1996-03-13DRAFT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
JOINT UTILIZATION COMMITTEE
Tuesday, March 13, 1996, 7:00 p.m.
Minutes
Members Present: Rick Wilhelm, Chairman; Warren Davis, School Board Representative;
Bethann Scratchard, Park Board Representative; and Michael Richarme, City
Council Representative.
Others Present: Mike Murphy, Acting CISD Superintendent, Kim McAdams, Director of
Parks and Recreation, and Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager.
Guests: John Rollins, CISD Board Member; Allen McDaniels, CISD Technology
Coordinator; and Alice Miller, CISD Director of Staff Development
Chairman Wilhelm explained the concept of joint utilization to the audience. JUC has been in
existence for several years and is a coalition between the City of Southlake and the Carroll
Independent School District. The Committee is charged with producing ideas, thoughts, and projects
that will work between the City and the District in a cooperative effort to save the citizens money.
The endeavors bring the two entities together. One example of the cooperative effort is the
gymnasium at the Carroll Middle School (paid through sales tax funds). Mr. Wilhelm explained the
"short term" and "long term" potential joint use projects lists the Committee has developed. Most
recently, the committee has been discussing communication, educational opportunities, adult
learning classes and computer communication between not only the City but the school district.
Agenda Item #1. Call to Order
Chairman Rick Wilhelm called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. A quorum was present.
Agenda Item #2. Approval of the January 9.1995 meeting Minutes
A motion was made by Michael Richarme and seconded by Bethann Scratchard to approve the
minutes as presented with corrections noted.
Agenda Item #3, Discussion - "Distance" Learning Project
Chairman Wilhelm said the point of discussion is to focus on future needs, perhaps five or more
years into the future, and what issues the City and District need to consider to bring the school and
technology together and blend it in with City uses. Some of the questions raised were: what can
these entities offer the children and citizens of Southlake; how can the library be utilized for adult
learning "after hours;" can classes be taken via the CISD's satellite connection; how is
computerization going to be used; and, can the Internet be used.
Joint Utilization Committee Meeting
March 13, 1996
Page 2
The committee members and guests gave brief introductions.
Mr. Murphy, interim District Superintendent, led the discussion and gave a brief description of the
Professional Learning Center at the Durham Elementary School and how it fits into the joint use
idea. When the Center was being designed, about two years ago, the District had a need for training
rooms and central administrative development offices. The idea evolved and thus the training rooms
and the professional resource library are housed in the Center. The Center has its own security
system enabling it to be used after hours. The District's plan for the Center is that it will be used
after regular school hours by teachers needing research, faculty development classes, and other
community education programs offered to the citizens of Southlake.
Alice Miller, Director of Staff Development for the CISD, presented information about a grant
project the District participated in this year aimed at providing mentoring services online to five
CISD teachers through the Texas Educational Network. The project was successful and will be
utilized further next year. The District realized, as a result of the project, that technology can be an
effective mentoring tool for the teachers. The District has now applied for a $250,000 TEA grant
(Projects for Educational Technologies) which would be a good vehicle to expand the District's
vision they have for staff, get funds for the kinds of technology the District wants and involve
parents. Some of the uses will be activities using online E-mail, Texas Educational Network, news
groups and a two-way interactive video, ability to tap into satellite programs and broadcast satellite
programing as well as local programming out to two school sites in the district. The District wanted
to include the City as well, but due to the limited grant funds, could not. They still envision
collaborating on community education courses. The committee asked technical questions about the
type of optics used and the cost of equipment, how the interactive video would work, etc. Mr.
Wilhelm pointed out a potential joint use for this type of programming would be for overflow City
Council meetings. Mr. Richarme asked at what point in time the District will run out of room on
their fiber optic system. Does the JUC need to start thinking about running a fiber optic line over
to the Community Center? [Note: At the last JUC meeting the committee discussed the possibility
of running an optic line from Durham Elementary to the Community Center to take advantage of the
District's educational courses] What%the timing issues? Timing is not an issue at this time -- but
to get the City involved there needs to be planning done in order to get approval from Council. The
average cost to run the line down an easement is about $10 per linear foot.
