1989-11-07 CC Packet ( CITY )
r11 GOODE AIRPORT ENTERPRISES . INC .
1 953 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD.
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092
10- 1 -89 481 -3678
Ogg-7M
de
SOUTHLAKE CITY MAYOR OCT ' 1989
6£7 N. CARROLL ROAD
MSOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 OFFICE OF
CITY SECRETARY
IDEAR HONORABLE MAYOR GARY FICKES :
WHILE AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DISCUSSING THE ADDITION OF
HE "CONTINENTAL JOINT VENTURES" HOUSING PROJECT JUST SOUTH
OF GOOLE AIRPORT I BECAME AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE LAST CHANGE
ri I;a THE ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY WAS IN SLIGHT ERROR.
THE NORTHERN FOR l ON OF THE AIRPORT HAS BEEN IN THE CITY FOR A
. i1_'iBER OF YEARS . THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE AIRPORT HAS BEEN IN
THE COUNTY UP U -T I L THE TIME EOUTHLAKE REACHED OUT AND TOOK IT
• r.RING THE LAST ANNEXATION ) .
difT AF FE A R THAT THERE HAS E EEN A SLIGHT 0 .ERS : H T WHEN. THE NEW
v. .`. _ ' t-' ' - - THA• : IS , THE FORT I ON i H. WAS IN COUNTY
- L'_ HAVEADDEDTHE EXISTING CITY FORT . O N THE P. RF OFT .
E1 I EVE THAT THE I T Y MAP SHOULD ,HOW THE Al RP 'R : IN I T S 'TRUE E'C.^LE
AT ANYONE CONCERNED ABOUT THE A 1 RFORT COULD GET A REALISTIC
: TYRE OF THE A. I RF _ RT - 17E•
-
i _ ' eSE CH-.NOE THE ZONING OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE Al R'FOR T TO
r F _ ` TO THE NORTHERN PORT • _ N . THE ZONING SHOULD BE I NE HEIR A.L
_ !< TEA- OF AGR I CC -TURA:'_.
: N A FEW YEARS FAST I DEEDED i DEED OF TRUST ) ALL OF THE LAND FROM FARM TO
Al t'.PRKET 1709 TO CONTINENTAL BLVD AS AIRPORT LAND TO THE TARRANT COUNTY TAX
EF'ARTMENT. THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WHICH
GAVE PROPERTY TAX RELIEF TO PRIVATE AIRPORTS WHICH WERE OPEN TO THE
FL'BL I C-- - 1 F THEY WOULD STAY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR AT LEAST A PERIOD OF TEN
YEARS. I AM COMPLYING WITH THE TEXAS LAW AND AM USING THIS PROPERTY FOR
THE AIRPORT.
r/ THE AIRPORT PROPERTY EXTENDS FROM FM 1 709 ALL OF THE WAY TO CONTINENTAL
EL VD. - -PLEASE ADJ UST THE CITY ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY .
A
FEEL FREE TO CALL ON ME IF YOU DESIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
NC ERELY .
(kW S - - -
I:(�E. GOODE
fy� J ,� r' ' RESTRICTIONS--GOODE AIRPORT
C�� NOW, THEREFORE, know all men by these presents, that the under-
signed , ROBERT G. GOODE, hereinafter called "undersigned ," being the owner
of the real property situated in Tarrant County, Texas, and being more fib
particularly described by the legal descriptions of the properties listed
cobelow, has caused said property to be located and recorded in Volume ,
Page , Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, which is also incorpo amtgdl
by reference for all purposes herein. 2000 307549 3 01/f8i ti
For the purpose of complying with PROPERTY TAX CODE SUBCHAPTER G.
APPRAISAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORT PROPERTY of the STATE OF TEXAS let it be r
known that GOODE AIRPORT, a privately owned OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, PUBLIC
AIRPORT is restricted in accordance with above mentioned SUBCHAPTER G to .
claim restricted use valuation for public access airport property.
The undersigned , the owner of a fee simple estate of 57 .733 acres
agrees to limit the use of that property as described below as airport
property accessible to the public for a period of 10 years beginning from
the date of registration of this document with the Tarrant County Clerk--
the property being located in Tarrant County. The Airport Property being
used soley as a public access airport property during the term of the deed
restriction;
(1) Being 20 .77 acres of land out of the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract NI
500, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded Feb 10, 1Q67 in Vol 4359, Pg. 195 of
the Records of said County.
(2) Being 19.005 acres out of a 31 .816 acre tract of land out of the r
T. J. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABST. #1502, Tarrant County, Texas and being a
portion of a 87 acre tract as recorded. on Pg. 153 of Vol 64 in the Tarra
County Deed Records .
