Item 14 - Staff ReportCase No.
ZA22-0033
S T A F F R E P O R T
July 29, 2022
CASE NO: ZA22-0033
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Carillon Parc EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Kimley- Horn, on behalf of Carillon Parc Development Partners, is requesting
approval of a Preliminary Plat for Carillon Parc on property described as Tracts 1,
1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H.
Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and
located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln., 201 E.
Kirkwood Blvd., 1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N. Carroll Ave. by
Tarrant Appraisal District) and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 114, generally
located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera
Ln., and north of E. State Hwy. 114. Current Zoning: “ECZ” Employment Center
Zoning District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.
DETAILS: The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Preliminary Plat, consistent with
the approved Zoning and Development Plan for Carillon Parc, being approximately
42.51 acres and containing lots for a mixed use development of single family
detached residential, retail, restaurant, office, hotel, residential lofts, library,
performing arts and parks/open space within the Carillon Development.
STAFF COMMENTS: Park Dedication
The park dedication shown on the preliminary plat does not comply with the
approved City Council motion and approved zoning documents. The City
Council motion indicated that approximately 8 to 9 acres of parkland will be
dedicated as represented on the development plan. The development plan
(page 17) shows +/- 9 acres of park dedication as well as the geographic
location of the dedication. The proposed preliminary plat indicates only 7.993
acres of park dedication (Blocks H1, H2 and H3) and is not consistent with the
geographical area shown in the approved zoning document (p. 17). The
preliminary plat omits the area shown as Lot 7, Block F on the plat as a
dedicated lot. According to the zoning, the amount of parkland dedicated can
only be modified by a City Council action as part of the approval of the
developer’s or 380 agreement or final location of the
library/multiuse/performance arts building. To date, neither of these conditions
have occurred. It is staff’s understanding that the developer will be presenting
a revised preliminary plat to the Planning and Zoning on Thursday evening
addressing staff’s comment regarding the park dedication amount and location.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA22-0033
Approved Zoning Booklet – page 17 Park Dedication (entire zoning booklet provided in your electronic packet).
Proposed preliminary plat – proposed park dedication area shown in green.
Case No.
ZA22-0033
Right of Way Dedication and Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
In the plat review summary, staff has provided a number of comments related to
ensuring that adequate right of way is provided to accommodate drive turn and
deceleration lanes per the TIA presented as part of the entitlement process. As the PZ
Commission may recall the initial TIA was based on site being developed entirely as a
commercial mixed use development (hotel, office, restaurant, library, retail, etc.) with
exception of the residential lofts. The final Carillon Parc zoning and development plan
approved replaced the commercial development on the north part of the site with 79
Villa product units. The developer is in the process of revising theTIA to reflect the
residential component, which will likely reduce trip volumes to sites. Drive deceleration
and turn lane requirements will be based on the revised TIA following the City
Engineer’s approval as noted in the review. The developer is in the process of
preparing a new TIA for review.
Proposed Drive Ally Access
Finally, the developer will be presenting three options to extend the alley in block E to
Rivera Drive to improve circulation for traffic and trash trucks. Below are three options
that the applicant has submitted for consideration. The alley configuration is not
consistent with the development plan but can be approved by City Council, following a
Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. The applicant’s preference is the
red alignment option identified as option #2.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Preliminary Plat Approval
Case No.
ZA22-0033
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 29, 2022.
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Presentation
Comprehensive Plan Review
TIA
TIA Review
SPIN Meeting Report
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Construction Plans
Alley Configuration Poropsal
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0033 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carillon Parc Development Partners
APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood
Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and
3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District
HISTORY: May 20, 1997; City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan to
“NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development.
December 18, 2001; City Council approved a zoning change and concept
plan requiring a 300 ft. setback on N. Carroll Avenue, subject to City
Council discretion. The purpose of the zoning change and concept plan
was to incorporate newly acquired tracts of land into the existing “NR-
PUD”, revise parcel boundaries and permitted uses within the district.
On November 18, 2008 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Development Plan from ‘NR-PUD’ Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development and ‘C-2’ Local Retail Commercial District to ‘ECZ’
Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case ZA08-
031 (Ordinance No. 480-564).
September 4, 2012; City Council approved the request to amend
miscellaneous development regulations in the Carillon Zoning Booklet
under Planning Case ZA12-066 (Ordinance No. 480-564a).
November 6, 2014; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest,
LP requested at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on November
6, 2014 to table indefinitely two applications: a Site Plan application for
One Carillon Court (ZA18-085) and a Zoning Change and Development
Plan application for the Carillon Corporate District (ZA14-102).
