Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2002-06-04 CC Meeting
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 4,2002 LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas Council Chambers in Town Hall WORK SESSION: 5:30 to 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 P.M. or Immediately Following the Work Session 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.086. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held, under these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. 1. Section 551.071 Consultation with City Attorney a. Seek advice of city attorney regarding employee benefits. b. Seek the advice of the attorney regarding Pinnacle Integrated Technologies, Inc. c. Seek the advice of the attorney regarding Botanical Technologies, Inc. d. Update on pending and/or contemplated lawsuits. 2. Section 551.086 Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations a. Economic incentives for businesses. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 3. INVOCATION: Chaplain of the month, Keith Luttrell, Southlake Church 4. REPORTS: A. Mayor's Report 1. Presentation: Communicator Award of Distinction for Government newsletter 2. Presentation by Texas Forestry Service: Tree City USA 3. Robb Wasielewski, President of Northeast Arts Council B. City Manager's Report • City of Southlake City Council Meeting Agenda June 4,2002 Page 2 of 4 C. SPIN Report D. Library Board Report E. Committee Reports F. Local Business Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consent: A. Approval of the minutes of the City Council meeting held on May 21, 2002. B. ZA02-043, Development Plan for Southlake Town Square, Phase IV, located on the east side of Central Avenue,north side of E. Southlake Boulevard and the south side of State Highway 114. Current Zoning: NR-PUD Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. TABLED' TO THE JUNE 18, 2002, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-399, 2nd Reading (ZA02-034) Rezoning and Site Plan for Sonic Restaurant, at 2550 East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) located on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), approximately 600' west of N. Nolen Drive. Current Zoning: AG - Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: S-P-1 - Detailed Site Plan District with C-2 - Local Retail Commercial District uses. SPIN Neighborhood#7. PUBLIC HEARING B. Ordinance No. 810-A, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 810, amending FY2001-02 budget. PUBLIC HEARING C. Ordinance No. 805-A, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 805, agreement with the Municipal Judge. PUBLIC HEARING 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-275a, 1st Reading (ZA01-124) Rezoning and Concept Plan for Remington Retirement Community located on the south side of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), south of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and West Jellico Circle. Current Zoning: S-P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, and (senior) multi- • City of Southlake City Council Meeting Agenda June 4,2002 Page 3 of 4 family residential uses. Requested Zoning: S-P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, (senior) multi-family residential and (senior) two-family residential uses. SPIN Neighborhood #15. (If approved on first reading, Public Hearing will be held on June 18, 2002) B. Ordinance No. 480-224a, 1st Reading(ZA02-042) Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Southlake Town Square, located on the south side of State Highway 114, north side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and east side of North Carroll Avenue. Current Zoning: NR-PUD Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District. Requested Zoning: NR-PUD Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. (If approved on first reading, Public Hearing will be held on June 18, 2002) 9. Resolutions: (no items for this agenda) 10. Other items for consideration: A. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Cooper and Stebbins, Southlake Town Square West Side District. 11. Other items for discussion: (no items for this agenda) 12. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at Town Hall, 1400 Main Street, Southlake, °Te i xas c•0,�Friday, May 31, 2002, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Clta�3tsQ:011,f-��,,�, • Kim ush • • • • Ac 'ng City Secretary * o,* 6i,`-,°°°°°°� 00000 If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that_requires special needs,please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 817-481-1490 and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City of Southlake City Council Meeting Agenda June 4,2002 Page 4 of 4 EXECUTIVE SESSION SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and contemplated litigation, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Hanson Aggregate Central,Inc., vs. City of Southlake. October 2000. 2. Marcus Taylor vs. City of Southlake and TRI DAL, LTD. March 2001. 3. City of Southlake vs. Timarron et.al. May 2001. 4. Oakmont Enterprises, Inc., vs. City of Southlake, and Sabre, Inc. January 2002. 5. Leona and Raymond Fox vs. City of Southlake. April 2002. 6. Dana C. Kalal vs. Department of Public Works City of Southlake. April 2002. 7. David A. Gray vs. City of Southlake. April 2002. SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City. SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. SECTION 551.086 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS The City Council may discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information received from a business prospect that the city seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the city and which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect as described above. City of Southlake CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 21, 2002 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy, Mayor Pro Tern W. Ralph Evans, Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Greg Standerfer; Councilmembers: Carolyn Morris, Rex Potter, Keith Shankland, and Tom Stephen. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Billy Campbell, Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton, Assistant to the City Manager John Eaglen, Community Services Director Kevin Hugman, Deputy Director of Community Services Steve Polasek, Planner Chris Carpenter, Human Resources Director Harold Cates, Finance Director Sharen Elam, Planning Director Bruce Payne, Senior Planner Dennis Killough, Senior Planner Ken Baker, Public Works Director Pedram Farahnak, Senior Engineer Charlie Thomas, Assistant to the Public Works Director Valerie Bradley, Director of Economic Development Greg Last, Economic Specialist Betsy Boyett, Director of Public Safety Rick Black, Police Chief Marlin Price, Public Information Officer James Kunke, City Attorney E. Allen Taylor, Administrative Secretary Lori Farwell and Acting City Secretary Kim Bush. WORK SESSION: The work session was called to order by Mayor Stacy at 5:41 p.m. REGULAR SESSION: Agenda Item No. 1, Call to order. The regular session was called to order by Mayor Stacy at 5:51 p.m. Agenda Item No. 2A, Executive Session: Mayor Stacy announced that the City Council would be going into Executive Session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Section 551.071, consultation with city attorney; Section 551.072, deliberation regarding real property; Section 551.074, deliberation regarding personnel matters; Section 551.086, deliberation regarding economic development negotiations. City Council adjourned for Executive Session at 5:52 p.m. Mayor Stacy called the executive session to order at 6:06 p.m. Agenda Item No. 2B, Reconvene: Executive Session ended at 7:10 p.m. and City Council reconvened the regular meeting at 7:13 p.m. There was no action necessary as a result of the Executive Session. Agenda Item No. 3, Invocation was presented by Coy Quesenbury of Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. Agenda Item No. 4, Reports: A. Mayor's Report: Mayor Stacy announced upcoming meetings and events. B. City Manager's Report: Fort Worth Star Telegram Columnist Dave Lieber presented to the Southlake Department of Public Safety a second place trophy for the miniature golf competition sponsored by Mr. Lieber to raise funds for the children's Summer Santa program. C. SPIN Report: SPIN Representative Al Morin informed the Council that they have reviewed their budget and asked that Council give whatever consideration possible for.funding the SPIN program. He also stated that SPIN will be making an effort to become more visible in the community by participating in the July 4 and Octoberfest festivals. UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 1 of 9 D. Parks and Recreation Report: Park Board member Tim O'Conner updated the Council on recent recommendations made by the Board including applying for a grant for trails at Bob Jones Park. E. Committee Reports: None F. Art in the Square Report: Event organizer Sherry Witt reported that the festival had an estimated 55,000 in attendance and raised an estimated $118,000 for local charities. G. Local Business Report: Directof Cecilia Chambers of The Children's Courtyard made a brief presentation concerning their facility. Consent Agenda Items: A. Approval of the minutes of the City Council meeting held on May 7, 2002, and of the Regular City Council meeting held on May 7, 2002. Approved clarifying the motion made on the consent agenda items. B. Approval of a Commercial Developer's Agreement for Gateway Church located in the 2100 block of East Southlake Boulevard across from Village Center. Staff recommends approving the standard developer's agreement. C. Resolution No. 02-039, Authorizing application for a Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPWD) Recreational Fund grant for Bob Jones Park trails. Staff recommends authorizing an application to the Texas Parks and Wildlife. If the grant is received, TPWD will reimburse the City for 80% of the construction cost. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "APPLICANT," DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE "APPLICANT" IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "DEPARTMENT," FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TEXAS RECREATIONAL TRAILS GRANT PROGRAM, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "PROGRAM;" CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" MATCHING SHARE IS READILY AVAILABLE; AND DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR PERMANENT PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATIONAL USES. D. Ordinance No. 480-275a, 1st Reading (ZA01-124) Rezoning and Concept Plan for Remington Retirement Community located on the south side of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), south of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and West Jellico Circle. Current Zoning: S- P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, and(senior) multi-family residential uses. Requested Zoning: S-P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, (senior) multi-family residential and (senior) two-family residential uses. Tabled at the request of the applicant to the June 4, 2002, City Council meeting. E. ZA01-125, Site Plan for Remington Retirement Community located on the south side of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), south of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and West Jellico Circle. Current Zoning: S-P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 2 of 9 care facility, nursing care facility, and (senior) multi-family residential uses. Proposed Zoning: S-P-2 - Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, (senior) multi- family residential and (senior) two-family residential uses. Tabled at the request of the applicant to the June 18, 2002, City Council meeting. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-398, 1st Reading (ZA02-018) Rezoning and Concept Plan for Cornerstone Business Park, being approximately 9.3 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Crooked Lane and S. Nolen Drive. Current Zoning: 0-1 - Office District and I-1 - Light Industrial District. Requested Zoning: I-1 - Light Industrial District. Tabled at the request of the applicant to the June 18, 2002, City Council meeting. 8D. Ordinance No. 810-A, 1st Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 810, amending FY2001-02 budget. Staff recommends amending the FY2001-02 budget by decreasing revenues and expenditures by $381,638 and $680,581, respectively. 8E. Ordinance No. 805-A, 1st Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 805, agreement with the Municipal Judge. Staff recommends approving the ordinance which will amend the professional services agreement with Municipal Judge Carol Montgomery to enable her to participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System at a cost of$4,300 annually to the City. Motion was made to approve consent agenda items 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D (to table), 5E (to table), 8A (to table), 8D, and 8E as discussed tonight and presented above. Motion: Standerfer • Second: Evans Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 Agenda Item No. 6A. Public Forum. Ross Martin III, 1347 Woodbrook Court, Southlake. Mr. Martin presented to the Council a petition from the Cross Timber Hills Subdivision residents. Mr. Martin stated that residents are requesting that the City honor its previously made commitments to restore the neighborhood to its status prior to undertaking the neighborhood sewer program by making provisions in the budget to repair and repave the streets in the subdivision. He further commented that damage to road surfaces occurred during the construction period from July 2000 through February 2002. Other persons present at the meeting and completing a public comment form in support of the request included: Barbara Atkins, Meda Payne, and Jackie Phillips. • Julie Bustamante, 1501 Plantation Drive. Ms. Bustamante, on behalf of the neighborhoods surrounding North Peytonville Road, requested that the Council consider providing funds in the budget to provide a side walk along North Peytonville. She presented to the Council a binder including pictures showing the narrow, dangerous condition of the road. Mayor Stacy commented that North Peytonville is scheduled for reconstruction and requested that Public Works Director Pedram Farahnak include in the bid request a proposal for the construction of sidewalks. Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 480-NN, 2°a Reading, Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Sections 29 "MH—Manufactured Housing" district, Section 34 "Accessory Uses" and Section 44 "Board of Adjustments." Senior Planner Dennis Killough explained that since UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 3 of 9 Council's approval on first reading, the applicant submitted a letter requesting to withdrawal all language change requests except for those dealing with front and side yard requests. Councilmember Standerfer stated that after consultation with our City Attorney, he would make a motion to remand the MH portion of Ordinance No. 480 back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a comprehensive study. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter City Attorney Allen Taylor clarified that Councilmember Standerfer does not want to take action on this item. He is recommending sending back to the P&Z for a comprehensive study of the entire chapter on MH- manufactured housing and all the regulations related thereto rather than consider this one piece element. He commented that persons wishing to speak on this item will have an opportunity.to do so when P&Z holds its public hearing. Motion was amended to take no action and table this request until the second meeting in July. Motion: Standerfer Second: Shankland Motion was repeated in its entirety as follows: Motion was made to take no action on the application tonight with respect to the setbacks, to remand the MH portion of Ordinance No. 480 to P&Z for a comprehensive review, and to table the applicant's request to the second meeting in July. Motion: Standerfer Second: Shankland • Ayes: Evans, Morris, Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: None Approve: 7-0 Rick Wilhelm, attorney representing David McMahan, commented that they have met all requirements and have already received approval from P&Z. He commented that to delay action may well be in violation of state law. City Attorney Allen Taylor explained that the applicant has made a significant change to their original request and staff has not had an opportunity to review. The Planning and Zoning Commission is charged with making recommendations and as discussed there are inherent inconsistencies in the ordinance that would require variances. It would appear quite appropriate to let the Planning and Zoning Commission review the ordinance and make a recommendation to the City Council. Mayor Stacy commented that several residents completed a public comment form including: those in favor— Teresa and Stephen Baker, Andrew and Lynn Vichayanonda, Stephen Nelson, Bill and Jane Ervin, Penney Day, Debbie and Darrell Mayhew, and Frances Meeker; those in opposition — Sue Johnson, Richard Sandow, and Bob Bonchak; those undisclosed — Melanie Bell, James Anderson, and Donald Anderson. ' • Donald Anderson, 1205 Province, Southlake. Mr. Anderson commented that not everyone in Southlake makes the same amount of money. His family lives in manufactured housing and they want the same things for their family as any other resident in Southlake. UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 4 of 9 Sue Johnson, 308 Lakeside Court, Southlake. Ms. Johnson stated that while P&Z is looking at the ordinance, she would request they look at a notification requirement that would address somekind of notification when a developer requests to modify a City ordinance. Agenda Item No. 7B. Resolution No. 02-040 (ZA02-045) Specific Use Permit for Southlake Town Square Farmer's Market, on property described as Southlake Town Square, Phase I, and being 42.013 acres located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). Current Zoning: NR-PUD Non-Residential Planned Unit Development to include C-3 - General Commercial District uses. Senior Planner Dennis Killough presented the request for outdoor vendor sales for a Farmer's Market in temporary or moveable structures per the Southlake Town Square NRPUD Ordinance No. 480-224, Section d.2. Applicant Nancy Harmon was present to answer questions for the Council. She stated that sales would be limited to fresh fruits, vegetables, and herbs, plants, and homemade gourmet salsas, honey,jams, etc. She explained that it would only be on Saturdays until September 28. Council discussed concerns with taking up parking spaces and taking sales away from other stores in the area. Public Hearing: Maria Chase, 600 Cherry Court, Southlake. Ms. Chase commented that she had concerns with the request because it will not be bringing in any funds to the City and she has a concern with the litter that will be generated. There were no other comments from the audience during the Public Hearing. Motion was made to deny Resolution No. 02-040 (ZA 02-045), SUP for a Farmers Market. Motion: Stephen Second: Morris Ayes: Morris, Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Stephen Nays: Standerfer,Evans Approved(to deny) 5-2 Prior to discussion of the next item, several persons from the audience came forward to express their concern about the number of people present who wanted to address item 7A regarding manufactured housing. Mayor Stacy commented that the applicant had changed his request and at this time, they should discuss their concerns with the applicant. Agenda Item No. 8B. Ordinance No. 480-399, 1st Reading (ZA02-034) Rezoning and Site Plan for Sonic Restaurant, at 2550 East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) located on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), approximately 600' west of N. Nolen Drive. Current Zoning: AG - Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: S-P-1 - Detailed Site Plan District with C-2 - Local Retail Commercial District. uses. Senior Planner Dennis Killough presented Ordinance No. 480-399 and commented that P&Z recommended approval at its meeting on May 9, 2002 (4-2) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3, 2002. Applicant Dennis Clark was present to answer questions from the Council. Council recommended that the applicant pursue the possibility of a second access. UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 5 of 9 Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-399, 1st Reading, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3,2002. Motion: Standerfer Second: Evans Ayes: Evans,Morris, Potter, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: Shankland Approved: 6-1 Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA02-035, Plat Revision for Sonic Restaurant, at 2550 East Southlake Boulevard(FM 1709) located on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), approximately 600' west of N. Nolen Drive. Current Zoning: AG - Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: S-P-1 - Detailed Site Plan District with C-2 -Local Retail Commercial District uses. Senior Planner Dennis Killough presented ZA 02- 035 and stated that P&Z recommended approval at its meeting May 9, 2002, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3,2002. Motion was made to approve ZA 02-035 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated May 3, 2002 and subject to further limitations until approval of 2"d Reading on the rezoning. Motion: Standerfer Second: Evans Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: Shankland Approved: 6-1 Executive Session. Mayor Stacy announced that the City Council would be going back into Executive Session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Section 551.074, deliberation regarding personnel matters. City Council adjourned for Executive Session at 8:56 p.m. City Council reconvened at 9:53 p.m. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 02-028, Appointments to the Building Board of Appeals. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS; PROVIDING FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO.622; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Eddie Pierce to Place 4, Kosse Maykus to Place 2, and leave open alternate No. 1. . Motion: Evans Second: Standerfer Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 Agenda Item No. 9B. Resolution No. 02-029, Appointment to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee. Discussion of this appointment was held in open session. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 6 of 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP INITIATIVES FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL AWARENESS TO FILL AN EXPIRED TERM; AND PROVIDING AN'EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Brad Bartholomew. Motion: Potter Second: Shankand Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 Agenda Item 9C. Resolution No. 02-030, Appointment to the Joint Utilization Committee. Discussion of this appointment was held in open session. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE JOINT UTILIZATION COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Councilmember Standerfer and citizen appointment Jeff Wang. Motion: Potter Second: Stephen Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 Agenda Item No. 9D. Resolution No. 02-031, Appointments to the Library Board. It was noted that an appointment was also needed for the unexpired term of member Karen Cienke who recently resigned from the Board. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE LIBRARY BOARD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Angelique York to Place 1, Peggy Firestone to Place 2, C.D. Peebles to Place 3, and Andrea Curriri to Place 6. Motion: Standerfer Second: Stephen Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 Agenda Item No. 9E. Resolution No. 02-032, Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. Discussion of these appointments held in open session. Councilmember Shankland recommended Cara White,Lisa Stokdyk, Mary Georgia, and Richard Sandow. Councilmember Potter recommended Dorothy Wood, Eric Blomquist, Cara White, and Lisa Stokdyk. Councilmember Morris recommended Cara White, UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 7 of 9 Lisa Stokdyk, Dorothy Wood, and Eric Blomquist. Councilmember Standerfer recommended Mary Georgia, Eric Blomquist, Dorothy Wood, and Liz Durham. Councilmember Stephen recommended Eric Blomquist, Liz Durham, Dorothy Wood and Richard Sandow. Mayor Stacy recommended Dorothy White, Eric Blomquist, Mary Georgia, and Liz Durham. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Mary Georgia to Place 4, Eric Blomquist to Place 5, Dorothy Wood to Place 6, and Liz Durham to Place 7. Motion: Standerfer Second: Evans Ayes: Evans,Morris, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: Potter, Shankland Approved: 5-2 Agenda Item No. 9F. Resolution No. 02-033, Appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Vernon Stansell, John Terrell, Douglas Standley, and Ralph Williams. Motion: Evans Second: Standerfer Ayes: Evans, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: Morris,Potter, Shankland Approved: 5-3 Agenda Item No. 9G. Resolution No. 02-034, Appointments to the Senior Advisory Commission. Discussion on this item was in open session. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint Linda Moore, Jeane Alexander, William Cosgrove, and Connie Montague. Motion: Potter Second: Standerfer Ayes: Evans,Morris, Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 8 of 9 Agenda Item No. 9H. Resolution No. 02-035, Appointments to the Southlake Parks Development Corporation. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • Motion was made to appoint Councilmember Rex Potter, Mayor Rick Stacy, and citizen appointment Dorothy Wood. Motion: Standerfer ' Second: Stephen •Ayes: Evans, Morris, Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 • Agenda Item No. 9I. Resolution No. 02-036, Appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. In accordance with Section 4.21 of the City Charter, the caption for this item is listed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; • AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made to appoint John Reynal, Lewis Miltenberger, F.C. LeVrier to Alternate 1, and David Lambert to Alternate 2. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter • • • Ayes: Evans,Morris,Potter, Shankland, Stacy, Standerfer, Stephen Nays: none Approved: 7-0 • Agenda Item No. 12. Adjournment. There being no further business to discuss, the,meeting was adjourned at 10:12 p.m. • ATTEST: Mayor Rick Stacy • Kim Bush, Acting City Secretary • • UNOFFICIAL City Council Meeting'Minutes, May 21, 2002 Page 9 of 9 • City of Southia.ke Department of Planning . ..... . ...... ..... STAFF REPORT May 31, 2002 CASE NO: ZA02-034 PROJECT: Sonic Drive-In REQUEST: On behalf of Southlake Ventures,Encore Realty Company is requesting approval of rezoning and site plan request. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading for rezoning and site plan approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-399 ' (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner(481-2086) Case No. ZA02-034 p BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: .Southlake Ventures APPLICANT: Encore Realty Company, LC PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to place "Local Retail Commercial" district uses and regulations on the property for development of a drive-in restaurant and to fulfill the site plan approval requirements of the "Corridor Overlay Regulations" in order to receive a building permit for construction. