—'RN. _ wm' j. ._.:,O+V __1-12r,P.-_ A - , 8' r ° BSI— REDWING— - �, DRIVE - —1 s Q HB? °"' ® imiT 1�81'-r" -1-Bm 1_ — I _6t6'�.z..'—I 1 /lrno xr. ^� tre,el 1 s t „` I I ynl 0 50 a 100 200 ,'��/�73 _ SCALE : 1' = 100' 11 . I w•Ic 7? ,o 2 MNS..r. ...RV .r.g, 1400 ff. aco.r. .:-ir. $,f . ,,t. I & plueoi.r� Im• Arm r.r, hst n.u —mnsesn,ar • i —w — j1 $ � n ~�i c.4.. ``41:451Eir. 1.RRt/,.0.' 1/4W 141.4'f.r.11 RB ,ONf.y '7 (86 B! x I-4, 'b'C"i .�.§: 49,.b` ; 51 t-271 53 '�^--KB.�Y 1:•_11 ,u+fv s r.'ti ', �'h� p Wort s.r. laa,t.r, � I � ta<.ttiur 35 LIv �' �. 4�' 8 63 ' +m 1L:_" ' o xni r.r. .y® rm,.r. i�_�0.4? •® y+_ vga�sl7. - ,my+rr �- um- w lyY S MEADOW P11A5E lil,tu.:i: ;--u"� -4 � � 1 (8 ' S� �$ /151n s.r. 9-1- �i ls,r s.r. 1 �, lwtt.r. IMMO REC'� JUN 2j {4.1 A r.;.I (� de: ./ — f�sd y V ut. LOTS .-� la ,a,s r. tAei 'fj _ iLSB9 73,34 F AJ7.41 y -`•1- - 96 I..1/1J 40 R 9YY__I A;aill \ _Q/, .411.1 v1 F m' o � • rr. cut. BJ.FOSTER SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.519 5 m3s.r. 5� • § s 5s s° gyp°r. �' IMAM..TIN I , ' 2 1.O s.r. 44 '" v y 87 't'•.'\ h4\ J mm. _ CITY OF SOUTIQ.AE$TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS -,- -- -n Q--- 9-V1 \\y lue t.r r� •�.�S ll.,01/w ---i R p I 1 .'�AP••• •• 7� tn' 57 •3 ,e t s.r. //e `ti :,c 32 �,�c. bm e �a fi / j1 e 1 IR id F V �� / ? ,tertrp A89 '23 F 7Q334• °•=-S 31 r / / 11 15 �$.4 I:.. u,.,Sr, 9Q r ,31P1t s.r. ��fdset,P-0 I �.A• -- -- --—IIT--=dSm�-13'yi.sr�m-=r��Sm==1—trim= 1 '`/ '/R�y Ea /ii ', 13 y.� ' 4I •I y _wommv / ,uoss.r. dµ41. .,,aos.r.> > Si .S t• ?5 e a .e n r� - i`\- • "1 f +� Ap/1: �' ,azo t.r. B 26 77 B 28 7 29 „..,.,1--- .,U / $ 17 4 �•�i 'fly.' k `CSC `� 1 ✓/ 1/1Dlfr. y ,>•I/r.r. »yl fl. pl- ImM ir.p Q rl.s.r.1 G' I O '`y ,�, "r. ''� b ,.n.12 s.r. \.' j t �'„' �. • ,sa s.r. " -"'I = iu1r-1.__sam" 11� esm' _I vas 11 °,$' J ' _ /�o s' su. ,.h13 ss.r. $1 1',�/ '' a+ y /� 'Q 01 \k,_ ®— — m�';F — POS g °" _i€T 1 't'� a,ry9.r. a Jam'a m `�1 !0 7. /\' .- /e Joni a 1,o s� /�$3�m'"1�;' h�7 LYJtb7✓�r� „1 f ;,m:�t.r. 0 e a ti o, 73 ,. z ,/ sm, • os ' �1 't 135.Cb 5 •- el. Y� w LO' ,lws.r.� n-,1. w' I?, ZI 9 y � 9 t y� • IB ,� ` 1•' r' E �& Z! x 7? lsons.r. a o�"'- a,�,fr, si•'�` 1pt.r. 15*` 8 R • Q Inv r.r, ZJ ,�,',sae t r. ss $ gr 1 �. ^ E1LOIX B� B 3 sut � N^ r�fs.•11, y�/�. B �a y , y �% � p J l L 1ml s.r. • ��`{ a/ o.'' ?? 5 ?1 ij� c't7 19 � ao_.S 4� ate' -_ •� J3,,p ,1� e o su.�3"`' / '\ /.1� 1a,.tr. tY"'� �.fi4 �,yFq,,S�t.r. ,.,,tr. Jae fr. ,sw t.r. $$��..l�j 4Y 71'- ^' �Qv, L@e?.— u � J' 7�(N• '�• \f` 4 y ; k r'am StJy V?JrE 44f W Z��.Q7 �_,Ao z^ '$8-� �5'� � `� S��'j5�� _e4j0'� ` .�y�,wl�s.r.9'• �{A ( (( u+ {.[[',"fig' 1\/ ‘ ._ ,i `' 'F.-1 r. ^� till ! - Y;^� 1 / -i"' -'2., 1 13 Fyn l' III �'{ t%y Ls ,., 11 �a Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land(acres) ��'•'""tr "may . Units ', ''=�^' 3j ( / @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./255 ' " "� d.u. .d.u. Myers Meadow III 96 I)UD 44.184 I.90 3.80 P95 Tnrs- I i I •; ,.0'um_m_[t..1. / - i V ."' I i. of / b ZONNG // _ t{' • , R I i' / / ' tIs la LOT 1•LLOCK 2 . / / / /R0o(w'E ETEDENTARY 5a4o \ \ I^, g'� 0 V.SIA IAAllS AOOOION VOL. • ]e.-95.IG.) ♦ / / / / // I ( I Ya.E5e11�•PG,501/ - I PR.T.C.f. / J I I I \ D.R.T.C.T. I .---' I L _- POINT OF j� .ter' — — — COMMENCING { —p ) • is s'sELL,D VOL.. 10957, C. 1767 D1 T.C.T y 7 ae�J 1 µ ---��111 ✓a. �9'. i E E'E 1Z81E ' 11CIMNARON TRJ • ..w / / •2s' 220.51 9].h' 9).17' 19]��-__I__19330' I� \ —I r LOCATION MAP PuOUC R-O-w � ,.,��.3 II �_ `�y�i�—� ______\___ -- '�- xDc.tn/E� — T _ a�D,•-`��lll' I y \. Y • .1LI•� ]2.45 Aryl. \ �' 8\ \ \ \ oco.c.T6 ` / / f— '+1_ I d� _ \ ` naoa m.r a91. 0.7.2«. '�8 f \ \ 1. 7'/ i . . i°( � 14 i0T. BLOCK 1 Y 1so..i�ce • . 10.0•�.c\ 8 \ Ij Stfi aeuuwoR! . 9°4--wl.»e-Iel.PS e F ,R• . ' . w . o.". I I a009 00 \ \ • ;va�., ti .�S�7 LL a PROP TY 01 / Y 11115.Po.117 4"P - 'AG F_ Z /• fV : Jo,' o: POINT F D i.t.T. O \ -. - - 1 0 17n. LTAi — _ / BEGINNING 'A�G�a'1�1/�tc,r1g S \•sFQ• �� 1p / .` 1 I I e100'Vil.[SMT. ZVI` -.. 1 I' �_� 19].1 71.1.7 :".•- y ��1? � 7e 17TL EaR. 1_,,,„., _ O1g700b�0 31fE i � 18�Y� 52�9.8 �` • —�o ' 1— Im 7 eo.la' 99.9T' i' ; i I I I J /� ZONNG ry e. 41...., v. Ira I.2PEARSON LANE�jip.f.C.T. 'I I 1 I I I I I I /r il / e ,1 .O7).1attK 1 I I 11701 I ..-, p__, I CYNNtRON ACRES N56 I 1. I I I I I _,I I I i '1' // / /a / 1 - vR.T.C.T.LOT 0 ol_308,111,PG 11 I I • G' ^ .wo.O.... on r IMAM' Ai PT LANE A11011K7M •`••�0 I I "I I i I g g / • g W.. .n r..r V.)ee-170.P.22/.R.T.C.T. I ICU / Y 'Tie+ 1 7 1.Ai tt b, � A .�,A. �: 5, �n ��o I� I ��o % ��a �o ��o I� I TZ :5D1t LAKE AOOTIION ZONNG I g ni J f V.]M-tra P.zz PAT.C.T. I LOT 2.RDCK, 1 j 4 I - 9 I/ I I l• y CY M"T ACRES I 1 S. ..7...T. RLOT a I 'AG' I I+f71R5d1 1ANE xKRT1DN V.1m-Ira P.22►.R.T.C.r. Zj 4-� .1• - - • —I I I I '-'~ ,OE ZONING - I LOT I.BLOCK I VK_\� CA/M.ARON ACRES .OT) LOT 1.B-1e1.PG.5 I 'AG' LOTPEA 3 LANE ADQiKW I 1 ZONING t V.)ee-17Q I.22/R.1.C.T. I I ( I ; \ I LVIW\V I — 11 1 . ..�- II I �, L_ j+ ]5.0.OMN.S VR ESYT. .-.� .-Jlr I + �.J.-�� I PONR-0 L-wANE _ CITY QF SOHW(UTE __ — - —p1Y OF KE.LE CONCEPT PLAN Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) LOTS ,bLOCK 1, Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 HARRELL PLACE d.u. d.u. BEING 5.8438 ACRES OF LAND IN THE J.G. ALLEN SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 18 CITY OF SOLVVLA0RAANT COUNTY. TEXAS Harrell Place* 6 SF-1 A/ 5.844 .12 .24 PREPARED FEBRUARY 20. 1997 SF-30 Le LandCon Inc. * Not a plat, but a project which was mentioned by the Council as relevant to the discussion. `. Englneefe•arveyore•Plamers 2501 Prttlw Dr.BA*612 Poi wort,Tor.AA 7002-5100 ►D.Boa IDO¢47,Fort Mort,Toms.70113-0247 (WI506-7066 PAR (WI 533-5067 Yl'11716 a aa•ae',l•l. 590.le r.r•arm.Mon 1 evs/' rte.PO* ,,.•rrm.R • f11.«' a1.II .ww tll.al _ In.of .. •'` o.�. to ` '� .. 1. • ''l �r' 1. `III •J• O I r'� (Q • 1 T msee S.F. _ 21.173 Si. I ,�9.' 21 M7 L/. � 20.221 LA r: \ 20.3N tJ. �.0. �J. / • f N'«'d•I , * ..N«•d•r M.....d•f I.Y.!7fi1• /N-yy o__I .Y. .:•tom • �a� 11 n L1 k I r — ' Ir ADl. v�,.t .r,.oO t 'o; D i. .. R r DDI I/'IDl. _ 1 1 N.►70 V. 20.006 V. I xt.{GO sr. mat L/. p 1 p f •N'.l•t [II•«'d'I M*earl' —rwcw--- ^ —rw+ R 4r.)I Iw.00' I y. I 44,00 I �y R. i`l UOl f , VW'Mr M•N'11• .I , �� {{{yyy {R.,•~.1 IR ca x0.002 V. 6 O V , 1().10 * ® N 2,002 V. 5 p1 ti ! 20.002 LI. •• r 30.001 Lf. _ i e I C 9 , I OW.' V I wN'd•f_ . a 84 M w•u'd•[ IK 07 : - 9 IN.00 i2i I°^ Y !M•N'II'( I ISO.•• �I I Iw.00 R 'mar to y {�. Q 1 b s l ! Ir Dal. �©u 4 • u mGo2 v. d ? ■ moot u. .4 4 g M , . k,k d m,uox Lr. 1 M w•«•d•( f^ 43,1►5 Ll. a v. e x►.6►7 LI, R-w•«'e.g• I IK00' p 'ft. 0V' 2p, L i 'o{I 7� ^\� I 11 /. I. I TI'1D / '..w1 q R.2. 4 11 i �1.w•N•II•r 1 \Ir®t ill tz " 4 ' IK OD'1OJ. . © I 6, O zo.®V. 1# ,/ l 1 r.Xo+m J \ r I K II' 20,002 V. 1 •. I� 24001 SF. m.002 LI. '• © 1110.00 MM•ff•d•f /K00' Iw.OV' `'D) M� . Iw.N• II DDl. 20.m►V. IK 0d I $ {• I yi' pprry� 1 2b•xu/rafh © k Z 1' ® $ taoot Lr. ;1 p sa.D(fo:•0l. U l �21� i m.0.1]Si. 1 g m.00x S.F. III x4A0 LI. I m• 11 1 _ aII `� •'1 '� Dal. Iw.00' I. ® 2a' rJIlD I1G LIK • • ii M Dr« I�( «.of w.oa II r711 42,464 Lt. M$ i RS7 I7RIm I p•.r d'i"VI.N ' tie.u' Ri t.oo ttk ff r_____....., rl.If' , '1 1rD.0000• 1p.' 6 r /Ix.(I' K N IL Oo' R I D x4x37L►. 20 aJ.I N.Oc;1T1 ; 1 : 1• 1l D.O.t61/ � flm.001 Lr. 1.• . I Ili I- • li. �w DDJ. 20,002i/. $ mAot Lr. 2o,oa2 L►. m.00t sr. LOT 21,1642 10.Ft I. I'_ t•.a•u'd'► t M IN«•d•( ..AL'.l- ` �"l+•,\v r1 �� t' O Iw.00 [ I«.00 \'Tartar-- \it DDI. 31 , or row 0...or•••oc- • It It • ,Dr IDl. - ^ - 246x2 LI. W DDl. IL Ilk pYi N, 2 Lr 20.111 aJ. 20D11u. 714 �Cjj�ryp�`4.. yIw d' pDDJ. 1 N.T.S. • W. I. g .la D►e L Ir ADJ. 6 i 1 p DDI. ' 4 m g1Q V l •a { u'ODl. ; '. "i IS l xaw V. II \ 'j,. ►5. I© ' V II I< 30.310 L/. •I� IY •l. 20.110 SF. E ' sr RAJ.D...• qP II.ODl 21pe0 S.F. Ia• b a/ �1s r-- Tw.3r— �i.ZT— 171787 Y : �ic" if..rrm-Im $ $D•IS'tl'W /310.44' vs-SR 451 Project Dwelling Zoning Acres Required Park Land (acres) iIFINAL PLAT SHOWING Units @ 1 ac./50 @ 1 ac./25 LOTS 1 THRU 25, BLOCK 1, d.u. d.u. AND LOTS 1 THRU 35, BLOCK 2, MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES Meadow Ridge 58 SF-20 37.416 1.15 2.30 Lolly VI JVUU IIaF\c, IcAaJ -A STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-132 PROJECT: Second Reading / Ordinance No. 480-222 Rezoning & Concept Plan Timarron Commercial, Tract III STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner 1, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Concept Plan on property described as approximately 200.822 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481,being Tracts 1, 1A1, 1 E, 2,2A, 2B, 2B 1 A,and 2C 1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being Tracts 2A, 2B, 2B 1, 3, 3 A, 3 C, 5, 5 C, and 5 D. LOCATION: North of State Highway No. 1 14, east of North Carroll Ave., south of East Highland St., and west of North Kimball Ave. OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial • District REQUESTED ZONING: (ORIGINAL REQUEST): "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1 " Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "I-I "Light Industrial District, "I2" Heavy Industrial District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 20.08 acres)from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-IA" Single Family District, "SF-30" Single Family District, and "MF-2" Multiple Family Residential District. AMENDED REQUEST: Same as above, but deleting "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "I-I" Light Industrial District,and"I-2" Heavy Industrial District and amending the residential zoning category to exclude MF-2 and adding "SF-20" Single Family Residential (see attached letter). • • LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use(may include residential, office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial(Same as in CS,0-1, 0-2, B-1, HC, MF-1, and MF-2 districts) NO. NOTICES SENT: Forty-one (41) RESPONSES: (ORIGINAL REQUEST) Ten (10) written responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Michael A. Quinn, P.O. Box 92575, Southlake, opposed. • John T. Knight, 650 Cherry Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, undecided. "This being such a broad request, I am not sure how it will affect the value of my property or the quality of life in my neighborhood." • Steven E. and Katherine J. Cook 1981 E Highland, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. See attached letter received Oct. 8, 1996, addressing protecting residential areas in Southlake, • residential property values, increased traffic, resident protection, and keeping East Highland residential. • Robert P. Steele, 959 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Hazel J Miller, 5213 McQuade St., Fort Worth, Texas 76117, in favor. • Jerry and Jacky Lawrence, 1901 E Highland, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. See attached letter dated Oct. 10, 1996, addressing noise, water and air pollution, traffic on Highland, and problems associated with a possible sports stadium on Highway II 4. • D/FW-Carroll Road Ltd, etal, PO Box 700876, San Antonio, Texas 78270-0876, in favor. "It's been a long, long wait for Southlake region investors!" • Maria P. Cameron, 1776 E Highland St., Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. See attached letter dated Oct. 11, 1996, addressing the right-of-way on Highland Street and Carroll ISD. • Martin Rester, 600 Cherry Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "I do not want to give permission for unlimited zoning next to a residential area." • • Harold Knight, 1 749 E. Highland St, Southlake, in favor. "I am in favor of the request 'with the attached changes.' With a these changes, I support their request." (Please note that Mr. • Knight has included a marked-up copy of a Zoning District Summary sheet immediately following his hand-written letter.) Three (3) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • James and Cecile Gardner, 1213 Ashmoore Ct., Southlake, opposed. " ... we want to present to you, our desire for this tract to maintain it's current zoning until, which time, Timarron is prepared to come to the city with a legitimate and specific Development Plan." See attached letter. • David Edelen, 1203 Ashmore Ct., Southlake, opposed. "With the broad range of categories and the limitless number of"permitted uses"under the categories,and with also a possibility of a land sale to a third party with no partnering with Timarron,the residents have no protection under the PUD that a satisfactory development will take place." See attached letter. • Margaret C. Burnette, 1002 Quail Run Road, Southlake, in favor. "Quality commercial development with well landscaped open space is what Southlake should strive 410 for." See attached letter. Two(2)identical responses were received at Planning and Zoning work session on December 12, 1996. ". . . the application as it presently stands is unacceptable to us in many respects, and it must be modified to make it more compatible with residential living in order to obtain our acquiescence." See attached letter. • Debbie and Roy Gutherie, 2412 Emerald Circle, Southlake. • Don and Janet Rose, 1209 Ashmore Court, Southlake. See letter for additional comments. RESPONSES: (AMENDED REQUEST) Nine(9)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade St., Fort Worth, Texas 76117, undecided. • Michael A. Quinn, P.O. Box 92575, Southlake, opposed. • Ann Hardin, 1991 E. Highland St., Southlake, opposed. • Robert Steele, 959 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, in favor. • Marie Eubanks, 1371 E. Highland St., Southlake, opposed. "The property is too close to my house where we live. Too • much noise. I would object to the traffic on Highland." F -3 • Harold Knight, 1 749 E. Highland St, Southlake, opposed. • "Because it includes manufacturing, repair, services, taverns, clubs,and used merchandise sales and other uses that I do not want located next to my property; however I would be in favor of the request if it was modified to eliminate those uses that I have marked through on the attached Summary of Zoning District Symbol and Permitted Uses." See attached list. • Steven E. and Katherine J. Cook 1981 E Highland, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. Residents states CS, 0-1, and 0-2 uses that they would like omitted. See attached letter. • Boyd and Susan Herndon, 1201 Ashmore Court, Southlake, opposed. Residents state concerns with safety on E. Highland Street,building heights and setbacks. See attached letter. • Dale Crane, 3625 N. Hall St., Suite 620, Dallas, Texas. Dale Crane and Debbie Gutherie on behalf of E. Highland, Sunshine Lane, and Stanhope residents, offers suggestions regarding the enlargement of parcel A, increasing setbacks in parcel A to 300',and eliminating all manufacturing uses. See attached letter. • Seven responses were received(7) p cei ed outside the 200' notification area: • Dan and Carla Hemyari, 550 Cherry Lane, P.O. Box 92605, Southlake,opposed. Resident states concerns with property values, traffic, uses in section C, drainage, and an increase in crime. See attached letter. • B. Dennis King, 205 Manor Place, Southlake, opposed. Resident states that, ". . . PUD's were never intended to be a substitute for good land use planning." Resident also states that ". . . Westwood should speak specifically to its plans for the property . . ." See attached letter. • Gerald Hodges, 1210 Ashmore Court, Southlake, opposed. One petition was received from Grapevine residents with sixteen (16) signatures, all opposed. See attached copy of petition. Gerald and Karen Hodges, 1210 Ashmore Court, Southlake, opposed. Resident asks that they be advised on the following issues: street access and egress,the DFW Airport noise cone and height restrictions, the comprehensive Park and Greenspace Plan, as well as the • tree ordinance. See attached letter. • Chris White, 1216 Whispering Lane, Southlake, opposed. • "No "blanket" zoning without specific purchase or user, entrance on Carroll /Highland." no • Christopher McGuire, 2089 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, opposed. Resident states concerns with the "timing" of meetings and notification of impending meetings. See attached letter. • Letter received from North Carroll Avenue Homeoirners. Letter states concerns with safety, diminished quality of life, loss of property values,negative environmental impact, waste water disposal, groundwater runoff, and flash floods. See attached letter. • Michael Howe, 2612 Parker Court, Southlake, opposed. Resident states concerns with safety and traffic. See attached letter. Two(2) identical responses were received. Letter states concerns with quality of life, location, image, flood control, drainage, police and fire protection. See attached letter. • Gary S. Krall, 204 Sheffield Court, Southlake, Texas. • Paul Hendricks, 200 Sheffield Court, Southlake, Texas. • P & Z ACTION: October 17, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7,1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. November 7, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the January 9, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. January 9, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to continue public hearing until the January 16, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. January 16, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to table until the January 23, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue public hearing. January 23, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to continue public hearing until the January 30, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. January 30, 1997; Approved (5-0) to table until the February 6. • 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and to continue public hearing. i� -5 February 6, 1997; Approved (6-0-1) to continue public hearing S until the February 13, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. February 13, 1997; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996, with the following amendments: • no impervious coverage in the flood plain with the exception of trails; • 50' bufferyard on the north property line of Tract IIID: • 4:1 slope from Timarron's property line versus the residential property line; • any "HC" Hotel District uses in Tract IIIC will be located at least 400' from the north property line; • Applicant will comply with the Landscape Ordinance,and for every story from two (2)to four(4), they will add 1% of the lot area to the required landscaped area, and for every story from five(5)to six(6), they will add 2%of the lot area to the required landscaped area; • "CS" Community Service uses will be added to "B-1" Business Service Park and "O-1" Office uses in the additional notes for "crash-gate" access to Tract IIIA; III • the following "C-2" Local Retail Commercial uses would be permitted by Specific Use Permit only: duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset printing; • "C-3" General Commercial uses would be limited to 20% of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB; • "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial uses would be limited to 50% of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB and in Tract IIIC COUNCIL ACTION: June 3, 1997; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 30, 1997 and subject to the submittal dated June 3, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) create a 300' setback along the north boundary of Tract IIIA (along E. Highland)and the northern portion of Tract IIID for any use other than residential; 2) extend the 300' cross-hatched area to the northwest for the balance of Tract IIIC to exclude any "0-2" or "HC" use unless approved by City Council at the Site Plan stage. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review III Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996 and oncept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 30, 1997, with exception v of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review 1111 Summary No. 3 dated June 13, 1997. Please find the attached submittal dated June 9, 1997. The pages numbered "DR" will be incorporated into the final ordinance. L:\W P-FI LES\MEMO\96CASES\96-132ZC.W PD S S r c -1 • October 11, 1996 , • Mr. Greg Last Community Development Director City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Zoning Applications Timarron Commercial Tracts 1, 2, & 3 Dear Mr. Last Timarron Land Corporation respectfully requests amendments to the above-referenced zoning applications as follows: "Tract No. I (Proposed zoning-SP-2 Generalized Site Plan Development) • Remove C-4 - Arterial Mall Commercial District (Sec. 23) from the list of proposed zoning categories • Tract Nos. 2 & 3 (Proposed zoning-Non-Residential P.U.D.) • Remove the following from the proposed zoning categories. • C-4 - Arterial Mall Commercial District(Sec. 23) • I-I - Light Industrial District(Sec. 26) • 1-2 -Heavy Industrial District (Sec. 27) • Amend the residential zoning category to exclude MF-2 and, if possible, add zoning classification SF-20 Additionally, we have enclosed a letter from Carter & Burgess, Inc. regarding the Traffic Impact Analysis requirements. If there is any additional information required, please call. Since yours, ORA S v Yetts, .E. Development Director Enclosure SEY/kd • Lastltr REC'D O C T 11 1996 The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, .67 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO: • �1 - I am (in favor o (Vpd to) undecided about) the request for the following g reasons: REC'DOCT 081996 SIGNATURE:„AT)- �7iz COOK, STEVEN E ETUX KATHERINE (Please Print Name),527-1' + C"�C�L� C� � 1981 EAST HIGHLAND 4.-7")e%- •`) e --J . / v SOUTHLAKE TX ?60920 ADDRESS: 73 f/. o00 f- � � e�17 /Cti n /1 I - C-422- i Cry C�c-� Z -C• `,� The Lawrence Family • 1901 E. Highland Southlake, TX 76092 10 Oct 1996 481-6101 Joe Wright Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake Dear Mr. Wright, We are writing this in regards to the upcoming re-zoning request for Timarron Commercial Tract 3. We understand the developer has requested to make this 200 acre tract a Planned Unit Development tract (PUD). Among the uses permitted under this PUD zoning are many commercial and industrial activities including auto and truck sales, bus stations, commercial warehouses, road machinery sales, clothing manufacturing, machine shops, public utility franchise, welding equipment and supplies, printing plant, steel fabrication plants, and tank manufacturing to name just a few. It is also our understanding that this type of zoning will also allow sports stadiums and hotels up to 6 stories. Now, we realize that this land, being adjacent to Highway 114 and under the runway 13R flight path at DFW requires, and should be used for, "high quality" commercial development. However, we don't believe in giving any developer a "blank check" in • determing the commercial uses. It is obvious that if granted this PUD as outlined in the package dated September 23, 1996, about the only thing they can't build is a toxic waste dump. Specifically we request the following modifications: 1. Heavy industrial and commercial means large truck deliveries, noise, water and air pollution and unsightly premises. Southlake has never allowed this and we don't believe the intent is to let this occur. We recommend carefully screening their laundry list of uses and to further limit them to light, high quality commercial, retail and very limited industrial uses. Specifically, prohibit 12 (heavy industrial) zoning, and put tighter restrictions on any B2 (Commercail Manufacturing district) and I1 (light industrial) zoning. 2. Any hotels or structures over the 45' limit should be limited to locations adjacent to highway 114 and not be near Highland street (the northern half of tract le) which is a residential street and a primary school bus thoroughfare. We also propose eliminating the planned roadway through Tract 3 that connects with Highland. This could significantly increase traffic congestion especially during school start/stop times at the Carroll/Highland intersection which would occur during business rush hours. We strongly support the Planning and Zoning Commission's current position of permanently downgrading the status of Highland to a two lane road, maintaining its status as a low volume residential and school road. 410 RECD (Ju1111996 f '1C_1D 3. We know a Sports stadium is not specifically in this zoning request, however PUD • zoning would not preclude this from occurring. This type of structure would lead to the influx of thousands of vehicles and people on a regular basis (large numbers would be required just to make it profitable) and further strain our traffic congestion on and off highway 114. It would also bring with it all the asscociated problems inherent in large numbers of people congregating at sports events (parties,alcohol abuse, noise, unsupervised groups of kids). We recommend specific language prohibiting any kind of stadium or arena. Half a dozen local high school football games (24 total hours of usage) a year do not justify this type of development. Other school sports such as track, baseball and soccer don't generate the crowds that would require a new stadium. In conclusion, We would recommend that any resident or member of this commission who sees no problems associated with this proposed PUD, take a drive down highway 183 through Bedford towards Fort Worth and view the concrete jungle of high density commercial development and ask yourselves if this is your vision for Southlake. Sincerely, Jerry, Jacky, Meagan, Katy and / Robby Lawrence • • 1 E-11 • 1776 East Highland Street Southlake, TX 76092 October 11, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commision Community Development Department Southlake City Hall 667 N Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Sirs: I am writing in response to the proposed land use changes under Timarron Commercial - Tract III. The proposal is largely acceptable; I have only a few difficulties with it as currently written. First is the suggested 70 foot right of way on Highland Street. This seems inappropriate for the street adjoining two Carroll ISD buildings and very near a third building. In fact, to widen Highland to more than two lanes would compromise both the saftey and quiet of the Intermediate School. When Southlake taxpayers and the Carroll ISD are already challenged to accomodate our rapid growth, it seems foolish to render a functional • building unusable. This brings me to my second objection. I would like to see the proposed occupancies modified to be more sensitive to the nearby schools. I would hate to see a hotel and the accompanying drugs and prostitution introduced into the neighborhood; I'd rather have apartments. I am also concerned about those uses that might present an environmental contamination risk, such as plastics manufacturing or pest control services. These might be better located near the airport in the industrial area. I appreciate the commissions desire to retain the essentially rural character of our communmity while providing services and diversifying our tax base. But, the main reason people to move to Southlake is our schools. Please continue to give our childeren and schools the highest priority in your decision making. Sincerely, Maria P. Cameron • REC'D O C T 11 1996 . .. • \ \i .• ' 1111 -c‘_.\ \ .:•! .. ::... .., 1100,-%-\,,••••-M.i''t,, • °CY? ,i1Y?k::•;.':''''' .. . \\, ,6042.,...-.z..;, :::-. .•,- . ,,,,,,,- ,..,....:,...k.f.„:-,,..-,...:;.--.- -.....lis...,..„:.,:i::::.:•:::::.:.;:,.:.,..,..:,..,,,,. ..:•.•.. o ,..e,- ....,..•-•.•.:_-.... ,-,..• -c?.v, ..,..4.6...:!...:, 4- ..04,::, -...- . :- -?-fe- ' • - /6 -3'6•-?.(., 2P q 6..._ - I L / II/4 fee 1-) -,. :i.,i,-.e• .,.::::,,,,,..;:,.. , - •,,-: ,. • , 6 / is /yly .. . \.,. .4-f''.,. e,/P co 7'/ c'" 0 ri) 1,-- f/a G / - - •--r - Cit14 1061 f;'r / j (1 ; 1 0/1" IA .//1. 7? •4o3' 7-, dook404040110114#10.00***Ilik , c . . /4 f HAROLD I. I?Kr 1749 E. HIS:—:.__:..-•:-; c. . . SOLIT'r!—f]..1:2, .:. ,::' .:,i;i.'' ''::: zi:i:::..,i.; : .,:-:•.:,:,::::i::::;:•:.:..: RECD OCT 2 ,... 0 96-1 b 1 Summary Zoning District Symbols and Permitted Uses • Commun i Service District: public and private kindergartens, elementary,secondary schools, universities and colleges; museums; libraries; golf courses; parks; playgrounds; community centers; country clubs; public safety facilities; utility buildings; churches; city halls. AG Agricultural District: farms; ranches; orchards; truck gardens; plant nurseries; single- family detached dwellings (on at least one acre) housing of the owner or operator of agricultural use; supplemental single-family detached dwellings for full-time employees. RE Single Family Residential Estate District: horticultural activities; agricultural uses for on-premises consumption; single-family detached dwellings(on at least one acre) housing the owner or operator of the agricultural use (entire tract of land at least five acres); parks; recreational spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city halls; fire and police stations. SF-lA Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single family detached dwellings; minimum floor area of main residence 2,000 square feet; parks; recreation spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city halls; fire and police stations. (Lot area minimum 43,560 square feet) 0113 Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-IA; minimum floor area of main residence 1,500 square feet. SF-30 Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single- family detached dwellings; parks; lot area 30,000 square feet. SF-20A Single Family Residential District: same uses permitted in SF-30; lot area 20,000 square feet; minimum floor area of main residence 1,800 square feet. SF-20B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-20A;minimum floor area of main residence 1,500 square feet. • MF-1 Two Farnil_y_Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single family detached two family dwellings; parks; recreational spaces; city halls; police and fire stations. MF-2 multiple famil re (apartments, condominium , ational spaces; city halls; ire stations. 40WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD ry 0-1 Office District: accounting and tax preparation; adjustment and collection services; advertising agencies; architecture; banking; billpaying services; business corporate headquarters; business holding and investment services; chamber of commerce; • chiropractors; computer services; consumer and mercantile credit reporting; contractor offices; dentists; duplication and mailing services; employment services; engineering; finance; interior design; land surveying; law; management consultants; optometrist; physicians; podiatrists; psychiatrists; psychologists; radio recording and television broadcasting; real estate and insurance; savings and loans; securities and commodity brokers; stenographic services; title companies; travel bureaus or services; utility offices; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories. 0-2 Office District; all uses permitted in 0-1; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District: architects; bakeries; barber and beauty shops; cleaners; laundries; gasoline filling stations; grocery stores; meat markets; newsstands; bookstores; restaurants; tailor; city halls; fire and police stations. C-2 Local Retail Commercial District: any use permitted in 0-1 and C-1; antique shops; bakeries; bicycle sales and repair shops; blueprinting or photostating; book or stationary store; vocational schools; December 31; cigar or tobacco stores; cleaning and laundries; confectionery stores; custom dress making; dancing schools; day nurseries; delicatessens; ; drug stores; dry goods and notion stores; duplicating services; filling stations; financial institutions; florist or gift shops; • - -€eod-lockers; grocery stores; meat markets; health service facilities;jewelry stores; • leather shops; optical goods; photography shops; radio and television sales and servicing; restaurants; shoe repair; sporting goods; tailors; automotive accessory sales; variety stores; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories. C-3 General Commercial District: any use permitted in C-2; auditoriums; theaters and • cinemas; coin and stamp shops; commercial amusement centers; commercial art galleries; golf courses; department stores; dry goods and notion stores; electrical and gas appliances and supply sales; hardware stores; hat shops; health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums; hobby shops; furniture stores; lodges; sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities; mortuaries; funeral homes; music shops; plant nurseries; pet shops; piano stores; plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation servirPS; printing jobs; retail stores; skating rinks; taverns; clubs; toy stores; upholstery shops; variety stores; maximum height of 3 stories and 35 feet. C1• Arterial Mall Commercial District: any use permitted in C-3; indoor and outdoor shopping malls; commercial traditional mall land; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. G:\wPF\LIsTs\zoNDIST.WPD B-1 Business Service Park District: any use permitted in 0-1; administrative, executive, and editorial offices; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; book and stationary shops; computer 44 p44-f-Ac-44-ir-a--and research; dry goods; electronic • uiauuf ctur and research; funeral homes; printing and publishing; ; m.aufacturing of s; medical :I clinics; nursery yards; g; schools; professional and business schools; retail activity; security guard quarters; assembly; fine arts training studios; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. B-2 CommeL ial Manufact1rink District: used merchandise retail establishment; automobile or motorcycle sales or rentals; storage sales; builder supply; bus station; restaurant fixture supplies; produce markets; rent feed sto'eb; matey sales and city halls; police & fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. Light Industrial_District: any use permitted in 0-1; aluminum product fabrication; armature winding; wholesale bakery; blacksmithing or horseshoeing • : oom m facturing; cabinet or carpentry shop; candlemaking; candy • • t; carpet cleanin•, clothing manufacturing; cold storage warehouse; c• • ercial school; compoundin: - cosmetics and toiletries; creamery and dairy - oduct processing; egg 1 storage, candling, ing, and grading; electronic co • •onents manufacturing and assembly; feed stores; g blowing; ice cream g; ice manufacturing and bulk ice storage; insulation applic- '•n; irrigati•• ales and service; janitorial services; laboratories; linen and towel sery achine shop; mattress manufacturing or renovation; manufacturing of .: •teal • dental equipment; mini-warehouses; monument manufacture; o.-- ental-iron wo • pest control businesses; plastic fabrication; plumbing •-acing, refrigeration; or air c•-•itioning shop; public utility facilities; pump •+es and service; roofing contractor; s. - - d door manufacture; sheet met. shop; sign manufacturing; spray painting ••; store fixture manu Luring and sales; warehouses; welding equipment and supp '- • city halls; •• and police stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 •$ and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories an. feet; minimum lot size of 5 acres. G:\WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD • i kHeavy Industrial District: all uses permitted in I-I; agricultural implement and tracto 4111 sales and service; automobile and motorcycle sales, rental, service; bottl'.: • ants; bric , • ottery, or terra-cotta making; building material stora:=; . terminal and maintenance ••.; contractors plan or stora:- • . as; corrugated metal manufacturing; cotton s • :e. electroplatin: • . hies; feed grinding and processing; flour mills; food products manu a•m-.•.i :; grain elevator and storage; lumber yards; machine shops;milling, •.,.• e home sales, . •ufacturing,storage; household goods moving; oil w- •uipment sales; service, storage; a . • aceutical manufacturing; po .a - •uilding manufacturing and sales; printing plant or n- • •. •er; tile roofing manufacturing; trailer or camper manufacturing; trailer or truck sa • , a ck or railway freight terminal; truck stops; warehousing; welding shops. HC Hotel District: hotels and motels; public parks and playgrounds; private golf course; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. I iM ed Housing: manufactured housing; mobile horn • prefabricated housing; ci s ions; maximum height of 2 1/2 eet. PUD ?Ia.nned Unit Development District: residential and non-residential uses permitted; residential PUD district must be at least 50 acres; non-residential PUD district must be at least 10 acres. 0 1 Site Plan District Regulations (Detailed): to develop different sized and shaped land areas; multiple land uses; to establish compatible land uses; no minimum land area. S-P-2 Site Plan District Regulations (Generalizedl: to permit flexibility of area regulations while restricting usages; minimum of two acres. .'PE1LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD • JAMES AND CECILE GARDNER 1213 Ashmoore Ct. Southlake,TEXAS 76092 • METRO(817)329-0629 REC'D O C T 311996 October 30, 1996 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Commissioners, We are writing to you to express our extreme concerns with regard to the proposed zoning change to the Timarron Commercial - Tract III. As residents of Southlake and specifically Highland Estates, we want to present to you, our desires for this tract to maintain it's current zoning until, which time, Timarron is prepared to come to the city with a legitimate and specific Development Plan. We have heard from Timarron, that the city has "a narrow window of time" to take advantage of potential user interests in the available land along the 114 corridor through Southlake. They want us to believe that if we don't give them the zoning change they are requesting now, we all stand to loose a great deal, due to future declining opportunity to attract quality users. Timarron representatives have stated that Southlake has a perceived • reputation with potential users of exercising difficult and lengthy zoning and development negotiations. Timarron feels this makes it much more difficult to attract users without the requested zoning change. We, however, feel this is a great reputation to have and we are proud of our Planning and Zoning Commission and City Staff and Counsel for building this reputation. This reputation has and will continue to have, a long term, positive affect on the quality of life for all of us who live in Southlake. If you, the Committee, make the unfortunate decision to grant Timarron's request for the zoning changes to the three commercial tracts, we as neighbors to these tracts, must insist that the zoning categories B2, Il, and I2 be prohibited. These categories are absolutely unacceptable uses of these properties and will decrease our property values and potentially impact the safety of our children. We must also insist that at no time, now or in the future, shall any vehicle access be permitted, in any capacity, to East Highland from Tract III or any other adjacent properties. We place our trust in you, the Committee, to assist in the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of all Southlake residents. Sincerely, ,g,k,„. 0 ,`' James a`nd Ceci e Gardner 9E• le _i 1203 Ashmore Ct. Southlake, TX 76092 October 30, 1996 • City of Southlake REC'D OCT 311996 Planning and Zoning Commission Southlake, TX 76092 Dear P&Z Members, I would like to voice my concerns regarding Timarron Land Corporation's request for rezoning of the Timarron Commercial property, Tract III (200.822 acres). This request is for a Non-Resdidential Planned Unit Development (P.U.D) - "Mixed Use Business Park" submitted September 23, 1996. I realize that this property will be developed and am not against this. However, I want to be able to have a voice in what the development is since I live directly across East Highland in the Highland Estates Subdivision. I am concerned with the "Concept Plan" that is being requested. According to Section 30 of the city of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordenance, Paragraph 30.2 states "The PUD District will allow the development of any combination of uses which are permitted in that district." At the Timarron meeting Tuesday night, October 29th, Steve Jett stated "what will be built is not known, but will be in our vision". I see "Timarron's vision" is what is the most profitable for the Timarron Corporation, not what is in the best interest of the residents. • With the broad range of categories and the limitless number of"permitted uses" under the categories, and with also a possibility of a land sale to a third party with no partnering with Timarron, the residents have no protection under the PUD "Concept Plan" that a satisfactory development will take place. We will lose any control of what "permitted uses" can be developed once the "concept" zoning has been approved as submitted. If Timarron could provide us with a more detailed plan such as the alternative process procedure by submitting a "Development Plan" as stated in Section 30.8 it would be much easier to go along with and give my approval to the rezoning request. A Development Plan would provide as much detail as possible including a scale drawing showing any proposed streets and alleys; utility and garbage easements; street changes; elevations drawings that show the relationship of the buildings to adjacent property; preliminary drainage plans'; screening and landscaping plans in relation to adjacent property; ie.... I strongly urge you as a member of the P&Z Commission to require more detailed plans and limit the scope of the zoning request rather than approving the Concept Plan as is. Sincerely, • David Edelen tr7U - 191 • S 1002 Quail Rain Road Southlake, TX 76092 November 7 , 1996 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission Southlake , TX 76092 Dear P&Z Members , I am very much against the request for BROAD , LOOSE , rezoning of the three tracks of land north of 114 in the vicinities of Carroll Road , White Chapel and Dove Road , as requested by Mobil/Timarron . M/T should be required to present a detailed development plan for the property and not be granted the broad loose zoning they are requesting . 1111 The development of the 530 acres in question will have a major impact on future development and property values in Southlake . The city of Southlake and its residents stand to loosea great deal by moving too quickly and giving in to M/T broad , loose zoning demands . I trust that you , the Committee , will not bow to the pressure of big business and will require Mobil/Timarron to present a detailed development plan . In so doing Southlake will continue to be the city we are proud of. Sincerely , -2-72 cL, 7 c_-.. -c- -1„, -- Margaret C . Burnette Property owner , resident 1111 (EC'DNOV 071996 • TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT III The undersigned, residing in the vicinity of Tract III, feel that certain modifications to the application are imperative if this development is to be at all compatible with residential living and the health., safety and welfare of area citizens. It is respectfully requested that in deliberating this case, you consider the following things which will soften the impact of the development on those of us in the immediate vicinity. General considerations 1. Require at least two rows of single family lots (R-20A) along E. Highland, which are accessed only from Highland. 2. Allow no traffic connection between SH 114 and E. Highland, as a stipulation of zoning approvaL 3. Allow no relaxation of height limitations. 4. Avoid "night-time" activities on the northerly-most 1/3 of the tract. 5. Allow no sports stadia or arenas and allow no elevated tennis courts etc. 6. On the northern 1/2 of the tract, on areas other than R-20A, seek corporate • HQ's/campus structures with heavy landscaping, berming etc. Specific considerations In the following districts take the action indicated: 1. C-S d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds. ) g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power substations....water/sewer treatment plants) 2. 0-1;0-2: and C-1 Disallow any use within 400 feet of E. Highland 3. C-2 #6. Disallow (Blueprinting or photostating) #11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry ) #17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....) #20. Disallow (Duplicating service, printing, lithography ) #24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...) #36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...) Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland • REC'D NOV 0 4 1996 7`-2) -i • 4. C-3 #2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas) #3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...) #7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...) #10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...) #17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...) #18. Disallow (Mortuaries...) #21. Disallow (Pet shops) #23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating appliances...) #24. Disallow (Printing, lithographing...) #27. Disallow (Taverns, clubs...) Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland 5. B-1 #3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...) #10. Disallow (Funeral homes) #11. Disallow (Lithograph, engraving, printing...) #9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity #14. Disallow (Medical clinics) #15. Disallow (Nursery yards....) • Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland / 6. B-2- Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...) 7. HC Disa " w all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, but provide that none may be loc to within 400 feet of E. Highland and any within 1,200 feet of Highland shall o uz aced tc; -. s` :- ar e--+ /). ,31 1/ Tho9 11-- iz - ,4. iti- • TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT III Residents from the area around Tract III met on December 7, 1996, to explore formulating a consensus of opinion with regard to allowable development on this tract. Approximately two dozen were in attendance with another dozen represented by proxy. We understand that the applicant in this case is in the process of modifying the application to exclude certain uses and to provide limitations on height ana to r ^vide for buffering, landscaping etc. Nonetheless, the application as it presently stands is unacceptable to us in many respects, and it must be modified to make it more compatible with residential living in order to obtain our acquiescence. Generally, our principal concerns fall into several categories: 1. Traffic on Highland; 2. Uses adjacent to Highland and adjacent to residences on the south side of Highland; 3. Visual impact of the entire tract, but primarily the portions on Highland and adjacent to the residences on the south side of Highland; and • 4. Drainage. We suggest that these issues be addressed as follows: A. The north 1/2 of the tract should be limited to low rise, campus-style corporate HQ's-type uses with heavy screening and landscaping, open space buffer zones and severe limitations on nighttime activities; B. There should be a buffer zone of 300 feet-depth along Highland within which there can be no use at all, including no parking, no roadway or access of any kind, and no structures. Similarly, there shall be no use, roadway, parking or otherwise allowed on the portion of Tract III within 300 feet of the following parcels identified on the applicant's Existing Adjacent Land Owners Map as #5, #8, #11, #13, #14, and #16. C. There should be no structure on any portion of Tract III which exceeds 2 1/2 stories in height. D. No sports facilities should be allowed on the tract. E. There shall be no traffic connection between SH 114 and Highland. AND No f}Cc zs 7�a �,l:P�i/3,�,L efr2,3" A1/1* ' pri n ore-7 viz 1.47 Nca7. SL 3 O G j Saco..-ram -�. •�l �o Grra/f .lr. F Jfl_- n123 \ SF. The City, the applicant and the ultimate developer of the tract shall guarantee that development of Tract III shall not result in increased drainage run-off Ji swd— ,Specific considerations In the following districts take the action indicated: 1. C-S d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds. ) g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power substations_...water/se•w.r treatment plants) 2. 