Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1990-11-20 CC Packet
City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting, November 20, 1990 --------------------------------------------------- 1. Agenda item No. 4. City Manager's Report. Note the Departmental reports. Please let me know if you have any questions. 2. Agenda Item No 5 Contract with Star Telegram. The Telegram contract gives the City an economical source for our legal publications. 3. Agenda Item No 7 Appointment of Reserve Officers. This is a formality required by the recently amended reserve officer ordinance. 4. Agenda Item No 8 Agreement with CISD for Sewer. This is the agreement we discussed previously. The school is currently reviewing. There may be some minor modifications by work session time Tuesday. 5. Agenda Item No. 9. Resolution authorizing contract with Cheatham and Associates for engineering on school sewer is in keeping with our previous direction. 6. Agenda -Item No. 11. Discussion of Contract for Waste Recycling. Representatives from the Environmental Task Force will be present, along with someone from Laidlaw Waste Systems. We can expect appearances by representatives from other waste recyclers, including Buck Hubbard. 7. Agenda Item No. 12. Health Services Ordinance. We will have the directed changes from the first reading incorporated by Tuesday night. Recall that we were directed to add the provision that produce grown and sold on property in Southlake by Southlake residents would be exempted from the produce stand permit requirement. 8. Agenda Items Nos. 14-15, Stone Lakes Subdivision. We can expect opposition from some of the homeowners in SouthRidge Lakes. 9. Agenda Items Nos. 16-18. Carroll High School Addition. Staff from the City and CISD have accord on these items, including the 84 ft. right-of-way recommended by the P&Z. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 16, 1990 Page 2 10. Agenda Item No. 19. Plat Revision Lots 6 & 7, Whispering Dell. Note that P&Z recommended deleting the requirement for an avigation agreement. They felt it would be discriminatory since no other plats in the subdivision would have the easement. 11. Agenda Item No. 21. Park Ordinance. The additions you requested are outlined in pink on page 21-4 of the agenda packet. 12. Agenda Item No. 25. Council Committee recommendations. The committee for Charter revisions met for approximately 2-1/2 hours on Tuesday night. A f t d In es will be forthcoming. We 13. number o sugges e c g will have them compiled for presentation by meeting time. We hope to have an opportunity to meet with the bond committee by Tuesday. nda Item No. 26A. We hope to have somethinc sitive by Monday afternoon. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 14. FM1709 Project Update. Mayor Pro Tem Springer and I attended two meetings this week concerning the project. Monday afternoon, November 12, we attended a work session of the Tarrant County Commissioners' Court in Ft. Worth. MPT Springer addressed the Court on our behalf. The work session concerned proposals by the cities of Keller and Southlake to enter interlocal contracting agreements with the County for the purpose of right-of-way acquisition on FM1709 within the respective cities. The 2-1/2 hour work session focused on (1) whether or not the proposed contracts would change road project priorities and result in the undesirable consequences of cities competing for projects, and (2) the appropriateness of the County contracting with the cities, vis-a-vis the County hiring additional attorneys (either new staff or a firm specializing in land acquisition/condemnation). During the discussion on priorities, Commissioner Hampton reminded the Court that cities had already competed for the projects (when they were approved in previous years in the County's transportation improvement plan) based upon needs agreed upon by the County and the State, thus the competition is over. He pointed out that the proposal of the cities would not affect existing priorities, which have projected contract letting dates. ` Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 16, 1990 Page 3 The Court was told by Raymond Soloski, County ROW Supervisor, that the priorities are as follows: 1. State Hwy157 South in Arlington 2. US377 South, between Loop 820 and Watauga Road. (March 92 letting schedule) 3. FM1709 East (Southlake portion) March 92 letting schedule) 4. FM1709 West (Keller portion) 5. US377 North (Watauga Road to Keller). According to Soloski, there are five (5) parcels of land to be required still in Arlington, and eighteen (18) remaining on FM1709 East (see attached). There was also a question raised concerning whether or not the County has enough money to purchase the right-of-way required. The Court was told by their Administrator, G.K. Maenius, that they had a funding problem that can be resolved by issuing C.O.s as planned. (see attached) From my vantage point, there appeared to be a contest between the Auditor's Office, the District Attorney's Office, and the Public Works ROW Office to find fault with the delay in land acquisition. It appeared that the projects lack coordination between the various offices. The work session adjourned with the Court resolved only to continue looking at which alternatives to pursue. The majority seemed to be leaning toward authorizing additional help for the DA's office, although a decision still does not appear imminent. I spoke with Jane Sanford in Commissioner Hampton's office this morning. She told me that Representative Carter has spoken with the DA's Office since last Monday, and expressed concern. The item will be back on the Commissioners' Court Agenda next Monday. (I will be attending the afternoon session. Let me know if any of you want to accompany me.) Wednesday afternoon late, MPT Springer, Barry Emerson, and me met with Billie Farrar, Jim Farrar, Wayne Lee, and County Judge -elect Tom Vandergriff in Jim Farrar's new office on FM1709 to discuss the project. I believe we explained the situation to the satisfaction of the judge -elect, that is, to the point that he has a sufficient understanding of the problems we have Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 16, 1990 Page 4 experienced. With Vandergriff and Commissioner -elect Marti VanRavenswaay from Arlington, we should be able to get action from the Commissioners' Court in January if not before then. 15. The Oak Hills Developers Agreement has been executed by the developer and the tennis court renovation has been substantially completed. Looking good. 16. The CISD's architects and staff met on Thursday and Friday to discuss traffic flow and right-of-way questions that were discussed at P & Z. The CISD has agreed to dedicate 84 ft. of right-of-way and have agreed to relocate the first entrance to the school approximately 350 ft. south from FM1709 right-of-way line. Both the district and staff feel that we have a workable solution to maintain traffic safety and allow for smooth traffic flow to and from the proposed new high school. 17. The three (3) portable building sections have been set and anchored. The contractor is planning to work over the weekend and be substantially complete by Wednesday, November 21. Staff will move in the building on Saturday, November 24 barring any complications. Looking good. 18. Lemke Construction has finished the concrete work for the parking lot improvements with the exception of the sidewalk on the north and east side of the new building and the curb and gutter on the south side. Plans are to pour these sections on Monday. Crack sealing was completed on Friday. Parking lot and fire lane striping will be completed on Sunday. 19. Space Utilization Committee met with the architects Wednesday to discuss the renovations to City Hall. The decision was made to have the architects hire mechanical, electrical, and structural consultants to determine what effect flooring the entire upstairs would have on those systems and the estimated cost of those improvements. After answers to the mechanical, electrical, and structural questions have been determined the committee will reconvene and determine what renovations will be designed. It is anticipated that answer to these questions will be forthcoming within next 2 to 3 weeks. Staff is trying to have plans ready to bid in January. 20. Finance Officer Vacancy. We are in the process of recruiting for a Finance Officer. We have received Renee Wheeler's resignation, effective December 12. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 16, 1990 Page 5 Although she will be available at home for questions, etc., she will no longer be in the office. We hope to have a Finance Officer on board by the middle of December. 21. Planner Position. We are nearing a decision point on selection of our planner. Please remember that from the beginning our intent was to use the funds we have been paying to Cheatham and Associates for plan reviews, etc., to go toward the planner's position. In addition to the plan reviews, however, we expect the planner to also work with Council and staff on any number of planning -related issues, including coordinating with the park master plan, etc. However, please remember that the majority of the Planner's time will be obligated to administrative or current planning (i.e., problem resolution). Very little time will be left for the type of visionary planning we need as we seek to create a true master plan. This is not to say that we will not begin the process, however. City offices will be closed Thursday and Friday, November 22 and 23 for Thanksgiving. TARRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT G. K. MAENIUS ADMINISTRATOR November 12, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: County Judge & Commissioners FROM: G. K. Maenius SUBJECT: Right -Of -Way Funding - FY91 During the development of the County's FY91 budget, the Court authorized a right-of-way budget of $4,000,000. This amount was divided into two line items within the budget: County Projects (100% county funding) - $3,340,000, and ROW Combined (90% state- 10% county funding) - $660,000. The Auditor's Office has notified our office that thru November 5th, a total of $1,520,683.73 has been spent in county projects and $73,079.50 has been spent in combined projects (see attached letter.) Additionally, the Auditor's Office has initiated an encumbrance system which removes monies .from the available revenues in both of these funds whenever an offer letter is sent to a property owner. Based on the commitments provided to the Auditor's Office from the R.O.W. Division, $2,101,550 has been encumbered in the county project line item and $97,268.40 has been encumbered in the combined line item. Factoring in the encumbered funds, we currently have $207,418.37 remaining for right-of-way purchases. (Please note that in the past, the Auditor's Office did not have an encumbrance system in place.) The Auditor's Office has advised that it will not pay any claim for a R.O.W. purchase currently not on the commitment list supplied by the R.O.W. Division until the budget is amended or offers are withdrawn in a sufficient amount to ensure funds will be available. If we do not have sufficient funding for R.O.W. purchases, the Highway Department's construction schedule could be affected. This would mean that projects for which the County has purchased part of the needed right-of-way would be delayed. TARRANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 180 E. WEATHERFORD, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 74196-%" 817l877-278S Page 2 In developing potential solutions to this funding problem, the staff has identified three alternatives: 1. Do not increase the current right-of-way funding level. This alternative would leave the funding level at $4 million. It would also mean that no additional R.O.W. would be purchased. It should be noted that the County has purchased substantial R.O.W. on all of the current four major projects. If we do not continue these purchases, these projects could slip on the Highway Department's letting schedule. This slippage would result in project delays and potential loss of project funding. 2. Transfer revenues from Department 02-6607-9501 (Road and Bridge Undesignated) to the R.O.W. line item. There is approximately $943,000 in this undesignated fund which could be utilized for R.O.W. purchases. There are two problems associated with this alternative: (A) From this undesignated line item, it is anticipated that the County will fund the salaries of the Transportation Director and that Department's top managers; and (B) The R.O.W. Division anticipates that the R.O.W. funding needs will be greater than this amount. 3. Increase the amount of certificates of obligation which the County had anticipated selling, thereby increasing R.O.W. funds. The Court had determined to sell $4 million in C.O.s to purchase R.O.W. in FY91. Both the Budget Officer and the Auditor's Office believe that FY91 R.O.W. funding could be increased through this method. The R.O.W. Division had originally requested a total FY91 right-of-way budget of $6 million. The Division now believes that this figure will be approximately $6.8 million. It is the staffs recommendation that the Court exercise alternative 13. This alternative would provide adequate R.O.W. funding and avoid the potential slippage of current projects on the Highway Department's letting schedule. The Court should direct the R.O.W. Division, the Budget Officer, and the Administrator to develop a recommended funding amount to be included in the sale of C.O.S. ca119002 TARRANT COUNTY Tarrant County Administration Building - Room 100 E. Weatherford Fort Worth, Texas 76196.0103 917/334-1205 JIMMY C. (JIM) CAUSEY, CPA COUNTY AUDITOR November 2, 1990 Mr. G. K. Maenius Commissioners' Court Administrator 100 E. Weatherford St. Fort Worth, TX 76196 Dear Mr. Maenius: •�N \\ j S06 RONALD D. BERTEL, CPA FIRST ASSISTANT COUNTY AUDITOR On November 1, 1990, I received a listing of outstanding offers on right-of-way projects prepared by Mr. Raymond Soloski. Upon receipt I totaled the amounts listed and reviewed amounts already paid against this year's budget and the following table presents my findings: Budget Paid Thru 11/05 Commitments (1) 02-6650-9919 County Projects $3,345,000.00 (1,520,683.73) (2,101,550.00) 02-66-50-9920 ROW $660,000.00 (73,079.50) (97,268.40) Total $4,005,000.00 (1,593,763.23) (2,198,819.40) Remainder of (over) Budget $(277,233.73) $489,652.10 $ 212,-418.37 (1) per listing provided by Mr. Raymond Soloski as adjusted for amounts paid thru 11/05. As you can see, if all offers made on County projects and State Highway projects are accepted then the amount necessary to close will leave only $212,418.37 available for any appraisals and closing expenses. Accordingly, we will not pay any claim for a ROW purchase currently not on the commitment list supplied by the Right of Way Department until the budget is amended or offers are withdrawn in a sufficient amount to ensure funds will be available. Mr. G. K. Maenius November 2, 1990 Page Two This situation re -affirms the need for the procedure that we requested in our letter of October 19, 1990 requiring our budget approval prior to release of any "offer letters". To date, we have not seen any offer letters. Hopefully, this procedure will enable us to avoid the embarrasing position that the County was in last year. Very truly, Ronald D. Bertel, CPA First Assistant County Auditor RDB:s1 cc: The Honorable Roy English and Members of The Tarrant Commissioners' Court Debbie Schneider, Budget Officer Jim Stewart, Public Works Director F . M . 157 — SOUTH SECTION II r How Many Parcels on Project: 85 How Many Parcels Closed as of 11-9-90: 80 How Many Parcels Remain: 5 Negotiation: 2 Condemnation: 3 Total Est. Cost (ROW Fee Only): $ 1,8618530.00 How Much Already Spent as of 11-9-90: $ 1,729,480.00 How Much Money to Finish Project: $ 132,050.00 -3- V.M. 1709 — EAST SECTION R L How Many Parcels on Project: How Many Parcels Closed as of 11-9-90: How Many Parcels Remain: Negotiation: Condemnation: Total Est. Cost (ROW Fee Only): How Much Already Spent as of 11-9-90: How Much Money to Finish Project: -4- 2 16 116 98 18 $ 4,114,165.00 $ 3,462,215.00 $ 651,950.00 I q- F - M - 1709 — WEST SECTION How Many Parcels on Project: How Many Parcels Closed as of 11-9-90: How Many Parcels Remain: Negotiation: Condemnation: Total Est. Cost (ROW Fee Only): How Much Already Spent as of 11-9-90: How Much Money to Finish Project: -5- 53 6 132 73 59 $ 5,996,040.00 $ 3,278,850.00 2,717,190.00 IJ . S . X WY _ 377 — SOUTH SECTION A How Many Parcels on Project: 40 How Many Parcels Closed as of 11-9-90: 29 How Many Parcels Remain: 3 + 8 condemnations = 11 Total Hat. Cost (ROW Fee Only): $ 2,425,913.00 How Much Already Spent as of 11-9-90: $ 10189,004.00 How Much Money to Finish Project: $ 1,236,909.00 -6- XXW"W . 377 — NORTH SECTION In How Many Parcels on Project: How Many Parcels Closed as of 11-9-90: How Many Parcels Remain: Total Est. Cost (ROW Fee Only): How Much Already Spent as of 11-9-90: Now Much Money to Finish Project: In 55 36 18 + 1 condemnation = 19 $ 2,584,835.00 $ 1,787,435.00 $ 797,400.00 S IJIVnVXA RY ESTIMATED RlMd•4I3STING EXPENDITURES 100% County C.R. 4118 (Timberlake) F.M. 156 (Blue Mound) F.M. 157 (Cooper Street F.M. 1709 - Bast F.M. 1709 - West 90% State - 10% County U.S. 377 South U.S. 377 North S.B. 360 South 100% $1,236,909.00 797,400.00 7 am FEE $ $ 57,250.00 12,550.00 132,050.00 651,950.00 2,717,190.00 $ 3,570,990.00 90% 10% $1,113,218.00 $123,691.00 717,660.00 79,740.00 TOTAL $203*431.00 � v Y 3tOW FUNDS IM 9919 9920 Available $ 3,683,000 $ 666,000 * Spent to Date 1,995,760 297,687 Remaining $ 106878240 $ 362,313 Needed to Finish 3/5700990 203t431 **Shortage (-2,883,750) $ 158,882 Bal. * Includes appraisal fees, condmnations, closings, etc. ** Fee simple only. Does not include any of the above. -9- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ORDINANCE NO. 480-B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING SECTION 4, "DEFINITIONS" TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 6, "NON -CONFORMING USES" BY RE -DEFINING THE TITLE TO THIS SECTION TO INCORPORATE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS; BY AMENDING SECTION 20 "C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT"; SECTION 24 "B-1 BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT"; SECTION 25, 11B-2 COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT"; SECTION 26, 11I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT"; SECTION 29, "MH MANUFACTURING HOUSING DISTRICT", BY AMENDING PERMITTED USES WITHIN THESE DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 32 11SP2 GENERALIZED SITE PLANNED DISTRICT", BY ALTERING AND CORRECTING CERTAIN PROCESSING REGULATIONS AND REVISING THE SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33, "SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS", BY ADDING ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS AND DELETING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE SECTION AND BY FURTHER INCORPORATING ORDINANCE NO. 514 INTO SAID SECTION BY SPECIFIC REFERENCE; BY AMENDING SECTION 34 "ACCESSORY USES" BY ADDING ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS OF SUCH USES AND AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS TO CLARIFY THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; BY AMENDING SECTION 35 "OFF-STREET PARKING", BY AMENDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID SECTION TO FURTHER CLARIFY THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF SAID SECTION; BY AMENDING SECTION 40 "SITE PLANS", BY AMENDING THE LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN VARIOUS SECTIONS RELATIVE TO REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLANS AND THE CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF VARIOUS PLAN SUBMITTALS; BY AMENDING SECTION 41 BY ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONTAINED ON CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTALS; BY AMENDING SECTION 43 "AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE" BY CREATING A NEW SUB- SECTION IN THE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ZONE SECTION INCORPORATING ORDINANCE NO. 479; BY AMENDING SECTION 44 "BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT", BY ADDING CS TO OUTSIDE STORAGE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS USE SECTION; BY AMENDING SECTION 45 "SPECIFIC USE PERMIT"; BY AMENDING THE LANGUAGE CONTAINED THEREIN TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT WITH CERTAIN STATE STATUTORY LANGUAGE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 CITY OF BOUTHrAKB, TEXAS Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 ?.0E i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOUTHL%U# TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 409, REQUIRIMS A !$E FOR ISSUANCX OF A PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A FOOD SERVICE OrERATIONr PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BN CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OrFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN SFPXCTIVE DATE. AREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its chaiter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas has designated, by Ordinance No. 409, the Tarrant County Health Department as the City's health authority for the purpose of insuring minimum standards of environmental health and sanitation within the City's Jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 14 of Ordinance No. 409 provides for the fees to be charged for the issuance of permits under the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the Tarrant County Health Department desire to annually adopt the amount of the permit fees to be charged; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the Tarrant County Health Department have entered into an Interlocal Contract to amend the fees set out in ordinance No. 409. NOW, TRERZrORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOUTHLRKE, TEXAS s s t ekaXfoodserv. ord -� - I . WELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.07 SECTION 1 That Section 14 of ordinance No. 409 be amended to read as follows: "Section 14. permit Fees. The following fees shall be charged for permits required under this ordinance until such fees are amended by minute order or resolution of the City Council: (a) Eood Establishments - A fee of $150.00 shall be charged for each food service and retail food establishment that engages in food preparation. (b) Temporary Permit Fees - A fee of $35.00 shall be charged for a temporary health permit for any food establishment operating less than fourteen (14) days. (c) A fee of $100.00 shall be charged annually for each retail food establishment that does not engage in food preparation. (d) The above fees shall be paid to the Tarrant County Health Department, 1800 University Drive, Fort Worth, Texas. (e) Exemption from Fees - Non-profit facilities shall be required to make application for a permit hereunder, but shall be exempt from payment of the permit fee. (f) No permit or fee shall be required under this ordinance for the sale of produce by an individual on the premises upon which such produce is grown." SECTION 2 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 409 remain in full force and effect until otherwise amended. •lake%feedico,v.ord .2. 0 FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 ?.02 SECTION 9 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the rer.►aining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION l Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION S All rights and remedies of the City of Southlaka are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of all ordinances regulating the operation of food service establishments which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this sl��e�foodse*v.ord -1 FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.03 ordinan ce but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SyrCTION i The City Secretary of the City of Southiak e is hereby directed its caption and penalty to publish the proposed ordinance or Public out the time and place for a p together with a notice setting s Mare the second reading hearing thereon at least ten (la) day rovides for the of this: ordinance, and if this ordinance P fine or forfeiture for any violation of imposition of any penalty, any of its provisions, than the City Secretary shall additionally City newspaper one time n the°ffil publish this ordinance ihisordinance, as required by Pa of t within ten days after P City of southlake. Section 3.13 of the Charter of they SECTION 7 shall pe in full force and effect from and This ordinance fired by law, and it is so after its passage and publication as requ ordained. DAY O1 pUSED UM AppaOVED ON FIRS 'Z' gEADxNG ON THIS 1990. YOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -4- alek6\f0qdg9rv.erd 8 E'-IELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.04 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: slskoVoadserv.ard -5- November 8, 1990 Honorable Mr. Gary Fickes Mayor of City of Southlake, Texas Honorable City Councilmembers City of Southlake, Texas 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Resignation from Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas MA n, ��7: �s NOV 1 OFFICE Or CITY SECRF T ARY Extensive business travel and project development activities since May of this year have prevented the complete execution of responsibilities assigned to me as a member of the Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission. With no apparent break in this schedule in the foreseeable future, I find it necessary to submit my resignation for the appointment to the Planning and Zoning Commission received in May, 1989. However, if in the future subsequent business travel on my part is substantially reduced, I request that my credentials and willingness to be an active member of the Planning and Zoning Commission be taken into account in the event appointees are in order. Thank you for your patience and consideration on behalf of the City of Southlake. Very truly, ime's W. Devine, P.E. cc: J. Wright, Chairman of Planning and Zoning Commission 010260 3-/ MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORTS OCTOBER 1990 Utility............................................4-1 Street.............................................4-5 Zoning.............................................4-/ Building...........................................4-8 Parks and Recreation...............................4-11 Municipal Court....................................4-12 Public Safety.......................................4-15 Finance.............................................4-48 F VIIY v1 VV 4a111Q I��j1 I VnaJ M E M O R A N D U M November 12, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Water Department Monthly Report - October 1990 The enclosed report details the Water Department activities for the month of October 1990. This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their November 20, 1990 meeting. MHB/lc ►I City of Southtake, Texas — MEMORANDUM i November 9, 1990 TO: Michael H. Barnes FROM: Ron Morain SUBJECT: Water Department monthly report for October 1990. The Water Department obtained water station meter readings daily, sampled water and received satisfactory bacteria reports for all samples for the month and maintained system levels and flows without problems for the month. We repaired three water main breaks, made 22 taps, located 127 valves which were exercised and boxes raised to ground level and made 5 line locates for construction contractors. Sewer plants were operated and maintained with required reports to the State within our permit parameters. Routine equipment maintenance was performed as required and all vehicles were winterized. Assistance was provided to street repairs activities as needed as well as to the meter reader. �4cb MONTHLY REPORT SEND REPORT TO: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF WATER HYGIENE WATER WORKS OPERATION FOR 1100 WEST 49th STREET GROUND WATER SUPPLIES AUSTIN. TEXAS 78756-3192 ) Name of System CITY OF SOUTHLAKE County TARRANT (1al Wate System LD. No 7 N 6.w o) 551t � Disinfection CorrosionControl ® 11 1 MWIMI - ��-- ••=was , -■ No. of Active Water Services (10) 2,197 Chemical Analysis (11) 11-83 Dates and Results of Distribution Bacteriological Analyses (12) 10 -11-90 8 SAMPLES - NEGATIVE Dates and Results of Raw Unchlorinated Well Water Samples (13) NONE Reservoirs or Tanks Cleaned (14) R - A 7 Dead Ends Flushed (15) NQNE General Remarks (16) Submitted By (17) FORM NO. E 3 Certificate No. (18) 4 n - 3i - 2 306 All re due by the 15th of the following month. -3 5/88 11 UTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH OCTOBER 1990 GALLONS PUMPED THIS MONTH FROM WELLS PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 32,851,000 32,851,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 0 NEW WATER TAPS INSTALLED 22 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 0 METER CHANGE OUTS 3 ADDRESSES: 2202 SHADOW CREEK/1635 S. BRUMLOW/209 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. PULLED METERS PER CUSTOMER REQUEST PULLED METERS PER DELINQUENT PAYMENT LOCKED METERS PER CUSTOMER REQUEST LOCKED METERS PER DELINQUENT PAYMENT PROCESSED WORK ORDERS I WATER MAIN BREAK REPAIRS E. DOVE/RAINBOW/GINGER COURT SEWER LINE REPAIRS 0 FLUSHED WATER LINES 0 �:... _t n_...��_�._ •r_..�_ City of Southlake, Texas v MEMORANDUM November 12, 1990 1D: Michael H. Barnes FRC M: Ron Morain SUBJECT: Street Department monthly report for October 1990. Repair work continued on Summerplace and street is now ready for curb replacement. Routine patch schedule was continued with all streets receiving pothole patching as needed using approximately 175 tons of asphalt. The gradall was used to clean approximately 2500 feet of ditch lines on Continental and Sam School Road. These projects are of a continuing nature and projected for completion in November. Major potholes were cut out on North Kimball Avenue, rock was placed in cuts and patches repaired to correct various failures in the street. Assistance was provided to aid progress in construction of the City Hall addition. The sewer line was relocated to allow* for the future connection to city sewer, a pad was poured to relocate air conditioner condensors and water line was relocated under addition. Barricades were maintained during the rains early in the month and top soil removed from Dove Creek Trail that washed down from Chapel Downs. Three culverts were cleaned to facilitate drainage during the rains. Routine maintenance was performed on equipment as required and all the vehicles were winterized this month. s RM cbk 44 G ZONING DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE For the Month Ending 31 October 1990 Zoning $ 100.00 No. of Cases (1) Platting 5,670.00 No. of Cases (6) Board of Adjustment 150.00 (Includes Appeal, Special Exception Use, and Variance Requests) No. of Cases (3) Specific Use Permit No. of Cases Site Plans No. of Cases Misc. Income 208.00 (Includes Maps and Ordinance Copies) No. of Receipts (15) Total Revenue Total No. of Receipts $6,128.00 (25) E+ 0`4V�000W WLOV)000 WV) OM N 0 O Vi N "I HV mNc1O00O co t-NNOO')C) � W C)N9 rl O O N M W H �W W E4 �-C OOtf)O[-.-I COriNMOLOrl 00 Ol- 'w O M rl FO ce) N cM N M co C) LO rl LO N V• ri dA OOCl) V) WNN W tt)NC)LnO uo0 ON 0 r-i ri W A C{N N + Cl LOO cr)C1 (00 .-i � O V) Fi Ia E• x ti� JY � c x 8 o a 0 o 2 a ►, � E+ rn U cC c>~ W a it W.1 V OOOW W LO V•O O O W Vr O M N O 1-4 O fONH000MNm0.-10 � V� ON H O O O 1-1 Doll C�NNOWo mn MActQ0 m 0 r-4co OA ri O O N N - q w agi $4 Uhl W U) W P4 i I o U) U O v1 VUl r-I m cq N r CD Vi I r/ CM 0 14: dac r Ip p r ca E+ 0 m EE++ W E4 w W a 0 U k7 w F14 02 I d1 p rl vc 9888888 oN8888 88 88 8 8 8 8 �N ...o N cq ... .g .� Co ri ri Soo 00 •� •H 00 10N8888 88 88 8 8 8 8 rriM� 00CCl •� •N N S O N N r; N .-I rl S 8p8p8888 NSS888 8p8 88 8 8 8 8 � NMNN008O �ti8 �N to •M � 4 C� I- N CD " 00 CG rl M CC CO to CD CD M N .-1 N CD 0) CD M .-4 t-SCODIf)OSLO M SSSS 88 SM t u� N rI�MS Ntn OOONdO' N � E- N 00 M � OOCMMO N 00sA0 rl N N M N .-I rl N N rl 1-4 8888888 ocol 88 88 8 8 8 8 o an .Cl)* ooN .g .r Cl) rl In O N 00 N ri r✓ ri CD .-4 r-I "088888 " 8 8 8 8 8 88 88 8 8 8 8 r1 Ili N C In N r-1 C+7 r] ."1 888A N8888 88 88 8 8 8 8 ui M NM •O •�tNDCD •� t!� O [� rl N CM N ri rl N M O �� �� � � Ew•� z i4 U) o 0 0 F 0 N CM O N M O C to M a Way g8g888888 8 8 8 w NNE �I -I LO � 8888888 8 8 �QHU cCDt- § ti H rM-4 LO V1 .m (y N 1-4 O E' r1 ,yi A E-+ U W a a N�88885S8�(8ppp 8 8 0b8&� >d MNO.H-INOOII W �BNC�i)O E• A I- CO int- M .-1 00 N V7 00 00 CO NON v N co .CY)�-1 E� 4�9 ri 'd� .N-1 a N rn U E a a• �O�OOM00pp0 O O N k >4 4c m G) 'T M O dm M co m O Q M 11 00 I It O O O t- N co O O 8 ��0pp0 O Mp co Io VJ MF., tt-N NO�O N N {� N r-I H co � w a `" O o H 8 Ha 8888888 8 8 8 00 `-0"'`°It- �NIM ` a0 t` M M N -4 O 0 -1 N 1-4 � CO W Cry U a oe w 0 a a w x N 8888888 8 8 8 ��t�(D co IN 640 gig MH 8888888 8 8 8 � �1s c j(D H �s tu-; g r N M n i 2 V) N rl O H 44 V CMJ 'O' A H rq W in ra —i Q ci OCC . 0 0 CD 0 0 O LJ6J LL. . . . • . O J C r+ H N J F— Q V un CC CO O �W S O 000 O J .N.. H O O LO 1� - 00 HC) C LAJW h— 00 000 00 O Q h— C 4n Q O C � ¢ O g00 00 O N D O O O O S O ~ ~ O L LJ Y !— O ~ W W F—C CC cr.O W N 0 y. w g} 00 000 00 O CO 000 00 0 O 4 = m CD WF-- UO � CD N J .:I-~.. v Q a $o $oCD 00 0 0 o NZ . • . O M SOO 00 O NF=- QO O H LO Z O cq F— itlie� Z OOOW Z JJ—i= O W W W d ar NC snU-U- �O an J HQN W F—JJJJ Wi—W J Q to C9Z =ww =JJJW coor. QQ~ CiZ...J =w i-- ...me�ot� RCN O J J City of Southlake, Texas HAWK, CITY MANAGER [INKL,E, MUNICIPAL C. -- -- IAL COURT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR OCTOBER :R 16, 1990 14 wry or sommaKe, t exas MUNICIPAL COW M211MY REPORT M2M OF October 190 MCf?g OF October ' 8 01 *Cases Set For Trail 124 131 *Cases Heard 82 79 Cases Dismissed 28 7 Cases Reset 9 15 Cases Appealed 145 67 Past Due Letters 34 44 Cases Refered to D►9C 54 16 Citations Issued 612 428 Citations Paid 289 169 *Fines Collected Fram Court $2,982.50 $1 365.00 Total Revenue $19 ,138. 50 $17 009.75 * 2 Plea Courts a Month * 2 Trial Courts a Month * Total Money Collected in Four (4) Courts NOTE: For October of '90 we had 2 Plea dockets and V-13 1 Trial docket. SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT WARRANT OFFICE MONTHLY REPORT OCTOBER, 1990 MUNICIPAL WARRANTS CURRENT MONTH PAST MONTH YTD WARRANTS ON HAND Beginning Count 571 572 N/A Received 83 53 861 Served 52 54 677 Purged 0 0 452 Ending Count 602 571 N/A FINES COLLECTED By Warrant Officer 4,645 4,528 69,195 By Other Agency 4,496 2,859 27,584 Total 9,141 7,387 96,779 ARREST/WARRANTS SERVED By Warrant Officer 23 38 470 By Other Agency 29 16 207 Total 52 54 677 V-/V SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT 1 /44 - FIRE SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT October, 1990 *Prevention Age Group PREVENTION ACTIVITIES Class Number -Students Reached Totals 0-5 223 6-12 1,822 13-18 0 Adult 74 *Inspections/Plan Review Inspections Commercial/Mercantile 8 Industrial 1 Assembly 0 Residential 0 TOTAL 9 *Incidence Response Structure Fire Automobile Fire Brush/Grass Fire MVA Good Intent False Alarm Mutual -Aid Given Received Medical Assistance Hazardous Materials Smoke Scare Rescue Call TOTAL Plan Review Commercial/Mercantile 2 Industrial 1 Assembly 0 Residential 0 Subdivision Review 0 Pre -fire Planning/Engine Engine Company Inspection 0 TOTAL 3 FIRE SUPPRESSION ACTIVITIES Fire Exposure N/A 0 Fire Loss $21.00 0 2 Equipment Used 7 Engines 17 10 Attack 22 3 Ladder 1 Ambulance 30 1 Grass/Brush Unit 5 1 Feet of hose used: 10 Reel 1 1-3/4 220, 3 2-1/2- 2 5 40 Ladders used (feet ground ladder EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ACTIVITIES ,Calls -for -Service Transport 15 No Transport 15 TOTAL 30 Type of Call Medical Emergency Cardiac 1 Respiratory 0 Sick Call 7 Neurological 2 TOTAL 10 Trauma Emergency Injured Person 6 Motor Vehicle Accident 9 Industrial Accident 0 TOTAL 15 Equipment Used Ambulance Miles Traveled 890 Monitor/Difibulator 7 Thumper 0 Suction 0 I.V. Therapy 8 Spinal Immobilzer 8 Traction Splinting 0 Bandaging 1 Splinting 4 Intubation 1 Drug Therapy 1 Oxygen Therapy 11 Training CPR - Classes Taught 3 Total Students 35 R$w Date: 11/01/90 Page 1 Report Nabr: OFF0300 OFFENSES BY OFFENSE DESCRIPTION FROM 10/01/90 TO 10/31/90 Offense Offense Officer Property Date Number Detective Stolen POE NOE Status Offenses for ABANDONED VEHICLE 10/09/90 900973 144 / 0 0 A Offenses for A66 ASSAULT 10/12/90 900982 146 / 140 0 0 CA Offenses for ASSAULT W/BODILY INJURY 10/27/90 901040 141 / 133 0 0 A Offenses for ASSIST OTHER AGENCY 10/03/90 900954 108 / 0 0 C Offenses for ATT SUICIDE 10/21/90 901018 141 / 0 0 C 10/24190 301023 108 / 0 0 A kmenws for AUTO THEFT 10/24/90 901027 141 ! 140 D 0 0 U Offenses for BURGLARY (8) 10/02/90 900950 143 / 133 FEK 3 51 A 10/15/90 900996 146 / 140 K 14 75 A Offenses for BURGLARY (R) 10/01/90 900948 111 / 140 ABK 25 65 A 10/04/90 900960 134 / 140 BK 1 55 A 10/11/90 900976 144 / 133 F 2 55 A 10/14/90 900992 143 / 133 K 6 90 A 10/15/90 900999 134 / 140 1 25 65 A 10/16/90 901003 134 / F 1 65 A Offenses for BURGLARY M/V 10/06/90 900962 119 / 140 K 0 0 CA 10/28/90 901046 143 / 140 F 0 0 A Offenses for CINS 10/18/90 901008 140 / 140 0 0 A 10/21/90 901017 145 / 0 0 C Offenses for CREDIT CARD ABUSE 9/08/90 w 900972 134 / 133 0 0 A Offenses for CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 10/12/90 900981 146 / 140 0 0 CA 10/03/90 900955 119 / 140 0 0 A y-1 7 Report Date: 11/01/90 Page 2 Report Nmbr: OFF0300 OFFENSES BY OFFENSE DESCRIPTION FROM 10/01/90 TO 10/31/90 Offense Offense Officer Property Date Number Detective Stolen POE MOE Status Offenses for CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 10/12/90 900977 146 / 140 0 0 CA 10/12/90 900980 146 / 140 0 0 CA 10/15/90 900998 144 / 133 0 0 A 10/12/90 900979 146 / 140 0 0 CA 10/12/90 900978 146 / 140 0 0 CA 10/17/90 901004 143 / 140 0 0 A 10/12/90 900983 143 / 140 0 0 CA 10/27/90 901041 141 / 140 0 0 A 10/27/90 901042 141 / 0 0 A 10/29/90 901053 134 / 133 0 0 A Offenses for CRIMINAL TRESPASS 10/02/90 900952 143 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for DISORDERLY CONDUCT 10/30/90 901056 134 / 0 0 CA Offenses far DISTURBANCE 10/02/90 900953 134 / 133 0 0 A Offenses for D06 BITE 10/28/90 901047 143 / 133 0 0 A Offenses for DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 10/28/90 901043 108 / 0 0 C Offenses for DWI 10/20/90 901016 111 J 140 0 0 CA 10/26/90 901035 111 / 140 0 0 CA Offenses for FAIL TO MAINTAIN RECORDS 10/30/90 901054 140 / 140 0 0 CA Offenses for FOUND PROPERTY 10/22/90 901021 143 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for HARASSMENT 10/02/90 90MI 143 / 133 0 0 A 10/08/90 900970 134 / 140 0 0 A 10/26/90 901034 141 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for HIT & RUN ACCIDENT 10/06/90 900994 134 / 140 0 0 A �`D R r►s Date: 11/01/90 Page 3 Report Nebr: OFF0300 OFFENSES BY OFFENSE DESCRIPTION FROM 10/01/90 TO 10/31/90 Offense Offense Officer Property Date Nusber Detective Stolen POE NOE Status Offenses for INJURED PERSON 10/01/90 900947 134 / 0 0 C 10/08/90 900971 134 / 140 0 0 A 10/20/90 901015 141 / 0 0 C Offenses for LEAVING THE SCENE OF ACCIDENT 10/31/90 901058 141 / 0 0 A Offenses for MINOR CONSUMING ALCOHOL 10/13/90 900989 108 / 0 0 C Offenses for PI 10/06/90 900961 146 / 0 0 CA 10/01/90 900965 108 / 0 0 CA 10/26/90 901037 146 / 0 0 CA ?127i90 901033 146 ;' 0 0 CA 0/28i90 901044 146 ; 0 0 CA Offenses for POSS ALCOHOL U/21 10i26/90 901036 146 i 0 0 CA Offenses for FOSS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 10/19/90 901010 147 / 140 0 0 CA 10/26/90 901030 147 / 140 0 0 CA Offenses for POSS MARIJUANA 10/07/90 900967 139 / 133 0 0 CA Offenses for RECKLESS DRIVING 10/14/90 900990 146 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for RUNAWAY 10/06/90 900964 134 / 133 0 0 C Offenses for SEXUAL ASSAULT 10/26/90 901032 144 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE 10/04/90 900957 108 / 0 0 C Of ~Rses for THEFT 20/200 /12/90 900985 143 / 133 I 0 0 A 10/14/90 900993 139 / 140 K 0 0 A 10/12/90 900984 144 / 140 I 0 0 CA 10/19/90 901011 144 / 140 K 0 0 A � /7 R► Date: 11/01/90 Page 4 Report Nebr: OFF0300 OFFENSES BY OFFENSE DESCRIPTION FROM 10/01/10 TO 10/31/90 Offense Offense Officer Property Date Nusber Detective Stolen POE HOE Status Offenses for THEFT 20/200 10/24/90 901025 144 / 140 K 0 0 A 10/26/90 901033 141 / 140 K 0 0 A 10/28/90 901045 119 / 140 K 0 0 A Offenses for THEFT 200/750 10/14/90 900991 143 / 133 K 0 0 A 10/24/90 901024 108 / 140 K 0 0 A Offenses for THEFT 750/20,000 10/09/90 900974 144 1 140 K 0 0 CA 10/03/90 900956 141 1 140 F 0 0 U 10/16/90 901002 141 / 140 BK 0 0 A 10/20/90 901014 141 / 140 K 0 0 A l0/20/90 901013 141 / 140 K. 0 0 A 22/'90 901019 143 1 140 K 0 0 A 10/31/90 901057 144 ! 140 8 0 0 A Offenses for THEFT U/20 10/04/90 900959 144 / 13S A 0 0 A 10/29/90 901052 134 / 140 0 0 A Offenses for TRF VIOLATION 10/07/90 900968 111 / 0 0 CA 10/11/90 900975 139 / 0 0 CA 10/15/90 900997 143 / 0 0 CA 10/15/90 900995 108 / 0 0 CA 10/18/90 901007 139 / 0 0 CA 10/18/90 901006 139 / 0 0 CA 10/25/90 901029 139 / 0 0 CA 10/29/90 901051 139 / 0 0 CA 10/30/90 901055 146 / 0 0 CA Offenses for TRF URNT ARREST 10/01/90 900945 139 / 0 0 CA 10/01/90 900946 139 / 0 0 CA 10/02/90 900949 108 / 0 0 CA 10/04/90 900958 139 / 0 0 CA 10/06/90 900963 145 / 0 0 CA 10/07/90 900%6 139 / 0 0 CA 10/08/90 "0%9 139 / 0 0 CA /12/90 900966 146 / 0 0 CA 10/13/90 900988 141 / 0 0 CA 10/16/90 901000 146 / 0 0 CA 10/16/90 901001 134 / 0 0 CA 404 Date: 11/01/90 Page 5 Report Nmbr: OFF0300 OFFENSES BY OFFENSE DESCRIPTION FROM 10/01/90 TO 10/31/90 Offense Offense Officer Property Date Number Detective Stolen POE NOE Status Offenses for TRF WRNT ARREST 10/17/90 901005 145 / 0 0 CA 10/18/90 901009 141 / 0 0 CA 10/20/90 901012 146 / 0 0 CA 10/22/90 901020 139 / 0 0 CA 10/23/90 901022 143 / 0 0 CA 10/25/90 901028 145 / 0 0 CA 10/24/90 901026 145 / 0 0 CA 10/26/90 901031 119 / 0 0 CA 10/29/90 901049 108 / 0 0 CA 10/29/90 901050 139 / 0 0 CA Offenses for WARRANT ARREST 10/13/90 900987 111 / 0 0 CA 10/27/90 901039 140 / 0 0 CA )/19/90 901048 108 i 0 0 CA Total Offenses Printed: 114 Arrests 63 Accidents 20 Alarm Calls 82 q-ai SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION SUMMARY OCTOBER 1990 J `v a CALLS FOR SERVICE 706 CITATIONS 635 PATROL 295 S.T.E.P. 340 ARRESTS h 1 FELONY 1 M SD ACCIDENTS 19 SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT WARRANT OFFICE MONTHLY REPORT OCTOBER, 1990 MUNICIPAL WARRANTS CURRENT MONTH PAST MONTH YTD WARRANTS ON HAND Beginning Count 571 572 N/A Received 83 53 861 Served 52 54 677 Purged 0 0 452 Ending Count 602 571 N/A FINES COLLECTED By Warrant Officer 4,645 4,528 69,195 By Other Agency 4,496 2,859 27,584 Total 9,141 7,387 96,779 ._Lz_-'�V ' By Warrant Officer 23 38 470 By Other Agency 29 16 207 Total 52 54 677 `f o? 3 -N,,175 T IGAT7C`N DIVISI,--N MONTHLY REPORT OCT`� BER 19 9 0 NEW CASES ASSIGNED —59_ CURRENT ACTIVE CASES _64_ CASES CLEARED: 77:;- ARRE,�7 WARRANTS OBTAINED —b_ ARREST WARRANTS SERVED —5_ GENERAL ACTIVITY: MEETINGS ATTENDED _6_ SURVEILLANCE TIME (approx) _4_hr PUBLIC SPEECHES/PRESENTATIONS _0_ CRIME SCENES WORKED _6_ SEIZURES FILED _0_ VALUE $ 0 SCHOOL/TRAINING SESSIONS _0_ v_ ay D.A.R.E./SPECIAL SERVICES OCT: OCTOBER ACTIVITY REPORT 1 Core -Johnson Elem. 87 core students 2 Visitation -Johnson Elem. 64 visitation students security survey 3 Core -Carroll Elem. 71 core students 4 Visitation -Carroll Middle 42 visitation students 5 Administrative Day 8 Core -Johnson Elem. 87 core students 9 Visitation -Johnson Elem. 64 visitation students Visitation -Carroll Elem. 43 visitation students security survey 10 Core -Carroll Elem. 71 core students security survey 11 Visitation -Carroll Middle 42 visitation students 12 Administrative Day Meeting at Grapevine P.D. 13 Girl Scout Troop/Bike Safety 14 Lecture/ White Chapel Meth. 15 Core -Johnson Elem. 87 Core students Visitation Johnson Elem 16 Administrative Day 17 Core -Carroll Elem. 71 Core students 18 Meeting in Dallas Juvenile matter for #140 19 Administrative Day 22 Core -Johnson Elem. 87 core students Visitation -Johnson Elem. 38 visitation students 23 Visitation -Johnson Elem. 64 visitation students 24 Core -Carroll Elem. 71 core students 25 Visitation -Carroll Middle 47 visitation students 26 Administrative Day 29 Core -Johnson Elem. 87 core students Visitation -Johnson Elem. 39 visitation students 30 Visitation -Johnson Elem. 60 visitation students 31 Core -Carroll Elem. 71 core students Al-.O;z to D.A.R.E. 87 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS ,,,,,,, M. Bedri ch #142 10-1-90 Officer/Instructor Day of Wee Johnson Elem Mrs. Cousins School Principal 1300 N. Carroll Mrs. Stansell Address Office Manager 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes 5 No. of 6th grade classes TIME 0830 - 0930 0930 - 1030 1330 - 1430 1430 - 1520 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM i 5/Core 5/Core 5/Core 5/Core TEACHER Mrs Jacobsen D.A.R.E. VTSTTATTnN OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE 'OTAL CORE STUDENTS M. 8 e d r i c h Officer/Instructor y of wee inns iTVfelro >i - n 1300 N. Carroll Address Telephone No. of kindergarten classes_ No. of 1st grade classes - _ No. of 2nd grade classes S No. of 3rd grade classes GRADE/ROOM # K f K - A Nutrition to Lunch to rinc pa Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes No. of 5th grade classes 4_ No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes �a� TEACHER D.A.R.E. 71 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL GORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor My of Wee Carroll School 1705 4. Continental Address No. of kindergarten classes_ No. of lst grade classes 3_ No. of 2nd grade classes 3 No. of 3rd grade classes 3 TIME 0900 - 0940' GRADE/ROOM # 5JC�ra Mr-, Hgnrjpr-�QN Princi pa Mr.$ Williams Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes_,_ No. of 5th grade classes No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes Nutrition to Lunch to tyL u TEACHER D.A.R.E. VISITATION. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE_ roTAL CORE STUDENTS �w M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Day -of Week Carroll Middle School 1100 N. Carroll Address 481-2183 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes No. of lst grade classes No. of 2nd grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes Principal Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes No. of 5th grade classes No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TIME GRADE/ROOM f TEACHER 1015 - 1110 6/15 Mrs^ c+a,.;av2+ 2' 1215 - 1300 6/15 Mrs. Stewart 20 L Nutrition to Lunch to �4- 3 0 D.A.R.E. 87 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS �w M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Day of Wee Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of lst grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 ,. TIME 1 1• 0930 - 1030 pmwffimc 1430 - 1520 GRADE/ROOM # rinc pa Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes No. of 5th grade classes 4_ No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes L Nutrition to Lunch to 3 1 TEACHER D.A.R.E. VISITATION. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Day of wee Johnson Elem School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 TIME 0830 - 0900 1000 - 1030 1045 - 1115 GRADE/ROOM 4/401 Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes_5_ No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes r Nutrition to Lunch to c/-- .3vZ TEACHER VISITATION D.A.R.E. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE_ row CORE STUDENTS �w M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Carroll Elem. School 1705 W. Continental Address 481-8899 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 2 No. of lst grade classes 3 No. of 2nd grade classes 3 No. of 3rd grade classes 3 fir► TIME 1245 - 1330 GRADE/ROOM f —KIFAILSFIL911� �.y of Week u .-fi.- •. Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes_ No. of 5th grade classes 3— No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes Nutrition to Lunch to 4-3 3 TEACHER D.A.R.E. 71 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS L M. Bedrich Officer/ Instructor Day of Week Carroll Elem. School 1705 W. Continental Address 481-8899 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes_ u -rs.- .. IIIIIII Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes-_ No. of 1st grade classes 3 No. of 5th grade classes No. of 2nd grade classes 3 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes 3 No. of 6th grade classes TIME GRADE/ROOM TEACHER 0815 - 0900 5/Corp Mr(;- NPath 0900 - 0945 0945 - 1030 Nutrition to Lunch to �4-3y D.A.R.E. VISITATION_ OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Carroll Middle School 1100 N. Carroll Address 481-2183 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes No. of 1st grade classes No. of 2nd grade classes y of Wee Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes No. of 5th grade classes No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TIME GRADE/ROOM f TEACHER 0815 - 0910 6/AL Mrs ;IAidprgkj 22 1215 - 1310 6/AL Mrc Swidegs Li 29 L Nutrition to Lunch to 4 35-- D.A.R.E. 87 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOIAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Johnson-Elem. School 1300 N.-Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 TIME 0830 - 0930 0930 - 1030 1330 - 1430 1430 - 1520 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM 5/Core ---1-0/15/90 y of Week Mrs Cous-ions r nc pa Mrs Stansell Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5- No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER Mrs. Jacobsen 174-36 D.A.R.E. VISITATION OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich 10 15 90 Officer/Instructor Day of wee Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 �w TIME 1215 - 1245 1300 - 1330 �w Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM # 1/102 3/305 Mrs. Cousin s Principal Mrs. Stansell Mice Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes �4--3 7 TEACHER Mrs Miller 21 Mrs Campbell 18 D.A.R.E. 71 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDS S L_ M. B drirh officer/Instructor y of Week Carroll Elem- School 1705 W. Continental Address No. of kindergarten classes 2 No. of lst grade classes 3 Principal Mrs Wi-1 1 i ams Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 4 No. of 5th grade classes 3 No. of 2nd grade classes 3 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes 3 No. of 6th grade classes TIME GRADE/ROOM # TEACHER �r 0815 - 0900 S-/Cnra Mrs ycdth Nutrition to Lunch to Y3,k 87 D.A.R.E. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE 10tAL CORE STUDENTS Officer/Instructor Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 �,,,, TIME 0830 - 0930 0930 - 1030 1330 - 1430 1430 - 1520 GRADE/ROOM f 5/Core m 10/22/90 y of Wee Mrs Co_usions Principal Mrs Stansell Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER Mrs Jacobsen Nutrition to Lunch to Ll— 3 O.A.R.E. VISITATION OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich 10/22/90 Officer/Instructor Day of Wee Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of lst grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 TIME 1215 - 124S Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM 1 /in-i Mrs Cousions r nc pa Mrs Stansell Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes Y6 TEACHER D.A.R.E. VTSTTATTftN OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS Officer/instructor 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes No. of 1st grade classes No. of 2nd grade classes c No. of 3rd grade classes -- err TIME 0830 - 0900 1000 - 1030 1045 - 1115 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM # aiani 4/402 4/403 Principal Mrs. Williams Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes r- No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER Mrs Lowery 22 Mrs Anders 22 z/- VI 71 D.A.R.E. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE IOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Carroll Elem. School 1705 W. Continental Address 481-8899 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes__ No. of lst grade classes 3_ No. of 2nd grade classes 3_ No. of 3rd grade classes I — TIME 0815 - 0900 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM 10/24/90 y of Week Mrs Henderson Principal Mrs Williams Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes_ No. of Sth grade classes -- No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER Mrc Haath Al— q ;L D.A.R.E. VISITATTON. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE 101AL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Carroll Middle School 1100 N. Carroll Address 481-2183 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes No. of 1st grade classes No. of 2nd grade classes Mr Wj1kjn;gq Principal Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes No. of Sth grade classes No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 3rd grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TIME GRADE/ROOM f TEACHER 0815 - 0910 7419 MrS Sm.31 1 f rig 1$ �w Nutrition to Lunch to 4V- v 3 D.A.R.E. 87 OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. edrich in 1,2ql�Q Officer/Instructor y of Week Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 TIME 0830 - 0930 0930 - 1030 1330 - 1430 1430 - 1520 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM f 5/Core Mrs Cousions rinc pa Mrs Stansell Of?ice Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER Mrs Jacobsen II V- H VISITATION D.A.R.E. _OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOTAL CORE STUDENTS M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor y of Week Johnson Elem. School 1705 W. Continental Address 481-8899 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 2 No. of lst grade classes 3 No. of 2nd grade classes 3 No. of 3rd grade classes 3 ,, TIME 1130 - 1200 1300 - 1330 Nutrition to Lunch to GRADE/ROOM # 1 / 05 Mrs- rmlsinn5— r nc pa Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes_ No. of 5th grade classes —1— No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes TEACHER ,/_ vs_ VISITATION D.A.R.E. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE TOIAL CORE STUDENTS �w M. Bedrich Officer/Instructor Johnson Elem. School 1300 N. Carroll Address 481-2184 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 5 No. of 1st grade classes 5 No. of 2nd grade classes 5 No. of 3rd grade classes 5 ,, TIME 0830 - 0900 1045 - 1115 1130 - 1200 Nutrition to Lunch to 10/30/90 'DWy of Week Mrs Cousions rinc pa Mrs Sta-nsell Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 5 No. of 5th grade classes 4 No. of 5/6 grade classes No. of 6th grade classes GRADE/ROOM # TEACHER 3/305 Mrs Campbell 18 4/404 Mrs Hix 20 4/403 Mrs Anders 22 //— i/ t-., � I 71 TOTALCORE STUDENTS D.A.R.E. OFFICER/INSTRUCTOR SCHEDULE_ M. Bedrich 10/31/90 Officer/Instructor Day o ee Carroll Elem. School 1705 W. Continental Address 481-8899 Telephone No. of kindergarten classes 2 No. of lst grade classes 3 No. of 2nd grade classes 3 Mrs Henderson r nc pa Mrs Williams Office Manager No. of 4th grade classes 4 No. of 5th grade classes 3 No. of 5/6 grade classes 3 No. of 3rd grade classes 3 No. of 6th grade classes ,,,„ TIME GRADE/ROOM # TEACHER 0815 - 0900 5/Core Mrs HPa.h INMEMMIS / • I• - Nutrition to Lunch to /-/— X/ 7 fY xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxx:x xxxxxxxx� a OMOMf-f-,ONO.•L OOMMPNP.D.•.Of�V�ONOMr. P.•a LA I� M -4 Pei f.OCF. OM C MJ�OJ NLA P.r�p J1�M1Af�.-�OOfT.••�f�OMNNNO�I N.O J.� rA �WM.-�COPM w L OOO�O LAN ODD �D OHO 1fl JPP�ONONMOLA �O Of�OMM1�MN LA �D �OJPOf�O N I r cv I I .+ . pn MN.r ^ INN 1 1 N a A IL UI Y C 7 O u u < d w � o a x LO LA LAOOMO�DMOOS01OPNPNNSSPMMPNtl11�0.rLAJON •V JP-OLn LANOO.-LN MI�LflPubIIJONfOOv+OPJPJO(OSOOM C 41 W f�nOMr-ILANJNI�P OLA f►PPLAJ MtAf+NJNPPMOPLA.•rOM Ems+ -01-.-L.1 tO JT-A Df- 1 NJ f- M1f- f�- "r-. r-- LA.a LAM PO.C,/�bM Tq NM�ONOI�.aSOMJ.D�Jr+O."100JI�N O�OMPP000.� .D J qC a .-LO f�JJSOOhJPONP�DOMO.L.OMf�M O.••L O1�0.•+.DO .D O MNN%T �,D NJ P bJ CO 1` M N'D.a N b P M w CO OM .+ Pr b co .b 4040 .bb - -bbb b -b bbb bb P PN N LA �ONN J M b r••L . b b M1 b b b b b b co b b N �700NNPf�.O1�O0LAN�P.DO P/�f�1�NMOJOPJLA Nf�-a0 L ONONJfOOSOhOMNOMP NIl1M PNOO ODD N N M O M N C! J n J C. . . . . . 61 v J M fuLn v1,O O M� S 1f1 f,-.O.'+ 2;+ N O N co 011101f1 M O M 000111 J N 1J E;+ MPOJOOONO.+ LA LA I-. M O LA I�.a P.a f� co M LA a � OP.a~-OOQ TA NSNO OLl1PJJ%a%a M co M J O LA Ln f� J LA D-+%D LA M O Ln LA co P P.O M m Cl a M.OSNJO1:nf:Ofz JONO.-LLA N�aOMMM.••L.•+LA .a M.-LI�JOn O%OOMJ%OJMP.••LIAMOOCPOfVh.acu v� f-bn0f,OOP.•LJN 9. Or f-NJ—MLAbb L P - • -bbb b -b bbbbbN - q P .+ N .-� f: %; N N J M N E Nb b Mb U/b b b bP E b b b 7 N M Of�O P.OPM N 1� 61.4 N'D On%D,D LM%T --.O.••1,O O O P 1[1 �DOOPONN Pe)-404ALn<ft—LnP Sb b bbLA f`rZ N b n ONW-v..-LOO C!I"fOMNP.+U11 OOLAMMNLAO n.rf,M%T%DNOJ h P.••LO OOOP LA PLO �OJM�f� a. bbbV b.-o LA wi O b N1 b ey b 4,0 N Of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXxXXXXX�cXl..\• XxXxX.\'XJ.'1.\• • a Of�f�.•aMOJ--IJ NLA LA P-aOMLANMMO00LA0 Pf�MtA P.-� .••LP O.O �O.a LA .+I�gOl.a L C .+PMONMNJWMNMJMNJOON�NPNJNMr�.a N.DO Lf'1 P11OC OC 01 (OHO A q O. L OSO.+N.+f�.+.-L J LA N.•�.+�O h.•+1�J00J-+�•+POOIA LA.a L11 %D O N-• 0%TNfz.•n OIIO E U r+ .••1 -+ 1 I .-� 1 1 .a CIO 1 .•a M .•L I ."L 1 P N J M Ln .� P O I I 1 1 1 1 I I I U x O d C o�D NP�OJM N.-'f�OPNOPNOL[1M.•+.O LflPNJNn•�PM O.-+OJ O.OP�MK1111.0 1 N d .OP MI(O �L[10.+�O PtA PLf1f�OJ0� SOMLl1N.-�f�O.+MNOJ O11 O �D O.�Ll1JOJJ L d E L NM PPPLANP O�oO Mf�O�00�00MOM0.+MONO�00S�'+LflMON N MSO.�OPO ti V q fY NMOMPPf�N.OPOP.r.OMMNP Pf�.aPNMN.O Jf�Jf�.ObOJ MLA KOLA �DN ODD ..� C d} .ON Nr••LNNNP�O.�M PIO O.DP OLl1P O.+NMO�a f�tA N�Of�LA �D NLA I��D f�.a .OP L d L PJPLA11�0�0-OOOOPO.D M.r.pf�M1PN OMNMf�P N M.+ O -•.O[O .►+ N �L Nl�.abP N.•+bLAN S�aNhh PLA Nf�bNPP f�MLA .•r M1� b Mb b b O. 4f .0! %D Mb bbb ",WfAm �MN LAbbb �Jb bbbbbb a, b E a L.-b b -bbb 10 bb b O q L1L N J U LA to b b a 40 N E �+ O • v U J+O OONMLASOf�JOPSOPN.••LM OHO �D1�Lf1Lf10.y P.•�MPOONM c�OLAOJLALAJ C O hM NOD N Nf�OLA tv rLA OM P%D.O N•a IANLAOLAON.-L.oP Nf� Lno co rr- +LANO y.� E L . . U10.O00 Mf�000SY1J M.D Of�M0�0 M.OPJf�IAN OLA.�PPN LAPJPON.+ 1 AOI NNMNOLANNP N�OPJPPLA LAN Mf�NONOPhLANNOO�M ...L.�LA.rMOS qa hMOPNPO�OJNJ NN%T PPNJO CY CL N MO NIAM PIA �O.•+PLA.r OLA M.••L OLA PROM OLAM P.O IANJSMN O.-� O ^�� .1+•� �D.-If�bO N.+b.O �{A.a �f�PbOIAJP b.-LO.O hMLA.-OSO- 40 Ob b bN f11L hMb bbb Nb tll S NMN .Obbb .-LMb bbbbbbb GoN ico _►� .b b -bbb b bb S b b b b N O P C 9 y N d O a C:: •r N .r fy q q \ �+ O .+ E �+ O .� � y,� .r .r •� W O \ �+ C C qS L, L. q U .. N C C-y •rw •rq 01•^ Y v a O'O ;+ J+ ,qL L.OI34 O id7•� C%- S L L.CU q fLY d�+ d� to C m C -+ID00S.N4, C OIL— g012O.Cocc02 wgYLIAC Oo a L'OZ---uagq wE�amc o C-�r -y q O C cues �+ O U N E N 9 Of O�J+� d NW- -- OI t7� L C Ot O-+ 3 OI O �� p O v r�w0 �+2iVOILr�Ca1+ w cOdNOC J+r L:-• 4 , Ij cY C U U clw C-OC7-0O�+a-+OILLgw�ML..+CYYC C^IUsaCO�+win L��O.ILWFA wLelal•»oLwvo>ooLLggooalwwgoqar.--wgogma+L °im•am0L.►0N L<IDmmUUOWWWIL LL C9 C9S 22at Yam..+=Z�d�L�NIANZ=2= L T w q r City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretaryl�) SUBJECT: Resolution 90-78, Legal Publication Contract For the past couple of years, the City has been under contract with the Fort Worth Star -Telegram for publication of our legal notices. Having a contract has resulted with remarkable savings to the City due to our volume of legal notices. I reviewed the rates under this contract and compared them with the rate last year to find the differences: The rate for recruitment ads has increased from $2.15 per agate line per day to $2.89 per agate line per day. Recruitment and other display ads in the Classified Section has increased under this new contract at a rate of $2.89 per agate line per day, over last year contract of $2.15 per agate line per day. Those are the only increases over the rates we paid last year. As an example of our savings, the Sunday charge is 17� per agate line per day, compared to the regular rate (without contract) of $2.38 per line per day. A few of the reasons the City of Southlake has chosen to contract with the Fort Worth Star Telegram as our legal newspaper, over the Grapevine Sun or the Southlake Journal are: a) as a daily newspaper, we are able to meet the time frame requirements set out in the City Charter. b) The Star Telegram meets the circulation requirements outlined by State Statutes. c) No charge for affidavits (we get one on each notice). d) Lower rates to the City. If you have any questions, I will be happy to respond. City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.90-78 A RESOLUTION OF DESIGNATING AN A CONTRACT FOR FORT WORTH STAR EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER AND APPROVING OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS WITH THE TELEGRAM. PROVIDING AN WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12.05 of the City's Charter, the City Council is authorized to designate a newspaper of general circulation in the City as the official newspaper of the City, and shall cause to be published therein all ordinances, notices and other matters which are required to be published by the Charter, the ordinances of the City or the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas; and, WHEREAS, the City is currently in the practice of using the Fort Worth Star -Telegram for its official publications; and, WHEREAS, in order to avail itself of special rates offered by the Fort Worth Star -Telegram, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially declare the Fort Worth Star -Telegram to be the "official newspaper" of the City and to renew the a contract with the Newspaper for such services. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the City Council hereby designates the Fort Worth Star -Telegram as its "official newspaper" and hereby directs that all ordinances, notices and other matters which are required to be published by the Charter, the ordinances of the City or the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, shall be published in the Fort Worth Star -Telegram. Section 3. That the City Council hereby approves a Contract for Official Publications in the form attached hereby as Exhibit "A", with such publisher. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Contract to the Fort Worth Star -Telegram on behalf of the City. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. S_ City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 90-78 Page two PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor ;-7 1 THE NEWS YOU WANT WHEN YOU WANT IT Fort Worth Star-Tele ram � g Jerry Scott Classified Advertising Manager November 13, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council: MORNING EVENING SUNDAY OFFICE OF C= SECRETAR On behalf of the Fort Worth Star -Telegram, I submit herein our bid of two optional plans to publish legal notices for the City of Southlake. 1. Such legal notices will be published in any one of our four zoned Neighborhood Extra editions on Thursday at $.15 per agate line per day. The Sunday charge will be $.17 per agate line per day. Compare to the regular rate of $2.38 per line per day. We will publish recruitment ads in the classified section of the Star -Telegram at a rate of $2.89 per agate line per day. This special rate applies only if the Star -Telegram is chosen to publish legals for the City of Southlake. 2. Such legal notices will be published in both the morning and evening editions of the full circulation Star -Telegram at the rate of $.38 per agate line per day. Compare to the regular rate of $3.33 per line per day. Legals to be published on Saturday or Sunday will be $.60 per agate line per day. We will publish recruitment and other display ads in the classified section of the Star -Telegram at a rate of $2.89 per agate line per day. This special rate applies only if the Star -Telegram is chosen to publish legals for the City of Southlake. Ads are to be set in agate type unless requested otherwise. We are pleased to offer you the large circulation of the Fort Worth Star -Telegram at this low bid. Your approval of our bid would be appreciated, and we look forward to serving you in the coming year. Sincerely, erry Scott Classified Advertising Manager 400 WEST SEVENTH STREET / FORT WORTH, TEXAS s- 3 76101 / AREA CODE 817 / 390-7519 City of Southlake, Texas CONTRACT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTIES OF TARRANT AND DENTON This Contract, dated as of November 20, 1990, is made and entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, (the "City") and the Fort Worth Star -Telegram (the "Publisher"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12.05 of the City's Charter, the City Council, by its resolution approved on November 20, 1990, has designated the Fort Worth Star -Telegram (the "Newspaper") to be the official newspaper of the City, such newspaper being of general circulation in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the Publisher do hereby agree as follows: I. That the City will cause to be published in the Newspaper any ordinances, notices and other matters which are required to be published by the City's Charter, the ordinances of the City, or the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas. II. That the City and the Publisher hereby agree that the rates to be paid by the City for the City's official publications in the Newspaper will be as set forth in the Publisher's letter dated the 13th day of November, 1990, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes; and, further, that affidavits of such publications shall be furnished to the City upon its request within a reasonable period of time at no additional charge to the City. This Contract may be modified or amended at any time upon the written approval by both the City and the Publisher. Any such amendment or modification shall be attached to and incorporated into this Contract. z City of Southlake, Texas Contract for Official Publications Page Two IV. This Contract shall be in full force and effect until the 20th day of November, 1991, or its earlier termination or cancellation by either the City or the Publisher upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. written notice shall be deemed given upon a party hereto three (3) days following the deposit of such notice in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to such party as follows: To the City: City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 To the Publisher: Director of Advertising Fort Worth Star -Telegram 400 West Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 V. That the persons affixing their signatures hereto on behalf of the City and the Publisher are duly authorized and empowered to execute this Contract. ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FORT WORTH STAR -TELEGRAM Jerry Scott, Advertising Manager -_S City of Southlake, Texas 4 E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution 90-79, Calling Special Election ------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution 90-79, Calling a Special Election to be held on January 19, 1991, is in the packet. This is the first action necessary in regards to the election. If any issue in the resolution, such as change in issues, or change in election judge, etc., should change, this resolution can be amended. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. h", 4,t- S L/sl 40 -19 City of Southlake, Texas -- RESOLUTION NO.90-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 19, 1991. ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCTS WITHIN THE CITY; APPOINTING AN ELECTION JUDGE AND AN ALTERNATE JUDGE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR PRE -CLEARANCE APPROVAL; ESTABLISHING OTHER PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION; ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR CANVASSING RETURNS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 41.001 of the Texas Election Code (the "Code") specifies that the 3rd Saturday in January, shall be a "uniform election date" and that a Special Election of a City may be held on such day; and, WHEREAS, by a Resolution the third Saturday in January (January 19, 1991) has been adopted as the date of its Special election; and, WHEREAS, by this resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to officially establish the election precincts within the City, to designate a polling place for the election, to appoint the necessary election officers and to establish and set forth procedures for conducting the election; and, WHEREAS, the changes from prior practices may require pre -clearances under the Federal Voting Rights Act; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Election Day A Special election shall be held in the City of Southlake, on Saturday, January 19, 1991, at which the following issues will be voted upon: 1. Court of Record 2. Charter Revisions 3. Bond Proposals Section 2. Election Precincts In accordance with Section 42.061 of the Code, the City Council of the City hereby establishes its election precincts for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution, such precincts to be coterminous with the boundaries of the below listed election precincts established by the Denton County and Tarrant County Commissioner's Courts, to the extent such election precincts are within the corporate boundaries of the City, and to be identified by the same number as the County Precincts. The election precincts hereby adopted as the election G -/ City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 90-79, Calling Special Election page two precincts of the City are as follows: Denton County Election Precinct No. 312 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3035 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3039 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3040 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3114 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3286 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3359 Section 3. Polling Place The polling place for all election precincts of the City for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution shall be City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. The polls shall be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., in accordance with and pursuant to the requirements of the Code. Section 4. Appointment of Election Judge and Alternate Judge. The following named individuals, residing at the respective addresses, are hereby appointed to serve as Presiding Election Judge and Alternate Presiding Election Judge, respectively, at the election: Presiding Judge: Aloha Payne 1213 Whispering Lane, Southlake, Texas Alternate Judge: Sue Eubanks 2711 Rolling Lane, Southlake, Texas The Election Judge and Alternate Judge shall be qualified voters of the city. The City Secretary shall, in accordance with Section 32.009 of the Code, deliver to the Presiding Judge and the Alternate Presiding Judge notice of their appointments not later than twenty (20) days from the effective date of this Resolution. Section 5. Appointment of Clerks: The Presiding Judge for the polling place shall appoint Election Clerks and as many additional Clerks as are necessary for the proper conduct of the election. Provided, however, five (5) Clerks, shall be the maximum number of Clerks which may be appointed to serve at the polling place. All Election Clerks shall be qualified voters of the City. City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 90-79, Calling Special Election Page three Section 6. Compensation of the Election Judge and Election Clerks. The Presiding Election Judge, Alternate Presiding Judge and each Election Clerk shall be compensated at the rate of $5.00 per hour in accordance with Section 32.091 of the Code. The Presiding Election Judge shall also be paid the additional sum of $25.00 for delivering the returns of the election. Section 7. Method of Voting The City Secretary is hereby authorized and instructed to provide and furnish all necessary election supplies to conduct the election. In accordance with this resolution. Voting at the election shall be by electronic voting machine and shall be conducted in accordance with the Code. Section 8. Governing Law and Qualified Voters The election shall be held in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Texas and the Code, and all resident qualified voters of the City shall be eligible to vote at the election. Section 9. Publication and Posting of Notice Notice of the election shall be published in the newspaper in accordance with the provisions of the Code, and shall be posted in the regular place for posting notice of meetings of the City Council of the City. Section 10. Absentee Voting Absentee Voting by personal appearance shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on each day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or and official State Holiday, in accordance with the provisions of the Code. Applications for absentee voting by mail shall be delivered to the City Secretary at the same address. Absentee voting, both by personal appearance and by mail, shall be by paper ballots and shall be canvassed by the Absentee Ballot Board, which is hereby created. The Presiding Election Judge and the Alternate Presiding Election Judge appointed herein shall serve as the presiding officer and the alternate presiding officer, respectively, of the Absentee Ballot Board. The other election officer serving at the election shall serve as the other members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the election. Section 11. Submissions to the United States Justice Department. That the City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to make such submissions as are necessary to the United States Justice Department to seek pre -clearance approval. 6-3 f Vlty VI JVUU IIQRG, I CA420 Resolution NO. 90-79, Calling Special Election Page four Section 12. Delivery of Returns. In accordance with the Code, immediately after the closing of the polls on the day of the election, the election officers names in this Resolution shall make and deliver the returns of the election in triplicate as follows: one copy shall be retained by the Presiding Judge, one copy shall be delivered to the Mayor of the City, and one copy of the returns, together with the ballot boxes and all election supplies, shall be delivered to the City Secretary. All election records and supplies shall be preserved by the City Secretary in accordance with the Code. Section 13. Canvassing of Returns The City Council shall convene on January 21, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. to canvass the returns of the election. Section 14. Necessary Actions The Mayor and the City Secretary of the City, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code in carrying out the conducting the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein. Section 15. Effective Date This Resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor A r City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Reserve Officers Sgt. Richard Anderson has been a Reserve Officer with Southlake for approximately 12 years and Officer Charlie Foster has served approximately 6 years. All training and certification is in line with State requirements and are intact. Ordinance No. 523, the Ordinance amending the Reserve Police Force for the City of Southlake, requires the approval of the City Council. I, therefore, recommend this be placed on the Council Agenda for appointment of these two individuals as the City's Police Reserve Officers. � - BC/mr City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.90-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF TWO POLICE RESERVE OFFICERS UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 523, SECTION VII. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 523, Creating a Reserve Police Force for the City of Southlake, Texas, on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, Section VII of Ordinance No. 523 states that an appointment to the Police Reserve Force must be approved by the City Council before the person appointed may carry a weapon or otherwise act as a peace officer; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Sgt. Richard Anderson has been a Reserve Officer with Southlake for approximately twelve (12) years and Officer Charlie Foster has served approximately six (6) years with the Southlake Police Reserve Force. Section 2. Police Chief, James W. Campbell hereby requests that City Council approve Richard Anderson and Charlie Foster to the Southlake Reserve Police Force, under the conditions outlined in Ordinance No. 523. Section 3. That this resolution is hereby in effect upon its passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary i R City of Southlake, Texas E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement Between City of Southlake and Carroll School District Attached is the interlocal agreement prepared by the City Attorney between the City and Carroll School District. The agreement basically states the City will design and construct sewerage facilities for the existing and proposed high schools if. the school district will pay all costs associated with the two projects. This agreement has been submitted to the school district for their review and approval. The District's Board will not consider this item until their meeting on November 27, 1990. By this agreement, funding of the two projects will be borne by the District and should not present a cash flow problem to the City. It is recommended that the Council approve this agreement contingent upon the school board approving the agreement. Please place this on the Council's agenda for consideration. M� 0 INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR SEWER SERVICES STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Carroll Independent School District, a political subdivision of the State of Texas (hereinafter referred to as "District") and the City of Southlake, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as "City"). WHEREAS, Article 4413(32c) of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, authorizes school Districts and cities in the State of Texas to contract with one another for the providing of various governmental functions and services, including those in the area of public health and sanitation; and WHEREAS, City is in the process of providing sanitary sewer services to residents and other users within the city limits of City; and WHEREAS, District desires and needs access to City's sanitary sewer system for purposes of serving an existing and a proposed school within the city limits of City; and WHEREAS, District has requested that City provide the necessary sewer services and has agreed to pay for such services as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, XNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: District and City, for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: slske%e19d.e9t 5—IOZ S I. City agrees to provide for the construction of a lift station, force main and gravity line from the existing high school to the N-3 Lift Station located on the east side'of Carroll Road at Dove Creek (hereinafter referred to as the 11N-3 sewer system"). City further agrees to provide for the construction of a gravity sewer line from the S-4 sewer main to the proposed high school, which will be located at 1709 and Peytonville Road (hereinafter referred to as the 11S-4 sewer system"). II. In conjunction with the construction of the N-3 sewer system and S-4 sewer system, City will provide plans and specifications, engineering, surveying and all other functions which are preliminary to the construction of the above sewer systems. District agrees to pay for all costs of 'engineering, surveying, design, easement acquisition, inspection fees, and consultant or other fees reasonably and necessary attendant to the design or installation of said sewer systems. Upon receipt of a bill from the consultant, City will bill District for engineering, surveying and inspection fees, and such fees shall be paid to City by District within a reasonable amount of time. III. District will be responsible for securing all easements necessary for the installation of the S-4 sewer system and will pay all costs for such easements, including condemnation costs, attorneys' fees or any other fees attendant to the acquisition of such easements. slake\cisd.ayt -2- F*-3 IV. In conjunction with the design of the N-3 sewer system, City will have its engineers calculate the minimum required sizing for such lift station, force main and gravity line facilities, and shall calculate the costs of installing such minimum size facilities. City may, in its discretion, provide for oversizing or additional capacity of said systems; however, any excess costs associated with such oversizing or additional capacity shall be borne by the City. V. 'p4ro4-- a1r 60 District agrees to pay for the construction of the S-4 sewer line from the -main trunk line to the District's property. District shall be entitled to any pro rata reimbursements that may be available under Ordinance No. 493, or any subsequent approach main ordinances adopted by City. District also agrees that it will be responsible to pay its pro rata share of the existing main trunk line of the S-4 sewer system in accordance with Ordinance No. 493. City will calculate this fee prior to the completion of the S-4 sewer line and District will pay its prorated fee within a reasonable length of time. VI. Prior to construction of the above facilities, City will take competitive bids for such construction in accordance with the requirements of Chapters 252 and 271 of the Texas Local Government Code. No construction shall begin until both the City Council of City and the School Board of District have approved the award of such bid. District will pay to City the total construction costs stake\d sd.a9t -3- 4y— 41 S M on each project as set forth in the approved bid as soon as each of the bids is awarded. VII. In the event that said sewer systems or any portion thereof is not constructed by mutual agreement of the parties, District shall pay all costs and expenditures already expended by City in anticipation of such construction. VIII. This agreement and any of its terms and provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. In the event that any cause of action is filed by either party arising out of the terms of this agreement, venue for said lawsuit shall be in Tarrant County, Texas. IB. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. X. The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions or orders extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. staked sd.ayt -4- F"-5- ■, EXECUTED in duplicate originals this the day of , 1990. CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: President SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on this the day of . 1990. My Commission Expires: Notary Public in and for the State of Texas Type or Print Notary's Name APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney.for Carroll Independent School District CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney slake\eisd.ayt -S- RM- • M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works SUBJECT: Engineering Contract with Cheatham & Associates for the Design of Off -site Sewerage Facilities for the New High School Attached is an engineering contract between the City of Southlake and Cheatham & Associates for the design of off -site sewerage facilities for the new high school. The engineering contract for the design of the lift station, force main and- gravity line for the old high school was incorporated in the N-3 design contract with Cheatham & Associates and therefore, no action is required for that project. By separate agreement between the school district and the City (this agreement will be considered by the City Council on November 20, 1990 and school district on November 27, 1990), the school district has tentatively agreed to fund this project. It is recommended that if the Council approves this contract, that it be awarded contingent on the school board approving the interlocal agreement between the City and the Carroll School District. The engineering and surveying fees for the contract are reasonable and it is recommended that this item be placed on City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.90-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREE- MENT WITH THE FIRM OF CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING THE SEWER LINE FOR CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to enter into an agreement with the firm of Cheatham and Associates for Engineering Services for the Sewer Line for Carroll Independent School District, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute and deliver such agreement to Cheatham and Associates, on behalf of the City. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas October 20, 1990 Curtis Iiawk, City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Subject: Contract for Professional Engineering Services in Connection with Construction of Sanitary Sewer Lines to Serve the new High School Site (at FM 1709 and Peytonville) This letter contract may serve as a written agreement between the City of Southlake and Cheatham & Associates for those specific engineering services detailed in the Scope of Services. ENGINEERING SERVICE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 1990, between the City of Southlake, Texas, a city incorporated in the State of Texas, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Client" and Cheatham & Associates, a civil engineering firm, a subsidiary firm of Southwest Planning & Design, Inc., a Texas Corporation, located in Arlington, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Engineers." in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Recitals The Client, in exercising its public works related responsibilities, desires to retain the services of a professional civil design firm on a consulting basis. The services provided by the Engineer subject to the provisions of this contract are related only to the engineering services necessitated by providing sanitary sewer service to the new high school site. Agreement It is hereby agreed that the Client does retain and employ the Engineers to act for and on behalf of it in all engineering matters as directed by the City Manager or his representative relative to the subject project, such contract of employment to be subject to the following terms, conditions and stipulations. f -:5 CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT Scope of Services The scope of services to be furnished by the Engineer under the provisions of this contract may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following specified services necessitated by the subject projects The subject project consists of a sanitary sewer line to be constructed in order to provide sewer service to the the new High School Site at the intersection of FM 1709 and Peytonville Rd. The line to the new school site will be an extension to sanitary sewer line S-4. The Engineer is to provide 'turn -key' consulting services: generally including all design surveying, preliminary and final design, bidding and contract award, contract administration and construction staking. The work to be performed is described in detail as follows: 1. surveying 1.1 Our firm will -furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 we will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation will also be furnished. (see item 3.2) 2. Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the sewer line and appurtenances. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. 2.2 our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. 2.3 We will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice -to -proceed. 01 f-4 2.4 Periodic on -site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 2.6 Our office will prepare "As -Built" plans from the contractor and inspector's "Mark -Up" plans. 3.0 Easements (OPTIONAL ITEM) 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes & bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4 (OPTIONAL ITEM) Our office will assist in the acquiring Grantor's signatures on the easement forms. This proposal does not contemplate our firm participating in any condemnation proceedings. The following is a description of the general responsibilities of the Engineer .for each phase of the subject project: Study & Report Phase: [includes preliminary & design survey] After authorizations to proceed, Engineer shall: 1. Consult with Owner to clarify and define Owner's requirements for the Project and review available data. 2. Provide analyses of Owner's needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 9—Xoo' 3. Provide a general economic analysis of Owner's requirements applicable to various alternatives. Preliminary Design Phase: After authorization to proceed with the Preliminary design Phase, the Engineer shall: 1. Prepare preliminary design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings and outline specifications. 2. Based on the information contained in the preliminary design documents, submit a revised opinion of probable Project Costs. 3. Furnish two copies of the above preliminary design documents and present and review them in person with the Owner. Final Design Phase: After authorization to proceed with the Final Design Phase, the Engineer shall: 1. On the basis of the accepted preliminary design documents and the revised opinion of probable Project Cost, prepare for incorporation in the Contract Documents final drawings to show the character and extent of the Project (hereinafter call Drawings) and Specifications. 2. Furnish to Owner such documents and design data as may- be required for, and assist in the preparation of, the required documents so that Owner may apply for approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction over design criteria of applicable to the Project, and assist in obtaining such approvals by participating in submission to and negotiations with appropriate authorities. 3. Prepare for review and approval by the Owner, his legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. n f-4 4. Furnish two copies of the above documents and present and review them in person with Owner. Bidding Phase: After receiving authorization to proceed with the Bidding Phase, the Engineer shall: 1. Assist Owner in obtaining bids for each separate prime contract for construction, materials, equipment and services. 2. Consult with and advise Owner as to the acceptability of prime contractor or subcontractors and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s) (hereinafter called Contractor(s)) for those portions of the work as to which such acceptability is required by the bidding documents. 3. Consult with and advise Owner as to the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the bidding documents. 4. Tabulate bids and recommend to the Owner the lowest and best bid as defined in the bid specifications. Construction Phase: [includes construction surveying] During the Construction Phase, the Engineer shall: 1. Consult with and advise Owner and act as his representative as provided by the General Conditions of the Construction Contract. The extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities and authority of the Engineer as assigned in said General Conditions shall not be modified, except as the Engineer may agree in writing. All of Owner's instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through Engineer who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner to the extent provided in said General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. 5 V 1 2. Make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the executed work of Contractor(s) and to determine in general if such work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents, Engineer shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of such work. Engineer shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s) or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s). Engineer's efforts will be directed toward providing a greater degree of confidence for Owner that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents, but Engineer shall not be responsible for the failure of Contractor(s) to perform such work in accordance -with the Contract Documents. During such visits and on the basis of on -site observations, Engineer shall keep Owner informed of the progress of the work, shall endeavor to guard Owner against defects and may disapprove or reject such work failing to conform to the Contract Documents. 3. Review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the aforesaid General Conditions) and samples, the results of tests and inspections and other data which each Contractor is required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents (but such review shall not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques, or procedures or construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto); determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s); and receive and review (for general content as required by the Specifications) maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of inspection which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents. 6 4. Issue all instructions of Owner to Contractor(s); issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare change orders as required; have authority, as Owner's representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work; act as initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the acceptability of the work thereunder and make decisions on all claims of Owner and Contractor(s) relating to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining to the execution and progress of the work; but Engineer shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretation or decisions rendered by him in good faith. 5. Based on Engineer's on -site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts; such recommendation of payment will constitute a representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, that, to the best of Engineer's knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his recommendation), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by recommending any payment Engineer will not thereby be deemed to have represented that continuous or exhaustive examinations have been made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of the work, or to review the means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that Engineer has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or that any title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to Owner free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. 