Loading...
Item 4Q - MemoSOUTHLA14CE PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT September 13, 2022 CASE NO: ZA22-0039 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Highland Terrace EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of H. Creek Development, LLC., Spry Surveyors is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Highland Terrace on a portion of property described as Lot 1 R1, Block 1, Southlake Assembly of God Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 101 E. Highland Street, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #7. DETAILS: The property is generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Highland Street. The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a preliminary plat for 9 single family residential lots on 5.358 acres consistent with the approved zoning change and concept plan under Case ZA22-0018. ACTION NEEDED: Consider Plat Approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Presentation Plat and Plans STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker Patty Moos (817) 748-8067 9817)748-8269 Case No. ZA22-0039 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: H. Creek Development, LLC. APPLICANT: Spry Surveyors PROPERTY SITUATION: 101 E. Highland Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of property described as Lot 1 R1, Block 1, Southlake Assembly of God Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" — Single Family Residential District HISTORY: A plat showing for Lot 1, Block 1, Southlake Assembly of God Addition was approved by City Council on September 4, 1984. (ZA84-39). A special exception use permit for a church and church related activities was approved on September 4, 1984. (ZA84-39). The zoning was changed from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District with the adoption of Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 480 in 1989. A plat revision for Lots 1 R1 and 1 R2, Block 1, Southlake Assembly of God Addition was approved on October 20, 2009 was filed on June 21, 2010. (ZA09-037) A land use plan amendment and zoning change and concept plan was approved June 21, 2022 for Highland Terrace. (CP22-0001 and ZA22- 0018) SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2035 future land use designation was recently changed from Public/Semi-Public to Medium Density Residential for the southern 5.4 acres. The 1.5 acre church site retains the Public/Semi-Public designation. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan indicates N. White Chapel Blvd. as a divided 4-lane divided local street with 88' of right of way. The street has recently been constructed according to the Master Thoroughfare Plan recommendation. The proposed residential street will have a 50-foot right- of-way dedicated with the development. PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: The Pathways Master Plan indicates a <8-foot sidewalk along N. White Chapel Blvd. As part of the recently widening of N. White Chapel Blvd., an 8-foot wide concrete trail along the east side of the street was constructed with the project. The applicant is proposing 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the proposed cul-de-sac. Case No. Attachment A ZA22-0039 Page 1 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions N. White Chapel Blvd.is an 88-foot, 4-lane divided arterial. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development. TREE PRESERVATION: The submitted Tree Conservation Plan conforms to the Tree Conservation Plan approved with the Zoning and Development Plans (ZA22-0018), and additional trees are proposed to be preserved along the south property line of Lots 7, 8, and 9. There is 19.47% of existing tree cover on the site and a maximum of 18.57% of the existing tree cover was proposed to be preserved. On the Tree Conservation Plan submitted with the Preliminary Plat, a maximum of 63.33% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. There are storm drains proposed on the east sides of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, which may cause the alteration of trees designated to be preserved on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan. UTILITIES: An existing 12-inch water line is located along N. White Chapel Blvd. There is an existing 6-inch sewer line along the east side of the N. White Chapel Blvd. and an existing 6-inch sewer line along the east property line. DRAINAGE: The drainage generally flows to the east from N. White Chapel Blvd. CITIZEN INPUT: A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on February 7, 2022. A SPIN meeting was held for this project on May 10, 2022. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: September 8, 2022; Approved (5-0) subject to the Staff Report dated September 2, 2022, and the Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 2, 2022. Case No. Attachment A ZA22-0039 Page 2 Vicinity Map 101 E. Highland Street g 3W _, 212 39 2D4 I, 12Hi \ , 3W ae 3D1 f S § 3 a � 10 3w § & HIGHLAND ST m, 20 z, , 5, 3Wq, 2 § - - 1050 a \ ,GBLU # «,# £ „ ■LO 1o48 , » _ 114,1 1042 19 2 ® 22e 22 1� 1035 73 °°° ,2 NO m, I,I ® m ) @f @G30 DRAGON D &, @ar + DC VE E K R § & ,H 10 TH 12 ,& 111 ,n k _ ASCOT DR ASCQT � ,■ -�, � � \ . ZA22-0029 Preliminary Plat ' O 90 ]8O 360 Feet � Case No. ZA22- Dag Attachment B Page PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA22-0039 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 09/2/22 Project Name: Preliminary Plat — Highland Terrace APPLICANT: Spry Surveyors David Lewis 8241 Mid -Cities Blvd. #102 N. Richland Hills, TX 76182 Phone: 817-776-4049 Email: david@sprysurveyors.com OWNER: H. Creek Development, LLC Kosse Maykus 604 E. Northwest Hwy. #102, Grapevine, TX Phone: 817-329-3111 Email: kosse@maykus.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/31/22 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT Patty Moos AT (817) 748-8269. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email: pmoos(a)ci.south lake.tx.us 1. After approval of the preliminary plat, a plat revision will be required and will need to include the remainder of Lot 1 R1, Block 1, Assembly of God (Section 3.06, Ord. No. 483). 2. Correct the residential density (Section 3.02.D.30, Ord. No. 483) to reflect 1.68 DU/acre in the Land Use Summary Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin(c�ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: There are storm drains proposed on the east sides of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, which may cause the alteration of trees designated to be preserved on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan. A protected tree shall be considered to be altered if one or more of the following occurs: more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the critical root zone is adversely affected, more than twenty- five percent (25%) of its canopy is removed, or the tree is disfigured to the extent a reasonable person would conclude the tree will not survive. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan conforms to the Tree Conservation Plan approved with the Zoning and Development Plans, and additional trees are proposed to be preserved along the south property line of Lots 7, 8, and 9. There is 19.47% of existing tree cover on the site and a maximum of 18.57% of the existing tree cover was proposed to be preserved. On the Tree Case No. Attachment C ZA22-0039 Page 1 Conservation Plan submitted with the Preliminary Plat a maximum of 63.33% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be reserved* 0% — 20% 70% 20.1 — 40% 60% 40.1 % - 60% 50% 60.1 % - 80% 40% 80.1 % - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights -of -way as approved by City Council. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Sandy Endy, P.E. Development Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendyC�ci.south lake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: * This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the civil construction plans. * Please be aware that the profiles are not being reviewed at this time and will be reviewed during construction plan review. * Sewer lines that have less than 3-feet of cover shall be steel encased. Case No. Attachment C ZA22-0039 Page 2 Retaining walls greater than 4-feet in height, measured from the bottom of footing to top of wall, shall require a separate permit. *=Denotes informational comments that will need to be addressed on the first submittal of the Civil Construction Plans. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8223 E-mail: kclements(a)-ci.south lake.tx.us FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with sprinklered and un-sprinklered homes. (Add a fire hydrant between the two indicated on the plan to meet the necessary distance requirement). The following should be informational comments only All conditions of the approved under zoning change and concept plan approval under Ord.480- 794, Case ZA22-0018, granted a variance to the existing tree coverage preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-E and approved the tree preservation plan as presented; and noted that the replacement fence on the north and east boundary will be 8-feet in height. A Plat Revision must be approved and a Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off -site sewer extensions, off -site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA22-0039 Page 3 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT SF1-A 1205 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.20116932 NR 2. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1200 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.149336492 NR 3. NAYANA, SOMESHWAR AG 181 E HIGHLAND ST 0.744167986 NR 4. ABDELQADER, AWAD SF20A 201 E HIGHLAND ST 0.662104137 NR 5. IWOOD, J C AG 11180 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.541913861 NR 6. HANES, ERIC SF20A 221 E HIGHLAND ST 0.533582259 NR 7. SHENOY, SHIVPRASAD SF20A 211 E HIGHLAND ST 0.540838631 NR 8. CHANDRA, PUNIT SF20A 231 E HIGHLAND ST 0.29139198 NR 9. BRYAN, LISA AG 1170 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.339438654 NR 10. HOME, BRIAN RPUD 208 MARIE CIR 0.191183942 NR 11. BULLOCK, TYLER RPUD 212 MARIE CIR 0.47656202 NR 12. BUSH, KYLE AG 1160 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.251416918 NR 13. ALLEN, MITCHELL SF1-A 1150 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.192018251 NR 14. BESSE, RICHARD E RPUD 216 MARIE CIR 0.366856186 NR 15. SILVEROAK LAND DEV CO LLC RPUD 1100 TINA TRL 0.091121206 NR 16. PATY, BARBARA ANN Cl 1020 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.382580954 NR 17. SZKUDLAREK, MARK T RPUD 220 MARIE CIR 0.466669068 NR 18. FLAK-FRANKLIN FAMILY TRUST, TH RPUD 224 MARIE CIR 0.1476375 NR 19. PATY, BARBARA ANN AG 1000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.631788229 NR 20. NEMETH, LAUREL R SF20A 913 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.331639566 NR 21. LAMB, MARKS SF20A 915 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.468762117 NR 22. CHAKRABORTY, SAMRAT SF20A 917 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.466449252 NR 23. YAO, GANG SF20A 919 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.469446049 NR 24. KING, RORY SF20A 921 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.460949052 NR 25. CARRIZAL, ALBERTO SF20A 923 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.615410093 NR 26. DUNN, NINA LOUISE AG 960 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.123936819 NR 27. DUNN, NINA LOUISE AG 950 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.162253368 NR 28. TABORSKY, DAVID SF20A 925 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.196663371 NR 29. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT SF1-A 1241 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.363005987 NR 30. TEDFORD, GARETH SF20A 924 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.471171336 NR 31. CARROLL, ISD NRPUD 900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 2.795013068 NR 32. CHON, SAMUEL RPUD 228 MARIE CIR 0.36753754 NR 33. SAPP, STEVEN SF20A 922 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.45372037 NR 34. ANDERSON, MAYBELLE SF20A 920 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.4475937 NR 35. GOSWAMI, ANUJ SF20A 918 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.446964504 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA22-0039 Page 1 36. ARORA, DEEPAK SF20A 916 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.440646573 NR 37. PATEL, JIGNESH SF20A 914 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.458897215 NR 38. DECAMP, CORRIE SF20A 911 DOVE CREEK TRL 0.488007713 NR 39. BURGERT, TANIA RPUD 204 MARIE CIR 0.352722775 NR 40. LAFAVERS, DORIS AG 303 E HIGHLAND ST 0.991634251 NR 41. HIGHLAND OAKS HOA INC RPUD 1201 ROTHSCHILD BLVD 1.524728939 NR 42. METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS SP2 335 E SH 114 15.08915182 NR 43. SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL ISD NR 44. SOUTHLAKE CH ASSEMBLY OF GOD CS 101 E HIGHLAND ST 6.853811507 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Forty-three (43) Responses Received: None (0) Case No. Attachment D ZA22-0039 Page 2