(3) Being 9.958 acres of land out of the Northern most 30 acres of that
certain 40 acre tract described iri"Deed dated Jan. 6 , 1021 from A. F. Whit
et ux, to Sallie J. Taylor as recorded in Book 1238, Pg. 585, of the
Records of Tarrant County, Texas. %r
r (4) Being 8 .00 acres of land that was deeded to Frank White by A.F.White
err' on April Rth, 1948, and recorded in Vol . 1992, on Pg. 380, Deed Records,
r
Tarrant County, Texas, Filed April //15, 1048 . i
iii
DATED this day of\Jfl?✓ 1083.
gP` 6_ L
R. G. Goode
STATE OF TEXAS L
COUNTY OF TARRANT
BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County
and State, on this day personally appeared ROBERT G. GOODE known to me to b
the Person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and
adknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expresses and in the capacity therein stated .�� ..•.., `'- CIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the
L
day off'./ % , 1983.
•
�� Notary P lic n nd for
T County, Texas• • � arran
*or the date that the above said properties are entered into the
restricted tax program.
Cifill
YC1 743$ PArE•, a6
J so
RESTRICTIONS-GOODE AIRPORT -- no pages follow mr
v
Trinity River Authority of Texas t(pe
r :
Northern Region Office
4
3156.100/.100.700
November 3, 1989
4
Mr. Curtis Hawk
City Manager
City of Southlake
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Mr. Hawk:
Subject: Central Regional Wastewater System
City of Southlake
Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Line S-6
As you are aware, the Authority has received a request from you to permit
the diversion of wastewater flows from an area within the Denton Creek
Regional Wastewater System service area, on an interim basis, to the
Central Regional Wastewater System service area. You have proposed
construction of a pipeline system extending from the Summerplace Wastewater
"WI Treatment Plant to the Authority's proposed Big Bear Creek Interceptor
,, Extension Project, to be completed in late 1989, in order to accomplish
this interim diversion and you have requested that the Authority assist the
City of Southlake by financing this pipeline system, hereinafter referred
to as Line S-6.
Authority Management has since reviewed your requests and has determined
that we can likely facilitate your needs subject to a number of approvals,
s required by the nature of our existing Central Regional Wastewater System
and Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System Service Contracts with your
city. The interim diversion request is very similar to a previous
diversion request initiated by the City of Keller in 1985. The precedent
established with this diversion has been utilized for the purpose of
preparing an agreement, a copy of which is enclosed. Due to provisions
within the Central Regional Wastewater System and Denton Creek Regional
'' Wastewater System Service Contracts with your city, it will be necessary
for the System Advisory Committees to convene and review and approve the
interim diversion concept prior to Authority Management making a
a recommendation on this matter to our Board of Directors. It is therefore
very important that a representative of the City of Southlake be on hand at
each of these meetings to support your request. The following dates have
been established for these meetings:
41 Cy
PO Box 240
Arlington. Texas 76010
(817) 467-4?23
f� i
I
bi
3156.100/. 100.700
November 3, 1989
CURTIS HAWK
Page 2
Central Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee Meeting
When: November 13, 1989
Where: Central Regional Wastewater System Administration Building
Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System Advisory Committee Meeting
When: November 21, 1989
Where: Trinity River Authority of Texas General Office 60,
Subsequent to these meetings and assuming that your City Council approves
the Interim Diversion Agreement in November 7, 1989 Council action, the
Agreement will be presented in our December 6, 1989 meeting for our Board ''
of Directors consideration.
A financing agreement has been prepared by our Bond Counsel , McCall ,
Parkhurst and Horton, which will serve to facilitate the Authority's
financing, design, construction, and inspection of Line S-6. It is
understood that the City of Southlake intends to acquire all necessary
land rights required for the construction of Line S-6. Furthermore, it is
understood that the City of Southlake wishes to initiate engineering
associated with Line S-6, the costs for which will be borne by the City of
Southlake and subsequently reimbursed by the Authority following the
Authority's issuance of Revenue Bonds for Line S-6 in our February 1990
Board of Directors meeting. This obligation for reimbursement is
guaranteed only to the extent of our ability to issue bonds, which our rw,
inability to do so is not recognized at this time. Essentially, title to
the city funded engineering work product will rest with the City of
Southlake until such time as the Authority is in position to purchase this
work product with bond proceeds. Finally, the financing agreement has 116,
been prepared in the format of an Installment Sale Agreement with title to
Line S-6 and operation and maintenance responsibilities for Line S-6
passing to the city upon the completion of construction and the placing r►
into service of the Line S-6.
The enclosed Ordinance, together with the Notice of Public Hearing, has
been prepared based upon the first reading and adoption of the Ordinance
occurring on November 7, 1989, the second reading and adoption of the
Ordinance occurring on November 21, 1989, and the publication of a Notice
of Public Hearing in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on or before November 11,
1989. I will plan on attending the November 7, 1989 Council Meeting to
discuss the Ordinance and the Interim Diversion Agreement although I will
3156.100/.100.700
November 3, 1989
CURTIS HAWK
Page 3
also be attending the Colleyville Council Meeting on November 7, 1989 to
discuss matters relating to wastewater service. I will bring 15 original
copies of the Ordinance for execution, subsequent to the November 21 second
'� reading of the Ordinance, by the Mayor, the City Secretary, and the City
Attorney. In the interim, if I may be of assistance to you, please call .
