Item 4R - Memo9
CASE NO: ZA22-0038
SOUTHLAKE
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
September 13, 2022
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Rainey Court at 4078 N. White Chapel Blvd.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: HW Builders, LLC, on behalf of Marzell Evans, is requesting approval of a
Preliminary Plat for Rainey Court on property described as Tract 15, R.D. Price
Survey, Abstract No. 992A, City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas, and located
at 4078 Nn White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "SF-1 A" Single
Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #1.
DETAILS
The property is located at the southwest corner of North White Chapel Blvd., and
West Bob Jones Road.
The purpose of this request is to seek a Preliminary Plat in conformance with the
Rainey Court Concept Plan (ZA22-0011) to develop a subdivision consisting of
four (4) one acre lots on a site currently totaling 4.75 acres.
Site Data
Existing Zoning
Summary
SF-1A
Land Use Designation
Low Density Residential
Gross/Net Acreage
4.75/4.01
Residential Lots
4
Gross / Net Density
0.84 DU/Ac. / 1.0 DU/Ac
Open Space %
N/A
Lot Area Range
43,569 — 43,694 s .ft.
Average Lot Area
43,642 s .ft.
Case No.
ZA22-0038
ACTION NEEDED: Consider Approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated, August 25, 2022
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
PowerPoint Presentation
Plans
Link to SPIN meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Reagan Rothenberger (817) 748-8602
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Case No.
ZA22-0038
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Marzell F. Evans
APPLICANT: HW Builders, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 4078 N. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, TX 76092
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 15, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992A, City of Southlake, Denton
County, Texas
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1 A" Single Family — 1A
HISTORY: "AG" Zoning District was approved with the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance No 480 and the official Zoning Map on September 19, 1989.
"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District zoning and a Concept Plan,
were adopted on June 7, 2022 with case ZA22-0011.
SOUTH LAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for the site is Low Density
Residential.
Purpose and Definition: Purpose
Residential land use category is to
provide for and to protect low
intensity detached single-family
residential development that
promotes the openness and rural
character of Southlake.
Definition (this definition was
updated by passage of Ordinance
No. 1186 on February 20, 2018):
The Low Density Residential
category is for detached single-
family residential development at a
The purpose of the Low Density
Future Land
Use
4078 N. white LhapC
Blvd.
0.ae�d
""••
�oar�.�Fwae nm�
� w�o=aie�vM.�P�wm
net density of one or fewer
dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net
acre, which excludes acreage in all rights -of -way, easement, and lots
designated for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those
permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public
categories. The Low Density Residential category encourages the
openness and rural character of the City of Southlake.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA22-0038 Page 1
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Southlake 2035 Mobility Plan under the Pathways Plan, there is a less
than 8-foot sidewalk designation proposed on the west side of N. White
Chapel Blvd. and south side of W. Bob Jones Road. No sidewalk currently
exists along any boundary of the property. A minimum 5-foot sidewalk is
required for this property.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Access to the lots will be provided through a 50-foot right of way with a
concrete street connecting to W. Bob Jones Road, a 60' ROW C2U
Collector. Access from W. Bob Jones Road leads to N. White Chapel Blvd.,
70' ROW C2U Collector. The development will not have direct access to N.
White Chapel Blvd.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development.
TREE PRESERVATION: Site is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D.
The submitted Tree Conservation Analysis complies with the Tree
Conservation Analysis approved with the Zoning and Concept Plan. There
is 47% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 50% is required
to be preserved after excluding the existing tree cover within the proposed
right-of-way. After excluding the existing tree cover within the proposed
right right-of-way there is 44% of existing tree cover, and a minimum of
22% is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve
71.2% of the existing tree cover.
UTILITIES: A 12-inch water line is located along both N. White Chapel Blvd. and W.
Bob Jones Rd. for sufficient water supply and looping. Currently, there is
an 8-inch sewer line located along N. White Chapel Blvd. for sanitary
sewer service.
DRAINAGE: The property generally drains from the west property line east to N. White
Chapel Blvd.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on February 4,
2022.
A SPIN meeting was held February 8, 2022.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMMISSION ACTION: Approved; (5-0), subject to Staff Report dated September 2, 2022, and the
Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated August 25, 2022.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated August 25, 2022
Case No. Attachment A
ZA22-0038 Page 2
Vicinity Map
4078 N. White Chapel Blvd.
LW
v 43M v —
0 F
co
CD
0 0
M m
V V
4250 4251 EQUESTRIAN DR
W (PARK RD)
345
0
0
0
NORTH FIELD DR
j (PARK RD)
J
ca
o J
0 o w
N c CD
CO p O
M O O
m M RANCjsf RD U
o F-
Q1 N O
, ZA22-0038
_ Preliminary Plat
f'
0 90 180 360
--�� Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA22-0038 Page 1
Case No.: ZA22-0038
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Review No.: One
Project Name: Preliminary Plat — Rainey Court
APPLICANT:
HW Builders, LLC — James Cox
17480 Dallas Pkwy #217
Dallas, TX 75287
Phone: 972.931.1006
Email: jamesc@kwhomes.com
Date of Review: 8/25/22
OWNER:
Marzell F. Evans
9426 Braddock Road
Fairfax, VA
Phone: N/A
Email: N/A
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
08/25/22 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT REAGAN ROTHENBERGER AT (817) 748-8062.