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 2550 East Southlake Boulevard, which is on the north side of East Southlake Boulevard, approximately 1000' east of Kimball Avenue. To the north and east of this site is the Gateway Plaza, Phase II development., Bank of the West is located to the west. HISTORY: A previous application was made for the same request. The submittal was denied by the Planning & Zoning Commission on May 3, 2001. The case was withdrawn prior to reaching a City Council hearing. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1B1, W.E. Mayfield Subdivision and being .9451 acre. r 1 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: "AG"Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan district with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses limited to fast food restaurants. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way currently exists. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widened to a seven lane roadway (See Table #1). May`' 20U1 traffic counts on F M 1709'(betweenJE & K A S 114 imball - ,venue): Table#1 ( ) 24hr West Bound (WB) (22,828) East Bound (EB) (22,459) WB Peak A.M. (1,356) 11 - 1 2 Peak P.M. (2,104) 5 - 6 p.m. Case No. - Attachment A ZA02-034 Page 1 M NI; a.m. EB Peak A.M. (2,077) 7 - 8 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,462) 12 - 1 p.m. Proposed Circulation This plan does not propose any new driveway cuts onto East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). This site will share an existing drive with the property directly to the west (Bank of the West). The applicant is proposing to remove the existing median associated with this drive to improve access to the sites. This site will also have access to the Lowe's parking lot to the west via a 24' common access easement that runs parallel to Southlake Boulevard. A driver can access either Southlake Boulevard or Kimball Avenue from the Lowe's parking lot. Traffic Impact The normal hours of the proposed Sonic Restaurant are from 10 a.m. to 11p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 10 a.m. to 12 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The peak traffic hours of the Sonic restaurant are between 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. and 6 p.m. and 7 p.m. It is projected that during this peak _ time, the restaurant will generate approximately 80 vehicles for both peak periods. The restaurant is projected to generate an additional 460 vehicle trips per day. The Bank of the West generates approximately 800 vehicle trips per day. The peak traffic time for the bank and restaurant coincide during the early afternoon (See Table #2). Traffic Comparisons for Sonic and Bank of the West-Table#2 Sonic _.t Bank,of the West u.,,, Total VTPD 460 795 Peak Time VT 80 150 Peak Times 12pm -1 pm and 6pm-7pm 12:00 p.m. - 1 :00prn TRAIL PLAN: The proposed Southlake Pathways Master Plan indicates a"Program Paved Multi-use Trail" 8 ft. along the frontage of this site. The Community Services Department has indicated that the curve in the trail as shown on the site plan is too severe. Prior to construction the geometry and slope of the pedestrian trail should be verified with engineering and the parks department and must conform to ADA standards. WATER& SEWER: The site will be served by a 12" water line and a 6" sewer line along East Southlake Boulevard. DRAINAGE: Drainage on this site will be split between FM 1709 and north through the Costco site. Half of the site will sheet flow to FM 1709 and the Case No. Attachment A ZA02-034 Page 2 Y ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Table#3 Water $7,962.40 (assumes a 2" meter and 1"irrigation) Wastewater $3,780.48 (assumes a 2" meter) Roadway $1,531.66 *Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building permit issuance.The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: May 9, 2002; Approved (4-2) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3, 2002. COUNCIL ACTION: May 21, 2002; Approved first reading (6-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3, 2002. • STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 3, 2002. The adjacent property owner to the west (Bank of the West) has submitted a formal letter of opposition. Based on the City's calculations using our GIS software, this opposition is 20.04% of the surrounding 200' area. This will require a Super Majority Vote (6 of 7 council members) in order to approve this item. Due to the calculation being so close to the 20% threshold, the applicant is having their surveyor prepare calculations using actual surveyed boundary measurements. This may affect the vote requirement dependent upon the outcome. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2002cases\02-034ZSP.doc , • Case No. Attachment A ZA02-034 Page 3 ..... r \ Vicinity Map ... . Sonic - W.E. Mayr.. ield Subdivision ffIliEllik losi,„:11,11, h, ..,... s • A Wil inal Egli lam. immi _, a =Nom NORTHWEST PIC E.o.m.gi..1.1.11"m•11111.11111 t, - e•S:k ,o,PSkik 19111111 '1 Nitiftek . , II;OP LO kit Al afl 141141% . II PD k w '' '111 II Gal H,ME GUM I r , ---1, or MI MEIMMI _. ,0.0-k•k-vtikki•x• App, -in ,us.1,NR2L p 4-,,,4 . iwt,, 0,004, d°1-' 111V6)'14,-/_ k .ii, it '..150k_vi "--____Q __ 7—, VM \Ao 7 A 0.0 a s 4 0-Ac- , 5 — 0;,..-____ ele r i a UNIILI 1 , 1 / — /..\ 1000 0 1000 2000 ' 3000 Feet . \Jr S ( -) ,..._..i. Case No. ZA02-034 Attachment B Page 1 • • • • • • . 0 0.0 • • • . 1.0 C..) --,- - -- - - '''''''---"-.zaire vidid-6.148 • . . • co- o,sz 1434.0riii IISV;?, A113 .”','.. .......,g..,er./.1 A 0.4.3.,I,I,FI • __....... .,..... -.- -4.- ,..",..,:..;.......- Ai;17-........ ...., , .,. .......................TT m.,, ... ,,,,/ . •-••• "-L.—,• '••••'.:•", `•,'",..'7'-'*?..^7.7 i 1141Y:T}4 -,-.-44...4-4,,,I,..,111....1 0.110/.61 •••=4:71‘,VA;4%; •••,..,0. ".' ...:F.4•70WrIatcririer3:4' . 01411 lioxi.p.,%KW.31,4 0.0,1 I.,./ '.•-....", • .....01.1..,.....c.nr, elVs:ri gttl'at,.11.4." .1/2:$47.;E:Iiiti-li.74:74."... .......,....‘..,..‘,.....,, g `,-::"7!; ...,..3.1 9',tn....4....6i, ............,1M11..00.,•C.01 .I'..;...-1:1..'±12-Lf:l . '... .i.''; 'ri. ,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,.......A 0,112..ittf.,`,"•• .1.r.i•IG.,..,/•,,I,,,..,.AN 1...I.:I 0,,i> . "'..'.1 = --:-. .-4:-.- _ -.7.4.....-•--:-.-1---: ;--'. --,'-'.-.---..-4-',..7-.r_._11-z.-• ,-.--...7,7.....---,17. .:-: 3 .v 1., -,,t-ItFirT-RigliFTWIt • - ,.., ..,,__. r-'•• • ..,,,.......,,,,, . ...... ...-1,-.. - a.......,.... ....„..........,............ 71...09,f4.,/SY 1,0,,,,,,,,,,?,•,,,,••:.,....•,3•f ---.7F• ...7*.• I7,-... . .a....,,,,,....., 0 k.;i...S....I.,.........0 I..pi I x........1.4 1, I --si7.7- ....,,......, ...;:rir.7,..,-:. ....•*,-.•....I ............ ..”- _LI' ,,,,,,,,.....,%,,;•;,,,,t;,,,i,,,s.nliCI 4,4i,;;14,1,144,.114.,74,..A.,,L1.41. --7-• .7,3•••••••., ..--77 - ...,..c................,.. ,.....4 It .,„,..,... Tem.,.Tr,":943,04.ei,i.1..40 ..... IV.?....f.ii,•alsa--''.--'''-''.1 1.114.1 113,1 14P;:17.74.11iVitt' • , 1 1•41.1 F''.1:".7,a'" e.,v t•',,,,,,.i4' sr.* • ..44-7;74 7;.;•;',...r.,'4,14 Oz.1,..0r0V4 a 3,a0.1,..1W3 1 1 1 . tiOirleVal00,1 113,0'41 .1i 4 .1.4,P1I..:..7I71.:.,44'1.•i•.,.V1,.0,,.ra.l1a16,,tI.'.%,wS;1C.4.1"4/I.7 7,1i3T,1.".,.,/...,,1,1..;...0T.0‘,lVe..!.iA 4..a.rl0 1.Ii,10.,1..'4•,.,.':.i..`1...,”•."',3 1.;0,1.0,:1',,F,9;-4-7Ea 4,r-171m.',,..kZ,...7:0,..1,,.111..0',.0a,?.Nr.1.1 f,J;3..,..0?1.!.,2..1I/t37.4r^1r .g. .7 177:!Virt ' r : . . 1" . 0 = 4:zx / I ,1• • ..,,. g•VIF,,T.,1=1!1-1fo .,,,, '-'41`112e4,. - : .4 . .. 117,1'..ronc141.47747114.4V43.4^:ilgl.r.4 t . . i •........ a... WI.7-.4.`11.11457. f,.,...,''',, 1..;P: ,. 1-• -------,,-1,---.6 ,,_. 1._,.,...:,.....:,-...V.00.614' 7/ . '',. 1 1 '$'::44,- •.._...•"?' , '.. . , % ‘'..;;;;;.:`,;I:--'- .-•.• / :! ' 0.,.:\•L .•:...\-Azi.N.,-,1\:::\ \i‘. ..\, . tir ,..,:ii* ..?1; ',..P.e. i • . .41,41: .t :'2....";"...-:•Ltl. 1,tnilt ci..wt *Vs-T..gas'7V1S.1I.1. / P '',.--n \ \r,. L teae- , ,.•.,,,. C 15,1A 11,11.0 ITC111., , .t i.‘.45'. .1 ..`,14.,_Tat C.,10.01'.4 1?7;n • - '7"',.....'..71',.g"..,,!.B ,:"'1.43-2,"" A . . ;-- ,* ‘. .. '....r4N. . .:,1:01, - - ,."-- • ".F-4:-.,--- . .V.,-." . - i. - 7i•t?.. I I -'it-7i • , - ,.'.: -;.-;444.4 WI ,..4 / lt. ....144x#:.., .--'-. Q ri 5--1 Y•45 g ,, Ail • i JR --,t4ife/ ?, - . ..,,PRP41,•i' . /.0 - Iiii ii'''.41••••• ''''k: ..,./.,.../.'''' / 7 71/3,'el:/..• *'.7. 'I ..MAY ' 1 / I '':Wstntii" . I )7 • .1 '7•011=j,..a...1,lios 3,,, • ,-k....,,,,0.<,, ,.,,:,.,1'....!,.o..,.-._. ,i.,..r..ir,•!,..,?•,..a co t• I , . ar.P. ' 'y4 ii,'.... '1 '--4 .71:',:t01.1,","re t-'-' "TPIan•II3,..,-Iii41'1,„...17:-.70,LD;oruo*Q.P/6.- II,--;:ii*:17r.,/%447..„,,,,,,;kx.,..r.%.11_44--.":.1..,. i/ 0' t e• .e. R1 C. ../ \ • ,..r.......1114 ,...'.4,T:1-4"Cg1.4.i•e.,0 g $.••••t Itch., 10 • ',..k- ,<-1 — &.' •-71 . ' ;'''.. r , co .4-444,-'0,4..4,..r.41?.......4..-.3 g • • i k ni/ ____,.....,,.,: 7-1- ,-,....0......,,,..ga VI ,/400 Lij I.'rai /'..,""' . -'''..- 1/(Z‘A.•'-.I. .. .1• P-,:, ''',.,&,--4.- ',,,V$,,i• ./'71;11,--•,• -IL: iv-- , 'Y/2 c. /1 e' ''''- ..dx)-0,1i i 1 e ,....,- r- TiVit---, -I.5( , EA '1 , •. •:.: i '' '.6 1.!•••,, l •(;•,40:1:."1 ; -K' • > 1*.L.1..,a,•,,,,,,,,,,.•,,,-,..”...e.,,r.,'7±Ert-) aa,a,.?r••...,'RI ,4' 1.f,,„,1...-1/4),,,,,,/,- (i.;4 . 4'1. -11 Z ....,,,.c4.-........ 1 , /• ' -...,.. ,f'',4`".41.3;• `.-,I,..., ,-b '9'.,9,,,..,.•,'•'"'t.'"...g;!.71'...(1,1 4.a.r...1.:,\-.......... ' -..1. '`1` ' '\ •R 4 i fit 1. 4,..4.,i,.....i.7%Wu 1,,,r•!.,,....,;,,,,.id ..,,,..,..,„.... 4, 1,.....,,tc,1.1\114:IL,,,,,,e..,,,,,.:...\:. . , \ ,. , ...i;... ,, :::,*.g.• ',..e4 4., .3.,..i. •-• ,........,-......,..,-. ii ,..-.. - .; -.. <.;•;;;;,,,•-- -....,,,,: 41 , --...'-tr2.,:v.... .--w--q,-y,a,71,73 : ,n,,,,,,. ....,”a 4-,,.._ - - .,,',, . • ,AV.).*4-,... . ",--..1,,,.,, i • 4191 .S.1,1t4131A i , ,..... ------,;-:zz-z•?..sz:-t7"......2-.''.--4.,‘ 0 x--..Ar'""'.1' • I ...,,,, . d.".'... `'' ,....- .t..,•-••."' I , I •''"'" • . •-••1 • 5.,..., I ' . 0 1,,,,,,, ,,..,ar •ea: '''' E •-" s • i ,",... •1 11. •• ....'s""•••-., 1 I •............ a I . .— • i • . " ,,,A,0 ; 'v:' 2..":"1-S.f.:'.41/: :4.........""711' i' -.--- • f f. - I IT . r /)--, ,,s -;-...,..,,...-( 1 1 . .,i , ,.... / ,.Y.1•7,40 1 73..ra,,fl .„ . .. ' • 1 Isi4-ra.A';;,' 1 .' - 11,1 - • y'it'l 1 _ . I --' i ' ,...„,, ' . .;•ie. 2.-,)--- 411"'71 7 1 I , -,•,, ..,4,..:,,.. 1-7+ q , •ztfps 6 en 3!..3.71:1 ‘..„ ,Aps.,,,,,..r ,I.,..,7-•i liW;eg,Ins,„.-;;;L" I . ../',..„., = 4 I • /1.'%67 / csA cu . I • I • I 1 . • . -'..V....' • czt -et • i r • i _ •U4 A • . . . " _......__._____ • ,..-•., --, ( ) • , , . _- _,-) . I. • • . . . ., . 7,----.,. • . .--—, ( , , • , ; ,... .... . '-- . r....) 0 ,.... _ _ . . . ......,.....,.,........ 1 ['.Piet „.,,.., 4. • •;i 41' ..,,„t-%,, ;t11 I F 1 4r,til [4;a11; ...,,,ttttti -•.:14' !..., 4.'''.'!7,''''',-,--L,,.14 r0t • \ • T:::--:...;,;--;;tLI .Liall'ja,i,6:1,':;(ii:,itit:....!;i..,:,:. .t\ tt:I I ... -,__, "_ rf1 . . . r-1:701-._,_._,,—,‘,.--.. .\.7.--,---,,?.jte•,:,-...=V4. ' '"i''illItilit 1 L..1'1 ' ..., ; tit i tl ifg 1 fi 11 it 0 0 -- ,,„,I.t 4, ..ii,...,_01.0... 3t II ., t t I At, 0....i.t5.I....i., Itipz,',-;_.' 14:1 riLli 111- ''' -' . 111'11 ' I 1:tvir 1 1 11 111111 E-I" 11 1 ...!„.,,_.,....._„,_„„:..„.„ •1 11.1511r1r7Atk ,II,11 ,K ilia,!.°' ; 1101 Ill thtlittli . .gag/It:0010; `,1 1 ;.---.1-...--7-2,iii--;;Tiiltlb'j"tlILI:4:11q1'—:...:r. ".---t.;I:lit!..1:::::::„:11.11;1111 L41T112;it.....•,..........•-', • ., Ut t.t0 1,- ,..„,„:.all''1.,•4''.-'•'C• .,W ''''• '' -11-- t.t101 t i .5 N. ...„ . . .._„..... ___:: , ral_,_..:..... .. 1......r1r....,___._,.. 0 t.:: 1 ., . . ,.. .. • . Ll •-.7.- ii?rilv 1.:_,L,[4: .,---,..:-, 1-- ,31-...11.:. :'..11'If I " 'I-1' 4—1.f i 4 i...," F --1,...mo, 1 • ,....,,- sr t..... --f-li'I,--q ti.. ,..-.r 1.1...„..1,„,,p_.14.,1„..„,„....... 1...F,„,,..,,„„.,,ik..-„,...7,4 .„2....„..:11', .1.-;:...:1-1,:td...,e,,,..1,..uil ..] 1 f.-74 I I i'=.''---2-'MI:.Alltr;.1:,: .ii.-.4itkrala I. -ilj :i.';'::,74q.z,4P-;,;.r...,F4gra.....,.. ',.s.'--..&'.•:t.5-4i- ..— v.- ,- 1- 1-17:1=7:7— 4— . . ,,,,. , ..,,7„ • : 1,....-..11 ••• 1.,.. ,-1_,I 7 lizr 1"...-.ifel''...4.--. .-.--....1...d t4orati El.EVATIO,I1 . p SOUTH ELEVATION ' • Li, z CC 1- ,, .1 • 2., •C) titi w • - 2 ill _J 'Y t.t1 .,- IiiiiilliiMiliiiik "fe.)7571?":'1,. /.. C'4*:.;,!.'2.7 '''.'..'"'"'.... • U) -i . Mr' --•:=,.-...!,,r7-etrs...1:7;7",77.... „z1,:....:.:4,..,..,,-.,:-..,..,,:?,,F.,,ii..... -,.. .....-. .-1-•._ T ,;,•„:. /„,,,,,:,,,,,.1.,,,I.--,.:1,•,i).1-4,..F .T----2-. ,v.-i.k.,, ;• .:...4....,--_,T ...q--.^i• ve,'-' 1 I ,,,,A.A.A, '‘,.„:F.,,,,-,,,,.. ...„-4_,,0• i, IrA,4,,•A rp 'ATI:AT i:,,r,,,,,,,,..,- ,-,r,,-.: ,, 1,, : ,„....,,,,11-4.1 iii il 1 F AI fr r 1 111 I I- ri 6 .it?". 1..14 .. I!,.•.t... 1.. ,4 Jt ttl, it i'30, t•I IV PfT . 111,11,,,, h I,,r,r,'4 .1 , I-,',,1,, •, ' ti .: '' •• .0 .' 01!__Y.alit AILEALAtrAIA ,,--- 10111.,J1111I13,17':.t!.1:111111,4,14'.:*11114„T•110111, ,, ..,.____:,,,rIn1t11.1,1:.,.2.Llrih,rrL',IF1A_:f I'..1 1,._71_11t;IL11114.„1_,j,Lif, _1/411.14A1'_..,..:.411,:,111,„1541,11,.11-11,11.11.1____1_1'_...ir':,.....!.•_1'7:7'.......1'..._' 1 __•1!r___'-_,:_._ . 1 I. .. .. ' • :, '......- I .1-51'1F.--vtt • : . I TH ti•i ,/,4...... ... !... - .'1..t1W1t. _,•.!.„, bi....11 - p..: '1•,. ..4. • . .. .. ..: ..1,II -.c ..,.. .. 2,1 ,- i,.1,,,,i .,,, . . , g 7, :if tv AIL.1 , .I Jj . . . .Lilt?,4, - 41 IL . . -1..-, . I J., , r.-- ,.... .. ,a,-, , A, - •--..,,L14,-,- ,i r..,_ • ..1—,,... ..., I t.Li.X.14,, ,4,:i 5‘,..-1-.- - -,t , '-' ••- • ,,.....-- .--11,--,— :,--•---.:1 -'---- ' . •-,'-',.-F-7-,21.1;t1","1-'Z'''TJ)::T7-I -.1' i if ,4 3 n a 2. .. . . . ' Id 1-'!. 3--'.4.11-4 --e--._„.‘„""1_15'.„-j,..,„,-;''..1'-'g44.4.,:...,,;-,..44.-r,,Iii't,,,i.:,Fr.''';.,,,,1411:1---'2'LR:-'----'.: -7'..'...-7*..-",';.---1.7'-'..*-..9'.'"---. ;:--."'"?‘145''''-'-'7 ._.'''.... '''''aI;'-It' I I i n,„ _r..,-,_ A ' i'-',17.' '' ' -— - - .•---.. --- --— --- ..-- - --- - -------„.±.=-_,..:.:=7„, - 3' .... 0 tr. , • - I I '14-1 . „,..li.i.'. .1—,. i .:1-,- 1 y•,..,e,,, II -EA ELEVATION 1 '._ „ ......w.- - - 1 . I • R,.,zoti,st...ic„,,,,,...,,,„,,..,?..,,c,„tk,..,,,,,.....,t,..„.„,s,,,,._,,,,„.,, Icvi,):..c.,.5.4.4,,,,,EC::Fc'g•':41!,:t::11:t.::S:Tic:it?:.3,C.'"!:i':1,35'":::6;E..1•1 Ei:1 o;i it''.alf:EieiltAP.i:F.,if."...,bE.ta..1EfaAt S. t4 ,. 4 . 1 -I ........,.v........-1 ii;11. -1111.11.. • ., ., : . i 1 il , ",,,,,4 i4,4-• .. ,.--.=7-,_.,,b,..... _ , -,,4,..,, til m IIP•r ili-------- 1 I 1 ,...“:.- ,— ...,,I.--,-----,.-.-.,.... . ..I. ,i.- 4=14....,,.41 ..,....„, .; -,-,-,---------...,,v -Air, -- -------- - ... . ..;:----,...------5,1..j, .-•,.,,,,,,, 1 , . 1,-ul -rtiftltirtf ..',Irs -ign-tttrirt.'14,144!tilifill'Illf,tt-25tAiriTrailti t.-i7jit,Orixbiliril iTI-q,i=21:41,i11[1'111 1.1t,IIIIIII1IIIIIIIV-1..ft-i'?7,R,v„ /.,..,.,'''',i,' riiiIi.91'1111'0.41[IPitfl.it"iill,'Ik 441444'Ill ptutitui,•.I I Ili. ..,-.11'uo il tii;40,,,EfE4-its.,,n,virlutAtlii,i,,,uitimi,;,:athiluiLliG,,„.,411,,,it„,,R,„,,,.,,,,,,_ . ..iiimp..t4,P 4 444, 11 11,-ilAi i,U gi Lfj,1 .A,Nitig4L1.1 ti•Cittal 21: I Er.t,• j,..t.,,t,,,„„,,,,,i,..2_,.:1‘.„.±,5 .,...-L ..,....,•...,...,-.._,Ii,"-___ ! 1 1 i 1 9 . - ,, 1.4';',1.7.::',-- 1 ..---—A a . • 1 g7..- 1,:f.r.; I I 1' —-- i • '.1_il lir: I i: . I 1 '' 1 I LI . nit,•f.-4kri v---c-T,firm I I I N 1 .. ---•, ....1, --,- . . „:„. .,,,.,4g,, , , .ii.. .2- -7_,,_,-1--.,-x--.7.4;,..c,....,-iTiyatli-J.,,,-.1„,-.1,-_-i, ...L1,..., - . -,_____1__1!,,... "-'•.:1 -1:7.*°•.- -,I.P:12=-•••',,,t2,--=1..„,:,..„•', ••-'"...:4 7,7,:.:7•'=•:,'i4-1.yr,,. ..'-',-Z,L'.:t7t.t77,..,, ,,,,,,,00' ••••001.......,..J. '....,,,,,,,,,,..4 11,...1.-...---_11--1.1-130.,* , 1< 1 I — r I 1 ii....%,". I _ li -,1-•.,- 3.i<14, iti,'•::.. 1.i SliEET. T gl.....E __„VATION ...i . I = 1.1• . RECD APR-2 2 2002 A2-1 AD . • • . ......,ci".T..!:..p.•,•to99.2•:... L.--------••••••••••••• .,,..t.,... • ---- -ZA-.02-•- 0 ` AD eD . (PP t•J n . • •. • SNOt1dMi . co 1, v s SAIl 3>IN"!- IOS- OPIH 3}!N!- nos^SSZ K ` `— t ARGISIoli. i 3.c juts n i 4: }at qp�nii, t iaii��' I r :F.1 m 14.1 T . N cD .N}.; ri cc bi� tr , kt = > :r r{r >r ,V::: . k 0 z i_ if ; ;,l r. N. 1 jam. rI I:: -- 'j— .x.: f--- _ . Ff tr , : _. U .r a 'yL��1----- n .zi ,y . 3 Li_ { Q . 1 1 7 r W l isi. rr)= i : ;Ti- I -- j 51 ` ' s :;. w ;z ■ tit t :rAi Ft . �`: naualamriaumeeirei�t 1 Case No. - Attachment C ZA02-034 Page 3 ENCORE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP 1705 WEST:N OR`ITTWE S T HIGHWAY IWAY SUITE 2:60 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 • TEL 817-329-7343 FAX$1.7-4$.1-.1544 March 8,2002 Mr. Denn.is.Killough.and Mr..Ben Byner City of-Southlake Planning and Zoning Department 1721. E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake.,Texas 76092 Re:. SP-1 Zoning Request(C-2 uses),Lot 11t2,Block 1, W.E.Mayfield Addition,City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas(2550 Southlak.e Blvd.,Southlake,Texas) Mr. Killough and Mr. Byner: This letter is a request for SP-i Zoning(C-2 uses) on the above referenced project. The permitted uses are limited to fast food restaurants appropriate in a C-2 District. Development Regulations: Lot 1R2 will be subject to the C-2 Regulations,the Corridor Overlay Regulations, the Residential Adjacency Regulations and other applicable ordinances except for the following: 1:. Floor Area Tbe-niin:imum size for a:separate building or structure in this.district shall be 1250 square feet. 2. The canopies associated with the restaurant use will have pitched roofs that w:ill,be.integrated into the overall building structure. The canopies and_other roof structures will be surfaced with barrel tile identical in'color to adjacent developments. 3. The front and rear columns of the canopies will be covered with the same masonry material as the building. All interior columns will be textured and.painted to match;the stucco portion of -the building facade. 4. Location,size and height of canopy as shown on site plan. Sincerely, Dennis H. Clark President Case No. Attachment C ZA02-034 Page 4 . Appendix Item#2---Pitched Roof Buildings smaller than 6000 square feet in floor space are required to have a pitched.roof. The intent of our design is,to meet the appearance of:a pitched roof by pitching the canopy roofs so that they connect directly to the parapet wall of the building structure. The area enclosed by the parapet wall will be sufficient to hilly conceal the roof top-equipment. We`.have also added three building projections from the front.and sides of the building which have pitched roofs and which continue the appearance of a pitched roof structure covering the entire structure. 1.: Small restaurantbuildings-with their-concentration of roof top equipment.makes it impossible to have a pitched roof over the;entire structure and still have the roof top equipment concealed from view. A fully pitched roof would not provide any screening of roof top equipment. 2. T.he-building is 22' 10"-wide. The building is.uot wide enough to create.a pitched roof along the perimeter walls and still provide a lower flat roof surface to house the rooftop mechanical units. 3. The canopies are.an integral part of the appearance and function of the building. The • intent:of the proposed design of the canopies is to enhance the building appearance . while meeting the pitched roof requirements.of the code. - Rein 4/3---Columns.Supporting Canopy The:buildi.ng will not be supported by nor express any columns:however,the canopy over the parking spaces will be.supported by tube steel columns spaced at 11'0"and located at the side of each parking space. The proposed design will wrap the columns at the front and rear of-each canopy and the front colurtms on the patio with masonry matching the stone veneer:elements`ofthe building. This is shown on • the building elevations. The remaining coluinns will be textured and.painted so as to match the stucco portion of the facade.• 1. As seep from Southla.ke Blvd.,.Hwy 114 and adjacent properties,-h.e columns will appear-to be wrapped in masonry material'matching the building facade. This will create a uniform- appearance.'in keeping with the building facade. 2. if all of the columns were wrapped in stone-the image created would.appear too massive • creating a forest of large masonry columns. The intermediate columns:being coated and colored to match the building would be much less obtrusive. • • Case No. Attachment C ZA02-034 - Page 5 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA02-034 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 05/03/02 Project Name: Site Plan— Sonic, W.E. Mayfield Addition APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Encore Retail Development Company, LC Bury+Partners—DFW, Inc. 1705 W. Northwest Highway, Suite 260 5310 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 100 Grapevine, TX 76051 Dallas, TX 75230 Phone: 817-329-7343 Phone: 972-991-0011 Fax: 817-481-1544 Attn: Dennis Clark Fax: 972-991-0278 Attn: Juan Vasquez CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/22/02 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT(817)481-2086. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency N Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways N Lighting Y Must meet requirements in Lighting Ordinance No. 693-B Proposed S-P-1 District Regulations 1. The applicant is requesting that the minimum size for a separate building or structure in the district be 1,250 square feet. (The C-2 districts have a minimum size 2,000 square foot requirement for separate buildings). 2. The drive-in canopies will have pitched roofs, in place of the building having a pitched roof. (Corridor overlay regulations requires that all buildings smaller than 6, 000 square feet shall have a pitched roof.) 3. The front and rear columns of the canopies will be covered in the same masonry material as the building. All interior columns of the canopies will be painted to match the stucco portion of the building façade. (Corridor overlay regulations require that all exposed Case No. Attachment D ZA 02-034 Page 1 structural support columns be constructed of, or clad in the same masonry material as the principal structure.) 4. The drive- in canopies locations, sizes and heights approved as shown on the Site Plan. * Prior to construction the geometry and slope of the pedestrian trail should be verified with engineering and the parks department and must conform to ADA standards. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Impact Fees, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * The applicant must adhere to all regulations of the Lighting Ordinance. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA 02-034 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Sonic- W.E. Mayfield Subdivision - --,.... ....\ -......,, .,r 3 1 5 gritilli s • III Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. Bank of the West 1. C2 1. Retail Commercial 1. 0.89 2. Lowe's 2. C3 2. Mixed Use. 2. 3.60 3. Costco 3. SP-2 3. Mixed Use 3. 16.3 4. Wydham Properties 4. SP-2 4. Mixed Use 4. 1.25 5. Wydham Properties 5. SP-2 5. Mixed Use 5. 2.21 6. Park Monticello 6. C2 6. Retail Commercial 6. 2.52 7. International MBC 7. C2 7. Retail Commercial 7. 0.89 8. Sterling Properties 8. C2 8. Retail Commercial 8. 1.73 9. Southlake Ventures 9. C2 9. Retail Commercial 9. 0.89 10. Southlake Ventures 10. AG 10. Mixed Use 10. 0.93 Case No. Attachment E ZA02-034 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Sonic — W.E. Mayfield Subdivision NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: Two (2) • Craig Coup, Southlake, TX "I'm a local resident who does all of my retail shopping and dining in Southlake. (Now that it's grown!). The area around 114/Kimball/Southlake Blvd is within 2 miles of my home and I would love to see the continued development. In particular, now that we have almost all retailers in the area is the continued success of restaurant, fast food, drive-thrus etc. There is an empty track of land just south of the Costco that has been empty while all other areas are growing. Hopefully, the city can move forward, particularly in that spot". (Received via email May 7, 2002) • Randall H. McCauley, President, Bank of the West, 2438 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, TX is opposed. See Letters 1 and 2. (Received May 9, 2002 and May 29, 2002) Case No. Attachment F ZA02-034 Pagel • • Letter 1 • N Y-0B-2002 15:54 BANK OF THE WEST BIT 44B 0634 P.02/02 • BANK°the WEST Randall H.McCauley President May 9,2002 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake Via Fax Transmission Dear Members: • I am writing to request consideration of traffic flow abatement in the access easement connecting Bank of the West with the proposed Sonic restaurant site to the east of the bank's property. I am not in opposition to the project itself. • As I understand it,the proposed access to the property is from the existing driveway on the southeastern corner of the bank's property. I also understand that alterations to the existing median and curbing would be necessary to allow acceptable access. The bank is pleased to consider these alterations upon receipt of the final proposed plans and • specifications approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I do have concerns about unabated traffic flow from the subject site westward across the • bank's property into the Lowe's parking lot. Due to the configuration of the bank's • motor bank facility,there is a significant risk of accidents occurring in the area where the motor bank traffic will merge with increased traffic flow to the west. This is a perpendicular intersection of traffic with extremely difficult visibility when cars are parked in front of the bank in designated parking spaces. • I would request the inclusion of appropriate safety measures including speed bumps and stop signs to slow the flow of traffic across the bank's property to help protect the • customers of both businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, REC'D MAY 0 9 2002 //41:‘,7/4,;(17 •andall H.McCauley President-Southlake 243R F.Snuthlake Boulevard • Southlnke,Texas 76092 • 817/442-808R • Fax 817/488-0634 TOTAL P.02 Case No. Attachment F ZA02-034 Page 2 Letter 2 BAIDK4e EST Randall H. McCauley Prrsit ni • May 29,2002 Honorable Mayor and Council Members City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 Via Hand Delivery • Honorable Mayor and Council Members: • Please consider this correspondence as official opposition to the zoning change from • agricultural district"AG"to"S-P-1"Detailed Site Plan District Regulations with"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses for the Sonic Restaurant site at 2550 East Southlake Boulevard. Bank of the West's opposition as adjacent property owner is based on the significant increase in traffic due to the proposed use•and the proposed ingress/egress to the site as it • affects our property. •We believe the unabated flow of traffic from such a high intensity • use poses a danger to our customers. We would be mord inclined to support a use with less intensive traffic patterns affecting our property. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely; Randall H.McCauley President-Southlake • RECD MAY 2 9 2002 • 2438 E.Southlake Boulevard • Southlake,Texas 76092 • 817/442-8088 • Fax 817/488-0634 • •i Case No. • Attachment F ZA02-034 Page 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS i ORDINANCE NO. 480-399 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1B1, W.E. MAYFIELD SUBDIVISION AND BEING.9451 ACRE,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG"AGRICULTURAL TO "S-P-1"DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES LIMITED TO FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 1 general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage,schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view. to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout ) this City; and, Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 2 • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 3 amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 1B1, W.E. Mayfield Subdivision, an addition to the City of Southlake, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C,Page 4,Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas and being .9451 acre., and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" from"AG"Agricultural to"S-P-1"Detailed Site Plan District with"C-2"Local Retail Commercial District uses limited to fast food restaurants as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words;phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health,safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 4 community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting 1 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,as to such accrued Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 5 violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: ACTING CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: • ACTING CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Tract 1B1, W.E. Mayfield Subdivision, an addition to the City of Southlake, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being .9451 acre. • Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 8 • • o ,o • N — . j 'I i • i i 1 f da�3' 1i �-- 1 l�f ko c9 y' ` m, r /` f k• 513 • M Cfb � Y • f .