0-1;0-2 ✓Allow no municipal facilities 3. C-1 Allow no municipal facilities All uses must orient to SH 114 4. C-2 S #11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry ) #17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....) . #24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...) #36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...) 5. C-3 #2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas) #3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...) #7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...) #10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...) #17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...) #21. Disallow (Pet shops) #23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating applianc •) #27. Disallow (Taverns, clubs...) 5. B-1 Allow no municipal facility #3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...) #10. Disallow (Funeral homes) • #9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity #14. Disallow (Medical clinics) #15. Disallow (Nursery yards....) 6. B-2 Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail uses which arc reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...) 7. HC Disallow all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, which must be limited to the southerly 1/2 of the tract. �b✓2 Name JA-o p �o o`� �� Address TRACT3B.WPS • • The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, • 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. -FERENCENO.:: ZA96-132 (renotificationl RE JAN 0 61997 I am (infraarvf) (opposed to) the request for the following reasons: Because it includes manufacturing, repair services, taverns, clubs, and used merchandise,sales and other uses that I do not want located next to my property; however I would be in favor of the request if it was modified to eliminate those uses that I have marked through on the attached Summary of Zoning District Symbols a d Permitted Uses. _ • SIGNATURE: ` ' (Please Print Name) fh1 //1 . t / Pd ffr ,-, ADDRESS: - _ - KG HT,HARO I 1749NIE HIGHLAN LDD ST SOUTHLAKE TX 760924709 ________l O . • • . . . . . . • , , • . III �C\ \ E9E '4)1 . i► Summary 'Fr Zoning District Symbols and Permitted Uses 1 Community Service District: public and private kindergartens,elementary,secodary schools, universities and colleges; museums; libraries; golf courses; parks; playgrounds; community centers; country clubs; public safety facilities; utility buildings; churches; city halls. AG Agricultural District: farms; ranches; orchards; truck gardens; plant nurseries; single- family detached dwellings (on at least one acre) housing of the owner or operator of agricultural use; supplemental single-family detached dwellings for full-time employees. -- RE Single Family Residential Estate District: horticultural activities; agricultural uses for on-premises consumption; single-family detached dwellings (on at least one-acre) housing the owner or operator of the agricultural use(entire tract of land at least five acres); parks; recreational spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city halls; fire and police stations. SF-lA Single Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single family detached dwellings; minimum floor area of main residence 2,000 square feet; parks; recreation spaces; private boat docks; swimming pools; game courts; city halls; fire and police stations. (Lot area minimum 43,560 square feet) 4111B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-1A; minimum floor area of main residence 1,500 square feet. SF-30 Single Fam*v Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption;single- family detached dwellings; parks; lot area 30,000 square feet. SF-20A Single Family Residential District: same uses permitted in SF-30; lot area 20,000 square feet; minimum floor area of main residence 1,800 square feet. SF-20B Single Family Residential District: all uses permitted in SF-20A;minimum floor area of main residence 1,500 square feet. • \MF:1 „ Family Residential District: agricultural uses for home consumption; single family detached two family we in ; al s aces; city halls; police and fire stations. F-2 Residential ' t: multiple family res' (apartments, condominium , eational spaces; city halls; ire stations. \WPF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD ' 1 Pt- Office District: accounting and tax preparation; adjustment and collection services; advertising agencies; architecture; banking; bilipaying services; business corporate headquarters; business holding and investment services; chamber of commerce; chiropractors; computer services; consumer and mercantile credit reporting; contractor offices; dentists; duplication and mailing services; employment services; engineering; finance; interior design; land surveying; law; management consultants; optometrist; physicians; podiatrists; psychiatrists; psychologists; radio recording and television broadcasting; real estate and insurance; savings and loans; securities and commodity brokers; stenographic services; title companies; travel bureaus or services; utility offices; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories. 0-2 Office District; all uses permitted in 0-1; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District: architects; bakeries; barber and beauty shops; cleaners; laundries; gasoline filling stations; grocery stores; meat markets; newsstands; bookstores; restaurants; tailor; city halls; fire and police stations. ij C-2 Local Retail Commercial District: any use permitted in 0-1 and C-1; antique shops; bakeries; bicycle sales and repair shops; blueprinting or photostating; book or stationary store; vocational schools; Christmas treeles- room on wee " e fere Thanksgiving through December 31; cigar or tobacco stores; cleaning and laundries; confectionery stores; custom dress making; dancing schools; day nurseries; delicatessens; ; drug stores; dry goods and notion stores; • S duplicating services; filling stations; financial institutions; florist or gift shops;frozen food lockers; grocery stores; meat markets; health service facilities;jewelry stores; • leather shops; optical goods; photography shops; radio and television sales and servicing; restaurants; shoe repair; sporting goods; tailors; automotive accessory sales; variety stores; maximum height of 2 1/2 stories. C-3 General Commercial District: any use permitted in C-2; auditoriums; theaters and cinemas; coin and stamp shops; commercial amusement centers; commercial art galleries; golf courses; department stores; dry goods and notion stores; electrical and gas appliances and supply sales; hardware stores; hat shops; health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums; hobby shops; furniture stores; lodges; sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities; mortuaries; funeral homes; music shops; plant nurseries; pet shops; piano stores; plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation st rvires printing jobs; retail stores; skating rinks; taverns; olubs; toy stores; upholstery shops; variety stores; maximum height of 3 stories and 35 feet. C- I Commercial District: any use permitted i • • tstrtmor shopping malls. c d- maximum height of 6 stories and eet. 11)F\LISTs\zoNDIST WPD • Y off Heavy Industrial District: all uses permitted in I-1; agricultural implement and tracto i sales and service; automobile and motorcycle sales, rental, service; boar.: . ants; brie , • pottery, or terra-cotta making; building material stora:•; .us terminal and maintenance ..; contractors plan or stora e • • us; corrugated metal manufacturing; cotton s . i_e• electroplatin: • • sties; feed grinding and processing; flour mills; food products manu an:--. g; grain elevator and storage; lumber yards; machine shops;milling, is.•• e home sales, ufacturing,storage;household goods moving; oil w- .uipment sales; service, storage; aceutical manufacturing; porta. - .uilding manufacturing and sales; printing plant or n a er; tile roofing manufacturing; trailer or camper manufacturing; trailer or truck sa ; ck or railway freight terminal; truck stops; warehousing; welding shops. HC Hotel District: hotels and motels; public parks and playgrounds;private golf course; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height of 6 stories and 90 feet. = -. Ivfli actured Housing: manufactured housing; mobile home • prefabricated housing; ci s tons; maximum height of 2 1/2 D eet. PUD Planned Unit Development District: residential and non-residential uses permitted; residential PUD district must be at least 50 acres; non-residential PUD district must be at least 10 acres. 01 Site Plan District Regulations (Detailed): to develop different sized and shaped land areas; multiple land uses; to establish compatible land uses; no minimum land area. l S-P-2 Site Plan District Regulations (Generalizedl: to permit flexibility of area regulations j while restricting usages; minimum of two acres. j • 410TF\LISTS\ZONDIST.WPD C 7 a9 I. Business Service Park District: any use permitted in 0-1; administrative, executive, i and editorial offices; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; ; banks; barber and beauty shops; book and j rill goods; electronic I! stationary shops; computer �,�n,,f�rr,}ra and research; dry �e and research; funeral homes; printing and publishing; u `e•of t; s; medical g; schools; clinics; nursery yards; professional and business schools; retail activity; ' • etr ment manufactitr.in}g; security guard quarters; S ncr a^C� assembly; fine arts training studios; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. B_2 Commercial Manufacturing District: {t • automobile or motorcycle sales or rentals; , repair; RV storage/sales; builder supply; bus station; restaurant fixture snnpj k s; J ar 1il . • d 1� produce markets; rental equipme ; . , �._.,:., rA ,,.,hnlcrary �, P ice ctore Fivture Gales faciliti s; truck calr-< <- , �• wholesale houses; city halls; police & fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. �.,ight Industrial District: any use permitted in 0-1; aluminum product fabrication; • armature winding; wholesale bakery; blacksmithing or horseshoeing ; - oom m•.• facturing; cabinet or carpentry shop; candlemaking; candy . • t; carpet cleanin•. clothing manufacturing; cold storage warehouse; co•-, ercial school; compoundin: . cosmetics and toiletries; creamery and dairy e oduct processing; egg storage, candling, . ing, and grading; electronic co . .onents manufacturing and assembly; feed stores; g blowing; ice cream .. g; ice manufacturing and bulk ice storage; insulation applic. :•n; irrigati.• ales and service; janitorial services; laboratories; linen and towel sery -• _ achine shop; mattress manufacturing or renovation; manufacturing of •,•teal ..•s dental equipment; mini-warehouses; monument manufacture; o••• ental-iron wo • pest control businesses; plastic fabrication; plumbing •-ating, refrigeration; or air c.•.itioning shop; public utility facilities; pump .•es and service; roofing contractor; s. • . d door manufacture; sheet met. shop; sign manufacturing; spray painting •••; store fixture \ ( manu . turing and sales; warehouses; welding equipment and supp ': - city halls; and police stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 •! and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories an. feet; minimum lot size of 5 acres. OPRLISTS\ZONDIST.WPD '1r - '. I rm maybe filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, i e following fo R�a r oe;fii 667 Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. _ /�D !1 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 6-13 z__J 2 renotificati n / �� reasons: f) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following I am (in favor o pp � �o � l� �- �!�� l�� U� n S — No �.�/,'G sa-� bur / /I * SIGNATURE: I (Please Print Name) T ,o�n c r Ms Y4 : ADDRESS: I —� COOK,STEVEN E ETUX KATHERINE 1981 EAST HIGHLAND 760920000 SOUTHLAKE TX b I TO D O 40 (A3e-,-r--c (19 ir• 71-7"et 1'1--C/I')I--S.S if 0 ci ) ) c i e-----C �' Se_ — 0 Pa.) ; d 0 /-% 71- 0 A it a A__,-.1c_a,_.0- --)--6 ,) e_r- 1\ D b D-- . ,._f a_1/ j r) ,Se.r--.71-; 0 r-) Z---) 6— b r >1- A e__r r. Se_c--+it o f- Op -S-f-or ; e_s) /' c 0c�c �r ak. ) h 0 i� C. �� ^ D r off. -/-`i er, n Scc� *-- ,_)‘ 00 � So �-`�1. ,._ . ck-e2 0-\---- uk . s . Lo 6.,i-er Ok,t3) REC'D J A N 0 n 1997 C 7 LE`3/ . (. • B. Dennis King 205 Manor Place Southlake,Texas 76092 Home-817/424-3094 Work-817/871-8605 TO: Members of The Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake(Fax 817/488-9370) FROM: I Dennis King DATE: i January 23, 1997 RE: Timarron Rezoning AZ96 130. 131. 132 Please be advised that I am opposed to the rezoning Timarron is requesting for the referenced tracts. I attended the first meeting the Timarron representatives held with various SPIN groups and was unimpressed with the presentation. It became obvious very early in the meeting that Timarron had not performed any land planning but simply wanted a zoning designation which would permit the greatest flexibility for them. I believe it would be grievously unfair for the City of Southlake and its residents to approve the zoning requests in their present condition. Please remember, PUD's were never intended to be a substitute for good land use planning. 0 It should also be pointed out that Mobil Oil is no longer the owner of Timarron. The new owner is Westwood, which is a real estate company comprised mainly of executives formerly with Morgan Stanley, a Wall Street investment banker. The new owner, Westwood, should speak specifically to its plans for the property-not what it thinks or hopes will happen in the future. It is my understanding that Westwood is a "horizontal" developer and not a "vertical" developer. Accordingly, in all likelihood, Westwood will develop the infrastructure (streets and utilities) and then sell off the tracts as users come along. Each sale, if good planning does not happen now,could be a setback for Southlake's commitment to quality development and good commercial neighbors. With each sale by Westwood the residents of Southlake could very easily find their quality of life moving further along a downward spiral until that quality of life is only a distant memory. Thank you for your attention to this matter. G:UtPC1l,EGAU WORD\H01:195Q0%BDK9597DOC � _,O� 3 (` 2 N 3 \gg7 • TO: Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Zoning Case 96-132, TRACT HI The undersigned, residing in the vicinity of Tract III, feel that certain modifications to the application are imperative if this development is to be at all compatible with residential living and the health, safety and welfare of area citizens. It is respectfully requested that in deliberating this case, you consider the following things which will soften the impact of the development on those of us in the immediate vicinity. General considerations 1. Require at least two rows of single family lots (R-20A) along E. Highland, which are accessed only from Highland. 2. Allow no traffic connection between SH 114 and E. Highland, as a stipulation of zoning approvaL 3. Allow no relaxation of height limitations. 4. Avoid "night-time" activities on the northerly-most 1/3 of the tract. 5. Allow no sports stadia or arenas and allow no elevated tennis courts etc. 6. On the northern 1/2 of the tract, on areas other than R-20A, seek corporate • HQ's/campus structures with heavy landscaping, berming etc. Specific considerations In the following districts take the action indicated: 1. C-S d. Disallow all uses (Golf courses;parks, playgrounds ) g.Disallow all uses (Utility buildings and structures: power substations....water/sewer treatment plants) 2. 0-1;0-2: and C-1 Disallow any use within 400 feet of E. Highland 3. C-2 #6. Disallow (Blueprinting or photostating) #11. Disallow (Cleaning, dying, pressing works; laundry ) #17. Disallow (Dog and cat hospitaL....) #20. Disallow (Duplicating service, printing, lithography ) #24. Disallow (Frozen food lockers...) #36. Disallow (Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales...) • Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland rie-33 �, • 4. C-3 #2. Disallow (Auditoria, theaters and cinemas) #3. Disallow (Cleaning, dying and pressing works...) #7. Disallow (Conventional golf courses...) #10. Disallow (Electrical and gas appliances and supply...) #17. Disallow (Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes...) #18. Disallow (Mortuaries...) #21. Disallow (Pet shops) #23. Disallow (Plumbing and heating appliances...) #24. Disallow (Printing, lithographing...) #27. Disallow (Taverns, Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland 5. B-1 #3. Disallow (Apparel and millinery manufacturing...) #10. Disallow (Funeral homes) #11. Disallow (Lithograph, engraving, printing...) #9,#12, #13, #16, #21 and #23. Disallow any manufacturing activity #14. Disallow (Medical clinics) S #15. Disallow (Nursery yards....) Disallow any remaining use within 400 feet of E. Highland 6. B-2 Disallow all uses except #18.(Retail activity of a service nature...) and #19 (Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure...) 7. HC Disallow all uses except for a. Hotels and motels, but provide that none may be located within 400 feet of E. Highland and any within 1,200 feet of Highland shall be limited to 4 stories or 60 feet in height. /17711-1--eze :1 1 1Wxe C -- ./71?--/f. 111 / , x,7 2_ v1E-3(1c. Ashmore Court r , •1210 Southlake, Tx 76092 19 January, 1997 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: This letter will present recommendations for the REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TIMARRON COMMERCIAL. As about Tract III,ZA 96-p32me of the concepts aply to all three tracts, I which is nearest to speak in general terms then in part our home in Highland Estates. Our understanding is that if you grant rezoning on a tract, the city has no more control of street access and egress. Please advise us on this matter. First, Southlake should prohibit vehicle access from Timarron Commercial Tracts I, II, and III on Whites Chapel, Carroll, and Highland. These are neighborhood arteries fronted by residences, churches, and schools. The additional traffic from construction restaurants or offices should be restricted todelivery trucks, from vehicles rning Staten and out from commercial, Highway No. 114. Some limited traffic flow may be allowed on Dove and • Kimball. Our understanding is that the Noise Cone for air traffic landing or taking off from Runway 13R / 31L extends directly over Tract II and Tract III. Clarify the restrictions agreed upon between the City of Southlake and DFW Airport in regards to the Noise Cone and building heights. Please advise us on this matter. Second, Southlake should allow residential development in all three tracts where consistent with the agreement between Southlake and DFW. Thus, if the Timarron Commercial Tracts front on residential areas or existing homes, each tract should develop the perimeter areas with comparable housing: 1 acre lots or estates contiguous with one acre lots or estates, 1/2 acre lots across from existing 1/2 acre lots. Our understanding is that Southlake is developing a comprehensive Park and Greenspace Plan as well as a tree ordinance to preserve established timber. Please clarify these plans as relevant to Tracts I, II, and III. Since each tract includes flood plain, these plans for park, recreation, and trails should mold our decisions on the Timarron tracts. Please advise us on these matters. Third, Timarron has proposed a 300' setback on certain roads. This setback should be restricted to greenspace--no pavement for parking, no pole mounted • RECD JAN 2 21997 1E-35 parking area lighting, no structures permitted in the setback. Walking, jogging, or • equestrian paths may be included. Beyond the 300' setback, the berms and wall structures begin. Since the rezoning process is in full swing, I encourage the commissioners to protect the rural, educational, and residential environment which have structured the distinctive nature of Southlake. You, our Commissioners and later our City Council must squelch the speculative desires of Timarron Commercial when they negatively impact the quality of life we presently experience. Since ly yours, z f-Y A4c,_________ Gerald W. Hodges Karen A. Hodges 817-481-5932 khodges@flash.net S • r3& Christopher McGuire • (81 7) 329-4430, (214) 258-6999 2089 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 January 16, 1997 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis, I am very concerned about the way our Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) is handling the proposed Timarron Land Corporation requests for Zoning Changes. As you know, many of us are opposed to the request. I will detail my specific reasons for opposition in a forthcoming letter to you and the other principles • involved. My concern today is that the P&Z has scheduled what may be their final meeting on the matter for a date that is not on the usual first or third Thursday of the month. Also, coincidentally there is an important meeting at Solana tonight which will undoubtedly capture the attention most of us who follow city policies. I have spoken with a few of my neighbors and members of the press who were not aware of tonight's P&Z meeting. The P&Z meeting scheduled for tonight is not listed on the scroll of announcements displayed on Channel 25. Curtis, I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Surely, every legal step has been taken to notify interested citizens. However, the timing of the P&Z meeting tonight suggests an attempt to diminish the size of the crowd at the time of voting on Timerron's request. Before taking this critical step in the process, which I believe will have an enormous impact on our entire community, I request that the final vote be set at a later date and time. • REC'D J A N 16 1997 i Page 2 41) Individual citizens and loosely organized neighborhood groups cannot keep pace with a highly trained, full time staff of professional • developers and real-estate speculators. More of us, not fewer, need •x to attend the meetings that affect our neighborhoods and our property. What Timerron proposes will create the opportunity for a mish-mash of building and development. There is nothing in their proposal that is a plan. If granted, the zoning requests Timerron seeks will greatly increase the resale value of the land they purchased on speculation. To my knowledge Timerron has no specific intention to build anything. Even if they do, we are not sure what kind of company Timerron is now that it has changed ownership. Of course, they will assure everyone of their good intentions. But, their primary purpose is to do what is best for their owners and stockholders. I am not opposed to new development, nor am I opposed to legitimate businesses trying to make a profit in any legal enterprise. However, I want our city planning to be closely overseen by public officials who can be held accountable rather than trusting the • character of our city to random market forces as is possible with the proposed zoning. We have an opportunity to preserve much of what brought many of us to Southlake while remaining in control of well planned and needed development. Or, we can become another city like any you see along the local major thoroughfares. I will appreciate your thoughtful consideration of my request. Sincerely, (\A Christopher McGuire (cc: Planning & Zoning Commission members, City Council and Mayor, neighbors, others) -561 r . Michael Howe • 2612 Parker Court Southlake, Tx. 76092 817-329-4207 Mr. Joe Wright Planning & Zoning City of Southlake December 10th, 1996 Dear Mr. Wright: I am a pilot for American Airlines and I have to work this Thursday when you are scheduled to discuss the proposed zoning change on Carroll Road at the intersection of Primrose. I wish I could attend to personally let you know my strong feelings that the use of that land for anything other than residential development is a grave mistake. First of all, Carroll road is surrounded by many of our schools. To subject our children to the possible dangers of commercial traffic, and the mix of non-residents and young school children, is an unnecessary risk that would be an invitation for disaster in • todays world. Secondly, for those of us that live off of Carroll Road, it was obvious that the whole feeling of the road, is to get off of the businesses of Rt. 114, and onto the obvious residential planning of Carroll Road. Any commercial use, would definitely be out of place and a violation of the trust that we have put in the City of Southlake to first, serve it's community. I am sure you would agree, but another letter in hand can not hurt. Lastly, I want to thank you for your time and consideration, in reading this letter. Feel free to respond, if you desire, to the address above. Once again, thank you. Sincerely, Michael Howe • REC'D DEC 161996 11C-L-F\ I 1 1 1 S January 29, 1997 TO: City of Southlake Planning & Zoning RE: Cases #ZA 96-130 #ZA 96-131 #ZA96-132 Greetings: My name is Gary S. KraII and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 204 Sheffield Ct. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed along Highway 114. The first concern is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than likormally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the ongested big cities nearby. Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life. The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from everything Southlake has to offer. A concentrated commercial/industrial park with everything from: 1. retail to manufacturing, 2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and 3. no definite buffers between commercial uses and homes or schools. All these things strike me as making all the same mistakes towns like Irving, Arlington, Grand Prairie and Garland, etc. have made in the past. This can only work to lower the property values of our homes, add to the crime rate, create environmental problems and increase traffic problems to an unbearable level. Much of the proposed development will put commercial/industrial businesses right next to schools and increase the traffic on Carroll Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue. Although I live South of 114, I see 114 as the "Gateway" to Southlake. Any undesirable development will bring down everyone, not just those North of 114 or nearest to • REC'D JAN 3 0 1997 • the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114. Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer. Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and fire protection, etc. must be addressed before the City of Southlake can give approval in any way to the Timarron proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract; otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish. Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of development just to supposedly lower my taxes. I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived development. Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any decisions on this rezoning issue. S 7E-q j r January 29, 1997 TO: City of Southlake Planning & Zoning RE: Cases #ZA 96-130 #ZA 96-131 #ZA96-132 Greetings: My name is Paul Hendrickson and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 200 Sheffield Court. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed along Highway 114. The first concern is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than On ormally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the congested big cities nearby. Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life. The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from everything Southlake has to offer. A concentrated commercial/industrial park with everything from: 1. retail to manufacturing, 2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and 3. no definite buffers between commercial uses and homes or schools. All these things strike me as making all the same mistakes towns like Irving, Arlington, Grand Prairie and Garland, etc. have made in the past. This can only work to lower the property values of our homes, add to the crime rate, create environmental problems and increase traffic problems to an unbearable level. Much of the proposed development will put commercial/industrial businesses right next to schools and increase the traffic on Carroll Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue. Although I live South of 114, I see 114 as the "Gateway" to Southlake. Any undesirable development will bring down everyone, not just those North of 114 or nearest to S REC'D J AN 3 01997 _ IF-yz `� r . the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114. Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer. Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and fire protection, etc. must be addressed before the City of Southiake can give approval in any way to the Timarron proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract; otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish. Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of development just to supposedly lower my taxes. I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived development. Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any decisions on this rezoning issue. -( • OF-L136 1 e following fonn may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. FERENCE NO.: ZA 96-132 (renotification) am (in favor of) opposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: &))()) O� �-a (SEE COMMENTS BELOW) RECD J 1997 SIGNATURE: 8 4 HERNDON,BOYD K ETUX SUSANN K (Please Print Name) Boyd and Susan Herndon 1201 ASHMORE CT _ _ SOUTHLAKE TX �s 1201 Ashmoore Court ADDRESS: �s24c02 Our family lives at 1201 Ashmoore Court in Highland Estates. Our home is located at the corner of Ashmoore Court and E. Highland St. and thus our house is contiguous to the property which is referred to as "Tract III" in Timarron Commercial 's proposal. We have the following comments concerning the proposed zoning changes: (1) SAFETY ON E. HIGHLAND ST. E. Highland St. is a narrow two lane street • which serves as one of the primary routes to Johnson Elementary School and Carroll Intermediate School. The most recent proposal from Timarron Commercial calls for "minor access" from the commercial development to E. Highland St. Additional traffic on E. Highland St. would pose a very significant safety threat to students in the Carroll Independent School District. Our family requests that, as a condition to approval of any zoning changes to Tract III, the Planning and Zoning Commission require Timarron Commercial to agree that the development plan will not include ANY access to E. Highland St. (2) BUILDING HEGHTS IN TRACT HI. The most recent proposal from Timarron Commercial would allow the construction of SIX STORY buildings in Part A of Tract HI. This portion of Tract III is directly across the street from Highland Estates, a residential neighborhood for over 15 years. Construction of SIX STORY buildings in Part A of Tract III would destroy the residential character of Highland Estates. Our family requests that any buildings in Part A of Tract III be limited to two stories. (3) BUILDING SETBACKS IN TRACT HI. In addition to the building heights, our family is very concerned with the building setbacks proposed for Part A of Tract III. In order to preserve the residential character of Highland Estates, our family requests that the building setbacks for that portion of Part A of Tract III which is directly south of Highland Estates (Ashmoore and Blythe) be set at a minimum of 300 feet. Thank you for this opportunity to give input on these critical issues. S Boyd, Susan, Sarah and Laura Herndon Dan and Carla Hemyari 550 Cherry Lane • PO Box 92605 Southlake, Texas 76092-2605 March 13, 1997 W. Ralph Evans City Council Member - Place 1 do City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: ZA 96-132, Timarron Commercial, Tract III- with special emphasis/attention to area labeled as Bubble "C" Dear Councilman Evans; We are homeowners at the above address, which is located in Briarwood Estates. Our subdivision is a small neighborhood that is located north of Highway 114, and to the west of Kimball Avenue. It is comprised of ten (10) single family residences, and five (5) • duplexes. We have lived here twelve years, and are very concerned about the zoning request made by Timarron Land Corporation in the above referenced zoning application, as recently approved by Planning and Zoning. We wish to make known to you, who have the authority and power to recommend that the rezoning application be accepted, rejected, or changed to meet the quality standards the City of Southlake imposes on new development (which gives our city the fine reputation it deserves) the following issues and/or concerns: 1. Property values. If zoning is passed as reflected in the Planning and Zoning Commission approval, the result will be devastating to our property value. Although the tract known as Timarron Commercial - Tract III is currently zoned as "AG", when selling property in this subdivision market time has proven to be around eighteen (18) months. This is due to a number of current adverse market conditions, which include but are not limited to: air traffic noise from DFW Airport; commercial influence that borders the east, south, and west of the subdivision; and an ever-increasing traffic flow on Highway 114 (which is the only access into the subdivision, as well as the only exit from the subdivision). The best marketing feature of properties located in this subdivision is the little remaining rural appeal, which is currently limited to the property that borders our neighborhood to the north and can be identified as Timarron Commercial - Tract Ill - Bubble C. RE CD 2 1397 a 2. Traffic concerns. As mentioned above, the only access to and from our neighborhood is from Highway 114. Access is limited to traffic traveling westbound • on Highway 114 and turning right (north) onto either Cherry Lane or Briarwood Drive; or traveling eastbound on Highway 114 and utilizing the crossover to turn left onto Briarwood Drive. This crossover now also services traffic coming into and out of the new Kroger store, and soon, the new Home Depot store. Although this crossover serves as our only link to Highway 114 eastbound, and is now in greater use than ever, no accommodations have been made to aid residents of our neighborhood in accessing the highway. Time required to cross over Highway 114 westbound and access the eastbound highway ranges from one (1) minute to ten (10) minutes. Ten minutes may seem like a short period of time, but try sitting in your car, unable to exit from your own neighborhood unless willing to take a great risk (and sometimes not even then). Of course, traffic is not always like that, but then not all our activities can be after midnight! To compound the problem even further, traffic exiting from Kroger should only be making a right onto eastbound Highway 114. Fifty-percent (50%) and upwards make an illegal left onto the highway, making the crossover and highway even more difficult to access. An additional concern is the traffic increase that will result from the opening of the racetrack, as well as further development westward on 114. 3. Concerns about zoning changes requested. There are several items of concern regarding the zoning requested by Timarron Commercial - Tract III (as a whole, and concerning Bubble C in particular). Even with deletions and SUP's we find the • following zoning categories undesirable and unacceptable for the entirety of Tract III: B2 and 02. Therefore, acceptable Bubble A zoning would be limited to Cl, C2, C3, HC, B 1, 01, and/or CS. Furthermore, as our neighborhood will be as greatly impacted by any zoning changes, if not more so, than other neighborhoods adjacent to Timarron Commercial - Tract III, we find the only acceptable zoning categories for Bubble C to be 01, CS, and/or Residential - and would strongly urge the commission to find these three zoning categories to be the only zoning allowed in Bubbles A, C, and D. 4. Water/Drainage concerns. As portions of our neighborhood sits at a lower elevation than the majority of Tract III, especially Bubble C, we are concerned that current drainage problems that we experience will be greatly increased. Homes in our neighborhood are not part of any city or development sewage system, rather we are currently using septic systems to handle our waste water. During times of heavy rainfall we already have severe problems with drainage, and fear that any increase in water runoff caused by development could cause significant health and safety issues. 5. Increase in crime. As we have already witnessed a growth in crime along with the growth in population, we are especially concerned with having businesses spring up all around us - and in our back yards. As mentioned earlier, the property to our north (Tract III - C) is the only undeveloped space neighboring us, and the developed properties already around us is all non-residential. • We were both discouraged and disappointed that Timarron Commercial - Tract III -Bubble C was the only section of the four sections comprising the entire tract that did not limit zoning categories being requested in consideration of adjacent residential neighborhoods. Bubble C is not only a piece of land to be developed —its tenants will be our neighbors. If Timarron Land Corporation continues to act without consideration to the fact that this tract is the only remaining non-commercial land bordering our neighborhood, and its development will have a significantly negative impact on us, we can only imagine how difficult any future relationship with them will be. We were further disheartened when reading a recent newspaper article about the approval of the zoning request by Planning and Zoning in which a P&Z commissioner was quoted touting her own horn for protecting the Highland Avenue residents. If you are unfamiliar with the neighborhoods in question, please drive by. A cursory glance will prove to you that Briarwood Estates will be much greatly impacted by the Timarron development than the "protected" Highland neighborhoods located on Ashmore Court and Stanhope Court (the impact on these subdivisions compared to ours seems minimal). With the exception of the December work session (I attended a college graduation) and the meeting when the commission voted to approve the request (I was involved in an auto accident) I have attended every meeting during which this request was on the agenda. I voiced my concerns — and feel as if they went unheard. As residents of this neighborhood and of the City of Southlake we do not want to be ignored — not be Timarron Land Corporation or the city. We do not • want to be totally swallowed by commercial properties. We will be out of town and unable to attend tonight's meeting. Please take our concerns seriously when deciding the fate of our neighborhood. Thank you. Sincerely, Oft} Dan Hemyari Carla Hemyari • IIII December 12 , 1996 To: The City of Southlake, Texas Mayor Rick Stacy City Council Members Planning and Zoning Commission Members Timarron Land From: North Carroll Avenue Homeowners Re : Proposed Commercial Development, "Tract 2" , bounded by Hwy. 114 , Whites Chapel, Primrose Lane and Carroll Avenue ******************************* The mixed-use, commercial PUD Zoning requested by Timarron Land is vehemently opposed by the adjacent property owners . Our objections have been expressed in writing and verbally at SPIN meetings and at a P&Z meeting. They include, but are not limited to, the safety and security of our children at the three schools on Carroll Avenue, the diminished quality of life in our residential neighborhood, the certain reduction of our property values, negative impact on the environment, wastewater disposal, groundwater runoff and flash flood issues and increased traffic among many others . S We have been told that several of our concerns are not properly addressed at this juncture and will be addressed at a later date when site plans are developed. If this is the process it is illogical and should be changed for the benefit of the City as a whole . We have no confidence that any owner will protect our interests at a later date . We believe development and planning must be responsive to the needs and wishes of the residents . We further believe the pastoral , semi- rural environment is the single most important reason that residents have selected Southlake for their homes . No one, either with the City or Timarron Land, has offered a credible explanation of how the proposed commercial development will in any realistic way benefit the residents . We have carefully considered all the various aspects of commercial development on this tract . We request that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council recognize our legitimate and reasonable expectations that : 1 . There be no direct or indirect vehicular access from the tract onto Carroll, Whites Chapel or Primrose . 2 . There be no buildings, paved areas, signs, lights or commercial structures of any kind permitted within 350 feet of Carroll, Whites Chapel or Primrose or any adjoining property owners lot line . III 3 . There be no construction of any buildings, signs, lights or r1E-VS • (2) IIIstructures of any kind exceeding two and one-half stories in height . 4 . A comprehensive study of wastewater disposal, groundwater runoff and flash flood potential by competent professional engineers be completed prior to approval of any zoning changes . 5 . That all existing natural resources including wetlands, ponds and trees be preserved and protected from damage, drainage or destruction. 6 . That effective and generous buffer zones be established and described with specificity by the developer. These buffer zones are to protect the peace, enjoyment of quality of life and property values of the neighboring property owners . 7 . That zoning be restricted to low-impact, low-noise, no-odor occupancies such as office and community services and exclude occupancies such as theaters, amusements, hotels, motels, restaurants or health club facilities which, by their nature, will attract transients . 8 . That deed restrictions be imposed to permanently preclude any variances . 1111 9 . That a minimum 25% of the total acreage of Tract 2 be zoned for single family residences on one acre lots around the interior perimeter. Mayor, Council and Commission. . .please consider how each of you personally would feel about commercial development literally across the street from your homes . Please also consider the health, safety and security of the children in the three schools on Carroll . Thank you. S 9E,9 ...„, ., • _ ___ . .....______ ____.____ _ _.._______._'-'-.''•;\1- .l._. ,.l ;-• -----.-,-1- :f,:1D 7fO'V--_E:--i-•1• .3-- '.:..1 -c"I 1mF_-g.=-•_=,/)--.'I-'L-A'7.'.,-„ ---7 :"Z-•02 s1 M .G,PI.L.1A1.114N11D/ .t—l\4ie 0q. "..".l- ...td•‘..r t,: -iC-A41-11-711-_Pl0-„si.1-i-'"fef.1i1r- 2ki—zr.f1 24t AW «m 1 +I- 1_ , . , ,1i \ P. I:._ 0/ 100/0.• 2000V...-.- 4'/00,'. \ 6 0D 0 — e SCAL 4000 , ,.. .. .. ,, • ra li irirmirrriZ,"-11 kill 11V--"; •••••• ..... .... t g '41.1i 1 F.:1"4,11"- 11' I kal-11.1"11111) I - mpLigi .•_ i li ip"`""' •ROJECT , 1 FT\ i La,___ Loct- ioN 1E f . , . 5....",,i RI • pri"-rimomm _ _ 7 :11,1: 1117 'I V'Polar-AM--17-da \I " \ .011111Ef i i 1 i Niiiii GRA,7EviNE ';4---) , • It' i --- • imi 731 1 i . A1143.11Miiiimmim ,-L.... . i ... ... NITAVIOLIII"I 11 I 1_1 1 Pk' ." 'I 1 ,.... 1 ,•>', ..... r.'',, 1 r .6, i , I .......... , . . TRACT III SEPTEMBER IVA CflYSOIfflDIJ. PROJECT LOCATION MAP flY OE SOU'IDLAKE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS CA101,11 & BURGESS.INC FOR 200 822 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEvELDINENT 1 710727Pl'''7.('?'/17,7NP, 70.19,4'',,).i,,', ,4 '77,,,,, ' • ''',/:',. .'':,.,.•*17,7r,if 't 044//it:4;,,';XI. '1'7144,90 IP,,-',,7-4' '.,k&Vr.,177,1,,,,,,,rive,.,,,,,,,v,,.ilp,,,,,,:.,,,,,,,ya.„.„Fp„307...,,,,,, ,, . .44,frktr: ''' "''. t ' ' I'1,,'",;'';94,i V l',''' '',4'''AN 4'4A4''t, ii) ,n,0,11 D ,;.''',tr'', ii"!‘. t, f'0;:„. '•Ii.4,m1,6',414,,.ppes.„.t„,,,,,.1,,,,,,,..,401.,; ,,,‘! 1.' ,,,Li!....;',4,,.‘ vir .,,,'T,',F,t414;kil,si ,:!,4 1),'';7';#•!", 4101,:,..10 ,;,,,V, ',At 4 4.4 q,,,,4,. It ',. [ ''''',, ;L i ', .':V ,,, ''',',1,„:$' t4 '1%,;,,,,:','0 ,, '1,2.yt'gi ',,'..4.',,,;',4 1 4 a.,,'' Ji,),„:1104e;;',,,f,'',,,qr,z"..i.ft,,, ''.4 t,.',14"1 VIO litog ', 1 1,y),,,,,, ,4. ,.,,, v„:,...),,,,4r;,,,,",V.74Y,'0:)b :::,N,''* %."1116:41 li''4.- •;, ' li,',.3. ','.•',,„11'k L_ , ... ,s; __'. ' ' , ",,,,p,%,';,,,I,':',A 441;1;AO I Uri,,,,,"'A 2..g,l',,"3770..4.,,,;,(074ellhi a"li*,,,d','Mr..-,. .8,,4e„'"I'.11), ;',:.7,1.!IPII,,b.r.':-',.6.4.A.'he.;4, 4.,,44,/,.-41t it,.0.;,/,.'„'i;4.t,;”,','i4',;1:'''/0.,),),,;.e,i' ,i,,',,,,•,,'''',,,'"7,,p,,,E6 Vir,,','4,t, ,,,,',,,,,.• //:, .444,'A h.i6Eer.A.,,"1.S,,,P.P.N,..,1.0.,.-44.,-:'/;:,..•:.;:,%"4 Z g 0, ------ —- •--- 1.\'& • ' ' ,.-.' -- SL.go..i....- i•• ..,,...4_,.....,^ .4. ..,..... 1,46110.611100ailiiiikaiiiii TRACT MAP ...1,1 ,,,, , , i _.: ,,, • . ::: .... --- - , -. - . ., , -t "_ _.] __ i1iL IASI'mu.. :I0 S'IAPYP ; : ' ; '"I 1 -- :1:W.--.1.'rl.t.l.rk-1� • \ /: 7. _. Ind :,� ,,.0 es� 9 11 13, 1 a :� -- \ ol1:,T :t , e.a �,.. Z - ^!.. is„ ,.�( I ---a AM „ a:!%146 0 ,•• �- -�� • _w ... ::.Y. •a 0. 150 300 600 900 my - q \I / SCALE I'.600' ,r -il I o CAlrfit-. v — -- 20 w. 33 Aa�9 ,.�Aiiitei, ;I di _.. 2I vo Q '':._�•��"' _ 3 '• e iP n r� „0 •... Niftyµ® .. • a 1 •_ \ : ' ' ' . f) NA!.EV 3 1 11 .7:- 8--1 ,. epfWIff' 0III_ •Cs1A1--1 _ _- _ .,,LEGEND iNI® \ - - _` r \ - - I IDENTIFICATION NUMBER I .,..._ I/ •- - I __ (see Fropary owner's lint) Y / r TRACT III (JIY'MUGR ,ft• EXISTING ADJACENT LAND OWNERS MAP (All (k til eINIINAKIi,'I'ANHAN'f(Y IIINII','17.7CA.S l'Ail'I1:R & Illllt(i1:tiS,IN('. 1((11t 201.k22 A(III I'It(IPI I,I!II 1'IANNIJI 11NI1 III.VI:I/ll'RII.NI ,,,f m .p ,Vc4f r"'o q. S y g 'Sdl"'!gl1l6 im,, i^:. ii")"4 s^...'.1�1u+t, 4',, ':ivn ti- ',,, Jr: U. 1 a w; A r Y }. ip W �` is�"� ( '' x_ *4� :tire a,l' kygj • ' ,' ii*A ,),,,„ : ,,.,.,,,,„ ` ,,,,,,,,,, ,,., „,„, „ SPIN 114 JANET MURPI-IY 11111111111.1.1 ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING SPIN /16 1)0116 AND RANI A FIFP.CI:. • ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING FOR ZA96-132 03-Jan-97 Owner Name Zoning 01 HEWITT, R. SF-1A 02 THOMAS, D. SF-1A 03 HERNDON, B. SF-1A 04 KREYCIK, C W AG 05 BRAUN, F. SF-1A 06 KNIGHT, H. AG 07 CARTER, L. AG 08 COOK, S.KATHERINE SF-1A 09 HARDIN, R. SF-1A 10 QUINN, M. AG 11 RODGERS, C. AG • 12 RECORD F. AG 13 HUNING, E. AG 14 MCMANUS, S. AG 15 MILLER, H. AG 16 BERRY, C. AG 17 STEGALL, M. AG 18 TRANSPORT UNION HALL 0I 19 ESPINOSA, L. AG 20 REMMER, B. AG 21 TAYLOR, E. AG 22 RODGERS, L. AG 23 KNIGHT, J. SF-1A 24 RESTER, M. SF-1A 25 HEMYARI, D. SF-1A 26 RUIZ, C. SF-1A • 7E 52 L-1 • # Owner Name Zoning 27 HOWELL, D. SF-1A 28 PAFEL, T. SF-1A 29 BERK, L. AG 31 PETERKA, C. C3 32 FECHTEL GROUP, THE C3 33 GREENWAY-CARROLL ROA C3 34 D/FW-CARROLL ROAD LTD AG 35 STEELE, R. AG 36 PERIMAN, L. AG 37 SCHENK, J. SF-1A 38 COLLINS, T. SF-1A 39 JOHNSON, D. AG 40 CARROLL ISD CS 41 EUBANKS, M. AG • 42 PATTERSON, C. AG • 2 t 7E 53 City of South lake, Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY OCase No: ZA 96-132 Review No: Three Date of Review: 6/13/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for "NR-PUD" Zoning -Tract III Timarron Commercial, 200.822 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No.481 and in the Thomas Mahan Survey,Abstract No. 1049 APPLICANT: PLANNER/ENGINEER: Timarron - Westerra Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7605 Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas. Texas 775247 Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/9/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. 