Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2000-07-18 CC Packet
City of Southlake, Texas July 6, 2000 DRC Meeting RESUBMITTALS CASE DESCRIPTION ZA00-023 SITE PLAN Lot 4, Block 1, Kimball\1709 Addition Location: On the northeast corner of the intersection of North Kimball Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Applicant: Glenn Engineering Owner: Tricon NEW SUBMITTALS CASE DESCRIPTION ZA00-082 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (Outside storage) Lowe's Location: 201 N. Kimball Avenue, being on the northeast corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and North Kimball Avenue Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Applicant: Marc Mills Owner: Lowe's Companies, Inc. ZA00-083 SITE PLAN Rockenbaugh Elementary School Location: 301 Byron Nelson Parkway, being on the east side of Byron Nelson Parkway approximately 800'south of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development Applicant: Rockenbaugh Elementary Owner: C.I.S.D. ZA00-084 ZONING/CONCEPT PLAN Dove Road Estates Location: On the north side of Dove Road, approximately 150' east of North Carroll Avenue Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural Requested Zoning: "SF-20" Single-Family Residential District Applicant: Allegheny Land Co. Owner: Frank S. Shelby ZA00-085 PRELIMINARY PLAT Dove Road Estates Location: On the north side of Dove Road, approximately 150' east of North Carroll Avenue Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural Applicant: Allegheny Land Co. Owner: Frank S. Shelby • I City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 6, 2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. EXECUTIVE SESSION: If a need arises to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. 1. Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, the Commission may meet in executive session to consult with the City Attorney regarding matters authorized by Section 551.071, including matters posted on this agenda. 2. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on June 22, 2000. 3. Administrative Comments. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 4. Consent: ZA 00-076, FINAL PLAT OF GATEWAY PLAZA, PHASE II, on portions of Tracts 1, 2, 3, & 4, W. E. Mayfield's Subdivision, being approximately 22.4729 acres.Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 30, 2000. 5. Consent: ZA 00-077, FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MCADAMS ADDITION, located at 4001 T. W. King Road, being approximately 1.242 acres. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 30, 2000. City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 6,2000 • PAGE 2 REGULAR AGENDA: 6. Consider: ZA 00-053, REZONING of Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, being approximately 2.86 acres, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-lA" Single Family Residential District. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA 00-060, SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PROPOSED LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SABRE CAMPUS on portions of Tracts 2A2 and 2A7, U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, and being approximately 25.6 acres. The current zoning is "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2" Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies, training and conference centers, parking structures, heliport/stop and verti- port/stop, hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA 00-025, SITE PLAN FOR LOT 5R4-R2, PARKER'S CORNER, being approximately 1.099 acres. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA 00-052, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE AND A CAR WASH on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA 00-080, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Public Hearing. 11. Consider: ZA 00-081, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Public Hearing. City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 6,2000 PAGE 3 12. Consider: ZA 00-066, SITE PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, on Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, being approximately 0.458 acres. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA 00-069, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH on Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, being approximately 1.085 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: ZA 00-078, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A SHADE STRUCTURE for Mirage Car Wash located at 955 North Davis Boulevard, being approximately 2.00 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: Meeting Adjournment. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, QI.11 Jridayl , June 30, 2000, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the ill Texas Government Code, Chapter 55� ,UrHt, %, M ‘X Ati)>7: 75T 1 rri.L.: I 1---.I—3 t""' I X' = Sandra L. LeGrand =0: ;;c",; City Secretary * If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581,extension 704,and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 30, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: City Manager Notes • June Retreat Follow Up. I would like to get your feedback on this year's retreat as to your perception of its form, productivity and effectiveness. We will include in your packet binders a laminated copy of the City Council goals list D that all of us can refer to it from time to time (or as necessary). I am still in the process of compiling my thoughts and notes into written form, but overall I feel the format / agenda that we followed this year was much more productive. One question that did come up during the retreat was a desire to have a performance evaluation for our City Attorneys. The City Council directly hires the city manager, city secretary, city attorney, and soon will be appointing the city judge. You currently have a process and specific time for evaluating the city manager and city secretary. I will look into what various other cities are doing with respect to performance evaluations of Council-appointed employees and will provide that information to you as soon as it can be gathered. I do agree that all employees, whether appointed or otherwise, need some type of standard, regular evaluation (whether it be written or verbal depending on the position and or situation). The main objective, however, is to ensure that there is a clear understanding of expectations and desired direction from all parties concerned. • FM 1938 Support Resolution. Included with my memo is a draft resolution supporting a request for participation by TxDOT for improvement to the FM 1938 interchange at SH 114, and FM 1938 roadway improvements from SH 114 to FM 1709. This resolution will be passed by the Westlake and Keller city councils. As stated in my last memo to you, I believe this north—south Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes June 30, 2000 Page 2 of 4 roadway to be of vital importance to the City of Southiake. The resolution is only to show support for TxDOT's participation in the project and does not bind us to any fmancial obligation at this time. I have contacted Westlake Town Manager Trent Petty about the estimated engineering costs, but he does not yet have those costs available. Trent has contacted their engineering firm to get a quote for services, and he should hear something next week. You may have read recently that many in Trophy Club view this as a solution to their anticipated traffic problems as a result of Sabre closing a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard. I also believe it will help. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this resolution. • Monument sign for Oakwood Estates. Boyd Dollar has requested an entrance sign within the right-of-way for his subdivision. We have visited about this issue, and he will be talking with the homeowners to decide exactly what they want. At some point, they might want to appear before City Council with a request. • Change in City Logo. I did not hear anything back from you on your thoughts about changing the City logo. I am assuming that you agree that this is not what the City wants at this time. If I do not hear otherwise from the majority of you by next week, I will inform the Chamber that the City is silent on this issue at this time. • Priority Ranking by Department. You will find in your packet a revised set of charts for ranking projects by department. The charts were revised to include items that were suggested by Councilmembers after the prior distribution of PAF's and Council ranking. Note that there are again two sets, one with previous ranking scores and one set without scores. Please use these updated blank forms (dated 6-29-00) and rank your priorities in the left five columns and preferably return to my office by Friday, July 7. We appreciate your patience with this process Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes June 30, 2000 Page 3 of 4 • and hope that you find it as helpful as we do in determining overall City Council priorities. Contact Greg or me should you have any questions. • Call a Ride of Southlake, Inc. As you may recall, at the April 4, 2000 meeting Council approved an agreement with Call a Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) for the provision of transportation services for local seniors and the disabled. At the time, CARS was requesting $22,500 to help cover start up costs and operating expenses for a nine month period beginning January of 2000. Being a new organization with no formal history, Council determined that CARS would receive an initial $15,000 and Council would consider at a future meeting awarding an additional $7,500 following a review of their progress. Mr. Dick Johnston of CARS has been invited to attend the next meeting and provide you with a report on the development of their organization. Contact Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services should you have any questions. • Also attached to my memo: ❖ AMS ❖ Calendar of meetings / events ❖ July Calendar of Events from the Public Information Office ❖ Southlake Employee Newsletter "Inside Scoop" Staff Extension Numbers: Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes June 30, 2000 Page 4 of 4 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, ext. 767 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 re City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, REQUESTING PARTICIPATION BY THE STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO FM 1938 INTERCHANGE AT SH 114 AND FM 1938 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM SH 114 TO SH 1709; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE. WHEREAS, State Highway 114 and State Highway 1709 represent primary east-west means of access for all cities in northeast Tarrant and southern Denton County; and WHEREAS, State Highway 114 and State Highway 1709 do not have an adequate north- south connection to serve increasing commercial and residential development demands; and WHEREAS, the State of Texas Department of Transportation has long recognized the need for a north-south connector for SH 114 and SH 1709 by designating FM 1938, know locally as Precinct Line Road in Keller, a section of Randol Mill Road in Southlake and Precinct Ling Road in Westlake as the preferred north-south connector route; and WHEREAS, the commencement of construction on the Fidelity Investments Regional headquarters in Westlake, initially employing 1,800 people and ultimately employing at least 2,500 people , and the commencement of construction of Sabre, Inc. Headquarters in Southlake, initially employing 2,000 people and ultimately employing as many as 10,000 people, require immediate additional north-south access to prevent dangerous traffic loads on existing north-south residential streets in Westlake, Southlake, and Keller; and WHEREAS, private support from Fidelity Investments, Sabre, Inc., Hillwood Development Corporation, Maguire Partners and many others have committed support for the completion of FM 1938 Interchange and FM 1938 roadway by performing design work, dedicating right-of-way or committing funds to support the project; and WHEREAS, public support for the project has already been received in the form of dedicated right-of-way necessary to construct the project and the necessary adjacent right-of-way dedication for the NETCRWS water line to provide necessary water supply to Southlake, Keller, and Westlake; now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: ! Resolution No. Page 2 Section 1. That all matters stated in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety. Section 3. That the City of Southlake fully supports the installation of unimpeded "Texas U-turns" to facilitate east and westbound traffic at the FM 1938/SH 114 interchange. Section 4. That the City of Southlake formally requests the timely dedication of discretionary funds by the Texas Department of Transportation to complete the design, engineering and construction of FM 1938 Interchange and FM 1938 roadway from SH 114 to SH 1709. Section 5. That if any provision of this Resolution shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, then the remainder of such Resolution shall remain in full force and effect as if separately enacted. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 -RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/scores) High—Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score 5 PW Storm Water Utility District 80% Yes 1 1 3 3 PW Drainage Ordinance Revisions 80% Yes 3 1.5 Comment:Intend to begin after elections. 4 1 1 PW Drainage Master Plan 0% Yes 7 1.83 3 2 1 1 PW Underground utilities 70% Yes 8 2 3 2 1 1 PW Utility Placement Ordinance 70% Yes 8 2 1 2 1 PW Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 70% Yes 8 2 1 2 2 1 PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord.217) 75% Yes 23 2.67 1 1 2 PW Septic Ordinance 25% Yes 32 3.25 1 1 4 PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(704-B)Open House Signs 0% Yes 34 3.33 4 1 PW Flood Plain Ordinance 0% Yes 42 3.4 1 1 2 1 PW Health and Sanitation Ordinance 0% Yes 50 3.6 1 1 1 2 PW Street Light Standards 0% Yes 54 3.8 6 1 PL City-Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update 70% Yes 2 1.43 Comment:Staff preparation complete,pending workgroup HOLD direction 3 2 PL Conversion to a Unified Development Ordinance 0% Yes 5 1.8 4 1 1 PL Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses(on hold) 50% Yes 8 2 Comment:ZBA orientation/procedures completed by staff awaiting city attorney's review and council direction. 2 1 - 1 PL Ord.480-LL,revising outside storage/screening regulations 0% Yes 8 2 2 3 PL Thoroughfare Plan Amendment:Peytonville/Shady Oaks 25% Yes 15 2.2 connection HOLD Comment: On hold at Council(work group to be formed of area residents) 2 2 1 PL Zoning Ordinance 480-V-Misc.Clean-up Items Phase I 80% Yes 15 2.2 1 3 1 1 PL Hotel/Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance 25% Yes 17 2.33 Comment:Staff completed first draft, waiting on establishing a workgroup. 2 1 1 1 PL Growth management study 85% 25 2.8 Comment:Final report pending in workgroup 2 1 2 1 PL Zoning Ordinance-SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial 5% Yes 26 2.83 Districts Comment:Idea has not been supported by PZ or CC in past. 1 1 2 1 1 PL Ord.480-KK,revising noise standards 80% Yes 28 3 Comment:Staff preparation and City Attorney review complete, waiting on discussion at CC on 7-18-00, consideration by PZ on 7-20-00 2 1 2 1 PL Zoning Ord:Reduce Residential PUD Min.Acreage 50% Yes 34 3.33 (land conservation revision) HOLD Comment: On hold per request of workgroup. Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:48 AM Page 1 of 4 • Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 - RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/scores) High—Low Results I 1 2 3 7 I 4 5 % PAF Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score 1 2 2 1 PL Zoning Ordinance-Special Events Permit&Procedures 80% Yes 34 3.33 Comment:Staff has completed first draft 1 3 1 1 PL/CS Ord.483-I Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing 0% Yes 34 3.33 park dedication requirements 2 3 PL Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Regulations 0% Yes 42 3.4 2 1 2 PL Elimination of perimeter walls and fences around residential 0% Yes 50 3.6 subdivisions in low density areas along arterial roadways. 1 2 1 2 PL Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard Issues(Workgroup) 10% Yes 53 3.67 2 2 1 PL Zoning Ordinance Revisions:Lighting Standards 0% Yes 54 3.8 PL City Art Fund/Commission/Business District 0% Yes N/A N/A PL/PW Driveway Ordinance Revisions .. .. 0% Yes N/A N/A PL Gas Station Regulations Revisit 0% Yes N/A N/A 4 2 1 PS/PL Emergency Preparedness Notification Program 80% Yes 4 1.57 4 1 2 PS False Alarm Reduction Program 90% Yes 13 2.14 2 2 1 1 PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484 90% Yes 19 2.5 2 1 2 PS 1997 Uniform Fire Code 90% Yes 21 2.6 1 1 2 2 PS/PL Revise Landscape Ordinance to include bufferyards etc. 0% Yes 26 2.83 3 1 1 1 PS Sign Ordinance Revisions 0% Yes 28 3 1 2 3 PS Ordinance Establishing Regulations on Corps' Property 0% Yes 31 3.17 4 2 PS Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 5% Yes 34 3.33 1 2 3 PS Substandard Bldg.Ordinance 0% Yes 34 3.33 1 3 1 1 PS High Grass/Weeds Ordinance revision 0% Yes 34 3.33 2 1 1 2 PS Residential lighting standards review 0% Yes 47 3.5 2 1 2 PS Mass Gathering Ordinance 0% Yes 56 4 1 1 4 PS Elevator Ordinance 0% Yes 57 4.5 PS/PL Tree and Landscape Ordinances 0% Yes N/A N/A 3 1 2 CS Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 10% Yes 14 2.17 Comment:In conjunction with TSMP update. 1 1 4 CS Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan: 40% Yes 19 2.5 2 1 1 3 CS Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan 75% Yes 24 2.71 Comment::In conjunction with Parks Master Plan update and Bob Jones Development 1 4 1 1 CS Youth Master Plan Development 0% Yes 33 3.29 1 3 2 1 CS Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project: 0% Yes 44 3.43 1 1 1 2 2 CS/PL Trail System Master Plan Update 20% Yes 44 3.43 1 2 1 3 CS Ord. 774,Amending Trail system Master Plan to require all 60% No 44 3.43 trails to be 8 feet in width 1 1 3 CM Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 50% Yes 18 2.4 HOLD Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:48 AM Page 2 of 4 Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 -RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/scores) High—Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score 1 1 2 1 CM Citywide Strategic Plan 50% Yes 21 2.6 2 2 1 CM Trash pick-up contract review 0% Yes 28 3 2 2 2 CM City of Southlake Annual Report 0% Yes 34 3.33 1 1 2 2 CM Resident Satisfaction Survey 0% Yes 47 3.5 1 2 3 1 CM Southlake Historical Commission 50% Yes 49 3.57 2 1 2 CM Rules of the City Council 0% Yes 50 3.6 1 4 ED Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy 20% Yes 5 1.8 Comment:Significant research collected.Priority has been the Kirkwood Road Closure issue. The following projects were submitted after Council ranking. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\Reports\2000-06-23 c.doc Department Legend: PW=Public Works, PL=Planning,CS=Community Services,CM=City Manager, SEC=City Secretary,FI=Finance,PS=Public Safety,HR=Human Resources,ED=Economic Development Note: If you would like to request a Project Advocacy Form(PAF),please contact Greg at 481-5581, x750 or E-mail: glast@ci.southlake.tx.us Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:48 AM Page 3 of 4 I Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 - RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/o scores) High Low Results % PAF 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PW Storm Water Utility District 80% Yes PW Drainage Ordinance Revisions 80% Yes Comment:Intend to begin after elections. PW Drainage Master Plan 0% Yes PW Underground utilities 70% Yes PW Utility Placement Ordinance 70% Yes PW Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 70% Yes PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord. 217) 75% Yes PW Septic Ordinance 25% Yes PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(704-B)Open House Signs 0% Yes PW Flood Plain Ordinance 0% Yes PW Health and Sanitation Ordinance 0% Yes PW Street Light Standards 0% Yes PL City-Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update 70% Yes Comment:Staff preparation complete,pending workgroup HOLD direction PL Conversion to a Unified Development Ordinance 0% Yes PL Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses(on hold) 50% Yes Comment:ZBA orientation/procedures completed by staff awaiting city attorney's review and council direction. PL Ord. 480-LL,revising outside storage/screening regulations 0% Yes PL Thoroughfare Plan Amendment: Peytonville/Shady Oaks 25% Yes connection HOLD Comment: On hold at Council(work group to be formed of area residents) PL Zoning Ordinance 480-V-Misc. Clean-up Items Phase 1 80% Yes PL Hotel/Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance 25% Yes Comment:Staff completed first draft, waiting on establishing a workgroup. PL Growth management study 85% Comment:Final report pending in workgroup PL Zoning Ordinance- SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial 5% Yes Districts Comment:Idea has not been supported by PZ or CC in past. PL Ord.480-KK,revising noise standards 80% Yes Comment:Staff preparation and City Attorney review complete, waiting on discussion at CC on 7-18-00, consideration by PZ on 7-20-00 PL Zoning Ord:Reduce Residential PUD Min.Acreage 50% Yes (land conservation revision) HOLD Comment: On hold per request of workgroup. Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:52 AM Page 1 of 4 I Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 - RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/o scores) High-----Low Results % PAF 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PL Zoning Ordinance- Special Events Permit&Procedures 80% Yes Comment:Staff has completed first draft PL/CS Ord.483-I Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing 0% Yes park dedication requirements PL Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Regulations 0% Yes PL Elimination of perimeter walls and fences around residential 0% Yes subdivisions in low density areas along arterial roadways. PL Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard Issues(Workgroup) 10% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Lighting Standards 0% Yes PL City Art Fund/Commission/Business District 0% Yes PL/PW flriveway Ordinance Revisions 0% Yes PL Gas Station Regulations Revisit 0% Yes PS/PL Emergency Preparedness Notification Program 80% Yes PS False Alarm Reduction Program 90% Yes PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484 90% Yes PS 1997 Uniform Fire Code 90% Yes PS/PL Revise Landscape Ordinance to include bufferyards etc. 0% Yes PS Sign Ordinance Revisions 0% Yes PS Ordinance Establishing Regulations on Corps' Property 0% Yes PS Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 5% Yes PS Substandard Bldg. Ordinance 0% Yes PS High Grass/Weeds Ordinance revision 0% Yes PS Residential lighting standards review 0% Yes PS Mass Gathering Ordinance 0% Yes PS Elevator Ordinance 0% Yes PS/PL Tree and Landscape Ordinances 0% Yes CS Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 10% Yes Comment:In conjunction with TSMP update. CS Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan: 40% Yes CS Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan 75% Yes Comment:In conjunction with Parks Master Plan update and Bob Jones Development CS Youth Master Plan Development 0% r Yes CS Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project: 0% Yes CS/PL Trail System Master Plan Update 20% Yes CS Ord. 774,Amending Trail system Master Plan to require all 60% No trails to be 8 feet in width CM Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 50% Yes HOLD Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:52 AM Page 2 of4 Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 3 -RESULTS OF RANKING (By Dept. w/o scores) High---Low Results % PAF 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score CM Citywide Strategic Plan 50% Yes CM Trash pick-up contract review 0% Yes CM City of Southlake Annual Report 0% Yes CM Resident Satisfaction Survey 0% Yes CM Southlake Historical Commission 50% Yes CM Rules of the City Council 0% Yes ED Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy 20% Yes Comment:Significant research collected.Priority has been the Kirkwood Road Closure issue. The following projects were submitted after Council ranking. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\Reports\2000-06-23d.doc Department Legend: PW=Public Works, PL=Planning,CS=Community Services,CM=City Manager, SEC=City Secretary,FI=Finance,PS=Public Safety,HR=Human Resources,ED=Economic Development Note: If you would like to request a Project Advocacy Form(PAF),please contact Greg at 481-5581,x750 or E-mail: glast@ci.southlake.tx.us Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 29,2000 11:52 AM Page 3 of 4 AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/30/00 3:38 PM c e". Council Meeting—July 18, 2000 Council Meeting—August 1, 2000 Reports/Forum: Reports/Forum: Consent: Consent: Minutes of June 20 1. Minutes Amending the Personnel Policy Manual to inc Worker's Comp Wage- 2. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a prof servs agr w/JD Wilson and Assoc LS for development of a strategic plan-SKY 3. Res. ,Requesting participation by TxDOT for improvements to FM 3. Approval of a prof sery agr for the engineering and design of sanitary 1938 interchanges at SH 114&FM 1938 improvements from SH 114 to sewer improv to serve the Oak Hill Addn as part of a CDBG-SP SH 1709-BC 4. Approval of a prof sery agr w/Wiss,Janney,Elstner Assoc.Inc for 4. Award bid for Town Hall hand rails-RH engineering and design of street rehabilitation in Timberlake and 5. Res.#_,adopting amendments to the Tax Abatement Agr w/Sabre-GL Southview-SP 2"Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2'Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1. ZA 00-016,Z,for property So.of Walgreens"C-2"to"0-1" 1. ZA 99-139,RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 2. ZA 00-037,RZ,Tracts 4G1&4H,Johnson Rd 2. **ZA 00-053,Z,Tr 3H,T.M.Hood,Glover 3. ZA 00-040,ZSP,Georgetown Park 4. ZA 00-041,SUP for carport-Georgetown Park 5. ZA 00-047,RZ, SP,L-3,B-i Corner Atkin 6. ZA 00-048 RZ,SP,L-2R,B-1,Corner Addn **Pending P&Z Action 7. ZA 00-064,RZ, SP,Bicentennial Park 8. ZA 00-060,SP,portion of L-4,B-1 Sabre Group 9. Ord.No.786 revising the City Code,Parks and Rec Bd number of board members and length of term 10. Ord.No.787,Abandonment of permanent utility easement SH114-SP 11. Ord.756-A,Rev to FY99-00 Budget 12. **ZA 00-052,SUP Lot 1,Emery,Texaco,gasoline service station 13. **ZA 00-080,SUP Texaco,packaged beer sales **ZA 00-081,SUP Texaco,outside storage **ZA 00-069, SUP Lighthouse Community Church,church service iv. **ZA 00-078,SUP Mirage Car Wash,sun shade 17. **ZA 00-066,SP,Southlake Chamber of Commerce 18. **ZA 00-025,SP,Lot 5R4-R2,Parker's Corner **Pending P&Z Action 1" Reading&Related Items: 1" Reading&Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139,RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 1. Ord.#778, Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord. No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. **ZA 00-053,Z,Tr 3H,T.M.Hood,Glover 2. **ZA 00-024,RZ,2929 N.White Ch.,SF-1A,24.414 ac(P&Z tabled 3. ZA 00-54, PS,Lot 17,T.M Hood No.706 Addn.,variance to to July 20) Subdivision Ord. 3. **ZA 00-036,PP Simmons Addn 4. Ord.#783, Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord.Relating to **Pending P&Z Action Municipal Court of Record-SL **Pending P&Z Action Resolutions: Resolutions: 1. Consider: Consider: 1. Bob Jones Park conceptual plan-KH 1. Registration/fee policy for Parks&Rec programs-KH 2. CARS agreement-KH 2. Commercial developers agr for CISD No.6 Addition-CT 3. Sign Variance request-Lowes-MJ 3. Award of Bid to for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements along N.Carroll(bid opening 7/13)-SP 4. Award of bid to_for the abandonment of the lift station at Dove Creek (bid opening 7/13)-SP 5. Commercial developer's agr for Southlake Blvd.,Presbyterian Ch-CT 6. Commercial developer's agr for Gateway Plaza Phase 2,Unit 1-CT 7. Residential developer's agr for Crown Ridge Addn Phase IA&IB-CT cuss: Discuss: Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord.No.480-KK Noise Regs- KPG(PZ tabled to June 8,CC disc item when?) Executive Session: Executive Session: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/30/00 3:38 PM City Council Meeting—August 15, 2000 City Council Meeting— September 5, 2000 Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: Minutes 1. Authorize IA w/CISD for natatorium-KH 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord.No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. **ZA 00-024,RZ,2929 N. White Ch.,SF-1A,24.414 ac(P&Z tabled to July 20 3. Ord.#783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord.Relating to Municipal Court of Record-SL **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action 1st Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action Resolutions: Resolutions: Consider: Consider: Discuss: Discussion: ecutive Session: r /1 AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/30/00 3:38 PM Future City Council Meeting Forum: sent: 1. Fort Worth Water Contract-RH 2. Award bid on handrails Town Hall-RH 3. Auth Mayor to execute letter authorizing TxDOT to change speed limits in construction zone on SH 114-SP 4. Award of Bid to for the purchase of furniture for Town Hall"to the AMS under consider items for September 5,2000? 5. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Fina(S-7)-SP 6. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Explorer(S-7)-SP 7. Permission to advertise for bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Davis Blvd.and Continental-SP 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: • 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#760,ROW Use Management Ordinance-RH/SKY 2. Ord.483-I,Amendments to Sub Ord No.483,-Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements-CC/KH 3. Ord.No.774,Amendment to Trail System Master Plan-CC/KH Resolutions: 1. Res.99-16,relating to limiting#of zoning applications-from 3/23 CC mtg Consider: 1. Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 2. Prof Services Agreement-Michael Drive(PW-5/4/99) 3. Interlocal Agreement with Grapevine re:North Kimball-RH 4. Auth Mayor to enter into an IA w/NE Tarrant County Regional Water System(NETCRWS)-RH Discuss: 1. Land Conservatory District . 2. Utility Policies&Standards Ordinance 3. Street Standard Ordinance 4. 5/16/2000-Ord. 759,False alarm Ordinance-GW/DuPre 5. Ord.#_,Sign Ordinance-MJ 6. Ord.762,Adoption of Uniform Fire Code-RB 7. Ord.770,High Grass/Weeds-MJ 8. Ord.771,Nuisance Ordinance-MJ 9. Ord._,Abatement of Hazardous Buildings-MJ 10. **Amendment to Master Thoroughfare Plan-CC 11. ecutive Session: • July 3 _ July 2000 August 2000 5—__M__t__1N_ L__�_ .s __ S tom__T_ ,N 26 1 34 1 2 3 4 5 27 12 `3 4 5 6 7 8 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 J�' 28 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 33 13 14 15 36 17 18 19 29 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 35 , 31 30 31 Monday,July 3 Thursda ,Jul 6 Kevin Hugman out of office Kevin Hugman out of office 7:30pm 8:30pm Children's Stars&Stripes Parade(Town Square) 6:30pm P&Z Meeting (City Hall) 9:30pm 10:00pm Fireworks Display @ Town Square Tuesda ,Jul 4' Frida ,Jul 7 Kevin Hugman out of office Kevin Hugman out of office HOLIDAY-Ci offices closed Wednesday,July 5' Saturday,July 8 Kevin Hugman out of office Kevin Hugman out of office Sunday,Jul 9 Kevin Hugman out of office Meetings Even`- 6/30/00 �'y o as July 2000 August 2000 JS M L_AI� F S 1 5 M T_IN L_� S __ 1 3 5 27 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3' I 32 6 7 9 10 114 12 J u'y 16 28 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 33 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Z3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 35 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 31 r 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 35 �27 28 29 30 31 Monday,July 10, Thursday,July 13 6:00pm 6:30pm Joint SPDC and Parks and Recreation(City Hall) 6:00pm 7:00pm JUC meeting (CISD Admin Building) 7:00pm Park Board(City Hall) 7:00pm 8:00pm SPIN Standing Committee Meeting(Sr.Activity Center) Tuesday,July 11 Friday,July 14 1:15pm Sr.Advisory Committee(Sr.Activity Center) Wednesday,July12 - Saturday,July 15 7:00pm 7:30pm Crime Control Meeting(City Hall) I Sunday,July 16 Meetings E) 6/30/00 City of Southlake Public Information Office � ' Contact: L. James Kunke • 0/Ike (817) 481-5581, Ext. 819 July Calendar of Events Wednesday,June 28 Mayor. 2—Masterworks Music Series,7p.m.,FamilyPark Pavilion,Southlake Town Square.Vocalist Dee Rick Stacy July Dee Gibson will perform this free concert sponsored by City of Southlake and Arts Council of NorthEast Mayor Pro Tern: Tarrant County.Phone:(817)283-3406. Gary Fawks Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: July 3—Stars and Stripes Celebration,7 p.m., Southlake Town Square.The official Southlake celebra- Ronnie Kendall tion of Independence Day,sponsored by the City of Southlake and Southlake Town Square,will include a children's parade,prizes for patriotic outfits,Lake Cities Communit yBand at 8:30 p.m.and fireworks Councilmembers: at dusk.Phone:(817),.81-5581,ext.756,or(817)329-5566. Keith Shankland Rex Potter Greg Standerfer July 4—Independence Day holiday.City offices will be closed(public safety and other essential servic- Patsy DuPre es will remain open). Regularly schedule City Council meeting will not be held. There will be no resi- City Manager: dential curbside garbage or recycling collection. Billy Campbell July 6—Movies in the Park,8 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will fea- Assistant City Manager: ture The Iron Giant,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext. 756. "^a K.Yelverton >ecretary: July 6 — DARE Day Camp, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., Camp Burnett. This event continues through July 9. Sandra L.LeGrand Registration is limited to the first 20 CISD fifth-and sixth-graders to enroll.Phone:(817)481-2250. July 6— Seniors "Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes a scrapbook seminar at 11 am.The weekly watercolor art class will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 7—Lake Cities Community Band concert,7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.This is a free public per- formance by the Southlake-based Lake Cities band.Phone:(817)329-5566. July 8—Star Party on the Hill,8:45-11 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.North Texas Skywatch presents this free family evening of telescopes,celestial sightseeing and an interactive slide show.Slide show will move into the Community Center in the event of rain.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. July 11 — Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Games, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 13—Movies in the Park, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will feature Tarzan,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext. 756. July 13—Seniors"Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m.,Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 am. and includes free hearing screnings starting at 11 a.m. The weekly watercolor art class will follow at 1 p.m. Phone: (817)481-2776. July 15—Concert on the Hill, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park.The Rankins will present this free public per- formance,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. (CONT.ON NEXT PAGE) 1725 East Southlake Blvd. * Southlake, Texas 76092 r t . . City of Southlake _....„A Public Information Office DUt iak- Contact: L. James Kunke (817) 481-5581, Ext. 819 i I July Calendar of Events - Cont. Wednesday,June 28 Mayor. Rick Stacy July 18—DARE Polar Ice Night,6:30-9 p.m.,Polar Ice skating rink.Cost is$7 per person and includes Mayor Pro Tern: skate rental.Phone:(817)481-2250. Gary Fawks Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: July 18—Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Sing-A-Long, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m.,Senior Activity Center,307 Ronnie Kendall Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. Councilmembers: July 20—Movies in the Park,8 p n.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will Keith Shankland Rex Potter feature Stuart Little,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. Greg Standerfer Patsy DuPre July 20— Seniors"Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood City Manager. Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes the Billy Campbell monthly book discussion at noon.Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. Assistant City Manager. July 22—DV8 concert,7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.This is a free public performance.Phone:(817) Shana K.Yelverton 329-5566. Secretary: Qandra L LeGrand July 24 — Southlake Chamber of Commerce luncheon, 11:30 a.m., Marriott Solana. Speaker will be Southlake Director of Economic Development Greg Last.Phone:(817)481-8200. July 25 — Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Crafts, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 25— DARE Skatetown Night, 6:30-8:30 p.m., Skatetown skating rink. Cost is $4 per person and includes skate rental.Phone:(817)481-2250. I July 27—Movies in the Park, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will feature Charlotte's Web,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. July 27—Seniors"Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes an Alaska travel video showing and ice cream sundaes at 12:30 p.m.Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 28—Friday Fun Night,6 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood Drive. Seniors are invited to this evening of table games,a movie and refreshments.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 29—Sizzlin Summer Skate Nite,7:30-9:30 p.m.,Bicentennial Park in-line hockey rink.Families are invited to enjoy this free evening of skating and music.Younger skaters will be required to wear helmets. Concessions will be sold.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.758. July 29—Pontiac Car Club show,3-7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.Phone:(817)329-5566. July 29—Lost Cause concert,7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.This is a free public performance of rock music. Phone:(817)329-5566. 1725 East Southlake Blvd. * Southlake, Texas 76092 (8171 4$ 1-cR;11 * fay /R171 19A-1747 City of Southlake, Texas t MEMORANDUM June 30, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Zoning Commission Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development(ext. 750) Stefanie Wagoner, Economic Development Specialist(ext. 776) SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Economic Development Topics Following are some topics or projects that may be of interest to you. Feel free to contact either of us should you have any questions, comments or suggestions. Sabre News Releases We have attached five(5)recent news releases from Sabre. The June 7 releases focus on a newly signed contract for consulting and information technology services and organizational changes. The June 13 release announces an alliance to create an aerospace marketplace; and the June 26 release discloses a 51% stake acquisition in German-based Dillon Communication Systems. American Hometown Leadership Award The Chamber of Commerce recently submitted an application for the American Hometown Leadership Award to honor Mayor Rick Stacy's efforts with the development of Southlake Town Square. This award is sponsored by Wal-Mart and the National Center for Small Communities. Nominees must be elected officials who "make a difference" in their community, and should have had responsibility for an activity that resulted in a particular accomplishment that benefited the general public. The tmvernment must serve a community with a population of 25,000 or fewer. All winners will be notified by mail in late July/early August. The rules & regulations, as well as the application, are attached. Project Profile Attached is a revised Project Profile on Gateway Plaza. The Grand Opening for the center is still on schedule for July. City of Southlake-Fast Facts Brochure The 2000 Fast Facts brochure has returned from press! Additions to the previous version include Top Non-Residential Tax Payers, Top Employers, and Recent Major Developments. We are including one for your information; should you require additional copies, please do not hesitate to contact us. N:\EcondevTorresp\City\CM\00-06-30.doc City of Southlake, Texas Enc: Sabre news releases: "Bahamasair Signs Multimillion Dollar Consulting and Information Technology Contract with Sabre" "Sabre Announces Key Changes in Organizational Structure to Better Serve Customer Needs" "Sabre Announces Management Changes" "Sabre and Skyfish Align To Create Aerospace Marketplace" American Hometown Leadership Award Nomination Updated Gateway Plaza Project Profile City of Southlake Fast Facts 2000 Brochure cc: City Attorney Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Department Directors Planning Staff N:\Econdev\CorresKity\CM100-06-30.doc News Release Kevin J. Arlington Vollmer (972)488-4790 KevinA@vollmerpr.com Taylor L. Cole Sabre (817)963-6537 taylor.cole@sabre.com Sabre Bahamasair Signs Multimillion Dollar Consulting and Information Technology Contract With Sabre Airline taps Sabre expertise for strategic direction and technology solutions FORT WORTH, TX— June 7, 2000 -- Sabre Holdings Corporation (NYSE: TSG) announced today that the company has entered into a 10-year agreement with Bahamasair for strategic consulting and information technology services. The agreement is valued at $15.4 million. By using Sabre's proven technologies, Bahamasair will augment its passenger reservation and service systems, inventory and maintenance controls, desktop management processes and customer service initiatives. "Our relationship with Sabre offers Bahamasair the strategic and operational expertise needed to increase our profitability to become a leading regional carrier," said Frederik Gottlieb, chairman of Bahamasair. "We're creating superior customer service programs to enhance our passenger experience from reservations to baggage claim." Sabre has been working with Bahamasair's executive management team on their strategic and technical efforts since February of this year. Sabre will continue consulting Bahamasair in the areas of finances, operations and marketing. "This agreement with Bahamasair confirms our commitment to providing airlines with services and solutions to grow their business," said Joe Saliba, senior vice president of Sabre. "With our proven airline expertise and vast product portfolio, we are able to deliver a wide array of solutions to address strategic and operational issues to help airlines meet their unique business requirements." Bahamasair will begin using the SabreO Passenger Reservation System, Sabre®ACS with the Sabre®Qik interface, Reward, Qik-Res and Sabre 0 Maxi-Merlin. • The Passenger Reservation System is the most utilized airline reservations system in the world and will provide Bahamasair a technological advantage in the areas of seat inventory control, electronic ticketing, code-sharing, connectivity to global distribution system, Internet access and e-commerce. -more- Bahamasair Signs Multimillion Dollar Contract With Sabre June 7,2000 Page 2 • The ACS passenger check-in system with the Qik interface and Qik-Res allows reservation agents to quickly and efficiently service passengers by presenting passenger information in a consistent, uncomplicated format with logical entry sequences and graphical representations. Qik-Res system simplifies the Bahamasair reservation process, allowing agents to focus more on the customer. • The Reward loyalty management system enables Bahamasair to create and maintain customer loyalty by offering recognition awards and incentives. Reward tracks frequent flyer accounts, manages bonuses and promotions, and performs marketing analysis on passenger preferences. • The Maxi-Merlin maintenance, engineering, and inventory system is an online, real- time, fully integrated enterprise-wide solution which offers airlines a tool to achieve optimal utilization of aircraft resources, improved performance, and decreased cost. Bahamasair chose these Sabre products to improve customer satisfaction, to enable competitive market decisions, to increase operational efficiency, to improve integration among its key reservations, maintenance and marketing systems and revenue generation. About Bahamasair Bahamasair, the national carrier of The Bahamas, is wholly owned by the Bahamian government and has been in operation for 27 years. The Bahamasair fleet presently consists of 8 short-haul aircraft, which board over 1.5 million passengers a year. The airline serves the regional Bahamian Islands, as well as several U.S. cities and The Turks and Caicos. About Sabre Sabre is the global leader in applying information technology to meet the needs of the travel and transportation industries with advanced and innovative technology skills to deliver progressive solutions. Headquartered in Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, the company has more than 10,000 employees worldwide who span 45 countries. Sabre reported 1999 revenues of$2.4 billion, up 5.6 percent from 1998. Net earnings excluding special items were $264 million, up 15.2 percent from the prior year. More information on Sabre is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.sabre.com. Sabre and the Sabre logo are registered trademarks of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. #Its News Release Contact: Theda W.Page Whitehead Sabre (817)967-1859 theda.whitehead@sabre.com Sabre Editors note:Reporters interested in participating in a 10:00 a.m. CST conference call should call Sabre Corporate Communications at 817-967-0001 for registration/access information. Sabre Announces Key Changes in Organizational Structure to Better Serve Customer Needs FORT WORTH,TX —June 7, 2000—Sabre Holdings Corporation (NYSE: TSG) announced today key changes effective immediately in its organizational structure with the creation of three strategic business units reporting to chairman and chief executive officer,William J. Hannigan. The three business units are: travel marketing and distribution; outsourcing and software solutions; and emerging businesses. "These changes represent the next step in the evolution of Sabre,"said Hannigan. "It is imperative that we have the ability to respond faster to our customers and our markets. The business units will focus on the care of their respective customers. This structure will better equip us to deliver long term revenue and earnings growth." The company said that the new organization will provide a framework for improved efficiency, cultivation of new businesses and the reduction of costs for the purposes of reinvestment. These objectives will be met through the following: • Travel Marketing and Distribution Group: This organization will fully leverage new Internet technologies and the power of the world's largest global distribution system for travel agencies, corporate travel departments and the end traveler. Eric J. Speck has been named group president of this business,which includes three business units--Travel Agency Solutions, Sabre Business Travel Solutions and Sabre VirtuallyThere. • Outsourcing and Software Solutions Unit: This organization will leverage the company's full portfolio of software solutions targeting customers in the global travel and transportation industries. Bradford J. Boston has been named president of this business unit,which includes information technology outsourcing, software solutions including decision support systems, consulting and ASP services. • Emerging Businesses Unit: This organization will focus on the identification, investment and incubation of high potential emerging businesses within and outside of the travel and transportation industries. This organization will explore partnerships and alliances, such as the recently announced Sabre®marketplace,the Internet-enabled business-to-business exchange designed primarily for the travel and transportation industries, and Web hosting where the company's core competencies can be leveraged. Thomas Klein has been named president of this group,reporting to Sam Gilliland,who has been named chief marketing officer of Sabre Inc. In addition to the three strategic business units,the company also announced the following appointments: Sam Gilliland has been named chief marketing officer reporting to the chairman and chief executive officer,responsible for strategic marketing,business development and emerging businesses. R. Craig Murphy has been named chief technology officer reporting to the chairman and chief executive officer,responsible for the technology direction and strategic architecture for the company. This office includes Sabre's research organization and Sabre Labs. The following individuals will continue in their current roles reporting to the chairman and chief executive officer: Michael E. Haefner, senior vice president of human resources; Jeffery M. Jackson, executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer; Carol A. Kelly, senior vice president and chief information officer; Joan C. Kuehl, senior vice president and chief of staff; Michael W.Nelson, senior vice president and general manager of global infrastructure; David A. Schwarte, executive vice president and general counsel; and Geoff Sloma, auditor. "We are fortunate to have the skills and talents of these individuals to lead us,"said Hannigan. "The depth and breadth of their combined experience and our deep bench strength has us well positioned to execute our strategies and deliver value for our shareholders." Sabre is the global leader in applying information technology to meet the needs of the travel and transportation industries with advanced and innovative technology skills to deliver progressive solutions. Headquartered in Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas,the company has more than 10,000 employees worldwide who span 45 countries. Sabre reported 1999 revenues of$2.4 billion,up 5.6 percent from 1998. Net earnings were$264 million,excluding special items,up 15.2 percent from the prior year. More information on Sabre is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.sabre.com. Sabre and the Sabre logo are registered trademarks of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. Statements in this news release that are not purely historical facts,including statements about anticipated or expected future revenue and earnings growth,are forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended. All forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to Sabre on the date of this release. Any forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the events or results described in the forward looking statements,including risks related to: Sabre's relationships with American and US Airways and their affiliates;competition and technological innovation by competitors;risks related to Sabre's technology; seasonality of the travel industry and booking revenues; sensitivity to general economic conditions and events that affect airline travel;risks associated with Sabre's international operations;and legal and regulatory issues. Further information regarding factors that could affect Sabre's financial and other results is included in Sabre's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Sabre undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information,future events or otherwise. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. News Release Contacts: Theda W.Page Whitehead Sabre (817)967-1859 theda.whitehead@sabre.com Taylor L.Cole Sabre (817)963-6537 taylor.cole@sabre.com Moroi. Sabre Announces Management Changes FORT WORTH,TX —June 7,2000—Sabre Holdings Corporation(NYSE: TSG) announced today the following management changes effective immediately in conjunction with its new organization of three strategic business units focused on customer needs. Travel Marketing and Distribution This business group led by Eric J. Speck as group president includes the following business units: - Travel Agency Solutions,the business unit responsible for products and services for the global travel agency community, is under the direction of John Stow,president. Ellen Keszler,who most recently served as senior vice president in the finance division,has been named senior vice president travel agency solutions for the United States and Canada. - Sabre VirtuallyThere,the business unit responsible for the personalized travel Web site, www.virtuallythere.com that provides trip itineraries,destination information and special offers for Sabre Connected travelers will be led by Nancy Raynor,general manager. Raynor has held several product marketing roles in the organization and was most recently responsible for the incubation of Sabre Business Travel Solutions®and Sabre Virtually There. - Sabre Business Travel Solutions,the unit which includes the leading e-commerce end-to-end corporate travel management solution,will continue to be led by Scott W. Smith, general manager. The business units will be supported by: - Scott Alvis, senior vice president travel supplier distribution solutions; - Jeff Harmon, airline and agency Web reservations; and - Thaddeus Arroyo, senior vice president product marketing and development. Outsourcing& Software Solutions This business unit led by Bradford J. Boston as president includes organizations responsible for selling and supporting IT outsourcing, software solutions including decision support systems, consulting and ASP services. Executives include: - Joe Saliba, senior vice president sales and account management; - Phillip Baxter, senior vice president, US Airways account management team-effective August 1; - Steve Trinkle, senior vice president,American Airlines account management team; - Gianni Marostica, senior vice president e-Commerce consulting; - Steve Clampett, senior vice president product development and delivery; - Jim Fitzpatrick,senior vice president outsourcing and delivery; and - Stan Ratcliffe, senior vice president desktop services Emerging Businesses Thomas Klein has been named president of the emerging businesses unit. This organization will explore partnerships,alliances,mergers and acquisitions, and pursue new business initiatives like Web hosting and Sabre®marketplace,the Internet-enabled business-to-business exchange designed primarily for the travel and transportation industries. Klein reports to Sam Gilliland, chief marketing officer, Sabre Inc. Sabre is the global leader in applying information technology to meet the needs of the travel and transportation industries with advanced and innovative technology skills to deliver progressive solutions. Headquartered in Dallas/Fort Worth,Texas,the company has more than 10,000 employees worldwide who span 45 countries. Sabre reported 1999 revenues of$2.4 billion,up 5.6 percent from 1998. Net earnings were$264 million, excluding special items,up 15.2 percent from the prior year. More information on Sabre is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.sabre.com. Sabre and the Sabre logo are registered trademarks of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. News Release Sabre Contacts: Skyfish Contact: Kevin J.Arlington Lee Allentuck Vollmer Fleishman-Hillard (972)488-4790 202-828-9705 kevina@vollmerpr.com allentul@fleishman.com Taylor L. Cole James E.Mckeon Sabre Skyfish (817)963-6537 (617)823 2265 taylor.cole@sabre.com jmckeon@skyfish.com Sabre Sabre and Skyfish Align To Create Aerospace Marketplace Strategic Alliance Focuses on Creating New Benefits FORT WORTH, TX and NEW HAVEN, CT— June 13, 2000 -- Sabre Holdings Corporation (NYSE: TSG), and Skyfish.com today announced that the companies have formed a strategic alliance to create the aerospace industry's first single-source aerospace business-to-business (B2B) electronic marketplace designed exclusively for the transportation and aerospace industries. The agreement will allow both companies to leverage industry expertise and create an e-market providing technical and indirect procurement, decision support technology and other services to the global aerospace industry. In addition to serving as a traditional B2B trading hub for basic e-purchasing, the marketplace will also develop an ASP hosted service portfolio comprising a broad spectrum of e-commerce services and enterprise level, mission-critical applications. Suppliers of aerospace products and services will have the ability to use the yet unnamed exchange to increase market share and sales volumes, expand their customer bases, increase their brand recognition, reduce transaction costs and improve purchasing efficiency. The marketplace will include aspects of aerospace direct and indirect materials procurement, application and decision support technology, and information services. "The combination of Skyfish's experience and technology in the aviation industry with that of Sabre's nearly 40 years of transaction processing and information technology expertise for travel and transportation is a winning combination for the aerospace industry," said Tom Woods, Sabre® Marketplace vice president. "The synergies created by combining Skyfish's assets with Sabre Marketplace, will build a very powerful and compelling exchange." Announced in March of this year, Sabre Marketplace will focus on travel and transportation goods and services by utilizing Ariba's e-commerce technology. The Marketplace will also focus on industry applications, decision support e-consulting services and Web hosting capabilities. Sabre Marketplace will go live with a limited release later this month. -more- Sabre and Skyfish Align To Create Aerospace Marketplace Page 2 "With this alliance, we are responding to feedback from industry leaders who are seeking a single-source e-commerce solution tailored specifically to meet their unique needs," said Steve Casley, president of Skyfish.com. "We are extremely excited about working with Sabre and bringing together other respected players with e-market competency to revolutionize aerospace e-commerce." Skyfish brings expertise in analyzing supply and demand chain processes in the aerospace industry and matches them to sophisticated, online architectures. In addition, Skyfish is emerging to be the single most valuable source of consolidated transaction and decision support systems within the aerospace industry. About Sabre Sabre is the global leader in applying information technology to meet the needs of the travel and transportation industries with advanced and innovative technology skills to deliver progressive solutions. Headquartered in Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, the company has more than 10,000 employees worldwide who span 45 countries. Sabre reported 1999 revenues of$2.4 billion, up 5.6 percent from 1998. Net earnings excluding special items were $264 million, up 15.2 percent from the prior year. More information on Sabre is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.sabre.com. Sabre and the Sabre logo are registered trademarks of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. About Skyfish.com Skyfish.com (www.skyfish.com) provides the aerospace industry with an innovative, web- based platform that links customers, suppliers, content, and data providers, creating tremendous efficiencies and cost savings for the aerospace supply chain. Skyfish.com was a joint venture alliance between BACK Associates, Inc., a market leading information services and consulting firm serving over 600 aerospace companies worldwide, and Synchronaut.com, a new media strategy firm. ### News Release Taylor L. Cole Sabre (817)963-6537 tavlor.cole(a)sabre.com Theda W.Page Whitehead Sabre (817)967-1859 theda.whitehead@dsabre.com ca.re Sabre to Acquire Majority Stake in German-Based Dillon Communication Systems German deal paves the way for Sabre and DCS growth across Europe FORT WORTH, TX—June 26, 2000— Sabre Holdings Corporation (NYSE: TSG) announced today that it has entered into an agreement to acquire a 51 percent stake in Dillon Communication Systems GmbH (DCS). Hamburg-based DCS is widely acknowledged to be the fastest-growing supplier of electronic travel distribution services in Germany and has operations in the United Kingdom, Belgium,the Netherlands,Austria, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Poland. The move increases Sabre's presence in Germany from 1,000 travel agency locations to 5,900. Together, DCS and Sabre will have a combined market share of 30 percent of all German travel agency locations. Sabre anticipates that the deal will boost its German revenues significantly, with travel distribution through Sabre in Germany expected to increase by 100 percent over the next four years. This larger booking base will give the company and Sabre-connected travel agencies more opportunity to use Sabre's value-added solutions for travellers like Sabre Virtually There(www.virtuallythere.com). The two companies will together provide enhanced travel distribution, with greater depth and product range. This includes reservations,ticketing and back-office functions for scheduled and chartered air, hotel,car,rail, ferry and tour products. In addition, both companies plan to continue the integration of current technologies like TCP/IP Internet protocol and Java, along with emerging technologies such as Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), into product offerings. These capabilities, along with the local content DCS is able to provide,will further enhance the companies' drive into the pan-European market for online travel. Chris Kroeger, senior vice president for Sabre's Europe, Middle East and Africa region, said the deal would reinforce Sabre's competitive position in Europe and support the company's strategy—stated earlier this year—of aggressively growing its European market share. Through partnering with Sabre, the deal also allows DCS to expand its content and capabilities throughout Europe. -more- `By combining Sabre's global content and market leadership with the local content and capabilities of DCS, we will both be able to more effectively target strategic markets such as agency chains, franchises and the e-commerce market," Kroeger said. "We each want to strengthen our ability to meet existing customer needs, and to target new segments in the travel market." DCS managing director Tom Dillon said: "The travel industry is changing dramatically. Our common customer base is increasingly specifying the need for pan-European solutions and the DCS/Sabre partnership is in a unique position to meet this demand." Both Dillon and Kroeger emphasised that there would be no redundancies or job losses as a result of the acquisition. Both said that with the anticipated growth of the companies, they would need to grow their teams to meet customer needs. Sabre currently employs 54 people in Germany and DCS employs 100 people. Dillon, who has more than 20 years' experience with travel reservation software, founded DCS in 1990. He will remain with DCS as managing director and will report to Kroeger. Tasso von Heintschel will continue in his position as managing director of Sabre Germany, also reporting to Kroeger. In 1994 DCS and Sabre signed a co-operation agreement to provide access to the Sabre system for German leisure travel suppliers. This has developed successfully over the years and led to the decision to enter into an acquisition agreement. About Sabre Sabre is the global leader in applying information technology to meet the needs of the travel and transportation industries with advanced and innovative technology skills to deliver progressive solutions. Headquartered in Dallas/Fort Worth,Texas,the company has more than 10,000 employees worldwide who span 45 countries. Sabre reported 1999 revenues of$2.4 billion,up 5.6 percent from 1998. Net earnings,excluding special items,were $264 million,up 15.2 percent from the prior year. More information on Sabre is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.sabre.com. Sabre and the Sabre logo are registered trademarks of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. Statements in this news release that are not purely historical facts,including statements about anticipated or expected future revenue and earnings growth,are forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended. All forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to Sabre on the date of this release. Any forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the events or results described in the forward looking statements,including risks related to: Sabre's relationships with American and US Airways and their affiliates;competition and technological innovation by competitors; risks related to Sabre's technology;seasonality of the travel industry and booking revenues;sensitivity to general economic conditions and events that affect airline travel;risks associated with Sabre's international operations;and legal and regulatory issues. Further information regarding factors that could affect Sabre's financial and other results is included in Sabre's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Sabre undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements,whether as a result of new information,future events or otherwise. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. ### .1un-05-00 08 : 42A SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER 8173297497 P.02 American Hometown Leadership ....,,rsa • THE ONLY NATIONAL AWARDS PROGRAM TO RECOGNIZE LEADERS FROM SMALL COMMUNITIES WHOSE COMMUNITY • SERVICE EXHIBITS THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF DEDICATION, ABILITY, CREATIVITY AND LEADERSHIP. •• ,.., ...----,-,....._......—...... ...... '0.9,40-• , c.\ . •3t-1 „qr. .... k 4h• I ' ; ' ; ...dib%.IP' 'IT'?•r'Iligl: •-P11 .7. !''''!'-.."..:Pr'.7:'4.1!444":.4:. .. ,,iljr?.._,.....b..2%- ' •„nisei • ' ; ';'..t j1.;6152AtrAtl'tart, • te..Z1v,t;;.1.*/::-'.4.. /Ai c'., f•„4';'',,,.. . :;•.':117iFICtit:"..*!.,.*:,.aji . OPP i'?,.- • . : - •: ,.......*A 7.04<.,(0i Z---rd ur";. Ira--;•V.p, ........„- _, .• ,.., •r,?.,:e.. f,„: • .. . ,,, ...,„__ , .... ...yr. ;:,. ..%, • . it :' 6.*#•i• 1"Ca...40•1••• k 410-.. .t.'7, . .': .' I -'•-.4 ..• .4 t•'0 IF; : : 0- l •PI 17 ,. ,• • .•r i••;f••••• • . • 7.• • 14,—. ,. . ' . . • . ..--. " l'; '7.,. • ,elt4.-"1 ''•:,-•••••;11- Vt ' • • % t %-tililik -. ,.:::4;;,1-. • .24.-3.r 1; : ! • , .i .; r 4 t:;• ..."•.,•‘••; J':4/ 1.4V,: .r,ii.1):. --- -',7,..tegf:l..' 'eviAs:!'„4.:wmp•74-•-.. • .. , „ ., !f-•k, kitti -. 1,1; .i • ., • , - Ni a..:,' \ ‘.• ,"1,1.4-t%•-'i. . •ipli'lf1:11‘•:kivp.: ** 17.147,4 A '•• ,i • .•. np c • it.:.'0' ......•.; p .f. 4 Ti; :, . , , . k V:ti.._, ...:,..._ ittli.,_,10,0.1 ,... ,......,.. , .*-z.. .. ,,,A 1 ...1.. ti4,.1.:i.:-.;)...i. 1 f.i r.„5.F.I..31,p,..T,..cr...:•,.. it i,,, I ,...,..s..r;s. o,* • ..01 ........,-,7.7 , I Milt •. : . :!,.. zr............,.., .7.4''.t." dt. : 4 .411111111:.:•,?'.....4:/..,,Arr' .Arr. ...b./1:;'re e Allirrit jet I;...7::"...f.;••• .1( i / / / j• . •...114........14 :!:, t.•L..10. • .,tiht .i , • . 1 1 alite/Or 16.1;' .446....:1":. •fo/44f (/, , igtio ..!Z''' '..._.'.4,,d.' _ . I:' Anti'P:\.r .- .---. -1., I--; ,: . ..1 • 'A .441 ,i .oen4/7/,•!:' .,7 ." in ' .J, 1 NMI r ' 1 VI 1-, ..4 • • ,I ., .it -.0..,N.,"•.4.:•',...--":7•• • .',..:lb. •0611171 *- 1 11 il 1 •• ..•:'''Ai .111411;Ii;r ,...-.:..-.,41_11/ rrn alirocie '.. .. .• • .. . .1.1X AIL . Illk:' , ,I.P‘5.:0 ... • • .1: .. VI . i Jun-O5-O0 08: 43A SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER 8173297497 P . 03 t N 2000 AME1LCAN.. HOMETOWN ,, ,, .:,......-... LEAD � }�, V vA. RD` f. �_. j s44 J ,, .. "-� :. S I. _, ;:j,: , , , :_. ,:.-,4.-...,.,..„ ,„„., .,.:,...__„‘....,.„ -i. / -sk .__: ._____ ht,'.,-!.. , 1, -., AA. ,,.. *T,-,....-,, •�,��$`i �'f ; . 1 3+ , 4,� 7 it y.' •+ +�' III y.-y ' I fF r ' f47:2 a _ y•- -Vli‘ T tom . -•• -A:-:- -••:1;z•:.,, 1***------ -- ,4, .' - : it_.•-i- `.• 1 -. •. • P74441-. _ ----_-•-' -a` -•,-,1 • ,i I! 1 ,.?ir R ____ ULES AND REGULATIONS ___________ WHO IS ELIGIBLE? Nominees must be elected officials who who can verify the information. The entries become the property of the "make a difference" in their community local official verifying the information NCSC. and who currently serve on the local must be from the same local government's elected board or council. government as the person nominated. Finalists consent to use their names in The government must serve a publicity and promotional appearances community with a population of 25,000 Limit description of extracurricular in all media,if chosen. The grand prize or fewer. The nominee should have or activities, those not related to the winner will be asked to accept the have had responsibility for an activity project(s),to two paragraphs. award in person at the NCSC national or activities that resulted in a particular conference. All travel expenses will be accomplishment or accomplishments Mail entries to: paid. that benefited the general public. National Center for Small Communi- Some examples include but are not ties,444 N.Capitol Street,N.W.,Suite NCSC and WAL*MART are not limited to: local government cost- 208,Washington, D.C. 20001. responsible for entries that do not arrive cutting;creation and retention of jobs; by the contest deadline due to lost or coordination of a major local volunteer Entries must be received by June 15, misdirected mail. effort;implementing local development 2000. or renovation projects;and establishing Employees of NCSC and new local services or programs. WHAT ARE TILE OTHER RULES? WAL*MART and its subsidiaries, • Previous winners are not eligible. their immediate families, affiliated WHAT ARE THE PRIZES? However-nominees may be from advertising, promotional and public Local government officials will receive the same communities as past relations agencies are ineligible for the WAL*MART Foundation funded winners. award. economic development grants ranging • No joint entries will be accepted. from$1,000 to$5,000. $10,000 will Only individuals will be judged. How ARE THE NOMINATIONS JUDGED? be awarded to the first place winner and • No faxed nomination forms will be Judging and selection of winners will he or she will be recognized at a special accepted. be conducted by the National Center ceremony in September at the National • The award is null and void if the for Small Communities in conjunction Center for Small Communities(NCSC) submitted nomination misrepresents with a panel of small town experts. annual conference. the nominee's record in the community. How DO I NOMINATE SOMEONE? NOTIFICATION OF WINNERS Submit a completed form signed by the The contest is subject to federal,state All winners will be notified by mail in nominator and another elected official and local laws and regulations. All late July/early August. NAME OF NOMINEE RICK STACY r.00AL GOVERNMENT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TITLE MAYOR POPULATION 22,500,AS OF JAN. 1,2000 NOMINEE'S ADDRESS 1725 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. NOMINEE'S TOWN SOUTHLAKE STATE TX ZIP CODE 76092 NOMINEE'S PHONE: DAY: (817)481-5581 EXT. 704 EVENING: Please use the space below and the adjoining page (or submit up to two separate pages separately). We ask that the applications stress measurable achievement, not personal qualities. Additional attachments more than two pages in length will disqualify the nominee. Please type or print legibly. WHAT CRITICAL PROBLEM(S)DID YOUR COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE? Until 1999,the City of Southlake lacked a community focal point. Until the early-1990s,Southlake had been a sparcely-populated, rural setting in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. From 1990 - 2000, an average annual growth rate of approximately 13.3% left the growing residential base without many civic, service and retail operations. Equally critical, the community did not have a downtown or a central meeting area. Additionally,due to the tremendous growth,the City was forced to lease or purchase existing facilities throughout the City to accommodate the increasing personnel base. This scattering of City offices made daily City Hall business confusing and often frustrating for Southlake residents,the development community,and interacting City departments. HOW DID THE NOMINEE LEAD THE COMMUNITY IN RESOLVING THIS/THESE PROBLEM(S)? Lick Stacy, seated as Southlake's mayor from 1996 to present,played a crucial role in the establishment of a public gathering and -meting destination. He was a strong advocate of a downtown development, which would serve as an area for residents of Southlake and surrounding communities to work, shop and eat. Mayor Stacy headed a public referendum to locate and construct a Town Hall within this environment, which would reunite most City departments under one roof. In addition, Town Hall could house Southlake's first public library and a county sub-courthouse. In 1997,Cooper&Stebbins L.P. submitted a request to develop a downtown for Southlake. With this proposal,Mayor Stacy and the City Council approved the zoning and concept plan for Southlake Town Square. This 130-acre, comprehensively master planned development, would encompass over two million square feet of office, retail, and restaurant establishments in a pedestrian-friendly setting. Importantly,Town Square would include over 10 acres of public parks and Southlake Town Hall, which will house many of the City and County offices and the public library, which will be complete in October 2000. The Southlake Post Office, also overburdened by the recent growth, is currently constructing a new facility, with a completion scheduled for October 2000. Soon after the approval of the Southlake Town Square development, Mayor Stacy lead the Council to establish Southlake's first Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ). This 408-acre zone, which encompasses Town Square, will be responsible for the funding of needed community projects such as public infrastructure improvements, public parks, educational facilities, and Town Hall. WHAT CONCRETE RESULTS WERE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE NOMINEE'S LEADERSHIP? (EMPHASIZE SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SUCH AS JOBS CREATED, MONEY SAVED OR RAISED,ETC. STRESS MEASURABLE ACHIEVEMENTS,NOT PERSONAL QUALITIES OF THE NOMINEE). The major result of the nominee's leadership is evident through the success and community support of the Town Square development. The grand opening on March 20, 1999 proved Town Square as a community meeting place. Southlake's first ommunity-wide parade was staged,and numerous retail merchants reported highest sales in the companies' histories. Since this ate,Town Square's saturation has been at 100% for retail and approximately 95%for office. Phase I of Southlake Town Square,being approximately 41 acres, has yielded the creation of approximately 450 new jobs to date. Currently, over 75 businesses are located in the development. The future development of the remaining 89 acres promises to dramatically increase Southlake's employment figures. The 20-year life of the TIRZ is estimated to yield a total tax revenue at over $129,550,000. This revenue consists of the overlapping tax rates for the City, County, County community college district, County hospital district, and independent school 'istrict. Town Square has definitely exhibited a sense of community through the sponsorship of anticipated annual events. It's first annual birthday celebration was held in March 2000, with a parade, petting zoo, and tents and displays by various merchants and civic groups. In addition, the Women's Club sponsored its first annual Art in the Square, which highlighted the talents of local artists. July will host the second annual "Stars and Stripes" Independence Day celebration. And ongoing local band events keep Town Square's weekend schedule filled with the sound of music. LIST SPECIFIC FUNDING SOURCES(E.G.,GRANTS,GRASSROOTS FUNDRAISING)SOUGHT BY THE NOMINEE TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S). As noted, tax revenues from the TIRZ are estimated at over $129,550,000. The TIRZ boundary includes the entirety of Town Square, two major existing commercial developments, two future public school sites, a future stadium and transportation facility for the Carroll Independent School District, and over 5 miles of roadways. Estimated project costs within the TIRZ are approximately $26,000,000. The proposed public improvements in the TIRZ include: acquisition and construction of public works, public improvements, new buildings, structures, and fixtures; financing costs; real property assembly costs; professional services; imputed administrative costs; relocation costs; organizational costs; interest before and during construction and for one year after completion of construction,whether or not capitalized;the cost of operating the reinvestment zone and project facilities; the amount of any contributions made by the municipality from general revenue for the implementation of the project plan; and payments made at the discretion of the governing body of the municipality that the municipality finds necessary or convenient to the creation of the zone or to the implementation of the project plans for the zone. The buy-a-brick program was established to raise additional revenues. This program gives Southlake residents an opportunity for their names to forever be a significant part of the Town Square history. LIST PRIMARY ORGANIZATIONS,GROUPS AND AGENCIES THE NOMINEE COLLABORATED WITH TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS. he major civic groups involved in the Town Square approval process include the Southlake City Council, the Planning and ,oning Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Board. S.P.I.N. (Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods) was a critical group used to educate the community on the Town Square concept. The developer, Cooper & Stebbins LP,was deeply involved with the community throughout the entire development process,and continues to work closely with the City as plans for future phases emerge. Carroll Independent School District and Tarrant County Commissioner's Court have also been actively involved with the success of Town Square. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES BEST DESCRIBES THE NOMINEE'S AREA OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: CHECK NO MORE THAN 3 CATEGORIES. 0 Improved local government management. El Economic development and new job creation. Environmental preservation(e.g.,farm preservation,source water protection,etc.) ❑x Community infrastructure development(roads,water and wastewater,recreation,etc.) Telecommunications and technology development. Planning and cooperation among neighboring communities. The address of the WAL*MART store nearest you is: Street Address. 200 N Kimball Ave City: Southlake State: Texas ZIP: 76092 Store#: 266 Note: It is not necessary to be near a WAL*MART store to enter this contest. "To the best of my knowledge,the information submitted with this nomination is correct." nm 8• U\INT-tied Name of Nominator Signature of Nominator D ime Phone 61Ag ' FAL) Elected local official verifying nomination(print) Ignature f verifying local official _A_. GATEWAYPLAZA mi PROJECT PROFILE June 23, 2000 Southlolç .,'°\ _ .. -/,:a 'v } « _,1- itsi Ili f 41 mittilk , ,7",!11.27:„,..,I... __.-r_dr_:.1-•=r1 •-- ' '.- tm•-• '11;al i la illi '— ' zk.11 T- Department of Economic Development QUICK-GLANCE SUMMARY: • 38 acres • Grand Opening—August 2000 • Zoning: "SP-2" Generalized Site Plan District • 357,000 + s.f. retail&restaurant uses, with limited "C-3" General Commercial District with two pad sites for future uses development CONCEPT: Gateway Plaza is a comprehensively planned development incorporating approximately nineteen lease spaces within the central development (over 321,000 square feet), twelve pad sites (over 36,000 square feet), and two lots (Lot 4 and Lot 5) for future development. Q _,.. • + r �� ta ry% 7 r: - `Ste h" i z - Law. to .Y .. I ! I s.k ; i -t T J i I _ i - .; , �, Northwest Highway Extension 4 - "' - - v :Jim, # ' + 1I'wN I ' tl o aro ,2oi by�a�i 4 IBFg''11'�d`.', . t7 n� 23 500 I I ,_ —.--;--•--F. — i fb w. I '� Haa ' !w+ 1lw� e `t p% sot r woo f zoo ooal l e, ID n F n m_ 0� ' S l �c l tewav 'I A. e.3 s .. ... _ _. 1 -. : $;:_-:::70.7:,2,:eli:ip.iii t r _ . / <� i r vCAct1z,0 M-1_a_n ni i • ('"2-11: \1, 1 11AI F _ �,e= !J 9\ Ste: y!• (`"` Ql \I 4 ! . j y , �r/.'Ma., gill G ,,LEa. 1l' i-3R I it ) l ql' 7 N. vm7, AP � 170S1 _ • .�d 1fM _ 4� S 1�-6v Soothak -- = • i=w `' • GATEWAYPLAZA - PROJECT PROFILE - JUNE 23,2000 - PAGE 1 OF 3 • LOCATION: The Gateway Plaza project is located on approximately 38 acres at the northwest corner of the ,, intersection of State Highway 114 and East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The project will have access to Northwest Highway with the completion of a bridge and ill °°ve Rd N highway extension planned by Texas Department of s Transportation, construction scheduled to begin in ';Highland St January 2000. hist ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with .„,1 limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses IIIII excludingthe followinguses: conventionalgolf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but 5�� excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities; care homes; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services...; business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers, such as stenographers, executive secretaries, etc.; frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios; and requiring that Building 13 be contained in its own lot and to allow single story 0-1 (Office district) uses only or a sit-down restaurant with table service within the same pavement envelope. PROJECT SCHEDULE: - The zoning and concept plan were approved on October 6, 1998. - The site plan was approved on February 2, 1999. - Construction began in the first quarter of 1999 with the opening scheduled for August 2000. FINANCIAL ISSUES: The Gateway Plaza project is estimated to have a construction value of $30,000,000 for the main complex and $5,000,000 for all pad sites at the time of completion of the development. TENANTS: (Confirmed as of June 23, 2000) • Aaron's Arts & Crafts • Kohl's • Bakers Bros. Deli • Krause's Furniture • Bank of America • Leather Direct • Bed, Bath& Beyond • Mattress Firm • Calico Corners • Michaels • Carpet Mills America • Office Max • Center Cleaners • Old Navy • Chipotles Restaurant • Pizza King • Churchill's Fireside & Patio • Rack Room Shoes • Cool Cuts • Red, Hot& Blue • Dress Barn • T.J. Maxx • Fitness Headquarters • Thomasville Galleries • Home Theater Store • Ulta III GATEWAY PLAZA - PROJECT PROFILE - JUNE 23,2000 - PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPER: Lincoln Property Company was formed in 1965 as a development company, for the purpose of building and operating high quality residential communities. In the early 1970's, Lincoln began to expand its product mix to include the full spectrum of commercial properties -- suburban low rise and urban high-rise offices; industrial facilities; neighborhood shopping and specialty retail centers; major mixed-use developments with hotels; and build-to-suit properties. Lincoln developments have been widely recognized as landmarks in their communities for their design, quality, and superior locations. By the end of the 1980's, these projects valued in excess of $12 billion. The successful completion of these diverse, nation-wide development projects required that Lincoln also develop the capabilities, systems, and organization to manage one of the largest portfolios in the country. Lincoln began to gain national recognition for effective management of our own commercial real estate properties and was asked to provide real estate services for other investors and owners around the country. As the 1980's ended, Lincoln responded to the fundamental restructuring of the real estate industry by placing even greater emphasis on our service capabilities, systems development, and overall ability to serve our growing list of clients. Today, Lincoln Property Company is one of the largest, most respected diversified real estate services firms in the United States, employing over 4,000 people. Lincoln has established a presence in over 100 markets in 19 states and manages over 120 million square feet of commercial property nationwide, valued at over$6.4 billion. (Source: http://www.lincolnproperty.com/eastern/index.html) CONTACTS: The following contacts are familiar with the Gateway Plaza project: City of Southlake Economic Development Department, (817) 481-5581 Greg Last, Director, ext. 750 Stefanie E. Wagoner, Specialist, ext. 776 Website: www.ci.southlake.tx.us E-mail: econdev@ci.southlake.tx.us Lincoln Property Company Robert Dozier, Senior Vice President Lincoln Plaza 500 N. Akard, Suite 3300 Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 740-3300 GATEWAY PLAZA - PROJECT PROFILE - JUNE 23,2000 - PAGE 3 OF 3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 7, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: City Manager's Notes and Consent Items for July 18, City Council Meeting • Consent Items. The consent items scheduled for consideration at the July 18 City Council meeting are summarized below. (A draft agenda and packet information for the consent items for the July 18 meeting are attached for your review). ➢ Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the employee handbook to include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy. This policy ensures that all regular, full-time City employees who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake are afforded the protections guaranteed by the worker's compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition with the legally required benefits, this policy provides wage continuation benefits to an employee to provide the employee with their normal "take- home" pay while the employee is unable to work due to an occupational injury or disease. An employee would be eligible for wage continuation for up to 90 days. Currently, the practice is to provide wage continuation benefits for as long as the employee is unable to work, which provides little incentive for an employee to return to work. This policy puts guidelines in place for the length of wage continuation benefits and requirements for an employee to receive these benefits. If there are any questions about this policy, contact Lauren Safranek at ext. 836. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 00-74, Requesting participation by TxDOT for improvements to FM 1938 interchange at SH 114 and FM 1938 improvements from SH 114 to FM 1709. Please refer to my cover memo provided with your packet. If you have any questions or concerns on this issue, contact me. If necessary, any member of the Metroport Transportation Committee is also available. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes and Consent Item information for July 18, 2000 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 4 ➢ Agenda Item No. 5D. Award of bid for metal handrails at Town Hall located in Town Square. The decision was made to readvertise the handrail portion of Town Hall. A bid was submitted in the amount of $58,290 for Wood handrails. A bid for Metal handrails will be submitted on July 17, 2000, allowing for an announcement at the City Council meeting the following day. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5E. Resolution No. 00-73, Amedning the current tax abatement agreement among the City of Southlake, Texas, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre, Inc. As discussed in the memo from Director Last, this amendment does not change any material aspect of the abatement agreements. The first of two changes is related to the fact that Maguire Partners sold the property to Sabre and Sabre is utilizing a trust (TSG Trust 1999-1) as a financing tool to aid in their asset management. The second change is in the "Exhibit B" representations of their planned construction program. This change was needed to accurately reflect the Phase I construction and to align with the master development plan as approved by the City. Contact Greg if you have any questions. • CISD attached article. I believe I know the purpose of this article but I will not speculate at this time. The District should be a little embarrassed by this since Dr. Gillum and the School Board were well aware of the appointment of these officers and the fact that the superintendent, principals, and teachers work with and observe these officers on a daily basis. Within two weeks of Dr. Gillum's appointment, John Knight, Sgt. Bedrick, and myself met with Dr. Gillum and the School Board to explain the program in detail including the funding. I also met with Dr. Gillum and the School Board on the inception of the SRO program and discussed it in its entirety including funding of the program. The City did not invoice in a timely manner, but it would be hard for the school system to not know of the presence of the officers. ' • CISD Roundtable Discussion. CISD is planning a one-day workshop on July 28, 8:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., at the annex building. The workshop will be to discuss and develop a mission / Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes and Consent Item information for July 18, 2000 City Council Meeting Page 3 of 4 vision statement for the school district. CISD is asking that a couple of City Council members participate along with CISD board, PTO members, and Chamber Board members. If you can participate, please let Sandra LeGrand know. • Economic Development workshop. Just a reminder that we discussed holding an Economic Development workshop in the near future. Please let me know your thoughts on this issue so that we can get it scheduled. • Council contact. Please let me know your preference on how you wish to be contacted on non- emergency issues. Currently, Shana and I meet with the Mayor on Council meeting Tuesdays to discuss various issues. • Crime Control Board Appointments. Terms for Board members Pam McCain, Andy Wambsganss, and Bob Mundlin will expire in September. Sandra LeGrand is making arrangements to advertise for applications, and she will contact you to find an appropriate time for interviews. If you have any questions on this matter, contact Sandy. • Also attached to my memo: ❖ AMS ❖ Calendar of meetings / events ❖ KUDOS ❖ July Calendar Highlights ❖ June Monthly Code Enforcement Report • Note that also included in your packet is your mail and the updated DPS box maps. BC ' . Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CM Notes and Consent Item information for July 18, 2000 City Council Meeting Page 4 of 4 Staff Extension Numbers: Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, ext. 767 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 fencing and crosswam saTeTV teen wi„i un ULIG. ,'".,,r..... fencing,similar to rna� e!'�cG. nil: -• issues.The r sidents said that would align the school's fencing, at cam- ^nester plan -they are pleased to have the northeast entrance with Bor- uuseds other CISb be notes- struction n new school located near their Beaux Drive_He also ad- set once the pond and money is not r+e ghborhood, but they are dressed fencing issues rased drainage ditch are covered. available to t � n by the residents. ` yeRt .v ct. -.:..,. CIS of x.r . .k �., �3 District wilt city invoice dressed c;ti �P,ry� ..ral+l' t ti, e i D pay about the si n r " front of the 41 {. �4 Because the city hod sia � `- _ Trustees moving it as h t not invoiced the dis- • f „e agreed to reim- ,t:: from the st ,J , .,i trict since the 1997- ass;ble nn< a a. r horse the City of ,� 98 school ear,CISD P 4.' ''�"'1* ' e',` t-d t�" Southlnke ti�i1� Y slightly ber b '; a ; ` did not payfor its 4.ei $99,393 to fulfill P tween the . �ii'* -;pip,,,, " s. ,' i•,' portion of the 98-99 the curb. a commitment a 'Y'.. ai 'A„� +.. �,� &;�;,, �', r •r� made for school resource salaries. Subsequently,this The sii� �� '.r k c 4 y and DARE officer salaries item did not get included in by CISC T. con. during the 1998-99 school the 1999-2000 school will benke d ' J .. budget. LI �� r.. 3 year. �; r �; Superintendent Dr. Ted Trustees also approved a June 20. `r eir 4 N !,;' .! t' y *,,i + r Gillum said the district and budget amendment up to Fora c ` ":' + , city share responsibilities $135,000 allowing CISD to plan,call t 7 i4 M + 1 for paying the salaries and pay for 1999-2000 charges motion Of ' ...5k111 N<.< .. 1 °�;�$ ii'. 7732. •A .t when an invoice is received_ �„ � ,;. �... „ benefits of the officers. Sce Page Two AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE- Draft Date: 7/7/00 10:30 AM ,I Council Meeting—August 1, 2000 City Council Meeting— August 15, 2000 Reports/Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: 1. Minutes 1. Minutes '2. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a prof servs agr w/JD Wilson and Assoc for development of a strategic plan-SKY 3. Approval of a prof sery agr for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improv to serve the Oak Hill Addn as part of a CDBG-SP 4. Approval of a prof sery agr w/Wiss,Janney,Elstner Assoc.Inc for engineering and design of street rehabilitation in Timberlake and Southview-SP 5. Amend Personnel policy manual to include Drug and Alcohol testing policy for CDL drivers-LS 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139,RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord.No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. ZA 00-053,Z,Tr 3H,T.M.Hood,Glover 2. ZA 00-024,RZ,2929 N.White Ch.,SF-1A,24.414 ac(P&Z tabled to 3. ZA 00-043,SP,JIL Cutom Cabinets,Inc. 1.38 acres July 20 4. ZA 00-073,SP,Consultants in Radiology,PA,6.608 acres 3. Ord.#783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord. Relating to Municipal Court of Record-SL 4. ZA 00-056,ZCP,High Point, 14.654 acres,SF-lA to SF-20A **Pending P&Z Action **Pending P&Z action 1' Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord.No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. Ord.#783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord.Relating to Municipal Court of Record-SL 3. ZA 00-036,PP Simmons Addn **Pending P&Z action 4. ZA 00-068,RSP,Christian Men's Network,3.97 acres 5. ZA 00-056,ZCP,High Point, 14.654 acres, SF-lA to SF-20A 6. ZA 00-057,PP Worthing Addition,6.50 acres 7. ZA 00-070,PR Blk 24,Southlake Town Square,5.624 acres 8. ZA 00-071,PR,Blk 3R,Southlake Town Square,5.234 acres 9. ZA 00-072,RPP,Blk 23,Southlake Town Square,3.518 acres **Pending P&Z Action Resolutions: Resolutions: Consider: Consider: 1. Registration/fee policy for Parks&Rec programs-KH 2. Commercial developers agr for CISD No.6 Addition-CT 3. Award of Bid to for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements along N.Carroll(bid opening 7/13)-SP 4. Award of bid to_for the abandonment of the lift station at Dove Creek (bid opening 7/13)-SP 5. Commercial developer's agr for Southlake Blvd.,Presbyterian Ch-CT 6. Commercial developer's agr for Gateway Plaza Phase 2,Unit 1-CT 7. Residential developer's agr for Crown Ridge Addn Phase IA&1B-CT Discuss: Discuss: Executive Session: Executive Session: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 7/7/00 10:30 AM City Council Meeting— September 5, 2000 City Council Meeting — September 19, 2000 • Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: 1. Authorize IA w/CISD for natatorium—KH 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action 1st Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action Resolutions: Resolutions: Consider: Consider: Discussion: Discussion: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE- Draft Date: 7/7/00 10:30 AM Future City Council Meeting Forum: :onsent: 1. Fort Worth Water Contract-RH 2. Award bid on handrails Town Hall-RH 3. Auth Mayor to execute letter authorizing TxDOT to change speed limits in construction zone on SH 114-SP 4. Award of Bid to for the purchase of furniture for Town Hall"to the AMS under consider items for September 5,2000? 5. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Fina(S-7)-SP 6. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Explorer(S-7)-SP 7. Permission to advertise for bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Davis Blvd.and Continental-SP 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#760,ROW Use Management Ordinance-RH/SKY 2. Ord.483-I,Amendments to Sub Ord No.483,-Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements-CC/KH 3. Ord.No.774,Amendment to Trail System Master Plan-CC/KH Resolutions: 1. Res.99-16,relating to limiting#of zoning applications-from 3/23 CC mtg Consider: 1. Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 2. Prof Services Agreement-Michael Drive(PW-5/4/99) 3. Interlocal Agreement with Grapevine re:North Kimball-RH 4. Auth Mayor to enter into an IA w/NE Tarrant County Regional Water System(NETCRWS)-RH Discuss: 1. Land Conservatory District R,.:";^or o PUD Oro. 2. Utility Policies&Standards Ordinance 3. Street Standard Ordinance 4. 