January 1986 - December 1986 P&Z MeetingI�
I
0
7
u
11
'A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
January 14, 1986
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 85-45 Final plat of the North Davis Business Park.
19.9249 acre tract of land out of the T.J.
Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1502. Located
in Southlake Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
2. Consider: Master Plan.
3. Discussion: Zoning Ordinance.
I hereby certify that the avove agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, January 10, 1986 a 4 p.m.
City Secretary
ME OF
MMISSIONER
d
H
0
z
cn
n
o
z
a
Cnn
d
<
a
I
<
a
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: January 14 ,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Billy
'
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis and Carroll McDaniel.
Rick Stacy arrived at the meeting
'
for the last agenda item.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineer;
Eddie Cheatham and Director of Public
'
Works; Bill LeGrand.
The meeting was called to order by
chairperson, Stoner.
toner
x
Curb
x
The Minutes of the December 10, P & Z
yman
x
x
Meeting were approved as presented.
rper
x
or h i s
x
cDaniel
x
x
ZA 85-45 The final plat of North
ZA 85-45
Davis Business Park was considered.
APPROVED
The property is located in the City
of Southlake extraterritorial jurisdic-
'
tion.
'
Joe Lipscomb was present representing
the owners. He presented a letter
from Bob Goode concerning drainage.
The letter is apart of the record.
There were no comments from the
toner
x
audience concerning the plat.
urb
x
After discussion, motion was made and
asper
x
approved in favor of recommending that
Norman
x
the final plat be approved.
x
x
Iorhis
cDaniel
x
x
Bill Stoner informed the commission
that a worksession"will be held on
January 27, at 7 p.m. Present will be
Council, P & Z and Citizens Select
Committee. The session will be to
'
discuss the master plan.
'
'
i�NIE OF
MMISSIONER
rn
o
0
z
d
o
--�
0
z
d
z
�c
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: January 14,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
A discussion was held on the zoning
ordinance and the schedule of district
'
regulations.
The proposed master plan was discussed.
It was noted that the City Council
informally approved the plan, however,
they added restrictions to Highway 114.
City Council wants a 50' street in the
area running parallel to Highway 114.
When developed, Council wants the fund
for the street put in an escrow
account ready to develop the street
'
when the time comes.
Cheatham noted that when talking to
the State Highway Department (Mr.Hardy)
they were very much against the idea
of the 50' roadway mentioned above.
Charles Curry explained the Citizens
Select Committee masterplan guidelines.
Joe Bentley of Woodland Heights
Addition spoke and was very opposed
'
to the master plan in regards to that
area in which he lives.
Stoner
x
Curb
x
Motion was made to table action on the
Kasper
x
x
master plan until the next P & Z meeting.
'
Norman
x
x
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
Stacy
x
by Bill
The meeting was adjourned
Stoner.
F
J•,,
Re pectfully submit
AanVaZ(L�. LeGrand
City Secretary ��
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
January 28, 1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-1
2. ZA 86-2
3. Discussion:
4. Consider:
Zoning request for Lot 1 and part of Lot 2,
Block D, Oak Knoll Lakeview Addition, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County.
Current zoning is Agricultural to Light Commercial.
Location: Southeast corner of Hwy. 114 and
Austin Place Street, Oak Knoll Lakeview Addition.
Owner: McMahan Properties.
Public hearing.
Request to Replat Lots 4 and 6, Block A of the
Southlake Bank Place. Making Lots 4A, 4B, 4C,and
6A, Block A.
Owner: Birdsong Properties.
Public hearing.
Zoning Ordinance.
Master Plan.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday 24, 1986 at 4 p.m. /1
City Secretary
'
tNIE OF
MMISSIONER
d
o
0
z
n
oz
ti1
d
o
H
o
z
Cnn
>
z
d
d
a
>
z
y
d
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: January 28 ,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Billy
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Jim Vorhis,
Carroll McDaniel and Rick Stacy.
COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Ed Norman.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand, and City Engineer;
'
Eddie Cheatham.
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Johnny Wester -
holm.
Stoner
x
x
x
The Minutes of the January 14, P & Z
k*urb
asper
x
Meeting were approved as presented.
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
Stacy
x
ZA 86-1. The zoning request change
ZA 86-1
'
for Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Block D
ZONING
of the Oak Knoll -Lakeview Addition,
was considered for Light Commercial
'
use. Present zoning is Agricultural.
Owner of the property, David McMahan
was present and answered questions for
'
the commission. He indicated he wishes
to place small office spaces in the
'
future building. He stated the reason
that he first felt the land was suitable
for this is due to the fact that it
fronts on Highway 114 and also because
it falls in a noise cone. He added
'
that he plans for aerobic system to be
placed on the property for sewage
'
disposal.
McMahan stated he plans to pave the
alley in the area behind his location.
John Levitt, engineer for the owner
stated the alley is a dedicated parcel
but used as a utility easement.
They plan to replat the land and at
that time, they will abandon the alley
'
and use the land for a 15' utility
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
�
0
9
z
n
z
d
0
H
z
�
a
m
t7
-3
d
M
a
z
y
'-3
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES Regular
OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: January 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
easement.
It was established that proper notices
'
have been given and property owners
within 200' have been notified. There
were 4 replies by mail and one phone
'
call into city hall.
During the public hearing:
James H. Sandres - opposed and he
presented a petition from property
owners opposing the action.
Norris Graham - opposed.
Eugene Bump - opposed.
Vic Layton opposed.
John Quinn - opposed.
=
Joe Bentley opposed
Dale Marks - in favor.
'
Jackie Smith - in. favor.
It was noted that there is already
one office building in the subdivision
'
(Dr. Tate) and that all property
owners adjacent to the property in
questions were in favor, others in
'the
subdivision were opposed.
Stoner
x
Curb
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
Kasper
x
and approved to deny the request.
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
Stacy
x
x
ZA 86-2. Request to replat Lots 4 & 6
ZA 86-2
Block A, of the Southlake Bank Place
REPLAT
Addition was made by representative,
'
Steve Gilbreath of Birdsong Properties.
Cheatham is to contact City of
Grapevine concerning access easement
off of Industrial Street in Grapevine.
During the public hearing: Gary
'
Fickes was concerned over the sewage
situation in the addition. Also that
parking on Bank Street is such a big
'
problem.
'
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
d
0
0
cn
n
z
M
0
z
a
�
a
z
d
oy
d
a
a
z
y
C
oy
d
`rl
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: Janaury 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
toner
x
After discussion, motion was made to
Curb
x
approve the replat subject to his
asper
x
obtaining access off of the service
orhis
x
road and Cheatham getting approval
McDaniel
x
x
from the City of Grapevine for
�tacy
x
x
access from Lot 4.
A discussion was held in regards to
the zoning ordinance. Mike Monroe
'
gave a presentation and reviewed
proposed changes for the commission.
The Master Plan was discussed by the
'
Commission and Mike Monroe.
The public had comments which include:
Joe Bentley -gave a presentation and
passed out literature.
Dennis Mender- spoke on aircraft and
'
cone arbas.-
Russell Levins - spoke on economics.
Larry Jenkins - spoke on area and
'
natural beauty.
Daryl Smith -
Sonny James- Meadow Oaks wants
protection, does not want to be
covered up by industrial zoning.
Louis Kapasta-progr-ess has consequent
s
David Whitington- Christ Our King
'
Church.
Bill Meiser- Woodland Heights.
Patricia Patterson - Crooked Lane
'
Rick Lovelace - Woodland Heights.
Carlos Dorris - Woodland Heights.
Johnny Westerholm-
'
John Martin - Woodland Heights.
Pamula Muller - Woodland Heights.
Mrs. W.A. Johnson -Woodland Heights.
Aloa Payne- Whispering Dell
Stoner
x
W.A. Johnson - Woodland Heights.
urb
x
x
..asper
x
x
Motion was made to table the discussi
n
'Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
Stacy
x
y►
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
d
0
H
o
n
0
z
Cn
d
-3
d
>
z
y
-3
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: January 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4 INDEX
With no further business, the meeting
was adjourned.
Respectfully su mitte(114 `
;h �t F
andra L.LeGrand
City Secretary =�•'• ' ' `''
t
t
1
7
u
11
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
' REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
February 11, 1986
' 7:30 p.m.
I
AGENDA
' 1. ZA-86-7 Zoning request for 15.7 acres of land out of the
Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
' Current zoning is Agricultural to Light 'industrial.
Location: East Southlake Boulevard, East of Crooked
Lane on Southside of road.
' Owner: Jon C. Genrich
Public hearing.
2. ZA-86-8 Preliminary Plat Phase I approval for the Stacy
Office and Warehouse Site. The 15.7 acres of land
is out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474.
' Location: East Southlake Boulevard, East of Crooked
Lane on Southside of road.
Owner: J.R. Stacy
' Public hearing.
1
' I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, February 7,1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
H
0
z
om
o
z
t7
y
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and Rick
'
Stacy.
'
ABSENT: Billy Jon Curb.
CITY STAFF: City Engineer; Eddie
Cheatham and Director of Public Works;
'
Bill LeGrand.
COUNCILPERSON: Davis Bradley.
The meeting was called to order by
chairperson Stoner.
Stoner
x
Kasper
x
x
The Minutes of the previous meeting
Norman
x
were approved as presented.
' Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
Rick Stacy stepped down for the meeting
'
as having a vested interest.
'
ZA 86-7. The zoning request for a
15.7 acre tract of land out of the
Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract 474 wa
considered. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for the Light
'
Industrial Zoning District.
Stacy noted that after the last survey,
'
the land measured 11.852 acres of land.
It was established that property
owners within 200' were notified and
proper notice was given. There were
Stoner
x
no replies.
Kasper
x
-Orman
x
x
There were no comments during the
orhis
x
public hearing.
' McDaniel
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
and approved to recommend approval,
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
emu-
t7l
x
o
3
o
z
n
n
z
rn
o
�
z
a
z
d
C
y
d
a
�
z
Cn
C
-��
e
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
2
ZA 86-8. The preliminary plat for
Phase I of Stacy Office/Warehouse
'
Site was considered.
Cheatham review letter was reviewed
'
and all items were corrected for will
be corrected before it goes to the
city council.
'
During the public hearing, Mr. & Mrs.
Pritchard stated they were in favor
of the plat. Mike Vail also had no
objections.
toner
x
asper
x
Motion was made and approved to
man
x
x
recommend approval of the preliminary
his
FcDaniel
x
x
plat.
x
The meeting was adjourned by Stoner.
Respectfully submitted,
T H C q
Sandra L. LeGrand
'
City Secretary:
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
'
THE STATE OF TEXAS
'
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
'
BEFORE ME,
the undersigned authority,
in and for said
State of Texas, on this
day personally appear
'
who after being by me
duly sworn, did on oath soea,
e that
,,
That he has no personal interest in such property, but,
and that it is his intention, as
of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to abstain
from participation
in any matter,
'
wherein, said property may be affected.
Sig at re of
Elected or Apppointed
Cit fficial
of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF
OFFICE this the
day of
e,l , 19
.
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89 %
Filed with me, this the �� day of , 1 9 at.
o'clock p.m.
' City Secretary, City of South]ake
J
THE STATE OF TEXAS
' COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
I
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath st to that
That he has no personal interest in such property, but,
and :that it is his intention, as MdAGQd�,,�of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to abstain from participation in any matter,
' wherein, said property may be affected.
(2CA�-
Si at e of Elected or Apppointed
Cit fficial of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
GIVE UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the l` day of
19
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89 / jlj
Filed ith me, this the %� day o� , 19oGaat
o'clock p.m.
' City Secretary, City of' Southlake
I
February 22,1986
`
/
Planni"g and Zoning Committee
SouUhlake, Texas
--
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief thaL [he current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular characteristics of each community.
N� Sincerelv.
'
NAME ||\��` -_----
N� ADDRESS_�L\�� ���{��]��_�����_________
PHONE__
February 22,19B6
.
w� Planning and Zoning Committee
Sout|dake, Texas
Dear Mrs:
N� It i= my sincere belief that he current proposal concerning
~~ buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city,, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particularcharacteristics of each community.
Sincerelv.
PHONE_ L
February 22,l-
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas .
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal conc.^ `
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinanc~ /
inadequate. �
,
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applip'/
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should ad''
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular -characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAM[ 4,
ADDRESS����
_--_--_-_''
February 22,lr�'`
Planning and Zoning Committee
9outhla1.:-.e, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
,
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular -characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE_�___���-VoM__________________
February 22.1�,,
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoninq ordinance is
inadequate. �
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular characteristics of each community.
NAME__
ADDRESS
���
February 220996
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal conce"ni/.0
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance ,s
inadequate. �
^
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAME__�� _ ( t���� t,
� .�
ADDRESS wl / c� f-� �~�� co ���� ��
________
PHONE t-�� //^76)-Z__~
February 22,l� ''
'
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerni/.g
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
"
I urge You to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAME (\J
^l ,~ ����9�
ADDRES��_�,�/ ^7 ~
+-�������________
J '�
PHONE ____k���,_«___�__________________
February 22,1986
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake° Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
,
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particularcharacteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAME_
ADDRESS_
PHONE___
February 22,l�'`'
.
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake~ Texas
Dear 5irs:
N� It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised �uthlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our ciLy, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
S ly,
NAME
N� ADDRESS ^���
PHONE__ 6_��_�__________________
Li
i
February '2'', 19
Planning 9 and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
'
Dear Sirs:
'
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate.
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
OLAr city, specifically the revised ordinance should addre-;=
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
'
Sincerely,
NAME
T
PHONE -��
February 22,I9S6
Planning and Zoning Committee -
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate.
'
"
'
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our city, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular -characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
NAME___ _____------
ADDRESS22, «4
PHONE___
February 22",
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised, Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate.
I Urge YOU to reconsider the requirements to be applied co
ot.ir city, spec i f i cal 1 y the revised ordinance shoi;l d addr E s:
thF-� unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
Sincerely,
ADDRESS_AMY _ rU
----------
PHONE 4/O" -77�% ---- --- ----- ---
�
I -
11
February 22,1986
'
Planning and Zoning Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear Sirs:
N� It is my sincere belief that he current proposal concerning
�—
buffer yards for the revised, Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. y
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our ciLy, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular- characteristics of each community.
n c er e l
February 22,l986
Planning aod Zooing Committee
Southlake, Texas
Dear c.3irs:
It is my sincere belief that the current proposal concerning
buffer yards for the revised Southlake zoning ordinance is
inadequate. �
"
I urge you to reconsider the requirements to be applied to
our ciLy, specifically the revised ordinance should address
the unique rural character of our city, as well as the
particular -characteristics of each community.
Sincerelv'
NAME
ADDRESS__-=���__��e��m�����k_________
PHONE
February 22.198L�
1
' F'liAnning anci Zoning Committee
Soc_cthlake, Texas
C) F? a r r i. r ::' ;
' It i--; my si ncer e bel :i. Erf t:.liat_ � hL= cccr rent pr (:)pc:isal concerning
buffer yards for the revised zoninc) ordi nancR is
i nadegc..cate.
I urge you to re(-_-:c)ri<.sicler- the requirements to be applied to
cx.cr c i ky, spec i f i cal 1 y t he_y rezvi sed ordi nance shoal d addr ess
the uriigc.ce rc_cra.l. charac:ter of our city, as well as the
p,�_art.ic:c.c1a.r charac:t:eri.sti.cs cf each community.
' Sincerely,
' ��j -
FA
N A r1l E LA-t,
PHONE
' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
' REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
February 25,1986
' 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
' 1. ZA 86-3. Request to replat Lot 1B of the Crumbaker Addition.
Making Lots 1B1 and 1B2.
' Location: North Shady Oaks Drive.
Owner: Daniel R. Ahlers.
Public Hearing.
' 2. ZA 86-4. Zoning request for Lot 2, Crumbaker Addition.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for
the A-3 Single Family District.
' Owner: Michael Fox.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-5. Preliminary plat approval for Susanna Place Addition.
' Location: North Shady Oaks.
Owner: Fox and Lee.
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-6. Preliminary plat approval, of Lot 1 of the Dowd
Addition. Location: Tract 8U and 8A1C, of the J.
' Whitman Survey, Abstract No. 1593.
Owner: David Dowd.
Public Hearing.
' 5. ZA 86-8.
1
1
i
Final plat of Phase I of the Stacy Office and Ware-
house Site.
Location: East Southlake Blvd., west of Bank Street.
Owner: J.R. Stacy.
6. ZA 86-10. Zoning request for Lot 5, less right-of-way to State
Highway 114. Lot 6, Block D of the Oak Knoll -
Lakeview Addition. Current zoning is Agricultural
request is for the Light Commercial Zoning District.
Location: Southwest corner of Highway 114 and Austin
Place. Owner: Jackie Smith.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, February 21,1986 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
d
rr
z
o
o
z
Cn
n
z
Cn
y
z
d
�
d
n
a
z
y
e
Ti
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
'
Bill Stoner. Vice -Chairperson; Billy
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and Rick
Stacy.
1
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand, and City Engineer;
'
Scott Dyer.
The meeting was called to order by
'
Chairperson, Stoner at 7:30 p.m.
The citizens of Oak Knoll -Lakeview
Addition, Woodland Heights and Meadow
Oaks Additions have ask for a work -
session with the Planning and Zoning
Commission. After polling the commiss-
ion, Stoner stated the session would
be at 7 p.m. on March 11,1986.
Stoner
x
The Minutes of the previous meeting
lurb
x
were approved as presented.
asper
x
x
Norman
x
orhis
x
cDaniel
x
x
tacy
x
Stoner announced that agenda item
x
#6. ZA 86-10 will be tabled at the
ttoner
urb
x
owners request due to illness.
Kasper
x
x
Motion was made and approved to table
x
x
the agenda item.
�orman
orhis
x
cDaniel
x
�tacy
x
ZA 86-3. The request for the replat
of Lot 1B of the Crumbaker Addition,
making Lots 1B1 and 1B2 was discussed
as requested. Paul Minie, from Fox
and Lee, represented the owner, Daniel
R. Ahlers. John Short, engineer, was
also present and answered questions fo
the committee.
The Cheatham review letter was discussed.
IE OF
rgISSIONER
d
r�
H
o
z
n
d
O
z
D
can
y
t�
C
a
a
C
o
Z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
It was established that proper notice
'
had been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per law.
There were no comments during the publ
c
hearing.
'
After discussion, motion was made and
Stoner
x
approved to recommend approval of the
Curb
'Kasper
x
x
x
replat with the approval of the
Susanna
Preliminary plat approval of
Norman
x
x
Place Addition.
Vorhis
x
x
'McDaniel
Stacy
x
ZA 86-4. The zoning request for Lot 2,
ZA 86-4
Crumbaker Addition was considered for
A-3 Single Family District Zoning.
The current zoning is Agricultural.
It was established that proper notice
'
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per
law.
During the public hearing, Mr. Crum -
baker ask about screening his 5 acres
of land which is currently zoned
Heavy Commercial. The property
is adjacent to the property in
question. It was determined that
if he improves the property currently
zoned Heavy Commercial and comes to
the city for additional building per-
mits, at that time, the screening
would be covered in the site plan.
Stoner
x
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
Furb
asper
x
and approved to recommend the zoning
Norman
x
x
be changed to A-3 as requested. The
rhis
x
motion is contingent on the property
Daniel
x
in Lot 1B2 is already being zoned A-3.
acy
Lc
x
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
z
o
-�
o
z
n
z
Cn
a
z
e
d
a
>
z
y
d
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
ZA 86-5. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-5
Susanna Place Addition was presented
'
to the commission. James Caffey,
engineer was present and answered
questions for the commission.
'
The Percolation Tests are currently
pending approval of the city engineer.
'
Susanna Place is a replat of Lot 1
and Lot 2B of the Crumbaker Addition.
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
Cheatham is asked to address the
drainage in writing and have ready
before the plat goes before the City
Council.
Ftoner
Curb
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
asper
x
and approved to recommend approval
orman
x
of the preliminary plat of Susanna
orhis
x
x
Place.
McDaniel
x
ttacy
x
x
ZA 86-6 The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-6
Lot 1-of the Dowd Addition was
discussed. David Dowd, owner, was
present and stated he has owned the
'
property since 1981. He indicated
that the reason for the replat is to
combine his two tracts of land.
Mr. Dowd has ask that the 100' of land
be vacated as it ingresses into his
property. Hillcastle is currently
'
500' long, included that which goes
into his property. There will be
three homes on Hillcastle Lane and
the need for a cul-de-sac is not
there, in his opinion.
The other two property owners on
Hillcastle, spoke an agreed with Mr.
Dowd, that the 100' should be vacated.
i
IE OF
IrIISSIONER
z
rn
-3
0
z
z
rn
r�
0
�
0
z
y
z
rn
a
d
a
n
>
z
y
oy
d
�
0
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 25,1986
7:30 p.m.
TIME:
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4 INDEX
They include; Robert McNutt and
Tim Schuetz.
'
Billy Jon Curb stated he feels that
even though we do not have cul-de-sacs
on the other streets in the Raintree
area, we should not give up the land
and the cul-de-sac when we have the
'
opportunity to build the cul-de-sac .
Mr. Dowd is also asking for a 2S'
building line all the way around the
property.
After discussion, motion to approve
wner
x
the plat with the elimination of a
rb
x
utility easement on the back of the
Kasper
x
property, a 2S' building line and
x
vacation of the 100' roadway into
(orman
orhis
x
x
the property.
cDaniel
x
tacy
x
x
The motion was seconded and approved
to recommend with the above conditions
Rick Stacy stepped down for the
'
next agenda item as he has a vested
interest in the request.
ZA 86-8. The final plat of Stacy
ZA 86-8
'
0 ice Warehouse Site was discussed.
John Short represented Mr. Stacy and
answered questions for the Commission.
The Cheatham letter was addressed
'
and they agreed to all the corrections
except the streOt lights.
'7'
J ME OF
MMISSIONER
a
t7
r''
a
0
z
n
�
rn
o
0
z
�z
cn
y
z
d
0
a
a
n
z
0
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
Regular
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: February 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 5 INDEX
Mr. Stacy presented an agreement
'
on possible sewer forithe project.
Snap Inc. will allow a tie -on to
sewer from the Bank Place Project,
to Stacy Office/Warehouse Site.
toner
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
urb
and approved to recommend approval
asper
x
of the final plat.
Orman
x
x
Vorhis
x
x
x
No further business, the meeting was
�cDaniel
adjourned by Stoner.
'I.AH�C``'yy
Respectfully submitte4l.peg......
'
Sandra L . LeGrand
City. Secretary
t
1
-A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: WORKSESSION WITH MASTER PLANNER
March 3,1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Discussion: New zoning ordinance draft.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, February 28,1986 at 4 p.m.
h'Z4' / / 'Pk��
City Secretary
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
March 11, 1986
WORKSESSION: 7:00 p.m.
' REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
7:30 p.m.
' AGENDA
1. ZA 86-11 Zoning request for Tract 2A and 2A4 of the
Beedy Thomas Survey, Abstract No. 72.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for
' A-1 Single Family District.
Owner: Dr. Thomas H. Brittain.
Location: North Peytonville, south of Old
' Orchard Estates.
Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-12 Preliminary plat approval for Brittany Place.
Location: North Peytonville, south of Old
Orchard Estates.
Owner: Dr. Thomas H. Brittain.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-9 Gift of Love Plat of Lot 1 and 2 of Hanna
Addition.
Location: North Kimball Road and North of
Highway 114.
Owner: Ruth Hanna
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carrol Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, March 7, 1986 at 4 p.m. IZA-"
ity Secretary
'
'
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
e
t-n
0
H
o
n
d
0
H
z
Cn
n
Z
t7
-3
d
>
a
z
Cn
y
e
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice Chairperson; Billy
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
'
Jim Vorhis, and Carroll McDaniel.
ABSENT: Rick Stacy.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of
Public Works; Bill LeGrand and
'
City Engineer; Scott Dyer.
A worksession was held from 7 p.m.
until 7:30 p.m. at the request
'
of citizens from the Woodland Heights
Addition. Purpose was to discuss
the master plan.
The regular Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting was called to
loner
x
order by Bill Stoner at 7:30 p.m.
The minutes'of the previous meeting
Curb
x
were approved as presented.
x
x
fsper
rman
x
x
orhis
x
Rick Stacy was absent, due to being
Daniel
x
out of town.
- request for
ZA 86 11. The zoning q
ZA 86-11
Tract 2A and 2A4 out of the Thomas
Beedy Survey, Abstract 72, was
considered for A-1 Single Family
Zoning. Owner, Dr. Thomas Brittian
'
was present for the meeting and
answered questions.
It was established that proper notic
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per
ordinance. Nine notices were sent
with one reply by mail.
H.R. Williamson was opposed.
1
'
'
ME OF
OMMISSIONER
d
t7i
o
H
z
n
d
o
H
o
t1rj
d
d
n
H
z
y
d
n
�0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: MARCH 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
John Levitt, engineer, was present
and represented the developer,
David McMahan.
'
During the public hearing, Johnny
Westerholm stated that zoning to the
north is A-3 Single Family.
David McMahan said a deed restriction
will be added to the property and
' Stoner
x
that the square feet minimum would
be 3,600 for each home.
Curb
x
fVasper
orman
x
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
and approved to recommend approval
orhis
x
of A-1 Single Family Zoning.
cDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-12. The nreliminary plat
of Brittanv Place was discussed. The
Cheatham letter of review was dis-
cussed and John -Levitt addressed
the items in the March 11, letter.
During the public hearing, Johnny
'
Westerholm had comments about the
existing house on the property.
'
It was established that the property
to the north and east have an
existing 15' utility easement,
'
according to the Old Orchard Country
Estates plat.
x
Motion was made and approved to
rStoner
Curb
x
recommend approval with the -addition
Kasper
x
of a dedication of land for future
Norman
x
x
road to continue to the south from
Vorhis
I
x
x
the end of Brittany Place Court.
McDaniel
x
I
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
0
0
z
Cn M
n
d
0
0
z
W
cn
y
z
r
0
-3
d
>
H
z
0
y
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
'
ZA 86-9. The gift of love plat
ZA 86-9
of Hanna Addition was reviewed by
the commission. Michael Sutton
'
was present, representing Mr. & Mrs.
Hanna.
The affadavit was signed by Mr. & Mrs
'
Hanna, stating they are giving the
son, Richard Hanna, the acre of land
'
for a gift of love.
Motion was made and approved to
recommend approval of the plat
the addition of existing
'with
utility easement for overhead
Stoner
x
power lines and with the ingress -
Curb
Kasper
x
x
x
egress easement being increased to
20' 72' utility easement
Norman
x
x
with a
around the property.
Vorhis
x
' McDaniel
x
The meeting was adjourned by Stoner.
Re ectfullyf stLbm tted,s,L q
Sandra L. LeGrand
Larch 11, 1980
1
and ?oning Commission
City o,3oiithl ake
i'
Dear
As a concerned citizen of aouthlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's .'oning Ordinance, including the
proposed T and Use ;':ap. While a:any aspects of your -roposal have
I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) 2he unbalanced concentratio:l of commercial and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
Leadow Caks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a. few aonled interests, at the exrense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
(') 'he-'afferyard section of tie proposed ordinance
fail-s to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. 7o attempt has been made
to miti-3ate the dama?es Which the proposed plan
111 inflict on residents of this sector. :o
reco`nition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' fors,.-urther:iore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' T"nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland T7ei.,-hts, i eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' pror.osal should never be adopted.
1
NA:
• �i G'C I
IA!"' al.2_ Z-��, s7�2 - --X
Sincerely,
' Larch 11, 1986
1. to: d "toning commission
cC 7c; it:llake
As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T,and t�se %:ap. While many aspects of your proposal. have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
- (1.) The unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total_ disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland -Heights,
I:eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(2) r-he zoning- district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
(3) "'he *i�ufferyard section of the -proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "?o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages Which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. :o
reco-nition of the extraordinary predicament of
these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rig}its of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' forw. ;'urtherruore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
1
17nless and until the rights of the many residents of
wooiland Ieights, Meadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal_ should never be adopted.
,�41 - 5- (. (�, Z
Sincerely,
-.arch 11, 198>
1
It,sr:ninh and ?oning Commission
City of aoi.ithl ake
I)e'lr I a rs :
As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T and 1. se Lap. 'Jhile many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(i) --,e unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total. disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland 4eights,
;.eadow Gaks, and Oak -Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(?) the zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
majority of the residents of this sector, whose
freauert and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
'
(3)
^he ':=ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
'
in the southeast sector. 7c, attempt has been made
to mitigate the damaZes Which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. ..o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
'
these homeowners is indicated.