.ri S. erely,
di
WAYN K. HUNTER, P.E.
Manager of Development
dis /mek
Attachments
cc: Robert R. Stevens, Manager, Wastewater Services Planning
Mike Barnes, Director of Public Works, City of Southlake
0
r
4
1
di
4
di
I
di
rr
IMO fir+
w
;,
11/
Oct . 6, 1989 ito
Southlake Service Reliability
Service reliability should be increasing in Southlake due to
recently completed projects as well as planned future projects .
Recently completed projects are as follows :
1 . The long span on Southlake Blvd at Short Street was
replaced with taller poles , larger conductor and
wider phase spacing. This has eliminated lengthy
outages due to the conductor slapping together and
burning down.
2 . The recloser on Kimball Rd. north of Hwy 114 has been
relocated to north of Dove Rd. This should have
eliminated the "sympathy trips" that the Southlake
residents have experienced.
116
3 . The Southlake area has been reviewed by engineering to
ensure proper fuse coordination . The areas which
required new fuses have been installed. This should
1111, ensure proper fault clearing.
4 . The feeder from Grapevine Ball St . Substation has been
essentially stripped of all load except for Southlake. ilk
Therefore, Southlake has an express feeder which
should result in fewer interruptions from outside the
city.
Planned future projects include constructing a three phase ,
circuit from Kimball to Carroll along the south side of Hwy 114.
Various switches and a recloser are to be installed. This aft
installation will provide the following benefits :
1 . Less exposure - the area on Carroll from south of the
city hall to north of Hwy 114 is presently served from
along Southlake Blvd. This area will be served from the :.
new circuit in a shorter path with less exposure .
ihr
2. Separated load - the new construction will split a large
area of load from the feeder along Southlake Blvd. This
should result in less interruptions . The area along
Hwy 114 should essentially be electrically separated
from Southlake Blvd except for the main feeder to the '
substation . Therefore, faults or interruptions in one
area should not affect the other area.
a
ill
3. Alternate feed - should a major problem now arise
between Kimball and Carroll on either Hwy 114 or
ii Southlake Blvd, it will be possible to switch and
provide service to the area west of Carroll in a
minimum of time. Prior to the construction, the
di problem causing the interruption would have had to
be corrected prior to restoring service.
1
This project is nearing completion of engineering design. A
Ai verbal highway department approval was secured today. It is
estimated that the project will be authorized in approximately
two weeks . Construction will require approximately three weeks .
ni Therefore, it is anticipated that this construction will be
completed prior to November 15 , 1989.
di Additional projects are presently being analyzed to improve
Southlake service reliability.
1
di
1 c
ed
1
di
ei
i
w
s
it ' W
f
1
PROCEDURES/TIMETABLE FOR ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES
STEP ONE: Appoint a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee.
This Committee advises and assists the City in
adopting Land Use Assumptions and a Capital
Improvements Plan; monitors the implementation of the
Capital Improvements Plan and advises and assists the
City on updating the Land Use Assumptions, Capital
Improvements Plan and impact fees. This Committee
will also assist in determining the different service
areas which will be charged impact fees and
developing a map of these areas.
STEP TWO: Adopt a resolution establishing a public hearing date
to consider Land Use Assumptions. This resolution
can be adopted on the same date that the Council
appoints the Advisory Committee.
STEP THREE: Make available for public inspection the proposed
Land Use Assumptions, the time period of projections
and a general description of the nature of capital
improvement facilities that are proposed. This is
basically the City's prediction on how the City will
grow, what capital improvements are necessary to
support the growth and over what period of time the
City is predicting such growth to take place. These
predictions will form the basis for the final
adoption of the impact fees. This data must be
prepared prior to sending the notice set out in Step
Four.
STEP FOUR: Send notice of the public hearing on adoption of the
Land Use Assumptions. Any person who has requested
written notice of the hearing is entitled to thirty
(30) days mailed written notice. In addition, the
City must publish notice of the hearing once a week
for three consecutive weeks at least thirty (30) days
but no more than sixty (60) days before the date of
the public hearing. There are additional publication
requirements that are set forth in the statute.
STEP FIVE: Hold a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions.
STEP SIX: Adopt an ordinance or resolution approving the Land
Use Assumptions within thirty y (30) days after the
date of the public hearing.
STEP SEVEN: Complete a Capital Improvements Plan and make it
available to the public for inspection. The plan
must be prepared prior to sending the notice set out
in Step Eight.