5/16/2000-Ord.759,False alarm Ordinance-GW/DuPre 5. Ord.#_,Sign Ordinance-MJ 6. Ord.762,Adoption of Uniform Fire Code-RB 7. Ord.770,High Grass/Weeds-MJ 8. Ord.771,Nuisance Ordinance-MJ 9. Ord._,Abatement of Hazardous Buildings-MJ 10. **Amendment to Master Thoroughfare Plan-CC 11. Executive Session: Jul , 10 July 2000 1 31 August 20 S__M T_�_-L�_.S S_M_---5--W _T___E_5----. ' 23 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 y 16 2e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 33 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 34 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 23 24 23 26 27 28 29 35 27 28 29 30 31 33 +30 31 Monday,Juy 10 Thursday,July 13 6:00pm 6:30pm Joint SPDC and Parks and Recreation(City Hall) 6:00pm 7:00pm JUC meeting(CISD Admin Building) 7:00pm Park Board(City Hall) 7:00pm 8:00pm SPIN Standing Committee Meeting(Sr.Activity Center) Tuesday,July 11 Friday,July 14 1:15pm Sr.Advisory Committee(Sr.Activity Center) Wednesday,July 121 Saturday,July 15 Sunday,July 16 Meetings Events 1 7/7/00 July 2000 nu9us1200(JuI`, 17 F 5--- S ,lt_---S-YSf---I-F_- 5---- 26 1 : 31 1 2 3 4 5 22 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 29 I 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 33 13 14 15 13 17 25 26 I30 31 25 26 27 28 29 I 24 39 '277 28 29 21 22 23 0 31 25 26 Monday,July 17, Thursday,July 20 7:30am 8:30am Metroport hosted by City ofSouthlake @ City Hall 6:30pm P&Z Meeting(City Hall) Tuesday,July 18i Friday,July 21 7:00pm City Council Meeting(City Hall) Wednesday,July 19 Saturday,July 22 Sunday,July 23 Meetings Events 2 7/7/00 MEWS CLIPPING t Source: SOUTHLAKE JOURNAL Date: FRIDAY, JUNE 23, 2000 Library administrator wins state librarian award for report work McLaughlin one of 34 across nation and U.S. provinces to be recognized by Zach Warner gether might sound simple, but gathered. Complicating the pro- Terry McLaughlin, library it's very complicated and more cess was the fact that the string administrator for the city's future difficult than you might think," of islands, when counting the library,gained much experience said McLaughlin,who began his stretch of water between each. as the state librarian for the report in February of 1999. "I stop,equals a distance of about Commonwealth of the Northern was brand new and I didn't 600 miles. Havingto take aplane Mariana Islands be- to retrieve the infor- fore he took his cur- ;_ x �`n ' 1 t mation at the man is rent job in Southlake. i I .t'►44 S land libraries was very •Some ofhis duties on , " g x F ; time-consuming. the U.S. territorial is- i ,_ The way in lands were very de- , _ which records were manding, but his hard ,,' ,. "" -= kept on the individual work apparently paid <t •4, islands posed another off. '" difficulty. One island McLaughlin was '`� might combine the recently notified that 4" 1 data of their law, col- he was to receive the lege and public librar- 1999 Francis Keppel - ies. Another island Award from the Na- • K might combine the law tional Commission on $ . ` and the public and keep Libraries and Informa- t the college library tion Science (NCLIS) r separate,while yet an- for data reporting that 1 other might combine he gathered from the ; •, the three, as well as many libraries of the ' data on public school islands. The award photo by Ronna Stenger libraries: All of the li- recognizes state librar- Terry McLaughlin, seen here with the abacus brary information had ians across the 50 awarded to him from the NCLIS,was only one of to be broken apart and states, as well as each 34 librarians to receive the 1999 Keppel Award. taken into account of the country's terri- separately. tones,for prompt,complete and know we had to do this report. The data reports included fig- high quality reports. They were pleased to get it on ures such as how many books As the state librarian for the time, because reports are usu- were in each library,circulation 13 islands that make up the Com- ally turned in around five months numbers, growth of the areas monwealth, data reporting for behind schedule." using the libraries and staffing the entire area was one of his The islands had not corn- numbers,just to name a few. It many requirements. It took him pleted the annual report for 18 is a tedious process to take part one month to complete what be- months prior to when in, but it can be very useful, came a huge undertaking. McLaughlin began his work,so McLaughlin said. "Getting the information to- additional information had to be please see LIBRARIAN on page 2 City of Southlake,Texas i SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE DOCUMENTATION FORM - COMMENDATORY This form serves as documentation of employee performance, which is significantly in compliance with or exceeds the current departmental standards. EMPLOYEE: Leonard, Kendall ID#: 156 DIV: Police Services EFFECTIVE ISSUANCE DATE OF COMMENDATION: 06/22/2000 NARRATIVE SUMMARY: On Sunday, June 4, 2000 at approximately 2200 hours, Corporal Kendall Leonard #156 was on patrol in the Commerce/Market Loop/Exchange Blvd. business area. During the business check Corporal Leonard drove around the side of 2840 Market Loop and spotted a white male subject holding something in his hands at window level. Corporal Leonard believed the subject was attempting to break into the business, and immediately called for assistance and detained the subject while officers investigated. During the fast-paced check of the area that followed, officers located a pickup and a trailer that had both been burglarized. Tools and other evidence found on the suspect's person and in the immediate area where he had been detained linked him to the crimes. He was arrested and charged with two counts of`Burglary of a Vehicle." Corporal Leonard's attention to detail and his diligence on patrol duty resulted in the apprehension of a convicted felon who would have almost certainly gotten away with the two burglaries if he had not been apprehended at the scene. Corporal Leonard's efforts reflect favorably not only on himself, but also on the Department of Public Safety, the Police Services Division, and the patrol shift. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: As the issuing supervisor, I acknowledge that the performance cited herein for the above named employee is in significant compliance with or exceeds current departmental standards. The issuance of this form is intended to recognize such performance through positive documentation. The original of this form has been forwarded for placement in the departmental administrative reference files, and a copy has been forwarded to the employee. %Axerf.,,, /59 06-22 -moo Ben A./Brown, Sergeant, Police Services Date /7 / GZLT�,� Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety Date 7202 Dick Fisher Drive North North Richland Hills,Texas 76180 June 7,2000 Mayor,City Manager,or Director of Personnel City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to take the opportunity to express thanks on behalf of my Department for the assistance given us by one of your employees. Earlier today we were dispatched to a reported major accident in the 6400 block of Glenview Drive. Upon our arrival,we found two vehicles involved with one obvious patient. Off-duty Southlake Firefighter Shan Allsbrooks was on the scene,holding traction on the patient's C-spine. He identified himself as a Firefighter and effectively reported the patient's chief complaint and medical history. Although her injuries were not life threatening,he was instrumental in calming the patient in an otherwise traumatic situation. I am convinced that his contributions added to the "Customer Service" afforded our patient. I applaud his willingness to help and the demonstration of his people skills beyond the realm of his employment. Please extend to him our thanks. Respectfully, David Burke Fire Lieutenant North Richland Hills Fire Department D 6-2° a of n cdcoot 1101 aG CalroillAve. South[ e, 2X 76092 Officers/Firefighters Hodges, Wakefield and Urbanosky Southlake Police/Fire Department Southlake,Texas 76092 Dear Officers/Firefighters On behalf of the staff and students at Carroll Intermediate School, this letter is to thank you for the super job you did on Career Day. We realize that you had to rearrange your schedule to spend time with our students, and we are particularly grateful because we know of the many demands on your time. Our students learned from your presentation and are excited about the different career opportunities that were presented to them. We appreciate your example of professionalism and your community support of Carroll Intermediate School. • Have a nice summer! r , cfirn Lim, P�'t- - Stephanie Moore Counselor Carroll Intermediate School 0° b 19' M City of Southlake I- - Public Information Office Contact: L. James Kunke l (817) 481-5581, Ext. 819 July Calendar of Events Wednesday,June 28 Mayor:Rick Stacy July 2—Master Works Music Series,7 p.m.,Family Park Pavilion,Southlake Town Square.Vocalist Dee Dee Gibson will perform this free concert sponsored by City of Southlake and Arts Council of NorthEast Mayor Pro Tern: Tarrant County.Phone:(817)283-3406. Gary Fawks Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: July 3—Stars and Stripes Celebration, 7 p.m., Southlake Town Square.The official Southlake celebra- Ronnie Kendall tion of Independence Day,sponsored by the City of Southlake and Southlake Town Square,will include a children's parade,prizes for patriotic outfits,Lake Cities Communit yBand at 8:30 p.m.and fireworks Councilmembers: at dusk.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756,or(817)329-5566. Keith Shankland Rex Potter Greg Standerfer July 4—Independence Day holiday.City offices will be closed(public safety and other essential servic- Patsy DuPre es will remain open). Regularly schedule City Council meeting will not be held.There will be no resi- City Manager dential curbside garbage or recycling collection. Billy Campbell July 6—Movies in the Park,8 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will fea- Assistant City Manager: ture The Iron Giant,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. Shana K.Yelverton ecretary: July 6 — DARE Day Camp, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., Camp Burnett. This event continues through July 9. a L.LeGrand Registration is limited to the first 20 CISD fifth-and sixth-graders to enroll.Phone: (817)481-2250. July 6 — Seniors "Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 am.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes a scrapbook seminar at 11 a.m.The weekly watercolor art class will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 7—Lake Cities Community Band concert,7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.This is a free public per- formance by the Southlake-based Lake Cities band.Phone:(817)329-5566. July 8—Star Party on the Hill,8:45-11 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.North Texas Skywatch presents this free family evening of telescopes,celestial sightseeing and an interactive slide show.Slide show will move into the Community Center in the event of rain.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. July 11 — Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Games, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 13—Movies in the Park, 8 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will feature Tartan,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext. 756. July 13—Seniors"Beat The Heat" luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m. and includes free hearing screnings starting at 11 am. The weekly watercolor art class will follow at 1 p.m. Phone: (817)481-2776. July 15—Concert on the Hill, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park.The Rankin will present this free public per- formance,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. (CONT.ON NEXT PAGE) 1725 East Southlake Blvd. * Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 * fax (817) 329-1747 1 City of Southiake - ._ �r Public Information Office DUblalc. Contact: L. James Kunke (817) 481-5581, Ext. 819 July Calendar of Events - Cont. Wednesday,June 28 Mayor: Rick Stacy July 18—DARE Polar Ice Night,6:30-9 p.m.,Polar Ice skating rink.Cost is$7 per person and includes Mayor Pro Tern: skate rental.Phone:(817)481-2250. Gary Fawks Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: July 18—Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Sing-A-Long, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m.,Senior Activity Center,307 Ronnie Kendall Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. Councilmembers: July 20—Movies in the Park, 8 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly set.'-s of family movies will -Keith Shankland Rex Potter feature Stuart Little,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. Greg Standerfer Patsy DuPre July 20—Seniors"Beat The Heat"luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m.,Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood City Manager. Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes the Billy Campbell monthly book discussion at noon.Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. Assistant City Manager: July 22—DV8 concert,7 p.m.,Southiake Town Square.This is a free public performance.Phone:(817) Shana K.Yelverton ' 329-5566. Secretary: ira L.LeGrand July 24 — Southlake Chamber of Commerce luncheon, 11:30 a.m., Marriott Solana. Speaker will be Southlake Director of Economic Development Greg Last.Phone:(817)481-8200. July 25 — Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Crafts, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 25 —DARE Skatetown Night, 6:30-8:30 p.m., Skatetown skating rink. Cost is $4 per person and includes skate rental.Phone:(817)481-2250. July 27—Movies in the Park, 8 p.m.,Bicentennial Park.This free weekly series of family movies will feature Charlotte's Web,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.756. July 27—Seniors"Beat The Heat"luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes an Alaska travel video showing and ice cream sundaes at 12:30 p.m.Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 28—Friday Fun Night,6 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood Drive.Seniors are invited to this evening of table games,a movie and refreshments.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 29—Sizzlin Summer Skate Nite,7:30-9:30 p.m.,Bicentennial Park in-line hockey rink.Families are invited to enjoy this free evening of skating and music.Younger skaters will be required to wear helmets. Concessions will be sold.Phone:(817)481-5581,ext.758. July 29—Pontiac Car Club show,3-7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.Phone:(817)329-5566. July 29—Lost Cause concert,7 p.m.,Southiake Town Square.This is a free public performance of rock music.Phone:(817)329-5566. 1725 East Southiake Blvd. * Southiake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 * fax (817) 329-1747 MONTHLY CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT JUNE 2000 SIGNS IN R.O.W ..166 VEHICLES TAGGED .. 8 FOOD VENDORS . 3 TRASH CONT 1 HIGH GRASS/WEED CASES.. 24 TOTAL CASES FOR MONTH 68 TOTAL (excluding high grass/weeds) . 246 f REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: July 18,2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers in City Hall WORK SESSION: 5:30 to 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M. or Immediately Following the Work Session Pre-agenda staff mtg. DRAFT#1 7/7/00 9:49 AM AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.086. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held, under these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 3. INVOCATION: Chaplain of the Month,Reverend Scott Berry, First Baptist Church of Southlake 4. REPORTS: A. Mayor's Report B. City Manager's Report C. SPIN Report D. Parks and Recreation Board Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. I Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT#1 July 18, 2000 Page 2 5. Consent: A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held June 20, 2000. B. Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the Employee Handbook, to include Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy. (LS) C. Resolution No. 00-74, Requesting participation by TxDOT for improvements to FM 1938 interchanges at SH 114 and FM 1938 improvements from SH 114 to FM 1709. (BC) D. Award of bid for metal handrails at Town Hall located in Town Square. (RH) (bid opening 7/17) E. Resolution No. 00-73, Amending the current tax abatement agreement among the City of Southlake, Texas, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; authorizing its execution by the Mayor; and providing an effective date. (GL) REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum 7. Ordinances, second readings,public hearings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-342, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. Location: West side of South Peytonville Avenue approximately 300' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Applicant: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood#16. PUBLIC HEARING. B. Ordinance No. 480-346, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-037), Rezoning on property legally described as Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Location: North side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. SPIN Neighborhood#15. PUBLIC HEARING. r Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT #1 July 18, 2000 Page 3 C. Ordinance No. 480-347, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-040), Rezoning and Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase III, on property legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. Location: 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard being approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Owner and Applicant: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood#7. PUBLIC HEARING. D. Resolution No. 00-71, (ZA 00-041), Specific Use Permit for a carport for a non-residential property per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1(41) for Georgetown Park, at 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard, approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard, being approximately 1.554 acres. A revised site plan will be considered with this item. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Ordinance No. 480-343, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-047), Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. PUBLIC HEARING. F. Ordinance No. 480-344, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-048), Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; being approximately 0.822 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. G. Ordinance No. 480-345, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-064), Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park, on property legally described as Lot 2R2, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT#1 July 18, 2000 Page 4 L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. PUBLIC HEARING. H. ZA 00-060, Site Plan for a portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Campus on portions of Tracts 2A2 and 2A7, U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, and being approximately 25.6 acres. The current zoning is "NR- PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2" Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies, training and conference centers, parking structures, heliport/stop and verti-port/stop,hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses. PUBLIC HEARING. I. Ordinance No. 646-B, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and length of terms. PUBLIC HEARING. J. Ordinance No. 787, 2nd Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. PUBLIC HEARING. K. Ordinance No. 756-A, 2nd Reading, Revisions to the FY 99-00 Budget. PUBLIC HEARING. L. Ordinance No. 784, 2'd Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. PUBLIC HEARING. (SE) M. Ordinance No. 785, 2nd Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. PUBLIC HEARING. (SE) N. Resolution No. 00-75, (ZA 00-052), Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station with a convenience store and a car wash on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT #1 July 18,2000 Page 5 considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. O. Resolution No. 00-76, (ZA 00-080), Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. P. Resolution No. 00-77, (ZA 00-081), Specific Use Permit for outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition (Texaco), being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. Q. Resolution No. 00-78, (ZA 00-069), Specific Use Permit for a church (Lighthouse Community Church) on Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, being approximately 1.085 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. PUBLIC HEARING. R. Resolution 00-79, (ZA 00-078), Specific Use Permit for a shade structure for Mirage Car Wash located at 955 North Davis Boulevard, being approximately 2.00 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. S. ZA 00-066, Site Plan for Southlake Chamber of Commerce, on Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, being approximately 0.458 acres. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. T. ZA 00-025, Site Plan for Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner, being approximately 1.099 acres. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-332, 1st Reading, (ZA 99-139), Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square, on property legally described as Tract 1B3 situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, and being approximately 1.4677 acres. Location: Northwest corner of the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT#1 • July 18,2000 Page 6 intersection of State Highway 114 and Shady Lane. Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Owner and Applicant: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #6. Public Hearing set for August 1, 2000. B. Ordinance No. 480-348, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-053), Rezoning of Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, being approximately 2.86 acres, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District.Public Hearing set for August 1, 2000. C. ZA 00-54, Plat Showing, Lot 17, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706,variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. 9. Resolutions: 10. Other items for consideration: A. Bob Jones Park conceptual plan(KH) B. CARS agreement(KH) C. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Lowe's, (street address). (MJ) D. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Matarangi Limited at 325 Miron Drive. (MJ) (if SKY approves placement on agenda) 11. Other items for discussion: A. Ordinance No. 778, Noise/Nuisance (MJ) and Ordinance No. 480-KK, Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, regarding noise regulations in Ordinance No. 480 to remove any conflict with the provisions of Ordinance No. 778. (KPG) (Both Ord. 778 and 480-KK were tabled at 6/6 P&Z mtg. to the 7/6 P&Z mtg. and are scheduled for CC 7/18) 12. Meeting Adjourned. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT#1 July 18,2000 Page 7 CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, July 14, 2000 at 6:00 p.m.,pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581, extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda DRAFT#1 July 18,2000 Page 8 EXECUTIVE SESSION SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and contemplated litigations, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Carroll/1709 LTD. vs. The Board of Adjustments of the City of Southlake. October 1999. SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City. SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. SECTION 551.086 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS The City Council may deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. A FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING MAY ONLY BE MADE IN OPEN SESSION. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM 1111 July 7, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Lauren Safranek, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the Employee Handbook to Include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy. Action Requested: Consideration of Resolution No. 00-72, approving the amendment of the employee handbook to include the worker's compensation wage continuation policy. Background Information: This policy ensures that all regular, full-time City employees, who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake, are afforded the protections guaranteed by the worker's compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition to the legally required benefits, the City provides a wage continuation program, which • offers supplemental earnings to employees receiving worker's compensation benefits from the City. Worker's compensation income benefits provide an employee with approximately 70% of their monthly earnings if loss time results from an on-the-job injury. This policy supplies wage continuation benefits to an employee to provide the employee with their normal "take-home" pay while unable to work due to an occupational injury or disease. An employee would be eligible for wage continuation for up to 90 days. If after 90 days the employees has not been released by the treating physician to return to full or light duty, the employee may supplement their worker's compensation income benefits with sick leave, vacation leave, or compensatory leave to provide the employee with their normal "take-home" pay. Currently, there is not a policy that regulates wage continuation benefits. However, the practice has been to provide wage continuation to an employee for the entire time they are losing time due to an on-the-job injury. This practice provides little incentive for an employee to do what is necessary to return to work as quickly as possible. This policy provides the.City with some avenues to reinforce to the employee the need to follow the physician's treatment program and to maintain communication • with the City regarding improvement and changes. Most cities provide wage continuation for 30-60 days. This policy is for 90 days because this time frame will generally coincide with Family Medical Leave time, and 5B-1 Billy Campbell July 7, 2000 Page Two the elimination period for the long-term disability benefits provided for employees by the City. Financial Considerations: Adopting a worker's compensation wage continuation policy does not have financial implications. Citizen Input: Not Applicable Board Review: Not Applicable. Legal Review: The attorneys have reviewed the policy and addressed any legal issues pertaining to the worker's compensation wage continuation policy. Alternatives: The alternatives are to not adopt a policy. Supporting Documents: A copy of the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy and Resolution 00-72. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends placing this item on the July 18th, City Council meeting agenda. 5B-2 RESOLUTION NO. 00-72 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS, AMENDING THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK TO INCLUDE THE WORKER'S COMPENSATION WAGE CONTINUATION POLICY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City including the preparation of personnel policies; and WHEREAS, according to the City of Southlake (the "City") Charter section 4.14(9) personnel rules are subject to the approval of Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager recognizes the need to update, revise, or add policies to reflect changes in laws or City practice; and WHEREAS, the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy accomplishes the purposes described above in a manner that accommodates the legitimate interests of the City, now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, THAT: Section 1: The City of Southlake hereby amends the personnel policies to include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy. Section 2: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary 5B-3 City of Southlake Personnel Policies Topic: Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Section: Rules and Regulations Effective Date: Approved BY: Revision Date: 1.0 Purpose: It is the policy of the City of Southlake to ensure that all regular, full-time City employees who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake be afforded the protections guaranteed by the worker's compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition with the legally required benefits, the City provides a wage continuation program, which offers supplemental earnings to employees receiving worker's compensation benefits from the City of Southlake. 2.0 Definitions: 2. 1 Injury- Damage or harm to the physical structure of the body or a part thereof, including any subsequent aggravation or re-injury that occurs while the employee is acting in the course and scope of the employee's employment, and for where compensation is payable under the act and is deemed applicable by the insurance carrier. An "injury" shall not include any illness, disease or infection that is not directly caused by the employee's performance on the job. 2.2 Disease—An abnormal condition of an organ or part that impairs normal physiological functioning, as a result of infection, inherent weakness, or environmental stress as deemed applicable by the insurance carrier. 2.3 First Report of Injury — The Report provides information on the employee claimant, employer, insurance carrier and medical practitioner necessary to begin the claims process. The Act, requires an Employer's First Report of Injury or Illness (TWCC-1) to be filed with the injured worker's insurance carrier, and the injured claimant or the claimant's representative within eight (8) days after the employee's absence from work or receipt of notice of occupational disease. 2.4 Texas Worker's Compensation Act (the Act) — Chapter 401 et seq of the Texas Labor Code, as amended. 2.5 Wage Continuation —A City benefit is designed to provide an employee with the employee's approximate normal "take-home" pay while unable to work due to occupational injury or disease. 5B-4 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 5 3.0 Statutory Benefits: 3.1. TWCC Benefits- An employee who sustains an injury at work may be eligible to receive benefits prescribed by the Act. These benefits include income benefits, medical benefits as reasonably required to cure and relieve the effects of the injury or occupational diseases, and/or death benefits. 3.2. Calculation of TWCC Benefits- State law currently provides that an employee will be eligible for weekly indemnity payments beginning on the eighth calendar day of lost time following an occupational injury. Weekly indemnity payments for compensable injuries are temporary benefits, which will continue until the doctor certifies that the employee has received maximum medical improvement. Weekly indemnity payments for compensable injuries are made in accordance with state law. 3.3 TWCC Benefits Waiting Period- Compensation benefits are subject to qualifications and a seven (7) calendar day waiting period. After 28 calendar days of lost time, and subject to qualifications, the seven-day (7) waiting period will be paid retroactively. 4.0 Wage Continuation Program: 4.1 Start Time for Wage Continuation Benefits- As worker's compensation benefits provide nothing to an employee during the first seven (7) calendar days, wage continuation will provide the employee with his or her regular pay for that period. Should an employee miss 28 or more calendar days due to occupational injury and receive payment for the first seven (7) days, the City will recoup the amount of this payment through payroll deduction. 4.2. Maximum Time for Wage Continuation Benefits- Subject to the provisions outlined below, an employee who sustains an injury in the course and scope of employment and who is eligible for Worker's Compensation benefits, shall be eligible for wage continuation benefits, separate and distinct from and in addition to worker's compensation payments. Wage continuation benefits shall automatically terminate at the expiration of 90 calendar days from the date the employee is first unable to work. In special cases deemed meritorious by the City Manager, such as an employee's application for disability benefits is pending, wage continuation benefits may be continued for up to an additional 30 calendar days. In no event will wage continuation benefits extend past 120 calendar days for any injury, including any later aggravation, relapse, or re- injury. Upon exhaustion of wage continuation benefits, refer to additional benefits described herein. 4.3 Use of Accrued Leave- Once wage continuation benefits have been exhausted, the employee may begin, at his or her option, to use vacation, sick, and 5B-5 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 6 compensatory leave until the employee is released for full-time, regular duty. After all vacation, sick and compensatory leave have been exhausted, the employee will receive only the worker's compensation income benefits until he or she is released for regular or light duty. 5.0 Qualifications to Receive Wage Continuation Benefits: 5.1 Reporting On-the-Job Injury- Any employee who sustains any on-the-job injury, however minor, and who is physically able, must report the injury immediately or by the end of the work shift to the employee's immediate supervisor and receive such medical treatment as may be necessary. 5.2 Temporary and Seasonal Employees- Temporary, temporary part-time, and seasonal employees are ineligible for Wage Continuation Benefits but are eligible for Worker's Compensation payments. 5.3 Income Benefits - An employee must be receiving Income Benefits from the City's worker's compensation insurance provider to be eligible for wage continuation. 5.4 Wage Continuation Benefits After Notice of Retirement or Resignation- An employee who is injured after giving notice of retirement or resignation or after receiving notice that the employee is to be laid off or discharged shall not receive and shall not be eligible for wage continuation benefits beyond the date the retirement, discharge, resignation, or layoff is to be effective. 5.5 Examination by City Physician- The City Manager may require an injured employee, in addition to medical treatment secured by the employee under worker's compensation laws, to submit to examination and treatment at City expense by a physician or psychologist chosen or approved by the City of Southlake as a condition of receiving or continuing to receive wage continuation benefits. 5.6 Light Duty - An employee who is injured must accept light duty assignments if cleared and authorized by the employee's attending physician. Light Duty assignments are given to the injured employee if available. The duties will accommodate the injury of the employee to prevent further irritation of the injury. 6.0 Release and Subrogation of City Rights: 6.1 Release to Return to Work- Before reporting back to work, an employee must provide a written release to his or her supervisor from the attending physician. The release should indicate the employee's fitness to return to duty, stipulate the type of duty permitted, specify any physical restrictions, and the date of the employee's release from medical care. The employee's supervisor shall forward this release to the Human Resources Department. 5B-6 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 7 6.2 Subrogation Rights of City-The City has subrogation rights granted by law or contract for other benefits, including worker's compensation. Therefore, the City shall be subjugated to the rights of the injured employee or the employee's beneficiary as a third party to the extent of the injured employee's wage continuation benefit payments paid to the employee under this policy. 7.0 Ineligibility and Wage Continuation Benefit Termination: An employee may forfeit all rights to initial and/or further wage continuation benefits if the employee: A. fails or refuses to comply with, follow, disregard, or violate the treating physician's instructions regarding treatment and/or rehabilitation of the employee's injury. B. refuses to perform light, partial, or part-time duty when offered by the City of Southiake and which has been authorized by the treating physician. C. refuses to accept or perform a different job with the City when offered by the City Manager and which has been authorized by the treating physician. D. falsifies or misrepresents the employee's physical condition or capacity. E. refuses to return to duty on the workday they have been released by the treating physician. F. fails to contact the employee's immediate supervisor weekly, and notify the supervisor of the employee's condition and expected return to work date. This must continue until a physician's statement is received which states or estimates the period of time the employee will be unable to perform duty. In addition, each time the employee sees a doctor for consultation or treatment, the employee must submit a progress report from the physician to the employee's supervisor and the Human Resources Department. G. has been injured as a result of the employee's failure to observe safety policies, procedures, or instructions as determined by the employee's Department Director or City Manager. H. is found to be working, either part-time or full-time and either for pay or as a volunteer or otherwise, for or on behalf of himself or herself or any other person, firm or corporation, or any other person, firm or corporation, or any other employer. 5B-7 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 8 I. retires, dies, resigns, or is discharged for any reason while receiving wage continuation benefits. J. is injured as the result of the employee's violation of any Federal, State or local law, ordinance or statute. K. Worker's Compensation income benefit terminates. L. fails to keep medical appointments or refuses to submit to an examination or to such diagnostic test, x-rays, surgical procedures, or other as a physician or psychologist prescribes or recommends as medically necessary to identify, diagnose, treat, or cure the employee's injured condition. M. is injured: 1. while engaged in horseplay; 2. intoxicated by alcohol, controlled substances, glue, dangerous drub , aerosol paint; or similar substances; 3. in willful efforts by employee to injure self; 4. by an act of a third person to injure for personal reasons other than through workplace violence; 5. through an act of God (tornado, flood, etc.), unless employment leads to more exposure to risk than the general public; 6. through voluntary participation in off-duty recreational or social activities; or 7. while participating in activities that would be injurious to recovery or failing to limit activities to those that will aid in healing. 8.0 Sick Leave/Vacation Accrual: Sick leave and vacation benefits will continue to accrue at the normal rate for an employee who is receiving wage continuation benefits for a maximum of 90 days. 9.0 Coordination With Long-Term Disability (LTD): If an employee's worker's compensation leave fulfills the waiting period for LTD benefits, then the employee may apply for LTD benefits. LTD benefits will coordinate with the worker's compensation benefits, and the Wage Continuation program. At no time will the employee's total compensation exceed the employee's salary prior to the work-related injury. 5B-8 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 9 RETURN TO DUTY OR LIGHT DUTY PHYSICIAN'S STATEMENT City of Southlake Name of Employee Date of Birth Title of Employee This statement is to determine the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements of his or her position. Please review the attached job description and indicate the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements of the job. If it is determined that the employee may perform the physical requirements with a reasonable accommodation, please indicate the necessary accommodation. This statement will be used to determine the employee's ability to safety and consistently perform the physical requirements of his or her job which may include enforcing and assisting with the safety and security of the public. This information will remain confidential. The employee's t;aproval for the release of this information is indicated on the attached form. Diagnosis of injury/disease Nature of treatment (including surgery and medications prescribed, if any) Please indicate the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements indicated below: Please complete all unless indicated by N/A on the frequency line. Frequency Duration Lifting or carrying 50 lbs.? Lifting or carrying 50- 100 lbs. Bending or stooping? Reaching above shoulder level? Driving equipment/vehicles? Operating heavy machinery? Working with machinery? Climbing ladders, stairs,etc.? Jumping/Stepping off equipment at heights up to 3 feet? Walking? Standing? Sitting? Exposure to extreme temperatures or humidity? 5B-9 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 10 Are there any other physical requirements of the employee's job that the employee cannot safely perform? (see attached job description) What modifications or accommodations can be made to allow this employee to perform the duties of his or her position: _ Would you certify this employee as able to return to full duty status and perform the physical requirements of his or her position? Yes No If not, when will the employee be able to return to full duty status, if known: Additional comments on the physical aspects of the job (limitations, therapy, etc.): 5B-10 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 11 Physician's Signature: Date: Printed/typed name: Address: Phone Number: 5B-11 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 12 EMPLOYEE'S AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION To Whom It May Concern: I, hereby authorize any hospital, physician, medical (employee's name) practitioner, or medically related facility to disclose or furnish to the City of Southlake any and all information with respect to the illness or injury in question for a release to duty. The information provided to the City of Southlake is to be used solely for the determination of a release to duty, light duty or modified work. A photostatic copy of this authorization is to be considered as valid as the original and is effe,.give for the duration of the process. Date Employee's Signature Printed 5B-12 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 7, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-74, Requesting Participation by the State of Texas Department of Transportation for improvements to FM 1938 Interchange at SH 114, and FM 1938 Roadway Improvements from SH 114 to SH 1709. Action Requested: Approval of Resolution No. 00-74, Requesting Participation by the State of Texas Department of Transportation for improvement to FM 1938 Interchange at SH 114, and FM 1938 Roadway Improvements from SH 114 to SH 1709. Background Information: Recall that for several months we visited with Trophy Club to fin a solution to the closing of Kirkwood Boulevard, however, no alternative presented itself that would be acceptable to all parties involved - the Cities of Southlake, Trophy Club, and Westlake, Sabre, and TxDOT. Through the efforts of the Metroport Cities Partnership (MCP) a recommendation to request the State's assistance in participating in an interchange at FM 1938 and SH 114 appears to be a viable solution agreed to by all neighboring cities and corporate business—Fidelity, Sabre, and Maguire Partners. Concerning the FM 1938 extension, Bruce Payne, Greg Last and myself met with the Metroport Transportation Committee again on July 5, 2000. We are still waiting on design and engineering cost estimates. For a summary of information up to this point on this subject, please refer to the attached excerpt from the 6/23/2000 CM Notes. Financial Considerations: None at this time. Participation in the project will be a collection of City and corporate funding. I expect cost to be limited to design and engineering costs. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 00-74 Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 00-74. .5C--/ r Extension of FM 1938. Mayor Stacy and I met with various representatives of our contiguous cities and Metroport Transportation Committee members to discuss the extension of FM 1938 from FM 1709 to SH 114. As most of you know, I try to allow political bodies to bring forth those issue that are important to them and then have staff work toward a successful conclusion. In this particular case, I would like to emphasize the importance of this project. I believe it is imperative that we work as a group to extend this roadway. I feel that there are a lot of advantages (that I will illustrate in a later memo) in working collectively for this expansion. The advantages are not for the sole benefit of our contiguous cities: Southlake's traffic management plan needs this north-south road. I would like to bring forward a resolution that encourages our dedication to this project. As you will recall the last time this plan came forward, various individuals in Westlake were adamant that this project not go forth. Those bridges have been crossed and the Town of Westlake has acquired all of its needed right-of-way. If we go forward with this project, the county will likely acquire the Southlake and Keller portion of the right-of-way needed. Our fiscal participation may be limited to contributing to engineering design work with the cost of that being funded by the various municipalities, Metroport Cities, and private corporations such as Sabre, Fidelity, and Maguire Partners. I am unable to explain the full financial impact due to the fact that we have not received engineering figures or talked with the corporate partners. As I bring the resolution forward, I will illustrate methods for funding, probable city participation, and other pertinent information such as daytime population of Fidelity and Sabre and the current and future impact on Davis Boulevard and on our minimal number of north-south roads. We currently have this impact today without the extended road; we will double or triple our count, which will create more cut-through traffic through our neighborhoods. This road extension also will serve as a viable solution for Southlake in regard to Trophy Club's traffic problems. 3 �cra City of Southlake, Texas k RESOLUTION NO. 00-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, REQUESTING PARTICIPATION BY THE STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO FM 1938 INTERCHANGE AT SH 114, AND FM 1938 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM SH 114 TO SH 1709; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE. WHEREAS, State Highway 114 and State Highway 1709 represent primary east-west means of access for all cities in northeast Tarrant and southern Denton County; and WHEREAS, State Highway 114 and State Highway 1709 do not have an adequate north- south connection to serve increasing commercial and residential development demands; and WHER SAS, the State of Texas Department of Transportation has long recognized the need for a north-south connector for SH 114 and SH 1709 by designating FM 1938, know locally as Precinct Line Road in Keller, a section of Randol Mill Road in Southlake and Precinct Ling Road in Westlake as the preferred north-south connector route; and WHEREAS, the commencement of construction on the Fidelity Investments Regional headquarters in Westlake, initially employing 1,800 people and ultimately employing at least 2,500 people , and the commencement of construction of Sabre, Inc. Headquarters in Southlake, initially employing 2,000 people and ultimately employing as many as 10,000 people, require immediate additional north-south access to prevent dangerous traffic loads on existing north-south residential streets in Westlake, Southlake, and Keller; and WHEREAS, private support from Fidelity Investments, Sabre, Inc., Hillwood Development Corporation, Maguire Partners and many others have committed support for the completion of FM 1938 Interchange and FM 1938 roadway by performing design work, dedicating right-of-way or committing funds to support the project; and WHEREAS, public support for the project has already been received in the form of dedicated right-of-way necessary to construct the project and the necessary adjacent right-of-way dedication for the NETCRWS water line to provide necessary water supply to Southlake, Keller, and Westlake; now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: �"C - 3 Resolution No. 00-74 Page 2 Section 1. That all matters stated in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety. Section 3. That the City of Southlake fully supports the installation of unimpeded "Texas U-turns" to facilitate east and westbound traffic at the FM 1938/SH 114 interchange. Section 4. That the City of Southlake formally requests the timely dedication of discretionary funds by the Texas Department of Transportation to complete the design, engineering and construction of FM 1938 Interchange and FM 1938 roadway from SH 114 to SH 1709. Section 5. That if any provision of this Resolution shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, then the. remainder of such Resolution shall remain in full force and effect as if separately enacted. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 6. 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works Subject: Award of Bids for Handrails for Town Hall Action Requested: Approve the award of bids for the construction and installation of handrails for Town Hall. Background Information: In December 1999, the City advertised for bids for handrails for Town Hall. At that time the bids came in at $250,000 and staff recommended to City Council that this item be rebid. On June 4 & 11 the two elements of this item were advertised. The bids were scheduled to be opened on June 22. One bid was received for the Wood Handrails. One bid for Metal Handrails was received 15 minutes after the bid deadline and this bid was returned, unopened. On July 2 and 9, 2000 this item was readvertised and is scheduled for bid opening on July 17. (A recommendation on the award of Metal Handrails will he made at the work session on July 18.) The bid for the Wood Handrails was in the amount of $58,800. The Construction Manager's estimate for this .item was $60,000. The alternate bid amount needs to be accepted so that the rails match the stain grade wood in the lobby. Financial Considerations: The bid for Wood Handrails was within the funds estimated for this item. An analysis of the Metal Handrails will not be available until the July 18 City Council meeting. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: None. 5D-1 Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Bid tabulation. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the bid from FCS Millwork be accepted for the Wood Handrails. A recommendation for award of the Metal Handrails shall be made at the City Council meeting. • 5D-2 -. Southlake Town Hall-Wooden Guardrail Bid Analysis 7/7/00 BUDGET QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL 06/22/00 BIDS WOODEN GUARDRAILS COMPANY FCS AT MAIN LOBBY 1 LS S 60,000.00 S 60.000.00 GUARDDRAILS IN MAIN LOBBY ,S 36,350.00 AT COUNCIL CHAMEER BALCONY 1. LS INCL INCL. AT COUNCIL CHAMBER BALCONY S 16.820 00 AT COUNCIL CHAMEE.SEATING 1 LS INCL INCL. AT COUNCIL CHAMBER SEATING S 3.930.00 OVERHEAD 1 LS S • S - OVERHEAD INCLUDED FEE _ 1 LS S • S - FEE INCLUDED SALES TAX 1 LS S - S - SALES TAX S 50.00 BONDS 1 LS S INCL. BONDS S 1,140.00 TOTAL 1 LS S • S 60.000.00 SUBTOTAL S 58,290.00 ALTERNATE PRICE: ' I TO PROVIDE CHERRY IN LIEU OF OAK $ 510.00 TOTAL I S 58,800.00 • 5D-. 3 174 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 7, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development SUBJECT: Sabre Corporate Campus Project - Resolution No. 00-73, amending the current tax abatement agreement among the City of Southlake, Texas, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre Inc. a Delaware Corporation; authorizing its execution by the Mayor; and providing an effective date. Action Requested: Approval of the amendment to the current tax abatement agreement. Background Information: The current "Sabre" tax abatement agreement was approved via Resolution 99- 58 and executed on August 10, 1999. They received their zoning and site plan approvals and have begun construction. We previously discussed the likelihood that the abatement agreement exhibits for the "premises" would need to be amended based on the final approved development plan and their construction phasing. The only other change is that the ownership interests were assigned in accordance with provisions of the current agreement. The attached amendment to the tax abatement agreement reflects the following changes: • Entity Name Change: The entities "Maguire Partners-Solana Holdings, L.P." and "Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership" have changed to "First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1" (a synthetic lease arrangement). Synthetic leases are financing vehicles used primarily by investment grade corporations to achieve off- balance sheet accounting (operating lease) for GAAP purposes and on- balance sheet accounting (depreciation deduction) for tax purposes. For construction properties (such as Sabre's new headquarters facility), Sabre is the Construction Agent and responsible for all aspects of the project. Under a synthetic lease, a special purpose entity (TSG Trust 1999-1) is formed to own the property (therefore, TSG Trust 1999-1 is the lessor. Upon project completion, the TSG Trust 1999-1 leases the property to Sabre. Sabre plans to lease the Properties and Improvements from the TSG Trust 1999-1, which is to be a bankruptcy-remote special purpose trust owned by Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association and certain other banks participating in the lending syndicate. • Premises Exhibit Change: The "Exhibit B" of the agreement addresses the various "premises" that represent the multi-year construction program for the Sabre project. This exhibit needs to be amended to reflect the current construction intended for Phase I as well as the approved Development Plan resulting from the city approval process. 5�-1 r� Y ki Financial Considerations: None, there have been no changes to any financial aspect of the agreements. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None required. Legal Review: The city attorneys have been involved in reviewing and modifying the documents as enclosed. Alternatives: Approval, modified approval, denial. Supporting Documents: Attached is the specific document for this agenda item as referenced above. City Council Actions: Staff Recommendation: Consider action desired and approve if found appropriate. 5 E-Z • t • RESOLUTION NO. 00-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CURRENT TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS AMONG THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FIRST SECURITY BANK, NATIONAL ASOCIATION AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE TSG TRUST 1999-1, AND SABRE INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas has approved Resolution No. 99-26 adopting a Tax Abatement Policy which establishes guidelines and criteria governing tax abatement agreements, and electing to become eligible to participate in tax abatement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been presented with an amendment to the current tax abatement agreements ("Agreements") as previously approved by Resolution No. 99-58 by and among the City of Southlake, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre Inc. a Delaware Corporation; and WHEREAS, upon full review and consideration of the amendment, and all matters attendant and related thereto, the City Council is of the opinion that the terms and conditions thereof should be approved, and that the Mayor should be authorized to execute the amendment to the Agreements on behalf of the City of Southlake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the terms of the amendment to the Agreements and the property subject to the Agreements meet the applicable guidelines and criteria governing tax abatement agreements previously adopted by the Southlake City Council. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the contemplated use of the property subject to the amended Agreements and the improvements contemplated thereon in the amount set forth in the Agreements and the other terms of the Agreements are consistent with encouraging development of Reinvestment Zone Number 2 in accordance with the purposes for its creation and are in compliance with the Tax Abatement Policy, Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code, as amended, and all other applicable law. Page 1 5E-3 e SECTION 3. The terms and conditions of the amendment to the Agreements, having been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Southlake and found to be acceptable and in the best interests of the City and its citizens, are hereby approved. SECTION 4. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to deliver (in compliance with Section 312.2041 of the Texas Tax Code) to the presiding officer of the governing body of each other taxing unit in which the property subject to the amendment to the Agreements is located a written notice that the City of Southlake, Texas intends to enter the amendment to the Agreements, which notice shall include a copies of the amendment to the Agreements. SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the amendment to the Agreements and all other documents in connection therewith on behalf of the City, substantially according to the terms and conditions set forth in the amendment to the Agreements. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary Page 2 5E- 4 DRAFT 7-7-00 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Effective as of the latest execution date shown immediately prior to the signatures to this Agreement, the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City"), First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1 ("Owner"), and Sabre Inc., a Delaware corporation, as lessee ("Sabre"), hereby enter into this Amendment ("Amendment") to those Tax Abatement Agreements (A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H) (each, a "Current Abatement Agreement"), each entered into on or about August 10, 1999, and adopted by City Resolution No. 99-58 on July 20, 1999. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on August 10, 1999, the City, Maguire Partners-Solana Holdings, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership, a Texas partnership, and Sabre entered into each Current Abatement Agreement under the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, Texas Tax Code Annotated, Section 312.001 et seq., as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, Tarrant County, Texas joined in the execution of each Current Abatement Agreement with varying terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section VI of each Current Abatement Agreement, the property subject to such Current Abatement Agreement and such Current Abatement Agreement were assigned to Owner, as owner of the relevant property, and Sabre, as lessee of the relevant property, effective September 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 312.208 of the Code and Section XIV of each Current Abatement Agreement, the parties desire to amend Exhibit B of each Current Abatement Agreement to reflect the revised boundaries of the relevant Premises (as defined in each Current Abatement Agreement), which boundaries have been revised to accommodate the current program of construction; and WHEREAS, this Amendment was authorized by resolution of the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City Council") approved at its City Council meeting on the 18th day of July, 2000 (pursuant to City Resolution No. 00-73), authorizing the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City; and WHEREAS, this Amendment was authorized by official action of Owner authorizing the signature hereof on behalf of Owner; and 5 E-5 1 011907.00005:520642.04 i - WHEREAS, this Amendment was authorized by resolution of Sabre, approved in accordance with its charter and bylaws on the day of , 2000, authorizing the signature hereof on behalf of Sabre; and WHEREAS, except as specifically set forth herein, the parties agree that the terms and conditions of each Current Abatement Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, a copy of this Amendment has been furnished, in the manner prescribed by the Code, to the presiding officers of the governing bodies of each of the taxing units in which the premises subject to each Current Abatement Agreement are located; • NOW, THEREFORE, the City, Owner, and Sabre for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby agree as follows: 1. The First Security Bank, National Association, as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1 is the current owner of the property subject to each Current Abatement Agreement (and is "Owner" under each Current Abatement Agreement) and Sabre is the current lessee of each such property, effective September 14, 1999. 2. (a) Current Abatement Agreement A is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 1. (b) Current Abatement Agreement B is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 2. (c) Current Abatement Agreement C is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 3. (d) Current Abatement Agreement D is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 4. (e) Current Abatement Agreement E is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 5. (f) Current Abatement Agreement F is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 6. (g) Current Abatement Agreement G is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 7. (h) Current Abatement Agreement H is amended by replacing Exhibit B to it with Amended Exhibit B to it attached hereto as Exhibit 8. 5E-6 2 011907.00005:520642.04 3. Except as specifically set forth above, the terms and conditions of each Current Abatement Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 3 5 E 011907.00005:520642.04 EXECUTED this day of , 2000,by the City. EXECUTED this day of , 2000,by Owner. EXECUTED this day of ,2000,by Sabre. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 4 5 t -S 011907.00005:520642.04 • i• . FIRST SECURITY BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE TSG TRUST 1999-1 ATTEST: By: Name: Title: SABRE INC. a Delaware corporation ATTEST: By: Name: Title: 5E- (1 5 011907.00005:520642.04 . . MAYOR'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Rick Stacy, Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, that he was duly authorized to perform the same by appropriate resolution of the City Council of the City of Southlake, and that he executed the same as the act of the said City for the purpose and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2000. Notary Public, State of Texas My commission expires 5E_ iO 6 011907.00005:520642.04 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared being the of First Security Bank, National Association, Trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacities therein stated as the act and deed of said entities. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2000. Notary Public, State of Texas My commission expires SE—It 7 011907.00005:520642.04 k . SABRE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared being the of Sabre Inc., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated as the act and deed of said entity. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2000. Notary Public, State of Texas My commission expires SC-12 8 011907.00005:520642.04 COUNTY SIGNATORY PAGE County of Tarrant, Texas STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § Tarrant County ("County"), the undersigned taxing unit, having jurisdiction over the "Premises" as described in each Current Tax Abatement Agreement,joins in the execution of the Amendment in accordance with the terms set forth herein, to each Current Abatement Agreement entered into on or about August 10, 1999 by and among the City of Southlake, Maguire Partners- Solana Holdings, L.P., Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership, and Sabre Inc. ("Sabre") and joined by Tarrant County. Except as provided in the Amendment, the terms and conditions upon which Tarrant County joined in each Current Abatement Agreement remain unchanged. This Amendment was authorized by the minutes of the Commissioners Court of Tarrant County, Texas, at its meeting on the day of , 2000, whereupon it was duly determined by appropriate order that the County Judge would execute the Agreement on behalf of Tarrant County, Texas COUNTY OF TARRANT,TEXAS Torn Vandergriff County Judge Date Executed: 5E-'3 9 011907.00005:520642.04 FIRST SECURITY BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE TSG TRUST 1999-1 ATTEST: ' By: Name: Title: SABRE INC. a Delaware corporation ATTEST: By: Name: Title: 5E -14 10 011907.00005:520642.04 4 y • . • COUNTY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Tom Vandergriff, County Judge of TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, a subdivision of the State of Texas, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, a subdivision of the State of Texas, that he was duly authorized to perform the same by appropriate order of the Commissioners Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and that he executed the same as the act of the said County for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of , 2000. Notary Public, State of Texas My commission expires 5t- 15 11 011907.00005:520642.04 a . y . • EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement A o'-i<i� ':i bid / _ "gag . 11 I ' E A'�N's i a�i"..*„..r. : N'aperapifviYi9'.AA.�d•nI.@/" ./.O✓�'/ y ��\� _ -—'� r .i' FY:L_J cs2� ems- /e ms �. .,�" 1 p tr- 1 .'.'• :, ---,..7-- 41",,,,,,,r4,,,,::;;;,„,;,,0-0, „,,,4,,,:0. ..-->00„,„,- .......--,..-. 400•1..0- , _,0 x: ,,,--------A , ..• _,„:„. ,,,,,,,,,,- .. , i.,...--",........:-.-:,_ :,..40,...-04.,... ti ,... 'zi 11,et, 0 ' \ ___0,-.4,.-4111,,-•->°, 3", ".7000:0,#0 .Wi*VtI.V"(01-; 4 . w•;.. • �- .�•-..sw .r am /. +,�^ ':J�y/ 0.•. � :•.- .°�. y ft '.--.••�i4 .r�ir� /041; • j ice' � 1/„/,, , Atif f !, • /.." Diced/ t \; ! % s'� ® ¢y as 4 , -_ \ 1-, :::::::,i,„,„,„„„„" . ,,..,„,, 1 4 N ssi:f ; . ‘44, \,\ •••:fe:11. :,:;=',./.',.', '-'"--- -w''.-(6,,,I,Ur i I II.1".""St i 101 \ I \‘:\.,.. 1.1.....,...r:•:.r‘::./....................,...... P f,...,... .. I „ 1 � �__, ........ . . Itk,�1a.._ 71 ' ---:4- V , , 1 • ( - .,.\ (7. ......i.. . , \\.04::, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,: k ,...--._,,,,,:,,•;:„„iiii,,,s 11 ,,y, ----:, :•--- ik, , ,„, ,...., , ... ....- \ , :::::::::::::: i ,,,,, .,,, 1 e tli, ..: - . ._4 .: ' ...q- ...' : ,,iiiiiii \;.;;.'"' 'is4 „„...._., liai, .‘,„ ,,,,.... i 0 -Awsmffl to..,61; .• " - —- t . ,.. . ': a F _..7111111 d ti1 . '. \``,6 O 4. ! \ \ .., ....;;;;;;;;; ,o:\ .:. \. y�' :::,;. .,. .,- .',' . 5. N7 .1tN \\??C;1.4'•; s i i;..4:; w✓J lam. tiwi aio sires \ \ \\ /- F - • \ \ \ l3 :Ewi 12 5E-16 011907.00005:520642.04 b0'Z690Z S:S0000'L06I I 0 LI— as £i •per OTY W17 P i !.:%c:-•'•sue. \ r • 1 a' �w lc ; •I '9�q,.••Si •1%,.,\• • ",ni,A i �.�k w s:; ,Nw y� a .-,..-.0,1,‘. .1.;:::::::::,,, ,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;;;;;;;:!1;;" .:«'.)\. 5 • • si� t'`, fi r' ® / S/, \ - ,...1:::::::: :,-., Ii.4.,: • • ., . .,.... )lit.' 'I lil •:::,• ,,,„„„„1 p. • • - • ..;;;,1\ _ O • ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„��"\ . \\ • S 0140 1•—•"""•""';-, \ ' Zif a,4 ifli . ' \ie.�' \ ' _ ' " i!►�� Ou 1i i ,;;y Mtf M "Bq 2. 4,aL�K'R,Rk. \ ..- go �,^. ,� - ,��0��5� r Lb.LbLa..ti�y♦ s, V"rwbvR� 'y, �,, . ua r ,�r f7 ova a arc�► Hf H�'•'; \ w .4 y�r �' i sia ��� �14,2 4���1 na 1! b14444104114.41.� :. _` �• .in�q:o. ib•1•••41�d ha ,`, Nip 4♦1..,Ti�,;�MQ yu M��J�'-.•44♦:0HOiry1►y�,".�a I' tA 1 h 1.4i►i!.�*•♦•♦4, ,d`►�.R a. -♦babhay*I,pe) 4si!4fts41j4,1„�♦zgi7♦M:a..,-,�,.. ,1•4;1 •����'�'e. ' ►' .. •. -V"♦`4 owns. i'�s'ha.'i".Z.sty�S grbW .' < b ►,► ► ♦♦7 t raii.0y}44/ 4, 1.47,44 4AIX 4474374IL4 7414 4 V.Variy ftt ! of / ;►4 'Mi4.O4O44o' M v* 4 i 4#♦4470 :3; 44rvirlreit aftitt m♦M41', ab�f�ti3N ,:%ewer .�.NI.4.�� <11 • ill ."1 ♦ t d' 'bpi iZI b �b� �►♦a'Ra♦4F'R�• L ;Oct , :i,114t44441 4Veigtr 4)/4,44: 444,A i rce 41/44**ars*4.1ft,:t''.,,i • y% s f•♦►1 d4 Ct��1+�ra�4yQE�7jilb$il�W♦4dt��i4 ��ePe. \•. ,• �r ".s, ;.'�Y �� Qs r., =�,44.*4`;�gerMr_�s �-e-T4 y'r.c 53 -74 r,� � %// +�c --.;s timlo-T-, -, -, -______L--• ,. fir r # i l'-I V * , I X: -N, • / // '4` ;\ 1�1 m r „ram ,il: . \mac,; :f% :f S7:% / /,':::::::: :: , SF •.'‘ �' iz p i:+477:x7, ,7471%,• •7 . JTI- "Gaxricoo '"".a'' 13 1 �� �` Tis Ernear.. _mo d LS: tl!sk.- g luauiaa.iay luauualegv xe1, of g ligigxg papuauuv SINaIAIggH V 1NaI I1IVfV XVI at ZMLL%IQAigNV al 11IfIHX1 • 4 - - EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement C 14 ..witikiH: . _ ...---..__,._— ,:)" :: ", -- ;., „,--_________—•--_;....... \•—•;I:ti'liiir?•''' ' ..... TN-7---. -- ii.::-ii :;:. :.:;',"1,,•-$11::::,:::::::::'v-------- ------:,;',....- \:::?5;' "'V. 7 '. -7 • 14, ‘1\ \ iligl 1 :;::44'': i'''' ''."'7/ \..CA -.•'''''0'," _ T ,, ,`,\, \ , " "i li'' : ::::,',/ 1 :)::•. :. i :. \i:. \‘ ';. ,,,,,,, ,4,1.1,. . , 5, ' ' / . '4' .-- :, - .‘\'''''':.\e-t. ,... z . , ____;:iy--:--;"' '''''''''''''T.''''''3::::1,, :::: ,. -A itrq< .' 1 i \ 1-.4;0-..1' EM' EE ',:''''*;57'''; '"": ' (:), :•:: -- ii\41111rialEal ''''/'-'''-' .; - •*;:0:57.+T:•iiii'•:;iiiiNiiWTI:'i .:71' 5 ii• '-‘0.7 . '' - \ 3' -� , pgPyy 6' % *is :„.. �c;NSk f: ,:::::::.::::. ,.:::::.:""""" . O PlihIwo' / gip.�� ''l. ::',„...- F•JI.Y �I ill . �a\ \ ce: sisa .;.................... wv;., //� Fi' , \ 0,,,,,,,,,;.• , \ \.44,•pi :::;:urir:. i50,--VeV , . / . / ,4, ,Witrar.,.. . 0 14 •tc \ . ,,,,, L. alilittelp /y \,'.ebb " ':' O ' � " t; \\I ,/�'siais�. JJ \ J. b .d n wiuoarm '�'� � -e - 6• ^ - \ \` a *iltf 14 5E—IS 011907.00005:520642.04 EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement D gac '':--41.-:-.,.-7.. . ..,,.., .., -.. ,N,..._v_g_,...77:11::::::-;;;I!.?.....=:-..--...--iir:10,,,w.x' #.1"77r"" . . \\;,,;:.lignoitt k.-,,A iiiiifro -7u,-------:-Itt, ,.. \,, \ 1.igt ':: :.„:::::::::'''''' _----__ ,,,cii \vc:,'''::v::El .1:77 r. tit s' \7' ; VI :.::,..... 2./. --"--"7:.77.''. '', s N.,1•.\ill, i 0 1 fit I'# i ., :/ i.,,"..". """ �. n r t;; „ „-/ d4 ,‘ . .,--,..,:-4,4;:T.1:11 :ii'::: :...... :.„ ' : N Vitileigillk I\ ,.•':,i;,.'1...1, l' s 't• i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::•4.../:::.7 ''.7"...;:: , 4,,,,,.._:. s 111 o i g ,-- t/JY♦;S' :i„ ' O ,\, . 0 �' �, a ti. gC -- t!.., ''0. 'mu!imT,Iwt:i4.f:immiii ,',I. ' ., ',T....,,,rr:..--'"sSll I ',;,..1,,' )ii ; •, , .,,,, -,:okimiiiff-..,', 4," t." ' /0 "e ji 1111111116 ,i',. -- ) --;.4- \ \ "--..t.z"1--_,Y ." '::::::::':":'::::':::: rii •-• -•-•:;;-, „--- ',.n: ::::::: : :::: :::: iri die ,,, ,./ 1 . (i • 1, j Te € \\ . 0. ........... ............II 1 !ffifirrm.,....--a. i ... i :. ,,..1. 1.) '' '. .' \ •*'°\t\ ';:iiiiiiiiiiii -'lliiiiii,i iiiiitilli e ii\ .-. . ._-_-- i a 01 1 . . ..,_;\ - *0„,,..\\ / - ,.::.;;;;•:, A:::;;;;;;;;;;• ......... , .. . 1 \ibi- \ .•;:::::::: 111.V\:.:0:;: : ..'rill=mos 411111-1.3".:-.- " \ •O 4i4z4, .. „fit ' 4,, - ,. 0_,,,,6 • ..\\ . ... t \‘',..t.'"'" :; :::'-. 44.,;" r;.-"' 7 A • \ ‘..s\\4::/:i giiiT; 1;:T... .: A6'5* ,i ' '''' ,:2 7 ,. - • \\ Ly."."..•� -� ± s zi - �6' ci itAlA1G _ �q _- • ii�ri Nn aniuiR \\1 '^ e i — =SE1 15 SE - I9 011907.00005:520642.04 EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement E ",--:- - aia •i! 3� it � aaa. t �l R ___ y.:: ;;E::/: .,,-,0 .,-:::: ::::: :,pi, NE",. /". -- `•c-*:.,\kiit-,F4 - - ui ; -,..c.„----4 1 ,.. \ _ - .. - - , ..--......, — \' k\:''''' .',n ti , \ .A;:...x 1:4:::, :: :::::::::::::5" / ,--_,----- ---, F-ki • IV -- - • i:::::::::::? / .1..- tVot ' i\,k \'3,-:;:. ...'" "" .....V / /;::: iiinPi::..'\ \N ;', .:\i '' t§ i,,,,.r,,,i, tu_II- ,,416 j!.''''2 // ;/ '`'"...... T • \4•':.;• :•\•\ 0 I 1..ttl 0.,,,,,t, a . Q t•.. \ .III s: • L',:i.::,::7*..?!:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4.„...=4: ,' ','i : :: 1.,i \44104-014 :•••-r-,-1-/k weiSili 1:1100 H I . iy � 'SeR , : i sm ` 'Y . i 'g� am O m� a ;`;— !it, ,/,, s :// ...... ..m ' # , c'', c is :2s: . ',, A i y�_ ! ,••i . • \ \ ,:::;..,:;:•::::•::::.,•,/,:::: :: :: : 'rag'tt,'„?... ..,' OA i / II` 2 . • S •\\ :_.=j' i1s bl , h, \ \•4, i'.:i :::::ii4;;;,,W0044,,,,,, IIII 'MIL ‘-' ti ' ...--::`,. \ - 1 .. „r---- .,•. \ ';':.i:!:::::::, AZ t \.; , jam 1 4, .�'" ! t 0Ie," •, „ -,.;., ,'"" . s — . " . . ,9 1,1;11, _ ''111114.. ! ' A..:;. :::::::::: •••• - ittf = '',..5.%. \I \ 4::; •..... . ::: J �•% • �:e,.;A fix\��: �\\ - � _ b =_t@ 16 SE- 2O 011907.00005:520642.04 • EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement F ,`-,- ,if,.¢- .gip !p! / z as A I '' � ry I Vi ;, 1 CI • S ' c.: ' US�.� p' :Lij \ da.' " ' Ill - l'1 \fi: " it F: ir tiiii, •, i . ,„ „ :;;;;;;;;;;; / ,x;;;Vil '•' .i : : 1',,, iii - afte. ,vocr•ot:'t-ii• ;.10„„ r // •`‘ t ..."""‘1.0„,„„,„4:1--„,___ ,..,".-. ,,,,.',' .. . ,,,..X.. ,,.. ..1 ;,,„ 'I l'k ® ilik -.ail144 k\VW4:I. ..-*.I 7. '\ J ri ,ii O off I .1:?,: :.• ;, . Ai •-\‘ it e ! \ \ .� " s ° y� .%�y�, / 5 '�, \ \*". It:;::: /:/0111,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ®1 i \PA 111 0 \ \ . • ;;;;;;;;;;;;-„, • .0•:::•Worga„„„,. Ili -;', 4' e 0,,0'� /- It 4 �- i -- -. n,�.z . - ,�!i Lis :: �Q ��7111a -- 4 { aye O ,!•• • 1. 'At s. -4 \, "s"si \.s ..:., o x,-OP/ 3 17 SE -at 011907.00005:520642.04 . y / �-3 lI 1. es.'\ Z, 400;',.-1' ; # 5 ,or* KIPARK AOOn M0.I ` li ,�.��r4Y ;@�• `� � 11 1 \ ,e :ice:=Al f; I a M Iiya . ;.� ,u:, u:rwak COC i7 II 7--—-AIM. - 00 fit 7 �4........ . .% © is. ;„: O � N. „. • o ' !i AD Iv z i�j/ • •. __ it.\ • ,. ... ••.. ,�. •\ �. `. ' M, zz, % . . ..„ s* •\••••` ,'A' %N.N.% •:::: ,-lc nomM0-11.11 ap,ippi c *' 0 ,- ‘:, .., i7sziil\\ k"./'. I I.* t21 7„,/itr‘ \Nr\-:14:-•• ,.t..\. \ ii -- --- .NT!. -,-0----1 (..) i 4 —•A‘\ \s \\\\ \ ,\ N \\,‘ .s.cs *.N•vN-twissa=2"' g9 'Isji,r1-#1 :// A:1111 s -3 .-s\\\.\\\ ................. mo- 11SSEIRmit c . ;:; t::; ,,,, . . . . ,:.,‘„,,,,,,,,... ,,..„,... N 11. NKA s......... 'k•,,*'0,441 %ON .'\I. 0 ® ' /.?..„ n g ,,,,, t\v" I\ ,,, . 1 . \ \ \D 4. nr smttr ipw L11 \\ �` l0 p mitt P EET.ItO a t\`\� \ j `NT,Yt `'�\ �w,_ ,\ nme, \ •‘ .\�• 11 m.-,Q, Sri+ \ �'[• 'c3,^ o N ' ,1 I , ,< .. :iem F —�—��..,(e J IID74 rc + �a.n.. -\ 4..r p 1 -��� • iii : s :o a L.(.1..a '- 'm` '�.! _ _ ,`•\� 'J �•y 7'•Aliarilg• _ �1.._Iau[.ina1 'e �- ���� ��'` 1 = T. — _ .om Pw.s.•\�.\o• i(� 1 /L � - r—A,•.--. WHITE piAPEL RD. ,4 • EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS Amended Exhibit B to Tax Abatement Agreement H ;=1 r :; ii / .I \- arryer avc m a _ .7y�y�pl�C.'6�/.,.; hh I'�''��7T.++n u�lL�lyi ;mod:::....,. , ` 4s`F' :r;, Itt11�'' Sig - �� �%aid : 1y� Y/ ... ,\ �. �:'�� .!' ,...„,• 0 IIN 10%\'.',,P"P:-',-4 v .% ,f--:,,riL•A" 1,-,:r• ';;;;;:, 1\ le4e,01( A. 0.4-;-'7,' i No,-.-r:'.............................r...... -:.„„f ,:„„„,. :: c) ,, A ;,/./-.1i, I 4.........„...........„......, ,,,,,,,,:::,,,,,: ::•:.Y.. .: Ali • \ _ \ ,,4tf:'..' I .1 ::::;:•-;•„„.„„.........„. ..„.t2, „ itow fly ,i ,•y,,,.k. ,1/4% , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,r,,,,,,,,-..., ,;„:::.:,...:::;, . .,, ,,,,e. . 1g W !.. 6 . 3 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ' Ni �) ¢ � a �`,_;,: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„„,,„„,lilii,iiiiiiiiiii . \ ..\\.4,\*•,,,..:0,A ; /,::1!i!iiii!iiFi::,!: razifft!I,rri."2".."21 'AT-A i lg. ' ... ......7:„........... .„„ II a cr...., \ \,.t."'.."',:!::,, 'lc ",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:;,...... . ',itt si , ,. ,,,,,,,,;::::,„„ „, „„ ta,....._ - ( t: • . b \\ . .v. ,,4iimi:::,, . © iiiiir.111 . ,...:.,:",.:.:;.:. iii 1 ,...„„,„:.;:iiiii: 1..r. , :". .s. .. ,) , .... s ;,: n:.:: 1 .„.„.,,,,,„ ... 0 14, ..:., • .. : „.. .< ,...:::::::::::: ......, 4..„ . 4•„:„:::: :,..:it PI fil ' :, - '. - \ %Az, • < ',. .k.%"7" 4 rt, .44.1.,,,00 \.,..if - \,..,.4., . .„.:::;::: , .., f.,.. , • .., .,-... ,....,-,0. @ . , I.: _.--11% 41 i'l ----- , -'':',-er-vicii, ' .. ,,, : 8 •714 -tt I .\:"*.(14/y.7 %; ,, , ,.,,:,,,'.;;;;:::;','" "" kA V ,...--' 1 \\\sd...,'S :::::,,,,,,,,,,....„.,... .:te.,:" _‘;/."..‘.,;,,,, 5ct si.nnio \ �� / atett - _ BB �\ a iagi 19 SE -23 011907.00005:520642.04 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Agenda Item No. 5A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held June 20, 2000 and the Special City Council meeting on June 26, 2000. If you have any changes to the minutes, please discuss these at the work session or notify Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting. She will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration. Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the employee handbook to include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy. (Some changes from last week's version have been made based on feedback received from staff The changes do not alter the nature of the policy, only add clarification. These changes are bolded throughout the document in your packet.) This policy ensures that all City employees who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake are afforded the protections guaranteed by the worker's compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition to the legally required benefits, this policy provides wage continuation benefits to an employee to provide normal "take-home" pay while an employee is unable to work due to an occupational injury or disease. A full-time employee would be eligible for wage continuation for up to 90 days. Currently, the practice is to provide wage continuation benefits for as long as the employee is unable to work, which provides little incentive for an employee to return to work. This policy puts guidelines in place for the length of wage continuation benefits and requirements of an employee to receive these benefits. If there are any questions about this policy, contact Lauren Safranek. Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 00-74, Requesting participation by TxDOT for improvements and expansion of FM 1938, was pulled from the agenda pending further information being provided to the public through SPIN. Note the attached memo from James Kunke concerning a Special SPIN Standing Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 19. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 2 of 23 Agenda Item No. 5D. Award of bid for metal handrails at Town Hall located in Town Square. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) The decision was made to readvertise the handrail portion of Town Hall. A bid was submitted in the amount of $58,290 for wood handrails. A bid for metal handrails will be submitted on July 17, allowing for an announcement at the City Council meeting the following day. Contact Ron Harper with questions on this item. Agenda Item No. 5E. Resolution No. 00-73, Amending the current tax abatement agreement among the City of Southlake, Texas, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre, Inc. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) As discussed in the memo from Greg Last, this amendment does not change any material aspect of the abatement agreements. The first of two changes is related to the fact that Maguire Partners sold the property to Sabre and Sabre is utilizing a trust (TSG Trust 1999-1) as a financing tool to aid in its asset management. The second change is in the "Exhibit B" representation of its planned construction program. This change was needed to accurately reflect the Phase I construction and to align with the master development plan as approved by the City. Contact Greg if you have any questions. Agenda Item No. 5F. Approval of Change Order No. 2 for work at Town Hall. (This consent item was not included in your off-week packet.) There are certain elements of the audiovisual portion of Town Hall that should be done while there are still open walls and ceilings. The A/V consultant has identified these areas and this change order authorizes the Construction Manager to proceed with these items at this time. The A/V portion of Town Hall will be going out for bids within the next several weeks. Council Member Potter has been working with staff and the consultant on this item. Any questions should be directed to Ron Harper. Agenda Item No. 5G. Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer agreement for Gateway Plaza, Phase 2, Unit 1. (This consent item was not included in your off-week packet.) Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 3 of 23 This is the City's standard commercial developer's agreement for public improvements in Gateway Plaza Phase II. As you will recall, this is the second phase of the Gateway Plaza development that includes Costco and the construction of Nolen Drive between FM 1709 and SH 114. The developer's agreement includes the following issues: 1. The developer is requesting roadway impact fees credit for the construction of Nolen Drive because Nolen Drive is on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan as an arterial and that requires a wider street (five lanes instead of three lanes) than is required to serve the development. The total estimated cost of the street is $376,980. The estimated total of the Roadway Impact Fees for this development is approximately $267,226. The cost of the extra two lanes would be less than half of the cost of the street. If the Council chooses to give the developer credit on the impact fees, would it be based upon constructing the entire street or the over-width portion? 2. The developer is requesting that the over-size reimbursement for the 12" water line, which is calculated to be $40,300, be done by giving the developer credit on the water impact fee for the entire development of Gateway Plaza Phase II. The estimated water impact fee for Gateway Plaza Phase II is approximately $50,000. 3. The required land dedication for this 37.56-acre non-residential development is 0.94 acres, or $30,048 in fees in lieu of land dedication. The Park Board approved a recommendation to accept credits for the construction of 710 linear feet of 8-foot-wide public trail for Gateway Plaza II and III as meeting the park dedication requirements for this development. The developer committed to the Park Board to keep and maintain an additional open space of 83,237 square feet in Phase III. Agenda Item No. 5H. Ordinance No. 480-348, 1S` Reading, ZA 00-053, Rezoning Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey. (This consent item was not included in your off-week packet.) This request is for a rezoning of Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, involving 2.86 acres located approximately 450' east of the North Peytonville Avenue right-of-way. There is an existing 50' road easement serving this lot, and the developed residential lots to the south and west Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 4 of 23 of this tract. The Coventry Manor subdivision (PUD #7) is located along the eastern boundary of this tract. The property to the north and west of this tract are zoned "SF1-A." The property to the south is zoned "AG." The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural district. The requested zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential district. The land use category is Low Density Residential. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Lisa Sudbury. Agenda Item No. 5I. ZA 00-54, Plat Showing, Lot 17, Thomas M. Hood Survey. (This consent item was not included in your off-week packet.) This request is for a plat on Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, involving 2.86 acres located approximately 450' east of the North Peytonville Avenue right-of-way. There is an existing 50' access easement serving this lot, and the developed residential lots to the south and west of this tract. The Coventry Manor subdivision (PUD #7) is located along the eastern boundary of this tract. The property to the north and west of this tract are zoned "SF1-A". The property to the south is zoned "AG". The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural district. The land use category is Low Density Residential. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Lisa Sudbury. Agenda Item No. 7A.Ordinance No. 480-342, 2'd Reading, ZA 00-016, Rezoning, Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C, W.R. Eaves Survey. This site is located south of the Walgreen site on the west side of S. Peytonville Ave. The zoning change is being made to comply with a commitment made to the City Council by the Walgreen developer. They do not have a user for the property and have requested deferral of the plan requirement. It should be noted that prior to issuance of any building permit a site plan must be approved by the City Council. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 5 of 23 On May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0). On June 6, 2000, the City Council approved (6-0) on consent to table at the applicant's request to the June 20, 2000, meeting. On June 20, 2000, the City Council approved (7-0) first reading on consent. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Karen Gandy. Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-346, 2°d Reading, ZA 00-037, Rezoning, Tract 4G1 and 4H, J.J. Freshour Survey. This property is located on Johnson Road, approximately 6(.)' east of North Pearson Lane, west of and adjacent to Vista Trails subdivision. The property is currently undeveloped, and heavily wooded. This request is consistent with the land use plan. On June 22, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). On June 26, 2000, the City Council approved (6-0) first reading. A two lot plat for this property was also approved at that time. Please contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough if you have questions regarding this item. Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 480-347, 2°d Reading, ZA 00-040, Rezoning and Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase III. This property is located on Southlake Boulevard approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard, northeast of the Meadow Oaks subdivision. With the exception of a proposed carport, all structures on the site are existing. The zoning change has been requested in order to seek a specific use permit for the addition of a carport. The existing "C-2" zoning on the property would not permit the carport. In order to seek a rezoning in the corridor overlay zone, the applicant must present a site plan with any proposed improvements. The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 6 of 23 proposed carport is shown on the site plan, but the approval of the carport is subject SUP request, which is the next item on your agenda. On June 22, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) of the zoning. On June 26, 2000, the City Council approved (6-0) first reading. Please to contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough if you have questions regarding this item. Agenda Item No. 7D. Resolution No. 00-71, ZA 00-041, Specific Use Permit for a carport for Georgetown Park. This is the specific use permit request for a carport associated with the previous zoning and site plan request on your agenda. The purpose of this request is to consider granting a carport on this site in compliance with the SUP regulations of Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.12, as amended. Carports are not permitted in the existing "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Approval of this item is subject to the proposed "0-1" zoning change. On June 22, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). Please contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough if you have questions regarding this item. Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 480-343, 2°d Reading, ZA 00-047, Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition. This site is located off the northeast corner of W. Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The plan proposes a one-story 21,573 square feet city public safety facility and a future training facility. The facility will house fire and police services. The proposed zoning is for "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District and is limited to public safety facility uses only. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 7 of 23 The Director of Public Safety, Garland Wilson, has worked closely with the SPIN and Meyers Meadow residents in preparing the plans for the facility. There are no remaining resident issues. The Crime Control Board has also been involved with the plan and has approved the proposal. The only variances being requested are related to driveway spacing on Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The spacing issues are primarily due to existing driveways on the adjacent sites. The proposed driveways comply with stacking depths and spacing requirements from the intersections. You may also note that the north driveway intersecting Randol Mill Avenue is limited to DPS personnel only and would not be publicly accessed. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to the review, allowing driveway spacing as proposed. On June 20, 2000, the City Council approved (7-0) first reading on consent. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Garland Wilson, Bruce Payne (ext. 767) or Dennis Killough (ext. 787). Agenda Item No. 7F. Ordinance No. 480-344, 2`d Reading, ZA 00-048, Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition. This plan proposes "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District zoning and concept plan for an out parcel of the DPS west facility. The plan represents a general layout limited to the maximum 70% impervious coverage permitted under the "C-2" district regulations. The intent behind this request is to recoup some of the cost of the DPS west facility land purchase. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 8 of 23 There are no apparent resident issues related to this request, there are no variances requested and there are no remaining comments to address in the plan review. You may note that driveway access to this property is dependent upon the public access driveways located on the DPS west facility. On June 8, 2000 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-1) subject to the review. Commissioner Muller dissented stating that she would like this site to be reserved as open space. On June 20, 2000, the City Council approved (7-0) first reading on consent. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Garland Wilson, Bruce Payne, or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7G. Ordinance No. 480-345, 2°d Reading, ZA 00-064, Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park. The proposed zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan district with "CS" Community Service district to include limited outside storage. The primary purpose behind this request is to address outside vending machines related to the Coca- Cola vending contract and new lighting for baseball fields. The lighting for the fields exceed the maximum intensity and glare permitted under the lighting ordinance. A review from the building department is included in your packet. The vending machines are proposed to be outside rather than within a building. An exhibit showing the proposed locations and a screening exhibit are included in your packet. A secondary reason for the request is to change zoning on recently acquired properties and address existing uses and facilities on the site. With the exception of the proposed new lighting and the vending machines, all other uses and structures are existing. There were no issues raised by residents during the Commission's hearing on this issue. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 9 of 23 On June 8, 2000 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, modified as follows: • Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; • Delete Item #3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping) for existing improvements only; • Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards) for existing improvements only. The Commission felt the vending machines should comply with the outside storage regulations and did not allow the requested variance. Commissioner King dissented feeling that the vending machines should be allowed as proposed. On June 20, 2000, the City Council approved (6-1) first reading with Standerfer dissenting. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Kevin Hugman, Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 00-060, Site Plan for a portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Campus. This request is for a proposed detention pond on a portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus located on the northwestern portion of the development. The pond and proposed improvements are being incorporated within the open space/recreational areas, north of the first office building and garage structure being constructed on the site. A proposed trail encompasses the pond. The revised site plan is required to extend the area of construction beyond what was originally proposed in the first approved site plan. The applicant has provided detailed information about the purpose and development of the pond and associated improvements. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 10 of 23 If you have any questions regarding this item, please,contact Lisa Sudbury. Agenda Item No. 7I. Ordinance No. 646-B, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, revising the number of board members and length of terms. As requested by City Council, this ordinance reduces the number of members on the Parks and Recreation Board from nine to seven, and changes the length of term from three years to two. There have been no changes to the ordinance since Council approval on first reading. If you have any questions, please contact Sandy LeGrand or Kevin Hugman. FYI, at its July 10, 2000, meeting the Park Board unanimously elected Chris Miltenberger as vice- chair to replace Dick Anderson, whose term expired this year. Sherry Berman is the board chair and Cara White is the board secretary. Agenda Item No. 7J. Ordinance No. 787, 2nd Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. The City was required to relocate water and sewer lines for the reconstruction of SH 114. The water and sewer lines along the south side of SH 114 were relocated within a utility easement across several properties. Most of these properties make up Gateway Plaza Phase II. The developer of Gateway Plaza distributed the easements to the property owners. Apparently, a property owner of one of the tracts in Gateway Plaza Phase II inadvertently signed an easement document for a piece of property he did not own. The easement document was recorded with Tarrant County. Although the easement is null and invalid because the rightful owner did not execute the document, the easement must be abandoned to clear the title to the property. The rightful owner is in the process of executing the correct document for the easement. The first reading of this ordinance was approved at the June 20, 2000, Regular City Council Meeting. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 7K. Ordinance No. 756-A, 2nd Reading, Revisions to the FY 99-00 Budget. Ordinance No. 756-A is presented to the Council to reflect the proposed mid-year changes to the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 11 of 23 Adopted FY 1999-2000 Budget. There are only 3 divisions proposing an increase as outlined in Sharen's memo, however, in total the proposed FY 1999-2000 budget reflects a decrease in revenues and expenditures of$134,853 and $630,965, respectively. It is anticipated that fund integrity will be maintained, as the expenditure adjustments reflect the general fund balance at 15.3 %. This is within the adopted Fund Balance Policy, which states a minimum balance of 15% and an optimum balance of 25%. Sharen has attached a detail listing of reductions by department as requested by Council at the 1st reading of Ordinance No. 756-A. If you have any questions please contact Sharen Elam. Agenda Item No. 7L. Ordinance No. 784, 2"d Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 601 was passed amending article 102.0172 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to create a Municipal Court Technology Fund by which a defendant would be required to pay a $4 fee if convicted of a Class C Misdemeanor offense. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for municipal court. Refer to the memo prepared by Sean Leonard for examples of technological enhancements. Based on the current trend of citation issuance, it is estimated that collection of this fund could result in $150,000 to $200,000 in revenue to the City before this article expires in Sept. 1, 2005. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. Agenda Item No. 7M. Ordinance No. 785, 2nd Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 163 was passed amending article 102.011(a)(2) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to increase the fee for executing an arrest warrant from $35 to $50 per apprehension. The approval and implementation of this fee could result in the collection of an estimated $15,000 to $45,000 per year in additional revenue to the City that would be deposited in the General Fund to help cover operating costs (i.e. warrant officers, court personnel, etc.). For clarification purposes only, during the June 20, 2000, City Council meeting, a Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 12 of 23 question was raised regarding the refunding of this fee to persons who are acquitted of their charge(s). Court Administrator Sean Leonard would like to clarify that while the current standard practice of the Southlake Municipal Court is to refund the warrant fee upon acquittal, it must be understood that it is completely up to the discretion of the seated Municipal Judge at the time of trial as to whether or not this fee is imposed or refunded. Therefore, an acquittal does not automatically "guarantee" a refund of the warrant fee. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. Agenda Item No. 7N. Resolution No. 00-75, ZA 00-052, Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station, Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition. This is an existing Texaco Service Station located at the northeast corner of Kimball and S.H. 114. The purpose of this request is to add two fuel pumps and a car wash to the site and bring the site into compliance with current regulations. The existing building is to remain "as is" with the exception of cosmetic exterior changes. This plan also proposes closure and relocation of driveways on the site. There is a residential dwelling located directly north of the property which will be sharing the proposed north driveway entrance. The commission had concerns on how the existing residential drive would tie into the proposed commercial drive. This issue has been addressed on the plan before you. It should be noted that although this property to the north has a residential structure on it, it is not zoned for residential use and is not designated for residential on the city land use plan. It should also be noted that the owner of the adjacent north property granted an access easement to the Texaco owner's for the commercial driveway. The plan sent to the commission showed no pass through lane for the pump island area. The staff review recommended that one be provided. To accommodate this issue the commission allowed a reduction in the required 25' bufferyard along S.H.114 to make room for a pass through lane. The plan before you reflects this change. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 13 of 23 The only other variance requested on the property is for the required 8' screening along the north property line. The adjacent property owner has submitted a letter included in your packet stating that they do not desire the screening. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, to delete Item #1 (8' screening device); to show a pass through lane with a possible variance for that request; and to include the Tree Preservation Analysis. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 70. Resolution No. 00-76, ZA 00-080, Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer, Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition. This SUP request is for the same Texaco site noted in the previous agenda item. A portion of this lot has an existing SUP for alcoholic beverage sales for off-premise consumption. However, with recent platting of the property, the boundary has changed and no longer matches the original SUP boundary. The sole purpose of this request is to address this change. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Karen Gandy. Agenda Item No. 7P. Resolution No. 00-77, ZA 00-081, Specific Use Permit for outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition. This request is for the same Texaco site noted in the previous agenda items. The purpose of this request is to consider outside storage of propane tanks. The plan proposes the tanks to be on the north side of the convenience store toward the west end. They are enclosed behind an eight-foot masonry wall. There are no ordinance-related issues Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 14 of 23 regarding the outside storage proposal. Since this is the same plan associated with the gas station SUP, this motion should include any conditions of that approval along with any that are specific to the outside storage request. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, and to delete Item ##1 (8' screening device); and to restrict the outside storage to 25 - 5 gallon propane tanks screened in the manner shown on the Site Plan. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7Q. Resolution No. 00-78, ZA 00-069, Specific Use Permit for Lighthouse Community Church. This request is for Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, located on Greenwood Drive within an industrial business park. The building is currently under construction. A church desires to occupy a lease space in the building. The current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. The land use category is Industrial. The "I-1" district permits churches with a Specific Use Permit approval. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0). If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7R. Resolution 00-79, ZA 00-078, Specific Use Permit for a shade structure for Mirage Car Wash at 955 North Davis Boulevard. The Mirage Car Wash is located on the east side of N. Davis Boulevard approximately 450' north of W. Continental Boulevard. The only change proposed to the site is the addition of the shade structure. The "Future Personal Services Shop" Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 15 of 23 shown on the plan was part of the original approval but has never been constructed. The property is subject to Corridor Overlay Regulations. The original site plan and specific use permit for Mirage Car Wash were recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, 6-0 on June 8, 1995, and by City Council, 6-0 on June 20, 1995. It should be noted that the approvals preceded the adoption of the Corridor Overlay Regulations. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The land use category is Industrial. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-3) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 24, 2000, and to delete Item #1 (masonry support columns) and to approve the S.U.P. for a period of one year. Commissioners Jones, Stansell, and Boutte dissenting. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7S. ZA 00-066, Site Plan for Southlake Chamber of Commerce, Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes. The request is for Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, located on Corporate Drive approximately 300' north of W. Southlake Boulevard and 400' east of N. Peytonville Avenue. The site plan proposes a 3,162 square foot one-story office building on a 0.458 acres lot for the Chamber of Commerce offices. The applicant is requesting a variance to the required "on-site" dumpster and driveway stacking depth. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) allowing the requested variances. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 16 of 23 If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7T. ZA 00-025, Site Plan for Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner. This request is for Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner, involving 1.099 acres located at the southwest corner of Davis Boulevard and Southlake Boulevard. The request is for site plan approval of a one story, 7,145 square foot retail building. A concept plan for this site was approved September 3, 1996. The site plan before you substantially conforms to the previously approved concept plan. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The land use category is Retail Commercial. There are no requested variances on this plan. On July 6, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0), including parks requirements for the 8' sidewalk. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-332, 1" Reading, ZA 99-139, Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square. This property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 114 and Shady Lane and is the site of the "Gun Barrel" retail strip center. The plan proposes cosmetic changes to the exterior of the existing 11,000 square foot building with an addition of approximately 4,000 square feet of floor area on the north side of the existing structure. The following variances are requested: • Alternate bufferyard locations, widths and number plantings • Allowing parking spaces in the bufferyard • Reduced interior landscape area and plantings Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 17 of 23 • Allowing reductions in the driveway spacing and stacking requirements • Allowing a commercial driveway on Shady Lane (residential street) • Reduced building line setback on Shady Lane • Increased Impervious Coverage from 75% to 80% • Allowing exceptions to the articulation requirements • Placing the dumpster too close to residential property. The issues raised at P&Z included drainage concerns from neighboring property owners, multiple variances, and tree issues, noted in the Landscape Administrator's review. Following the P&Z meeting, the applicant obtained a Professional Engineer to evaluate the drainage and grading of the site. Please see memorandum from Charlie Thomas, City Engineer for details. This plan was revised from that submitted to the Commission by reducing the building square footage by 2000 sq. ft., increasing the bufferyards and reducing the parking. The applicant is seeking S-P-1 zoning due to the unique conditions of the property. The applicant also provided a list of uses, which may be eliminated from the allowed "C-3" uses. Please see the list provided with the site plan submittal in Attachment C. On March 9, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial (5-0). (Due to the Commission's recommendation for denial, an affirmative super majority vote by the City Council is needed to approve this request.) On March 21, 2000, the City Council approved (5-0) to table at the applicant's request to the April 4, 2000, meeting. On April 4, 2000, the City Council approved (6-0) on consent to table at the applicant's request to the June 6, 2000, meeting. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 18 of 23 On June 6, 2000, the City Council approved (6-0) on consent to table at the applicant's request to the July 18, 2000, meeting. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 00-80, Appointment of members to the Board of Directors for the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One. The Board of Directors consists of 12 members. The governing bodies of each of the taxing units participating in the TIRZ (Carroll Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County Junior College District, Tarrant County Hospital District) shall each appoint one member to the board. The Southlake City Council shall appoint eight members (including the formal appointment of the CISD representative) who, in accordance with Section 3.02 of the Charter, shall serve at the will and pleasure of the City Council. A member who is a member of the City Council shall cease to be a member of the TIRZ at the time he or she ceases to be a member of the City Council. Terms for eight positions on the Board expired May 2000. Attached to the memorandum is a copy of the current members of the TIF board for Council information. Agenda Item No. 10A. Review of progress and service levels of Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) and consideration of additional funding for FY 1999-2000. As mentioned to you previously, Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS), will come before you with an update of its progress and to request an additional $7,500 from the City. As you recall, at its April 4, 2000, meeting, the Council approved an initial $15,000 of the requested $22,500, and directed CARS to return in the fourth quarter with a progress report in order to consider further funding. A service summary report is included in your packet, and CARS chairman Dick Johnston will be at your meeting to provide you a report on their operation to date, future plans, and answer any questions you may have. Contact Kevin Hugman with any questions. Agenda Item No. 10B. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse located at 201 North Kimball Avenue. Lowe's Home Improvement Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 19 of 23 Warehouse is requesting a sign variance to allow larger letters on the primary sign. The proposed sign on the South elevation is set back more than 500 feet from Southlake Boulevard and is, therefore, limited to 42-inch letter heights. The requested sign has a 72-inch-high "L" on Lowe's. The sign contains only 195 square feet in area as compared to the 312 square feet permitted by ordinance. The Home Depot, Lowe's chief competitor, is located at 300 Village Center Drive and within sight of this store. On April 14, 1996, the City Council granted a variance to the Village Center development allowing six-foot tall letters on the Home Depot attached sign. A full front drawing of the building is included in your packet to reflect the impact of the maximum allowable size as compared to the requested size. Contact Malcolm Jackson with any questions. Agenda Item No. 10C. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Matarangi Ltd., located at 325 Miron Drive. The property owner at 325 Miron Drive constructed a monument sign in what appeared to be an appropriate location, respecting the landscaping; however, it did not meet the setback requirements. When the sign contractor was called to make the lettering for the sign, the violation was noticed. While this sign is set back from the curb, it is adjacent to the actual property line. Given the location of the monument sign off of a primary roadway frontage and the topography of the area, the sign poses no adverse visible impact. However, because the sign ordinance requires monument signs to be set back 15 feet from the property line, the appropriate course for relief for the property owner is to request a variance by the City Council. Contact Malcolm Jackson with any questions. Agenda Item No. 11A. Ordinance No. 778, Noise/Nuisance and Ordinance No. 480-KK amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Ordinance 435 was originally adopted in June 1988 as a "nuisance" ordinance to address noise-related complaints. During the past several years, the city responded to several noise complaint situations and both police services and code enforcement experienced some difficulty in resolving the complaints for several reasons under the existing ordinance. The existing ordinance also relies heavily on subjective judgement that mandates a much greater degree of evidentiary support than can typically be achieved for successful prosecution. The Public Safety Department conducted extensive research, including contacting the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 20 of 23 Rutgers Noise Technical Assistance Center located in the Department of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers University, in the development of this ordinance. We incorporated both objective standards and subjective provisions within the ordinance to maximize the application and enforcement capabilities. The "heart" of the ordinance is the single paragraph in Section 11-61, (b). Everything else is designed to lend support or give specific direction and clarification and must not be taken out of context to that end. Malcolm Jackson will provide a presentation on the key points as we seek input from the City Council regarding this ordinance before preparing a draft for further consideration. Other Items of Interest Cable Franchise Transfer. You might have read in the newspaper last week that the proposed "swap" of customers between Charter Communications and AT&T Cable Services has been called off. This exchange, first announced in November, would have converted Southlake's cable subscribers from Charter to AT&T. We initially were told that a formal letter requesting approval of the transfer would be received by the end of January, but we later were told that negotiations were taking longer than expected. The companies announced the first week in July that negotiations had ended because the companies could not agree on an acceptable cost of the transfer. Based on that announcement, we now expect Charter to continue being the primary cable television provider to Southlake residents for the foreseeable future. If you have any questions, please call PIO James Kunke. Newsletter award. We were notified earlier this month by the City-County Communications and Marketing Association (3CMA) that Southlake In Review, our citywide newsletter, is a finalist for that group's national Savvy Award. That places our newsletter among the top three in the nation for cities with 34,000 residents or fewer. I believe that one major factor in our receiving this award is the new tabloid-sized, all-color format that was made possible with Council's approval in December of our current printing contract. We will find out at the 3CMA annual conference in September whether Southlake is the overall winner in our category. This is the third straight year that Southlake Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 21 of 23 has been a Savvy finalist, receiving awards each of the past two years for the Southlake Scene recreation catalog. There are many cities around the country with larger staffs and budgets that have never been a Savvy finalist, so to be recognized three straight years and in two different categories is a significant accomplishment. Southlake Sister Cities Youth Trip. A contingent of Southlake youth will leave for Toyoma, Japan, on Wednesday, July 19. Economic Development Specialist Stefanie Wagoner will accompany the 6 youth, ages 15-17, as the adult staff chaperone. While in Toyoma, the group will stay with host families and participate in a variety of cultural exchange opportunities. Plans include touring Toyoma and its new City Hall, nearby historic communities, visiting a Buddhist temple and attending cultural dance exhibitions. They will return to Southlake on Wednesday, July 26. Topics related to Economic Development. Be aware that the Restaurant Survey will be distributed to all residents via the citizen newsletter around August 1. Attached is a copy of the survey, newsletter blurb, and a draft news release for your information. Contact Greg Last or Stefanie Wagoner if you have any questions. John Eaglen Appointed as Assistant to the City Manager. As you may know, six internal candidates applied for the Assistant to position vacated by Shelli Siemer earlier this year. To objectively assess the candidates, an assessment center was organized by HR Director Lauren Safranek. Candidates were evaluated on a formal presentation, problem-solving exercise (citizen complaint), written communication and a formal interview. I was extremely pleased with the performance of all of our staff members; in fact, the decision was much more difficult than I had anticipated due to the talent of all of these individuals applying for the position. After much consideration and deliberation, Shana and I agreed that we would offer the position to John Eaglen, a young man who has worked for our city for 4 1/2 years, most recently as the Administrative Assistant in the Community Services Department. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 22 of 23 John has a bachelor degree from the University of Texas and recently received his Master of Public Administration degree from the University of North Texas. He is detail-oriented, has strong research and computer skills and, through his work with various boards and committees through Community Services, has a well-rounded understanding of the city, its residents, and the internal processes of the municipal organization. He also has a reputation of being a self-starter who works hard and shows strong dedication. On top of all of this, John is well liked, easy-going, and diplomatic. We think he will be a tremendous asset to our office and invite you to stop by to meet him. He can be reached at extension 806 or at jeaglen@cityofsouthlake.com. Also attached to my memo: ➢ Metroport Cities Partnership Meeting Agenda, July 20, 2000 @ City Hall ➢ Southlake Chamber of Commerce Upcoming Events ➢ PIO - July Calendar of Events ➢ Kudos ➢ AMS ➢ Calendar of Meetings / Events l BC Staff Extension Numbers: Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Eaglen, John, Assistant to the City Manager, ext. 806 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 18, 2000 Page 23 of 23 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, ext. 767 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Sudbury, Lisa, Planner, ext. 862 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: SPIN Standing Committee FROM: James Kunke, Public Information (ext. 819) SUBJECT: Special Meeting City Manager Billy Campbell has requested a special meeting of the SPIN Standing Committee so that city staff can present information on the planned reconstruction of FM 1938 (Randol Mill) between Southlake Boulevard and Highway 114. This is a complex project involving several cities, commercial interests, Tarrant County and TxDOT. It could have significant impact on traffic patterns throughout the city, especially Southlake Boulevard. When the issue came up several years ago, there was considerable resident concern. The intent is to hold one or two SPIN meetings the last week of this month so that residents are involved in the process and receive timely and pertinent information. Please make an effort to attend the special Standing Committee meeting or send a repre- sentative. Date: Wednesday, July 19 Time: 7:00 p.m. (will list about one hour) Place: Senior Activity Center V Draft#2: July 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. RESTAURANT SURVEY The City of Southlake, Department of Economic Development, is undertaking a citizen survey which is included in this newsletter. This "Restaurant Survey" is intended to provide valuable data by determining the current dining habits of Southlake residents as well as desirable new restaurants that might be enticed to come to the community. Difficulties currently faced in attracting restaurants to the City include the lack of conclusive demographic data and a limited day-time employment base from which restaurants need to draw customers. With this survey (and additional employment data), we intend to generate a report that will address these issues, thereby increasing our ability to identify and attract desirable restaurants to the City of Southlake. Pkase take a few minutes and fill out all items on the survey and return by the date noted. No postage is necessary. If you have any questions, feel free to contact the Department of Economic Development at (817) 481-5581, ext. 776 or E-mail at econdev@ci.southlake.tx.us. City of Southlake For information or comments: �r Department of Economic Development Department of Economic Development PH:(817)481-5581,ext.776 Southlake Restaurant Survey EM: econdev@ci.southlake.tx.us WEB:www.ci.southlake.tx.us Draft:7-12-00 10:00 a.m. Please respond thoroughly. This information will be used to attract restaurants to Southlake. 1.FREQUENCY Frequency in average days/wk On average, at what frequency does your family Avg.#of Avg.cost of (Circle answer) participate in the following? People bill 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Breakfast at a full service restaurant $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Breakfast at a fast food restaurant $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Lunch at full service restaurant $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Lunch at a fast food restaurant $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Evening dinner at a full service restaurant $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Evening dinner at a fast food restaurant $ 2. BUSINESS OR GROUP USES If adequate food and meeting services were available in Southlake,how many times/year would you hold the following? Frequency in times per year(check) Estimated Attendees(check) 0 1-5 6-10 11-15 15+ Type of event 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+ Business breakfast Business lunch Business dinner Personal meal gatherings 3.DINING DESIRES If all types of food service were available in Southlake,at what frequency would your family visit the following? Frequency(check) Frequency(check) Often Seldom Food Type Often Seldom Food Type American Mexican Barbecue Seafood Chinese Steakhouse Deli Thai Indian Specialty:(bagel, ice cream) Italian/Pizza Other: Japanese Other: 4. CURRENT AREAS OF ATTRACTION What areas of the D/FW Metroplex currently offer you the best choice of restaurants?(check all that apply) Sundance Square McKinney Ave Grapevine West End Greenville Knox Henderson Addison Comments? (Continued on back) 5. DEMOGRAPHICS Number of people in household(circle one) Number of at-home children in each age bracket 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+ (place number on line for each age group) Age of head of household(circle one) 0-4 years old 10-14 years old -35 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-55 55-59 60+ 5-9 year old 15-19 years old Annual household income(check one) Head of household education(check highest level completed) Less than$35,000 $75,000-$100,000 0-8 Years Associates Degree $35,000-$50,000 $100,000-$150,000 Some High School Bachelors Degree $50,000-$75,000 $150,000 or more High School Grad. Some Post-Graduate Some College Graduate Degree Head of household, state of birth? Please list areas other than Texas where you have lived Years as Southlake resident? years for years Years as DFW region resident? years for years for years 6.DESIRED RESTAURANTS or FOOD TYPES What restaurants or food types would you like to see in Southlake?(out-of-state preferences also) Restaurant Name or Food Type Existing Locations? General Comments: Fold on line,tape long edge,and RETURN BY MONDAY,AUGUST 14,2000,111111 — NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS IREPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMI AN°. 49 GRAPEVINE TEXAS J POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDR' Co CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DEPT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 667 N CARROLL AVE .y SOUTHLAKE TX 76092VS975 1I.1.1.111.If1.bill.iiI.IIii'.I.t.111. lii.I, II,.I A City of Southlake Public Information Office Du hFak. Release Date: July 31, 2000 t Contact: James Kunke (817) 481-5581, Ext. 819 Mayor: City of Southlake seeks residents' dining choices Rick Stacy Mayor Pro Tern: Southlake,the fastest growing city in Tarrant County during the 1990s as thousands of people Gary Fawks picked their new home, has become a popular new home for restaurants as well. Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: Southlake Town Square features a range of dining options, including the new Thai Chili that Ronnie Kendall opened this spring. Other new restaurants opening or building in Southlake during 2000 include Classic Cafe, Red Hot and Blue Barbecue, International House of Pancakes, and Chik-fil-A. Councilmembers: Another restaurant, Kirby's Steakhouse, recently received zoning approval to expand its dining Keith Shankland Rex Potter area. Greg Standerfer "Many of our residents build new homes with kitchens having all the conveniences, and then Patsy DuPre never use the kitchen,"joked Mayor Rick Stacy. "Families are so busy with day-to-day life that City Manager: eating out has become a way of life." Billy Campbell In an effort to attract desirable restaurant development within the city, the Economic Assistant City Manager: Development Department is conducting a citywide survey to collect information from residents on Shana K.Yelverton their dining-out habits and preferences.The survey is being distributed this week as an inset to the city's Southlake in Review newsletter,which is mailed to all Southlake households and businesses. Secretary: "Many of our residents have traveled extensively and lived in many places," said Director of ira L. LeGrand Economic Development Greg Last. "We would like to take advantage of their experiences and solicit recommendations for restaurants that would make a good fit in the city." The survey includes questions on current dining habits as well as desirable restaurants and food types. Also included will be questions regarding income and education levels, family size, and places of prior residency. "With this survey we intend to generate a report that will increase our ability to identify and attract desirable restaurants to the City of Southlake,"Last said. Increases in daytime employment within the city --highlighted by the Sabre corporate campus now under construction, Southlake Town Square, Gateway Plaza and Lowe's -- also will drive interest in restaurant development. "With the continued construction of State Highway 114 and increases in daytime employment, we expect to see continued interest from restaurants who want to serve our market," said City Manager Billy Campbell. For more information about the city's restaurant survey, please contact the Economic Development Department at(817)481-5581,ext.776,or by e-mail at econdev@ci.southlake.tx.us. Media contacts: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development (817) 481-5581, ext. 750 Or Stefanie Wagoner, Economic Development Specialist (817) 481-5581, ext. 776 1725 East Southlake Blvd. * Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 * fax (817) 329-1747 http://www.ci.southlake.tx.us ! ,, \ . JU32UIi\ 7771+V ES te,ANi,ur CITIES PARTNERSHIP AGENDA METROPORT CITIES PARTNERSHIP MEETING Thursday, July 20, 2000—7:30 a.m. 667 N. Carroll Avenue - City of Southlake- Council Chambers Southlake, Texas 1. Call the meeting to order 2. Welcoming comments—Mayor Rick Stacy 3. Approval of the minutes of June 15, 2000 meeting 4. Treasurer's Report- Clydene Johnson 5. Program—Eddie Haas, Engineer with Parsons Transportation Group will give a presentation concerning FM 1938. 6. Consider Resolution No. 2000-02 (attached) in support of FM 1938. 7. Transportation report 8. Selection of location for next meeting 9. Other Business 10. Adjourn Colleyville * Grapevine * Haslet * Keller * Roanoke* Southlake * Trophy Club * Westlake U//IULUUU IHIMC.o.0 I.uo MIV, rage a of t SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UPCOMING EVENTS RESERVATIONS are vital to the Chamber! THANK YOU! Joint Chamber Ribbon Cutting&Mixer for Berkey's Plumbing*Heating*Air Conditioning and Grapevine National Mortgage Investments/Mortgage Link at Stacy Furniture has been CANCELLED until a later date. Second Quarter New Member Reception - All Chamber Members are invited to attend our Second Quarter New Member Reception! From 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM on Thursday, July 20, 2000. Sponsored& Hosted by Danny Mayer of Grubbs Infiniti, 1661 W. Airport Freeway(located on the south side of Airport Freeway between H sy 157 and Central/Murphy Dr. exit),Euless, 817-318-1200. Help us greet all the new Chamber members and become reacquainted with existing members. Please contact the Chamber to make reservations at 817-481-8200. (This is a FREE networking opportunity!) July Luncheon-Join us at 11:30 AM on Monday, July 24, 2000,at the Marriott Solana Hotel to hear an Economic Development Update on Southlake provided by Greg Last,Director of Economic Development Director,lunch will be sponsored by Grubbs Infiniti. Please make reservations by Thursday, July 20,2000. Announcing the 2000-2001 publication of the Southiake Chamber of Commerce Business&Community Directory!!! The Southlake Chamber of Commerce is proud to announce that the 2000-2001 Business & Community Directory isnow available for publication, information and sales. Melissa McSpadden, Sales Representative of Global Publishing,Inc.,has been selected as our official advertising sales representative and publisher. Global Publishing,Inc. offers 25 years of experience in the publication business. Our business and community directory is a free service to our chamber members. This quality publication will showcase our community,provide important community information, and list our members alphabetically -- and by business classification. These directories will be distributed to all Southlake residents and potential residents,newcomers,realtors,hotels, banks,city offices, chamber members,and schools. Advertising sales are presently underway for our members. Contact Melissa McSpadden,Global Publishing Inc.,at(817)831-2631;or the chamber office at (817)481-8200,for additional information. Joint Chamber Mixer-Colleyville,1 B,Keller,Northeast Tarrant,Roanoke/Trophy Club/Viestlake, & Southlake Chambers of Commerce. Featuring Harley Night at The Speedway Club at Texas Motor Speedway. Dress up in your best "Harley" clothes and join us for hors d'oeuvres, cash bar,tours of the club, and Legends races! From 6:00 PM to 9:30 PM on Thursday, August 10, 2000. Free for Chamber Members! Please RSVP to the Chamber at 817-481-8200. Joint Chamber Ribbon Cutting&Mixer-Join international Wealth Management at 1340 S. Main Street(First Bldg.Next to First State Bank off of Main St.) rapevine,817-410-1188. Mixer is 4:30 PM to 6:30 PM and Ribbon Cutting at 5:15 PM on Tuesday,August 29, 2000. Please RSVP to the hamber at 817-481-8200. Register Now for Leadership Southiake -Enrollment for the Southlake Chamber of Commerce 2000-2001 Leadership Southlake class is now open. The class will begin in September. The Leadership Southlake program is designed to identify and motivate leaders, and to acquaint them with the opportunities,realities,and challenges of their community. This 7-month program offers an excellent way to learn all about the greater Southlake area. Session formats vary, and include lively panel discussions,management and leadership training exercises,speakers,group interaction,and individual participation.Topics include the history of Southlake,town government,community service,county and state government,public education,and economic development. Tuition for Leadership Southlake is $250,and covers expenses for the Ro-,es course,meals, notebooks and hand-out materials. Contact the chamber office at 817-481-8200 for enrollment. Please provide us with your e-mail and your web site addresses, so that we may add you to our web site,just another Chamber member benefit: E-Afail.- Web Site: IF YOU HAVE NOT RSVP'ED FOR THE ABOVE EVENTS OR IF YOU NEED MORE INFORMATION,PLEASE COMPLETE AND FAX TO 817-329-7497 OR CALL(817)481-8200. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Name: Company: Phone Number: Additional Names:2. ,3. ,4. 717/0 ova v City of Southlake Public Information Office DUthlContact: L. James Kunke ac' (817) 481 5581, Ext. 819 July Calendar of Events - Cont. Wednesday,June 28 Mayor: Rick Stacy July 18—DARE Polar Ice Night,6:30-9 p.m., Polar Ice skating rink.Cost is$7 per person and includes Mayor Pro Tem: skate rental. Phone:(817)481-2250. Gary Fawks Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: July 18— Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Sing-A-Long, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Ronnie Kendall Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. Councilmembers: July 20— Movies in the Park, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park. This free weekly series of family movies will Keith Shankland Rex Potter feature Stuart Little,preceded by children's activities in the park.Phone:(817)481-5581, ext. 756. Greg Standerfer Patsy DuPre July 20— Seniors"Beat The Heat"luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood City Manager Drive.This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 am.and includes the Billy Campbell monthly book discussion at noon. Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m.Phone:(817)481-2776. Assistant City Manager: July 22—DV8 concert,7 p.m., Southlake Town Square.This is a free public performance. Phone:(817) na K.Yelverton 329-5566. Secretary: Sandra L.LeGrand July 24 — Southlake Chamber of Commerce luncheon, 11:30 a.m., Marriott Solana Speaker will be Southlake Director of Economic Development Greg Last. Phone: (817)481-8200. July 25 — Southlake Seniors Luncheon and Crafts, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive.All seniors are invited to this weekly luncheon.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 25 — DARE Skatetown Night,6:30-8:30 p.m., Skatetown skating rink. Cost is $4 per person and includes skate rental.Phone:(817)481-2250. July 27 — Movies in the Park, 8 p.m., Bicentennial Park. This free weekly series of family movies will feature Charlotte's Web,preceded by children's activities in the park. Phone: (817)481-5581,ext.756. July 27 — Seniors"Beat The Heat"luncheon, 10 a.m.to 1 p.m., Senior Activity Center, 307 Parkwood Drive. This new weekly activity will start with table games and salad luncheon at 10 a.m.and includes an Alaska travel video showing and ice cream sundaes at 12:30 p.m.Watercolor art classes will follow at 1 p.m. Phone: (817)481-2776. July 28—Friday Fun Night,6 p.m., Senior Activity Center,307 Parkwood Drive.Seniors are invited to this evening of table games,a movie and refreshments.Phone:(817)481-2776. July 29—Sizzlin Summer Skate Nite,7:30-9:30 p.m.,Bicentennial Park in-line hockey rink.Families are invited to enjoy this free evening of skating and music.Younger skaters will be required to wear helmets. Concessions will be sold. Phone: (817)481-5581,ext.758. July 29—Pontiac Car Club show,3-7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square. Phone: (817)329-5566. July 29—Lost Cause concert,7 p.m.,Southlake Town Square.This is a free public performance of rock music. Phone:(817)329-5566. 1725 East Southlake Blvd. * Southlake, Texas 76092 (R171 4R1-R 5 1 * fay (R171 ' 9Q-17A7 R Pamela Orr 3301 North White Chapel Southlake, Tx 76092 Home Phone(817)491-2549 July 02, 2000 Southlake Police Department 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Tx 76092 Dear Chief of Police, A I would like to take this moment to thank your department and one of your officers for going the extra mile. I live at Camp Bumett(3301 N. White Chapel). My husband is a police officer with the city of Grapevine he works strange hours and is sometimes called out late and can lead into long hours. Living at Camp Burnett can be a scary place when I'm alone. Tonight at about 8:45 Officer Ric Salas stopped by to check to see if everything was ok out at Camp Burnett. For me that was so refreshing that he went out of his way to check, because our driveway is about 1/4 of a mile long so he went the extra step to ensure my security. This is very comforting because starting July 9 my husband will be gone for 3 weeks on a police motorcycle instructor school in Illinois. Thanks Again Sincerely, >‘)//711-14 Pamela Orr / a e/ • L • od-\lic,- (_- 1 -Tlii-L 1\ /[,0-r._, - h-kee- Su 9C:ljaki CIY\- Ttz_Q_ b,-,J3 qa r s, LIG') (_,-)u_Lo ceu:i_ (J t ' • ek.).LAr\cl (2, . &\r-yllo ,v _ A . JUL 112000 .s p;-7-.C2 Y CITY ail (2 14-- July 7, 2000 (' teA4A9l.J • Billy Campbell City Manager City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southiake,TX 76092 Mr. Campbell: We wanted to make you aware of the exemplary service we received from Ricky Robertson and Ryan York on July 3, 2000 at the Town Square fireworks celebration. We,along with our son, Matthew, arrived at the July 31'd celebration at approximately 8:00 p.m. Matthew has a neuromuscular disease and is in a motorized wheelchair. We could not find any parking at Town Square. Due to our son's condition our van has a wheelchair lift on it. Parking along 1709 was not a viable option for us. We stopped and explained this to Ricky Robertson and Ryan York. They quickly escorted us to a barricaded area where we could park and safely get our son out of the van. Due to Ricky Robertson and Ryan York's courteous and extraordinary efforts our son was abl;to enjoy the festivities. Sincerely, 1, the oda) Michael and DeAnn Swinton cc: Mayor Rick Stacy Ricky Robertson Ryan York Kim Bush From: BONCHAKRS@aol.com -t: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:06 PM jkunke@cityofsouthlake.com bcampbell@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Web Site James: The DMN,today, had the article on the City's award winning site. You deserve all the accolades possible for this accomplishment. I appreciate your efforts in making city information easily accessible to interested citizen-taxpayers. Bob Bonchak 1 AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 7/13/00 3:33 PM Council Meeting— August 1, 2000 City Council Meeting —August 15, 2000 Reports/Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: Minutes 1. Minutes Authorize the Mayor to enter into a prof servs agr w/JD Wilson and Assoc for development of a strategic plan-SKY 3. Approval of a prof sery agr for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improv to serve the Oak Hill Addn as part of a CDBG-SP 4. Approval of a prof sery agr w/Wiss,Janney.Elstner Assoc.Inc for engineering and design of street rehabilitation in Timberlake and Southview-SP 5. Amend Personnel policy manual to include Drug and Alcohol testing policy for CDL drivers-LS 6. Res. No._,Support of CARA bill-KH 7. Res.No.00-74, FM 1938-BC 2"d Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing& Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139, RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 1. Ord. #778, Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord. No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. ZA 00-053, Z,Tr 3H,T.M. Hood, Glover 2. Ord. #783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord. Relating to 3. ZA 00-043, SP,JIL Cutom Cabinets,Inc. 1.38 acres Municipal Court of Record-SL 3. ZA 00-056, ZCP,High Point, 14.654 acres,SF-lA to SF-20A 4. Bob Jones Concept Plan and Site Plan-KH • 5. ZA 00-073, SP, Consultants in Radiology,PA,6.608 acres **Pending P&Z Action **Pending P&Z action 1° Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord. No. 480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. Ord.#783,Amending Art II, Ch 8 of the Code of Ord.Relating to 1. ZA 00-068, RSP,Christian Men's Network,3.97 acres Municipal Court of Record-SL 2. ZA 00-024, RZ,2929 N.White Ch., SF-1A, 24.414 ac(P&Z tabled to 3. ZA 00-036,PP Simmons Addn July 20 4. ZA 00-056,ZCP,High Point, 14.654 acres, SF-lA to SF-20A 5. ZA 00-057,PP Worthing Addition,6.50 acres 6. ZA 00-070,PR Blk 24, Southlake Town Square,5.624 acres **Pending P&Z action 7. ZA 00-071,PR,Blk 3R,Southlake Town Square,5.234 acres 8. ZA 00-072,RPP,Blk 23, Southlake Town Square,3.518 acres **Pending P&Z Action Resolutions: Resolutions: 1. Res.No. , Resolution in support of SH 170 expansion-BP 1. Res. No. , Appoint to CCPD Board Consider: Consider: 1. Registration/fee policy for Parks&Rec programs-KH 2. Commercial developers agr for CISD No.6 Addition-CT 3. Award of Bid to for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements along N.Carroll(bid opening 7/13)-SP 4. Award of bid to_for the abandonment of the lift station at Dove Creek (bid opening 7/13)-SP Commercial developer's agr for Southlake Blvd.,Presbyterian Ch-CT Commercial developer's agr for Gateway Plaza Phase 2.Unit 1-CT Residential developer's agr for Crown Ridge Addn Phase IA& 1 B-CT Discuss: Discuss: Executive Session: Executive Session: A AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 7/13/00 3:33 PM City Council Meeting— September 5, 2000 City Council Meeting— September 19, 2000 Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: 1. Authorize IA w/CISD for natatorium—KH 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action 1st Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action Resolutions: Resolutions: Consider: Consider: Discussion: Discussion: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 7/13/00 3:33 PM Future City Council Meeting sent: 1. Fort Worth Water Contract-RH 2. Award bid on handrails Town Hall-RH 3. Auth Mayor to execute letter authorizing TxDOT to change speed limits in construction zone on SH 114-SP 4. Award of Bid to for the purchase of furniture for Town Hall"to the AMS under consider items for September 5,2000? 5. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Fina(S-7)-SP 6. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Explorer(S-7)-SP 7. Permission to advertise for bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Davis Blvd.and Continental-SP 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#760,ROW Use Management Ordinance-RH/SKY 2. Ord.483-I,Amendments to Sub Ord No.483,-Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements-CC/KH 3. Ord.No.774,Amendment to Trail System Master Plan-CC/KH Resolutions: 1. Res.99-16,relating to limiting#of zoning applications-from 3/23 CC mtg Consider: 1. Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 2. Prof Services Agreement-Michael Drive(PW-5/4/99) 3. Interlocal Agreement with Grapevine re: North Kimball-RH 4. Auth Mayor to enter into an IA w/NE Tarrant County Regional Water System(NETCRWS)-RH Discuss: 1. Land Conservatory District . 2. Utility Policies&Standards Ordinance 3. Street Standard Ordinance 4. 5/16/2000-Ord.759,False alarm Ordinance-GW/DuPre 5. Ord. _,Sign Ordinance-MJ 6. Ord.762,Adoption of Uniform Fire Code-RB 7. Ord.770,High Grass/Weeds-MJ 8. Ord.771,Nuisance Ordinance-MJ 9. Ord._,Abatement of Hazardous Buildings-MJ 10. "Amendment to Master Thoroughfare Plan-CC 11. :ecutive Session: J U I LA — July 2000 August 2000 T_ F S L-N(__ T F 5 2e1 31 1 2 3 4 5 27 TtL__. 5 6 7 8 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 28 2 23 24 2533 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 July 2v 9 20 21 2234 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3° 6 27 28 29 35 27 28 29 30 31 31 Monday,July 24; Thursday,July 27 11:30am 12:00pm Chamber Luncheon-GL Economic Dvlp update @ Solana 1 4:30pm 5:30pm TMB-Steering Committee @ Senior Center 6:00pm SPDC(City Hall) 7:00pm 9:00pm Friends of the Southlake Library @ Comm Ctr I Tuesday,July 25 Frida ,July 28 7:00pm 8:00pm Library Foundation meeting (Senior Activity Center) City Manager Budget Filed-Budget Video distributed to Council 1 Wednesday,July 26 _ Saturday,July 29 7:00pm 8:00pm Library Board meeting (City Hall) . Sunday,July 30 Meetings Events 3 7/14/00 u' July 20T August 2000 T ud_—_T__F 5 .�N T -F 5_._ 26 1 31 1 2 3 4 5 v 2 137 4 5 6 7 B 3z 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' �� ze 9 10 it 12 13 14 215 2 33 13 14 12 13 24 18 19 329 1 36 31 18 19 20 21 22 33 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 35 27 28 29 30 31 31 I30 31 Monday,July 17 Thursday,July 20 7:30am 8:30am Metroport hosted by City ofSouthlake @ City Hall 5:00pm 5:30pm Chamber New Member Reception @ Grubbs Infiniti 6:30pm P&Z Meeting(City Hall) Tuesday_,-July 18 Friday,July 21 7:00pm City Council Meeting(City Hall) Wednesda ,Jul 19 _ --_ Saturday,July 22 6:00pm 8:00pm Town Hall Furniture Meeting(Tarrant County Sub-courthouse in Hurst) 7:00pm Special SPIN Standing Committee Meeting (Senior Center) Sunday,July 23 . Meetings Even`- 7/14/00 • City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: July 18,2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers in City Hall WORK SESSION: 5:30 to 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M. or Immediately Following the Work Session AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.086. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held, under these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. 1. Section 551.071 Consultation with Attorney a. Seek advice from attorney regarding pavement distress issues. b. Seek advice from attorney regarding Pioneer Concrete of Texas,Inc. 2. Section 551.072 Deliberation Regarding Real Property a. Land acquisition for entry portal. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 3. INVOCATION: Chaplain of the Month,Reverend Scott Berry, First Baptist Church of Southlake 4. REPORTS: A. Mayor's Report B. City Manager's Report C. SPIN Report D. Parks and Recreation Board Report City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18, 2000 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consent: A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held June 20, 2000 and Special City Council meeting of June 26, 2000. B. Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the Employee Handbook, to include Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy. C. This item intentionally left blank D. Award of bid for handrails at Town Hall located in Town Square. E. Resolution No. 00-73, Amending the current tax abatement agreement among the City of Southlake, Texas, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1, and Sabre, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; authorizing its execution by the Mayor; and providing an effective date. F. Approval of Change Order No. 2 for work at Town Hall. G. Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer agreement for Gateway Plaza, Phase 2,Unit 1. H. Ordinance No. 480-348, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-053), Rezoning of Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, being approximately 2.86 acres, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District.Public Hearing set for August 1, 2000. I. ZA 00-54, Plat Showing, Lot 17, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum 7. Ordinances, second readings,public hearings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-342, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18, 2000 Page 3 R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. Location: West side of South Peytonville Avenue approximately 300' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Applicant: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood #16. PUBLIC HEARING. B. Ordinance No. 480-346, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-037), Rezoning on property legally described as Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Location: North side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. SPIN Neighborhood #15. PUBLIC HEARING. C. Ordinance No. 480-347, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-040), Rezoning and Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase III, on property legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. Location: 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard being approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Owner and Applicant: Georgetown Monticello Partners,Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood#7. PUBLIC HEARING. D. Resolution No. 00-71, (ZA 00-041), Specific Use Permit for a carport for a non-residential property per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1(41) for Georgetown Park, at 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard, approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard,being approximately 1.554 acres. A revised site plan will be considered with this item. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Ordinance No. 480-343, 2"d Reading, (ZA 00-047), Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18, 2000 Page 4 Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. PUBLIC HEARING. F. Ordinance No. 480-344, 2❑d Reading, (ZA 00-048), Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; being approximately 0.822 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. G. Ordinance No. 480-345, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-064), Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park, on property legally described as Lot 2R2, 'L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. PUBLIC HEARING. H. ZA 00-060, Site Plan for a portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Campus on portions of Tracts 2A2 and 2A7, U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, and being approximately 25.6 acres. The current zoning is "NR- PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2" Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies, training and conference centers, parking structures, heliport/stop and verti-port/stop,hotel, restaurant,retail and office uses. PUBLIC HEARING. I. Ordinance No. 646-B, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and length of terms. PUBLIC HEARING. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18,2000 Page 5 J. Ordinance No. 787, 2nd Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. PUBLIC HEARING. K. Ordinance No. 756-A, 2nd Reading, Revisions to the FY 99-00 Budget. PUBLIC HEARING. L. Ordinance No. 784, 2nd Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. PUBLIC HEARING. M. Ordinance No. 785, 2nd Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. PUBLIC HEARING. N. Resolution No. 00-75, (ZA 00-052), Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station with a convenience store and a car wash on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. O. Resolution No. 00-76, (ZA 00-080), Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. P. Resolution No. 00-77, (ZA 00-081), Specific Use Permit for outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition (Texaco), being approximately 0.918 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. Q. Resolution No. 00-78, (ZA 00-069), Specific Use Permit for a church (Lighthouse Community Church) on Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, being approximately 1.085 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. PUBLIC HEARING. R. Resolution 00-79, (ZA 00-078), Specific Use Permit for a shade structure for Mirage Car Wash located at 955 North Davis Boulevard, being City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18,2000 Page 6 approximately 2.00 acres. A site plan will be considered with this request. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. S. ZA 00-066, Site Plan for Southlake Chamber of Commerce, on Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, being approximately 0.458 acres. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. T. ZA 00-025, Site Plan for Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner, being approximately 1.099 acres. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-332, lst Reading, (ZA 99-139), Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square, on property legally described as Tract 1B3 situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, and being approximately 1.4677 acres. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 114 and Shady Lane. Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Owner and Applicant: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #6. Public Hearing set for August 1, 2000. 9. Resolutions: A. Resolution No. 00-80, Appointment of members to the Board of Directors for the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One. 10. Other items for consideration: A. Review of progress and service levels of Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS), and consideration of additional funding for Fiscal year 1999- 2000. B. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse located at 201 North Kimball Avenue. C. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Matarangi Ltd. Located at 325 Miron Drive. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18,2000 Page 7 11. Other items for discussion: A. Ordinance No. 778, Noise Ordinance and Ordinance No. 480-KK, Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, regarding noise regulations in Ordinance No. 480 to remove any conflict with the provisions of Ordinance No. 778. 12. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, July 14, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Chapter 551. �� ►u;i# Government Code, ` ®vTHC44. Aka& 4.114.444U181 :Ag Sandra L. LeGrand E�i x: City Secretary 0 .... ........ •j Q\ If you plan to attend this public meeNgerun'totesa disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581, extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda July 18, 2000 Page 8 EXECUTIVE SESSION SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and contemplated litigations, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Carroll/1709 LTD. vs. The Board of Adjustments of the City of Southlake. October 1999. SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City. SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. SECTION 551.086 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS The City Council may deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. A FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING MAY ONLY BE MADE IN OPEN SESSION. City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 20, 2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. EXECUTIVE SESSION: If a need arises to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. 1. Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, the Commission may meet in executive session to consult with the City Attorney regarding matters authorized by Section 551.071, including matters posted on this agenda. 2. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on July 6, 2000. 3. Administrative Comments. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of item unless a Commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 4. Consent: ZA 00-075, FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL I.S.D. NO. 5 ADDITION, on Tract 1A4, J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, involving16.081 acres. Location: On the north side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 400' west of South Carroll Avenue. SPIN Neighborhood #8. Approval subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 14, 2000. REGULAR AGENDA: 5. Consider: ZA00-024, REZONING on Tracts 3 & 3F, Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, involving 24.414 acres, from "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P- 2" Generalized Site Plan District for tropical fish distribution and related City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 20,2000 PAGE 2 ancillary uses to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Location: 2929 North White Chapel Boulevard being on the east side of North White Chapel Boulevard approximately 700'north of Sweet Street. SPIN Neighborhood#2. Public Hearing. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO BE TABLED AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE AUGUST 3, 2000, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. 6. Consider: ZA00-068, REVISED SITE PLAN FOR CHRISTIAN MEN'S NETWORK on Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, involving 3.970 acres. Current Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. Location: 251 Countryside Court. SPIN Neighborhood#11. Public Hearing. TABLED TO AUGUST 3, 2000, UNDER PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 480, SECTION 40.2. 7. Consider: ZA00-073, SITE PLAN FOR CONSULTANTS IN RADIOLOGY, PA, on a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Gorbutt Addition, involving 6.608 acres. Current 1111 Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses and the "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District use of ambulatory surgery, imaging center, and associated services. Location: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard approximately 550' west of Miron Drive. SPIN Neighborhood#8. Public Hearing. TABLED TO AUGUST 3, 2000, UNDER PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 480, SECTION 40.2. 8. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-KK, amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, regarding noise regulations in Ordinance No. 480 to remove any conflict with the provisions of Ordinance No. 778. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: Ordinance No. 778, amending Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake by adding Article III to define certain noises to be a nuisance and prohibit them. Public Hearing. 10. Consider: ZA00-036, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SIMMONS ADDITION on Lots 1 and 2, Simmons Addition, involving 20.713 acres. Current Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Location: On the south side of Brookwood • Lane approximately 180' east of Raintree Drive. SPIN Neighborhood#6. Public Hearing. City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 20,2000 PAGE 3 11. Consider: ZA00-043, SITE PLAN FOR J.I.L. CUSTOM CABINETS on Lot 2, Block A, North Davis Business Park, involving 1.38 acres. Current Zoning: "I-1" Light Industrial District. Location: On the northwest corner of North Davis Business Park on Greenwood Drive. SPIN Neighborhood#16. Public Hearing. 12. Consider: ZA00-056, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR HIGH POINT on Tracts 3A, 3A1B, 3A2, 3E, 3E1, and a portion of Tract 3A1C, Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract 686, involving 14.654 acres. Current Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Location: On the west side of Shady Oaks across from Love Henry Court. SPIN Neighborhood#13. Public Hearing. 13. Consider: ZA00-057, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WORTHING ADDITION on Tract 2C1, J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, involving 6.5043 acres. Location: On the south side of Rainbow Drive across from Sussex Court. SPIN Neighborhood#8. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: ZA00-070, PLAT REVISION FOR PROPOSED BLOCK 2R, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, on Block 2, Southlake Town Square, Phase 1, involving 5.624 acres. Location: On the northeast corner of North Carroll Avenue and Main Street. SPIN Neighborhood#8. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: ZA00-071, PLAT REVISION FOR PROPOSED BLOCK 3R, SOUTHLAKE • TOWN SQUARE, on Block 3 and Reserve Street, Southlake Town Square, Phase 1, and a portion of Tract 3, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, involving 5.640 acres. Location: On the north side of Civic Place across from Town Hall. SPIN Neighborhood#8. Public Hearing. 16. Consider: ZA00-072, REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PROPOSED LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 23, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, on a portion of Tract 2A, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, involving 3.518 acres. Location: On the north side of East Southlake Boulevard across from Miron Drive. SPIN Neighborhood#8. Public Hearing. 17. Discussion: Presentation of proposed Unified Development Ordinance. City of Southlake, Texas 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 20,2000 PAGE 4 18. Consider: Meeting Adjournment. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, July 14, 2000, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. /dtgete4t am= ay 1s� i Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary ...•••' �.�' If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581,extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. 1 REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING 2 COMMISSION MEETING 3 June 22, 2000 4 5 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Dennis King; Vice-Chairman Michael Boutte; 6 Commissioners Kenneth Horne, James Jones, Pamela Muller, Vernon Stansell, and John Terrell. 7 8 COMMISSION ABSENT: None 9 10 CITY STAFF PRESENT: Billy Campbell, City Manager; Bruce Payne, Director of Planning; Lisa 11 Sudbury, Current Planner; Mark Johnson, Current Planner; Angela Turner, Graduate Engineer; and 12 Tara Brooks, Planning Assistant. 13 14 Planner Lisa Sudbury explained that since the Chairman and Vice-Chairman were no longer on the 15 Commission, the Commission elected Commissioner King to open the meeting. Commissioner King 16 called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. 17 18 There was no Work Session held. 19 20 AGENDA ITEM #4, ELECTION OF A CHAIRMAN AND A VICE-CHAIRMAN: 21 Dennis King opened the floor for nominations for Chairman. 22 23 Commissioner Boutte nominated Commissioner King for Chairman. 24 25 Ayes: Boutte, Horne, Jones, King, Muller, Stansell, Terrell 26 Nays: None 27 Approved: 7-0 28 Motion carried. 29 30 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section # 0066) 31 32 Chairman King opened the floor for nominations for Vice-Chairman. 33 34 Commissioner Horne nominated Commissioner Boutte for Vice-Chairman. 35 36 Commissioner Boutte stated that he would be willing to accept the nomination, but that his house 37 is for sale, and if it sells he will no longer be on the Commission if it doesn't he will remain. 38 39 Commissioner Horne nominated Commissioner Muller for Vice-Chairman. 40 41 Commissioner Muller declined the nomination. 42 43 Commissioner Muller nominated Commissioner Horne for Vice-Chairman. 44 15 Commissioner Horne re-nominated Commissioner Boutte for Vice-Chairman. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 1 1 2 Ayes: Horne, Jones, Muller, Stansell, Terrell, King 3 Nays: None 4 Abstain: Boutte 5 Approved: 6-0-1 6 Motion carried. 7 8 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #0170) 9 10 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 11 Chairman King opened discussion of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting 12 held on June 8, 2000. 13 14 Motion was made to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held 15 on June 8, 2000, as presented. 16 17 Motion: Boutte 18 Second: Muller 19 Ayes: Jones, Muller, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, King 20 Nays: None 21 Abstain: Horne 22 Approved: 6-0-1 23 Motion carried. 24 25 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #0196) 26 27 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 28 Planner Lisa Sudbury stated that there would be an orientation for all the Commissioners. She stated 29 that Planning Department would call the Commission to find out the best times and to schedule it. 30 31 Chairman King called for a break at 6:40 p.m. 32 33 Chairman King called the meeting back to order at 6:42 p.m. 34 35 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA 00-061, REVISED SITE PLAN FOR KIRBY'S STEAKHOUSE: 36 Current Planner Mark Johnson presented this item to the Commission for a Revised Site Plan for 37 Kirby's Steakhouse on property legally described as Lot 9, Block A, Southlake Bank Place, an 38 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 39 A, Slides 4546 &4547, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.00 acres. 40 The property is located on the east of Bank Street, southwest of State Highway 114, and 41 approximately 400' south of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M.1709). The Current Zoning is "C-3" 42 General Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Retail Commercial. The Owner of the 43 property is Southlake Investments, L.L.C. The Applicant is Kirby's Steakhouse. Four (4) written 44 notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and no responses were 45 received. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 2 1 2 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked if they are only required one canopy tree because they are beyond 3 requirements in other areas. Ms. Sudbury stated since they are only adding 500' they are only 4 required one canopy tree and some groundcover. They have complied with the ground cover 5 requirements and are asking for a variance on the tree. 6 7 Richard Farrar, 445 East Walnut Street, Richardson, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. 8 9 Chairman King asked if they were initially approved for this elevation and did not finish the build 10 out. Mr. Farrar stated they built what they were approved. 11 12 Commissioner Jones asked what the new parking ratio will be. Mr. Farrar stated they are still in the 13 same ratio they were approved. 14 15 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked what was planted on the north side of the property. Mr. Farrar stated 16 that they have several crepe myrtles, yaupons, several oaks, and some that will be large shade trees. 17 18 Vice-Chairman Boutte stated that they do have more than the requirements for ornamental trees. Mr. 19 Farrar said they do. 20 21 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 22 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 23 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #0587) 25 26 Vice-Chairman Boutte stated that he did walk the property and agrees with the applicant that it 27 would be difficult to find a place for a canopy tree. 28 29 Chairman Muller said that she also looked that property, and there is not a place for another tree. She 30 said that the since they are only extending the articulation three feet, they are meeting the heart of 31 the ordinance. 32 33 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-061 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 34 16, 2000, granting relief on the additional canopy tree planting and the horizontal articulation on the 35 north wall. 36 37 Motion: Muller 38 Second: Horne 39 Ayes: Muller, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, Horne, Jones, King 40 Nays: None 41 Approved: 7-0 42 Motion carried. 43 44 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #671) 45 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 3 1 AGENDA ITEM#6, ZA 00-037, REZONING; 2 Current Planner Mark Johnson presented this item to the Commission for a Rezoning on property 3 legally described as Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and 4 being approximately 4.0 acres. The property is located on the north side of Johnson Road 5 approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. 6 The Requested Zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. The Land Use Category is 7 Low Density Residential. The Owners and Applicants are Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura 8 Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. Twenty-four (24) written notices were sent to property owners 9 within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received in favor. 10 11 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked if there was any other access to the property other than the access onto 12 Pearson. Ms. Sudbury stated that there is not. 13 14 Elizabeth Blessing presented this item to the Commission. 15 16 Commissioner Horne asked how safety equipment will access this property. Ms. Blessing stated that 17 they have met with the Fire Department and they do not seem to have any problem with the access. 18 She said they will have a turn around on the property, and the access will be built according to the 19 building code. 20 21 Commissioner Horne asked if they will be on sewer or septic. Ms. Blessing stated that there are no 22 utilities at this time, and they have not made a decision yet. 23 24 Commissioner Muller asked if there were other examples of access being so far from the property. 25 Ms. Sudbury stated that the lot to the south also has a narrow access, and there have been several 26 flag lot issues throughout the city. 27 28 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. 29 30 Rich Osman, 3200 Johnson Road, Southlake, Texas, wondered what kind of all weather road they 31 were planning for their driveway. 32 33 Ms. Sudbury stated that according to Fire Department standards require it support a 55,000 pound 34 vehicle. This can be done with asphalt or concrete, which is the applicant's choice. Commissioner 35 Muller asked if they could use gravel. Ms. Sudbury said if they have the right base, gravel was an 36 option. Commissioner Muller said to support the weight it would have to probably be a minimum 37 of asphalt. 38 39 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 40 41 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section # 1175) 42 43 Commissioner Muller stated she would be more comfortable if this was only one lot due to the 44 safety issues. 45 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 4 1 Ms. Sudbury said that the applicants have worked closely with staff and the Fire Department during 2 the application process, and they have come to a consensus that they can meet the requirements. 3 4 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-037. 5 6 Motion: Boutte 7 Second: Horne 8 Ayes: Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, Horne, Jones, Muller, King 9 Nays: None 10 Approved: 7-0 11 Motion carried. 12 13 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #1235) 14 15 AGENDA ITEM#7, ZA 00-038, PLAT SHOWING FOR LOTS 9 & 10, J.J. FRESHOUR NO. 521 16 ADDITION: 17 Current Planner Mark Johnson presented this item to the Commission for a Plat Showing for Lots 18 9 & 10, J. J. Freshour No. 521 Addition on property legally described as Tracts 4G 1 and 4H situated 19 in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. The property is 20 located on the north side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. The 21 Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential. 22 The Owners and Applicants are Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth 23 Blessing. Twenty-four(24)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200'notification 24 area, and two (2) responses were received with one (1) being in favor and one (1) undecided. 25 26 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked for clarification on Item # 2A. Ms. Sudbury said the subdivision 27 ordinance requires placement of the easement around the perimeter. The Tree Ordinance requires 28 that trees be removed from the easement; lately staff has been recommending where easements can 29 be placed outside of the tree line in order to save trees. 30 31 Elizabeth Blessing presented this item to the Commission. 32 33 Chairman King read a letter from Kathy Crisp about whether or not they are going to tear down her 34 fence. Ms. Blessing said that they have no plans to do so at this time. All of the fences appear to 35 be within the surveyed area. They are concerned that the Fire Department has the full 16' that is 36 required for the driveway. If there is not the full 16' they will ask the neighbors to stay within the 37 surveyed boundaries. 38 39 Commissioner Muller asked if any of the fences are encroaching. Ms. Blessing said that she is not 40 a surveyor but it appears that one might be and they will try to work it out with that owner. 41 42 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 43 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 44 45 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #1517) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 5 1 2 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-038 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 3 2000, allowing variances for Item #1 (minimum 100' lot width) and Item#2.a (easements around 4 perimeter of the property). 5 6 Motion: Muller 7 Second: Horne 8 Ayes: Terrell, Boutte, Horne, Jones, Muller, Stansell, King 9 Nays: None 10 Approved: 7-0 11 Motion carried. 12 13 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section#1558) 14 15 AGENDA ITEM#8,ZA 00-040,REZONING AND REVISED SITE PLAN FOR GEORGETOWN 16 PARK, PHASE III: 17 Current Planner Mark Johnson presented this item to the Commission for a Zoning Change and 18 Revised Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase III, on property legally described as Lot 1 R3, Block 19 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the 20 plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being 21 approximately 1.554 acres. The property is located at 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard being 22 approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard. The 23 Current Zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Requested Zoning is "0-1" Office 24 District. The Land Use Category is Retail Commercial. The Owner and Applicant is Georgetown 25 Monticello Partners, Ltd. Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' 26 notification area, and one (1) response was received in favor. 27 28 Commissioner Stansell asked if there is any requirement for the maintenance of the carport. Ms. 29 Sudbury said that they have to follow building codes and maintain safety, but there is nothing 30 specific about maintenance in the ordinance. 31 32 Chairman King asked what the height limitation on the building was. Ms. Sudbury said it is 35', 33 or two and one-half stories. 34 35 Commissioner Muller asked if there was a height limitation on the carport. Ms. Sudbury said that 36 the residential adjacency standards would require that the carport must be 40' from the property line 37 and a maximum of 20' in height. If they go over the 20' they would have to meet the 4:1 residential 38 proximity slope. Commissioner Muller asked about this carport. Ms. Sudbury said this carport does 39 not encroach on those regulations. 40 41 Commissioner Muller asked if they have to have masonry roofing materials that matches the office 42 building. Ms. Sudbury said that the detached carport must be made of the same materials as the 43 principle building. 44 15 Steve Isbell, (Realty Capital Corporation) 1111 S. Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, presented this Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 6 1 case to the Commission. 2 3 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 4 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 5 6 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #1802) 7 8 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-040 subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, 9 dated June 16, 2000. 10 11 Motion: Muller 12 Second: Stansell 13 Ayes: Boutte, Horne, Jones, Muller, Stansell, Terrell 14 Nays: None 15 Approved: 7-0 16 Motion carried. 17 18 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #1828) 19 20 AGENDA ITEM #9, ZA 00-041, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CARPORT FOR A NON- 21 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: 22 Current Planner Mark Johnson presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit for 23 a carport for a non-residential property per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (41) on property 24 legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, 25 Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, 26 Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. The property is located at 2485 E. 27 Southlake Boulevard being approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East 28 Southlake Boulevard. The Current Zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use 29 Category is Retail Commercial. The Owner and Applicant is Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. 30 Nine (9) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and one (1) 31 response was received in favor. 32 33 Commissioner Horne asked if there were any lighting requirements. Ms. Sudbury said that it would 34 have to meet the requirements of the lighting ordinance. 35 36 Steve Isbell(Realty Capital Corporation) 1111 S. Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, presented this case 37 to the Commission. 38 39 Commissioner Horne asked if they will have light from the building to the carport. Mr. Isbell said 40 they are not adding any lighting at this point. 41 42 Commissioner Jones asked if there were any plans to add another carport. Mr. Isbell said that they 43 are prevented from doing so by ordinance, and they only have a lease for a carport with one tenant 44 in the back building. 45 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 7 1 Commissioner Muller asked if the lighting was receded into the roof and would they have the same 2 requirements as gas stations. Ms. Sudbury said that they would have to meet the current lighting 3 ordinances. Commissioner Horne stated they show the lights being in the pitch of the roof and not 4 hanging down. Mr. Isbell said that was correct. 5 6 Commissioner Stansell asked if the location of the carport is dictated by the location of the tenant. 7 Mr. Isbell stated they looked for the least visible place to put it. 8 9 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. 10 11 Maura Hell stated that she was worried about the carports, but she thinks they have done the best 12 they can do. She said that there is ample lighting in the back. She can not see the carport from her 13 building. 14 15 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 16 17 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section#2351) 18 19 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-041 subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, 20 dated June 16, 2000, for Case No. ZA 00-040. 21 22 Motion: Muller 23 Second: Horne 24 Ayes: Horne, Jones, Muller, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, King 25 Nays: None 26 Approved: 7-0 27 Motion carried. 28 29 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #2476) 30 31 AGENDA ITEM #10, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 32 Chairman King adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. on June 22, 2000. 33 34 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-22-00, tape 1, section #2484) 35 36 37 38 48 41 Dennis King 42 Chairman 43 44 45 46 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 8 1 2 ATTEST: 3 4 5 8 Tara Brooks 9 Planning Assistant 10 11 N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MTG\MIN\2000\06-22-00.DOC Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 22, 2000 9 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING 2 COMMISSION MEETING 3 July 6, 2000 4 5 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Dennis King; Vice-Chairman Michael Boutte; 6 Commissioners Kenneth Horne, James Jones, Pamela Muller, Vernon Stansell, and John Terrell. 7 8 COMMISSION ABSENT: None 9 10 CITY STAFF PRESENT: Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney; Bruce Payne, Director of Planning; 11 Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Ken Baker, Comprehensive Planner; Charlie Thomas, City 12 Engineer; Angela Turner, Graduate Engineer; and Lori Farwell, Planning Secretary. 13 14 Chairman King called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. 15 16 There was no Work Session held. 17 18 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 19 Chairman King opened discussion of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting 20 held on June 22, 2000. 21 ?2 Motion was made to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held !3 on June 22, 2000, as presented. 24 25 Motion: Boutte 26 Second: Home 27 Ayes: Horne, Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, King 28 Nays: None 29 Approved: 6-0 30 Motion carried. 31 32 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #0044) 33 34 AGENDA ITEM#3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 35 Planner Ken Baker distributed the Planning Department C.D. to the Commissioners and offered to 36 demonstrate the C.D. to the new Commissioners at the end of the meeting. 37 38 Director of Planning Bruce Payne referenced an article in last Sunday's Fort Worth Star Telegram 39 regarding the City Council Retreat and a review of the City's ordinances. He said he will give the 40 Commission a full presentation about the proposed Unified Development Ordinance at the next 41 Commission meeting. 42 43 The Commission discussed possible dates and times for a new Commissioner orientation. Director 14 Payne informed the Commission that the orientation will most likely be sometime in August. The Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 1 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 Commission discussed having the orientation prior to a regularly scheduled meeting since they 2 would already have the evening set aside. 3 4 Commissioner Stansell arrived at 6:40 p.m. 5 6 Chairman King said Agenda Items #4 and #5 are on the Consent Agenda and will not have a 7 separate discussion unless a Commission member or a citizen requests for them to be removed from 8 the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda. No one requested for these items to be 9 removed from the Consent Agenda. 10 11 AGENDA ITEM#4, ZA00-076, FINAL PLAT OF GATEWAY PLAZA, PHASE II: 12 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA00-077, FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MCADAMS ADDITION: 13 Motion was made to approve ZA00-076 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 30, 14 2000, and ZA00-077 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated June 30, 2000. 15 16 Motion: Muller 17 Second: Terrell 18 Ayes: Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, King 19 Nays: None 20 Abstain: Stansell 21 Approved: 6-0-1 !2 Motion carried. '.3 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #0243) 25 26 AGENDA ITEM #6, ZA00-053, REZONING: 27 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for the rezoning of Tract 28 3H situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, involving 2.86 acres. There is an 29 existing 50' road easement serving this lot, and the developed residential lots to the south and west 30 of this tract. The property to the north and west of this tract are zoned "SF-lA". The current zoning 31 is "AG" Agricultural District and the requested zoning is "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential 32 District. The land use category is Low Density Residential. The owner and applicant is James E. 33 Glover. 34 35 James E. Glover presented this item to the Commission. He said there will be one single family 36 home of approximately 5,500 s.f. built on this site. 37 38 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. 39 40 Dennis Spickler, 926 Turnberry Lane, Southlake, Texas, said he is strongly and adamantly opposed 41 to any change in zoning. He said any increase in density is not good. He stated his concern about 42 the effect on the value of his property. 43 14 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 2 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 2 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #0892) 3 4 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-053. 5 6 Motion: Boutte 7 Second: Horne 8 Ayes: Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, Stansell, King 9 Nays: None 10 Approved: 7-0 11 Motion carried. 12 13 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #0948) 14 15 AGENDA ITEM#7,ZA 00-060, SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PROPOSED LOT 4,BLOCK 16 1, SABRE GROUP CAMPUS: 17 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Site Plan for a 18 portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus, on portions of Tracts 2A2 and 2A7, U. 19 P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, involving 25.6 acres. The current zoning is "NR-PUD" Non- 20 Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2" Office District uses and certain other 21 permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and 22 information technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and 23 verti-port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses. The land use category is Medium Density 24 Residential and 100-Year Flood Plain. The owner and applicant is The Sabre Group. 25 26 Mike Baker(Vice President of Corporate Services for The Sabre Group) presented this item to the 27 Commission. 28 29 Jim Riley (Brockette-Davis-Drake, Inc.) said the pond encompasses about two and a half acres of 30 disturbed area. He said the pond, fully filled, will cover about 50,000 s.f. of surface area and will 31 hold approximately 3.1 million gallons of water. 32 33 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 34 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 35 36 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #1320) 37 38 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-060 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 39 30, 2000. 40 41 Motion: Muller 42 Second: Stansell 43 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, Stansell, Terrell, King 44 Nays: None Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 3 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 Approved: 7-0 2 Motion carried. 3 4 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #1370) 5 6 Chairman King called for a break at 7:21 p.m. 7 Chairman King called the meeting back to order at 7:30 p.m. 8 9 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA00-025, SITE PLAN FOR LOT 5R4-R2, PARKER'S CORNER: 10 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a site plan of Lot 5R4- 11 R2, Parker's Corner, involving 1.099 acres. The property is located at the southwest corner of Davis 12 Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial 13 District. The land use category is Retail Commercial. The owner of the property is Drews Realty 14 Group and the applicant is Mike F. Twichell, L.P. 15 16 Commissioner Muller asked why there is a change to the width and depth of the existing drive. Staff 17 Engineer Angela Turner said the existing drive was not built to City standards so staff asked the 18 applicant to improve the situation. 19 20 John Drews, 580 Commerce Street, Southlake, Texas, presented this item to the Commission. 21 22 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked if Mr. Drews has a tenant. Mr. Drews said this will be a multi-tenant 7_3 building with Stanley Cleaners being the primary tenant. 24 25 Mr. Drews said it is mentioned in the review comments that the Parks Department wants him to put 26 in an 8' sidewalk on the Davis Boulevard side and said that is fine with him. 27 28 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 29 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 30 31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#1610) 32 33 Motion was made to approve ZA00-025 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 34 29, 2000, including the 8' sidewalk requirement. 35 36 Motion: Muller 37 Second: Horne 38 Ayes: Muller, Jones, Horne, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, King 39 Nays: None 40 Approved: 7-0 41 Motion carried. 42 43 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #1638) 14 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 4 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 AGENDA ITEM #9, ZA00-052, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GASOLINE SERVICE 2 STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE AND A CAR WASH: 3 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit 4 for an existing gasoline service station with a convenience store and a car wash on Lot 1, Block 1, 5 Emery Addition, involving 0.918 acres. The property is located at the northeast corner of State 6 Highway 114 and North Kimball Avenue. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. 7 The land use category is Retail Commercial. The owner of the property is Dalton Oil, Inc. The 8 applicant is CMPA, Inc. 9 10 Commissioner Home said there are currently many eighteen-wheeler trucks which come out of this 11 site onto Kimball Avenue and cause major traffic problems. He asked what can be done to stop the 12 trucks from coming out onto Kimball Avenue. City Engineer Charlie Thomas said with the 13 reconstruction of S.H. 114 by TxDOT the City has requested for them to extend the five lanes on 14 Kimball Avenue up through the north driveway to the Mobile Station across the street; there will 15 be four travel lanes and one turn lane at the intersection which should alleviate the problem they 16 currently have at that intersection. 17 18 Commissioner Horne said it would alleviate the problem if the trucks could take the south driveway 19 onto the S.H. 114 access road instead. He asked if they could make it so trucks could not go out on 20 Kimball Avenue and have to exit on S.H. 114. Mr. Thomas said there will be three lanes on the 21 frontage road to accommodate extra traffic such as that, but he does not know if there is anyway to -2 force the trucks out at that exit as far as this site plan goes. 3 24 Billy Williams (CMPA, Inc.) presented this case to the Commission. He said people probably park 25 their trucks there now because there is so much open space, but when they redo the parking lots, 26 driveways, and curbs, it will be a totally different place than it is today. 27 28 Chairman King asked if anyone is occupying the residence to the north of this station. Mr. Williams 29 said he did not know. 30 31 Chairman King asked if there has been any further discussion of a pass through lane for the pump 32 islands. Mr. Williams said they have not provided one. He said TxDOT is taking a portion of this 33 property where the old canopy and pumps were located so they lost two pumps. He said the original 34 intent was to just simply add two pumps in front to make up for the lost income, but it turned into 35 a complete revision of the entire site. He said there is not enough room to provide a pass through 36 lane. 37 38 Director Payne said they would have to go into the bufferyard to do that. 39 40 Mr. Williams said they would need a variance to move the canopy closer to the street and then they 41 could provide the pass through. 42 43 Commissioner Muller said she would feel more comfortable if they looked at putting in the pass 14 through lane. She said variances are allowed if there is a hardship and in this case a hardship has Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 5 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 been placed on this property because of the takings of the highway. She would suggest for them to 2 redraw the plans and take them to City Council showing the pass through lane. 3 4 Commissioner Terrell asked where the access will be for the house to the north. He asked how the 5 residents will get to their house once the new common access entrance is in place. Mr. Williams said 6 he suspects they will use the new driveway. He said the new driveway is on their property, and the 7 Texaco station just has an access easement through their property. He said they could show a curb 8 cut going to that property off of the new driveway. He said they also have an alternate access at the 9 northeast corner of this property. 10 11 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 12 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 13 14 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#2600) 15 16 Commissioner Horne questioned if they could put more curve in the Kimball Avenue drive to keep 17 trucks from using it. Director Payne said they cannot exceed the minimum radius requirements, and 18 the plan shows they are at the minimum now. 19 20 Director Payne said Officer Dunn told him that many of the trucks parking on this site are parking 21 there overnight. He said this site is not posted with a "No Parking" sign; if it were posted and a 22 complaint was made, the police could go and ticket the drivers. 23 24 Mike Dalton, 5904 Hunter Trail, Colleyville, Texas, said the trucks are one of the biggest things they 25 have been fighting over the years and now since they own the property, they will have a chance to 26 do something about it. He said truck traffic will be discouraged due to the way the site is proposed 27 to be laid out. He expects that any truck traffic will exit onto S.H. 114. 28 29 Commissioner Horne asked Mr. Dalton if it would help his traffic flow to have the 8' variance in 30 front for the pass through lane. Mr. Dalton said they would love to have the pass through because 31 they do not want their pumps blocked, but they were just trying to stay within the requirements. 32 33 Motion was made to approve ZA00-052 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 34 29, 2000, to delete Item #1 (8' screening device); to show a pass through lane with a possible 35 variance for that request; and to include the Tree Preservation Analysis. 36 37 Commissioner Muller also recommended that the City look at posting"No Parking" signs for trucks. 38 39 Motion: Muller 40 Second: Stansell 41 Ayes: Jones, Horne, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, Muller, King 42 Nays: None 43 Approved: 7-0 14 Motion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 2 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#3506) 3 4 AGENDA ITEM #10, ZA00-080, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED 5 BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION: 6 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit 7 for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, 8 involving 0.918 acres. The property is located at the northeast corner of State Highway 114 and 9 North Kimball Avenue. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. The land use 10 category is Retail Commercial. The owner of the property is Dalton Oil, Inc. The applicant is 11 CMPA, Inc. 12 13 Mike Dalton, 5904 Hunter Trail, Colleyville, Texas, presented this case to the Commission. 14 15 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 16 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 17 18 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #3616) 19 20 Motion was made to approve ZA00-080. 21 ?2 Motion: Muller ?3 Second: Terrell 24 Ayes: Horne, Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, King 25 Nays: None 26 Approved: 7-0 27 Motion carried. 