Item 7B - Staff Memo9
CASE NO: ZA22-0037
SOUTHLAKE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
September 13, 2022
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Malik Estates
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Parvez and Seema Malik are requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan on property described as Lot 1A, Malik Estates Addition, and Tracts
1A01A2B and 1A01A2C, Ben J. Foster Survey Abstract 519, located at 905-925
Randol Mill Ave., Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. Current Zoning "SF-1A"
Single Family Residential District. Proposed Zoning: "SF-1A" and "SF-30" Single
Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #5
DETAILS: The property is located approximately 600 feet south of the intersection of
Wildwood Way and Randol Mill Ave.
The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a zoning change to "SF-30"
Single Family Residential District for a 0.70 acre portion of property and concept
plan for the entire 3.77 acre property for three single family residences, two abiding
by "SF-1A" zoning, and one by "SF-30" zoning. The net density of the plan is 0.8
DU/Ac.
The applicant is requesting a variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as
amended, Section 8.01.E, that requires that the rear lot line of all lots abutting
property land use designated, zoned or platted for lots 1 acre or larger be a
minimum of 125 feet in length. Lot 2 as proposed would not meet this standard.
The applicant shows the rear lot line to be approximately 101 feet, which would in
turn only meet base SF-30 zoning standards.
Site Data
Existing Zoning
Summary
SF-1A
Proposed Zoning
Two Lots: SF-1A, One Lot: SF-30
Land Use Designation
Low Density Residential
Gross/ Acreage
3.77 acres
Residential Lots
3
Gross/Net Density
0.8 DU/A
Lot Area Range
30,380 — 86,850 sq.ft.
Average Lot Area
54,795 sq. ft / 1.26 acres
VARIANCE
REQUEST: Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.E, requires that the
rear lot line of all lots abutting property residentially zoned or platted for lots 1 acre
or larger be a minimum of 125 feet in width. The rear lot line of Lot 2 abuts two
platted residentially zoned (RPUD) lots greater than 1 are in area, one being
common area/open space lot and a portion of residential lot in Palomar Estates.
The width of Lot 2 is 101 feet.
Case No.
ZA22-0037
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider Approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-789
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
PowerPoint Presentation
Plans
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Reagan Rothenberger (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA22-0037
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Parvez & Seema Malik
PROPERTY SITUATION: 905-925 Randol Mill Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1A, Malik Estates Addition, and Tracts 1A01A2B and 1A01A2C, Ben J.
Foster Survey Abstract 519
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District
PROPOSED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District, "SF-30" Single Family
Residential District
HISTORY: The subject property was annexed into the city on October 20, 1987 with
Ordinance No. 384. The property was zoned "AG" Agricultural District upon
annexation.
The "SF-1X Low Density Residential District zoning designation was
approved with the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480-302, case
ZA98-157, on March 2, 1999.
A Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 & 2 of Malik Estates Addition was approved
February 4, 1999 with case ZA98-158.
A Final Plat for Lot 1 of the Malik Estates Addition was approved March 8,
2000 with case ZA00-01.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is
"Low Density Residential".
The purpose of the Low Density Residential land
use category is to provide for and to protect low
intensity detached single-family residential
development that promotes the openness and rural
character of Southlake.
FM
Definition: The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-
family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling
units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre,
which excludes acreage in all rights -of -way, easement, and lots designated
for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those permitted in
the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories. The Low
Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character
of the City of Southlake.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Randol Mill Ave. to be a
Case No. Attachment A
ZA22-0037 Page 1
6-lane 130-140 foot divided arterial roadway.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
An existing 8' multi -use trail exists along the property in conformance with
the Pathways Master Plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938) is currently constructed as an approximately
135' wide roadway with six lanes along the subject property.
The existing residence will continue utilizing the existing driveway
connecting to Randol Mill Ave. The two proposed lots will use an existing
curb cut as a common access driveway for both lots. No new curb cuts are
proposed.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development.
Roadway Easement on Subject Property
A roadway easement exists on the southern portion of the subject property
as a remainder of a former unimproved roadway known as Gifford Court.