6. Conduct an inspection to determine if the Project is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the work has been completed in accordance 7 4r with the Contract -'Documents and if each Contractor has fulfilled all of.his'obligations thereunder so that ' Engineer may recommend, in writing, final payment to each Contractor and may give written notice to Owner and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice shall be subject to the limitations expressed in the previous paragraph (5). 7. Engineer shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or subcontractor, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractor(s)' agents or employees or any other persons (except Engineer's own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 1 through 7 of this section shall be construed to release Engineer from liability for failure to properly perform duties undertaker by him in the Contract Documents. 8 Im Time of Performance schedule: Completion of Preliminary Design within 45 days of award of contract. Completion of Final Design within 90 days of award of contract. Receive bids within 30 days of completion of Final Design Phase. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 1-0 Fees Our°engineering fee for this project is based on the Consulting Engineers Council of Texas General Engineering Services Manual. For projects of this nature and size, the manual suggests using fee curves that depict recommended fees as a percentage of actual construction costs. The fees include all incidental costs associated with providing basic engineering, except as noted below. Fee Calculation (S-4 Extension) : Estimate Cost for CISD Gravity Main Engineering Fee (9.0%) 9.0% x $ 99,500 Surveying (Plans & Construction) - Total Fee Im $ 99,500 $ 8,955 $ 5,345 ------------- $ 14 000 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank) 10 The engineer shall be compensated monthly for the work completed based on a percentage of the fees in this contract. The total fees will be based upon the Engineer's estimate of construction cost until actual bids are received. However, until bids are received, the Engineer's compensations shall not exceed 85% of the fees shown in this contract. The engineering fees to be computed for final billing will be based upon actual construction costs of the subject project. Reimbursable fees will be based upon actual time spent times current rates. (see rate schedule) The fees do not include testing using outside testing laboratories or revisions to material prepared beyond that specified in the contract. If utility easements are required, the preparations of such easements and negotiation and acquisitions of such easements will be performed by the Engineer, if the Owner so desires. The fee for such additional work to be determined and agreed upon by both parties. Current Rate Schedule The following is the current rate schedule. These rates are hourly rates for each job classification firm. within our These rates will be those used to calculate bills for fees under this agreement. These rates include all wages, benefits, overhead and profit. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $90.00 REGISTERED ENGINEER 70.00 - STAFF ENGINEER 65.00 LAND PLANNER 65.00 CERTIFIED CITY PLANNER 67.50 REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 65.00 TECHNICIAN 40.00 DRAFTER 35.00 4 MAN SURVEY CREW 85.00 3 MAN SURVEY CREW 75.00 TECHNICAL TYPIST 35.00 11 Guarantee Cheatham & Associates guarantee to maintain the rates and fees presented herein for one year from the date of this proposal unchanged. The rates include all incidental costs and expenses (except where specifically noted), including all travel, out-of-pocket expenses, drafting, telephone, typing, etc. Billing & Terms Billing for basic engineering will be monthly on the basis of the percentage of completion of project. The preliminary and design phases representing about 85% of project tasks and the construction phase representing about 15% of the project. Billing for other tasks will be for time accumulated during billing period at the rate shown herein. Invoices will be forwarded by the first and payment is expected by the tenth of each month. Termination The obligation to provide services or payments under this agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice by either party to the other. In the event of any termination, the Engineers will be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination and all reimbursable expenses. Hold Harmless Cheatham and Associates agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Southlake, its agents and employees, from any claims or - causes of action asserted against said persons and/or entities which are the direct result of any acts or omissions committed by Cheatham and Associates. Said indemnification agreement includes all damages, costs, and attorney's fees which may be incurred by the City of Southlake or its agents and employees. 12 Lq If the above meets with your approval, this proposal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the appropriate space provided below and return a duly signed copy to US. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service, your time and attention. Eddie Cheatham, P.E. Principal Authorization to Proceed with Scope of Services as Outlined Above: Signature Date Title [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 13 CITY GARBAGE SERVICE, INC. 3355 Raider Drive Hurst, Texas 76053 (817) 283-3092 1-800-633-7871 NOV131990 OFFICE OF r''4 R�CRETAR Y� As a citizen of Southlake, I share in your concern about recycling. I have served the trash and refuse needs for the citizens of the Dallas/Fort Worth area for over 35 years. Lakeside Sanitation has more experience in the :paste management service than any other company in the area. Our future plans for City Garbage Service, Lakeside Sanitation and Southern Sanitation, of which I own, will be to continue to provide the professional service, we have always provided, into the future and to work with the citizens to improve where necessary. I have always provided the best trained and responsible employees to supply this service. My staff has and will always be active in the local, state and federal areas, in order to keep me abreast of the waste management needs. �w Curtis McCaffity President/Owner CM/kb City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 City Garbage Service has served the waste needs in the Mid Cities azea for over 35 years. I have been active in recycling during the time when the economics would permit. Newsprint, glass, aluminum, clear plastic, are all known as salvageable, resale items. We have four recycling centers in operation today. We are ready to support the city councils whenever they desire to start a recycling program. I Presently have a $7,000.00 per month budget for the education and promotion of recyclables. If the citizens I serve desire curbside recycling, I have plans to expand this program by $3,030.00 per month. In the past year, I have provided a public speaker, educational material, and have had demonstrations to schools and civic groups. Buck Hubbard is on several recycling committees and is a member of the Senate Task Force on Waste Management. He spends more than five days -each month attending meetings, public hearings and recycling groups. Our program for educating the citizens for curbside recycling includes; speaking to schools, meeting with groups and visiting with the citizens in their homes. We use the educational material developed by the E.P.A., State Health Department and the news media. With the city approval, we would run a weekly contest in the local paper to gain support for the recycling Program. We are ready and cuualified to start a center recycling program or a curbside recycling program for your city. We would suggest that the city move carefully into a curbside program, as more markets are developed so we would be in a position to put more material into the recyclable stream. Buck Hubbard is on a Senate committee, whose charged with recommending to the legislation, ways to develop markets statewide for the use of recyclable material. If there is no market for recyclable material it will have to go into a disposal site. We are available to serve any curbside recycling programs :ou choose. I have included material and information on the r•�cycling programs. I believe this will be of some help to the city council. Curtis McCaffity President/Owner CM/kb a Vq t 'A$H FOR TRASH octolter 1990 Pay to the Order of: A I i cky R cycler' $. - OO • t �.. •'� - ` _' j -_: _ _ Dollars A�'�Spohsorea by 1. I Four-..CL1!t�L�S�IL(�E __ Rtcrcune i'roerarn Lack week A locty n (,. its will Win, �.. It your booschold b rwdoml�yy chosen, and m do not recycle then the - : ••Ilt over p ) the next tcek. The c#A Ncry »:1 by `. ted week rnt0 n secycla it chosen. Remember, IT PAYS TO RRCYCLQI Caller "for Inrormallon about recycling. r] TRInSTATE 1 TRUCK EQUIPMENT CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS MANUFACTURING WEST C(`AST REGION 108 TERWOOD ROAD 110 TRANSIT AVENUE 684 N?C r,ED AVENUE WILLOW GROVE, PA 19090 NASHVILLE, TN 37210 VENIt= c CA 90291 (215) 657-1583 a FAX (215) 657-7326 (615) 244-9720 (213 922-2245 ROGERS RECYCLEIA3 MODEL 220 RRU PAYLOAD.... IS THE NAME OF THE GAME IN PROFITABLE RECYCLING OPERATIONS THE ROGERS RECYCLER CLEARLY MEETS THE NEED FOR A VEHICLE SYSTEM TO COLLECT, TRANSPORT AND DISPOSE OF SO RCE-SEGREGATED CURBSIDE RECYCLABLE WASTE COLLECTING BINS THE COLLECTING BINS TRAVERSE FROM BOTTOM TO TOP IN NINE SECONDS AND THE RETURN TRIP FROM TOP TO BOTTOM TAKES BUT SIX SECONDS. _VER, THESE SPEEDS ARE EASILY ADJUSTED THE FIELD. THIS RAPID, PATENT PROTECTED CYCLING OF THE TOP LOADING SYSTEM IS UNRIVALED IN THE INDUSTRY. COLLECTION AND LOADING: EXTERIOR ON FRAME BEHIND CAB. DUMPING: BY FOUR —STAGE 38 TON HOIST SEQUENTIALLY THROUGH AIR ACTUATED GATES FROM CONTROLS IN CAB. CAPACITY/CONFIGURATION COLLECTION BINS CAN BE MOUNTED ON EITHER OR BOTH SIDES UP TO SIX BINS PER SIDE. EACH SIDE HAS A CAPACITY OF 2.5 CUBIC YARDS. THE FULL —LOAD CAPACITY IS 32 CUBIC YARDS — WHICH IS COMPLETELY ACHIEVABLE THROUGH THE TOP —LOADING SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTED BY: CONSTRUCTION THE ROGERS RECYCLING BODY IS QUALITY BUILT OF HEAVY GAUGE STEEL WI1I1 HIGH TORQUE HYDRAULIC MOTORS AND AIR OPERATED DUMI' GATES AND COVERS. AS MOMITED, IT MEETS ALL FEDERAL AND STATE OVER—T!IE ROAD REQUIRE— MENTS. TRAVELING TO PERMIT TOP LOADING OF T11 COMPARTMENTS, THE AIR ACTUATED COVER', ARE OPENED. DURING COLLECTION, THESE COVERS REMAIN OPEN. FOR OVER THE ROAD MOVEMENT, THE COVERS ARE RETURNED TO THE CLOSED POSITION. LONE STAR PETERBILT TRUCK SALES, INC. 515 N. LOOP 12 IRVING, TEXAS ; 5061 90cause of continuing advancements end technological Improvements In our products, we reserve the r,�t to charq svecifications of any I!— ..thout notice ROGERS RECYCLER MODEL 220 RRU (AS MOUNTED ON PETERBILT LOW ENTRY DUAL OPERATING MODEL 320) 7AI, sPRG. SUSP. 29,000 lbs. 22'-0" THEN 182" IS REQ'D. GVW 33,000 lbs. j F. A . DUCA FECICIFP9 ;Ie '•A Baff%k to Parker Industries introduces a 'Back to Basics" approach to recycling in America. Available in chassis and trailer mounted models for curb side collection, and roll -off models for drop off collection, Parker Recyclers make col- lecting recyclables easy, efficient, and profitable. Chassis and trailer mounted unit feature individual compartment flexibility and a unique "parallelogram" lift/ unload system for unloading into a variety of containers, compactors or other recy- cling vehicles. Roll -off units feature heavy-duty sides, ends and roof, up to five collection The. Greenliflu Products compartments wit Ii quick release latches. POYLid covers on large fill openin+is and under structures that match all major brand roll -off systrrns. All models of tpr a low 48" side loading Bright. Everyone agr-es that recycling makes good sense. Get back to the basics and let Parker help you make it profitable. For complete information, contact your local Parker dealer or call us on our GreenLine at 1-800-526-8997. gb-i l`kMN d JA ,-W Pj9jh : 4 z "` µ . , Look to LEWISystems for the experience to help make your recycling program a success. You have plenty of challenges before you —whether you're starting a pilot program or launching a community - wide operation. But one of those challenges —selecting containers —need not be a burden. Nor should it be a hit-or-miss decision. . Because LEWISystems, with over125 years of container experience, can bring successful techniques used in other communities to your project. We'll help you choose the right containers, ones that help you achieve high participa- tion and volume in a hurry. Take a close look at our containers. You'll see thev're designed to make collecting recWables hassle -free for your residents. And they make hand- ling easy for the waste hauler. Our cross -stacking system gives residents ample ac- cess space to deposit large recyclables-51/2- in our 14-gallon model to accom- modate large bottles. and 9" in our 18-gallon unit to accommodate one -gallon milk containers. Large hot stamp area helps you distinguish your community's con- tainers. We've found that printed messages can encourage proper use, increase participation and reduce theft. r Raised drain nvni;,• I, .tl .igr• of liquid fmn, •, hl, . r t rin•� allowaeratt( itO' ! r,itm, it dr,un out while sttr ,"W'Iri,• ti"Ihd bottoms area,,,. ,ul,ihl,• --�--+... - T••--• - ..w•.....� . frgonr,micalh 6-signed, pocket -type h,tndlvq a.,v Imp, •notrgh for glnvrd hands I he% w designed for easv handling, hoth 1w residents and by r-ollr•ction per —noel And they're mintorcr•d for r•tln strength. No— Nesting .tl •d ty makes handling of empties .I mllly. Plus it minimises tramporl.a—ti tul%toraage space Pi4e the Wave of the Future: R"cycle Todayl 'promotes recycling through a colorful poster designed to appeal to all grade levels. A joint effort between EPA and the National Science Teachers Association, the poster appeared in the The Science Teacher and can be displayed in (i conjunction with recycling activities or used to help foster recycling. Adventures of the Garbage Cr-mlin: Recycle and Combat a I ire of Grimie introduces students in grades 4-7 to the benefits of recycling' through an engaging comic book approach. Students are led on a lively adventure where they encounter the problems associated with garbage and watch their peers foil a scheme of the "Garbage Gremlin" to make their school his new home. The comic book describes the recycling process in a thorough yet entertaining way that speaks to students directly and encourages them to assess their present attitudes and behaviors. Help Walt"" recycle the newspapers A newspaper stops at many places when it is recycled. The recycling center collects all the newspaper. The paper mill turns the old newspapers into fresh, clean paper. Finally, the printing plant uses the new paper to make new `i newspapers. Help Walt get the old papers turned In- i :: i* N. © to new newspapers without getting i= i N. `� �!. 4 is lost. J , 2 n r/-, Flnd These Words: BOTTLE ENERGY PLASTIC CURB PAPER TREE LANDFILL :TRASH COLLECTION REUSE CENTER GLASS CAN ENVIRONMENT RECYCLE RECYCLEOMOAPEREE OGTROEZXGNAEYR LN 80TTLEBPLPL.SMI YV L P W I L 0 E G E H R UP U E I A L UP E R W R S CA E G 9 V R NAM I C A N B S UWC S S CO D S R B T 1 0 E N E R G Y T EN FT081CRYMASLG:8NM IIVOOTREEZXARO T i E L C X 0 N 0 W 0 P L G S T J EN LHSARTCURBOSZ.A RT Do you throw your dishes in / the trash after dinner? Do you throw your clothes \ out when they get dirty? Of course not. You clean and use them again. Recycling is almost the same thing. Instead of throwing out a bottle, can, or newspaper, we try to reuse it to make something new. It is Important. When we reuse something, there is less garbage to burn or bury and we save our resources — like our trees. Did you know that it takes 17 trees to make e one ton of paper. Americans use 50 million tons of paper each year. That is 850 million trees used to make paper each year. When we reuse old paper to make new paper, we save trees. Other \ things can be recycled, too— glass, tin cans, alumi- num cans, cardboard boxes, and even plastic bottles. Recycling is easy. Instead of throwing recyclables in the trash, put them in separate container. When your con- tainer is filled, take it to a recycling center or put it on the curb for collection. Remember, recycling is important. it is something we should all do. 0 Did you know that the average American throws away 3.6 pounds of garbage each day. All together r _ Americans throw out 160 million tons of garbage per year. That Is enough garbage to bury 27,000 football fields in a layer of garbage 10 feet deep. Americans throw away almost 700 million bottles each week. In two weeks, we throw away enough glass bottles to fill up both the twin towers of New York's World Trade Center. Each are 1,350 feet high. i U.1 TM When you see this symbol on something, it means that it w:s made from recycled materials or that it can be recycled. RI P] BASICS OF ORGANICS The basics of organics is to improve the soil. Healthy soil produces healthy plants with very powerful natural insect and disease resistance. 1. Stop catching the grass clippings. Allow the clippings to return to the soil. 2. Stop using synthetic fertilizers and synthetic pesticides. 3. Start using compost and natural fertilizers. 4. Use natural or less toxic pesticides but only when needed for specific problems. 5. Select native and well adapted plants. 6. Mulch all bare soil - a must! 7. Water thoroughly and deeply but less frequently. MAKING COMPOST Compost is a living fertilizer that can be made at home or purchased ready to use. A compost pile can be started at any time of the year. Good ingredients include leaves, grass clippings, tree trimmings, non -greasy food scraps, sawdust, rice hulls, weeds, pecan hulls and animal manure. Mix the ingredients together in a container of wood, hog wire, concrete blocks or simply pile the material on the ground. The best mixture is 80% vegetative matter and 20% animal waste. The ingredients should be a mix of coarse and fine -textured material. Avoid having all the pieces of material the same size since the variety of sizes will help air to move through the pile. Oxygen is a critical ingredient. Turn the pile at least once a month. More often is OK and speeds up the process. Keep the pile moist, roughly that of a squeezed -out sponge, to help the living microorganisms thrive and work their magic. Compost is ready to use when the ingredients are no longer identifiable. The color will be dark brown, the texture soft and crumbly and the aroma that of a forest floor. Use compost in all bed preparation and as a high quality mulch. 10 BEST TREES FOR NORTH TEXAS LARGE TREES Texas Ash Bur Oak Texas Red Oak Lacebark Elm Chinese Pistachio Bald Cypress SMALL TREES Mexican Plum Yaupon Holly Eldarica Pine Crape Myrtle Wax Myrtle Chitalpa HOWARD GARRETT ON ORGANICS RADIO WBAP (820 AM) Talk Show, Sundays 8:00-12:00 A.M. WRR (101.1 FM) Commentary, 5:30 Friday afternoons NEWSPAPER Dallas Morning News - Weekly Column The Natural Way in Friday's House and Garden Section THE ORGANIC WAREHOUSE @ LAMBERrS 7300 VALLEY VIEW LANE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 (214) 239-0121 BASIC ORGANIC PROGRAM Planting Prepare new planting beds by scraping away existing grass and weeds, adding V-6" compost and tilling to a depth of 8". Excavation and additional ingredients are unnecessary. Mowing & Trimming Mow weekly leaving the clippings on the ground, put excess in compost pile. Do not send bagged clippings to the dump. Do not use weed eaters around trees. Weeding Hand pull large weeds and work on soil health for overall control. AVOID HERBICIDES, especially pre -emergent types. Pruning Remove dead, diseased and conflicting limbs, don't overprune, don't make flush cuts and don't paint cuts. Insect control Aphids, lacebugs, spider mites: liquid soap @ 1 teaspoon/gallon of water. Release ladybugs in spring, green lacewings in summer and fall. Caterpillars & bagworms: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) per label, Bti "israelensie for mosquitos. Slugs, snails, fleas, ticks, chinch bugs, roaches, crickets: Diatomaceous earth at 1-2 tablespoons per gallon of water. White Flies: liquid soap @ 1 teaspoon per gallon and a solution of hydrogen peroxide, 8 oz. of 3% solution per gallon. Spray entire infested area. Fire Ants: "Logic Fire Ant Control" for large areas, vinegar/diatomaceous earth solution on individual mounds. Grubworms: Rotenone/pyrethrum/soap. Spot treat only by drenching infested area. Disease control Black Spot, brown patch, powdery mildew: best control is prevention through soil improvement and avoidance of high nitrogen fertilizers. Baking soda @ 4 teaspoons/gallon water. Overseeding NOT RECOMMENDED, causes conflict with permanent grasses. Fertilizing Fertilaid @ 20 lb./1000 s1 spring, summer and fall. Spray foliage, trunks, limbs and soil with the following mixture monthly during the growing season: Agrispon @ 1 oz/gallon, MaxiCrop seaweed @ 1 oz/gal, Alaska fish emulsion @ 1 oz/gal and liquid soap @ 1 teaspoon per gallon/1000 s.f. Add bat guano @ 10 lb/1000 s.f. and earthworm castings @ 10 lbs/1000 s1 to annuals and perennials once per month. For bulbs add a handful of earthworm castings to each hole. Mist or soak bulbs with 1% Agrispon. Mulching Mulch all newly planted material with 1" of compost and 3" of aged wood chips, deco bark or shredded hardwood bark. Mulch vegetable gardens with 8" of wheat straw or alfalfa hay. Watering Adjust schedule seasonally to allow for deep, infrequent waterings in order to maintain an even moisture level. For detailed information on products and techniques refer to Howard Garrett's two books; Plants of the Metroplex III, The Organic Landscape Manual and his weekly column The Natural Way in the "Dallas Morning News". EM s/7/90 DO IT RIGHT! USE KOTRAC'S IGLOO RECYCLING SYSTEMS. THE KOTRAC TOTAL COLLECTION SYSTEM. THE ONLY WAY OF EFFICIENT RECYCLING! • Reduces solid waste disposal. • Increases use of recyclables. • Prevents serious pollution by collection of batteries, oil and plastics. • Preserves raw materials and saves energy. • Operates cost efficient. • Accommodates federal and local environmental programs. SELECT AND COMPOSE YOUR OWN IGLOO RECYCLING BANKS WITH ECONOMICAL KOTRAC IGLOO'S. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF KOTRAC IGLOO'S. - Sizes: 3.3 cubic yard - 0 5.8' - H 5.5' 4.3 cubic yard - 0 6' -H 6' - Materials: glassfiber reinforced polyester - Surface: smooth, glossy topcoating - Color: various standard colors - Noise: no noise pollution, noise isolated(<60 dbs (dba)) - Emptying: one man/truck operation �-� liotr�c Kotrac Recycling Inc. Kotrac b.v. recycling Kotrac International n.v. One Rockefeller Plaza Zuringstraat 1 Leopoldstraat 11/bus 2 New York, NY 10020 3053 JT Rotterdam B/2800 Mechelen U.S.A. Nederland Belgie tel: (212) 265-64 26 tel.: 010-422 03 11 el.: 01-5-41 14 55 Kotrac Ltd. 5 Arlington Street St. James's London SW1A 1RA Engeland tel.: 01-491 74 50 �Tl KCTRAC RECYCLING U.S. HEADQUARTERS 37 SKYLINE DRIVE, SUITE 4304 LAKE MARY, FL 32746 TELEPHONE 407-333-0607 DO IT RIGHT! USE KOTRAC'S IGLOO RECYCLING SYSTEMS. THE KOTRAC TOTAL COLLECTION SYSTEM. THE ONLY WAY OF EFFICIENT RECYCLING! • Reduces solid waste disposal. • Increases use of recyclables. • Prevents serious pollution by collection of batteries, oil and plastics. • Preserves raw materials and saves energy. • Operates cost efficient. • Accommodates federal and local environmental programs. SELECT AND COMPOSE YOUR OWN IGLOO RECYCLING BANKS WITH ECONOMICAL KOTRAC IGLOO'S. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF KOTRAC IGLOO'S. — Sizes: -3.3 cubic yard - 0 5.8' - H 5.5' 4.3 cubic yard - 0 6' - H 6' — Materials: glassfiber reinforced polyester — Surface: smooth, glossy topcoating — Color: various standard colors — Noise: no noise pollution, noise isolated(<60 dbs (dba)) — Emptying: one man/truck operation =4 1-{otrm.ic Kotrac Recycling Inc. Kotrac b.v. recycling Kotrac International n.v. Kotrac Ltd. One Rockefeller Plaza Zuringstraat 1 Leopoldstraat 11/bus 2 5 Arlington Street St. James's New York, NY 10020 3053 JT Rotterdam B/28C0 Mechelen London SW1A 1RA U.S.A. Nederland Belgie Engeland tel (212) 265-64 26 Tel 010-422 03 :el : 0---11 14 55 tel.: 01-491 74 50 KGTRAC RECYCLING U.S. HEADQUARTERS 37 SKYLINE DRIVE, SUITE 4304 LAKE MARY, FL 32746 TELEPHONE 407-333-0607 Times Herald k before leaping into recyclifig.. cities tole ,a, � rFss ies need to know there's a limited market fo �; * d � Hills will begin Jan. 1; Richland H1. recycled materials. andIurst are expected to follow. CAIJGA — It's taken residents here "We know a lot of people want to go 16* .!40 The five cities have ,about 39,000 hou_ . ee weeks to send about 95,000 pounds curbside recycling by Jan. 1," said Tim Snow- . , holds that could participate in a curbside p: Yspapers, aluminum cans, glass and den, president of Western Reclamation it; $i'am. They could generate more than 1 to a nearby recycling ct:nter. Richland Hills, a sorting and: reprocessing"tons;of recyclables each week. officials and represeniLtives of Laid- center. *Why should we wait for Garland, Dal', aste Systems, Watauga' garbage ser- "But it is without any focus onewhether ;' and ;Fort Worth to implement a progrw re complimenting one ac,uther for their there is a market for items they -want to recy- ' ' The bottom line is we saw the need for it a. r efforts as one of Ta, rant County's cle." tets implemented it," Keating said. says recycling .unicipalities to adopt citywide collec- Snowden c are vole Environmentalists say such myopic vie,_ }mark . one question few in this city 27 miles tile because supply is exceeding demand. • • ..'af recycling have created the national g- f Dallas can answer is: "Where does There are four major recycling centers in „�- , bage crisis. Ssh end up?" Tarrant County where goods can be sorted 'i : "You've got to have markets available als Laidlaw's problem," Watauga City and baled for resale. The centgrs managers ; absorb the materials generated through the er Bill Keating said. "Once you pick it are telling cities to ease into curbside pro- `' cycling programs," said Gail Vittori, c grams responsibility to get it where it's s because of the glutted market. .' . director of the Center for Maximum Pote �o be recycled." Cities, however, aren't heeding the Warn-"tial Building Systems, which helped Aus- as more cities implement curbside pro- ings- develop a curbside program. - recycling center managers have start- In December, Benbrook will'Join Watauga, - "But centers -also need to expand tl: Ving it as their problem. They say cit- in offering curbside recycling. North Rich- market opportunities." a. S P E C IAL R E P O R T: Recycling in the States Update 1989 The rush to recycle continued in 1989 as 38 states and the District t►I' Colum- bia enacted more than 120 rc ycling laws through September, yet only two mandates for materials collection were passed. State laws also attael ed plastics and such problem wastes a,, tires, used oil, and batteries with conihPiations of' incentives, bans, and trade-H, require- ments. 0 National Solid Wastes Management Association 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW Suite 1000 1 Washington. DC 20036 (202)659-4613 Nf. A Comprehensive Recycling Laws Mandatory Mandated Mandated Source Drop-off Center Year Plan Goal Goal Separation or Collection Arkansas 1989 • California 1989 • 50% by 2000 • Connecticut 1987 • 25% by 1991 • District of Columbia 1989 • 45% by 1994 • Florida 1988 _ • 30% by 1994 • Hawaii 1988 • • Illinois 1988 • 25%1 Iowa 1989 • 50% by 2000 Louisiana 1989 • 25% by 1992 Maine 1989 • 50% by 1994 • z Maryland 1988 • 20% by 1994' • Massachusetts 1987 • 20% by 1992 Michigan 1988 • 50% by 2005 Minnesota 1989 • 25% by 1993 • New Jersey 1987 • 25% by 1992 • New York 1988 • 50% by 1997 • North Carolina 1989 • 25% by 1993 Ohio 1988 • 25% by 1994 • • Oregon 1983 • Pennsylvania 1988 • 25% by 1997 • Rhode Island 1986 • maximum possible° • Tennessee 1989 • Vermont 1987 • 40% by 2000 Virginia '1989 • Washington 1989 • 50% by 1995 • West Virginia 1989 • 30% by 2000 Wisconsin 1983 • Notes. This chat depicts requirements of both new and revised comprehensive recyr* laws,the date of the most recent law is given. RerycliR i . Mans may be a component of state or rrwnicipal solid waste ma►agementplons, or separate requirements. Only final ►ecyrb'ng gook ore Wed,' states often ,ldude source reduction and cariposlmg in this percentage. ' This goal only applies to counties with populations greater than 100,000. ! Source separation requirements only apP�Y to offices. s Twenty percent recycling is the opt goof. Counties with populations greater than 150,000 must recycle of least 15 percent of their waste. Counties with populations under 150,000 must recycle at least five percent of their waste. 4 Municipalities must achieve at least 15 percent recycling. Market Grants Tax Education Studies or Loans Incentives • • • • • • • • • 1 • - '' • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • - • • .( =.��• 1 • • • ,, • ;. A s i 1 Each year. Americans produce about 160 million tons of residential and commercial waste, but only around 11 percent — 17 million tons — is eventuall\ reclaimed. As landfills rapidly reach capacity and clo�% state and local governments are urgently seeking wa\ ,; to reduce the amount of trash destined for disposal. Recycling, once strictly a volunteer activity. is now la\% in many parts of the country. Also, landfilling is no longer so inexpensive that recycling is not worth the effort. Twenty-six states plus the District of( olumbia now have comprehensive recycling laws. I hose statutes provide a framework for statewide recyclin_ and. in some cases, mandate local government and citizen participation in collection efforts. In addition, six of the nation's ten largest cities (Chicago, Los AnLeles, New York, Phoenix. Philadelphia, and San Diego) have begun collecting recyclables at curbside in the past two years. Three of the others (Houston, San Antonio and Dallas) have programs in preliminary stages. More than 1,000 curbside recycling programs are operating in municipalities around the country. What is recycling? Recvclin_ involves three basic steps: ❑ Separating recyclable products from iher trash. Two common methods are curbside collecti-li of materi- als that have already been sorted into multil,ie containers and transport of mired recyclables to a mui, rials recovery facilin• (MRF) for sorting. 0 Processing recyclables so that they can be substi- tuted for virgin raw materials at manufacturing plants. For example, at plastics recycling facilities. old bottles are cleaned, sorted, and shredded into small chips. Then, the chips are melted and molded into small l,,•Ilets for sale to manufacturers. ❑ Returning recycled material to commerce. usually as part of other products. Common examples include old newsprint, which can be procesScd to make new newsprint or tissue, and cardboard, Wilk11 can be reused in packaging. 1989 Recycling laws by Primary Topic Other Problem ;, at- 197- Recycling Vehicle Recycling of Commercial Exemptions Facilities 2%� 4% State Recycling Efforts Expand in 1989 The 125 recycling laws enacted in I '':9 encompa-,-, a broad ran;_e of tactics and program. hit materials recovery.= Comprehensive laws were en,t, led in eleven states — Arkansas, Califomia, Iowa. L(n'i.iana, Maine. Minnesota. North Carolina, Tennessee. `, ir;inia, Wash- ington, and West Virginia — plus the 1), lrict of Coluni- bia. States also stepped up efforts to rCL tt• er plaaics and problem wastes such as tires, used oil. tnd car batter- ies for recycling. Many of the 1980 I:iws created or reauthorized grant and loan funds 'rr help munici- palities purchase equipment and build facilities. Others addressed such diver-,c tttpics as ex- emptions from size limit-, h)r recycling trucks, feasibility studies hit recycling ash, and recycling in government agencies. Some laws just made minter amendments to earlier acts. r--Procurement r. .y.x Plastics 8 Packaging 180e Tot,il: 125 laws in 38 states and the District of Columbia' ' Sesles that passes r(:;ding laws through September 1989: Arkansas, Arizona, (o6ranio, (olaado, (onnecticut. Dela%- rtorida, Hawaii Iowa, IDinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Mossmhusetls, Maryland, Mein Michigan u--o,oto, Missouri. Montano, North Carolina, North Dakota, Now Nantpdtke, New Jersey, Nevada. Ne» +irk. Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode hood, South Dakota, Tonnes", Texo% Utah, Virginia, Wasg'on, Wisconsin, West Ynginia. and Wyoming. r his survey idenuf•es --,cycling bills signed into low as or September 20, 1919. Aho kdoded as rscxGng awes siprd by the governor of (arifornio through tktoba 1, and Minnesoto NF 417,16 'Stare Rill' shined ,mo !ow on October 3. Leglsk"w" In Mea "111s, Atkhiges, ber lacy, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin were stiff in session of deft of FAKotion. Preferences 7% Comprehenskc tec}slim_ law-, passed between and 1988 were mainly enacted b\ • ,toe-, w ith ;eycre landfill capacity sh,,;mues. Promi- nent features of snit lags were requirements for t rarating Grants recyclables at the urce. al-,o Financing known as mandate[[+ curbside col- 1100 lection. But 1989 \ :gilded only two 1 Comprehensive Programs 14% separation mandatt .. in Wa-,hin�a- ton and the Dimri� t A' Columbia. (Maine's separatiertt requirements apple only to offic, t Reluctance to establish the more .c ineent rules in 1989 may be a reacti-n to the glutted market conditions that resulted when hundreds of thousands tf citizens began to source separate in the Northeast. Also, the majority of states that •nacted compre- hensive programs this year have the luxury of more than ten years of landfill space. Here are some examples of 1049 laws: California. On October I, 1989. the governor concluded the legislative session by signing the last of 18 new recycling laws. The state now hit-, a mandatory goal of 25 percent source reduction. cotttllosting. and re- cycling by January 1, 1995, which junil. to 50 percent by the year 2000, where feasible. Citie, must prepare nine -part source reduction and recyclint. plans by July 1, 1991 for county approval. Failure to sul'mit adequate plans can result in fines of up to $10.00 t per day. County plans for siting disposal facililie. to handle the remaining waste must be sent to the nev. state Integrated Waste Man- ment Board. A variety of measures were adopted to , ..atc new markets for recyclables. To meet a goal of pw,hasint. 40 percent recycled products by 1995. the ,i,,e will Live preference to recycled oil, glass, compost, pi .,tics, solvents, and paint. The state is also required to lcgin using retreaded tires, and to purchase only recycl..1 lead acid batteries. In addition, 40 percent of lu_h gr:. paper purchased by the: state must be recycled p.i,•.r. Local governments will �%ork to create a recycling ii.Irastructttre with "market development zones." In., nines for private investment include indi%idual . ;id corporate tax credits and industrial derelopnt.,.i hands. Washington. liB 1671. signed by the governor in May, retimi, s all cities and counties to add waste reduction ::;.,I recycling strategies to their waste manage- ment plan, Vier plan approval, the municipalities have one year it, I.egin source separation and collection prozrauts. tag on homeowners, based on the number of rel•UNe c, utaincrs set out for collection each week, provides hi_ds for municipal composting and recycling facilities. \l.,rkct de\clopntcnt is assignLd to the DCp.u-uncn -l' 'I'radc and Economic De,'clopment and a task torcc ,tatc and industry officials. Other provi- sion, iucii—, a him on disposing car batteries, a fee on replaeente,. ores. a public information hotline, and an wxald pn) .;ill. hma 1 11. 75; creates a framem-ork for statewide rec�.luig .. ute future, Mile tar`_'eting reduction and rec�� lmg i•n)hlcm %%astc. The law establishes ambi- tion, ult)al A "i percent %paste reduction by 1994 and 50 percent the \ear 2000. Communities must develop and impl.:.. tit rccycling plans. To aid market develop- ment. the ae \%ill set up a recycling network linking waste gen. ,.tors and private recycling companies. The la%% bans., :rics of materials from landfills including yard eastc lead acid batteries, scrap tires, and used oil. It also prol,,I,its the sale of plastics containing chlo- rofluoroccio ions. In addition, if 50 percent of all polysty- rene pack.i _Ong, used in the state is not recycled by lanuary 1. 1 �)94, it cannot be manufactured or sold. Distri< I of Columbia. Noting that 53 percent of the waste sue,..�t in the nation's capital is paper, the District passed its—ind:tory source separation act in January. Residents .,re scheduled to begin separating all news- paper and ,Ord waste for collection by October 1, 1989. Government agencies and businesses must recycle office paper and . wwsprint. Separation of glass and metals for both coniwcrcial business and residents should start in 1990. (Dui to a short start-up time and lack of funds to implement the program, requirements are being phased in more A, I .%ly than planned.) A multi -material buy- back centc . will be constructed to handle some of the materials; an intermediate processing facility is author- ized. The law also requires the District's paper pur- chases to include "not less than 45 percent (recycled paper products) by October 1, 1992." A plan will be developed to recycle certain hard -to -dispose items and to create tax incentives and loans for businesses. North Carolina. SB I I 1 takes a cautious approach towards mandatory recycling. Counties are required to "attempt to achieve" a 25 percent reduction in their waste stream by January I, 1993. First, recycling provisions must be added to waste management plans, then communities have until July 1, 1991 to ensure "separation before final disposal" of waste. Those who do not comply with the law are ineligible for solid waste grants. State responsibilities include providing technical, planning, and financial assistance for local governments, maintaining a market directory for recyclables, conduct- ing education programs, creating a full -cost accounting system for solid waste disposal, and conducting periodic market evaluations. Lead acid batteries. used oil, white goods and yard trash are banned from landfills. Detailed standards for used oil and scrap tire recycling address facility licenses, transporter registration, and fees. The law also bans the sale of plastic bags unless they are recyclable. Finally, the law establishes a purchase preference for recycled materials in construction projects. Three states — Oregon, Wyoming and New Hampshire — passed less sweeping laws that require waste reduction measures at landfills and incinerators. Municipalities may send waste to commercial landfills in Oregon only if they have rules in effect at least as stringent as Oregon recycling laws. (This measure is partly in response to proposed shipments of Seattle, Portland, and other big city refuse to landfills in less populated Oregon communities.) Wyoming assesses commercial waste facilities $10 for each ton of waste they accept, but reimburses $5 for each ton they reclaim for recycling. In New Hampshire, recyclables must be removed or the garbage otherwise reduced in weight by 15 percent before landfilling (incineration in waste -to - energy plants is acceptable). California -Recycling equip - merit investment tax credit for �� individuals and corporations. Development bonds for manufacturing products with recycled materials. Colorado4ax credits for investments in plastics recycling equipment. Incentives for Recycling .r North Car olinaAndustrial and corporate tax credits and exemptions for equipment and facilities. Oregon- Iiulividual and corporate income tax credits Florida -Sales tax exemption — for equipiagnt purchases and }� on recycling machinery pur- facilities. chased after July 1,1988. Texas-fvmchise tax Inarana—Property tax exemp- exemption for sludge recycling Lions for buildings, equipment, �, corporatier•:. and land involved in recycling operations. Washington -Exemption of `. tires and certain other hard -to - Maine -Tax credit equal to 30% dispose materials from of cost of equipment and portions of soles and use .machinery. Subsidies to taxes. municipalities for scrap metal transportation costs. Wisconsin -Sales tax exemption for equipment New Jersey-50% investment and facilities; business credit for recycling equipment property tax exemptions for and programs. some equipment. 1989 Problem Waste Recycling Laws Lead Used Acid 09 Batteries Tires • • • States Target Materials In 1989, many states focused their legislative efforts on recycling specific materials such as plastic . packaging, yard waste. and hard -to -dispose items. Recycling Problem Waste State lawmakers this year favored recycling as rhr best method of managing such problem wastes as tir used oil and car batteries. These laws create infrastrm_ - tures for recycling, which include disposal rest rictioai,. storage facility permits. public notices, and trade-in requirements. New Hampshire and Maine place a surcharge on new car batteries, and then give consumers a rebate if they bring in their used battery for trade-itr. Oklahoma places a $1.00 fee on each new tire sold and then retums 50 cents to permitted processing facilirir. for each tire handled. North Carolina funds a separ:ur public education campaign just for used oil collectit m and recycling. Connecticut is the first state to mandme recycling of nickel cadmium batteries, one source (11 heavy metals in municipal waste. Consumer product containing these batteries must be labeled. and the battery must be easy to remove. Recycling efforts h in after July. 1993. Why are these problem wastes? Over 400 million gallons of used oil (40 times the amount of tlrp Exxon Valdez oil spill) end up in the trash or sewers each year. About 50 million gallons of used oil are reprocessed each year into fuel, lubricant, and hydraulic oils. ❑About27 percentof the 240 million vehicle firesdiscarded eachyeat are reclaimed, most of them recapped. One promising use for the other 13 percent is rubberized asphalt. (urrently, surplus tires are thrown in stockpiles, adding 150 million to 200 minion tires a year to the estimated two billion to three billion tires already there. Such stockpiles can be breeding grounds for disease-coong mosquitoes. Another hazard is fire pile fires, which send noxious gases into the air and can take months to extinguish. ❑ Even though about 80 percent of the lead add batteries sold in the U.S. are recycled each year, a recent EPA report found that die discarded ones are still a major source of lead in municipal waste. New laws aim to capture the remaining 20 percent for recycling. Plastics and Packaging Plastics and packaging have receiycd intense scrutiny as s\ mbols of a disposable societ . EPA estimates that packaging and containers a. , ount for about 30 percent of our waste, and plastic represent At least 18 states now require codes on plastic contain- ers to identify the type of resin they are made from so fiat industry can readily sort them for recycling pur- poses. Twelve states (Colorado, Iowa, Indiana, Louisf ono, Ohio, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, and Texas) passed such laws in 1989. The deadlines for coding range from January 1990 to July 1992. Illinois, Connecticut, and New Hampshire passed laws in 1989 to put logos on recyclable products and those made from recycled materials to encourage consumers to buy them. At least ten states (Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, Nevada, Rhode Is- land, and North Dakota) enacted product bans in 1989. Common torgetswere plastic beverage contain- ers unless recyclable, beverage containers with detach- able rings or tabs, and polystyrene packaging made with chlorofluorocarbons. Similar bans have been enacted in Berkeley, CA; Newark, NJ; Suffolk County, NY; Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN; and Portland, OR. seven percent (by weight 1 Recent research has shown that 1,1 rstics packag- ing accounts for about nin, licrcent of the volume in landfills. t VI plastics account for 13 percent of r'rc volume.) Relatively little plastics :►n I packaging is recycled, partly because )he multiple materials and resins in Ili- i,roducts are difficult to separate. Ho\+ er, research is underway to sunnount i is obstacle. Chemical companies and +' ; %%amc industry have recently fot! wd joint ventures to collect and rc, . le soda. milk, and detergent bottle • :is well as polystyrene containers and utensils into such products as fiberfill. napping tape. flower pots, and lu►nber- ,h,titutes. (Plastic containers can ah its traces of their contents, so they aw t approved for reuse as food hackagin •. ) Meanwhile, some sta+ •s are threat- ening to ban some types (A plastic and packaging if they are not ►!-cycled. Others are passing laws to ):rcilitate recycling of these product by requiring codes on plastic bottles thru name resin types, and by restricting th- sale of multi -material containers. ► "olorado is attempting to lure the fledgling plastics ret cling industry into the state with tax credits, as xN ell as erants and loans for research and development a►►, I new equipment. Yard Waste In the quest to save landfill capacity, yard waste is an attractive target. Accord- ing to EPA, this material accounts for 18 percent (by weight) of total discards. In some states with year -long growing seasons, the percentage can be much higher. Ten states plus Washington, D.C., have now banned yard waste from landfills (the District of Columbia, Iowa, Ohio, and North Carolina enacted such bans this year). While most laws provide for separate collection, residents of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota may have b to bring the material to city facilities themselves or keep the materials at ' home. Yard debris can be composted to make mulch and soil stabilizers. ' Louisiana, Florida, Maine, and Ohio are among the states in the process of drafting regulations for compost produc- tion and use. Conclusion >' >ee R :JS � ¢ y %oak t•<r Jjn K J t ry 4.' ..- ,ry Si 0, • , District of fclturi� 10-89 Florida Illinois. ` Iowa . 1 a:fi . •' 1-90' 9-88 Wi 1-93 .12 -93 1.90 1-93 h ieiata lotwuyiN h1 tie e ed 1k tIk`uw`etm* metro area in lonuary, 199i and in all other (ountf sii[ anrmry, 199i: - (i.