Mr. Richarme presented information about the City Council's Mid -Year Budget Review in June.
He said the Council would be discussing what to do with some of the funds coming in which were
not anticipated. He said the City has a budget forecast of about $2,000,000 in sales tax. Through
the first quarter, the City was running 60% over budget which works out to about $1.2 million over,
if the trend continues through the year. Of that $1.2 million, about $400,000 is the half -cent sales
tax which funnels in through the SPDC and joint use, etc. Richarme will take the information about
Joint Utilization Committee Meeting
March 13, 1996
Page 3
the shared fiber optic program and the suggestion to tie into the Community Center for educational
programs offered to the public to the City Council in two weeks. Easements are still an issue. Kevin
Hugman and Michael Richarme will investigate.
Mike Murphy brought out information about the District's double computer lab located in the
Durham Elementary School. He said the intent was that it would be used as an after -school training
lab. Recently the lab was used for four "test" adult education classes -- the response was tremendous
and the public requested more classes be offered. The District would like to explore a joint use with
the City and perhaps charge a minimal fee to participants to pay for cost of the after-hours training
aides. Bethann Scratchard brought out that the Parks & Recreation does not offer any classes "free;"
all have some cost with the exception of the special events such as the "Holiday in the Park"
programs. The City Parks & Recreation Department could help advertise classes, etc. Once the
District's cable access is up and running, with direct inputting onto Channel 25, the courses could
be advertised that way.
It was mentioned that much of the technology in fiber optics is infrastructure -- it will serve the
community for a long time. Some of the equipment may need to be changed periodically, but the
lines will not need any attention. The District is making sure the fiber lines are available to any new
school to interconnect with the rest of the District as will be the case with the new Rockenbaugh
Elementary School. Now is the time for the City to look ahead and see if this could be a joint use
project.
The next step for the Joint Use Committee to consider is in regards to the "Distance" Learning
Projects and the Projects for Educational Technologies Grant. They need to explore how the City
would like to participate and what the City's needs are. Bethann Scratchard recommended
incorporating the "distance" learning concept into the new Municipal Complex. The committee
needs to consider how they can make that happen. Some areas where the "distance" learning project
would be feasible is for the City to offer City -sponsored or City -run evening classes, out of the
mainstream that the CISD offers. In preparation of having the capability to tie in to the District's
system, the question was raised if the City should be putting into place regulations to require
developers (via Subdivision Ordinance) to install the conduit lines to accommodate a "community -
wide" fiber optic electronic network.
Mike Murphy summarized by saying that there are two kinds of issues: 1) the City joins the CISD
in some "short terra" kinds of plans -- what can be accessed or developed right now; 2) continue
discussions of what some "long range" plans may be. Alice Miller will provide copies of the Grant
proposal to members to help formulate what the "short term" needs of the City are. A suggestion
was to have a City-wide "technology committee" or focus group or to have a joint City -District
committee develop ideas.
Joint Utilization Committee Meeting
March 13, 1996
Page 4
The committee talked about administrative technology and how the City and District could share
some administrative functions like payroll.
Kevin Hugman commented that the City's MIS study [includes networking PC workstations] which
is being developed does not include factors which would be involved in working with the District,
but it would be easy to accomplish if the scope of services is expanded. The MIS consultant needs
to be aware of the systems the District uses so that the City's could be compatible. There are
security issues which need to be addressed.
Michael Richarme said he would like the Committee to come up with a budget to lay the fiber optic
line from Durham to the Community Center and take to City Council.
Agenda Item #4, Discussion - Future Joint Use Facilities and Agenda Item #5, Discussion - JUC
Role in Municipal Complex Planning Project
Kevin Hugman led the discussion and explained the parts the various subcommittees would play in
developing a municipal complex. He handed out a list of the Joint Use Subcommittee members.