April 21, 2015; City Council voted to deny a 1st Reading request for a
Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon under Planning Case
ZA15-002 (Ordinance No. 564b). The purpose of this request was to
amend the current Carillon Zoning Book to add a roofing material permitted
in the EC Neighborhood - Chateaux District. The proposal intended to add
language that would have allowed metal as a permitted roof material to
Chateaux District.
April 18, 2017; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest, LP
requested to withdrawal the following Planning Cases at the April 18, 2017
City Council meeting:
• ZA16-029 (Ordinance. No. 480-564B) – Zoning Change and
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0033 Page 2
Development Plan for Carillon Corporate District
• ZA16-030 – Site Plan for Hotel Indigo Carillon
• ZA16-031 – Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Carillon –
Hotel Indigo
• Also at the April 18, 2017 City Council meeting, The City of
Southlake withdrew Planning Case ZA17-071 (Ordinance No. 480-
564C), which was a proposed Zoning Change and Development
Plan for Carillon Plaza District.
The following Planning Cases related to the Carillon Plaza District were
withdrawn by staff due to inactivity; the applicant did not ever make a
formal submittal:
• ZA16-081 – Site Plan for Carillon Salons of Volterra
• ZA16-082 – Site Plan for Carillon Wellness Center and Spa
• ZA16-083 – Preliminary Plat for the Carillon Plaza District
On June 19, 2018, the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Development Plan (ZA18-0006) for the Plaza District portion
(approximately 42.51 acres) of the Carillon Development for the purposes
of amending the existing district regulations and approved development
plan for this portion of Carillon.
December 7, 2021; the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Development Plan subject to Staff Report dated November 30, 2021, and
Development Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated November 30, 2021, and
granting the following:
- Per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, the minimum stacking depth
from the SH114 & N. White Chapel Blvd. is 150’. Approving a
variance which permits approximately 40 feet and 110 feet of
stacking depth respectively.
In terms of the concept plan/zoning booklet:
- Approving the Option B concept plan which was presented this
evening and indicates the following:
- Allowing up to 79 type “A” villa lots and 50 residential lofts and
noting that the type “A” villas will adhere to all residential standards
as outlined in the 2008 Carillon zoning approval (ZA 480-564). Also
noting that the residential lofts will be a minimum of 2,300 square
feet and are limited to building B as shown on the development
plan (identified as the orange building on the colored development
plan). Also noting that the type “A” villas and residential lofts must
be constructed to meet all fire regulations, including the installation
of fire suppression systems, if required.
- Designating an area located in the southeast portion of Carillon
Parc-Plaza District (shaded in pink on the development plan) for a
possible location of a City library--if it is determined by the City that
such a facility should be located within this development. Also
noting that this alternate area (pink shaded area) can include in
addition to a public library the following uses: retail; restaurant,
office, hotel, chapel, performing arts, and multiple purpose uses.
- Allowing a hotel as a permitted use in the general area where
buildings H, I, and K are identified on the development plan.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0033 Page 3
- Allowing subgrade/at grade parking beneath the park area, if
required.
- Noting that all non-residential buildings require site plan approval
from City Council following a Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendation and that the proposed site plans will be evaluated
per the requirements of the zoning approval in terms of use,
architectural style, parking, and other requirements of the zoning
document. Also noting that emergency access will also be
evaluated at the site plan phase.
- Accepting all proposed changes noted in the zoning booklet and
summarized by the applicant as attachment E of the staff report.
Also noting that the use table will include beer pubs and craft
breweries as defined in the Zoning Ordinance 480 as permitted
uses.
In terms of the construction phasing plan, White Chapel Blvd.
and construction traffic:
- Approving the phasing plan presented and noting that the
developer must construct the Phase I site infrastructure
(roadway and utilities) as purple on the phasing plan) and have
the Phase I infrastructure inspected and approved prior to the
release by the City of the 79 Villa Type A lots for home
construction.
- Screen wall will be constructed in a similar manner to example
photos in the zoning booklet.
- Noting that no certificate of occupancy will be issued for any
commercial/office/mixed use (i.e. nonresidential) buildings until
the Phase 1A park construction is completed per the executed
developer’s or 380 agreement and has been inspected and is
accepted by the City. - The park dedication will be approximately
8 to 9 acres as represented on the development plan unless
determined otherwise by a City Council action as part of the
approval of the developer’s or 380 agreement or final location of
the library/multiuse/performance arts building.
- At a minimum, the park component will include the following
elements (unless determined otherwise in the developer’s or
380 agreement):
- Operating and maintained fountain as represented in the zoning
booklet.