• ri•' '. . In 1989, state laws began to reflect an under- standing that recycling is more than separate collection of materials. New legislation tried to put the process into a larger framework of planning and goal setting. Progress was made toward recycling such problem wastes as used tires, oil, and car batteries, and toward recycling materials that are not now being extensively recovered. These efforts are still evolving. More stringent rules, such as requirements to use recycled ma- terials, along with tax incentives for manufacturers, may be needed to ensure that markets can keep pace with plans for recycling in the states. ki F. SOLID WASTE BULLETIN October 15, 1990 MARKETS FOR WASTE PAPER MATERIALS One of the Regional Priorities for Solid Waste Management (adopted by NCTCOG, July 1989) states that the key to successful recycling is markets first! The Market Development Task Force is a study group working under the guidance of NCTCOG's Resource Conservation Council to explore markets for paper and paperboard and for yard wastes. ' These wastes are recognized to be the largest volume components in the solid waste stream. The Market Development Task Force has reviewed existing markets for waste paper materials and initial findings indicate that: o Only one paper mill in the Dallas -Fort Worth area uses a limited quantity of old newsprint for its boxboard manufacture operation. The mill states that it does not plan on future expansion and cannot accept increases in old newsprint beyond its current needs. o Not one paper mill in Texas recycles old newsprint into new newsprint at this time. However, within the next two or three years, a Champion paper mill in Sheldon, Texas is planning to install new equipment for recycling old newspaper. This will create a new outlet for old newspaper from Texas communities. o Most of the 'post -consumer old newspaper collected in this area is either sent out -of state or exported to Mexico, where mills produce recycled paper boxes. Texas' proximity to Mexico enables our state to enjoy relatively competitive prices for paper compared to the rest of the nation, which 4llli,, is currently experiencing a paper glut. o Some old newsprint is shipped to tissue and box mills in Oklahoma and Louisiana. o Old newsprint is a lower grade of paper, which is in lower demand compared to high (bade office and computer papers. o High intrastate freight rates tend to favor virgin materials over recycled materials. Current interstate freight costs are lower than intrastate freight, which limits the development of recycling end -markets within Texas. Current efforts are underway to relax intrastrate freight rates which may h^Ip promote more recycling within Texas. o Cardboard containers are another component of the solid waste stream which is in demand for recycling mills. One active end -user is Willamette -Kraft, a company which manufa'7tures 'kraft' paper sacks and cardboard boxes. According to the company's estimates, many companies (retail stores, supermarkets, warehouses, etc....) are already recycling their boxes but a lara,� portion of the cardboard wastes can still be captured. Anticipating an increased rate in futurq recycling, Willamette -Kraft is planning to expand their recycling pulp capacity from 250 tpd to 750 or 1,000 tpd in the next few years. s For more information, contact Saadia Mai or Kathleen Graham, North Central Texas Council of Governments, at (817)640-3300. information bulletin by the North Central Texas Council of Governments Department of Environmental Resources/P. O. Drawer COG/Arlington, Texas 76005-5888/(817) 640.3300 • The voluntary association of cities, counties, and special districts in the Dallas i Fort worth region. SOLID WASTE BULLETIN June 1. 1990 YARD WASTE REDUCTION/REUSE POTENTIAL Across America during the growing season, tons of yard waste are deposited in the local srinitary landfill. in some suburban neighborhoods, up to half of the solid waste pickups during this time of year is yard waste. Yard waste generation rates and composition vary by season, year and region. Grass clippings, fallen leaves, tree trimmings and brush from lawns can make up from 25 to 50 percent of the municipal solid waste stream, according to a national U. S. EPA study. Faced with dwindling landfill capacity and spurred by the fact that yard waste is rapidly consuming ever increasing portions of that space, local governments are exploring the options available to minimize or utilize this waste material. The general methods for handling yard waste are leaving grass clippings on the lawn as it is mowed, or collection of the trimmings for home composting. At least ten states are actually banning the disposal of leaves and/or all yard waste in landfills. These states include New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa and Minnesota. Other states, New York, for example, are using a combination of incentives, including financial assistance grants and permit requirements. Any permit for a new solid waste management facility in New York state has to include a comprehensive recycling analysis that addresses composting. Some U.S. communities are shifting to volume -based waste disposal rates — a "pay -as -you -dispose" concept. Most of these volume -based programs operate with at least a voluntary recycling program, allowing consumers to be proactive in controlling costs by recycling. The possibility of increased illegal dumping resulting from these volume -based rates has not seemed to occur because citizens seem to feel that they have more control over their own disposal costs. Since yard waste can be diverted and put to use so easily, communities throughout the country are developing utilization projects. The Texas Agricultural Extension Service has developed a city-wide lawn management educational program that seeks teach the homeowner an alternative to bagging grass clippings. This innovative program, called "Don't Bag It," hopes to reeducate citizens to voluntarily leave the grass clippings on the lawn. The technical part of this program provides expert advice on mowing, fertilizing and watering to produce a beautiful, green lawn. Yard waste can also be used as compost for gardens and flower beds. Composting utilizes the biological process that degrades organic matter. The material produced from this process is a rich humus which increases the nutrient level of the soil and improves the soil's physical characteristics when mixed into soil as an amendment. Dallas, Fort Worth and some other Texas cities are investigating composting alternatives, such as designated areas at particular landfill facilities for composting yard waste to use as a soil supplement in city parks or even as landfill cover soil. For more information, contact Saadia Mal or Kathleen Graham, North Central Texas Council of Governments, at (817) 640-3300 Metro. An information bulletin by the North Central Terns Council of Governments Department of Environmental Resources/P. O. Drawer COG/Arlington, Tom 76003-5888/(817) 640-3300 OV,40) The voluntary association of cities. counties, and special districts in the Dallas/Fort worth region. � :i ,\ .l' A G L A ti C E: Recycling Solid Waste Recycling and Waste Disposal Naturally, successful recycling depends upon finding a Reducing the volume of garbage that must be burned or market for recoverable materials. Merely sepmating such buried is becoming an urgent priority for towns and cities. products from other trash does not guarantee their reuse. Most around the country. Each year. Americans produce about 160 recycling efforts focus on a relatively small m►mber of com- million tons of residential and commercial waste, but only modities: aluminum, steel and iron, glass, paler. certain plas- around I 1 percent — 17 million tons — is eventually tics and rubber: reclaimed. Meanwhile, most specialists agree that well -run recycling programs might recover up to 25 percent of the total Materials Recycled in the U.S.. 1986 waste stream — thereby decreasing by another 22 million tons the amount of trash destined for landfills or combustion plants. Amount Amount % of Generated Recycled Total What is recycling? (millions of tons) (millionc of tons) Waste Paper Recycling involves three basic steps: and paperboard 64.7 1-1 6 9.2 Glass 12.9 1.1 0.7 • Separating reusable products from other trash, often Metals 13.7 1.0 0.6 when these products are discarded but sometimes at a Plastics 10.3 1►. I 0.1 central facility. Rubber and leather 4.0 t►. I 0.1 • Processing them so that they can be substituted for vir- Textiles 2.8 0 0 0.0 gin raw materials at manufacturing plants. Wood 5.8 0 0 0.0 Food Waste 12.5 0 0 0.0 • Returning them to commerce, usually as part of other Yard Waste 28.3 t► t► 0.0 products. Common examples include newsprint, which Other 2.7 0.0 0.0 can be processed to make new newsprint or tissue, and _ _ Total 157.7 17 1 ► 10.7 cardboard, which can be reused in packaging. Source: Franklin Associates. Characterisation o/ ► ioticipal solid Wastes in the United States. 1960 to 2000. Preparr, I for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (Update. 19881. For more information, contact: Darlene Snow Manager. Waste Recycling Programs 202/659-4613 ® Copyright 1989 by NSWMA National Solid Wastes Management Association 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW Suite 1000 Washington. DC 20036 Printed on recycled paper d� How recycling programs work At present, hundreds of communities throughout the country have organized some sort of recycling program. Such programs usually follow one of four basic patterns: • Household separation/curbside collection. Individual households are encouraged (or required) to sort reusable materials — for example, bottles, cans and newspapers — before putting them at the curbside for collection. Such materials may be placed in special containers or bagged separately from ordinary trash. • Material recoveryfacilities. To make household sepa- ration as simple as possible, many communities are collecting recyclables mixed in one container. These materials must then be taken to a material recovery facility (MRF) for sorting and processing. At least 16 MRFs now operate around the country; most of these are concentrated on the East Coast and others are under construction. • Centralized recovery. Unsorted trash is collected and taken to central facilities, usually landfills or transfer stations. There workers separate recyclables from other rubbish. • Drop-off centers. Consumers separate newspapers, bottles, cans or other materials at home and deliver them to designated collection points. This is the most common form of recycling in the country. Many communities have discovered that public response to recycling programs is best when such programs are easy to use. Local governments and private haulers often provide spe- cial containers for recyclables which can be color -coded for different materials. Participation rates also rise where pro- grams offer curbside pickup on the same day as regular trash. A few communities have already reported significant waste reduction levels: Portland, Oregon 26% Montclair, New Jersey 30% Islip, New York 35% Although most programs rely on publi education to sustain these levels, at least nine states no%% ' i x mandatory goals. These states often set targets for recv, iincy 25% or more of local waste streams within a specific nuni',er of years. Where such requirements exist, city and t(l ., 20vernments have usually fired penalties for failing to separate recyclables, adhere to collection schedules or follow otk i simple proce- dures. These penalties include warnings wit tines; in extreme cases, municipal officials may even refuse it - hick up a viola- tor's trash. What is recycled? Paper: Our No. 1 Recyclable According to the American Paper Inainne, annual con- sumption of paper and related products in dw U.S. has risen to 85.5 million tons. Using figures from 1988. the Institute calcu- lates that 20.1 million tons — 24 percent of 'he total — was reclaimed by domestic mills. Of this amonmr 13.5 million tons were recovered from "post -consumer" wasi,• � and the rest included mill scraps and other manufacturim hyproducts. In addition, 5.6 million tons were recovered aml exported to for- eign buyers. How is recycled paper used? API repw v. that more than half was employed to make paperboard. anvilier 25 percent was processed for tissue, newsprint and simi',r purposes. Waste paper was also recycled for insulation molded packag- ing (like egg cartons) and cushioning materi;,k for packing and transportation. Two other points are significant: • 35% of all newspapers published in 1 1.48 were col- lected and recycled — up from 33�(' I I is vear before. • Nearly half of the country's corn►gatt ,1 boxes were reused, a 5% increase over 1987. Why not recN de everything? Recycling I..0 captured the public imagination. Accord- ing to NSWMA . pinion polls, most Americans believe that recovering 25 to i I percent of our waste would largely solve the country's ga, t .,_ disposal problem. But the success of any recycling pry._ rant goes far beyond encouraging heavy public participate n in collection programs. Whether rL cling efforts succeed or fail will depend in large measure on i ending new buyers for reusable materials and then assurin-_ them a steady supply. In many communities, this process is ah: ady underway. Responding to slack demand for waste paper h , domestic markets, for example, city offi- cials in Los Anz, I:, now ship as much as 1,0(1l) tons per day to mills in China •similarly, large waste collection companies ha),e recently ci...i:d joint ventures with -plastics manufactur- ers to build ne%k i..ychng plants. But significant barriers remain to be • Market, % .a y by region. Mandatory collection of news- paper in ij,.,ny East Coast cities has caused prices to plummet. ii, several instances, brokers even charge a fee to reii.w a such paper. Meanwhile, recyclers in many pa, i , of the country cannot always find a buyer for their I.I.,stic bottles because all seven companies that reclauu PET are located in the East. • Not ever. ming can be recycled. Oily rags, paper mixed With food csidues, disposable diapers and many "multim:a, rial products" are not likely to find a buyer. • Virgin ra%. materials are often cheaper than recycled products. In some cases, such differences are rein- forced b) iax policies (e.g. depletion allowances for mining an.I oil production) or by long distance freight rates whit Ii may favor virgin feedstock. Despite the drawbacks, recycling will play a major role in resolving ,.ur country's mounting disposal capacity problem. Perhap, the most significant outcome will be to extend the life of,: Fisting landfills and permit batter planning of waste-to-ener!_�. plants. Landfills can then be reserved for trash that cannot I,,: handled in other ways. Recycling: Part of America's Future Recycling represents an essential part of our country's waste management system. Along with other components of that system — waste reduction, landfills and combustion plants — it will allow municipal officials to take maximum advantage of limited disposal capacity. As new markets are found and new technologies develop, recycling programs may soon include products that cannot presently be reused. And finally, by providing manufacturers with feedstocks that have already undergone extensive processing, such programs will play a significant role in limiting the sources of air and water emissions that could threaten our environment. What is the Waste Recyclers Council? The Waste Recyclers Council (WRC) brings together members of the National Solid Wastes Management Association to promote recycling in North America. Council members include refuse collectors, processors, brokers and companies that use recyclable materials. Current priorities focus on developing new markets for these materials, informing public officials about the need for more effective recycling programs, and shaping state and federal policies. In 1988, WRC member firms that responded to a survey reported recovering these materials: Material Tons Collected Paper 1,470,000 Aluminum Cans 40,000 Ferrous Metal 1,150,000 Glass 20,000 Plastics 17,000 Yard Waste 153,000 Total: 2,850,000 9-419/9M Aluminum Cans Although aitirim-tun cans make up only 0.5 percent of our total solid waste stt,:am, they represent a unique recycling success story. Reffnin, hauxite ore for finished aluminum is an energy -intensive att.l t:osily process. Despite relatively low bauxite prices, thereftt,: , recycled aluminum commands the highest price of all wa , materials — over $500 per ton. More than 42.5 billion alun—tont cans (55% of the nation's total) are now collected and rew . d every year. And by the 1990s, manufacturers plan it, increase this proportion to 75 percent. Plastics Plastic material- !lave received intense scrutiny as one of the most visible and I.. I,:st growing components of the waste stream. Even so. EPA :,tiniates that plastics account for just 71:4 of municipal solid .. asie (by weight), or about 16% of the total volume. Unlike paper an, I Mass, however, only a small amount of the plastics manufacut..d each year — about I % — are recycled. To increase t ,:covery rates for plastic products, the chemical industry is sl,onsoring research into recycling tech- nology and is finding u.:w uses for "post -consumer" resins. Nlost research is focus.:d on recovering beverage bottles: industry specialists pi, diet that 50% of these containers may be recycled within the next four or five years. Plasti.. Packaging by Type of Resin 4.0% 1.9% 9.3% 9.5% 28 Here is how some of these resins are reused: • In 1987, 150 million pounds of PET were recycled (15% of all packaging made from PET) into products such as fiberfill, carpeting, and non-food bottles. • 70 million pounds of HDPE (1.6% of HDPE packag- ing) were reformulated for flower pots, drainage pipes, marine piers and other uses. • Mixed plastic waste calf be molded into lumber, park benches and picnic tables. • In the Northeast, two new processing plants have recently opened to recycle polystyrene collected from fast food restaurants and institutions. Products will include pencil cups and other office supplies. Other Materials A wide range of other materials are commonly recycled: • 5 billion glass bottles and jars — about 12 percent of the country's total — are crushed into "tulle[" and melted down to make new containers. Cullet is also used to make fiberglass and asphalt. • Yard waste (amounting to 18% of the nation's total waste stream) can be composted for sale to local gar- deners, commercial landscapers or even large institu- tions. Presently, more than 650 composting projects are operating in 30 states around the country. • 27 percent of the 240 million automobile tires dis- carded every year are reclaimed. The majority are re- 40.4% capped, others are used for new rubber products, road- beds and reef construction. ❑ LDPE (garbage bag, . nd bread wrappers) 40.4% ❑ HDPE (milk and deic. _ent bottles, base cups on soda containers) 28.4% ❑ Polypropylene (lid, -A heavy wrappers) 9.5% m Polystyrene ("clam,l, il," and dairy containers) 9.3% ❑ PGT (primanly suit .tonk containers) 6.5% 8 PVC (cooking oil o-ia.tiners, fax) wrappers) 4.0% © Uther 1.91S Total: 15.2 billion Ib Source: Society for the I Li%tics Industry, Facts and Figures of the L .V P6rstirs Industry. V..t,hington. D.C.. 1988. I I I E W CZ CD I cz ! CZ Co r. 2 O CD Q� O ♦♦♦^^� v! cz w - cz 0-0 O — O CO �-- O L >, o i U co L � CZ CZ Z O c CD E cc z-a aC13 W x Q~ C .� L 4) U z J cn `o a 0 z Q o •- z00 c W U a. cr. J m c .�� im IN STATE GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS A. Planning Process 1. Collection and Evaluation of Data 3. Develop Goals and Objectives 2. Identification of Problems 4. Recommend Actions B. Geographic Area 1. Region - Entire Area of Regional Planning Agency 2. Local - Geographical Area of One or More Local Governments C. Management Activities to Consider 1. Collection 2. Transportation 3. Storage 4. Transfer 5. Resource Conserv. & Recovery 6. Processing 7. Treatment 8. Disposal 9. Mgmt. & Institutional Arrangements 10. Costs & Financing D. Waste Types to Consider - All waste types; emphasis on potential adverse effects. May include: 1. Hazardous 5. Recreational 9. Industrial 2. Residential 6. Military 10. Mining 3. Commercial _7-. Sludge 11. Agricultural 4. Institutional 8. Septic & Grease E. Planning Period 1. Regional: 15 Years 2. Local: 6-10 Years F. Plan Content A written public policy statement which identifies problems; gives demographic, socio-economic, and waste management data, evaluates data, states goals and objectives; and recommends actions and timetables to accomplish goals and objectives. G. Coordination - (As Applicable) 1. Federal Agencies: U.S. EPA 3. Local Governments 2. State Agencies: TDH, TWC, RRCT, TACB 4. Districts & Authorities H. Approval Process 1. Regional a. Consistent with State Plan b. Normal Regional Agency Adoption Procedures c. TDH 2. Local a. Consistent with State Plan b. Consistent with Regional Plan c. Normal Local Government Adoption Procedures (All Involved) d. Coordinate with Regional Planning Agency e. TDH 3. TDH Review a. Commissioner -Public Comment Period -Board Approval by Rule b. Commissioner Disapproves -Stating Deficiencies c. May be Corrected and Resubmitted Texas A>dninistrative Code Sections 325.561 - 325.568 These rules are prarulgated pursu- ant to the Carprehensive Mmicipal Solid Waste %nagement, Resource Recovery, and Conservation Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7c, Section S i)- k and Section 11(c)(3). . Section 325.561. Purpose and Scope. (a) Purpose. The Sections in this Subchapter are intended to guide in the development and implementation of re- gional and local solid waste management plans. They specify the required and recannended content of regional and local solid waste management plans, provide for coordination with other programs and public participation, es- tablish criteria for regional and local plan submission and approval, and set out criteria for financial assistance to regional and local governments for the development of regional and local solid waste management plans.* (b) Scope. (1) Planning process. A re- gional or local solid waste. management plan shall be the result of a planning process related to proper management of solid waste in the planning area under consideration. The process shall in- clude identification of problems and collection and evaluation of data neces- sary to provide a written public state- ment of goals and objectives and the actions recarmended to accomplish •.those., goals and objectives. (2) Geographic area. A re- gional solid waste management plan shall consider the entire area within an iden- tifled planning region, and it shall provide an overview of the solid waste management situation throughout the re- gion. A local solid waste management plan shall consider all of the area within the jurisdiction of one or . more local governments, but it shall not include an entire planning region. It shall be more specific than a regional plan in addressing solid waste manage- ment problems and in providing for im- plementation. (3) Management activities. The regional plan shall provide an over- view of solid waste management activi- ties, including institutional arrange- ments and options for private sector involvement, with particular emphasis on identifying priorities and factors which need more detailed consideration at the local level. The local plan should address local activities, including con- tractual agreements, in a manner that is specific enough to provide for implemen- tation of suggested courses of action. Aspects of solid waste management listed in Subparagraphs (A)-(J) of this Para- graph shall be considered, as appropri- ate: (A) Collection; (B) Transportation; (C) Storage; (D) Transfer; (E) Resource conservation and recovery: (i) source separation; (ii) incineration; (iii) gasification; and (iv) methane recovery; (F) Processing; (G) Treatment; (H) Disposal; ( I ) lknagement and insti- tutional arrangements, including public and private sector involvement; (J) Costs and financing. (4) Waste types. (A) The regional or local plan shall address all solid wastes in the particular region or local area to the extent the wastes impact upon munic- ipal operations, systems, or'facilities. Particular emphasis shall be placed on waste that possesses the potential for adverse effects to health or the envi- ronment or which provides the opportuni- ty for resource conservation or recov- ery. (B) The regional or local plan shall consider, where appropriate, i 0 RIC, Inc. 1986 11 L I� DEPARl'YIFNT CF HEAI,'IH (1 / 8 6 ) th t e ypes of solid waste listed in Clauses (i)-(iv) of this Subparagraph. Kcal governnmt--A county, city, or political subdivision M hazardous waste; (ii) of the State exercising authority granted under residential, com- mercial, institutional, and recreational the Solid Waste Disposal Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7, Section waste; 36. (iii' waste fr an mili- tary reservations and'.nstallations; Planning --Includes collecting information, identifying problems, de- O v) municipal sludge: fining goals and objectives, analyzing (I) wastewater treatment plant sludge; alternatives, and determining necessary activities '(II) water supply and courses of action needed to achieve identified goals and objec- treatment plant sludge; tives. (III) septage and other vacuum truck waste; and Planning fund --The municipal solid waste (IV) grease and grit trap wastes; management planning fund created in the State treasury by the (C) The regional or local Omprehensive Minicipal Solid %kiste Mn- agenent, Resource Recovery, and Cbnser- plan should address, where applicable, wastes which nay be governed by separate vation Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Arti- rules under the jurisdiction of other cle 4477-7c. Planning period --A projected - departments. Addressing these wastes is considered applicable where they impact period of time a planning entity uses in the development upon municipal operations, systems, or of a solid waste manage - ment plan. facilities. The wastes which may need to be addressed: Planning region --a region of M industrial wastes; the State identified by the Governor as an appropriate region for municipal 00 mining wastes; and (iii) solid waste planning. agricultural wastes. Private operator --A person, Section 325.562. Definitions of Terms other than a goverrtnent or governmental subdivision and Abbreviations. or agency, engaged in some aspect of operating a solid waste man - The following words and terms, when used in this Subchapter, shall have the agenent system. The term includes any entity following meanings, unless the context other than a goverrrnent or gov- erntnental subdivision or agency, owned clearly indicates otherwise. and operated by investment of_ private Advisory council --The Minici- capital. pal Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Advisory Council. Property --Land, structures, Board --The Texas Board of Health. ' '' I.. • interests in land, air rights, water rights, and rights that accamany inter - City --An incorporated city or ests in land, structures, water rights, and air rights and includes easements, town in.the State. Governing body --The city coun-, rights -of -way, uses, leases, incorporeal hereditaments, legal and equitable es- cil, commissioners court, board of di- rectors, trustees, ' or similar body tates, interest, or rights such as terms for charged 'by law with governing a public years and liens. Provide for --Explain, estab- agency. Implementation --Putting "the lIsh, or set forth steps or courses of actions. plan into practice by carrying out, planned activities, including compliance Public agency --A city, county, district, or authority created and enforcement activities, or ensuring and oper- ating under the Texas Constitution, such activities are carried out. Article III, Section 52 b)(1) or 2 or Inactive facility --A facility which no longer receives solid waste. , Article XVI, Section 59, or a combina- tion of two or rmre of these goverrmen- r • 0 RIG, Inc. 1986 IM :al entities acting under an interlocal agreenent and having the authority under the Camrehensive Nbnicipal Solid Waste .Management, Resource. Recovery, and Con- servation Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7c, or other laws to own and operate a solid waste management system. Regional or' local solid waste management plan --A plan adopted by a planning region or local govertment under authority of 'the Comprehensive lbnicipa1 Solid Waste Vianagement, - Re- source Recovery, and Conservation Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7c, Section 7. Resolution --A resolution, or- der, ordinance, or other action of a governing body. ' Solid waste management --The systematic control of any or all of 'the following activities: (A) Generation; (B) Source separation; (C) Collection; (D) Handling; (E) Storage; (F) Transportation; (G) Processing; (H) Treatment; (I) Resource recovery;•or (J) Disposal of solid waste. Solid waste management sys- ten--Any plant, cmVosting process plant, incinerator, sanitary landfill, transfer station or other works and equipment acquired, 'installed, or oper- ated for the purpose of collecting, handling, storing, processing, recover- ing material or energy, or disposing of solid waste and includes sites for these works and equipmxent. Solid waste resource recovery systan--Any real property, buildings, structures, plants,, works, facilities, equipment, pipelines, machinery, vehi- cles, vessels, rolling stock, licenses, or franchises used or useful in connec- tion with the processing of solid waste to extract, recover, reclaim, salvage, reduce, concentrate, or convert to ener- gy or useful matter or•resources, what- ever their form, including electricity, steam, or other forms of energy, and metal, fertilizer, ;lass, or other forms of material and resources, fran such solid waste, and includes any real prop- erty, buildings, structures, plants, works, facilities, pipelines, machinery, vehicles, vessels, rolling stock, licenses, or franchises used or useful in: (A) The transportation, receipt, storage, transfer, and handling of solid waste; (B) The preparation, sep- aration, or processing of solid waste for reuse; (C) The handling and transportation of recovered matter, re- sources, or energy; and (D) The handling, trans- portation, and disposal of any nonrecov- erable solid•waste residue. State solid waste management plan --The solid waste manage3mnt plan for Texas. Technical assistance fund --The municipal waste resource recovery ap- plied research and technical assistance fund created in the State treasury by the CaTprehensive 14micipal Solid Waste Nknagement, Resource Recovery, and Con- servation' Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7c. Variance --The granting of re- lief fran the terms or conditions of a plan by the Cammissioner. Section 325.563. Regional and Local Plan Requirements. (a) Regional plans. A regional plan identifies the problems, goals, objectives, and reconnended actions for solid waste management over a long-range period for the entire planning region. (1) Geographic scope. The geographic scope of the regional plan- ning process shall be the entire plan- ning region designated by the Governor. The 'regional plan shall use the four types of planning units listed in Sub- paragraphs (A)-(D) of this Paragraph as appropriate for the information present- ed. It is not anticipated that the regional plan will present site -specific information. (A) Snell geographic ar- eas such as census tracts or city bound- ® RPC, Inc. 1986 aries for the rmst detailed data collec- tion and manipulation. (B) Planning areas to be used for the assessment of problems and the evaluation of alternatives. These planning areas shall be aggregations of small geographic areas. (C) County boundaries for the summarization and presentation of key information.. (D) The entire planning region. (2) Planning periods. The regional planning process shall address solid waste management over a long-range period. Long range is considered to be a period of at least .15 years. The rraximum planning period addressed by the plan shall be stated on the plan. cover and title page and at other appropriate locations within the body of the plan. The regional plan shall use the four planning periods listed in Subparagraphs (A)-(D) of this Paragraph -as appropriate for the information presented. (A)- Current and histori- cal information; (B) Short-range planning period, one to five years, with specific information presented by year; (C) Intermediate plan- ning, six to 10 years, with information in less detail; (D) Long-range planning period, 11 to 15 years or longer, with information in the least detail. (3) Plan content. A regional plan shall be the.result of a planning process related to,the proper management of solid waste in the planning. region. The process shall include identification of problems and collection and. evalua- tion of the data necessary to provide a written public statement of goals and objectives and actions recammended to accon4lish those goals and objectives. The regional plan shall include: • (A); Population patterns, carnnercial and industrial data, and other • demographic information necessary to estimate solid waste quantities and characteristics; • , - . , • . (B) Estimates of current and future solid waste wmunts by type; (C) Current and planned solid waste management activities in the region and an assessment of the adequacy of existing resource recovery, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal facilities and practices; (D) Identification ofv public and private n-anag anent agencies and responsibilities; (E) Identification of solid waste management problems and establishment of priorities for address- ing those problems; (F) Planning areas and agencies with ecramn solid waste manage- ment problems which could be addressed through joint action; (G) Incentives and bar- riers for waste reduction and resource recovery, 'including identification of potential markets; (H) Regional goals and objectives; (I) Advantages and dis- advantages of alternative actions; and W The recommended plan of action and associated timetable, including the need for new or expanded facilities and practices. (4) Special considerations or restrictions. The regional plan shall not prohibit, in fact or by effect irrportation or exportation of waste fr one political jurisdiction into another. (b) Focal plans. A local plan addresses specific short- or long-range problems and actions related to solid waste management within the jurisdiction of one or rmre local governIInents and may be developed regardless of whether a regional plan has been developed which will affect the local planning area. (1) Geographic scope. The geographic scope of the local planning process shall be the jurisdiction of one ,or nm imre local governments with eaT=n problems or needs, but shall not include the entire planning region. 'fie local plan shall use the three types of plan- ning units listed in Subparagraphs (A)- (C) In this Paragraph as appropriate for the information presented. In certain cases, the local plan may present site - specific information. 0 RFC, Inc. 1986 (3) mall geographic ar- eas such as census tracts or city bound- aries for the most detailed data collec- tion and manipulation. These small areas should be the same as those used in the regional plan. (B) Planning areas to be used for the assessment of problems and the evaluation of alternatives. These planning areas should be aggregations of the smell geographic areas. (C) The entire area en- compassed by the local plan. (2) Planning periods. The local planning process shall address specific short- or long-range problems and actions in solid waste management. The naximm planning period addressed by the plan shall be stated on the plan cover and title page and at other appro- priate locations within the body of the plan. The local plan should use the planning periods listed in Subparagraphs (A)-(D) of this Paragraph as appropriate for the information presented. (A) Current and histori- cal information; (B) Short-range planning period, one to five years, with specific information presented by year; (C) Intermediate plan- ning period, six to 10 years, with in- formation in less detail; (D) Long-range planning period, 11 to 15 years or longer. (3) Plan content. A local plan shall be the result of a planning process that is related to the proper management of solid waste in the local planning area. The process shall in- clude identification of problems and collection and evaluation of the data necessary- to provide a written public statement of goals and objectives and the actions recommended to accomplish those goals and objectives. As appli- cable, the local plan -should include: . (A) Population and com- mercial and industrial data Fran the regional planning process, supplemented with other local demographic information as necessary; - 1 • • (B) Composition, charac- teristics, and amounts of waste, by type, which affect the local planning area; (C) Identification of the short- and long-range solid waste management problems within the local planning area; (D) Local goals and ob- jectives associated with rmnagement problems; (E) Advantages and dis- advantages of alternative actions; and (F) The recommended plan of action and associated timetable for acemplishing the goals and objectives. (4) Special considerations or restrictions. " The local plan shall not prohibit, in fact or by effect, importa- tion or exportation of waste fran one political jurisdiction to another. Section 325.564. Coordination With Other Programs. (a) All solid waste plans shall be consistent with provisions established by federal, state, and local programs that affect solid waste management and shall consider programs and requirements from: (1) Federal jurisdiction--U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2) State jurisdiction: (A) Texas Department of Health; (B) Texas Department of Water Resources: (C) Railroad Commission of Texas; (D) Texas Air Control Board; and (E) Other state agencies. (3) Substate jurisdiction: (A) Regional planning agencies; (B) Special districts or authorities; (C) Counties; and (D) Cities. (b) All solid waste management plans shall consider other programs and tD RFC, Inc. 1986 responsibilities with the aim of avoid- ing duplication of effort and gaps in program coverage. Section 325.565. Public Participation Requirements for Solid Waste Plans. (a) Advisory emmittee. An advi- sory committee shall be convened to provide input, review, and camment dur- ing development of regional and local plans. Conmittee members shall be ap- pointed who represent a broad range of interests, including a representative of the Department, public officials, pri- vate operators, citizen groups, and interested individuals. (b) Governmental review. Local governments affected by regional plans shall be given opportunities for review and comment on relevant portions of the plan, including adequate notice of pub- lic hearings conducted on the plans. Local plans shall be submitted to appro- priate regional planning agencies for review and cannent. (c) Public hearing. A public hearing shall be held prior to adoption of a regional or local plan for the purpose of receiving comnent and testi- mnnv from interested parties. (d) Notice and availability. Plan- ning reports and documents shall be made available to interested persons at loca- tions of convenience. Notice of availa- bility of documents and of public hear- ings and meetings shall be advertised in newspapers of general circulation in the area affected by the plan. Proper no- tice shall be provided a minimum of 15 days in advance of the hearing. The notice shall include meeting time, loca- tion, and subjects to be discussed. (e) Plan approval. Local and regional solid waste management - plans shall be approved by the governing body of the responsible entity before being submitted to the Department for ap- proval. Section 325.566. Procedures for Re- gional and Local Plan Submission and Approval. (a) Prior to the submission of a plan, the plan shall be adopted by the regional planning agency or local gov- ernment(s) pursuant to applicable admin- istrative procedures. Local governments shall coordinate with the appropriate regional solid waste planning agency and ensure the plan is consistent with any regional solid waste management plan in effect for the region encompassing the jurisdiction of the local government, if a regional plan has been approved by the Department. (b) Within 90 days after a region- al or local plan has been submitted, the Commissioner will tentatively determine if the plan conforms to this Subchapter and the State solid waste management plan. The Commissioner will canunieate this determination to the agency which submitted the plan. If the plan is not in conformance, a notice of deficiencies will be provided to the planning agency within 30 days of the tentative disap- proval. The Commissioner has authority to disapprove any plan which has defi- ciencies. Disapproved plans will not be considered by the Board until the •Can- missioner determines that deficiencies have been corrected, unless the appli- cant submits a request for aDDeal to the Board. In order for a plan to be con- sidered under such circumstances, the appeal nest be in writing and must be submitted to the Commissioner within 30 days following the day the applicant receives notification of tentative plan disapproval by the Cannissioner. (e) If the Comnissioner tentative- ly determines a regional or local plan meets the requirements of this Subchap- ter, is in conformance with the State solid waste management plan, and should be approved, the CMmmissioner will sub- mit the plan to the Board, which, if it concurs with the C mmissioner's approv- al, shall approve a plan by adopting a rule An accordance with the Administra- tive Procedure and Texas Register Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6252-13a. Board action on the plan will normally occur within 60 days of the tentative decision by the Commissioner to approve the plan, but the approval will not be effective until the plan has completed the rulemaking process specified by the Administrative Procedure and Texas Reg- ister Act, i.e., publication of the 0 RFC, Inc. 1986 'T W Di MME4I' OF HEALTH (1, 3 6 ) 117 proposed action in the Texas Register, a 30-day puolic comment period, and puoli- cation of the final rule action in the Texas Register. If approved, the Carr issioner will notify the planning agen- cy of the Board's approval. In the event t;ie plan is not approved, 'the Board will state the plan's deficien- cies, and the Commissioner will immedi- ately notify the planning agency of the Board's decision and the plan's defi- ciencies. The plan may be resubmitted for approval if the Commissioner deter- mines that deficiencies have been cor- rected. (d) If a regional or local solid waste management plan is adopted by rule of the Board, public and private solid waste management activities and State regulatory activities shall conform to the adopted regional �or local solid waste management plan. The plan shall only remain in effect during the plan- ning period defined in the plan. When the effective date or planning period has passed or expired, requirements or restrictions of the plan shall no longer be binding. Under procedures and crite- ria of Subsections (g) and (h) of this Section, the Commissioner may grant a rvariance from an adopted regional or local solid waste management plan. (e) If a portion of a regional or local plan is determined by the Cmmis- sioner to no longer be in compliance with the State solid waste management plan or these Sections, the Commissioner may request that the regional body or local government revise the plan. If such a revision is not submitted to' the Department within 180 days,- the Commis- sioner may ask the Board to withdraw its approval of that portion of the plan. (f) A planning agency may submit revisions or updates to an approved plan that reflect new information or changed conditions. These revisions shall be considered by the same procedures as original plan submission and approval. (g) Upon application, the Ccmnis- sioner may grant a variance from an adopted regional or local solid waste management plan when: (1) Application of the plan creates unnecessary hardship; (2) Equally safe, effective methods could be used; (3) Practical difficulties are encountered in meeting the require- ments of a plan; or (4) Deviation or exception would not affect substantial compliance with the plan and not threaten health or safety. (h) If the Commissioner intends to grant a variance fran the requirements of a plan, the Department will offer the opportunity for a public hearing on the matter prior to the Cammissioner's final decision. The hearing, if requested, will be advertised and conducted within the area affected by -the plan. Section 325.567. Financial Assistance for Local and Regional Plans. (a) Authority. The municipal sol- id waste management planning fund is established by the Comprehensive Munici- pal Solid Waste N-knagement, Resource Recovery, and Conservation Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-c, Section 8, as a special fund in the State trea- sury to be used to provide financial assistance to local governments and planning regions for the development of regional and local solid waste manage- ment plans. (b) Administration of the planning fund. (1) The Commissioner shall administer the financial assistance pro- gram and the planning fund under the direction of the Board. (2) An applicant for finan- cial assistance from the planning fund shall agree to comply with the State solid waste management plan, the Depart- ment's municipal solid waste management rules, and any other requirements adopt- ed by the Board. The scope of work for the planning effort shall be mutually agreed upon by the Department and the applicant. (3) The Department shall not authorize release of funds under an application for financial assistance ®RFC, Inc. 1986 118 TEXAS DEPARIlViF U OF HEALTH (1 / 86 ) until the applicant has furnished the Department with a resolution adopted by the governing body of each public agency or planning region which is a party to the application certifying that: (A) The applicant will camply with the provisions of the finan- cial assistance program and the require- ments of the Department;- (B) The grant will only be used for the purposes for which it was provided; and - (C) Regional or local solid waste management plans developed with State financial assistance will be adopted by the governing body. (4) The planning fund shall not be used for the preparation of final design and working drawings, construc- tion, acquisition of land or an interest in land, or payment for recovered re- sources. (5) Financial assistance pro- vided by the Department to any public agency or planning region under this Section shall be matched, at least equally, by funds provided by the re- cipient. In -kind matches are permis- sible at the discretion of the Depart- ment. (6) The order of priority to be given to applicants- in receiving financial assistance shall be determined by: • (A) The need to initiate or improve the solid waste management programs within the applicant's juris- diction; (B) The needs of the State; (C) The financial need of the applicant; and (D) The degree the pro- posed plan work program will result in inprovenents that meet the requirements of other applicable state, regional, and local solid waste management plans or activities. s a (7) The Department may ap- prove an application consistent with the provisions of this Section when the Department finds state financial partic- ipation is in the public intP-?st and when it is determined that bc--n state and regional or local funding is suffi- cient to complete the agreed scope of services. The Department shall approve or disapprove -an application for finan- cial assistance within 90 days of its receipt. (a) Regional planning financial assistance. (1) When available, alloca- tion of funds to regional planning agen- cies for development of regional solid waste management plans shall be made on the basis outlined in Subparagraphs W- (D) of this Paragraph. (A) Minin m funding shall be for $30,000 for one year with a pos- sible time and funding extension of as much as one year. Except for the figure listed in Subparagraph (C) of this Para- graph, this amount and other amounts outlined by this Paragraph include amounts required as matching by substate agencies. (B) Additional funding may be authorized based on: 0 ) population (five cents per capita); 00 number of coun- ties affected ($500 each); and (III) nurber -of incor- porated cities affected ($200 each). (C) The maximrn annual funding provided by the State to any region in a single calendar year shall not exceed $125,000. (D) Regional planning agencies shall provide at least a 50 percent match for any State financial assistance. In -kind matches are permit- ted at the discretion of the Department. (d) Local plan financial assis- tance. p RPC, Inc. 1986 T'MS EEPA MI Nr CF HEALTH (1 / 86 ) 119 (1) General requirements for local plan financial assistance are the same as -for regional plan financial ,,,,assistance. (2) Financial assistance for local governments shall be provided as follows: (A) A minimm amount of $5,000 shall be required for each local plan. As such as 50 percent of this amount nay be provided by the State, with the remainder provided by the local goverrrnent . (B) Additional funding shall be at the rate of 10 cents per capita; • (C) No mire than $50,000 shall be pade available in any one year to a local goverrment; (D) Local governments shall provide at least a 50 percent match for any State financial assis- tance. In -kind patches are permitted at the discretion of the Department. Section 325.568. Approved State, Re- gional, and Loml Solid Waste Managenent Plans. (a) Purpose. This Section adopts State, regional, and local solid waste management plans which have been ap- proved by the Board of Health. As specified in Section 325.566(d) of this title (relating to Procedures for re- gional and Local Plan Submission and Approval), public and private solid waste management activities and State regulatory activities within the. geo- graphical boundaries where the plan is applicable shall conform to an adopted plan during its effective period. (b) State plan. The Department adopts by reference the Solid Rkste Management Plan for Texas, 1980-1986, Volume 1, Mmicipal Solid Waste, as the State plan for solid waste over which the Department has jurisdiction. The plan was approved by the Board of Health on January 31, 1981, and the effective, period is from that date until December 31, 1986. Because +jurisdiction over minicipal hazardous waste has been changed since plan approval, provisions in the plan which are related to hazard- ous waste are no longer applicable. Department, regional, and local activ- ities shall conform to those provisions which remain applicable in the adopted State plan. Copies of the State plan are available for public inspection during regular working hours at the IM Bureau of Solid Waste Management, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas. (e) Regional plans. (1) Plans approved. The De- partment has approved and hereby adopts by reference the Action Guide for Solid Waste Management in the H-GC Region, 1985-2000, which was developed by the Houston -Galveston Area Council and adopted by the council's board of direc- tors on June 18, 1985. The effective period of department approval is from January 15, 1986, to Decerner 31, 2000. Copies of this document are available for public inspection during regular working hours at the TM Bureau of Solid Waste Management, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin; IM Region 11 office, 1100 Avenue G, Rosenberg; and offices of the Houston -Galveston Area Council, 3555 Tirmnns Lane (Keplinger Building), Houston. (2) Conflicting provisions. By adopting a regional plan, the Depart- ment has determined that the plan has been developed according to Departmental rules and does not conflict with the State plan. It if should later be de- termined that provisions of a regional plan do conflict with provisions of the adopted State plan, then provisions of the State plan shall prevail. (3) Agency responsibilities. It shall be the responsibility of the regional planning agency to coordinate the implementation of regional policies and recarmended actions in an approved regional plan and coordinate local plan- ning efforts. It shall be the respon- sibility of affected local governments to implement the pol cies and recom- mended actions of aniadopted regional plan and to maintain policies and activ- ities that do not conflict with provi- sions in State and regional plans. The i� • ®RFC, Inc. 1986 120 TEXAS DEPARTVWr OF HE4tLTR (4 / 86 ) RUES Department shall consider provisions of an approved regional plan when reviewing an application for a permit for a facility to be located in the area affected by an approved plan. (4) Applicability. Provi- sions in a regional plan apply only to applications for a permit which are filed with the Department after the effective date of the plan's approval by the Texas Board of Health. ':0N 1 25 Texas Administrative Code Sections 325.601 - 325.603' Section 325.601. Purpose and Appli- cability. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the annual facility fee is to recover a portion of the costs incurred by the State in operating the Department's mmicipal solid waste regulatory pro- gram. (b) Applicability. Each operator of a storage, processing, or disposal facility for mmicipal solid waste that is authorized to operate by permit, has a permit application pending, or was operating prior to inplenrentation of the Department's permitting program and is required to apply for a permit from the Department is required to pay a nonre- fundable annual fee to the Department. Except for a gas recovery operation, the mmunt of the fee is based upon the type and size of the facility and the annunt of waste handled or the armunt of 'popu- lation served. Gas recovery operations are charged a fixed rate. A Section 325.602. Amusl Reports. ''` (a) Report form and Information. Annually, each facility operator shall report- to the Department the amount of solid waste stored,- processed, or dis- posld of at the facility for which the report Is prepared. An operator shall Mi a fsparate report for each facility which has a unique permit/permit appli- cation number. The report shall be on a form furnished by the Department it reproduced from a form furnished by ".e ')epartment. In ar:ition to a - .ateme ;t -f the amount c raste processed u :isposed, the report shall contain the infornation requested on the form, in- cluding the facility owner's name, ad- dress, and phone number; the facility permit/permit application nurrber; the facility type; the armunt of population served by the facility; and any assigned billing code number and other informa- tion the Department may request. (b) Waste reporting units. The amount of waste processed or disposed during a year shall'be reported in short tons (2,000 pounds). Any other units of measure, such as cubic yards, shall be converted to tons for reporting pur- poses. The weight and volume conversion factors in Paragraphs (1)- M of this Subsection shall be used where weighing facilities are not available. (1) General weight/voltrm: (A) One ton = 2,000 pounds; (B) One gallon = 7.5 pounds (grease trap waste); (C) One gallon = 8.5 pounds (dry weight --wastewater treatment plant sludge); (D) One gallon = nine pounds (grit trap waste); (E) Qie drum- = 55 gallons. (2) Waste transport vehicles: (A) Qie cubic yard = 150 pounds (no carrpaction); (B) One cubic yard = 600 pounds (medium conpaction); (C) One cubic yard = 700 pounds (heavy compaction); (3) 18tste in landfills: (A) One cubic yard 1,000 pounds (baled with fill); (B) One cubic yard = 800 pounds (shredded with fill); (C) One cubic yard = 650 pounds (corpacted with crawler tractor); •(D) One cubic yard = 700 pounds (with heavy compactor vehicle). (4) Use of population equiv- alent. In determining the armunt of 0 RBC, Inc. 1986 R FJ ESTIMATES OF THE VOLUME OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE AND SELECTED COMPONENTS October 19. 1989 t Executive Summary t Prepared for The Council For Solid Waste Solutions Dr. Ronald N. Uesemer, Vice President. Technology By Franklin Associates, Ltd. Prairie Village. Kansas Robert G. Hunt Veronica R. Sellers William E. Franklin Janet M. Nelson With The Garbage Project Tucson, Arizona William L Rathje Wilson W. Hughes Douglas C. Wilson FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES, LTD. Engineering/Environmental/Nbnagement Consultants 4121 West 83rd Street. Suite 108 Prairie Village. Kansas 66208 913.649.2225 Acknowledgements This work was conducted for The Council for Solid Waste Solutions, under the direction of Dr. Ronald N. Uesemer, Vice President, Technology. At Franklin Associates, Ltd., the work was under the general direction of William E. Franklin, with Robert G. Hunt serving as project leader and principal analyst. The experimental program was conducted by The Garbage Project, Department of Anthropology, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, the University of Arizona. This work was under the general direction of William L. Rathje, Director, with Wilson W. Hughes, Co -Director, serving as the project leader and field supervisor. We express appreciation to Ron Meyerson and Hector Loya, Sanitation Division, Department of Operations, City of Tucson, Arizona, who assisted the project by obtaining fresh refuse samples and coordinating arrangements for the landfill sampling. f •• •1 The current intense debate over federal, state and local waste management policies is taking place in an environment rich in speculation and opinion, but poor in factual evidence about the true contribution of various materials and products to the total quantity of municipal solid waste that must be managed. The fact is that until now, there has been no comprehensive database available to policy -makers and the public that characterizes the volume of the various components of municipal solid waste (MSW). As a result, many estimates have been made and published -- without any real scientific basis -- that have had a profound impact on waste management policies. In the case of plastics, volume estimates reported in the news media have ranged from 30 percent to 70 percent of MSW. This report presents the results of independent research which offers the first comprehensive, systematic characterization of the relative volumes of the components of MSW. The research was sponsored by the Council for Solid Waste Solutions. The report describes the development of an experimentally derived set of conversion factors which have enabled researchers to use an existing database that characterizes the weights of MSW components, to determine the volume of those components in landfills. This research is important because, simply put, landfills do not close because they are overweight, they close because they have reached their volume capacity. 1 Franklin Associates, Ltd., prepares for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a widely used database characterizing the weight of various materials and product categories in municipal solid waste. The challenge presented was to find conversion factors for each product category in MSW that would allow existing weight data to be converted into volume equivalents -- expressed in cubic yards under landfill conditions. A comprehensive search for existing data identified only one source of reliable and scientifically measured weight -to -volume factors -- data from actual landfill excavations conducted by The Garbage Project, of the University of Arizona at Tucson. An analysis of The Garbage Project's database produced a set of conversion factors for most materials. However, in order to ensure a consistent, scientific and more reliable database for the volume of materials in MSW, an experimental program was also initiated as a joint project between Franklin Associates, Ltd. and The Garbage Project. The project involved obtaining samples from landfill excavations. The wastes were sorted by material category and subjected to pressure in a specially designed machine. Representative categories of both plastics and paper products typically disposed in landfills were developed. Weight -to -volume (density) measures were obtained over a designed wide range of conditions. The experiments were carried out by graduate students at the University of Arizona under the direction of Dr. William L Rathje .and Wilson W. Hughes. 2 • • • The research reported here determined that the total volume of plastic products in municipal solid waste was 18 percent in 1986 under landfill conditions. This corresponds to the widely published estimate that plastic products were 7.3 percent by weight of MSW in 1986 as reported in the Franklin Associates, Ltd. waste characterization report for the EPA. The volume(%) -to -weight(%) ratio for plastic products was determined to be (2.5:1). Paper and paperboard are the dominant materials in MSW, occupying 38 percent by volume. Metals account for 14 percent, glass for 2 percent and other materials represent 28 percent -of the volume of municipal solid waste. 1 s% 280% Plastics ® Paper ® Metal 2% ® Glass 0 Other 14% 38% VOLUME OF MATERIALS IN MSW Note: 28% component includes yard wastes In the process of determining weight -to -volume factors for the various materials in the municipal waste stream, Franklin Associates, Ltd. assumed that the density factors for durable products would be similar to the density factors for non -durable products. This assumption was made because the researchers were unable to 3 develop statistically reliable conversion factors for durable products such as appliances, furniture and tires. The disposal of durable products is frequently different from the disposal of other discarded products, such as packaging. Plastic products in MSW, excluding durables, were found to be 16 percent by volume and 6.2 percent by weight for 1986, based on the database developed by Franklin Associates for EPA. Plastics packaging accounted for 27 percent of the total volume of the packaging component in municipal solid waste in 1986. Paper and paperboard amounted to 46 percent of packaging, metals were 15 percent and glass was 7 percent of packaging. 5% 7% 27X 15% ■ Plastics ® Paper ■ Metals ® Glass ❑ Other 46% PACKAGING VOLUMES 4 P] 9 9 The packaging component represented approximately 34 percent of the total volume of municipal solid waste generated in the U.S. in 1986. Plastics packaging accounted for 9 percent of total MSW volume, paper and paperboard packaging amounted to 16 percent, metal containers equaled 5 percent of MSW and glass packaging accounted for 2 percent of the volume of municipal solid waste. 9% 16°ti Plastics Pkg. ® Paper Pkg. 66% 5% Metal Pkg. ® Glass Pkg. 20/. ❑ Other Pkg 2% ® Other MSW PACKAGING VOLUME IN MSW If The volume(%) -to -weight(%) ratio for plastics, which is (2.5:1), is higher than other material categories because plastics are so light in weight. There has been general agreement in the past that plastics occupy a greater percentage of volume than weight in the waste stream. However, as previously indicated, estimates of the volume of plastics in MSW have ranged from 30 percent to 70 percent, compared to the 18 percent result produced by this research which used actual landfill samples. 5 Wolght/Volume Factors: Total MSW Material Weiaht Landfill Volume Bak (%.) N.) Vol.(%)AVL(%) Plastics 7.3 18 2.5:1 Paper/Paperboard 35.6 38 1.1:1 Metal 8.7 14 1.6:1 Glass 8.4 2 0.2:1 Other 40.0 28 0.7:1 Some assessment of error must be made for this new volume database. As will be described in detail in the full report, the experimental values derived from this research are reproducible within +/- 20 percent. Franklin Associates, Ltd. believes these are outside limits and that the actual results may be more accurate. However, the researchers prefer to apply a conservative confidence range to the results of this research because, to our knowledge, it is the first of its kind completed in the U.S. Using the +/- 20 percent confidence range, the maximum volume(%) -to - weight(%) ratio of (2.5:1) is almost certainly between the limits of (2.0:1) and (3.0:1), with (2.5:1) the most probable volume(%) -to -weight(%) ratio for plastics in MSW. Therefore, our estimate that plastics are 18 percent by volume of MSW is almost certainly between the limits of 14 percent and 22 percent. Another measure of validity is a comparison of the new experimentally derived volume factors developed with this research, to the historical data from actual landfill samples taken by The Garbage Project. When comparing five broad categories in the 6 two databases, all are within three percentage points. Given the range of accuracy in the two databases, this comparison is comforting. In addition, the comparisons of actual landfill weight percentages by broad material categories are similar for The Garbage Project samples from four different landfills, compared to Franklin Associates' calculated weight percentages which were derived independently for EPA. OA 2M g � a cr SSS � a e A AA R � Rcr ns r e ns r e s � O A g y ar � p N s r 3 6 SL F � i J or III 1-*1 1T pi stall Awll ��( Q ; S i► I Nit 71 �����i� � gl s.irrattrtt! ��� gg�� a Quart snot u.- � g scr s t Kill t B 111 «• 't s�arU1n CD =t �v,C-0maWOm CDO j CD U w n O Q m coO CD CD M3 CD , O p) 7 CD w cn 1 V, n-3 cr 0 �� O CD 3n "O—IccCAa(O<0�--0CD� CD °'rv=te CD M a' 3 c- —6m o- 3 3 WD 30 vi p0::r06Cn w �� �,'O va ow oCD0 3 "---= < M50 o<o$m0=T CD 0cn3a o m� (a w CD to _SD _ -0°,' '� o -� 0) c �'� C7m o �CD dam CLW m CD o c'-0 3 --w a3 �co � m,„� �'.� a00 c ' o m< < � 3 0 m (D w 3� �-c Qw 1 �-C 0—CD= 0 3 �u n Do m 3(cc o a? aC 3 0 cn -4 mn -0 -•,`c - w cn (� A p CD O W �n v 0 0 Cam= w cn - n w'< m e CD �r nwi`< a3i �cQ 3 CD °w�' c L� m C)_ m o� c mZ mm 3m�owna3. 0 CD w°=�cD��� 3- Cn� c1n a o.cn . O C C1; cn �N�_O= C lu CD w c � D�•0 ccnD(0 cD 3 cn o C c 3 m__c' 3 �C 0 CD CD 3 w m� cn CD Oo (D CD 3 =, (D C) n o ! o C) o cD (a 0 (D O '< 3 a (Q 7 . -OU w co cn O w opD-( NCD SDC (D O w 3 n O co C D�`n m=r69C^Cn3 CNA��0 WWn�D cn0n5'a0000 O cti CD -0C�< �oDw CD 0— M o c) cn (Dv(o7a-o cn CD m3C)00 0 -- =* C � cn DM� wO(C) �. !n 0 (D W (CD C (D Ai w (C] w CD E: -< C t 7 (n a� n' Qc Ow,ow63.c-)3 ~��3o33c0o CD 0-0 >� �o0CDw -M0cn �n 3!�ccn-co5- �tt N y c� o C r(D y jo Lo CD D C) c) Z co a D C (� 0 U) ni 3 9� c v� 4 O <D w - 0 C1 _E w 3 00 t- w cn Oc CD — O i C CT CD Cl(D OC 0 < n 0 Ll (a) 6 G CD CD CD a O Cn CD n t 2 CD cn G 7 Q v 7 (D < CD A 7 CCD City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 526, Health Services ------------------------------------------------------- The corrected Ordinance No. 526, amending Ordinance No. 409, in regards to Health Services will be presented to you prior to the City Council meeting of November 20, 1990. A apologize for it not being prepared in time for the packets to be delivered. J�) SLL/sl I IZ-1 ,,,,IELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. §26 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.06 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF 8OUTHLXXX, 28XA8, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 409, REQUIRING A FEE FOR ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A FOOD SERVICE OPERATIONJ PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A 9EVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS gERMOF; PROVIDING4 A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING; AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas has designated, by Ordinance No. 409, the Tarrant County Health Department as the City's health authority for the purpose of insuring minimum standards of environmental health and sanitation within the City's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 14 of Ordinance No. 409 provides for the fees to be charged for the issuance of permits under the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the Tarrant County Health Department desire to annually adopt the amount of the permit fees to be charged; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the Tarrant County Health Department have entered into an interlocal Contract to amend the fees set out in Ordinance No. 409. KOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLARE, TEXASt s l akoXf oodsem ord - (WIELDING, BRRRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.07 SECTION 1 That Section 14 of ordinance No. 409 be amended to read as follows: "Section 14. Permit Fees The following fees shall be charged for permits required under this ordinance until such fees are amended by minute order or resolution of the city council: (a) Food Establishments - A fee of $150.00 shall be charged for each food service and retail food establishment that engages in food preparation. (b) Tem2orary Earmit Fees - A fee of $35.00 shall be charged for a temporary health permit for any food establishment operating less than fourteen (14) days. (c) A Pee of $100.00 shall be charged annually for each retail food establishment that does not engage in food preparation. (d) The above fees shall be paid to the Tarrant County Health Department, 1800 University Drive, Fort worth, Texas. (e) Exemption from Fees - Non-profit facilities shall be required to make application for a permit hereunder, but shall be exempt from payment of the permit fee. (f) No permit or fee shall be required under this ordinance for the sale of produce by an individual on the premises upon which such produce is grown." SECTION 2 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 409 remain in full force and effect until otherwise amended. slake\feedacrv,ord •2• FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 p.02 t SECTION 9 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand oallars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SSCTZON 5 All rights and remedies of the City of southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of all ordinances regulating the operation of food service establishments which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this slakelfoodler—M -3- FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.03 , ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION b The city Secretary of the City of Southlak e is hereby directed its caption and penalty to publish the proposed ordinance or upiie out the time and place for a P together with a notice setting n (10) days s More the second reading hearing thereon at least rovid$s for the of this ordinance, and if thin ordinance P violation of imposition of any penalty, fine ox forfeiture for any then the City Secretary shall additionally any Of its provisions, er one time n the of publish this ordinance iCity newspaP ssage of this ordinance, as required by within ten days after Pa Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of southlake. SECTION 7 s ordinance sha�11 be in full Poroe and effect fit �s s Thi law, and after its passage and publication as required by ordained. DAY OF PAS.ED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 1990. Z+iAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -c- sjakeNfoodeerv.erd MELDING, BRRRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Nov 19,90 16:15 No.005 P.04 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED' EFFECTIVE: 91akeVood5em ord _5 City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-52 Zoning Change Request ZA 90-52 is a zoning change request for 4.2514 acres of land out of the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tracts 4A2, 4A4, 4A5, 4A6, and 4A11. The property is located South of West Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) approximately 500 feet East of Pearson Lane. The current zoning is Agricultural; the requested zoning is Commercial-2. The established use of the property is a day care center. The property is owned by Louis T. Muzyka. There were six (6) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there has been one (1) response: Thomas H. Fleeger, owner of Tract 4A1 to the East, was in favor of the request. On October 18, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of the C-2 zoning request. On November 6, 1990, the City Council approved (5-0) the First Reading of Ordinance No. 480-32. KPG 13- 1 021 To: Southlake City Council Date: November 13, 1990 From: Greg last Re: ZA 90-53, Plat Showing Lots 1 & 2, J.G. Allen No. 18 Addition The following comment from our r letter dated October 9, 1990 was recce mended by P & Z as pa:t- cf the r apirc".'.i c^ J:-`:.cher 18, 1990: Should these tracts be zoned cc=kercial, the City may wish to require a ccmmion access easement (3.07-E) on these lots to allow better control of driveways on F.M. 1709. In the City Council approval on November 6, 1990, the motion was to approve subject to our letter dated October 9, 1990. The above referenced item was not worded as a mandatory requirement because the ordinance states that the City "may require" a cmwon access easement. We are uncertain as to the intentions of Council concerning this requirement and would appreciate a clarification. Alternative interpretations of the Council Is approval regarding this item would be the following: 1. Approved the plat with all comments of the letter disregarding this comment, thereby approving the -plat without this requirement. 2. Approved the plat with all ccmunents of the letter to include requiring this ccmmn access easement as a condition of approval. The following exhibit shows an approximation of the intended can access easement. The applicant would have the riot to determine the exact location. CITY OF SOUT1ff-Ai E APPLICATION FOR AMENDME,yT TO ZONING MAP Application No. ZA To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. XMIE OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: -J U '-A DESCRIPTION (N=S AND BOLAS) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE REZONED: Sez ,V14 A 1 4 ( 4 ZONLNG RDQL'EST: FROM: AG To: - L This application must be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. 17 jS- 96 DATE SIGNATURE OF PERSON FILING ;MUST BE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY Before me, a votary Public, on this day personally appeared Lou1S T Mtj ZyKa known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrLunent and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 19 9� 7m, p. GANDYAS XAS ,��`/ . Exn. 33/1919d , /( ?ZrU NOTARY PUBLICY IN AND FOR TEXAS loop. r My Commission expires the Iq e day of �& , 19 91 3-3 INEST►ARR LOOP TROPHY CLUB WE.STLAKE DENTON COUNTY ii�RRANT COijlrT—y LAKE .00" KI°pE» j N... GRAPEVINE 3 IOI JONES p0. I POSSUM NKIOw f GMfE NECK ON 2REMIND LN 1a ]: ,_ It S CIANE .7: i : IN nutuM LN �: IASS M i ^INN EN TROUT u= .i . `If SLAKE _ ^ � CKAI►IE TRAIL LAKE THOUSAND OAKS F\ ~ » on- - " ! = ------ w4 IN SOUINLAKE b. w . � � � 3 .Kel�SOUTNLAKE •NABION 'AAA 1 ; ?PK. E e u - .LAKESIDE » \ ,,A,A1000 ON l ' I i Dp �`� I NALLSIIF INN , , s"EATve ITCT-» F CRESCENT NO I` NABIOB` BLUE TEAL CT : _ S SMIRLAKE ►K_w .IUONE M GE '-� I T ST LI A WOODLAND IN>r III ` S EAL�TME W I EST A+Fpi�, a »tO—LA�VFLL a N oil Ou ML I NpI 12 u� OEN- E CT jTATLON ST oe i 1� ME ST_ E ! + f MEIIAlO CI" OO^^ Ix IOIIIf 3 W w _ vfST- t CAANOLL7o. Q W� LN;'o » NIGH SCHOOL » . 1 MOCKINGtIRO LN 'IIIITru) ANT CT zi L ►RIMBOSE LN_ ,"•� '� i. �,+-'J e; «. : 5 apARLANE.K i i `' OARI�NE f PLANIAININ On, s a C u l+N6 z'1 SIE�►1'l1► .��ill-I` ; S Cr I CA►RaK cr-.=; '• . a, AA T TUNKEwEED C') ,; I= arw�l., <<CT►BEIS �� IFD,Ux on I +IyAIS►FAIN �LN + A "URD A 3 v CRIER, ( ' aW S ALICE CT �•,,,� i LMV FoRE4T LM o I JACK 0. JOHNSOIM �" I TNANAS CT t�� w wD_. ';,� WKN _ In XLA1q ST,0!_ _ELEMENTAAT �+,w '" r PANHANDLE CT ��- 6lE NIGNLANO ST_ E ��.>< 'a f IDS CANTON C71 FAWKES1:IKINGSw000 011 _ \A ." W IM %eloter e, ar I a II �� � 3� Fj� c�°Sf i1NIET`S BANE — - - ! s i� IPA► cr MEADOW �_ FLONENCE-� RO ' GLEN 1� GLEN 0 q 1 COVE ' Iar BILLSIOf Ct /fE' N IN 1= JMNSON AO I1M •`_° 1� �o l a� � a� a� 1 ;IS DISTRICT BOUA to C 1 �a IL=i iz � IOVE CLFEK} . 11 w+LOwooL • AKOLL MIDDLE SCHOOL 0 6� - CITT s �� HALL ItA = Y 1 T09 SOUTVLAKE ILVO.. E ODE II e AI PORT ►INK IPill CT.I if m CT� �1 a LtutT� � � w as 1 a NICEL GREE 000 A ' / Ey %IIIIIN a I� CONTINENTAL j31r "a. s I MENTAAT . 4sr o94%♦ ; L I97I�� ,� a ' 3 Ef I----- ! O �•3- COLLEYVILLE JONA McCAIN AO i I l . II Ne anLARFw1eo� LOVE HENRY CT �.► jl as e LODGE Isis = •t (ty aAIDS"KvO /ICFPANKNIALI w• Af�fDjf� �OLva/ SOUINLARE OIVO_ IN '►f of RAT ST _ _ OLD !RILL TUN _. i TR.60 2.62 AC TR .pC2 1.17 AC Justin's TR. 4A13 i AC Grocery Corms. -2 Harold Pipes AG .Wayne Lee TR.4A14 .BS Ac AG J A a St. Martins in Agricu T R MIA .22 TR.4A 42.99 Ac Field v TR.4A7 S.IT/ 6O l3-5 SOUTHLAKE BLVD Robert E T.H.Fleeger Travis % AG AG c► m TR.4A3 TR.4A1 1.5 Ac 2.03 AC v TR.4AS0 TR.4Al2 .74 AC 1 Ac TR . 4E !0 A[ 1-112,311ka Y" A t .1 , F pr�t CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-32 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 4.2514 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE J.G. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, TRACTS 4A2, 4A4, 4A5, 4A6, AND 4A11, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL-2 ZONING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agricultural Zoning District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise / 3r 7 producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of "�► signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: /3-Y Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 4.2514 acre tract of land out of the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tracts 4A2, 4A4, 4A5, 4A6, and 4A11, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From Agricultural Zoning District to Commercial-2 Zoning District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00). A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1990. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -n- City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-56 Zoning Change/Development Site Plan ZA 90-56 is a zoning change and development site plan approval request for 160.073 acres out of the R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255 and the J. T. Bailey Survey, Abstract No. 97 being located in the 900 to 1300-Block of West Southlake Blvd. The current zoning is Agricultural; the requested zoning is for a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. The owner of the property is the Estates of A.C. and Audrey Stone, Mary Stone Myers, Independent Executrix. The proposed owner/developer is Phillip Jobe. The applicant is The Nelson Corporation. The proposed use for this site is for single family residential and commercial development. The project is to bet known as Stone Lakes. The proposed P.U.D. allows a maximum residential density of 1.8 units per gross acre of land (284 residential dwelling units). It further proposes five (5) commercial lots to be located at the Northeast and Northwest corners of the property along W. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). There were twenty-three (23) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or. inquiries. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the zoning request and development site plan subject to the November 2, 1990 Engineer's letter with all comments except #1 on the informational comments. They asked that the applicant add "a minimum of 25-feet width of side yards adjacent to side streets on reversed frontage lots" to the P.U:D ordinance. The P & Z Commission suggested that the developer make the four (4) commercial lots at the Northwest corner one lot and provide a detailed site plan as it is developed. Mr. Jobe agreed to this as long as he could reserve the right to subdivide the area if needed. The Commission further suggested that the developer work with Arvida on the placement of Stone Lake's temporary access onto F.M. 1709. M KPG l 4 _ I CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING MAP Application No. 7-1 q) - 5 Y To be filed with the Zoning Department at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, you will be informed of the public hearing dates for both the Planning and Zoning and City Council meetings. You must be represented at all of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must acccmpany this application. :tA+ME OF APPLICIWL : ADDRESS: The Nelson Corporation 5999 Summerside Drive Craig Curry Suite 202 Vice President 6 Director of Dallas, Texas 75252 Planning DESCRIPTION (NEM AM HOL-L', S) OF PROPERTY RDQUESTED TO BE REZOM : See attached legal description. Agricultural ZONING REQUEST: 1-.RCM: "AG" District Planned Unit TO: "PUD" Development This application rmst be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200 feet of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat trap of the property showing the area requested.for rezoning is. --to be attached to this application. Before me, a Notory Public, r BE OPERTY OWNER .g Cur y, Own rs' Repres tive y appeased E CU�V Down & me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and a.clmowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 194 KATHLEEN SAWYER ! Notary Pubtic, State of Texas i ��, RY PUBLIC LN A� FOR .,, try Commission Expires 1-19 93 �`----R' My Cc mission expires the day of , 19 6 Y-Z) i THE ESTATES OF A.C. AND AUDREY STONE 1017 WILLIAM D. TATE AVE. GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 October 12, 1990 Ms. Karen Gandy Planning and Zoning Administrator CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76097 RE: Authorization to act as representative concerning the zoning, site plan and preliminary plat request on 160.07 acres located south of F.M. 1709 and being east of Peytonville Road in Southlake, Texas. Dear Ms. Gandy: I hereby authorize the Nelson Corporation to act in the behalf of the Estates of A.C. and Audrey Stone, owners of said property, in the request for zoningg, site plan and preliminary plat submittals of approximately 160 acres of land in the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255 and the J.T. Bailey Survey, Abstract No. 97. Sincerely nary stone Myereu, as Independent Executrix of the Estate of A.C. Stone, and as Attorney in Fact for Kippy Lee Myers, the Independent Executor of the Estate of Audrey Stone 14J Bile 1 � i All 711 LW TROPHY CL UB Kw V E z ONE AM = R EVINE - -- - -a W- - NON JONEI n. yi z 1 FKSUw NOLLNw � OOOSE KCII K s WAVES i � 1 &VAN Y 5 cum aTLAKE i EAWON COUNTY - -i - rNu uu : To NCO- 4RAANT COUNTY eIL LAKE _ 1�������� N■ ��� �� �� MMw I--- —M. 1 DISTRICT BOUND 'i i SOWNA w NWMrD' a- INMLLVK IN �Ca• ��` ; i rs� 1 1� \ 2 CI mia K NAI NINE s 999TVM PLO ' LIKFKNK M IIA OLLT ADN omvfLKI '^ t ANti IOFE (1M ■ ST ' NENNW 11 r to TArlOI ST $, ----- ` 0 EC i 1� �4 MAIN W 'ri CARROW iU T ; IDIF Ii_ w NICK SCHOOL 1 cum KIN IA 2 �K' 1 wTTA■ CT LA 7 anEp F — �; NNNIN[E �~ WNNIR M[f N CAWS KRUNE. N :e.. i J awrL I MATE `'Alms 1 WKCK C Y CHIN[ AY - ` iLEFM• N OW eIA TI J 2 NNLEWEEN C ' - , 2 IOUUF 71 1 s< Cyp It IINW WN 1 LINUON TR ( I ALICE CT I (� K D. JOHNSO / TWIM CT- I ELEAIENTART „d -T FANNANNIE CT J J ' �, N �• "NJ ND IT I KK CANTON C d AM FAWF EOa ONO so M RROLL i4 II0i a IOIF LIFE j s' IJ MIDDLE t 11[i0 mulnuI1RFs �� IYQ w0.NMI00 SCHOOL -rt��'F � � FLOOENCE NN JL _ ' �� M [1 FN no 11 CJNAERAK n CNYE 11IE MEANT CT �' ~ CITY A 4MAIN �LO IIIaNALL111 1 `tlYT1F 21CMurwsHIKE ■ IN TEN ►ARK +���+le• Ma a� K N IIK fOUTNIA Y 17K iWTNl11KE ILIL F » 111 at L �W� `ILI G E fNK CT. E 1 J% 1KL' 1 AIRIOdw o7 i �i •i�riiCAANOE ILK{' 1ANIOwZE a ZII El ONE NwOK a - 3 '""•NW1 YCONi�FNTEij� ••• F-i-I.C.TMENTILL ALN0. Ec CONTNIFRAL LLR w 3• C RNO RT � e'�I � Ie a. : x T '•• I COLLEYVILLE :s 1T E El t •lit . �ipt7,,tl ffr�r ft iiiii� lit 8 ��;E�:li�ttffE:�jili:�j•1..•,i t7g•�;�f(;.ii�f•ft,t,tflffftf'� a !� o o ; a N a a i x II X tL w Z _t Y: i O ..r 3 O N .... II` CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 2, 1990 Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Soithlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-56: First Review of the P.U.D. Development Site Plan for Stone Lakes Addition our staff has reviewed the above mentioned development plan received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we offer the following scam ents: 1. The chord bearing of the first curve in the legal description does not mate the boundary. 2. The ccxmnercial zoning for Southridge should be labeled 'C-31. The Black Tract, Alexander Tract, and the Wayland Tract should be labeled 'AG'. 3. Existing easements on or adjacent to the site should be shown. (i.e. the existing SS Easement and Timberlake Easements.) The following ccatm mits are not required in Ordinance No. 480 relating to Development Site Plans; however, we have provided the following suggestions for the City to consider in their review of the Development Site Plan. *1 Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03-I allows a maximum of 20 lots on a cul-de-sac. There are 33 lots accessing from one point of entry on Cambridge Crossing. We would reooatmend a street stub west from Brighton Place. *2 Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01-C allows Council to require a second point of access be constructed in some situations. There are 280 lots accessing from one point of entry on Stone Lakes Place. We would reccbnzen i a second temporary point of access be provided to F.M. 1709 in the vicinity of Lot 13, Block 1. *3 We would recamnend that this plan show number of units, density, total acreage and open space for both phases of the development and as a total. * With approval of a Level 'D' bufferyard along F.M. 1709 per the requirements of Table 3, we are considering F.M. 1709 an "Arterial" rather than an "Expressway" . ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Sourl-• `--wing and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • 4, 7 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1022 540-4329 Karen Gandy City of Southlake November 2, 1990 Page 2 * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Ccx=il must be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, POP, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. Va19MAW * Denotes informational comment cc: Nelson Corporation 14 4 - ao�mooaaoc+A► i Y i .n,y.,r,,.<� i ...w. r. ....,...,...,.. I ....�.... ,1 � ...,.,, �..,...w, .. - ; ..G.......... I -1111C- .rL rsr-a .� . _ wI1I r.� 'rvwM EA ca ROM An SWIM w W �. JL- •_ ..s \ J ^... ,n f \ Two ` ` g ......... r. r er..•wrn.arr...:.w ZONED .G _ : 4804 uD , .so -or VOTES: J t r. ww.•. w. r t..r • r r...« rw.w w �.,... M..R •- ._ r w .�•..• w..rr,...r w rt.w r.rw�s.r j 1 w�wrw ww+.r.rN r....rr. rrw.. w. wirwrr.rr rrr.. I � -� rM. M •}r. Y.Y q • Y r..Yp.r1 ra • w.lffl4 T�.�1 rw. 1� .� a P.. l.n a• rrt M •...r.r. r...r f�1 V . r...rww. rr a.• r... n.... IrNw Nr . YNa .✓w r...q1. dN rY .,. •....w...w.w..rrw r..Yo..r�.w.w... w. DEVELOPMENT SI TE PLAN r cr..a.. r...Y. oA wr..�..•wwrw. nrtra wr..arr rw.rrwn STONE LAKES ••••.+•..•+•.r..++wr+...••w..r.....r.........� PHASE ONE i PHASE TWO . •ou .w i.i � i ..N.. •. •. n....n.n .o uu Em" tarp d osfta m AG Awodlvar AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE r.000s.d so..p L•i.w6uW.a vW' Mra Df•.bgrr.r TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS t �♦ SG%CORP RAT Dr tea. Oa. ELOR1r 7 THa%Easo+cowroa�raN miLurJIosE N VM.Nq r.. L N1T iw .f 9Y r IIN. [. I.w it..... •Y CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 15, 1990 Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-56: Second Review of the P.U.D. Development Site Plan for Stone Lakes Addition Dear Karen: Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned development plan received by our office on November 13, 1990 and we find the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous letter: The following comments are not required in ordinance No. 480 relating to Development Site Plans; however, we have provided the following suggestions for the City to consider in their review of the Development Site Plan. *1 Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03-I recommends a maximums of 20 lots on a cul-de-sac. There are 33 lots accessing from one point of entry on Cambridge Crossing. We would recommend a street stub west from Brighton Place. *2 Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01-C allows Council to require a second point of access be constructed in some situations. There are 280 lots accessing from one point of entry on Stone lakes Place. We would recommend a second temporary point of access be provided to F.M. 1709 in the vicinity of Lot 13, Block 1 until the second access to the south was constructed. *3 We would recommend that this plan show number of units, density, total acreage and open space for each phase of the development. * With approval of a Level 'D' bu.fferyaxd along F.M. 1709 per the requirements of Table 3, we are considering F.M. 1709 an "Arterial" rather than an "Expressway". If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, ff Eddie Cheatham, P.E. W9066W * Denotes informational comment cc: Nelson Corporation ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Sc anning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West 14 -/6 7 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-10-- .... o 640-4329 r • • r• I � I mn a a•n �'! •uwf a .•cn.wm ay.m _ .n ZONED CJ' AL ZDNMD ZONED —77 AOrY hr _ . wir . ><iu � �as� a -.n;o - cui.r_ _ - • .,,,,,.• o"""".,, a'j' oZONEC to ir__� 'rrr a v a 1 ZONED AC. caff-l—ad \ �• / SAG ZONED -Lo pub .8D-M r ._ MOTES:"40 I. t Tw wwri• ire b M1 rI r b r.fr bw �•r1r w a..�rr r.r�r iV `� �� 2l+✓s�../ wSr ww .rrr. rw• w ri w�Yn•r lbwn � w ti row r /r /w�ra �� w w ••leer b ae.laww S Iwrirb rwwe ewc. r rw Y bw rro.. (w f w w raww w•ria w �• ✓w� a M r � bfeq r.b.4c•r w iY we l M w�• wr ww r ery Pfl r•r1 •f•4i •w. � S e1r. tw Ow fw ww • bw. •w. r ww �l � M ae•• isr•w• Inr •rn rrau a rm 4elf� M. .rw.rw r.••w1�• W w ..� `a••`w��`�r`rw °"r•r"°"'"`�"" DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN r.owu.r�r rr�o. www r.�wrr w. nri rra .v.w..r..�...a.w...r.,..w...rr.�... w.r r •o.rurr• w r w r ,« DATASUMMAW STONE LAKES •••+r..r....+�..tibrb..o....rwm.......rx�a TOMKm4 /E0.073w- PHASE ONE & PHASE TWO o ar rw wbr�ew rrerera>w.sr w,wwrb�wrrw w� rw» •cen orn w ,.. Total ft ON uFft ?DO milt u. nrf•e�wir,.eir.cr w.rm rra •.r. unar sr:wo..ran.cr .o. •w n 4w s•rrfwww.+r•.rwr.n.Mwrw. wf•rrwrSeMa•wr.► ��w"a""'•"•"°'r"�"""�"�" .ws � "w""•'•"�" R *Kisnt dDo tatWom es AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOITHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Eiietig zwwV chmWftedarc'AG Ag=Wtweh Opw spece 17.0 ec MAY) flAla &Kr4GUVLLR m OW ER/Un7tLufn THE NELSON CORPORATION PHILLlP JOKE Ropowd rOrog clM*MftMbm WA' Phoned hAil Dsieloprrwd Comneiri S4 m .w.rw•n.n arvcaurre: .w o•u.s w.•r.nmr `If OcTOm n ww STONE LAKES A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMF VT in SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS OW NER/DEVEGOPER: PHILLIP JOBE 16980 Dallas Parkway, Suite 204 Dallas, Texas 75248 PLANNING & ZONING: THE NELSON CORPORATION Land Planning w Engineering w Surveying Construction Management 5999 Summerside Drive Dallas, Texas 75252 (214) 380-2605 4-13 RITRODUCTION: This proposal by Phillip Jobe requests zoning for a Planned Unit Development District on approximately 160 acres of land, hereinafter known as Stone Lakes. In large, Stone Lakes is intended to provide a residential community where creative and aesthetically desirable design concepts use the unique environmental features and natural amenities characteristic of this site. The plan, as developed under the guidelines of the Southlake Planned Unit Development District, will allow for an appreciable amount of open space. The enhancement of environmentally significant natural features are Incorporated into the community as neighborhood park and recreational areas. EXISTING LAND USES AND ZONING: ■ Adjacent land uses are primarily agricultural to the south and west. There are, -however, single-family developments north and east of the site. ■ Commercial/retail zoning exists at the northwest corner of the subject property. ■ The Carroll Independent School District recently purchased property along a portion of the western boundary of the subject property. This land purchase was made to accommodate the future development of a high school and related facilities. ■ The existing land use for the subject property is ' agricultural In nature. ■ The subject tract is currently zoned "AG" Agricultural District. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING: ■ The City of Southlake's Land Use Plan shows all areas of the subject property as Medium Density Residential. ■ The proposed zoning is for a "PUD" Planned Unit Development District as set forth in Section 30 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 480. ■ The proposed land use for the subject property is for single family, detached residential units and commercial tracts at the northwest and northeast corners of the site fronting on F.M. 1709. ■ The proposed Planned Unit Development allows a maximum residential density of 1.8 units per gross acre of land or 284 residential dwelling units. 1 NC90062/ZONING I4_lI SITE ANALYSIS: The proposed development site Is located in an area bounded by F.M. 1709 on the north, being west of the Timber Lake Planned Unit Development and east of Peytonville Road. The area of request is located within the Southlake City Limits and contains approximately 160 acres of land. The site possesses unique topographical and natural features which will, in large, be preserved and enhanced for the residents of the community. A variety of natural resources and land forms currently exist on this property. Several tree covered knolls occupy the central and western portions of the property. The southwest and eastern portions of the property are transversed by distinctive waterways with wooded embankments. There is an existing lake on the property, being approximately eight acres in surface area. Development has been planned throughout the site with care and attention to preservation of as many mature trees and natural features as possible. A unique opportunity to create a residential community with a countryside ambiance exists. Careful planning will assure preservation of these natural amenities. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT: The residential land uses proposed in the Planned Unit Development are Intended to meet the quality and attractiveness sought by Home Buyers in the growing community of Southlake. An appreciation for the unique topography, picturesque landscape and countryside environment, coupled with a concern for the existing land uses, has determined the overall design concept and land uses proposed. Open space areas are intended to provide an appreciable amount of usable open space, allowing easy access for all residents by way of planned residential roadways. A trail system will be integrated to further the "park -like" atmosphere around the lake area of the community. Design flexibility is of particular importance for the project. Rigid performance to traditional subdivision and zoning regulation will not allow for site sensitivity necessary to protect critical areas of natural amenity or to harmoniously develop areas on this unique parcel. This Planned Unit Development is proposed to provide prime residential, recreational and commercial uses within the City of Southlake. A Planned Unit Development designation, with standards as outlined in this text, will allow the developer the ability to provide an opportunity for quality housing, recreational and open space amenities and supportive commercial uses, within the proposed Stone Lakes addition. 