Item 5 - ZBA22-0001Case No. Attachment A
ZBA22-0001 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/ APPLICANT: Samuel Timothy Wiford II
PROPERTY SITUATION: 615 Brewer Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 1, Brewer Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: SF-1B – Single Family Residential District
HISTORY: -The property was annexed in 1988.-A Final Plat for the Brewer Addition was approved May 15, 1990. The zoningon the property at that time was SF-1B.-The “SF-1B” – Single Family Residential District zoning was placed on theproperty with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480-16 and the Official Zoning
Map on April 17, 1990.-A principal residence with approximately 3,980 square feet of livable floorarea was built in 2001 (Source: TAD). An additional accessory structure was
completed in 2010, which increased the total living space on the site toapproximately 6,773 square feet.-On June 25, 2009, the ZBA approved a variance request to Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, Section 11.5(c) to permit an accessory building toencroach within the south yard setback. This building was completed in Aprilof 2010.
-On July 30, 2009, the ZBA approved an application for a Special ExceptionUse Permit per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12(1) for a family quarters. Thefamily quarters were combined with the above referenced accessory building.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Board may grant a variance from the literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance:
a.Where the spirit of the ordinance is observed and substantial justice isdone;b.Where the Board finds that granting the variance will not be contrary tothe public interest, and;
c.Where, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of theprovisions of this ordinance would result in “unnecessary hardship.”
A hardship is considered “unnecessary” where the applicant demonstrates:
1.That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to
the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable toother lands, structures or buildings in the same district;2.That the literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance
deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other propertiesin the same district;3.That the special conditions and circumstances that exist are not the
result of the actions of the applicant;4.That the granting of this variance does not confer on the applicant any
Case No. Attachment A
ZBA22-0001 Page 2
special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district;
5.That the reasons stated in the application justify granting the varianceand that the variance will be the minimum necessary to make possiblethe reasonable use of the land, building or structure, and
6.That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the generalpurpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and will not be injurious tothe neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Case No. Attachment B
ZBA22-0001 Page 1
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 2
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 3
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 4
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 5
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 6
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 7
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 8
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 9
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 10
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 11
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 12
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 13
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 14
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 15
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 16
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 17
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 18
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 19
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 20
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 21
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 22
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 23
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 24
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 25
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 26
Case No. ZBA22-0001 Attachment C Page 27
2
Good Neighbor policy (posts fully covered) ‐ View from Glen Wood's house.
3
View of the fence from Wilkes house (posts fully covered).
4
1
Reagan Rothenberger
From:Tim Wiford <>
Sent:Thursday, April 7, 2022 4:26 PM
To:Reagan Rothenberger
Subject:Fence 2 - 615 Brewer Road - 2 of 3
Reagan, Thank you for your help ‐‐ Page 3.
View of Dinsmore fence from my back porch.
2
View of my neighbor Michael Wilkes first floor window from my back porch.
3
Sent from my I‐phone
1
Reagan Rothenberger
From:Tim Wiford <>
Sent:Thursday, April 7, 2022 4:27 PM
To:Reagan Rothenberger
Subject:Fence 3 - 615 Brewer Road
Reagan, Thank you for your help. Page 3. Tim
Tim Wiford Director 403 Canyon Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501 505-982-2403 | Direct: 214-771-5160 www.wifordgallery.com
Space between property line of Wilkes and my fence ranges from 15’9” to 25’. The easement in view ranges from 40’‐
50’ across according to the survey.
2
My fence is consistently 15 feet off the road, so no issues with oncoming traffic.
3
Sent from my I‐phone
Case No. Attachment D
ZBA22-0001 Page 1
SURVEY