1. Correct the typo error on page DR-13, last paragraph, first line. * P& Z Recommendations (2/13/97): Subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996, with the following amendments: i * no impervious coverage in the flood plain with the exception of trails; (shown on DR-18, second bullet) * 50' bufferyard on the north property line of Tract IIID; (shown on Bufferyard/Open Space Exhibit, after DR-16) * 4:1 slope from Timarron's property line versus the residential property line; (shown on DR-13) any "HC"Hotel District uses in Tract IIIC will be located at least 400'from the north property line; (300' shown--to be consistent with other similar setbacks throughout Tracts I and II, see note on Concept Plan) * Applicant will comply with the Landscape Ordinance, and for every story from two (2) to four (4), they will add 1% of the lot area to the required landscaped area, and for every story from five (5) to six (6), they will add 2% of the lot area to the required landscaped area; (shown on DR-16, DR-18) * "CS" Community Service uses will be added to "B-1"Business Service Park and "0-1"Office uses in the additional notes for "crash-gate"access to Tract ILIA; (shown in legend on Concept Plan) * the following "C-2"Local Retail Commercial uses would be permitted by Specific Use Permit only: duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset printing; (shown as SUP only on DR-9)) * "C-3"General Commercial uses would be limited to 20%of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB and "C-1"Neighborhood Commercial and "C-2"Local Retail Commercial uses would be limited to • 50%of the gross acreage in Tract IIIB and in Tract IIIC (See bottom bullet on page DR-17.) '7 E-5 • City of Southlake,Texas * A development plan specifying the intended use and development regulations for each proposed lot 111 must be submitted prior to or concurrently with the preliminary plat for this site. Subsequent development plans and site plans will be reviewed based on the appropriate zoning district regulations as determined by the proposed use. A traffic impact analysis will be required with the submittal of any development plan or site plan for this site. The TIA must encompass the entire tract and not just the portion for which the development plan is being submitted. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of a site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of the plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation of proposed buildings per §43.9C1e, Ordinance 480, as amended in areas subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone. • Masonry requirements per §43.9C 1 a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13, Ordinance 480, as amended; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Bufferyards according to Ordinance 480, §42 and §43 • Screening according to Ordinance 480, §39. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.480, as amended. • Driveway spacings and design criteria per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat must be submitted for approval and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee. Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * The applicant should be aware that any resubmittals required due to tabling to the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 1 7"revised reduction must be provided. 40: Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter & Burgess, Inc. L:AMVP-FILES\REV`96 96-I32CP.3 1E-55 f TIMARRON COMMERCIAL E • TABLE OF CONTENTS TRACT III DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • PERMITTED USES • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE • CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBITS • 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION • BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN • CONCEPT PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION • • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS • TRAFFIC STUDY • RUNOFF STATEMENT ,BCDJUN 09 1 ?07 June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 /C -569 ` PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • Timarron Land Corporation is requesting rP q g a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract III in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park" development allowing a variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure compatibility of land uses through creative planning. The Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning request will divide Tract III inlo four(4) separate parcels and will allow the following land use categories for each: PARCEL A • Residential* • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) PARCEL B • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • 02 - Office District (Sec. 19) • Cl -Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20) • • C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21) • C3 - General Commercial District (Sec. 22) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) PARCEL C • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • 02 - Office District (Sec. 19) • Cl - Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20) • C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-1 '7E-57 / 1 PARCEL D • • Residential* • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) * The Non-Residential PUD shall allow ancillary residential uses, limited to the zoning classifications RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 up to 10% of the land in the NRPUD (20.08 acres). The permitted accessory uses, specific use permits, special exception uses and development regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SF1A, SF30, and SF20 zoning districts set forth in Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • • June 9, 1997 96204401 R03 DR-2 r/E-5S ( PERMITTED USES • It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the zoning categories identified in this document (as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480) and shall specifically include those uses described as: • "Permitted Uses" • "Accessory Uses" • "Specific Use Permits" • "Special Exception Uses" • Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not been defined by current technology shall be subject to approval criteria established in Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 44.4, as amended. LAND USES There are exceptions to the permitted uses. Those uses identified with a double asterisk (**) • shall require a Specific Use Permit (SUP). Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract III. RESIDENTIAL I. Permitted Uses I. RE - Single Family Residential Estate 2. SF1A - Single Family Residential 3. SF-20 - Single Family Residential 4. SF-30 - Single Family Residential • June 9. 1997 ' 96204401.R03 DR-3 757-59 CS- COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT • I. Permitted Uses - BY SUP ONLY I. (DELETED) ** 2. Higher education institutions ** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers, and similar cultural facilities ** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs (No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges) 5. (DELETED) ** 6. Public safety facilities ** 7. Religious institutions ** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) • S . June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-4 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 7E-l00 • 0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT . I. Permitted Uses A. Office Uses 1. Accounting and tax preparation 2. Adjustment and collection services 3. Advertising agencies 4. Architecture 5. Banking 6. Bill paying services 7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only) 8. Business holding and investment services 9. Chamber of Commerce 10. Chiropractors 11. Computer services 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting 13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted) 14. Dentists 15. Duplication and mailing services 16. Employment services 17. Engineering 18. Finance • 19. Interior design 20. Land surveying 21. Law 22. Management consultants 23. Optometrists 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature 25. Physicians 26. Podiatrists 27. Psychiatrists 28. Psychologists 29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios 30. Real estate and insurance 31. Savings and Loan 32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices 33. Stenographic services 34. Title companies 35. Travel bureaus or services 36. Utility offices S June 9. 1997 ' 96204401.Ro 3 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 9E- t/ B. Community Facility Uses c ** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks ** 2. Recreation and open space ** 3. Libraries ** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) ** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character • • lune 9. 1997 ' 96204401.R03 DR-6 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 7E-1P2- 0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT 110 I. Permitted Uses A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities 4111 • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 7E 3 ✓ C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 41) II. Permitted Uses A. Commercial Uses 1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature 2. Bakeries 3. Barber and beauty shops 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats ** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores 8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or"take-out" food establishments 9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City hall, fire and police stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations). l . • • . June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-8 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only l C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT `/ • I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District ** 3. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias 4. Antique shops 5. Retail sail bakeries 6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops 7. Blueprinting or photostating 8. Book or stationery stores 9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers 10. Christmas tree sales 11. Cigar or tobacco stores ** 12. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats 13. Confectionery stores 14. Custom dress making or millinery shops 15. Dancing schools 16. Day nurseries 17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations 18. Dog and cat hospitals (excluding large animal clinics) 19. Drug stores 20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed • eight thousand (8,000) square feet ** 21. Duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset printing ** 22. Filling stations or service stations, operating with/without a convenience store 23. Financial institutions 24. Florist or gift shops ** 25. Frozen food lockers 26. Grocery stores and meat markets 27. Health service facilities 28. Jewelry stores 29. Leather and leather good shops 30. Optical goods 31. Photographs, portrait or camera shop and photo finishing 32. Radio and television sales and servicing 33. Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and "take-out" food restaurants 34. Shop repair services 35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair 36. Tailor ** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales 38. Variety stores • • June 9. 199' 96204401.R0' DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 'tE-(a5 ff C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT l • I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District ** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas 3. Coin and stamp shops ** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys 5. Commercial art galleries ** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 7. Department stores 8. Dry goods and notion stores 9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 10. Hardware, paint, and wallpaper stores 11. Hat shops 12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums 13. Hobby shops 14. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances 15. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 16. (DELETED) 17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers (excluding cemeteries, crematories and mausoleums) • 18. Music or record shops 19. Nursery buildings 20. Pet shops 21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies 22. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs 24. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work 25. Skating rinks, ice and roller ** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use permit (excluding sexually oriented businesses) 27. Toy stores ** 28. Upholstery shops - furniture 29. Variety stores • June 9, 1997 ' 96204401 ** Use Permitted DR-10 by SUP Only BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT SB-i I. Permitted Uses A. Office and Commercial Uses 1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District 2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations ** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly 4. Banks 5. Barber and beauty shops 6. Book and stationery stores ** 7. Computer manufacture and research 7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex 8. (DELETED) ** 9. Electronic manufacture 10. Funeral homes (excluding cemeteries, crematories, and mausoleums) ** 11. Lithograph, engraving, printing and publishing ** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment ** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments 14. Medical clinics • ** 15. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies ** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing 17. Private schools 18. Professional/business schools 19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex 20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure ** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing 22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters) ** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly 24. Studios for training in fine arts B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City Hall, policy and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) * Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP. • June 9. 1997 9620-1401.Ru3 DR-1 l ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 17E-U7 "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT t • I. Permitted Uses ** 1. Hotels and motels ** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned ** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned ** 4. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) 0 S June 9. 1997 _, 96204401.RO DR-12 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to all new or amended ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following exceptions: BUILDING SETBACKS Setbacks for Tract III land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across the street from residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan, the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where it is adjacent to residential areas. Setback Adjacent to Residential RES 35'* CS 100' Min.* • 01 100' Min.* 02 100' Min. Cl 100' Min. C2 100' Min. C3 100' Min. B 1 100' Min.* HC 100' Min ** * Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from the north porperty line at the site plan stage of approval. ** Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council resreves the option to require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school. • June 9. 1997 ' 96204401.Ro 3 DR-13 r1E BUILDING HEIGHTS • Maximum building heights for Tract III land uses shall be in accordance with the following table. Maximum Building Height RES 35' 2.5 Stories CS 35' 2.5 Stories • 01 45' 2.5 Stories 02 90'* 6 Stories Cl 45' 2.5 Stories C2 45' 2.5 Stories • C3 45' 3 Stories HC 90'* 6 Stories B 1 45' 2.5 Stories • * The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a maximum of four (4) stories or sixty (60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by S.U.P. only. • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-14 9 6'7° • BUFFER YARDS • Perimeter buffer yards for Tract III shall comply with the Comprehensive P Y p ns;<ve Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table: Adjacent to E. Highland, N. Kimball and North Property Adjacent to Line of Parcel III D Residential* Other RES 50' 25' 25' CS 50' 35' 25' 01 50' 35' 25' 02 N/A 35' 25' Cl N/A 35' 25' C2 N/A 35' 25' C3 N/A 35' 25' B 1 50' 35' 25' • HC N/A 35' 25' *Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street from Tract III. Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard type. S June 9, 1997 96204401.R0 3 DR-15 T.- 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION r • ADJACENT TO N. KIMBALL AVENUE, E. HIGHLAND STREET AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL IIID. (IF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF PARCEL BID IS RESIDENTIAL AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW) e 50' BUFFER YARD L dJl CO f z A V iii o All a, 0 ct ,,......0 - , • ,ro. 4r ,:L. . ii PARKING - N *ill ;% `„ 111111011111611)1 C�" 3'-8' HT. ib MEANDERING ��a--_____ � 1 +•�.,� BERM . (AVG. 5' HT.) 3 • JUNE 9, 1997 96204401.I I I r/E '' LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE • LANDSCAPING The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping will be provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2) to four (4) plus 2% for every story from five (5) to six (6). OPEN SPACE The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas. A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be performed at the development plan stage of the approval process. There will be no impervious coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of pedestrian trails. S Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master design guidelines that respond to tree preservation, at the development plan stage of the zoning process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake, as those requirements are developed. The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed buffer yards and open space for Tract III. S . June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-16 ' . 0 • • • . . ,,.. .. miGuLittp...,sTREET .— •t ' - ' '-4 '. •- ' ... --"---,..,:.,.-----\y,.:7,------- -- -------' •:-..!:-.--,- --------"---',-Li—Al.(', -1 " '') ' • ' ". • ' • '- - ,14 „,;„- :_"--i:1.1,'... ._-i---7. :.•;.....;--,....--...,--a,-, -...•,-4.. ,-_-_-_-•--_.:.._,.-.--t-......--3,-....-.,..-.-.7i7 Si?.It-71..-,...7,..-'S:2'..10.7.."?. :`..4-'37.......... ..,41......--A__ ,,....7."_,...,.... ___ _. _,,,:__4:14.,.,,,, ,, 1 r , TT ,. ;,.. ' r. .i..-.....- ,o\, ,-- . -...'', •,--' :-' ,... ',.•s.-:: ,. " •• - - - ' \\k•, '' ' i ) , ' . ,,... .,,'..,• , -... ...v-,,,,,', 7.1 . /I_ • . I,' '' Ilit''I'A.'.'^' '.• .., •I 1-'-!, I .. 1.1, ,5 .)' ,. • . ,, • . •./I '1',)).)''''). ‘j)' •. '. •'• . 11 l'' I. •^1 I . : ) "••). •\-'I' 1. .-rr'zi ,..i• . ,,- . '''f.' , - i - '-' 14ft\‘. :• '-': i'')'..:'• ...- ./. '' ,;; ',I.! :,''"',„,....,. :,',.,'; I,j,•,^'I '. ' ' 4', , ' I \' ) ' '- . .' ', ' .- "''', I ,-.- ''--,". ''')-.. Ii.)."I '''.-^ '..). 1,-, .= .,.,.,„ ,,.!L.) •f,.- 4t"-_:-1.4.0.-.',......).1.:.:.,...2 ' ..:. . " it; .,' •-.0,. ', !,' ,; .t . ; ..--.D- - , .' . Hu, : . ' '. , , ,,--::.--, -, I".)7,.5^,I',. '::'.' (, -._-:'.4-'' - ' '` r-'.' )-?).''I;'.='^i': ''";-..:1-t.'7.r."^-7..''''' -•• 4•^'''''''',ill II Il'Ij pi. ,...,;.'0.'------- -, , ‘,...., , __- -.-.,........-.... 1..., ,.. .t. i. ,..,--;.: ...,., ..,r•-- , 4,.,,:- ....-- ._ I:. ..'..---A,r •! ii!1 1 1,-'.„r, 4,•.i-/, ',.'., ,. ;:- - 1 , •-.y.,- ---- c: ..,-;\,-,-icii'..c2,,co-,4.,,_..,.._....i .ca-3-.,,,, . -..- , - .. - .,- ..c.,. - .. ,, „. ...$0'111Ufr13141,17PAP,,,, ,ftti--.S?Ac..2-R „i-F•1). : ',..:-, \,-_-_ , 50'"iii/ 0311..-YXRD'Vfkr'Elt•SPA , Q - :---,--f.-,- ----1,- ---'.-...---- • ' ' " ' , - , \ i 1 ,'--,',-;AttcAN:.r,"","rae,H1QiiI-AtiP sTR4rr, , \)i: .,, ' ' 0, "", .___,..-..ii.An- &04.t,,,r- •.,-,-,,c, HyrvRa- .,,,FIEs' .- ._ ..:,_•172,-.;:z---.....:.- c--4,I _-_„..._,,,,_,,,11., l'' - " ',,,i'r,'Is''''A Ill I -'''Illtizi4',...,144%V'%'---- \)) 1 i(i) ••------. --, RE9 T°'LlE'-43f-f1,1P.'44-3 •-•------ ---- -• '..- • ,, , • ' •,,, , , t'',.-- '',,-,41',,,:.,\i‘t 411 \ -'. / ,,,,.....,,,,,yr LAGE., V\ ).,..f. ,:.‘i'••L . i .c..•."--•:1•.:':-.,z.:f :--.77=.---.,--::-- 7-,•_:- '''' :-,••:,---.).:•.,);.i; II,i ':,j.-`, ' i 1 i • r. k . ' • I'f', ' '1"''-- .'",I'AIII'II!'I)111 I /.,I,'• I ;lid'ir ^) i_I)1 L)))I 'I'-.1 ;).__,;1'.=)''-''''.'"- III'.,'-•". ft''' .) ) ,,,\ I'), I 1)6,, \,,,'. ^,•;. ^'•'^ :'-'''''-' ''- , -.^',r_..- --‘':• . - :. ., '.. I; )•.!.'r ii:fI;ii 3M ,IPSPITert YAOFtiratit4 f SPACV KEOVIREO'•,..:, .,.,:•!..;1'\•.,)),?.../....,,,/,.;/7;i)ii• i(_______..-...\•If',...,:,:fl,1 i f , __.-,„,-,_- ----- . -•\kl.:......- 'i fit''...-*•:":.-2.,?._ .,...q j-t•:' , / !WI 1 i'•dt,i. i f------:.---Ki.il 4/t,t f —-4,))^'-•1 .01A.s•EziT 16 ', , RP-StDEI‘rnAL C ',.(--..::.- ' : ,•,,).',. %,,, ,--:.• ;4)(\) )\141i f , .1 yti•;;ti•J:. '' - _,-- 5= - ". ::1-: ', ..',,,,,L__;-_-,,,,:---;-1-, t,„P,N,,;;10 l -, .--_..-:--(--,E,...,,-,--,),---, -_ ;,,01 \ ... ,---,,.., ,-, •:-:,_....1,-,, --,,,,.,,,,'-',,.,i'„,.,//,-,,:-----.../1,..\-..,-,,,r%\le, (. i, ,.-,‘,..,i•'''.'-'.z..-.,---c=i;' - --- - .-, r, ,1 e . r' ..), L , ,, -',-. ‘.\.'.4\'')\\I 1 ' '',V,.'''',::'', '4._----,:,'---;,,i.,,,,,.. - -*-, -,'-•,4.,,.;;.41 '1' -- ",....-".'...,=',, "•-•"-A -,- '.''`A`..." /.f-"-7:":--,,,,_ ------_-."--_,- '.-.• k 't l'e- 1-• -.-7,,..,..., •t .. ,;:i..,_r ..r. i - ..,?.,, ,,,,, ,- !,. ._. ,t.----c: t..:•,,./..,,f,, N...„.....,‘ 1•1::.7,;..' i . It, - •., ji , . . , , ;- - .. .._.:-,---- -•,..) .---- -,-_.-/- '•-- ;- ---ki : --,';''..-:!-Ir=:-":,, '-.----'1' .j-t•'• - ' ----.;----..1 , ...-.-I- ---‘ "' '' ' - ' '- ' ' '' '' -•iimilitrataminSt c -) e kfir----./• 1-7-re:11,..'•-•.-=-.--7"-- ',"---",:' .."'''',.-k,„ .,....."''-----4'11`, .. ------(.- .--, ---; , ,,,,,,,,,,,., • ...,....-,-,;1;3.40‘-„,.....)---1--- / ‘,so<....,.....„(-,--A.V ‘• ,. 'Ws"..)K---- .1,I - Q • ', } I , - ' - , ' i.-'''''''`'''''''''''III"' -t N' ' '- - ' 'e ' I . 1/4,'1 1 r• ' '-'ti 7', <, '",,'',' r.3.i- i ' - ,',--,',..•'g 'it ,1 ''4-'1:- '''''•• ' '''1'' - " •, OPEN AOlt,/,.--!' , , -'. ••'' 'Y''' r'''e,Y',. • ' ,_ , - --2''''')$,',•ii ••••.,..1 ti, ' ' . ' `• ' ..-' , ' \. — . 41 i• • -- --.....,..:,-# .i-----1.•"`"-:', • i.z.,:t",,,-"-,... , -„., '• :,:' " , ,,,,,A,‘ ' .,, • ,: ,,, ' -'- ,,, - i ! • , ---- -- ',..'_,,„ \'--!_ ) -I,/,IP,''.=:''' '-"••,Ii,.; ,f5::A.1,^'''''-'-‘ II."-';',:"-ts.,..1-.^'^,^^,',"-:".I''''/ i•l•I.^ -^ - •.', .‘" •.. • -' * ' ' : . ' _ ' - '-'"^")._ 'I'I'."-',.', • '\ 'N, ' r./ ' !:r;1! •; r!'j r ,r r'I 'C '/'j//!/i/../'. .. '. ,rtr:',..,” ..;L/2,"'•-.7 4,../.' .' - ' ////7.7 1 1/ Yr j/li//i/ • r# / _ ,, ,.J 'r ;l r / ) ,/ 1 -' / / , /. '7 Yr/r rr _';_r..rrjrrk-,,,/,.-;:.:3:•::,•' ,_,.4 ' 'I. ''''111-I/TI''''t{,-',I.i ..,.. . ,... ) ' - .' '•.. • \ ..,,r,""' 1 . ,-; \::,, - ,•, • : ,,..„ , ..,„!..-1,1i., 1,/,',,e . • ' - i ....., _,..•••...- _.... •!•I.-.'' ; t < • , --,. . . . ..,. •-, 0, •rat,, ,., , ,., t• ' - \ .- : .• ,-, . , ,'•,, L,: ,Hy" 1, ' ,L,i'i;'),61,,h0 3e'‘''1•I'v,k,1%,„ '' , •'.•ii, '- -• 1 - 4 " ,\• , ' - ., ' ' ','i I 1•1“ N i - ,'••.. . ' i''''''''''''Li'' ' - .'[ ' , .s. ,,,,, , , , ,;;; 1 ...4.••<I .,;('' \;/) <'•,..).; ' V" ; ' ` ,,,,,i., „. , r,--,i____ •,__ ,,,'t',.7-,..:\.1*-c ) I,i 1 1• r, i _-- - . \ --:, '.'s ''''.')'' ,".4,,, 4..j ,.4..."-. I .:) , : . j , '' '•' '' • ', X , ,..,.':.,..' .:,4•'''' '. ,,./....6;;4 ,-',''`--^...) ''''','I1/4 F. ,.:,0-1;,.,,,.....,,,.,...,-",...,....-7-i,.4774...-:,'41:1..•-;-' )/1 4A.^' I 'I'^'S,',' ,,..../ ' iI,1 ': ' ''I ' • "I'''''.I i ,i,, ,,"'..^7. ..^^`,,,', '1,./ .I.._,);,......' .,:,''•I)1- (., r' I(II...,2II: ),, ,,,I'II ".r-_,;.4:•.-4.,..,‘-r.?'_16--:"-:::=.7.___,,,'",--,-7..,:,--,..-":1t...--:" :-;/;-"''1.I ''.,(,'. , $:.-- 1 i' 4,, ,, : -:,,"i•_ \',',,, , :if _.,.-I-,-,,,_"",,..,.:,•-•--.._:-T,.-z-„,.....,,,of,--.-,, ,A • ..-* \c-..-:,....,,,,,i'a_-,,,,,:.,/lic,i.7.4. JA""' : -:.--ifIrcyARDi:,:jek:tbipliiNc.....,,I.;::',..C13,...;::',•0.tiMED_ ),..,;'. ..":::',7--11-,;-.,:,...,./-:::•,,..., ... ".:11‘\\ i' i",/ 't'yf •.. .,,, - ....,,..,,.,,,,),...,-,-.',41'''''' ' ''- - •;,)'', .1 (it,, ,t, i' c —PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CORRIDOR .\'',('l i f ti 'PI l'i '1 '''' ' -'';';\-`, .'',,,' -- t''--.•',‘'.‘,t t' '\It tt i t ' ( '1'' ' • '' ' '- - ' t I '.'' ''fl ' ' 1=1 OVEIUAY REGULATIONS ,, ,f," •-,, AgAk.,,,,,....t.„.,..4,7L,•,..„.,„.,,. _ ,,. , , ,:.,...-,,......,_ ...,,,,_,.._,.:,„ .1 A , ("$, I' ,,L...?7,1,-, ."--,'''' ',_),' -1,7 a --...----..--: -••-;•;-,,-.---:_.'2' .-'kt:. / ,. ),t BUFFER YARDS OR OPEN SPACE - '= .: `' '' .';‘,10.('t. 'k L' ,4'. .,'''.,''',' ''''''t••,,f''''',.-,•, --, ,iiiipi....„,.\s, 1.4.17-),,, )„t ',_.)tr ' r ,. ,.; 1.....1 0-,-,N--,,-„,,,,,.-t_.,.1 i.r71t, ,,j.,'',1 .,1„.,-..; --- .1-;"/ j '' ' '' (' ) ' .' ' ' '''''.-..' '' 'rf.:1-i'''',.;) ; 'I 1 ''fj, C 1 ', ' 'cc- , •,-, .' ,f? ' (--.. .,---/-4,',-:pi ...--.. - ..,..--4.,,,,,--.',--:-.,-,r,,-...., ..,,-,,--li„., 1:3—PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE • ' ‘i ' t\ is I/f"t'' ^ '''-'•'''.. '0'i , I I) ) \) ' ' c, ir- , 1 1 , t -•", •--- •-* l•"••=',”--. .---1. - .'',L i LAND USE PLAN AS LOW-MEDIUM I I:i. , f>, '1,'1,/, ,..,,) ..... I.= 7 2. '- ,, / !Pi,/., ' ,',^1\ i I, ,,, f, '^ ,. t., , '..t,,: ,,f ---,,,,,-..!'.. „z•,' ''.',1'''`':,', I_. 1..,4'..,Iii-•.°'-'.`f i • : . t ,4,!' .I 1 )( '• 'n• 1 _' :, ' h • --;., ,;^',.'?,';,,.,' I ,t‘', ...'f,.•, i ,,' ,, , (' , .,, t. - --:----, ),,,,.jtc,i.i,:-..:-...'-...„•fr--:•:.•:- -,4_:._•••...,'.Lt.!..'• v.,.7 RESIDENTIAL i r ' '' ' 'I '' ' ' - ' . ' '"- " ' ' 5",'131.1-PER)ymiD(40PEN_§PACE)B.EPUIAFfit.- .,I",, i' :',..,0H2::---?1,!,f'.'Ill,7.1 ill,.,J.,,,f,, , i POTENTIAL WATERS OF TILE ., :',. ,.. r i..k /. I .,,,r. i Main/DOR n ay LULAY-.gittPlnAl!iCE 6, . '(). .`'... , 1 I /f i.,..),r, ,141 .,4,;'...I,, , ' ,;0' j• ri '1i'l\ 1‘ l' ' -,,,_, .. ""'""-,,,,, ,,s 'j,; ,','.1' I .1(:,y,.,, .. UNITED STATES I . .' .-.--.). i, ,,.:„; ? .; ,. •'IL i!, ,,,,, ,„1-,,,. .oh; ...„4. ,.., /II ". .::',k::.f:t4,--4:•!, ,''', '•, . , , tr.-, . i i 1,i . TRACT III OF til)171111AKI‘TARKANI BUFFER YARD AND OPEN SPACE PLAN JUNti 9,1997 I,Ill 20111121 Al'/(11 1•11,11NIS1•1/ I n^II ANNI•11 IINrr I VI"I I wham' l'I'll' COIJNIN,1-1IXAS I All 11•14 zi 1111,1111•NS,IN,' ,,,,,,„1,..,.,,,,, ",,'4",^‘I..,)",),, /•.1,ft ,f .f,..:'..'oi,' 0 '"t,:),I•ff'.' . „'44 kf'/..f/','/'•''''+'''''''''''. ''C''''I'''tni '.,t"/7 'r lr''':,t''/Ai' ::/./'1 '//''"' 7"1 "''-'1,C., ',..:,-,:""i"i", " "''" ' . ' Mi,:'1,‘''',!:"".7Mi",::','",%":..%.:E ^I7 I r -1...r.'",,,,./.,. • -•47,,, ',' 1• .. , q-.',0.•', 114... i. 4:04,,u,,,, .1,,,,,,,.0.,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„:,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,„,;,,,,0 ,,,,4,....{1 i,'%1',:0 , '„;/'”At,?1,,,M,f,' ,,'',',.r r'rr I.,;; ' r 7';;,,/c I r/r. ''''''°;11/1/1:/r '..?'''''; ri•P'/i '/':'0;4701 / r ir7;7',/I' ,'',1'',','',, ' ',77'4,4'1' `,' ',', ,‘;•',,,"4/ ',', •1,41.44;,,,' ;,' ••',. ', ,'', • ','''•/,', ,•' ; ' ' ' ' ' ' - ' • • CONCEPT PLAN • This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in sections 30 and 41 (as amended by Ordinance No. 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is seeking. TRACT III The following table demonstrates land uses categories permitted for each parcel within Tract III. The attached exhibit "Concept Plan" further illustrates the general location of each parcel. PARCEL Area LAND USE CATEGORIES A 32.23 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, BI B 77.76 ±AC CS, O1, 02, C1, C2, C3, B1, HC (-0 C 63.85 ± AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2, B1, HC D 26.98 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, B 1 SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS • Ancillary residential uses RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 20.08 acres for the entire Tract III Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac. • Access to East Highland Street will be restricted to one full access location for residential uses or one emergency "crash-gate" for CS, 01 and B1 uses. • Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from the north property line at the site plan stage of approval. • Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school. • Commercial uses (C1, C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50% of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIB or 50% of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIC. June 9, 1997 96204301.R03 DR-17 1E-75 • The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a •. miximum of four(4) stories or sixty (60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by S.U.P. only. • There will be no impervious coverage permitted in the flood plain with the exception of pedestrian trails. • The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping area will be provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2) to four(4) plus 2% for every story from five (5)to six (6). QUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and quality at the development plan stage for Tract III. The design guidelines will be available for review at the time of development plan submittal. i • • June 9, 1997 96204401.R0 DR-18 7F-70 • • • • • M I �1 —ON(B A SPIICIRC UTI'R LS IIC AND 01 USES IN MISONp!A SPPLIRC I/SF.R U IDENTIFED `�'f I'KI.C.++F,„. IDENTIFIED POR PARIS.DI.. AREA LIALL BE RPSUUCMD POR rAR4'1.DID TDI Cf1Y(UUNC7L •PA.{�Vl.:la'D ,., THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES TO A MAXIMUM OP FOUR(I) MP SETR TIP OMTI THE YO NORTH H Jar ACRES THE OPTION IO REQUIRE A STORIES OR STXIY(RI)FELT. L/NE A THE RITEOM LAN STAGE PROPERTY TLN!ACRES PROPOSED ZONING XIB RUEDTNO SEDUCE FROM THE FIFTH AND SIXTH STORY une AT n1E SITE PLAN!FADE PROPOSED ZONING \ NON -RESIDEN11AL PAC' T E NORTH PROPERTY STAGE LINE AT OILY,BE PERMITTED BY sus. NON -RESIDENTIAL EBUSINSSPA E' \ / THE NOR PUN KAOfl ONLY. 'ON -USE F' (REST E BAREST,PARC 10'DUPPPI PARE REQUIRED (RESIDFNYIAl,(S,01,Ell) 1r THE PROPERTYRESIDE TO no (R STING Z ,A Rl) EXITNO ZONING - AO ',BUFFER YARD\OP.SPACE REQUIRED NORTH IS ^"^^` EOS11NG ZONING - AD,Q EIOSIDIO LVD.- SEXED USE ADIAt]WI TO E MOIDANO STREET BEAM REQUIREMENTS TO BE EARS ENO LUD.- MIXED USE I PROPOSED LUD.. MIXED USE DEAN MINEDSTAGE AT THE SITE PROPOSED LUD.- MIXED RISE �I IIII, l I L , 1 LIRA- Elan LO UD.NIA AO . I - . _ I I�•�e■■ I1,,,•�, •1 IRA/ � _ 6 �lL ��]s _L► • —ci' ...l• I t�.J- . .- . .Y�1 a T � �rr■•■��• EE•� ti' .. � EAS'P IDGf D SC•ttlL�j �J [r��. 19 `r■ ■■ • r c ZAAA: igIFl1 �` amoviAND .��i (PROPOS 70'R.O.1 .• � I. .••• .;+Y d.� • .7,1R�',_��r'*I1 \ 1 r4 UM. .�— � .�Appal.,ION \ \` O �`� J I� • _ �`! r.� • Iqi °•OAnel w AOIEt O • 19,. ' i ... I. O '404 •;iw 11 LOD.WAm UfR ant 1111 WIFBI TAN .:. DT .. d O m ItI,L,07.... A� `__ i' ..RRmOA Y OBDE �' O• lOn-.A _ ._____ 1 Lun. uan lifitamm. .;,,,,•-:,,-;,-.:„;.-.,:-:,...:-,;,:-: 1 0 i50 JOO 1i00 r:+)L•NKibiliti ° '.) ,� Q IlA. r SCALE 1 600•Lu MB l,opP✓f1 �! ��. �� ''°P•.'o '> Luc.-1mc.Rrm o' O°• dilli-Cii..Ailk...eorksr'.71111:17..M.1 p f/ ,. l a T p/+�F�7�� y LUD_ 1'�1. p•wiw• J4° • • 7\ • ! .. 0 Z ► �/ I i + 1 LEGEND Y�'Y NL.3�F'i•• _ •.. •r1 .. \`. • � I, .' °o i �� \' 1` �. - - .e M c ,L-- I, .. ;'},�\\ M' pf I J—run- NUN.RSSIDrlmu'ULM,LSE •Mil • BJi' ili• • \�\ I O 1 11iiiNO • ,S U ,16 \ \ � (1 /•O• ..•�. ■ '' . '\` • ZDSII-. - A0.122 ir • -m'H - '� '�I —- I—31'DOYPPS YARD 1rfl• // I ,�\ v?, o (6.G •VP. r Hr,.• ♦. ,LUD. MI>4'D 11$ � -O .I I I�ad•Xm w ' I— � `CJ �.(,fl S'�^r./ , , •- �®.. • 1^ n. .- • LUD. NIXED u-se1{,-/ O.O° D'D1nrEe YARD 1 .°h♦ L Aiv, ., rppf0 I�- IDJ[®1. • • �. ' •A�.ii' + ..' 1I 04 . '- MP MIFFED YARD ' / ly'� '` I/i ..W.AREA � •'�'*•- L-- _ i hM K F • LO°' , .+I.11111 LUn —LAND 115E DESIGNATION •V ` , _ iTL MAR —]ODIUM DENIM'RESIDENTIAL • .S ✓. ' i . .I . ... . ,... � 4 1 O �� LIIR —LOW DENIM'RESIDENTIAL AG —ZONING-ACNCUL7T/RL \ T TAN ^, +�aMi • �. CS —ZONING-COMMT NIT•SERi7Q �•• ar=r 1 \\\ `.� i.' yle'R O V111ii I w{��,• P.= —ZONING-N.AMd9 UNIT DEFELOIME.YT i.� \`\� <Ytr. P 7 -� , W �•1-��' ' V • - , I �ctll 11. SPY —ZONING-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1 t • ,l !0� 1; IL, {1♦' • 1/ , r ifir Iri'..- +•l WI —ZONING-MULTI FAMILY RESIDENT•L D \\\\\� p%- . \ r .�1P p o o r ir ��'a-il ' _ a —ZONING-OFFICE 1 . sal `. Yp/� ' CF —ZONING-GENERAL oW.AN .. d& J� ,x ..t a ACRESTO EICF-ED AIM TM ENTIRE SE FYTIIRE NON-RRFSmFMW. Lti ir 11.1011 PUD.AND MULL NOT LTCZED 1B D.U/AC s :: w• W ;farmer ° , I • o �� Nil B . '�/�'� o B ACCLSAT7 L YD Sf.RILL 9E RLTIIUCIKD TO ONE • • 'I sr \. 1\��} .., II ( 1 EVE.EMERGENCY LOCATION FOR ESS FOR Et AND R ONE I� „ -1 715.1 ACCESS CM ACCESS FOR D[OIAND CS USES Q'B. 11 ONCE A SFEGPIC USER 15 IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL III• ONCE A SPECIFIC IIC USER O IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL AEC HEATHS CITY COUNCIL RESERVES STIR OPTION TO REQUIRE TIN(TRY MTUN[1.RESERVES TIM OPTION Ti REQUIRE A PARCiG.A 3123 A('RI'S A.Tar SETBACK PRIM ISIS NODS)PROPERTY FINE AT LE v.16/11 FMN11 IIIY AT TIIII UM RAH ItA(111 IMAM nut SITE PION MOP.MOP.*H ITN r)ur1MEr unR OF MI AND OUR II.IT Cl uyvullTm _.—__ PARLIIL E 77.76 I ACRES 03 AS A SCHOOL OWNER/AMII(ANI PLANNER/ENGINEER ONCE A SPD(IFIC IIC 77 IS IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL IIC Mt FORCER.C 67ES S ACRES CITY COUNCIL RESERVES DIE OPTION TO REQUIRE A JOP• INII RN:\t I111ADN'.\\"S AHD. (-lIN('FPRIAI.IN TT ITR0Y-RETERM CARTER•BURGESS INC PARc•EL D M.9♦I ACRES SETMCE AT THE ME PION STAGE FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY NA AIRY :\NIT 1S111 111+. OI•1INED Al 111E 11M1: EEAI RROMI PARKWAY SUITE DIAIIMIOI OR __- —._-.--- LINE O/1IU AND MI IR D U DE i'EL.OfA'D AS A xt/OOL AA-ANNEX DSIS DER! MITRE IL III - IN'Iglu III IITI XIIN:\1II,N AEI, SSI7!PLAN I (9T1!L93aS �D1I1 GROSS STIL AREA AM.B2 ACRES COMMFXI WFS(Cl C2 AND CJMOYBNED MILL NUT EXCEEDAPPRI IVAI. MG WO L LU UAW An•ua•un 30; DIE OF RAND ARE!POR PARCEL MB OR PARCEL INC TRACT NO. III !ANTI 90947 NON—RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. ZONING REQUEST CONCEPT PLAN C111 OP II()11AKE.TARRANF(YIUNIY.TEXAS FO y CARTER A IIl1ROliSY,INC. R 200.E2 ACRE PROPOSED PI ANNPD uurr DEVRIDPMRPIT • -J„ ' ✓ nnl , 'P 1',,,.4'7,f�xRAn.i k. .1r s:.., u.,.I...1.., _! L.,,,•.. ,w. 0'. J{+ 6+,.,a ,1 d �✓,A ,,y. r . ? ,(,,.ca,., (4� C�i,ld+A / �!1 A 11: 1 t ��M.x Y�� ;h � Y',i, (s � tt; r T�' � ,}�. 0I � �' " � ,A,, � �� ktA . � �6\;�, 1p� y � r.✓ I .i{, y; .v; ti✓r � f . :r � i w r� ,r .? , +11A A. tr s )l J0 ,fir 4 11A' 1 5, . i c.: i � ( 1tt a L4 •D. . , S . ..e, „ 8 IlIP NI,II ,,, pI1e , xTaw , M ,', ,I ;�.,IE,; ,{ YI • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS • 0 Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities. The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below: STORM DRAINAGE Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast- southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways. WATER DISTRIBUTION An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and S.H. 114. A system of 12" watermains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM SThe southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the existing lift station on Carroll Avenue. Eventually, the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station. Currently, the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station. This lift station is planned for summer 1997. As a temporary measure until a force main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood, the Quail Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. A more desirable scenario would be to direct flow from the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street. S June 9, 199- 96204401.R03 B-1 7E 78 TRAFFIC STUDY • The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified. This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. LAND USES The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan. STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROVEMENTS TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the • construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis. PERIMETER STREETS State Highway 114 will be the primary access into Tract III. Internal circulation patterns will orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Kimball Avenue will be a secondary access route. East Highland will only provide one full access for residential uses or an emergency crash-gate for uses other than residential. • THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the update of this Master Plan. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) at the development plan stage of process. At that stage of development, the proposed users will be known and an accurate analysis of all traffic impacts can be performed. • June 9'1997 96204401.R03 B-2 7F—79 RUNOFF STATEMENT Timarron Commercial will detain 100% of the increase in runoff generated by future development of these tracts. All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project on drainage. • • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 B_3 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-222 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 200.822 ACRES SITUATED IN THE RICHARD EADS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 481, TRACTS 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B1A, AND 2C1, AND IN THE THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1049,TRACTS 2A,2B,2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, AND 5D, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A MIXED USE BUSINESS PARK TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING USES: "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, "0-2" OFFICE DISTRICT, "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL • COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT AND ANCILLARY RESIDENTIAL USES (NOT EXCEEDING 20.08 ACRES) FROM THE "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, "SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND "SF-20" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter • adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, L:\TYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD ^ ✓�( Pagel ` WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; 0 adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD Page 2 411 a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts ✓" of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 200.822 acre tract of land situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, Tracts 1, 1A1, 1E, 2, 2A, 2B, 2B 1 A, and 2C1, and in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049,Tracts 2A, 2B,2B1, 3, 3A, 3C, 5, 5C, and 5D, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial to "NR- PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business • Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses(not exceeding 20.08 acres) from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District, "SF-30" Single Family Residential District and "SF-20" Single Family Residential District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD Page 3 16'83 I L s of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. • MAYOR L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-222.PUD r Page 4 , ;qv r 11 li 1 , , 1 i w i '1 i I 1! 1,1: ' . ii i 11 , 111 I'Il I / t!,,,lip 4 11) l • • I fi c� �� i �� : e ti •� • • , elk 411 It?' 4,......:,.. „0„.....0„..„ . ... , .1,..1.4.1..„, . : r ..., ,, • • h • 0 �•��•iiP• • d Z • ° 2 4 �! a 3 a .4'';',...-5.-./ ' '!-IN 11 i • •i: P Ait..!`" Nikt: !Ncl i i i),,, ipk. - ft. ...VP': ot 111Wk $0°-‘s ''.---.'111 111 -r< S, • "i7.,,-.Z........,_,: Or.R g a. eht-4...... ..._ ill ^,--°.0 ,,,,•, "\V40 ,z, ,., .k alikb pzi.!- 'cP IN gl cl...._• il iia. N • • ,•e- • st • •• Ilzb qg 1 Aft r ,,. rwi,- eo, ' o \\1:44;lil.. .."2:-'i,!: ',\',;:‘7)! \ .:..'41f1,!!,1 ' ‘ ‘``Y# kt \ -,,, ,,,,,,i,,,-,-‘,„,,, ..,, \ ,,, , \ . \ , ,„, , ‘‘.- e \ , ,,, ....., \, :------.. , \ ki,. , „ ,, ..,... ____ ,,,__: .....,,,„ .. __ ,k, irivm...- :vi------- ‘"------- N!,:.: , \ .. ... \ .:.,,,,,,,....:.',:,',..,,, ,„ ,‘ „ ,.,,.,,„.,,...,...... ___.... lilt a"'\111 *;Ikilliki - \x, „,t ' t) -- r �� y4 TIMARRON COMMERCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS TRACT III DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • PERMITTED USES • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE • CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBITS • 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION • BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN • CONCEPT PLAN 0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS • TRAFFIC STUDY • RUNOFF STATEMENT NO( gt 4‘49� June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 y ' • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES Timarron Land Corporation is requesting a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract III in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park" development allowing a variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure compatibility of land uses through creative planning. The Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning request will divide Tract III into four (4) separate parcels and will allow the following land use categories for each: PARCEL A • Residential* • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) PARCEL B • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • 02 - Office District (Sec. 19) • CI -Neighborhood Commercial District(Sec. 20) • C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21) • C3 - General Commercial District (Sec. 22) • B l - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) PARCEL C • CS - Community Service District (Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District (Sec. 18) • 02 - Office District (Sec. 19) • C 1 - Neighborhood Commercial District (Sec. 20) • C2 - Local Retail Commercial District (Sec. 21) • B 1 - Business Service Park District (Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District (Sec. 28) IP June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-I • PARCEL D • Residential* • CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 -Office District(Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) * The Non-Residential PUD shall allow ancillary residential uses, limited to the zoning classifications RE, SF 1 A, SF30 and SF20 up to 10%of the land in the NRPUD (20.08 acres). The permitted accessory uses, specific use permits, special exception uses and development regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SF 1 A, SF30, and SF20 zoning districts set forth in Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • `r June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-2 r r PERMITTED USES It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the zoning categories identified in this document(as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480) and shall specifically include those uses described as: • "Permitted Uses" • "Accessory Uses" • "Specific Use Permits" • "Special Exception Uses" • Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not been defined by current technology shall be subject to approval criteria established in Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 44.4, as amended. LAND USES There are exceptions to the permitted uses. Those uses identified with a double asterisk (**) shall require a Specific Use Permit(SUP). Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract III. RESIDENTIAL I. Permitted Uses 1. RE - Single Family Residential Estate . 2. SF1A- Single Family Residential 3. SF-20 - Single Family Residential 4. SF-30 - Single Family Residential June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-3 CS- COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses - BY SUP ONLY 1. (DELETED) ** 2. Higher education institutions ** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers, and similar cultural facilities ** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs (No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges) 5. (DELETED) ** 6. Public safety facilities ** 7. Religious institutions ** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-4 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses A. Office Uses 1. Accounting and tax preparation 2. Adjustment and collection services 3. Advertising agencies 4. Architecture 5. Banking 6. Bill paying services 7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only) 8. Business holding and investment services 9. Chamber of Commerce 10. Chiropractors 11. Computer services 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting 13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted) 14. Dentists 15. Duplication and mailing services 16. Employment services • 17. Engineering 18. Finance 19. Interior design 20. Land surveying 21. Law 22. Management consultants 23. Optometrists 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature 25. Physicians 26. Podiatrists 27. Psychiatrists 28. Psychologists 29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios 30. Real estate and insurance 31. Savings and Loan 32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices 33. Stenographic services 34. Title companies 35. Travel bureaus or services 36. Utility offices • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only • B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks ** 2. Recreation and open space ** 3. Libraries ** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) ** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-6 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities AP ip June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT II. Permitted Uses A. Commercial Uses 1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature 2. Bakeries 3. Barber and beauty shops 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats ** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores 8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or"take-out"food establishments 9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City hall,fire and police stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations). June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-8 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District ** 3. Cleaning,dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias • 4. Antique shops 5. Retail sail bakeries 6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops 7. Blueprinting or photostating 8. Book or stationery stores 9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers 10. Christmas tree sales 11. Cigar or tobacco stores ** 12. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats 13. Confectionery stores 14. Custom dress making or millinery shops 15. Dancing schools 16. Day nurseries 17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations 18. Dog and cat hospitals (excluding large animal clinics) 19. Drug stores 20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed eight thousand(8,000) square feet ** 21. Duplicating service,printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset printing ** 22. Filling stations or service stations, operating with/without a convenience store 23. Financial institutions 24. Florist or gift shops ** 25. Frozen food lockers 26. Grocery stores and meat markets 27. Health service facilities 28. Jewelry stores 29. Leather and leather good shops 30. Optical goods 31. Photographs,portrait or camera shop and photo finishing 32. Radio and television sales and servicing 33. Restaurants,tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and"take-out" food restaurants 34. Shop repair services 35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair 36. Tailor ** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales 38. Variety stores June 9,1997 96204401.R03 DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1110 I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District ** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas 3. Coin and stamp shops ** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys 5. Commercial art galleries ** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 7. Department stores 8. Dry goods and notion stores 9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 10. Hardware, paint, and wallpaper stores 11. Hat shops 12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums 13. Hobby shops 14. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances 15. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 16. (DELETED) 17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers (excluding cemeteries, crematories and mausoleums) 18. Music or record shops 19.Nursery buildings 20. Pet shops 21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies 22. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs 24. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work 25. Skating rinks, ice and roller ** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use permit(excluding sexually oriented businesses) 27. Toy stores ** 28. Upholstery shops - furniture 29. Variety stores June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-10 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only B-I BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses * A. Office and Commercial Uses 1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District 2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations ** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly 4. Banks 5. Barber and beauty shops 6. Book and stationery stores ** 7. Computer manufacture and research 7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex 8. (DELETED) ** 9. Electronic manufacture 10. Funeral homes (excluding cemeteries, crematories, and mausoleums) ** 11. Lithograph, engraving,printing and publishing ** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment ** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments 14. Medical clinics ** 15. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies ** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing 17. Private schools 18. Professional/business schools 19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex 20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure ** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing 22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters) ** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly 24. Studios for training in fine arts B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City Hall, policy and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) * Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-1 1 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0 "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses ** 1. Hotels and motels ** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned ** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned ** 4. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-12 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to all new or amended ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following exceptions: BUILDING SETBACKS Setbacks for Tract III land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across the street from residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan, the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where it is adjacent to residential areas. Setback Adjacent to Residential RES 35'* CS 100' Min.* 01 100' Min.* 02 100' Min. C 1 100' Min. C2 100' Min. C3 100' Min. B 1 100' Min.* HC 100' Min ** * Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from the north porperty line at the site plan stage of approval. ** Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council resreves the option to require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-13 BUILDING HEIGHTS Maximum building heights for Tract III land uses shall be in accordance with the following table. Maximum Building Height RES 35' 2.5 Stories CS 35' 2.5 Stories 01 45' 2.5 Stories 02 90'* 6 Stories Cl 45' 2.5 Stories C2 45' 2.5 Stories C3 45' 3 Stories HC 90'* 6 Stories B 1 45' 2.5 Stories * The northwest area of Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a maximum of four(4) stories or sixty (60)feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by S.U.P. only. IP June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-14 BUFFER YARDS Perimeter buffer yards for Tract III shall comply with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table: Adjacent to E. Highland,N. Kimball and North Property Adjacent to Line of Parcel III D Residential* Other RES 50' 25' 25' CS 50' 35' 25' 01 50' 35' 25' 02 N/A 35' 25' Cl N/A 35' 25' C2 N/A 35' 25' C3 N/A 35' 25' B 1 50' 35' 25' HC N/A 35' 25' *Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street from Tract III. Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard type. June 9, 1997 ' 96204401.R03 DR-15 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION 0 ADJACENT TO N. KIMBALL AVENUE, E. HIGHLAND STREET AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL IIID. (IF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF PARCEL 1310 IS RESIDENTIAL AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW) f 50' BUFFER YARD L 0AP4i dk..... , sCZ 0: A. cO • a', i„,. . ,„,,,, 1171e7.- iii 110, a. -\ 0 :`` ` ' PARKING , • -�'."`'� s-sm.,� Nr 3'-8'HT. _ s jl MEANDERING ��' _ BERM .__,J. 1 (AVG. 5'HT.) 3 IP . JUNE 9, 1997 96204401.111 LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping will be provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2)to four(4) plus 2% for every story from five (5) to six (6). OPEN SPACE The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas. A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be performed at the development plan stage of the approval process. There will be no impervious coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of pedestrian trails. Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master design guidelines that respond to tree preservation, at the development plan stage of the zoning process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake, as those requirements are developed. The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed buffer yards and open space for Tract III. • June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 D R-16 7'�• ,. , r '7f y i m f/ .` `_yw�.w. �, -" y4"'. --74 7 y i-,;"'. , - i 'l4 _ a 7w "� �, ' f L.•,v 0'µy(., S ih8�0• ..1 ' r r rl, •AtrT ; ip ii.• .1 t ``�`~\ y 1`I iIY a *'r = ;��: .'/, �:f 1} 1t J4.5�pff of J ; l • T4J 1' . �J` a^st``".•: 1; � a j .e1% 7'J�' rc 1�}yj} ...' / II /1,' , - \i• 11 01'1 .k' vams.,r� `3yi f ' 3 71 '11ts r�- r,- �,'.... .+� ~ _ ti is kbz ..n .y./ r 1 .;.. _i...i+9' i r; l`T i{e�e ►a /l�.. 7J , . r am" i• f -,lxf w - . f � � ,A.,, ..::4ii n't -,r 6_ C ' FRAD /OPEN' � _ i {-i; u t r 1r 25.BUFEYR I J :` `l/ 1,`/J`BY ORB DOR OYERLA 1' 1 , -; 11} •.`u� , r i I i ` •,t • .' ! K . - E i 1 ,t,�,.200 407 CigO 1 ` a k, 1 ,.�-®/ ,+- >.., y rc�.str.T- ,7 7`• y VA*, *, '10� r S r r ; 1• •+ , a eilj5,.. p` f 4 l a y,r r a j ; ,. �� .• r/ r,,Q r 4 r G, , iti. \ S f; ,a ,r s,aI rt. 4 ,11 i •'ss'N' ' ' • —. ti \ 1 i -",.'s ,r'",',..4 r. ;yfj,./ - i , ,...,:...- ; .. - '� �� 'v� 1� Cq--:.'�.1,k. ':1r' / t � 2+ .i J"� i ill lr!f,11.1 t J t- 'Y•.�.::::7._ i, .•,, 1 1p `-i t � '`\ '�� /jr:J1liijj rT y�r " , `_�'' �s` I�1+ t I /Z4_ :,,y`'�' ' r ,/1t `• ✓ ,.r��r•f'0/�!,r!%' { r r # �"' , �r'� 1 7 f,1 i Yp-S-7' ` \\ l.ko,.I - ( •• y.\•.--....,.• i`,i ;#�f ice , f ,` '. 7/ 5';y.%% ir":'j ,"i'• ,• . "; 0 )l ga d K..+l 1- \: -- !;2Y i y :" )/ E° 'i " 1 1 11 J f -,.t \ NI y r At1� /1 �• + ,'1/ • J ., ��1 •I j v� � -� �, -7„ 1 i;�•J C: ' / ', r `` `, 3`11 //r- / ` _.4 r, 'fir `> ifi/i / • = aNl ) 1 k (.k, \ 1 ,ki,:.7i.,Z,%,., ;:i.i,:•,,,,,;,1 f .-•?1, 4i �, 11 ( � ,} r)`� `� .: �;:. LEGEND • t•t ! 1, _ ,, r 1; ) �,,�•$ r* — PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CORRIDOR \' _C `fir (�, j�,�`,(7� �'% t •� \` OVERLAY REGULATIONS , tJ )�r ,.?'V,r,,,..„,), ,r//)1 )((t,'. ( SV-"I / �---�*�*'.,•, — AREAS TO BE PRESERVED AS Pc i , II �1� � ••4•� BUFFER YARDS OR OPEN SPACE -''-Q �' • , • 1 j _ ' i .%: — PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE ier "*7 Y 1/f1!.`. )1 1 '�1';r LAND USE PLAN AS LOW—MEDIUM n o '/.•r 1.1; ?i l LI !(u / \ i-/ RESIDENTIAL r% '<; '{ I' ( r " fc. J"• 11:— i — — — POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE �� -:_= �, I -„{jjj��f ,` '%'JJ//-/," -l"_ UNITED STATES \ ,,,/ ///A 1 ? . L ., • (.,,,(( , .., ..... ,..... ......, , . ...... ((( TRACT III JUNE 9,1997 ZD AND OPEN SPACE PLAN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS CARTER & BURGESS,INC. FOR 200.822 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IT I 11/I A RR C A L CONCEPT PLAN This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in sections 30 and 41 (as amended by Ordinance No. 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is seeking. TRACT III The following table demonstrates land uses categories permitted for each parcel within Tract III. The attached exhibit"Concept Plan"further illustrates the general location of each parcel. PARCEL Area LAND USE CATEGORIES A 32.23 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, BI B 77.76 ± AC CS, 01, 02, CI, C2, C3, B1, HC c' 63.85 ± AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2, B1, HC D 26.98 t AC Residential, CS, 01, B1 SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS • Ancillary residential uses RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 20.08 acres for the entire Tract III Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac. • Access to East Highland Street will be restricted to one full access location for residential uses or one emergency "crash-gate" for CS, 01 and B 1 uses. • Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIIA and IIID,the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from the north property line at the site plan stage of approval. • Once a specific HC user is identified for Parcel IIIC, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback at the site plan stage, from the south property line of TRI and TRIB (of the T. Mahan Survey A-1049) if it is developed as a school. • Commercial uses(C1, C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50%of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIB or 50% of the gross parcel area for Parcel IIIC. June 9, 1997 -i 96204401.R03 DR-17 • The northwest area ofL Parcel IIIC (as identified on the Concept Plan) shall be restricted to a miximum of four(4) stories or sixty(60) feet. The fifth and sixth story shall be permitted by S.U.P. only. • There will be no impervious coverage permitted in the flood plain with the exception of pedestrian trails. • The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 as amended. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping area will be provided in the amount of 1%of the lot area for every story from two(2)to four(4)plus 2% for every story from five (5)to six(6). QUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and quality at the development plan stage for Tract III. The design guidelines will be available for review at the time of development plan submittal. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 DR-18 111 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities. The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below: STORM DRAINAGE Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast- southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways. WATER DISTRIBUTION An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and S.H. 114. A system of 12" watermains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM The southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the existing lift station on Carroll Avenue. Eventually,the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station. Currently, the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station. This lift station is planned for summer 1997. As a temporary measure until a force main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood, the Quail Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. A more desirable scenario would be to direct flow from the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 B-1 TRAFFIC STUDY The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified. This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. LAND USES The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan. STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROVEMENTS ,40) TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis. PERIMETER STREETS State Highway 114 will be the primary access into Tract III. Internal circulation patterns will orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Kimball Avenue will be a secondary access route. East Highland will only provide one full access for residential uses or an emergency 'crash-gate for uses other than residential. THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the update of this Master Plan. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)at the development plan stage of process. At that stage of development,the proposed users will be known and an accurate analysis of all traffic impacts can be performed. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 B-2 RUNOFF STATEMENT Timarron Commercial will detain 100% of the increase in runoff generated by future development of these tracts. All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project on drainage. June 9, 1997 96204401.R03 B-3 r City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-056 PROJECT: Development Plan - Timarron Addition, Village J STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Development Plan of Timarron Addition, Village J on property legally described as approximately 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract " LOCATION: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra - Timarron, L.P. • CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved(4-0-1) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Development Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Development Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated June 13, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-056SP.W PD • . . ... '''. ' • •-• 3 5i L .--•, 1 _ „ . . u40-.5 7` ,itt. ... : I's, • ! ---, ---1.-:-. i -- l'.......E0 . i s " '0 • ; IC ille71.4 3f I 3r1 302A,341 IT 104 3C i --. - • BS a-t.=1;Fr.•...4-4 i 4a I.r_..t A e A I_.. IC .-..--....--• •--,. ..., SC 3A 3AI 3C 30 V -2 001 3C2 PA S:S01 Y SE 50 s. 7.66 4G 40 ‘ti H ge• L ..4.$50,1 I"3 k 5:.8.?Ac 3.56 At Ac '0 6 Ac ...' 1% Ac .57 A' s I ri 91 . k ' 1‘ 1- I.1 \) 'CID XI C IS Asf .. L... - -I 3:4 ....,-.1.711 H r` 2211 A.0 i ; 30 302 •..1 .- "1.---- 5 At ) I 'IN' s Ct55 SO1 .". I ..../ •• 1 c...--....-.j•I.2...-- I'I•...•...4 C OA . a ... .,t.,.v. , Y E.61.ZA Zi''2AID• :,;' eq14. AINV / 2 . - - 423. u1 41 , • V' s 1 I I 31 ,..1.1..• , I • • •'. . .*.,'. 30 51p,. ,,,..cc...,i•, gil, . •• ! 1 ‘......S.• .1d/ai IMAM -14 ; , f VI jiattpi 21 Acs • ) 4E1 ft,.. ..r...,_, ir 4x [ IlL ICI (33 .-7 1....• 4 48 ,1t1011. 4 Ac 31 I I P.:C., 25 znA rn .._ 5UV4*c. r L)) t : , • ...92_ •:e • Y M - 7.1 , ...,_ OBEDI fil W ... 'NIGHT ..., .,..ii.s.s.: rrrrit...5. 5.Rst•-r. A-41411A . I ""•'••••• .i 50.71 Ac ' 20 k •0'. .. ,--. ... ... 2t 2c I 2C2Av. 2:-.;.4-'i .. -,., s.., OtiLL ILL'14 Kii- r • '' i Ii_ii,_?-....,,..„,„1._,. .44tXS,••••111 t"''' - tInge. g I 1pilz:21_,iicallei rx. .1.. 4, , % .."--.."'" / '------, - . ‘r rut Af: IMAir i i • 1 ... ...... . ,0 1);. 4 Ac 4 Ac .....• •''.:- , .-.il , ! I ! V. V. V ..• ..i-i-4-4-• 1-; IHAPA aulami-RMistc.6.1i, • ';-.- • ., • .11..i.r..1. . SAW.' 44•:•.141 .T. . L. .- v: . ••,,L. 11 a a Iv. 'L • • ., .' 1 ... 4C -44x1?1-","'"' i 1 ! ! 1 i " -i- t. 49s. ',....X:2 ••••1" 1 .., .ir.k..ir •--"..... ' ' i i i i I) ./L I k:1 .., .. • i ' • .\‘...,:,7‹:,:i -.1- @ 1 ! • ''• 03 ....,...4,...o, ._. I 45C - . iii ,L.:, G',•°'..- ._i- za.-..:,..* 1 / 10 ' ...., kl:0 1 • - .- ----; -.4- - /ILI 7_ . „ , .. . • . 4A • • I I I ,i 43,, Figi ‘,1'-i-•-..''.. . I sc, , • .":7-- 0` .i.ai. .., 4 At . 1111" 1', I • i •- • . i .° • .. . . 1 , UN .., - .... 1\A • •: .1.15"akiriellil 0, Weir . 1 N,,• !/ .....r 6.I. , It.,W.:'. . ". .1 .......1.40 ''... .. . • i i iF. ,i •Grtirli.! .17.1,.....•,....S .4•., .4.• 1 i a .42..."r614114144,41pt."11111.1eite9411. "aIII.4'.4 ganIMMIIC,..". I 7,716c :1 1 1 Ark" ,g...... i J. '' •••••••-,.•/-64Z1:' ‘,-.. ..Lil.• . . .. • ..e .. 1•att..44 Tama° ..... .,.. ! .4 • '4*. IA te g A *-1C,0*---- i. 5,•:.'i • 1-1/10. • " ' '‘. Vglifig.4101 ,, Otv-• 1 F,.,...:. . ,... • • •• • • .,,.,,,, . • !PIM/ a . L.- -,--- ---\r--- ..1 -.-7 .. - • , • `1.. _ ----- :,,, AINIMMUMHIE - I - I 1,. fi I.,- ... ... .,•^. W :::,,,•••-**". ea *-1-.-k- i 1 x....: • 54. Mnh7-r----:---7. Rims IA 1 It ,.; ii . iii11111 , I i . grpi•.,..f...... !....7.• .."3".T•704 * . •/* I s . * ........4‘s*ATINNirTC -Pill • - gi .1 ! -4-1-• .:i. . . -'1. v•-•!-- --4 i 1 I Lit.A0. N)pook-i ' i i i i • ' V11111 -- li . 2 . .1.40R 1 --,-., -,4".•-• i ' I i I • .• '''.'t ., , ' 'fr- -.-_•. --..--...--t- IT‘rt.4-1, -,.• -Tteliza-÷.• ; 1-. :,. 2A3 ' ; -'' •.., s'-‘.'"'''llikliiv......170' .,a, ..,... . . 1 ! 3. i -----mC Zee.- . i -. ,. MEMO -- •., .--- •e- i ., •-• ,1 a...-(_.ii _. -. /-- . . . -• .-i,,, .-i.-'N.A ., %.,..•..-<. .,. ., _;. .. / ,...., -.:- \T.,-,,_ m...1 .- ,.\---1 - -17.?-4-• l''-i.: - . ,-.....,;- g -• • '' -. , , .-, • --,„,....%_.- .1 - ..14 ••••.- '•••,.. • ; ' . • ',' 4, Ord i . ;• •4,• . --I• ,:./., • -- •'- ,"' -r• ._ 1.- * -•: t-5- ...‘ , ....t..- *%.," .: T 4. ,.I-....I . -ti.1.Z •'•;.':-` ••••• • I i,,A„ ,tty:- •- •III-. -!.:1 ..."-i --- •-V-"- -.1--(?•••• g •i ••'4'' U ,••••••;:4'4 • • 4• -4-•-j-, (.......... ..- Ili:, ;...?i..,v: It • t•- .-1 . •.•. -- ---t I i k 4., • *;, *! . "...... . i ..•X•4;.. .'4"...."4443Pum 7•'''' k ,... ,,,t.41sminig"a•q•-.•X. ;,:. ,- 5.,; •, .......1......"" •'• r. • TRO!E , -, st-a -Y..Uz.r. • -::-.W...... ' ' 1 " ., ! 1 1 a-- ..., -.i.:5-i,,-,- .40) r-•- •• , ‘,.. , i i 1 ' i i .-k: ,:: 's. .3 • . • 0404i“ I-. orp- -----. ...--- 7,.-• . ils-ri• " ,-.'. ‘..h.'' '•W 4 • : Ns . n t ,,, i 1.• ,,.i.--.'f.4 . y•:: ...A.:: • . 1..L. WAEOLIG1 - ,.n..tyli;:r. T •• • . -..• .. • . -.1-•,',, •-"••- ---fi • C->4,•• -/-7--, : 4' ___ .. . •- ,rf,,,14.--i 7 •-. p ' `'or ., . ; ' ,... ••-':-VP,' . - 7 : -=.-7---• • tfr C) . . .e......... .....y..,,r- l !g. ,.. . ; • .44.., - 1'. 4. ea.;17',. •,,,.. I q..._$1-. .4-• lizi •-•I---;4 . ., •• . , , . 6... k rh ,i,1:::,. • .7..:.-.A.7....-..iTs-1 *II... ',c,,!•.,. . 4417-. .7,4‘. 1•s<Isei. . \s‘ , . -.,. I V j '•-•%.. / N. .\) „ ..,-, • • •411.k•C 4.....-.: • \‘'t Tv 11 •• ..t," . ..,.. , ....../e• .4 e APT. -. • ' IG -.•. • I'V -:.: ..... . , %.! / .1 . ' ), •' I . ......,,,--,. ...,G.7.:, _.. is.i•, t..... cii. . 6-L.g.:;--- :-.•?....;:,. • .- -. i . P • f ., '7'" i • ._. . ...._ , , • .. ...z.*ec.• ,..--.,- . 4...-...--...--", A , c:t. .....,- .- • . . r-5-K7. i IQ. . i .I. • - '-'74. 4,11414- ,.. .- ....-- .--.!,0••• 7 16 AC • ..::”..., .4‘ •'•:4-' • ••? •' pre. ..,,- •,...... -„: , .,• ..-) 1 28 , ,...\/ .4- • I IA I : i :•..' 1 i ! .:._::, '31' l, \ 3.1 • ! A ! i ONR c ri , r_ Nill- .....• -, •••:,um>. ' tsioLly 1 i •IA _. 1. ..-.:-.„....1 ..„.,.........„ Rim ?; ', i 1 ..••••••t;31:-.3 - t 304 , I ,1-.,., W.M. On,\i ENP6H7- ....,1__. L t---- ------ -r---'1-...\\,.-r,' - TRACT MAP • - -, • 1 City of Southiake S Timarron „ „Village J I I -„,„.____,--,_ _ , - __ N • . ' 161111 I\ . 1 - .. I )* / 010111111101111M it,• 1IIII lel v7410, 'Q, \i6 A ', . 40 - V t Elf" a f* 111 Ai \I '' • ti '---'111 ,Ci\,„;\........,' HN ' 4Ail , ... \ ;- , V. 0 . a . . Ilk . 4 e __ . „ ,..„. ,• , ,, • A k SDISCLAIMER Legend , - This data hat been coepged for The l Timarron Village "J" pahcr this Information.Ewy Mort to Imre w:gi:aor L N O Scale nmplied a;%s 200' Buffer Area of said data. 1 F- , Parcels Within 200' Buffer Public Works - GIS • • Timarron Village J Adjacent Land Owners and Zoning 29-May-97 # PIDN Owner Name 01 42168C 24 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 02 42168C 24 4 NEWPORT CLASSIC HOME 03 42168C 24 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 04 A1037 2A01 20 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 05 42168C 24 15 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 06 42168C 24 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 07 42164C 37 6 LEEPER, ROBERT 08 42164C 37 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 09 42164C 37 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 10 42164C 37 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 11 42164C 37 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 12 42164C 37 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 13 42164C 38 12 TIMARRON LAND CORP, • 14 42164C 38 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 15 42164C 38 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 16 42164C 38 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 17 42164C 38 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 18 42164C 38 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 19 42164C 38 6 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 20 42164C 38 7 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 21 42164C 38 11 D&D HOMES INC, 22 42164C 38 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 23 42164C 38 9 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 24 42164C 38 8 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 25 42164C 38 38 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 26 42164C 38 39 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 27 42164C 38 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 28 42164C 38 41 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 29 42164C 38 42 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 30 42164C 38 43 TIMARRON LAND CORP, • 1 ALL ZONING IS PUD NO. 1 SPIN ' 9 LAURA MIKLOSKO • . • 0 . February 21,1997 Comparison of Planned Unit Development Regulations Page 1 General Lot Size Requirements Yard Requirements Building Criteria T Total Gross Residential Acres I Min.Lot Avg.Lot Min. Min. Front Side Side Rear Minimum Maximum Maximum j` #of Acres Density %Open Size Size Width Depth Yard Yard Yard Yard Floor Building Lot Lots Space (Adjacent Area Height Coverage to$treef ' r r SF-20 N/A N/A Maximum of N/A 20,000 sq.ft. N/A 100' 125' 35' 35'unless 15' 40' 'A'-1,B00 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% 2.18 D.U./acre platted (35'cul-de- 'B'-1,500 sq.ft. 35'max. '/ otherwise sac) y(c SF-1A N/A N/A Maximum of N/A 43,560 sq.ft. N/A 100' 125' 40' 40'unless 20' 40' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 20% �\ 1.00 D.U./acre platted 35'max. otherwise P.U.D.REGULATIONS Coventry 101 103.76 1.0 D.U./acre 14 acres 20,000 sq.ft. N/A 100' 120' 35' 20' 15' 35' 2,700 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% 101 units 13% (43,560') (85'in cul- (230'on (40'on (20'on lots (100'on 35'max. (20-30K) (30,0002) de-sac) P'ville) >40,000 >30,000 P'ville) 20%>30K sq.ft.lot) sq.ft.) Lonesome Dove Estates 151 82.4 1.82 D.U./acre 7.976 12,350 sq.ft. N/A 95' 120' 25' 20' 10' 20' 60%are 2.5 stories 35 150 units acres (15%) (85'in cul- (135'on (45'on >2,300 sq.ft. 35'max. -Phase I 9.68% (26,650 sq.ft. de-sac) Burney, Carroll) 20%=2,100-2,200, -Phase II 79 47.86 78 uints on Carroll) L.Dove) 20%=2,201-2,300 72 34.54 72 units Monticello 109 129.92 0.82 D.U./acre 48.93 20,000 sq.ft. 27,100 sq.ft. 90' 125' 30'min. 20' 10' 20' 3,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories N/A 105 units acres (35'min. (25'reverse 35'max. -Phase I 39% 50%lots) frontage) -Phase II 56 46.59 55 units -Phase III 25 44.05 23 units 28 39.28 27 units Monticello Estates 124 71.77 1.69 D.U./acre 9.5 acres 12,000 sq.ft. 16,611 sq.ft. 100' 120' 25'min. 20' 10' 20' 1,800 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% (Timber Lake Dev.Regs.) 117 units 13.2% (mid.pt.) (mid.pt.) 35'max. -Phase I -Phase II 76 45.704 1.58/72 units 48 26.044 1.73/45 units Myers Meadow 272 141.94 1.9 D.U./acre Min.14.3 13,000 sq.ft. 15,000+sq. 85' 120' 30' 20' 10' 25' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 268 units acres (30,000 sq.ft. ft. (125' mid. >30'(50%) (25'reverse (40'adj. (2,500 sq.ft.adj. 35'max. 10% adj.to C.T.H.) pt.)' frontage) to C.T.H.) to C.T.H.) -Phase I 89 55.24 87 units -Phaso II 117 42.52 115 units -Phase Ill 98 44.18 96 unlls 3 . • • 7 Page 2 General Lot Size Requirements Yard Requirements Building Criteria Total Gross Residential Acres/ Min.Lot Avg.Lot Min. Min. Front Side Side Rear Minimum Maximum Maximum #of Acres Density %Open Size Size Width Depth Yard Yard Yard Yard Floor Building Lot Lots Space (Adjacent Area Height Coverage to Streeti r Stone Lakes 343 201.35 1.82 D.U./acre Not less 12,000 sq.ft. 16,944 sq.ft. 100' 120' 30' 20' 10' 20' 1,800 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% 337 units than 10% 35'max. -Phase I -Phase II 154 73.71 151 units -Phase Ill 60 47.71 58 units -Phase IV 81 37.09 80 units -Phase V 47 41.56 47 units 1 1.28 1 unit Timarron Phase I 167 102.48 161 units 16.13 12,000 sq.ft. N/A 85'(90%) 120' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% r. acres 50'-85' (35'for 10'as a 35'max. min.10% (10%) <50%) rule -The Highlands I 68 32.81 2.01/66 units 2.78/8.5% 100'@ Houses> -Bent Creek I 99 69.67 1.36/95 units 13.4/19.2% mid.pt. 20'apart Timarron Phase II 124 81.44 117 units 10.1 acres 12,000 sq.ft. N/A 85'(90%) 120' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% 50'-85' (35'for 10'as a 35'max. The Highlands II (10%) <50%) rule 9 33 16.81 1.90/32 units 0.78/4.6% 100'@ Houses> -Bent Creek II 58 41.85 1.31/55 units 7.18/17.2% mid.pt. 20'apart -Estates at Bent Creek 33 22.78 1.32/30 units 4.72/20.7% I Timarron Phase III° 240 300.82 1.92 D.UJacre 20.0/6.65% 201 107.33 1.8 D.U./acre 18/17% 193 units *•• . Glendover 56 38.86 1.36 D.U./acre 7.23 acres 15,000 sq.ft. 15,500 sq.ft. 85'(90%) 150' 25' 20' 5'(25%) 20' 2,600 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30% (Product Type A) 53 units 18.6% 50'-85' (35'for Houses> 35'max. (10%) <50%) 20'apart -Wyndsor Creek 87 40.74 2.06 D.U./acre 5.02 acres 11,250 sq.ft. 11,500 sq.ft. 85'(90%) 125' 25' 10' 5'(25%) 20' 2,400 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 30%(50%) (Product Type B) 84 units 2.06% 50'-85' (35'for Houses> 35'max. 35'%(50%) (10%) <50%) 20'apart -Brenwyck 1 58 27.63 2.03 D.UJacre 5.24 acres 10,500 sq.ft. 11,000 sq.ft. 75'(90%) 120' 20' 10' 5'(25%) 20' 2,200 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 45%(50%) (Product Type C) 56 units 19.0% 50'-75' (25'for Houses> 35'max. 35%(50%) (10%) <50%) 15'apart -Product TY�e D 34 10.4 3.26 D.UJacre 0.29 acres 6,000 sq.ft. 7,200 sq.ft. 50'(45%) 100' 15' 10' Zero lot 20' 2,000 sq.ft. 2.5 stories 50%(25%) (Revised by o( 2.8% >60'(55•%) line(10' 35'max. 40%(75%) ......* min.13A (75%),40' Villas) units) max.(25%) • TIMARRON VILLAGE "J" DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PR_QpUCT A agui auELOPMENT REC t IREMENJ Height: Thirty-five feet (35') maximum. No building structure shall exceed two and one-half(2 Yz ) stories. Depth of Front Yard: Twenty-five feet (25') minimum - no more than 50% of the lots will have front yards less than thirty-five feet (35'). Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20') feet minimum. Width of Side Yard: Five feet (5') minimum on no more than 25% of lots and ten feet (10') minimum on remaining 75% of lots. No house may be closer than twenty feet (20') to adjacent house. • Width of Side Yard adjacent to Street: Twenty (20') feet minimum. Lot Width: Eighty-five (85') foot minimum lot width on 90% of the tots: 10% of the lots may have lot widths at the front setback line that vary from fifty feet (50') to eighty-five feet (85'). Lot Depth: One hundred fifty (120') feet minimum. Lot Size: Fifteen thousand (15,000) S.F. minimum . Fifteen thousand, five hundred (15,500) S.F. average. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30% Minimum Floor Area: 2,600 S.F. 970002 CTM Page 1 of 2 4.0\ REC'D MAY 2 91997 • PRODUCT D REGJJLATION PROPOSED CRITERIA Height: Forty (40) foot maximum (up to 25% of the lots); thirty-five (35) foot maximum (up to 75% of the lots); no building or structure shall exceed two and one-half(2 % ) stones. Depth of Front Yard: Fifteen (15') feet minimum. Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20') feet minimum. Width of Side Yard: Zero lot line allowed with 10' minimum between units. Width of Side Yard Adjacent to Street Ten (10') feet minimum. Lot Width: No more than 45% of the total lots shall have a minimum lot width of fifty feet (50'), with the remaining lots to have a minimum lot width of sixty feet (60') or greater. • Lot Depth: One hundred (100') feet minimum. Lot Size: Six thousand (6,000) S.F. minimum Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% (up to 25% of the lots)' 40% (up to 75% of the lots). Minimum Floor Area: 2,000 S.F. Note: A private access and maintenance easement shall be provided adjacent to all lot lines intended as 'zero" lot lines. 970002.CTM Page 2 of 2 REC'D MAY 2 91997 City of Southlake, Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY 1111ase No.: ZA 97-056 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97 Project Name: Development Plan - Timarron Addition, Village "J" being 56.814 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Westerra Timarron, L.P. Carter& Burgess, Inc. 7605 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, TX 75247 Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447 Attn: Todd Jansen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. Place the City case number"ZA 97-056" in the lower right hand corner of the plan. 2. Show and label any adjacent traveled roadway widths (Eagle Bend, Villa Crossing). 411). Show and label any off-site existing easements. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: A. In the 14th call from the beginning, correct the block number for". . . the corner in the northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 11F of said Timarron Golf Course. . ." to '`. . . Lot 1, Block 1. . ." B. Correct the discrepancy for the bearing between the boundary call and the legal description for the first call from the beginning. 5. The following are needed with regard to adjacent properties: A. Label Lot 1, Block 1 of Timarron Golf Course to the west/northwest of the site also. B. Show and label the type & size of each adjacent easement on the Golf Course. Also, label the type, size & deed record of the 15' U.E. and 15' A.E. filed by separate instruments which cross the Golf Course and the site. Show and label any easements to be abandoned. C. Correct the lotting for the southernmost portion of Block 38, Crescent Royal Addition, • specifically Lot 43. Increase the font size of the lot and block numbers for the sake of legibility and label Common Green 44. Show and label the type and size of all existing easements on Crescent Royal which are adjacent to the site (D.E., U.E., and M.&A.E.). City of South lake,Texas * If the intention on Lot 38, Blk. 62 is for frontage to be on Street"A", then the lot line adjacent to Street "A" must be of a lesser width than the lot line adjacent to Eagle Bend. * Provide load and access width for the bridge/30' common access easement between Lots 15 & 16, Block 62 in compliance with Fire Department requirements. (Ord. 480, Sec. 4.2, "Frontage") For questions, contact Vicki Hess, Fire Safety Inspector, at (817) 481-5581, ext. 737. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Carter and Burgess, Todd Jansen Westerra-Timarron L.P., Steve Yetts L:\W P-FI LES\RE V\97\97056DP2.W PD • • � l ' IC1 0 0 410 . ............. „ „„[:',7,.;,, - , ; , , ; Eirvc.1.-,:z.i.:;:..,;.17,-...,:.:..,:z.:,....i.,.-r,I..., i.:-..-111.1.•-,is 4.11:4"••""—-.-.. \ - . ,,, '''4111''" S , '"t''',.., , .1,1:7,21:41i,.....2.,^...".z.I.:::.7./:-:.:.•:tr.:1-1;.•311. LI:411:4v 4.r.:::"—'.—— — „,:,- NDtro?"..°14.,,,,. ,, y,',*.', ,'..', s :• ....17,-A.F.,.,..1.-,.....3z..,...,..../.—, ..,It....,........... N 1 'i F if•' - Y n:,/..Yttki":::".V7.7".4...14.-'43.713Z'•••• •••'-'•'- ...„=.,..,.„.11...4,,..,,,,,r,..-— -,-•fl. . •, . /"'.• _ . r,, •-• •,;-•\. l'.../ ,!.;," ; l'''I IJ ,,....4...), .01.....„......j..--/ 127."'''14".1111.-'‘'‘....'.."''''''..‘"..''''" i..trrilt....-.9 4.71:7.''•'''''''"""-. 1.2;n1441,11•4.1.4,.'""'•" '''•". L44.,i..11-J t _,- ig _ ,„,,,,,r,1,7r,;?•,.., .4 .,, , , _ i..r.t.:::...i•pr,r.••.--.::::'•••••••••••--- ::::::::.21'.-al Lrca.:',:"*•-••••—---. Ta,,,,,,,46.,.,T .-...-"*!;„/-•#'--/ -:-Alt-ls•-:...PCI!f,OF OE.R.F.0 fr. .:.i ,..,\ i,, ',v,.::,'",'..- • ' !a.:v....o.w.r.ttr..-".••----- ' ' - • - ,...is--' /. '-'•: :t.-: i i..•:.-vir:..:xtr•r........-•-•-•----- i.r.v.•,:.,:.',17,1'.:iiiiir••----- '',..if kr•••r•---'..p_:,',';;;-i27- --.-j,' -;- RI LOCAT1001 WP , ' ' --..,co...•Berls ''.: 1 .- :,' , 'i. . - ' . ' izzr.t.Linr.r.w...•••••-•---••••••• __ '"'''''' "'•• ........,...... ,r , , ?.'!. itt.. 1 ..,•,..; ,,ii• \.' ..... . , :\ i LS,"1:1A,11/....1.7 • "ZZLT`''""":61:7.7'"7 27'' '' '"''".• ...., ...... „I ..... .... •••••• = :4.:ti 7,-,.?i,t(tit-,:-: •::;)' ::1-3:_,,,::•:.:•... V. ,,41 .)t‘4V, ::•..;;.„,„7:f7.°'F‘,..‘;,.:•,, )1 i .,.., . ,I, ` ,....,,,,,,..poz.-....”•••"----- .. . ..... ..... _ .. .. .. -.- RODUCT U4'71 s,..1-9 r-TAIr'"."'""-— ......... .. ..... ..... - " , i ':., .,,-., •'.. , 1,'\ "-ti'' • ''' '.1,`.-I ''''••,'-:.'.:;:-';; ,•LV- . - '• :".7:.114•27alf.:.-Fati,s7.4-r-7::: LRRISO 'U---'17:7-A' C2,0',' ...---L!A...,..:11',..,..-174'..:-.,,,174..-:;.:,.,•--.4, ....... .. ..._. — ,... .. - - CAR . Civtl: : ....--,' .i.' 1 ) 1.,'.-'.t'... ;'""_ RZ,'%. .:. ,.' ''.•''',„,‘;‘',,,,;:.,'0 s,--'•;•:--- ir.2.-..7.-11..z.:....•:..::-....-,-...r.-.:. CRS CARPED WON KO SO .... .ss .A. ee B STREIT Out. ass .ss •.•1•R Le UTILITY fASLIAR1 OC DiCal.“CASOALNI ......1 Ars s ... se... Amer •-• •R • • •L MALODOR LK me...A sa RIR.. Am.. .A. s. ... Ra , , , '‘. . ' i....mr:Aaris...1.--•.ir-•—-— ,/,' ,,,,,'",;!7?",,r1,,,-.--,,/-•:-1,-•,,'' '; ,s, ,' / ;•,,4..% ,4 i‘ _A, . - , ,. ,, __ _ , ,_ ..,,„...,,,..„.„„„..,......„.... ........ .. ....... _ ... . .. .. .. . .. r-r ,„, w..71".•to,c''' i ' / ' ,• H' -.--,k ','''Ili,,‹.i •'''' '' s - '' 1 • -ii - .-..t.::7'.•;,-',...L.:-.7..7.........___ .... ........- - .. ... _ .. __,_; ..-.7,"" -,,e- . .. ,, ..- •• - . : , ‘, ... . , ;,. . ',.,- __ ', -7.t:.•....r..-":7.7:.......____ ..... ........... ..... - .. .. . :, ,.. ..: . -, '' .-,-.- _ ;;p,•• ,, i, •:, I. . •.:-. I, .h...7„...:77.„'1,...,2',......:..,••••••••----- ..... ........... _. - .. - -7....,..:•,,,,,,,•...”•-4. --- ........ .......... ....... ... . . ..., 4,...,„...,:,,,,-....7.,••••••••_--....-..--,....-1 1(i: 1 :R ; , .4 $700,,, 1 t -..,-,I4 ',,, t ,...t.....,‘, 4 - t; 7:.4.7,V.f.Pe.... .....,..„... s.•.1..0.1 0/0 0.... ' StRit1040C ••••••c•••• CAR A.SLOE illS RR.. — •••••• --- ........................... ,i/ '6,•I•1‘, ..i',,.4 i')/I ,-. 'C) .„:.. ,""4e,... .".7 „ ' ,C,"\.;'•".,.: f ',',ViLf.:,•. .i.ss••,,,, ';•1 c- •;; ',.,) '(_)„;;. ; 1; , - " '- •' •; , ;'' ', - ' is --i. ', • ii''•; I,'j 1, '0;tia-r0 V..,.;,' : (7)' ,.s I tNIST.ZONW,.RISOOsTRL 1,(1.•10 OC:( ' t. ,• i! i ..'.', ,,,, :- ,srstese LA.DES.GRATe.IMO..Of.Tr AfSCirs,Al . '• N 1,' '* ' 1 \Ili\\''' ''' ',k4 ,....------- _ PRODUCT' , .• • . s.,oll“E.,••eums ALL RISOLATRA LOTS.COmee CALOR - : , ii-‘,:1„S , i ;• . . .__ , j LA q,, y A.MO-0E-AATS.I .C,,4 — -, t ca.A.SLIK 29•• _ W/ . ‘\-'- r i '' . Z. - 40 'I 'P,'' ' I , ... , ••• - ', ,:-' ' t • IWO.RO 4$0.0C'•-•; ,, 44,‘.. 1 / fj',\\ ' • )1''''; ''.-'- '57 r - '- ' 13 Z.se No...:we.mon at,our.. ..• .34151 ,.... La.us,...am,.(11..11,muST(11.... --- -_l'i:', ''•(-1- " 1 P ...."'"-- ---. -... , e ----"L'i 1 i i ,‘:• , '. • --,---- • Rr •• .., .--, 40110.41E0 304011LI OF DEVELOP4(411 4Z) DO caeloucece t....,..._ FALL rill Susae(A 4•11(--.) :,1_ .J-T-'.-, - ‘. '- '', ,t• --_-t..11:-.=;'. ,. "A"f/; d..;' r,'' -.. ,t'7,--'1-,\..'' ''-it',., J- .!. \X C-7..;--- .. • ..:.......\i K. „ ,' ' / ' .. ,.." . \' 7- - .(= ‘,!'" /1:-. :f..---- ___ 1 • :: , I REC1)JUN 1 0 1997 --, , ' ‘!-,/, _,', .. .'j --. _, -, .,..: , isst4r--- 0--------.__•-•'-::: • ; ') •:•::::- •- , . , _ii., .,„ : . .,...1 ni. , : _, ,, ....,. . 44\T/-.:,_,...,_. sT:...,...,,.' •-. --.::•--'-: ''- ' •-"••.--' •,74, ''': -- .1W'''7.,04.---.... .-1,'i • , ..., ; •\, ' •,- ' •_,,2,i,, -,,„',,-\ ‘.--1,711,-.1..: . ,,,-,\',-;.ri•---44.!`:.-...7,,i •-.. --• "_.,-,....,_:-...:\'•-• -1 r ,:;.-..:.:.::-.• i. '-:." ' '- ' • 2---.-.,- ipP.-- , --.F.::•,•,.: , • AM. :OS 71 1070] I() ' ''•'-Fs- , - e• ' in*wavy l••• f1:::.,'I..•l 1•.jr,• 0 , . uLkA.fAistr=,a„,„at ll1i1iot,,"t,c )0,.\•',..4> .'',',. :4,'-1•;-1,2 6.67n...'..'ss 4..:'1,....1.-:,,-'rg" . 021111..ri3..4‘.i...ii....\•..'•..•v...i:.z,".„a,.r.7..,.31......,I"t.° 7_A___.'_.,_4__6t:•Ac'_:.4:._..'t:.'U:-'.':.oi;.'‘.lV,.T''1*.,:'I..77 i",..:.0tZ,;S?L6.L y,k-•,.r;.: '•....•:.".:•1.;.:“,.4 1......I,1..J!,,_,:N-_1.,..4..'1 ,*-.4.,-.%--,;s"'l':I.,„:x ft...4....‘..,,..,,,-,,.^,0,4,.::"......:.2.:,‘.:•.:f:f:...r,-;,,,). 7 7•L„.I..N,,..'- i•1..::••,:(!.:f$*i,•• t,mO.l.-•R:y.T.,„1."1..,.'‘t..i",...etl.'.r,N.O.-_/.,, I•, I, 1T.OvA..1%3A.1IA1.S 11SmO..,AK,,1,4FoV,o R,.4aS1AdV1RUom..1.iIR.O..l!,L.N!,I11.4Y A,AiG4Fr..R t s,A1ADDITION 1 ;tp M , , / 0: ' 4sN .O.1...•1001I I1 I A/ A, S r''•0 IMC.O.HR,CAR SIR•IMIRUSS.,1•L • • City of Southlake,Texas 0 STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-057 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Timarron Addition, Village J STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition - Village J, being legally described as approximately 56.817 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, and being a portion of Tract 3C7, a portion of Tract 3C2, a portion of Tract 3C2A, Tract 3C4, Tract 2, Tract 3A3A1, a portion of Tract 3A3A, and Tract 3A3B. This plat proposes eighty-four (84) residential lots and seven (7) common greens. LOCATION: Approximately 520' east of the intersection of Bent Creek Drive and East Continental Boulevard and approximately 260' south of East Continental Boulevard. • OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved (4-0-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendment: 1) delete requirement # 7b (provide a minimum 150' cul-de-sac length for Street 'B'), provided that the City of Southlake Fire 1 Department has no issues with the requirement. 1 STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated June 13, 1997. • L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-057PP.WPD , • .. •, 041*,,,,,,-0 .- : '-f. g' g a , - 3°3D22,A 30 3AI '''•••••1, 30 k .-.-.. • e•-iisi .....•'pi • . - , 3o i ---L___ 03 ..___ _.. ,. '- I I, ; — 31' 37-1 131111113C 30 .atc:3-3---stmk, 4 F.. 8 ___--7:2"-^---....-----.L7-__11 t -. --ill a I,4=;r:;IP Or;Li....L. .--..F. ••• ......T '' 3C .._...._..............--- - .., i Y. SE 50 .• . 75Cm 3A 3AI 3C 4, 7-• . diii 2 ittfif 30 ..3 ft LI E ........": 1 „ , tl A 0-1 ,.,f.i...I 50,1 I • '... G 77,3 k 5:sr'?Ac 10 At 6 Ac ..•' -8,63 Ac 57 Ac t - :... - . 't .. .}401)1- • C -. ? 301 '1 . ._ . ._. ._._ .. ; _ 5:4 ,,....,.... Girl 30 302 - IV I•-- , I -'1 -' , v '''.."'"-{,--.°".......„ i' 1 314. e.!6° ,,,, nil 15 k ) - ,, . .-. . V 2 II i.._.i •-•- 1 .-• :- ., \ Y ZAIC -1, •-: 2A-5 • ,cif ..0, a , ' ask ,...., 3 .,,.. k . .• ._. 3441 p,0 P"? 4 23 .• ..... ...e f. 1)I 1 elci e- L-' , If ...••--, 28 .-- . .-c s ,. i i ... ,.i x /XI t'• Pi • f24k ... 450_, rat cc4.4••i•' al "..40. 4. f Q t,t if-7A4. • . `r- A- - / , AG" liaL 1 . ea -- • -- - IF 7 ••- i... 31 !33' 28 283A IR 1,.. i 063EDIN dcg.1C, Hid' HT f 20 At .., WI 5 k / Ca ' 4Ac 5UuAr4.- .13.1-•'``• SUMCY A-ori :...:• 1 41 48 Nikr"rr .11 , I :'....., ---. 1 5)71 A 4 5 AC 1 2C 2C 0 2C2A t. 2CW(•L..: ...1 i i s .. .. .......,...., ......, 4, I. 131)1" )14 crp i, 1 . .AcKs•elp •S- ;....-..-„. ..,_... 4 at 4 Az i • •`..r . . . HIRAM GRA.W=.11- ft - ;,)-..;..1 .':....- ...„- ,A, r • ...,....f..40 ;,: ,,,,....ill •,, Ir— .-, WW1' AL:41 g --LI-- ' ........wr,I,T74-, i 814 ... ,...,,,.. .....}. ;...L.. .or i .,......... ... PP • \ i i 1 i....j g .., _.._. .1 LA ' ., . . . .". . ? 1 i • Ti'• ''. *4... r . - - i i I „. . . i - •.... ,, .•••,. • .,J— :1.7.0 ip ‘ ia ' ---1" -: -4,-fm4 -1 •0 - .4, • t.-141;:iti - i - •izi • 1-----n _ -10 ......1.._ IN • PARK •••-1-- - '- 1._ Alc0 kI ' • X i4-4-, •.•' • . . .. ••••••'r. _. :4 ! Xi I., 'ii"."4s.4 •--;.:. • i • ..r_._.,__„—"-14-7, [ , . 4 „....... :.._41 _ ----...-......... i , .... ........ , ! • . • ...... ...„‘ J ,...,,r .... 17.0--440311 .I. . ,, .. . • „....,..,_,..,.......,„; A - 44ar7.-....7•Zr.p Tel : 4A LAI .111MMINIII 6A F-67.1— . . _ , ! , ..,,,,,,,,j. -- _•_._._._Gt..or: ;Z.% .-... :I•4.,. ::. . .....%._ 74'.... ; -s 1. Alill '"°45.2iWgv, 44i, • ..,...,. „glee- A. -- "qgfil 6F1 6C If okii0P..i:ai - A•N -a a r emme ..... ......._ ...tql !,-,;* . k , '•4 -- • g P- -- -. i i -, ..,,..., , 1-A- . rpc.,‘...11.2te •., , ;„ , , ... ADANT r,...,. „:„. , -, . ..-- -.„,,7 • ---- ,y E• tA 18 }C •-- r15-.-- i , 'i I • itiO •I AP • i F--..., is • • .- .7 ... ._ ,,i...4 , ''.(1.141i9v1 , i%kir A4 , 1 , JI a',„kg- i • ., .._ .i. IA1 Illj i I • i I t I ,4810P .., . - -..- ... ..... .... - - . ,I f ' ' ' ' 1 ' ..\•:k. LI ''.. se - 2' 1-1 X -'-..---'.. illiabibs7'7-7- • • i 3 ` r 'A ",--7-10._ \ -.:-- --...,.. ... ! ! , . ! , ! ! i ! , " . , _ _„ . vkds, . ....... ............ :c., ., •I masnaa.111•1r,‘ .10.0,....1 . I . 7. 11!. / V . ...1 6144-1•• i r .% -g4 . •-....... • iii - •• - iii • iV In - i VF• "6 p41;if ' , •i' \---, ' --( --t-. .--tA. -4.N .,- •-• . -- • . • A-4' ' 4 - 1 2A3 '. .1.• ! ! 's ...,. IP t , . ss i ' , 7 •-• ...-r -. i f i A, - i . ° 1 t • • .i - ...."" ;Tie.s• I •-• ."17 ‘,.' ', " , .,. . .. -.J • .-, . '' -. ."f. ,.` • 41. ' • -‘.-. \ ,)--kr-. .,,, ,• 1 .-.. ., --.1,i-.-, f-•:-'1 - -4. .. ,tel• • .,, ;•-., r- • - ... ,,..,.i-,,..._ -::.,---,._.11. -•,•- ..-- , , . -- %. . .,•,, .k.._•-•%•-•_ ,i • wl- .,.. /7 / .- ii,.014 i t ' .... .-., -0 :.z:: *: - -,x-‘:-..v,...----:.. ,_.. / :a. -.. i • ...4 -1::.,1-. :.=-), .,.71-- .-- - - ?., ....- , ' -, .---k- '-> .4.-ez . ".. . ..71.' •:-.:.,,\. - t, .1- ,-, 4. .4-.-irc---- -lia: ' ' .-q .., ...,., ..... ....,.... . . . . ,, . . . I 1 i ‘ 4.., ;* "! A....." .-•,ort•nT.01_ . ,••?.,---.. f. ::: ,,, ! - .-- -1 • . •-• P 1 i i i \ %. HOE I- N _,.5 vvi,of :To- - • .. •-,- ac).2E — iWCYs4; .. • - i-.,'t ; • ,t -.r.;,:5,0„ ..1,4.,/,.. ,... . . . . , •; ! ! il .•! i.,-,1 7)14.0.t. ''''";-:;: ' -• • . ••• "\., ,/ i N ....., _,..,_.• . , . ' \ -.' :. L L 5\1 E 0 L N , 0 .:'09: T .••• :_e• 2 .. , : • i !. . .-1-4,'..i•-_,,. • lx,„; - -„, ! - - .,- . 7—:--411ilil , . *:1W'•''..2''. Itif.Z, 1 •,. ' : . ,. t -.71:1‘. . !ogse .,,,,1- • 4,::,_' ? .16:a I, ,i::-.:. ,- ".., Nil :'-• .-!..'`,:::.1. --',. . .....'f: d . •, vt` 01 . , , ' li 't i :::.),..:i ..?....7,::, --1'..:-:-- l,-----.. • •' :' , . ';''.- '''- • .ex'-' ../.1‘.. 1*-<,,zfi:i. ‘... \6,5‘tirk,',, i --: . . s .,/ 4,\Sff.,,.........;'i:, \.;--647!-:e..,‘, ,.. ..- .... / • r . „ __•-. - 1G lE - •--r' ,i .... /1 .. . .-.: „.... • .;.t. .2 \-.. ,- - c •, ..• . • ,.,,.. _..... •,,-• i•.', t-i. a • -G'p t., •,_- '-- ...I-7."' .''..- : i . ---,t-:' 1,-pal•t1t5g--;;? --- ,-- , -3 ‘. t.,-% , • ..• .-: .....11_.,g.• .., ,r01. " 17.16 44 . • ../ 3Ai•,... -- - , -.- ..,.- - ..-ipp- .-:.... - 2118t3 Ac "i;jo.--..X-7.....3. i . i • <?--, -..,. , ,... KA- . . „ ..... •,... , ... ! e ... ,- \ „ 1 , . .. c• H11-1- . (..-- - -,.• II A 1 i c•A R .s,I"'>..3::T't(t.;01". /1 ! '''' 141' ' 1 I. A ° ...-.z...A.,. .... •A a ! .t jN. p CE30'- -00H_ Lbw/r 1. ...,-;-. millimaiii 1- i‘1 i /j . ..."---• , PU'l\1 T A - ... • ILly!i.: , EHPORT- ' 111 T7 • •-Nsz ; i ---••• cti-\ .... -t- I--\,---. _Itt.irr..-• • „,..--c. ! _. 1 Az I A2A SI.R3er -412 TRACT MAP r7G- 2 City of Southiake 1111 Timarron Village "1" t , . V/1* 1 ' , 1 s 01.11.1111",* -. ' - ' . - \ ', ... .: ji . , 0S,11111/10vO• . , . , , , Silir, ** *** '- c ,, ,fr , ,, .. , „_ ow ••• , . , : ♦ , i „, - ! , „ III Poi " . .1-A (L ,...., 4 oisqr do ***/1 I 0* J. , • - °SI/1 1 I 111, . . ,'v...,. 4 4 A-1 w's,,,sss4.1 \ ,:,,,,,, / Io , *4, Ij , EE \\ ti , *W. \n..."°°.'..43."." - .. ,..,. ri ,-j---:-' ' Ilk al. Di IP 1%ii,,,. •%... r ,, , Legend ØOCLMEI ata has been cony kd for The Various '+' of Southiake. � Timarron 'Village ")" ether this Informatlon.Erery efbrt -7 G 3 ...n,.ae to�the accuracy 200' Buffer Area No Scale ogiven f=aidr ad-to .rxx y Parcels Within 200' Buffer Public Works - GIS • Timarron Village J Adjacent Land Owners and Zoning 29-May-97 # PIDN Owner Name 01 42168C 24 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 02 42168C 24 4 NEWPORT CLASSIC HOME 03 42168C 24 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 04 A1037 2A01 20 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 05 42168C 24 15 TIMARRON LAND CORP. 06 42168C 24 16 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 07 42164C 37 6 LEEPER, ROBERT 08 42164C 37 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 09 42164C 37 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 10 42164C 37 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 11 42164C 37 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 12 42164C 37 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 13 42164C 38 12 TIMARRON LAND CORP, • 14 42164C 38 1 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 15 42164C 38 2 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 16 42164C 38 3 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 17 42164C 38 4 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 18 42164C 38 5 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 19 42164C 38 6 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 20 42164C 38 7 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 21 42164C 38 11 D&D HOMES INC, 22 42164C 38 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 23 42164C 38 9 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 24 42164C 38 8 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 25 42164C 38 38 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 26 42164C 38 39 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 27 42164C 38 40 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 28 42164C 38 41 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 29 42164C 38 42 TIMARRON LAND CORP, 30 42164C 38 43 TIMARRON LAND CORP, S ALL ZONING IS PUD NO. 1 SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO -7 &-C.i City of Southlake, Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 41Wase No: ZA 97-057 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97 Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Addition, Village 'J' being 56.814 ac. situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Westerra Timarron. L.P. Carter& Burgess, Inc. 7605 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney. Texas 75070 Dallas, TX 75247 Phone: (972) 529-5988 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (972) 529-5540 Fax: (214) 638-0447 Attn.: Todd Jansen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. The following changes are needed in regard to notes on the face of the plat: A. Add the following: "Lots 1-18 & 20-24, Block 61 and Lots 8-13, 15-20, & 22-51, Block 62 are Product Type `A 'and Lots 1-6, Block 62 and Lots 26-38, Block 61 are • Product Type `D'subject to the Timarron Village `J' Development Regulations. " 2. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: A. In the 14th call from the beginning, correct the block number for ". . . the corner in the northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 11F of said Timarron Golf Course. . ." to ". . . Lot 1, Block 1. . ." B. Correct the discrepancy for the bearing between the boundary call and the legal description for the first call from the beginning. 3. The following are needed with regard to adjacent properties: A. Label Lot 1, Block 1 of Timarron Golf Course to the west/northwest of the site also. B. Show and label the type & size of each adjacent easement on the Golf Course. Also, label the type, size & deed record of the 15' U.E. and 15' A.E. filed by separate instruments which cross the Golf Course and the site. Show and label any easements to be abandoned. C. Correct the lotting for the southernmost portion of Block 38, Crescent Royal Addition, specifically Lot 43. Increase the font size of the lot and block numbers for the sake of • legibility and label Common Green 44. Show and label the type and size of all existing easements on Crescent Royal which are adjacent to the site (D.E., U.E., and M.&A.E.). 7,-5 City of South lake,Texas 4. The lot lines between lots 27-28 and 43-44 do not meet the requirement that all lot lines be 0 perpendicular or radial. 5. The following changes are needed with regard to street geometry and rights-of-way: A. City Engineer must approve minimum radii. Please confirm approval for the section between lots 17-23, Block 62. B. Compound curves are not allowed. Please confirm adequate tangents as required. C. Provide a minimum 150' cul-de-sac length for Street `B'. (P&Z recommendation: delete this item provided that Public Safety has no issues regarding this item.) 6. The following changes need to be made in the layout: A. Provide lot widths for Product Type 'A' and Product Type `D' lots as required by Village `J' Development Regulations. For Type 'A': the applicant has not provided 90% of the lot widths at the front building linez85' and four of the remaining lots (Lots 27, 28, 43 & 44, Block 62) are below the minimum 50' width allowed only on 10% of the lots. 410 For Type `D': provide a minimum 50' lot width at the front bldg. line for Lot 28, Blk. 61. B. Show approximate floodway limits, in addition to floodplain limits shown. Designate the area inundated by the ultimate 100-year storm as a drainage easement if intended as such. C. Label the type and size of the easement along the west lot line of Common Green Lot 7, Block 62 * If the intention on Lot 38, Blk.. 62 is for frontage to be on Street"A", then the lot line adjacent to Street "A" must be of a lesser width than the lot line adjacent to Eagle Bend. * Provide load and access width for the bridge/30' common access easement between Lots 15 & 16, Block 62 in compliance with Fire Department requirements. (Ord. 480, Sec. 4.2, "Frontage") For questions, contact Vicki Hess, Fire Safety Inspector, at (817) 481-5581, ext. 737. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage. park dedication requirements, and off-site grade-to-drain permission and/or off-site drainage easements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Carter and Burgess, Todd Jansen 0 Westerra-Timarron L.P., Steve Yetts \W P-FILES\REV\97\97057PP2.WPD 76-u • • • _ TA/ANNON 1 L'Are.I• 1410 :441.'S•••:.:V113 4.741•:.."''''"'"-"" 41 i- 77- r-“" --';',"0', r'f':(t I 1 .. .65 'fir.4ti'l". '4:41'=XVI.1'.`'..44""'""'""•"'" ' 1 -:Jo,..r.••"trifs,• riCA.NITAL • ? T '' tX.11•I'd:•=1:1 4.7•2.1:'''•'""""-'"" 1 r j t-_[--..-:_. , - : 4,v A ,L704.4wilx,::::itri..t.::,%.1•,...... UV ruarv.:&I..---•---- N '-'ii h ' '-i;Nit-: 1' sw•so-n-w .00-1 ..;'!".i --' - - ,..:'; li!....• ---, LIVT.:...01'.r.r.P=.".•""'''"". I ''01: 0 .:,',: 4,"r744:17:14,417°.':ualk="17Litillz*"'".•- ..,.:.:.-.V.111.7.11..T...1.-'.•---- '7 $,,, ,)..n ' ,i •-t•••i- ; ; . mu.-...7.x.::::-•----'-'''--"'"' :s.t.-:UM'V.".'"'=""'"-'''"""' t.".1:".•-:.r.M0 f."4.3`."''"'"'''""" ta.a vz,.1.•a•rx.t...=L.-.•--- 'A,: ,; 4iii,. , - , , ;,.. ....‘. ,F...,,,, ,.. ..._ ,". _z . . .-- :V.I.:L:11:V&Uhl.",•.•••"...". 1.747:11.1.74;17,7.-.M.6.`"''""-.--.. 'az:,kaa7,4 9."',..1'.:P".''''''''''"^" '42421.1.1X,7?.L f.V...."."''•"""'""'"'" tex... /.trerJ -.. ', '-j''''f,'17-,,, ' i hN.' / ''',V r "-'0, ir '''' :\‘‘`,k, ' 4X017.14t7:6•1 SIgt.'"".•"'"'"""""" 1241'.1.:•`31?.i.:rl."..'"'"'"`"""`""" ,a. •''. it'' c.":,'43" / -,- :r '' • '' • , t'.2.4 7'.:::::1....1.1.:::"'`'"'"""`""" Z.1.11:1.,14.1.7,'..:=.:"'''•"---"" I..,A 1.:.;11,;./..• I f .L• 'II.' • V Lulls:atm r.V.1!"'"`'""""-"" •-•-•••••••••••••• .-kt:41`..:01k71 r....---.1.4""-•"----- 1.-%741.1,-.z:-...a.1 ,-.2.2 - ,44.4 Egisimiclis_ DB ...-,...,,,,....,------ .. , . , • - .: '.. ' . • : - ' : . , ' ,' , rad r."28•.7.'17.1.••"•••'••••.".". LI•4156:41:40 T.T.C.1.'.•..."••.."•`• •=11.211ICAIME11.1-116 ..O•-"IMM M=1.1111MMIEM ICTI=EN:MINEREM=11:2:slirmINISI l- '- igl-,,i '::1.,4.-.1 I. '.* '' i-, '..' s S.$V•f.:S.,1'4, %\ T.." I'' 's I(:,_:?,', -'-'.-'-'7 r:v•.... zzraywn..-?,:.94':15".440:14.it"". =....- -a,--r:rz. - IN:1111=1111:11MIMIZINEIIIIIMEXIIZO ).1',' \ '''. ' ,`K- \,'- '''''''''' '1'.., 1•"?'''-,,ir 4•4- - • ,'O'-,,,--<:"-.,;- • hi-r1.-i-c-Ics-i.:-.,,,-::::Tr.--trz.--1--:zr“...:16:3, VW CA/V10 0001 MOO 100.0 CAS CAPPLO AO.POO WI IMINUMICIIMAMINIIENF311.111MEMIN -,• ' '1144.1 - 'I -4S• SO .,• .•• c:'-` ,AItioqiElgilralatf0DITIAL !,- - . • .......................„...... . SMUT CTN. LC Ultir•(ASWAN, 1111111:11110EIMMINMEINILIVE / '' ii..-,••-.1, 4.4'r. '''k ' ,/.. c,p,‘', . :'1:ft t'T 1.:' ,, , ' - -,,,-=, .T.•41."'"•'"'"'"'`"" Of 01104.EAU., 111. NATO.LK M • • Z.:....ir:.1:111..:,-4;:--'---.-- m ' innE=:1112Smi INIME.91,15111 I t ,. ; •`-,: '• A ',..„_,c -,- •, ‘, 'D.,.1.\"'cl ,.., __-,--...._i,, ,,,,r...2,,,,,z,:;,:r. :,.-: _-..:: 1 =M111111:MIMM .11 -11111111111 •M a=1=1:111•311=1:•1111=11111:111111EME.11 ,....,,, ca.T....sitt,c,ilsa_64,,..-,,,,,•-,,i 6....... : e., , , • * ,,,,• _ : S, ..,,-...,, , ,--- _ , .4, rzh,. 11-,r+•;214:-. MME1311211 .„.„..,Te„,..•••••••'.•.............. .0,,,,,,,iiii60, .2 , n • X , -• • ,-° • • A, , „..,,,___ G.)1 - ti''it-: -/ : , -'' ‘st, .'. •-7'-- ,,. ,..,, '',,; '.,,'.. t".,.. •r",,a2,1„.....-- 1111:1====11:1=111 11111=1=11=1=11=1Mal •.M. INEIVIEMZE M:=1:111=C111:111=1110111711116111MMIMIIIINC/EZE =3==l1111•11MIN11111:1111=INECIIMIIIIESENZE -, ; .I • '' t 'C','„ 4 d .' ; .,,, , ' . Si- -.0.'" ..; '' ' •' , e • ,y...;:az•v&-aue••••--- 1' i'' ' I.- '1 0 ail --, , -,-,__. ,' '•.•.,.. '0, • •• ' '' t.T.irr----."-------- imilimaza::ismossomiwill . _II. _;*-- .L .,. s,'si__, ,t, : .,, - ,::,. \,,,',.-, ,,-„,,, ,, , -,,-,,--i.,,/ ;,,.7---- MANNON =11=1:31111MINIIIIIIIIIMMIEM231•111•11111111=1•1111 1:2111=INIECC:111=::1111:1181=11.1Mirmain ''''....1, . , ,,, ,n. ,,,, r,(,.‘..1 ' ,:•; -, - ' ' ' I ',,• ' t .4 .1 `. • - ' : / , 'I -, t .' ,', ,1 0, , c•1711111t?ITN 1411(1 /0•00,.10 40.0C MC=:111111=111=1E=i11111111211111=MMOMM211112111ZIE Ll0,100101/DINNIV NES/KW. IIIMIIMIIIIIIIMCIIIIIMMINIM:M=111111=1111112:11 ' *'; ' , • AVOMAN' , r • - „ .- . / t ' •,)''.'p : ;, i-) _.. 1,•--),;,' ::„ IIAJ' ; :,'"''''.- •T .-• ': , .--7--- . ' ,' 1 ' 2. '' ''/' '-' NOVEL - -•..•I 4, ' .. . • I IT-'..1....' - :-II, - 11 ‘I ,0.•'-' I'.. •••., • ,, . ,• ,C.1 I, ::: p...:_,„„ _ I-r- I,, . . •'' P IllPvIti01 f.trx1.11•".«,.•;:ott•«A.,.....: •:!.' -.-, r, ,• .' 4, ' ., _ shiG _ T. t, "-:'',, • '‘ ),__----- ,""km'' ...' - . • • ',.. ' • .'•-, 4, t , 1 -:., , ,, 3-val..?.../0ALLOAS ALL RESIOANTIAL LOTS.CONI.MAK ! \ '' 1‘ \ ; ' '''';41: i' --'. - ''' - ' i'',,-1 ----- ' '' ,eirl-,,,,,,,,r ' ', r' ,.,,7-A z i• ...,C.N.i."°,77.,N7''...).6,ALS SNALL WI hi LOCA„I?MI.•.. '‘ II, '' I. ,.., ' 41°. , • f. I..•L,'''••k•II, . /' , .,-r%kit",,,,"1" ''.."” ::. - . ' ! - n '. .G.1," ' '• , .6sars . - S AL C CINLIT AREAS AK 10 IN CO..OWNS 0.0 ,..4-, '-' 2? I "..' r49.U.51 __•_• _ .-" ...ALL SAW.SIRTIL 1.1 ANA TO IN INNOVLO 00 NNv.' \', • 1.0 ' ...7 ..k.' .• PC-- . ''P'...; r .. ,.. ‘•,01, ' _. ' - ' •••• 1 1" - i , - - V) \,,;)1k I, . , `,.-4(-1) ''''.4;,- ,,.r -41,,. *--.., , : C)., _ i_(' , „ : , i R JUN ECD 1 0 199P‘c, ' .,'" . ' ''.' , ;1 . :,",4,. '-'•-••-0 .Z.\ \ i 4, ' %4 "1 : i ) ' r,,,:'•4-.'!:,• -"----'-'-,-.-:-_,--.:-, ' ' ,_ - ' ' ITO VONS.101.1.• I I ---•I.• •. • •' ..;• • 1. II..-'AI,....".A.....r4'...• ..t.. • , .frIP'- , .-' -•-,, , ,,-, ,,,- q :: :''••:-•-'-',.- ',..... /ALL MI ' \I; -0- '‘,,Z.•.. 00,-.0t ,''..,... •••• .:1 'r• ••• . .' c 1'i 10 -At ' ' .'‘ '• ft.' . - .--, • 0 ---, . '. )\ ...,,,,,,-,•......, ,,,i...._ 'a -- , • 4,7-14 - ..ersc.i17377 •,•* ....".0. ,,,,,,„, ,... ,„ e 6, * r.• • ;,.....A.p.r,g NM ...4., .'9°' -. e.. ''t"' ' 'swi-•3y.ir.-7:••• ` \' ." -t 1, •I1 (.4 i 'I.'10.IIIPOL4=1?°1:40.11 PIIII•11111ART PA AT ' NA'I' ; 0 , • . 4 TIMARRON ADDITION , II.,• T. ., VILLAGE I ''-,* ..,..; „,-.1.:-.. "wt.'', ' „„.„., . „:-,.%i„:01-;;,•,-„,- c, ,. ,. . . ,.- .'s,,.i/.05• OW Of IIII .1 AN IN IN SIAN?I.ANS INA/I NO 1011 .... L 01 L SLOCA 1 INIICT 10/c-,2,1,3•01 ',VV., ,•,,•7.,r.r.•)',.! ,_ . .••I 1__ ,,I's _ • ts 'HA.' •I. ,, "VII- (--) 4#j so'•`" 41 ' 4.,..1.-1K27-1•ctigr. 51,1101 AtTiFS/OA LOTS ......I, ' ) 0116•464 11/1•71150.• 10.110,P45100 .1;4(00-1-. •••1,... ,,, ,.. A L ,4 4,i i" - -, .- 1 COMMON GREENS , 21.33' ‘‘ .'."‘ s• ••10....• .'*;if '' ../.1.1 IN VII ANION*I SI,oNIA IN/010w.N 1101•VIII,..•PAIN.•AT • ' )4/. . ... . ,,_I''0.- ‘‘.‘.,,,.., '''i A ''''' •:.... .‘ : Wm.(V,II‘AN 1.10/0 1911.111 S.11 I AN PI/:1 S/N NS?.•.1'. • ir'<••4 , 1NI.III.i.1.1114 A 1.•I s,. •I'11,1 I '' I ,.. 1 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-063 PROJECT: Plat Revision -Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 14R through 21R, and Lot 22 (Common Green 58), Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One, being a revision of Lots 14 through 21, Block 55, Timarron Addition, Bryson Square, Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3444 & 3445, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 2.880 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. LOCATION: South side of Saxon Trail at the intersection of Amber Crossing and Saxon Trail OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. •URRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Steven Lallier, 720 Ashleigh Lane, Southlake, in favor of. Letter indicates residents decisions regarding the common area bordering the creek. See attached letter. P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997;Approved(4-0-1)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 1997. L:WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-063PR.WPD �14- ) • • AA A1.®.�8• 8 • • ..•®�® .. 1 92 \.; i • �t:•• izD 00- 'c C 'F•IF! Q p •5f t': IA. I f' l,.` • e.�C , • rJ' A +Q �• t,,° V. 6i.Mi :itcij$ t� - °tl �.'1".4". • -* ` _. • l: 12 14,11,61 ,. 'I o'o e im . 94 8818 as i 3A s 3A2 • J t0 •.• ! 1 I - gipP,14,., i .24.�1 Ac I. ��-,..my, !•• jam'. . .. ,,,,.:::. , •.i ., ...... •. .4.; 1 y e I. ,k.,A, • di i • - lEi- •: -� ' •°. .1 -.�. . Alt . 9• _. RICK-,I D E�° t017;om./JISY7r. T 4�: s•..,!� •1 it' !,...�. Y ' �' f. • • , . i•-•-1 T1-3. • . :..•/.... j•�i-•rl'� ' .: ' i'''.1. ' ' i •••I. - } 1 ' • ., ' 9.. —_ ter-• i •--i•--t-C. '' ; ; N J j CR i iJ 1 i r ! )- j i i ! • 1 1 1 • i i i 1 1 ! i v ! --'..-• --•+•-• 4. ; i •i i ; i . �-, I ;i - �l - ze b i 11 _ _ CITY �IU: i /\ • -+- ,- i i i i 1 _ E-._ —_._._ �8 r E,.I:.: HALL 3A _. ._ 7 . 1 i _y 1 ; ( E _.___ •-_AE. .._-fir ----' . 7 J.•_. - n �j ' i i -, i 1 ii i 1 yd' •\ ! i ! _ _ f _ -i---1--r--N'-, i 1i i i , \i i i , i i i PARK i i ! i ! ! ! ! ! + i i i i. .. ! ! T_-_•-4_ j i ! I..--_. 25 Ac i 1 . 1 . , �i i ` j - —1--i--.1 22 Ac . .�D3A 303 3C 'T. • i `�_ 7.665•Ac 3.1 Ar • - _. 11.11.... ' _ m V ' -}-}� _ i !!' •r_d5--i••,� - 4E...8..... 1 �i 1 1 `�t �� 502A 303A1 �� 3C,4 �I 3D��'I(vu -CS) rrrrr'''�. - _ _ ._ .: 'III 4;144-6.3,u_N,an r-M .__ — 3c - .. 50 5 SE w 501 502 I \ \M C 3A 3A1 3C 36 4C 40 -A � • 381 r°� .:�' S5pp,, sai Ac 3.56 Ac x 111 , .P�i 10 Ac 6 Ac 5°11'143 Ac 4.57 Ac Dl C 2k 5 At �' '•' 30.6 Ac Ailii OOP' P lA 1s A 3NiriaH:' .. 30 302 ! + , >--�-rFIt5 \ i A `\ \ i i , i 1 , 7K ` g _A:C 2AI2A1 2A2 2A5 �.• • 2A3 2 _ . ' 423 Ac _, 2A,B 2o,tt--'• .%- :X.>'l oI Q 30 S.. 1p .' P y�UR 2.- 21 Ac1... A-, �_ •-y • `i• VINE COURT EA T G J 1:'. b1 \. I . ` X ICli , Q- J/ .©. g y � - :J i '� i _. 1 4.5 AC .._.,or.._., r f'-' .1_. .� i i i-• �� I-, .tCvs ..1� a ! , • __ t � iii r'p� A Ac 4 Ac ♦ YA •� ! i ! ! ! ! l - rin. ri,,J. _ 11 '. .1.:: _r 10 Ac I -+.*. i9 -.-._ .,.1 ' 'L r.` a_: } IMg. .. . / \ 8AI • 50 5Cl ; I ! _ R _ 4 Ac PAR. ` i tv.- cr. !r..L/7"...it....ti- NI •N H ••ki-..4-•-i- i • I 1 4;C1 AC 'A F ,,.. -; TRACT MAP cl _ ,.1,� Ilr 2 , A, -1 S;n . 2C • I ?? I it -. 2'1 i 1 - / l IIzB I R3 I ( 3 ADJACENT OWNERS 0 @ .111 I :I1 a AND ZONING TR 302 1 I c z_ L _ 711 SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO 4.2 AC TR 3D 4.2 AC 1R "ZA3R 9 .11E �R2E�, PUD NO. 1 97 1.0 . , i Biel 2 61 • TR 2 . \ 0\% ' I . 41) .:,„.. 0. vi. \ -1. N. KN1 Y . . 0► SCR 09" • . Ai ( 1) ..\[\ TIMARRON LAND CORP. \ • .. \ �./ \ J •• / 4 U0. / 70 �� . TR 3 4z -Q� 40 AC —, 6 co 8 , O�� , .�0� \ 2 35 2C tW J �I `l.�) I t f r7/ $ 65 • w Y -JI• 6w!* ; izT: , • 13 ." �2 \ O E aiL•FIGH LN < \ t 6 rt �O�qF s 12 o o » �m 1r , C,O a o �'`nz 1a ail. _w.5 ,,,, U 7 5 13 J4 5:� 56 TtMARRIr5 _ cc 11) H3 . z • i = (21 • ID Z at 1 LOCATION w ; I• /,r\. _ i.N.N illAI . d� I• j PIA�aaR��• f'i ' » ~ } • „ w r»ar t S a 0) r. ,� •.Li• TA. . - ---.y� t-i'`° ` a Mi.K` p \ Z I I 1•.IrI noon 1•tc DATA noo•law[DATA ",••„ \\ •, i J • _-, ___ • .17 / :I ! .•1 -1rarer• •«- • •v.v,f• n•, •rnM„............,' ..._. i • ir. �` We 2 w w. v 1(/— ... •..na• r ..w .rw.•. w. ••••o r , _ \__— i'•1� r •.. •w»Y. r. Ma .NwY• nr Yry 0211 1 .•» •w,rvr. w. m a 0221.3.. n» urwvl. 1•'N'as l :)// I• d•1•• .u. •.r1,• r.. Farr _ ••`kP[ 1... 1000 C •l • 10. . N•' '¢IU yA ♦ '-A .• k tg. s.iic.r. \ i N.I I I—,, LW is I 11:Ir.' .100 • aa[. „ \ _. ---- , !" n »r•�...•..a.:Y i ,...•.car. • I •..•;* I _ __ . FO • OL: {� •w.'"i'• as a von w•i.c..c[ ur• 1'nT I. • a.k��'8 1.�, I 1 •at'• ' }; Lu:b 3'.,^ , eras a 1 1 . ,♦ 1 '; : 33 141. "Wirdrz •••.._ \ �—W ao�a -- . 44,, 1.,.•^'\ r n` _•.• .- '\•!•/7 u• RR ar.• a 1 a awrai 1� s� `s\ - 1. OCTAL'i .«6�'.,l _• r 1 -r , a/. ''•o 1�••,a.I • • rL000nAw a ri000lAr OCT. L ..ern••.,1 ,:!y` a ar t s u•.;�-k+i— s,.�r, tmmrj..è ; i `•1,.,, •e 4.40i k-�....V. "t-,'•,"i yrk.... ...,,,,a-,.,;..., I `1\ r.l e r a "• R— k r $' a ... s 1 GS[K•I 1M[aN�A �P»+•,rt•LOT TAW I ..—•p• --- i _•-n .. •' a1�ra.ar• 1y•.1 1w I••p•I P08. IE 2. '•• „•!;:. J�+'!}y. ..;` ♦ .'' Ir 00.aw I a▪t •wnY . » . » ana• n . •01 p• •.w•r• ,n» w n » ••.r ,..e 9•�__� I ;• . _ .� !` .•�}•- a , • -'•� Ei •O•f Yaa'♦••[ .A AS 1 w •- aa.lk i AA IV `9`t..- `a 1 a Z. .I r w.•` �•r;r • L' y 1`""W w• ..1:.„ " ` 1 ->- :-k+_•-_.. ..r.'`'N=•' i-r R.N .:Act iris ' an • CLAM OAIA Ir R.O.V. r..„Ja +i-04•J ••1•••, .re FINAL PLAT 1. .•raw.• _ o w.N.1 aep..• . / .sran . Rua" "!.."- ...'1" =l1�` ••Nv a TIMARRON ADDITION el worst •w» •. •. - ' _ .•x , a ''• m:r'•6N .-p� --� I BRYSON SQUARE .• �x n.• new ewv w.�1E;tar / . \wrr•u u,•'2 _ az « \ •i R» wY1 • .«.r w • . . • •• t'::i. ik [' u w a+ :1: i PHASE ONE •' » » 00. tar .. n Far • p1• aua'w• .1. . Amy, nen »n nn er•ft 1•A•DATA » w„•�' `� ___ _______.___ -- E oral T.INC OSIN an•r '\^ \ or.•r•o.r SwM Ars Acr•o.R•R ft• A. .WSW• 'er'01 3.101. ale •. »., t • •••ww•• says. •p.n—m a••»-••••r.p.v 11••s 1 '"E ... •en••• an r ' 1 • As • • ® a ....worms Mtiw o l� t:•:` OR K SO,OlA,1f,rA♦WA.I COUNTY_Raga ,r ASA • rune, • 21.17a ACRES .. ..,.Y • worst. •�•"'•.•••••.mf Sr.•"m•"' T•.A 44 RESIDENTIAL LOTS/ COYYON GREENS O.ta/OEKEOPEa:NCSITNNA 1LA_ nor./ ann./• a Ng. NAG*.• f01 rR0• 1I•(aAr a.a.Y a . .a+.s • ,•SA—V.TEXAS 75070 WOIon» ♦ MIS ., « • " _ d Aral oaf-asw 04. MN CMS UP1111• .o.w•'w.ter .nr ... • .w.ww. [..r.w..o•.. wrtayaKrpEcc �f�Gr•Burgess•�'•.ai0 1 .ev .•• Assts.. N..+o a•'�.e: �`ore'•� • .▪ a.a(fw,0.00 WOW., Or w1rK .r•f• • 4`gym.1�—=T�•r.p•gr......mo.p _ "MNOW., , • 11. error a MN 1 • c+,o••t•.taa a= V u••••.•,•11 M•R,soar r era M••[wow..•.1n• ••."V• w••1—�1•••• e 14.1 I 41.A—IT WOK., Col 6/141, e•nr• 1,314 g.1 9134 Meitr' ewer own.au..woon , . reran•• •• .•••..c•••»r r••r». MARCH 1997 l Kr a F nun.tA,»apf ITS .•••r ON IN noswllS• ,.•. •n •a.n,• aro ..n♦.•as w r^'o•^. U.S Pt.•1 OLEO..G•.tT_A__.S a_irysf- kii a•<(1 I Or i CASE NO: ZA96-III FILE NO. 01-283I 4h1197 .\wnn.nw m,1 1\2.•sn r,«•n I. 1 Previously Approved Final Plat �] "^. ..�.. '1 1,;,,•,?..:9"'...'.r ,..Nor..... o ei ®ro a rn a o...erg.aarw2rM.,.�i..•a.T::Pori...N ro_bwIt . iwra7 Y,iM .•N re•...g. • CI. =wM7 .1• /�v e ..Nor.... ZE''W.L7 ..Nee. )hr::.:V7.ter.7 ..Nyerr--- 4a 2` •• ...7�v i��a r�.r.r ��w i�rr .1•.a r... i M ggr eq rL. r.r. ........rrw F.Z. .....1...V.... u. m wM"N a...go ✓" � .•N asun. �".� __ -- r _r twn .a 0. . .i�� tei.. w ..�..No N W L _..�.,.. .,Y„� . e .r jr%u .• yYor....e • z SOUTIILARL YLD IF II MO.17001 a!l V a: 4 . N.re... YARAtlA YIDTY R.O.Y.) • r • .r.iYlas o.:=.1.. .w••u. l....... . r ,(. 2�.•.ryyv � N—e w. J� I Y....t..Y M..n.Ar.n. F . II, .� I - r�i �t Rr .. N.n r nws •®wry�. Y.�a Ye n4. .at ..2. `�� ; I f.•rY ru Nrr�14"m t.M.a�ywr.•=r r iRr .Y..i.clan t. sac ........ il` ` . a....wu I I - .nra �..m• Mu+ia..wo a raL1..0 ,YM,�`r.�. - ry`i ..YN r "' e•.l.[... ..1. I iw�44 �� .is ▪.n..�o ..v. ..N.nru.o ........o.........r.r�.•Y 40.•. N ". OPAL PUP ...AY f tau..A01.1101 I o i�•i.v� N �" M� .fit I ergo riot ......12 r=?N. 'aa�Mill Ca AGE Nf. 3 I .� ..N rrrao ® e. iiim•Ar' jJ r. I :11:7:.:.... � new ago ar.oeoo �i.s .o eo n.o....r C..00• •R N r e o.gs w �•�e- ON of ~.r.rze I .I w ..\....r ego LEI"' *F..�.I v, 11111.1. I �td� LC• W I.'••••• I t..m..�na rw.f▪Nr.Yrn�o eaR M wR .en I . -um 7�=a.. �▪ su..r..atrear.ra...a.....aoa_o. wi.�waio.f1 • H....._v .n..o r �Afr.1.2. N I ♦ ..�..nari..a. -▪ �01a��m ~ ` I )ram a .i •M b+go r o..molls• I `=..L.t c.=w FINAL PLAT I Or 1 ..,E••oting Ara .a. 8 71c nI 1 " "_ ..N r rr TIMARRON ADDITIONAY I.. . _ n::.:•ear"' BRYSON SQUARE �p� D..1:7 2N )c+.v:iv7`,.7. '•N—r°^- PHASE ONE 27. •r.... wTaM • �..** D.Y....oll S.N.AOSIRACT.O.YYe M ..: •'�raQ�•.c an Or Sq.1NAR(,T.RRAYT COMM RYAS Y.ch,..m I`: . v. N...r.... 2I.174 ACRES ) .:Wilt=^. ..N•..r o..o to RESIDENTIAL LOTS/4 COMMON GREENS 4171 CSIIPPIA MAROON.LP. .... .p Y r ..N.r a eves N.CR/0(\RORR.• MOOP.N.P.M.,.mrf n o>.Yl .•N.w r eggs Ytlr K.1172)n.A211-5)!O)O 5.1 wir .i: •N""r.w. ENYrECR/S.MYEYOR:AMAMIImi W9rR--'iA_ Tw:i:'iv710.4". .•N ara•go b.lY.,a�C 4.11NI 'a .n.•• )r��ri .i.vow WV+ N e.o e.... • ..• .g TNT RAT RED N CAY.(l_R_-SLOINIf.L Orkik UARCN 1997 SHEET 2OT 2 CASE NO: ZA96-111 FILE NO: 01-2631 .HI7I5, I.r ..1au.n. --- .\vM.uTsn22 t..i\w.l\2.onD,E PP rOVeCi ��►'l a �i Q+ T- ?reu iDu ` S 1 • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY "lase No: ZA 97-063 Review No: One Date of Review:5/30/97 Project Name: Plat Revision - Lots 14R thru 21R, Block 55 and Common Green 58, Timarron Addition Bryson Square Phase 1 being 2.880 acres located in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Westerra-Timarron L.P. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7905 W. Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 McKinney, Texas 75070 Dallas, Texas 75247 Phone : (972) 529-5988 Phone : (214) 638-0145 Fax : (972) 529-5540 Attn.: Steve Yetts Fax : (214) 638-0447 Attn.: Todd Jansen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. Place the City case number "ZA97-063" in the lower right hand corner of the plat. 2. Change the title block as follows: • Plat Revision LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55 AND COMMON GREEN 58 AS LOT 22, BLOCK 55 TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE PHASE ONE An Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 Being a revision of Lots 14 Thru 21, Block 55 of Timarron Addition Bryson Square Phase One as recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 3444 & 3445 3. Change the title in the owner's dedication to read "...Common Green 58 as Lot 22, Block 55..." 4. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200': A. Show and label Common Green 58 of the adjacent approved preliminary plat of Timarron Addition Phase V. B. Label the block number for Brenwyck Phase II. C. Move the deed record for the Rucker Family to the east of the Timarron Phase V plat boundary. Label the "Approved Preliminary Plat for The Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto." 5. Show the northward extent of the ultimate 100-year storm limits on the graphic and in Detail 'A' and label as D.E. if so intended. 1 /^ City of Southlake,Texas 6. Provide utility easement(s) for water, sewer and electric for Lots 14R& 15R and any other lots that may need easements for utilities now within Lot 22. Change the number of the proposed common green. One common area cannot be platted on two different final plats. This will affect the title block, the note above the title block, the owner's dedication and the lot designation on the graphic. 8. Show net acreage for Lot 22, Block 55. 9. Label the 20' building setback line within the plat revision boundary. 10. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/09/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. • Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Carter & Burgess, Inc. Westerra Timarron, L.P. L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97063 PR l.W PD • / YY- 7 Z O ' 0 --: . nDo. .a - 0 8 l' a Cr D 300 to. 0016 ... `▪ ........ � OH I. -,, a Moofao'. �:"<.' a"'�"oa:0£w�a: 0Nw� n.>rw Al.D...c�,..o....w —�o.,o Q O .... -Ix v.. w •� .1., mi ' i kF ` µ u"". •m'If'"»'w'^ .91E 1160 ..> __ n. .w...o .. o 1- I-O a* ! 'S4dkf0W_F [�r. +. . L, '''' S:•�.0"66 Irn vow ...... ..... .� D m.. ..•..... In IS 0 r G a / a } •"'.I'6v'a,,, 10.. p•«.u. D rawo.awlo:.".`�..oa w! w.< JN 61 60 .a .• m r..e.N.N...... «. o.,,,�® NE LAiI . c •` ) rap s a.cc DUAL•A• a., i �a[" CN'.Sti a.m IL000FIJN a FLOOOWAY MAIL .v: .rowat .r,• v w.o p.p.v 0•6 r 1101 IN Q / ..,1� .. .D........•.a..r O. _ _ OWN1 P411 .• /aH)IOI �, o�K w.olo.�[l.�u[v vO�Iwi'u4 aNw w.,y.',muai Z . 1131..Nw A0010.PMaN a ;\ I ' 1.0 W• ww....M.r'.r<in� Ill'tt'1� W ,-1 Irot 116 1Iw0DR v. 00 M w ~ ,Y ,;°:. / HAl,.). • 1 1 .or�ia1.c.�.`il ra �rw.u�..`.'.� u'.N.'.uw"w.u.uV.u:.n w..,s D.•.r.D.1. t L 1 my • •pe `�.3 [-`a'`0• •, a / ' / a a \ hui«na'ml'"R.n re iA s1 T▪1a ii:Wriai l.j="Pe a•ixi '•" ••w7 mo rt -,�. ,c '.,, - �E- .aTN•L'E \ ,000:=ate to.'0q m n..T 16 o 60610•11 •444,A4•ionuw.o• ....,10. ....,m u. 10 "„ -9 e �a'w to. L a . a ...^ID. .N;n,•Lo0 00110..�o 00 .r:$..:. r V` .tt[0`°rdU tit$..°.,`bo`g"..�°9"13...•or,. ' .i a ' ,. ) : 1 m...N'•iwo110�'m r1a+1 i�,u .nr«..co'o... ...,'b.n..0 3000, uNA.•Dn.Done« `'� l i y 1 '.1 `','..yea.. �ai....a n°""`.o.or .MAX OM[ �•' U`.�. a'i�D �.f �0.. i •. �� I f.w dr D.e�'o.gash''..w.s6n0 CAM CA•.A sla a.a. : . 'Y.4, .a.., .L Ai.P .±LI.,� r 'f-'�'�.,�'t`,'S. _ REVIEW AND COMMENT IA.TL1. A.m '.Y r;.. ' ioa 2•- 2a11. .F r • a r dN:ad..a"'.c yy.,-1x "N 8a �"m r . •e'' P'.N R: 'r_y'R 4// I ogno•a g.°."li.a.w scow., • awl wi 013 ...,w. s....ww. J h .s tin -'� 4'•.�N �.- .-�,a 7�`' 1 , I 0.1 a ,r .N 2,.d•nolw ri AO a a'mir..:t rt. w. Laa Y - • .y —ram+1.��.r ( 1L.a1.Tl ''�uaa w'r..V w •t m+m.io no'[wuw Va9 •lie In, ''r {• Ma.SM Al.[ v D'.rG.. w v ao..0'.T ' , a'• �,. 1 17 I wESTELIAIT,.ARSO«•L.. L•„y .a N. - 1N 9 aN {mL•1', ,A/.tlL 12412.PAU 1.31 cwr H.rG...>1[w LoNcu(YAM Lbw1M'W.' a yY _ -j • fa • JI / SWIM'Y t \•-' ,>< a-. ti-_��.g1•. _ i I a 00��L r Al lY)Y�1,r w -' =�Li�?'_.._'.Y.n`m._{ `%T1i p • u.®' M_ 1 \Y�NN'iYJ '.•l nwI r1A...s k [—�q�1gIIIi I • r. N Or lait Pta Ma.O u.sa..l w.'.uv w l,NMO«AOpI101. 1.0 1.114.N (I^ ., I^ I N I N is -� i \ al DOa Y.[rm.aM W u WS I.M.ri Y2s.0 i oaY CA..A.Sill.).Sa Lb11.Y } .,.. aas - ma Was L P.•.T.cT. CLw Mr LW Y F-_ �-••�• r t r.» ASHLEIGH LANE(SO'R.0.Y•) \,1 .,• ant PLAT REVISION I011IDARY 11NE DATA "� Of UK .n«ofa a..w...' q`I'Q(,3 LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55 aa'a EASEMENT LINE DATA ROOD LSM DATA-- ROOD WC D.T. AND COIiAYON GREEN 58 r.. MRNOARY CLINK TAME nr — •'+� • ' - w -r ........ � REC'D MAY L 1997 TIMARRON ADDITION Fo7-sw al [.00• maw us 10001, 0u�;n „„[ 1010 •.00.. NW •WNW• We BRYSON SQUARE ..r,. PHASE ONE • On aMIAf• •1 AL330'oa•T�'N'o00 •w��n num Q.Of nit 1010. . . .1 wr0p..; ,1�'r•«sl0a..Or:=4'..10 1..o..R.......r OK.N O.W..NIa11 SURVEY.ABSIRAC1 HO.599 IRN .aura[ „, „[ on. w mwo..wy,0 . ME , Oa.al l . wg Opal aaro ii..v 0 .4l'.-.w.'. CITY OE SOI.TNUME T.xpANi COUNTY.ma's _ .+.rr a or mar a AIM VI cv1..c«Mai __--.a•a.,�- ,.. oNv. .. — Uwe w .'..,roe a.... ow.. 8 RESIDENTIAL LOTS/I COMMON GREEN .ate« rra.Imp a a�.if i ' varar. •<•...d n.r. .. 2.880 ACRES c •Do • r °r• COS .1.13 001 ill an «Inn,a 1 •vva. . W. ""° W� p.Hex/pc•,ElOCER WESTER.IWMRON,lP. as auuw u'. •lmrar. . M ,aolz.. ..10 'u....m'O1m:.mc�D:o'.".. �'°�0�1°i° )SOS NPCM4 PARNNAY OfCommixI s ssrr[ R1a •Mr.• a. al AL m r.Da.w A.a.m 101.r'e'..r A.DrevN N.,✓r..miry 6.013013 YCERNEY.TEXAS 150)0 Oa.l ONG.AN AM MI.MOM1. .J..h..w.a.AT.N Ma.a IOre. (91x1 3x9-59a8 W II.1wMA+.I.e.1 RUM Ur..w •NI w It NlR1...LW Nw,.I L.)�'r '*a�`SAT N naa.s.o.a.w. ENGINFEA/41RVEYOR. /.� AAA' YAAI.II WON a..A,u.[4 l.., '• War.. I v.YO...op..fW. CarteraBurgeas t.1 • e. • av,ar....a,L...L... 1. Ara.vf a an CAM".WPM.. N.R � THIS PLAT IlLfO IN CANNEr .PACE MAY 1997 ( FILE NO: DM aD..nw•.D'A.ass1001\0.A\I117 1 City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-053 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Christian Men's Network STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network on property legally described as Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2120, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.97 acres situated in the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. LOCATION: South side of Ravenaux Drive approximately 500' west of the intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Blvd • OWNER/APPLICANT: Christian Men's Network CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • E. Willson and Robin Blackwood, 280 W. Highland, Southlake, in favor. "We do not wish to see construction of a tall fence on the north side of the property/south side of church construction. Not aesthetic and not necessary." P&Z ACTION: Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary 411 No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements addressed in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated June 13. 1997. City of Southlake,Texas Note that the purpose of this site plan is to request a variance to the six foot (6') fence along the south property line and the 315' portion of the east property line. Please be aware that the `F1' (six-foot) fence is not required by ordinance but was volunteered by the applicant during a previous site plan approval. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-053SP.WPD • • 7 18181 UVULSs 3.I I1VU&I tl DUV �pwlfORV Qo�'-;r D� . I - --- I v'. r 1 i I Ala P FM� `�(M-�B . wNEY A-nsa I. �` I IE u iv c- ^' \'r,?. 7 1 ��(({{(IA�'� PA nil ®�B1A r'�91 " •� - I VW C I�1 L ft J IfIA A I j ��11 Y A-1107 1BIC 1 I SURKY A-.k10 �_ ____J _ IF 2B1 ` ��EEE' 1dm4A a Ac ?. • 1, tLl IC. TA1.E N C 13.4 At v _I IBI BID _ 2 Ac 3.79 Pc A-{')D •�._ • Ia c• Eg • 13.77 Ac 9.03 Ac 4.3 Ac IB1 32-8 Ac r'- 28 ` r� • ,� i GG�{p • tE U # 1 I, IA 2B1A M1.-�✓r-- 14 i 3.85 Act 1Et DI = II2ACAc Ii i IM ( `tb1JEASt 40`�E St.2.15 11.87 j�2'�Ac , 1 ,- tet _7.36 Ac II 1 1 1`�A 1 j130 1A3= 183C - tB2 1B ._ _' --- _ _p 1 �� 6.2 Ac - 1A2A .. i i— e 1 i ' 1 1 i . __Lori I -- t __..-1 i I i IBSB .,pO 187 i tAtA `- I 1 I 1 i.J 1A1 . tl:LL1! lA S Ac 1p1�-- f i ,� CLc1Yn i 0(9 I 1 r{ ' ! ;,' 11.33 Ac 1 11y'' L. _;1�ya I i_._._._._._._.:._._ to t92 •?;f {J� IG 1 i IB Pj!` 2AI k I 1 P.cis,a.: 2A 5.9 Ac 1 M ' J. c�,�/�I�C� ��'• ' ,. .][_._._._._._._._.<.. VC/IEZ7 'c I 2 Kati-^2 _ i R1'FIFY A-Tl ._> ' stw\rr A-1620 N� O A. Sr' S v N7 N� .. Gait '1 687Ac r 2A2A 10 Ac E. kEtkLC 6F1 Plow d" I3EM H. 6HONGR 261 GIeV,1 — O. A A A 5 g,R1 Y A-300 ` NIP A 56.3:ac 2J I �A i „�., '\ i 11 i 6J 'TF 4 2F n 4.y ',� ' 2 3A2A 'ywr r r._.1._._:1:.• � j i 3A2B 4p . 8 i2Eti2E P 'Imi .U 2 y�i......rr 28 •ii ; I nA I i ''4) N I. 6J J\/ vT 1 O 382 38 381 I 0 x I l g5 ;' Ri- 3.15 Ac I{I I 3H —, zc2 .. --1NA '------ y ° cN► i ; wFvt 5.97 Ac ' 1`I 6DvnN. Airivy 4C2A AC2 3 3A 2A .---�� dF BF Y, 80 eD t..` 8C ® i 25.406 Ac -CS'�. 5 Ac �� t.3 Ac, ?.c= ' 1B 3EtA 3EtC '� :09 _ Dpl� ,D . i m 1�CIJ®PA A. • nn MO(s �r AR '\r i D acz ___ p i ICY A-� ` NEST HICI11.44 STREET' i EAsr ,CI L. (a eA �/� 8A 8A8A1 8D4 iEt 1 1F IB2 - IA !--- -- c 5.53 Ac III ,4A 8 BA SAn 'V: 5A ® 8 9 _ .;.._- 1 I .. 11E AE p ; A �1::4 . A _ .`..1 i A 4 9 BB2A •881A 9011.55003.OV' L QD 5 Ac • w .-p G` �' / I 1', 843 A 881C pI�.�G. .'f� �` .'Ri:6La Ac 1z Ml0 . 9A2 8A15 gA9 9F as, • i i i i • , 3819 i t1C2 9B j i 1 i I t , Iy• - i 11F ' i - I i i i i 1 - ��>t._. i r,D • �• i i 1��.J7�7� ,Y.1.a.uaw HALL p p 1 ,.{ ?T'`. \4` \° 1 I 1 1 4: ' ' ': , , _ 35 Ac �I_ \ t 1 .f ici i .st c .-l.� -dot\�5. t 1 ; .. 1 I i f i R 1 i 1 i I i i I I \ I i i avn.•, . r1 ,rA t o 4'I m 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I T T ) a ! l_ -.L r 1 1IIA2 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 - •; , i iiil .. IA2 VN �' a g - sass 1 ��•11 CC ; i ` 1 11 1 j ._. .-.a fi.1L471-1L-r-1.--•r SE j;/415 A 711' if yt. , .! i 1 1 1 I 1 ; ' _ t__ _i _- 1 r i t I . 1 I ' , I • x ,� TRACT MAP i ; i X' i i i ,tom \ _ }.i.l- rJ _ 34 .E _pE ._._. TR 6F 1., ) r)- 4.1 O TR 6G2 T �l� 9 1.04 O 6 1 11I, 111, +im me A . 6G 4` 128 0 10 TR 6H 2A "° _ t 2.0 0 z 11 COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH g = TR 6J x 5.72 O CS na ue 8 9 t t C. YOUNG C-1 2 4.8 �9 VILL en NA 40. rr" ma AO 114 VE • _ / W. LEE R 0-1 . EDWIN COLE MINISTRIES - r 1 •.970 0 / S—P-2 / •••••:" 0.0 1 E. BRYANT R il i M .n AG w M S O SOO �, I T.SEABORN 0 TR 8C1 Y g .49 AC x • m AG M.WOOLEY `� TR 8G AG ± :„ 1.5 AC „ las TR 8C3 1108F0 l» g 1.O AC g 4 TR 8D Q j 6.25 AC _ t., TR TR ADJACENT OWNERS "' 8D2 8D1 "` g AND ZONING TR TR 8G1 .82 .92 r= - H 4.08AC2 8C2A i II.5 AC II AC AC SPIN #11 ROGER HUTTON 1.0 AID • • • • . , INDICATION • •COY .°OT:OWT >v, w 1: ' .a wla«r.Ma.,n.•r....«..beT•T a..•••beta.„Tel,•., • 4 ela NOON N.•I•••wr•....«r.w.•,Art: •.•r.r•.r•«POI.01 MN.. YL ry^ BLOCK A et :•c.a.««,.'�•..•t I... Ilse Of.,.w.,..,«... oa. • LOT 7 Lora • .104 la WON. 12, . ..I `:1._.. ,��9�Fy 4 n..T. «o.•e.::.: « «w.•.the la.'v..a..of�:I.: ...or....••.al.,.« O .w •••S.Y1.-•41.-«•D et xiw«foot.•....«r••r.•Ia•`r«t %' .`l` 9�`� � y..'•-^* t••\•Ira r,w t.w n•T.•«, ••ti. Aor, v..I. tla:':O .. .0 . 2 j `t'.. `T •M TOGA .It.. «.w I•••• ace f• •... a 14.•.«e««r«.. . . I BLOCK B I NEWS S.2.-il.•-I.«•'.«•::•«r.•r•T.et•.T Let .,«... .1. ..•,.,!.. .... I LOT MI ,.�•" i,: nue• •. '0 ' ``•'''.30.. I m a. - ..•....„ ._.....•.4,�y,,\ I_ .e I•.o. •..•A, .....W.....« ---- • / ./ ' �.••^.0 ow Tumor,r.w ALL.n n T.......ON ..,...,.. wt.. ., .Ino.I..«••... •Tudbhlr. .r 4C®N1Yr I.••. • . •T Ike, •...• a_:. a-= - • bean i.. ...•4_ ttl CITY COUNCIL • TM':. el«1 t •••••' SOUTH LAKE TEXAS PLAT RE,PSIO.t T.»r Or.a •e« « ••••••.•l.Ot•to •••• r 0��^"" ((tom • LOTS 2R1 ANO 2R2,BLOCK B, PLANNING AND ZONING iktuf RAVENAUX VILLAGE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOT 2,BLOCK B. - ay!(^.4- aA _ OF RAVENAUX VILLAGE,AN ADDITION J. Sere..w.:w 07„«a r...«.•w„y«r..rr w.ttslm n`_- TO THE CITY OF SOUTH E T MHARRANT 1.le•..• �/e.7 /�,r,Gd ✓i• COUNTY.TEXAS.IN THE TM HOOD w••z/-/J_, . •"// m.o. SURVEY ABSTRACT NO.706,AS L• PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME •0'}O' 388-213.PAGE 31.PLAT RECORDS, •»• - - TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS. LK.. ,,,,,, k; 2 LOTS " 'v±w +I - 12626 ACRES w'e '• - ,>ie .�.. . YIn»-- NOVEMBER 1994 WARD�•� � T.AS PLAT FILED.NCAMMET_A--_...DC RO_5.0.1C •ON,w+.«,a -J C E)41 541n ?1a 4 • • • . MIIIIIMMINIMInomn a SITE PLAN APPLICATION / / J' . l� • IP '. .' CHRISTIAN MEWS NETWORK a ..�./ / O%\Vey Y �'• ' Integrity Development N Jim Halek / rave .T ...W ...•„» —-- g `.1\ Ravenaux Village a.«o.,000 / ,--;yy f,'VS �r An AOdI1M to the City a O , - ." Southlake ' !t Thom.Hood.•..'•y.AC•tr••t 1••.TOO C •,� %. /1 I'/ - \\\ '\.<!*�� Tarrant County, Texas • z:,;,i , t _ ♦�•r' July wee —_ .� S.ee Aw•• .�-'- '' Midim glik` :,��iir � - E.— \*: .ter 7" Flo ..... f D _ „ .Eli , D I \ � ._ NV, ;,, ... iiii '' Iv 'I r _■ � � �,--' Site Data Summary Chart ...._ i • �(t!. ' •.+. ••.• w.+.��rr•r W I Mon / 9 .I I ! l� -, MI01••• Z 0 X dc IF _ { C4 - ' 1 Law Ia.V. w.. m• CO ill VI 7" <r 4 ' 10 I> WO% WI MI um . r •I UM 101110 /' I 1 1 / / h••�•P.••..•Po**1 . a.m..•.••••r.a M••• ••■•••.A I 0 / I r7T"�_ 1 1 1 / 1 �� 1 I / / 77 , - -. /I 1 • / -N' h.■LL� to 1 , 1 ..s.• l•• Location Ma. General Notes l•r.• rsi I 1 1 '-' Nimil ` LT".....":1=—"........`1". ""'t:="`"."---•""" I •�,.�•,,,,^- ( J +' •" ��•,,^— )' •._ • 7 '•.....----.. AUG :'w IJ9li Silo Plan for apt .:.::::....•• 3 u. ."••'...rr a . r r .wr.... 1 ��, Zoning for Christian "� I 1 .1 J tlen's Network ..,.... ., nnrip .--9 I I M Peer City of South lake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 97-053 Review No: Two Date of Review: 6/13/97 Project Name: Site Plan - Lot 2R1, Block B. Ravenaux Village being 3.97 acres situated in the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Christian Men's Network Arch Tech Limited 1001 Euless Blvd.. Suite 104 2935 Everest Lane North Euless. Texas 76040 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone: (817) 283-2898 Phone: (612) 476-4133 Fax: (817) 685-9625 Fax: (612) 404-9317 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. ,:,;, f ............ ...................:.. :............. .lid•... Note that the purpose of this site plan is to request a variance to the six foot (6') fence along the south property line and the 315' portion of the east property line. Please be aware that the `FI' (six-foot) fence is not required by ordinance, but was volunteered by the applicant during a revious site plan approval. * It should be noted that this proposed use shall comply with the development regulations set forth in the "CS" district, except as otherwise noted. 1. Move the proposed extension of Countryside (Ravenaux) Drive farther west to ensure appropriate access to Lot 2R2, Block B, Ravenaux Village. Consult with Staff regarding the geometry of the new cul-de-sac and right-of-way. Construction of this extension should be completed prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Phase I building. * All fire lanes and curb radii dimensions must be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to construction. * All construction must be in compliance with the Masonry Ordinance No. 557 which requires eighty percent (80%) masonry material or glass on all exterior facades. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * No review of the landscaping is intended with this Site Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ordinance No. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. I i City of Southlake,Texas A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit for any future phases, a revised site plan must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the case reference in the lower right corner to read "Case No. ZA 97-053". * The applicant should be aware that if tabled, any new submittals that may be required for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Christian Men's Network ArchTech, Ltd. Integrity Development, Att: Jim Halek, 14869 Manitou Road, Prior Lake, MN. 55372 L:\W P-FILES\RE V\97\97053SP2.W PD • • • , 0 • • r .� SITE PLAN APPLICATION "' for fi=.."""a-:».•m Par ," CHRISTIAN MEN'S NETWORK ; ,, ,�ate:..... •....- ,' O1Vde/ Integrity Development 'W.A. ,• nOr. 1.•1 tat�«• Jim Hotel( / fk`�e ♦$ IN Village W.:. .... .., ...1n ' i--r/ - • .e.••f••,•.f• •`- A.A./b.V IM Can M �� /` " .•.•I••� ••• ' Southlake ' •• r_-._ssi_ - • T•.Pr.11.•...r.qt.AMIr•W M.7'O. ...-' // .r.,, /; ►•��.•• , / •�vAIv`•, Tarrant County. T..0 w•-- :❖, .` •�•• 16�' --- •'.. Sib Plan for SP1 Zoning for Christian M.n'a Network �""�+"�' •❖. t�� l- �� R.qu.st for Varlanc. to Dsl•l. Requk.mont for 0'-O' HIBh t ►••. 1 •� f Fancs Along South and Pwllon of Eul Property Llns II ❖.. it I •�' .i e- fde ts �' I \ •. j -�"i.. r r w"T..Z..r• wr�.•",a.".-..."r.r"�� z r'r..•'- ►••.•!' •. ' , ,.war - tv. wM.l'wow I.Wag OlOill ••if I • ,,,m,...72WP.,1 -MID I •eb I ki4 ,�'', ' `�;•� Sits Data Summary Chart Cl) 0 ' ►.• ,� r72 ::` � / 'i/� ,' .lei• .'�.rw ... �. tr.....- M ;... ` cc co- , I •. '•?•� / .� Y ley' // ''/''/ �•••�-' .-...... N .Y Parr Snear O. 4 ►❖. I fi: ; '•❖. Wil ogee Jim*Yowl .Parr-.rWOO a& 04.00/ea ».. r = `:4CI1 ' i-r- �'_ 4 /1 •''' *Ag41 ,.o o w. .. . ..., Q 1 6 IY •••• / / / f::: /' •�•• Y NAM M • war w �i•. / I I t'.>.:_ >:<�.' .O w P Para.. . ...Y M. o / ♦. / •❖.� Z W ►iii i r rti r i ! .. LLy .l 1 , / / I ►.•••.. ..r,.�r• •.'" •..•r war.. P.�.. •./�. r.Y T ►...: I' I i , / /, , '' ►�!.i!f ~ w..� •~i H Y�i w lei O .•••.' �11_� t ,, •''' •.�.•� r..aV — w+• w w Moo t/��' ►❖.•I .�.1 / / +--' — ' •I.'••••• —M .a-t... tin wn tole ono �I U -I ►❖A wl.t / , `� ►!•1.�1 .....+w•err I t ...ram wr.r r w r r.+..r+r •♦ ,' • •P. .Par tr.r t--.-./arw w•�- ��^'fi t` , / - .4.� Q • • - --• 1. I••••, I4 �: • Location Ma General Notes ::. �� ❖•. `Yr ' ; i I - ' - '- - , - - %KA . ................Y........+•••=.t.nor..r...• % ► .:41KV'•+,:•i❖e�0i❖.•i i❖••c°i i❖44.•❖•OW•••i•i'.,••i4••4i0•••.Ole 4 i•!�•.• • =I t=wr*.YSSL'L t 1=rermi===C.:'" /� •........•C.•...•.••...t..••.••..•.•••..•.•.•......vat.• ..-tar w.+r-r.'.....-.. _` Y �s>_ .�_►••••.:4 r e►❖..►❖....••••❖.•..a/••❖.❖.•..•••••..❖.❖.•0.V.V.V. •••r11•••► • •rr r w r r...WI•.r.�a ae.r. ,\�1 �._"�y' w• • ••*me Om..el-r a...-r ram••.aa+.• ( •� ,.... ! • ,. w / • .,.,.,.1•=.1:a...614,•r,.,SWAM WY.saw••••• Sit. Plan for SPt 11 7 ": . II tom.-.....�..r«r..•w.....t-.rr Zoning for Christian.'let. ! a , .......jr 1 • M.ns Network _ S'fCS.:�TOC�x'L��sCM--• �at� 40 I Site Plan sari.: r.ao'-0 I lerLeort . KO!lh -- �0 25' 50' 75'1 100' of.. ;; WI Ix S i lk gE at sz 3 33 I i [ 3 . o -m mai I 9 9m _� T m Ii A n �i■ ! n 1 rk s,Y ... ,I.:-„:- Ski'/ � I r II .: r=■■ ■,■ = I ft en 'tii,i' ■■■ -_- { III. a -111A LW/ 1 Illeil Will 1-7 . �� 1 I .ffill .... min :____ Ill ii Elm ["0 -- i S ;, il 1. ,.. 101 --...-E:F. I 1 1 . IN igi; 11 III .-_-ion NI 4 ■■■� im..■■■, jplLi :■wino.�! Ft 1 U Ft Fi - �' s ; s _ I` S .o S: IF q -3 m it j Ill =i _} __n 9-2—vs..3 7--) ii--)? 2 21997 C; 1 Till N CHRISTIAN MEN'S ' i '_' 'i Fi oQ NETWORK 4 °` I 0kli SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ;tr i:l • City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-054 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Georgetown Park, Phase II STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.058 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately 700' east of the intersection of South Kimball Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. • APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • G.M. Nettleton, 2611 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, in favor. • Roy Lee, 2620 E. Southlake Blvd, Southlake, in favor. "This is quality building and should be an asset to the neighborhood." • Howard Carr, 311 S. Kimball Ave., Southlake, in favor: "Provided the builder installs a wooden fence along the west property line similar to the one already built on the (north) west property line." • City of Southlake,Texas P&Z ACTION: June 5, 1997; Approved(5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary • No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendment: 1) accepting articulation as proposed. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 30, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-054SP.W PD • • - , ,::A uj:w . x :: r 1,4 C.-!'t.......__...• . . . z J 12G I P.'a . . :A-, 1 AANNA 5.75 Ac 505°22A 5828 ma ...--:: 5C16 xi, av 8D ,X „• __,....c's• /4 . .,..s•sss• I 2A4 5.75 Ac Mig / ....., . 1 ' .-••••.. . '-'5C1621 " , 52 S4,1°11 aism r .1 (- .-.._ .- Nem :"87-; pOW It - 7::. -.• —.r _ ,.. , IF- -4.- -r 2 .„;....• ,-5h9--.. 4> . II I 3A 3, '..... 3 . OS 80 Er" • QIII.JIN.A"... sliii. :2: . n 411111k Da .... ,..., -, 5C1 5of. ii\ .:: '4. • .4.± ._. Z. 111a - , 384 MI .1.4, 11, 11 -ItA0 .......-'''.......-' : 51til ......... -I ""r• -...- ADD -:-: --r 5°1 110. P. ..,11F I I=Mial Mid** lb.- .-. CM • -WY A-5 2B4A :eci ...... . .- .' r••-•" THOM/13-4,HAN 1 4 5A4 ,.--• , 2331 2811 286 287 2812r:12A 286 - • -3 ...., ..-"*. 5 29 r.i.1 i.c• ....... 282 28 293 285 21 \ •, .- \ 2A .- 5- -sat - 'UMW 20 2G 2C 289 2L 2N 25 3:0 1294 2P, e . F . .-. . 11 2.81A 2C1 5C1 5p.. - -----•• .... 3A2 'ilipPill • o --\ ..•lifiri , . - • .,........ _...i. of,Aiiil 2K Ey al 2E 20 2/2 Z11 N. • .,xxf , ,.....•----•-• ..-..ffl •-•1 --Ii 5-. . '„ im il igt^ 2A 1 ..,-' i :2D-, :GF. .itif.g- . eNtit ---1 -- 582 ,- I-- 1 •-- . . INIC:P11111110:4 .CO.Y.:: _. 2A2 -",411N 007 Iri : 1 582E1 5132A Tw"I A NORTHWEST PKWY EAST 1B 182 1 kf.'., IrrCil 4 . 5A B 3 1 ,A ...,... 2A1 1." IgiZAR i 1 i ': 'gAg IA •S -...... I I/f li„„,..- i i ....f• - -1 -..L1STP.PLACE - API7rf °1‘1 A 1709) 2A2, A r 0 6trz•EAS1'SCUD-BAKE BLVD. s'r`d •:3 ,th., --•...,?, 1 - ! 01•41f • . •,, .1,6'1. __ I i BU !It i ; : ; i1 ; iI 7A X 2 28 182, 182 1E1 • , , 1 . •Ill _31---'1— c.. ' 1628 C-1? tAlix - • th...,-414 —• _-i — _,,,,,,..... 1 r ..-.-',• NOON ._. _._ 15 Ac "------ -0 i1.h.ggi .. 55 ,...,c, ....., 4.,,,,, • A r i jri : ''''... [ 2 1 18i 6A1A1 2019 3 3E 3C • . 2 1 ' 11\ITI ---- 2 2A2A A1 A I 3 Ac • VD litipp. - _.........^1 ''.7'... I ADP ......."".. „._.1 2A I ..--- --...:-•••••••••"..... '........ 1111111 1 i I 1 i ‘,IC 2A3A 2 14 --- ,1._. ..,- Allir __._._._. •-•-•-•• j . p ........• I 2.09 Ac \ ' r... 11A 118 1... '5 , , c . ! ! ! ! ! j \ •10' ........- , allhil' tt-tt-71-'T "°../ ''..,--------- ID i EL• -T . ly . ..— ,..-. Z ,15.e._0:1 , -.-.-.- '',,k• i . ! :1(0)1jt N i ili i F 3A LA 414 17_EtAil rN1 '' ----- i •;. I ,i•• SLRLE' A-171 !. ! __ ._. : i i i i ii i 1 irrS / 3° • --.-.. --.-6iev_i..m11.4545 % 110 c. 3 3B .--• .---- ••-- •A 1 i i 1 .%. t i v— to( ---- ---- ... •:y 6,...- 6E1 4A4 1 , i LI 1181 .._.-.-- .% t . 51,057 ! I I i i. ED 4 — i I1D5A1 in.....'. iii1 1A3 --- f. 10 20 Ac i 1104 iiii 1 (.... - '.---1 1 1 I 383 3 . . GRAPEVINE CITY UMI r 7i• vq.. HALE) -- , , , i , 3 Ac •.- A-803 5A1 i:1 6.15 Ac 1---- --' NAINBcm Sr. :1 E •*". ..- . A2A 2A 28 .. 2C1 .•* I II 1.55 e 1A2C 1A2 683 68 681 IA 11: 1 2C at 10591 ‘ \ elg55N ... --- A v.-----„- 1AL usIg Ac .10 A;'• 114 Ac 682 'd — 1 ‘ ovi- 61 Ac I \ \ rn Irl C) TRACT MAP Ai!:-- • - rfA6 .-1''' . ! ...____,______,___..._._._._...._... 1 !1•451z .6111k . . _._ IA 1_11 .12:!z-ful.:/ 2F1 I IA ' 2-W-3--BBCO ,PA t-- \\ I i T e 41, 184K al ,,,,,, r,9., 18106 .\\:\ It...... 1 6.3 Ac I . '- -•"P ,e.,.z Tr747186C1 ,..-'' c 15.5 Ac i , '% •-•8 ' .,‘},j1,7-.1' TR 6A1 2 151 O 2 r------_ eiAIW ——„ i TR 6 1 _ r' TR o R o I TR 2C M "' _'^_ .t---- -- - �.,L — CA KI?0LI ss AC , *RAPEVINE— OLI TR 2B1 1011 p 7 , - TR 2B RRI 7 .1 .7�479 AC I Cr' S S ,� fit,\ fgE 65 r1flTR2E1I 1 8 -,____ 2osol k. U � `c� 1.1 8 is2 in :15 ,7 - 7- _____________L______,_ .1bil ,2'424 I I q ^I 13 . • . N Mill* .. TR 2A 1 5.73 AC I IIII 1 1 ,.. ._ la • 1 jT \- l bill , 1 1 ' iz ' a 1 I . - 1 GEORGETOWN PARK ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING I 30-May-97 ClSkantaiimst CAVALLINO PROPERTIES LTD, 02 TFYAC,STATE OF C2 '� I 03 I LIBERTY BANK C2 I 04 TEXAS,STATE OF C2 ADJACENT OWNERS 05 EATON,RAREFY E 6 CHARLOTTE J AG . C6 TEXAS,STATE OF AG L ,,07 TEXAS,STATE OF AG A N D ZONING 09 TEXAS,STATE OF AG 09 NETTLETON,G M AG SPIN u ^( 10 SOUTHLAKE,CITY OF CS 1r7 DA RREL,L r`-,V'LIr' 11 WILLIAMS,ROGER GLENN AG S I- 12 JAMES,ANDREW L JR SF-1A 13 CARR,HOWARD E JR AG 14 CO2;LLC C3 15 SOUTHLAKE KIMBALL VENTURE LTD C3 ----___En_______________________________ 10 TEXAS,STATE OF C2 '7 GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS C2 7 _ • • • • ..... NO.1'IiS SITE DATA ^� APPLICANT:LICAN: OWNER CONSULTANTS& MY PLAN VJ ...�, w .....<,...,-. :.1 a.;: .:w "' GEORGE TOWN PARK _�« M.,....,,.......,.-, LOT I AND LOT 2 SOUD. ., SITE PLAN w• . . JOH Fero, y..,,.. "',•Sr. o, ('{ «.+«-••..,o >:..e ..vr+..+`y.+¢-+a�..r..i.•.>•....1. PREPARATION TARRANL CO.TEXAS A {(2 .�tvw.•.y..... PRFPNUTKKI DATE,O//q.% .,., ,.. D SLLNG ZONED'C-2 PROPOSED ZONING,C-2 -6 «..a._r.ea �. —TY Pon MA ll 40•420 LAND USE DESM,NATgM MIXED e /WW ,�.., ,u..w.. - -1ria --- S. O LEGAL DESCRIPTION lI. I _ ✓.. t i l i=I ! �. ! SITE DATA 1 AaNA ACC. F. C�n/� webat aes`' `4 ,,N ;- _ _ - �- _ -1-.. • - ., ;.,1.0f 1 FOR NAY T I- T..''.4. ': •....>...,.,........,.... i- I'•'w I — ...._...... - .. ww.eow •.,«. ,w.n omrae MR., ..ox n.a- 'n.,sw•e y /( N IFF wv,...,•w,w...,t.. a _ ... .My,y __—.. _— -- 1 ..cas.c.rs sus.r.es ...e, ! .sce AMU. 1016 It _ ar.css• la* as.ew. cv.,cs saw. _ AY to ,w.-.aw.,we-.,sss,..sr,.s -ir«v ovn w s.«arw — __—__-- a_ _•___- -_-__-__..oas so.,.. I (PRICYsi �'. , .-,..m"rrn:i-__-----__. ' t..o w...ss..r....1m [- �aw...s acwee..a ,-, gllart w 11Mill m a.a......s ,r g r X LOT I-PRASE 11 FUTURE:LrT!E; 74' jyl ;l /, // • �. _ - 11,17:" ..' ( F .,em �. .r-1--s4i {t tiyi�' a..o.ssu•scw..>.....Qo (Q••�tun w.tc,.,•rrc.tu.apr../ Q ! !:! ; a N.1 .i1 . 1 I L-.w . I.4.1Y!,i,i II I 1 _/1b �f-. $ / / /, CDr �M rt 8 ..a<,,, a. r --: ...::tomD _, moos mo.o I a Y I ira` b��r's�ves I I . 'I I ! II' - - • T ! ' '11 , I . I J.p ! I Sid -S � �` ..� /1. 'ers , - sown -It--/' •9.4 / , ...se�,k...e,.,swss.. *A •• L a ro c, i I LOT 2 FUTURE DEVFI.OR,LL•NT 'v li w..0 41 ,k s Y. . . 1 ' ; .../.:..".,_''',.!,.l.:T.:1,12,1..-: NO ..1. .: :::.....w .... � ....... I AUG 46-�( .. ' .....v.-,>..,...... ; ..:..b %i ,. L;L� sujr ` �1 s»'w City of South lake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Illase No.: ZA 97-054 Review No: One Date of Review: 5/30/97 Project Name: Revised Site Plan - Georgetown Park Phase II being_1.38 acres of Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Realty Capital Corporation CnK Associates Inc. 2425 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 150 2045 N. Highway No. 360. Suite 160 Southlake, Texas 76092 Grand Prairie, Texas 75050 Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 640-0100 Fax: (817) 488-5257 Fax: (817) 633-3309 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/28/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. Correct the graphic scale to match the written scale of 1" = 40'. 2. Change the title to read: "Revised Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park." •. Label the metes and bounds on the common property boundary between Lots 1 and 2. 4. Provide the Bufferyard and Interior Landscaping Summary Charts on the plan. Provide the following general note to the bufferyard chart: "Plantings of all canopy trees on the site shall be a mixture of 50%two-inch (2")caliper and 50% four-inch (4') caliper minimum size." Show and label the width and type of proposed bufferyard along the east property line on the graphic. Distinguish the bufferyard areas with dashed lines and cross hatch or shading. 5. Label all entrances and exits to buildings. 6. Dimension the distance from building to property lines. 7. Show the location, orientation, type and height of any intended lighting, signs, and exterior auditory devices. 8. Label both required fifteen-foot (15') side building lines. 9. Show, label, and dimension utility, drainage and common access easements on or adjacent to the site. 10. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant. •1. Show the location of any proposed hydrants. rI - City of Southlake,Texas 12. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc.. 13. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 14. Provide a summary chart showing all proposed variances (i.e., bufferyards, screening, etc.) to the "C-2" zoning district regulations and/or Corridor Overlay Zone requirements. This should show the referenced zoning district, the existing requirements and the proposed variance. 15. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/9/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA97-054" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that only one monument sign and one attached sign per street frontage is allowed on the site. Any deviation will require a variance approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a permit. * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 12' from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills greater than 4 inches within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. * the applicant should be aware that is a more intensive professional use such as a medical/dental office is placed within the site the required parking will increase and that prior to receiving a C.O. for any building space all required parking must be in place. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee. Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. i .. City of Southlake,Texas * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. • All mechanical units and satellite dishes must be fully screened of view form F.M. 1709 and from properties within 400' having residential zoning or a low or medium density residential Land Use Designation. Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Realty Capital Corporation CnK Associates Inc. L:\W P-FILES\RE V\97\97054 S P I.W PD • iJ S City of Southlake,Texas Articulation Evaluation No.! Case No. ZA 97-054 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97 evations for Georgetown Park Ph. II, Lot 1, Block 1 of Georgetown Park •ived 4/28/97 Front- facing: North Wall ht. = 25 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 75 16 -79% Yes 75 22 -71% Yes Min. artic. offset 4 4 0% Yes 4 4 0% Yes Min. artic. length 4 14 250% Yes 6 12 100% Yes Rear- facing South Wall ht. = 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length { : " t ..:? 34 "1 °.a t.�: 7!:;3't14:214',iVt:-:14014:7-ifff°:•:7;7— :` to- Min. artic. offset 2 4 100% Yes 2 9 350% Yes Min. artic. length 9 23 156% Yes 9 23 156% Yes Right- facing: West Wall ht. = 21 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 63 26 -59% Yes 63 26 -59% Yes Min. artic. offset `ch 5,.; W ..2 33° = .�° 3 8 167% Yes .._-as 'k +...c.»9� ... Min. artic. length 4 6 50% Yes 4 6 50% Yes •- facing: East Wall ht. = 21 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 63 20 -68% Yes 63 26 -59% Yes Min. artic. offset .3 < 2 '' -33% , 'No 3 8 167% Yes Min. artic. length 5 6 20% Yes 4 6 50% Yes S • • • • • .. ,__ _ . _ ____ ....... ..................... 11 -6.,, ___ ..... ....._ _......,...24:1;•- ='.=... t_-2. ..... ,r sn E DATA �""•� `ffi' -- - - REVISED srre PtwN FOR .—r G GI TOWN oral TARRANT la "'CO.TEXAS �, ...,r.c•i ^' •�.^6:s�e - - ••- - ` 'h-...uiL - a LkNOEYJSI USE C ZONED C-2PROPOSED ZONING:C- Ca AM / 1111411111111 ' alai i � • Phi _ . Wu. 1? O. r - II LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSULTANTS& 1 �p{y "!• ;; tp� _ f PPPP��PPtr ; .ii iI _ S at®iti- -, i i ,�3iflY a s ,.11 s it 1.,1�1t�l JE9=•'• --.0,..,a I - _1011 I ..r.e.r yw_.....eww.nw..wv.....w .wl.r.syY p _... 6HI 1H a r..w uv.•r_...w.�... vwrM •• fA®l 6�dQ/ 4 CaMwuf .