2 NC90062/ZONING 14-15 Development of the Stone Lakes property, described in Exhibit "A", consisting of approximately 160.07 acres of land, shall be in accordance with the following Development Standards: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - SINGLE FAMILY: 1. Use Regulations: In the development of the residential portion of the Planned Unit Development, no land shall be used and no building shall be installed, erected for or constructed to any use other than as hereinafter provided: a. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted: I. Single family, detached dwellings as outlined herein. If. - Recreation and open space amenities including parks, playgrounds, clubhouses, gazebos, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, swimming pools, pedestrian and bicycle paths and other similar uses. III. Schools - public, private or state accredited. iv. Churches and rectories. V. FIre stations and public safety facilities. vi. Real Estate sales offices/model homes during the development and marketing of the residential areas. vii. Utility distribution lines and facilities. viii. Electronic security facilities. ix. Temporary buildings and uses incidental to construction ' work on the premises, which shall be removed upon completion or abandonment of construction work. X. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the permitted uses. xi. Uses similar to the above mentioned permitted uses. b. Special Exception Uses: Special exception uses may be approved by the Southlake Board of Adjustment as specifically authorized In the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, No. 480, Section 44, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 44, together with such other conditions as the Board of Adjustment may impose. Any use accessory to an approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies within the conditions for an accessory use as defined herein. 2. Development Regulations: The following development regulations shall be applicable to residential development: . a. Height: No building or structure shall exceed two and one-half (23) stories, nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet. 3 NC90062/ZONING 14-1� b. Depth of Front Yard: There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than thirty (30) feet. C. Depth of Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. d. Width of Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet. e. Width of Side Yard Adjacent to Side Street: A side yard adjacent to a street shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet. f. Lot Width: The width of each lot shall not be less than one -hundred (100) feet, measured at midpoints of the side lot lines. g. Lot Depth: The depth of the lot shall not be less than one hundred twenty (120) feet measured at the midpoint of the frontage. h. Lot Size: Lots for any permitted use shall have a minimum area of twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. i. Maximum Lot Coverage: The combined area of all buildings shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the total lot area. Swimming pools, spas, decks, patios, driveways, walks and other paved areas shall not be included in determining maximum building coverage. J. Floor Area: The main residence shall contain a minimum of one thousand eight hundred (1,800) square feet of floor area. - k. Maximum Residential Density: The maximum number of allowed dwelling units shall be 1.8 units per gross acre (154.7 gross acres) or a total of 284 allowed dwelling units. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL: In the development of the commercial portion of the Planned Unit Development, no land shall be used and no building shall be Installed, erected for or constructed to any permitted use other than those set forth in Section 21 of the City of Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 480, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial DIstrict. Development Regulations shall also apply as per section 21 as well as all other relative issues including off-street parking and loading, screening and bufferyards. 4 NC90062/ZONING 14-1-1 rROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES: A Property Owners' Association will be established for any area that requires maintenance of private, common elements. The purpose of the Association will be to enhance and protect the value and attractiveness of the commonly owned, private property within the Planned Unit Development. The Association will not be formed for the purpose of financial gain but rather for the purpose of control over the development and maintenance of such private land and facilities which are intended to be owned in common. The Association will have the power to levy assessments for the construction, maintenance and operation of all common elements of the development. Assessments through the Property Owners' Association will contribute to the cost of maintenance of common area items such as, but not limited to, the following: trail systems and walkways, landscaping, signage, outdoor lighting and private park areas. Every person or entity who is a record owner of a housing unit within any area where a Property Owners' Association is deemed necessary shall become a member of the Association. Homeowners will be responsible for maintenance of their own dwelling unit and the lot upon which that unit is sited. All commonly owned, private open space within any development area will be maintained by a Property Owners' Association. 5 NC90062/ZONING EXHIBIT "A" STONE LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 160.073 ACRES BEING a tract or parcel of land out of the R. J. PADEN SURVEY, Abstract No. 1255 and the J. T. BAILEY SURVEY, Abstract No. 97, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract conveyed by deed recorded in Volume 4153, Page 557, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709 as conveyed to the State of Texas, a 1.491 acre tract, by deed recorded in Volume 9962, Page 2187, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being South 00" 43' 50" West, 50.00 feet, North 89° 32' 00" East, 1549.81 feet, and South 00° 06' 00" West, 28.06 feet from the northwest corner of said R. J. Paden Survey; THENCE along the said south right-of-way line, North 89° 34' 58" East, a distance of 193.53 feet to an iron rod; THENCE continuing along the south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709, North 89° 35' 02" East, a distance of 472.70 feet to an iron rod for the beginning of a tangency curve to the right having a central angle of 01° 52' 59", a radius of 11,394.16 and a chord and bearing and distance of South 89° 28' 29" East, 374.46 feet; THENCE continuing along the said south right-of-way and the said curve, an arc distance of 374.47 feet to an iron rod; THENCE continuing along the said south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709, South 88° 31' 59" East, a distance of 1252.61 feet to an iron rod for the southeast corner of the 1.491 acre tract conveyed to the State of Texas; THENCE South 000 33' 00" East, a distance of 357.40 feet to an iron rod for the southwest corner of the 1.9 acre tract conveyed by deed recorded in Volume 6202, Page 72, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE along the south line of the said 1.9 acre tract, South 88' 29' 30" East, a distance of 216.64 feet to an iron rod in the west line of the 240.99 acre tract conveyed by deeds recorded in Volume 9719, Page 603, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas for the southeast corner of the 1.9 acre tract; THENCE along a west line of said tract, South 000 17' 20" East, a distance of 2252.39 feet to an old iron rod for an ell corner of the said 240.99 acre tract; THENCE along the north line of the 240.99 acre tract, North 89° 38' 00" West, a distance of 1359.97 feet to an old iron rod; THENCE North, a distance of 34.13 feet to an old iron rod at the northeast corner of a tract as recorded in Volume 5822, Page 328, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89° 38' 00" West, a distance of 1399.32 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 17' 00" West, a distance of 1222.72 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 47' 05" East, a distance of 762.15 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 89` 39' 00" East, a distance of 229.82 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 06' 00" East, a distance of 608.13 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 160.073 acres of land or 6,972.783 square feet of land. This legal description was complied from a survey prepared by Tho 19 _19 'hompson, R.P.L.S. #1237. STONE LAKES DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: It is anticipated that the development of Stone Lakes will begin in 1991. During the time period prior to initial stages of development, it is foreseen that studies, plans and plats will be prepared for development and marketing of the property. At present, it is foreseen that the initial phase of development will most likely occur in the north and west portions of this Planned Unit Development. This is the area adjacent to the southern most right-of-way of F.M. 1709. It is anticipated that project completion of the initial phase, excluding total construction of all structures, should occur by the end of 1991. It is anticipated that the development of Stone Lakes, excluding total construction of all structures, will be completed within approximately four (4) years of zoning approval. Progress of development improvements, as noted above, will primarily depend on market trends/demands for the area and time frames established for construction of major thoroughfares in the City of Southlake. Due to the - unknown characteristics of the future housing market, the above noted schedule and time frames are subject to change. NC90062/DEV.SCH N —Zo STONE LAKES A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT in SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS OWAERIDEVELOPER: PHILLIP JOBE 16980 Dallas Parkway, Suite 204 Dallas, Texas 75248 PLANNING & ZONING: THE NELSON CORPORATION Land Planning a Engineering . Surveying Construction Management 5999 Summerside Drive Dallas, Texas 75252 (214) 380-2605 14-13 INTRODUCTION: This proposal by Phillip Jobe requests zoning for a Planned Unit Development District on approximately 160 acres of land, hereinafter known as Stone Lakes. In large, Stone Lakes is intended to provide a residential community where creative and aesthetically desirable design concepts use the unique environmental features and natural amenities characteristic of this site. The plan, as developed under the guidelines of the Southlake Planned Unit Development District, will allow for an appreciable amount of open space. The enhancement of environmentally significant natural features are Incorporated into the community as neighborhood park and recreational areas. EXISTING LAND USES AND ZONING: ■ Adjacent land uses are primarily agricultural to the south and west. There are, -however, single-family developments north and east of the site. ■ Commercial/retail zoning exists at the northwest corner of the subject property. ■ The Carroll Independent School District recently purchased property along a portion of the western boundary of the subject property. This land purchase was made to accommodate the future development of a high school and related facilities. ■ The existing land use for the subject property is ' agricultural in nature. ■ The subject tract is currently zoned "AG" Agricultural District. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING: ■ The City of Southlake's Land Use Plan shows all areas of the subject property as Medium Density Residential. ■ The proposed zoning is for a "PUD" Planned Unit Development District as set forth in Section 30 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 480. ■ The proposed land use for the subject property is for single family, detached residential units and commercial tracts at the northwest and northeast corners of the site fronting on F.M. 1709. ■ The proposed Planned Unit Development allows a maximum residential density of 1.8 units per gross acre of land or 284 residential dwelling units. 1 NC90062/ZONING 14 - If ,rrE ANALYSIS: The proposed development site is located in an area bounded by F.M. 1709 on the north, being west of the Timber Lake Planned Unit Development and east of Peytonville Road. The area of request is located within the Southlake City Limits and contains approximately 160 acres of land. The site possesses unique topographical and natural features which will, In large, be preserved and enhanced for the residents of the community. A variety of natural resources and land forms currently exist on this property. Several tree covered knolls occupy the central and western portions of the property. The southwest and eastern portions of the property are transversed by distinctive waterways with wooded embankments. There is an existing lake on the property, being approximately eight acres in surface area. Development has been planned throughout the site with care and attention to preservation of as many mature trees and natural features as possible. A unique opportunity to create a residential community with a countryside ambiance exists. Careful planning will assure preservation of these natural amenities. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT: low The residential land uses proposed in the Planned Unit Development are Intended to meet the quality and attractiveness sought by Home Buyers in the growing community of Southlake. An appreciation for the unique topography, picturesque landscape and countryside environment, coupled with a concern for the existing land uses, has determined the overall design concept and land uses proposed. Open space areas are intended to provide an appreciable amount of usable open space, allowing easy access for all residents by way of planned residential roadways. A trail system will be integrated to further the "park -like" atmosphere around the lake area of the community. Design flexibility is of particular importance for the project. Rigid performance to traditional subdivision and zoning regulation will not allow for site sensitivity necessary to protect critical areas of natural amenity or to harmoniously develop areas on this unique parcel. This Planned Unit Development is proposed to provide prime residential, recreational and commercial uses within the City of Southlake. A Planned Unit Development designation, with standards as outlined in this text, will allow the developer the ability to provide an opportunity for quality housing, recreational and open space amenities and supportive commercial uses, within the proposed Stone Lakes addition. 2 NC90062/ZONING W )5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Development of the Stone Lakes property, described in Exhibit "A", consisting of approximately 160.07 acres of land, shall be in accordance with the following Development Standards: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - SINGLE FAMILY: 1. Use Reaulations: In the development of the residential portion of the Planned Unit Development, no land shall be used and no building shall be installed, erected for or constructed to any use other than as hereinafter provided: a. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted: I. Single family, detached dwellings as outlined herein. ii. - Recreation and open space amenities including parks, playgrounds, clubhouses, gazebos, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, swimming pools, pedestrian and bicycle paths and other similar uses. _ Ill. Schools - public, private or state accredited. iv. Churches and rectories. V. Fire stations and public safety facilities. vi. Real Estate sales offices/model homes during the development and marketing of the residential areas. vii. Utility distribution lines and facilities. viii. Electronic security facilities. ix. Temporary buildings and uses incidental to construction work on the premises, which shall be removed upon completion or abandonment of construction work. X. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the permitted uses. xi. Uses similar to the above mentioned permitted uses. b. Special Exception Uses: Special exception uses may be approved by the Southlake Board of Adjustment as specifically authorized in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, No. 480, Section 44, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 44, together with such other conditions as the Board of Adjustment may impose. Any use accessory to an. approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies within the conditions for an accessory use as defined herein. 2. Development Rexulations: The following development regulations shall be applicable to residential development: . a. Height: No building or structure shall exceed two and one-half (23) stories, nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet. 3 NC90062/ZONING 14-1t f b. Depth of Front Yard: There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than thirty (30) feet. C. Depth of Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. d. Width of Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet. e. Width of Side Yard Adjacent to Side Street: A side yard adjacent to a street shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet. f. Lot WIdth: The width of each lot shall not be less than one -hundred (100) feet, measured at midpoints of the side lot lines. g. Lot Depth: The depth of the lot shall not be less than one hundred twenty (120) feet measured at the midpoint of the frontage. h. Lot Size: Lots for any permitted use shall have a minimum area of twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. I. Maximum Lot Coverage: The combined area of all buildings shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the total lot area. Swimming pools, spas, decks, patios, driveways, walks and other paved areas shall not be included in determining maximum building coverage. J. Floor Area: The main residence shall contain a minimum of one thousand eight hundred (1,800) square feet of floor area. k. Maximum Residential Density: The maximum number of allowed dwelling units shall be 1.8 units per gross acre (154.7 gross acres) or a total of 284 allowed dwelling units. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL: NC90062/ZONING In the development of the commercial portion of the Planned Unit Development, no land shall be used and no building shall be installed, erected for or constructed to any permitted use other than those set forth in Section 21 of the City of Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 480, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Development Regulations shall also apply as per section 21 as well as all other relative issues including off-street parking and loading, screening and bufferyards. 4 14-1-1 MOPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES: A Property Owners' Association will be established for any area that requires maintenance of private, common elements. The purpose of the Association will be to enhance and protect the value and attractiveness of the commonly owned, private property within the Planned Unit Development. The Association will not be formed for the purpose of financial gain but rather for the purpose of control over the development and maintenance of such private land and facilities which are intended to be owned in common. The Association will have the power to levy assessments for the construction, maintenance and operation of all common elements of the development. Assessments through the Property Owners' Association will contribute to the cost of maintenance of common area items such as, but not limited to, the following: trail systems and walkways, landscaping, signage, outdoor lighting and private park areas. Every person or entity who is a record owner of a housing unit within any area where a Property Owners' Association is deemed necessary shall become a member of the Association. Homeowners will be responsible for maintenance of their own dwelling unit and the lot upon which that unit is sited. All commonly owned, private open space within any development area will be maintained by a Property Owners' Association. 5 NC90062/ZONING EXHIBIT "A" STONE LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 160.073 ACRES BEING a tract or parcel of land out of the R. J. PADEN SURVEY, Abstract No. 1255 and the J. T. BAILEY SURVEY, Abstract No. 97, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract conveyed by deed recorded in Volume 4153, Page 557, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709 as conveyed to the State of Texas, a 1.491 acre tract, by deed recorded in Volume 9962, Page 2187, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being South 000 43' 50" West, 50.00 feet, North 89° 32' 00" East, 1549.81 feet, and South 00° 06' 00" West, 28.06 feet from the northwest corner of said R. J. Paden Survey; THENCE along the said south right-of-way line, North 89° 34' 58" East, a distance of 193.53 feet to an iron rod; THENCE continuing along the south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709, North 89' 35' 02" East, a distance of 472.70 feet to an iron rod for the beginning of a tangency curve to the right having a central angle of 01° 52' 59", a radius of 11,394.16 and a chord and bearing and distance of South 89' 28' 29" East, 374.46 feet; THENCE continuing along the said south right-of-way and the said curve, an arc distance of 374.47 feet to an iron rod; THENCE continuing along the said south right-of-way line of Farm Market Highway 1709, South 880 31' 59" East, a distance of 1252.61 feet to an iron rod for the southeast corner of the 1.491 acre tract conveyed to the State of Texas; THENCE South 00° 33' 00" East, a distance of 357.40 feet to an iron rod for the southwest corner of the 1.9 acre tract conveyed by deed recorded in Volume 6202, Page 72, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE along the south line of the said 1.9 acre tract, South 88° 29' 30" East, a distance of 216.64 feet to an iron rod in the west line of the 240.99 acre tract conveyed by deeds recorded in Volume 9719, Page 603, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas for the southeast corner of the 1.9 acre tract; THENCE along a west line of said tract, South 00° 17' 20" East_, a distance of 2252.39 feet to an old iron rod for an ell corner of the said 240.99 acre tract; THENCE along the north line of the 240.99 acre tract, North 89° 38' 00" West, a distance of 1359.97 feet to an old iron rod; THENCE North, a distance of 34.13 feet to an old iron rod at the northeast corner of a tract as recorded in Volume 5822, Page 328, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89° 38' 00" West, a distance of 1399.32 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 17' 00" West, a distance of 1222.72 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 47' 05" East, a distance of 762.15 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 89* 39' 00" East, a distance of 229.82 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00° 06' 00" East, a distance of 608.13 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 160.073 acres of land or 6,972.783 square feet of land. This legal description was complied from a survey prepared by Thy 14 q q 'hompson, R.P.L.S. # 1237. STONE LAKES DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: It is anticipated that the development of Stone Lakes will begin in 1991. During the time period prior to initial stages of development, it is foreseen that studies, plans and plats will be prepared for development and marketing of the property. At present, it is foreseen that the initial phase of development will most likely occur in the north and west portions of this Planned Unit Development. This is the area adjacent to the southern most right-of-way of F.M. 1709. It is anticipated that project completion of the initial phase, excluding total construction of all structures, should occur by the end of 1991. It is anticipated that the development of Stone Lakes, excluding total construction of all structures, will be completed within approximately four (4) years of zoning approval. Progress of development improvements, as noted above, will primarily depend on market trends/demands for the area and time frames established for construction of major thoroughfares in the City of Southlake. Due to the unknown characteristics of the future housing market, the above noted schedule and time frames are subject to change. NC90062/DEV.SCH 4 —2o CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-33 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 160.073 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE R.J. PADEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1255, AND THE J.T. BAILEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 97, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise lq-zl ki producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public: health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public. necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the c:lassific:ati.on which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: - 2- /5:--X A Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day [ of September, 1989, as. originally adopted and amended, is hereby (r amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 160.073 acre tract of land out of the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and the J.T. Bailey Survey, Abstract No. 97, as more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From Agricultural Zoning District to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other_ respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. (W Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall. be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. -3- l7 0?3 Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00). A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. PASSED AND APPROVED on, the 1st reading the 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: day of CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1990. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -4- N-A f) City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-57 Preliminary Plat of Stone Lakes --------------------------------------------------- ZA 90-57 is the Preliminary Plat of Stone Lakes, 160.073 acres out of the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255 and the J.T. Bailey Survey, Abstract No. 97. The property is located in the 900 to 1300-Block of West Southlake Blvd. -(FM 1709). It is surrounded by Timber Lake addition on the East and Southeast and the Carroll High School site on the West. The current zoning is Agricultural, the requested zoning is Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. The owner of the property is the Estates of A.C. and Audrey Stone, Mary Stone Myers, Independent Executrix. The proposed owner/developer is Phillip Jobe. The applicant is The Nelson Corporation. The developer proposes a two-phase development. Phase One proposes 143 single family lots, four (4) commercial lots, and two (2) open space lots. Phase Two proposes 137 single family residential lots, one (1) commercial lot, and two (2) open space lots. The anticipated start of Phase One construction is Spring, 1991. There were twenty-three (23) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries regarding this plat. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and -Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the Preliminary Plat subject to the City Engineer's letter dated November 2, 1990, omitting item #13. The developer agreed to make the side yards on reversed frontage lots twenty-five (251) feet. KPG 15-1 C I TY OF Svc I'f-MAP1? PPL.IMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TITLE OF PLAT: STONE LAKES 1-12-29 SUEMITTAL DEADLINE: October 15, 1990 144, yG - 167 APPLICANT tvmmE: The Nelson Corporation TCTAL 1.01'S: 289 TOTAL A=: 160.073 Ck:TZI1 (if not applicant) ADDRESS: 5999 Summerside Dr. , Suite 202 Dallas, Texas 75252 pEcvE: (214) 380-2605 Mr. Phillip Jobe 16980 Dallas Parkway. #204 Dallas, Texas 75248 (214) 931-7231 I hereby per-~' ; `y that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivisicr. Crdinances No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, gaps and codes of the City of Southlake that per a; n to this submittal. I fume- understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zcni.r:g Commission and City Council mee �s to r� esent the enclosed recurz- and address any unresolved issues. Craig �y, V' President S Director of Planning Signed: Date: October 15. 1990 «** Cit, _y: e-re✓y acknowledge rec..eipt of the prelimina-- plat acplicaticn and the application fee * the amount of $ a 151 _ �` on this the 15• day of L-Ctct',V , 19 1G Signed: Likn, f,PAItif Title: The following checklist is a partial sun iary of platting required by the City of Scuthlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Crdinance No. 160-A and No. 217, the Zcni* g Crdinance No. 334 and et^.e_- ordinances, rra_ s and codes available at the City Hall that tray pertain to this plat submittal. Shown on Nct GENSZAL IN:'CRMATICU Plan ADolic. X Acce?table scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100', 1" = 200' X North arrow, Graphic b �.ritten scale in close proximity _x_ Vicinity Map x Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of..." _x_ Title includes City, County, State and survey name Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record caner b subdivide_- (if different) Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Y_ Standard approval block provided AWNCEP."T PROPERTY (within 200' ) x Unplatted property: Name of record owner wit, vol. b page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name b plat record vol. & page. x Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property -x_ Existing easements adjacent to this property (dashed) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats _- Adjacent street intersections shown Sheet 1 of 2 Checklist cant. Is-?- Preliminary Plat Shown C� kllut Cont. on Not S. c 2 of 2 G IU AL SITE INFO. ,TION 1-18-89 Plan Applic. X Lecal description of the land to include: Narne of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USES monument, total acreage. X Point of Beginning labeled on plat X Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description X Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and di ensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. X Show existing traveled roadway widths X_ General outline of area embraced by tree cover X All existing easements shown X Existing structures shown (Note whether to regain or not) PROPOSED RTORMATICN X Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted shoring a 7.5' U.E., provide a 7.5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent propexty is platted and shows no easement,. provide a 15' U.E. along the interior of the property line X Street alignment in accordance with ordinance no. 217 X Cuzvilirear ordinance No. 443 criteria met -g_ Street_ R.O.W. dimensioned X Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property X Street names provided not similar to any existing street names X R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan sham and dimensioned X_ Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order X Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned X Frcnt building setback lines labeled or noted X 50' setback line shorn on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 X Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, floods plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions X Parcels reserved for private use shown as descibed above X Any proposed zoning labeled as such X Sc::erule addressing phasing of development with estimated beginning acid comleticn data for each phase X n'-*:titative land use schedule provided ,X Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc. X_ Approximate flood plain and floodway limits shown. Not Included Included PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS X Preliminary water layout showing all existing lines (with sizes) adjacent to the property and all proposed lines X Preliminary sewer layout X Conceptual drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances 217 and 160-A to include the following: -"dater impoundments shown (lakes, ponds, stock tanks, etc.) -Drainage structures shown, i.e., dams, spillways, flumes, culverts, etc., and noted as to size and t},pe thereof, i.e. earth, concrete, riprap, metal, RCP, VCP, etc. -Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e., stream creeks, swales, etc_ -Iccation, type and size of critical downstream drainage structures irr3acted by this development -Delineation of on and continguous off -site drainage areas including acreages and '0' calculations thereof 153 CHEATHAM AND ,, ASSOCIATES Nov-mlDer 2, 1990 Karen Gandy . Zoning for City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Sauthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-57: First Review of the Preliminary Plat of Stone lakes our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we offer the following ccrosnents: 1. The labeling of surrounding properties within 200 ft. has the following deficiencies: - - Several tracts do not have warranty deed records shcwn. - Label the plat records for Ginger Creek Estates, Southridge lakes and Timberlake, also show lot and block designations for platted lots. - Peytonville Road should be labeled Southridge lakes Parkway. Also label Ginger Court. - label the preliminary plat of Timberlake Pbase 3 south of this property. - The vial zoning for Southridge should be labeled 'C-31. - the Black Tract, the Alexander Tract and the Wayland Tract should be labeled 'AG'. 2. label the existing zoning on this tract. 3. The chord bearing of first curve in the legal description does not match the boundary. 4. label the existing R.O.W. width for F.M. 1709. 5. Provide a note as to whether existing structures are to remain or be removed. 6. Provide a minimum 5 ft. U.E. along the east property line. Also please label width of all intended easements along the perimeter. The 10 ft. U.E. along F.M. 1709 should continue through lot 1, Block 14. 7. A new street name is needed to replace Victoria. Also the loop streets Stone lakes Drive and Waterford will have to be divided into more street names. Please meet with the fire chief to resolve this issue. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Soutl- — iing and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West - : 154 Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 40-4329 0 Ms. Karen Gandy City of Southlake November 2, 1990 Page 2 8. Dimension the R.O.W. width on the main entrance. Also label widths on all other R.O.W. or provide a note stating all R.O.W. is 50 ft. in width unless otherwise noted. 9. We would reoaumend a second temporary point of access be constructed in the vicinity of Iat 13, Block 1 until such time as the second access to the south was constructed. 10. Lot dimensions are needed on the four cammercial lots. 11. lot and Block designations should be oontirmus regardless of the phasing, intended use or zoning of the tract. Please call to verify how this can be accomplished. 12. Me preliminary water, sewer and drainage plan shows the need for the following changes: . - Add a 15 ft. U.E. along west line of Lot 1, Block 5. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. in the northwest corner of Lot 24, Block 5. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. between Ints 30 and 31, Block S. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. between Lots 31 and 32, Block 5. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. between Lcts 28 and 29, Block 1. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. along the south line of Lots 1-4, Block 13. - Add a 15 ft. U.E. wherever the water line will be stubbed face Cambridge Crossing. 13. We rreccumend a street stub west in the vicinity of Brighton Place in the southwest corner of this tract. * The aVplicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council mast be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, jcex- Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \za19M7.Fpl * Denotes informational ccmnent cc: Nelson Corporation 15S .................1 i j i .n :........,... ....� ... , .......uu.... .».•= ....ii ....... _ r Yarw .,•�� ..... ...u.wma` .... WNW ca.ftEad4illcu► ' ID1ID fr-zoa I �- ` aa>I�m *..r • - I •• mown aQ ------- �---i-------- Iron7K --- - -- (' --- ---- ------ -- eaas [ _ I J . PaPAL m lm lts.na.[ MwP. i - _ - .r i.-io'a_ wMY [anD- _ _ 7 C —ii a 1.r � `/ �t 't 11 •i� � • •" �`t')� '\ u \'2. - umDw M ♦ • "L S• , as '•.i as t :a �} -p=- 1 ._y'�,• 'F♦ ,,till z7 i >< �`i-' !. y s•.�/•/ ti•,,�� !- : -IV t-�ti'''_�1/.ti•.' P4. a Nt a �/ „ Y'. 1` \ T `•i �;; • 1. 12 33 op �' � ^• , +1: « � i 1 b ram, CD'n.Y'. • f '�. 6 '• •� <� - 43 lS--}� .r i ! y • '-Y� �-- , \ _ CO YYOK I iY©Pul ` a7 ✓. «ram _ N r- r, i, ./i` •.[• /Jr - :• � � �` .. 1f r �' ,© —� •2 a .'! ao ./J. ,D n --- w n33 1j1- 't t! 7, _ n ,� ' t w 17 r� ,Ir J / r �, ti•�. Lft �+ i , •riw�O 25 C. 74J ~ .� l,. 1 ~ is 1 .3 f •tit � H `-I�-j-•n? -D \ \�_ a=t a R �-• S17' ♦ , �� -- _ ♦ J s Y, 1s n�• C0YYOYall _ 34 gas 7! « a way t aa.o ..+].. — T afvrYl.0 Jowr .rmfa 4 wY w .. a pm as I 1; aomKe I8047 w..».�.w. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ` LAND USE x•Eutt TOT"PRELIMINARY PLAT , STONE LAKES _ PHASE ONE t PHASE TWO .w�w� '»�.•w�.+»..� OIIN.OIRfIP rlt Mal_Yaa -•11 .Catf priN l.t raa ww w �. ... w JY ».... �.... � . sw� • av � .. w � .. fmin aa•r.cls a. r...[.11N1 J NKY N t•[I. aM1K1 ♦0. 1Ha _ � » w� � , • � � w -,w„� — .w• I.a J I 1.{7 N•.t7..tlta.['I ri YIJ AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLACE •uwa"a zo.Yao aoo71a-I TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ...s w s . w .., .� eo•[�snoY My C011YC1 •av w .. . � . w . �.....» � ti♦rL♦C • L♦Gl!aa'aY.0 OY'♦V[[. 0[. [LO•[■ ....�.... .._ twa.Ir THE %ZLSO%CORPORATM }HourJOBE .... .� w .. � �� � m � ♦.r.. aaYr. � I"' _ / Iw. w..w.ra a...a.am Yl � 1�rlualua.... Y.mr m K I•I• Yo v at•,.wYa ^.�..� uWii m1:10 1M0o7s°` CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 2, 1990 Mike Barnes Public Works Director City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-57: First Review of the Preliminary Drainage Study, Water and Sewer Layouts for Stone Lakes Addition. Dear Mike: Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plans received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we -offer the following ecamnents: WATER OavENiS 1. In the proposed commercial area along F.M. 17090, provide fire hydrant spacing of 300 ft. maximum. 2. In Cambridge Crossing, consider placing the water on the north R.O.W. thereby eliminating two sewer crossings. Also consider switching the storm drain and water at the intersection with Stone Lakes Drive. 3. mare is not a need for the water stub between Lots 46 and 47 of Block 1; however, a stub should be provided between Lots 8 and 9, Block 10 or in the vicinity of Lot 14, Block 10. SEWER C HMENTS 1. Provide a sewer stub between Lots 28 and 29, Block 1. 2. Provide an 8" sewer line along the rear of the commercial lots 1-4, Block 13. 3. We need to have a meeting aver the intended sewer service to the school tract. 1. Provide a note as to intended culvert under the main entry at its intersection with F.M. 1709. 2. Drainage areas L, P, and Z should be reduced or eliminated. Our preference is to grade the lots so they drain to the streets rather than aoc:�mulate any flows along the rear of the lots. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West - S �/ Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 f 5 - I [0-4329 November 2, 1990 City of Southlake Page 2 * A ocaplete and corrected preliminary water, sewer and drainage plan is required with the submittal of a final plat. * Me applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questicns, please call our office. Respectfully. FoR. Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \zaID067.pcn * Denotes informational ccmwzrt ca: Nelson Corporation I5-9 -_ __ __ i! - ..«.l.f. wiw,,a,.1•. rrrl .,.- ZOPROCOEPCIAI 'MTALM2d[D SF-70► - -^i_ S_itD_fFF -fl���03'•aliwrrirr F.�1 '+••/n•/ . -_-- ' 'i lull •IfLY! •f}q -_-- C.T., q ' x - t"N°I Cfrr / l` � i faro s t low nD wwii twe '1 i � ' \ `` •�� - A� -4'_ � ice• ,.- 1` i __ ___..c-- ` s� _�'y�'.'.`.�r"� tea. ; `' �'. ^ / ' Il 11 /, �� � •1 , L i �' \�_ � 1 --- ' - �`•' J, . ;a / — _ .\ / 1 I �. ✓ram .,T.r/ 1 !. t 1 y �,y .� \ . `��--1 _- it �' y ' -r• ✓ � '� ,. ��--��� -�A _ }, i -- •___ - --- 1 - • I�t.r .lnTlwltr Hirt � / % � ti .. n w �+«r � w•.�.ia- Arm. �r J'� � I ARGOT UKOM • - �^ 'w '�"•' PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE• WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN �M ,��t -_:•� STONE LAKES PHASE ONE i PHASE TWO fr.a.«a Z�. '•' ....._..._... wtww.r ruo •ctnx r M ru A _ � _.�_ r�wr�.r a r,r.xnas.•wa.rrw uw jf( AwM na ..r. t.ws. xwn. •wn.cr.a wr �. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOITHLAKE TARRANT COLNTYr TEXAS �!A _• ti�\1\Lt[!LT[OK OM�[t.'D[f40RM • •-_ TmB%ELSO%CT/R►ORATM RIILUPJDW OH•'SRE DRA 6%AREA MAP r 'w r•w I��,lmro .li....'. ,..r n_•. ,. •arrfa L DAAVAGE CALCL'LATIMS CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 15, 1990 Karm ZoningA& for City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Sauthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-57: Second Review of the Preliminary Plat of Stone Lakes Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on November 13, 1990 and we offer the following ca m ants: 1. The labeling of surxcunding properties within 200 ft. has the following deficiencies: Several tracts do not have warranty deed records shown. Label the plat records for Ginger Creek Estates and Sauthridge Lakes. 2. The loop streets Stone Lakes Drive and Waterford will have to be divided into more street names. Please meet with the fire chief to resolve this issue. 3. Lot dimensions are needed on the proposed dial lots. 4. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03-I recommends a maximtm+ of 20 lots on a cul-de-sac. There are 33 lots accessing from one point of entry on Cambridge Crossing. We would rec amnend a street stub west frcxn Brighton Place. 5. Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01-C allows Council to require a second point of access be constructed in some situations. There are 280 lots accessing from one point of entry on Stone Lakes Place. We would recce m*nd a second temporary point of access be provided to F.M. 1709 in the vicinity of Lot 13, Block 1 tintil such time as the second access to the south was constructed. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, Z'k Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \zai9M7.pp2 * Denotes informational comment cc: Nelson Corporation ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of South- "' 'ng and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • S, 5_ 0 Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 - 3-4329 . w'.f.uT[xf anca r[trA vr,rs �� mn I .ssn s tLr[ I'� rs.°rs .fn.nm m:sysa+ cfvnn tuna . � 9 ['xr o . s,nv. u M ZO"w --- ra Oq laouetstt WI I — ■teas cw[ I. tt•asar csaLrs __ f•w ��w! tea. - m.L 7 1° ZONED AG z'' 1. / \ ° '• '�y ` r u \ > f lid \ ~s ✓` �� } z JDNEf) AM • p . m zo :I la r i7s a ~ a 21 22 2! i ^.: 2a 2a alp / 1, s LL ' 9 !�«att■.r++. \,; — .0 2 a 7 Q 1 I, 35 I •1 al � � a ` w 'J' � �°'°/�'� ' ,tip •- ! as >• � at >• � ns .z f1� 4 ++ a! � � � M 1 �` � \ \ s 1 -may - I -.�.� "°` /� _ ,o 'i .. \ 7 \.: ✓ l� � \ i � �_-I-fa�-� � ;7F as 3 a ° •4 • a ... �� y s � � = /� �l s ,ay�t �► S°,' 'L ,/� i. i l0 1S '♦ /'/C / ° -I -.— IDIm -80-07 > \ Mild 44 32 Z a7 ' - ' / I♦ 7. / A°[A 1 IE yto �. / / za la }-- M 27 .� as r PJ a � � ' t 2110 b s '� _ ► j° a i fL ° 53 4. x r "" a -1 _ ,� ♦ Assn a 1 b�( 7 1 ' 42 w a I x`o. 2! /.7 I° >7 `� I° L ♦7 �` , 20 n Q r A tl 77/ tl S 115 14 i , •_gip\ 5'✓ .n :ti Af _ - ��- / a �,} E ` AAE, 2. o _ s. ♦ i• 7a \_• - n « i •I ,per 64f� ,F Sm f i t0 ♦a ' N sYMwA , •A 30 f az n ♦a 4a `� ss ',ss •.'�a $'ka II as■as\ frwxo $ _ f, =s =roA , swfd.rA mr raro[i ka Yr.a s. -• 2l - -., _ � JDtaD AD —�I nwwwt'.r w.+'.w....r 1 r 4- "go ND w.r+... LEGAL DESCRIPTION ♦ao•m N Z.IdW AG Aaaulat/ ....w Nbp ..� w.... w. «.. w.. w « ■...� ... . wn w ...., .. LAND USE SCHEOL LE ••, 7rnAL waor .. PRELIMINARY PLAT LAND rw. Ya or = m AaEACE •� .L UM norm LOIf /vrt7a 7.= STONE LAKES �`w`^� "` '�'■ nY. PHASE ONE & PHASE TWO ..w.., .. �. mw.«.. ,v m.... ooaefm esf.fnua tvtl.0 _w. Yams .errs ofrtartt rwm w+w w.«fY w.w wmmm �. rw..v w.. ■■++< tp,p. m.n.c,ovfu[minf0 tJ.I1-1 ..... ....1. NO. Ziff ., . w �ww � • ..m . �w . «+ fffl .°O Tti )-[. YIL[7 fYAf [T..tST[.Cr ♦O. M1ff 4 a'J~w ��wi� w"s...ti w .NIIOYIp Af7A0Va AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAK E PLANNING a zaAYO SOUTK A"_ TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS .•.3 w m •r m .a . w . nn nn w ...� + COMIaaON RANMfP°' a CL'O�N6 OM lr..a.DV-ELOFCR +.d m . m .w.. «.� . e� ......, .. _ Lwfr■r.t G — I I — THE V EISO[N CORPOLLATM PHMLIP JOBE J— sw n+.fma.o[ ane sure se ro. !� r ••.. .gym .. n[.s+sm masfr OL7'OtEa 41•st CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 14, 1990 Mike Barnes Public Works Director City of Sauthlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Sauthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-57: Second Review of the Preliminary Drainage Shy, Water and Sewer layouts for Stove lakes Addition. Dear Mike: Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plans received by our office on November 13, 1990 and we offer the following gents: * Revisions to the sewer alignments may be required depending on the method of providing sewer service to the high school. DRAINAGE C I'S * Our preference is to grade the lots so they drain to the streets rather than accumulate any flaws along the rear of the lots. Please provide for this in the preparation of the final drainage plan. If you have any questions, ease call our office. Respectfully, * 4 9 Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \zd9M7.pc2 * Denotes informational comment cc: Nelson Corporation ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of South, -- ing and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • S rj_( ji Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 _ :0-4329 ,r. ,r...v....• :r.,,l.,.f.. ,......r, �, ,......,,s.,,m .orran.,vw nrro.mn I ^�.�,:.. �.�..,.,....... ~ZONED C-T ' uAla f -_ -� r ., ZONED 7 rymrEDaF - xoa �. I �1iF1 _ rin• t.lsT - A'Arb�l . oz.l - �� tirae3r .'!i.. v _ � -- --_fib g ZOT ZONED AM-T i A� �' O } -ter- IT fit AC CTI AWAOE CALCULAT10 f•, r- y j,�1,•_ •• P •—r tc+mo rr.�a.,�e I.frr.w PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN STONE LAKES rw. —t— i f.rrw f..rfr _ —+— •+�• PHASE ONE & PHASE TWO ......� ' new.. run .clu wror .la `` 4• '.5 -•-• IJ. NO/N fYI•a1,.Ht.CT MO. IfH -� '� awl Tl[ J.i. YIL[1 lYIY[Y,.HTI.CT r0. rU AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE �w• �; TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1 5 -13 .. .ura+rrc.amTrmv+c �,Ol.,<LD.o ''..i• ..