The City will hold a city-wide kick-off meeting on March 25. Mr. Hugman handed out a draft of
the subcommittee's scope. The Joint Use Subcommittee will participate by bringing forward ideas
for possible joint uses.
The committee talked about time lines for construction of the new facility, the construction of the
Rockenbaugh Elementary School, crowd conditions at the CISD Administrative Office, the need for
meeting rooms by both the CISD and the City, and the need to involve citizens in the Joint Use
committee.
The next JUC meeting will be June 11 in the CISD board room.
Being no further discussion, a motion was made to adjourn the meeting at --- p.m.
ATTEST:
Rick Wilhelm, Chairman
Robert Glover, Vice Chairman Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City
Manager
C A WPFILESUOINTIJUCMIN03.13
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PLANNING COMMITTEE
Joint Use Planning Subcommittee
Presentation to Facility Planning Subcommittee
RECONIMENDED JOINT USES ON SITE
1) Identify areas of potential joint use of property in terms of facility uses, outdoor
uses, sharing of programs or personnel which may have an impact on facility
structure.
2) Work with the City Hall Facility Planning Subcommittee to develop a program of
intended uses on the property.
1) Potential partners and uses compatible with a City Hall complex were identified.
2) Potential joint use ideas were "clustered" into three categories based on perceived
needs of City and potential partners, potential cost savings, and feasibility of
proposed idea. The three categories were basically identified as "essential," "high
priority," and "all others."
3) The essential and high priority project uses were further defined to better capture
the intent and conceptual idea of the subcommittee in order to present their
recommendations to the facility planning subcommittee.
I I /I /7r, / ' / I /ll TXTr,, 1 /fn/IM/ I I // /
*Essential' Uses:
1) City Hall Complex
2) CISD Administrative Offices
3) Joint Meeting Rooms/Board Rooms
Conceptual idea of Facility.
* Should be one building which would house City and CISD administrative
functions, and include space for Chamber of Commerce;
* auditorium style Council Chambers/Board of Trustees/Board meeting room in
middle of building;
* Building design and structure should allow for sharing of copier room/print shop,
purchasing office, human resources functions, finance functions, reception area,
computer mainframe, public information functions, facility maintenance, etc.
* Convenience and access to citizens;
* CISD Administrative function is a compatible use with City Hall;
* CISD will have to buy land/build a facility to service the needs of 11,000 +
students;
* Proposed joint use will allow sharing of like functions between City and CISD,
resulting in cost savings to both;
* There is a critical shortage of meeting rooms now -- complex can be sized and
designed to allow maximum flexibility at lower cost than constructing a separate
CISD facility;
* one complex will provide a central "drawing" feature to citizens;
* Scheduling and coordination of facilities can be done easier.
Wigh Priority' Uses:
1) Fine Arts Center
* separate building but combine with an open air amphitheatre;
* incorporate trails, "Heritage Center," pond into design;
* performing arts center should be compatible with school facilities;
* "End of the Runway" type theater -- small (200-450 seat) which would provide
facilityfor:
amateur/semi-professional productions, UIL 1 act plays, Lake Cities
Community Band, Girl Scouts/Boy Scouts programs, Elementary/Middle
School drama productions, etc.;
2)
3)
Conference/Convention Center
* facility uses would include banquets, adult education classes, staff development
training, rental of facility to outside organizations, etc.
* could include meeting rooms for organizations such as Keep Southlake Beautiful,
Sister Cities, other community based organizations;
* rooms designed for flexibility of use and size;
* room rental could provide source of revenue;
* include banquet facilities.
Technology Center/Communications Center
* Facility include library
* Provide facilities for media room/audio-visual center, data center and computer
labs, telecommuting capabilities, language labs.