In
",,Iew of these serious failin-s to address the needs and
co?,cerns
of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
'
because of
your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary
protective provisions for the welfare and property
riElits of
the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
'
form. i urthermore,
I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose
this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' t'nless and until the rights of the many residents of
+Joodl and F-eiZ-hts, meadow Gaks, And Oak Knoll. T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
i:arch 11, 1986
l
1
ki r:1 ?caning commission
^,sty of withlake
1)esr -airs
As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed Tand t.'se %,ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) ',he unbalanced concentration of commercial and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
,:e adow Caks, and Oak iinol.l T.akeview Addition.
' (-) Phe zoning• district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few :ponied interests, at the expense of the vast
wajority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) -Dufferyard section of the -proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
' in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages Which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. : o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rlE.hts of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
fort:.. : urtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' 1',nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland Heights, rieadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll. T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few lard
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
Q.�
47G _ _
Ii..arch 11, 1986
?oning Commission
Ci u J of aolitlake
De.a-, sirs .
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed Tand Use ;"ap. 4hite many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) -.pie unbalanced concentration of commercial- and
industrialuses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
::endow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(2) i`he zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few �.,,onied interests, at the expense of the vast
' wa jority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (:) ''he 1ufferyard section of the nroposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious 1-and use conflicts
' in the southeast sector. "?o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. ..o
recognition of the extraordinary predicaaent of
' these homeowners is indicated.
Ta view of these serious failings to address the needs and
co :uer3�s of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary rrotective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
for:L. Furthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to appose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' t'nless and until the rights of the many residents of
'woodland ::eights, Meadow Gaks, And Oak Knoll. Takeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
syec;sl:ators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' pro? osal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
�L4 _ - -
r
I,:arch 11, 1980
nd 7oning Commission
Ci r�, of Su,.ittll ake
De-ir =i.-s
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
pro,-osed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed Tand Use A:ap. bile many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I relieve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) !Iie unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
Industrial. uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
t:eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T.akeview Addition.
' (2') The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' a:ajority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The Eufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious 'Land use conflicts
' \ in the southeast sector. T'o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. :.o
recognition of the extraordinary predicawent of
these homeowners is indicated.
In 'view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rig;}its of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
fora. .%urtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' t'nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland �'Feights, P•eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
, proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
a-
' y�/ 7377
ri..arch
11, 1980
'
FitInnln:�
and Toning Commission
Ci t;, of -)oixthl
ake
1
De-ir -,irs.
:,s
a concerned citizen of Southlal;e, I have studied the
1
proposed
revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed
T And Use i;ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I
believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
1
(1. )
iiie unbalanced concentration of commercial and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total disregard for the proper and reasonable
1
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
Eeadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(2)
the zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the exT,ense of the vast
'
majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (�3) Phe : ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. No
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
1 these homeowners is indicated.
La view of these serious failings to address the needs and
1 coricerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
1 fors;. I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
1 "nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woo,il.and Heights, Meadow Gaks, And Oak Knoll T-akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
1 proposal should never be adopted.
1 Sincerely,
1
1
i,:arch 11, 1980
and ?oning Commission
ri t;;, of :ioiithl ake
�Jer'aT' > i rs .
' As a concerned citizen of Southl akle, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T-and t'se ,';ap. while many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) the unbalanced concentration of corumercial. and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disre`ard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
Lendow Oaks, and Oak Knoll Takeview Addition.
' (2) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The {ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. T'o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. 710
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' fora. rurtheru,ore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' I'nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland Ieights, meadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll. Lakeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
' 91ncerel y,
A
1
arch 11, 1986
ar- 'oning Commission
;r of aolithl.ake
' De,a'. i r s :
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
prod -used revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed Tand I'se Lap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) ltlie unbalanced concentration of commercial and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
f,:eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a fear -: onied interests, at the expense of the vast
U! jority of the residents of tiiis sector, whose
frequent and reasonabl.e petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) "-i:e=ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. ::o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to Include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
form. furthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' 1n1ess and until the rights of the many residents of
woo:;lcind Heights, Meadow Oaks, And Oal� Knoll T.akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' p`ror-:osal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
;;arch 11, 1980
1
Tlanning and Zoning Commission
City of-'�olzthl.ake
Gear airs:
As a concerned citizen of 3oiithlalre, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed. T and Use ,•:ap. 'Aihil e many aspects of your proposal have
z:erit, I relieve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) ,he unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in iNoodland Heights,
:,eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(?) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frecuent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The P-ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. No
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. i'urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' ,finless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland eights, i-;eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T.akeview Addition
are recognized and given enual consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
A"17
ri,.arch 11, 1986
'oning commission
-.'I r.-1 of 3u:at:ilake
As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's mooning Ordinance, including the
proposed T.and Ilse LLap. While many aspects of your proposal. have
' merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) the unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland heights,
Eeadok Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) Phe zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few raonied interests, at the expense of the vast
' a:a jority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) :'he <ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. .10
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
t co:,.,.erns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
riF.hts of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
fora. i-urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
ITnless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland freights, Meadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll_ T.akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
specul.ators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
1
".arch 11, 198(,
and Toning Commission
Ci t;), of `3 ithl ake
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision ofthe city's Zonin Ordinance, including the
proposed T:and use L'ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
' merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1 ) !'tie unbalanced concentration of commercial and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland geights,
Leadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(2) the zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector .reflect absolute and total protection of
'
a few :Honied interests, at the expense of the vast
majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
(3) ^'he r=ufferyard section of the rroposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious Land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
gill inflict on residents of this sector. :o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
'
these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' eor:cerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. :urtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' i?nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woo. -hand Heights, Meadow Caks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are; recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
sreculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
/t-_ ; .
,.arch 11, 1960
11 .L:J.° and ?oning Commission
ri t_; of .ioixthlake
' I;e..r- irs .
' As a concerned citizen of outhl aloe, I have stiidled the
proTosed revision of the city's :',oning ordinance, including tiie
proposed T,and 1.se ,•;ap. 4hile many asrects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) the unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland :iei;ghts,
f:eadow Oaks, and Oak iinoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) Phe zoning- district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a fear monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) `'he T'ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed clan
will inflict on residents of this sector. „o
reco,nition of the extraordinary predicament of
these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious fail invs to address the needs .nd
concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
' because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. rurtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
C�
Unless and until the rights of the many residents of
Wocdl and Heights, i;eadow Gaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given eoual consideration with the few land
speculators, wiiose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
.A:.�
A.
l�g70�Z,
Sincerely,
' Larch 11, 19
and Toning Commission
^1 t y of Soixthl ake
' De r -airs .
t As a concerned citizen of -Douthlal,,e, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's :rr Ordinance, including ti,e
proposed T,and Use Lap. While:any aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) 2he unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial.uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total. disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
Leadow Caks, and Oak rinoll T.akeview Addition.
' (2) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the exrense of the vast
' majority of the residents of tt:is sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
he '-�ufferyard section of the r-,roposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. 'To attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed rlan
will inflict on residents of this sector. .,o
reconition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. Furthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
.+nless and until the rights of the many residents of
`,doo :l and Heights, i;eadow Oaks, And Gak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and riven eoual consideration with the few land
srecul.ators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
i
Larch 11, 1986
',oning Commission
Mt;, of 3o>>t'!il ake
' De-.r ,irs :
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed Land Use :':ap. while many aspects of your proposal have
merit. I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) The unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
;.endow Oaks, and Oak !r nol_l Lakeview Addition.
' (2) The zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
:'he T2ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. "To attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. ..o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious fall.inas to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form.-lurtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' t-Inless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland heights, meadow Oaks, And Oak Knol.1. Takeview Addition
area recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
LAST Woop ct
`�8�-Lto84
1
1
r—
' ,.arch 11, 1986
'oninz Commission
thl ake
-e:- ,ir.5.
' As a concerned citizen of 3outhla1{e, I have studied the
o",:used rovision of the city's toning Ordinance, including the
,r4-,r�.,sed Tand L'se Lap. 4hile a:any aspects of your proposal. have
I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) --he unbalanced concentration of commercial and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disreZard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland 'heights,
..eadow Cal{s, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) she zoninz district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' ;�.a jority of the residents of this sector, whose
frecuert and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) -he --lufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. ''o attempt has been made
to mitizate the dama?es which the proposed plan
-.:ill inflict on residents of this sector. :o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' cor:c.erns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary rrotective provisions for the welfare and property
rig2:ts of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. ?urthermore. I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' 77nless and until the rights of the many residents of
aoc land "eights, i eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll Takeview Addition
are recoxnized and riven equal consideration with the few land
szecilators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
GrS�1C1 S� d LL
1
' v.arch 11, 1980
"toning Commission
Ci t;, of-io�ithlake
' ',�w ;:a concerned citizen of 3outhlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city`s Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T,a,nd Use .":ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit. I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) Phe unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total. disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
t.eadow Caks, and Oak Xnol_1. T,akeview Addition.
(2) Phe zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the exrense of the vast
maJority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The �ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fail-s to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed Man
will inflict on residents of this sector. : o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
r co, .erns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form, ;'urthermore, I will urge other residents of southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' ;'nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woc'atand Heights, Meadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
spec:til.ators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
?IA., AV.,3 -Z-eA ✓e4s -
Sincerely,
�2� Z,.,oe�
i,.arch 11, 1986
d ?oninz Commission
c.,' lolithl ake
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T.and t se ;,:ap. ;chile many asrects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1 ) T'he unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total. disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland ieights,
I:eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) i'he zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the exl:,ense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
(3) ?'he --'ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious Land use conflicts
N in the southeast sector. �'o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages Which the proposed rlan
will inflict on residents of this sector. 'do
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
beu>>zse of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rl-wlits of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' for w. i'urtherwore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' unless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland Heights, ifeadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll Takeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal. should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
:ze_ �4
!,:arch 11, 1980
Fl�r::�ir T and Zoning Commission
City of 3o?ithl.ake
De: r i rs
' .is a concerned citizen of ',outhlake, I have studied the
pro osed revision of the city's 'oninti Ordinance, including the
proposed T,and i.*se ;':ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) !tie unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
Industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
,'.eadow Oaks, and Oak rinoll T,akeview Addition.
(2) the zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
( ) 7-he :lufferyard section of the -proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
' in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. :,o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failinz;s to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. furthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' i+nless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland Heights, i,eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
s_—,oalators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
L
' Larch 11, 1986
- !-1 -oninz Commission
i - - of ;o i thl ake
. e-... irs .
' ,'s a concerned citizen of >outhlake, I have studied the
z'ro,,-osed revision of the city's Toning ordinance, including the
:-ro.rosed T.and Use ,,'ap. '"ihile puny aspects of your proposal have
er±t. I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' C 1 ; _''tie unbalanced concentration of cormnercial and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total. disreSard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
;.eadow Caks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
{^i :he zoning district boundaries in the southeast
Sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' ajority of the residents of this sector, whose
frecuent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by You.
' (-j) -he 7�ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
falls to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "'o attemn_t has been made
to mitigate the damaTes which the proposed rlan
::ill inflict on residents of this sector. :o
reco'znition of the extraordinary ?)redicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' coni,,erns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary rrotective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' forty. r'urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' 7Trless and until the rights of the many residents of
_,4003land '"eights, i eadow Caks, And Oak Knoll Takeview Addition
are recog-nized and given enual consideration with the few land
spec:al_ators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' rrorosal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
17
1 ia.arch 11, 1986
Y i ,.. -., :.
s 1 -oninz Commission
1
o, i t hl ake
is
a concerned citizen of ,outhlake, I have studied the
'
1-rc;'osed.
revision of the city's 7,oning ordinance, including the
Try r� used
T and Use t:ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
L.er± t, I
I:alieve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
'
f1;
;the unbalanced concentration of commercial and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
total. disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland 4eights,
.11 .eadow Gads, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
:i1e 4 onin• district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a fear monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' f:a jority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
ry you.
' (3) -Tie -'ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
falls to ameliorate the obvious land izse conflicts
in the southeast sector. 7o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed rlan
+ill inflict on residents of this sector. :o
recognition of the extraordinary rred.1cament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
in view of these serious failings to address the needs and
of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
' becl=nse of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this 'plan in its present
' forty. z,urthermore, I will. urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' ,Tnless and until the rights of the many residents of
"400"ll and j-"eights, Meadow Gabs, And oak Knoll. Takeview Addition
are recognized and given eoual consideration with the few land
srec il.ators, wl:ose properties have been so well protected, this
' r:rci-.>sal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
�l
1 !.:arch 11, 198(
"oning Commission
i f � 1 ake
is :, concerned citizen of Douthlalce, I have studied the
..Ca rr�•vision of the city's :�oning Ordinance, including the
r �rosed T :rind se ,,ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
_e.r1t, I t �.11eve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) -he unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland qeights,
..eadow Caks, and Oak 1'noll T,akeview Addition.
' (?) he zoning- district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absol.ute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' ::a jority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
�y you.
' -he 7ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
' to mitigate the damaffes which the proposed rlan
will inflict on residents of this sector. :o
reco=-nition of the extraordinary predicament of
1 these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
1 because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary rrotective provisions for the welfare and property
riElits of the residents, I must oppose this r.,l.an in its present
' for:. _-urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southl.a'rce
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
1 "mess and until the rights of the many residents of
400 l and .-eights, ,':eadow Caks, And Oak Knoll T.a.keview Addition
are recoznized and xiven eoual consideration with the few land
sfecilators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
1 rro,osal should never be adopted.
1 ! Sincerely,
:. LY
1
1
I;.'arch 11, 1980
I
a 1ir-1 -oninCommission
"i w. = o,tthl ake
' 1.s a concerned citizen of 7,outhlake, I have studied the
rro,,osed rcviston of the city's :'oninu Ordinance, including the
r�ro,?ec. Tend ".'se ;ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
:czar'r, I Z-elleve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1) --tie unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
"eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
' (2) --he zoninrr district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' L:a jority of the residents of this sector, whose
freouent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The �ufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. °'o attempt has been made
to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
-v.-Ill inflict on residents of this sector. ':o
recotinition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary rrotective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
for,:. . urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to or:-ose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' "nless and until the rights of the many residents of
'Jooll and T-eights, Meadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T.akeview Addition
are recoxnized and given eoual consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so we'll. protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
i,:arch 11, 1986
Flanninx and ?onina Commission
' City of Soiithl ake
ILear `>irs :
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
proposed revision of the city's :zoning Ordinance, including the
proposed T and Use V-,ap. While many aspects of your proposal have
merit, I believe serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
(1 ) -ilhe unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Heights,
..eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T,akeview Addition.
(2) -Phe zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
a few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (3) The Bufferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
In the southeast sector. 7o attempt has been made
' to mitigate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. '.o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
' these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
form. r'urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' ,Tnless and until the rights of the many residents of
Woodland i-eights, meadow Oaks, And Oak Y•.noll T,akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
proposal should never be adopted.
Sincerely,
-a
1
;:arch 11, 19(
lrinnin. qr,d 7onincr Commission
"i t;j of ` o,i thl ake
.�e. 7,r ,Irs :
' As a concerned citizen of Southlake, I have studied the
rro,osed revision of the city's Zoning Ordinance, including the
rroposed T and 'Use Lap. While many aspects of your proposal have
:writ, I relieve serious deficiencies still exist, namely:
' (1) -The unbalanced concentration of commercial. and
industrial uses in the southeast sector reflects
' total disregard for the proper and reasonable
concerns of the residents in Woodland Hei?hts,
..eadow Oaks, and Oak Knoll T.akeview Addition.
(2) :he zoning district boundaries in the southeast
sector reflect absolute and total protection of
few monied interests, at the expense of the vast
' majority of the residents of this sector, whose
frequent and reasonable petitions have been ignored
by you.
' (?) -he -,-�u.fferyard section of the proposed ordinance
fails to ameliorate the obvious land use conflicts
in the southeast sector. "o attempt has been made
' to mitizate the damages which the proposed plan
will inflict on residents of this sector. '.o
recognition of the extraordinary predicament of
these homeowners is indicated.
In view of these serious failings to address the needs and
' concerns of the residents of an entire sector of our city, and
because of your apparent refusal to include reasonable and
necessary protective provisions for the welfare and property
rights of the residents, I must oppose this plan in its present
' form. -urthermore, I will urge other residents of Southlake
to oppose this plan and prevent its adoption by the city.
' unless and until the rights of the many residents of
,woodland '--eights, T:eadow Oaks, And Oak Knoll T.akeview Addition
are recognized and given equal consideration with the few land
speculators, whose properties have been so well protected, this
' proposal should never be adopted.
' Sincerely,
Alg
11
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 25,1986
WORKSESSION: P & Z with Citizens Select Committee
AGENDA
1. Discussion: Set -Backs on Highway 114.
2. Discussion: Resource Fees.
REGULAR MEETING: 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
6:30 D.m.
1. Consider: Master Plan.
2. Discussion: Regarding Trinity River Authority proposal on
a Sewer System for Southlake.
Public Hearing.
3. Discussion: Overlay Districts for the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
4. ZA 86-13 Zoning request for Tract 2 of the C. Dart Survey,
Abstract No. 2003. Current zoning is Agricultural,
request is for A-3 Single Family District.
Owner: Edmund E. Dotson
Location: North Peytonville and East of Shadow
Creek Estates.
Public hearing.
S. ZA 86-14 Preliminary plat approval for Peytonville Place.
Location: North Peytonville and East of Shadow
Creek Estates.
Owner: Edmund E. Dotson
Public hearing.
6. ZA 86-15 Zoning request for Tracts 4G and 4D1 of the
O.W. Right Survey, Abstract No. 899.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request if for
Heavy Commercial District.
Location: East of 1709 and West of South Carroll
Avenue.
Owner: Cynthia Hughey.
Public hearing.
I hereby certify that the avove agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, March 21, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
0
z
0
z
y
z
CD
a
y
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
PLANNING AND ZONING COM14ISSIONERS:
Chairperson, Bill Stoner, Vice -
Chairperson, Billy Jon Curb. Ted
Kasper, Ed Norman, Jim Vorhis, Carroll
McDaniel and Rick Stacy.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineers;
Eddie Cheatham, Scott Dyer and Directo
'
of Public Works; Bill LeGrand.
COUNCILPERSON: Davis Bradley.
Stoner
x
lurb
x
The Minutes of the March 11,1986
asper
x
x
Planning and Zoning Meeting were
Norman
x
approved as presented.
x
this
cDaniel
x
x
Stacy
x
Chairperson, Bill Stoner commented
on miscellaneous correspondence he
had delivered in the packets to
the commission.
'
A short discussion was held regarding
the Trinity River Authority (TRA)
proposal on a Sewer System for South -
'
lake. There were no comments from
the audience during the public hearing.
'
When asked, City Engineer, Eddie
Cheatham commented that his opinion
of the sewer system proposal is that
it is good and if we don't accept,
'
we will someday have to go it alone.
He added, it is always better to
participate and he recommends we
'
spend the money.
A discussion was held on the Overlay
t
Districts for the Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages.
Stoner asked Planning and Zoning
'
Commission to give the overlay district
locations some thought and that he
will poll them at the next meeting.
'
'
'
IE OF
IMISSIONER
a
t7
t"
t-nr�
o
0
z
CIO
n
d?
0
z
�
cn
>
o
d
>
a
z
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COWIISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
2
Charles Curry was asked to ask the
'
same question to the Citizens Select
Committee.
Stoner named the area of I.B.M. and
'
Kimball Avenue at Hwy 114 as designate
areas. If a person applies out of
a designated area, they would have to
'
apply and go through regular procedure
.
This is an example of an overlay
district.
'
ZA 86-13. The zoning request for TR 2
ZA 86-13
of the C. Dart Survey, Abstract 2003,
ZONING
'
was considered for A-3 Single Family
District. The 2.851 acres of land is
'
currently zoned Agricultural.
Mr. Edmund E. Dotson, owner of the
property was present for the meeting
'
and answered questions for the
commission.
It was established that proper notice
'
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per
'
ordinances. There was one reply
in favor of the request.
Stoner
x
Curb
x
Motion was made and approved to
Kasper
x
x
recommend approval of the zoning
Norman
x
change as requested to A-3.
Vorhis
x
x
'McDaniel
Stacy
x
x
ZA 86-14. The preliminary plat for
Peytonville Place Addition was
discussed. Mr. Dotson, agreed to
'
comply with the Cheatham review
letter. It was pointed out to
'
Mr. Dotson, when he asked, that he
must have percolation tests before
the final plat will be considered.
1
'
'
NrE OF
C MISSIONER
0
z
m
H
0
z
can
z
d
d
a
v
Cn
oy
e
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
Stoner
x
Motion was made and approval given
Curb
x
to the preliminary plat, for a
x
x
favorable recommendation to the City
'Kasper
Norman
x
Council.
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
' Stacy
x
ZA 86-15. The zoning request for
ZA 86-15
Tracts 4G and 4DI of the O.W. Knight
ZONING
'
Survey, Abstract 899 was considered
for Heavy Commercial Zoning. The
current zoning is Agricultural.
'
Scott Martin; was present and
represented the owner, Cynthis
Hughey.
It was established that 10 notices
were mailed out and one reply receive
'
in favor. Two phone calls were
received, also in favor.
During the public hearing the following
'
persons spoke:
Marion Smith- not notified.
'
Larry Jenkins- wants it tabled until
a master plan is approved.
Jim Burger why heavy commercial?
Ed McHenry- goes against the proposed
'master
plan.
Stoner
x
Joe Bentley- comments.
Curb
x
Kasper
x
After discussion, motion was made
Norman
x
to deny the request for Heavy
Vorhis
x
Commercial Zoning District.
' McDaniel
Stacy
x
x
x
x
The proposed master plan was discussed
Joe Bentley presented a map, which
included the comments of citizens
'
from the Woodland Heights, Meadow
Oaks and Oak Knoll -Lakeview Additions.
1
'
NWIE OF
1MISSIONER
x
o
y
o
z
Cn
z
9
y
z
C
d
a
a
z
Cn
C
d
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: March 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4 INDEX
After extensive discussion in which
'
Joe Bentley, Sonny James and Larry
Jenkins had comments, motion was
made to recommend approval of the
Stoner
x
master plan with the attached map
Irb
x
x
and with approval of the concept of a
sper
x
parallel road on the north side of
Norman
Highway 114 from White Chapel to
x
Kimball Avenue.
arhis
Daniel
x
Stacy
x
Stacy wanted it in the record that
he opposed only the parallel road
'
on the north side of Highway 114.
With no further business, the meeting
was adjourned by Bill Stoner, chair-
person.
'
�`��etoanrrpgq
Respectfull ub itted,�
'
n ra L L ran x _
.
City Secretary
�r�,rr/111l11111►11�``
1
I.
' March 25,1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
' City of Southlake
Southlake► Texas 76092
Attention: William F. Stoner► Chairman
Dear Sirs.
' As per your request of March 11, 1986. I have prepared a
summary of our position on the proposed Master Plan► along with
supporting maps. Also find a summary of a study which examines
' the balance of land use conflicts throughout the city.
After reviewing these materials, I believe you will better
' be able to appreciate our perspective on the Master Plan. Be
assured that we believe a solution is obtainable through reasoned
compromise. Understand as well, that we believe no attempt at
compromise has yet been made, and that our legal rights have been
' ignored until now. Hopefully, the district boundaries in our
sector can be redrawn to better reflect a truly representative
proposal which considers the rights and interests of all property
owners.
' Again let me em hasize► we do not require total victor in
9 P q Y
this conflict► but neither will we accept total defeat.
' Sincerely,
VeKtl
' See enclosures
' Copies: Members, P&Z
Commission
t
The citizens
of Southlake residing in the communities of
Woodland Heights
and Meadow Oaks are deeply interested in the development
of an adequate
land use plan
for the city. This paper addresses many of
our concerns and
'
needs. In
materials from
addition to our own opinions, we have utilized planning
the North Central Texas Council of Governments and
Southlake - A
Land Use Study, by Hensley -Farmer.
' In the study by Hensley -Farmer, several guiding principles are emphasized
which we all should keep in mind. Foremost of these is the need to adopt a
land use plan which represents a consensus of opinion of the community.
Along these lines, community goals are a primary consideration. To quote
from Hensl
ey-Farmer sT s�tucy, 'rTFie citizens are of the
strong opinion that
it is in
the best interest of the general welfare
of the citizens to
'
preserve
possible.
the rural character of the community to
Granted there are other opinions regardng
the maximum extent
this, but the con-
sensus is
quite clear." Elsewhere, in discussing methodology in developing
the land
use plan, their study further advises, "to
the maximum extent
' possible, the types of uses, amounts and locations will reflect the
expressed consensus of opinion of the citizens of Southlake."
' Leaving generalities behind and moving to specific issues in Southlake, we
quickly realize the impact of DFW airport on our city. By now, we are all
familiar with the noise contours and zones which have been superimposed on
' our landscape. The communities of Woodland Heights and Meadow Oaks are
virtually entirely within Zones A and B, rspectively. Furthermore, their
proximity to Zone C and the airport itself necessitates additional con-
sideration.
Reading briefly from the text provided by the North Central Texas Council
of Governments concerning these zones, we learn that in Zone A, "few
' activities will be affected by aircraft sounds .... Also in areas closest to
the airport, open air activities may be disrupted.... Otherwise, so far as
aircraft sound is concerned, generally all uses may be acceptable."
' After studying all these materials closely, and utilizing other valid
resources, the citizens of Woodland Heights and Meadow Oaks have just cause
for great concern when viewing the proposals for land use in our sector.
' While the concern exhibited for land use under the noise zones is correct
in general, we believe there has been an overemphasis of the noise factor
in our community. The result has been a proposal which ignores other
' equally compelling factors. While it is proper and correct for the city to
be concerned about the economic impact of the noise zones on property
values, you must not ignore or forget the equally devastating economic
' impact of incompatible development intruding upon two existing communities.
Furthermore, if there is any concern for collective or individual liability
for potential damage to future developments, then it would be prudent also
to consider the question of liability for actual damages to existing
' developments.
Without belaboring every point of our opposition, we simply believe the
property rights of the citizens of Woodland Heights and Meadow Oaks must be
r respected and protected by the city. This cannot be done if our small
communities are surrounded by a huge commercial/industrial development of
the proportions proposed.
The following summary presents a citywide analysis of the
impact of the proposed Master Plan on each subdivision or
addition in the city of Southlaker as depicted on the proposed
Land Use Map. The district boundaries were as then depictede and
have been little changed since. Specifically, the boundaries
within the southeast sector were as depicted on the last
available version of the "blue line map" and assume no revisions
to those boundaries.
The analysis is simplistic in its approach, examining the ratio
of compatible land use to incompatible land use along the
perimeter of each subdivision or addition. The percentages shown
represent the degree of incompatible land use bordering these
areas. While this method is somewhat one-dimensional, it is
considered valid, since land use conflicts arise from both
boundary, or proximity, as well as the ratio of land areas
involved in the conflicting uses.
Meadow Oaks
Oak Knoll Lakeview
Woodland Heights
Briarwood
Crumbaker Addition
Gregg's Country Acres
Old Orchard Country Estates
Diamond Circle Estates
Lakewood Acres
7 small additions
100
100
81
59
35
22
20
18
15
10-20
39 additions, large & small 0
Only 16 recognizable subdivisions or additions have any land use
conflict, and of these only 4 have conflicts exceeding 35% of
their perimeter.
It is obvious and easily documented that the communities of
Woodland Heights. Meadow Oaks and Oak Knoll Lakeview are being
ignored in this proposal. Meanwhiler there is no evidence that
even one property owner of UNDEVELOPED land with commercial or
industrial zoning is being required to share the burden of the
conflict which exists.
i r ,[a•.
+ ToTo
i
Mt ' ` ■ ,u ][ 7, . •, Y to
v �`V 'r ' r
r� r
.� .•.. � j i/ �! , r � .tie �o'r O �• rM � ' *� J NW": rt
'owl
/� •1 Ye er �� S ` .J�
I�LJ R� `T
j� � rt/fK � I •r
Ter
"NLT�AS
nr T'
i
■
Is T�o Ad. T
r f'7 s7 r TDM V
^� �V./A%7- (SPi sib � y
VIP
slu'!d1Nb s
Ito"waft
•aa ar
* . • L.�
r �r •� fY" �" NMDR_ Q
l IT Y.