„, a t r El.rz•Y .j i y tfirS..,1.,Crr ? «. 1 a+3 - • 1`t - _n r I _ V11:INI.,, 'IAE' [..1,..�..t.T:'. -'--' • dE g• xs$F�'' lY�i'zm`kaWY ..1{ T.. T �H :ar a s �fI ' rTT \ z i, tour. t r --'^� ! [] _�_ LCYoI T rlures / a' • - t T� d rF. ,� T1 _tom 1E�!`l.4[� r ', t I -1 e / I I . l4 a i tl, `:.., t 37 . .9 j. �.. No �.�.. s,, 1 1r� $t4 J ( � J r F 1. J s� It( '�P. r El '':'it: m ��j I r- t ,�1� J fs _Lct, r.+,,, - .r 'r to -W ` .,�....,. r... r^� 1 • % • 1 .M. r �% •I Jy._.J..)i _. ii),*,14fr?`. -i--,,../q.:!') VCIA:Armi. 34:tjcitTe•---4A.,----' .:1;67,5'34,j •.' '•---6'1,- ,,,,,.,:,:.....,-...r...... P , Kam: E�RI _ O W X. \\• 1 �L�\ 4 U w o p _ / E'i...,r' .r jr II \ {1' t - 1"� y urcr w. 5. r *: 1 1�?"`Y'i r.\ t�, r " \fit 1 \ .\ . '` ; -: i �: .;� <✓e•.M,.14(0 a Qri o r k,-r: `Y t`} t Gl. • r '".: <.._... 1. 5 CEtrc aL f 0[C5. ''ly • rra'"kww.rtr r.: 3 • ama..: ri:CT " . __ LiCi.l�1.. - 3 F 1 i LIT 1 tr f 1,r :s. • { 3 '1�/ �l U. wqa I.ZtOy 7 t .d •.a. vI i { reorc.l+;vroaltATlo. 0 L Y u W � k ul — • r rmar -- -eX e.� Ufa.,..... .. e.ri,,� v'A7 • LIYC E I t 9ER ZA U2-0;4- - IV 5 at) • • ENCORE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY:`LP • 1705 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY SUITE 260 • GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 TEL 817-329-7:i13 FAX 81.7481-1.544 • March S.2002 Mr.Dennis Killough and Mr,Ben:Byner City of Southl:ake Planning and Zoning Department I721 E.'South:lake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlak:e,Texas`76092 • Re: SP-1: Zoning Request(C-2 uses),Lot 1:R2,.Block I W.E. Mayfield Addition.City•of South lak:e, Tairant County,Texas(2550 Southlake Blvd,Southlake,Texas) • Mr.Killough and Mr. Byner: • This letter is a:;request for'SP-.1 Zoning(C-2 uses)onthe above referencedproject. The permitted uses are limited to fast food restaurants appropriate ina C-2 District. rt" Development Regulations: Lot 1R2 will be subject to the C-2.Regulations,the Corridor Overlay Regulations,the Residential Adjacency Regulations and other applicable.ordinances except'for the following: 1. Floor Area—The niiiimuni size.fä.r a separate building or structure in this district shalt be. 1250 square.feet:. 2. The canopies associated with.the restaurant use will have pitched roofs that will be integrated into the overall building stricture. The canopies and other roof structures will be surfaced • with.barrel tile itentical.iin:color,to adjacent developments: • 3. The front and rear columns of•the.canopies wiltbe covered with the same masonry material as the building. Alls:interior columns will be:textured and painted to match the stucco portion:o.f the building facade. 4. Location,size and height of canopy as shown on site plan, • Sincerely, Dennis H. Clark President Case No. • Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 10 /! Appendix Item#2 Pitched ROof Buildings.smaller than.6.000 square feet in floor space.,are required.to have a-pitched roof. The intent.of our . design is;to meet the appearance of a pitched i oofhy.pitching the canopy roofs so that they connect.directly to the parapet wall of the.buil'ding.structure: The:area•enclosed.:by the parapet wall will be sufficient to .fully conceal'the.raof'top equipment. We have also added three building projections from the front.and sides of the building which have.pitched roofs and which continue.the appearance of a pitched roof structure•covering•the entire-structure. .1. Small restaurant buildings with their concentration of roof top equipment makes it impossible to.have apitched roof:over the:entire structure and still have-the roof top equipment concealed::from view. A fully pitched.roof would not provide any . screening of roof top equipment. 2. The building is 22' 10'wide. The building is not wide enough to create a pitched roof along the perimeter walls and still provide a lower flat roof surface to house the rooftop mechanical units. 3. The canopies arc an integral-part-of The appearance and nction of the building. The intent of the proposed design.of the canopies is to.enhance the building appearance while meeting the pitched roof requirements.of the•code. Item it3—Columns Supporting Canopy The building will not.be supported bynor express any columns: however,the canopy over the parking spaces will be supported by tttbe steel columns spaced:at 11'T0"and:located•at the side of-each parking space. The:proposed design.will.wrap•the columns at the•front:and-rear of each canopy and the front columns,on the patio with.masonry matching the stone veneer elements of the building: `This::is.shown on • - the building elevations. The:remaining columns will be textured arid painted so as to match the stucco portion of the facade. • -1. .As-seen froni'Southlake Blvd,Hwy.11.4-and.adjanent properties,the columns Will appear to. be wrapped in masonry.material•matching'the building.facad.e. This will create a uniform appearance in keeping with the building facade. .2. If all of the columns were Trapped'in stone the image created would:appear ton massive • creating-a forest of large masothy columns: The intermediate columns:being coated and :colored to match the building would be mutih-less'obtrusive. • • • • Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 .Page 11 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Attachment G ZA02-034 Page 12 •R MEMORANDUM May 31, 2002 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sharen Elam, Director of Finance Ext. 1713 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 810-A, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinance No. 810, amending FY 2001-02 Annual Budget. Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 810-A to amend the FY 2001- 02 Annual Budget. Background Information: Ordinance No. 810-A is presented to the Council to reflect the proposed mid-year changes to the Adopted FY 2001-02 Annual Budget. The amendments to the budget reflect a decrease in revenues and expenditures of $381,638 and $680,581, respectively. "Exhibit A'' is an attachment to the ordinance, and includes a summary of the proposed revenue and expenditure revisions titled "Proposed Mid-Year Budget Revisions FY 2001-02". The revenue amendments are as follows: Due to the economy, sales tax collections continue to come in below the original budgeted revenue projections and it is anticipated that this trend will continue for the remainder of the fiscal year. The finance department is proposing a reduction in budgeted sales tax revenue of$289,712, which will represent an estimated collection of 5.76% ($4,885,288) above last fiscal year. If you recall, City Council approved a Tennis Center Management Agreement on March 19, 2002. Based on the agreement, it is necessary to reduce the projected Tennis Center Revenue by $91,926; this is the amount of revenue projected for the City to earn for the remainder of the year if the City managed the facility. Please note below a reduction in Parks and Recreation expenditures related to the tennis center facility. The budget amendments to the departments are as follows: Division 100, City Secretary: Reflects a proposed decrease of $27,000, primarily due to reduction in meeting supplies, printing and reimbursement for college tuition. Division 102, Human Resources: Reflects a proposed decrease of $2,000, primarily due to reduction in anticipated college tuition reimbursement. Division 103, City Manager's Office: Reflects a proposed decrease of $2,500. The reduction is in tuition, temporary labor and travel. Division 105, Support Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of $118,063, primarily due to delaying the replacement of computers and janitorial service. The janitorial service reduction is due to hiring a full-time custodian. Division 106, Finance: Reflects a proposed decrease of $2,000. The reduction is in office supplies and tuition. Division 131, Fire Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of $224,371, is primarily due to the delayed hiring of three firefighters and Fire Chief Position as discussed in the City Manager's memo after the September 11 events. Division 132, Police Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of $127,790, primarily due to the delayed hiring of three approved police officer positions as discussed in the City Manager's memo after the September 11 events. Division 133, Public Safety Support Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of$10,000, due to vacancies in dispatch positions during the fiscal year. Division 142, Building Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of $9,000. . The reduction is in professional services. Due to the decline in growth, building services is not anticipating expending all professional services funds this fiscal year. Division 144, Streets and Drainage: Reflects a proposed decrease of $10,000. The majority of the reduction is in uniform, tuition and environmental (clearing drainage ways). Division 146, Public Works Administration: Reflects a proposed decrease of$10,000 primarily due to delayed hiring of an intern. Division 151, Economic Development: Reflects a proposed decrease of $5,000. The majority of the reduction is in travel, advertising and office supplies. Division 161, Community Services: Reflects a proposed decrease of$2,000 in college tuition reimbursement. Division 162, Parks and Recreation: Reflects a proposed decrease of $134,867, primarily due to the tennis center personnel being removed from the budget once the new management contract was approved by City Council. Division 164, Library Services: Reflects a net increase of $4,010 as approved early this fiscal year. Council decided not to continue the Grapevine Library Services ($60,000) for the year and use the funds to purchase a security system for the library ($64,010). See the attached spreadsheets for additional detail regarding these proposed budget amendments. Financial Considerations: The proposed amendment decreases budgeted revenues and expenditures. It is expected that revenues will continue to come in at or slightly above budget estimates with the exception of the revenue accounts amended. It is anticipated that this plan will allow fund integrity to be maintained, as the expenditure adjustments reflect ,the general fund balance . at 23.4% ($4,326,262). This is within the adopted Fund Balance Policy, which states a minimum balance of 15% and an optimum balance of 25%. This effort also provides a higher fund balance with which to begin FY 02-03. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Public Hearing, 2nd reading scheduled for June 4, 2002. Legal Review: N/A Alternatives: The alternative is.not to amend the budget and forgo the proposed revisions or modify/reduce proposed budget revisions. Supporting . . Documents: Ordinance No. 810-A and Exhibit A Proposed Mid-Year Budget Revision Detail Spreadsheet Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 810-A by the City Council. . ORDINANCE NO. 810-A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF S OUTHLAKE,TEXAS,REVISING THE BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2001, AND TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2002, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT,PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ^' WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 2001-02 budget which was approved by.City Council with Ordinance No. 810 on September 18, 2001, and submitted same to the City Council; and, - WHEREAS, a copy of said amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the Budget Amendment and has determined that the Budget Amendment attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are ( incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the revised figures,prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 2001-02 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and any. necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3. That the Budget Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2001, and ending September 30, 2002; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in'the Budget. Section 4. That the City Manager has determined that there are revenues available for appropriation in excess of those estimated in the 2001-02 approved budget. Section 5. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Section 6. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance,or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section7_. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this _ day of 2002. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Bush Acting City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this day of 2002. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Bush Acting City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: t • • GENERAL FUND EXHIBIT A Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended April 30,2002 . with comparative actual amounts for the period ended April 30,2001 (fiscal month 7-58.33%) AMENDED Percent Actual Percent Year to Date 2001/02 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 4/30/02 Budget Ex.ended 4/30/01 9/30/01 Expended ' Ad Valorem Taxes $8,501,233 $8,750,812 97.1% $7,070,793 $7,390,725 95.7% Sales Tax • 2,897,939 4,925,288 58.8% 2,653,026 4,575,780 58.0% • Franchise Fees 1,162,998 1,484,063 78.4% 960,551 1,438,969 66.8% 'Fines 472,084 906,500 52.1% 558,286 794,679 70.3% . Charges for Services 369,141 593,886 62.2% 224,177 614,813 36.5% Permits/Fees 741,971 1,184,200 62.7% 1,148,803 • 1,489,273 77.1% Miscellaneous 219,419 236,882 92.6% 280,380 379,065 74.0% Interest Income 85,897 200,000 42.9% 167,882 344,136 48.8% Total Revenues $14,450,682 $18,281,631 79.0% $13,063,898 $17,027,440 76.7% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $174,817 - $325,000 53.8% $133,385 $272,676 48.9% • Human Resources 155,467 . 274,848 56.6% 106,790 221,521 48.2% • City Manager 234,275 408,677 57.3% 195,249 379,851 51.4% Support Services 1,144,604 2,191,037 52.2% 1,255,743 2,454,490 51.2% General Government Total 1,709,163 . 3,199,562 53.4% 1,691,167 3.328,538 50.8% Finance • 263,418 515,246 51.1% 287,869 460,404 62.5% Municipal Court 179,060 357,597 50.1% 175,988 341,598 51.5% Municipal Court-Teen Court • 37,209 88,211 42.2% 45,712 84,148 54.3% Finance Total • 479,687 961,054 49.9% 509,569 886,150 57.5% Fire 1,346,136 2,554,984 52.7% • 926,066 1,9115,265 48.4% Police 2,084,453 4,394,766 47.4% 2,004,623 3,964,153 50.6% • Public Safety Support 623,510 1,112,823 56.0% 502,265 973,465 51.6% Building 559,692 1.024.830 54.6% 508.662 970.258 52.4% Public Safety Total 4,613,791 9,087,403 50.8% 3,941,616 7,823,141 50.4% Streets/Drainage 510,403 1,058,823 48.2% 470,640 938,038 50.2% Public Works Administration 377,498 794,576 47.5% 317,266 629,167 50.4% Public Works Total 887,901 1,853,399 47.9% 787,906 1,567,205 50.3% Planning 286.776 531,203 54.0% 247,201 474,588 52.170 _ Planning Total 286,776 531,203 54.0% 247,201 474,588 52.170 Economic Development 149,282 •288,875 51.7% 121.202 226,421 53.5% Economic Development Total 149,282 288,875 51.7% 121,202 226,421 53.5% Community Services 271,939 512,375 53.1% 256,829 443,701 57.9% Parks and Recreation • 831,056 1,656,696 50.2% 629,767 1,410,062 44.7% Library Services 236,147 416.942 56.6% 81,342 224,588 0.0% Community Services Total 1,339,142 2,586,013 51.8% 967,938 2.078,351 46.6% Total Expenditures $9,465,742 $18,507 509 51.1% $8,266,599 $16,384,394 50.5% Excess(deficiency)of • Revenue over Expenditures $4,984,940 ($225,878) $4,797,299 $643,046 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) ' Proceeds from lease/CO(net) $0 $0 $0 Transfer In-Other Funds 0 0 210,000 210,000 Transfer To-Other Funds 0 (1,120,163) 0 Total Other Sources/(Uses) $0 ($1,120,163) $210,000 $210,000 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues/other sources over Exp. $4,984,940 ($1,346,041) $5,007,299 $853,046 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $5,672,303 $4,819,257 • Change in reserved fund balance $0 $0 ENDING FUND BALANCE $4,326,262 $5,672,303 fund balance percentage 23.4% 34.6% City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM May 31, 2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 805-A, Amending Ordinance 805, the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Southlake and Carol Montgomery Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 805—A, amending the Professional Services Agreement with Carol Montgomery, Municipal Judge, to enable her to participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). Background Information: The City of Southlake entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Carol Montgomery on July 17, 2001. This original agreement was approved via a City Council Ordinance (805) on August 21, 2001 and did not include a provision for the Municipal Judge to participate in TMRS. The attached amendment (Exhibit A) includes a provision that will now permit the Municipal Judge to participate in TMRS. According to TMRS, employees and those persons designated by the City who work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year are eligible to participate in TMRS. Currently, all regular full time City employees participate in TMRS at a rate of 7 percent of their gross monthly salary. Employees vest with five'(5) years of service credit, are eligible to retire at age 60 with five (5) years of service credit, or can retire at any age after 25 years of service credit. Financial Considerations: The cost associated with this action will require the City to match Carol Montgomery's monthly deposits on a."two-to-one" basis, or at the same rate as all other employees. The City will pay this amount for a period of one year (July 31, 2002—July 31, 2003), or until the end Of the Carol Montgomery's current contract. ➢ Approximate Cost: $4300.00 Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not applicable. Legal Review: The amendment has been reviewed and approved by the attorneys. 8 - E °• Ordinance No. 805-A, Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between the City of Southlake and Carol Montgomery May 31,.2002 ,Page 2 Alternatives: No Alternatives. Supporting Documents: Attached amendment for signature: Staff Recommendation: Approval of amendment as submitted. 9-A ,t CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 805-A AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ' OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That Carol W. Montgomery,municipal judge of the City of Southlake, Texas, may participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement attached as Exhibit PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 21sT DAY OF MAY 2002 IN FIRST READING. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Kim Bush Acting City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 4th DAY OF JUNE 2002 IN SECOND READING. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Kim Bush Acting City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney EFFECTIVE DATE: • AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CAROL MONTGOMERY THIS AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CAROL MONTGOMERY is made and entered as of this day of , 2002, by and between City of Southlake ("City"), a Texas home rule municipality, and Carol W. Montgomery ("Municipal Judge"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on August 21, 2001, the City approved an agreement with Municipal Judge dated July 17, 2001; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the agreement to provide that City shall pay the TMRS benefits to the Municipal Judge at a rate of NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: • 1. AMENDMENT. For good and sufficient consideration passing from each,of the parties hereto to the others, the receipt thereof being hereby acknowledged by each party, and inconsideration of the mutual promises contained in the • Agreement and in this Assignment to be performed by the parties hereto, and each party intending to be legally bound hereby, it is agreed that the Agreement is amended as follows: B. By the addendum of a new Section 12, which shall read as folllows: City shall pay retirement benefits for Municipal Judge as follows: "The Municipal Judge will deposit seven percent (7%) of her monthly salary into Texas Municipal Retirement System and the City shall match those deposits on a "two-to-one" basis." 2. OTHER PROVISIONS. It is understood and agreed between all parties that all other terms, conditions, provisions, and covenants contained in the Agreement, not inconsistent herewith, remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and reaffirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all such counterparts taken together will be deemed to constitute one and the. same instrument. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date herein first described above. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: MAYOR CAROL MONTGOMERY • • • p City of Southlake outhlo eAls, Department of Planning STAFF REPORT May 31, 2002 CASE NO: ZA01-124 PROJECT: Remington Retirement Community REQUEST: Veranda Senior Communities is requesting approval for a rezoning and concept plan for the Remington Retirement Community. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading for rezoning and concept plan request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-275a ' \_Jj (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner(481-2086) { . C) Case No. ZA01-124 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Remington/Veranda Southlake, L.P. APPLICANT: Veranda Senior Communities PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to revise the zoning district regulations and concept plan for the Remington Retirement Community. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the south side of West Southlake Boulevard(FM 1709), south of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and West Jellico Circle. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 4F,4F1, 5A1B,6A1,and a portion of Tract 6B situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and being approximately 22.558 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to include personal care facility, nursing care facility, and(senior)multi-family residential uses. REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to include personal'care facility, nursing care facility, and(senior)multi-family residential and,(senior)two- family residential uses. HISTORY: -City Council approved a zoning and concept plan on July 7, 1998. -A site plan was approved for the project on November 17, 1998. -A final plat was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 17, 1999. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Blvd to have 130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this road. Proposed Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have three(3) access drives directly onto Owenwood Drive,a proposed commercial street along the west portion of the Remington site with 60' of right-of-way,which will intersect Southlake Blvd across from West Jellico Circle. The street will eventually extend south to connect to Union Church Road. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-124 Page 1 Existing Area Road Network and Conditions West Southlake Boulevard is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widened to a seven lane roadway. May,2001 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between FM 1938;(Davis Blvd) & Pearson Lane): Table#1 24hr West Bound (WB) (16,105) East Bound (EB) (16,634) WB Peak A.M. (874) 10— 11 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,704) 4—5 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (1,743) 6—7 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,106) 4—5 p.m. Traffic Impact Use #Units Vtpd* AM- AM- PM- PM- IN OUT IN OUT Villa apartments 32 111 1 1 1 2 Independent apai tiuents 41 143 1 1 , 3 2 Assisted living units 122 262 4 3 12 9 Nursing units 170 366 6 4 16 13 Totals 365 882 .12 9 ' 32 26 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard. Southlake Boulevard, between FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) and Pearson Lane, carries approximately 32,739 vehicles with the peak traffic times occurring between 6 a.m. and 7 a.m. in the morning and between 4 p.m.and 5 p.m. in the afternoon. According to Trip Generation, 6th Edition, the site will generate approximately 21 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and approximately 58 vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour. WATER& SEWER: The site will connect water services to an existing 12" water line along the south side of Southlake Boulevard. A 10" sewer line extension of approximately 3300 feet is proposed from the southern property line to the south side of Union Church and over to an existing 18" sewer line approximately 600 feet from Davis Blvd. ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES: Water $77,319.42 (assumes 13 —2" compound meters) Irrigation $23,790.59 (assumes 4—2" simple meters) Wastewater $48,182.78 (assumes 13 —2" compound meters) Roadway $58,520.45 (assumes 292 nursing/assisted living units,41 independent units,and 32 villa apartments) ( *Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building _ Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-124 Page 2 MASTER PATHWAYS: According to the Master Pathways Plan,an 8' multi-use trail is planned along Owenwood Drive, located on the west side of the Remington property, connecting Southlake Blvd to Union Church. An 8' trail is designated along the north side of Southlake Boulevard. P&Z ACTION: February 21, 2002; Approved to Table (5-0) until March 7, 2002. March 7, 2002; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 15, 2002. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: March 19, 2002; Approved to Table (5-)) until April 1, 2002. April 1, 2002; Approved to Table on Consent (5-0) until May 21, 2002. *This item was forced to table due to the requirement for a super majority vote and the absence of a Council member. May 21, 2002; Approved to Table on Consent (7-0) until June 4, 2002. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 15, 2002. 