-.,• _ THE NELSON CORPORATION PHILLIPJSE O O"SRE aNA[f AREA MAP �`�Y� sw>u sn •t,smw � "" a ��•, m r City of Southlake, Texas M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-58 Zoning Change Request --------------- ----------- for .615 ---------------------------------- ZA 90-58 is a zoning change stractuNot 125554Tractsc3eS3Eut3Ff the R.J. Paden Survey, and M. The property is located in the 1300 to 1500-Block of West Southlake Blvd. atSoutheast Southcorner Peytonvillethe Avenueintersection of West Southlake Blvd. The current zoning is Agricultural; the requested zoning is Community Service. The owner of the property is the Carroll Independent School District. This property is the site of the new Carroll High School. They are proposing classrooms, a stadium, a field house, a baseball field, a practice field, and eight tennis courts on -site. There were fifteen (15) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries to this rezoning. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) of the Community Service request. KPG CITY OF SOUI'HIAKE APPLICATION FOR AMRiD = TO ZONL'VG MAP Application No. ZA 1qQ — 5Y To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southla_ke, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. NUE OF APPLICANL T: ADDRESS: CawVoll lvic�e Jev►+ School I I co N . Camil Ave DESCRIPTION (IIEI'ES AL D BOL IDS) OF PROPERTY RBQL'Fz= TO BE REZONED: See af}ac, ,ec ZONO'G RBQLTST: FRMI: AG TO: CS This application must be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. /r- /&/- �� DATE Before me, a votary Public, on this day personally appeared Rs!4- known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this /6 day of , 19 \t7T ho IC LN AND FOFVTEXAS My Cc missior. expires the /S day of �%]� 19 ej-- /4-1 I!YANK LOOP TROPHY CLUB SAN MINE- �5= r MN JONES NL i. •.'y - - 1 PMM NOWM MME IN am T nun LN IVER SWANK E CMNE It fit . WTLAKE ; u EATON COUNTY - r TRIAL LAM t No 0 4RRANT COUNTY aM n LAKE'" i ;O DISTRICT BOUND so Icxi M wit M ~1 1 MLLMN M'' 12 \ E eIEaCE17 E SVJTMAKE M wuE 1 Ly MOaMAN1 N r~ LAKENNIE ON - 2 1IA NILLTN MN .� � am LM ■ T ON ZZ io ' s TAnoI IT f 12 ELT M ! e • �O Is �IM ST:[ +! � s s U. ��w� � �� • � l NN� NOW fT. r NICE scroa r'j o ,LIB •IY• 1 r MOCKIN Il l IriIAN CT .• ~ y i I , 7 SLYM ROOM ►MMNNE L1 s `* auMNET MME ;' ATW 1 _ M 1 a TATM F �`t%INN}S 1 CIIMOCK •� s o - 1 ilFFf/ N L atTOV- E NraLErEEO - I =� � 7gUNWf TA � e CTfNE +6f u • LMMNN n i . IT I Tu CT L /( �e w JOHNSO ■ ! 7 PAR MKaLE NMNu1I n s Ta CT r e e N ^k � MCNMIICSTALT > I NOR CANTON C k d �- i ► fANNU3M KINiSNINO NNE CIEE ■ j , �j ♦ � J CALOOLL MIDDLE i -----•----- J i NEI� CT SCNDOL ` >� aI N J EAIIN + r� 3 ■e M d+ MI �c- r rfv COMOEou-'-N'{{ �n pMNF t LINE MNOT CT * a1J CITT 11I ' lusllr Neal t e� LOOK,= Nw<l %o 1 - ■ 2 Urwa n IIIQ N 11 IICENTENNIAL R1 3� 1 f011T PARK 111.1I- NOTNLAKE ILIILE _ �•!,o$��yy 1�� ` � 17M 17N 1�tr;6114 116 Is ^` ,I ; 4W tZ. GOODE FINE CT.I ; I �� e�+t! AINPONT li f�j ai LLAC " e - MMIOr L GIEE111000 IE-3-ITNUTAL +sue-_L CONT•'L`pI1TINENTAI kY0_ NI ILf1_ E • D1WE 1.70� ` - • CALLOLV ■ %. 1<G aT •• - �iL�MENIALT _ Sao f ��y�I / ••• -- ton :a COLLEYVILLE !G -3 A C STONE AG SOUrHWIND PARTNERS C-3 TR 1 116 AC ---r---- -- M. 1%Q9----- -- M i wm w .. PINSON MARTI fR 3 / -SON ! 2.02 AC ! % / TR i AG AG LAM I 1 15. AC ZOLLSD i TR IA TR 11► AG I /AG PROPOSED.CS TR7C LAM ! li AC ' wAG / TR sC1 s .69 AC AG LAM I / TR sC2 / s AG � 1.0 AC DAIRS s i �LI �� CS / / TR D 3 � P' 1.0 AC / % 20.0 AC,// ' K/ / 1 ASO TRACT s I i A k5m C. STAONE TRACT 2 LAG 2�3 TRACT 1 AG I LAMAR tw CARROLL ISd AG PROPOSED i TR v / I s � lt,AC 1 STONE KIRBY i ; / AG AG I I /7j TA ]F1 LL D OPOS CS P' 2 TR sC I ! STEPHEN W. SMITH 6.0 AC ! I AG STEPHEN W. SMITH \ AG TR MSA ! ! 6.0 AC \ R STEPHEN W. SMITH e 0 3 ! �1 ! AGAC `. o. STEPHEN W. SMITH TR 36 ! AG 6.0 AC 'I �w i 1 0 09 Olin - -- = I:I me ' N ■��I ------ - - - - -- e r I L� -_ I I I I I I I I i I I FiJ7URE PARK INC, I I -----1 I I ! I I I I I C L � I I I I I i i I I C�3 I CL I I I I I I I I I I li I`------- ! I 6US PARK[ NG -------J ---- � o C MUTT= MUM Um, T3zm . e 10/16/90 11:41 IM 214 580 8297 AYRES ASSOC 9 001 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WHEREAS, Carroll Independent School District acting through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent; is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the R.J. Paden Survey, A-1255, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract as recorded on Page 557 of Volume 4153 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being the same tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and the same tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING in Paytonville Road and being in the South line of F.M. Highway No. 1709 and also being South 00 deg. 43 min. 50 sec. West a distance of 77.47 feet from the Northwest corner of said R.J. Paden Survey; THENCE North 88 deg. 47 min. 35 sec. East along the South line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 17.51 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 2799.79 feet whose center bears South 01 deg. 12 min. 25 sec. East a distance of 2799.79 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve and along the South line of said F.M. Highway No. 1709 and through a central angle of 00 deg. 47 min. 20 sec. a distance of 38.56 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 89 deg. 34 min. 56 sec. East along the South line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 1264.16 feet to an iron rod; THENCE South 00 deg. 05 min. 35 sec. West, a distance of 490.09 feet an iron rod at the Northeast corner of said tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 607.47 feet to an iron rod; THENCE South 00 deg. 47 min. 05 sec. West at a distance of 539.35 feet to an iron rod at the Northeast corner of said tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 762.15 feet to an iron rod; THENCE South 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. East a distance of 434.32 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 89 deg. 38 min. 00 sec. West, at a distance of 1308.5 feet to an iron rod in the East line of said Paytonville Road, a total distance of 1326.0 feet and being in said Paytonville Road; THENCE North 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. West along said Paytonville Road a distance of 434.32 feet; THENCE North 00 deg. 43 min. 50 sec. East along said Paytonville Road a distance of 1351.42 feet to the place of beginning, containing 54.615 acres or 2,379,030 square feet with approximately 0.717 acres or 31,252 square feet being occupied by said Paytonville Road, leaving a net acreage of 53.898 acres or 2,347,778 square feet of land. 14- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 54.615 ACRE TRACT OF' LAND OUT OF THE R.J. PADEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1255, TRACTS 3, 3E, 3F, AND 3F1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO COMMUNITY SERVICE ZONING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF' TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE; DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise 14,7 producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such .lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changer in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 54.615 acre tract of land out of the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, Tracts 3, 3E, 3F, and 3F1, as more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From Agricultural Zoning District to Community Service Zoning District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. { - /�' - 7 Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00). A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1990. L A APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: LM MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-59 Preliminary Plat ------------------------------------------------ ZA 90-59 is the Preliminary Plat of the Carroll High School Addition, 54.615 acres out of the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, Tracts 3, 3E, 3F, and M. The property is located at the Southeast corner of the - intersection of West Southlake Blvd. and South Peytonville Avenue. The property is currently zoned Agricultural; the requested zoning is Community Service. The owner of the property is the Carroll Independent School District. There were fifteen (15) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries to this plat. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) of the Preliminary Plat subject to the City Engineer's letter dated November 2, 1990, adding to item #3 an eighty -four -foot (84') R.O.W. along the full - length of the school's property on South Peytonville Avenue. 0 KPG 17-1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/07/90 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION ITLE OF PLAT: 1G„ :.._ /�DD , -E C S MITTAL DEADLINE: l p' 15 , �'t o TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES: 5 4- . s ZA 90"59 APPLICANT k. Y,_S ;3 a, c oJ NAME: 'S . �-i • V4 . �' , iC.0 N \ T ce-1 S ADDRESS: tb (,O I M &e- A \Z-r" 0 R. Fj J p p, a. 3o)g Cv 11� 0 31 p,L(_Lds ?Ex45, n s 2 L I OWNER (if different) Y—G i E -s 1lo i 4 5 5cn - o i o,-n-j I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with tithe requuiren nts of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and to Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of to City of Soutlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at to applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request and address any unresolved issues. Signed: Date: For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ lif, on this to '" day of /`-1 19 Awned: Title: ********************************************************** **** ************************* The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shen Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100', 1" = 200' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner &.subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Standard approval block provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Shwa as dashed to lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines _ Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersections shown with street names 11' ;b CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES Novanber 2, 1990 Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-59: First Review of the Preliminary Plat of the Carroll Hick School Addition Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned preliminary plat received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we offer the following eemments: 1. label all adjacent tracts within 200 ft. with the owner's name and deed record and existing zoning. Zhis includes across the R.O.W. Please show platted subdivisions with lot, Block and Plat record. 2. Show, label and dimension the existing R.O.W. for Peytonville and F.M. 1709. Show a distance from property corners to the centerline of Peytonville. If the R.O.W. on F.M. 1709 has been transferred to the SEHPT, this R.O.W. should be labeled existing. If it has not been transferred, label this R.O.W. with the following note: "R.O.W. reserved for future acquisition by the SE PPI. 3. Due to past revisions in the thoroughfare plan, we recc m end that Pieytonville adjacent to this tract be upgraded to a proposed 84 ft. R.O.W. niis would require a dedication of 42 ft. Er, this tract. At a minimum, we feel the 84 ft. R.O.W. should be provided to a point 200 ft. - 300 ft. south of the south drive shown on the site plan. 4. label the proposed zoning. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, 4 X OR- Eddie Cheatham, .E.f \zA9M9.Ep1 * Denotes informational ccemnent cc: Ayres Associates ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-102 �� 3 640-4329 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES Ncf:ernber 2, 1990 Mike Barnes Public Works Director City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Sauthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-59: First Review of the Preliminary Drainage Study, Water and Sewer layouts for Carroll High School Addition. Dear Mike: Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plans received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we -offer the following comments: WATER OI'S 1. The fire chief should provide approval of all fire hydrant locations. * Off -site sewer lines and easements will be required to sewer this project. These items are currently being addressed by the City. DRAINAGE COMMENTS 1. Zhere are no drainage improvements shown on this plan. What are the intentions for handling the on -site drainage for this tract? If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, il ex Fare Eddie Cheatham, P.E. ua19m9.pdt * Denotes informational comment cc: Ayres Associates ENGINEERS • PLAN%=Ac . SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Sou 1170 Corporate Drive West • 817/633-1023 L� fining and Design, Inc. • Arlington, Texas 76006 • Metro 640-4329 ,�c s�part�.s�•znc -- �� ❑ v 0 8 3 1 1 1 A\ 0 1 I1-5 H I �qnp o�� U c:3 Z as O 44 U ^ n N0N oW� pp_p <W CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES Novi 16, 1990 Karen Cara ZcniM Addnistrator City of Scuthlake 667 N. Carrpl], Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Rs: ZA 90-59: Se=id Review of the Prelimiz=y Plat of the Carroll High School Addition (Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned preliminazy plat received by cur ,office on November 16, 1990 and we find the applicant has met the rsqdrments of our previous Letter. If you have any questions, please cell our offioe. Respectfully, JAM - Eddie Cheatham, P.E. oc: Ayres Associates L ENGINEERS • PLANNERS - SXJRVEYCM A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West - Suitp. 'I^'' - A rlington, Texas 76006 & 17/633-1023 - r 1 l _ 6 U29 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-60 Final Plat ------------- ----------------------------------------------- ZA 90-60 is the Final Plat of the Carroll High School Addition, 54.615 acres out of the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, Tracts 3, 3E, 3F, and 3F1. The property is located at the Southeast corner of the intersection of West Southlake Blvd. and South Peytonville Avenue. The property is currently zoned Agricultural; the requested zoning is Community Service. The owner of the property is the Carroll Independent School District. No additional letters were required to be sent. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) of the Final Plat with the City Engineer's letter dated November 2, 1990. In! I_ __ _ __ KPG CITY OF SOUTHiAKE 2/07/90 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION TITLE OF FLAT: Al ti nJ :�.�,..._. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: l o r I l 0 TOTAL LOTS: � TOTAL ACRES: �J" 4 • Ci o L %,,.1/I 9d bd APPLICANT OAR (if different) - NAME: S , u . C tJ . eL 1— E L 5 ADDRESS: PPLV U PHONE: ) SSa, - cq fl0 C,& a zoL-t_ �cOG I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed. request and address any unresolved issues. Signed: Date: For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ =, on this the ! "- day of 197. j Signed: Title: '_T� r_ C�.�.��C afollowing checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the W of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. x Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 100' x North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity t vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of... Title includes City, courity, State and Gamey Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation ^ Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) _ Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper "format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) r Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACEM PROPERTY (within 200' ) Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. _ Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shun and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street interser 8-2 own with street names Final Plat Pg. 2 of 3 Shown Not Plan Applic. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 2/07; Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage. Property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes shown Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. All property corners dimensioned to centerline of adjacent streets All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) (Replats Only) Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned and centerline dimensioned with bearings All curve data labeled (delta, radius, length, tangent) Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) Street names provided not similar to any existing street names R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order -r Square feet of each lot shown (Chart format O.K.) Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) Parcels zeserved for private use shown as described above Calculated dimensions for all lots, street R.O.W. and centerline, easements, etc. '>c Flood plain limit shown. Floodway shown and labeled with dimensional tie_ Avigation easement shown if applicable (Appendix) rc Minimum finish floor elevations (No. 483-3.03-D-30) Note also provided (Appendix) Deed Restriction Statement (No. 483-3.05-C)(Amended Plat Only) Flowage easement note (Appendix 5) %c Sight triangle note (No. 483-8.02) j� Driveway access limitation note (No. 483-5.01-H) Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) 8-,3 Not Included Included Pg. 3of3 2/07/90 A i< Complete and corrected grater and sewer layout Complete and corrected Preliminary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3103- -35) and No. 482 >c Perc tests for each lot°not served by City sewer Certificate of taxes paid from City Tax Collector >- Certificate of taxes paid fram County Tax Collector t Certificate of taxed paid from School Tax Collector k Any proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions x Any proposed Homeowners Agreements and/or documents Y Developers Agreement (Prior to Construction) 1 jvq CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES Nov--nber 2, 1990 Karen Gandy Zoning Achninistrator City of Scuthlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Scuthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-60: First Review of the Final Plat of the Carroll High School Addition Dear Karen: Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned preliminary plat received by our office on October 16, 19,90. and we offer the following comments: 1. Label all adjacent tracts within 200 ft. with the owner's name and deed record. This includes across the R.O.W. Please show platted subdivisions with Lot, Block and Plat record. 2. Show, label and dimension the existing R.O.W. for Peytorrville and F.M. 1709. Show a distance from prcperty corners to the centerline of Peytorrville. If the R.O.W. on F.M. 1709 has been transferred to the Sa P'r, this R.O.W. should be labeled existing. If it has not been transferred, label this R.O.W. with the following note: "R.O.W. reserved for future acquisition by the SWPT". 3 Due to past revisions in the thoroughfare plan, we reccamrend that Peytonville adjacent to this tract be upgraded to a proposed 84 ft. R.O.W. This would require a dedication of 42 ft. fray this tract. At a mini,mm,, we feel the 84 ft. R.O.W. should be provided to a point 200 ft. - 300 ft. south of the south drive shown on the site plan. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council mist be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully,to FIK Eddie Cheatham, P.E. ua90 -ppi * Denotes informational ccument oo: Ayres Associates ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-102: - Jr 540-4329 KM IN . .� ».| .*r_ { § o Qtzi ok ��! ■;, a v 0 H _— _,. .4N0l,3d w ,_ � CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 16, 1990 I;. t • - •.•.q zoning Admi n stra►tor City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-60: Second Review of the Final Plat of the Cgr=ll High School Addition (W our staff has reviewed the above mantim d preliminary plat received by ct= office on November 16, 1990 and we find the applicant has met the zegxizmnmts of our previous letter: If you have any questions, please call our office. � ZYr f� Eddie Cheatham, P.E. vOW•V cc: Ayres AssvCiates ENGIIYEERS • P141%gq 0 stm VEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of South- -"• 01--ing and Design►. Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • S `D - Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 *-4329 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-54 Plat Revision, Lots 6 & 7, Whispering Dell Estates --------------------------------------------- ZA 90-54 is a Plat Revision of Block 1, Lots 6 & 7, Whispering Dell Estates making Block 1, Lot 6R, Whispering Dell Estates. The property is located at 1213 Whispering Lane and is zoned Single Family-lA. The owners of the property are Glenn and Aloha Payne. They own both lots and are combining them into one (1) two -acre lot. There were forty-one (41) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries regarding this plat. On November 8, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of the Plat Revision subject to the City Engineer's letter dated October 31, 1990, omitting items 4 and 5. i� KPG CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/07/90 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (( (� TITLE OF PLAT: �� h;S�r, mac, 1Je (( S�aTts r� can 'J (�< l - Lot' L CTJHMITTAL DEADLINE: tr° ' �_ ' __ TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES: o� - 1f APPLICANT M4ER (if different) NAME: rL" glenn ADDRESS: ���Cy h �'s ✓n n'n ti �w Sok 7�e PHONE: 6�1 7 - y�/ - %i 3 '-1 I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Comnission and City Council gs to represent the enclosed request and address any unresolved is%ues. /, /- Signed: ( L" - A-,.,�4 -f 1,7576 For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the prel' plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ on this the day of 19 1". Signed: �� ?����� �` .:�ILI Title: -��kt)#- �following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the 1t of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 100' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of... Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACENT Tr PROPERTY (within 200' ) Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shown and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved co--- -'ans or preliminary plats Adjacent street inters 19 2 shown with street names IMK LOOP TROPHY CLUB RAr 4 ' MINE GO VINE • x 1 ►MRUr Nxlor CAERE I.BECK AN t: T.Y,}s•^ �+ .. 7 IAM M 4 SWAN f c4NE aTLAKE ^ EArON COUNTY ' i = LN :u T -- - TRLAKE N0 0 ARRANT COWT - °N TO LIKE ,r� _ E `•±��-` DISTRICT BOUND IO SOLANA tlNMNYI y E In M to N�M 1 "" • ` 1 I KAlfgf M of•Tl ,1 ' 1t ` E CMRCErt M sAR GLUETE 1 12 7 RWIMAKE MLw ' NrFwRM W Mt�M NO� N y MYF LOM M IEN `f v• W \ i AT LS KE p to' �• TATLOK fT I 0 E CT � • A i 1 lO �W RT Ev +� FKALOC G Icc 1 •� NINE IL w C KOtI s S IltMllr 3e.W i •• KL SCHOOI sl • • • U LN S I CMRIK } , rMKINctIK� yJu ��=TTANT CT „ I 1 IIM How SullmrT am M1rRORF <• r S CPA", v - = J f WATEP. M _ • KLARE. A _ _ T LAKEL- _ Aft 7 MK M R K NTATgN AN• �AINN AT : t •i, iSLEEPYMAELNy •eK TA - -le► _ ��YfEEO C �' `.`+ • ARM7 ROIINWI TO Ei CTINI�i for IN • A LMNNOM TA _ f WCFCT `'` • n :� ELEMENTARY T IMNANME CT x ' r j • N MNNLAM N gNUM fT f R MR CMnn C d * • t'A ''�' 74 iATFI{EtM Kim NSMMN ODIOD • OOYF CRFFCARROLL Ef 0 JIM M1001E ( Ntl ------•-•--- ' I' s Aq �f OOQ OCR OL ' �+ _ FLMEMCE M � _ J rEAMM f RN UK ���� �. EyArO M GREEN Woo.SLE "' • I .'tlEMMS n 1' CATE LATE NINNY CT 9 CITY 1 NKLRgEctti st- 1006E J HALL to = 1'ttgnKsgE x•�TN `1�= � ■ MMYO � g lICXUIIRUR MMM � 1 I MCIATENRIAL • `a PARK S•d W '1 Wf. g 17M RMTNU MNR- I1W MUTLAKE MEtd E a R • — — 114 GOODE A MEE CT.I - ^ s \AIRPORT } 1f } =�t LRAC Iv t , ;j- EACAANN� ul MRI rIC EL—MREEE�NNI OR L� • 7 '"'�N MqK � � CMT�ENE07E •••• [ ,• - CAR 140. ■ AY cONTIRfNTAl Mn_ E � • • • �9NR.N 170�Gf • CARRO �' 7 a � a i r •• �E�MEI�TK=T �0 / �/I� • 1MR �/`'l M �6/ afire i s; 3 / ••• COLLEYVILLE ' ER l eel 19-3 ' TR 581A .78 AC TR 501 I 1.95 AC I 1525 1515 LEE TR 583 10.0 AC 3' 28 27 MOFAT 26 29 S CHIN ES D0� 't � 2s 1414 1416 PANNELL 412 S(ItAT 1418 24 1505 37 .� / NS PEC 1420 30 1410 BELL LEE S� 201409 •� 31 1408 �v�' 1407 HOLLOWAY 1421 p SUMMERLIN 1.�0 i9 1417 419 A 32 1406 Q�,Q FRWOOD GIELOW WILLIAMS ROBINSON � 1405 i8 21 22 1404 PENDERGRASS b 39 HIGHFILL 36 SADLER 33 ROBERTS C]IARD.SOh 36 CHILDS 1402 1403 i7 SCHMI CIARFEL 35 BRANSCM I FELIX DENT034 co i5 14 13 12 14DD PURVIS A6�03 i 1200 1202 1204 1210 1 1212 1214 1216 1218 WHISPERING QQ LANE 1221 1i 1215 KOLBECK 1201 1203 1205 1207 1209 1217 1219 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 HIX BRATCHEF i MERRILL ABQ BANK SCO'IT MCCUTCHI AWELCZ JZACHARIAS BEN FRANIQ,IN SAVINGS 1 J �LES CARROLL I SD `SON Cc 17 1215 CS 1214 1213 LORIO 15R5A6C 16 4 15 5 14 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES October 31, 1990 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-54: First Review of the Plat Revision, Lot 6R, Block 1, Wftispering Dell Estates Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we offer the following comnents: 1. In the title block, change the words "Final Plat" to "Plat Revision". Also provide a date in the title block, and survey name and abstract. 2. In the owner's dedication, add the following words after the owner's name in the first sentence: "...according to the deed(s) recorded in V._, P._, D=". 3. On the adjacent properties, label the lot and block number for Highland Estates. Also show the plat record for the remainder of the subdivision. 4. — fie Av t Easement release should be provided on theplat--, 5. Curr+ently SFl zoning requires a front setback of 40 ft. , however the previous plat and adjacent lots have a 25 ft. setback as shown on this plat. 6. Label the square feet of lot area on the lot. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * Zhe applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, . Eddie Cheatham,P. . u0o54.prl * Denotes informational comment cc: Ward Surveying ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwe ; and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • Suii �-5 dington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 • IVicuU o,+u-4329 16 15 WHISPERING LANE (50' Right -of- Way) EAST 290.40 o� \~`a 25' BUILDING (LINE 0 0 41 15'-A I--. I I I 15, 7.5' I� I I IF `� I W O a W O WI It O 5 M: r IWo NI I r O = t t O F W I J Ili z �l 6t R I� BLOCKI I I �°n I I � �i II -� �---- - - - -------I L_ 15' DRAINAGE 9 UTILITY EASEMENT - _--- WEST 290.40 ° c CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT VOL.6692 PG. 48 FINAL PLAT 8 HIGHLAND ESTATES VOL.388-134 PGAOO LOT 6-R , BLOCK 1, WHISPERING DELL ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REPLATOF LOTS 687, BLOCK I, AS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-143, PAGE 40, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 19-6 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 9, 1990 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Scuthlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-54: Second Review of the Plat Revision, Lot 6R, Block 1, Wftispering Dell Estates Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on November 9, 1990 and we offer the following comment: 1. Currently SF1 zoning requires a front setback of 40 ft., however the previous plat and adjacent lots have a 25 ft. setback as shown on this plat. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, Pf ie Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \za934.pr2 * Denotes informational comtnent cc: Ward Surveying ENGINEERS •PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Sou'''------ T'-- ring and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • 9- 7 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-102 640-4329 16 13 VOL. 388-143 I PG.40 PRTCT ! I WHISPERING LANE 150' Right -of- war ) EAST 290.40 _ 25' BUILDING LINE ° I I $ I zs' 15' d I 0 �W 1 I 5 ,°�, =i W C In W9 8 0 F VOL.388-143 PG.40 0: W' >i 5 ~ 0 VOL.388-143 PG.40 PRTCT 0 6tR m _ PRTCT 87,120 S.F j 'I BLOCK I v°� IS DRAINAGE 6 UTILITY EASEMENT A� WEST 290.40 `� + `o I LOT 17 HIGHLAND ESTATES CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT i VOL 388-134 PG.100 VOL.6692 PG. 48 I PLAT REVISION LOT 6-R , BLOCK 1, WHISPERING DELL ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REPLATOF LOTS 687, BLOCK I, AS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-143. PAGE 40, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. IN THE C.M.THROOP SURVEY A-1511 SEPTEMBER. 30, 1990 19- � City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M MW November 9, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-55 Plat Showing ZA 90-55 is a Plat Showing for Lots 1 and 2 Samuel Freeman No. 525 Addition, being legally described as two (2)'acres out of the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, Tract 2H. The property is located at 2505 Rolling Lane and is zoned SF-lA. The owner of the property is Carole M. Tetrault. She proposes dividing the two (2) acres into two (2) one -acre lots. There were twelve (12) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries. On November 9, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to the City Engineer's letter dated November 1, 1990, omitting item #2. KPG ago - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/07/90 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION TITLE OF PLAT: Lots 1 4z S. Frcemgn No. 5z5 A4414ivn SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: 10/15110 TOTAL LOTS: 2 TOTAL ACRES: 2 %,) 90 - 55 APPLICANT NAME: G'. EME 5 M (21-.t1.% TETRAk;LT ADDRESS: 2 5 0 S Rolling Ln . Soy+k 1ake1 TX. MU PHONE: (311) fs l- 3y 13 OWNER (if different) I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request and address any unresolved issues. Signed: ��,� 1�1 .,,��I . « t Date: I (� l la —`n 7 d For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ 770 .1*- on this the 15 _ day of Ocf. , 1990. Signed: IL4/i4in/ Title: Zoni n3 /\dmMi S +rg far ************************************************************** ************************* (following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the - of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATICN On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200' ) Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. _ Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shown and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved corn---` --is or preliminary plats Adjacent street interse 20_2 sown with street names t I Mx Lp2 TROPHY CLUB sAr s d • _ . KE y NNU p - - : � rGft _EVICT E NM JONEs NA i ►■tUr NBL1001 OOOU ■ 2 UOOrO LASERVER d 4 1 CM■ It W ■ l=�R aTLAKE - EWON COUNTY - - - — — - —i - rw uxE Txo taEo ou — - 4RRANT COUNTY t TO LAU iIF ,o DISTRICT SOUND - SOLANA .. $IN �X M i p ' • -.ti^�:• 2 tNEOCENTM up BLUE I2 ` 2 NUTILAKE OIOOBLAp p r ~ , LAUINNE N - W W III NNLTN n vans j . .� JN a IOR LNP tl ON KUNLE Ip ' w< TAYLON ITa ICY e + —A T Fe , I� s lO � E; _ �� es � V 0NSCHOOLNt S CA RD r s 2 p0•' MOCNINtlI OLA =OrTTAO CT &F .'emu ' 2 R2I' _RS i ' aE u 1 ■0'1 Le — ' F ►rMN U LN - �• ■rrrt WOE f CA=I : � O VAT- e� �OANLANE.N �= T LAIEC I It `zIN I NTAT" !1 N aS iL11Of •tt O ' III SLIEn O !s TO ' rNLEREu C I t t/w F it NppU2 TN ' = CTME ` �bt �0! LN 1 LOMpp TO tT S=CT0NEWSTNOMAsCTx ElEM ST. IT UpNrlxAp IT E , A fAtREi p Np0 •' a �E T ` !ROILS ` l@JNO MWECUE All OEI MIDDLE�'d=r NN.Ip s 4r bq raowxoN SCHOOL E� �NrosN . J, rFAOOr q •+� LAA �+ —'Gat-ham pry , I � 0.0NEN � 0=T'n ■ s iNZII�iII P4 & i pYE LOOS Kin CT ♦ u pn ` N pi'I xEBLAp nL(� L► l LOOSE � e HAu � g c TO It MCENTENNIAL t�tBLUMNM `e PA01 i '� JM_NiON p _ I� OOUTNU OIYO_ 17■ OUTN fIAI(E BLYO_ E --f s N• ^' a �, I GOODE "ME CT. E Y e s `AIRIWRT LILAC I M El ONEEOW= s � C • pIM _ '! pIITMENTAL D VIL • ! i CANIIOLV I' e � S - MEI�lAIT, y e T ���at �� at 'ryEC� " � ♦ i/1�� it f� COLLEYVILLE t° ---• A - 2 � J Ai fix -Not Low W t� s LitMNQE r � CONEREC-/I •• I.E� � •• • • • • • • i —C t i AC TR 2B1 TR 2B11 TR 28B TR 2B7 TR 2B12 TR 2B12A TR 2B6 5B48 2 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 5 AC GREEN BOUGH DR. 4j jl� , TR TR 2B2 TR 2B TR 2B3 TR 2B9 TR 2B5 TR 2B10 2B4 �5 C 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1.5 AC 1.7 AC 74 65 } a CRASS LEDLOW GUSTAFSON WAYLAND ROGERS LOWRY RICKERSON 584C U) 5 ' TR 20 TR 2G TR 2C TR 2L TR 2N TR 2F TR 2J 35 AC 1 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 9 s846 t 1 2426 2504 1 2508 2620 2626 A, ROLLING LN B t 5 2509 2613 2621 2711 9 TR 2K Tp�2 TR 2E TR 20 TR 2R TR 2m I AC 5 1 AC j ,2 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC 1 AC SBaF WISBY MILLER FULLER ABSHER EUBANKS 445 �� ZALKOVSKY WADSWORTH SMITH 5B4L G� 5 AG i AC 435 BABARIA Q TR 2A -- -- 4 (, CUES EMAN 7.7 AC '•' 20 FRE Y ac �oUN 42 5 3 49 AC '2C 415 2 6gp5 AC 1 'A I I 405 1 C R 183 .47 AC TR iB 5.576 AC TR 2A1 2.9 AC 20-4 S URGE TR 2A2 8.7 AC TR 182 I TR 181 I TR 1A 2.02 AC 1.1B AC B.51 AC A CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES Novanber 1, 1990 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Soithlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-55: First Review of the Plat Showing Ipts 1 & 2, S. Freeman No. 525 Addition Dear Karen: our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on October 16, 1990 and we offer the following comments: 1. Add the following to -the end of the first sentence in the owner's dedication: "...according to the deed(s) recorded in V._, P._, DRPCI"' . 2. Provide a 5 ft. U.E. along the property line where it overlaps the Brazos easement. label the easement in Greg;s.CouYtry Acres. If this is not a general utility easement, please provide a 10 ft. U.E. along the south line of this plat. 3. Provide a 7.5 ft. drainage and utility easement along the west property line. 4. Please provide a date in the title block. * Zhe proposed lots do not contain the exact 43,560 sq. ft. typical of a one acre lot. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * nv. applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by November 12, 1990. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, For, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \zai9o55.pr1 * Denotes informational ccetment cc: Ward Surveying ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of South - ing and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West - S 2 Q -5 Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 - - 10-4329 DOE N. CRASS N.1. 44" /r. 4fd 2...4 Sr-1 orwEr L. wisor vot ISSs PF M 2.... Sr-1 'V POINT Or NEOINNIND DESCRIPTION --- VOLJL9B8-124 PG 145 DREGS COUNTRY ACRES z...4 sr -I PLAT SNOWING LOTS 1 8- 2 S. FREEMAN N2 525 ADDITION AN ADDITION TQ THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS • IN THE SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY A-525 KE ro'VEo s7-1 !.O Al'.. 3.0 .RCYJ RAMAM0.1.8 M/ 46M ftW z...4 Sr -I n N b COYF. MILLER Y.1.450f 4 4r- N 2yN Sr -I morw N'AoswoorM N.471I4Ir.14f7 z.N RN OwNEN. CAROLE r TETMAULT 2SOS NOLLINO LANE SOUTHLRRE.TE=. .81. 3413 1Sf CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES November 9, 1990 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA 90-55: Second Review of the Plat Showing Iats 1 & 2, S. Froeimn No. 525 Addition Our staff has reviewed the above mentioned plat received by our office on November 9, 1990 and we find the applicant bas met the requirements of our previous letter: * The proposed lots do not contain the exact 43,560 sq. ft. typical of a one acre lot. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. If you have any questions, please call our office. Respectfully, �dR Eddie (Imtbam,P.E. VaM.pr2 * Denotes informational ccauient cc: Ward Surveying ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Sc anning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West _0 ' 7 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-10,., - lricuo 640-4329 4 JOE W CRASS W/ 4469 Pt 49Z Zoned SF-1 VIC ICOLOW Vol 4634 Pg 49 Zoned SF-1 PHYLIS GUSYAFSON VOI. 5865 Pp. 417 Zoned SF -I MARCOS WAYL AND f Ios ro ; - Zoned S F-I DfnferllM �- ROLLING -- LANE -� N ry N 890 SB' 01" E 389.23 194.34 `oc 194.69 J" \° es 40' BUILDING LINE I f I _E W N N n 'NErL.W/SBr Vol 639J vy.763 ^ Iw LOT 2 w LOT 1 COY F. MILLER VOI i - ,,, N 43,413 SF= I.00Ac ry 43,391 S F = 1.00 4c Zoned Sv- 20nf0 SF-1 ry a N W ' C N _� N G ° L E A e LO W O i In e e O � n I I 4°,40 30' BRa205 RIVER POWER AND LIGHT COMP Nr EASEMENT Vol. 2073 Pg. 379 -. .\~ 194.54 194.81 \ry POINT OF BEGINNING FOR Sago S1'33"w 389.33 DESCRIPTION - 30 BRAZOS RIVER POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT Vol. 2073 Pg. 377 I GREGS COUNT/9Y ACRES VOL. 3B8-/14 PG /43 9REN7 WAOSWOR7N 101. 7104 e7 Zoned SF -I Zone AG PL A T SHOWING LOTS I & 2 S. FREEMAN N2 525 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS IN THE SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY A-525 ZONED SF-1 Z.O Acres OWNER: CAROLE M. TETRAULT OCTOBER 15, 1990 2505 ROLLING LANE SOUTNLAKE,TEX. Q 481- 3413 —/ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 515 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PARK BOARD FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE; ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS AND THEIR TERMS; PROVIDING FOR BOARD MEETINGS AND BY-LAWS; PROVIDING FOR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARK BOARD; PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS; PROHIBITING HORSES AND OFF -ROAD VEHICLES IN PARKS; ESTABLISHING OPENING AND CLOSING TIMES FOR PARKS; PROHIBITING LITTERING IN PARKS; PROHIBITING FIREARMS IN CITY PARKS; REGULATING THE USE OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND BICYCLES IN PARKS; PROVIDING FOR THE GRANTING OF VARIANCES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the City Council relatina to all nature of park improvements and recreation programs; and WHEREAS. the City Council deems it advisable and necessary t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. Creation of Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Board." Section 2. Number of Board Members, Qualifications and Terms. The Board shall consist of nine (9) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for three (3) year terms. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through nine (9). The City Council in making the appointments to the Board, shall give due consideration to the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Park and Recreation Board. The City Council if it deems it desirable, may appoint ex officio members to the Board. Such ex officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of office of such ex officio members shall begin on January 1st. of each year and end on December 31st. of that year. Such ex officio members shall have no voting authority for park and recreation matters. Vacancies on the Board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. Section 3. Board Meetings and By -Laws. The Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held on the first Monday of each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. C. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the City Secretary or the Chairman of the Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from three (3) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Board shall be reported to the City Council which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section. 4. Board Duties and Responsibilities. The duties and responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Board shall be to: a. Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation including development of long range capital improvements programs. b. Cooperate with other City boards and commissions, other governmental agencies, civic groups, and all citizens of the city in the advancement of sound park and recreation planning and programming. C. Recommend policies on recreation services and park improvements. d. Recommend programs of development, recreation areas, facilities, programs and improved recreation services. e. Recommend the adoption of standards for recreational areas, facilities, programs and their financial support. f. Prepare an annual review of existing park and recreation programs and services. g. Review the annual budget of the park and recreation programs prior to submission to the City Council and submit a recommendation on the budget. City Parks shall be defined to be all parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas owned, leased, operated or under the control of the City of Southlake, Texas. This definition shall include all athletic fields, swimming pools, gymnasiums, tennis courts, and other similar facilities owned, leased, operated, or under the control of the City of Southlake, Texas. -2- a(-a. Section 6. Alcoholic Beverages in City Parks. a. Alcoholic Beverage shall be defined to include any alcohol and any beverage containing more than one-half (1/2) of one percent of alcohol by volume which is capable of use for beverage, either alone or when diluted. b. Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or consume any alcoholic beverage in any City park. Section 7. Riding or Driving Horses in City Parks. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride a horse or horses within the limits of any City park. Section 8. Riding or Driving Off -Road Vehicles in City Parks. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride an off -road vehicle within the limits of any City park. For the purposes of this section, an off -road vehicle is a vehicle designed and equipped for use off of any paved roadway with such definition to specifically include off -road motor bikes, go-carts, and dune -buggies. Section 9. Vehicular and Bicycle Traffic Prohibited in Certain Areas; Posting of Signs. a. It shall be unlawful for any motor vehicle traffic to stand, stop, park or cross onto or into any portion of any City park other than upon a roadway or parking area as so desia_nated for such purposes by the City of Southlake. b. Signs shall be posted giving notice that all bicycle traffic is prohibited within any City park except in specifically posted areas or areas that are provided as parking areas or upon roadways provided within such park. Section 10. Time Limitations on Use of Parks; Authorizing Placement of Signs and Gates. a. It shall be unlawful for any person to use, enter into or be within a City park within the City of Southlake, Texas, between the hours of midnight and sunrise, except when City sponsored. b. Signs shall be placed at appropriate locations in any city park in the City of Southlake, Texas, to notify all persons of the prohibited hours. Such signs shall state "No Persons Allowed in This Park Between The Hours of Midnight and Sunrise." Section 11. Littering. Littering is hereby prohibited in any City park, including all trash and other items which may be left by persons picnicking within such park and not placed in appropriate trash receptacles provided in such park by the City of Southlake, Texas. Section 12. Firearms Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry on or about himself or to discharge a gun, pistol, rifle, or other firearm within any City park. -3- d-1-3 Section 13. issue special p, ordinance Variances. The Park and Recreation Board may rmits or grant variances to the provisions of this Section 14. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Section 15. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Section 16. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance other than Section 11, shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of Section 11 of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 17. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of or any ordinances affecting the use of parks with have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 18. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. -44- A1 Section 19. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1990. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1990. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 r TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480 Revisions Attached please find the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended revisions to Ordinance No. 480 per their discussions during the last two months. They will continue their discussions on December 6, 1990 regarding accessory buildings and uses, minimum lot widths in cul-de-sacs, further revisions to Section 40 (Site Plans), and revisions to Section 42 (Bufferyards). Also attached is a memo directed to the Mayor and Councilpersons from Arthur J. Sorenson, Chairman of the Board of Adjustments, regarding the review of the zoning ordinance. V#- KPG AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE P & Z RECOMMENDATIONS November 8, 1990 SECTION 4: Definitions NO. 480 4.2 The following changes are recommended in the section: All Weather Surface Fire Lanes: Parking Lots: definition 5" Concrete with #3 rebar on 18" centers over a 6" stabilized base or 5" Asphalt over 6" stabilized base 2" Type D asphalt over 6" base material to 95 per cent standard proctor density or 5" Concrete over 6" base material to 95 percent standard proctor density Kennel - Any lot or premises on which four (4) or more dogs, cats or other domestic animals at least four (4) months of age are housed or accepted for boarding, trimming, grooming and/or bathing. (No change recommended. Will limit domestic animals to four (4) by definition.) Lot Measurements - c. Width - To be changed to read: Width of lot shall mean the distance between the side property lines measured at the front building line. Reversed Frontage - Change to read: Reversed frontage is a lot which has setback lines on both streets equal to the front setback line as required by the Zoning Ordinane unless such lots align back-to-back with another lot which would allow both lots to show a side yard setback along the side street. Specific Use Permit - Add to definitions - a permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and authorized by the City Council for the use of lan3'wr structure in accordance to the provisions in 'SECTION 6: Nonconforming Uses 6.8 Add Specific Use Permits to the title of this section. Will read: Special Exception es and Specific Use Permits: Not Nonconforming Uses. the text of the section, substitute "specific"__ Iecial" use permit. SECTION 20: "C-l" Neighborhood Commercial District 20.2(a) In the Commercial-1, Commercial Uses section: 1. Delete Architects office. Substitute "Offices of a A z-; business and/or professional nature providing services not including fabrication, manufacture, or production of goods or manufacture." SECTION 24: "B-1" Business Service Park District 24.2(a) In the B-1 Business Service Park District, Office and Commercial Uses section: 15. Add landscaping companies to the nursery yards use to read: "Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies, provided that incidental equipment and supplies are primarily stored within a building or enclosed within a screening device. Nursery products themselves may be grown, raised, stored and marketed outdoors. The outdoor storage and sale of nursery products shall be exempt from all other outdoor storage and screening requirements contained within this ordinance. These products are established as an exception to all other outdoor storage and screening requirements as by their very nature they assist in meeting the landscaping, screening, buffering, and open space goals of the City." SECTION 25: "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District 25.2(a) In the B-2 Commercial Manufacturing District, Commercial Uses section: 14. Add landscaping companies to Nursery yards as #15 above. SECTION 26: 11I-1" Light Industrial District 26.2(b) In the I-1 Light Industrial, Industrial Uses section: Add 16(a), to read: Farrier (horseshoeing) SECTION 29: "MH" Manufactured Housing District 29.2(a) In the "MH" Manufacturing Housing district, leave the residential uses as listed. SECTION 32: "S-P-2" (Generalized) Site Plan District 32.3 S-P-2 (Generalized) Site Plan District, correct typing error in the third line from the bottom of page 32-1, to read: S-P-2 instead of S-P-1. 