Loading...
Item 6 - Land Use Plan Amendment Exhibits1 Overview: the property at 1100 Raven Bend Court (1100 RBC) is a 1986 ranch style house with 4 beds and 3 baths 2 Overview: we are very early in the process to re-plat our property at 1100 Raven Bend Court from 1 acre to 2 x ~0.5 acre properties 1100 Raven Bend Court replat process and status SPIN Land Use Plan, DRC Land Use Plan, P&Z Topographic surveys and concept plan Zoning, DRC Zoning P&Z Land Use and Zoning, City Council #1 Land Use and Zoning, City Council #2 Re-plat, DRC Re-plat, P&Z Re-plat, City Council #1 Re-plat, City Council #2 We are here! 3 Overview:Raven Bend Court is located at the hard right turn on North Peytonville, between the Sr. High and Dove road Raven Bend location Raven Bend neighborhood 4 Overview:for scale…1100 RBC is roughly the size and shape of a football field –40 yards deep and 120 yards wide. N 5 Section1-1: Completed Table 1: Future Land Use Map Amendment and Table 2: Land Use Mix (if applicable). 6 Section 1-1 (con’t): Completed Table 1: Future Land Use Map Amendment and Table 2: Land Use Mix (if applicable). 7 Section 1-2: Map that clearly indicates the boundary of the proposed change and includes the land use designation of all surrounding properties Boundary of proposed change Low density (Cross Timbers, SF1A) Medium Density (South Ridge Lakes, SF20) Medium Density (Shady Oaks, SF20)Medium Density (Shady Oaks, RPUD) Low density (Raven Bend, SF1A) 8 Section 1-3: A letter that includes subsections a-g Please reference the letter included as part of the submittal package, titled “03-2022.07.20-LUP Letter, Section 1-3_v3-DRAFT” 9 Appendix of figures 10 Figure 1 from section 1-3(b) Erosion and flooding from Shady Oaks development 11 Figure 2 from section 1-3(b) Flooding from Shady Oaks development 12 Figure 3 from section 1-3(c): the current state of 1100 RBC is costing Southlake $100K+ over the next 10 years, instead of generating $700K+ Re-plat business case Current state Current storm drainage solution Coordinated storm drainage solution Coordinated storm drainage solution + re-plat TAD value assessment $435,0001 $840,2232 $3,768,4783 Approx. revenue to Southlake over the next 10 years4 1.Based on 2021 value as won in previous protest2.Proposed TAD assessment for 20223.Proposed TAD assessment for 2022 for bordering properties in Shady Oaks, representing 1 and 2 improved homes (respectively) on the existing 1100 RBC site4.Assumes 2% of assessed price goes to the City of Southlake and Carroll ISD and average annual basis increase of 4.5% $87K $206K $926K -$119K +$720K 10 year tax revenue to Southlake 13 Figure 4 from section 1-3(d): A re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet more spacing than the current Raven Bend corner-to-corner home density Concern #1 –neighborhood density (units = feet) 150 82 43 83 5433 113 115 55 43 99 87 RBC (ex-1100 RBC) 150 82 43 83 54 33 113 115 55 43 99 79 1100 RBC re- plat 87 14 Figure 5 from section 1-3(d): :Raven Bend is largely surrounded by medium-density (or more dense) land use neighborhoods Concern #3 –adjacent neighborhood density Key takeaways ▪Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 sides by medium-density or more- dense land use (e.g. RPUD in Shady Oaks) ▪Cross Timbers is low density; however, it only borders ~100 feet of Raven Bend and is separated by Peytonville (a large-collector throughway) Raven Bend Shady Oaks (medium) Southridge Lakes (medium) Shady Oaks (RPUD) Cross Timbers (low) 15 Appendix 16 The Kearneys have been trying to make capital improvements to their property and Raven Bend (to the benefit of all neighbors) since 2015 Kearney proposed property improvements Re-plat to breakup property into 2 x ~0.5 acre properties 1 Renovation of the original house 2 Backyard improvements 3 Sewer connection for both propertiesSewer connection for both properties 4 Sidewalks on all sides of properties 5 Monument and entry way improvements 6 17 Unfortunately, massive erosion and flooding from a developer caused the Kearneys to spend 7 years in litigation… Issues with developer Property line Initial erosion, filling in east-west swale 12”+ of sediment in east-west swale River of water from detention pond and under wall 18 The Kearney’s spent 7 years in litigation with the developer and won a near-unanimous verdict on the 2 main charges1 Developer litigation outcome (Tarrant County Cause