1
•
STEP EIGHT: Send notice of hearing on the proposed Capital
Improvements Plan and impact fee. As with the Land
rr Use Assumptions, the City must mail thirty (30) days
written notice to any person who has requested such
notice and in addition, must publish notice of the
hearing once a week for three consecutive weeks at
least thirty (30) days but not more than sixty (60)
days before the public hearing.
STEP NINE: The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee must file
its written comments on the proposed Capital
Improvements Plan and impact fee at least six (6)
business days before the date of the public hearing.
STEP TEN: The City Council adopts by ordinance or resolution
the Capital Improvements Plan and impact fee within
"r thirty (30) days of the date of the public hearing.
NOTE: The Capital Improvements Plan and Land Use
Assumptions may be adopted at the same public hearing
if the City so desires. The same procedural steps
are required, except that a combined notice may be
provided.
di
STEP ELEVEN: If the City desires to amend the Land Use
4 Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan or impact fee,
a new public hearing requiring the same procedural
steps is required.
STEP TWELVE: The City must update the Land Use Assumptions and
Capital Improvements Plan at least every three (3)
years. In lieu of updating the Land Use Assumptions,
Capital Improvements Plan or impact fee, the City may
determine that no update is necessary. The City must
comply with similar procedural steps and hold a
public hearing in order to make this determination.
c:\slake\impact. 01
a
-2-
City of South lake,Texas
MEMORANDUMflor
November 3 , 1989
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary
SUBJECT: Polling Place for Municipal/School Election
In an effort to gather facts in regards to the location of
the polling place for the Spring General Elections, on
October 20 , 1989 , the Election Judge, Charles Curry;
Alternate Judge, Aloha Payne; Councilmember Sally Hall and
myself met with Mr. John Lowrey and Joyce Rogers, to discuss
the possibility of the city sharing a common place with the
school district for the general election. We shared some of r,
our common concerns on the subject and attempted to work out
some of those concerns.
We walked through the building which would be available to ilb
the city, should you vote to have a joint polling place.
Charles Curry and Aloha Payne are going to make a report on
the findings from their view point as election judge and
alternate judge. Councilmember Sally Hall will also be able
to inform you on the findings.
If I can answer any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me.
60
i
SELL/s
r
it
3 November 1989
•
(or Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
•
Concerning the holding of City Elections at the Carroll School site.
• Having spent a great deal of time thinking about this situation, I
have come to the conclusion that I will serve wherever the Mayor
and Council Members feel necessary. But, if I had my choice I would
•
like to stay where we are.
•Convenience is probably the most important. Our records are
at City Hall, the voting booths are at the Fire Station.
Everything would have to be carted over to the school building
• and back. Someone will have to be paid to do this. Now, our
City Secretary has a place to work in privacy, while standing by
to help. Over at the school building, she would be back in some
storeroom with a desk and a lot of boxes to keep her company.
•The place offered by the School officials is dark, smells of
cigarette smoke, and is a potential bottleneck with one small
entry. It is a "hole in the wall". Workers at the polls stay from
•r 6:00-6:30 a.m. until at least 9:00 p.m., sometimes later. We are
not allowed to leave the area until the votes are counted.
Couldn't we offer pleasant surroundings for those who do the
dr work? I don't know whether anyone noticed, but the building
has no windows, antiquated plumbing...from the stand point of
the worker, not pleasant and not convenient.
•True this would be a method to simplify voting for the
citizens of Southlake. My feelings in regards to that is if a
person is truly interested in executing his/her right to vote,
he/she will drive the extra mile to do it. What we are
encouraging is a confusion of the issues.
Please consider very carefully before making a final decision in this
matter. Should your decide to go ahead with the school building,
,• please make it temporary, so that the decision can be reassessed at a
future date.
iro
• Sinperel o
de
Aloha Payne, O
Alternate Election Judge
"' '' City of Southlake
MEMORANDUM
November 3 , 1989
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Charles Curry, Election Judge
SUBJECT: Joint Polling Places for General Elections
On the surface, the idea of consolidating the polling places
for City Council and School Board elections sounds good. r1
From an operational stand point, it is not so good. There
are several reasons why I feel this way.
1) There are four School Districts within the city limits
of Southlake. Northwest, Grapevine-Colleyville, Keller and
Southlake. This in itself would create confusion as to
voting.
2) The facilities being offered by Carroll Independent
School District are not adequate for the needs of the
election, ie, restroom facilities, brake areas for clerks,
Cr secure areas for vote counting, access to records, access to
City Secretary and parking.
3) Physically moving equipment and records necessary to
hold the election.
4) A secure area to keep records over night for recounting
the next day because it is not possible to do required
recount of the votes the same day without taxing the
abilities of the clerks and judge beyond the normal physical
abilities because of the long hours involved.
I have discussed this with the superintendent of Carroll
Independent School District and appreciate his benevolence
in offering the facilities. He understands the problem with
the logistics of the proposed move. He and I both agree
that when city and school can cooperate, it is an excellent
idea, but in this case it would be more of a task than a
problem solver.
C
Memo to Council
rrl' Charles Curry
page two
1
4 The Mayor can attest to this in that he has been an election
judge for the city in the past.
I appreciate the thought but must oppose venomously the
proposal for making this change. I feel very strongly
that the city and it' s citizens will be best served by
continuing the procedures that have worked so well for us to
date.
Charles Curry
Election Judge
CC/sl
A'ow
1111
_ - - •
07 6ff '925 '
TEX-ART STONE & PRODUCTS
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
DEAR MR. MAYOR, HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, AND CITY STAFF.
1
PLEASE LET THIS LETTER SERVE AS NOTIFICATION OF MY OBJECTIONS AGAIN
TO DIXTOR CORPORATIONS INTENTION OF BUILDING RESIDENTIAL HOMES BORDERING 1
MY BUSINESS PROPERTY. I FEEL THE AREA CLOSER TO THE SCHOOL WOULD BE
SUITABLE TO RESIDENCES, PROVIDING THEY ARE NOT IN THE DIRECT FLIGHT PATH
OF GOODE AIRPORT. BUT THAT PART OF THE PROPERTY UNDER THE FLIGHT PATH, AND
BORDERING MY BUSINESS WOULD NOT BE SUITABLE FOR RESIDENCES, BY THE
VERY NATURE OF MY BUSINESS, AND GOODE AIRPORT.
MINE IS A RAPIDLY GROWING BUSINESS, WITH 1990 PROMISING TO BE EXTRA- 1
ORDINARY. I FEEL ANY RESIDENT BUYING NEXT TO MY PLANT, WOULD NOT
WISH TO SPEND MUCH MONEY ON A HOME SO CLOSE: THEREFORE, THE DEVELOPER 1
WOULD BE FORCED TO BUILD LESS EXPENSIVE HOMES.
(11,
GOODE AIRPORT IS ESPECIALLY BUSY ON WEEK ENDS, WHEN HOMEOWNERS
ARE GENERALLY AT HOME NORE.
I FEEL THAT THE CITY COUNCIL IS FULLY AWARE OF HOW THE PROPERTY IS
BEING DEVELOPED OUT UP AND DOWN DAVIS BOULEVARD. BUT I DO WISH TO
FORMALLY VOICE MY OBJECTIONS.
a
SINCERELY,
BETSY SHATLEY 11
TEX-ART STONE & PRODUCTS
11
I
w
ter`,
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
DEAR MR. MAYOR: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: AND CITY STAFF:
PLEASE LET THIS LETTER SERVE AS FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF MY OBJECTIONS TO
A CHURCH BUILDING TO BE ERECTED ON THE ACRE TRACT BORDERING MY SOUTHLAKE
di PLANT, AND FRONTING DAVIS BOULEVARD.
I DO NOT OBJECT TO THE OPERATION OF A CHURCH WITH THE BUILDING AS IT
gi
IS NOW, BUT I FEEL THE PROPERTY IS TOO SMALL FOR ANY CHURCH BUILDING
LARGER THAN A MOBIL UNIT. THE PARKING WOULD BE A PROBLEM, AND
ANY GROWTH WOULD BE RESTRICTED. I HAVE HEARD MANY CHURCH MEMBERS
COMPLAIN THAT THEIR BUILDING WAS ERECTED ON TOO SMALL A PIECE OF
PROPERTY FROM THE BEGINNING. I KNOW THIS SMALL CHURCH PLANS TO
EXPAND, AND CAN APPRECIATE THAT FACT. I WISH TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR,
r
` d1, BUT I ALSO WISH MY OBJECTIONS BE NOTED.
THANK Y ,
oil
SINCERELY,
:1 BETSY SHATLEY,
TEX-ART STONE & PRODUCTS
ai
I
4
4
di
(r1
i
,.--- -
-
ab
TABLE A - ri,,;,
( INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES
t
' Yearly Day-Night Average air
' Sound Level (Ldn) in
Decibels -
A B . C
Above ti`
65-70 70-75 75
RESIDENTIAL: iii
Residential, other than mobile homes
and transient N1 N1 N
Household units
Single units - detached
Single units - semidetached far
Single units - attached row
Two units - side-by-side
Two units - one above the other `,,
Apartments - walk up
Apartments - elevator
Group quarters
Residential hotels
cry Other residential
Mobile home parks N w,
N N
Transient lodgings Nl Nl N2
t
PUBLIC USE:
U►
Schools, hospitals and nursing homes 25 30 N
ilk
Educational services
Hospitals, nursing homes
t
Churches, auditoriums and concert halls 25 30 N
116
Cultural activities (including
churches) -
illi
Auditoriums, concert halls
Governmental services Y Y5 N3 ,Transportation z
Railroad, rapid rail transit and
street railway transportation _ a„
Motor vehicle transportation
Aircraft transportation
(lie Marine craft transportation
Highway and street right-of-way eb'
* A B • C
r. Above
65-70 70-75 75
r Parking Y Y2_ _.. Y3
COMMERCIAL USE
Offices, business and professional Y 25 N
Finance, insurance and real estate
services
Personal services
Business services
Professional services
Other medical facilities
Miscellaneous services
Wholesale and retail - building Y Y2 3
materials, hardware and farm
equipment
Wholesale trade
Retail trade - building materials,
hardware and farm equipment
Aw Repair services
Contract construction services
Retail trade - general Y 25 N
Retail trade - general merchandise.
Retail trade - food
Retail trade - automotive, marine
craft, aircraft and accessories
Retail trade - apparel and
accessories
Retail trade - furniture, home
furnishings and equipment
Retail trade - eating and
drinking establishments
al Other retail trade
Utilities Y Y2 Y3
Communications Y 25 N
4
-2-
Alf' e A B C it
Above
65-70 70-75 75 ..-
MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION br
Manufacturing, general Y -- y2 -- Y3
iar
Food and kindred products -
manufacturing *.
Textile mill products - manufacturing
ili
Apparel and other finished products
made from fabrics, leather and
similar materials - manufacturing - `
Lumber and wood products (except it
furniture) - manufacturing
Furniture and fixtures -
manufacturing lb
Paper and allied products -
manufacturing
Printing, publishing and allied
industriesso
Chemicals and allied products -
manufacturing
Petroleum refinishing and related lib
Illif industries
Rubber and misc. plastic products -
manufacturing
ili
Stone, clay and glass products -
manufacturing
Primary metal industries
Fabricated metal products -
manufacturing
Miscellaneous manufacturingr
lio
Photographic and optical - Y 25 N
r
Professional, scientific and ill
controlling instruments, -
photographic and optical goods,
watches and clocks - manufacturing
Agriculture 5 6 7
g (except livestock) and y y y
forestry
Oki
Agriculture (except livestock)
Agricultural related activities
Forestry activities and related
ill
services
fir Livestock farming and breeding y5 y6 N
as
-3- fa
I • _
1 .
ift .. ....._ . _
. .
, . .._ . . _.
. 5 }•./. ..• ..c .
A B ' C
Above
65-70 70-75 75
* 2
Mining and fishing, resources Y Y y
;1 production and extraction -
; Fishing activities and related
services
Other resource production and
extraction
i -
111 RECREATIONAL
Outdoor sports arenas and spectator Y4
Y4
N
sports
eli
Outdoor music shells, amphitheaters N N N
m
Nature exhibits and zoos y N N ii
Amusement parks, resorts and camps y y IT
1
Amusements
Parks
C Public assembly
Resorts and group camps
Other cultural, entertainment and
recreation
Gclf courses, riding stables and water Y 25 N
recreation
1 c:\slake\tablea.air
d
0
di
a
• ‘,
• -4-
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
111 GENERAL FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
OCTOBER 31, 1989
IFY90 FY90 ENCUMBRANCE TOTAL ACTUAL
YTD ACTUAL ANNUAL BUDGET & ENCUMBERED
Revenues:
I Taxes:
Property Sales $40,7331 $2, 020,530
0Franchise $57,809 $214,117
Licenses and Permits $33,118 $152,130
I Charges for Services $972 $61, 410
Fines $16,355 $259,480
Interest $1,155 $28, 000
Miscellaneous $41,444 $163, 562
ITotal Revenues $191, 584 $3,191, 426 $0 $0
Expenditures:
Current:
I General Government:
City Sec/Mayor/Council $6,604 $125, 480 $108 $6,712
City Manager ' s Off $5,033 $74, 753 $0 $5,033
Support Services $57,700 $359, 230 $402 $58,102
Finance $9,189 $159,007 $853 $10,042
ICourt $8, 214 $105, 612 $28 $8,242
Total Gen. Gov' t $86,740 $824, 082 $1, 391 $88,131
I Public Safety:
Fire $27,916 $406, 114 $1,130 $29,046
Police $62, 813 $906, 478 $437 $63,250
Building $8,011 $147,915 $51 $8,062
ITotal Pub. Safety $98,740 $1, 460, 507 $1,618 $100, 358
Public Works:
Streets $13,438 $397,325 $0 $13,438
II Parks $2,254 $66, 214 $0 $2,254
Public Works $2,469 $54,080 $28 $2,497
Total Public Works $18,161 $517,619 $28 $18,189
IITotal Expenditures $203,641 $2, 802, 208 $3,037 $206,678
Excess Rev. (Expenditures ) ( $12,057) $389,218
Other Financing Sources (Uses ) :
Debt Service Transfers $0 ( $157,696)
I Excess Revenues & Other
Financing Sources over
Expenditures & Other
11 Financing Uses-Actual ($12,057) $231, 522
I
Fund Balance 10/O1/89x* $355,228 $355, 228
Reserve-Personnel Adj ($157,697 )
I Fund Balance 10/31/89 $343,171 $429,053
& Expected Yr End Bal
I ** Fund balance 10/01/89 is subject to audit adjustments.
I
■
. II I -
1 -1 -1
• Y •
C r
lam -11-ISrmD o rr
r+ ZZ WAXI "013Z37C7K===410-•"•111•1•10fYA®O7m D7
�'/: 'CCI•Y3CS0 S• 4Yr+r•YOi•Y••CY/17100<COY10u+••1Y 7
O •N•7C0-,,l r• '30<flr7 2xx7r*•10. 1•*7•I..IOrOr'C30.r7 0
C
C r fl 7>:3 Y N11.• AAA N 1+•SII+A'A•••7 I-N r�0 3 A•1••=s l••.•Q•IIMA 0 p
7 O OA• nY• O•= 07,1-4fl•r.►N ••A•O.O. 0430flOr• *07 0 Y7
-w C r r 4, 47 C 0 3• •YOfl4.rEO.1 A3:< ZA•444.470<20'0 C A•
1- 3 Y 00 7V17•; C0770S•O.OY o+�0 3 rrtoC<OOOA 3 •3
• rt A•A '3 Y O. Nr•'I I.,, 03,7= 447' ►►C X 0 A
4-40IC AS Y 7C O Y Q rt• 44.0044... till+ ►••3 7 IC
O Y A N SY 7 3 iA I+Sr 7 r0. \
1 '0 10-•< X' I+IC O 'C 7 r <0 • A r-1
O 0•r •• -. 1+ I..A I+ 4-04- 4-3 r 4 I.. = • r0 A \v
r ►+7• 0 • ►µ. Y7 < O0
-
sa av
7 .0
A N
t
Y�
I
• •
4C. N
• 'i ,
. A• w A•A. A •. iZ
II. .O w w•A• wr. w•wUI Vw.4U1•AN •w• •WP S•
IT w • AW •V ►•U1CV VVN•VNU1V vvNPAINU*.'Nv•PVN I.•A
N r 0 rW NVVWNWO NVrWVP.CM 0‘0V0000,0%0.4 IVr0 N
I
. A. Aw. .. . . . . w �.
O PPVPVUIN 4,4,4 4•Novv•OwNr00Uno•o .47010 rPVNNN►.NNP 'OY
✓ NPUIOSVU1W O0...$4 NWNVPVVVN4rtNPrVOVPNVVVWOWN 0IC
v OVOI-O.W Nw40 +A� OPONOW.+ O O.0wwOOPOVWOPOVNUIVVV fl 3
01 rOAUIrOP rAO1VU1VU1VPrOU1r0IW.i0Or0NWr0.48 (WOr 03
V 00.UIUIW1V0•0 0,r0WV0..NrNv00.1.WOON.007NVOVI•+NWr(*Vv0.0 MA*
A
t"1 1+
O A
w 3 <
0
• (0S • w Y W A
0 A N Mn Y 0
w w• w •ww. • w. fl Y I+ 3
A N 0 zt ANN•w• ..7..- 00.N U) NWPr•*N ww• wwo.I I..0' • 9
WN 6-.0 •r -4 u-.Vwv 0,v0NVWr(0 SW U70r N r•rN UI A U1 Or 0 r a A
W r 0r rN OUlwwWC. CNTwOZW101 vw0 ION-IPW•O'r(0wr i• i
A. . A. . •. +i . w. . . a. . . . . . . . . .. . 0 0
V PV(0N(0U1V WU) I0NNONOVWZWr0V02•••OWWONOV►+WW(MVr' <-0 3 r
V CAUIW(0WN vC")INAONvrA0ON.••VI(0NWWA vOWIVArU1GP •Y 0. b..W Or(0OVN. 0 00 WWVVrUI— 0.0rrwNOUIw00A0Vrr0Vrr WC • Wn 3 C ' A
U1 VKNrPU1rNrO' VNOVNNrVNODONNvrr�TAri'WWONU1rOWNN • a •
0 Ul ' (0v0A VI0V4.0UfUIOrrvv..0D- OUTrNP0UIVVrU1NrOVV 7 • 0 T
rt 0 •
• 11 O
x C ti
7
(I r 1
11 1 I r I 0 r•• •
I I UI I —A— I 0rWINI Nov .. I Nr Irr ... 1 N I NrrN Cl 3 fl XUI v10'0.0.0UINrVloui
PN01-.0 PNUO.OVONOU..00w=VWN0 00..Ww T '0 Y
• {' ' Y 0 D M
W U10VPrIJ1VNO OIIlIV VCWPVrOOPvNP(0VO4.T(0(0vAWVVUIrrrOWW 7 7 fl
W OyW U)VNVO(0U1 O�oMPVII,NWIJIOW(0NO V.•+V WPO•NTPN9PrNON.OVOUIW 10 v. f)
_ X 01XXX X XXXX XIX0XXX4100.XX0X X XXXXXXXX XXXX XX 0XXXXX a a 0_
O
Z
I W A
H N
• a. 3
w A 1. • w was-ow w •r r 3
V v w r NNT4.1 N NV V 0
• wN ••A A. • •NN. . . . . •*. Aw• •. . (0
r U►wA N •A •AWwrNP PP04PNwN 0PCN:.Ir.OwrrUTAP(UI -V <
O .O.II—*IJlNNrCM .+00 OrwV•N PPNw VO r•.O rNPANNWW Pr W(0PA 0
Ui NN(0V(000. P 0Pr 0 V Or 0 wv w Pr OW 0PVNOVr VO0r rrV Or
OW
r V(0030%—P— 0..+000VVW0.0NVA00rC.••rrPAw(04..0VONPCN Y'C
UI 4%w'0.0,V0 WV 0•0VWNPUIrvrvN—..vCVrM.Dve A0rr-P 4.3
W NONPUIVN Wv0VOWVVNrNVUIWrUIvVVUI0,VvNA1NU1rWIVV ••
0 VPVOVOW WO OOrVAVO.•OONOrtAVrIJ)vWNr00N{J1U A
W r�+r00U10(0W NrtTIrOVU1NVWWVrrNN•ONVOOA(00WPOWO(0UIUI N
i .
• w
• • • •
wNwW * •r r
v w r NNUiW r ry .0
A A4► AAA w. A AAA. N. ••. Aw• a. . (0
r N N •N •.N•LNP PWV*0%0Wr rC0srwrV0rrwaUV•0 1(0
11 r raUIN0r0. r00,400V NvUNONrv•O0(0.wrNN1%vVNWUIW 0
N rNVVVNr WUIbNVvr 00VLVNOV01NONPNV0%V0,02rVCO2V .12
. .4 . . . . N. CM
VV C
0PrOON PNI71rrU1NNU1v•�•(0VPOPO.••VVWVVOOVPrrVWO Y'G J
W NPNNUION UIWOPVLU1v0vVV1WW(0.I•PVOVVI(0CU)w0LUIWVV A3
P wrVr(0OU1 VNOIrwLWrIJIVVNu(0NVo31VWWVAOVVVWVVPLN •• 1
• • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Cr.I/ LAPrVVN vt%01WVNOVWNrrrWUINv0U0LVVVNNrVWVL0%W rt
V rVUIOrUfr WN{NANlJ1rrU1WP0U1rNN.ONWrPPrWVVOU1N PrV N Y
10
•
I 1 r W I 1 -CI {v
I rl I W Ir NrNr s0 ro rr elrirr A r r1 WrNN 7
•-. NArOVPN •"•'NNOrrrOOrAr(0rr00rrPbI U1VAI.•VVV(000 S W >„
Y r
V ONWNOUIr VOIr•WPPr00VNrVrVUt►NNNIN0rA0002rrV0V 7
V VLV0PV,v tT1A VV0rWVNPWOW(0NWWN(0(000.1. 0.r(0OOr(0ww C
I X a. •.\'.XXXXXX \ XX.XXXXX.\•XXX.•X.\•.\•XXXX.\•XX.XX.\\•X.\•X.\•:t0 •
On
I
CITY OF SOUTHL KE
CASH ACTIVITY REPORT - CAL FUND
FOR THE PERIOD E DED, OCTOBER, 1989
L
WEEK ENDING DEPOSITS - ACCOUNTS PAY. - PAYROLL - DEBT _
RUNNING
SERVICE BALANCE
I
Beginning dance:
$104,126
10/06/89 S 9,438 $ 10,881 $ 47,470 55,213
11 10/13/89 38,866 30,681 63,398
10/20/89 83,973 28,484 50,389 68,498
10/27/89
/ /89 34,202 31,031 71,669
i
E Average Weekly Deposit: $ 41,620
(excluding footnoted items)
Average Weekly Disbursement
(excluding footnoted items) : 25,269
Average Payroll: 48,930
Total Certificates of Deposit to Date: 180,000
I
I
1
2
S
4
I/
4
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CASH ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Beginning Cash Balance $104,126
Deposits 166, 479
Investments
Accounts Payable (101, 077 )
Payroll (97,859 )
Debt Service 0
3
Ending Cash Balance $71,669
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
Beginning Cash Balance 3
Deposits
Investments
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Debt Service
Ending Cash Balance
AUG SEPT
Beginning Cash Balance
Deposits
Investments
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Debt Service I
Ending Cash Balance
Footnotes:
1
3
3
J