Item 6E - Staff MemoSOUTHLA14CE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
August 9, 2022
CASE NO: ZA22-0028
PROJECT: Site Plan for 300 Parkwood Drive Medical Office Buildin
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Ward Architecture PLLC, is requesting approval of a Site Plan for 300 Parkwood
Drive Medical Office Building on property described as Lot 13R, O.W. Knight No.
899 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and
located at 300 Parkwood Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2'
Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 9.
DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan to develop a one-story medical
office building totaling 10,654 square feet. The proposed building is south of the
existing Calloway's Nursery, and west of the Southlake Training Center along
Parkwood Drive.
The site is zoned "S-P-2", Generalized Site Plan District which allows for "0-1"
Office District uses. The proposed use/site plan is consistent with the "0-1" office
district regulations and no variances to the site plan are being requested. A
concept plan was adopted with the SP-2 zoning of the property in 2007 (case
ZA07-108). A copy of the approved concept plan is provided in the City Council
packet. The "Preservation Area", as reflected in the adopted concept plan (ZA07-
108), is to remain.
The Site Data Summary Chart below compares the proposed site plan to the
approved concept plan.
Site Data Summary Lot 13R
Approved Concept
Plan ZA07-108
Proposed Site Plan
ZA22-028
Existing Zoning
SP-2
SP-2
Land Use Designation
Office Commercial
Office Commercial
Gross/Net Acreage
2.927 AC. (127,500 SF)
2.927 AC. (127,500 SF)
Number of Proposed Lots
1
1
% of Lot Coverage
9.4%
8.4%
Total Building Floor Area Gross
12,000 sf
10,654 sf
Building Height/Number of Stories
Permitted 35 ft./ 2-1/2
-28.5 ft./ 1
Open Space Area (sq. ft. / acres)
90,471 sf
80,222 sf
Open Space %
71.3%
63%
Impervious Coverage (sq. ft
N/A
47,278 sf
Impervious Coverage %
29.07%
37%
Total Parking Required / Provided
40/50
72/77
Case No.
ZA22-0028
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 9, 2022
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
STAFF CONTACT
Narrative
SPIN Report
Corridor Planning Committee Report
Presentation
Plans
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Reagan Rothenberger (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA22-0028
OWNER:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Beam Real Estate
APPLICANT: Ward Architecture, PLLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 300 Parkwood Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 13R, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: -February 3, 1998 — City Council approved ZA97-130 Rezoning and
Concept Plan for French Square Office Complex.
-October 6, 1998 — City Council approved ZA98-058, Site Plan for French
Square Office Complex.
-October 6, 1998 — City Council approved ZA98-083, Plat Showing of Lots
12, 13, and 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. This plat was never filed.
-January of 2000 — City Council decided not to extend Parkwood Drive
from Byron Nelson Parkway to East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709).
-June 5, 2001 — City Council approved a plat showing of Lot 12, 13, & 14,
O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. The plat was filed on July 18, 2003.
- November 21, 2007 — City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for lots 12R and
13R, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition.
SOUTH LAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation is Office Commercial. The Office
Commercial land use designation is defined within Southlake 2035 as the
following:
"The Office Commercial category is a commercial category designed and
intended for the exclusive use of office and limited office -related activities.
It is established for and will be allocated to those districts best suited for
supporting commercial activity of an office character. It has been
established to encourage and permit general professional and business
offices of high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped
surroundings with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so
controlled as to be generally compatible with existing and future adjacent
and surrounding residential development. Properties with this designation
may serve as a transition between established residential neighborhoods,
major roadways, and retail development. Other suitable activities are
those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public
categories previously discussed."
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The development is bound Parkwood Drive, which will act as the primary
access for the site. The developer does not propose to connect the
northern portion of Parkwood Drive to the southern portion of Parkwood
Case No.
ZA22-0028
Attachment A
Page 1
Drive that intersects with Byron Nelson Parkway.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The applicant proposes a 4' sidewalk along Parkwood Drive per the
Master Plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The development is bound by the Parkwood Drive, a Local Street with 60'
of ROW.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Study was not required for this site plan.
TREE PRESERVATION/
LANDSCAPING: The proposed tree preservation and non -disturbance conforms with the
approved case ZA07-108 Site Plan.
The proposed existing tree cover preservation complies with the existing
tree cover preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance 585-E. There is 32% of existing tree cover on the property
and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover is required to be preserved.
The applicant is proposing to preserve 66+% of the existing tree cover.
UTILITIES: The Site is served by an 8" water line along Parkwood Drive.