-Other -Potendd Uses Identified by Subcommittee
Senior Center
Heritage Center with log cabin
Museum
staff development center
recreational facility
Warehouse for bulk office items
Nature Center
Community Education Center
Joint Data Center
Justice of the Peace / Court and offices
County Commissioner Offices
State Representatives/Senator Offices
Signature Feature/Plaza
Arboretum
Tower Clock
Potential Joint Personnel/Programs
* Public information/relations
* Human resources / Insurance
* Printing Department/Copy Center
* Risk Management
* Reception Area
* Building Maintenance
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The needs enumerated in this section result from analysis of data, application of standards, citizen
input and consultation of City staff, the Parks and Recreation Board and the Planning and Zoning
Commission. The emphasis is on land and facilities needed to serve the City's population in the year
2001 and with the build -out population.
Administrative Actions 1992 to 1996
The following administrative actions were outlined in the 1992 plan and the accomplished
information will be carried forward in this plan for historical data. Accomplishments:
1992
January Adopted the first Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
March First recreation staff hired & recreation programs offered
1993
February A City/ School Joint Utlization Committee was appointed by City Council and CISD
School Board
November Citizens approved a'/2 cent sales tax increase dedicated to park development
1994
January Citizens group formed that planned and raised funds to build the first community
built playground
June City acquired 24 acres of land to expand Bicentennial Park
June Joint -Use Agreement approved for the CMS Gym/Recreation Center Facility
July Developer donated and will construct a seven acre public neighborhood park in the
Lonesome Dove Subdivision
October City awarded construction contract to Ridgemont for $800,000 to build the first
major joint -use facility at CMS, a Gymnasiun/ Recreation Center, office, activity
room and restrooms
October City awarded construction contract to Dean Construction for $1.8 million to build the
phase I expansion of Bicentennial Park, four lighted baseball fields, five soccer
fields, restrooms, concession stand, pavilion, maintenance building, and new entrance
off of FM 1709
November Developer donated five acres for a neighborhood public park in the Country Walk
Subdivision and next to the Carroll Elementary School, undeveloped, four practice
backstops
December City acquired 80 acres of land for a future City park on N. White Chapel and south
of Bob Jones Road
all
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
1995
February Developer opened a public/private 18 hole golf course on Big Bear Creek in
Southlake, Timarron Golf Course
August Trail System Master Plan was adopted by City Council, including off -road hike and
bike trails, on road bike routes, and equestrain trails
Southlake Women's Club donated readerboard sign for the FM 1709 Bicentennial
Park entrance.
September Adventure Alley Community built playground was completed with $144,000 in cash
donations, $66,000 of in -kind donations from 106 businesses and 16,640 hours of
volunteer labor.
October CMS Joint -use Gym / Recreation Center construction was completed and dedicated
October City established a Parks and Recreation Department with a Director who is under the
direct supervision of the City Manager
1996
March Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I was completed and dedicated
April Council selects Bob Jones Park as name for new City Park on North White Chapel
and Bob Jones Road
21
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
D R A F T Administrative Actions 1996 to 2001
Land Acquisition
Land acquisition of all future park land is the highest priority of this plan. Land costs continue to
escalate and it must be the City's priority to assure adequate parks and open space is preserved in
perpetuity for the future citizens of Southlake. Land is needed for the following:
• Complete acquisition of Bob Jones Park and lease COE land for adjacent park use
• Acquire additional land at Bicentennial Park
• Acquire a community and special purpose park site in the south and southwestern area of
Southlake
• Work with developers to acquire land and right-of-way dedications for the Trail System
Master Plan
• Work with developers and the citizens to assure that every neighborhood has access to
neighborhood park facilities
• Acquire land to develop Joint -use School/ Parks at existing and future schools with CISD,
KISD and NWISD to address community and neighborhood park needs.
Linear Parks
The Trail System Master Plan implementation is of the highest priority to the citizens of Southlake.