1. The following changes are needed per Sections 3.02 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as
amended.
2. Place the City case number ZA22-0038" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat.
3. Revise the title block to include "Denton County".
4. Correct the Site Data Summary chart on all sheets to reflect Existing Zoning as SF-1A. Remove
"Proposed Zoning" from the Summary Chart. Correct the net area to show gross area less all
Right -of -Way.
5. Although easements are required along the perimeter of the subdivision per Section 3.02(d)(22),
staff recommends providing only where needed for the extension of utilities to aid in tree
preservation.
* The plat must comply with the underlying zoning on the property.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0038 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
* The submitted Tree Conservation Analysis complies with the Tree Conservation Analysis
approved with the Zoning and Concept Plan. There is 47% of existing tree cover on the site and a
minimum of 50% is required to be preserved after excluding the existing tree cover within the
proposed right-of-way. After excluding the existing tree cover within the proposed right right-of-way
there is 44% of existing tree cover, and a minimum of 22% is required to be preserved. The applicant
is proposing to preserve 71.2% of the existing tree cover.
7.2 STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL:
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b., a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan
shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage
requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to
development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall
be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% — 20%
70%
20.1 — 40%
60%
40.1 % - 60%
50%
60.1 % - 80%
40%
80.1 % - 100%
30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights -of -way as approved by City Council.
* The submittal of a Tree Conservation Plan which conforms to the approved Tree Conservation
Analysis will be required with the submittal of a Final Plat.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0038 Page 3
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Public sewer shall be located within ROW or an easement. Please clearly show the
existing ROW along White Chapel to ensure that the proposed sewer extension is located
within ROW.
2. Cross lot drainage shall be contained in a closed system or a rear lot line swale designed
to handle the 1 % storm event and shall be located within a drainage easement. Lots 3
appears to be draining onto Lot 4. If the runoff from Lot 3 is proposed to drain onto Lot 4 and
then into the bar ditch along N. White Chapel, then a private drainage easement will be
required.
* The drainage flow is increasing offsite with the proposed conditions. Discharge of post
development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the
provisions of Ordinance No. 605. If detention is not being proposed for the increase in runoff,
then documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required
prior to approval of construction plans.
* The required separation distance for water and sewer isn't met at the end of the cul-de-sac
between the fire hydrant and sewer line.
*=Denotes informational comment that don't need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Sandy Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0038 Page 4
Fire Department Review
No Comments
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
The following should be informational comments only
Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483,
Article/Section 5.06 as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. Sidewalks shall be required on
both sides of all public and private streets in all residential subdivisions platted or replatted after
the effective date of this ordinance. Each owner/home builder within a residential subdivision
platted after the effective date of this ordinance shall construct sidewalks at the time of
construction of the house. In those circumstances where a sidewalk would impact the
construction of driveways and access walks, the sidewalks shall be constructed before the City's
final building inspection. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until required sidewalks are
in place. (If practical difficulties are determined to exist, the estimated cost of construction can be
escrowed with the City and included with a future sidewalk installation.)
Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the
intent of this requirement.
The Preliminary Plat must conform to the underlying zoning of the property.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0038 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
SPO
#
Owner
Zonin
g
Physical Address
Acreage
Response
1
LEGACY LIMITED, LLC
RE5
300 W BOB JONES RD
1.48
NR
2
SADDLEBACK ACRES LP
SF1-A
4301 SADDLEBACK LN
0.39
NR
3
LEGACY LIMITED, LLC
AG
4060 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
1.00
NR
4
MAHONE, MATTHEW J & LEIGH
ANNE
SF1-A
4000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
5.18
NR
5
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
AG
1.48
NR
6
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
AG
3901 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
0.01
NR
7
NAVARRO, ISRAEL
SF1-A
100 KING RANCH RD
0.94
NR
8
BAKER, KIMBERLEY A & PATRICK A
SF1-A
104 KING RANCH RD
1.02
NR
9
COTE, MICHAEL P & SUNISA BERRY
SF1-A
108 KING RANCH RD
1.00
NR
10
PHALEN, DAVID & GINA LISA
CANNOVA
SF1-A
200 KING RANCH RD
1.04
NR
11
KAVANAUGH, PETER
SF1-A
204 KING RANCH RD
1.01
NR
12
SADDLEBACK ACRES LP
SF1-A
4306 SADDLEBACK LN
4.97
NR
13
SADDLEBACK LANE LLC
SF1-A
4305 SADDLEBACK LN
1.04
NR
1000
EVANS, MARZELL F TR
AG
4078 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
4.49
U
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Fourteen (14)
Responses Received within 300': In Favor: 0 Opposed: 0 Undecided
Case No.
ZA22-0038
0
Attachment D
Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS' RESPONSES
None Received by 911212022
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0038 Page 2