/u11K/ afJ /e
a, a■ q an
1 � � � /1la4 •• � - rfl _
soft
slow
Tor ®. M ,; C N A L4� r ►/Lv_1�_
11 Turf
oft r • a � I l;lrfvh
"Iffilic'
1I I VTalc,
y 1 "".fw.rf AID r■ ld� to T CDwrlwlMYAI flvD, 001 sY fr
,f,a me ,>oR
-1ft
,}K
4r rr■e
r
I r IOrK
Vw
/"=K ■ .u&-jW IFti 11iY�Vi'N IG�IA IC� _
`� 1 e'Ara to /1Ry!• a//f �,./f+ Y ur
DARN(Efr
su", .... ri»1 Woe P.R. S LA1411
ItVILIN r,
JOIFDP, H. 00050
ry• ./ e+T ,vwn ant ,w ef■
-A
r
1
i
i
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING
April 8,1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Discussion:
Regarding Trinity River Authority proposal on
a Sewer System for Southlake.
Public Hearing.
2. Discussion:
Overlay Districts for the Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages.
3. ZA 86-17.
Request for Special Exception Use Permit for
a Day Care Center. Zoning is Agricultural.
Location: East Highland and South Kimball.
Owner: Robert D. Clark
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-18.
Zoning request for Tract 2D of the Hiram
Granberry Survey, Abstract 581. Current
zoning is Agricultural, request is for the
Light Commercial Zoning District.
Location: West 1709 between Shady Oaks and
White Chapel Road.
Owner: Walter E. Morris.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, April 4,1986 at 5 p.m.
City Secretary
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
o
0
z
n
d>
o
o
z
cCzi�
y
t�
d
v
z
�
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 8,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Billy
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
'
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and
Rick Stacy. * NOTE: Norman arrived
'
after agenda item #4.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineer;
Eddie Cheatham, and Scott Dyer.
Director of Public Works: Bill LeGrand
'
CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor; Lloyd
Latta and Mayor Pro Tem; Johnny
'
Westerholm.
F
The meeting was called to order by
chairperson, Bill Stoner. At the
request of Stoner, Rick Stacy sat with
the Commission, contrary to the wishes
of Mayor Latta.
toner
x
The Minutes of the March 25,1986
x
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
asperurb
x
x
were approved as presented.
orhis
rhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
'tacy
x
Agenda Item #3 will be dropped from
the agenda at the request of the
'
owner of the property in question.
ZA 86-18. The zoning request for
Tract 2D of the Hiram Granberry
'
Survey, Abstract 581, for Light
Commercial Zoning District was
discussed. The .S4 acre tract of land
'
is currently zoned Agricultural.
Owner, Mr. Walter E. Morris was present
'
and answered questions for the
commission. He indicated he wanted
to put in an antique shop or something
comparable . It was established that
'
proper notice has been given and
property owners notified. Seven
notices were sent with no replies.
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
M
o
z
cn
n
d
O
z
y
can
r
C
�
v
z
C
�
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 8,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
Stoner
Curb
x
x
There were no comments during the
x
public hearing. After discussion,
Kasper
x
motion was made to deny the request.
Vorhis
x
It was approved.
McDaniel
x
x
' Stacy
x
A discussion was held concerning over-
lay districts for alcoholic beverages.
'
During the public hearing, the followin
persons spoke:
Phillip Bressinck- over -lay districts
'
should be at all key intersections only
with no special use permit needed. All
'
other areas, permits are needed.
Charles Curry Over lay districts
on FM1709 and SH114 only. No more than
'
two corners of an intersection can be
retail. They should be 300' distance
from church, school or residence -
measuring front door to front door,
with restaurants. no ratio discussed.
Joe Wright- Against over -lay districts,
'
but look at each request on its own
merit.
George Shover- Attempt to determine
legality of over -lay districts. Traffi
.
'
Stoner polled the commission:
Stoner- over -lay districts at select
intersections.
Curb- no comment until he sees an
'
ordinance from the city attorney.
No other comments from the Planning and
Zoning Commissioners.
A discussion was held concerning TRA
Sewer System for Southlake. Mr. Wayne
Hunter from TRA was present for the
meeting. Stoner ask for input from
citizens as to whether they would
like to join TRA, or would they prefer
to seek sewer on our own resources.
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
a
y
o
3
0
z
cn
n
o
0
z
9
,z�
t7
C
v
z
c
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 8 ,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
During the public hearing:
Deryl Johnson; Sewer system is as
'
important to the city as water, next
comes transportation. Even though
there is sewer does not mean we will
loose our country atmosphere.
Joe Wright- This is our last chance to
'
be able to afford to have sewer for
the whole city. He feels that the
developers themselves will pay for
most of the costs. He feels 3.4 million
'
dollars with TRA for the whole city is
what we should do.
George Shover - need sewer but need cos
brake down first.
'
Don Mayberry- in favor of sewer. Dove
Acres.
Al Congar- for sewer. Harbor Oaks.
Charles McRae- in favor. Continental Pa
k
t
Harold Knight- in favor. E. Highland
Skip Roberts- in favor. Whispering Dell
Richard Eakins- in favor. Woodland
'
Heights.
Marcus Wayland- in favor. Raintree.
Lee Chambers - in favor. Continental
Park.
'
John Staggett- in favor. Cross Timber.
Jerrell Brown- in favor. Continental
'
Park.
Wayne Wade- in favor. N. Kimball Ave.
Susan Heinemieier.
'
With no further comments, the meeting
was adjourned by Chairnersonaq„gyl},er.
_ 0� y T t! L 4,y
'
Re pectfully s b tted, F
ndra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
It
uy�uuuu�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
April 22, 1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-20 Preliminary Plat of Greenlee Business Park
Phase II.
Location: South Kimball and North of Continental
Boulevard.
Owner: Wayne Lee
Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-22 Zoning request for Tracts 5 & 5U of the
Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for
the A-3 Single Family District.
Owner: W.C. Massey
Public Hearing.
3. Consider: Regarding Trinity River Authority proposal
on a Sewer System for Southlake.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, Friday, April 18, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
r"
o
H
0
z
rri
n
zz
d
o
0
z
�
y
rzn
c7
d
a
z
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
COriMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Billy
'
Jon Curb. Ted Kasper, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineer;
'
Eddie Cheatham, and Scott Dyer.
Director of Public Works; Bill LeGrand
'
CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Rick Stacy and
Charles Curry.
Stoner
,Curb
x
x
The Minutes of the April 8, P & Z
Kasper
x
x
meeting were approved as presented.
' -his
x
N,.jrman
x
McDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-20. The preliminary plat of
Greenlee Business Park, Phase II,
was discussed.
Proper notice has been given and
property owners within 200' were
'
notified as per ordinances. 20
notices were sent with six replies
received at the meeting. They are
'
apart of the record.
Property owner, Wayne Lee was present
'
as was his engineer; John Levitt.
Mr. Lee stated he had met with
property owners from Woodland Heights
'
Addition and he agreed with them,
that his deed restrictions would state
that structures on Lots 7,8,9,10 $ 11,
t
of Block 2, be designed to resemble
homes and that a 75' green -belt be
left between the buildings and the
homes in Woodland Heights.
It was a p reed upon that all comments
g
'
in the Cheatham letter of review,
have been met.
During the public hearing, the
'
following persons spoke:
1
ME OF
MMISSIONER
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
a
t7
0
0
z
cn
n
zz
0
o
z
9
cn
v
z
t7
C
d
>
H
z
y
C
y
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
Regular
MINUTES OF THE
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2
Larry Jenkins- ask for a 30 day
moratorium on building in that ar
so that property owners can furth
study the situation.
Dennis Mender- felt traffic would
a problem and property values are
at stake.
John Martin -opposed but ask for a
day delay so that further study c
done.
Rebecca Martin -worried about the
children in Woodland Heights with
businesses in the area and strang
people.
Bob Petty- in favor of the plat.
Jim Burger -in favor as long as th
developer keeps his word about th
buffer and the types of buildings
to be built on the property.
Bob Williams -requests the plat be
tabled until the residents and
developer can get together to wor
out the problems.
Joe Bentley -concerned over agreem
with the developer. Ratio -open s
type buildings, landscaping reaui
ments, erodable soils of land,
steep slopes, he feels the agreem
should be in deed restrictions.
Carol Wells -opposed to commercial
and resi ential next to each othe
Lee Foster- in favor.
Joe Wright- insists on answers co
cerning off -site drainage for
his property, as he did not get
answers when Phase I was approved
Stoner ask City Engineer, Eddie
Cheatham to address the entire su
drainage basin and have answers b
final plat approval is considere
including county area. Specifica
retension pond review.
PLANNING
IL CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
Da
Dr
be
30
an be
k
ent
pace,
re-
ent
r.
n-
b-
efore
d,
lly
INDE_
'
'
AME OF
OMMISSIONER
e
rr
z
0
0
Zz
ran
0
o
�
Y
z
0
v
v
z
CD
d
"ri
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBE.
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLA
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 IN.
Stoner also asked Cheatham to
address all streets, truck traffic
'and
drainage in that area of town.
Motion was made and approved to table
Stoner
x
the item for 30 days, allowing the
rb
x
x
leveloper and residents of Woodland
asper
x
leights to get together and also so
Norman
x
x
that drainage problems to the south can
x
be resolved.
Iorhis
cDaniel
x
I
ZA 86-22. The zoning request for TR 5
and TR 5U of Samuel Freeman Survey
ZA 8
Abstract 525 was considered for A-3
Single Family District, present zoning
I
is Agricultural.
The owner, W.C. Massey was not present
for the public hearing.
There were no replies by mail or from
the audience during the public hearing.
toner
x
lurb
x
Motion was made and approved to change
Kasper
x
x
the zoning to A-3 Single Family Distric
.
x
x
Iorman
orhis
x
cDaniel
x
A public hearing was held concerning
'
the possible participation in the Trini
River Authority (TRA) Sewer System.
y
Chairperson Stoner ask the audience
for comments for or against the
'
participation.
Those who spoke include:
Neil McKinnen- opposed.
'
Jerry McCroy- in favor.
Dean Bryant- had questions.
Betty Springer- formula for user fees
is needed.
Jerry Lipi- in favor.
Richard Harris - in favor.
Lee Chambers - in favor
'
Marion Smith - sewer not needed.
Larry Larson- in favor and had question
.
1
6-2
SAME OF
MMISSIONER
t7
rn
o
3
z
cn
n
�z
d
o
-3
z
a
Cn
>
ty
�
oy
d
>
a
z
y
�
e
o
�0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: April 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
4
Harold Knight- in favor
Pamula Muller - in favor
'
Dorothy Regan- in favor
Virginia Clow- in favor
C.E. Dorris- in favor
Richard Ogle- in favor
t
Betty Overstreet- in favor
Jerry Helberson-in favor.
Motion was made and approved to
Stoner
x
recommend that the City of Southlake
Curb
x
participate in the Trinity River
Kasper
x
Authority Sewer System for the
Norman
x
x
entire city.
Jr-rhis
x
3aniel
x
x
'
The meeting was adjourned by Bill
Stoner.
` c'oaqttettn4apr�
Re pectfully sub. fitted+
'
San ra L . LeGrand-
City Secretary ;
RECOMMENDED SEWER PLAN
FOR
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
BY
THE CITIZENS ADVISORY GROUP
(SEINER)
MARCH 27,1979
ames E. Burger
1 /
Harold Knight
Leonard R. Dorsett
.J . P.--True love
RECOMMENDED PLAN ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, 'TEXAS ON JUNE 5,1979.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0
Summary
1
2.0
Introduction
1
3.0
Approach
2
4.0
Data Summary
2
4.1 Cost of Sewer Line Installation ( Typical)
2
4.2 Southlake Population Trends
2
4.3 Trinity River Authority (TRA) Data
3
4.4 Grapevine Sewer Plan Data
4
4.S Colleyville Sewer Plan Data
4
4.6 Westlake Sewer Plan Data
S
4.7 Government Grant M6ney Data
S
4.8 Rough Order Cost Data
6
4.9 Sewage Disposal Data
9
5.0
Alternates Considered
11
S.1 Provide Sewer to the Entire City Immediately
11
S.2 Use Mini Treatment Plants for Subdivisions
11
S.3 Let Developers Provide Trunk Lines
12
S.4 Provide a "Spine" Trunk Line
12
S.S Join the Trinity River Authority (TRA) Now
12
5.6 Design Sewer System for Water Conservation
13
S.7 Use of Optimum Mix of Sewerage Treatment Systems
13
6.0
Conclusions
13
7.0
Recommendations
16
8.0
Near Term Action Required
17
9.0
Acknowledgements
18
1,0 SUMMARY
A Citizen's Advisory Group (Sewer) was created by the City
Council on 18 July 1978. The function of the group was to
conduct a study leading to a recommended Sewer Plan for the
City of Southlake. The Group met biweekly September 1978
through March 1979 and produced a recommended Sewer Plan for
'
the City. This plan is summarized as follows:
Create City Ordinances requiring high density housing, commercial
and industrial subdivisions to use Mini Sewage treatment plants.
The plans for these subdivisions to include a sewage plan
showing line sizes, routing, and mini treatment plant locations.
'.
The costs for the installation of the sewage system to be at
the land developers expense. The city to be responsible for
the operation, maintenance and the collection of sewage treat-
ment charges from the users. The city to be responsible for
maintaining a long range plan that shows how each subdivision
will be tied into a trunk line leading to a central treatment
plant or the TRA interceptor line. Implementation of the long
'
range plan to be initiated by the city when a central treatment
plant or the TRA interceptor extension becomes cost effective.
The mini treatment plant would become the property of the city for
use or disposal when the long range plan has bet-n fulfilled.
Where the lot sizes are 1 acre or greater and the soil has good
absorption characteristics the use of standard septic systems
should continue. The long range plan should allow these areas
an opportunity to tie on when a trunk line passes within a
'
practical tie on distance.
The city should take an active part in the resolution of current
'
septic system problems in subdivisions and other areas by pro-
viding information on potential solutions and paving the way for
the implementation of these solutions.
'
The ultimate solution to wastewater treatment for Southlake is the
Trinity River Authority (TRA) interceptor line that will come
up Big Bear Creek to serve Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville.
'
Southlake should initiate immediate action to become a member
city of TRA.
' Southlake may be eligible for Government grant money under public
law 92-500 for trunk lines, a package treatment plant or the TRA
interceptor extension. 'rhe city should initiate action for a
' grant to determine exact extent of its eligibility.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
A Citizens Advisory Group (Sewer) was created by the City Council
of the City of Southlake, by Resolution 78-20 dated 18 July 1978.
The function of the group was to work with the members of the
t Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a study leading to a
recommended sewer plan for the City of Southlake.
1
t
Ib
The following citizens served on this committee:
Harold Knight, chairman
Jim Burger
Leonard Dorsett
Jimmy Turelove
'
Meetings were held the second and fourth Tuesday nights of
each month. The first meeting was held on September 8,1978.
The final meeting was held on March 27,1979.
This report documents the findings and recommendations of the
Citizens Advisory Group regarding sewer plans for the City
'
of Southlake.
3.0 STUDY APPROACH
'
The approach used in conducting the study encompassed the following:
* Regular meetings of the Advisory Group with the Planning
'
and Zoning Commission for coordination and direction.
* Meetings with the Trinity River Authority, Grapevine,
Colleyville, and Westlake, to coordinate Sewer Plans
'
with adjacent cities.
* Evaluation of population trends, densities, and areas of
development.
* Evaluation of the requirements for Sewer by various areas
'
of the city.
* Determination and evaluation of potential approaches.
'
* Determination of rough order of magnitude costs.
4.0 DATA SUMMAIZY
A summary of the pertinent data gathered during the study is as
'
fol lows:
4.1 Cost of Sewer line installation (typical)
A. City of Sanger, Texas Sewer improvement.
Bid Mav 24,1976. (Dollars)
'
8" line 8 to 10 feet deep .............. 4.35
per foo
1 manhole 8 to 10 feet deep .......... 647.00
each
'
Customer Wye or Tee .............. 20.50
lift Sewage station .....3S,S00.00
each
each
B. Duriken FZoad/ Kiest Blvd.
Bid August 4,1978. (Dollars)
8" line 8 to 10 feet deep ............ S.SS
per foo
12" line 8 to 10 feet deep ............ 23.65
per foo
'
4.2 Southlake Population Trends
�,.
2
A. Single Family Residence Building Permit History.
Year
1968 1970
1973
1978
Number of Permits
15 13
18
48
B. Population
Growth History.
Year
1960 1970
1973
1978
Population
1023 2031
2465
3100
C. Population
Growth Projection
Year
1978 1980
1985
1990
TRA Estimate
2600 3300
6525
13700
(1977)
Carroll School
740 831.
1112
(Students)
4.3 Trinity River
Authority (TRA) Data.
TRA presently
provides wastewater
treatment for 15
cities and the
D/FW airport.
Costs for wastewater treatment are prorated to the users
on the basis of wastewater flow.
Wastewater treatment costs (January 1979) were
approximately 40 cents per 1,000 gallons.
TRA is currently expanding their capacity to 100
million gallons per day. Current flow is about SS
million gallons per day.
TRA has the authority to issue water and sewer bonds.
A city with the population density and priority re-
quirements for an EPA sewer grant could expect a
minimum of 5 years to actual construction start from
the time of first application.
To become a member of the TRA, a city must enter into
a contract with TIZA. The other member cities must
approve the conditions of the contract. Some examples
of contract conditions for Southlake might be:
(a) Grapevine Big Bear extension completed.
(b) Colleyville Big Bear extension approved.
(c) Cost sharing and cost recovery agreements for the
Southlake tie on.
A study of the wastewater treatment for the Grapevine,
Colleyville, and Southlake area is documented in a
report prepared for the 'TRA by URS/ Forrest and
Cotton Inc., Consulting Engineers, Dallas Texas ; dated
t
March 1977. In this report interceptor lines are
sized A -or the natural drainage into the Little Bear
and Big Rear Creek drainage basins. Interceptor line
segment construction costs are shown in 1976 dollars.
A TRA interceptor line exists up to the point where
M
11
Big Bear and Little Bear Creek meet about 1.5 miles
north of the highway 183 and highway 360 intersection.
The D/FiV point of entry into the line is on Bear
Creek about 1/2 mile north of highway 183.
4.4 'Grapevine Sewer Plan Data.
Grapevine has two sewage treatment plants. The north
' and east part of the city drain to a facility on
Denton Creek. The west part of the city drains to
an above ground package treatment plant located on
Big Bear Creek about half way between highways 121
and 1S7. The temporary treatment facility is
currently near maximum capacity and the following
has been initiated by Grapevine.
They have just completed a Step 1 EPA grant study for
the extension of the TRA interceptor line up Big
Bear Creek to the temporary facility.
The city is applying for a Step 1 and Step 2 funds;
however, the earliest anticipated operational date
is 1983 if they continue to pursue this approach.
This approach is not compatible with the need date
due to the near capacity condition of the temporary
package treatment facility.
Grapevine is currently conducting an engineering study
' of alternative plans as follows:
(1) Pumping sewage to the Little Bear Interceptor
which is complete across highway 121.
(2) Pumping to the east side facility.
' (3) Installing an additional temporary package
treatment facility.
(4) financing a line themselves from their temporary
' facility to the Bear Creek interceptor.
Data from the study is expected during March 1979.
4.S Colleyville Sewer Plan Data.
Colleyville has an area of 11 square miles which is
' approximately 1/2 the area of Southlake.
They currently have S10 sewer connections serving
about 1/4 of the population. As of September 26,1978
the user charge was a flat rate of $.7.50 per month.
This paid for treatment only and did not include
sewer system bond maintenance. Revenue from their
water system was paying for both water and sewer
bonds. Starting in 1979 the sewer user charge will
be on the basis of a three month average of December,
January and February water consumption.
I.
Colleyville has spent approximately 1.8 million
dollars on sewer as of September 26,1978. They are
'
a member city of TRA and discharge effluent into the
Little Bear Creek Interceptor which is complete to the
north across highway 121.
'
At the present time Colleyville has a Step 1 Grant
which includes a study of sewage requirements for the
entire city. The objective is to determine which
'
areas of the city are eligible for Grant assistance
under the 1972 population rule. New developments
since that date cannot be included in grant money.
'
The study will encompass a cost comparison of a Big
Bear Creek Interceptor extension versus a pumping
station to feed the sewage from the north side
of the city into the Little Bear Interceptor. The
study is scheduled to be complete in October of 1979.
A summary of their current Ordinance regarding sewer
system extension is as follows: Developers put in
their own sewer lines. Colleyville pays the additional
charges for over size lines to take care of area
growth. Developer reinburses Colleyville when they
connect to lines the City has previously installed.
Colleyville charges developers a sewage charge of
$ 275.00 per acre for two houses per acre. This
charge increases for higher densities. Builder
pays $ 100.00 additional per house for sewer. The
tie on fee is $ 400.00 for the first 100 feet and
'
h 4.2.5 per foot for all over 100 feet. If a sewer
line runs within 300 feet of a house it is mandatory
that the house tie into the line.
'
4.6 Westlake Sewer Plan Data
'
The Westlake Ordinance currently requires a minimum
lot size of 2 acres. Any development with lot sizes
less than two acres must provide their own Sewage
Treatment Facility. The Trophy Club currently has a
'
stand,►rd treatment plant and the effluent is used
to water the Golf Course. Their long range plan is
to have the homeowners own and operate their own water
'
and sewage facility via a home owners association.
4.7 Government Grant Money Data
'
The Texas Department of Water Resourses, formerly the
Texas Water Quality Board is responsible for the
administration of portions of Public Law 92-500 which
is known as the Federal Water Polution Law Control
Act of 1972.
'
Public Law 92-500 was modified in 1977 by Program
Requirements Memorandum (PIN) 77-8 and 78-9 and the
Clean Water Act of 1977. The net results of these
modifications make it' very difficult for high growth
rate areas to qualify for grant funds on sewer collection
systems. The criteria established by public law 92-500
with these modifications states in essence that to
qualify for Government assistance the sewer collection
system (house to house collection lines), must be sized
'
so that 2/3 of the capacity would have been generated by
the population existing in October 1972.
'
Until such time as Public Law 92-500 is changed it appears
very unlikely that any significant area of Southlake
could qualify for a sewer collection system grant.
'
Southlake probably could qualify for a government grant
to extend the TRA interceptor from Grapevine or for the
installation of a package treatment plant. Additionally
it could possibly qualify for assistance to install
'
trunk lines for the connection of areas that already have
collector lines installed to the TRA interceptor or to a
package treatment plant. Existing examples of these
areas are the High School and the Summerplace Addition.
Also some of the work that was performed previously
under Government grant money for a Southlake Sewer System
'
Wright be applicable to a new grant.
It may even be possible to enter the 92-500 EPA grant
program at the Step 3 level, provided that Southlake
'
pay the engineering costs for an up -date of the Step 1
Facility Plan and the Step 2 Engineering drawings and
specifications to define a grant qualified program,
(such as the TRA interceptor extension). The Texas
Department of Water Resources suggests that the only
way to determine the exact Southlake eligibility is to
'
initiate application for a grant through them.
4.8 Rough Order Cost Data
'
A. Estimated cost to provide Sewer to all Southlake
water system customers.
Rough order costs for this approach were generated
'
by assuming that sewer lines were installed in
parallel with the existing water line. This would
not be a practical installation for a gravity flow
sewer system dueto the terrain variation. However,
'
if each customer had a pressure pump to force their
sewage into the main line it would be practical. This
type of pressure fed system is currently employed by
several communities. Additionally is was assumed that
a TRA Interceptor line would be available at the
Grapevine plant by 1981. This is probably optimistic;
therefore costs were also generated for a package
'
treatment plant to be located at Pig Bear Creek and
Highway 121. A package treatment plant would be less
costiv than the "'RA interceptor extension; however it
'
would not be a permanent solution due to limited
capacity. This methodology provided a "cost feel"
'
for comparisons.
'
6
(1) Ground Rules for cost estimate.
'
44 miles of sewer line (same as water system)
Sewer System to be installed in 1981.
'
894 water customers in 1981, (projected from 7S0
in 1979)
Sewer System installed cost is $ 15.00 per foot (1979
'
dollars), including manholes and 3 lift.stations.
'
Revenue bond service cost $ 20,000. per year for each
$ 2S0,000. of bonds.
Sewage treatment cost 40c per 1000 gallons, (1979
'
dollars).
Sewage volume = 120 gallons per day per person with
'
an average of 3.4 persons per residence.
The cost of a TRA Interceptor from the Grapevine entry
to Southlake = $ 8S7,400.00 (1979 dollars).
'
The system would be financed by revenue bonds. Bond
servicing and all operations, maintenance, and sewage
treatment costs would be paid by the users. Assume
'
no government grant money is available to the city.
'
The cost of a package treatment plant to handle the
sewage volume of the city is the event of a delay
in the TRA line = $ 200,000 (1979 dollars)
'
Inflation rate at 8% per year.
7
(2) Sewer System Installation Costs with TRA Interceptc
(dollars).
System installation 3,484,800.00
TRA Inte rce>>tor- line 857,400.00
Engineering and legal costs 374,376.00
Total System Costs 4,689,S76.00
Total System Costs S,469,921.00
1979 dollars
1979 dollars
1979 dollars
1979 dollars
1981 dollars
(3) Sewer System Installation Costs with
Package
Plant (dollars)
System installation
31,484,800.00
1979
dollars
Package treatment plant
2005000.00
1979
dollars
Engineering and legal costs 294,794.00
1979
dollars
Total system costs
3,979,S84.00
1979
dollars
Total system costs
4,641,787.00
1981
dollars
7
r
' (4) Required Revenue with TRA
Line Extension
(1981 dollars)
Revenue Bond Service
437,S94.00
per
year
Sewage Treatment Costs
S3,254.00
per
year
System Operation and Mainten-
ance
35,000.00
per
year
Total System Costs
52S,848.00
per
year
Average Cost Per home
49.02
per
month
(5) Required Revenue with Package 'Treatment
Plant
(1981 dollars)
Revenue Bond Service
371,343.00
per
year
System Operation and Mainten-
ance
63,350.00
per
year
Total System Costs
434,693.00
per
year
Average Cost Per Home
40.52
per
month
R. Estimated cost to provide a single trunk line from
Grapevine Lake south along Carroll Avenue to
Big Bear Creek and Highway 121. Sewage Treatment
to be by either TRA interceptor or a temporary
package treatment plant.
(1) Ground rules for cost estimates.
5.15 miles of sewer trunk line
3.4 miles of lift station line.
One lift station cost = $ 4S,300.00 (1979 dollars)
Lift station force main installation = $ 10.00 per
foot (1979 dollars)
Sewer line installation cost =$ 14.00 per foot includ-
ing manholes, (1979 dollars)
General obligation bond services = $ 25,000.00
per- Year for each $ 2S0,000.00 of bonds.
The cost of a TRA interceptor line from the Grapevine
entry to Southlake = $ 857,400.00 (1979 dollars)
The trunk line would be financed by general obliga-
tion bonds and paid for by advalorem taxes. The
operation, maintenance and sewage treatment costs
would be paid by the user. Obtain costs with
and Without government money.
City advalorem tax income for 1979 = $ 134,000.00
The cost of a package treatment plant to handle the
sewage volume of the trunk line in the event of a
delay in the TRA line = $ 100,000.00 (1979 dollars)
Inflation rate is 8% per year.
(2) Trunk Line Installation Costs with
TRA
'
Interceptor (dollars)
Force Main Installation Costs 380,688.00
1979 dollars
Sewer Line Installation 179,520.00
1979 dollars
One Lift Station Installed 45,300.00
1979 dollars
TRA Interceptor Line Costs 857,400.00
1979 dollars
'
Engineering and Legal Costs 117,032.00
Total System Costs 1,579,940.00
1979 dollars
1979 dollars
Total System Costs 1,842,842.00
1981 dollars
'
(3) Trunk Line Installation Costs with
Package
Plant (dollars)
Force Main Installation Costs 380,688.00
1979 dollars
Sewer Line Installation 179,520.00
1979 dollars
One Lift Station Installed 45,300.00
1979 dollars
Package Treatment Plant 100,000.00
1979 dollars
'
Engineering and Legal Costs 56,440.00
1979 dollars
Total System Costs 761,949.00
1979 dollars
Total Svstem Costs 888,736.00
1981 dollars
(4) Required Revenue with TRA Interceptor
(1981
dollars)
No Government
75% Govern -
Assistance
ment Assistanc
Bond Service Per Year 184,284.00
46,071.00
Required Increase in
'
Taxes- percent 118%
29%
(S) Required Revenue with Package Plant
(1981 dollars)
'
No Government
7S% Govern -
Assistance
ment Assistanc
Bond Service Pet- Year 88,873.00
Required. Increase in
22,218.00
Taxes - percent S7 %
14%
4.9 Sewage Disposal Data
A. Standard Septic System
A Standard Septic System consists of a holding tank
a 1i_c;uid tank and a gravity flow irrigation field.
!or most family dwellings approximately ISO feet of
!-1OW Tield later�il line is adequate. There are how-
ever, several ;areas in the City of Southlake where
the soil wit' ^.ot absorb the normal septic system
0.1t!)ut of a `a!ii i ! ,v dwelling even with a much greater
length of flo.. '.geld.