Grant opportunities must be pursued to help develop the trail plan. The City must work with
developers to acquire land and to develop the trails. The Thoroughfare Plan is now being updated
and needs to include right -a -way to meet the Trail System Master Plan. All opportunities need to
be aggressively pursued.
Open Space
Open space is defined in two ways. First, open space is land that could have been developed with
houses or commercial buildings but was not and was set aside as open space, such as golf courses,
ballfields, ponds, greenbelts, etc. The second definition is specific to a standard for Southlake Open
Space. Open space was a high priority of the citizens and as Southlake develops more it is
becoming a higher priority. This plan states that Southlake will commit 50% of all its public park
land inventory to remain non -impacted open space. Open space in this definition will not include
golf courses or organized athletic fields. It will include ponds, greenbelts, nature areas, open playing
fields, woodlands, grasslands, etc and can only be impacted by a trail.
22
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
City Parks
Development of a City Park will take several phases as funding becomes available. The first phase
needs to include lighted game fields for soccer and practice fields for all sports. Other facility needs
for this park include nature areas, trails, local use amphitheatre and equestrian facilities. The citizens
expressed a desire for an open air covered arena for horses and other livestock activities.
Public/private partnerships need to be developed to provide additional equestrian related facilities
at this site. The master planning process is now underway for this park and is projected to be
completed in August 1996.
Community Parks
Phase II expansion of Bicentennial Park was planned for 1996 but due to limited funding will now
be programmed for 1997. The facility needs include a ten foot wide hike and bike concrete trail, an
outdoor basketball court, in -line hockey court, a realigned entrance at North White Chapel, a road
extension through the park, additional practice fields, and special use issues that community groups
will fund but need to be planned and designed for in the Bicentennial Park master plan. Community
groups have expressed desire for batting cages and storage areas which they'will raise money to
build. This master plan is now underway and is projected to be completed in August 1996.
Special Purpose Parks
Land needs to be acquired for a tennis center and aquatic/fitness center. The Southlake Tennis
Association is the next largest user group behind the youth sport associations. The construction of
the first phase of a tennis center is projected at $1.5 million, not including land. The second special
purpose facility - the aquatic/fitness center - should be built following the tennis center. For shared
parking and possible joint -use the aquatic/fitness center should be in conjunction with CISD and /
or KISD.
Joint Use Facilities
The community is extremely favorable of getting full use of public school facilities and not
spending the tax dollar "twice." Joint city/school facilities should continue to be aggressively
pursued. The school/city facilities need to be designed, developed and managed for maximum
public use during all hours of the day. In Southlake the large population of stay at home parents and
flexible work schedules allows for much of the adult population the opportunity to recreate during
school hours. Public recreational facilities need to be available during the typical school hours. This
includes a range of facilities from tennis courts to gymnasiums to libraries where the public needs
access during school hours. Options need to be explored on how faciliites can be available to the
public during a wide range of hours.
23
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
Recreation Programs
The community recreation programs ranked as a high priority with the citizens in the focus groups.
Continuous recreation programs began in March of 1995 and have continued to grow. Programs
have expanded from Senior citizens to teens to preschoolers. Sport leagues are now available for
indoor soccer and in -line hockey. Two program brochures are mailed to all residents annually, one
in September for Fall/ Winter/Spring and one in April for Summer programs. A full time Recreation
Supervisor is employed by the Parks and Recreation Department and as the programs continue to
grow staff will need to be added. Southlake is partnering with the area City Parks and Recreation
Departments of Colleyville, Keller and Grapevine to expand our services. A partnership with CISD
is planned for the Fall 1996 to offer adult education classes to our residents. Teen programming
needs to be a high priority for the Department. In keeping with the 1992 goal number two objective
number three of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan the City is continuing to expand
its recreational programming options to the public.
Library Access
The focus groups were in favor of more access to library services. This plan recommends that the
city consider a joint library with neighboring cities and/or consider joint -use of an existing school
or future school library for evening research usage. The current use of the City of Grapevine Public
Library for our citizens use is appreciated but it is overcrowded. The citizens of Southlake recognize
the benefits of a shared facility with pooled resources so more money can be spent on books and
technology and less on overhead, maintenance and personnel.