No. 096-293017-17)1 Code/ ordinances Jury charge Verdict 1.Texas Water Code 11.086 2.Southlake Code of Ordinances, Sec. 9.5-65(g) Did the Shady Oaks Defendants divert or impound the natural flow of surface water or permit a diversion or impounding to continue in a manner that damaged Plaintiff’s property? Yes Was the diversion or impoundment, or permitting the diversion of impoundment to continue, intentional? Yes Texas Water Code 11.086 No person may divert or impound the natural flow of surface waters in this state, or permit a diversion or impounding by him to continue, in a manner that damages the property of another by the overflow of the water diverted or impounded. Southlake Code of Ordinances, Sec. 9.5-65(g) Diversion or impoundment: All drainage systems shall be designed to prevent the diversion or impoundment of the natural flow of surface water in a manner that damages the property of another by the flow of the water diverted or impounded. The director of public works shall place in each developer's agreement a provision requiring the developer to comply with all applicable laws, including, but not limited to, section 1(1)086, Texas Water Code. In addition, the director of public works shall place on each plat that receives final approval, a statement that reads as follows: Compliance with the provisions of the city's storm drainage policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, section 1(1)086, Texas Water Code. 1.Since the Kearneys received a verdict in their favor in February-2022, the Kearneys have settled with the defendant Point 1: a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to offset inflation of construction materials since lawsuit bids were created. 19 The City is in-work on a capital project that can partially alleviate issues on the Kearney property (once in-work modifications) Southlake capital project overview Point 2: a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to tie the engineered solution into the City capital project. 20 Proceeds from the re-platted Kearney property will be re-invested in 5 initiatives Re-plat re-investment plan 1.Offset the increase in construction costs (inflation of materials and labor) associated with remediation of flooding 2.Tie #1 into City of Southlake Capital project 3.Sidewalks on all public-facing sides of the new and existing property 4.Upgrade communal Raven Bend Court entry way and monument 5.Potential to invest in other jointly-derived communal Raven Bend Court upgrades (e.g. street signs, street lighting, etc.) 3 4 Safety concern due to proximity of pedestrians and traffic 21 We have sought concerns from our neighbors –what other concerns do you have/ see? Concern Concern detail Explanation 1.Neighborhood density The current Raven Bend neighborhood is zone low-density and by re-platting 1100 RBC, is would create discontinuity in neighborhood appearance The re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet more corner-to-corner separation than the current neighborhood (ex-1100 RBC) 2.Neighborhood covenants Do covenants allow for re-platting? Yes, and any re-platting attempts would follow the democratic process outlined in the covenants 3.Adjacent neighborhood density Allowing a move from low-density to medium-density will create a mismatch with adjacent neighborhoods Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 sides by medium-density or more-dense land use (e.g. RPUD in Shady Oaks) 4.Sidewalks Southlake residents love sidewalks! Absolutely planning for sidewalks on all public-facing sides of the re-platted properties (per re-plat requirements) 5.Home design The new home will not match the current homes in Raven Bend Court We will design the new house (and update our current house) using a colonial or ranch style façade 6.Tree conservation Developing a new lot would require removal of trees We plan to repurpose ~25% of the trees as lumber in the construction of our home. We have planted more than 20 trees (nellie stevens) on the re-platted land to date and have a plan to plant 50+ more trees. 7.?? 22 Southlake Capital Improvement Project (CIP) analysis 23 Inlet 1 is responsible for ~200K sq. ft. (or 4.74 acres) 24 Inlet 2 is responsible for ~25K sq. ft. (or 0.57 acres) 25 Inlet #1: 4.74 acres (206,608 sq. ft.) Inlet #2: 0.57 acres (25,184 sq. ft.) Inlet #2 is the same size as inlet #1, when it is responsible for 10-15% the volume of water