The performance of a marginally acceptable standard
septic system can be improved by carefully rebuilding
r
FJ
the flow field with absorbent material. The
use of a settling pit, the use of trees in the
flow field and the addition of a small aeriation
pump. The average cost to install a standard septic
'
system is approximately $ 1,500.00 (1979). When
properly installed and used a standard septic
system should require very little maintenance
'
throughout its lifetime.
B. Aerobic Home Sewage Treatment System.
'
An aerobic home sewage treatment system is similar
to a standard septic system with differences as
'
follows: It has three tanks, a holding tank, an
aeriation tank and a treated effluent tank. It has
a tinier operated aeriation pump and a float
actuated effluent. Pump. For most family dwellings
the irrigation field consists of approximately
1,000 feet. of 3/4" perforated pipe buried 12 to
18 inclies. The effluent is pumped into the irriga-
tion field which may be in flower gardens, yards,
etc.
The system is attractive for soil conditions that
will not support a standard septic system. The
primary advantage is due to the size of the irrigation
field and the purity of the aeriated effluent. The
' ! average cost to :install an aerobic home sewage
treatment system is approximately $ 3,500.00 per
unit. One unit is capable of handling the effluent
from two homes.
C. Package Sewage Treatment Plants
Above ground portable sewage treatment plants are
available and Provide either an interm or permanent
'
'
solution to sewage treatment for isolated areas
of a city, subdivis.ion,. school, apartment, etc.
The city of Grapevine uses a package treatment
plant fur the area south of highway 121 which
encomi.),isses the high school, apartments, mobil homes
and residences. [n Southlake mini package treat-
'
ment plants are presently used by the high school
{this is a more permanent underground system) and
by the Sumn►erplace Addition. Package plants and
mini package plants use the same treatment process.
"'he nri.mary difference is size. Package plants are
;)ssemMied on site due to size. Mini package plants
are '-livered assembled. The cost for several
s l -e., are as follows:
'
Caoacity gallons Number of Cost installed
per clay homes Served (dollars)
4,000 10 27,000.00
10
Capacity gallons Number of Cost Installed
per day Homes Served (dollars)
405,000 100 72,000.00
'
100,000 250 84,000.00
350,000 850 150,000.00
The size range is from 1,000 gallons per day
to 2,000,000 gallons per day capacity. The above
costs do not include home to the treatment plant.
'
line and installation costs. These are dependent.
on the terrain but should average approximately
$ 4.50 to $ 5.00 per foot.
S.0 ALTERNATES CONSIDERED
The following alternates were considered and evaluated.
S.1 Provide Sewer to the entire city immediately.
EVALUATION
This is not considered practical from a cost
`
stand point. An may be seen in paragraph 4.8
'
the estimated user cost for this approach varies
from about $ 41.00 per month to $ 49.00, dependent
upon the use of a package treatment plant or the
extension of the TRA interceptor line. This
high cost is primarily due to the low population
density of the city. Additionally the low
'
population density does not allow the city to
qualify for government grant money to share
in the cost. See paragraph 4.7 for a discussion
of grant money.
S.2 Use !Mini Package Treatment Plants for Subdivisions.
Provide a city ordinance to establish guidelines for
±,±iram ni. tetent plants for subdivisions. Developers
The
to pav for the complete installation. city
to operate maintain, and collect sewage charges
�T'O!±) tiaC' USCT's. the long range plan would
he to tie the subdivision to a main trunk line
leading to a central treatment plant or to the
L1,' ,IJAT ION
Tliis approach is already being used at the
S_,m±;iern_ lace Addition. 'There is no immediate cost
to the city. When the population density increases
so that it becomes cost effective, application
could he made for a government grant for cost
' sharing to install a trunk line and central
treatment plant or an extension of the TRA
interceptor. 11
5.3 Let the developer provide the trunk lines. This
P
approach is the same as alternate S.2 above
'
except for the provisions of an additional city
ordinance to provide guidelines for the developer
to run trunk lines to the TRA Interceptor along
Big Bear Creek when it becomes available or to
'
a city provided package treatment plant at Big
Bear Creek.
'
EVALUTA I ON
This could be an acceptable alternate to the
'
City -Government financed trunk lines of alternate
S.21 above. It might he the only acceptable
approach should a large development need sewer
before the population density would justify a
city or a city -government financed trunk line.
5.4 Provide a "Spine" Trunk Line.
'
Provide a trunk line through the center of the
city to which developers and major population
areas could tie. Run the trunk line to either
a TRA Interceptor extension or to a package
treatment plant. For study purposes assume
the line would run primarily along Carroll Avenue
and pick up Dove Estates, Quail Creek, Schools,
Churches and Businesses and residences along the
way to Big Bear Creek.
'
EVALUATI ON
i
This is not considered pratical from a cost
stand point as may be seen in paragraph 4.7. The
estimated increase in taxes with no government
a:;sistance to pay for this installation vary from
S7°, to 11,9") dependant upon the use of a package
treatment plant or, an extension of the TRA
interceptor l ine_ 'Phis approach begins to look
acceptaikle with a 75„ government grant with tax
increases of 57. and 14% respectively and should
he included in future studies as the population
density increases.
S.S Join the Trinity River Authority (TIZA) Now.
rjecom<, a memhc r• city of the TRA now in order to
stay abreast of and be a part of developments
leading to an interceptor line up Big Bear Creek
to Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville.
►. VA!.l1ATION
Action should be initiated immediately to become
a member city. Ultimately the TRA will serve
12
the whole of Northeast Tarrant County, and.
Southlake is a significant part of this area.
Je The conditions of membership are explained more
fully in paragraph 4.1.
' S.6 Design the Southlake Sewer System for hater
Conservation.
Design the system to use the treated waste water
' for irrigation of recreation areas and/or food
production.
'
EVALUATION
This is an excellent objective for this day and
time. Such a system could be brought into being
'
at any time during the City Sewer System Develop-
ment by any individual or group that can demonstrate
significant benefits to the residents of Southlake.
'
The cost effectiveness of such a proposal is
highly dependent upon good engineering and good
consistent systems management. The planning and
'
zoning; commission should be alert to any develop-
ment that might use the effluent from a mini
treatment plant for water conservation.
'
S.7 Use An.Optimum Mixture of Sewage Treatment Systems.
Use the best combination of approaches for each
situation as the city developes.
EVALUATION
This should be an integral part of any plan.
Many of the standard septic systems now in use
'
on one acre or greater lots should never need to
be replaced. The aerobic septic system should
probably be considered an interim system in
most cases. Any high density housing, businesses,
'
or industry will need either'a mini system, a
Package treatment plant or a tie in to the TRA
interceptor. The hest mix of these systems will
'
vary with population density, time and the growth
pattern of the city.
'
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions reached by the Citizens Advisory Group (Sewer),
'
as a result of t!ie 7 month study are as follows:
6.1 SUIIthlakc is not eligible for government grant
111orey to help with sewer collection systems (house
'
to 'louse sewer collection lines) because the
city has no significant population concentration
that meets the October 1972 requirements. See
'
paragraph 4.7 for a more detailed discussion
of government grant requirements.
1 13
6.2 Southlake may be eligible for government grant
money to help with trunk lines, package
treatment plant, and/or TRA interceptor line
' extension. Application for a grant must be
initiated to determine the eligibility.
' 6.3 The cost to provide sewer to the entire city at
this time without grant money was estimated to
be approximately $ 40.00 to $ 50.00 per month per
home served. The primary factor that causes this
' high cost is the current low average population
density of .20 persons per acre.
6.4
Existing areas of the city presently needing some
'
form of active sewage treatment are areas of high
density housing and/or areas where a standard
(passive) septic system does not perform well due
to soil conditions. Some problem areas also
exist due to improperly installed standard septic
systems.
'
6.S
The problem of existing improperly installed
standard septic systems could be resolved in
many cases by making good septic system
'
installation :information available to the
population.
6.6
Existing low density areas where the soil conditions
preclude the use of a standard septic system
can he resolved by the use of an aerobic septic
'
system as described in paragraph 4.9- B
6.7
Existing problems with high density housing on
standard septic systems in poor soil absorbition
areas could be resolved individually by the use of
an aerobic septic system (installation cost
approximately $ 3,500.00) or by the formation of a
'
homeowners association to install a mini treat-
ment plant. ,1 plant to handle 10 homes can be
instal?ed for approximately $ 27,000.00. a plant
to handle 100 homes can be installed for approximate-
ly S 72,000.00. Lines to connect the homes to the
mini treatment plant would be an additional cost.
nr.rantiements could he made with the city to operate
'
anel maintain the system.
6.8
FutLurc� areas that will need some form of active
se►,ivo treatment are scattered groups of high
'
density hOLls111g, commercial, and industrial areas
ane'_ low density cases where the soil has poor
'! )so-htion characteristics..
6.9
the most practical approach to providing active
l
sc,wa(,e treatment for future high density scattered
'
groups is with the use of a mini treatment plant
14
for each group. The long range plan could be
to replace these mini treatment plants with an
interconnecting sewer trunk line leading to a
central package treatment plant or to an extension
of the TRA interceptor line. The trunk line
installation could be timed to occur when the
population density has increased to the level
required to make it attractive from a cost
standpoint. The cost to install the mini treatment
plants in high density areas are competative with
'
the costs to inst.rll septic system; therefore
developers could pay for the installation.
The city could assume the responsibility for the
'
operation and maintenance of each mini system to
insure consistent proper operation and charge the
user each month (home owner or business) on the
'
basis of water usage for the month of January
or February of each year. When the trunk line
is installed the mini plant could be given back
'
to the developer for re -use or re -sale. The
funding for the trunk line and a package
•treatment plant or TRA interceptor line extension
could be by revenue or general obligation bonds
and assisted by a government grant if the city
can qualify.
6.10
Future areas of low density where the soil has
poor absorbtion characteristics can continue to
be resolved by the use of an aerobic septic
system until such time as the population density
'
increases to the point to justify a city wide
sewer system.
'
6.11
1-uture areas of low density (1 acre or greater
lot size) where the soil has good absorbtion
c)aracteristics can continue to be served by standarc
'
ti�htic systems. The long range plan should give
-he areas an opportunity to tie on when a trunk
line passes within a practical tie on distance.
6.12
The neighboring cities of Grapevine and Colleyville
hatre continuing sewer system requirement problems
as does Southlake. Southlake should work closely
with both cities to insure the maximum of
e}fort be brouOht to bear on this mutual problem.
'
6.13
The TRA interceptor line extension is the most
attractive long range solution for waste water
treatment for Southlake. Southlake should stay
abreast.- of all plans for the extension of the
'
TRA interceptor up Big Bear Creek to the City
boundry. The earliest expected date for the
completion of the TRA interceptor to Southlake
assuming Grapevine and Colleyville both elect to
Pursue their efforts for the extension is 1983 to 1985.
r
OUTII KE SEWER PLAN
S LA .
RIiCOMM ENDAT[ONS
' PLANNING AND 70NING COMMISSION
C1'1'IZFNS ADVISORY GROUP (SEWER)
h�
U
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations are presented in three groups. The first group
concerns the approach to be taken to provide a sewer for Southlake.
The second group deals with the resolution of currant standard septic
systems. 7'he third group addresses follow up to this study.
7.1 Recommended Sewer Ilan.
A. Subdivisions, (housing, commercial and industrial), where
lot sizes are less than 1 acre or greater than 1 acrQ with
soil that will not pass a perculation test. -The subdivision
approval requirements should be modified to include line
sizes, sewer line routing and a mini sewer treatment plant
size and location. 'rhese items and customer tie on provisions
to be installed at the land developers expense. The city to
be responsible 1'or the operation, maintenance and the collection
of stowage charges from the users. All land area under
Consideration for a-stanclard septic system should be exclusive
of lan(! under the 100 year flood plain and existing water
Covered or water course areas. Additional considerations for
subdivision are as follows:
The City should maintain a long range plan that shows how
each subdivision can be tied into a trunk line leading to
a cent r•;,I treatment .)I ant or the TRA interceptor. A fee
to be est;.ibl ished per acre should be collected from the
land developer for the (:ity to prepare and to maintain
this plai►. iml)leutent.ttioir of the long range plan to be
initi,jted when a central treatment plant or TRA inter-
ceptor extension heCO IirCS cost effective.
The mini -treatment plant and l;lnd shall be dedicated and
remain the property of the city for its use or disposal
wl-ren the long range )!all has been fulfilled for the area
it serves.
The subc.iivision approval requirements should also be
modified to provide guidelines fur the developers to run
trunk lines to the 'rRA interceptor at Big Bear Creek when
it becomes avai•.ahle, or to a city provided package
treatment pla!j*. ;It Mg Bear Creek or to another trunk line.
,rhese gLridel is1CS ,'could include criteria for oversizing
the trunk Linn,, for future flow requirements and a
rcin-hur•sement hol icv to the developer as other- parties tie
into the line.' liacih case of this type will be engineered
at the developers expense, to determine the feasibility of
this option.
n�•
'.!
B.
Commercial and Industrial Areas - An ordinance covering'
sewage disposal for Commercial and Industrial areas should
be generated. The selection of the particular system for
each case would he dependant upon the amount and type of
sewage, the area available for lateral lines(exclusive of
flood plain and water course areas), the soil conditions
'
and the existance and proximity of sewage treatment facilities
at that time.
' C..
Low density hOusing where the lot sizes are 1 acre or greater
in size exclusive of flood plain and water course areas and
the soil has good ahsorption characteristics.- The use of
standard septic SyStenlS should continue to be acceptable.
The long range plan Should allow these areas an opportunity
to tie on when a trunk line passed within a practical tic
on distance. PI-ovi s i ons for mandatory tie oil are not
'
recommended. iiowever, where new construction property borders
an existing line, it shall be tied on where economically
feasible.
'
System Problems.
7.2
Resolution of Current Septic
It is recommended that the City take an active part in
'
assisting home owners where there are problems with
standard Septic systems, due to poor soil conditions or
improper installations. This help to be provided as
follows:
Provide the home owners with data on good septic system
installation i.nformatioil. In many cases the blow field
can he rebuilt with absorbent materials, a settling pit
can be added, trees can he used and a small acriat:ion
pill►lp can be added to provide satisfactory operation.
'
Also provide the home owners with information on acriation
sewer systems that will perform regardless of soil condition.
Suet I'aras;raph 1.51-1i for more details. Minimum permit
'
fee and free i►ispection for corrective action to existing
systems is recommended.
1
i
7.3 Sewer System Study follow l)p.
It is recommended that a permanent Citizens Advisory
Groeip (Sewer), he established by the City Council with
members appointed annually by the council. This group
Should report to and advise the Planning and Zoning
(:ommissio;l, Additionally the first assignment of this
ti�roup would be to monitor and assist in implementation
o!- the ahove recommendet ions. I
8.0 Near Term Action ltedu i red .
The initiation of action on the following items will
serve to put the city and the, citizens in a position to
make knowledgable decisions relative to sewer
questions.
8.1
Initiate action to become a member city of the Trinity
River Authority (T1tA).
8.2
Create a file of hand out data for the citizens of
Southlake on the following subjects:
'
(A) Improving the performance of standard septic systems.
(li) Aerobic Septic Svstcnls - data and costs.
(C) Mini 'Creatnhellt pl.uhts - data and costs.
8.3
Stay abreast of the Go-anevine, Colleyville, TWX action on
the interceptor extension.
8.4
Initiate action oil the l:itV Ordinances as defined in
ions.
paragraph % . 1 o ! the t-e* ommendat
r
-.A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION
May 8,1986
7 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Discussion: Administrative Issues of the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Wednesday, May 7,1986 at 10 a.m.
v
City Secretary
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
May 13, 1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Oath of Office. Planning and Zoning Commission.
2. ZA 86-12 Final plat approval of Brittany Place.
Location: North Peytonville and South of
Dove Road West.
Owner: Thomas H. Brittann, Jr.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-19 Preliminary Plat of Massey Addition, Replat
Tracts 5 & SU, making Lots 1 & 2, Block A.
Location: North on Raintree Road.
Owner: W.C. Massey.
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-21 Zoning request for Tract 4A1 of the R.D.
Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207. Current
zoning is Agricultural, request is for Heavy
Commercial.
Owner: International Business Machine Corp.
Location: North White Chapel Road and North
of Sweet Street.
Public Hearing.
S. ZA 86-23 Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale
of Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Owner: Chevron USA, Inc.(formerly Gulf Oil Corp.)
and T.M.M., Inc.
Location: Corner of S.H. 114 and 1709.
Public Hearing.
' 6. ZA 86-28
Preliminary Plat approval for Carmel Bay.
Located in Southlake Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
Owner: Dan Howell.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
' Texas, on Friday, May 9, 1986 at 4 p.m.
' stySecretary
'
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
C''
o
H
o
z
Cn
drzn
o
O
z
Y
v
t�
C
d
>
a
z
C
CDDATE:
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
May 13,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Jim Vorhis,
'
Carroll McDaniel, Ed Norman and Martin
Dunbar.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Eddie Cheatham.
COUNCILPERSONS: Charles Curry.
loner
The Minutes of the April 22, Planning
x
and Zoning Commission meeting were
approved as presented.
lheselm
rman
Vorhis
x
x
X
Bill Stoner ask to have bottom of
niel
x
x
page 2 modified in the minutes, as
bar
Cheatham will not be able to accomplis
the task without the approval of the
hose not vot
ng vere
not
sworn
Mayor.
n as commiss
oneis
a
this
time.
Mayor Lloyd 0. Latta Jr. was present
'
and gave the oath of office to the
new P & Z Members. Bill Stoner (sworn
in for another 3 year term), Gary
Fickes, Martin Dunbar and Rick
'
Wilhelm.
Mayor Latta also announced that Charle
'
Curry is now the Liaison Officer to
the P & Z and that he will be working
closly with them.
Stoner addressed several administrativ
items for the commission.
'
ZA 86�12. The final plat of Brittany
Place Addition was discussed. Owner,
Dr. Tom Brittain was present and answer
d
questions for the commission.
Brittain stated he talked to property
owners concerning off -site drainage.
'
Junkers would sign a statement, but
have no problem with the addition.
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
t7
r'
M
0
H
0
z
tTJ
n
0z
e
31<
o
-3
0
z
�
n
tt
ti
� o
d rn
C)
a
z
y
oy
d
o
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: May 13,1986
TIME: pp
:
PLACE: CITY OFSOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
2
The Cheatham letter of May 13 was
discussed. Brittain agreed to share
in the cost of the water line on
'
Peytonville.
'
Domonic Carlucci of 1988 Peytonville
Avenue was present and stated he had
severe drainage problems but had no
problems with the subdivision.
'Stoner
x
Fickes
x
Motion was made and approved to
Wilhelm
x
x
recommend approval of the final plat.
x
x
'Norman
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
nbar
x
ZA 86-19. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-19
Massey Addition/replat was discussed.
The property which consists of Tracts
'
5 $ 5U of the Samuel Freeman Survey
is zoned A-`3.Single Family District.
Mr. W.C. Massey was present and
'
answered questions. There were no
comments during the public hearing.
'
Ed Norman stated that other lots in
the Raintree Addition were split
leaving slightly less than 1 acre
in each lot.
Stoner
x
Fickes
x
x
After discussion, motion was made
x
and approved to approve the prelimin-
rWilhelm
Norman
x
x
ary plat.
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
' Dunbar
x
Martin Dunbar stepped down for the
next item having a vested interest.
(statement attached to minutes)
'
ZA 86-21. Zoning request for Tract
ZA 86-21
4A1 of the R.D. Price Survey, Abstrac
'
1207 was considered for Heavy
Commercial Zoning. Current zoning is
Agricultural.
'
Mr. Greg Packker from I.B.M. was
'
'
E OF
I1MISSIONER
`?,'
e
tv,
o
H
0
z
cn
n
d
7
o
z
�
Cn
d
C
�
d
>
v
z
Cf)
C
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: May 13,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
present and answered questions for
the public. Ed Walts was also present.
'
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
toner
x
After discussion, motion was made
ickes
x
and approved to recommend approval
ilhelm
x
of the zoning request to Heavy
orman
x
x
Commercial.
orhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
unbar
x
ZA 86-23. The request for Special
ZA 86-33
Use Permit for the Sale of Off -Premise
Packaged Beer was discussed.
Steven Ginsberg was present represent-
ing Chevron USA,Inc. formerly Gulf Oil
'
Corporation and T.M.M. Inc.
It was noted that the property is
'
currently zoned Heavy Commercial.
It was established that proper notice
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per
'
ordinances. One reply was received,
in favor of the request.
'
No comments were received during the
public hearing.
'
Mr. Wilhelm stated that he requests
that whatever action is necessary to
post no -parking signs along SH114 and
FM1709 be taken.
toner
x
Motion was made to approve the
Fickes
x
x
request for Special Use Permit for
lilhelm
x
Off- Premises Packaged Beer.
orman
x
x
-his
x
x
lc.Daniel
unbar
x
Bill Stoner stepped down for the next
'
agenda item as having a vested interes
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
tzl
M
x
o
H
z
cn
n
z
o
z
a
W
y
z
d
o
-3
d
a
a
z
y
-el
o
q
d
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: May 13,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
4
in the item.
'
ZA 86-28. The preliminary plat for
ZA 86-28
the Carmel Bay Addition was discussed.
The property is located in the cities
extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Owner, Dan Howell was present for the
meeting and answered questions. John
'
Moore also spoke for the owner and
answered questions. Moore indicated
they do plan to request annexation
of the land.
There were no comments during
the public hearing.
Pner
x
ckes
x
Motion was made and approved to
x
recommend approval to the city council.
(ilhelm
orman
x
x
orhis
x
McDaniel
x
unbar
x
x
The meeting was adjourned as no
further business was presented.
1
Res ectfully submitted
J, � Lvt/--/ ttcAaretr�erti
�
Sandra L. LeGrand :�� 3�TFI(4
S '.
City Secretary
*'*
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CCUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
'State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Wi,LlIA,,.,
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath State that he has an
interest, as dd blow, in Agenda Item No. of the - ,00#A.,v /_3
1984, es _rle
Agenda, as described below, and that he
'is executing this Affidavit of Interest and shall refrain from any
vote or decision thereon, all as required by Article 988b, Texas
Civil Statutes Annotated:
Agenda Item:./ Ll,l�t /.vA.�Y _J�L4-.r_ . CA4*,EL. e4,
i -
' Interest Disclosed: 4-6FiU7_4,'v,0 04Xe C 'SrdA*71Z.
' GIVE UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL
_ . 19'9"
Signat re of Elected or Appointed
City Official of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
F OFFICE this the _ ...- _ /3 _ - day of
L / .
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89
Filed with me, this the _ _.day of at
o'clock p.m.
1
City Secretary, City of Southlake
I,]
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CGUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared ,� ,e7-,r,�_ ,t4eLl/�,
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath State that he has an
interest, as described below, in Agenda Item No./-/- of the
198�, City Council Agenda, as described below, and that he
'is executing this Affidavit of Interest and shall refrain from any
vote or decision thereon, all as required by Article 988b, Texas
Civil Statutes Annotated:
Agenda Item:._ _ 2.-
�-04e,c-s7— Z .. 72Z4G,7-
. �. /�i�c f E - -�� •2y,� �,S .z'l��t t�- .. ,� o..- 12 6-7 . - ..
Interest Disclosed:_ - 6u
' GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND
1
11
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
Signature of Elected or Appointed
City Official of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
S1A�2F OFFICE this the _ .. __,/ day of
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
2-4-89
Filed with me, this the of - .. , 19�� at
o'clock p.m.
74� 4 XA- Le��_
City Secretary, City of Southlake
OATH OF OFFICE
1
' STATE OF TEXAS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT:
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE:
' I, Martin W. Dunbar, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully
execute the duties as a member of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
of the City of Southlake, Texas, and will to the best of my ability
' preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and Laws of the
United States and of this city; and I furthermore do solemnly swear
tthat I have not directly, or indirectly paid, offered, or promised
to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, or
' valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a
reward to this appointment.
Martin W. Dunbar
I
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, this the 13th day of May, 1986.
IATTEST:
'4'/' 14,
ity Secretary
Ll
OATH OF OFFICE
1 STATE OF TEXAS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT:
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE:
i
1 I, Richard Wilhelm, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully
execute the duties as a member of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
of the City of Southlake, Texas, and will to the best of my ability
preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and Laws of the
United States and of this city; and I furthermore do solemnly swear
1 that I have not directly, or indirectly paid, offered, or promised
to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, or
1 valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a
reward to this appointment.
N
i
Rychatd Wilhele
1
1 SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, this the 13th day of May, 1986.
1 ATTEST:
i4X'ht W/
1 i y Secretary
0ATI1 OF Ui I,ICI:
STATE OF TENAS :
COV!tiTY OF TARRANT:
CITY OF SOLTHLAKE:
1, William F. Stoner do solemnly swear that I will faithfully
execute the duties as a member of the PLANNING AND ZONING COSl"'ISSIO:�,
of the City of Southlake, Texas, and will to the best of my ability
' preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and Laws -of the
United States and of this city; and I furthermore do solemnly swear
' that I have not directly, or indirectly paid, offered, or promised
to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, or
' valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a
reward to this appointment.
Lk�
ti
ISWOEN TO A:\D SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, this the 13th day of b:ay, 1986.
IATTEST:
1
-11
' C31y 5��rct.>>y
i
r
OATH OF OFFICE
' STATE OF TEXAS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT:
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE:
' I, Gary Fickes, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully
execute the duties as a member of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
of the City of Southlake, Texas, and will to the best of my ability
preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and Laws of the
United States and of this city; and I furthermore do solemnly swear
that I have not directly, or indirectly paid, offered, or promised
to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, or
t valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a
reward to this appointment.
Gary F ckes
ISWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, this the 13th day of May, 1986.
' Mayor
ATTEST:
t
' y Secretary
n
1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
1 May 27, 1986
1 WORKSESSION 7:00 p.m.
1 REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
1 AGENDA
1. Discussion:.
2. Discussion:
3. ZA 83-21
Sub-Categoriesfor the New Zoning Ordinance.
Flood Plain Development.
Gift of Love. F.L. Bailey_
1 4. ZA 86-24 Replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Gorbutt Addition,
making Lots 2A and 2B, Block 1.
C Location: East of Carroll Avenue on F.M. 1709.
Owner: Dan Ticer.
Public Hearing.
1 S. ZA 86-26 Zoning request for Tract 2C2A of the O.W. Knight
Survey, Abstract No. 899. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for A-2 Single Family...
Location: East of Pine on Lilac Lane. .
1
6. ZA 86-30 Zoning request for Tract 11C of the T. M. Hood
1 Survey, Abstract No. 706. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for A-2 Single Family.
Location: North on Peytonville Avenue and East
of Cross Timber Hills Estates.
1 .
1
I hareby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
1 bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue,.Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, May 23, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
E OF
MISSIONER
'
v
r�
`n
a
-3
o
z
m
n
o
d
d
o3
o
z
tr
cn
y
Z
t7
O
-_3
d
>
y
czn
o
y
d
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TLXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: May 27, 1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: CHAIRPERSON;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fiches, Rick Wilhelm, Jim Vorhis,
Carroll McDaniel, Ed Norman and Martin
'
Dunbar.
tCheatham
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bill LeGrand, Eddie
and Scott Dyer.
The Minutes of the May 13, Planning and
'
Zoning Commission meeting were approved
as corrected.
'
Bill Stoner suggested members study and
review new Zoning Ordinance and at the
next Planning and Zoning Meeting would
hold a Public Hearing.
Stoner addressed several items for the
commission on flood plain development
to be discussed at next meeting.
Saner
x
ZA 83-21. Gift of Love, F.L. Bailey.
ZA 83-21
Fickes
x
x
Denied on June 21, 1983 due to improper
W' helm
x
plat. John Levitt, Engineer presented
N man
x
a new plat explaining the one existing
Vorhis
x
structure on 2 acres would meet side $
M aniel
x
x
rear yard requirements for zoning of A-2
D bar
x
Single Family.
Motion was made and approved, contigent
upon 17' R.O.W. dedication on Peytonvill
.
'
ZA 86-24. The Preliminary Plat of Lot 2
ZA 86-24
of the Gorbutt Addition was discussed.
Stoner
x
Dan Ticer owner explain the replating wa
Fakes
x
x
to put existing building as Lot 2A and
W helm
x
x
leave 2B for future development.
Norman
x
Mr. Ticer & Bob Miron (owner of adjacent
V his
x
Miron Subdivision property) plan to
M�aniel
x
build a road between their properties.