The Site is served by an 8" sewer line along Parkwood Drive.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on April 26, 2022.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held March 28, 2022.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: Approved (7-0); subject to Staff Report dated July 29, 2022, and Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated July 29, 2022.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August
9, 2022.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA22-0028 Page 2
Vicinity Map
300 Parkwood Dr.
271
251
221
261
241
231
518 51 512 510
NORTHW
518
P
`0>
502 501 400
503 402
506 505
� 404
�p1
17 600 601 406
201 520 602 603
600 519 41
Mai
.Ie
�� GREI
0� oM o 0
ZA22-0028
Site Plan
0 90 180 360
Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA22-0028 Page 1
REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA22-0028 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 08/09/22
Project Name: Site Plan — 300 Parkwood
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Ward Architecture, PLLC Beam Real Estate
Gerald Ward Mani Jacobs
5004 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville 76034 14455 Webb Chapel Rd. Farmers Branch 75234
Phone: 817.281.5600 Phone: 214.244.3332
Email: gerald@wardarchitecturepllc.com Email: mani@beamrealestate.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
07/29/22 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT REAGAN ROTHENBERGER AT (817) 748-8062.
1. The Site Plan must conform to the underlying zoning district.
2. Revise the title block to include County and State.
3. North parking bay shows 7 parking stalls but is labeled as 9.
4. A count of 79 is shown on the face of the Site Plan, but Data Summary Chart shows 77. It
appears 77 spots are shown on the plan.
5. Maximum height of the building shown on the Site Plan's Data Summary Sheet is 0'. Maximum
permitted height is 35'.
6. Site Plan references "2700.0' Preservation Area. Please clarify this measurement, is it
intended to say 270' or 27000 square feet?
7. Please label the area of the Preservation/No Disturbance Area.
Covered parking requires an SUP.
It is noted that zoning approval waived the 8-foot fence requirement adjacent to residential
property in lieu of providing the Preservation Area.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
The existing tree cover preservation calculations on the color and black and white Tree Conservation
Plans conflict. Please correct the plan that is incorrect. Since a Color Tree Conservation Plan is
required, this review will be based on it.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 1
* The proposed tree preservation and non -disturbance conforms with the approved case ZA07-
108 Site Plan.
* The proposed existing tree cover preservation complies with the existing tree cover
preservation requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 32% of existing tree
cover on the property and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover is required to be preserved. The
applicant is proposing to preserve 66+% of the existing tree cover.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree
cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the
time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that
must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% — 20%
70%
20.1 — 40%
60%
40.1 % - 60%
50%
60.1 % - 80%
40%
80.1 % - 100%
30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights -of -way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands,
natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 2
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Due to the previous zoning and development approval Case ZA07-108, The east bufferyard
has two (2) required bufferyard types. A 20' — O is required where adjacent to Parkwood Drive, and a
10' — F1 where adjacent to the community service (CS) and residental zoned properties. Please
provide the required bufferyards, correct the Bufferyards Summary Chart, and provide the required
landscaping accordingly.
2. In the Bufferyards Summary Chart, show the "Provided" bufferyards length and width/type.
Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for some of the required interior landscape and
bufferyards plant material. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy
condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at
the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The parking stalls along the north side of the property were revised from 9 spaces to 7
spaces, however, the label wasn't updated.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
2. The provided infiltration values do not match the most current iSWM manual, updated in
April 2020.
3. The Existing Drainage Area Map was provided, however, the total area doesn't match the
total proposed area.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 3
Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist to the
Public Works Department through the online customer self service portal located here: CSS
(citvofsouthlake.com). Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to
the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are
located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S.
SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
A Developer Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement
on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comment that don't need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 4
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length
of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be
in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is located in a vault,
or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is located on the riser. (Riser room not indicated on the plans to
verify dimensions) (Plans indicate 110 linear feet of piping, which would require the double
check to be located in a vault)
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC location not
indicated on the plans) (Add FDC location, wall mount or remote connection to meet the
distance requirement)
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 5
General Informational Comments
The Development Review Committee (DRC) has determined this pre -submittal is sufficient for
formal submittal to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to completing the changes
noted above .
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA22-0028 Page 6
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
- .E Sot,rhba�. 81w,1 -- - -- - ❑J
Whites
Chapel _ �'�0� E South lake Blvd
Cemetery
^•
I
f
'Pf hid'
Chapel
hdethodist
Ch-h
SPO #
Owner
Zoning
Physical Address
Acreage
Response
1.
FRITH, JOHN D
SP2
261 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.57
NR
2.
CREST SECURITIES LTD
SP2
241 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.80
NR
3.
SMITH, MARSHALL
RPUD
501 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.33
NR
4.
LIVINGSTONE, KYLE
RPUD
400 PARKWOOD CT
0.28
NR
5.
LEI, HAO
RPUD
503 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.24
NR
6.
JOSHI, SUMEET
RPUD
402 PARKWOOD CT
0.25
NR
7.
BRONSON, THOMAS A
RPUD
506 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.26
NR
8.