- (2) Carillon bell towers (the primary and secondary tower) similar
to the scale and size as represented in the zoning booklet.
- Plaza area similar in size and character as represented in the
zoning booklet.
- Pathways and sidewalks as represented in the zoning booklet.
- If the City Council determines that the park dedication is less
than what is represented on the development plan
(approximately 8- 9 acres), the area of land not dedicated will
become private space maintained by the property management
company or other private entity.
- The White Chapel Blvd. widening from SH 114 to East Kirkwood
Blvd. will be constructed and accepted by the City prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0033 Page 4
commercial/office/mixed use (i.e. nonresidential) buildings. This
section of White Chapel Blvd. shall be designed and constructed
in a manner consistent with the City’s mobility plan and include
medians, sidewalks, and any required streetlights.
- All construction related traffic for the non-residential portion of
the development will enter the site from SH 114 or White Chapel
Blvd.
In terms of park dedication and fountain performance:
- Final park dedication, maintenance responsibilities and
performance thresholds will be determined as part of the
developer’s agreement and or 380 agreement.
- The City and the applicant have agreed on the date of June 30,
2022 for the City to take time to assess future library locations,
and to determine if the Carillon location is the appropriate
location for a future library. Staff will work with the developer
with acceptable criteria for a potential library to be considered
for Carillon during the time between now and June 30, 2022.
- Dedication of the park land is at a time to be determined upon
an agreement of an economic development incentive
agreement.
- No building permits, for any lots, in the development, either
commercial or residential, will be issued until a successful
executed economic development incentive agreement.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Review has been prepared for this
development. (Attached separately)
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the previous Carillon Parc
submittal in 2018. Please see the TIA and Consultant’s Review of TIA
attached separately.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on September 28, 2021.
Please see the meeting report attached separately.
A Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on
August 23, 2021. Please see the meeting report attached separately.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 29, 2022.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA20-0029 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA22-0033 Review No.: One Date of Review: 7/29/22
Project Name: Preliminary Plat – Carillon Parc
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Kimley-Horn Carillon Parc Development Partners
John Terrell
161 Summit Ave., Suite 200, Southlake, Texas
Phone: (817) 253-8355
Email: JTerrell@HCDevelopmentPartners.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/21/22 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
Planning Comments:
1. A Preliminary Plat shall substantially conform to the approved Concept (Development) Plan and all
lots shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance and underlying district regulations per Ord. 480-564e
(Ord. 483, Section 3.02.C & 8.01.J). The following do not appear to comply:
Label designated lot(s) (park dedication lots) located within in the southeast portion of Carillon
Parc-Plaza (shaded pink on page 10 of the Carillon Parc Zoning Booklet) for a future location
of a City library and possible multiuse/performance arts building(s). Provide a note on the
preliminary plat that both vehicular and pedestrian public access will be provided to these
future facilities.
a. Park dedication shown on the preliminary plat does not comply with the approved City
Council motion and approved zoning documents. The Council motion indicated that
approximately 8 to 9 acres of parkland will be dedicated as represented on the development
plan. The development plan (page 17) shows +/- 9 acres of park dedication as well as the
geographic location of the dedication. The proposed preliminary plat indicates only 7.993
acres of park dedication and omits the area currently shown as Lot 7, Block F on the plat as a
dedicated lot. According to the zoning, the amount of parkland dedicated can only be modified
by a City Council action as part of the approval of the developer’s or 380 agreement or final
location of the library/multiuse/performance arts building. To date, neither of these conditions
have occurred.
b. Provide an open space maintenance plan per Zoning Ord. 480, Sect 33.20. Provide notes
on plat regarding what entity the private or public open space shall be dedicated to and the
entity responsible for maintenance.
c. Provide right-of-way dedication for the White Chapel Blvd. widening from SH 114 to East
Kirkwood Blvd. per the zoning approval. This includes accommodating for required turn lanes,
decel lanes, required parkway and sidewalks. Sidewalks can be provided on private property
only if a pedestrian access easement is provided and accepted by the City. White Chapel
Blvd must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for any commercial/office/mixed use (i.e. nonresidential) buildings. This section of
White Chapel Blvd. shall be designed and constructed in a manner consistent with the City’s
mobility plan and include medians, sidewalks, and any required streetlights. This must include
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 2
all turn/deceleration lanes or driveway configurations recommended in the TIA unless an
updated TIA is prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and approved.
d. Provide adequate right of way dedication for a right-turn lane on E. Kirkwood at Street ‘A’
unless an updated TIA is prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and the elimination of
the righthand turn lane is approved.
e. Provide adequate right of way for a westbound SH 114 right-turn deceleration lane unless
an updated TIA is prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and the elimination of the
deceleration lane is approved.