32.4(a) In the S-P-2 district, revise the site plan section to read: "Applicants for S-P-2 zoning must file an application for site plan approval in accordance with the following requirements: 1. Date, scale, north point, name of owner and name of person preparing the site plan. 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of 2 2'J , the tract. 3. Indicate minimum ildi g setback dimensions adjacent to all property 1 nes. 4. Designation and ocat' n of proposed general land use for each building area. 5. Designation of the ocation and size of points of ingress/egress. 6. Centerline of existing water courses, drainage features and floodway easements. 7. Location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys with location of all street intersections adjacent to the area of request. 8. Area map indicating the neighborhood in which the property is located. 9. Screening and landscaping plan shall be required where such treatment is essential to the property arrangement of the development. Such plan, when required, should include screening walls, ornamental planting, lawns and gardens, playgrounds and wooded areas that are to be retained. 32.4(a) Rename the remaining text of section (a) to 34.4(b), to read: / �� P The site '�st be resented in an approved final form to P the City -i r�—days prior to the public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. No ordinance approving the zoning shall be approved unless and until the site plan in approved final form is timely submitted. 32.4(b) Rename the entire section 32.4(c). SECTION 33: Supplementary District Regulations 33.2(a) In the Supplementary Regulations District, the Fences - at Intersections section should read: a. "At Intersections - On a corner lot in any district, nothing shall be erected, placed, planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to naturally impede vision between a height of two (2) feet and ten (10) feet above the centerline grades along each R.O.W. line for a distance of ten (10) feet by forty (40) feet. (see attached exhibit). 33.8 In the Appendices section of the Supplementary Regulation District, delete reference to the following ordinances: a. Site Plans (Has been incorporated into Section 40) C. Highway, Farm -to -Market Road and Thoroughfare setbacks (Has been incorporated into Section 33.9 f.) i. Airport Zoning Ordinance (Incorporate Ordinance No. 479 - Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance into Section 43) . j. Mobile Home Park Regulation Ordinance (Has been incorporated into Section 29). k. Site preparation and excavation ordinances (Regulated by zz-4 the Uniform Building Code) 1. Fence Maintenance Ordinances (None available) In the Appendices section of the Supplementary Regulation District, add reference to the following ordinances: Drainage Ordinance No. 482 - Perimeter Street Ordinance No. 494 Sewer Pro Rata Ordinance No. 493 33.14 Incorporate Ordinance No. 514 into the section entitled Health Regulations: Sewage Disposal. SECTION 34: Accessory Uses 34.1(f) Add ordinance reference regarding pool fencing requirements in the first paragraph of this section, to read: "Private swimming pool, wading pools, and game courts (lighted and unlighted), provided that if lighted, the lighting shall be so directed and shielded so as not to shine directly on any adjacent residential property; and further provided that any such pool or game court is for the private use of the site occupants and their guests, and not operated as a business. All "at grade" swimming pools with a water depth greater than twenty-four (24) inches and "above grade" swimming pools having a water depth twenty-four (24) inches or more, except for portable tot pools, shall be enclosed by a fence and gate of a height so designated by Ordinances 344 and 481 as well as the Uniform Building Code (whichever is the most restrictive) of such material and design to discourage unauthorized entry to the facility. Ornamental pools or ponds designed for decorative purposes and having a depth less than twenty-four (24) inches are not subject to a special fencing requirement and may be located within required front or rear yards provided that they maintain a minimum ten foot (10') setback from the closest property line.": Amend the second paragraph referencing pools to read: "All other pool(s) may be located in a side or rear yard, but not within a front yard, and shall not be located closer than five (5) feet to any side or rear property line nor be located any closer than five feet (51) to another structure." 4.1(y) Amend.._...the cc essory use section entitled "Temporary construction and/or sales offices" to read: "Temporary construction and/or sales office, including manufactured housing, only during actual construction for a period not to exceed two (2) years and located on property being developed. (May include individual builders if approved by the developer.) SECTION ark ing 35.5(a) In the "Rules for the Computation of the Number of � 2-5 Parking Spaces", amend this section to read: "Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be construed to be the next highest whole number." 35.6(b)(6) In the office, professional or financial uses section regarding parking, amend it to read: "Office, Professional or Financial Uses: (For all categories listed under this heading, a minimum of eight spaces shall be provided for the first 1000 sq. ft.. The following requirements pertain to the remaining square footage:" 35.6(b)(10) In the industrial uses section regarding parking, amend it to read: "Industrial Uses: One (1) off-street parking space required per 1000 square feet of under -roof industrial area and one (1) space per each 300 square feet of under -roof office area. SECTION 40: Site Plans 40.3(B)(b) In the "Mixed Use Development Site Plans" section, amend the section to read: "The proposed finished grade of the site, shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, building corners, etc. Note benchmark used for topographical control. Included must be directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type, and flow line elevation;" 40.3(B)(d) In the Mixed Use Development Site Plans, revise this section to read: "The location, dimensions, size, and square footage of each existing and each proposed building, structure or land improvement on the site, the general category and square footage of each intended use or uses to be contained therein, the number of stories, gross floor area, the maximum height, the location of entrances and exits to buildings, the percentage coverage of the site of the proposed structures, and the location of all building lines;" 40.3(B)(f) In the Mixed Use Development Site Plan, revise this section to read: "The fire Lane width (20 foot lane) must be designated with all curb radii adjacent to the fire lane labeled (minimum 25 foot radius)." 40.3(B)(r) In the Mixed Use Development Site Plan, add to this section to read: "Designation of the location and size of points of ingress/egress to the site. The City may limit entrances to one entrance per lot with shared drives along arterial AV-i vcc 11 9 SECTION 41: Concept Plans 41.3 In the Content of Concept Plan section, add the following four (4) items: o. Any proposed zoning labeled. p. Existing zoning labeled on all adjacent tracts. q. Land use designation from Land Use Plan labeled for subject tract and all adjacent tracts. r. Owners' names labeled on adjacent tracts. SECTION 43: Airport Overlay Zone 43.3 Create a new subsection in the Airport Development Zone section incorporating Ordinance No. 479 (Airport Compatible Land Use). SECTION 44: Board of Adjustment 44.12(tt) Add "CS" to Outside storage Special Exception Use section. 44.12 Add the following Special Exception Use to this section: VV. Accessory buildings located in the front yard. Allowed in the SF-lA, SF-lB, and RE districts. 44.12 Add the following Special Exception Use to this section: ww. In -home Day Care per state regulations. Allowed in RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B. 44.12 Add the following Special Exception Use to this section: xx. Add In -home Swimming Lessons. Allowed in RE, SF-1A, SF-lB, SF-30, SF-20A, and SF-20B :- -A ntial_P.U. containingless than fifty (50) acres to the Speci Exception Use section SECTION 45: Specific Use Permit 45.6(b) In the Specific Use/permit. section for Alcoholic Beverage Sales, amend to read as the state statute. Subchapter C, "Local Regul ion of Alcoholic Beverages" from the Alcoholic Beverage de is attached for your review. z),-7 45 2L n SIGHT TRIANGLE u U--7a R.0 1.r Y. >.7 7 D 7 D T? C _ C Y v O t u u C -0 C 7 y 41 L .; w N- Y ; w C V = n TCJ •� C 3 �A 7 CL 7 9 C w - .0 1 s y C y 6 E' r V Y _ L J L L G _ N 7 C t y ^ L J y y 3 �• y •� 70 G J 203 == 72 = V L 7 m w •� 7 '. = Z Y L v V v N O L O C 7 7` C y v c�a ,�,� � 00 -= j n 7; 3 3 t iY •j C�. •• Y C N S Y i- ? .. a s= u C t E v G" = a_ 6 u �Ji 7 C E Etj O e 3 N s 7 eo - >• - i t �` y- C � 7 e C_ 00 _ y s� a E C CL A 6 r u s N N a v _ '"C- toc so 7 lu- c 0 >% L� 7 „ •� - .7 7 C N 7 G y G 7 L L t � 'C .V w � > 7 t 7' E E'- L 7 y; 7 w> N -J V y Y` C C C 9 L L L` 7 9 C V y L 0 L 7 9 A C a u 3 c t 3 y t e I w G C v -u Z^ OO 3 '� 7 Y C tyi E?>> v C �' 7 V E C 7 w N O u .. u 9 u c s = A s 9 � s c ' ,� y o o s = C_ a - u V Y L,• e H a. t v N 7 " a+ tJ > V C w .� , C .� w V C O H C E c u e s - e ee w s U E- a a e "' N E w E �° a° u u= E 1 > c w` O + L 7 < C; s l'. Z �... r y Y a �. y E C Z L y C C Z C w w o d O Y > ; V E ` `r u t V E t a s Z y? we 0 3 i s yt c `v »- �_ s e M Z 9 C. c„ u r v`- a ILc W N ''? 3?- c.E u 1 C Z L 3 C? •u y .V L 3 y `^' J>> V E %� _> > y a C 'i. C C A C Y s E 6 y e�f 7 ^ C C a 00 7 , i. .0 y tj „ Y L c_ L s .y. V ri Y `. a G 1 _ r Y L w z.- V Y y '�` - 01 G s 1- C G C 9 �. V +� J 7 9 9 ►• 7 y '� 3 L d 7 3 00 a L Y 1 = '� 7 .J. y N » :J Y Y Y L - Y GL E Y V A 7 C C C 0 J r -?' L 7 A y 7J L +� C J J .0 Y = Y ri z'`. N T L - .. L L L J •C D >. v c c P C w e0 Y L .0 N L> >. c V y Y y 7 b 3 c y = ._ O>> C g t ,� - 3 s c u C L c> 3 c 7 3 Y 7 7 L a = ii ^ ^ •.: e•1 E• ._ N G C ci C yJ N s V y L C` C >. 7 y •? C >+ L C V y �n V Y •N �. C G .... L y? a' s v s a u M q y? 7 Y` `. 7 t�.1 % V_ •� w 7 V 7 r J C C 7 Y 7 C t C y V c C u E N c� u a 3 a C_ s e I. a _ us a E e c%= s c v c c N = i. < v sa v Gcc zl e u .: .i a 7 `• ti ep t a N Z 7 s u C °L0 _ ww zoV L7 < O G o -• E y o G�pC �_ c -C� 3 a OL C E u- v c 09> Z>„ c ^- c eo r - ? y •= F - �,, Q6 E V= '•,^ a s L u E E= u` o < = Z 0` N U U ! C O■ •^i cp �.eE = E > > Y o VO Z a.v C� u e a v ;�' > OF 0=c'E c 2 ? u E 9 u` cgs 2: !ems o u _ .r •7 W2 20 G >. » y 7 v C? L 4 wt C �! < E e 3 w 7 >' r V C ! 7 �• :J G• r C r u= Y Q s y - �, c - rz . w '-' w U y> 3 47 c ._ c v C y y c a a C ry U V= Y „.3 _ r a F s 3 3 r c c E- t E C ^' C O t s _ a a== t u Y s O O (!�� �� !!O 'tj 3 JL Go 16 a �p C L r. - J • t L C c 0 5 NLO C ;� .'� •� on L N u t V a` P4 �- 7 � N u CL 3 I...r.0 da ; u c •: i w r a �i �c ;N � L �� a c L ... G /f H e a? t b E s c C 7 u` E O n W) n c � '� C _ ` Y Y `` y ``` .> C Y >. M L Y L 00 Y Y C y A A :� O L O Y 9 > O O O --Z O C N O L M L D O c t N u C L= A u v u c` O a°- c M C r C a O w n- �^ N N Y ` c C N-- Y ; V w - c w Y - Y E w Y E t Y c N _.c ILI_ __ j N '_ c O° E Z .- v E •E - >� C E s o E _ e K r 'E 9y' c` L �" - v N C y u_ E o 40 D O u >. >` •� Y x O- D = L u Q O ` .. a` C E w N - c N«- c E L n n E � D N G C ? 7 = u E_ x;; u E c C o c c N -0 o y y v y 3 N c< L c •- u 0 O 2.0 O w O w$ O E w v t L G- c u 0 O O a? u'0 L' E C u y u `v M r:. >O ` C .C, '- c C ry. E.` " A .! N v C •`= N C E >� ` e s w •. t o y s' E u c c 9 ° w e r o 0 0 o N� E> y �+ =+ C Y ` w C C u 7 L y `' y N G' O w 00 V! J Y Y r' G M •u Z O 7 Y M O° •in w E C .j ° u a A .= C C m >� O' 1 n Z 0. O L c_ w M � p c>_ c 3 a- u D ^ N c z L E' ° c r s w p 7 Y >. N ° N G 'O-n 9 e°, u o. N-a `v t - Z w v A eN+ w C- F n E' = L c w >` + -E o N '> y S o ° -E >_ : tCi N u `o n a a C o u < u ao w » r' q O 4 w i O L u O` w p« L u`° Z u L C u u` t C N w = ; C a y 'N .0 00 v L Z fJ < w M ` w N «; v N c N O; C O- N w p« O C { C� O n 7 >. N Y •C •N C V� ` Y w O R m u E A Y O L C t 7 .� y >, N Y ` S C 'E �i C 'i1 Y 7 C 2> G j 5 O c c M L C E E u "C u Z; L 0 O n 3 G n O= r u> C U y V `' ` u L w w O t O O p= Y �• V = 3 {�y/ '^ v L w L C C A t°CL ,, N n N t = .r - O C L C G - Y w w y t t N Z= c D E C u w y L '41 yj w O> w O L wGO.« O= o at = w '� = '�" 'u ? >. E u-0 c y s t .c M >• a o c c t u a. L c= v: u c u '" C is 9 'o Y = u 3>^ o f E 0,0 c V a N c i 40 s- E w` t >; c « w w u a tC E E a 'e .c c �_ p o c + u a w v t u p c 0 0 r, N •N w �i u _� y C E u` G ._ 3 .E ' G a i� w a s w C Z w sE/ p« a+ Y D r �+ •Y N s > w O c E N C O y s ` `' a e �+ .0 �+ w .y a 0O C _ a E - Y '•� Y u E u O N " Q_ 0 w 4 �yy' C N LO w a g O c y L y tv� Z >. M C O C T a0 Y Y > a w .0 6 �' O G a t t w ` w Q: 0` Y 0-0 O O-j Z>>°.7 9 C N «-'> O N L G O �? C_ L. it'C w = O t D u c 2 O` �� M C� •bt O y y O N y« ;; •C w 8t� c Q p; � v'> C C 7 G w N u > w w 9 M 7 L ; n 7 0 G- C N w ,Q L >. N twi Y C - E Y T y C w L E. A D p 6 •C w w~ L C-S w c c, L n V w e .c p �- _ w c L y N N a _ L C v ` L O �+ .X O t� w w E n M L 0= q V 7 s >. N C C 7 C Z< 7 C t_ c�, u` L L 7 _ C N 1% J c Y u 7 .. R �^ C GPI ` O t u w A t«i N w N t , C Y ` `, = = ` r ^> ^ -S t = a E a=0Lv1 �� = w t 7 p n t o ' ,y„ �' a _ e E a z _ N C y 7 O N ,n �• t .- '^ > Y C E �^ p N t, > y y _ E >` C C �n r. Z O r-'•� :i7 C N Z >' O O _= N C- 7 '� O 7 7 7 = vc C a u u c'E3 w `= E ey0 - M C j Q- ••. �. ^ .. v y M '^ G; 7 C C C y •C .� O , N G `(,� Q y :i n .� Y C Y N •- !3 Y L Y i., ^ Q O •O C y L N _Yy C _ C .> _ -J q N_ tf�,, L .I ep O w ;� y C r= PJ L L �• C C •- - C 3 Z C 8 a •E -0 Oy0 •C N L 16 ._ G C o w= L _ Y 3 O n :n O Lo _ Y v ' Y Y N j- r '-' C C y >' " `Y u c= `o c s ° c t i >; c a •E - E SC M o o r w= 3 c_ t` N y t u �. = 7 fv u 7 `` Z O N e E Y 7 C A Y c E L r. G+ y w 3> C w 7 y = 7 V t C Z L C -` L L C Y M N' ? C y O = u c a. d v_ W v -u t` ; a L E c w v. V a0 Y C V S E A C Y t Y 7 OOGG _ C; w u O E O "c " r �i 5 w t i N t t u p •dL a ii O D O C ` y S E C C O u Y d' vv a� J- t z ` T L Lao Z C =`= c 16 0 C j a �n j C "` w C tr v C' O s v- C •w �; aw► « H = s u °_° „ e E O w u ryp` a> L 8 c J 7 C y t O wo m y t O .- Y C26V G G �, ••pp° = w ` N c M C` •n C C w u L E {ii E 3 r T w M C% y u u p E e_ L+ w t = u N w C =' t= �= °' c Cso = o o c v o Y O C C s u `,-, u Z c_ ` = E t a v Y V t r �y C t j Y C c L V w •� V C C y ; L C C J C`< 3 G N O •C G �. w �. t G y� p y •E = O- c = , = - = p - ,,, ao u jroY L L o u O .0 '" = ^ i �. Z N= R N F „16 > -� c Z a E 0 N w v o" c N v e«i C O O N 'u c G�. i so 9 v u a w a N t n L O N Y C .Y ar ! Z- V C j N N .� Wo C IJ ' i « _ C C = = �. V a .. - V n .o y M 'v C �`. == a u Y " p '" ; v O u" w n c S p X c u e 3 a r .� ? v c- =* A. Z L a= ° e w e a. o ,,; G __ C Z« 7 iE =` S. < •m 7_ 3 {il N Y O V >+ u w O a t t+ O O •C C_ C a w - w E� E� >. Y 7 C H 3 w u A, C= O V- ;° C y Y .5 C 7 p u L N 7_ O Z` _ L u _ L ^ w O E �' v u _ - v L `ci=i7 _ Z E E �'r' Lp c >, aL r c cam= u> ; �so v OL �L W. .c E�OLL = � .E C `o w E9 a`. E < c ._ E .M -= o. c e s Ems.. U__ ,� a< c ;Y' N N w r. v Y c; y N c_ N c N u .. u w c_ >. ,,, w w G w = c L« 7 V s. < %_ Y 7' V �+ N 7 w L �" A v E C y = e u 7 < Vf N E e � v E a..> c N C e e o w y u w= w c a= _ •• E 3~ - f 1 u u = s 'E ° � t 6 Y Y Y i C t - ►Y. 'N C V n, V - V a C w- N C Y w N Y v c _ L O O_ �. c Z Y"_ « C u �_ - _ - - Ci 7 O L 00 = L -s `w c `u u E h '^ u F. u 'w a L J5 y° a •= a v c Y w t u C L> 'E c u Y �_ u w E .E u _ = Cr C N= 00 .i y C; v i N u t V h M N H A E A 'V V w= T Y N' c G Y C 7 L ; 7 y N N Z_ Y Y E _ Y 00 N c Y -p L �C 7 t N L L O w w •� Y E N Y` Z _ t w _ t •.. ,w„ L:. t 4 U Y N M -2I— `1L Z 0 c p c � awe. p co .ru. 4u r g a �R C O "' 7 Y .N. O c c Y 2 Y w s0 Y fd V .v E_ 3 Y$CL = O w C c C C = ~ 0 N �. w .� C y O w C> N •w it u �CCC Y Z C E Iwo O=� w I Ow x o � c E C.C. `- C� `o = �> � � Y E Eo w c E : o. E a`i� i e i� Y` o E _ e < o_ E c o 2 t X A� w �.E= �= � c o c to C � C O 9 1 = O E € `ono d1 C. oho Y Oif.4 o$�o w` Y Y +� � Q�tQ all Yi O c 2, $ mo t e C C" ii �> c O>-- i � O cw6Cc �e Y •- w w �- .S i O I- c G C— L a c;- O O J Y .. y ` G c r` �' s E a c C E= o c s c w c o r � _IL o• o �4 o g o .,, C Z E-0 �+ i t-' o i Y' r ii w C r w r► -�i_w E Sri ' o S� �_ti: E E a �0S M v M E' e E IL. �+ w Cc v v � y� 3`c`� s� %�.^.,.E o"$„c IV Qoo^o7rw e J5 tx Y` 1216 w Y o '.w C w o E E A z 7d November 13, l JC i`� �l. _ ✓%i _ -- Matta P. nr r.r, '.1__•r.n:.( m - -rn T•- ^ T T - n,:n -. .i% Tiie •att•ached mem0 l 11j v/3u i wa3 presented to P&Z on the same date as the board's initial input to the review and revision. process. Those items not covered in tile'' 11/8 meeting will -Ze taken up at r&Z's ;text session, and the board will again have represenrat-_o:1 at t:.e meeti. ,l 2 . r 011 Owing the meeting, tale P&Z chairman. and I br ie� _2, discussed several areas of mutual interest and concern. They are presented here to inform the council of our desire to establish a communication bridge between the P&Z, Council and board which will serve to keep the three entities current on areas under consideration by one which may affect related matters in another. _Y ra_.;7�!' : re: e:.e pp h, at_' _ y'•_._�_. !_1 :.._e_- 3: S_, 1?1 e:...- �_C'. _'u_ inS iia _.-= mat___ o= rd1na:_cc pr•ov .>1 _ J :'. need l.i '2a_�I �t�0I1 -._='+iSiGi1. dzliE: present Pra- cti. c � iiDIIlitY iilg � e juc for special exception use to the Board of Ad;ustment as opposed to returning this workload to the Council. I recommend this, as the board finds no problem with the workload or with its own ability to competently review the requests. However, apparently some uncertainty about this has arisen out of previous discussion with the staff and city attorney about the petroleum operations question (above). The board will formalize its recommendations to P&Z and the Council prior to the next P&Z meeting. e. A suggestion that one member each from P&Z and the board form a joint commttee for continuing review of COS 480 and related ordinances, to the purpose that periodic recommendations for change may be presented to the Council with the indorsement of both the board and the P&Z. 4. These are only points of discussion at this time, and are not presented here as recommended by either party; but you should know that both parties agree to the need for increased communication. Sincerely, , i3e-te zZ y,. jj1� idL �S :f �� ?y r + �3 }a.,p♦ .i'��Jr L;jj _ )};lT � 1:"r. :� } +- ient_esery. Tav�yi� =1e .g and ::t_� :s c ;r'en •( you know, :ne to � pec veiy? 'v;th an eye subro-vision oru:^arcec i-s.pus 3ru .update and correction where reQuire�. ,n° b 'ard �" r �T •1- �} JS - - • f!1r� �m TM• 1- in _• Ur - • - r.ese a! added �:' 3e ?or tev )' r"Zr' Epp-vpriate :J oUT rBY:@Y. Section Recommendation 4,Seek City Attorneys definition of following terms: ACcessorY Building AUessorY 1)se Develo ed Change Lot Measurement (Width) ltion linesmeasured to mean tat distance between the side pro he p Y the front building lines. Change definition of Reversed Frontage lots to rea4i `is a [corner] lot which has setback lines on both streets equal to the front setback line as required by the Zoning Ordinance unless unless such lots align 1 22-'9 _ 1 i t •• ly JeF:L�;. --Y-;iM•}y M� �f �ii�:''.y inn i.0%ng 3 ;A _... S v . _ i D.� Sdb-tltUte 157erifl ' for �Saec:ai' JSe �er3lit in para;raphs in this sectilon. .,' c.,, - -- - .F }maS it A recommendation that all Special exception Use re'IUeSt3 y0 to P&'c and the city Caun=21. Recommended Sy Chairaan Wright, concurred by Messrs Tate and Samartin, opposed by Mrs Payne and Mr Luce. (I'm not privy to the rationale leading up to this notion, but it may be an understandable response to our concerns over the mechanics of re -review in petroleum operations special exception use. More on this below in Para 2.1 34.1(f) Pools:Reference Ordinances 344 & 481 for fencing requirements. At the top of page 34-3, add the following phrase: '... nor be located any closer than five feet (51) to another structure.' 2 �e Stl* f 31 Owed .4. St -7 5: ;T7 tnnal 1- - . j :' -- A , - the _ia,f zor a ' Z are offered items, perhaps not routinely, encountered in Ft.,. deliberations, below as input from the -oard. i. on Section Recommendation the SF -coded Discussion: These sections deal with 11,13,14 here relates to apparent districts, and the concerndimensions In disparity between development regulation these districts. Thedisparity appears in two sets of criteria: lot width, and permitted area for accessory buildings. Loth for one -acre districts (SF-101 is a e is required of SF 30, and minimum of lool. The sas of SF-20A t SF-209. 3 22-4 -ss::.--Y buildinc ar�a I_ 3 T 7 Z c. - ---- ----- -juilding. laybe enough for a Ford ?into and a bicycle, if you hang the bike f r.3% the ceiling. RECOMMEND: (based on the assumption that redefinition of accessory buildings (4.2, above) will separate the family/servant/guest house square footage criteria from other accessory buildings/uses) or SF -I districts, mt., change. For SF-30, 1,000 sq ft of building per acre. On a 30,000 sq ft lot, this vould be 661 sq ft. A maximum of 750 sq ft might be considered for the extra -large lots in the district. For SF-210, 1,000 sq ft of building per acre. On 4 22-17- Iit spec:ai ex+=rption for screening requireients ;n this re,gar1; a C :+e On y rai`+?r :s.:ls5:_ n 44 Telat vc5t-facto minor construction encroachments. But 39.1_.e? authorises the board to grant variance or perm"' special exception to screening +ei ht ; riteria. �: - a. base question here on specifics of special exception, but a relatively minor point to the larger discussion; it doesn't allow elimination of the screening, or variance to anything but height. But the reference to variance is superfluous in any case - unless specifically prohibited by COS 480, variance can be granted to any permitted use that meets the 5 U-13 il he fat' 3, 4: :h n provi n. Q f c r - 0 r v ..few facilities and use compliance under s?.?:; i' e-7e.--tions aranted for petroleum operations. I might add that the boara, appreciates the wisdom of the r o u r. c I ard P&Z in this tatter, and fully supports t`, : -- : n c e ? t o on nu a -2 v i e ,j by Vi e �o a r J the p-l-Nisi"ns o 4 !" OU S 480 do not, in my opinion, precisely fix the responsibility and procedure for the boar4j's review of this use after the initial special use exception is granted. In this regard, we must not assume the conditions in 27.4 extend specifically and uniquely to 27.6. 1 suggest another approach; change 27.4 to include i Le 5Qu2ewt for the tciaR 2 ta :- I 2d2y,S wml of 412or Ae b to 'Um 2I222JZ rwin of ME Vzog pemit aq::MtwrS 2 -. : 2 rg i - : i t : 1 ", a : - - n A 1 - s � ; 7 1 : -; 2 d . dwert292m ty the 1m: oat the Teneved OHIO, eel 5 r» b Qd2g3lz« 9agg2g ise w2l5eR ii iemil « tre peri-t. T ,';ear up the structure of thil Process. But thve is one ad,4itinna: .4jeasure thit jou:d insw NOTe and competent revie-i. 2i, HarJ 4ould ar....' the, C-;.--ur.c;: appre,-ia@, a PIZ reviw t: the Hard on all :-2 bui=lg per9ts as an added layer of Noe, Ce-NMY, the aRGia and :,-apetir-e :f :1Z tesb;a tnesi caplax weas of planning WOW te helpfa ta tS pality of the total Wnt. Art St;r�sor 02-032 7 aA- L5 City of Southlake, Texas - M E M O R A N D U M November 16, 1990 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Revisions ------------------------------------------------ Due to the length of the last Planning and Zoning Commission agenda on November 8, 1990, the Commission chose to table their final vote on revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 until the next meeting. This meeting is scheduled for December 6, 1990. The anticipated -date for City Council's consideration of the Commission's recommendations would be December 18, 1990. This item has been advertised for the Council's consideration on this agenda; therefore, a vote to continue this item until December 18, 1990 will be necessary to avoid readvertising. KPG 21 DEDICATION !ftft OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TALL01TT i '7?I0MAS MAHAN ww. r.. w... .r. APPROVED (DATE) CITY O'F SOUTHLAK E PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 4V VICINITY MAP SCALE 1"= 2006 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE 1"=50 APPROVED (DATE) CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SO UTHLAKE ✓OE W. CRASS Vot,4489 Pg-4 Zoned SF-1 -- o ROLLING — L.ANt I "IN a N 890 58' 01" E 389.23 , l y`> 194.54 194.89 `` \tat• I "(Verb..w. a� \ti I � l 40' BUILDING LINE DEWY L. W/SBY Vot 6393 Pg.785 Zoned SF-1 POINT OFBEGINNING FOR DESCRIPTION -E LOT 2 43,415 SF= I.00Ac M M N N N t 0 Cn LOT 1 43,391 S F = 1.00 Ac. L— ---cab --- — Ic"'.30' BRAZOS RIVER POWER AND LIGHT COMP Y` �o EASEMENT Vol. 2073 Pg. 379••. to � �\ 194.54 111 1\ 194.81 S 89 0 51' 33" W 389.35 30' BRAZOS RIVER POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT Vol. 2073 Pg. 377 GREGS COUNTRY ACRES VOL. 388-124 PG. 143 Zoned S F-I PL A T SHOWING LOTS I & 2 S. FREEMAN N9525 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS IN THE SA MUEL FREEMAN SURVEY A-525 ZONED SF-1 2.0 Acres OCTOBER 15, 1990 N W N N N i ux Vot 4678 Pg.33 F-1 COY F. MILLER Vol. 4508 Pg. 470 Zoned SF-1 BRENT WADSWORTH Vol. 7184 Pg. 1897 Zone AG OWNER: CAROLE M. TETRAULT 2505 ROLLING LANE SOUTHLAKE, TEX. 481-3413 THAT WHEREAS, Carole M. Totrau t is the Wiser of the following described tract of laud; ACCORDING TO DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 4124 PASS 527, ONTCT. BEING a tract of land in the Samuel Freeoan Survey, Abstract Mo. 525, situated to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the tract do"rribed its a deed of reeacd in Volume 4124, Page 5271, Do" Rocs, Tarrant County, Texas, *Ad being more particularly described by lest00 and beuis at follows: SEGINNI G at the Southwest corner Ot the abiwe 90949 alI00d tract in the NOW0 line of Lot ,Block 1, of Grog's Country Agwe's, an VNI- tian to the City of Saethlake, as shown an a plat of record in Volww 368-124, PAge 143, Plat Resaris., Tarrant City, Ta►xaa, sai# point being N. 69* - 51' - 3r E. 44.77 feet from the ft0thr rest corner of said Lot 5; TIUME North 223.31 feet to an isea pia in the &Wth line of &01ling Lane for the Northwest comer of the herein described tract; THEME N. 69* - 5h' - 011' E. 369.23 fiat alelag said South line to on iron pin in same for the Northeast corner of the heroin der"s'ibed tract; TOWAICE S. 60 - 01' - 52" E. 222.62 feet to as iron pin for the Seuth> t corner of the hlavoie described tract; E S. Se - 51' - 33" W. to and ale&& the North lisle of said Lot 5 of t re►g's Country Acre's .3b9.35 feet to the PCIM 01r MIMUK and containing Z..Qi? scses. dial THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, Carole M. Tetrault, the uvAW rsignod, doss bereby adopt this plat des ignat t ing the above desc r i bed property nor be known as Lots 1 & 20 N - ft*a w No. 525 Addition, an addition to the City of Southl<lalse, Tarrant County,- Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the use of the public all street-$ cad aaaasents as shown hereon. WITNESS MY NANO this dap of , 1990 Carole M. Tetrault AVIGATION >R$EMfT "0 R+EJISE THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF > ALL NZII >sY THESE FRESZWTS: am .ter WHEREAS, CAROLS M. TETRAULT - ze na ter called •Owner' (whether one or sore), is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in or within the owzraterriteriel jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, being more particularly described hereon for all purposes: NOW, TH11MEFOR19, in consideration Of the sum of ON, AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, owner(s) do(es) hereby wiave, release, quitclaim, and forever hold har4ess the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter call "City", from any and all claims for damage of any kind that Owner(s) say now have or may herein- after have in the future by reason of the passage of all aircraft ("aircraft' being defined for the purposes of this instrument as any contrivance now known or hereinafter, invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air) by whoasoever owned and operated, in the air space above Owner's property, as hereon before described, and above the surface of Owner's property such noises, vibration, fuses, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and Owners do hereby fully having remiss, and release any right or cause of action which it may now have or which it may in the future have against the City, whether such claim be for injury to person or damage to property due to noises. vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all the other effects that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or maintenance of aircraft or aircraft engine at or on said Dallas/Fort north International Airport. It is agreed that this release shall be binding opon the Owner, their heirs and assigns, and successors in interest with.regard to said property located in or in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Tarrant County or Denton County, as appropriate, Texas. Executed this day of 19_ (Owner) STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Carole M. Tetrault, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the forsaoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of 1990. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas. I, Walter W. Ward, the undersigned, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is a true and correct representation of a survey made on the ground. �.. 1 GL-1 �- Date / lam' �� Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2U14. This Plat Filed in Cabinet Slide No Date CHAIRMAN SECRETARY MAYOR SECRETARY WA CCWFANY � � �a Il1Tt t-st t i Appro ved ( Date) CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLANNING 8t ZONING COMMISSION VICINITY MAP SCALE ('= 2000' 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE I"= 50' Approved ( Date) CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 5 15' -�►i Z 5' �+— I bI = W H VOL.388-143 PG.40 Ct �- PRTCT Z _;f I �I m VOL_ 388- 143 I PG. 40 PRTCT WHISPERING LANE ( 50' Right -of- Way ) EAST 290.40 11"7I4�'f]ON F.rl�$t1i14RfIT A� 1tEL1G�SR � , ttafal" or ) XMIN M.16 JIM K 181LS 1111185 fM'!R i w 904TMtor called-oweor- (whether mate or aQee) • is than owner -of that certain panel ON lsed situat" is cc within the oxtrsterritorial jurisdiction of Eb* CAty of flake, Ta TeNt seed Dental Couarti*s, TwMs, betaq s094 parti urLY eelOteLbet0 barge* for all pwr"~, WW, 1XIIIIIIIIII00M, in consideration of the ens of me Am "/lots (lst'40) 0"KA11. and a' :good sad valuable consideration, the >Iroceipt stud atx;IH i Oiam ry of %*iok is b reby *wknsowlodgad and confessed, Owmer f s) *at *$ ) dew ova, tsisase, qMttre:lsia, And forever bold hornless mitt City of . 'Vedas&*, a easaisdpal ratios, bareiaaftov call '°City-, tses' alaisis tens des~y+ rt oal flied that vw wts) mW ew have er aliGw+c have is the tasters by roasow of the passage of all airwrott ( •a# being eelafisdd for the faios rpss of Athis instrument as any contriveae* now hadroa . I5 or havoima>*ts>r, letwaNtt,N. Good, or designed for navigation of or flight fm bl air-) by ++1b*eeuie*rerr cewrtstt and operated, in the aia space above Ow"t's or toy, ale here" 11116 :re 4"Cr bed, #erad above the surface of Owner's property a U640 rs, vLbriotion. fusiao, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, cad all other !! !"aettsa sbat way be esmaed by the operation of aircraft -landing at or taking QktLt frA*, oR oparstiaq at or on th* Dallas/Fort worth int,aroatiowal Airports bad $w wrk do hor4by telly having resiss; and release any right or cause of ssVt�tam wk,ivb It oty now have or which it may in the tutu;* have against the Gi#ty, %*Ab"*et such claim be for injury to person or damage to property dare to eei *aa. vibcotion. fee", dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all the otboy oft,nots that may be caused at mar have been caused by the operatioa of airds;t i 14A&J49 at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or maintoneace of aircraft otr. &troaratt angi.ms at of oa said Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. It is "gored that this release shall be binding opoa the Owner, their buts air# mmi ea, and successor* is interest with regard to said property located. to cc is o ttsatorriltorial jurisdiation of the City of Soutklake, Tarrant Coteaty, ai, sett it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a aev*sant rmu ajAq with Ow lsiwd, apd "all be recorded is the Dead Records of Tarrant 4< 1i004" Co%fty, an arpprapriate, Texas. tts*cuted this ,day of A.D.. r $ (Owner) ri �. -15' �_7.5' io et O 8 �,. o �0 VO L. 388 -143 PG. 40 = PRTCT I 0 I I _I L 15' DRAINAGE 5 UTILITY EASEMENT WEST 290.40 00 25' BUILDING ALINE 6t R 8 7,12 0 S.F. BLOCK I CARROLL INDEPENDENT .SCHOOL DISTRICT VOL.6692 PG. 48 PLAT REVISION LOT 6-R , BLOCK 1, 4 LOT 17 HIGHLAND ESTATES VOL.388-134 PGAOO WHISPERING BELL ESTATES AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 687, BLOCK I, AS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 388 -143 , PAGE 40, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. IN THE C.M.THROOP SURVEY A-1511 SEPTEMBER. 30,1990 OWNER: GLENN & ALOHA PAYNE 1213 Whispering Lone Southleke,Tx. 76092 (617) 491-7134 STATE OF TEXAS CCXJNTY OF TARRANT TMT VINERMi. "o"'ailnrd Alter Ads Payne, are the owners of Lots 6 b 7, Block 1, Whispering Dell Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake,r Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 368-143, Page 44, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, ACCORDING TO DEEDS IN YOL.8067PG.## & VOL.7770 PG. 775, ORTCT. NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS TNkT Clouse mW Aloha Aim - Payne, the undersigned, do her eky a4ept this plat d"i&mting the above described property to be known as W 6-R, Block 1, 141bispering Dell Estates, an .addition to the City of Southl.ake, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate to the use of the public all streets and easeamitats as shown hereon. WITNESS MY HAND this day of , 19%. ` `Z_w Payne Aloha Payne STATE OF TEX" COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, an this day persoesally appeared CAenn aed Aloha Ann Payse, known to me to be the persons whore maces are srbacribed to the foregoing instrument, and ackmmledged to as that they 41111tecuted the omm for the purposes and consideration therein OXWOssed. _"VEX UNDER W NAM AND SEAL OF OFFICE an this day of 19910 . Notary Public to cad 1z W* State of Texas. 1, Walter W. Ward, the undersigned, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is a true and correct oeprosentation of a survey made on the ground. %01 Date ^_C/ eglater Pro ens one n Surveyor No. 2014 ram. , WA1LTER A 2D14 sQ. CHAIRMAN SAC RETA RY MAYOR SECRETARY THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET. SLIDE DATE N 88.47'35" E 17.51 POINT OF BEGINNING Une Q 0 P4 SET T/Y RI vE 212 DELTA = 00.47'20'� RADIUS = ' 2799.79 LENGTH = 38.56' CHORD = 38.56 CH. BRG. = N 89.35'45 ' E F. M. HIGHWAY 1 7 0 9 o - - UTTLEi#wy G HALL SURWY ABSTRACT NO. 6W Swwy Line - - - - -- - EL PADEN SURWY ABSTRACT Na 7255 C�ntwflne of Now P-aK (PROPOSED 130' RIGHT -OF -SPAY) MM 5/. N?CN RM t� N 89.3456" E R.O.P. Reserved for future acquisition by the SDHPT 1264.16' 15' UTILITY EASEMENT T5' UTILITY EA5E)WENT Fouw f 50' BUp ptNG LINE I ' II � it O t0 DELTA = 00.30'06" ' z � RADIUS = , 2799.79 I LENGTH = 24.52' II o CHORD = 24.52' I ' ' I CH. BRG. = N 88 '3232" E I I I TU' UUUTY EASE7ONT ! I I it I ' I � i � II I'3 I w 1 h7 i U7 I I 'O I O I I I � I I I SET ,lz" RQ/ eaiD I; LOT 1 BLOCK 1 I ' I CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL N I (0 Iit 54.6152 GROSS ACRES 1..7222 R.O.W. DEDICATIONI I I i, I 5Van- * 0 NET ACRES I i i I li II 42' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION I 1.7222 ACRES ' (75,021 SQUARE FEET) III I, I I i I I I I � W I'w to t I I O � LO I I � d- I tt- i�0 C3 _ I Z I I� I SET , ' IRON ROD • I , XT 11-r RUN ROD i m I W ; CN I'' J �I� Its V) m 10' UTIUTY EASEMENT I I, I I', I I 31 I I 0 I o O I 10' UnUTY EASEMENT IO Z 'to �42.00` ; , O -------------ei�� "SET - - - ------------------------------ -���--��----���--���----- ' cn SET 1/2" HM ROD , N 89.38'00" W 1326.00' OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WHEREAS, Carroll Independent School District acting through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent according to the Deed recorded in Volume , Page ; is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the R.J. Paden SurveyTi-1255, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract as recorded on Page 557 of Volume 4153 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and W -1 L E being the same tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and the same tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: r BEGINNING in Peytonville Road and being in the South line of F.M. Highway No. 1709 and also being South 00 deg.. 43 min. 50 sec. West a distance of 77.47 feet from the Northwest corner of said R.J. Paden Survey; 0 100 200 THENCE North 88 deg. 47 min. 35 sec. East along the South line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 17.51 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the' i beginning of a curve to the right h.ti;ng a radius of 2799.79 feet whose center Scale 1" = 100' bears South 01 deg. 12 min. 25 sec. East a distance of 2799.79 feet; ``. THENCE Northeasterly along said curve and along the South line of said F.M. Highway No. 1709 and through a central angle of 00 deg. 47 min. 20 sec. a distance of 38.56 feet to a 1/Z '.Ton rod set for corner; THENCE North 89 deg. 34 min. 56 sec. East along the South line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 1264.16 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 05 min. 35 sec. West, a distance of 490.09 feet a 1/2- inch iron rod found at the Northeast corner of said tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 607.74 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 47 min. 05 sec. West at a distance of 539.35 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set at the Northeast corner of said tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 762.15 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. East a distance of 434.32 feet to a 1/2- inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 89 deg. 38 min. 00 sec. West, at a distance of 1326.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner, and being in the centerline of said Peytonville Road; THENCE North 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. West along said centerline of Peytonville Road a distance of 434.20 feet; SURVEYOR'S CE1tTIFIGTE THENCE North 00 deg. 43 min. 50 sec. East along said centerline of Peytonville STATE OF TEXAS Road a distance of 1351.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 54.6152 acres or 2,379,040 square feet with approximately 1.7222 acres or 75,0 21 COUNTY OF TARRANT square feet being dedicated for said Peytonville Road, leaving a net acreage of 52.8930 acres or 2,304,019 square feet of land. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That 1, Geary Bailey, do hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an actual and accurate survey of the land, and that the corner monuments sham That, by and through the undersigned, thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with its duly authorized agent, does ere y adopt this plat designating the the platting rules and regulations of the City Plan Commission of Southlake, hereinatbove described real property as Carroll High School Addition, an Texas. alition to the City of Southlake, T{rrant County, Texas, and I (we) do hereby de icate to the public's use the streets, (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon. WITNESS my (our)' hand(s)-at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the Geary Bai ey day of 1990. Registered Professional Land Swveyor No. 4S73 STATE OF TEXAS Approved COUNTY OF TARRANT Pkmv'arid �� on BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared of a corporation (partnership, V ; own to Ctokmenme o e the persons e se name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said corporation (partnership, JV). secretary Date GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of 1990. Approved Br. f CRY cowma Notary Public Commission expires: M"or Dais Secretary C*10 A FINAL PLA T OF j �- LOT 1 BLOCK " 1 " CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Note: The owners of all corner lots shall SITUATED IN THE maintain sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. R. J. PAD-E-N SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1255 CITY OF SO UTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ARCHITECT SHWC, INC. 5601 MACARTHUR BLVD. P.O. BOX 619087 DALLAS, TEXAS 75261 PHONE (214) 550-0700 54.6152 ACRES November 1990 OWNER: CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1300 N. CARROLL AVE. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS PHONE (817) 481-5775 SURVEYOR: A YRES ASSOCI A TES 2110 WALNUT HILL LANE SUI TE 134 I R VI NG, TEXAS 75038 PHONE (214) 570-5577 • I a in Z10 � 2 < f" N 88.47'35 E 17.51 Z >_ 1 Survey Line POINT OF BEGINNING w N ' N n 32' 1 32' 1 Q 1 0 U wo DELTA = 00.4 7'20" RADIUS = 2799.79' LENGTH = 38.56 CHORD = 38.56 CH. BRG. = N 89.35*45 E F. M. HIGHWAY 1 7 0 J LITTL£BERRY G HALL SUR4£Y ABSTRACT N0. 686 _ — — R.J. PADEN SURVEY ABSTRACT Na 1255 P OP OS D 130' RI T—OF-WAY t..un. roe. awe FouNO s RaN RDD j N 0. s e u c y he HP ' 3 ' — — ��� r �• 1 WON RDD 5' LIN T — — — — 15' U7111TY EASEMENT --- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -� - -- - -------- ---- ----------------- w 50 BUILD G U e� L1 �1 5 Z D LTA 0 `3006', DI = 27,99.7 � � I GT - 24.52 II - 24.52' 8803232" 10 U ENT ZAft li 1 x 1 42, EDI CA 1.7222 A E E-� (7511 021 R ET 1 1 I g oLU i w w � too of LU � d- I O Z1 I SET l/Ir OW IMM I 1 K rrm 0 C 10 542,8930 E'7 .v-?&,rr. C�0 DL 1 I I I -- - --- ----- ---- -- -- --- \ 10' 1 (n WEE 's a . 0 100 200 Scale 1 " = 100' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, Geary Bailey, do hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an actual and accurate survey of the land, and that the corner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with the platting rules and regulations of the City Plan Commission of Southlake, Texas. Geary Bailey Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4573 « "s Mayor Dais Dale Note: The owners of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. OWNS 'S CERTIFICATE WHEREAS, Carroll Independent School District acting through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent according to the Deed recorded in Volume Page is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the R.J. Paden Survey, A-1255, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract as recorded on Page 557 of Volume 4153 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being the same tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and the same tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING in Peytonville Road and being in the South line of F.M. Highway No. 1709 and also being South 00 deg. 43 min. 50 sec. West a distance of 77.47 feet from the Northwest corner of said R.J. Paden Survey; THENCE North 88 deg. 47 min. 35 sec. East along the South line of said f.M. Highway 1709 a distance. of 17.61 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 2799.79 feet whose center bears South 01 deg. 12 min. 25 sec. East a distance of 2799.79 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve and along the South line of said F.M. Highway No. 1709 and through a central angle of 00 deg. 47 min. 20 sec. a distance of 38.56 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 89 deg. 34 min. 56 sec. East along the South line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 1264.16 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 05 min. 35 sec. West, a distance of 490.09 feet a 1/2- inch iron rod found at the Northeast corner -of said tract as recorded on Page 137 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 607.74 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 47 min. 05 sec. West at a distance of 539.35 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set at the Northeast- corner of said tract as recorded on Page 139 of Volume 7244 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 762.15 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. East a distance of 434.32 feet to a 1/2- inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 89 deg. 38 min. 00 sec. lest, at a distance of 1326.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod set for corner, and being in the centerline of said Peytonville Road; THENCE North 00 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. West along said centerline of Peytonville Road a distance of 434.20 feet; THENCE North 00 deg. 43 min. 50 sec. East along said centerline of Peytonville Road a distance of 1351.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 54.6152 acres or 2,379,040 square feet with approximately 1.7222 acres or T5,021 square feet being dedicated for said Peytonville Road, leaving a net acreage of 52.8930 acres or 2,304,019 square. feet of land. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN Bti _ PRESENTS:_ That, by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, does ere y adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described real property as Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and I (we) do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets, (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon. WITNESS my (our) hand(s) at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the day of , 1990. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT SEM ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared of a corporation (partnership,known to me to be the persons w ose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said corporation (partnership, JV). GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of 1990. Notary u is Commission expires: A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOT 1 BLOCK "1" CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION SITUATED IN THE R. J. PADEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1255 CITY OF SOUTHLAK-Mv TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ARCHITECT. SHWC, INC. 5601 MACARTHUR BLVD. P.O. BOX 619087 DALLAS, TEXAS 75261 PHONE (214) 550- 0 700 54.6152 ACRES November 1990 OWNER: CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1300 N. CARROLL AVE. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS PHONE (817) 481-5775 11 SURVEYOR: A YRES ASSOCIA TES 2110 WALNUT HILL LANE SUI TE 134 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 PHONE (214) 570--5577