1. The following changes have been made from the previously approved zoning and concept plan: a) Number of stories: The Congregate Living Center was previously approved as a two-story building. The new proposal shows a three- story building. b) The Congregate Care Center was previously approved as a single- story building. The new proposal shows a two-story building. c) Number of units: The previously approved plan allowed for a maximum of 202 units. The proposed plan is requesting a -maximum of 365 units. This is a change in density from 9 dwelling units per acre to 16 dwelling units per acre. 2. Under the "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning, the applicant proposes the following: a) Density:The applicant proposes a maximum density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre. Ordinance 480, Section 17.5.i allows a maximum number of 12 dwelling units per acre. b) Parking: The applicant is requesting 265 total spaces (68 one-car garages and 197 surface spaces)with 25 tandem driveways. The total Case No. Attachment A ZA01-124 Page 3 c) Building setback: The applicant proposes that buildings having a height greater than 20' having more than one story shall be setback a minimum distance from single family residential property lines as shown on the concept plan. All other buildings shall be setback no closer than the building setback lines shown on this concept plan. Residential adjacency standards (Section 43.11, exhibit 43-E) states that no non-residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any property line of a property with a low density residential land use designation. However, a structure may be built up to within 40 feet of the residential property line,provided that the structure is no greater than one story or 20' in height. d) Bufferyards: The applicant proposes that bufferyards between Lots 1 & 2 shall not be required. Bufferyards are required within and along the outer perimeter lot or boundary line (Section 42.3). e) Minimum floor areas: The applicant has set minimum standards for the unit types being: villas = 1,128 S.F.; independent living = 550 S.F.; personal care = 450 S.F.; and nursing = 300 S.F. The "MF-2" district requires a•minimum of 850 S.F. per unit. Personal care facility requirements include 350 S.F. per efficiency unit, 450 S.F. per one-bedroom unit, and 550 S.F. per two-bedroom unit. f) The applicant is proposing an age requirement restricting the age of residents to 62 years of age or older. The adjacent property owner to the west that was opposed has retracted their opposition. Therefore, a Super Majority Vote is no longer required to approve this item. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001cases\01-124ZCP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA01-124 Page 4 • 1, ) • . Vicinity Map Remington Retirement Community ... . 11111111=11 linispi -(‘ -: ov ilk vor,- • ..... —mimi\s• ii ..... .a, Mil= 1.114 • illir '' 1PP Riiii.-- . ...' 01001•001 •Er-k.,. a 03-It'. pa- ,,i 1111PETIE— .4 wasios_____ii. kiollip ,.... - • ,„— g witiodis i&i&.. ' 211111111 w 1 61440411 i iF .0 es.57c#!-- iks1 ' vgkl< ma .14.0 111 .. !tilt , aims Ilii, . 1 — E oto .._,Y-- ionoo4 11 1111 1 v1/4\..F4'• 1 gi 1. al , 1 ....„-v , in , _ I--1 m mium_ III • mar az= _ wit 1.1.1 _ mi.m. ......... 7] 1000 • 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet 1\T ii W I rk E . S . Case No. . Attachment B ZA 01-124 Page 1 . . • (4 • : , • , . ., • . . • ....--------- . _ . . ...olito.. . . • ..... ...„,...... Zr4 rn . ........ ... *...,...-7.. • .1.41.14.1.1`. .. , ..........I Alwagmex.m.... •i - ) - . . • 1 i :47,-'"-''WritARAI v•-.7-4-.-470- - -_._.............„ __,. ,. .. . •• . ..„.- . N .,......,r,...„.,.,,,,J„,,,, 4--- -7,- - - - ,-..,...r .t.•,L,......7-&•,tt.t.,4_:..- ,..;11..,..,,,,.iiriat-tr&-':.--;,:::.,..,, ..,:.,,• . i-• CD ' '""7.' ''' N.-.•11k-' --,,I,'4,•I i•,••Iit , 77.Mt t•,-,11.-...if,:i...Olt;....,,.1,- - of!1,--w. 4 ...,-1, IN • \L -- 4 A KA ... ' •-` ' t,,,tr'l.,..i.,`'':,1k,'4. ---,--',:v."1" ...-`' - •-t-e,--,..--.-',WeVrt"Tgg,4' .1,111;V:„-rez.,44W.V,1...t',i1,41,:t-'', •' ,.........z.,,,.,1.-.,.- ''.- ....''' ,'t.01.-04,;,'`,-1.- 1,,,.....,,,:,. rvd, ''''. 1:' 'r4 .A.'-'----I'-'-- '-'-'-'it,-T riiii&ii-,- •F------l'i,.9":4tr.%;4,3 a-,, \ - ..... = - 4:. ...--•„.'. .- i-i ; , , • '-'1 ri ,-_-•-„„ ___ , , ,,, ,, ,_•„J.,41,)11,y-,re waE'Isi.,*n; ‘- 0 tn ;i. N'. -• . . 17 :.1.-• witi= „.„ ;Pli I'lkitIgi'Wit.jr*kfiXOcit'ii,W = id •-:•-----,1'.."-1....9•!,-- - .:- A - . -p--"Fal1 p'1 f .-.: --ar --am.paity,Tai tiv4a.i f!, , -''•.,:q.,,...z :!:-. -..,„. .. . \ -\ -77:•7.: 1 . 0.. - . ,,. • r..... „,. . ,,,, ,1. ., ..... stll IX fl til.....",4 A I•2 1]....;•.1•ek0..1,14.1 )1 • 7,....r.sts,. •sfi...-eq-75.7 grta,:gw,.,:.•,-,t,„ • ,,, ...E,...N 1 „•-•,.. 41:.,,.,-,1...or-ili4 Lit.,,,,,,Mt.....,. ... ..-,,,,....,...--,,,,, T ,..„.....„....:. ,•.,...,..:_... ),..7j: ,41,,e.,. E-t 0 - ' _ „c v., ....-z.,4-.; •-.4E-rd 0,5iiir. 4;;I:ttelkiri,-`- r.7:-. --k ::,•'•-•14,,.„.,,,' '...1 •:1• :te .t,•'',,,,,`1,k,,,-;Mil I 1.4._11.,,-,4--.-_,,,,, /.,--1. --, --01 11 yi??..,ira-. ---1-„ple--,:-u r,1, -.'-"-\ m.,4 E.-4 _.„,...-... , --- -111t,rpt _,-:Lfc.i -•••,. 1 ----- !?;-•;,,,,,..1-.,-:. A--,,, ,,,if4 • t,1; ,,u,,,,4. 'it i --,.!-::-.,,,,t-Eirzt.5 ,J.,,..---:-^ ,. Ti--F-2.„4,...:k... I_„4- L'A.tr.,-..t a,„,, ....i..1.k.----- ... =. n) , '1,;.....,:tt.M., 7-,7(•t.7.,.:.:e "-.:•,.•„-,,,,,,, :.41 •D'Ii' it' I ki • iv. - ' ' 1-1.---4.._.t.--A_ --..,.-re-r 07-1--------,,-...- .;.-i., et.....tiliti up'5.•. til%"-A-Ar.1 t',-- , ,..,,. 1 \ .g ..,1 a-JR-G.-Eat-.•.....- ,:-.- O'itil,,,I.'',,.1,, .r4 • l'----'1' liez---------4 1 fpige ''!-Rit -ter.' -''''..:--\VICINIIIMAP cryuct;• ' LOT#1... 1..1' 4,,,'. `,.---..2.4,. 1,_-..1..-4,,,.1 .6.,:tk.,..•-4-,!, s2.!;.•.'„,..• co • CENTEit .. .,,1 :k ' c5:,,.,-,g.4 • , i'3'.1 s------.,-„,, \ Eik -iii-,4:•,1•,---tr-B7,0'1-•.'k,fitili:,ir.Oi-e.±i„(--. ,.,.., --,-:;;;40:. ,-1,-A . _ tzt--. •V4.0....qa .'•5": il- - .., : ..,-, . 4 _ !,,_.1.1E0,,,,r„,,,. ,,..„. , >•., \ ELIA 4 4-1 • .....: aznaniarrvalas ........, r ;.` i,j,.--e, r•-•-i) . ii. %.- , - -,. ....• . ;• "1..-... .. --, ii741.7. .., ' : 1.---i:ra ME141.42t4;t1,,I05.T_I;`"`:;';1 ...'"F','' ''!!'MR igr'' '-- ; •.ftr•--•, Jiki r-'-`,141. ,-,r-' •-• : : , .... -7.-t...•-C-.'',.... --,-1-- •- • ....' '- i-,.Zi,t.:, 3 . ' ' ' '-ihe‘i,W'a'..- -X.;•;...7%,/ ,10,,,,,...,,.„, ,,,,,, ..,, _, ,. ,.,,„,., . 0 41.4-MAIlts.4.MR," / .., • ,..,:,-itr'.`04.,, 1 *, -1;1,i-,.- \ ' 0 -1" ' -...' '''': :""'•]''''''.*',,--,,--;'•'''<- kV,.fri '1J'.E.....,..a14--,44',:t! ,.j. '',1 II" EC.fflutatre• ...=...,. itervintenytuAs. 1 11.2t, atwx.v:n.rttstail.../7 C=1. U1 ' 1 ,„pt, ' ',i. 4i.;„„ ,....,..:., ,`X. ." 3- f.,,,,'-;•r.,71f.i.P.A .12- CENLESY ''..1-= -" . E' i - ?UMW. -,.... .;.:.: -..)•',,,,....- 7..t.''' 12: -iii.4..ilti r'il• Wajp•Ljalt,. * Co= . • ::, ';„fx,f, ,,,,.„%riti.,--i tiliimf[iit isipA4,1 411111(..:I I, i-prildi J--,T,t . .• . .-r, . ,..,..1„4re,,,katm,01 . ig.g.a.r...... pik r.• Lop ti2 ..1,,,I a, ,. „ . . . -'-rD, • ..:,4,,,,,n2.,, &gram.;..•:•,•,--t...1, ,..,.,,•, .,,.-•. - t.,-, 4,5"-A•tp,t.,..t.,11-4,0 x : ,:II Naharzigirvn ,.: , . 1,--c, ,:-.-"'="--4. •••,-."-a-r----t---,4 ..i,t -• -,17 / N. . 02..,... -„...,. . .1,-...,:ifl .• • • ..17-i•traL.9:1. •.:127,.... 1.*1....-,....:,' riel ..,„,,, • '''itATO 111..41.. kg":41114 - '''' .: : Lin7-14.,4W_,.7'3:3,4-.,f.....-fx,.._.,20.1,',.4.1- Er VE DATA SUMMARY ..,, - • G.:4:Es,...,.."..,..4i,,ii 1).1, T.4-3--Z.....t - . .,..•a',:.., ,v,i,.. ,v,,,,,44,-,*...s ...:.....,..,..-,,)•.144.1- ..,-./,..„,..L....-.. .: r....r.-. .,..•...-n ,,....-Ii-.4.7 - . . • -• . ......., . 1 witP4.,.:Ti,•:;,...,..„.`gt..1:dtgi-7.4: ,i,...lAb.,„.,,,....?:: s,,, T4r,,;,",ii.,.., B.,...,.:•..i... •- • 1:.1k,..,..?1.,....,,,,!,,p-.= • .2.1..4:,...., -....,-,-avieis,k•iffrz.f6. •;i1,ii..14.6••••,...w. -jeg.,fti..,..i.....T ' Scl-Trix'il,fliiiiii flislii1.1. ---- ! l'.4. ,..:..... ,. ::: •.{; -t,, • • • . .. - ,...0.,. ,....,..„ . . .. ...... .. . .,.. •• " . 1 a,,,,,..-gr:.,‘, ;I:,44,..:.,..,p.,..,.,-.&dig.' -• 4d 1 ii 7.I i R• ,a N.,.. ar,.--,,f-'-'-: --•, :-'.sli1V221;i4' r.'wiT-.. . ,. 11E111INGTON . .. . ,1,..,..s.„ .. ., ...... f., moo. .. , ..,.. . . • e i N .,..e. „,11P-RIA,. . 1..V. • ..x . e... - • 6 .....••;SUMMAR.?CNANT,IEWEEEPARDS.''.:'.:1-.:1 .- :e,:, • , ,k .4,7,. , .....,.......... . i 1.4.!In! •. . .. . . irammarriaLL 1Zr. Fara u-,011,4,..1..!1 . k 1 ' . .trttutrttex;31''; -.. ATIltiliENT COMMUNITY iii-41i-ii I.1,i...., , .,- - , - ..-;.,... .---... ---=-: • ' 'r.-....--.17.- • ?i I° .. d I - . __..., •••L.,+.1*,..:. - N...,•••••,,,*: -. @OIVENWOOD DRIVEAriDITION - oglig 1 -,.• ITz-,7-......0,..,,,,., • 41.:41.14 5.,1‘. . LIT.:14hpaill T/1,-7..• •: . r•-•. --21------:- Iriniiik Elm. antogarinat - 01.1..44h..4S../c,...4 1.8111.1/11:01hTLIIIII •.... ir......7.irl,:I." ..1'..i..-±-.1.- rtir:-• - . ,I..-E114 h(1...."044...,a 1:0114.. . ' . 1 . ' I-i'it:-.4'''''' • • * .. ili.a11,11.hhnatc.....4,41.1 StigliMiliAlifliliVIMCIIIIRVITOR01.118 1E41i3 .° 'F.I.1.-14-1-S...•••• l 1 v., . 1111.1.Q,1:1111:1111.141110311Ted1MISIWAISERAL 1 I ........thh:• ' ' 1.r-ht.:it, 1...4....4,i '1-7-lataa''41“1. -:. ' 116/4,71* L** ClE611011T,KILMCAILL5CahT.011 I $4.1211'1,/ /2218.111f1ILTHAlineell - • •- - 11.111101I DM=IrElatIMIL01/ . * 1,..A)1Z131A'N g . :9'..- -.•... :r.-''''4"-rar.-irr' ig.-466F•fer runirma.manc-.. . . r.,'I..,•, .- . .. .!......... .______...... 93aa-li OPEEL, 1..ril in S AJ Gr.-1.m,"7,--43T-1--a----;":1----4.--"Z.7....1--- . PiRMErrko listi:S ANLI DEVELOP/4E4f 11,h1:1.*:1,411:ch.,4r.A. • •a.,tc.i.....ms.114:=1E.m7.,... macitoinusuMtnautz LE I ICI 11 ii• . REDID:M*115A 4 yrili•FlisAferittyr- 0•41-,...,,r...,"V ae,: .11205173112i MAD • KT.O.,.'-' . maim . i lir.. . • ,,i-t--,..,6A, .4Z-:,-,WEY-.7;tf-Nar-X;•;....,,,...- 414314-'43 Vr,,-; ,,,,, lii.uAlvta _ 6111.NLIZII "1E:1-1'e••;!'1 7e----ww-1-,,,----v-r-w--111"Az--- : rt..... • ,i....-....r6. . .. • • .rent.'''''.4144.4f1.71,XEis-air .11.1.111S,ft . . 7/2538:112:1 •' ' - • R.,,,c,..0,...•,1,,,ilf.., ...... ...,.., . =,, 5 ".. : ,7.7.1•43:nr..1=' . 111 MILO= I 'i .44...,, 1 .4.,.. ': tuiLAPANY dIAPL 1.EPTElike LANDSCAPE Ski,....t.wa 0.11,....M.r.E6.11...irg,.........•:Li . 71., ........-4:. ...„ ..1.1...4,1-1...41,..44•Jr.41.44.:4.....14......th., PI 11116111111C181109:110:1111311 :. ". *. .....15- ..., .1,•• 1:1,1 1..:I--..- ,t..-71 :---• th.13.. '.1-7,17r. ri•37-1401.+11.11s. P.0.4.•,Oli,5oi..,1,41=•• . 11511/1111/111'01110.5n : i.,,,.----1.1,•1-,F-7.,---5-1-11 l'•IY- hr..:" *.=*f... •,•-yr, z,. . -,•-.1 , StiTta: : . 1:41,1te,11.40.. hIllAVIV2Iii : I_ I =L.. •-i•-•',; -.,,,...--ter''.---1-4-,..-.-e-r17-..r.-;;i:'-17..7" r2....,:44 m'i....,' 'i'.'''',t:..•L,Vt41?--atVkMir:T,:06-" ,...,,1 . • Mal. 111113651,013 . --4.-.,-.3i----ii,-air.:-.1-- ' --.‘- lak•ii:"St.ir,0,...1.....Aout.R..14^..,..0. . eat..Vim Pix1 .• • .-....•.. • i,-.--.--3.,-priS.,;-.4••••:-•-ki....'4;-•-•;WM,- .4••••,..t,...,.,...,/,.,,..,. l'i=1,.i.4.,..,,.....n..4.,.....4i...4,..iv.i.,.4. .,..,.1...,......“.....,.. • eseramn • • , .440 ;•.1...mo.,-..p...:ts: .. .... . . 1.,,,,St.kkt IN•11,..1$44..thryaniallva, • CAUDartliCkfilIIICRIES=AMICUM '..-4-nm--. gi-goo°,0.--'-''',. . • --&-17-1...,7-...-- 6.:of.:--03..k,f1.5;t, ..,. 1 lk,...r..........ter.....4.11... f....,,O,........,ari.;.... 1151/112110111:4132111h ''' •" ..:...' i"-'--1 -Fe- .s. KVA:. -71.43`&47.1474 ....,-.Z.' •,•••veste........to•.....,.....LLILL b H....kr ti.r4f..iVoi:rtii4 • getikg,....,I. r.A. tainairsramimitavem .. , . ....41,..A.,,r) .: wt.:. "ity.h•NUattateirrn Mr P',wi'..'7,.."1-L.,-.1-.11.-zir..7--=',,. .,--............43,- 61113111.14 1'.1.k.4 P....,Diti:11141‘4 ..111121.GatZol .,-.,- .*...-.- T.S15,1i13ard-ma.irt.1. Re.. se,laccat,i,,,114.64,..0.0,2•,(116.11r.ir‘...1• . .1--'..---1;-;.v.,5 .:,•-• ''.•'''''''''''F'1".' /^111.112111.1•131,11,‘...g.a..........t...,,,,• R.11/14.h11.:414 . . • u.o.......,,44h • . . N•CiZZEUX.4.0...."11.1.4.0 641.2 La... • 1111.14..h1:493111. . ,..........o.j.rin,.........,....,....i....,... .._____ .--.-..A.,,_.k.L.._..._ ZA0V•124 . . . . . ......................-4.,..E.*,N7'1111-111. P.--,-,uroika 77 ..11;-.11.• tho.....6..... 40.‘5•411C-21,,,.L.C..4..Y......21....1.akee... • .i.4.-7-ra•tri.-,w."-•-,4,1,--t-.-.... . .--,-'-i'rre...r.L--- :2,101ilt-r.',...-...,,,,"t:.1...... ' . ,,,,,/,,,,..,,r..a. , .,..„*..,,--e- FA,. 1,,11,1,1,1.1.1,411,41111.1.11,11,1,.....1-,4 11111•a . ''' Miii:rerr-. Si-ird;riE.i- o.“ ..!,,...;'.. _ .--,..--.- . ...1''. --.-. .'":4-.--tiya:..7.11,---r;.**1-"li' ***-G****:11*1,''''''',*7**". 14,1i1,A4:..i1i141:04#4 . ''''''''•''' 4.''';'"'"Mr''''''''''''''''''"''"'''''' ".'+-÷'-'..--'---- CONCEPT PLAN ....,....„ . . . ....,,,,....„,.,...,.-.,.-,,..., ... ... . 1......... 0...4,„. ,,,.....,.,...,....„....,.......,...„..,......,:g.„.. .,.,„..„,.,,-.„,..,.,„:: _.... .,th,r,.... - ,..„ . ..........1.4.44,....a ....14-4r ... . 1.r.r1410tr.. 0)dr, rr.nielf,..atiecroN6sts:Vw . 1...ry.1.11..11. --1 SCALE I.-.80':0! EL/I'D-F---C 671-5 21. 7.:.•;,,,,.,-„;-; . .n - . . . • . . crg 0 . . • . • . . . . • • . . . • . . . ,• . . • • CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY I Case No.: ZA01-124 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/15/02 Project Name: Concept Plan—Remington Retirement Community APPLICANT: Veranda Senior Communities / ARCHITECT:Galier, Tolson, French Design Remington/Veranda Southlake, L.P. Associates Ron Howell, Todd Lindley Marc Tolson 12900 Preston Road, Suite 400 8251 Bedford-Euless Rd, Suite 250 Dallas, TX 75230 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 PHONE: (972) 934-3344 PHONE: (817) 514-0584 FAX: (972) 661-0606 FAX: (817) 514-0694 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 02/08/02 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT(817)481-2086 1. Remove the± from the floor area regulations. * The applicant requests approval of the uses and development regulations as noted in the City's staff report and on the face of the Concept Plan. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid.- This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43,Part III"Residential Adjacency Standards"as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan,the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: • Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. • Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended • Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. ' Case No. Attachment D ZA 01-124 Page 1 • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544. Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Depai tiiient. Case No. Attachment D ZA 01-124 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners 1 Remington Retirement Community 1 2 I 5. - yo-c ll pP9 I r 16 1 • � 6 a ©R 14 ,+ t. z 0 06r p 7 1-- 1 1• 13 9 8 1*frr-t l 11 10 L _I I at NNE r - ' 1--- 1 1 li MIS�•,--- r,;- Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. W.Goodell 1. SF-lA 1. Low Density Residential 1. 1.79 2. W.Goodell 2. SF-lA 2. Low Density Residential 2. . 1.63 3. J.Hall 3. SF-lA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.72 4. J.Hall 4. SF-lA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 1.58 5. J.Hall 5. SF-lA 5. Low Density Residential 5. 1.17 6. N.E.Tarrant County 6. CS 6. Low Density Residential 6. 7.03 Baptist Church 7. E.Weisman 7. SF-20A 7. Low Density Residential 7. 13.4 8. R.Reutlinger • 8. SF-20A • 8. Low Density Residential 8. 11.0 9. B.Couch 9. 0-1 9. Low Density Residential 9. 5.00 10. J.Mortazavi 10. AG 10. Low Density Residential 10. 3.08 11. P.Bailey 11. AG 11. Low Density Residential 11. 3.00 12. D.Sammons 12. SF-1A 12. Low Density Residential 12. 4.00 13. Keller,ISD 13. AG 13. Low Density Residential 13. 19.7 14. R.Slayton 14. SF-1A 14. Low Density Residential 14. 7.64 15. R.Slayton 15. SF-lA 15. Low Density Residential 15. 1.22 16. C.Slayton 16. SF-lA 16. Low Density Residential 16. 1.0 17. Lifestyles,Inc. 17. SP-2 . 17. Public/Semi-Public 17. 12.3 18. E.Owen 18. SP-2 18. Public/Semi-Public 18. 10.1 Case No. Attachment E ZA 01-124 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Remington Retirement Community Notices Sent: Fourteen (14) Responses: One response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Ruby Slayton, 2815 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Tx. is opposed.. (Received February 14, 2002) • Ruby Slayton, 2815 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Tx. Withdrawal of protest petition dated 2-12-02. (Received May 30, 2002) Sixty (60) responses were received from outside of the 200' notification area, all being opposed, numerous letters were written with identical format and wording; each type has been identified by an Addendum: Addendum "A" • Jamie Cadiz, 707 Chaucer Ct., Southlake, Tx Addendum "B" • David Carissimi, 1203 Normandy Dr., Southlake, Tx. • Mary Lloyd Jamison, 619 Regency Crossing, Southlake, Tx. • Sherry Berman, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "C" • Jessie Cadiz, 707 Chaucer Ct., Southlake, Tx • Cory Abbot, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "D" • Carolyn Morris, 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Tx Addendum "E" • • Joanna Johnson, Southlake, Tx. ,• Chris Smith, 1500 OakLn., Southlake, Tx • Brandon Baker, Southlake, Tx, • Michelle and Chris Weber, Southlake, Tx • Tony and Cinda Knight, 708 Chaucer Ct., Southlake, Tx • 'Addendum "F" • Eric Milhizer, 452 Marshall Rd, Southlake, Tx Addendum "G" • Richard Montes, Southridge Lakes, Southlake, Tx Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 1 Addendum "H" • Nancy M. Jones, Southlake, Tx, • Kelley Kennedy, Southlake, Tx • James McPhail, Southlake, Tx • Jamie Cadiz, Southlake, Tx" • Robert E. Ward, Southlake, Tx • Glenn F. Young, Southlake, Tx • Laura Roach, Southlake, Tx Addendum "I" • Penny Pannell • Tom Morris • David and Karen Howell • James and Mary Ryniak • Maureen and Mal Fallon • Pat Cockrum • David Ackerman • Liz and Jack Lounsbury • Bruce Johnson • Jicky.Sandow • Shelly Powell • Mike Bevill • - Dan and Barbara Weinberger • Robert K. Hughes •, Jamie S. Wimberly • No name given • Susan Quinn • No name given • Diane Smith • Bernard Ausdenmoore • Tom Kelley • John Saeger • Jim & Suzanne Peckham • Rhett and Angela Higginbotham • J. Scott Smith • Pam Jones • Robert& Christy Ward • Curtis &Kathlyn Woodard • Barbara A. Weinberger • No name given Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 2 • Kurt D. Miller • Steven W. Kettering •- Laura A. Friedman • Robert S. Bennett Addendum "J" • Ed Roach, 1319 Westmont Court, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "K" • Dan Duffy, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "L" • Christopher D. Smith, 1500 Oak Ln., Southlake, Tx. Addendum "M" • Carmen and Allen Mers, 2950 Burney Lane, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "N" • Daniel L. Fink, 603 Llano Court, Southlake, Tx. Addendum "0" • Michael E. Trader, 2701 Derby Ct. Southlake, Tx. Addendum "P" • Michael and Lisa Oleson, 1205 Lansdowne Ct., Southlake, Tx. Addendum"Q" • Hap Lyda, Southlake, Tx. • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 3 Addendum A Dear Commissioner, Thank you for serving the city of Southlake. Many Southlake residents (including seniors), along with numerous citizens who spent many hours working on the original Remington plan, have expressed their concerns about the.proposed changes to Remington. There are facts, research.and history behind the original plan approved in 199.8 and why this proposal should be met with opposition. • The major concerns deal with: 1. The drastic increase-in specific population density(going from 201 units to 36'5). 2. The decrease in age requirement (going from 62 years old to 55). ` These two issues alone, if not accepted as approved, were enough to force Lifestyles, Inc. (the first developer) to abandon their proposal. The many citizens of Southlake support low-impact growth which conforms to the Southla,ke Land Use Plan. These two very important aspects.of Veranda's proposal should be brought into:compliance with What our senior citizens expect and what the former.council:and developer agreed upon. We hope that you will seriously consider:and then reject this higher density proposal and maintain the same lower-density, higher-age- restricted community as the original Remington.proposal. Sincerely, 7:45/ I' k C) RED F E B 2 0 2002 I Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 4 • • Addendum B Lorrie:Fletcher(Herrick) From: David'Carissimi`[dcarissimi@iwatsu:com] I' Sent: Wednesday,February 20,2002 3:10 PM Y. To: Ifletcher©cityofsouthlake:com' - : Dear liorrie: • Please forward the following letter to all 7 Commissioners. Thank you. Dear 'ornissioner, I am very concerned about veranda's proposal to increase ;1,e density-of the R..Minrton Retirement Cornnun rt:y.Sou hlake citizens, seniors and former •-- y council :neav e.r s worked hard to approve Remington in 1998 as a lower density cortununity where our senior citizens • and parents could enjoy uncrowded living-Veranda's proposal almost doubles the number of apartments and will cause; • OVERCROWDED SENIORS OVERBURDENED TOWN SERVICES • HIGHER TAXES PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE HIGH-DENSI' s' APARTMENTS IN SOUTHLAKE"Veranda should he made to comply with the e,:istiny lower density plat., :for .our senior citizens. "'hark you [Cr; r standing up for Sout::l'il.ake'a taxpayers and senior citizens. • Respectfully, David Carizsiiai • 1.2.03 Normandy Drive • 5. • • is 4.{ i.: iY i.h �S. 1- ' i.. • Case No. • Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 5 • Addendum C • • • • Dear Commissioner, `. This Veranda pi oposal for Remington is not good and I think F Fi someone should answer these-questions before they approve this high-density change to a quality retirement community. r• ` What would prevent-any:apartment development-from being built i t• under S-P-2 if this sets theprecedent albeit in a"retireinent"format? .i a What protection:does the city have-if the developer goes'bankrupt and the exclusive:use°for•seniors no longer is viable? Could the city then decree that.it must become a.regular:apart:m.ent i' • complex or the city will be faced with an•abandorted'building,:blight :and a maintenance:nightmare? 3 What is.the issue dealing with lowering the-,age•froin••65 to 55 arid:' ' how would thatiinpact.our community? Please vot:e.against this proposal before it.is too late. Thank yot or taking.the time to.-address-m.y concerns. ` • 11 (.,,• J£'sse Cadiz 707: :dancer-Courrt soutidake TX '76092 RECO'FE'B 2'D'2002 "Ito . ` 1 ; • • • Case No. Att achment ZA 01-124 Page 6 Addendum D • • 403 St.Charles CT. Southlake,'TX 76092 . February.6,.2002 City of Southlake 1111 Planning&Zoning•.commission Southlake,TX111 • Dear.Commissioner.\'ernon'Stansell, I am writing to express my,concern:about the changes being proposed;for the Remington • Retirement•C.onarntiaiity on Syirthlake f3mrlerard by Ver£rnda. t ,111 I was an interested and involved citizen•when:this:original proposal was.presented to the . cc mm.unity.P&L,and City Council. It. as ti plan that vas thoroughly discussed and negotiated fK to gain approval. I support our senior citizens but.the proposed Veranda plan doesnot represent the quality the seniors deserve. r Sonie•of.the concerns I have about'the'Remington Retirement Community are: • • Density—81%.density.:;increase-original"201 beds increased:to 365 beds,•which represents: . higher density than any:of the MF-zoning:allowed iinSouthlnke. , . 3. + Age restrictions—lowered the age.restrictions to 55 instead of62—age.:62 is the age protected bythe'Federal Fair housing Law(age a5.is not)• • SP2 zoning:h 3s,been.approved for the land and•should not•'bechanged Please vote against the proposal by Veranda as`itioesnotmeet the original perimeters ofthe • approved Remington Retirement_Community. • lE Sincerely. • Et Carolyn Morris ETR rr .. w.._E ..,xx..xQ: ,.MG ...........:.... ..: ....w...<a..€ ..TEI.. .....a .. .w..£.n..:..a. ...;_ .._x£.........,..s„ .K.T < Case No. . - Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 7 . . • . . . • Addendum E 4 '.. . . . . , . , Remington,ZA01.424 Page 1,lof.1• , . . .• ••. . ,• •, , - r Lortie•Fletcher(Heerick) . • !: ......,.. .. . From: Christopher Smitr[edsmith2000©compuserVe.corn] , 1 •• a Sent: Monday,February II,2002 12.:50,PM . . • . To: Ifietcher@cityofsoothla ke.com . • , Subject: Remington,ZA01,124- - • i:: • . , Lorrie, :.! • . . 1Ri Mope forWarcl•th.l810 all the:Nam ing,uhd•&ming.clonimits i oilers. Thanks fOryour Illp. . I) . ••, • i''i I am very concerned about:Veranda's higher density proposal for the ' Remingtdn Retirement .Commuhity. • IT Remington was supposed to .be tne retirement community where our senior • •citizens and parents '-c3ota.4'.enjoy uticroWdedJIIVinq In a, rural setting. OUr • HA . 1.998 City'Coundil .approved it-as a idwer density, 201-unit, 1-2 stOry • ' ' . . ri developreat. • • , ' a 0 VERANDA IS TRYING TO TURN IT INTO A SURER. nu7nE5sine. APARTMENT •OOMPLEX FOR ... I, OUR SENIORS BY •PUTTING 365-UNITS. il6 UNITS PER ACRE) INTO 2-3 STORIES. . . . 11!A ,.A ..THIS WOULD EXCEED SOUTHLAKE"S :HIGHEST DENSITY-ALLOWED MD.-SET A ..!:'RECEDEWT FOR FUTURE APARTNENTS. . IT wouLp IVEREASE. TEE-AIEEDFOR.TOWN SERVICES AND.CAUSE- IGHER SOUTHLAE:,:... ..:.:.. ''..... - . • F,A-1 AND OVER GO R CROWDIN FR, OUSENIOR5.'.- . . .. ... . , . ' • • ••- " ,•• - 1,Ai RI Oil Southiake citizens support the current apy!erdenskty plan for Our SeniotS.. . . ,.. . . .. A . • Please' aak Veranda to st4 With theoriginal.,,Ipwr-denaity plan- .,..'....y.y..:,: ", . • .. -A' L ' 1...!.i Thank you for your service to our fine 0(*mUnity, . ' --' , . . • ' AA ' . lAi . .Chris Smith • . ' ' '' • - - •' •• .- O. Ian Oak Ln . . - . . IN . . . . . . Soutil1a.'e, TX 76092 . . ' •' - ' ,.-- ..- l'Al . .• i .... . la • • 14 ' . • - • , • • . . . . . . . .'..-... • ig .. • 4$ • . • h • _ ,.,N • . -. 1.-,,,.! • k. . . ,.•,,fi . . . p4 . . . • . 'f.:1 . • . . i..0 . . ,. . *•,i. . . • • Lii, . . . . . . • • ii!A . • (.1F, . . . . . .,• . • i'::11• , . . . • i.g. . t:A ... ' 2/1.11200; ' , ;!1r; _,,, Case No. . Attachment F ZA 01-124 . . Page 8 • . . Addendum F ' .Piige 1 of.l • f. Lorrie Fletcher(Herrick) From: Eric Milhizer[emilhizer@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday,February 11,2002.5:07 PM To: Ifletcher@cityofsou thla ke.com i. Subject:Veranda'Proposal Lorrie,:please:forward my letter to all sever P&Z Commissioners Thanks, . i Dear P&Z Commissioner, Thank you for serving the city.of Southlake. l` Many Southlake residents(including seniors),along with'numerous.citizens who:spent manyhours working on the original Remington plan,have expressed their concerns-about Veranda?s,proposed changes to Remington. There.are facts,research and history behind the original plan approved in 1998 and why this proposal shotild.be met with opposition. - The major concern deals_with the drastic increase in specific population density(going'from 201 units to 365). • i Higher density would set a'precedent for more of the same from future developers,put a burden.on our town services and cause higher taxes and overcrowding,for our-seniors; 114 Fil The citizens of Southlake support low-impact growth,which conforms to.the Southlake Land Use Plan. The super high,density aspect Of-Veranda's proposal should be'brought into compliance,with what our senior citizens expect and'what theformer council and developer agreed.uporr. t- 11 We hope thatyou will seriously consider and then reject this higher:density proposal and maintain the same i lower-density-community of the original Remington..plan: Eric Milhizer 452 Marshall-Rd. I i l` ii Ki VIII El ('sl ill ir';: l":A 2/12/2002 it, .ZilK ., ,.Z..., <, .,..dk , Z . a a. .-: - _ , . i 7..s. v ,.