SHARP, SUSAN
RPUD
512 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.26
NR
9.
HERRERA, FELIPE
RPUD
510 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.24
NR
10.
HUSAIN, MUSTAFA
RPUD
505 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.25
NR
11.
VUONG, CUONG
RPUD
518 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.24
NR
12.
CHOI, JOU-YOUNG
RPUD
507 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.34
NR
13.
PASKVAN, THEODORE
RPUD
517 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.30
NR
14.
ALLEN, ANDREW
RPUD
600 NORTHWOOD CT
0.24
NR
15.
BEDUNAH, SCOTT
RPUD
601 NORTHWOOD CT
0.29
NR
16.
HAM ILTON, JACOB T
RPUD
602 NORTHWOOD CT
0.24
NR
17.
ROSENTHAL, HOWARD L
RPUD
603 NORTHWOOD CT
0.29
NR
18.
FROST, STEPHEN
RPUD
519 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.26
NR
19.
CALLOWAY'S NURSERY INC
SP2
291 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD
3.11
NR
20.
CHRISTIANSON, BRANDON L
RPUD
508 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.26
NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0028 Page 1
21.
WANG, YUQIANG
RPUD
502 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.26
NR
22.
SAKHONKO, EVGENY
RPUD
500 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.29
O
23.
OFFICE BY THE PARK LLC
SP2
300 PARKWOOD DR
2.79
NR
24.
PROVIDENCE BANCSHARES CORP
SP2
315 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.07
NR
25.
STEWART REVOCABLE TRUST
SF1-A
201 PINE DR
3.00
NR
26.
GROSSKOPF, SCOTT
RPUD
516 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.40
NR
27.
THE RKB REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
RPUD
514 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.24
NR
28.
FINN, CHRISTINE M
RPUD
520 NORTHWOOD TRL
0.25
NR
29.
WHITE'S CHAPEL METH CH
CS
185 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
23.84
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent within 300': Twenty -Nine (29)
Responses Received: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 1 Undecided: 0
NR: No Response
No Response: 28
One Undecided Response was received outside of the 300' notification buffer.
Case No.
ZA22-0028
Attachment D
Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No.
ZA22-0028
Attachment D
Page 1
From: no l ,V . i M
To: Ken_,_, Rom. fkennis Killi: MaMl Ouiasky J! M^nc: R—n RnHwnly— %^ , Rarcl,y; J,ppab
McKenzie
Subject: Online For n Submittal: Planning & Zoning Case Input Form
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 3, 32:08 PM
Planning & Zoning Case Input Form
Project Name 300 Parkwood Drive
Planning & Zoning ZA22-0028
Case Number
Project Location 300 Parkwoed Drive
I am, Undecided
Comments / Could not attend hearing August 4. Attended the SPIN hearing in
Explanation April and talked with JerryWard of Ward architecture, the
architect for the developer. Leaning towards in favor if the
following conditions are met,
1. no zoning change from what was approved for Calloway's in
200712008.
2_ Preservation area! no disturbance area that was created for
the Calloways approval is maintained
3. As much as possible, natural elements such as shrubs and
trees are used to screen the proposed building from the
residential area Screening would also include from lighting and
car headlights. Mr. Ward said he thought it could be done at the
SPIN hearing April 28.
3. Parkwood Drive next to Calloway's is renamed to something
else as was promised more than 20 years ago. Right now it is
confused with the residential Parkwood Drive (attached to Byron
Nelson Parkway). No one is using this 1709 attached section of
Parkwood Drive as an address yet. For your reference, according
to the January 16, 2001 City Council minutes, "Director of
Planning Bruce Payne said after he had talked with Ms. Wolfe
they decided it would be best to name that section of the street
something other than Parkwood Drive, and it would be changed
on the plat" (note, Ms, Wolfe was then living at 601 Parkwood
Drive) .
4, Parkwood Drive is never connected. ESRI map needs to be
updated to reflect that. On February 1, 2000, the City Council
voted to NOT connect Parkwood Drive all the way through and
instead construct the cul de sac that exists today. Reasons given
Case No.
ZA22-0028
Attachment D
Page 2
included not directing 1709 traffic through a residential
neighborhood.
First Name Eric
Last Name Karl
Address 604 Northwood Court
Phone Number
(Optional)
City
State
8172405816
Southlake
TX
Zip (WW2
Disclaimer
This form is to provide feedback on planning & zoning -related requests. Your
comments are placed in the related case file as a matter of public record and
forwarded to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council if action is
required by these bodies. Your submission of this form shall not be considered a
formal protest under Section 211.006(d) of the Texas Local Government Code
unless your signature is uploaded and submitted with this form.
Disclaimer Yes, I understand
Acknowledgment
Signature (For Formal 2022 Sianature.odf
Protests)
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser_
Case No. Attachment D
ZA22-0028 Page 3