28 29 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #3636) 30 31 AGENDA ITEM #11, ZA00-081, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE: 32 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit 33 for outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, involving 0.918 acres. The property is 34 located at the northeast corner of State Highway 114 and North Kimball Avenue. The current zoning 35 is "C-3" General Commercial District. The land use category is Retail Commercial. The owner of 36 the property is Dalton Oil, Inc. The applicant is CMPA, Inc. 37 38 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked if this request is only for storage of propane tanks. Mr. Dalton said yes. 39 40 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked if the new vending machine ordinance will cover this property now. 41 He said he was wondering about the ice machine on the property. Mr. Baker said yes; the ice 42 machine out front would need to be moved inside or screened before the deadline of 2001. 43 14 Mike Dalton, 5904 Hunter Trail, Colleyville, Texas, presented this case to the Commission. He said Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 7 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 the ice machine will be gone soon; it was supposed to be picked up a week ago. He said the new ice 2 machine will be inside in the back store room. 3 4 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 5 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 6 7 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #3780) 8 9 Vice-Chairman Boutte asked Mr. Dalton to describe the screening of the propane tanks. Billy 10 Williams (CMPA, Inc.) said there will be an offset gate that goes into an 8' high, all-masonry 11 enclosure. 12 13 Motion was made to approve ZA00-081 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 14 29, 2000, and to delete Item #1 (8' screening device); and to restrict the outside storage to 25 — 5 15 gallon propane tanks screened in the manner shown on the Site Plan. 16 17 Motion: Boutte 18 Second: Terrell 19 Ayes: Stansell, Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, King 20 Nays: None 21 Approved: 7-0 22 Motion carried. 23 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#4043) 25 26 AGENDA ITEM#12,ZA00-066, SITE PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: 27 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Site Plan for the 28 Southlake Chamber of Commerce on Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, involving 0.458 29 acres. The property is located on Corporate Drive approximately 300' north of West Southlake 30 Boulevard and 400' east of North Peytonville Avenue. The current zoning is "C-3" General 31 Commercial District. The land use category is Office Commercial. 32 33 Brad Cavnar (Chairman of the Southlake Chamber of Commerce) presented this case to the 34 Commission. 35 36 Commissioner Muller raised the question of whether or not they are providing enough parking 37 spaces. 38 39 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 40 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 41 42 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #4272) 43 44 Motion was made to approve ZA00-066 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 8 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 29, 2000, and to delete Items #1 (dumpster requirement) and#2 (stacking depth). 2 3 Motion: Muller 4 Second: Stansell 5 Ayes: Terrell, Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, Stansell, King 6 Nays: None 7 Approved: 7-0 8 Motion carried. 9 10 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#4453) 11 12 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA00-069, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH: 13 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit 14 for a church on Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, involving 1.085 acres. The property is 15 located at 2050 Greenwood Drive. The current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. The land use 16 category is Industrial. The owner of the property is SLJ Exchange, Ltd. The applicant is Lighthouse 17 Community Church. 18 19 Omar Rayas presented this case to the Commission. He said they have been in Southlake for six 20 years, first at Carroll Middle School and currently at Carroll Baptist Church. He said they will have 21 service on Sunday morning from 10:00 to 12:00 and a mid-week service from 7:30 to 9:00. 22 23 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. 24 25 William Swaford, 6436 Meadowlark Lane, Watauga, Texas, said he has been a member of this 26 church for six years and said they have been looking for a site for some time. He said this building 27 meets their needs, and it is the first step to having a building of their own. 28 29 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 30 31 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #4993) 32 33 Motion was made to approve ZA00-069. 34 35 Motion: Muller 36 Second: Horne 37 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, Jones, Horne, Stansell, Terrell, King 38 Nays: None 39 Approved: 7-0 40 Motion carried. 41 42 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #5072) 43 14 AGENDA ITEM #14, ZA00-078, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A SHADE STRUCTURE: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 9 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 Comprehensive Planner Ken Baker presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit 2 for a shade structure on Lot 2,T. J. Thompson No. 1502 Addition, involving 2.00 acres. The Mirage 3 Car Wash is located at 955 Davis Boulevard. The current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial 4 District. The land use category is Industrial. The owner of the property is Mirage Car Wash, Ltd. 5 The applicant is Dr. Gene E. White. 6 7 Brad White, 600 Meadow Lane, Roanoke, Texas, presented this case to the Commission. He said 8 they want to provide a safe environment for their employees. Over the past four years, they have 9 dealt with heat exhaustion and dehydration on a day-to-day basis, but their biggest fear is skin 10 cancer. He said they specifically like this type of structure with only two poles to provide fewer door 11 dings to the cars they are working on. He said they would also like to have a membrane roof 12 structure because during the winter months, there is still some sunlight able to penetrate through 13 which prevents them from having to close down due to water freezing on the ground and someone 14 slipping. 15 16 Commissioner Stansell asked Mr. White if he has ever contemplated adding a masonry flashing or 17 facing on the posts to make them more substantial. Mr. White said they can do that, but they are just 18 trying to create the smallest area possible to prevent door dings from happening. 19 20 Chairman King opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 21 Chairman King closed the Public Hearing. 22 23 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#5600) 24 25 Vice-Chairman Boutte said he believes that under the City's ordinances, there are ways for them to 26 come in and request a shade structure that would not require variances; they could still have 27 something for their employees to get out of the sun that would not require a variance. He said he has 28 a very difficult time supporting this as it is. 29 30 Commissioner Jones thinks it is imperative that an employer make his place of business as safe for 31 his employees that he possibly can and to do the things that are within his fiduciary responsibility 32 as an employer to do. He agrees that there are some things that could be done to this structure that 33 would make it more in compliance with the ordinances, however, he thinks the employer is doing 34 this on behalf of his employees in good faith. He thinks the structure is far enough off of Davis 35 Boulevard that you almost have to be looking directly at it to see it. He thinks it makes sense and 36 would be in the best interest of the Commission to vote in favor of it. 37 38 Vice-Chairman Boutte said if the Commission approves this, he thinks Southlake is sending out the 39 message that Southlake has lowered its standards and will give variances to ordinances passed a 40 couple of years ago. 41 42 Commissioner Muller said there is more air flow with this type of structure than with a permanent 43 structure. She said there will be a lot of movement around the cars and said she understands the point 44 made regarding masonry columns creating more door dings. With an S.U.P., the Commission could Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 10 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 put a time limit on it, possibly one year, and if after looking at it the City determines it to be an 2 eyesore, then they should not grant the S.U.P. again and the applicant could put in a permanent 3 structure. 4 5 Director Payne said he believes there may have been a misinterpretation as to whether a variance 6 is required for this particular roof. He said this particular type of design with the membrane roof 7 would be allowed under the City's code. He read the statement from the Zoning Ordinance. He said 8 this is not a flat membrane-type roof; it has a peak. He said he does not think that particular variance 9 is necessary. He apologized and said the roof issue should not be before the Commission, but they 10 would still need to consider the issue regarding the masonry support columns. 11 12 Chairman King asked the applicant if he is willing to provide masonry supports. Mr. White said he 13 will do whatever he has to do. He said he would rather not put masonry around the poles because 14 it would make them bigger and problems are more likely. 15 16 Motion was made to approve ZA00-078 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 17 24, 2000, and to delete Item#1 (masonry support columns) and to approve the S.U.P. for a period 18 of one year. 19 20 Motion: Muller 21 Second: Terrell 22 23 Chairman King thinks if the City is going to grant the S.U.P. and the applicant is going to put the 24 structure up with the chance it may have to come down in 12 months puts the applicant in a tough 25 position. 26 27 Commissioner Jones agreed with Chairman King. 28 29 Ayes: Muller, Horne, Terrell 30 Nays: Jones, Stansell, Boutte, King 31 Vote: 3-4 32 Motion failed. 33 34 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section#6698) 35 36 Chairman King said he would hate to be the applicant with the choice of having to put this structure 37 up knowing it may have to come down in a year or not putting it up at all so he is not out the 38 expense. He said he could see giving them a little more time such as 24 months or 36 months. 39 40 Commissioner Terrell said the only variance they have now is the masonry, so in a year if the City 41 didn't like it, they could put up some masonry and be in full compliance. 42 43 Commissioner Jones said that does not make any sense because someone is not going to be able to 44 tell whether it is stucco masonry or metal that is painted the same color as the building from that Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 11 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 distance off the road. He said it is not an aesthetical issue — either the Commission grants the 2 variance or they don't. 3 4 Chairman King said he was originally thinking that if it did not work, they would have to take the 5 structure down, but if they can put up masonry instead and the Commission wants to go along with 6 the one year time limit, he would be inclined to change his vote if a motion was on the table. 7 8 Motion was made to approve ZA00-078 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 9 24, 2000, and to delete Item#1 (masonry support columns) and to approve the S.U.P. for a period 10 of one year. 11 12 Motion: Muller 13 Second: Terrell 14 Ayes: Horne, Terrell, Muller, King 15 Nays: Jones, Stansell, Boutte 16 Approved: 4-3 17 Motion carried. 18 19 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #6936) 20 21 AGENDA ITEM #15, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 22 Chairman King adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. on July 6, 2000. 23 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 07-06-00, tape 1, section #6955) 25 26 27 28 38 31 Dennis King 32 Chairman 33 34 35 ATTEST: 36 37 40 Lori A. Farwell 41 Planning Secretary 42 43 N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MTG\MIN\2000\07-06-00.DOC Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on July 6, 2000 12 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS JUNE 20,2000 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tern Gary Fawks; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Ronnie Kendall. Members: Patsy DuPre, Greg Standerfer, Rex Potter, and Keith Shankland. CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Billy Campbell; Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton; Director of Finance Sharen Elam; Director of Economic Development Greg Last; Director of Human Resources Lauren Safranek; Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman; Director of Planning Bruce Payne; Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter; Senior Planner Dennis Killough, Director of Public Works Ron Harper; Deputy Director of Engineerii '; Services Charlie Thomas; Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe; Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson; Fire Chief Ricky Black; Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson; City Attorney E. Allen Taylor Jr.; and, City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand. WORK SESSION: Mayor Rick Stacy called the work session to order at 5:20 p.m. Councilmembers and staff discussed items on the agenda. The work session was audio and video tape-recorded for future reference. Copies are available by request from the City Secretary. 1 During the work session, City Council desired to add agenda items #8-B, #8-C, #8-E,#8-F, #8-G, #8-H, and #10-A to the consent agenda. The work session ended at 5:45 p.m. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Agenda Item #1-A, Call to Order Mayor Rick Stacy called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 5:47 p.m. City Council meetings are video and audio tape-recorded for future reference and copies are available upon request from the City Secretary. Agenda Item#2-A,Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that the City Council would be going into Executive Session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.086 to seek legal advise from our City Attorney; to deliberate regarding real property matters; to deliberate regarding a prospective gift; to deliberate Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 1 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL regarding personnel matters; to deliberate regarding security devices; and/or to deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. Council adjourned into executive session at 5:50 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:25 p.m. Agenda Item#2-B,Action Necessary/Executive Session During the executive session, Council discussed the appointments to boards, commissions and committees as follow: Agenda Item #9-A, Resolution No. 00-47, Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-47, naming Gary Fawks as Mayor Pro Tern and Ronnie Kendall as Deputy Mayor Pro Tern for a one (1)year term. Motion: Kendall Second: Shankland Ayes: Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-B, Resolution No. 00-53, Appointments to the Building Board of Appeals Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-53, naming the following persons to the Building Board of Appeals: Place 2, David Lambert [term to expire in May 2002]; Place 4, Eddie Pierce [term to expire in May 2002]; Place 7 Alternate #1, Kosse Maykus [term to expire in May 2002]; and, Paul Sullivan. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-C, Resolution No. 00-54, Appointments to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-54, naming the following to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee: Place 1, Patsy DuPre [Council position to expire in May 2001]; Place 2, Keith Shankland [Council position to expire in May 2001]; and Place 6, Brad Bartholomew [citizen-at-large position to expire in May 2001]. Motion: Kendall Second: DuPre Ayes: Kendall, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Shankand, and Stacy Nays: None Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 2 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-D, Resolution No. 00-55, Appointments to the Joint Utilization Committee Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-55, naming Greg Standerfer [Councilmember appointee] and Wendi Carlucci [citizen-at-large] to two (2) year terms on the committee. Motion: Kendall Second: Shankland Ayes: Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item#9-E, Resolution No. 00-56,Appointments to the Library Board Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-5 appointing the following to the Library Board with terms to expire in May, 2002: Place 1, Marge Zielke; Place 2, Daphne Peggy Firestone; and, Place 3, Debbie Baynard. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Standerfer, Potter,Fawks, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-F, Resolution No. 00-57, Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-57, naming the following to the Parks and Recreation Board for two (2) year terms: Place 2, Michael Nelson with a term to expire in May 2001; and Place 8, Chris Miltenberger with a term to expire in May 2002. Motion: Kendall Second: DuPre Ayes: Kendall, DuPre, Standerfer,Potter, Fawks, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-G, Resolution No. 00-58, Appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-58, naming the following to the Planning and Zoning Commission with terms to expire in May, 2002: James Jones, Vernon Stansell, John Terrell, and Pamela Muller. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter,Fawks, and Stacy Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 3 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-H, Resolution No. 00-59, Appointments to the Senior Advisory Commission. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-59, naming the following to the Senior Commission: Place 1, Linda Moore [term to expire in May 2002]; Place 2, Jeanne Alexander [term to expire n May 2002]; Place 3 William Cosgrove [term to expire in May 2002]; Place 5 Connie Montague [term to expire in May 2002] and Alternate #1, Gerald Montague [term to expire May 2001]. Motion: Kendall Second: DuPre Ayes: Kendall, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-I, Resolution No. 00-60, Appointments to the Southlake Park Development Corporation Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-60, naming the following to the Southlake Park Development Corporation: Councilmember Position: Gary Fawks [term to expire May 2002]; Councilmember Position: Rick Stacy [term to expire May 2002]; Councilmember Position: Ronnie Kendall [term to expire May 2001] and Citizen Position: Tad Stephens [term to expire May 2002]. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Standerfer, Potter,Fawks, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-J, Resolution No. 00-61, Appointment to the Southlake Library Foundation Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-61, naming Rick Stacy [Council representative] to the Southlake Library Foundation Board of Directors. Motion: Kendall Second: Shankland Ayes: Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter,Fawks, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 4 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #9-K, Resolution 00-62, Appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustment Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-62, Appointing the following members to the Zoning Board of Adjustment: Mike Sandlin [for a term to expire in May 2001]; Lewis Miltenberger [for a term to expire in May 2002]; John Reynal [for a term to expire in May 2002]; Alternate #1 Susan Johnson [for a term to expire in May 2002]. The resolution also names W. Ralph Evans as chairman and Mike Sandlin as Vice-Chairman. Motion: Kendall Section: DuPre Ayes: Kendall, DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #9-L, Resolution No. 00-65, Appointment of Council Representative as Liaison to DFW Airport Board • Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00- 65, naming Councilmember Keith Shankland as representative Liaison to Dallas/Fort Worth [DFW] Airport for a one year term. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Standerfer, Potter,Fawks, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #3,Invocation The invocation was led by Chaplain of the Month Dr. Mike Beaugh, Southlake Presbyterian Church. Agenda Item #4-A, Mayor's Report Mayor Rick Stacy made the following announcements: > Each year the Texas Public Works Association honors one of its members for continued service to the organization and for service to the profession of public works. At its annual meeting held last week in Plano, the Association honored Charlie Thomas with its Chapter Service Award for the year 2000. > Next Monday and Tuesday, June 26th and 27th, Southlake City Council will hold their annual Retreat to discuss budget and developmental issues. Monday evening the retreat will be held in the Council Chambers at City Hall; Tuesday session to be held in the Solana Education Center. Consult agendas posted on the bulletin boards and website for specific times. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 5 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL > There will not be a City Council meeting on July 4th in celebration of Independence Day. The next regular city council meeting will be held on July 18. > City offices will be closed on Tuesday, July 4th in observance of Independence Day. > The City of Southlake and Southlake Town Square will host the "Stars and Stripes Independence Day" celebration on Monday, July 3rd from 7-10 p.m. at Town Square. There will be a children's parade and many other family-fun activities. Bring your blankets, lawn chairs, and picnics and join in this old- fashioned family event. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report City Manager Billy Campbell stated that there would not be a report tonight. Agenda Item #4-C, SPIN Report Kim O'Brien, representative for SPIN #1, gave the SPIN Report. Ms. O'Brien stated that several meetings had been held lately, including one on the subject of the Trail Master Plan, where there was a good turnout. The residents in attendance stated they did not feel as though the consultants were listening to what the residents were saying. Ms. O'Brien noted that on October 7, 2000, SPIN would sponsor "trails clean up" day. She asked that everyone put that date on his or her calendar. Also during SPIN Reports, Martin Schelling was present and commented that not much was going on in his SPIN area. Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda Mayor Rick Stacy informed the audience that "Consent" agenda items, which consist of several items, are considered by one vote. He said if anyone in the audience had a request for an item not to be on the consent agenda, that item would be deleted from that portion of the agenda and considered separately. The consent items are as follows: 5-A. Approval of the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on June 6, 2000. 5-B. Resolution No. 00-63, amending the Employee Handbook to include the "Family Medical Leave"policy. 5-C. Approval of a professional service agreement with Belcheff& Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and North Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 6 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 5-D. Approval of a professional service agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. 5-E. Resolution No. 00-67, Authorizing the Director of Public Safety to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City vehicles. 5-F. Resolution No. 00-51, Changing terms for Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board members. 5-G. Ordinance No.784, 1st Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. 5-H. Ordinance No. 785, 1st Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. 5-I. Ordinance No. 480-342, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 31 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, with a requested zoning of"0-1" Office District. Applicant: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. Owner: Southlake Associated Limited Partnership. 5-J. Resolution No. 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. 5-K. Authorize the Mayor to execute Takeover Agreement for sanitary sewer improvements in Jellico Estates with Amwest Surety Insurance. 5-L. Authorize the Mayor to execute a developer agreement for Southlake Crossing, I Block 1, Lots 5 & 6 [Hobby Lobby]. 5-M. Recognize the appointment of Recon, Zurka, and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division. 8-A. Ordinance No. 480-343, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-047), Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. 8-B. Ordinance No. 480-344, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-048), Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 7 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 8-C. ZA 00-049, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. 8-E. ZA 00-055, Plat Revision of Proposed Lots 11 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition. 8-F. ZA 99-112, Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza, on property legally described as Tracts 2A1A, 2A2A, 11 and 11E, situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474 and being approximately 32.6 acres. Applicant: Caddy Property Management. Owners: Roer G. Williams, E.C. White, Michael and Leah Sathre, Dean Shanklin, and Richard Shanidin. 8-G. Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board" and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and length of terms. 8-H. Ordim ce No. 787, 1st Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. 10-A. Approval of Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc. for the construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda as follows: Item #5-A, #5-B, #5-C, with Hillwood Estates only in the amount of$19,673; Item#5-D, for Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates only in the amount of $32,000; Item #5-E, #5-F, #5-G, #5-H, #5-I, #5-J, #5-K, #5-L, #5-M; #8-A, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated June 2, 2000, and allowing the driveways as shown; Item#8-B, subject to Concept Plan Review Summary #3, dated June 2, 2000; Item #8-C, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated June 2, 2000; Item #8-E, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000; Item#8-F, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000 allowing the requested variances; Item#8-G,#8-H, and#10-A. Motion: Fawks Second: Standerfer Ayes: Fawks, Standerfer, Potter,Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on June 6, 2000. The minutes were approved as presented. 5-B. Resolution No. 00-63, Amending the personnel policies handbook to include the Family Medical Leave Policy. This policy establishes the procedures the City has operated under to comply with the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993.This policy Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20, 2000 Page 8 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL shall provide authorized leave for family and medical reasons to eligible employees in accordance with the provision of the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993. The purpose of this policy is to enable each eligible employee to take absences from work for up to 12 weeks during a 12-month period for new child leave and/or medically-related reasons due to a serious health conditions regarding the employee, spouse, child or parent. This policy does not provide additional leave for employees, but designates leave that is taken as family medical leave (FMLA leave) if it meets the requirements. An employee would use accrued leave (sick, vacation and compensatory leave) for this purpose. 5-C. Approval of a professional service agreement with Belcheff&Associates, Inc.for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and North Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. Each year as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, the city Council appropriates funds in the CIP budget to engineer and construct sanitary sewer improvements to serve neighborhoods currently on septic systems. The City Council approved in the CIP budget to ent,',neer and design the sanitary sewer to serve Hillside Estates and North Pearson/Pecan Acres. City Council approved the professional services agreement with Belcheff& Associates, Inc. for the Hillwood Estates only in the amount of$19,673. 5-D. Approval of a professional service agreement with Cheatham &Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Additions. The City Council approved in the CIP budget funds to engineer and design the sanitary sewer to serve for Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates only in the amount of $32,000. 5-E. Resolution No. 00-67, Authorizing the Director of Public Safety to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City vehicles. On April 18, 1989, Resolution No. 89-24 was approved by the City Council, authorizing Police Chief James W. Campbell to sign the forms required to be submitted for registration requesting regular license plates for exempt vehicles. Due to the fact that the Chief of Police is no longer James W. Campbell, a new resolution must be submitted to the Department of Transportation in order for the City to be able to obtain regular license plates for exempt vehicles as requested by Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson. 5-F. Resolution No. 00-51, Changing terms for Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board Members. Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board is made up of two representatives from each of the participating entities. The role of the Advisory Board is to serve as a liaison between the Teen Court program and the entity they represent. They help the Teen Court Coordinator determine ways to better serve the entities. Councilmember Pasty DuPre recommended the term of appointment be changed from a one-year appointment to a two-year appointment. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20, 2000 Page 9 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 5-G. Ordinance No. 784, Ist Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. During the 76th Legislative Session, Senate Bill #601 was passed amending Article 102.0172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize the City of Southlake to create by ordinance a Municipal Court Technology Fund. A defendant convicted of a misdemeanor may be required to pay a fee not to exceed $4 as a municipal court cost. If a person received probation or deferred adjudication, or if the court defers final disposition of the case, the defendant is considered convicted. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for the municipal court. These enhancements may include computer systems, computer networks, computer hardware, imaging systems, electronic kiosks, electric ticket writers and docket management systems. This Article expires September 1, 2005. Public hearing for this ordinance is set at July 18, 2000. 5-H. Ordinance No. 785, 1 S`Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. When a sworn complaint or affida it based on probable cause has been filed before the municipal court, the judge may issue a warrant for the arrest and/or detention of the accused. During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill #163 was passed amending Article 102.011(a)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by increasing the fee for executing or processing an issued Warrant of Arrest or Copies Pro Fine Warrant from $35.00 to $50.00 The approval of and implementation of this fee could result in the collection of an estimated $15,000 to $45,000 per year in additional revenues to the City of Southlake. Public hearing for this ordinance is set at July 18,2000. 5-I. Ordinance No. 480-342, 1Sr Reading, (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C, situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District with a requested zoning of"0-1" Office District. Applicant: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. Public hearing for this ordinance is set at July 18,2000. 5-J. Resolution No. 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. The City is diverting sewer from the north basin to the south basin in two areas of the City. The City has a diversion agreement with Trinity River Authority (TRA) to allow such diversion until November 2000. The City is in the process of constructing sanitary sewer improvements to eliminate the diversion in one of the two areas. There is one project that has not been awarded to a contractor to construct improvements to eliminate the diversion in the other area. This project is the construction of an 18" sanitary sewer line along North Carroll from the Dove Creek lift station to the existing N-3 gravity line. The construction plans for this project are complete and the City is acquiring the necessary two easements to construct this project. The City has reached a verbal agreement with one of the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 10 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL property owners (Hight property) for an easement. The City has made several attempts to acquire the easement from the other property owner, Mr. and Mrs. James Haltom, but to no avail. The City must move forward to acquire this easement in order to meet the November 2000 deadline in the TRA Diversion Agreement. Therefore, staff recommends implementing condemnation proceedings to acquire the easement. The City will be required to pay the appraisal cost, which will be between $1200 and $2500. The City will be required to pay the property owner fair market value for the easement. Additionally, if the condemnation action proceeds to the Commissioner's Court; the City will incur attorney's fees and possible consulting fees from the appraiser, engineer, etc. 5-K.Authorize the Mayor to execute Takeover Agreement for sanitary sewer improvements in Jellico Estates with Amwest Surety Insurance. On February 2, 1999, the City Council awarded the contract for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Jellico Estates Addition to Everspan, Inc. in the amount of $374,723.00. Construction proceeded during several months until the project was almost complete. In February 2000, the City r eived notice that Everspan, Inc. had gone into bankruptcy. The City staff immediately began to communicate with the surety company, Amwest Surety Insurance Company, to get the remaining construction completed. The remaining work is basically completing the items listed on a "punch list" for correction or completion. Amwest Surety Company has requested that the City enter into a Takeover Agreement with them prior to the completion of the work to be done on this project. This is a typical agreement between the owner and the surety re-stating the responsibilities of each in the completion of this contract. 5-L. Authorize the Mayor to execute a developer agreement for Southlake Crossing, Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 & 6, [Hobby Lobby]. The plat for Southlake Crossing Phase II, Block 1,Lots 5 & 6 was approved in July 1995. The site plan for Hobby Lobby (Southlake Marketplace Phase 3) which is on Lots 5 & 6 was approved on January 18, 2000. This developer's agreement covers the construction of on-site public water and sanitary sewer lines. There is a park fee of $4,050. When the property was platted in 1995, the Park Fee was $500 per acre and the site consists of 10.1 acres. 5-M. Recognize and appoint Recon, Zurka, and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public-Safety, Police Services Division. The Southlake Department of Public Safety acquired its first canine in July of 1992. City Council created an official position for the canine with Resolution No. 92-33. Since the origination of the canine program, we have used three canines. Luger is the only canine remaining active today. The City of Southlake is located in a zone known as the "High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area" by the Drug Enforcement Agency. As a result of this designation, we have applied for and received federal grants to combat drug trafficking along the SH 114 corridor. The first grant we received ($15,000) was for an "infrared scope" and the second ($17,000) was received last month for special applications. This equipment is used to find narcotics and totals Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20, 2000 Page 11 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL $32,000 received in grants to combat drug use and trafficking in our community. The Officers own the dogs and provide them for our use at a cost of $150 per month, plus insurance on the animal. In the event the canine is injured, killed, or retired, the City will replace the canine from insurance proceeds. 8-A. Ordinance No. 480-343, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-047), Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lots 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake and being approximately 4.054 acres. The first reading of the ordinance was approved subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000 and allowing the driveways as shown. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District with a requested zoning of "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. The public hearing is set for July 18,2000. 8-B. Ordinance No. 480-344, .1s1 Reading, (ZA 00-0, 3), Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being approximately 0.822 acres. The first reading of the ordinance was approved subject to the Concept Plan Review Summary #3, dated June 2, 2000. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District with a requested zoning of"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The public hearing is set for July 18,2000. 8-C. ZA 00-049, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, and being approximately 4.8767 acres. This item was approved subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. 8-E. ZA 00-055, Plat Revision of Proposed Lots 1 R1 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition and being approximately 10.537 acres. This plat revision was approved subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated, June 2, 2000. 8-F. ZA 99-112, Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza, on property legally described as Tracts 2A1A, 2A2A, 11, and 11E, situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being approximately 32.6 acres. This preliminary plat was approved subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, allowing the requested variances. The primary purpose of this plat is to allocate right-of-way for extension of Nolen Drive. 8-G. Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board, " and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and the length of terms. Ordinance No. 646 and Section 12-77 of the City of Southlake City Code stated the following: "The Board shall consist Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 12 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of nine citizens of the city, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for three-year terms. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the board shall be numbered one through nine." Currently there are eight (8) active board members, and with the recent expiration of two (2) board members terms. Discussions have begun on the potential of reducing the number of board members from nine to seven members, and reducing the length of terms from three years to two years. A seven member board would be consistent with the other City Boards. Public hearing set for July 18,2000. 8-H. Ordinance No. 787, 1S`Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1, of the Kimball/1709 Addition. Several easements were required to install sanitary sewer and water improvements along the south side of SH 114 from North Kimball Avenue to Gateway Plaza, Phase I. The sewer and water improvements were required to relocate existing facilities that were in conflict with the SH 114 reconstruction. The water and sewer improvements have been constructed. The water and sewer : Aprovements crossed the tracts of properties that make-up Gateway Plaza, Phase 2. The land and title company handling the closing of the tracts of property discovered that the wrong property owner had inadvertently signed one of the easements. However, the easement was recorded with Tarrant County. In order to clear the title to the land, the easement must be abandoned. The rightful property owner is in the process of executing the required easement. Public hearing set for July 18,2000. 10-A. Approval of Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc., for the construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court. The original contract for construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court was $365,253. This included construction of a sidewalk along Love Henry Court. The City Council directed staff to eliminate the sidewalk from the contract. This was accomplished by Change Order No. 1 and reduced the contract by $27,192. Change Order No. 2 was for the extension of the sanitary sewer along Shady Oaks and Love Henry Court to serve five properties along Shady Oaks. Change Order No. 2 totaled $39,393.26. The costs associated with this project, including change orders 1,2, are 3 are tabulated below: o The original contract amount was $365,253. o The engineering, surveying, and testing cost was $30,078.31 o Change Order No. 1 was $27,192 o Change Order No. 2 was $39,393.25 o Change Order No. 3 is $11,460.00 Therefore, the total cost for the project is $418,992.56, which is $59,992.56 over the budgeted amount of $4,359,000. The cost overrun will have to be funded using available funds that exist from projects that were below budget. The cost for this project has been included in the CIP Project cost ledger. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 13 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #6, Public Forum No comments were made during the public forum. Agenda Item #7-A, ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with"CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. This item was tabled during the June 6, 2000 City Council and this is a continuation of the public hearing. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented ZA 00-026, and noted that thirteen (13) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notificatio~i area and two (2) responses have been received from Brian Mitcham, Mitcham Homes, LC., 5121 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville, in favor; and Randall Sullivan, Randy Sullivan Custom Homes, Inc, 1500 Corporate Circle, Suite 18, Southlake, in favor. Councilmember Greg Standerfer asked, "Is the impact of the school going to be served well enough with three lanes in front of the school or do we need the entire cross-section of Carroll Avenue to be built out?" City Engineer Charlie Thomas stated the addition of one lane and a turn lane would probably handle the turning movement in front of the school. The city would have to build the additional lanes. Director of Public Works Ron Harper stated there would be funds identified in the TIF to build the roadway, however, those funds are not shown in the CIP at this time. We would have to reimburse the school district if they pay to build the roadway at this time. Councilmember Rex Potter stated, "The city will have to work with the school to see how we can get the road in there at the same time that the school is being built. There is a cost savings by putting in the additional lanes at the same time the school is being built." Councilmember Ronnie Kendall stated she did not question the needs,just the funding. Brent Cline, Total Manager Program, 860 West Airport Freeway, Hurst. Mr. Cline stated regarding the number of lanes to be built on South Carroll Avenue in front of the school, "The CISD will put in the third lane, however, regarding the issue of the school District putting in five lanes -- if they do -- they will need to be reimbursed for the additional lanes by February, 2001." Councilmember Gary Fawks stated the school needs to know "date certain" when they could be reimbursed for the additional lanes because they are locked into funding of the project. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 14 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Dr. Ted Gillum, CISD Superintendent. Dr. Gillumm stated, "We have talked about this with the board and the main issue is that the latest they could go with any plan for reimbursement is February, 2001. There is another issue, and the board needs to be briefed with the school district's attorney to be sure that what we are talking about, we can actually do. I don't have that briefing at this time. The board in general agrees with the concept, and we need to know that legally we can do it, within the time line we are talking about. I feel positive about it but we need to clear those two hurdles." Councilmember Patsy DuPre stated the JUC met on May 20, and asked if there was not time to get an opinion before now? Dr. Gilliam stated they had talked with the board but there is constitutional issues with spending bond money for other issues, even though it will be reimbursed. He asked their attorney's to make it work, keeping in mind the "safety" issue with the turn lanes. DuPre commented, "The other issue is, that we haven't had the final vote that it will take, to get this done." Brent Cline stated since the last plan, they have had several meetings with the neighbors to the north. He noted that the issue of the drive to the north, has been reproporti ned to align with Bordeaux. He noted that the fence separating the park and school has been changed to keep the kids away from the pond. The fence is a vinyl-clad chain link fence, hopefully temporary [five to ten years]. The fence will be green and sodded on each side. The wrought iron fence out front will also be green in color. The fence along the ditch is a 6' fence, which will cost about$19 to $20 dollars per linear foot. CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: Ed Adams, 1203 Lorraine Court, Southlake. Mr. Adams stated his home backs up to Carroll Avenue. He stated the CISD has worked to get them a crosswalk, adding that no body wants a four-lane road behind their home, and that they want the project done properly. He wants the entire project done all at once. Keith Turner, 1027 East Continental Boulevard, Southlake. Mr. Turner stated, "We just need three traffic officers at this location every morning." Public hearing closed. Mayor Rick Stacy asked Kevin Hugman what time frame the city plans on filling in the pond and if the city has ever gotten a plan for the pond? Director of Community Services stated the city does not have a plan for the pond at this time. Mayor Stacy stated by filling in the pond, the CISD could put their money in the ditch-fund and get the pond filled in and work on the "big"picture. The City Council agreed to fill in the pond to resolve this problem. Councilmember Gary Fawks questioned the roadway, noting that the five-lane road will be addressed in the developer agreement. The City Attorney responded that by adding the wording to the developer agreement, it would add credence to the legal review by the CISD attorney. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 15 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion was made to approve ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated June 16, 2000; incorporating the site plan provided to Council tonight [amendment dated June 15, 2000]; a condition of the site plan approval is that the roadway will be developed to five (5) lanes, and that the City will enter into a developer agreement to reimburse the school district for the cost of two of those lanes with reimbursement to the school district by the City by the close of the day on February 1, 2001; recognizing the applicant's agreement to put trees along the front of the property [on northeast Carroll Avenue]; adjusting the northeast sidewalk to meander in the area provided; acknowledging the applicant's willingness to fill in the pond as well as move the fence; require applicant to submit a joint-use agreement with the adjacent church for parking facilities prior to the city's execution of the developers agreement. Motion: Potter Second: Fawks Ayes: Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, and Stacy Tays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-B, ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, CISD NO. 5 Addition ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development with "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented ZA 00-027, noting this was a continuation from the June 6, 2000 agenda. Mr. Carpenter noted that the preliminary plat was required prior to Final Plat. A Final Plat must be filed with Tarrant County Plat Records prior to issuance of a building permit. Senior Planner Dennis Killough commented about relocating the sidewalks. Motion was made to approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000; incorporating the comments about the access easements, adding additional pedestrian easements for the relocation on the sidewalks as mentioned in the last approval. Motion: Potter Second: Standerfer Ayes: Potter, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 16 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #7-C, Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, ZA 99-078 , Carroll High School Addition - natatorium Ordinance No. 480-338, 2'd Reading, (ZA 99-078), Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts lA and 1A1 situated in the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres of land. Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with a requested zoning of "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham& Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. • Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter made the presentation noting that fifty- two (52) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and eleven(11)responses were received from: o Anthony Bologna, 100 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "As property owners, we have serious concerns related to this project; we are opposed to the fact of not strictly complying with the articulation ordinance. We are opposed that the building is taller than allowed by the ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40 feet to clear the height requirements." o David and Sandra Nuese, 102 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "The proposed natatorium does not comply with the articulation ordinance along with several other concerns stated in the cover letter." o Mary Ann and William Harless, 106 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "The building is taller than allowed by ordinance. The building being moved 40' to clear height requirements." o Mahmood Rabbani, 104 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "As property owners, we have serious concerns about this project. We are opposed to the fact that it is not complying strictly with the articulation ordinance. We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40 feet to clear the height requirements." o Rev. Michael Beaugh, Southlake Boulevard Presbyterian Church, P.O. ox 93164 Southlake, in favor. o David Howell, 1408 Park Place, Southlake, opposed. o Craig and Kathy Rodgers, 108 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "I would like to see the building moved closer to the school and away from the homes. I would also like to see the turnaround moved away from the homes (make it a bull-nose turnaround). I would also like to see more landscaping between the building and the homes." o Karen Nyhoff, 1404 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed, "Please do not remove the trees that are along the homeowner fence line. We feel the building is too tall and too close to homes. We are concerned with the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 17 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL parking lot turnaround area being behind our home. We do not wish to have our yard illuminated any more than it already is by the tennis courts." o Kelly and Jack D'Kapich, 1402 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed, "Because the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. Opposed to the building being moved 40 feet to clear height requirements. Does not strictly comply with articulation ordinances." o Daniel and Susan George, 1406 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed, "We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40 feet to clear the height requirements." Windi Carlucci, a member of the Joint Utilization Committee. Ms. Carlucci stated a few months ago she volunteered to look into the landscaping for the schools with Texas native or Texas adaptable plants. The details of this project will be discussed on Thursday at the Joint Use Committee meeting. The original plants were rejected for the reasons that the plants were not adaptable to Texas weather and for the reason that their plans had the DFW look. Al the trees and flowers and shrubs were the same and the committee feels it should be more natural setting." The revised plans for the landscaping have improved. She stated the "before" and "after" pictures would be mounted on the Administration Annex building for public review. Councilmember Rex Potter asked Ms. Carlucci if the neighbors had been invited to this viewing?Ms. Carlucci stated they had and have revised all twelve school site plans. Councilmember Keith Shankland expressed concerns about the lights at the natatorium and was assured that the lights will be on timers. He also asked that the shrub locations be reviewed. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, ZA 99-078, the Rezoning and Revised Sit Plan for Carroll High school subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000; making the following changes: • That CISD is to plant the 750 mitigation trees from Carroll High School in the following manner: 1) at the Carroll High School site, plant the maximum number of trees possible with the commonly accepted horticultural and arboricultural standards as approved by the landscape administrator; 2)the remaining trees be mitigated planted at the remaining CISD school sites possible, and with commonly accepted horticultural and arboricultural standards approved by the landscape administrator; 3) if any additional trees planting are required for mitigation from this site or any of the Kimball Road sites, the landscape administrator is directed to work with CISD in establishing an exchange plan to permit the credit of those trees to go toward maximizing the landscaping at all school sites, including allowing credit toward interior landscape and bufferyard requirements; 4) CISD is to provide a detailed plan no later than March 1, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 18 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 2001 to reflect a phased plan over a five-year period to achieve the planting requirements with a minimum of 1/5 of the plantings take place each year and to be maintained in perpetuity; • Subject to two hooded lights, 10-foot high, shielded to protect neighbors to the east and south plus the four-foot ballards appropriately timed to operating hours as approved by the Chief of Building Services; • That the fence on the southwest corner of the school site shall be replaced and that all fencing abutting the school site shall be repaired and maintained in perpetuity; • Incorporating the City Council action from the first reading. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item#7-D, ZA 00-045, Site Plan for Costco Wholesale ZA 00-045, Site Plan for Costco Wholesale, on property legally described as portions of Tracts 1,2,3, &4, W.E. Mayfield's Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 16.3702 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, with a proposed zoning of "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses including a gasoline service station and tire, batteries, and automobile accessories. Applicant: Kimley-Horn and Associates. Owners: Donald E. Vogel, Chung Cheng Hong, Glen Scott Harrell, and Wetzel Family Partnership. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented this item noting that thirteen (13) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and two responses were received: Chung-Cheng Hong, 640 107th Street Arlington, in favor; and, Michael Wetzel, General partner, Wetzel Family Partnership Ltd., 102 Westlake Drive, Ste 106, Austin, in favor, "more tax dollars for Southlake and it finishes out the 1st phase on the east end." The applicant was present to answer questions for Council. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 00-045, Site Plan for Costco Wholesales, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated June 16, 2000; incorporating the actions taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and including the amended Site Plan submitted on June 19, 2000. Motion: DuPre Second: Kendall Ayes: DuPre, Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, and Stacy Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 19 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-E, Resolution No. 00-66, (ZA 00-063), Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Packaged Beer for Tom Thumb Market Resolution No. 00-66 (ZA 00-063), Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption, per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) on property legally described as Lot 2R1, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition and being approximately 7.691 acres of land. Owner: EPIPD-Crossroads Square, L.P. Applicant: Tom Thumb. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented Resolution No. 00-66, noting that nine (9) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) response was received from Robert and Suzanne Harvey, 910 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, in favor. Mr. Carpenter noted that due to the limited scope of this request and the fact that no changes are to be made to the previously approved concept/site plan, no new rev .;w letter was generated. This site was subject to all conditions of the previously approved plans. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the pubic hearing. City Attorney E. Allen Taylor Jr. commented on the fact that the state law requires that alcoholic beverages cannot be sold within 200' of a church or school. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-66 as presented. Motion: Potter Second: Fawks Ayes: Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #7-F, Ordinance No. 781, 2"d Reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code Designating Speed Limits in Cambridge Place Addition Ordinance No. 781, 2"d Reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-790 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25-miles per hour for neighborhood streets in Cambridge Place Addition subdivision, was presented by City Engineer Charlie Thomas, who noted that he received a petition of request from the Cambridge Place Homeowners Association for the City Council to consider reducing the speed limit in Cambridge Place Addition to 25 mph. Mr. Thomas stated that the Department of Public Safety placed the "smart trailer" and conducted additional enforcement to attempt to educate the offending drivers. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 20 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL The streets in the subdivision include: Brookshire Drive Chaucer Court, Manchester Court, Montfort Court, Westminister Way, Derby Court, Chatham Court, York Court, Sussex Court, Kent Court, Rainbow Street and Ponderosa. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance 781, 2"d Reading, due to the special hazards that exist within this neighborhood and designate the speed limit within Cambridge Addition to 25-miles per hour. Motion: Kendall Second: Standerfer Ayes: Kendall, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Councilmember Patsy DrPre was out of the room and did not vote for Ordinance No. 781. Agenda Item #7-G, Ordinance No. 782,2"d Reading,TMRS Buy-Back Option Director of Human Resources Lauren Safranek presented Ordinance No. 782 for second reading, which authorizes and allows a buy-back option for specific employees with Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). Ms. Safranek stated that TMRS permits participating cities to pass an ordinance allowing its qualified employees to "buy-back" previously forfeited TMRS service credit. This is possible even if the employee's service credit was previously terminated and the employee withdrew member deposits. Forfeited service can be bought back from the City of Southlake, or another participating TMRS city. To "buy-back' previously forfeited service credit and member deposits, the employee must: o Be an employee of the city and a member of TMRS on the date of the"Buy-back" ordinance's adoption; and, o Must have at least 24 consecutive months of service credit as an employee of the city adopting the ordinance; and, o Re-deposit, in a lump sum, all of the amount previously withdrawn plus the reinstatement fee equal to 5% per year of the amount withdrawn. Ms. Safranek stated, "Currently, there are twenty-two (22) employees that would be eligible for buy-back, if this ordinance were adopted. If all employees chose to buy back their forfeited service credit, the City's contribution rate would increase by 37%. When the last buy-back ordinance was passed, fifteen (15) employees were eligible for buy back. Since that time, only three (3)employees have bought back forfeited service credit. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 782, 2"d Reading, as presented. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 21 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion: Kendall Second: Potter Ayes: Kendall, Potter, Fawks, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #8_D, Ordinance No. 480-345, lst Reading (ZA 00-064), Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park Ordinance No. 480-345, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-064), Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park, on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S ?-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Requested zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. Applicant: Cheatham and Associates. Owner: City of Southlake. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented Ordinance No. 480-345, noting that thirty-five (35)notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and five (5) responses were received from: o James K. Zitnik, 340 Green Oaks Lane, Southlake, undecided, "This explanation is unclear". o Sarif Reaz, 900 San Saba Drive, Southlake, in favor, "I am Sharif Reaz in favor of request for the following property for retail commercial." o Christine Mediate, 220 Green Oaks Lane, Southlake, opposed, "What is the plan for usage of this lot?" o V. Stanton Mediate, 200 Green Oaks Lane, Southlake, opposed, "What is planned for this lot?" o Robert Harvey, 901 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, opposed, "We are opposed until it is better explained what will be stored at this site.The firm of Cheatham and Associates maybe could `help' in providing better details as it pertains to zoning requests and not waste our time. Hopefully the City of Southlake did not have to pay them for this work." Director of Community Service Kevin Hugman explained the need for this zoning change in order to comply with the outside storage ordinance. He stated the landscaping was placed so that it would out show the three (3) locations for soft drink vending machines at Bicentennial Park. Councilmember Patsy DuPre stated she remembers discussing this issue at the same time that the contract for Coca-Cola was being discussed. Whatever happens with this Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 22 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL particular issue, she noted that she personally feels we should revisit the ordinance and where soft drink vending machines can be located. She stated, "If we are going to make an exception for our park, which I realize these are public facilities and parks, but we so often say we are going to follow what we expect everybody else to do. I don't mind making an exception at this time as long as we are committed to reviewing the outside storage ordinance." Councilmember Rex Potter stated, "The only thing I am talking about changing is making it where these type of facilities and schools, and where you have a "CS" zoning. I don't intend to change the ordinance. We are not taking anything from kids at this park. This is about whether or not we are trying to make it look nice." He stated, "This is like the variance Council gave with the flowers. Once we see it -- once we know what it is, then we allowed a variance when we could be sure it was acceptable to what we want." Mayor Stacy stated, "We must be sure that what we are proposing, we are going to be willing to offer it to a Wal-Mart or Kroger, or A!bertson's. If it is good enough for us then it should be good enough for them." Councilmember Greg Standerfer stated, "That is my point. I haven't heard a ground swell of a few stores having coke machines out front. If we are going to make our business in Southlake comply with a "no" outside vending machine ordinance, then I think we need to do it too. I don't support putting the machines outside unless we are willing to let others do it like wise." Councilmember Rex Potter stated, "When we revisit the ordinance, I feel as long as we don't see it from the road;that is what I care about." Councilmember Keith Shankland stated, "I think it ought to be emphasized that the money that is generated by the machines will benefit the kids and the city. I agree, we ought to revisit this ordinance. I wasn't on Council but I was on the Planning and Zoning Commission when this ordinance came through, and I don't want to be hypercritical by granting the first variance to us." Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-345, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-064), the Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park, incorporating the Site Plan Review Summary #2, dated June 2, 2000, allowing the variances granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission and also granting the variance to Item #2, [outside screening devices]. Motion: DuPre Second: Fawks Ayes: DuPre, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Potter, and Stacy Nays: Standerfer Approved: 6-1 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 23 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #10-B,Award of bid for Lighting for Bicentennial Park Game Fields Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman presented to Council the award of bid for lighting for Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and#10, to NEMA 3 Electric. Mr. Hugman explained the bid specifications for the construction of the game field lighting require the following project scope: o Constructing lighting sufficient to distribute thirty (30) foot-candles throughout game fields#4, #5, and #10; o Establish electrical capacity to complete two (2) existing scoreboards and provide electrical capacity for an additional two (2) future scoreboards. This includes establishing service for three (3) existing backstop scorekeeping tables and one (1) future backstop scorekeeping table. o Develop and coordinate the location and direction of security light for the game fields with staff, and install conduit to provide future light and single duplex receptacle service to two (2) existing softball batting cages. Mr. Hugman stated SPDC and the City Council approved funding in the amount of $200,000 in the FY 1999-2000 Parks Capital Improvement Budget for game field lighting construction at Bicentennial Park fields#4, #5, and#10. To date $1,470 has been expended for the development of the lighting plan design, leaving an unencumbered balance of$198,530. Motion was made to approve the award of bid for lighting for Bicentennial Park game fields#4, #5, and#10 to NEMA 3. Motion: Fawks Second: Standerfer Ayes: Fawks, Standerfer, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #11-A, Discussion: Ordinance No. 783,Municipal Court of Record. Court Administrator Sean Leonard explained Ordinance No. 783, providing for the amendment of Article II of Chapter 8 for the Code of Ordinance relating to Municipal Court of Record. During the 76 Texas Legislative Session, House Bill #731 was passed amending Chapter 30 of the Government Code, which standardized all Municipal Courts of Record within the State of Teas. By law the City of Southlake is required to codify this statute and incorporate all of its uniformed policies and procedures by amending Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances. The City Council has the discretion to set the term limits of the judge(s) to either a two-year or four-year term. The current format of the ordinance provides for a four-year term but Council may change the format to allow for a two-year term. This legislative mandate streamlined the qualifications, duties, salaries, powers, terms, selection and removal of judges of municipal courts of record and their clerks, which in turn must be codified by the City of Southlake. Highlights of the ordinance include appointments, compensation, and term limits of the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 24 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL judges, appointments of the Court Clerk, court personnel and court reporter and establishment of a court seal and transcript preparation fee. Staff recommends that this ordinance be placed on the agenda for 1st reading in the near future. Agenda Item #6, Public Forum Brad Bradley, 1657 Creekside Drive, Southlake. Mr. Bradley presented a proclamation approved on May 11, 2000 by the Southlake Chamber of Commerce encouraging the City of Southlake to revise its logo, as they are concerned about the image projected by the city it serves. A copy of the resolution is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Mr. Bradley also encouraged the City Council to begin the planning process for the grand opening of the New Town Hall to be held later this year. He stated the unveiling of a new logo could be the highlight of the grand opening ceremo _y. Agenda Item #12,Adjournment Mayor Rick Stacy adjourned the Regular City Council meeting of June 20, 2000. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary A:\CC-MIN-6-20-00.doc Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 20,2000 Page 25 of 25 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES- NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE RETREAT (DAY ONE) 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS JUNE 26, 2000 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tern Gary Fawks (arrived at 5:40 p.m.); Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Ronnie Kendall. Members: Patsy DuPre, Greg Standerfer, Rex Potter, and Keith Shanldand. CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Billy Campbell; Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton; Director of Finance Sharen Elam; Director of Economic Development Greg Last; Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman; Director of Planning Bruce Payne; Director of Public Safety Garland Wi" .on; City Attorney E. Allen Taylor Jr.; and, City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand. Agenda Item#1, Call to Order Mayor Rick Stacy called the Southlake City Council June Retreat, Day One, to order at 4:15 p.m. The City Council meeting was audio and video tape-recorded for future reference. Copies are available by request from the City Secretary. Agenda Item#4-A,ZA 00-061, Revised Site Plan for Kirby's Steakhouse ZA 00-061, Revised Site Plan for Kirby's Steakhouse, on property legally described as Lot 9, Block A, Southlake Bank Place, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4546 & 4547, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.00 acres. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. Applicant: Kirby's Steakhouse. Owner: Southlake Investments, L.L.C. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter noted that this site plan proposes approximately 500 square feet of new dining area on the north side of the existing Kirby's Steakhouse and revises the north elevation. Results of these changes include an increase in the interior landscape plantings required with the addition and compliance with building articulation in the Corridor Overlay Zone. Mr. Carpenter noted that four (4) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one response was received. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0 vote) of this item at their meeting of June 22, 2000, subject to Staff Review Summary No. 2, dated June 16, 2000 and granting relief on the additional canopy tree planting and the horizontal articulation on the north wall. Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26,2000 Page 1 of 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Scott Rogers, Richard Ferrara Architect, Inc. 445 East Walnut Street, #131, Richardson, Texas. Mr. Rogers was present to answer questions of Council. PUBIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 00-061, Revised Site Plan for Kirby's Restaurant, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 16, 2000, subject to Item #2 [provide one additional canopy tree in compliance with the required interior landscape requirements]. Motion: Standerfer Second: DuPre Ayes: Standerfer, DuPre, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item#5-A, Ordinance No. 480-346, 1st Readi .g(ZA 00-037) Ordinance No. 480-346, 1st Reading (ZA 00-037), Rezoning on property legally described as Tracts 4G1, and 4H, situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District with a requested zoning of"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter noted that the property was currently undeveloped and heavily wooded. The property is bound on the east by 10 developed residential lots ("SF-20B") on the platted Vista Trails Subdivision. There are three adjacent residences on the west side of the property, on two platted lots ("SF-1B") and one unplatted Tract ("AG"). The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0 vote) at their regular meeting on June 22, 2000. Twenty-four (24) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and one (1) response was received, in favor. Laura Cronin, applicant. Ms. Cronin was present to answer questions of council. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-346, 1st Reading (ZA 00-037). Motion: DuPre Second: Kendall Ayes: DuPre, Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, Potter, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26,2000 Page 2 of 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #5-B, ZA 00-038, Plat Showing for Lots 9 & 10, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition. ZA 00-038, Plat Showing of Lots 9 & 10, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition, on property legally described as Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, LAU Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter noted that this plat proposes two residential lots from an existing tract currently configured as a"flag lot". Each proposed lot contains approximately 2 acres. The property is currently undeveloped and heavily wooded. The property is bound on the east by 10 developed residential lots of the platted Vista Trails Subdivision There are three adjacent residences on the west side of the property, on two platted lots and one unplatted tract. Mr. Carpenter noted that twenty-four(24) notices were sent to pro), ;rty owners within the 200' notification area and two (2) responses were received, one in favor and one undecided. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0 vote) subject to Staff Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, at their regular meeting of June 22, 2000. Motion was made to approve ZA 00-038, subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000; granting the variance requested for the minimum front building line. Motion: DuPre Second: Standerfer Ayes: DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #5-C, Ordinance No. 480-347, 1st Reading(ZA 00-040) Ordinance No. 480-347, 1st Reading (ZA 00-040), Rezoning and Site Plan for Georgetown Park, Phase III, on property legally described as Lot 1R2, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, with a requested zoning of "0-1" Office District. Owner and Applicant: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter noted the property is currently developed with a two-story office building, per a previously approved site plan. All landscaping, parking and other improvements are currently in place. The building is located on an individually platted lot of a larger retail/office complex. This is the southern most lot in the development. The Meadow Oaks Subdivision is located southwest of the property rezoned. Council approved the previous site plan on March 13, 1998. Mr. Carpenter Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26, 2000 Page 3 of 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL noted that nine (9) notices sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and two responses were received, in favor. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0 vote) at their regular meeting of June 22, 2000. The record reflected that the applicant is rezoning to the "0-1" Office District in order to seek a Specific Use Permit for the addition of a carport. In order to seek a rezoning in the Corridor Overlay Zone, the applicant must present a site plan with any proposed improvements; therefore, a site plan has been submitted showing the carport location. Steve Isbell, Capital Realty, Grapevine, Texas. Mr. Isbell answered questions for Council regarding the carport. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-347, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-040), and Site Plan for Lot 1R3, Georgetown Park, Phase III, subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 16, 2000. Motion: Standerfer • Second: DuPre ;.- Ayes: Standerfer, DuPre, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #2-A,Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that the City Council would be going into Executive Session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.086, to seek legal advise from our City Attorney; to deliberate regarding real property matters; to deliberate regarding a prospective gift; to deliberate regarding personnel matters; to deliberate regarding security devices; and/or to deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. Council adjourned into executive session at 4:35 p.m. Council returned to open session at 6:50 p.m. [Mayor Stacy was not present for the executive session during deliberations regarding real property] Agenda Item #2-B,Action Necessary/Executive Session Motion was made that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract for sale with Harold Knight and J.L. Clow for the purpose of right-of-way necessary for intersection improvements at State Highway 114 and North White Chapel Boulevard for the amount discussed during the executive session. Motion: DuPre Second: Standerfer Ayes: DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, and Shankland. Nays: None Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26,2000 Page 4 of 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Abstention: Stacy Approved: 6-0-1 vote Motion was made to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract of sale with Town and Country Food Stores for the purchase of right-of-way necessary for intersection improvements at State Highway 114 and White Chapel Boulevard for the amount discussed in executive session. Motion: DuPre Second: Standerfer Ayes: DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, and Shankland Nays: None Abstention: Stacy Approved: 6-0-1 vote Motion was made to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract of sale with DFW/White Chapel 2 Ltd., for the purchase of right-of-way necessary for intersection . .improvements at State Highway 114 and White Chapel Boulevard for the amou rt discussed in executive session. Motion: DuPre Second: Standerfer Ayes: DuPre, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, and Shankland Nays: None Abstention: Stacy Approved: 6-0-1 vote Agenda Item #5-D, Mid-Year Budget Review Director of Finance Sharen Elam presented the mid-year financial review for the first eight months of the fiscal year 2000. The mid-year review focuses on receipts from October 1999 through May 2000 and how the total relates to the amount budgeted. Included in the report was a copy of the General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ending on May 2000. Ms. Elam also included the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period which ended May 2000. A copy of the information presented is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Agenda Item #5-E, Ordinance No. 756-A, 1st Reading, Revisions to the FY99-00 Budget. Ordinance No. 756-A, 1st Reading, was presented to the City Council to reflect the proposed mid-year changes to the Adopted FY 1999-2000 Budget. She noted there were only three (3) divisions proposing an increase as outlined in the information presented, however, in total the proposed FY 1999-2000 budget reflects a decrease in revenues and expenditures of$134,853 and $630,965 respectively. It is anticipated that fund integrity will be maintained, as the expenditure adjustments reflect the general fund balance at Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26,2000 Page 5 of 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 15.3%. This is within the adopted Fund Balance Policy, which states a minimum balance of 15% and an optimum balance of 25%. Motion was made to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 756-A, Revisions to the FY 99-00 Budget. Motion: Fawks Second: Potter Ayes: Fawks, Potter,Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, Standerfer, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Agenda Item #6,Adjournment Mayor Rick Stacy adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary A:\SPEC-CC-MIN-6-26-00..doc Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 26,2000 Page 6 of 6 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM • July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Lauren Safranek, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-72, Amending the Employee Handbook to Include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy. Action Requested: Consideration of Resolution No. 00-72, approving the amendment of the employee handbook to include the worker's compensation wage continuation policy. Backgro ;nd Information: This policy ensures that all City employees, who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake, are afforded the protections guaranteed by the worker's compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition to the legally required benefits, the City provides a wage continuation program, which offers supplemental earnings to employees receiving worker's compensation benefits from the City. • Worker's compensation income benefitsprovide an employee with P approximately 70% of their monthly earnings if loss time results from an on-the-job injury. This policy supplies wage continuation benefits to an employee to provide the employee with their normal "take-home" pay while unable to work due to an occupational injury or disease. An employee would be eligible for wage continuation for up to 90 days. If after 90 days the employees has not been released by the treating physician to return to full or light duty, the employee may supplement their worker's compensation income benefits with sick leave, vacation leave, or compensatory leave to provide the employee with their normal "take-home" pay. Currently, there is not a policy that regulates wage continuation benefits. However, the practice has been to provide wage continuation to an employee for the entire time they are losing time due to an on-the-job injury. This practice provides little incentive for an employee to do what is necessary to return to work as quickly as possible. This policy provides the City with some avenues to reinforce to the employee the need to follow the physician's treatment program and to maintain communication with the City regarding improvement and changes. Most cities provide • wage continuation for 30-60 days. This policy is for 90 days because this time frame will generally coincide with Family Medical Leave time, and 5B-1 Billy Campbell July 14, 2000 Page Two the elimination period for the long-term disability benefits provided for employees by the City. Financial Considerations: Adopting a worker's compensation wage continuation policy does not have financial implications. Citizen Input: Not Applicable Board Review: Not Applicable. Legal Review: The attorneys have reviewed the policy and addressed any legal issues pertaining to the worker's compensation wage continuation policy. Alternatives: The alternatives are to not adopt a policy. Supporting Documents: A copy of the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy and Resolution 00-72. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends placing this item on the July 18th, City Council meeting agenda. 5B-2 RESOLUTION NO. 00-72 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS, AMENDING THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK TO INCLUDE THE WORKER'S COMPENSATION WAGE CONTINUATION POLICY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City including the preparation of personnel policies; and WHEREAS, according to the City of Southlake (the "City") Charter section 4.14(9) personnel rules are subject to the approval of Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager recognizes the need to update, revise, or add policies to reflect changes in laws or City practice; and WHEREAS, the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy accomplishes the purposes described above in a manner that accommodates the legitimate interests of the City, now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, THAT: Section 1: The City of Southlake hereby amends the personnel policies to include the Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation policy. Section 2: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary 5B-3 City of Southlake Personnel Policies Topic: Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Section: Rules and Regulations Effective Date: Approved BY: Revision Date: 1.0 Purpose— It is the policy of the City of Southlake that all regular and temporary City employees who are injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City of Southlake be afforded the protections guaranteed by the Worker's Compensation laws of the State of Texas. In addition with the legally required benefits, the City provides a wage continuation program, which offers supplemental earnings to employees receiving worker's compensation benefits from the City of Southlake. 2.0 Definitions: 2.1 Injury- Damage or harm to the physical structure of the body or a part thereof, including any subsequent aggravation or re-injury that occurs while the employee is acting in the course and scope of the employee's employment, and for where compensation is payable under the act and is deemed applicable by the insurance carrier. An "injury" shall not include any illness, disease or infection that is not directly caused by the employee's performance on the job. 2.2 Disease— An abnormal condition of an organ or part that impairs normal physiological functioning, as a result of infection, inherent weakness, or environmental stress as deemed applicable by the insurance carrier. 2.3 First Report of Injury — The Report provides information on the employee claimant, employer, insurance carrier and medical practitioner necessary to begin the claims process. The Act, requires an Employer's First Report of Injury or Illness (TWCC-1) to be filed with the injured worker's insurance carrier, and the injured claimant or the claimant's representative within eight (8) days after the employee's absence from work or receipt of notice of occupational disease. 2.4 Texas Worker's Compensation Act (the Act) — Chapter 401 et seq of the Texas Labor Code, as amended. 2.5 Wage Continuation— A City benefit is designed to provide an employee with the employee's approximate normal "take-home" pay while unable to work due to occupational injury or disease. 5B-4 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 5 2.6 Subrogation Rights - To recover benefits paid to the employee that are received by the employee for injuries incurred as the result of the negligence of a third party. 2.7 Income Benefits -Benefits that equal 70% of the difference between the employee average weekly wage and the employees weekly wage after the injury. An employee becomes eligible for income benefits on the eighth day of disability. 3.0 Statutory Benefits: 3.1. TWCC Benefits- An employee who sustains an injury at work may be eligible to receive benefits prescribed by the Act. These benefits include income benefits, medical benefits as reasonably required to cure and relieve the effects of the injury or occupational diseases, and/or death benefits. 3.2. Calculation of TWCC Benefits- State law currently provides that an employee will be eligible for weekly indemnity payments beginning on the eighth calendar day of lost time following an occupational injury. Weekly indemnity payments for compensable injuries are temporary benefits, which will continue until the doctor certifies that the employee has received maximum medical improvement. Weekly indemnity payments for compensable injuries are made in accordance with state law. 3.3 TWCC Benefits Waiting Period- Compensation benefits are subject to qualifications and a seven (7) calendar day waiting period. After 28 calendar days of lost time, and subject to qualifications, the seven-day (7) waiting period will be paid retroactively. 4.0 Wage Continuation Program: 4.1 Start Time for Wage Continuation Benefits- As worker's compensation benefits provide nothing to an employee during the first seven (7) calendar days, wage continuation will provide the employee with his or her regular pay for that period. Should an employee miss 28 or more calendar days due to occupational injury and receive payment for the first seven (7) days, the City will recoup the amount of this payment through payroll deduction. 4.2. Maximum Time for Wage Continuation Benefits- Subject to the provisions outlined below, an employee who sustains an injury in the course and scope of employment and who is eligible for Worker's Compensation benefits, shall be eligible for wage continuation benefits, separate and distinct from and in addition to worker's compensation payments. Wage continuation benefits shall automatically terminate at the expiration of 90 calendar days from the date the employee is first unable to work. In special cases deemed meritorious by the City Manager, such as an employee's application for disability benefits is 5B-5 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 6 pending, wage continuation benefits may be continued for up to an additional 30 calendar days. In no event will wage continuation benefits extend past 120 calendar days for any injury, including any later aggravation, relapse, or re- injury. Upon exhaustion of wage continuation benefits, refer to additional benefits described herein. 4.3 Use of Accrued Leave- Once wage continuation benefits have been exhausted, the employee may begin, at his or her option, to use vacation, sick, and compensatory leave to supplement Income Benefits to provide the employee with the equivalent of their "take-home pay", until the employee is released for full-time or restricted duty. After all vacation, sick and compensatory leave have been exhausted, the employee will receive only the worker's compensation income benefits until he or she is released for regular or restricted duty. 5.0 Qualifications to Receive Wage Continuation Benefit 5.1 Reporting On-the-Job Injury- Any employee who sustains any on-the-job injury, however minor, and who is physically able, must report the injury immediately as the injury is noticed or by the end of the work shift to the employee's immediate supervisor and receive such medical treatment as may be necessary. If the injured employee is unable to physically report his/her injury, it is the responsibility of their immediate supervisor to make the on-the-job injury report as soon after the injury as possible. 5.2 Temporary and Seasonal Employees- Temporary and seasonal employees are eligible for Wage Continuation Benefits for the first seven (7) days of lost time in which Income Benefits are not paid. They are eligible for Worker's Compensation payments. 5.3 Income Benefits - An employee must be receiving income benefits from the City's worker's compensation insurance provider to be eligible for wage continuation. 5.4 Wage Continuation Benefits After Notice of Retirement or Resignation- An employee who is injured after giving notice of retirement or resignation or after receiving notice that the employee is to be laid off or discharged shall not receive and shall not be eligible for wage continuation benefits beyond the date the retirement, discharge, resignation, or layoff is to be effective. 5.5 Examination by City Physician- The City Manager or his designee may require an injured employee, in addition to medical treatment secured by the employee under worker's compensation laws, to submit to examination and treatment at City expense by a physician or psychologist chosen or approved by the City of Southlake as a condition of receiving or continuing to receive wage continuation benefits. 5B-6 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 7 5.6 Restricted duty - An employee who is injured must accept restricted duty assignments if cleared and authorized by the employee's attending physician. Restricted duty assignments are given to the injured employee if available. The duties will accommodate the injury of the employee to prevent further irritation of the injury. 6.0 Release and Subrogation of City Rights: 6.1 Release to Return to Work- Before reporting back to work, an employee must provide a written release to his or her supervisor from the attending physician. The release should indicate the employee's fitness to return to duty, stipulate the type of duty permitted, specify any physical restrictions, and the date of the employee's release from medical care. The employee's supervisor shall forward this release to the Human Resources Department. 6.2 Subrogation Rights of City-The City has subrogation rights ;ranted by law or contract for other benefits, including worker's compensation. Therefore, the City shall be subrogated to the rights of the injured employee or the employee's beneficiary as a third party to the extent of the injured employee's wage continuation benefit payments paid to the employee under this policy. 7.0 Ineligibility and Wage Continuation Benefit Termination: An employee may forfeit all rights to initial and/or further wage continuation benefits if the employee: A. fails or refuses to comply with, follow, disregard, or violate the treating physician's instructions regarding treatment and/or rehabilitation of the employee's injury. B. refuses to perform restricted, partial, or part-time duty when offered by the City of Southlake and which has been authorized by the treating physician. C. refuses to accept or perform a different job with the City when offered by the City Manager and which has been authorized by the treating physician. D. falsifies or misrepresents the employee's physical condition or capacity. E. refuses to return to duty on the workday they have been released by the treating physician. F. fails to contact the employee's immediate supervisor weekly, and notify the division head of the employee's condition and expected return to work date. This must continue until a physician's statement is received which states or estimates the period of time the employee will be unable to perform duty. In addition, each time the employee sees a doctor for consultation or 5B-7 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 8 treatment, the employee must submit a progress report from the physician to the employee's department head and the Human Resources Department. G. has been injured as a result of the employee's blatant disregard for customary and established safety policies, procedures, or instructions as determined by the employee's Department Director or City Manager as a result of an investigation into the facts. H. is found to be working, either part-time or full-time and either for pay or as a volunteer or otherwise, for or on behalf of himself or herself or any other person, firm or corporation, or any other person, firm or corporation, or any other employer. I. retires, dies, resigns, or is discharged for any reason while receiving wage continuation benefits. J. is injured as the result of the employee's violation of any Federal, State or local law, ordinance or statute. K. Worker's Compensation income benefit terminates. L. fails to keep medical appointments or refuses to submit to an examination or to such diagnostic test, x-rays, surgical procedures, or other as a physician or psychologist prescribes or recommends as medically necescary to identify, diagnose, treat, or cure the employee's injured condition. M. is injured: 1. while engaged in horseplay; 2. intoxicated by alcohol, controlled substances, glue, dangerous drugs, aerosol paint; or similar substances; 3. in willful efforts by employee to injure self; 4. by an act of a third person to injure for personal reasons other than through workplace violence; 5. through an act of God (tornado, flood, etc.), unless employment leads to more exposure to risk than the general public; 6. through voluntary participation in off-duty recreational or social activities; or 7. while participating in activities that would be detrimental to recovery or refusing to participate in activities that will aid in healing. 