< < 35!0 A Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 9 Addendum G Page l of.l )_ is Lorrie Fletcher(Herrick) From: richarmontes'[r.montes@gte.netj Sent: Saturday,February 16,2002.3:02-PM To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake.com Subject:.veranda developer Dear p and z members, I am a resident of:Southlake.and concerned about the•new.proposal by Veranda developers to builds-high density apartment complex'for seniors on 1709'west of Davis blvd.l am attending your next meeting but am going on record,now that I ern very mush againstthis effort:I am in:favor of uncrowded senior apartments bUt not density-levels that exceed:,Southlakes allowable.Please vote against this as it Would'other<vise create an unfavorable precedent: Richard:Monies Southridae Lakes I • • 111 • {-I tl Sl yif yy" £y yyi I.5 �{1 2/18/2002 Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 10 . Addendum H Page 1 of:1 Lorne Fletcher(Herrick) From: res0r48x[res0r48xavefizon.net] • ii Sent: Friday,February 15,2002 7:46 PM To: Ifletcher o!cityofsouthla ke.com Subject: Remington Lorrie: Please forward this to all sevenCommissioners. - i . Thank you. l. Dear Commissioner, • I would like to express my appreciation for your service tb our fine,city. 4 • The reason I'm writing you is because I'm very concerned about VERANDA'S PROPOSAL TO.ADD APARTMENTS to the Remington Retirement Community.on 1709,west of.Davis.I feel it is not in the best interests of Southlake citizens,including seniors,for the following reasons: It was supposed to be a retirement community where our senior citizens and parents could enjoy 1. uncrowded living in a rural atmosphere.Our 1998 City'.Council approved it.as a lower density,'201'=unit,1-2 story'development, 4 3 Veranda is trying toturn it into a super high-density'apartment complex for our'seniors.by'putting 365- units(16 units per acre)Into 2:;3stories. Vi Veranda is violating Southlake'a highest density zoning allowed(12-units per acre)by.taking advantage'of `,i the intent of Site'Plan District Zoning,which is supposed to prevent this very'sort of high-impact development.. is This will.overcrowd our seniors,and'set the precedent for'future apartments. According to the_Southlake Projected Population Report,.our build-out timit'of 35,58Q residents is based upon'the: . i z current Land Use Plan.Veranda's super high=density apartments will exceed our current infrastructure i; projections for'street,.water,sewer,police•and.fire services.' - I r-r According to-the'Residential Fiscal Impact Studies done by:tile Center for Urban Policy and Purdue:University; : ! the increased infrastructure demands of Veranda's request will causes higher.and disproportionate°tax !,e burd"emon Southlake's"lower density homeowners. ,. Southiake citizens,including seniors,support the current lower density plan for-our seniors.Please don't. be swayed by Verandas appeals about.their"distinctive architecture,quality-care,luxury,lush landscaping and � ,t special programming."HIGHER DENSITY WILL SET A PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE APARTMENTS;CAUSE HIGHER TAXES AND CROWD OUR SENIORS. • i-: This is an excellent opportunity for you to make the`right decision for all:.of Southlake.Thank you for your • consideration. - James McPhail • • P. js' 2.'1.8'2002 • ; t.s Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 11 Addendum I Page 1 oil Lorrie Fletcher (Herrick) From: PJPannell@aol.com � Sent: Saturday,March 02,2002 11:03 AM To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: (no subject) I am very concerned about the following two issues before our Planning and Zoning Commission on March 7: Issue#1: Veranda's proposal to increase the density of the Remington Retirement Community. --Southlake citizens,seniors and former city council members worked hard to approve Remington in 1998.as a lower density community where our senior citizens and parents could enjoy uncrowded living. --Veranda's proposal almost doubles the number of apartments and will cause overcrowding for our seniors and set a precedent for more apartments. • Issue#2: Very High-Density Housing Ordinance 480-MM (Planned Residential Neighborhood). —480-MM at least triples the specific population density,creates school Pi crowding,permits crime-ridden back alleys and violates the City Charter and Residential Ordinances. Please ask Veranda to comply with the existing lower density plan and do not allow 480-MM(PRN)into our city. They will both overpopulate,overburden town services and cause higher taxes. Thank you for standing up for Southlake's taxpayers and senior citizens. Sincerely, Penny Pannell Ali { REC'D MAR 0.4 2002 • 3/4/2002 :;r t: s :.-w e-.,-.,-GG ...�. ....,w.._-.�:,.. _....�....... ....-N ......,.:.........:..«,...::::,«,...M-.- .. ..,.,......_ -- ..,,,:.. ...,-.,,:.�.. �... :m..ra,..s...x..,�. ,�.....,...,......_.wM 'r r.-:....a..w...W...: Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 12 • • • Addendum J • Opposed to Remington changes and high density proposal(s) Page 1 of 1 • • • Lorrie Fletcher (Herrick) • • From: Edward•Roach.[eroach ca airrnail.netl • Sent: Tuesday, March.05, 2002 12:02 PM - To: Ifletcher@cityo'fsouthlake.com • Cc: Laura Roach • Subject: Opposed to Remington changes and high density proposal(s) Lamle, • am•writing in advance of the March 7th P&Z meeting to ask you to forward this to all commissioners. I. arc strongly opposed to the Remington plan as:altered over time by the developer. This has become a much larger,.higher density, more intensive care facility than previously agreed to in formal and informal compromise between residents and developers/landowners. This is absolutely unacceptable to me in its present form: . • violates the master land use plans • creates a very high densityfacility • represents a. "bait and switch" approach by the developer/landowners that.is against the . • democratic principles of our city government • Secondly, I oppose the creation of The Very.High-.Density Ordinance•4430-MM.(Planned. • Residential Cominu.rnity or PRN) in our city. As written it appears to.allow extremely higher densities than ever before with unacceptable limitations on total land parcel size and.consideration.for adjoining properties. We do riot need multi-family housing in Southlake. Every argument I have heard thu.sfar fails to hold water and.appears to be a ".get-rich quick" scheme for developers/landowners that violates the spirit.and letter of the plans.for building Southlake to be what we all Want. • Nearby multi-family housing exists in Grapevine, Bedford.and other communities • There is not a.Southlake citizen-based demand for this housing Multi-family housing will alter demographic projections for our•schools and.other services • There is an undeniable correlation between higher density and higher crime Please log.and distribute my strong opposition to these two proposals. Thank.you. • • Ed Roach 7.3.19 Wc:'stniont Court Southlake,TX 76092 eroachgairmai 1,n et • 817A24.2387 (home) RECD MAR 0 5 2O02 214.670..4313 (cell) 3/5/2002 • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 13 • Addendum K , Lorrie Fletcher (Herrick) From: Dan Duffy[DDuffy(gEpartnersolutions.com] • • Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:47 PM To: 'ffletcher@dityofsouthlake.com. Lorrie- Please forward this to the P&Z commissioners.... What will your 'historic contribution be to our community'? You are looking out for the interests of those people who live., shop, eat and raise children in Soixthlake. . . .piease.. be diligent in your effort to balance the need for property owners to make a fair profit and the future quality oilife for those wil.c.) choose to make South-lake our home. We only have one opportunity to do this right. . .once the buildings are built, parking lots paved, trees cleared. . .there is no going back. Don't cave under pressure from a pro-real estate, pro-developer city government. They will be long gone when the development is done and we will have to live with the result. Think about all of those communities that allowed Kthart to pave a parking lot, build a large building and now have no prospects of filling the space or having taxes paid to fund local needs. Please be diligent in your efforts and keep a long term view when considering bath of these issues. ISSUE ii: Remington Retirement CoMmunity: The. name belies the fact that the developer, Veranda, has changed the approved, lower-density, independent living community Into, a high-density, hospital-type, institutionalized nursing care .compleK. • IS-SUE 112: Discussion of The Very High-Density Ordinance 480-MN1 (Planned Residential Community or :PRN) : Triples population density ,(6 houses per acre), allows school crowding, back alleys and violates the City Charter. • Permits very high-density development on -a patchwork of parcels with as little -as 5 acres all- over town (many next -to established larce-lot neighborhoods).. M. Dan Duffy REC MAR u,5 200Z 972.582.3606 • D Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are.not the addressee indicated in this message(or responsible:for delivery of the message to such person),you-may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you/your employer do(es)not-consent to Internet-e-mail tnessagesOf this-kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions, • 3/5/2002 • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 . - Page 14 • • • • Addendum L • Lorrie-Eletche_r•(Herrick) • From: ChristopherSrnithr[cdsmith2000@compuserve.com] 'Sent:. Tuesday,March 05,2002 1259 PM • To:. Ifletcher@cityofsouthIake:bom.. Subject: • Remington Retirement Community • Lorrie: Could you forward this to all the_ Planning and Zoning Commissioners; please. Thank you very •much. • Dear 'Commissioner, • • Thank you for your dedication and commitment to our fine community. • This letter is to let you know that I favor Remington as it was first approved by our previous council. I have grave concerns about this new developer's intention for this. qua1..ity. plan. Here are some questions and comments.: • 1. Is Veranda's giant hospital-type complex appropriate in this part of town, where the land use plan calls for low-density homes, not the C-3 (highest impact) commercial-type zoning as its use- .requires? Veranda's Institutional Concept is opposite of the Independent Living intent of the • original plan. .Here is_a .breakdown: NUMBER OF UNITS: INDEPENDENT LIVING/ASSISTED LIVING/NURSING Original Remington (1-2 .stories) : 1.11/60/30 TOTAL-201 **Veranda request -(2-3 stories) : 73/122/160 TOTAL-365 As you can see, the original plan had a majority of Independent Living residences (Iil) . Veranda, even though they double the total number of units, actually has FEWER independent living units (only 73') with the rest being hospital-type, .high-care/.cost rooms (252) . All • the fancy amenities, that Veranda will speak about will really only be accessible to, the non-ambulatory (those capable 'of walking, not the bedridden) 20% of. the residents. 2. CCensus 2000 demographics for Southlake- show that only Sag citizens (4.2% of the population, many obviously independently .living) are 62 or older. Based on this and the • in€ormation'above, will Veranda's expensive hospital concept be economically feasible for middle-income senior citizens and where will they come from? • Assisted Living/Nursing Care facilities -are THE type. of units-that are having the mast bankruptcy problems nationwide. I can -give you 'a list of 30 or more companies, if you • would like, including nine of the country's top nursing horie companies, which have filed • for Chapter '11. bankruptcy protection in. the 'last 2 years.. In addition, the Texas nursing home bankruptcy rate is twice the national average. Is this what we want in Southlake? I believe' that if Veranda were to-go barkrupt, their hospital-type institution, could not even be made into apartments, another undesirable option. 3. Veranda's hospital-type of facility must cost .upwards. of around $50 million. What is the debtleouity ratio? Hopefully it, is at least. 4.5 debt and 55% equity, or watch out! • Who and how many independent investors? Rave the lenders been lined up? What is • Veranda's. track -record? Are they publicly or privately held? 4. During the SPIN meeting, Veranda said that if this first proposal weren't approved, • 'they would still 'want to stay in Southlake and therefore go to Plan R.2 Does 'that mean they would lower the density and increase the more desirable and viable :Independent Living • units? I would hope so. Let's find .Out. • 5. During. the SPIN meeting, Veranda said this Would be a gated community. Is that. legal?• • • 6. Has there been an Economic/Traffic Impact Study done on this proposal with the city choosing. who does it. and Veranda paying for it? • • • REDO MAR 5 ZOOZ ' • • • • Case No. • Attachment F ZA 01-124 • Page 15 7. Will Veranda pay for the required traffie light at Owenswood and. 1709? 6. Who will pay for the eventual street tie-ins at Union Church to the south and future development to the west? 9. Finally, wial it he deed restricted to age 62 or older, as was the original plan? This is. VERY important. here's why: - - The Federal Fair -Housing Act (FFHA) can,only legally 3.age restrict' senior communities that are for those 62 or older. It opens Pandora's litigation box if Southleka allows Veranda the larger market of 55 or bider because, under the Housing for Older Persons • amendment to the FFHA, just who could live in the facility becomes a gray area. Technically„ in the case of 55 or older, up to 2-.0% of the fecility (73 units) could have any age/family combination. This then would put. a greater strain on town services, schools, otc. In closing, I know -this ia. a let of information all at once. I am a long time resident of • Southlake, love my community and her people. I .1).0 want our senior citizens to have a lower density retirement community with. a balance of options with an emphasis on true Independent Living that provides them the dignity and respect they deserve. Veranda's hospital-type institution proposal. is not in keeping with the spirit of Southlake. Let's send them back to the drewing'board. Sincerely, . Christopher D. Smith 1500 Oak Ln. Southlake, TX RECO MAR 0 5 2002 • • • • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 16 • - Addendum M Lorrie Fletcher(Herrick) From: cmers[cmerSgeharter;net] Sent: Tuesday;Mareh.05,2D.02.1.;25:PM To: Itletcher@cityofsouthlake,com Subject: Verandaand:480-MM We have lived in Soutahlake for L4 years and for the -most part are pleased with the growth of our city. 'We. have not allowed high de sity zoning and .the city has prospered. Why with the small. amount Of land left do we want to make 'changes that will negatively impact our residents? We are: adamantly Opposed to Verandas proposed change and to the whole concept • of high density zoning. Sincerely, Carmen and Allen Mars, 2950 Burney Lane, Southlake, 817-.481-8492 • • • RECP fAR 0 5 212 • • • • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 17 Addendum N • Lorrie Fletcher(Herrick) From: Dan Fink[DanF@cookchildrens.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 05,2002 4:50 PM To: Iletcher@cityofsouthlake.com Subject:.Ms. Fletcher-Please forward the following letter to all 7 Commissioners.Thank Ms. Fletcher- Please forward the following letter to all 7 Commissioners.Thank you. Dear Commissioners, I am perplexed about the following issues coming before our Planning.and Zoning Commission on March 7, First, I am very concerned about Veranda's proposal to turn Remington into a hospital-style nursing home. Southlake approved Remington in 1998 as a low density community(201 units), including 111 independent-living residences for our senior citizens and parents. YetVeranda's new proposal almost doubles the density(365 units)and has over 80%of the facility designed for hospital-type assisted/nursing care rooms. I don't understand how this fits within Southlake.master plans! Their land was Master Planned for low-density residential development. This was the original intent of Remington for our community, which I still support. The second issue is the consideration of the Very High-Density Housing Ordinance 480-MM (Planned Residential Neighborhood). Acceptance of this ordiance stands to triple the population density, will most certainly create greater school crowding, and, in my understanding, violates the City Charter. Why is this even under consideration? Sincerely, • • Daniel L. Fink RE 603 Llano Court Southlake, Texas 76092CC002 • • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 18 • • Addendum 0 • • Louie Fletcher (Herrick) From: Mike Trader.[mtrader@brantscompeny.corn] Sent: Tuesday, March.05„2002 532 PM To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake:com Subject: Forward.to•Commissioners Dear Commissioner, • I am very concerned about a couple of issues that are on your immediate radar screen. • .My family and I moved to Southlake for many reasons hut., two of the biggest reasons were the schools and' the fact -that we were comfortable that we• would .not see..a,partments or condos popping up all around us lending to all the traffic, crime, crowding in the schools ect. that accompani;es .such development. Based on what I am hearing about the .changes• Veranda is proposing with Remington and with the change to Housing Ordinance 480-MM this would require., .I am feeling that sense of security evaporating. I sense a feeling of terror and anger. Terror that what we wanted • away from and paid a premium to..get away from is going to sneak. right in under us do to greed and political pressure and. anger that you would allow such a change to occur under your watch when you know many residents moved to .Southlake with the same impressions end expectations that I did. You've heard of the "ole bait and switch", that is what you are potentially creating here. • Please keep Southlake what so Many of us moved here expecting it to be :in the future by preventing these proposed changes. Thank you. 'Michael .E. Trader 2701 Derby Ct. Southlake, TX 70092 Home: 817 251-0182 The Brants Company, Inc. RECD MAR 0 �+ (817) .s39-3128 � MAR 6 2002 • • • • • • • Case No. • Attachment F ZA 01-124 • Page 19 Addendum P Lorrie Fletcher (Herrick) From: Michael:Olesdn'[msoleson@att.netl Sent: Tuesday, March.05, 2002 10:35•PM To: Ifletcner@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Senior'Citizen Residence Please forward to the zoning commissioners. We are adamantly against the.proposal before the.P&Z Cotrurussion.regardh g .the.modificati.on of the planned senior citizen residence. This appears•to be a much larger project than was originally .proposed. Please de.not support this as currently submitted. Michael and Lisa.Oleson 1205 Lansdowne Ct. RED MAR 0 6 2002 • • • • • • • • • • • • Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 20 Addendum Q Lorrie Fletcher (Herrick) From: JTBrankin@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002. 11:06 AM. To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Fwd:Remington Retirement Community Please forward to P&Z and CC, per Mr. Lyda's request. His concerns mirror what I've heard, in general, concerning Remington....that senior care is needed, this proposal looks attractive in many ways, but the density is troublesome to some. Andrea Brankin SPIN#15 431-4108 Andrea Brankin Thanks for updating me on Remington. I have been booked for a program at a school this Thursday night, so will be unable to attend P&Z meeting. I.do have some opinion on Remington: for sure,the density is too high. It is my observation that as density increases,the neighborhood deteriorates. Southlake has such at unique opportunity at this stage in its development to maintain its very high quality of pleasant living . Based on what I have seen elsewhere, Remington's plan would be destructive to our lifestyle in Southlake; furthermore, it would be destructive to property values for our residents who live nearby. I am not opposed to some accommodation for our older residents who need extra-care living facilities, IF such accommodations provide enhancing conditions to our loved ones as they, and then we, grow older. Perhaps the NW corner of'1709 and 1938 could be used for an older-care.facility; but not according to Remington's current plan. Thanks for your gratis service to SPIN and to our Southlake. Please relay my sentiments to P&Z and to the Council:that they and we have the opportunity to maintain and improve the high quality of life that has been bequeathed to us by our predecessors. If we give way to proposals such as Remington's which seeks a monetary profit at the expense of lifestyle, then we all shall reap a less happy future, Hap Lyda R C'D MAR 0 6 200Z Case No. Attachment F ZA 01-124 Page 21 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-275a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING TRACTS 4F,4F1,5M B,-6A1,AND A PORTION OF TRACT 6B SITUATED IN THE- 'JESSE 'G ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT, NO..' 18, AND BEING LY APPROXIN1ATE ;22 558 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM"S P 2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO INCLUDE,PERSONAL CARE;FACILITY, NURSING CARE FACILITY,AND(SENIOR)MULTI,FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO"S P 2"'GENERALIZED;SITE"PLAN`DISTRICT'TO INCLUDE PERSONAL CARE FACILITY, NURSING CARE FACILITY,AND'(SENIOR) MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND (SENIOR) TWO-FAMILY °RESIDENTIAL'USES; AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings,other structures and land for business,industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as '.S-P 2" Generalized Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 1 Site!Plan District to include personal care:facility, nursing,care facility, and (senior) multi,family, residential uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water,sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 2 requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Be_mg Tracts 4F,4F1,'5MB 6A1',''aad aportior of Tract 6B'sit rated m the Jesse G A1lenASurvey,Abstract No 18,andbeing approximately 22 558 acres,and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 3 from"S:P 2"Generalized Site Plan District to mclude;,personal care facility,nursing care facility,and(senior)multi fa ily residential uses to x`S-P 2"Generalized Site Plan DistricttoF include personal care facility,nursing,care fac lityz and w senior multi family residential and (senior) twofamily residential uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporating herein as Exhibit"B"and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health,safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 4 land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. ' That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances,same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being Tracts 4F;=4F1,SAlB 6A1,£and a portion of Tract 6B situated in the Jesse G Allen Survey;' Abstract No 18, and„betrlg approximately;22'558 acres. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRAINT _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING A 22.57 ACRE tract of land located in the.JLSSE G :ALLEN.SURVEY, Ahstract No. 1 S,Tarrani.County,Texas,and being that certain tract of land as conveyed to Lifestyles, no. A Texas Corporation by deed'recordul in Volume 13369,Page 0113, and in Volume 1.3319,Page 0504,of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,said 22.57 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found in the south line of F,M. 1709 (West Southlake. Boulevard);,said.point a:so being the N.E.corner of Lot 1,Block 1 Slayton Addition as recorded in Cabinet"A",Slide 1826,P.R.T.C.'I'. THENCE N kt9"54"a" E, 13.46 feet to a 1/2"iron rod found same being situated at the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE An arc length of 409.54 feet to a curve to the left,with a ocntral.angle of 23°21`00",a radius of 1004.93 feet,a tangent length of 207.65 feet,and u long chord which bears N 78°1:3'57"E,406.72 feet; TI1ENCE N 63'07'30"E, 30.47 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found; THENCE N 66°05'l5" E, 11.13 feet to a I/2"iron rod found; THENCE S 00°01'06"E,889.81 feet to a point; THENCE S s8°47'36" E.330.76 feet to a point; THENCE S O1°l0'02" E,469.80 feet to a point; THENCE NCE S 88°47'36"E,continuing along said north line,84,63 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found,ttttme being situated at the northeast corner of said Joseph Mortazttvi tract; THENCE S 00'22'49' W,continuing along said east line of said Joseph Mortazavi tract,5.02,86 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found; THEN .'E N 89'56'45"W,218.82 feet to a l/L" iron rod found same being situated at the ndrtha tat corner of a_tract of land described in deed to Patricia Ann Bailey in Volume 9866,Pane 1403,D:R.T.C.T.; THENCE N 89"56'45" W,alongthe north line of said Bailey tract, 158.43 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found; 1't t.!INCE N 00'04'35" W, 510.53 feet to.a 1/2"iron rod found; Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 8 THENCE N 88P47.1.8" W, 193.0.4 feet.to a 1/2"'iron rod found; THENCE - S 0001.'06" E. 18410 feet iCra 112" iron rod .round; • THENCE S'8959'49" W. 299,92 foot to a:1/2"ironTod found; THENCE NORTH, 1439:03'feet-to a 112"iron rod found in the-south line of the aforesaid F.M. 1109,(West Southlakc Boulevard);.saidpoint being the POINT or 13,•EGINNI.N.G,.containing 22,57.acres o f land(9[33,1:34 square feet)or land. Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 9 . . • , • . . - .. - . . . . . . , N r) • • . • • . . ..,,.. . ......,„„,_,... . • . it----;:„.„„ • , P)- st,,, - • • • .-.,4,, . .• .• -.:,,:r , , , .., • , ....,.....„..... 1 .,.,, .,..,,....... , ._ . 4.tn it.) p . e.' OUTI LAKE•s if„ P )-. l'''--'74*H,:.i: .r-it;w:ak,-,,...„4-'1=7:._.--;:„..:,.„-,,l-:.A::,,,,,,77:i...,...,4.,,.:::-.,,s„, ,': .,-.:::::;,17.,,,,,i„..,..,'::„.,..:4,1,--'7:f,.,,4,w,'-r:.7.:4:."--t„,j-',I,-;'s:4a*:w::„...,,;m."':„_„..,,t'"'"-•-„,4;,....„,,••„tz-.4,.:,„:"':2fr.':ri;:-,lv7s,„c:ni-r,'--,,.,:17,o-EA,;::.L_-_----7-) .p. ....,. t.„..,„, ....,..,_ - - • t..,w- ,,,...______, ----1 • ,otii u ---• '-p,,--- I-_ -Fri,g•,IR141 1.1rikil sti-...,- - t ta •-t. ; -4 d.' 1.' ,k741-Le1/1"' t-1 '1. I: 'W • . .1 • •:. Vi. 4,.., tart dt,.._,..,.,;010.0.,„,,,,,, , \ = ,.- ::, ht tr_tr.i.01.5.5.i. Odigliti,x'';':.. ,-,.-\ 11• - k 9 1,--.kiii-71,,,„1. ti tilkt - if.i '•••-. '4 11.1,..,,,,... .*,.....kii• t.rm-.4.4,1 st ,4,i,„,:„,..,t,„4-1,1e , k-, 1.mv 4... ...„,,,,,,, ,..,.... ... ;01,i 0-4.:44.'....„.:47--..-. -••• 1 ileA'Y'•-'',.:,-,,,,•.,:-Ir 'F vilrq; ,tirqiiir-,1 s-le- . ' zd '.•:••••.•1.• Q..., R 1. • . ,-..,...-T,..i-rr,--.. , -- , , I . ‘1.9147 .r., ,1. s..-.•'‘..1.31er' 4 '''' -2:,---=----; - ' 41'..'.'...:41:1,- -.. ..,,ii.... , al i!,' 'A.M.7,,..1,...,:,:':?;,77.7iitir...ft- --i,. r i IN Ili - , li - •.il - op - .• • •• I : .2.2.1,1‘, .. AtkNitior,,,,A,,, , \---1 • .60..w,REr.,,___kri..:. :. , ii,„:„.,i 1,,„,,....:_„1-‘,„,„ .",;,:,-a!) bkip'1'-4-,--,.:,_,Iiiiiiitit... ,--‘,14-.,Sruii-i.....0._iiimMii.....;_it..iipt,i'q 1 ..,,,,.,x1-8-11::. ;.:,. ....4,..limr___ii,,,,,,,.:If.r.ohtitil:,,)..._,,..*!„.„,,„_„II \I .4. ..•,4.... itICINIPIIJAP . - Mits44,. ..i.,,."Iiiiii ligrolt.- ! ...T,_. :,....,.:.. . - - -2,-,,---.- --0 -vs' ''''i-',"7-i.Kw,- F,,o .."."--, .,t ,..,,,,,,,., • E• ..,.- .. -.44.1•'-- '',...--=1,--,...atik,'.- „if,:.....N., ....--,,...1.,,,,...,,,,,,..F.44 -rz i .T.,.1 1 g.,,,,, -- .. IttrititlataM, ,•,: V , '')• •• ' '' - .. . " ' I.4 .' =.5.-r-;11. 6141,4-Vita'qA-,.r.:- •-•c,'•••.,..1 4-.• .rizr.__M-• -.1:7'..•,-,....1 -......1:-_ „. Joet._: p.,,,,,•,i,,.,-.''',.10,'.T --. . = = gripRAVer.."11°. '''''''''!""7: I;Ni ,'-‘a.p,y,,...,..,,r.t.i..b.,.\ ,.:4P-774.4.', -,, ,... .4., .; ..-.-_,-,.,,...... ,...-..,-- - .'. ,• ,,,,• ., :,{ . -,---..... • •••,... • . . FE... .,,, rill leativ.,,iss,.?. I.- : AA' < o• . : .. •am.. 14KMILVERITYLLEAS = Ch CONGREG.TE- .= . tam rII.1031.11M/Aial....lerts . ..'if •',..,744 6E6i-riga ar. ;a7.4-,,, 4 CARE Cea..0010.11121(211' E.'.;.'.•',,A69. ..0t..1,111,,,,nit.':.7?!..7'''';' ..Le_.: - :,s. . .00:',1 F.,..ftgai..,:- .,,10 , 14Actfoq, c..=. I 1,1',..T iL,,nnarkilliti ilkijr9ki:i4lim i it.in'jf F."1 I•datteAdl,„.10* :t. II. -,. ,.,....,....,,,Ili , '.,;• _i,N\,, . . .. • ..„. -.-m,r,x,, 7-.3•em...r.,. ,•-",.7-. -..;.,...,_ .,,.,.,iiig,„ni.,..."-iiKvAitigifiktm ,... r„ . efltiKttig,...y,,1.1, :r..- .,. • ,......„, .7. •-:•• ••.' tli.k4t.2•'-1',.21.1.,,.. i . .. . . • • . -C7 / ;.• :417r,,-+tr- 1 iplh 1 P.: '4,1. . -- r... ,I•• i iiii• %.atillt finff,..i , . . ,, .6j..--i-eliai••vd-fig-f2,_:-,..1i.-v7.,...21aRrati: tA„,,,,, SUR DATA SiIMMARY . (B..fitt EA1,1,ittni RtitAti Ro1,.. 62,,m.f .rit. • .,. .. • rri ' •4 Ith,44411INti't4....,1/41...r,r..,..e4T4tnt y..,.i.;.;. .•„.„,,,,..t., :._ „ ?t,-.1:-.....Fleite,„. c.w.o..* >1.1tx,e,,....F.,,,k. triff.1.1.00top.e.,,e,10 .• . • • ' .7'.4142-.'".1R".ditlY4 rtnir " ' *!..•:"4k.F44,,,,,...V.4r.1.4.1e,,i,...•.,4. ig 7.', .x.r..igea tilliwts....31:att . ;Hi Iiikal!".0 fitri'..i,i:91„1';',' ;.,..lik.,1.-'.; '• --' -..,-.41.3'...r.„.,...:11;'7L- r . ,..,,,,,,....... • q ij El • - 1 -q6.51-:-49.,,,,400114,41 ',- rm.. Icitla;/.---'-'14 -...':p....ori.g.,..11,..t....-..,,,,„„_•,-. -18 tt,. ,1:.;'-'.._"4;1•1_, ,..44.1e.7.41,,,Rsal:•., 5 ule 51, . .......511L111hitY.CHART,110eitRi•ARD ',.: , --. -"."11.1.1.,,; .141,,,1"1."41.J,•,.tG134144,& `. enta ......... ... gkLly.0.0,2..&,,,,i.. '''''''''' "..' .ta'?"....,rtt".1 It?'' '1'?.,'t.....-afr--.-• k ... -,.. • ,..,.,,,i,.., , 7...lerl'a l', '•..,P.;.' . . • ' lisiirt , ---- . .