Neighborhood Parks
Continue to work with developers to provide neighborhood park facilities to their residents. Explore
opportunities with developers and the homeowner associations to allow limited public access to
neighborhoods without neighborhood park facilities. The, critical issue is that each of the ten
neighborhood zones have access to neighborhood park facilities. Implementation of the Trail
System Master Plan is necessary so that residents can access their neighborhood parks safely.
24
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IN PRIORITY ORDER
1996 - 1998
1. Implement the Trail System Master Plan as grants, money and land become available.
2. Acquire all future park land needed for the ultimate build -out
3. Maintain 50% open space of public park inventory
4. Expand and develop recreation programs for all ages
5. Build a full size outdoor In -Line Hockey Rink
6. Build outdoor basketball courts
7. Expand practice fields for soccer/ baseball and softball
1998-2001
1. Enter into a joint partnership to build a public tennis center
2. Enter into agreements with school districts to build an indoor swimming pool/ fitness center
3. Continue to meet the needs of youth and adult athletic organizations for competition and
practice fields
4. Develop joint agreements to improve access to library services
5. Continue to expand on joint -use school/park facilities with emphasis on public access during
school hours
6. Develop a local use outdoor amphitheater & / or bandshell
7. Build a joint -use multi -purpose arena that is available for 4-H, FFA, Rodeo Clubs and
Equestrian Clubs.
8. Develop an outdoor swimming pool for families and teenagers.
2001 to 2011
The following were identified as future recreation facilities that are needed. Due to limited funds
priority for these are noted as anticipated future needs that will need to be reevaluated in the year
2000 review and update of the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.
1. Need for a public golf course
2. Need for an arts center
3. Need for a school/city multi -use athletic facility
4. Need for more neighborhood park facilities
25
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
Priority List Comparison
Citizen survey 1995
Focus Group 1/25/96
Focus Group1/29/96
Priority 2/26/96
City Trail
City Trail
Open Space
Now to 2 years: City Trail''
Outdoor BB Court
Library Access
City Trail
Open Space
Rec/ Fitness Ctr
Prog. Teens
Ed. Nature Center
Acquire Park Land
Senior Ctr
Prog. Seniors
Prog. Teens
Recreation Programs
Tennis Courts
Prog. Adults
Prog. Children
In -Line Hockey Rink
Indoor Swimming
Prog. Children
Prog. Seniors
Outdoor Basketball'
Public Golf Course
MU Athletic Fields
Prog. Adults
2to 5 years:Tennis Center
Amphitheater
JU Gyms/Parks
TL Tennis Ctr
Indoor Pool/Fitness Ctr
Equestrian Center
Passive Rec Areas
Library Access
MU Athletic Fields
Lg Family/SE Park
MU Athletic Fields
Library Access
TL Tennis Ctr
Public Golf Course
JU Gyms/Parks
MP Fitness Ctr
Outdoor Amphit
Amphitheater
Open Space
Passive Rec Areas
MU Livestock Arena
Neighborhood Park
Arts Center
Outdoor Swimming Pool
Outdoor Pool
Equestrian Ctr
5'to 10'years: Golf Course
Outdoor Amphit
MP Football Stadi
Arts Center
Public Golf
Neighborhood Park
MU Stadium
Arts Center
JU Gyms/parks
Neighborhood Parks
Ed Nature Ctr
Lrg Family/SE Park
Ice Rink
Equestrian Ctr
MP Fitness Ctr
Family YMCA
Ice Hockey Rink
Outdoor Pool
Ice Hockey Rink
Family YMCA
**Focus Group 1/29/96 added Acquire park land for future use #2 and In -line Hockey Court #9 . Focus Group 1/25/96 removed YMCA and MU
Football Stadium from list stating it was not a function of the City.
26
Draft May 21, 1996 Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
Facilities Summary
Facilities
Number
Existing -
1996
Number
needed for
2001
Standards
by Build-
out
Recommended
Facilities by
Build -out
Playgrounds
6
16-24
12
Picnic Tables
20
80
195
195
Shelters
2
5
10
10
Competitive Baseball/Softball Fields
9
11
12-20
17
Competitive Soccer/Football Fields
6
12
12-24
17
Tennis Courts
8
10
20-33
16
Multi -use courts
1
4
16-24
10
Tennis Center
.5
1
1
Aquatic/Fitness Center
1
1
Recreation Center
JU-2
1
1
Senior Center
1
1
Golf Course
1
1
Equine/livestock Arena
.5
1
1
Fishing Peir
I
1
1
Nature Center
1
1
Performing Arts Center
1
1
Swimming Beach
1
1
1
Trails Miles:
Nature (unpaved)
Hike & Bike (concrete 6' to 12')
Equestrain
On -road bike routes
27
g
Q
H
0 C
U
c
o
�
rA °
c
�
on
z
��
°
0
cqs
3
UCA
U 'p,
O
U
Cd cd
,,
O r O
U p G.
p
°' 0
U
y
C
E a
6�9
yQ :oCd
Cd
by
p
b0 7.
[..�
N
O
Q� p
U
�Cd
$
COa�0i
.$'
a a
cn
O
w
'�
i
n
i
v
C aD
Ocn
�
0 U
p
a
O
O
O g
b4
a U
«j
y
y
Q .A
E
CIO,
0
CcUE�
E
,�� o
a
o
to
on
v
03
-14
Q
a* >
U
w
0
0-4
y
Cd
b
Cq
�
�
3
W
A
o
cd
"0
o
o
z
o
H
U
.w
O
,�
Q
v
O
—
^- ?
o
`"
w
>
�I
a
A
A 0
O C
w U
IU
cd
U
C
N
a0i
U o
g
U04
S. 0N
,a
Cd
to w
a�
c
_
U
cd�.
U
oa
f. U
�a
x
0-4
%
;
o
U
U
t
U
0
a�
ZCCd
o
o
U
E
E
.-
CA
Q GO
U 0
U
ri
�
°
d
N
M
06
ao
b
� bA
O >
V
w 'L7 p 09
0
O •�
U
O `r
�
•� a� � .r
�
a0i
C Q O
y CAc�
c
U bp4 E CI
as
-�
O Cd
-0 E
� 2.
3
.Se
'w
C. O �
rA V1 N
EL. p
'C •--
U '� O
c .�
co
w w
c
bb
O
3>
O
.� o
O
O
cd
`q
p
g
0 o 0o
(
4boq
60q
�. ,0 a
a, o
CO
bQ
r- CC
y CC
CO
00
U
r.
y
V
CA
U
N b0
�6R 0�
C
0cqs
y >�
�
G
CC
U s° c.
U Cw
v)
Q
Q
E
a�
b
3
c
a�
a
v
i
V1
a+
w
E
N
C.
C
�
b4
-•
y
El
2
by
ca
�
r .
cr.
r—i
�
cd
rz
•b
by
U
~'
U
E
r
Cd
r
Cid
._..
O
O
cd
p
►.
cd
.
E
a
U
bp
cd
_Abo
p
by
cd
to
« S
C
�
ti
ti
U
U)
U
O
rM
N
—4
M
W;
.--4
�
1-4
.--�
brio
a
g
T
14
z
0
F
O
F
Q
O
a
a
0
U
S
U
C3
�
c
to
-d
O
O
U
S
WF
a�
1-4
>
a�
to
Q
6-4
CTJ
a,
A
O1.
w
�.
cc
to �
x
>%
cc
a
E
$
co
�
�°
a.
°
c
a
ri C7
U
U
a
U
O
C
F
w
z
�--�
N
M
M
0
to
co
a