8.0 Sick Leave/Vacation Accrual: Sick leave and vacation benefits will continue to accrue at the normal rate for an employee who is receiving wage continuation benefits for a maximum of 90 days. 5B-8 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 9 After 90 days of leave, an employee will discontinue accruing vacation and sick leave. 9.0 Coordination With Long-Term Disability (LTD): If an employee's worker's compensation leave fulfills the waiting period for LTD benefits, then the employee may apply for LTD benefits. LTD benefits will coordinate with the worker's compensation benefits, and the Wage Continuation program. At no time will the employee's total compensation exceed the employee's salary prior to the work-related injury. 5B-9 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 10 RETURN TO DUTY OR RESTRICTED DUTY PHYSICIAN'S STATEMENT City of Southlake Name of Employee Date of Birth Title of Employee This statement is to determine the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements of his or her position. Please review the attached job description and indicate the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements of the job. If it is determined that the employee may perform the physical requirements with a reasonable accommodation, please indicate the necessary accommodation. This statement will be used to determine the employee's ability to safety and consistently perform the physical requirements of his or her job which may include enforcing and assisting with the safety and security of the public. This information will remain confidential. The employee's app-oval for the release of this information is indicated on the attached form. Diagnosis of injury/disease Nature of treatment(including surgery and medications prescribed, if any) Please indicate the employee's ability to perform the physical requirements indicated below: Please complete all unless indicated by N/A on the frequency line. Frequency Duration Lifting or carrying 50 lbs.? Lifting or carrying 50- 100 lbs. Bending or stooping? Reaching above shoulder level? Driving equipment/vehicles? Operating heavy machinery? Working with machinery? Climbing ladders, stairs,etc.? Jumping/Stepping off equipment at heights up to 3 feet? Walking? Standing? Sitting? Exposure to extreme temperatures or humidity? 5B-10 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 11 • Are there any other physical requirements of the employee's job that the employee cannot safely perform? (see attached job description) What modifications or accommodations can be made to allow this employee to perform the duties of his or her position: Would you certify this employee as able to return to full duty status and perform the physical requirements of his or her position? Yes No If not, when will the employee be able to return to full duty status, if known: Additional comments on the physical aspects of the job (limitations, therapy, etc.): Physician's Signature: Date: Printed/typed name: Address: Phone Number: 5B-11 Worker's Compensation Wage Continuation Policy Page 12 EMPLOYEE'S AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION To Whom It May Concern: I, hereby authorize any hospital, physician, medical (employee's name) practitioner, or medically related facility to disclose or furnish to the City of Southlake any and all information with respect to the illness or injury in question for a release to duty. The information provided to the City of Southlake is to be used solely for the determination of a release to duty, restricted duty or modified work. A photostatic copy of this authorization is to be considered as valid as the original and is effective for the duration of the process. Date Employee's Signature Printed 5B-12 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 13, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works Subject: Approval of Change Order No. 2 for Work at Town Hall Action Requested: Approve change order No. 2 for work to be done at Town Hall. Background Information: The Audio Visual (A/V) portion of this project is currently underway and staff expects that bid notices will be issued within the next 2 - 3 weeks. The A/V consultant in conjunction with the contractor and city staff, has identified several areas and items of work that need to be done prior to the receipt of bids, in order to coordinate this work with finish work being done. Since we have several walls and ceilings being closed up, it would be advantageous to do this A/V work at this time. Financial Considerations: This Change Order is in the amount of $45,177. This amount is part of the total A/V systems project and is not part of the base building contract. Funding for this item will come from the next set of TIF bonds to be issued; however, funds are available from the existing project funds that have not yet been expended. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Council Member Potter has been working with the A/V consultant and staff on these issues. Legal Reviews: None. Alternatives: "The alternative is to deny this Change Order and have the work done in conjunction with the rest of the A/V work; however, the costs will increase due to the need to remove previously constructed work. 5F-1 R Supporting Documents: Change Order breakdown. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that this item be placed on the July 18 City Agenda for approval. Ron Harper Director of Public Works • 5F-2 Southlake Town Hall - Request For Proposal Audio Visual System 7/14/00 Subcontractor Description of Change j Total University Building Specialties Projection Screens for Court Rm., Exec. Conf. Rm. _ _ $7,853 Bums&Parks Paint Tape, Bed, Paint $1,356 • Mills Electrical Furnish, Install Conduit, Boxes, Speakers $30,376 FCS- Drywall Cut GWB Speaker Holes $1,385 BECK _ Provide Lift for Speaker Installation,Trim Out $2,750 Southwest Blueprint Blueprints $35 Sub-Total $43,755 BECK — Fee @3.25% $1,422 Total $45,177 5F-3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 7, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer's agreement for Gateway Plaza Phase II Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer's agreement for Gateway Plaza Phase II. Background Information: The final plat for Gateway Plaza Phase II Unit 1 was approved on July 6, 2000. The plat includes the dedication of right of way for Nolen Drive from FM 1709 to SH 114 and Lots 1 and 2. This developer's agreement covers the construction of Nolen Drive and the westbound deceleration lane and water and sanitary sewer improvements to serve Gateway Plaza Phase II.. The developer is constructing Nolen Drive between FM 1709 and SH 114 with four travel lanes and a continuous left turn lane. A westbound deceleration lane is also being constructed on FM 1709 at Nolen Drive. The developer is requesting that the Council give them credit on the Roadway Impact Fees for the overwidth construction of Nolen Drive based upon the fact that Nolen Drive is on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan as an arterial which requires a wider street than necessary to serve the Gateway Plaza Phase II development. The other issue is the City's reimbursement for oversize water lines in the form of credit for water impact fees. Financial Considerations: The Roadway Impact Fees are estimated to be approximately $267,226 and the estimate for the cost of the construction of Nolen Drive is approximately $376,980. The cost of the oversized water line is $40,300. The estimate of the water impact fees is approximately $46,400. 5G-1 Citizen Input/ Board Review: On July 10, 2000, the Park Board recommended the following: Credit for the construction of 710 linear feet of public trail eight feet in width along FM 1709 for Gateway Plaza Phases II and III as meeting the park dedication requirements for this development. Mr. Terry Wilkinson of Wyndham Properties, LTD. Committed to the Park Board to keep and maintain an additional 83,237 square feet of open space in Phase II Legal Review: This is the City's standard developer's agreement originally prepared by the City Attorney.. Alternatives: Approve it, deny it or modify it . Supporting Documents: Agreeement Plat Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Please place on the July 18, 2000 City Council for Council consideration and approval. 441" Charlie J. omas City Engineer GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE II ADDITION COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake. Texas, hereinafter referred to as the '`City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". of Gateway Plaza Phase II Addition, hereinafter referred to as "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the Addition (a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City Commercial Developer Agreement 5G-3 1 acceptance of the Addition. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by the City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned herein above which are intended to be public facilities shall be vested in the City, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, the City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire Agreement shall occur at such time that the City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved, and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water , street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; Commercial Developer Agreement `^-4 2 • f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said Addition which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the Addition so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Commercial Developer Agreement-5 3 • The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES A. ON-SITE WATER The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the Director of Public Works, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA and TNRCC requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. 5G-6 Commercial Developer Agreement 4 C. STREETS The street construction in the Addition will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the Director of Public Works. 1. The Developer will be responsible for: • a) Installation and two year operation of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; or an agreement with utility provider stating that no charge will be made for street lights for the two-year duration. b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the Addition, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means, the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 2. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. 5G-7 Commercial Developer Agreement 5 It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. E. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this Addition. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the Addition. 5G-8 Commercial Developer Agreement 6 F. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans to be stamped "Released for Construction" by the Director of Public Works must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer Agreement must be executed. Commercial Developer Agreement 5G-9 7 5. The Developer, or Contractor, shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co- insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub-Contractors. Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. 5G-10 Commercial Developer Agreement 8 C. Approval by the Director of Public Works or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the Director of Public Works signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This Agreement or any part herein, or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his or her own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. Commercial Developer Agreement 9 5G-11 F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election. draw down on the performance bond. letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense: provided, however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. ROADWAY IMPACT FEES The City will credit the Roadway Impact Fees to the developer for Gateway Plaza Phase II Unit 1 and 2 for the construction of Nolen Drive between FM 1709 and SH 114 which is on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan as an Arterial Street. The estimated cost of Nolen Drive is approximately $376,980 and the Roadway Impact Fees are estimated to be approximately $267,226. B. OFF-SITE SEWER N/A C. OFF SITE WATER The City will reimburse the developer for the oversize of the 8" water line to a 12" water line by providing the developer with a credit to the water impact fee for Gateway Plaza Phase II Unit 1 and 2 in the amount of$40,300. D. PARK FEES Gateway Plaza Phases II and III are a 37.56 acre non-residential development. The required land dedication for this development is 0.94 acres or $30,048 in fees in lieu of land dedication. Per Park Board recommendation the City accepts credits for the construction of seven hundred and ten linear feet (710') of public trail eight feet (8') in width for Gateway Plaza Phases II and III (Tracts A, B, and C) as meeting the park dedication requirements for this development. Mr. Terry Wilkinson of Wyndham Properties, ltd.. committed to the Parks and Recreation Board to keep and maintain an additional open space in Phase II (Tracts B and C) of the development. E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE Commercial Developer Agreement io 5G-12 E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address: STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public Commercial Developer Agreement 5G_♦ 3 ]1 VI My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: Commercial Developer Agreement 5 G_14 12 REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1 . T ne Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letters of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. Commercial Developer Agreement 5G-15 13 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 11, 2000 TO: Charlie Thomas. City Engineer FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Recommended Park Dedication Requirements — Gateway Plaza Phases II and III, Tracts A, B and C At their July 10, 2000 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Board considered the park dedication requirements for credits and fees in lieu of park land dedication for Gateway Plaza, Phases (I and III, a 37.56 acre non- residential development. The required land dedication for this development is 0.94 acres or $30,048 in fees in lieu of land dedication. Section 7.05 (A)(1) of the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance states the following: "The City Council shall, upon recommendation by the Park Board, determine the applicability of a developer's payment of fees in lieu of the land dedication requirements of this section." ■ The petitioner, Wyndham Properties, Ltd., requested consideration of the following park dedication credits for Gateway Plaza, Phase II: 1. Construction costs for five hundred and sixty-five linear feet (565') of public trail eight feet (8') in width, totaling $11,300. 2. Credit for 83,237 square feet of private open area exceeding the required landscape islands and bufferyards, valued at $10.00 per square foot, totaling$416,185. The Parks and Recreation Board voted 6-0 to approve a recommendation to accept credits for the construction of seven hundred and ten linear feet (710') of public trail eight feet (8') in width for Gateway Plaza Phases II and III (Tracts A, B, and C) as meeting the park dedication requirements for this development. Mr. Terry Wilkinson of Wyndham Properties, Ltd. committed to the Parks and Recreation Board to keep and maintain the additional open space in Phase II (Tracts B and C) of the development. Please contact me if you have further questions. Please note that Section 7.07 of the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance specifies that the recommended park dedication assessment by the Parks and Recreation Board is subject to the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the City Council, and is dependent upon the number of dwelling units (residential) or developed acreage (non-residential). Therefore the above recommendation is subject to change dependent upon further review of a particular development or changes to the proposed development that affects the fee criteria, if any. KH CC: Malcolm Jackson, Chief of Building Services Bruce Payne, Director of Planning 5G-16 • . .• LO 0 el) POINT Or ,;=, HAYIIIC SCALE BAVINNINC sr..Tr H/GNWAY N. I/4 .4.............r...., ....z....„....aa____ &rat arm fir eN9 . ....Al 1 I'\........... CIN $Yob•a.al. ZS"' 7. lifli-e--- ... . g:44117--- eoy---",:jfarleto- ,- Ma' .•.1..."Clt.",:«7:: ....•swam,0013•111.011•01, C..0.•••••4.4/0•60 .1 Sti ---et..., - --,iii -.,:t.ci•. S 14 - 1g C .. !• A, • i.. I 1 k—ars-1 , I (2 I ro,c1 I LOI Z MOO(1 "AM SAONE fal . • 114.1/01 ACIITS . 1:1 il : I- "rl IN 0 MOW I •••...00.0414•1010. a•10. A i '. ua.a.0.4,1••••• it Op1' 4 1.1 I o a' ' I I PALL. VG. 1 14 c-i "I ii ..J I , .‘ 568.••G. i I I i • 1.. 11' •(f 1°9 OF' •-,::::: i I i I f.• qo ii- I 511 1 ii / tzw.r COI CA4 1 • 1 0 .41,-rfICwr.".477:: > • . , •, 0• (fa . • ///I 1 4 I a G. IN.Aft.•0 Cy! iefzx = I roma Aro -.0.4.,._ , . GM 4 a.JP.ad ....... ...ii --MN=all.E.---- lo• 4. I 0.e. 3B"' •014.0•09•04/0040.. C") t) 0,14,410,0001... tzfr 00 1..66,•••iy..•**Pe .."7•121.1. ' :„:4 SO II'oar au g Wiiita Mr'arr • 1 c(tC73-. //1 S i' I 4 " pricy ,I/ 6 ' mew WON., .IIII APES •• ,"....... . a.Vail Pa I " ttt: '7:'......."7,..•:7;;Vr. ..14. - - "am- ......—,....--......... ....—.......—... 1....alen=aasi....../a.....U.--/4 _ 1..... ••-•---7,-cf-- „,•.v..,. ---,.... IP I ate 40.41 a 4000,041 10 laws••••I 4 , rr..r.raro.op . ' k sir aft.....aos wore ..q.,. /P kys............ U.,••••••••••..yaw.. h .,••.000 rI104.0, • 14; t 1 I 1 I -...1111I 1401 NMI. S4"•Vr••=01213S 41001110 - ....,1 '---....._•-.."..e..., • 4• / I : . -:J.", ::-..... -"-•---- /gi • [4 i ICI rkC1 36 4 1 II' Cl eV.0440••••• (us 10..au.ou • i 10. UV 1.4 mom• I ...,.. 6.1.7k#yy• 1 '0(10$Sp' yr., • / I 141 I 440 '...66, •-re4r ....... / 1 1 `Ltetrar.... . OW.:Ler QM .1,,,, / .:: .il Ir."? • il ...,..... .... 1 .1111•14 I'/MSS% ,I ='''......... . .... t..--..... OAS. ....... ,,,,.. ..,$-N. rtirilrix., Rim) .II IN 1 2 2000 i 1 1 .Ati ,I SIMS . 1, '....".. ' '"............ 4'44810. 11 Ll I— .....;.• 0 41 1 I MI"l 101 .10 -....... N. li / . Ayer= II P%or•ao.artZ i '..... .4 '' olilli. 11 * • 1 1 *I iqi / re'lit OP GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE UNIT 1 i / i. oOtt) BLOCK 1, LO2S I &2 Die as•ITIP POWS IN 0 Yeury',..yy THOMAS LIMA sugar,LLSTAICT OW 4r4 .421011 MAP .11 SSW An AnitC1 S.iieskiAN sugar.MISTRALT MG tali CITY Of SOUTIAPPC.YUMMY COUNTY nugis 2 IlITS d.1.• fa A/PIMA.PT MS MINIM 1 SPIIIII0 CIIIIIIISSION CITY CASS No. IA oo-ISO n fliarf WI MINS IP.•••• ..1. ..., •••••••••S = C00401104, Prwonry non.,,,,.LTD WNW I.MAW All.NIP an SCCATTAIIT *CI E rasa ta Warm ,ANS ,IPTY— yy y yorn......pas yyr ay soy ......ar 40 Ia.. lam ale.4.ar 1.41 los 4.0 1g el) ..•,XI. a. Al,,II y CrCI = __ _---------ro•---'4- . ._ ..._.______________. .1.-. r) . . City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-053 PROJECT: Tract 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706 ORDINANCE NO: 480-348 REQUEST: James E. Glover is requesting to rezone 2.86 acres from "AG" to "SF-1A" ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading of the rezoning request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Ordinance No. 480-348 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-053 5H City of Southlake, Texas fp BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: James E. Glover PROPERTY SITUATION: This is a 2.86-acre tract set approximately 450' east of the North Peytonville Avenue right-of-way. There is an existing 50' road easement serving this lot, and the developed residential lots to the south and west of this tract. The Coventry Manor subdivision(PUD#7) is located along the eastern boundary of this tract. The property to the north and west of this tract are zoned"SF1- A". The property to the south is zoned "AG". HISTORY: This parcel is contiguous to the east of the Burger Addition which was platted in 1980 creating a one acre lot as a"gift of love." It is our understanding that Mr. Burger owned the platted lot and the unplatted parcel under consideration, which he sold to Mr. Glover in 1997. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3H situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 2.86 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District NOTICES: Nine (9) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a concept plan review by staff. Staff is currently processing a plat of this tract (ZA00-054). N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-053Z.doc I Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-053 5H Page 1 A w Vicinity Map Tr 3H, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706 IMIN.-44 III ..■'111■V111_ ... I■ .11111111AIIIIVRIMIVAIII1 ir IM !Apo_ \\,\ Li. ' 1.11_ .. f,•.i. l_i g_4_i‘ t"A. __ MM4 . I II . .-.-:-i- .....,. . - 11lI�II�pAIh ■`�,�j n�r!T.im-` ,1 �RA j 1 r1��1 .51. 111111EMIll A/Amu-pm Adam i _ nriii-r-truri—jrzasstal- reef' .: n_ R,AlreFORPM: ik_uoargo 11.1.prim kii.,7.- iii LI , Eidu W. Vkiwariimiilm...,4.a.*v,_EL.amI.-iu-P•Si■m Wi I ►• �•1 .■.�I a■■22 ,rL,. im _=k.0 IN =PI Frfrilliblumma r,or Ara NI Milli0 nss.... .ft wo . IR tx,-.4.4,,,,,calm.„......pr, It. No e , awl -.. IA muarejor ant 1.'4. il0111117":"I‘Poi m , ipir NE.'s ._ — es 1011.4(0,4inii 2 - : ----I IN itat 13:4 _ ►n im 0 unidel -1.���-waygit► r4.04.}. c•N�II■►��est■� IIL!Vtii.: Er_ itimi •......1 n..-;I. .. erg■/pffitym.'..irz 3.„-ff Ammar7 4`ik,„,jil `����\� RII D���7 'MENNE=Mg!131;1"a:14A*ir 94 roppi*,•_ ipmmilIALUdaillil& imi IIIN, Aum - r4E--eA e� .�. I...�� .*.: L u.[D ■ Fq*bilr - 2000 0 2000 Feet N A W / � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-053 5H Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-348 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3H SITUATED IN THE THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.86 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 3 V amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 3H situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 2.86 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from"AG"Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 4 s among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 5 violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: • Tract I: Lot A-R, Block 1, PURGER ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1516, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Tract II: Being a lot, tract or parcel of land in the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin found, said point being, by deed call, East 24.0 feet, South 1585.7 feet and North 89 degrees 20 minutes 30 seconds East 445.95 feet from the Northwest corner of said T. M. Hood Survey, said point also being the Northeast corner of said Lot A-R, Block 1, Burger Addition; THENCE South, at 281.96 feet a 1/2" iron pin found at the Southeast corner of said Lot A-R, in all 306.96 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner; THENCE East, 397.37 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set for corner; • THENCE North 02 degrees 07 minutes 56 seconds East 311.88 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner;, THENCE South 89 degrees 20 minutes 30 seconds West 409.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.86 acres of land, more or less and being the same tract of land recorded in volume 6024, Page 608, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. • TOGETHER WITH THE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ALL PURPOSES. 7%, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-053 5H Page 8 City of Southlake, Texas t STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-054 PROJECT: Request for Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance associated with the Plat for Lot 17, T.M. Hood No. 706 Addition REQUEST: James E. Glover is requesting a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, § 8.01 A to allow a lot not abutting a public or private street. ACTION NEEDED: Consider a variance request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (F) Developer Comments (G) 11"xl7"Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-054 5I City of Southlake, Texas I BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: James E. Glover PROPERTY SITUATION: This request for a variance is associated with the plat showing for proposed Lot 17, T. M. Hood, No. 706 addition. This is a 2.86-acre tract set approximately 450' east of the North Peytonville Avenue right-of-way. There is an existing 50' road easement serving this lot, and the developed residential lots to the south and west of this tract. Coventry Manor (PUD#7) is located along the eastern boundary of this tract. The property to the north and west of this tract are zoned"SF1-A". The property to the south is zoned "AG". LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3H situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 2.86 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District NOTICES: No notices required STAFF COMMENTS: A one-lot plat showing application was submitted to the city for review. One- lot plat showings are approved administratively by staff. Due to the lot not abutting a public or private street, the applicant must seek a variance, which can only be approved by city council. Case No. ZA00-053 is the associated zoning case for this same tract. The Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, § 8.01 A, states: Every lot shall abut on a public or private street. This tract is served by the 50' road easement abutting North Peytonville Road and extends 450' back to the proposed lot. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-054PS.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-054 5I Page 1 , i Vicinity Map Lot 17, T.M. Hood No. 706 Addition ua ■V. 4 � . f file' •41 Willi — "' L Ifillill i lill : 1 ITZEIraill ir mot ;wows BB., w_, / Vela—�W ' iiii: Inlik„lmm7 . fir:■■o �iin!('ximmumi lTpr m. �j,oi Er) ,7l wi'I��rlp.,4, R,fteili,�.,ot:ionimmir alir :i_%III 11.is I ' I pmwili;nilEmil z 3; 'Tj♦ ■t► �::7 •arm�7rt�!!�u■:ate/1• 7■■■ Immo ii ►��wEMI ' j . ��rCminwrou-,.. ,okommi,„.= .. .....;.-4__ raireilk ►:E:C�mEIN .� mellill ilkn i- '_ HEM 1■ ..., .,,,,r.4 ill _ �r for/►�/r'101.441116. t 'r,,,,f,„" glibill 21 Im. :: OE.2mbikir.wmunnew',4"0 pi ii-- -imoi Mimi twar mirAlmanwr --voi Fi'--- f.,4,4 . III!! iI� .■lfliiC .■ � � e��sommllDrrn7,�mill , . ,71,mph;WWI � � ■..■ a.■s/\/1 �e . v. �711i n i '� 0/ffre� ♦`` 4/1►t42■�7 .:ji ST U,''.p� u Arinillig I; ge/ Rs I'll': eI ?O; � v � iiirr4i-es.i Emma. ate=r ofilm ipm I'l �►,ta37., �_. ' .�i.���.� dill► ;�� t����nR�►4�.�/��'�I,■�� ■■■i►`�I■■■ imans moung pm iiiirl 2000 0 2000 Feet N At........._ W -, \ E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-054 51 Page 1 ftell - -en I1;> iz a A sr COMFY as 11..s OF WOW Iz Woe o era.of bowl oaralal b In I IL Flood An,Nob.llo.Mk Oa Counly. l......,r,....r..,,�..�..,.._....,.t mot.�,.., - . ram w,. M m . M.. Wow w MW wY..rot rP.AYm.m..l,m•bT. � . rs��m�.may M.�ter!w Uww 4 9Y.�,i5 n0.I,ma tw.. .4,m iY.,an oaf aw tows iWA.a „0. / I.... Mod mast s a Ko• w.le•y gy rote.mne.rm.m >u em .r nioMm.i/Y ar..,mw i.e..rm a.q Y.m /,'rm.a...a np..¢n.....a AI...a o VI ft.roe..a.m...w k .A Ira r Irr2.0 maltbo of earl .. n.M. tat.-+totmc.> . to 7ICORTY YAP ��fGwGG rut.O.YC PM.WA h uR PROM, COYRNTR7 utlt w`' MOO Ma a'.m�sot a Oa bro r rot...F..Aa Oa., m lal rit ND.*4 r.mor..r.r baron ar raw or murk brtrw rotr ..•own II.u•aka rrokl BM riot:...We.ra rootrs Pars a•r ram a fma goat MIMIC SCAM I MN...tr•bra u.tr t..b mr rr r., s— • I›. P.O.B. . .r Cmorortrt AW r.r ' r- ---- �- R -/�_v I --------- WOK A..*dr. .1w4 we...mots gyp'.. i i ,�/ Ara a .rw ta..mr m ot•m mr i _ :. ,"t/ov r gym_ as A� - y .r.r trrrrr.. I I V 9: 0 r rot s It p F- u s�` k STATE OF TEXAS Z t0'[A-R . --------- OOONTY OF TARRANT we I .,..mot..,«...m.....-�...•tot. >m...m um",To... rtt.S O srr m to prowl.... km. I _ �y «........m........m,Prot. ..Prot.,m.Plot_. 11.1..pr..,of Poplar 0 of na Or,of Oa..eras ora*al 11.01r iscralas. --------------- J, ...ore maa mo or.m,.w..m..w OK nrr .71 -=rr.rot. .�.... ... MAW 110,001111.IVlt r.n iILA Plot rr... S�0 LOT 17 ,O6 /c�Z._�,00"D 5 tj T.M. HOODMa. NO. 706r �1 A� R, �, ADDITION �00 • � t e i r V !`; 0 2000 rm.noon SURVEYA-706 ....,.mot........r rARRAN'rcoumr.7SAS Mb gy. .3. .1= -"••••••.. urorm n TB Kum. .sonic COWES= - ---.r m CRT v e,u+mAa —� MORN CtCd'= A7 cm r= fD11.11. /.I..,, l 1 City of Southiake, Texas f PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-054 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 06/12/00 Project Name: Plat Showing, - Lot 17, T. M. Hood No. 706 Addition, being 2.86 acres out of the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No 706 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: James E. Glover James H. Dowdy Land Surveyors, Inc. 1355 N. Peytonville Ave. 6850 Manhattan Blvd, #310 Southiake, TX 76092 Fort Worth, TX 76120 Phone: 817-488-6590 Phone: 817-429-9898 Fax: 817-488-6790 Attn: James E. Glover Fax: 817-429-7676 Attn: Danny Woods CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/30/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. 1. Every lot shall abut on a public or a private street(Ordinance No. 483, § 8.01 A)) The existing tract and proposed lot do not abut a street meeting city standards. Access to this lot is provided by a 50' private road easement. (Variance Requested) 2. Approval of this lot is subject to appropriate zoning change approval. Lot must conform to zoning district regulations. 3. The following changes are needed in the owner's dedication and notary and certifications: a. Revise the owner's dedication and notary to conform with the standard format as shown in Appendix 1 (Individuals). If the deed is in the husband and wife's names, include both and add to the signature block and notary statement. b. Revise the surveyor's certification to reflect the standard format as shown in Appendix 5. 4. The following changes are needed regarding adjacent properties within 200' to include properties across any adjacent R.O.W.: a. Show and label the name of the record owner& corresponding deed record(volume &page) for all unplatted tracts within 200 feet of this property, including Tract 3, to the south. b. Correctly show the existing easements on the adjoining property, specifically Lot 15, Block 2, Coventry Manor. Provide filing information for Coventry Manor. 5. If the zoning change proposed on this property is approved the existing structures may become non- conforming. The property owner should meet with the Zoning Assistant,Art Wright, in the Planning Department to discuss these issues. Prior to the issuance of a building permit on this lot, some buildings may need to be removed or the owner may seek a variance through the Board of Adjustment. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-054 5I Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas t 6. Add the following notes to the face of the plat: a. The owners of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. b. Remove the Flowage easement note. c. Remove the note regarding "structures exist and are to remain". 7. The following changes are needed regarding easements: a. Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement,provide a 10'U.E. along the interior of the property line. 8. Place the City case number"ZA 00-054" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat. 9. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old red courthouse). There is a service charge of$10 per account for this certificate. For more information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at(817) 884-1103. 10. Provide the following standard approval block on the plat per appendix 9: Approved by the City of Southlake Date: Mayor: City Secretary: * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: James E. Glover VIA FAX: ABOVE Danny Woods, James H. Dowdy Land Surveyors, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-054 5I Page 2 t James E. 1355 North Peytonville Avenue GIOVer Southlake,TX 76092 Phone:(817)488-6590 Fax:(817)488-6790 April 28, 2000 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning 1721 East Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: T.M. Hood Addition, Lot 1-A 1357 Peytonville Avenue, Southlake Plat Showing and Request for Zoning—SF1A Dear Sir or Madam This letter is accompanying an application for zoning change and plat showing on the above referenced parcel. This parcel is accessible to a public street (North Peytonville Avenue) via a fifty foot (50') dedicated road easement. This easement was put in place at the time of original land purchase by James E. Burger, from whom I purchased the property, and was designed and intended to provide ingress and egress access to all of the parcels of land that it services. The parcel location and road easement have been reviewed by the Southlake Fire Marshall, Mr. David Barnes, and the current configuration supplies sufficient space for fire truck turnaround and the parcel in question is within required distance from the closest fire hydrant. The parcel in question has always been a separate parcel and has been taxed by the Tarrant Appraisal District(TAD) as saleable land (TAD PIDN number A706-3H, TAD Account#00003941566)and has a separate street address from the land on which my current home is located. Many years after the original configuration of this property and the placement of the ingress/egress road easement, the City of Southlake adopted a subdivision ordinance requiring a specific amount of road frontage for parcels within the City. I hereby request a variance to this ordinance in order to allow this parcel to be zoned for the potential construction of one (1) single family home. I am in the process of selling this parcel, along with the parcel located at 1355 N. Peytonville Avenue, and the potential owners have expressed an interest in being able to build one single family dwelling on the above referenced 2.85-acre parcel. Sincerely, ,.\ (---\..._______ James E. Glover Property Owner and Applicant Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-054 5I Page 1 • City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-016 PROJECT: Tract 3C1 & a portion of Tract 3C, W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 ORDINANCE NO: 480-342 REQUEST: On behalf of Southlake Associates Limited Partnership, Wilson& Stonaker, LLC is requesting a zoning change from "C-2" Local Neighborhood Commercial to"0-1" Office District. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading of the rezoning request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Ordinance No. 480-342 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-016 7A City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership APPLICANT: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is a vacant lot, located south of the Walgreen's site, west of Carroll High School, north of the Akard Addition, and east of Green Oaks Inc. tree farm. HISTORY: The property was zoned"C-2"Local Neighborhood Commercial on May 21, 1991. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District NOTICES: Five (5) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Total Responses Received Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: May 18, 2000; Approved (6-0). CC ACTION: June 20, 2000; Approved (7-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that this request is being made by the applicant to fulfill a commitment made to the City Council during the consideration of the Site Plan for Walgreen's, Case No. ZA 99-103. The applicant has requested deferral of the required Concept Plan/Site Plan required for the change of zoning. If this deferral is granted, a Site Plan approval shall be required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-016Znew.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-016 7A Page 1 - Vicinity Map Tr 3C1 & a portion of Tr 3C W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 � I I I Ijaim.46104`,"rAmmunk g miskj.4.-..tiolimuir -vie,--..... 4--ND Plini illmatel,11111111.6 Mall Mild , .p r,wo ► eitIb u.Rmi -.t1 ►��1i111 � 11• .a rrrrr,;,,;;Iliffi'` IV i '^ Eli��::.N ���iY��±(i��A��� '�c� ,'�t�r_411PnifilluV07:*•47-4140g40 VA �:: Malmws.a • i Ili'AIi.I..dItMm„ r..e 86.� ware V._�aMi1 1_, ., 1:aF',I715.."uwllMc_-7P1PI7 mda O I�■■■' : ►Wf%� mac"■ .2J . / E:�- " d illimillimmolmso. %Am caw 011Wilik...ilusimmoutimmihremmi I,I i,l17,--1 /- C.� �Jrl I =1^IS =_� mg t p:. .�■ \-ir. l LIB' 1.I11I1 4r11u0 cra11eVl IA - opv..ial. illusait am wasbA•��ee-O\ ei �r3��■"IL.'� �'' �� ,��� jlit iNumbolop (,-* !s-1/i�11/��� � .��7 /.2 1 — ' If/io : 1 .111..E 1`►i!.../���z*o IAA s e`�t2t . ... 1111E....■■ .'1..:,.... .riUu.■►DR�� ■► ♦ Ipra ( i t'.�a� IFS►rgpir • ' _ m_�■jig; ■11��a 1 �{ri- ti!j 1La� c�!_ T. iip-.An leg=4 h ■ ram:, T��rr,1 7►s5htii as,i♦ in*if +Ir �■■n-� �T�y , /__114?:4 it'■■\■\'♦`-��$ ii1 j u1-a�:1 a �� r'lli �■ 1� Ian 5!rP11.111,0,"V 0�Sj oq \ INK Illir MIMI ...Jae NIP FA III• 11011=0,04400 0.1 44?All'arrr7 .Tmg 2000 0 2000 Feet N / �W E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-016 7A Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-342 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3C1 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3C SITUATED IN THE W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.349 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM"C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-2" Local Retail Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 1 Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 2 who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "0-1" Office District. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 3 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 4 instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 5 ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" TRACT `B' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Being a 1.349 acre tract of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 and being part of two tracts of land conveyed to Conner Lam as recorded by deed in Volume 8118, Page 1160 and Volume 8012, Page 700 and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Highway Monument found at the intersection of the south line of F.M. Highway No. 1709(a variable right-of-way) with the west line of Peytonville Avenue (a variable right-of-way); Thence South 25°03'41" West a distance of 24.59 feet to a 'A inch iron rod set for corner; Thence South O1°03'54" West, along a line 10 feet west of the existing west line of Peytonville Avenue, a distance of 333.90 feet to a 'A inch iron rod set for corner and being the Point of Beginning of this description; Thence South 01°03'54" West, along a line 10 feet west of the existing west line of Peytonville Avenue, a distance of 140.12 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set for corner, Thence South 89°57'47" West, along a common line of said Conner tract and a tract conveyed to Donald and Louise Davis as recorded in Volume 6555, Page 501, a distance of 408.01 feet to a 'A inch iron rod set for corner, Thence North 01°08'50" East, along common lines of said Conner tract and a tract conveyed to W&B Kidd Family L.P. as recorded in Volume 11587,Page 0692, a distance of 147.97 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner; Thence South 88°56'06" East, a distance of 407.73 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 58,746 square feet which is 1.349 acres of land. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-016 7A Page 8 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT • July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-037 PROJECT: Tracts 4G1 & 4H, J. J. Freshour Survey,Abstract No. 521 ORDINANCE NO.: 480-346 REQUEST: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing, are requesting the rezoning of 4.0 acres on the north side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane from "AG" to "SF-1 A". ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct Public Hearing 2. Consider second reading of the rezoning request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Ordinance No. 480-346 0 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning (Ext. 743) tii Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-037 7B City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is currently undeveloped, and heavily wooded. The property is bound on the east by 10 developed residential lots ("SF- 20-B") of the platted Vista Trails Subdivision. There are three adjacent residences on the west side of the property, on two platted lots ("SF-1-B") and one unplatted tract("AG"). HISTORY: According to our records, these parcels have been designated"AG" Agricultural District since the property was annexed in July 1958. No previous development of this property appears to have occurred. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NOTICES: Twenty-four(24) were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area 1 Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0) at their regular meeting of June 22, 2000. COUNCIL ACTION: June 26, 2000; Approved (6-0) First Reading. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a concept plan review by staff. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-037Z.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-037 7B Page 1 f Vicinity Map Tr. 4G1 & 4H J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 hal"! Av;;M-Hi- 11i1lFl,ir„a„lLki.i f u 1r • MI ;; iP in 11'.lAi_..1.11E.i1l1l.il.1liFfA A1s31Tff.I 11 i.I11d1 i Iirif.rz.it.,A''.'-v n4617r, 41AM CITY OF KELLER ar '" -� _ =�rr • F •: 1 ,,e ice/ ,i' I4�IL 1! y . 'a Add At..40w :m irrMIOMMMMMI �'.. r di. 4-44nue I i � im \/1 w�c7V d� �A tiww = `sue �1• ��4 ', ��\`' l"F: al Ion L amp,mo lE`am1��C-mr_- c. •---ram �%:��1� a Ain No rL• rro ■� Nil ♦ 'I III tie" t-y��4 ti��� i a•idle 11 r IIIOIIII;�I+ ;• , 4*" a 1 . n ipi. 1;" i kr'' 'I suraiftriklal f3 b«c,� /1/sumildm"��.1\���e� yr iri -T-- 1 , -maim.riirtvarr —0— 1.11•11,./1111IIIIriISill'u:all..#111.11..11 El right1:: i mil 2000 0 2000 Feet N A‘, W / � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-037 7B Page 1 f CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-346 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 4G1 AND 4H SITUATED IN THE J. J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 4.0 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM"AG"AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 1 T District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 2 requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey,Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 3 "A" from"AG"Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 4 f SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 5 f SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Being a portion of the J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, Abstract#521 in Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a Found 60d Nail in the Centerline of Johnson Road, said nail being 687.03' N 89°43'42" E from the Southwest corner of said Freshour Survey; THENCE NORTH, 50.00' to a Found 1/2" Iron Pin; THENCE N 89°43'42" E, 7.00'to a Found 1/2" Iron Pin; THENCE North, 712.96' to a Set 5/8" Iron Pin; THENCE S 89°43'42" W, 312.13' to a Set 5/8" Iron Pin; THENCE NORTH, 492.74' to a Found 1/2" Iron Pin; THENCE N 89°43'42" E, 328.13' to a Found 1/2" Iron Pin in the West line of Lot 10, Block 3, VISTA TRAILS ADDITION, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-82, Page 44, Plat Records, Tarrant County , Texas; THENCE SOUTH, with the West line of said Block 3, 1255.70' to a Found 60D Nail in the Centerline of Johnson Road; THENCE S 89°43'42" W, with said centerline, 23.00'to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4.00 acres of land,more or less. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-037 7B Page 8 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-040 PROJECT: Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park ORDINANCE NO.: 480-347 REQUEST: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd., is requesting a rezoning of 1.554 acres located at 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard from "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "0-1" Office District. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct Public Hearing 2. Consider second reading of the rezoning request and associated revised site plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Landscaping Comments (F) Developer Comments (G) Ordinance No. 480-347 (H) 11" X 17" plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough, Site Plan Review (Ext. 787) Case Number Agenda Item ZA 00-040 7C City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is currently developed with a two-story office building, per a previously approved site plan. All landscaping, parking and other improvements are currently in place. The building is located on an individually platted lot developed as part of a larger retail/office complex. This is the southern most lot in the development. The Meadow Oaks Subdivision is located southwest of the proposed rezoning. HISTORY: Other recent activity on this property includes: • AG to Light Commercial Zoning (ZA85-011) approved in 1985 • Zoning/Concept Plan (ZA97-159) approved in February 1998 • Site Plan (ZA98-017) approved in April, 1998 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, involving 1.554 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District NOTICES: Nine (9) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area 2 Outside 200 Notification area I P&Z ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 16, 2000, at their regular meeting of June 22, 2000. CC ACTION: Council approved this item (6-0) First Reading subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 16, 2000, on June 26, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant is rezoning to the"0-1" district in order to seek a Specific Use Permit for the addition of a carport. The "0-1" district permits carports as a SUP. The zoning must be in place prior to the SUP approval. Case No. ZA00-041 is the SUP request. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-040 7C Page 1 Vicinity Map Lot 1 R3, Block 1 , Georgetown Park h6, ■�• vArarnme., i' !) ■wi ■ El--!....-illi I — .n�xs� CITY nook■■ ` LI— OF ■■ �� � �i rillimia: •mr. • ,.___NE � k: Bri pima Illir� GRAPEVINE ■% N R! �milLrl �". lii '41 IT — tigi 17:"I 0 Pi *IA 1 III 7IM I illii'' . rr-Ailk `'`���'��,~■■':T• PT 1fl!I 511 lilt WA.III 11111 11411111,11 ienrrt!Boo ff l}:di Nt 'i y� ■�. / 1A���� " to \'' /III■■ :INA im:wI■i' ! !!!ikri: i:" p �.Q.Nr.T:.,-:alit u4■OrMi.• l'i UM I:- �1 :IMP Aram EN i i/�1►a a I • aunty n•. /ltt/■■ ■m gi iL�11.\0414„y I• A1ct_r- ern p .ti: i li IN' i u n i u o�l■ _ __ MI Cr ,:0 ��� IIIIM Fiz _I u — . 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ / W y E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-040 7C Page 1 N n — — — - r 9RAW■-INTERIOR 1.1107rwee SUMMARY CHART— p rs�._�rn stTt�urtv ImmoL e...a ram iHiJJ• �. NINE � _ r O4=6 MAN■-.'R1aR EA9.NCV6 IQ CARPORT _ e _- _ ,_..,. .,., l 4" U ✓.✓ t 1 - an*ear as.wgerw MO AA • row co nrwroorrare rat." SITE PLAN rrr..m ..' ` --- ISHING91ONN PAU IL ___ _ 11-ate _µ __—_-_ ._ _. llrjMli =`` i,� It f� GP GAIIN QMTM M —� . CS „ sorra=.a ...r �'l ...,... i� �1�1• .1In�,m1E Q�I 1s II�3�IsII, • rc--4- ............ 1000000 MI rus..e...s , El sa ill •, L v - - _ S Iu9 , A t�AI,:: 9 :i I �y� ,• ,• ... _ i'l . •, �.: I E...o�.:Ya;1 ^.,, ,u! us .iiij1 .,In EL n .;3i.--IP ',�..'� WHAM NDG HEIGHT 1210107 1.00001 n - 0 M 7o \ Lza v` r. r.— 1 ! _,,,,.,4 E--I !mil 4 /mzo r.. I ' /' IIinSE TI } Y ?♦ l 00 t . 4 7- ....v 1 -I-- r. ,r;' — ; �n. • /t ,._..-__ ._. 464KMA.tt ... ;c;f r "e cY''� i --- Imo\ _ - _ .Q 6/ ' �^,..... yam; =47 ,\ ^s r. •-_ r, g� r 14 NM NOE Me *kl ...,.,.✓ Zit q W .P 1 -- '� , 1 I I I I._._ _.1 PlrlOxiG•, ( ',I T /I AIYf191 ME OM AS R -9 I ..., -.^ems"✓° �...c.� _ 1, / ovnN .,r. / �.._i • -_ - - ../ ._ode � s'`,‘Mll l t��_i.. / �'— ,�.� MAY 2 2 2 N. / MN N0 R`,..... °`"P CASE NUMBER- .e er A-2 it rg •E: ,:\CEONCESPN.SES\/S E0,10,1. G.N. 2.36 P./05/19/00 PREvtlUS E®® C.N. 9'9 A.N.05/r900 INr.E 0F.PILE SCALE. ,•-CO' INN:____.. ufcv 0.0 Crq . \ 1 City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-040 Review No: Three Date of Review: 06/16/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Lot 1-R-3, Georgetown Park, Phase III APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Georgetown Monticello Partners, LTD CNK Associates, Inc. 1111 South Main, Suite 200 2045 North Highway 360, Ste 160 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grand Prairie, TX 75050 Phone: (817)488-4200 Phone: (817) 640-0100 Fax: (817)424-2448 Attn: Steve Isbell Fax: (817) 633-3309 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/22/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies with previous approvals Residential Adjacency Y Complies with previous approvals Building Articulation Y Complies with previous approvals Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 3 Interior Landscape Y See Comment No.2 Driveways Y No new drive construction proposed,complies with previous approvals This review is limited to the addition of the proposed carport only and the associated changes. There are no other changes proposed to the site. This site is subject to all previous conditions of approval unless otherwise noted and approved by the City Council. 1. Based on the uses indicated for this building, a minimum of eight spaces shall be provided for the first 1000 s.f.,plus 1 space per each 300 square feet of general office floor area, and 1 space per each 150 square feet of medical office floor area. The required parking for this lot is 60 spaces. This plan provides 59 spaces. The applicant has noted that the space will be compensated by surrounding lots in Georgetown Park. The applicant may also request up to a 10% reduction in the required parking under the provisions of the Corridor Overlay and Residential Adjacency Standards, as amended. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-040 7C Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas 2. Indicate the amount of landscaping to be provided on the site in the interior landscape chart. SUMMARY CHART—INTERIOR LANDSCAPE FOR CARPORT 1 Required or Landscape Area Ground Cover Seasonal Color Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Provided (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Required 630 1 3 16 95 _ 13 Provided* 630 1 3 16 95 13 *To be located at the direction of the City Landscape Administrator 3. Remove the variance labels from the bufferyard summary chart. P&Z Action June 22, 2000:Approved Subject to Site Plan Review Summary No 3, dated 6/16/00. CC Action 1st ReadingJune26, 2000:Approved * There shall be no more than one (1) carport, attached or detached, per lot. * This site may not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 65% for the "0-1" Zoning District. Impervious coverage for this lot is approximately 44%. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA00- 040" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking requirement in the zoning ordinance are met and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Steve Isbell, Georgetown Monticello Partners, LTD VIA FAX: ABOVE CNK Associates, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-040ZSP3.DOC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-040 7C Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas Case No. 00-040 Review No. Two Resubmittal Dated: 5 — 11 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Lot 1R3, Georgetown Park, Phase III (Rezoning/Site Plan)Resubmittal Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 5 - 01 - 00 . Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: * The applicant has installed all of the required plant material and received a Certificate of Occupancy for the previously proposed development. The approval of the proposed carports would require that the applicant provide additional required landscaping for the square footage area of the parking spaces covered by the carport. I recommend that if there is not room to plant the required plant material close to the carport area, that the plant material be planted somewhere else in the Georgetown Park complex. * Since there is limited area located adjacent to the carport to install the required plant material, another suitable site in the Georgetown Park complex may be more suitable and in need of new plant material. Please confirm with the City Staff where the required plant material will be installed. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA 00-040 7C Page 1 Jun . 14. 2000 10: 19AM No. 9952 P. 1/1 MN Realty Capital Corporation June 14, 2000 Mr. Art Wright City of Southlake Via Facsimile: 817 488 9370 Re: ZA-00-040 and ZA 00-041 Mr. Wright; Please let this letter serve as notification that Realty Capital Corporation intends to provide the landscaping required for the Specific Use Permit for a carport. Please feel free to call should you have any questions, 817 488 4200, extension 127. Sincerely, Realty Capital Corporation i1 teve Isbell 1111 South Main Street,Suite 200,Grapevine,Texas 76021 •(817)488-4200•Fax(817)424-2448 Case No. Agenda Item 2chment F ZA 00-040 �C RECD %. .. ` Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-347 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R3, BLOCK 1, GEORGETOWN PARK, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4041, PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.554 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 1 amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 2 view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large,the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 3 SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to"0-1" Office District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 4 streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 5 SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 8 EXHIBIT "B" , (-4 l'Df\l1.s-divDossy'Awl: ,e,02s^ Mai 1)1Y1liLnOs ''1!d. ii i ; i3 1' I ' I.1 i 1, 1 I I 1 i 1 < III gSVHd )111Vd NM01,3911030 I ! i 1,Ill i: 1 kl, ..k c.1 ,., I , ,- ,.,11 • 8IA 1 , , § t— I.,1!1. :,i '' '1/4\-. t" ' - • . _ itOilt, ' ll t : '7: 1. 1 1i 0 ...*'• itiHlii ;11 _:2 11. - -• 2, to - -t , loii! . .. , . 1 . 1 lot , ---- pi a - 3 I 1: : L.- • — '1 . I/1 1 /-1- i ;, 1-...1 ligi ...,1 : - \ --c- it,; ; , 1 1 Jel if ; rt•Ir ; 1 , J..;,.. 11 , i - --• • 11ii! 'i - '•• ' 1! 1 1 1 it ' •'..... il - . ' II; I , g; - bli.iiiii-•..'7',.. ... . - •-II • Ar. 'fr,CIg- . 'tiii iliii ii Ai n..r.7"."3.--;•..,•;.... ------ 1. •t,7:,,,,,:,:‘,„::77:,::,'.'1, ------_ il f 1 , ' g •. 0.,..T.,21 6 0 . . , ,..,,.. '...1 11...1'...i:.:: i.,, t;°(:;-';'"'.''IF--_,- --;-4,,,, 4.'",-..0g-:1_, ; -,. ..: , '. ‘ t?ft4:':::'‘Ii:--:' , . ,.:.:17i s'i (12;PI , -. ....:, ..___, ,.... .,,,., .. -_ ,, • - _ 1 1 ''I ; 1•111:41.T: tr.., :, . - ,- . ...11?.1,,.-L-:ir• p:, '.."1.1 ; : ._•_.. , irli • •r. ..........i I ' •:,r: ' i .1.) - ' ' ; . . . 0 . .•. . . .. . ..., , / ';-;;;•- ' i 1 f', i„,-;;;• ' •,--•: : ;; '2! ; ;- k ,oar.„ . ,, , . Iwilal. . , 7 , , , ., 1 '1 il ,,41 41 01Z.;411A 1 1 i i ' f . - \ .,..:._. T'.2 .:i; . q , 1 . 1 r.,-, - !i i'li , . 1 I [07 0 'I' . A' ' ,'Wi pi• ...., ,, 1 :: - t! ;-,:: r a • I, ' ti:' - .;i:,, ;. .. ; ,• , . ;;;;' e. :i6-1; i ''' alliff : 44--',,L. ''• :.rr: ! 'r' '',' !, I !i:i5 I lal. IA i''I ' ' 3i'. 1, 1 •-•,:. - , • ; ; • , . • •- ill' r al -, ; ; :•:: . , . . • • 44'ti; . , 1 ii'M ' '1 r--. i I' 'qr. ,!iii,• - ,li,- ,,!. , ' i • ,_•••• .„• , • 13 l ' lg' 'i,r , ., 114::6-,::-.7.,,,,,,..:-.=•.: -,-,L , _.;:.•.:,.,:_. : 7— ',:f:'.1., il'.' 11'4 .: 1 Illii '-'i .--. '' :Al i tr lii 1 .1, •il't r ' VP 7 .----- - 'k - ;:i • — -1=,. .:.!.' 1;!!1• !,, L„ - . ,... ....'-: . 1! • 't 1.;',fili,14--;-,'It . I_ II,tv, , , 1 i!!! ,4 "!-...• , i•., ,t14-_0 •, i ,1‘ 1 r . . 1 '! ., •tr.• c.:1111 ----. ... „ ,!,„...1 . '• '' ',1• I•!---•!!,-;::',.. ....qr'.. --,, 41 '''„i!!! • ; ., - •••!-!,..-ri: :r1,. • i . ,,t;..::' lq !kor--------q -7, , f ; : .zi),.1; ;. ; ;•:,_...--L----IL--••• -'-•' ' 3 [•,'',' ii ''' ,"'.,/,',VC2.:1'i \-'.. +arm.. i ,••••;1 .,''''Fr-;--7-,,,, '- ',,,___44,.:-. ..,,,,,-1-,:iri- 4 a ;v ! r • 1r- !. 1 ;,.•""f.:.,....a...,......•01:\ ,",•?,:k.';'-•\''':-,11.2. • -{ti ; i r . • • : r ; ' r lal ! 1 i , :1 1 , , ;;,;;;;1;!;.: z... .';,\•;. ‘.1 ,'N:',(\\.N1— ---1‘.. I • r ; 1 • isiri ' ! 1 ' 1 I ' : • . ill : -.1_:‘ ,-L\ .14.Ji te1 .i...4, 41.----tk;:`, ::',4>k' 1.6 s\'‘, _:;,;_a .--1.-_-..,..r.; 1.,:': j 1 1 I , ;;;11 . - ‘‘ ct 1 1 ! 11 ''i $, !: = =' '% if, tiij! ,.,!,!, , . t i it% i 5 . gil 1-',ri •'..1.,.1:11! r. • 1 allii' ' . 1 .1:1' . . ' ' ' --L . " 1 gi'r i - --•• ' II 1 , 1.'"Il 1 ' I ' ' , . .S: .' '. !t' .3- , , !, I v jilt f i- ' Tfr'..P.; ' - . 1-;;F. :ifaii'at !i : :, . 1--1-:-* -';::a : •:111,- - IL I Il i . • ',-941"ah ,,'- , ;.* .i:', _ 1 li..:.-...-,-..„........0;.- -------------77,77.7-1''''' ..sw ....`, 1 1 al X 1 X 31 i !1 il ill i:d it, ki I,- jk 1 4 ei' 414:11 11! /:illild itet4P. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-040 7C Page 9 City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-041 PROJECT: Specific Use Permit- Carport for Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park RESOLUTION NO.: 00-071 REQUEST: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd., is requesting a Specific Use Permit for a carport for a non-residential property at 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Resolution No. 00-071 • (E) 11"X 17" plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning (Ext. 743) . 410 Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-041 7D City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION • OWNER/APPLICANT: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is currently developed with a two-story office building, per a previously approved site plan. All landscaping, parking and other improvements are currently in place. The building is located on an individually platted lot developed as part of a larger retail/office complex. This is the southern most lot in the development. The Meadow Oaks Subdivision is located southwest of the proposed rezoning. HISTORY: Previous activity on this property includes: • AG to Light Commercial Zoning (ZA85-011) approved in 1985 • Zoning/Concept Plan (ZA97-159) approved in February, 1998 • Site Plan(ZA98-017) approved in April 1998 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District NOTICES: Nine (9) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200'Notification Area 1 Outside 200'Notification area P&Z ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item (7-0) subject to the Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 16, 2000, for Case No. ZA00-040, on June 22, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: The site plan review was prepared with the rezoning case, please refer to rezoning and Revised Site Plan Review Summary Case No. ZA00-040. No review was prepared for the SUP. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-041 SU.doc • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-041 7D Page 1 J Vicinity Map Lot 1 R3, Block 1 , Georgetown Park mv, 1 � t » . -....166, „pm= dm. 1mai . .;.,1_,..0 k ....a .^.r_z'x,,,■ _ CITY almaOF ormun i:.i�I•�:1�.�Ihrop ri imam GRAPEVINE . 1111- '[ i ' NMI sililliiih ill II mi:-.',II 1 IIE me, . MU , . II 1--t--- L_ _______ .malmmill _.....157 tb .i....44 I I a rTe.N,rsuill.1111111111111k go diw IIViuul\ - ;M — - �..'.:vierevr o. isk w11111t �.T�iiGR!I ea-m mg ism w1 ate 2 No imo 40 /ys�m /�I' -7-*_mr =r- _ ii r 7,ma�r!w:Ma fi11iaM 11 lino un i��I�.�1►� lari111161' fill- �1111111 ' ■ r13�1'1 is :.:+ice.ii ! „ �Ii 10.ime■Mi ■ra 1'��� iii l): • 1 ,D ■ •Ralf7L ;� �I: ono\ is- / SV. • ri -to . Ar EsI 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ /— W / � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-041 7D Page 1 o . L. i6 a 12 I it Et 8 • r -- . --------------------- ----- ------- I ROOF LINE -------- I d U --5TL. TUBE 7 it6' \-- i - - �' ®0 i II'x2C'BRICK COL. i H m -k --��-AROUND 4'x4' 57L. TUBE COL. i El I. I_ i \ -30 YEARS COMPOSITION SI-IMYLE ROOF TYPICAL 12 /1 Qr _ 1 5 �5 ,1-- FIBER CEMENT \ �I ✓t Q FASCIA I SLFFIT I' W C� ♦ M FRONT & REAR ELEVATION END ELEVA770N CARPORT FOR 6 SPACES - SCALE:I/I'.I'-0. — IA Ins NM uv WWI 2A Jo-0 Lfi saw MP RECt MR 7 20 G L� — MINT PM A4B b = - ---- -- - AD Ott i:\CEORGE\PW SC:SA Am triton: C.N. S:O4 E.M.03/27/CO NIENOOS EDITOR: OWC.nut SOLE /t'.I'-O- GOP: IKC4._.._— OK/ _—._— eD t-e4 )-in Resolution No.00-71 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CARPORT ON NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R3, BLOCK 1,GEORGETOWN PARK,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4041, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.554 ACRES,MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for a carport on non-residential property has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "0-1" Office District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (41) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a carport on non-residential property on the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-041 7D Page 1 Resolution No.00-71 Page 2 property being legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-041 7D Page 2 Resolution No.00-71 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas I Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-041 7D Page 3 Resolution No.00-71 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-041 7D Page 4 A. N n Aso y A o Z qd 41. ° CD o I-. � 0 . a ..R. MU .: ..00.. o 5ITh LNIA SUMMARY — -_ .-.... - -_._ ter.-,,,f,.. �...�i IA s Y; r. -_I I Srl t PLO., I 1 '' '1."'4 i,,, ., _. ........___ . . . ..,._....._ ...... it ?.:,' o y .4 < . r r �.. �. _ - I ›' -'ry {_1_`,- {, _ •• " y . '94,.'1 I::. E @ 1'.:="0,X r ,, --• et> r-P `— f rJ h+l C c. '`_� g K 3 V td •11?..1V-n• yr- `� npawe 0• LXIST it G f, 6 A '� "A / x It ''"...'' '''''..... :‘,'''''' .''."'''4-"4' W "sQ1s 1IT a-.5„ [ —.rtr __- - ---/ SI- .n., - tip;.-` t _' A� i.`� o.�. a MAY 22 2Q1 .,... . CASE NUMBER, A-2��. _ _ � 1 "�W w .. z.wo i Iv e e, Resolution No.00-71 Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-041 7D Page 6 w City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-047 PROJECT: Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition ORDINANCE NO: 480-343 REQUEST: The City of Southlake is requesting a rezoning and site plan approval ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading of the rezoning and associated site plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Tree Preservation Analysis (F) Ordinance No. 480-343 (G) Letters from Neighboring Property Owners (H) 11"x17" Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-047 7E City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake PROPERTY SITUATION: Property is located near the northeast corner of W. Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The site is bounded by an existing Texaco gas station to the southwest, Schlotzsky's Sandwich Shop to the east and Meyer's Meadows Open Space to the north. The east and west portions of the site are zoned"C-2" local retail commercial district. The middle portion of the site is "AG" agricultural district. HISTORY: Portions of this property were zoned "C-2" in September of 1991 and February of 1994. Concept plans for 3 pads sites within the boundary of the site were approved in September of 1991 and October of 1995. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; involving 4.054 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage NOTICES: Thirteen (13) to property owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) to property owners outside the 200' notification area. In Favor Opposed Undecided Responses with comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area 2 1 P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, and to delete Items#1.a (500' driveway spacing on F.M. 1709) and #1.b (250' driveway spacing on Randol Mill Avenue). COUNCIL ACTION: June 20, 2000; Approved (7-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. The following variances need council action: • Driveway spacing along Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-047SPnew.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-047 7E Page 1 .. Vicinity Map Lot 3, Block 1 , Corner Addition le M3 P r it e'ff.r plei m e : . milia, _mom Jim :,..gim_1 Filar gimmalu kko r"..4iatficz 1 ”I'm . • �. --. ... - � �� I �♦ _ R� - Mnr_ .:D i . ._. cem ■ .„ sink, ai.Ilig iiinati min 2 9r,915--4.10•1 A"4 :;TERNIS•4t,tigr • ■FAR ifilI. am ...■ ilvieliiril ■ :p iiihulsk6112,07.7,,iitirir. W II i MIM w•ij - ' , jri T ! ♦�:♦fir• ♦ ar• \■��1 in .111 n_ ♦ �■�■o v0107 miti. i•ER-Bollav d- ::.1.6.. > /11 v.��1.1o./zfRG��� v-,sn w��_ Ak, All i. MMIIINIciumill W dq...,,4 . .1114:-a,1117 Ili allilltlarvii$,....,., mg sigoi/ MEM MIN MOW 1 BI 41010.1.miLialiliVtaitattgatsAiwt mi ill ill I 7 l's I:WTI=rilligagq,erniii Iktit F■■■■.a■lid\/idum I. `�����*'�; .'�.�say .. NE 111111..1.-111111—b:A.I.111 Elm olitf*,01# ir4sq ' lionum ii �T : ,R �?!:+"4. III■ ■■-%��i..I"■M1N !�■■� i %' :te r ,uVIV A ImallifPlimill1 • 1.'.,. •r11 I[`�~er 'N• fth ri Alm.* •. . . 1 E•, I`ir■■■fir ■ �1� •4W if!aftio Sal ten ;I' ,4,* 2000 0 2000 Feet N \J/� W 1 E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-047 7E Page 1 U ^' a a.) es 8 - 0000'1 INA, :1110 ....r aril (zK0 rsfa-Jrc(r,z) Z w w 1 •, �e 0are-vc1 rrrl .�•.1 ��'� 9]aSSOi1J 3Nr1Hl/pS es F IMP-ASCU Xi' left-rN l.rel ...-....f- \ n01B 0] � (...., r, 9nN] YB1MIs/11YON aft .r. i -r_ " ...r '' ,4"ON!.Nr'NOS0000'1 ONONAYN JII01NWNoS J0 A113 u . •- _ -(..Na]Nrm vsNea wrf-.. rR ....r _w +. •• t %ie.�• SYx3l :1.7NXOJ.LNYNPYl '3NY7XLIP9 JO AllJ p 1r-J111 7.97.1 -.q ..a a -] 11-- _r.. 1-1MO" o, I j OOS'oN 3JYNISSY 1334NOS 004Y)'N'I n •-s n, .. .. ... � _ fe1'1'111d1110-0�°AN /• 'tOW. ! panne w a Nr aisOiO•-snr i Noauaar a9Naos •=2.= nn ra...:; :.= ..., 1"+... i••�... -- . .-a ..0 13srNe / �(INi av w r . w —� ayssoao 3N1/H11aK .• •;, op.107 Pe0-00.1'0N SSYJ AAIJ u -w Nnle 1e 101 ' B?ON N377✓7 f 9 saeN.luan-1N/D wra.lrs 101 =T: w f-. �i�'�r ` ,1• e70 VI � �r 1 r++. N.., �....., •w- 4 .S� / rM e.ra,wrnonSafl ) SONO3 r erto _ -- ^_ saminune-1W101tlnnR6 I/00oP T 101 \ : ���.t•• .. I MOM•P so'I r5,1' I 3ee0i0N1 IAOIw-1w10 ulv w m w at n mu .sot ponyan to M ...� _ / -•/ I R 3er']SQNI Agomum-iron mnorme I wow t 107 i//. y ; ri / aef OJ33f)a 1Nr ]'h1003 snolw3Na -•i �� �1 TT .LOI 0750aOMf A e3iYNTV ,/ /I Sb✓e of fDYeS it 03800✓0.NYY/ ,ww,:m, -:J �• , ,�; J / I I G,e.ac;'_ _o.,.. I3.es a S33YeS 01 :Clauzr Awe., •,•Jos 11O /�{'' / . ,,�q/ I _ .., J if roew J7.NIA SS roost AN sled MOOD T'/(y 5�'7 % �"/ 1 !I waxer N?QO N37N V T IS tleY[1 J,Hi.sgS/.jr10'w S faw NO02150"'NSA ��h3Pi T �� ,'+i1 1 .. I 1 I,/ A ns'u 1r16 rA .vAYv 9•w/N')i \ /// ) s`*dy/ r; / /71 I¢��.. —If I Jr'Z JS torte it,raM m/.a late --tvT :ores Nw.:o s+' _ S�` -0$ (P d v,,,'% /''Ze'' / )f i 5 sail/,e errwr 74 Nat, 'rz,/As(SSW cry YJrew0J-Fd td• OW /fi� �/ �`' i / f.eswi M -„n I . i I-67252 A raw .33r3K,1 imam m'O1.-.,v ve' �r Js ere ur, AS MS, 30r3Yr5sM0 CM'AV ..: / u 0 .:1;'',/ ^�'�. / / ntN[r1s sr0 0.7vx31 SI� , I If.I uhaav, 70G'w+1ez1 Wail IcarrOGIO 03i0 Nwr YiY JOI�wwetias .,, `At` ./ Z, 1 ,yp,7 0 q .* t'R :'".• I CU - a1 RN/RI.S7fn SO/N 1-d-S t-J 'NAVA OrSJ.:0eb /G1/- '.; V. , a.C4Voo'X J I ' ,O" e//I: .\ ,( I - Gwerafm� ..rj ~' w W741316 Weld 1JINN30 AGll Y.O110.7o5 — \ ,6,"✓ '�►- \ '� 1 ^� 1"•.- r � a <,i::74 / 3w•''� ea I e-lw ON zzwcro awNNl ww.ono]7M6 av1,1r1 Yin t tn.-Ammo M ,y �4 re .).-Li mnwvu MVO sr JOWLS uslro cw , / 1 f r_:<•." v O a d� •' I 31w aMssoe Jlos % � 9.•. ♦= 7 \� y/ " /' e I n� . nos rto7 i , J S JJ' & °'' 44 .vyf"' ,� • -,'. / v,'' .f ik z' 1' ,;:, •t T'.,1 -'-` .:6 ri ti , I �e r a. NJJwrNruf : .q/• v d 1 ..r 3m 3.1 fTJ�, s .o, ✓ sr.,n v-'�' =,1 •fir ) t A ,- I°` V is�..-e _ 1 ' :11 //r I. �(v 1 I .1 I 1 /•eAq YS find' • ,,:\:,;',,,' , I 11 1 /✓: n ► �i I /lA]�JrJ . 1 11 j °e / ,t. i ) '0 o i i sv/lywNl T 111II .3aw]v'moon 'nOni 'ONA • p11' ' e r.sf129."".].-mv IJ 'O Y'�? i 1 I pop? .. Xi I.,• 11I T I j 1 3w!Nef3 mN/1 rONdONS --- ,..00 i4/' f 1W79 r 107rosary yt�. .�•�O _ ; i 11 3a1 Y3aa MOM WOW '�.� ♦ / .vz.mo.'w I�r� x '2s•{ _. 11 1 �=i�""R(INS Ic...a::,N..°.TP'.o,...,al QV3937 i1 i� p I° mrry-Ja ,p >8r 1r 1j/// `D 'I"'� s ` !�14 / 9 10�rr0 Jnziw.uvcua �% dl f® c.p . , E' n,"°,�^£1 - •'_ �'w� nl��""k I ii).to 1 r ;ill _ 1 - ,y N M 4' $ . / Sib 4' • .oar i `"M 'y / N P �- - .aa aAll1 ,09IP wl w sre \ 1 T. Notr.N e° I.1*,�,s ' _ v � � ' .-; ,r.�1.,, n; / ,r,l, rw.rty' nw..,a. n 1 —3a T �a . .yc A �' ..+o .•.v d M ^,yl " � f r.rC N rd''�' // S Gna.a.u.n✓maw--A811 , g i nairar O0I„73N s'�' `:�_ ^- N c v,v / i 8 11 - O O rxwwws° 7 z e f31 Y3 N M 1 �. pumm.vs,- /770 5.AXSZ107H35 a°yam_ �, "n wN' „�l,•rwswp�•u"'N A A100191.'S M II I. Q nomot] 30.-Nwp 3l town rs's+rp� I § I O et— U N City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-047 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 06/02/00 Project Name: Site Plan— Southlake Department of Public Safety—West Facility APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Phillips Swager Associates 667 North Carroll Avenue 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 670 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: 817-481-5581 X730 Phone: 214-692-6115 Fax: 817-481-0036 Attn: Garland Wilson Fax: 214-692-6118 Attn: John Main CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y See Comments No. 1 Lighting Y Shall Comply 1. Driveways do not comply with the Driveway Ordinance as follows: a. 500' of spacing is required between commercial driveway centerlines along Southlake Boulevard. The proposed commercial/public access driveway is approximately 320' from an existing commercial driveway to the west and approximately 348'from an existing commercial driveway to the east. (Variance Requested) * The driveway located on the east portion of the site has not been evaluated for spacing due to the proposed function of this driveway. This drive is for emergency vehicle access only. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-047 7E Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas * Please note that the proposed driveway intersecting Southlake Blvd. is in compliance with the 500' spacing required from street intersections. This driveway is 530' from the intersection of Randol Mill Ave b. 250' spacing is required between commercial/public access driveway centerlines along Randol Mill Avenue. The proposed south commercial/public access driveway intersecting Randol Mill Ave. is approximately 220' from an existing commercial driveway to the south. This driveway is also approximately 150' from the proposed north personnel access driveway. (Variance Requested) * All proposed driveways comply with stacking depth requirements. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\RE V\#SPLAN-1.WPD Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-047 7E Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-047 Date of Review: 5 —30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 3, Block 1 (Site Plan— Southlake DPS West Facility) OWNER: PREPARED BY: City of Southlake Raymond L. Goodson. Jr. Inc. 667 N. Carroll Ave. 5445 La Sierra, Suite 300 L.B. 17 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231-4138 Phone: (817)481-5581 Phone: (817) 739-8100 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant submitted a good Tree Survey that meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. The southern access drive from Randol Mill Ave. shows to remove eighteen (18) existing trees. Out of the total 18 trees, six (6) are dead and four (4) are protected species according to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; and eight (8) are marginal or not protected. Only one (1) of the marginal trees, a Green Ash, is considerable of preserving. The others are declining or in a hazardous state. 3. To better preserve the trees within the area of the North bufferyard, the proposed retention wall could be moved to the North side of the trees where it would not be necessary to make any grade changes between the retention wall and the North parking spaces and access drive. The wall should be constructed on the far North side of the bufferyard. 4. Out of the total 125 existing trees on the site, 40 would need to be removed for the proposed construction; leaving 85 remaining on the site. I noticed only two trees on the site that could possibly be transplanted and moved to another site. They were a 6" Cedar Elm and a 4" Pecan. The Cedar Elm is designated by the #78 on the Landscape Plan and the Pecan is not identified on the plans. 5. Although Lot 2R, Block 1 is not a part of the proposed plan, the design of the site removes the best trees on the site. Of course the trees in the middle of the lot could not be saved because they Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-04 7 7E Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas would be in the middle of a building. But, if the parking lot area was redesigned and grade changes kept minimal more of the specimen trees could be preserved. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this site. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Informational comments= * Observational comments = # Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-047 7E Page 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-343 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 981,PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS; LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3,W.R.EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2833,PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2,W.R.EAVES SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 500; AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 4.054 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES LIMITED TO A PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY AND TO INCLUDE ANY ASSOCIATED OUTSIDE STORAGE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 2 concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 3 Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 4 subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 5 the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 6 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 7 CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres LOT 3, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION Being a tract or parcel of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake,Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas and being all of Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, part of that tract of land conveyed to Robert G. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 3976, Page 12, Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas,all of Lot 2 and part of Lot 3, W.R Eaves No 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain&Crawford'found for corner in the northwesterly line of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. No. 1709)(a 130 foot right-of-way),said rod being the southerly common corner between Lot 1, Block 1 of said Corner Addition and Brown tract; THENCE North 50°54'50" East, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 228.82 feet to a 1/2"iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped"RLG'set for corner at the POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE North 39°05'10"West, a distance of 190.47 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped"RLG"set for corner, THENCE South 51°04'37" West, a distance of 148.72 feet pass a chisel mark found at the easterly common corner of Lots 1 and 2 of said Corner Addition, and a total distance of 342.34 feet to a chisel mark set in the east line of Randol Mill Road (a variable width right-of-way)from which a chisel mark found bears South 55°50'40"East, a distance of 0.31 feet, said chisel mark set being the westerly common corner between said Lots 1 and 2 of Corner Addition; THENCE North 00°04'07" East, along the east line of said Randol Mill Road, a distance of 361.88 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain & Crawford"found for corner, said rod being the southerly line of a tract of land conveyed to Harold Saunders by deed recorded in Volume 7232, Page 428, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 79°24'07' East, along the southerly line of said Saunders tract, a distance of 81.23 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain& Crawford"found for an angle point, said rod being the northerly common corner between said Lot 2, Block 1 of Corner Addition and said Brown tract; THENCE North 79°32'27" East, continuing along the southerly line of said Saunders tract, a distance of 64.60 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain &Crawford"found for an angle point, said rod being the southerly common corner between said Saunders tract and Myers Meadow Phase Two, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2160, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 79°54'00" East, along the southerly lino of said Myers Meadow Phase Two, a distance of 418.68 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." found for corner, said rod being the northerly common corner between Lots 1 and 2 of said W.R, Eaves No. 500 Addition; Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 9 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE South 39'00'45" East, along the common line between said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 189.46 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG' set for corner in the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, said rod being the southerly common corner between said Lots 1 and 2; THENCE South 50'54'50" West, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 380.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 176,814 square feet or 4.05 acres of land, more or less. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 10 N n YAD o '" o f9 00 AI i , ► I °" .afna Y— o �ow NA sa�nsu rYrlr5M00Ww4SCY . trrPTA R¢:5auow WY E j^ n.w w nrmr MBt°u`W-N^*N , r n., " si-- t ' r, nµ r it... •• . n ajC '" .i7 `h .''' 1:4°T+emu1 ;_ t 7" 1 1• ,fir rm` . d .,., R: / ‘11 !atl7 x .{wjfOtl s r \ orb ai �,�///J" d /♦ ( i I ; f" N 8' "r, .�'. • naa=Du" "j'/ ram'-/1 / / :::EX:C# /, "uR..1 i i 1� rRAr G I-STpPY9CMpW11 y lacryn �' A J� ?7,S7J SF. 1�- yam maga. I Vr 11 V s1- ! 4 %✓ a .R . \ / � a� I i : 11. I'} :, C,.. • " y �!/51, `N.v�Ak .� / :10:..........RMar5 i F-Ea......"Z4s:: _ :''_� I1I 11,11 y `.• } "r .,Lea - . '.�ri• j�, / j SCUISLAsE�M `�.,IOWA rwm OWE. .>var.w `l, C t; � illR t., .A. 1 _Y ✓/� � • W...:,r,.»I Oc �; eer \ r M / _ 1 .'f ... ` �1. �y,'(�'yr, 9/E Md FYIMY �Y.rw� ���� (( S ����..II11§ �i c{,�n I�/ a ✓- vrw tors 1"'y Co, AI�I�T AOpROT I i- I I; / j�:..'` t 10,E \ J �,1V'MAW Man'RAY 91£PLAY CZ Y.Y «< 4' J/• ^ IP .�. Sir ' "''' _MaA-At Ina tt4mac. �- bd It •;H�j' ! ni°w^n'r:mRw %, r v _ rd 8�e.^ .•-.,., .RAC �j ,.�n,.i,:.. ...v..Y..i,ur. k;.:•..tl \ WG �, ..,'^� 5' '" ` A(Lr.a.A,s+a( . ,=..I.,,. .A ar..AYYriAVA rI i I / , 's ,t A.n.(AW ,r, ,InJ r .Y,M.,Au,e F' / �/ 3e,• r \ alAt Arr.vawoA w r pMXOTIATA�OVYL'Y,nar 0. uA! A 4 �q�.mAW , G.•i Vir. �j - xz, Snvi w•ae� ' n0a weu- aifis pm dYns .m'v pals♦ am( 1 uVMAY, Tat.TAwa yYA�n""��'T 1 e TAwK MOO. w sAOS %-' .hm2af WI ,car 33441301.6 / 1 `‘ / r�w...Y,..Y.r�R. '•(r Maw aAaln •,wan®RA .uR.v/AIR err'Er rea.A s,.rE a t0f a,YOA,1 ANrr -MOM,A M.( i1 II JI > i./ T.=i l-i. SITE PUN T AURr _....._..-----a- .r. "+. �'-�. �i MAW YIOt1ArO r..�� ` � cot to AI0C0, 9N4LL A Or at? AC I / }.:• \ f'` �''"` :^fir •,ar/aa(urr. -A.mnn rm b-I'� cm rv>�Ro�uao-ws A 6 �YY�I�1 .- a �w ' •� �tR �' sAliogAol®'.c �,- :_.' ^ '..g, f,^y CORNER IDDlTION Y•:tek '� u'As •'te r. y-• e " — ^- rs ( • • I R,EAVES SURY(1:ABSTRACT Ma BOO 1 .v Ara mama) m ^•- I_-. ; , ^ a- Or _ • 3 - LITY 0R sOUTnU(B.TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS �� � OE SOf 4YOM L.rAOOSON.JR IMC v-� . wwr..rr.r- -CI E .,,n.“,, ....A..AIM (w, u(. b314 WO.MPH. •!ar-.IM ( / SOVA LPoSSIT Yr ems.,. t s.r Old)MAU.(PM ta ra r urt. HRHr.woo A m 3 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-047 7E Page 12 t.a I a �/1 UV V 1 1.1LA111. NOTICE TO INTERESTED PROPERTY OWNERS REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-047 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition,an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. A Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition,will also be considered with this request. This property is located on the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709)approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. The request is being submitted by the Owner and Applicant, City of Southlake. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. A public hearing will be held by the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday, June 8, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter, it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake, Texas, 76092. REFS : ZA 00-047 I am in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: y „hoc-e, &v n 1 E ryI5Fhc;r z y cz.c IF,./F-F F 'y L PS Sreucr F L c 4p Pe..4r0.5 . SIGNATURE: 1 (Please Print Name) J M �, ,,,,,r it - ADDRESS: l 6 r Kri„‘„• 'C l 0 c Z 2000 PHONE: l t i) 47� <_33'y(� Vt1 J V ZA COURTESY NOTICE HAS B* W IA REGULAR MAIL*** Attachment G 00- 7 e Page 1 w City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-048 PROJECT: Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition ORDINANCE NO: 480-344 REQUEST: The City of Southlake is requesting a rezoning and concept plan approval. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading of rezoning and associated concept plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Tree Preservation Analysis (F) Ordinance No. 480-344 (G) 11"x17" Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy(Ext. 743) Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-048 7F City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake PROPERTY SITUATION: Property is located near the northeast corner of W. Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The site is bounded by an existing Texaco gas station to the west and the DPS West Public Safety Facilty to the north and east. HISTORY: The majority of this site has been zoned "AG" agricultural district since the adoption of Ordinace No. 480 in 1989. The east portion of this site was zoned "C-2" in February of 1994 and was part of a concept plan for 3 pads sites October of 1995. Two pads sites of this approved concept plan remain vacant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; involving 0.822 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District NOTICES: Five (5) to property owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) to property owners outside the 200' notification area In Favor Opposed Undecided Total Responses Received Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area 1 P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, and to delete Items#1.a(500' driveway spacing on F.M. 1709) and#1.b (250' driveway spacing on Randol Mill Avenue). COUNCIL ACTION: June 20, 2000; Approved (7-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. There are no requested variances. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-048CPnew.doc it Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-048 7F Page 1 . . Vicinity Map Lot 2R, Block 1 Corner Addition ,. :.. -m..• I1111111 Ali' �,1 ♦ n�!1�II/n/I�me ■t1 ►j 1III11:Milt Comm• il 1111 1 ►��T�C■ h► oI� 1���1i%.�4 �0 riuiI1 .- . tv. ell II ,IIIMI . pi ROM . . a' id L . ��♦ .e .4 i0-40;1,1► 1n 1�„Ji cCI _ �;ry j':'•:�:: III/ P?ia uI�■fi� :_ :i•�d' )eii a ` saw_ ■ ' i ■ SI Cre II ' N"►4' °_P. "'�" I •I EMI II — JOK.W. gil 1.7•Mmultiorti viA91, It ... . • • .1. .i . or ..., Alp II ......._ )v4.. ill alp, > LOD ON MPI ,1 tlN(!41.:1 0s .iI • 1 "i �I,,,'1' lle-■i ita Wit\aliiii IITIM■k 1 klafeti 1-.�•��I1���I� f4: 01 , liIII/ MIMIM■I,�■IIR IAC.ftIlnoi►►I► ► ir• oWwa'4ii y ,�■m ���%►f1\7IN MN IIIIIri i ou ►lunlnlll 44',1b r„p-,r — atir:II ra mmiemr�nln111Par)?• to Bas•gel Will i rr Tai1 0 i11wi�a710■aos ae:�• ,s., .vir ..��{'rri� ■1111/�.. III �■..�ill/►�'.4 j iii I ON C HIJRM �� III '� M11 . NIIMILSIVIA�j�11m IIIt '7'. 11I • 'g'.144, iL,8 'Iur' ;t; ! , �� 2 1\\44�I qK CIS' 2000 0 2000 Feet N W / � E t S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-048 7F Page 1 E 04 T N l l y .�.. I Y 1 I I cpwcw axrvAn'arx soAt£ a 1 1 1 I x0 3 s Laa4E Lsur ,�, PAS �,,���SpKOTZ9(YS O!7/ , -ti rr "�' I i wlcxs MEADOW PNA.sF B ow .An+;y: n d. ,,. "" IV lLOT iilcs p �a0re ,p 0 i ly t IM O£4LC s I . rtv.o...o.:,A ,u,% ,ar n ••g, -,, AlaSPo re Dnv FY �a.rasAar�c.s Nall t o� OC ' n a�aa. »Ra..aa% 9 .... / ,„ w� Vil ,' a�an �s.>u s I e AmA r r IFm `ram i . rs•- j n N a`, 4orl• ` s.rnv r • l ` Je r!;,r», rM Ate• i I aF. _ - V +.-.-_••• ,P'p`FP` . r�' / W141, 6 .,•f //�.t91a' ■ ►,. Iry � \` 4 �P dm / .�d B1.2Y T u N .4:.., �-.•fi r •' 3. y N z,,-' @ A x • r�iaK \ ,,44 Zii TOT s I .�('L@ > _•. 1 .Ls,.°(.vn %le O, rT•star. 9 s rk, Y :' 4. MARE AMMON 0.01.201 Must-sAo or v,. A. IPro,SMITANT SENEt MC ¢--p1 ��'�,�,,9, t.. �':, ', ``s i �, a.t 4 p II��U' � —A» _ 1'�10 // - .....Slaw SC O uvr 1 I•' 14.111 Fig' , 1 1 , LOT;stoc I i �I MOP.IMIEA LAC SSS } 1 1 1 a':"`r..wr 1 11 1 ..• )r/ \ C-2maJ s��I O .wO•.wruo uovrw,c sw+ur� I u 1 ^'M VT NE 1 1 1 „�, HPMOSL'D V' oA' f� W OESGwIMrT q 11 1 ;I1 1` IH4/V;Ef' \ '1 '�• 'O`�,s '` I-sravr eucaNc ..' ,,,,,g. i /,� i BaT.rBrw%s . $ I i i .4 FAGLrT/ 1> I c5 Al 4 FRS es� \ �d>� Ay ,; i; Fc 11 1 - .d>a...rr.r / k - a,t 5t r c or>.ecocrl ` a rwr arlr ii 'I �1 �_ Jr rt-V-- xh ,rg / - (7, , • / s� � it. / / sa me crr �c .s _ { 1__ Ii el 1. pwv.�+tip" '.-"-'' ::#�'J 0.0` 40 \1; q' �,%d°i4 Apr`'o y'.�_r••/ /.. / \ _ — Z_ _� .. 2 3 a --.—P1'J a. 'r.P': '+ .�\ to � `9`�I°d _,(i�0/ ''',/ m�. \ .......!_ �.....= —r.. W .,:� ry 8 ' I / Sol)`FILAKE`cwasavc 1AI I ,� ♦F l � , b a ids^' PHASE R ^f>re l�/� / Me 1,/,p,1 I rp OOJYIC sR»ALE s ROW PAWED V`I I Ij Z 1 1 , 40 • �< - ‘St \ �J '.I V• / lue [v.orlvl s M.LOIAC 9Nla CpI[r Mw(MOM arWMC(M0.Pal-I k �A y T Q. R f- a ill ,.v * T1R fit iJljj/ r •rr �0'i/\_0' \ / SITE DATA SUMMARY LOT �, �1. Ili '' Y✓" 1� 0-0_ mya}Y"el,/ -Ilti-C7 .c,... .t-7'i' • -','‘../ - �1 j / X #` LOTM Lor.3 ►1 DRAW z. mnnv I �I Ili 1 ,r'/y I A/RN CCVIC PT RAN STE RAN V. j> ''1 ` 3-., f 4iJ- Y •`// Y Sp/OBAB£moor I PVGS9N6 1 45fP QAW RIFs .S A[Cp[ApAt Bfr»NIE1hA( T I a? �' \ J A '�� �l ) : ,r�r/ c..�. Bar,.,, Twos.ar rr.' .Hera g rxs,.sr rn 7EXACO GAS STA NEAN / : o , 0U-,,,,,,,1' -."d`� n.e_u`..e.s,v.y .cr.ar+ti 35a3 s> r>aaa sr I Ilk, tXRAEA ADLYRCW / Y0I j/ t ! e"� //\\ .w.�r.. vre rolrBAx Pan Sr/IBJB. Irw•rr.man,sr/*MA- • 61 y 1,�+.1 n`°-"`'s"' 3 ,s+a'/ ,ac 4 .;Aj�. —< s° 0° °:COT' dr ��rA / ��ytv.-� r FN �/ [} :• ,4• MG a MFN SPACE TAW Sr/IN RIM•rT BB10>Sr/AAA 5.1 Z • / ', jpp,{f' r'+ % \ SWAM AREA- A» mut:fl.5>a Sr JF a>RE.tw.ortE Izw3 sr. mrear WV SF 1 �¢ ,IPVAw u PLetJc/scwtwc n,.el>s''1/,''(( Z j- /' . r. -.r r IOTAt..POP AKA' ELL _715,2 SF.tN 1...?SARI Y t .L G AILFH AATA OT /�ACq'!KN , �I,F:"/ , i� 510t/DR.AIIE CAOS'SM,G - 1Purer �'r PNASF a PAPAwG Ar0 TR zr own SO SPACES Rua.=Mmm.% I . / i %/ "'/ M1w--.z p.K awmrau, vwwevG Arrow'', H STAGES SQ�KEs r .� :' MCC a-, MAMBA OF PROPOSED WA I LOT -r CPT _ // / mer m ws COTERMQ. NOr ro EXCEID>OR ez>A Sr/A>r mop•rr roams s'/err t t / LOT A KOC K 1 SUMMARY 01MT-w1EO0A LNSSCAPE •l ANaN6 FALYrrV / l�1 '1 \ � j's e n> "emu ........................ s,rx PUN / 'IS, C , / n -..r.r.rr... n » w »I ,» ECM[ ;,I LOT B.BfACr r or g 1 � \ / .An v. � I..... CITY CA.T6 NN�?((��r���}������jjjjP��e7 p I r �J Ey R 1 • �` � `S' •� .�.»� tgMDW TAR, f7"TL.W.J I)I`1 J C�1�G I ��6�i, \ rt% LOT A anu I BtABYRY OR.T-INTERTAI48 n coNca SNUVAIL CONPCRAO01(m 1 r ' `J \ .. /%e/ r �rax r °0 ___ .T ..gyp""^•'••"-• (p.1' CITY CASs Na Lzso0IOre A> /,. \ AAA ...- 0... - Y LOT>R SUMMARY PORT-BIBFFBYANDS or Mr J a ALLEN A;rB AIXNNON ff///lJ SYY/DIAXf N SS/AC rr.- N� r- 7 Ss ..,.. n,.a. �•" +: / PHASE I A"',.. T-A - "`= •..`•"• r ��'"` 1': CORNER ADDITION 2 .ro®c-J f..'" nw y_+ ' -+ r- Aw. n> d_: . B.R.EAVES SURVEY.ABSTRACT No.500 �xa.O F. A> 2 Iv.• ,. 'tom Toro Comma*, �'•- "••""�— p A..- A�.w�.. ,w' d-A w CITY OF SOUTNLUIE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS r ��t.. K/ Ian 2- -• pp 010W5It MOWER // .,}._�/ .•._ _ .y„ r »r °-• a CITY OP SOUTNURE RAYMOND L.GOODSON.JR..INC 1� r/ I •!� \ ww. ••••.r�..u.e...r Amid: An ggr-• » s.. wO.w...+,rr newel! d- n eOUfBLAq'.TY >laae MOW! eats G sIeRRA / `M' 2 (119)NI-seal DUSTS.T L.B.r> /d LOT R RIXX I aAIJA..TX f6ler-IfBe (202).10-8100 n / W.A..* (:la)7se-s3e0(FAX) aA1:: BINS r.uBo - PJ l'^� 1..a l City of Southlake, Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-048 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 6/02/00 Project Name: Concept Plan—Department of Public Safety West Facility, Commercial APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Phillips Swager Associates 667 North Carroll Avenue 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 670 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: 817-481-5581 X730 Phone: 214-692-6115 Fax: 817-481-0036 Attn: Garland Wilson Fax: 214-692-6118 Attn: John Main CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y * See informational comment Lighting Y Complies * The applicant has met all requirements of previous reviews. * Driveway access to this site is subject to approval of driveways associated with City Case ZA00- 047 or by other means of approved access. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-048 7F Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas ' Case No. 00-047 Review No. One Dated: 5 — 30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 2, Block 1 (Site Plan Southlake DPS West Facility) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 5 - 22 - 00. Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: * Because landscaping is subject to Site Pan approval, a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the proposed Site Plan. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan is required to be submitted with the Construction Plans when the applicant submits them for review by the Building Department to receive a Building Permit. * In the Bufferyard Summary Chart, please correct the length of the North bufferyard to reflect the entire length of the property boundary line. (564'). Please correspond the required plant material with the correction. * All interior landscape calculations are correct as shown for the current phase of development. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: * Although a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the Site Plan it will be reviewed at this time as though it is a part of the Site Plan approval. * Please correspond the Interior and Bufferyard Summary Charts with the submitted Site Plan Summary Charts. * The applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits for a majority of trees with in the bufferyard landscape areas of the site. Credits shall only be granted if the Tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined by the Landscape Administrator at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. Only existing trees which are within fifty feet (50') of the property line and have a minimum fifty percent (50%) of the drip line within a landscape area shall be granted credits toward reducing the required plantings. * The applicant is proposing to take a 20% reduction of required plant material for doubling the width of the North bufferyard, South bufferyard along Hwy. 1709, East bufferyard and West Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-048 7F Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas bufferyard. This reduction of required amounts of plant material is allowable as it corresponds to Illustration "A" of Section 42 Bufferyards of the Zoning Ordinance. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: * See attached Tree Preservation Analysis. 0 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-048 7F Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-047 Date of Review: 5 —30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 3, Block 1 (Site Plan— Southlake DPS West Facility) OWNER: PREPARED BY: City of Southlake Raymond L. Goodson. Jr. Inc. 667 N. Carroll Ave. 5445 La Sierra, Suite 300 L.B. 17 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231-4138 Phone: (817) 481-5581 Phone: (817) 739-8100 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant submitted a good Tree Survey that meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. The southern access drive from Randol Mill Ave. shows to remove eighteen (18) existing trees. Out of the total 18 trees, six (6) are dead and four (4) are protected species according to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; and eight (8) are marginal or not protected. Only one (1) of the marginal trees, a Green Ash, is considerable of preserving. The others are declining or in a hazardous state. 3. To better preserve the trees within the area of the North bufferyard, the proposed retention wall could be moved to the North side of the trees where it would not be necessary to make any grade changes between the retention wall and the North parking spaces and access drive. The wall should be constructed on the far North side of the bufferyard. 4. Out of the total 125 existing trees on the site, 40 would need to be removed for the proposed construction; leaving 85 remaining on the site. I noticed only two trees on the site that could possibly be transplanted and moved to another site. They were a 6" Cedar Elm and a 4" Pecan. The Cedar Elm is designated by the #78 on the Landscape Plan and the Pecan is not identified on the plans. 5. Although Lot 2R, Block 1 is not a part of the proposed plan, the design of the site removes the best trees on the site. Of course the trees in the middle of the lot could not be saved because they Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-048 7F Page 3 City of Southlake, Texas would be in the middle of a building. But, if the parking lot area was redesigned and grade changes kept minimal more of the specimen trees could be preserved. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this site. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Informational comments = * Observational comments = # Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-048 7F Page 4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-344 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 3, W. R. EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2833,PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS; AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2, W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500; AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.822 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 1 buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 2 other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large,the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 3 That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 4 streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 5 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 6 CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" A portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres LOT 2R, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION Being a tract or parcel of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of that tract of land conveyed to Robert G. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 3976, Page 12, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and part of Lot 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Brittain & Crawford'found for corner in the northwesterly line of Southiake Boulevard (F.M. No 1709) (a 130 foot right-of-way), said rod being the southerly common corner between Lot 1, Block 1, corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and said Brown tract; THENCE North 15°48'53" West, along the common line between said Lot 1 and said Brown tract, a distance of 207.80 feet to a chisel mark found for corner, said chisel mark being the easterly common corner of Lots 1 and 2 of said Corner Addition; THENCE North 51°04'37* East, a distance of 146.72 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG" set for corner; THENCE South 39°05'10" East, a distance of 190.47 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG" set for corner in the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard; THENCE South 50°54'50" West, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 228.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 35,813 square feet or 0.82 acres of land, more or less. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-048 7F Page 8 c ao E a nn D. v r,.i lerl ntls "Y j1 rr.• di II Pt SIM dap, Id,zrrosupos >xr`ar•xosaoo>r ryrye ol• MI anwu.1/:in } 1 --1 �.... r ^ 1-.. #t _ '�/ Q A t t_ SM.'f.LV/lOJ 1NY.NI1'rrYlHAllar le LLD r j .. „— '^ ': .. ."'�-. m -'"' • ty., jj 009 1 JO. .:MVOS S11.'.'. S .' .-. e� n.... -... ti w ,- .... -�... r�.cs ri an V•.• Ir' o-..v NOLLIOT'89NFfQ7 '"'Jn: .—'•. ".�« ....,.�. l — .-; .'". .. a«sseeo YMtlivwros / v:''. //,r 'a , aroma ox MID uo 9 on.nur-1.0,ww.s ti lm -..`.: . N' :-: : --"+. ^ ar,o, \ '� w a r o r ovs yr.m a0 • .,,,...1' ,. �,� �w Ana Ttw.enw-id.a.r,..a 1�Ds1 Viol \ •••y:'/,'��� 000a 1 o Nnrro raT��SOKOO . .��. _ - - s:.. nm.'r.o] +r• f .w>fr.,win.-..rb a�a-+C,e ia'" a ; �.: .�• ; ``Y '� NV7d X US �` ........,,..�.�..� .g"� L"'..—. 1= .. /:,.. rn �. AIMS,MAIM.-!>. 3..'J.OYII IDtllw-11/MD♦IM.f 11Da1 T lal T la/6 rpDe Lr•ad M1/6.17 Mk 4212.).J. Artl.6,gang.* y% IO)a !O)t Y0,aam..A rww LOYsa MOW CZ > r =,. v. jiips41:iiri..'1.11:::_zzr .. ,D0.'6 Di SnYSII—iD1.VA.'.1.Iws ....I. rr,•APSZerd:maws wldDor , ;b„Y y T .6eMA L9.wr snfu N .rw.cn>i,Yia ��/d� * '6 Dlu,rw.1/..IIN 6 cold,.EY.=7na a0 0w, I 6 a.r:mow 6(WT.01•1Y2Y1A \ // 1 • �pd4� *`� i;y uI6 fLf 1 w er .Js'loop /..r/6Lora n.w.l m/6War .. sr6.06.av 3/• d�..\`� +'++(�%�.-gyp'4r.e.. ,`'i. ''y.ate/6 w.a n.w1 are/6(Lfu e1 ..sv..Im 6s 1'1' jfr/ �' ' • F ft/IF t/y� 6forll .0INA DJlor/A SAN�ziwv �.n .'ml. � lIv U1�r19 .,. •. ,"�� •,-_ MN[YA551JWYX3( +•V `' �IF+1 mmo DINO a+wnnr ./ ( �'1^ V" "yY. ��a14CI�1! I ►IL dal LL 7.. av,.r mold.1}1' eo....011.awr ,m.T La, -. /,OW. 1 i' pry wmiw 'neL'vy ate..ii or i-i awl,0560.04,vDi /' or "�p, ;�p4' / -j�`i~ iie i .m.s./Mao....v C% 1 rrv3s wvL�Dwro .asl,anr�yrm \ / •" \ �a� :', . i I 1 .aliaoQ;sr'ea = 44 N Ny rAm er:o, r;. • ..... .. �F��yy1 la AYYIA'6 Y�ro 2115 I "•% .. •. ..^ it ;1 �..�r = R, ao I^I .-no mows0 aa..n wr. r,asv _ �1 1 •.� A _ �" . F mwne ssr.Si Dnas seem ON 014447010 3w'wms / ,v, `::.et. 7 : f' ® 1 i 1 1 I ,m1tl., •, .� j�1}�a a _ 11 .._..▪ _ •aa-.l_c aysoiwror /INN 3. /. / 1j11 /,..r.a. .v a�'Z"�� ��� 1s,�; .1'1 1 I LIT tZVIZ r� �M05A L, / __,...!,,,;;,,,;,..6\`� .400711 AdfllS-l ♦, y,.0• 9MMY6, fy 7•, I I 1 • 1,I a p / . .• f f• aaoew S. a Ln3 'ice 1 WI lour▪ __ . �°1iik f ;Anus r io] .'°� -*N. ' kph j Sr sous near 017J37 '1�/•'`'�`!�O Yas-Le �w �csoi'Q�' .�. i:.. . 1l1�N� .n:1L.IPA/A . • . ..,3"+:� '.m :r ;F.-..., 0 ryl ,•� E lD ;.+' r.,w • II 1.�+,;s'°� '. 44 011114��' "4 .•'' — , ems""' ' e _ —T— N wow 1 Y ^••o r.....:;mrl.wtl ,,I Um11YN�^" �,�'..-u Cnr.vru v.V IUB F naum�aos nw ++�r ^�i / I sxbri�onewx 1 I �i K M 531h S 1 d��j1 ��VBii'1Y I mo^• p i..nsruays_ { 1 E I I� p w D �Ykwin.4J^ `` I /7317 SA.KII07[1S�� P♦ c I I 1 ,J oo © z7 CeS U N City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT • July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-064 PROJECT: Bicentennial Park ORDINANCE NO: 480-345 REQUEST: On behalf of The City of Southlake, Cheatham and Associates is requesting site plan approval to address new outside storage requirements and new lighting at Bicentennial Park. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading of the rezoning request and associated site plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Ordinance No. 480-345 • (F) Letters from Neighboring Property Owners (G) 11"x17" Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) • Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-064 7G City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: City of Southlake APPLICANT: Cheatham and Associates PROPERTY SITUATION: This request is for the addition of coke vending machines at three locations and new lighting for the baseball fields, north of the tennis courts, at Bicentennial Park. The park is situated on 61 acres north of F.M. 1709 between North White Chapel on the east and Shady Oaks Drive on the west. The park is currently developed with office housing the Community Services Department for the City,baseball fields, tennis courts, skating area and other recreational uses. Currently there are residential uses located to the north, northwest and northeast of the park and retail/commercial uses adjacent to the park at the southeast and southwest corners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Public Parks/Open Space CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and"S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage NOTICES: Thirty-five (35) notices were sent Letters with In Favor Opposed Undecided comments attached Within 200 Notification Area 1 3 1 5 Outside 200 Notification area Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-064 7G Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas P&Z ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 8, 2000, and: • Allowing the proposed lighting and with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; • Allowing relief on the plantings in the bufferyard and interior landscape areas for existing improvements only; and • Allowing relief from the Residential Adjacency Standards for existing improvements only. COUNCIL ACTION: On first reading, the Council approved (6-1) this plan, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, and granting the variances allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and allowing the vending machines with the screening shown on the attached exhibits. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2,2000.No changes have been made since 1st reading. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-064SPnew.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-064 7G Page 2 . Vicinity Map Bicentennial Park a■■ - _ /''1�;,�iNi■ iii it* i q H — - moo■■■■/ . , �■nra., ' �� ■■moo ..qr bi i x BELM TrlfrT �,; III . �M�' iii 1 re m e -7,-41fil 2 1111111 .-vrat imutes aNMUW SibignII4111.1 jew411,01",,,Apri, 'V riWillftri 1111111771TIMMTIII Ono Ma III NON/MIMI '%,um JZTyr.y WW,c ;y� . /1 R ,7 _—�IIIIIIII`� ,ImusurmanotWwR : unu. NMI �D 1V i �:Div. `�m N 1��■■■■1.NW NIlk�11■11111■i/.d. 1111►.ii/2 DC:� �r 4,1�1}� *�E l r.�Iaa sAka Ovum I� �� 11� / aefrp. i .._ �� tsum111 ■o �11_:i L IP'-'14PINE e 111 I oaf iA 41cli1-ps.I0o0.0 r1 % ■�ii v s—iuitngr heP* 7- m11...'.16= mi ■ff no,..t.��:���IrU� �/ r■a�S'�� • w1 111AM �� 7��AT y71 r/ ■�,, tea! - �� • ‘ ♦ V will/ i. \IIPM' �--i0PI Igith;*1.:,;■■IEII 1'''�.♦;a►0,�♦r�ir�� �a■re ��j .T37:,,, .J11►►1:rr.IIIIr Mr •\�7\�a 1%Ate= v �I��j♦ ` ��rrn Int, 4 ■ OCIrrir- rn. ToTR79 11111067111 Ai��e/pm Im�El li ��\1#lt -■, �i L,^��U MI EST I■■■■■om I M,14 i ►a..a om_� -■I�� +��y!/ a�WM _ 11�/ �'�);� ■ orm l■ii '4\din. °C.gig Am fell 2000 0 2000 Feet jf W /r E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-064 7G Page 1 II i• CONED Tract1•Y I SOTNLYE STATES \ Y001E]II-iS.DARE I.MILTIJ E 7`ftOLOD DP 3 -I — GREEN OAKS LANE ' eir fors_ �I'� ___LW._ Inn ImB MISSION HILL ESTATES - Q IY,»La.» ••"'•�.✓— I III I OAR N LL ESl1TE II I I VOLOIE 3ee-1 sa. PAGE Bl.PRTCT .,1 R.WON OAKS DRIVE Lm n IN DOMED v-IA Tract x�.t 511 + y//, LA IS �'11I MET•A..,E{"u.,IDE S nlTCT Lw�yl AM aLLLiK2LAE z,„ ' `R r I LOT n W LOT a y..(F�A" I LDI N IV u I Iw u ( WI Is \ Lw u - LOT.,. TOM 31111 13 LAAw6••K•'w 88 1 ES 201E0 SF-1• Swi»AK[.n KMi1. _ .m I ?Er -. .::,:..'•: �N �..•-.-.-/— fie' .'11' �Jf us nLxm.c.e N»»•..4 ---- -- — �13w LI — ZV�39:A DRIVE II,N.SRAM OARS DRIVE - - _ ,_ Tract x-m..54C cocas ION o..xa I /i�i •-, '° „ �. � I -fc ".I - °l+'i r 1 _ .r L- YOL.aSal.Po.l1xYTEII ai�4�L1. Tract 311 € 2»N.'vuoi"DF's'"sonlK iLwo'6 NESTgOOIs '� •D ,� Ali. L sTE.At �i E � iYs' I `SOEDrsi-1A SOIMAKE.ri 160fx �1 • sT•E V- - t LWKOR !E 1•R PAVILION 1a 1° .V.A. • .w1 �-I �� ' T- �` L..1.wm. •...cit.,. MAIL WIVE I.w,' + ]IS R.SNUT OAKS DRIK iOED AG N,A rr.n»-mn sa LAD«M f.l.. / 0 N.lr ` II j/ , 1 I III I i :11 IIII WLMPH FOAMS IMA FYAM Tr.xA !II p L° o. I // 1Pe ..'1. v[0 Y-11 ,N.01.OAKS DRIVE - I // 130 La 1A LLwtiM Ira.la. STsa11111ME.1x MOVE I . \� O • ° II// I�. U cm» '�.I 1 F•rf 1 m `3`I a I , I TH�F IRST INSTAL LEIENT45 AIII°�I DIAMDND CIRCLE E57ATE_Li FyGnfiT- ALEYPYfr GRAPHIC SCALE a.RALPN175 PH,.IY.L11•A s.Er.c Jf:1. rn e, 21s R.sw2T oui Da1K « - SOIIMAKE.n 502E - I y4, _ ••� «,,. �t , xal[D Y .. . r.wttr.0 Lc«n.; I VIREO Y-1A Lori DD.-R n«..m. 11 1 lilt .1011. Lor s ADVENTURE T sT. ° � .s: AN °�EI.M 11 LA, C/2.s1tO17 DAKs DRIVE _` • f"% xe9•s�'n•E vuroaosslaAOs WARE LUOPPOs u.:..m. iiii ii x N.C•RR¢L AK Gat E AVE Sl 200 ii MO DRAINAGE CNAIIEL e® e ® am 'f' / / iwiw 1 - • .NIL AKS.: ft. !1: / .5.27eID1•E LOT x.ama /. no sxnr ors oRiK -. - RI ys SP9'O3'S6'C 171.11' I • l �� raver aiK ulw m n. I -„1 6' .:` %/ ® III I O o W / a ro'uEE ILF K sn x.. ZIT.'n :ai j •••r.oT.L: V. SIIS.r.AS _ 11 ',rocs A. 1 • „ •. .H.. �� LOTS 2.3.1 L.B.G.HALL AODI TON = / Len..am /Lm I.am a 1 I ' I 1 1 • ` Cab. A. SI Ida 1216. PRTCT V LOEO 51 IA IOIEo F.-1♦ . {I LUD40P .I I �\� OO - 9--�,1 ", mI' REMAINDER LOT 2 W \.__ LCON I ST LIDKg1 / 1 �\ T SECOND STALLMENT IDW L110 Sp-2 i yl `�' 6'1 ' G=t9•N'11' s•-.E�,+r 'BI a® IJ .®_•'_® ® C, uorlc DI DCI LE ESTATES L&l` 6 Y�` .1 I` 12C.60yy ° VOLUME\3 181. PAGE 69. RTC' "•r"1 ill" I LCB 3J LCB=509.53'02•E 1� 6,I e I` `--_ lc- lc=1ie.ow Q Q 1.�•11 rs•wlos. •s J - / GA V.Tr. AA NB7.21'S2'll -- `°� •� I I eNe9'S1'93'E 390.55' ;Id ~ Lon s.em al � eL.E.D_�m Soot»ARE MAR IME511011 •' 700.12' N,•,. �_ - I (,.,['�■� s F F ; Jf}1 AM MEET i A i-.11L-7. �:k F�• ''4kNNE / LDT 1 i ( xaEO Ct 1I - ^'o • tDO.L1'1 .r..<wx _1 nw_� Llnbc i e Lue10A.11 IaDao - LOT I MITI o�•m ` SB9' �I r I I�� FIRST API<'A1 sAV BII1011 3 ,mn 3 t 7 LateS'r'T`'' 20E0 Cx NIP LOT 2 " ��I al0 R«SWxLr u'c L-- j11-a. GMItEI 1.S%IOE ISri. r 1 I LL».0 L=DKD Cx ` 'a'iiii.ry ail ( 1•�m uwrlc Mf �1nic •$s rn.Iz5s1.P1.Isx 1i iL, q=565965 9• 1 �++- zaEO D, c• i ItW I III AxOD 4lAS P oAAo '�'AND xIL• Al LCB.373.16, . J I I- ;- Ll•oc L•O SOUTNLARE OARS A. Sl iCal231 I Id wlh a 1AK - •.rles• •NN "0"I'•T r D.RILL 9Rw1 7' 'q _ L _ -- III oyuus.n u• am 1 �� LC=377.tp'� I N =1.1t� - Ez Ywn•.MI >� II. — III W�SF I le '7091e--s ;t E s .ITTLEBERRY I.. ------� Y (F J.Y.SRK.SIw SUM b Um C. G. HALL SUAVE - • ..' , „-. "e' AR0 N.coa NIRAM GgANBERAY SWVEV- •.6 HLA � LE L•.,.,. . � MAY 2 6 200 .t 1.» K 0U V Ave»m 0 ».•1J'»t »s.»• No.Set••'�_:.-;-�.� - 5 m � L.-_-�- iaED US: 1 e•�9• `. Fa ORK� •-•r'�x LnEo a L�r -- um.u. 11680 80M 80l suRct ��E to I... q 4 VCJ gbC illR. 1 Q5 TOED a1 Moot 1.:a�;1' G MVETfRI�ND tIFFe w Yn..Y, /� • SI����S PLAN PARK 5y ';', AO,.lonErE AN TOEO CT .-- CURIA J.LECA.ER OEAl11A11 A ASSOCIATES Cln of aorniAKE 610ENTENIAL lwa•R « N• R:w4..�'O.iII'faI r s 101 NAM srENEA nuCN Idol E.LYMR aw.SUITE 200 NIT M.CANAL!.MOM -T y, s L OW 1 NNET IOwO DEeCN ARLIIrtIY.TERAs TEO,s sOSILLII{E.TEXAS TWSE OExK a1.a1 I Jwf slTwTm SE TIE yt�..II •3 ' D Y 20 I Nw w1 i I E.. .EOa1QR•• nAwYrtER Aro wn11A J.LEDEER Ma-0EN MI�MI.1.RN l!D Tye*COMM IOIKMs SY EMI ... CI DeDan+J L19 p101 :•� It aam aMITIE.n TIaM ¢R I.amars a ri a 11C•D'r'rM C•Yn�A'Sa 0011 SJMMw FCWfI i t5 N'EMY L\ .1.t.Sill I.'RIM A[,n .I nli WE Ow L co-0M NIT I .. IL l 1 • !:. . ..P. 41 :410,I fi•1.It II • ' ii 1 t 1 I 4 y., it i• I II ,,,. I 1.1 ..! .! , .'I III ; Il; .0 ."-.' :..•.•.•••a..... .I• I . I ,.. .1.11•I A. I ila .t: II' cr, ... al J..ly . 1 II trallartaura; in unsure arm ';... mill c ;., ''' '''"' 11 - ' .• l'i ll''Man SCUM.IIIVICE '-11 le mai Kamm cal .,.. . ,, I1 ,...........0.1111. 111 i 11 I 1. ........,.... .... I •! .A . .. .... ,. ...... ". .'6, -•-• II a' / I -,--"iti. .Nii-.: r..law um,. I " ......... .$14 'Lidi R.- so.,, .......----, • . -,1 ....1 .... , „ ; .... „ „ 114 •I. a I I:- CONCESSION '.'" "Ail aI 'it I I MM.. , '• '''''' ' NESTHOONS f ,• IL. 6. PAV IL ION •• '- i4 'PA 4-.'.- •.-•t• I I :' , ••41'11 I I.I - . . • . ••.Ar.VIM•rf reseatz rail' . ,, I . 1 I 1 f I.i., ,,,,,,,,•,,, o..EP ,..., AIIIMAll I • i A t 1,LI. a 1 I 1111 .' ' I i .7.,,: L _ "'" .! , . . I 11 II LIP I ---...,.. - is • . c: W:11730if 11111781 i_. 3 VHS I N slEANIFINI 1 II , ...... ,• .. . . , It,..1 •.,.It 4 V 1.1. 141 !Ii!•1. N ,..., to:11! I I',. . nail tr• 1/1 i ;;, rill I II ; III I••./..,I t ; \ tb MYliblei..10 A _i .„ ., ,„.,, . , ,„... ,II•11 l 7 it I I r _.,---_,L,s. . •• . . = ..".".:::: fi I 1 """'' 1 ,•.. ,. . .. .., I I 3 g, witami iiia '11 CO,',Arum =, me 1.•l ..I ! , II •''',.“.''.1.'- '.l Si i WI t•--• i. ..,Ili ,,L ! ....,_,,, GRAPH IC SCALE - .... '-. ...•-•.-, - II[ ''''" t. 1 1 la;14. tit All It 6 ." "' :'. / V .1 I I I ; ? •••" • I '.! tiCi I ! tli• ' , 1 \ I -41 ty, ',. i ADVENTURE ALLEY PL AY+CIIIND I : -1- , •41 ,I wiliiii,--,,.., ' in .--:-... :::1: ':wit4'• I t 1 . .000"Elii t"-- .ttttt E.47'": ?;',. 4:;.•4-`i-Ftg-..i!...... 1 i i• Y MIA ' I . li ..., I • • • "I" :If: ..+•• -.Lt.,..ti.:.: • • - 'z'?ii 41 tiri ::•:;i1±:t;.1.1.''.,.!ib' . . _ 3es• r.r.e. .4::: =.... ......... .., ::..!...c? a ';• ::.... 4'' ..,,!,I'it ..P.'",...1:'.!' :•15:'''1,..,. I TR, . • ui rl . 7-7-'1, ..', DRAINAGE CHANNEL ----------- " .... " .. ..4.i . ].'ir7; .1.:i: i. I i 1 F;i14::4-2...sz ...-2„, ioi... to•wurnruwzari•• ), '- al ''''. 4-:: 4 k.. :i i Soft Di-in k I r PIM AMAMI INVICE l• .. A• ,..... . .1, F _0. ..z..„,..., ,a6, , I'lltpslia ............i _„...:.........:„.... 1 I I 1; Ili i.1 "e I • •, ,, •....tt.1.:rt. 6111 1.1.1 III i Vending Machine lop,..wi, , ,,, - . oi - .. • --- 1 51 ,. Locations •ONCIETE SINAILII • • . .• t 1 1 . f g1,1P. . . • so, ,• 11:0111 O. • • I l. .Ii.Vili ii, L i ••••••,-.44i,OM • Tals11447,4.1" i .N‘k1/4 i.. 0 . -,-..T. :.,,,. ,,,...,,"..., I • .:,.. . . . . .. .. .., 11.....Mai. .. . . ,r k ! \ YilliPlia 11 1 ..F [ i 1 .. •0.,It or; ir•tli '... . 1. ?:ii r.11.1 1. li i 1.1 i 111 ,, , ... , . -. .1..”,•.. .616IIK,I 11 I .1 1 1/11 1-.11 114."6.41.. l I I '.',. 1. .. . .0...I.(,a .'II .' , :' '''*'""..:?:...'''•.I: '/ I., I I rvi I W.44. f 1 I 166'1' IS,,,f..III I LT.IIi., , I.1/6.01 1 . .....______.,. .- / 115 • .•..' I j ' " .;.• . I, , ! ..-' ! ' 11 mow ___----- -imam.i . ;;;• t.. .t H., 4 i ..• ...... I:I r..........•'----:-."./.._,:-1:::::: • .. , rxr.. .1 I LIT -.1 rr'101.• If I ! i'4.,.... h..,1:4Fr,1"'. 1110r;..TO1:1•4 SLIFIVOTOR-FiCIfiff Fe .... -...•,.••. to.4, I. ill,ill HI MI,! 4...1..o 1. ...... al 1 ;A.....Mk f.''' ....t . it ot.• ,l.. ..:.• $m=1) 1.6.VI li .r-:••;"' III.-.,.,..k„t ya:_.:'F',Fli!r''.,''I.-.')• r....,.''•I•.•4••1io1..r.1+.'•1 IF'• I.•'L:".'.:•";11'1.h•;eI.L"rI...r-r il.'.I.irt."4'..'. •'s..u.i'n•f'l..'•' ' •• , 'clmaMWotI lkiI So1M1,44-02411.M•-••13 oCFMAL O.F4.1111-1161411211441.-A1.l.1l14 1 VS• Ci SN rim 0 LL I BICENTENIAL PA W.? ' ,1/ r II !.. , •f Ottatl, ma CafI• daOF.F -0 1 / :•• W IT It21 I 1•1* WC L.1.• n-sax pr, orc/ cD •••r•• t., n City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-064 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 06/02/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Bicentennial Park APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Cheatham and Associates 667 N. Carroll Avenue 1601 E. Lamar Blvd,#200 Southlake, TX 76092 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: 817-481-5581 x756 Phone: 817-548-0696 Fax: 817-421-2175 Attn: Ben Henry Fax: 817-265-8532 Attn: Gordon Johns CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 753. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 4,no new construction proposed. Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No.4,no new construction proposed. Building Articulation Y See Comment No.4,no new construction proposed. Masonry Standards Y See Comment No. 4,no new construction proposed. Building materials are not provided on this site plan. Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 3 Interior Landscape Y See Comment No. 3 Driveways Y Existing,no new construction proposed. Lighting Y See Comment No. 1 Outside Storage Y See Comment No.2 1. The following changes are needed regarding proposed lighting: a. All exterior lighting shall comply with Lighting Ordinance 693-B. This plan proposes adding lighting to baseball fields #4, #5, and #10, located just north of the tennis courts. The photometric lighting plan indicates that the average light level will be 34 footcandles. The proposed luminaries are metal halide (white light) as compared to the high pressure sodium light (yellow light) specified in the lighting ordinance (See attached memo from Chuck Bloomberg, Plans Examiner, dated May 25, 2000). The metal halide lights (white light) are preferred on the baseball fields for safety reasons. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00:Allow as shown) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-064 7G Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas b. Remove lighting comments within the "S-P-1" regulations on page 2. Lighting is not included within the zoning regulations, however, it can be considered with the Site Plan 11 review. 2. Ordinance 480, § 45.11.9 requires vending machines be wholly contained within the principle building and shall not be permitted outdoors. This plan proposes outdoor vending machines and outdoor storage as accessory uses. There are 6 soda vending machines on the site (2 machines are beside the pavilion at the baseball complex, 2 machines are located beside the restrooms near the softball complex and 2 machines are located near the in-line hockey area-See attached Soft Drink/Vending Machine location map). Additionally, there are miscellaneous outside storage areas for maintenance equipment etc. located on the site. Applicant is requesting to add the vending machines and continue the other outside storage areas as existing. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00: Denied variance for outside vending machines--Approved variance for existing outside storage) 3. Show all required bufferyards and interior landscaping as required by ordinance. No bufferyards or interior landscaping are shown on this plan. The charts have been provided, however no plantings are proposed. The applicant is requesting relief from providing any plantings except as they currently exist. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00:Allow as shown) 4 . Construction shall comply with the Residential Adjacency Standards, the Corridor Overlay Zone, Screening Requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Masonry Ordinance, No. 557. It appears by the proposed regulations, the applicant is requesting relief on all or part of these • regulations. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00:Allow as shown) 5. All existing structures and improvements shall be shown, dimensioned and labeled on the plan. 6. The front building lines along Shady Oaks and White Chapel shall be 30' consistent with the "CS" zoning. Correctly show the 50' building line along F. M.1709 and the 25' side building lines, west of the "A. Pardue tract". P&Z Action: June 8, 2000:Approve (3-1)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, as noted above, and subject to the following: • Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; and • Delete Item #3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping)for existing improvements only; and • Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards)for existing improvements only. III Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-064 7G Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas CC 1st Reading: June 20, 1000:Approve (6-1)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, and granting the variances allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and allowing the vending machines with the screening shown on the attached exhibits. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Ben Henry, City of Southlake VIA FAX: ABOVE Gordon Johns, Cheatham and Associates VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-064-SP#2-BiCentenPark.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-064 7G Page 3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM May 25, 2000 TO: Ken Baker, Planner, Community Developmant FROM: Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner, Building Services SUBJECT: Bicentennial Park, Case No. ZA00-064 Ben Henry submitted a lighting plan for T-Ball fields 4, 5 and 10 developed by Musco Sports Lighting Inc. The existing park lighting was designed prior to the lighting ordinance. The baseball fields were designed to have an average lighting level of 50 footcandles. This request is to add lighting for these fields. It has been designed to provide at least 30 footcandles because not as much light is required for play at this level. The calculations show the average light level works out to 34 footcandles. The number has to be more than the design standard but as close to it as can be accomplished with standard equipment. Given these lighting fixtures the darkest spot on the field will have a rating of 21.37 footcandles and the brightest spot will have a rating of 54.59 footcandles at the exact beam center. All of these numbers are based on seasoned luminaires. During the break in period they burn somewhat brighter. The proposed luminaires are metal halide that emit a very white light compared to the high pressure sodium lights specified in the lighting ordinance. The hps lights are more energy efficient but colors are harder to distinguish under them. Xc Paul Ward Malcolm Jackson Ben Henry Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-064 7G Page 4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-345 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2R2, L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDES 5299 & 5300, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND TRACTS 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, AND 3D6, SITUATED IN THE LITTLEBERRY G. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 686, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 61.61 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, "C- 2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, AND "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH LIMITED "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE LIMITED OUTSIDE STORAGE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 2 the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage as depicted on the approved Site Plan and Development Regulations attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 4 SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 5 SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being several tracts of land situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract 686, and also being a portion of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition,to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas(PRTCT), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point for the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake,as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1325, PRTCT, said point also being in a curve to the right in the north right-of-way line of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709),said curve to the right having a radius of 5659.58 feet and a central angle of 03 deg 46 min 40 sec, with a long chord bearing S84°34'12"W, a distance of 373.09 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said right-of-way curve an arc length of 373.16 feet to a point for the southeast corner of Woodland Hills RSU Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 608, PRTCT; THENCE N 00°00'39"W, along the east line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet,to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87°24'49"W, along the north line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet,to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 00°00'39"W, along the east line of a tract of land by deed to Arch Purdue as recorded in Volume 12651, Page 152, DRTCT, a distance of 68.76 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87°24'49"W, along the north line of said Purdue tract, a distance of 271.58 feet,to a point for its northwest corner, said point being at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 380.00 feet and a central angle of 19 deg 24 min 14 sec, with a long chord bearing S09°53'02"E, a distance of 128.08 feet; THENCE southerly, along said curve to the right, an arc length of 128.69 feet to a point for corner in the west line of said Purdue tract; THENCE S 01°10'55" E, a distance of 106.66 feet,to a point for corner in the north right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709); THENCE S 87°37'01"W, along said north right-of-way line of F.M. 1709 a distance of 112.33 feet,to a point for the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1,Southlake Oaks Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, PRTCT; THENCE N 00°10'55"W, a distance of 101.76 feet,to a point for the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 270.00 feet and a central angle of 22 deg 56 min 13 sec, with a long chord bearing N11°39'00"W, a distance of 107.37 feet; THENCE northerly, along said curve to the left, an arc length of 108.09 feet to a point for the northeast corner said Lot 2; THENCE N 87°24'52"W, along the north line of said Lot 2 and Lot 1, and continuing a distance of 780.42 feet,to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE N 04°10'37" W, a distance of 274.34 feet,to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89°03'56" E, a distance of 714.41 feet,to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438, Page 2287, DRTCT; fr:CD MAY 2 3 2000 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE N 00°10'56" W, a distance of 1165.42 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89°01'08" E, a distance of 579.33 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE North, a distance of 22.73 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of Lot 20, Oak Hill Estates Adition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 683, PRTCT; THENCE S 89°10'10" E, a distance of 1303.14 feet,to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 4928 , Page 733, DRTCT, said point being in the west right-of-way line of North White Chapel Boulevard; THENCE S 01°22'40" W, along said west right-of-way line a distance of 805.58 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to EPIPD- Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT, THENCE N 89°48'11" W, a distance of 518.15 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to EPIPD-Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT; THENCE S 01°10'23" W, a distance of 99.63 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of said EPIPD- Crossroads Square tract; THENCE N 89°54'33" W, a distance of 22.79 feet,to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13749, Page 81, DRTCT; THENCE S 00°04'36" E, a distance of 184.14 feet, to a point for corner in the north line of a of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT; THENCE N 89°28'01" E, a distance of 25.27 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT, said point being in the west line of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, PRTCT; THENCE S 01°11'27" E, a distance of 314.83 feet, to a point for the southeast corner of a said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT, said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1325, PRTCT; THENCE N 89°51'43" W, along said First American Savings Banc Addition, a distance of 390.55 feet to a point for its northwest corner; THENCE S 00°41'30" W, a distance of 250.24 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 61.61 acres of land, more or less. F:\WORD\Southlake\941\PROPO DESC.wpd- 29NOV99 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 9 N n • w o ,T ofD • A L1'•o10r''' R.[,..--15'POOL TES \ ._.« ��. __-_.o.,_ •� — \--+��•-1 II Li --,«.---•I u�� I GREEN OAKS LANE 111 wlSSI HILL ESTATES —+.i- p I I` / II .aUE IErl9s.PAGE 16.PRTCT ere.661 • 1� 065 11-06 y1K w' J MIT M;li Hi.106 m,...f,.6,. P /' 1 N,N 1 ..,,174; 1 » .,, I .r I .,, N uoia' _ — —se+ •.•„ '., 1.4 1a ..,a. a ,..,,..a1A DRIVE m.XNNn 065.1.E �..„.4 ,..» �___i - T, - ^4 ��s_ i.:u-.:,,,;Ay CONCESSION ' El iii ,.r:y v1 511101 . 1. ri 124. L...: '"om...R .. PAVILION Presss, . .., U — II .••••••-••••••• 1 ( eel Gu I Uq -n::.,tgl LPF / E I I I OP 1 N Tr....,6...t I- ,� ,I I / ..a, • lit 1 I THE FIRST INSTALLMENT , , GIAwOfq C RCLE ESTATE —� .� • _ V VOLUIE 30-111.PAGE .PRTLN' 1 0,•...am �.' •▪•,-- BROMIC SCN-E s. aew s.cr..s I .'f+. • " •. a _ 1'' .,‘' - -� ........ 1 _ gL... 0, s c1 R 064 ovam.E ALLEY PHICITNEITill J4L 'A 5�++� f- �.I/�/� _ iT _ I I =�.:C.� x I� .� r AB' Ili / ► ){ _-,.___ _ --- _ _ . r-' er ll•. — —T ......a. z u .:i V - .` — __ Eli — • is n I _ _ I.�-y ,,,n DRAINAGE CNAISEL • Q -'^.t:':.' __ — -- ®®. ® EI�u-� , — W 9.21 01'E Mil 'i r..,L."1 89 • 'O9'9E•E 711.11' • �. )�)� . /. o,.,RI :_.I ,«...ar.• w i Ala•' �' 1DI \ ✓ '. ft .011111.al � I •f LCSS •A.,slid.12 LPRAAG T� C=i / Y.•� ' '�iII \\\ • Yiv 0 • EE-T'{� pm 'If REWAI�NDER LOT 2 T SECOND INYTALL1ENr /q, ' s'I' �• 2I'Is' ��-P' v ®V j®® ' I - DI C LE ESTATES % 1% 1 LA-IA 021 +•I /' VOLUME 7 -1 ll.PAGE 69. RTC `I _ .�.�—_ Lc. «.1:E.oe• 0 0 i�z.►'.y.�\ �.os..,.•^ - III / - I MA..DOM a.160 vs I wi•a si1T'-- ---- .\\ �` '8 '� I I E9•SI'aY!! 71G.s'/' I / sass.N� 66611100 710.12' \ �=- .All I .. ._. v� / LGi 1 (w..r ie�a ,.,,..MOWN r \\ r au.''d-PI I .P� ��]1rI i.eL IM�� 11164.TA M L G Ali Lm 2 ��• A; iL, 1•yl»,R.ro.,;ro Se9• 46 • , I I�j FIRST�11IL'�L s..l�ll—es 1. w...a 'n.... uoMc E. pro •4'.r I ,ray -- :'f;i: " '16'1C' a,.na. "7rla .� ,.Nea .^a 1.'R:" .... x1,.M1.,u R= 99.9 I CR ter" — »,, • EI sGI7rMLARE.Ass�IA,afzsr III d•oo e"p.Lu"i:... LC!:siiiifiz'r J I '^' �.,, Y9� a — 1 — >Q= — _ I $R.'.N,.', �'� i LC=373,._J9 I i .m M- T E.r �..n.1.y"E. �o of RE.Ii R. iN •� I11 I. L. ---6-- C 1 - ) ,�L' E ,rift-LITTL[ AGEL . —^ -- N' 1.; a. ' lF 17� — -- — — SOUT11f/IKEVARD '� N maw s.(1n� MAY L��I N.C.,N1R.N.l..ERR.5MMEY-ysTRACT N6.501-i-.o-. s r-- ----- Tw,1. -A-RECD 1.AY N O 2000 -•.s1 was. - MOM 01 t ..: �% `l Iw.O01 lsn sg H1E W SI[IS11C TVI.E4` er a< M1' .z9..aArBICENTENIAL PAW( i ei�..w' ♦ 1a'. Z. `y(, .�} J....e. ,.i�1 ` ,,;,n. .N..NR:�. ga-r��9E�,oE�L. Wi ..,..u:: ::�I.� Ep1�NE.fE.1 q T rIFEr , f.s.021114:11171 awn.riw -II.. J.�' wA. 1 n.v1x� n,7.o �,rlieT.1�R'•�'i+e.. O.IEIR:'O IAN Trrwr mrrt. p.I Pt Pi.AN L*NM m•NAMILILIV. n CD e-s- 0 N.r N n tv o In CZ ON H co 0 co Title of Project: Bicentennial Park Case No. ZA 00-064 0 ao Regulations Comments ,• rD I Permitted Uses Same as CS iv 2 Accessory Uses Same as CS,and adding lighted tennis courts,lighted vo baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales, soo __ 1 practice fields,outdoor vending,outside storage. 3 Specific Use Permits Same as CS ccoo 4 Development Regulations Same as CS,except no interior landscaping or ' x bufferyards&planting are required. r x C. • 4.1 Height _Same as CS • o 54..) 4.2 Front Yard 25 foot width,except 50 ft.along west Southlake a y no Boulevard(FM 1709). bd 4.3 Side Yard 25 foot width o 4.4 Rear Yard 25 foot width ..• crQ 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS p., co c 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS co 4.7 Additional Development Regulations No residential adjacency standards apply. No screening External lighting will be directed away from for building uses lying within 400 feet device required adjacent to residential zoning. No residential property. co of single family residential zoning. corridor overlay standards apply. Building and additions attached thereto may emulate existing co construction materials,surfaces,and architectural style. c/o I':WORD-Sou hlaL'Q4I'SI'I Regulations wpd C. eaCA A w R CD C EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-064 7G Page 12 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-064 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B,_1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B,2A1, 2B 1, 3C, 3D, 3D 1 A,and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. A Site Plan for Bicentennial Park will be considered with this request. *his property is located on the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. The request is being submitted by the Applicant, Cheatham and Associates. The Owner of the property is the City of Southlake. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. The Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with"CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. A public hearing will be held by the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday, June 8, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter, it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake,Texas, 76092. REFEREN ,:ZA 00-064 I am n avor of) ';(opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: _4 *M a-t F Az. ry i A V O P OF d t; ES1 c 4 -o L''k% tt.11)]71 •jei , QRcF'EP:I re P R£"TM�iL. e�M'Et).CiA2,, SIGNATURE: L va r 5 - 7 V," .1" / (Please Print Name) S w A .t F 12z-,z, ADDRESS: (76 _S -r4 A-P-fil l iC 76 6 ic • ,• f:b 1,y ZOOG qL PHONE: Ri 7— 4 ?1 — 6 3 3 6 P 7 7 3/1l w eRk ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEENS(ifv-f) VIA REGULAR MAIL AND RTIFI D MAIL*** Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-064 7G Page 1 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-064 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1 B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1 E, 2B,2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D,3D1A,and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. A Site Plan for Bicentennial Park will be considered with this request. This property is located on the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709)generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. The request is being submitted by the Applicant, Cheatham and Associates. The Owner of the property is the City of Southlake. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. The Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with"CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. A public hearing will be held by the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday, June 8, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter, it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake, Texas, 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-064 —----- I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) .the request for the following reasons: l • /f's x/fit,- �✓�T� ' ) i S LJ 1 C j 4-,(s • SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ' , t v.A►i.� �` i rJ ( iC CtruiUk ;l .. '� � ADDRESS: `t C C. �4�Lti - S L_�J . PHONE: 1 `)-' 4 J—(J j easW 4S NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT VIA MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL**Attachment F ZA00-064 7G Page 2 ' REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-064 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B,2A1, 2B1, 3CL3D, 3D1A,and 3D6. situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. A Site Plan for Bicentennial Park will be considered with this request. This property is located on the north side of West Southiake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. The request is being submitted by the Applicant, Cheatham and Associates. The Owner of the property is the City of Southiake. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. The Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. A public hearing will be held by the City of Southiake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday, June 8, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter, it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southiake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southiake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake,Texas, 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-064 ,--- - `�=�' I am '(opposed to f�"in favor of(' undecided about)._ the request for/ the following reasons: - > , ,�/�` Lr<. y e e.i c ? .%�"L-5:e. '- . .� -?.F, k / r .- ) .di m' ?,:i t -%.C' A I''2.� ''( L.G ...�r''. " ter' `J' '•4" , ''''Z'Al/,'"'A° _7 -' - / ' /2.7e ) SIGNATURE. ..s p , , r`� C . . . . f,;, .' el .'.? � t. 19 ,, ' Please Print Name -a `� /-r r ADDRESS: 44 '/ . r`•, '' 7 %;'e/- = 44,e' ' .40 .7..11,o e 1 ? ,,,,--A,ct,_ ' -G t�fr-.:- s .4.' PHONE: t `' ," s/.,,,,'' Ellj J N Q e7 000 ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL AND CERTIFIED MALL*** Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-064 7G Page 3 L lly Vi 1Suu1.111aK , i cA 1S The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake,Texas, 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA I am (in favor of) pposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ` 3 (\if\ _ r �► ADDRESS: ZZ o j--� 6JA PHONE: 441WEEAO ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SE VIA REGULAR MAIL A Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-064 7G Page 4 The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake,Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake,Texas, 76092. REFERENCE .: ZA 00-064 I am (in favo of) (opposed to) (un ecided about) the request for the following reasons: hc—1 !� — h >1 c+2 o s e Ham- _ SIGNATURE: ( iu i (Please Print Name) ��1/7: 5 f7,h U //e ADDRESS: ‹.DC) o,J=)!1 S Lw _ A/Ak PHONE: 6/ 7 7/6, 9 ( J U N 0 5 200n ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL AND-CERTIFIED MAIL*** Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-064 7G Page 5 City of Southlake, Texas . iSTAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-060 PROJECT: Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus REQUEST: The Sabre Group is requesting approval of a revised site plan. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider site plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Tree Preservation Analysis (F) 11"x17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-060 7H ICity of Southlake, Texas • • BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: The Sabre Group PROPERTY SITUATION: This request is for the addition of a retention pond and associated improvements located north of Private Kirkwood Hollow Boulevard, west of White Chapel Road, east of T. W. King Road and situated within the Sabre Corporate Campus. The pond and proposed improvements are being incorporated within the open space/recreational areas, north of the first office building and garage structure being constructed on the site. A proposed trail encompasses the pond. The revised site plan is required to extend the area of construction beyond what was originally proposed in the first approved site plan. The applicant has provided detailed information about the purpose and development of the pond and associated improvements. HISTORY: Other recent activity on this property includes: • Zoning (ZA87-015) from Heavy Commercial to PUD for retail, office, commercial service uses approved in 1987 • Zoning/Concept Plan to NR-PUD (ZA95-074) & R-PUD (95-073) approved in 1995 • • Zoning/Development Plan (ZA97-74) • NR-PUD Zoning/Concept Plan (ZA99-056) approved on 7/20/99 • Preliminary Plat (ZA99-080) approved on 10/19/99 • Development Plan (ZA99-090) approved on 1/18/00 • Site Plan, Lot 1, Block 1 (ZA99-091) approved on 1/18/00 • Final Plat (ZA99-96) approved on 11//18/99 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus, on property legally described as portions of Tracts 2A2 and 2A7 situated in the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, and being approximately 25.6 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential and 100-Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2" Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti- port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-060 7H Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas NOTICES: Three (3) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments - Within 200 Notification Area _ Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 30, 2000, at their regular meeting on July 6, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 30, 2000. If approved, staff recommends this revised site plan be subject to the conditions of the previously approved plans and development regulations. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-060SPnews.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-060 7H Page 2 Vicinity Map Lot 4, Block 1 , Sabre Campus 1 1 Hill III III ! III i ° . I j ii \----''''-----• ,---- 'il E :1 1 . i44:7,11 �/\a. oft ra ilk, ___F tip,EJ1 0.0, Aittli I:,,44s.. • .. 41,1 I1, 04/ ____ � E J _4. � ' ill !-- L,.... _ _ _�; ,A Iputpip'!', ' r errnrrI_r • rI I. I 71 2000 0 2000 Feet immmiimmimmimil \ / W / � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-060 7H Page 1 Nn I. a, — " j • �m>� N z I.. — o . w ,p -� a.�� ,% \� o al IiN4 cn U III j t`\ `• \ --�� j ! THIS SUBMITTAL �� I ?- 4_ - i,. ,....., II I \\ \\,!...,,, \ ';6. 1 f\*.:;":::-''.'.'N:be CI,.a ae,„„ . ,.. 410%C.- BLOCK 1 \ ` � `> . ,`� �pCi�? _e I I LOT 1 \ !.`� . 1�14 -_ I 109.6470 Ac \s`: / 7 AND` q e I'I,1 ',nn„•.,,,,,,,, M1� s�. � N 1 '\ \� 4 FILL AREA/ • i s , I I «. fcnEETEwA `\ \, \�� ` `-� �i.,/T.* z 1 i� I kilit . . ars frp $ ss , ` ,,,,,AS is % ` calPE " nc IOW Or E 1 muS s d. ,°,................ .. _.. v BUIl.O,,,, �o ,: 1 �, \ .\ %j1!7 `\ORDWANCCS I 1 „A, 57 6 ' o'' ` 1 Iuomc nN 2 \ HI< , , .. 1,... 1 , i ,^m c.c+I•" ` �iNrtur t� ' I I I OJT r MU PAEAN/�Exnm POMD �� ! I I F 4 I I I I i .0 es c 63 �.._.._ _— _. " .� -� 40Ew I r .. I I 1 xxwnu..oa .vam Cr 632 n.._. C{IETE L- �� .. ...r I --- J .awt(Su.W illi ill —_-----. .. ligaill 1 , , , 1 I I SIX wu 9...I...nuaT naAt % , ' / , / I wo A ACM=WA t CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA CNIR1L PARKING 9a S.f�RE T E // // / `i / %% j l I 3 ENGINEER'S I 6 rr5. a (FOR STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) PL Z S.F• 567.2 MUST!CBI / ",'� I I I I !a GONEf1: AC +;Auto. ♦.� "jii. ,muCNRES gyp.B _ / / I O N LUC L..CI.E. -h. t 7-1 '0 ... F E NEG FA F OS �p&-w //ice /•. / //// II 1 0,,M THIS REVISED PLAN IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS r ' i' _ PL S PER�t�E `'S Ki • ''/- / / / II I DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.OUSLY PLANS AND �'�'� i ;', 1 s TR ,TH / j I In '?(i•. xEAPTy[T FAGA i / I pEA�C0Cn �.' „r, / � SABRE CORPORATE CAMPUS, 00 t �-' '- �7 �' � PHASE t`E;E�•� wo, �� i PART OF PROPOSED LOT 4 BLOCK 1 a _.._..___ pRK TJA . - / /� / �I 2560 acres _ �' � �i I n the �� /� i ID1 -_�__�,y— g= �' - _.- I U.P.MARTIN SURVEY IYINY J Y.o... 2-- ---- 200 I SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT CO., S I[ ,rr -. r /' - n/ i ! MAY,moo SITE PLAN C "� BLOCK 1 V PURPOSE OF SITEPLAN ., ;O° °�°rti 0" � [[ fD BLOCK 1 LOT 4 1. CUT AND FILL ARE "'n" " r'�'—C"'O1 rim'"" I- .7 LOT 2 25.6087 Ac 2. RETENTION POND '""°:°Mrrr I'—'• is mw.r MI a:- ,••� 113918 A[. C.c.e A,.zP sv-aeo. m•,.r•-' S 0_I r 1— ,.,, w....«,«.t.�.«,-«..,. • Sabre Corporate Campus Retention Structure/Irrigation Reservoir Phase 1 Sabre proposes construction of an approximately 2.5 acre stormwater retention structure on Lot 4 to collect stormwater runoff from 18.5 acres of the Phase 1 portions of Lots 1 and 2. The retention structure will serve three purposes: 1. Reduce the rate and quantity of stormwater runoff from developed areas. 2. Filter pollutants from the collected stormwater. 3. Recycle stormwater for use in irrigating the landscaped portions of the Phase 1 site. Sabre is committed to environmentally sensitive design, construction and operations for its campus. This includes responsibly managing the increase in stormwater runoff that is generated due to development of the site. The goal is to reasonably ensure that the volume, timing and rate of flows are controlled such that post-development runoff is equal to or less than pre- development runoff Sabre recognizes that proper management of stormwater runoff will reduce the effects of its development on land and stream channel erosion, reduce local flooding, and assist in the attainment and maintenance of water quality standards. Sabre is also committed to utilizing a variety of water conservation measures including high efficiency irrigation systems and controls. By using captured stormwater runoff for irrigation purposes, Sabre will reduce potable water consumption for irrigation and correspondingly reduce the burden on the city's municipal water supply. Initial Design Stormwater Flow and Water Quality. It is estimated that, in post-development conditions, one inch of rainfall in one hour on the Phase 1 site will result in 500,000 gallons of stormwater runoff. Under Sabre's initial design, all of this stormwater would flow through a 54-inch storm sewer pipe directly into Kirkwood Branch. The half million gallons are at least three times pre- development levels. Sabre's initial design was not required to specifically address deposits washed from impervious surfaces. Everyday activities will result in deposits— including sediments, oil/gas/grease, and trash—on impervious surfaces that are washed into the water system by rainfall. Under the initial design, these deposits could flow with the stormwater into Kirkwood Branch. Neither was Sabre's initial design required to specifically address water quality issues. The Environmental Protection Agency ranks urban runoff and storm-sewer discharges as the second most prevalent source of water quality impairment in the nation's estuaries and the fourth most prevalent source of impairment in lakes. Potential downstream impacts can include increased flooding, stream channel degradation, habitat loss, changes in water temperature, contamination of water resources, and increased erosion and sedimentation. RECTI )0'1 0 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZAS`( 16' orate Campus,June 2000 7 N Page 1 Page 2 Irrigation. Phase 1 landscaping will require approximately 90,000 gallons of water per week for irrigation. Under Sabre's initial plan, the city's municipal water supply would be used for irrigation. Revised Design In late 1999, Sabre made the commitment to pursue the US Green Building Council's LEED certification for its campus. LEED, an acronym for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a comprehensive rating system that provides direction and definition for sustainable design and construction. The LEED program was developed over a five-year period, with guidelines finalized and formally issued during Spring 2000. Sabre's commitment required reevaluation of all aspects of the campus design in light of several environmental goals, two of which are sustaining the site and safeguarding water. The LEED program recommends implementation of a stormwater management plan that minimizes stormwater runoff, increases on-site filtration and reduces contaminants. The program also recommends limiting or eliminating the use of potable water for landscape irrigation. While reviewing the LEED criteria against the initial design, Sabre decided to evaluate alternatives to address water quality and conservation issues. The environmentally preferred solution was a combination retention pond and irrigation reservoir— a structure that would retain stormwater on the site, filter out contaminants, and reuse the water to irrigate the landscaping on the site. Retention structures like the one being proposed are a recognized Best Management Practice for reducing flow rates and pollutant concentrations in urban runoff The revised design will add approximately $125,000 to the cost of the campus project. Location Considerations. Natural drainage patterns dictate that the retention structure be located at the low point in the watershed. On Sabre's site, such a low point is Lot 4. The specific location within Lot 4 was dictated by Kirkwood Boulevard on the south, power lines and the 50 foot natural easement to the north, and the overflow easement to the west. This location allows for overflows to discharge to Kirkwood Branch. Structure Design. The LEED program provided the design guidelines for the retention pond/irrigation reservoir. LEED: No net increase in the rate or quantity of stormwater runoff from existing to developed conditions. At the watershed elevation of 583 feet, the structure has a surface area of 50,000 square feet and a maximum depth of 17 feet. Maximum capacity of the structure is 3.15 million gallons of water, enough to contain runoff from six events of a one-inch rainfall in one hour. When heavy rainfall occurs and the resulting stormwater flow fills the reservoir, any overflow will go to Kirkwood Branch. The structure will still slow the timing and rate of flow. A channel lined with two layers of large stones will provide the path for the water to drain to the creek. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C zA cn*rate Campus,June 2000 711 Page 2 Page LEED: Treatment system must be designed to remove 80% of the average annual post development total suspended solids (TSS) and 90% of the average annual post development total phosphorous (TP). The retention structure will improve water quality simply by holding water long enough to allow sediment and other contaminants to settle out before the water is used or evaporates. Plants will be used as an additional filter medium, absorbing certain nutrients and metals. Photosynthesis and other naturally occurring chemical processes will remove or decompose various compounds. In addition, Sabre will take measures to reduce the amount of contaminants that enter the stormwater flow in the first place (e.g., oil and grit separators). Further, Sabre is investigating the use of organic fertilizers and pesticides in the landscaped portions of the site. Occasional maintenance will be required to remove the accumulated pollutants that settle in the retention structure. Sabre anticipates that this maintenance will occur at least annually, probably in the late summer when water levels in the reservoir are expected to be at their lowest. LEED: Use captured rain or recycled site water to reduce potable water consumption for irrigation by 50% over conventional means. Taking into account the irrigation demand level and normal evaporation, a full reservoir will accommodate 25-30 weeks of irrigation requirements. Sabre will use an estimated 90,000 gallons per week for irrigation purposes, and during the heat of the summer, up to another 55,000 gallons per week may be lost to evaporation. The reservoir's design includes provisions for a small structure to house the pumping equipment plus pad mounted transformers to facilitate irrigation. The pump housing structure will be below grade. Water service will be provided to the pumping station so that, in the event there is insufficient water in the reservoir for irrigation purposes, municipal water can be used. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C zAailo4fisoarate Campus,June 2000 7N Page 3 Page '� • City of Southlake, Texas Page 1 of 2 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-060 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 06/30/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Corporate Campus APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Sabre Group Brockette-Davis-Drake, Inc. Phone: 817-963-9757 Phone: 214-824-3647 Fax: 817-967-4914 Attn: Kay Alig Fax: 214-824-2586 Attn: Jim Riley CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/31/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. Residential Adjacency N Building Articulation N Masonry Standards Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. Impervious Coverage Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. Bufferyards Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. Interior Landscape Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. Driveways None Lighting Subject to the Approved Site Plan and adopted regulations. This Revised Site Plan encompasses a portion of Lot 4,within the previously approved Site Plan for Lots 1 - 4,Block 1, Sabre Corporate Campus (Case No. ZA99-091). Included in this revision is the addition of a detention pond, north of Private Kirkwood Boulevard, and an enlarged area for Phase I Construction encompassing the pond. This review focuses on the immediate area of the detention pond and the few associated improvements. Due to the limited scope of this revision, all charts and tables of the previous Site and Development Plans should be consulted. 1. Staff recommends the following caveat be made a condition of this Revised Site Plan: "This Revised Plan is subject to the conditions of the previously approved plans and development regulations." P&Z Action: July 7, 2000, Approved(7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 30, 2000. NOTE: The bufferyards and interior landscaping are as approved on the previous Site and Development Plans. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-060 7H Page 1 • City of Southlake, Texas Page 2 of 2 * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA00- 060" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-060SP2.DOC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-060 7H Page 2 TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-060 Date of Review: 5 — 11 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 4, Block 1, Sabre Corporate Campus (Site Plan) OWNER: PREPARED BY: The Sabre Group Brockette Davis Drake, Inc. 4255 Amon Carter 4144 N. Central Expressway, suite 1100 Fort Worth, TX 76115 Dallas, TX 75204 Phone: Phone: (214) 824-3647 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant submitted the required Tree Survey with the Site Plan. There are so many trees located within the area of the proposed retention pond that it is impossible to determine how many trees will be removed for the construction of the retention pond. 2. I surveyed the pond area to try and determine the actual density of trees that are 6" DBH and greater. After taking 10 density samples from the area it was determined that the average DBH is 7". The estimated total amount of trees 6" DBH and greater in the pond area is 370. The total diameter inches is 2,590". Although this is not an actual count of existing trees 6" DBH and greater, the technique for determining density of a species or amounts of trees within a stand is a standard forestry practice. 3. To date the applicant and the General Contractor have provided good faith in providing for and preserving as many trees as possible within the proposed construction areas. According to the applicant, the purpose of the retention pond is to collect site water drainage and reuse it as irrigation on the site. This has several positive environmental benefits, being that it: 1.) Reduces the amount of public water being used to maintain the landscape; 2.) It decreases the amount of pollutants that run off the site and into the Kirkwood Branch, sewer and water supply; 3.) Creates a local water source and habitat for local and migrating wildlife and 4.) Can be replanted with vegetation that provides a better food source that attracts and sustains wildlife in the area. The applicant has also identified the area to yield a significant amount of high-grade soil that will be used for the base of the building pads, parking lots and fire lanes. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA 00-060 7!' Page 1 4. After several meetings with the applicant, it is my understanding that the applicant plans to fully delineate the limits of the pond by a private drainage easement that will be filed by record of separate instrument prior to issuance of a permit. This easement then meets the definition of a buildable area as defined in their PUD regulations which exempts the improvement from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA 00-060 7 H Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas 4 MEMORANDUM • July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext. 757) SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 646-B, 2"d Reading, amending Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and the length of terms Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 646-B, 2"d Reading, amending Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and the Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and the length of terms. Background Information: Ordinance No. 646 and Section 12-77 of the City of Southlake City Code states the following: "The board shall consist of nine citizens of the city, and who shall be appointed by the city council for three-year terms. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the board shall be numbered one through nine." iWith the most recent appointments in June, there are now seven (7) active board members, which is consistent with the other City Boards. The proposed ordinance reduces the terms of new appointments on or after June 1, 2000 to two (2) years. With the recent appointments, there are now three (3) places expiring in 2001, and four(4) places expiring in 2002. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable. Citizen Input/ Board Review: City Council approved this ordinance on first reading (7-0) at its June 20, 2000 meeting with no changes. Legal Review: Not Applicable. Alternatives: Alternatives include the following: • Revisions to Ordinance No. 646 and the Southlake City Code,Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77, "Park and Recreation Board" as desired. . Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Exhibit A, copy of Ordinance No. 646-B with changes shown as highlighted, strikeout. rl��"_ ( i) Billy Campbell, City Manager July 14, 2000 Page 2 • • Exhibit B, copyof strikethrough version of Southlake CityCode Section g 12-77, "Number of board members, qualifications, and terms." This exhibit highlights the proposed revisions to the City Code. Staff Recommendation: Place as an item on the June 20, 2000 City Council agenda to consider City Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, revising Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and the Southlake City Code, Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77, revising the number of members and length of terms. KH • • • (2-) I, EXHIBIT A 00 ORDINANCE NO. 646-B AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 646, "PARK AND RECREATION BOARD," AND SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE, SECTION 12-77, REVISING THE NUMBER OF PARK BOARD MEMBERS AND THE LENGTH OF TERMS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of park improvements and recreation programs; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Youth Parks and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the Park and Recreation Board relating to recreation programs and park improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to prohibit certain types O. of conduct within city parks; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. Creation of the Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Board." Section 2. Number of Board Members, Qualifications and Terms. The Board shall consist of nine (9) citizen& i10110.1**1 of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for three (3) year term& two )y iTtAi 3 / c ( 0. Members shall serve until their successors s wr��a�i��ipo�tinen�s�u*� �a�i"a �- ` `� are appointed, without compensation. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through nine (9)seven;(7) The city council in making the appointments to the Board, shall give due consideration to the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Park and Recreation Board. The City Council if it deems it desirable, may appoint ex officio members to the board. In addition, the chairperson of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall . serve as an ex officio member of the board. Such ex officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of office of such ex officio members shall begin on January 1st of each leyear and end on December 31st of that year. Such ex officio members shall have no voting IT 1�") allauthority for park and recreation matters. Vacancies on the board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. Section 3. Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held on the second Monday of each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the City Secretary or the Chairman of the Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Board shall be reported to the City Council which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 4. Board Duties and Responsibilities. The duties and responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Board shall be to: 00 a. Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation including development of long range capital improvements programs. b. Cooperate with other City boards and commissions, other governmental agencies, civic groups, and all citizens of the city in the advancement of sound park and recreation planning and programming. c. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. d. Recommend programs for development of recreational areas, facilities and improved recreation services. e. Recommend the adoption of standards for recreational areas, facilities and their financial support. f. Review an annual report of existing park and recreation programs and services. g. Review the annual budget of the park and recreation programs prior to submission to the City Council and submit a recommendation on the budget. Section 5. Creation of a Youth Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Youth Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Youth Board." Section 6. Number, Qualifications and Terms. a. The Youth Board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who must be students enrolled in school in grades seven through twelve. The Park SO and Recreation Board shall appoint members for two (2) year terms. The Board shall appoint the members using the following procedure: N:I Parks & Recreation I BOARDSI CCI2000I Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc2 nrrltt) 41/0 (1),Interested persons meeting the qualifications shall submit an application to the Director of Parks and Recreation. (2).An interview committee, comprised of four members, one Park and Recreation Board member, one member of City staff, as appointed by the Park and Recreation Director, one Board member of the Southlake Park Development Corporation, and one member of the Youth Park Board, shall review the applications and conduct interviews if appropriate. (3).The committee shall make recommendations for members to the Park and Recreation Board, ensuring an even distribution among the age of the applicants. b. The Board shall appoint members who shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. c. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through seven (7). Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner provided for regular appointments. In making the initial appointments, the Parks and Recreation Board shall appoint four (4) members of the Youth Board for two-year terms and three members for one-year terms. Section 7. Youth Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Youth Board, shall meet in the 00 first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Youth Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held once each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the Director of Park and Recreation or the Chairman of the Youth Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Youth Board shall be reported to the Park and Recreation Board which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Youth Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 8. Duties of the Youth Park and Recreation Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall be to: a. Act in an advisory capacity to the Park and Recreation Board in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation, including development of long range capital improvement 00 programs. b. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. N:I Parks & Recreation I BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc3 IT' fcl 41411 c. Recommend youth-related programs for development of recreational facilities, areas and improved recreation services. d. Prepare and submit to the Park and Recreation Board an annual review of youth- related parks and recreation programs and services. Section 9. Definitions. a. Alcoholic Beverage shall be defined to include any alcohol and any beverage containing more than one-half (1/2) of one percent of alcohol by volume which is capable of use for beverage, either alone or when diluted. b. City park shall be defined to be any park, playground or recreational area owned, leased, operated or under the control of the City of Southlake. This definition shall include any athletic field, swimming pool, gymnasium, tennis court, and other similar facility owned by the Carroll Independent School District and specified in the joint- use agreement between Carroll Independent School District and the City of Southlake. Section 10. Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or consume any alcoholic beverage in any city park. Section 11. Riding or Driving Horses in City Park. Except on designated horse trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride a horse or horses within any city park. 41. Section 12. Riding or Driving Off-Road Vehicles in City Park. Except on designated off-road trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride an off-road vehicle within any city park. For the purposes of this section, an off-road vehicle is a vehicle designed and equipped for use of any paved roadway with such definition to specifically include off-road motor bikes, go-carts, and dune buggies. Section 13. Vehicular.Traffic Prohibited in Certain Areas. Except in designated overflow parking areas, it shall be unlawful for any motor vehicle to stand, stop, park or cross onto or into any portion of a city park other than upon a roadway or parking area so designated for such purposes. Section 14. Time limitations on Public Use of Park. Except for a city sponsored event, it shall be unlawful for any person to use, enter into or be within a city park during any posted hours which the park is closed. Section 15. Littering. Littering is hereby prohibited in any city park. Littering shall include leaving trash or other items by persons picnicking within a city park and not placing trash and other items in appropriate trash receptacles provided in such park. Section 16. Firearms Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry on or about himself or to discharge a gun, pistol, rifle, or other firearm within any city park except that soa person duly licensed by the State of Texas to carry a concealed handgun may carry a concealed handgun in accordance with State Law. N:I Parks & Recreation I BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc4 • 00 Section 17. Rollerblading prohibited except in designated areas. It shall be unlawful for any person to use rollerblades on tennis courts and other posted areas in any city park. Section 18. Hitting Golf Balls Prohibited. Except in designated areas, it shall be unlawful for any person to hit golf balls in city parks. Section 19. Smoking Prohibited Except in Designated Areas. It shall be unlawful to smoke in bleachers, dugouts, or other congested outdoor areas at city parks. Section 20. Bicycling Prohibited in Certain Areas. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle on other than an improved vehicular road or path designated for that purpose. A bicyclist shall be permitted to wheel or push a bicycle by hand over any grassy areas or wooded trail or on any paved area reserved for pedestrian use only. Section 21. Glass Containers Prohibited in City Park. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a glass container in a city park. Section 22. Variances. The City Manager may issue special permits or grant variances to the provisions of this ordinance. The Southlake Park and Recreation Board will make recommendations regarding variances to the City Manager. A special permit variance shall not be granted by the City Manager unless a written request is submitted which demonstrates: 410 a. Special circumstances exist which are peculiar to the applicant's ability to utilize city parks; and b. That use of the city park by other groups or individuals will not be adversely affected by granting the special permit variance. Section 23. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 515 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 24. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Section 25. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects, or . refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 6 N:I Parks & Recreation I BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc5 ISOSection 26. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 515 or any other ordinances affecting city parks which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 27. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 28. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and is so ordained. . PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. ISMAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 41. N:I Parks & Recreation 1 BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3llOrdNo.646-B.doc6 ( rrE $ ) . EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney S. S. N:I Parks & Recreation I BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc7 � T ( ' ) EXHIBIT B ISProposed Revisions to the Southlake City Code, Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77 Sec. 12-77. Number of board members, qualifications, and terms. The board shall consist of Ring trf citizens of the city, and who shall be appointed by the city council for t two-year terms, ecv �arirat� a �{n 7, Ot10:. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the board shall be numbered one through e S ion. S I N:IParks&RecreationIBOARDSICC120001Qtr31OrdNo646-B codechg.doc City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 787, 2"d Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition Action Requested: Abandon a permanent utility easement along SH 114 on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition Background Information: Several easements were required to install sanitary sewer and water improvements along the south side of SH 114 from N. Kimball to Gateway Plaza, Phase 1. The sewer and water improvements were required to relocate existing facilities that were in conflict with the SH 114 reconstruction. The water and sewer improvements have been constructed. The water and sewer improvements crossed the tracts of properties that make-up Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 (see project map). Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 has been rezoned and platted. The land Title Company handling the closing of the tracts of property discovered that the wrong property owner had inadvertently signed one of the easements. However, the easement was recorded with Tarrant County. In order to clear the title to the land, the easement must be abandoned. The rightful property owner is in the process of executing the required easement. Financial Considerations: None. Citizen Input / Board Review: None. Legal Review: The easement is considered null and invalid since the rightful property owner did not grant it. The attorneys have recommended Council formally abandon the easement. This will create a clear title. Alternatives: None. 7J-1 City of Southlake, Texas Supporting Documents: Project map Ordinance No. 787 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council abandon a utility easement along SH 114 on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. Please place this item on the July 18, 2000 City Council Agenda for approval. SP/sep 7J-2 N-5 UTILITY EASEMENT PROJECT MAP 51 N1 _—T_--g GREY h —01 , GpUNTR _ I NG„s , ‘ a _ Easement to l. — be Abandoned Water & Sewer NORTHWEST PKWY EAST I Improvements Rp,R —---ram - --- • _ - R P g D`��GN ,��p\ OVI\ '---------,------,_______________ � p a PD 1111 F ' Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 111 ¢N ;US•PP P\i�� �� G�G? '� imin ,A0 . ... 1 P tt I 7J-3 ORDINANCE NO. 787 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING AN EASEMENT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND CONTROL OF THIS EASEMENT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that an easement, located in the City of Southlake, is not being used by, nor is useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said easement, the city desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said easement to the owner of the abutting property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 An easement more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc (06/20/00) PAGE 4 7J-4 and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. Accordingly, the above described easement is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and shall revert in fee simple to the owner of the abutting property. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake. Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed to , releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the easement, on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3 A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the city council that the phrases, clauses. sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc (06/20/00) PAGE 5 7J-5 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc (06/20/00) PAGE 6 7J-6 EXHIBIT "A" PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1 POB STATE HWY 114 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT CONCRETE MONUMENT 10. 018 sq ft. 0. 230 acres N50.01 '?1 "E N06.59'2,3"E , r 4.06 /''- --- 10.03 135.00 T-_ 587.27'48"E 148.18' N86.09' 1h,,E, ,T, ^k'S, 500.11 'S4'"W S82•25 23 _ -- 86 1 „•� } .77' S87.27'48"E 104 70' ",� " 7'4" "4'b { a � L/+ 25.06' i " /�`tS h "y�1 -4. ,k i L --) .w$,7r Gt�'r - {,,, *"1 "� fw`' Xr I ."� 3 g ,;;i N00•1 4 1p E " .. - .. s • 'lr..`3a r 9r s. „ `,r�* );, �.Y „r, N= . 12.09 I 2•2.5 .1,.:_ .....,4 :y1:.c:a;r..,... :.tx�"E1rr� "s ,, m "53ui.1 �' ��_ .` ... ....,k .s a..r.....: .... �:�.;' , 88.6523 W N87.27'48"W 255.67' 586'09' 17 W TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT — i �qS�er ' Qa KIMBALL / 1709 ADDITON S r CAB.A,SLIDE 4552 q�I S P- 25 LOT 5,BLOCK 1 S \ t I 1\ . I �� OF T Note'ALL fiEAR1YCS BASED ON STATE PLAAE COORDINATES FROM/ TIC TEXAS D.O.T. ' 4%.TER F+ y ��. * co v, SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I.Eddie L.Cheatham of CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES.o Registered Professional a 20 60 too EDDE L.CHEATHAM.. Land Surveyor of the State of Texas.do hereby declare that the calculations, I I 4 2346 graphic depiction and legal description. of this .trvey were property prepared !,I ai 2:t o+O. under my personal supervision from an actual survey made on the ground. ( PI FEET ) ~' SUR4 { 1 Inch - 50 ft. CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES L.!—1,--c�D SOIL LAf1AR BLVD SUITE 200 Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.2346 ARLIiGTON TEXAS 700t1 tern 54e-oese wire tamxeb-ewe EXHIBIT'B' Permanent Utility Easement 35' Temporary Construction Easement • Being a 0.230 acre tract of land in the Samuel Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land, over, through, and across Lot 5 of the Kimball/1709 Addition,as shown on plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4552,(P.R.T.C.T.)and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a Texas D.O.T. concrete monument found in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114,said point being the northeast corner of said Lot 5; THENCE S 00° 11' 54"W,a distance of 25.06 feet to a point for a corner in the east property line of said Lot 5; THENCE S 86°09' 17"W,a distance of 134.63 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 87°27'48"W,a distance of 255.67 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 82° 25' 23" W, a distance of 88.65 feet to a point for a corner in the west property line of said Lot 5; THENCE N 00° 14' 15" E, a distance of 12.09 feet to a Texas D.O.T. concrete monument found for a corner in the west property line of Lot 5; THENCE N 50°01'21"E,a distance of 4.06 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE S 82°25'23"E,a distance of 86.77 feet to a point for a corner; • THENCE S 87°27'48"E,a distance of 104.70 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 06° 59' 23" E, a distance of 10.03 feet to a point for a corner in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE S 87° 27' 48" E, a distance of 148.18 feet to a point for a corner in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE N 86° 09' 17" E, a distance of 135.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing within these metes and bounds 0.230 acres or 10,018 square feet of land,more or less. G:W0l-4501450-LGL3-r.doc July 9,1999 7J-8 MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sharen Elam, Director of Finance Ext. 716 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 756-A, 2°d Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 756, amending FY 99-00 Annual Budget. Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 756-A to amend the FY1999-2000 Annual Budget. Background Information: Ordinance No. 756-A is presented to the Council to reflect the proposed mid year changes to the Adopted FY1999-2000 Budget. The amendments to the budget reflect a decrease in revenues and expenditures of $134,853 and $630,965, respectively. "Exhibit A" is an attachment to the ordinance, and includes a summary of the proposed revenue and expenditure revisions titled "Proposed Mid Year Budget Revisions FY1999-2000". Division 100, City Secretary reflects a proposed increase of $12,932 for additional cost associated for the recent election. Division 103, City Manager reflects a proposed increase of $6,496 due to additional SPIN mailings and personnel cost. Staff has also proposed an increase of $54,205 for Division 105, Support Services, for an additional technical service technician. The change does not increase total personnel adopted in the 1999-2000 budget. The council approved the new position; ROW agent in division 146 for fiscal year 1999-2000, as of May 31, 2000 the position was still vacant. Staff is recommending transferring the personnel cost approved for the ROW agent ($57,113) to support service to fund an additional technical service technician. Financial Considerations: The proposed amendment decreases budgeted revenues and expenditures. It is expected, as stated in the Mid-Year Review documents, that revenues will continue to come in at or slightly above budget estimates with the exception of the revenue accounts amended. It is anticipated that fund integrity will be maintained, as the expenditure adjustments reflect the general fund balance at 15.3%. This is within the adopted Fund Balance Policy, which states a minimum balance of 15% and an optimum balance of 25%. —1 V-1 Citizen Input/ Board Review: Public Hearing, 2°d reading scheduled for July 18, 2000 Legal Review: N/A Alternatives: The alternative is not to amend the budget and forgo the proposed revisions. Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. 756-A and Exhibit A. Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 756-A by the City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 756-A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,REVISING THE BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1999,AND TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT,PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 1999-2000 budget which was approved by City Council with Ordinance No. 756 on September 7, 1999, and submitted same to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, a copy of said amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS,the City Council has studied the Budget Amendment and has determined that the Budget Amendment attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the revised figures,prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 1999-2000 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3. That the Budget Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 1999, and ending September 30, 2000; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget. Section 4. That the City Manager has determined that there are revenues available for appropriation in excess of those estimated in the 1999-2000 approved budget. Section 5. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Ordinance No. 756-A page 2 Section 6. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this day of 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Ordinance No. 756-A page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: L:\FlNANCEIMIDYEAR\ORD(G5A.W PD/Iah 1K5 txninit A GENERAL FUND Proposed Mid Year Budget Revisions FY 1999-2000 Proposed $Increase! 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 (Decrease) % Increase/ REVENUES Actual Adopted Revisions Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $5,970,274 $6,562,798 $6,562,798 $0 0.0% Sales Tax 3,070,097 3,569,839 3,569,839 0 0.0% Franchise Fees 1,099,954 1,283,296 1,180,943 (102,353) -8.0% Fines 704,567 835,798 835,798 0 0.0% Charges for Services 707,912 657,132 624,632 (32,500) -4.9% Permits/Fees 2,116,103 1,937,565 1,937,565 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 238,075 182,954 182,954 0 0.0% Interest Income 237,437 190,000 190,000 0 0.0% Total Revenues $14,144,419 $15,219,382 $15,084,529 ($134,853) -0.9% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $253,911 $340,874 353,806 $12,932 3.8% Human Resources 226,467 266,105 260,434 (5,671) -2.1% City Manager 442,912 373,692 380,188 6,496 1.7% Support Services 2,188,545 2,682,100 2,736,30- 54,205 2.0% General Gov.Total $3,111,835 $3,662,771 $3,730,7:,.3 $67,962 1.9% Finance 425,712 511,040 491,988 (19,052) -3.7% Municipal Court 296,012 360,922 348,740 (12,182) -3.4% Teen Court 86,763 76,583 76,490 (93) -0.1% Finance Total $808,487 $948,545 $917,218 ($31,327) -3.3% Fire 1,891,944 1,910,137 1,836,137 (74,000) -3.9% Police 3,222,632 3,676,559 3,575,128 (101,431) -2.8% Public Safety Support 1,046,085 955,370 920,430 (34,940) -3.7% Building Inspections 682,373 894,361 847,619 (46,742) -5.2% Public Safety Total $6,843,034 $7,436,427 $7,179,314 ($257,113) -3.5% Streets/Drainage 770,495 1,074,789 985,303 (89,486) -8.3% Public Works Admin 865,353 937,633 785,446 (152,187) -16.2% Public Works Total $1,635,848 $2,012,422 $1,770,749 ($241,673) -12.0% Planning 472,893 627,429 545,420 (82,009) -13.1% Economic Development 149,805 254,005 233,815 (20,190) -7.9% Community Dev.Total $622,698 $881,434 $779,235 ($102,199) -11.6% Community Services 363,339 549,868 532,346 (17,522) -32% Parks and Recreation 1,280,977 1,745,508 1,714,013 (31,495) -1.8% Library Services 96,775 162,008 144,410 (17,598) -10.9% Community Svcs.Total $1,741,091 $2,457,384 $2,390,769 ($66,615) -2.7% Total Expenditures $14,762,993 $17,398,983 $16,768,018 ($630,965) -3.6% Net Revenues ($618,574) c$2 179 601.) L$1,683,489) $496,112 Proceeds from C.O.Sale/Lease $707,903 $0 $0 $0 Transfers In 939,200 785,527 785,527 0 Transfers Out ($272,408) ($133,697) ($133,697) 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) $1,374,695 $651,830 $651,830 Beginning Fund Balance $2,837,899 $3,594,021 $3,594,020 Reserved Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 Ending Fund Balance $3,594,020 $2,066,250 $2,562 361 Fund balance percentage-C/Y 24.34% 11.88% 15.28% City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM 7/14/00 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sean Leonard, Court Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. #784, Second Reading Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund Action Requested: Approval and Adoption of Ordinance No. #784. Background Information: During the 76`h Legislative session, Senate Bill #601 was passed amending article 102.0172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize the City of Southlake to create by ordinance a Municipal Court Technology Fund. A defendant convicted of a misdemeanor may be required to pay a fee not to exceed $4 as a municipal court cost. If a person receives probation or deferred adjudication, or if the court defers final disposition of the case, the defendant is considered convicted. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for the municipal court. These enhancements may include computer systems, computer networks, and computer hardware, imaging systems, electronic kiosks, electronic ticket writers and docket management systems. Please be aware that this article expires September 1, 2005. Financial Considerations: Based on the current trend of citation issuance, it is estimated that the collection of this fund could result in the collection of $150,000.00 to $200,000.00 of revenues to the City of Southlake before this article expires in September 1, 2005. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any board review. Legal Review: The City Attorney Rob Allibon has reviewed the mandated state requirements and created the attached document. Alternatives: None Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. #784 L-1 Billy Campbell, City Manager July 14,2000 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Place Ordinance No. #784, on the 18th day of July, 2000 City Council agenda for consideration. N:\Court\Memorandums\TechFundMemo071300.doc ORDINANCE NO. 784 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF A MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FEE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and . WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to establish a Municipal Court Technology Fund pursuant to Article 102.0172 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. SECTION 1. A. ESTABLISHMENT OF MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND (1) There is hereby created and established a Municipal Court Technology Fund, hereinafter referred to as the "Fund," pursuant to Article 102.0172, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. (2) The Fund may be maintained in an interest-bearing account and may be maintained in the general revenue account. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION (1) The fee shall be in the amount of four dollars. (2) The fee shall be assessed and collected from the defendant upon conviction for a misdemeanor offense in the City of Southlake Municipal Court as a cost of court. A defendant is considered convicted if: • MunlClTechFund.doc(OB•25.99) Page 1 (a) a sentence is imposed on the person; (b) the person is placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision; or (c) the court defers final disposition of the person's case. (3) The fee shall be collected on conviction for an offense committed on or after September 1, 1999. (4) The Court Clerk shall collect the fee and pay the fee to the Finance Director of the City of Southlake, who shall deposit the fee into the Municipal Court Technology Fund. C. DESIGNATED USE OF THE FUND AND ADMINISTRATION (1) The Fund shall be used only to finance the purchase of t chnological enhancements for the Municipal Court of the City of Southlake, Texas, including: (a) computer systems; (b) computer networks; (c) computer hardware; (d) computer software; (e) imaging systems; (f) electronic kiosks; (g) electronic ticket writers; or (h) docket management systems. (2) The Fund shall be administered by or under the direction of the City Council of the City of Southlake. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, MuniCtTechFund.doc(08-25-99) Page 2 clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. SECTION 4. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 5. In accordance with Article 102.0172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this ordinance and the assessment and collection of the Municipal Court Technology fee expires September 1, 2005. The purpose of the use of any funds remaining in the Fund shall continue to be used and administered as required by this ordinance and for that purpose this ordinance remains in effect. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. MuniCtTechFund.doc(08-25-99) Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney MuniCtTechFund.doc(08-25-99) Page 4 V • City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM 7/13/00 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sean Leonard, Court Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. #785, Second Reading, Providing For an Increase in Warrant Fees Action Requested: Repeal Ordinance No. #366 relating to the fee for the issuance and service of a warrant of arrest and approval of Ordinance No. #785. Background Information: When a sworn complaint or affidavit based on probable cause has been filed before the municipal court, the judge may issue a warrant for the arrest and /or detention of the accused. During the 76th Texas legislative session, Senate Bill #163 was passed amending Article 102.011(a)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by increasing the fee for executing or processing an issued Warrant of Arrest or Capias Pro Fine warrant from $35.00 to $50.00. Financial Considerations: The approval and implementation of this fee could result in the collection of an estimated $15,000.00 to 45,000.00 per year in additional revenues to the City of Southlake. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any board review. Legal Review: Upon review of Ordinance No. #366, City Attorney Rob Allibon recommends that Ordinance No. #366 should be repealed so as to allow the City Manager in conjunction with the Municipal Court Clerk to administratively set and establish the amount of the warrant fee as established by law. He has reviewed and approved the attached document for City Council consideration. Alternatives: The City Council may approve the proposed ordinance as submitted or they may deny or recommend a different amount (not to exceed $50.00 per warrant) as they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. #785. 1M- • Billy Campbell, City Manager July 14, 2000 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Place Ordinance No. #785, on the 18th day of July, 2000 City Council Agenda for consideration. N:\Court\Memorandums\WarrantFeeMemo071300.doc � � � - ORDINANCE NO. 785 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 366 RELATING TO THE FEE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF A WARRANT OF ARREST; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake in Ordinance No. 366 established a fee not to exceed Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) for the issuance a d service of a warrant of arrest pursuant to the authority granted by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature may from time to time increase the fee for the issuance and service of a warrant of arrest; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to repeal Ordinance No. 366 to allow the City Manager in conjunction with the Municipal Court Clerk to administratively set and establish the amount of the warrant fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 366 of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the city of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such warrantordinance060900.dac(10/12/99)Pape 1 ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance, since the Name would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. warrantordinance060900.doc(10/12/99)Page 2 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney warrantordinance060900.doc(10112J99)Page 3 �1M - S City of Southlake, Texas S STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-052 PROJECT: Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition RESOLUTION: 00-075 REQUEST: On behalf of Dalton Oil, Inc., CMPA, Inc is requesting a Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station with a convenience store and a car wash. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Tree Preservation Analysis S (F) Developer Comment (G) Resolution No. 00-75 (H) 11"x 17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough(Ext. 787) S Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-052 7N City of Southlake, Texas • BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Dalton Oil, Inc. APPLICANT: CMPA, Inc PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at the northeast corner of S.H. 114 and N. Kimball Avenue. This is an existing Texaco Service Station. The purpose of this request is to add two fuel pumps and a car wash to the site and bring the the site into compliance with current regulations. The existing building is to remain "as is" with the exception of cosmetic exterior changes. HISTORY: This site has been in existence for several years. The following is a brief history: • Light industrial zoning was placed on the property in September 1971. • SUP for sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption in March 1979. • "C-3" retail commercial zoning placed on the property in September of 1989 •• • Preliminary plat approved in December of 1999.S . Final plat approved in March 2000. Plat approval included the common access easement on the adjacent property to the north. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1,Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District NOTICES: Seven (7) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, to delete Item#1 (8' screening device); to show a pass through lane with a possible variance for that request; and to include the Tree Preservation Analysis. •AFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated July 12, 2000. The Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-052 7N Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas • following variances are requested: • 8' screening device along the north property line. • 25' Type "J" Landscape Buffer along the southern property line. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-052SUP.doc • • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-052 7N Page 2 • Vicinity Map Lot 1 , Block 1 Emery Addition T u I D Fii A tj I HIG • DTI .. - - SIIF I - ' I - - C .� l - Jvidokhd \r- _ ilii ..ewomiht, -,....--mara •- girmr.in tr,___,_ftli rm. —irs im. _ mi. —it iilL irjj .n_mo `IF II I-am,mo ri S�■^ am' rtalumatv.h.viiii, IVY ,ii-X 1 - '1 1. IV.im r Ti mm lift *`""Imi i p"4 ',14 E. E. _ 'LL' /-" 11,4 fi- � ar 111r. _ " -C3 ► L. L il $ : . _ ii):_E .4._EST .. •� II �,...,.. di �ow 91 AB time �11 _ r vilrrins icEiM y "r i� 31:MI own■ ����� 2000 0 2000 Feet N (........._W /rE 0 Case No. Agenda Item Arrachment B ZA 00-052 7N Page 1 Nn • • • oy es OA Q/ I� V\ • .w+».1Y!MAW-0.1"1•p1YA•1D. . 1 I��~ GENERAL NOTE: LANDSCAPE LEGEND: 1,,,,,, : II I.DRAMAS!Or OIT!tl MOT TO OE KTOPa ��J�/�J��� �'^� �^� ].TO!.•M EMMY*MISS Ow TM.env S. % % X norm YA1�! -.-.-.-._ / . . II ~• 9..010I MUTTS Mee TO R rennOt.-eD �•• rwwoo • • •• woe aM.w.�/ II r ►AA•CIMY .•.1. R op ToT. TNT Fflol.Tea Twos 11 I T. ..• -\ I _ I-IMIOUOR wO.LA..1. •w' I.wc� „ woe - U _ e ( / LOT'J '�' nw.00 M• a-e II R FPO dNOM err f C worm.. r...... ...ma A..ellenART T noel a.1 Awx a woo ..... Kt r•ovsno MITT r=17 Taff TR T. • N1Mpla •fC .►w.M1•Tn. • 9 . WV. MV. Q o _�� I --► rae.0 �I/""I 1. _ '-, LOT 2 .. ..... ..r. a- $ it dMIR -- ,rE' m w a.... .e..._....AM.«.r.r_._w..Mwa 2 i II V 3 ~ wfF r1.r 1I Y i PAT.A'aM1ART TOTAL 11QMIOC9 z 3 r� iiii �. FiS►X I T ►$ I �q� V �:�I1•010160 WWI OM Mt ORSOITIVON Hi .. ...,. •M._. `1.,• I 'r`A"'•rrs'OW* •earn•T. b LOT s 7;y� II.a ='® I I �1.. ar. GA an Zy w ego A: .. �:A�/���e ` �1I Texaco ei srsr�now 1 ;I i .� A.A� WOW. r�.er. •ore.w..r+» W T...1 • }.; :.J i / . I E I ; , sue•••. wsw..w1., Ti' / 9...WR....i.FTIP.... 014.0.01 MITT MTV 31-0.........4.., , , k iv-, I; MOP TTOOK MOOT Oa OF. i I r ,,,k ,,:/// 177,killitifiritil ••• ,� '1��1���\\\ �--,...,......I.�T /� W CPwrYCT MMwA/w W.M w��1► w/Ar tPwRn.rbMYr[M w i I. • o •.� MOTOR MOT z �. a fir:. V :.1�: �i�iiii���i�������������a�:;�i��oi I , a. .A.:.OTT.WORMYw:.a.:p:TO TOW RET. F' �n "ram I�+' •••� . A�.��A��i.���• �' ..,.. ON,. . o I �•�� ����^+A•�w�:rii+� ����.�y� .� .......... LEGAL DESCRIPTION a ADDRESS: OTTO a:TT IWO x 6 ,l � '�i► .�,:,.. ar 11�►�` over aovl.,or+ 1:.e:...A. .. z a �I/if �, LOT r ��, _- I AN ADDITION TO • _--• U j T1E MI Q TRACT OF TARRANi OED IN TEX/V, •..°� J 6 BER16 R FREEMAN Q LAND S1STRA D IN T1! 'v::e,IBM a x '�-- .� �.....�.. sarlJEL fl7EEMHN SURVEY,ABSTRACT X No.535, W a..,.o. L Q V► j -w `_ j ralwaNr caI Nx,STATE OF Tews. ...»..... S (� F �STA�=NO. 114 -���� 1 -� Iirii7_: Q -r-4-1.. _.�.�_ j "�"•I 411 NORTH KIMBALL AVE. • SITE PLAN T L� I T " SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS "I604I2 - MOW SOU • SITE PLAN Susie As Seen Of r.w Rip Rio VICINITY MAP SCALE r.20-0• ,,,.,p1 ° — - ` - - -'- - - - - - - CITY CASE NO. ZAOJIL 112000 '"" AI et b co LU = City of Southlake, Texas • SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-052 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 07/12/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Texaco, Lot 1, Emery Addition APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Dalton Oil CMPA, Inc. 323 W. Northwest Hwy 1450 Hughes Rd, Suite 100 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: 817-488-7107 Phone: 817-410-5163 Fax: 817-488-5396 Attn: Mike Dalton Fax: 817-410-5171 Attn: Billy Williams CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/11/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT MARK JOHNSON AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y idential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 1 ilding Articulation N Site improvements do not affect existing building Masonry Standards N Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No.2 Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y Shown as Platted Lighting Y 1. A screening device is required along any property line adjacent to a parcel with an occupied residential dwelling. An 8' screening device is required along the north property line. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 7/6/00:Allow as shown) 2. A 25' Type "J" Bufferyard is required along the southern property line where a 17' Type "J" Bufferyard is shown. (Variance Requested) (P&Z recommendation, 7/6/00:Allow reduction in bufferyard to provide for pass through lane) S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-052 7N Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas Action: Approve 7-0 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000 with the variances noted above and including the Tree Preservation Analysis and the following comment: • Commissioner Muller also recommended that the City look at posting "No Parking" signs for trucks. * The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 75% for the "C-3" Zoning District. * The carwash will be subject to the noise level regulations of Section 43.13. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may • include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: J. Craig Dalton, Dalton Oil VIA FAX: ABOVE Billy Williams, CMPA, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-052SP4.DOC S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-052 7N Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas • TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00- 051 Date of Review: 6—08 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Lot 1, Emery Addition (Site Plan)Resubmittal Review #2 OWNER: PREPARED BY: Dalton Oil Co. CMPA, Inc 525 W. Northwest Hwy. 1450 Hughs Rd. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: (817) 329-6600 Phone: (817) 329-6600 Fax: (817) 410-5164 Fax: (817) 410-5164 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. VE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. There are no existing protected trees on the Texaco site but the Emery lot North of the Texaco is heavily wooded. The proposed access drive on the North side of the Texaco, cutting through the Emery lot and connecting to North Kimball Ave, is placed through a stand of existing Post Oaks and Cedar Elms. The submitted Tree Survey shows approximately 18 trees to be removed for the placement and construction of the access drive. Four (4) of the trees are within the R.O.W. of North Kimball. The stand of trees is even aged and the approximate average DBH is 10", with many of the trees being multi-trunked. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety S of this lot. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-051 7N Page 1 • FROM EMERY FAX NO. : 9406482775 May. 23 2000 07:2 PMP2 05/23i'00 )3:06 FAX617 OS 5395 fl.,1LTO' OIL INC May 22,2000 City of Sout lake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southtakey Texas 76092 Re: Barrier Wall To Whom It May Concern: Being the property owner adjacent to Circle E Texaco located on the corner of 401 North Kimball and Highway 114 in Southlake,Texas;prefer not to have a privacy wall constructed. Sincerely, • ageAr- Doug,Emery • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA 00-052 ;N Page 1 Resolution No. 00-75 Oage 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EMERY ADDITION,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 5712, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.918 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A",AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,a Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station with a convenience store 111 and car wash has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (40) and 45.10 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise,and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ah OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: • SECTION 1. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-052 7N Page 1 Resolution No. 00-75 Page 2 A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a gasoline service station with a convenience store and car wash on the property being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 1111 4. 5. Any other conditions of this Specific Use Permit as stated in the motion made by the City Council at the regular meeting on July 18, 2000, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-052 7N Page 2 Resolution No. 00-75 •Pae 3 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1999. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: • City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-052 7N Page 3 Resolution No. 00-75 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,being approximately 0.918 acres S S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-052 7N Page 4 � �' • • o r • o Z `d xi C N CD I vT O �� I\Y\ GENERAL NOTE: y/y 1 CA,pE LEGENLI 10.10 - 0 �.. ,n.n.Trr TT.rn.o.nos n.c S� w.+s.rAw. .•..,.. + O.•=•••.•7 2.,-.7'—.......1.1—...,- ,-.-...-_-m—e ..—... a.uQe�i.rn•w%wc to:.maem _ -• .awe CZCDI LOT 8 �� NIM. "°' • 4.0— .o fli I wrong ea LANAVG/Ve AMA Oke 1 Ial.• G•••••AOGIR r.... ..... ztip_ a- —� I U 0 4,0 z � . i • 8_ LOT 2 . =.'Yw7.S.', ::L`iw". �- c $, Y /,,'/� ('f. I 'f �1•F" l .I t M2 WTAfMViIY WT.. IO.MC. i.4j3 Z 1 I .t.4 .."" 11 le t,'',, - 14*s s 31 ' it tt epos I l��.,""!rir �I �I TEAAI�eis 6TATW. [ . CC) Z A7 ».e•«. fruum * t do I ss" 1 t ,mow ►-•• f/ �� •,4. lip,/ ►:+w�` fir"' • MeltforMarIO • �/ '1Ii �i��iiii�� ' a,': 1 ,.. 0' �.".`,.'m..•."• • z ���.�-Aim ►i•+./ri1'44 _ • �� ► I + r��.. �.�-Ants.As ��� �� .+I !-'�r�t►.'�r=q`�• f....- LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDRESS: ..v.o......... O A'7'..�.1:: _ 2 0 i .IzI %: � �� E.aR.^OPTION • Z d a rRr"'. 4����,,/' � %._�i1 LOT. 3 O o r M- F o; I ��/` � Y fir•- ne Gm-OEM ar TRACT OF MP snu eo IN TOMS, Q w —�� , t —— ._-. I EEM6 A TRACT O'LAMP SITUATED IN THE • . i w—.w•r� SAW&NQGMAN 711[VC(.AOSTRALT Ne.523, ~_�-I I TARRANT COMM STATE Q'MAN. ..•r..rr i U I•- I STATE HISHH�WAY'NO. 114 i te r_ -• I I 1 El r 411 NORTH KIMBALL AVE. 51TE PLAN I I SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS 76092 ..... SITE PLAN 'v^ O.w M.. V cis_t MAP !GAAS I'•>o'b' Asn ANN _._._._._._._._._._._._._ CITY CASE NO. ZAO 1JL 112000 '"AI T� "--"-- %N] WETS mg- Z., A "9 lD AD t9 ^ (A 61) Resolution No. 00-75 •Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. • • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-052 7N Page 6 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT • July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-080 PROJECT: Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition RESOLUTION: 00-76 REQUEST: On behalf of Dalton Oil, Inc, CMPA, Inc. is requesting a Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Resolution No. 00-76 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) 111 Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) • Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-080 70 City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Dalton Oil, Inc. APPLICANT: CMPA, Inc PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at the northeast corner of S.H. 114 and N. Kimball Avenue. This is an existing Texaco Service Station. A portion of this lot has an existing SUP for alcoholic beverage sales for off- premise consumption. However, with recent platting of the property, the boundary has changed and no longer matches the original SUP boundary. The sole purpose of this request is the address this change. HISTORY: This site has been in existence for several years. The following is a brief history: • Light industrial zoning was placed on the property in September 1971. • SUP for sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption in March 1979. • "C-3" retail commercial zoning placed on the property in September of 1989 • Preliminary plat approved in December of 1999. • • Final plat approved in March 2000. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District NOTICES: Seven (7) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: A site exhibit is attached. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-080SUP.doc S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-080 70 Page 1 Vicinity Map • Lot 1 , Block 1 , Emery Addition HIGHI A I T ® .— EP •,►1 _ f ' / i I I 7— is_ ' " �A .. , \ I I ■I �at '- iimatifici , 2ii ESITITIMIF i mum cp I ' , ilmins , 151 -b ' lik filE Ig i 1 u J ` 141 &on im:Gr.ft,,,, Rill _I- quill - "41"41 i , _ T� 7 1.. sy m _ _fiz ) -.- 1 I — 2000 0 2000 Feet N W / � E 0 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-080 70 Page 1 r I N � • • III o n, I\� °C A-' I \ GENERAL NOTE: LANDSCAPE LEGEND, ' `T WART ° T9tr''� O —� If o.A.we a ar.n NOT TO ee K,e.a •.•••. ,••O-O.m ass •..•arm• a.Nee.•NO uW T. a•INN,%Ns INK W 'wan —.—.—.—._ r_ .4. II � avuram.. O.MONe•p.m To wwerm ""'Der ' aw NTW.aK wax+rw Wet ......e v a ... 0 I / Ir N• a a • POO N.. —-i4— LOT'J MOM.MG ORR 01 VOL MOO P• ON WO DAM I. / I MOO. s.••.•..•. K— I w•. ,•...a•m V d ew 1�,a ""'..ti..s....w....Y.b.....c.�...... 'aa.+w.r[MART-wraww L.SMG.�I..r • J O j// 0'.. 4.ii•;:vv��4it#0.14:�7O06 =.. _�> — — — — — g00000 OM— — L...... M,- • • >'a..Y. ., Q I Z ! MOLL CL _�� , --� re sere �I -. _ LOT 2 •A. s..,.....:»...»�....w.'..w p' . �� 111 I !I � 1 LTG.a,.�.... () ► - .. „f✓ 11' • GIT!DATA'J.MI•rtY TOTAL 11lMMOCp 4. IQU M I `" .••m.r. et LOTS 7, :.. 44111.•....a••o v. oil r 1 1 Q•im rives ^„ I r•' '�d ��II n-xAGo s`A�5 eTAneN I 'r' • ••••o. r.T. •a.or toe or. �I Gw..•h. • Au. It I I `' P^••.aMtl•••N.M !•1•Y. ..p••rMI.. es I ,_- , iLJ r , aara 3{� pq�l�_,,y-mil, L /0 Or.,:loA o..; • PIMA Of ON.*MINK of ST. • MIMS \ r T 17 4 T ' Y TA wLT eN•w•• On •Naw• I�J' �i � et r - • . ..�.4� �i •1 . i��" ..r �a MI Ara. 4. •r .... 6t LEGAL vEcRIPTION l ADDRE55. ▪ M. • °• , s ,puw //�4r � , EMERY ADDITION O U LOT I '.I 4�'�� /- _ t `y AN ADDITIONTO THE CITY OF yKpCE.TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS, J• J 6 �•� r — •�—— I WINS A TRACT Of LAND SITUATED IN THE ..°aria a v. )( Kar�..•rw.• 9/V�JEL FREEMAN SURVEY,ADSTRACT N•.5�3. e»ia Q °•w•w•iw.•w.aw I rr a. I TARRANT COUlfTY,STATE OF TEXAS. jSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 114 j ....o.n.o..'~� j ..�....•• S ~ ^� • 411 NORTH KIMSALL AVE. 5 1 TE PLAN ! ra I t I SOUTHLAKE, 'TEXAS 16oa2 `""""`r"' SITE PLAN Sea.A•W..• Da.Rama VICINITY MAP xALE •2o o AA ARP Is" -'—'—'— —'— — — — —'—'— CITY CASE NO. ZAOliffhL 112000 ..... AI -—V a p] *MISTS A W eD 112<9 rg- . n Resolution No.00-76 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED BEER FOR OFF- PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EMERY ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 5712, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.918 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise • consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (1) and 45.6 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: • SECTION 1. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-080 70 Page 1 Resolution No.00-76 Page 2 • A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption on the property being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition,an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. S4. 5. Any other conditions of this Specific Use Permit as stated in the motion made by the City Council at the regular meeting on July 18, 2000, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-080 70 Page 2 Resolution No.00-76 Page 3 • PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 4111) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-080 70 Page 3 Resolution No.00-76 Page 4 • EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres S • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-080 70 Page 4 a � • • •• © O Z D.) 0 00 c O O tit 0 �y ` � .n. , r••-'—•••.•�•.'.—_}} It ��•— -- SENERIL NOTE LANDSCAPE LEGEND ..-..— �'.esTv.rww .w.... 0 ).nem wro Komar new P1 row-R c ....'Y.... -- •-_ II WM • �f_ W. '�r LOT 9 m maON .. w o.'• e E. a ` f •H, :.,.....�.. OM..,. ...o—.. ..., wh+.wT ewwr nn�.ae�.ioee.r.wi z 1 ♦ z r , LOT 2 • ✓ramw ."' IMO_ - ..., X /•,/ram,. •• _ x i ~ i INS• _ ,---f 1 c••••,•• sae a r..aoawer I N TOTAL -e«w.s er VOW PIO•••••••11 Mt.G.{ 11) I 44.W OP GP et LOT 5 V t / . W j,�� . -..----. { W O. ws"�ieer.°r = 4. "�A1 7!.e.123Ti•TAUH1 1 • OMF••1 , ♦ � �� 4. tz / ..zr.=. li MOANS IMAM* • • _ 1 a MMO // I ,��`v�w..“ ....•�♦;;06 .--....•;ram,: : .i s l •a'r'�'''!ar` ♦ LEGAL DESCRIPTION a A�vREss "L::., 3 - . ,— �Ap � .ii ii.=Z_' .ram ..-.. . .p j �I/ ,�t` ��-rit 1 e.eizri.OT I n°" $ O 7_ ,/`/ L//� yM� AN AoomON To I- V — '�/// 1 , dr ,, ne Gm ar sa nwce,TARRANT GOMM Texts. 7L p O� i. �` - _ I ECK!.A TNAOT Or LAND SIIVATED IN TNe 30 Q X J). ,I.y:...... .......,.— _ SAPPEL TReeNAN m)EYeT,ApsTRACT Ne.E2,. - Q j j TARRA n.CdMTY.STATE ce=AA!. ,•�,M F 1 wSTATE MISAKAY NO. 114 �� �'"� j i1 •r .ID ...a VT �� -�.-..•r -.-. I 411 NORTH KIMBALL AVE. \\ . ^'� SITE PLAN i sOUTf+LAKe,TEXAS T'O 2 —-- SITE PLAN Q....Wpm VICINITY MAP *PALE i••]o•o' .w A/w NoxA�E CITY CASE NO. ZA0kCVM.. 112000 0—AI •4 2 T aT. a: n b sv Iro ett cn it C7 , Resolution No.00-76 Page 6 • EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. • • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-080 70 Page 6 City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-081 PROJECT: Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition RESOLUTION NO: 00-77 REQUEST: On behalf of Dalton Oil, Inc, CMPA, Inc. is requesting a Specific Use Permit for outside storage. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Tree Preservation Analysis (F) Developer Comments (G) Resolution No. 00-77 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough(Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-081 7P City of Southiake, Texas 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Dalton Oil, Inc. APPLICANT: CMPA, Inc PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at the northeast corner of S.H. 114 and N. Kimball Avenue. This is an existing Texaco Service Station. The purpose of this request is to consider outside storage of propane tanks. HISTORY: This site has been in existence for several years. The following is a brief history: • Light industrial zoning was placed on the property in September 1971. • SUP for sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption in March 1979. • "C-3" retail commercial zoning placed on the property in September of 1989 • Preliminary plat approved in December of 1999. • Final plat approved in March 2000. Plat approval included the common access easement on the adjacent property to the north. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1,Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District NOTICES: Seven (7) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, and to delete Item #1 (8' screening device); and to restrict the outside storage to 25 — 5 gallon propane tanks screened in the manner shown on the Site Plan. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated July 12, 2000. The following variances are requested: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-081 7P Page 1 . City of Southlake, Texas • 8' screening device along the north property line. • 25' Type "J"Landscape Buffer along the southern property line. There are no requested variances associated with the outside storage. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-081 7P Page 2 4 L Vicinity Map Lot 1 , Block 1 , Emery Addition 1 • R - a ii______Lrit , - - 1- €h 1 L_. % , , IIII tall D 1111111 MEM ih, 41-wint, .: �� I I-�I ■ 1 — b _, •GL N Oh 77 um LUMEN 1 li uia tI��En Mrs,..,114 .■mil raw Illift1..,• 4 MC INun s ENT! W- �� •i :JjI1pIiiIi;:rt 0 ♦ ummuumLiiimilWI:►�aITAM/III111111111►��''■ `�ir n �nraaol a■NM � 1 ■ ■ /10■111� i■ ',■ . F■/\\\li m■.�11�49,1 Lint' 11 nO 1 i �•EST ■12 ovormingeo.12����.y�, � III i - AMII///// Ns AIM.q "gom•. - I r—- rIBZ:mm am :f!�r iarm--rani 2000 0 2000 Feet N \J.W .r E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-081 7P Page 1 U ^" a) a. ell 4,0 UMW T 10 I CI I'v' 000ZII 1 gd34ovz .ON as'd0 Alice - - - - - - - - - .aaaa....o .o-or•.I a1.0.26 •---dVW J.l�z oN Nd-td albs+ N '1 Z115 ..o Lb091- Sb'X31'2>I�d'1H.Lnos I I _ 3hd TI'V 4I�I H1210N Ilb I —4........«........... w.a aw _ V 1 i I Am ID Arra > I 411 'ON .l`dMH9IN:ZLt'.L I V E "'"""•• •cv>'rai ro Lvic'uN1173 iH W.L gt x > o ma o= 'scc•wI i,•111 w•..any NV/4SW Tn+vvEV i ,.�.� •••• •••�••"r MMA cD r aw. m►DIV NW1 >ao aov:u v swaa I ——— —_ 1 --j� i svxal .wloo 1Nvrrva'Tlrwroc ro un au AN ► I 0 of Noulmv NV 1 i%4:Av ' /Ptk M.m•.. LI.I.I.I11N/fr J .3'� . •�7i: s O : «.. 'ssaaaav s Noudlaxaa iv9?i 4..4rAgXms-�fe+ . 1•4r''' T. :+ '_ AIP N r mar ns w......nr.1•a1 +� \ ••�'..• ,.••/••�� ,.�����'�4,4; • �� ..+"w~rw' fl Z t awi«m.iw..il- MO•mourrp 11 — �(�.....�..Q•�� �.�.���st►��.4A�ib'����".. _ `Ti�•�i7ft�c��' .aw. e..c... ammo r.warw� 'deli I 400 \-/ 1 --L i -ii_I �\.�!�'�'+ / I 'n a 'Al w Woe*lo•No Yaw r1 —r-—__ ' L 1_-ii ;l ... "••#,C-- 1 . , # 10••••••10,04 ./.11 Norm ..wawa •n.•r1s'fr..r••.va+r..e.+... Y I I• f f 1 uea•+nag•wory a wT r+..ee o. IV //: -1:1 i ••OM yaw armor-mow n T.w.Y9 n aad.. news 7 •n.v>, I 44t I P';. ( �'�'MN•AM ii OA r 0 l.e 11.11 .w it eM ��� \ `. I ` • IIFr1'! t H e•iCY 1 11 i 1` . ��ii iJ.Mall T/101 AMMMi V1Y0 LK ' `i I``•...•...r. 1 A1es- € • CI X :mewdog *' co*.' • —L—^C a A,. Y t-- ,� O r 4- Z aln • MO ate. ' 6 r•rw•P•Pp. •&• ''1•« ',14.2. • .. •• /.// r I TaoM. ...Y• ....• 1 i• W1tlM.e �.r.^ MIY9GOM�YO4GlM•1W11,.WN4IG .. • ..r. :a.I... NO •.L? .1I_ w • M yap. ...imam Palm Mandy NI al MM.Pnal•OM/WM ..» 4. =_ . ...ram::..,n. -- r arme . T•e aa w al. E 101 a.. a • Y-• s moo* •..r+*TONi 110.1011. �•� ..a+--w..�l "�NNW I �_ ad. : ..w weT me.. wua.. }(]( > m.tliaO.Baia 1.1a..sauna').W ON II '-^ .Y or a•A ..a' r.r .OW,.1aLq !X Y . am VW NO ia11 M1...i ON M Men•C *No*,. w•M" —.w wM. .w.Y.•, v��/�v�/�.� OiOITI i Ol JLN M LM•D i.MY.'Itl'1 1 u ...on fmIIA.0if0-1YM�AY.11.1. I 'Tr arm..16.C1A11 .e.....r.rw.�\+ U �sw..r=w.ws �j OV C-O O U N I City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-081 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 07/12/00 Project Name: Site Plan —Texaco, Lot 1, Emery Addition APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Dalton Oil CMPA, Inc. 323 W. Northwest Hwy 1450 Hughes Rd, Suite 100 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: 817-488-7107 Phone: 817-410-5163 Fax: 817-488-5396 Attn: Mike Dalton Fax: 817-410-5171 Attn: Billy Williams CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/11/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT MARK JOHNSON AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 1 Building Articulation N Site improvements do not affect existing building Masonry Standards N Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 2 Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y Shown as Platted Lighting Y 1. A screening device is required along any property line adjacent to a parcel with an occupied residential dwelling. An 8' screening device is required along the north property line. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 7/6/00:Allow as shown) 2. A 25' Type "J" Bufferyard is required along the southern property line where a 17' Type "J" Bufferyard is shown. (Variance Requested) (P&Z recommendation, 7/6/00:Allow reduction in bufferyard to provide for pass through lane) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-081 7P Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas P&ZAction: Approve 7-0 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000 with the following conditions and as noted above: • To restrict the outside storage to 25 — 5 gallon propane tanks screened in the manner shown on the Site Plan. * The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 75% for the "C-3" Zoning District. * The carwash will be subject to the noise level regulations of Section 43.13. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: J. Craig Dalton, Dalton Oil VIA FAX: ABOVE Billy Williams, CMPA, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-08ISP4.DOC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-081 7P Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00- 051 Date of Review: 6—08 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Lot 1, Emery Addition (Site Plan)Resubmittal Review #2 OWNER: PREPARED BY: Dalton Oil Co. CMPA, Inc 525 W. Northwest Hwy. 1450 Hughs Rd. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: (817) 329-6600 Phone: (817) 329-6600 Fax: (817) 410-5164 Fax: (817) 410-5164 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. There are no existing protected trees on the Texaco site but the Emery lot North of the Texaco is heavily wooded. The proposed access drive on the North side of the Texaco, cutting through the Emery lot and connecting to North Kimball Ave, is placed through a stand of existing Post Oaks and Cedar Elms. The submitted Tree Survey shows approximately 18 trees to be removed for the placement and construction of the access drive. Four (4) of the trees are within the R.O.W. of North Kimball. The stand of trees is even aged and the approximate average DBH is 10", with many of the trees being multi-trunked. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this lot. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-051 7P Page 1 • • FROM : DOUG EMERY FAX NO. : 9406462775 May. 23 2000 07:26PM P2 1)3/21too 1S:ie FAX S17 488 5188 DALTON OIL INC itiiuz May 22,2000 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Mettle Southlake,Texas 76092 Re: Barrier Wa11 To Whom It May Cancan; Being the property owner adjacent to Circle E Texaco located on the comer of 401 North !Crawl and Highway 114 in S ou1ii1 ks,Tamar.;prefer not to have a privacy wall commuted. Sincerely. Doug,Emery • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA 00-Gf31 I p Page 1 Resolution No. 00-77 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EMERY ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 5712, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.918 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for outside storage has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1(27) and 45.11 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for outside storage on the property being legally Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-081 7P Page 1 Resolution No. 00-77 Page 2 described as Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712,Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, being approximately 0.918 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Any other conditions of this Specific Use Permit as stated in the motion made by the City Council at the regular meeting on July 18, 2000, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-081 7P Page 2 1 Resolution No. 00-77 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-081 7P Page 3 Resolution No. 00-77 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 1, Emery Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5712, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,being approximately 0.918 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-081 7P Page 4 • N n ;.,. sv o � ofD cc c a(D o _ _ o' —'� n Pam-.....- 0 ¢EI�ERAL NOTE. LANDSCAPE LEGEND, N..wY uw*-aw�rwa If ..MAI...O.Nn r len TO ON ALMONDX)Q ......r Trw •r. —.—.—.—. �.�,. II \ as.e w.miYDi+6w"'..e.N TO ON�o..�m C sR.e�...ms —.". :: . " , O CD —.. - I //- y,• / /�-•�•�«.�. �) was uwr w �. ....r ._ Os. . MO ......1w-_r V — �� LOT 9 ~� -r am - '•'.....'S `T�9.—. .s"..' ir- .. OsPOWSPO .. / i •.. ' 4474�'..-444i 4NPt moo.`!'«-. : ------------- =°'"',Y .~.eO. 1 pa Or. 60 SO H !�/� �w�,..:: '. r'o _ _ _ I �� .......a �" �:�.. ------�.._..»... U 3 1 ;...:11.41:rimpilmiL_.14:� ('!I �� al V _.!_'_I .'I a� um DATA fewwr pm M.O. 1 CD LOT s Ssil NOS 0 I, 1 m4AgiiT,_no, t{ o tO ,km= _A' 044 N' ........, -,fr 6-0-j- %.,lie 6.1841M./B . it/ ; ..„...... • s1 st&,�P\ , rriT,1 I -- l 1 rv •A/W/ �I�./I�.4'».I/ ++ .i v'w - +� _ •..1.,- LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDRE55, .=,..wv I 6- O rier"...* I, 4, LOT I AN Amnia.TO he CITY Or 50VIN.AKE,TAIOtANT COUNTY,TEXAS. S p L- ` rTf�I -t - --- i WINO w TRACT w WV yTwTeo w The '.:..« Y d X s .."Zi r`T3�.ir..w.� ~-��r SA M'L rRE?IAN*AMY,AGSTRAOT MO.375. 0 1 TAWNY OOIMIY,MATE Q TEXAS. r.�Nµ, 3 0 I- \ STATE�HI6HWAY NO. 114 M�.'� - :.+ i 1 ^--j . ny • 411 NORTH KIMBALL Ave. SITE PLAN ka 1 sourHLAKe,TEXAS -rbogZ SITE PLAN x•�••••ewe VICINITY MAP xw'-E --�•.,o'-o' u...werw NO SGAP _ -' -'-'-'- -- -" -'- CITY CASE NO. ZAONONL 112000 '""AI d r� a Non ly n `ti Iy 7 eo G� to Resolution No. 00-77 Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-081 7P Page 6 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-069 PROJECT: Lighthouse Community Church RESOLUTION: 00-078 REQUEST: On behalf of SLJ Exchange, Ltd., Lighthouse Community Church is requesting a Specific Use Permit for a church. A Site Plan will also be considered. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Developer Comments (E) Resolution No. 00-78 (F) 11"x 17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-069 7Q City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: SLJ Exchange, Ltd. APPLICANT: Lighthouse Community Church PROPERTY SITUATION: Located on Greenwood Drive within an Industrial Business Park. The building is currently under construction. HISTORY: The property was subdivided in October of 1985. It was annexed into the City in March of 1986 and"L 1" light Industrial zoning was placed on the property at that time. In 1989 "I-1" light industrial zoning was placed on the property with the adoption of Ordinance 480.The site plan for this lot was approved on March 2, 1999. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block A, North Davis Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-197, Page 40, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 1.085 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District NOTICES: Six (6) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the limited scope of this request and the fact that no changes are to be made to the previously approved concept/site plan, no new review letter was generated. This site is subject to all conditions of the previously approved plans. Attached is an exhibit map for the site. Approval of this request is also subject to the following: Up to 100% of the parking spaces required for a church may be used jointly with other uses, within 300' of the building, which do not normally have the same hours of operation. In any cases where the required parking spaces are collectively or jointly provided and used, a written agreement thereby assuring their retention for such purposes shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties concerned. This agreement must be approved as to Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-069 7Q Page 1 form by the City Attorney and shall be filed with the application for a building permit or certificate of occupancy. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-069SUP.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-069 7Q Page 2 Vicinity Map Lighthouse Community Church .11111111ri• meal 1 a aa�2:.•aa1 iiI :UUUti1fJILthiL ire- 1 1/ .: rp aapa.:.Sa111 , b. . asp: uIHHIuIIIIUiI • t-i.t.-1i1,.I.D--.1,.r 00,.AL4-\.II.e-.A.,›A 11 uir4ni '• ,s14V hRIAY .PP.OI l,li, Apk clip irtvaitiftz• l 01140t 3a,q t,� .- ui ..: i /ra .■ ►Wti t.7•itsas h:CIS FITTS 1 mIt� .-, A ■4 a`r Ni i W■u,. .. 0► • II i'i11i - dig. weal 1 � kw �+ ����•740,1, ■ie" BO., �' Alan 00%Ar�*I�a' ♦►�►%. J ��►=--. ��►fit_V ♦•� I� 4 t ■W �I�:• • �461 �r. IMM11111"" NIENE,lip_ ill 1 T I .� ■1 f age at s�4•,,lim_ ilkiwpool �� i 1 1kr4 ■ �■�,i. \'�'T=ia:uiTn:.O •; 1�* . A 41 4,:44.14 UNION CHURCH �r ,_ IT "1 44i-4 riVi t!i 1 1rl 1!aV///\� C: I 2 .psi=.,. ■Will II w�� .a.r -VP- mil ,,,_ ... .• .10. williO 2000 0 2000 Feet N \J/ W � � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-069 7Q Page 1 N en t; TR 44 OI ..PATSY EIAL CAUTCW DINE D.ED.AS CD et, ' , IUD.-MED.wan RESIDENTIAL O V MOW•aanaa 1•Q P ; o y-"NI if'V07 V47635!OI��b1 Moir 44 I 1"1OI`3 _` .,•- ie_i;vI.e`P F2 D, 9T rti�:y-a1104*" 4 9 -I j _ •fig �t� A..;r �(:'.tia•A..J..."' v API I`i ms xa ',I, red ' )'r •It . SIsbL t• y1y1, .4 -, .,- .;� at mom u• _ )01ox<Pe rAv.e tn3ut . . >('1_1, __ ---vim _______ Xi. , '/7E/Ls ,ems o.f. Nr.. 0 ' ---•�+. .� r�s s�� , • _ r , li YVI .5, WY MIA znwer r,uer N�j �� :1a't ^3�3N,;Vns.: crr DATA Amer ,m. M ejQ H'Q]C A < 1 :iwsT•.STOAT AI a mu. ,(E ;Y.�NUU,�.fy'r" "NA'• Sam" TALL 7 BKlii CSNFR•Rf7XER C •I OCTGROSS u>•iU.•1 a.'Oc u ./� .� � \� ',dn.q'3 `t '' Kt eLBLO‘e•1 �.[ WNW I-1 -.YLLDt M a yrt rwvre•.Si r �l' r Pt'VII.+ r yn rMiw[.s,r .i dN7b SLUIET LOOM N� v.»irc[.v,n.s r I. L+ i . xm'twr •rrt[-Ytsn 3f -, i01D.1-I L U.D.-um151RW e ; m 'sm staur[i.uY•Y,NI 3f. 1 i IP' "•yY. i ua. rmr ennrc ew."..0 3f. i ► LLD.-MISTRAL o`e .°1M!-s v41: Wit. c a�on•Ls e13ir y., A, ..1.on AREA_*SA Sr.•i+i ,y.1't y9,44r,..•,.�"-' AAu 31 •D Ac '�, ssarc�mrr°ssea mace wn ) .5'. i C +E or c t S'° 1 ►/Ieorom,uncsrua3)(,inis0) 3 nmvn Aco.c rx3=S{i i i i Mdi A LI • • .>vMA - N �lhod7 L�y/p HM�P y 7: �L • 9 i saw. .r / r,, _ •�II W_-. .. .ti'1,INSr YA y ► '' ` P ma•TE Mali tTFYALr Q ' ' : ' // ——— �, ..r 1ta l< .r.. <i X xs I I ' I SPrr - I,/ x-4 A A•- -, sr ►•, i riQ et, gyp` ��\ .- — ——--— �P Y °°-— a e•wc u•l I! l x ' — •—-- '-(\ - 4 :_ I 7`SPICES V x AY •_ 31C�F l 0 I1 SW a. , ' _J Q. / v p -. I t `'. , NC c Ay q r . " y rI. u[\He T was v x r • .I.wa`sr.A..l13ia tli...,.iYaJ,_. .�-a:.-:.r�...f� ' L c u w-i.�--_ate _Sy,.tel' S M fl' N u. _- —,. -`.F. 1,...... R.SOOS eD j, L•410 A.ALI4'AL' 3•. I r- 3 R•2o.v GREENWOOD DRIVE 1 L.K9' I 1 __ _—_—_ — _—_—.—_—_—_--_—_—_—_—_—_—_—«TE PAVED 57RFE1) I....-- e7s —_—_---_—_—_—....,,, •c_—_—_—_—_—_--_ f 1 1M'y lS• // A.G/Ill LAE Y7"" 1 Il ,.., �1f � r , , I ICANER TN[S A CANTON CO.WC. j I V / / LOT IR :IED1 5M e0-713 APPROVED SITE PLAN 07Y CASE NO 94-32 LOT 1 ONER.BITER EM.LY VP LTD \ \ Ij I BLLCA'B L.UD.-INDUSTRIAL I BCCYJC B LNFD.1 1 \ Y LID. vAAKiTRW SutVRT CHART-BUFFERTARDS LOT 3 SLR-MART CHART-INTERIM LANDSCAPE LOT 3 •0143._iM rMi M, A r�Mr� .�WI,YiWA.... 1.30.A Lsn a.(_.M Av.90.4.14. LOU.. •,1.. V-IS V 1 1 • A7.., 4M, I 1 ' SITE PLAN Ir_W MI' V-IS V 1 1 V I.v 114.1 S,SN 011 3 A 1 W w.... I. s•-A 3Al - LOTS 3 t 4, BLOCK A w.u11 n• •-. . A N b NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK E. .1...1 m •-A S S Y 'arrow CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LOT 4 L ,)L,— -' OTT OF SOUTH LAKE /..W . •-A I D $ 1/+....a'.N.s tan.Ate.SI..N.e/Cow iPROJECT « a-A I 7 • 1M LSA M7 A.a_r (34 A) MAY < K gg 1 c3 Q 2� O TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS '� 4.:LLOCATION i SLrtVRT OIART-BUFEE3E7'ARDS LOT 4 M..w a� ffi . a"I SA • `-'"" PREPARED:.IAN.20,1999 I••► 2 F •N.n.. TART A.1 a.r r r•.••Y. CTL S101 we TON IIJn®AT A?*ac a a 0,ratio mTe REVISED:MAY 2L,2'OOD — ld.. 1.011 ..•A •-fT t.. 4M AWS M P I A. a PA.•eST&Rml 0131106 LWAAP A.GIT-a-.wr TART 3.3E221 A A.T.I. 0.6.1 Ts' V-a . • a /FDA. MAME Mali a 3.IMVI. .r...I al.' V-n . •• a ••I* QaE7t, Sl1IXC11IN'E PREPARED BT1 B.CJ. I� Ir rw.I m V-A 7 . , USW SCALE: IF.p' 257S EXCWIY,E BLVD. 490 5.tax. TERRACE _ M.... m V-A 2 S IL ow E771 MFBrtA/m 1 SCLI7•N:E,TIXAS UM Rat IOMLN,TEXAS 7fIM MAR. T LOCATION MAP HaiPa: n . • p. E 'i�. �•• .zA I L FAX:L01P, 50 750 IQ = ' eD 17 • II \ CLOSET ��� `— `\./ .7\\) / . . AA . _... . _. , . . .. .._ 1'4C ' 4/</i111' .4 46 , ..,04. ,,, ,,, , : ,›\ N SUNOAY SCHOOL, C5 gI0 WOMENN D 210 GREENWOOD, C RCH EMEN tt.=21 E. NURSERY suNOAY SCHOOL 2 // I 13 R.x'Sn < ' Room w< GI I 17 tt.6.0 is x41 M1. I 11. / / sVNOAY SCNOOl7 PASTOR RECEPTION WORKROOM Room �i 10tt.x1JM1. Btt.x17tt BR x131. lam_ i CCU t • Case No. Agenda Item •\Attachment C ZA 00-069 i;: RE�U MAY U OOQ Page 2 LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHURCH 7801 Brandi Place, Ste. 120 N. Richland Hills TX 76180 317-427-4763 1 ax: 427-2530 May 25, 2000 To the: Mayor, City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission of Southlake Thank you for considering Lighthouse Community Church for a special use permit on 2050 Greenwood Ct, Southlake, TX. We greatly appreciate your time and efforts within our city. Lighthouse Community Church is a congregation of 65 committed people who after several years of using a borrowed facility look forward to occupying a more permanent facility. The facility located at 2050 Greenwood Ct. will be used for our church services as well as our offices. Our office hours will be Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Our service times will be Sunday from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM. We do not foresee using the facility during peak business hours other than our normal office hours. Occasionally we will be itilizing the facility for weddings and special services. This will entail usage on an occasional iaturday during the day and some special services starting Friday evenings at 7:30 PM and commencing through the weekend. The congregation of Lighthouse Community Church looks forward to becoming a strong church body within the City of Southlake and meeting the needs of those within Southlake. Respectfully, ( ' Paul W. Brown Administrator Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-069 (� Page 1 rtrrTI ' °GOO Resolution No. 00-78 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK A, NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-197, PAGE 40, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.085 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for a church has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as"I-1"Light Industrial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (2) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a church on the property being legally described as Lot 4, Block A,North Davis Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-069 7Q Page 1 Resolution No. 00-78 Page 2 Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-197, Page 40, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 1.085 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-069 7Q Page 2 Resolution No. 00-78 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-069 7Q Page 3 Resolution No. 00-78 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 4, Block A,North Davis Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-197, Page 40, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 1.085 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-069 7Q Page 4 Y � o f° i-d ..___.,_. .,.�._ (D o,,..- IR TA GMtR+PAM ETU[ADA. VI i r . LS1343t AG Wt. I.•rm.p96Tt RfSEERVI 0 fI iI iNi i� ai - — -- le52 4�IZ 3.0 50441�l: ..w re r TAro ISf�yai rrfir s"'-- sn . -._.♦ '/A, .. _ iri . s Y. s .r , r �V _ ' r • cr 4 � i I" _ ' 1 " 1 � 5 ,-v _ Qs ' . a f - � } C./mom o x, �.—_ili.�: rewaiilirir a.3 lR"� 'T,""J oa•- _., •--.•..J �I 8LX.K A I ,,,t ifr .•�44�''' s�nu vnner . Et, BLLCX A ao-a a,v.Ec a we Man a(441 amt. i!l ill g '• •'..' 4„ Ar 1; .: ' w�ER,sr ry MM. N .. ,i...� `�_�, Pfti' v� •.bs ti Tam i_i E u.o.•Earstcw. , It Mt LorAe. •-t ' Cst,k, I T*.y , . li u n...asrreu oakt t Ile St "oTa . w i mem.Ma.aim, ';, rwimlo,.•A• - ,.q I ,_ .mMMOWi*ei r�,aPIIEN -' O.•A � :r Eat:'. _ en „ wenn P.m ntc•.J A ... .f 1 I I ra �< .4 a.,y -� e. �' ...a,E�1 !l i i I �? Tn X /.� T Txr I lr, i esT iTxrI ►�C e Tkrl Nr - y^I r r . 1. AI :r i = r+ R � N p.?3!lM' t-_�S .AP�Y M-.....�....a 1¢S 3- .. ____ _. .. R.5OA I"h i• F L•MY p.AG'JY fE' wn J r.7' �p R �� GREEN6JOOD DRIVE t ��•A L'x'y -... (COMP'ETE PAVED 9it¢t) 1 tli w ( I / .Th Ti— ....,„:" ......,! I —---- ----- OJ.fA T xeRA G.,iM(J.vG----- i I p / / LO7/R LT@ SR EFY.1 awee:eTIER TAMI-1 UP LTD M?T5N110 WY R,.UT`USE.TA 33 COT LTm-� j / d'IXFB WD..IQ61.ML I BCRXB LyD.MIs„y.L 1 I 1 sUTMRT OMRT-BJFfSTTAkD9 LOT 3 5Urrtm T OMRT•-ERfRILR LANDKAPE LOT 3 1 l�L�'!E ®B©� ;':.a=.�`- '~-(S.� SITE PLAN ©laM©111121Ma7a7a:711/13=11 22 A° e. i . • a w =7Ciiora>.p�ew.is -� Pa—y.. e ` = LOTS 3 4 4.BLOCK A tt��® ��tt NORTH DAVIS BUSINESS PARK 91TTART OMJTT-INTER=L V 4PE LOT ©o�o��© T 1 L't ,' r_'`1� CITY of SourH LAKE PROJECT m®B�BBBAi .'-'•'.•A= >.M1 I I CD NI Ay s 0 2000 TARRANT C M r, TFYdS t.Ov.TION -"—,.r, s� '� PRVISIED YN,, 02 L SU'TMRT(M U-El flERARDs LOT M. m . t a Y i S W.. ..... AE..e.m,T.,a.o>..< ar.� REVSER uTx,axn -. S •.r-r,. r' n wEEt t.v. v..SW,itr ..cwc kat.w.cwo+..Ty,.:.ma.A Ma. s r-n re.. Walt mrari...n sa r-n ; T• a I/s CAM SITE.,... iffl'PSP1L we. 6L.i. E•(. w ...r s . 1 SCALE:1'=2d m3 vT>.at-s eLw J\D s.tax tiorTuce !M n.u+ s a-.Ai 2 EAxE,TE45 WV MUT AORTA,TEXTS For' -- .. V-, ©.otan�..A I it i CAC leTiJ -0 n 104ATION MAP tr b B to g t'DD Resolution No. 00-78 Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-069 7Q Page 6 City of Southlake, Texas 4 STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-078 PROJECT: Mirage Car Wash RESOLUTION: 00-79 REQUEST: On behalf of Mirage Car Wash, Ltd., Dr. Gene E. White is requesting a Specific Use Permit for the placement of a shade structure at Mirage Car Wash. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Specific Use Permit and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Developer Comments (F) Resolution No.00-79 (G) Letters from Neighboring Property Owners (H) 11"x17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy(Ext. 743) Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-078 7R City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Mirage Car Wash, Ltd. APPLICANT: Dr. Gene E. White PROPERTY SITUATION: The Mirage Car Wash is located on the east side of N. Davis Boulevard approximately 450' north of W. Continental Boulevard. The only change proposed to the site is the addition of the shade structure. The "Future Personal Services Shop" shown on the plan was part of the original approval but has never been constructed. The property is subject to Corridor Overlay Regulations. HISTORY: The original site plan and specific use permit for Mirage Car Wash were recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, 6-0 on June 8, 1995, and by City Council, 6-0 on June 20, 1995. It should be noted that the approvals preceded the adoption of the Corridor Overlay Regulations. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, T. J. Thompson No. 1502 Addition, involving 2.00 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District NOTICES: Fifteen (15) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200'Notification Area 1 1 Outside 200'Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (4-3) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 24, 2000, and to delete Item #1 (masonry support columns) and to approve the S.U.P. for a period of one year. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated 7/11/00. The following variance is requested: • Allow metal support columns where masonry is required. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-078SUP.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-078 7R Page 1 Vicinity Map Mirage Car Wash namm ■► t is - \yim:7ok .0�$ -1 pa A REf!F.� ����� iI1II*tiiE gm w _....,,,....ltyr,www �vi .;: Min= xi 11014111111.1 ge::q.P•• i �■ qua 4-ib.�1 ma•mi. ��� ga .y *IOW:op4r•� 'r■■11Ei■Ie�-�i�•�$,■r'�u'1r op E /A.I' �■■■r �I',, 11�\IOW 211PO ��■m �mil:14—1* VW,v. •• •��iii•limyr*. �■111 , I 1� � � •%1''gPlw�w 7. IaCJ'1 vas I�� MIR OM G1■i.■■i■■■\����'�����11 filliii N. I willeettlirrill ildarlicial les ►. H`�'V ill P1 , •„ ; . I 11o1usuj, i`l �� -Q:m.■ 1.1:. A0ii , ... _rst.;444, pifriat.,mal -4.., ,, -.!:1,... ,r... 4,,, .......t. i„,r_ 2000 0 2000 Feet 1"—'' N / �W E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-078 7R Page 1 Nten'._. \lJ I. — 18OW 184 nb.wdINC- . CIO— ,, 1i. W E.Fr.e.. • . ' 6C e.Ih,a�l -141 -14- SIORTR DIVIS WETNESS Ada I I I >_____- JOx.t S+J ti t K Y.Y.' �``� , , - 1• 1 �.y..�-..T: j . to. j ' derepere w.D., I S U I'E `, r x 1wr..r IiF2 181 1818 "i- S47eAdns il:sioiles 6f ...v.. B.IhM"g; j1 RFIgYeu I -i r 01 Le" I I era 3 AO' loll ... A I, N-1'B..e. -Ac era c ill t uT3l.rr Rrie • a•1 1 I 1 v I _ ! I04.2e 1 �.. ADJACENT OWNERS hl f �� N ue'4� e.I■ a r4' _ "- f CMIMI �97i.21' •♦ '\ AND ZONING Is K I` - "° "3 �' _ 1_�,_....- _,. _ '�,!�t33kd-� -- . \ �� 'l I ♦y. I "a."5 .-s7.. . _ ® i.�t IRED IR tIYARI)5. `� ,� .� o axe }kt7°- 4 & I 2 si•'.., - — — _ ,d...—'�w) —r �I.h o 1A wa. ,v y . b `1 w.L �.�Amid howled nem Ur Sr" �,r.l �"y • s [ Der Wooer rt %. �,:s r tip" ''� \ ��/II �_sL S . %• ._.. I IrekCL I ▪ 1� -i7#f�? � ' ., ' , s.r s_I._rs ---r . :r s_-- + r ' F :1 f-� iw.RR M-c> .r 1 1 12 d IroYe IR ) '�. > ip I '.av 4 I, z _A,• -ca e I J = • �' a .�,l oll 'd' I V 74:1I H lit I' _sin Emil.• ...1 ' � \ \ . i /i � -'{��®`�„*"• / \ IN'!$p1I L� jT�ac4 �\ ; I 0 e er .' 1(I; '1 164 11s .pi.- `vim"<S4...9 , , `3i ./ •, , \:/ •) — i"g.-rrd •� $ &I 8- a at ru I: -M. • i. �%�4' : 11� II A.s IA Am 'in+ MS .��• , r _ S _ 1 � i � ,r3 �;. t1r �:.-Alai' � _ � 3 ; _ "�; '/ ,r - =� �-- I y• l'c� �� r. a ,) \ 6i�fir,�' 1 :..IY T�.e. 3 3 I i fi . - dr r. ./" .J1n.AI Tie t o 1 ; 1 1 ff • N �r�\ >6 >s \ x• JJ y t 1 . i ,. .e • � I�ti ff f� syttic r �l, I \ \II.White ` 1\ �1` V Y si.ol.... ' •Y•A- �J `.. 1 AG . ,Iy�.. .: �r1��� ` �"4.,. ♦ i,,?4, • e, ,-'. ,.1 ,. n=:ti'. , \� \ S I - 11m • N.Ihr,,.l l: 'Ien x 'i l ' a.. i - ''R,sl �a41rIIsi' = ♦ .. " ..tee•' 4 ;� 2'21int Nll.gc Llbscr,►F4i N. A Boats 0 If.e ,� cswlei �. T +lw.inr J�." �.�Il r',_1p \\ ° ,•1 .. \ I \ \� .M. _ _ i7.tr.�„li�► ,araS�r'Y .�• .s ".— .nadu.e •`7�j � is•■ r Lli-1 ti i2 iiw�.rr. USI Jua _ ,,�.._ • ♦` LI:.D• . Ir NI:" t.'1 .. 4* f•M•4444.-W__517C‘16d11tIG '\ III• Ire" yI 1 /Iaa'r' 21 \ j I(f ' - - Y-o NI(.tl ON.tl•av IM I3N4 U.%ea -IL limbs f�ii1! 2Y�o 1 la++ l ao .1 j / I l ►loll',roam OPI`2 Odd".a•• .'. w,a1r'C.'He AlL �, 1 A. t u ®p ; - PIMP Ia,fsa aNv -- 4x.w•J-•rr./wall Ra•Vg ��'� $BITE 1•Mltic: ALI+aN MAL//10001 014 F.M.-RAaG R56 4.4ThTICN 41 r 9e ' ; 1. %c LT1Uj7 IWM�I*r(TMorrswo- •„3I 1. T. •. was "gird we reed re I,No 6l�Ktea1(1' •ELW.. GRo.>Zo Harm .K oslow y �` dw r.qd f: you s n.d LUD:- I"'JY. SITE PLAN! *�.,,,RIJAN� .�•. er....br+ ._loll _.._.i.a .. ucool_. '�' _ 9[AG:r-xr a uazgimout,- .r.ro�..r .w..■ nI a I•Y.1/M 4 V r 0.... ��� _LLBel9L- w .rr.wr • u..wy - 94031 .�'. a`.r....... t r.r..yA. TROFIPf a o.sa►,. T 7.4I--�.-v.cool.<—�.rr R+,w n 'w .e,hM• - ar.r Gl �J tie • 0 Id 1•Ti 1humn.. SITE. � .�.ti w m.n t.Lr n ~mow x w • Iw15at Addiur PLAN ...�n rLr n ,a...� .i4r;cool t - 5F:4 0d m �e. �. W= .w. 1 us �A 86 REC1 .iL ,' ,L00[ /,r/� �_ ..,,.t �.., ,.Am 0. _ Al V 1 _ .+ Lnl• d.• .Nr f�N... a �� eD 1.! . /wwt Wrrw an.ma•a Odd.Olio NO r.l.rk p '. `ry5 1.r >........ y 4 1,+ I ^,.1.g WO aA r v dd.= o•.a�..0 0.. r.aYe.W..' P tb �.+.�.�. o.._. n..L... w.e..sr >. "Case No.ZA95-55.. .•t• �...�" :':: .._....w .�..�,.. rz Izl t-.,,,/71 L(X'AT MA P I 2� n i _ { a r Q A "% k iY Y h-n,r a Z 7 g ,rti S lt'"-04,v' ,y 4 '*" ,;'1';1��,..,�'o� + _ � l .s ` Y.k ' s' a ye•# ,Rtix a ^ j -;'S f-> ��Nx � ;4.',i1 a rSx � 4 V� tC= fa� ,k-., sil4 xi- a :Y �->,. y fs r a� rat^ a r �.9w. fi43u 5rp k " t5i h r . '. taL t� a ax t 17 oft, r4� � �` rya ¢ � 4r o o", a6y s2i tr t4 ,vlv4,�°� ,� ' p . t v4 , w K :O • '•� t a ° t Rw s ,3z y ;r / s {M ; i ' o AO � ,, 2 t r '. ." a 7 V • • rl Y c4 5 ;s • I t \a S5 }» R` I. ..,+o 'M1v " J` ve �. .YR'i No l'Y�..�u ^37 jY y+41, rt f' adt "i Y°f" �,1 y\ \ c1,, 'i01 (-4,,'�-t'`,a h Et:9q1- 2 F r:' ,..-. rn ,y� 7 ^��' • "s ax .i r a �r Jra ,. r Y ;'i #I;,f t t: 'F at . yf $r'4 '�s3 t •,Tg7-kr4. ; 4 i n3 •}'f�,„S!ir"+... '4' , Ca, r N��j.( o ,-. V . a Y > ems.'�. �! x t eL Yj��y� � Y.r.':err ;,�k .� �5"_;S' R� c a�'•,z' ° �,$_,• `�a� 'f"� �di., a^-1 i.- 4y�t1 t Y�. v+p' da r�x ' �'� �f a CM CD by �h`t � a,�fv v,. R y.�'4�y�`A„� fi y7i w I4 � '' , it V E. s' r a" , . 4. , ' 3. ` r ay _4r • ......_ port_c ou a eifii au ieuerMi Structure International, Inc. '� I - �?C�-966- . C US CD n REC ya2�'00 www.sunports.com _� 7) c - LY) Li City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 00-078 Review No: Two Date of Review: 7/11/00 Project Name: Site Plan - Mirage Car Wash APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Mirage Car Wash Frank L. Meier Associates, Inc. 1369 Knox Road 6510 Abrams Road, Suite 670 Roanoke, TX 76262 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: (817)488-1497 Phone:(817) 647-0832 Fax: Attn: Dr. Gene White Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/12/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 1 Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 1 Building Articulation N Not affected Masonry Standards Y See Comment No. 1 Impervious Coverage N Not affected Bufferyards N Not affected Interior Landscape N Not affected Driveways N Not affected Lighting N Not affected 1. Corridor Overlay Regulations require support columns to be clad in masonry materials which match the primary building. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 7/6/00:Allow as shown) 2. Change the "Case No. ZA 95-55" in the lower right hand corner to Case No. 00-078. 3. Update the revision date to that of this most recent revision. P&Z Action: Approved (4-3) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated June 24, 2000, with the following condition and as noted above • Approve the S.U.P.for a period of one year. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-078 7R Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas * With the exception of the canopy structure, this site plan remains unchanged from the date of original 110 approval by City Council on June 20, 1995. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\#CPLAN-1.WPD • • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-078 7R Page 2 69111 FRANK L. MEIER ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN June 12, 2000 Planning&Zoning Department City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Revision of SUP Case No. Z195-55 Gentlemen: The proposed revisions for the addition of a sun canopy as shown on site plan drawing A-1 preserves original SUP conditions. Respectfully Jim T. Phillips Architect JTP/pp RECI) J U N 1_ 2 2000 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA 00-078 6510 Abrams Road•Suite 670•Dallas,Texas 75231-7224•214/221-8855•FAX 214/221-4242 Page 1 7A Resolution No.00-79 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A FULL SERVICE CAR WASH SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION NO. 95-20 WITH THE ADDITION OF A SHADE STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, T. J. THOMPSON NO. 1502 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2657, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.00 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the operation of a full service car wash subject to the conditions established in Resolution No. 95-20 with the addition of a shade structure has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (37) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-078 7R Page 1 Resolution No.00-79 Page 2 OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for Specific Use Permit per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (37) for the operation of a full service car wash subject to the conditions established in Resolution No. 95-20 with the addition of a shade structure on the property being legally described as Lot 2, T. J. Thompson No. 1502 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2657, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 2.00 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Any other conditions of this Specific Use Permit as stated in the motion made by the City Council at the regular meeting on July 18, 2000, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-078 7R Page 2 Resolution No.00-79 Page 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-078 7R Page 3 Resolution No.00-79 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 2, T. J. Thompson No. 1502 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2657, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas, being approximately 2.00 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-078 7R Page 4 • N r) oce oZ 0-.Ir 0O 00 LA z r-ie, I1\1r z o 6C c.r., t w.; ,.i �^'.T ----tarnr MVrS auwPaSS PAIL- ) zeal. 1 Dr. rw. C, / a 1 .ar..r k.das.. a J aw. �6F2 ► Lua_ I I r A l ,r..a... .... 1R1 1B16 I s t E:i.Y.x 6F ..a.. . /I ``F E I r r v ii ` 1 - .� Yak C L.3 ` 11 it Ws.. M! L I I. Y.k c'�: ..�'urwm�.sswN� ?1 1 I I F a, _..____ __ - ix sP ' �.- ADDJAcENTOWNE4w �� :_ Na►'.rs a.. .... --.• ..a.« '�9•raal' - 1 y G�a° r I a ..,,,_.,I,...4441.` $ ,6. , OM ate• k',-.-7-atu •"`us �,,, —_4,� .1 rsiil fit Ek ac w.. c pi g a...•har.r wF«6.- Y�,'. \ t3_*�:�, �, �� -u�u k- �s ` I i rzij 611 cs s • . ',(i a [�'y. w. c>- r-r� -c . ,� t .N:,j�a ,,gy1 CAQ f r i :sf I T..•,.�`r'�`.r+.r fr.4p. �04,.. . y� � "rYi �r Ii I .ram '-y3. t..a �.wT i0S Y P .� f 1�_ J 21 ' yy`��yF'yr��6. ;7 s'L••; !s -• .. Yl__A fiT-1�v? _— .rc' • s CIF '� I ., h+/ 1 Dj &ri '+s.e . \ s1 ,r`1V, !',�; .-J ri....,_IwrN9 4t,..1144 1 i I h+ c �e"r,� J Q.. 1 f i''I P.I d® a°P izs yr .i Kr VI '.V�h4 I x F W y,. .. �' t%,��1 moo1, 1R Ar.� SM%d--.. YI I .r_I^C t, � t 1�eD I V y . �f_ *W 6 %" .. i. ...air.:. .�'a*c sx ,i s ,s Alto.* � � �< 414. d+%. n'a I .emu« i r a '.tl uw'w ? ?� ;.-L PI ` fi / ' �` ,� \ s..ru.. and \ us .,8 z �° •as• .g A.yy i , ., ,- g49440 "f AiN4)1% ` a,�Y /,- 'r,i • 1 , 1` 1 i I V p C i ! M=A14/1. ,.' ,..gatiel 41r: Ai,2.914,:',:j.,'''' 1? t.,,,__.. .1„,,_,,, „6„..............LAYArNNP1144‘ --1'.'''... A ..rr 3 i a1-1, r. _r am ^sG�Y ..,�.a...411'1 a•w (p ' _1- 4 sp.'+f5.s�v 4I1 (�UITI-. iY- Wa L4°�v.Yrao h 21 - ` \ w.n .w »'a axu..o ua trA4 t wr, c ri.... a f .i..y,ema Du.s ca.•.4.. .x. wqa a«e ar+. a o; { PIMP f«.sc."u 4 e...4 we-r....Nwc -'�• ¢aNc11 1-VdK: A4.m:maw f eM F.M.Rava 0,136 4's VrwN 41«u .�. "3 ao'unutY bwwrM(M.o...) '+..�+r ua.rc .r.cws .ir.r Mr.. s+w PT RIGOrr /LPN wvo•so YIANAr 1 sa...o..w: s."'."_' ___ . "6"4 s w�v.�i LVD LLD SITE PLAN! wm. r �+'a�... aAA...... ... 41, '.e�..e .w... .>ar ps. y a. S. Ve w.. "^�"'" TMrdY .i D.Ow.. rt:...::.-....... W.,. - la SS uyp SR 0 ...Lra.rw.r.. Slrf. .�....�... M.a r..Wr a.w.. PLAN r: �. �, RE4JJIiZOUt! Al A o... .._. .......-...,a.. �, .............a........ .,.... as �. w:� � ,�.. _ • °i 121 0„.0(n ult-A . MAP r Z. bS 1vrp CD - 1A1.11 ' Resolution No.00-79 Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-078 7R Page 6 1NV 111..L' 1 V 11,4 11.1\L.1£JJ rIJJrL'1\1 I v VV 1N.C1(3 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-078 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Specific Use Permit per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (37) for Mirage Car Wash for the operation of a full service car wash subject to the conditions established in Resolution No. 95-20 with the addition of a shade structure on property legally described as Lot 2, T. J. Thompson No. 1502 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2657, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas,being approximately 2.00 acres. A Site Plan will be considered with this request. The property is located at 955 North Davis Boulevard being located on the east side of Davis Boulevard (F. M. 1938) approximately 200' south of Greenbriar Drive. The request is being submitted by the Applicant, Dr. Gene E. White. The Owner of the property is Mirage Car Wash, Ltd. The Current Zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District. A public hearing will be held by the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday, July 6, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter, it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake, Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake, Texas, 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-078 I am (in favor of), (opposed to), ndecic ed abo e request for the following reasons: '/<e.„-- t. ice: t � Gl!� dew / 11-e,r_.ze �d—:C' / Cz�u"may lrc SIGNATURE: ..� •--s- r (Please Print Name) /c /F%'/I f ADDRESS: R � J U1Y 7 2000 PHONE: /l %`c%i'ii.�� " <X / 'c S ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL*** Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA 00-078 7R Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas f STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-066 PROJECT: Southlake Chamber of Commerce REQUEST: The Southlake Chamber of Commerce is requesting a Site Plan in order to build a new office building. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) 11"x17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-066 7S City of Southlake, Texas I BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Southlake Chamber of Commerce PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on Corporate Drive approximately 300' north of W. Southlake Boulevard and 400' east of N. Peytonville Avenue. The site plan proposes a 3,162 square foot one-story office building on a 0.458 acres lot. It is part of the larger Southridge Lakes Development which includes residential properties to the north and commercial uses along Southlake Boulevard. HISTORY: The property was zoned to "C-3" in September of 1989 and is part of the Southridge Lakes development. This portion of Southridge Lakes was originally platted with the intention of having a major anchor retail development. It was replatted in September of 1998 into smaller individual commercial lots. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4596, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 0.458 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District NOTICES: Five (5)notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area 1 Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved(7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 29, 2000, and to delete Items#1 (dumpster requirement) and#2 (stacking depth). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 12, 2000. The following variances are requested: • Commercial properties shall provide on-site dumpsters. • Required stacking depth of 28' when 20 or more parking spaces are provided. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-066SP.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-066 7S Page 1 1' Vicinity Map Southlake Chamber of Commerce L__ ��Alai%v■lii■ ;' - - IIIII Aiii lai it .�ge■■■ � vIIMMO MI .* O �111kCMENE iii _ T -r o°rrn roomIM=IF 0iik- .iirrism 4toi ..s. y.4 .IL►A :��'teilii, tiI111n .1111,111 .� ill Mil r►T33oT:�r-�♦�♦♦�i1. C�i �I umint�=♦1 .�.�---=• z ■ I..n•n■■ s►♦ ♦.u■■ ow ♦ ■■ilmwa11111. 4 1 IIVEVE:a \9■► ,►► •G* v �., t.!4f.i�,1 E. ,_= .1111E ii11Vs--♦��1 •��\1� �:a�.,� K. ;Vali:im..� ��Ir :VI 'CAM rnm a 'It ' ar►.• w 1.dr „ram $141'44• 1,117a - iumlIlluw .,0 . ...10). v110•011 its 4 ANT'iyi.40 ill mit "1 . III I 11111.1100111111.11K111151 .Alliii(11 rizixostiffe rattivir vi wr II mismositv-4 .: ..4.Lt'l:111 'I W 14-1**i.4.04111P' °E'"IWO I 5,Ams.O. 1W BO•rnPin IP 1 - ow---Fres.,..•.1.•••um in.: 4.•-• "4% ' 41 billF .,■ _III • tau►'� ♦ • . a 1■■f,�g/dA •1 is .0 ��r • — - . I I I ��1 I ' .-limmINIMMI 5,....i•11�\���j��1i �j".y '■ 1 ,_, , , 1♦r l*4 A NO2 .1■i■—.■� ♦♦ �� �.�i uo C 4,10:• TorUNION CHUF.CM r'i!!1 ► t/.irest■1111111Imiy 2000 0 2000 Feet iilimimm A‘,... � �W E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-066 7S Page 1 N f� •• :,.a.....<• •' �..Aa. . ti v ... ,.,.o as a �.e�a ,..e� . — — — — — — — — —�— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —� _ — — — — — — Orz,Nq-\\ N. --_ (/ �a ! CORPORATE CIRCLE ++°+, " \ `�' m+`� `�••� 8U"MARY CNARi-BIFFERTARD6 ! YIGRdI.Tf MAP hD 'a { - ^"'RR`fl'••••" `\ •� °e e ' i �RWI�R. Raa I �\`� '� � .....,. .aO,Q w• ,y i II N' u.•. •..• tki I P •I W .r. ! slTe r I ; i u• I MA R.R. r..A• ... ::,ry ; I wr waPl.•Fa ar Y-•v• s • .w I y ••-.Jx;(r „o.e..e : 'a f.•1' 14.,4n; 0 i tilIN‘ E ue+.•ww•a.owaw Wk •YR1•I�tO b.m�R.wc.KM M.PLAC..Rp ALL.A,.�M I >i �� -�7� I Ili V ! .•..»a.rAP•.w«R.R.,oR I i ;Iti-1,....»..�. r; f � al J J sR. i ..Dw P•,...'� a...Rm rt.wr,rR..l..e.rlQ.eD ar Fa�..M 1 h ♦ III I- f anmwNc..•uw 00009 clMO 11.uD..a.,IWO. 1 I'' fl i 1 ,' 'R' r� 8 mO• .•II.00OWNROME i t • ...o. . IP In u; I ».E....M R.»..•..m...a.w j Iv ll N .a»d• it I yy I.o.M.0.00 m.o 0 1-1 R.a II • 111 +J I' j i :eR,n o .D".i.•.+.o w v nr- II' ar 9 • .,o;t{....a.. r I FI 2 N III • p i // A. 1g I I SITE DATA 811T1ART i n „5 i I d SITE PLAN ,(i C! /' SCALE: I'.70'0' NORTH • •i I ,.. .af «'"''",-t_.r—,r_0 e I :I 1 a SUMMARY CHART INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Icoss cww�°s...ow PO.nw a•a LOT T BLOCK b i 8 u u _ SOIITHRIDGE LAKES,PHASE C-1 S ` '.10•TJ•101.eR KO M. ACCIM H—•I.nw0.E.eaw.0.R j aa.oe • 8011THLAKE,TEXAS j I iE u 2. j ....e.F..CRr.e.CR• >„ . a I CV .°.�.. GENERAL NOTES I I• o.aPt.a • .P.ou o 1 z 1 El I .r4-4.r w,-,--edllel• o rtrza ^' `,74:T'..�.s..�i"°Y%k.'a.,... DE ..o'a.w"o..'w''..v ueer,"..�.ea a..�D..x, 'rRD..n,' .24 r.uxum MO emoww TO D I , a -ILL oases rn.elfl.ce NOTED I •w . .. .. •IVMep N'RebEbEee.o.11DW ! F-� I �r SO I -ne OTT H eal.,a...T R HOT Iwrwe..• I �- I F' • p.•,e..a POW.,E ASLwC2r!i p OM RIf.R,C,lola I 1 u ..MT NCRANON OF PER DEED RE.:RICrI.NY I P.. ».:.».P...� j PR,a�.�.a.m. »b...a...a..P..Df•.O... Iail, �.a w00 .o'�.n3= aaw.M1.»..a• n.w oOA 0.1R r.w.s•'a I PRIOPP•D NI,rwaEeapu.OFFICE I El u CA 000 •LM. O.0ER OWTM.iRE GIMIBER OF COMIRCE I c Q j R: A:a�». `,Pe .p j eo.eo sxes. I fl ewna•RE,TExAE Len ICONTACT.PR2 F MARE r.•V et •}.I I .... 1 - - - - - -- — - - I .L1._.------- - - — �� ------ -------------------- - — -- �- I — SITE SOUTNLAICE BLVD.(MNi709) @ City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-066 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 07/12/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Lot 7, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Ph. C-1, Southlake Chamber of Commerce APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Southlake Chamber of Commerce M.J. Wright & Associates, Inc. PO Box 92668 700 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 170 Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-481-8200 Phone: 817-424-3664 Fax: 817-329-7497 Attn: Michael H. Lease Fax: 817-329-0093 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/16/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT MARK A. JOHNSON AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y See Comment No.2 Lighting Y Exterior lighting shall comply with Lighting Ordinance No.693-B 1. Dumpsters are required for all commercial properties. Show the location of a trash dumpster noting the type and height of screening device, or provide a written agreement with an adjacent property owner allowing access to a dumpster. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 7/6/00: Allow as shown) 2. The driveway does not provide 28' of stacking depth that is required when there are 20 or more parking spaces. Fewer than 20 parking spaces allows a 10' stacking depth. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 7/6/00:Allow as shown) P&ZAction: Approved(7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 29, 2000, with the variances as noted above. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-066 7S Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas * Comments from the Public Works Department Review dated June 20, 2000 must be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV12000\00-066SP2.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-066 7S Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas Case No. ZA 00-066 Review No. 1 Dated: 6/20/00 Number of Pages: _ 1 Project Name: Lot 6,Block 6 Southridge Lakes,Ph. C-1,Chamber of Commerce -- Site Plan Contact: Angela Turner,Graduate Engineer Phone: (817)481-5581x775 Fax: (817)488-9370 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 6/16/00. Comments designated with a(#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact The department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Service taps for water and sewer are not existing, they must be installed with this project. Coordinate with Public Works on the location for the proposed water taps and meters. EASEMENTS: 1. Show a 10' utility easement adjacent to the 3' utility easement along the west property line. * The proposed concrete pavement encroaches into the existing 10' utility easement. WATER COMMENTS: 1. Show and label the proposed service connection, domestic and irrigation meter. 2. The labels shown on Corporate Drive as existing water and sewer should be labeled as existing water only. Label the size of the water line. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Show and label the proposed service connection. 2. The label shown for the existing water and sanitary sewer on the west property line should read existing sanitary sewer only. Label the size of the sanitary sewer. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * A complete revised preliminary water, sewer and drainage plan must be submitted with a final plat on any portion of this property. A developer agreement is required and shall be approved by City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be approved by Public Works. #=Denotes comment that may be included in formal review by P&Z and City Council *=Denotes informational comment. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW Case No. Agenda Item Attachme t D ZA00-066 7S Pa,e 3 r• City of Southlake, Texas 1 STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA00-025 PROJECT: Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner REQUEST: On behalf of Drews Realty Group, Mike F. Twichell, L.P is requesting a site plan approval. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider site plan request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) 11"x 17" Plans (for Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-025 7T BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Drews Realty Group APPLICANT: Mike F. Twichell, L.P PROPERTY SITUATION: Application for site plan approval of a one story, 7,145 square foot retail building on 1.099 acres zoned C-2 and located at the southwest intersection of Davis Boulevard and Southlake Boulevard. HISTORY: C-2 zoning was placed on the property on September 19, 1989. The lot was created with a plat revision approved on July 5, 1994. A concept plan for this site was approved on September 3, 1996. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas,according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3195, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 1.099 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District NOTICES: Twelve (12) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area 2 Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: July 6, 2000; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, including the 8' sidewalk requirement. STAFF COMMENTS: This Site Plan substantially conforms with the approved Concept Plan. No variances are being requested. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEM0\2000cases\00-025SPl.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-025 7T Page 1 I. f Vicinity Map Lot 5R4-R2, Parker's Corner moffirip li iiiiird. h-c, -.. ,„. 4 %Sir P.4.14).• rem , ./.31krePort. 04,"_.. Vitik04174 !! IIIIi 70 iiUiL!i 4! CIMi !: IRi fli1I1U11111 EN itIØiai . 11111119r ■ iii .. ,„ .IP e, bc PI moormlippeo - iik ' ....A Ell wows ws di 11111.1111 IMMIIIIIIIIWO./Or 11.1 . di*I.!! too:vire vrai � �I(ta�Ia....m.■■■■p.■111:�+i�ii���i`�i�i, ;71 1 III 1111.MLII SitilliPette liar 111 i I 1 '00 rod I. argramiTif2p ;:l II IA Imm• r. Mf IIIIisot.iiii% mu wimp iv FA■ui�■■■1,0II1 kIJI Za 117 .1 1.-.-:-i-:i 1 ..1,1 UN N GH " . , . lNI TR,rINNA.I r I. r. •h ia .:Nas g-ir Nom figs r 2000 0 2000 Feet N \l‘....W 71 � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA 00-025 7T Page 1 1 N n carts 4109. FIE DATA F1MMY CHART SW-re ill ill p _ 21210.a s ow01401`n nal,,°t0On0^.s•01Os OENF AL NOTE rCN.tsa COME 1 - 10 s n O.w.n WO.snu.w sos...x mew w nAs.....am ,..�.•v...s '�••'mO"•u LUD-FETAL oo6�. .. LAVOOl • N. urre esi worm Coot moo mvma 2 -�Mal `c rV, ..rw .•.••x.m E .'Oa.SR11 rM ra-mot nu..ova,we ro•ae�(nr wM14o•l0� A. a mum. •- 70 MI PI am MOM. MIA!ura a u - o�ul�•a 'r..s n s nw 50.FT .r. I �•1_..m gurw MI.. ro / I WO•Ell COW nl�soeaw.wwr i'iro •n P11 14 • wai jai ar�m°ia••m��wa•a �m..� .�o-ncix �.. % Ci,� i UM-¢•r mr FETAL FIE 7AdU710!- "OM/, C1X i F3AL .r.•i.mo- a9a.rts a 127.22 ..rums•N•m N•MOY••,••.a••...W.A.u. / /' -...,-.:. __—'--- --" 003 warms'sa•.•• Am. �••..o. ` , IP ,✓s. °. x .....l1. ,..• I go..e.v. .'i's-• r• aaamQ ® a ®. • / / ' or:" \ I WE LEGEND ..1•...mROOS e�m.w0uae PM r '• i u fr » / y .�,��. \ / ' I ax SYNC.rwares Qamr.•nos •�+w�.�n oai v. .cal m••n 111"' /-' 1.4\ 17711/ ` I u. t..LOOM mr ❑aHn.s ru'i•rt9.xr a•Y.•.,a our m % #./, 162 WI MN .�� 'ZIP. ay ® •:.� r \:\: CrQ i .-7" ', /-..▪ '. &•., /,,-‘ \ 1. 1 -qr.° a i t ; I DREWS �%., VW � : I REALTY O. 4". `' • '�' S' a s. ::..... • \ :.�n.o 0 GROUP /� 1�r��ve, ' L F dR' _ .APX • SUITE•MO ro 'e•• �,,+ '' 1� u* 'ip �o" aaa un Oour awnuKE TEx.�v 7aarwo 2 4l' • / VAC I A^..s. MOP C-a �^,�,S�.I . • �r `` 1..., r".�. f` Y ,. +I I PARKERS :'NY• •�, 1�� ��> 3 j CORNER /( s.. u.. '�, 1 / ' �� ..r ass h'i1 ■ k I / "��YY - /• " LLB.... I ' 7 w73n•-m i •,,,• ,' tt1M.--\-. ', \ G1 193s SITE APPROVAL. _ 1r 0AH5'BD PLAN NF!•tlV JESSIE C. A L L E N SURVEY — ABSTRACT No. 18 1 M —— — SCALE. 1-. .D' SITE PACKAGE AD REC'D JUN 19 2000 SPUN b E AD 0 as eD „NE . n w City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-025 Review No: Four Date of Review: 07/12/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Parker's Corner, Lots 5R4-R2 , Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract 18 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Mike F. Twichell, L. P. 3624 Oak Lawn Avenue., Suite 320 Dallas, TX. 75219 Phone: (214) 521-3066 Phone: Fax: (214) 599-0583 Attn: Terry Clark Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/19/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT MARK JOHNSON AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency N Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y As Approved with Concept Plan Interior Landscape y Complies Driveways Y Complies P&ZAction: Approved(7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 29, 2000, including the 8'sidewalk requirement. * The Davis Boulevard sidewalk is part of the City's Trail System Master Plan. The applicant shall confirm the routing of the sidewalk with Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent, prior to issuance of a building permit. * The provided north bufferyards (10'-Type 0) were included in the approval of the original concept plan. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-025 7T Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. 11111* The applicant should be aware thatprior to issuance of a buildingpermit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REWSPLAN-I.WPD • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-025 7T Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT July 14, 2000 CASE NO: ZA99-139 PROJECT: 114 Hillside Square ORDINANCE NO: 480-332 REQUEST: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd., is requesting approval of a site plan for a retail/restaurant redevelopment project and S-P-1 zoning ACTION NEEDED: Consider rezoning and site plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Public Works Memorandum (F) Articulation Review Summary (G) Tree Preservation Analysis (H) Ordinance No. 480-332 (I) Letters from Neighboring Property Owners (J) 11"x17" Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Dennis Killough(Ext. 787) Case No. Agenda Item ZA99-139 8A City of Southlake, Texas BACKGROUND INFORMATION • OWNER/APPLICANT: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. PROPERTY SITUATION: This is an existing retail strip center west of Shady Lane at S.H. 114. The property is currently zoned C-3, and bounded by C-3 properties to the east and west. The property to the north is developed with single family residences, zoned SF-IA. The owner is proposing to give the center a "face-lift" while adding approximately 4,000 square feet. The southern most driveway on Shady Lane and the driveway on S. H. 114 are existing. HISTORY: This site has been in existence for several years. The following is a brief history: • SUP(ZA84-029) renewal of permit for the sale of off premises packaged beer was denied in June, 1984 (records indicate the zoning was Light Commercial) • SUP (ZA86-050) for the sale of off premises packaged beer was approved in September, 1986, under new ownership (records indicate the zoning was Heavy Commercial) • C-3 zoning placed on the property in September of 1989 • • Plat showing was filed in May, 2000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1B3, Samuel Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525, involving 1.4677 acres LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses NOTICES: Seven (7) notices were sent In Favor Opposed Undecided Attached Letters with Comments Within 200 Notification Area 1 1 Outside 200 Notification area P&Z ACTION: March 9, 2000; Denied (5-0). • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA99-139 8A Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas „ STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated July 14, 2000. The following is a summary of the variances the applicant is seeking: • Alternate bufferyard locations, widths and number plantings • Allowing parking spaces in the bufferyard • Reduced interior landscape area and plantings • Allowing reductions in the driveway spacing and stacking requirements • Allowing a commercial driveway on Shady Lane (residential street) • Reduced building line setback on Shady Lane • Increased Impervious Coverage from 75% to 80% • Allowing exceptions to the articulation requirements • Placing the dumpster too close to residential property The issues raised at P&Z included drainage concerns from neighboring property owners, multiple variances, and tree issues, noted in the Landscape Administrator's review. Following the P&Z meeting, the applicant obtained a Professional Engineer to evaluate the drainage and grading of the site, please see memorandum from Charlie Thomas, City Engineer. This plan was revised from that submitted to the Commission by reducing the amount of square feet, increasing the bufferyards and reducing the parking. The applicant is seeking S-P-1 zoning due to the unique conditions of the property. The applicant also provided a list of uses which may be eliminated from the allowed"C-3"uses. Please see the list provided with the site plan submittal in Attachment C. Due to the recommendation for denial, by P&Z, a super majority vote of approval is needed. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-139ZSnew.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA99-139 8A Page 2 , Vicinity Map 114 Hillside Square smiim k I I l HIG MI ■it . IR%■a ...1.. °Mir rw ...,.... .. . mt. 1M112PCMIL Mb-' , -Itial ���NM h ,~1 hilt`•. CREST - 41-1IL! !1t1IIAt e-Al iitmoi, . .. mpla... III MIME .4 Pk- ■ new :_ril MallreLW ;Milk 1 -Aill mi I - es.''Airefri * pie". um , ,,,c 0 Mil lipV;alimpunink, Mimi -co 01,, II q) iiimmilrinkil :..- A lop _iik_ 44,.. . - 4,,,orgrrirm ni -. - -.41111,-.111 _ eH ■ ,.1� :Alt woe- 31.:6-rwl REST � s?o"� k.c � . IZIMII a Arai � ■V- ■VIZca nl Os _ �h .K 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ /- W / � E S Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA99-139 8A Page 1 • [__` a r.in M SUMMARY Pro .. .....>PI/CS Uwe [rst. Pr° . ..............._..............__.-..........Retail Caotmwetalw Of PaeeOi Y. eyt. F . A. 0 A 5f.rpCZI:tru 'at. ..._.......aR g . F 1 e� . •QLa Pinola C•nau _ r1_ nTA. Proposed h.ild.*Araa gGl'''' M9lan7.".::::.`- - :.. D LSO._ 14 )....Y.t• : Ra+Imuar I.orHd�n�IHIa!l.:.._.__.._..._.....,'J•-Y � w• .et.a.....�.� Propose.Row w......_:..-__:.._........11200 al.>f.f.Y.&SOO 11 404aunM '-C 1 IA Required PvW4.....-.-._�._._.-......_in 7!• 2 Provided_..__..Sl.MarL.. .. _at a'• 9. I n.�. p r' „a,R p Total ._ • -a. 3.6" ..t J N BTID'27 6 _ Provored R OnS id otd TL hRT An Swit•YL 0.«r atT IN SonlNaYe Stenderda And NEP Coda, I I� �,�� /'� -{ 1`,���4 �`�.�� ill i,-� .,• r 1' NOV BENCli$41 Mr OF SOMA. 1-1041-1414 ••••• I I I I I I I I I '" I I ...... I I I I I•• I L= 1 O.11111tr" C2IM "•iil 11111111111.11 ..... I I I I 1J I 1. 1 1J_I_LL1 — . MA �E'�o� 1♦ �_ 01200 m�MAIM M•MOW/Its Y. } Ir_�raaaooc-T��� /f��:}!• '"' I I I"t•°•I I I I I I I'' . �' ars..r,.an t. r fir+: t • .w 'I I I 'I'�' I I �•i�. 9 I ,,.ud.,..,._�vu W o rIt`•'=-Z. LI ar....W -� r-.y. 0:4,!: is•= I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 a;n�o amp., e�;y"Y,�sw Md'.'4eyi"r'"".....:t +` ..r , �- I i I I I i I I : I.t'�1 I ' PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 0 •a: . hW. Y - OR r•. r , ,ov,r -v"---_-.-.y ,, Rol. . Q ' '6 rn n•M - L.,r ,.."n'.... n/ sir.. 111,1 se'a-- — •... 41 '] Li s '1 o o AMP Aar. u OW Ins SE k•SP • l.aw c Et v M I: •i • 0 till Mr STO - a.SUITa. -.$ o a R :' ; 1 1 I v mini ieD WI Ii ;11 ,.ILIIrt:w-e.A.,e \ e• I N 'Th nanP 1.� ' /— I-- b4tiaii lenn i ' ' C: I m.. c::ns; — I'-i--1J—I I �C� A I I I I"t"—t" I : I I 1 iI II I1 P:. 1 LEGEND 4~ �.NRt>•lf Ms on -- 1 / BUfTiR GHOHCAPN'G I ,iv' —_.' Op.= N m ao.Sr nmr 1 -14 ��::•lat:soi INTERIOR LANDSCAPIitgNG ........4..•.::• a •• I I I I'••h�I I I I F ...I.PT eror.'.l a -)ss 4:4`WIZ..J%/r r/ r i s-Alm ���`tat AY o It W-—4f1 I I rirn��r� o : ' 'by L •2ZT.42' .gym-• n•aDMt... ��nl 1 wunm WI'1«n< n . r �O2ara_aa-- r�.........�..� 1 ,\ IF�F,,.'' se.N.R 4 B E. STATE HIGHWAY•,NO. 114 �001 as I. a�l ---, • — o w AYE.sea `.te, °.r — DrIER' %or. — 0.4 - - Mn'John TdlmaMel.Engineer in har a ar the p.r WIfT POLE D4GRAY YA715E REALTY COMPANY IIa Hiesire)Fipnsw.and ar sin Jmberly AT IIMT/l PSMWYtTY YNB P.D. BOX 122.E .rtA tW RISAi.-W►•).L•ee Loth eonhrmM 1 �A—g —-- DAL(AS, TUGS 7D225 Chet. JUL` 2 if'l(/� n ILL CM nuts ''B" A"US (214)989-8501 1.Na part r the rater.asw property abang rm.r rqIna •rn wren rw lha HYn.a)Expansion. L.�.y • MAlar RaSUMSw 2 The canto,Net-or-..r remain the sears ZAN9-I:IY SHEET V E , H l J V t'✓.''iVLI�T/vF TO ''C•3 ~ast5 SECTION 20 C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 20.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - This district is a lower intensity commercial category providing a uniform set of standards for neighborhood type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended that this zoning district be served by appropriate thoroughfares and be of such size that all parking and traffic maneuvering can take place on the commercial site. It is intended to provide neighborhood residential areas generally within one-quarter mile to one-half mile radius with limited, convenience services and small retail type items. It is intended that the development within a district or tract be established as a unit, with adequate off-street parking for customers and employees, with coordinated architecture, with coordinated signage and lighting specifically adapted to achieve compatibility with surrounding development and with appropriate landscaping and screening to reduce or eliminate any negative impacts on adjacent land uses. 20.2 PERMITTED USES a. Commercial Uses 1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including fabrication, manufacture, or production of goods. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) 2. Bakeries, provided that the floor area of the bakery operation shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. 3. Barber and beauty shops. 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats, provided that the floor area of the business does not exceed 2,500 square feet. 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate-in conjunction with small convenience e overhaul, (Deleted by Ordinance No. 480-Z.) 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets provided that the floor area of the business activity shall not exceed 3,000 square feet. 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores provided that the floor area does not exceed 2,500 square feet of space. 8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or "take-out" food establishments, provided that the floor area of such operation does not exceed 2,000 square feet. Food Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page 20-1 RED J A N 2 4 2000 service establishments operating in this district are envisioned to be relatively small operations designed at providing neighborhood support, such as delicatessens and limited menu item establishments that generate low to moderate traffic from outside the neighborhood area. 9. Tailor,clothing or wearing apparel repair shops to include tailor activities that create custom made clothing or accessories. b. Community Facility Uses - City hall, fire and police stations and other municipal uses. 20.3 ACCESSORY USES - In addition to those accessory uses specifically authorized in Section 34 of this ordinance, any use may be established as an accessory use to a permitted use when it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. 20.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) 20.5 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - In this district,the following development regulations shall be applicable: a. Height: No building or structure shall exceed two and one-half(2-1/2) stories, nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet. b. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. c. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet; provided, however, where a C-1 zoned lot abuts on the side of property zoned as single family residential, each portion of a building in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height shall be set back one (1) additional foot for each additional one (1) foot in height. Zero lot line development may be permitted on a common interior lot line where construction of a party wall is used and when approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Where zero lot development is utilized, the equivalent open space and plantings(normally provided in adjoining bufferyards along the common lot line) shall be provided elsewhere within the two developing lots. A concept plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance is required to be submitted with a request for zero lot line development. Approval shall be based upon an analysis of the location, the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page 20-2 • 1 SECTION 21 C-2 LQCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRT,CT 21.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT-This district is a low to medium intensity commercial category providing a uniform set of standards for neighborhood type retail shopping facilities and general commercial activities. It is intended that this zoning district be served by appropriate thoroughfares and be of such size that all parking and traffic maneuvering can take place on the commercial site. It is intended to provide limited local retail and service commercial uses which serve one or more neighborhoods lying within a one and one-half to two mile radius of the site. 21.2 PEIR,MITTED USES (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-U.) 1, Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District. 2, Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. 3. Antique shops. 4. Bakeries designed for retail sales rather than wholesale operation. 5. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops. 6. Blueprinting or photostatingi• 7. Book or stationery stores tb include large newsstands. , 113 • 1_ 1'1 F l 1 .1 r(eutfleer-display perms terll • 7C"CTC. J� � r i t -- 10. Cigar or tobacco store& 11. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats,providing that the floor area does not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet for separate or combined uses. • 12. Confectionery stores. 13. Custom dress making or millinery shops. • • Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 821-1 , - RE J'N 2 4 2000 Page .� r . • -"' ] `? Y�` 'ay.' 4 i 14. Dancing schools. `it-' i LXY 15. Day nurseries- ry r 16. Dolicatessen shops without size limitations. 41.4 17. Dog and cat hospitals or small-animal hospitals if-cendu oviding that :, _ eep ram.:: t K I at any time. . 18. Drug stores. 19. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceedcy eight thousand (8,000) square feet. .` ' 20. Duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing find offset printing, providingthat the floor area does not exceed two thousand (2,000) p g, square feet. - , t . •• I - 1t . (Deleted by Ordinance No. 480-Z.) 22. Financial institutions. 23. Florist or gift shops. • -- I .. 4: • J except cutting or~\Tapping. x 25. Grocery stores and meat markets without size limitations. - 26. H irs..L vice fmilities to iaeltzcic-elinie3-, o€frces•of dentists, deotsrs, and other , M State of Texas; physical, audie and spceel- therapy, P��` and psycholegical testing and •r• c ; Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C t ZA 99-139 -2 Page for- the•sale-and re to and medical supplies anra enuipme t 27. Jewelry stores. ' 28, Leather and leather good shops, providing that the floor area does not exceed two . thousand (2,000) square feet for separate or combined uses. f 29. Optical goods. 1 30. Photographs, portrait or camera shops and photofinishing. , 31. Radio and television sales and servicing, 32. Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and "take-out" food restaurants. I • 33. Shoe repair services. . . 1 34. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair. 35. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel shops without size restriction. 36. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales,provided that such activities occur entirely within the confines of the business structure itself. I. r • 37. Variety stores, provided that the floor area of such facility does not exceed ten thousand(10,000) square feet. 21.3 ACCESSORY USES -In addition to those accessory uses specifically authorized in Section 34 of this ordinance, any use may be established as an accessory use to a permitted use when it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. Lii 21.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically 1. authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full,and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be 11 permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) 21.5 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - In this district,the following development regulations shall be applicable: I . .. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 y $�A 3 , ; Page lo SECTION 22 C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 22.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT -This is a general commercial zoning district normally reserved for areas that provide the greatest number and mix of retail and commercial uses. This district is reserved for areas of adequate size and location so that its broad range of medium to higher intensity land uses will not cause or create nuisances to adjoining zoning districts. It is not anticipated that this district will be placed contiguous to or in direct proximity to residential zoning districts. This zoning district is designed and intended to serve as the commercial support zone of the entire community. It is not based on a service area directed only at immediately surrounding properties. This commercial zoning classification is the most comparable to that traditionally found in central business districts of older communities and is intended to have a clearly commercial pattern. It should be located in,such a manner as to have reasonable access to major arterial roadway systems so that ingress and egress to the C-3 area may be managed in a safe and controlled manner. 22.2 PERMITTED USES 1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District. 2. A.uditoriums, theaters and cinemas. 3. Cleaning,dying and pressing works; laundry and washaterias,providing that the floor area does not exceed 3,500 square feet for separate or combined uses. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-U.) 4. Coin and stamp shops. f. CV11ll11LLL 1CiT.�I2[1��.mciSc�.�'tl�l.1S 1 D 7 D golf courses. 6. Commercial art galleries. 7. Conventional golf courses, in • g ' ex-eluding outdoor miniature gelf-eourjea. 8. Department stores. 9. Dry goods and notion stores without size limitation. 10. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and Case No. installation services. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page '1 22-1 REC1) Jim C 4 2000 11. Hardware,paint,wallpaper stores and other home improvement items and activities. 12. Hat shops. 13. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums. 14. Hobby shops. 15. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances. Lodges, 3oreFities and/or fraternities ,. o facilities title 3ep'perrive retail and personal service us ate `y or-u de ce al fly for the convenienatientsr staff and . ters I& Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers. 19. Music or record shops. 20. Nursery buildings for the retail sale of plants and accessory items where the sales operations are conducted entirely within an enclosed structure. Outdoor storage or sale shall be permitted with this use to the extent that the outdoor sales area is completely enclosed by a fence, wall or screening device. 21. Pet shops. 22. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies. 23. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services. All storage of materials must be indoors within this zoning district. 24. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs without size limitation. 25. Retail stores, businesses or shops for custom work or the manufacturing of articles to be sold at retail on the premises, providing that in such manufacture, the total mechanical power shall not exceed five horsepower for the operation of any one machine and provided that the space occupied by the manufacturing use permitted herein shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the total floor area of the permitted use and provided further that such manufacturing use is not noxious or offensive by reason of vibration, noise, odor, dust, smoke or fumes, and all activity shall be conducted totally within the same building. It is the intent of this provision that the manufacturing activity be related to the production of small items in a craft-type environment rather than high intensity construction activities. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page 22-2 Skating risks, ice and _ol c_ (indoor only) 27. Taverns, clubs, and other comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of this ordinance. The mere reference to this provision within the zoning ordinance does not indicate or imply that the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages has been or will be permitted under the alcoholic beverage laws of the State of Texas. It is only intended to define a location for this type of use if its existence should be permitted by state law. 28. Toy stores. 29. Upholstery shops - furniture. 30. Variety stores without size limitation. 22.3 ACCESSORY USES - In addition to those accessory uses specifically authorized in Section 34 of this ordinance, any use may be established as an accessory use to a permitted use when it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. 22.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following. a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) 22.5 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - In this district, the following development regulations shall be applicable: a. Height: No building or structure shall exceed three (3) stories nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height. b. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. c. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet; provided, however, where a C-3 zoned lot abuts on the side of property zoned as single family residential, each portion of a building in excess of fifteen(15) feet in height shall be set back one (1) additional foot for each additional one (1) foot in height. Zero lot line development may be permitted on a common interior lot line where construction of a party wall is used and when approved by the City Council after a Case No. recommendation by the 1)1witaidtg mid Zoning Commission. Where zzil4aA6ent C ZA 99-139 8A Page q 22-3 development is utilized, the equivalent open space and plantings (normally provided in adjoining bufferyards along the common lot line) shall be provided elsewhere within the two developing lots. A concept plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance is required to be submitted with a request for zero lot line development. Approval shall be based upon an analysis of the location, the configuration, and the impact and compatibility of the construction with adjacent land uses. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-U.) d. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than ten (10) feet except where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall ha ve ave a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty(50)percent of the lot area. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-BB). f. Floor Area: Each store, shop or business shall have a minimum of five hundred(500) square feet of floor area, but the minimum size for a separate building or structure existing within this district shall be two thousand (2,000) square feet. There is no maximum floor space, except as specified herein under other provisions of this , ordinance. g• All commercial uses within this district shall be sales and/or service type uses selling , new merchandise only. h. All business shall be conducted entirely within a building. Outside storage and/or I display of any type shall be prohibited unless in accordance with Section 38 of this ordinance. All exterior lighting designed for security, illumination, parking lot illumination or advertising and which is placed within this zoning district shall meet the 111 requirements of the current lighting ordinance, as amended. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-GG.) j. Outdoor storage of trash receptacles shall be at the side or rear of the site and shall be totally encircled or screened by fence, planting or other suitable visual barrier. k. Off-street vehicle parking spaces may be located within the required front yard of any retail, office or industrial district; however, such off-street parking spaces shall be on a hard surfaced drive or parking area. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed seventy-five (75%) percent of the total lot area. However, if the following • criteria is met, up to, but not exceeding, an additional 5% o_ t impervious coverage Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page IQ 22-4 • • fir shall be permitted. for each additional one percent (1%) of impervious coverage r provided, an additional two feet f2') of width of the required bufferyard(s) adjacent to any street(s) and an additional 1 foot of width to the required side and rear bufferyards shall be added to the site. This regvirememay also be satisfied by providing an equivalent amount of lam area in the tLnt or sides of the site(exclusive of the bufferyard areas) either by increasing the number and/or size of parking islands, oy preserving natural groves of trees,by enhancingrrcLural drainage area,etc. Any alternative means shall be required to have the approval of the Landscape Administrator to ensure that the proposal is practical and will enhance the survivability of existing trees on the site. (As amended by Ordinance.No. 480-BB). 22.6 ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS OR USES LYING WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FEET (400') OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY- In addition to the development regulations applicable to this zoning district, • the development regulations in Section 43, Part III, Residential Adjacency Standards, shall also apply. When any requirements in this section are in conflict with any other requirements • for this zoning district, the more stringent requirements shall apply. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-CC). 22.7 SITE PLAN - A site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the C-3 district. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-M.) 22.8 SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES - Special exception uses may be approved by the Board of Adjustment as specifically authorized in Section 44 of this ordinance subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 44, together with any other conditions as the Board of Adjustment may impose. Any use accessory to an approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-M.) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA 99-139 8A Page II 22-5 . . • 3 • SECTION 18 • 0-1 OFFICE?DISTRICT 3 . 18.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT-This district is a commercial category designed and intended for the exclusive use of office and office related activities. It is established for and will be allocated to those districts capable of supporting commercial activity of an office character.• It is envisioned as possessing a lower overall intensity of use and development when Ia compared to other commercial'categories. It is particularly well-suited for environmentally 0 sensitive areas and those sites in which natural limitations make full area utilization infeasible, It has been established to encourage and permit general professional and business ri offices of high site quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped surroundings with the types of uses, and design exterior appearance so controlled as to be generally compatible �,. with existing and future adjacent and surrounding residential development. This district ' should generally be located in areas abutting arterial and/or collector streets which are, because of location and development trends,suitable for the establishment of office uses that • are 'compatible with residential uses thereby Ynaintaining'the character and"uitegrity of existing and developing neighborhoods. This district is also ideally located in transitional • areas between commercial and residential development which is adaptable to occupancy by certain office uses. The ultimate development within this zoning category must provide a low intensity of land usage and site coverage to enable the site to retain its park-like image. rU 18.2 PERMITTED USES a. Office Uses '"'.' 1. Accounting and tax preparation; •.,• 2. Adjustment and collection services; T •, '• 3. Advertising agencies; ' J,F'�'"' ' , 4, Architecture; . . • 5. Banking; ': •.: b. Billpaying services; lM- A; , .•.:: :: '2 447 7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only); i'°+ '.. ;*:7".;:..'. 8. Business holding and investment services; . `'•-•: 9. Chamber of Commerce;. • '!.1.,..,,,-:::...-.. ,-`•,••Rio• . Agenda Item Attachment C K :i'',99-139 8A8-1 Page IZ • '• •. p. r v 10. Chiropractors; • ;�. • 11. Computer services; to. . 12. Consumer and ; l o outside storage or display-isRemitted); 14. Dentists; 4 ;i. 15. Duplication and mailing services; `• 0 Gvq 16, Employment services; . ,,,•,,- it • � 17. Engineering; . :3.... . 18, Finance; .:' 19. Interior design; ► � e 20. Land purveying; l.' • 21. Law; 22. Management consultants; • ,,44 ar 23. Optometrists; .. 24. • .Other offices of a business'and/or professional nature providing services not. . - :;a including the retail sale, fabrication, manufacture or production of goods or '';' merchandise. 25. Physicians; `' 26. Podiatrists; , 27. Psychiatrists; 28. Psychologists; 29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios; 30. Real estate and insurance; ": Case No. • Agenda Item • Attachment C •fr '1•- ZA 99-139 8A18-2 Page 1:3 : - 'n 31. Savings and Loan; 32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices; 33. Stenographic services; 34. Title companies; 35. Travel bureaus or services; 36. Utility offices; 44:ram,: °,. b. Community Facility Uses • ~:r 1, Public, cami public and private parka; R� S� . • 2. Recreation and open space to include playgrovark. par ys, 4 34� ectuestFian bridal trallsr , 11fe sanctuaries; 3. Libraries; City 1, it R a�liee ns—, �ottYermt G ; and whl.� ' pry••• 5. Other uses of a similar ncture and character. ' Y 18.3 ACCESSORY USES -In addition to those accessory uses specifically authorized in Section • •°s= 34 of this ordinance,any use may be established as an accessory use to apernutted use when y�J it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. 18.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council . .•_ following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance,subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance.No. 480-C.) • ;.. • 18.5 DEVELOPMENT REQULATIONS-In this district,the following development regulations g shall be applicable: • :rxw ; • ase No. Agenda Item Attachment C tifix• ZA 99-139 8A18-3 : �• Page 14 • City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 99-139 Review No: Five Date of Review: 07/14/00 Project Name: Site Plan— 114 Hillside Square APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. D.E. Ritter Architects P.O. Box 12248 14465 Webb Chapel, Suite 219 Dallas,TX 75225 Dallas,TX 75234 Phone: (214) 363-8504 Phone: (972) 243-8500 Fax: (214) 351-5257 Attn: Dan Matise Fax: (972)243-2326 Attn. D.Ritter CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/12/2000 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. . s 3.•, a . Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 5 Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 6 Building Articulation Y See Comments No. 5 Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y See Comment No.4 Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 1 Interior Landscape Y See Comment No. 1 Driveways Y See Comments No. 2 Lighting Y Note on plan indicates compliance. 1. The following changes are needed regarding landscaping and bufferyards: a. Bufferyards shall be located within and along the outer perimeter of a lot or boundary line. This plan proposes no bufferyard along the east property line and variable width bufferyard along the south property line. (Variance Requested) b. Relocate parking spaces outside of the bufferyards. In no event shall the following uses be permitted in a bufferyard: parking facilities, or trash dumpsters. There is existing parking spaces located in the south bufferyard along S.H. 114.(Variance Requested) b. Provide the minimum 7,350 square feet of interior landscaping. This plan proposes 5,560 square feet of interior landscaping, a deficiency of 1,790 square feet. (Variance Requested) d. Provide the minimum number of plantings in the required bufferyards. This plan proposes some reductions as noted in the charts. (Variance Requested) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 99-139 8A Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas 2. The following changes are needed regarding driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. Section 5.2.c of Driveway Ordinance No. 634 prohibits commercial, multi-family and service driveways on collector or local streets unless the tract or lot has no other public access. This plan shows a driveway on S.H. 114 and two additional commercial driveways on Shady Lane, which is a local street. (Variance Requested) b. Provide the minimum 100' distance between the southernmost driveway on Shady Lane and S.H. 114. This plan shows a distance of approximately 57 feet. (Variance Requested) c. Provide the minimum 100' distance between driveways on Shady Lane. This plan proposes a driveway that is 61 feet from an existing driveway, north of this site. (Variance Requested) d. Provide the minimum stacking depth of 50' for all drives within this development. This plan shows approximately 24', 8', and 2' of stacking. (Variance Requested) 3. Provide a minimum 30' building setback adjacent to Shady Lane. This plan proposes a 5' building line. (Variance Requested) 4. Provide a maximum of 75% of impervious coverage. The proposed site appears to exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 75% for the "C-3" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage of this is approximately 80%. (Variance Requested) 5. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance is as shown on the attached charts. (Variance Requested) 6. No dumpster shall be located within 50' of residential property. This dumpster is approximately 42' from the residential property to the north. Relocate the dumpster. (Variance Requested) P&Z Action: Denied(5-0) on March 9, 2000 * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 99-139 8A Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Dan Matise, 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\99\99139SP4.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 99-139 8A Page 3 MEMORANDUM Jul 12, 2000 To: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Hillside Square, ZA 99-139 I have received a drainage study from Paul Lipscomb, PE regarding the 114 Kimball Square(Hillside Square). The study shows that the roadside ditch along the west side of Shady Lane is of sufficient size to handle the stormwater run off from the proposed reconstruction of the site at the northwest corner of SH 114 and Shady Lane. The existing roadside ditch is capable of handling the runn off from this site because Tx DOT is collecting the stormwater from SH 114, that used to flow down Shady Lane, in the roadway improvements that are being done to SH 114 at this time. If you have questions, call me at extension 814. Charlie J. Thomas City Engineer Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA99-139 8A Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 99-139 Review No. Five Date of Review: 07/06/00 Project Name: Site Plan — 114 Hillside Square Received: 7/12/2000 North Elevation Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 51 201 294% No 51 50 -2% Yes Min. artic. Offset 3 0 -100% No 3 ? -33% No Min. artic. Length 13 206 1485 Yes 13 -,5 92% Yes South Elevation Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 51 201 294% No 51 51 0% Yes Min. artic. Offset 3 0 -100% No 3 6 100% Yes Min. artic. Length 13 206 1485% Yes 13 26 100% Yes East Elevation Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Pro\ ided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 5 I 56 10% No 51 37 -27% Yes Min. artic. Offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. Length 13 23 77% Yes 9 16 78% Yes West Elevation Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 51 56 10% No 51 37 -27% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 13 23 77% Yes 9 16 78% Yes Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA 99-139 8A Page 1 TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 99-139 Date of Review: 2 —22 - 00 Number of Pages: 3 Project Name: 114 Kimball Square Retail Center(Site Plan) OWNER: PREPARED BY: Dan Matise Paul A. Lipscomb P.O. Box 12248 2407 North Graham Drive Dallas, TX 75225 Arlington, TX 76013-1360 Phone: (214) 362-8504 Phone: (817) 543-0268 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Within the existing area of the North boundary line and bufferyard of the property there were thirty-six (36) trees removed. The total diameter inches of the trees removed equals to 456" diameter inches. Three hundred seventy (370) inches of the trees removed were of Quality and Protected trees as designated in the Tree Preservation Ordinance. They were primarily made up of American Elm, Hackberry, Pecan and Post Oak. All that is existing at this time are stumps at ground level. The trees were removed without a Tree Removal Permit. 2. A large majority of the trees removed would have been in the area of the required North 10'- F1 bufferyard and the applicant would have been able to take existing tree credits for required landscaping within the bufferyard. The trees also provided an effective screen between the applicant's property, Highway 114 and the existing resident's homes. 3. The regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A, prohibits the clear cutting of land. Furthermore, non-residential developments are restricted from the removal of trees not within public R.O.W., public utility or drainage easements as shown on a Final Plat, Fire Lanes, required parking areas and within six feet (6') of the building foundation as shown on an approved Site Plan; without a Tree Removal Permit. 4. There are still existing trees along the West property line and West bufferyard area. If the trees are preserved in accordance with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and are in healthy and desirable condition; they may be used for existing tree credits in the required West bufferyard. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA99-139 8A Page 1 5. Any person, firm, corporation, agent or employee thereof who violates the provisions of Article Three (Tree Removal Permit Required) of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction hereof shall be fined One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per diameter inch of the tree(s) removed or damaged. 6. TREE REPLACEMENT: If a person removes a protected tree, the person shall be required to replace the protected tree being removed with a quality tree or canopy tree as recommended in the Landscape Ordinance and approved by the Landscape Administrator. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal or exceed, in caliper, the diameter (at 4.5' above ground level) of each tree removed. This mitigative measure is not meant to supplant good site planning. Tree replacement will be considered only after all design alternatives which could save more existing trees have been evaluated and reasonably rejected. Replacement trees shall be a minimum of 3" caliper(at 1' above ground) and seven feet (7') in height when planted. REPLACEMENT PROCEDURES: At the time of review, the agent responsible for replacement, the time of replacement and the location of the new trees will be determined by the Landscape Administrator. The replacement trees shall be located on the subject site whenever possible. If this is not feasible, the Landscape Administrator has the authority to allow the planting to take place on another property, including public property. REFORESTATION FUND: If required by the Landscape Administrator, the applicant, instead of compliance with Section 9.2 hereof, shall make a payment into the Reforestation Fund or other specifically dedicated fund. The funds shall be used only for purchasing and planting trees on public property or acquiring wooded property which shall remain in a naturalistic state in perpetuity. BUILDING INSPECTIONS Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA99-139 8A Page 2 # Species Diameter Comments 1 American Elm* 15" 2 American Elm* 30" 3 Hackberry 10" 4 American Elm* 8" 5 American Elm* 7" 6 American Elm* 7" 7 American Elm* 13" 8 American Elm* 16" 9 Post Oak* 8" 10 Hackberry 9" 11 American Elm* 11" 12 American Elm* 50" 13 American Elm* 8" 14 Post Oak* 8" 15 Hackberry 10" Clump 16 American Elm* 9" 17 American Elm* 12" 18 American Elm* 14" 19 Post Oak* 9" 20 Post Oak* 11" 21 Hackberry 7" 22 American Elm* 10" 23 American Elm* 16" 24 American Elm* 15" 25 American Elm* 7" 26 American Elm* 7" 27 American Elm* 18" 28 Pecan* 8" 29 American Elm* 20" 30 American Elm* 10" 31 Hackberry 20" 32 Hackberry 17" 33 American Elm* 10" 34 Hackberry 6" 35 Hackberry 7" 36 Hackberry 13" Total: 456" *Indicates Quality or Marginal Trees:370" Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA99-139 8A Page 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-332 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1B3 SITUATED IN THE SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.4677 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "C- 3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 2 public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 3 Being Tract 1B3 situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, and being approximately 1.4677 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "C-3" General Commercial District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 4 • particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 5 until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS,Corban Capital, L.L.C., acting by and through the undersigned, Dan Matise, its duly authorized agent is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being the same tract of land conveyed to Corban Capital, L.L.C., by deed recorded in Volume 13382, Page 253, Deed Records Dallas County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of E. State Highway No. 114, (a variable width R.O.W.), with the West line of Shady Lane, (a 35' R O.W.), a power pole on corner: THENCE. Westerly, with the said North line of E. State Highway No. 114, same being with a curve to the left, having a central angle of 02 deg. 21 min. 18 sec., a radius of 5839.58 feet, a chord bearing of North 85 deg. 55 min. 34 sec. West, an arc distance of 240.01 feet to the end of said curve, an"x"cut in concrete for corner; THENCE. North 87 deg. 06 min 13 sec. West,with the said North line of E. State Highway No. 114, a distance of 34.00 feet, a brass highway monument found for corner; THENCE: North 02 deg. 15 min. 28 sec. East, with the East line of a tract of land conveyed to Leonard D. Emery, et al, by deed recorded in Volume 11585, Page 2031, Deed Records Tarrant County,Texas, a distance of 226.76 feet, a 5/8" iron rod found for corner; THENCE: North 87 deg. 19 min. 27 sec. East,with the South line of a tract of land conveyed to Raymond C. and Mary Louise Dunn, by deed recorded in Volume 2775, Page 54, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 257.65 feet to a point in the said West line of Shady Lane, a 1/2' iron rod found for corner; THENCE: South 01 deg. 34 min. 01 sec. East, with the said West line of Shady Trail, a distance of 257.47 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 63,933 square feet or 1.4677 acres of land. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 8 xCJN 5a axis •m...s•. _ _,•,,.......r,. Cd ,unu wr MaNIO 9 - -.....-...-11...„,--7,------.""16.----.7 ill.C I.4;7;4:7 7.".'----:----------Atr------ ------1'.---- I m R'- �g . "T 4 r I''IIL,II r :I., tl` 1 - ..,1lfIH/lNft�/Jj Ti�:/l....- �i�llfliiri..:L�rti a*a_ ro�.r ..,6,..,roM„I fir:. I rt I I I mt-„I 1 � 1 'r Fi? 1..w.i I I 1 ?�„� '�!/% °° iii .. :aF I j - -- • - iI S'• `?I I 1 a - I I 1 I 7F i 6, i—J...I I I I Y .. 1 '„'" u. f� a I e; \ ft h�-1 M ' ! 4,$ '.Oy 00 F+i H ti � t� I.1` I 1 ' M.9_..__._.--. ,ZP __ I it -;.. rg. .,,: 'l'—r_TT_l--r"T._.r-T-1 'S� I b.k I-T- I. ---"... r zri..:1.'�....3.a-..YY=.. . '.. i 1 1 LU i i I i .1 1 ri Li I I L11 r - - ..� Ld: '-- el s ---. :::: t I • 1 _....- ,,... __--......- INg.,.„..-...0„.„. - _ _ R ....._ T-`. _I rtp _ = _� r -- r r ,�i r r t r j.r I r E„ ra 1,"1, i '?^l l i l t l l l ea..l. 11 1 1 i 1 1 ! ::r e.,,,..., .,....,...„„. •.:•S rr. • ••Si. :11: � ' ,fir i Il•.•tr rr.•. .,- 1i1, /l�I/YN 1 e 1 ! a.a w.n.....r.,.rmmr.nfl J.r.p7 ImVP`A,ll i 1 V; MI MIMIC 1.11 UN O M zCI ie crs U N EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA99-139 8A Page 10 • Dan &Kay Absher 410 Shady Lane Southlake, Texas 76092 Planning and Zoning Commission 1721 E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 REFERENCE NO: ZA 99-139 114 KIMBALL SQUARE,LTD In regards to the above mentioned property I am not clear at this present time exactly all the variances the new owners are asking for. I do know of one I have some concerns about, along with some of my neighbors. That being the request of no Buffer Yard to the North side. It is my understanding that a BUFFER YARD is required next to residential property in the City of Southlake. I do not feel this should be allowed to be changed for this piece of property. The impact on my property along with my neighbors would be greatly affected by noise,water runoff and a unsightly view. There were some trees which the new owner has cut down "I believe unnecessarily)which if they had been left would have made a nice Buffer Yard. Instead we now have a very unsightly view of a wood fence and the noise from 114 is much more noticeable. There is no reference exactly what will be in this Shopping Center that was once named Southalake Plaza,which I assume the address was Shady Lane or 114 since it sits on the corner of Shady Lane and 114 not Kimball. The new owner for some unknown reason now calls it Kimball Square, address 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. I was unaware I was living on the corner of Kimball. So my final COMMENTS are listed below. 1. It appears to me that the owner is trying to do more with the Southlake Plaza property than its allows. The former size,if fully occupied, is large enough to be a noise,trash and traffic problem to the nearby Residents. I have lived near it for 17 years and I know what kind of noise and mess it can cause. 2. I object to the requested elimination of all buffer zones. Buffer zones are in the plans and codes to: Separate commercial from residential property. I see no valid reason for the City to grant a waiver in this case. 3. I feel that buffer zone elimination creates a precedent which is undesirable for the city as a whole. If Buffer zones are routinely eliminated, I can expect to have commercial/industrial developments on my other sides and back property lines. 4. My first suggestion to the current owner is to keep the property the current size. 5. My second suggestion to the owner, if he feel that expansion is in his plans, is to request a waiver on the number of parking spaces and retain the required buffer zone. 6. The storm water drainage from this property has been a problem since it was constructed. It was not built in conformance with the original plans. Storm water, and earlier, surface water from the septic tanks, ran on to the yards of the three lots north of the property. The expansion plans call for an increase of approximately 28,000 square feet of additional roof and pavement. There is no mention of any drainage improvements. cval-A4-/- (fM" l Case No. Agenda Item Attachment I ZA99-139 8A Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas k MEMORANDUM July 18, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-80, Appointments to the Board of Directors for the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) Number One to Fill Expired Terms Action Requested: City Council appoint members to fill expired two-year terms. Background Information: The Board of Directors was established by Ordinance No. 682 September 23, 1997 and amended by Ordinance No. 761 on December 7, 1999. The Board makes recommendations to the City Council regarding the administration of the Zone. The Board of Directors consist of 12 members. Governing bodies of the each of the taxing units participating in the TIRZ (Carroll Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County Junior College District, Tarrant County Hospital District), shall each appoint one member to the board. The Southlake City Council shall appoint eight members who, in accordance with Section 3.02 of the Charter, shall serve at the will and pleasure of the City Council. A member who is a member of the City Council shall cease to be a member of the TIRZ at the time he or she ceases to be a member of the City Council. The City Council shall designate a member of the Board to serve as chair, and the Board shall elect from its members a vice chairman and officers as it sees if. Currently, terms for eight positions on the Board expired May 2000. (see attached list) Financial Considerations: None Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: None Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 00-80 9A-1 Billy Campbell, City Manager 1 July 13, 2000 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Please place this item on the July 18, 2000 City Council agenda. Attachments: Resolution No.00-80 9A-2 City of Southlake, Texas Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One Members Term to Expire Vacant 5/2000 (formerly held by Councilmember Ralph Evans) Vacant 5/2000 (formerly held by Councilmember Scott Martin) Rick Stacy 5/2000 Wayne Moffat 5/2000 Ronnie Kendall 5/2000 Debra Edmondson 5/2000 Gary Fawks 5/2000 Buddy Luce, CISD representative (resigned 7/99) Other Members Ted Gillum, Superintendent, CISD Larry Darlage, Tarrant County Junior College District Drenda Witt, Tarrant County Hospital District Jane Sanford, Tarrant County 9A- attachment City of. Southiake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER ONE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, after public hearing created Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One, City of Southlake, on September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, a Board of Directors was established by the City of Southlake Ordinance No. 682, adopted September 23, 1997 and was amended by Ordinance No. 761, adopted December 7, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Southlake appointed eight members to the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number one on November 4, 1997; and, WHEREAS, there currently exists eight vacant positions on this board, four held by former Councilmembers Ralph Evans, Scott Martin, Wayne Moffat, Debra Edmondson, three held by current Councilmembers Ronnie Kendall, Gary Fawks and Mayor Rick Stacy and one held by CISD representative Buddy Luce. THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the City of Southlake hereby appoints the following members to fill positions on the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One, City of Southlake, Texas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. CISD representative 9A-3 City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 00-80 July 18, 2000 Page 2 Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS B ': Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary M:\W P-FILES\CITYSEC\RESOLU\Res-00-80.do c 9A-4 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM • July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext.757) SUBJECT: Review of progress and service levels of Call a Ride Southlake, Inc. (CARS), and consideration of additional funding for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Action Requested: City Council review of the progress and service levels of CARS, and consideration of authorizing funding for an additional amount up to $7,500 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Background Information: Call a Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) was organized as a non-profit corporation in November of 1999, including the establishment of a board of directors. In the fall of 1999 CARS established operating policies, recruited and trained volunteer drivers, and established a dispatch service. CARS began offering transportation services in January, 2000. • At the April 4, 2000 meeting, the City Council considered entering into a Scope of Services Agreement with CARS for a requested amount of$22,500. This amount was identified by CARS officials as necessary to cover start up costs and operating expenses for a nine (9) month period, beginning in January 2000. The City Council authorized funding in the amount of $15,000, and requested CARS return with updated ridership information prior to the fourth quarter. At that time, the Council would consider an additional amount of$7,500 for CARS services. (Section 3 of Agreement) Mr. Dick Johnston, CARS Chairman of the Board, has requested a City Council review of the organizational development over the course of the year, and will be present at the meeting to present a report to the City Council and to answer questions. Financial Considerations: Amending the Scope of Services Agreement with CARS for the proposed amount would increase the financial commitment from the City from the current $15,000 to $22,500. The approved FY 1999-2000 Community Services Division budget allocated $83,500 for community-services. The FY 1999-2000 Community Services • budget was amended to total $66,500 in May 2000. To date $59,000 has been approved by City Council to requesting organizations. Ii) 19 , I .r" , Billy Campbell, City Manager July 14,2000 2 Citizen Input/ Board Review: The City Council approved a Scope of Services Agreement with CARS in the amount of $15,000. At this time the City Council committed to review the Scope of Services Agreement with CARS in July 2000, based upon the progress and service levels of the organization, and consider the approval of an additional amount of funding up to $7,500 for the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Legal Review: The City Attorneys have reviewed the Scope of Services Agreement with CARS. Alternatives: Input towards the review of the Scope of Services Agreement with CARS as desired, and approval of an amendment to the Agreement at varying levels, up to $7,500. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Copy of the Scope of Services Agreement with CARS, approved by the City Council on April 4, 2000. • •. Monthly Summary of Service Report through June 2000 • CARS User List • CARS Financial Summary, dated June 22,.2000 Staff Recommendation: Place as an item on the July 18, 2000 City Council agenda to review the progress and service levels of the organization of CARS, and to consider authorizing additional funding for CARS for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 in an amount up to $7,500. KH • in d,� OFFICIAL RECORD AGREEMENT BETWEEN • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation located in Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor(hereinafter referred to as"City"), and Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc., a non-profit corporation of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Chairman (hereinafter referred to as"CARS"), an organization which has applied for exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. WHEREAS, the purpose of CARS is to provide non-emergency transportation to senior citizens and disabled persons ("qualified persons"); and WHEREAS, City and CARS desire to enter into an Agreement whereby CARS will provide free non-emergency transportation to qualified residents of the Southlake Community and participants in programs offered by the Southlake Senior Activity Center; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOWN BY ALL THESE PRESENT: That City and CARS, in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereunder set forth, do hereby covenant and agree as • follows: • SECTION 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CARS shall provide the following services: (1) CARS will provide on-call transportation for qualified persons of the City as follows: • (a) Disabled individuals (of any age) or senior citizens (over the age of 55 years) and, (b) are residents of Southlake, (c) whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the drivers and vehicles available. (2) CARS will provide transportation to the persons identified in Section A. (1) above: (a) to and from non-emergency medical appointments, dental appointments, and health care providers located within a 25 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center; (b) for personal need, including necessary essentials, i.e., to and from the grocery 4110 store, drug store, bank, personal grooming, social activities, etc., located within a seven (7) mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center. \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-D.DOCPage I aA 3 , 0° (3) CARS shall not be obligated to transport disabled individuals for whom CARS is unable to provide safe transportation. (4) CARS shall operate solely in accordance with its bylaws as follows: (a) Volunteer drivers who use their own vehicles shall provide the transportation services. CARS shall recruit, qualify, and train these drivers. (b) Transportation services will be provided Monday through Friday during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, or by special arrangement. (c) Transportation normally will be scheduled at least 24 hours prior to departure. (5) CARS will maintain detailed records of qualified persons served, trip destinations and mileage driven, driver and other qualifications, revenues received, and cost and expenses incurred. B. CITY shall provide the following: (1) City agrees to publicize the services of CARS within selected current City mailings, on the City's Cable Television Channel and other means at the discretion of the City. O. (2) City shall name a staff contact person to serve as a liaison between City and CARS. (3) Funds to cover additional insurance premium to have the City named as an additional insured on CARS automobile liability insurance coverage, not to exceed $700. SECTION 2 - GOVERNANCE A. CARS shall be solely governed by its board of directors, who shall meet in accordance with the bylaws. The time, date, place and agenda of these board meetings shall be the responsibility of CARS. SECTION 3 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES In recognition that the City elected to support a volunteer group establishing the senior and disabled citizens transportation program rather than provide such service as a City owned community transportation service, and that CARS is in its initial start-up year of operations, having commenced transporting qualified users in January 2000 as promised, City agrees to a , stipend to be paid to CARS in the amount of $15,000 upon the signing of this Agreement. The 401) City Council will review the progress and service levels of CARS in approximately three (3) months from the signing of this Agreement and will determine at that time whether an additional \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-D.DOCPage 2 IOP, L1 . • 0 $7,500 will be awarded to the CARS program. • Payment by the City shall be applied towards the costs of the following: • Supplies and printing costs associated with advertising CARS service to Southlake residents. • Telephone and other utilities associated with dispatching volunteer drivers. • Rent of office space from which to coordinate operations of CARS. • Personnel expenses. • Other operational costs. SECTION 4 REPORTING A. CARS shall generate and provide to the City quarterly reports which shall include ridership information showing the number of riders and the types of trips. CARS shall also provide expenditure records related to operating expenses, i.e.,rent, telephone, utilities, printing and supplies, insurance and personnel expenses. City liaison shall have access to CARS • operational records and all budget reports, during CARS normal business hours. B. CARS shall provide the City information, if requested, necessary for the City to conduct an performance evaluation including, but not limited to the following: • (1) Ridership audits; a) On-time analysis; b) user surveys. SECTION 5 • INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION A. CARS shall provide City proof of automobile liability insurance coverage with minimum limits of$250,000/$500,000,with City as an additional named insured,with any additional premium to be paid by the City as per Section 1 above. B. CARS AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER I. CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF CARS, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF \\SLKSV200I\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-D.DOCPage 3 Ib1I-5 SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. CARS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO 0 INDEMNIFY THE CITY,ITS OFFICERS,AGENTS,AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES OR LIABILITY FOUND BY A COURT TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY APPLICABLE INSURANCE COVERAGES. SECTION 6 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In performing the services hereunder, CARS is acting as an independent contractor, and City shall have no power to direct or supervise its activities in carrying out its responsibilities under this Agreement. SECTION 7 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from January 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 45 days written notice to the other. Upon termination, or if CARS ceases to provide transportation services, CARS shall return to the City any unexpended funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. 4011 This Agreement sets forth all the agreements between the parties and no modification shall be effective unless reduced to writing and signed by the party to be changed therewith. This document may be executed in duplicate originals. 1, IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and CARS have executed this Agreement as of this day II of 4 , 2000. • CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE CITY OF SOUT LAKE By: By: Dick ston,Chairman 'ck Stacy, Mayor \ NLgKF////���i,,� ATT ST: ATTEST: 0/ •s0, v_f r• scan= /64V/14\, ' X&16/1/44- /ill/PAX kiteld4 I g Notary Public in and for the State of City Secretary ;'0`..•••.,,,,,..•••' . � '*�c`���� Texas ';;;;�uu+�"`� a h 4.(( !, , Le &ran,t__ APPR D AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Type/Printed Name of Notary Public 1 .FCegIiNO J v/ 1 City Attorney *� ��� Notary Public )% x' ''=cF ate: Kyl �p MUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-D.DOCPage 4 10-A-lo ' Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. of 33de (a` ms Monthly Summary of Service Provided to Seniors and Handicapped �►t�rlolFe January February March April• May June July Totals Newly Qualified Users 32 4 11 3 2 5 Total Qualified Users 32 36 47 50 52 57 Total Volunteer Drivers 17 23 29 25 22 21 Unduplicated Users Served this Month 14 14 16 18 14 19 Volunteer Drivers Used this Month 7 9 13 16 14 13 Driver Miles Traveled 302 572 804 1087 961 772.9 4498.9 Driver Hours 13.5 32.5 40.4 56.2 50 43.94 236.54 Office Volunteer Hours 113 111 104.6 89.75 73 83.15 574.5 One Way Trips Medical/Dental 4 7 19 27 10 34 10'1 Southlake Senior Center 19 29 42 61 60 51 262 Personal Needs 4 8 24 8, 13 17 74 Shopping 0 2 0 2 4 2 10 Business 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Senior Centers 0 2 2 2 0 0 6 Other 4 0 3 4 3 0 14 Total One Way Trips 31 48 89 104 90 104 466 Rider Groups Seniors >55 31 48 89 104' 90 98 460 Handicapped 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 Total 31 48 89 104 90 104 466 • III ina1 Call A Ride of Southlake - User List T� Last Name First Name Address City Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments II) Alexander Jeane 1204W.Southlake BI Southlake (817)481-3838 Terry Plemons 817 481-7696 high blood pressure 1 Ammerman Sharon 1234 Timberline Ct. Southlake (817)481-9017 Bill Ammerman (817)994-6073 Has MS;Sometimes uses a 53 cane or walker. Anderson Maedelle 2013 Heatherbrook Dr Grapevine (817)421-6397 Dr Stephen Anderson 81 7 488-4142 Slow walking;uses cane 2 sometimes. Bachner Anne 804 Stratford Dr. Southlake (817)416-7643 Karen Bachner (817)262-4536 Cane 56 Bandy Faye 5620 Fannin St Watauga (817)281-4060 Deborah Gibson (817)485-7802 9 Bickerstaff Beverly 710 Longford Dr Southlake (817)329-1447 Beverly Heam (817)336-8148 10 Bickerstaff Clyde 710 Longford Dr Southlake (817)329-1447 Beverly Hearn (817)306.8148 11 Bordonano Lina 813 Longford Drive Southlake (817)251-9696 Tony Bordonano (817)247-7145 Diabetic 55 Brock Johnnie 5505 Oak Hills Dr. Colleyville . (817)498-6364 John R.Brock (817)4425409 Uses cane. 54 Bumette Margaret 1002 Quail Run Rd: Southlake (817)488-5649 Jeff White (817)488-9139 34 • Byrd Kathryn 1306 Concord Ave Southlake (817)481-6273 Beverly Davidson (817)481-6273 Cane;Vision Impaired;Go to 12 driveway gate-side door Cate Mabel 2050 E. Dove Rd Southlake (817)488-8083 Linda Carter (817)488-5180 13 Conner William 1530Autumn Dr. Grapevine (817)481-3622 Paula Pafford Cane 37 iM.CfYtillptiztwop,3:4 'y `MY`i OV.,`1`'75,7,,F„at t,,M,'3WitMMSZtr,15M'8S^'.£PAAC .'K?",,r,:SV >Sa`.,a'fi`,^'£LINI:T:'4i'.AIV,,VSv. ., '1.ttr,11,1::b%YY::alal."e2Y44,a t+9.:"3,Z PSYV ix..,,^!§k...iAte'i".°B[',*c'"? '#klet'fl$`k.",.�'d'+";"+.SY+. h:rVMP `-nta tnn: al Tit my 13, 2000 Page 1 • IDA4 Last Name First Name Address City Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments II) Douglas Silvia 805 Potomac PI Southlake (817)424-3184 Ingrid Ford 817 424-3184 3 • Evans Lois 2708 Miles City Ct Southlake (817)251-1716 Patty Fleming 817 251-1819 4 Greene Ouida 1302 Normandy Dr Southlake (817)421-6648 Deborah Viebrock (817)421-6648 Cane sometimes 14 Greenough Frieda 2911 Peninsula Dr Grapevine (817)488-7544 Betsy Grouly 817 488-7544 5 • Hanson Vi 802 Potomac PI Southlake (817)329-8812 Lorelei Almand 807 329-8812 Parkinsons 6 Herron Lenora 500 S.White Chapel Southlake (817)48843957 Theresa Gentry 972 445-5374 7 Hoger Mary 702 Nelson Ct Southlake (817)424-5212 Sherry Nevens 817 424-5212 Cane 8 Hunt Charity 805 Potomac PI. Southlake (817)424-3184 Ingrid Ford (817)424-3184 Cane 43 Johnston Matalyn 1106 Brazos Dr Southlake (817)421-4227 Dick Johnston (817)421-4227 15 Johnston Richard 1106 Brazos Dr Southlake (817)421-4227 Matalyn Johnston (817)421-4227 16 Jones Pat 1405 Mary Ct Roanoke (817)431-0469 Geo Fisher (817)379-0964 17 Keyes Gwen 608 Winter Wood Dr. Grapevine (817)4168185 George Nichols (817)4885808 44 Lafkiotes Regina 216 Canyon Lake Dr. Southlake (817)488-6531 Marie Jordan (817)978-4763 Walker 39 Lafkiotes James 216 Canyon Lake Dr. Southlake (817)488-6531 Marie Jordan (817)978-4763 Diabetes/Heart Condition 38 ' fi t HY,.1.„1 .. ,,dar ,mo t in .a.: Hit /utr 1.3. 2000 Page 10 A.1 Last Name First Name Address City Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments ID . Land Clarissa 2900 Bumey Ln Southlake (817)424-3516 Ken Land (817)481-4267 18 Leich Thelma 1500 Autumn Dr. Grapevine (817)481-3622 Marie Bass (817)481-6268 Wheelchair 40 Long Zona 2023 E.Dove Rd Southlake (817)488-6861 Alma Williams (817)481-8929 Walker 36 Mailman Ann 105 Meadowlark LN Southlake (817)421-9957 Rodney Wood (214)312-3631 Total laryngectomy-does not 19 speak Mason Irene 805West Murphy Colleyville (817)281-7362 Phillip Mason (817)431-2252 46 Mulvehill Bridget 1925 N.Peytonville Av Southlake (817)421-4264 Sharon Meyer (817)329-5306 48 O'Connor Jean 1400 Park Blvd,#2601 Grapevine (817)421-6320 Lynn Lindblad (817)488-33E6 20 Peery Frances 1903 Haymeadow Ct Southlake (817)251-8820 Jackie Atwell (817)251-8820 21 Purvinis Marie 1795 Kingswood Dr Southlake (817)337-0209 Mary Purvinis-Hart (817)337-0209 22 . Rentfro Kathleen 2735 N White Chapel Southlake (817)488-4023 Bonnie Hays (817)481-4713 Cane sometimes 23 Sandlin Emma 1590 N Gravel Cir Southlake (817)424-5100 Sheila Mullens (817)481-2137 24 Schneider Elizabeth 3004 Woodhaven Dr. Grapevine (817)488-8808 Suzanne Schneider (817)931-8893 Cane;Feeble;needs to ride in 52 sedan-type vehicle Schreiber Willie 411 E.Highland St. Southlake (817)488-8672 Lyndon Schreiber (817)237-0962 Parkinsons 42 Schreiber Bernice 411 E.Highland St. Southlake (817)488-8672 Lyndon Schreiber (817)237-0962 41 ,,:._ %--;t.>::_ ,41., , . K,. ;Nr;,eat��..T.� .N,;i,MW -. ,.'. � + : ..M� nx-,-:�.O,- r b:: _..,,,,,. - m�-- Ttu uh 13.2000 Page 3 IDA-/0 Last Name First Name Address City Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments ID Segers Lois 500 N.Shady Lane Southlake (817)481-4027 Joan Peterson (972)701-6305 50 Segers Robert 500 N.Shady Lane Southlake (817)481-4027 Joan Peterson (972)701-6305 Walker at times 49 Shaffer Richard 27 Marvin Keller (817)431-3798 Margaret Shaffer (817)431-3798 47 Shuping Estelle 1310 N Shady Oaks Southlake (817)481-1258 Lesle Shuping (972)723-2666 Cane;Walker;heart problems 26 Simmons Mary 2752 Warwick Way Grapevine (817)481-6843 Tom Simmons (817)795.4830 27 Smith Pat 701 Shadow Glen Southlake (817)329-0901 Pete Smith (817)285-1236 45 Smith Kathleen 4712 Manning Dr Colleyville (817)289-9421 Mark Smith (817)267-9465 25 Spera Charline 207 Travis St Roanoke (817)491-4360 Gayle Wall (817)430-2372 28 Stafslien Doris 944 Meadow Circle N. Keller (817)431-9 01 Les or Rod Stafslien (817)337-4788 57 Stull Maydelle 741 Shady Ln Hurst (817)268-3095 Rick Stoll (817)295-0428 29 Trimarchi Helen 1405 Summer Breeze Roanoke (817)431-3617 Anthony Trimarchi (817)431-3617 30 Watson Sophie 809 Brazos Dr. Southlake (817)421-4062 Liz Watson (972)385-2244 Dizzy Spells,Fall Risk 36 Webb Lucienne 706 Helson Court Southlake (817)329-1728 Michelle Webb Lee (817)329-1728 51 Weiser Fran 308 Waterford Ct Southlake (817)251-0671 Josh Weiser (817)251-0671 Cane sometime 31 • 1 to ,L ZV;;I ..1,- X..�.: .>T,x. , .,W ,P,, ,. .m =ti. M1,1. -, t•,�a.rIV:. K n: :k; •�•1 1: �•a T> Th ulr1.3. 2000 Page 4 iIDA °II Last Name First Name Address City Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments II) Wilson Catherine 4713 Manning Dr. Colleyville (817)684-7561 Kathie Keefe (817)283.2669 33 Wood Martha 2900 Burney Ln Southlake (817)424-3516 Ken Land (817)481-4267 32 • rh uty 13,2000 Page S 10,1Z .1 • 11, ('all A Ride ul Southlake. Ink: Jute 22,2000 Ending Balance March 1. 2000 $;. t,9.3.; Donation Receipts $I ti.U74.t►U Miscl. Receipts I 71.25 Program Fees l uU • TO•I'Al. RECEIPTS $21.821 tts )isbursements I.oan $i,Ul)ll.11ll Interest• li7.t11 Telephone l xpense $ - 57.�t11 Payroll ¶ 8S0.00 P O fox rental $ 46.00 Postage . 3;.UN Supplies 'f 74.15 Rent $I.500.Ut1 -Program Expenses - $1.427.110 • NXPNNSI:S. $9.575 95 UNPAID payroll liabilities $ I2/4.64 • Bringing Balance to. $12.;73 77 • • Respcctliill) submitted by: June 22. 2000 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 • TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse located at 201 N. Kimball Ave. Action Requested: City Council consideration of sign variance. Background Information: Lowe's is building a new home improvement warehouse at the subject address. Section 16-A of the sign ordinance limits the letter height of attached signs to various heights corresponding to the distance from the property line along the appropriate street frontage. The proposed sign on the South elevation is set back more than 500 feet from Southlake Blvd. and is therefore limited to 42 inch letter heights. The requested sign has a 72 inch high L on Lowe's. The sign contains 195 square feet in area, compared to the 312 square feet permitted by ordinance. • The Home Depot, Lowe's chief competitor, is located at 300 Village Center Drive, within sight of this store. On April 14, 1996 the City Council granted a variance to the Village Center development allowing six foot tall letters on the Home Depot attached sign. The Nursery and Contractor Pick Up signs were exempt under the sign ordinance at that time. In order to be as fair as possible under the new sign ordinance, the Building Department has interpreted the garden center and indoor lumber yard as separate premises due to their separate entrances, thus allowing separate signs. This is a convenience to the customers so they don't park at the wrong end of the parking lot and have to walk an extra 400 feet. Other proposed signs on the property comply with the sign ordinance and are not a part of this request. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None 1111 10B-1 Billy Campbell July 14, 2000 Page 2 Alternatives: The council may approve the sign as requested, approve it subject to whatever changes or conditions they deem appropriate, or they may deny it. Supporting . Documents: Variance Application Sign drawing/elevation Site Plan Sections 14 and 16 of Sign Ordinance 704-A. 04-16-96 City Council Minutes Staff Recommendation: Place the request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse located at 201 N. Kimball Ave. on the July 18, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. GW/bls 10B-2 eLLEN ALLEN INDUSTRIES,INC. CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 6434 Burnt Poplar Road, Greensboro,NC 27409 (336)668-2791 Fax(336)668-7875 1-800-967-2553 Signs of Service Since 1931 June 21, 2000 Charles Bloomberg C.B.O Plans Examiner City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Chuck, In April, you assisted me with a signage proposal and the sign codes for a new LOWE"S — Home Improvement Warehouse on Kimble Ave. in Southlake. I am now applying for the sign permits for the allowable signage and a variance for the set of LOWE'S letters on the front elevation. Per our previous conversation, we had agreed that the "Indoor Lumber Yard" and "Garden Center" signage would be viewed as separate entities and that would be allowed under the signage code. That is what we are proposing in our application. I appreciate all of your help in our previous discussions and please feel free to call me should you have any questions concerning our application for signage and for our variance. Thank you again. Sincerely, y, Jim Elias Allen Industries Florida Division North Carolina Division Texas Division 11351-49th Street North, Clearwater, FL 33762 6434 Burnt Poplar Road, Greensboro,NC 27409 2003 Rutland Drive,Austin, TX 78758 (727)573-3076 1-800-677-3076 (336)668-2791 1-800-967-2553 (512)835-8745 1-888-835-2003 Fax(727)572-4815 Fax(336)668-7875 Fax(512)835-8732 10B-3 . F i • • • Li �:lr, �� . 2oao CITY OF SQUTHt.AKE _J SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION i `Ely APPLICANT OWNER(If different) NAME: ; Marc Millis Lowe ' s Companies , Inc. ADDRESS: 1Q504 Yucca Dr. _ Hwy 268 East • Austin, TX. 78759 N. Wilkesboro , NC. PHONE:I 512-401-9015 28659 FAX: i 512-401-9014 The foil q tirfornkrkon pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME O,r BUSINESS OROPERATION: Lowe ' s Home Improvement Warehouse PHYSIC1.ADDRESS: 201 N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL ESCRIPI'ION: Lot 5 Bloat 1 Subdivistcr K i mb a l l/17 0 9 addition I hereby wertiffy that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 704 as srized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the City t¢euncil meeting who is authorizzeedto discuss this request Applicants signature: k - ��C'�-- Date: /,V e 41 /h G .7. /11/44/5 7.0 .cS, ,,�c CG,•svr,sAc. ' ✓ The folio-Ong checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City(If Southiake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No.704 and amendments.and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign, dance request Completed sign variance request application. ion. ' Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance(see —71— /1--- attached.). Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs " that conform to or are exempt frvsi1 the sign ordinance, The site plan shall also indicate the building,landscaped areas, parking &approaches and adjoining street R. O. W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs,the elevations shall show the building,the sign for which the variance is requested,and any other signs that conform to or are I exempt from the sign ordinance. , I • 10B-4 i, c1 ee �e i•r•.__i iwi �.. ui .��u i I u �u.��.e�u-r..ci r.✓J1 • • Demonstration PI gaernonstrate that the follow! conditions are a licable to the uested n varla e: 1, That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will crate an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. LHe}oft en eonCeJhGn f O !/.Y r!G c f)/// C''e4/6 414 UnkIk Adjef1-nt7 GE T 1owES COitite7 i c(ei.-74/*A16- A Iblap9 ., pN Bowes, Vr5/6;(i icy hh S A chre6/- fe(4-74,,A.fhyp L0 C4/ems, Gvtig/ / 4 hole-4/ 40 w65 c/Y 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the of luted property and is not self imposed. -t, t E To T}} t3 T4 E SET Ac - on^ K t M,ALA._ ►T Ez U.1 I r o,3 a r 11-1-E -pca pec Ie9 I,l.(✓-e d LA r\DS capi.r,S AND M►NrMk-t_ STQEET St61•lA6 , 1 1S 'Me erc,-f-1v/e_ A_ xi bt) Vt St ( k + proc,o-r-E-7o►sATE 3. That the variance wilt not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. TI-Ve "Pr017° 4 S16►-)A6 i s $o r' O3@uslvC Not hA-Z oaks . I-k- IS CoNGC.ucN) NI- - At\Ac elm+ le 'c lb prne►?t6 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. 7-AZ- ,/4TEN1- OF -i 00)1K4rJcE 1s -fa Ip vlei. f4T/2.46.r/Ue AO �'aS1 E it l_ 5i 6 KAUE.. 1 14-E P-ropoself at2/4,J 2EG((EST -CooEs NoT V►b�cl.t"� -1 cd- Int-e + 'rt+E 11E6akesT 15 iN &act -A5-1-e/ -I-© scA le /J \D AepopelAT6 L T/'C cI Z t' bk o o�1 n� =�1Dviicfinglvaclatice.app 10B-5 TOTAL �.O1 • I_ 24'4' 77 • HIOM!E■UMP ROMEMEJNiraW,A1RE1HIOUS E - �• 25'-0' .1 , • H O'Mf"UMP ROM EMEN TTW ARE H O USE • 28'42- • • FRONT ELEVATION • - OPTION TWO=72'LETTERS SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" ALLEN INDUSTRIES, INC. REVISION: BY: DATE: _ FILE NAME:LOWE'S DATE: 6/20/00 CLIENT REVIEW STATUS 643GLEN 668-791 Fax (9 0)Road88 'NC-274092553 LOCATION:SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS , I APPROVED urhm�o�s aoi (910)668-2791 Faxt910)668.7875 1-800-967-2553 A I love[a n[ww�r 11351 49th Sheet North Clearwater,FL 34622 • (813)573-3076 Fax(813)5724815 1-800-677-3076 Me gapy,vs.WNW.,re. pawns! DES AGENT.HOUSE FILE NUMBER:ATX0058 — Signs of Service Since 1931 mu 2003 Rutland Road,Austin'7X 78758 m"°dm hPaha l.GYnr0lar� Abeby�yy,"e ab nab •wall bags" (512)835-8745 Fax(512)835-8732 1-888-835-200.3 N:�y�'a�in.'a DRAWN BY:LARRY DROZD SCALE: AS NOTED � ra,�,,, „ npMesOdr' May./rpa CT 1 4 4 T T T T ? 4 T 9) 4 q 9) i i 1 1 1 i 1 1 ii i i i i ----- -I 1.. El !ME m m © El— m 1-1 m _� -g_ LulllE$ _-�_ 4y W u3 •-O�p f-p7= r---'r (� _ 7 rft..,„___. FI .1. T -.� EM si E�I III 0114 �` iip�i a'� 42" Lc-rTEcs T 9) 9) 9) 9 ¶ 9) 9) 4 ¶ 9) 9 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 i I i i . C LOWE'S_ '_ t._. — :: ' --Fe E F i Urn 1 s Ff .� T-� j J r.If N1 rt.`IN--_ _ irfl am ai_ 3 bid si -'Mil_I� _— ,1-, 1 7 51 LETTERS 9) 4 9 T q ¶ 9) 9) 4 q q 9) 9) q i i 1 1 1 i i i ii i 1 i i I — m El Li m ® m III lbOWE'S m IMF ir=m —• ''::3 _ E�a�ie E i�'siie �E E��� E _ = Mt a�air nisi •E11 (, ' LErreRs . 0 ed V • ! • T H c-P T 1 / • ,,, \ ,,,,, 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII icfl �1 pt�t'a •� S. . .. t::M x ... .....0;$rii r mow 4 ., i,, sx s : 'x.t ;!� i ��;��{[ r,IF{E1 {; - vs.—. ! - wilt!, M1746iQ:�' -i„t ' ]`= 4 r cur,... t L itilill-LIli_rlr Llu LP j I ° . d i . _ — _ _ r.> •1 � � INi�•- --- -- ) e -1[ h n � , IrJ!_1C !�_1_LL_ n IT --- . SCALE: 1"=10'-0" N t 00 I . 1 i i i f • i { T H cr) T i ....., ......, _......... . ....., ...._ ,,,,,,•,...„„ ..,., ........ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ........,,. ........„ ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,......, . , ,,,,,,,,,,,,, _,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,, ,,,,..,,,,,.n.,,,,,.. „,„,„""„ ,,,,,,,,,, , _.,...... : , ,,, ,_ ______. _ _ __ __,_ _ _ . ‘ _.... r ___, i 1=1 7 1], ffiLii 0 i 4 . _.,„ _ , :, .,‘ 4 .__, _ ,,-. , si_ t.,E1_ _v-4_ 4, 4,_. "T ill' 4'1 A _El_____L_______ u_____ , a a a i I -11 II 11 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 • 11 1 1 , aaa_ �yy�/ •a:.•■a s a i■ i - �•a .SAY �i''- h 4 iiMaT- WM i•r�i •ai.Mai ; I i i �a " .�� 7 i .• Qi a.,F i a • .,...�.... A i1� S 7.-:u,--<.._ :L MEM . lin_, :ii_i_i_......_ ,__ = ___._. ..r_.,,., ,,.._, _______ ____ ___ _,_" ----ri- -- ' - - ",,,,,' --. _ _=_ __.., AG _,_/_,„ _ \,/ \ / n n m SCALE: 1"=10'-0" 0 td T 7 Y , T ...„..,,.. 1 ...... ,,,,, .., .„, __ -1 _..... _ . . -... _ .. _____ __ ,_____ __. ..... 1.- -. 11111I)Trriii_ _ c) TY* 7.:.r ... , "af.••'..177'"• I I _ -.;;-;--- '- ---• i I 1 • ; , f i . ,,,, . 2 _ --- _._ [mil ttli ' _L----__J ,.....,_,......_„ , .-__Ui---- ____ -=_L-- ---_ CCD ,011,1 .4'. '''' ;'141 '' Pt 14 L - -——— Ell 0 a . --- t . _ .,E' ri, : _______ ________._. ______ a••:'; a a.a,,,a , fdr.,,..," ...,-1.,-, ,,..,. ,- .,-,.---= - ' .11:11:fraciftrit_d:P:e.,S:1- 1 tc,'-'-:, lit':firr'Slift1;;4`,.;', i...,4 iftp._ . - 1 1. ',1.14. Ti.U. -I :r:11:%' tt1S1 ,,,,,,,,,,,. ____,:, , „,,,.,,• „,,•.-.---- 777-,-;-,-;---,. i !1.1.:•,-;` ,;-,i-:11-11EILT,11.}-. :H"--q1 idilr.::1111,,,f---.-1--- `',1-. -i'r'4:11I-111Ex ' That111111 Er -.11....-Eti'lliiL-1-IL tti.-41.1.ii,1!„.1„1 , H,H,i„,-,,„. :.,!,.,;:;:,,,,, -_,,,....1.1,-.1.1.1.1•Lii.U1111.11i11.111UU LI N 4 .-.-. .- - . _ _____._ _, . I ., . _ .._ -J1-.1-1------.-- ,.Li,A__, ii r,_11 `I - ' t 1‘. ..711".-;-:------ 1 . , / !..I \ ' ' / I \ / 1 \ -:-. 'I' .2 '.. l' '-' - • k: II -)t___-_ _t____ , ;. 4,- g ••„• g - =- •= •:- 1 -' - -rt -•--.7-1••!-.*'',7.-- _.... •-•-'''-'-'--_-.in.__,-- :.:,-,f.,-.:_-_,.,-,.-,,if. -........‘,____ . __ __ ___.._ _.1-q-..: !-.9._;,,H__I-G. \ ' ' ' ' ' I I i i - .. ., . - ____ILII LG,iii/ic 1 n E.,.., SCALE: 1"=1 0'—0" . .. ed • i 1 I C) II • • . . " • EAWBOUN - .......”....''',.......................— -,......-,.......--..........P8.ESEN.. T ST4T "WY. "4 • - -•-- --..... L I Ali I 1 . • - -..--------,.....X;;,...-..,...•. 41116114iffiiiiirai....._ , D THROUGH LANE / . -• _ • . .---....?,:•'., -4/..."31;1/-----•. - 7:.•-•::::,777.---......../152.-W.11/3.I lit.......---.............. -- ....... -_. ..... ,-PROPOSED-STATE 111GMAY-14--"=----- j .47-2::-"• _•_:-_--74:1_14-1:;1- ----•1--- ---INJURE-7-—-S—TA-T—E HWY--—-.-11:71I.'. , 4--a_t _ -- Rx'"nvinVirscem's --•ii-777:,11 ' A-1 ill ....., ! AM=TO 11.44=14,1 UR RI 4./Rommm/R4. /moo. . 1.11,127101.1.0 Ilk lex ;•,.73.34,-,n ... ,..4----- zoNoice„. 1 AT 3 ! i . . .II It - . 1 2 44: 4-:T .. .. . . ..... .....z... ilf!, •441•44.41/44•• "4 ri--/ _ ...- _... ___ . . .. ... . .. __ PM Mt 114/CCM I.C°61,I 41:i W Sip b . . ...... -- - -- 1 ;:.... • .--. ___7,_._._,_:_. _•••,, " • -'s. . comsritucrrow worts: g,..-) • :;:!) ., ....... , . . • ..... , _.,..........._ W 8 .t-• 2:2..^.-.----=‘-,-=z---:-...------"-----=-:— ILI z 1.,-,- pi!' a^ ilti 'I I,ll Ail:2!illili . ..• - , ' r.:-.-tr.:::.•'..1.1r`"'""'""`""-"'"""''''—''""" I I "' 40'4' ---- '..... : . ...........„..............,......,......... ... P i qpi (,.: ...... :41.,Til F.,_— , V t { F h I li Lifcrr,Hi i III H f__' _ , _ • ...----—.„- • ---------- , .11fliipasor . •• - • . ________ m. • pi!, - I 1 I 1 , \ ‘1, \ \ \ Uftnr• ..... 14_77., lag/a' ...... -... .,-, a.- .1..........=,.........=...-..-....-...........-....-... g 5 I illy R i 111 1 . 1111111111T1311 . - " ...I-J:-''777.,....;1......= ....—..'".'"..: , ,, 0 pi!, -.11.-=-Trz--tz":-----------...r.r.::-. k„. . 1 Pr , . 1 1 V •, i' . I '. ...• . , '.4....•--,----- 0 ILI •I, _ ..=...1.-.=..7.--z-=:.....:::,...-:„......._. -,1 rep -z-z,:.-....-z-z....--=-------------- .,.••••• ,, ; ‘ ,...,, ii Ii7ri - 1 p g 4•I ii . 6 '.7..'.=..."Vr..2."..=.1.=::==.,"1`.:2.7"- 1 IA ; ., el:111.111111111 II . 1. . , ''''':rr.T.-...."1 1 I 1 ',,12 ' 1 E• _r. .....______ :-----...' BLOC,2,11.111341./,09 ADORICT \. '../ I \ 2:1-..;"'. cr llip CABRE7 A.SLICE 144 :f3-rI'' , Aiffil /R7•11.T•TI•t- 4 1-1 :,,,... —,,,,,i ! : I ii ....`"tr-=''....f.:.:. --.. ........ \..-ti.,._...,..-.."...1.00 .41.10:-se ri-..,s.t....:,ti..,...,.,i,Li 1111M11 .._... 1, i -,---:-, - 1;1 airy' i..1' ,, .111I 1.11 . 1:--. \ I, %,• • cA %.: i .: " Ilk ' .'',, ,, .,-:: I i I Eon, •••••••••• • I a I P:1 RUM D.MVP." \. ,1'.& \ ‘t F.F..548.00 .%;d:,s.'" 1 i MERE..06,PAR1141333R1P.1.111 ma e4 LOT 5 , ,,,,,,„,„........ IND MIR SLUE VOL 10122.PC 221 L.P.P. VOL 4123,PC.313 tt li.. , \ "•Usw. 14-7113/Am i I ZONED-ACR/CULTURAL mauls SI Pi P.N.. r—I PRT.CT \ \ \ t t '--A:4,..., 1 L ' . • '.; Il .•/' ..... R '1 444.44.""...= 744/1 E .1:1313•47 ZCNED C-3 ...., , m . ;i/.1,1.5,61..0 r ,,)/ I 1, 3, \ \ WI ' ,---7. 1..-Meill1!IT:L//fra• 1 ... }.... -2,"•--: .' . - /,I • -••,-., I ............. ..•.....• % 1%2 \ ‘ . ) 1 ti. •. 111111.111E/ i i-:.;:- .,,. 1 :................--=,..-7-. -.------;..:.------- cif Z BERM \\\ .. \.. ......... -..,,,-,-'m w ., ./;././..: I .. . ;,..4.....,:: % i: • 0 WAL-MART \,. ; 2 I.. ........... .. '- .... i - --7 aadassaids2_72a., mr. IMI TRACT *11•4; ' 0%. "i.,, %itif.."-PK:4•11, 5,.i..•:., s t to ‘\ ,,,I, :-. -• --- __A--- _ ,t..4g1 , ' II . I I Iii, . IP: :5 I ...... 0 .t..,, ,....., .,•‘41,,,------ 1,,,,—...-- 1 ,,re. 131111111 18 11-..- 'AsV .... ...•••••• * r C v • - M.0%$ --,.-=-,_, ',:,• '4,"`21t,-•' -",-,q. 40r- '-•".-1' . I vo L...........C. P.A. ROM LOT 2.BLOCK 1.FARRAR•ocmcm, \‘, ... \: `, ., 2 2 . 11111: 2 '..."....: 1...C....... CA/411E7 A,SUOE 1975 1 CARDEN 1111/10011111 -...,;?:-.7.: "' , •111.0•20.0.211 •12/80 IV •Si IP P.,..........• \t111171011111#4111111111111i11111111 .1..2.• .. '... _1 ........• ) je, ,.. ,/.,A.4f2V-.. '.,.••t•-''':;,'.. ="*'7.2'717...'. ' ' Elilli1111:1111111111/11 '. S - .....71, -!.:‘ .. k . ,. ., ••••• •,. %,-1._ ., .- ;=iiiiiimn -, 1,-... f7 . -. , • -- ,• • ., -i-.4„,„ f1:7:......::,..,:cp _.--,----— --kw, . -_..... .1=2„,..,c,...-, . • ! .• NOM i i 1 1 _ 40A1111111111-4412S2 tea';37.11.-3-2:-...,...... • /344;,-7.4AT, SOMILIXE BLVD CURRIIRLY 4.4 .. -- .MS 4 LAVES RI CENTER 11.11141 UWE 111.111,142C OCSIGM 15 7 LAVES ' I-. •I * ''''"', •!'",. r..--=7-4--.,.a,. -. 1 Ft4P111114444.ek4 "f 4-4. ' H 1 1 ! 1 kii....- ........ .,.-,, ,. ._..nl ) r ----__ it ---__. 6411frililira IV j risi -- 4-P.,.;4. -...-.. ---NP'iT,ti2--: ,_--,;77--- -----;----;'' i 0:1: --z--1 /210 0131ERS SW Mi.Rom I i N_ •. ,-.., VOL 109S5 PC 1431 SI. , ,.- .., IONE° C-3 •-•..,. - IM'alk VW"- ....... ... r NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR... .., t, 1.0 OM .1,4130111C41. : r T .' .., ........ .1 .,.•..41,\.....- ZO3DC-3 ' .,...".....-.._.",...,.. t,=r1i.1F..:1"1.I67.,'.::1'.:71!'•.1..1".7'.;.'7.'...4,P1"444.41.1'4.7T1-.r1"t..."".". ' 1I P" 9-6AP; 6"". 21 M 71 NZ i .9J.8O0N.-0P .C,11 E-..• ....„.... s'. --.-- nerlir•27•=i:••• •:4.11.. ' ..._„ (Cary CLOS Paanditao 17...0*-4421D • t.1....4•4.,,/Is aci • SEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance,the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures,poles,curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets,utility poles,public buildings, fences,railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three(3) square foot area used for building identification. 2. MINIMUM /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Maximum Letter/Logo Height Less than 100 ft. 12 inches 101 - 150 ft. 18 inches 151 -200 ft. 24 inches 201 -250 ft. 30 inches 251 -300 ft. 36 inches 301 and greater 42 inches * -For any lease space which does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access(see Appendix`B' for further clarification). 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet(see Appendix'A'for further clarification). 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance,provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2) attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated, the 75% rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix 'B'for further clarification). 10B-12 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any • building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure(See Appendix `B' for further clarification). 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to canopies. 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade(other than the main front of the building)which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet(150')of the property line of said residential property. 10B-13 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes April 16, 1996 page twelve Agenda Item #S-C,.%A96-34. Plat Revision for Timarron Co1P Course Addifon ZA 96-34, Plat Revision showing Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 1, Timarron Golf Course Addition, being approximately 12.61 acres situated in the Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and being a revision of property legally described as Lot 3. Block 1, Timarron Golf Course as shown on the flat recorded in Cabinet A, Page Slide 1889, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, Current Yoning is "R-P IJ-f) No. 1" Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: '1'imarron Land Corporation. SPIN Neighborhood f19. According to the Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, the land use category For this property is mixed use, according to the Land Use Plan, One (I) notice was sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and no written responses have. been received. Todd Jansen, Carter and Burgess, Inc. Dallas, was present for the meeting. Motion was made to approve ZA 9'-34, Phil Revision, subject to the Plat Review Summary No. I, dated March 21, 1996. Motion: Richarrue Second: Evans Ayes: Richwine, Evans, Hall, Muller, Warrth,sganss, Fickes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Council adjourned for recess at 9:00 p.m. Council returned to open session 9:25 p.m. Agenda Item #10=A, Village CevacrSiEn \'atiaiuc•r.Rc nest Bob Whitehead presented the request for a sign variance for Village Center and the Home Depot, noting that they have requested numerous variances to Southlake's Sign Ordinance. Chuck Bloomberg, Plans Examiner, has reviewed the submittal and his findings are included in the packet for Council review. Don Silverman, Developer for Village Center, was present to present facts regarding their request for variances to several of the signs. Pamela Abair wits also present. Ms. Abair works with Collins Signs in Louisiana maid Stated the company does all the signs for Home Depots. Motion was ntac1c to approve the requests for variances for Village Center as follows; 1 type A sign on Hwy 114 with an enclosed base, 1 type D sign on F.M. 1709 with an enclosed base, 5 type C signs on F.M. 1709, 3 type C: signs internally on Village Center Drive, also, 10B-14 .gun-C`J-tJJ V23: .i • Regular City Council Meeting Minutes April 16, 1996 page thirteen Agenda Item #10-A,, Continued allowing for the attached letter variances for Home Depot to go with 6 foot high Ietters, to Kroger for the variances on the "K" and "(I" respectively; also the Village Center Logo on A and I); also allowing the Kroger wall sign on the back sign of the Kroger in lieu of the second type A sign on F.M, 1709; and to include the square footage of the signs as requested. Motion: Richarme Second: Evans Ayes: 'Richarme, Evans, Hall, Muller, Wamlasganss, Fickcs Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote A nda item ##10-C, Developer Agreement for South Hollow At the request of the applicant, the Developer Agreement for South hollow will be tabled time certain May 7, 1996. Motion; Warnbsganss Second: Hall Ayes: Wantbsganss, flail, Evans, Muller, Richarrne, Fiekes Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote (toi table) Agenda Item #2,A, Continued Mayor Fickes informed the audience that Council would be returning to executive session pursuant to chapter 551 of the Texas (;overnment Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076, of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending and contemplated litigations, and to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and to consider the appointment ;end evaluation of public officials. Council adjourned to executive session at 10:13 p.m. Council returned to open session at 10:50 p.m. Agenda Item #2-8. Action 1Veces ary,.Continned No action was taken is a result of the executive session. Councilmernber Pamela Muller commented that she wants to go on record regarding the action that will he takiiis= place regarding the contract for the City Manager, stating she personally disagrees with it and that her reasons arc not personally against the City Manager, but with a whole new council being elected, 10B-15 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Matarangi,Ltd. located at 325 Miron Drive. Action Requested: City Council consideration of sign variance. Background Information: The subject office building was completed in February of 1999. The owner of the building has placed the sign structure at the request of his tenants in what appeared to be an appropriate location, respecting the landscaping, however, it did not meet the required setback. When the sign contractor was called to make the lettering for the sign the violation was noticed. Other buildings in this development have similarly styled monument signs. Section 16-B of the sign ordinance requires monument signs to be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the property line. The proposed sign in the front yard is approximately at the property line. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the sign as requested, approve it subject to whatever changes or conditions they deem appropriate, or they may deny it. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Sign Drawing and Photographs Site Plan and Location Map Sections 14 and 16-B of Sign Ordinance 704-A Staff Recommendation: Place the request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Matarangi, Ltd. located at 325 Miron Drive on the July 18, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. GW/bls 10C-1 N_ 1 6-30-2300 4: 14P�1 FROM JCL 61 / 251 L151 / CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLICANT OWNER(if different) NAME: James Lancaster ADDRESS: 600 Garden Ct. Southlake, TX 76092 PHONE: 817/371-4007 FAX: 817/251-0517 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Matarangi, Ltd. Lease Buildings PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 325 Miron Ct. Southlake, TX LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot .3 Rilock 1 Subdivision Mi.ron Subdivision I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 704 as summarized below. I further understand that it is essary to have a representative at the City Council meeting rho is a , riz-• ./..:,,., . t. i ,r ,y - Applicant's signal e: ate: � ( Q - p The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 704 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. X _ Completed sign variance request application. X Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.). sX Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking&approaches and adjoining street R. O_ W. X Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs,the elevations shall show the building,the sign for which the variance is requested,and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The sign monument was placed approximately 3 feet closer to . curb due to trees in the garden, therefore, we are asking for this variance. (i.e. , the monument is aprx.. 3 feet closer than allowed.) 10C-2 6-30-2000 4: 15PM FROM JCL 817 251 0517 P. 2 • Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will crate an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. Placing the sign as required by code would put the sign into and behind heavy landscaping - the sign would be hard to see and not adequately serve the building tenants. 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. The building was purchased without signage in place, however, the gardens were already established.. 3. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. All other buildings in the development have similar monument signs thus it is in keeping with the environment. 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. The sign matches the design of the buildings and architecturally complements the building. M:1wpflleslbuildingtvariance.app 10C-3 . r o n c c c F -..._./.-- • . 1/21 ._. .. 6'-41/2' (6-1/z' _ T_ HR wiltRoAr ,, 41 .. .._... —I i f I Se 11$ 4. e - r.•.. TENANT NUMBER 1 vorlAs NUMBER 241.epe_. 1.4-% - .2 _i 4. TENANT NUMBER 3jL .. . s 0 1, . TENANT NUMBER 4 I ..._.� ..._.. ....[ . ... .. _ --.._. ...._ 1„ __.^... •__. �.. _.. .----- .._... - ..... _.:. . ----- .._ — _-.. I Cr: plyq LID.�325 WON mindemamene � � . , SIG 1 Yam; M1UNl/�iAB+� �DENTI F ""' MARCIA 22.2000 ...agrwA�pr ref ateArr�l jc (817)a29-0411 FAX(817)488-4484 6-30-2000 4: 16PM FROM JCL 817 251 0517 P.5 '_. • • • • • -•A':a^i2P :'z3., � '• 1 q'r.Frr .r,» .. .. r 4 r.4:.. 'k:• i 72i .i."-.bf r .' ,k'C'c', .sv>fe,- .. x( tiA: w ✓F , }04 ,�,, • N Y r .%."fir k�. "a °n.^f. it 1 .. "'7-`4,1- '` r1"'� �� ram"{ '.i0't•9 w,,y t x r zk �f-4�?'•'�S►?, ,{ . Y ' {P ..,w' � rjb�'r..,"f'•ft'„ci.s,,...m 'r.• .;`• -..:',1 '%"i.I.Arr ' W f,.rY't, .art :�''. .. 0 fi•'.• \'1 T 1 ) A`�•t. t Hr a ,P, r r, k, �� 6 t:t ^', r } r �.�X �y f( t»+ c�„S•` r. r - •"\ayyt.� y•,;'" i ,r r; " .rg ;}t��t�" (�,y�•, �yi�`•k a<:yti:':�,a4; c.`. ,�,�s li � `+:JK . r 1 ". -.1e4%1 ,t �V :^: ''K 'Zr"' v 4,-,,, ,t a �'k r,4 n "` • k' . C ��d �f }.+F;a r' ) ,r1•f�. r`.4ff,,�r,.<.R.�4',��.;,-litn'7r)�'!'6' l • Mfj�tM'.. • r •k , 5fw .y4, 4 �"',' ✓.• 'p�_ :,). Y:•1C'.t': awt7 ;1 rr �M s i�•l •�' i d , 9'i pp^§i \1y 1,\llP � �ki�' .v;?•.' �:•• ti_•^.ry',41.$ M�. i d ��f -'ThM f t r <4 Y t. r^;J7?rl r,i.,1,0' ,t.-., ,' ,r ( ,ti .'4,..t).} .-c bi,,.....{.. : i .t ",'� f t • a to i , b} t�, i's,1*ids�{{,,, '..•. i::^x:l ,5}t!6 y:���• ..y .,y ,•l-c (7'L ., •,,.. e f�1iw- �� A �r •s°P�r��?"'''FY'm•r.•$rr�,l}•:,�>..•�'S' '' �•-r: A` �►'h •f'M � hy` ',t`j�,; ' P,� `,i • 4 r.i,A s `'ti r,) ::.,,,,,y"yf-e., ..a; .,•./.,44,0i +e h7i",-,,4 `f� ti l:vir, �N . S t y l e r'27-x ,�-. of A, 'ia�.^."", !F'xrp�y?�.�;•. d•NrL"1 1,�, s. r., �' n ',.....‘,,,,,,A,..M - Y !.1.. 4 4 ,�1. / %," j7•G:r •+ k'?`.Y f• '�4:�.: t,._N •1 �r .F :X is f;Y6r,1� YM:')S`�f t'",�tS',fRirSi%r .yve.mil;�• J 2:e ;y,� �,''r �' 4 • a, .k Y- Mary-ASP• ^ 4 'C�y'�,, ��.Lr,1 � ,.'�,,:j .w-vr.4, ,-.lkr. `'S' r,�.. o"• .h !I Q:-. t�.,t;'Y 1.wq1{✓v't- 7,!IP- .(tik,,:L d ``� ',, t 0., tea i _ • (,S • • aJ Y Fr s )r^'i , _i A#1 J^r w . w {.�. S j jL{C .K,, k],ea!L,,.,ti 4 ', '!• ;. 1.Y"{•.`( iA^.A wi,...v y 1Y rrK YJ b ' 6.b,0 ' -_r-t iS'Ai Sri.f � 4: .- . ill •+ '`T YI,...:.:,',T..'I:-r^ Krr '„� i^ww' ... "e.,,.wr K.r" +Y+Cl ,114. �`t t4}�Fy `w �.•�arb' �� � �, tr,.h • yN, Rt g+. P• r• } .3•• i+�,,y, er�-4 e�.pri1.,� dw r q� tq^) Ty ..� .ri1•: c a •,- • • fy�•'r�("t,,J a,• .A. <A et,A v A.J.1,••..,.,4,pA '<.4f•4'•i;,.:• ., 1• !i'.+ +r' ♦ .w A '• :1•*7 ••• ; 4 'rt0•41 '�,,4,••OAV 4- '�'^ :il'lif 2r.•..tYn.; 4.511,s14. , �1, n!f 7?x �, s �� �'pt, i"r `` +;,,r ° �y. n '�'��'''^'is a• °(��, � t•,i., T'r r '. f• l !' t A 'fet"r.. `k 4 4< ♦„,, ': Y•�� ,�'+i 'y �' "ti i4tL�Stk'r• brr'� ri m 'X�Yy. arc r 'H i :!r : .^ d P M,. P l 't.:�� �i �n.'bd \a r b 4o"rR 4• tgt.. 4?••F,,t.,...- t ,�q�g r 7 ,1 r i :X�`'-!•`'.'';':"rl'i!' X+ �f° r•" • `T-wn�" '''t� :} F-';.5:::iY,;.A:� 's``yl�`ts•:•. f,.+I% 1 '4,'40: r r'� '.a Y wti ,'YI a \.� rr• q,.�.,.., •c^r�Rr•e:. c !j ','' 'a cY..:•I a. 1r s u` , 3 Fit£ v r ,... • 4 n Y }` Z il� � U� n ti/k p^ r F' 'r31,!,.4, u ty�,l���,Srl�1,114/41..yy '.✓.� ..i y .SL�w Y'4N�' •.�' �.' 1, {v�,>• 't\- ro •t•�`!'i.i.`�y;r EN�`I(d2. i%4_ •. RS ,! -`. �,4 y • .. tt-9 v'"SS,Y fly f•1' t.M! u t.„r r •N..i 9H;,1 • .<,.I ti. ;veC ;• i? ,, 16.,,,: '/#- . ,,• -.m a y •,a T' Y. ,:..a-. •1 R'.ie. �r:.c4?. `'a ,y i0,1 +:.i,.Xi4:14,F.':rt .�Q Q. ]L4 m ttx, "r'k ., q{)gr./'.10,i p 46,}, r�r A- .',,-Te •i••:'`F w7�.�; '�''A °'` ''-i �,.:er.'r:% '-R•i%p1L??s': i''.ny��� +:.Jv :+:°i�'c ',fi�.: t • • • \'•• n -.J :}.:.0,. tx A't � .•x 1 • S- wF.,,.� ^,•�`R•'/.r ;w•.•.wi�_.... �.. •• :. .,.,••� Y,•::.`/ 'M r• P,,•i! pel. ;.•;1•••••••'.44i.'S'•;';'"i4A4tk-4:'•''"141:4-54, • 4. a.. t4W. .it . . .4..1 .:Pt,. hy' , • .i , 10c-5 o—..Du— l'uu 4: 1�1-1.1 r F'CUI'I JI.L O I / L�1 r_J I / I-'- .i ,i j 1 1 I"1 I . ! .J _- 5 -r ;''LA SVPFrS! -'-4-�C� . . .3 A 44-10-. i Par,„ A 4 —S % - ‹, la . oar" .. . , - Asp-. - :.5 - nu' - '1-`-`-i' , --°°, } -. 41,\, . li* , \ . .. . .;„ ,,,.: : . \ •' ��" ''�' '2 �� =i'`c'F'.� � t -, � cam--�� i-\ • Ier ----- ....* Ki..... , '') .- . . .- --:. .:- . \-1) : ' -) , . 2_ ;'___% II ( KA-VO) .egArg-V2;4c-1 7 \... i . ,I is. . .3„..,,. c..._, . .i / . 4 AF420.,..,s. 1 itV. r..-Kr) Ce;?,d., I N � � :V ' I • W,t �?a A 50P=—E --. Y1k • • e t•l 1V. 02ir4- D r-fGE. Bill ID! f•t.CI *9 97 . I+T'6 'uc "-: i-�>;• ,�. '.:ram `"'ice-�-:�:.:i - • • : . • .- -• or'. �' /1 -r— -- 4,.•o. .i. ) 10C-6 .:7414.f.'...210;"..w... :v.—,....p,„, qv-"1....-„,"tw.lra• ...7. 0 ;141$P4'''''vrk t.•7;'•:. .' » � �., , 6 . al S....! 4"' ^R i� +FT _ Yt .� l i• ,+may,k ri 4 c f"� S CNI 4:74 Thl � '��„r xr "�=s ,.i `�• N " -'` y' � ,;°,i' F �INM,j , 04` dveA.- 1;;'''A, rs, '1 Al", -r„ .m , '�'+4 CO '-•', art n' ,-9'i.' '" eitt - '' '4s 2� _ ) Ir g ��a,% an W "�'" ' ,p7 � .3k-'.Y ('i '.ti —,2a'R`-{` �d tn ,3`"f.✓�' "�f ° C' 6 r-,, c3� ..4 acts..ig. . x* ,-. 2 ,,;,.. rL Y ,,.64.f ; j -y,, fya {i - .- i,.. :...-Ld?� n. . e$xr.. .. ,�,A yt; `d.&_i.:`" `. I iY &w4 is .: X --",,V-ler il'..:''.''',-;44.;* ,1!-. ..,,.44", :.4. ',',,,N,;,,0_j..,:,..,..0 . ,., x xftk co . {�. is •.• x �, �,., x .- ~ ••n,n.• ,i t., i aces'. "3s • ,.` r a .t` cp **00044.11144VAF'4441:, fir r _ :fir r Fi —! C� 6BBl * } f�L r��CoE fph' 3 :.a'' ? # • , �w , � 'mom ,„ a • .a 1 .. • ..14.s•c;,..:.••,:lje..?•,. ...:',,...,,-, ..,:. -...dge...frx44,• 4,, a-,.-,-;_:. .p.-. „sli,if., • Ir Y } L m-rases, '. "'{✓,r } (s "a ;J ' 41•gyf`r,4" & -,, t y ma 3 . r • .d.� *�`.c. I ORDINANCE NO. 704-A SIGN ORDINANCE SEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS B. MONUMENT SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all monument signs which are allowed under this ordinance. 2. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6)inches. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Four (4) feet, excluding monument base and sign structure. The monument base may be an additional eighteen (18) inches in height measured from ground level at the center of the base to the top of the base. The sign structure shall not exceed five(5) feet. 4. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred (100) square feet per sign with a maximum area per sign face of fifty (50) square feet. The maximum area for the sign structure shall not exceed seventy (70) square feet (see Appendix'A'for measurement criteria). 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one monument sign, excluding menuboard signs, shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. Monument signs may be no closer than five hundred(500) feet on any one site. 6. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 7. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: All monument sign bases shall be constructed of the same masonry material as the front building facade on the same site or shall be stone or brick. The sign structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal building, or stone, or brick. Sculpted aluminum sign panels will be allowed. All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited to a minimum of six(6)inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. 8. ILLUMINATION: Monument signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting for sculpted aluminum panels or a ground lighting source where the light itself and supporting structure are not visible from public R.O.W. 10C-8 City of Southlake, Texas 1 STAFF REPORT July 13, 2000 PROJECT: Noise Ordinance Amendment ORDINANCE NO: 480-KK REQUEST: Discuss an amendment to Ordinance No. 480, intended to remove the general noise regulations from the zoning ordinance and replacing them with appropriate references to Ordinance No. 778. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Discuss Ordinance No. 480-KK ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Ordinance No. 480-KK STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy (Ext. 743) Ordinance No. Agenda Item 480-KK 11 A City of Southlake, Texas 4 MEMORANDUM July 7, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Art Wright, Zoning Assistant, ext. 828 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-KK regarding noise provisions in the Zoning Ordinance Action Requested: Discussion of proposed Ordinance No. 480-KK regarding noise regulations in the zoning ordinance. Background Information: The Building Department proposes Noise Ordinance No. 778 to replace the current noise/nuisance ordinance. The purpose of the new ordinance is to establish measurable and enforceable criteria with respect to noise to provide for the protection of the residents and the enjoyment of their property from auditory nuisances. As a result of these changes, an amendment of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is necessary to remove the general noise regulations from the zoning ordinance and replace them with appropriate references to Ordinance No. 778. Attached is a draft of Ordinance No. 480-KK, which provides for the necessary changes to the zoning ordinance. Legal Reviews: The City Attorney's office has reviewed the current draft. Financial Considerations: Not applicable. Alternatives: May recommend such changes or conditions to the ordinance as deemed appropriate. Supporting Documents: Proposed Ordinance No. 480-KK Staff Recommendation: Present to the City Council on July 18, 2000 for discussion and Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration on July 20, 2000. Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment A 480-KK 11A Page 1 I CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-KK AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480,AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; REVISING CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING NOISE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS,the City has adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents by amending Ordinance No. 480 as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 24.10, 26.8, and 27.8 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, are hereby amended by revising paragraph (a) thereof, respectively, to read as follows: "a. Noise. All uses or activities conducted within this zoning classification shall conform to the maximum noise levels and requirements of the current noise ordinance, as amended." Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment B 480-KK 11A Page 1 I SECTION 2. Section 40.4c of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph 4 thereof to read as follows: "4. The impact of noise, glare from vehicular or stationary lights, or any other applicable performance standards on adjacent properties, as determined by any reports or studies which may be reasonably required to determine compliance with these applicable performance standards." SECTION 3. Section 43.13 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph (j), to read as follows: "j. Noise: Noise levels shall comply with the requirements of the current noise ordinance, as amended." SECTION 4. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by deleting the definition of decibel. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment B 480-KK 11A Page 2 1 would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning yard regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof SECTION 10. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment B 480-KK 11A Page 3 ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment B 480-KK 11 A Page 4 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Ordinance No. Agenda Item Attachment B 480-KK 11A Page 5 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 14, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 778, Noise Ordinance discussion. Action Requested: City Council discussion of proposed Ordinance No. 778,Noise Ordinance. Background Information: This ordinance was originally adopted in June 1988 as a "nuisance" ordinance. For the purposes of explanation, both the existing and the proposed ordinances will be referred to as "noise" ordinances to avoid confusion. During the past several years, the city responded to several noise complaint situations and both the police services and code enforcement experienced some difficulty in resolving the complaints for several reasons under the existing ordinance. For example, provisions exist in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance that permit activity in conflict with the existing noise ordinance. The existing ordinance also relies heavily on subjective judgement that mandates a much greater degree of evidentiary support than can typically be achieved for successful prosecution. The Southlake Department of Public Safety conducted extensive research, including contacting the Rutgers Noise Technical Assistance Center, located in the Department of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers University. In the development of this ordinance, we incorporated both objective standards and subjective provisions within the ordinance to maximize the application and enforcement capabilities. We now seek input from the City Council regarding this proposed ordinance. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: We have discussed the general issues with several persons in Myers Meadows as a result of the recent Tetco noise complaint. In addition, we have submitted a draft copy to the SPIN group representatives and several developers for their input and comment. A copy has also been forwarded to DFW airport at their request. No other formal group input has been received. Pending direction from the City Council, we will bring this issue before the P&Z to modify the wording in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to refer to compliance with the "Noise Ordinance" in much the same manner as we did with the recent lighting ordinance. This item is not subject to any Board review. 11A-1 • Billy Campbell July 14, 2000 Page 2 Legal Review: This ordinance was reviewed by City Attorney D'Ann Drennan, who has approved the ordinance under discussion by City Council. Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. 778 Comparative Sound Chart Information Staff Recommendation: Place draft Ordinance No. 778, Noise Ordinance, on the July 18, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for discussion. GW/mwj 11A-2 ORDINANCE NO. 778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BY ADDING ARTICLE III TO DEFINE CERTAIN NOISES TO BE A NUISANCE AND PROHIBITING THEM; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 306, 424, AND 435; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the city council recognizes that some noises are of such volume, intensity or duration as to constitute a danger to the physical health of persons or a breach of the peace, quiet, and solitude to which citizens are entitled; and WHEREAS, the city council declares such noises to be a nuisance and desires to prohibit such nuisances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION (a) That Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by adding Article III, which shall read as follows: "III. NOISE NUISANCES. Sec. 11-60. Definitions. All terms not defined in this Article shall be in conformance with the applicable publications of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or its successor body. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. (1) A-weighted Sound Level means the sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted network. The sound pressure level so read is designated in dB(A) or dBA. (2) Clearly Audible means sound that can be heard without the assistance of any device. N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 1 11A-3 (3) Commercial means property used for purposes other than residential or agricultural regardless of whether the property has a commercial zoning designation. (4) Construction means any phase of the on-site erection or removal, including, but not limited to, excavation, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or structure conducted on that site. (5) Daytime means the daylight hours from one-half hour before sunrise to one- half hour after sunset with exact times of sunrise and sunset as designated by the U.S. Naval Observatory for this regional time zone. (6) Decibel (dB) means a unit of sound pressure level on a logarithmic scale measured relative to the threshold of audible sound by the human ear, in compliance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard S1.1-1960, or the successor thereto. (7) Director means the Director of the Southlake Department of Public Safety or the Director's authorized representative. (8) Immediate Vicinity means any distance within 100 feet of the noise source, or any area within the property line of the parcel or lot upon which the source of noise is emanating, whichever is the greater distance from the noise source (9) Nighttime means the dark hours from one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise with exact times of sunrise and sunset as designated by the U.S. Naval Observatory for this regional time zone. (10) Noise means any sound which annoys or disturbs humans or which causes or tends to cause an adverse psychological or physiological effect on humans. (11) Person means any individual, corporation, business or other entity. (12) Repetitive incident of noise means a recurrence of any sound from the same source which repeats itself three or more times per day, whether at routine cyclical periods or random periods. (13) Residential means any property used for temporary or permanent dwelling purposes. (14) Sound means the weighted sound pressure level obtained by the use of a sound level meter and frequency weighting network as specified in ANSI specifications for sound level meters. When the frequency weighting employed is not indicated, the A-weighting shall apply. (15) Sound pressure means the instantaneous difference between the actual pressure and the average or barometric pressure at a given point in space, as produced by sound energy. N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 2 11A-4 (16) Sound pressure level means 20 times the logarithm to the base ten of the ratio of the RMS sound pressure to the reference pressure of twenty (20) micropascals. This Sound Pressure Level is expressed in Decibels. Sec. 11-61. Offenses. (a) Tampering with Sound Instrument. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove or render inaccurate or inoperative any sound level meter or any similar monitoring instrument or device positioned for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Article. It shall be unlawful for any person to provide false readings of any sound instrument. (b) Noise Nuisance. A person shall not create, assist in creating, permit or continue any excessive or unnecessary noise of a volume, intensity, or duration that is clearly audible and disturbs, annoys, or endangers the calm, comfort, quiet, repose, health, peace or safety of persons of ordinary sensibilities beyond the immediate vicinity of the noise. Such noise shall be a violation of this Article. (c) Prima Facie Violation. The following acts of noise are prima facie evidence of a violation of this Article: (1) Permitting an unreasonably loud, harsh, or prolonged sounding of any horn, alarm, or other signal device on any vehicle, unless: (i) necessary to ensure safe operation as authorized by state law, or (ii) caused by mechanical failure beyond the operator's control and the operator takes all reasonable measures to stop the noise made by the horn, alarm, or other device. (2) Playing or use of any sound producing or amplifying device, speaker, or instrument, including a musical instrument, in such a manner or in such loud volume or intensity, at any time or place, so as to disturb, destroy, or endanger the peace, comfort, repose, or rest of persons of ordinary sensibilities beyond the immediate vicinity of the noise or disturbance or when such noise exceeds the dBA levels shown in Table 1. (3) Creating a loud noise or disturbance in or with a motor vehicle or any appurtenance to such vehicle, including without limitation, a bed, trailer, or other equipment connected in any manner to the vehicle, so as to disturb, destroy, endanger the peace, comfort, repose or rest of persons of ordinary sensibilities beyond the immediate vicinity of the source of the noise. (4) Operating a motor vehicle that is not equipped with a muffler in good working order and in use at all times. (5) Using any mechanical device operated by compressed air, unless the noise is effectively muffled and reduced to the dBA levels shown in Table 1. (6) Permitting any loud, harsh, or prolonged sounding of any burglar or fire alarm or other distress signal on any dwelling, commercial building, or other premises, unless: (a) authorized by law, or (b) caused by mechanical failure N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 3 11A-5 beyond the operator's control and the operator takes all reasonable measures to stop the noise made by the alarm or other device. (7) Operating any heavy equipment, machinery or apparatus used in any exterior or outdoor construction, repair, remodeling, demolition, drilling, excavation, grading, earth moving, paving, cement laying or pouring, or other work of any nature during the nighttime or anytime on Sunday within 1,000 feet of any residential property. (8) Creating any loud or raucous noise within 1,000 lineal feet of any school building or court that is in session or adjacent to any hospital building or similar care facility, provided that conspicuous signs located on the premises identify the premises. (9) Operating, as a part of any business, any equipment or machinery, including, but not limited to, combustion engines, fans, blowers, grinders, welders, loaders, washers, winches, lifts, and hoists, whether independent or attached to a motor vehicle, during the nighttime within 1,000 lineal feet of any residential dwelling which equipment or machinery is clearly audible and disturbs, annoys, or endangers the calm, comfort, quiet, repose, health, peace or safety of persons of a reasonable and prudent person of ordinary sensibilities. (10) Discharging into the open air the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine, or motor vehicle engine or boat engine, except through a muffler or other device which will effectively prevent loud or explosive noises therefrom. (11) Conducting any commercial or industrial trash or waste pickup within 1,000 lineal feet of any residential dwelling during the nighttime. (12) Conducting or permitting any activity that produces a dBA level beyond the immediate vicinity that exceeds the dBA levels specified in Table 1. TABLE 1 PRIMA FACIE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE LEVELS Property receiving sound Daytime Nighttime Sundays Residential 60 dBA 55 dBA 55 dBA Commercial 70 dBA 65 dBA 65 dBA Sec. 11-62. Exceptions. The following activities are exempt from the provisions of this Article: (1) Emergency work immediately necessary to restore property to a safe condition following a fire, accident or natural disaster, to restore public utilities, or to protect persons or property from imminent danger; N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Paae 4 11A-6 (2) Sounds made to alert persons to the existence of an emergency, an imminent danger, or an attempted crime; (3) Parades, concerts, festivals, fairs or similar activities specifically approved by the City Council or sponsored by or on behalf of a governmental body; (4) Athletic, musical, or cultural activities or events, including practices and rehearsals, conducted by or under the auspices of public or private schools; (5) Sound created by animals or livestock kept or maintained by persons on agriculturally zoned parcels which exceed 10 acres in size; (6) Sounds created while conducting yard work or lawn maintenance during the daytime, including, but not limited to, lawn mowing, leaf blowing, brush clearing, and use of chain saws; (7) Sounds created as a part of new construction, remodeling or maintenance activities on a building or structure during the daytime; (8) Sounds authorized under a temporary noise exemption permit as provided in this Article; (9) Sounds created during construction, maintenance, or repairs conducted by or on behalf of a governmental entity providing basic utility services or roadway projects approved by the City Council; (10) Sounds created by agricultural operations when such operations are related to activities directly associated with agricultural business, including raking, baling, plowing, planting, harvesting, milking, feeding, and mowing; and (11) Sounds created by typical roadway noises from traffic flow. Sec. 11-63. Temporary Noise Exemption Permits (a) Permit generally. A person may apply for a permit to engage in any activity that creates a noise that would otherwise constitute a nuisance or be a violation of this Article. A person must apply in writing to the Director at least ten calendar days prior to the requested issuance date and time, unless the Director determines that unforeseeable circumstances justify a shorter amount of time. (b) Application for permit. The application for a permit shall be on a form prescribed by the Director and must include the following: (1) the name, address, and telephone number of the applicant for both daytime and nighttime contact; (2) a description of the type, duration, and location of the noise, specifically including the date and time the noise will occur; (3) the reason the noise level is expected to exceed the provisions of this Article; N:\DPSWDMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 5 11A-7 (4) the name, if different from the applicant, of the owner of the property on which the noise will occur and a written letter of permission from the owner and any tenants or other persons occupying the property from which the noise will occur; (5) a statement from the applicant that all property owners contiguous to the property upon which the noise originates will be provided written notification within 24 hours of making the application of their right to respond directly to the Director to voice support or opposition to the application; and (6) a copy of the notification(s) sent to any such property owners. (c) Filing fee. A filing fee must be submitted with the application for a permit, in an amount prescribed in a fee schedule adopted by the City Council, or $25 in the absence of such fee schedule. No such fees shall be assessed to any governmental entity or any person conducting activities on behalf of the governmental entity. (d) Duration of permit. The duration of such permit shall not exceed two (2) calendar days. (e) Grounds for granting or denying permit. In determining whether to grant or deny the permit, the Director may consider the following factors, among others: (1) the safety of the persons that will be subjected to the noise, whether voluntarily or involuntarily; (2) the number of persons that will be involuntarily subjected to the noise; (3) the reasonableness of the time, place, and manner of the noise and the duration of the noise; and (4) any other factors necessary to determine the impact on the public health or safety and the disruption of the peace that the noise may cause. (f) Notice of Director's decision. The Director shall, within five calendar days following the date of the application, notify the applicant of the Director's decision either to grant or deny the permit. If the Director denies the permit, the Director shall state the reasons for the denial in a written notice provided to the applicant. If the Director grants the permit, the Director may place reasonable time, place, and other restrictions on the activity authorized by the permit. (g) Appeal. Upon receiving such notice from the Director, the applicant may appeal the Director's decision, including restrictions placed on the activity authorized by the permit, to the city manager. Within one working day of receiving the appeal, the city manager shall consider the application, the basis of denial, or any restrictions placed on issuance of the permit. Based on standards stated in subsection (e) of this section, the city manager may: (1) uphold the decision of the Director; (2) approve or deny the issuance of the permit as applied for; or (3) modify or delete restrictions placed on the permit. N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 6 11A-8 (h) Permit. The permit shall be in a form prescribed by the Director and shall be displayed in the immediate vicinity of the source of the noise at all times during the commission of the noise. The permit shall include the following: (1) the date and time that the permit shall begin and end; (2) the name of the permit holder and who will be generating the noise; (3) a description of the basic nature of the noise; (4) the specific location of the noise; and (5) any special limitations or restrictions placed on the permit. Sec. 11-64. Variances. The City Council may authorize a variance to any restriction set forth in this Article or any other aspect involved in the permitting process. Before granting a variance, the City Council must determine that a literal enforcement of this Article would create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this Article. A person may request a variance from this Article by filing the request with the City Secretary. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council, or $100 in the absence of such fee schedule. SECTION 2 REPEAL Ordinance Nos. 306, 424 and 435 are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION 3 CUMULATIVE This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinance, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4 SEVERABLE It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL100718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 7 11A-9 • SECTION 5 PENALTY Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense related to public health and sanitation, and Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for any other offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6 SAVINGS All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provision of any other ordinances affecting nuisances caused by noise that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 7 PUBLICATION The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice sitting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 8 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 8 11A-10 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney N:\DPS\ADMINISTRATION\BOBBYE SHIRE\WORD FILES\CITYCOUNCIL\00718NOISE-ORDINANCE.DOC(6-30-00) Page 9 11A-11 Comparative Sound Chart Information Chart Source: Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety as provided by Mrs. Stan Key of Meyer's Meadows Subdivision Noise Source Sound Pressure Level, dB (decibel) Pneumatic Chipper at 5 feet distance 112 dB Garbage Disposal at 3 feet distance 80 dB Passenger car 50 mph at 50 feet distance 65 dB Conversation at 3 feet distance 60 dB Quiet room 40 dB Chart Source: National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Noise Source Sound Pressure Level, dB (decibel) Lawn Mower 96 dB Food Blender 88 dB Typical living room music 76 dB Typical television/radio 70 dB Conversation 60 dB Bird Calls 44 dB Normal breathing 10 dB Local Readings Taken with Sound Meter Noise Source Sound Pressure Level Notations "dB" (decibel) Killdeer Ct. 52 dB No traffic Killdeer Ct. 67 dB Traffic sounds • Town square fountain 62 dB 5 feet distance Town square pavilion 65 dB No traffic/Water sprays on lake Tetco 1709/Peytonville 55 dB No traffic/No car wash Davis Blvd Car Wash 57 dB No traffic/No car wash Scooters 114/Kimball 62 dB No traffic/No car wash Tetco 1709/Peytonville 69 dB Traffic sounds Davis Blvd Car Wash 68 dB Traffic sounds Scooters 114/Kimball 69 dB Traffic sounds Tetco 1709/Peytonville 58 dB Car wash at residential property Davis Blvd Car Wash 69 dB Car wash at commercial property Scooters 114/Kimball 74 dB Car wash at commercial property • 11A-12