•11..... ... fitRiliai4,..... '1;41i.W.'101.1k1-1'"(- REITREMENT COMMUNITY 41 i'ill 1 . r.,-.,,,,-, ...,, ,,..... . . , •.,.• ",,... .,..?--.-.;-,-,.; • EiRt ,,itiltiftett.i..4.5V: tai.i..... . • @OWEN WO0bDRIVEADIMION . --Tr r.v.-.47- a:-,= . - ....1.-11,#.19 • • V./ • '"'''.*4.--..t'-'311:.-1.7-1-Kt--r-•:t_....17."-R-'''-'.•`--- uitsisiawa t 8 6,..4.41.--;...-,........- -..11- . ,. ,,,,,..,,,...„... fraIRICRIan 4. ,laq . ...q.,........,..--,--,.',........rt, '.- q.-,..-.,- -.---- mV;g=r,tt. . . TAILUCCCINIT,TIRM !:0 • • • . vt...- rt- •-rtriti• r----,.--r,-.1,7„,..- • ftgt.rtAwk.ms...... iiEilana1011t2L1YAOCORMOSOLDRint H zi... A.trz - t.a. TOPUSAMILI./[11A131V12.21.1:111111A/IIIMAL .ctuytanti,....q.cuttourtdm . i • I - 1 ....is,.._......_ . • ,.';4-tkirr .-.7-- WW1 Id/117.9GLTINCI =.:• -i - •-)-'-...-÷ !. . _- • -,-,I,tk,,,,-T ---- UMIDITEMTEMMITAMO ' ;U ilii l' - i.,....-,,..,,.. . I pciteR.,rt. . . • IntREWIMERuC1: '...--'litit-g T.,f•• t .•--- --"i•t•••.4.t.Ftitant tiwki 1 i 1„,.., ",...,...,,.w,.:,,, s a • PREitiEfEDURER AN!)CiEtakirettl1ki . , --4.-,7-1.-1 .r-iira...4 . REGULAT1010' R.115_,T.-.4C11R.1,111R•Stet_ inacnvorkgma=maw. . • °: 1.1 it Tigt.,....... -a-;--c.,.. .t.r.tr.t..t ntmtrnt. USODFIL1112111,U)"a- . -t-... ... .P.44. Wan nuatulral . 1 - ,,,.,;...i.r.:-..'4.41V-:-..71 .,..1, 11-=-.....,--r--;aiii...-zr, 4.0:-.-21+10-07.--<.-‘------1 6-fikt'4Tr.q...nri•iwfir. ,.... g.,..4-NA--orarr:"---4-1"--7---a---Mt."-- .'.. -........... i ,1-11. '7 Vr.,....1t,t.•Ot , Ix. . .. . ,-1,7,... .•••••• _ -- • - ''''''''''''''"V:(7,41-trP"M kfaZI ...i., .........4 ;e, il,eai ...... ;St ilth0tEVaIRRT-114R41011.1ANIXCARE ' . '...4.,...i... 1 fzies.eCrt.kW,.t.S4 Minna: ViLU,IRSThriniRkfiMIRS 1.1 .i11 1.; 1...1.. ' 1- 1 . 1:,","."1 ........Ind. not i t.4,I 11..1,•..". ‘Lrtr;4:7 t wo.....a ............____.._wtWatx..t.s•As• 1.tte.1,.. TZ1/01Rat1no-R-T.E11E.E- IST141.1111910AD . - 1 nese,r3.144 if,...Inlot144 gm a ,' 1 a.....-- . I(....,F.,,,,,Y nuistusw ......_........±.__]..............r_L_._,..._................,......... '-',--- . 4":._,.1.......74.....i....14........bt.1:17; -...grf. ,t-'44`,„.,...:---L-ia;r,rsf--:c",,,,,..='Var:SVdaTI-7iij,Zitz.,iw- 1 RUMMERS th...t.1.o.,..41,.,,,.....1..a............. .,Itt:t...v , .,111s.kgrox II,4 ea* Ittaktriat ettgr..31'.1.t',t,"••-s. ••,,,i,....A...:,../a‘a. .5.44:10Xiie F.., , . issk.K.A.,iimhoL*, • . „ Fit‘h.14 . CiU12.10LOCIUNDIDESCIUSCCIMII .7. .i 1 . 4,i441..A.s.',V.4giA,rus...4 !bd..;0014Ett . 1.111111240-01k301. ' I I ,.,.....,..,,....40...,2.4..11.,,..11,.....,11,2,04,,,,11.4, 0.14-64:p..,!,•-a.;•sa- - ANEW • ' j I • 4,•-••-.... 'Zii‘.--S--r met,-,--- ..,.........k..........,14..,:x........,ka........72.1... 1,4y-ii.k.S.we..S.Ie.0.,1 NOIIIIIIIIIIILNDEZATtlaV Ji.r..so,,,muyeatiq 1 •-"T.t'T"5:-.1.47.a....owen.e. ...i.e...,,.....,...-.....‘,.4., s.11,441 rttt,,,r..4..,,tst.lat.11, .01/t.110.31A rAl IMMIX& - . >s ' ••- . '- • ='''''''-... t'""i=1""r ".tft......:71t:13:.'In, •••:r•T•i- 742 grt.- -.tt-• 41‘..,r,•Or.-"r..... i op.,.• Of f,P11.4 Un M.•ria.V.,........,.."..,..;,. ,ttia.amooix.e.reeem...m.ros.,..n.../.. • ..,,O.,,.•••....... la T21,34 i,L.',."1.14 r, • ,,,,...„..,_ ...,...../..,,,b,r,.x.p..4.t.........,..... . -.e,F.r.••41 ...... 1.Z.A011?..1.1 . -c-cra.v.i.:I -•-. • . •.. ...n=mr-.1...tu=r714'1.1.11"...T 1.11:iarj F...rn .. •' fil.7.17.- . ,,tn-S.,n..........p...,.9•.,..... r.17..;.-.;*7,-NkreqX.1....7............,;1!Id:,:IS.jrA.-1.,.."a...i., ---w.,-s•••-•• 14104-§i4,m1.0 l'brlM-- . . :.' ..:11--iiii'-'11,...i,-3-1"-ti--,---r4.-.fr.-- :Z.Vstrf-AV:=."'"" 11"....:X.R11.1.,:tr,ttto11.1,111.1R,Rty.......1 . ,111.,._,t.t1.46•JVC.-..- • °17/ E I 141.4 ....-,i*...........*,............... ''''''''''''' • il ...trs.r 44, '•..ti.,'4.,..,i,:::, 1.1.11 • ....117.4.1.____,____.. .11-. ..........-.---- . 'T4.'11 .. ' l'-. .-7 1-- CONCEPT PLAN .- ...... ...----,- . . '47.t111 1 -1. .-.v..,---n....,,,,,, :;......1=t ,..)l.0:16'4 .... ,t-,-.,..ffi....;:i. .'''' ,..e.,4•.:41........41.n,.t.9••• , ,- • i.. , 1 1..,.. • •,....Z.V0 tiy,.....,.,....P..4.1......).7.,,,...ep.ni.,,ost,,... k.....111.,..1..P....„,___ t...7-2.-- .•. .,-...11- ''''''''''''''''''.'." '''' ''''''''"" :t.:i1'711%)-2017ra.. ' '' ---- SCALE:II-11:00 ; RECO I-Ld I L 1 Ok•••1 . ,, rtf.-,1-,,,....4,-1-1 ,...,-.„.-;37.-47.-darx. r7:&,,TE.,-;-.7-t 1-174M1...-...n..,eat. ., i • Y4 . .0 0 ' .• • • • . EXHIBIT "C" 'hspage reserved for City Council motion Case No. Attachment G ZA01-124 Page 11 City of Southlake - Department of Planning Southla e STAFF REPORT May 31, 2002 CASE NO: ZA02-042 PROJECT: Southlake Town Square REQUEST: Cooper&Stebbins,L.P.is requesting approval of a zoning change and concept plan. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading for zoning change and concept plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Developer's Comments (F) Surrounding Property Owner Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (H) Ordinance No. 480-224a (I) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Ben Bryner (481-2086) • Case No. ZA02-042 • BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Cooper& Stebbins, L.P. PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to amend the current NR-PUD zoning to allow single-family attached dwellings, hotels and bed and breakfast type lodging • facilities (removed at request of P & Z) and to add and/or revise related development regulations. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the south side of State Highway 114, north side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and east side of North Carroll Avenue. The proposed townhouses will be east of Central Avenue and off of both sides of Main Street. The townhouses will be adjacent to the Village Center development. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Blocks 1R,2R1, 3R1,4R, 5R, 6, 7, and 8, Southlake Town Square,and Tracts 3, 3A, 2A5, and 2A, R. Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with limited "C-3"uses. REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with hotel, attached single family residential and limited "C-3"uses. HISTORY: -City Council approved a concept plan and a zoning change to "NR-PUD" on January of 1997. -The Development Plan, Site Plan and Preliminary Plat for Phase.1 was approved by City Council on August of 1997. Since that time several stages of development within Phase 1 have been completed. -Phase 2 was approved in April of 2000. -A revised site plan and a revised preliminary plat for Phase 3, Stage 1 was approved in December, 2001 to include restaurant, retail and office uses. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Southlake Town Square is located on the north side of E. Southlake Blvd (FM 1709), the east side of N. Carroll Ave, the south side of State Highway 114, and west of Village Center. Main Street and Central Avenue currently exist within Phase 1 of Southlake • Town Square but terminate at the beginning of the proposed development site. Both streets will be extended as part of the development. New streets (Summit Ave, Elm Street, and Parkridge Blvd) will be dedicated and built with the addition of the residential dwellings. Case No. Attachment A ZA02-042 Page 1 $ All streets will provide on-street parallel parking. Two-car garages will be accessed by private drives along the rear of the lots. Pathways Master Plan The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an eight (8) foot paved, multi-use trail on the north side of E. Southlake Blvd. The trail was shown on a previously approved site plan for Block 23 (adjacent to FM 1709). WATER& SEWER: A 10" sanitary sewer line and a 12"water line run along the north side of E. Southlake Blvd adjacent to the property. P&Z ACTION: May 23,2002,Approved(5-2) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 17, 2002, specifically amending Exhibit A, l.a., Permitted Uses: restricting "hotels" to "full service hotels" and providing a definition and deleting Bed and Breakfast lodging reference; Further, Exhibit A, 2.a., Height for Non-Residential Buildings: adding height restrictions that would allow buildings up to 90' in height north of Division Street only; And, Exhibit A, 2.f., Floor Area: increased to 2,000 sq. ft. minimum. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated May 31, 2002. The associated development plan showing lot and building envelopes and preliminary plat showing proposed subdivision of the affected land area have been tabled until the second reading of this zoning request since both are dependent upon the zoning approval. However, since the development plan shows detail of the proposed residential layout, it has been made part of "Attachment I" of this packet for informational and reference purposes. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2002cases\02-042.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA02-042 Page 2 '4 , - 1 Square I 1 . SouthiValkceinTityowhilnaP mov. NMI MA. Ma 1 .7....z. • 111. ow ' WM lig.. 12:rirsa- Ilitif illuggIgar A MIMI 111 . rill :'!Mlii Ill S ''' -' 111111 111 rk ,alti='iPikl.1.4:-'7,1:t.n4 l'.44.1k‘s, 4 , 111- eti imilitm \s• _ in ....* . t., . ... .. .,„ °`%^ ' - phimilio. tithil!,.$;iiit::•,-;;Mpil';4:1+• -.. - admil.P.4m,. It:i.4.1*,#.7.*Alx;.414t.'rk'34+4.4.-Yi:*,,t, %AIN Via. .0N5 - .lit"IL • 114412:94.\atkIt1C4.4410.:eV,Iii NORMWESTP limmir illtartimilli., r111,,,:ljAV1:13.444:-":41:!,„;7..:4.1a.,P,'';'t',44.% -IIIIIIIIIIIIPPAMIII wilim.-...,FNE°,4.4,444,•,:-;?,N,,:;$14.%°°,„:-Ke",.4.'".2.Zs?Y ?-4111 nal il...Litio,.--,..al/Nfl.*:i„,fl:'.'°54.k4,MV.;41 -•';'7.4%%,:-''''7 OM G -. • cp,p54J Jiro" al tk...,7 3 ,...,,t., diam. CS'is:;.,4%.4:;, ,/•::''.!'',..=. :•Vr,°,7-,>,'',': gi , i,:f;:.,,,,„‘., '''''-",•,"!-'' ,-.." '''-.,.t.'''•-.4.,',.", ‘11, Ill 1:::,,,..1.'.4,:4:71 it r 87 1 it":0;it.:;:;"1"stniiii:;: :7,,,,,,livrii.14t: • • Alillire vr- •‘C, P if••-:':,,?..-.1 too i-' ' - XVII El _ Pima. . 01 •: oke' , 10 i vkos, • 0 _ ' 4-A\ ..f, 54 • 44" illti I I I limir 4-tla 1 1000 0 •1000 2000 3000 Feet *.e..."- ril 11 N W '14-1=1:-.- • --"7N E S • Attachment B • Page 1 Case No. ZA02-042 • • . . . ,-„ • • st.. s ' • ' ; .. I . • ("---- , . . __ . • , .. • c:::. c. • • .• IN) . .--,• ,..= --. . • . • : . • . it....) • • • . • . . • • L';$4.....",. N.,•,, C-3 'N.•..t\ -'4..4.N4t...,, \ \ . • 1(tt,icromro rArsca. . . . . . LUD= .\. .,,.....:, s • -•-. . 4,•,. 2.4.5...111010 • . • likrAll.COMMERCIAINV.'' `,.!'41.'•,,e• ' \ .. Hitrub - -Cm stAnsc- -- e,•r':- • ......: ..._:_. •IIIT I. .: Vok....!“. *.,.•'!•••12,...?..4.,. ‘`..,..\ -1.1.16..\•••,' . g"7 RITIIIViii: - •-; "Sg.,7r' ..,(I.11(6/Y-CAIIHOLL MATH& ..‘,\\.,,,,...,,,,,,,,,,,v, \.\ .AITII6a11:1112L141A1- . c,... t...„:,,,,,,,,, ,•., Amp on - . • v..:alt_s_xii.wig_454',..fr, . . t„. 4,,, \N\ .,.., ••••...„.„.. „...„...:. ,.... . V...5/ :'.. .:;‘,.. `( 2,, -,....4 . '',...,.........e . ic •,14.i,..r.g1LJ;I:[..,•%LiVir.t.- 'gglgig.g711Elfg4g,IF,IIII !...2,1 -----.)-11 „lg.® 1 1, : ® .:".... •`,.,',.$.:i•,-, t•\ -7., -! -.:-. -__ %,.... .:$.4.-*$,,,',.-,\s‘s.—'-'---7----.' . •a _.......--•-• - .:-..-•---:-------.---.., r I•3 lAwIlmyt.1yr -rimig---,i'.': -,,,,E• . •i'.- \'- -....,....".i,•t-7I,...g.,..-,, ..;,-... • -1-• WI I,•IIIIIC 7 '40'.2., i 0 te- ',.°.... `,.5.4 :L''',..4.\-..1. ..'i',2:, 0 rriteuD61' '6•Ck tgli .2T,r1„..,_p,__ntvg .__ .. .503subtly D..\ 0;F.V 1 p i 1 1 ifr. - \\,-.„ :..4w=..:,•,`, / . gt%_4,, 71.,'.=1 ft--,- ,_ • CAM A.-El,.7.10 TI, • ...(...,,,,,,M"..."., 14 -.."'• ! . . rAto . . . .4 I. I ..,.o. \\,..:.,„ - \N,'...,'.....'`'..*\‘.••• grxiiiiitP7is ,.. -moths.mak. . - • d ...,...., .!..” i IliEED USE . ... • git.. , ."';N .,,,,.'••,,.•,:‘,..‘..Z.R2_..4T,•.. ....,.:It\•,..,..,‘,`..‘, I LIVI•ti.,.•AV4.3 - a €i) .../jrs-lk\-• i-- irICWITY. MAP - • . i. — :',...•' .'.. , ‘:,,,4, /, › ..,\`,,.:V4i'ssA...S:., "4. AG ..... ...._._,I.1,___•‘_,......atyi t.rrig-.-- ' - nri ,', 1 ..,,,•,., ' .-„,-',.',Ii : . &.'w \‘%,.-4.„.4.-*,•0,.. .;\.. --- WI • /AIM VIA Pi. • '',wq.,...,Nz.,;,,s:s.:'-.:.,-...,, : t .UD= ,.:i r.i'ves•O 6 \‘'6.,i',...,‘'.5A..i,‘,-4 ' -CE COULIERCL.L • . •. (4 *(P.P.• . ...> •'..4.,\„ ericrilmeskiralck g--. i,:it,' eff.e.r-i- -. .?act 41,.., . ,,, --,?.,,N,-%44.-..s. -K:'• .r.P....- . - • . 4=',.•-,,-,... k,,•.,,,`,..:-. ---- . _ ...1 ifillitrATt!•.g.',..4.,1! •• • - -I/IA.1M. dial.A.stre7ysi i., ex.r.c.x. ... .4*',I,'--'4". ...'.°.:I.,'•.'",, t'24, ...,4 - -:ZI. ..tit,.1 : . • MG 4.1 . '''' '-'--',: '''..5''.•=!'''':,;:-...'-.. tO''''' ilAI•54 • •?"--"\ .12• ..-. 1 - --• • ---, v•....) '-••• - ......'-Agis .,i,.• '",:' • p.._.,.,...- dor . .4•;5-fte,,.. - ,/,/,;N.N...... ''''....s„.,,--‘,'. -1,:‘s,.--:-....:_-.7•-Z..*--',,_ Ii.C.1-:.t.T.,,LiPI.:5,!!.....J.--....... • " iir--'=•_,-.Y.., --:...-,.. - ......----4.4-;..,.a,......,„,, •,...2,, .-;• ••gii • . ,,, •••:, '''.. -•=gg,;.:-,s..,.., =a, '4:..!,..!.•4g5-14,CM.' •• - - 1D-1,_El . , JT. Ai... . . :(10,.. ''' . , - . •„...,.)— ..,-..„. g.- . 0 '" . .r 11,,,p•tro-. r..., . ... „.,....,........ ...,,,, ...... . ,,..„ . • ,..„. ,... „.... . , ...,„. _,,„ ,.,:....,:„.... • ..,..,..... ..u,..„.... • • . bat .' i;kJ. . . twar.talft ' • sa - * 1. 1'.1. / .. ••A, 4 /I/ s, ‘0,- •-.. 'S'S..........,• '.,..? / / ' .sr' 1---- .----"°4-<-4.'s.•••. '''..,os. • — ig.t. . .--• t 4..A i.....ay. i a inn:oil, '--".. ' 6.., .' , •'..,,"/..,/,,/,71:1/4,,,,Tir/ ,-).atw......a1.4%.1...sio Ma:3, - .eir.„,,,...., ...v.,....:______,.. i EOIS.r.i .sognivit,itivtiot4 •,. .1g,!1 '."(t7IN 1 ' . . ''!!!4,.. J:;,, ,... 1.,„7.,/,‘,/ if.f.,5=rr...-:::._, 1•:.:7`.‘....„................,'",47'., • nr-1-•;.-L-7---271,V,7•t! — .•• •gii‘ga II. 'A-g,4g ' ..g....,,,..ggn' 1 I ' ' •./....,/,‘,,,1 :• I!,.• . I......., --•• . ,W1P-P,'•‘- '. .. ....-. ,....1.0..,.r,r,tme lasd , „,®- -•••••-_-_kr,:f1„,.• --.7-\ v_..._/ - iiz,„,„,-,,..//,-1,',.; ' '' .,,.....4-;-, lir --i •mot HA,tar.„_..3.,/1,„._ . rim VILLAGE CENTER ' -—-1•-•-•-•••• ......•r,.u.n. .1 MOMS 64.0...4 ..,':'".', .' / /1 / . '.1, MADE t. . MA'EUIAII1111 .: ' ' / /', .•• /,••Ii7 I;!6A Gta.A.tuvexasszes •-•: imgir,f,,.•147. i, .44";:r.rcitistia ar.0-0.N. . . ie ". fo. j... .;.4. /Y. j•-€) 14'••••.'.,•„4. g-R•tc:!, - giflIPOSg OF ilAN: '1"-tga//,/' (•//- '1 V•4 r.i141a'e 14.-Ve • FikiVitEa.tHtill.W: g!...:!!!.. 3.850,6..6 '.. ..''. 142- .®' \\I\L'' 161;a•:-• '1.--7'' . ' 'arWril'. A . Imait• . • '„2 ""'`',7, ''i/f-,7' 7 ql---0 67a' Z4571T.Illig"Egiec,541%.1.4",.-tt" . it,,,' gi;f• j/::="i...„."`,Wf,1.4"1/;',, i 1; .. LUDF‘ i1.4,72.G ASI G.11.1.Antet Kltilli me iir4I,UVRt• ,,.1 ali.KO s.r. at.co soas .--, • VA 1.. . z-r /57/4'. ;:,,,,,'-,,t13%,,i.f,4':,,,,:ft!,"I, RETAIL COILItIglIbAt P.O.P. ' 14.1.11,31b:D. ,?`?""',,, - - •" " " flgn ..,, 1,1•_.•.,. . •id-- '. -k-7-7'.77 :.:. 1..: -•":3-1.1.1VH. ,:.. ._ '''!':-. -:. •"'elL467'11.7..,11,,,r,.:,415-5A--''f!. - 4-.,' ;if Ill langV.441t.lIail P.?g*, ..4.•,N, lidli.: biltEr'l'•''''' '3154 - Log.3 "'CO ,. 1'---m3lit!Initiniiti.:I TE•M'!..;FE,IiI/Ilila wal.egt 1., ';14....17"-'41.7 1,1'1,,,a.""f. ''''' 4".••;•'.'aj 1;16' ,,_,,...„„ 1.1.1i ACK6 • . ' -‘1!•1 iIi4.: ';• /..i.','.j',.P.'"••.".7.' '61W' . ', ...-V/' 1'(A'.,y,:';/4.,,—,.0) lilliitair41-tilliti' itl'at" . 9 'tffiti'Vr. .:. r.,,..i.;,•1..k.;fin C,11"t,..b. ' — ft.•1..otact57- pi , :•..A L., . . - 1 1 A/r/, //),J„ei-,,-,„ibl,lif___ . . ,......4,....,:. •,(,,,ClItStligOb OFTI.E..rAgg .. . . : 4:7' ', ://, 0 j l''9441 1.)/ 4/4-'.4,-.7.-/, -./...tt'44`.,-.1 ", -rtn. /7/WDIP:/ ii,";-5' .:54'...friir,; ill C) -.--.. • ,....z.(4,11,1/ / ' ^„.,_151,..,/4: ,...... . ...„. ,..... . L. . ....LLIZI-, ..-. . ..r.....` -.i” 4.3" (.1/2+.WHINC/1.11111 USE SIIIII(Algit - ' [onMeil-Gt-g.iFe ritigr,rkamta .., _-. Lw.ar.ort 31•MIL:_mg.t,,t,p,_kr gl,AMITC K,IA 1•••wily .• . .i .. .:„..;::,41,1..-. s-p*pg.---",....,.-...-Lir.._-,-,..;:y--7----7------lia.f.•-r, ..-L-!,..i.r.,1,41;:a—,, .... .. • *.i.c 0 \Is4,0•SED/ 0 2 1 0 8-, A: ilii=tia/11E1 illidit i.4.0. MVO IiiNGY ITT, 1.440 s 2.11 .13. 813 AG AG INIIVE ,-,,, ..„,1166, 1:01"11 ;---"-. a--..1 villit IP te 1141 P1511tV_RIPI.LIES LIMY= 'VITtfitittior CI: REVISED CONCEPT PLAN 0.-- .,...t.?11.44:14 ro..-. ..SP-2 - MED:DENSfEi LUD=, I [Picots DIZ1DPITIAL - LIED.DENSILI LUD= - SP-2 ''..4•'-''• 400,67/1 3 bl \ til-tItitirit Mit 11,-4:-''' PALM DISIDiGT EPSIDELITIAL OFFICE COIDLEECJAL milou Atill TIM SOUTHLAkE TOWN SQUARE - Liu, . A, time sOsz LI D= FelliVtAtt ml:K • • CF.13. DF•ICE art'MAI'g,2002 or EGLIDILAKE lAtittbIl C.C1IIIIL,TEXAS 1.1, ' oPrict CommEimikt. BP-4 GOA!,EECLU. 0 • GGREIG I ADDITA01 . cm ot StilIMPICE — 7), • .• Vil,ti,,VIV‘1%..k.li ••.', e.R.l',C,1,„ ( ._ _-, ,•3,1-YEllill E.,kgri MgfAtinlil lit: ......1 ._____REC D .. MAY 1.5 111t12 . .....„,..„...,...i,i.., ,.....„-;„,„,....,.. ron-"-;'Tan'"1"11-g411,112EVMM so tir,;61,5`.4.,11C.'171.Aa e-I,- 1°•'•'*'''---Gratiorn AtSocif tear.. M ' • . Wi......t.....4,..unfo,••••an r) . • 5 '''''Z CAST HO,7.102-04T ...ea-C.,oi .:...;..- ...1 . _1!........*•=-•ts. 7- . . . . ................_......... W '. ICI t:$ • , eD t-t• • , . 1-, n . • . . , . . . - • • - . . • . . , • FxIf.IBIT A FIRST AMENDMENT To SOUTHLAKE TOWN'SQUARE P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance Number 480-224 is proposed-to be amended as.set forth below. The following :developm..ent.regulations and standards shall be applicable.and shall control to the extent: of any conflict with any other P.U.D. Development Regulations; Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Upon approval, the provisions below would be incorporated into a comprehensive Amended and Restated Development Regulations for the.Sout lake Town Square P.U.D. 1.0 Use Regulations • • a. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are hereby amended to include the • following additional uses: Full Service Hotels, which shall be defined as buildings with habitable rooms or suites which are reserved for transient guests who rent the rooms or suites on a daily basis,and with: (i) a minimum area-of 310 square feet in each guestroom; either (a) a full service restaurant with full .kitchen facilities providing service to the general public; or .(l) provided_thatt.hotel guests have:access to not less than four(4)full:service restaurants. operating within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D., a kitchen on • the premises in which meals are prepared by the management or.a, concessionaire of the management for room service delivery;. '(iti) on-site: staff required seven (7) days :a week, twenty-four (24) hours per day; and • <iv) a minimum Of one thousand. (.1,000) square feet of 'meeting or • conference rooms. • Residential (subject to the supplemental development-regulations set forth below) single-family attached dwellings;generally in accordance w:i.th the regulations established under Section .1.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, SF-20B Single Family Residential District,.as modified herein. 2.0 Development Regulations: The following P.U.D. development regulations .are amended:and supplemented as set forth below. Introduction:of residential uses allows the creation- of residential districts within South lake Town. Square that are recognized 'as a desirable form'of downtown living, and provide standards.that will protect and encourage various-types ofsingle-family dwellings within.Southlake Town. Square. The..Residential District provides minimum standards as set'forth below. a, Height. No residential building or structure shall,exceed three (3) stories, nor shall it.be-less.than twenty feet (20').in,height or exceed-fifty=two feet (52') in height. Non-residential buildings shill.not be less than.twenty • Case No. Attachment C ZA02-042 Page 2 • feet (20').in.height nor more than fifty-two•feet(52') in.height; provided, • however, :non-residential buildings located on blocks. north of Division • Street or adjacent •to Highway 1.1.4 shall be permitted up to ninety feet (90') in height. Subject to the foregoing height restriction,.there shall be no limit on the number of stories permitted for non-residential buildings. . • The provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 43.9.c.1(h) shall not apply within the Soutlilake Town Square•P:TJ.D. b. Front Yard. No front yard shall .be requited. Where .a front yard is provided, porches, stairs and•other architectural elements may project•into • such yard, up to the lot line. The maximum. front yard setback shall be • fifteen feet(.1.5'). • c. Side Yard. Residential dwellings may be attached. Accordingly, there .shall be no side yard, except on corner lots,where the side yard adjacent to the street.may be up to a maximum of'fifteen feet(15'). • d. Rear Yard. There.shall be a rear yard:of not less than five feet (5'). The maximum rear yard setback shall be ten feet (10'). e. • Maximum Lot Coverage. There shall be no maximum lot coverage. f. Lot Area. The minimum area .of.a lot shall be (a) one thousand six • hundred. eighty-seven (1,687) square feet for residences with detached garages, and (b).one thousand one hundred twenty-five (1,125).square feet for residences with.attached garages. • g. Lot Dimensions. Each lot shall.have a Minimum width of twenty-two and. one-half feet (22.5'). The minimum lot depth is:.(i) seventy-five feet(75') • for residences with detached garages; and (ii) fifty feet (50').for residences with attached garages. h. Floor Area. Each dwelling unit shall•contain a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of:gross-floor area. i. Maximum Residential Density. The m.aximum 'number of lots. allowed shall be spedified :in the Development Plan filed in .conjunction with 'a request for residential development within the P.U.D. j. Parking .(i) Two (2). off-street parking spaces must be provided for each dwellingunit. {ii) One (i) on-street parking space must be provided for each dwelling.unit. Case No. Attachment C ZA02-042 Page 3 • k. Electrical Service. A lot for a single-family use may be supplied by not more-than one electrical utility service,.and metered by not more than-..one electrical meter. . 1. Building Limitations (i) All residential structures (in.cluding residential garages) are required to be .spriuiklered; provided that a. series of attached structures may be combined and treated as a single structure. (ii) All residential structures shall be designed and built similar in character to the renderings submitted herewith. • (iii) All residential structures shall have all exterior walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty percent(80%) of • said walls, exclusive of windows, doors, roofs, glass construction materials, or sidewalk or Walk-way covers. "Masonry materials" • shall mean and :include brick, stone, rock or other masonry materials of equal characteristics. m. Residential Adjacency Standards. The Residential Adjacency Standards of Section 43, Article III of the Zoning..Ordinance shall .:not apply to residential •development within the P.U.D. Further, the provisions of Section 43 relating to non-residential development in proximity to residential development shall not apply to non-residential development • within the P.U.D., uness applicable due to residential development outside the boundaries of the P.U.D. (i.e., suck-rules :shall not .apply because. of the: development of residential uses within the.P.U.D:). The • . intent of this Section is to remove residential adjacency protection and Corridor Overlay regulations from the. development of residential uses within the P.V.D. • n: Curvilinear Streets. The curvilinear street standards specified in..the Subdivision Ordinance shall not 'apply in the Southlake Town Square Residential District. o. Open Space. The Common Open- Space provided within the Soutllake Town Square .P.U.D. shall satisfy the open space requirements for residential uses within the:P.U.D. • Case No. Attachment C ZA02-042 Page 4 • • t ''}-i"a 5 ; ,,aM v' t n , t 'N �u i.;Ei g �• Ilkr•r 2t K • YY`tf P T .. 'RUT • • 3 �'.a wl ,Y L. \a.�.1� • '�F •_• •' i'vt,''6' r t�"� r� H �� . • '7 !I ` `'S �� JF.., di4f v4-,yy� ',(J 7f '1..▪r 5n r 'f- J a C• G K ,...i0f ,' u. it' ri;(qini{ �a'r. ' r 1 • • l t Z % A te` y tr€Et i i i�f r " W V,rr°. -,:: 'k, 1ss y Q /[^♦ ✓ ,..w- � 4 ,.y, �y*,f S`d3S-,�s.t'• • • = s ..:7 31 ,x r S�"J`.. g > � ±�i 3 •,•i r r i^�v` n• fi"�•c S*.C::: di ;ii r ! 4G r 1 ty�tri} is � dF ,7 r�"SSXfG . a I a�" h , i " . " .ate _ _ t l .✓ y '3 ,V,Al,s r s!„ * • a.'s b '�� r{'stx.zs i y� Y ^K24,' i �� 7K ;�T-" t` s "ytix$ Kjn-ti4llsw ✓ isy S � 1'4"[ Ci! J> ��. .t `'� �, C•'c a' s a •• i sl< ,' •3 ,r 1,5 a-., G u �° • '! . tYi l $ er icy- t �'fw 84 ''?. ��'J-' 1 A f 1 '�?i JZ �� ji!. ` t—e n., t " `,', `�.I la ;r ""`,4 g_',t 4.1 b �, c''�f zit •'�"4„.N }" _ z_. r.. 4 . 2 $ S i 41: e:1j" G'+ ~r 3 4.'� )~� 4.1M'� 3, L:fr 2 -�'. " ! } ,P -.. v. s�8 7? W TA',��3':-. Wfi y i.1.• e' i i .. l i n K y g,d; (' t {`""• #Pis , • .r mw .0 I.•:, •Pp. F;:}}15 o "s�` �. '' r I lat 3 ` °: % �. k id r .�,,"4 t '�T" x! ' idA`" fi' . .s p� r�l "�'' e of t��zQ .,i. } Srt�-^^� s• ,'�1-' rP'r' •f` . S� .37�1,.; 1 l i- a cq �5• E "Fr - Crt S.s vaix i,,- i s 4 -. s i'- ;r .s` �-r �'u'' { e''„"` '1`i " T F fi'.+'.`. r3 ,' h�ry - .,Pav 2`'., r iY:5 "3' '� ,F .✓ Y •r b &h�� r w h }d ,,, �, -f• ▪ e, 3+r.t ir0.`i}3}•!�'At m, a„ Z "_. „ 5' 7,r s t 1 ai. �'a:(44, ;•4'�,d.` '..1 ai0 Ai 3 4 r - " � .sr • :s.' �rc.-a 7, a«- A- a t f>, , • s xi. 7, : d , vr_-x I 1 • (;• {' ,r 1. "'�. s r"c..'� �ffi r r rp, O w.:,a r . .: -:j .-,,, :.:;. ..,,,,,,,..at,. .r't''-�+w•tpY-. ..t t! . � �, $ s- .r F:V1 .. '▪ A 'fir t ` { ; r _- : f i ills '3,, x I ,� _r:� V. . •�w�` �r `its` nor, d Y �v rrF'�4 Ki ��,'Rs6 '• ,r 1 'Ys , 'i + b o-2•as, �.. 't r}3" l.r;;., .! a3 �' n� •w . � 't 3 'a^,. }�? ,5;f{: 1��f' Y�.�?s [ A N •,;a. •t %ii • arks s k K ➢S F ± r 1 t xm pw`.%,' #:d 7 e, 1 1 �r w f� < a' s it�'a�E, }ro eM i '"� Y. u 3 i i }. `�. .•`?'" „ .� 4,1 s-L,!€ �€'+t., .� r. h a v u s j Fp i r 7\. v � r { r. a,x4 w±ir4r,`j+.,r ..,"- .,i.,rS c .>.z�.t fk.. J>-;� a �v C ,34*;i 7 4 r t-,-.1-f $'\N. , .5�4,.. iti. q',4 r•E' ,' 1,,... 4r.,,,�.:f4-,,1 s. ) i #x+ x r h r 3 r , t's• j $-}`V",�iii :efi,,44,:+, " r::e-�• };�;! :aF4 t+ L y'- 0it'°`�+tS yyp��4. �� `� a t f s' "4�"^ aC-:�.a � �y�3& f} .:�.,a ��`u Q 5 > 1y 1 �1 ' 1,. � ti ����� � �. 'Irv.� ., y .. z 4 i r v& S,a•. .} r ! .r 1, 'w ,',y' Y , 3, oi - `"'' � L,-:,s #cvsw s .i �s-' ,, ,,,k 3 '.�r :y1 +rL14 ' " ''.F,S'�w``7"'• *; f {�..c 7�V',�,_ " s i4� •. r"'"sk•lyi, "'-r ax�.c r 1"` t f. a 1r 3 .Nf7 #jF, tt. ;. h r ):'�'•>r's, �!'W° m- �j -SSA' LIB !• y,ss• � fir a ', j }' Pit ti -'rSM `� !;� '7 'r'i.2 k..r,G•,'• i J � aC df' 9 ti` d., t 11 d d r t a .. ,•�, i a ti: i rk3r?F n 3�F 'w fyl. "l' ti,i ,,,. ! I i `[ i '.�` 4- ,Z t�S f igr.53' G.i 1 o it I 1 �� - .s� �.,, er,�� 1 �� * r r d I �t rt j d,� S�� ~* ru• is ,, k ' ?• "+r 1 ?�r57y ip ._,.z y, }z,a. x' 33! /�r 74 .a.• 'e3 Y o,.�" ��+{'?�`j -Fw3, S� '�1-1tit•�:r ��' l�g ,f+,!".s` th-wr"'. l tc �.r s 3 L•1 5 �: �'' ' SR � rA+ {� �1 i �� �'1 �3• tt�� i.. ,- j h-);i '4 `T Y4--4, , irj ,lrW ,P !, �� 4;1 ,t i.I ' itt ; a 1,4. ,,,6.'a ' •if' $""?17. t,'yuJay ,� 7 t rF A ! '4 MKS r n� `K'i ais t ,• a{:' a ;44,, I •�i!' ,01..s,4,': 'flit,..?-. ;Y �' : .t k ''"- UUU... , .e� %,, a i t_(y xa { rr iF 4"� Ft�' ''I .F. sL' r, 4r , , •-k-- kf ti41. ' r` , v� / i •4 }_ . r.,,,,:,-is -`ra yv _i'a' _� t , n"ri• !j ae��:� r. '"ti i f�r �t�. } f��+ C l.� 4-r rJfl t i (y�� 0:�c a^r i3 a ± .•a,,u ,o:; - 'C, • i,3 rtf • Y i' �3 a t'� :1 ,i„1�� it fr. '3 rr�, 1'?.5-fit! :f 4 T 'r � r;.r A N.7 tS d 5 4'�,is j`,- ii'` {} i i9; . Cr i ' ( :,f yip .'-w- ' ,.. i'- .?'` '[' ti, s°4 ,., s� i ., �ti _�$i+. s s` s�si r,& •� �! t 1, h • F { q � ,� �y,� -;r� SS.�' � : 3�h•W �• v #zip ��. ...r �R` �; •g:'ti #4-'. 3 s-' ' efy'a y$ � a g ,1 3 k ' t u ! ws .., '� �,K. r FS `...4. ..,. `.,,,,''�,--&- , Q { 4 f,�j` i1 Z �aeu'* )! ,ay,P-Rv r y ,. i� r. Y± z �,,zLXk asi + —r .'Se w v a �" F i 'IAA I31'''41% , �y$. 9"l* 7 • �r:r f 4�L� #.� "�'',L'y-fl `5�,,� ter +T .�' s. sr .1''W,f rn,saP 'a y i T 'sYS,�rr"`'" R. �, /' i ; " i * Ak? `'' ,, t. E r �3 J✓ - `,-,0 k ,xq1 '`-Vile �3-y nr S b _S^ ,a tits_4,- it •fn`! r5'- 11C�C�'-.i� 'l x,+Y,,,, -c r&r Ffy'��. '^7'"u �', 7 . w , ��fb,. �"2y.• f9 .' ;'`,. .. .€Y,l'``b' 't. !t ,���HH77 � -� 'fir,3.3z.i '3 3 .34r y .,' .y ';N --,i-.