Much of this former easement has been abandoned as Gifford Court
redeveloped as Palomar Estates. Incidentally, a private driveway named
Dream Maker Court is located on the adjacent property to the south and is
not a part of this roadway easement. The applicant does not propose any
form of access to this Dream Maker Ct. private driveway.
TREE PRESERVATION/
LANDSCAPE: The proposed tree preservation on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan
would comply with the Exiting Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of
the Tree Preservation ordinance. Only one (1) protected tree is proposed
to possibly be removed for the construction of a home.
UTILITIES: There is an existing 12" water line along Randol Mill Ave. Currently, there
is no sewer main serving the property directly. An 8" sewer main exists just
south of the property along Randol Mill Ave. The applicant will be required
to connect sewer to the site as it lies within 100' of the property.
DRAINAGE: A drainage survey will be conducted and provided prior to platting of the
property.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN or Corridor Planning Committee meeting has not been scheduled
for this property.
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: Approved (5-0); subject to Staff Report dated September 2, 2022, and Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022, and granting the rear
lot width variance as requested, and noting any future development and
platting must conform to the Concept Plan.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA22-0037 Page 2
Vicinity Map
905-925 Randol Mill Ave.
CO
L211��218
w
0
2G1212008
REAM M FCER 1 G 7
Go
CD
;IS
ZA22-0037
Zoning Change & Concept Plan
0 196 390 780
A � � Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA22-0037 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZCP22-0037 Review No.: Two
Project Name: Concept Plan — Malik Estates
APPLICANT:
Seema Malik
Parvez Malik
925 Randol Mill Ave. Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-845-2896
Email: seema(a)businesszoom.us
OWNER:
Seema Malik
Parvez Malik
Date of Review: 09/02/22
925 Randol Mill Ave. Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-845-2896
Email: seema(ftusinesszoom.us
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
08/12/22 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT REAGAN ROTHENBERGER AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Place the City case number "ZA22-0037" in the lower right corner for ease of reference.
2. Note location, type, and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices, whether existing or
proposed, if any. General comment: All fencing must comply with the requirements of Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, Section 39.5.c.4 (if any).
3. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.E, requires that the rear lot line of all
lots abutting property residentially zoned or platted for lots 1 acre or larger be a minimum of 125
feet in width. The rear lot line of Lot 2 abuts two platted residentially zoned (RPUD) lots greater
than 1 are in area, one being common area/open space lot and a portion of residential lot in
Palomar Estates. The width of Lot 2 is 101 feet. (Variance Requested)
4. Title Block of the Concept Plan should include the following:
a. City, County, State
b. Gross Acreage
C. Provide name of Owner
d. Notate existing and proposed zoning of the property.
5. Unplatted adjacent tracts should have owners name labeled, deed, TAD tract number &
Survey name/Abst #, as well as the Zoning, and Land Use designations. Show the adjoin lot
boundaries with lot, block, land use designation and zoning for Palomar Estates.
6. Provide a Vicinity Map that shows the general location in the city.
7. Confirm that the one-story frame structure bisected by Lots 2 & 3 is to be removed on the
Concept Plan.
8. Show and label the City Limit Line between Southlake and Keller
Informational Comments:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0037 Page 1
* For the purpose of this review, unless otherwise noted, the above comments pertain to the
Concept Plan provided by SSD Designs, Inc.
Reagan C. Rothenberger, MPA
Principal Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8602
rrothenberger@ci.southIake.tx.us
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
1. The proposed tree preservation on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan would comply with the
Exiting Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation ordinance. Only one (1)
protected tree is proposed to possibly be removed for the construction of a home.