Du r
x
Motion was made by Rick Wilhelm to
approve Lot 2A subject to front and side
'
set backs, approve Lot 2B subject to an
additional 30 dedication and 30' set
back line.
'
A OF
ofISSIONER
r-
+
C
M
«-j
0
H
0
z
n
d
d
0
--1
0
z
Y
to
Lnn
y
H
c�
0
d
s�
z
Ln
0
-3
d
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING CON5i]SS10N MEETING.
DATE: May 27, 1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
ZA 86-26. Zoning request for Tract 2C2A
ZA 86-26
Stoner
x
of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
F' kes
x
x
899 was considered for A-2 Single Family
W helm
x
x
Zoning. Current zoning is Agricultural.
N man
x
Vorhis
x
No one was available to represent the
M(yaniel
x
case. Ralph Turly questioned definition
DjWbar
x
of A-2, and had no further comment.
Motion was made to approve zoning from
'
Agricultural to A-2 Single Family.
Za 86-30. Zoning request for Tract 11C
ZA 86-30
'
of the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No.
Stoner
x
706 was considered for A-2 Single Family
F' s
x
Zoning. Current zoning is Agricultural.
W lm
x
N man
x
John Levitt represented F.L. Bailey owne
Vorhis
x
x
of the property.
M aniel
x
x
Due to clerical error notices were not
D bar
x
sent to property owners within 2001.
Bill Stoner said the commission would
vote and approval would be pending City
'
Attorney's legal opinion of this
procedure.
Motion was made to approve zoning reques
.
The meeting was adjourned by Bill Stoner,
t
'
Respectfully submitted
'
Dorothy Woods
Zoning Clerk
I
L
1
F
r
' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
June 10, 1986
' WORKSESSION 7:00 p.m.
IREGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-32 Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer.
' Owner: James Martin
Location: Jellico Circle corner of F.M. 1709 and
Davis Boulevard.
' Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-33 Zoning request for Tract 3 of the A.H. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. 299. Current zoning is
' Agricultural, request is for Light Commercial.
Owner: Richard A. Gump, Jr.
Location: South Carroll and Primrose Lane.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-34 Zoning request for Tract 3A1 of the L.A. Chivers
' Survey, Abstract No. 300. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for Light Industrial.
Owner: Richard A. Gump, Jr.
Location: East of White Chapel Road and East on
' State Highway 114.
Public Hearing.
' 4. ZA 86-14 Final plat approval of Peytonville Place.
Location: North Peytonville and East of Shadow
Creek Estates.
' Owner: Edmund Dotson.
Public Hearing.
S. Discussion: Preliminary Draft of New Zoning Ordinance.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
' bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, June 6, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
1
'
'
I ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
h'
0
0
z
n
dZ
0
0
z
y
rillt�
e
>
a
Z
e
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 10,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS
PRESENT: Chairperson; Bill Stoner,
'
Vice -Chairperson; Gary Fickes. Ed
Norman, Richard Wilhelm, Jim Vorhis.
'
MEMBERS ABSENT: Carroll McDaniel and
Martin Dunbar.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Publi
Works; Bill LeGrand, City Engineer;
Eddie Cheatham and Scott Dyer.
'
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Charles Curry
and Rick Stacy.
A worksession was held prior to the
meeting to discuss the proposed
Zoning Ordinance.
1
The meeting was called to order by
chairperson, Bill Stoner.
The Minutes of the May 27,1986, Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission meeting
were approved as presented.
ZA 86-32. The request for Special
ZA 86-32
Use Permit for the Sale of Off Premise
Packaged Beer was tabled at the
request of Mr. and Mrs. Jim Martin,
'
until the June 24, P $ Z meeting.
ZA 86-33. The zoning request for
ZA 86-33
Tract 3 of the A.H. Chivers Survey,
'
Abstract 299 was considered for
Light Commercial Zoning District.
The 100 acres of land is currently
zoned Agricultural.
Owner, Richard A. Gump Jr. was present
and made a presentation.
It was established that proper notice
was given and property owners within
'
200' were sent.
ME OF
MMISSIONER
0
0
z
n
dZ
0
-3
CDy
z
y
t�
o�
0
>
H
z
oy
0
0
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 10,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
One reply was received, opposing
the request.
'
During the public hearing, the follow-
ing spoke:
Aloha Payne- opposed. Concerned over
drainage, traffic and sewerage.
'
Phillip Bressinck- questions.
Wade Booker- feels it should be
residential land.
'
Ann Barnes- opposed.
Harold Knight opposed.
Robert Messina- opposed.
'
Joe Bentley- opposed
Stoner
x
The property is located in the "B"
0 Fickes
x
x
Noise Cone.
Wilhelm
x
After discussion, motion was made
Norman
x
and approved to deny on the basis
Vorhis
x
x
of lack of adequate access to the
land.
'
ZA 86-34. The zoning request for
ZA 86-34
TR 3A1 of the L.A. Chivers Survey,
Abstract No. 300, was considered for
'
Light Industrial Zoning District.
Owner, Richard A. Gump Jr. was present
and made a presentation. Chuck
Alexander of Cardinal Industrial was
also present and gave a presentation.
He is the proposed user.
He indicated that a 300,000 square fool
plant is proposed for the land.
Alexander gave a history of Cardinal
'
Homes and Modular Homes.
He indicated all Modular Housing
must meet the Uniform Building Codes.
If approved, he stated the plant will
be operational by September 1987,
and it will be the Southwest Regional
Plant.
'
A film was shown, describing the
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
e
0
9
0
z
n
o
d
0
a
0
z
(n
y
m
t7
0
d
>
a
z
CD
CDDATE:
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
June 10,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
plant operation. The ingress -egress
'
will all be from Highway 114 and that
the building will cover approximately
12% of the land and will employee
approximately S00 persons, all from
the Southlake area.
It was noted that the business is
clean, with no dust or smoke and
'
will be all inside storage.
'
It was established that proper notice
has been given and property owners
within 200' feet were notified. Seven
notices were sent and three replies
were received, all in favor.
Public Hearing:
'
Rod Castleberry- Questions.
Joe Bentley- opposed as he feels it
is not the best use of the land.
'
Letty Schantz- comments.
Harold Knight- in favor if the city
can control the site plan.
Buz Brightbill- opposed- traffic on
'
Highway 114 a concern. Is it the best
use of the land?
' Stoner
x
After discussion, motion was made
Fickes
x
and approved to recommend approval
Wilhelm
x
x
of the zoning change to Light Industria
'Norman
x
x
Zoning.
Vorhis
x
ZA 86-14
ZA 86-14. The final plat of Peytonvill
'
Place Addition was discussed, as was
the Cheatham review letter.
Owner, Ed Dotson was present and
answered Questions for the commission.
It was established that he has met
the requirements as listed in the
Cheatham letter.
'
Motion was made to accept the replat
subject to verification of the necessit
'
�1E OF
1MISSIONER
d
m
z
n
-�
o
z
c�i�
z
t7
-tea
d
>
~
a
In
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 10,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4 INDEX
Stoner
Fickes
x
x
of a 7.5' utility easement on the
x
x
north boundry line of the plat.
tWilhelm
Norman
x
x
City Engineer is to check into this.
Vorhis
x
'
A discussion was held in regards
to the preliminary draft of the new
Zoning Ordinance.
The meeting was adjourned, as their
were no further agenda items.
'
Res ectfully Submitted.,,!' ....... R"°''��.,
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary:
\
1
27119 119 -133
0 .
6/
6
'3
��_ ��� .
�o� � � ��� �� �� .
��%-�c�
���
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
June 24, 1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-32 Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Owner: James Martin
Location: Jellico Corner, corner of F.M. 1709 and
Davis Boulevard.
Public Hearing.
2. Consider Preliminary Draft of New Zoning Ordinance.
3. ZA 86-36 Zoning request for Tract 4A1 of the John A. Freeman
Survey, Abstract No. 529. Current zoning is Argicultural,
request is for Light Industrial.
Owner: James Turner.
Location: South Kimball Road.
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-37 Zoning request for Tract 6H of the John A. Freeman
Survey, Abstract No. 529. Current zoning is Agricultural,
request is for Light Industrial.
Owner: James Turner.
Location: South Kimball Road.
Public Hearing.
5. ZA 86-19 Final Plat approval for Massey Addition.
Location: North on Raintree.
Owner: W.C. Massey.
Public Hearing.
6. ZA 86-28 Final Plat approval for Carmel Bay Estates.
Location: North on Burney Lane.
Owner: Dan Howell.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, June 20, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
r �
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
tSouthlake, Texas
SUPPLEMENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
' June 24,1986
7:30 p.m.
' 7. ZA 86-31. Preliminary Plat of the Forest Ridge Addition.
A 16.7 acre tract of land out of the T.M. Hood
' Survey, Abstract 706.
Location: North Peytonville Avenue.
Owner. Unique Incorporated.
Public Hearing.
7
' I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Saturday, June 21,1986 at 10:30 a.m. A'it
//"/L _.2�j
ity Secretary
i
\' J
'
NAME OF
IMMISSIONER
d
z
M
0
�
z
n
z
o
z
D
Cn�-3
a
z
d
<
d
a
a
z
<
o__3
d
-�
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 24,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
'
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and
Martin Dunbar.
'
COUNCILPERSON: Charles Curry.
STAFF: Director of Publio Works;
'
Bill LeGrand, City Planner; T'4ixe
Monroe and City Engineer; Scott Dyer.
The meeting was called to order by
'
Bill Stoner.
Stoner
x
The Minutes of the June 10, Planning
0ckes
1helm
x
x
x
and Zoning Commission meeting were
approved as corrected.
Norman
x
rhis
x
x
Daniel
f
x
nbar
x
ZA 86-32. The request for Special
ZA 86-32
Use Permit for the Sale of Off -Premise
'
Packaged Beer for the convenience
store which is to be built in Jellico
'
Corner Center was discussed.
Mrs. Jim Martin was present and
answered questions for the commission.
'
It was established that proper notice
was given and property owners within
200' were notified.
During the public hearing, the follow-
ing spoke:
'
Billy Jon Curb - opposed
John Newberry- in favor
Pamula Muller - in favor
toner
x
Motion was made to recommend approval
Ickes
10
x
x
to the city council.
lhelm
x
orman
x
x
rhis
x
McDaniel
x
unbar
x
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
d
a
x
0
z
rri n
z
d
rn
o
z
Cn
v
z
d
�
u
D
z
d
"r
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 24,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
2
tThe
preliminary draft of the new
Zoning Ordinance was discussed.
'
Jim Wooll stated he feels the buffer -
yards section of the ordinance lacks
definition.
'
Pamula Muller- she feels the buffer
yard section is not restrictive enough
as it mentions Light Industrial
'
against Residential. Change H to K.
The commission agrees the following
'
recommended changes should be
considered:
1. Avigation easements should be
added to the plat.
2. Delete demensions so that every-
thing fits on main building line.
3. Change buffer yards from H to K
for industrial vs. residential.
'
4. 14-2 governing provisions.
S. Signs. 14-1d. 2'X3' city put
'
up the signs.
Stoner
x
Motion was made to recommend approval
Fickes
of the zoning ordinance with the
ilhelm
x
x
requested changes as listed above.
torman
x
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
'Dunbar
x
x
x
ZA 86-36. The zoning request for
ZA 86-36
x
TR 4A1 of the John A. Freeman Survey,
Abstract S29 was considered for Light
'
Industrial Zoning District.
James Turner, owner of the property
'
was present and answered questions
for the commission.
Stoner noted that 8 notices were sent
with one reply, opposed to the zoning
'
change. Also, a petition was presented
opposing the zoning change.
Mr. Turner indicated he has been in
Southlake with the business since
1971, that he has invented or develop-
ed 20 products from old auto tires.
'
NAME OF
�MMISSIONER
�
o
3
0
,`-4
z
Cn
n
z
e
o
z
D
can
a
Z
d
<
d
>
n
z
C
d
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 24,1986
TIME: 7:30 p M.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
'
He stated he wants to double the
production plant.
'
Public Hearing:
Sonny James- speaking for entire group
(see petition). presented photos of
'
road conditions.
Don Ramsour- opposed
John Newberry- in favor
'
Pamula Muller- opposed
Jerry Forbes - opposed
C.S. Johnson - opposed
'
Darrell Fagli- opposed
Jim Burger- opposed
Joe Wright- why did Turner wait 15
years to start talking about
Beautifying land.
toner
x
Motion was made and approved to
ickes
x
x
recommend denying the request.
ilhelm
x
orman
x
orhis
x
cDaniel
x
Dunbar
'
x
x
ZA 86-19. The final plat of Massey
Addition was presented. It was noted
ZA86-19
that the Cheatham review letter is
"clean".
1
W.C. Massey, owner, was present and
Stoner
x
answered questions for the commission.
x
(ickes
ilhelm
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
orman
x
x
recommend approval to city council.
Vorhis
x
cDaniel
x
unbar
x
Bill Stoner stepped down for the
next agenda item as having a vested
'
interest.
1
'
'
ME OF
MMISSIONER
d
3
0
z
Cn
n
z
d
o
z
D
Cn
a
c7
<
�
d
>
v
z
Cn
<
o�
d
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 24,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
4
'
ZA 86-28. The final plat of Carmel
Bay was discussed.
ZA 86-28
John Moore asked for an alternative
for drainage easement on Lot 2,
due to dumping on corp of engineer
'Stoner
st
ppe
do
n
property as currently shown.
Fickes
x
Wilhelm
x
Motion was made and approved to approve
,Norman
x
x
with an alternate plan.
orhis
x
x
McDaniel
x
Dunbar
I
x
x
ZA 86-37. A zoning request for TR 6H
ZA 86-37
of the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract
S29 was considered for Light Industria
use. Land is currently Agricultural.
James Turner, owner, indicated he
'
wants to use the land for parking.
Public Hearing:
'
Don Ramsour- opposed as the property
is up against his home.
Jim Burger- opposed
'
Sonny James- all comments from first
request are repeated.
John Newberry- in favor.
'Stoner
x
After discussion, motion was made and
Fickes
x
x
approved to deny the request.
Wilhelm
'Norman
x
x
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
,Dunbar
x
x
x
ZA 86-31. The preliminary plat of
Forest Ridge Addition was considered.
ZA 86-31
John Levitt, engineer, explained the
plat for the commission. Owner, of th
'
property, Unique Custom Homes Inc.
was present. It was suggested Highlan
Avenue go through to the property.
Public Hearing:
Helen Taylor stated Highland cannot go
thru as it would go thru her property.
t
ME OF
MMISSIONER
d
3
o
3
0
n
d
a
--1
o
can
y
z
d
>
v
Z
-n
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: June 24,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
5
,Stoner
x
Fickes
Wilhelm
x
x
After discussion, motion was made and
x
approved to recommend approval of
Orman
x
the preliminary plat.
orhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
x
,Dunbar
The meeting was adjourned by Stoner.
I
Res ectfully submitted,
Sandra L. LeGrand rn
City Secretary ^�,`%' 'C=
:a,
1
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, n and for said
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared1
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath State that he has an
interest, as described below, in Agenda Item No.-6- of the -
198_.., City Council Agenda, as described below, and tha e
executing this Affidavit of Interest and shall refrain from any
vote or decision thereon, all as required by Article 988b, Texas
Civil Statutes Annotated:
At
Agenda Item:- ( Z-t- PG.4 7 L0,2-G.4,&".6G-
Interest Disclosed:.-ADme4o-rew'Veje - - - - - - - -
Signat e of Elected or Appointed
City ficial of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
GIVEN UPDFR MY HAND AND SEA OFFICE this the day of
19�
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89
Filed w'th me, this the .._day of OIL. 19.D_-6 at
o clock p.m.
City Secretary, City of Southlake
1
F
L
Ir 1
I�
I
11
1
1
1
1
-.A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
July 8, 1986
WORKSESSION
7:00 p.m.
Discussion: Land Use & Thoroughfare Uses.
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-40 Zoning request for Tract 1C1 of the L.A. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. 300. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for A-3 Single Family
District.
Owner: Wesley Thrasher.
Location: North White Chapel Road and West of
Dove Road.
Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-44 Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Owner: Al Conger.
Location: State Highway 114 East and the Southeast
corner of Carroll Avenue.
3. Discussion: Standard Operating Procedures.
4. Discussion: Recommendation to Council to eliminate "Gift of
Love".
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, July 3, 1986 at 4 p.m.
hl,X
City Secretary
'
NAME OF
'OMMISSIONER
d
M
3
0
z
cn
n
z
dZ
3
o
z
D
cc
Cn
a
d
<
�
o
>
v
z
Cn
<
__30
o
o
u
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: July 8,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS:
Chairperson; Bill Stoner, Vice-Chairper
son; Gary Fickes. Rick Wilhelm,
'
Ed Norman, Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel
and Martin Dunbar.
'
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Charles Curry.
STAFF PRESENT: Mike Monroe, Scott
'
Dyer and Director of Public Works;
Bill LeGrand.
The meeting was called to order by
'
Bill Stoner at 7:30 p.m.
oner
x
ckes
x
The Minutes of the June 14, P $ Z
ilhelm
x
x
meeting were approved as presented.
Orman
x
orhis
x
cDaniel
x
unbar
x
x
Agenda item #1 was deleted from the
agenda due to an administrative error.
Stoner stated that Cardinal Industries
will be on the council agenda for
July 15, for reconsideration.
'
ZA 86 44. A request was made for a
ZA 86- 44
Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer. The request
'
was made by Al Conger, the location
is Bill's Service Station, southeast
'
corner of SH 114 at North Carroll Ave.
It was established that proper notice
has been given and property owners with-
in 200' were notified. Six notices
were sent with one reply in writing,
in favor.
Mr. Conger was present and explained
he is leasing the property from Roger
'
Baird.
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
'
Motion
was made and approved to
'
`
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
�
d
M
3
0
z
Cn
n
CD
z
3tr.
o
z
a
Cn
a
<
o�
a
v
z
Cn
<
�
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE R ular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMI SION MEETING.
TIME: July .m.
7:30
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
toner
x
recommend approval to the city
ickes
x
x
council.
Wilhelm
x
x
lorman
orhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
unbar
x
A discussion was held on standard
operating procedures for the P & Z/
City Staff.
'
It was agreed Michael Monroe will
work with Bill LeGrand in establishing
'
a check list for subdivisions.
A discussion was held on "Gift of Love"'
plats. At the next P & Z meeting, a
consider item will be on the agenda
to recommend eliminating "Gift of Love"
to the City Council.
1
by Stoner.
The meeting was adjourned
'
Respectfully submitted
'
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
July 22, 1986
WORKSESSION
Discussion:
7:00 p.m.
Thoroughfare Plan.
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-39 Gift of Love Plat for Claude L. Shivers.
2. ZA 86-41 Preliminary Plat of the Thrasher Addition. A
2.89 acre tract of land out of the Larkin H.
Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300.
Location: North White Chapel Road and North of
Highway 114.
Owner: Wesley A. Thrasher
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-45 Request to replat Lots 1 & 2 of the Graham -White
Addition. Making Lots 1R & 2R, Block A.
Location: South Pine Street
Owner: Frank Graham.
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-46 Preliminary Plat approval for Heritage Industrial
Park. A 17.790 acres out of the Thomas Easter
Survey, Abstract No. 474 and the P.R. Splane Survey,
Abstract No. 1453 in the City of Southlake.
Location: Highway 26, east of tank farms.
Owner: Grapevine/Highway-26 Joint Venture.
Public Hearing.
S. ZA 86-47 Request to replat Lots 3,4,& 5, Block A of the
Brittany Place. Making Lots 3R, 4R & 5R.
Location: North Peytonville Road.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, July 18, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
'
NAME OF
1MMISSIONER
d
r"
s
rfl
0
z
Cn
n
z
M
o
z
D
can
a
z
d
<
c
a
a
z
<
d
'�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Re gul ar PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: July 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Rick Wilhelm, Carroll
McDaniel, Jim Vorhis and Ed Norman.
COMMISSIONER ABSENT. Gary Fickes,
Martin Dunbar.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand, City FPngineers;
'
Eddie Cheatham and Scott Dyer.
A worksession was held at 7 p.m. to
discuss the proposed Thoroughfare Plan.
'
Chairperson Stoner called the meeting
to order at 7:30 p.m.
Stoner asked that the record reflect
that he personally took exception to
three City Council members attempting
'
to influence the Citizens Select
Committee on issues which are to be
considered at future City Council
'
meetings according to their agendas.
He added that we need Industry in
Southlake and it will take lots of roof
tops to create a good tax base for
Southlake.
x
'Stoner
Wilhelm
x
x
The Minutes of the July 8, Planning
Norman
x
and Zoning Meeting were approved as
Vorhis
x
presented.
' McDaniel
x
x
Agenda Item #4, ZA 86-46 was tabled
x
at the owners request until the next
'Stoner
Wilhelm
x
x
P & Z meeting.
Norman
x
Vorhis
x
x
' McDaniel
x
ZA 86-39. The Gift of Love plat for
ZA 86-39
Claude L. Shivers was considered as
GIFT OF
presented.
LOVE
PLAT
'
'
NAME OF
rMMISSIONER
d
s
0
04
z
Cn
n
z
M
o
z
D
ca
Cn
a
z
C
o
o
a
n
z
<
o
d
'n
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: July 22,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
'
The percolation tests were presented.
After discussion, motion was made to
'
approve provided the one acre lot be
maintained, and 18' of right-of-way
be provided for widening of North Shady
Oaks Drive and the point of beginning
'Wilhelm
McDaniel
x
x
commence at the northwest corner of
Crumbaker Addition.
Mr. Shivers opposed to having to give
all the right-of-way.
The motion was amended to approve the
'
plat provided the one acre be maintaine
and the easterly right-of-way on North
Shady Oaks Drive be 64' and dedicating
the necessary portion of land to make
the 64' right-of-way. Also to relocate
Stoner
x
the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1
'Wilhelm
x
x
as shown on the plat.
Norman
x
Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-41. The preliminary plat of
Thrasher Addition was discussed. The
2.89 acre tract of land is out of the
'
Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract 300.
Owner of the property, Wesley Thrasher
was present for the meeting.
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
Motion was made to approve the prelim-
inary plat provided the items in
x
the Cheatham letter dated July 21,1986
'Stoner
Wilhelm
x
x
are corrected on the plat.
Norman
x
Vorhis
x
' McDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-4S
ZA 86-4S. The replat of Lots 1 & 2 of
the Graham -White Addition was reviewed.
The replat will change Lots 1 $ 2 to
Lots1R and 2R of Block A.
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
'
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
>
d
r"
3
0
z
Cn
n
z
d
o
z
D
Cnn
a
z
c
C
� o
d
>
v
z
Cn
C
�
d
CDDATE:
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
July 22,1986
TIME: 7 : 3 0 pp m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
toner
x
Motion was made and approved for the
ilhelm
x
x
plat subject to obtaining a drainage
Norman
x
study.
x
Forhis
cDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-47. The request for replat of
A 86-47
x
Lots 3,4, & 5, Block A of Brittany
lutoner
ilhelm
x
Place Addition was tabled at the request
Norman
x
x
of John Levitt, engineer for the owner.
Vorhis
x
x
F'McDaniel
x
The meeting was adjourned.
'
Re pectfully submitted
,tL`A
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary _,- :�_
/
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
SPECIAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
July 29,1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-47. Request for replat of Lots 3,4, 5, $ 6, Block A.
Brittany Place Addition.
Tabled from July 22, 1986 meeting.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, July 25,1986 at 3:30 p.m.
ity Secretary, Sandra L. LeGrand
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
d
C"
�
3
0
z
n
z
d
o
z
Cnn cc
n
d
o__3
�
d
n
z
Cf)
CD
o
o
CITY OF S CU fHLAKE , TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: July 29,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
1
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
'
Fickes, Jinn worhis and Carroll McDanie
ABSENT: Ed Norman, Rick Wilhelm
'
and Martin Durzbar. .
The Special Planning and Zoning
Commission neeting was called to
order by Stoner at 7:30 p.m.
ZA 86-47. The request for replat of
ZA 86-47
Lots 3,4, u 5 Block A of Brittany
'
Place Addition was reviewed. Stoner
explained that there was an error
on the plat that was submitted at the
last meeting.
Stoner
x
After discussion, motion was made and
Fickes
x
approved to approve the replat.
Vorhis
x
x
McDaniel
x
x
The meeting was adjourned by Stoner.
Re ectfully sub itted.
'
A'4�A_-
Sandra L. LeCrand-
City Secretary
�s'°li: Sill4iT1•.
t!
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
August 12, 1986
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-46 Preliminary Plat approval for Heritage
Industrial Park. 17.790 acres out of the
Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474 and
the P.R. Splane Survey, Abstract No. 1453
in the City of Southlake.
Location: Highway 26, east of tank farms.
Owner: Grapevine/Highway 26, Joint Venture.
Public Hearing.
2. Discussion: Thoroughfare Plan.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, August 8, 1986 at 3 p.m.
X Z"
city secretary
'
y
'
NAME OF
,OMMISSIONER
d
t"
rn
0
z
n
z
rrn
o
z
Cn
>
z
d
�
d
a
v
z
o__3
-n
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 12,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fickes, Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
'
Jim Vorhis and Martin Dunbar.
ABSENT: Carroll McDaniel.
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Charles Curry.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
'
Works ; Bill LeGrand. Scott Dyer,
City Engineer.
The Minutes of the Special Planning
'
Stoner
x
and Zoning meeting held on July 29,
x
were approved as presented.
Fickes
x
x
,,Wilhelm
Vorhis
x
x
Dunbar
x
Norman
absEnt
uri
g v
to
The Minutes of the July 22, Planning
and Zoning Meeting were approved as
corrected. Correction consisted of
Stoner wishing to have his personal
comments stricken from the minutes.
'
Stoner
x
Stoner stated he will provide a letter
Wilhelm
x
x
for the record.
' Fickes
Vorhis
x
x
x
Dunbar
x
Norman
abs
nt
luring
v
to
'
Bill Stoner stepped down for ZA 86-46
as having a vested interest in the
agenda item.
ZA 86-46. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-46
Heritage Industrial Park was
'
discussed. The 17.790 acre tract of
land is out of the Thomas Easter Survey
Abstract 474 and P.R. Splane Survey,
Abstract 1453.
Applicant is Grapevine/Highway 26
'
Joint Venture. Representative was
Scott Potela of PAWA Winkleman and
Associates. Varnel Roberts was also
present, representing the owner Watson/
'
Taylor.
y
'
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
d
r"
0
z
n
z
m
o
z
Cn
a
z
d
�
d
a
a
z
d
-n
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 12,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
'
The Cheatham review letter was discuss-
ed. The owners had no problem with
'
items 1.2, $ 4.
During the public hearing, Sonny James
had questions regarding the new
roadway to the property.
It was noted that the building set -back
were incorrect on the plat. Bill
'
LeGrand stated the side yard is against
the railroad tracts and that there
'
needs to be a 30' building line along
Continental Blvd.
Motion was made to approve the pre-
liminary plat provided that a 30'
Stoner
did
not
vot
building line be shown along Continenta
Blvd. and subject to the developer
Wilhelm
Fickes
l
x
x
x
discussing issues with the City Staff
and the Staff making recommendation
Vorhis
x
on Continental Blvd. through Tract C.
Dunbar
x
' Norman
x
x
During the discussion of the Thorough-
fare Plan, Gary Fickes referred to the
'
C.O.G. Mobility 2000 Map.
During the public hearing, Pamela
Muller presented for the record, a
'
map she drew of her ideas for a
Thoroughfare Plan.
Sonny James expressed concern over
'
South Kimball as it appears on the
proposed Thoroughfare Plan.
' Stoner
x
With no further comments, the meeting
Wilhelm
x
x
was adjourned.
Fickes
x
orhis
xRespectfully
Submitted
unbar
t
x
Erman
x
x
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
'"MAR-pf ared y Pa
Wa Mu11'er,`Eo be part of
the /r cord fo . the, P Z Mi,pAites of August 12,1986 ,E
V, 100�J, z
R• ` �'� � M 1 /.� ► =;� "'� ett��.. .w+��..:..� :lei
'T'' t 1 f ♦ 1---_--_--- . U
+ • . + 1aT y, 3� Sam Wr Yrr �1
IL
14
wig
IF
! 1� __` ➢
-- r ►+1 ` .
IY{P� � �r �YIII rW r,.W� WV' � � 0+ - ., � �_ = t • � � � �.
1
rold is
1
moo
as wr na wal �11 rr r1A ago .A MOO
�1
1
1
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
i
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared _\�{,(f�,tEr. IC-
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath state that he has an
interest, as described below, in Agenda Item No../- of the Avg,
19891�,, City Council Agenda, as described below, and that 17*
is executing this Affidavit of Interest and shall refrain from any
vote or decision thereon, all as required by Article 988b, Texas
Civil Statutes Annotated:
Agenda Item:.--Z.-.A-
.