-l a'"a +` Wa"• -:t, `e c' ,veS*t's-,r. sc: W.i�•r -4 rsr,,, --1 • `c-C. 7:.: s ti_- 'L 5 c i�ham+. J +tea"t,.5,;S ..k'. •-• ��--•.��' ,� `' �' S..r� . `"1 i +. .y, ,u.��t '�•"c.r3-.h I � a�9m!y d yam. ��_�S'k� �,�Ty�,', .::a`r--r"4'y�'="Rzr'.._ ; 4 r'oif' f s 3 irfuP�r,�3�t,`k a•h : ytdc e .:. may. y:1='",y ,-c! a`xa•pi 1}s 2;- ? p, 1:7' a P ;`� z h'. '°S..101 ,y �" "n `.44.5 a®::doh r y < '�. a 0,7"e'� Y R r:c- ,. *64,i .�til2aja5'1 . x- , .s• ,'-,"M-3""�r4.L• 4hr' F 3�, .,f 1 ri `� _ 7 c4i'•estiuefr3'ui`" "''''r� 4 icy--.•-'3'F'3 kt-� 'T> fl-,. �L'., -T.�• ---„-"�,'�� �,,, 'Em'= 7. a 'sr t w'T� 4 �} A --' • ¢, L r+ i` " '!_4F t Sv ,. r3 [ 'F" �" . �f,,-ri ,� p8` 4'-"s1 ' °-r:. s 'a •5:,, _3k`.r- T� - �' 3v^a e 4F X r -.. •} s�r t�Sd, ^s -•n�� a •�f�, 'gq ` � - v f L�'1 x-"f- �i `+�4 ' E ' 't .. +., y .%;:l3 'r;pl__�..—. .-3"r ' 'E`-"m--±'-^^^"' t `. ` «�' .P 4 ..'€' � `, t a -e � , ,A,. ;m"'.r� e i v.� f • y' - :r ,S t • i' 953„G':V P,+. Ir- �T ,�"�q l'- :._"P' �L'& nil h p.), X• AI:, , . �l'i h," } u� x ) s e- gR l''`°.. r"fl ` a '4 cr � # i •fi . f ".r v �.` A5. +- r -37 r 'G k a ,•s5 f 1.,-;,..',_-4,4,,,?.??,,,,,,,,- „" " .**"" m .S.3 , 5 ;,. s' 3�r •3.0ki r'4:ylai >< i sit'-� "°4 ` .ss•p� ��-, ` . J' •ry4�..• ,<r."`. �' c d':4'r' S^.ql), d ,.. .edr �.c.:: a.�s'N', a, Ewa;• njYt .s. ,. Itr)r ; yai3,.:'.. .Ya.- _..: _.2:��, -.li .:�e[.:�;e= .' a..>attrt;,z'Kru.., 7.f' = ". '=mat xrn .4..,..14;kti-`:11 Case No. Attachment C ZA02-042 Page 5 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA02-042 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 05/31/02 Project Name: Revised Concept Plan — Southlake Town Square Residential APPLICANT: Cooper & Stebbins ENGINEER: Graham Associates, Inc. Brian Stebbins David Smith, P.E. 1256 Main Street, Suite 240 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 400 Southlake, TX 76092 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: (817) 329-8400 Phone: (817) 640-8535 Fax: (817) 251-8717 Fax (817) 633-5240 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/15/02 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT(817) 481-2086,DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-2073,OR BRUCE PAYNE AT(817)481-2041. The applicant requests approval of the NRPUD amendments as proposed in the application. Staff recommends the following changes: 1. Regarding the area permitting 90' building heights, change "adjacent to SH 114"to refer to an area within a specific distance of SH 114, using Division Street as a reference. • Additional Plan Requirements: 2. The new street south of Old City Hall must either align with the centerline of Southcrest or be off-set a minimum of 125' according to the Subdivision Ordinance. Staff recommends if not aligned that it be located in alignment with a planned median cut or be a minimum of 200' from any other driveway or street centerline.' 3. Alignments of Parkridge and Division Street and Main Street must meet City Engineering requirements. Streets must be aligned so as not to conflict with driveways on development plans an site plans. 4. Main Street, east of Central must have a minimum 50' R.O.W. for residential use and 60' for commercial/mixed use according to the Subdivision Ordinance. 42' is proposed. 5. Label existing parks and proposed parks. Remove "Open Space" from City Hall site. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone,requiring construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Case No. Attachment D ZA02-042 Page 1 * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a final plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be.paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Street, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Case No. Attachment D ZA02-042 Page 2 • COOPER & STEBBINS Cooper.&Stebbins,LP.,1256 Main Street,Suite 240 Southlake,Texas 76092 Telephone•(817).329=&4(10 Facsimile (817)251-8717 • 'May 29,.2002 • Mr.Dennis Ki_llough Senior Planner Planning Department, City of Southlake 1.400 Main.Street, Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 .Re: Revised Concept Plan,.and Amended Zoning Change Application— SouthlakeTown Square—Case No. ZA02-042 Dear Dennis: Please find:attached a revised set of Development Regulations.in support of our Revised Concept. Plan and Zoning-Change Applications for Soutllake Town Square. Pursuant to out approval from -the :Planning & Zoning Commission on the night .of Thursday, May 23, we have incorporated.thefollowing changes to the•'Zoning Regulations: • Section 1.0a.has been amended to delete"Bed and Breakfast"as a permitted use, and by adding a reference arid definition to'Tull:'Service Hater as a permitted use; ■. Section 2:0a.has been amended to allow.nonresidential.buildings of up to 90 feet tall.on :blocks n tth•of Division Street or adjacent to Highway 114(this includes the block north • of Par1aidge Blvd.,as well as the westernmost blocknerth ofthe:future'5-acre park); : ■ Minimum_gross floor area has been raised from_1.,500 sf to 2,000 sf in Section 2.Of.;and •■ We have expanded Section '2.0i. (Building Standards) to include a design standard (referencing the previously .:provided renderings to establish design intent) and to incorporate a minimum 80.%masonry standard. • The approval by.Planning & Zoning included recommendations raised in Review Summary No. Two dated 5/1.7/02. Pursuant to our discussions on Tuesday, our comments to Review Summary • No.2 are as follows(organized in the order raised in the Review): 1. Agreed(see.revised.Development Regulations,attached). • 2. Agreed.(see revised Development Regulations,attached). 3. As we discussed, :landscape requirements for each •district Within Town Square are individually reviewed. We'believe•that we have provided sufficient landscape details in. • support of the proposed Brownstones, and therefore respectfully request approval as submitted. 4. We will address the new street south of Old City hall concurrently with the submission of a:Site Plan or revised:Plat for that portion of the site. Case No. Attachment E ZA02-042 Page 1 Dennis Killough May 29, 2002. Page 2 5. We will address the alignment of Division Street concurrently with the submission o.f a Site Plan or revised Plat for that portion of the site. We request that Parkridge Blvd. be approved as.submitted. 6. As discussed at the Planning.and Zoning hearing,we have added an additional eight'feet (8') of'RO:W. to Main Street, to provide a.fifty foot.(50'):right-of-way width. 7. Agreed. Changes to the Concept Plan will be made as noted above, and submitted under separate cover. We believe that the above is responsive to the conditions°to approval, arid to the comments raised in Review:Summary No. Two, and look forward to the City Cotuacil's review and consideration. of the Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications at their meeting on the night of Tuesday,June Pursuant to our conversations on Tuesday, we acknowledge that the Revised Concept Plan and. Zoning Change Applications will require 2 readings before the Council, and accordingly request that the City table:.our associated Revised Preliminary Plat and.Development Plan Applications until the next scheduled City Council meeting on June 18. We understand that these Applications will be heard together with the second reading of the Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications on June 18, and will submit revised materials in support of those applications on or before Monday, June 10:, incorporating those comments raised in your Review Summaries of May 1.7 except as.noted in our discussions this past Tuesday. Please.advise if you require these changes prior to June 10. Please feel free to, call me or Brian Stebbins should you have any questions or comments regarding the above. Sincerely, . Frank L.Bliss Executive Vice President Cooper&:Stebbins,L.P. Case No. • Attachment E ZA02-042 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Southlake Town Square III 1 Y ion• 3 *, all . 2 4:1:-:,„..:,S; , R k 4 ♦ } �z 7 7 :1.171 g r R s.: a 1 1i/i111'17A ., .,. -` 26 .111111111111111111W to rA 1 ,: °-,. t.. r jt i ,t ..,� . h 1, 1 K0. {x • 4 1:a .-', rya 2 h 4 Jk g 25 .::''''.,..'.. '.t. .i. ' .. . •,,... e• 12 . K n N . :�.. .e I.� .joy 24 6 a °., .-a�..�t a :.� 4.,,p..B ten,.,.�... °�"� . 5"g �a" r_... --, Fu ¶7 gar scnoHLAKEt - !gig, _I 16 . 17; 18 192C 21_ 'MI l t o Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. Greenway Carroll 1. C3 1. Retail Commercial 1. 10.0 2. City of Southlake 2. CS 2. Mixed Use 2. 2.68 3. Carroll Partners 3. 01 3. Office Commercial 3. 2.89 4. Genesis Financial Grp 4. 01 4. Office Commercial 4. 1.00 5. First Flatiron Inc 5. 01 5. Office Commecial 5. ° 1.02 6. Flagstaff Partners Lp 6. 01 6. Office Commercial 6. 1.67 7. Mystere Ent Inc 7. 01 7. Office Commercial 7. 0.89 8. R.Reece 8. SF-20A 8. Med.Density Residential 8. 0.46 9. M.Wright 9. SF-20A 9. Med.Density Residential 9. 0.53 10. B.Paulsen 10. SF-20A 10. Med.Density Residential 10. 0.47 11. Mendez Ltd 11. AG 11. Med.Density Residential 11. 3.00 12. J.Strunk 12. AG 12. Med.Density Residential 12. 3.00 13. Southlake Venture 13. NR-PUD 13. Med.Density Residential 13. 0.25 14. Southlake Venture 14. SP2 14. Med.Density Residential 14. 0.51 15. Greenway Rowlett 15. SP2 15. Med.Density Residential 15. 1.17 16. A.Prade 16. AG 16. Med.Density Residential 16. 18.0 17. S.Carro11/1709 Ltd 17. SP2 17. Office Commercial 17. 29.1 18. Tx.Health Resource 18. SP2 18. Office Commercial 18. 12.6 19. E.Taylor 19. 01 19. Office Commercial 19. 1.52 20. P.Bruton 20. SP2 20. Office Commercial 20. 1.00 21. Z&E Land 21. C2 21. Office Commercial 21. .1.03 22. G.Miron 22. C2 22. Office Commercial 22. 0.51 23. 98 HM Southlake 23. C3 23. Retail Commercial 23. 2.27 24. First Security Bank 24. C3 24. Retail Commercial 24. 4.68 25. The Shamrock Pipeline 25. C3 25. Retail Commercial 25. 0.70 ,I 26. HD Development 26. C3 26. Retail Commercial 26. 11.5 27. C.Peterka 27. C3 27. Retail Commercial 27. 2.06 Case No. Attachment F ZA02-042 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Southlake Town Square Notices Sent: Twenty-four (24) Responses: Three (3) Subuhi Husain, Southlake, Tx. is opposed. (Received May 29,2002) See Attachment Diane Sarpalius, Southlake, Tx. is opposed.(Received May 24,2002) See Attachment Robert D. Neil, Soutlake, Tx., is opposed. (Received May 24, 2002) See Attachment Case No. Attachment G ZA 02-042 Page 1 Lorrie Fletcher From: subuhi husain,[subuhihusain@yahoo:corn] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:12 AM To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake.corn Subject: residential zoning I as a Southlake resident protest cornercial zoning area to be used for residential housing Subuhi Husain subuhihusain@yahoo.com Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of2002 FIFA World Cup Case No. Attachment G ZA 02-042 Page 2 • Lo.rrie Fletcher From: Sarpalius, Diane[dsarpalius@kpmg:com] Sent: . Thursday,'May 23, 2002 5:12 PM To: 'Ifletcher@cityofsouthlake.com' Subject: Planning,&.Zoning Meeting Tonight • • • Lori: I .would like to voice my opposition to multi-family, high density housing' in Southlake. It is my understanding that there is a meeting tonight and. I would like very much for my opposition to be noted. Diane Sarpalius Administrative Assistant to Ross Garrity / Kent Pennington KPMG Consulting / 972-373-7415 / 972-373-6442 FAX • ******.***********k*9,.*******w.******-**X***w****:w r'***** **.'Akk.*W*k*.q.+...A.****k* The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient; any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in. reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . Case No. • Attachment G ZA 02-042 Page 3 Lorrie Fletcher From; rneil3017@msn.com Sent: Thursday,.May 23,2002 6:46 PM To: Ifletcher@cityofsouthla ke.com Subject: Multi Family Housing Proposal Council Members - I am tota:lly opposed to the multi-family housing proposal for Southlake Town Center. That property is the absolute prime location for commercial retail establishments, and as such, should be limited to these types of businesses. Allowing multi-family units there would in no way help us reduce the $3.3 million budget shortfall. Additionally, such dense housing would require even more schools and contribute an inordinate amount of additional traffic to clog already congested roads. To approve this project would only make the developers very wealthy, and leave the residents with wall to wall houses, impassible roads and even higher taxes. Reject this proposal immediately. Please pass a copy of this email to all the council members prior to discussion of this issue. Robert D. Neil Bob REC!D MAY 2 4 2-02 • Case No. Attachment G ZA 02-042 Page 4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-224a ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCKS 1R,2R1,3R1,-4R,5R,6,7,AND 8, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE,AND TRACTS 3,3A,2A5,AND 2A,SITUATED IN THE RICHARD FADS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 481, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 105.05 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "NR-PUD"NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "C-3," GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AND ANCILLARY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN,INCLUDING PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS,pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other ,structures and land for business,industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health,safety,morals and general welfare,all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned "NR-PUD Non-Residential Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 1 Planned Unit Development District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust;effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 2 made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water,sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: • SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended,is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Blocks 1R, 2R1, 3R1, 4R, 5R, 6, 7, and 8, Southlake Town Square, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in the Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas in Cabinet A,Slides 6888—6889 and Slides 4892-4893,P.R.T.C.T.,and Tracts 3,3A, 2A5,and 2A, situated in the Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No.481,and being approximately 105.05 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "NR-PUD" Non- Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 3 Residential Planned Unit Development District to"NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C-3," General Commercial District uses and ancillary single- family residential uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan,including PUD development standards,'attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections,subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 7 i . o � N O N • • •ca` c •` /�.Dgm'>Lat D �G3� f LUD= " ��`a•oa ``b. `` ,9 mve,'L 155 grail*,1`i (RETAIL COMMERCIAL I UL\ ,c s'.0• NUD= ° f f...e I.[ 'Tait�j 4 :GDer,[r1T-CAMOLL AMMON i ''o``'v•• MIXED USE 's,v ''"'�"-'I�r'Rs' iiu -0t;6j'� �9�`��'] •tti i -..-4 O OT®O.rr PLAT I \ a e \` .IB 1,as n r 31 n _ 'SL u7.11.ON'e?. (ItCOE INTO. I-to3 D) c?`j,,°a' ,; O F 1v1(14.4 •5 1y;t� C15E N0.2101-1D] B 6C pi.0.[null,",1L[mN - F- D leT<-,.\\aac`` Via`\Q4„ n \ [L x \ / �l_1.a nrii'5.1.1,n.L_ �I ' `..iIIu�Qt1_ O ``\:�.fa' \ \ / o;li osnc rc"rs Iu t49., 6 ... r� ``:p`•�` ;:i, RI' lc,` a a ... F+.�@_t IOf 1.BI C T �00 t I) o r;I -_Jo- \' '`i.ern•,."``„v,• O D A--iv ui int �w"-lu •,, iinaF .._;* ,' 6DlRIM1'Rr 110 U Y [ \, •...•,a0 , / (,#- TJ eAe.A..ell E TSB €E CS Y j ® v.u.D. • ao\� "•• !1U(ED USE /� . r',w5',� _"w"" 'F '�"1�[ry1EE g, LUD= \�.`\'�..` ,• ® \ /J�J� � _� F _,,.,, "�I,� a luxRu uss [�,'.:.t:,. ,,,e,rei...,::L, �r�,,, ;;-Pare- w. VICIIIITY IIAP e _ O \\' � ,g 0 CE COM6SERCUL w r—�- J �• J 'iC oaaZ)a`�`:ci�.,.,` 25 'now.54541 PLO u, w ry1. 1;' (, a- Yair. x _ ,are,-.. ����L:> BOURMEW ADaUDN ..vF • e I: ... a.I. h\tea a 4.''.V.I...„ r.,`, a ncou yews,se..e. .•n 1 RUSE1 O O6 / 4. : ,T:`tr`�cg�..a.,-„ ,• 26 ( - g,us1n IKor _.A tl�s_ATC.T. BI Let 1 \'\\ter V 1.• ,—••• PATAT. J • azaa v. `r ae„�'�:`:aa° 1R �n1 u'cr x: LOBl2 (� oN1<e..l' /Lwr°'a.L. ',\\\:aa ` ii 5.5441 n.0 nn./ — Ann /"�r 6 Ja �, \pay V' �a:��`���aaaa`a� • . ssan w. , rwFllar lL.; X ''J / �'.�� ,i 1[ „`lirlw mrct.1T. 4?311 1^�1 < .1•,I ('1af iE i k rpJO% p w // /4,` i 2J ,..0 B.L Lan.E.uv "w 5,3 epre it----"••••:„...<;- C rC B I ` <, . '-_ _- �`•.\L.9::1.• �_v,,.wee vu11.•go, a VW O• L i -s ` s4 `V�. . p n' /'/ _ r,R ..�nw..gL, 1F— HaolmNLwAmmal B -•1 I ?' / _ r,w.[. - B ,st . ,.1 .. PHASED( F-MAI vend I / j%. / /:.•i„,./•I m n. x'i= CAB,A H10E 1]w OI y —o .a \ F '�'' / -"` le'...u"NI1kE cram x'•"'aretd PAT.QT._�__L O y r.uus 1Oue Oefl1<E �.11-7/1 ' PRASE Anrl SI,LYAM J Y OO YDIP.i \\\\\ .7 ://7/f/! A / `II @ MakRIAE]OBJL'CB! ;ORPOSe,or 9 1 n'�uc1E➢10,1Uw,t l,E LOn'I�E']. BLaY uE' ].k60.T,o S.f. • DILI)�u'1`. . woo.54..5 \\' < eT .'j B^-'1'SlT.. uILOIIG[HrtlwF9'IW F.151nG 40 NME B..0'pEs,. ... le ^..`�,.1(1 • �/ r�%/ 'q / /J tl ro i'a: ui r EYA :TL'rn"11iB'�avi'[iu"'u'o So"' wm smms `...n]].[. 1m.Ce•.w/ „// 1; Ali z] C-3 Isav�n.D.w.l�[ oiu �a`meFv°e ° wes / /. /x LUD= 'E �v,uuEA�� • �/ '/ %, /' / RETAIL CO]INERCIAI. .u:D. npmr.u.D. 11Ez r Qw sY. t - W Sirn2 LEL.,4•f ,.T /. "P['x 9 u amlm .v'acs P'�/,,G NI �a 9 AC "Ls� :. / ///�/�/ •/.�,./ 21 Lm, u'uo 05[]rinnw,I<,.Lwvsn r L•.v. PACE 11.11 Awe] d 1!1 k:• r %/ / i1� 1<c]FanE n' 1m�o°'vl'a.D°F°' '' r /1 1 IAnien LpvE,aT ,ABa: 1 1cA1 LDi 1 .o 1lvtM� r a-1 ��.+�r j /791• R I,� A,�,[IN`E�"ri[Ou'EVF0.LOPKn�kQllllv6 Or IGr'g1-l,Onlwu l01 /- .n:ttlIlI 1:,g, a / / /,i rj p 14 r.D.B. [D[au `6[ J '~ kelm� r / �' p I.•nw L..44a reterelei R. [Y.]SlroaD OTiI.0 PAS I sr-2 1�"'', psi a' '�''P % '�` j/• I I O..' �a � e.-44 . 1 _ '21�, ':r• --Tr- / VIE.... a�isi,'„rr;. •%/r,Y '/,P..h • .. In w Ln�41 -��7'-'-i=---- ���) „ • r.Dn zoNINC/WlO Rsc 6eYWm' __ '� • _ 0. 'In mum �_�nwen MM. .. ��.. ).1—• jr,-- -! __________ - u Nye wrw. 1�u B cn.plat MALE na eta L6F8 1 1 Iv loPIP10 u AnEAS wimp P.D.D. n,T .r1n. n r•". IJ Sr2 •1 IS 16 17 o r ID I,....L v111111,r.D.D. mA�EO r . • IA PT10P05E0 �a O-1 le S CI .rrnl,P Iv,m Iexlvmlu uses AC AC �•� DalvE U a,]O NI III urDDST:D ODNCDPf rlu: (� c2 REVISED CONCEPT PLAN LUD= ]DIRRIA6I 1]INnnl[s D , AT rs 'Sr-2 PPaEAS • r P n 1 I1 L P.U.O.DISIRICT poeeo NED,DENSITY LUD= LUD= sr-2 i00-GTA 01 s r[p,;am'`iF�nsiil.L:r-'r' RESIDENTIAL llED. DENSAL L OFFICE COMMERCIAL 'A rtnlwu r`nu< SOUTNLAKE TOWN SQUARE RESIDENTIAL moil ADDITION Sdutut r[0k.. o 1. or zoUmLR:C !"1` CAB.A• 210E 1252 L D= Sou..E wal y p.SI.f.i. T cosOTT O COUNTY,TEXAS LUD= c1E a[O1,nD • L �y9— . OFFICE COMMERCIAL SP-2 CO OF 12CLiL ourrAB1 J. el[°f}1,u'i.' ucl�xArs,.nnm • MAY 6,2002 LDUL GORBUIT ADDITION ,DD-BT `]"°`]""""� MpY 15 S'DL.lae-,56.P6.12 1<FIESf10A10 REC'D • ILTIf6 ioritI m .e B 1v1''SIv,D�Rp�. [o POP WRBW eEY1[W1lHtT ix nrx1,la'"i "�a s' .°v'SBV IIRP"a �,rahom AssociOles Iric.. r�� LMIIIF E['S 1Ni2 x � 1 �xIIfSti ly RIOl�lAirq'1I<n5 hu1 rw ti� � � . --c -m.1 aBpv Ids 4� �ro I�i�Y IBlel„]95-Baiii f1up1�11)lebfw. 0 /E/o2 I CASS ND.:uD:-Dix ... .._ qc • • EXHIBIT A • FIRST AMENDMENT To SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • Ordinance Number 480-224 is.proposed to be amended as set forth below. The following development regulations and standards shall be applicable and shall control to the extent of any conflict with any other P.U.D. Development Regulations, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Upon approval, the provisions below would be incorporated into a comprehensive Amended and Restated Development Regulations for the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. 1.0 Use Regulations • a. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are hereby amended to include the following additional uses: Full Service Hotels, which shall be defined as buildings with habitable rooms or suites which are reserved for transient guests who rent the rooms or suites on a daily basis, and with: • (i) a minimum area of 310 square feet in each guestroom; (ii) either (a) a full service restaurant with full kitchen facilities providing service to the general public; or (b) provided that hotel guests have access to not less than four (4) full service restaurants operating within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D., a kitchen on the premises in which meals are prepared by the management or a concessionaire of the management for room service delivery; (iii) on-site staff required seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours per day; and • (iv) a minimum of one thousand (1,000) square feet of meeting or conference rooms. Residential (subject to the supplemental development regulations set forth below) single-family attached dwellings generally in accordance with the regulations established under Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance, SF-20B Single Family Residential District, as modified herein. • 2.0 Development Regulations: The following P.U.D. development regulations are amended and supplemented.as set forth below. Introduction of residential uses allows the creation of residential districts within Southlake Town Square that are recognized as a desirable form of downtown living, and provide standards that will protect and encourage various types of single-family dwellings within Southlake Town Square. The Residential • District provides minimum standards as set forth below. a. Height. No residential building or structure shall exceed three (3) stories, nor shall it be less than twenty feet (20') in height or exceed fifty-two f feet (52') in height. Non-residential buildings shall not be less than twenty Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 10 • • feet (20') in height nor more than fifty-two feet (52.') in height; provided, • however, non-residential 'buildings located on blocks north of Division Street or adjacent to Highway 114 shall be permitted up to.ninety feet (90') in height. Subject to the foregoing height restriction, there shall be no limit on the number of stories permitted for non-residential buildings. The provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 43.9.c.1(h) shall not apply within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. b. Front Yard. No front yard shall be required. Where a front yard is provided, porches, stairs and other architectural elements may project into such yard, up to the lot line. The maximum front yard setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). c. Side Yard. Residential dwellings may be attached. Accordingly, there shall be no side yard, except on corner lots, where the side yard adjacent to • the street may be up to a maximum of fifteen feet(15'). d. Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard of not less than five feet (5'). The maximum rear yard setback shall be ten feet (10'). e. Maximum Lot Coverage. There shall be no maximum lot coverage. f. Lot Area. The minimum area of a lot shall be (a) one thousand six hundred eighty-seven (1,687) square feet for residences with detached garages, and (b) one thousand one hundred twenty-five (1,125) square feet for residences with attached garages. g. Lot Dimensions. Each lot shall have a minimum width of twenty-two and one-half feet (22.5'). The minimum lot depth is: (i) seventy-five feet (75') for residences with detached garages; and (ii) fifty feet (50') for residences with attached garages. h. Floor Area. Each dwelling unit shall contain a minimum of two.thousand • (2,000) square feet of gross floor area. • i. Maximum Residential Density. The maximum number of lots allowed shall be specified in the Development Plan filed in conjunction with a request for residential development within the P.U.D. j. Parking (i) Two (2) off-street parking .spaces must be provided for each dwelling unit. (ii) One (1) on-street parking space must be provided for each dwelling unit. • Case No. • Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 11 • • • k. Electrical Service. A lot for a single-family use may be supplied by not more than one electrical utility service, and metered by not more than one electrical meter. 1. Building Limitations (i) All residential structures (including residential garages) are required to be sprinklered; provided that. a series of attached structures may be combined and treated as a single"structure. (ii) All residential structures shall be designed and built similar in character to the renderings submitted herewith. (iii) All residential structures shall have all exterior walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty percent (80%) of said walls, exclusive of windows, doors,-roofs, glass construction • materials, or sidewalk or walk-way covers. "Masonry materials" shall mean and include brick, stone, rock or other masonry materials of equal characteristics. rn. Residential Adjacency Standards. The Residential Adjacency Standards of Section 43, Article III of the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply to • residential development within the P.U.D. Further, the provisions of Section 43 relating to non-residential development in proximity to • residential development shall not apply to non-residential development • within the P.U.D., unless applicable due to residential development • outside the boundaries of the P.U.D. (i.e., such rules shall not apply • because of the development of residential uses within the P.U.D.). The intent of this Section is to remove residential adjacency protection and Corridor Overlay regulations.from the development of residential uses Within the P.U.D. n. Curvilinear Streets. The curvilinear street standards specified in the Subdivision Ordinance shall not apply in the Southlake Town Square Residential District. o. Open Space. The Common Open Space provided within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. shall satisfy the open space requirements for residential uses within the P.U.D. • , • Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 12 EXHIBIT"C" This page reserved for the City Council motion. Case No. Attachment H ZA02-042 Page 13 ;4, t COOPER & STEBBINS Cooper&Stebbins,L.P.,1256 Main Street,Suite 240 Southlake,Texas 76092 Telephone(817)329-8400 Facsimile (817)251-8717 May 29,2002 Mr.Dennis Killough Senior Planner Planning Department, City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 Re: Revised Concept Plan, and Amended Zoning Change Application— Southlake Town Square—Case No.ZA02-042 Dear Dennis: Please find attached a revised set of Development Regulations in support of our Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications for Southlake Town Square. Pursuant to our approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission on the night of Thursday, May 23, we have incorporated the following changes to the Zoning Regulations: r _ ■ Section 1.0a.has been amended to delete"Bed and Breakfast" as a permitted use, and by adding a reference and definition to"Full Service Hotel"as a permitted use; ■ Section 2.0a.has been amended to allow non-residential buildings of up to 90 feet tall on blocks north of Division Street or adjacent to Highway 114 (this includes the block north of Parkridge Blvd., as well as the westernmost block north of the future 5 acre park); ■ Minimum gross floor area has been raised from 1,500 sf to 2,000 sf in Section 2.0f.; and ■ We have expanded Section 2.0i. (Building Standards) to include. a design standard. (referencing the previously provided renderings to establish design intent) and to incorporate a minimum 80%masonry standard. The approval by Planning & Zoning included recommendations raised in Review Summary No. Two dated 5/17/02. Pursuant to our discussions on Tuesday, our comments to Review Summary No. 2 are as follows (organized in the order raised in the Review): 1. Agreed(see revised Development Regulations, attached). 2. Agreed(see revised Development Regulations, attached). 