2. A Type Q Bufferyard is required along FM 1938 frontage. Please reflect this on the Concept Plan.
With the submittal of any building plans a Tree Protection Permit will be required along with a Tree
Survey and Tree Protection Plan. The proposed preservation and removal of trees on the plans
shall conform to the Tree Conservation Plan approved with the Zoning and Concept Plans.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% — 20%
70%
20.1 — 40%
60%
40.1 % - 60%
50%
60.1 % - 80%
40%
80.1 % - 100%
30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights -of -way as approved by City Council.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0037 Page 2
1. A Utility plan will be required to be submitted with the plat submittal.
2. Please be aware that since the city sanitary sewer is located within 100-feet, connection to city
sewer will be required for the newly created lots. If sanitary sewer cannot be extended from the
south due to elevation constraints, then it shall be extended from the north to the southern
properties. This will require a utility easement.
a. The existing UE will need to be increased to a 10 UE.
*=Denotes informational comments that will need to be addressed on the first submittal of the Civil
Construction Plans.
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0037 Page 3
Fire Department Review
No comments based on submitted information.
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
General Informational Comments
No review of proposed signs is intended with this plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
The applicant should be aware that prior to any conveyance or issuance of a building permit, a
Plat that conforms to the underlying zoning of the site must be processed and filed in the County
Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must
be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited
to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and
related Permit Fees.
In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0037 Page 4
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
SPO #
Owner
Zoning
Physical Address
Acreage
Response
1
BAYLESS, ROBERT
RPUD
2109 PALOMAR TRL
0.721615642
2
HENDERSHOT, MICHAEL
RPUD
2113 PALOMAR TRL
0.242712041
3
985 RANDOL MILL LP
RPUD
2111 PALOMAR TRL
0.002710821
4
985 RANDOL MILL LP
RPUD
2117 PALOMAR TRL
0.324269594
5
TEXAS, STATE OF
RPUD
945 RANDOL MILL AVE
0.007415253
6
WINTERSTELLER, RICHARD J
RPUD
2101 PALOMAR TRL
0.203342647
7
THE EBBITT FAMILY TRUST
RPUD
2105 PALOMAR TRL
0.485948251
8
JAMESON, MATTHEW
RPUD
908 LOS ALTOS TRL
0.674195062
O
9
985 RANDOL MILL LP
RPUD
904 LOS ALTOS TRL
1.030576115
10
THIRUMALAI, KARTHIK
RPUD
900 LOS ALTOS TRL
0.900500543
O
11
CLARK, VALERIE JOYCE
AG
755 RANDOL MILL AVE
1.582202768
12
985 RANDOL MILL LP
RPUD
2097 PALOMAR TRL
0.023639863
13
THE TED AND JOLENE COLPO REVOC
RPUD
905 LOS ALTOS TRL
0.548142161
14
KAZZAZZ LIVING TRUST DATED OCT
RPUD
2105 PASO ROBLES TRL
0.752537352
15
RIORDAN, MICHAEL J
RPUD
2100 PALOMAR TRL
0.577874634
16
JAMIK PROPERTIES INC
RPUD
909 LOS ALTOS TRL
0.479067697
17
SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL ISD
18
CITY OF KELLER
1000
MALIK, PARVEZ
SF1-A
0.646024088
1001
MALIK, PARVEZ
SF1-A
905 RANDOL MILL AVE
0.579727146
1002
MALIK, PARVEZ
SF1-A
925 RANDOL MILL AVE
2.469115007
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Nineteen (19)
Responses Received within 200': In Favor: 0 Opposed: 2 Undecided: 0 No Response: 17
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0037 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS RESPONSES
We are opposing the re -zoning request (ZA22-0037) due to the
following reasons:
Safety considerations: We purchased our property knowing there is an
electric utility pole with transformers on the other side of our rear
property line. This pole is located on the property for which re -zoning
has been requested. Overhead power lines run from this pole through
the middle of this property (parallel to Gifford Court and towards
Randol Mill). Since this is a 3-phase line, it has a 15-feet utility
easement on both sides. We understood that building structures could
not be constructed on both sides of the electric lines because of this
easement. Any structure or backyard pool built under these lines pose
fire and safety hazards. Potential of downed lines during bad weather
increases this risk. We do not see this electric utility pole (located —60
feet North of Gifford Court), overhead power lines or utility easement
considerations shown in the proposed concept plan documents
submitted for rezoning.
Privacy considerations: Privacy in our backyard was an influencing
factor in purchase of our home. We had a reasonable expectation of
privacy, as we were not expecting a property to be built under power
lines, beyond our rear property line.