�.''.......sr .w..w rs..r...��rw.rw.... w.:.r.w..an ....rrr...... .r. w r ,„�..✓wwr..w. ..."*".-...rvm..w.. r�.ow.w•rcwre .wa rr ...•r •.a n N �.w .. .v...._•'.. ow NOTES _ —� - �,...�.r.— w..ww. 'EOM �p4�' Q \ryl"'1:1 . t c utyll vavrn_.ny � . r - o- . w . — • •0 law m ' , A ®+ u i: : h � i ' �� ! 7.' :" .>, : . .m. �•s, �:w �'"'"��...� .........," :._.... . i a a m I ,uur .::::in: `a ,„, irt • � . .._._.....�,":. .- • - tffGIS^mi. I aaw ar.ru.• RE ED SI/&PLAN _- l �_ r v 1000 f1201 j • i ) ..a.....03101. • . 4 ._., - it ;,�' jl .aw. ... A • -1 Lwr .'.P.` ._ , i/7�� /•l .wo ur•n.w..w...rn ..w�.e n.w.r.w.w om IIr -.t- 1 PHASE 1 / ;, , li.-c__ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _ __...1.: T, - -, 1-___-11„,:.. .-:LI.::.,..;,.._ i . /14 I Ni f� ' n. NOM ..,o..e n....tl I .wo..re n«.«.r......eo 0110010.10 ' .worr n..w.w...m, LOT 2 FVIVRii DLVFLOPMNxr 1/44 , ..w..n.w....n..c 11 • / /1 • • i am __ 3j 'REC'D JUN 10 1997 - A� .___.--_____.. MA OILIS .r..... vafir VOW MO WPM al•ILO / .^•"•.. . se in �..r 000b I • A—I City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT June 13, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-058 PROJECT: Site Plan - Southlake Oaks, Phase II STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan of Southlake Oaks, Phase II on property legally described as Lot 2. Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. and being approximately 1.8685 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard and approximately 410' east of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). • OWNER/APPLICANT: 1709 Southlake Oaks, Ltd. CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 5. 1997; Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the following amendments: 1) delete requirement#l a(minimum spacing of 250' as required by the driveway ordinance); 2) delete requirement #1b (required throat depth of 100 feet); 3) amend requirement #9 (forty-foot (40') rear setback line) to allow as shown; 4) re-state that the out parcels are not included in this site plan • approval. City of Southlake,Texas S STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 30, 1997, with the exception of those requirements in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated June 13, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-058SP.WPD S S -11?-z J I ,_._.W.J y•y •••-SURSEY A- •.I I r1- I II lI I I I•LST hlGr#.a•.f =,- I JL_ _ .. ___- ® .A EA 8A 2All EAtE BA 8A8A1 m g i,8811 1111 5.53 Ac He 8A4 AA 8 13A5 SA q 6 265 11E IIE BAIT A ; �' 1 ge [...-,I �' p 4 P,B2A} a61A 5o� �MaLY cE_- --- BAS ill Pbtr J A or GO .T�.6a A. `.. BA2 BATS BA9 5A •,•1 ! i i i i ! IIiii 9A Bala • I _ it BAI ,- 1 i- i r - i I- C2 111C:A 11C2 98 iD ii W- •' i I 1 I 1 ' I. I .\ T ,1 I I i i I - - ��y. i _ e •,ram ` l•.\o i I I I4. -i , i NALL� _p+� i •\ ` it •-A V IItA,.i�l: __ -,-. i i B i i � 35 Ac ��AS 14 i •i i r II • L,.1 \ I i I 1 '\, ' � 1 I l■/ a N I 1 1,CR \,v • '.L.r-TL'_r,1 ' i i i 1 i i 1 ! 1 IA A simumnil T•i ...i .,. ? IjJ.� '-T iiimirimmusgs 1. ` _: •.^\ _I J' "\ \•J:L<M♦ -'-'1 --�'- i ,rtb-1 1 .-g, ;• 1 ! i /-•\ •`\, .\ ,. Y T i ! }.�• _ i i %a; \ C i i, h1 , i -'# 0A --F-'- —. i i i '\ iI i --.1-- .. ..... i ; \ Ar; _. �` �,r(}.iL/' i I __ - i _+- --F-' -3, i i i }-..i.1._�'.. e.'5 i • • s • `�-i-i., • \�.Q._. I C ! \\. ._.�r..,., w.�� _ i i I ! ,yy - `T'_.T._._t.-._- e: \u. - \ I i \ ?..A, i \- ZC i I I t' i . . \1_• _ \ \ aa,! k ,Y ►tv_. Z.ucln3)._.4 - -. 3A1A NNiAL ; ; i f Li T LI=R f �r..,/�- -mAL N� ; ; i f 1 i i i i • i i i a % II i i I i i ` V 1 I • PA I i i i \ ! i 1 i i 1.�, i i i . . 381 \EY A-666 i % ''.1 y 1..( � • }JIA 3N -•riul X.-I[ }s,8 x/• ,Gig'! ! ! L_ ja3 .,.'...., / -4-...j 3 i , I i • " .-.-. '1, ILI 5... ii PPrr - r� �' *EST TNLAKE BLP , ( !�•ii "..RC y�y�_�,r. r�o -- _^ ___ -- r 3C Al 5, 1 S*I R 58 SDI -`- 0 Ili ., 3C2 .. 03 �.' ;�. '� ,� _ a ,� igi.el ,p�L 19 10 Ac 5 Ac 17.2.19..43 Ac 4.5'1 • • •M.` s` • _ 1--.. -LT• 1. �1'\, 1 �-' is A< 58 - �'�'`. r .-_;1--` 'W I -' '>.' �.''�x' • err _. _.� ,'�._. \i .-: 3( • \ --- - - , CI /ill iffil ...... • A` \ ./ �`'_ ` d if,, pi III'pl.'--k \ . �_._ _ ' - ,`1'h�j q. `. .% 7 !•A 'A Iv' �•mrc\n; 1 -. ._ ` ! .�r..r' "�'-.ui !I! 1 }c -(ATE'.P1 ME._,..T E.. O. ri. . . AG i - •)_.• .rn.-a. 1 -' -I C. r,. 1F I = I i I'•`• [6}A CP � . . .�4i p)� (- 5 A -um 48 W. 4: aUA' o- ,,` a _ } • ,� • i_. as I rs�_ 7,' ® 2C :::1� 2C2A 2rtA- er. �i • • • • • �1 BULL �iy,�1�N �Np'45 Ac , «5• -' 1i Ay,...0"I•l'l"itI., e,.. M (� �/� �p , •7 . �` j YANG ^ it YUI i i \ SURIEY A-5d1 i 1 .. ' •,•.• . ,.I...A...ali'''.•' .-. i 1 •i 1I 1I II F. 1 . LY 111-1Y.' . J J!J< LLff 1 I 4 Ac -. ' -t ` ,\ 1 I- Ri i INC TO PAR. 1 ° .— .I r I jj •..`� - 1 / 1, �1 � J I�. �I •11'lY.l:'il L 1 �ill T. ® — __ ` _Leg , _ TRACT MAP I•Ir. l; 1 � 1 ply , . _ BEAU r \ ` _ ` ` TR 3C1 • TR 301A • 10.80 AC a 11.140 i • TR R 9.9 33 w ,,, C .10 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TR 3C AG i TR 30 G. iB 1 4.2758 ® • I ii. 31[, S O AC / Tr 3.2842 0 3D4 ,14 TR 3D5 1.3538 0 - 8 0 — C-2 ��TT R"38 ,•.• , •., TR 3C2 3D4 C_2 110�p1 TR 1 �8 AC .88 O o O , .,... .. Ji INN 1S 9.90 FM 1709 SHADY OAKS LMTD. r7 = S FM 1709 SHADY OAKS LMTD. - - _ _ - _ - _ STATE OF TEXAS �- _ _ _ _ _ - / / STATE OF TEXAS n » \ TR 2C1 R r x 2A1 TR 281 .182 0 =„ ` n ta ".�gR TR.3C2 4? 20 TR 20� H DBgRRY��; _ i C-2 �� .548 Ac .067 o � 05 C 2 3y'. w n. )J TR 3A1 t- n. E 21 g. • ® GCOMMOREEN/ .107 L. CONNER 25 0 3' 66 / CC ,x .908 O No 1/ 81 U Y to .491/O • n7 ,aS / 22 i 2 C-2 " /. ,x ' TR 2C t, ' 3 �" 23 l 1 2.96 AC " n LAKECREST HOMEOWNERS `in ('J , . • 24 �� bo 21 � '' ' 4 C if. I i• 5 R. REUTLINGER • 25 . 1 . 20 . 1 M 1 1 19 • "° 0* l 24 - ADJACENT OWNERS i '" 18 AND ZONING / 19 27 "I , ,� Z 1`7• ISO SPIN #13 JIM GOGGIN 71 19 g • <1-2/ .ao }� TR �N? .1 • T� Z♦ 1111,11, S'Xb'O �'7HLQOS y� !10 x 1.IOj a aa' i9 ' � g lliiiii' i, JU UJdojanaQ Ue[d. air, r4 H l a I: .� 1 , 1 Q b off •.3 O) ;1 .� Tr - W,.O o iM:.s .� R oJft= °� '< = 7 ¢- a_Yi fief a a `" --1--J %' 91 ' a a T •Ii! i 9: ;I 1 i -T a- �i ._, . -6 Y h.0.._ S1 L, ice.-'^.... , I U i ..... vJ ..4 Vg. • ilE- i 44 I . . d .. " 7.....:.. ... no. • ma's • -<. �. Lt., 'i _ '! l.li•'!r t.•a 8 o_ u , n _. _., - - \\\\ .H ,[ r ate—zia I \v .. W N N. `7 .t : , 1. -••..i • ::-•t:--4-.!- • , 1 I • .... "y 1 _ ® --•- 7.. • • _ Iif t ' 11141 figJJ v .d' •,• sit 31 •.f�t 15(` r L 1 3 • `.,• -. ..,, P. idt < 1 di...,.r a ;i. _A t v.- _ ••R-' : -�,e (yam i _ y[• �s r I�� _ •••'. (11111 .1.1111 > ..i I I. , ` • . V • • t xi .._ •. - ; , I •-- \I - ; ;.-•, - ,:.- .._ - �••'.1 '\ ► -{! `•.. fit, ' •'.' �� .— ' _ �1_I—�_ iris 1 ;\ i 1r�••• t•` —� /-... .:..,_,, _ ,� r l , T mac. a • • . ••AK DRiv .... —-- _ A.. it • . 3(ii w Y ' i 3 t: -11� Ill 2 3131 l ii 3 4 t • i .sus § :. glIp bb gt k.' I1C i _ 7 City of Southlake, Texas 0 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 97-058 Review No: Two Date of Review,: 6/13/97 Project Name: Site Plan - Southlake Oaks Phase II being 1.87 acres located in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: 1709 Southlake Oaks Limited James. Harwick& Partners, Inc. 16800 Dallas Parkway, Suite 150 8340 Meadow Road, Suite 248 Dallas,Texas 75248 Dallas, Texas 75231 Phone: (972) 250-0008 Phone: (214) 363-5687 Fax: (972) 250-1950 Fax: (214) 363-9563 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/9/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 787. ;7�1�'t/�;G:. /r.:., •`.;;2.gw.,..: .vr?L:;£%'r7k:...+.•mem:•::::.::f:;.;raj.:,r,.ix:t: .::::::::...:::!.cC•:'::ax•':::::::::::..g.,.,:..:.::::.::::::.:.r,..::.f:::::::.•::::::: * The scope of this application and review is the commercial/retail building, its elevations and the two driveways shown on the plan. The applicant understands that a revised site plan will be required when a specific user has been determined for the easternmost portion of Lot 2. • 1. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. The location of the easternmost drive is approximately 195' from the centerline of the park access drive. This does not meet the minimum spacing of 250' as required by the driveway ordinance. (P&Z recommendation: delete this item) b. Both the existing drive in the southwest corner and the additional proposed drive in the southeast corner do not meet the required throat depth of 100 feet. (Both are approximate 38').(P&Z recommendation: delete this item) c. The easternmost proposed limited access drive does not appear to meet geometric designs required by the city. 2. Remove or relocate the parking spaces on the west side of the building because "all parking spaces required shall be located on the same lot with the building or use served." (§ 35.2) (Note that the applicant is apparently proposing to relocate the lot line to alleviate this situation.) 3. Although the bufferyard chart shows intentions to provide the required bufferyards, the notes suggest that a variance to these requirements is requested. Please clarify desires regarding bufferyards. (Note that the applicant is apparently proposing a temporary bufferyard off-site along the easternmost edge of pavement.) Correct the west required bufferyard to 5' - Type A. Note that there are several (5) incorrect calculations of plant material requirements (all in favor of the city) in the bufferyard chart. 7 f -C4 City of Southlake, Texas 4. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a • mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. This may require additional shrubs over and above those required within the adjacent bufferyard. 5. A forty-foot (40') rear setback line is required by the Corridor Overlay Zone (Section 43.11). It appears that the applicant is seeking a variance to this requirement. (P&Z recommendation: Amend requirement to allow as shown). 6. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant. Show the location of any proposed hydrants. Other Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations: 1. Re-state that the out parcels are not included in this site plan approval. * Note that City Council has previously determined that the exterior finish proposed here met the masonry requirements of the corridor overlay zone. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting if tabled must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 6/23/97. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. III No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate buildingpermit is required pq prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that only one monument sign and one attached sign per street frontage is allowed on the site. Any deviation will require a variance approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a permit. * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 12' from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills greater than 4 inches within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. * The applicant should be aware that is a more intensive professional use such as a medical/dental office is placed within the site the required parking will increase and that prior to receiving a C.O. for any building space all required parking must be in place. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. All mechanical units and satellite dishes must be fully screened of view form F.M. 1709 and from properties within 400' having residential zoning or a low or medium density residential Land Use Designation. 7!f' 7 City of Southlake,Texas * Denotes Informational Comment et: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: 1709 Southlake Oaks Limited James, Harwick & Partners, Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97058SP2.WPD O 1 • 7/�-8 Articulation Evaluation No.! Case No. ZA 97-058 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97 . vations for Southlake Oaks Ph. II, Lot 2, Block 1 of 1709 Southlake Oaks ived 4/28/97 Front- facing: South Wall ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 60 50 -17% Yes 60 19 -68% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 13 16 23% Yes 5 13 160% Yes Rear- facing North Wall ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 60 50 -17% Yes 60 50 -17% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 13 13 0% Yes 13 13 0% Yes Right- facing: East Wall ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes n. artic. length 8 13 63% Yes 12 13 8% Yes lirt- facing: West Wall ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 8 13 63% Yes 12 13 8% Yes S 7K- 9 0 0 0 , • i •-m-m. SITh DATA SUMMARY CHART . .. . _._..,lee po 1176 MIL, . . . .. • • • . .' . (.61V 01 SOLOILL AO . Brim ded start of on 9.1-97 . •• CV 0-010C/01 II 1•••••••••••••••. • .• . .•• . •••.....,."i C....""."... 01 '..."‘....°a• WO."171 flai'Ll0'7C.0.1%(''SILII.001 . .. . . • . El t i FIL al ed constructirm completion: 3-1.98.., - ,..,,..• .; AT LP Of nt oc no,u•c r..-4 vow SW.LL014 0 •. . . .•• •11000.101 1..1 . . . . Existing 7.1311111g,C-2,Local Retail/Commereail ,„, SI 100ANDS.100 I.WIG MCA fo • • • •,, 011.1 00 ALM AI / f 0 Me LAN 4.0-•ArII OLP • i ,MIR Mai OLP ; • " ' • IAA] S HB•574 4"1 753./7' (314-03.1.07.N. Existing 1-11.1).:Medium Density Residential ...,•:•,.....:::',:-.Z." • .f ' r -7,1"c -:AA........-.4-si.. . -t -;-,7",7,7i7TO71.11.1, ----,07'---111.4t.' /4"-----'- -177 l'i - . Sir` i ..,, AA-ii . •• ' - Site Net Acreage: 1.26 A:54,875 S.F. , ._ .. . , .,,,,/ _. ifirritz 46,,,,..-,,,,,.1-1--, , ; .Li \ ;.,.: 1,..T.L. 29.43"..% .-i .-' • , ' . .4 4 Recluired Interior Landscape Area=50%of .... 1:::1 -.•' r• :- k 1%. ) ' '-ti 4 e . : : . I • . -6 'Offe**;/'' ,.......3.. '.•li....,.,. • • • • Intr nor Landscape Area provided=7,100 S.F. CU q) • • • ,. '.''',..2,-...7.-.--• . .•..... ',\•.•••• .......-..• , Percentage of Site coverage:=14.6%• Es::::':::,,c.:: ii,\221-)k.i ..,,, ..( -,6:01 .1r: ::.1,...l. ..,...,,..... . ,... (PHASE D.' "--. i ' • r.,...,k117,0:• •.,wastaot, 14,,..,. Pert entage of Pavement:=36% Qv Citi PROPOSED NF.W. ... t2) . X , ' • ii000 Arel of open space(uncmcumbered)=64,460 S.F. .....„ Cl) • MO,SAD RAO .i. . COMMERCIAL/ . - . % U l'q 04 Percentage of Open Space=85.4% . . RETA IL7.,...'itly'j.."LZ:NG"..,4::.:.64.1.0 464--\-'is.;:e,.:7....• 1 \ ct a.4 ----;".,:.GRO ORG SIR 11..2 Outside Storage:N/A,0% .•F.11..643.0' 0.1.PM so et s ll GEER '''''EP-IA •I. 'i. ...8•14.1 ‘\ ---._.....;,•...V'OD OIST 10 7...* %. Tota•Building Area=11,900 G.S.E. q ) gy.) /- .[A".;,...%-7----N -I '1 °/°°-°-r'“° \ r - ..'.\'• All tc,be Local Retail Use . ....., • - ,o \ - • _,., I. I/ .•'. \ I ' -....4 " • • Total Floor Area=11,900 G.S.F. ,,,,..,,_I ,.., 4._ .;__ ,,i -•-'...,S .... m„,,,x.x.,'..--i.--t.1 Parking spaces required:(1/2004=60 (1..) __ • •H % t FAST 1X/0 . RFSTA WANT t• -1 I • --[W. . •• I . .;: .•Air•COL.L0011 .... ''.L.;1 Parking spaces provided=77 Loading spaces required:=I Loading spaces provided:=1 c;14) lo1/4:::) o.., ....- . . imi ,ThRts 1 i .. ... L00S TVP 1 . .. Nimmber 4[Stories=1(20'.-0") 1,09 lAIADE 0ULS LIP.SIRA1101/ ., , Il. ,•. I 1 PAO 881814(111..••••:COX RAl ,•',.,..., . . _i t•.• 24.1.11 N.vat LAWS ... f''...Ihr'Sr0OLM'O‘NrS7:0, '11...C2"s,"41"' I I 0 T 1. : '• '-i Maximum Height=35*-0" PANINERS.,8100 1.061A Pt 10 RD , wan S..KM an ..:0.10 C-2 LOCAl Al 1•8 CowartiA I.0) SUM 2013.DALLAS_IF.7S271 ,•Ur 0 • . ,,,,, of 7 FIA/LOPLS TVP - , r.trie - .1 V 1 : +v,. • ' .. %2 '44 .• 25AM,..Pl. (II it14,1, .' . .....' St•, .0 . i §I --...'1.'1 ...g, : .:i PROPOSED VARIENCES SUMMARY CIIART q "...I CI) • 1 V,74r1 ,,- i: LI:. : :il 1.Building mthadi line,si North property line.change homier-0' (014?,0 w • i .._1.1;fa.: i'.'','II., to 21T-0-to match setback line at Mate!of develorenceL 12, . ,......_.0.,40 :r . .. ..... 2. Joint Access DAAmexl kw Puking spaces along the Wt.,. .cu. ----••• • c c, 0 Ex •r .r41 or< I 1 air sr.,•t I ar ,i/N.,'1,,,' t, --P..' ... , ... ." •• ozrA -. 7„..,,p11,4..: ,.' i,. ,rte. ,64, ...,., •• ,,,, t . 0 ._.___•,,,„,,,, ,...••,, i -4. .....- ,1, g .....„11..... property line,Fun=amendment to Plot. r1LosH6 ''' .11.0 edt liet...,K.11. 'C'Per .."..x / '• '''' Ve., . TIT/1051 ••••L,0 ,•• t , ' . ' . • 'I : .--- -:--;,.--4 -.. 1 4 I 1 z ‘...1 •,...., 1 ••013•10 Cora 010101 V Pt S00100 ./ ,- ;",:. 1,°, 'r t 1 ROI C 04C171 OW /ONO L.A LOCAL Pt IAA COM/1PC.,' , , . . ....., ....0.- • elOC.SL 01.1.1 11.0 I VI F •sra sane to. i o 0. :,,' _ _ __ ........,...,...... ,,,, „ ... tal 0 I:S .1 'I. :.. 9, .:.::.:.1 ::2•1' . • 111 z 4, r.''t- " ;., ' -- - -4.47,ort.511/ worn.ewe.i Par. .....-• 1.. I JO-le 10IAL SPAM. . i _A'1 `.• • :il el.g --. ., tTF, 4- V4e 6 iA6 PAW10/0„1,r 11. 6 . 4,‘ 'i .. It eAljrEchiFteFcItPs ::',,,,,,,64.% p.44:141.,OCCESS,'•.,i !" ! -1-1.1-1• t!.: :A}ire.dem•.'"' 1,--, 1; , 57 ! Java Hersrid sltesten.ke. ii .. . • All OE 1PEASUREIV,;;'I u LW 0 Ads.Joel Sarin 141111111 5-7. . •• ...A.,,....P.1 omit ctiri ; . ! : ,:!Al 186 POPLI......;.1... 1 g Dan.rens 7.17JI .• I„"..' !.:o"..',..;IV 0/144-Wr. I i .; i VOL 1164 PG WA t• 0.-.16 0 '.•' . 1.0 .00••5•4,0.1 ORLS 110 Telqlvar(111)kU917' .• ! % 13.0....-5/'44.",..,,„,,,,, so 9.4 .' 058.151 .41'. : . .. '.'.'.'.1" rota C-2 LOCAL ACI.couAtaut „02440,4„46.4 .-.-. ----.-.-.-. .--.- .-.---•.-.- . .,,,,,r-•:. Or....- -- - - MENINX : •6"G • Intl.COM 01.1, . ALCAPP IL APP100• 001/litaS AS . . . . . MOW MASI.I ... LLICA.0 I VP ......... ..6 3 i --i I Lill'•RC1‘ ' r.-..,..r., ,3 - _.•• . . - .. i acm . , • ... .6 \\s,...:- -31.C.3-Oa).. ... . ..• .•'. .., LAMP.COLO COI 37.-0.l ---- .. .• !• ! • ... inv:Ay..••_•_- i ........ . . . ..1. •. 70 . SUMMAR IECHARI•11101/ERVARDS. I OWNER:.. . I ro iiiii6aot o ow.ii.iiii trox -- - 1709 SOUTULAICHOARS.LTD. SITE LOCATION MAP • By:&wand Southwest Corp. • ... Www thswwl. i„. th-es i 0‘....... FM HIGHWAY 1709(SOUTHLAKE BLVD.).,16,6)Thm.r.k..1 0..150 14 21 ow...ow. I I NOW. DOI .. • - ...At•AvitAA,At...corn cunt e.turren.ser-er wort s .... "' 0•11.Tear 732.11 .. ' e.......tar ,e,,, , 14 11 Ay oto•P 972.250000S Fax 972.2301950 •' 1 74.. • . • - _....... ._ .... . ,.1.!!.!1 IA 1{17T C.NII I IIIIM Y.,NIS NO 686 o o ...--••••••••••._11,1L•a a.• a -1 P.1 Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 . •• ' ADA1111ARY CHART•IN ARIOR LAPOPECAPA nulara• UV. .V.,,,A , , g, ,4,4 HIRAM 1111 AUDI PRY SUR VI Y,ARS NO 581 tri 9-Z Ilter Olin . • ..,.co w ts.wpsaaws TA 000 b. C 100 P.A00 Tov0 10. 00•ALICAM Ow.. ..A.• a 4 r: 44.• lo , lk, .... APPLICANT:-. I r. Walled. tv, AA.. Dv 1.1 ••••••••• , -- Of r.0%.*PP na•swa• an• gs..--d-o r• ' " le/A ITN soiriiii.xxii OAKS.1.70. 4 i.,1......„, v.,..... tr,nu - --Wv •---- t• Wirt c9f 11.110•Ao trot 10 P0001 POI I a 0.1101101 SI bel4111.41 MOB ._ -. 1..• 0,44 LP• A IT A A - 1 00010 01 I...I Me NV 40111 OM,FAIAP i,IPA.•••••1•••"A.m., 14 Neel INAnd••••••• 1....••• 1„,./11A,as818•1111•11...AM p.., s,tr. Ns , I• /An ••• •.••••••• •Ii.• ,,••••.- .• p p/ A. 16/11•111•11.PRE A a•SO.110 .t.. II: 'MI'- / it/V•11.0 OM.IA troisw.,in./l1.1A ••••••.pap,••••,••• •*,..,...,,,,,,::::Of.,,,....1"d r:4.,1/•••••••• ...,Ail (11 II XA`. 1111W /-210 MINI 11x 11112.1111•30 I I I I • 1 I ___ .p 12,0 -"A",*--•••••••-•.". 1 *IAA,ALL...•p.0.040.0.0..AA 1001.0 0.16•011.0 00...00 A 0 M.An. ..• •••••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••......*•••••Av•P•••A•AV1R•u•1,A.1 .1)..‘,.'11/, ..•,.,I. I pv.• RAP, I%:/•;:41"ra I'.4•17•••••r..•.....*••••• •'"".••• ; TN . FrlYJUN 00 :;10.1.P Tnyt-1.7.2.:1::41 21 rr,icArs.,....."17-____2mit_r.!..J I I v•H wipe)iv ...,1 •,1 11 01 11 K. ary Site Ikvelopmcill Ilan ; ',IAN 01 11 AN. CASE MA:ZA.910.51 • 110 III INC Al /N VUI /695 PG 1.166 018 Prel. . WAIN: 1 to:4r s-LA-I.-11-4---.1-1* : Row in DICAIION trrrilthis'4 a;rraiTO 1 • Amy 14AT •- ,..(lf/IX 0 C•% 110C Al C1:1 1 AIIR CO/AMII nriN .......... tonsil C).Or Ai lif IPA (.....A110. A 101 n____ 11111 4110 411111. • . • iki rlli'i' 0' Q Q Q Q Q - I !1 I 1 I I • i,;i I A- ,_ ;-H__ ( __ 1 Il i f l ; '—i:^. t11[1 N _l ,1 I I I I 1 ••• 1 1 S (ll RIQ WEST ELEVATION ! .,.. ! •-- i t SCALE 1/16•.ISO. 03 SOUTH ELEVATION q k O Q SCALP.:V16 I'-0- A ^`M�VI rt`, O t J O I - N O I Q O Q 111 ! ,'�I��111, -/-- ant.snot.cos _ b \\ ��r1 _ d1111�,�11�1�1�11�I{{XRa ow;.• .s va • Mu sao[.ats. { ®®1.1®1111.®® 11..rev `1 • ,•- ' �::: Car", .%.awn tI �I�I�® �+, 4. 1 I ' r• I �'11'.`''° I O ■ Jf k nc 7i 1 ins o A 1 O 11 11T4•• r..W oe• OW ',woo, M1.0.1 Oche 1 110,10..10.001. far.PILL Y,r1o. i11 1 .J >o-0. Ire. ,000. ».J , rnz ant.11? .....s l..p • re .• I. 1— .arc.xKw• 1� 1 �r EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 6�tT,;:Iw 1... Cr) •....e.e• Iaar.I.,..ri.% " 0/ SCALP' I/16'.I'JY �� SCALE 1/16'.1'0' V v..:..,..1.;- Ie..iM. fe . .1 r% r.. a .lra I{ ? /T, 0100 •C 'C \YZ/ Yes • M6..ua Mr 1 1 11% Ye 1 1 •x r.. Mr.1..p. II r1 •% Ye II 11 .% r.. + .4M.em1, IMAM- 1 1 ! 1 11 ,:�....._ r. �...d a Io anla..e.11.ele.eaw• l o<a`_.rP 0 ,� 11.s+w n...e. w�ri .....1 i .no,s.'.�'%:giii °C.si 'ri:rn i i I Architects R•. Ir• Rr r mrt..[or fM,..N .IIH n b .I 11: V.. 1 1 1 1 _ _.1__-K 51�•uC11w•1R Jar 4Xwk1./Hen,Ir. .nk.nr. 1 1 11% .l • es 1 •% Y. Mw......•. 1 II O. Y. I1 11 .% Y. ; __-,�0' IR—.—'1Y i 1 i y.i' llb Meek.Neal _.n..n.P r0r1 D1.ri 1 1 a,rIgo lot racM I.1.1..w•, w.. wM%- >• i' / f1d..Irr17fUl IVI.rI..eYr veY.Nwk.•.. 1 1 1 1 I rP 75(1I4)I71.IfnJ6Y7 1•Ve.1 1..W DW OW 11=..Ytl nw14• R. RVl 1 1 MIN- n��' I 1 1 _-a SR._ /r 1 r.,:.... fan 17uNu.naf 11...M.y. M 1) -OD Y. M •I .l1% .. 1 M. \I (^� ©t I'--1 a%r vR nmulc. fN..n4.0001 1 1 II% Yn l 1 e1t Y.. -- >I G•C.'IIaN.:.re ©®!L I© ILE11r-� -Al M..w.e1% . II GM Y. II 11 .1t ♦n I 1 E3l;:l i oijEe,pLi I iltyv r.. `nlor rr,vsl ........ i �- I.r:2 o.Y. I r•i snr ., !11_— I Q/\ ; .._Ca111Y A0i1r , - fwdoS,Ps r•I�� _—_-� na °C.nsrtn — — n.� i .__ _.. _.... I i anD1 sae.,c - �--- -- - - r y a, • "" ( �— i —�,ym TH11111ilnn 1 'I sI�11� ' • n r..•ii-..nm•c I .II II 1 �i7E3 1 1- __ -owwlol xaeall.Dlaor ! EIL''� •4%'7 i _ -ro.1�1 E SX.4 rEl rn a Mm t�-1(�'{ i III�IIF __ _ -..--.scar rnc.1.In — i - _ Ir en noa.1 1 .n. r o I_ II IL L u 1L I i ! 1,r.-r' O %ull cot larMrl^aslu 007 I II II l h11-aG. iniTrjw 1 ]f- __1 •1 !i. •r •. 1;'� ,1 k: k ,—_1 ..,— I �t 1 II .s_ I .,..y t { 1 #1.l .- •i . ,C. L _,� 1 �C_ �i:diANliullIIIoiiu I !t ' I i ulii"� P • QI linlargcd lilcvntion I 1 I REC'D J U N 00 is CASE NO:Z1.97-0JG SCAM1N'.1'-0' , Pm*AfwAe /14O I MAY-13-1397 15:575 F t EL:(`G.tTT & TA"1 e t / P.e3/ti? 110 ORDINANCE NO. (D 10 AN ORDINANCE OF I tin, CITY OF SO UTB AKE, TEXAS, ANNEXING THE HEREINAFTER MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED TERRITORY GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS AN AREA COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 480 ACRES ABL'i"ITL"G STATE HIGHWAY 114, KNOWN AS"SOLANA",AND AN AREA CO RISLNG APPROXLMATELY 27 ACRES ABUTTING THAT PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF SOUTHIAKE, TEXAS, AND EXTE'YDLNG I-HE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF SAID CITY SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WI t RUIN SAID CITY LIMITS AND GRATING TO ALL OWNERS OF PROPERLY ALL OF 1 HE RIGHT'S AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS AND BLNDL G SAID OWNERS AND OTHER PERSONS WITHIN THE ANNEXED AREA BY ALL THE ACTS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY; APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN FOR SUCH TERRITORY; PROVIDING A S1EVERABILiI1Y C AUSEE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN l.IY iCr"i Z DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and • WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to annex the hereinafter described territory (the 'Territory"); and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has received a petition signed by all owners of the Territory requesting that the city annex the Territory; and W I3YRFAS, public hearings on the proposed annexation were held before the Southlake City Council on May 26, 1997 and May 27, 1997, not more than forty (40) days nor less than twenty (20) days before the adoption of this ordinance on Srst reading; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings were published in a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Southlake and in the Territory on May 14, 1997, which date is not more than twenty (20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearings: and FA - 1 ' r Y-19--199'7 15:55 =iELC("G.B ET 1 TA't P 8173324741 P.04/8'7 • IIIWHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, has prepared a service plan, setting forth municipal ser/ices and a schedule for extending services to the property herein annexed; and WHEREAS, the ne`..ly annexed Territory lies within the exclusive extraterr torial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Texas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDALNTEA BY 1"HE CITY COCNCTL OF THE CITY OF SOLTH1.AE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Territory generally described as follows: Parcel A - Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107, the C.P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. I to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, 0 Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; and Parcel B - Being a acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County. Texas, the same being Abstract Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, Denton County,Texas; the W.Medlin Survey,Abstract Number 1958,Tarrant County, Texas and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County, Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume: 7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and IIIf:\dles`,slake\ordinance N,annex.002(05.19-97; Page 2 ' hiiY-13-1947 16:56 F I ELD I 1^-C.BAFFET & TP`r1_72 81 1 t c 4?41 P.@5/E7 S Parcel C - Being all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as LBM, and recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; and Parcel D -BELNG a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the CM. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015 and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY, ABS I-RACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described in Exhibit"A" and depicted in Fxhibit "B", be, and the same is hereby, annexed to the City of Southlake, Texas, and the boundary limits of the City of Southlake be, and the same are hereby, extended to include the so described Territory within the City limits, and the same hereafter shall be included within the territorial limits of said City, and the owners and other persons within the Territory thereof hereafter shall • be entitled to all rights and privileges of other citizens of the City and shall be bound by all the acts, ordinances and regulations of said City. SECTION 2. That the approved Service Plan is hereby approved by the city council and adopted, and is attached hereto as Exhibit "C' and is made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 3. The official map and boundaries of the city, heretofore adopted, arc hereby amended so as to include the aforementioned Territory as a part of the City of Southlake, Texas. The city manager is hereby directed and authorized to perform or cause to be performed ail acts necessary to correct the official map of the city to add the Territory hereby annexed as required by law. 40 t,,G1es,,s:sze\orainarcr\30.ncao7.(0'-19-97) Page t Y-19-1997 16:56 F I Q.D I Ki.BARRED' S TAYLCR 8173324741 P.06/e7 0 SECTION 4. The city secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance in the office of the county clerk of Denton and Tarrant Counties, Texas. SECTION S. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed; provided however the passage of this ordinance shall not repeal or effect the validity of Ordinance No. 7 7Co . SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance be found to be *legal, invalid or unconstitutional, or if any portion of said property is incapable of being annexed by the city, for any reason whatsoever, the adjudication shall not affect any other section, sentence, phrase, word, paragraph or provision of this ordinance or the application of any other section, sentence, phrase, word, paragraph, or provision of any other ordinance of the city. The city council declares that it would have adopted the valid portion and applications of this ordinance and would have annexed, and does hereby annex, the valid property without the invalid part, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. The annexation described herein shall be effective immediately upon passage after second reading. ilf:Valcs\slake\ordinance`,anr 007, (05•19.97) Pate 4 . MAY-19-1997 16:56 FI8_DIPG.8ARRET & TAYLCR 8173324741 P.07' 7 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READL'YG ON THIS DAY OF S , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVE]) ON SECOND READL'IG ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: SCITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney • E\Gles\sLskc\ordi.nance\annex. (OS•19.97) Pxge 5 TOTAL P.07 EXHIBIT SLAND DESCRIPTION FOR THE PORTION OF SOLANA FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Being all that property. commonly known as Solana and more particularly described as Parcels "A". "B" and "C" as follows: Parcel "A" Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey. Abstract No. 1107. the U.P. Martin Survey. Abstract 1015. the W. Medlin Survey. Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510. Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283. Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. PARCEL B„ Aficl 23�•a ZI ) leis ‘tw+� ll`� *;s�k' 4-w� uk.+cranca o.�6.4'c.veidtr., #.3 ire-1 4001 i bCL Being alacre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas. the same being Abstract Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry •D Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, enton County, Texas; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 1958, Tarrant County, Texas and the C. M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County, Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080: Volume 7351. Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171; Volume 7940. Page 167, and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod in the southerly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114 (variable width), being the most northerly northwestern corner of said tract of land recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728, said Deed Records, and the northeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to R. Chandler as recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records. Denton County. Texas: THENCE along the southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway 113, the following courses and distances: S 71' 03'21" E. 3458.57 feet for the beginning of a curve to the right: IIIAlong said curve an arc distance of 888.33 feet, through a central angle of 27' 21' 59", having a radius of 1859.86 feet, and a long chord of S 57° 22' 21" E, 879.91 feet; l:`PROroi99990t'OCIvEST2157LEG.DES Page 1 of0 • • S 25° 37' 35" W, 108.86 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Along said non-tangent curve and arc distance of 196.55 feet, through a central angle of 06' 15' 25' , having a radius of 1799.86 feet, and a long chord of S 39° 40' 08" E, 196.46 feet to a concrete Texas Highway Department monument; S 36° 32' 25" E. 215.14 feet; THENCE leaving said right-of-way, West, 2141.45 feet; THENCE S 52° 00' 00" W, 1000.00 feet; THENCE South, 1882.23 feet to the north line of that certain tract of land conveyed to Howard Dudley et ux as recorded in Volume 4888, Page 622, said Deed Records; THENCE N 89° 57' 44" W, 200.93 feet to the northwest corner of said Dudley tract, also being in the south line of said IBM tract as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1765; THENCE N 00° 20' 49" E, 45.01 feet; THENCE N 89° 39' 10" W, along the north line of Roanoke Dove Road (variable width), • 1346.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along the easterly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a variable width right-of-way the following courses and distances: Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 241.85 feet, through a central angle of 89° 45' 10", having a radius of 154.38 feet, and a long chord of N 44° 46' 35" W, 217.86 feet, • N 00° 06' 00" E, 977.90 feet, N 00° 08' 31" W, 394.37 feet, N 00° 10' 13" W, 551.67 feet, N 02° 20' 32" E, 554.17 feet, N 28° 49' 02" E, 164.88 feet, N 23° 30' 55" E, 98.16 feet, N 12° 46' 54" E, 100.00 feet, • N 00° 16' 18" W, 993.50 feet to the southwest corner of the aforementioned R. Chandler tract; I^PROf01999901'OCIEVEST'2157LEG.DES Page 2 of ip gA -7 • • THENCE N 89° 47' 00" E along the southerly line of said R. Chandler tract, 258.02 feet, THENCE N 00° 30' 28" W along the easterly line of said R. Chandler tract, 505.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 232.921 acres of land more or less, save and except approximately 20 acres dedicated to the State of Texas for State Highway No. 114 right- of-way. PARCEL "C" Being, all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 (also known as West T.W. King Road), a variable width roadway, said point also being on the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114, a variable width roadway; Thence along the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114, N 36° 32' 30" W, 587.00 feet; Thence leaving the northeasterly right-of-way of S.H. 114 as follows: N 53° 29' 00" E, 546.74 feet, S 03° 07' 00" W, 344.50 feet to a point in the centerline of County Road 3088, N 89° 28' 00" W, 25.00 feet to the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088, said right- of-way also being the westerly limits of the City of Southlake, Thence along the westerly right-of-way of County Road No. 3088 and the westerly limits of the City of Southlake, S 00° 33' 00" W, 514.80 feet, Thence S 72° 03' 00" W, 47.70 feet to the Point Of Beginning and containing 3.9419 acres, more or less, save and except any right-of-way dedications to the State of Texas for State Highway No. 114. PARCEL "D" BEING a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MAR FIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015, and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: • BEGINNING at the northwest corner of the J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, Tarrant County, Texas, a lit inch iron rod in the northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114 (a 220 foot wide right-of-way); ['PROT01999901'OCIEVEST_'157LEG.DES Page 3 of to .THENCE along the said northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 114 N 36° 32' 00" W, continuing along a projection of said R.O.W. to a point for a corner in the centerline of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road), said point being in the common boundary line between Westlake and Southlake and described in the City of Westlake Ordinance #81; THENCE South with the projected center line of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) (Peytonville Road) to a point for a corner in the southwest R.O.W. line of S.H. 114; THENCE Southeast along the southwest R.O.W. of S.H. 114 a distance of approximately 2,796.55 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the southeast corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M. recorded in V. 7422 P. 2157, DRTCT as described in ordinance #447 city limits of the City of Westlake, said point also being the southeast corner of Lot 1R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388- 214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 88° 29' 50" W along the south line of said I.B.M. tract 907.75 feet to a point for a corner, said corner being the N.E. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M V. 7824 P. 2033 DRTCT; THENCE S 00° 17' 58" W along the east line of said I.B.M. tract a distance of 197.59 feet to an iron pin in its S.E. corner; OTHENCE S 86° 22' 05" W a distance of 518.25 feet to the S.W. corner of said I.B.M. tract; THENCE N 19° 09' 01„ W along the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road a distance of 393.02 feet to an iron pin being the S.W. corner of a tract by deed to I.B.M. V. 7376 P. 1779 DRTCT and being. in the east R.O.W. of Sam School Road (County Road 43088); THENCE S 88° 45' 45" W approximately 51 feet crossing Sam School Road (County Road No. 3088) to a point in the westerly right-of-way of Sam School Road; THENCE S 19° 09' 01" E, approximately 500 feet along the westerly right-of-way of Sam School Road to a galvanized iron pipe by a corner of a fence in the west line of Sam School Road; THENCE in a southeasterly direction crossing County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) to a point for a corner, said point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 and the northwest corner of Lot 6 of the R.P. Estes Subdivision as recorded in Vol. 1957, P. 324, DRTCT; THENCE easterly along, the common south line of Lot 7 and north line of Lot 6 by deed a distance of 1349 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of the T. Mann Survey, said line also being the city limits of the City of Southlake; THENCE in a northerly direction along. the east line of the T. Mann Survey and the west line S of the J. Martin Survey A-1134 to a point for a corner, said point being by deed South 910.51 feet from the northwest corner of the J. Martin Survey and being the southwest corner of the tract of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #319; [:'PROf01999901'OC[EVEST2I57LEG.DES Page 4 of k HENCE N 89° 27' 49" E to a point for a corner in the southwesterly R.O.W. of State Highway 14 THENCE northeasterly at a right angle to S.H. 114 centerline, crossing S.H. 114 to a point for a corner in its northeasterly R.O.W., said point being in the southwest line of a tract of lane annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #126; THENCE northwesterly along the northeasterly R.O.W. of S.H. 114 and said Ordinance #126 tract to the POINT OF BEG[NNI G and containing 27 acres of land, more or less. EXCLI✓SIONS FROM ANNEXATION Save and except those portions of said Parcels "A" and "B" more particularly described as Strips No. 1 and No. 2 as follows: STRIP NO. 1 Being a portion of said Parcel "B" as described above, said portion being a strip of land 50 feet wide, the westerly line of said 50 foot strip described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said tract of land described by deed recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728, said northwest corner also being the southwest corner of the R. handler tract described by deed recorded in Volume 1139, Page 580, Deed Records of Denton county, Texas. Said corner also being in the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road. Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road approximately 1250 feet to a point approximately 50 feet south of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road and the north line of the Scott Bradley Tract as described by deed recorded in Volume 6395, Page 67, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 50 foot strip containing 1.4 acres, more or less. • STRIP NO. 2 Being a portion of Parcels "A" and "B" as described above, also being a strip of land 50 feet wide the southerly line of said strip described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the Alvin F. Olen Jr. tract described by deed as recorded in Volume 4181, Page 644, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said corner also being in the south line of Lot 1, Block 3 of the WestlakeiSouthlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 1466.76 feet to a point in the east line of the Howard Dudley tract described by deed as recorded in Volume 888. Page 622, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; Thence northerly along the east line of said Dudley tract, said line also being the westerly [.'PROD`0(999901',oC1EVEST21 MEG.DES Page 5 of 6 g/q-/D • Oline of said Lot 1, Block 3 approximately 460.91 feet to a point in the northeast corner of said Dudley tract, said corner also being in the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3; Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 1, Block 3, said line also being the north line of said Dudley tract, approximately 1774.98 feet to the southwestern corner of said Lot 1, Block 3, said corner also being in the north line of said Dudley tract; Thence generally westerly along the north line of said Dudley tract, said line also being the south line of Parcel "B" as described above, approximately 100.93 feet; Thence generally northerly leaving the north line of said Dudley tract approximately 95 feet, Thence generally westerly, parallel to the north right-of-way of Dove Road (a variable width roadway), approximately 1396.51 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, Thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 241.85 feet, having a central angle of 89° 45' 10", a radius of 154.38 feet and whose long chord bears N 44 46' 35" W, Thence generally northerly, parallel to the east right-of-way of Precinct Line Road approximately 50 feet, Thence generally westerly approximately 50 feet to a point in the east right-of-way of OP recinct Line Road; THENCE generally northerly approximately 600 feet along the east right-of-way of Precinct Line Road to a point approximately 50 feet north of the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of Precinct Line Road and the northerly line of the Hillwood/1088 tract as described by deed as recorded in Volume 12260, Page 1948, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 50 foot strip containing approximately 7.1 acres, more or less. S I:\PROM 1999901`OC[EVEST2I57LEG.DES Page 6 of 6 'i2-/1 % % 1 .1,., I,1 I li:Ifit:71 1 i ./ (I . ...--- .1. I. i // I SSIVIX Y_-I I iF • , ----\-- . . I . . .... . ,' u .0.i w I tr' \ •• ' - SY)(31'3fK1H1f10S \ _ �1 - Y�4 \i. \,, 1 JJSIHX3 NOLLI/X3NNV VNVIOS :r _ \ t\ • �. I `S•— j\. a'ONdins—\ 1�\1 MOW - I \ I .� 1 ill,''. ..''''‘ \„cc76s„.- -- f), ,\ II ' .-.. \ •, '.d.., ,.,..0,,•' '' 0 ( • 1 ; ' r __ l�J 1 1,4 .l .. !se w.,,, ..'—•�— ell \ •\ \ ''' \\ . .4...• • . , ) :' • • •- •-•... ...7_111k, . \ ' ., ,::,' ' .. ' ii ' . ``� St i .Y.l33YMd uI/ -, :\ \ I 'il (. __ _, ...... )111C ' ----I Ay...l7i, \ i \ "1" 1. '• —I ill 1 . %'' \ '\ \ 1 ' \ . AL 133611M\ f, N. ,.' I k..s...„'".111(,,, ,,,..,,,,,/,..,...,.,,. _,.• , ..._„, , 4' '". I tea- . w � ._ __, .. 1:-.."-_-_%. , .. ... :.',.\ I i..) \' 1 '1- . , -� - J i i i If ,I t•oN eltlls ! ' 2Q0,L ��_,- r • -,O� EXHIBIT tt&u S SERVICE PLAN Municipal services to the following area known as the Solana Project and generally described as: Parcel A - Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey. Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107, the U.P. Martin Survey. Abstract 1015. the W. Medlin Survey. Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Westlake/Southlake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel B - Being a acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 1045. Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, Denton County, Texas; the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract Number 1958,Tarrant County, • Texas and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510, Tarrant County, Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume 7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel C - Being all that certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines, hereinafter referred to as IBM, and recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel D - BEING a tract of land in the T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTIN • SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015 and the W. MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County. Texas. f:\files\slake\annexati\service.001 Page 1 Q�4 -/3 0 shall be furnished after the effective date of annexation by or on behalf of the City of Southlake. Texas, at the following levels and in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of annexation the City of Southlake will provide the following services to the newly annexed area: A. Police Protection The City of Southlake. Texas. and its Police Department will provide police protection to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now being provided to the areas of the City of Southlake. Texas, with similar topography, land use and population within the newly annexed area. B. Fire Protection and Ambulance Service The City of Southlake. Texas, and its Fire Department will provide fire protection and ambulance service to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now being provided to other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas. with similar topography, land use and population within the City. Further, the City of Southlake Fire Department and ambulance service will respond to all dispatched calls and requests for service or assistance 0 within the newly annexed area. C. Solid Waste Collection At the present time the City of Southlake, Texas, is using a designated, specific contractor for collection of solid waste and refuse within the city limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. Such contract for solid waste collection is with Laidlaw. Upon payment of any required deposits and the agreement to pay lawful service fees and charges, solid waste collection will be provided to citizens in the newly annexed area to the extent that the City's contractor has access to the area to be serviced. D. Maintenance of Water and Waste Water Facilities Any and all water or waste facilities owned or maintained by the City of Southlake, Texas, at the time of the annexation shall continue to be maintained by the City of Southlake. Texas. Any and all water or waste water facilities which may be acquired subsequent to the annexation of the proposed area shall be maintained by the City of Southlake, Texas, to the extent of its ownership. It is the intent of the City of Southlake to maintain all water and waste water facilities in the annexed area that are not within the service area with any other water or waste water utility. IIIE. Maintenance of Roads and Streets f:\files\slake\annexati\service.W1 Page 2 09-1V SAny and all roads, streets or alleyways which have been dedicated to the City of Southlake, Texas, or which are owned by the City of Southlake, Texas, shall be maintained to the same degree and extent that other roads, streets, and all alleyways are maintained in areas with similar topography, land use and population density. Any and all lighting of roads, streets and alleyways which may be positioned in a right-of-way, roadway or utility company easement shall be maintained by the applicable utility company servicing the City of Southlake, Texas, pursuant to the rules, regulations and fees of such utility. F. Maintenance of Parks, Playgrounds and Swimming Pools The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, is not aware of the existence of any parks, playgrounds or public swimming pools now located in the area proposed for annexation. In the event any such parks, playgrounds or swimming pools do exist and are public facilities, the City of Southlake, Texas, will maintain such areas to the same extent and degree that it maintains parks, playgrounds and swimming pools and other similar areas of the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas. G. Maintenance of any Publicly Owned Facility, Building or Municipal Service The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, is not aware of the existence of any 0 publicly owned facility, building or other municipal service now located in the area proposed for annexation. In the event any such publicly owned facility, building or municipal service does exist and is a public facility, the City of Southlake, Texas, will maintain such area to the same extent and degree that it maintain publicly owned facilities, buildings or municipal services of the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas. 2. Program for construction or acquisition of any capital improvements necessary for providing municipal services for the area: A. In General 1. The City will initiate the construction or acquisition of any capital improvements required by this service plan within two years after the effective date of the annexation and will substantially complete the work within 4-1/2 years. 2. The City policy for extending water and waste water service is to extend service on an as required basis when development applications or subdivision plats are submitted to the City in accordance with the City's subdivision and development ordinances. 