3. As we discussed, landscape requirements for each district within Town Square are individually reviewed. We believe that we have provided sufficient landscape details in support of the proposed Brownstones, and therefore respectfully request approval as submitted. r - 4. We will address the new street south of Old City Hall concurrently with the submission of a Site Plan or revised Plat for that portion of the site. REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 Dennis Killough May 29,2002 Page 2 5. We will address the alignment of Division Street concurrently with the submission of a Site Plan or revised Plat for that portion of the site. We request that Parkridge Blvd.be approved as submitted. 6. As discussed at the Planning and Zoning hearing, we have added an additional eight feet (8')of R.O.W.to Main Street,to provide a fifty foot(50')right-of-way width. 7. Agreed. Changes to the Concept Plan will be made as noted above,and submitted under separate cover. We believe that the above is responsive to the conditions to approval,and to the comments raised in Review Summary No. Two, and look forward to the City Council's review and consideration of the Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications at their meeting on the night of Tuesday, June 4. Pursuant to our conversations on Tuesday, we acknowledge that the Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications will require 2 readings before the Council, and accordingly request that the City table our associated Revised Preliminary Plat and Development Plan Applications until the next scheduled City Council meeting on June 18. We understand that these.Applications will be heard together with the second reading of the Revised Concept Plan and Zoning Change Applications on June 18, and will submit revised materials in support of those applications on or before Monday, June 10, incorporating those comments raised in your Review Summaries of May 17 except as noted in our discussions this past Tuesday. Please advise if you require these changes prior to June 10. Please feel free to call me or Brian Stebbins should you have any questions or comments regarding the above. Sincerely, Frank L.Bliss Executive Vice President Cooper&Stebbins,L.P. REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 EXHIBIT A FIRST AMENDMENT To SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance Number 480-224 is proposed to be amended as set forth below. The following development regulations and standards shall be applicable and shall control to the extent of any conflict with any other P.U.D. Development Regulations, Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Upon approval, the provisions below would be incorporated into a comprehensive Amended and Restated Development Regulations for the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. 1.0 Use Regulations a. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are hereby amended to include the following additional uses: Full Service Hotels, which shall be defined as buildings with habitable rooms or suites which are reserved for transient guests who rent the rooms or suites on a daily basis, and with: (i) a minimum area of 310 square feet in each guestroom; (ii) either (a) a full service restaurant with full kitchen facilities providing service to the general public; or (b) provided that hotel guests have access to not less than four (4) full service restaurants operating within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D., a kitchen on the premises in which meals are prepared by the management or a concessionaire of the management for room service delivery; (iii) on-site staff required seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours per day; and (iv) a minimum of one thousand (1,000) square feet of meeting or conference rooms. Residential (subject to the supplemental development regulations set forth below) single-family attached dwellings generally in accordance with the regulations established under Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance, SF-20B Single Family Residential District, as modified herein. 2.0 Development Regulations: The following P.U.D. development regulations are amended and supplemented as set forth below. Introduction of residential uses allows the creation of residential districts within Southlake Town Square that are recognized as a desirable form of downtown living, and provide standards that will protect and encourage various types of single-family dwellings within Southlake Town Square. The Residential District provides minimum standards as set forth below. a. Height. No residential building or structure shall exceed three (3) stories, nor shall it be less than twenty feet (20') in height or exceed fifty-two feet (52') in height. Non-residential buildings shall not be less than twenty REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 I I _ / i ' ill I I /// I ti- I i / // //111//I ll 1 IA I Vid100414b illti ' iWac = Aq ),04041;"1111:8 do a ® cott e �� j l o�plo�s' Wherehet Accor . Yerdi f }ee the side dangly, !+ � :etisPsehtt �11 feet Yard adlaceere ��apelr IItto ��� Y�'d b�c Yard of no k shall be ten feet 1 less than five e• M:nimum feet(S') The Lot Covers geThere shall ben°maximL Ap@a, um lot coverage. The minimum area of a ge. hundred eighty-seven (1,687) s lot shall be (a) on s, and (b) ) square feet for residences a thousand six for garages, esidencds one thousand one h with detached with attached unfired twenty-five (1,125 garages. ) square feet g. Lot Dimensions. Each lot shall have a ralfeetresidences with detached pth is: (1) seven with attached garages; and (ii) fift '-f seventy-five feet(75') garages. y feet(50') for residences h. Floor Area. Each dwelling (2,000) square feet of gross floor shall Contain a minimum of two thousand 1• Maximum Residential Densi ty. The maximum number of shall be specified in the Development Plan filed in on un lots allowed request for residential development within the P.U.D. function with a j. Parking (i) Two (2) off-street parking spaces must be provided for each dwelling unit. / (ii) One (1) on-street parking space must be provided for each dwelling unit. Page 2 CAMy Documents\ResidentialWmendmentOne.doc REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 { : feet (20') in height nor more than fifty-two feet (52') in height; provided, however, non-residential buildings located on blocks north of Division Street or adjacent to Highway 114 shall be permitted up to ninety feet (90') in height. Subject to the foregoing height restriction, there shall be no limit on the number of stories permitted for non-residential buildings. The provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 43.9.c.1(h) shall not apply within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. b. Front Yard. No front yard shall be required. Where a front yard is provided, porches, stairs and other architectural elements may project into such yard, up to the lot line. The maximum front yard setback shall be fifteen feet(15'). c. Side Yard. Residential dwellings may be attached. Accordingly, there shall be no side yard, except on corner lots,where the side yard adjacent to the street may be up to a maximum of fifteen feet(15'). d. Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard of not less than five feet (5'). The maximum rear yard setback shall be ten feet(10'). e. Maximum Lot Coverage. There shall be no maximum lot coverage. f. Lot Area. The minimum area of a lot shall be (a) one thousand six hundred eighty-seven (1,687) square feet for residences with detached garages, and (b) one thousand one hundred twenty-five (1,125) square feet for residences with attached garages. g. Lot Dimensions. Each lot shall have a minimum width of twenty-two and one-half feet (22.5'). The minimum lot depth is: (i) seventy-five feet (75') for residences with detached garages; and(ii) fifty feet(50') for residences with attached garages. h. Floor Area. Each dwelling unit shall contain a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of gross floor area. i. Maximum Residential Density. The maximum number of lots allowed shall be specified in the Development Plan filed in conjunction with a request for residential development within the P.U.D. j. Parking (i) Two (2) off-street parking spaces must be provided for each dwelling unit. (ii) One (1) on-street parking space must be provided for each dwelling unit. Page 2 C:\My Documents\ResidentialWmendmentOne.doc REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 r k. Electrical Service. A lot for a single-family use may be supplied by not more than one electrical utility service, and metered by not more than one electrical meter. 1. Building Limitations (i) All residential structures (including residential garages) are required to be sprinklered; provided that a series of attached structures may be combined and treated as a single structure. (ii) All residential structures shall be designed and built similar in character to the renderings submitted herewith. (iii) All residential structures shall have all exterior walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty percent (80%) of said walls, exclusive of windows, doors, roofs, glass construction materials, or sidewalk or walk-way covers. "Masonry materials" shall mean and include brick, stone, rock or other masonry materials of equal characteristics. m. Residential Adjacency Standards. The Residential Adjacency Standards of Section 43, Article III of the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply to residential development within the P.U.D. Further, the provisions of Section 43 relating to non-residential development in proximity to residential development shall not apply to non-residential development within the P.U.D., unless applicable due to residential development outside the boundaries of the P.U.D. (i.e., such rules shall not apply because of the development of residential uses within the P.U.D.). The intent of this Section is to remove residential adjacency protection and Corridor Overlay regulations from the development of residential uses within the P.U.D. n. Curvilinear Streets. The curvilinear street standards specified in the Subdivision Ordinance shall not apply in the Southlake Town Square Residential District. o. Open Space. The Common Open Space provided within the Southlake Town Square P.U.D. shall satisfy the open space requirements for residential uses within the P.U.D. Page 3 REC'D MAY 3 0 2002 C:\My Documents\Residential\AmendmentOne.doc v. City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 31, 2002 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black,Director of Public Safety(Ext.2421) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Cooper and Stebbins, Southlake Town Square West Side District. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: The "West Side District" is composed of the businesses located in the western portion of Southlake Town Square business district. Nancy Hormann of Cooper and Stebbins, on behalf of the West Side District of Southlake Town Square, is requesting a variance to install signs as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following sections of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A. • Section 17.A. GENERAL: Any sign which is not specifically permitted in Articles V and VI of this ordinance is prohibited. Applicant is proposing to install offsite signs. Offsite signage is not specifically permitted in the aforementioned articles and is therefore prohibited. The installation would include blade signs and a ground sign.,The blade signs are thirty (30) inches long and approximately six (6) inches high. Four blade signs would be suspended beneath the existing "West Side District" directional blade sign located at Prospect Street and seven (7) blade signs would be suspended beneath the existing "West Side District" directional blade sign located at the intersection of Civic Place and State Streets. Each sign would display the names of two businesses. The ground sign is described below. • Section 16. C. GROUND SIGN: Ground signs must be set back a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any property line. Maximum height is three (3) feet. Maximum area is eight square feet with a maximum of four (4) square feet per sign face. Applicant is proposing to install a ground sign consisting of two (2) decorative columns fifty (50) inches tall and set fifty-one (51) inches apart connected by a wrought iron cross member. The cross member supports a hanging sign panel measuring twenty-four(24) inches by forty-six (46) inches for an overall area of approximately eight(8) square feet. The sign would be placed at the entry of the west parking area in the 300 block of N. Carroll Avenue. The sign would identify the West Side District and would display the names of approximately fourteen(14)businesses. Staff Note: The lowest edge of the bottom blade sign is to be no lower than seven(7) feet above grade. 1 Billy Campbell May 31,2002 Page 2 Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Site Plan Ordinance No.704-A, Section 16.C. Sec.17.A Photo Rendition Staff Recommendation: Place the variance request on the June 4, 2002 City Council meeting agenda for disposition. RB/sv 2 s. The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A JEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process.In granting any variance,the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be. accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS C. GROUND SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all ground signs. 2. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15) feet from any property line. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Three feet(3') 4. MAXIMUM AREA: Eight(8)square feet with a maximum of four(4) square feet per sign face. 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1) sign per site. SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS A. GENERAL Any sign which is not specifically permitted in Articles V and VI of this ordinance shall be prohibited. . • 3 OS/22/02 18:29 FAX 8172518717 COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. Ii 002 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLxCANT 99.NER Cif different) . : &o ears 436;K,Sl1,-P ME C E I VH n ADDRESS: /z S6 rla►:i :4(.4 ,Sitae zYo IlingEMIll �oa1la4Ce 7 76O9� iv PHONE: 477.- 379 PM ,- FAX: P/7 - Zc/- 27/7 . The following f,UformaCion eert;,a,ns to the Iocation f:Qr which the variance is being . reaues.ted: . • NAME OF ✓BUSINESS OR OPERATION: RIP sic- Slate eI`V• A t dilate �w't 44,dee PF*YSI.AL ADDRESS: (i)q v 'L.td 51 les a•' 30 6Jod o't tih A' ve l Ave• (2)1 ' 4.4f/�s tiot5 s Opt MIT 3 ma des: (!)a►•t NW e,er.+ee ote Civ„c at Alai , (�)a# ahor. /z'to R.ojweet ---see dole.hls LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot _ Block , Subdivision - I hereby certify that this application is complete- as per the requirements of .Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the city Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, address any unresolved issues, and approve changes, if any. . Applicant's, Signature:, Yt(thill-4/1 Date:, P For City Use Only: . I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199 . Signed: Title: The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign' variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign - Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. . • Completed sign variance request application. . Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance • (see attached.) • Site plan showing .the location of the sign variance'request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt.from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, .landscaped areas, parking & approaches and • adjoining street R.O.W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested. and any other'signs that conform to. or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 4 • . , • • _ S CM'xV.A iEDrslsaavlssra0d1.5011:D • •sa,o�.s»v �;' .,:•avb.h 942ea.a "w. Iy,.►, 4149 .,�t,y • w k irap Si•,fPa/I t.'.c'ds apie. 1-' .rd '41a ,ti a s11,oif vwl pbod aprea."b7d4a /saa/s Cor n/PD,i aSeosA p'Ds9A94.41 97• fo Pqr'''''01• 11b/ • • -aaueutp.zo ubrs aqp • go asoddnd pue gTaTds aq1 torts Auoutzett uT aq rum aouet.x2n aqq gatds l 1 r •sat raolowd .�.-«aVo pf o f Ato"w FiuMJ ' l +• S / R � . P / yt t0 fsPIVT• 1. n bi ICIA,.yb/ 4.141y`.., w17.d sa4ac ate. ,7a. p piety 's f.'weaaat $ F .as,t QA.o.rd f.-z I.a Q.vo viS aft 4actsvire _ s/ Zm+ t$ rah . ag asveLa scaIIca •saTu1adoad quaotcpa go uuatudotanap paaaTwaad puu asn aq� 113TM atRTlVdmoo ATTOW4 aq TZ!M pu>' a.xncu- aou TiTm aouETa2n aq4 'E '.torafl, ano.adk.I '„r bin 's rile so M, int, Sa4fatiny d•aptf pig,, f pity rep"! 7t.1.11"..4" " s ,•,•,I. ar9/yiiac a+ f" a+arr r.M°4 ea' 9"y a .rw 1„..v1- pat:.ip/ r .40...erbfa.a ti rim 144P favor tiny* 't al" dtvsp►by pp.O',.v7a CI,vajec avb f.m.,at r'ierli Tv, #0/1 •pasodtui• ;las lou sr pua Agsado d palaa33E Tia4 of aubTuu sT haTnoT;;TP • ZaaTgat.d s g o dtspzEtj Aaessaoauun alp Butsrtno uoTaun1Ts alp gauz'. -E • 6d0s akf,f. wf.igh,n,t)gAINI718 a y c nto or t 'y ; p>.l ® aoGpg.pg'w,e1 aw . 1--10) "it/ p (y18 S,.�tsa„bar) tia..t� �.•s b pw'e •M' •ffifi S« s®r, at„a, af.9 f'y(iay 4is xcow ' E a' 'ik P''•,�e�a a'fW w� . /o CP° 14 d'"`';"trOW�,p yew t... Mi a+Ff fang,y�a7 7'?\'y�" /s:"' parr d fa/ as-n..0r4, fo s �9 i y 044 aaiaael,. t? ,,414,5. . 'quuottdda 9141 uo 1CltnoT;;Tp TEaisos.d .zo digsp.xQq A.zassaoauun ua ewe ao ITT ► suoTgTn5a.z uSTs at;1 30 luamaazogua texa1TT E '4auy •t • aoLIVTI- n u6ts p44sania= • of ar gsoTrddp su ,M uotgezasuOstraa • • C002 •d"I 'S1ZISS3,LS '9 iI3d000 LTL9T.SZLT9 XV3 OC:9T ZO/ZZ/50 ..........„.............._... — OS/22/02 18:30 FAX 8172518717 COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. a1004 , . : •, . • \ • peofoser) Sive • NW. corneverr . „,r0e...rriricArtb4 (61toifrie)S/64 -,----• ----------- . -----------4-----' ' - • • EXA4A 4e 03 5.0uTHLAKz • TOWN SCLU- AU ._-. ......___. . - • r1:123CA1.W, • . • •-'. %.:.6-*•••41-1—'.1'.... ." " 4 .... • .'t . • • • • • • '. VIE , %•1.*••"' :t I:'; •• • .,;'"'', ' .• .' i•-•':.°7:.."1-g-.77i'T - :•: 4IP -•• • • . . . • -::••: b.,... = 7-r,,, ,'• 1 ', . , ,. - ! .'.....T. . -•-•• 1. ii.„ • , . ‘,.„z, . • ... .•-'• , , ... ,Ji -..- • •.... 1 tri _.i i •' I......: ••••••' ... v. '.•v .!-.. :::,•;"•./i. ....*. SMAtie 07 :• ., ,..t igi±* --,:lie-21k- .z.; ,, ,,- r. - ., 1...i. .?: .-‘,, • ••••.itD-7 Anii :- . ' ;, _ - .,,.1; ‘.1 ":'-''. .X/4,A4f bq • • • ' - - 1MM: ' • fINA • • - •: !-..4...,- ..• 6,. . 2 - ...k<,••.. a• ••..:!...'• .4." '''' -1 • . •: .1.,.. t ....1/... •'' : -. • .‘...."•••. ,....'4, .. ..e.1,... ...'?. .2.11.41)11111t ! . ...Allt;7i...",'I• '.., ..!.' r.,......:.t.,‘411. ., f 7, .'t:-,:.7`‘ ,, =,. .4.,:ti.,•.S.t.,:i..% ., ,, •• !.. ' '. ;L.,/I.. .1, 1 t9 ..• '''- ...TV,. 4.'f (RP ...Z.„,..:-j=k. 19; ,, .cf‘... • .'•• :1:,. a,•;.::: , :: ..., • 4.- 0141 ' , •- ' .4.-1/, .. 'T ,• , k iar.. ....•‘.•,..., .4 , „,,,,,.. : rmcfr, 61P=T, , 11,':- • •-.t.r.•• • `"igi ;'• - • '••. 1,44. i 1 ill Ift . P .; I .t , lilt 2 i%% )1 8,. '‘. . iFt'..... ..• ..., 1.) . - :'...:..1r7 03/11"4 ':..4.41PU-:Pirr.117 t• . 100.‘ '- -....14.t.m.-..Ar .4. , d1/4 • •. . ,.... .... . MI . :',)3,...4....Ya.V.- ..trAt.2..-* • '‘'.",.°1 41'1''.Illarf:r1 - ,. .eS, ••• ..o, • $ • • ' •'• •L-• ' . • : 'At q 0',1.4 k t•fi.• , •N.:'.: 7.4.i.-.1)Pi.. . i: .-,.•. '•': '.'•::.'Z '341-Ktifeig 4' Ma=...'',7241.9,D-Al" s PI: -. .:i • - •z•%.:%/4).• . : ' •_ ,,:...•.•r•;,-,17 I nil WI t.il,“1 faantaltnliagail •,,,,,,, ...,,.... ;,..:!,-;‘,..: •,i.....T., ,,, s'As..... .•' . .. ... .•:. \.--7iiieF.i:P....•-•-7.--.7 Viit'iiiiiie: - . . . ••••• Zilifr• - i *_ „,/. .. . ,.. , .. •, •, .. ,._ . . r . . . ....•\1,7"7e. • • : 7 2-11rIffin" ;- , -17,-..,.,.:24-47 24t7tir 7,-...V54.F7 .- n,:-:. ..,- .. . ' • ... .. .. , ',risk r• 1 .....m•.; •'?1. • i•.; .';'',..;?.' "2,4F36; ...„-i-C-7. it I' 11:. :e.... 'IR ,... .• pl2D,4...n I:: i .:.:•....II:kit:0'14i•...; ;:a - .:• ••A• •• ''''''''.-Ttl T ''-;r.• .:•.: ' ." . : ' ' /' . i 4. . c. ---,• • :'; ....1.4• i' '.;11.ati . . .: : .•.\;7;. .7=3" •' .' ?t'l ' I P • .7.1,4 .......;•• .• "...,, .4 ,...17 . .1.,‘• .. ..am. ...;g iiil ,,,,.=3. L. al .... s'••• -.•.'• _.' "•.... ,-,,..• .r.•••••,Vil.-tor•: -.IS..• I... ';'.-•-...;!.-. .....•' ,. . "...' -7 .37' ':."'- "r.-N.,11.—11:-:,ti. •:•4W1-C• ':I. Vii,,,. %. N4 144. ', , ,.• ••• '. .;i CA'.4,1.- ...IF ••;a..---:-.••.Ov• t ‘' •, • • ' . r b51I2-l'lci-4rt. 1.A—k.lvls-.,:A'.•!:.,.•.....:F.J..NL.. Y-ilM.l.'k. '.wEA t "_•ili.i jiti,k_„__ ?:..tr7:.••..,3,:.Y-......,.„i..re.'.....,.q1j1,7,;•z._ar•.r:f_l1'',='2's•••'..:.1•i.:t•;d•-1c,1: :1n"•.gt°.-:?"N—0,.. n-77'—„.1r5—i: -T,4...........-.=:MV / , 0 • IL.... • ..• tEl o.• . f',1,...t "ts...• •.. tirrrelillin '6.°3.‘ ' ..r. •:1!..-7 ..., 1.; •..•: •'.' •••:.4.-ri 5-. .414 i :••••:'.......-'...''';3:''....44.i.:..;:7:.,. .. '..Z.-•-.;.1.`•-s A'. • ,,\ 4. OM. liaLs9'antileiT :1; ii. 5.,...•-•.:7i ;Isk,;1;•;:...a-. :11.414.00. '-;.- ;' i.:5,. :5:V1•-k:'' el :3; .17.1 ".".S.:. • • ',;.4r.:':.•• • , , . • it • • -• --, . .N\i,,,- ,-.3....40 • :11) -..•• 1"• •-mkt/ 8 -- ,, .--",.. '--. 7, 4.;, -K,'. —• ' .., .7,'..:, •' • Y,Iiti43P ,J--4 1.. ''•• ,-- '•'• • i .-:• .:• - Y=Cei I I•.-— --,...oi-, ,• i.,,,_,,,,, ... 2",i4opr •-•-•- •• ' ' I -.,:v7is'*:19,. - '' ,.•f 10111181. WI 4... 1:F._=,....:. ;:ii 4/77,777,-- . :.- . , .::..... •. . . ; ' .-,..,r ;•-,,or-' ,1,, IM!-Ic.7. .-..-.•:,:._,..-'-'4':.'1-4 61•4400 r''Z•• - k. •,..-,.,,:cLionv r,.... .,.4. .41. ?R.:. ....:' . --'.•-•- • .. '. .111144.14,Zir411.. ;:fir7r,.-441 .. 1 11, .. ,::,k' Ciiiill: ,•;:.-4..:“..'-'..;;•„.;,..d1:'• 'cc/MI.1....;,4,41,......„:., •:,.'.4 .;;L:. ./3C,,,-• . • • i,, 1 H. 4 4 ;•6141 in, 4.57' riiig4..;74•36 ..•;,.f.•, , ' ..•, at c.•, -----,.. -. .) ••,."-= ‘ . i:; -7, ; Mli' ' !treV••::-.': \ ' •••)tg.1"&i: i,....isazo•r. i‘ , Ir-• 4 •I ' .."-.7.t" ' N'es.... ''' ' .J-----" ' •Iik ....\---I---c- ---"`:'-'/Asii. :fir'trien•!-- •,,..1.•f.---,---1 g• ell(1..... . . /..a dna rt, .;C:CI,'''''-...•Vit '1-R'‘. 1.1 VII." i Zr..A.1*i I.i I . 4. ...zeA:., .....•i ,., ....f-i-,•"7..P.l'iV--:,':-.. ,.'&:,1-6,,__,,,, ''''•"7,... '• :--,,,i,—.• . -••_,.7_-•._. "Ii.' -':• I ,.:•,, ..,:,, --• . • ;.•:, ,-•-• -•r: -.- ..'• -• ..rks7,, z,i,/,,..-',,,---'zz•Vilse3.•*•,-..k,avq?••,--V• '-k•cvg.',R,' ''--,-.' • ,.4..ea.:4i4V,..-: • . • •• • u ,+ • - .. .-.•-- • • ••• ..I ram.vimeseetwanend . . . , . . , • -- ---n. 1----- ; I . . .• • • (t ) - • 6 05/22/02 18:32 FAX 8172518717 COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. Z007 • • • j11 • f • 1 • 0 r Cactus Flower Cafe The Rabbit Role. . • 110l Wild Bird Center Regale Fine Cleanerscr_) „ • • re. REB Photo 1 • • Solarcc J (Southlake Dance Academy\ • ( . . Sunshine Glaze ) • . 37'CAST ALUM.TOP FPANI 30"PLAT ALUM.HANGING BLADE • + ib.. 1. er k5;yC;.;: fir... 'c•4.k.w•:Y ll.S.tr-t-1i i!'d• 1 • • .. 4. •4ry ;l.1:l •r: .�i,�,'•+r..r"YF• 4ce ..•• 0 IrC�1r'i''llr.' . • ..ih 4Pii lH�0 �y,, /�J, ki1 "u t-Y�ti r1.-- s, s.• •�: . _ ..- r`erLt' IJrl'r 1 . f - -' "' rat/x ^-term t�a14y3„ �Jq�� ',-' +�'=11 1 'r ', rY L6 "i ,2ri '}`." • 4 :C.l ii --. � MG/Y.4 r ; +... 11i,� w.ti.L c71i�t 1y a lr2 vL�„�1•.4 ,,.` 1'�I:�g�i.1 11 'l i,i•. • E' S "-- ;>. • r ' •Jy•r,;r�,.:„ ••7•N 1.r •1 l rr pP iJ a .. w 3`4 e�1 a . '1 ( •-4 rA) ft-',,�4 9.( • A ft all.I.r i "`t r ••L t ! it >f,� @kti"cs,. ,t .. y .- ' G` , • , �l•„ :•, I ';,' 5 ..4 yam.•ti r'l.Y _`•.3 tl, A. J ,_ H (4 ; C� �` •' - • ,4rf h\'C '' 15 . �I'tr J '+� itt5i ,, '•S �� i,.t ' tlt .. • T �( 5 w o , v1 AA� T, L • `I I)�S l i, It" n 9•�f '",', a:yro r7f.,•i1l>,11•Ps, YM I 4J -L.v'*ln r4,._,1 1i t 1,. . �I f r`• ,.,-9 1 {... ,t i i c L,.._al:,r,.,s. �..-7 ..r1 N^.',f'7,t` i�,-AA- Y •A . tr S J�u, 1,5i,,a,kLL�1'= u�}^4 '�r,,!�.,.r� 1 tr••i f.' (�.�Y1L n`�t•r. eti1}r,5c't.4)...,,r,...' ✓r•e, J_,L J.,-:•rl•�-:- ''.n,Hi7,1L�)-"; •.T!r-t'Mc .t, 1 T.t .�,�J �•'r(lt,T''.�iY..:�'' _n .t•�%wv.•414 `l'.,'4_i' • , • • • • • FAc i�g GJ r AN P o�Pe-4.-r • • • . • • • . • A • ' • Image07 . . Page 7 1)5/22/02 18:32 FAX 8172518717 COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. Z 008 •llll 1 • Storehouse Furniture / ' • C• Gingiss Forinalarear ) • Sendclla's Cafe • 1 (, Stride Rite Shoes , )• 41111 (' Trees ofSunshine theCl Fielazed ) • • Cletus Flower Cafe • The Rabbit Hole Wild Bird Center • • . i. Secals Fine Cleaners • i RE8 Photo .. • • • Sobrte i 1 outhllike Dance Academy • • Cingular Wircicas • • . i , •• •37'CAST ALUM.TOP FRAME • • 30"FLAT.ALUM.HANGIIsG BLADE a \Y�••°`yVN't 'f; ht• '-o.4',.":jl'=i',•, i12::, / ut.tyLi1:0 'F • _,u{s 1 �G 7 A , L r I{• ,- '•y'T�;74*iiik,,A 3,..a ,�"c of�+`'•:J 4>r 1 ti_tr i.2 ro/ �. ',4- ,r.z.C/L'1�,•-,9.(.. li.ir a ti�r++rra I ^i'trr rr� t � �•, � 1 n k � • ? I�Y•C 7"�ri•i ti �?-.?,--•( � Ga,1.1�p1�,••th E it i �� p3.irh �,rr4 t. Su ) , t+ ,� S J is ir8 l({C rtiM1+ti•�� °� o r fI, ,1 tih 'i .. tl4 V I'VIZ...P1 r� ti� 1},1 y'cld•� 4 .e-4}-•'-• •`{ ?r,c.>y}�„"��l(i 1 i�Y1 L 1 L Y • w mn i.•o:)t�;�m,�• C+,e,{0.�i�J.:e-n+ TaCre?21�{ -,, [•..T A� Tl xJ•• , -a lb T; +lY �•'-•�• '{ -0, ..i. � T-•. , 1.:r !f �kk''- r 2rI 1 . -E ...,.�,,. .,, yIIYY etc 1t d, v 1�.r , ) nti,c, s at j�„l �. o, 1,, a4 ...r.11ti,,441.y t i .t�`,<P� o ^ 4,'lc `� t S,'. 4 L;=.h'�.�,`1'. - .�y`l c,y Li r t �n{.4 '�44 �rY'aYY2.`-�l ?2 'lk,,-, ,1 d l4 '1 ,gy,fit° .y �i✓I� •�•', err:, 5,, Cr',1 s.° �i sn "�Y^4• r.Ii' +1'S�xG�`ali' 'r } �r !3 ,�, �+, 7.� .cj. 1(�,, t ';,ai,� c5}n, v�c'c J.ri� n.' d 1t°a Ty,t ,t5:�•s'rc'u c ��;;'�•��a yy 1,i�w r[tx�1'L �Y,f'i ' ,4' +�'''''.''''; • ' 1,:r.F"�' .,kc/' t=.j� (i 4a-. ,fit.{::••• :,4_,' ,,0k• Iii.K-+ 1.• "lc •Xkl ;prv. g, C �. ""-•----r ai3Z �tc� 4; n l,.r aF',;. •� ' r o. .._ Cl Ada } �.s i 1 ',Vt...." r � �. 2-42_ M ,F r 'j`.l. F' ' . ..a ; 7t'� ..m`�hE Y f3 42 1a, ,,, r � � <n.. a,�ii„ nts�. , ,: ca1'�rN' '-..7.. - .,- t . • • i ^ j ` rir"l+' �r 1 !d( 7 � b,1 , 1°'' i i t n , � P � I '4 r � n { yl • ,l tdc�"`.ii 13' )a ;1 -., "i iI ,1yr '• _ � a',.., i 11i r4. 'Liu, l r� I 4QoAV• 3N• ,. y1 4 ''dce„'`7 (: `^':1' a ''''4 n ' d=t1 �v � 1" 1 ;' .7�:n. ".! M t. L, ,5 : . -, 0.,v ? ' ,kY;,. .j%•,:� FyG R„ 4 !1 NRn 9 J 77 ll .;l2a •5 1 t7 a , rC , a • • faC I./ag WIZr OM Ct'1n A'T Sera , • • • • • • • • • • • . • • (----DImage04 Page 8 Pill • - . 02811111121=11=1111121:1011111EllIk, • H • • • , - " I 51 IN. - - I - f -.r ce t • ' y -�91, ..--`'�,��x ac ., .:t!-',--:� ter- I V II ' . ilill @ It ; W� SU O- Bi: - i . tri I-'aviY C:`T;- ; 1 11� ;v i 4 D +o:r - 70. 1• ?)u [1�"sI( (NCI ') i11-,,1ity ;, 9 SZ,. u Storehouse Furniture Stride Rite Shoes The Rabbit Role i _ Cungirs Forroalwear Sonrline Glaze Wild Bird Center t to 1 Sandella's Cafe Trees of the Field Segal's Fioe Cleaners- �; ` Cingular'Wireless Cactus Flower Cafe Southtalce Dance Academy It z' Satarle REB Photo - cr. r• _. - ef . l - . 24x46"OVERALL SIGN FACE lJ � • • PROJECT: SOLITHLAKE TOWN SQUARE DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION _IDE Ail- ii 6 (Illt . SIGN TYPE: TWIN POST HANGING SIGN � •--• MARCH 12„ 2002 • . ...crpert4 Gs Reekrreela74 ol1u4Pe • vr341 sear: NONE SOlrn 1Xu�Fte.-TEXAS 7sosz • (817)329-0411, FAX(8171 4t38-4484 , 05/22/02 18:31 FAX 8172518717 COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. 008 • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • '• • . . • • •'iNWA•ra"F'We`1?<!•••')i' ;IT 11; • 41.I' ‘1, e ' IL. •C' 14', ) AL"M'ic?.;* .311,m), 41Nes'51"';',.4 • 1,Y-Y,G` • 4,eP4r4 7k'').174, •1';cfVft,;i: ; Vil2;•'-')'',If.rV''..riff-L.;1.4k-'ollF.o%4`51'4146'% p•WileirdltiN ;<•Lrt,ro,r,W7'.4; rs,.:AVvI,Mbultrk4.,"1‘T :1(• ;(41,11;1.1,t1/4, •sry • .':i ,-.t747k7. • T-4,.,h'". 1',„"q.'.1 .24 T.die'm/ .• i• • 7—. " i. * •.%.LY• ,:3'fir.4 2'1449• • , 4QT, • -`•44 rd"'',g-••• Sj,/, /r•-k• fi ••,;...1-c:•'...rirli.EVA,../ •''°•5'r.)N1'} A fr,i71 W-Mttf,'":7,GE;,‘'.4 , 1TXra:- '.=-7k-L7'^-1,;• ••,,,-• Y. ' --`,1*4-17.,!Sri,7%;-_,Iil,q, • *fern?s`• rssZgA'. n'-',..eaRt • ' 471,41. • kat ' _ . • /At ct?.A.,W).;:mMs,„ •'1* , • . , , ' l‘ft)4,_ 503•• 1,11437 -',AT • .4.-'---"A'TVii‘ii•ir..41. ^.:;-5<t-,,i -44`t ,OZ4S1,4k1R47.tulg -rairt'1•44,- ,O.k",tiFt2-1-47,4(70 -7fil,tpAtt • --,-, • `:1'' *•51q7s.V.:•172?-11'7;.. ).a`-.".^...:1=5 ;;:rNO,"kr.4'‘ ' • • . . • • • . • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Jr•‘ • • • • • • Image0 8 I • • • Page 10 •