Home value considerations: Home values are likely to get negatively
affected, because of the above. In addition, large acreage split to cater
to multiple homes with no HOA runs the risk of construction that is
inconsistent with the neighborhood and community character of
adjoining Palomar Estates.
Our home value consideration concerns are shared with neighbor
conversations we've had as well.
Karthik Thirumalai and Jeanne Ma
9/8/2022
Case No. Attachment E
ZA22-0037 Page 1
From:
To:
McKenzie
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Planning & Zoning Case Input Form
Date: Thursday, September 8, 2022 6:29:55 PM
Planning & Zoning Case Input Form
Project Name Rezoning of Malik Estate
Planning & Zoning ZA22-0037
Case Number
Project Location 905-925 Randol Mill Ave
I am: Opposed
Comments 1 Please reference the feedback from Karthik Thirumalai
Explanation
(�Deuuuii uiedkj
First Name Matt and Rebekah
Last Name Jameson
Address 907 Los Altos Trail
Phone Number Field not completed.
(Optional)
City Southlake
State TX
Zip 76092
Disclaimer
This form is to provide feedback on planning & zoning -related requests. Your
comments are placed in the related case file as a matter of public record and
forwarded to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council if action is
required by these bodies. Your submission of this form shall not be considered a
formal protest under Section 211.006(d) of the Texas Local Government Code
unless your signature is uploaded and submitted with this form.
Disclaimer Yes, I understand
Acknowledgment
Signature (For Formal C1623545-952A-4C4C-90D5-D43CCE056BD2.ioe
Protests)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA22-0037 Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-796
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS PORTION OF
LOT 1, MALIK ESTATES ADDITION, AND A PORTION OF
TRACTS 1A01A2B AND 1A01A2C, BEN J. FOSTER SURVEY
ABSTRACT 519, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 30,380 SQUARE FEET, AND
MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
FROM "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO
"SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AS
DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B",
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and
to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-1A" Single
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 1
Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading
spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on
the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-
crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,
water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 2
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed
at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there
has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the
tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally
classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or
tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the
citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare
of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as a portion of lot 1, Malik Estates Addition, and a portion of tracts
1A01A2B and 1A01A2C, Ben J. Foster Survey, Abstract 519, City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 30,380 square feet, and more fully
and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 3
District to "SF-30" Single Family Residential District, as depicted on the approved
Concept Plan, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject
to the following conditions:
City Council:
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of
land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 4
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that
if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of
said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
6*1:101 M01E:1
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 5
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required
by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
BEING a portion of Lot 1, of Malik Estates Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the Map thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5711, of the Plat Records of
Tarrant County, Texas, and being a tract of land described in deed to Parvez Malik and Seema Malik
as recorded in Instrument No. 0213052304, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas,
(D. R. T. C. T.), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2inch iron rod found for corner, said corner being at the Northeast corner of Lot
I of said Malik Estates Addition, said corner being in the South line of Lot 22, Block 1, of the Palomar
Estates, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the Map thereof
recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 12338, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being at the
Northwest corner of Lot 20, Block I, of said Palomar Estates;
THENCE South 00 degrees 25 minutes 23 seconds East, along the West line of said Lot 20, a
distance of 308.28 feet to a 112 inch yellow -capped iron rod found for comer, said comer being on the
West line of Lot 4C of said Palomar Estates, being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein
described tract;
THENCE South 00 degrees 25 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 101.05 feet to a point for
comer, said comer being along the West line of Lot 19 of said Palomar Estates;
THENCE South 89 degrees 29 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 310.00 feet to a point for
comer, said comer being in the East line of Randol Mill Avenue;
THENCE North 00 degrees 25 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 59.70 feet to a point for
comer; THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 23.00 feet to a 112 inch
yellow capped iron rod set for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 25 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 41.39 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 287.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING and containing 30,380 square feet or 0.70 of an acre of land
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 1
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for approved Site Plan
Case No. Attachment F
ZA22-0037 Page 1