2. The following changes are needed with regard to streets & easements (Ord. 483, Sect. 3.07 &
5.02 & 5.03:
a. Alley located in Lot 6X requires an appropriate turn-around for emergency, trash collection
and general vehicular access. Provide an easement or extend the common area/alley lot to
the south.
b. Provide a common area lot for the Street ‘A’ round-about area, place note on the prelimary
plat that this lot is to be maintained by the owner’s association.
c. Right-of-way and easement dedication must be provided in accordance with construction
plans approved and as part of the developer’s agreement.
d. Ensure that all lots are provided full vehicular and pedestrian access either by ROW/street
or easement. For trails/sidewalks required, a pedestrian access easement is required if not in
a public right-of-way.
3. The following changes are needed per Ord, No. 483, Sect. 3.02:
a. Place the Case No. ZA22-0033 in the lower righthand corner of each sheet.
b. Show all easements on or adjacent to the site.
c. Although general utility easements are required in accordance with Section 3.02.D.22, staff
recommends easement be provided only as needed to ensure adequate extension of utilities
to adjoining properties and to the lots within the subdivision. Provide a minimum 10’ UE along
SH 114, designate all alleys as a private access, drainage and utility easement.
d. Provide a land use summary chart, similar to below, to include total number of residential,
non-residential lots, residential/neighborhood open space/common lots/area, non-residential
common area/open space lots/area, alley lots, public park dedication lots/area, non-
residential, etc.
Land Use Summary
Phase Existing
Land
Use
Existing
Zoning
Number
of Units
Gross
Acreage
Net
Acreage
Density-DU
/Gross
Acreage
Open
Space
Area / %
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 3
e. In the title block please verify/correct the number residential lots (appears to be 78). Note
the number of public park lots, nonresidential lots, non-res. association lots (if any).
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Provide the existing tree cover preservation calculations on the Tree Conservation Plan. The
proposed existing tree cover preservation must conform to the approved Tree Conservation Plan
that was approved as part of the zoning and development plan approval.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding
development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan
or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 4
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
2. There are existing trees in the Block H chapel area, the Block F open space areas, and the Block
G open space areas that are shown to be preserved but are located within hardscape areas.
These trees should possibly be designated as “Marginal” potential tree to remain.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The full right-of-way section shall be maintained at the turn lane along White Chapel.
2. An access easement for access from all lots to the public right-of-way for Lots 1 and 2 of Block F
and for Lots 5, 6, 7 & 8 of Block F may be required.
3. The public water and sewer lines shall be located within right-of-way or a dedicated easement.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS
* The inlet at the intersection of Street F and Riviera Dr. shall be relocated.
UTILITY PLAN
* Verify that the proposed SSMH at the intersection of Riviera and Kirkwood does not conflict with
the sidewalk.
*=Denotes informational comment that don’t need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 5
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the
riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall
be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the
riser. (Label riser room locations to determine termination point of riser piping, and indicate size of the
riser rooms)
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and
within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC locations not indicated on the plans) Add
FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection to meet the distance requirements or add fire hydrants as
required. (Also, the FDC buildings must be within 50 feet of fire lane access)
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of
buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for un-sprinklered buildings. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-
weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (If the chapel is un-sprinkled, fire lanes will need to be
adjusted to meet the requirements. If the chapel is sprinklered, the “hose lay” distance increases to 250
feet and the current fire lanes are acceptable)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely
sprinkled buildings. Distance between hydrants along fire lane between Block F and Block C is in excess
of 700 feet. (Add a fire hydrant to meet the distance requirements)
General Informational Comments
* This plat is subject to all permitted uses and development regulations of Ord. No. 564d.
* The residential Villas will be served by a private alley – the developer / applicant should
contact Republic Waste Services to determine the needs for garbage / recycling access. The
number for customer service is (817) 317-2424.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay
Zone and will require execution of the Avigation Easement and Release referenced in the
Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, on subsequent Final Plats and will require
construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Final Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, an approved fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park
Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Plats are only accepted for processing in accordance with the Plat Submittal Schedule -
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0033 Page 6
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/302/Applications-Fees-Submittal-Schedules , and only after
appropriate zoning approvals for the proposed subdivision.