Interest
Disclosed:.- 4.f7Zy,u5 ULtA�T _ .-M - 1*0WA- `-- ( f.a ftE4,r•aQ .
Sign atK
of Elected or Appointed
City ial of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEALWF OFFICE this the -2Jday of
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89
Filed with me, this the .._
o'clock p.m.
�,- day of �L(.0 _ . , 1/. at
ity Secretary, City of Southlake
' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
' August 26, 1986
7:30 p.m.
' AGENDA
' 1. ZA 86-31 Final Plat of the Forest Ridge Addition.
A 16.7 acre tract of land out of the T.M. Hood
Survey, Abstract No. 706.
Location: North Peytonville Avenue.
' Owner: Unique Incorporated.
Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-41
Final Plat of the Thrasher Addition. A 2.89
'
acre tract of land out of the Larkin H. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. 300.
'
Location: North White Chapel Road and North of
Highway 114.
Owner: Howard Thrasher.
Public Hearing.
'
3. ZA 86-48
Preliminary Plat of the Commerce Business Park.
Tract of land out of the Thomas Easter Survey,
Abstract No. 474.
Location: East Southlake Boulevard, West of
Bank Street.
'
Owner: J.R. Stacy.
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-49 Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
' Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Location: Shamrock Station corner of North Kimball
and East Dove.
' Owner: Donnie Ward.
Public Hearing.
S. ZA 86-SO Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
' Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Location: Gun Barrell corner of North Shady Lane
and East Northwest Parkway.
' Owner: Hossain Mostoufi.
Public Hearing.
6. ZA 86-51 Preliminary Plat of the North White Chapel United
' Methodist Chruch. A 4.7475 acre tract of land out
of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899.
Location: North White Chapel Road and South Pine
' Drive.
Owner: Ralph Evans, Chairman.
Public Hearing.
7. Discussion: Thoroughfare Plan.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
' bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake
Texas, on Friday, August 22, 1986 at 3 p.m.
■
City Secrbtary
FAME OF
COMMISSIONER
do
r"
0
z
z
M
0
z
Cn
a
z
d
o
d
a
v
z
W
o
d
Irl
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 26,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Vice -Chair-
person; Gary Fickes, Rick Wilhelm,
Carroll McDaniel, Martin Dunbar and
Ed Norman.
'
ABSENT: Chairperson; Bill Stoner,
and Jim Vorhis.
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand, City,Engineers;
Eddie Cheatham and Scott Dyer.
'
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Charles Curry
and Rick Stacy.
The meeting was called to order by
Vice -Chairperson, Gary Fickes as
Bill Stoner was absent.
The Minutes of the August 12, P $ Z
'
Meeting were approved as corrected.
Correction included, Wilhelm abstainin
from voting in the August 12 minutes.
ZA 86-31. The final plat of Forest
ZA 86-31
Ridge Addition was discussed. The 16.
t
acre tract of land is out of the T.M.
Hood Survey, Abstract 706.
'
Owner of the property, Unique Homes,
Barbara Bone, was present for the
meeting. John Levitt, engineer,
'
represented the owner in the discussion.
The C.AZ�atham Letter dated August 22,
was discussed. It was requested that
'
a letter be obtained from the
Ottingers concerning drainage.
During the public hearing, Les Clow
stated that if the developer will sod
the drainage area, it will be better
tickes
then a concrete drain and he will
agree with that.
x
Wilhelm
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
orman
x
recommend approval of the final plat.
cD4niel
x
Muuiiva i
1AME OF
.COMMISSIONER
x
0
z
Cn
o
z
rn
o
0-4
z
D
W
a
_
z
d
r=
>
n
z
Cn
<
o
d
171
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 26,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
2
ZA 86-41. The final plat of Thrasher
ZA 86-41
Addition was reviewed. Thrasher's
'
were not present due to illness in
the family.
'
There were no comments during the
public hearing. It was noted that all
corrections have been made and there
'
is a "clean" Cheatham Letter.
Fiches
x
Motion was made and approved to
Wilhelm
x
recommend approval of the final plat
'
Norman
x
to the City Council.
McDaniel
x
x
Dunbar
x
x
ZA 86-48. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-48
Commerce Business Park was discussed.
Owner, Rick Stacy was present for the
meeting as was engineer, Bob Raley
and Lloyd Carder.
It was noted by Rick Stacy that this
'
is actually a final replat and should
not have been treated as a preliminary
plat.
'
Ban
The property will be served by the
Place Sewer System. It was mentioned
that the sewer plant has a capacity
'
of 80,000 gallons and is currently
using 5,000 gallons Der day.
tDuring
the public hearing, Barbara
Bradford had questions concerning
zoning and platting. She owns propert
Fickes
x
within 200'
' Wilhelm
x
Norman
x
Motion was made and approved to
'McDaniel
Dunbar
x
x
x
recommend approval of the final plat.
ZA 86-49. A request was made for a
ZA 86-49
Special Use Permit for the Sale of
'
Off Premises Packaged Beer. Location
for the use is the Shamrock Service
Station at the corner of North Kimball
'
Avenue and East Dove Road. Owner of
the property is Donnie Ward, who was
present for the meeting and answered
questions.
'
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
d
M
3
0
H
z
cn
n
z
e
o
H
z
a
Cn
v
d
C
o�
u
>
H
z
<�
�
d
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 26,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
It was established that proper notice
'
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified. Four
'
notices were sent with no replies.
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
Mr. Ward explained his plans to the
Commission. He intends to remodel
the gasoline station and make a
'
convenience store. The parking was
discussed. Ward stated there will be
adequate parking on the front and on
'
the west side of the property, nine
spaces to be provided.
After further discussion, motion was
ickes
x
made and approved to recommend denying
ilhelm
x
x
the request.
Norman
x
cDaniel
x
x
Funbar
x
ZA 86-SO.The request for Special Use
ZA 86-SO
Fickes
x
Permit for the Sale of Off Premises
'Wilhelm
x
Packaged Beer for Gun Barrell Conven-
Norman
x
ience Store was tabled due to no
McDaniel
x
x
representation.
' Dunbar
x
x
The request was made by Hossain
Mostoufi.
'
ZA 86-51. The preliminary plat of
P Y
ZA 86-51
North White Chapel United Methodist
'
Church was discussed. The 4.747S
acre tract of land is out of the O.W.
Knight Survey, Abstract 899.
'
Representing the church was Ralph
Evans, chairperson. Harold Knight and
'
Dale Ryder were also present.
It was established that proper notice
has been given and property owners
'
within 200' were notified.
Eight notices were sent with one reply
in favor. There were no comments
'
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
3
t=1
M
0
z
cn
M
n
z
o
z
v
cc
Cnn
a
z
d
o
d
a
v
z
Cn
<
-q
d
�
0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: August 26,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
4
during the public hearing.
Fickes
x
After discussion, motion was made and
Wilhelm
x
approved to recommend approval of the
'Norman
x
preliminary plat.
McDaniel
x
x
Dunbar
x
x
'
A disucssion was held concerning the
proposed Thoroughfare Plan,.
Director of Public Works, Bill LeGrand
'
requested that P & Z recommend approval
of the plan to the City Council so that
he can have some guidelines to work
'
with. Particulars can be worked out
as we go along.
IP
It was suggested by Councilperson
Stacy that a Joint Worksession be held
between P $ Z and the City Council
on September 30 (5th Tuesday of the
'
month).
The meeting was adjourned by Fickes,
as there was no further business.
'
Re pectfully submitted,
r
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
'''��/�f111117111►►►►►````
1
U)
m
-0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
September 9, 1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-SO Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer.
Location: Gun Barrell Corner of North Shady Lane
and East Northwest Parkway.
Owner: Hossain Mostoufi
Public Hearing.
2. ZA 86-Sl Final Plat of the North White Chapel United
Methodist Church. A 4.7475 acre tract of land
out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899.
Location: North White Chapel Road and South Pine
Drive.
Owner: Ralph Evans, Chairman.
Public Hearing.
3. Consider: Thoroughfare Plan.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, September S, 1986 at 3 p.m.
'emxzt'�— " XZ&""tz;
City Secretary
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
3
d
�
0
0
cn
n
z
d
d
0
0
n
W
a
t7
o�
d
>
H
z
Cn
-el
-o
d
O
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: September 9, 1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson:
'
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson: Gary
Fickes, Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman, Carroll
McDaniel.
'
ABSENT: Jim Vorhis & Martin Dunbar.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Engineer:
'
Scott Dyer, Director of Public Works:
Bill LeGrand.
The meeting was called to order by
'
Bill Stoner at 7:30 p.m.
'Stoner
Fickes
X
X
The minutes of the August 26, P & Z
Meeting were approved as presented.
Wilhelm
X
Norman
X
' McDaniel
X
ZA86-50. A request was made for a
A86-50
Special Use Permit for the sale of off
Premises Packaged Beer by Hassain Mos-
toufi, new owner of the Gun Barrell
Market located in Southlake Plaza,
Southlake.
'
Mr. Mostoufi was present for the meet-
ing & answered questions for the
'
commission.
Chairperson Stoner noted that seven
notices had been sent to property
'
owners within 200' and there were no
replies or phone calls. There were no
comments made during the public hearing.
It was established that beer has been
sold on the location for approximately
'
four years under a previous owner.
Stoner
X
Motion was made and approved to recom-
Fickes
X
mend approval of the request to the
Wilhelm
X
City Council.
Norman
X
X
McDaniel
X
X
ZA86-51. The final plat of the White
ZA86-51
Chapel United Methodist Church was
presented to the commission. The pro-
'
perty, is a 4.7475 acre tract of land
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
t=
o
M
�
o
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
'
z
a
d
d
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
�
d
z
a
DATE: September 9, 1986
d
a
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
C
o
z
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
cn
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
o
z
TEXAS.
1AME
OF
COMMISSIONER
PAGE: 2 INDEX
'Stoner
Fickes
Wilhelm
'Norman
McDaniel
0
' Stoner
Fickes
'Wilhelm
Norman
McDaniel
X
X
X
111
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abst.
899.
Harold Knight made a presentation for
Ralph Evan, Chairperson for the church.
After the plat was presented and the
final review letter from the engineers
office reviewed, it was determined
that everything was in order.
Motion was made to recommend approval
of the final plat.
Consideration was given to a Thorough-
fare Plan.
A list of street right of way widths
was presented, as prepared and recom-
mended by the City Engineers and the
Department of Public Works.
The list was reviewed by the Commission
After discussion, Motion was made to
approve the Thoroughfare Plan except
for Kimball Rd. right-of-way, south
of FM1709 between Hwy 114 and Hwy 26.
(The list is attached to the minutes.)
The meeting was adjourned as there was
no further business.
Respectfully submitted, ""`ortil"',,,�
s
n
=C-D
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary ����'�,,�• ..... •••
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CITY COUNCIL -AND PLANNING AND ZCNING COIMISSION WORKSESSION
MEETING TO BE HELD AT:
September 23,1986
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Discussion:
667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas. City Council Chambers.
Thoroughfare Plan.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, September 19,1986 at 9:30 a. m.
City Secretary
1
1
1
r-,
'
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 14, 1986
'
WORKSESSION
7:00 p.m.
'
1. Discussion:
Zoning Map.
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 p.m.
'
AGENDA
1. Consideration:
Thoroughfare Plan.
'
2. ZA 86-52
Zoning request for Tract 3B, 2.9805 acres of
land out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686. Current zoning is Agricultural
'
request is for Light Commercial.
Location: Northwest corner of Shady Oaks and
Highway 1709.
'
Owner: Terry L. Weakley.
Public Hearing
3. ZA 86-53
Zoning request for Tract 3B4A? 1.35 acres of
'
land out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686. Current zoning is Agricultural
request is for Light Commercial.
Location: Northwest corner of Shady Oaks and
Highway 1709.
Owner: Terry L. Weakley.
'
Public Hearing.
4. ZA 86-54
Zoning request for Tract 2B4p 4.17 acres of
land out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
'
899. Current zoning is Agricultural request is
for A-2 Single Family District.
Location: South Pine and East on Lilac Lane.
Owner: Ralph Turley.
Public Hearing.
S. ZA 86-55
Preliminary Plat of the Sun Square Addition.
A 4.17 acre tract of land out of the O.W. Knight
'
Survey, Abstract No. 899.
Location: South Pine and East on Lilac Lane.
'
Owner: Ralph Turley.
Public Hearing.
6. ZA 86-56
Preliminary Plat of the Callicott Addition.
Tracts 1B3 and 1B5C out of the L. Chivers Survey,
'
Abstract No. 300, 12.97 acres.
Location East Dove Road and East of White Chapel.
Owner: Sonja and Terry Callicott.
Public Hearing.
7. ZA 86- 57
Request for Replat of Lots 15 and 16, Block 4 of
'
Diamond Circle Estates, making Lot 15R.
Location: North White Chapel Road and North 1709.
Owner: John M. Stevenson.
Public Hearing.
'
8. ZA 86-58
Request to Replat Lots 13 and 14, Block 2 of Trail
Creek Estates. Making Lots 13R and 14R, Block 2.
Location: North Peytonville Avenue.
Owner: James F. Kitpattick.
9. ZA 86-59 Preliminary Plat of Entex Addition. Tracts 4A,4A2
and 4A3, 3.85 acres of land out of the John Freeman
Survey, Abstract No. 529. Making Lot 1, Block A.
Location: South Kimball Avenue.
Owner: Entex Corporation.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin
board at city hall, 667 North Carroll A enue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday
October 10, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
7I
L
4
'LAME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
toner
Ickes
Wilhelm
' McDaniel
lorrection*
i
`3
Cn
rh
0
Z
d
r
0
a
0
Z
x
A enue South
K iml
0
rn
d
0
a�
Tall
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 14,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fickes, Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis and Carroll McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Martin Dunbar.
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Charles Curry.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Direttor of
Public Works; Bill LeGrand, City
Administrator; Larry Munsie, City
Engineers; Scott Dyer, Mike Monroe.
A worksession was held at 7 p.m.
where the new zoning map was discussedi
The regular meeting was called to
order and the minutes of the September
9, P $ Z meeting were approved as
presented.
Chairperson Stoner noted that the
State Highway Department will be
holding a public hearing on November
5 at 10 a.m. at the Christ Our King
Church in Southlake concerning the
realignment of FM 1709 through
Southlake.
The Thoroughfare Map was discussed.
Mike Monroe, City Planner, explained
several alternatives which he had
drawn as overlays for the map.
The alternatives cover the southeast
portion of town.
The Commissioners agreed after
discussion that they want to see
Monroe's sketch put on the map,*also
a 95' right-of-way for North Kimball
Avenue, with Brumlow revised to tie
onto South Carroll Avenue and last,
using four-way intersections whenever
possible.
INDEX
The map is to be voted upon at the
November 11,1986 P & Z meeting.
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
-3
o
z
n
z
d
d
a
z
Cnn
a
t�
_q
v
v
z
Cn
o
a
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 11,1111
TIME: 7.30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
ZA 86-52 and ZA 86-53, zoning request
ZA 86-52
'
from Agricultural to Light Commercial
ZA 86-53
was discussed. Al Vadari and John
Short were present representing
'
Terry L. Weakley, owner.
It was established that proper
'
notice has been given and property
owners within 200' were notified with
one reply, and one phone call.
Reference was made to a letter written
'
to Rick Stacy concerning ownership
of the property. It was determined
that the comments in the letter were
'
not a factor which would effect the
zoning action.
Mr. Vadari stated they had prepared
a site plan and that the proposed
structure would be approximately 35,00
square feet and that it would fall
'
under Retail 1 in the new zoning
ordinance.
'
There were no comments during the
public hearing.
Motion was made and approved to
ZA 86-52
toner
x
recommend rezoning ZA 86-52 as request
Ickes
x
x
ed.
ilhelm
x
x
orman
x
x
orhis
McDaniel
x
Motion was made and approved to
ZA 86--5
recommend approval of ZA 86-53
toner
x
Fickes
x
x
ilhelm
x
x
orman
x
orhis
x
McDaniel
x
t
ZA 86-54. A zoning request for
ZA 86-5
Tract 2B4 of the O.W. Knight Survey
Abstract 899 with current zoning of
Agricultural request is for A-2
Single Family District. Owner of the
property is Ralph Turley. Bill Uzell,
proposed owner was present and answer-
'
ed questions.
'
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
3
d
M
0
z
cn
n
z
o
z
a
Cnn
a
z
d
_:�
0-3
d
a
a
z
Cn
<
o�
d
'71
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 14,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
The 4.17 acre tract of land is propos-
'
ed to be subdivided.
During the public hearing, Marilyn
Acuff and Perry West had questions.
toner
x
Fickes
x
Motion was made and approved to
ilhelm
x
x
recommend approval for the zoning
Orman
x
x
change as requested. ,
Vorhis
x
�cDaniel
x
ZA 86-55. The preliminary plat for
ZA 86-55
Sun Square Addition was reviewed by
'
the commission.
Ten notices were sent with no replies.
They proposed to devide the 4.17 acres
into 3 tracts of land. The owner
indicated he had no problem with the
Cheatham review letter.
'
Public Hearing:
Marilyn Acuff requested to see the
'
plat.
It was noted that the front building
line should be changed to 35' on the
plat and that the engineer tie the
'Stoner
x
legal description to the plat.
Fickes
x
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
IWilhelm
Norman
x
recommend approval of the preliminary
Vorhis
x
x
plat.
McDaniel
x
'
ZA 86-56. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-56
Callicott Addition was discussed.
The property described as Tract 1B3 an
'
1B5C of the L. Chivers Survey, Abstrac
300 is a 12.97 acre tract of land,
currently zoned A-3 Single Family.
'
Sonja and Terry Callicott were present
and he answered questions for the
'
commission.
During the public hearing, Marilyn
Acuff urged P $ Z to be consistant
'
as she was required to build a street
'
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
d
r"
O
o
an
n
z
O
O
a
can
o
d
A
v
Z
0MINUTES
b
T,
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 14,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
4
'
with a similar subdivision.
Extensive discussion was held in
regards to the 25' driveway on each
'
of two lots.
Motion was made and approved to
recommend approval contingent upon
toner
Ickes
x
x
the city engineers approval of
Wilhelm
x
x
the driveway area being a common
driveway easement serving both lots.
lorman
x
orhis
x
x
McDaniel
x
ZA 86-57 The replat of Lots 15 & 16
ZA 86-57
'
Block 4, of Diamond Circle Estates,
making Lot 15R was discussed.
Owner, John Stevenson was present and
answered questions for the commission.
Stevenson explained he wants to
combine the lots to build his own home
'
on a 2 acre lot.
During the public hearing, Mark Camp-
bell had questions, and Howard Holmes
was opposed to the request.
x
ttoner
Ickes
x
Motion was made and approved to
ilhelm
x
recommend approval of the replat.
Norman
x
x
x
Iorhis
cDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-58. The replat of Lots 13 & 14
ZA 86-5
toner
x
of Block 2, Trail Creek Estates
Ickes
x
was tabled due to no representation.
Wilhelm
x
x
orman
x
orhis
x
x
cDaniel
x
ZA 86-59. The preliminary plat of
ZA 86-55
'
Entex Addition was discussed.
Larry McCallon, president was present
and answered questions. McCallon
agreed to comply with engineers
comments in letter dated 10-6-86.
1AME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
t
0
n
tT'
d
z
W
z
y
a
z
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 11,1111
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKEICOUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 5 INDEX
It was noted that the building line
'
of 301 should comply on the sides
facing Kimball to east and south.
There were no comments during the
'
public hearing.
Stoner
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
,Fickes
Wilhelm
x
recommend approval.
Norman
x
xVorhis
'
x
The meeting was adjourned.
McDaniel
i
x
co01`•tttn a ttlrrrrrrr
submitted4�,,����'
3Resectfully
Sandra L . LeGrand
City Secretary
✓��g/''I.3p11�lII�tt19#��e`````•`
1
1
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 28,1986
LOCATION OF MEETING:
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Consider:
2. Consider:
667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers.
ZA 86-58. Replat of Lots 13 and 14 of Trail
Creek Estates Addition. Making Lots 13R and
14R. Owner: James Kilpatrick.
Public Hearing.
Zoning Map.
Public Hearing.
NOTE: THE MEETING WILL ADJOURN AT 10:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 28.
IF NECESSARY, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL RECONVENE ON
OCTOBER 29, AT 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF
CITY HALL.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Friday, October 24,1986 at 3 p.m.
hva " /' /,A,�il
n ra L. LeGran
City Secretary
'
'
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
d
z
3
0
q
0
z
z
d
0
�
0
z
N
a
z
d
d
a
>
z
Cn
d
-n
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
'
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
'
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel.
'
COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Martin Dunbar.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand and City Engineer;
'
Mike Monroe.
The meeting was called to order by
'
Chairperson Stoner.
Stoner announced that at the November
11, P & Z Meeting, a public hearing
will be held to consider the new sign
ordinance. Also, a schedule for
platting will be discussed, as prepared
'
by our city engineers.
Stoner
x
The Minutes of the October 14, P Z
Fickes
x
x
meeting were approved as corrected.
ilhelm
x
Norman
x
x
'Vorhis
McDaniel
x
x
ZA 86-58. The replat of Lots 13 & 14
of Trail Creek Estates making Lots 13R
I
and 14R was considered. James
Kilpatrick, owner of the property was
present for the meeting.
It was established that 18 notices
were sent with no replies. No comments
'
were made during the public hearing.
The plat will show Lots 13R and 14R.
Stoner
x
Motion was made and approved to
Fickes
x
x
recommend approval of the replat.
Wilhelm
x
rman
x
rhis
x
x
.;Daniel
x
11
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
u
11
11
11
r
b.ier
,Ickes
ilhelm
orman
Vorhis
IcDaniel
11
('Wilhelm
Vorhis
11
'Stoner
Fickes
Wilhelm
-man
his
janiel
do
rn
3
0
0
z
z
d
o
0
z
W
a
Z
t�
rn
r
>
v
z
Cn
o
t7
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2
A public hearing was held in regard
to the zoning map showing reclassif
tion of certain property within the
City of Southlake.
The following persons spoke during
public hearing:
Norman Brown 9 acres of land out c
J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract 803, Tre
2A. Land was light industrial, she
agricultural on the new zoning map.
Mr. Brown wishes his property to Y
light industrial as it was an inveE
ment to him and he feels strongly i
should not be changed as it would I
an economic effect on he and his fz
x
Motion was made and approved to
x
recommend Il to the City Council.
x
x
x
x
x
x
Al Wilki representing E Systems Ti
u� Property is out of the L.G.I
Survey, Abstract 686. Tract 1C and
9.8 acres of land. The zoning map
shown 02 and the owners are request
R-2.
x
Motion was made and seconded to chi
x
to 01.
Property,owner to the west, Robert
Kathy Bronson, owner of Tr 1B was
present an is also requesting his
property be changed to R-2
The motion and second were withdrai
x
x
x
Motion was then made and approved 1
x
recommend R-2 for Tr. 1C,1C3, & 1B
x
x
out of the L.G. Hall Survey, Abstr,
x
686.
x
PLANNING
IL CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
s
ica-
the
f th
ct
wing
emai
t
ave
mily
ust
all
1C3.
ing
nge
,n .
U
Ict
INDEX
U
I
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
t
Fickes
' Wilhelm
Stoner
'Fickes
Wilhelm
Norman
-)s
Daniel D
.Daniel
' Stoner
Fickes
'Wilhelm
Norman
Vorhis
McDaniel
Stoner
ckes
lhelm
.rman
dorhis
McDaniel
4
d
r"
--3
rn
0
z
cn
n
z
d
t7
0
z
a
Cn
a
z
<
�
o
a
n
z
Cn
<
�
c
-�
0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3
Al Wilki representing, E Systems
Trust Fund is requesting I2 for a
portion of Green Meadow Addition.
new zoning map is showing Il zoning
previous zoning was Heavy Commercia
and Light Industrial. The property
is a portion of C.B. McDonald Surve
Abstract 1013. After discussion, IT
was made and seconded to leave I1.
x
x
Motion was withdrawn.
Motion was made and approved to apI
x
I2.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Al Wilki representing E Systems TrL
Fund requested the northwest cornet
of Continental Blvd. at White ChapE
Road (H. Granberry Survey, Tract 1(
1C3) be rezoned to Rl where the zor
map shows Agricultural.
x
Motion was made and approved to st,,
x
with base zoning (Agricultural).
x
x
x
x
x
Mrs. Snitzer, owner of the above
x
property stated she concurrs with V
Dan Story representing Southlake
Plaza Shopping Center wanted to be
record as opposing Heavy Commercial
Zoning. The current zoning is Lig}
Commercial and proposed for R1. S1
indicated they want business and
professional services to be allowec
and it is not included in Rl.
x
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
x
recommend it be left R1 but to ac
x
business and professional to R1 in
x
x
the ordinance.
x
PLANNING
[L CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
The
1
y,
otiol
rove
st
1
and
ing
a
ilkil
on
t
ory
0
INDEX
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
Stoner
ickes
ilhelm
orman
Vorhis
�cDaniel
1
1
toner
ickes
ilhelm
Norman
11-rhis
-.niel
1
�
d
r"
z
3
0
0
z
cn
n
z
rn
o
0
z
a
Cn
z
c7
<
o-
u
a
v
z
<
d
-n
;a
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE:
4
Jim Martin Spoke for Jellico Cornc
AAdditon The property was zoned
Heavy Commercial and shown on the n
to be changed to R2. Mr. Martin ha
a problem with the buffer yard
requirements. He feels it is a dov
grade of zoning and wants the uses
he had as Heavy Commercial. When a
Martin indicated he would look at
When polled, the commission agreed
corner needs further consideration.
Roger Lemieux new owner of Dee's
Hitc in Post, indicates the zoning
Light Commercial and the new map st
R1. He indicated he is not opposec
to R1 but he had questions about
"Grandfather Laws". It was recommE
by P & Z that a Special Exception
Permit be issued relieving the refit
ments for parking, square footage,
also for a feed store. Mike Monroc
x
stated "legal non conforming use tc
x
continue". Motion was made and apI
x
x
to recommend Special Exception Pern
x
x
with R1 as stated above.
x
x
Rod Castleberry- pass for now.
Sonny James- pass for now.
Ken Smith Had questions about his
property described as Lot 8 Blk A
of Briarwood Estates Addition. Thf
property was A-6 changed to Agricu:
He wants the duplex zoning to rema:
x
x
Motion was made to Special Except:
x
the lots in Briarwood that are curl
x
x
ly platted as duplex.
x
x
x
Ken Smith discussed his land on
West Highland and Hwy 114. The lai
is currently Light Industrial Chan;
to Il.
Motion was made to Special Excepti,
PLANNING
IL CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
r
ap
s
n
sked
PUD.,
the
was
ows
nded
.ire -
and
rove
it
Aura
.n.
.on
•ent -
id
;ed
)n t
INDEX
1
AME OF
OMMISSIONER
1
F
1
7
L
^t.oner
kes
aelm
Oman
vorhis
McDaniel
d
M
0
z
n
z
rr1
o
z
Cn
a
d
�
d
a
z
Cn
d
-rf
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: S
land as it is less than S acres.
Motion was withdrawn as it is not
necessary.
Jack Brewer- left the meeting.
Ed Walts- passed for now.
Harold Knight Discussed his duplex
lots in Briarwood Addition. He wou
like his lot to be 01. P & Z will
duplex lots onto City Council.
Harold Knight Discussed Southlake
Realty property on the northwest
corner of Highway 114 at North Whit
Chapel Road. The property was Ligh
and Heavy Commercial and was change
to R1 and R2. Knight agreed to dea
with Council on the zoning for the
property.
Joe D. Gregory L.G.Hall Survey, At
686 TR. 3J. He indicated his home
shown as SF3 and the rest of his
land shown Agricultural. He would
like to put a law office on the frc
one or two acres of land.
Stoner recommended he file a requeE
for zoning change at a later date.
John Marshall representing Watson/
Taylor. The land which is describe
as being TR 4A1 in the C.B. McDona]
Survey, Abstract 1013 was zoned Li€
Industrial was changed on the map t
I1. They are requesting I2. TherE
request is made for 12 so that the)
might be compatable with City of
Grapevine, as their project falls i
x
both cities.
x
x
x
Motion was made and approved to
x
recommend I2 zoning.
x
x
x
PLANNING
[L CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
ld
pass
e
d
1
St.
is
nt
t
d
d
ht
0
n
INDEX
I '
NAME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
t
1
1
1
1
3
d
arc
0
3
z
cn
n
z
ran
0
�
z
D
C
a
z
v
<
d
D
a
z
<
�
d
-�
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28 ,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 6
Pamela Muller stated that A Noise
Cone is compatable for residential
and that she is in favor of the new
ing ordinance.