3. Landowners may be required to fund capital improvements necessary to provide service in a manner consistent with Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code. SNothing in this service plan shall be interpreted to require a landowner within the newly annexed area to fund capital improvements necessary to provide municipal services in a f:\files\slake\anne ati\sevice.001 Page 3 c, -5_ Smanner inconsistent with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the landowner. 4. This Service Plan shall have no effect on the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1. B. Police Protection, Fire Protection & Solid Waste Collection The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, finds and determines it to be unnecessary to acquire or construct any capital improvements for the purposes of providing police protection, fire protection or solid waste collection. The City Council finds and determines that it has at the present time adequate facilities to provide the same type, kind and level of protection and service which is presently being administered to other areas already incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas, with the same or similar topography, land use and population density. C. Water and Waste Water Facilities The City of Southlake, Texas, believes that given the current state of development in the area to be annexed, adequate City water mains exist for points of connection for 0 serviceable extensions to provide water service pursuant to the City's standard water extension policies now in existence or as may be amended by the City Council. If further development and construction of subdivisions commence within this property, water mains and waste water facilities of the City will be extended by the property owner or developer in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable policies, ordinances, and regulations. City participation in the costs of these extensions shall be in accordance with applicable City policies, ordinances, and regulations. Such extensions will commence within two years from the effective date of the annexation ordinance, and/or upon development, whichever occurs later. D. Roads and Streets The City of Southlake, Texas, with a cooperative effort of the City's designated utility company, will undertake to provide the same degree of road and street lighting as is provided in areas of similar topography, land use and population density within the present corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. Maintenance of properly dedicated roads and streets will be consistent with the maintenance provided by the City to other roads and streets in areas of similar topography, land use and subdevelopment of the annexed property. Developers will be required pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, to provide internal and peripheral streets and to construct those streets in accordance with the specifications required by the City of Southlake. Texas, for a properly dedicated Sstreet. f:\tiles\slake\annexati\service.W 1 Page 4 'A -/6 SE. Maintenance of Parks, Playgrounds, and Swimming Pools, and the Maintenance of any Other Publicly Owned Facility, Building or Service To the extent that it becomes necessary because of development demands, population growth, and a bona fide need, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, will undertake to provide any such facility which it deems necessary to adequately provide for the health and safety of the citizens of the newly incorporated area based upon the standard considerations of topography, land use and population density. SPECIFIC FINDINGS The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas finds and determines that this proposed Service Plan will not provide any fewer services, and it will not provide a lower level of service in the area proposed to be annexed than were in existence in the proposed area at the time immediately preceding the annexation process. Because of the differing characteristics of topography, land utilization and population density, the service levels which may ultimately be provided in the newly annexed area may differ somewhat from services provided other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas. These differences are specifically dictated because of differing characteristics of the property and • the City of Southlake, Texas, will undertake to perform consistent with this contract so as to provide this newly annexed area with the same type, kind and quality of service presently enjoyed by the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who reside in areas of similar topography. land utilization and population. APPROVED on this the A/ day of Wtit , 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS �scF SOVTy�, ,�-� &%00---'"2_.__. 9' Rick St cey, Mayor • ATTEST: f~ 44 )944444t 11 I . , Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary • f:\tiles\slake\annexati\sewice.001 Page 5 4. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 679, ls` Reading, Street Name Change from South Kimball Ave. to Crooked Lane Blvd. for the portion of South Kimball Ave. from the Intersection of South Kimball Ave. and Crooked Lane Blvd. to East Continental Blvd. and a Street Name Change for East Continental Blvd. to South Kimball Ave. in Heritage Industrial Park BACKGROUND The Thoroughfare Plan adopted by the City Council on March 4, 1997, proposes new construction of S. Kimball Ave. through Green Meadow to S.H. 26. This requires that the current portion of S. Kimball Ave., fronting Greenlee Business Park, be renamed in • anticipation of possible development in Green Meadow and construction of a new section of S. Kimball Ave. A portion of E. Continental has been constructed within Heritage Industrial Park. This section will eventually become part of S. Kimball Ave., according to the Thoroughfare Plan. It is important that this portion be renamed prior to Certificates of Occupancy being issued to property owners. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the portion of S. Kimball Ave. west of Crooked Lane and north of E. Continental Blvd. be renamed to Crooked Lane Blvd. and the portion of E. Continental located in the Heritage Industrial Park be renamed to S. Kimball Ave (Exhibit "A"). Staff also recommends the first reading of the ordinance officially changing these names be placed on the June 17, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council consideration. BW/cre Attachments: Memo from Paul Ward, Chief Building Inspector Ordinance No. 679 Exhibit "A" 8B-1 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM June 2, 1997 TO: Robert Whitehead, Public Works Director FROM: Paul Ward, Chief Building Official SUBJECT: Street Name Change The Thoroughfare Plan adopted March 4, 1997 by The City Council proposes to extend South Kimball Avenue and East Continental as shown on the attached map. A piece of East Continental has been constructed in the Heritage Industrial Park. This needs to be renamed soon because the building is under construction and the Certificate of Occupancy should be issued at a South Kimball address. Also the portion of South Kimball adjacent to Greenlee Business Park and Cambridge Place East needs to be re-named in order to avoid address conflicts. It seems that it is and extension of S Crooked Lane Blvd. And that would be the logical name choice. The known occupied properties affected are: 768 S. Kimball Ave. Pumpco 900 S. Kimball Ave. Texas School of Baseball 1000 S. Kimball Ave. Beech Overhead Door Co. l. \ .\,,` y PW/jb RECEIVED jUN 3 31991 DPI OF PUBUC WORKS 86-2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • ORDINANCE NO. 679 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAMES OF PORTIONS OF STREETS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE" WEST OF CROOKED LANE BLVD. AND NORTH OF EAST CONTINENTAL AVENUE TO "CROOKED LANE BLVD.", FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; AND THE STREET PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "EAST CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD", LOCATED IN THE HERITAGE INDUSTRIAL PARK, TO "SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE", FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City"), presently known as "South Kimball Avenue", located West of Crooked Lane Blvd. and North of E. Continental Blvd., to "Crooked Lane Blvd." has been requested by the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City presently • known as "E. Continental Blvd.", located in the area known as Heritage Industrial Park, to "S. Kimball Ave." has been requested by the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change the name of such streets as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the name of the portion of the street located within the City presently known as "S. Kimball Ave." west of Crooked Lane Blvd. and north of E. Continental Blvd. as described in Exhibit "A", is hereby officially changed to "Crooked Lane Blvd.". Section 3. That the name of the portion of the street located with the City presently known as "E. Continental Blvd." in the Heritage Industrial Park as described in Exhibit "A". is hereby officially changed to "S. Kimball Avenue". • Section 4. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or 8B-3 unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the • validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY S PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY S 8B-4 pro osedStYeet e t $0•0110. , - • . A■■■■1111r•Al 111110-- priterni 01,.. ammo f VA, 41 ,,ION 4111.1Fipie.' " h" lhh6:411t7.1111 iiip ST PKWY EAST ■. .11111 1111 Irk vim`me ,.ttIkl. Fostbg !R�9MBO i p,�ttroay . : ,� et F!Ø T.■Emil,.t A, lilliellIMI mumnimmwaill 4 II ill aggilli 111/*l!9'11Iit& I..�r i ��i�i��/11111• :■■ � r I11 r1r� ■ a ;: A ■- 11 It . IIIII �' rifr,04 • �!'!p ...iii. a 61:11 11 -"--711/4011111111111 -- I I4tII11IiIIN ;g41-44 g ■ mi/ii1 lrigiileriBustEss - , .y■lallial �■ PAS r City of Grapevine e 2 4 f ci. Linn anavo opscp. .......=_I midi no-rwal .&,......5..., ..r.,...1 nun raw,Ireareasin •■:--_; 10" III Pr- lin'—------- _ Scale MB 1":10000• • .R City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM III June 13, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shelli Siemer, Community Services Coordina�t SUBJECT: A Joint Resolution of the City Council and Carroll Independent School District Board of Trustees establishing a joint committee to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness Attached you will find the changes to the Joint Resolution to create a Drug & Alcohol Committee. These changes resulted from the discussion of the Drug & Alcohol Council at the Joint City Council/CISD Board of Trustees meeting on June 10. The changes made to the Joint Resolution are summarized as follows: Changes to Section 1- A. Changed the committee from two to three City Council and School Board members each to allow more input from the City Council and School Board members. B. Removed the Municipal Court Judge as a voting member of the Joint Committee. This will allow the Judge to be a neutral participant in the committee. The role of Municipal Court S Judge may involve implementation and enforcement of some recommendations of this committee. Changes to Section 2- C. Added one staff member from the CISD Superintendent's Office to the staff support section of the resolution. The school district will have representation from both the teaching and administrative staff. D. Added the Municipal Court Administrator to the staff support section of the resolution. Added a new Section as Section 3- E. The School Board and City Council indicated a strong desire to receive representation from various civic groups. Section 3 allows the committee to appoint representatives of various civic groups as ex-officio (non-voting) members. The committee may appoint as many representatives as necessary to obtain additional input from other youth organizations, churches, social services agencies, and other community groups and organizations. These representatives should be non-voting members to maintain a workable size for decision making purposes. More importantly, recommendations from the committee may have budgetary impact. A smaller committee able to consider school and city budget concerns is important to the success of the community effort. ID Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for June 17, 1997 for City Council discussion. \\ \ f ` A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF • THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AND CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES ESTABLISHING A JOINT COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF MEMBERS FROM THE CITY, SCHOOL, PARENTS, STUDENTS AND OTHER CIVIC LEADERS TO DEVELOP INITIATIVES FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL AWARENESS FOR THE COMMUNITY. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the citizens of Southlake are confronted with the societal issue of drug and alcohol abuse among the youth of our community and desire to undertake a mutual effort to address this situation; and WHEREAS, City Council, Carroll ISD Board of Trustees, and the Southlake Youth Action Commission (SYAC) have identified that problems of drug and alcohol abuse exist in Southlake as in other communities, and that there is a need for better and more effective drug and alcohol abuse prevention; and WHEREAS, the best potential for developing new and effective initiatives to combat this growing problem is to partner youth, parents, the schools and city officials, • and other civic leaders working together; and WHEREAS, the entire community of Southlake will benefit from these initiatives; now: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1: A committee shall be formed of members of the City, CISD and the community to recommend initiatives and/or programs to the City of Southlake and the CISD which will serve to reduce drug and alcohol abuse. The committee shall be composed of: (a) Three members of the City Council, appointed by the City Council (b) Three members of the School Board, appointed by the School Board. (c) Two members of the community at large, appointed by the City Council. • (d) Two members of the community at large, appointed by the Carroll ISD Board of Trustees. �1 • (e) Two youth members appointed by the Southlake Youth Action Commission. Section 2: Staff support will be provided by the CISD staff and City staff and should as a minimum consist of: (a) One staff liaison from the City Manager's Office. (b) One staff member from the Southlake Department of Public Safety. (c) One staff liaison from the CISD Superintendent's Office. (d) One staff member or teacher from the CISD. (e) The Municipal Court Administrator. Section 3: Representatives from social services agencies, churches, and other community groups and organizations shall be invited to actively participate in the work of the committee. Such members shall be appointed as ex-officio members. • Section 4: The Committee shall be tasked with recommending to the City Council and CISD Board of Trustees, initiatives, programs, and/ or action plans, which will serve to focus on the goal of reducing drug and alcohol abuse by the youth of Southlake. Section 5: The committee shall serve for the period necessary to develop its recommendations, but not longer than 12 months without further action by the City Council and Carroll ISD Board of Trustees. Section 6: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council and the CISD Board of Trustees. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • • By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary • CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: President, Board of Trustees ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Trustees • • \\A - tA- u W m - , W W W x x � cn m m m m n m N I O m - O o 0 N - Z mc`- m O m W O z m m W - N m m z z z moo -- �� ;; 99- / / / 0 0 0 LL LL W W W LL-m W m m- `S I -- m N - m m I N ___ 0 0 0 o - - X LL J m a -, J J ,J J , U Z Q u mo= =a_ w =amp � H N 2 J - - m J 0 0 - o m -ff� a a J z � - � ;;7o< o m m - s o Im m - i i i LL J O Q1 W m U LL . I I M M " .. LL VJ LI. W W w L LL - m � LL , LL Q R N- m - ' b �- .- m m m m o n m m Q - , - .. .. .. m m O O O „ LL LL' LL ...o �- O N W , m - JC X m W d yx_J-1 z � - O O � Z J J cn a a o; o -1 J n LL Zm - N 6 LL Z N 2 - m z I •• O fJ' - LL om •o- LLm�,�m o No m m N - m - N m In .. m m o i i i z z z z � 0 0 o m m ¢ m ¢ ¢ ��m --a m ��o m m m m 0000. 0000 m 11 II 11 .. W wLL w Z 0 W J J LL LL m O LL r TIMA_ RRQN PROPERTY DESCRIPTION --\��------ - ___�`. \\ GQL F COURSE'`J� 1 i i ' /. �_ �- :;;: -- ) \;.,. \'' �' �f / % BEING A 56.814 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY N 71^28'50' W A DISTANCE OF 21.33 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \ \��/'- �� `� \ ', CAB.`.A, SLIDE('7486 T /k ABSTRACT N0. 1037, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER• �� < \ ` '' TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P. RECORDED IN ' - � \�� ( 1;'` ' I / / :,� VOLUME 12613, PAGE 9813 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N 46^46'10' W, A DISTANCE OF 38.46 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \\ ,{ZONED• R:UD 4$0-0-f0( , 1� 1 •/ ;�t \\ ; �� (D.R.T.C.T.). SAID 56.814 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; LITtJ:.M ©I� y- DENSITY, -RESI . �%1',` ' // \ �\ ,t �; METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: (EXISTING 5U' ROW) EAGLE BEND �, ." / - /' ._ •. \ { �., r ) I , N 57^21'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 20.65 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED iit / �- w �\ �� ) /, 1 / $ 1 I I I I /• ( ` BEGINNING AT A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; \ „__-. ^��1 .,' (•�'=_j`i �, `�~ )� �i� / % �/ ` �, J� �,�, /! $ INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAGLE BEND (50' R.O.W.) AND ^ r` ; �,-� ( ` �� , 4r / ?' THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK I OF THE FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON GOLF N 34 06'44' W, A DISTANCE OF 167.26 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ;' - - \Z / �' COURSE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2985 & 2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; SIS'� -$'VII 6�'' `�. 9�•�x __, - ', COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R r _N`6 �/\ , C \___� - .T.C.T.); / ` ' 1 �,, - <, .:. `-- / ./� 0', �/ i , N 44^45'05' W, A ■ I ;'i-= i ' . \ _ �\� , / DISTANCE OF 237.79 FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED 'I \ _ N. , �, ` I , THENCE N 19^50 28 E, OVER AND ACROSS SAID EAGLE BEND RIGHT-OF-WAY, A 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER• �(,��;, J \� \ �' I , , h ' �'` .y t , ; �a �. DISTANCE OF 71.27 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET IN THE ' J /;' .,- '� J %j % \ ��..T t, � Q. �, / / I SOUTH LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID TIMARRON GOLF COURSE; N 04"14'19' W. A DISTANCE OF 162.86 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED f ,�' �, \ I _�.�, , Q� �. l 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; �� Y. j . f, 4 . THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT I, BLOCK 3 THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN - t\, ,- ( I � j \' . 1 1 �l\ to . �,o OHO �,� I COURSES AND DISTANCES; N 65"34'14' W, A DISTANCE OF 250.71 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED _ ,� �-`\ \.-\ / • ' ,;`�, 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; - �, \_. w w • \ � 1% �� • N 61^57'14' E. A DISTANCE OF 60.28 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED r �^�,\ �_- I`,, �'un , ` \ _ " `% 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 73^42'27' W, A DISTANCE OF 156.09 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED - / 5 LII' TO EXISITiNG � ,_� . .� ` PAV(D PUBLIC ROADWA (/ `�'\, �i I\ `�� '', . I - r _ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; yf , �., I .\ U. 1 '47' E. A DISTANCE OF 99.42 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED �� - S 61 06 i (; [''' r i i w w : 1 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 40^31'17' W. A DISTANCE OF 82.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED �,; '` j' r�Jj��T QI _,�EV�-�y. ,� /w J' 1 _ '- 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; 0 00 200 w � , t -- 1 �_ � , '.` .',,__.= � � -_ S 29"{O'34' E, A DISTANCE OF 104.75 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED / _ �/ w w / , I --�. __ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 49^35'42' W, A DISTANCE OF 210.47 FEET TO A 5/8- IRON ROD CAPPED - - i / j\,� /) J i , � • y y y I; �i \I �' ; - ` ;, i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; - ` / r - / GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I - 2 I ii;;Q ' + `- t 1 S 04"00'07' W, A DISTANCE OF 261.06 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED I : , ^} j ��/ i ) �1 w Ir / Ii' �t 1 ; I - t . 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 06^36'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 266.29 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED r 1'=100, : f i + 1 �/ \ ( f Q � y � I / j ! . 1 ! I j \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; 1 �/ , 0) O. / y t % , 1 '� +� S 29"07'55' E, A DISTANCE OF 315.24 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ! I '' "! l l w , !' ' ; , � , - t, 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 47^2I'S1' E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \ / 1. COMMON GRLN - "` w It 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; w �" - I 1 t 1 /' f, \ / 1 I ! i S 78"22'10' E, A DISTANCE OF 80.12 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 04"09'35' E, A DISTANCE OF 325.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED �' ; I 1; �) J' LOT 52 y w w 1 / I Q , ` 1 \ f 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; I \'� ,' ,�_, �' w 1 k/��, , )\ +; s S 35"04'16' E. A DISTANCE OF 289.18 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 1\ �- / �� / �w y,w w I 10' U,E �� ' ; 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 31^39'05' E, A DISTANCE OF 391.58 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ' ' L��EII I�� v I i V:y �� ' ■ • ii� 0 so �� 1.. III , . •.. P Al{7 =;, v 1 is • v' �� `,J / W _y , '\ (; % - , CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; OUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE -_ - - , _ i ,__ I I ��/ %I ,�,\' •% /` `\11 1 .__ � t , I S 03"19'50' E, A DISTANCE OF 480.45 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED ) / \ (� 1 ( s � \ � ,�, N� \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 19^50'28' E A DISTANCE OF 401.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, �/! `/ /w w y t. \. '', �% � 'DIY, F! ! , AND CONTAINING 56.814 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. t / j` ) 1(-- ' v w w w w f �. , G L1= CO��Rr,.SS S 43^16'34• E, A DISTANCE OF 120.93 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED // ! � /// /�� w V I J �\ 1�-� CAB. SLID yc9$6, I �I 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; >- ��/' / ''/. F / \ \ ' 4 , \ '`� RTCT - i S 76^45'48' E, A DISTANCE OF 529.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; >;� - % ✓ t.' moo\_ \I , I \ cJ L�: MEDIA NStTY E N 89^34'15' E, A DISTANCE OF 977.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED �� / ; (% ) / \ /\I , ` �1 ,, PRODUCT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; �1�0 ! \ i I 1 - �1 10 - E"ti� z ' ) _i\� /' \ Q �t- - L, J = �1 N 55"54'42' E, A DISTANCE OF 22.57 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED �} ' `1 l�l ( l E A 'CARTER & BURGESS'SET FOR THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST '( i , 1 �- i_- � /; / I, ( \ rJ ,f '� r f-t j �`,� - `�/ CORNER OF TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LEGEND J �S6 . ii ��-' ( / 1 ` \ 1`�, , s� �j l 1.�, ��'� _ _ 1 SOUTHLAKE. RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 2625 P.R.T.C.T.; i, LLI a; ' I I 2 /1 ,1, t J ( ! _- I ) `I ,�(/ / j I i / \ , / i ,1 \ \ t }1 ( THENCE S 00^22'19' E, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE, / (�.CL' ~' 1 `__ 4i X I !� -\- i� 1 1: \`', \\�`,`_' \ ' A DISTANCE OF 1034.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BUR T CIRF CAPPED IRON R F GESS' SE OD OUN � % J N;� '"' ` %--- �Q % i \ 1 `, - t - L "I \ �j t \•,. \' - J \ +,. (i FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK IIF SAID TIMARRON GOLF �' Jm;a oQo - I I - 4Y / ,� ��p ._. \ r., COURSE: CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET / \ _., `,' 11 Ir - .�1 „ / G- . p^ r�.�(^'. �, �1. THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY FIVE COURSES ANO STREET CHANGE ' ( 4 �' %8 ■ ! ; DISTANCES; 'I ,1 f i i' / I ))/ I (`�^� / / �' �. 22��0 E : �v� I UE UTILITY EASEMENT ism - \ .. - _ - \ _ 11 ~ , -. N 54^16'41' W, A DISTANCE OF 494.67 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED I ; ` t, /\ / / \ 9_ '_- _ O•l2 DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT / (,_ �� _ I I 1 / / / \ \ 1 l 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; �) 1 \\ f TiMARRON C_- ; - ; / , - � ��%'� -�! / 1 \; \ , I' ' i ' ` N 74^00'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 314.17 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED BL BUILDING LINE /o (� `E) !G'OURS /�; , ' ' /�' 49 i % � \ \ 7 %, \ 1 f % �'' \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; ; --�._ N 46"42'32' W. A DISTANCE OF 67.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED t.., 't a�RTCT / \ � ' ',- - :�' I. / / I � \ 1 �� 1 /� 1 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; / / I + ' ZONED: PUD 480-OIC r Ij/ _ i � \ - v (/ , ( \ ; \! 1 �' t N 66"37'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 142.51 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPE D j 0: MEDIUM. , DENSITY RESIDE ` T��1�� / ' O - \ 1 �9 I t 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; 1 \` 8 ' __-._i,, :, ?? I 48 �' \ . ��i �`� - O S 88"38'35' W, A DISTANCE OF 162.56 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED J' r \ .11 ; f �� /I r -10` L}; l ? l ` \ `� 4 . I \ '. 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; f �/ \\_ � �1 1 �. J,I'I � rl, I N _�_ -` w %/ ; I ! a\ j\ • , �'-, { I\' _ - S 79^40'50' W, A DISTANCE OF 210.81 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \� - if / 1 __�. 1 31 � J \ , % \ , I� \.'`'_- )� , ,i 'CARTER & BURGESS*SET FOR CORNER; r-� __ - _ a' / I m\ _ ( -T- -- ! _ 1 ;s; I -. __ \ o_ 1 :\ _, ,,,:,- r S 84^26'37' W, A DISTANCE OF 120.95 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED a ; U -_ ' 1 , \ \ 9' G 1 1 \\ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; \, J \' 1 ' / ` � I , I O - 1 I / - i _ .- a-, ``'\ / � J I J I I ! / \ \ �• - EXI TiNG 15' y),' J� S 76^15'01' W, A DISTANCE OF 177.13 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED �',,\`, '._`` . �__ NiQ'j m 47 1 / .` I S U E ' ` - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; I I1` ) ,. `` I I ` .� VOL. 11558 PG. 6 7 - _` \ ') �� 1 I J 40 1 -- `i I' • - 1 \� ; S 61^44'08' W A DISTANCE OF 114.59 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ,A /" /s ' O+.n I - , . ` n '` I . '' I \ I ART R & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; I _ I ,/ ii ", �T, ; N I ;rl � REED � i n I / �M N I S 89 '22' W, A DISTANCE OF 32.88 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 1 \ 7, I % I `� VARIABL WIp7H � & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE _.I r I ;; ^•�,T �� ! :�� , i 00' 1 INA , ry j R; O I t , ' 46 �- I 36 1 'D i \ EMEI v 'I I RA G EAS ice;/� I -NI - I` rF '1 \II i _ / I t, \ + 1 -- 41 �! ,/fir 1 . TIMARRON ,/It I / -� 1 . t " (" I , 1, I I � I , \ I ( , -� / STRATHMORE / r ;& I i \) \`i J ( _ \, ,t.�� CAB. A, SLIDE 2395 �' I / r a' 35 I i I 11 �` �- J � I PRTCT fl .I Q s w �= r-- ---�., '. ;;I j � .-� ,r �O � „. ., _ � ,., - LUD: MEDO MDDENSDITYB R 01 DENTIAL \ / �% ' i - \ -_ \' � I � J. 1/} \� j i ��- *VILLAGE '1' INCLUDES BYRON NELSON PARKWAY 1! , i / 1( \f \ / / Y 1 r ,. , , \ 12 r r-�. I . r -;. -_ 4 I '. v 3 v 1 rr r I I i� _ Z �I I p N0 ES. I I �� i T . , / ; O fi 44 \ �� , `I °�W - \ \ ; I \ k �, J - I. ES DENTIA P I - , o, XI TIN \ 1I -y_ �,_ 1�, -- -_ -- _ : - - -- - -- - - _ - - __ EXISTING LAND DESIGNATION: MED UM DENSIOTIY RESID NTIA , w1 ___ -- , - - -- - - �-- L/,/ - '` - w\5 O i , � -\ - r -ri` I _ 2. ALL BUI IN T ■ 4 , 43 -- - - - 29 \ P� O ` y-' � t-- - - f' - _ 1 _ ,, / �, , : THE DEVELOPMENT _ ---,� ( LD G SE BACK LINES SHALL BE PER - ------ , f - - R E G U L A T I A _ ' _ _ _-- "_ _ / ONS TTACHED TO TH \ 11 ) - . - - __ SUBMITTAL. \ ; _ 1 { �.J - , _ .. J - - S - - 1 s I + 1. , -- \ 9 9 �� --- - '�- r - a 3. VILLAGE J INCLUDES A R • _ _ _ x _ i1 LL ES DENTIAL LOTS COMMO m _ \ \ N GREENS _ - \ \ ; ' , \ - �. _ . \ -- - - 'r- \ I, i/ AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS. f. \ - _ _ /i r 1 t / x\\ 4' TIMARRON ( 1 1 - - c� 6- , -- -- / / / \ , \ r - 1, � \ OLF R ; , : - G COU SE � f�''- / 28 . 9 ;� - -- \ - D m ) % 4• SCREENING FENCES AN WA \ 1 / \ .-- \: ♦ �� J'- S'' �` _ CAB A SLIDE 298 - 1 I D LLS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN t I J .I r i 1. �' . - s ; _.__ r 6 c);o r ,\ ; ��' SIGHT TRIANGLES R 1 / \ ; ; �. - , PRTCT -(.� i �.._._� 0 V SIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC �_ : /% 1 _ 1 `� ; f1 ..- \ 9 _ ___ � ' + t � I fi o. - - ` ,z: N ERSECTIONS. 1 -'s, - - ZONED. PUD 48 01 - \ I,... _ 1 �__z 1;' i i' $? ( ! lUD:.MEDIU D NSITY RE I NTI - �,v� �� \ 1 i \ �-•--- / x I _ i I 1 c/ 1 _ 4 t\ J i :' S 1 ,, 9 - - - , / , ... © 1 TH MAXIM � ._ _ --- _� ,, ,/ , 1 .--,- . •�, ,,, _ , - E UM GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIA �•.: 7 - - - _ L USES WITHIN \ \ %c� / J J , _ - 1 B - �. ! - - • E VILLAGE INCLUDING COMM N R \ t , - /I' \ ( ; 1 L , ( , / N55 54 42 -.Irk 0 G EENS IS 1.48 DU/AC. , , ' _ -- \ \ ! -- h.. J - / _ ;�, 9 34 15 E '\ _22.57' \ t / I ; , \ - \ _ 1 - _ - - % ; ti ,. __ - L.U.D. - LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM CITY MA T P 0 1t � , ; I � . - _ I \ , --- _ , -. - - S ER LAN - \\ ti \ . -- - �� l R _ - , /�. - 6 _ -_ \ _ LO K I y - I / ,-- v I \ t _ I J 1� \ /y t w w _ / .� 11 i \ \ , 1+ , _� , �. -- ! (/ . , l __. - (' 1 �• , - ;.. , / sue. ., ': _ram" `... w w ; w \ \ 20 B.L.; \ w __� 3Q1 32: 35 36 .J 1 , 6 \ _ w _ _ ,, _ , �.. a _ ., yaw _ i 38 i „ 1 _ r,:' z LDULE 0 DEVELOPMENT - J 1 w w lr / I 15 L. �1 J - _ -I { _ o t , - ,,.� r _ .. - _, ',. \,r -- ,-- ,i, , � . � __. r \_ ._ _ �J- w y y /Jr r- - � BEGIN CONSTRUCTION , f /� - � 1 NNNNNNNNNt7 i O + _ b' U,r ;'`� / J w wow FAL 1997 ! \ � a % Qr Ci % _ L ',. -'', I L , ! , , ./ / �:, _ / I,/ i I1.I w y I ` _-_- _ �^ - .b ,v I �. w -. j1// '' �f .. 'j , UCy I I ,. ` ( - -- - - - - -''` \ � \ V W' A. E WIDTH ,. / • / -- - w w w k w \ -- 1 • I w ;1 j Y�_ \, - \.E<. T Jf\ w _ --�. ) w B + A C SStNG i I I R ` _- �- \\ 1 -,\ +, \- -- - ,/ '\ V • � / j'I\ y �. w `"'x y - --_�_\ .�:..,.. w w w , �' W y y w 5O' ---- \ \\\ \ \ Li --�\\\ �� 1 I J I,'jJ� ( i s i / \ \ •� \`` . �.• .`_ -_- - - w , w w w I I w w 6 5 4 y .� �. w .� I; 'I \._\ l� (\\ I \\ I •�y� /�� I :,`, . W 1 , :,! 1),' _ y �, ' '. 135� 8 -f- - _�- ---"_�� i-- _-- .r- w w I t.. �` w w 3 .r, w w t . �, w /� �- `- ` \�`Jl l� ,.. W ii 1 1 r ;/ , r i s 1 .-' / w w 1 / / ,, \ _ _ ` -. _ - mot- . w Jr 2 ' � � J. w w w J. u l •L I V' U1 \\\ / L_ 1 2 \ ti -.�-� -� yy y .L w... y 4 t:� LOCATION MAP N.T.S. r f s' / f.', r \ f /,' ) / PARCEL ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE ZONING LAND USE NO. OF LOTS ACREAGE DU/AC COMMON GREENS COMMON GREEN ACREAGE % OF OPEN SPACE PHASE I. SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 66 32.81 2.01 2 2.78 8.5 PHASE I. SECTION 2 N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 95 69.67 1.36 4 13.35 19.2 PHASE 2. SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 32 16.81 1.90 1 0.78 4.6 PHASE 2. SECTION 2 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 55 41.85 1.31 3 7.18 17.2 BRENWYCK N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 56 27.63 2.03 2 5.24 19.0 WYNDSOR CREEK I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 40.74 2.06 3 5.02 12.3 GLENDOVER N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 53 38.86 1.36 3 7.23 18.6 ESTATES N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 30 22.78 1.32 3 4.72 20.7 VILLAGE A. PHASE 3 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 5 5.7 0.88 0 0 0 CRESCENT ROYALE N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 155 48.21 3.22 13 7.15 14.8 STRATHMORE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 109 61.50 1.77 3 2.53 4.1 WYNDSOR GROVE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL III 51.86 2.14 4 6.71 12.9 BRENWYCK II N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 112 44.78 2.50 6 1.33 3.0 VILLAGE 'H' SUMMER 1999 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 225 91.17 2.47 5 3.99 4.4 VILLAGE '1' * SUMMER 1997 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 145 61.01 2.37 5 5.09 0.8 VILLAGE 'X SPRING 1998 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 56.81 1.48 7 5.4 10.0 WYNDSOR CREEK II SPRING 1998 PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 26 15.93 1.63 4 2.9 18.0 SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1443 728.12 1.98 68 81.41 11.2 GOLF COURSE --- 148.73 --- --- 148.78 --- CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USE) --- 12.61 --- __- -__ --_ SUBTOTAL GOLF COURSE --- 161.34 --- --- 148.73 --- PHASE 5 C-2 USES PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 10.69 --- --- --- --- PHASE I C-2 USE PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 6.04 --- --- --- ___ SCHOOL SITE PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL I 17.42 --- --_ _-_ __- GRAND TOTAL 1448 923.61 1.56 68 230.14 24.9 j 1 - - / y w w ■ Y `\ / I '`.` 4 , \ I : ,/ + , 1� y , / 1 -- - /. � _ --__- - _ I - - - .._ _ ,t- .✓ w w J, w. .L .L J, w ,,,, \ 9 �5m'� ---:I / ^ >.;. 30 COMMON - --- w y w ['� .:.::.�. ,.�. ..�. ,�: ,I, w w y y y .� w w w w i i y w' \ -��, \ . , w�l h $ :EASEMENT I y_ .= # k b �.\ �. - :`:- ._ .. L. ._._ - . -. ._ . -.... _. -- y y. y � w w :I, .I, w w W w `.w .1: ,I: ,r,. y _____ ....-. -. 0 \ \ _ . w J. - r. .m-.:.: �. ,.' w w w w Qy w �•+' W. �L w y V 1 + - _- - w w w \. -i w -w w w . ` \ \ ^�/1f\ ma y: - -� '... -. .. . - _ _._ . �.. J _ y -`.. .1: - w w w w :e-" -'y w w ._'.y w .v I I I �. w ' "k /. 1 - +N vw - _'---' ,\ \ l \ 1 - w w ' w w .f. w w N,-. �J: I y,yy'tiI J -.� ..` �� ♦, �.� w w - i / w w w w .L . w1 w w w W, y ��i .... _- __----" \': \ ,\ �\ l �/ I w .�-. " w w w w .I. / _ _. --_- - - < �. 4 /N S - w - ,i,� '\ w w w y .1- W .I, y .I. y w - _ _.. ` '� \ - - - _ ___ f \ ,� CK 62 � � ,.. - \. I, `\ \ \, � \ • I, O ' w .I- / 1u. I., 1 \ w �''. � w - III {'�Yp 9 - _ T \� , - :', \.r C� w EXIST • l5-ti:E--�-'_- \� w ~ - - y w w w w { ,� .. � -' -- 1 \w w w - w w O IMARRON ADDITION \ \ r` w w - - -- VOL.11558 PG. -7 . � `Z-. w w f \ � �'� w 25,B.�. ; 1 r r __._ ---------------- �\ �' �_-w_ w - 10 .Il w CRE NT ROYAL \ - R �, (/ _, '� w / _ - - _ w ,w w ! _ y A' CAB AE SLiOE 2626 J \ t �`°-.. `\ \ . - 1 /jI t w o - r - r J _ - - _ _ -\ - `.. -.-.:� .- +k•-�--�1--..w ,, .., -vim. W \...... / ,�, ,\ J/:"'''\.� (''� -__- J . y , -�, y,, 7 • `, PR T .. \�\d \ \ 1 f /-� / J , _ i/ w nn ` _ . . _ . , r _ _.-- \ - �L' : 1A..�Jc. _�� ,l, �. w w \ J C -J A....__�_^ r - END CONSTRUCTION SUMMER 1998 , DATE REVISION MADE CKD. APPD. &1- .. .. \. 1 .:..\ f / �i \ VV IU \ w w - y w.__.I. Z+�. �.♦ .� w \ - _ -"' N... •,1 - ��/ 1 t / \ I l Fl.- J ^ d �I ,j LU LU. UU 4� U1C �••� 19 1 r \ / C / r r- r It / - _ W 6 .� , ..,.w LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIA � e� A 5 I L:s ;• i .. _ i w .� TIMARR `� �,\ . � _ ^ W 5 A1 9 3 w. � � w w - i � ON ADDITION /� j% ' j/j�/1 I .:. , , \\ r y ...- G A •"1 � 6 S s w ' _. w :,, � .i- .I. w w �. w • - _ _ ` ; : \J /, .. i r , a i Jam+ I - --' w ,6�.,1. I w i/ a „ _ .v- - I.,", \ ` / \\\ TIM N A ITI - f." \ .. 01 10.95 w w • w -. � / w 1 ; \ s L y y w y w _ y; VILLAGE J , 9 cc �/ G PHASEy ,'`SE ION 2Q �- <' ..� - :: S ^ w Q w - :. . , r :' r .-- -:. , L , ! t ��_ I \ •,, � / *� � ,13 4 2 3 2 W `� �: f /, \ � y y \_1� 1 r , I v:::,'^. '\ \ jJ -j , ,; 1i MON -v�� E'STAfi , fi B T CREEK r / ._ i 1 _ ,'\ I �: ,\\ \ ,. f � -,,� �, � �. � � �. � �. w Ew ,.;-'� __ _ r' 'I __ OUT OF THE /� \\ 6 7 /� 1 ;; . j i .may. ,, Q \� �`._ I\ _ A i _ V 1. 0 5 T� 1 "W w w w w \�.-.,) r, r (- w , CQ SLl E 1711 } / / r D► / / ;' \_ .. (/ / %; E I TC _�,.'' ! y":� 6� A� = I ; Nfq., x ,F: sots y w.,.w-,w \ �r =-jam _ 4k, I ., HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1037 \ -�S.- N572159, S �� \ 0� ��wwww \ /,r/�l!I ZONED: PUD 4 O-QIC /- °; ;, :',1': ,-- RON I I 3/ \� ; w w w z / J _ l HOB ORTH '�• , ! t &T 20.65 TIMAR 4, �w w w w r. 1 rka S 1 V! y rABSTRACT IN THE LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL "'I �, yy � PRODUCT GO F R 1'�I .4 w w w � ��- /J//, I, 1� ----�---- - ----------I�lk7. �97 ♦�� S89 03 22 L COU SE \ \w w w - lr. W� r - - "` - I I y y �, cnr, [ / OR, SUR Y� ' C OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY TEXA Ij \ 32.88 CAB. A SLIDE 2986 A _ 4�:, _: >. j(/ y S PEA _,r i' B'ST�;�_CT ,N ;4, _\ f ' ,-'� - PRT T \w �, t r .� . . } JI 4 t N71 28 50 W _ = J _ .._ / m;_ \� - - \ , 6 6 0 , ZONED• PUD 4 OIC- - , - / � - 56.814 ACRES/ 84 LOTS \ �\� f ; ' t ' , � rio,1 , , . 38.46 21.33 �.J I _�\, - - \°., •_ \.\ i : LUD: MEDIUM DENSiT r RESIDENTIA \ - - �"LL -i r' - _ - -- - - - L \\' t A _ COMMON \ G �� \\ .1 �� •. �f" oN; I' `'`�\� 7 REENS ;\ 7L ^ /` ;` \\:.-*, ,- �� ` \ / _ •8 \ CAI \ _. \ \ T ,'\1141, : � r - __ _ \ \ OWNER/ V P - `�'� / _ \ = n,: DE ELO ER• WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P• / 1 \\ \` \ .,_u4 A P P -: 05 V RGINIA ARKWAY /r= -�, � �y \ �``1\ \� � I ' v" ' McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 i /- \ - - - ' `.. _ ♦ ,I p�, - 7 = ---- `\ \�. (9 2) - 988 FAX (972) -5540 sue_. ll 5 9 \<\ F \ \.\ - - , „ y \ N I N • . , __� ` �� //`-' _ , E G EER. CARTER & BURGES INC. \ �'/ ..�� -\..r = -\-z� .6-r- -_-- ._ ` :=_ = ,`cam. f . \ _ -. - . 9 r ,, E ,: � _, _ j �`� �`� , \___!,� .,. r \ /\ _ 7950 ELMBR00K DRIVE, SUITE 250 -�� 4 / {\, �- -./,r \\ �� \`\�\`I\�� - _.. �� )!� - - -' ; -. DALLAS, TEXAS 75247 --\ o\\\ ;;- -' - , \\ \ (214) 638-0145 FAX (I - -- - -- \C� 1 2 4) 638 0447 1 APRIL, 1997 CASE NO. W� C&B JOB# 952236010 DDA�CDTV nCCrOIDTIAM N m to m I 1 N N N N 0 N m m m 1 m .. m - In - v N 11 11 11 -Z= 0 o m w m L, - c co s X X U X X - ZE� - m w • I Z J 4 O J m a i m m m z w m o - a m o m m m U m m m N - J N v - in H m m - / / / Zzz o-o m-, --, ¢ 4 m`2� H H N H / / / m m m 000 ��. LLL 11 11 11 LL LL LL wwul -mm m - , [n m - m Nm v 1? N 1 o m N - 11 1, 1, zz= 000 m O J - N w m m ¢ X m w - 9 m N Z z a J J a N w - m c� - m 9 m / / w - o H m 0 N J m m w - - w m m d- N m•-m / / zz� 000 ¢ m ¢ 2 ¢ c6 4 1-I - H / / i m m m O m O .1 n LLLL LL W w m ��T m m m m mN zzz 0-0 m X J ¢ X LL J 4 J Z - H J J J Z O , U) .. Zo- o • m , Z ¢ m - W N-- �- � I�-1 N O if J m � m / - J Z Z Z LL m moo; =�. K 4 J Z < < > O � mM - ¢ / , ro - mm In �,y oomm�- o m o m 1, (z i1 w J -m m -W LL , W W t. ,� LL �ww- N - e 11 N • VJ m - b 1l) 0 -- o m o m m --1 I m m 11 11 . 'O O -¢ Z Z Z W m o - „ ¢ ...m 0 o m - d N J O N u, LL m - > a x x m w x J : - a 0 Z J - 6 L � Z , C _1 J J a c a m N 6 Z N , I z I •• /u m - 0m am�m,. O N O m •, N m N ,J Hm H N c m - ., ;�1--, ,. Z Z Z Z ----Q = I = m �-��- ti I - m m m m 0000, , L L L 0 , 11 11 11 „ u L LL LL Z C w w w c ¢ s ¢ o a TIMARRON ..•_. _.... ____....._.. GOLF GO.URSE BEING A 56.814 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, N 71^28'50' W, A DISTANCE OF 21.33 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED -._�-?;, - � ,' "r/ 1 / • % ABSTRACT NO. 1037, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; �\ �`�`�� Ck�t�G'\1-ID 298, �� -- �`�/ y TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P• RECORDED IN ��`��-��,\�� \ `\ / , VOLUME 12613, PAGE 9813 OF THE GEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N 46^46'10' W, A DISTANCE OF 38.46 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \- �� //�-- �=-�� 1 ��, rr1,,\�,,� ) r \ ( j / / (D.R.T.C.T.). SAID 56.814 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; ' -- = 1. I / � {'.'� °I �. : Z��'N�,p• Pub-__Q.!•t, METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS. T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED ' �/ /� �,' ' \ \\ \1\ i / N 57^21'59' W, A DISTANCE OF 20.65 FEE LUD: DIUM,, D€NSI, ' , SIDENTIAL BEGINNING AT A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; L (EXISTING 50' ROW) EAGLE , \ \ , \ _• - " ( �'� ,' ./, r) I ; ,,t BEND , ♦ / / l �• INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAGLE BEND (50' R.O.W.) AND �., ,. `� �� f /�i/% // ri /�%;l 1; 1 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK I OF THE FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON GOLF N 34^06'44' W, A DISTANCE OF 167.26 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED ' �_�,./� ��'� \�\, ; 0,.` f �\ \ �^ (" - ,/� ,�•';,' ; ! /" COURSE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2985 & 2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; _. f Y` \ \� --�- - / l ♦ COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R.T.C.T.); 2� q j �`•. . ,' � N 44^45'05' W, A DISTANCE OF 237.79 FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED �4 \ . �l .-,::,. ` -' ��.' ; i � i THENCE N 19^50'28' E, OVER AND ACROSS SAID EAGLE BEND RIGHT-OF-WAY, A 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; ' / \3I "� `' h V .' DISTANCE OF 7i.27 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET IN THE J�(' • -') � q, ; ``` �j� \ \ iy � / �� ' SOUTH LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID TIMARRON GOLF COURSE; N 04^14'19' W, A DISTANCE OF 162.86 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED �J1, = } \ ( Q 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; 1/ �% t, ( ��\`�� \ �' y'• I \' �1 _,- Q� .` THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT I, BLOCK 3 THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN N 65^34'14' W A DISTANCE OF 250.71FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \J -) r, f A ) I 0\ %% / r ��/ \ • •• . COURSES AND DISTANCES; {�_� / ♦ `` ` �' `, �. ' �O ,' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; Q -- N 61^57'14' E, A DISTANCE OF 60.28 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED , < �V ` -- ' �+ �� ' 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 73^42'27' W, A DISTANCE OF 156.09 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED D w t"-_� / ' y, �� \ `+ \ ` +� 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; l� ' '/ �^ ;mil �;� t ,�,- + �- - .= S 61^06'47- E, A DISTANCE OF 99.42 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED : /�\�( j \\�i r J} ,!" /mil U. i� �v - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 40^31'1T W, A DISTANCE OF 82.55NFEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 0 100 200 - 1 '. ;' r - \ CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR COR ER; i i !1'\ /,I \� '+'.�' ^( + r } 145' 1 Iui -__ __ S 29^10'34- E, A DISTANCE OF 104.75 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED i'P01 yT ��t �EG,I Ill G, I -' �'' / --- � "*' CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE , CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE � ET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED RAPHI SCA IN F T 4 2' W ) \�_ _ 1 /iJ 1 I } -0 I I ; I -'-* r - ;' S 04^00'07' W, A DISTANCE OF 261.06RFEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED G C LE EE N 49^35 . A DISTANCE OF 210.47 FE �/ R• I ^ % ' 1 / ow -- " 1 j ', ' ` �� C N 06^36'33' W. A DISTANCE OF 266.29 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED I'-100 : , `i\_ / i ' (p - / i , h,;� \,. . 1 �� ! _ ARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; _ / / ( 2 , I t : + } \\ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; ,-7 / ) ' 4 `�`I I "I ET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED ' \ / J •i ' 1 ! ' L� . \ S 29^07'55' E, A DISTANCE OF 315.24 FE t f � / t� �t t !; , l / ;I �\ TO A 5/8 IRON ROd CAP ED I I / I * ' _ __. ) , , I , -.� \,'\ .t , `� \ i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; T R RDI SS SET FOR CORNE : �// / , i i -' '' �` / a► ( / 179'/ i , I • • \ CARE & BU N 47^21'51 E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET P t , ,- y 1 J ///I/ i �i ': f � ; ` - / rn - ^' COMMON t;R�.EN-. J' t` � I , :I , ;tt `1 J, ' \ t 1 \_) \ \ `- " i , ,, - __ '\. '. S 78^22'10' E, A DISTANCE 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET OF 80.12 FEET TO A 5/S IRON ROD CAPPED FOR CORNER; N 04^09'35' E, A DISTANCE OF 'CARTER 325.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED LOCATION MAP /', i \.^ ,..- : / , , O \ \ 4' & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; _ , i / i'" I ,! --- -' " I ; cJ , 1 ( LOT 52 - r ,_ r,\,` I - f" , N I a I;' + I N , _ a + -`) 1, (� ," i -- i 1 t \,. '� , i �+ S 35^04'16' E, A DISTANCE CARTER & BURGESS SE T OF 289.18 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED FOR CORNE R; N 31^39'00. E, A DISTANCE OF RTER & BURGESS' SET FOR N.T.S. T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED 391,58 FEE OUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE CORNER• 1 `, / ' �^ ( �/: i r / ' ` `n 10, U•E' X ,, , • �, CA I i / t\ \;, 1 r ,r / I 1 � I - ,`�'' I S 03"19'50' E, A DISTANCE OF 480.45 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED \ �� /' ) ) f , ( y,,, �, ,- ( 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; N 19^50'28' E, A DISTANCE OF 401.96 FEET TO THE POINT` OF BEGINNING, ( \-� J ( .F.-16.306 I -/._ ' ', ( i AND CONTAINING 56.814 ACRES OF LAND. MORE OR LESS. „' I } ) ! \ , / \ \ . \;\ , 1 °! S 43^I6'34' E. A DISTANCE OF 120.93 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED i 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; '� \• ( f : / \ i \ - . \ S 76^45'48' E. A DISTANCE OF 529.05 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON R00 CAPPED f / \ 11 i \ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; \\ __ • . : � I I , I ` ! / /; �(,: / - ` �6' i '. f �0 '-%% LOT �� BLOC 3 1 ,` w N 89^34'15' E, A DISTANCE OF 977.55 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED +� <; - - f -!/�\�y I , oo,\ / \ ; I I It �3 O - 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; /'�� i _ "�: ram_-_. _'_� t- ` / ♦ , O ` ) r V N 55^54'42- E A DISTANCE OF 22.57 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED / , LU � - \ 1_`'�' y \� \' s O � �%+ ^ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST LEGEND - ' S �+ TIMARRON CORNER OF TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF / . � SOUTHLAKE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2625 P.R.T.C.T.; p o , N o , ' it I / \ �� GOLF COURSE \, J ,V; THENCE S 00^22'19' E, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TIMARRON CRESCENT ROYALE, CIRF CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND J ; ; `-�', _ ,, o : \. � h F , AB. A, SLIDE 2986 Z_ ♦�C! 6- {o A DISTANCE OF 1034.89 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET �.' l FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT I, BLOCK IIF SAID TIMARRON GOLF /' ;`'� _ - I j h i fX \ G PRTCT couRSE: CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET \ _ 1 \ , , o ; Qc�-- ,.� I :t ,�� ` i / �° I . , ` 'r + \ Oh}Ep: PUD 480-01C STREET CHANGE m Iz I I �� I 6 v� `,� L IUM •DE�.Y RESIDENTIAL DISTANCES �NG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY FIVE COURSES AND ICE UTILITY EASEMENT C \ \ �. r , : .. /I � , 1 'I : J V) f /S , i I a 6 N 54^16'41- W A DISTANCE OF 494.67 FEET TO A 5/8' IRO^! ROD CAPPED NT / i_jm, r i. 'tip / 9- \ o \ - - EME ( J CO / �Q J,` i / \ 9 ,1I Q Q Q Q C)•12 CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE , r / �� ++ R• DE DRAINAGE EAS -r; ,: l " ;" _ ,. / �a . - BL BUILDING LINE �; , : = T TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED I i 0• ', CARTEOR &•BURGESSTSETEFOR CORNER; 1 ` i 1 I I: - I, ✓ 7 �, 1 I ) / 1� � �: / 38 y �, ( It - ,� N 46^42'32- W, A DISTANCE OF 67.05 FEET TO A 5/S' IRON ROD CAPPED / t L/ i );' , -� �.-- , /- / / / • \ 1 I 22 . J1 i \ 13 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; __/ / g,! 'L �.. _. - N 66^37'33' W, A DISTANCE OF 142.51FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED i \ fiIMA IRON \ / \p _ - \ ' O I _ 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; / - \ �� 9 /11 I I, _,I `,, R CAPPED - .) I �i�Lr COURSE ; / / �y ET TO A 5/8 IRON OD l - / / --- - --, \ 8 I •/ I �� ` \ % ! O S 88^38'35- W, A DISTANCE OF 162.56 FE I \ I/ (`_' : ,CAB. A, SLIDE . 