* All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0033 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Carillon Parc – Plaza District
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1975 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.18 NR
2. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62 NR
3. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.63 NR
4. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1965 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.86 NR
5. LEE, CHARLES ECZ 100 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.39 NR
6. DAVENPORT, DANIEL F ECZ 104 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
7. MCGOWEN, MILTON ECZ 105 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 NR
8. GOLLA, HEMANTHA ECZ 101 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 NR
9. SATANI, DHAVAL D ECZ 209 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
10. WALKER, ANDREW T ECZ 213 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
11. MARINELLI, RODNEY ECZ 301 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
12. CRANE, MARY E ECZ 305 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
13. HUSAIN, ASIF ECZ 1801 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR
14. ATWOOD, TODD ECZ 1845 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR
15. LARDIS, KRISTOPHER ECZ 1841 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
16. KHALIL, ISHAQUE K ECZ 1837 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
17. GUTHRIE, JACQUELINE ECZ 1833 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
18. PATTERSON, BRIAN ECZ 1829 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0033 Page 2
19. BRYCE, DANIEL L ECZ 1825 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
20. LEE, ERVING ECZ 1821 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
21. FRANDSEN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 1817 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
22. BENOIT, ROBERT ECZ 1813 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
23. FLURY, JANE ECZ 1809 RIVIERA LN 0.13 NR
24. CLARK, JAMES C ECZ 1805 RIVIERA LN 0.13 NR
25. MICHELSEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST, ECZ 1800 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 NR
26. MANDARA, FRANCESCO ECZ 1804 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 NRF
27. SHAW, DEREK DURAND ECZ 1808 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR
28. ALFORD, CARL S ECZ 1812 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR
29. JACK, HAYDEN ECZ 1816 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR
30. PARK, JEFFREY ECZ 1820 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.26 NR
31. ORF, TONY ECZ 405 MONTE CARLO DR 0.18 NR
32. EAMSHERANGKOON, KRIDDANAT ECZ 401 MONTE CARLO DR 0.19 NR
33. MILLER, JAMES ECZ 1713 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
34. ELVING, CARL ECZ 1709 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
35. CLARK, ROBERT K ECZ 1701 RIVIERA LN 0.17 NR
36. MISRA, NILAMBEN R ECZ 1705 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
37. ORTIZ, LOUIS M ECZ 400 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.15 NR
38. MOCHULSKY, RICHARD ECZ 402 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
39. LASSITER, TODD ECZ 404 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
40. DEVINENI, NAGA ECZ 403 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
41. WEBB, GREG ECZ 405 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
42. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1750 LE MANS LN 0.48 NR
43. BURCH, MIKE J ECZ 1633 RIVIERA LN 0.16 NR
44. COUCH JOHN AND PEGGY
REVOCABLE ECZ 1629 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
45. DUNCAN, BRIAN ECZ 1625 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
46. BIEKER, RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
47. MCCAW, NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
48. RUCCI, COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
49. BATOOL, FATIMA ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
50. DANCE, DAVID ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.21 NR
51. SMITH, MICHAEL ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
52. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 400 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.91 NR
53. VISSERS EMILY A REVOCABLE FAMI ECZ 310 MONTPELIER DR 0.17 NR
54. PERRY, RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR
55. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 8.01 NR
56. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 300 E SH 114 3.94 NR
57. MARCIANO, PAUL ECZ 1717 RIVIERA LN 0.15 NR
58. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1840 RIVIERA LN 2.33 NR
59. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 201 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 1.69 NR
60. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ
1801 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 10.50 NR
61. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ
1781 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 3.07 NR
62. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ
1775 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 0.32 NR
63. BROWN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 300 ORLEANS DR 0.48 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0033 Page 3
64. MEISNER, JEFFREY ECZ 401 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.16 NR
65. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1650 LE MANS LN 0.36 NR
66. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15 NR
67. MCKELLAR TRUST ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24 NR
68. LANIER LIVING TRUST (STARK
CURRENT OWNER) ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 NR
69. SHARON R. BELL LIVING TRUST ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR
70. ILINENI, VISHNU ECZ 400 MONTPELIER DR 0.36 NR
71. CARILLON PARC CORPORATE DISTRI ECZ 360 E SH 114 9.02 NR
72. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 350 ORLEANS DR 0.83 NR
73. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 401 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.67 NR
74. WATERS, TIMOTHY ECZ 301 MONTPELIER DR 0.19 NR
75. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 100 E SH 114 4.60 NR
76. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.29 NR
77. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.05 NR
78. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.76 NR
79. ZVONECEK, BRIAN SP1
1700 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.51 NR
80. SHIVERS, FRANCES BIRD EST AG
1800 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.20 NR
81. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD C2 140 W SH 114 0.85 NR
82. SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG
1900 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 39.08 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent within 300’: Seventy-four (68)
Responses Received within 300’:
Responses Received outside 300’
Responses Received with No Address