Diane Smith Fawn Speaking in behal
of Jerry A coc is concerned that t
five duplex lots in Woodland Height
have been changed back to Agricultu
P $ Z replied that it will take zon
actions to get it changed.
Herb White passed for now.
Jim Burger Support new zoning map.
Dennis Mender Commending P $ Z and
City Council for all their efforts
and he hopes it goes through as pro
posed. Wants to see buffer yards
maintained.
Larry Jenkins Compliments P $ Z an
City Council on a job well done.
Barbara Hartz Patty Thomas Hood
Survey, Abstract 706 TR 8BlA and 81
Her house is on TR 81C and TR 8BIA
was Light Commercial. The map is n
showing all Agricultural. She is v
concerned. P $ Z feels land needs
be revalued.
Izek Gregory left meeting.
Steven Rosenbaum Representing Bird
Properties. Property in question i
located on Bank Place Addition. 14
acres of land. They are asking for
I2 for the entire tract of land.
The map is currently showing I1. I
was no recommendation made so that
Rosenbaum can study the project fur
It was suggested however, that they
look into PUD approach for 7 acres
land.
PLANNING
IL CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
zon-
f
he
s
ral.
ing
N
C
ow
ery
to
song
s
here
ther
of
INDEX
I
AME OF
OMMISSIONER
Stoner
'Fickes
Wilhelm
Norman
'Vorhis
McDaniel
'Stoner
Fickes
Wilhelm
`Torman
,rhis
,Daniel
t
tStoner
Fickes
Wilhelm
Norman
' Vorhis
-.Daniel
1
do
x
0
3
0
z
z
M
0
�
0
z
Cn
a
z
t7
rn
r
a
v
z
Cn
m
t7
-n
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 7
John Moore A 27 acre tract of land
off nort Kimball was discussed. 'I
Mahan Survey, Abstract 1049 TR 2A
and 2B. Owner would like to change
zoning from Agricultural and A-3
x
to PUD.
x
x
x
Motion was made to leave the zoning
x
SF3.
x
x
x
John Moore Land in question is in
A.H. C ivers Survey Abstract 299,
x
located on North Carroll Avenue. N
x
shows Rl across from the schools.
x
Motion was made and approved to the
x
x
to 01.
x
x
x
Theron Regan 20 acres of land out
the J.W. Hall Survey, Abstract 803
TR 1 and TR 5. Zoning was Light
Industrial, which was changed to
Agricultural. Mr. Regan wants zoni
changed to I2 to meet his needs as
is currently operating a business.
Mike Monroe stated that Council ind
ed he could continue to operate as
wholesale and retail nursey and if
sold the land they could continue t
operate the same. Therefore, they
changed the land to Agricultural.
Stoner suggested that a wholesale/
retail catagory be put into Il.
x
x
Motion was made to recommend propez
x
x
be left Agricultural with a Special
x
x
Use Permit for retail and wholesale
x
to allow the same use.
x
Skip Roberts Whispering Dell is
esignate SF3 on the map, accordir
to their deed restrictions it shou]
be SF2. Roberts agreed to check it
and bring his request to council.
PLANNING
IL CHAMBERS
SOUTHLAKE,
INDEX
homa
to
the
fap
nge
of
ng
he
scat
he
0
ty
.g
d
out
NAME OF
FOMMISSIONER
' Stoner
Fickes
tWilhelm
Norman
Vorhis
McDaniel
1
1
Stoner
Fickes
Wilhelm
Norman
'Vorhis
McDaniel
`oner
N lhelm
rman
Vorhis
McDaniel
:4
d
x
0
z
cn
n
z
rn
0
z
a
W
a
z
d
C
�
d
a
>
z
Cn
�
�o
d
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28 1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 8
x
Bob Goode Requests I2 for his ent
x
tract of land which is Good Airport
x
x
instead of I1. Motion was made and
x
x
approved for I2.
x
x
Janice Minor J.W. Hale Survey, Abs
803 TR 1 2B and 1A2. The map is sh
Agricultural, they wish to be I1.
The staff is to verify that the zon
was Light Industrial and have counc
look at it.
Ken Smith Thomas Easter Survey, Ab
474. TR 11A, TR S, TR SA. All the
property was Light Industrial, chan
to Il. Mr. Smith would like it to
I2.
Sonny James Wants to know if the P
are taking about land use map or z
map. He is opposed to Ken Smith
zoning change.
Dee Loveless She ask P $ Z to look
t e worst case under each classific
that folks are looking at rather th
the most minor use. Most folks are
asking for speculative uses. She
feels we have to deal with what we
today and not what is comming in 10
x
years.
x
Motion was made to keep Ken Smith's
x
x
land on Crooked Lane as I1.
x
x
x
x
Gary Fickes stepped down as a P & Z
member for the next item.
x
Gary Fickes Thomas Easter Survey,
x
x
Abstract 474 TR 2A3 was Light Indus
x
and changed to 01. He is requestin
x
R1. Motion was made and approved f
x
x
Rl.
PLANNING
[L CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
Lre
trac
Twin
ing
it
st.
ged
be
$ Z
oninj
at
atic
an
have
tria
or
INDEX
I
NAME OF
(COMMISSIONER
d
o
0
z
z
m
o
o
z
a
z
d
d
D
a
z
J
_
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: October 28,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 9 INDEX
I
Pamela Muller She is asking SF3
or the five A-6 Lots in Woodland
Heights.
'
Motion was made to accept the zoning
map with the changes as outlined in
Stoner
x
these minutes with research where
'
Wilhelm
x
x
needed. Also to pass on the letters
Fickes
x
x
presented to City Council for considera
Norman
x
tion.
' Vorhis
x
McDaniel
x
The meeting was adjourned by Chairperso
'
Bill Stoner.
Re pectfully submitted,
t°tttetttrmrrurp",'
�SOVTN4q�����''
'
Sandra L . LeGrand
City Secretary
1
II
n
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST
THE STATE OF.TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared _ V:j -5 . ,
who after being by me duly sworn, did on oath State that he has an
interest, as described below, in Agenda Item No._.. of the .O c-7�_ __ ,
Zt , 1986 , City Council Agenda, as described below, and that he
is executing this Affidavit of Interest and shall refrain from any
vote or decision thereon, all as required by Article 988b, Texas
Civil Statutes Annotated:
Agenda Item •
Interest Disclosed:.
Signature of 6lected or Appointed
City Official of the City of South -
lake, Texas.
GIVE U D R MY HAND AND SEAL �QF OFFICE this the _ ... day of
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2-4-89
File with me, this the - _ �,y . _.day of ��-CC�. , 19�(O at
?�0 o'clock p.m.
City Secretary, City of Southlake
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 11, 1986
WORKSESSION
1. Discussion:
7:00 p.m.
Platting Procedures.
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-59 Final Plat of Entex Addition, 3.85 acres of land out of the
John Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Lot 1, Block A.
Location: South Kimball Avenue.
Owner: Entex Corporation.
2. ZA 86-60 Zoning request for Tract 3A4, 5.13 acres of land out of the
R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207. Current zoning is
Agricultural request is for Planned Unit Development.
Location: North White Chapel Road.
Owner: Barbara and Joel Barks.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-61 Zoning request for Lot 17, Block E of the Oak Knoll Addition.
Current zoning is Agricultural request if for Office 1.
Location: Southeast on Highway 114 on Oak Knoll Drive and
end of Cul-de-Sac.
Owner: Don Botik.
Public Hearing.
4. Consider: Thoroughfare Plan.
S. Consider: Sign Ordinance.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin board
at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas on Friday November 7, 1986
at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
'
�AME OF
OMMISSIONER
z
M
M
o
z z
>
~
? >
c
Z
_3
�
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
Reaular
MINUTES OF THE b PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: November 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDE:
COIN51ISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
'
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
Carroll McDaniel and Martin Dunbar.
'
COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Jim Vorhis
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of
'
Public Works; Bill LeGrand, City
Engineer; Scott Dyer.
'
CITY COUNCILPERSON: Charles Curry.
WORKSESSION: Was held at 7 p.m.
where a discussion was held in regards
to Procedures for Preliminary and
Final Plats
Bill Stoner called the meeting to orde
toner
x
at 7:30 p.m. The minutes of the
October 2811986 Planning and Zoning
Ickes
x
x
Meeting were approved as presented.
Wilhelm
x
x
Forman
cDaniel
x
x
Dunbar
x
'
ZA 86-59. The final plat of Entex
Addition was presented to the
ZA 86-5
commission. Bryan Ragle, Director of
Entex was present and answered questiolis
'
for the commission.
Current zoning of the property in
question is Light Industrial.
'
Mr. Fickes addressed the site plan.
He indicated where the plat shows
33 parking spaces, according to the
city ordinance, 76 spaces will be
10
needed.
'
Fickes also wanted it on record that
James Turner is living in offices
and that is a violation to our zoning
ordinances.
'
y
LE OF
COMMISSIONER
3
a
x
rn
o
z
cn
n
Z
rn
o
z
D
Cnn
n
z
o
<
�
o
>
z
Cn
<
�
o
-M
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: November 1111986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
Wilhelm stated items in the November 4,
Cheatham review letter are not
'
addressed on the final plat.
During the public hearing:
'
Jerry Forbus- opposed to the final plat.
Stoner
x
After further discussion, motion was
'Fickes
x
made to approve the final plat.
Wilhelm
x
x
,
Norman
x
Motion was approved.
'McDaniel
x
Dunbar
x
x
x
ZA 86-60. The zoning request for Trac
ZA 86-6
'
3A4, a 5.13 acre tract of land out of
ZONING
the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract 1207
was considered. The current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Owner of the property is Joel and
'
Barbara Barks. Barbara Nunn was prese
t
and represented the owners.
It was established that proper notice
'
has been given and property owners
within 200' were notified as per
ordinances.
Ms. Nunn stated that the reason for
the PUD request is for use as a
Animal Kennel Facility. The existing
residence will be occupied by a manage
for twenty-four hour care of the
animals.
The purchaser, Lyn Eggars was present
'
and made a presentation. She indicate
there would be one full time person
living in the residence, another
full time person employed and a part-
time person employed.
toner
Fickes
x
x
There were no comments during the
'Wilhelm
x
x
public hearing.
Norman
McDaniel
x
x
x
Motion was made and approved for PUD
' Dunbar
x
Il Zoning.
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
v>
0
q
0
z
z
M
m
o
--i
o
z
a
Z
v
c
>-n
a
z
Cn
o
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: November 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 3 INDEX
A discussion was held concerning the
Kennel and Residence on the front of
'
the property.
ZA 86-61. Zoning for Lot 17 Block E
ZA 86-6.
Oak Knoll -Lakeview Addition was
'
considered for 01 Zoning.
'
Don Botik was present as owner of the
property and answered quettions for
the commission.
Notices were sent and property owners
'
notified as per ordinances.
One reply was received, in favor.
Mr. Botik indicated he planned to
toner
x
build a two story garden office park.
ickes
ilhelm
x
x
x
After discussion, motion was made and
Norman
x
approved to approve the zoning to
cDaniel
x
Office 1.
unbar
x
x
The Thoroughfare Plan was considered.
Monroe Way was discussed at the
'
October 14 meeting as the one the
commission was in favor of.
'
Gary Fickes informed the commission
that CONET, COG and Citizens from
Keller met to discuss the new freeway
'
which is being planned to go through
Southlake in an east -west position
in the southerly portion of the city.
'
A discussion was held concerning the
freeway being proposed in the souther-
ly portion of Southlake.
After discussion, motion was made to
adopt the Thoroughfare Plan with
'
Monroe's Way for South Kimball Avenue
'
y
'
�ME OF
MMISSIONER
o
'T
0
0
z
n
z
M
o
o
z
Cn
a
v
�
o
>
z
--a
v
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: November 11,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4 INDEX
toner
x
and deletion of freeway alignment
ickes
x
x
until there is another/better way.
Wilhelm
x
x
Lorman
cDaniel
x
Dunbar
x
x
The Sign Ordinance was discussed.
SIGN
Charles Curry and Gary Fickes
ORDINANI
'
answered questions for the Commission.
A general discussion was held with
'
the audience participatink.
x
Motion was made to accept the sign
(toner
ickes
x
ordinance as written with a seven
ilhelm
x
x
day permit for non-profet organization
and also, that a restriction on the
man
x
number of protective signs be removed.
aniel
L*
x
unbar
x
x
The item is to go to council with a
tie -vote.
With no further business, the meeting
'
was adjourned by Chairperson Stoner.
'
submitted,
;Relsectfully
�1
Sandra L. Lle rand47
City Secretary
V
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
_ SY SI SW SM\SG1 Slt \
�r n M Jf s
IE U Cad CNA A S M A H ill Y � sA.e sAib• ii- lirl if�ri�i :s1=`xr:/J 2f6\ • `
4�041I
SURVEY ABST. 21049 L
16 he. �'1' 1
1' Y AffT N!B f� a
S
- --1 2.I}raa 2NJ- 2Q 7•q '2f•L--
2B - 2 • >0 %F>!_. SD
x2 26I 2� lL�2MI 2f
20 sl _ . � Sa ses ' ••• j 1 1 _I i �.
/2c1 ..K SCR ,.J'i. P� 2K 2E 20, 2RT 7M!
th 7A2 DO 1` fli�o�
sB-z T—ysfzo 01
r: t�
ate_ •••• 2Az
�, SB2c
2ATA
�� • — —l62B SezA • I� ' �/-
NORTHWEST RERKIIKY EAST �� 1
•• i
M
"op 35
16.
i_
M/► 1
• 2c 2 28 02 lb
2 �'1♦♦
f �WAS
• 2C � ♦ • � 6A 60 1 7E
IR j U pR 20 . I
IS Ar x 2As At 2i
• p' • _.I_ J ♦ - 1—. 2A! 2A2A AAI
d - 41 I w - ?' I 2AIA 2�
S I 2AI 1.
• � %A,
r 2A) ♦♦ 7A
• do I S 11 11A �♦
♦♦ - .- 11E
ID
\ 11 ♦♦ sUHv 1 ABST. NO
• t 1
SURV€Y A NO 29
1 Aft ♦ A
�'� • _ % : '`�.� � �- - pP�s - of ♦1: ,,
Ila ♦1
2 •�'
•� AAS 1 Ilos/fO4 ♦♦
� 1
20 Aa %% .t - -
♦
Aft I♦ 7
I 01 fit -� J��pILIAC
•
j.0A, 174A. 2145u I may. �. • ,� �
EE sunver• 'BST N91o1s ,,
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 2S, 1986
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. ZA 86-62 Final Replat of Lots 8R & 9R of the Continental
Park Estates, making Lot 8R-R, Block 2.
Location: East Continental Boulevard.
Owner: Roy Johnson.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin
board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas on Friday
November 21, 1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
11E OF
1MISSIONER
d
o
0
z
n
C'
d
0
0
z
Cf)
a
Z
t7
a
>
v
z
a
e
o
�0
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE Regular PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: November 25,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
'
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and
Martin Dunbar.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public
Works; Bill LeGrand and Engineers;
'
Eddie Cheatham and Scott Dyer.
'
The meeting was called to order by
Bill Stoner. The Minutes of the
Stoner
x
x
previous meeting were approved as
es
*elm
presented.
x
Orman
x
Vorhis
x
Daniel
x
x
nbar
x
x
ZA 36-62. The final replat of
'
Lots 8R and 9R of Block 2, Continental
Parr. Estates was considered for
Roy and Vicki Johnson.
'
Mr. Ray Treitt was present and spoke
for the owners.
oner
x
After discussion, motion was made
ickes
x
and approved to recommend approval
Wilhelm
x
of the replat.
trman
x
x
rhis
x
McDaniel
x
x
The meeting was adjourned by Bill
nbar
x
Stoner.
'
Re ectfully s/ub tted,
fJn 4a
'
LeGrand
City Secretary
I
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION: DECEMBER 2,1986
i l\ll . TT/1lT l�T 1(TTTTT�T P� _
667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas,
City Hall Kitchen.
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
Discussion: Reclassification of Zoning Map.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Tex s, on Wednesday, November 26,1986 at 4 p.m.
City Secretary
N
LI
I
December 12, 1986
Dear Landowner:
As you are aware, we are making an effort to reclassify your property
' in accordance to our new zoning map. Currently your property is
zoned either heavy or light commercial and will be reclassified to
one of the following districts: Retail-1, Retail-2, Office 1, or
Office-2.
After reviewing the enclosed zoning descriptions, please choose the
district which will best suit your needs. Your choice will be reviewed
' and acted upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City
Council. A form letter has been enclosed for your convenience. Please
return this form to City Hall by December 31, 1986.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Should you have any
questions, please call 481-5581.
' Sincerely,
City of Southlake
William D. LeGrand
' Director of Public Works
WDL/kg
' Enclosures
N
The following form should be filled out and mailed to the
City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North
Carroll Avenue, Southlake, TX. 76092. PLEASE RETURN THIS
FORM BY
My property is currently zoned
that it be reclassified to the
district.
Comments:
Signature:
Date:
Address:
Office Use Only:
Area:
Abstract/Tract or Subdivision/Block/Lot:
I request
zoning
5.8 OFFICE - 1 - The regulations set forth in this section, or as
N set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this
section, are the regulations of the "01 - Office One District."
t 5.8-1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - This district is intended to encourage and
permit general professional and business offices of high site
quality and appearance in attractive landscaped surroundings
with the types of uses, and design exterior appearance so
controlled as to maintain the integrity and be generally
compatible with existing and future adjacent and surrounding
single-family development. This district should generally be
' located in areas abutting arterial and/or collector streets
which are, because of location and trends, suitable for develop-
ment of office uses that are compatible with residential uses
' thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing and
developing neighborhoods. This district is also ideally located
in transitional areas between commercial and residential
development which is adaptable to occupancy by certain office
' uses. The ultimate development must provide a low intensity of
land usage and site coverage to enable the site to retain its
park -like image for the residential neighborhoods nearby and for
' the tenants that seek pleasant landscaped surroundings.
5.8-2 USE REGULATIONS - Land, buildings and structures may be used
only for the purposes set forth in this section. More than one
' building per lot is permitted assuming requirements in other
portions of this and other ordinances are still met.
' 5.8-3 PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES - Including but not limited to the
following types of offices and related retail uses:
a. Medical (Outpatients Treatment Services Only:
' , Ph siciansPsychiatrists, Psychologists, Etc.
Y Y
Dentists
' Chiropractors
Optometrists
Podiatrists
' b. General
Corporate headquarters [when used for office purposes only]
Chamber of Commerce
Real estate and insurance
Accounting and tax preparation
Law
Architecture, engineering, planning and land survey
Banking, finance and savings and loan
Consumer and mercantile credit reporting, adjustment and
' collection services
N
" I
5-15
!J
Employment and stenographic services
Utility offices and bill -paying services
'
Advertising agencies
Duplication and mailing services
Interior design
'
Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters
and exchange offices
Business holding and investment services
Contractor's office provided no outside storage or display
'
is permitted
Travel bureau
Computer services
'
Management consultants
Title companies
Radio, recording and television broadcasting
tb.
Community Uses - Public, semipublic and private parks,
recreation and open space including: playgrounds, parkways,
greenbelts, ponds and lakes, botanical gardens, pedestrian
'
paths, bicycle paths, equestrian bridle trails, nature
centers, bird and wildlife sanctuaries, libraries and City
Hall(s) and other uses of a similar nature and character.
1
1
' 5-16
.9 OFFICE - 2 - The regulations set forth in this section, or as
set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this
section, are the regulations of the "02 - Office Two District.
' The regulations for this district are identical to those for
O1 excepting for building height. As shown in the Schedule
of District Regulations, 01 permits only a two story building
' whereas 02 permits a six story building.
1
1
4
5-17
N 5.10
1
RETAIL - 1 - The regulations set forth in this section, or as
set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this
section, are the regulations of the "R1 - Retail One District."
5.10-1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - This district is intended for a unified
grouping, in one or more buildings, of several, typically five
or more retail and service shops or stores that provide for the
regular needs and are for the convenience of local residents.
It is intended that the development within a district or tract
be developed as a unit, with adequate off-street parking for
customers and employees, with coordinated architecture, and with
appropriate landscaping and screening to insure compatibility
with adjacent land uses.
5.10-2 USE REGULATIONS - Land, buildings and structures may be used
only for the purposes allowed in this section.
' 5.10-3 PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES
' FOOD AND BEVERAGE
Grocery Store
Bakery
' Dairy Store
Meat, Fish (Retail)
Catering, Cafe
Supper and Night Clubs
Frozen Food Locker
PERSONAL SERVICES
' Barber & Beauty
Music, Dance, Art
Health, Weight
Travel
' Pet Grooming
Laundry & Dry Cleaning
Laundromat
GENERAL MERCHANDISE
Drug Store
Jewelry & Watch
'
Florist
Landscape, Greenhouse
Camera
Department, Discount, Variety
'
Arts, Crafts, Hobby
Household, Antique
'
Paint
Pet
Bait & Tackle
Hardware
Bicycle
Sporting Goods
Service Station
'
S-18
I
REPAIR
Bicycle
Clothing Repair, Alterations
Locksmith
Camera, Jewelry & Watch
Household Appliance
AUTOMOTIVE
'
Car Wash
Parts & Accessories
Class, Mufflers, Upholstery
Auto Repair (Goodyear)
5-19
4
1
5.11 RETAIL - 2 - The regulations set forth in this section, or as
' set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this
section, are the regulations of the "R2 - Retail Two District.
' 5.11-1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - This district is intended for a unified
grouping, in one or more buildings, of several, typically five
or more retail and service shops or stores that provide for the
regular needs and are for the convenience of local residents.
' It is intended that the development within a district or tract
be developed as a unit, with adequate off-street parking for
customers and employees, with coordinated architecture, and with
' appropriate landscaping and screening to insure compatibility
with adjacent land uses.
The regulations for this district are identical to the regula-
tions for the R1 District excepting that the maximum building
size permitted in R1 is 40,000 square feet whereas the maximum
building permitted in the R2 District is 100,000 square feet.
' Retail facilities comprising an aggregate floor space in excess
of 100,000 square feet must be permitted under the Planned Unit
Development regulations contained in this ordinance.
t
1�
1
1
5-20
12dCUS =ZX21bZ NUMEN ENO
SECTION 6 - SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS
6.1 MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS, MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS,
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT, MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE
MARK
ZONING DISTRICTS
CLASSIFICATION
HSE SIZE
RANGE -
AREA SF
PER FAM
MAX*
RES.
DENS
DU/AC
MIN LOT SIZE
AREA (SF)
PER/FAM TOT
REQUIREMENTS
WIDTH DEPTH
FT FT
MIN.
FRNT
FT
YD REQMTS
EA
SIDE REAR
FT FT
MAXIMUM
BUILDING HT
STOR FT
MAX.
LOT
COVERAGE
PERCENT
AG
AGRICULTURAL
1500
& OVER
0.1
435600
435600
300
500
40
25
40
3.0
40
10a
RE
RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
2000
& OVER
0.2
217800
217800
300
300
40
25
40
3.0
40
20a
SF1
SINGLE FAMILY RES.
2000
& OVER
1.0
43560
43560
150
150
40
20
40
3.0
40
20a
SF2
SINGLE FAMILY RES.
1750
- 2200
1.0
43560
43560
125
125
40
20
40
2.5
30
20a
SF3
SINGLE FAMILY RES
1500
- 2100
1.0
43560
43560
100
125
40
20
40
2.5
30
20a
MIN.SIZ
MIN.
MAX.
BLD.-SF
TRACT
BLD.
OR
SIZE
PARK
(SF)
(SF)
PUD
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
N/A
130680
N/A
(IN
SITE PLAN)
[IN
SITE PLAN)
50
CS
COMMUNITY SERVICE
N/A
N/A
N/A
[YARDS, ETC. WILL
30
15b
10c
2.5
30
50
BE REVIEWED UNDER
01
OFFICE 1
5000
N/A
N/A
SITE PLAN RQMTS)
30
15b
10c
2.0
30'
50
02
OFFICE 2
5000
N/A
N/A
30
15b
loc
6.0
90
50
R1
RETAIL 1
15000
N/A
40000
30
15b
loc
2.5
50
50
[PROPOSED PROJECTS
R2
RETAIL 2
15000
N/A
100000
NOT MEETING THESE
30
15b
loc
2.5
50
50
REQUIREMENTS MUST BE
I1
INDUSTRIAL 1
N/A
217800
N/A
SUBMITTED AS A PUD)
30
15b
loc
2.5
50
60
I2
INDUSTRIAL 2
N/A
217800
N/A
30
15b
10c
2.5
50
60
*Maximum residential density is the number of dwelling units per acre, not including streets, alleys or public open space.
N/A - Not Applicable
a - Except the sum total of accessory buildings may not exceed 1000 sq. ft. per acre.
b - Where abutting a lot zoned or used for residential purposes [RE through SF31, there shall be a 25 foot side yard.
c - Where abutting a lot zoned or used for residential purposes [RE through SF31, there shall be a 25 foot rear yard.
T E X A S
STREET ADDRESS:
'7605 McCALLUM BLVD.
DALLAS, TEXAS 75252
1
L O U 1 S 1 A N A • O K L A H O M A
WILLIAM F. COULTER COMPANY, INC.
MANUFACTURERS REPRESENTATIVES
TELEPHONE: AC 214/248-0157
December 18, 1986
Mr. Bill LeGrand
City of Southlake
Carroll Rd,
Southlake, Texas
Dear Bill:
• A R K A N S A S
MAIL ADDRESS:
BOX 835390
RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75083
Cathy and I would like to excuse ourselves from
the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on
December 13, 1986 due to illness. As you are
aware we were also subjected to some changes
from Mr. Kaiser at the last minute and will pro-
bably have to replat our proposal to insure its
correctness.
' Please extend our apologies to the board and
assure them of our good intentions.
Thanking you in advance for your kind considera-
tion and co-operation, I am.
Sincerely yours T
' SteP h n C. Kidwell
1
' . ' . ot�ve doors F EQ( RN
pA It 3 o N r
A►'COMSOM SS CiAMN MEn,�R ,
fRAlAT10�' �A3sod
1
1
1
1
1
City of Sauthlake
667 North Carroll Ave Southloke, Texas 76092
LEGEND
P & Z Meeting
City Council Meeting
Review Comments Available
Submittal Deadline
(for P & Z Meeting 3 weeks
later)
CITY C7OUNCIL
Lloyd Latta*- Mayor
Davis Bradley'*
Charles Curry
David McMahan
Rick Stacy
Johnny Westerholm*
P & Z CC WISSION
Bill Stoner - Chairman
Martin Dunbar*
Gary Fickes
Carroll McDaniel*
Ed Norman
Jim Vorhis
Rick Wilhelm
* Term expires April 1987
Larry Munsie - City Administrator
Sandy LeGrand - City Secretary
Bill LeGrand - Director of Public Works
PHONE NUMBERS
City Hall - 481-5581
Police - 481-5581
Fire - 481-5581
Cable -
Telephone -
Texas Power & Light -
Tri-County Electric -
Lone Star Gas -
1987 CALENDAR
S M T W T F S
JANUARY
1 2 3
4 t & 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 .- r 21 22 X 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
FEBRUARY
1 A 41 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 & 0 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MARCH
1 A 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 0 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
APRIL
540 8 9 A 1
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 A 0 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
MAY 1 2
3A.06 7 819
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 At JP 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
,uNE #R 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 &0 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
S M T
W
T
F
S
JULY
1
2
3
4
5.. i891011
12 13 14
15
16
17
18
19,E &
22
23
325
26 27 28
29
30
31
AUGUST 1
2 & • 5 6 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 19 9 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 A
SEPTE'T BER
2
3
41
5
3
A
6
17
18
19
20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28 29
30
OCTOBER
1
2
3
4if1
8
910
11
12 13 14
15
16
17
18
1 21
12
23
24
25
6 27 28
29
30
31
NOVEMBER
1�•4
5
17
8
10
11
12
13
14
15111118192021
22
3 24
25
26
27
28
29
DECEMBER
•
2
3
4
5
6
1 8
9
10
11
12
13
j& A
16
17
1-8
19
20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28 19
30
31
EDDIE CHEATHAM &► ASSOCIATES
CONSULTINM ENUSNEE LAND PLANNERS
I601 E LAMAR BLVQ, SUITE 212 ARLINGTON, TX. 76011
(817) 460— 2111 METRO 26 5 — 7948
I
For Applicants Use
' Mon:
by 5:00 p.m.
Fri:
City of Southlake
FINAL PLAT PROCEDURE
PROCESS
Contact City Zoning clerk for applica-
tion package.