29�6 \:r1' I / `, _. \ \ , CARTER & BURGESS SET FOR CORNE , 48 / _ 1 \ ZAo i L� ' F 1 � ,i \ n R. j ; , I_TC ;- 41 / 1 h� \�� `9,D \`� • Qp� `, S 79^40'50- W, A DISTANCE OF 2I0.81 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED �. (( \ )f �` /, i r, ` ' .IC ( N , \ \ It , (1 ` \ 0 •CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; (( { I zoN�b■'Fug, q8o-p I �/ / t / ! 39 ! 37 �� 1 ( \ �o I/ . I I m\ � I ,i \ ' ' I I \ ram` - S 84^26'37- W A DISTANCE OF 120.95 FEET TO A 5/8- IRON ROD CAPPED LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 16z., / / P i--� - ,:1 { - Y - - - 1$8 +n �n ! ' `\ \ i ` /�� \ I I I 'CARTER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; ,,�"'�-�) v, I i� 1 ' 1 �� \ + •F ' S76^I5'01' W, A DISTANCE OF 177.13 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED _. + �,' EXIST (\ .� : , i a. ,' I J 1� i 3 - /.- 109 'I _ ,,_ ' -.,,., 2$ `S'<- ►NG '15' U.E 'CART,ER & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; j �`,\.� /J i 1. l,+ t' ,,/�/+1� ,•,O� 47 I I .Y T ` I �+ VOL. 11558 PG. 677 \ & BURGESS SET FOR CORN EE TO A 5/8 IRON ROD CAPPED 1 -' I f \. �� i' • I o N I. ��- - � i `� .� S 61"?�4'08' DISTANCE OF 114.59 F T ' - I I I 4 0 _ ti , (c R ER, %'- I Din 163' m - -- n yt I a+ v % � S 89" '22' W, A DISTANCE OF 32.88 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD CAPPED 1 11 . iV I N I `� �� h, �� VARIABLE WIDTH �3 I ! Q'� ,, \ S, Lo I RJE'R & BURGESS' SET FOR CORNER; j I � i�� 'V�� f I m1 I 147 \ ` 1 +DRAINAGE EASEMENT l �i ,tI /_ �,�I+_ . I o 36 oA' I. I • (/ ',',\�;: \�/� Z 4f- - i - \ 1 �' �. ` TIMARRON \.-'/ l\/,' - NI I -- I � i STRATHMORE 1 1\\, ., 1 "\ / . ;' ,, _ 165' 41 `°P w� ; C 9 5 I I ~ I .I 'I 1 AB A, SLIDE 23 / ,//, ;J \ \ I PRTCT II , ) 9. cn f ZONED: PUD 480 OIC \1' �. ,: _ +h, i m ,� \ t48' .9- 35 ' I 'r O t t • M DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL y ` A ♦ o _ w 1 n LUD. E J I r V an; �r , apW . \ J _ t ) PARCEL ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE ZONING LAND USE N0. OF LOTS ACREAGE DU/AC COMMON GREENS COMMON GREEN ACREAGE % OF OPEN SPACE PHASE I, SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 66 32.81 2.01 2 2.78 8.5 PHASE I, SECTION 2 N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 95 69.67 1.36 4 13.35 19.2 PHASE 2, SECTION I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 32 16.81 1.90 1 0.78 4.6 PHASE 2. SECTION 2 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 55 41.85 1.31 3 7.18 17.2 BRENWYCK N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 56 27.63 2.03 2 5.24 19.0 WYNDSOR CREEK I N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 40.74 2.06 3 5.02 12.3 GIENDOVER N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 53 38.86 1.36 3 7.23 18.6 ESTATES N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 30 22.78 1.32 3 4.72 20.7 VILLAGE A, PHASE 3 N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 5 5.7 0.88 0 0 0 CRESCENT ROYALE N/A PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 155 48.21 3.22 13 7.15 14.8 STRATHMORE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 109 61.50 1.77 3 2.53 4.1 WYNDSOR GROVE N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL III 51.86 2.14 4 6.71 12.9 BRENWYCK II N/A PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 112 44.78 2.50 6 1.33 3.0 VILLAGE 'H' SUMMER 1999 PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 225 91.17 2.47 5 3.99 4.4 VILLAGE '1' * SUMMER 1997 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 145 61.01 2.37 5 5.09 0.8 VILLAGE 'J' SPRING 1998 PO 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 84 56.81 1.48 7 5.4 10.0 WYNOSOR CREEK II SPRING 1998 PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 26 15.93 1.63 4 2.9 18.0 SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1443 728.12 1.98 68 81.41 11.2 GOLF COURSE --- 148.73 --- --- 148.78 --- CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USE) --- 12.61 --- --- --- --- SUBTOTAL GOLF COURSE --- 161.34 --- --- 148.73 --- PHASE 5 C-2 USES PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 10.69 --- --- --- --- PHASE I C-2 USE PD 480-OIC RESIDENTIAL 2 6.04 --- --- --- --- SCHOOL SITE PD 480-01C RESIDENTIAL 1 17.42 --- --- --- --- GRAND TOTAL 1448 923.61 1.56 68 230.14 24.9 r 1 I I - . "'1 *VIL GE 'I' INCLUDES BYRON NELSON PARKWAY 1 (� I 6 9 2 ,_ - _.. t. T r j- r ,I - �`� - 1 tP 42 1 I 1 Q r J r l 1 �I 3 ! F, - - 22 \/ I y.,.� J _, f , �r \ � �.. % NOTES: , I j I ,' ) I I t \ s i 1 1 - - ; I / I -_ 3 4 t I `1 I L 2 : i _ i 1 I , • : - I Z \ i : I i' ::1;, I. EXIST NG ZON NG: RESIDENTIAL .U.D. 80 0 C 1 .,� \ ' ;I , O 44 n 2 t ; ! ' '" ,,% == "' N ITY R SIDENTIAL ---- I - . - -- - -- - - EXISTING LAND DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DE S E ]' -- - - -- - i- . - W - ! ---- LOT ,:BL _ - - - ,; - T DEVELO ME NT m z _ _ _- - 2 E _, 4N 13 �` \ - ` _ .. LDING SETBACK LINES SHALL BE PER H P ,. I, d� z 1 _ _ _ / � \ - \ `� __- �`�__ - _ _ _ °c --. v\ - ALL BUI ;, ` - � ,` . -ll T THI MITTAL. _, , { 1v _ ` _ _ RE CATIONS ATTACHED 0 S SUB -I, - , W� 1 U _ _ �O �5 ' " _ - - \ - - - i �- c �' ,, 1 . G Q\ \' - \ o \ oo \' 2 \ r r ; ii/ \ \ ,''i j{' i\ ( \ a:D :/C 3. VILLAGE J INCLUDES ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, COMMON GREENS J I , 1 a - s\ 33 \ s ,' \� �.� --�;, \ ,� AN RIGHT-OF-WAYS. ` _ - _ - - a� �' - .. ��.- , , - f. , - to r _ice' -`// / ; D <\ i �... P.. 'i /1 /J - (;: -y s / -. TIMARR - /. m - g _ �' - \ _ B:E. \ - - - I t : --�.. _ ;! i HA NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN \ s�- 6'- -, ;� � ; -., GOLF COURSE 1) ) >:m i , / 4• SCREENING FENCES AND WALLS S LL 4� I / �c J r -- - % ( A A LIDE 2986- ` ._ _ c� 0 1 _- I HT TRIANGLES OR VISIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC I _ - _ - - ,1 9 a _� \ 9 F -- S \ 1 S G -_ \�\ �= . �_\:- N R \ P % {,� \ I 11 \ F s -J zl 0 S . E SEC 1 / 1- ---- -- ,'- ; ; `� '�. . _, ; } �;. �, o ZONED: PUD 480.r-OIC --�_ --�\ _ �� T T .v 4, , 1 �, UM y D NSITY RESIDENTIAL % \- r� `� LL \ i ''. _ / _LUD: MEDI E \ ,-', 5. ALL COMMON GREEN AREAS ARE TO BE COMMON AREAS OWNED 1 �� , \• - 3 �'\ C- ( r? � �,_ j > �, > AN MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION. 1 1 i / _ i 15 e _ _I. /f/ - � _-'/ `I I o _ \ g 1 - o _ ' a _- _ 1 .� -- �. � = ��- ) N55 54 42 E l - , ; t 9 7 --_ 35 B.L.\ \ ! I Q 5 �' '� t T R M V E D. -c' 2__ }I _ L O7'_ 6. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE 0 BE E 0 q _j I • I - G- R i �/' /3 . 1 v ' C )277 , - - '/ /=- \! _ _ ,\ NS 3 4 '' S E K _ 1 t .'y 1 __- -- h \ i� (. =_ I, I I I I w - J I \ ! - , �, c. _ _ �, r 1 'h 0 - = \ I LiJ - \ 6 m: i �, . �� U.E _. _. 1 9 , _ I _ �- / -,/ - \ _ K \\ �_ +I ' rn � .- � J -- - 09 1 II �, 1. \ , \ r N I, !1 _ / N.- N t a / + � Z1 '324 37 -- 20 B.L. 1 I E - \\ = - _ ! 38 C - -�' , v ` _ i •. , - - _ , _ - 1 _ 1 I -- - ( o , , 4 F _ l - - _ - - - - --I _ ,. ` - - _ , \ _ __ �, _ ' / •- _ / I - �- _ "k ' + 0 - 6 TH MAXIMUM GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN t % A' ' - \ \ _J: 'Y - / , 1 \ A 3 - \ - - - - `n ^� I ^ ` \�. O i THE VILLAGE J ,INCLUDING COMMON GREENS IS 1.48 DU/AC. /. _ _ \ - Y _ __ ILA R IN -�-� s� -• U - I NATI N FR M CITY MASTER PLAN ' �.- _' / \ r y9 �5, I ,_ ,. / 1 t - / y 56 50 R!W_ (3 B.B L.U.D. LAND USE DES G 0 0 / / _ Q 2 - n , roE �: _ tD _� _ - \ ,/r , \\ / \ r, s / , O� .L. + ` 15 B }1 �,� , ,, - i '� LA c I . ____. \e . • ) B. - " ,_) vi '\ �;v SING r , ` �, , _ • VlA1�IA E 1yIDTH ! _ _ , �\ U, r )) � ( \_ - i I - T H OF EVE PMENT .:, 1 � � \ \ ... � , , � �.• �-.; _.---- � � lo' u. „\ AN T IC IP A EDUL E D L 0 � 6 5 �. \ , \ �_ \ I 1 ' / 22 3/,�. 1 k -- . \. \ \ c1 - v :: � / 1 -` _- / - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION j \ \ \ . 1 / `\ ` to j �^ r - -. - 24 - 1 \\ \ \-- - 8 kn y• - -- ,.. Q - _ L 7 SUMMER 998 _ I _ ti I ; E �.,:y FALL 199 ,, \ , h , % \ \ ( / YARFA$LE WID- o _Q- - __� >; -- 36 - \ \. s --- -_ - - - \ ) I .__ - - \\.� \ \ s- D.E. �/ ; h - ,- - �: I \ - �. - - COM ON EN f - I , ti ,.. it \ -- V - l = - --- T s 4 I \ (` t\\, S \ 6' �:° Q �i I'' S=B. I� _\ �e . �(,. - 5 =91,8 7'; �� N � G- fi2 . t f 9 _ �- - ��\ , ,` .p I ` C34 �i • \ 1 -'� \ �.' s� 17 - ,. - - - -� a TIMARRON ADDITION / , - _:- \ \__ �i EXIST.lS'tf.E �, \ r ,- � � � �' -. .. , � ., - .'9 N T R Y A L E L l �� 7 \�r f s1 a CRESCE 0 . � , \�. \ T - VOL.11558 PG. 67T a� IO � \ ;J - - - •, I CAB. A, SLIDE 262 .� - : 25 B.L. 18 f , ( , 'q �' o ` - N + �/ o NE _ -- - -- _ �" /� PRT"GT �I' N N l - ,> - �. , - ONED• PUD 480 OIC PRELIMINARY PLAT //j/%,,.'•\ 1 \.\ \ \\ \ 1 r IAA N - L ` . / .TV y ; _-._ / ^ .- i.;l Z 4 \ 'f LUD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL \� t� FAQ--- --', - SS8 38 35 w F -\ •�. ,� N , / / �►, `` " •: 12 TIMARRON ADDITIGN M - �50 W I .56 6� �/ , ,\ 1 I .- _ 40 62 3 , \\,' - -\. _ . 1 \ _ 6 37 21. \ \ \ \o. 2 S� �Y . : \ ` \ .. 4 - S \ I i VILLAGE J ✓ h. it j,a � 0•' a' W 2 \ � 6 \ _ U. , ITS N - -� - J L 2 i E f „ H TIMAR ON,,: AD 0 \ \� �., , S N46 42 32 W � M N GREE � � 1� � , T OUT OF T E �% \ _ - •�3 - 1 PHASE 2 SE ION 2A`% (^ - -- ��, - - \\ \; ; r 7.0 r �(' ;� TRA T N0. I037 0 \ \ / '� '� �,; HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABS C T NT CREEK \ - 1 �\ / i • --- - % A �� F. 5,2 8 - 92 TAT S A BE - ,. _ N r - 6 5' 9 ES E r A i I I 7q - - 233` CAB. A, SLIDE 1711 �'' L --- _ - \, / ,. 6� A� �/ OT I,_ BLOCK i O Jr �`� /;' % %I =rI O�EI ORTH & TT IN THE N5 RR N 9 PRTCT } < �� TIMA 0 / /� •- r. ,��J:/ 5URV ABSTRACT N0. 7 7 J l ( it oo r- • P D 480-OIC ' r 1 20.65' I ,,-' - `' 1� \ �� i' ZONED. U GOLF COURSE ., _1 � / '\ \\, \r�,)r f, M DAVENPORT SURVEY- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS \� -�� 89 03 22 W I 986 �'.I w , LUD. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -1 ' - C B. A, _ \� \ �I v n - �''� ' 32.88' A SL DE 2 f, j :1 � BSTRACT N�. =��\ i' v I PRTCT % I m 14 ACRES/ 84 LOTS K i' ZONED: PUD 4. OIC� \ (, N 71 28 50 W , r I� - \� \\ GREENS o �6 46'1, \ : l -'i - 7 COMMON \. /_ _LUD. MEDIUM DENStT RESIDEN L \ -a`; 1 ,q z, / 4 -� (38.46 21.33 � 5�j6.-: -' , / f - N z I: ,; ��/ �, t ;. a *_ u-' -. •F �� :ice._ , ` OWNER/DEVELOPER. WESTERRA-TIMARRON L.P. \ '� - \ I / `\ �.. V 1\\ - �` it �- _.� �� , r`� \ (�, . V �} y �„ \\ .; G v \ i \ G \ O� ' �... - l ... _ / \\ ^ /^ G�� -_ \Y ° �= . \,\ �,\ \ ) - �* _ - x. / r/ �-� �- ( ( .\ � , , J ' , - ( : �, \ .-� _ , _ 1 f� 7905 W. VIRGINIA A KW McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 (972) 529-5988 FAX (972) 529-5540 ENGINEER: CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 DALLAS,TEXAS 75247 (214) 638-0145 FAX (214) 638-0447 APRIL, 1997 CASE NO. LA 9 f-U5 r t &ts Juts- ti�ccjdvlt Z 0 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET 1'=100' PROJECT LOCATION L_%. �vtr tr,n� __SAXON ��TRA/C LV F <*�(16 L1� FL14�FL1� F�1� FLIl s---- N 84-33'42- W N �9 FL21 F COMMON GREEN gg sa.2s �op-�-L2��__`BLOCK 55, LOT 22 TBL❑CK 12 64 63 62 61 60 i 100 YEAR I FLOODWAY LINE LIMITS OF awl s J, 100 YEAR FLOODWAY '.-WI (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW 011 M. LIMITS OF Io i o �I 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN v 6.43 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW 40.37 E:� Q 5.32 v L I n l L n FLOODPLAIN & FLOODWAY DETAIL APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT - I I TIMARRON ADDITION, PHASE 5 � 1 � 1 � 8 �� 11 ' ' ROCKER FAMILY ' �- S 71°07'05" E WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. 11 11 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I 71.69 VOL. 12612, PAGE 1631 , 1 VOL. 10432, PG. 1170 10 D.R.T,C.T. 1 D.R.T.C.T. , 20.sp >,7 1 I� I >>.p2 2 1 �, LIMITS OF >.y8 S 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ' ;' 13 !'V 84 �, %J 3 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW) 11063 IF o �p'U. pQ 25• 53'36" , 1 1 �, 12 o E 25' f N 67° 44 36" E 4p \ c, 10665 IF 1 1 o m 83 65 ` 522) 78.16 5 ` 4g 38.4S \ �11340 SF �� 10 Of�i '>8 0 2 S 87' 51 '53" E �� LIMITS OF > o r� ., 77.27 100 YEAR FLOODWAY TIMARRON ADDITION y.00 'tee. � 0 � 1 1 �� ,�5' l '�8 p I ` �, (FULLY DEVELOPED Flow) BRYSON SQUARE P 0 84.pp 170 �11515 SF 'IV 10 ekpCK ->80 20.00 y \ J PHASE ONE s > o 0 > > 5 r^ o o S i CAB. A, SLD. 3444 �8.pp 3'36., 22655 86\�, �% 10533 sF �,osg IF �' /0 �; i �o'�� 01 P.R.T.C.T. \ f N78. 93 r , ^ o <,r l `sue_ I 4 0 / d-1 1 16533 IF �p a >8. y9 > 1 0,2411 r \ <n 8 M 1 11471 IF N r 0 6 6p Op4 f >8 p �5' 10992 SF rrr IV) p1 1 co 6 ul\ Mi 6 2 ^I ro 7 �nl In MIN FF> ` w <" o`N 12 N FF 8, co 5` 2>3 Z > 10' �' 1N of 1 1 cb ') 610_ r 7 ` 7 8_ �Je l r� 1_,w 613. 0 Wo 10579 IF : �O a MiN F �8 •53'36„ S o2 5-33`r 10,0c 0 UEyi I- Z51 � ' \; L8 / 13 V(o - s10 >F. �� _ f \ 8o g 5'--1 o L 6 \ >g 11407 SF V C N) 6 N FF �8.�0\ 3?' 0� �R�� 9 9 4 _J I`t� 4 �_ 1- D=131'41 14" 34-` ��p0. � �1o14R562 F ^ 0.> 67N F -2800 4�� 70.90 II �o R=50.00 -� 2 "� 15R rn o.> MiN 6 � CIO i "'1 L=1 1 4.92 9 C22 JI �' T=1 1 1 .48 r FF 8 v 6j0.> 3 9.7g 28 - o; 16R ^ M �8- 02_ C23 I I LC=91 .24 r r 69 2052 S g�. �8. 10 ;h3 5F r 1 7R cV rn 6jo jF 3 ,SIN` 3 78 02-- < i 82.02--- 41 CB=S 03'36 41" E FF I D=06' 1 5'47" y 0 3 43" ) O �' cy 610. 7 ' MIN FF. MIN FF. 1I I m R=865.00 f 8.1p ' `" a� 18R 0 19R N b10.7 0 610.7 ;; i� WESTERRA TIMARRON, P. 68 �q 1158a SF ^� ^� 21 R DETAIL "A' T=47.32 \ W/� N DE S 8 09 C 11174 sF o 20Rr ' N O99U.E - �j I VOL. 12612, PAGE 1 631 1106114 `i -� D.R.T.C.T. F 4 39' 8j. BLOCK O V•9955 P.303 , w LC= 9,4. 51 6 7 '� �' _ _ �" 60 � 55 I I CB=N 55'46 05 W ,LOT 22 `� COMMON - 89'06 88 07 cn i S 00'25'05" E ' GREEN 58 5 84'22'56" E 134.52 125.00 N 52'38'11" W ----- `� - -- -- --- -----S 88'09'36 E T\ 95.92 .' I �' - _ _ _ - - 66 7.5' U.E. F- - - N�89'26 44 W - 431.04 - ��, i A I 10' U.E. / D 36'48'33" 65 i\ 6.69 R=185.00 ' o i i � - TIMARRON ADDITION _ 64 , l 0 63 6:. 61 E 59 BRENWYCK PHASE 2 LT=61.85 , N i is LIMITS OF CAB. A, SLD. 2152 T=61.56 r I 100 YEAR FLOODWAY ` \� P.R.T.C.T. ,� 82 (FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW) �\ \ CB=N 71'02 28 W ---- - -- ASHLEIGH LANE (50' R.O.W.) BOUNDARY LINE DATA LINE BEARING DISTANCE 19 S 27'46'04" F 35.22 BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC TANGENT BEARING CHORD C22 1733'08" 1000.00 306.34 154.38 S 80'40'10" E 305.15 C23 28' 19'20" 50.00 24.72 12.62 N 76'23'36" E 24.46 LEGEND: CG COMMON GREEN CIRF CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND IRF IRON ROD FOUND CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET BL BUILDING LINE UE UTILITY EASEMENT DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT D&UE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT MIN FF. MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION ® 10' X 10' UTILITY EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT ® 20' X 20' UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT LINE DATA LINE BEARING DISTANCE EL1 N 88'09'36" W 134.52 EL2 N 84'22'56" W 177.12 EL3 N 74'39' 17" W 165.69 EL4 N 69'03'43" W 234.29 EL5 S 18*06'24" W 20.52 EL6 N 05' 15' 14" E 26.88 EL7 N 09'43'27" E 35.01 EL8 N 14' 1 1 '40" E 43.65 EL9 N 18'06'24" E 67.95 EL10 N 18'06'24" E 76.99 EL11 N 18*06'24" E 61.84 EL12 N 18*06'24" E 38.56 EL13 S 19'00'05" E 154.65 EL14 S 03'36'32" E 201.89 EL15 S 18'44'06" E 30.49 EL16 N 56'37'24" W 33.91 EL17 N 52'51'11" W 40.81 EL18rN 35'24'41 E 38.7t FLOOD LINE DATA IINE BEARING DISTANCE FL1 N 71'38'25" W 12.44 FL2 N 40'52'58" W 21.19 FL3 N 28'41'17" W 16.69 FL4 S 86'55'03" W 3.87 FL5 S 10'01'10" W 7.89 FL6 S 16*52'31" W 12.96 FL7 S 11'35'36" E 68.93 FL8 S 0707'40" E 47.78 FL9 S 03'45'56" E 32.24 FL10 S 62'27'23" W 10.98 FL11 N 8743'22" W 53.98 FL12 N 78'02'57" W 56.57 FL 1 3 N 87' 1 4' 1 7" W 26.09 FLOOD LINE DATA LINE BEARING DISTANCE FL14 S 89'23'30" W 44.80 FL15 N 83'27'24" W 23.86 FL16 N 70'01'49" W 21.77 FL17 S 65'13'31" W 7.92 F1_18 N 37'33'33" W 22.53 FL19 S 47'02'24" E 16.75 FL20 S 76'37'14" E 10.25 FL21 S 86'56'32" E 19.93 FL22 S 74'37'18" E 30.59 FL23 S 78'32'55" E 71.62 FL24 S 04'02'18" W 47.75 FL25 S 00' 12' 14" E 79.50 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION WHEREAS WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION), ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED IT'S DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT IS THE SOLE OWNER OF A 2.880 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING ALL OF LOTS 14 THROUGH 21, BLOCK 55 AND A VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF THE FINAL PLAT OF TIMARRON ADDITION, BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 3444 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R.T.C.T.). SAID 2.880 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLOCK 55 OF SAID TIMARRON ADDITION, BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14, BLOCK 55, AND BEING IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) LINE OF SAXON TRAIL (50' R.O.W.), RECORDED BY SAID FINAL PLAT; THENCE ALONG SAID R.O.W. LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES AND DISTANCES: S 71'53'36" E, A DISTANCE OF 321.74 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 17'33'08", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S 80'40'10" E A DISTANCE OF 305.15 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 306.34 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 28719'20", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 76'23'36" E A DISTANCE OF 24.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.72 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 21, BLOCK 55, SAID POINT BEING IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, BLOCK 55 AND SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BEING THE COMMON EAST LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES: S 27'46'04" E, A DISTANCE OF 35.22 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; S 00'25'05" E, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FINAL PLAT AND SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FINAL PLAT AND OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BEING THE COMMON NORTH LINE OF TIMARRON ADDITION, BRENWYCK PHASE 2, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2152, P.R.T.C.T., THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 89'26'44" W. A DISTANCE OF 431.04 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 185.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 36'48'33", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 71-02-287 w A DISTANCE OF 116.82 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.85 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; N 52*38'11" W, A DISTANCE OF 95.92 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR CORNER; ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 865.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 0615'47", A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 55'46'05" W A DISTANCE OF 94.51 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 94.55 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK 55, SAID POINT BEING THE MOST WESTERLY SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT; THENCE N 18'06'24" E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK 55, BEING THE COMMON WEST LINE OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND SAID LOT 14, BLOCK 55, A DISTANCE OF 154.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 2.880 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION DATE CITY SECRETARY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DATE CITY SECRETARY NOW, THEREFORE, KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P., ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED IT'S DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, DOES HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAT REVISION DESIGNATING THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY AS LOTS 14R THRU 21 R, BLOCK 55 AND COMMON GREEN 58, TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND I (WE) DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC'S USE THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN THEREON. WITNESS MY (OUR) HAND(S) AT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THIS THE ____ DAY OF_________ 1997. AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED STEVE YETTS, AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P., KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED, AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED, AND AS THE ACT AND DEED OF WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS ------- DAY OF___________ 1997, NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS JERRY L. FULLER it,:te MY COMMISSION EXPIRES August 5, 2001 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, GARY S. VEDRO REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION PLAT SHOWN HEREON ACCURATELY REPRESENTS THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS DETERMINED BY A SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND, UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, AND 5/8 INCH IRON RODS CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" HAVE BEEN SET AT ALL SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY CORNERS AND UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, AT POINTS OF CURVE ALONG DEDICATED RIGHTS - OF -WAY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE MONUMENTS OR MARKS SET, OR FOUND, ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE RETRACTMENT. DATED RP-VIP'\A/ Alvin rnnAnA�:_nlT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR NUMBER 4934 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY of BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED GARY S. VEDRO, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS DAY OF______________ 1997. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS COMMISSION EXPIRES: PLAT REVISION NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT REVISION IS THE FOLLOWING: 1.) ADJUST THE SOUTH LOT LINE OF LOTS 14 THRU 21, BLOCK 55. 2.) DESIGNATE AREA SOUTH OF REVISED SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 14 THRU 21, BLOCK 55, AS COMMON COMMON GREEN 58. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1.) ALL CORNERS ARE 5/8" IRON RODS CAPPED "CARTER & BURGESS" SET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.) BEARING BASIS IS THE SOUTH LINE OF TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE, PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 3444, P.R.T.C.T. 3.) B.M. DISC AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BOX CULVERT 10.5' SOUTH OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD 1300' t EAST OF HIGHLAND OAKS CIRCLE STAMPED TARRANT COUNTY ELEV.=606.87. DEVELOPER'S NOTES: 1.) THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE PLAT IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN, MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA. 2.) ALL COMMON GREEN AREAS ARE TO BE PRIVATE COMMON AREAS DEDICATED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 3.) ALL LOTS WITH THIS PLAT ARE SUBJECT TO TIMARRON PHASE 5, DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. 4.) ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE REMOVED. 5.) SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS. A PLAT REVISION OF LOTS 14R THRU 21R, BLOCK 55 AND COMMON GREEN 58 TIMARRON ADDITION BRYSON SQUARE PHASE ONE OUT OF THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ,J3 8 RESIDENTIAL LOTS / 1 COMMON GREEN 2.880 ACRES OWNER DEVELOPER: WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. 7605 VIRGINIA PARKWAY McKINNEY, TEXAS 75070 (972) 529-5988 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: CEOA=- Carter Burgess CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 DALLAS, TX 75247-4961 (214) 638-0145 Z Ld N0 af of Q � t 0 d' • (0 CL Lf�N/ W 0 Ld C) Z LLJ Q THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET Fil F Nn. MAY 1997 Tue May 27 14:15:36 1997 n-\ IOP\ TIAAARRON\ QF771C1(li\ (DA\ -)inDIDAn1 ea9� 649- — r 1 0 Owner: Christ Men's Netwc Vol. Pg. Zoning. S-P LUD: Mixed 1 4 t1 Own Countryside ible Church Zoning: CS Public/Semi-public / Fie Hydrant / / I Owner: A.J. Posey Vol. 5064 Pg. 365 0 Zoning: AG LUD: Low Density Residential Site Plan b SITE PLAN APPLICATION F. J I 1irVN14.A n � , / Fire . ydrant / b for 2935 Everest Lane North i I �•a, Plymouth,Minnesota 55447 E—Mail: Voice: (612) 476-4133CHPIS�IAN MEN'SNETWORK Fax/Data: (612) 404-9317 1 / Owner's Representative: e / � ' Integrity Development o<�v / Jim Halek / Lot 2R1, Block B 14869 Manitou Road Ravenaux Village Prior Lake, Minnesota 553 72 e Phone: 612.440.3 O An Addition to the City of 8' High / Consultant: Monument S 0 u t h l a k e Sim / Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706 / ,92f-0" �.6• � t '' 10, Tarrant County, Texas July 1996 1P 00 3.97 Acres Site Plan for SP1 Zoning for Christian Men's Network Certifications: Request for Variance to Delete Requirement for 6'-0" High weer: Lee d Fence Along South and Portion of East Property Line oning: OV LU . Mixe"se a, / owner: Owner's Representative: Architect: Surveyor: Owner: Christian Men's Network Integrity Development ArchTech, Ltd. Ward Surveying Company 253 Grass I �i /' 1001 West Euless Blvd., Suite 104 14869 Manitou Road Plymouth Everest Lane P.O. Box h TX i Plymouth MN 55447 Fort Worth TX 78118 I+ / i Euless TX 76040 Prior Lake MN 55372 y: (817) 283-2898 (612) 440-3000 18121 478.4133 t8171 281-5411 Future 64 Parkin)y' / Owner: A.J. Posey / Vol. 8797 Pg. 353 Zoning: AG LUD: Low Density Residential Scale: V=30'-0" R FA Site Data Summary Chart dRo / Phase 1 Topic Existing i 8-P-1 8-P-1 11 Zoning 2) Acreage 3.98 3.97 LIJ NCO 3 Lots 1 1 loe / 1 4) Building Coverage 0% 4.43% — GAA 51 Development Schedule N/A 1996 / a) Loading Required N/A 0 Berth 7) Loading Provided N/A 1 Berth 8) Parking Required N/A 30 stalls i 91 Parking Provided N/A 30 Stalls Standard Stalls N/A 28 Stalls / Disabled Stalls N/A 2 Stalls z 0 10) Open Space (Areal 172,738 93. 164,847 s.f. 1� � 111 Open Space IXI 100X 95.58X � / / , 6 121 Building Data 1< 1 Story a► Height (Stories) 0 b) Height (Feet) 0 20'-0" 644 c) Floor Area 0 7,650 s.f. 131 Uses - Owner: al Office 7,850 s.f. � E.J. Bryant bl Recording Studio 0 s.f. � Vol. 18 Pg. 380 cl Chapel/Training 0 s.f. Zoning: AG L.U.D.: Mixed Use loll h 14) Sufferyard Chart Canopy Accent ALA 3 Bufferyard Required Provided Trees trees Shrubs n None 10'-A 43) -(el 423) 0 say North - 286 c East - 219' S'-A 10'-D 2181 41111 181331 ' c East - 315.5' S'-A 20'-Fix 3171 e051 25(20) ' South - 380' 10'-C 20'-F1x 11(10) 1808) 44(38) 20 -Ftx 14f111 151181 581321 8a6 West - 4l14' 10'-C ' Proposed Plantings in Parenthesis t 1, x : Required Plants Reduced by 20% for 20" Sufferyard Width 131 ' Required Interior Landscape Plantings Canopy Accent Bide Yard Sufferyard Trees trees Shrubs Groundcover �T Phase I Area Req'd. = 2,295 s.f. M1 4 8 38 230 s.f. Protect No.: 95050 Date: zu " " 19115 Prepared By: July Bufferya er Reviewed BY: sPB b� File Name: No i' l Script: Drainage & Utility Easement Location Map General Notes Revisions: N4P1. Parking area and drives shall be paved with aspha;tic concrete (bituminous) surfacing 2. Building and parking security lighting shall be provided in conformance with the ordinance • and shall be equipped with cut-off shields to prevent glare from extending beyond .l► property lines. Pole mounted lighting shall be maximum 20'-0" poles. 3. Walls and fences shall be constructed in conformance with the ordinance. Sheet Title 4. No exterior storage of goods, products, or materials is permitted. 5. No exiting driveway or street intersection R.O. W.'s located within 100'-0" Site Plan for S P 1 Ravenaux of proposed deiveway. ODr. a 6. sP ZoningIs based on all requirements of C8 Zoning District except as amended. Zoning for Christian v e 7. Benchmark El. = 842.28' NGVD: Railroad sppce in 12" an tree 150' south 8 100'+/- west Men's Network of the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block A, Ravenaux VNlage. O Project Sheet Number s. Site 8. No External Auditory Devices are intended to be utilized with the exception of Emergency = Alarm Devices. Highland 2 5' 50' 75' 10 0' i 1- AGAPE AREAS Q rARDs WCES s EXITS I'LD/NGS 'cI C APPIEC >IGAPPEO i SPACES jw NTEO N1C*4 j�r I ar r-(.4TJOly` GQPT, ?4?5 E Southlaks t31vd Suits 150 5outhlake, Texas 76092 TeL (0/'7) 4W - 4?00 Fox, (0/7) 4M-5?57 Q -� TUILN r-yxTlr'=r A-D PARM&M ?425 E. South/aks Blvd., Suite /5® ,;outhiake. Texas '6092 rel.: (017,14M-4200 da DESCRIPTION T FASTER SURYEr Abstract No. 474, situated about 17 4& degrees east from the courthouse " Fort Worth, the Ot of Tarrant county, Texast and embracing a portion or acres tract doocrribed in the deed to R-G- Lyford y PaCounty In volume t0?a nd s particular descrbedasoowa Deed at a 5/8' Iron set for the southwest corner of the tract 9In voiuMe e 1602 o� to ths State of, Texas said, Dsed eac-ords in he recorded line Of the Mew NOM NOW pow NOW - , ,. i P1l7rO�i► , ry ,, . ♦ rPOW DEVICE e - --- , -- _ �.orwr+ yr r - • s Alkw -- jaw b ro. OWN om PHAM 11 - ll49WR LANDSCAM MOW CRAV �,4M AMA f OF AMA N CAOoY A00W jQ00V�C0VM (Sa OrU Flv�'w'r on S" rib it EW powwow N� r „ 76/ CONSULTANTS Architect Zvi 1 !AYES /NG. H�C 2045 N. Highway 360 sulte 0160 5701-C MiaWay Road Grand Prairie, rx 75050 Ft. Worth, TX. 761/7 Tel.: (817> 640-ClOe Tel.: (017) 031-7711 Fax: (8/7l 633-3309 Fox: (Ol7l d311-6 " • • h' .1�• �L.�►A1M- b MORM MMA7.11711V r 77 SITE DATA _ RLMSED SITE PLAN FOR GEOROE TO" PARK SOUTIRA CIF, TARRANT CO., TEXAS PREPARATION DATE: 04/22/97 u MM ZONED: C-2 PROPOSED ZONING C-2 LAND USE DESZGNATION� MIXED _ — LM I p MAW H E anV40 - P&M I 'DOTAL -_-- LAND AREA: 1310 A01 ES 57,4Jm �� F l74i ACRES 75 840 5F 3.059 ACRES L33,25m SF PARKING MEOD: 3? 64 96 1�GPAI4�UNG Pl�VD: 33 67 At4ND/CAPPff0 Pis AMD: 2 3 /i/.vyllrnN�!-lam✓ /`loVGil--i�✓VDi 2 3 ill VAN .4 TOTAL SPACES PROVD: 35 70 S/rE COVERAGE AREA: 5752 SF 21120 9F 26072 OF ---- - 517V COVERAGE PERCENrACsE: 101.E ?7B�i 20.2Z PAVM46 AREA: fbM2 SF 30vpbi8 SF 47350 - -.--- PAVING PERCENTAGE: 29.4t 4C,4% 35.7* 203 ass R to Z' r AREA OF OPEN SPACE 34776 SF 24052 SF 5M26 5F c7 t' PERCENTAGE OPEN SPACE 60Ji� 3J u AMA OF OUTS/DE STORAW O SG2 Fr 0 3Q f7: O JQ x OF Out5/DE STORAGE O Sa FT. 08Q FT ®St2 FT PI®OPl iED BLDG. 3F KM7 9F 24IS3 OF -- �. MA45FR OF STORIES 2 1 400 acres tract. N-1 BLDG. NE/GNt 37`-8' puth 7P degrees-40 minutes-Ci seconds east along the of the said State of Texas tract for the south right of ,f Southtake Boulevard, 337-60/100 feet to a 5/8' iron 1p southeast cOrr►er Ot he said State of Texas tract in line or the 1-222/JCC0 acres tract described in the the Clty Of g0uthiake recorded in volume BI06, page 1279 Id Deed Records. ;Vth, along the West line of the said 1-222/1000 acres 9-15/1®Z' feet to a 5/0' iron recovered for a reentrant r the said 1-222/1000 acres tract Guth $9 degrees-36 minutes West, along' a north line or the 2/1000 acres tract, IM � aid 1???to a , iron �estract. for Orly northwest corner' or outh, along the west line of the said 1-222/~ acres e Fast to a 5/8' ron recovered for the southwest corner aid 1-222/10g@0 acres tract. oath 89 degrees-36 minutes tweet along the south 11ne of 5/8' Iron set --- Uw -_ �... PRnP06ED FLOOR AREAS OFFICE USE OFFICE USE OFFICE. s _ ANTIC/DATED CONST SCHEDULE MAY -eel 97 OCT. -96 74V1Ie0 acres tract. J38-6®'1,� e" .Fact. ►outhwest comes of ihre said - s� , ��' '�' s� 1 I L �, north no degrees -no minutes -53 seconds west, a /Ong the t or the said 7-1®/I@0 acres tract 912-401Aee feet to e or beginning and containing 5-434/10" acres, w g N E REVBE0 SITE PLAN FM LOT- L BLOCK 4 GEORGEnOWN PARK SCALE: 1' - 4C,-®' m d on t.- ground Novembeor 8. 1995. 220' l.AW rk PFd.4aE 4046 1.1G�U LARD E. GARR _W LOT J MOCK 1 i kff4 iT ;bL 809! PAGE 149C (APPROVED FINAL FLAT ' A u v M EAO&IR woo PINCZ 10' L OR- Tic. � acC�se EAd�°B�lt; I a' T sciQEt�rn B.�1e ryrE "' ZONED C3 - . - ZONED AG• LAND USE pESIGN,ATION: MIXED 5 ft. LlE uttOp rFr�r.� TIC.YV: MILD - - -- - - - - MN6 A�DAcrc LAND USE DESIGNA vier f MAP -14 1709 _500kLAKE W LOCKTM .......,....._.._...._.._.._. _ _, __ _.. -- -- _. __ ._. __ __ ._ __- -- -- - -_ - -- -- --- -- - -- -- -- - -__, - - ----------- ----- --------__...__ __ _-.__.____ .. ________•-___---- -_ ~__-_-_--- _� --_: ;_". ____ _ -- -- -____ Jam/ -- -" �I + d' HEIGHT STONE adaL1_ ' � � \� � !i ' � r G,4VALL/N0 hROPERTIES LTD. 12' x ii5' M46fl �\ r VOL. 1?I?3. PAGE ?18 RECEI-rAGLE �o �a# rp4 rxA rV4 I ; -! / ZGWEO C3 REW L. JAl•!E5 JR +I + • I i , , T ► I # it gyp ,' ; l / L ANO USE DE.416 /OIJ: MIXED �' LAND5G41'E � b , anew ,� -;.::. s,Rur � * '� � * l �A JAMES t'rFE Fi aeio v ea - ---- * * .9 4 AM LION OAKS SUB0/V/S1ON + ' wry tAr PHASE „'_ 1 29 PAGE 39 21�1@ OFF%GET� DING 1_ ,/ l l ^® l STATE OF ItXAS ,A B' S1DB FARO IrAAr , ,•Ace.. a tL + "� , t ,� DUlk r>#NG sEr SACK -----1 � ! VOL . 98®4,' PAGE 2061 DESIGNATION: LOW DENSi T l' ` _ , - + �0� - - - - - - - - - — 1- #73 rR ----- w � 6 LANDtIGAPE t - °' `II_- - - - - --t-'-"� --•� ih� M.ti RES/pENTl.4L.TT1'L° 200"' SOUTH 200- 14' S Ord 00'20 W 1ER L IINE 5 LAN06CAM . •.. "` • . "'. ..•. ` 43989' S �d �?®' W • •- B1j:FER * rrE 'A 25' FIIE LANE --- __. -. _. -- - _ - - - - - -- • l l Ti S9d 4v \ \ P GE$ERAL. j4REA FC%R 1r i I PROPOSED '23.19' EXJ$TlNG A WIDE EASE Gry / MQW B'NEN ,4l_ SIGN/ FOR T FIDE 4YORAN76 Ur *r � r � \ `' l � P44M ll � ` t I L /BERr1' BANK F/RE NYDRAN 5 so w,roE ccw-r rav / C�CE99 W . I urri iT' gAyEr�xr YOL /2???. PAGE' 1970 A / D.R T.C. T ZONED C2 LAND USE DESIGNATION: MIXED C/rY OF SOUTHLAKE CEOm3ffrOIIN L/MirED /4 �i ht WILUAMS YOL- OhM PAGE 1605 ✓OL. 973®. PAGE /029 (�` 2 D�i rl�ia..i ` i CS D.RtGT. LOT I �i ZONED: G2 46E 1685 ZONED G5 LAND USE DE5/GNAT/ON: MIXED i-ANO USE DE6iCsNA710N: ESIGNAT/ON: LOW DENSITY i l RESIDENTIAL U.E.-----------------------------------------510E 1'ARpBUILDING PACK- - - CENTER 1. 06 -- - - t • F - ----- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- l_ - - - - - -_.._.._.._......._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._�lS99.75 I r �...._... _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — -- — \ NAME E. f CHARLOTTE J. EATCN ' STATE OF,'TEXAS .r933b, PAGE mll3 D.RT.C.T. ZONED AG / LAND USE DESI(5NATION: MIXED EMIL Y 5NANKL /N ( .4[CsORDON .. NETTLETON l YOL. 6716 PAGE 764 I VOL. 3930, PAGE 117 / / R EGP D U U N 10 1997 ZONED AG I ZONED: AG i LAND USE DESIGNATION: "'XED LAND USE DESiGN,4TiON: MIXED l / ------------------- O M L < x Uj < < Ix CL a o < O rg V V `o W F- IA 0 2 Z I O N U U REVOM 5/7/97 iOB � • 9705 ME DATE -- 4/72l'97— . Marf Boo — REVM 9M PLAN Ka LOI• L MM 1. a®ORGETM PAW gFl Xr NO. A-I �o�. =r)ITnP- K.N. 10:34 4_v. 06,'09/9 DWG. FI _F SCALF: 1 "=40' PRN: ._.__ _. _ REC'V. CHKD: (�v �. (,,---- EXIST. CONTOUR ' w LINES TYP. FUTURE LOT LINE WITH AMENDMENT TO PLAT 1/2"FIR ------------------------ -- If ' ' I - o O R.O. R.O. — — — R.O. � L -��- SPRINKLER VALVE _ CONTROL ROOM -- I BLDG. SETBACK LINE TYP -----_ ---- EXIST. — ----- _ - - _ _ ---- — ' BLDG. EMERGENCY EXITS- - STRUCTURE - - _ ; _ PER TENANT SPACE N , T (PHASE I ) / , I - REQUIRED BY CODE' TYP. PROPOSED NEW- I� I o TAT NOTE: DfO BUFF 'R- I , �i I N I o COMMERCIAL / YARD REQUIREM T I I' I RETAIL BUILDING I F.F. = 642.0' DUE TO SHARED OSS j °- I I� O 1 I ,' (1 STORY, 20'-0" HIGH ACCESS / COMMO € T F.F. = 643.0' 11,900 GROSS SQ. FT.) EL:642.0' 1 II �10 FT DRAIN E S M T --� a► i I I (/)-TYP. BLDG. ENTRANCES - - -- I 1 1 j I I 1'-0" BLDG. STE I it I EL:(43.0' \ PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ---- PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY �- ' (CONCRETE) o (CONCRETE) • II I � I- 1 i o T P. E TRY 1 I P AZ A 6 L61.C EL 641.0 500 6 El H56'-0"C H b 10-0" WIDE TYPE-F1 NOTE: CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT Q) LANDSCAPED BUFFER REAR OF BLDG. PER U.B.0 /� YARD SHOWN SHADED rr^^ STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY EXITING: MIN. 44" WIDE TYP. S 880 5 7' 4 4'' E ------------------ REAR YARD l - ------------- EL-641.0'- - �y------ -Ifff"li __ o VOL 11618 PG 1326 DRTCT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ZONED AG AGRICULTURAL LUD - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 753.77_ (314.03' =- - - -- __N n�r--, \ SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART \ Estimated start of construction: 9-1-97 Estimated construction completion: 3-1-98 Existing Zoning: C-2 Local Retail / Commercail t-- NEB' -REES TYP. \'/2'1�IR EX1Stlnp�b L.U.D.: Medium Density Residential \ , .� . ` —\ �— -- ---- ----- --`---------.-'� ��;------------ Site Gross Acreage: 1.87 A: 81, 360 S.F. --- - �\ 39 ` S 240 :5g'"\ E ' . `� Site Net Acreage: 1.26 A: 54,875 S.F. Required Interior Landscape Area = 50% of � ufz�'SIR Bldg. G.S.F. .5(11,900) = 5,950 S.F. \ \ \ Interior Landscape Area provided = 7,100 S.F. TRASH PSTER REQUIRES .\9n A N 8' 0" IGH, GATED MASO Y '� �� '\ \` \` \ Percentage of Site coverage: = 14.6%O EA FREE NG. ALL, TO BE CON- �/`\ > W STRUC ED 0 A MATERIAL SIN. - '� `\� \� �, ` `, , `' \` Percentage of Pavement: = 36% TO THAT OF HE PRIMARY STIR URE.'�``,�',, �, ' \ ' '`, Area of open ace unemcumbered = 64,460 S.F. =22-56-11 p p ( ) `, \ •', ` .R _ 2 0 0 0' , , DU T R '� �'� �' _ ', \��' ` \ '�+ =10 8 C 9 i,% %% ', �` Percentage of Open Space = 85.4% ,�,= . ,' " , - - ''', �`, �'`, R D B R G S 13'° �91'�,5'2 '�� Outside Storage: N/A , 0% LINE 0 5 0 WIDE TYPE -A ,- , , ��, ` SCAPED \�UFFER - ' ``, C,R D D IS T 10 �, ', Tota1 Building Area = 11,900 G.S.F. CURB YP.- L ,- ` Y D SHOWN SHADED ' \ -- - ------ It`s i� �"--�` '` , �', ' All to be Local Retail Use Total Floor Area = 11,900 G.S.F. Parking spaces required: (1 /200) = 60 h05, _ 0 Al EASEMEN t i Parking spaces provided = 77 Loading spaces required: = 1 I b )D ;� `t 1 _ _ -'�� 't `, �`, �t, 'ti Loading spaces provided: = 1 :FAST . _ _ RESTA p t NEW CONTOUR t _ ' I-z�y b" 30'I o'� I t i Nunmber of Stories 1 (20'-0") ' - 36,_0�� 20,t.01. 190'-0" ,/ D THRL� i _ - , , LINES TYP. ' ' ' — 3 - t I- I rt - — - -- - VOL 11618 PG 1514 6f�T I I II , ' t FOR I 1' ' _ - M 1709- SHADY OAKS LTD Q ll ► I Maximum Height — 5 0 1709 SHADY pAKS LTD., STRAT �I , I I o F ' I II LAND INVESTMENT, INC. GENERAL ' `O ' 24' HIGH H.LD. POLE LIGHTS �i£R I 6 I I I t Il ' I' ! I ' 1 � � � '' 'ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COM CIAL h� I I � 11 PAR EL PARTNERS, 8100 LOMA ALTO RD. ,'fFlfl. LANE ;I i +15'_ " I ,rT WITH SHOE BOX TYPE c� o/ 4 1 1 Ii I ? I } SIR Q ---- � ,_ - r- F 1 R E LANE I i t / 1 SUITE 2Q'8, DALLAS, TX, 75221 , 50 DII� EXT.IRAJ. IDE D. FIXTURES TYP.- - - _ -%" I 5b' Cis. EX1'. R � r 9 / ' II , v , 25 DIN INT. SET K.( - I 1 6� v t Y - � �- 11 ,��, I, -- — -•J--- —r--t ,!' DiA INT. AD.� 11 , I cn 1, 360 12 00 360 iDEG. ---- ,— — — --- --�-- I DEG. i0 12 12 - RAGE COVERAGE CONIJECT TO EX ST. I ' I ' 7.00' a INTERIOR ANDSCAPE 88 57'4E 8" WATER LINE TUB 5L, WN SHADEP AND HAT�HED YP- FOR ADJACENT o PRO ERTY I (PHA E 1) 7 FT WIDE C = /, V 1 ,= i I N ACCESS EMT ■ LIx1D - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL i ' o — BLDG. SETBACK LINE TYP 't -- -- -t 1-------------- --ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL I 18.5''I w i - _ NATURAL SITE 10 FT DRAINAGE ES MT // /�_ 'I i I RAINAGE PATH ED 1T0 E�SEME h! 1 NEW MONUMENT _ t / o I, i u ,il, I�wO t I � I _ _U � t [ J (t " O f'- Ham-- '' � '' , ' 'i Ii; II t ml �i�,j ,'a�W to r I' I 1 W I IjH PROPOSED VARIENCES SUMMARY CHART 1 • Building setback line: at North property line, change from 40'-0" to 20' -0" to match setback line at Phase I of development. 2. Joint Access Easement for Parking spaces along the West property line, Future amendment to Plat. twIV) Lj,�i tj I1 co a i II D ,1 , I, , OU ,. a' C� tom- --- --- --- ---�/ OI - I, Ir J 'i 1 ,' 0 l0- Y -- UN ,' ' T_ Uj —TIE EXIST _ 15'-0" DASHED LINES --r � IN LDG. TYP. - I"' —REPRESENT I I ' t,, O SIDE YD. FUTURE _ PARKING AREA --ALL WEATHER SET OUT PARCEL PLANNING- �i - ---- i- ; o ' J J SURAFCE, ASPHHLT PAVING r} 1 ; ,' ; N , cL = a ( 70 -78 TOTAL SPACES) I I ; '� , ' { a D w -- -631�O O tY „ 1 i i NOTE LESS THEN '' I o0 tl Q t 37 0 I I I I ,' 0.2: CTwO TENTHS) o o III 1 LULJ- - - - o - _ - - --- - - -- ---1 -- ' I (� 6 rn 6 37.5 OPOSED NEW 1 -- --- -----�-- t `--'- ' OF 1 F.C. (FOOT ', 't t -' --- - , r O >_ / z , ao - - l MOM-,kaESS s - , - - - I I - I 1 > H — — - — -- — — — — — - I I o , "ENT o 1 ' CANDLE) OF I IG�iT U j Q I i `� �' -- - - - - ---- D" WDIE UTILITY t —�— I -00 O _ °-' --- - - - -- - - --------_-{1--- - --r------------- ---- — II �. i'I , o' �_ �ff�, j 1 , , NENT UTILITY EXIST. E :638 1 SIG TO B RE V i i o , 4 q t,C" 11 ' ' " H8 PROPERI�Y� LtNE 7YP 9.49 (358.15 ) -- ' 235'-0" FRONTAGE 1 t----------'-------------i-- t oo tQ _ ' ' a i WILL BE MEASUR�D', -- - ----- --}i - - --- - - - - -------�- +-, , 1 W r �! ' , AT THIS POINT `t '� `, ', ',� z I , ,I 36 -0 EL'636.0' NEAREST I ,' ' '` ``\ `\ 't ', O FIRE HYDRANT --�--� I--------•------------1 -- /2 F I 6 G , - I , , SET `\ EXISTING CURB Cut _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - 6 PROPOSED NEW "RIGHT TURN ' (CONCRETE APR N) ' \ - - - - - '-- __---NEw TREES AS - - - _ FROM PHASE I REQUIRED TYP. - _ _ _ - - _ _ ONLY'.' COMMON ACCESS I - ,� , +/- 330' _0" ' - _ - - (� - - - - -� - - i' CURB CUT CONCRETE) - - TOSBICENTENNIAL UPARK 20 0 WIDE TYPE-0 _ _ - i R�� - LANDSCAPED BUFFER- - - ------ YARD SHOWN SHADED ---- I --- •---- --- ------------ ...... ...... ..... - - �•�--_---- --- .... .... _....... ------------------- ------ - r- _�__ _` �..._ _ ... . - ------------------------------- ------ I ---- --- 3=3.;R:C �- \--- I ----- --------- - - - - -- -- --_- - EXIST. S.S. INLET- ' TO BE RELOCATED --� I - - - - _ T - ---_-- 195'-0" OWNER: - ✓ SU14INIARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS------------___- ---- 255 0 - - 1709 SOUTHLAKE OAKS• LTD. TO CENTEREINE OF SHADY OAKS DRIVE Buffcryard Canopy Accent SRrjr s Fence / Screening 38 -0 ■ -- Location . ` Length Width - Type Tress Trees Height & t,iaterialBy: Sandler Southwest Corp. ` Required 10' - F I 6' wood Sockadc, FM HIGHWAY 1709(S0UTHLA1T<C_,_E0 BLVD.) 1�soo Dallas Parkway Su><te 150 North R q " 5 -% t _P Finished Side to NnrLh- ( ASPHALT PAVEMENT W/ CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, 90'-0" WIDE ) , _ - Dallas, Texas 75248 ' ` - - " - - 972-250-0008 Fax; 972-250-1950 Provided• Z 3r� �o -P/ -7 14 2 8 AS �P'o - LITTL:=BERRY-G:-HAL-L--SURVEY ABS NO. 686 0 0 _ 3�, OS', 9 e O O O - ------ O O O O O O SUMMARY CHART - IN ERIORLANDSCAPE Provided" /a�' %,�'f_a S z9 ,(CIA HIR "-' CRANBERRY SURVEY, ABS N0. 581 South - Required Z 35-r 20'-0 /0 -5 none Required or Provided Landscape Area (Sq. ft.) 'o of area in front or side Cano y Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Cover (Sq. Ft) Prodded' all # Zp'�p� p /� -7 33 Required" 6-, 95v $"D?o O 20 /00 Sys licit Required 23S " 10' B 71 f /9 none Provided -7, Job & / ZV i /UO Provided* 142 /�j_D,r 4 J J% 111A — 'Note any credits used in calculations: a. 'Note any cttdits tried in calculations:� - G%�JrrrloT Y� a �4A9r I'��J� 1 j`Url" rr b a .. - " $,.cT�/ , „ 137 -D r 235 -Lr, 17 .• . r a r• ' ! rI rr Oth rnents I. A7 frSLv,,-c II �ED�A D{CAT RON3 1 \Vhere parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrobs obtain g a mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. 2.4�<<cR>=rP 3r1P�O y YX�E j }r 5f'ir"l�r �l-0�/� t�NE/jh/TE?s W'cY '%� Af /X lL�t $� • .? 41t�PBt S`a 4 �� of M�.t/• S/ Zt . VOL 7695 PG 1366 LAM CONNER ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL BENCHMARK: RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE AT NORTHEST CORNER OF F.M. 1709 AND SHADY OAKS ROAD ELEVATION 650.34 STATE OF TEXAS ROW Preliminary Site Development Plan SCALE: I" = 20'-0" a ro 15 20 30 40 eo SCALE IN FEET APPLICANT* - 1709 SOU -MAKE OAKS, LTD. F9r Information contact: Mr. Neal Cukerbaum it Sandler Southwest Corp. 16800 Dallas Parkway Suite 150 Dallas, Texas 75248 972-250-0008 Fax. 972-250-1950 VOL 10361 PG 1986 STATE OF TEXAS ROW DEDICATION 37'-011 I ©1997 James, Horwick-Partners, Inc. All Rights Reserved. All materials embodied herein constitute an original work by the Architect: the Architect owns all copyrights herein. The viewer may W not reproduce, display or distribute this work or prepare derivative ,w7 works based on this work without the express written consent of \A\�\ the copyright owner. V o � of ■ O o U O O C^ IZ ■ O -P 1(W IJ I I I j O VOL 11618 PG 1514 FM 1709- SHADY OAKS LTD 02 ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL SITE LOCATION MAP t tt ! r� elm ..-T. �tgo`w4 3 0 ' , y ICITY W4 ! �, P.A. $ I YI LLA6tt uH O I; J It + Writ C0111MOMTA01 M1Q CM(TrYRUMn1f. Oli — +COLL.E�f WIY.t.IE` Z - - VOL 6765 PG 805 RICHARD REUTILINGER ZONED C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL ■ TM Architects James, Harwiek+Partners, Inc. 8340 Meadow Road Suite 248 Dallas, Texas 75231 Telephone (214) 363-5687 Fax (214) 363-9563 Project Nmnber 97031 Dra" By DDT Date 04-28-97 Revision Number Date Resubmit Number 1 06-09-97 CASEN0..- ZA-97 0S8 Drawrag Number A101�� ■ ■ u i ticuiation Evaluation No.I No. ZA 97-058 Date of Evaluation: 6/05/97 Elevations for Southlake Oaks Ph. 11, Lot 2, Block I of 1709 Sot=thlake Oaks Received 4/28/97 Front - facing: South Wail ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Max. wall length 60 50 -17% Yes 60 19 -68% Min. artic. offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 3 000 Min. artic. length 13 16 23% Yes 5 13 160°/o Rear - facing ■ Max. wall length Min. artic. offset Min. antic. length Right - facing: Max. wall length Min. artic. offset Min. antic. length Left - facing: Max. wall length Min. artic. offset Min. artic. length ■ (V I I i I WEST ELEVATION VLr _ SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Yes Yes I I Yes EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-U" North Wall ht = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta OkayU 60 50 -17% Yes 60 50 -17% Yes 3 4 33% Yes. 3 3 0% Yes 13 13 0% Yes 13 13 0% Yes 9 East Wall ht. = 20 Iorizontal articulation Vertical articulation I Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? j 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23°.0 Yes 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes I 8 13 63% Yes 12 13 8% Yes j I West Wall lit. = 20 j Iorizontal articulation Vertical articulation j Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? 60 33 -45% Yes 60 46 -23% Yes 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes 8 13 63°0 Yes 12 13 8% Yes j T�, OP OF PARAPET ' ELL.-23—' -4" TOP OF STEEL --- ---- - - ---- .. _ --- EL.-21'-8" ' I TOP OF PARAPET _ Oil TOP OF STEEL .. i.--.---- EL.18'-4" ' I WINDOW HEAD EL.:16'-O' -.. _ . _ _ . - . . - -- ... .......... _... E L3 r TOP OF PARAPET EL.:15'-0" I TOP OF STEEL -, T EL. : 13' - 4" ,--�-,-- --� rr- �i r =i r -- r - ,gkTOP OF OPENING ,gkTOP OF COURSE Enlarged Elevation la - SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" R) N GRADE BM., PTD. I I I I I I ,---.{-----------------r--------- 03 SOUTH ELEVATION 6 5 TOWER BEYOND -- - - - BRICK SOLDIER CRS. OVERFLOW SCUPPER I TYP. a 5, 6" H.V. 12" W. ;DOOR AND FRAME !AS PER SCHEDULE I t — 13 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I /Ib" =1'-0" 10 I I I I I I EE I I 190'-01, ------ ----- I I PREFORMED, PREFIN. MTL ROOFING ! OVER 2 LAYERS BLDG FELT, OVER ROSIN SLIP SHEET OVER 5/e" TREATED PLYWOOD SHEATHING ------ 190' -01, 3 BRICK SOLDIER CRS. FACE BRICK ON BITUMINOUS DAMP - PROOFING ON 8" CMU I FACE BRICK TYP. -- ---- PLASTER FINISH OVER /Z" GYP. SHEATHING OVER 8" CMU TOP OF RIDGE LINE � EL.:35'-O" i CENTERLINE OF I STL PIPE COL RE: STRUCTURAL PREFORMED MTL FASCIA �TOP OF STL. EL.:28'-4" ! PBREAK REFIN MTL CLOSURE, I GLAZED ALUMINUM FRAME SYSTEM, PREFIN TOP OF STEEL i ._. EL.:23'-4" BRICK SOLDIER CRS. FACE BRICK WITH ANCHORS AT TOP OF PARAPET 16"..0,C.. E.W. EL.:20'-O" BRICK SOLDIER CRS. TOP OF STEEL GLAZED ALUMINUM EL.:18'-2" FRAME SYSTEM, PREFIN EL.=16'-O" WIN. HD. BREAK MTL CLOSURE, EL. 15'-0" T. 0. P. PREFIN TOP P OF STEEL EL.:13'-2" PRECAST CONC. LINTEL OPENING HEAD -- - --- FACE BRICK ON -- BITUMINOUS DAMP- EL.10'-0" PROOFING ON 8" CMU ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, PREFIN DOOR AND FRAME PER SCHED BRICK SOLDIER CRS. TOP OF COURSE EL.:3'-6" I ' ; I I ! , j I ©1997 James, Harwick+Partners, Inc. All Rights Reserved. All materials embodied herein constitute an original work by the Architect: the Architect owns all copyrights herein. The viewer may not reproduce, display or distribute this work or prepare derivative works based on this work without the express written consent of the copyright owner. o � a� c� r, QU O Cz O c� 0 C)*ftaIL:ci con ■ JH+ ID) Architects James, Harwick+Partners, Inc. 8340 Meadow Road Suite 248 Dallas, Texas 75231 Telephone (214) 363-5687 Fax (214) 363-9563 ■ Project Nmnber 9703 Dralm By DD Dote 04-28-9 Reksim Number Dd Resubmit Number 1 06-09-9 CASENO - ZA-97 D.S DrawingNx*r A401