Application package received by zoning
clerk 3 weeks prior to applicable P & Z
meeting. Application must be complete
including fees, signed application forms
and required blueprints for acceptance by
the zoning clerk.
City Zoning clerk distributes plans to
staff, City Engineer and applicable utility
ccmpanies.
Review comments available at the City
Secretary's office.
1 . I
P & Z meeting: Applicant should be present
'Iles: to represent project.
7:30p.m.
Deadline for re -submittal of any plans
' Fri: revised per P & Z recommendations or the City
by 5:00 p.m. Engineer's review letter.
�'rl I
I City Engineer final review comments
available.
`Iles • City Council meeting: Applicant should be
present to represent project. The final plat and
7:30 •p.m. construction plans must be revised to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer prior to the approval
of the final plat. The applicant may ask that the
project be tabled to allow time for corrections to
the construction plans.
1) Application Form
2) Fees
3) Perc 'Pests
4) Construction Plans
5) Blueprints of Plat
6) Sets of Constr. Plans
Final Plat Approved I I Final Plat Disapproved
1) Blueprints of Plat _
2) Mylar oriqinal of Plat
3) Sets of Constr. Plans
Revise and re -submit the
final plat
* All plans hand carried to the City Engineer by the Applicant
for reasons of expediency must be stamped as received by
the City Secretary of Southlake.
'
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
1987
PLAT REVIEW SCHEDULE
REVIEW
FINAL
REVIEW
SUB11ITTAL
COMMENTS
P & Z
REVISIONS
COMMENTS
COUNCIL
DEADLINE
AVAILABLE MEETING
DEADLINE
AVAILABLE
MEETING
1-5
1-23
1-27
1-30
2-6
2-17
'
1-19
2-6
2-10
2-13
2-20
3-3
2-2
2-20
2-24
2-27
3-6
3-17
'
2-16
3-6
3-10
3-13
3-20
4-7
3-2
3-20
3-24
4-3
4-10
4-21
'
3-16
4-10
4-14
4-17
4-24
5-5
4-6
4-24
4-28
5-1
5-8
5-19
4-20
5-8
5-12
5-15
5-22
6-2
5-4
5-22
5-26
5-29
6-5
6-16
'
5-18
6-1
6-5
6-19
6-9
6-12
6-19
7-7
6-23
7-3
7-10
7-21
6-15
7-10
7-14
7-17
7-24
8-4
'
7-6
7-24
7-28
7-31
8-7
8-18
7-20
8-3
8-7
8-21
8-11
8-25
8-14
8-28
8-21
9-4
9-1
9-15
8-17
9-4
9-8
9-11
9-18
10-6
'
8-31
9-18
9-22
10-2
10-9
10-20
9-14
10-9
10-13
10-16
10-23
11-3
'
10-5
10-19
10-23
11-6
10-27
10-30
11-6
11-17
11-10
11-13
11-20
12-1
11-2
11-20
11-24
11-27
12-4
12-15
'
11-1E
12-4
12-8
12-11
12-18
1-5-88
11-30
12-18
12-22
1-4-88
1-8-88
1-19-88
'
12-14
1-8-88
1-12-88
1-15-88
1-22-88
2-2-88
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
TITLE OF PLAT:
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE:
APPLICANT
ADDRESS:
TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES:
OWNER (if not applicant)
PHONE:
' I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of
Subdivision Ordinances No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zoning Ordinance No. 261 and other
ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I
further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request for plat
approval.
' Signed........ Date:
For City Use Only:
' I hereby acknowledge receipt of the final plat application and the
application fee in the amount of $ on this the day
of 1986.
Signed: TITLE: --__-,- -- _ -
The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by
' the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinances
No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zoning Ordinance No. 261 and other ordinances, maps and
codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal.
' Shown
on Not GENERAL Plan Appl is . INFORMATION
' Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 100'
North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity
Vicinity Map
Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of ..."
Title includes City, County, State and survey name
Title includes total acreage and date of preparation
Name and address of record owner and subdivider (if different)
Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner
Standard approval block provided.
' ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200')
Unplatted property: Name of record owner with Vol. and Page of
' deed record
Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot and block
numbers, subdivision name and plat record vol. and page.
Existing zoning labeled on this tract and adjacent property
' Existing easements adjacent to this property (dashed)
City Limit lines shown, ETJ if applicable
All survey lines shown and labeled sheet 1 of 2
' Checklist cost.
' Shown
on
Not
Final Plat
Checklist cont.
Plan
App t i c .
PROPERTY INFORMATION sheet 2 of 2
Legal description of the land to include: Name of survey, POB
tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision
corner, or USGS monument, total acreage
Point of Beginning labeled on plat
'
Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and
bearings shown thereon that match legal description
Existing R.O.W. shown , labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public
streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives,
'
railroads, etc.
Utility easements: If adjacent property is unplatted, a minimum 15'
utility easement will be required along the perimeter of the plat
'
and between lots. This may be reduced to 7.5' if adjacent property
is platted and has a 7.5' utility easement adjacent to this tract.
Flood plain and flood way lines shown with dimensions and
bearings, also tied to property corners
All existing easements shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e.
drainage, utility, access, floodway, etc.
'
Existing structures shown (replats)
All corner points labeled as to pins/rods found or set with
sizes shown
PROPOSED INFORMATION
Street alignment in accordance with ordinance no. 217
Street R.O.W. dimensioned and centerline dimensioned with bearings
Street names provided not similar to any existing street names
R.O.W. dedication for existing R.O.W. widening shown and
dimensioned
Lots and blocks labeled with numbers and letters in
'
consecutive clockwise order
Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned
Building setback lines labeled
Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e.
'
schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing
acreage and calculated perimeter dimensions
Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above
Calculated dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc.
Curve data labeled (delta, length, chord length, tangent, radius)
'
Included
Not
Included
ENGINEERING PLANS
Paving and drainage construction plans (include drainage plan)
'
Water construction plans (plan only if less than 12" line)
Sewer construction plans (plan and profile)
Street lighting plan
Specifications and contracts
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Certificate of City of Southlake Tax Collector
Certificate of Tarrant County Tax Collector
'
Certificate of the Local School District Tax Collector
Deed Covenants
Homeowners Agreements and/or Documents
Developers Agreement
' SOUTHLAKE CERTIFICATION FORMATS
FORMAT FOR OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
FORM OF DEDICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL OR INDIVIDUALS
STATE OF TEXAS
' COUNTY OF TARRANT
WHEREAS, I, am the sole owner (or we, are all of the
' owners) of a tract of land situated in the Survey, Abstract , County
of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in volume page DRTCT and
more particularly described as follows:
t (insert legal description; if platted lot is reference, the recording information
should be included)
' NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT, I, , being the sole owner (or we, being all of the
owners) do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as
Subdivision (or Addition) to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas,
and I (we) do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets, (alleys, parks) and
easements shown thereon.
' WITNESS my (our) hand(s) at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the day of
, 19
no STATE OF
COUNTY OF TARRANT
' BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared ,
known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the above and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledge to me that he (they) executed the same for the
purpose and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of ,
19
' Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas
Expires
FORMAT FOR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
THIS is to certify that I, (Name), a Registered Public Surveyor of the State of
Texas, having platted the abov—e—sMdivision from an actual survey on the ground;
and that all lot corners, angle points, and points of curve shall be properly
marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by
me or under my direction and supervision.
' (Print Name) Surveyor
(SEAL) Texas Registration No.
r
FORMAT FOR OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
FORM OF DEDICATION FOR CORPORATION
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
rWHEREAS, (corporation) , acting by and through the
undersigned, its duly authorized agent, is the sole owner of a tract of land
situated in the Survey, County of Tarrant, according to the deed
recorded in volume page , DRTCT, and more particularly described as
follows:
' (insert legal description)
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
rTHAT, (corporation) , by and through the undersigned, its duly
authorized agent, does hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described
' real property as Subdivision (or Addition) to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and it does hereby dedicate to the public's use
the streets (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon.
tWITNESS MY HAND at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, this the day of
19
' (Name of Corporation)
Signed:
' Title:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
rBEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
, (office) of (corporation or partnership name) , a
' corporation (partnership), known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge to me that he executed
the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity
therein stated and as the act and deed of said corporation (partnership).
rGIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of ,
19—.
i
Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas
Expires
i
11
City of Southlake
PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURE
' For Applicants Use
' Mon:
by 5:00 p.m.
Fri:
'
Toes
7:30 p.m.
Fri:
'
by 5:00 p.m.
' Fri:
t'rues:
7:30 p.m.
1
PROCESS
Contact City Zoning clerk for applica-
tion package.
Application package received by zoning
clerk 3 weeks prior to applicable P & Z
meeting. Application must be complete
including fees, signed application forms
and required blueprints for acceptance by
the zoning clerk.
City Zoning clerk distributes plans to
staff, City Engineer and applicable utility
companies.
Review comments available at the City
Secretary's office.
P & Z meeting: Applicant should be present
to represent project.
Deadline for re -submittal of any plans
revised per P & Z reccmmendations or the City
Engineer's review letter.*
City Engineer final review comments
available.
City Council meeting: Applicant should be
present to represent project.
1) Application Form
2) Fees
3) Blueprints
1) Blueprints
_--
Preliminary Plat Approved I JPreliminaty Plat disapproved
Summit Final Plat I I Revise and re-sutmit pre-
liminary plat
* All plans hand carried to the City Engineer by the Applicant
for reasons of expediency must be stamped as received by
the City Secretary of Southlake.
' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
1987 PLAT REVIEW SCHEDULE
REVIEW FIMAL REVIEW
' SUBMITTAL C014MENTS P & Z REVISIONS COMMENTS COUNCIL
DEADLINE AVAILABLE MEETING DEADLINE AVAILABLE MEETING
1-5 1-23 1-27 1-30 2-6 2-17
' 1-19 2-6 2-10 2-13 2-20 3-3
2-2 2-20 2-24 2-27 3-6 3-17
2-16 3-6 3-10 3-13 3-20 4-7
3-2 3-20 3-24 4-3 4-10 4-21
' 3-16 4-10 4-14 4-17 4-24 5-5
4-6 4-24 4-28 5-1 5-8 5-19
' 4-20 5-8 5-12 5-15 5-22 6-2
5-4 5-22 5-26 5-29 6-5 F 16
5-18 6-5 6-9 6-12 6-19 7-7
' 6-1 6-19 6-23 7-3 7-10 7-21
6-15 7-10 7-14 7-17 7-24 8-4
' 7-6 7-24 7-28 7-31 8-7 8-18
7-20 8-7 8-11 8-14 8-21 9-1
8-3 8-21 8-25 8-28 9-4 9-15
8-17 9-4 9-8 9-11 9-18 10-E
' 8-31 9-18 9-22 10-2 10-9 10-20
9-14 10-9 10-13 10-16 10-23 11-3
In-5 10-23 10-27 10-30 11-6 11-17
' 10-19 11-6 11-10 11-13 11-20 12-1
11-2 11-20 11-24 11-27 12-4 12-15
' 11-1E 12-4 12-8 12-11 12-18 1-5-88
11-30 12-18 12-22 1-4-88 1-8-88 1-19-88
' 12-14 1-8-88 1-12-88 1-15-88 1-22-88 2-2-88
L19
' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
TITLE OF PLAT:
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES: --
' APPLICANT OWNER (if not applicant)
NAME:
' ADDRESS:
' PHONE:
I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of
' Subdivision Ordinances No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zoning Ordinance No. 261 and other
ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I
further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and
' Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request for plat
approval.
Signer Date
For City Use Only:
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the
' application fee in the amount of $ on this the day
of 1986.
Signed: TITLE:
The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by
the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinances
No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zoning Ordinance No. 261 and other ordinances, maps and
codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal.
Shown
' on Not GENERAL Plan Applic . INFORMATION
Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100', 1" =200'
North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity
Vicinity Map
Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of..."
' Title includes City, County, State and survey name
Title includes total acreage and date of preparation
Name and address of record owner and subdivider (if different)
Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner
' Standard approval block provided.
ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200')
' Unplatted property: Name of record owner with Vol. and Page of
deed record
Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot and block
numbers, subdivision name and plat record vol. and page.
Existing zoning labeled on this tract and adjacent property
Existing easements adjacent to this property (dashed)
' City Limit lines shown, ETJ if applicable
All survey lines shown and labeled
Note any previously approved concept plans or preliminary
plats on adjacent property Sheet 1 of 2
' checklist cont.
Shown Preliminary Plat
' on Not Checklist cont.
Plan Applic. PROPERTY INFORMATION Sheet 2 of 2
Legal description of the land to include: Name of survey, POB
tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision
corner, or USGS monument, total acreage
Point of Beginning labeled on plat
' Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and
bearings shown thereon that match legal description
Existing R.O.W. shown , labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public
' streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives,
railroads, etc.
Show existing traveled roadway widths with property corners
dimensioned to centerline of pavement
' All existing easements shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e.
drainage, utility, access, floodway, etc.
General outline of area embraced by tree cover
' Existing structures shown.
Utility easements: If adjacent property is unplatted, a minimum 15'
utility easement will be required along the perimeter of the plat
' and between lots. This may be reduced to 7.5' if adjacent property
is platted and has a 7.5' utility easement adjacent to this tract.
PROPOSED INFORMATION
' Street alignment in accordance with ordinance no. 217
Street R.O.W. dimensioned and centerline dimensioned
Street names provided not similar to any existing street names
' R.O.W. dedication for existing R.O.W. widening shown and
dimensioned
Lots and blocks labeled with numbers and letters in
consecutive clockwise order
Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned
Building setback lines labeled
Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e.
schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing
acreage and general perimeter dimensions
Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above
' Any proposed zoning labeled as such
Schedule addressing phasing of development with estiiiu ted
beginning and completion data for each phase
Quantitative land use schedule provided
' Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc.
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
' Drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours
in conformance with criteria in ordinance 160-A
Water improvements shown with normal pool elevation (lakes,
' ponds, stock tanks, etc.)
Drainage structures shown, i.e., dams, spillways, flumes, culverts,
etc., and noted as to size and type thereof, i.e. earth,
' concrete, riprap, metal, RCP, VCP, etc.
Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e., streams,
creeks, swales, etc.
Delineation of on and contiguous off -site drainage areas including
acreages thereof
Flood plain and flood way limits shown
Preliminary water layout showing all existing lines (with sizes)
' adjacent to the property and all proposed lines
Preliminary sewer layout
•' SOUTHLAKE CERTIFICATION FORMATS
FORMAT FOR OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
FORM OF DEDICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL OR INDIVIDUALS
STATE OF TEXAS
' COUNTY OF TARRANT
' WHEREAS, I, am the sole owner (or we, are all of the
owners) of a tract of land situated in the Survey, Abstract , County
of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in volume page DRTCT and
more particularly described as follows:
' (insert legal description; if platted lot is reference, the recording information
should be included)
I
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT, I, , being the sole owner (or we, , being all of the
owners) do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as
' Subdivision (or Addition) to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas,
and I (we) do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets, (alleys, parks) and
easements shown thereon.
' WITNESS my (our) hand(s) at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the day of
19
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANI'
' BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the above and
' foregoing instrument, and acknowledge to me that he (they) executed the same for the
purpose and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of ,
' 19 .
Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas
Expires
FORMAT FOR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
THIS is to certify that I, (Name), a Registered Public Surveyor of the State of
Texas, having platted the above s�ivision from an actual survey on the ground;
and that all lot corners, angle points, and points of curve shall be properly
marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by
me or under my direction and supervision.
' (Print Name) Surveyor
(SEAL) Texas Registration No.
FORMAT FOR OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
FORM OF DEDICATION FOR CORPORATION
STATE OF TEXAS
' COUNTY OF TARRANT
WHEREAS, (corporation) acting by and through the
undersigned, its duly authorized agent, is the sole owner of a tract of land
' situated in the Survey, County of Tarrant, according to the deed
recorded in volume page , DRTCT, and more particularly described as
follows:
t(insert legal description)
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW AIL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT, (corporation) , by and through the undersigned, its duly
authorized agent, does hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described
' real property as Subdivision (or Addition) to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and it does hereby dedicate to the public's use
the streets (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon.
' WITNESS MY HAND at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, this the day of
19
' (Name of Corporation)
Signed:
Title:
I
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
' BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
(office) of (corporation or partnership name) , a
' corporation (partnership), known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge to me that he executed
the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity
therein stated and as the act and deed of said corporation (partnership).
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of
19—.
Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas
Expires
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 9,1986
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall.
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
1. Consider:
Recommendation to Council on Zoning Map.
2. Consider:
Planning and Zoning Commissioners request to
City Council for Site Plan Review.
3. Discussion:
Standard Operating and Platting Procedures.
4. ZA 86-65.
Zoning request for a 259.989 acre tract of
land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract
522, T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706, and L.G.B.
Hall Survey, Abstract 686. Current zoning is
Agricultural, request is for the SF3 Single
Family Zoning District.
Owner: Belgian American Investments.
Public Hearing.
5. ZA 86-66.
Zoning request for a 19.64 acre tract of land
out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract 522.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for
the Retail 2 Zoning District.
Owner: Belgian American Investments.
Public Hearing.
6. ZA 86-67.
Zoning request for a 5.04 acre tract of land
out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract 522.
Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for
the Office 1 Zoning District.
Owner: Belgian American Investments.
Public Hearing.
7. ZA 86-68.
Preliminary Plat approval for a 284.669 acre
tract of land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey,
Abstract 522; L.G.B. Hall Survey, Abstract
686; and T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706.
Owner: Belgian American Investments.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bu letin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Te as, on Friday, December 5,1986 at 4 p.m.
an ra L. LeGran
City Secretary
MAME OF
MMISSIONER
o
m
o
z
cn
n
o
z
c
o
z
>
Cn
>
>
_
Z
c
<
�
"'
c
>
>
z
Cn
<
`T'
c
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 1 INDEX
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson;
Bill Stoner, Vice -Chairperson; Gary
'
Fickes. Rick Wilhelm, Ed Norman,
Jim Vorhis, Carroll McDaniel and
Martin Dunbar.
'
ABSENT: None
'
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of
Public Works; Bill LeGrand, City
Engineer, Eddie Cheatham.
'
COUNCILPERSON PRESENT: Charles
Curry.
The meeting was called to order by
toner
x
chairperson Bill Stoner. The Minutes
Fickes
x
x
of the November 25,1986 meeting were
ilhelm
x
approved as presented.
Orman
x
Vorhis
x
x
Daniel
x
Unbar
x
Stoner called attention to a draft of
a letter that would go to all property
owners who currently have light or
'
heavy commercial zoning classificatio
.
The letter is asking for their
'
response and preference to either R-1
R-2, 0-1 or 0-2 zoning in an effort
to reclassify their property so that
it will be in compliance with the new
zoning ordinance.
Carroll McDaniel commented that he
'
felt the letter would mislead persons
who are unfamiliar with the ordinance.
It was agreed upon that a copy of the
zoning classification taken from the
ordinance would be mailed along with
the letter.
Rick Wilhelm had concerns and felt
'
the letter should show that there was
no guarentee that preferences would b
'
granted as each case will be reviewed
y both P & Z and City Council.
'
IME OF
COMMISSIONER
e
r"
IT:
z
n
oz
m
z
Cn
y
z
C
-a
a
D
Cn
__3
d
Irl
�
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING CO1IMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 2 INDEX
Stoner
x
Motion was made and approved to send
tIckes
x
x
on to Council the recommendation mad
ilhelm
x
x
by P & Z on each letter received
Norman
x
requesting zoning reclassification and
orhis
x
effected by light or heavy commercial.
cDaniel
x
Dunbar
x
After discussion, motion was made
and approved to request that Council
toner
x
amend the Site Plan Ordinance No. 311,
Fickes
x
x
to allow for P & Z review of Site
ilhelm
x
Plans.
orman
(orhis
x
x
x
aniel
x
bar
x
Jim Vorhis stepped down as being a
property owner within 200' for the
'
next four items.
ZA 86-65- ZA 86-66- and ZA 86-67.
Zoning request for three tracts of
land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey,
Abstract 522, T.M. Hood Survey, Abst-
'
ract 706, and L.G.B. Hall Survey,
Abstract 686, was considered.
'
Stoner announced that the public
hearing on the three tracts of land
will be combined, however, each
tract will be voted upon separately
by Z.aning Action Number.
'
The tracts include:
259.989 acres of land AG to SF3
19.64 acres of land AG to R2
'
5.04 acres of land AG to 01
Owner of the property is Belgian
American Investments. John Levitt,
engineer, was present and answered
questions for the commission and
'
the audience.
It was established that 45 notices
were sent and six replies were
'
received by mail. The replies remai
rCITY
'
ME OF
OMMISSIONER
'
o
-=
0
z
n
"
o
-'
o
z
c°Ci�
z
C
0_0a
D
>
z
`"
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
3
'
apart of the record.
Levitt indicated that the lots are
basicly one acre or larger in size.
'
SF3 was chosen because the minimum
lot width is 100' on about 20 lots,
however, most lots would meet the
requirements of SF1. He said the
'
owners wish the houses to be a
2,500 square feet minimum.
'
It was noted by Stoner that the uppe
limit for SF3 is 21100 square feet
according to Ordinance No. 350.
He stated the R2 zoning classificati
n
will be developed in phases and
the 01 is garden type office build-
ings, developed on an as need basis.
The commercial lots is designed to
'
serve as a buffer between residential
and FM 1709.
Rick Wilhelm stated that the propose
'
Masterplan shows single family along
the north side of FM 1709 in that
area. When ask why commercial,
Levitt answered they feel there is a
'
need in that area and it would
serve as a buffer.
'
Public Hearing:
Lloyd Martinson- Commercial is
not compatable in that area. The
'
development would devalue his
property and he would lose his
privacy. He is opposed to the
commercial and office zoning.
Blaine Fergerson- stated the project
'
is compatable to Cross Timber Hills.
Residential is fine, he objects to
commercial and office.
#ME OF
COMMISSIONER
1
1
1
1
1
y
?-
o
z
cn
n
z
o
z
>
cMi�
a
d
<
v
v
C4
<
c
`r
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9 ,19E
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNC
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
TEXAS.
PAGE: 4
Jerry Black- Against commercial fc
traffic reasons, it is to dangerot
He has no problem with residential
zoning request.
Fred Joyce- He has no problem witl
the concept. He is confused over
residential SF3 in the ordinance,
with an upper limit of 2,100 squat
feet. He feels limit should be
removed from the ordinance. No
objection to office and retail zoi
John Moore- He reminded the comma
that the Citizens Select Committe(
stated that FM 1709 should not be(
a commercial strip.
Virginia Clow- no objection to
zoning.
Shelley Fergerson- Has no objecti(
to commercial an office zoning.
objection to residential.
Clarence Pinson- What about sewer<
and what a out widening of FM 170!
Hugh Sheer- Objects to commercial
on FM 1709. Residential is a
wonderful idea..
John Levitt- Stated he knows traf
was a concern however, they don't
plan commercial development for 2
years and by then FM 1709 will be
improved and the hill will be cut
down and allow Ginger Creek a bre
in the traffic. He added, commer
will bring many dollars to Southl
from sales tax.
Pam McCain- approved the concept
and a ---zoning, Southlake needs t
tax base.
PLANNING
6
IL CHAMBERS
, SOUTHLAKE,
r
S.
e
ing.
ssior
ome
)n
No
Lge
1?
-ic
•3
ik
:ial
ike
ie
INDEX
'
'
ME Or
OMMISSIONE R
T'
0
z
rn
z
v
o
z
>
Z
I
-7
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9 1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 5 INDEX
Stoner
x
After further discussion, motion was
' Fickes
Wilhelm
x
x
x
made and approved to recommend SF 3
zoning for ZA 86-65, the 259.989 acres.
Norman
x
x
Vorhis
stepped
ow
--
' McDaniel
x
Dunbar
x
ZA 86-66. Motion was made to approve
ZA 86-66
' Stoner
x
ZA 86-66 to R2.
Fickes
x
x
Wilhelm
x
x
' Norman
Vorhis
stepled
Jown
x
McDaniel
x
Dunbar
x
The item will go to council with a
tie -vote.
Stoner
x
ZA 86-67. Motion was made and approve
ZA 86-67
Fickes
' Wilhelm
x
x
to deny ZA 86-67 for 01 zoning.
Norman
x
Vorhis
step
led
own
x
McDaniel
x
x
'
Dunbar
x
ZA 86-68. The preliminary plat for
ZA 86-6f
Old Southlake Ranch, a 284.669 acre
'
tract of land was considered.
John Levitt referred to the Cheatham
'
review letter dated 12-4-86. He state
he had no problem with the items and
will correct everything with the final;
t
plat. He stated the greenbelt drain-
age easements with ponds will be main-
tained by the Homeowners Association.
Developer will landscape the greenbelt
t
area and ponds will be full all the
time.
PUBLIC HEARING
Jerry Black the drainage off the hill
will oo im out. When Kathy's Nur-
'
sery was there, it caused flooding on
his property.
'
'
JME OF
MMISSIONER
'
>
d
o
o
cn
M
n
z
r�
C
o
z
a
a
cn
a
z
C
o
--3
C
a
a
z
Cn
o
-;
a
=y
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
REGULAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
DATE: December 9,1986
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: INDEX
6
John Moore- Concerned about more
water comming on his property. He
'
is sure it will flood him out. He
wants to see a thorough hydralic
study of the property to be sure
'
area residents are not flooded out.
Levitt stated they are aware of the
drainage and will approach the problem
'
at final plat.
'
Fred Joyce- no problem with basic
concept. Has problems that he will
work out with the developer concern-
ing his own property to the north.
Lloyd Martinson- It is not cut and
dried that the State Highway Departmen
is going five lanes on FM 1709
'
according to the S.H.D. It may not all
come off his property. He is opposed
'
due to the traffic.
When asked about the greenbelt areas,
Levitt answered they are to add
character to the development. The
'
north greenbelt is not for drainage
easement. All lots above the northern
greenbelt will face_Peytonville Avenue
'
The lower greenbelt is to add characte
and have a recreation area to the
development. They will leave ponds an
tdrainage
is secondary.
Levitt also stated all of Longhorn Dr.
will be built in Phase I. It will be
'
a 84' right-of-way with streets of
curb and gutter. The developer will
not consider realigning Longhorn Drive
yWilhelm
suggested a traffic light at
Longhorn and FM 1709. He hopes that
'
Levitt will stop any additional
drainage through the property.
Stoner stated he objects to Longhorn
'
Drive and the fact that it will leave
NAME OF
OMMISSIONER
r"
0
0
0
z
o
0
0
z
y
a
d
a
~"
o
z
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
December 9 1986 DATE:
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS.
PAGE: 7 INDEX
t
North Peytonville Avenue out and also
he objects to creating a new larger
intersection at Longhorn and FM 1709.
Levitt must complete drainage study
'
before final plat comes to P Z.
He added that retension ponds should
be city owned.
Leroy McCain- No probelm with overall
' Stoner
x
plat, however, he would like to see
Peytonville as a major thoroughfare.
ickes
ilhelm
x
x
x
Motion was made to approve ZA 86-68
with drainage study for final plat
Norman
Vorhis
x
tep
ed
dowi
x
for the entire project, not phases.
McDaniel
x
' Dunbar
x
The standard operating procedures
'
and schedules were discussed.
'
Meeting was adjourned by Bill Stoner,
chairperson.
'
Re pectfully submitted
'
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
4
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
SPECIAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 18,1986
LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas
City Council Chambers of City Hall.
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
0
ZA 86-69 Zoning request for a 22.018 acre tract of
land out of the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract
1207. Current zoning is Agricultural and
A-3 Single Family Zoning District. Request
is for the Residential Estates Zoning
District.
Owner: Stephen C. Kidwell.
Public Hearing.
ZA 86-70 Preliminary Plat approval for Kidwell Addition.
The plat consists of: Tract 1; land out of the
R.D. Price Survey and being Lot 2, Hilltop Acres
Addition, containing 7.4394 acres of land. Tract 2;
land out of the R.D. Price Survey, And being Lot 1,
Hilltop Acres Addition, containing 3 acres of land.
Tract 3; land out of the R.D. Price Survey, and
being Lot 1 & 2, Block 6, Southlake Park Addition
No. 2, containing ll.5786 acres of land.
Owner: Stephen C. Kidwell.
Public Hearing.
3. ZA 86-71. Request for Special Use Permit for the Sale of
Off Premises Packaged Beer for a tract of land
described as Jellico Corner. West Southlake
Blvd. 4.39 acres of land out of the J.G.
Allen Survey, Abstract 18.
Owner: Lucky Lady Oil Co. and Jim Martin.
Public Hearing.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official
bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas, on Monday, December 15,1986 at 4 p.m.
1' 4 -
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary