Loading...
2000-06-20 CC PacketCity of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: City Manager Notes • Consent Items. The consent items scheduled for consideration at the June 20 City Council meeting are summarized below. (A draft agenda for the June 20 meeting and packet information for the consent items are attached for your review.) ➢ Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 00-63, Amending the personnel policies handbook to include the Family Medical Leave Policy. This policy establishes the procedures the City has operated under to comply with the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA ) of 1993. This policy outlines the requirements of the FMLA which allows eligible employees to take job -protected leave for up to 12 workweeks in any 12 months because of the birth or adoption of a child, for a serious health condition of the employee's family, or for a serious health condition of the employee's. The policy also enables an employee on FMLA leave to maintain health benefits while on leave as if the employee had continued to work instead of taking leave. Additionally, an employee generally has a right to return to the same position or an equivalent position with equivalent pay, benefits and working conditions at the conclusion of the leave. Contact Lauren Safranek with questions on this item. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5C. Approval of a professional services agreement with Belcheff & Associates Inc for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the North Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Addition. As part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, the City Council has approved funding for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. A project map for each neighborhood is included in the memo from Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe. Staff has received a proposal from Belcheff & Associates to engineer and design the sanitary sewer for the aforementioned neighborhoods. The proposal totals $48,573, which is below the $62,820 allocated in the CIP budget. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 r Page 2 of 9 The City has polled the residents in Hillside Estates to determine if a majority of the residents support construction of the sewer. Approximately 81% of the residents of Hillside Estates support the installation of the sewer. Funds have been appropriated in the CIP budget to construct the sewer for Hillside Estates. Once the design of the sewer for Hillside Estates is complete, staff will advertise for bids to construct the sewer. Staff has yet to poll the residents along N. Pearson and in the Pecan Acres Addition because the construction of the sewer is not scheduled until the FY00-01. However, staff recommends proceeding with the design of the sewer. Once the residents are polled and if it is determined that a majority of the residents oppose the sewer, Council may choose not to proceed with the construction of the sewer. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5D. Approval of a professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. Each fiscal year, the City Council has approved funding to engineer and construct sanitary sewer to serve certain neighborhoods currently on septic systems as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. The City Council has approved funding to engineer the sanitary sewer to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. There is a project map of each subdivision that is included in the memo by Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe. A professional service agreement has been obtained from Cheatham & Associates in the amount of $47,950 to design the sanitary sewer to serve the aforementioned neighborhoods, which is below the $100,410 appropriated in the CIP budget. The estimated amount included in the CIP budget for the surveying and engineering exceeds the proposed amount from Cheatham & Associates primarily because existing survey information will be utilized that has previously been performed by the engineer for other projects in the areas of the neighborhoods. Overwhelming support exists from the residents in the Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates subdivisions. There is a slight majority of residents that support the sewer in the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 3 of 9 Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. This data is based on surveys performed by the City. The results are tabulated in the memo from Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe. Following the design of the sanitary sewer for these neighborhoods, the City will proceed with the construction of the sewer for Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates. The construction of the sewer for the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition is not scheduled until the FY00-01. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5E. Intentionally blank at this time. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5F. Resolution No. 00-51, Changing terms for Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board members. The Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board functions to advise the Teen Court Program of the needs of each of the represented entities. The City Council discussed changing the terms of the City of Southlake's appointments to the Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board at the May 2' Council meeting. Councilmember DuPre lead the discussion based on her recommendations for this change. The City Council will now vote on changing the term from one year to two-year terms. Contact Monica Broadhurst or Councilmember DuPre with questions on this item. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5G. Ordinance No. 784, Vt Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. During the 76' Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill #601 was passed amending article 102.0172 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to create a Municipal Court Technology Fund by which a defendant would be required to pay a $4.00 fee if convicted of a Class C Misdemeanor offense. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for municipal court. Refer to the memo prepared by Sean Leonard for examples of technological enhancements. Based on the current trend of citation issuance, it is estimated that the collection of this fund could result in the collection of $150,000 to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 4 of 9 $200,000 of revenues to the City before this article expires in September 1, 2005. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5H. Ordinance No. 785, 1" Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. During the 76' Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill #163 was passed amending article 102.011(a)(2) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to increase the fee for executing an arrest warrant from $35.00 to $50.00 per apprehension. The approval and implementation of this fee could result in the collection of an estimated $15,000 to 45,000 per year in additional revenues to the City that would be deposited into the General Fund to assist operating cost (i.e. Warrant officers, court personnel, etc.). Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5I. Ordinance No. 783, l' Reading, Providing for the amendment of Article H of Chapter 8 for the Code of Ordinance relating to Municipal Court of Record. During the 76' Texas Legislative Session, House Bill #731 was passed amending Chapter 30 of the Government Code, which standardized all Municipal Courts of Record within the State of Texas. By law the City of Southlake is required to codify this statute and incorporate all of its uniformed policies and procedures by amending Article H of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances. The City Council has the discretion to set the term limits of the judge(s) to either a two-year or four-year term. The current format of the ordinance provides for a four- year term but Council may change the format to allow for a two-year term. Refer to the memo prepared by Sean Leonard for additional highlights of the ordinance. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5J. Approval of Resolution 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. This resolution is the first step to implement condemnation proceedings for an easement on property owned by Mr. & Mrs. James Haltom. This easement is required in order to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 5 of 9 construct an 18" gravity sanitary sewer line. Once construction of this sewer line is complete, the lift station on N. Carroll at Dove Creek will be abandoned. The lift station currently diverts the sewage from the north drainage basin to the south drainage basin. The City has an agreement with the Trinity River Authority (TRA) that allows diversion of sewage from the north basin to the south basin. The agreement expires in November 2000. The City will be subject to monetary charges every month for each month following November 2000 until the diversion of sewage is eliminated. The proposed 18" gravity sanitary sewer line along Carroll is the last project that has to be constructed to eliminate the diversion. Staff has attempted to meet with the Haltom's on several occasions to discuss the easement to no avail. Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe has had several contacts with Mr. Haltom but has yet to reach an agreement for the easement. Staff will proceed with negotiations with the Haltom's for the next couple of weeks. However, if an agreement cannot be reached staff will have the easement appraised. Once the easement is appraised, the City will file the action to condemn the easement. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5K. Authorize the Mayor to execute a Takeover Agreement for the completion of sanitary sewer improvements in Jellico Estates Addition with Amwest Surety Insurance. The City Council awarded the contract for sanitary sewer installation in Jellico Estates to Everspan Inc. The construction proceeded to the point of almost being complete when the contractor, Everspan, Inc. declared bankruptcy. The city staff has been in communication with the bonding company for the past few months regarding the completion of the contract. The bonding company has submitted a "Takeover Agreement" to the City Attorney to cover the remaining work to be done. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and recommends to the city staff that the agreement be executed so that the surety company can complete the contract. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 6 of 9 This agreement basically just restates the condition parameters of the original contract with Everspan, Inc. There is no additional cost to the City of Southlake for the takeover by the surety to complete the contract. Most of the work to be done is cleanup and "punch list" items. Contact Charlie Thomas with questions. ➢ Agenda Item No. 5L. Authorize the Mayor to execute a developer agreement for Southlake Crossing Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 and 6 (Hobby Lobby). Southlake Crossing Phase II was platted in 1995. It sits on the southeast corner of FM 1709 and Davis Boulevard. It has been developed in phases with Albertson's and others. The last phase is now being developed with the construction of Hobby Lobby. There are public water and sanitary sewer lines to be constructed on site. The site plan for Hobby Lobby was approved on January 18, 2000. In 1995, when the plat was approved, the Park Fee was $500 per acre and the fee did not have to be approved by the Park Board; therefore, there is no Park Board recommendation included with the Developer's Agreement. This is a standard developer's agreement with no special issues. Contact Charlie Thomas if you have questions. • CISD #5 Addition. At the Council meeting last Tuesday night, the Mayor asked Eddie Cheatham if there would be more stormwater run-off downstream after the school was constructed than there is today. Eddie Cheatham answered yes. After the meeting, Charlie Thomas asked Eddie to re -check their hydraulic calculations. Today, Eddie Cheatham faxed the attached letter explaining the hydraulic situation. I thought the Council might like to have this information at this time. Contact Charlie Thomas if you have any questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 7 of 9 • June Retreat. Plans are underway for the June Retreat, scheduled for Monday, June 26 and Tuesday, June 27. Although the Retreat is scheduled primarily to allow the City Council to discuss major projects and plan for the upcoming year, we will be having a brief business meeting on Monday evening to take care of a few development cases that need attention since we will not have a regular Council meeting on July 4. You will receive a Retreat packet next week providing you details, including the location. Note that we are planning to spend a little less time on staff presentations at this Retreat than in previous years. The intention is to give Council more opportunity to discuss your goals and expectations for the year, and to provide some quality time for the City Manager and Council to discuss issues like communication, procedures, and project priorities. In addition to the discussions, we will continue our tradition of providing written reports to you as "text only" items to preview upcoming budget issues. If you have ideas of topics that need to be covered, please give me or Shana Yelverton a call. We are interested in your input -- we want this Retreat to be productive for everyone involved. • Project Prioritization by City Council. Note the attached memo from Greg Last concerning prioritizing of staff projects for the coming year. The time frame is as follows: - June 9 - Distribute draft Master List and PAF forms to Council for review - June 13 - Council to return any recommended revisions to Greg Last - June 16 - Staff gives final forms to Council for ranking - June 20 - Rankings returned to Greg Last - June 23 - Finalized rankings placed in June retreat packets - June 26 & 27 - Discuss rankings at June retreat Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 8 of 9 You will notice that Greg is requesting to have your input by Tuesday, June 13. We apologize for the short turn around, but we wanted to be sure to have the list ready for discussion at your June Retreat. • Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association (GSSA) Donation. At a recent Park Board meeting, Board member Chris Miltenberger discussed an offer by GSSA to purchase a slicer/aerator for Parks maintenance to use in aerating the soccer fields at Bob Jones Park. The fields should be aerated 4-6 times per year, and GSSA wanted to provide the City with the necessary equipment to perform this function. They purchased the $3,600 aerator and gave it to us last month. The slicer/aerator is superior to our existing aerator, and provides some advantages to the conventional aerator. We appreciate GSSA's gift and commitment in working with staff in maintaining our parks. The aerator will also be used on other sports fields and turf areas in our parks system. Contact Kevin Hugman if you have any questions. • Also included with my memo: ❖ Library Board Minutes ❖ Meetings/Events Calendar ❖ AMS ❖ Kudos Staff Extension Numbers: Broadhurst, Monica, Teen Court Coordinator, ext. 840 Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Manager Notes June 9, 2000 Page 9 of 9 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Leonard, Sean, Municipal Court Administrator, ext. 832 Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, ext. 767 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 SENT BY: CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES; 817 265 8532; JUN-9.00 iO:22AM; PAGE 212 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES 8, 7000 y of Southlake Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer T N. Carroll Wake. TX 76092 CJLS.D. — Proposed Elementary Na 5 Clarification of Design Parameters for Proposed Detention Facility Project No. 029-202 it Mr. Thomas, have completed our analysis and design of the proposed detention facility, which will be structed at the future Elementary School No. S. In our initial analysis, we determined that the ghted "C" factor, or amount of m>ervious area which resulted in the conakuction of the posed school was less than the "C factor allocated for this area in the original design done by ter dt Burgess, Inc. Thus, we concluded that the existing drainage system and the �rish+eam ''mprovements already had the available capacity to construct the school without visions for detention. However, upon further consideration. we determined that even though proposed school's runoff would not excel the intended capacity of the Waisting drainage tem, it would be in the best interest of the wbool, and the city, to provide detention faci ities, irder to avoid any potential liability for increasing the runoff downstream. Furthermore, we ided to not only detain the increased runoff due to the construction of the school, but to also nun the maximum amount of runoff that can physically be detained in the existing drainage nnel, without overtopping the channel banks. r proposed design includes minor re -grading of the existing channel, primarily for hteoance requirements, and also the fabrication of a steel plate containing two v notch s, which is to be bolted to the upstream headwall of the existing box culverts. This steel to will meter or provide detention for the 2, 5,10, 25, 50, and 100-year storm events. This al plate will decrease the amount of storm water that is currently being Ararged by the existing box culverts, even prior to the construction of the new school. 'ou have any further questions or comments concerning this project, please contact us. Cheatham, P.E. CARll=Nn7 WYAeMaiw cWflo lmmid Brent Kline. TPM John Kraft, Carroll I.S.D. ENGINEERS a PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and IMsign, Inc. 1601 1. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 - Arlington, Texas 76011 1. 1 817/548-0696 9 Metro 265-8836 9 Fax 817/265.8532 t;ity of boutniaKe, t exas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development SUBJECT: Step 1— Annual Project Prioritization by City Council Action Requested: Evaluate the attached summary of projects for any additions or revisions needed prior to distribution to Council for formal ranking. Background Information: The "Project Prioritization" process has been utilized as a management tool for several years to best match staff work with the priorities of Council. It allows City Council, board members and individual advocates of projects an opportunity to place their item before City Council for collective ranking. This process has provided clear direction to staff as to the Council's desires and has greatly aided in the productivity of staff due to our ability to focus on the higher priorities. Applicable Project Types: This exercise is intended to cover or not cover the following types of projects: YES • Ordinance adoptions or revisions • Master plan adoptions or revisions NO • Capital Improvement / Infrastructure projects • Administrative changes (not requiring Council or board actions) Process: For the benefit of the newly elected Councilmembers and as a refresher, a description of the process is as follows: STEP 1. Determine Items to be Prioritized: This is the item before you presently. Staff compiles a master list of items requiring review by City Council and many times another appointed body such as the Planning and Zoning Commission or Park Board. We are forwarding this list to you as well as the related Project Advocacy Forms (PAF) so that you can review the list to make sure that no item you are interested in has been overlooked. As well, you should look at the PAF forms to ensure that the breadth of discussion regarding each item is to your satisfaction. These forms will be the basis for each Councilmember to review as they prioritize all items. Note that there is a blank PAF form at the end of the packet should an entirely new item be desired. This form can be e-mailed to you if that would be easier than writing on the blank form. Any new items or revisions to PAF forms need to be returned to Grea by Tuesday, June 13. 2. Distribute Revised Forms to Council for Ranking: Staff will revise (if needed) the master list as well as the individual PAF forms, add any new items that might be requested, and distribute to each Councilmember the master list and PAF forms. Each Director will also provide a list of recommended priorities for the items within their department as another reference. We will ask each Councilmember to rank all projects listed, e.g. if there are 50 projects there should be 10 number 1's, 10 number 2's, 10 number 3's, 10 number 4's, 10 number 5's. 3. Calculation of Priorities: Staff will take the rankings provided by each Councilmember and mathematically rank all items. The results of the ranking will be distributed to Council in the June retreat packet and will be discussed at the June retreat. At that time the Council can concur with the findings or modify as a group as deemed necessary. In summary the timing is as follows: June 9 - Distribute draft Master List and PAF forms to Council for review June 13 - Council to return any recommended revisions to Greg June 16 - Staff gives final forms to Council for ranking June 20 - Rankings returned to Greg June 23 - Finalized rankings placed in June retreat packets June 26 + 27 - Discuss rankings at June retreat Financial Considerations: None Citizen Input/ Board Review: Citizens, board members and any interested parties are allowed to submit a Project Advocacy Form (PAF) for consideration by Council. Legal Review: None Alternatives: Staff would be glad to pursue alternative management tools if suggested. However, the current process has been extremely effective in matching Council's desires with staff's efforts for several years. Supporting Documents: Attached you will find the following information. • Master Schedule / Status Report of all projects. • Project Advocacy Forms for all projects on master schedule as noted. • Blank PAF form for any new projects. Staff Recommendation: Continue to utilize the "Project Prioritization" system for matching Council's desires to staff work efforts. We realize that the time frames for your review are tight but our goal is to have the City Council rankings calculated prior to the June Retreat so we can include the final priorities in the June Retreat packet and discuss at the retreat. We appreciate your cooperation in providing timely responses. Feel free to contact any department director or the staff contact shown on the PAF form to discuss an item or find out additional information. PLEASE RETURN ANY RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO THE MASTER LIST OR NEW PAF FORMS TO GREG LAST BY TUESDAY. JUNE 13. Greg Last Ph: (817) 481-5581, ext. 750 Fax: (817) 251-9051 N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORrMpri-8mem.doc Im Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities Status Report High —Low Dept Item Comp Enc Results Rank Score 1 2 314 5 4 3 ENG Drainage Ordinance Revisions Comment: Intend to begin after elections. 80% Yes 2 1.43 5 1 1 CS Sidewalk / Trail Implementation Plan Comment: In conjunction with TSMP update. 10% Yes 2 1.43 6 1 CM Citywide Strategic Plan 50% Yes 5 1.57 4 2 1 90% Yes 5 1.57 3 1 2 1 ED Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy Comment: Significant research collected. Priority has been the Kirkwood Road Closure issue. Will hopefully begin after elections and Kirkwood resolution. 20% Yes 7 2.14 3 2 1 1 PL City -Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update Comment: Staffpreparation complete, pending workgroup direction 70% HOLD Yes 8 2.29 2 1 4 PL Hotel / Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance Comment: Staff completed first draft, waiting on establishing a workgroup. 25% Yes 8 2.29 2 3 1 1 ENG Underground utilities 70% Yes 8 2.29 1 2 41 CM Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 50% HOLD Yes 11 2.43 4 2 1 ENG Utility Placement Ordinance 70% Yes 12 2.57 3 3 1 PL Zoning Ordinance - Front Yard Issues (workgroup) 10% Yes 13 2.71 2 4 1 PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No. 484 90% Yes 13 2.71 3 1 2 1 CM Southlake Historical Commission 50% Yes 13 2.71 1 1 4 1 ENG Storm Water Utility District: 80% Yes 17 2.86 1 1 3 2 CS Youth Master Plan Development: 0% Yes 17 2.86 1 5 1 ENG Street Standards Ordinance (Ord. 217) 75% Yes 19 3 2 21 2 1 PS/PL Emergency Preparedness Notification Program 80% Yes 19 3 1 41 2 PS/PL Revise Landscape Ordinance to include bufferyards etc. 0% Yes 19 3 3 1 41 ENG Street Light Standards (separated from lighting stds above) 0% Yes 22 3.14 2 1 1 3 CS/PL Trail System Master Plan Update 20% Yes 22 3.14 4 3 PL Zoning Ord: Reduce Residential PUD Min. Acreage (land conservation revision) Comment: On hold per request of workgroup. 50% HOLD Yes 24 3.29 1 2 1 3 PL Zoning Ordinance 480-V - Misc. Clean-up Items Phase I 80% Yes 24 3.29 1 2 31 1 ENG Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 70% Yes 24 3.29 2 2 2 1 PW Septic Ordinance 25% Yes 24 3.29 2 4 PL Zoning Ordinance - Special Events Permit & Procedures Comment: Staff has completed first draft 80% Yes 28 3.33 Dent Leeend: PW = Public Works, ENG = Engineering, PL = Planning, CS = Community Services, CM = City Manager, SEC = City Secretary, FI = Finance, PS = Public Safety, HR = Human Resources, ED = Economic Development Master Schedule - City Council Project Priorities Draft: June 9, 2000 3:32 PM Page 1 of A Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities Status Report High —Low Results Dept Item % Comp PAF Enc. 1 2345 Rank Score 1 2 1 3 CS Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan 75% Yes 29 3.43 Comment: In conjunction with Parks Master Plan update and Bob Jones Development 1 1 3 2 PL Amortization of Certain Non -Conforming Uses (on hold) 50% Yes 30 3.57 Comment: ZBA orientation /procedures completed by staff, awaiting city attorney's review and council direction. 1 31 11 2 CM I Open Records Ordinance 15% Yes 30 3.57 1 1 3 2 PL Michael Drive Initiative (Direction from CC on 12-1-98) 90% Yes 32 3.71 Comment: Staff completed 90% of required preparation before HOLD Caffey pulled out. Pending Council direction. 31 31 1 PS Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 5% Yes 32 3.71 1 2 1 31 PS Sign Ordinance Revisions (704-B) Open House Signs 0% Yes 34 3.86 2 3 21 CS Clean Streets / Beautiful City Project: 0% Yes 35 4 1 3 3 PL Zoning Ordinance - SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial 5% Yes 36 4.14 Districts Comment: Idea has not been supported by PZ or CC in past. 1 3 3 CS Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan: 40% Yes 36 4.14 1 2 4 CM All America City Award in 2000 0% Yes 38 4.29 Comment: Committee chose not to apply. HOLD 1 1 5 CM Rules of the City Council 0% Yes 39 4.57 The following items have been asked for or approved by Councilmembers but have not been prioritized by City Council CMO Trash pick-up contract review (PD): 0% 1 Yes PL Revise Multi -Family Requirements (DE) 0% Yes PL Revise Manufactured Housing Requirements (DE) 0% Yes PS? Write grading (earth moving) ordinance (DE) 0% Yes ENG Revise Flood Plain Ordinance (DE) 0% Yes PL Ord. 480-M revising noise standards 80% Comment: Staff'preparation and City Attorney review complete, waiting on discussion at CC on 6-6-00, consideration by PZ on 6-8-00 PL Ord. 480-LL, revising outside storage / screening regulations 0% PL Growth management study 85% Comment: Final report pending in workgroup PL Thoroughfare Plan Amendment: Peytonville / Shady Oaks 25% connection HOLD Comment: On hold at Council (work group to be formed of area residents) Dent Leeend: PW = Public Works, ENG = Engineering, PL = Planning, CS = Community Services, CM = City Manager, SEC = City Secretary, FI = Finance, PS = Public Safety, HR = Human Resources, ED = Economic Development Master Schedule - City Council Project Priorities Draft: June 9, 2000 3:32 PM Page 2 of 4 The following are projects that are anticipated to come before Council at the next ranking in June Recommended By Dept. Item % Comp PAF ? Park Board CS/PL Ord. 483-I, Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing park dedication requirements. 40% No Park Board CS Ord. 774, Amending Trail system Master Plan to require all trails to be 8 feet in width 60% No Ken Horne PL Elimination of perimeter walls and fences around residential subdivisions in low density areas along arterial roadways. 0% Yes Rex Potter PS Residential lighting standards review 0% No M. Jackson PS Elevator Ordinance 0% No M. Jackson PS Substandard Bldg. Ordinance 0% No M. Jackson PS High Grass / Weeds Ordinance 0% No M. Jackson PS Adoption of 2000 Building Codes 0% No Patsy Dupre PS False Alarm Ordinance 0% No Rick Black PS Uniform Fire Code 0% No N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PRI-RNK-12.doc Note: If you would like to request a Project Advocacy Form (PAF) in anticipation of the request for projects in June, please contact Greg at 481-5581, x750 or E-mail: glast@ci.southlake.tx.us NO Legend: PW = Public Works, ENG = Engineering, PL = Planning, CS = Community Services, CM = City Manager, SEC = City Secretary, FI = Finance, PS = Public Safety, HR = Human Resources, ED = Economic Development Master Schedule - City Council Project Priorities Draft: June 9, 2000 3:32 PM Page 3 of 4 Following are Completed Projects from Previous Priority Schedules Dept CC Rank Item Date Approved by Council PS N/A Revise Tree Ordinance PS 1.57 Lighting Standards PL N/A Ord. 480-JJ, revisions to impervious coverage and landscaping regulations January 18, 2000 PL N/A Ord. 480-II, regulations for non-residential carports and parking garages February 1, 2000 PL 1.14 Ord. 480-HH, outside storage and screen revisions February 15, 2000 PL N/A Ord. 480-GG, revisions regarding lights, lighting, and glare September 7, 1999 PL N/A Ord. 483-H, changes in administrative processing of concept lans develo ment plans, site plans, and definitions May 18, 1999 PL N/A Ord. 731 & Ord. 480-EE, Sexually -oriented businesses February 2 1999 PL N/A Thoroughfare Plan Amendment: Nolen Drive, SH 114 to Crooked Lane PL 1.14 Zoning Ordinance - Outside Storage Issues All 2.71 Im act fee update PW 2 Drainage Master Plan Phase I: Inventory and data assembly Phase II: West Jones Branch Study Area Phase III: South Fork Kirkwood Branch Study Area PS/ED NA Landscape Ordinance Revisions Estimated June, 1999 CS 4.43 Park Dedication Ordinance - Fee Justification Study Aril 6, 1999 PS N/A Excavation Ordinance #693-A February 16, 1999 PL 3.0 Sexually Oriented Business Ord. No. 731 February 2 1999 PL/PS N/A Sign Ordinance Revisions Ord. No. 704-A December 1, 1998 CMO 3.43 Smoking Ordinance November 17 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance 480-BB: Impervious Coverage October 20, 1998 PS 3.71 Health and Sanitation Ordinance October 20 1998 PR 1.57 Land Acquisition Plan for Ultimate Build -out of Park System September 28 1998 PR 1.25 Update of Parks and Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Presented to SPDC and Pk Board joint Meeting September 28 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance Revision: Ordinance 704 September 1, 1998 PL/PS 1.57 Zoning Ordinance 480-CC: Residential Adjacency Standards (Neighboring Preservation Ord. also addressed parking issue July 21, 1998 PL 1.00 Com rehensive Land Use Plan Update January 20 1998 PL 2.33 Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A December 16, 1997 PL/CS 2.50 Sidewalk Ordinance December 16, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord. 480-Z Service Station Regulation) August 19, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord. 480-Y(Personal Care Facilities July 1, 1997 PL 2.00 Subdivision Ordinance — Park Dedication Provisions July 1 1997 PL 2.67 Subdivision Ord. Thoroughfare References & Misc. June 17, 1997 CMO 3 Ordinance Codification Administrationportion) March 14, 1997 PL 1.00 Master Thoroughfare Plan Update March 4, 1997 PL 1.67 ZoningOrd. 480-W Telecommunication Towers & Antennas February 4, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord. 480-X(Revisions to PUD density calculations February 4, 1997 PR 1.75 Master Plan for Bob Jones Park November 19, 1996 PR 2.00 Master Plan for Bicentennial Park November 19, 1996 Dept Legend: PW = Public Works, ENG = Engineering, PL = Planning, CS = Community Services, CM = City Manager, SEC = City Secretary, FI = Finance, PS = Public Safety, HR = Human Resources, ED = Economic Development Master Schedule - City Council Project Priorities Draft: June 9, 2000 3:32 PM Page 4 of 4 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: _ Drainage Ordinance No. 605 TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Scott Martin and Debra Edmondson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas DATE OF REQUEST: June 5, 1998 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. We must mitigate the massive amount of new additional run-off which will be generated by the 200% to 300% increase in the impervious coverage from the expansion of S.H. 114 and its associated interchanges and "Fly-overs", the expansion of F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938, as well as the plethora of new commercial development associated with these three corridors. 2. We must eliminate the filling of or building within the "Flood Plains" of our city in order to protect the downstream properties. 3. We must mitigate the run-off of toxic materials such a g s motor oil, hydraulic fluid, brake fluid, antifreeze, etc., from roadways, highways, parking lots, driveways, etc., in order to protect and prevent contamination of our underground water table, as well as our streams, ponds, and lakes and their associated wildlife. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. General Comments: These efforts should "dovetail" or pre-empt the Corp of Engineers, E.P.A. and the T.N.R.C.C. in regards to their anticipated new requirements/regulations in regards to the above listed concerns. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 1.1 N.\ECONDEV\PROJECFS\PRIORnWROJ-REQ.FRM\DR-ORD02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Sidewalk Trail Implementation Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kim Lenoir for SPDC & Park Board Members STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services, 481-5581, ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) To prepare a plan for implementing trail and sidewalk construction per the master plan. Much like the sewer program. 2. 3. (aw = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Trail and sidewalk construction should be tied into CIP for street construction. 2. Develop implementation plan in consent with planned Trail System Master Plan updated scheduled for 1999. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N:\ECONDEVIPROJECTS\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\SIDE-af3.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Citywide Strategic Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager, 481-5581, ext. 705 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Note: It is staff s intent with this project to begin anew after receiving feedback from the citizen survey and completion of the upcoming elections. This will allow clear feedback and direction regarding this topic. Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Ensure that the community, elected officials and staff are moving forward with a shared vision. 2. Create a forum for making informed decisions when setting budget priorities or deciding when setting budget priorities or deciding among program alternatives. 3 List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) Process should include community, elected officials, staff. 2. General Comments: Process has begun, but report needs to be inclusive of new Council members. May wish to consider updated survey data. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 91 N:\ECONDEVWROJECTS\PRIORnWROJ-REQ.FRM\STRATEGIC PLAN-02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: City Council CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: DATE OF REQUEST: May 4, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) Existing policy may not clearly articulate the type and quality of entities we desire 2. Existing policy may not clearly request adequate information that council and staff need for proper review and consideration 3. (W List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) May desire clearer definition of criteria such as employment levels, investment levels, required infrastructure, and impact on the community such as environment and housing 2. May desire inclusion of a formal application 3. General Comments: As the city anticipates an increase in commercial development along S.H. 114, we would like to provide a policy that clearly describes the entities and investment we desire. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Staff contacted over 45 communities within the DFW Metroplex to survey if they have a current tax abatement policy. Further, staff has reviewed the policies of 22 communities and Tarrant County for comparative purposes, and has also contacted the City of Austin. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FQ-ES\PROJECfS\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\tax-policy-Ol.doc Form Date: May 14, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: City Initiated Rezonings TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Ronnie Kendall, City Councilmember STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Potential for development to occur on tracts currently zoned more intensively than might be desired. 2. Less control on already zoned tracts. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. A list of zonings which do not conform to the 1998 LUP recommendations was included in the data accumulated for the 1998 LUP update. 2. Look at all properties zoned "C-3" to see if "C-2" or "C-l" would be more appropriate to the intensive uses of the surrounding areas. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 1.1 N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORMVROJ-REQ.FRM\REZONE02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM N A SHORT TITLE: HOTEL/MOTEL REGULATIONS TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Greg Last, Community Development Director CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Art Wright, Zoning Assistant DATE OF REQUEST: 12/98 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. To establish regulations to insure quality hotel developments in Southlake 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Proximity of restaurants, shopping, services, etc. 2. Permit hotels in certain districts by Specific Use Permit. 3. Bed and Breakfast establishments BY: General Comments: General desire is to insure quality commercial growth, particularly along the SH 114 corridor where more regional types of services might be provided. We want to be able to assure potential corporate relocations that only hotels of a certain standard would be constructed along the corridor in order to maintain a professional image for the corridor. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. In N:\ECONDEV\PRO]ECfS\PR1ORITY\PRO)-REQ.FRMUiOTEU.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Under ound Utilities TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Baron Rittiner (817) 491-3939 CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: Citizen STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper, Director of Enaineerin DATE OF REQUEST: 3/22/99 DATE RECEIVED: 4-15-99 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Visual pollution. 2. Proliferation of overhead utility cables and poles - see Kimball Avenue and S.H. 114 (NW corner). 3. Lack of maintenance of utility poles - crooked, leaning - see south side of S.H. 114 between Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Total cost of relocating overhead utilities over a 25-35 year period of rapid growth would exceed cost to bury. 2. Dual certification - TU/Tri-County guarantees that Southlake will have a much worse problem over time than surrounding cities. General Comments: Long term visual and aesthetic impact of overhead utilities will have a significant negative economic impact. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Flower Mound - F.M. 2499 - overhead utilities moved underground. b. April 97 - breakfast with Curtis Hawk to discuss this issue. C. Shawn Poe is researching S.H. 114 utility easements. PC L:\COMDEV\WP-FQ.ES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\under-02..doc Form Date: June 08, 1999 Page 1 of 2 § 4.11 City of Flower Mound Underground Utilities (a) Electric/utility lines. From and after the 5`h day of June, 1995, single phase electrical utility lines and wires 25KV or less shall be placed underground, subject to the following provisions: (1) Where electrical service is to be placed underground, telephone service, cable television service, and street and site lighting lines shall also be placed underground. (2) Each of the utility companies shall be responsible for developing administrative policies and cost reimbursement procedures for the installation and extension of their underground utilities. Nothing herein shall prohibit or restrict any utility company from recovering the difference in cost of overhead facilities and underground facilities in accordance with the provisions of such utility company's approved tariff. No utility company shall be required to begin construction of underground facilities unless and until the customer, owner, developer, and/or party requesting such facilities has made arrangements satisfactory to the specific utility company for the payment of such difference between the cost of overhead utilities and underground facilities. (3) All electrical, telephone, and cable television support equipment (transformers, amplifiers, switching devices, etc.) necessary for underground installation shall be pedestal and/or pad mounted or placed underground and the difference in cost of such facilities shall be paid to the installing utility in accordance with provisions established in subsection (2) above. (4) In those cases where temporary overhead service is necessary (e.g. emergency repairs, construction field offices, etc.), these installations shall not be in service for a period exceeding six (6) months. (5) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require an existing overhead facilities to be placed underground or to prohibit the upgrading, reconstruction, or reconductoring of any existing facilities with overhead construction. (6) Exceptions to the standards contained herein may be granted by the Town Council subsequent to a public hearing. (b) Marking the water and sewer utilities. All water and sewer construction installed underground by the owner and/or developer or contractor shall be clearly marked at a point where service lines are stubbed out so that said lines can be easily located for connection by the Town L:\,COMDEVIWP-FRM\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRMWnderA2..doc Form Date: June 08, 1999 Page 2 of 2 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Commercial Dumpster Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component_, Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX, OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Many of the commercial customers are not using dumpsters, rather, they set out their garbage as if they were a residential customer. this leads to a large number of plastic bags, etc., placed on the roadway in areas such as FM1709. 2. In the residential neighborhoods, builders pile up the scrap material and other waste, to be removed later. Not only is this unsightly, with the wind this is a problem with paper and other such debris being blown about the area. J 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. General Comments: Requiring all commercial customers to use a dumpster, and requiring homebuilders to use a dumpster (which could perhaps be shared in subdivision where houses are being constructed next door to each other, would go a long way in cleaning up our City. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECfS\PRIORrrYTR01-REQ.FRMICOMDUMP2.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page I of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Utility Placement Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Location of improvements to public utilities within the City. 2. Lack of communication with Franchise holders (other utility companies). 3. Large number of utilities in City ROW. (W = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Telecommunications Act may have impacted this area of control. 2. Utility companies have individual franchise agreements. 3. General Comments: Many meetings have been held with the utility companies jointly and individually. Utility companies do not want more regulations. City staff has received more cooperation since discussions started on a new ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTSWRIORr"ROJ-REQ.FRWU rEM PLACEMENT-02.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page I of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Correcting inconsistencies between "Frontage," "Front Yard," "Lot Frontage" TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New _, Minor Revision _, Major Revision X Type: Ordinance Master Plan Component Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Corner lots require front yard setback on each street frontage. 2. Ordinance requires "front" of the lot to be the lot line along the street which has the least dimension. 3. Builders want the flexibility to choose which street to front. 4. These inconsistencies have caused addressing and permitting problems. 5. There are a growing number of "flag or panhandle lots" being submitted as infill properties are being developed. 6. Better define where lot width is measured. (Staff s interpretation: measured at the minimum front yat setback). 7. Establish a minimum lot width for non-residential lots. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Consider adding a development regulation for "Side Yards Adjacent to Street" like PUD's have in their regulations. 2. Establish minimum criteria for approval of flag lots (e.g., maximum number of lots, maximum acreage, etc.). 3. Consider reducing the minimum lot width of cul-de-sac lots to 85' instead of the required 100' for residential lots so that only the minimum required front setback is shown on the plat. 4. Revise yard definitions to better evaluate the appropriate setbacks, especially on irregularly -shaped lots. 5. Determine whether adequate lot frontage is achieved by the lot abutting a public street or by accessing a public street by means of a common access easement. If the lot does not have to abut a public street, how are the required setbacks established... where are the front, side, and rear yards of the lot? General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A N.\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRIMFRONT-04.DOC File Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Noise Ordinance Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New_, Minor Revision XX , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Paul Ward, Building Official, 481-5581, ext. 755 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Provisions are needed for measuring noise in area covered by Noise Control Ordinance. 2. Add section on standards for noise control to give a clear definition of noise violations. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Establish standards to assist those responsible for the enforcement of noise control. 2. Standards as it pertains to noise violations: Tools, instruments, examples How to measure. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Grapevine b. Existing Ordinance No. 484 C. Plano (W N..\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORHWROJ-REQ.FRMWOISE-03.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page i of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Southlake Historical Commission TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: City Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton, Assistant Ci1y Manager DATE OF REQUEST: 2-2-99 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: A formal program to preserve Southlake history is needed as the "human resources" currently available to document historical events and places diminish within our community. 2. Effort would need to be coordinated with Southlake Historical Society. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. R N:\ECONDEVIPROJECTS\PRIORITYWROJ-REQ.FRM\SLHIST02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page I of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Storm Water Utility District TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Need method of financing drainage improvements besides property tax. BY: 2. Storm Water Master Plan is being developed which will define the drainage needs by basin and by creek branch. 3. (W = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Surrounding cities have already instituted such a drainage district. 2. 3. General Comments: Storm Water Utility District would also finance the engineering for the Master Plan along with capital improvements and maintenance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Cities of Grapevine, Keller, Colleyville all have such districts. b. N:\ECONDEV\PROJF.CI'S\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRM�SMRM2.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Youth Master Plan Development TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: City Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman DATE OF REQUEST: 2-3-98 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. Youth programs offered in Southlake are good and SYAC is at a point where it could really take off, but we have not yet undertaken a focused and organized approach to determine the types of programs and services we need to offer children, youth and families. There is currently no formal road map guiding the community for youth initiatives. 2. Through SYAC, the Youth Park Board and Southlake Parks and Recreation Board, the Drug & Alcohol Committee, local school districts and other community groups, the City of Southlake ha: an extensive community network of citizens (both youth and adults) to actively provide input into the development of a youth master plan. These groups also provide a framework through which services and programs could be offered. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) A broad cross-section of the Southlake community should be involved in the development of the plan. 2. The plan could be very expansive or limited in scope, but would probably require the appointment of a citizen steering committee to guide the process. 3. Strong coordination would be needed to ensure existing resources are involved and active in the process. The development of a Youth Master Plan should be a comprehensive effort. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. 14> N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\YOUTH02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 2 a. ICMA award -winning plans from Claremont, CA and Corpus Christi, TX 24 N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\'RIORITY\PROI-REQ.FRWYOtITH02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 2 of 2 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Street Standards Ordinance (Revision to Ordinance 217) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Street construction materials have changed. 3. Opportunity to develop a "Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Construction standards -- i.e., materials, testing methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG b. TxDOT N:IECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORrnVROJ-REQ.FRM\STREETS2.DOC Form Date:Maroh 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (W SHORT TITLE: Emergency Preparedness Notification Program TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: Ronnie Kendall CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Director Campbell DATE OF REQUEST: May 18, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 18, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Inadequate emergency warning notification system 0 3. (W = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Capital outlays and maintenance costs 2. Consider methods of notification for both indoor and outdoor systems 3. Clarity of incident and appropriate actions for the populations affected by incident. General Comments: To decide what percentage of population desired to reach. Consider more than one option if one notification system does not meet this percentage. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Emergency Management Plan N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\emergency-01.DOC Form Date: May 20, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Landscape Ordinance Revisions / Consolidation TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development CC _, P&Z , ZBA , PB ,STAFF xx , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator DATE OF REQUEST: May 24, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 24, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Architects, Developers and Builders often review either the Landscape Ordinance or Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance and fail to realize that there are other landscape requirements. 2. List any potentialconsiderations. (Donot define solution) 1. Consider consolidating the Landscape Ordinance and Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance into a single document. 2. General Comments: To reduce confusion, Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance can be added to the Landscape Ordinance and any needed references in the zoning ordinance can indicate that developers shall comply with the Bufferyard requirements as outlined in the Landscape Ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. None N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRMUandsc-03.DOC Form Date: May 24, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM ` SHORT TITLE: Street Light Standards Ordinance �r TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Pamela Muller STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas, Deputy Director of Public Works DATE OF REQUEST: 1-30-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-30-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Control glare. 2. Enhance country atmosphere of community, while providing safe lighting. 3. Driving safety, provide visibility without blinding lights. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) l . Limit candlepower. 2. Shield light direction. 3. Floodlights, searchlights. General Comments: Take into consideration zoning categories, light direction, parking lots, buildings, athletic stadiums/fields, parks. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Town of Kennebunkport b. City of Plano (W c. Maine study N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\ST-LrM.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Trail System Master Plan Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kim Lenoir for SPDC STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hultman, Director of Community Services, 481-5581, ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) l . Per City Charter, the Trail System Master Plan needs to be reviewed and updated in four years. It was adopted in August 1995; therefore, by August 1999 the revisions should be completed. So by Fall 1998 this project should begin. 2. 3. List an potential considerations. Do not define solution YP ( ) 1. With recent development, P&Z needs further refinement and guidance as to which side of the road trails will be located. (Done - Trail System Master Plan with quidelines approved July 7, 1998.) 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 13 N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\TSMP-UP3.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Residential PUD - Reduction in Minimum Acreage Requirement (Land (W Conservation District) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Councilmembers Scott Martin, Gary Fawks, Pam Muller (Ex-councilmember) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. Infill properties (less than 50-acres in size) have presented certain development challenges, such as lotting configuration, access, street alignments, screening and buffering, etc. 2. Appears to be a need for flexibility in infill development. (W = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. The amount of dedicated open space needs to be reviewed. Currently, the ordinance requires a minimum of 10% for properties being developed residentially. 2. General Comments: Staff supports this concept; however, we recommend that the R-PUD not be reduced below 5 or 10 acres. Currently, R-PUD's require a minimum of 50 acres. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Limited research has been completed. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECCS\PR[ORMMROJ-REQ.FRM\RPUD-AC4.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance (Revisions to Ord. 217) lqw TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Water and sewer construction materials have changed. 3. Opportunity to develop a "Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. Construction standards -- i.e., materials, testing, construction methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG Standards b. TxDOT Standards N:IECONDEVIPROJECTS\PRIORMVROJ-REQ.FRM\UTIUTY POLICY-02.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (r SHORT TITLE: Septic Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Gary Fawks CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Septic systems in an urban residential setting and to saturate the soils thereby causing runoff. 2. 3. (W List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Tarrant County Public Health Dept. serves as the city's provider of this service. 2. One acre lots can have "on -site" disposal system. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECrS\PRIORrrYVROJ-REQ.FRM\SEM1C-04.DOC Form Date: March 29, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Special Events Permit and Procedures TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 5/97 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. Currently we have no process whereby special events (school carnivals, retail promotions, art festivals, etc.) can be approved. 2. Town Square development references the issuance of Specific Use Permits for special outdoor events. The discussion at the time was that the ordinance would be amended to create a SUP for such events. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Need to address length of permit, frequency of permits, hours of operation, alcoholic beverage sales, parking, lighting, signage, traffic management issues 2 General Comments: I would suggest that for certain of these events that the Council consider amending the accessory use section and establish certain criteria for Staff approval of these permits, like the tent permit for retail sales. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Research in progress. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECfS\PRIORrrY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\SPECIAL3.DOC Foan Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: Type: Other: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services Director DATE OF REQUEST: March 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Recent land acquisition opportunities adjacent to Bob Jones Park have significantly altered the original park boundaries. 2. Develop a new park master development plan to include these areas. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECI'S\PRIORrrYVROJ-REQ.FRM\BOBJONEI.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Amortization of Certain Uses TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component_, Project Other: Process for the Board of Adjustment REQUESTED BY: City Council STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/25/96 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The property at the northwest corner of Highland and SH 114 2. The pool chemical facility in East Haven Addition along Continental BY: List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Will require budgeting professional services for a forensic accountant to evaluate the business records of the affected companies. 2. Will require a great deal of the city attorney's time monitoring the Board of Adjustment proceedings. General Comments: We have discussed the amortization of these uses in the past. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 0 C. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITP\PROJ-REQ.FRMWMORTIZ2.DOC March 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Open Records Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Curtis E. Hawk, Cily Manager, 481-5581, ext. 702 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Southlake's ordinance was established in 1987. It does not follow state statutes nor necessarily represent current needs; e.g., cost for copies, etc. 2. Update records ordinance to address procedure for processing open records requests. 3. (W = List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Needs to follow state statutes. 2 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. N.\ECONDEVWROJECfS\PRIORMVROJ-REQ.FRM\OPENRECI.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: MICHAEL DRIVE INITIATIVE TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: Program REQUESTED BY: Barbara Claffey, Direction given by City Council on 12-1-98 CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator DATE OF REQUEST: December 1, 1998 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Historically has been an area of significant code enforcement issues. BY: KPG 2. Landowners unwilling / unable to expend funds for upgrades due to inability to acquire zoning matching the existing uses. 3. Significant issues with dust and noise on site. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) Look at resolving existing landowner problems as well as adjacent homeowner problems. 2. General Comments: Will require significant effort on staff s part as a facilitator / coordinator: • Assist in preparation of adequate zoning (uses, existing conditions, etc.) • Help coordinate diverse interests List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. L� C. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORrrYVRO1-REQ.FR"IKE-01.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page I of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Parade and Street Closure Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Gary Gregg, Deputy Director of Police Services DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Expanding city coupled with civic pride will increase requests for parades and street closures. 2. Differing opinions and groups will be requesting permission to parade in downtown. 3. Need mechanism to regulate othern than SUP. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Establish ordinance to regulate parades and street closings. 2. Low or no fee for neighborhoods. 3. Public Works review, DPS review, Code Enforcement review process. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Fort Worth b. Arlington c. Dallas and other ordinances N:\ECONDEVTROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\PARADEI.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Sign Ordinance Revisions (704-B) Open House Signs TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Debra Edmondson, City Councilmember STAFF CONTACT: Stefanie Sarakaitis, Comprehensive Planner, 481-5581, ext. 753 DATE OF REQUEST: March 19, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: 1. Local Realtors have expressed frustration with an inability to properly advertise "Open Houses" due to the limited number of signs allowed to be placed by the Sign Ordinance. They cannot attract drive -through traffic. 2. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Southlake residents may feel limited in their ability to properly market and sell their homes. This may place an unintended hardship on our residents - similar to the "Garage Sale" sign issue. 2 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. M. C. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORnWROJ•REQ.FRM\SIGN3.DOC March 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM . SHORT TITLE: Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: Ci y Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hultman DATE OF REQUEST: 2-2-99 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: Trash accumulation on streets and in bar ditches significantly deters from the attractiveness of the city. 2. In connection with the establishment of entry portal sites, the City of Southlake should look for (W opportunities for beautification projects (i.e., Wal Mart strip), tree planting demonstration programs, etc. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Coordination with KSB and other community groups 2. Identification of code enforcement issues. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECfS\PRIORrnVROJ-REQ.FRM\CLEANS77.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page I of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: SUP for Commercial Uses in Industrial Districts (amendment to Zoning Ord.) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Developers & Land Owners in Commerce Business Park STAFF CONTACT: GregLast or Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 3/98 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) BY: GL There are multiple uses within the light industrial park that could benefit from the ability to have a small retail component. 2. It might allow businesses to grow within Southlake and remain in Southlake. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: There appear to be two options, create a mixed use business district or amend the existing SUP (#31) and increase the allowed percentage of retail in the designated districts. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. L� C. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORMITROJ-REQ.FRM\SUP-INDI.DOC Form Date:March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services Director DATE OF REQUEST: March 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Review master plan concept and revise to incorporate unanticipated land acquisitions and as -built park components. 2. Review maintenance facility layout, access roads, and future park facility needs. 3. L = List an potential considerations. o not define solution YP � ) 1. 01 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. n 13 L C. N:\ECONDEVIPROJECTS\PRIORITY\PRO1-REQ.FRM\BICENNI.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: All America City Award in 2000 TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: City Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager DATE OF REQUEST: 2-2-99 DATE RECEIVED: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Opportunity to obtain All America City designation from National Civic League BY: 2. Award criteria favors community endeavors, as opposed to city, government -led endeavors. A community task force, whose mission it would be to identify projects for submission, prepare application, and present information to NCL if selected as a finalist, could increase our chances of receiving the award. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Task force would need to evaluate projects for possible inclusion in the application. 2. Task force would need to receive training on the award program, application preparation, etc. 3. Task force would need to be appointed soon, with application due in March/April 2000. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Previous informational packets from NCL b. Application materials from award -winning cities N:\ECONDEV\PRO]ECTS\PRIORITYWROJ-REQ.FRM\AU-AM02.DOC Form Date: March 19, 1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Rules of the City Council TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: XX REQUESTED BY: Patsy DuDupre Kendall CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton DATE OF REQUEST: May 18, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 18, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 0 List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) (W - 2. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. C. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\ccrules-OI.DOC Form Date: May 20, 1999 Page I of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Review Trash Pick -Up Contract TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: , Master Plan Component , Project Other: Franchise Agreement REQUESTED BY: Patsy Dupre CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB ,STAFF ,OTHER: _ STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton 481-5581 x 705 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-99 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 041 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. L7 C. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\trash-01.DOC Form Date:June 9, 2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Multi -family ZoningRequirements TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Debra Edmondson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy 481-5581 x743 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-1999 BY:GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 2. 3. (W List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. [7 M L;\COMDEV\WP-FQ,ES\PROJECrS\PRIORMVROJ-REQYRMWMF.ZoneAl.doc Form Date:June 9, 2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Manufactured Housing -- J TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY:, Debra Edmondson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy 481-5581 x743 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 2. 3 List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 2. a General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 0 C. L:\COMDEV\WP-FHM\PROJECTS\PRIORITYWROJ-REQ.FRM\Manu-housl.doc Form Datelune 9, 2000 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Grading (Earth Moving) Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Debra Edmondson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson 481-5581 x 726 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-1999 BY: GL_ Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. (W List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. l� C. L:\COMDEVIWP-FILES\PROJECt'S\PRIORTMPROJ-REQ.FRMTArt6A2.doc Foam Date:June 9, 2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Flood Plain Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision -X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Debra Edmonson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper 481-5581 x 779 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. LQ C. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECfS\PRIORITYIPROJ-REQ.FRM\FIIod-0l.doc Form Date:June 9, 2000 Page 1 of i PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM f W SHORT TITLE: Ord. 4834, Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing park dedication requirements. TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Park Board member Bill Kemp CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hultman, Director of Community Services DATE OF REQUEST: January 2000 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) Revise current park dedication requirements for residential and non-residential development to include addition of a park improvement fee, allow Park Board ability to designate land recommended to be dedicated, and reduce credits for private park facilities. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) tw l . City Attorney research regarding establishment of park improvement fees. 2. Parks Recreation and Open Space Master Plan currently being reviewed for revision b P P Y g Y consultant and staff Once Master Plan approved, revisions may result in broad ordinance changes to incorporate Master Plan recommendations. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 13 Form Date:May 29, 1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Ord. 774, Amending Trail System Master Plan to require all trails to be 8 feet in width. TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Park Board member Bill Kemp CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Human, Director of Community Services DATE OF REQUEST: February 2000 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Revise Trail System Master Plan to require all designated trails be eight feet (8'). Currently, only trail on North White Chapel is designated at 8', all other trails are designated to be six feet (6') in width. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Existing right of way and Master Thoroughfare Plan requirements accommodate current designated widths. May be potential concern in some areas. 2. Citizen involvement in initial Trail System Master Plan development did not favor wider trails. 3. General Comments: Trail System Master Plan currently being studied for revision. Process will include comprehensive review of Plan and numerous public meetings for input. This potential revision can be considered within the process of the Master Plan revision. Expected review by City Council in late 2000. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 13 C. L:\COMDEVIWP-FILES\PROIECTS\PRIORn-"ROI-REQ.FRMWBLANKS.doe Form Date:May 29, 1998 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Alternative Entry Design Standards for residential Developments Abutting Arterial Roads TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Commissioner Ken Horne CC , P&Z X , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy/Art Wright/ Chris Carpenter DATE OF REQUEST: 4/25/000 DATE RECEIVED: 4/25/00 BY: KPG, AW, CLC Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Too many walled communities, especially along arterial roadways in the Low Density Residential areas of Town 2. Find alternative ways to design entrances to residential developments which abut arterial roadways. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) Combination of berming, treed and landscaped medians, circulation drive in front of residential lots in lieu of fences and walls 2. Prevent "tunnel' effect along major corridors 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Look at lots abutting South Ridge Lakes Parkway Q L:\COMDEV\WP-FUES\PROJECTS\PRIORrrY\PROI-REQ.FRMWBLANK5.doc Form Date:May 29, 1998 Page 1 of I PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE:. Roads TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New . Minor Revision______, Major Revision Type: Ordinance . Master Plan Component . Project Other: REQUESTED BY: _ CC . P&Z , ZBA , PB . STAFF . OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: - DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 0 C. i `cotiroev�wr-�onm�rROJ-aBQ �x cs.aa Form Date:May 29.1998 Page 1 of 1 Ic AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/9/00 1:42 PM Council Meeting -June 20, 2000 1Council Meeting - July 18, 2000 Reports/Forum: Reports/Forum: Consent: Consent: ' Minutes of June 6 Res. #00-63, Amending the Personnel Policies to include the Family 1. Minutes bW Medical Leave policy - LS 2. Amending the Personnel Policy Manual to inc Worker's Comp Wage - 3. Approval of prof sery agr wBelcheff & Assoc for the engineering and LS design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and N. 3. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a prof servs agr w/JD Wilson and Assoc Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition - SP for development of a strategic plan - SKY 4. Approval of prof sery agr w/Cheatham & Assoc, for engr/design of sewer 4. Authorize IA w/CISD for natatorium - KH improv to serve Randol Mill Est., Hunter Ridge, & Timberline/Woodsey - SP 5. Res. 00-51 Changing terms for Teen Court Advisory Board - MB 6. V reading Ord. 784 Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund - SL 7. 1" reading Ord. 785 Establishing an Increase in Warrant Fee from $25.00 to $50.00 - SL 8. V reading Ord. 783Amending Article Il of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ord. Relating to the Municipal Court of Record - SL 9. Res. 00-64, Condemnation for a utility easement to construct an 18" sanitary sewer line (Haltom property) - SP. 10. Auth Mayor to execute Takeover Agr for sanitary sewer improv in Jellico Est w/Amwest Surety Inc. So. - CT 11. Developers Agreement Southlake Crossing Ph II, Hobby Lobby - CT 21 Reading / Pub Hearing & Related Items: 1. ZA 99-078, ZSP, Carroll High School 2. Ord. #_, establishing the speed limit in the Cambridge Place Addition at 25 mph - CT 3. Ord. 782, buy-back option - LS 4. ZA00-045, SP, Costco 5. ZA 00-063, SUP Tom Thumb 6. ZA 00-026, SP, CISD #5 7. ZA 00-027, PP, CISD #5 Pending P&Z Action 1° Reading & Related Items: 1. ZA 00-047, RZ, SP, L-3, B-1 Corner Addn 2. ZA 00-048 RZ, SP, L-2R, B-1, Corner Addn 3. ZA 00-049, PR, L- 2R&3, B-1, Corner Addn 4. ZA 00-055, PR, Lonesome Dove Church 5. ZA 00-064, RZ, SP, Bicentennial Park 6. **ZA 99-112, PP Easter Plaza 7. ** ZA 00-016, Z, for property So. of Walgreens "C-2" to "0-1" **Pending P&Z Action Reading / Pub Hearing & Related Items: 1. ** ZA 00-016, Z, for property So. of Walgreens "C-2" to "O-1" 2. **ZA 00-047, RZ, SP, L-3, B-1 Corner Addn 3. **ZA 00-048 RZ, SP, L-2R, B-1, Corner Addn 4. **ZA 00-064, RZ, SP, Bicentennial Park 5. **ZA W-060, SP, portion of L-4, B-1 Sabre Group **Pending P&Z Action 1° Reading & Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139, RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 2. **ZA 00-037, RZ, Tracts 4Gi & 4H, Johnson Rd 3. **ZA 00-038, PS, L-9&10, Johnson Road **Pending P&Z Action Resolutions: Resolutions: 1. Separate resolutions for appointments to all Boards and Commissions - SLG 2. Appointment of Mayor Pro Tern and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem - SLG 3. Res. No. _, adopting amendments to the Tax Abatement Agreement with Sabre - GL Consider: Consider: 1. Commercial developers agr for CISD No. 6 Addition - CT 1. Renewal of contract with Tennis Center Manager 2. CO#1 to contract w/Mid-State Utilities for the constr of an 18" sanitary 1 2. Bob Jones Park conceptual plan - KH sewer 3. CO #3 to the contract w/Jackson Constr, In.c for the sanitary sewer & paving improv for Love Henry Ct - SP 4. Award of bid for lighting at Bicentennial Park, Fields 4, 5, 10 - KH 0,rscuss: Executive Session: Discuss: 1. Ord. #778, Noise Ordinance - MJ/ Ord. No. 480-KK Noise Regs - KPG (PZ tabled to June 8, CC disc item when?) Executive Session: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/9/00 1:42 PM City Council Meeting — August 1, 2000 City Council Meeting — August 15, 2000 Forma: Fortran: wnsent: Consent: . Minutes 2. 2nd Reading / Pub Hearing & Related Items: 2nd Reading / Pub Hearing & Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139, RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 1. Ord. #778, Noise Ordinance - MJ/Ord. No. 480-KK Noise Regs - KPG 6. **ZA 00-037, RZ, Tracts 4G1 & 4H, Johnson Road 2. **ZA 00-024, RZ, 2929 N. White Ch., SF-lA, 24.414 ac (P&Z tabled to July 20) **Pending P&Z action -t Reading & Related Items: 1st Reading & Related Items: Ord. #778, Noise Ordinance - MJ/Ord. No. 480-KK Noise Regs - KPG 1. 2. **ZA 00-024, RZ, 2929 N. White Ch., SF-lA, 24.414 ac (P&Z tabled to July 20) 1. **ZA 00-036, PP Simmons Addn ** Pending P&Z action Resolutions: Resolutions: 1. Consider: Consider: Discuss: Discussion: Executive Session 2 AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/9/00 1:42 PM Future City Council Meeting Forum: meant: Fort Worth Water Contract - RH [4. Award bid on handrails Town Hall - RH Auth Mayor to execute letter authorizing TxDOT to change speed limits in construction zone on SH 114 - SP Award of Bid to for the purchase of furniture for Town Hall" to the AMS under consider items for September 5, 2000? 5. Abndmnt of 15' utility easement on property owned by Fina (S-7) - SP 6. Abndmnt of 15' utility easement on property owned by Explorer (S-7) - SP 7. Permission to advertise for bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Davis Blvd. and Continental - SP 2nd Reading / Pub Hearing & Related Items: 1st Reading & Related Items: 1. Ord. #760, ROW Use Management Ordinance - RH/SKY 2. Ord. 483-I, Amendments to Sub Ord No. 483, - Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements-CC/KH 3. Ord. No. 774, Amendment to Trail System Master Plan - CC/KH Resolutions: 1. Res. 99-16, relating to limiting # of zoning applications - from 3/23 CC mtg Consider: 1. Sidewalk / Trail Implementation Plan 2. Prof Services Agreement - Michael Drive (PW - 5/4/99) 3. Interlocal Agreement with Grapevine re: North Kimball - RH 4. Variance request - lighting at Bicentennial fields 4, 5, 10 5. Auth Mayor to enter into an IA w/NE Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS) - RH Discuss: 1. Land Conservatory District 2. Utility Policies & Standards Ordinance 3. Street Standard Ordinance 4. 5/16/2000 - Ord. 759, False alarm Ordinance - GW/Dupre 5. Ord. // , Sign Ordinance - MJ 6. Ord. 762, Adoption of Uniform Fire Code - RB 7. Ord. 770, High Grass/Weeds - MJ 8. Ord. 771, Nuisance Ordinance - MJ 9. Ord. _, Abatement of Hazardous Buildings - MJ 10. "Amendment to Master Thoroughfare Plan - CC 11. 'xecutive Session: May 23, 2000 Mr. Robert Finn City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Robert, I was not sure who to address this note to, but I had hopes that you would pass it on to the right person/department. As the daughter of senior citizens, having to call 911 for one of your parents is pretty scary. Last Tuesday night was one of those times. My Dad was having severe chest pains and he called the 911 dispatch and within minutes he was taken to the hospital. He spent the night at Baylor/ Grapevine but released Wednesday with a couple of prescriptions. On Friday morning, he had to call 911 once again, and the same EMS team came to his rescue. This time, just a couple of hours after he arrived at Harris Methodist/HEB, it was discovered that he had 100% blockage in one of the arteries going into his heart. That same afternoon he had surgery to open up the artery. He was home Monday morning and feeling great ! ! The real purpose of this note thank the city for having such caring employees that made my parents feel at ease and were treated as if they were the parents of the paramedics. Hopefully, we will not have to call 911 for a very long time. However, it is a comfort to know we will be dealing with professional and caring people. We are very grateful. Sincerely, 9 �Jwjr-' U.S. Customs Service 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20229 May 31, 2000 Ben A. Brown Police Sergeant Department of Public Safety 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Sergeant Brown: We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your help in rescuing three stranded females at 2:00 a.m. on Friday, May 19, 2000, outside the Wal-Mart in Southlake. We were from out-of-town and our flight had been cancelled after checking in at the airport. Our luggage had not been returned so we went to the Wal-Mart to buy a few things. After shopping we called for a cab. Unfortunately, all the cabs were tied up at the airport due to cancelled flights and after 3 hours we were still waiting. Your kindness in taking us to our hotel in Irving was greatly appreciated. As an expression of our gratitude please find enclosed some patches from the U.S. Customs Service, Air and Marine Interdiction Division. Karen Boyle Enclosure T RADITION SERVICE Sincerely, Phyl' is Beers athi rake HONOR V ` ' ( U 1� City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 7, 2000 To: Barry Hinkle, Lieutenant, Police Services From: Allen Wood, Corporal, Police Services Subject: Officer Compliment On this date, Regina Fiske of 916 Brazos, Southlake, contacted me. Mrs. Fiske wished to commend Officer C. Tripp #192 on her professionalism and diligence in discovering an open garage door at her residence this date at approximately 0445 hours. Mrs. Fiske said Tripp's actions may have prevented a burglary or other crime from occurring at her residence, and wished to thank Officer Tripp and inform the administration of the Southlake Dept. of Public Safety of her actions. I am available for any questions you may have. cc: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety Robert McAmis, Sergeant, Police Services David Law, Sergeant, Police Services Cindi Tripp, Officer, Police Services 3 o0 F� �G �CruLNG� (Z..,4a"V&t, C f ol�il�YlQ2a%e � r i UPC LL -ti Lj" T L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Do you have an idea, a comment, or a suggestion? Let us know how we are doing. Date of your visit: Department Visited: Building Services (Plans / Permits) [ ) Municipal Court [ ) Water / Sanitation / Recycle Rate each on scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) Was staff friendly? [1] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [4) Was staff knowledgeable? 11 [1] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [4] X� Was service prompt? [1] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [4)] Did you receive the informat' n / service needed? [1] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] —9xx Suggestions / Comments: M14 .Z UU , Do you wish to be contacted? [ ]Yes No Optional: / 1-10P Name: ODcyA(2,D 2cr� Address: Phone: Z`a S L- S ct p Email: Cr N A�j v Fes, o KC_ •�1� � a �-� �a�a G Y 2' %W May 5, 2000 Mr. Paul Ward City of Southlake Inspection Departm Sincere Senior Vice President Southern Home Realty, Inc. Corporate Office: 620 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 (817)329-3500 Fax: (817) 488-3371 RFJMK LONE STAR / D" SPONSORED �/v!{BYFROST BANK SOUTHLAKE I Tuesday, June 27, 2000 7:30 AM r { Marriott Solanna Hotel Speaker, Howard Giiberg will Provide a Clean Air Act Update Cost is $15 p/person at the door. $17 P/Person if Invoiced Please make your reservations before Thursday, June 22. e Phone (817) 481-8200 or fax (817) 329-7497. Unused reservations will be billed. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Lauren Safranek, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-63, Amending the personnel policies handbook to include the Family Medical Leave Policy. Action Requested: Consideration of Resolution No. 00-63, approving the amended personnel policies handbook to include a family medical leave policy. Background Information: This policy establishes the procedures the City has operated under to comply with the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993. This policy shall provide authorized leave for family and medical reasons to eligible employees in accordance with the provision of the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993. The purpose of this policy is to enable each eligible employee to take absences from work for up to 12 weeks during a 12- month period for new child leave and or medically -related reasons due to a serious health condition regarding the employee, spouse, child or parent. This policy does not provide additional leave for employees, but designates leave that is taken as family medical leave (FMLA leave) if it meets the requirements for FMLA leave. An employee would use accrued leave (sick, vacation and compensatory leave) for this purpose. Financial Considerations: Adopting a family medical leave act does not have financial implications since leave is already a benefit provided to the city's employees and this does not provide for the accrual of additional leave. Citizen Inputh Not Applicable Board Review: Not Applicable. Legal Review: The attorneys have reviewed the policy and addressed any legal issues pertaining to the family medical leave policy. Alternatives: The alternatives are to not adopt a policy, however, this policy is required by Federal law. 5B-1 Billy Campbell June 9, 2000 Page Two Supporting Documents: A copy of the Family Medical Leave policy. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends placing this item on the June 20th, City Council meeting agenda. SB-2 City of Southlake Section: Rules and Regulations Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Approved By: 1.0 Purpose Personnel Policies Topic: Family Medical Leave Policy Revision Date: The City of Southlake shall provide authorized leave for family and medical reasons to eligible employees in accordance with the provision of the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (the Act). The purpose of this policy is to enable each eligible employee to take absences from work for up to 12 weeks during a 12-month period for new child leave and or medically -related reasons due to a serious health condition regarding the employee, spouse, child or parent. 2.0 Definitions Definitions, unless amended by federal law, are as follows: 2.1 Child - means a biological, adopted, or foster child, a stepchild, a legal ward, or a child of a person standing in loco parentis, who is under 18 years of age; or 18 years of age or older and (W incapable of self -care because of a mental or physical disability. 2.2 Health Care Provider - any health care provider from whom the city or city's group health plan's benefits manager will accept certification of the existence of a serious health condition to substantiate a claim for benefits, or any health provider defined in the Act. 2.3 Intermittent Leave - FM .A leave taken in separate blocks of time due to a single qualifying reason. 2.4 Parent- means the biological parent of an employee or an individual who stood in loco parentis to an employee when the employee was a child. 2.5 Reduced Leave Schedule - a leave schedule that reduces the normally scheduled number of hours per week, or hours per workday, of an employee. 2.6 Serious health condition means an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves: a. inpatient care in a hospital, hospice, or residential medical care facility; or b. continuing treatment by a health care provider, including one or more of the following: 5 B -3 Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 2 1. A period of incapacity of more than three consecutive calendar days that requires: A. treatment two or more times by a health care provider or by a provider of health care services under the orders of a health care provider; or B. treatment by a health care provider on at least one occasion which results in a regimen of continuing treatment under the supervision of the health care provider; 2. Any period of incapacity due to pregnancy or for prenatal care even if no treatment is received during the absence; 3. Any period of incapacity or treatment for an incapacity due to a chronic serious health condition even if no treatment is received during the absence; 4. A period of incapacity which is permanent or long-term due to a condition for which treatment may not be effective; or 5. Any period of absence to receive multiple treatments by a health care provider or by a provider of health care services under orders of, or on referral by, a health care provider. Ordinarily, unless complications arise, the common cold, the flu, ear aches, upset stomach, minor ulcers, headaches other than migraine, routine dental or orthodontia problems, and periodontal disease are examples of conditions that do not meet the definition of a serious health condition and do not qualify for FMLA leave. 2.7 Spouse means a husband or wife as defined or recognized under state law for purposes of marriage, including common law marriage. 2.8 Work Week- A full time employee who works five days a week is entitled to 60 days of FMLA leave in a 12 month period. An employee who works four days a week is entitled to 48 days of leave. 3.0 Eligibility Requirements 3.1 Hours Worked -An employee is eligible for FMLA leave after 1,250 hours of work for the City during the previous 12-month period of time. A supervisor may grant FMLA leave to a regular, full-time employee that has been with the City for less than 12 months. 56-y Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 3 3.2 Qualifying Events - An employee who is eligible for FMLA leave is entitled to take a total of 12 work weeks of leave during a 12-month period for one or more of the following reason, unless amended by federal law: (a) Because of the birth of a child of the employee and in order to care for the child; (b) Because of the placement of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care; (c) In order to care for the spouse, child, or parent of the employee, if the spouse, child, or parent has a serious health condition; or (d) Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the employee's position. 3.3 Use of Available Leave - An employee who takes FMLA leave must substitute and exhaust accrued vacation leave, sick leave, and compensatory leave with pay, before beginning leave without pay status. 3.4 Worker's Compensation Leave - FMLA leave shall run at the same time as leave taken by an employee as worker's compensation leave if the injury meets the criteria for a serious health condition. 3.5 Request for Leave Form - If an employee is eligible for FMLA leave for any of the reasons as (W stated above, the employee should submit an FMLA Request for Leave Form, which can be obtained from the Human Resources Department, or notify the employee's supervisor or Human Resources office as soon as it is known that leave is needed. 4.0 Leave Calculations 4.1 Measurement - The 12-month period during which an employee is eligible for 12 work weeks of leave will be measured backward from the date the employee uses any FMLA leave. 4.2 Leave for Child - Entitlement to FMLA leave under the condition of the birth of a child or the adoption of a child, expires at the end of the 12 month period beginning on the date of the birth or placement of the child. 4.3 Spouses Working for the City - If a husband and wife are both employed by the City, the combined total leave is limited to 12 work -weeks during any 12-month period, if the leave is taken: (a) for the birth or adoption of a child; or (b) to care for a sick parent of the employee with a serious health condition. 5g-� Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 4 .0 Intermittent Leave 5.1 Conditions Eligible for Intermittent Leave - Subject to Section 5.2, an employee may take on a reduced work schedule under FMLA for conditions relating to a serious health condition for the following reasons: (a) the serious health condition of employee; (b) to care for a spouse, child or parent of the employee which has a serious health condition; (c) for the birth or placement for adoption or foster care placement, of a child, only if the Employee and the City agree to such an arrangment. Taking leave intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule shall not result in a reduction of leave for which the employee is entitled. 5.2 Transfer to Accommodate Intermittent Leave - If an employee requests intermittent leave or leave on a reduced work schedule that is foreseeable based on planned medical treatment, the City may require the employee transfer temporarily to an available alternative position for which the employee is qualified and that: (a) has equivalent pay and benefits; and (b) better accommodates recurring periods of leave than the regular employment position of the employee. 6.0 Responsibilities of Employee/Employer for FMLA leave 6.1 Notification for Birth or Adoption - When the necessity for FMLA leave under Section 3.2 (1) or 3.2 (2) is foreseeable because of an expected birth or placement, the employee shall provide notice to his or her supervisor and the Human Resources Department notice of the employee's intention to take FMLA leave not less than 30 days before the date the leave is to begin. If the date of the birth or placement requires leave to begin in less than 30 days, the employee shall provide notice as soon as practicable. 6.2 Notification of Reason for Leave - When an employee takes paid or unpaid leave for a reason that qualifies for FMLA leave, the employee shall include in the notice or request a description of the reason for the leave. 6.3 Notification for Medical Treatment - When FMLA leave shall occur under Section 3.2 (3) or 3.2 (4), the employee shall make reasonable effort to schedule treatment so as not to disrupt 513 ^(n Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 5 unduly the operations of the City, subject to approval of the health care provider; and shall provide his or her supervisor and the Human Resources Department with not less than 30 days' notice, before the date the leave is to begin; except, that if the date of the treatment requires leave to begin in less than 30 days, the employee shall provide notice as soon as possible. 6.4 Notification to Employee - Within two business days of receipt by Human Resources of notice from an employee requesting paid or unpaid leave, the Human Resources Department shall: (a) determine whether the reason for the leave qualifies for FMLA leave; and (b) determine whether the employee is eligible for FMLA leave; and (c) notify the employee in writing of the determination, designating the leave as FMLA leave, if it qualifies. 6.5 Additional information - If at the time of a request for any paid or unpaid leave, the Human Resources Department is not given enough information to determine that the leave qualifies as FMLA leave, then within two business days of receiving adequate information, the Human Resources Department shall notify the employee that the leave has been designated as FMLA leave. In this case leave taken before the date of the Human Resources Director's notice may be counted against an employee's 12-week FMLA entitlement. 6.6 Employee obligations - If leave qualifies as FMLA leave, the Human Resources Department shall, at the time of giving notice to the employee, provide the employee with an FMLA Information Form detailing the specific expectations and obligations of the employee and explaining any consequences of a failure to meet these obligations. 7.0 Medical Certification and Documentation 7.1 Documentation for Leave Due to Medical Condition - The Human Resources Department may require, by giving a written request to an employee, that FMLA leave under Section 3.2 (3) or (4) of these procedures be supported by a certification issued by the health care provider of the employee or the child, spouse, or parent of the employee. A certification must be furnished within 15 days of receipt of this request. A certification must state: (a) the date on which the serious health condition commenced; (b) the probable duration of the condition; (c) the appropriate medical facts within the knowledge of the health care provider regarding the condition; 513--1 Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 6 (d) for purposes of leave under Section 3.2 (3), a statement that the employee is needed to care for the child, spouse, or parent and an estimate of the amount of time that the employee is needed to care for the child, spouse, or parent; (e) for the purpose of leave under Section 3.2 (4), a statement that the employee is unable to perform the functions of the position of the employee; (f) in the case of certification for intermittent leave or leave on a reduced work schedule for planned medical treatment, the dates on which the treatment is expected to be given and the duration of the treatment; (g) in the case of certification for intermittent leave, or leave on a reduced work schedule under Section 3.2 (4), a statement of the medical necessity for the intermittent leave, or leave on a reduced work schedule and the expected duration of the intermittent leave; and (h) in the case of certification for intermittent leave under Section 3.2 (3), a statement that the employee's intermittent leave is necessary for the care of the child, spouse, or parent who has a serious health condition, or will assist in their recovery, and the expected duration and schedule of the intermittent leave. 7.2 Second Opinion - If the City has reason to doubt the validity of the certification provided under Section 6.0, for leave under Section 3.2 (3) or (4), the City may require, at the City's expense, that the employee obtain the opinion of a second health care provider designated or approved by the City concerning any information certified under Section 6.0. A health care provider designated or approved under this section may not be employed on a regular basis by the City. 7.3 Third Opinion - If the second opinion described differs from the opinion in the original certification, the City may require, at the City's expense, that the employee obtain the opinion of a third health care provider designated or approved jointly by the City and the employee concerning the information certified under Section 6. The opinion of the third health care provider concerning this information is final and binding on the City and the employee. 8.0 Health Benefits 8.1 Continuation of Benefits - The City will provide health benefits to an employee while on FMLA leave at the level and under the conditions benefits would have been provided if the employee had continued in employment for the duration of the leave. If the employee is considered at the status of leave without pay, the employee will be responsible for paying insurance premiums for the employee's dependants. 5a-0 Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page 7 8.2 Recovering Costs of Benefits - The City may recover the cost that the City paid for the employee's health benefits during the period of unpaid leave if: (a) the employee fails to return to work after the period of leave to which the employee is entitled has expired; and (b) the employee fails to return to work for a reason other than: 1. the continuation, recurrence, or onset of a serious health condition that entitles the employee to leave under Section 3.2 (3) or (4); or , 2. other circumstances beyond the control of the employee. 9.0 Delay or Denial of FMLA Benefits 9.1 Delay - The City may delay the taking of FMLA leave under the following circumstances: (a) if an employee fails to give timely advance notice when the need for (br FMLA leave is foreseeable, FMLA leave may be delayed until 30 days after the date the employee provides notice to the City of the need for FMLA leave; or (b) if an employee fails to provide in a timely manner a requested medical certification to substantiate the need for FMLA leave, the continuation of FMLA leave may be delayed until the employee submits the certificate. if an employee fails to provide a requested fitness -for -duty certification to return to work, the city may delay restoration until the employee submits the certificate; 9.2 Termination of employment - If an employment relationship terminates, an employee's right to continued maintenance of health benefits and restoration to the employee's position ceases under FMLA. 9.3 Fraud - If an employee fraudulently obtains FMLA leave, the City may deny job restoration or maintenance of health benefits, and the employee is subject to disciplinary action, including termination. Family Medical Leave Policy Effective Date: June 20, 2000 Page s 10.0 Return To Work 10.1 Restoration to Employment - An employee eligible for family and medical leave will be restored to his or her old position or to a position with equivalent pay, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment. The City of Southlake cannot guarantee that an employee will be returned to his or her original job. A determination as to whether a position is an "equivalent position" will be made by The City of Southlake. 10.2 Release from Physician - Before reporting back to work from FMLA leave taken because of a serious health condition an employee must provide a written release to his supervisor from the attending physician that the employee is able to perform the functions of the job. The supervisor shall immediately forward this release to the Human Resources Department. 10.3 Release for Unrestricted Work - If the release form contains any restrictions, before an employee can return back to work unrestricted and resume the employee's job duties as set forth in the employee's job description, the health care provider must complete and sign a release indicating full release. The employee shall submit the form to the Human Resources Department or the employee's supervisor, who shall submit the form to the Human Resources Department. 5-1b RESOLUTION NO. 00-63 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS, AMENDING THE PERSONNEL POLICIES TO INCLUDE THE FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE POLICY. WHEREAS, City of Southlake (the "City") recognizes that employees frequently have to manage the demands of the workplace with the needs of families; and WHEREAS, The ability for employees to take time from. work for family medical needs without the risk of loosing their job or benefits promotes the stability and economic security of families; and WHEREAS, The Federal Government has enacted the Family Medical Leave Act to entitle employees to take reasonable leave for medical reasons, for the birth or adoption of a child, and for the care of a child, spouse or parent who has a serious health condition; and WHEREAS, The Family Medical Leave Act accomplishes the purposes described above in a manner that accommodates the legitimate interests of employers, now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, THAT: Section 1: The City of Southlake hereby amends the Personnel Policies to include the Family Medical Leave policy. Section 2: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF 92000. ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary Rick Stacy, Mayor 5B-1 I R City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Approval of a professional services agreement with Belcheff & Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the North Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Addition Action Requested: Approve a professional services agreement with Belcheff & Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the N. Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Addition as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. Background Information: Each year as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, the City Council appropriates funds in the CIP budget to engineer and construct sanitary sewer improvements to serve neighborhoods currently on septic systems. The City Council approved in the CIP budget to engineer and design the sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. A project map is attached for each neighborhood. The engineering and design is anticipated to take 110 days to complete. The CIP budget has available funds to construct the sanitary sewer to serve Hillside Estates following the design. Construction of the sanitary sewer improvements to serve the N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition is scheduled for the FY00-01. Financial Considerations: The professional services agreement for the engineering and surveying for the sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition totals $48,573. The estimated engineering and design cost for the project included in the CIP budget was $62,820. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Once the project has been preliminarily designed, a SPIN meeting for each neighborhood will be held to discuss the project with the residents. The City surveyed the residents of Hillside Estates to determine if a consensus existed in the subdivision to support the construction of the sanitary sewer. Of the 16 notices mailed, all were completed and returned. 13 residents supported the installation of sanitary sewer while 3 opposed the installation of sanitary sewer. The residents of the Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Addition have not yet been polled since construction is scheduled 5C-1 t 0 41 Im City of Southiake, Texas for next fiscal year, however staff recommends proceeding with the design of the sewer. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: Not applicable. Supporting Documents: Hillside Estates Project Map N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition Project Map Proposal from Belcheff & Associates, Inc. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve the professional services agreement with Belcheff & Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the N. Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. Please place this item on the June 20, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for approval. SEP/sep 5C-2 0 I HILLSIDE ESTATES SANITARY SEWER PROJECT MAP i 5C-3 t Existing Sanitary Sewer N. Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Sanitary Sewer Project Map THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT Hillside Estates & Pearson Ln.-Pecan Acres Sanitary Sewer Project Name City of Southlake Project No. 100501.01 & 100501.02 BAI Project No. THIS CONTRACT, by and between the CITY OF SOUTHLAKF., a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", and BELCHEFF & ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Texas, hereinafter called "Engineer", evidences the following: WHEREAS, City desires the professional engineering services of Engineer for design of Hillside Estates & Pearson Lane -Pecan Acres Sanitary Sewer (see attached Figures `'..� 1 & 2.) in the City of Southlake and County of Tarrant, Texas hereinafter called "Project"; and WHEREAS, Engineer represents that it is qualified and capable of performing the professional engineering services proposed herein for this Project and is willing to enter into this Contract with City to perform said services; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein agreed as follows: 1. EMPLOYMENT OF THE ENGINEER Engineer agrees to perform professional services in connection with the Project as set forth in the following sections of this Contract, and City agrees to pay, and Engineer agrees to accept fees as set forth in the following sections as full and final compensation for all services provided under this Contract. 2. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION This Contract shall be administered on behalf of the City by the Director of Public Works or his designated representatives (hereinafter called "Director"), and on behalf of the Engineer by its duly authorized officials. P&4.doc Rev. 07/29/96 5C-5 Page 1 of 8 3. ENGINEER'S SERVICES The Engineer agrees to render services necessary for the development of the Project as outlined in attached Part A, Exhibit "A" & Part B, Exhibit "A" -- "Scope of Work." 4. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES A. Payment for Basic Services under Article 3 will be considered Fixed Fee. Payment for Additional Services provided by the Engineer will be computed at Engineer's current hourly rates to determine the payment due for such services. Current hourly rates are as shown in Attachment `B". B. Payments shall also include Direct Non -Labor Expenses which, in general, include expenses for supplies, transportation, equipment, travel, communication, subsistence and lodging away from home, and similar incidentals. The Direct Non -Labor expenses shall be reimbursable at actual invoice cost plus 10%, except for living and travel expenses when away from the home office on business connected with the Project. All travel outside of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area to be made, which are reimbursable at actual invoice cost, by the Engineer in connection with the Project must first be approved in writing by 11 the City's Engineer. . A C. Subcontractor cost shall be reimbursed at the actual invoice cost plus 10%. D. Engineer shall submit itemized monthly statements for Services, Direct Non -Labor Expenses, and for Subcontractors Costs incurred. City shall make payments in the amount shown by the Engineer's monthly statements and other documentation submitted, and no interest shall ever be due on late payments. E. Payments for expenses, costs, and services for Basic Services, described in Article 3, shall be $18,525 for Part A and $28,898 for Part B. F. Payments for expenses, costs, and services for Direct Non -Labor Expenses, described in Article 3, shall not exceed $400 for Part A nor $750 for Part B. G. Payments for expenses, costs, and services, for Subcontractor cost, described in Article 3, shall not exceed N/A. H. Total payments for expenses, costs, and services, described in Article 3, shall not exceed $18,925 for Part A or $29,648 for Part B. •I. Nothing contained in this article shall require City to pay for any work which is unsatisfactory as reasonably determined by the Director or which is not submitted P&Cdoe Rev. 07129196 �. Page 2 of 8 in compliance with the terms of this Contract. City shall not be required to make any payments to the Engineer when the Engineer is in default under this Contract; nor shall this paragraph constitute a waiver of any right, at law or in equity, which Citv_ may have if the Engineer is in default, including the right to bring legal action for damages or for specific performance of this Contract. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All information and other data given to, prepared, or assembled by Engineer under this Contract, and other related items shall become the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City, without restriction on future use. Engineer may make copies of any and all documents and items for its files. A set of final blueline plans shall be filed with the City prior to final payment. Engineer shall have no liability for changes made to or use of the drawings, specifications, and other documents by anyone subsequent to the completion of the Project. City shall require that any such change or other use shall be sealed by the Engineer making that change or use and shall be approximately marked to reflect what was changed or modified. 6. SERVICES BY CITY City shall provide the following services under this Contract: A. Provide available criteria and information to the Engineer as City's requirements for the Project. B. Provide sample drawings, standard details and forms to use as guidelines. C. Provide all available City of Southlake drawings, maps, and notes relating to existing public facilities within the limits of the Project. 7. COMPLETION SCHEDULE The services furnished by the Engineer under this Contract will be completed in accordance with the following: Preliminary Plans submittal 60 calendar days Final Plans submittal 30 calendar days Bid Document submittal 15 calendar days Construction TBD For the purposes of this Contract, a month is defined as thirty (30) calendar days and a week as seven (7) calendar days. If any of the following submissions fall on a City non- working day, then the submission shall be due the following City working day. PSA.doc Rev. 07129196 5C-7 Page 3 of 8 8. NOTICE TO PROCEED City shall have complete control of the services to be rendered and no work shall be done under this Contract until the Engineer is instructed in writing to proceed. 9. TERTY NATION OF CONTRACT City may indefinitely suspend further work hereunder or terminate this Contract or any phase of this Contract upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Engineer with the understanding that immediately upon the receipt of such notice all work and labor being performed under this Contract shall cease immediately. Before the end of the thirty (30) day period, Engineer shall invoice the City for all work accomplished by him prior to the receipt of such notice. No amount shall be due for lost or anticipated profits. All plans, field surveys, and other data related to the Project shall become property of City upon termination of the Contract and shall be promptly delivered to City in a reasonably organized form without restriction on future use except as stated in Article 5. Should City subsequently contract with a new consultant for continuation of services on the Project, Engineer shall cooperate in providing information. 10. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES Approval by City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Engineer, its employees, associates, agents, and consultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other work; nor shall approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by City for any defect in the design or other work prepared by the Engineer, its employees, subcontractor, agents and consultants. 11. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY A. The Engineer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national origin, or place of birth. The Engineer shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, age, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national origin, or place of birth. B. If the Engineer fails to comply with the Federal Laws relating to Equal Employment Opportunity, it is agreed that the City at its option may do either or both of the following: ` 1) Cancel, terminate, or suspend the contract in whole or in part; 2) Declare the Engineer ineligible for further City Contracts until he is determined to be in compliance. PSA.doc Rev. 07129196 Page 4 of 8 5Q-8 12. AMENDMENTS This Contract may be amended or supplemented in any particular only by written instrument and only as approved by resolution of City Council or the City Manager, except for termination under Section 9, Termination of Contract, which may be accomplished by the Director of Public Works or his designated representative as identified in Section 9, Termination of Contract. 13. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS CHARTERS AND ORDINANCES ETC. The Engineer, his consultants, agents and employees, and subcontractors shall comply with all applicable Federal and State Laws, the Charter and Ordinances of the City of Southlake, and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by all local, state, and national boards, bureaus, and agencies existing and published before date of this agreement. 14. RIGHT OF REVIEW Engineer agrees that City may review any and all of the work performed by Engineer under this Contract. City if hereby granted the right to audit at City's election, all of the consultant's records and billings related to the performance of this contract. Engineer agrees to retain such records for a minimum of three (3) years following completion of this + contract. 15. CONFLICT OF INTEREST No officer or employee shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contract with the City or be financially interested, directly, in the sale to the City of any land, materials, supplies, or services, except on behalf of the City as an officer or employee. Any violation of this section shall constitute malfeasance in office and any officer or employee guilty thereof shall thereby forfeit his office or position with the City. Any violation of this section with knowledge, expressed or implied, of the person or corporation contracting with the City shall render the Contract involved voidable by the City Manager or the City Council. 16. CONTRACT PERSONAL This Contract is for personal and professional services; and the Engineer shall not assign this Contract, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City. 17. NOTICES All notices, communications, and reports required or permitted under this Contract shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing the same in the P&4.doc Rev. 07/29/96 5i"9 Page 5 of 8 United States Mail at the address shown below unless and until either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party at the following addresses. Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated after five days. If intended for Southlake, to: Ronald J. Harper, P.E. Contact Person Director of Public Works Title City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 (817-481-5581 18. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR If intended for Engineer, to: George Belcheff III, P.E. Contact Person Chief Engineer Title Belcheff & Associates, Inc. Firm Name 1200 S. White Chapel, Ste. A Address Southlake, Texas 76092 City, State, Zip Code (817)421-4891 Telephone No. In performing services under this Contract, Engineer is performing services of the type performed prior to this contract; and Engineer by the execution of this contract does not change the independent status of the Engineer. No term, or provision hereof, or act of Engineer in the performance of this Contract shall be construed as making Engineer the agent, servant, or employee of Southlake. 19. INDEMNITY Engineer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City_ whole and harmless against any and all claims for damages, costs, and expenses of persons or property that may arise out of, or be occasioned by, or from any negligent act, error or omission of Engineer, or any agent, servant, or employee of Engineer in the execution or performance of this Contract, without regard to whether such persons are under the direction of City agents or employees. . This provision shall not be deemed to apply to liability for damage that is caused by or results from the negligence of the City of Southlake or its employees or others agents. PSA.doc Rev. 07129196 Page 6 of 8 20. INSURANCE Engineer agrees to maintain workmen's compensation insurance to cover all of its own personnel engaged in performing services for client under this agreement. Engineer also agrees to maintain public liability insurance covering claims against Engineer for damages resulting from bodily injury, death or property damage from accidents arising in the course of services performed under this agreement.. 21. VTENUE The obligations of the parties to this Contract are performable in Tarrant County, Texas; and if legal action is necessary to enforce it, exclusive venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas. 22. APPLICABLE LAWS This Contract is made subject to the provisions of the Southlake Code, other City Ordinances, Standards, Southlake Specifications for materials and construction, as amended, and all State and Federal Laws. 23. GOVERNING LAWS This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws and decisions of the State of Texas. 24. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions thereof; and this Contract shall be considered as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this Contract. 25. PUBLISHED MATERIAL Engineer agrees that the City shall review and approve any written material about City projects and/or activities prior to being published by the Engineer. 26. CAPTIONS The captions to the various clauses of this Contract are for informational purposes only and shall not alter any substance of the terms and conditions of this Contract. M.docRev. 07/29/96 SC-11 Page 7 of 8 4 27. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Contract shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and, except as otherwise provided in this Contract, their assigns. 28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Contract (page 1 thru 8) embodies the complete agreement of the parties hereto, superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreements between the parties and relating to matters in this Contract, and except as otherwise provided herein, cannot be modified without written agreement of the parties to be attached to and made a part of this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this agreement in triplicate originals on this date, the day of , 2000. BELCHEFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Signature Sr. Engineer Title 1200.S. White Chapel Ste. A Address Sout_hlake, Texas 76092 City, State, Zip Code P&Cdoc Rev. 07/29/96 i2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Manager Director of Public Works Page 8 of 8 0 Part "A", Exhibit "A" -- Scope of Work Hillside Estates Sanitary Sewer Southlake Proj. No. BAI Proj. No. 100501.01 Belcheff and Associates, Inc. shall perform for you the following described Basic Services: 1. Preliminary Phase - a. observe site for design constraints and special conditions b. meet with City representative to clarify design requirements and standards and to collect existing utility and ROW information C. perform topographic design survey of proposed sewerline installation area d. prepare survey base drawing e. identify ROW/Easements from existing records f. prepare preliminary construction plans for - i. Installation of 8" sewerline extension as shown on attached "Figure 1" a) Evaluate bored areas versus open cut installation areas g. prepare outline of bid document h. submit and review preliminary design drawings with City 2. Final Design Phase - a. Receive, confirm and incorporate reasonable review comments from City into final plans b. prepare final construction plans for - i. Installation of 8" sewerline extension as shown on attached "Figure 1" C. prepare or utilize city standard construction details d. finalize bid document e. submit and review final design drawings with City 3. Bid Documents - a. receive, confirm and incorporate reasonable review comments from City into bid documents b. provide City with conformed blueline drawings and bid document for City's use 4. Construction Phase - a. Issue and track Bid Documents released to Bidders b. Provide Bid Tabulation with recommendation for award C. Complete contract documents for City processing d. Attend pre -construction meeting e. provide field clarifications as required f. provide as -built record blueline drawings from contractor mark-ups for city files •- g. provide electronic *.dxf files for city use HSScp1SSdoc 06108100 9:59AM 5C-13 1 of 1 Part "B", Exhibit "A" -- Scope of Work Pearson Ln.-Pecan Acres Sanitary Sewer Southlake Proj. No. BAI Proj. No. 100501.01 Belcheff and Associates, Inc. shall perform for you the following described Basic Services: 1. Preliminary Phase - a. observe site for design constraints and special conditions b. meet with City representative to clarify design requirements and standards and to collect existing utility and ROW information C. perform topographic design survey of proposed sewerline installation area d. prepare survey base drawing e. identify ROW/Easements from existing records f. prepare preliminary construction plans for - i. Installation of 8" sewerline extension as shown on attached "Figure 1" a) Evaluate bored areas versus open cut installation areas g. prepare outline of bid document h. submit and review preliminary design drawings with City 2. Final Design Phase - a. Receive, confirm and incorporate reasonable review comments from City into final plans t b. prepare final construction plans for - i. Installation of 8" sewerline extension as shown on attached "Figure 1" C. prepare or utilize city standard construction details d. finalize bid document e. submit and review final design drawings with City 3. Bid Documents - a. receive, confirm and incorporate reasonable review comments from City into bid documents b. provide City with conformed blueline drawings and bid document for City's use 4. Construction Phase - a. Issue and track Bid Documents released to Bidders b. Provide Bid Tabulation with recommendation for award C. Complete contract documents for City processing d. Attend pre -construction meeting e. provide field clarifications as required f. provide as -built record blue line drawings from contractor mark-ups for city files g. provide electronic *.dxf files for city use PAscopl SS.doc 0&08/0010:12 AM 5C-14 1 of I Attachment `B" BAI Rate Schedule as of March 1, 2000 Sr. Engineer Staff Engineer/Surveyor Design Technician CAD Technician Survey Crew (2 man) $125.00 per hour $85.00 per hour $65.00 per hour $50.00 per hour $120.00 per hour Clerical $35.00 per hour Reimbursable Expenses Cost + 15% Out-of-town travel, submittal or client use reproductions, long distance telephone and facsimile transmissions, couriers, and other direct costs Sub -Consultants Mileage (outside of city) Cost + 10% $0.35/mi. i Hillside Estates Sanitary Sewer Conceptual Cost Estimate ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIM. UNITS COST PER EXTENDED NO. QUANT. UNIT TOTAL 1 Mobilization 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000 S" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 0-6 VF 50 LF $36.00 $1,800 3 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 6-8 VF 590 LF $38.00 $22,420 4 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 8-10 VF 590 LF $42.00 $24,780 5 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 10-12 VF 590 LF $46.00 $27,140 6 4" PVC SS Service (Short) 3 Ea. $400.00 $1,200 7 4" PVC SS Service (Long) 3 Ea. $1,000.00 $3,000 8 4' Dia. Manhole (0-6' Depth) 6 Ea. $2,500.00 $15,000 9 Extra Depth of 4' Dia. Manhole 20 VF $112.00 $2,240 10 Connection to Existing Manhole 2 Ea. $500.00 $1,000 11 8" Bore 400 LF $110.00 $44,000 12 Watertight Manhole Insert 6 Ea. $60.00 $360 13 Concrete Encasement 400 LF $30.00 $12,000 14 Trench Safety System 1820 LF $3.50 $6,370 15 Stormwater Pollution Prevention 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000 16 Post Construction TV Inspection 1820 LF $2.50 $4,550 17 Vacuum Testing of Manholes 6 Ea. $100.00 $600 18 Misc. items 5.0% LS $8,623 $8,623 Subtotal $181,083 Constr. 10% Contingency $18,108 Total $199,191 Construction 6.5% Design Eng. $12,947 2.8% Design Surv. $5,577 Total $217,716 Project Cost Note: Estimated costs do not include easement acquisition 5C-16 Pearson Ln./Pecan Acres Sanitary Sewer Conceptual Cost Estimate ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIM. UNITS COST PER EXTENDED NO. QUANT. UNIT TOTAL 1 Mobilization 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 2 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 0-6 VF 108 LF $36.00 $3,888 3 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 6-8 VF 933 LF $38.00 $35,454 4 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 8-10 VF 933 LF $42.00 $39,186 5 8" SDR 35 PVC Sewer Main, 10-12 VF 933 LF $46.00 $42,918 6 4" PVC SS Service (Short) 16 Ea. $400.00 $6,400 7 4" PVC SS Service (Long) 1 Ea. $1,000.00 $1,000 8 4' Dia. Manhole (0-6' Depth) 7 Ea. $2,500.00 $17,500 9 Extra Depth of 4' Dia. Manhole 16 VF $112.00 $1,792 10 Connection to Existing Manhole 2 Ea. $500.00 $1,000 11 8" Bore 500 LF $110.00 $55,000 12 Watertight Manhole Insert 7 Ea. $60.00 $420 13 Concrete Encasement 500 LF $30.00 $15,000 14 Trench Safety System 2907 LF $3.50 $10,175 15 Stormwater Pollution Prevention 1.5 Ac. $5,000.00 $7,500 16 Post Construction TV Inspection 2907 LF $2.50 $7,268 17 Vacuum Testing of Manholes 7 Ea. $100.00 $700 18 Misc. items 5.0% LS $12,510 $12,510 Subtotal $262,710 Constr. 10% Contingency $26,271 Total $288,981 Construction 7.5% Design Eng. $21,674 2.5% Design Surv. $7,225 Total $317,879 Project Cost Note: Estimated costs do not include easement acquisition +0-17 5C-18 NTS tC I- t S 5C-19 City of Southlake, Texas TO FROM MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 Billy Campbell, City Manager Shawn Poe, Assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Approval of a professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition Action Requested: Approve a professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. Background Information: Each year as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, the City Council appropriates funds in the CIP budget to engineer and construct sanitary sewer improvements to serve neighborhoods currently on septic systems. The City Council approved in the CIP budget to engineer and design the sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. A project map is attached for each neighborhood. The engineering and design is anticipated to take 110 days to complete. The CIP budget has available funds to construct the sanitary sewer to serve Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates following the design. Construction of the sanitary sewer improvements to serve the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition is scheduled during the FY00-01. Financial Considerations: The professional services agreement for the engineering and surveying for is the sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition is for $47,950. The estimated engineering and design cost for the project included in the CIP budget was $100,410. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Once the project has been preliminarily designed, a SPIN meeting for each neighborhood will be held to discuss the project with the residents. The City surveyed the residents of Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition to determine if a consensus 5D-1 City of Southlake, Texas existed in the subdivisions to support the construction of the sanitary 1 sewer. The results are tabulated below: Legal Review: Alternatives: Supporting Documents: Staff Recommendation: SEP/sep a Z.. Subdivision Notices i Returned Support I Oppose % Mailed Notices Sewer Sewer Support Hunter's 19 14 13 1 93 Ridge Randol Mill 22 8 7 1 88 Estates Timberline/ 67 25 13 12 52 Woodse * Based on the number of notices received None. Not applicable. Hunter's Ridge Project Map Randol Mill Estates Project Map Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition Project Map Proposal from Cheatham & Associates Staff recommends City Council approve the professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. Please place this item on the June 20, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for approval. HUNTER'S RIDGE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT MAP HILLSIDE ESTATES SANITARY SEWER PROJECT MAP 51D-4 TIMBERLINE/WOODSEY COURTS ADDITION SANITARY SEWER PROJECT MAP CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES I lay 8, 2000 Mr. Ron Harper, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 1721 East Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection with the Design of Sewer System Improvements Consisting of a Sanitary Sewer System for Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates and Timberline/Woodsey Courts CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates Additions and Timberline Court and Woodsey Court are situated such that sanitary sewer service can be provided to the existing residents fairly easily. Existing sewer outfall lines are currently in place. This will allow the lines which are proposed to be connected to the existing system. Therefore, it is proposed that sanitary sewer lines be constructed within these additions and connected to the existing outfall lines. As a result, these additions will be available for sewer service. The project will include the surveying, design, bidding, and contract administration of the proposed construction. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Surveying 1.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 We will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation, if required, will also be furnished. (See Item 3.2) 2.0 Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the sewer line. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro0 Fax 817/265-8532 Mr. Ron Harper P.E. May 8, 2000 �,.. City of Southlake Page 2 2.2 Our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. 2.3 NVe will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. Our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice -to -proceed. 2.4 Periodic on -site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 3.0 Easements (if required) 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes & bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). 3.3 This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4 This proposal does not contemplate our firm providing assistance in acquiring property owner's signatures, nor participating in any condemnation proceedings without additional compensation. 4.0 Inspection 4.1 We will not furnish full-time on -site construction inspection, but will make periodic visits to the site, and will be available for plan interpretations. FEES We will provide all the services and products described in the scope of services including all services necessary for engineering surveying, engineering, preparation of construction plans and specifications, preparation of construction cost estimates, contract administration, construction staking and periodic visits during construction, and as -built plans for a flat fee of $35,650.00 for engineering, and $12,300.00 for surveying, including design surveys and construction staking. It is assumed that the sewer lines will be constructed within city street right-of-way, and no private easements will be required. If easements are necessary, they will be provided at an additional fee to be agreed to by the city. (See attachment "A" for cost breakdown.) TERMS '�... Invoicing will be based on percentage of completion. Billing will normally occur around the first of each month and payment expected within ten working days. 50-7 Mr. Ron Harper P.E. City of Southlake GUARANTEE May 8, 2000 Page 3 Cheatham & Associates guarantee to maintain the fees presented herein for 90 days from the date of this proposal unchanged. If the above meets with your approval, this proposal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or requested modifications of the proposal. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. F:\WORD\PROPOSAL\SOUTHLAK\Hunter Ridge.wpd AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Accepted this By: Title: day of , 2000 t ATTACHMENT "A" ENGINEERING.'SURVEYING FEE CALCULATION: PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE: Field Crew $ 75.00 x 84 firs ..... $ 6,300.00 Staff Engineer $ 75.00 x 40 firs.... $ 3,000.00 Cad Technician $ 55.00 x 120 firs.... $ 6,600.00 SUB -TOTAL ...... $ 15,900.00 FINAL DESIGN PHASE: Staff Engineer $ 75.00 x 124 firs ..... $ 9,300.00 Cad Technician $ 55.00 x 250 firs .... $ 13,750.00 SUB -TOTAL ...... $ 23,050.00 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: Field Crew $ 75.00 x 80 firs ..... $ 6,000.00 Staff Engineer $ 75.00 x 40 firs ..... $ 3,000.00 SUB -TOTAL ......... $ 9,000.00 TOTAL SURVEYING ........................................ $ 12,300.00 TOTAL ENGINEERING ...................................... $ 35,650.00 TOTAL FEE ........................................ $ 47,950.00 a k City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM TO: Billy Campbell FROM: Monica Broadhurst, Metroport Teen Court Coordinator SUBJECT: Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board, Resolution No. 00-51 Action Requested: Change Advisory Board Terms from one year appointments to two year appointments running from May to May. This item was discussed at the May 2, 2000 Council meeting. Background Information: The Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board is made up of two representatives from each of the participating entities. The role of the Advisory Board is to serve as a liaison between the Teen Court program and the entity they represent. They help the Teen Court Coordinator determine ways to best serve the entities. Council Member Patsy DuPre recommended the term of appointment be changed from a one-year appointment to a two-year appointment. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No Citizen Input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The City Council may approve the change or leave the appointment at a one- year term. Supporting Documents: None Staff Recommendation: Place change of Advisory Board terms on the consent agenda for the June 20, 2000 City Council meeting. luFIRE,• F _ ` City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.00-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Teen Court is a volunteer program which allows juvenile misdemeanor offenders an alternative to the criminal justice system while allowing them an opportunity to assume responsibility for their own actions; and, WHEREAS, Teen Court brings juvenile offenders to a jury of their peers and to the community for constructive punishment which will provide the youths with an understanding of the judicial system and a realization of their roles in their community; and, WHEREAS, the Teen Court Advisory Board is comprised of twelve (12) members; two (2) members appointed by each City (Southlake, Grapevine, Colleyville, Trophy Club); and two (2) members appointed by the superintendent of the Carroll Independent School District and two (2) members of the Grapevine/Colleyville School District; and, WHEREAS, the terms of Patsy DuPre (council appointee) and Denise Burkhart (citizen appointee) have expired, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of the resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council desires to appoint the following members to serve on the Teen Court Advisory Board. l . Councilmember Patsy DuPre (two year term to expire 5/2001) 2. Citizen Denise Burkhart (two year term to expire 5/2001) Section 3. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Mayor Rick Stacy Resolution 00-51 June 9, 2000 Page 2 of 2 ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary d:\wp-files\citysec\resolu\99-50.doc City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 1, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sean Leonard, Court Administrator Ext. 832 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. #784, First Reading Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund Action Requested: Approval and Adoption of Ordinance No. #784. Background Information: During the 76`h Legislative session, Senate Bill #601 was passed amending article 102.0172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize the City of Southlake to create by ordinance a Municipal Court Technology Fund. A defendant convicted of a misdemeanor may be required to pay a fee not to exceed $4 as a municipal court cost. If a person receives probation or deferred adjudication, or if the court defers final disposition of the case, the defendant is considered convicted. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for the municipal court. These enhancements may include computer systems, computer networks, computer hardware, imaging systems, electronic kiosks, electronic ticket writers and docket management systems. Please be aware that this article expires September 1, 2005. Financial Considerations: Based on the current trend of citation issuance, it is estimated that the collection of this fund could result in the collection of $150,000.00 to $200,000.00 of revenues to the City of Southlake before this article expires in September 1, 2005. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any board review. Legal Review: The City Attorney Rob Allibon has reviewed the mandated state requirements and created the attached document. Alternatives: None Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. #784 5G-I Billy Campbell, City Manager June 9, 2000 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Place Ordinance No. #784, on the 20`h day of June, 2000 City Council agenda for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 784 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF A MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FEE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to establish a Municipal Court Technology Fund pursuant to Article 102.0172 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. SECTION 1. A. ESTABLISHMENT OF MUNICIPAL COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND (1) There is hereby created and established a Municipal Court Technology Fund, hereinafter referred to as the "Fund," pursuant to Article 102.0172, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. (2) The Fund may be maintained in an interest -bearing account and may be maintained in the general revenue account. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION (1) The fee shall be in the amount of four dollars. (2) The fee shall be assessed and collected from the defendant upon conviction for a misdemeanor offense in the City of Southlake Municipal Court as a cost of court. A defendant is considered convicted if: MuniCtTechFund.do (l8-2S99) Pepe 1 5G-3 (a) a sentence is imposed on the person; (b) the person is placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision; or (c) the court defers final disposition of the person's case. (3) The fee shall be collected on conviction for an offense committed on or after September 1, 1999. (4) The Court Clerk shall collect the fee and pay the fee to the Finance Director of the City of Southlake, who shall deposit the fee into the Municipal Court Technology Fund. C. DESIGNATED USE OF THE FUND AND ADMINISTRATION (1) The Fund shall be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for the Municipal Court of the City of Southlake, Texas, including: (a) computer systems; (b) computer networks; (c) computer hardware; (d) computer software; (e) imaging systems; (f) electronic kiosks; (g) electronic ticket writers; or (h) docket management systems. (2) The Fund shall be administered by or under the direction of the City Council of the City of Southlake. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, MuniClTeehFund.doe(08-25-99) Page 2 5G-'} clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. SECTION 4. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 5. In accordance with Article 102.0172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this ordinance and the assessment and collection of the Municipal Court Technology fee expires September 1, 2005. The purpose of the use of any funds remaining in the Fund shall continue to be used and administered as required by this ordinance and for that purpose this ordinance remains in effect. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. Mun]CtTechFund.doc(M25.99) Pape 3 5 G-5 PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney MuniCtTechFund.doc(1S-25-99) Page 4 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 1, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sean Leonard, Court Administrator Ext. 832 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. #785, First Reading, Providing For an Increase in Warrant Fees Action Requested: Repeal Ordinance No. #366 relating to the fee for the issuance and service of a warrant of arrest and approval of Ordinance No. #785. Background Information: Financial Considerations: Citizen Input/ Board Review: When a sworn complaint or affidavit based on probable cause has been filed before the municipal court, the judge may issue a warrant for the arrest and /or detention of the accused. During the 76' Texas legislative session, Senate Bill #163 was passed amending Article 102.011(a)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by increasing the fee for executing or processing an issued Warrant of Arrest or Capias Pro Fine warrant from $35.00 to $50.00. The approval and implementation of this fee could result in the collection of an estimated $15,000.00 to 45,000.00 per year in additional revenues to the City of Southlake. No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any board review. Legal Review: Upon review of Ordinance No. #366, City Attorney Rob Allibon recommends that Ordinance No. #366 should be repealed so as to allow the City Manager in conjunction with the Municipal Court Clerk to administratively set and establish the amount of the warrant fee as established by law. He has reviewed and approved the attached document for City Council consideration. Alternatives: The City Council may approve the proposed ordinance as submitted or they may deny or recommend a different amount (not to exceed $50.00 per warrant) as they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. #785. Staff Recommendation: Place Ordinance No. #785, on the 20'*H day of June, 2000 City Council Agenda for consideration. ORDINANCE NO.785 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 366 RELATING TO THE FEE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF A WARRANT OF ARREST; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake in Ordinance No. 366 established a fee not to exceed Twenty -Five Dollars ($25.00) for the issuance and service of a warrant of arrest pursuant to the authority granted by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature may from time to time increase the fee for the issuance and service of a warrant of arrest; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to repeal Ordinance No. 366 to allow the City Manager in conjunction with the Municipal Court Clerk to administratively set and establish the amount of the warrant fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 366 of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the city of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such wamintordinance060900.doc (10/12/99)Page 1 5 H -C21111 ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 12000. warranlordinanca060900.doc(1Oil 2/99)Page 2 SR-3 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney wartantordinance060900.doc (10/12199)Page 3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 1, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sean Leonard, Court Administrator Ext. 832 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. #783, First Reading, Providing for the Amendment of Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances Relating to Municipal Court of Record Action Requested: Approval and Adoption of Ordinance No. #783. Background Information: During the 70' Texas legislative session, House Bill #731 was passed amending Chapter 30 of the Government Code to standardize and make applicable a uniform set of policies and procedures for all municipal courts of record. Because prior law permitted courts of record to be established through state law, the Government Code contained a separate set of policies, rules, and procedures for each municipal court of record created by the statute. As a result, the rules and procedures were not uniform. This legislative mandate streamlined the qualifications, duties, salaries, powers, terms, selection, and removal of judges of municipal courts of record and their clerks which in turn must be codified by the City of Southlake. Highlights of the ordinance include appointments, compensation and term limits of the judges. Appointments of the Court Clerk, court personnel and court reporter and establishment of a court seal and transcript preparation fee. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any board review. Legal Review: The City Attorney Rob Allibon has reviewed the mandated state requirements and created the attached document for City Council approval. Alternatives: The City Council has the discretion to set the term limits of the judge(s) to either a two (2) or four (4) year term. The current format of this ordinance recommends a four (4) year appointment. Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. #783 51--1 Billy Campbell, City Manager Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Place Ordinance No. #783, on the 20' day of June, 2000 City Council agenda for initial reading. 51-A ORDINANCE NO.783 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 11 OF CHAPTER 8 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RELATING TO MUNICIPAL COURTS OF RECORD; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the 1999 Texas Legislature adopted changes to various provisions of Chapter 30. of the Government Code relating to municipal. courts of .record, making it appropriate to revise Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances, in order to comply with the changes adopted by the 1999 Texas Legislature. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-32A, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-32A. Municipal court designation. The municipal court of record shall be the "Municipal Court of Record in the City of Southlake, Texas". SECTION 2. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-3213, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-32B. Municipal court jurisdiction. MunicipelCourtOrdimnce.doc 5�.3 The municipal court of record in the City of Southlake has the jurisdiction provided by Section 30.00005 of the Government Code. SECTION 3. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by amending Section 8-33, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-33. Judges —appointment. The judges of the municipal court of record in the City of Southlake shall be appointed by the city council. A judge who was elected or appointed before September 1, 1999 continues in office until the end of the current term. SECTION 4. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by amending Section 8-35, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-35. Same —qualifications. A municipal judge of the municipal court of record in the City of Southlake must: 1. be a resident of this state; 2. be a citizen of the United States; 3. be a licensed attorney in good standing; and 4. have two or more years of experience in the practice of law in this state. A person may not serve as a municipal judge if the person is employed by the City of Southlake. A municipal judge who accepts employment with the city vacates the judicial office. MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 2 SECTION S. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-35A, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-35A. Same —compensation. The city council shall set the salary of the municipal judge of the municipal court of record in the City of Southlake. The amount of the judge's salary may not be diminished during the judge's term of office. The salary may not be based directly or indirectly on fines, fees, or costs collected by the Court. SECTION 6. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-3513, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-35B. Same —supervision and control of the court. The municipal judge shall supervise and control the operation and clerical functions of the administrative department of the municipal court, including the court's personnel, during the proceedings or docket of the court. At all other times, the operation and clerical functions of the administrative department of the municipal court shall be under the supervision and direction of the court clerk. SECTION 7. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-35C, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-35C. Same —term. The term of an appointed municipal judge for the municipal court of record in the City of Southlake is four years from the date of appointment. MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 3 5�.-5 SECTION 8. 4W That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-35D, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-35D. Same —vacancies. If a vacancy occurs in the office of a municipal judge of a court of record, the city council shall by ordinance appoint a qualified person to fill the office for the remainder of the unexpired term. The city council may appoint one or more qualified persons to be available to serve for a municipal judge who is temporarily absent due to illness, family death, continuing legal or judicial education programs, or any other reason. The municipal judge shall select one of the qualified persons appointed by the city council to serve during the absence of the municipal judge. The substitute judge, while serving as a municipal judge, has all the powers and shall discharge all the duties of a municipal judge. A substitute judge must meet the qualifications prescribed for the municipal judge. The city council shall set the compensation for the substitute judge. SECTION 9. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by amending Section 8-36, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-36. Appointment of court clerk and court personnel. The city manager shall appoint a clerk of the municipal court of record, who shall be known as the municipal court clerk. The municipal court clerk shall keep the records of the municipal court of record, issue process, and generally perform the duties of a clerk of a county court at law exercising criminal jurisdiction. In the annual budget, the city council may provide deputy clerks, warrant officers, and other personnel as needed MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doe PAGE 4 for the proper operation of the municipal court of record. During proceedings of the court, the clerk and court personnel shall serve at the direction of the municipal court judge. At all other times they shall serve at the direction and supervision of the court clerk who shall have the authority to remove the court personnel according to rules set forth in the city's personnel policies. SECTION 10. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by amending Section 8-37, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-37. Court reporter. The municipal court clerk shall appoint a court reporter who must meet the qualifications provided by law for official court reporters. The court reporter or court staff may use written notes, transcribing equipment, video or audio recording equipment, or a combination of those methods to record the proceedings of the court. The court reporter or court staff are not required to record testimony in any case unless the judge or one of the parties requests a record in writing, and files the request with the court before trial. If a record is made, it shall be kept for the 20 day period beginning the day after the last day of the court proceeding, trial or denial of motion for new trial, whichever occurs last. The court reporter is not required to be present during proceedings of the municipal court of record, provided that proceedings that are required to be recorded are recorded by a good quality electronic recording device. If a case is appealed, the proceedings shall be transcribed from the recording by an official court reporter. MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 5 51-_q SECTION 11. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-41, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-41. Seal. The court clerk is directed to acquire a seal in conformance with State law for the municipal court of record in the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 12. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-42, which shall read as follows: Sec.8-42. Jury. The court clerk shall supervise the selection of persons for jury service in the municipal court of record. SECTION 13. That Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas is hereby amended by the addition of Section 8-43, which shall read as follows: Sec. 8-43. Transcript preparation fee. In the event of an appeal, the appellant shall pay a transcript preparation fee in the amount of $25. The transcript preparation fee does not include the fee for an actual transcript of the proceedings. The clerk shall note the payment of the fee on the docket of the court. If the case is reversed on appeal, the fee shall be refunded to the appellant. In addition to the transcript preparation fee, the fee for the actual transcript of the proceedings and statement of facts must be paid by the appellant. MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 6 5T--8 SECTION 14. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 15. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 16. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 2000. MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 7 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 5 j::-q PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney MUNICIPAL COURT ORDINANCE.doc PAGE 8 5T--io City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell. City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, :assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line Action Requested: Approve Resolution 00-64 authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. Background Information: The Trinity River Authority (TRA) is the agency that treats the City's wastewater. The City is divided into two drainage basins, which are the north and south basins. The sanitary sewer that is generated from the north basin is pumped by a series of lift stations to the TRA Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Roanoke. The sanitary sewer generated from the south basin flows by gravity to the TRA Central Wastewater Treatment Plant in Grand Prairie. The treatment plants are designed based on the drainage area that each serves. The City is diverting sewer from the north basin to the south basin in two areas of the City. The City has a diversion agreement with TRA to allow such diversion until November 2000. The City is in the process of constructing sanitary sewer improvements to eliminate the diversion in one of the two areas. There is one project that has not been awarded to a contractor to construct improvements to eliminate the diversion in the z other area. This project is the construction of an 18" sanitary sewer line along N. Carroll from the Dove Creek lift station to the existing N-3 gravity line (see project map). The construction plans for this project are complete and the City is acquiring the necessary two easements to construct this project. The City has reached a verbal agreement with one of the property owners (Hight property) for an easement. The City has made several attempts to acquire the easement from the other property owner, Mr. & Mrs. James Haltom, to no avail. The City must move forward to acquire this easement in order to meet the November 2000 deadline in the TRA Diversion Agreement. Therefore, staff recommends implementing condemnation proceedings to acquire the easement. This resolution is the first step to 5J - 1 City of Southlake, Texas implement the condemnation proceedings. The condemnation proceedings will be halted if an agreement can be made with the Haltom's r within the next couple of weeks. Financial Considerations: The City will have the property appraised to estimate the fair market value of the easement. The City will be required to pay the appraisal cost, which will be between $1200-$2500. The City will be required to pay the property owner fair market value for the easement. Additionally, if the condemnation action proceeds to the Commissioner's Court, the City will incur attorney's fees and possible consulting fees from the appraiser, engineer, etc. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not applicable. Legal Review: The attorneys representing the City recommend approval of a resolution to proceed with all condemnation actions. Alternatives: Staff recommends moving forward with the condemnation action proceedings. If all efforts are exhausted to obtain an agreement with the Haltom's, the City will proceed with filing the action with the Commissioner's Court to condemn the easement. Supporting Documents: Project Map Resolution 00-64 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution 00-64 authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility line easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. Please place this item on the June 20, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for approval. `SEP/sep 5J-2 HALTOM CONDEMNATION PROJECT MAP a 0 RESOLUTION NO.00-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS AUTHOR0NG THE CITY ATTORNEY TO BRING A CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR USE BY THE CITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SANITARY SEWER LINE OR FOR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES PERMITTED BY LAW WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is in the process of constructing an 18" gravity sanitary sewer line along N. Carroll from the Dove Creek lift station to the N-3 gravity sanitary sewer line to serve the residents of Southlake, (the "Project") which will serve existing developments in the city; and WHEREAS, in order to complete construction of the Project, it is necessary for the city to acquire easements from property owners who own land across which the Project will be located; and WHEREAS, the city and the owner of one of said properties, James C. & Brenda J. Haltom of Southlake, have been unable fD reach an agreement on the acquisition of this easement; and WHEREAS, the city council now deems it necessary to authorize the city attomey to initiate condemnation proceedings in order to acquire the necessary easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The city attorney is hereby authorized to bring a condemnation lawsuit for the purpose of acquiring a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement; being more particularly described on the exhibit attached hereto. SECTION 2. The city council finds that such acquisition in this condemnation action is necessary in order to serve the public health, safety and welfare. PASSED, APPROVED and EFFECTIVE this day of .2000. mAwd-files*kseweAduve creek Is aban hallom condemn resolution.doc Mayor, City of Southlake 5J-4 Page (W." ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 0 I (amw mAwd-fileslco6ewerWwe creek Is eban haftom condemn resoMlon.doc i i Page 2 0 Eq L Lq- SaIVIS3 ' I A I � ►— aW I I C 1 Z Ch W 'cc C2 I W C� H I S! t2w U) j I ' ~ (n W Q I �� WF�— W z I� cc J W Q U Cb I Z) ' A `0 to W = M Z Z as a i� �� : it W O I E• • Aa TT fY. eo q IZai b L, g a W k W >— g" i O �4* Z aQ I a Ro W ---- � W 06 Zgg I I � z-„ca I HnNHAV Z'TOURVO H.L)ION 5J-6 NN _ g JW Q U N Q 0 e EXHIBIT 'B' 15' PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT Field Notes Being a 0.4096 acre tract of land in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being a 15 foot wide strip of land, over, through, and across a 20.543 acre tract conveyed to James C. and Brenda J. Haltom, as recorded in Volume 12297, page 829, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod found at the most southerly southwest comer said Haltom tract, and being the southeast comer of a 1.17 acre tract conveyed to Lance B. Hight as recorded by deed in Vol.12720, page 2352, also being in the northerly line of Whispering Dell Estates as recorded in Volume 388-143, page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00037' 10" W, along a westerly line of said Haltom tract, also being the easterly line of said Hight tract, a distance of 15.00 feet; THENCE N 89052'48" E, parallel with the southerly line of said Haltom tract and the northerly line of said Whispering Dell Estates, distance of 1189.45 feet to the easterly line of said Haltom tract: THENCE S 00°49'05" E, along the easterly line of said Haltom tract, a distance of 15.00 feet to the southeast corner of said Haltom tract, also being the northeast corner of said Whispering Dell Estates; LW THENCE S 89052'48" W, along the southerly line of said Haltom tract, and the ~� northerly line of said Whispering Dell Estates, a distance of 1189.51 feet to the Point Of Beginning, containing 0.4096 acre of land or 17,842 square feet of land, more or less, of which 0.3374 acre of land or 14,697 square feet of land lies within an existing Utility Easement as recorded in Deed Volume 12297, page 831. Also included will be a Temporary Construction Easement as shown on Exhibit "A". GA00I-438kasemenWhaitom.doc 5J-7 t City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Takeover Agreement with Amwest Surety Insurance Company for the completion of sanitary sewer installation in Jellico Estates Addition Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Takeover Agreement with Amwest Surety Insurance Company for the completion of sanitary sewer installation in Jellico Estates Addition. Background Information: On February 2,1999, the City Council awarded the contract for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Jellico Estates Addition to Everspan, Inc. in the amount of $374,723.00. The construction proceeded for the next several months until the project was almost completed. In February 2000, the City received notice that Everspan, Inc. had gone into bankruptcy. The city staff immediately began to communicate with the surety company, Amwest Surety Insurance Company, to get the remaining construction completed. The work remaining is basically completing the items listed on a "punch list" for correction or completion. Amwest Surety Insurance Company -has requested that the City enter into a Takeover Agreement with them prior to the completion of the work to be done on this project. This is a typical agreement between the owner and the surety re -stating the responsibilities of each in the completion of this contract. Financial Considerations: There is no extra cost to the City for this takeover. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City Attorney has reviewed this Takeover Agreement and recommends that it be executed by the City. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Agreement Map Exhibit IN 0 TAKEOVER AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into the — day of 2000, betveen A�,%1`vVEST SURETY INSURANCE C0110PANY ("Amwest") a Nebraska corporation, and The City of Southlake (Owner") On or about February 25, 1999, Owner and Everspan Building Systems, Inc., ("CONTRACTOR") entered into a contract (the "Contract") for construction of work described as: Sanitary Sewer Improvements to Serve Jellico Estate. (the "Project"). AMWEST executed a performance bond # 1378615 in the penal sum of $374,723.00 and a payment bond #1378615 in the penal sum of $374,723.00, both in favor of Contractor as principal On or about February 10, 2000 Contractor abandoned the project and filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy protection. Owner has made demand upon Amwest under the provisions and conditions of the performance bond to takeover and assume responsibility for completion of the project. The Surety has elected to undertake to perform and complete the Construction Contract through its agents, or through an Independent contractor, namely, . provided the entire unpaid balance of the Contract price is paid to Amwest by Owner in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract. The adjusted Contract Price based upon the original estimated quantities is $363,287.00, and the unpaid balance of the Contract Price, including retainage still held by Owner is S7,265.74. NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Amwest agrees to complete the contract work in accordance with the plans, specifications, and contract documents. Owner acknowledges Amwest is acting in its capacity as the Surety for the Contractor and, as such, assumes no obligation or liability other than as set forth in its bonds. 2. Owner will pay, upon completion of the Project, the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Price in the amount of $7,265.74, together with all additional amounts which may be added by approved Change Orders to Amwest as the work progresses. It is understood this is a unit price contract based upon estimated quantities. Owner agrees to pay Amwest the unit prices contained in the contract for the final quantities installed, less any sums paid to Contractor. Owner shall not retain from the Contract balance any damages alleged to have been caused to Owner by reason of Contractor's failure to complete the work in a timely manner or otherwise. Owner will pay the unpaid balance of the Contract Price to Amwest in accordance with the terms of the Contract 5K-3 as to time, amounts, and methods of payment. Such funds shall be paid to Amwest or to such other persons as Amwest may direct in writing from time to time. 3. Owner shall not viithhold payment of any amount on account of liens or other claims filed against the protect. Amwest agrees to promptly investigate claims made against its payment bond and pay said claims in accordance with the bond and applicable law. 4. Owner agrees that Amwest and its agents and contractors shall have the right to use, without charge, any materials, supplies, equipment, or personal property furnished or supplied to Contractor which are stored on the premises of the Project or which may have been fabricated for use in connection with the Project, whether or not presently upon the Project. 5. Amwest shall not be obligated for an aggregate amount in excess of the penal sum of the Bonds issued by it. Amwest, by execution of this Agreement, does not waive, modify or extend the penal limit of the Bonds issued by it. Any payment made by Amwest out of its own funds to complete the project or to satisfy unpaid subcontractors or suppliers, shall reduce the penal sum of the respective Bond by the same amount. Amwest may cause any further work performed on its behalf in the completion of the Contract to cease when Amwest has expended the full amount of the penal sum of the Performance Bond. In no event shall Amwest be obligated to pay any amount in excess of the penal limit of the bonds issued by it. 6. Owner and Amwest agree that day to day coordination of the work to be performed under the Contract shall be managed between Amwest's designated completion contractor and the Architect or the Owner's designated representative as provided in the Contract. Amwest may designate a third person to represent its interests and Owner agrees to cooperate with Amwest's designated representative in providing any information concerning performance of the Contract. Amwest may provide a representative on the job site but if it does not do so all oral or written communications from Owner to Amwest shall be made to: Mr. Jeff Hodges Horizon Business Resources, Inc 330 Primrose Road, Suite # 204 Burlingame, CA. 94010-4026 (650) 685 —9559 with a copy to: Mr. Daniel J. Dziuba Horizon Business Resources, Inc. 3116 Kellway Drive, Suite 110 Carrollton, TX. 75006-2519 (972) 248-6646 2 5K-4 7. Any written or oral notice to the Owner shall be given to: M,-. David Fleming, P.E. City of Southlake 1950 East Continental Southlake, TX. 76092 (817) 481-5581 8. The parties shall mutually cooperate to ensure smooth transition in the work. 9. Amwest shall be entitled to time extensions in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Contract. Owner agrees to waive the assessment and collection of liquidated damages that might otherwise be assessable as a result of the work of the original Contractor and the time necessary to complete the work, provided Amwest fulfills its obligation hereunder to arrange for completion of the work. Amwest agrees to exercise its best effort to complete all contract work within 30 calendar days, subject to additional extensions of time as provided in the original contract. 10. Amwest shall remain liable under its payment bond to all subcontractors and material suppliers to Contractor in connection with the Contract, it's bond, and applicable law. 11. This Agreement shall not be deemed or construed to be an admission or concession of liability of any nature or kind by Amwest or Owner. This Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any claims as between Owner and Amwest under the Contract and Performance Bond, all of which rights and claims are specifically reserved. 12. To the extent AMWEST will pay amounts to its completion contractor, or to pay suppliers of the original Contractor, in excess of the contract revenue it receives, and to the extent Amwest thereby incurs a loss, Owner hereby subrogates to Amwest, and does hereby assign, convey, set over and transfer to Amwest, any and all rights, claims, interest, causes of action, demands and/or claims in bankruptcy which Owner has, had, or may be entitled to assert against the original Contractor in connection with the contract, and expressly agrees Amwest may but is not obligated to pursue such rights, claims, interests, causes of actions, demands and/or claims in bankruptcy in Owner's name or otherwise, to the extent that Amwest, in its sole discretion, deems advisable. 13. If requested, Owner will make available for copying and inspection by Amwest or its completion contractor; (i) all contract survey data in its possession that OWNER is required to provide by the terms of the contract; and (ii) a complete log report of all shop drawings and material submissions previously received by OWNER and/or the designated architects, engineers or agents. 3 5K-5 14. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except by a written document duly executed by the parties or their successors. This Agreement is binding upon the parties hereto, their representatives, successors and assigns, provided, however, that no rights shall accrue hereunder to or for the use or benefit of any person or entity other than the parties hereto, their respective successors or assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall be applied and interpreted in a manner consistent with each other so as to carry out the purposes and intent of the parties. If for any reason any provision is unenforceable or invalid, such provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the remaining provisions shall be carried out with the same force and effect as if the severed provision had not been a part of this Agreement. EXECUTED as of the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BY: Name: Title: AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY L-1"V Name: Title: 4 5K-6 I I «I ✓731 c ETVI ' I i SCALE 1"= 400'(APPROX) > D r,-, E6 m v I v l ' I PROPOSED LIFT c TATION C7 I I I I I 00 n Iv a' PR (POSE s I $ L PROPC 1SED 4' FORC�3M , N I WEST CI IJELLICo I V%� I RCLE I z �' z — -1 �01 I i oo z r Nj _ T ` e I CIR LE I AST JELIICO • .S. I v P OP `E �6 I I �? PROP ` N I I C{ cn I i I SS - NJ VIZ I I I I Al ICO ES' TE& , 5K-7 S - � City of Southlake, Texas i i i MEMORANDUM June 8. 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Commercial Developer's Agreement for Southlake Crossing Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 & 6 (Hobby Lobby) Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Commercial Developer's Agreement for Southlake Crossing Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 & 6 (Hobby Lobby). Background Information: The plat for Southlake Crossing Phase II, block 1, Lots 5 & 6 was approved in July, 1995. The site plan for Hobby Lobby (Southlake Marketplace Phase 3) which is on Lots 5 & 6, was approved on January 18, 2000. This Developer's Agreement covers the construction of on -site public water and sanitary sewer lines. Financial Considerations: There is a park fee of $5,050. When the property was platted in 1995, the Park Fee was $500 per acre and the site consists of 10.1 acres. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: This developer agreement is our standard agreement, originally drafted by City Attorneys. Alternatives: Approve it, deny it, or modify it. Supporting Documents: Developer Agreement Plat Exhibit 5L-1 Staff Recommendation: Place the on the June 20, 2000 City Council agenda for Council consideration and approval. Charlie J. Th mas City Engineer m 4: 72 ' SOUTHLAKE CN° ss 0'i' COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of Southlake Crossing Phase 11, Block 1, Lots 5 & 6 (Hobby Lobby), hereinafter referred to as "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the Addition (a commercial development) and to the off -site improvements necessary to support the Addition. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best -rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. - These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for Commercial Developer Agreement 1 5L-3 a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the Addition. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by the City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned herein above which are intended to be public facilities shall be vested in the City, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, the City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire Agreement shall occur at such time that the City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved, and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water , street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; C. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; Commercial Developer Agreement 2 5L-4 e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard),- b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and C. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said Addition which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the Addition so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Commercial Developer Agreement 3 5L-5 L The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES A. ON -SITE WATER The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the Director of Public Works, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA and TNRCC requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. Commercial Developer Agreement 4 5L-6 C. STREETS The street construction in the Addition will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the Director of Public Works. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; or an agreement with utility provider stating that no charge will be made for street lights for the two-year duration. b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the Addition, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means, the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 2. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre -planned facilities. Commercial Developer Agreement 5 5L-7 It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. E. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this Addition. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the Addition. Commercial Developer Agreement 6 5L-8 F. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans to be stamped "Released for Construction" by the Director of Public Works must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer Agreement must be executed. Commercial Developer Agreement 7 5L-9 5. The Developer, or Contractor, shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co- insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A Pre -Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub -Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. Commercial Developer Agreement 8 5L-10 C. Approval by the Director of Public Works or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the Director of Public Works signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This Agreement or any part herein, or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his or her own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. Commercial Developer Agreement 9 5L-11 F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. OFF -SITE DRAINAGE B. OFF -SITE SEWER C. OFF -SITE WATER D. PARK FEES The Developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of $500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0. There are approximately � acres in the Addition, which would bring the total cost of Park Fees to , , E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address: Commercial Developer Agreement 10 5L-12 STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS in Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: Commercial Developer Agreement 11 5L-13 (SEAL) REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letters of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. Commercial Developer Agreement 12 5L-14 -ra Y°y�aaLIY i=a3?�3 9� n r �F�� T Z F t X 3 ii+ :.^ _3s, }'�.n�� �ax•��. � 1pSrc is g n 4n s M _ni7� :- 5.- S: i3 pp a 3�S �' ¢ $ xr •' r:��r ko � . ! 4 i;g3: Ye Y'g$ s G' H M! S.1 ...;� 4 o HR9-� '�i�, '� i o y p x ;a e► ■ MliMill l x1,:3• I Y��'���=30' 3 �$8_ } Y �fx}}$- s � 2�i QB s ` i g } ; a = = ie i =� 4�f ►� a Hilo.: ea 5�➢}. i�a de8$" H a :- a5 -: s s L :k p ; o = ot.� 9 n 5L-15 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 16, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting June 20. Note that in your packet last week Ordinance No. 783, Municipal Court of Record was presented as a consent item it has now been moved to a discussion item. The city manager,s notes on this item are included under Item No. 1 1A. Agenda Item No. 5A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held June 6, 2000. If you have any changes to the minutes, please discuss these at the work session or notify Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting. She will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration. Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 00-63, Amending the Employee Handbook to include the Family Medical Leave Policy. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) This policy establishes the procedures the City has operated under to comply with the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA ) of 1993. This policy outlines the requirements of the FMLA, which allows eligible employees to take job-protected leave for up to 12 workweeks in any 12 months because of the birth or adoption of a child, a serious health condition of a member of the employee's family, or a serious health condition of the employee's. The policy also enables an employee on FMLA leave to maintain health benefits while on leave as if the employee were not taking leave. Additionally, an employee generally has a right to return to the same position or an equivalent position with equivalent pay, benefits and working conditions at the conclusion of the leave. Contact Lauren Safranek with questions on this item. Agenda Item No. 5C. Approval of a professional services agreement with Belcheff& Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the North Pearson Lane/Pecan Acres Addition. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 2 of 28 packet.) As part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, the City Council has approved funding for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and the North Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. A project map for each neighborhood is included in the memo from Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe. Staff has received a proposal from Belcheff & Associates to engineer and design the sanitary sewer for the aforementioned neighborhoods. The proposal totals $48,573, which is below the $62,820 allocated in the CIP budget. The City has polled the residents in Hillside Estates and found that approximately 81% supported installation of the sewer. Funds have been appropriated in the CIP budget to for this project. Once the design of the sewer for Hillside Estates is complete, staff will advertise for construction bids. Staff has yet to poll the residents along North Pearson and in the Pecan Acres Addition because the construction of the sewer is not scheduled until FY00-01. However, staff recommends proceeding with the design work. If the poll later determines that a majority of the residents oppose the sewer, Council may choose not to proceed with construction. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 5D. Approval of a professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet; however, note the additional comment italicized below.) Each fiscal year, the City Council has approved funding to engineer and construct sanitary sewer to serve certain neighborhoods currently on septic systems as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. The City Council has approved funding to engineer the sanitary sewer to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. There is a project map of each subdivision included in the memo by Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe. A professional services agreement has been obtained from Cheatham & Associates in the amount of $47,950 to design the sanitary sewer to serve the aforementioned neighborhoods, which is below the $100,410 appropriated in the CIP budget. The difference from CIP budget estimates and the amount Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 3 of 28 from Cheatham & Associates is primarily because existing survey information will be used that has previously been performed by the engineer for other projects in the areas of the neighborhoods. City surveys show overwhelming support from the residents in Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates, and a slight majority in the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. (results are tabulated in the memo from Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe). Following design of the sanitary sewer for these neighborhoods, the City will proceed with the construction of the sewer for Hunter's Ridge and Randol Mill Estates. Construction of the sewer for Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition is not scheduled until FY00-01. Recall that construction of this project was originally budgeted in the FY99-00 CIP budget. However, the money appropriated in the FY99-00 CIP budget for Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition sewer were used to fund the cost overrun of the Cross Timber Hills sewer project. Thus, funds have to be budgeted in the FY00-01 CIP budget for construction of this project. Due to the lack of interest of residents, Council may choose to delay the design and/or construction of the sewer to serve the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. If Council chooses to delay the design of this project, the professional service agreement can be approved excluding the Timberline/Woodsey sewer project. If so, the professional service contract amount would be two- thirds the proposed amount. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 5E. Resolution No. 00-67, Authorizing the Director of Public Safety to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City Vehicles. On April 18, 1989, Resolution No. 89-24, was approved by the City Council, authorizing Police Chief James W. Campbell to sign the forms required to be submitted for registration requesting regular license plates for exempt vehicles. Due to the fact that the Chief of Police is no longer James W. Campbell, a new resolution must be submitted to the Department of Transportation in order to obtain regular license plates for exempt vehicles, as requested by Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson. It was suggested by the Department of Transportation that this new Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 4 of 28 resolution state only the titles authorized to submit the applications for exempt plates so the City would not need to pass a new resolution each time a new Director of Public Safety is hired. Agenda Item No. 5F. Resolution No. 00-51, Changing terms for Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board members. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) The Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board functions to advise the Teen Court Program of the needs of each of the represented entities. The City Council discussed changing the terms of the City of Southlake's appointments to the Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board at the May 2 Council meeting. Councilmember DuPre lead the discussion based on her recommendations for this change. The City Council now will vote on changing from one-year to two-year terms. Contact Monica Broadhurst or Councilmember DuPre with questions on this item. Agenda Item No. 5G. Ordinance No. 784, 1s` Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 601 was passed amending article 102.0172 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to create a Municipal Court Technology Fund by which a defendant would be required to pay a $4 fee if convicted of a Class C Misdemeanor offense. The money collected by the Municipal Court Clerk must be deposited in a Municipal Court Technology Fund and may be used only to finance the purchase of technological enhancements for municipal court. Refer to the memo prepared by Sean Leonard for examples of technological enhancements. Based on the current trend of citation issuance, it is estimated that collection of this fund could result in $150,000 to $200,000 in revenue to the City before this article expires in Sept. 1, 2005. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. Agenda Item No. 5H. Ordinance No. 785, Is` Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 163 was passed amending article 102.011(a)(2) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures. This new law allows the City of Southlake to increase the fee for executing an arrest warrant from $35 to $50 per apprehension. The approval and implementation of this fee could result Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 5 of 28 in the collection of an estimated $15,000 to $45,000 per year in additional revenue to the City that would be deposited in the General Fund to help cover operating costs (i.e. warrant officers, court personnel, etc.). Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. Agenda Item No. 5I. Ordinance No. 480-342, 151 Reading, ZA (00-16), Rezoning Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C, W. R. Eaves Survey, A500, 1.349 acres. This site is located south of the Walgreen's on the west side of South Peytonville Avenue. The zoning change is being made to comply with a commitment made to the City Council by the Walgreen's developer. They do not have a user for the property and have requested deferral of the plan requirement. It should be noted that prior to issuance of any building permit a Site Plan must be approved by the City Council. On May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0). Contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough regarding this item. Agenda Item No. 5J. Approval of Resolution 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet; however, note the additional comment italicized below.) This resolution is the first step to implement condemnation proceedings for an easement on property owned by Mr. & Mrs. James Haltom. This easement is required in order to construct an 18" gravity sanitary sewer line. Once construction of this sewer line is complete, the lift station on North Carroll at Dove Creek will be abandoned. The lift station currently diverts the sewage from the north drainage basin to the south drainage basin. The City's agreement with the Trinity River Authority (TRA) that allows diversion of sewage from the north basin to the south basin, expires in November 2000. The City will be subject to monetary charges each month after November 2000 until the diversion of sewage is eliminated. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 6 of 28 The proposed 18" gravity sanitary sewer line along Carroll is the last project that has to be constructed to eliminate the diversion. Up until June 16, 2000, Staff has attempted to meet with the Haltom's on several occasions to discuss the easement. However, Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe finally met with Mr. Haltom on June 16, 2000. Mr. Haltom is willing to dedicate the easement on the condition that the City waives the impact fee for five single-family homes. Normally, the City waives the impact fee for one single-family home. Although this request is not without precedent, Staff will discuss the Haltom counter-offer with you in Executive Session. Mr. Haltom conveyed to Shawn Poe that he is in the process of selling the land to a developer. If an agreement cannot be reached in the next couple of weeks, staff will have the easement appraised. Once the easement is appraised, the City will file the action with the Commissioner's Court to condemn the easement. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 5K. Authorize the Mayor to execute a Takeover Agreement for the completion of sanitary sewer improvements in Jellico Estates Addition with Amwest Surety Insurance. (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) The City Council awarded the contract for sanitary sewer installation in Jellico Estates to Everspan Inc. The construction proceeded almost to completion when the contractor, Everspan, Inc. declared bankruptcy. City staff has been in communication with the bonding company for the past few months regarding completion of the contract. The bonding company has submitted a "Takeover Agreement" to the City Attorney to cover the remaining work to be done. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and recommends that the agreement be executed so that the surety company can complete the contract. This agreement basically restates the condition parameters of the original contract with Everspan, Inc. There is no additional cost to the City of Southlake for the takeover by the surety to complete the contract. Most of the work to be done is cleanup and "punch list" items. Contact Charlie Thomas with questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 7 of 28 Agenda Item No. 5L. Authorize the Mayor to execute a developer agreement for Southlake Crossing Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 and 6 (Hobby Lobby). (There were no changes to this item from your off-week packet.) Southlake Crossing Phase II was platted in 1995 on the southeast corner of FM 1709 and Davis Boulevard. It has been developed in phases with Albertson's and others. The last phase now is being developed with the construction of Hobby Lobby. There are public water and sanitary sewer lines to be constructed on site. The site plan for Hobby Lobby was approved on January 18, 2000. In 1995, when the plat was approved, the Park Fee was $500 per acre and the fee did not have to be approved by the Park Board; therefore, there is no Park Board recommendation included with the Developer's Agreement. This is a standard developer's agreement with no special issues. Contact Charlie Thomas if you have questions. Agenda Item No. 5M. Recognize and appoint Recon, Zurka and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division. This item appoints three canine positions established by resolution No. 92-33. The Department of Public Safety established a canine program in July 1992. This program has demonstrated the usefulness of canines for detecting narcotics and apprehending criminal offenders for the past seven years. The canine program has been successful in public relations exhibitions, crime prevention and as an investigative tool. Currently the Department of Public Safety has one active canine (Lugar) appointed in May 1995. DPS has operated two canines on the street since 1992 until recently when one of the canines (Fonzie) suffered a stroke and was retired. The addition of three canines (Gaman, Recon, Zurka) will provide more availability and presence on the street. Each canine is trained and certified through the Mid- South Canine Association and the Texas Canine Association. Contact Garland Wilson for questions or comments. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 8 of 28 Agenda Item No. 7A. ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition. The property is located on the north side of East Continental Boulevard, south of Carroll Avenue and east of Breeze Way. The current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with "CS" Community Service District uses. This property is part of the Versailles Planned Unit Development. You may recall that during the approvals of the Versailles development it was anticipated that this would be a school site. A city park adjoins the east line of this property. The plan proposes a single-story, 79,000-square-foot elementary school. It should be noted that the school district has agreed to provide a common access easement to the park property through the east driveway on Carroll Avenue. There are no significant issues remaining on the staff review. The applicant is requesting a variance with regard to building articulation. School district representatives attended a SPIN meeting prior to this item coming before the P&Z. It is staff's understanding that the results of that meeting were positive and that no significant issues remained. However, during the P&Z meeting, there were a few residents from the Versailles subdivision that had concerns regarding traffic and utilization of Carroll Avenue as the primary access. There also is a resident along the south side of Continental who is concerned with drainage. The City Planning and Engineering staff attended a SPIN meeting on June 3, 2000 to try and answer questions regarding the plan. One of the primary questions asked of staff regarding the traffic is "What factors were considered in determining where the school would front and where their primary points of access would be?" Although the City staff did not dictate the orientation of the school, we have conveyed the following information: South Carroll Avenue is designated as a 4-lane arterial street that should be better equipped to handle traffic than East Continental Boulevard, which is designated as a 3-lane undivided arterial street; Breeze Way is a local street; the City's Driveway Ordinance No. 634 does not permit non-residential driveway access onto local streets unless no other access is available. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 9 of 28 South Carroll Avenue currently exists as only "two lanes" of the ultimate "four-lane" arterial. In reviewing the site plan, the City Engineer recommends that a left turn lane be added in front of the school on South Carroll Avenue. This is necessary because all of the access to the school is off South Carroll Avenue. Also, the City Engineer recommends that CISD be required to construct the remaining three lanes on South Carroll Avenue at the time of the construction of the school to eliminate the need for the City to have to build those lanes at a later date with the school traffic. The site plan shows to only construct one extra lane with the school construction. Possibly, the City could reimburse CISD for the other two lanes. The storm drainage on this site is generally north to south. There is currently an open channel running from South Carroll Avenue south to East Continental Boulevard, then under East Continental through a concrete box culvert and across private property in an open ditch. CISD is required by City ordinances to take the storm water runoff coming to the site and carry it through the property. CISD also is required to detain any of the increased runoff from its developed site if the system downstream will not accommodate it. The system immediately downstream, across private property, will not handle the increased runoff; therefore, CISD must detain their increased runoff or make the necessary downstream improvements to accommodate it. The site plan shows that CISD intends to construct a detention pond within the existing open channel running north and south across the school property to detain the increased runoff plus as much additional runoff as the channel will contain. The channel/detention pond could be replaced with an underground box culvert on the school property with downstream improvements when funds are available in the future. This method of handling the drainage on this site is acceptable by City ordinances. On May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Pamela Muller dissented) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, deleting Item #4 (articulation). Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 10 of 28 On June 6, 2000, the City Council tabled this request so the applicant could reconsider the orientation of the building and location of the driveways. The applicant has submitted an amendment to the site plan showing the following changes: 1) relocating the easternmost driveway on Carroll Avenue approximately 185 feet to the east in order to line up directly with Bordeaux Drive; 2) increasing the number of parking spaces proposed for the easternmost parking lot (13 spaces), while decreasing the number of parallel parking spaces (5 spaces). The net increase from the original site plan is 8 spaces (175 total spaces). Another SPIN meeting was held on Friday, June 9, 2000. Some school board members and city council members were present. The issues of access on Carroll and Breezeway were further discussed at this meeting. If you have any questions regarding the site plan, contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Please contact Charlie Thomas regarding traffic, street and drainage questions. Agenda Item No. 7B. ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition. This is the Preliminary Plat associated with the previous elementary school site plan. There are no significant issues related to the plat. On May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Pamela Muller dissented) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, adding a comment regarding the addition of a common access easement with the park property at the northeast corner. If you have any questions regarding this item contact Dennis Killough. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 11 of 28 Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, ZA 99-078, Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition. The primary purpose of this zoning change and revised plan is to address a proposed natatorium facility on the high school site. The natatorium is proposed on two tracts of land located near the northeast corner of the existing school property. This plan also proposes additional accessory buildings, modification to the track & field area and elimination of the stadium shown on previously approved plans. Its should be noted that "future classroom" options shown on the north side of main school building were part of the previous site plan approval and have not been constructed. The primary concerns regarding this proposal, with both residents and the Commission, have been the height of the natatorium and its proximity to the Stone Lakes residents. There have also been concern regarding location of proposed accessory buildings and landscaping along the south and east property boundaries. A small "lower level" portion of the natatorium was approximately 71' from the Stone Lakes properties on the plan presented to P&Z. The larger portion of the building was approximately 100' from the Stone Lakes properties. At this location the building encroached approximately 10' above the 4:1 slope setback line. CISD has relocated handicap parking to the south side of the natatorium and has moved the building approximately 16' to the west. The district also lowered the height by 2' on the west portion. The closest portion of the building now is approximately 90' from the residents, with the larger portion of the building being approximately 120' from the residents. The building now encroaches the 4:1 slope setback by approximately 4'. The plan presented to P&Z proposed four accessory buildings, two along the east boundary and two along the south boundary. The Commission recommended moving these buildings as far away from the residents as possible. The school now proposes a single accessory building, approximately 40' x 100', located just south of the Activity Center. This revision was a result of meeting with some of the adjacent residents. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 12 of 28 You may recall that variations to the bufferyards were made during approval of the previous site plan for the high school. The bufferyard plantings along the east and south were changed to require mondell pines, equal in cost to the required plant materials. Berming also was required along the south. Due to drainage concerns along the south the berms were not installed, and the City Landscape Administrator has concerns about use of a single plant type. The Staff Review requires that the bufferyards and interior landscape areas comply with the current requirements of City Ordinances. The school has been working with both the residents and the Landscape Administrator on an alternate landscape plan to bring before the Council for approval. However, there are still unresolved issues with both residents and the City Landscape Administrator regarding this plan. If an appropriate plan cannot be established prior to your meeting for first reading, staff would recommend that any action regarding bufferyard/landscape issues, other than requiring current standards, be deferred until second reading. Please refer to the Memo from the Building Division regarding landscape issues included in your packet. On May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Dennis King dissented) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 12, 2000, and subject to the following: 1) Regarding Item #1 (interior landscaping and bufferyards) referencing the Building Dept. Landscape Administrator's Review No. 4, dated May 11, 2000: removing the berms listed as the second #3; regarding #4, requiring all Mondell Pines and instructing the applicant to work with the Landscape Administrator to determine what canopy trees and accent trees would be most appropriate for the south and east areas; regarding #5, the applicant is to mitigate as required the 2,250 inches and defer to the decisions made by the Joint Utilization Committee with respect to the placement, diameter, and number of trees; regarding #6 (previous Site Plan approval) (the IS` bulleted item) with respect to the trees to be placed along Peytonville Avenue the applicant is to install the remaining trees and shrubs that have not been installed and replace those that are demolished or dead; (the 2nd bulleted item) referring back to the item regarding Mondell Pines; (the 3'd bulleted item) requiring the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 13 of 28 applicant to do as the Landscape Administrator suggests and place all plantings on the west side of the channel; removing the 4th bulleted item (berm); (the 5`'` bulleted item) applicant should note at the time of final inspection for final Certificate of Occupancy all required plant materials will be required to be installed as was approved; (the 6h bulleted item) applicant should meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; regarding Item #7 (high school site landscaping) requiring the applicant to provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance and to comply with the Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summary Chart that is attached to the Landscape Comments; and regarding Item #8 (Natatorium Site Landscaping) requiring the applicant to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality trees in their place, noting that the undesirable trees consist of China Berry and Mulberry; 2) allowing no variance on Item#2 and keeping the height of the building at 35'; 3) regarding Item #3 (screening device) if the residential properties on the east and south sides already have fencing, the school district shall maintain those fences and if there is no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6' or 8' in height, whichever the resident wants; 4) deleting Item #4.a (articulation); 5) allowing no variance on Item #4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the building as far west as possible, a minimum of 20', and requiring the applicant to explain to City Council why they absolutely cannot move it any further west; 6) regarding Item #5 (lighting) requiring the lighting on the east and south sides of the Natatorium building to be nothing but sconces with the lights pointed to the ground, and allowing one sconce on either side of each door with a total of six on the east side and two on the south side; 7) allowing frosted glass on the windows on the east side of the Natatorium; 8) regarding the accessory buildings, requiring the buildings along the south property line to be moved as far north as possible and the buildings along the east property line to be moved as far west as possible; asking the applicant to completely reassess what they need regarding accessory buildings and come back with the absolute minimum (if four are not needed, then Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 14 of 28 do not put in four); approving 30' X 60' and moving each of them a minimum of 50'; requiring any lighting on the accessory buildings to be sconces with the lights pointed downward and to the interior of the site; 9) requiring applicant to include all uses on any future Site Plans; 10)approving the hammerhead turnaround shown on the exhibit and putting the emergency access gate 170' from the east residential properties; 11)asking applicant to consider moving the Natatorium to the parking area shown in Phase 5 and to explain to City Council why that is not a better site and why it would not work; 12)requiring compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. On June 6, 2000, the City Council approved the 151 reading (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, and subject to P&Z's recommendations with the following exceptions: 1) on Item #2, allow the building height as shown; 2) on Item #4.b, allow the 4:1 slope resulting from the relocation of the Natatorium 16' to the west 3) acknowledging the school district's commitment to make the following changes discussed this evening: Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the south (Park Place Addition): 1) Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 to 1, 4,000 square-feet in size, and located south of the multi-purpose building. This location will require additional tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated. 2) Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan; and b) additional low canopy trees to screen the shot put area along the fence. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 15 of 28 3) School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is currently no fence and will reconstruct the property owner's fence at the southwest corner to be level with his neighbor's fence on the east all the way to Peytonville Avenue (resulting in a fence height of 6' to 10'). 4) Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated trees along the east and south of the ball field area and a berm to be constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons being able to look over the fences into neighboring properties. All mitigated trees shall be on 4-inch caliper rather than 3-inch caliper. Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the East (Stone Lakes Addition): 1) Relocated the natatorium an additional 16' to the west and lowered the building eave 2', resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment (from 10' to 4'). 2) Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards. 3) Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block headlights from shining into eastern properties. 4) Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (31/2 to 4-feet tall) with a hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being accessible only to service and emergency vehicles. 5) Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded areas on the plan, existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the bufferyard. 6) School to maintain fencing along the east side as well, with the fence on the end being leveled. 7) Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be down-lighting only as provided by sconces mounted at height of 7'. Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2' Reading: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 16 of 28 1) Landscaping plan and tree mitigation plan for the site with a liberal interpretation of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ball field area and requiring replacement of trees that can reasonably be placed on this site only. 2) Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility. It should be noted that, because there is more than 20% opposition by the surrounding property owners, a super majority vote in the affirmative is required to approve the zoning change on this site. The City Council may wish to discuss the effects of this issue with regard to school districts with the City Attorney during Executive Session. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 7D. ZA 00-045, Site Plan for Costco Wholesale. This is the site plan for Costco, which was part of the recently approved Gateway Plaza Phase II Rezoning and Concept Plan. The Site Plan reflects an approximately 149,000-square-foot building with a gas station located in the southeast potion of the site. The gas station is an "unattended station" that permits purchase of gas with a Costco membership card. The Site Plan is in compliance with all conditions of the Zoning and Concept Plan approval. There appear to be no unresolved issues with this request. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, and subject to the City Council motion for the Concept Plan. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 17 of 28 Agenda Item No. 7E. Resolution No. 00-66, ZA 00-063, Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption, Tom Thumb. The request is for sale of packaged beer at the Tom Thumb grocery store located at the northwest corner of West Southlake Boulevard and North White Chapel. Tom Thumb is planned to open July 12, 2000. There are no apparent issues regarding this request. The proposed site meets the required distances from schools and churches. An exhibit showing these measurements is included in your packet. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0). If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Bruce Payne. Agenda Item No. 7F. Ordinance No. 781, 2nd Reading, amending Ordinances 717 and 717-B and Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code; designating the speed limit within Cambridge Place Addition as 25 mph. Public Safety and Public Works staffs have been working with the Cambridge Place Homeowners Association to investigate and reduce the speeding problem in the Cambridge Place Addition. DPS has placed the "Smart Trailer" and conducted additional enforcement to attempt to educate the offending drivers. The City Engineer has received a petition from the Homeowners Association requesting the City Council to consider reducing the speed limit in Cambridge Place Addition to 25 mph. This ordinance reduces the speed limit to 25 mph in the Cambridge Place Addition as was done previously in Timber Lake Addition, Southridge Lakes Subdivision, Coventry Manor Addition, Cross Timber Hills Addition and Oaktree Estates. This Ordinance was approved on first reading on June 6, 2000. If you have any questions, please contact Charlie Thomas. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 18 of 28 Agenda Item No. 7G. Ordinance No. 782, 2nd Reading, authorizing and allowing a buy back option for specific employees with TMRS. This ordinance would allow employees with at least 24 months of service with the City of Southlake to "buy back" service credits that they have previously forfeited with TMRS. If an employee has previously worked for a TMRS entity, and upon leaving that entity withdrew his or her member contributions from TMRS, this ordinance will allow eligible employees to "buy back" those funds. The last buy-back ordinance was pass in September 1993. Since that time, several other City employees have become eligible to buy back previous forfeited service if another ordinance is passed. For the remainder of FY99-00 and for all of FY00-01 there will be no financial impact, even if an eligible employee buys back forfeited service credit next month. If an eligible employee takes advantage of the buy back option, the earliest the City's contribution rate would be affected would be FY01-02. TMRS has determined that the maximum the City's contribution rate would be adjusted if all eligible employees took advantage of the buy back is .37%. However, TMRS only adjusts our contribution rate if an employee buys back forfeited service credit, and even then it would be a pro- rated percent of .37%. During the last buy back in 1993 a total of 15 employees were eligible, and only 3 have bought back forfeited service credits. Contact Lauren Safranek with questions. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-343, ZA 00-047, Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition. This site is located off the northeast corner of West Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The plan proposes a one-story, 21,573-square-foot City of Southlake Public Safety Facility and a future training facility. The facility will house fire and police services. The proposed zoning is for "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District and is limited to Public Safety Facility uses only. Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson has worked closely with SPIN and Myers Meadow residents in preparing the plans for the facility. There are no remaining resident issues. The Crime Control and Prevention District Board has also been involved with the plan and has approved the proposal. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 19 of 28 The only variances being requested are related to driveway spacing on Southlake Boulevard and Randol Mill Avenue. The spacing issues are primarily due to existing driveways on the adjacent sites. The proposed driveways comply with stacking depths and spacing requirements from the intersections. You may also note that the north driveway intersecting Randol Mill Avenue is limited to DPS personnel only and would not be publicly accessed. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to the review, allowing driveway spacings as proposed. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Garland Wilson, Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8B. Ordinance No. 480-344, 1" Reading, ZA 00-48, Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition. This plan proposes "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District zoning and Concept Plan for an out parcel of the DPS West Facility. The plan represents a general layout limited to the maximum 70% impervious coverage permitted under the "C-2" District Regulations. The intent behind this request is to recoup some of the cost of the DPS West Facility land purchase. There are no apparent resident issues related to this request, there are no variances requested and there are no remaining comments to address in the Plan Review. You may note that driveway access to this property is dependent upon the public access driveways located on the DPS West Facility plan. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-1) subject to the Review. Commissioner Muller dissented stating that she would prefer this site to be reserved as open space. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 20 of 28 If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Garland Wilson, Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA 00-049, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition. This is the plat associated with the two previous items on your agenda. It revises three existing platted lots and an unplatted parcel into two lots, one being the proposed Public Safety Facility and the other being the proposed commercial lot. There are no issues associated with this request. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to the review. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Garland Wilson, Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8D. Ordinance No. 480-345, 1S` Reading, ZA 00-064, Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park. The proposed zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District to include limited outside storage. The primary purpose behind this request is to address outside vending machines related to the Coca- Cola vending contract, and new lighting for baseball fields. The lighting for the fields exceeds the maximum intensity and glare permitted under the Lighting Ordinance. A review from the Building Department is include in your packet. The vending machines are proposed to be outside rather than within a building. An exhibit showing the proposed locations and a screening exhibit are included in your packet. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 21 of 28 A secondary reason for the request is to change zoning on recently acquired properties and address existing uses and facilities on the site. With the exception of the proposed new lighting and the vending machines, all other uses and structures are existing. There were no issues raised by residents during the Commission's hearing on this issue. - On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, modified as follows: 1) Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; 2) Delete Item #3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping) for existing improvements only; 3) Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards) for existing improvements only. The Commission felt the vending machines should comply with the outside storage regulations and did not allow the requested variance. Commissioner King dissented feeling that the vending machines should be allowed as proposed. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Kevin Hugman, Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8E. ZA 00-055, Plat Revision of Proposed Lots 1R1 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition. The property is located on Lonesome Dove Avenue north of Dove Road and is the location of the Lonesome Dove Baptist Church and Cemetery. The purpose of this plat is to provide separate lots for the cemetery and church site for financing. There are no issues related to this request. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to the review. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 22 of 28 If the Council or other interested parties have no concerns, this item could be moved to consent. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 99-112, Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza. This property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard, south of Gateway Plaza Phase II and west of Crooked Lane. The purpose behind this plat is to establish alignment of the Nolen Drive extension so that a final plat may be processed to dedicate the right-of-way. Because the dedication of the right-of-way subdivides several tracts, a Preliminary Plat was required that includes all the affected tracts. The lots shown represent the existing ownership lines as they exist today. The alignment for Nolen Drive has been coordinated with the alignment established by Gateway Plaza Phase II. You may note that with the exception of Lot 4, Block 2 (zoned SF-1A) all other lots currently have "AG" Agricultural District zoning. Rather than prematurely rezoning the properties, the applicant has requested a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance requirement the "the boundary of a plat must be appropriately zoned." With the exception of filing a Final Plat for Nolen Drive right-of- way or Lot 4, Block 2, a change of zoning will be required prior to final platting of any other lots. This section of Nolen Drive was recently added as a 70'A4U arterial street on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. On June 8, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000, deleting Items #1 (proper zoning requirement) and #3.a (allowing flexibility in placement perimeter utility easement). If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bruce Payne or Dennis Killough. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 23 of 28 Agenda Item No. 8G. Ordinance No. 646-B 1s` Reading, amending ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and length of terms. As requested by City Council, this ordinance will reduce the number of members on the Parks and Recreation Board from nine to seven, and change the length of term from three years to two. As you may recall, when board member Robin Jones resigned last year, her place was not filled. We also have received a resignation from board member Bill Kemp this week, and two terms expire this year. Council may wish to consider naming one appointment for a one- year term, and one member for a two-year term. With the current term expirations in 2001 and 2002, this would result in three appointments in 2001, and the remaining four board member appointments being named in 2002. If you have any questions on this item, contact either Sandy LeGrand or Kevin Hugman. Agenda Item No. 8H. Ordinance No. 787, ls` Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. The City was required to relocate water and sewer lines for the reconstruction of SH 114. The water and sewer lines along the south side of SH 114 were relocated within a utility easement across several properties. Most of the properties make up Gateway Plaza, Phase 2. The easements were distributed by the developer of Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 to the property owners. Apparently, a property owner of one of the tracts in Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 inadvertently signed an easement document for a piece of property which they did not own. The easement document was recorded with Tarrant County. Although the easement is null and invalid because the rightful owner did not execute the document, the easement must be abandoned to clear the title to the property. The rightful owner is in the process of executing the correct document for the easement. If you have any questions, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 00-47, Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tern. Section 2.07 of the Southlake City Charter provides for annual appointments of a Mayor Pro Tern and a Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: "...the Mayor shall, with the approval of the Council, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 24 of 28 appoint one of the members as Mayor Pro Tern and one as Deputy Mayor Pro Tem who shall hold their offices for one year." Contact Mayor Stacy or Sandra LeGrand with questions on this item. Agenda Item Nos. 9B through 9L. These items concern appointments to various boards and commissions. The memos from Sandra LeGrand describe the need for these appointments. Contact Sandy with any questions on these items. Agenda Item No. 10A. Approval of Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc. for the construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court. This change order is required to complete the paving improvements to Love Henry Court. During construction of the roadway, the contractor could not properly compact the subgrade of the road due to the presence of subsurface groundwater. In order to relieve the effects of the subsurface groundwater to the subgrade of the roadway, a subdrain was constructed along Love Henry to collect the subsurface groundwater and divert the groundwater to the storm drain system. The subdrain will not only allow the subgrade to dry out enough to properly compact the subgrade, it will prevent the groundwater from penetrating the subgrade in the future and thus avoid eminent pavement damage. Change Order No. 3 is for construction of the subdrain. In order to avoid delaying completion of the project as well as incurring remobilization costs, staff authorized the construction of the subdrain prior to Council approval of the change order. There is no alternative to relieve the subsurface groundwater other than constructing the subdrain. The change order is in the amount of $11,460. The project is already over budget, therefore the costs associated with this change order will have to be funded using available money from projects constructed under budget. The CIP budget appropriated $359,000 for this project. With this change order, the total cost of the project totals $418,992.56. The project will be complete by the end of July. If you have any questions regarding this item, please call Shawn Poe. Agenda Item No. 10B. Award of bid for lighting for Bicentennial Park ballfields #4, #5, and #10 to NEMA 3 Electric. This item is related to agenda item number 8D, rezoning and site plan approval Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 25 of 28 for Bicentennial Park. As we discussed in a previous memo, SPDC had approved funding for lighting of ballfields #4, #5 and #10 at Bicentennial Park in the FY2000 SPDC Capital Improvements Plan budget. These fields are the coach pitch and t-ball fields. The lights will be controlled by the same automatic timers that control the other ballfield lights. Since this age group is the largest, Southlake Baseball Association (SBA) requested lighting to be able to extend its playing time and accommodate the large number of teams. The lights however, do not comply with the recently amended Lighting Ordinance. In order to construct the lights in time for the fall season (if approved), and due to the next City Council meeting being July 18, we are bringing this item forward at the same time as the zoning/site plan request. (Baseball practice begins Aug. 19, with the season beginning Sept. 9.) We would not ordinarily bring forward both items on the same agenda if it were not for the timing issues. However, if Council denies the variance for the ballfield lighting, you also can reject the bid as well. The bid amount was well within budget, probably due to the fact that electrical panels installed for Fields #1 and #3 were oversized at the time, reducing the cost associated with additional panels for these fields. Staff also recommends that Alternate #1 be included, which will allow installation of an electrical pedestal between fields #4 and #10 to serve the concession trailer. Acceptance of the base bid and alternate #1 will result in a total cost of$99,291. NEMA 3 was the electrical contractor for Bicentennial Park phase II expansion and staff has had good experience with the company. Contact Kevin Hugman if you have any further questions. Agenda Item No. 11A. Ordinance No. 783, 1S` Reading, Providing for the amendment of Article II of Chapter 8 for the Code of Ordinance relating to Municipal Court of Record. (This item was previously provided to you in the off-packet week as a consent item.) During the 76th Texas Legislative Session, House Bill 731 was passed amending Chapter 30 of the Government Code, which standardized all Municipal Courts of Record within the State of Texas. By law the City of Southlake is required to codify this statute and incorporate all of its uniform policies and procedures by amending Article II of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances. The City Council has the discretion Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 26 of 28 to set the term of the judge(s) to either a two-year or four-year term. The current format of the ordinance provides for a four-year term. Refer to the memo prepared by Sean Leonard for additional highlights of the ordinance. Contact Sean Leonard with questions on this issue. Other Items of Interest Priority Rankings. Please review the materials attached to my memo. All of the new project advocacy forms submitted have been incorporated into the list for ranking, as well as forms for previously submitted projects that have not yet been completed. The memo from Greg Last describes Step Two of the process in detail. Note that this year, staff members have also indicated their recommendations of the relative importance of each project. Please call Greg Last or Shana Yelverton if you have any questions about the process. ' June Retreat. Planning continues for the June Retreat. Please contact Shana Yelverton to discuss current plans, your ideas for the Retreat and other details. The Retreat is set for Monday, June 26 (Council Chamber) and Tuesday, June 27 (Solana Education Center). You will be receiving your Retreat packet next week. Note that there will not be an SPDC meeting in June. Teen Center Survey. As you may know, a committee of adults and teens has been working with staff and the survey consultant to develop two survey instruments for the teen center survey. Both surveys will be administered via random telephone dialing to Southlake residents, one being a survey of adults, the other being a survey of teens in grades 7-12. This survey will be a scientific-based, random survey. The teen survey questionnaire is very similar to the adult survey, but does not include questions related to funding or timing of construction of a recreation center or teen center. The ad-hoc committee, which includes Councilmembers Ronnie Kendall and Patsy DuPre, is satisfied with this draft, and it incorporates your previous comments as well. However, before we Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 27 of 28 release the survey to the consultant to administer, we wanted to allow the Council a final opportunity to look at it and provide any additional input. We have included a copy of each survey in your packet for your review and comment. The specifics of the questionnaire should not be released to the public prior to administering the survey since that can bias the results. As such, please review the draft survey and contact Kevin Hugman with comments or questions by Tuesday, June 20. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please contact Councilmembers Kendall or DuPre, or Kevin Hugman. Election 2001 and Arts in the Square. City Secretary Sandra LeGrand and Election Judge Karen Cienki have concerns with Arts in the Square planning next year's event on the day we have designated as the last Saturday prior to election for early voting (see the attached letter from Karen). Karen and Sandy stated this is the most convenient Saturday for early voters and I agree. Since City Hall will be brand new, they have real concerns about parking and with the public wanting to visit • and walk around the new facility. It might be in the best interest of our voting citizens to make it a policy that other events will not be held at the Town Square parks or Town Hall in conjunction with our election voting days. We can reconsider such requests after next year once we have had the opportunity to evaluate the effect it will have on the convenience of our voters. Let me know if you have any different thoughts on this matter. Mr. Jerry Boyle. Concerning Mr. Boyle's letter to you dated June 14, 2000, Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson is working on a response to Mr. Boyle's complaint. The building division has not yet accepted or rejected any written permit for Mr. Boyle. I will pass on Malcolm's response to Mr. Boyle as soon as it is available. In the meantime, contact Malcolm with any questions. Also included with my memo: ❖ AMS ' ❖ Calendar of Meetings / Events ••• Kudos Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting 6/20/2000 Page 28 of 28 ❖ Town Square happenings ❖ Park & Recreation Events BC Staff Extension Numbers: Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 ' Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, ext. 767 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 I 803 Shadow Glen Drive Southlake, Texas 76092-7237 September 17, 1999 • Mayor Rick Stacy and City Council Members City of Southlake 1725 East Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor Stacy and City Council Members: The Southlake Women's Club and Brian Stebbins/Town Square have been working on providing the city with an Arts Festival on the Square, scheduled for April 28, 29, and 30, 2000. To date, no application for a Special Use Permit has been submitted as discussed with Karen Gandy. Sandy LeGrand and I have discussed this and we do have some concerns that we would like to bring to your attention. We do not have a problem with the Art Festival dates for next year, but once the new Town Hall is open, we would like the Council to consider not allowing any Special Use Permits issued for the following voting dates: 2nd Saturday in January Early Voting 3rd Saturday in January Election Day Last Saturday in April Early Voting 1st Saturday in May Election Day 1g Saturday in August Early Voting 2nd Saturday in August Election Day Last Saturday in October OR 1' Saturday in November Early Voting 1 g Tuesday AFTER the 1st Monday in November Election Day Even though the City rarely has elections four times in a year,these dates should be set aside. Since Tarrant County will be leasing space in the Town Hall, would they expect to hold County, State and Federal elections in Town Hall? Voters need to have reasonable access to the polling places and closing down streets would restrict access and create problems for • some of our voters. The first time we use the Town Hall will be a challenge anyway since we will have to deal with the public and access to the library as well as the initial set-up. Since events of this magnitude require a great deal of hours and some advancement of fees, it would prove a hardship to volunteer organizations if the special use permit were not applied for until a couple of months before the anticipated event and was denied. Perhaps a letter could be sent to Mr. Stebbins restricting certain dates from special events. If you have any questions, please call me at 488-8204. Sincerely, .61/4...., dk.i.jit) Karen A. Cienki Election Judge, City of Southlake cc: Billy Campbell Sandy LeGrand Karen Gandy Brain Stebbins Southlake Women's Club AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/16/00 2:52 PM Council Meeting—July 18, 2000 Council Meeting—August 1, 2000 t Reports/Forum: Reports/Forum: Consent: Consent: ' Minutes of June 6 1. Minutes Amending the Personnel Policy Manual to inc Worker's Comp Wage- LS 3. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a prof servs agr w/JD Wilson and Assoc for development of a strategic plan-SKY 4. Authorize IA w/CISD for natatorium-KH 5. Award of Bid to for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements along N.Carroll-SP 6. Award of bid to_for the abandonment of the lift station at Dove Creek -SP 7. Approval of a prof sery agr for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improv to serve the Oak Hill Addn as part of a CDBG-SP 2"Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2"Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: I. **ZA 00-016,Z,for property So.of Walgreens"C-2"to"0-1" 1. ZA 99-139,RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 2. **ZA 00-047,RZ,SP,L-3,B-1 Corner Addn 2. **ZA 00-037,RZ,Tracts 4G1 &4H,Johnson Road 3. **ZA 00-048 RZ,SP,L-2R,B-1,Corner Addn 3. Ord.#783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord.Relating to 4. **ZA 00-064,RZ,SP,Bicentennial Park Municipal Court of Record-SL 5. **ZA 00-060,SP,portion of L-4,B-1 Sabre Group 6. Ord.No.786 revising the City Code,Parks and Rec Bd number of board members and length of term 7. Ord.No.787,Abandonment of permanent utility easement SH114-SP **Pending P&Z Action ending P&Z Action 1" Reading&Related Items: 1" Reading&Related Items: 1. ZA 99-139,RZ/SP 114 Kimball Sq. 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord. No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG 2. **ZA 00-037,RZ,Tracts 4G1 &4H,Johnson Rd 2. **ZA 00-024,RZ,2929 N.White Ch.,SF-1A,24.414 ac(P&Z tabled 3. **ZA 00-038,PS,L-9&10,Johnson Road(maybe at retreat) to July 20) 4. Ord.#783,Amending Art II,Ch 8 of the Code of Ord. Relating to 3. **ZA 00-036,PP Simmons Addn Municipal Court of Record-SL 5. **ZA 00-040,ZSP,Georgetown Park(maybe at retreat) **Pending P&Z Action **Pending P&Z Action Resolutions: Resolutions: 1. Res.#_,adopting amendments to the Tax Abatement Agr w/Sabre-GL Consider: Consider: 1. Bob Jones Park conceptual plan-KH 2. Registration/fee policy for Parks&Rec programs-KH 3. Commercial developers agr for CISD No.6 Addition-CT 4. CARS agreement-KH 11 iscuss: Discuss: Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord.No.480-KK Noise Regs- KPG(PZ tabled to June 8,CC disc item when?) Executive Session: Executive Session: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE - Draft Date: 6/16/00 2:52 PM City Council Meeting- August 15, 2000 City Council Meeting- September 5, 2000 � Forum: Forum: Consent: Consent: . Minutes 2nd Reading I Pub Hearing&Related Items: 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1. Ord.#778,Noise Ordinance-MJ/Ord. No.480-KK Noise Regs-KPG **ZA 00-024,RZ,2929 N.White Ch.,SF-IA,24.414 ac(P&Z tabled to July 20 **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action 1st Reading&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: • **Pending P&Z action **Pending P&Z action Resolutions: Resolutions: Consider: Consider: Discuss: Discussion: •ecutive Session: AGENDA MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE- Draft Date: 6/16/00 2:52 PM Future City Council Meeting Forum: nsent: 1. Fort Worth Water Contract-RH 2. Award bid on handrails Town Hall-RH 3. Auth Mayor to execute letter authorizing TxDOT to change speed limits in construction zone on SH 114-SP 4. Award of Bid to for the purchase of furniture for Town Hall"to the AMS under consider items for September 5,2000? 5. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Fina(S-7)-SP 6. Abndmnt of 15'utility easement on property owned by Explorer(S-7)-SP 7. Permission to advertise for bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Davis Blvd.and Continental-SP 2nd Reading/Pub Hearing&Related Items: 1st Reading&Related Items: 1. Ord.#760,ROW Use Management Ordinance-RH/SKY 2. Ord.483-I,Amendments to Sub Ord No.483,-Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements-CC/KH 3. Ord.No.774,Amendment to Trail System Master Plan-CC/KH I ' Resolutions: 1. Res.99-16,relating to limiting#of zoning applications-from 3/23 CC mtg Consider: 1. Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 2. Prof Services Agreement-Michael Drive(PW-5/4/99) 3. Interlocal Agreement with Grapevine re: North Kimball-RH 4. Auth Mayor to enter into an IA w/NE Tarrant County Regional Water System(NETCRWS)-RH Discuss: 1. Land Conservatory District 2. Utility Policies&Standards Ordinance 3. Street Standard Ordinance 4. 5/16/2000-Ord.759,False alarm Ordinance-GW/DuPre 5. Ord.#_,Sign Ordinance-MJ 6. Ord.762,Adoption of Uniform Fire Code-RB 7. Ord.770,High Grass/Weeds-MJ 8. Ord.771,Nuisance Ordinance-MJ 9. Ord._,Abatement of Hazardous Buildings-MJ 10. **Amendment to Master Thoroughfare Plan-CC 11. kxecutive Session: T u n e 19 - 3u�2000 July zo S M T W ____WT F 5 'i__5- �� 1 2 3 26 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ne 25 2I 11 12 13 1415 16 17 23 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 25 18 19 20 211 22 23 24 29 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 3° 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 30 31 Monda ,June 19 Thursda ,June 22 Sand LeGrand -VAC Sandy LeGrand -VAC 6:00pm 6:30pm Rex Potter/Mayor Stacy meeting w/Ted Gillum&Jerry Lawrence 6:00pm 6:30pm JUC Meeting @ CISD Annex 6:30pm 7:00pm Planning&Zoning Commission(City Hall) Tuesday,June 20 Frida June 23 7:00pm City Coundl Meeting(City Hall) - Sandy LeGrand-VAC Retreat Packets scheduled to be delivered Wednesda June 21 Saturday,June 24 Sandy LeGrand-VAC BC/SKY interviewinI for Assistant to the CM i1 Sunday,June 25 Meetings Events 2 6/16/00 J u n L 2 6 June 2000 T W T F July 2000 S 1 2 3 26 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 'y 2 it 12 13 14 16 17 28 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2 25 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 266 125 26 27 28 29 29 30 3° 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 30 31 Monday,June 261 Thursday,June 29 Ci Council Retreat-Evening @ TBD 4:30pm 5:30pm TMB-Steering Committee Ststus Meeting- Senior Center 7:30am 8:00am Chamber Breakfast(instead of Luncheon) 7:00pm 8:00pm SPIN 8 Mtg Re: Site Plan for Consultants in Radiology(Senior Activity Center) 4:00pm 4:30pm City Council hearing on Kirby's Steakhouse @ City Hall Tuesda June 27 Frida ,June 30 Ci Council Retreat-all da ,@ TBD City Manager files FY00-01 with City Secretary 7:00pm 8:00pm Library Foundation meeting (Senior Activity Center) 7:00pm 7:30pm SPIN 12 meeting re: Cross Timber Hills Sewer @ City Hall Wednesday,June 28__ Saturday,July 1 7:00pm 8:00pm Library Board meeting(City Hall) Sunday,July 2 Meetings Events 3 6/16/00 F- Le . (y. cky 24ak-- Meeting t se r lf- assessment .,, ,,,,, f 1.6'.?”'"',14 ''s`I ACC Cnaiienge II • ,`'`°°7, :* 1;0 ' a���. opt" a ,, By Ricky Black, Fire Chief '"ter..tto.,. Southlake Department of Public Safety Otis s ' • i io, 2),.., ,..Z , ,., ,,„,.., \ \•Of 1 .; =L V‘i`'''1.' ''':: 'zi i: 1,1: 1 ( 71 ' any of us in fire ser- I' ;y / '�' vices spend a lot of j "" ""�`� '" ` MB time assessing emer- gency fire scenes, deciding what we Those are some tough questions, organization among department mem- did well and what could have been especially when you take them to heart hers, community leaders, and citizens. done better. We study the scene from and attempt to provide a non-defen- When you have completed the self- all directions and perspectives with no sive, no-nonsense, straight answer. assessment process, you have the detail too small to overlook. Depend- There is a model in place today that option of applying for international ing on local SOPs, this process might assists fire chiefs in preparing their accreditation,including being assessed be called a fire critique or post-inci- agencies for just that type of self-eval- by peers from around the world.Then dent analysis. In my opinion, many of uation or assessment.It is a tool devel- your department can be considered for us do a good job of measuring our per- oped by the Commission on Fire this prestigious honor. formance when it comes to emergency Accreditation International(CFAI). In Southlake, we committed to the scenes. But how many of us have By taking this model and applying process several years ago. I have to applied that same approach and it to your paid and/or volunteer fire admit that becoming an accredited thought process to the fire agency as a department or emergency service, you agency was a very exciting proposition whole? can discover specific areas where you simply because of what that means to When the post-incident analysis is do very well and identify areas of us as a professional society. When we complete, we can usually answer the strength or weakness within the received our award of accreditation, question, "Were the strategies, tactics, department. It also will assist fire the recognition and approval were and overall actions effective on this chiefs with a method for addressing very rewarding to us. But more fulfill- incident?" But can we as readily deficiencies and building on organiza- ing was completing the process and all answer a similar question, "Is our tional success. that it taught. We thought we did a agency effective as an organization?" As described in the CFAI manual, good job at what we said we did as a Even if you believe the answer to be the process provides a mechanism for fire department. I yes,can you prove it?And how do you developing concurrent documents, This process verified that we were measure the effectiveness of your including strategic and program action right in a lot of areas, but also very agency? plans, while fostering pride in your wrong in others. It challenged us to /� TEXAS FIRE CHIEF Spring/Summer 2000 23 D ...- / develop processes and systems to cor- • Financial Resources a particular task as specified in the rect identified deficiencies. In other • Programs accreditation process. The model also words, the accreditation process • Physical Resources has a comprehensive research and piped us improve the quality and per- • Human Resources information collection guide, broken rmance of our organization by ask- • Training and Competency down by category,that includes check- ing critical questions and determining • Essential Resources lists, exhibits, benchmarks, references if the programs and services we • External Systems Relationships and activities. offered were effective in meeting the Criterion statements in the CFAI This was an incredible process for needs of our community. accreditation model define major areas Southlake, as it will be for you — a The Accreditation Model evaluates within each category that measure or process that is not possible without ten categories within your department: index departmental performance. hard work and an uncompromising • Governance and Administration Within each criterion, there are perfor- commitment to improve your level of • Assessment and Planning mance indicators that define the service to both internal and external • Goals and Objectives desired level of ability to demonstrate customers. As the fire chief, it pro- vides me with an excellent manage- ment} tool for an ever-changing envi- ronment and establishes a template for ma setting goals and objectives, short- and M i long-range planning, budgeting, and other areas of responsibility.As a fire- 41. tvkli ,. ,,.,, : . fighter, it expands my sense of confi- dence and pride towards in depart- SPECIALIZING IN 12 VOLT CHARGING SYSTEMS ment. For Southlake citizens, it When Lives Are On the Line... demonstrates that our fire ante- is built on a strong performance-based • system that is recognized internation- i- i.; Don't wait for a DEATH to occur to replace the most ally with the fire service. t.. important component on your ambulance or fire I congratulate those Texas fire ' r <, truck...the ALTERNATOR. departments currently involved with F;+a the accreditation process: '"`>` Until now, there has not been an alternator that could • Austin Fire Department keep up with the high amp demand of EMS vehicles • + `` u or police cars. • Round Rock Fire Department ., • Plano Fire Department Has changing alternators and batteries become your Baytown Fire and Rescue A. way of life?It doesn't have to be. • Corpus Christi Fire Department /'" ' • Frisco Fire Department /Abr.jie MPI-VITAL Alternators have been "at the scene" for • Houston Fire Department r /`' V six years now with 205 to 270 amp alternators for • Missouri City Fire and Rescue F, ambulances, and 270 and 300 amp alternators for Services fire trucks. These direct replacement alternators feature: • Richardson Fire Department • precision balanced rotors • hand wound stators You will realize that this is not a • patented heat sinks •external regulators • 24 diodes • over 14 volts at idle document that your team will prepare and store on a shelf to collect dust. Don't buy an inferior product. VITAL alternators can This manual becomes the documented handle the load with all of the equipment on. cornerstone of just how your depart- , ment will operate. I encourage every ' '-: 1, ,/ Remember, low battery voltage can cause starter fail- fire chief to examine this self-assess- ure, transmission failure, early failure of electrical ment model. I have no doubt that you components and LOSS OF LIVES. will find it challenging, exhausting, , revealing and rewarding. A high amp alternator is VITAL! If you would like more information or have questions related to the CFAI MPI VITAL accreditation model,please contact me at rblack@cityofsouthlake.com or 803 Gemini,Duncanville,TX 75137•(800)886-8224•(972)780-0072•FAX(972)780-0160 contact the CFAI directly at web-site:http://www.mpi-vital.com cfai@cfainet.org. D 24 TEXAS FIRE CHIEF Spring/Summer 2000 7202 Dick Fisher Drive North North Richland Hills,Texas 76180 June 7,2000 Mayor,City Manager,or Director of Personnel City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to take the opportunity to express thanks on behalf of my Department for the assistance given us by one of your employees. Earlier today we were dispatched to a reported major accident in the 6400 block of Glenview Drive. Upon our arrival,we found two vehicles involved with one obvious patient. Off-duty Southlake Firefighter Shan Allsbrooks was on the scene,holding traction on the patient's C-spine. He identified himself as a Firefighter and effectively reported the patient's chief complaint and medical history. Although her injuries were not life threatening,he was instrumental in calming the patient in an otherwise traumatic situation. I am convinced that his contributions added to the "Customer Service" afforded our patient. I applaud his willingness to help and the demonstration of his people skills beyond the realm of his employment. Please extend to him our thanks. Respectfully, David Burke Fire Lieutenant North Richland Hills Fire Department I • .-..",(9.:2 , --.„ Liii Y - . i I 1 1..-7 .. 7*S°71?.744.74,`' e7""Ir 4(.., . • /.1"4 4 ?r • �ti g ib�<!' v 4 4; .4 ..4.07 t • 9 r -�-�r�J -1-2-0 , j?s4- _z_.. - . --', 7 - d.•....,..A(,7 d..,„,2 ,,,.,z7 -.,..- -03 7-146 Pliliz.- , �? - � 7� "?'-'77( e-62 -Y7/'2--e2 ,r1 7 . • • , • • . rR5 ouvo2 - J i 1 i • _� h 1 OOOZ Z l NM +j . 1 NEWS CLIPPING Source: SOUTHLAKE JOURNAL Date: FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2000 II . ._ .._...... „..„... .. . __.:.,,..,,_. . , ..__:._.-__:__________„ --._ .•,,.... ,... . 4,,, a. 1...1,, , ..,,-,•,,, � b a' _ ■ r _ So U L A x r '�¢ r '?.ie. . a auk{v..'P .r'a 4, ,�. `: `� ••4 i* W aSJU „,; i - gO l'A . J i • -t"Rrt•..__A ` . ••��•✓'l Y _ y w Back By Popular Demand-Peatnred Artist ofthe Month Plastic I'igS Ad Linda McCartney y :. • . • Saturday, June• 17th 3. `y ,. � ;, 7:00pm • Spr!ng Concert Series 4r7� • ,,r,z w ids fi zo t•r 1 -.s.a'1,i� a�.> ,+ , , i y la#' { TA #19 f `e, ,sec `4k c 7I t�F -� ,-°xy. A�'j�7Y ` 'ris Fri day, Jane 23rd•• 7.00 pin z f,', '�T�>� SS & Lake Cities Concert Band,• •,,' %-, r•' l . ' S day June 10 h+ 7.00 pm Saturday, June 24th• 7:00 pm+- , ; Old S of = -- • :, 4. .. Tocar • ... F + June 16th• 7:00 pm Friday, June 30th-7i00 pm : . • R Lake Cities Swing Band The Outtakes 1 Saturday line 17th• 7:00pm ~ •+ W... _,a .'fir"'��Y .i .Y f •- i'.-...•.--, ..•- 4 ati.} �1�1�, '1. ' v Y r- i i:- Mark Your Calendars • Town Square's Traditions Continue... starsAllffStrIpes Independence Day Celebration Monday, July 3 • 7:00 p.m. Join us for a Children's Parade, Children's Entertainment in the Park • and Free Kid's Train Rides. End the evening with a performance by the Lakes Cities Band and at dusk a spectacular Fireworks Show u,,„ _ SO 4 Kf t TOWN SQUARE L .11 o ; oUthiok - __ For more information call 817-329-5c66 or visit om-iMLbsitEat'41ww'w'.southlaketo nsquare.com - Kim Bush From: Teddi Zonker Friday, June 16, 2000 11:46 AM All Users "Stories under the Stars" Sat. , July 8, 2000 7:30pm - 9:30pm Southlake Town Square Pavilion —FREE—TO THE PUBLIC STORIES FOR ALL ages Bring the entire family out for a classic night of storytelling under the stars in Southlake Town Square's RUSTIN PARK Featuring Storytellers Helen Garrison and Bruce Ayers Family Program of Professional Storytelling presented by Southlake Parks and Recreation, Tarrant Area Guild Of Storytellers and partially funded by the Northeast Tarrant Arts Council se feel free to bring lawn chairs, blankets and picnic baskets - (please, no glass OR alcohol) If you should have any questions, please contact the Parks and Recreation Division at 817/481.5581, ext. 756 or Gary Whitaker at 1.800.518.7715. ### 1 1 Kim Bush From: Teddi Zonker Alt: Friday, June 16, 2000 11:35 AM All Users ject: Stars and Stripes, Monday, July 3, 2000 starsBW jpgjpg starsPMS jpg.jpg Stars and Stripes Southlake Independence bay Celebration Presented by the City of Southlake and Southlake Town Square Monday, July 3 7pm - 10pm Town Square This old-fashioned family event will begin at 7pm —' Feel free to bring blankets, lawn chairs,and picnics — illIdren's parade will begin at 7:30pm which will be led by Boocoos the Clown on a unicycle! sure to dress up your bicycles/wagons and come show your patriotic pride throughout Town Square! Excellent prizes for most patriotic, most creative, and cutest. Please call if you will be participating in the parade: 817/481.5581, ext. 758 — —Activities begin at 7pm Professional Face Painters Train rides for all ages Trick Roping Cowboy — Juggler — Strolling Clowns 8:30pm - Lake Cities Community Band 9:30pm - FIREWORKS SHOW Southlake Town Square - corner of Southlake Boulevard and North Carroll For more information, please contact Southlake Parks and Recreation at 817/481.5581, ext. 756. ### IP 1 re City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM t June 12, 2000 ' TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development SUBJECT: Annual Project Prioritization by City Council Step 2—PROJECT RANKING Action Requested: It is now time to rank the priority of projects in the master schedule. Background Information: The "Project Prioritization" process has been utilized as a management tool for several years to best match staff work with the priorities of Council. It allows City Council, board members and individual advocates of projects an opportunity to place their item before City Council for collective ranking. This process has provided clear direction to staff as to the Council's desires and has greatly aided in the productivity of staff due to our ability to focus on the higher priorities. Process: The attached master schedule lists every project that has been submitted for ranking by City Council and staff. (Note that there is an extra copy of the master schedule yellow paper for returning to staff) Please provide a "x" or check in the appropriate box in the "Priority" columns 1-5 on the left side of the chart with#1 being the higher priority. We are still working under the following schedule. Please return the Yellow Master Schedule with your rankings distributed as noted above to Greg by Tuesday,June 20, 2000. Please keep the PAF's for your reference. June 9 -Distribute draft Master List and PAF forms to Council for review June 13 - Council to return any recommended revisions to Greg June 16 - Staff gives final forms to Council for ranking June 20 -Rankings by council returned to Greg June 23 - Finalized rankings placed in June retreat packets June 27+28 -Discuss rankings at June retreat Financial Considerations: None Citizen Input/ Board Review: Citizens, board members and any interested parties are allowed to submit a Project Advocacy Form (PAF) for consideration by Council. Legal Review: None Alternatives: Staff would be gl ad ad to pursue alternative management tools if suggested. However, the current process has been used to match Council's desires with staff's efforts for several years. Supporting Documents: Attached you will find the following information. • Master Schedule/ Status Report of all projects. • Director recommendations memos. • Project Advocacy Forms for all projects on master schedule as noted. • Yellow copy of Master Schedule (Return this after ranking) Staff Recommendation: Continue to utilize the project prioritization management tool to ensure alignment of Council's desires with staffs efforts. We appreciate your cooperation in providing timely responses. Feel free to contact any department director or the staff contact shown on the PAF form to discuss an item or find out additional information. PLEASE RETURN THE RANKED MASTER SCHEDULE TO GREG LAST BY TUESDAY,JUNE 20. Greg Last Ph: (817)481-5581, ext. 750 Fax: (817) 251-9051 N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\Memos\2000-06-12 CC Billy.doc ,1_ .• y �, City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM 1 June 12, 2000 • TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development SUBJECT: Annual Project Prioritization by City Council RECOMMENDATIONS FROM DIRECTORS Following is a summary by department of the project priority recommendations of the Director's of each department. Feel free to contact them directly should you have any questions. Public Safety- Garland Wilson, x730 1. Election Signs Regulations 2. Update Noise Control Ordinance 3. Emergency Preparedness Notification program 4. Revise Landscape ordinance to include bufferyards 5. Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 6. Sign Ordinance Revisions 7. Ordinance Establishing regulations on Corp's property 8. Residential lighting standards review 9. Elevator Ordinance 10. Substandard Building Ordinance • 11. High Grass/Weeds Ordinance revisions 12. False alarm reduction program 13. Uniform Fire Code adoption 14. Health and Sanitation Ordinance 15. Mass Gathering Ordinance Planning- Bruce Payne, x767 1. City-Initiated rezonings per the 1998 LUP update 2. Hotel/Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance 3. Zoning Ordinance - Front Yard Issues 4. Zoning Ordinance - Reduce residential PUD minimum acreage 5. Zoning Ordinance -480-V, Miscellaneous clean-up items 6. Zoning,Ordinance - Special Events Permit& Procedures 7. Amortization of certain non-conforming uses 8. Zoning Ordinance - SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial Districts 9. Zoning Ordinance - 480-KK, revising noise standards 10. Zoning Ordinance - 480-LL, Revising outside storage/screening regulations 11. Growth Management Study 12. Thoroughfare Plan Amendment: Peytonville/ Shady Oaks connection 13. Alternative Entry Design Standards for Residential Developments 14. Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Lighting Standards 110 ♦ . ' Public Works- Ron Harper, x779 1. Sprm Water Utility District 41) 2. Utility Placement Ordinance 3. Underground Utilities 4. Drainage Master Plan 5. Street Standards Ordinance 6. Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 7. Drainage Ordinance Revisions 8. Flood Plain Ordinance 9. Street Light Standards 10. Septic Ordinance Community Services - Kevin Hultman, x 757 1. Trail System Master Plan Update 2. Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan Plan 3. Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 4. Youth Master Plan Development 5. Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development 6. Ord. 774, Amending Trail System Master plan to require 8' trail width 7. Ord. 483-I, amending park dedication requirements 8. Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project 9. City Manager's Office- Shana Yelverton, x705 S1. Citywide Strategic Plan 2. Southlake Historical Commission 3. Resident Satisfaction Survey 4. City of Southlake Annual Report 5. Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 6. Trash pick-up contract review 7. Rules of the City Council Economic Development- Greg Last, x750 1. Tax Abatement Policy Revisions 0 Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities • STEP 2 - PROJECT RANKING High—Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PW Drainage Ordinance Revisions 80% Yes Comment:Intend to begin after elections. CS Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 10% Yes Comment:In conjunction with TSMP update. CM Citywide Strategic Plan 50% Yes ED Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy 20% Yes Comment:Significant research collected.Priority has been the Kirkwood Road Closure issue. PL City-Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update 70% Yes Comment:Staff preparation complete,pending workgroup HOLD direction PL Hotel/Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance 25% Yes Comment:Staff completed first draft, waiting on establishing a workgroup. PW Underground utilities 70% Yes CM Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 50% Yes HOLD 111/ PW Utility Placement Ordinance 70% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard Issues(Workgroup) 10% Yes PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484 90% Yes CM Southlake Historical Commission 50% Yes PW Storm Water Utility District 80% Yes CS Youth Master Plan Development 0% Yes PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord.217) 75% Yes PS/PL Emergency Preparedness Notification Program 80% Yes PS/PL Revise Landscape Ordinance to include bufferyards etc. 0% Yes PW Street Light Standards 0% Yes CS/PL Trail System Master Plan Update 20% Yes PL Zoning Ord:Reduce Residential PUD Min.Acreage 50% Yes (land conservation revision) HOLD Comment:On hold per request of workgroup. PL Zoning Ordinance 480-V-Misc.Clean-up Items Phase I 80% Yes PW Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 70% Yes PW Septic Ordinance 25% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-Special Events Permit&Procedures 80% Yes Comment:Staff has completed first draft , CS Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan 75% Yes 1111 Comment:In conjunction with Parks Master Plan update and Bob Jones Development Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 1 of 4 Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities • STEP 2 - PROJECT RANKING High--Low Results % PAF 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PL Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses(on hold) 50% Yes Comment:ZBA orientation/procedures completed by staff, awaiting city attorney's review and council direction. PS Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 5% Yes PS Sign Ordinance Revisions 0% Yes CS Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project: 0% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial 5% Yes Districts Comment:Idea has not been supported by PZ or CC in past. CS Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan: 40% Yes CM Rules of the City Council 0% Yes CM Trash pick-up contract review 0% Yes PL Ord.480-KK,revising noise standards 80% Yes Comment:Staff preparation and City Attorney review complete, waiting on discussion at CC on 7-18-00, consideration by PZ on 7-20-00 PL Ord.480-LL,revising outside storage/screening regulations 0% Yes PL Growth management study 85% Comment:Final report pending in workgroup PL Thoroughfare Plan Amendment:Peytonville/Shady Oaks 25% Yes connection HOLD Comment: On hold at Council(work group to be formed of area residents) PS Ordinance Establishing Regulations on Corps' Property 0% Yes CS Ord. 774,Amending Trail system Master Plan to require all 60% No trails to be 8 feet in width PL Elimination of perimeter walls and fences around residential 0% Yes subdivisions in low density areas along arterial roadways. PS Residential lighting standards review 0% Yes PS Elevator Ordinance 0% Yes PS Substandard Bldg. Ordinance 0% Yes PS High Grass/Weeds Ordinance revision 0% Yes PS False Alarm Reduction Program 90% Yes PS 1997 Uniform Fire Code 90% Yes PL Unified Development Code 0% Yes PW Ord.483-I Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing 0% Yes park dedication requirements PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(704-B)Open House Signs 0% Yes • PS Mass Gathering Ordinance 0% Yes PW Health and Sanitation Ordinance 0% Yes PW Flood Plain Ordinance 0% Yes Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 2 of 4 , Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 2 -PROJECT RANKING High--Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score CM City of Southlake Annual Report 0% Yes CM Resident Satisfaction Survey 0% Yes PW Drainage Master Plan 0% Yes PL Conversion to a Unified Development Ordinance 0% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance Revisions:Lighting Standards 0% Yes PL Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Regulations 0% Yes N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRJORITY\Reports\2000-06-12.doc Department Legend: PW=Public Works, PL=Planning,CS=Community Services,CM=City Manager, SEC=City Secretary,FI=Finance,PS=Public Safety,HR=Human Resources,ED=Economic Development Note: If you would like to request a Project Advocacy Form(PAF), please contact Greg at 481-5581, x750 or E-mail: glast@ci.southlake.tx.us • S Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 3 of 4 • • l Following are Completed Projects from Previous Priority Schedules Dept CC Rank Item Date Approved by Council PL N/A Thoroughfare Plan Amendment:Nolen Drive, SH 114 to June 6,2000 Crooked Lane PL 1.14 Zoning Ordinance-Outside Storage Issues February 15,2000 PS N/A Revise Tree Ordinance PS 1.57 Lighting Standards PL N/A Ord.480-JJ,revisions to impervious coverage and landscaping January 18,2000 regulations PL N/A Ord.480-II,regulations for non-residential carports and February 1,2000 parking garages PL 1.14 Ord.480-HH,outside storage and screen revisions February 15,2000 PL N/A Ord.480-GG,revisions regarding lights,lighting,and glare September 7, 1999 PL N/A Ord.483-H,changes in administrative processing of concept May 18, 1999 plans,development plans,site plans,and definitions PL N/A Ord.731 &Ord.480-EE,Sexually-oriented businesses February 2, 1999 All 2.71 Impact fee update PW 2 Drainage Master Plan Phase I: Inventory and data assembly Phase II:West Jones Branch Study Area Phase III: South Fork Kirkwood Branch Study Area Phase IV:Dove Creek study Area S/ED NA Landscape Ordinance Revisions Estimated June, 1999 CS 4.43 Park Dedication Ordinance-Fee Justification Study April 6, 1999 PS N/A Excavation Ordinance#693-A February 16, 1999 PL 3.0 Sexually Oriented Business Ord.No.731 February 2, 1999 PL/PS N/A Sign Ordinance Revisions(Ord.No. 704-A) December 1, 1998 CMO 3.43 Smoking Ordinance November 17, 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance 480-BB: Impervious Coverage October 20, 1998 PS 3.71 Health and Sanitation Ordinance October 20, 1998 PR 1.57 Land Acquisition Plan for Ultimate Build-out of Park System September 28, 1998 PR 1.25 Update of Parks and Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Presented to SPDC and Pk Board joint Meeting September 28, 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance Revision: Ordinance 704 September 1, 1998 PL/PS 1.57 Zoning Ordinance 480-CC:Residential Adjacency Standards July 21, 1998 (Neighboring Preservation Ord.)(also addressed parking issue) PL 1.00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update January 20, 1998 PL 2.33 Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A December 16, 1997 PL/CS 2.50 Sidewalk Ordinance December 16, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-Z(Service Station Regulation) August 19, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-Y(Personal Care Facilities) July 1, 1997 PL 2.00 Subdivision Ordinance—Park Dedication Provisions July 1, 1997 PL 2.67 Subdivision Ord. Thoroughfare References&Misc. June 17, 1997 CMO 3 Ordinance Codification(Administration portion) March 14, 1997 PL 1.00 Master Thoroughfare Plan Update March 4, 1997 PL 1.67 Zoning Ord.480-W(Telecommunication Towers&Antennas) February 4, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-X(Revisions to PUD density calculations) February 4, 1997, : >• PR 1.75 Master Plan for Bob Jones Park November 19, 1996 BLD N/A Grading(Earth Moving)Ordinance PR 2.00 Master Plan for Bicentennial Park November 19, 1996 Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 4 of 4 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Drainage Ordinance No. 605 TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Scott Martin and Debra Edmondson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas , City Engineer DATE OF REQUEST: June 5, 1998 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. We must mitigate the massive amount of new additional run-off which will be generated by the 200% to 300% increase in the impervious coverage from the expansion of S.H. 114 and its associated interchanges and "Fly-overs", the expansion of F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938, as well as the plethora of new commercial development associated with these three corridors. •2. We must eliminate the filling of or building within the "Flood Plains" of our city in order to protect the downstream properties. 3. We must mitigate the run-off of toxic materials, such as motor oil, hydraulic fluid, brake fluid, antifreeze, etc., from roadways, highways, parking lots, driveways, etc., in order to protect and prevent contamination of our underground water table, as well as our streams,ponds, and lakes and their associated wildlife. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. General Comments: These efforts should "dovetail" or pre-empt the Corp of Engineers, E.P.A. and the T.N.R.C.C. in regards to their anticipated new requirements/regulations in regards to the above listed concerns. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. • b. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PARS\DRAW ORD-03.DOC Form Date:06/16/00June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Sidewalk Trail Implementation Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: SPDC & Park Board Members STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hultman, Director of Community Services, 481-5581, ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. To prepare a plan for implementing trail and sidewalk construction per the Trail System master plan. Much like the sewer program. 2. 3. _______ SList any potential considerations. Do not define solution Y 1. Trail and sidewalk construction could be tied into CIP for street construction with consideration being given to whether adequate (ultimate) ROW exists. 2. Develop implementation plan in consent with planned Trail System Master Plan updated scheduled for 1999. 3. Identify potential opportunities for trail construction projects each year as SPDC CIP developed. General Comments: Street improvement CIP can be reviewed to identify opportunities to construct trails in conjunction with major street reconstruction. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. >. S NIECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITYWAFS\SIDEWALK TRAIL IMP-05.DOC Form Date:06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SSHORT TITLE: Citywide Strategic Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager, 481-5581, ext. 705 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Note: Staff has been involved with a workgroup since early this year. The workgroup has identified a consultant to recommend to the full council and a scope of services agreement is under negotiation. Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Ensure that the community, elected officials and staff are moving forward with a shared vision. 2. Create a forum for making informed decisions when setting budget priorities or deciding when • setting budget priorities or deciding among program alternatives. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Process should include community, elected officials, staff. 2. General Comments: Process has begun, but report needs to be inclusive of new Council members. May wish to consider updated survey data. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAPS\STRATEGIC PLAN-03.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •SHORT TITLE: Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: City Council CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development, 481-5581, ext. 750 DATE OF REQUEST: May 4, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Existing policy may not clearly articulate the type and quality of entities we desire 2. Existing policy may not clearly request adequate information that council and staff need for proper review and consideration __— O3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. May desire clearer definition of criteria such as employment levels, investment levels, required infrastructure, and impact on the community such as environment and housing 2. May desire inclusion of a formal application 3. General Comments: As the city anticipates an increase in commercial development along S.H. 114,we would like to provide a policy that clearly describes the entities and investment we desire. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Staff contacted over 45 communities within the DFW Metroplex to survey if they have a current tax abatement policy. Further, staff has reviewed the policies of 22 communities and Tarrant County for comparative purposes, and has also contacted the City of Austin. Sb. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITy\PAFS\Tax abate policy-01.DOC Form Date:May 14,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Sk SHORT TITLE: City Initiated Rezonings TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Ronnie Kendall, City Councilmember STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Potential for development to occur on tracts currently zoned more intensively than might be desired. 2. Less control on already zoned tracts. 3. SList any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. A list of zonings which do not conform to the 1998 LUP recommendations was included in the data accumulated for the 1998 LUP update. 2. Look at all properties zoned "C-3" to see if"C-2" or "C-1" would be more appropriate to the intensive uses of the surrounding areas. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. Sc. NAECONDEVNPROIECTSTRIORITY\PAFS\REZONINGS-03.DOC Form Date: March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM OSHORT TITLE: HOTEL/MOTEL REGULATIONS TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Greg Last, Community Development Director CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Art Wright, Zoning Assistant DATE OF REQUEST: 12/98 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. To establish regulations to insure quality hotel developments in Southlake 2. 3. 411. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Proximity of restaurants, shopping, services, etc. 2. Permit hotels in certain districts by Specific Use Permit. 3. Bed and Breakfast establishments General Comments: General desire is to insure quality commercial growth, particularly along the SH 114 corridor where more regional types of services might be provided. We want to be able to assure potential corporate relocations that only hotels of a certain standard would be constructed along the corridor in order to maintain a professional image for the corridor. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\HOTEL REGS-02.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Underground Utilities TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Baron Rittiner (817) 491-3939 CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: Citizen STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper,Director of Public Works DATE OF REQUEST: 3/22/99 DATE RECEIVED: 4-15-99 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Visual pollution. 2. Proliferation of overhead utility cables and poles - see Kimball Avenue and S.H. 114 (NW corner). S 3. Lack of maintenance of utility poles - crooked, leaning - see south side of S.H. 114 between Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Total cost of relocating overhead utilities over a 25-35 year period of rapid growth would exceed cost to bury. 2. Dual certification - TU/Tri-County guarantees that Southlake will have a much worse problem over time than surrounding cities. General Comments: Long term visual and aesthetic impact of overhead utilities will have a significant negative economic impact. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Flower Mound- F.M. 2499 - overhead utilities moved underground. b. April 97 - breakfast with Curtis Hawk to discuss this issue. c. Shawn Poe is researching S.H. 114 utility easements. • L:\COMDEV\WP-FILESTROJECTSTRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRKunder-02..doc Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 2 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •SHORT TITLE: Commercial Dumpster Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX, OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Many of the commercial customers are not using dumpsters, rather, they set out their garbage as if they were a residential customer. this leads to a large number of plastic bags, etc.,placed on the roadway in areas such as FM 1709. 2. In the residential neighborhoods, builders pile up the scrap material and other waste, to be S removed later. Not only is this unsightly, with the wind this is a problem with paper and other such debris being blown about the area. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. General Comments: Requiring all commercial customers to use a dumpster, and requiring homebuilders to use a dumpster (which could perhaps be shared in subdivision where houses are being constructed next door to each other, would go a long way in cleaning up our City. SList any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\COMDUMP-02.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Utility Placement Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 779 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Location of improvements to public utilities within the City. 2. Lack of communication with Franchise holders (other utility companies). 03. Large number of utilities in City ROW. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Telecommunications Act may have impacted this area of control. 2. Utility companies have individual franchise agreements. 3. General Comments: Many meetings have been held with the utility companies jointly and individually. Utility companies do not want more regulations. City staff has received more cooperation since discussions started on a new ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. ea. b. NAECONDEV\ROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAPS\UTILITY PLACEMENT-03.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Correcting inconsistencies between "Frontage," "Front Yard," "Lot Frontage" TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision_, Major Revision X Type: Ordinance_, Master Plan Component_, Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Corner lots require front yard setback on each street frontage. 2. Ordinance requires "front" of the lot to be the lot line along the street which has the least dimension. 3. Builders want the flexibility to choose which street to front. 4. These inconsistencies have caused addressing and permitting problems. 5. There are a growing number of"flag or panhandle lots"being submitted as infill properties are being • developed. 6. Better define where lot width is measured. (Staffs interpretation: measured at the minimum front yard setback). 7. Establish a minimum lot width for non-residential lots. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Consider adding a development regulation for "Side Yards Adjacent to Street"like PUD's have in their regulations. 2. Establish minimum criteria for approval of flag lots(e.g.,maximum number of lots,maximum acreage, etc.). 3. Consider reducing the minimum lot width of cul-de-sac lots to 85' instead of the required 100' for residential lots so that only the minimum required front setback is shown on the plat. 4. Revise'yard definitions to better evaluate the appropriate setbacks, especially on irregularly-shaped lots. 5. Determine whether adequate lot frontage is achieved by the lot abutting a public street or by accessing a public street by means of a common access easement. If the lot does not have to abut a public street, how are the required setbacks established...where are the front, side, and rear yards of the lot? General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached,to'this request. a. N/A III N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTSTRIORITY\PAFSTRONT YARD-04.DOC File Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 • t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Noise Ordinance Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson/Chief Bldg. Services, ext. 726 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Provisions are needed for measuring noise in area covered by Noise Control Ordinance. 2. Add section on standards for noise control to give a clear definition of noise violations. 3. Sist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Establish standards to assist those responsible for the enforcement of noise control. 2. Standards as it pertains to noise violations: Tools, instruments, examples How to measure. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Grapevine b. Existing Ordinance No. 484 „ •c. Plano N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFSWOISE-04.DOC Form Date:June 13,2000 Page 1 of 1 i t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •SHORT TITLE: Southlake Historical Commission TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: City Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager DATE OF REQUEST: 2-2-99 DATE RECEIVED: BY: ---------------- Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. A formal program to preserve Southlake history is needed as the"human resources" currently available to document historical events and places diminish within our community. 2. Effort would need to be coordinated with Southlake Historical Society. 3. SListan otential considerations. Do not define solution Yp ( ) 1. 2. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. S N:\ECONDEVTROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\HISTORICAL COM-03.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 • t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Storm Water Utility District TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 775 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Need method of financing drainage improvements besides property tax. 2. Storm Water Master Plan is being developed which will define the drainage needs by basin and by creek branch. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Surrounding cities have already instituted such a drainage district. 2. 3. General Comments: Storm Water Utility District would also finance the engineering for the Master Plan along with capital improvements and maintenance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Cities of Grapevine, Keller, Colleyville all have such districts. b. ,; " • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTSIPRIORITY\PAFS\STORMWATER UTIL-04.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •SHORT TITLE: Youth Master Plan Development TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: City Manager's Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman DATE OF REQUEST: 2-3-98 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Youth programs offered in Southlake are good and SYAC is at a point where it could really take off,but we have not yet undertaken a focused and organized approach to determine the types of programs and services we need to offer children, youth and families. There is currently no formal road map guiding the community for youth initiatives. Through SYAC, the Youth Park Board and Southlake Parks and Recreation Board, the Drug & 02. Alcohol Committee, local school districts and other community groups, the City of Southlake has an extensive community network of citizens (both youth and adults) to actively provide input into the development of a youth master plan. These groups also provide a framework through which services and programs could be offered. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. A broad cross-section of the Southlake community should be involved in the development of the plan. 2. The plan could be very expansive or limited in scope, but would probably require the appointment of a citizen steering committee to guide the process. 3. Strong coordination would be needed to ensure existing resources are involved and active in the process. The development of a Youth Master Plan should be a comprehensive effort. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. ea. ICMA award-winning plans from Claremont, CA and Corpus Christi, TX N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\YOUTH MP-02.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 2 • ` PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Street Standards Ordinance (Revision to Ordinance 217) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, 481-5581, ext. 814 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Street construction materials have changed. 3. Opportunity to develop a"Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. List anypotential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Construction standards -- i.e., materials, testing methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG b. TxDOT S N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORI YVAFS\STREET STDS ORD-03.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM OSHORT TITLE: Emergency Preparedness Notification Program TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: Ronnie Kendall CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Chief Ricky Black DATE OF REQUEST: May 18, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 18, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Inadequate emergency warning notification system 2. Increased concern by community due to recent tornado activity. 3. any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) •List 1. Capital outlays and maintenance costs. p Y 2. Consider methods of notification for both indoor, outdoor and in vehicle. 3. Develop a system that clearly communicates direction to affected persons being notified. General Comments: Develop a comprehensive system that identifies all means of notifying the community of an impending disaster, tornado or hazardous materials incident. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Review specifications/packages of surrounding cities b. Emergency Management Plan c. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Emergency Prep-02.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •HORT TITLE: Landscape Ordinance Revisions /Consolidation TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF xx , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator DATE OF REQUEST: May 24, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 24, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Architects, Developers and Builders often review either the Landscape Ordinance or Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance and fail to realize that there are other landscape requirements. 2. _,_ ist an otential considerations. Do not define solution YP ( ) 1. Consider consolidating the Landscape Ordinance and Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance into a single document. 2. General Comments: To reduce confusion, Section 42 (Bufferyards) of the Zoning Ordinance can be added to the Landscape Ordinance and any needed references in the zoning ordinance can indicate that developers shall comply with the Bufferyard requirements as outlined in the Landscape Ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. None b. . S N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Landsc Ord-03.doc Form Date:06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 • i PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Street Light Standards Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Pamela Muller STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, Ext. 814 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-30-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-30-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Control glare. 2. Enhance country atmosphere of community, while providing safe lighting. 3. Driving safety,provide visibility without blinding lights. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Limit candlepower. 2. Shield light direction. 3. Floodlights, searchlights. General Comments: Take into consideration zoning categories, light direction,parking lots,buildings, athletic stadiums/fields, parks. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Town of Kennebunkport Ob. City of Plano c. Maine study N ECONDEV NPROJECTSTRIORITYTAFS\STREET LIGHT-04.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 • ` PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Trail System Master Plan Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kevin Hugman STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services, 481-5581, ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Per City Charter, the Trail System Master Plan needs to be reviewed and updated in four years. It was adopted in August 1995. 2. Current TSMP is being reviewed by staff consultant, ad-hoc committee of council and Park Board. 03. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Considerations should be given to opportunities to link parks, school sites, and other sites of interest, and deletion of trails that are no longer feasible or wanted. 2. TSMP trail width consideration need to include right of way issues, cost issues, and citizen desires 3. General Comments: Revision needs to include citizen involvement through SPIN List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Trail Master Plans in other cities b. Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIOR►TY\PAFS\TRAIL MP-04.DOC Form Date:06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM ,, SHORT TITLE: Residential PUD -Reduction in Minimum Acreage Requirement (Land • Conservation District) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Councilmembers Scott Martin, Gary Fawks, Pam Muller(Ex-councilmember) STAFF•CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Infill properties (less than 50-acres in size) have presented certain development challenges, such as lotting configuration, access, street alignments, screening and buffering, etc. 2. Appears to be a need for flexibility in infill development. ----------------------------------- 0 List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. The amount of dedicated open space needs to be reviewed. Currently, the ordinance requires a minimum of 10% for properties being developed residentially. 2. General Comments: Staff supports this concept; however, we recommend that the R-PUD not be reduced below 5 or 10 acres. Currently, R-PUD's require a minimum of 50 acres. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Limited research has been completed. .:: N:ECONDEV\PROJECTSTRIORTTYIPAFSUtPUD-AC-o4.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM •SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Resurrect Ord. 480-V (20+ clean-up items) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Clarify the variance language in the S-P-1/S-P-2 districts. 2. Revise the definition of accessory buildings/uses and address the regulation of these structures/uses. 3. Change the method of calculating parking spaces for multiple buildings constructed on the same lot. 4. Revise the roadway cross-section references in the bufferyard section to correspond with the changes in • the Master Thoroughfare Plan. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. This ordinance has been worked on a great deal and has been before P&Z once. There were many changes recommended to wording in the original ordinance. General Comments: Minor changes will need to be made to the current draft before it can be brought forward. Readvertisement will also have'to occur prior to public hearing on this ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A , S N:\ECONDEVIPROJECTSTRIORITYWAFSW80-V-04.DOC March 18,1999 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Septic Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Gary Fawks CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works, 481-5581, ext. 779 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Septic systems in an urban residential setting and to saturate the soils thereby causing runoff. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Tarrant County Public Health Dept. serves as the city's provider of this service. 2. One acre lots can have "on-site" disposal system. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. S N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\SEPTIC ORD-05.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Special Events Permit and Procedures TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 5/97 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Currently we have no process whereby special events (school carnivals, retail promotions, art festivals, etc.) can be approved. 2. Town Square development references the issuance of Specific Use Permits for special outdoor events. The discussion at the time was that the ordinance would be amended to create a SUP for such events. • List anypotential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Need to address length of permit, frequency of permits, hours of operation, alcoholic beverage sales, parking, lighting, signage, traffic management issues 2. General Comments: I would suggest that for certain of these events that the Council consider amending the accessory use section and establish certain criteria for Staff approval of these permits, like the tent permit for retail sales. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Research in progress. • NIECONDEV\PROJECTSTRIORPMPAFS\.SPECIAL EVENTS-04.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM t OSHORT TITLE: Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services Director DATE OF REQUEST: March 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Recent land acquisition opportunities adjacent to Bob Jones Park have significantly altered the original park boundaries. 2. Develop a new park master development plan to include these areas. 3. .ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution v ' 1. Next phase of construction has been conceptually planned and reviewed by Park Board and SPDC. 2. Review and update of Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan will include a general concept plan of Bob Jones Park, which can then be further refined, detailed as necessary. 3. Current long range CIP projects for Bob Jones Park are included in currant concept plan. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. . s:. N:\ECONDEV\PROIECTSTRIORITY\PAFS\BOB JONES MP-02.DOC Form Date:06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SSHORT TITLE: Amortization of Certain Uses TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: Process for the Board of Adjustment REQUESTED BY: City Council STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/25/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The property at the northwest corner of Highland and SH 114 2. The pool chemical facility in East Haven Addition along Continental SList any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Will require budgeting professional services for a forensic accountant to evaluate the business records of the affected companies. 2. Will require a great deal of the city attorney's time monitoring the Board of Adjustment proceedings. General Comments: We have discussed the amortization of these uses in the past. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\AMORTIZ-02.DOC March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 , PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Ss ' HORT TITLE: Parade and Street Closure Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Expanding city coupled with civic pride will increase requests for parades and street closures. 2. Differing opinions and groups will be requesting permission to parade in downtown. 3. Need mechanism to regulate othern than SUP. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) Ill. Establish ordinance to regulate parades and street closings. 2. Low or no fee for neighborhoods. 3. Public Works review, DPS review, Code Enforcement review process. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Fort Worth b. Arlington c. Dallas and other ordinances S NAECONDEV TROJECTSTRIORITYVAFSTARADE-02.DOC Form Date:June 13,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM *HORT TITLE: Election Signs Regulations TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: SPIN Standing Committee CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief of Building Services ext. 726 DATE OF REQUEST: June, 2000 DATE RECEIVED: June, 2000 BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Numerous complaints were received by City staff and SPIN Representatives about the number, location, and timing of signs. 2. There were numerous violations of existing ordinances that surpassed Code Endorsements ability to monitor. 3. ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. First Amendment free speech rights 2. Use of public rights of way 3. Risk of having different standards than for commercial signs. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Current ordinance (available from Malcolm) b. Legal opinion from City Attorney c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Election Signs Reg.-01.doc Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 • t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SSHORT TITLE: Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: Community Services Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman DATE OF REQUEST: 2-2-99 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Trash accumulation on streets and in bar ditches significantly deters from the attractiveness of the city. •2. In connection with the establishment of entry portal sites,the City of Southlake should look for opportunities for beautification projects (i.e., Wal Mart strip), tree planting demonstration programs, etc. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Coordination with KSB and other community groups 2. Identification of code enforcement issues. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. • a. NIECONDEV TROJECTSTRIORITYTAFS\CLEAN STRT-02.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: SUP for Commercial Uses in Industrial Districts (amendment to Zoning Ord.) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Developers & Land Owners in Commerce Business Park STAFF CONTACT: Greg Last or Karen Gandy, ZoningAdministrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 3/98 DATE RECEIVED: BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. There are multiple uses within the light industrial park that could benefit from the ability to have a small retail component. 2. It might allow businesses to grow within Southlake and remain in Southlake. 3. 4ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. General Comments: There appear to be two options, create a mixed use business district or amend the existing SUP (#31) and increase the allowed percentage of retail in the designated districts. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. S N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\SUP INDUSTRIAL-0I.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 `• PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services Director DATE OF REQUEST: March 1999 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Review master plan concept and revise to incorporate recent land acquisitions and as-built park components. 2. Review maintenance facility layout, access roads, and future park facility needs. 3. III: _ ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Consideration to planned facilities that are included I SPDC CIP and determination as to where they can be constructed. This will determine if further land acquisitions are necessary, timeline for acquisition, and specific parcels to target. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. •c. NAECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\BIC PARK MP-02.DOC Form Date:06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM k SHORT TITLE: Rules of the City Council TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: XX REQUESTED BY: Patsy Dupre/Ronnie Kendall CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Sandra LeGrand DATE OF REQUEST: May 18, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: May 18, 1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 01. 2. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\CC rules-01.DOC Form Date:May 20,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM *HORT TITLE: Ordinance No. 480-KK TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Malcolm Jackson CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Planning, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: March, 2000 DATE RECEIVED: March, 2000 BY: KPG Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The Building Services Division proposes revisions to the noise Standards 2. The Zoning Ordinance has sections regarding regulation of noise. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) •1. Consider deletingreferences to noise standards in the ZoningOrdinance in order to prevent conflicting standards. 2. 3. General Comments: This ordinance has been drafted and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. It is scheduled for Council discussion on July 18th and P&Z aciton on July 20tn List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. , " • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITy\PAFS\Ordinance No.480-1CK-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SSHORT TITLE: Ordinance No. 480-LL TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Councilmembers Fauks and Potter and Staff CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Planning, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: March, 2000 DATE RECEIVED: March, 2000 BY: KPG Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Clarify that no outside storage/display can occur without a SUP.(even if the applicant meets the screening requirements). • 2. Clarify if all outside storage/display (if approved by SUP) can be located forward of the principal building or if the outside storage forward of the principal building is limited to only those uses specifically listed in Section 45.11a3 (e.g., newspaper racks, bagged goods, ect.) 3. Clarify the screening requirements for plant sales areas whether in front of the building visible • from rights-of-way or elsewhere on the lot. 4. Reconsider the appropriate location/screening of prepackaged ice and vending machines. 5. Review each non-residential district, permitted use section, deleting any reference to outside storage/display being a permitted use by right(e.g nursery yards in the B-1 and B-2 districts) List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. May consider exempting certain uses from outside storage/display ordinance provisions. 2. 3. General Comments: This ordinance has been drafted and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. It is scheduled for Council discussion on July 18th and P&Z action on July 20th List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. Sa. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Ordinance No.480-LL-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Thoroughfare Plan Amendment: Peytonville/Shady Oaks Connection TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: _ CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bruce Payne, Planning, ext. 767 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) Notes: As discussed earlier this year, a connection between Peytonville and Shady Oaks through the Clow property 1. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) el• 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Thoroughfare Plan Amed-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM *HORT TITLE: Ordinance Establishing Regulations on Corps' Property TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Garland Wilson CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety DATE OF REQUEST: 6/13/00 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Citizen's who live adjacent to Corp property have concerns for unlawful acts occurring on Corp property. 2. Corp of Engineers are substantial understaffed, and cannot address the concerns of the citizens. In fact, the Corp has begun to refer complaints of all nature to Southlake DPS to address. 3. Being federal property, the Southlake Department of Public Safety has minimal authority to 111 address the concerns that are being presented by the affected residents to date. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Customer service has waned due to our lack of to enforcement authority for Corp property"rules". 2. There currently no codified authority provided for officers to address such issues. 3. General Comments: Other area municipalities which have been affected in the same manner have adopted ordinance that provides officers the authority to enter onto, and enforce laws/rules established under the authority of the Corp of Engineers. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. .,, •c. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Corp Regs-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM HORT TITLE: Ord. 774, Amending Trail System Master Plan to require all trails to be 8 ft in width. lik TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Park Board member Bill Kemp CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services DATE OF REQUEST: February 2000 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Revise Trail System Master Plan to require all designated trails be eight feet(8'). Currently, only trail on North White Chapel is designated at 8', all other trails are designated to be six feet(6') in width. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 01. Existing right of way and Master Thoroughfare Plan requirements accommodate current designated widths. May be potential concern in some areas. 2. Citizen involvement in initial Trail System Master Plan development did not favor wider trails. 3. General Comments: Trail System Master Plan currently being studied for revision. Process will include comprehensive review of Plan and numerous public meetings for input. This potential revision can be considered within the process of the Master Plan revision. Expected review by City Council in late 2000. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. Sc. I.:cOMDENWP-FILEsTAOJECTs\PRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRMWBLANKS.doc Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM IlkHOR T TITLE: Alternative Entry Design Standards for residential Developments Abutting Arterial Roads. TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Commissioner Ken Horn CC , P&Z X , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy/Art Wright/Chris Carpenter DATE OF REQUEST: 5/25/00 DATE RECEIVED: 4/25/00 BY: KPG, AW, CLC Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Too many walled communities, especially along arterial roadways in the low Density Residential areas of Town. 2. Find alternative ways to design entrances to residential developments which abut arterial roadways. 03. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Combination of berming, treed and landscaped medians, circulation drive in front of residential lots in lieu of fences and walls. 2. Prevent"tunnel" effect along major corridors. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Look at lots abutting South Ridge Lakes Parkway b. •c. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Alternative Entry Design of Res.Dev..doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM IlkHORT TITLE: Residential Lighting Standards Review TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision x , Major Revision Type: Ordinance x , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Rex Potter CC x , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Building Services—481-5581 ext 726 DATE OF REQUEST: 9-7-99 DATE RECEIVED: 9-7-99 BY: M. Jackson Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. No current regulations regarding lighting standards for residential occupancy. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) •1. Issues can arise primarilyfor residential sport court lighting p g g 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. S N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Residential Lighting-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Elevator Ordinance Regulations TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance x , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Malcolm Jackson CC ,P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF x , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Building Services—481-5581 ext 726 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-13-00 DATE RECEIVED: 6-13-00 BY: M. Jackson Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. No current regulations regarding elevator installation/inspections. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) •1. Current state regulations require annual inspections but companies may not initially report their existence and are therefore never inspected. 2. Local ordinance required to post information on last date/time of inspection in the elevators. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITy\PAFS\Elevators-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM likHORT TITLE: Substandard Building Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision x , Major Revision Type: Ordinance x , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Malcolm Jackson CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF x , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Building Services—481-5581 ext 726 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-13-00 DATE RECEIVED: 6-13-00 BY: M. Jackson Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Current ordinance procedures not in full compliance with recent court rulings on hearing procedures. 2. 3. 'ist any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. r>. Sc. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Substandard bldgs-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM aHORT TITLE: High Grass/Weeds TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision x , Major Revision Type: Ordinance x , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Malcolm Jackson CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF x , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Building Services—481-5581 ext 726 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-13-00 DATE RECEIVED: 6-13-00 BY: M. Jackson Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Current ordinance procedures not in full compliance with recent court rulings on abatement and hearing procedures. 2. 3. SList any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\High grass-OI.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: False Alarm Reduction Program TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Patsy DuPree CC XX , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Chief Ricky Black DATE OF REQUEST: October 1, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: October 1, 1999 BY: GW Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Excessive amount of false police, fire and EMS alarms 2. Increased opportunity for an accident responding with lights and sirens unnecessarily 3. Increases response times to "real" emergencies when public safety is dedicated to a false alarm scene. 541st any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Cost impact to community/city 2. Consider educational opportunities. 3. Develop an accountability system for alarm users. General Comments: Develop a program that is aimed at reducing the number of incidences that public safety is responding to false alarms. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Research surrounding cities alarm ordinances b. Review models from the National Burglar and Fire Alarm Association c. Review State Law 0 N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\FaIse Alarm-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM *HORT TITLE: 1997 Uniform Fire Code TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision XX , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Chief Black CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF XX , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Chief Black DATE OF REQUEST: October 1, 1999 DATE RECEIVED: June 1, 2000 BY: RB Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Current Ordinance recognizes the 1991 Uniform Fire Code which is outdated. 2. Large residential homes that may exceed capabilities of fire suppression crews within the first five minutes on-scene. 3. SList any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Cost and maintenance to the citizens/developers/builders 2. Effects on current fire suppression activities 3. Comply with up-to-date codes/standards General Comments: To update the current ordinance adopting the fire codes and includes a requirement for residential sprinkling at 6000 square ft. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Council of Governments Committee recommendations on the 1997 UFC b. 1997 Uniform Fire Code • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Uniform Fire Code-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 • ` PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance (Revisions to Ord. 217) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, 481-5581, ext. 814 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Water and sewer construction materials have changed. Opportunity to develop a"Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Construction standards -- i.e., materials, testing, construction methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG Standards •b. TxDOT Standards N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAPS\UTILITY POLICY-03.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Ord. 483-I, Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing park dedication requirements. TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Park Board member Bill Kemp CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB X , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services DATE OF REQUEST: January 2000 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Revise current park dedication requirements for residential and non-residential development to include addition of a park improvement fee, allow Park Board ability to designate land recommended to be dedicated, and reduce credits for private park facilities. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) el. City Attorney research regarding establishment of park improvement fees. 2. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan currently being reviewed for revision by consultant and staff Once Master Plan approved, revisions may result in broad ordinance changes to incorporate Master Plan recommendations. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. I. • N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\PARK DEDICATION-02.DOC Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of I ` PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM • SHORT TITLE: Sign Ordinance Revisions (704-B) Open House Signs TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Bldg. Services STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Bldg. Services ext. 726 DATE OF REQUEST: June 13, 2000 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Consideration of signs along divided Hwy.114 relative to size and visibility. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Width the development along 114 and the distances applicable to roadway not considered for • divided highway. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\ECONDEVTROJECTSTRIORITYTAFSISIGN ORD-05.DOC Form Date: 06/16/00 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Mass Gathering Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety, ext 730 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) S. 2. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. . S N:IECONDEV\PROJECTSTRIORITYWAFSWASS GATHERING-02.DOC Form Date:March 16,1999 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Health and Sanitation Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Tarrant County Health Dept STAFF CONTACT: Malcolm Jackson, ext. 726 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Adopt ordinance similar to other cities as recommended by Tarrant Co. Health Dept. 2. Address food handlers training requirements 3. No all food establishments comply with health rules. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 01. Write ordinance providing requirements for food manager certification and food handler training g g certificates. 2. Compare similar Food Handler Ordinances of other cities in the area. 3. General Comments: According to the Tarrant Co. Health Dept., most food establishments comply voluntarily. Ordinance would bring all food establishments up to current health standards. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Grapevine b. Euless c. River Oaks (Ordinance No. 414) S N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\HEALTH SANITATION-02.DOC Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM &HORT TITLE: Flood Plain Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision X , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Debra Edmonson CC X , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, 481-5581 x 779 DATE OF REQUEST: 6-16-1999 DATE RECEIVED: 6-16-1999 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) •List 1. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • LACOMDEV\WP-FILESTROJECTSTRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRMMFIIod-01.doc Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: City of Southlake Annual Report TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: REQUESTED BY: Public Information Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: James Kunke (ext. 819) DATE OF REQUEST: 6/13/00 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Many residents of Southlake are unaware of how the city spends tax dollars each year of of how major projects are completed 2. Current communications methods are geared toward short-term information, leaving resients with little feel for the larger scope of city operations. 2. No tool currently exists to communicate Southlake's community climate or municipal approach to • people or businesses outside the city, especially as a recruiting device for corporate prospects. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. A quality annual report can be costly to produce. 2. Unless some effort is made to make the annual report relevant throughout the year,residents are unlikely to look at it beyond the initial delivery of the report. 3. General Comments: I believe that the annual report can be made more useful to residents if it is printed in a calendar format, listing events throughout the year in addition to highlights of city operations in every department. It is also a good way to demonstrate to residents the often unseen efforts made on their behalf everyday, as well as to reassure them that the city is using its fiscal resources wisely. ----- ----- - List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. •a. none attached, although I am able to provide multiple examples of annual reports and/or calendars to anyone interested. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\City Annual Report.doc Form Date:June 16,2000 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Resident Satisfaction Survey TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project X Other: Would continue project conducted in 1995 and 1997 REQUESTED BY: Public Information Office CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: James Kunke, ext. 819 DATE OF REQUEST: 6/13/00 DATE RECEIVED: BY: _ Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Other than anecdotal evidence, often provided at public meetings by people energized by a specific situation, there is little effort made to determine the level of resident satisfaction with city operations and projects. 2. Because of that lack of an overall view of residents' opinions, decisions have to be made based on the input of only a few people or a single neighborhood. This can result in decisions that create a strong negative reaction from other groups of residents. lik. Smaller, topic-specific surveys currently are conducted as needed by various departments (such as the current Teen Center survey0 when they could more effectively be combined into a broader professional survey conducted every other year. Results of the larger survey would give us a baseline for conducting topic-specific surveys if needed. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Other cities have found that resident satisfaction surveys can identify potential problems before they arise. For example if a large number of residents voice displeasure about a code enforcement issue, the council can readily address that issue by ordinance. 2. Surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997 provide us a baseline for a 2001 survey. If a third survey were conducted, we could begin tracking trends to see where residents have noted improved services and where they perceive weaknesses. The results of the two pervious surveys also could help guide portions of the new survey. General Comments: It is becoming increasingly common among cities to conduct professional surveys in order to gauge the satisfaction level of residents with regard to city services and future projects. This could provide us with a valuable planning tool for the city and also could help city staff improve service delivery°to residents. 9 Results of this survey would be used to create a specific action plan to guide applicable operations during the subsequent two years. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITy\PAFS\Resident Satisfaction Survey.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Drainage Master Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component XX , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Harper, Director of Public Works,481-5581, ext. 779 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The only infrastructure system without a Master Plan. 2. As the City develops, storm water runoff will become more critical. 3. Develop a CIP and maintenance plan. ilk List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Phase I, data collection is completed. 2. Because storm water crosses political boundaries, the City will need to coordinate with surrounding cities. 3. EPA- Clean Water Act and other environmental acts will impact decision. General Comments: Actual development of Master Plan has begun. • West Jones Branch engineering design is complete. Easements are being acquired. Bids will be taken Fall 1999. • South Fork of Kirkwood Branch is 30% designed. •List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Phase I - Master Drainage Plan section • Executive Summary NIECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITYTAFSDRAIN MP-03.DOC Form Date:March 19,1999 Page 1 of 1 f PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: City Zoning Ordinance Rewrite—Conversion to a Unified Development Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bruce Payne DATE OF REQUEST: 6-14-00 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Existing ordinance text is overly complex and unclear as to specific requirements for development and land use. Council vision may not be clearly articulated. 2. There are a large number of identified proposed changes to the existing ordinance, as well as a high number of requested and granted variances which suggests that the current ordinance may not be working well. 03. The level of interest at the Council level and advisory boards maynow be high enough for a major g g J revision effort List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Will require intensive staff effort to prepare a draft ordinance, however, a model ordinance is available to guide the process. 2. Will require significant review time for P&Z and City Council. 3. Revised text may result in need for some map amendments. General Comments: A unified development code would consolidate all land use and development requirements into a single, appropriately cross-referenced code book. The format would be logical and cleanly presented. Allowable uses would focus more on the land use impacts (performance measures) rather than the specific economic activity (e.g. book stores vs clothing stores). List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Unified Development Ordinance by Michael Brough fib. N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Unified Dev Code-01.doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM III SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Lighting Standards TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF X , OTHER: DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Add section on "Lighting Standards"to the zoning ordinance. 2. Address the adjacency issues between residential and nonresidential developments. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1111. Establish measurable (enforceable) standards to assist building inspections and code enforcement. 2. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A S N:\ECONDEV\PROJECTS\PRIORITy\PAFS\LIGHTING STDS-05.DOC October 24,1996 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM *HORT TITLE: Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Regualtions of the Zoning Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Gary Fawks CC x , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Planning, ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: February, 1997 DATE RECEIVED: BY: _ Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Concerned about buildings on the corridor not having pitched roofs. 2. Concerned about screening of HVAC equipment on the roofs. 3. any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) .List 1. _ _ 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. • N:\Econdev\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PAFS\Corridor Overly Regs..doc Form Date:June 12,2000 Page 1 of 1 r Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 2 - PROJECT RANKING ,High----Low Results PAF 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PW Drainage Ordinance Revisions 80% Yes Comment:Intend to begin after elections. CS Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan 10% Yes Comment:In conjunction with TSMP update. CM Citywide Strategic Plan 50% Yes ED Revisions to Tax Abatement Policy 20% Yes Comment:Significant research collected.Priority has been the Kirkwood Road Closure issue. PL City-Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update 70% Yes Comment:Staff preparation complete,pending workgroup HOLD direction PL Hotel/Motel Regulations in Zoning Ordinance 25% Yes Comment:Staff completed first draft, waiting on establishing a workgroup. PW Underground utilities 70% Yes CM Commercial Dumpster Ordinance 50% Yes HOLD • PW Utility Placement Ordinance 70% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard Issues(Workgroup) 10% Yes PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484 90% Yes CM Southlake Historical Commission 50% Yes PW Storm Water Utility District 80% Yes CS Youth Master Plan Development 0% Yes PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord. 217) 75% Yes PS/PL Emergency Preparedness Notification Program 80% Yes PS/PL Revise Landscape Ordinance to include bufferyards etc. 0% Yes PW Street Light Standards 0% Yes CS/PL Trail System Master Plan Update 20% Yes PL Zoning Ord: Reduce Residential PUD Min.Acreage 50% Yes (land conservation revision) HOLD Comment: On hold per request of workgroup. PL Zoning Ordinance 480-V-Misc. Clean-up Items Phase I 80% Yes PW Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance 70% Yes PW Septic Ordinance 25% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-Special Events Permit&Procedures 80% Yes Comment:Staff has completed first draft CS Revise Bob Jones Park Master Development Plan 75% Yes • Comment:In conjunction with Parks Master Plan update and Bob Jones Development Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 1 of 4 - Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 2 -PROJECT RANKING nigh----Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score PL Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses(on hold) 50% Yes Comment:ZBA orientation/procedures completed by staff awaiting city attorney's review and council direction. PS Parade and Street Closure Ordinance 5% Yes PS Sign Ordinance Revisions 0% Yes CS Clean Streets/Beautiful City Project: 0% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance-SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial 5% Yes Districts Comment:Idea has not been supported by PZ or CC in past. CS Revise Bicentennial Park Master Development Plan: 40% Yes CM Rules of the City Council 0% Yes CM Trash pick-up contract review 0% Yes PL Ord.480-KK,revising noise standards 80% Yes Comment:Staff preparation and City Attorney review complete, waiting on discussion at CC on 7-18-00, consideration by PZ on 7-20-00 PL Ord.480-LL,revising outside storage/screening regulations 0% Yes • PL Growth management study 85% Comment:Final report pending in workgroup PL Thoroughfare Plan Amendment:Peytonville/Shady Oaks 25% Yes connection HOLD Comment: On hold at Council(work group to be formed of area residents) PS Ordinance Establishing Regulations on Corps' Property 0% Yes CS Ord. 774,Amending Trail system Master Plan to require all 60% No trails to be 8 feet in width PL Elimination of perimeter walls and fences around residential 0% Yes subdivisions in low density areas along arterial roadways. PS Residential lighting standards review 0% Yes PS Elevator Ordinance 0% Yes PS Substandard Bldg. Ordinance 0% Yes PS High Grass/Weeds Ordinance revision 0% Yes PS False Alarm Reduction Program 90% Yes PS 1997 Uniform Fire Code 90% Yes PL Unified Development Code 0% Yes PW Ord.483-I Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance changing 0% Yes park dedication requirements PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(704-B) Open House Signs 0% Yes PS Mass Gathering Ordinance 0% Yes • PW Health and Sanitation Ordinance 0% Yes PW Flood Plain Ordinance 0% Yes Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 2 of 4 4 Priority MASTER SCHEDULE - City Council Project Priorities STEP 2 -PROJECT RANKING igh---Low Results % PAF 1 2345 Dept Item Comp Enc. Rank Score CM City of Southlake Annual Report 0% Yes CM Resident Satisfaction Survey 0% Yes PW Drainage Master Plan 0% Yes PL Conversion to a Unified Development Ordinance 0% Yes PL Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Lighting Standards 0% Yes PL Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Regulations 0% Yes N:\Econdev\P ROJ ECTS\PRIORITY\Reports\2000-06-12.doc Department Legend: PW=Public Works, PL=Planning,CS=Community Services,CM=City Manager, SEC=City Secretary,FI=Finance,PS=Public Safety,HR=Human Resources,ED=Economic Development Note: If you would like to request a Project Advocacy Form(PAF), please contact Greg at 481-5581, x750 or E-mail: glast@ci.southlake.tx.us 4110 • Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 3 of 4 ' Following are Completed Projects from Previous Priority Schedules Sept CC Rank Item Date Approved by Council PL N/A Thoroughfare Plan Amendment:Nolen Drive,SH 114 to June 6,2000 Crooked Lane PL 1.14 Zoning Ordinance-Outside Storage Issues February 15,2000 PS N/A Revise Tree Ordinance PS 1.57 Lighting Standards PL N/A Ord.480-JJ,revisions to impervious coverage and landscaping January 18,2000 regulations PL N/A Ord.480-II,regulations for non-residential carports and February 1,2000 parking garages _ PL 1.14 Ord.480-HH,outside storage and screen revisions February 15,2000 PL N/A Ord.480-GG,revisions re ardin lights,lighting,and glare September 7, 1999 PL N/A • •.483-H,changes in administrative processing of concept May 18, 1999 developrnent plans,site • .ns,and definitions PL N/A Ord. 731 &Ord.480-EE,Sexually-oriented businesses February 2, 1999 All 2.71 Impact fee update PW 2 Drainage Master Plan Phase I: Inventory and data assembly Phase II: West Jones Branch Study Area Phase III: South Fork Kirkwood Branch Study Area Phase IV:Dove Creek study Area PS/ED NA Landscape Ordinance Revisions Estimated June, 1999 SCS 4.43 Park Dedication Ordinance-Fee Justification Study April 6, 1999 PS N/A Excavation Ordinance#693-A February 16, 1999 PL 3.0 Sexually Oriented Business Ord.No.731 February 2, 1999 PL/PS N/A Sign Ordinance Revisions(Ord.No.704-A) December 1, 1998 CMO 3.43 Smoking Ordinance November 17, 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance 480-BB:Impervious Coverage October 20, 1998 PS 3.71 Health and Sanitation Ordinance October 20, 1998 PR 1.57 Land Acquisition Plan for Ultimate Build-out of Park System September 28, 1998 PR 1.25 Update of Parks and Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Presented to SPDC and Pk Board joint Meeting September 28, 1998 PL 2.43 Zoning Ordinance Revision:Ordinance 704 September 1, 1998 PL/PS 1.57 Zoning Ordinance 480-CC:Residential Adjacency Standards July 21, 1998 (Neighboring Preservation Ord.)(also addressed parking issue) PL 1.00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update January 20, 1998 PL 2.33 Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A " December 16, 1997 PL/CS 2.50 Sidewalk Ordinance December 16, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-Z(Service Station Regulation) August 19, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-Y(Personal Care Facilities) July 1, 1997 PL 2.00 Subdivision Ordinance—Park Dedication Provisions July 1, 1997 PL 2.67 Subdivision Ord. Thoroughfare References&Misc. June 17, 1997 CMO 3 Ordinance Codification(Administration portion) March 14, 1997 PL 1.00 Master Thoroughfare Plan Update March 4, 1997 PL 1.67 Zoning Ord.480-W(Telecommunication Towers&Antennas) February 4, 1997 PL N/A Zoning Ord.480-X(Revisions to PUD density calculations) February 4, 1997, PR 1.75 Master Plan for Bob Jones Park November 19, 1996 40BLD N/A Grading(Earth Moving)Ordinance PR 2.00 Master Plan for Bicentennial Park November 19, 1996 Master Schedule- City Council Project Priorities Draft:June 12,2000 6:34 PM Page 4 of 4 t City of Southlake, Texas June 22, 2000 DRC Meeting litSUBMITTALS CASE DESCRIPTION 99-140 SITE PLAN 114 Hillside Square (formerly 114 Kimball Square Retail Center) Location: On the northwest corner of the intersection of Northwest Highway (S.H. 114) and Shady Lane Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Owner and Applicant: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. ZA00-056 REZONING/CONCEPT PLAN High Point Estates Location: On the west side of Shady Oaks across from Love Henry Court Current Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District Owner/Applicant: Ross Owens NEW SUBMITTALS CASE DESCRIPTION 00-073 SITE PLAN Consultants in Radiology, PA Location: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), approximately 500' west of Miron Drive Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses Applicant: Carter& Burgess Owner: Harris Methodist HEB ZA00-074 SITE PLAN The Children's Courtyard Day Care Location: On the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of North Peytonville Avenue and Corporate Circle Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Applicant: Wood-Stovall Architects Owner: Realtex Ventures, Inc. ZA00-076 FINAL PLAT Gateway Plaza, Ph. II, Unit 1 Location: On the south side of S.H. 114 approximately 1,200' east of Kimball Avenue Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and automobile accessories 1111 Owner/Applicant: Wyndham Properties, Ltd. City of Southlake, Texas I ZA00-077 FINAL PLAT • Lot 1, Block 1, McAdams Addition Location: 4001 T. W. King Road, being on the east side of T. W. King Road approximately 1,200' south of West Bob Jones Road. Current Zoning: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential Applicant: Linnie McAdams Owner: Linnie Johnson ZA00-078 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (installation of a sun screen) Mirage Car Wash Location: 955 Davis Boulevard (FM 1938), being on the east side of Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) approximately 200' south of Greenbriar Drive Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Owner/Applicant: Mirage Car Wash ZA00-079 SITE PLAN Lot 5R2, Thomas Easter No. 474 Addition Location: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard(FM 1709), approximately 450' east of Crooked Lane Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and limited "I-1"Light Industrial District Uses Owner/Applicant: Lakewood Inc. • • e i PROJECT 2190100 RAYMOND TURCO & ASSOCIATES May 23, 2000 MY NAME IS AND I'M WITH THE SUNRAY RESEARCH GROUP. OUR SURVEY THIS EVENING IS ABOUT RECREATION IN YOUR COMMUNITY. I WAS WONDERING IF I COULD TAKE A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME TO ASK YOU A FEW QUESTIONS? '0%.* AREA AREA I 1 W AREA II 2 AREA III 3 SEX MALE 1 CA FEMALE 2 1. THESE FIRST FEW QUESTIONS ARE TO GATHER DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION. HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR CURRENT RESIDENCE? LESS THAN ONE YEAR . . 1 1 - 3 YEARS 2 3 - 5 YEARS 3 5 - 7 YEARS 4 OVER 7 YEARS 5 REFUSE TO ANSWER . . 6 2. AND WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING AGE CATEGORIES DO YOU BELONG? UNDER 25 1 26 - 35 YEARS . . . 2 36 - 45 YEARS . . . 3 46 - 55 YEARS . . . 4 56 - 65 YEARS . . . 5 OVER 65 YEARS . . . 6 REFUSE TO ANSWER . . 7 3. DO YOU HAVE ANY CHILDREN, LIVING IN YOUR HOME, UNDER THE AGE OF 18? (IF YES: OF THOSE, ARE ANY . . . .) NO CHILDREN 1 AGE 3 OR UNDER . . . 2 (CIRCLE ALL THAT APPLY) AGE 4 - 6 3 AGE 7 - 9 4 AGE 10 - 12 5 AGE 13 - 15 6 AGE 16 - 18 7 (DO NOT READ) REFUSED 8 4. PLEASE TELL ME IF YOU RECALL VOTING IN THE FOLLOWING ELECTIONS? YES NO DON'T REMEMBER A) 2000 CITY COUNCIL 1 2 3 B) 1999 CITY COUNCIL 1 2 3 C) A 1999 SCHOOL BOND ELECTION 1 2 3 5. PLEASE TELL ME HOW SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED YOU ARE WITH RECREATIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FOR PEOPLE IN THE FOLLOWING AGE GROUPS . . VS S D VD NO A) YOUNG CHILDREN (UNDER AGE 6) 1 2 3 4 5 B) CHILDREN, AGES 7 - 12 1 2 3 4 5 C) CHILDREN, AGES 13 - 18 1 2 3 4 5 D) ADULTS, AGES 19 - 45 1 2 3 4 5 E) ADULTS, AGES 46 - 65 1 2 3 4 5 F) ADULTS OVER THE AGE OF 65 1 2 3 4 5 6. WHAT ONE RECREATIONAL FACILITY WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO IMPROVE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES? 7. THE CITY IS PLANNING TO CONSTRUCT AN INDOOR RECREATION CENTER IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS. HOW NECESSARY OR UNNECESSARY DO YOU BELIEVE IT IS FOR THE CITY TO CONSTRUCT AN INDOOR RECREATION CENTER FOR CITY RESIDENTS? VERY NECESSARY . . . 1 NECESSARY 2 UNNECESSARY 3 VERY UNNECESSARY . . 4 NO OPINION 5 8. WHERE DO YOU CURRENTLY GO FOR YOUR INDOOR RECREATION NEEDS? CHURCH FACILITIES . 1 SCHOOLS 2 CIRCLE ALL THAT APPLY PRIVATE CLUBS . . . 3 CITY FACILITIES . . 4 • REFUSE TO. ANSWER . . 5 r 9. AND HAVE YOU EVER VISITED A CITY-OWNED RECREATION CENTER IN ANOTHER CITY? YES 1 (IF YES, ASK #10, ALL OTHERS NO 2 SKIP TO #11) DON'T REMEMBER . . . 3 REFUSE TO ANSWER . 4 10. IN TERMS OF PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES, WHAT DID YOU LIKE MOST ABOUT THE RECREATION CENTER YOU VISITED? 11. PLEASE NAME THREE ACTIVITIES THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN AT THE NEW CENTER. A. B. C. 12. NOW, LET ME NOW READ YOU A LIST OF SOME ACTIVITIES. PLEASE TELL ME HOW LIKELY OR UNLIKELY YOU OR A MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY WOULD BE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE ACTIVITIES AT A NEW RECREATION CENTER . . . . VL L U VU NO A) INDOOR BASKETBALL 1 2 3 4 5 B) JOGGING/WALKING AROUND ON AN INDOOR 1 2 3 4 5 TRACK C) FITNESS OR AEROBICS 1 2 3 4 5 D) LIFTING WEIGHTS/CARDIO EQUIPMENT 1 2 3 4 5 E) PARTICIPATING IN RECREATIONAL CLASSES 1 2 3 4 5 F) INDOOR VOLLEYBALL 1 2 3 4 5 G) DANCING LESSONS 1 2 3 4 5 H) ACTIVITIES GEARED TOWARDS TEENS 1 2 3 4 5 I) IN-LINE OR ROLLERBLADE SKATING 1 2 3 4 5 J) RACQUETBALL 1 2 3 4 5 K) PARTICIPATING IN ARTS & CRAFT CLASSES 1 2 3 4 5 L) ATTENDING COMMUNITY MEETINGS 1 2 3 4 5 M) TAKING COMPUTER TRAINING OR LAB 1 2 3 4 5 N) ACTIVITIES GEARED TOWARDS SENIOR 1 2 3 4 5 CITIZENS 0) GYMNASTICS 1 2 3 4 5 P) SWIMMING 1 2 3 4 5 Q) KARATE 1 2 3 4 5 R) COMMUNITY THEATER/DRAMA 1 2 3 4 5 5) ROCK CLIMBING 1 2 3 4 5 T) KITCHEN/COOKING CLASSES 1 2 3 4 5 13. AS I READ THE RESPONSES TO THE PREVIOUS QUESTION AGAIN, PLEASE TELL ME WHICH ACTIVITY YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY PARTICIPATE IN AS WELL AS WHICH ONE YOU WOULD LEAST LIKELY PARTICIPATE? (PRINT LETTER OF SPORT) A. MOST LIKELY B. LEAST LIKELY 14. HOW STRONGLY WOULD -YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BEING INCLUDED IN A RECREATION CENTER . . . . SS S 0 SO NO A) BASKETBALL COURTS 1 2 3 4 5 B) RACQUETBALL COURTS 1 2 3 4 5 C) SAUNA/STEAM ROOMS 1 2 3 4 5 D) COMPUTER LABS 1 2 3 4 5 E) LEISURE POOL 1 2 3 4 5 F) WEIGHT/CARDIOVASCULAR ROOM 1 2 3 4 5 G) MEETING ROOMS 1 2 3 4 5 H) EXERCISE/AEROBICS ROOM 1 2 3 4 5 I) SPACE FOR SENIOR ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 J) INDOOR JOGGING TRACK 1 2 3 4 5 K) KITCHEN/SNACK BAR 1 2 3 4 5 L) DAYCARE/NURSERY 1 2 3 4 5 M) GAMEROOM, WITH POOL TABLES, 1 2 3 4 5 TABLE TENNIS, ETC. N) EXERCISE/LAP POOL 1 2 3 4 5 0) SPACE FOR TEEN ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 P) KARATE ROOM 1 2 •3 4 5 Q) GYMNASTICS ROOM 1 2 3 4 5 R) COMMUNITY THEATER/DRAMA 1 2 3 4 5 S) ROCK CLIMBING WALL 1 2 3 4 5 T) STAGE AREA FOR CONCERTS 1 2 3 4 5 15. WHAT TYPE OF ACTIVITIES AT THE NEW RECREATION CENTER DO YOU THINK THE CITY SHOULD OFFER THAT WOULD ENCOURAGE MORE PARTICIPATION FROM OLDER RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY? A. B. 16. AND WHAT TYPE OF RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE OFFERED TO YOUTH AT THE NEW RECREATION CENTER? A. B. 17. THE CITY IS ALSO STUDYING THE POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION OF A "TEEN CENTER" FOR YOUTH IN THE COMMUNITY. HOW FAMILIAR OR UNFAMILIAR WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE WITH THE "TEEN CENTER" PROJECT? VERY FAMILIAR . . . 1 FAMILIAR 2 UNFAMILIAR 3 VERY UNFAMILIAR . . 4 NO OPINION 5 18. MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT IDEAS OF JUST WHAT A "TEEN CENTER" IS. IF A FRIEND IN A NEIGHBORING CITY ASKED YOU TO EXPLAIN WHAT A TEEN CENTER IS, HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT? 19. WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOUR CONCEPT OF A TEEN CENTER EMPHASIZES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES, SOCIAL ACTIVITIES OR BOTH? ATHLETIC 1 SOCIAL 2 BOTH 3 REFUSE TO ANSWER . . 4 20. WHAT ONE OR TWO THINGS WOULD YOU EXPECT TO BE INCLUDED IN A "TEEN CENTER"? 1. 2. 21. HOW NECESSARY OR UNNECESSARY DO YOU BELIEVE A "TEEN CENTER" IS FOR THE YOUTH OF SOUTHLAKE? VERY NECESSARY . . . 1 NECESSARY 2 UNNECESSARY 3 VERY UNNECESSARY . . 4 NO OPINION 5 22. LET ME READ YOU SOME STATEMENTS ABOUT A POTENTIAL "TEEN CENTER". AS I READ EACH, TELL ME HOW STRONGLY YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH EACH. A TEEN CENTER . . . . SA A D SD NO A) WOULD BE A GOOD PLACE FOR YOUTH TO BE ABLE 1 2 3 4 5 TO GATHER FOR SOCIAL ACTIVITIES B) IS NOT A GOOD IDEA, BECAUSE MOST TEENS IN 1 2 3 4 5 SOUTHLAKE WOULD NOT EVEN USE THE FACILITY C) WOULD BE A GOOD PLACE FOR YOUTH TO BE ABLE 1 2 3 4 5 TO GATHER FOR ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES D) WOULD CREATE SAFETY CONCERNS IF IT WERE 1 2 3 4 5 CONSTRUCTED IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE OF POTENTIALLY LARGE GATHERINGS OF YOUTH E) IS NOT NECESSARY BECAUSE WE WILL HAVE 1 2 3 4 5 SUFFICIENT RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WHEN THE REC CENTER IS OPENED F) IS NECESSARY BECAUSE THERE CURRENTLY ARE NO 1 2 3 4 5 FACILITIES WHERE JUST TEENS CAN GATHER G) WOULD BE A GOOD TOOL WHEN ENCOURAGING 1 2 3 4 5 FAMILIES TO MOVE TO SOUTHLAKE 23. IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT A TEEN CENTER BE GEARED TOWARDS NONATHLETIC ACTIVITIES SUCH AS DANCES, KARAOKE NIGHTS, COMEDY NIGHTS, CLASSES AND MEETINGS. HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE A TEEN CENTER IN SOUTHLAKE THAT DID NOT INCLUDE ATHLETIC FACILITIES? STRONGLY SUPPORT . 1 SUPPORT 2 OPPOSE 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE . . 4 NO OPINION . . . . 5 24. IF A TEEN CENTER WERE CONSTRUCTED, WOULD THESE ISSUES BE OF MAJOR CONCERN TO YOU, MINOR CONCERN, OR OF NO CONCERN? MAJOR MINOR NO C NO A) SAFETY TO YOUTH AT THE FACILITY 1 2 3 4 B) VANDALISM TO THE PROPERTY 1 2 3 4 C) LOUD NOISE 1 2 3 4 D) LOITERING IN THE AREA 1 2 3 4 E) LACK OF SUPERVISION 1 2 3 4 F) HAVING BOYS AND GIRLS OF DIFFERENT AGES 1 2 3 4 TOGETHER 25. HOW STRONGLY DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS. THE NEEDS OF THE YOUTH OF SOUTHLAKE WOULD BE BEST MET . . . . SA A D SD NO A) BY A TEEN CENTER CONSTRUCTED AS A STAND-ALONE 1 2 3 4 5 FACILITY B) BY TEEN ACTIVITIES AS PART OF THE RECREATION 1 2 3 4 5 CENTER, BUT WITH A SEPARATE ENTRANCE C) BY TEEN ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN A DESIGNATED 1 2 3 4 5 AREA OR ON A DESIGNATED EVENING AT THE RECREATION CENTER D) THE NEEDS OF YOUTH ARE BEING ADDRESSED NOW 1 2 3 4 5 26. AND HOW IMPORTANT OR UNIMPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY IT IS TO BEGIN IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OF A TEEN CENTER? IS IT . . . . VERY IMPORTANT . . . 1 IMPORTANT 2 UNIMPORTANT 3 VERY UNIMPORTANT . . 4 NO OPINION 5 27. A PROPOSED TEEN ACTIVITY CENTER, AT AN ESTIMATED SIZE OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET, COULD COST APPROXIMATELY $1 MILLION. HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS CENTER, BASED ON THE ESTIMATED COST? STRONGLY SUPPORT . 1 SUPPORT 2 OPPOSE 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE . . 4 NO OPINION 5 28. IF $1 MILLION IS APPROPRIATED TO CONSTRUCT A TEEN CENTER, THE RECREATION CENTER CONSTRUCTION MAY HAVE TO BE DELAYED A FEW YEARS. HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TEEN CENTER, BASED ON THIS INFORMATION? STRONGLY SUPPORT . 1 SUPPORT 2 OPPOSE 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE . . 4 NO OPINION 5 29. REGARDING THE TEEN CENTER AND RECREATION CENTER PROJECTS, WHICH WOULD BE YOUR PREFERRED CHOICE. STAND-ALONE TEEN CENTER . . 1 TEEN CENTER AS PART OF, BUT SEPARATE FROM REC CNTR . . 2 REC CNTR THAT INCLUDES TEEN CENTER ACTIVITIES . . 3 A RECREATION CENTER ONLY 4 NO RECREATION CENTER OR TEEN CENTER 5 NO OPINION 6 30. IF IT BECAME NECESSARY TO CHARGE RESIDENTS A MONTHLY FEE FOR OPERATIONAL COSTS AT THE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY, HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE PAYING EACH MONTH FOR UNLIMITED USE. . . . VL L U VU NO A) UNDER $20.00 1 2 3 4 5 B) $20.00 - $25.00 1 2 3 4 5 C) $25.00 - $30.00 1 2 3 4 5 D) MORE THAN $30.00 1 2 3 4 5 31. AND WHAT ABOUT A FAMILY OF FOUR. HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE PAYING EACH MONTH FOR UNLIMITED USE OF THE INDOOR RECREATION CENTER . . . . VL L U VU NO A) UNDER $30.00 1 2 3 4 5 B) $30.00 - $40.00 1 2 3 4 5 C) $40.00 - $50.00 1 2 3 4 5 D) MORE THAN $50.00 1 2 3 4 5 THAT'S THE END OF OUR SURVEY BUT COULD I CHECK TO SEE IF I DIALED THE CORRECT NUMBER. I DIALED . AND COULD I HAVE YOUR FIRST NAME, ONLY IN CASE MY SUPERVISOR HAS TO VERIFY THIS INTERVIEW? THANK YOU AND HAVE A NICE EVENING. CALLER INI SHEET # LENGTH OF SURVEY MAY 23, 2000 DRAFT 2000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE YOUTH RECREATION SURVEY TEEN SURVEY 1. Are you... ,Male female 2. Do you live in the city of Southlake? ,Yes 2No 3. What grade are you in? ,7th 28th 39th 410th 511th 612th 4. How long has your family lived at its current address? ,Less than 1 year 21-3 years ,4-6 years 4 7-10 years Over 10 years 5. When you want to get together with kids your own age, where do you generally go? 6. What would you say was the most popular hangout for kids in your area? 7. Why do you think people gather there? 8. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the recreational services provided for people between the ages of 13 and 18 in the City of Southlake? ,Very Satisfied 2Satisfied ,Dissatisfied ,Very Dissatisfied 9. What one recreational facility would you like to see constructed by the City of Southlake to improve recreational opportunities in the city? 10. If a friend in a neighboring city asked you to explain what a "Teen Center" is, how would you describe it? 11. Would you say that your concept of a Teen Center emphasizes athletic activities, social activities or both ,Athletic ,Social ,Both 12. What one or two things would you expect to be included in a "Teen Center?" 1. 2. 13. How necessary or unnecessary do you believe a "Teen Center" is for young adults in Southlake? ,Very Necessary 2Necessary ,Unnecessary ,Very Unnecessary 14. Below is a series of statements about a potential "Teen Center". How strongly do you agree or disagree with each. Please check 1StrongTy agree, 2Agree, 3Disagree, 4Strongly disagree. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. \\SLKSV2001\Local\Parks&Recreation\RECREATN\TEENCENT\teen surveyl.doc May 26,2000 The"Teen Center" . . . would be a good place for youth to be able to gather for social activities 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 is not a good idea, because most teens in Southlake would not even use the facility 1.00 200 3.00 400 computers C. would be a good place for youth to be able to gather for athletic activities 1 00 2.00 3.00 4.00 D. would create safety concerns if it were constructed in my neighborhood because of 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 potentially large gatherings of youth E. is not necessary because we already have sufficient recreational facilities 1.00 2.00 3.00 400 F. is necessary because there currently are no facilitiies where just teens can gather 1.00 200 3 00 4.00 computers G. would be a good tool when encouraging families to move to Southlake 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 15. Check the box that best describes how strongly you would support or oppose the city constructing a "Teen Center", if it contained the following items. Please check 1Strongly support, 2Support, 3Oppose, 4Strongly oppose. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. A. Basketball courts 1.00 2.00 300 400 B. Stage area for concerts 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 C. Coffee shop-like area 1.00 2.00 300 400 D. Pool/billiard tables 1.00 2.00 3.00 400 E. Swimming pool 200 300 4.00 Weight/cardiovascular room 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 3. Meeting rooms for programs 1.00 2.00 300 4.00 H. Exercise/aerobics room 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 I. Casual area, including big screen televisions and couches 1.00 2.00 3 00 4.00 J. Magazine/reading rooms 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 K. Kitchen/dining area 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 • 16. It has been suggested that a "Teen Center" be geared towards nonathletic activities, such as dances,.Jcaraoke nights, comedy nights, classes and meetings. How strongly would you support or oppose a "Teen Center" in Southlake that did not include athletic facilities? ,Strongly support 2Support ,Oppose 4Strongly oppose 17. Check the box that best indicates how likely or unlikely you would be to participate in any of the following activities if they were held at the "Teen Center". Please check 1Very likely, 2Likely, 3Unlikely, 4Very unlikely. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. A. Karaoke night 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 B. Youth basketball leagues1.00 200 3.00 C. Concerts 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 D. Teen forums or speakers 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 7. Dances/guest DJ nights 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Movies nights on big screen television 100 2.00 3.00 400 G. Pool tables/ping pong tables 200 3 00 4.00 H. Computer labs 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 I. Special interest classes, like taebeo and swing dancing 1 00 2.00 3.00 4.00 J. Group meetings 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 \\SLKSV2001\Local\Parks&Recreation\RECREATN\TEENCENT\teen surveyl.doc May 26,2000 K. Racquetball courts 100 200 300 400 L. Sand volleyball 100 200 300 400 18. How strongly do you agree or disagree with this statement: "A teen center is not necessary because the youth of the ;ommunity can use a recreation center for their needs." ,Strongly agree 2Agree ,Disagree ,Strongly disagree 19. If a "Teen Center"were constructed, please check the box that best describes if each of the following situations would be a major concern to you, a minor concern or no concern. Please check 1Major concern, 2Minor concern, or 3No concern. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. A. Safety to youth at the facility 100 200 300 B. Vandalism to the property 100200 300 s C. Loud noise 1.00 200 300 D. Loitering in the area 100 200 300 E. Lack of supervision 100 200 300 F. Inability for all age groups to participate together 100 200 300 20. Check the box that best describes how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements. Please check 1Strongly agree, 2Agree,,Disagree, 4Strongly disagree. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. A "Teen Center". . . . A. should be constructed as a stand-alone facility 100 200 300 400 B. should be constructed separately, but adjoined to part of a recreation center 100 200 300 400 C. should be constructed in a designated area in a recreation center 100 200 300 400 D. should not be constructed 100 200 300 400 21. Regarding Question #27, what would be your preferred choice? ,Stand-alone facility ,Designated area in recreation center 2Adjoined to recreation center ,Not constructed 22. How strongly do you agree or disagree with this statement: "If the city council decides to not construct a"Teen Center", the needs of the youth in this community are not being met." ,Strongly agree 2Agree ,Disagree ,Strongly disagree 23. The City is also studying the possible construction of a recreation center. Currently, where do you go for your indoor recreation needs? ,Church facilities ,Private clubs (Ballys,etc.) ,Your house/friends house 2Schools ,City facilities ,Nowhere 24. Have you ever visited a recreation center in another city? ,Yes 2No 24a. If yes: In terms of programs or activities,what did you like most about the recreation center you visited? \\SLKSV2001\Local\Parks&Recreation\RECREATN\TEENCENT\teen surveyl.doc May 26,2000 25. Write down three activities that you would like to be able to participate in at a recreation center. 1. 2. 3. 26. Below are listed some activities people could participate in at a recreation center. Check the box that best indicates how likely or unlikely you would be to participate in each. Please check .7Very likely, 2Likely, 3Unlikely, 4Very unlikely. If you don't have an opinion, don't mark any box. A. Indoor basketball 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 B. Jogging/walking around on an indoor track 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 C. Fitness or aerobics 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 D. Lifting weights/cardio vascular equipment 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 E. Participating in recreational classes 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 F. Dancing lessons 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 G. Activities geared towards teens ,oo 2.00 aoo 4.00 H. In-line or rollerblade skating 1.00 2,00 3.00 4.00 I. Racquetball 1.00 2.00 aoo 4.00 J. Participating in arts and craft classes 100 2.00 3.00 400 K. Attending community meetings 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 L. Taking comptuer training or lab 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 M. Gymnastics 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 -J. Swimming 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 )). Karate 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 P. Community theater/drama 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Q. Rock climbing ,.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 R. Kitchen/cooking classes 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 27. From the list of activities in Question#26, write down the letter of the activity you would most likely participate in , as well as in which one you would least likely participate. A. Most likely B. Least likely 28. How strongly would you support or oppose the following being included in a recreation center. For each item, check ,Strongly support, ,Support, ,Oppose, ,Strongly oppose. If you don't have an opinion, leave the question blank and don't mark a box. A. Basketball courts 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 B. Racquetball courts 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 C. Sauna/steam rooms 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 D. Computer labs 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 E. Leisure pool 1.00 2.00 300 4.00 F. Weight/cardiovascular room 1.00 2.00 300 ,400 G. Meeting rooms 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 H. Exercise/aerobics room - 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 . Space for senior activities ,00 2 00 3.00 4.00 I. Indoor jogging track 1.00 z 00 3 00 4.00 K. Kitchen/snack bar 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 L. Daycare/nursery 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 M. Gameroom, with pool tables, table tennis, etc. 1.00 2.00 3.00 400 N. Exercise/lap pool 1.00 2 00 3.00 4.00, \\SLKSV2001\Local\Parks&Recreation\RECREATN\TEENCENT\teen surveyl.doc May 26,2000 O. Space for teen activities ,00 2.00 3.00 4.00 P. Karate room 100 200 3.00 4.00 Q. Gymnastics room 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 R. Community theater/drama 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 S. Rock climbing wall 1.00 2.00 300 4.00 E. Stage area for concerts 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 29. If a recreation center were constructed, how likely or unlikely would you or your family be to use it for recreational activities? ,Very likely 2Likely 3Unlikely SVery unlikely 30. Write down two types of recreational programs you would like to see offered to youth at the new recreation center? A. B. Thank you very much for your cooperation. \\SLKSV2001\Local\Parks&Recreation\RECREATN\TEENCENT\teen surveyl.doc May 26,2000 City of Southlake, Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: June 20,2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers in City Hall WORK SESSION: 5:00 to 5:45 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session. REGULAR SESSION: 5:45 P.M. or Immediately Following the Work Session AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.086. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held, under these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 3. INVOCATION: Chaplain of the Month, Dr. Mike Beaugh, Southlake Presbyterian Church 4. REPORTS: A. Mayor's Report B. City Manager's Report C. SPIN Report D. Parks and Recreation Board Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20, 2000 Page 2 5. Consent: A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held June 6, 2000. B. Resolution No. 00-63, Amending the Employee Handbook to include the "Family Medical Leave"policy. (LS) C. Approval of a professional service agreement with Belcheff& Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hillside Estates and North Pearson/Pecan Acres Addition. (SP) D. Approval of a professional service agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the engineering and design of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates, and the Timberline/Woodsey Courts Addition. (SP) E. Resolution No. 00-67, Authorizing the Director of Public Safety to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City vehicles. F. Resolution No. 00-51, Changing terms for Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board members. (MB) G. Ordinance No. 784, 1st Reading, Establishing a Municipal Court Technology Fund. Public hearing set for July 18, 2000. (SE) H. Ordinance No. 785, 1st Reading, Providing for an increase in warrant fees. Public hearing set for July 18, 2000. (SE) I. Ordinance No. 480-342, 1st Reading (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. Location: West side of South Peytonville Avenue approximately 300' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Applicant: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. SPIN Neighborhood #16. Public hearing set for July 18, 2000. J. Resolution No. 00-64, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining a permanent utility easement and temporary construction easement for use by the City for the construction of a sanitary sewer line. (SP) City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20,2000 Page 3 111 K. Authorize the Mayor to execute Takeover Agreement for sanitary sewer improvements in Jellico Estates with Amwest Surety Insurance. (CT) L. Authorize the Mayor to execute a developer agreement for Southlake Crossing, Phase II, Block 1, Lots 5 and 6 (Hobby Lobby). (CT) M. Recognize and appoint Recon, Zurka and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum 7. Ordinances, second readings,public hearings, and related items: A. ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D.No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Location: North side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 400' west of South Carroll Avenue. Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & • Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. SPIN Neighborhood #8. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING. (tabled @ 6/6 CC mtg.) B. ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Location: North side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 400' west of South Carroll Avenue. Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with"CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. SPIN Neighborhood#8. (tabled @ 6/6 CC mtg.) C. Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, (ZA 99-078), Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1A and 1A1 situated in the R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres. Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and South Peytonville Avenue. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P- 1" Detailed Site Plan District. Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site • Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham&Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. SPIN Neighborhood #16. PUBLIC HEARING. City of Southlake, Texas - - — Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20, 2000 Page 4 D. ZA 00-045, Site Plan for Costco Wholesale, on property legally described as portions of Tracts 1, 2, 3, & 4, W. E. Mayfield's Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 16.3702 acres. Location: South side of S.H. 114 approximately 1,200' east of Kimball Avenue. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Proposed Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with"C- 3" General Commercial District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and automobile accessories. Applicant: Kimley-Horn and Associates. Owners: Donald E. Vogel, Chung Cheng Hong, Glen Scott Harrell, and Wetzel Family Partnership, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #7. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Resolution No. 00-66, (ZA 00-063), Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption, per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) on property legally described as Lot 2R1, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 7.691 acres. Location: Generally located on the northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; movie theaters; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. Owner: EPIPD- Crossroads Square, L.P. Applicant: Tom Thumb. SPIN Neighborhood #10. PUBLIC HEARING. F. Ordinance No. 781, 2nd Reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25 miles per hour for neighborhood streets in Cambridge Place Addition subdivision. City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20,2000 Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING. G. Ordinance No. 782, 2nd Reading, Authorizing and allowing a buy-back option for specific employees with Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-343, ls`Reading, (ZA 00-047), Rezoning and Site Plan for proposed Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing set for July 18, 2000. B. Ordinance No. 480-344, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-048), Rezoning and Concept Plan for proposed Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #13. Public Hearing set for July 18, 2000. C. ZA 00-049, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition, on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lots 2 and 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20,2000 Page 6 plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.8767 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Proposed Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. Owner and Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #13. D. Ordinance No. 480-345, 1st Reading, (ZA 00-064), Rezoning and Site Plan for Bicentennial Park, on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. Location: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P- 2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. Applicant: Cheatham and Associates. Owner: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #10.Public Hearing set for July 18, 2000. E. ZA 00-055, Plat Revision of Proposed Lots 1R1 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4813, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 10.537 acres. Location: West side of Lonesome Dove Avenue approximately 300' north of East Dove Street. Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District. Owner and Applicant: Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. SPIN Neighborhood #3. F. ZA 99-112, Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza, on property legally described as Tracts 2A1A, 2A2A, 11, and 11E situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract 474, and being approximately 32.6 acres. Location: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709) approximately 650' west of Crooked Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Applicant: Caddy Property Management. Owners: Roger G. Williams; E. C. White; Michael and City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20,2000 Page 7 110 Leah Sathre; Dean Shanklin; and Richard Shanklin. SPIN Neighborhood #6. G. Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, amending Ordinance No. 646, "Parks and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and length of terms. Public hearing set for July 18, 2000. H. Ordinance No. 787, 1 st Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition.Public hearing set for July 18, 2000. 9. Resolutions: A. Resolution No. 00-47, Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tern. (SLG) B. Resolution No. 00-53, Appointments to the Building Board of Appeals. C. Resolution No. 00-54, Appointments to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee. • D. Resolution No. 00-55, Appointments to the Joint Utilization Committee. E. Resolution No. 00-56, Appointments to the Library Board. F. Resolution No. 00-57, Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. G. Resolution No. 00-58, Appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. H. Resolution No. 00-59, Appointments to the Senior Advisory Commission. I. Resolution No. 00-60, Appointments to the Southlake Parks Development Corporation. J. Resolution No. 00-61, Appointment of a Council appointee to the Southlake Library Foundation. K. Resolution No. 00-62, Appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. L. Resolution No. 00-65, Appointment of Council Representative as Liaison to DFW Airport. • 10. Other items for consideration: City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20, 2000 Page 8 • A. Approval of Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc. for the construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court. (SP) B. Award of bid for lighting for Bicentennial Park ballfields #4, #5, and #10 to NEMA 3 Electric. 11. Other items for discussion: A. Ordinance No. 783, Municipal Court of Record. 12. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City • Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday;Ap#016, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texa Government Code, Chapter 5` `�;1 OF Stj ��i, Sandra L. LeGrand — '� l isrri City Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and; ct*`�a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581, extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. • City of Southlake, Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda June 20,2000 Page 9 EXECUTIVE SESSION SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and contemplated litigations, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Carroll/1709 LTD. vs. The Board of Adjustments of the City of Southlake. October 1999. SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City. SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS The City Council may ' deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. SECTION 551.086 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS The City Council may deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. A FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING MAY ONLY BE MADE IN OPEN SESSION. City of Southlake, Texas I REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 22, 2000 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. EXECUTIVE SESSION: If a need arises to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. 1. Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, the Commission may meet in executive session to consult with the City Attorney regarding matters authorized by Section 551.071, including matters posted on this agenda. 2. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on June 8, 2000. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Election of a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman. REGULAR AGENDA: 5. Consider: ZA 00-061, REVISED SITE PLAN FOR KIRBY'S STEAKHOUSE, on property legally described as Lot 9, Block A, Southlake Bank Place, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4546 & 4547, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.00 acres. Location: East of Bank Street, southwest of State Highway 114, and approximately 400' south of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M.1709). Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District. Applicant: Kirby's Steakhouse. Owner: Southlake Investments, L.L.C. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 22,2000 PAGE 2 6. Consider: ZA 00-037, REZONING on property legally described as Tracts 4G1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Location: On the north side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. SPIN Neighborhood #15. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA 00-038, PLAT SHOWING FOR LOTS 9 & 10, J. J. FRESHOUR NO. 521 ADDITION, on property legally described as Tracts 4G 1 and 4H situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 4.0 acres. Location: On the north side of Johnson Road approximately 660' east of North Pearson Lane. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Owners and Applicants: Andrea Huffstutler, Diana Taylor, Laura Cronin, and Elizabeth Blessing. SPIN Neighborhood#15. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA 00-040, REZONING AND REVISED SITE PLAN FOR GEORGETOWN PARK, PHASE III, on property legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. Location: 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard being approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "0-1" Office District. Owner and Applicant: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood#7. Public Hearing. 9. Consider: ZA 00-041, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CARPORT FOR A NON- RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (41) on property legally described as Lot 1R3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.554 acres. Location: 2485 E. Southlake Boulevard being approximately 700' east of South Kimball Avenue and 700' south of East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner and Applicant: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. SPIN Neighborhood #7. Public Hearing. f City of Southlake, Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA NNE 22,2000 PAGE 3 10. Consider: Meeting Adjournment. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, June 16, 2000, at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551`,0ti 1111rru,,,,/f /6144V411441/ �T \ _= 141. .:: : Sandra L. LeGrand ... ;lam%�+ 1. • :r,7 City Secretary '. ` If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a d'lb(�abllOyq}tldl��equires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581, extension 704,and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPR O VED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING 2 COMMISSION MEETING 3 June 8, 2000 4 5 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Mike Sandlin; and Commissioners Michael Boutte, Dennis 6 King, and Pamela Muller. 7 8 COMMISSION ABSENT: Vice-Chairman C.D. Peebles and Commissioner Kenneth Horne. 9 10 CITY STAFF PRESENT: Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney; Bruce Payne, Director of Planning; 11 Charlie Thomas, City Engineer; Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services; Garland Wilson, 12 Director of Public Safety; Ricky Black, Chief of Fire Services; Ben Henry, Park Planning and 13 Construction Superintendent; Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner; Lisa Sudbury, Current 14 Planner; Malcolm Jackson, Chief of Building Services; Angela Turner, Graduate Engineer; and Lori 15 Farwell, Planning Secretary. 16 17 Chairman Sandlin called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. 18 19 There was no Work Session held. 20 21 AGENDA ITEM #2, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 22 Chairman Sandlin opened discussion of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission 23 meeting held on May 18, 2000. 24 25 Motion was made to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held 26 on May 18, 2000, as presented. 27 28 Motion: Boutte 29 Second: Muller 30 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, King, Sandlin 31 Nays: None 32 Approved: 4-0 33 Motion carried. 34 35 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0023) 36 37 AGENDA ITEM #3, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS: 38 Senior Planner Dennis Killough introduced the new Director of Planning, Bruce Payne. Mr. 39 Killough confirmed that there will be a June 22 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 40 41 Chairman Sandlin said Agenda Items #4 and #5 are on the Consent Agenda and will not have a 42 separate discussion unless a Commission member or a citizen requests for them to be removed from 43 the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda. No one requested for these items to be 44 removed from the Consent Agenda. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 1 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 2 AGENDA ITEM #4, ZA 00-058, FINAL PLAT FOR CROWN RIDGE ADDITION, PHASE 1A: 3 AGENDA ITEM #5, ZA 00-059, FINAL PLAT FOR CROWN RIDGE ADDITION, PHASE 1B: 4 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-058 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 5 2000, and ZA 00-059 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000. 6 7 Motion: King 8 Second: Muller 9 Ayes: Muller, King, Boutte, Sandlin 10 Nays: None 11 Approved: 4-0 12 Motion carried. 13 14 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0227) 15 16 Due to a Commissioner's need to leave at 9:00 p.m. and the fact that there would not be a quorum 17 after that time, Chairman Sandlin reordered the agenda items to be heard in the following order: #8, 18 9, 10, 15, 16, 19, 18, 11, and 12. 19 20 Laura Cronin, the applicant for Agenda Item#14 (ZA 00-038), requested to table that item to the 21 June 22 Commission meeting. 22 23 AGENDA ITEM #6, ORDINANCE NO. 480-KK, AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE 24 ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, REGARDING NOISE REGULATIONS IN 25 ORDINANCE NO. 480 TO REMOVE ANY CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 26 ORDINANCE NO. 778; 27 AGENDA ITEM #7, ORDINANCE NO. 778, AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE CODE OF 28 ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BY ADDING ARTICLE III TO DEFINE 29 CERTAIN NOISES TO BE A NUISANCE AND PROHIBIT THEM; 30 AGENDA ITEM #13, ZA 00-037, REZONING; 31 AGENDA ITEM#14,ZA 00-038,PLAT SHOWING FOR LOTS 9 & 10,J.J. FRESHOUR NO. 521 32 ADDITION; 33 AGENDA ITEM#17,ZA 00-060, SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PROPOSED LOT 4, BLOCK 34 1, SABRE GROUP CAMPUS: 35 Motion was made to table Ordinance No. 480-KK and Ordinance No. 778 to the July 20 Planning 36 and Zoning Commission meeting; ZA 00-037 and ZA 00-038 to the June 22 Planning and Zoning 37 Commission meeting; and ZA 00-060 to the July 6 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and 38 to continue the Public Hearings to those dates. 39 40 Motion: Muller 41 Second: King 42 Ayes: King, Boutte, Muller, Sandlin 43 Nays: None 44 Approved: 4-0 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 2 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 Motion carried. 2 3 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0356) 4 5 AGENDA ITEM #8, ZA 00-047, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LOT 3, 6 BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION: 7 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Zoning Change and Site 8 Plan on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of 9 Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat 10 Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an 11 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 12 A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, 13 Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. The property is located on the north side 14 of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. The Current 15 Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Requested 16 Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited 17 to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. The Land Use Category is 18 Retail Commercial. The Owner and Applicant is the City of Southlake. Thirteen(13) written notices 19 were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) written notices 20 were sent to property owners outside the 200' notification area. Two (2) responses were received 21 from outside the 200' notification area with both being in favor. 22 ?3 Garland Wilson (Director of Public Safety) presented this item to the Commission. >>A 25 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 26 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 27 28 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0508) 29 30 Commissioner Muller said it is her understanding that the City owns all of this property and that 31 they are going to sell the middle lot for commercial use. She said she hopes the City will retain that 32 piece of property and reimburse the Crime Control District because they may have a further use for 33 it. She thinks the commercial in the middle is distracting from the site and the safety of emergency 34 vehicles coming in and out. She said she is not keen on granting driveway variances, but in this 35 case, there is a pre-existing condition that is preventing the appropriate spacing. She also hopes that 36 in the future they consider punching out a connection to the gas station lot and that possibly the gas 37 station will go away and a better use will be put on this corner for better traffic safety. 38 39 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-047 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 40 2, 2000, and to delete Items #1.a (500' driveway spacing on F.M. 1709) and #1.b (250' driveway 41 spacing on Randol Mill Avenue). 42 43 Motion: Muller 44 Second: King Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 3 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, King, Sandlin 2 Nays: None 3 Approved: 4-0 4 Motion carried. 5 6 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0595) 7 8 AGENDA ITEM#9,ZA 00-048, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR PROPOSED LOT 2R, 9 BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION: 10 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Zoning Change and 11 Concept Plan on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an 12 addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 13 A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, 14 Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres. The property is located on the north side 15 of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. The Current 16 Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Requested 17 Zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Land Use Category is Retail Commercial. 18 The Owner and Applicant is the City of Southlake. Five (5) written notices were sent to property 19 owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) written notices were sent to property 20 owners outside the 200' notification area. One (1) response was received from outside the 200' 21 notification area and was in favor. 22 23 Commissioner Boutte asked why this property is being rezoned at this time and asked if the City has 24 a potential buyer. 25 26 Garland Wilson (Director of Public Safety) said there is not a potential buyer at this time. 27 28 Senior Planner Dennis Killough said the southeast portion of the proposed lot is already zoned"C-2" 29 and the remainder is zoned "AG"; in order to plat this property, zoning must be in place on all of 30 it. 31 32 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 33 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 34 35 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0723) 36 37 Commissioner Muller asked what the bufferyard requirement would be if this lot were zoned"CS". 38 Mr. Killough said there would be no bufferyard requirement between two "CS"zoned properties. 39 40 Commissioner Muller said her concern is changing the zoning of this property to "C-2". She thinks 41 the City should retain this property and said they could certainly bring up this zoning request again 42 in the future. 43 44 Chairman Sandlin said the Commission could certainly approve "CS" zoning instead of"C-2" Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 4 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 zoning because it would be considered down-zoning. 2 3 Mr. Killough said"CS"zoning is not cumulative with the "C-2"zoning. He said there are only a few 4 "CS"uses that can be placed in a"C-2" zoning district without changing the zoning. He said they 5 would have to pull this application, readvertise it, and bring another zoning request before the 6 Commission in order to change it to a "CS" zoning district. 7 8 Chairman Sandlin asked if"0-1" zoning is cumulative, and Mr. Killough said yes. 9 10 Commissioner Boutte asked staff to clarify the Commission's options and what zoning categories 11 would be allowable without readvertising. Commissioner Muller said they could approve "C-1" or 12 "0-1". 13 14 Commissioner Boutte asked what harm it would do to readvertise this. Director Wilson said it would 15 throw their programming off and their projected date of opening the west facility. He said they are 16 in critical need of getting their response times down. Director Wilson said in order for them to 17 market the property, they need the "C-2" zoning. 18 19 Commissioner Boutte said he really likes the idea of not putting "C-2" zoning on this property, 20 especially with it being City-owned property. He said he does not want it sold to a developer and 21 then find out that he wants to put something on it that the residents do not like and then the City has 22 done itself a disservice. 23 24 Director Wilson said staff has committed to working with the residents and said they have a unique 25 relationship with them in this project. He said if it is zoned"C-2" and is coming forward with a Site 26 Plan, it will be something of their liking. He said it would have to come through P&Z and City 27 Council before they have an approved site to build on. 28 29 Commissioner Muller said she thinks the Commission should leave it as "C-2" and maybe these 30 comments will be in the minutes for the Council to consider. 31 32 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-048 subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated 33 June 2, 2000. 34 35 Motion: Muller 36 Second: King 37 38 Commissioner Muller said she is not happy about doing this, but she understands the concerns here 39 and there is still the City Council to consider this. 40 41 Ayes: Muller, King, Sandlin 42 Nays: Boutte 43 Approved: 3-1 44 Motion carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 5 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 2 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #0945) 3 4 AGENDA ITEM#10,ZA 00-049,PLAT REVISION FOR PROPOSED LOTS 2R AND 3, BLOCK 5 1, CORNER ADDITION: 6 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Plat Revision of proposed 7 Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner 8 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded 9 in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lots 2 and 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 10 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded 11 in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, 12 Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.8767 acres. The property is located on the north side 13 of West Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. The Current 14 Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Proposed 15 Zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" 16 Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated 17 outside storage. The Land Use Category is Retail Commercial. The Owner and Applicant is City of 18 Southlake. Fourteen (14) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification 19 area, and no responses were received. 20 21 Garland Wilson (Director of Public Safety) presented this item to the Commission. 22 23 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 24 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 25 26 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1002) 27 28 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-049 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, June 2, 2000. 29 30 Motion: Muller 31 Second: Boutte 32 Ayes: King, Boutte, Muller, Sandlin 33 Nays: None 34 Approved: 4-0 35 Motion carried. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1016) 38 39 AGENDA ITEM #15, ZA 00-045, SITE PLAN FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE: 40 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Site Plan for Costco 41 Wholesale on property legally described as portions of Tracts 1, 2, 3, & 4, W. E. Mayfield's 42 Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C,Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, 43 Texas, and being approximately 16.3702 acres. The property is located on the south side of S.H. 44 114 approximately 1,200' east of Kimball Avenue. The Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. The Proposed Zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan 2 District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, 3 batteries, and automobile accessories. The Land Use Category is Mixed Use. The Owners of the 4 property are Donald E. Vogel, Chung Cheng Hong, Glen Scott Harrell, and Wetzel Family 5 Partnership, Ltd. The Applicant is Kimley-Horn and Associates. Thirteen(13) written notices were 6 sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and two (2) responses were received with 7 both being in favor. One (1) response was received from outside the 200' notification area also being 8 in favor. 9 10 Senior Planner Dennis Killough said Staff Comment#1 requires this Site Plan to comply with any 11 recommendations that were put in place with the Concept Plan and Zoning approval by City 12 Council. 13 14 Greg McGahey (AEM& Associates) presented this case to the Commission. 15 16 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 17 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 18 19 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1183) 20 21 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-045, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 22 2, 2000, and subject to the City Council motion for the Concept Plan. 4 Motion: Muller 25 Second: King 26 27 Commissioner King said he abstained from voting when this matter was before the Commission for 28 the Zoning and Concept Plan for all of Gateway Plaza, Phase II, and the applicant was Wyndham 29 Properties. He said that plan included property that is not before the Commission tonight, and he 30 abstained from that item because there was a perceived conflict involving ownership of the other 31 property not before the Commission tonight. He is voting on this item since the applicant is Costco 32 instead of Wyndham Properties. 33 34 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, King, Sandlin 35 Nays: None 36 Approved: 4-0 37 Motion carried. 38 39 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1232) 40 41 AGENDA ITEM #16, ZA 00-055, PLAT REVISION OF PROPOSED LOTS 1R1 & 1R2, BLOCK 42 1, LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION: 43 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Plat Revision of proposed 44 Lots 1R1 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, on property legally described Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 7 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 as Lot 1, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, 2 Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4813, Plat Records, 3 Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 10.537 acres. The property is located on the west 4 side of Lonesome Dove Avenue approximately 300' north of East Dove Street. The Current Zoning 5 is "CS" Community Service District. The Land Use Category is Public/Semi-Public. The Owner and 6 Applicant is Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. Two (2) written notices were sent to property owners 7 within the 200' notification area, and one (1) response was received in favor. 8 9 Coy Quesenbury, 2380 Lonesome Dove, Southlake, Texas, presented this case to the Commission. 10 He said they wanted to borrow money to finance the new building they just built. They have a bank 11 anxious to lend them the money, but the bank would not take the cemetery as collateral so they are 12 requesting that the cemetery be separated out by this plat. 13 14 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 15 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 16 17 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1342) 18 19 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-055 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 20 2000. 21 22 Motion: Boutte 23 Second: Muller 24 Ayes: Muller, King, Boutte, Sandlin 25 Nays: None 26 Approved: 4-0 27 Motion carried. 28 29 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1359) 30 31 AGENDA ITEM #19, ZA 99-112, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EASTER PLAZA: 32 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Preliminary Plat of Easter 33 Plaza on property legally described as Tracts 2A1A, 2A2A, 11, and 1 1E situated in the Thomas 34 Easter Survey, Abstract 474, and being approximately 32.6 acres. The property is located on the 35 south side of East Southlake Boulevard(F. M. 1709) approximately 650'west of Crooked Lane. The 36 Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. The 37 Land Use Category is Low Density Residential and Retail Commercial. The Owners of the property 38 are Roger G. Williams; E. C. White; Michael and Leah Sathre; Dean Shanklin; and Richard 39 Shanklin. The Applicant is Caddy Property Management. Twenty-seven (27) written notices were 40 sent to property owners within the 200' notification area, and four(4) responses were received with 41 two (2) being in favor, one (1) being opposed, and one (1) being from the SPIN Representative. 42 43 F.C. LeVrier(Sun Coast Architects) 2379 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, presented this case 44 to the Commission. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 8 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 2 Commissioner Boutte asked if there are immediate plans for the property. Mr. LeVrier said he is 3 representing Mr. Krugler because he is in Tokyo. He said they have been in touch with each other 4 and have been working with the idea of concept development but it is in such a preliminary stage 5 right now, there is really nothing to show. 6 7 Chairman Sandlin asked Mr. LeVrier to clarify that all he is asking the Commission to do is to 8 approve the Nolen Drive alignment. Mr. LeVrier said all they are asking for is approval of the Nolen 9 Drive alignment and the allocation of the right-of-way. 10 11 Mr. Killough said the whole idea of this was to be in a position for Nolen Drive to be final platted 12 and tied down in its location. He said because it involved so many other tracts, the City had to 13 require that a preliminary plat be involved to address the boundaries of all of these tracts that Nolen 14 Drive would be coming out of. 15 16 Chairman Sandlin asked staff if they think this works out pretty well with the Nolen Drive on the 17 north side of F.M. 1709. City Engineer Charlie Thomas said yes. 18 19 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 20 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 21 22 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #1520) 23 24 Commissioner Boutte asked if the City is picking up any legal obligations to build this road. Mr. 25 Killough said no. 26 27 Motion was made to approve ZA 99-112 subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 28 2000, and to delete Items #1 (proper zoning requirement) and#3.a(5' utility easement). 29 30 Motion: King 31 Second: Muller 32 Ayes: King, Boutte, Muller, Sandlin 33 Nays: None 34 Approved: 4-0 35 Motion carried. 36 37 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section#1974) 38 39 AGENDA ITEM #18, ZA 00-063, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF PACKAGED 40 BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION: 41 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Specific Use Permit for 42 the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 43 (1) on property legally described as Lot 2R1, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City 44 of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 9 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPR O VED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 7.691 acres. The property is 2 generally located on the northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and 3 West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The Current Zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan 4 District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food 5 lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; 6 movie theaters; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges 7 accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or 8 fraternities; medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related 9 facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the 10 hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors; mortuaries, funeral homes and 11 undertakers; skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other comparable 12 establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject 13 to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. The Land 14 Use Category is Retail Commercial. The Owner of the property is EPIPD- Crossroads Square, L.P. 15 The Applicant is Tom Thumb. Nine (9)written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' 16 notification area, and one (1) response was received in favor. 17 18 Ron Yeary, 6780 Abrams Road, Dallas, Texas, presented this case to the Commission. He said Tom 19 Thumb's opening is planned for July 12. 20 21 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 22 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 23 24 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #2066) 25 26 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-063. 27 28 Motion: Muller 29 Second: King 30 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, King, Sandlin 31 Nays: None 32 Approved: 4-0 33 Motion carried. 34 35 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #2142) 36 37 AGENDA ITEM#11, ZA 00-064, REZONING AND SITE PLAN FOR BICENTENNIAL PARK: 38 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Zoning Change and Site 39 Plan on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City 40 of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 41 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B 1, 3C, 42 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being 43 approximately 61.61 acres. The property is located on the north side of West Southlake Boulevard 44 (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. The Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 10 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" 2 Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General 3 Commercial District uses. The Requested Zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" 4 Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage. The Land Use Category is 5 Public Parks/Open Space. The Owner of the property is the City of Southlake. The Applicant is 6 Cheatham and Associates. Thirty-five (35) written notices were sent to property owners within the 7 200' notification area, and five (5) responses were received with three (3) being opposed, one (1) 8 being in favor, and one (1) being undecided. 9 10 Commissioner Boutte stated this is the first item the Commission has seen since the new outside 11 storage ordinance was passed regarding the outside storage of vending machines, and the variance 12 is being requested by the City itself. 13 14 Kevin Hugman (Director of Community Services) presented this item to the Commission. 15 16 Chairman Sandlin asked if there will be time limits on the lights. Director Hugman said yes; the 17 lights are on automatic timers to go out at 10:30 p.m. during the week and at 11:00 p.m. during the 18 weekends. 19 20 Commissioner King asked what the footcandles are for the lights on the tennis courts. Parking 21 Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry said the lights are 50 footcandles. Director 22 Hugman said the lights are still fairly new and will burn in over time to decrease a little. 23 24 Commissioner King asked what the footcandles are for lights on the baseball fields. Mr. Henry said 25 the ratio is 50 footcandles in the infield and 30 footcandles in the outfield, but the fields proposed 26 tonight will have 30 footcandles throughout. 27 28 Commissioner Boutte asked what would have to be done to bring the soft drink machine locations 29 up to ordinance standards. Director Hugman said they would have to be placed inside the buildings 30 and that is not feasible because two of the buildings are restrooms and the other is a concession 31 building and there is not an area to place a machine inside so that is conducive to the public. 32 33 Director Hugman said Coca-Cola has already agreed to not light the soft drink machines and will 34 take the side logos off as well. 35 36 Chairman Sandlin said he does not have a problem with vending machines,but he hates to see more 37 lights in the park; it is already the brightest spot in Southlake. 38 39 Commissioner Boutte said he does not have a problem with vending machines either except that it 40 really bothers him that the first requested variance for a City ordinance comes from the City. 41 42 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. No one in the audience stepped forward to speak. 43 Chairman Sandlin closed the Public Hearing. 44 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 11 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #2645) 2 3 Commissioner Boutte said if the first variance granted on vending machines is for the City, he does 4 not know how the City is going to justify not granting a variance to the next applicant that comes 5 along. 6 7 Commissioner King asked if there are compelling reasons why they need to put in the vending 8 machines. Director Hugman said the contract with Coca-Cola is a$300,000 contract with $100,000 9 the first year plus revenues off of the sales. He said they negotiated the contract and had gotten the 10 contract worked out prior to the change in the ordinance. 11 12 Commissioner King asked if the revenue will be going to the General Revenue Fund. Director 13 Hugman said no, it will go into the Park Fund for projects at Bicentennial Park. 14 15 Commissioner King said that is reason enough for him to go along with this and the fact that this is 16 a public entity and the funds will be used for the park as opposed to a private enterprise. He said the 17 vending machines, per say, do not bother him either. 18 19 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-064 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 20 2, 2000, and: 21 • Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance 22 with existing facility usage agreements; ?3 • Delete Item#2 (vending machine requirements); ?4 • Delete Item#3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping) for existing improvements only; 25 • Delete Item#4 (Residential Adjacency Standards) for existing improvements only; 26 • Machines will not be lit at night; 27 • Allow screening of the machines as proposed. 28 29 Motion: King 30 Second: Muller 31 Ayes: Muller, King 32 Nays: Boutte, Sandlin 33 Vote: 2-2 34 Motion failed. 35 36 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #2964) 37 38 Motion was made to approve ZA 00-064 subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 39 2, 2000, and: 40 • Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance 41 with existing facility usage agreements; 42 • Delete Item#3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping) for existing improvements only; and 43 • Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards) for existing improvements only. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 12 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY P&Z COMMISSION 1 2 Motion: Boutte 3 Second: Muller 4 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, Sandlin 5 Nays: King 6 Approved: 3-1 7 Motion carried. 8 9 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #3045) 10 11 AGENDA ITEM #12, ZA 00-036, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SIMMONS ADDITION: 12 Current Planner Lisa Sudbury presented this item to the Commission for a Preliminary Plat for 13 Simmons Addition on property legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Simmons Addition, an addition 14 to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-181, 15 Page 70, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 20.713 acres. The property 16 is located on the north side of Rainforest Court approximately 700' southeast of the intersection of 17 Rainforest Court and Raintree Drive. The Current Zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential 18 District. The Land Use Category is Low Density Residential and 100 Year Flood Plain. The Owners 19 of the property are John Simmons and Chris and Nanette Lockhart. The Applicant is Mary Meyer's 20 Enterprises, Inc. Twenty (20) written notices were sent to property owners within the 200' 21 notification area, and seven (7) responses were received with five (5) being opposed and two (2) 22 being in favor. Four (4) responses were received from outside the 200' notification area with all 23 being opposed. 24 25 Fred Joyce (Mary Meyer's Enterprises, Inc.) presented this item to the Commission. 26 27 Commissioner Boutte said he heard there was a meeting in which only the residents on Rainforest 28 Court were invited and the residents on Brookwood Court felt left out; he asked Mr. Joyce if they 29 had a reason to feel that way. Mr. Joyce said he requested that they ask everybody, but the lady he 30 was talking to from Rainforest Court declined the request. 31 32 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #3428) 33 34 Chairman Sandlin opened the Public Hearing. 35 36 Joseph Bayer, 2829 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said he is one of the people opposed to the 37 entry from Rainforest Court into the Simmons Addition. He stated his concern for the children on 38 his street with the additional traffic and safety vehicles going up and down the street. He also 39 expressed his concern about the water pressure in his neighborhood and the effect the Simmons 40 Addition would have on that. 41 42 Commissioner Muller asked what size the water lines are in this area. City Engineer Charlie Thomas 43 said they would be tying into an 8" line. 44 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 Commissioner Muller asked if most of the lines in this area have been replaced. Mr. Thomas said 2 most of them have been replaced as far as he knows. 3 4 Commissioner Muller asked if there is any way to improve the water pressure in this area. Mr. 5 Thomas said he does not know of any plan to improve the water pressure. 6 7 Nancy DePue, 2810 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said when she bought her home in 1995, 8 she thought there was a creek behind it; she had no reason to think otherwise. She said she asked her 9 neighbors at that time, and they told her it was always under water. She said one of her major 10 concerns is the possibility of flooding; there is constant standing water. She said if they add more 11 concrete and take away more trees, there will be no where for the water to go and that will change 12 the flood plain as it is presently shown. Regarding the street connection on Rainforest Court, she 13 said there are blind curves from both directions in that area, and it would not be safe to have it there. 14 She said Raintree is also a one-access street, and this would be adding eleven more houses and 15 families to it. 16 17 Stephen Apple, 2819 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said he, too, was opposed to the original 18 plan of the access on Rainforest Court. He said they met with Fred Joyce and said he went to great 19 lengths to try to satisfy the neighbors' concerns, and he complimented Mr. Joyce on that fact. He 20 said they currently have 40 homes on a dead-end street, Raintree, which is narrower than City 21 standards because they tried to preserve some trees. He said more than once they have been blocked 22 in and cannot get out; if they cannot get out, the City cannot get an emergency vehicle in. He said 23 anytime the power lines or water lines are being worked on, they have to wait. He said his second 24 concern is the water pressure. He also questioned whether or not the plans accurately represent the 25 location of the 100-year flood plain. He also expressed his concern for the trees. He said he thinks 26 the plan Mr. Joyce put together is a very good plan, but he wishes he would drop a lot or two but the 27 safety concerns and the water pressure are out of Mr. Joyce's control. 28 29 Commissioner Muller asked Mr. Apple what would be the maximum number of lots he would have 30 if this were his project. Mr. Apple said he would like to see eight total (six new plus the two 31 existing). 32 33 Burton Patterson, 2809 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said he is not opposed to this plan as 34 long as the entrance is not on Rainforest Court. 35 36 Reta Cannella, 2850 Brookwood Lane, Southlake, Texas, stated her concern about the width of the 37 streets in her area. She said Raintree Drive is only 21' wide with a deep barditch on one side and 38 Brookwood Lane is only 18'8" wide. She does not think these streets are adequate thoroughfares 39 for school buses, fire trucks, and large moving trucks. She said she liked the original plan with the 40 entrance on Rainforest Court, but she has concerns about drainage down this street which has a 30' 41 drop. She said she is not in favor of the ingress/egress shown on Brookwood Lane because it is 42 already a substandard street. She questioned what happened to the original plat. 43 44 Marlene Spady, 2860 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said in defense of her neighborhood Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 14 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 meeting with Mr. Joyce, it was not an exclusive act on she and her neighbors' part. They are all 2 mothers and are very busy and do not have everyone's phone numbers. She said it was just a matter 3 of the neighbors having questions, calling Mr. Joyce, and talking to him. She thanked Mr. Joyce for 4 coming and talking to her and her neighbors and said she is sorry for not thinking beyond her little 5 street and inviting more people. She also expressed her concern about the water pressure. 6 7 Martin Peryea, 2820 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, thanked Dennis Killough and Charlie 8 Thomas for coming out and meeting with the residents on Rainforest Court and discussing their 9 concerns. He said Mr. Thomas stated it would be safer for vehicle traffic for the entrance to be on 10 Brookwood Lane. He said there are currently twelve children that live on the Rainforest Court cul- 11 de-sac and ten of those children are under ten years old; he does not feel it would be safe to have the 12 entrance on Rainforest Court. He said when people purchased property on Brookwood Lane, they 13 must have realized that road would eventually go through. He also expressed his concern regarding 14 the minimum house size of 3,000 s.f. for Simmons Addition and asked that it be increased. 15 16 Kim Itzla, 2849 Brookwood Lane, Southlake, Texas, said they actually thought the area beside their 17 house was a driveway and not a street. She said they also have concerns about children; there is a 18 group home for disabled children at the end of their street. She said Mr. Joyce stated earlier that he 19 wanted to invite the residents on Brookwood Lane and that request was declined. 20 21 Mr. Apple said the original plat from 1993 shows that driveway as Redrock Road. 22 23 Ginger Patterson, 2809 Rainforest Court, Southlake, Texas, said she has a contract on a house and 24 said she is very disappointed to find out there are existing water problems and that there will not be 25 a forest by her. 26 27 Chairman Sandlin left the Public Hearing open. 28 29 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #4825) 30 31 Chairman Sandlin said he does not see the Commission resolving this issue tonight. 32 33 Commissioner Muller agreed and said it is unfortunate the neighbors were not brought together to 34 discuss this. She said there are valid concerns about flooding, drainage, road widths, and water 35 pressure. 36 37 Chairman Sandlin said he would not be comfortable with this going through tonight and the 38 Commission not doing their job. He would vote for a motion to deny over any motion to approve 39 at this point. He said the Commission does not have time to work through all of this tonight but said 40 they cannot table it on their own. He thinks it would be in the applicant's best interest to table this 41 and work with the residents. 42 43 Mr. Joyce requested to table to the July 20 meeting. 44 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 15 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BYP&Z COMMISSION 1 Motion was made to table ZA 00-036 at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing 2 to the July 20, 2000, Commission meeting and to waive the 30-day rule. 3 4 Motion: Boutte 5 Second: Muller 6 Ayes: Boutte, Muller, King, Sandlin 7 Nays: None 8 Approved: 4-0 9 Motion carried. 10 11 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section #5308) 12 13 AGENDA ITEM #20, MEETING ADJOURNMENT: 14 Chairman Sandlin adjourned the meeting at 9:06 p.m. on June 8, 2000. 15 16 (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 06-08-00, tape 1, section#5314) 17 18 19 20 23 Mike Sandlin 24 Chairman 25 26 27 ATTEST: 28 29 30 Ji 33 Lori A. Farwell 34 Planning Secretary 35 36 N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MTG\MIN\2000\06-08-00.DOC Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes on June 8, 2000 16 4- 1( UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OFFICIAL CANVASS OF ELECTION 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tern Gary Fawks; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Ronnie Kendall; Councilmember Greg Standerfer. COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Patsy DuPre and Wayne Moffat. CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Billy Campbell; Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton; and, City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand. Agenda Item#1, Call to Order Mayor Rick Stacy called the Special City Council meeting to order at 5:20 p.m., announcing the reason for the special meeting is to officially canvass the vote's cast at the Runoff Election held on June 3, 2000. Agenda Item #2, Resolution No. 00-50, Canvassing The Returns and Declaring the Results of the General Runoff Election held on June 3, 2000. Mayor Stacy read into the record the results of the runoff election for Councilmember Place 2, held on June 3, 2000, noting that there were cast at early voting 572 votes and at said runoff election 1,207 votes were cast for a total votes of 1,779. The Mayor announced that Keith Shankland is hereby declared to have been elected to the Office of Councilmember Place 2, for a term to expire in May 2003. Keith Shankland received a total of 891 votes and Bob Williams received a total of 888 votes. Motion was made to approve Resolution No. 00-50, as presented, declaring Keith Shankland as the new Councilmember Place 2. Motion: Fawks Second: Kendall Ayes: Fawks, Kendall, Standerfer, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 4-0 vote Agenda Item#3, Adjournment Mayor Stacy adjourned the Special meeting at 5:25 p.m. Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 1 of 2 { UNOFFICIAL MINUTES-NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Special City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 2 of 2 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rick Stacy; Mayor Pro Tem Gary Fawks; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Ronnie Kendall. Members: Greg Standerfer; Rex Potter and Keith Shankland [took his place at the Council table after being sworn in]. COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Patsy DuPre. CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Billy Campbell; Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton; Director of Finance Sharen Elam; Director of Economic Development Greg Last; Director of Community Services Kevin Hugman; Public Information Officer James Kunke; Director of Public Works Ron Harper; City Engineer Charlie Thomas; Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe; Assistant to the Director of Public Works Valerie Bradley; Director of Planning Bruce Payne; Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy; Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter; Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson; Manager of Technical Services Johnny Knight; Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson; City Attorney E. Allen Taylor Jr.; and, City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand. WORK SESSION: Mayor Rick Stacy called the work session to order at 5:25 p.m. Councilmembers and staff discussed items on the agenda. The work session was audio and video tape-recorded for future reference. Copies are available by request from the City Secretary. ✓ During the work session, City Council desired to add agenda items #8-B, #10-A, #10-B, #10-C, &#10-D to the consent agenda. The work session ended at 6:10 p.m. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Agenda Item#1-A, Call to Order Mayor Rick Stacy called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:10 p.m. City Council meetings are video and audio tape-recorded for future reference and copies are available upon request from the City Secretary. Agenda Item#2-A,Executive Session Mayor Rick Stacy advised the audience that the City Council would be going into Executive Session pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.086 to seek legal advise from our City Attorney; to deliberate regarding real property matters; to deliberate regarding a prospective gift; to deliberate regarding personnel matters; to deliberate regarding security devices; and/or to deliberate regarding economic development negotiations. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 1 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Council adjourned into executive session at 6:10 p.m. Council returned to open session at 7:00 p.m. Agenda Item#2-B, Action Necessary/Executive Session Motion was made to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract of sale in the amount discussed in executive session for the purchase of right-of-way necessary for intersection improvements at SH 114 and White Chapel Boulevard as part of the Traffic Management Bond Program. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall Nays: None Abstention: Stacy Approved: 4-0-1 votes Motion was made to reject the offer to purchase City property as discussed in executive session. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 5-0 votes Agenda Item#3, Invocation Chaplain of the Month, Dr. Mike Beaugh, Southlake Presbyterian Church gave the invocation. Agenda Item#4-A, Mayor's Report Mayor Stacy made announcements at this time: ✓ City Councilmembers will conduct interviews of the applicants for Boards and Commissions on Monday, June 12, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. in the Administration Building Conference room. ✓ June 15, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the Senior Activity Center, a Joint SPIN and City Council meeting will be held. / 4th of July Celebrations: o Timarron Subdivision will have a parade on Saturday, July 1 at 9:00 a.m. and would like for the Mayor and Councilmembers to be apart of their celebration, as they have in past years. Keep that date in mind and let the City Secretary know if you can attend. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 2 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL o The Independence Day celebration at Town Square will be held on Monday, July 3. There will be a children's parade, Lake Cities Band will provide music, and there will be a firework show in the evening. More information will be coming on this annual event. ✓ The City Council meeting on July 4th has been cancelled for the holiday. City offices will also be closed. Mayor Stacy announced, "Southlake On-Line," the City's official Internet site, has been named the best in its classification statewide by the Texas City Management Association. There were only six winners overall, including Plano, San Marcos, Corpus Christi, College Station and Boerne. Our Public Information Officer James Kunke will be in Galveston this weekend to accept that award and to participate in a panel discussion to help other Texas cities with designing and maintaining Web sites. City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand administered the Oath of Office to newly elected Councilmember Place 2 Keith Shankland. Mayor Stacy stated, "I am very pleased that this election process has ended and I'm excited for the community and I'm looking forward to working with Mr. Shankland." Agenda Item#4-B, City Manager's Report City Manger Billy Campbell stated, for several months Councilmember Rex Potter and city staff have been working with Tarrant County representatives and the Town Hall architect to select a finish schedule for Town Hall. In addition, the Library Board has met to select the finishes relative to the library area. The colors and selections have been made. Most selections were made to give the building a traditional Town Hall look and feel. A copy of the selections made are hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Councilmember Rex Potter said, "We have had a committee that has met every week, if not sooner as we get closed to the finalization of the Town Hall. To be on schedule and within the budget is our goal and that is what the target is. We hope to be completed by the end of October. As we said, we are allowing a month or two because of the holidays and getting the furniture in and getting things set up. The project is moving along beautifully." Director of Public Works Ron Harper thanked Councilmember Potter for investing the time and caring about being at the meetings, some of them have been long. It is amazing how much time has been spent in selecting the colors and fabrics for the Town Hall. Mr. Harper presented the colors and samples of flooring and paints for the building. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 3 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item#4-C, SPIN Report David Baltimore, Senior Representative for SPIN gave the SPIN Report. Mr. Baltimore resides at 1368 Holland Hill, Southlake. He reminded the City Council members of the Joint SPIN and City Council meeting to be held on June 15, at 7:00 p. m. in the Senior Center. He reported on the Trail Master Plan meetings that were held on May 25 for those on the west and north areas of the City. He thanked everyone who participated in those meetings. Agenda Item#5, Consent Agenda Mayor Stacy informed the audience that "Consent" agenda items, which consist of several items, are considered by one vote. He said if anyone in the audience had a request for an item not to be on the consent agenda, that item would be deleted from that portion of the agenda and considered separately. The consent items are as follows: 5-A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on May 16, 2000. 5-B. Ordinance No. 781, 1st Reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25 miles per hour for neighborhood streets in Cambridge Place Addition subdivision. Public hearing set for June 20, 2000. 5-C. Ordinance No. 782, 1st Reading, Authorizing and allowing a buy-back option for specific employees with Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). Public hearing set for June 20, 2000. 5-D. Ordinance No. 480-332, 1st Reading (ZA 99-139), Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square. Tabled at the request of the applicant to July 18, 2000. Public hearing set for August 1, 2000. 5-E. Ordinance No. 480-342, 1st Reading (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. Tabled at the request of the applicant to June 20, 2000, with the public hearing set for July 18, 2000. 8-B. ZA 00-006, Plat Revision for Lot 1R,Block 1, Carroll High School Addition. 10-A. Request for variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A, for the Trailhead, 2260 Johnson Road and 525 North Pearson Lane. 10-B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for CISD No. 4 Addition (Middle/Intermediate School), located on the west side of South Kimball Avenue, approximately 900' south of east Southlake Boulevard. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 4 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 10-C. Award of bid to W.R. Hodgson & Company, Inc. for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements to serve Cross Timber Hills subdivision. 10-D. Approval of Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Pate Brothers Construction, Inc. For the construction of a 14-inch and 18-inch force main along Dove Street. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda as follows: Agenda Item #5-A, #5-B, #5-C, #5-D, tabled at the request of the applicant to July 18, 2000; Item #5-E, tabled at the request of the applicant to June 20, 2000; Item #8-B, subject to plat review summary #4; Item#10-A, limiting the variance to 12-months, or until 70% of the lots are sold with the sign size not to exceed 3'X6'; Item#10-B, as amended, noting for the record that with this action we would be waiving approximately $100,000 in fees for the benefit of the Carroll Independent School District; Item#10-C, and#10-D. Motion: Fawks Second: Kendall Ayes: Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, Potter, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on May 16, 2000. The minutes were approved as presented. 5-B. Ordinance No. 781, JSl Reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18.79 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25 miles per hour for neighborhood streets in Cambridge Place Addition subdivision. The City staff, Department of Public Safety and Public Works have been working with the Homeowners Association to investigate and reduce the speeding problem in the Cambridge Place Addition. DPS has placed the "smart trailer" and conducted additional enforcement to attempt to educate the offending drivers. The City Engineers have received a petition of request from the Cambridge Place Homeowners Association for the City Council to consider reducing the speed limits in their addition. The cost of the signs will be in the range of$400 to $600, depending upon the number needed. This amount of funds is available in the current budget. 5-C. Ordinance No. 782, 1st Reading, Authorizing and allowing a buy-back option for specific employees with Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). TMRS permits participating cities to pass an ordinance allowing its qualified employees to "buy-back"previously forfeited TMRS service Credit. This is possible even if the employee's service credit was previously terminated and the employee withdrew member deposits. Forfeited service can be bought back from the City of Southlake, or another participating TMRS city. The buy back ordinance does affect the City's TMRS contribution rate because the City must now provide the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 5 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL funds necessary to match the employee's contributions at a 2:1 ratio upon the employee's retirement. 5-D. Ordinance No. 480-332, 1 Sl Reading, (ZA 99-139), Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District with a requested zoning of "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Owners and Applicant: 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. This item was tabled at the request of the applicant to the July 18, 2000 City Council meeting. 5-E. Ordinance No. 480-342, 1St Reading (ZA 00-016), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District with a requested zoning of "0-1" Office District. Applicant Wilson & Stoneaker, L.L. C. Owner: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership. This item was tabled at the request of the applicant to the June 20, 2000 City Council meeting. 8-B. ZA 00-006, Plat Revision for Lot JR, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. Applicant: Chatham & Associates. This item was approved subject to the Plat Review Summary #4. 10-A. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A, for The Trailhead, 2260 Johnson Road and 525 North Pearson Lane. The Trailhead is a 28-lot subdivision located on the north side of Johnson Road between Pearson Lane and Randol Mill Avenue. Perry Homes has purchased the lots and is building houses on them. This request is to allow off site development signs at the nearest intersecting through streets. The proposed sign structure would comply with the ordinance criteria for a ground sign as specified in section 16-C of the ordinance. Staff has noted that in the last couple of years the larger subdivisions have been built out leaving only smaller parcels such as this available for development. A result of this situation is they tend to be more remote, creating a hardship for the builders to assist customers in finding their homes. This item was approved limiting the variance to 12-months or until 70% of the lots are sold with the sign size not to exceed 3'X6'. 10-B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for CISD No. 4 Addition (Middle/Intermediate School), located on the west side of South Kimball Avenue, approximately 900'south of East Southlake Boulevard. The site plan for CISD No. 4 was approved on March 21, 2000. The Developer's Agreement includes the construction of on-site public water lines, public sanitary sewer lines and public drainage improvements by CISD. The agreement also includes the construction of off-site sanitary sewer lines and a reinforced concrete box culvert extending from the school property to F.M. 1709 and a 12' water line Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 6 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL along South Kimball Avenue by CISD. In the Agreement, CISD requests the following fees be waived or they be given credit for them: 1. 3%Inspection Fees 2. 2%Administration Fees 3. Roadway Impact Fees 4. Water Impact Fees 5. Wastewater Impact Fees 6. Park Fees CISD agrees to use the most northerly driveway for construction access and construct the most southerly driveway as a right in/right out driveway. The detention pond on the site is designed to hold the increased runoff of the developed site plus 15%. The off-site drainage system is designed to carry the 100-year flood. The total amount of the fees is approximately $100,000. The motion was approved as amended, noting for the record that with this action the City would be waiving approximately $100,000 in fees for the benefit of the Carroll Independent School District. 10-C. Award of bid to W.R. Hodgson & Company, Inc.for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements to serve the Cross Timber Hills subdivision. The installation of sanitary sewer to serve Cross Timber Hills is part of the Phase III Neighborhood Sewer Program. This includes installation of sanitary sewer to serve Jellico Estates, Dove Acres, Hillwood Estates, as well as Cross Timber Hills. Cross Timber Hills is the only addition left to install sewer in this phase of the program. The CIP budget has $1,900,000 allocated for the construction of this project. The CIP budget also includes $180,000 for the engineering and surveying for this project. Therefore, the CIP budget includes a total of $2,080,000 for this project. The low bidder for this project [six bids were received] is W.R. Hodgson for a total bid amount of $2,566,793.49. The contractor will have 210 calendar days to complete this project. A copy of the memorandum presented by Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe regarding this item is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. 10-D. Approval of Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Pate Brothers Construction, Inc.for the construction of a 14-inch and 18-inch force main along Dove Street. The installation of the force main is complete for this project. As part of the easement negotiations, several residents that dedicated an easement requested that the disturbed areas from the construction within the easement area be block sodded rather than hydro mulched. The City normally hydro mulches the areas disturbed within the right-of-way and sods the areas within easements on private property. The original contract amount has increased due to the change orders by $73,882.72. A copy of the memorandum presented by Assistant City Engineer Shawn Poe regarding this item is hereby attached to the minutes of this meeting. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 7 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item#6, Public Forum Stuart Marshall, "Christmas Decor by Zenith". Stuart Marshall, with Christmas Decor by Zenith, stated, "Our company was responsible for decorating Southlake Town Square this last Christmas. Christmas Decor is a National/International Company with over 250 franchises and every year they award a prize for the best commercial display of the year. Southlake Town Square won the award this year and I wanted to give the award to Mayor Stacy to hang in the New Town Hall for having the best Town Square in the United States." Mr. Marshall stated this is the only award of its kind, because he does not know of another franchise that gives an award for this. Mayor Stacy stated this picture is very pretty and we are honored to receive it. Robert Curry, 211 Shenandoah Court, Argyle. Mr. Curry was present requesting that the City Council amend the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 to allow the sale of food products outside of large stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot. He stated he is proposing to conduct outside food sales from a safe, high quality portable cart as shown in the photographs that he presented. He stated there are similar operations in Lewisville, Denton, and Cleburne. The operations have been well received by the retailer and its employees and customers. The Planning Department has advised Mr. Curry that the zoning ordinance does not permit such an operation in the City of Southlake. Councilmember Gary Fawks stated he has no interest in changing the ordinance to allow for this use. Other Councilmembers agreed with Fawks in not wanting to change our ordinance for this use. Property Owners from Timarron addressed Council regarding the use for the Metro pool property on East Continental Boulevard. Audrey Baker and Judy Spoor stated they have a petition from Timarron residents who expressed that they do not want the Metro pool property used for a Park Service Center as discussed during the last City Council meeting. They expressed that they feel the use of the property now owned by the City should be used strictly for a park as was presented by the city at the time of the purchase. They also stated they feel the city should teardown the old building on the site as it is an eyesore. Agenda Item#7-D, Ordinance No. 480-339, 2"d Reading(ZA 00-014) Ordinance No. 480-339, 2"d Reading (ZA 00-014), Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for White's Chapel Methodist Church, on property legally described as Tracts 5G, 5G1, and a portion of 5F situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and Tract 3D1 and a portion of 3D situated in the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and a portion of the Pine Drive right-of-way, and all of Lot 1, Block A, White Chapel Methodist Church Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-204, Page 12, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a total of approximately 24 acres. Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "CS" Community Service District, with a requested zoning of "CS" Community Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 8 • UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Service District. Applicant: White's Chapel United Methodist Church, City of Southlake, and S. Garrett. Owners: White's Chapel United Methodist Church, City of Southlake, and S. Garrett. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter stated that twenty-three (23) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and six (6) responses were received from: o Cindy Wright, GCSW Ltd. 200 East Southlake Boulevard, Ste. 30, Southlake. In favor. o Blaine and Carolyn White, 250 Pine Street, Southlake. Opposed, "I am not in favor of the realignment of Pine or the proposed parking lot directly across the street from our residence." o David Ford,P.O. Box 1702 Roanoke, Texas, in favor. o Bobbie S. Barnes, 512 Northwood Trail, Southlake, opposed, "When I bought the adjoining property, the zoning commission assured me of a 200' minimum between my property and any improvements. All trees to provide buffer in the 200' boundary must be retained." o Charles and Amy Ezell, 514 Northwood Trail, Southlake, opposed. o Dale and Donna Ledbetter, 516 Northwood Trail, Southlake, opposed. Mr. Carpenter reviewed the items listed in the action taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 2000. PUBLIC HEARING: Tony Ezell, 514 Northwood Trail, Southlake. Mr. Ezell stated he is a property owner in Timarron and he is opposed to the site plan because there is not enough buffering between his property and the proposed parking lot. He stated he was told there would always be a 300' buffer between his property and the church property. He noted the church would loose forty to fifty parking spaces to get him his buffer. By having the 200' buffer it would save trees and it would give him the 200' buffer. He stated the church has addressed the"light" issue. Amy Ezell, 514 Northwood Trail, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Francis and Josh Weiser, 308 Waterford Court, Southlake. In support but did not wish to speak. John Buffalo, 622 Regency Crossing, Southlake. In support but did not wish to speak. Richard Garrison, Architect for church. Mr. Garrison explained to the council issues regarding the buffer and the lights. Mr. Garrison stated the church is volunteering an 80' buffer before any parking is done. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 9 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Ronnie Kendall commented about Mr. Ezell's concerns and was told by Mr. Garrison that the parking will be used for over flow parking only. W. Ralph Evans, 315 North Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake. Mr. Evans stated he is chairman of the board for White Chapel Methodist Church. Evans stated, "This area that has been discussed is heavily wooded, a lot of big trees [some with drip lines in excess of 60'] and we proposed to put curbs around the trees and park in between them. Possibly we will not be any closer than 150' but we don't want to make that commitment. 80' is a very good bufferyard. When Mr. Ezell purchased his property, there was a 400' buffer between this property and the church. The church is being fair in providing this much buffer." Mr. Ezell asked how often would that property be utilized? From his second story rooms, he can see the area 365 days per year. He invited the Council to come to his home and view the property. He stated his property line is only 30' from his house. Mayor Stacy stated that the buffer the church is offering exceeds all of the City ordinances. Public hearing closed. Motion was made to approve ZA 00-014, Ordinance No. 480-339, 2"a reading, for the Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for White's Chapel Methodist Church, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated May 11, 2000; subject to the provisions submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission excepting the second portion of bullet point in item #11; The church will remove the fourteen parking spaces across Mr. White's property and will make the bufferyard adjustments as submitted to the staff; accepting the church's commitment that no parking will be constructed within 80' of the south property line [beginning at the westernmost property line of the Small property and continuing to the southeast corner of the church property.] Motion: Standerfer Second: Fawks Ayes: Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Potter, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Council adjourned for recess at 8:15 p.m. Council returned to open session at 8:20 p.m. Agenda Item#8-A, Ordinance No. 480-338, 1st Reading (ZA 99-078) Ordinance No. 480-338, 1st Reading (ZA 99-078), Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and Tracts 1A and 1A1 situated in the R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with a requested zoning of"S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 10 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL with "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented this case, noting that fifty-two (52) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and eleven (11) responses were received, including; o Anthony Bologna, 100 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "As property owners, we have serious concerns related to this project; we are opposed to the fact of not strictly complying with the articulation ordinance. We are opposed that the building is taller than allowed by the ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40' to clear the height requirements." o David and Sandra Nuese, 102 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed, "The proposed Natatorium does not comply with the articulation ordinance, along with several other concerns stated in the cover letter." o Mary Ann and William Harless, 106 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed. "As property owners, we have serious concerns about this project. We are opposed to the fact that it is not complying strictly with the articulation ordinance. We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40' to clear the height requirements." o Reverend Michael B. Beaugh, Southlake Boulevard Presbyterian Church, P.O. Box 93164, Southlake, in favor. o David Howell, 1408 Park Place, Southlake, opposed. o Robert E. Finn Jr., 1404 Cambridge Crossing, Southlake, opposed. o Craig and Kathy Rodgers, 108 Waterford Drive Southlake, opposed. "I would like to see the building moved closer to the school and away from the homes. I would also like to see the turn around moved away from the homes (make it a bull nose turn around). I would also like to see more landscaping between the building and the homes." o Karen Nyhoff, 1404 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed, "Please do not remove the trees that are along the homeowner fence line. We feel the building is too tall and too close to homes. We are concerned with the parking lot turn around area being behind our home. We do not wish to have our yard illuminated any more than it already is by the tennis courts." o Kelly and Jack Kapich, 1402 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed, "Because the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. Opposed to the building being moved 40' to clear height requirements. Does not strictly comply with articulation ordinance. o Daniel and Susan George, 1406 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed. "We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40' to clear the height requirements." Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 11 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Rex Potter commented about the landscaping on this site and the reluctance of the Landscape Administrator to move forward with a plan for this site. Councilmember Gary Fawks stated from comments at JUC meetings, it is his understanding that the school district is trying to use more Texas native plants in their landscapings. Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson responded that there was two different plans submitted. One of the plans was presented by one design architect and it did not meet the minimum requirements of the bufferyard ordinance and the second architect working on the same site, and it did not match the plan in terms of bufferyards and it did not meet the minimum standard so they could not sign off on it. Councilmember Ronnie Kendall stated that it appears that there are a large number of people in opposition to this case and asked if this would require a super-majority vote of the Council for approval. Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy stated it would take a super-majority of the Council for approval. Mayor Stacy asked Council if they feel they can come to a decision or will it be necessary to wait until there is a full council before a vote is taken. Councilmembers stated they feel they can go forward with six members present. Mark Daniels, Total Program Management [TPM], 860 West Airport Freeway, Hurst, Texas. Mr. Daniels stated since the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, they have had meetings with the neighbors to the south and the east. The changes that have been made have been, addressing the south neighbors first: • They originally presented this plan to P & Z with four equipment buildings on it. After talking with the neighbors they changed the plan to one equipment building and located it behind the multi-purpose building, where the neighbors asked them to locate it. • They adjusted landscaping issues as far as screening along the eastern and southern board. The neighbors were not satisfied with what was presented at P & Z. All shaded trees are part of the mitigated trees that we have to do for the construction that is on-going. We are proposing a double staggered row of mitigated trees along the back fence. We are proposing some additional low canopy landscaping to further screen the area from the fence. We have a neighbor that does not have a fence and we are going to go back in and provide a fence for him. There is a neighbor that is about two feet lower in elevation than the rest of his neighbors and we are going to go in and provide him with a fence that is level with the top of his neighbors fence, so that it will continue at that level all the way out to the road. Additional trees will be put in for screening. They are going to provide 4"caliper trees replacing 3" caliper trees. • They will put in a burm at the bottom of the scoreboard to raise the screening. • Neighbors to the east, when the plan was presented to the P & Z, the tallest portion of the building is approximately 100' from the building line. They are asking for a variance on the 4:1 slope infringement and an Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 12 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL articulation variance. They were infringing on the 4:1 slope by 10 feet. The neighbors were not happy. • We have taken the natatorium and moved it as far as we feel comfortable with at this time and that is sixteen feet closer to the high school. One of the issues that they had,was a current storm sewer that came through. • The lighting for the parking will be handled with 2' to 4' ballard lights. There will be six to eight of those. • They have lowered the building by two feet, and it is now four feet out of variance on the 4:1 slope where they were 10' out of variance. • They have added twenty(20) additional parking spaces. • They are not in compliance with articulation. Councilmember Gary Fawks commented on the Joint Use of the natatorium, asking if the natatorium has been moved as far away from the residential property as you can? Mr. Daniels stated there is a requirement that because of the additional square footage of the high school, they are required to maintain a sixty-foot separation. Mayor Stacy commented that parking is a problem at all of the schools in the district, noting that joint use is a big part of this facility and he can see some joint use parking problems. He asked if all the parking has been addressed? PUBLIC COMMENTS: Susan Ansley, 607 Loving Court, Southlake. Ms. Ansley stated she is in favor of the plan as proposed. Greg Fisher, 1104 Crockett Court, Southlake. In favor of the plan as proposed. Jeff Luchey, 300 Southridge Lake Parkway, Southlake. Mr. Luchey stated he is a member of the nadatorium committee and has worked very hard with TPM and other members of the committee. He stated his only concern is that this was a bond issued approved by the citizens of Southlake. If this project is delayed, do to over-runs and construction costs, and funding problems, it might never get off the ground. The community needs this joint use facility. When it comes to satisfying the needs of a few people, we need to do what is best for everyone. Nancy Jackson, 1240 Post Oak Trail, Southlake. Ms. Jackson stated she is in support. Vanessa Hart, 1015 Highland Oaks Drive, Southlake. Ms. Hart stated she is in support. Josh Hubbard, 1310 Northridge, Southlake. Mr. Hubbard stated he is in support. Pam Jackson, 1240 Post Oak Trail, Southlake. Ms. Jackson stated she is in support. Victoria Luchey, 300 Southridge Lake Parkway, Southlake. Ms. Luchey stated she is in support. Benjamin Goodman, 1700 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake. In support. Amy Lakin, 400 Donley Court, Southlake. In support. Maura Keaton, 1401 Pecos, Southlake. In support. Terri Munch, 1402 Meadow Lane, Southlake. In support. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6,2000 Page 13 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Kathleen Grady, 2704 Sandstone, Southlake. In support. Councilmember Greg Standerfer requested a letter be written from Malcolm Jackson to Karen Gandy prior to the next meeting regarding the status of the trees. He asked staff to determine the maximum horticurally number of trees that is acceptable for that property. Standerfer stated, "If these trees are running at $500 per tree, I want to have as many trees as we need to protect the adjoining homeowners, I want to maximize the amount of tree mitigation that can be done on this property. I am not sure it is in the taxpayers best interest to use taxpayer money to plant trees in non-school properties which can not be mitigated on this property." Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson stated, "The issue came about dealing with the mitigation of trees that have been removed from the ball field site primarily. In accordance with the ordinance, there are no provisions for those to be specifically excluded. The ordinance does provide specific exclusion for building pad sites and within six feet to parking lot areas but does not address areas such as the ball field. Those trees that are present in that area, by ordinance should be mitigated. It is important for you to also understand that we have contacted Brent Kline with TPM and issued a letter with some suggestions for alternatives to address the tree mitigation issues. We only provided him with one recommendation, and certainly staff has a history of working with CISD very diligently in trying to resolve these types of problems. We share their concern. The building permits existing today are one-half million dollars because we don't charge the school because we are willing to work with the school and recognize the monetary limitations and we are willing to work with them on landscaping issues and the tree issues as well." Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 1st Reading (ZA 99-078), as submitted, with changes; subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, subject to the Planning and Zoning Commissions recommendations with the following exceptions: on Item 2, allowing the building height as shown; Item 4b, allowing the 4:1 slope resulting from the relocation of the natatorium 16' to the west and acknowledging the school district's commitment to make the following changes discussed this evening: Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the south (Park Place Addition). 1) Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 to 1, (4,000 sf. in size and located south of the multi purpose building. This location will require additional tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated. 2) Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan and b) additional low canopy trees to screen the shot put area along the fence. 3) School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is currently no fence and will reconstruct the property owner's fence at the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 14 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL southwest corner to be level with his neighbor's fence on the east all the way to Peytonville Avenue (resulting in a fence height of 6'to 10). 4) Drainage problem on the south caused by curb construction in the area will be corrected with ongoing construction. 5) Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated trees along the east and south of the ballfield area and a berm should be constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons being able to look over the fences into neighboring properties. All mitigated trees shall be on 4-inch caliper rather than 3-inch caliper. Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the East(Stone Lakes Addition). 1) Relocated the natatorium 16' to the west and lowered the building eave 2 resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment(from 10'to 4). 2) Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards. 3) Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block headlights from shining into eastern properties. 4) Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (3 '/2 to 4-feet tall) with a hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being accessible only to service and fire vehicles. 5) Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded areas on the plan, existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the bufferyard. 6) School to maintain fencing along the east side as well with the fence on the end being leveled. 7) Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be down lighting only as provided by sconces mounted at height of 7'. Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2nd reading: 1) Landscaping plan and tree mitigation plan for the site with a liberal interpretation of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ballfield area and requiring replacement of only trees that can reasonably be placed on this site. 2) Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility. Motion: Potter Second: Shankland Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 15 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Ayes: Potter, Shankland, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Councilmember Gary Fawks asked that both staffs work together on the parking issues and report by the second reading. Councilmember Rex Potter complimented the residents, city staff and TPM for all the efforts made to resolve the issues on this item. Agenda Item#7-F, ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition ZA 00-026, Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Current zoning is "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with "CS" Community Service District uses. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. Owner: Carroll I.S.D. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter made the presentation stating thirteen (13) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and two responses were received from: o Brian Mitcham, Mitcham Homes LLC, 5121 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville. In favor. o Randall Sullivan, Randy Sullivan Custom Homes, Inc. 1500 Corporate Circle, Suite 18, Southlake. In favor. Mr. Carpenter noted that on May 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved ZA 00-026, subject to; the Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, deleting Item#4 [articulation]. Mark Daniels, Total Program Management (TPM), 860 Airport Freeway, Hurst, Texas. Mr. Daniels stated the plan for this elementary school is like Rockenbaugh Elementary School with minor changes. He stated the only variance is to the articulation. He reviewed the plans for Council, noting they plan a decorative iron fence around most of the property, with a pedestrian open on Breeze Way at the request of the residents. The plan shows 167 parking spaces and added, for special events, they plan to contact the church for permission to share their parking lot. Mr. Daniels stated the major issues include down stream drainage on Continental Boulevard. He stated timing is an issue for the CISD as the package is out for bid at this time. Councilmember Ronnie Kendall stated safety is a major issue for the residents. A discussion was held with regard to the entrance to the school. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 16 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Greg Standerfer asked Mr. Daniels to ask the school board about changes to the fence to include an iron fence with no sidebars. Engineer for the CISD, Eddie Cheatham commented on the drainage issues. PUBLIC HEARING: Christine Neal, 1103 Fontaine, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Jennifer Devine, 1102 Versailles Court, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Jennifer Dealy, 702 Verdun Court, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Michelle Hall, 1115 Calais Drive, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Kelly Noetzel, 703 Verdun Court, Southlake. Opposed but did not wish to speak. Carol Boyd, 1102 Calais Drive, Southlake. Ms. Boyd stated she is concerned with people cutting through their subdivision if the entrance to the school is off of South Carroll Avenue. Kathy Pecora, 608 Bordeaux Drive, Southlake. Ms. Pecora also expressed concerns with people cutting through their subdivision if the entrance to the school is off of South Carroll Avenue. Laura Carroll, 607 Lorraine Drive, Southlake. Ms. Carroll stated she is opposed to the access as it is proposed. Ed Adams, 1203 Lorraine Court, Southlake. Mr. Adams suggested the school plans be flipped and facing the school off Breeze Way. Public hearing closed. Comments were made regarding the entrance to the school as proposed vs. off Breeze Way. Mr. Daniels stated to flip the drawing would require the plans going back to the architect and it would take an additional three months. It would be out of the question if the school were going to be open next fall. He stated he will take the suggest back to the school board on June 13, and come back to the City Council at the next meeting with a revised site plan. Mayor Stacy stated he is concerned with the drainage ditch, and suggested there be meeting with the staff and school personnel to work out the issues. He stated traffic is a problem that needs to be addressed. Councilmember Keith Shankland asked if there were meetings with the homeowners at the initial stage of this plan. Daniels responded yes, but not with the Versaillis property owners. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 17 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion was made to table ZA 00-026, at the request of the applicant, time certain, June 20, 2000, continuing the public hearing at that time. Motion: Potter Second: Fawks Ayes: Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #7-G, ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition ZA 00-027, Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. Motion was made to table ZA 00-027 at the request of the applicant, time certain, June 20, 2000. Motion: Potter Second: Standerfer Ayes: Potter, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6- 0 vote (to table) Agenda Item#7-A, Ordinance No. 480-341, 2"d Reading(ZA 99-125) Ordinance No. 480-341, 2nd Reading (ZA 99-125), Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Tri-Dal, Ltd., on property legally described as Lot 2R1, Block C, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3817, Plat Records, Tarrant County Texas, and being approximately 6.65 acres. Current zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to specifically allow"I-1"Light Industrial District uses plus a contractor's storage yard with outside storage. Requested zoning is "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to specifically allow "I-1" Light Industrial District uses plus a contractor's storage yard with outside storage. Owner and Applicant: Tri-Dal. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter made the presentation noting that thirteen (13) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and two (2) responses were received from: o Bob Gammon, SLML LP, P.O. Box 794, Colleyville, Texas, opposed, "This property has a large amount of traffic now which is very bad. By adding this building it will increase the traffic,which this area does not need." o John Dorety, 2875 Exchange, Southlake, Texas, in favor, "We own the property to the south, would like to be assured that we will incur no drainage problems." Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 18 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. John Levitt, Civil Roads Group, applicant. Mr. Levitt stated he was present to answer questions of Council. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-341, 2nd Reading (ZA 99-125), subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 28, 2000; as approved in first reading. Motion: Fawks Second: Standerfer Ayes: Fawks, Standerfer, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item#7-B, Ordinance No. 480-337, 2nd Reading (ZA 00-020) Ordinance No. 480-337, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-020), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Gateway Plaza, Phase II, on property legally described as portions of Tracts 1,2,3,4,5,6, & 7, W.E. Mayfield Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 39.5636 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested zoning is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and automobile accessories. Applicant: Wyndham Properties, Ltd. Owners: Conner Lam, Gregory P. Woodside, Donald E. Vogel, Chung Cheng Hong, Glen Scott Harrell, Wetzel Family Partnership, Ltd., and Gateway Phase II J.V. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter made the presentation noting that twenty- five (25) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and three (3)responses were received from: o Michael Wetzel, president, Wetzel Family Partnership, 4212 Wyldwood, Austin, Texas, in favor "Let them go! Do it...more tax base for Southlake." o Glen Scott Harrell, 2706 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. o Gregory P. Woodside, 2724 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, in favor "The businesses that will occupy this development should generate substantial additional tax revenue for the City of Southlake." PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Terry Wilkinson, Wyndham Properties, Southlake. Mr. Wilkinson stated he has made four changes to the plan from the first reading, including: Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 19 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL • Driveway B- at the request of staff, there is a proposed development to the south and we were requested to move the driveway to the south to keep it out of the creek and align it up; • Driveway A- staff has requested us to move this driveway a little bit further so that it will line up and provide additional stacking depth from the Georgetown Driveway. • Driveway D- they were requested to look at this driveway to align and to straighten it out. • Driveway A- changing the stacking depth. We feel we can provide better circulation for this parking lot by reducing the stacking depth. Greg McGahew, Costco. Mr. McGahew stated based on the City Council's request, they will be looking at moving the gas facility to the south end of the site so it will be central between SH 114 and F.M. 1709. They are requesting at this time to be able to move the gas station further to the south. Mr. Wilkinson stated another change that is sufficient is that they increased the bufferyard area. Mr. McGahew stated, "Two points I would like to address includes: along the south wall, we have articulation that is offset approximately 2.5 feet and staff feels the offset should be 5 feet. The location of the articulation interferes with the truck maneuverability at the docks so we are requesting that it could be 2.5 feet offset. Secondly, staff has come back and asked for articulation against the wall and again, we would like to have a 2.5 foot offset instead of 5 foot." Motion was made to Ordinance No. 480-337, 2"a Reading (ZA 00-020), and subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated June 2, 2000; subject to the motion made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the following revisions as presented by the applicant this evening: on Item lc (allowing maximum impervious coverage as 75% maximum on Tracts A&C and 80% on Tract B); Item #3 (accepting the developer's commitment to increase the size of the landscaped parking islands in front of the loading docks and the bay doors as shown); Item 4a (allowing Drive A and Drive B as shown- each drive moved to the west from the previous plan); Item 4b (allowing stacking as shown), but straightening out Drive D; Item 5 (allowing articulation as shown with 2 %2 foot rather than required 5-foot horizontal offsets on the south wall and allowing the vertical articulation on the east, but ensuring compliance with screening of mechanicals); allowing the relocation of the gasoline service station to the southeast corner of Tract 2 (North of Drive E) and being subject to the specific use permit requirements in Section 45 of Ordinance No. 480. Motion: Potter Second: Shankland Ayes: Potter, Shankland, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 20 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item#7-C, Conditional Sign Permit for Gateway Plaza, Phase II Chief of Building Services Malcolm Jackson presented the conditional sign permit for Gateway Plaza Development, Phase II. Jackson stated, "Terry Wilkinson, Wyndham Properties, has applied for a conditional sign permit for Gateway Plaza, Phase II. The sign criteria was identical to the sign standards approved by the City Council in February, 1999, for the original portion of Phase 1, save and accept for the height issue on one of the entrance monuments. During the work session, there was a question regarding a chart, which is being provided to Council now. Council also received a handout, which was provided by Mr. Wilkinson that did not make it during the process. Jackson continued to explain the reason for the request, noting the request does maintain the consistency with Phase I and makes it easier for our staff members to ensure compliance when making inspections." Motion was made to approve the conditional sign permit for Gateway Plaza, Phase II, subject to the removal of 48" one site request from the small anchor tenant. Motion: Standerfer Second: Kendall • Ayes: Standerfer, Kendall, Shankland, Potter, Fawks, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item#7-E, Ordinance No. 480-340,2nd Reading (ZA00-039) Ordinance No. 480-340, 2nd Reading, (ZA 00-039), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 2C2A situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being approximately 7.0 acres. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District with a requested zoning of "RE" Residential Estate District. Applicant: Struhs-Mattson Company, Ltd. Owners: Carlos Ramirez and Pam Bolen. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented ZA 00-039 for second reading, noting that twenty-eight (28) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification area and three (3) responses were received from: o Joan M. Hunter, 235 Silverwood Circle, Southlake, undecided, "On the surface this looks alright, but it would be nice to know details- how tall homes, will they be `built up' etc." o Pamela J. Bolen, 223 Lilac Lane, Southlake, in favor, "I am wanting to build a house on the property." o Kim D. Holmberg, 412 Bryn Meadows, Southlake, in favor. Mr. Carpenter noted that a change of zoning to the "RE" Residential Estate District does not require a Concept Plan Review by staff. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 21 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-340, 2nd Reading (ZA 00-039), as presented. Motion: Kendall Second: Shankland Ayes: Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item #7-H, ZA 00-042, Revised Site Plan for Block 2, Phase I, State 2, Southlake Town Square ZA 00-042, Revised Site Plan for Block 2, Phase 1, State 2, Southlake Town Square, on property legally described as Block 2, Southlake Town Square, Phase 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4892 and 4893, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 5.624 acres. Current Zoning is "N-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses. Applicant: Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. Owner: Southlake Venture West, L.P. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented the Revised Site Plan for Block 2, Phase 1, State 2, Southlake Town Square and stated that six (6) notices were sent to property owner within the 200' notification area with one(1)response in writing from: o Juergen Strunck, 200 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, undecided, "Information in this notice is insufficient for a considered response." Brian Stebbins, Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. Mr. Stebbins explained to the City Council why two Planning and Zoning Commissioners voted against the revised site plan, as well as the stacking depth issue. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve ZA 00-042, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 12, 2000; accepting the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations except for the stacking depth and the removal of parking spots; and accepting the plan as submitted. Motion: Fawks Second: Potter Ayes: Fawks, Potter, Kendall, Shankland, Standerfer, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 22 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item#7-I, Ordinance No. 780, 2nd Reading, Master Thoroughfare Plan Ordinance No. 780, 2nd Reading, Amendment to the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan, regarding the extension of Nolen Drive from Crooked Lane to State Highway 114. Senior Comprehensive Planner Chris Carpenter presented the amendment to the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan, regarding the extension of Nolen Drive from Crooked Lane to State Highway 114, adding, to amend the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan [March 4, 1997], to incorporate the addition of an arterial-level right- of-way in the vicinity of the Gateway Phase II and Easter Plaza developments between SH 114 to the north and Crooked Lane to the south, is shown as Exhibit "A" to the Master Thoroughfare Plan. As you may know, the text of the Master Thoroughfare Plan notes that the thoroughfares represented in the plan show only existing roadway networks, with the note that the city may need future rights-of-way at various points between existing roadways where no thoroughfare currently exists on the MTP if development conditions warrant it. In this case, the city would prefer to address the need for potential new rights-of-way in undeveloped areas by actually amending the MTP to show a new thoroughfare. Amending the MTP to show a potential thoroughfare accomplishes at least two important objectives: 1) it serves as an advanced notice to both property owners and potential developers that there is a need to accommodate a new thoroughfare in their plans prior to the development of the property, and 2) it serves as an advanced notice to surrounding property owners and others of possible changes to circulation patterns in the subject area. PUBLIC HEARING: No comments were made during the public hearing. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No 780, 2nd Reading as presented. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Agenda Item#12,Adjournment Mayor Rick Stacy adjourned the Regular City Council meeting of June 6, 2000 at 10:40 p.m. Mayor Rick Stacy Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 23 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES—NOT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary N:\City Secretary\MINUTES\CC-MIN-6-6-00..doc Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of June 6, 2000 Page 24 City of Southlake, Texas • MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-67, Authorizing the Director of Public Safety to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City Vehicles. Action Requested: City Council approves Resolution No. 00-67, authorizing the Director of Public Safety or the Chief of Police to submit applications to the Department of Transportation for Regular Exempt License Plates on certain City vehicles. Background: On April 18, 1989, Resolution No. 89-24, was approved by the City Council, authorizing Police Chief, James W. Campbell to sign the forms required to be submitted for registration requesting regular license plates for exempt vehicles. Due to the fact that the Chief of Police is no longer James W. Campbell, a new resolution 1111 must be submitted to the Department of Transportation in order for me to be able to obtain regular license plates for exempt vehicles for the City of Southlake, as requested by Director of Public Safety Garland Wilson. If the prior resolution had stated only the title, then the City would not need a new resolution on file at the Department of Transportation. It was suggested to me by the Department of Transportation that this resolution state only the titles authorized to submit the applications when the City desires to have regular license plates for exempt vehicles. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable • Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 89-24 Resolution No. 00-67 Page two Staff Recommendation: Council approves Resolution No. 00-67 as requested. City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY OR CHIEF OF POLICE TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ DEPARTMENT OF VEHICLE LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS AS REQUIRED BY V.C.S 6701m-2 FOR EXEMPT VEHCILE LICENSE PLATES. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, adopted Resolution No. 89-24 on April 18, 1989, allowing certain Fire and Police Department vehicles to be exempt from identification under Article V.C.S. 6701m-2; and, WHEREAS, it has been deemed that the resolution must state only the positions of individuals authorized to make application; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. That the City Council has determined that certain fire and police department vehicles, when used in the performance of official duties, are exempt under Article V.C.S. 6701m-2 from identification. Section 2. That the City Council authorizes the Director of Public Safety or the Chief of Police to sign the forms required to be submitted for registration requesting Regular License Plates for exempt vehicles. Section 3. That the City Council requests the Department of Transportation issue regular license plates upon submittal of the proper application for exempt vehicles. Section 4. That the City Secretary [with the signature of the Director of Public Safety or Chief of Police] forward a copy of this resolution along with the applications for registration requesting regular plates for exempt vehicles to the Texas Department of Transportation. Section 5. That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. E -3 City of Southlake, Texas • Resolution No. 00-67 Page two CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary • • City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. #89-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE POLICE CHIEF TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE V.C. S . 6701M-2 FOR EXEMPT VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES . WHEREAS , the City of Southlake, Texas , adopted Resolution #89-24 on April 18 , 1989 , allowing certain fire and police department vehicles to be exempt from identification under Article V.C. S . 6701m-2 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS : Section 1 . That the City Council has determined that certain fire and police department vehicles , when used in the performance o_ official duties, are exempt under Article V.C. S. 6701m-2 from identification . Section 2 . That the City Council authorizes the Police Chief, James W. Campbell, to sign the forms required to be submitted for registration requesting regular license plates for exempt vehicles . Section 3 . That the City Council requests the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation issue regular license plates upon submittal of the proper application for exempt vehicles . Section 4 . That the City Manager forward a copy of this resolution along with the application for registration requesting regular plates for exempt vehicles to the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. Section 5 . That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS , ON this the 18th day of April, 198 • . CITY !,- . OU'' . r. gLi ` By: ¶f4IIIiFILèI4 AT EST �,t4e-''Y `3�(T)� nn -rterholm, Mayor 4/, 7ti s. San • dra LeGrand, CitySecre i �-� i . APPROVED AS TO FORM: '`� ((2,7 aa,,,,___3gIt10,0 1111N1 City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-016 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-342 - First Reading-Rezoning - Tract 3C1 & a portion of Tract 3C, W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres. PURPOSE: Change the zoning of the property from "C-2" to "0-1" to fulfill a commitment made to the City Council. LOCATION: On the west side of South Peytonville Avenue approximately 300' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNER: Southlake Associates Limited Partnership APPLICANT: Wilson & Stonaker, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: May 18, 2000; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000; Approved(6-0) on consent at the applicant's request to table to the June 20, 2000, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that this request is being made by the applicant to fulfill a commitment made to the City Council during the consideration of the Site Plan for Walgreen's, Case No. ZA 99-103. The applicant has requested deferral of the required Concept Plan/Site Plan required for the change of zoning. If this deferral is granted a Site Plan approval shall be required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-016Z.doc Tract Map ZA00-016 A • ' tifir444•44r 4,111, inimrimarimpb• 4 W M yap 4 MCI^�/;��� :MIMI ���.im 1.1111111.11111.111CgasZki*it ** •E MI Zeirellkt rmifiliktialliff rumit;ripoo-0,- * 2 al WI*141:1‘r4146:47 6g1 Ill :ill 11111 M PIII?-UM laritteiZ.41 1 __441.1 41111"6_611 itt.t.41bk I 11111 .mo Imi EtIi gi l _1 Alliintri AAP' Imo , . _ baps At 4.OA .,...•�.11 i14�,� 1 IMPlillribi* "4 alitly IN sommirri ed, 1111 P imar 1 II 1 1 r 1 1 I id l.-* ♦ 41 n ��T'r iti 111111111W",1111111 MIMI 4 * 1.4 .. 1141;11Q ■■■fit_ ��r_ ,��:itaTi vs , 0 r■.1 "aill H -� o --_A— i _ 1*I ia* ir 2000 0 2000 Feet N Ate_W 7 \ E S ;11 -Z- , . Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-016 00 • d ■ ill • dlu1II ■ ...... an 11111 _.., A tami :4 JINN jail ► s ■ ■ mm■ ■ sr. Nimpr so ■ . Tim • IIII i•livMP' mi 1 ill � = Ju SOUTFiL•, illip . Z .,,adoi 2 lo 9rJ r Il h «t ,Nv ,, fa J� • .4- .( ■ to;c 'MLigionr _ .. ! , m 1111111.1MNIIIIIMitr)\ Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. W&B Kidd Family 1. "C-2" 1. Retail Commercial 1. 14.13 a Ltd.Prtnshp. 2. C.Lam 2. "C-2" 2. Retail Commercial 2. 1.80 acres 3. C.Lam 3. "C-2" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.65 acres 4. Carroll ISD 4. "S-P-1" 4. Public/Semi-Public 4. 52.89 acres 5. D.Davis 5. "AG" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 1.00 acres 6. R.Greenwood 6. "AG" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 1.00 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-016Z.doc 61 -3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-342 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3C1 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3C SITUATED IN THE W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.349 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM"C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-2" Local Retail N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 1 Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-F►LES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 2 ^' requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 3C1 and a portion of Tract 3C situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 3 Abstract No. 500, and being approximately 1.349 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "0-1" Office District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 4 land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 5 SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IWP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" TRACT `B' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Being a 1.349 acre tract of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 and being part of two tracts of land conveyed to Conner Lam as recorded by deed in Volume 8118, Page 1160 and Volume 8012, Page 700 and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Highway Monument found at the intersection of the south line of F.M. Highway No. 1709(a variable right-of-way) with the west line of Peytonville Avenue (a variable right-of-way); Thence South 25°03'41" West a distance of 24.59 feet to a'/2 inch iron rod set for corner; Thence South 01°03'54" West, along a line 10 feet west of the existing west line of Peytonville Avenue, a distance of 333.90 feet to a h inch iron rod set for corner and being the Point of Beginning of this description; Thence South 01°03'54" West, along a line 10 feet west of the existing west line of Peytonville Avenue, a distance of 140.12 feet to a V2 inch iron rod set for corner, Thence South 89°57'47" West, along a common line of said Conner tract and a tract conveyed to Donald and Louise Davis as recorded in Volume 6555, Page 501, a distance of 408.01 feet to a'/2 inch iron rod set for corner, Thence North 01°08'50" East, along common lines of said Conner tract and a tract conveyed to W& B Kidd Family L.P. as recorded in Volume 11587,Page 0692, a distance of 147.97 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner; Thence South 88°56'06" East, a distance of 407.73 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 58,746 square feet which is 1.349 acres of land. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-342.DOC Page 8 5�-( I r City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 16, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Recognize and appoint Recon, Zurka and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division. Action Requested: Recognize and appoint Recon, Zurka and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division. Background Information: The Southlake Department of Public Safety acquired its first canine in July of 1992. City Council created an official position for the canine with Resolution No. 92-33. Since the origination of the canine program, we have used three canines. The first canine used in service was Dune, followed by Fonzie and Luger. Currently, we have only one canine in use (Luger). Dune served us well and was retired in 1995 and has since passed on. Fonzie suffered a stroke as a result of a very active life and is retired. Luger is the only canine remaining active today. The City of Southlake is located in a zone known as the "High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area" by the Drug Enforcement Agency. As a result of this designation, we have applied for and received federal grants to combat drug trafficking along the 114 corridor. The first grant we received ($15,000.00) was for an "infra red scope" and the second ($17,000.00) was received last month for special applications. This equipment is used to find narcotics and totals $32,000.00 received in grants to combat drug use and trafficking in our community. Financial Considerations: The Officers own the dogs and provide them for our use at a cost of$150.00 per month, plus insurance on the animal. In the event the canine is injured, killed, or retired, the City will replace the canine from insurance proceeds. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to Board review. Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Discontinue the program and rely on basic intervention. 5M-1 411 Billy Campbell June 16,2000 • Page,2 Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 92-33 Staff Recommendation: Place the appointment of Recon, Zurka and Gaman as official canines for the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Police Services Division on the June 20, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. GW/bls • 5M-2 AJun-13-00 08:40A P.02 • r---- k City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 92-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RECOGNIZING THE CANINE AS AN OFFICIAL POSITION WITHIN THE SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE SERVICES DIVISION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Citizens of the City of Southlake to provide Public Safety Services in the detection of narcotics, the apprehension of criminal offenders, and the locating of lost persons; and, WHEREAS, canines have demonstrated their ability to assist in such public safety endeavors ; and, WHEREAS, the Southlake Department of Public Safety has established policy guidelines governing a canine program. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1 . The position of a Canine is hereby recognized an official position within the Southlake Department of Public Safety Police Services Division structure. Section 2 . The position of the Canine shall be governed by the policies, rules , and regulations as established by the Director of Public Safety and the applicable State and Federal Regulations. Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ' L , 1992 . o0.4lt 1 H l,� ',,, CITY OF SOUTHL TEXAS _�•' 3 \ y 3 By Gary Fi ke , Mayor ATTE • * * .a`� r itt ! t I andra L. LeGrand City Secretary 5M-3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM k June 16, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to execute agreements with Police Officers Ronald E. Wyrick, Gaylon Music and Richard Anderson for police canine use. Action Requested: Approve separate contracts for Ronald E. Wyrick, Gaylon Music and Richard Anderson for police canine use. Background Information: The Southlake Department of Public Safety acquired its first canine in July of 1992. The City Council created a position for the canine with resolution No. 92-33. Since the origination of the canine program, we have used three canines. The first canine used in service was Dune, followed by Fonzie and Luger. Currently, we have only one canine in use (Luger). Dune served us well and was retired in 1995 and has since passed on. Fonzie suffered a stroke as a result of a very active life and is retired. Luger is the only canine remaining active today. The City of Southlake is located in a zone known as the "High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area" by the Drug Enforcement Agency. As a result of this designation, we have applied for and received federal grants to combat drug trafficking along the 114 corridor. The first grant we received ($15,000.00) was for an "infra red scope" and the second ($17,000.00) was received last month for special applications. This equipment is used to find narcotics and totals $32,000.00 received in grants to combat drug use and trafficking in our community. Financial Considerations: The Officers own the dogs and provide them for our use at a cost of$150.00 per month, plus insurance on the animal. In the event the canine is injured, killed, or retired, the City will replace the canine from insurance proceeds. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to Board review. Legal Review: City Attorney Debra Drayovitch has reviewed and approved the agreements. Alternatives: Discontinue the program and rely on basic intervention. 5N-1 Billy Campbell June 16,2000 Page 2 Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 92-33 Contracts for Ronald E. Wyrick, Gaylon Music and Richard Anderson Staff Recommendation: Place the agreements for canine use with Police Officers Ronald E. Wyrick, Gaylon Music and Richard Anderson on the June 20, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. GW/bls • • 5N-2 Jun-13-00 08:40A P.02 t - City of Southlake,Texas -- RESOLUTION NO.92-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RECOGNIZING THE CANINE AS AN OFFICIAL POSITION WITHIN THE SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE SERVICES DIVISION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Citizens of the City of Southlake to provide Public Safety Services in the detection of narcotics, the apprehension of criminal offenders, and the locating of lost persons; and, WHEREAS, canines have demonstrated their ability to assist in such public safety endeavors ; and, WHEREAS, the Southlake Department of Public Safety has established policy guidelines governing a canine program. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1 . The position of a Canine is hereby recognized an official position within the Southlake Department of Public Safety Police Services Division structure. Section 2 . The position of the Canine shall be governed by the policies, rules , and regulations as established by the Director of Public Safety and the applicable State and Federal Regulations. Section 3 . This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ' L , 1992 . ,,0ngg11M"y,, O H L 44.N.J�, CITY OF SOUTHL TEXAS €. 1 BY: Gary Fi ke , Mayor ATTE ; * fir ,,,a,•�°`c st/J4-ittit bVi andra L. LeGrand City Secretary 5N-3 t POLICE CANINE USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this the. 2 day of J U n E- , 2000, between the City of Southlake, xas ("City"), a municipal corporation, located at 600 Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, and ,2C.j ' , a police officer employed by the City ("Officer"), ?CO` /NA�C��(� o r{—�� TX.[address]. WHEREAS, the City Police Department has a canine program, which provides for the individual ownership of a police canine by an officer, with the City paying the officer for the upkeep and training of the canine; and WHEREAS, the Officer has estimated the amount of time necessary to devote to care and upkeep of the canine, and the City agrees to compensate Officer for such time based upon this estimation; and WHEREAS, the City and the Officer desire to enter into to this Agreement to provide for the responsibilities of the City and of the Officer with respect to the care of the canine; NOW THEREFORE, the City and the Officer agree as follows: SECTION 1. SERVICES PROVIDED BY OFFICER. (a) The Officer agrees to provide, at the Officer's sole cost, the following services to the City: (1) Acquire and provide a canine suitable for law enforcement work; make the canine available for service for the equivalent of one police department shift a day, for a standard rotation schedule, as assigned by the Officer's supervisor. (2) Provide all necessary care, including without limitation appropriate food, shelter, grooming, veterinarian services, medications, treatments, etc. to ensure the canine's optimum health and physical condition. (3) Provide annual proof to the City that the canine has received all necessary shots, medications, and vaccinations, including without limitation, rabies and distemper/parvo vaccinations, and regular heartworm preventative medication. (b) The Officer agrees to provide the following services to the City, at the City's sole cost: (1) Prior to the City Council's approval of the canine for full service as a police dog, the Officer will ensure that the canine is certified for all police services, including, without limitation, tracking, drug detection, and personal protection. The City shall provide for the initial training of the canine,but only to the extent that such training does not exceed 160 hours. This initial training must be performed at a location specified by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. 5N-4 ‘t/ (2) After the canine's certification as a police dog, the Officer will ensure that the canine attends regularly scheduled weekly training conducted by a certified canine instructor selected by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. The City shall provide for the regular training of the dog, but only to the extent that such training does not exceed four hours per week. (3) The Officer will ensure that the canine obtains timely annual re-certification as a police dog, conducted and administered by a certified canine instructor selected by Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. (4) The Officer will accompany and direct the canine in performing law enforcement work when needed by the City. SECTION 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY (a) In consideration for the services provided by the Officer, the City agrees to provide the following, at the City's sole cost: (1) Maintain insurance coverages for the canine, to include: (i) health insurance for major illnesses and accidents; (ii) life insurance in an amount of not less than $25,000; and (iii) disability insurance with a scheduled value of no less than 60%of the insured amount. (2) In the event of loss of life or disability, the monies from the insurance policy(s) will be paid to the City to be used for the replacement of a canine. (3) A suitable location for keeping the canine at the police station during duty hours when not needed for an assignment. (b) The City shall pay the Officer a stipend of $150 per month to be used at the Officer's discretion for the routine maintenance, care, and training of the canine. SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH FLSA (a) The City and the Officer agree that the time the Officer spends for training and care of the canine will be included as a part of the Officer's regular work-period and regular duties, and will not constitute an additional duty. If the Officer is not able to schedule the training or care during his regular work-period, the Officer must give notice to and obtain,approval from the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative before the City will authorize overtime pay for training or caring for the canine. 5N-5 eff) (1) Based on prior experience in training canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of four hours per week to maintenance training of the canine (as specified in Section 1(b)(2) and (3), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of four hours per week during his regular work-period for the maintenance training of the canine. (2) Based on prior experience in caring for canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of 30 minutes per day to caring for the canine (as specified in Section 1(a)(2), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of 30 minutes per day during his regular work-period for the care of the canine. (b) The parties agree that the payment for the training allowed by subsection (a)(1) and the payment for the care allowed by subsection (a)(2), above, shall constitute the total compensation payable for the maintenance of the canine. SECTION 4. TERM AND TERMINATION The term of this Agreement is five years, to commence upon the date of execution of this Agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement earlier, with or without cause, upon 30 days notice to the other party, at the address specified in the preamble to this Agreement. Notice may be given by certified mail,return receipt requested, or by hand delivery. Notice is considered effective as of the date it is hand delivered, or upon receipt, if mailed. SECTION 5. GENERAL ORDERS The Officer and the City agree to comply with the General Orders of the City's Department of Public Safety establishing guidelines related to the operations of the police canine. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to the law, it is the intent of the parties that the remaining portions shall remain valid in full force and effect to the extent possible. 5N-6 EXECUTED this day of , 2000. 1 14 Offic r Southlake City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ATTEST: LEGALITY: City Attorney City Secretary Mayor 5N-7 4.‘e ,? - g,. y_~�' ---^>-- - -ter--- - V U U U U U U U U çy rIN � ics :-. 'D 00 iiii4tit t •9 Olt t, z1 :-,::-.- ..„.: .,,,, t4ti ,„i ..,.... , ___ ,_ ......_ _ ,, i - 1. r� )lib)tk' ri trZ _ � ', , .�.:., 'rr Z - •`••.,• ;--; i 00 Ebt5 t5 to certify that RONALD WYRICK & K-9 "GAMAN" (Reg. #LOSHB33303, Chip #40154B5E7C) ''' babe ntet Hie requtrement5 anb Sljotutt profttencp for thje tithe of y TBa5ic 43 43% 31EC li.-9 , arcotic5 Detection Eeam :, - for marijuana_ cocaine, mrthjamphjetamine, amphjetamtneanb Cjeroin a5 Set forth bp =hje 5tanbarb5 of the )outfjtabe la-9 jotice atabentp. Cji,:. zj <> dune. 8tb, 2000 e 31n5tructor C ,4"i:� baba for one pear nn FZ.-- ,. . . , - . • - • 7-.- -'14v.-,e'-.:.''...s'''. tr ir-r:-.:.-•:,-..',..•T-;..-•:..-.;*; '+--*.Y: '-';',".-'n'.-:.'44/Z-4r:.:':.-.-71;7;,,!.:7,...54 V.,Z,V244.41-. t.,-,..."`: -• -' 'Td.--- , .f.7::::475:, '-‘i:.,''-...:::,,4.. ..1'.N.4... 4.!';',..!:: :17 V:=',., ..c. Ant- ." ,I, t.,, ..,.....\ • .--c - ';‘,P.•-•.'",..;?? "til.-f-,,..--•;•• \--I.:,-:4-.17.1 V.•-s-.1'44' '1.4.,:,V. ••-•;-- `-'-ir4- - - ''' , '-'-', n tjAiLVitikiAk/AkijikAk)Aiii4 \J \s) Liiiiiki jAkja , .4. .:-::-If::: • .•': ,,,. 1 --„ra ,.4..,. i.:.-r- , --,,, t."-,7 ---4- i.'.-:. ...D -1 T -._.::'!,.. )0 #01 1 l'11411 11131 II - Ilt t4tItliiii .‘. 4..._, ,,,, : ..._.......... ..: , ...,..._ x...„ . .,.: „...„....: •,..?"•• , "?. •,, -"_-',... 'I. b.• Al fe:f.' Vii pt.. it0.1 t, ..•,,,•' s•,.,,.,.. I .4 ztri tO ' - - # i•-,-,, . ,-.. t5 to certify that .4.-P. .k RONALD WYRICK & K-9 "GANIAN'. Et (Reg. #LCrSHB33303,Chip #40154B5E7C) 1 babe met tbe reguiremertt5 anb 5boinn proficentp for tbe title of 4i.-- ....„ 5kt-, '... ..L; Ti3a5it Veilee i -9 3atrot Team ....,...,. ; :34-D a5 5et fortb bp tbe 5tanbarb5 of tbe i§outblake 1a-9 Polite Rtabemp. I C.,-.. -..., .--..:-:-.. '3) , ...: ..e-,,--..:- .e.g. ,..0.._ ,_,.. -..., :-:. ., ,----, . , 31?e 3insstructor 4.: -...2, balib for one pear ...-.f-!-,..., P-... i .......... ..:?....... _ _ ......f., _ _ _ _ _ __,, A.... ,,, 7 , • _Ai ... • y �Y "*�' ,a. .y. j c .?,o[�b.�' - j � ,�çj U U U U \J J \J U U \J _- i ..e!. V.,D r C.,P„, ot ,!. •-- Ci:::::' 1 0 iiill4tit il •9 ,)olitt a t41 . tillp ,,..., ,.„. c-7. ._ ..., 1 , ,. 4: PI: 4 , 44 .tzit .1 C - 0 ill& 1 , g y.:7 i I 9L t,,a....tI I I I 1 E0i5 i5 to certifp Mat Cox RONALD WYRICK & K-9 "GAMAN" 1 (Reg. #LOSHB33303, Chip#40154B5E7C) V,' babe met tije requirement5 nib 5fjolun proficencp for tije title of a5ic Vollee -9 Tracking Eeant a5 get fortfj by the 5tanbarb5 of tfje 'outfj[abe R.-9 Voice Zcabeinp. C. Cil,;:: 3une. 8tb, 2000 - batib for one pear a 1n5trucinrSt POLICE CANINE USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this the a 1II day of n e , 2000, between the City of Southlake, Texas S"City") a municipal corporation, located at 600 Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, and Ga ,/Cw rx,,5,c , a police officer employed by the City ("Officer"),.,7 lao tc/spAi De.Ap" 3/1arev.0e,7,1-. 7(,oS/ [address]. WHEREAS, the City Police Department has a canine program, which provides for the individual ownership of a police canine by an officer, with the City paying the officer for upkeep and training of the canine; and WHEREAS, the Officer has estimated the amount of time necessary to devote to car. .,nd upkeep of the canine, and the City agrees to compensate Officer for such time based upon this estimation; and WHEREAS, the City and the Officer desire to enter into to this Agreement to provide for the responsibilities of the City and of the Officer with respect to the care of the canine; NOW THEREFORE, the City and the Officer agree as follows: SECTION 1. SERVICES PROVIDED BY OFFICER. (a) The Officer agrees to provide, at the Officer's sole cost, the following services to the City: (1) Acquire and provide a canine suitable for law enforcement work; make the c J ne available for service for the equivalent of one police department shift a day, for a standard rotation schedule, as assigned by the Officer's supervisor. (2) Provide all necessary care, including without limitation appropriate food, shelter, grooming, veterinarian services, medications, treatments, etc. to ensure the canine's optimum health and physical condition. (3) Provide annual proof to the City that the canine has received all necessary shots, medications, and vaccinations, including without limitation, rabies and distemper/parvo vaccinations, and regular heartworm preventative medi�aLion. (b) The Officer agrees to provide the following services to the City, at the City's sole cost: (1) Prior to the City Council's approval of the canine for full service as a police dog, the Officer will ensure that the canine is certified for all police services, including, without limitation, tracking, drug detection, and personal protection. The r',ty shall provide for the initial training of the canine, but only to the extent that'su:h training does not exceed 160 hours. This initial training must be performed at a location specified by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. 5N-11 t (2) After the canine's certification as a police dog, the Officer will ensure that the canine attends regularly scheduled weekly training conducted by a certified canine instructor selected by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. The City shall provide for the regular training of the dog, but only to the extent that such training does not exceed four hours per week. (3) The Officer will ensure that the canine obtains timely annual re-certification as a police dog, conducted and administered by a certified canine instructor selected by Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. (4) The Officer will accompany and direct the canine in performing law enforcement work when needed by the City. SECTION 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY (a) In consideration for the services provided by the Officer, the City agrees to provide the following, at the City's sole cost: (1) Maintain insurance coverages for the canine, to include: (i) health insurance for major illnesses and accidents; (ii) life insurance in an amount of not less than $25,000; and (iii) disability insurance with a scheduled value of no less than 60%of the insured amount. (2) In the event of loss of life or disability, the monies from the insurance policy(s) will be paid to the City to be used for the replacement of a canine. (3) A suitable location for keeping the canine at the police station during duty hours when not needed for an assignment. (b) The City shall pay the Officer a stipend of $150 per month to be used at the Officer's discretion for the routine maintenance, care, and training of the canine. SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH FLSA (a) The City and the Officer agree that the time the Officer spends for training and care of the canine will be included as a part of the Officer's regular work-period and regular duties, and will not constitute an additional duty. If the Officer is not able to schedule the training or care during his regular work-period, the Officer must give notice to and obtain approval from the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative before the City will authorize overtime pay for training or caring for the canine. 5N-12 (1) Based on prior experience in training canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of four hours per week to maintenance training of the canine (as specified in Section l(b)(2) and (3), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of four hours per week during his regular work-period for the maintenance training of the canine. (2) Based on prior experience in caring for canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of 30 minutes per day to caring for the canine (as specified in Section 1(a)(2), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of 30 minutes per day during his regular work-period for the care of the canine. (b) The parties agree that the payment for the training allowed by subsection (a)(1) and the payment for the care allowed by subsection (a)(2), above, shall constitute the total compensation payable for the maintenance of the canine. SECTION 4. TERM AND TERMINATION The term of this Agreement is five years, to commence upon the date of execution of this Agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement earlier, with or without cause, upon 30 days notice to the other party, at the address specified in the preamble to this Agreement. Notice may be given by certified mail,return receipt requested, or by hand delivery. Notice is considered effective as of the date it is hand delivered, or upon receipt, if mailed. SECTION 5. GENERAL ORDERS The Officer and the City agree to comply with the General Orders of the City's Department of Public Safety establishing guidelines related to the operations of the police canine. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to the law, it is the intent of the parties that the remaining portions shall remain valid in full force and effect to the extent possible. 5N-13 EXECUTED this day of , 2000. Offic./ Southlake City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ATTEST: LEGALITY: City Attorney City Secretary Mayor 5N-14 V,rie fr:dri--r_i LAI \\--) ilL41111LAILA AV.AilAILIA- alLIAALVAIL4A6VAk..4-11k2A .-- -4 ,_„.. ,:--,0 ) -,‘ iP 4 Nft •-,A, .17tD t ti •9 , oittat4t1 .5v ..._ • _i.:.„. lipotii44 tiiip ,..........;__. r ,- ,„ ,._ ,.. ,::. ,... . ..”,, : ,, k 44 •.'.•• 04 4 I, al A I Ot •1%, .11° •••••' I 37, Ebi5 if; to certify tbat --q N C•••11:1 Al GAYLON MUSIC and K-9 "RECON" Ni-.. ---.— .4' : .. babe met Hy requirements; anb 5botun proficiency in -,,,,,,, --,i BASIC OBEDIENCE 0,1; "*-.•--k". .4 fortb by the 5tanbarb5 of tbe poutblake R-9 Volice SEtt mp. ,..,...„ :-,-: _ 0.::..ir•-•-., balib for one pear lea trurtor 4,--• 1 -.1.,3. .-q ‘. 1..„...6-11:rill"! IMIFIF1111101,111,111p,111y,111,111, Ikh, • • ,. . , , a 4-,-- ,_ kiALikAklijiklijatjAkjAkiALJALIkAkji -tirl (.0,. ::-Th . . )01kt zit41 �a ' ,, # iiii411t t • ,� r: . Illp __ c_,.. / r '' F,' 6 c Ir r 8%85z' I t r,.. .r r. r .r r r %. 4....,ve, a 0 %, .or..,.. a/ CIA zlji5 ig to certtfp that Kr: � � GAYLON MUSIC & K-9 "RECON" Cj babe met tlje requtrement5 anb gfjob�n proftcencp for the title of 1 V��%11ICC 1.-9 , arcottt Detection Team ' 0 _6,; al for marijuana, cocaine, metijampljetatnine, ampijetamineanb ljeroin . a5 Set fort b t e 5tanbarb5 of t e 'out late .-9 y��D lj p lj lj lj police �lcabemp. �: , / = ._ - Chi: y,1r. Tune. 8t�j, 2000 AO 1 / ` ' ; .� baiib for one pear ?eab 31n5t orCk ....,... '*- -' � 4 �.. . /VUV1l�1v �� �� U ,�/ L� vvLAL�, -�u .;:,.,._,-.,:!,,, ‘ . .,...: .:. ., _i, 0 00144 to .9 /)olitt zit4 .._:: ,_ .,. • ..,„ ..., :.__ ., :,., Ilip c:....1":., ..:.._ ., , ...I ,., ._ ,...-7,:4:.-- ,r..„ 'zkil, , - , ., il 14 1,, , .. r.-Czy A. xi [jig ig to certify tljat , i C1-4. GAYLON MUSIC & K-9 "RECON" -.`` babe met tlje requirements anb gljotun proficencp for tlje title ofto-,-,,.,.,,- 4 sf �`' TBas'ic V is: .11 EC . -9 Vatrot Team ag get fortlj by the gtanbarbg of tlj a 'outl)labe R-9 :; ^' OliCeCabeJttp. = .z (-?,:t7: S s�. 1-4 I ,3uue. 8tb, 2000 /.. �L ,!,.,.....,:t __ /,'".- '..' ID battb for one pear jbeab 1 Victor Pie to ....42, . f .. sx 401, Irme:_:,.._. viv _ ., ' ` � w , , s_ _ a . ' . •d: _ 1- - .. Ff ._sa ?vA ,:.5Y t3 i c.Yd Y4*r ftr3� .-... . .- - W...z f J \ 1J \j V T - - U V - - V v S ::4- • 0 litoi4litt, • , olitt zit4, 1t _, r.,..„, ,._,..:. JY't ..,,,. ,,,.., b ,....,,,,,,, P .`........, II 1 %:::::) .: ''. I / 1 1 I 11 si..... II Ce-', 11 ‘.b ,I1 1•\\,i'I z co ..f.- Eji5 15 to certify that ,_. GAYLON MUSIC & K-9 "RECON" r .. 7 t,..,., babe met the reqtiiretnent5 anb 5tjob.m profirentp for ttje title of .- Tga5it 13 is. .lee -9 Zratking Zeam c----_ .5_, ,,, a5 5et forth by the 5tanbarb5 of the fDouttjtake R-9 notice Rcabemp. r----- _,..,..,, ,----, „ ,_ jj, ' tune. 8t(j, 2000 (51/ rg batib for one pear eab Inot r r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ r\, ,,,,„3 '-' . ::...6 ,--'''''r— - !4 . t POLICE CANINE USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this these day of Jto,J� , 2000, between the City of Southlake, Texas ("City"), a municipal corporation, located at 600 Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, and ,i9 1ie, °,/a police officer employed by the City ("Officer"),LW o Q kfj ,./,7l 00u.rr G.4-s i [address]. '/ '7' t WHEREAS, the City Police Department has a canine program, which provides for the individual ownership of a police canine by an officer, with the City paying the officer for the upkeep and training of the canine; and WHEREAS, the Officer has estimated the amount of time necessary to devote to care and upkeep of the canine, and the City agrees to compensate Officer for such time based upon this estimation; and WHEREAS, the City and the Officer desire to enter into to this Agreement to provide for the responsibilities of the City and of the Officer with respect to the care of the canine; NOW THEREFORE, the City and the Officer agree as follows: SECTION 1. SERVICES PROVIDED BY OFFICER. (a) The Officer agrees to provide, at the Officer's sole cost, the following services to the City: (1) Acquire and provide a canine suitable for law enforcement work; make the canine available for service for the equivalent of one police department shift a day, for a standard rotation schedule, as assigned by the Officer's supervisor. (2) Provide all necessary care, including without limitation appropriate food, shelter, grooming, veterinarian services, medications, treatments, etc. to ensure the canine's optimum health and physical condition. (3) Provide annual proof to the City that the canine has received all necessary shots, medications, -and vaccinations, including without limitation, rabies and distemper/parvo vaccinations, and regular heartworm preventative medication. (b) The Officer agrees to provide the following services to the City, at the City's sole cost: (1) Prior to the City Council's approval of the canine for full service as a police dog,the Officer will ensure that the canine is certified for all police services, including, without limitation, tracking, drug detection, and personal protection. The City shall provide for the initial training of the canine, but only to the extent that such training does not exceed 160 hours. This initial training must be performed at a location specified by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. 5N-19 1 (2) After the canine's certification as a police dog,the Officer will ensure that the canine attends regularly scheduled weekly training conducted by a certified canine instructor selected by the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. The City shall provide for the regular training of the dog, but only to the extent that such training does not exceed four hours per week. (3) The Officer will ensure that the canine obtains timely annual re-certification as a police dog, conducted and administered by a certified canine instructor selected by Director of Public Safety or his designated representative. (4) The Officer will accompany and direct the canine in performing law enforcement work when needed by the City. SECTION 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY (a) In consideration for the services provided by the Officer, the City agrees to provide the following, at the City's sole cost: (1) Maintain insurance coverages for the canine, to include: (i) health insurance for major illnesses and accidents; (ii) life insurance in an amount of not less than $25,000; and (iii) disability insurance with a scheduled value of no less than 60% of the insured amount. (2) In the event of loss of life or disability, the monies from the insurance policy(s)will be paid to the City to be used for the replacement of a canine. (3) A suitable location for keeping the canine at the police station during duty hours when not needed for an assignment. (b) The City shall pay the Officer a stipend of $150 per month to be used at the Officer's discretion for the routine maintenance, care, and training of the canine. SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH FLSA (a) The City and the Officer agree that the time the Officer spends for training and care of the canine will be included as a part of the Officer's regular work-period and regular duties, and will not constitute an additional duty. If the Officer is not able to schedule the training or care during his regular work-period, the Officer must give notice to and obtain approval from the Director of Public Safety or his designated representative before the City will authorize overtime pay for training or caring for the canine. SN-20 0411 4- (1) Based on prior experience in training canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of four hours per week to maintenance training of the canine (as specified in Section 1(b)(2) and (3), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of four hours per week during his regular work-period for the maintenance training of the canine. (2) Based on prior experience in caring for canines, the Officer estimates that he will devote an average of 30 minutes per day to caring for the canine (as specified in Section 1(a)(2), above). Based on this estimation, which both parties believe is reasonable, the City agrees to allow the Officer the equivalent of 30 minutes per day during his regular work-period for the care of the canine. (b) The parties agree that the payment for the training allowed by subsection (a)(1) and the payment for the care allowed by subsection (a)(2), above, shall constitute the total compensation payable for the maintenance of the canine. SECTION 4. TERM AND TERMINATION The term of this Agreement is five years, to commence upon the date of execution of this Agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement earlier,with or without cause, upon 30 days notice to the other party, at the address specified in the preamble to this Agreement. Notice may be given by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by hand delivery. Notice is considered effective as of the date it is hand delivered, or upon receipt, if mailed. SECTION 5. GENERAL ORDERS The Officer and the City agree to comply with the General Orders of the City's Department of Public Safety establishing guidelines related to the operations of the police canine. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to the law, it is the intent of the parties that the remaining portions shall remain valid in full force and effect to the extent possible. 5N 21 EXECUTED this day of , 2000. icer Southlake City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ATTEST: LEGALITY: City Attorney City Secretary Mayor • 5N-22 kiaklaJALAvv \ IALitiALILAtAkijilLA ,��q # till4lit t •9 )01[Itt ziti , .., ___:.„, m ,%.,... -}ate � . _ Ilip i I lit t, `.... (......0,- a , .. .....,. ,11 I w `'3 LCji5 i5 to certifp that ' z. RICHARD ANDERSON & K-9 ' LUGER" , babe met ttje requirements anb 5tjob,n protium!) for tlje titte of ' '-_� I3JQQ E.-9 arcotic5rei: detection �eattt -5i for marijuana, cocaine, metbampbetamine, ampbetamineanb tjeroin is =.'1, a5 Set forth by the gtanbarb� of tbe 'outtjtabe Z -9 Votice tcabetttp. '' q. C*..*4 3Tutte. Sib, 2000 ��_ r )eab Itt%; uct r batib for one pear Crt.:5.IN /LA rifirlitrfirfir IlirgrrN__ TrAT 4 w kimAk2iiikjAiLlAklik-ALAkitik""""1", " : � � ^ T r 74 ...:,.„.,,.. p.:;. .,... -;,4 # till4kt Ili •9 /1011tt zt4ti . ..,1_.„,,. ..,.. .. .___ _ �4 C., w_ M X_: 4 ' I.. JAIL 4 1 C.J3- ill l / (ri ry Elji5 i0 to certify that - 4x . RICHARD ANDERSON & K-9 "ZURKA" 'F. (White House Shepherd's Zurka,Reg. #DL69899103, Chip #2206632B4C) .,.,.:, babe met tfje reguirementg anb 551jobun proficencp for tfje title of , Magic CC -9 arcotfco detection Team :: "- for marijuana, cocaine, metljampijetamine, ampljetainineanb heroin --7. 4--9 sacs get forth by the fitanbarbg of tlje 'outljlabe lit-9 Volice Zcabemp. ---.-'1! 1 4 \ l ,-14 11utte. acrj, z000 �•, __. .,[�. belt) for one pear eab Xrt5 or 4. jam' _ -I- . - e -€i::4 .+v:�'la:„=rf ..a.. s_% i. Y Ftz,. � i' wb.+ K �''d., ; .� .4'1',1 .. ZT:i't^:wr '<!+y�t aL { '� ' AiALA -,, ._, �� :1-_-;:.;: • i.,:75 # till4 kt R •9 ,,I,,,, z1,,, ,, ,..i.: k - ,._,..,,,i_ 1' ,.:_. C-.14 4,f ..,..4 , cl;z:". .744 1 1 / t :::41111"11:7 0, ii,;''' • •1 Ir 1 I• � ' •1 Iit k. a., 1 I . I •x ZEbi5 ii5 to certify tit . 1 RICHARD ANDERSON and K-9 "MIRKA" C.-,.. (White House Shepherd's Zurka,Reg. #DL69899103,Chip #2206632B4C) . '^-1 ,,ti. babe met the requirements anb 5boinn proficiency in fir: BASIC OBEDIENCE -:, 7.,?.D a5 get fortb bp tfje 5tanbarb5 of the ioutijtabe -9 Votice acabemp. w r C .R I 1 0 31une sttj, 2000 !0iA_.% % A . batib for onepear- �eaD 31 or �'�' C`w - .. ._., x ..:;g4 rS 1. _ ..a...‹.:-�;: :iak,0,�Y.s.i: Aa«:ty: .i .. e -....•a. .11 .,s +'fix.Lha',aW r '` xYh;Zk � :'i« .. .-.� City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-026 PROJECT: Site Plan - Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: . Site Plan for Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. PURPOSE: Site Plan approval is required prior to issuance of a building permit. LOCATION: On the north side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 400' west of South Carroll Avenue. OWNER: Carroll I.S.D. APPLICANT: Cheatham & Associates CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with "CS" Community Service District uses. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Brian Mitcham, Mitcham Homes LLC, 5121 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville, TX, in favor. (Received April 28, 2000.) • Randall Sullivan, Randy Sullivan Custom Homes, Inc., 1500 Corporate Circle, Suite 18, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received May 8, 2000.) One (1) response was received from outside the 200' notification area: • Keith Turner, 1027 E. Continental Boulevard, Southlake, TX opposed. See attached letter. (Received May 12, 2000.) • A second letter was received from Mr. Turner on May 17, 2000, opposed, "1. The district has no intention of containing the water on the property. 2. They need to provide a lane for access on Carroll to the school." See attached letter. • A third letter was received from Mr. Turner on May 17, 2000. See attached letter. P&Z ACTION: May 4, 2000; This item was on the Commission's agenda but was not heard and was continued to the May 18, 2000, agenda due to Case Resolution No. 97-22. r1A-I City of Southlake, Texas May 18, 2000; Approved(5-1) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, deleting Item#4 (articulation). COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000; Approved (6-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 20, 2000, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated June 16, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-026SP.doc .1R-2 Original Message From: Keith[SMTP:kcturner@flash.net] Sent: Friday, May 12,2000 8:21 AM To: kgandy@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: elementary on continental opposed 1. they need to add a longer stacking lane 2.drainage - 1) when you dug the ditch to catch Versaille's water we were told it was a retainage pond now the school says they will turn it into a channel) so they can get the water off their property and put it on my property faster. this is not acceptable 2) the school says they will fill the pond and wet land area with dirt because "the pond only holds water when it rains" That is the function of the pond ie.when it rains it catches the water that falls onthis property and holds it. If you fill the pond with dirt youy will be adding to the water flow going downstream and onto my property, this is not acceptable keith turner 1027 e continental BCD MAY 12 2000 1A-3 keith turner 1027 E.Continental Blvd Southlake,Tx 76092 Phone 817-488-7814 mobile 817-723-7171 Fax 817-488-3016 May 12,2000 RE: new elementary school at Continental 1. The five car staging lane the school district has proposed is inadequate. They need to get the traffic going to the school off of Carroll Ave. by building an actual road for the parents to wait on. 2. Their solution to the drainage problem is to make the retention pond a concrete causeway. This is not acceptable. When the water was diverted off of Versaille subdivision into this ditch, it was supposed to be a retention pond. This has always been a wetlands area. There were no ditches or channels for the water to exit this property until you dug what was supposed to be a retention pond and now the school proposes to take care of the water generated on their property by filling in the retaining ponds and sending their water downstream. This will result in flooding my property. 3. They plan to fill in the pond with dirt because "it only fills up with water when it rains". The reason the pond is there is to absorb the water before it goes downstream and floods me out. 4. The school needs to take care of the water as required by law. They should not be allowed to say that the water problem is the responsibility of the City of Southlake and that some day in the future TIF money will appear to correct the water problem. Sincerely, REV D M A "r; 12008 `:. -- Even it me piul,�,t� property without compensation. ago. John Wilson said he grows hay being flooded as a result as not I .IE�� � f the and raises cattle on his 25 acres building, the flooding south of Shady Grove he 5 Road, d vasi and Kell This fault,Lowry frightening for From Page 1B that water from because what it says _-- "l created five ditches in his land Texas cities, allows any kind Texas cities generally are not and washed away more than 18 is duat el the ty to go in, held liable for the engineering and inches of topsoil. did not design evenn design work done by a property Casey argued that because though they owner or a developer, which is Keller approved the Casey said his cie sys- ty can be held responsible,"ineer that development, why the decision could have far- tens, it is liable.reaching consequences for Texas clients were being inundated with Lowry said. Manager water from two developments that "If that development is seen Lyleci ties if it is upheld,City the city had approved. damage any surrounding proper- In Dthis case,r said. Supremeties, this ruling this the issue was just "I think the the onsibslediat the and cityw Dresher said. will see the facts and supportis held responsible, e approving permits," Casey said. believe that is not the state law in "That's what the city did in this jury's ruling," u rule Texas." development. We've been dial- A state district court j ry d In two weeks, lenged on our authority to simply that Keller had intentionally the court should gdecide whether a new trial will be approve a permit. If that is diverted thel flowage granted, Lowry said. If the court upheld, cities are out of business, causing permanentdenies the motion, the city is pre use that isgrow what we have to wKeller attorney Stan Lowry pared to appeal the original rue- eo Wr to nsowand expand." d o, a said. ye Wilsons' attorney, David said thereall the w natural land, and trig__ y, said Keller is making too way 5- 1?) is receiving no more Mitch Mitchell,(8 68 t of the case,which he says is the property n:rrclvrrttiltifl(�s[ 17)e 5.atn 3 ) om 'he city using the Wilsons' water now than it did 20 years • pol3e 2 j 2 RECD mAy .1 7 2000 Keith turner 1027 F. Continental Blvd Souttlake,Tx 76092 Phone 817-488-7814 mobile 817-723-7171 Fax 817-488-3016 prn "'1 I J uP_ i !eY May 12,2000 RE: new elementary school at Continental 1. The five car staging lane the school district has proposed is inadequate. They need to get the traffic going to the school off of Carroll Ave. by building an actual road for the parents to wait on. 2. Their solution to the drainage problem is to make the retention pond a concrete causeway. This is not acceptable. When the water was diverted off of Versaille subdivision into this ditch, it wits-supposed to be a retention pond. This has always been a wetlands area. There were no ditches or channels for the water to exit this property until you dug what was supposed to be a retention pond and now the school proposes to take care of the water generated on their property by filling in the retaining ponds and sending their water downstream. This will result in flooding my property. `9 3. 'They plan to fill in the pond with dirt because "it only fills up with water when it rains". The reason the pond is there is to absorb the water before it goes downstream and floods me out. 4. The school needs to take care of the water as required by law. They should not be allowed to say that the water problem is the responsibility of the City of Southlake and that some day in the future TIF money will appear to correct the water problem. 4i2 03 11 le �ssQ� 1A-1e�tivv A e. toty To � �,, P t 1)PQY5 Now G . � s�Y5 1- ke tAi,� �e � i s I J {, 'Dr% S t ! tJ DcJ.. StYvc(f`1 • AIL1 C ( 40fro ide 1\ 16 Lk,S Q - hi c 546. c\\ F G .e ) ) f-- t� 4 J he i\s iki(45 / A P a y- REP MAY 17 2000 . Tract Map ZA00-026 • / r- Ei: y _ L 1•mo,....47-01 :: .y,f.IIj�� / oiri fib • 13 •••;111::-Luipuni 4k N ai:e l I p PAI I o r 11u W slow�'\111■■Ee■110 N r- r 1 1!_'11b.s, A IroblE_ I v' +*♦ AM e milio �� I.h Alm■■el Ili �r0 I -I. 4;or ��r -t o-I" jil i mi=111Il� we •lfillilliii. Lod tip 1_,..a ,\•C-ICONTINENTAL - 1 =0- , L l_ ��t s • • IlL . �r�t �liuiiuii' r1 I HART —� yr- - �Ij�i�i� .*V. VIA1111144 maw ���1��: - -cn AN 2 FIlIIlNIV tiara 4. .1111111 _ ��������- 11 I I I / • I 2000 0 2000 Feet N Aligif. W / \ E S 11H Surrounding Property Owners . ZA00-026 7.i =1P"t"'IERk' - *MtL Str T AA NB OW II 11—i 7. ill Olt& Alliiivir i — r---• [ - IMMO `=g =: 3 416 7 g 9i 10 11me fil aii �5- !_4:: 15 32 I � I CONTINENTAL L 25 21 22 2120 19 18 17 18 SI 1411 \ -4- LT 11 r� 1111N1 ► 1_ � IUl1I �� # • ;' ,.. _'� �} _,„:. .. ,6,,, iri; Page 1 of 2 Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-026 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. C.Pond 1. "R-PUD" 1. Medium Density Residential 1. 0.04 acres 2. McGough Homes,Inc. 2. "R-PUD" 2. Medium Density Residential 2. 0.38 acres 3. V.Patrick Gray Custom Homes 3. "R-PUD" 3. Medium Density Residential 3. 0.38 acres 4. Versailles,Ltd. 4. "R-PUD" 4. Medium Density Residential 4. 0.38 acres 5. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 5. "R-PUD" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 0.38 acres 6. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 6. "R-PUD" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 0.39 acres 7. V.Patrick Gray Custom Homes 7. "R-PUD" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 0.34 acres 8. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 8. "R-PUD" 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.35 acres 9. Versailles,Ltd. 9. "R-PUD" 9. Medium Density Residential 9. 0.36 acres 10. Mitcham Homes,LLC 10. "R-PUD" 10. Medium Density Residential 10.0.36 acres 11.Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 11. "R-PUD" 11. Medium Density Residential 11.0.36 acres 12.Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 12. "R-PUD" 12. Medium Density Residential 12.0.41 acres 13. Versailles Ltd. 13. "R-PUD" 13.Medium Density Residential 13.0.49 acres 14. Versailles Ltd. 14. "R-PUD" 14.Medium Density Residential 14.0.44 acres 15. City of Southlake 15. "R-PUD" 15. Public Parks/Open Space 15.4.91 acres 16.Westerra Timarron LP 16. "R-PUD" 16. Medium Density Residential 16.0.26 acres 17. Westerra Timarron LP 17. "R-PUD" 17. Medium Density Residential 17.0.25 acres 18.Westerra Timarron LP 18. "R-PUD" 18. Medium Density Residential 18.0.26 acres 19.Westerra Timarron LP 19. "R-PUD" 19. Medium Density Residential 19.0.26 acres 20. Westerra Timarron LP 20."R-PUD" 20. Medium Density Residential 20.0.26 acres 21. Westerra Timarron LP 21. "R-PUD" 21. Medium Density Residential 21.0.26 acres 22.Westerra Timarron LP 22."R-PUD" 22. Medium Density Residential 22.0.29 acres 23. Westerra Timarron LP 23."R-PUD" 23. Medium Density Residential 23.0.28 acres 24. Westerra Timarron LP 24. "R-PUD" 24. Medium Density Residential 24.0.57 acres 25.ASF Homes,Inc. 25. "R-PUD" 25. Medium Density Residential 25.0.37 acres 26. Westerra Timarron LP 26. "R-PUD" 26. Medium Density Residential 26. 1.05 acres 27. Westerra Timarron LP 27. "R-PUD" 27. Medium Density Residential 27.0.42 acres 28.Westerra Timarron LP 28. "R-PUD" 28. Medium Density Residential 28.0.32 acres 29. Westerra Timarron LP 29."R-PUD" 29. Medium Density Residential 29.0.18 acres 30.J.Wright 30. "SF-20B" 30. Medium Density Residential 30.0.80 acres 31. Westerra Timarron LP 31."R-PUD" 31. Medium Density Residential 31.0.46 acres 32.Westerra Timarron LP 32."R-PUD" 32. Medium Density Residential 32.0.66 acres 33. Westerra Timarron LP 33. "R-PUD" 33. Medium Density Residential 33.0.49 acres 34.K&H Homes Ltd. 34."R-PUD" 34. Medium Density Residential 34.0.56 acres 35.Westerra Timarron LP. 35. "R-PUD" 35. Medium Density Residential 35.0.59 acres 36. W. Boren 36."AG" 36. Medium Density Residential 36. 1.0 acres 37. First Baptist Church of 37. "CS" 37. Public/Semi Public 37.2.02 acres Southlake 38. First Baptist Church of 38."R-PUD" 38. Medium Density Residential 38.0.34 acres Southlake N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-026SP.doc Page 2 of 2 r .q April 27, 2000 City of Southlake 8 RE: ZA-00-026 Response to Site Plan Review Summary—Site Plan, CISD Elementary#5 Total Program Management, Inc. Item 1: Corrected. Item 2: CISD will provide a temporary third lane on Carroll Ave. This will allow for access to 860 W.Airport Frwy. the School Site providing stacking space for left-hand turns from the South and a right Suite lot hand turn lane to the first drive from the North. CISD does not have budgeted nor can it Hurst,TX 76054 provide the full section of Carroll Ave. as the City of Southlake ha's plans to do in the future. (817)427-7500 fax(817)427-4708 Item3: CISD is requesting an articulation variance on this project. The School façade is a www.total-pm.com q 9 P J dimensional duplicate of Rockenbaugh Elementary School. Item 4: Site lighting of parking and building will comply with ordinance. Item 5: Drainage— a). Existing Open Drainage: CISD will fence the existing open drainage crossing the site from north to south. The drainage will be left open until the TIF monies are available to provide for an enclosed box culvert to eliminate the opening. b). Drainage to the downstream: CISD is currently prepared to install a weir in the open culvert to meter the flow of water off the school site and not allow for an increase in the current flow rate. Water will be detained on site in the culvert. If there is to be an improvement downstream to control water flow CISD will contribute to the improvement their portion of the increase in flow caused by the School Facility. Regards, Mark J Daniels, AIA, CSI, CCCA Program Manager Cc: John Craft, CISD Ted Gillum, CISD Gordon Johns, Cheatham &Assoc. Brent Kline, TPM Austin,TX Fort Worth,TX 1nIl1 0 Houston,TX City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY • Case No.: ZA 00-026 Review No: Four Date of Review: 06/16/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Carroll ISD No. 5 Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract 803, Tract 1A4 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Cheatham & Associates VLK Architects 1601 E. Lamar Blvd., #200 1161 Corporate Drive West, Suite 300 Arlington, TX. 76011 Arlington, TX. 76006 Phone: (817) 548-0696 Phone: (817) 633-1600 Fax: (817) 265-8532 Fax: (817) 633-9600 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/15/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 753. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations N Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 4 411 Building Articulation Y See Comment No. 4 Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y Complies 1. Parking spaces required for Phase I: 153; Parking spaces required with the Phase II addition: 163; Parking provided on the site plan: 175. Revise Site Data summary chart to reflect that 163 spaces are required instead of 173 spaces and that 175 spaces are provided instead of 167. 2. Provide a note on the site plan that the ultimate section of South Carroll Avenue will be constructed prior to the opening of school in a manner consistent with the Master Thoroughfare Plan and that all lanes will be concrete pavement. 3. An off-site drainage easement is required for proposed downstream improvements. 4. The following are comments in regards to residential adjacency: 1R-II City of Southlake, Texas - Ordinance 480, Section 43.13 (d) - Vertical and horizontal articulation is required on all • facades. The building does not meet the articulation standards. See attached articulation chart. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: Allow as Shown). 5. Show the location, orientation, type and height of any proposed lighting, signs, and exterior auditory. All exterior lighting shall comply with Lighting Ordinance 693-B. P&ZACTION: May 4, 2000; This item was on the Commission's agenda but was not heard and was continued to the May 18, 2000, agenda due to Case Resolution No. 97-22. May 18, 2000;Approved(5-1) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, deleting Item #4 (articulation). COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000;Approved(6-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the June, 20, 2000, City Council meeting. * The applicant submitted an amendment (dated June 15, 2000) to the previous site plan. Changes to the site plan included: 1) relocated the eastern most driveway to Carroll Avenue approximately 185 feet to the east in order to line up directly with Bordeaux Drive; and 2) increased the number of parking spaces proposed for the eastern most parking lot(13 spaces), while decreased the number of parallel parking spaces (5 spaces) (175 total parking spaces). The net increase from the previous site plan is 8 spaces. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of the site. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Provide a drainage easement for storm sewer pipe that is located between the drive on Continental Avenue and the pond located on the adjacent park. The pond will be left as is and reevaluated again this summer. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mark Daniels - TPM VIA FAX L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\#SPLAN-1.W PD • 1R-M2 City of Southlake, Texas Articulation Evaluation No.3 Case No. ZA 00-026 Date of Evaluation: 5/12/00 Elevations for eceived: 4/17/00 Front - facing: North Wall ht. = 13 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 39 53 36% No 39 64 64% No Min. artic. offset 2 4 100% Yes 2 4 100% Yes Min. artic. length 13 19 46% Yes 16 19 19% Yes Rear- facing South Wall ht. = 13 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 39 152 290% No 39 152 290% No Min. artic. offset 2 4 100% Yes 2 5 150% Yes Min. artic. length 38 19 -50% No 16 19 19% Yes Right- facing: 'West Wall ht. = 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 60 72 20% No 60 56 -7% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 6 100% Yes 3 3 0% Yes in. artic. length 18 10 -44% No 14 12 -14% No Left- facing: East Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 51 67 31% No 51 95 86% No Min. artic. offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 5 67% Yes Min. artic. length 8 8 0% Yes 23 57 148% Yes City of Southlake, Texas • TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-026 Date of Review: 3 —09 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Carroll I. S. D. No. 5 Addition (Site Plan) OWNER\DEVELOPER PREPARED BY: Carroll I. S. D. Cheatham & Associates 1101 N. Carroll Avenue 1601 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 200 Southlake, TX 76092 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: Phone: (817) 265-8532 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: IIII 1. The applicant submitted the Site Plan with all existing trees located on it. Although the scale is small, it does meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. Please relocate the storm sewer pipe from the West side of the access drive entering from Continental Blvd. The location of the pipe infringes on the critical root zone area of the trees that are being preserved West of the access drive. The storm sewer drain can be placed on the East side of the drive instead of the West. 3. Please relocate the placement of the proposed 8" water line and sanitary sewer on the South side of the school. Both of the lines cut directly through existing trees that will not be effected by construction. 4. Please look at shifting the circular drive on the South side of the building to the West. By doing this two (2) existing large Post Oaks can be preserved and less concrete would have to be installed for the access drive to the circular turn around. 5. I estimate that approximately fifteen (15) existing trees will have to be removed for the proposed construction. Nine (9) of the trees are not within the area of the building pad, parking, access drive or fire lane. 6. All proposed sidewalks that are proposed within the critical root zone area of existing trees should • be constructed at grade to reduce cutting or filling within the area. BUILDING INSPECTIONS City of Southlake, Texas * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of the site. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. BUILDING INSPECTIONS 1A-6 '-4413 DAL_AS PARKWAY ri, S ITE 2C1 CALLAS.TEXAS 75287 972.248.3006 FAX 972.248.3855 i LEE Encincc flfC March 27, 2000 Mr. Charlie Thomas City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: New Elementary School Campus (Carroll at Continental) Traffic Impact Analysis Review Dear Mr. Thomas: As per your request, we have reviewed the traffic impact study submitted by Innovative Transportation Solutions for the new elementary school campus of the Carroll Independent School District, located on Carroll Avenue near Continental. Based on this review, we offer the following comments: General Comments The report does not utilize figures to illustrate traffic distributions or assignments. This makes the report difficult to review. We would suggest future traffic impact studies be required to include figures to illustrate existing traffic volumes, projected traffic volumes, lane configurations and site traffic assignments. The assumptions made regarding directions of approach and traffic growth appear to be reasonable. Traffic in the immediate area may grow at a rate even greater than 8 percent due to the large residential areas that are developing adjacent to the site. Trip Generation Issues: The report utilizes a method of estimating trips based on student enrollment and staffing rather than standard trip generation rates. This results in higher projected peak hour trip generation for the schools. This is appropriate due to the anticipated low percentage of students who will walk to the school. The estimated trip generation for the site represents traffic that will be generated over the peak hours at the schools. In reality a majority of the A.VI trips will occur during a 20-30 minute period before classes begin. The same will be true of the PM trips after classes are dismissed. To more accurately assess the projected traffic operations at the area intersections during the schools AM and PM peak periods, the site traffic volumes should be doubled to iAip REGAPR 052000 represent an hourly flow rate and account for the short duration of the peak: Traffic Assignment and Analysis Issues: Traffic count data was compared to data collected by Lee Engineering. in July of 1999 at the intersections of Continental with Byron Nelson and Carroll. The AEI peak hour total entering volume counted by Lee at Byron Nelson was 1241 vehicles. The total entering volume presented in the report is 1272 vehicles. At Carroll the Lee count showed 1085 vehicles and the report showed 1078 vehicles in the AM peak hour. Based on this comparison the count data used in the analysis appears to be reliable. Left turn lanes were assumed to be present on Continental at Carroll and Breeze Way. These turn lanes will be important to the safe and efficient traffic operations in the area. A figure would make the trip distribution more clear. The analysis software utilized in the analysis has been updated. Utilizing the updated software would not significantly impact the results of the analysis. Traffic volume projections and analyses were reviewed for consistency. Several inconsistencies were found in the data input. These are highlighted in the attached copy of the traffic study. Most of these will have little if any impact on the results. Site Plan Issues: A 20 mile per hour school zone was recommended for the section of Carroll in front of the school. The recommendation was also made to wait to observe pedestrian crossing patterns until after the school opens and then establish cross walks if necessary. A reduced speed limit school zone may not be required if no pedestrian activity is expected. Based on our review, the intersection with Bordeaux is the likely location for the crossing. Sidewalks should be configured to accommodate the movement. We would also expect pedestrian movements across Continental Boulevard at the access drive to the new subdivision to the south. The traffic on Continental is fairy high volume and is uncontrolled at this intersection. This location should be carefully examined to be sure pedestrians are accommodated on the opening day for the school. Sidewalks should also be configured to accommodate the movement. The one-way circulation within the school site may create some awkward traffic movements in the area as visitors approaching from the west are forced to turn left at Breeze Way to access the school. It would be desirable to construct the ultimate section of Carroll Avenue in the area of the school prior to the opening. While projected volumes in 2002 may not warrant the ultimate section. the disruption caused by widening Carroll after the school is in operation would be significant. lA-it Conclusions: The improvements assumed on Continental need to be in place when the school opens. The widening of Carroll to its ultimate cross section should be completed before the school opens. _gain_ figures illustrating site traffic assignments would allow a more reliable review of the analysis and recommendations. There are a few technical issues raised above that need to be addressed before a final assessment of the impacts of the proposed development can be made. If you have any questions or would like a more thorough discussion of any of these issues, please contact me at (972) 248-3006. Sincerely, 7J/L--,./71-- Jose h T. Short, P.E. Office Manager 1R-5 st 01 „:„., �Ll \\ INE:.."ITT ,. - .A _ N N - ONO ,1P'=i 111 : ��l 1,rnNOWi..vnaxo>t. \ °per Q`� .. o� i T'_ �� I --f:iVgy7"i' •?r,f, ,.�r � °.cxE..i1. oaNr \ 4c� //4 t _I 3` - ,. W = E o link a ivavo,4 2g .1•a _ o _ _ \ vvr £ _ nii� � �ja�l aas'Io4tii.C.I. 5% \ Y ' \Sy, N4 / / °C . -I--1e N -1• ry 6G 2. \ =P74 IIaOSP 1 �Tlsa V . . N 9 A ri ,. , rAu P' MI Ail G, .- _�BL�11 �'IC '* VERSAILLE I - �uvn I ---1- / C B. 4. SE D. 29BSId 299 J.--L t c � � '..Li-. �.fl F. .�,',}{�.'gig• NIA y \ Es /s M1 :0 j� -�i T.I1,• •:�,;,,.�,..:.'i!� 1 ,IM�e . I`i�t V\ Y / .��/�� LORRA INE DRIVE LDRflNi NE CflUfli,t° •'o -, .,�� � l pf ,,''fi�te S1= y I E`l l u3 Over I ` •��.1F.. q. I' 95" / •� /•� E :r > r s r5-IN N rl�l'Ii{'ws! ns9 4 VIIIS�r�' CY t N46 5 E 4 .•Y ]x _--JJF' �l'i,%( I} t " 42 .V 4ax s5 "JT • ±on . .l� :e ROpiI5CARESi�'��10Y yi`� �T'-_ , I MET SO.fi.=1.109.7]0 .+�IS2k ;i.�- II _ dr. .', Y. �` -Fi7np��a/iao7 : "2, �C�,' 0 o- hhE .,A Hp�W'`fk l .=€ x7y2����y-LLt 11 II t•'-I 1 JJ,.` e_g nfiN' 4�` �r:, 1 -y.P•.� �� , ... .f. .._ tu' ilpi e 11 ,6 1.= °a ` __.___•_-_-----• :a VICINITY MAP 11 I / A �, '4sT,S� �� l P/L CARVE DATA .-� Lr.d minis Tx---�5' L -.1 •►' k -_ '� Q -ns°°• 1 J .�s�EI @ i bell © I f• .s SITE DATA SMEARY PHASE I PHASE 2 TOM h Ir L 1- e Il .a4.1=ML' Y{® +'>-,y„3 �EINWA _ n-.2•].•xa• �isn n..,rerse t«,.+v i.ea. nx•n ,104 ^.sam,a J n i A 2 N N _ a• I1'I�+ ry, I o o _ A R-65s.m• n..,«. .as 46111.nx.n� aonu= �\L -= .,R. .11= I� '" :-tlel � ' w CKO MRN,RtN4Na\ Lt;' ;35i 5x•E ISN 4340 W.II.46,141.04 WI 06¢ me= - r--6 I N niE.arc I .�a..`Nun"• ssw w b,n6,i.a,o n. ' t44 -Ill - I• , •„RIM •� 1 I-= o n..:t Y.MYND. RY GREEN �� S II 1 �sw .A """Ss.. ••� rl l,�.I d� 'h".!"' \ `\ I ; e-It•Iz•1>• na.wn OKA.R tn.•1SO n..n.n ±..0..SO.ri01.3 N.•s 9 1' I: I s'4 IM /Tor �.1 BLDE%_6.Lot I }1 P ASE 2 III ,It +f .Y.n....,.'[°.« � vuBLc pLacAtwN NE \ y\\' a i-iio.m' N. «..,,: FR a.v CAB' SL I "' ;1\� s I i',{� yry� R cn vnt°srair.a.xc LIM-SuaT•SVE ,9ten. 16 Ao I �gfe^..a'\ - Mir�E 4• � '•'1 1-4 .• Z 1 Le- 0.]z' G.,.14.01.. ' . NH. oa[ ,.M.n. �./� IAOte 6 OI R O L.tn Nr,. _ tt166F��� C EASA•LLEs 3990 .Af[WIN�. t1• 9oua -i N .itir" ! y1t177A• •_ �FI�1F •i ± '3-d 1`�► P a C.r 1 - aS^ ..9'. S \ SO J ""•NF9 59 21■ ski. �111�./ •P' 1 ,,l�il� u,nrru,.inn wnn •M 4✓1 •ti I ..� A �ts^os. I _It( 4e' r .) \elk r .mNt,.w,,.oa Ef. I ,1 'PAINING SUYWRT WA 't ,11 / oQ1 i .2 aa�R6 I 'N "o`1� 'eI „, j r.P \ fl y� �I 043140...r N. • n WI°,fir , - so.. ••'1 ,. k'. �,4r` >.? il _- VI.. 9}�r� v:v.�ais v - -.Aral ....„!..;:a., m✓ 1C s1u.l...".s► ''.y?�rYfii?. s �s s..�.s...,.a..,r..�iu xx,..s 1_ _ 774 �' =11'6ir'''Wi'Sa • V DENOTES IUILD,NG ENTRANCES n TM,- .=1�R %rNe - , :.: - ' - ��'�- --_-- , ■DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS • •.i ,�t7'R, ;L+' ..�' •t 4. 6ECTNRTis:+o�-rt +r•sr.t,...s„ TL,_-F¢•TEfrtc� _ _ y• .M-•-�j -.-3 .-.-.-.-.-.-•-. .-.-.-.t+�^ 0�®, GENERAL MOTE CO,ICERNINp Of-SITE DRAINAGE WRIT/DENTS: LOT�_•"�"�-�� `-- k rait-1 �0'•101L UN6AL...LaL LLeL1%A.L--F..- __�__ u ... 111111111010116 _ __ _ r __ Er2EC, ALTHOUGH AN WEN CNANIEL IS LIMN ON THIS PLAN.THE F,�7 fl - [ snon=D lEI N ---- t L : co �67ACU® SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFEAES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNKR- vu.iii ee°"ii`..".."Ana i3 L`,r{.s - :. r, *.J�.o..t r -� 7p 1161E s iREI - ° - ■Tffl)E•, GRORD IN A BOU OAYFAT. i Is e�1 I I VNr,r II ( s 1 ^ G 0_re® i"•1• ' +. v - L....1_ ••-' • I 1 - 1 •_ PER EXHIBIT E 6 THE TIE AGREEMENT FOR REIMVESTYENT ZOE THE Sy r• i `•y;- • I M141 T ,s•.t. 11 1 P „WISRMI CK GREEN 9. -• (/ ` i ® �jlTtaAS°�TO THE EOHII iNEKCOSi R TIDE BOX• IT SOS WIELD.rllE'HASTawaL n AON[nI / CAB. A SLIDE x150. 5151 ,.�--(( ® . DISTRICT WILL HAVE l BOX&AVERT CONSTRUCTED OIC THE -- -- ga L :�A' �:I n1..."� 1 II . \ ^ „N CITY HAS THE FINDS AVAILABLE TO REIIFIIRSE ne DISTRICT j� <. V" NON TGOAER1 LANE \ .11 FOR THE COST 6 THE COVERT. IF� \ • EARL DN BEND ' "Ih Sy 0 I :;. I•''.a LL..L.+;\ L- -R ' G s'C"A �-L Im :e C'°°°°i / LLi .,Wis., ,..:M- cExERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE ItrxmvEMT: 11 t•.h 'oC I-L..- r-- 2 i` • 4ffyF • r k.^' H.N TIC CIII 6 SOU HLAK HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE :�/ /�- z I I!-Lr'- I - --- / ,-.� . _ I n 1 R SHOULD BE FIVE IS/LAWS FOR THE LENGTH 6 THE 50100. II - 1-ln< .i - / '1 -• - - 'x - _R : 1 LI •n y FRONTAGE.TIE SCIIpOL DISTRICT WILL[INSTRUCT TIE -t 31 AD0I1IONN.THREE III LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS TIE FUNDS 1,•`/ / ><�_ .,Q^€I :nT.1""1 0¢1 •` T` nY y AVAILABLE TO REMORSE THE SCXOR DISTRICT FOR THE Alf/ / n ^ p _. ' I I = •T 1 I+ 01 0 _ri :1' STREET WIDENING NO RELATED DRAINAGE I00000EIENTS. Li.„ , I - Li) 1'^ p I I o' 1 o,.h ��-,f1"-LL-- --if`-'\ i \ ,:wZ Wet 'ANiEWTHAT ONARTr.'1WX THE Ali LANE AS DISTRICT MLINSDTNIC7 II n I 1 I A. \ x \ PUN AND IN THE TRAFFIC REACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY �>.t I- II - \ \ \ ,,,:I4;;7 . ITS.INC.MO DEL IVFREO TO THE CITY 6 50UTNUXE IN I) `" D I •.t1 I. it \ \ \ ti i FEBRUARY 2000. j L., ,NN MO I NOTE: I A FOUR 1.1 FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LIN,FENCE SHALL SITE PLAN SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS 0.INSTALLED ALONG THE PiNELL AS OF BREEZE WAY AND LOT 1. BLOCK 1, PROPERTY BOULEVARD AS HELL AS ALONG THE COYOI r'�iATRIAALL I�SHOORN FOR aw 11)..DL TRACT MO THE CITY Puuc CARROLL ISO No. 5 ADDITION *'�'• olrs ' To THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLOOE A SIX 161 FOOT MIDI VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINT FENCE SHALL ea.-A BE INSTALLED A1016 BOTH SIDES 6 TIE EXISTING DRAINAGE TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS , WW1.* so. OWE WRIA MOW ROA Nam CHANNEL AND SHALL RUN THE LENGTH 6 THE SCHOOL PROPERTY BEING IS.O11 ACRES A5 RECORDED IN LT.. 0 WOW NOW MOT SHOW FOR CLARITY I. VOLUTE 1215$.PAGE 2AS SOWRT CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE RTu6TE0 Nx THE . ALE SNNVEY �o.a AOSTRKT xo.AO]. AMMCOMM i CO TEXAS r • _ _ i tNNNNAl..I Law .11141 NW MOW Na. WNW 42.4 WW RA TRW WWII.614/14. TWA IOW om. 104 OM WA 451 N.o A10.11 .N.A.«.n.311 eru .t, N SIT NI 0 RfCD JUN i 5 200a 1;1 .nala - • 11 OM 1.24131163 MAC FANIu N.s>•A.0. ns .. N 113 I10,.i. 51.18}2yp[t/A'NCA'SA2 ABLIICEQ DSNA'N .Me. xn. In ,.. • A m 30401160 OWE nR A UAW n 3 °LROLL L j •AssacuR n pM ".no.n TOM WOW ONE LOT O ..M[QA.n,n.Ru I.,A.n "r�"•. ,1Ai1>H TM" IN,I an-a. MC. 1N,1 I1F- AIR4L I I.2000 Ea WTI tn0Y4R Nil UI-1•N 11 10114 35 FK2 CASE .2A 00-02G t _ Ln.AM ON 1003 COMLIT fin UM IOW CRAFT RYVl5E0 4-r4-00 SNEERS 6 ,II! ARCHITECTS V4.K NC4Nr.r:4. ,61 C.a.PM Wml ',oval ii.5 IE01)6 en.cm tnl Owe..Assam, NNE L.(SM SW 103 rnpm leas Ie066 Ili SN M.M. 51NLOUbI N.M.slums C..s.fl wa Ntr. isms 1E663 � en M4 eev r' LJ 1MW San Wen S+1 111 Fo1 Wor. 0 65 1NN1 en sm vxs G C3 - r4 r, r f, i r - � -=;• ¢���__" ' 4 • _� NORTH ELEVATION`-. `. N /\\_ vP ~ U CI l ui1GNlS U.IN WINNOW✓<15Nt ONlieNr -?r.!1r -i 0 a W • K wow NM NM C NOM.0fa1N!4]Y. y.:Y Z .n t D6 NOV UN.N IN ONOi 6 1N i11N.2N ,r J p NNW 6 le!!.e rep!MX • e 01901101eAYN NON NW NdN4l MIA 4PI4pN • • • • Q WWII DODO xOUl CR N lQlitl6 NO MR Mt (PA 3D A n❑^❑ - o Ne6 a CPiCeN!UMW. Cr) } Z Q W Q 0 • ~ W Cw w L C • w z w O Q w Z U N 6 1.1 , .�R P ESLY_. a.m.T .a,NN SOUTH ELEVATION al 9919 00 su"":'° CEC°JUN 1 5 2000 ..E,ra II! ARCHITECTS VLI( ArtlNecb 101 Cow.Om.WkN SO. NO A014034 Taw TM : OK Grim.m0 44•00440 NO E Um BM Si NO Mqa Tom I4036 N 5NMI SRKCIUML 16Ie SWAY C004.10400 3056E 1m 123 See 107 1fl N 1 1A6t1 N N1 1013 MEP 41411 Oak Ebrn R NCO Sall Wen Sti 242 F01NM ier 110S1 N NO 16N i 99yy i� EAST ELEVATION s _%• Nu lA Urn 1 Q SC 9 II 6C WPM 66 9N1 061116M p cc w It*SW NOaNN ISI O6061NC 48 Z Cl) • C.666WS1 IIl161q V N 66N66 III MINN _I 0 N7 Mil Al IIf NN ReIlal 00 -1 1 MO 103 NRYN Gal KC NONq NI M KGQ I TO KM p l KO Kt 1C1473 SO Cll a 1006166 VS01 NKr 0 6 NCCK Ni Q(UINN. 4.43 Z CC w Q 0 Z w LL o w z _j w og Q. : w Z U I : RN-.a. OM EIS ral—L -- - 1 I IMAM WT7 -- 1l— WEST ELEVATION 9919.00 SOIL K`,FP Rae 14 RECD JUN 15 2001 • •istn wenn LFaw COMBOS Ili IA,.Al[STAMM IA svilia.RA T- O 'L.SON LOW MO MI We MI Mille MOMS MA cOnnUCT(Al I. i ,,r .."1"..,"le: : „,,,v, ;5;:-= ' n`jsi N M.<M[nnK _r6.666."6 z r, i� Ill itg,q/Ia4 jai ie_ ~ i -.I �-' - �J ��1raeLna, ia.0-ii�' a // II_.�� ,,� \\ ��l[:Ib'I l � a� C�_ellii aP llati LM�� ' \� / .//,_T «< \ Iiiitf IIL'� ,y �� - �.Gl'�lyI� -� �vsu��[if,nJ. iiiiLL_i /I11E on .`u a. w;,�r-a.. L� u_T—az la:l @, ��Sit .-1 II10' Ili� �— _ ,�. _..-®`c�wrsx.�r -Law—' '._ •1 , I II IRI In',I�III tip llta /r'aa,ii.L`'�"'an�,i�0. 4b:p►ui<:.-y� Iz�:a0 IL:,Lv\� i 41. II IN,<at9il ---1\ \ `. f ' -� L .JIOG �/tueaII 1 \ I I I I i4� '`���� �,.�. �_� ��u��� \ .. .,• '+ �J41'` 1' _ IIIIII dII�i4. Ian" "a'"'g7.1 J•- i lir=_ 4 \ AM 1 czs.a. ,l!1 ,iifir.r., mit {'.�. wiwi► 'ok� I t:'Y47')Ey'.--••• 'h�E' -' �_..te . iL.. 1., \ FUTURE N \/ qll ,�i'�tls"s.::, J�.p!� 'f TX^-,, �:G 7' L , 1 CITY PARK N 1-- n I uiJe.]: rein i' ,aA -A c x .,,i' �� .J, I PARKINGr I O \0 ' �Ifir hI TII III �S �/ \ L) '' I I III `�i1< ii',' •'' I��,�" i•• k .. �, n I� F Q . 111. ,, I aL,..� -t 1i� .atsu SO Li PLAY LT `�� -` ,, I s � - n,V ar:.3n "a� -+ I • �fIEIU II`I I !-LIB I ' r Witlk. ` ra;-4�3 /0 ..J t--_ \ O I'" ( �- { �II I `li�,ss` i III( M.,... , `-II , � Ep.•D� j', �, .+-,v. S x z / i • I'�A '1 b 1` ,; s; �aaT_,LIr�� (+� A Tl'Nxaa '.1 � ' " Ow zo uVi i 1 11 i b l\\�,I I •Ili I ,;ii:.a_i : 1 • 1 I;I .i .0 4i? gi! t,,,,? ,} -1 lCt�9� <: nr ..�Itn, I- I , �al � lh: yl! ." r=,,..n ur's� py w a z o I f,K \ / I = III ill' �°�� • `�I ;7 I �i � /'_ _ 11 ...ma.'Sl� �If,\1�:. U o w Cr 1, N \ 111 is•at. w O 15 - r 1�'� " C \�/ /1 �,1�III ��.Jp' .4 !i�IL �L� �JR5 �,. 51,E i/ram / n� W z w N aT, „� IJJ N1�I��,��i'L - '�— � "� Q. �"`:°'=il �q w II s Z w ,I� — _/�' IIIHI J;f 'li „ itlIMEr. , �� , ya, `� ile- °� I O I �• C'y, iiiea:i u 1• w r':�'T I�!I �r.'l-L "S I Q.1i\VQI cc cc � �ita:9 �, Q )/// // t ru. ��,; I au_.... 11'1 ` '2. / v PL@ ii_n_I a.-.;.] AO 1 __I,� J'AY` / i If - �� ill _ aE II -dq i ,�, FIELD /`%'o jr V GLTa•� 1 TI CD C ris Ta I >; ;U (�,. i' I / 1 �-_ys air.:ad, v�/uI i W 1-a E *•Ap/ LA i;r� 1l i / . { �Ai�,y ,..,+ �t�1llpusa ,4� a i`i Z r�'j�4 I �. ' ca.u..wt.t► „Am... K /// a _�, l��\ IrII1�� cy �u�3� �traa j ` • ;, . -� .. .gym- �: . " - 1I►a, - -:'- _ s . L AVAIIIM AM OA < < <-- < ..r II GENERAL I T COICERNIMG a-SITE DRAINAGE IWROYELENIS: -<--GENERA.NOTE CONCERTING CARRELL AVENUE IIPROVE•EKT: —< o < < < < < F—L <— ALTHOUGH AN WET MAIWIFL IS SHOWN M THIS PLAN.DIE THE CITY W SOUTKLAKE RAS MILANO THAT CARRELL AVENUE SCHOOL DISTRICT PEFERES MAT THE DRAINAGE BE UKKR- -SITIIILO BE FIVE I51 LIES FEN TIE LENGTH 6 THE SCHOOL 4 7IIL GIIQIND IN A BOX CULVERT. -_-FHg1TACE.THE SCHOOL DISTRICT RILL CONSTRUCT THE r i -I --— _ ADDITIONAL THREE ISK LANES ONCE THE CITY RAS TIE fuoS _1 Di. L ---- <t PER EXHIBIT E W TIE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTIENT ZONE -I I-AVAILABLE TO REM O.%THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE ! �E I TO. I FROM THE CITY W RUN.AXE.IT WAS AGREE°THAT THE SKEET WIDENING Alal RELATED DRAINAGE IIPROVELENTS. cS' 1 DISIAICTY T /LL FUND BDK THE T OF DIE CIILYERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE HOOL UNTIL THAT TILE.THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT J U N I ,� 2000 ° ;# I V CITY RAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REMORSE THE DISTRICT A TEIPoRARY ASPHALT LANE AS INOIUTEO ON THIS y _U_ j i I fW M COST W THE[OLVERi. I I PLAN IN•_PM THE RIVERED 10 ATHE ANALYSIS SMILAX(AXE IN ' SHEET S :„•,7,7,..,...:„... , ,,,, , ,. , Li 4.7,_ _I 01_ .„__ _ L__I I I ‘,;.A -1,.^ t- -0., _Ii ,tiv _,1 -__ - /- ! 41127......!!..is _ ___ t_i7,2...--- ik__ 67404e„..., . .;.:. ,,, , , _, „," - '2 ----- ---''''''T-'-'-'-'4' i .,.; 774 ,r,T.W% ' . 7-k-,.--:_. - "Z`Milar _ ,,,o...,,. .„..„..„:„ ,,,„.....„:„ , ,),;,,,,,, ..,,,,4,!, ,• \ -2 r-,.,0:— Ik 0 , i GI-Ala CC V• P•1 C C . :?T'..i"I'. -- , : A e . .0<le 's I tio". .... : -• s•tri,c,7/4 ' ) \ .fl ''ii(111111114111 . : . _:-- .-:- • 4, 11”4103,&\.1 ..--• 40 ..n . i v • ,...• ..... iii '..45.s., 1 . 'Irf.)14 l' 1) : 1 .L.'2'Si. !*11, b•1 il r I,.i • i 1 !IY'2 i \',\ / '11"4414"14819X•19-2 ' : i's , ) ) / ./ NS.2-ifirteirei W. 11 _ geriihk-o --,-;1 :_.. i; ...j 1 ,14:i ...._ 1 ,o;do •-',"?:,v4(11441 jilt]ii 4.*•.,4,1 , Or it, I, ..- •••••••,•••.••••• •""ji 1'mks,„az,..- **11. i . + 0 1110=114.1 iii lic.._ vritzimmi -..,• ,.: , milim„, .....,:s.-------...4„4,,,,Ne,• NV".!..,.,..,t e p- el 9. • 44- .. [ 11 I 11 rill i L': :Se p• i ,o/ ; ,-E ---11'. I '''- •Z; -10tiatVla /44*111? ,..-"L"rm-4-• -, cil 1 t. i TAid -A .A 0_1141e,Rop, .6140 -1Es. . ._. . i i„ AVM 10'4 . 0111111 II 11111 likii"----....,,.i. .1. =4t=PT ns1Pc, I 1 n 11910 110 illi,, OA. , . 1 1 1 lump 9 • Air Ittri 0 We;4Ehi II 1 e r „c,„.. oi at .1, „, , Am 4_-----,.,,,,___ ,.,. t ..„ .2;,_____ _ _....„ ...„,,%...,71,,,r4m, 1 mionnidallimip 8 .. ..„ Agg V' il -•••,•-lim..rm. Xi CV ! I - --------\ '\‹! a -i g I; I ie 1...W..;1;:.;=8:i.1.2222 sasuaxasamax= U ; VI,C5V4ZKWCWSWICY4==.4Z Z..4,11 1 = Z tssatitesstttstsgsmxststsxstszmasszu a.- R t---, smassgstamtsgmt*tamscssyssztattztssz'- C.r1 ro cp ..r *::-..-;:-:-. CD . ... '.. .„," CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT rt ... NO 5 ADDITION CHEATHAM eXt ASSOCIATES . ... CONSULTING ENGINEERS oum NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INT F.IAMAR 4,11 CIT,:On . ..c T. ARLINOTOI,I,MINI (OR)U.O.kler1.101?).1.RAIn EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA MAP lb • • • • 1 , , - I w 7/ ...- In \ E +‘ , < l 4 il::}.4 i3c� I/\' \\ d IV/n...u,E / — •::/ . / Ji ' .+ � TMs1IMI EaOIYD.i°NMRa1riY. TA \�� XO; ite : •O.C.E V. IN I •ei Tr, K EDf mO-. IUOL,i \ �• fl a 4.Y. IN: a I 1 _ 7, AOUItl DAMAJ.AVE.X \ l 7 4le.� / 7 J.: EE CE LAT �i --—— c4. T.u, xc�I� p•� I��� '+ A�: 11/i. ..., .r `- ! i Ear¢Trmeic.sirlal'm `/ o O= A- -III •-1 1 ► i� lr ° r♦ ". d \ MISTING v.rcYcxE V Z m a 9 t .—_ ��fi11.�>_.r fl�dy' o a' f >+i'f: �5 #fir, _� ,�r® €/ Ir1r: •I Q ` • \ o hex mO `\ vEclualMOriYE` ��I ` "�R - ., I O III IV T III ' ; 6l! ,I `. "`0 • ' - \Eii'•' \ Tui P p!+� �� t044 � I al-SITE PAVING LEGEND w Z w a I .N�J #' per' a' AAfN1YAAArr a oiaVTo°n iiiicu oi�iI use'T'iuis• Y.E.P.UTILI S M ' . f'li \ r i i i, MAY R TO MO INSPECTED i I "'�'S'ne r Z.y..,pm 3 • �Ii r T \ T\ � Z co.F' REFER TO!AMR.SANITARY t� ,/J �p�C r .� I IftltrtlaID�I'ri E�p .� `I , �/1AU ' axr :TAILS I I %'A i+M Y0.S3M 1i�'O C.EI'`�R f J Z ij I: I----iii j y Y.E.• 0.W5 '-' i . ,u50 XE SPECl/l IOR 1NISfr1 T\ J f4�) / - I i i irlfl f• °m " t —�I ,. ; p y;:l:: ::::: :: l� \ \ ' oI 1 t 0. - y rtrt •� ram'- "7� ��AYB AriXB�Ar_1.JAAi/D ` TLNf L'D-YY'E ,.. .w �.. 4,1':. 6E-SIR r•YING LEGEND 1 § tN _ _ \ \\ I .I a i E��'a- ; ���,y�' I �rt a cz.w uf+oPfci�o°s�ml i°rr°Eicu_vf¢[ticrlars E I — ) r__.,_ �.. I t {��< r Cafa1ETE PAVEIJE ITA NA.L• AA A z $ 8 k + \l .n LIIE \ a mwo a = _ j.1 �s / PITY} I 'TES �-�-� I i .--�r+.e� __I .. .E.. •Lxq "�,"t aiew(I?/ u„ two �'_r.c'. 1.XE Ir1LCViilcT°Eio lS SO ic:i sPEL L000MPaev00 IoI I x tkcasTL M I[X •`l O.C.E.Y. 'e TT TO AND T 1 6 XSTNUCT CV.AT EXAO ALLS/YIN 71 �. = mr+ yE�� MALLS AM RY rILOT CAANNu fa {r3w� ►+ T�ii Url�iEciixCAM'iL o'wi`dfllE�Nff,qaTTu Az /�/ ..usr aoNrBlE1JrA1.r.�'--- -..'.....-.- --'I ,.1. - - -------- - f — { SNEET I I ,',' J Pd 1 a 200C . In L. --i-m-i-av ii—. ---tsc -lip-.,- �_ !�''� yiQY�._ .-._1 J .."..1 'Tl- 'Lr.Y Vrt:!--- 7.. � L�F; 1g e o�s� �J//r e`,�f i__. _ , ".4 %ice 1� �//J aval.0117,.. .IJ' ' ' _4; 1.,„, _ c: . -0.a.c,alt . 1/2. \ , .. oil „ kllp,s:E4k,,vlr:,.i.„.1- ... IP* lidlt:___FT7711 �1�,Q \.\ I 1 , `i1 e ; ;}I 19®net'1'4 I 1_ dill lil ,: " j i difi :iiPt 1 L' IT* \ ..----ty---2._ -----_ x---a&g..--..17i_2g, ,r, 1 . .PI ;.I,„: „ip l'----4:-//- WI i _,./.----..... 4.1.1"edididiiiiiiuji, • 1...,0!: :;j:.-iil_ ',.. _• II P\,„,,,wi •s; ' ts'd 1 [rim tE9,------ ;;•‘ .,�\ �,y I 1 i • • 4111:10 ..,... .4 v. / osso,op. fy . l711. �Si' •� � -F a ______ i I ' I --1 t / \ ' iiil I ' i s *A tl. % :4!?.-1 61°1 -11L- "7 __ - -1 . — '--- -,/FR b‘,T;I / s \CO -- ---- - < ..114*.ir 1\„„4 :tx.',/ ',-1,,, . 4i ,,\ ,, , l& :it, &.0.1%1 jaw fdlic[ff,\,;‘,;,, )_ 6 1/21 k 1 ;'' al tig+ \ ‘7•'--‘. sr .' -- .: k ' A Oliii 54. :CDC) - t, ;114,-.-:'?D-4 /17 ' ' \li I� '•�1!_ na 1 1 x i ' p II►0 1 1 ,...! .—...i , lit i /4.‘°' r A A etitifilib- 40711111/ 12 41 1(f4Th _ -= tii,ii , .ode„ -i � . . . , „ ,' „_e 71--�_-,�l Uzi, =B.::R 44414, p, ..„ I f 2,_ �.:�e i ��i-- -____ `� a) itiLVIIIElltralig" I�___; . Idaa £�e 1 gyp! i O in (-10L„m„ .,...400,41riftmdttmempk t' , 4& I1 .LttE F. r-----\ I >A® .i z> S_XeMiSSTSSSSiiiii__bCCCSSMUUM.m:M.Y. - - C CYYYCXCCCCCCeCCCCCSeX ,. SSSSSSSTTSTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSLLSSSSSSSSTSSlSTSTSSTTSS :s ' N :TXSG:.Va%LCX:P eii.. -%.tXCSXLX SXiYesvSYCiYYYM..iii SYS SYis.:.;-....a Ti 5i iwli w 'e NM z ..n a o,�,., CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT N NO.5 ADDITION C THAh1 F ASSOCIATES COMM NSUITING fYGINF0.5 NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ' ' C u.M .cr CD .4.. z...c ''I v PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA MAP • • EXTEND :;'�NEXIST 'EON::•> ' 4 ' a.c'\, S4E. I� 1$ L! IP!' 1 I , `— [B��■.Iwe so 1�w�• �_ -►_a��` Wx • Z{ , iiii aNil �• - f i ¢ s• STORY RE ---_ ( rpix... ' I _ �� _ VI.......,-'--.' �.\ z}I T ' /- T ��1� 4 ! aI � itora amok 1 -1 / : ' I.K \ , ,,lI ',413a "�P.Nt „ w. `� „di �F., .33_E�"-- 1 '/ i11 i!J"� " I r i1 A Rviivi �'I I . , , 1 —Alig lA latfil � �1 I I I�Ilhlq � 1 -aril �.E iw ol' • >.1 f=—X--- I Ii�IIrtktphu 11 '6fi". _ : • � ol• _ r — 1 I iP I 'I 1- ; l'� ►r►1 .41/1ai1111 ONZINI EIiITIKl .Aw. I' I @ . l�'t 1 .dll .4O�I� HP E L ,�1uII�I11I1te yw • rwmn itann miI ' , ..� iI .li \ I CTY PARK tII it IrI ti1 I iEI •II�a wI1i . a^ I 1—TJ dP< % le R rl��w �w1 ff� b� $ I ��II ►� \,1;.I ; ; _ l 4 ` �. E ti, o1I�I nn I I ~ ,c D ,'1y 'ii I'Tiii � �E�wIF,k ` • ,> 1Ft, 'I 6: y. gç' (j p FRIEALY II I o ,Y„TY 1�a I p f.W. , I I NI ® iE � IN aI 1 Ila ;It I, EI� L A ' I I a O p a ^{ I p � , �' . r l ]I "`IIII ; , L - 1oN • \ 1 ' io's'INF 'is IL r r Al1 i / N a Tara, I4 ° S ., � �y -=. .� � 1 � �uiT �♦�II — = , _ _ zz1 � —^ � , —� I /' a -1 l vy: , r a )1� r I 9 hN � e, 1 n � I gun W I CI I I,,�r I rE N'-m—1 ,../ It Oar IP/ r,•( %�I7L., - I\ , ' I GROAT—, iltit <, oruz.zPEE . cc S IM a .._ `E , " Tr 4i ( t,7, � / 1' leo ' , i , s. . —, l ' eil \ CC ' am A Q 1—.___ J 1 M „ 1 /L .... �I �jr6 I\ $IYw SEER' E e a 1 i -, ,;III( 0' 1 �i� >♦ I' lQ�\`� !7 �G p �� a y.y�� ~``\I t�Eu el if ` '" • - te _ S ,,� -�f ! . ' • " �lc�i "'-'• _ • -g`r:9 : - :r-. !j _ u _ IMMIIM' E j _ __ Cx YIST. _ o _ rETYMI E 1EIIE .101.SEXS EX00 ENO All I :R E_ -[ c 1PIM T'El'MCCLLXERT :Fr:, 000 EIIIST.NM., c a c l c c c c [ . c . c c c . . . . I c c < c I J-L I -- GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON-SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEIENTS: ----x----- LALTHOUGHANOPEN CHANIELISSHONNDNTHISPLAN. THESCHDUNO IN ABOXCCEFERT5 THATTHE DRAINAGERCUNDER- 4E Il'E)'sm cu ERT PER EXHIBIT E 6 THE TIE AG EEAENT FOR REINVESTMENT 20NEEn000L iTRINO. I FROM THE CITY OF SLITNLARE. IT WAS AGREED THAT THE I.{ CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOO CULVERT. THE SCHOOL .!: I25 EIR EI[MTI'uCE� IDISTRICT•ILL HAVE A BOO CLLVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIIOURSE THE DISTRICT i E ` - FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. I / I ----- SHEET 1 i `•� ,,,, '---------- / 1 I ) \\\\\S:-.."- 2 .. //// �4 `N . / , [/ / // N.4.. / \ j /ji7 tee, N _ _ ' rt� .: $OUTH.CAliROLL AVENUE i , ,,,, E7.:Nt\_____) F-1 _ (... ' wi" ' ci'., '',, it 1 1 mmwnmim, - _ ,\ , PLUG 1 1 ,I 1..., _ _ —— I —- - I `, .;, C'° X I _ _ --- PHASE 1 NEW FFEL6 0 OOZY SCHOOL ` _ _ } ' ; -.'--- — a PIRNINC SPACES'167 , - _ _ 4711, ,- , , -- 0 1'10 a I PLAY 7 0 �.J_ \� GROUND T--r ; North .) t: ?=7::74 x / 1� - rt.o Date.June0 PLAYING � �g ,� FIELD `.A) ', ` 16,200 • —� goo l o n y w' m. . a CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD Ame ent to Elementa. School #5 - Revised Site Plan 4 . . yets,m, T, ..',ViStr'''''''i..• '"?..,7"10,11',,,i''At:','•.' • :• ''' ' ' '..•'- ' , ,,A A.A. , ,. •,•t,"'..••S'1,-"l'''f.t.„,,704V4 :••,,,,,f.g."*.,P• Alt . • •, "..,,' ;,,,,,,..,q."•.'','"'•.,,''''".14:.":44:f.,;liti•lie..N.1 ' '''' . ; r'clr- ',:oulAii...•;i-,.,,,--.1)---.--=:-,, ,..'- ,'4,,-. .,., tiorw-- ' .''‘ . a.- ''','''''t-7:-‘7‘'''''‘it.-.::;,, ii,Foki.4i-:-.,... ..:.....„...i.ix', .1.4,f,k';',...-1..v.:.'...:. ,.:.,.•.., .i ::, '.. t.' 0,,...,:..,, ..--.-.4.,.-'- ..:. ', .- t. - t • "'"'-' -, IL 1€ , -•• ' .",:' - ''',..'s,•:"':;;;'#'7,4.•1'7'''" '''.'"..a,,•;a,;;;,,,,,:.: Iiigt.i.ii.o.f.;,..-.-:;., .... i, • . J-‘c,--.' ': .. .... . .. . . . - • , .,,--.,,,,mite , ,.. N01,.:,.,,, ..•_,;,..- ', .. • , I ( • 1 .,'Ilt ,1 - .0 ,,. ...,.„...,-.,,Z4 '',' ,'•:`,,,.., ' A' "lE, ,, ,, , ' 'f # i i ......4 ' ''''' • ' 4 . ' 4 — . - .,:-.'...-4:.i.-'47,..:- •-•:,..;44,-ii.::,.....,-,:.---. -.. ',..,. . .s.. . .. .. .. .... ... , . , . . . , .,,:,...i r•,,,,':;,..i7,,,,'.14.'::i'.44' r.';.„„,.,''...7: ,7?-..".;;;;..".":'''.'.:-.4.-,„,,., . ,..4..„.: ,- . .,.. .-..., , A., . 1.4.,..:-... ' . .. ..--'-. •Ir.- *I*, it t. .„.4'11,1 ZIt.,:.f.,F:.,,P1!.:. 'n 1-.:',4 a, ., , .--:0-,,,,,,''...".,;i,:,.,.'..:';.- '',,,t-,,-' *4.',.., :1.7.!. :,..,,...6f.:,,,,,::,,,. ..,.;,=.,,,,‘.1.::,,.;--''''=!' .Nt 1...?,.,:,1-.,':,..•.'. -.'-''-i--* '''','..----IR ''-'',,:,,'''. il',.:;‘.1,',. '-q,...;,-,.... . . '''' IF ' ti.' ' ' ••(;,,,.AA i'..-,..'".':.*: '•:,-,,,..,'.,'-'...•,., -. '.t::..71 4'..,..::,,,,t:',:i-,;;;.:;1).-f,.''''?:',,,-',.. .;;:;,,,, ,'T',?:.,,. ::;:,.: ,..,,,,?.'v:'14., ,,',7,,re... ,: . ,..,;;.-' ,-;,:: .,..,:,,,.::,::::;,,,,T,,,r::, , ,-; 7 ,1,•:,:,';'.., , 'h,...' , ,. .,kc ---7,- :Z.,:..--''''', .":4:.,',"..ttc,-r:::',',''.' .:. . ,'.4,g' Ta''..&-:'''.4' '''''','''''''''-''. i ,. i , 1 ., -. ,. ... , , , . I, .. , . I i . I : - , , , . .:. I . „, i i 1 .- . ;(:." i i ' - . t ,- t i ! 1 . • i .r .,:s , , i . „ i. 1 ., ,, ,,,......C44:k .Hp,-1,' 0:, .. 1,1 ' •-- 'y ' :* I 1 i *'-::11.,'"'4 ,.,-::•',.',.. ' 4. ,'..4' ''-. ''• i 1 ( i ' -7.1,"i:' ,: 1. ..„, , , , ..-....,, ..... .... :,- . .„„„,,,,,.,...,., .,„,,,,, , , .,..„,... .„-,,,,..,.„, .. ,,.,,, . .,. '1?...41'4'41'...',4A's • •A''.:; ..',.. ..."••"4 ";,-..,,,,,i".4',4,..<'--;:• • •.. '4" ,! ; . :" '- ,« .._ -' )i. - A.'''''••f".'''..: IA^...r,,,i- -' ''i, • 1 "y'4...4j:5,„--;'e,'ip,.,f..i'4,.,;,,,,'7,,.-.;:aait,,-4,:....:,' - ..,. `,.,.-- -*'"":-,k'.•,.,' -".:'-%',-...,.%-7..:•i*'L,."4..0 p/*. %.'..7..i t,..•„'•'r''.,h:•,i'+o.„,,r'ct,i!•*.-'44'44:'.'''.,t11',-..0(:i.'.P..!*..':,,1/4"--,--i 7ir,.. f'..,,i..•`'-..:...i.'t'.1'.4'.;r.4,-,,*-„7i l.,, ,,,,-'.'.::,'.......-;-*,„;1..11..*'144:'.,,.,:.k:„."*,,.4."' ' ''„*.;*,,'-,,0.1,.4414.70' 7'v7:-4..-:,,'I1f „ 1t. . ",.! --t: ! - ' : - . .. . ... - . III . tAvt- -, '_- ','. . ' 7,.. ! '.«,,''.',-', :7, - - , - ,r...`,76..*.•;.. 1 ''' . .', -'',* ' *,*•-• -- '• , . - ..',Iikil,),-• `. , ' , , ..,...„-., . , ..,e ,,. , . ' , . . • ' , S . ,. -, 1. ... , , . , .. '' ' ' ''. ,•:1:1:Cle;*'1: ' r " ., ' i '.-a. .•'''''ii", ,., .'',.' -....,-.,4,4::...,::.••....i. -. -` .-. . ' .' '-'' ...'.411%'-';' . ,..,.-s . ';'.::'''''''''''''...'.'. . •- - •• ',..:7;,%,k7•,;.‘:,.,..?; k A-",ftiL.',1'.'''., , ,- .,;.-..f..,,,,,':-.',':1,.-,..:' '''''',4*,:',401-- = . s'„,.- '‘'L''V_44.1•:'3,4e,:i . tar''''''' :•••.....*," , STI.`•,-:•'•!if,.S.'..2-'::,' , ' - .,'''' ' .. .. ','„. •........ ;tt:.,:.„,.Nfi,,-._,,,,:::,,,,,i,Awlit ',:-; 1.-*;-4,,,...,..;-=',.1",,f,:-:.:,:.,k,..:-.-- •....`',- . „.,.. ', ..'..-',/,::;*,4!;.-,tit",:;,4,4--!.1;,./..k1:4'1"--.-,*.r ,,,, -s.::',,,,,,.‘,'-',:.,,-',,, . . . -,-,',.•,.,,,,: - ',•.!:',.:4....c,:z, (,..,:-..9).",:it::7,‘,:*_',4',..:-:.1.,...%.,,,t...,- .j,;.::,s,:mj!....:-:-:-......:.:, '': -?-:,-.. :. '-';,i,...,:;7;.;.,:'':,'''..'' ''.''''':-.:',.,q,,,... . '..' ,,,::;•'.;''' .' :::',..---, ". ..1.;('':,':.,,i-ii.v,'-.;-. r.. .,. -:.. -: ,... .,,...- .... - -.--'-. : . ',.. - ;., :':.,.. . ,,1 ......,..•-:,.'.-.,:.',.::,..,7,Xf1-.1 FENCING TYPE PROPOSED PROVIDED BY CISD ill-N City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-027 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat - Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll I.S.D. No. 5 Addition, on property legally described as Tract 1A4 situated in the J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, and being approximately 16.081 acres. PURPOSE: Preliminary Plat is required prior to Final Plat. A Final Plat must be filed with Tarrant County Plat Records prior to issuance of a building permit. LOCATION: On the north side of East Continental Boulevard approximately 400' west of South Carroll Avenue. OWNER: Carroll I.S.D. APPLICANT: Cheatham & Associates CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with "CS" Community Service District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Brian Mitcham, Mitcham Homes LLC, 5121 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville, TX, in favor. (Received April 28, 2000.) • Randall Sullivan, Randy Sullivan Custom Homes, Inc., 1500 Corporate Circle, Suite 18, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received May 8, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: May 4, 2000; This item was on the Commission's agenda but was not heard and was continued to the May 18, 2000, agenda due to Case Resolution No. 97-22. May 18, 2000; Approved (5-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, adding a comment regarding the addition of a common access easement with the park property at the northeast corner. COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000; Approved (6-0) to table to the June 20, 2000, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000 N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-027PP.doc 78-( Tract Map ZA00-027 Ala,t, eillini,111111� ut 1I.III■IT ,� H. W Ellingr, :: AV IN Irewitt,,,,i4P _ �1IIIt:11iiU LI .. ., ....num,. ,,..,..„.,........:wag. iv ...,, 4.. ._., likil tlIT ISIICIW ill Ail frba SO OW NM 7100 NS— 3.41144t= — -1 InEginnrillir 010 IL INIP MI -4!•1r_tt ii■.el b= 111ak /iii� .MOWsi : :C•1■1 NMI NMI NE !14T in:+ en -o•VW00 MN 4r 116i►��!' o■I■■■► a uo♦t������''1� El- 1iiE , - :�■■■: 1aal,♦`lr ��� 1ioN �M aI?i4t = aL• ,#�1�[i.J: a.,:.ter, % .- 1 ik iiima, vs Imie 11u1111■i ■laill.1=0I107 lit■■ Z �— Porilliikir v;:i:i,i11:1dIc1I� ■: .11r �1111IIIIII. -.' co d — —. 01111111111/ �1111111M1: ein. �' I`lI I \ 16 — •aiir/i���t•i��11117suk. ...■1.j► , �Iff(�(I1'` i.,. = l ♦� /4 ■lrm -� ■1111111f%1E0 1-I_ - co Et sig 1 %*No ARP♦♦ i""=.4: "::I M111111112m ;m 1 )•;, is- :1111111 :.1t:,=:S_�'�g:vI:I: i g■■■. i °D No 2000 0 2000 Feet N W /r E S 78-2 Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-027 , 'T I L .. fv,NB OW } 1 r 1Ph1 Oak INEM IM — %67 8 91 101112 13 � : 14 !;. _sa:.Sall 36 r-'11 0 11111111114 35 IF ±—C n 1 I � gill 1111 �■04 c z- 15 gl I t . ,. CONTINENTAL -_ 2927 xs 22 21 20�B 1a a ie 1 -S_ MI MI kV 0C 111N1 ___L s-1 ___-4 41* 46 h 41illittiv f-,. [ lir 41 , Page 1 of 2 `te-3 Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-027 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. C.Pond 1. "R-PUD" 1. Medium Density Residential 1. 0.04 acres 2. McGough Homes,Inc. 2. "R-PUD" 2. Medium Density Residential 2. 0.38 acres 3. V. Patrick Gray Custom Homes 3. "R-PUD" 3. Medium Density Residential 3. 0.38 acres 4. Versailles,Ltd. 4. "R-PUD" 4. Medium Density Residential 4. 0.38 acres 5. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 5. "R-PUD" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 0.38 acres 6. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 6. "R-PUD" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 0.39 acres 7. V.Patrick Gray Custom Homes 7. "R-PUD" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 0.34 acres 8. Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 8. "R-PUD" 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.35 acres 9. Versailles,Ltd. 9. "R-PUD" 9. Medium Density Residential 9. 0.36 acres 10.Mitcham Homes,LLC 10. "R-PUD" 10. Medium Density Residential 10.0.36 acres 11.Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 11."R-PUD" 11. Medium Density Residential 11.0.36 acres 12.Randy Sullivan Custom Homes 12. "R-PUD" 12. Medium Density Residential 12.0.41 acres 13.Versailles Ltd. 13."R-PUD" 13. Medium Density Residential 13.0.49 acres 14.Versailles Ltd. 14."R-PUD" 14. Medium Density Residential 14.0.44 acres 15. City of Southlake 15."R-PUD" 15.Public Parks/Open Space 15.4.91 acres 16. Westerra Timarron LP 16."R-PUD" 16.Medium Density Residential 16.0.26 acres 17.Westerra Timarron LP 17."R-PUD" 17.Medium Density Residential 17.0.25 acres 18.Westerra Timarron LP 18."R-PUD" 18. Medium Density Residential 18.0.26 acres 19.Westerra Timarron LP 19. "R-PUD" 19. Medium Density Residential 19.0.26 acres 20.Westerra Timarron LP 20. "R-PUD" 20. Medium Density Residential 20.0.26 acres 21.Westerra Timarron LP 21. "R-PUD" 21. Medium Density Residential 21.0.26 acres 22.Westerra Timarron LP 22. "R-PUD" 22. Medium Density Residential 22.0.29 acres 23.Westerra Timarron LP 23. "R-PUD" 23. Medium Density Residential 23.0.28 acres 24.Westerra Timarron LP 24."R-PUD" 24. Medium Density Residential 24.0.57 acres 25.ASF Homes,Inc. 25."R-PUD" 25.Medium Density Residential 25.0.37 acres 26.Westerra Timarron LP 26. "R-PUD" 26. Medium Density Residential 26. 1.05 acres 27. Westerra Timarron LP 27. "R-PUD" 27. Medium Density Residential 27.0.42 acres 28.Westerra Timarron LP 28. "R-PUD" 28.Medium Density Residential 28.0.32 acres 29. Westerra Timarron LP 29. "R-PUD" 29. Medium Density Residential 29.0.18 acres 30.J.Wright 30."SF-20B" 30.Medium Density Residential 30.0.80 acres 31.Westerra Timarron LP 31."R-PUD" 31.Medium Density Residential 31.0.46 acres 32.Westerra Timarron LP 32."R-PUD" 32.Medium Density Residential 32.0.66 acres 33.Westerra Timarron LP 33. "R-PUD" 33.Medium Density Residential 33.0.49 acres 34.K&H Homes Ltd. 34. "R-PUD" 34. Medium Density Residential 34.0.56 acres 35.Westerra Timarron LP. 35."R-PUD" 35.Medium Density Residential 35.0.59 acres 36.W.Boren 36."AG" 36.Medium Density Residential 36. 1.0 acres 37. First Baptist Church of 37."CS" 37.Public/Semi Public 37.2.02 acres Southlake 38. First Baptist Church of 38."R-PUD" 38. Medium Density Residential 38.0.34 acres Southlake N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-027SP.doc Page 2 of 2 �g-Y City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 00-027 Revised Review No: Three Date of Review: 06/2/00 Project Name: Preliminary Plat- Carroll I. S. D. No. 5 Addition, being 16.081 acres out of the J. W. Hale Survey, Abstract No 803 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Cheatham & Associates Cheatham & Associates 1601 E. Lamar Blvd., #200 1601 E. Lamar Blvd., #200 Arlington, Texas Arlington, Texas Phone: (817) 548-0696 Phone: (817) 548-0696 Fax: (817) 265-8532 Fax: (817) 265-8532 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/17/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. 1. Remove the 15' building line shown along the eastern property line. 2. Provide minimum finish floor elevations on the final plat as required by Public Works. 3. Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage as required by public works on the final plat. Easements for private services are not required. 4. Provide a common access easements in accordance with the site plan which provides access to the parking lot located on the Noble Oaks Park. P&Z ACTION: May 4, 2000; This item was on the Commission's agenda but was not heard and was continued to the May 18, 2000, agenda due to Case Resolution No. 97-22. May 18, 2000;Approved(5-1)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2000, adding a comment regarding the addition of a common access easement with the park property at the northeast corner. COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000;Approved(6-0) to table to the June 20, 2000, City Council meeting. * A Final Plat and a Developers Agreement approval is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * Denotes Informational Comment • City of Southlake, Texas cc: Mark Daniels TPM VIA FAX: ABOVE Gordon Johns, Cheatham and Associates VIA FAX: ABOVE 2 1 11 Av'1u D ITT Burl, \ ii: ,\ ',../' = I �x{) � 1<..,--I -I- -..._ T�,.I • w Min EWE /` kk va�DrclxRr P.9PaND-- \ \\ c, n % -_ c`+ ^ _ /� ^ i f '.'I N. I _} E.cs il►1 R. ' M I 0� S. \ . , �I� _ • 1 z•..l l � � 'i'll.�ff}_ .YE ww_l_w MUTT•[s I \ \ L YE-SA ILLE•I . ^ '" z• to fl.N J• 11 T111 'NM - TI czlalPal� -(- B // C.B. A. S D. 298 18 299•. ^ a a.E•r r.Au IP �� iF 1f-fl J1 mei.I " 1\'ti\ / Pater P.1.T.C.T. 1' u L fa At°M .f •w J rLI 1 �y{.�� 1.. ' \ LORfl41NE DRIVE I N 1 �.•• ��� Fsp^,<,pHa \ /// \ LORRAINE COURT' .1 B r S no Ina I -'� V°1 in."r?tE a? / ~21 s I r- ii LT- I M FEET f N46.29'56.E \•'`• / 32 _-J J n 'f I:d'IN IL r I 2 - �` >,�. /•,,, \ • \iiILO�rP�larr iRFf=rl I MI II sera TM on . ame of . _____ _.,..., r t '''' i ,••..,,,,,., 1.1.1/ - II a i I;a�, p' /�/�:*a.a i --SOU-111 CARROLL--AVENUE- 'L;" `�l\4' t a; IN: £ II ' 1 3,+p ,-s.9•: t. w1 1 ...: - _ ,n•u.SB9.11'OS'E-135.1T' �_ 29 r .: .,,,r..s,•-• o t %+t Y :3^ - .. I.- i16 I •o.1 .. '�A 1 s.!d -6 -�'� I_ E35.ER �_j__ \ 4•\ LIT ais VICINITY YW Tg: 1 Lr ..161DT pam lfs. I=�• a^ sl".sE9,M1,..,.`_-'>\ w111..'•r �' v-N -Ti s 14 a UPI 1s•MM°F .01.1m VIM NE NM A'�a. I \+ (1)/ I ^1 i F "�i ,.� ^.••.:"•'".a. TI in `\ ,/-,,,, 4 't NONAR DESwr.rlal It•la__,F.4�.NRonx J1 I H CL .To TOO nIE LITT OF T • r An rNnrM S• Ifi lI I1II�\ Ir,� MIE 'is w bE z.6. 1 swA tk.. ` ti^ O IECODED YM 11 li uKr NSUI AS FIA 2.9 °. IIII I 5 I q'�A p � " I,r•. `I II I \ \\ NCIwI E Lr.'I gN MD FOM FM N P r ESf MFA R LDr 1.RW 6.WR AIIIFS WOIrID.t nc WVND R CREEK f IF ,eI•, a.'7�r�.'rt '� w �in a rswTM E. R[aD(0 IX WIRT A.YIpE 25W.Ml 1ECODS.tAnnwl COMTT. fu5.UIO roINT Al III '. ! • ''���.$ 11"+:a _ BLOCK 6•LOT 1 Ic x 1IIDTH giwl6'-nr UME O SOU1N[4TIIEFfAL eOAFr,D: P ASF_ 2 F*ll .y:.a I 6e ;a I_ ^ Y IC PARNrOfwCATION y, - CAB' A'. SL 2 fn (. WV t,y• �� SW1 E KE \ �R x••Ie'OS'•. DE iAlO Non lIM 6 CMTIN FrAL BBAEVAv A THIS(R 321.11 iEET. 0 N �' ^A.A .+• I': $� \ I IOU 4Ne NE EAir'I AT A MNI Or Lw ro UR L" Iwi of slDw w,Ih IECDFOEB. o r aD FCl {'i'iTM^n. \ 'jG t "'r..< [� 3 wN�rBLOCK 6. Urt \ s O _\\1 I IT O GI C E;SAILLES I VOLUTE 4030.PALE XIII.WTCT: R.SLO.2090 1 E N 'Y E• ON 5110 EAit LIE[A OISTAR R 16901 MI.TO AN.Inr ADD TWO TIN �!" f I -y _lug_��17��j) , ,,..11 t. •^.^ _-_ -�J .P"'•.'< ;� P.R. . . rrxEwxmrKi}I°cw5 u a suo w1IN1 rxAcr. b `-� SIr41 21•D 'I• '•'." Z7iA -- III tIE F •n;V 3. I3N.1 Iu11•uIF R vl0 nlwr TO¢T. IS NNF 6 ITS.W 1E<I.r0 AE3• "� TDs 00' alb. I -- e \ Fo""wo FUrO Ib caN R IN niwt6-ui L I E O x0[A R t D0 D: I ° -� '-i�R Y I= r+ "` Q y TNfR N Wb'OS'r.x«SAID EAST RIGHT.-Nt LIAE A OIfrNNF 6 S.50 F[[r.ro ASF IwA Am.aRo Ix 1 Et '19,N,•-' W _ } O I 1.,t,.• «IFL a.EUIW o THE nlcxr xA9I.c.¢NMx T aI a sE b- AIo.xwlln a Rs.m iEEr.3Lrx A BLOCK 16 -T3- Q'I� 1^ ` I� ....gel., I L UMYID INwl64 xn•1:'S6•f A DISTNNE u x.3.m iLatl JS '" c•.�1 r--. -e " /Y ��4 rUr_INA/ :c(-,../F):(--c. i J °..I• MFR 1n1TKAs(CM1Y.,aD u10<IRVE i0 THE Alwl w NE IFKw O i%.Oz rF[T r0 A•S'1.0111OU FOeD: _ \_\LI•----1 I 9 € _f��_ss-4},. ��Q._t_=._ _ r' LuI•vs n':i •3Ou'F.Eatlwllc Nat sAlo usr=lat .3Ar 1c.DlsrAlrr.•r.s3«Er.l s. n NB9.19'06'W ! L oAD ix" elar6-nr I [RsfnloF a a0 c1w¢ ADiO Aro iuuTH cANMLL ASTMS.wo ro�Fi ti,Ic�ix A rc.REI .. ........... 0 CONTINENTAL BO EVARD -21.1YL' cum T E LET RAVING A CENlnx w¢E a s.'x6i•AND A nwlm a Ll5.00 FEET. # °" ° Y_ �__ PoIMr BEG�1 NG 3O, BS IN A L.0uD WARM s6T•S{'S2Y. •DISINNE 6 E61.M FFE11 • '� `-�' � .G < ^ Fro j r•. P•L o""•eir Tr AT.Sr: . .11EASTf16r ALOE SAM RIGHTa-.CURVE w TALE LEFT w wC LEK.OF.R.11 FEET.1O A6.T. :-A^"r--i-� 2D`'� i---1- 1 Iuw116.LIK61I-�16L 3i DLDfiL--F--1 1z".°•. n00 FN. LOT 1 a r 1r -- _WCREENwrgE11 C} -I• 1 ✓�----Ft---� Tlr- r-I�y-0bfTS klIRTA-L---- f -,- - 01 DER f63 'E.CONTINUING AL.DE SatxniwT6�Ar LINE O SAID SOUTH UM4L OE.1 DatwcE ..,•THE pe-Is� 3•"g I� _ et1�:z." 1 �"Go'".o s/ --' ,. <I t•1.io:S1'I R I N TIE HLINNI a.ONW Io INS•Tar x,INc.¢NIIUL IwnE O... I I i ., i D.L,r - I I .. o T ;; 0 o C TIVIt•AID•RwIUS O b5..FEFI.911N 1 IdG,1 Nwlw Ml'1r'%T. DISH.O 1 .12 go: I m:a SY T. 1 - .a1.Dc I-'•R.<. •° - u.•. I I 1 = ^WARW1 CK GREEN - / II HER 5OU1MAsiEMr.x«suD nib16-OF.CAIRN TO rM A1wT w AnC L[xGm I=IID.sp FEET.TO AV F Il.Rm OINF is coDE•: °'ISt,P. EFSIIIw I 1O / II N CAB. "A" SLIDE iiSO. 5151 L •,,,J . O If?--t-iT-- gzl._A•E•"'CST^ I <'� I I I ,-L _ /\ M 1 l 1 sfa5Lua soD•rm MVO.a 6:..n FEET.TO TIE POINT OF WbI.11N.31D carunx4 I6.bI 16 : ..a..b ;, F%� '°/.(. NA'" AMONTGOMERY LANE 1f` L. \ n BARLON BEND C C 1 L ± iE I v wrn•milt • / 01 - ,. . " aT' s\ \ .. Tf� / n n I z �Do I 1 I�NLY\ =.L{ ,E -1y26 _ * \ \ 11 woo I I1r D 1 1 6. it fF h \ 21 \ III n A I D I al�o.I} 1.,_--1 I II - a " ,. ., - \ \ \\ -C N.I I \ \ Beorin.Owed a1 tt^Dou^' of1Ins of a Trost Ia1U b r•cvPA.o P CURVE DATA :n Mils 0xo165.Po.EA9 B.104 W•3i IETarrint'b•a Can, Team DROSS ACREAGE-16.061 ACRES e.Ec•3A'Ol' R0D DEDICATION FOR 5.CARRELL AVE.-1.077 ACRES Qj R.,IS.Do' PRELIMINARY PLAT _ NEI ACREAGE AFTER DEDICATION-15.041 ACRES 1655317 S0.FT.) L.25G•D2' PN.LSE Pno 05FD E=ISTINc PR9DSEO MMEn' GM53 NET DFxs1TY-g1 �N SPACE LOT 1. BLOCK 1 L.••005.03.56'E LAMO USE z011NG xM1AD IWITs ACRFA4 4REAGE cRoss ARFA EA/z CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION I sCNOLL 'VISES Ri11 N/A 16rar s.OEE N/A AA= TO TIE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE _/CS USES Y/CS USES IAa•• Q/�)\ e-ET 3A'x6' TARRANT COUNTY.AS TEXRECORDED R.635.00' Rl1O n fUO I'VW' S.OAE Bf INL I6.04I ACRES v5 nE[UIDED IN L.SS1's0, 2 SC"mL =/CS USES Y/CS USES 'N/A w Aar•e N/.1 632 ED III 12r=5. AGE ALES LCD.361.56'Sx'E SITUATED IN THE J.W.HALE SURVEY GNVE YOR'L CFRTIF I CAT(DIP L.E61.06' ABSTRACT Alo.e03.'ARRANT COUNT,TEAS I.E0011Store L.REAN..of CIEATHAII 6 ASSOCIATES.0 R•VIeterU Pro0.A•Iano1 LON SVV.,r aI t t Gm...Navirp 1mwm om mew smommcn trom m ocRm1 Evwuym e.f 1•t2'r9' CO propeon Ow r It Nrrr01 Mat 1 tL AO IM ar:Ola point°. points° t NIDA BY w or.•mr m•Irneertion aI••'p trw"ieimla°I�correctly ryr°aw'ia tail° survey L.I 10.50' ONE LOT • LCB.5=3.31.56'E APRIL It.2000 LC•.110.3x' SURVEYOR/RWG/ABPd CASE No.2A 00-C1r ° tYDT �wAAttIAMulr[ NA MEW= LSD j� Fy 2 -.. b v.IN•bialol Land sINN.3•>No.:3ec 1Awuer6n ms 1w1I Iwwe6nt�,Lmu DWI imes sum« 'IsvmAn.msx°a �� APR R ( 2000 "'"' w f.Lmv b+•.swii•'' 1.171 su-eorepro pin Ku-Ps. a IBA Art t ruw T m IIeAIITI ma-e31: MY u11 EwNTH- C GOV.MANS COMM Urn Dun CONTACT: MN CRAFT NEroO REVISED I/ SHEET T 6 1 W P K -1p City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 99-078 PROJECT: Ordinance No.480-338-Second Reading-Rezoning and Revised Site Plan—Carroll High School STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1,Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1 A and 1 A 1 situated in the R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres. A Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School will be considered with this request. PURPOSE: Site Plan required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Natatorium and classroom additions and storage buildings proposed at Carroll High School. LOCATION: On the southeast corner of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and South Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Carroll I.S.D. APPLICANT: Cheatham & Associates CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public and Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fifty-two (52) RESPONSES: Eleven(11)responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Anthony Bologna, 100 Waterford Drive, Southlake, TX opposed, "As property owners, we have serious concerns related to this project; we are opposed to the fact of not strictly complying with the articulation ordinance. We are opposed that the building is taller than allowed by the ordinance. We are opposed to the building being moved 40 ft. to clear the height requirements." • 1C 1 ft -. City of Southiake, Texas (Received May 10, 2000.) • David and Sandra Nuese, 102 Waterford Drive, Southlake, TX, opposed, "The proposed Natatorium does not comply with the articulation ordinance, along with several other concerns stated in the cover letter." See attached letter. (Received May 11, 2000.) • Mary Ann and William Harless, 106 Waterford Drive, Southiake, TX, opposed, "The building is taller than allowed by ordinance. The building being moved 40' to clear height requirements." (Received May 12, 2000.) • Mahmood Rabbani, 104 Waterford Drive, Southiake, TX, opposed, "1. As property owners, we have serious concerns about this project. We are opposed to the fact that it is not complying strictly with the articulated ordinance. 2. We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. 3. We are opposed to the building being moved 40 ft. to clear the height requirements." (Received May 15, 2000.) • Rev. Michael B. Beaugh, Southiake Boulevard Presbyterian Church, PO Box 93164, Southiake, TX, in favor. (Received May 15, 2000.) • David Howell, 1408 Park Place, Southlake, TX, opposed. See attached letter. (Received May 16, 2000.) • Robert E. Finn Jr., 1404 Cambridge Crossing, Southiake, TX, opposed. See attached letter. (Received May 16, 2000.) • Craig and Kathy Rodgers, 108 Waterford Drive, Southiake, TX, opposed, "I would like to see the building moved closer to the school and away from the homes. I would also like to see the turn around moved away from the homes(make it a bull nose turn around.) I would also like to see more landscaping between the building &the homes." (Received May 17, 2000.) • Karen Nyhoff, 1404 Mayfair Place, Southlake, TX opposed, "Please do not remove the trees that are along the homeowner fenceline! We feel the building is too tall and too close to homes. We are concerned with the parking lot turn around area being behind our home. We do not wish to have our yard illuminated any more than it already is by the tennis courts." (Received May 17, 2000.) • Kelly and Jack Kapich, 1402 Mayfair Place, Southiake, TX opposed, "1. Because the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. 2. Opposed to the building being moved 40ft.to clear height requirements. 3. Does not strictly comply with articulation ordinance." (Received May 17, 2000.) • Daniel and Susan George, 1406 Mayfair Place, Southiake, TX opposed, "We are opposed to the fact that the building is taller than allowed by ordinance. We are opposed to the building being r ► City of Southlake, Texas moved 40 ft. to clear the height requirements." (Received May 17, 2000.) One(1)response was received from outside the 200' notification area: • David W. Anderson, 107 Waterford Drive, Southlake, TX, opposed, "Zoning is established to create some uniformity, protect the environment, and to preserve property values. This eyesore accomplishes none of these." (Received May 12,2000.) A petition written by Charles and Vaunda Whitacre, with 26 signatures, was received on May 18, 2000. See attached petition. A petition,in opposition,with 49 signatures was received on May 18, 2000. See attached petition. P&Z ACTION: May 18, 2000; Approved(5-1) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 12, 2000, and subject to the following: • Regarding Item #1 (interior landscaping and bufferyards): The following items are referencing the Landscape Comments Review No. 4, dated May 11, 2000: removing the berms listed as the second #3; regarding #4, not requiring there to be all Mondell Pines and instructing the applicant to work with the Landscape Administrator to determine what canopy trees and accent trees would be most appropriate for the south and east areas; regarding #5, the applicant is to mitigate as required the 2,250 inches and with respect to the placement, diameter, and number of trees defer to the decisions made by the Joint Utilization Committee; regarding#6 (previous Site Plan approval) (the ls`bulleted item) with respect to the trees to be placed along Peytonville Avenue the applicant is to install the remaining trees and shrubs that have not been installed and replace those that are demolished or dead; (the 2nd bulleted item) referring back to the item regarding Mondell Pines; (the 3.d bulleted item) requiring the applicant to do as the Landscape Administrator suggests and place all plantings on the west side of the channel; removing the 4th bulleted item(berm); (the 5`h bulleted item) applicant should note at the time of final inspection for final Certificate of Occupancy all required plant materials will be required to be installed as was approved; (the 6th bulleted item) applicant should meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; regarding Item #7 (high school site landscaping) requiring the applicant to provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance and shall comply with the Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summary Chart that is attached to the Landscape Comments; and regarding Item #8 (Natatorium Site Landscaping) requiring the '1C-3 I ! 1 City of Southiake, Texas applicant to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality trees in their place noting that the undesirable trees consist of China Berry and Mulberry; • allowing no variance on Item #2 and keeping the height of the building at 35'; • regarding Item#3 (screening device) if the residential properties on the east and south sides already have fencing, the school district shall maintain those fences and if there is no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6' or 8' in height, whichever the resident wants; • deleting Item#4.a(articulation); • allowing no variance on Item#4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the building as far west as possible,a minimum of 20', and requiring the applicant to explain to City Council why they absolutely cannot move it any further west; • regarding Item#5 (lighting)requiring the lighting on the east and south sides of the Natatorium building to be nothing but sconces with the lights pointed to the ground and allowing one sconce on either side of each door with a total of six on the east side and two on the south side; • allowing frosted glass on the windows on the east side of the Natatorium; • regarding the accessory buildings, requiring the buildings along the south property line to be moved as far north as possible and the buildings along the east property line to be moved as far west as possible and asking the applicant to completely reassess what it is they need regarding accessory buildings and come back with the absolute minimum(if four are not needed,then do not put in four); approving 30' X 60' and moving each of them a minimum of 50'; requiring that any lighting on the accessory buildings to be sconces with the lights pointed downward and to the interior of the site; • requiring applicant to include all uses on any future Site Plans; • approving the hammerhead turnaround shown on the exhibit tonight and putting the emergency access gate 170' from the east residential properties; • asking applicant to consider moving the Natatorium to the parking area shown in Phase 5 and to explain to City Council why that is not a better site and why it would not work; • and requiring compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION: June 6, 2000; Approved (6-0) First Reading subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, and subject to P&Z's recommendations with the following exceptions: on Item#2, allow the building height as shown; on Item #4.b, allow the 4:1 slope City of Southlake, Texas resulting from the relocation of the Natatorium 16' to the west and acknowledging the school district's commitment to make the following changes discussed this evening: Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the south (Park Place Addition): 1) Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 tol,(4,000 s.f .in size and located south of the multi-purpose building. This location will require additional tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated. 2) Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan and b) additional low canopy trees to screen the shot put area along the fence. 3) School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is currently no fence and will reconstruct the property owner's fence at the southwest corner to be level with his neighbor's fence on the east all the way to Peytonville Ave (resulting in a fence height of 6' to 10'). 4) Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated trees along the east and south of the ball field area and a berm should be constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons being able to look over the fences into neighboring properties. All mitigated trees shall be on 4-inch caliper rather than 3-inch caliper. Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the East (Stone Lakes Addition): 1) Relocated the natatorium an additional 16' to the west and lowered the building eave 2', resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment(from 10' to 4'). 2) Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards. 3) Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block headlights from shining into eastern properties. 4) Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (31/2 to 4- feet tall)with a hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being accessible only to service and emergency vehicles. 5) Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded areas on the plan,existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the bufferyard. 6) School to maintain fencing along the east side as well with the fence on the end being leveled. �1C-5 , ♦ , City of Southiake, Texas 7) Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be down-lighting only as provided by sconces mounted at height of 7'. Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2nd Reading: 1) Landscaping plan and tree mitigation plan for the site with a liberal interpretation of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ball field area and requiring replacement of only trees that can reasonably be placed on this site. 2) Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000. A super-majority (6 out of 7) vote of the City Council will be required for approval of this item due to the opposition within 200' exceeding 20% of the total land area. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-078ZSP.DOC r1C- May 10, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Planning and Zoning Reference No. ZA 99-078 Dear Commissioners: We are the owners of a property directly east of the Carroll High School, adjacent to the proposed location of the Carroll ISD Natatorium. We are opposed to the requested variances to the zoning ordinances, particularly the articulation ordinance. The following is an initial list of concerns, which in no way should be construed to limiting our list of concerns or potential legal actions regarding the proposed structure: 1. Impact on our property value 2. Size and height of the Natatorium 3. Landscaping or other plans to screen the Natatorium from our property 4. Plans for proper water drainage 5. Lighting plans 6. Facility open/closed hours 7. Alternatives considered for building site and size 8. Construction schedule 9. Noise level during construction and during operation of the facility We are confident that the Commission will continue Southlake's tradition of respecting homeowner's concerns. Thank you for this opportunity to voice our concerns. We also request direct notification of all further correspondence regarding this request. Sincerely, r‘1U ' /! 'tip', `ri'r4� David & Sandra Nuese Owners, 102 Waterford Drive Lot 2, Block 7 of Stone Lakes C: Robert Walker, SPIN Representative 16 Ted Gillum, CISD John Craft, CISD Mark Daniels, TPM RECD MAY 112000 • Lori Farwell )m: Ken Baker nt: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 1:30 PM v: Lori Farwell Subject: FW: Plat Revision Request- Carroll High School Addition Importance: High Below is a letter I received concerning the Carroll High School project. ----Original Message From: Howell,David[SMTP:David.Howell@FMR.COM] Sent: Tuesday,May 16,2000 10:39 AM To: 'kbaker@cityofsouthlake.com' Cc: 'jinxhowell@aol.com' Subject: Plat Revision Request-Carroll High School Addition Importance: High Hello Ken: Here is a summary of our discussion: I am OPPOSED TO the Revision Request. Specifically and exclusively to the Accessory Building that backs up to the south property line behind Park Place street residences. I am purchasing a home on Lot 27 1408 Park Place which backs up to the south property line. I strongly feel that the Accessory building could be placed on another part of CISD Property that would be less visible to Park Place residences. Preferably to the North and FAst directly between the Softball Field and Baseball field. Already, there mature tree line along the east property line. Either way, additional monies should be spent toward landscaping trees along the southern property line. Given the total budget for the planned expenditures, allowances for more trees and larger trees would be minimal and is the right thing to do for CISD neighbors to the south. In addition, the initial proposed berm should be reconsidered (allowing for potential flooding problems)to elevate the tree line. My opinion is that Park Place residences would benefit from greater privacy rather than less. Thank you, David Howell Phone: 972-584-7750 Email: David.Howell@FMR.Com Pager: DavidHowell@BellsouthlPS.Com EGD MAY 1 6 2000 1C-g + • y May 15,2000 Planning&Zoning Commission City of Southlake,Texas Reference number:ZA 99-078 I am opposed to the request for the following reasons: When the project to install the Softball Field and Activity Center was presented to the residents located on Park Place and Cambridge Crossing we were assured that the project included adequate landscaping so as to obstruct the unpleasant view inherent with these types of structures.While researching the most recent rezoning request,ZA 99-078,we discovered that the promised landscaping has been removed from the site plan per city instructions.The proposed 12 foot high and 95 foot long building will be in clear view of properties located along Park Place and Cambridge Crossing.If the rezoning is allowed to pass my family as well as others will be forced to endure further aesthetic unpleasantness. The only acceptable solutions are to insist that the promised landscaping behind our property be installed, or relocate the proposed building to another area on the school property that is non intrusive to the residents along Park Place and Cambridge Crossing. I respectively request that the rezoning request be denied,and that the Planning and Zoning Commission conduct further inquires regarding the recent elimination of previously approved landscaping that was to be located along the East and South fence line of the Carroll High School property. Yours truly, /)44 — Robert E.Finn Jr. 1404 Cambridge Crossing Southlake Texas 76092 Phone: 817-421-6275 '1C-q i I i r May- 18-00 09 : 16A P.02 1 1 • ,_ i tif 1 • 8 20130 May 8, 1999 OFFICE CF CITY SECRETARY QC__• Cow1/4PtbkL55-C.Dv\ Dr. Ted Gillum, Superintendent , Carroll Independent School District 1201 N. Carroll Avenue C c ` Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Dr. Gillum: This letter is regarding the new aquatics center which will be built on the property between Carroll High School and Stone Lakes subdivision. We notice that clearing of the lot has already begun, so we hope you will give this your immediate attention. As residents of Stone Lakes and property owners whose lot backs up directly to the proposed site, we have several concerns which we would appreciate your addressing: 1. Existing Trees, - There are several large trees on the property now which are close to the Stone Lakes fence. They provide a shield from the school and the tennis court lights. We would ask that you leave these trees in place. 2. Berm and New Trees - We would request that CISD plant new "trees" in a raised berm along the Stone Lakes fence to provide a barrier between our lots and the new facility. The two-story aquatics center is going to be so close to our property that large trees should be planted to begin with. It would be nice if these could be planted before the projected completion date of 2001, so they could be growing during the construction period. 3. Lighting- This is a particularly important concern to us as we currently deal with the bright tennis court lights. We do not want to see any more lights from our backyards. Even though we understand that you plan to put the parking on the school side of the facility, we do not want high, gooseneck lights used that will be visible from our property. Please consider low, minimal lighting. 4. Windows - Since the facility will be so close to our backyards, we obviously do not want any windows looking onto our property. Pale t oe1-1 REC'D MAY 16Z000 1C-ID NYay-'1 S-00 09: 16A P. 03 There are ten homes in our subdivision that directly back up to the aquatics center. Many more homes are involved when you consider that those homeowners will look out their front doors and see this huge brick complex. We all have a lot invested in our homes, and we would like to see our investment continue to increase. If the concerns in this letter are not properly addressed, your facility could have a devaluing effect on our property. We solicit your assistance in seeing that our home values are protected. We would personally be glad to meet with you to discuss these concerns or to assist you in any way. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Charles & Vaunda Whitacre 110 Waterford Drive Southlake, TX 76092 817-488-2034 cc: CISD Board of Trustees Rex Potter (Stone Lakes resident) Pie 2- 1.4 tl\ ' May21 E-00 09: 16A P.04 As homeowners and residents of Stone Lakes, we share the concerns expressed in the attached letter dated 5/8/99 from Charles & Vaunda Whi tacre c- n Sie une t Printed Name& Address kc%/:711 .P ==i=, -c_9(-- rK r ll kr)C I_t lThi.i ( _4E_,.64•,(47_ x�i�, 1,71 ..4A e_ /4'4 n7<l ,e64 6,c x'_�...___'J' 1 k 7eit'Ao, 'A /3 . l k, / Aii,, ,,, A,y P ) 3 r' 1 3 tci vim'/iiJ J .111: 31 A,r, 4 �/ Poe. 51,i-0 ,.�f(1 6 k,,1.,4;1.„k,:,, ,_ _ ` 2(J iI „lt t-L A ))t ,;.)r 1 f i Kf i / ' . , e,,,,,„,„,,i 4---,iie.„,)..4 ,2z)z4i,m,- ,f.i.,-c ___,:" . .. /(. ,., . .Ar6ciet,• 0i,C-(A-siiii) A;'fv6-- .Z6 I fiLiur/4 Ay ci\,.\e).\6\kl -Ac, 109 W A-.0.- -t) N liAli 0,1/4„, ._,, ,-,- , %N. 4,,,,,,,, \hob ‘\ 14NIAMI A, F, ci__. i,g,,, _,. /iiikr.,2 ,41; ) C--)/"A7a./t) ,e_v5,14741:-//./1/21, I: tl. MiCieCIP 1 ,C)1814 lb_ IN_WaorDc . Syr 6fD<-14cY OIVIN,1 C1 1qAYfi9i4 h4c4 /.4,ALU6.Al L i-[..(1rk5i lot, 0114)4 UR , gy4h44idet6 /al kji*1 0 V 42 ir6:2 .0.--re------__‘,3,0-.,/,- 0 ,i/y7,4,./...4 LAX)/ .-4V1011 '/' I9Cty a'r 14 1C i2. ' May116-00 09: 16A P.05 As 1 omeowners and residents of Stone Lakes,we share the concerns expi tssed in the attached letter dated 5/8/99 from Charles & Vaunda Whi:acre. Sienatvre Printed Name&Address A Wikr TA ov • 140D PilArFA,A gPlAndLt Ti I" • i4o-s MAN hail:- Pi- :S115-4.17AV -51,i,5.4(1 .,,,D1(leletlle' I 4-06 Ftt ticc. 5 1,14):47 1)7)neicly ofyLvi f)v)r _0 -(30,10.7v 2 1.4) de -Pr (-• "7-44/16.-q- ) CULrelre (-3 1) 7-17Ziato8pv-- _,/ OD kAlakApaizzL I?)) cpc.if7 Pk? Pale 1C-I3 ' r a r -A--' 6,,,,tt, at_ it,,', ,,,-„t4.__- _ atlz) -,,/,..,t- 1 . .„(,,,,,4 t.,,Aei The following homeowners are opposed to any zoning or plat changes to'the property at Carroll High School that would result in more trees being removed from the south of the property and/or the construction of`accessory' building(s) close to the Park Place property lines as shown in the proposed drawing. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 4. /�. .CI _..j r * / L , ' ' AO ta.i/k kieJL, :2157-1 4 1400 4. ici-) z g--e rea ti______4(2_1':_°_741: _ * ,f.24%. i ' t-e________________Af-;V___Ad -3Z/Z).Z72 7 77 7 ' 1 - i ---- ' - —7--)---- ,_:59:,,c, (----,-,f4_1,4.,_EiLL11.,_______,D___L-_,,,,LL _.,,,,,:),,i__ -.,....L.„ _ __________I '1/7_ PL.L.11,_.../"_Lcii..._ " 1 , 3 P ,,,i-e__ PA., d_ c/— 90 cf 7 -=- __-it---- ---____� `� ____-------------------_—`�_--------------- Ill_k, ..../ 0 ,,,,,„„ /v0310a.,4, 8‘,6, '-i -V- 90 y7 /4/ q A-tzic fiA-Lc. .14-2 . ,4,„. ..�„,,,. L,a e-� °- '+2--l-7 S , 4_ 4 L -t. ------------ I 4-6.:paid, 'lac . 4(1-e 3. ___zie:v2-4-__4c,,___ _ 7/4-14g-4=7, -7\- ?IL/if- ' di' !,,,,,'(, P,,./.. @ , , ,..... 3.-- 2.:'/(t!1,1" *— 1)4111 1.. i ) ___________0(it: tkolk ,I(/ !, ( 1 .-0--:Y6S.ti' '' '' 7/7/1/ 7"-.1 i liq -.71-(.1-- 4 . 1-1„,i,, --- ..--- --, f-,, -.1., * (..:.: A _ c,,, , _ / Lk ] fiAvir Ptc '; _)---.74,wy----,) --- G n j40. 1 7 -t rc �` l ee 4-24 r5�''V I eIDCq 1C-14 RECD MAY 1 ii 2000 The following homeowners are opposed to any zoning or plat changes to the property at Carroll High School that would result in more trees being removed from the south of the property and/or the construction of`accessory' buildings)close to the Park Place property lines as shown in the proposed drawing. NAME ADDRESS PHONE af 14.e144,„ NA4- 1 if•4441 / /8 Qaci_ 46, -"A' A. ss�� CaLbt4A.) ND/e, 1 k J•09eto ,b if/act Lig t-gki i5 t, _ea I hi& eatiuR ��.4,,e4 _ 4- 1�� z PrK 'lace __Y1D-L= c 1C-'5 , r The following homeowners are opposed to any zoning or plat changes to the property at Carroll High School that would result in more trees being removed from the south of the property and/or the construction of`accessory' building(s) close to the Park Place property lines as shown in the proposed drawing. NAME ADDRESS PHONE ,i,.A, s j46 X a" . 't( ,P.../G - - I F4 3 5 Y: 7 'i3O.,� L 4.lc\ ,SAL4_--- ,1 t.2,; Lc-LCt 4 GA S lg ":)(1---11% 6,-,/ -.7,,,,i,z,,,,-.,., cr,,,e-- ‘//d, (P3---p _ 6 i/ RrR- f/°c e C L t/F6 \ __ ((((/// __--__- — gti ' -1% i, Via? 8(7 \ .+w1s_ e j_ dries _ ri (o,► (004 k ok ,--------3 -4 )-- , Tf.,& ' (...: 1 1,,_7:,,fze,/, -;.--5_,________-_11:7:(-_-z35:k --,--)-\)-\\--c‘c A - (-V --te/ l o4 akdiAk /2/c4 e7. ___y/ _ Q 3 5 T ,ate &cA/* _i <_w ci i i '---1/ / ' '''' A17: ‘4) / 4 6'' t(‘ie I Z Li/ f7- C)8). e_ V , izi:21, _______LLc: 13e,,a re4114 7 _ _.____9 ,;_,Z.Y.i.__, _e___ c3: 2 - ' '1 ' ' V AW ' I ) -‘.C-..-:- 14 ef-6.k(' ,,,7 o f � r - f ‘*. t - r � , , :, , % -it t , 7 1C-1 1p REM) MAY 1 6 2000 The following homeowners are opposed to any zoning or plat changes to the property at Carroll High School that would result in more trees being removed from the south of the property and/or the construction of`accessory' building(s)close to the Park Place property lines as shown in the proposed drawing. NAME ADDRESS PHONE ___zak. _,.. �_ :,,-)----,A.2_,„____ __ (ma ._L t .,Qx l-c- o --, i • -- ____2: .. _____--.1_2'__-_________61 ...11- 41,...- .,22/_::-.ekV Lo_i b t-ii"0,211C. ( 121-000$ 7 � lW--{C_7�:\ w�" 1.. Lt )--�.I z `^ir3����.7c KR._��J _1...-- --- � // 9 1GIl I f I Tract Map ZA99-078 . `-,` . .401 rice' ; . ► • - t. ,, , , alp I. �, • 1 I I 4�� 4*Qii�'"ice §4ia►� �' rf.. �� 1 1 vaiery I I1L• 0►� m 1 t mmia:iii A;114'41! 0411011116.;"1- ■ r� oft•est4•�a .ri 1��� �� 1. bride Pili I J JOHNEONI �• c. • Is, phr!...par:* _ ail : a [ 1 I Ill SOUTHLAKE i•-i& b. ■ AP: .....,,,,k ,,.,, . It - my 0 coisTextif . ITI atitinagg 1..1,0,( ES -IIIIIMIIIINTP .OtV1--2 M Ogg%2 ' ____ig \ ?.____ II NMI .< •• lat-7.,4,•,•44,,t444420isrlitsviiiir dt.iv akI , ■■ ■ri' �rme■■i� hold! a � •/ti.Ill j. wgf / - - ■■■■■■■■6. rbra t III i■ �c z I■ ■■t ti I ♦ , i.►ems' r■:i �MICFAFI _— ` I �,� \!,�•Ic Li■� �� :�TOfi IiA j lii 2000 0 2000 Feet N /_ W / E S lC-1$ r Surrounding Property Owners ZA99-078 ,.,,,,,,,,t,, 1 L Mk. :- .., �-- 6 6 7 1 2 3 i 4 0 . i. \ ------41.11111115111116 par ImoRau it! 1111111110, 06. imm alvik,,, "V,11,�� 51 wait, mph win drsItimp re A ATI Sr IP-,a �m d woo mis gm IN um 47 �i IIII III Ng Gith _.arm ' ,42 41 : :i'��ii'�� Veil I h 011 ollik �NM Mt �14IP ��it)...41/0�� gig ■�, ,li. ♦1I rillg,PRP ■■• WI. r � ,��►•4' Property Owner Zonin Land Use Designation Acreage 1. Myers Meadow 1. "R-PUD" 1. Medium Density Residential 1. 4.95 acres Homeowner's Assn. 2. Farmer Madison Turner I 2. "C-3" 2. Retail Commercial 2. 1.08 acres 3. Southlake Safeco Ltd. 3. "C-3" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 1.37 acres 4. Southlake 114 Investors 4. "C-3" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 0.85 acres 5. Southlake Blvd Presbyterian 5. "CS" 5. Retail Commercial 5. 5.17 acres Church 6. Realty Income Texas Prop.LP6. "C-3" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 1.13 acres 7. Southridge Lakes 7. "C-3" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 3.32 acres Homeowner's Assn. 8. A.Bologna 8. "R-PUD" 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.59 acres 9. S.Morningstar(TAD records) 9. "R-PUD" 9. Medium Density Residential 9. 0.35 acres D.Nuese(new owner) 10.M. Rabbani 10. "R-PUD" 10.Medium Density Residential 10.0.43 acres 11.W.Harless 11."R-PUD" 11.Medium Density Residential 11.0.39 acres 12. C.Rodgers 12."R-PUD" 12.Medium Density Residential 12.0.39 acres 13. C.Whitacre 13."R-PUD" 13.Medium Density Residential 13.0.38 acres 14.A.Jain 14."R-PUD" 14.Medium Density Residential 14.0.38 acres 15.J.Kapich 15. "R-PUD" 15.Medium Density Residential 15. 0.35 acres 16.D.Nyhoff 16. "R-PUD" 16. Medium Density Residential 16.0.36 acres 17.D.George 17. "R-PUD" 17.Medium Density Residential 17.0.53 acres Page 1 of 2 1C-n Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 18.C. Williams 18. "R-PUD" 18.Medium Density Residential 18.0.57 acres 19.L.Giglio 19."R-PUD" 19.Medium Density Residential 19.0.40 acres 20.E.Walter 20."R-PUD" 20. Medium Density Residential 20.0.33 acres 21. R. Dahlson 21. "R-PUD" 21.Medium Density Residential 21.0.44 acres 22. S.Tarrant 22."R-PUD" 22.Medium Density Residential 22.0.54 acres 23.D.Bennett 23."R-PUD" 23. Medium Density Residential 23.0.43 acres 24.J. Henson 24."R-PUD" 24. Medium Density Residential 24.0.39 acres 25.T.Evans 25. "R-PUD" 25. Medium Density Residential 25.0.31 acres 26.D.Webb 26."R-PUD" 26. Medium Density Residential 26.0.52 acres 27.J.Johanson 27."R-PUD" 27. Medium Density Residential 27.0.55 acres 28. S.Roberts 28."R-PUD" 28. Medium Density Residential 28.0.56 acres 29. M. Burz 29. "R-PUD" 29. Medium Density Residential 29.0.36 acres 30.E.Armstrong 30."R-PUD" 30.Medium Density Residential 30.0.73 acres 31.R.Finn 31."R-PUD" 31. Medium Density Residential 31.0.42 acres 32.H.Bush 32. "R-PUD" 32. Medium Density Residential 32.0.33 acres 33.K. Sietz 33."SF-20A" 33.Medium Density Residential 33.0.61 acres 34.K. Swieter 34."SF-20A" 34.Medium Density Residential 34.0.46 acres 35. S.Reindl 35."SF-20A" 35. Medium Density Residential 35.0.46 acres 36.Randy Bollig Builder(TAD) 36. "SF-20A" 36.Medium Density Residential 36.0.46 acres R.Nall(new owner) 37.Pence Enterprises Inc. (TAD) 37."SF-20A" 37.Medium Density Residential 37.0.46 acres D.Howell(new owner) 38.T.Burns 38."SF-20A" 38. Medium Density Residential 38.0.46 acres 39. S. Little 39. "SF-20A" 39.Medium Density Residential 39.0.46 acres 40. C.Vanyo 40. "SF-20A" 40.Medium Density Residential 40.0.46 acres 41. S. Kolar 41."SF-20A" 41. Medium Density Residential 41.0.46 acres 42.G.Middleton 42."SF-20A" 42. Medium Density Residential 42.0.46 acres 43.Dynasty Custom Homes(TAD)43."SF-20A" 43.Medium Density Residential 43.0.47 acres D. Rogers(new owner) 44. W. Castro 44."SF-20A" 44.Medium Density Residential 44.0.53 acres 45. Southlake Woods,LP 45."SF-20A" 45. Medium Density Residential 45.0.47 acres 46. Southlake Woods,LP 46."SF-20A" 46. Medium Density Residential 46.0.22 acres 47. Southlake Woods,LP 47. "SF-20A" 47.Medium Density Residential 47.0.48 acres 48. Southlake Woods,LP 48."SF-20A" 48.Medium Density Residential 48.0.48 acres 49. Southlake Woods,LP 49."SF-20A" 49. Medium Density Residential 49.0.73 acres 50.C.May 50."AG" 50. Medium Density Residential 50. 1.01 acres 51.L.Akard 51."AG" 51. Medium Density Residential 51. 1.06 acres 52.C.Akard 52. "AG" 52.Medium Density Residential 52.2.06 acres 53.R.Greenwood 53."AG" 53.Medium Density Residential 53. 1.00 acres 54.D.Davis 54."AG" 54.Medium Density Residential 54. 1.00 acres 55.C.Lam 55."C-2" 55.Retail Commercial 55.0.69 acres 56. C.Lam 56."C-2" 56.Retail Commercial 56. 1.31 acres 57. C.Lam 57. "C-2" 57.Retail Commercial 57. 1.80 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\99Exhibits\99078SP.doc Page 2 of 2 1C•2O _J .r-T yrs ram 9_ �i ~ era's$=- 111BISAt o 'er -- - - li . ,.....y • o ''oe• 1-k «..m«....,' _.�.yj ZONE ,i•,ry s-w'x,ni/NN\ • r \ .,r Sat.m,.rm;..«r.r.. I I .....— -a•Tr- .rxm. r i -__-.._e-_9. - �. - (P.1 Wiz;• •r--%-r=__ i • n .v..wry L .ruc. • I' I �F J�/'1Ii�� _4 - r— 'I COMIC • t , r. :s r....r a«..,.,,. =R W •1 m•,nr v-sv.mExr I =; ,1[ _ -- - - = rim i. i. , rm.. .»+„n y_ N CC 1 s .Paw.xr,wr I i !- 4`�`�_�. �- ,s- I .�'F;T•-.i.._...---_. rm. 11J • > mlu,5.11..c i i .• jr. e: .R.Ice`eae ..r«,.«•1.,.,, J Occcc .I .I it •• �•�0 =r. I q L. - E>e.TNn r ,« «,xa,=.mil re.. - .---.mot-e�:_s i T• J r --, - N.ALIICE YiaD 3"AKLw I . , , ' /. Ypy��r��,}- S `. • j `. I r . III 111 !1 '1 rl li' �•-_..---._.-- .. J'� .n,n.« x r>.aa.sr.µ +iw.l a l .NDR U ! ! I u 1 `'c.'rr, . 'u I 1 PRACMURK...LB • : �«1, I II, REFER SNEET 1.3 1 !1 i - T Y'9 __,ene L`!1 n'iiUZ/ •--` uE" SWISS y - I i REFER SI-E=1 1.3 S _ /- FLAIR. hi .., �{ • m au.... lv v ! 1 % T . (. y Y M MYIt..:li..NO. i it * I • Ili ; L�,.a-.I, a .. . _ —�! /�•�_—�Nar, _ I LEGEND �'i, !. — _ _ � 1 Ir I' I I 1 eorn.Au I I I —_ ,,.",'v �� .ki. _ $ ® _ _ ` ! �,....I'Il �i �� �xL.m .w ,x... RFCO SE= 2:1 1 -. �i; {i- _ _ice K- __ z =I - _ _W 1 j I� II!I 'ill!!!!!), Iy i ii ) ...r�Y... b. KEY • - _ _ r 3 -_ I _ ,�� -.r..r.... PLAN 1.1 .1- '_— `-'_i_ Y� - - — -�......+... ^�""=i•frl•etv rw 1lrt..._ �=.r -- I t-'=E_Y 1= :I NOTE: -- „,,,, ,=_ .-+ _ - _- - THIS PIJI �-- • '«m'` T. HAS BEE 1 I 1 ; r _ar- ! Pt.YY r-i3T - - ' lTi4. r. ■� 3 l l=� REVISED a'MsT I < r:� -s7 • HANDICAP PARKINfa DETAIL REFLECT ,,wm� 3E lip o. 3C 3C I 3C2 3C2A r_- I 3A1 - --_-- CURREN �1\`exs GAOL? � o ND " I I ..... ma...............k FUTURE ! �� „, "-� ^ CHANGE m1 WE'RE. I rk■sc c os R�c.r 11�Y STATE:DD ..... '2D N. x 2.. •1 r Li,.w tot Lou �'/o,"4.runs 1574 SDU N M v. 1 1`-' 1 :STOP uRRDu Nloe.SCHOOL ADDITION I■a sIR AMATEDI.IRE E ,,,«u„cc .. ; ■- R.J.PADEN SINYET ABSTRACT NO.I= ... 1'' n«:us:rr m Y-..r....was 14 L J m Vw-'i.�c TnRRA« ,roux .1.2 MA C OIW WM WY 1w> CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL-MASTER SITE PLAN HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL r- HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL xlx.erx G 1 ------------ 1 - I. aY_ CASE#2A97-108 so xws[R PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN 0 09:02 FROM TOTAL PROGRAM MGMT TO 4B893?0 P.02 • • • May 11, 2000 "0":"; Mr. Ken Baker, City of Southlake 1721 E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake,TX 76092 Total Program RE: Re-Zoning of Carroll High School—Case ZA 00-006 Management, Inc. Dear Ken, 860 W.Airport Frwy. Please remove the item indicating lighting at the baseball fields. The district does not S°"`1ti1 intend to address this item. We are not prepared with any information pertaining to the Hurst,TX 76054 design of this item and do not intend to present baseball field lights to the Planning and 42 (817)427-7.47 Zoning Board for approval. fax(817)427.4708 www.total.pm.com Thank you for you attention to this matter. Regards. 77_,„,/{j- Mark J Daniels,A A, CSI, CCCA Program Manager Cc: Ted Gillum, CISD John Craft,CISD Brent Kline, TPM i . • Eddie Cheatham, Cheatham and Assoc. • t .. . i Austin,TX Fort Worth,TX Houston,TX RECD MAY 1-1 21,10 Memo To: Dennis Kilough From:Brent Kline -TPM Date: 06/01/00 Re: Modifications made to the Site Plan Submittal for the Carroll High School Site &Addition of a new Aquatics Center Dennis We wanted to detail out all the modifications to the original submittal to make a clear as possible. Between the P&Z Committee Meeting and this submittal the following meetings occurred. 1. Meeting with the Architects & Engineers to discuss the possible modifications to the Aquatic Centers Plans. 2. After the plans were modified, they were presented to the School Board for approval to go forward. 3. Then a meeting was set up with the neighbors to the east of the Aquatics Center 4. A meeting of the Landscape Committee (part of the Joint Use Committee) to discuss the project which also included one neighbor from Stone Lakes. 5. Finally on Tuesday the 30th we met with neighbors to the south on the High School (Park Place). We wanted you to know the process, and the reason the landscape plans are not up todate. RECD JUN 012000 •Page 1 1C-23 The following are the modifications that have been agreed to. In the Northeast Corner of property surrounding the Aquatics Center. • The Aquatics Center was moved 16 feet to the West. This reduced the distance above the 4:1 slope barrier by 4 feet. • Due to the move the parking space that were located west of the building were relocated to the south of the building, off of the drive to the hammer-head fire lane access. It was agree to have the parking spaces moved as far to the south along that drive as possible. This has been shown on the newest site plan. • A breakaway chain will be located at the East End of the parking spaces across the drive to restrict access to the mechanical yard & hammer-head area. • The shrubs that were required in the East & South bufferyards will be placed in a row around the East and South ends of the hammer-head to block head lights from car pulling into the lot. • Light on the East Side of the building will be performed with wall sconces on both sides of the exit doors, and in the mechanical yard. These lights are to project light down onto the ground only. • Light of the parking lot will be handled with 6 to 8 bollard type lights (3 to 4 feet tall), surrounding the lot. • The landscaping on the East& South boundaries will use as many of the existing trees as possible (those located immediately adjacent to the east property line). The remainder of the area will be have a variety of trees in a triangulated pattern in a minimum of two rows. The types of trees are to be a combination of screening trees, and long growth canopy trees. The determination of the final mixture to be accomplished by the Landscape Committee and Keith Martin. • Page 2 1C-1A R . In the Southern Half of the Site. • The landscaping on the East & South boundaries will use as many of the existing trees as possible (those located immediately adjacent to the east property line). The remainder of the area will be have a variety of trees in a triangulated pattern in a minimum of two rows. The types of trees are to be a combination of screening trees, and long growth canopy trees. The determination of the final mixture to be accomplished by the Landscape Committee and Keith Martin. • A series of trees on the south side of the softball field will be planted on top of a berm with bushes at their bases to screen the scoreboard and foul ball pole. Similar tree plantings will occur on the East Side of the field but without the berm due to drainage concerns. • The area between the neighbors and the shot put pads will have the two rows of trees planted there also, where possible. The installation of a series of bushes (bufferyard bushes) which are design to deter students from congregating by the fence. • The number and location of storage buildings has been changed from four to one. The one building will be located south of the new Activity Building and associated drainage way (nestled in the trees), and is to be 40' x 100'. The building will have wall sconce lights installed on all four sides. • Rebuilding of a wood fence for the last home site to the west along Park Place to provide better screening of the field. General Modifications or Agreements • All Mitigation trees planted along the property lines will be of 4" caliper. • The School District will repair any of the existing fences, and will fill in any areas, which do not have fences presently with fences, which blend in with adjacent fences. The School District has agreed to maintain the fences. We will attempt to update the landscaping plans by the end of the day to day but will commit to have the updated plans at the City Council Meeting. • Page 3 7C.25 City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 99-078 Review No: Five Date of Review: 6/02/00 Project Name: Revised Site Plan - Carroll High School, Carroll High School Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 and Tract 1 A & 1 A 1 of the J. L. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 348 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Carroll I.S.D. Total Program Management 1201 N. Carroll Avenue 128 E. Texas Street Southlake, TX 76092 Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone:(817) 416-1420 Phone : (817) 488-7732 Fax:(817) 251-6622 Fax: (817)488-9708 Attn: M. J. Daniels CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/31/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER at(817)481-5581,EXT.753. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 4 Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 4 Building Articulation Y See Comment No. 4A and Attached Chart Masonry Standards Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 1 Interior Landscape Y See Comment No. 1 and Attached Chart Driveways Y In compliance with previously approved plan Lighting Y See Comment No. 5 1. Provide the "required" interior landscape and bufferyards shown on the attached chart. The landscape plan shall meet all bufferyard and interior landscape requirements. Also, refer to Memorandum from Malcolm Jackson, Chief of Building Services, dated June 1, 2000. 2. In the "CS" Community Service District, no building shall exceed thirty-five (35) feet. Portions of the Natatorium building are indicated on the elevation plan to be thirty-eight (38) feet in height (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: allowing no variance on Item #2 and keeping the height of the building at 35'). Note: Elevation plans dated May 31, 2000 indicate portions of the natatorium building exceed 35'. 1 rjC 2i, k a • r City of Southlake, Texas 3. The following change is needed in regards to screening of residential property. • Ordinance 480, Section 39.4 (b) - Where a non-residential use abuts a residential lot or dwelling, a screening device shall be erected along the side or the rear property lines abutting said residential lot or dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet. The site summary chart and the site plan indicates a six (6) foot wood screening fence on the east property line and a six (6) foot screening fence on the south property line (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: The school district shall maintain those fences and if there is no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6'or 8'in height, whichever the resident wants). 4. The following are comments in regards to residential adjacency/corridor overlay: a. Ordinance 480, Section 43.13 (d) - On all facades vertical and horizontal articulation must be met. The Natatorium does not meet vertical or horizontal articulation requirements. Please refer to attached articulation chart. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: Allow as shown). The future classrooms located on the north side of the main school building do not meet Articulation. Please note that these additions are compliant with previous site plan approval. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: Allow as shown). Note: The May 31, 2000 site plan submittal indicates a 40' x 100' future accessory building located just north of practice field #3. This accessory building is not subject to horizontal and vertical articulation requirements due to the building not being visible from Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and being greater than 400' from the southern property line. b. Ordinance 480, Section 43.13(h)- Setbacks/Yards-No non-single family residential building may encroach the area above a line having a 4:1 slope from any single family residential. The portion of the building facing the east property line does not meet the 4:1 slope. The Natatorium appears to encroach the 4:1 slope by 4' 6". (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 5/18/00: allowing no variance on Item #4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the building as far west as possible, a minimum of 20, and requiring the applicant to explain to City Council why they absolutely cannot move it any further west). Note: The applicant's May 31, 2000 site plan submittal indicates that the Natatorium has been relocated 16' to the west from the previous site plan. This reduced the 4:1 slope barrier from 10' feet to 4' 6". Due to the relocation of the building to the west, the parking spaces previously located on the western end of the building were moved to the southern end of the building. 5. All exterior lighting shall comply with Lighting Ordinance 693-B. A photometric lighting plan and cut-sheet has not been provided to the City at this time. 6. The applicant is requested to remove the berms and the Mondell Pines notation from the site plan as agreed to at the May18, 2000 Planning and Zoning meeting. It has been noted by City Engineer that the berms in this location would result in drainage problems for residents to the south and the Landscape Administrator feels that the use of the single plant type could have a negative impact on the site. 2 /1 .1 City of Southlake, Texas P&Z Action: May 18, 2000; Approved(5-1) subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 12, 2000, and subject to the following: • Regarding Item #1 (interior landscaping and bufferyards) and referencing Landscape Comments Review No. 4, dated May 11, 2000: removing the berms listed as the second#3; regarding#4, not requiring there to be all Mondell Pines and instructing the applicant to work with the Landscape Administrator to determine what canopy trees and accent trees would be most appropriate for the south and east areas; regarding#5, the applicant is to mitigate as required the 2,250 inches and with respect to the placement, diameter, and number of trees defer to the decisions made by the Joint Utilization Committee; regarding #6 (previous Site Plan approval) (the 1st bulleted item) with respect to the trees to be placed along Peytonville Avenue the applicant is to install the remaining trees and shrubs that have not been installed and replace those that are demolished or dead; (the 2nd bulleted item) referring back to the item regarding Mondell Pines; (the 3rd bulleted item) requiring the applicant to do as the Landscape Administrator suggests and place all plantings on the west side of the channel; removing the 4th bulleted item (berm); (the 5th bulleted item) applicant should note at the time of final inspection for final Certificate of Occupancy all required plant materials will be required to be installed as was approved; (the 6th bulleted item) applicant should meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; regarding Item #7 (high school site landscaping) requiring the applicant to provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance and shall comply with the Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summary Chart that is attached to the Landscape Comments; and regarding Item #8 (Natatorium Site Landscaping) requiring the applicant to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality trees in their place noting that the undesirable trees consist of China Berry and Mulberry; • allowing no variance on Item #2 and keeping the height of the building at 35'; • regarding Item #3 (screening device) if the residential properties on the east and south sides already have fencing, the school district shall maintain those fences and if there is no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6'or 8'in height, whichever the resident wants; • deleting Item #4.a (articulation); • allowing no variance on Item #4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the building as far west as possible, a minimum of 20', and requiring the applicant to explain to City Council why they absolutely cannot move it any further west; • regarding Item #5 (lighting) requiring the lighting on the east and south sides of the Natatorium building to be nothing but sconces with the lights pointed to the ground and allowing one sconce on either side of each door with a total of six on the east side and two on the south side; • allowing frosted glass on the windows on the east side of the Natatorium; • regarding the accessory buildings, requiring the buildings along the south property line to be moved as far north as possible and the buildings along the east property line to be moved as far west as possible and asking the applicant to completely reassess what it is they need regarding accessory buildings and come back with the absolute minimum (iffour are not needed, then do not put in four); approving 30'X 60'and moving each of them a minimum of 50'; requiring that any lighting on the accessory buildings to be sconces with the lights pointed downward and to the interior of the site; • requiring applicant to include all uses on any future Site Plans; • approving the hammerhead turnaround shown on the exhibit tonight and putting the emergency access gate 170'from the east residential properties; • asking applicant to consider moving the Natatorium to the parking area shown in Phase 5 and to explain 3 City of Southlake, Texas to City Council why that is not a better site and why it would not work; • and requiring compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. City Council Action: June 6, 2000;Approved(6-0)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated 6/2/00, subject to P&Z's recommendations with the following exceptions: on Item 2, allowing the building height as shown; Item 4b, allowing the 4:1 slope resulting from the relocation of the natatorium 16' to the West and acknowledging the school district's commitment to make the following changes discussed this evening: Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the south (Park Place Addition): • Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 to ,(4,000 sf.in size and located south of the multi- purpose building). This location will require additional tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated. • Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan and b) additional low canopy trees to screen the shot put area along the fence. • School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is currently no fence and will reconstruct the property owner's fence at the southwest corner to be level with his neighbor's fence on the east all the way to Peytonville Ave (resulting in a fence height of 6'to 10'). • Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated trees along the east and south of the ballfield area and a berm should be constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons being able to look over the fences into neighboring properties. All mitigated trees shall be on 4-inch caliper rather than 3-inch caliper. Addressing concerns raised by property owners to the East (Stone Lakes Addition): • Relocated the natatorium an additional 16' to the west and lowered the building eave 2', resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment (from 10'to 4). • Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards. • Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block headlights from shining into eastern properties. • Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (31/2 to 4-feet tall) with a hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being accessible only to service and emergency vehicles. • Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded areas on the plan, existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the bufferyard. • School to maintain fencing along the east side as well with the fence on the end being leveled. • Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be downlighting only as provided by sconces mounted at height of 7'. Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2nd Reading: • Landscaping plan and tree mitigation plan for the site with a liberal interpretation of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ballfield area and requiring replacement of only trees that can reasonably be placed on this site. • Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility. 4 �c� City of Southlake, Texas * The applicant has requested that the variance for the lighting of the baseball field be removed from consideration. * The zoning ordinance requires that under build-out of this site, 1,367 parking spaces must be provided. Currently, 1,196 parking spaces with 28 handicapped spaces are provided. A total of 1,689 parking spaces with 33 handicapped spaces are planned. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * All driveways existing are in compliance with previously approved plan. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mark J. Daniels Gordon Johns �n 5 1 3o City of Southlake, Texas SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS Location/Length Required/ Length Bufferyard Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening of Base Line Provided Width/Type Trees Trees Height&Material North - Required 1490 20'- O 58 45 209 See Note 1. Provided 43x 28 209 South (A)- Required 1278 10'- B 26 38 128 8'Screening Device Provided 26 17 0 6'Privacy Fence South-(B) Required 228' 10'-B 5 7 23 (Natatorium) Provided Ox 7 24 East-(A) Required 1233 10'- B 25 37 124 8'Screening Device Provided 25 6 0 6'-8' Wood fence provided West- Required 1788 10'- E 18 36 144 See Note 4. Provided 8 25 55 Other Comments: 1. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public right-of-way, shrubs obtaining a mature height of three feet or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty (30) inches on center Continuous along paved edges of the parking area or drive. 2. A minimum of 50%of all canopy trees planted on the site shall be 2" in caliper and 50%must be 4" in caliper. This includes bufferyards as well as interior. 3. A total of 750 mitigation trees are required. 4. A portion of the bufferyard will be lost due to widening of Peytonville Avenue. X-Taking existing tree credits SUMMARY CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape %of Area in Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Seasonal Cover Area Front or Side Cover Required: 85,788 75% 172 343 2,144 12,868 1,716 Provided: 137 273 1,422 8531 216 6 • 9C-31 0 0. Case No. 99-078 Review No. Four Dated: 5 — 11 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Lot 1R, Block 1; Carroll High School Addition (Site Plan/Rezoning) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 5 - 10- 00. Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The applicant has previously submitted Landscape Plans in two phases for the existing and proposed construction on the school site. The first phase of construction and landscaping involved the Library, Cafeteria, east parking lot additions and landscaping between the high school building and the R.O.W.. The plans were approved and the plant material installed. The second submittal of plans involved the construction of the Activity Center and playing fields on the campus. These Landscape Plans were disapproved because they did not meet the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance, Bufferyard section of the Zoning Ordinance and the previous requirements set forth by the City Council approval of the previous Site Plan. In addition it did not meet the requirements for tree mitigation regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and show the amount of mitigation specified to be provided on the plans by the Landscape Architect. 2. The applicant has chosen to provide a Landscape plan with the Site Plan because the previous City Council action's regarding landscaping was confusing for both the Applicant and City Staff. There are also previous requirements set forth by Council that cannot occur because of constricting circumstances of the approved construction. Although the submitted Landscape Plan does not meet City regulations, we all felt that it would be in the best interest of all parties to publicly show what landscaping was possible on the site and receive an approval, denial or alternative to satisfy all parties involved. 3. Since the applicant is rezoning and joining the Natatorium property to the High School property the entire site is required to comply with the current Landscape Ordinance regulations. This increases the amount of required interior landscape area and plant material on the entire site. 3. Berms: It will not be possible to construct the previously required berms within the area of the south bufferyard. There is a drainage swell within this area that directs site water run-off from west to east for both the school site and the adjacent Park Place properties. Berms cannot be built within this swell because it will impede the flow of water into the southeast detention pond. I also feel that the placement of 4' high berms next to a 6' fence will allow the Park Place residents privacy to be infringed upon. All of the required bufferyard landscape trees and some mitigation trees can be planted within this area without restricting the flow of the drainage. BUILDING INSPECTIONS 102 r 4. Mondell Pines: Although the thought of planting a solid screen of Modell Pines in the south and East bufferyards is excellent, it would not prove to be an effective screen between the school and its adjacent properties. A varied assortment of canopy trees along with Modell Pines and Eastern Red Cedar, as shown on the plan; would look better, be more practical and prove to be a much more effective screen. A solid screen of Mondell Pines would work if the berms could be built. 5. Tree Mitigation: Currently the CISD is required to mitigate two thousand fifty (2,250") inches of protected trees for removal of protected trees not within building or parking lot areas. This amount equals to seven hundred fifty (750), 3" caliper canopy trees. Approximately 1/3 of the required mitigation trees are shown and provided for on the submitted Landscape Plan. The School District may plant the remaining trees on other school sites within the City or make a payment into the Reforestation Fund as provided for in the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 6 Previous Site Plan approval regarding landscaping: * 50% of the required accent trees and 100% of the shrubs for east and south bufferyards be placed along Peytonville Avenue. (A portion of this has been installed but due to the current construction has been demolished or is dead. At the time of inspection for a Final Certificate of Occupancy all required plant material will be required to be installed as was approved.) * Noting the applicant agreement that 100% of the cost of canopy trees, accent trees, and shrubs in the east and south bufferyards will instead be used for Mondell Pines in the east and south bufferyards. (This will be installed during the current phase of construction. The landscape Plan reflects Mondell Pines in the south bufferyard but the applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits for thirt six (36) trees of the fiftyeight (58) required Mondell Pines.) * Allowing the required bufferyard plant materials within the east bufferyard to be planted on the west side of the channel. (Some trees are located on the west side of the existing channel but because of the majority amount of the proposed landscaping is mitigation trees for the current phase of development, most of the trees are shown adjacent to the east property line. There is not enough area between the drainage channel and the east property line to plant the trees,please place all plantings on the west side of the channel.) * Requiring a 4' berm in open areas along the south property line and along the east property line west of the drainage channel in a manner to not effect detention. (Berms are not proposed on the submitted Landscape Plan. Because of the actual grading and placement of the ball fields, there is a drainage ditch along the South property line and 4' berms would impede drainage.) * Noting the applicant's commitment to plant along Peytonville Avenue. (This has been installed but due to the current construction has been demolished or is dead. At the time of inspection for a Final Certificate of Occupancy all required plant material will be required to be installed as was approved.) * Accepting the applicants commitment to follow the current Tree Preservation Ordinance and their willingness to consider following the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance once they BUILDING INSPECTIONS 1C-33 . + have reviewed it. (The applicant has attempted to follow the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and has proposed to place 291 mitigation canopy trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This is over and above what is required for the developmental landscaping of the proposed construction. The total required mitigation amount equals 2,250 diameter inches equaling 750, 3" caliper canopy trees. 291, 3" caliper mitigation trees equaling 873" are proposed on the site. 1,377 inches, equaling to 459, 3" caliper canopy tress remain to be mitigated.) 7. High School Site Landscaping: The applicant did not provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance. Since there is no legend provided with the Landscape Plan that distinguishes required bufferyard and interior plant material from mitigation trees it is difficult to determine if the plan complies with City regulations. The attached Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart reflects what is required versus what is provided by the applicant based on what is shown on the Landscape Plan. The "Required" amounts as shown in the summary charts are correct. The "Provided" amounts as shown in the Summary Charts are unclear. 8. Natatorium Site Landscaping: The applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits in the north, south and east bufferyards as well as the interior landscaping. Some the existing trees within these areas are either dead or not considered quality trees for preservation. It would benefit the site as well as the adjacent homeowners to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality canopy trees in their place. The undesirable trees are comprised of China Berry and Mulberry. Most of all the Canopy trees provided on the site are mitigation trees from the High School's current construction. Attached: Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart BUILDING INSPECTIONS 1'3 MEMORANDUM June 1, 2000 TO: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator FROM: Malcolm Jackson, Chief Building Services SUBJECT: Carroll ISD Site Plan and Plat Revisions for Carroll High School During the Development Review Committee meetings, staff recommended that Carroll Independent School District (CISD) representative, Total Project Management (TPM), submit a landscape plan to clarify the ever-changing landscape and tree mitigation issues surrounding the various CISD projects under review. Through the various presentations made by TPM there have been several differing provisions and promises made relative to landscaping and tree mitigation requirements, many of which either conflicted with previous approved plans or were not feasible as a result of a wide variety of problems, including drainage complications. By developing a comprehensive plan that would address all of the school sites, such a detailed plan would permit clearing all of the previous and often conflicting plans, and better clarify the issues and requirements. TPM agreed. For clarification, issues exist with both landscape requirements and tree mitigation requirements. Bufferyard landscape requirements are regulated by the Zoning Ordinance. Interior landscape requirements are regulated by the Landscape Ordinance. Tree mitigation requirements are regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. It remains important during presentations to the various boards and to the City Council to keep these requirements separate, since the provisions of these ordinances differ significantly. The Landscape Administrator initially received two sets of landscape plans for the Carroll High School site. One was presented by Shrickle & Rolings and one set by Balwin, each showing the entire site. Neither set maintained consistency with the other, and neither met the requirements. In addition, neither indicated with any specificity the location or quantity of tree plantings at other sites as a result of required tree mitigation plantings. On Thursday, June 1, 2000, Baldwin submitted a revised landscape plan; however, it is unacceptable for a variety of reasons. It fails to accurately reflect the existence of the locations of buildings on the site. It fails to meet the minimal bufferyard landscape requirements. It fails to meet the minimal interior landscape requirements. It fails to have a legend which clearly indicates the trees by identifying them as bufferyard, interior landscape or tree mitigation plantings. Specifically as it relates to tree mitigation requirements, CISD is required to plant seven hundred fifty (750) three inch (3") trees as a result of the destruction of trees totaling 2,249" at the Carroll High School site. In addition, CISD is anticipated to be required to plant seven hundred fifty nine (759) three inch (3") trees as a result of the destruction of trees totaling 2,277" at the school and stadium sites along Kimball Road. These plantings are required in addition to any requirements under the bufferyard requirements and the interior landscape requirements. Garland Wilson, Director Public Safety Carroll ISD Site Plan and Plat Revisions for Carroll High School June 1, 2000 Page 2 TPM representative Brent Kline has indicated CISD desired consideration be given by P&Z and/or City Council for a variance to waive the tree planting requirements, particularly those related to tree mitigation requirements. While the landscape ordinance permits the City Council to grant variances under specific guidelines and limitations, there are no provisions for a variance to the tree preservation ordinance. More specifically, Section 4.2 of the Tree Preservation ordinances states, "a person aggrieved by a decision of the Landscape Administrator may appeal the decision to the Tree Board. The decision of the Tree Board shall be final." Mr. Kline further indicated a desire to offset tree mitigation requirements with the planting of other landscape plants such as shrubs and/or flowers. The Landscape Administrator denied this request because the life expectancy and ecological benefit of shrubs and flowers remain negligible in comparison to that of trees, and although these plants may enhance the appearance of the sites, it remains clearly outside of the intent and provisions of the tree preservation ordinance. Section 5.2 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance does permit some limited flexibility in the decisions made by the Landscape Administrator. This section states, "The Landscape Administrator shall be authorized to work with owners, developers, and builders to make non-substantive changes, within the scope of this Ordinance, to plans, permits and other requirements throughout the development and construction processes that will provide the greatest reasonable protection toward achieving the purposes of this Ordinance." Given the significant number of trees required to be planted for mitigation under the Tree Preservation Ordinance, we all recognize that it is not possible to successfully plant 750 trees on the high school campus site. Nor would the planting of 756 trees on the Kimball Road sites represent sound practices under universally accepted arborist and horticultural practices. In accordance with the provisions of Section 5.2 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance as outlined above, the Landscape Administrator has suggested a plan consistent with the following provisions to minimize the impact of the tree mitigation while maintaining the integrity of the ordinance requirements: • Determine the exact total number of trees to be planted for mitigation purposes. • Plant as many trees as possible, consistent with universally accepted arborist and horticultural practices, on the high school campus. • Plant as many of the remaining required plantings as possible, consistent with universally accepted arborist and horticultural practices, on all other school campus sites. • For any remaining trees, the Landscape Administrator can permit 50% of these plantings to be made in public areas such as parks and the roadway medians along South Kimball in front of the school sites and a waiver of 50% of the plantings. (This is in lieu of direct payment into the Reforestation Fund.) Mr. Kline was contacted on Thursday, June 1, 2000 and all of these issues were discussed in detail. In addition, it was suggested that he should be prepared to address these issues during the presentations to City Council and that he presents a landscape plan that: • Shows compliance with the bufferyard requirements • Shows compliance with the landscape ordinance requirements • Shows compliance with the tree mitigation planting requirements on the Carroll High School site. 1:-3lv Garland Wilson, Director Public Safety Carroll ISD Site Plan and Plat Revisions for Carroll High School June 1, 2000 Page 3 • Indicates at what campuses the additional plantings will take place for all of the required tree mitigation planting of trees that cannot be made on this site. For example: 150 — 3" trees at Durham Elementary, 100 — 3" trees at Carroll Middle School, etc. • Provides a legend that clearly indicates which trees are designated for compliance with the bufferyard requirements, which are for interior landscape requirements, and which are used towards tree mitigation requirements. Mr. Kline indicated that he might not be able to provide such a detailed plan until June 20, 2000 or later. Nonetheless, it was suggested that it remained possible to indicate the intent to achieve these items as outlined, along with specific dates, which could then be made as a part of any motion approved by the City Council. Mr. Kline further indicated a concern about undertaking the actual plantings during the summer months in order to meet the requirements for obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. Although plantings undertaken during the summer months require detailed attention to care, especially sufficient watering, such plantings are successfully undertaken by landscape companies routinely. Nonetheless, there is a provision in both the Landscape Ordinance and the Tree Preservation Ordinance that permits delayed plantings with specific provisions. Consistent with the ordinance provisions, the Landscape Administrator can accept a letter of credit, cash escrow, or bond to ensure compliance with an approved landscape plan. This mechanism was designed to provide an alternative to off-peak planting season activity. It remains important to clearly understand the history of non-compliance and to review the complexity of the various landscape and tree mitigation proposals previously existing. To this end, a matrix is attached that outlines these issues. These landscape requirements no doubt necessitate an expenditure of CISD funds. However, it is important to also note that in the spirit of inter-governmental cooperation and betterment of the community, the City of Southlake provides significant monetary savings to CISD by waiving of all building permit fees. Specifically, the City has waived $ 461,575 in fees for current projects while continuing to provide the building plan review and inspection services these funds would normally cover. A separate chart is attached that details the specifics of the fee waivers provided. We remain willing to assist TPM and CISD in achieving their objectives of providing quality campuses in compliance with the specifications of the applicable ordinances. Moreover, we are open to alternative ideas consistent with these provisions. As always, I am available for any questions or comments. MWJ/mwj Cc: Garland Wilson, Director Public Safety Bruce Payne, Director Planning Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager Billy Campbell, City Manger lC-3'1 • CISD Project History Relative to Landscape and Tree Mitigation June 1, 2000 Durham Elementary Approved Details Current Status Original Building built in 1996. Landscaping No approved plans submitted and no plantings to be done as a result of a gardening project conducted. Last notification letter of non-compliance designed and operated by the Joint Use sent to CISD representative John Craft November 1999. Committee project. Carroll High School (Library/ Cafeteria/ Activity Center/ Ball fields) Approved Details Current Status Allow 50% of required accent trees and 100% Plantings done along the west side by Peytonville, but all of required shrubs for the east and south have since died or been destroyed by construction bufferyard requirements to be moved to the activity. west side along Peytonville. No plantings conducted along the east side. Plantings complete along the north (FM1709) side. 100% of the cost of canopy trees and shrubs in No plantings of trees along the east or south sides the east and south to be used for only trees selected by the Landscape Administrator and to be planted in the east and south bufferyard Trees planted along the east bufferyard are to No plantings of trees along the east side be placed on the west side of the drainage channel Construction of a 4' berm along the east and Unable to construct berm, particularly along the south south sides side, due to restrictions in drainage flows. Comply with tree mitigation requirements for No mitigation plantings and/or payment to the replanting of 750 trees to replace the 2,249" of Reforestation Fund non-exempt trees destroyed on site Request for submittal of a detailed landscape No acceptable landscape plan submitted. Two plan that shows bufferyard, interior landscape, companies presented conflicting plans, neither of which and tree mitigation plantings. met minimal requirements. Carroll Intermediate#2 (Kimball Road) Approved Details Current Status As many mitigated trees to be planted on site as Projected amount of mitigation requirements to be 759 possible with remainder to be placed in the trees with a maximum of 358 able to be planted on site. Kimball Road median. Stated intent to plant remaining at other schools, not median. Save the tree with the Hawk Tree currently remains Plant as many trees as possible along the Not currently complied with the tree survey plan roperty lines requirements and no preliminary landscape plans submitted. CISD Project History Matrix—June 1, 2000 Page 2 Carroll Middle School (Dove @ Carroll Road) Approved Details Current Status Waive the west and north bufferyard Project still under construction. requirements Require planting on the south half of the east Project still under construction. bufferyard only at this time/ deferring the plantings in the north half of the east bufferyard (Note: Significant planting area available on this campus until construction of the stadium is complete, site for mitigation tree plantings.) with a full waiver if plantings result in the loss of parking spaces. Allowing the Landscape Administrator to work Plan submitted and approved. Plantings pending with the Landscape Architect in determing the completion of construction. best location for interior landscape plantings to be made. Durham Elementary Upgrade / Additions Approved Details Current Status Currently under review for comments CISD Stadium (Kimball Road) Approved Details Current Status Currently under review for comments Additional Notations: (1.) Landscape Administrator Keith Martin met with Joint Use Committee, Dr. Giliam (CISD), Brent Kline (TPM), and Shrickle & Rollins (CISD Landscape Architect) on April 26, 2000 to discuss the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. Clarification was given regarding the Landscape Ordinance provisions and the Tree Mitigation requirements. (2) No issues exist for the Administration Building, Carroll Intermediate #1, Johnson Elementary, Carroll Elementary, Carroll Junior High, or Rockenbaugh. Significant area available for planting of tree mitigation plantings at these sites. 1C-3 Current Construction Projects for Carroll Independent School District June 1, 2000 Description Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Permit Fee Waived 1 Elementary School #5 1050 S. Carroll $11,000,000 $ 63,025 Intermediate School #3 500 S. Kimball $ 13,000,000 $ 79,525 Middle School #2 400 S. Kimball $ 19,500,000 _ $ 109,775 Rockenbaugh Elementary Addition $ 2,000,000 $ 13,525 301 Byron Nelson Carroll Middle School Remodel $ 6,000,000 $ 35,525 1100 E. Dove Durham Elementary/Intermediate $ 1,000,000 $ 8,025 Gymnasium — 801 Shady Oaks Durham Elementary/Intermediate $ 250,000 $ 3,275 Cafeteria— 801 Shady Oaks Carroll Elementary Cafeteria $ 500,000 $ 3,725 1705 W. Continental Stadium $ 13,000,000 $ 79,525 1085 S. Kimball Natatorium— Carroll High School $ 5,500,000 $ 32, 725 01 W. Southlake Blvd. ultipurpose Bldg. — Carroll High $ 2,000,000 $ 13,525 1501 W. Southlake Blvd. Co-Curricular Items Carroll High $ 1,000,000 $ 8,025 1501 W. Southlake Blvd. Transportation Center $ 1,600,000 $ 11,325 1075 S. Kimball Totals $76,350,000.00 $ 461,525 Current Building Fees Waived 1C.-4c SOUTHRIDGE LAKE WATERFORD DRIVE \ 3 LKW.Y.. .jj ;. ..A. LUDZONED PUO tt �* i �II BLOCK = MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL E n} yx i I ° a A STONE LAKES PHASE I GRAPHIC SCALE r J � nq.La I1 o CAB.A, SL.915 o N �I, ti. i tir ��r 2.. JN ENIST INF.6 NIGH / e Ft. — I �..� , pf.�w., •,_ PRIVACY FENCE .{ . �2�N�I _ANTI 6' HIGH W� Awel II xR is 1�� so0•u,L1Sw_.:_ 5o$sr w ILACY FENCE nc.� 6� BLOCK T C4!.. ly NOTE: t �,,y- { I .! uRv L isc,w .a6 1.1...A.uua E P...: .. w / Carrot xlm smml...Ion.u.m AP. - - k"'..,,;^al C� S I - - f.p_e(up/NG t our (''( 3 \\ _.._ /9r . Tracts,•,.=I m, - . „ n I; c wc. TDEtAI[— 11'' II zxx O a I - i c'trT I�/ —.. r ,� ,z II4. xlamoe�v OWII„Hm•,.NI kr.• �„,,,al i T• ti702..L 1 ' A,r.il STONE LAKES PHASEA'I ag t of • \B : CAEI.A SL.679A' • o Iy LI _ �"it 1 „_ —I _SG 17'00' .32'. ' P.O.B. 434 -_. ( / 39lDO : ® PARRLA•CE, „' ' SOFTBALL FIELD " ,'a6eol _- 1 ® ® sb PEASE J - II CAB.A, .SL.2675 GAP9011„XA, o C ` m tow ( ' ` 1991 r- oD a. DATA WANK.AND PARKING : sIIEw SiA/x AH F2 14 O. I i , , 'III' G" I In IMO i s L�irle 1. Q ._.. Zg.r STORY WOOING NCLUOEs Rt et a z. I II : Oy Y •_,II :. _.iir. E / II�p r .- $m �IinT(S•UYi1xG°6STATIONS HATix.rfl .DOS o- .,,E .a 4'.-I - z1u LNG x.'FINE LONE •F 1Lq:)(:) ` I�"�� . II EXISTING NO PROPOSED tOxlxL.Y, Ir+rci HR...puE T-/ 11 - _ tuo USE rcslGNATlw. IQ� 'p e, 1 AR 4 \ wam r SUPPER IC D C 5 •AIR d10'x50 �+ # \� xQNIAIE OF SITE MENAGE iNIIOING IMPRINT/ �� ` tw01 NG II EXISTING 6 HIGH: EXISTING Ud 991 1`'HI.'µ1'E 1E 1F1�I IryI;I 1y 1F 1E,E 1C1E - ,,. 1 I I Te PRIVACY FENCE now HT N-I : E%I Si LNG .DLT i`�il�lllllltlllllllllll I .,,,` EXISTING - �� i l�• . F HIGN . /_::� PRACT ICC FIElO NNR ANE•6Orcx YArf1YEA L[ft Ix YTIAUL STARrtAMNt•RN 11N �.�-f I AOpITION SCHOOL •I I .:: ,�._.._•�� I 4• iI K �..._...ar. FLOW I.III igli.Frt./SSP 4 APES i ,j I....,_, _. -'1 IINIII'I] n 111 1""T„•'1.I I I 'IAII - - - . 11111111 t l 1111 1 II!' - I a il(ncOrcO YSll •rcNI.En.¢ JI * q ' f d ,O'x25.LOADING ..II IIpliOW-tC _.__ __.... 0 Nlm(xG NFn .I � ! ���� �I ��fmmplipmmimi RIO 0_ IZ j IP 1 3 °pirlan I 5 1 % P•.CTIFIELLIFn M R. I P CARROLL 19CH 5 P�'MDVfa b3 '•l.. A=s COONSIIT N- 1400 fr I I SCHOOL ADDITION �� y' :rt l4r F�1 0,:. ACTIVITY t� �r E -, .JJJ(((CCCTTTIRI,.ill I - LOT I,DLOCKI pt �NO ( 1E (� , uYWL Sm1w - n5 CIRC.LE..- . In CRCC VSIDEYALE ( CA17.A SLIDE 1460 IEFI[LO CENTER / _— �P T/(l/Y EASERNI/IYP LAPIS[ PHASE l /�' r N i 36I9U1 ; 3TOP „� E I _ Q MIA LAIN m"' ' 5 ......... �� I ,Al.. i P.M NUELURING SPACES wwlx0 —tow-]N� AlI _ _.. 33 I aU ��I1 o^.N VI p4.G,.. PN. 'I - . P ACCESSORY BUILDING WOODED AREA I rrorr ID D EXISTING u? ,, ... „„. f p _ P E VAIAT ,J. I I Z 5 /STIAENT aNO I1R INCLUDING L NC o I b' w 1 Y . -ENS),N• ENE<,UP-T /A urn:UV£ASEI(xr(/r - {$ y D I Tut u 6,j 1 � t...I I z irF/srwfxr es,x¢INIR s N W ni< r3'^ q • o S ,„ ` ❑ ,�.,, ...r a.. A I TEN INS SPACES INCLINING 11 RC Z Z.r q I N ES.9-$ ] th va•..v _ - _ _�a swat 1 PLPRNSOEO 101DIN PACES S 0 F�� S'a .P_(.' v,La` 1 s@. \ ..,. A .. ....._ n Aw IK'Hrtfs AN[,'.Nv' . I � AL srYA�ANo r n I� `1• I SPr i9 (• )• TRACE AND PTACT ICC FIELD I. N11 \►I�.I c SHOT-PUT AREA ,s §E - ¢I /rE 111 CYlIl is FASEIE , , i Ilq SEATLNG PIAWIEDI I I • INH .}.11 F �a`I' 5 TL awk xlAE�m/1LiANE • -• \ , LI__— L .y / �1 “E • '..1 I� ix OTxEASNDL2E SPY--�4r. ! ®�� _ n r+ --I_ _ �,*.._..°_..__.._..—.. �_m`���_ .-- _6 o557,�1-7azt c. • �` NRECD [AM 12000 T.aasrrt�uLE, .___...._ >a.— f r� `° ..T nca� s,,.l .. ._...._..._.__._._...... • ^WoIT.' i i».Tf �x1� xaa ] : — tF_. REVISED SITE PLAN - �rl ■ srN¢ • „= g8 �c„f.Tt' RAcItrpo/z, l AKARD Trio �' I' 6MPw BLOCK 2 mw BLOCK 2 • oc�� ZONEDor 6 C2 I "Lor s V.388.-142,p.100 CO CARROLL HIGHRS ADDITTON n ¢PuRur".N 30'COIEGN ACCESS ESYI�, j � ,, C TO TIES THE CITY OF fOl7TNLAIR 0 'XGREE*000 • BAKER ESTATES CAB.A, SL.2917 • TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS E = APPROVED PLAT SNOW ,,�Rr LOTS s 6 6 "v.sb40,9 soo ZONED - AG ZONED - SF 20A MI.TO Nor 1.OW.1.CAREDu 1PCH SCOWL AMNION NOTE: LUD = RE It 5RI1IERCIAL LUD = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE oesom .R41012 °NRmmcARRerA,SLIDE ly P. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUESTED PER PEYTIINYILLE AVENUE WILL REQUIRE LUD = MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PINT REDDRoI T�'T COMM.T05 A AHD SO n]NG A 0.107 ACRE TRACT OP A RECORDED IN NTAINING SITE REDESIGN TO COORDINATE ACCESS. SITE ENTRY.PARKING CONFIGURATION. AND T 551 PAGE Pas,AND vOla(16 I PAGE aaB, f AND LANDSCAPING TO RE REDESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH n DEED RECORDS.TARRANT COUNTY,TEx0.c APPROVED CONSTRUCTION or LAND PLANS FOR PROPOSED TURN LANE. SURVEYOR-ENGfNEER 00511ARrHITPU ARCNI]014505.WNRB 9►yy'g iI All 10•Den ACRES or M Te.W•Aa000UT'Gs POT GRODP.INCCEAY...1PfT RCOErenDIX1'SCHOOL DISTRICT •RSNA.I°C1 Mn.iaseM.r�RRANr couNrr.rdAS FAIFIENNTS As LION CO SONAwPIK n•nFO„IRNTIES ARE WOKEN IN SUE vLLur/PAGF AS PLAT 1 E.I.AITAR xLVD'SUITE zoo 01I0 AIRPORT PTtE Ca, 3 I .6EOIp 7/REEE•r I F.c AMISS nNCnISE Nano ARTIIrGTox,24T1ZIAS5-05 o arRgA¢.R[ASA,TMI -0720 (ASIA..N PRPYRTr SNOT„II ITN ICS AR FILED IN CAB.A.SL IDE late.TRESS 011NP1Y 1.1E.. PB 7)Sap_Oe5 p FAX Se CELVND TCSA.9 MOO noon.n 71 aBEgn]2 60u fp,T p WR1 2. ONE TAT DER EASFN4Nrs WIN K N Y RCPOFO OM MIS PLAS A%Ip17) -0532 IE171 Tel-NON, _...,. AY lEl],231-L„11 ..,,.. .__.. _ SITE DATA SUMMARY BY PHASE PROPOSED SE-I REGULATIONS Pn h. MIKMs Pw.s.1 eI ie. M.,re i tZ, Iron,,?:Ibp MOMVIu [Imram Patlp 1 ab of Project.C1�11tlwhchaU.*, ^c�i Cue No. ZA 99071 �01�NIN RRhvavttt boll _ _ Orcia Pmpeaed Repia.bea Comm... env sr. Sent 1f•Tlf WOOSS.poi am I Pe pined Uses Sane as CS with the fib bl b`pe 3I.i96 6E.ESIE WO/ Sl./11 [5.01! 56.01! following eocptiomJlow1 - foe use(acdilimwb the Ciry ofSwt4Ee. Premertag. l.of sift ES I EST f1.JJ IS.I3 It 2 Accessory Usnsoil seldom u CS, seldom ouabnvrq lighted tennis a hn d Opp Spina inn.41 p.M. R aura,liglwl taw-GO folds vollildesdbers and P.ytima 2 719 R <mcmum do runs.y use,.pdavm field,sod 69.4 _ i.rtv owing Mail, �Lwof SAalb la W MA PA NA 4 S Sped!Use Pumas Sure as CS P=...d Ma24 W PA gf IQ NA VA a Rvelap,tetg Regn4ticu Siv{Cwlnallen N1 341 E-E1 241 1 91 1 Pohlm,+m.../1 f1�aeiinvlleo 141 Fit 1-06 lbdb 1}� 1 Seim 4.1 Height ea CS 11)�c.diiv4l. 1S.1L1Fq. Mt,7s1am aNRPeo 4J.666ilio R IC e l Field Yard Same u fS 33II14 11dp 1310 —30 O.WON/ liC 34 fi. M N. X R. 1t n4dO thin Rs 143412 n R C MC.Mitt% IC 13 Side Yard Some a CS.mvpm ono MI line development 1J.10 41a11 b0 allowed rla Free h W 111.171 aq.n.Edo. R 49.151 fin NEES Case 41E00 Elsa. R 44 Rev YW Same.CS meal hl.xhn,m la Coverage Same as f S Tnio1 IT.IS ad,.Om 611 10 Om, SEWIdn i16.%6 Um. idd p IC it le 4.6 Maximum.Impervious ..icu age Same CS Inu /11 R R p SivWd lit R R MS R dN CJ /d32114 De.TbpsvaFtegulatica .1 Sme.O.e.ep Wenistio/high school eduruimoJ Ei.au,l awes being saved Fly videmdd tonal laiptl 21 ` c PC 4336 building u¢s lying within.W fine of bode..sd addition amcMd Acre.shed,emulae popery lies.ill partially Ihield be 1!1 MT Me single family,eidepti.1 xmw,g existing Toarmeion maenets, sbfares, and podding from view and madato y f and .rchitem.al style_ tmu m the.yle- e proposed J.be Way edema,lighting will be clawed away hominid SoediN R It R exempt from vnriol and ho,vnne1 anieup,ioo from$ndemd popery. N aoquircmmn and the,ryoi,emenu for a e.i height Mina aub.k from existing residential sorting. 6 high memb.Ihvimmgd,d tllsmOb,eidrn0al so' — J 5 Concept Pl. No Concept Rim Asa be requited. Site develo ped SP-1 nquinnl•sale plain to beeabmind for additional �•�- — dcvelopmrnt. r 6 Eff ofCoocp Moo No Cmcgl Plea..good. t'33'r 1 See PMn Some as CS I Special Exception Use Same e O RECD MAY 312000 REVISED SITE PLAN • 1.OT 1R,BLOCK 1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDMON TO TEl TIE art Or ROUTELSU TA/YAM COMITY.TWO Mama Y!WOW IV for 1.oYQ X.U00fF 00 Ne mo.umfro. T II/Oi 6P*wawa as mamma pal 401E A Mall IMq PAT Lcml TAPRART OASTT.TSTY Ma 1W Mama A 4-00I AM TEAR 0 AN AI110000 01 RON 19414.PAN III.YY ROM Mil PA0 CIE 6®ONMa,TAOYRa .>QY �m•ffi AXED= AL 11 '20T Ma fIdTIM It 10 tale PIm.MT[T t7oAlL4•AOmpA}>a Ma 00A.MC- TOTAL P000AY•WIIA®0.T tlORt®QCOMeT 1010E OWR. AM[YCT Y-1Y4 tA0A1R CgmITT.TRY MyT MI s AWONM.NRI NO • 1OKfP PMaOFT NIIR 07* Wp P.Ant=PMafIT MO R.CJORL ARM/ OHO 111y1M�Y PON.OCEAN Q>R MA) TIFF MM.TRAM TUN Mv[okq TRIM TOM PAT f11Y1 111-0.M rati M!-OIM d. (1.1�1.1-mind MT)a Alf-!dr Oils LOT CAM 033 L ° o re 4p, (''—.:7) L I d4 1 �� I r II n' 1 ��'° 1 x ,10:" ti ' ° 1\1,(VI jj ' C*-- i''''s.'`1° °III' co _ r 1 .... • ,`' f o' `f(r H ED _..:_,_4 --/,,, 0, -,)-- 1 ,,,,,...,,,„,.. , ,. �f . , 1 „: . 1,--- —Y-� I t�� ,Id r :� z ° J 1 °1 1 I 1 1 3 S_{, JI``,� 1 of r J 44 mJ �.1 '} , ,3 rya ., L° :: - F��I 2J ... 3" I tn O(7 �l �--�<G Q b f I ® o( m C� L I � n I ' i ii I---- i,r�� —.,—.+_ S_L) I _i El E 71 54 t. E __,EJj�jQ.`.", 7�F Y! W W+ �T ,c. NI Flo y• VY\I C 5 I ; a r: f --04.,... 1 r _ _ ., t_6,. m : CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT �.sw. �0CHEATHAM62ASSOCIAT�S sc, AQUATICS CENTER J SLIM CONSLITNC F�GINFFRS .•r SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS wnlr °"'o ti °". mi ou rs as.em s.sa. WATER E. SANITARY SEWER PLAN ooswsn�� :1 uw.o o...VOS .c.e....r.[.n.n • C y '. ° mil I si_- —T 7,., a,,, e ° J °r e. 9 i1T A-me-J - - 5A \ - , .-1 Ai,,4.0.:*0 , 1 I T1,......==.,,- 4 - 1 I 1 i ' tilk \ .I ' +aO,\ lire 'y y A° , ,,,.-2, ,,,,,,,,,,,;:,,„.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,„.„,,, 4, : \� #,°� .,,c, ..., ..,„ te ' _., ria,' Aot,r„ ;...,,,,, ,i, .,,,,,,,,,-, .17.4..,..,,:„ .- I (---F •IP' 1 ri 31' ' e 4 6.442,1;A:W:i.r''' 4 .,444.e.re-''* 1 Itt/31 a° I jL %N % �- �'' 11 iv fcAI° w 4 1 a - a a> I -'"iik r 3` x F �wfitlr "�"' ''`i' aRa� +'❑I Ly vI I u � x rk r *7" r= , c� r §�c� j l� IiI DomCC, j o c 1 D—H .51111-13 f 1 R"' Z C'f D n Aa , , ICE. N j / l J le �,,° , � 6 bid ° �I: �i : I ❑ ---.) I I 1 ` L 9t101 I E E E ❑ A —W W w-f— �1 . I ,i MI ,,, , � e .._ o , .. ,..„ , ro- ,, _, ._,_., G i i ,.., , ..,,, r_ ,.„. ...,, i a#A q 0 ❑ Q. i ' •. °`�'�i _^C OI I \ \ \ as°,a " °,n rt CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT _,4 AQUATICS CENTER CHEATHAMfEASSOCIAlES } �i_ COu5l.1 TING E�GIUEERS d.dn �°r SOUTHLAXE,TEXAS °°,°rY lao e H a-u rr an au.v °.i.a. STORM SEWER PLAN'T'�' Fralr.:1:!!‘ r!Tr:rarrrr---•-• .(.141..f.firaarl"--.! (Ai a • nrs.p'so !, LOT 2 Z.—LOT I—,.,. — —I X/.... .. T. 0 0 igg,,.....,.......g.qgt,vwt.b.VilMWIMEMOMINOMmg• wow 1.72.....7.,---;....... ...i.Z..".i...,-7... .. -rar.: r.cajr4! """ r Iva — -.,-,5r r„4,7,,,,,,. — — — —. '....4':. ' .'.- '-'.'-'r'' il •A ise =1'•T‘ * II II il.1 PI ! ,.. ..,• 4,.V.0 ',I.44' .. _._ .__ ... ..7. I inn§....g."-18 f 1' '`,4 i i , ! -77; 2''''irr:1111ffeir, •,\'‘ 4 i,„... _ , _., %4: -,4---- •r, k I 1 4 fr.: -• gi 1 lyi - .,: :, ,.. r!Al!r"""11.-Lo r; '! ..r1. j l' --r !I \II Ter-. -r-r - co ..,.. r '4 • a,. 1. ' do, oi m c'l' i ; ! i : . F :. .' IA-% , ___ ,r!ri I at, ril 1,i, r Cl g i k - ",...Q 'ale.-..N —71 I ... 4 i , - -.I i g s m--- 7 0 . .. ...„,_ . . 0 ; ei "'if:, ..-'' if 0 : 1 0, ,,ILWINJII , fli 1...`" ' 0 ie . ,-_'..--;;--..s,:m; 11„,,,,,„,,,„N ,. .:: ----Eigt 7'• -;•ZN.;; I ;- . ii....- . ___,,,„„,...„ It:1: iritHiff144 fli:' .19 a P..g.'.2----.. 'ii i i ,. .•, ‘‘`•+ I : ' ' • ‘..., ;,' 11 A gat_I--' 'I i I! ',,g ,, 1 , -1,0"--1 , !Icl 1-t. ' ; . .:„.,,, i_or---ix...____ -L /___. ._...,_°_4! ._,,,,,_, _v.:A I '•_ ns.1 , !i ,.,- I •-• I ''i r , •• ' nV.;1;;;,. a 24) G 1...„, , 4 40...1... • . 171J- 11111 11111111 . _ Rii.,.,1 F . ,L •.-.,,. ; Jr__ : 1 •SO9 405 W ''.. . .." .. . ... .....it..J L'0 SPH1111111111111111IIIIIHA 111: `'-' ' 'L I I _ ,_ 1 ' 1 . , •L'.1 " . 1 f.'" 1 Fil[wiliiiii,iitittili, ciiiiiiitliwiNoT•1_ 1 ! 1±: . L: ' ;,,,;,; 1 (f,,,„„miu„,„„„,„„ , 0 :i,__ AIA,. - /.--.....---7-^e- . •, .",-_-,:,1 .-.11 .., ,..............._ -- , . ..... ,...• I . :II . _ ' .II ( , __ , . @ 1 1 i , •I I i 17--- ' ! /. /0 i -- I - ,ir ---,:-., ,,i1 , ) i ,., •1 7 ._,_1 0 1 1 -•E:.r 7----=-7'',..- / ''.P.:i. i.1 lc 1. i ' - I Ei i--.\ ;.. WEDGE WOOD t 1.1'''i (. • 4 14-1 7 ,'ji, 1 il • t ,A 'f/N'' ii; ', 1 71 1 1. - ---- ' I 'V ) , 4.: ii,,,i, ' I , 1 ii, ... .. :, , / 1 ,;111,,,I,' ,, j 1 i i 1/4s 1'11-.! ',--11 ,L) •-•: . ki: ,i. ",, -, , i. \ - :i 71 • f 1 I I i I ! I ii, f rr, li tr„ r rir!,! ur, ! !!, . . r ,%, - !i' \ " ' !. ..-. 11 r'!!! 1,i 1, \\ \ I :' L. ..! •J';',r' 1----'-t-.-4!--!---'4, . I 1 il !,t \ it ,r \ ---` r -:_-_-:- -_,- ___;4.11:::-.-f-r --r ir • !..... \ , r'l'h 11 l'! '....... 1... . .... 'i \' ir '' p I' -.. .., . / 1, .., , 1,r)..1 i ‘ / ,,,,),:1,,, ! 1 _i\1' jr• 1;1111 r, :... .... RiccTHmoND 1 • , ..:,,,,A ,„.. 0 n11/1),111 N., -- 11' i iii,,., ,.....,..V.' i',1 • I ,, ......-............. 1/1 .t;._ I ' / . ' II tr i .-. !ii I •••. -I' •'' l' -'14 ' / 1 A 3Al2:10 2:11183NOIS litril . \ ,; ,y ••,,, - --/--' 0 ; i A l'''',(',r i.1 ,/ / 1 4.. //II; , r. -- ---,,,, .-- ,,- --- __- -- m=,mm. .---- -,.m.,.,,,,,_ .._-,--, - Al.001f 030 69 N 9 1 .00 OBZ1 ?s• co P i 1 . 0 .. -a r- p 1 • • !I, 0 / / 1 ''' cOs• 0 o H . 1 ..-..,1 i- 0 a i„ ,`,, 1 1 1 i•J x ; : . r. E.1 ,,, If: 6 ,, z1 li 30V-Id >181/d / 1 1 c5i . „ . . •• :II 1..............,,, 4 c, 1:31- p,t il MI ias „..7.„;,,, .•— ,..,.; ;;;:, 11 2X 11 El aaga s31aaszas:r,ssa“.1,11i I In 11! •e • t Me 1 li q 5 RR FAni, `.."§ • !....,•1 ,--• 1 r...:, ..--- CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT .,, f: * .: CHEATHAM&ASSOCIATES M.. AQUATICS CENTER .CONSULTING ENGINEERS .0.2.. SOUTMLAKE.TEXAS ARINGTON TX 76011 ,... NNO DRAINAGE AREA MAP :::: ::::::u. AND RUNOFF CALCULATIONS ,... • •' ' 7 ..... _____. .gam L 1! 1i1r Id✓k a£ 1§1;E �' n f e a , ,.�1k taic `iT1E8 51 ``• p . l4 t 4 pi A' I r Ii y all i a I I 1 to CC 7a- I•,, �' I y I I W ' z FEF `Tr lit J`• I r 11 t m .] a as ° e ' I,1 1 .I 1 al It` II_ @IS � II I . I N I r K i,.K ' ,I 1 , ,» . YID f I 1` aA on� I I .•K `+4 'I 4 —�f$ 1 III • 3.11i, 1.i �.,.�C_• \ # ° I & r n DII 'w r' C ) _ \ \ • i Y 2 I ��..I I I i i I 1' o 1 e'er. •j I *1 i; • if I \\ 1 ' II 1 ce*Z____,________ j I i li \ ♦ '� `yM1 i I I I J r I I. I i J �' I f� �♦ i I: I J _O .I 1 IIU\\\\ I I i i C .\ I 1 f i i 1 ''i I�\If �-1� `; ; / I I I \ I I Kr MTN .r l I H I II I I ' ;i 4 I 1 , � ��4 CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ^ �� AQUATICS CENTER a`\ CHEATHAM&s ASSOCIATES --"�, °YM SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS CONSULTING ENGINEERSITT l oYam e5 a v Aa1.4.11,,.rr.;e„115 --'S e1e GRADING PLAN NV,.PM.iera�lnn:e+.ma :.-,o..... .r wo.m.m w v.,.w G C. - � " --__ oa*»ON=' F. cn � '' ---- --~=��~ � -Fl -_- ---- '----- ' ' ~�~�~ ~��� � oOorxsa,mnpw —�� --------- Ui .�..~ UJ � - ui �� r---- --'--- ---- Lu o � ___ cc EAST ELEVATION cc CC '~~to�~�^~ ~���������� ~~~~�'~~~ A CZD ~~~�-~-'-----^-- ---' --------'----_-'i�~ �- CD m WA "z NORTHELEVAmON .� W� TYPICAL FACADE WEST ELEVATION�__ _� ~- 5.2 ��� 8t7-DL k . ;: ...;..0 pt ID I al- l"1 r 41 o l'i ,Z.< ,,111;i:in; 1 0 ill,`ri 01 1 < a. T. a • o - i z • 1 . __-_-i: 11. .- 1 , . ; . .- , 1 & -* . file! 1c)il i!ii ...., 1 r I , ; • 1 - 1 „., HIE I! ;i ,, ' , MIIIININS 1 IF— ' d• ill I I I — IIMIIMMII 1 11 = I '; i - IIMINEN I MOD' 1 <--) I SNOW 1 , :Calm I 1 gi MIIIMMIIII I --'Z) i 11X11:11:1 I l' :I limmil. I .3.amins semis: — I' 1 lc-----, egig• • .,2.= -;.-- ' . I 4,g i i& , 4 ti, 1 11111 ; I LIE 1 i I IF ' i is , 1 i __ • _ ,..,,. 9 9 1 1 ' II Mall i ==ff., 411 -----..-01 I .• 9 9 - MEI Id' ' -( ..! !Rd' _ , 1111111 i a 41111°' '' ----0 g, ;,, i , - -- ,..., m , .. ' _........,i i • ok r• 4,x• . - : i <!.9. ' r.--';. 1 r NMI,--, ® g __ i -• ., z ilia , 0 .,_. INN o. * t 1111 •iii 1 ,_ , . . , • , , . '... 1 1 , ! I 112 -- , is , ...i — k L.is.T.11-3 i ' • i + 1 -'''' IIII I 414 1 Mil '1 -- ' MillIIIMI ':1 ' ', 7 .1117.1. 7.11.1, . I ' ----- - -- 1.. Mill 11' t III 1 : T I - III- ;,. E, 11 CD = _ w _ , _______® MI _ I I a ,r • '1; 0193 1 _ "22; I 9 9 / . 9 - ' 5 0 i o 1 ' x,,-i a-sk a. 9 9 i____ Z 1 I 1 ii 1 ,, J II 1 z 1 I . * I 11111 1 , • 1 1 ° 1 . _...,,,,,, , a i ' b> a> ®- a. Fs, a> .4 tl__ A , I i t.,-. • , 4 a a ' 1 I la) r_c • 4a) I b ., . , ___0 ,- „•,.=,4 - ,,,i-t....,-.1tv,,i,.., '-e'''' ,.. 1 =ft=, , . .... - ' ,L_ 1._ I- ------'Cc! • •,I "a, a • - . ',,,,,'4Ii :. • ...•.- ' ci A, g-, ", _ . )1-1-4 }-,234421 ,.fr, .,..--<- , . "z.t:.'5.- .' ,•44:5 T- ''".74-,: Att 1+ist-41 ,_,_ 1 '4 .-,^ '''', 4' '',,'•,,"^ vi rl ,i'r I r-- , '`' ' ' - -- ' - •••. -14.0,A147e.;.P.4 . -iiilAqi, r•-,.., * T _. __ ,, z ,...... 1..,. ..t..,-...... ' ,,'; .,,, ...„.....-. , .p, , ....,. 'le 4,k•,.",.,;,,,,,,,, . .• ,,4,7.I. - • • _,'7,4:it. : t .4.• ,,Wlei.,,;',$...:`,' ,. 4-IN Y.4'; :,.i.:44'4,- e- isli"4,--y 2`. -4 .-1" - ' ;,,,114,-•••••••••••--•' - •-.`-,' - ' ., 000Z T €; 44.44 d urz i <we..o ewe NV1d A3)1 55 )a 9l __IL 1 Y-- i ,.u-1 I -_ l _.. a F NVld A3N fl. ¢¢Fv. E 1 O y F oyr m I— I!, xi �f 0/ G) r; o m I z = 0 ■mutt -�_ rT 0 m .. 1■■0■ . I. : a®■ i�la ■ ■■■�■.■■■■■w■■■ ■�■■■■■ ■ ■...ts ■ ■■■ ■■■■■w ■■■ ■■ 1 I Via__- g '���¢) F Z N ldO NOI11CIaV 3Hfllfld I NOI1dO NOIlIUclV 3 fllfld J C b C b n O O R .o o so' o'y $ .— TRPREFIN.DAMN FARE 1 R , Y TRPREFW.YETK EAVE P Ra , x 311E A E YNISOIWY VENEER _ -- MASONRY VENEER -- ^MS - —. = —os.ITm.> V ? . _______________._.- 1 ".ra i F 8'% 10.OVERHEAD DOOR `` IIAA ro I CO - - --I ]•%7•H.Y.DOOR J•%7'MY.DOOR \ F.0 —' - __ i— ILI F.F. - ..-- i— CONCRETE STOOP CONCRETE STOOP J O /R Lu- ll'%,o•OVERHEAD DOOR 3 WEST ELEVATION 4 EAST ELEVATION = Z a O 1/4" = 1'-0" O 1/4" = 1'-0" V --I H U) = O el;---PREEN.STANDING PREFW.METAL CAVE TRY SEAII METAL ROOFING Z W T I , IYI IIIII1111 (11111N11 I 11111111111 1111111111111111 II II IIIIII111111111\ 1111111111111f Z - • �MASONRY VENEER MASONRY VENEER CI Ce ILLI I- C CI- U) N 1.1 _ - C Z J 0 J CC C-.-- FF \ ---- --- O.S.(TP.) CC CC Q V CC OSOUTH ELEVATION Q 2 1/4- = ) o V ,OO.-O- PREFW.METAL SAVE PREM.STANDING TRY SEAM CH YETK ROOFING -PIT1:12 IIIIXI I1111111f III1111111111111111111111I11111I111111111111111I1111111\ IIILIIL1111- 111 /MASONRY VENEER - MASONRY VENEER Ilk_- ..._ o /. —_ 3'%7'N.Y.DOOR O_S (,YP.) — qpW MA O N A 000F.F. -- - _ - -—-—- `,CONCRETE STOOP MELT ONORTH ELEVATION e % 10 OVERHEAD DOOR AMAIER 1/4. = 1•-0" a— 1 -- SEC HU BER . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-338 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1460, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND TRACTS 1A AND 1A1 SITUATED IN THE R. J. PADEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1255, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 56.100 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 1 1C-51 t buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBAIPENDING\480-338.DOC Page 2 1C-52 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 3 1C-6$ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts lA and 1A1 situated in the R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 4 Il/54 SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 5 (1C-55 SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 6 10P as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 7 r APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:ICOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 8 • rL r . 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts lA and 1A1 situated in the R. J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255, and being approximately 56.100 acres BEING a 1.75 acre tract and a 1.45 acre tract, shown as Tract 1 and Tract 1 A by Tarrant Appraisal District, situated in R.J. Paden Survey, Abstract No. 1255,City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Commencing at a point for the northeast corner of Carroll High School Addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1460,Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas,and also being in the south right-of-way line of F.M. Highway 1709; THENCE N 89°27'18"E, a distance of 229.60 feet along said south right-of-way of F.M. to a point for corner; THENCE S 01°01'36"W, distance of 608.53 feet,to a point for corner; THENCE S 89°33'S5"W,a distance of 229.66 feet,to a point for corner; THENCE N 00°01'14"W,a distance of 608.09 feet to the Point of Beginning, and containing 3.19 acres of land, more or less. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 9 5q s v 4 x CD o c 3 SOUTHRIOGE ZL�AqKE WATERFORD DRIVE ZONED - PUS #3 - _;f„ „� WENLIT.T� `\`; LUD =MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL E a :;- •• STONE LAKES PHASE I �` C■Avulc � �! m -. I l�_ A e , «""' li Go CAB.A, SL.915 N Ii" I it.�EjT / m S<m I-I ■ 1 E ISIVA(iENEEa / a ��I W •_Ior y.»'` i MY rs\I S 'a ..-',1! *9a I cozy �_TfOR ST'�� '�iEE.Ct c" 0L~i , 1GOm) C� w eu, A. kE `Ir_ .'-/' 'v -.. �l tit u 4.alw SOW Arnw-wr... X Ik EAi f 'K r» bus i rc i \ \61 .w... �-1 Li • . • 1 Tr - k O Li, ■ r i M JJ r�� j'n tt 1��;... a,i.•w.w a.a.,r«.1.r O. L - 1 i 14 i I' I.i _— t;- -,. .�I. I ( ....ma I INN- / )E Wa �!TD E ASEs+§, - I.�.i_J yB€ L F� y�,y S NE LAKES PH ,4,C ~ ? •�1 $ iY-I' ii IlvralL `� 'y,« k MST*E• Ica R ',PONE CAB.A. SL 679A s. ',01011103:IL!MN,e ns a..ur.xar wso. _--- .rewn.w r 11 E Y= $00'a7O5'M.. 4� PRIVACY EEKE ' IIll 1.110.1 Ye N can mnc,m 041015111051053 to�"1111151131. TEl .9 ..V�- _ '��4-n 75. �1 0,S�UEELIT•OO.(�, AN.37: l-A t -II 1r—L J C -__T -) 2 �I C` =1'trD E. P:t M PAFtK�LAC�, _ ' SOiIEALI i1EL• C � 3I! "' e = , ® ® ASE 3 CAB.A,A ISL.2575 .MmuaaawnuonnNM- o _m - r � cmraw.snm18y5 ys1 _ w � ' 5. �� 'g- 5.$N� A - , ,r'. , f 71`.-"' Ili � I Y ' UM NUM nmm�. :Wr.. �R111�T�1T11 � V Pn 4d m I fWtl0 .Y J + E IsrIM E• G,I OK.rrcesum,wini 1 l - ISTWADINC T' ` n.ETT¢rain MI AC)fENL E=4 Ir �z114 �� r.w a•.M.M,LNn �- IIr. MIEN w 'AS III- - SGaODI I �I C..._.))I I mAic i.!'ry. 'ir�, .m --- . . , IIIIIIEIIIIIIII-1 umN II I i A Y^f s t ,O'm•mom [ I I \ - I, I. ' iiii' ;•• , /E �;•� s; ;; �Ib •i■ o '2 I 1 m; nr,rimfl s;1. 1 It I I I�I 1•10 '1 g 1 •a , i10.^ Z m0 I f • t-1 f a .... I [ I '1 I CARROl1 MOH • r '� ,�S J' srrm� ns j.. _1 ;,` SCIO0.AODIiiIM � ' ACT I VI / , -f NI i '� Oi -a •- a 1 Loi I.�OIXt - P I a.r[a I ---� < T ! u,w,w ' E CMLA■IE MO 1 ill EAtEIEM)/Irlr I M+ww J , m ( I r,a ,r uulc Y.¢,naloN 1 ¢,., Ii ' 1. k \ MMi I�a —" ru .. �.0. .OWED MU I z > .I ,::nrOe ,�.IMAM*_ 4 M i } , Y ' , i S.uraln Us[r.Er I -.__.._ �i <$ IL, SI I ? �F 1 . 1 g 1- — - - EIOC.II,, nmiva turix[v.¢t., �s n r } Le,..., T .4 y? , oe i� • • "g I .' alrai�jraf�T _ _ I EI I u SEATING PLrAMaED,Mtn I I .eR A � 1�1 L A4 i a 1` Eg!1, aY l- 4� -_ '� i RECD MAY u 12000 :I,, 1 CAN '�='' —pa Q��aQQss1mtrsslab las _ g rn'lnf E . 1��:°`, '''"7C•pllitf71® pp i i j« 17rn • N 'a,>:'fr'r` - REVISED SITE PLAN l l I�4 I L.LI]• . AM ] 1 I , , A a .lh/ { 11 r i h41Fif (, c,t.rs yi a ' (AICARD: I 1Az �I ' 8"A ',i"5.D1 j BLOCK 2 m I BLOCK • LOT Ea,BLOCS 1 Nil ZONE(tof i C2 I LOT s I V.388-142,p.100 I - I m ! CARROl1.HIGH SCHOOL ADD1170N -T:'3e,.i so•GaEOE Access Esn-.{ • A TO UTHLAIGE r u COUNTY.Mt coy OF irsA { an�yy sA�,,�� BAKER ESTATES .� CAB.A, SLZ9171 i ° �rPoj°�°} i L10""c G'Tbio.A"1bnce ZONED -AG ZONED - SF 20A '°°"°" { I MUTE: LUD =REYA sC�Iirr.4ERCIAL LUD =MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LUD =MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �� .w i J ADDITIONAL RIEHT- -EAY REOLESTE0 FOR PETTINVILLE...NH NHL REQUIRE S 1 9 (0 SITE REDESIGN To CUWDINATE ACCESS. SITE ENO..PARKING cawFIGIFATION. - w) 1 MO LANDSCAPING TO RE REOESIQIE0 TO COOIOINATE EITO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION MOM= 0 C ( PLAITS FOR MLPQSfo TURN LAME. arMPiw. " ,« Mwr weeaM,r AMrsn .Mans)a.1.55.11.54115u mum.Tau 1=1, ° m 11 Mmr I.nr a ,. .T .«, .a ,» .I.. ..a..m)m w,. A. u<,...ea.M a.r«iN w,uw i l«.w«� :S"r,�+rrn..Tu..m:n ;fin ,.':' l..T,:.._I.. NA L01 M =r315 't aw.r nc.men.in,.�...T. _-(in s.-YL N..4 r-ir,. (.nl rw u Nn,051.9 n^. .... ........ -".._ EXHIBIT "B" PROPOSED SP-1 REGULATIONS Title of Project:Carroll High School Lot IR.Block 1 Case No. ZA 99-078 Proposed Regulations Comments I Permitted Uses Same as CS with the following exceptions-allowing for joint use facilities with the City of Southlake. 2 Accessory Uses Same as CS,and adding natatorium,lighted tennis courts,lighted baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales running tracks,practice fields,and indoor training facility. 3 Specific Use Permits Same as CS 4 Development Regulations 4.1 Height Same as CS 4.2 Front Yard Same as CS 4.3 Side Yard Same as CS,except no zero lot line development allowed. 4.4 Rear Yard Same as CS 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS 4.7 Additional Development Regulations Same as CS,except the existing high school Existing trees being saved along residential for building uses lying within 400 feet educational building and additions attached thereto property lines will partially shield the of single family residential zoning. shall emulate existing construction materials,surfaces, building from view and mandatory fire and and architectural style. The proposed natatorium safety external lighting will be directed shall be exempt from vertical and horizontal away from residential property. articulation requirements and the requirements for a 4:1 height setback from existing residential zoning. 5 Concept Plan No Concept Plan shall be required. Site developed as a SP-1 requiring a site plan to be submitted for additional development. 6 Effect of Concept Plan No Concept Plan required. 7 Site Plan Same as CS 8 Special Exception Uses Same as CS N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 11 WI !et N • EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. N:ICOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-338.DOC Page 12 'A City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-045 PROJECT: Site Plan - Costco Wholesale STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: . Site Plan for Costco Wholesale on property legally described as portions of Tracts 1, 2, 3, & 4, W. E. Mayfield's Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 16.3702 acres. PURPOSE: Site Plan approval required prior to development. LOCATION: On the south side of S.H. 114 approximately 1,200' east of Kimball Avenue. OWNERS: Donald E. Vogel, Chung Cheng Hong, Glen Scott Harrell, and Wetzel Family Partnership, Ltd. APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn and Associates CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District PROPOSED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and automobile accessories LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Chung-Cheng Hong, 640 107th St., Arlington, TX in favor. (Received May 31, 2000.) • Michael Wetzel, General Partner, Wetzel Family Partnshp Ltd, 102 Westlake Dr, Ste 106, Austin, TX in favor, "More tax dollars for Southlake&it finishes out the 1st phase on the east end." (Received June 5, 2000.) One (1) response was received from outside the 200' notification area: • J.B. Strahala, General Partner, DFW-Highway 114, Ltd., Box 700876, San Antonio, TX in favor, "Make the best of our Highway 114 Commercially zoned land." (Received June 5, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, and subject to the City Council motion for the Concept Plan. City of Southlake, Texas STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated June 16, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-045SP.doc 1D-2 . , Tract Map ZAOO-045 / `T �VVI�V1 .SAINT \., GREENB 11 , UP,!! . NG O ti r I 1111 , tijas __,_ I - 1 .41P lip . WAVIN 1iI / , 1 / A3 i I _ I ( A _ , 1 2000 0 2000 Feet N A. W / r E S lb-3 Surrounding Property Owners . ZA00-045 A ..... Am mot CITY � 1111 OFdi. ili ° GRAPEVINE '� �I V 11114111111111111111111 1 ] 1 I 5 7 riaik 13 / -09 11 10 9 8 s rN L z a r i _, Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. State of Texas 2. Wetzel Family Prtnshp Ltd. 2. "AG" 2. Mixed Use 2. 1.66 acres 3. State of Texas 4. D.Vogel 4. "AG" 4. Mixed Use 4. 3.94 acres 5. Mobility Systems,Inc. 5. "AG" 5. Mixed Use 5. 1.76 acres 6. D.Vogel 6. "AG" 6. Mixed Use 6. 4.78 acres 7. Mobility Systems,Inc. 7. "AG" 7. Mixed Use 7. 5.76 acres 8. D.Perry 8. "AG" 8. Mixed Use 8. 2.99 acres 9. G.Harrell 9. "AG" 9. Mixed Use 9. 4.86 acres 10. C.Hong 10."AG" 10.Mixed Use 10.2.99 acres 11. Southlake Office Prtns.JV 11."AG" 11.Mixed Use 11. 1.05 acres 12. Liberty Bank 12."AG" 12.Mixed Use 12. 1.13 acres 13. Lowe's Home Centers Inc. 13. "C-3" 13.Mixed Use 13. 14.72 acres 0 VIN 0 VICINIT MAP __- - - --�- —,_— ^"xr ■!8 DATA■1tIOJA&Y 03ARTY ❑ ❑ a��y ... &ASSOCIATES ❑ 0 -'— .0- ____ ____ _----.._.____._..______"----- ---------- --„... . • ,, I 0 ui••I-- yrrAa _ I SSA 11A.E.IT MILL ROAD Suite uS 0 DAUM,TEXAS Mu 0 use o \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�ao���\�e��\w��a\\ � t+�v V..r _ ,,,or ..r., �,o .�. �_ •r 0 ...,en...•<,. 0 rlw Ilillllrr •. • • — + • -ri i � �\\\\\\ •\\\\\\\\\\\��� % !%///�//y • H/////T I/svy�T c MY.MCI -ar. r u. . FL' I� -as_ V •c ••r. rr r.r'a �- _ 61�C� O. v W Aa- TWA. .-. • loyal Y•a•• 1IIIIRhlIlInH11flhahi1II arx ao•••••YA *.-r•w®MO an.•a•.n R&M MYRar. a d _.� — 1NA!]6F _ �HfHH tim roam '� gill - - nrrr o•a.• •>.• uwu. ❑ U t w G d❑ ' �'_ IJlluhI�HIII rI InunIlI� I --- I — r-1J C] VOL.VOL 1.no.MS •or,SM.. L n •..Laa uUSE ❑ O W Or, <.4❑ ' `, = Sw n 1''I'I �t���y M-1 ' :�.,= • $ 1/' wLr.5 :i ro� a.mnv.•rwc.oaw� i •cao u. V tyUV ,' TRACT B '_ �IIiIIIIII111fI11■ 3 "r wl> R SWaU.•rIA11M9•Y YIEOI- ❑ ❑ _ wLm Ra1t,I•certMA.wA ••Ien u•E ,,,1IIYij ,I�"11,1IIII� _ VOL x R *MROOL aMN.lxxYY Iin.O Ulf ■ — r [- ■9��C "rTTrrTTIRi • � y — VOL aermrwa...en w•..Lm uurtnua MOVE Ara WE WV u• �1♦!OO �' 111111 NN1f. LATII 4� i A '.far •a ano•m•M A • r --a TiuZsraT :, Lr." .4*" . 1. ikti. ._ ,v'i 7-- • . „00. - ---I -----2.- - I i it q e MUM 3 —,r,:ur . j An. . illll� z� IrlrI �-.• e�Ii --I:7111111111111k. ❑ ..re e I �• `iaa/riy//�, ,t- ` o!'rgnaPPUCAl±r NI r Ik CO r !— �` N/�/ r"' l!1 • �/r�� a"' c1 0 o c ❑ Snma!WWI mwtr �.—• ` il/y�l /M _ % •n Neer omu R(o-,7 PR I 9 y'Il m y�ri=',I. P o u wAm'-• ❑ CO NC PT PLAN 1 ,•., C7 PREPARE-It ❑ •..-I•A•aoAr• .PC... \ n ua Duna 001400110 ma WA umy •■■f •.. li Ac•O°` Enu 1i e N. ❑ flAu•.r.e LJ I .1 1��Cr. I wl�,wStadieSciAt .c.sNu,e.e. ,L.11 '.'> ?IL•ssm • 1 PAL swrsa 11.01 AMJoI>nw ❑ ❑ VD MAY 2 5 200 YU 44 RII-AATOr Braollt _ :r. . .w1 m-EAI a.0 An / �•ara••WWI•(ION 0 SHEET NO. 0 • ,fly NM'GINS all ICI 0 CP1 ❑ MUM 0.41010.1■ ■ I • ■ ■ .... PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ate- — _ pl — — — STATE NW No. t 114 SI iE ... I Y 3 a ci . . --�b �s9 58„ _ — 9>`,7g OJT 1 1 I11 -11111U1111 _ ; _ fin--_ s951F7� - HB6W'�3E GRAPHIC SCALE a; I — -- -- F ll.u'- IVIMRI 1 Y•• 1 , iiIihPIiuyc ._ �p� 10 W A L I ' \ ,• 10" I `f-Ii -VV , L_ aooW ;(1f I I , i SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART 0 a a w t x R I �� 11 milt] , ,,I„_,„ GROSS ACREAGE: 14.37 ACRES/713,077•L w W..7,'1 ,'I I,.. PROPOSED SUNNING AREA 1LS,NW d ji cO \ I Jp,�' 11 'I(�I� p I I�� .1 I-. ' PRONGED PARKING V01 Y7 �I I e ^, COMO" St J\ I L!I !U 6J U�1 I ' =i I y I Q I f STANDARD 732 `�/ I. I= 148,663 SF j .. a I IIIII I I ! :' i' ,s- HAAL NDICAPPED R;R — I I, REQUIRED LOADING SPACES J 1 fFy y,,—�ry- �'""' I 11 PROVIDED LOADING SPACES _ .� �.. 1 I A Tir� I I.... .I Q ._ � fHHH I I a 11-11-11 i= ' �, . a III ,. .__.� _ ' / b./ (L 1inive; / / --.: ,,I, • -- -IIII[I.41011111111111N111 {�111901i110180111111111� / �g 1 .3 sumo.Lac 4 _ _ l�� Ii I J r 700 =ea 1 Q, _._ ./ / /$ cos rCO NHOLESALE R1 I Tr:e ir 3....p.... 0 j=, I nI __.. ..I .L',I,.�3C3'.'1 Q\\ -o„,...-..:. •-- --- __�.a..._ sNEe11j1 4j w i APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY • Case No.: ZA00-045 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 06/16/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Costco Wholesale Development, Gateway Phase II APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Costco Wholesale Kimley-Horn Associates 4600 Manekin Plaza 12700 Park Central Dr., Ste 1800 Sterling,VA 20166 Dallas,TX 75251 Phone: (703)406-6882 Phone: (972) 770-1300 Fax: (703)406-6835 Attn: Larry Harder Fax: (972) 239-3820 Attn: Phil Fischler CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/13/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 1 Residential Adjacency N None Building Articulation Y Complies with Approved Concept Plan Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies 410 Bufferyards Y Complies with Approved Concept Plan Interior Landscape Y Complies with Approved Concept Plan Driveways Y Complies with Approved Concept Plan Lighting Y Complies 1. Identify materials on the "Front Elev. A of the Controller Enclosure" for the gas station. 2. The following changes are needed on the graphic/site plan: a. Revise the surrounding property information to comply with the approved Concept Plan. All pertinent information associated with this site appears to be consistent. b. Provide easements as required with the plat. c. Remove the notation "Concept Elevations" from the elevation sheets. d. Note the property owners on the plan. Costco is the "developer". 411 1D-1 City of Southlake, Texas * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 and 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Phil Fishcler, Kimley-Horn and Associates VIA FAX: ABOVE Larry Harder, Costco Wholesale VIA FAX: ABOVE Greg McGahey N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-045SP1.DOC 11 • 2 City of Southlake, Texas • TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-045 Resubmittal Date of Review: 5 — 11 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Southlake Retail Center, Lot 2, Block 2 (Costco Site Plan)Resubmittal Review #2 OWNER: PREPARED BY: Costco Wholesale Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 4600 Manekin Plaza 12700 park Central Drive, Suite 1800 Sterling, VA 20166 Dallas, TX 75251 Phone: (703) 406-6882 Phone: (972) 770-1300 Fax: (703) 406-6835 Fax: (972) 239-3820 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant did not submit the required Tree Survey with the submittal of the Site Plan. Please submit the required survey showing all the requirements as outlined in Schedule A and B of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. An aerial photograph with the development overlay was submitted and is correct. 2. No existing trees are proposed to be preserved on the Costco site. The submitted Grading Plan shows grade changes across the entire site that would facilitate the removal of all existing trees. The only possible areas of existing trees that would possibly need to be mitigated is the landscape area within and adjacent to the south bufferyard. The area is not a R.O.W., public utility or drainage easement, fire lane, required parking area or building pad site. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and • the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. BUILDING INSPECTIONS City of Southlake, Texas * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this lot. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. BUILDING INSPECTIONS 7D-10 --a— i Se STATE' HICHIy'AY Sr —Y` °� No. 1>4 (VAR/A... REER/rx/rcrwAp .1ti y es>r'E ^'�.M.AVM,h1A1Y ..�,. ' 3 T ` axlr So• ..TAYY N Et. "a Bta ■ ICI �� �� ��� mom d� ■■ ..Tr e -- m SITE / GRAPHIC SCALE � ]C .. i• ps" we � :'^ T,,�.0' ../ mzw a .".- j—. as:¢,A - <<+Ci� IID 5__`,,:;-a ;a .i'�r` to" .. �`I Isr N' I(rsnv, ❑ A II: I. ,. fE°1 ® e'St..'-r ABU — -I.r- .1L a,_. —---1"" 1'2 VICINITY NAP MI TO -- i _yam 1 - - _ I _ •L✓ �9�1 IlU IIY �. _ LEGEND " t; 1 ; I -- - JL YY is S. I I. SUMMARY CHARTS-BUfFERYAROS T--I - \epr,I, ® !.D ®D Lo�S T® - v�/ r. r... .��..�.v !1 I ME L.xE I an M^ yy j rr"'.n A Y... i ^ \ . ^-, �� .z. .4. '-sr .I ��� i J[I J I I .w.-. w 4;i 1 u a .o y 1 H rI IN [IIll a • II1Ies. Pw.cT/`` �( R.E mA .[ 4 �. a {I1. m Y '+�•• >• . Si Y... r mt Eld 84, I a f O Q DOUBLE roLE I W 1 ( tit ��I� or z.BLOCK z _ , � f'� , �• .". :•aa7, +sm.. 6 'ao.E01SEE 11.0 4 i nJOBA sau we FEET , j �.w w. rn1 My a r.�ram of 11^ IC.JIOI ORES _ ... I�r I^ ........w.� 1 Q ... ...E•a.Y.M 'z. I . .. I, .a'1 Y -1'-- ! T�I B �8 Isoeuul°`uw (% _a I x I y : I - SUMMARY CHARTS-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE W Q.p i 2 3 iC _. i ..I""!' 14 A V RI i l -i.., •,`^'~ i.„i..; rd O C W .1.A.1.. 1IF I r i .0.,.1ct:psico as— 4E"- ' "' R �;� f ; . .. . H, a: Z e•r A M T I i� Od .. -1 E¢( I. _ il' x N I A..,, i �Mr01l.Ne/ � ��sI1N� A YA I , ( (I YI a �I I I i= I= 148,663 SF - -J ' -' --- O 4 F Al I. m 7 STORY BUILDING i -J }1 • _ ii ' +� UORRNG SCHEDULE V F O I i j RETAIL � I '' " 1 I 2' i I NH .RMA aY =J { T .. d �� " � •� / �'1°r- aa ® Ya..m ...1�.. 1M,.Y.. ..A rr. "i.."�" .Ly. V% d .r • r., I ,f A / i '/ J- '.., 0 1.1'f'cr.:-.Immo _____ kz4 i ems' t' i, K Y 'IV : art / MirIBIY11 rig- a. / I MM. ....my,.,.�r....:. .+ /, SITE DATA auu■w■r CHART vRrRAL Noas �.... same...;. A _ — ; Q rMD.verso.OM...MO mII POTARTM13. 1=41 TTun �6 rt� yq ;, -; I ` �} ` '�" F i Mil lltldule ll6@u1v 1911� : 4' _MM1 MP .e Hass O�l A e Yw Ng:III '4 .t� I-�L- '''--. y r"c%s.' -—_ ="�. sa'4� r'� j 1.. o.....L..� .e._.,w«.. If 00211.3. �T� s tt +I I r,o".1.qx t _ 26 StJv LOTr eronrz ; "/.mammy' I / y - .w n. .1..L....M...a,a11..1.....11. .>. "` 5� r' I I Tzzes SQ QE FOOT lI. • mm �, Y btnt¢ m,Yan AnYEs 1./ mama L as 1 I ,mama_.. 11. / ;.��/ wMEM........_.. M. uwY.®.nm.n.fam..ar .w DATUMS .. - • I - MIOo0Y0 CANmAT ( K°PoYD,n�I .A. YrA..o.ns[uv...x..Y.c.rwY[ Q r._ Nm nr. I. - COSTCOEtiYHOLESALE `\ hSit`�. \ / •. Y IN L Y.CK 1 6ATYIAr PUPA AMMON PRATE II i m .,d \ • � % I -� ' IlT LIef11■1■MS }n a Ti .. ` �/ / 1/RIOI.W RURvtr.AMITACT NO.STa AND 2 'A -.rya .519a. 'kfaT. `_. I I CRT OF OUTH/r.ssm SURTAR ANT COMITY. Y.TOLLS a .1 T `.�� / / / mama.. Y_ CRY OF sPVTrrL.YN TAaARr CYIUIRY.18YA9 . u u AL ORTIM' �Fa(l\gp(f �a`—` ��l i:` r ..11.111.013...A MIME COSTCO RtIOLESACE �n wMryMun oSHEET J� - \ \ l/ / III ! I I /^�: �;5� *� - _ —'- _ _,.._____ L—\ \ T` ,, . --- / / 11 / I \ I;\` " -�A � " lam\_ '�� „_ `� I I I %=a ti, ,.,\ ,„ / o to •_ Y —_ ��� :. - / i_, 1 1 /,JVd I I /\\F ACCESS ROAD <k'e„$i,J..,�� \ \ =���\ - / "����a�- -��.. •� bra° llfiLii7/� r 1aI \ �a���� `� \ \\ 1 — / ^I — N fr S� GRAPHIC SCALE _.� r"i irirQ°em rs�: \ '�.� \\�V\\\\ / / \ ro \\ ram:. ,�1 / .:,* _. «, 1, ,.!/ / - Y fi 'h" _1 II L ir \• 1p ` ( \ \ � � \ \��♦ / 1 �� / /1 / lx"" s, 9 '. �� `ram / I f 1\ \.\ I \1 1 iti • 1 d . - \1" / \ v\ � \_\ \ Lt."\ 4: • , Y•tom' '" ..x.,Iyy ' / I --Y.! i T�\� / �I\\ 1. I\\ :,�: '� .- sue ' ! p r••r i/ r y/,'/ I , � `\y-- \ ll \i \1 I2 I\ �!�il �`: 4 1OUSIMI7 /�,. / I1 //.• / ... 1 1 */ T I�\\ 1 ',/," \\\ I � o_ ,«�m.a. ,.. 4 .; _ '/ �!r /// 4,, ( / s / Ir \ I \\\� \ i ,I I ..vim., W - / ra.e \ �� \ 1 l III \ I, / -\ - �// /// , .,\•y- / //I.�/ \\\..1 \,• .,\\\ \ T ��;_ b. q« .mp �ci<w ::s--_-----__ i - L. `\\ 1 _._ \`/ ——/ /< rod y i...\/_ 1 l i/ ...\—��...,_ \'�`tli .\ \\\\ I\ }--�F—^ O a m F i\1 ` a® � ' " \\\�\-\--\` - "--- / " Ivi"'= /' "/ ii -•;"•v °-� _ 1 "'', \ \`111\ill / - �• , -" .n. 3w<mI,� / _ 7 d fi/i i// x.° \ I 1 II y -t- <P°kq yy tU .','""`Cjl ,J� 'i•''+ \ tiaras / --- / ,:/ / ./ / / _ r : k ifil / i bW///�.-,. \\\ O \ -, / �- / r% nw ' - ! l/...e•l.,j wr,: I/ 1 .1. F I I t 1L II\\\ lk .,a,` 'a C."� \ --�� /�T--� i r` �. III& 4� 1II\' —FT"64 50i / i ✓e /• p. poi I I Imo/ / I I / 1I I 'l I i�\i=_— -' _ '/i / , /y/ / r � llll •IM+II111 1 r ` \`�% -/ —',i—'J rsf _�� J� ,.�1 \mm \ . Y�/ � '; ' 4 r I /// / %l//!/ 141((�� itif _�1111/Ill/ �G i1 Ali 7 / \\ 1 / //'/j i \X ' r // ,R- l) /Y`�1'f'6/' / / I I.. s— I\�---A"---;--:-"' g 1 I6 a.•.L, —/ '/, • .// ,5- = )a,. /!.. _.. ��/ / //// // 1 tip :\ 1\ 1\\;J/ /// LEI Q�I 44-4 , � �; ;�--- 1 , �. �.��s� i s / (� I I\ 1 / /I @� 7444, ,I Aw �v .l�. ,,, / ,�. r - 1- ,( r•' c•/j_- I 1 1�1\ // Ill/ d @�fr < ` �.,r t... 11 // P/ / ka.' /) a....n�•* j /4° °.- 1....1 1. 1.1 .� \ r/ (l//l I f a\1110411 h111 \--„�% III. y', v� -- _ -.. ..., I r r /r/ / l.__. IIIIIIII I\� -i///l1 r 1.1W3a.. mura.�. - .y ,r I' \-: r l J ! r/ ( I p l 11\\�\\�\\ //f( f�(/f$ i I m..u»R. l .yx - �y_ ice \\ lr\s� ; / C T.,`_ v r _ c„N tl / ..i i ... \ t I / '%� / 1 1�« mew..,\ ,`', ,M ,, �\ \ , \ \(�\ \\ r i 1 '-',)/,'€)r 1€ ^ i mil/ ; / "I \ \',& > \ �'k \\;\ . \ ,;\\ I \ / • �a ,�. }/ ,- • f \ �.._\ \ \ �( I i I �'. T <.r - , ' , ; i�E�VQ,J�J N 0 2 2000 r � / \ .><\\\ \ /( / 6 ooIS �. .'� s 8 l �..\ I/\\ \ \ / \ I \ SriEET iiil° V j •w (' �� .... r .a.jam/ / \ r \\ %� \\ t\ r\ al/ � 4f I \I I i «..•.«.... ...s.�.a. .n«.� 2 0 0 0 zo ;iii Q 0 Q ::: 0 Q 0 �a . - ��Nosammii 't� - i I ==iri ,i� . /I� �nlri�lwn . WI ,ICI j jc'Ild I f2 p3:,0 "13' ° . .C C I -A �ueeml 'PI R A �•� I ?i mi,ii.it i Ihnli r _ _._ ____ ____ 1 ,4 ; l � - i i , l _ J [ - . I . _- ; ,., I P OEAST ELEVATION WITH PLAN .a w Q Q °© i ! 0 y ! 0 0 et ' p� CASE NO.ZA 00-045 I //,14,„J I I-- _� � - ----I -_- -I j J - -.F — cosTco ii E.,_ ._ -- Q I C. I W` I SOUTHtAKE C TEXAS U A 2 C I MITCHELL C.SMITH ®: I w t OSOUT REED JUN 0 2 2000H ELEVATION WITH PLANSCALE.I/IA.=r-v CONCEPT COSTCO WHOLESALE ELEVATIONS DD3:INS SOUTHIAKE, TEXAS JUNE 01, 2000 98-526A HIGHWAY NO. 114 THREE LANE —" —_OFF RAMP SERVICE ROAD v � jo A ::::---gji, iii' I r • }� _� : t- WNW MO Sam ace manes LOVES _.. .H r r r.yam- - flfint Gln Ik t aH11HH1f0111 r 1141HHHitH QM iii' , m ��-® - r r r j- 01-HHHHIHIO a1HIHN10 _ . ... .... YCQ �?�...�..,�.�.., = aHl HIHIHNIro HIM _ 1 } �" 1 _k�-" '` 01H HIINHRI G111111119 / af4 . . e.�. --, -.—. � - , .' �� 1// Jn�r ma,SFr ea elvnna4 OcanKLa ecl6.ue e.+.aiA 6C/n.wD ‘-' g 1 *U.yr 7, FUEL TRUCK ROUTE ®►S® ELEVATIONS SCALE I/8' I rr C7IP I -rTh . 7 ' I _R_7 _ a.CAKE,_ II I CASE NO.ZA 00.045 .� 9 COSf1G0- , , , •QOJ i I i-FM+F —m- J I` SOUTMIAKE♦-u � I n �� I' KE SOUTMIA ,T% f y _ 1 8 I — MITCHELL C.SMITH --J -�3 gIl1111VH111111R1 _ ilr DETAIL SITE PLAN ®® SCALE-es . REC'D JUN 0 2 2000 _m -----CONCEPT COSTCO GASOLINE GAS STATION DD4.05 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 01, 2000 98-526B • • 0 r Q K „„= .4 I �F� so' a -1 ix.. w.01 e +' 11111941 _ roc E ; �' ..tip .. • ;..�a i r I�E ie 1;�M .o �.F oi k h .11, ibill VvLI (3)LOADING DOCK STAIR 4 RAILING Q--- .>.>e wwor... e... 7771 0 _ * v...K. 0 ; • m... O "% II 4u_ 1J f^ II AI / ,. + yy o 11 II SGREEN •LL O NORTH ELEVATION WITH PLAN ®w�'^^� }}}iwo..m maws L r:ry a e e o v e15 ^9 i m IT COM�OAKmawM'~~„ \ If.... .. CASE NO.ZA 00-045 c-- 1100 `--- SOUTHWCE TEXAS o�oTUlvo�000�edoe`,J. ..��.eoo ddo odood�o�oo Wo 1-1J ��\�``� MITCNELLCSMITN 0NESTT ELEVATION WITH PLAN JUN 2000 �E CONCEPT COSTCO WHOLESALE ELEVATIONS DD3.TIONS SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 01, 2000 98-526A HIPPED CONCRETE— eno TILE ROOF -F _ II _--F- C E.1.F.S.TO MATCH 1 11 '1 AT__-LMAIN BUILDING Z_�- r CULTURED STONE (11%I SPLIT-FACE CMU NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE ELEVATIONS HIPPED CONCRETE © TILE ROOF nO ' —� ,— —. E.I.F.S.TO MATCH i �J MAIN BUILDING fl IJ —_ CULTERED STONE u — SPLIT FACE CMU CASE No. 00 oa5 -r i :c- f CoiTco S_ - -. -- SOUTMLAKE B VD ANDSM.III — :., T. _ �y _. L��.�--� 11 I 6 1`l SOUP-RAKE,TENS _ 1 1 LL (,I.:6 o ) L,'�-r 1-,`-1-�- ri MULVASVY EAST AND HEST END ELEVATIONS �Jtl�� �d� ., ,_.,,a,,,„ Rat COSTCO GASOLINE ELEVATIONS DD4.04 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 01, 2000 98-526A • City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-063 PROJECT: Resolution No. 00-66 - Specific Use Permit- sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption - Tom Thumb STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) on property legally described as Lot 2R1, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 7.691 acres. LOCATION: Generally located on the northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNER: EPIPD- Crossroads Square, L.P. APPLICANT: Tom Thumb CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; movie theaters; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor _ miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Robert and Suzanne Harvey, 910 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, TX in favor. See attached letter. (Received June 5, 2000.) City of Southlake, Texas P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved(4-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the limited scope of this request and the fact that no changes are to be made to the previously approved concept/site plan, no new review letter was generated. This site is subject to all conditions of the previously approved plans. Attached is an exhibit map for the site. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-063SU.doc The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake, Planning and Zoning Commission, 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake, Texas, 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 00-063 I ai�m� 1 (in favor of) (op osed to) (undecideed about) e request for the following_reason`s:f e atz) e-72,i ,P,-._x9t) _4..1-ei&) ‘72,t-'7. :(elee2led- Zee-L-1 e24,i- -77 ,i,z....i, .izezeilZale---'ecopw_W"le- lay.-drr ,- '.' 'sue,/ -,. SIGNATURE: " ei_, 1 ' i" e :?-;z % 'J ',, 'i:2� 474.0 -,e,7- y--- (Please Print Name) / ;, f .. _St n1 4P. NG t ✓'I4 2 ,f s�y //1� C� ADDRESS: /:° C.�.. "--(41' �• PHONE: 9/7 ,9, 7c ***THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL*** d ,� :, , ., >* ,, A.e bra /'oe.a4 / // , /1' t 1 tei.-�G ' - .� 12-6, �Z ode-t) , ,/‘ .L ) jam- i r'Y - i _-e---", )Ati-et-Z) et z -e- a_ u 'erz-e-- . --7/.,e/ .a#.41/62.6eeer' - -) ,e-,e.etl- , "-,-/-4. 9`ems // ," . - (;`,/‹.-c/.7 .aae .e070.777e07-'4_,) ..e.t1-) ?/-1-ee-A. y- ,/e., ,e_e) ,:et,2/,'-s, -7, ,, .- ‘,4:tize- ey-ye,,,-2.,.,18.,..) if ,- ...e-e 4..„,,3 ,-)gewt, 7-,,,t-,,,,,),(2,,d:e.,,,,.) 444,A,-„,,,... ,e-,:-/<:,, )7,4./.."..e..."_,,,- ' ,,, _,., 7 ..,e-7 ,,,,?-' ,. 0-„_-, -,,tr/ , x--,.., ,,,,,,r,„,,) 6,2egZe--el 4 ---il i tle,,ae- f,,_,. IS-702-, -4=, . .;,17- (Z re-e---)( RECD JUN 0 5 2000 -76-3 • Tract Map ZAOO-063 /111ti;irOAk1 L..1417�� .-u4r0*4;im1.pl ae.,indj,:igi nr:.:4-,..IO0i M0.iw4.Ri:.i.I-1.'I'.A4.4V.„II.TS iI,rA,l ,Pr„.Vr oA 0o ti Fi-TF.iiri1l 1 i!1i6!A 11l11 M•Em 0 #igt s. 4. !R■P All Na 1 1111 ..��: _ 3E4:1 ■ ■■■■m1111..►?i ter=/10 ■r.Mr ii11(5l• ■igov 'irx•ws �■■ 11 ,► .� _'•11/i\IP!!I�111rg 1 I ' 1 I IWtl �� I■ r� ,..4 1 ■F\!� I l l l l l ilrell 11111 RIM MI A kkagrelitil lir l .. ll►: '� 011 g \ 1 �n - - %mks s1�� 4 Elm�liklill I.r. ,' •' ■ W ,r stabio.412-- -- . ,tiro sswetualor -L•■ n, ,\I/Am& •• . ,,.tt.,�.-damn .agate !m► ION m rots►►o, ► .•NO mum :01 R " �1 III 01 a\►1t .. �.►►���4 olio " . ,i 9G;1►*r;i;r'r Will l�N�? rm Al i ��A,���� ■/� %�/ U.�1!Gl-EST '?rf N/ ��j Plo ,<<���':, Ems' �I �1■1_7 �i l ' ter. u>P _ z..tl�- Ann 2000 0 2000 Feet N /� W / � E S Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-063 ` LJVEFNR' - : :� . . .- - NE a 'IBM vim 1Inv -- Plink L . omits al ma -LI_ 1I,,jiI!mIi 11iI 1 f1rpijUUIII - \. _____ -____ g, 13on g 12 II - 15 ■ Pau lq rilivin ' Il. ' � 'iM►511111igI MIIIPwl ., r 'AM NW r MM.• Ik . uuI• II • atp' _ II U-1 �. V 1 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. City of Southlake 1. "CS" 1. Public Parks/Open Space 1. 4.83 acres 2. City of Southlake 2. "CS" 2. Public Parks/Open Space 2. 1.00 acres 3. R.Harvey 3. "SF-1A" 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.06 acres 4. D.Mullman 4. "SF-1A" 4. Low Density Residential 4. 1.00 acres 5. C.Coons 5. "SF-1A" 5. Low Density Residential 5. 1.00 acres 6. R. Boyd 6. "SF-1A" 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.15 acres 7. EPIPD-Southlake#1 7. "C-2" 7. Office Commercial 7. 1.73 acres 8. EPIPD-Southlake#1 8. "SP-2" 8. Retail Commercial 8. 0.90 acres 9. G.Lechler 9. "0-1" 9. Office Commercial 9. 14.11 acres 10.First American Savings Banc 10."SP-2" 10. Retail Commercial 10. 1.17 acres 11.Wyndham Investment Prop Inc.11."SP-2" 11. Retail Commercial 11. 1.17 acres 12.City of Southlake 12."SP-2" 12.Retail Commercial 12.2.86 acres 13.W.Evans 13."SP-2" 13. Public Parks/Open Space 13. 1.68 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-063.doc - _ GENERAL NOTE �f�a.ofw \MeMIY•V PPTOP0.9®6RE DATA 3) PCOP06®!E DATA B NMAIN111.111111iii , ..uanl6s <"rs TOM T1a►B LLO/52+31 ECKERDS 0.01E a+6) r __ T 0 .T .�.� �% . .Ano'a+e'S »3�r 1f-ter„* 1 ACRE _w•rf•.. 1 NIOI'O®SETE TABLLA11016-CC6ISNED PROPOSED SITE TABULATIONS 6 ACRES TRACT TWO TOM TANS(LOTS 2+3) ECT:EPOB ILOT9 51 6) ,AJAR TRACT ONE OTT OF SOUTNLARE I •r•• w_ A�.m.m w.. OTT OF SWiN..AKE VOL.IDOJRA6.PO.22a I __ .P.'>..C y " a. VGL.103.6,PC.276 ZONED-Cs n •»sys.ct: !••fsct �r D.R.T.C.i. L.U.D.-P0(1CC PARKS/OPEN SPAC� td rP...,P • NNAOA. ZONED-CS •:I••p•rroNCO •sN PAtIS _— _ L.U.D.-PURLIC PARKS/OPEN SPACE , 141410•00n3l00 ,VCRS I .01/..01111041101 wd.N... 12w01 N eY16•]6Y 51615 ""�'L 7 ,� uma' rrml WS= 6•al6>sa.R E'•A ' I IVALl,a_ �T u6n„ARAL 6 1® >w w W[a161.Ds &.J4 x I:., f.,l 1, 1 11 LOT x Newts my M.. ..r ..n P.•.M- Q�•L Y`- I II o — -- IA6ML P.Troa1. .. I r — . w I I i ✓; „ n66e ioao arse s x M..1.N�.I .#x .. ..]w a. +1i3 PPEnous xcsl PARCEL OF LOT 2.MOCK 1 I! ,(,..' uUnia•�• �� j,``, .- (-�� W`�""4"«°.'"�'"r'°r�°P""r"'•`�� �j iO BE AP (O TO CITY OF SW 111LAKE a �/ �, fe..6. 1M _ 4) ow.0001.011S 5 $II a/� / ...""• W•DMe••i 'T '• �nla✓:n�..w�< o°z:..ar:m,a A =1." j,:/' >~` �, ... ... .M„a.. r...A, ,,„...M •r,<...MwNr PROJECT I i x1S�rr Y+'`` +'° j� ' .P <o. .u,...P.. .�. FOR Jy1� ——-- ��.i.i'�16 'a.�\±R _ w I--^-E! .j LDl 3 "[�" ;®E R CAM WI A. MMULLIM EW W G y'` KLoI i�eLOEK zie K 35xa • � �l I�:I4 -�- •'�-'^ _Y _ If� P. .® .. ' NORTH AMERICAN d1dV _ PROPERTIES FIRST ANERICAN SANNCS SANK AODN I� mow. 1� ±_ • ,. I w_- I PRELN.PLAT VOL.106.01•PO 1626 m..•s ' ~ " ._—_ 1 • P R TCO.TX. ..., VR r ' •• ,-_ __ .- -..'- ry. .f i� 3 ••�n•�PR wP.e MI.wnraa.r.or.e..v 000..4 vw5 MGM laridrrrt BaAer6T6 ZONED 5-P-2 I !�.711 Nw�r. " I_ ���wo'rmvr s R.I..x5 Subs 9U0 L.U.D -RETAIL COMMERCIAL .�,.:�.� 0'1 '—I „ . _ �.. Q I 1 . .'' r - 1 =c -�/ BLOCK 0 ENT.T•m>52.0 ���•r••� ttiJv7 'S. , f• I— ''\ ' • 0 / DIAMOND ORCLE ESTATES SECOND INSTALLMENT _mm. ti ; SQ.3a6-1al•PO.69 ,astr I , ^—I.� w- �,NEDS T'RE ❑.a.W� .A ECKERD'S Wf.l1t oaiL .sue RNRQ IDi6 IaoLaa,• 1 _ i� `a r -- - • -__ ` 'E- ' � §C L.U.D. L MOOLLIAL 0 W,PM. AND �•" • • — I �"- ' 2 t OBE RE R '- _- p 1,NNA••••IC•..,R=.•c surrov.•n "' 3_ LOT. ❑MASS PEW TOM THUMB ,,., .j¢ _ RoPLT eainw0 jI - ❑.6... .Y.f....PP..e CENTER 4 cd O SNGLE f L 1 -- 66 O.6a5. IM. L Z `\�_`, x ❑,1—' ='"M,ow•o PAR, _ > .Ii WTI' - �y L .s<rz ' �_�i F« J --. pon..ermas . c..P....... RENOVATION Y•• 61s —.■ fn.TC1 \ ''I M'�: L t.... 4 1')„P,r.v,.W ]I ;B ui� RES(]6'T" �4) ill. --1 j, I I /r LOT T �T w.I. [.w pr.. W f.• _ I. i now B_ _ w • IN 1•r1 w.11... N 1MafE CHAPEL BLVD ........! 7 i • u.D1 \K I .•„7,..... •-•{S 1,, f /�Y4 n>ra-uw1.. mum !-. - j •S:. a aa. Saw(O..I1 n:::: SC.RI4AKE GL'A `�r• SPLOT a .. =I i \\, t s;'r '-i' I " c® it j sanwixe lEans .., .• 1 tLM44. r.J' •1•wr \\\ - 5suer •- `pti-... gi Il ..u..r.w N.PSPP r , 14114.11100.wv.. 1 vrc..e ,.....w I I .¢ \\\'` " '�, +, 1 i 1' . °7'i^ �I , eulyio T� -.� 1 11101 MAI.1.0..a n0,vR•. --TEw i .fa , '�'/ t _ �.,r. �•�,` 11a.1P - r.�M-� REVISED ziatrEMS Of AO AMIM OR IIIIM AM ........•..•01214,..,•.... :..� no. = / I I ri. L7 SITE PLAN 1 8: —1' gm' `.,rr' 4. !:" �' ww.HALL I — 1� '� _ '"r;....N0.681 MO NA 9�lE T-� ■ NEW CONSIRUCTIONNMrOR I Y 'I —`F-- -, -__ a"�.,� Zorxn-OI .....o.: .:.'•'.:a.'n'.«.'M.v'."..o'.`. :�''°' I 4. �� R _ NOT INttuoco T.Le1LA I j x — .... .- -'._ /.t. • �;,.... Luo -WWI _ _.,. �. u n I .._ . 1 ; - ALL:TN. _- --- • -1.1: I _.A�..1._ _ - , ^ - COMMERCIAL _R�...!'-- 1 .IBT"S l■ o, — _ ._--- L------- ----- `ram -' I_ �•1 '.E.r A - aI'o?i1e `s i•'.-s3e'W-' )- 1 ---•�_:, •*—:- .. _� RA. n. P .. N. m 4i :' I / -.-� -�.., 'as n-01T1r11- •"`fir l R_m,.'u-� ro<i _ r'i e1 ... __a_____.er!• Pa 1.1.•E.•1••ar tem r w..rM -1 i»,A�+` 5 61�S .16>.29' �' r"; A•s•5 eT30'vr 6 `�.-s W'>e'Ia-w 2949 Ter tl1, —_ARE_JS--- 6Nu N.K+11 w• w..1�1a. x S 1 dSa Y C.l.S 631 co ]]t.' i 66.63' .MI -- PMlsT AIERLOT .BLOCK BANK ADON. �. 111 OTS 5 6:6 TO BE --� • —S6tlT11LAKE 80 EVARD(FM 1709) CONVERTED TO A SINGLE LOT CASES ZAN-134 CAB P R.SLOE O. 025 VARIABLE ROTH RO.w -CONCRETE PAVEHENT 1.69a ACRES(T3.9T0 32) Y 2001.... I•AM•fylP A Mem ZONED-CpNERDAL C CI ZONED S-P-2 -••-• LUD.-RETAIL G)IMIERDK ORAvOL 11F LECHLER.ET AL. aw TE-S CHAPEL Pr6�� VOL 119.0.PO 89a SI 1-1h VOL.9929.PC.23n CEMETERY ASSOCU1TIpI D.R.T.C.T ZONED-CS SE A.aS,:.,r... ...v..>..wrsaarawy.--.•-+.2..- >,u�. r .,e .....w.•ye..1....w.xxx.ar....vc•rna.e.: t 201 -OI LI,U.D.-OFFICE COMMERCIAL LU.O.-PUBIC/SEW PUBIIC EXHIBIT MAP May-O5-00 08: 32A Michael F . Twichell , Inc_ 214 599 0583 P _ 01 ri CROSSROADS SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER 411 -1 ^ SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 0 PROJECT " 98640 CARROLL w JR. HIG A- SCHOOL PROPERTY U LINE wU z 1 a ..A.. 0 z VICINITY MAP t E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. ( FM1104 ) WHITE'S CHAPEL FRONT DOOR OF I� UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CHURCH A = DASHED LINE INDICATES DISTANCE FROM FRONT DOOR OF TOM THUMB TO PROPERTY LINE OF CLOSEST SCHOOL - 2,940 FT. = DASHED LINE INDICATES DISTANCE FROM FRONT DOOR OF TOM THUMB TO FRONT DOOR OF CHURCH - 1,294 FT, RED MAY 0 3 2000 Resolution No. 00-66 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2R1, L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDES 5299 & 5300, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 7.691 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (1) and 45.6 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: N:\COOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-66.DOC • Resolution No. 00-66 Page 2 SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption on the property being legally described as Lot 2R1, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 7.691 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-66.DOC • Resolution No. 00-66 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-66.DOC -t� -to • Resolution No. 00-66 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 2R1,L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 7.691 acres N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-66.DOC _ _ — } o CBBNL,A.. T9101O®91E DATA lae0Mi PTIONOl15 iIE DATA SEAT !i{1�n P' . qti e =�. w W150911) „_ j ii1ll iiii r d .. z ACRE , tau....,. I PROPOSED HIE TA IO A11010-DOWNED T910P®WE TAWATIC10 9 ACRES TRACT nw ICY DOA CLOTH t♦0) MOMS(LOTS 5 E0 I O WACT ONE OTT Or SOUTTILAKE r.eeRnaaowri OTT O SOUTNI.AKC Va.lp�.a.CPO.Z]5 i • ® .ree St...p fS is YMs c:.e•wcrni O va.tOR I.E., morniarn TOTRO-CS A a r.auae .. u..om� .tfl Mre� O zDNEo-CS L.U.D.-PUBLIC ARKS/OPEN v vg. "ew 0 + Lu.o.-PERM ARKS/OPEN SPACE L J ,.r..>a - "em ' 1 • ON =.. .x; = rammer,.A..e WM ...�__-...arcsIII i it 1 SS77"" :,i,a D ' ,m..., /. `► / _ems LOT x 31 MAC ; Fti.Loar .aPdaL aa. _ 7 ..• '• :: I 1 I' +�off'-.. ..ye• _-..< O: x'd.�=_— _ • , "•I' ... <.. au � ` III w(was REST PARCEL ar LOT x.BLOCK 1 0 !V ..!'' 'T� 13 MOD H1OW r ry V N, ID x APPORTIONED TO do OF SOUTL.ASE x:' a y1i// OeAL T._ . . e 1 A m t1:� �:' /�j ,.9.r � i P•(- . .......,.era......,...0• ,....... ...care•..UM WVPROJECT POET rli Z I .P,,.a�.P Dux'-- �� ^® o .� EWING �C ,1.114.4.1 ,!I . MA L.A.. WM WW1 L.9Q.L M LOT re•STOCK x]� • • _ c•r 1'i.� '� °-- �w f •�` ...z t • Lm J .® ..�• �,. • ,. .r iNORTH AMERICAN W N FIRST AYCR CN SANMcS SANS Acw. "i • P �.PP.� 1 maw.nAr vac+Iew.,PG laze _ TaRArc . ••••r�'yA...r___ ._ _ 7<--„{; +...e.'w w..o.....,.or«.,w.m........P..... W L P.R.150�. V_..a_ ..� •� ,. . . ds a...om.tleuR..._.`a.w" ..'cacao.9 WOO tAr�anea l.aavae ZONED -x -tea•. 'r .• Q c u.SOD TT u0 -RE TAIL CONu[ROAI '� ���. 'r— Daus.Tow T9100 R, 1 s 1 ,.• i / --....,..L.:, i a V'=- /'Co.4ONO ORCLE ESTATES SECOND w91ALLYENT r_.< ,�,7 mrr �� I a�I . -s' ,.}._ •�_ i i Y r/ VOL JPE is.r,1 p...R.O..aea... I ECKER 'S I• �P.PI...y(. 1 TAaa mm WatLniremlS Elm!WAN _Ana: ii..:. � - _. y Cr L.u.o.-LOIN DNS,.xLsoENnAL ❑••a••••oa AND W ...e• t I I 1. is x'• in x M .` I�: LOT. pmA..........wr.....,...e ;1, now ARLEL n.� / ❑GUN TaR TOM THUMB k 10 ��6.. C wr, CIE AOA C_ lea ooSa DOT _ ._o—d1 \ • T„i � ❑o`e•�iP_`.z:,<R" RENOVATION 1 c. se•.. f.-=.w� '..&7;,a or..... ram., .., I. ' ! ,e. s<F tar- 7�12' I I -., • *��i^4w LOT I 6 _ F'm .. x wTaTE cIIAPa Lb. • ttio �U.O.� A4 'e'er �� �4 tili°ion�iwruis O we• 1F+R Via; `_ - `� Ye•. v Lo,a OOLTT CNOP:.EC Ew,:l!' 0 O `� ,.. / zi`... ' •�' ry •} �F�-W eaLma.r.I�TP�w t-ri b _ Me•, .a r er.K..:. a.._.. .s__ �y .{'tX`S .'.,..v.,.. w..�.'....^".11..",o '".�..me• �I, . Lj.1 i "' \, ..J• V i --J i i k� �\ �ineDi:t= „• w.wDrTu e: •R° _,.�. LOT A j $ T7 :� — C N0.ItTADgnON :EREvsEIPLAN [ , NCwC,,,,re nON W w9rI0K9x xl r'rN -,�TY[ - 'fir �"� ZONCO 01...a.o. .. ..`..�..r.a.9.a.......�.. i � r , _ 47 Twi wauorowrALA ) .ere..as ,� I,;X. LOD.c-WI& oWE ars�Aa �r •—LerY F!�-' 11• ea •'p Lsa.' ' _ _.ye• �.'" es CO ,,some � H .0 i. _ rai:�.> ; P°;;d • •• �. .�T — Ira u;�:�:.. _ _ ��� A.Ovvw�s ena ur.res.aa r..r i•-'„yR L_ e.IN.�Z' w } P^ 60,00TR 1 [C.110 .� --- [T] n m.a.a » CA•S •• war ____ , �' LOT r SLOCK J �+� -.s •• •TCE BO EVARD(FM 1709) OTS t 6 10 NE O FAST AMERICAN SA.ANCS SANK Aron. cax.ERrm fo.swa(wr /^` 1 CASH ZA98-134 V CAS A 5L0C,JZS r" VARIABLE wOrN N.O.w-CONCRETE PAVEMENT .69a ZONED(]3.9]0 Sr ` �• P.P.ECO TX. ZONED-Ci °�'A°°°AO TONED s-v-Z / v'r OIAERC1AL [ Y'0 200 »r c, L.U.0 -R[TA4 GJNA[ROAI IECT.CR,1 AL. f RTOTE'S CN Pa 11 L vac I19w,Pc.a95 I " i S�—�h Q Va.9979.PG.xJ]t RNC ZONED-�ATlpl ZONED-Or/.....-0%T.CONNFPOAI L.0 D.-PINSK/Yw-PI/RUC ✓ . 0 C) Resolution No. 00-66 Page 6 EXHIBIT"C" This page is reserved for the approved City Council motion. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-66.DOC �1 12 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 16. 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Ordinance No. 781, 2nd Reading, Amending Ordinances 717 and717-B and Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code; designating the speed limit within Cambridge Place Addition as 25 mph. Action Requested: Consider amending Ordinance 717 and 717-B and Chapter 18, Article 18-79 of the Southlake City Code to designate the speed limit on all streets within the Cambridge Place Addition, specifically Brookshire Drive, Chaucer Court, Manchester Court, Montfort Court, Westminister Way, Derby Court, Chatham Court, York Court, Sussex Court, Kent Court, Rainbow Street and Ponderosa Way as 25 mph. Background Information: City staff, Department of Public Safety, and Public Works, have been working with the Homeowners Association to investigate and reduce the speeding problem in the Cambridge Place Addition. DPS has placed the "smart trailer" and conducted additional enforcement to attempt to educate the offending drivers. The City Engineer has received a petition of request from the Cambridge Place Homeowners Association for the City Council to consider reducing the speed limit in Cambridge Place Addition to 25 mph. This Ordinance was approved on first reading by City Council on June 6, 2000. Financial Considerations: The cost of the signs will be in the range of $400 to $600, depending upon the number needed. This amount of funds is available in the current budget. 7F-1 4 Citizen Input/ Board Review: City staff has been working with the Homeowners Association. Legal Review: Legal staff is reviewing the amended ordinance. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Ordinance 781 Petition Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that this request for Ordinance 781, amending Ordinance 717 and 717-B, designating the speed limit in Cambridge Place Addition, as 25 miles per hour be placed on the June 20, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for consideration. Should City Council approve the request, City Council will need to state that the speed limit has been lowered to 25 miles per hour due to the special hazard that exists. tfiLr'"04". Charlie Thomas, P.E. City Engineer 7F-2 ORDINANCE NO. 781 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 717, 717-B, AND CHAPTER 18, "TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES", OF THE SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE (1996), AS AMENDED, BY; DESIGNATING THE SPEED LIMIT WITHIN THE CAMBRIDGE PLACE ADDITION AS 25 MILES PER HOUR; DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO POST APPROPRIATE SIGNS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 545.352 (b) and 545.356, Texas Transportation Code, the City of Southlake, Texas has the authority to establish prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speeds within its corporate boundaries for vehicles on streets and highways; and WHEREAS, a special hazard exists that required a slower speed in order for an operator to drive at a speed that is reasonable and prudent under the existing circumstances in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the prima facie maximum reasonable speed limits adopted herein are not in conflict with any order of the Texas Transportation Commission declaring speed limits along any roadways within the city limits of Southlake; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED That section 18-79 of Chapter 18, "Traffic and Vehicles", of the Southlake City Code is amended to read as follows: The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed for travel on the portions of the streets or highways designated in this section shall be the speed in miles per hour (mph) designated as follows, provided that an appropriate sign giving notice thereof is erected: 7F-3 Street Speed Limit (mph) North White Chapel Boulevard from F.M. 1709 to the north end 40 of White Chapel Boulevard F.M. 1930 (Davis Boulevard) from mile point 0.000 south to 45 0.892 miles to mile point 0.892 All portions of the following streets located within the Timber 25 Lake Addition, including Lake Forest Dr., Edgemeer Lane, Edgemeer Ct., Shorecrest Dr., Parkcrest Dr., Elmbrook Ct., Shorecrest Ct., Parkdale Dr., Windmere Ct., Timber Lake Circle, Winding Creek Ct., Shadybrook Ct., Glenbrook Ct., Brookdale Ct., Woodcrest Ct., Shadow Glen Dr., Timber Lake Dr., Timber Lake Way, Ridgedale Ct., Timbercrest Ct., Brook Meadows Ct., Lakehurst Ct., Spring Brook Ct., Woodglen Ct., Parkdale Ct. All portions of the following streets located within the Southridge 25 Lakes subdivision, including San Jacinto Ct., Sabine Ct., Donley Ct., Irion Ct., Valverde Ct., Gregg Ct., Pecos Dr., Houston Ct., Liberty Ct., Concho Ct., Coreyell Ct., Stonewall Ct., Crockett Ct., Bosque Ct., Brazos Ct., Sterling Ct., Presidio Ct., Blanco Ct., Bowie Ct., Travis Ct., Brazos Dr., Loving Ct., Bandera Ct., Llano Ct., Kleberg Ct., Southridge Lakes Parkway, St. Augustine Ct. All portions of the following streets located within the Coventry 25 Manor subdivision, including Turnberry Lane, Coventry Lane, Exeter Ct., Ramsgate Ct., Devon Ct., King's Ct., Suffolk Ct., New Castle Road,Norwhich Ct., Thetford Ct. Lake Drive 25 All portions of streets located within the Cross Timber Hills 25 Addition, specifically Morgan Road, Forest Lane, Lakeview Dr., Hidden Glen Ct., Wood Creek Lane, Cross Timber Dr., Twin Creek, Woodbrook Lane, Woodbrook Ct., Holland Hill, Estalla Way, Ten Bar Trail, Ten Bar Circle, Meadow Glen, and Glen Cove, and designate all streets with Oaktree Estates, specifically Westmont Dr., Westmont Ct., Kings Brook Ct., Kings Brook Dr., Milton Dr., Lakeside Ct., Forrest Hills Ct., and Forrest Hills Dr. All portions of streets located within the Cambridge Place 25 Addition, specifically Brookshire Dr., Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct., Montfort Ct., Westminister Way, Derby Ct., Chatham Ct., York Ct., Sussex Ct., Kent Ct., Rainbow Street and Ponderosa Way 7F-4 SECTION 2. POSTING SIGNS; INVENTORY The Director of Public Works is hereby directed to ensure that appropriate signs are erected and maintained giving notice of the speed limits adopted in this ordinance and to tile an updated inventory indicating the new speed limits with the City Secretary as provided in Section 18-82 of the City Code. SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in its ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5. PENALTY Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects, or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, or any other ordinances or statutes adopting prima facie reasonable and prudent speed limits which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. 7F-5 SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 7F-6 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 7F-7 CAMBRIDGE PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION May 17, 2000 Mr. Charlie Thomas City of Southlake 1950 E. Continental Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Cambridge Place, Southlake,Texas Dear Mr. Thomas: Thank you for your assistance in guiding us through the process of lowering the speed limit in Cambridge Place. Kevin Leaverton, a Cambridge Place homeowner,has led a campaign over the past few months to obtain signatures(petition enclosed) from the majority of the property owners in support of having the speed limit lowered to 25 mph. If this motion is approved through the city,we suggest the following locations for the new speed limit signs: > Brookshire Drive-on the property line between 2808 and 2810 (currently undeveloped) > Brookshire Drive-near the play ground and lake area > Ponderosa Way - outside of the wall (west of 900 Westminster Way) marking the entrance to Cambridge Place > Rainbow Street-at each end We feel that placing the speed limit signs at these locations would provide awareness as traffic enters Cambridge Place. Additionally, if you feel more signs would he helpful in successful enforcement, we will gladly designate other areas for posting the signs. We would appreciate your assistance in taking the necessary steps to bring these issues before the city council. If you have any questions or need to contact someone about this matter,please contact Kevin Leaverton at 817-416-2494. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this matter on our behalf. • ely, M. P President MPS/ss Enclosure ** 2740 Fuller Wiser Rd. *Euless,Texas * 76039 * 817-540-3993 * Fax 817-540-5422 ** -ir t Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page 1 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr.,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct., Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way, Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct., Sussex Ct., Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the impact area is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to study process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place: Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. fklWNiii€:NAME OW s . $S ...r. .. . .C WNER ;1 'Y..,...::. ,PRROJPERTY.ADRE$S SIGNATURE Roark,Joseph Etux Carmen 2700 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2700 Brookshire Dr BMS Custom Homes, Inc 1741 Acom Ln Hurst TX 2701 Brookshire Dr t Bunce,Gerald A Etux Cheryl A 2702 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2702 Brookshire Dr Carr,Thomas E&Lori M 2304 Hunter Palce Ln Arlington TX 2703 Brookshire Dr Bridgers, C E Jr Etux Elizabeth 2704 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2704 Brookshire Dr `i do „) ,,,, r_____)_ K'nipper,Thomas Leonard 2705 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2705 Brookshire Dr /./(.4..4....--*/ Grissom, Douglas K Etux Lisa N 2706 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2706 Brookshire Dr �-r-� _s .- Terra/Cambridge Ltd, 3732 NormandyAve Dallas TX 2707 Brookshire Dr (common(common area-Home ero�� ���""" Prewit Building Corp, 2701 W Pleasant Ridge Rd Arlington TX 2708 Brookshire Dr t 1 Cassidy,William F 2709 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2709 Brookshire Dr PiMcCormack, Brian Etux Barbara 2710 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX. 2710 Brookshire Dr • , G�`�� LyC Woodward, Steve Etux Terri 2711 Brookshire Dr Southlakep�h ,lj �j TX 2711 Brookshire Dr 4,t - Nicaud, Michelle P 275 W Campbell Rd Ste301 Richardson,TX 2712 Brookshire Dr Potwora, Dennis F 2713 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2713 Brookshire Dr -171- x PQdtA ., V Patrick Gray Cus Homes Inc, 2608 N Carroll Ave Southlake TX 2715 Brookshire Dr Unumb Enterprises Inc, 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2717 Brookshire Dr . R y „1 f t ��1� Terwilliger, Kathryn Etvir R W 2719 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2719 Brookshire Dr t� X.--• Kienast,Joseph P Etux Deanna 2721 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2721 Brookshire Dr Renfro, Billy W Etux Angela M 2723 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2723 Brookshire Dr Casey,Steven Etux Cassidi L 2800 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2800 Brookshire Dr � ?a--?-2,-- ----- Lacey, Forrest D Etux Lois P 2801 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2801 Brookshire Dr Kapouralos, Mark A 2802 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2802 Brookshire Dr Benoist, Glenn H Sr Etux Tanya 2803 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2803 Brookshire Dr Goebel, L Patrick Etux Janice 2804 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2804 Brookshire Dr Howell, Kevin Etux Gayla 2805 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2805 Brookshire Dr �Q p Terra Land Development Co, 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2807 Brookshire Dr — Peracha, Mohammad Etux Rubina 2808 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2808 Brookshire Dr / Terra Land Development Co, 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 2809 Brookshire Dr Terra/Cambridge Ltd, 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 26„10 Brookshire Dr pip- r� rrstiIrn nntitinn tot n r'ih, of cnnthlakp Pirhtir \�Inrk¢ rlirPrtnr ?S F Cntlth flkP . u l;�"e (Sx,-I,' ? Cambridge Place Primary Impact Area Page 2 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit'In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr •Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct., Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct.,Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the Impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not Included In the petition to:,turfy process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place:Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. .:: 41+51ftfti.41/Ml ±f W[gf :1 SiS':.. ................................... P tOP " Mliif ES ii 410 Gerlach,Roger T Sr Etux Jeann 700 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 700 Manchester Ct �t Taylor Bradley P Etux Deane 701 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 701 Manchester Ct . �' >> i/ y.,--- Charles Kelly LLC 4036 Diamond Loch N Richland Hills,TX 702 Manchester Ct �Ervin, Richard L Etux Terri K 703 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 703 Manchester Ct 4..r�l . Jones, Nancy M 704 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 704 Manchester Ct yq Marquise Homes Inc, 2310 Michigan Ct Arlington TX 705 Manchester Ct V -1'..V-7-- Minor, Dane 706 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 706 Manchester Ct /(s • ' /� —dam- ` pGUt.•$1 \-rVt>il 707 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 707 Manchester Ct ,A ji�IIJ-e L... j Baird,Hubert Etux Tracy 709 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 709 Manchester Ct P C- J Heliing, Rick Etux Tomasa 710 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 710 Manchester Ct , t Olcha, Keith E Etux Karen E 711 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 711 Manchester Ct fr — -- 1Meador, Larry D Etux Annette L 712 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 712 Manchester Ct £ " 27. cs'f� Sanchez, Sherry 713 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 713 Manchester Ct �� 1/1/ J,S•• i ,,,,/`,'. Levitz,Gary R Etux Shelley R P 0 Box 3062 Park City, UT 714 Manchester Ct ) Dao, Huu N V Etux Kim U Nguyen 715 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 715 Manchester Ct �J % Pryor,John C Etux Anne W 716 Manchester Ct Southlake TX 716 Manchester Ct I }1 c:1)12�2.- Palmer, Lee J 000717 Manchester Ct Southlake IX 717 Manchester Ct Hoss, Gregg M Sr Etux Tory L 2700 Montfort Ct Southlake TX 2700 Montfort Ct Neal, Kerry D Etux Georgia L 2701 Montfort Ct Southlake TX 2701 Montfort Ct Vintage Custom Homes,Attn Michael Ga PO Box 54543 Hurst TX 2702 Montfort Ct - /'' Dolezal.Tony A Etux Suzanne R 2704 Montfort Ct Southlake TX 2704 Montfort Ct , . + .: r' ) o f cc tL�� . 7Ua.h'1 orrt or4 : r ‘ �70,A n1o, ,r� , "�- -�, (A--) o', Please return petition to tfie City of Southlake, Public Works Director, 1725 E. Southlake Blvd, Southlake , Texas 7609? Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page : 3 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit in Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct.,Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household, business,school,etc.within the Impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to:.turfy process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own, Cambridge Place: Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. OWNER NAME tWf RAgl $i3 ;! t?WN t lT1iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii .. . : ATEURE Johnson, Kevin L Etux Kerry L 700 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 700 Chaucer Ct Jolley, Monte G 701 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 701 Chaucer Ct gi'll Jameson, Mark J Etux Nicole M 702 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 702 Chaucer Ct /\) v.Qzo Rader, Richard G Jr Etux Kath- 703 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 703 Chaucer Ct Zagar, Keith C Etux Amy S 704 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 704 Chaucer Ct 0yk,4� ' U -.__f Eberhardt,Jeffrey Etux Diane 1714 Altacrest Dr Grapevine TX 705 Chaucer Ct Kleinhammer, Rodney Etux Jeann 706 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 706 Chaucer Ct Xie: ( Cadiz,Hesse L 707 Chaucer Ct Southlake TX 707 Chaucer Ct ' 'Stratford Homes Inc, 900 Squaw Creek Rd Weatherford TX 708 Chaucer Ct £aciftO(Q, y 1r 1ii- ' e eioLIc.4.t 0f- Stx.t4.lakc Tx '700 CAac.c.,,-C `,de/w�eec-__ Z�_ (7 i ,i.. ..r r.-..iLI,Irn ri"hrr, 1r•In-1,. r11r..rhnr ,-"r r- '- OI,I-.,., nI%,-I r,,,.e Li ,I Tn., rn,) � Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page 9 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr.,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct.,Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the Impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to study process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place:Primary Impact Area -The primary Impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. <::>::::.:.;. TYADD RE S .: .... .::.. .: .. ...$IGNATt1RE WNC1t :NAM , °iS : QWNtJ ;> >» ::: :<`PFttpt ... Divis,Gregory&E Schweitzer 2700 Derby Ct .. Southlake TX 2700 Derby Ct - �„-, Trader, Michael 2701 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2701 Derby Ct Rost,Timothy Etux Holly F 2702 Derby Ct . Southlake TX 2702 Derby Ct st 1_ — Y . Adair, Ronald T Etux Terri J 109 Blackfoot Trl Lake Kiowa TX 2703 Derby Ct �'�1 - \JN. . ' _, ' _—0—'1/4,—. Grossman,Wm S Etux Anna M 2704 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2704 Derby Ct ( 1 ,,.,, Rhodes,David P Etux Susan K 2705 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2705 Derby Ct . v 4 I1 Powell,John E Etux Susan M 2707 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2706 Derby Ct OP v'4{ly0707 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2707 Derby Ct 'lid!:.1 Friedman, Harold L Etux Laura 2708 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2708 Derby Ct V �.1 Crow,Neale Kay 2709 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2709 Derby Ct f � • Parrish, R David Etux Karen M 2710 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2710 Derby Ct lir. r 'i 4� Unumb Enterprises Inc, 2711 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2711 Derby Ct 407 ' ''! Coffee,Todd A Etux Mary A 2712 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2712 Derby Ct - T I • f f . f Unumb Enterprises Inc, 2709 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2713 Derby Ct (not ii ted in reco.$)., Howard Homes Inc, 3204 Long Prairie Rd Flower Mound TX 2714 Derby Ct Christy,Samuel Etux Hilda S 2715 Derby Ct Southlake TX 2715 Derby Ct i Please return netitirtn to tli'e City of Southlake, Public Works Director, 1725 E. Southlake Blvd, Southlake , Texas 76092 Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page `_ 3 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way, Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct., Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the Impact area is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not Included In the petition to study process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place: Primary Impact Area -The primary Impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote E 41!101.tli.l►tlE# S$ JNER CITY-.,. :::PRC1N t'F' 1IPORg85 SIGNATURE Leaverton, Kevin 0 Etux Gwen M 800 Westminster Way Southlake TX 800 Westminster Way Hubbs, Russell C Etux Alison L 802 Westminster Way Southlake TX 802 Westminster Way T t ,v Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 804 Westminster Way Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 900 Westminster Way Clonts, Richard A Etux Susan R 000901 Westminster Way Southlake TX 901 Westminster Way .7:7 —4 (p, Talisman Homes Inc 1609 Oak Knoll Dr Colleyville TX 902 Westminster Way Hatfield Custom Homes 2666 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 903 Westminster Way (` ` ,Z { � Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 904 Westminster Way }� �� `�`� BMS Custom Homes 1741 Acorn Ln Hurst TX 905 Westminster Way i J Lambert Construction Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 906 Westminster Way t Crescent Construction Inc PO Box 37 Grapevine TX 907 Westminster Way1-4 6 Ambiance Custom Homes Inc 6312 Regiment PI Colleyville TX 908 Westminster Way Berry Construction Inc PO Box 821693 N Richland Hills TX 909 Westminster Way Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 910 Westminster Way Talisman Homes Inc 1609 Oak Knoll Dr Colleyville TX 911 Westminster Way Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 912 Westminster Way Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 913 Westminster Way doll . Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 914 Westminster Way ',��' i ;�__ Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 915 Westminster Way __ • PIFacr+ rptiirn Hot itinn to trip rihr of Cot lthl.kP Piihli\t nrkC flirortnr 17,q 1 gnn11'hI?kn Blvd cnifthlikn TPK;,' 7F,flO , Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page ( ) Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr., Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct.,Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct.,Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment Initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the Impact area is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to study process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place:Primary Impact Area -The primary Impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner Is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote 0.1"40. 41.4" ....................................................... .. :.... is J 4 ,; .... ftV+1AI Jiii'... .. 40. tTY At3gl..i> fi1GNATU Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 700 Chatham Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 701 Chatham Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 702 Chatham Ct J.A. Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 703 Chatham Ct J A Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 704 Chatham Ct Hess,Terry R Etux Sharon K 601 Quorum Dr Trophy Club TX 705 Chatham Ct Kellum, Danny Etux Debbie 706 Chatham Ct Southlake TX 706 Chatham Ctyit'-� Littner,Michael J Etux Ulla 707 Chatham Ct Southlake TX 707 Chatham Ct i Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 708 Chatham Ct 1 )2a2.Mf-7 ' 4'(/t4"- K& H Homes 3204 Long Prairie Rd Flower Mound TX 709 Chatham Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 710 Chatham Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 712 Chatham Ct Akyaw-Owusu,Samuel Etux Maria 714 Chatham Ct Southlake TX 714 Chatham Ct a. —/L14 cr Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2701 York Ct 1i • ji Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2703 York Ct �� J A Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 2705 York Ct J A Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 2707 York Ct Neely,Jeffrey A Etux Colleen 4549 N O'Connor#1260 Irving TX 2709 York Ct Randy Bollig Builder Inc PO Box 93055 Southlake TX 2710 York Ct I Roesenberg,Norman Etux Debbie 2711 York Ct Southlake TX 2711 York Ct '�,,,,A ( - r/C Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2712 York Ct _ Charles Kelly LLC 4036 Diamond Loch N Richland Hills,TX 2713 York Ct J A Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 2714 York Ct Darovec,James L Etux Tara K 2715 York Ct Southlake TX 2715 York Ct 11-`.1 f ,t11 <\. J A Hatfield Inc 2665 Juniper Ln Grapevine TX 2716 York Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2717 York Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2718 York Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 2719 York Ct - ter/ Pip rpf,Irn not-if-inn try f�,p r�ihr of Cn,Ifhlalro PI,hlir 1n/n�-Irr rlimrtnr 17-)5 r' Cniithlatrp RIvri Cnitt-hihp Tpvn'' 7rncr, /' /' Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page ) Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit in Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr.,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct., Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment Initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the Impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not Included in the petition to study process.In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place:Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 700 Kent Ct Comwell, Robert W Etux Karen 2702 Valleywood Drive Grapevine TX 701 Kent Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 702 Kent Ct 1 a� i 2 Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 703 Kent Ct ,i> Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 704 Kent Ct ' Wye Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 705 Kent Ct f j/_Appih-��r 0 e. , Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 706 Kent Ct , f % ' Harrell Custom Homes, Inc 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 707 Kent Ct 44119 lini'_ , 17 -J Lambert Construction Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 708 Kent Ct I r 7 Harrell Custom Homes, Inc 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 709 Kent Ct , Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 710 Kent Ct / Harrell Custom Homes, Inc 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 711 Kent Ct �/V . r Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd . Fort Worth TX 712 Kent Ct Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 713 Kent Ct t fi"Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 714 Kent Ct , Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 715 Kent Ct f #//'- Piplc rpthIrv, nntltinn to the rite of cnnthI1Ier. Pi 011ie- U/nrkc rlirortnr. 172c F Snttthlnke Rlvri cnmithl;ike Texa', 7rfkl-' Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page 9 Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr.,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way, Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct.,Sussex Ct.,Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to study process. In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place:Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner Is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. . iiii .:fiWNEft VAM> . t7Wi R:ADD .;:.fiWDJJ t:OIre �tCp 'F''�:Il�iS::::�:�� u>:: .�IGNA'ft1 E, Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 700 Sussex Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 701 Sussex Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 702 Sussex Ct Grays,Peter Etux Aline 2336 Leafy Glen Ct Bedford TX 703 Sussex Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 704 Sussex Ct Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 705 Sussex Ct Randy Bollig Builder Inc PO Box 93055 Southlake TX 706 Sussex Ct Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 707 Sussex Ct f 1 Randy Bollig Builder Inc PO Box 93055 Southlake TX 708 Sussex Ct , Harrell Custom Homes, Inc 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 709 Sussex Ct �— Crescent Construction Inc PO Box 37 Grapevine TX 710 Sussex Ct r-, Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 711 Sussex Ct Randy Bollig Builder Inc PO Box 93055 Southlake TX 712 Sussex Ct Harrell Custom Homes, Inc 2807 Brookshire Dr Southlake TX 713 Sussex Ct Lambert's Ornamental Iron Inc 4116 McLean Rd Fort Worth TX 714 Sussex Ct Terra/Cambridge Ltd 3732 Normandy Ave Dallas TX 715 Sussex Ct • Please return netition to fhe City of Southlake, Public Works Director, 1725 F. Southlake Blvd, Southlake • Texas 7609? Cambridge Place - Primary Impact Area Page Petition for Speed Zone Change to Twenty-five MPH We,the undersigned,hereby petition to request the City of Southlake to set the posted speed limit In Cambridge Place at twenty five(25)miles per hour on the streets of Brookshire Dr.,Chaucer Ct., Manchester Ct.,Montfort Ct.,Westminster Way,Derby Ct.,Chatham Ct.,York ct.,Sussex Ct., Kent Ct., Rainbow St.,and Ponderosa Way according to the Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic managment Initiatives. Each household,business,school,etc.within the impact area Is entitled to one signature on the petition per address. Non-property owning residents are not included in the petition to study process.In the case of one property owner with multiple properties within specifically affected area,that property owner will be provided 1 vote for each parcel they own. Cambridge Place: Primary Impact Area -The primary impact area is defined as those residents along the proposed streets. By placing a signature below,the property owner is placing a positive vote for the lowering of the neighborhood speed limit as described by the language above. A blank space indicates a"NO"vote. .: .......... .. . .:: S NAT4! Waltman,C P Etux A G 1401 Rainbow St Southlake TX 1401 Rainbow St Odette, Edwin Etux Angela 1403 Rainbow St Southlake TX 1403 Rainbow St Newman,David Etux Marilyn 1501 Rainbow St Southlake TX 1501 Rainbow St Bartley, Robert D Etux Faye L 1503 Rainbow St Southlake TX 1503 Rainbow St Wetteland,John K Etux Michele 100 Harvard Dr Southlake TX 1713 Rainbow St J TI 1 J I Please return petition to f e City of Southlake, Public Works Director, 1725 E. Southlake Blvd, Southlake , Texas 7609? City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 15, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Lauren Safranek, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance Authorizing and Allowing a Buy Back Option for Specific Employees with TMRS Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 782 authorizing and allowing a buy back option for specific employees with TMRS. Background Information: TMRS permits participating cities to pass an ordinance allowing its qualified employees to "buy-back" previously forfeited TMRS service credit. This is possible even if the employee's service credit was previously terminated and the employee withdrew member deposits. Forfeited service can be bought back from the City of Southlake, or another participating TMRS city. To "buy-back" previously forfeited service credit and member deposits, the employee must: • Be an employee of the city and a member of TMRS on the date of the "buy-back" ordinance's adoption; and, • Must have at least 24 consecutive months of service credit as an employee of the city adopting the ordinance; and • Re-deposit, in a lump sum, all of the amount previously withdrawn plus the reinstatement fee equal to 5% per year of the amount withdrawn. Because employees must have at least 24 consecutive months of service with the City of Southlake when the ordinance is passed, all employees that may have with drawn previous funds from TMRS may not be eligible to buy back. For this reason, it is best if the City can pass a buy back ordinance every 3-4 years so that effected employees have the option to buy back forfeited funds. The last buy back ordinance was passed in September 1993. The buy back ordinance does effect the City's TMRS contribution rate because the City must now provide the funds necessary to match the employee's contributions at a 2:1 ratio upon the employee's retirement. However, the City's contribution rate will only be affected if an employee actually "buys-back" their forfeited service credit. TMRS conducts a study, upon our request, to determine which of our employees are eligible for buy-back once an ordinance is adopted. 7G-1 Billy Campbell, City Manager Second Reading of Ordinance No. 782 June 15, 2000 ge 2 Currently, there are 22 employees that would be eligible for buy-back if this ordinance were adopted. If all employees chose to buy back their forfeited service credit, the City's contribution rate would increase by .37%. However, TMRS only adjusts our contribution rate if an employee buys back forfeited service credit, and even then, it would be a pro-rated percent of .37%. When the last buy back ordinance was passed, 15 employees were eligible for buy back. Since that time, only 3 employee have bought back forfeited service credit. Financial Considerations: For the remainder of FY 99-00 and for all of FY 00-01 there will be no financial impact even if an eligible employee buys-back their forfeited service credit. If an eligible employee takes advantage of the buy back option, the earliest the City's contribution rate would be affected would be for FY 01-02. TMRS only adjusts our contribution rate if an employee buys back forfeited service credit, and even then, it would be a pro-rated percent of.37%. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not applicable Legal Review: The Ordinance has been reviewed and approved by the attorneys. Alternatives: Not applicable Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. 782 Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 782 by the City Council 7G-2 TMRS-H ORDINANCE NO. 782 TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY WHO HAVE TERMINATED PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIPS IN TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, TO DEPOSIT THE SUMS SO WITHDRAWN, PLUS ANNUAL WITHDRAWAL CHARGES, AND ALLOWING AND UNDERTAKING THE COST OF ALLOWING ANY SUCH EMPLOYEE CREDIT IN SUCH SYSTEM FOR ALL SERVICE TO WHICH SUCH EMPLOYEE HAD BEEN ENTITLED AT DATE OF SUCH WITHDRAWAL, WITH LIKE EFFECT AS IF ALL SUCH SERVICE HAD BEEN PERFORMED AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS CITY. WHEREAS, the actuary of the Texas Municipal Retirement System has determined that all obligations charged against the City's account in the municipality accumulation fund, including the obligations arising as a result of this ordinance, can be funded by the City within its maximum contribution rate and within its amortization period; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this ordinance is in the best interests of the City; now therefore WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, finds that it will be in the public interest for the City to have its employees participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System as hereinafter provided; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 853.004 of Subtitle G of Title 8, V.T.C.A., Government Code, as amended, the City of Southlake hereby elects to allow any member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System who is an employee of this City on the 20th day of June, 2000, who has terminated a previous membership in said System by withdrawal of deposits while absent from service, but who has at least 24 months of credited service as an employee of this City since resuming membership to deposit with the System in a lump sum the amount withdrawn, plus a withdrawal charge of five percent (5%) of such amount for each year from date of such withdrawal to date of redeposit, and thereupon such member shall be allowed credit for all service had been rendered as an employee of this City, whether so rendered or not. The City agrees to underwrite and hereby assumes the obligations arising out of the granting of all such credits, and agrees that all such obligations and 7G-3 Ordinance No. 782 Page 2 reserves required to provide such credits shall be charged to this City's account in the municipality accumulation fund. The five percent (5%) per annum withdrawal charge paid by the member shall be deposited to the credit of the City's account in said municipality accumulation fund; and the deposits of the amount previously withdrawn by the member shall be credited to his or her individual account in the employees' savings fund of the System. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective on the day of , 2000, which is a date on or after the date set forth in Section 1, above. Passed and approved this the day of , 2000. Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 7G-4 ---�0. City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-047 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-343 - First Reading - Rezoning and Site Plan - Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Site Plan on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres. PURPOSE: Appropriate zoning and Site Plan approval are required prior to issuance of a building permit. LOCATION: On the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 400' east of Randol Mill. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. , LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) to property owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) to property owners outside the 200' notification area. RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from outside the 200' notification area: • Charles W. Free, 550 N. Randol Mill Avenue, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received June 7, 2000) • James R. Hoglund, 108 Killdeer Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "Property surrounded by the City's facility is well buffered by DPS structure and landscaping plans" (Received June 8, 2000) P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000, and to delete Items#l.a(500' driveway spacing on F.M. 1709) and #1.b (250' driveway spacing on Randol Mill Avenue). 7A-1 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-047ZS.doc Tract Map ZAOO-047 _ ■ rwnC v�Z - Ali�b 1� i l r �MI 01111111 I PI,��.� — _fin —,ma AN.,� AAThaliAw.ft itaiNA- 4�6►� —=� m HII I PIDF •N ��� NOP 011° 4 Mj i`mg ��\//����r�`� =DM 111111111116•0 NI Is-.1-4=DV 11117- 1,4 , .. N■:fI■ 'I `it4& •� lo.�F• ''tea ■ 1� - I ::. ii rim '� ;.mod at Iii MAW 1 .tritiviatit m MR Oil ME ,_ ,_ 614 ►c ... •■vim : . •Ii ! i ..•;;. iitisoollp im " "i•="1"N, 4t44a i r ,"LSI ilia . ***'L..'laDala:::trig t( ls ' s si ...�� 1■OMMMP/.MEIN � ..&' ■ffi►iti.at ill" I "OM illitall I I=I 111 I I raTib :;17_,IllirT71611 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ / W / 7 E S Surrounding Property Owners . ZA00-047 me . .� 4, Williv 11111 P 'fp -- gribliX 15 111 A.#► r aw 14 lir 4 1$614 orrillip i z " Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. H.Saunders 1. "AG" 1. Retail Commercial 1. 1.00 acres 2. Myers Meadow Homeowners Assn. 2. "R-PUD" 2. Medium Density Residential 2. 4.18 acres 3. Schlotzsky's Real Estate Inc. 3. "C-2" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.83 acres 4. Ludwig Partners,Ltd. 4. "C-3" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 1.02 acres 5. Venus Partners IV,LP 5. "C-3" 5. Retail commercial 5. 2.44 acres 6. Southlake JV 6. "C-3" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 0.86 acres 7. Southlake JV 7. "C-3" 7. Retail Commercial 7. 9.20 acres 8. McDonald's Corp. 8. "C-3" 8. Retail Commercial 8. 1.06 acres 9. City of Southlake 9. "C-3"P'AG" 9. Retail Commercial 9. 0.82 acres 10.M&H Food Mart 10."C-2" 10.Retail Commercial 10. 1.02 acres 11. Shunail Corp Inc. 11."C-3" 11. Retail Commercial 11. 1.08 acres 12.J.Martin 12."C-3" 12. Retail Commercial 12.3.21 acres 13.D. Brown 13."SF-1A" 13.Office Commercial 13.3.25 acres 14.D.Collins 14. "SF-1A" 14.Low Density Residential 14.3.19 acres 15.D.Campbell 15."SF-1A" 15. Low Density Residential 15.3.29 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-047.doc • `o s 1 1 B ro .f - 5 A,1c IN0. 13V. '''''-':''P'' E. G[Rt I11. -r'" 1;+5oSTBvc ZONINGF 1 a: ..5.1 I .PROPOSED 'Y. 11.. -••mv•.o EXISTING IAND_USE—__ '•'E' = L —_--- -_�-c I I `C • SPTE - -. 1.�6t02.M,4LSIGJM c a ,o r¢ 1 NE r r.w:.o...n..•r .i Fi • SIB F.g_YA S 1"g, v '4" -�1CC s f r _T wr T _ .. o ,�� Es /; f �' . i �O ' NCMITI 1 '__1_ I -.-�.—. ?tiv Wr8 E T + B cra. / \\ i _•�•+Ia` I `� ,\ T.1� I sotrTE� z 1a N L10 n o • . . s Zr.,,,,, '..,.eo nwE '''...��o�,w.,N oa.r. .r I. _TeDInBi 'j ICI I ~ �,,�4' I 0&1�1 .....'I. .i a, - '_ ..,~:V .- -- - PROSIDEO ./ 7wE . ,c. _1 / ; 3 1 i Lg �r- �` -.� ,�4'p� LANDSCAPE LEGEND, pq`• Par STACKING MSC _ I 6 3 t. \`':`�l / Q���O j I\. �a M'.ERS NEADON PHASE TWO CANOPY irmlLEE�nlo.�OAK. i or LIVE 1 I 1 ',N CABINET A.SIIC•E-.MO RRTCr I TOT. RDBERT G.BROWN I UNDER HSI.UR TREE PCWAPEU1.04�M YAUPUN HOLLS3) •3'/� O ZOnED CUD•NO Nato,l rOL 39,.P•i.G.DR.r C.T. _ >` l D ED M['E-_IT'.NESCENDA. V I I.V Cr."nEA ED USE 0/r / 'I I - I I I I I_�.•) I IL ' •uuaaa a ul�r xu•wI ruw waxwn. ww �, _ I I �I g �1 = n.'�� E SHRUBS UFD TR RgTIN TAN HINIPER.BURFORD HOLM VI� I - )E. 1 :I 1 I 1 1 r r i'1 i I r,+� f.1 R— :t �-// �,W`•.»'i,Aar,.e I..n>a.... ' - 1 1 MN' PR1v..1E.:.PEfr. •. , "''ORAL 'AB� BANK oam I ANC.JP.AIhIAGE E--AE.:L'I-._ - SQ.FT. I 3.800 SQ.FT. 3 1 Qy�1 •0.,dsr <.�. -. BurslnYARD - _ - T�{ RESTAURANT ' Yi `vy , J I '1 I. ,,,,YARD /� Id10 q C 5.000 SQ.FT. I�' L e971•lU -rr1�el.uu i fi a IF'-ll 3� : 8 kt ti (� 91. SCFILOT/SKYS-••.t •-\ liii. ) uI)i11n•lhi. u(�Es. zi. fl l ) I :,� • 11..c �I i( J.00% FT. Ih�;. :� :L�`�� I I I I 18i i I I I I I; 1 6:'.fir 8 I ! -• I>wi • 1rl •• 4t -/ -- _ _ _69956 J�EIL_ m'BUBDINCN LINE - 110A0 549 FT1 OT 2 :L- 1 x •..-=_' :j i _ 99 PARKING SPACES j 49 PARKWG SPACES .�lT - u— - �.E - -- - -- - '— . .•E Da • 1 1 11 II I I eA' B•1 :N L16.000 SQ FT.) POINT OF E s nce ARKPKi 13 I I 11 15: 11 I I 191 I I 36 P SPACES ._ BEGINNING, R -..,_. 1 l l 1 Ai_ I I 1 ' ; /lla...0,1 _;EL , h, y`.r .. r.l 1 1- -.� I y i I I 1 1� u EC ..LEIS.T1 c,•.cl..l '_DRABJAGE'Er�SEM•.NT .,.r'fft« 10�1h'f•I.AAS`k21 A' •- �.7 -r-I" <; '-`".. -' .... .. --- .w uni.EASEMENT -GAO - I 4 i 1 1 S A D I740'W-81LS E „c FEU i ) i .o-90'X 54'COMMON ACCESS FSMT. p EIr�L Nr.••PEE' ous.-050 .m L.... .2�.r EER 2.4 d 1_ - CENTERLINE OF FM.1709 - - - - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - • 6 SOUTHLAKE BLVD. F.M. 1709 LOT a,BLJCR• I LOT 5,BLO'JN r i I I I SOVTNLAef CRy SSe,G SDUTNLAI.E CROSSING 1 I IS UTBr9 EA$�ENF I r �(���E� • iNaSE. I 1 _-,:•a-i:A �SL+-PE_.L__+. •18.6 u1E i:S_P.BL4P -,.__.-__ ___.....___ LUC 5'.E-sDu0E L u 0 L2:EOUSE - r - 1 -A SEP 251 95 I LOT o.BLOCK I •` EL'C,.1 "r y F •. I T ,] ji 1+ (_---,—J SOUT.B VMFCROSSING Re SSNG (r__ SOUD91,,,AkR^5SS9aG I 5 U.LL p,E dU '+.�J6.J4 U Li CAB.•,SLGE 2425 RR.TX;T :'.AB 4 3110E.ii!PA.TC.T. _ A.SLIDE 2.1.1..1 CI.r._f. • ACCESS ESSiT Offµ'r.]- i•.,ED'C•)' �J L.U.D.MIXED USE LU..,MIXED USE 1 R L.46..41.6E.UoE �• \ ACCESS ESMT. (�=fj , CE0ICAU:N a �A0E f TE.ARNA: }UNTV JE 2AN9 V/.cP.EA..REP I_Ua TONNI PANTHERS LP ..:Irp P ,,u.in 7HE14.2E.:win SI Tepee..II.nu a.)se....5 w e Sau•na.ly DATE OF PREPARATION SEPPEMBER 4 1995 N.I CREW. PRESIDENT 22 0NEWS PEAL!•.0.15E :,EnEr.L PARTNB:RS 1n of n Tract any s •Y29 F.yn11n1 ar DEVFIOPM NC BYE DRY(SUTTON)PARTNERS R LD. y39..1s DREWS LTY GROUP GENERAL PARTNERS <LP Eaarrns 7 aaer.r. .50-C; • Tarr 01 ." S Inc'IornPIA SouH corner or sRU)nrnn 5uNo 'M 4� nl',c.o., ' .:. •'e.:. .•a= Roan CONCEPT PLAN FOR IOIPI DR PRESIDENT _• N )AV - -T •. irN lr E 35 n s wry.n We.mnr SOUTH LAKE RETAIL CENTER, �'A MILL ROAD,SUITE W ..Tr i r art ^W.I.5n. s41T ONLY TEX/S 1S230 .C.:AYW..:Aa,A )a.•...n Vt...y I:r.,. .•P. N.v1n•.1- .•, ,r•.r .1..R.rP.0 WO .ra.n•eP .m. Er: I.v mn No,1Aw•.1+r.orro or LOTS I.T.1 W.R.EAVES NO.SDD ADOPTION, SOUTHUKE TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS IT49 E,... r1B:I1..E. 12 er. :Ed.-. a Iran r COLLINS/REINSENBICHLER ARCHITECTS ' - BEING AIR ACRE IN TEIE WO.EAVES N Vew.rt• i T•Ac• R9AD N.CENTRAL EXPWV A ,1 L•.•,.,r.^S i r 135 r raa SURVEY PABS+fAACT NO.AIO PREMIER RACE SUITE IBO �s o ny.• ... ,• .. . .nr ,•) ..1n eI),.nr. 2GLE PHONE: TEXAS 75336 (0I .. .r... • •r P— v PHONE: IJ-501 a—_=�.._..._-_�_— ..--.----_—____� NORM FAX'3J11W-5001 ('Arc N(l 7A QS-RS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-047 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 06/02/00 Project Name: Site Plan— Southlake Depertment of Public Safety—West Facility APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Phillips Swager Associates 667 North Carroll Avenue 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 670 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: 817-481-5581 X730 Phone: 214-692-6115 Fax: 817-481-0036 Attn: Garland Wilson Fax: 214-692-6118 Attn: John Main CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General De%c!n�ment Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Ai':'illation Y Complies Masonry Stm. ~cis Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Laii,:,cape Y Complies Driveways Y See Comments No. 1 Lighting Y Shall Comply 1. Driv'cways do not comply with the Driveway Ordinance as follows: a. 500' of spacing is required between commercial driveway centerlines along Southlake Boulevard. The proposed commercial/public access driveway is approximately 320' from an existing commercial driveway to the west and approximately 348'from an existing commercial driveway to the east. (Variance Requested) * The driveway located on the east portion of the site has not been evaluated for spacing due to the proposed function of this driveway. This drive is for emergency vehicle access only. * Please note that the proposed driveway intersecting Southlake Blvd. is in compliance with the 500' spacing required from street intersections. This driveway is 530' from the intersection of Randol Mill Ave City of Southlake, Texas b. 250' spacing is required between commercial/public access driveway centerlines along Randol Mill Avenue. The proposed south commercial/public access driveway intersecting • Randol Mill Ave. is approximately 220' from an existing commercial driveway to the south. This driveway is also approximately 150' from the proposed north personnel access driveway. (Variance Requested) * All proposed driveways comply with stacking depth requirements. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILE S\REV\#SPLAN-1.\VPD • D n- + City of Southlake, Texas Case No. 00-047 Review No. One Dated: 5 — 30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 2, Block 1 (Site Plan Southlake DPS West Facility) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 5 - 22 - 00. Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: * Because landscaping is subject to Site Pan approval, a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the proposed Site Plan. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan is required to be submitted with the Construction Plans when the applicant submits them for review by the Building Department to receive a Building Permit. * In the Bufferyard Summary Chart, please correct the length of the North bufferyard to reflect the entire length of the property boundary line. (564'). Please correspond the required plant material with the correction. * All interior landscape calculations are correct as shown for the current phase of development. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: * Although a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the Site Plan it will be reviewed at this time as though it is a part of the Site Plan approval. * Please correspond the Interior and Bufferyard Summary Charts with the submitted Site Plan Summary Charts. * The applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits for a majority of trees with in the bufferyard landscape areas of the site. Credits shall only be granted if the Tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined by the Landscape Administrator at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. Only existing trees which are within fifty feet (50') of the property line and have a minimum fifty percent (50%) of the drip line within a landscape area shall be granted credits toward reducing the required plantings. * The applicant is proposing to take a 20% reduction of required plant material for doubling the width of the North bufferyard, South bufferyard along Hwy. 1709, East bufferyard and West bufferyard. This reduction of required amounts of plant material is allowable as it corresponds to Illustration "A" of Section 42 Bufferyards of the Zoning Ordinance. BUILDING INSPECTIONS ' 1 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-047 Date of Review: 5 — 30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 3, Block 1 (Site Plan— Southlake DPS West Facility) OWNER: PREPARED BY: City of Southlake Raymond L. Goodson. Jr. Inc. 667 N. Carroll Ave. 5445 La Sierra, Suite 300 L.B. 17 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231-4138 Phone: (817) 481-5581 Phone: (817) 739-8100 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant submitted a good Tree Survey that meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. The southern access drive from Randol Mill Ave. shows to remove eighteen (18) existing trees. Out of the total 18 trees, six (6) are dead and four (4) are protected species according to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; and eight (8) are marginal or not protected. Only one (1) of the marginal trees, a Green Ash, is considerable of preserving. The others are declining or in a hazardous state. 3. To better preserve the trees within the area of the North bufferyard, the proposed retention wall could be moved to the North side of the trees where it would not be necessary to make any grade changes between the retention wall and the North parking spaces and access drive. The wall should be constructed on the far North side of the bufferyard. 4. Out of the total 125 existing trees on the site, 40 would need to be removed for the proposed construction; leaving 85 remaining on the site. I noticed only two trees on the site that could possibly be transplanted and moved to another site. They were a 6" Cedar Elm and a 4" Pecan. The Cedar Elm is designated by the #78 on the Landscape Plan and the Pecan is not identified on the plans. 5. Although Lot 2R, Block 1 is not a part of the proposed plan, the design of the site removes the best trees on the site. Of course the trees in the middle of the lot could not be saved because they BUILDING INSPECTIONS City of Southiake, Texas would be in the middle of a building. But, if the parking lot area was redesigned and grade changes kept minimal more of the specimen trees could be preserved. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this site. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Informational comments = * Observational comments = # BUILDING INSPECTIONS • • ; 1 ; 1 l I O r%rvAR SPADE /,,O'aq rtr / I ND N S EAXW PHASEa vvre+ I"•'". s.m!"s --ryi."r+'�w d SCHL R£r DELI /� n ` 1 i .`W9 R A CAWS 1� A NAR�OtQ s' °°s / n22.2 No ...... „ - .! ..°4 R• Na t%4Am�Hov 1 �I ; tua nxa.a ..T Ndl \ �f✓ M1 3,37.3Rau ; SI I t I up'" ,,,,,, /rd„M° �`°"" • y� .s• \{\ On�l ( �� M w _I_ r IS w.'N, ` 6A60' E Ime girl] rw " -- \ $•••• 'i`''''` ,� k `— .•'a 4 tj 1 s t a �+- �,eP �- �Y: ,;o.sn.r - ,A °..`.�� •. di 4 - _ �R DRAKE ADEPT hi • lt' ��---- `` •a A a1` l / `IIP [Y T /Ksp d /• \ '��f N LEGEND 1 1 NYOu.3� SERER LAVE ��A 4 % PROPSERER Lp( LOT 4 BLOCK II y ;..1r t 1 1 4',K a.t as.lr.i /O' ,rf 15, POOP xu/CN<wC I I ' III II NO !UI i• 1, II s o _,' " PROPOSED s/s 40/:s,9a'd'r: W DEDLNAAND RONS rarnraes I11 -tRri` IRA/N/hG11s $t sdt` x • o' T-57CMYB!/RD1N0 �\ ".°' d�V' �sf '� 1 asrO-- a FA lC NL '� I ;MY.SF. / ` d r ,, 1"/�, //i i I �1� II r arrYyhr. ,rS.''� 5 .+ `�s/�/I♦ ua r..°ks`.:'Y. �.r <,,V r r ee.s r ` '{"L3�!''"-„` rx eANr L 13 \, ,� -yr 1 A, "'.+{tlr1 ' j tr i PHASE a .__ I f1 I •.� �.I�pR • -°'�:e�f>/fig 1•� LL g /40 / �Y nw. "ra...o../ - I 41 ill ,.L ,. ,'`, . o II(\7 l'','''';,,,'✓- •y11 , i 61 ,y,�ir/f'�`/ ` .� I. NO pTTS[1C SRWACY 6 BEING HAMCP I _ 4. , 7pr`° -<% it , ,�.444..44.1.1c z .0 ux ve sxA<eaw r r N ua a<nYo nef w ssr 1 sl I ,9. • • E T.2IL OEA�'%1 ✓ SITE DATA SUMMARY �M'f AMY/IgV , 1 I .. {� ` \ \N'� ` v /''. / / ' \ LOT OR tor j ^` I 'V.." / \ SNEOIcctiA IHLY CCNCY'PT PAN SITE PLAN n Za.wn.T C I i / \\ �� ,y .ac /'' ENs•ic raves c-zo Ac 1,22LAc PAIL,/-,• ! I Ill ¢y; �;`� �i \ PRp.OSLO rGNMo' C-2 P-I R/LS OSES UWIEO LO Y I III . , ;a O4/( R / -1 Q / "ARK WWI MCA, q I d f rl / °ji V ) [� snvrii.T RE C p LNG <MO OW axwrtw. prnL MOMS REUL merlma PHASE a >r TEXACD CIS STATKlN . ' , K V o 5 o rn ww r . a ax0r1 v n/I.Sr'' 1 � <Q791[R AfNX/MY /n `• /�/J 4 0 f,j'., Iua n m•.+c./ `r,,LIPEAGE. Ilea srI li 1T6ar1 gA Pa EAR 14 Al P // RR GONRAEE' AN TI-SJ Y/ti to. yO 'Ir.M.39 Sr/N.JRO II ri t S Iii,'. / .:.rN S (/Lr AREA o wmv'R.N. �y at SW Sr/ur wnr Hr.eazw s/SW f « _LOIN rKYP.P., prc IZMJ Sr maim.`aaq.9, k j 'jam'//} PLUS/SkP11Lrr ITE/!;v' ,{ 1 /,j�Ir/y�4t /y'`'?% / (NO Oar ECSY E4[AN<AIGI.v- OT w.1 r 1 Y ,4• /r /� too..BLOCK NIy RCOT MTA: O IISTJ SE wiN.rr r.;3.J y r .<G AL a MO TB ADDIRON 1 // y P'.% / SLY/TIA(ARE CHO.£9YJG _ I / '^ + FYLASE II • Iv".RE0.NEO: H SPACES ss I aua ccv...aa'J I M . L r/ /..;.% 3/Z % �.i.rer 1 A.•M Brno.,/ Prwravo PROreNO_ 13 VASES 30 SPADES 1 r' r ATAMR OE PROPOSED tors /LOT I<oT : P ,/ zR<rRsrcvrs co,ER.a DLO ExEm mr I . w •rr ID / /'�` ice.•. LOT>,w.l 9UY4ARY INARi-INTERIOR w105LAPE .0n m. •LF.....vs fALaHv s I\ I I 3f{ /i• N Lm,; -7...';' ....sru.Lr.�",--" SITE PLAN / .v j���',�L����1 OF - / I /�/,/�,+- / lD MIY CNARr-MITRIOR LANDSCAPE ' .rlr L J ,v[r r:i.'• \ i/` 'S:�®©u1 ..... ,-r�Lar,.... 1"..w...� {::T Pi LOT 3.BLOCK I (�h py� '/ r u y"wi 4 r*M' cTn c.c.s: Np., aT� ®�l�} 1 fAN,TN .p�ji�''� \ .`,,./ �/ T • us" . CONCE r . ��N �F 5'HUNAK Ct1B•piABON(,NC (`� {r..�,� r ` LOI Ml I /'� ('i ``� -' // '• ®�®� 00 LOT U.BLOCK I // .® I C� ti CITY CMS N0.1A00-0 J G ALLCAP A AI ow EN/A7 IB ALOIR�V i` \\ t SCY/LIFKANE G405SINL' y_ �mi��w w l�?nTA.50_QIMT-MRTERYAROS i, r TM6 *N NUR �wymowrN �/ ' �q `.. Plik.¢-/ v u�ra• "". :. «`". .� '"" CORNER ADDITION d TA !• niN• merNe m.Lo c-,�""/ hada =MM 3; -- ...r. ,n r-A > CR EAVES SURVEY,CITY OF SOHTHLARE. TARRANT COUNTY.S00 TELlS P � .`5 %�' \ rt�ea��t© ...- rr d�e OINSR: ENOWS. 791 7►�i ©.-EliM®���© �„ --Iv-7 '• , CM OF SOUTHLANF RAruOND L.GOODSON.JR..INC. .L `tefr/ I u P ` \ �..w..vy,�. ���� - S . ] ! RRf NOMN r6MNA<AY¢MUR 3.H G YI31W F. -.V.,' 0y,.�•q, , r• ��,4w�,y SOUlNIAta.rJ Mils 3.1.300 a B.rT �7,%rrt. O!at&OLX I <R,.I Nr-9.SOI y<J.s.Ty TS;tr-.r3R 7. Sp/1/NAKE LYlOSSING \ WO T.TR-/IRO .' a . �. - ` Mr)73/-333.Lr331 —may so.r.r.a 03177: mxz I.WOO curAtan Am Au.. ra —Ea ,b„SATE a.,EEe ..r� l • v Tar =Talc sesa , crwsmox surf 9uRR.cs Pla TALL 9I.hLTOO WPM) e- ,1311 NOLE rD.PLATE --_— -___-- map— outhlak•. LOCK VENEER Ca..am,w„SLATE WI/WES I I 111A - ��- -IIIMMI =ram«w.. - _—_- xv�Ea S,EF ,� 1 I �I11 Z-' 'a ee 11AI11 oaovNSRa. V" �wuwr so..u. g e. ' .c-1 rt N fi r i 'leSidik Ve �ie,w 5mssrEn 4. AeREn S .,4T ,�i � ® o.RATE, -I I k I a Y '' "� kk� ii ii ii _ 1 T- ir �' CEO,. , Ess E=.,e ,3?rrr�i 11/JI _ _ .,...:trty.- ,:. 4 TALE ILASOC VENEER V aRaav, CO.ow4 e ..N ._ 14 ,1 v'E IetEaYr0 00L SAW w4P`Rl'SGTEN SI ON! CN AND 9R EAtE , TATA EONIF tirylEp rrW.l.,tD SR.-SPLIT ENEE CDWEST ELEVATION 1.,:i SCALE,V .-0. Ai I \ // ly21111•. I _Ili I L. _, 7),j r 0, ( _ .. . 4. x ct� O, '. E5'' z E--4 QQ� F I� f nil S N — _ i di __ _ SwfD AA¢:, d�. T i i PSA i linT:11-177HT N.�� ..o...r. r. %�` ®I IVY EI..R.! CIO NY6ILi - Sheet Title b WAX) Sheet Title WEST ELEVATION -- -- 1 : .$ ., I I .fit 1 i I- - _�. v-c •-i IF .-. .r �s-x r'r Praj.No.:4A8.10 Iota 8/OV00 Drorm 0LL/ORS (4Checked:,IAA PARTIAL 01 PA FLOOR PLAN Z '(� p� Approved: dNA REC),11J N n 12000 sheet number R N NaRrR F NaR,N Al of sheets • C.O..v,ES.. "Fail w.E.49Ee a „r., ■■ a0'3 a,.E LOUVER aPw vExa. --J7 ,a�a e�-: outhlok w.rr II II �_ .r r° — - — ,a ;Pal 1 c' / cmvoar�w ze.nEES� �!s K wP.aw r o r['Tlr ! 31y�� 'pL IS �' ■�• P .En "E=,E �� wrEr sr lw.x l� I lir 112 F+1 I lifer 4YS - .F ;- ...,.sE.- at g �e v rw ,tt+.E 1' �! jtr``u�r oLITENS ri V■ war SOWERS e$ I • ' '' E _, h � �1�l�c _ _ � ',iit tt) ."kk II �� V �.�=Inf tt II 1 v:�4 ik - IIOjII : :1111H IpII I,N_:1t. IIIIIII 111111 ..i„- - Ii11 I1 7 I 11 1 1i.,:.11rll I.:t7 1 _ IIII■ III ' 11 III a1 Mi''.,. 59:L'_'' '�h'.nE ��ii1 1��Y'Fllii1�1.��,,3r>IB�,+ i=2 RI, � C/� 1 s. ,.,t�aaaaa*:.s ...��.ar .:..z.r...e.r a:a -,_... .s,.:... •-•... F-i -�ov.cnEw eP.a vEwEEP cE.zwc amtPa iw...VS •••.•, -TaPoov 1 s.az •'� ,wcP VENEER i..040044 vs, sv"wo • ro e,e'a`a/ ry Iu)svEas �ewzE rwrEo INSULATED s a. Ew'L MT.?"' / L"'I' ✓✓«// 13:1 =• gri aaH 02 SOUTH ELEVATION s,a a.w, SCALE:V/."-Y-,, W.rEPrN$E HH 4.4 O w l p..1.1 • C ' p, , L U A. \ / \ / , \ / \ , -- - - 09 � HL: j; \ \ \• I f / Q�.1_�Vim, \ / / 8�� ,(..,\,,,,\:\ A ,\ Lim" ! //,•\\ i-,,,,:' - - , L LL_ LiArr -1115. - '-'7-.''' L / \ ; ,, ' i \ / \ ar±/ — '''' PSA — f h `_N.. o[— i Ir 7557 R..11,,R.d S..1.470 -I 9 LL- 1?A 2 11R IPA%) •—, Sheet Title SOUTH ELEVATION 11, r-ar ;-r j., _ Pro No.:4156.10 x -r �r e`_—}_vr _—y-a v-a• __ —•. _ e — n+• • *-.• Dote' 9/Oi/00 } _..— :re-v ----+ Dram: OIL/ORS /Q��. Checked. 01 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN ! ��! Approved W scnE A,b.. N ' .Y y�t.l)J U N 0 1 2000 sheet umber aw www .E�.w A2 or sheets • COUPu9igR MOOT SINgEs— mo+_-7,.w.,:-, T.0 PLATE II 1 II .� 46 o_uthla MC Crwr• ::III�IIIII — — -- COMPOSPON SLATE SNELEq� `\ �_ �v6➢STER WVOLIs]N SLATS BNCES OKv 1� ONLENEESO STEEL / OJW.1gP01its Ijy 4.1 b oorrsParts - �� T.O.PEAS T.O.PLATE 'L _ �� raw i t J i = - wru voexR I I I I a �! ", I s �' ... :...-.- ._...— 3 r.i.. s1K VwsNrt r..(E, OPESE VENEER vwSM F sitwEevw CRL.w'• SCOIDOvw OFs ,I - •CPpRIw OIFNY V J �� siOaE rcf V%0RE S1tlE- NIT FACE �� SINE M%FRiIN6t 4rsiE�SA M� �ya r 02 EAST ELEVATION pRA FywJ j.� w a F-1 a0 Ni --a, (ii : .=-:: , = , , 1T 17719 U 1 ,/ I r--'------- _i ji._._...„ -- -Til E--1 33 I ; W 44 ..--___ ,,,tfp kP,,. 4.•4J f .$tom °F41-.__ _....__. --_--.—. -•--_—_ - B i PSA , .°. s — --/ -i — \ • I Sh1DJYYP e l6T9tMU55 XI EAST ELEVATION . �: :L : .' ( � �.� I I n- Prot.No.,4158.10 Dote: 6/0I/00 BCDJUN U 12000 Drawn: alJDRS @PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN Checked JAM 01 I ,,�/ Approved: JMA NO sheet number 1.1...NORTH NPR A3 of sheets • TN............' Cm00,17:SLATE SM.. =..411r TO ROW ;; LOUVERS RV.VONER--N. L. I gmr „. , ---,.. ;T -\N---t---11111114 -% outhA ro..„0, .-- ..„ _.-..,,,,, .. _ .. _ ,GALVIT•TETI STEEL—, °... ;'IT; .; ;-NN ---',, ••••.,.., RI • 4. 1 1111111:3 W CONPOSITIGN SLATE SHINGLES-- , fiagfp-apq >4,,,,,,,..-_,,,c,V.e. r,41.,Lq,,v,I,T-44..mw,r14.212:-,24....-12.,,,,R7T:t•-:L5,,,,-,-,g,,vii-- -e-,41,...,- ` 0 T PL. ,ILL .N4k,, ..- -wir...t.d.r..utt .? = , ______:_ .T.___ PASOA TRN • •••. 40143[MINA 5_.T; 4.4 N17,414.L..4. 1..•,-•,41,--OLL.,..ZWIL*.L.,,,Hrs„.1.1 MILK SOLEFILS 0 PL A*;.; T6.'I tilitiii/N Plii.1.";-;IF, .'10}11;Li I.P7i ilti; If.rifl.1 Mill II-I 111.,i! 4.11„. f,qi..-f- - , ,iitrilitoi , If gay[rus.,1, iu ,....ar .,.,,e I?, tule,,i.„,e.4 4_,Jet, ,, ...._. .„ „, .. 7,, gi.,4-4.0',.--_•-,--i--i.---t±,t-'t'''-``'''.7 T --`..-ri - --- 31. 11111,VIII710 '-.'l!T;i1"1111] • 14;I;747;1 14 1 1,....x..---. ,-,..;,': ,,.,. ,-..--L---..txq,,-..T•i----.1, 'A'rgl i'lir Id WI:HIV . II iirlt IVii IN*.,'"I:A;41`qrtli,,:'II ' , iTiii '1.'lltleill'Illi II-fi..c. rt141-TVAllt-'''''''''.e" '''::'--;"P'r'l I' - 1111111111011 11. 111111111110111 [1,II):. :1 :qt!4,,'1.:irs.Liu;!Irn,.'i., -; --,:- :,1.1 :, if,1111 .-- .1 _-A.,----r--- _.—-,-,--:.- :- •_ _ _..k- :'-'-'7'''' '_' '-'-'-:,'7''--:--- ' 4! Mi. .-.r.izeir.:,..oitt:Illt.z..,11! a/I f,437!!... -it,:If"11.1'arg%.:J.f:1,.ii:p.'.\ At .;,,,,..,0;;;:, * viimm-nt-y2wittivu...lpfiwalilmitaiitiolitlarfavirrianialiim.-- ? Awl nom .;.,• mom 1111111 .,1 EiTilaffprzgrInnalliv!.4 AEC. CA ......-..,..--•,...ivg.i.,,,e...imvi..r.imitLIT:44:: . 1 LOCK vENEER -MOO.OtE.- OLNIPSTER OZIE=.9XTIONX 1 i7STOA/7%.° STONE-seur VOCE ;T0,'''T°4 Vie"' ESC? ENCLOSURE IN STEEL LAP E.-LOU. BrrICFITX" // 1. 4 r4=1:2,ZEZZVitr'_ MAY{ MASONRY--/ ;TO1C'etfrIMCE WIN BRONZE INTED MUTATED OLT...4 SCREEN*ALL iViT,47.71, •-•1 >0 C)NORTH ELEVATION CC1 w 71V-rt—tt,J 0 P. 1 j. .] , ' , . , 1 t I 1 1 1 1 JJ '.'_i ' . „ .. . ' a a 17.-- II . . ! 1 ... .r. , . ... , . 1 .11111111111111' . • { , ..._ , J 121 1-1-4 o' . , , ; . , , , l -L,.._ 1-. _ __ , 1 r __b. L . , T —1 cf) —'•3___I-..- . r- . ' P4 - rw? f ,i 1Y. . , 0__ ,., t , ,,, I ,-_ ,, ,,, r-___--] r - 1 , 0-1. . . , 44 . i . . • . . ! al . , , . . , !---- 11 ...--..„2„ . ..,.:..,.. .. !, C. r.1 1 , . • . . ., • .,-ia:--; A. .. 0 . . .F.: - ,I . ! , PSA. , , . I 1" • , !, • , , 1 i , , Wile,l'ie 75Th (TM tegt-ii115 I IQUI 6.11-41111 leiliX/ i I ; 1 ! • , ' ,' ' I 1 •I! 1 I I I I I !l , i ,. ' , I I I I Sheet Title. NORTH ELEVATION ., . I , ; I : ,, , , -, I 1 I I 1 — , ; I .1 „..... , . , !1,. . -•-",' ..f •4.} .-r S"-...;•-' .,-0' .I, •-", ,_ _ , _... . ; „.., __ _. __ ; .... ; tr-le tee' it'' ,tssr. .;I .kr,K... 4. . ,,.-.- . . Proj.No:4150.10-- . _ ..0 Dote: 6/01/00 Drown: (111./ORS owsi , 0,,,,,---.) Checked,JAN , ©PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN ( pEcx JUN 012000 Approved: J44 slIP17; sheet number PL.KOHN TRUE HORN of sheets ......_ .._ 90£ 00 ,"".. m „a ". SN3NNION3 N W1SNO3 3,41'L t MOSCOOO-1 ONONAVS SVX31 '3)IVlHLf10S JO ALIO \ a� �.k / :� 1 � -, - unlavJ ism — sda ��'" ; /•' %a / I., s NVId ONIaV2l0 ' ? / ® 000Z .� 0 Nllf' ! " w.,, 1 `£ A / 1h I `� © r 35vNd ''l % A,.mvwBf'O o1,107 "J r M ayssoeo 3.vrr9rxis /' "� : ��y I g 'ON L375aple 7a„too • ) / lt;.:-"_ Y •i 8 1 + v / f s /r ww = «� _ _i ,� V'* • f , yd\\1 I \Il IWO ..x,M".N„ ZEE:.• --- aQ areas 1.107 / . -— 1I Ijl II I �aNevov o• ztli o nr r tau'"'•`1N1O1^`a,j5rIrS.f ewervu.aes eusa nea t,3Mnr�rBn a•revn'r,w Milan �\t� i yif'�'• '�\ �'( / (�l es 3> mst womm.,na ,..w.m.:a�,...:,.a.o°o \ _.FA � F , NO![Y[S SNJ Yx3� ,'� 1 7.71WwNSNac "ems ar7a� ,1 4 . . I O ayss 3rvownas 4 ♦, /' '\ I t�. \ ii II 1 11 ' /,w I I s y' i,\\ \•��T: a / j �j III I �aiawen 5 �I mr'>o+'c.°:,sn ,/... ':: �, 416,4Vik I� I NZ )\ dio �/ III YNy l9 Ill • 6 :. gym ' --�--- -•* t �4 (k — >°(I �' ...,a."w, o e.,..,•,+a.o P.w,EI ':asays .AVL,v70,313 7.107 IOS �,�C Y II / t owf dwii. ."-,1"'' �"'�"'! 4J.;'� �� / 1 B 11I 11l j-I' -' e;" ,«,.o "w sae- !"»,W,",- �, ��— �: �/ /-��: © \ CF•j*%ici I1 I)r 1 j 4S 9ivinkv ,, 11 II II �I I , 3N I 1 I I w,v; tIairjIf V ril:j a „ ., /+'`:t" f m \ m �,�{►��, j raxt 3Hatm ' r ..awe r /' ' r ® ®F' '/_ A }' e���?it 3<Of '\ 1 ►AIt� i'CLi.7 "f�7 i N .CZ'tY 1 M nva1 v�nix p YB sows' W .n 1 7„,>,u ",r.em: ,", m'z r o, A. I'MI"'Cral SN3iCAnrs o �!/' XWv// 1 1 ,_ II 3SVHd 1100V30 SAWN ." row,a,w.w pap w...«w aw app.,.w a/ �` �. n301�,.nw 1 a�•s�o�r+a.mrv, ,ddFnOAroJ I I 1 I 1 • I A I 1 .„._ O I ar e'me 1 III CN r2.1PA11 ,IDArt I i .N J 1 r]aA9vALF EYM/ �� UnCrJv GFxfNn!NOR"5 I LAYERS MEADOW PHASE I m cvrlam r.,�M I i •r•" rx rcr _ NG�600�A P Y .wpm.me'•p 'r.,.�e;m m.v cno-e)w: A wm ut r.s cvrr r`'� I I rOe'ru[ $ rtrnn _ " orio iwo.. roee.e 1 1 MAROD£4L4 NS q^c." rt a , -�.._ _ rarcl I y, .A.c. j /! j :—`�"_ _� - y®`�'"1 • \lk �\ SCMOTISKYS DELI ��•^r me,,.+ w a A4e.err ae.N w...xn I / ,, --' —T _ AVM soa-)or ASIII rrevNJar; ' I >rs — '' � \_ -I-1 '�\ UUU ,n.,,n.am for m n I6 6460. E / AA _ i' a rM�o...�.��m ...rn.o„y rr ,C (.� ' scup nn ' .<r l i� i� e N� d t� ' ��-' "/ .,.•�ff _. 1 \II 1`,yi 'III ` \`�`,,, �t P r i� I 11 `IRE II 11 11 1 11 1� LOT 3 myrArt. 11 I tII II NA V:a 11 I I ,� 11 II Ai'; PROPOSED 6U/LONG /.' !.� 1.-e MI • 11 I FAc rr I fF 65B.55 ' i i C I II II I 10, - - / \,\ I,.�t '' ,.6 ` ter•/r+'/ save A.re PRASE N E III 6 ®` y It / RAWNG fit ,1� < .rA�,� . �� I ,LOT 2Ris, I` 't 9f/ \ b .�.� i" munaPHA amsvNc / _ ,t %/ J „,.,,tz:0, aw rcr I 11! I� ' ,*- Cs `1 \ Y/'7 / � RYAS(N RENEAErAREs IL 1 .� TEXACO GAS ITON @1 �� .YS- �'�' • n...iw..e,s '�I • :/tom // ( .! 6ro..wk / 5� T/1. OM.w.«mV and( n.rew zr- 1 /% r tor�� = I� am A maw r a ALIEN AKi!Q ApG'OlGV f/y//�j� / AXO71lMF CROSSING ArMa my uv .«m.0 AAee: I a /;'�i/ 'w�/ ` PIQ a rtn SUN YI - t_. ` \411.4 yak / // SHEET NO. I LIT),lla AGO(I E } ^/1l1 !n1 Y A a A�ONO.N re AL00 V I ,.' A f Itd'i"I� )��``� �� `4�4 Q �t� sti y♦\ ,.. IPHASE I Mr AA WATER & SANITARY SEWER PLAN F. '�1�', .. • DPS — WEST FACILITY 7.--41" /y � PHILLIP SWAGER ASSOCIATES N / \ STY OF SOUSLAq r TEXAS �/ t s�� RAYMOND L GOODSON JR.•INC.CGNSULTING ENGINEERS OOSION WC VI 'Y° RLC KG 6-1-00 r=.o' ....0 00 306 I I y 'Jcss 1054 ,rss ,a-ss Joss Jess ,css Joss ,o-s_ m•ss- --_. - _ • Mt at pe ME O^Ss - JG:£a-'I.—.. .-.p —�aK rWf —a/E "" I RANDOL MILL�ZOAD \ 1 I ` — __ _ :-w 4-w t•w -+•W 4 W f N �.L7 t'Y �+ L r .w - ll E'w---ti X. 2. 11 ma =- - ,1 w- .!_ 6 '� \/O o� �-s si , �r M eQ3 1 n ' 1 . r•, R ejc I I .41 e y II 't jig \ t_-- 'L1�`-1\ 1 \\ j. • £ :` n 1 J,J ,, ',��--- r5—/ \ 1 \ '� ', •.',. './'u ��� t 8-- r\ _¶-_-! '11- y _ F \'±. 1 . \ SSA �;� II a J7�:a i \,\s� 1 t: 'a���� y ..i 11 J y[y, J s � l�_ Oh \ 111 1 _ •,,`. 1 1, .,+n v^ Iii R r. •1.a09 - �'1 - 1 tl 1 �1 GAR"'.: 111. 31 \(� II II 1 in �i • g 13 �> • R' r\ 111 I�1549\ 13 ,E R•Il_` ' •r� 'i .1l •' �?w;. 11 \ J i_1 E �'o'AVI 'I.J�„.t 8r . �r!•:'.'i'K 11 '� 1 'it 1 _J� 1 ;' ' 1� 1 1 I 'x --,r "ta. I , 1 • : . \‘ _ v 1+. • le � y,�„�-"_ty�C.,+_jIW'(K`\\—/�!' : oy/_---- 0. , 'It t `...., 1 / 11 II �1 I �:��\\ �' • \ - .Gyp'/ / �JA .,` \ i,�U\ ( 'JD.F //,/ : `\� i,`c• J. - y S�\ ��\\ \ cam, ')\ c\ r // \ '� 39 /1 ' si' \\ � '�. g • / = =11 a ,1 !\ i , - .c ,,- ar' .• Gam _ ''9, \ '1 4�_+-' T -r sgse ,�• 0I----' ,, 1 1rF�' �. 10 VP"AY: \ ' - --';'--- C s, „,' ,,41i.p,iit:,4 \' vii.7,, ,..,''''\ \ 0 , --...:\ tl> . ..1..---- •.41,..0., ›-__4-k'QL-:\ spy\ illiP \\ may' ; o,;` I ,X ': t -\ 11 ,'•..�,�i " 0' gl �Q : \Esc \ '' i .....,7- iti,, \.....,r. T Aint!...,;;..._ diii."..,,..... 4; 1117 73 m .:� Vim•��' J� c II I,8.�� N \ tom - RE:SHEET L1.3 l 1• , � I9.. xE *$ ;I =a$f I - Southiake DPS % 4515 A _ Sa West Facility •C = ' A d W w --!, �� . I:,- ,:, /s --,.. — ; ' / RE:SHEET L1.1 kcij- M )‹ .1:01, _it ` - 64 / — ,/' Rya ,_ ■ • a ——t? .' X ' oft ' x. ///� /k�.1 /. /L vi.,vrr..nreavc sw C. OL I % 'd , \ �'�1 : :4.- \ '--;:r44fir.''''''' c7S.17 \ mor ..Afxr..-..-"' ,... CA I I I ,• i 1B \ y 6 f M1l \,,£\-. i'/ el, V 1 Pe* I i , / ,i°: A LANDSCAPE PLAN �) }'< _ xq.G SCALE.T•20'O• "="01 / B M10 / ' oawa c.emewm iwr 5G 1 B s>u Richmond Aunt'. pad,Texas/S206 Fos 21O/O26-9562 .07,380;s :ctivg,4 71 • • / LANDSCAPE 9A / PLAN Proj.Nd.. ." coI JUN 0 12000 o ce � APP"ved. oc. ,,,,Z-N / 6G o / ,heel umber L1.2 df ,heels • • 11`'.F4...S '45 -_,,,'' PLANT n1AiERIn1 LG5Li0 a Sr O...a! - /a m ` '••,_,•! 5 �• p• ALL ETREES SLESS ATW.N 3IL �'I CALIES PER. I d NOSE THISDEFAILAP e••i. O cAeoe•Mee °� 44F if '� �.•. ��\ `` suorKnme 44:'�pCA•. ow.i sweet Haze 1ew. �A ,AWN ,� A _ 1���', ,-.,' /� © TREE STAKING DETAIL © TREE GUYING DETAIL -� .� N i';�`,`•\ /-dG SCALE.N.T.S. SCALE.N.T.S. 111111 iiiV \\` \\•� w• ....,H.H,veto a rwizH ew"c< aZ 1 ` Ned SeeCAFKAPON5 .r a) i �4: %.� SHRUB PLANTING�h DETAIL O STEEL EDGING N •.•1 c�� r84/ D SCALE.N.T.S. SCALE.N.T.S. x --'Vs:,/ `�, LEH 3,BLOCK 1 NRINART CHART-9.YeRTA.D4 al �S.I �\\ • �y��P�,(!" •l" ,7�� s�1'.w " ' "'�' 'mow ' ."^•� ""°• ,�"�..H"�..... ."`�""`" 11�['.Cv iV RE SAVED/REMOVED i.. . `�,� i;: '; 10�� X ce gy.... Qx.rylm cK. w,.scraot. Icc.*roH rot cK. .we u+Ewr !fry,—"I!�Sy j e i e• B. se of o en e. de cA�P�'000 y1��y� Vic � ... ...: "'` n —° _ as��i"¢�i � ' _ a r�� Q N et e. .:6). z,,..„ ..... ..... P,k_i�0 a?� "w s• M+; :"r^ti"b.•» u — — .. ;ram F{L V 1 : ... Q� ./........ Q RAT—_ eo ....,\A„... • •'O �' `, 3....• AeMARY GOA.••• RlrtftYM LN.n., �� -3 f fir_ — �r _i N.I µ —� AV.4/bwTTii ',RAMP 5 -6,1---Z 3-r:- ..nf-r- i 0 wooer Immo se ea 119 m Me um me 7 . j1 S�-y*2'6',' ce••••••••••• a•.»i.....»w. .»..., .. a.-- ..r �.„.m», —e E�i 6- GLM_ r• -',._____3 4-- •.%1. NOFf- ......tows T52M ...,,. ~, •.....-. A ] is nCGE e._ 5 e _t -:- _ T - nt. zi.zi,n o / �• _7 '�t�,/gi8i Z s. r � br U5€O fm:21./BN SSBY I CANOPY _ rMINI e • �� • •` ,.... ». ........... °,.,-.-°w t•.. ......... - f� -it— _A_ srol - `n�. ..."w e.'",'•a..""u w....sw sr..»... `". ^ T �`_nrry&_- �1—_ R MTO'iRR wl».° o �_ FC alc .i G n Q _ ._ For Sheet SC �/ ` m. a w........a�».»r»..n.r.w...�...'..rw u _ bL FMKeea< 4 e _.*_—ri"- eCRr� u � "sr,.»»"""••" m.r. T1 -- LANDSCAPE ` ...I � .s � bac_ �Hc`t°VS_ .�-r�s-D —fin— "0:� PLAN tilt..•.w."..T..ww+-...»...k.,.�........-r..» , T .rc s i!• eL useo Rei• • Nw: T •r a ty�ar _w.users__ B.te: wawa _.zc<BERm �Fr.HpvtL_. B_ zwee OLANDSCAPE PLAN _� .., rote., ............ ,..,.».»» : . _�_ H — w - rf6 Checked: a.. SCALE.1'.2p�-p• » REUO i Ui sheet number ----- al sheets CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-343 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 981, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, W. R. EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2833, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2, W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500; AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 4.054 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES LIMITED TO A PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY AND TO INCLUDE ANY ASSOCIATED OUTSIDE STORAGE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 1 O 2.I adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 2 g R-22 and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 3 8A-23 therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition .to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit «C„ SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 4 9-24 be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTIWP-FILESIZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 5 1 A_2b SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 6 'n.2Lo of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 7 'A21 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES1ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 8 0-28 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.054 acres LOT 3, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION Being a tract or parcel of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake,Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and being all of Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas, part of that tract of land conveyed to Robert G. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 3976,Page 12,Deed Records, Tarrant County,Texas,all of Lot 2 and part of Lot 3, W.R. Eaves No 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain&Crawford"found for corner in the northwesterly line of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. No. 1709)(a 130 foot right-of-way),said rod being the southerly common corner between Lot 1, Block 1 of said Corner Addition and Brown tract; THENCE North 50°54'50" East, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 228.82 feet to a 1/2"iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped"RLG"set for corner at the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 39°05'10"West, a distance of 190.47 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG"set for corner, THENCE South 51'04'37" West, a distance of 146.72 feet pass a chisel mark found at the easterly common corner of Lots 1 and 2 of said Corner Addition, and a total distance of 342.34 feet to a chisel mark set in the east line of Randol Mill Road(a variable width right-of-way)from which a chisel mark found bears South 55°50'40"East,a distance of 0.31 feet, said chisel mark set being the westerly common corner between said Lots 1 and 2 of Corner Addition; THENCE North 00°04'07" East, along the east line of said Randol Milt Road, a distance of 361.86 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain& Crawford"found for corner, said rod being the southerly line of a tract of land conveyed to Harold Saunders by deed recorded in Volume 7232, Page 428, Deed Records, Tarrant County,Texas; THENCE North 79°24'07" East, along the southerly line of said Saunders tract, a distance of 81.23 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain&Crawford"found for an angle point, said rod being the northerly common corner between said Lot 2, Block 1 of Corner Addition and said Brown tract; THENCE North 79°32'27" East, continuing along the southerly line of said Saunders tract, a distance of 64.60 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped"Brittain&Crawford"found for an angle point, said rod being the southerly common corner between said Saunders tract and Myers Meadow Phase Two,an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A,Slide 2160, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 79°54'00" East, along the southerly line of said Myers Meadow Phase Two, a distance of 418.68 feet to an iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." found for corner, said rod being the northerly common corner between Lots 1 and 2 of said W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition; N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 9 80-2q EXHIBIT "A" THENCE South 39°00'45" East, along the common line between said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 199.46 feet to a 1l2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG' set for corner in the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, said rod being the southerly common corner between said Lots 1 and 2; THENCE South 50'54'50" West, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 380.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 178,614 square feet or 4.05 acres of land, more or less. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 10 c^,30 ro a " o 4 3 C y' i 74 hLl i 4 , I ralMOJ• oo S1, or •..*;'ra .�wsOR9rYs 0[u I -t r 1 5 MOOTS O PUMAS sea .wn1 ""'°' d » Li WAILSM, "' — 5 m '" o � r ,.ram''' E�f $t r w$ �". t ,4., r _ gip. m �� [I T7h _ '- */f 1 f a �pl��Wiel: ��AA .a�¢3a? *' tv.v1/411:,-,„„µ%me r „..: a ,.+ ... �/ w J _ a r .rrc�"mmv + I Iv 'e.. (y,a.... °"° r'_i rcvro N .}I r A Q 'id i4. i n�T'r..5.A.I /off 'et' ..,w ad. D II 1 z 1, •`;1< o PROPOSED J' / � �i1'' �� O sl 1 , qtr LOVING `� P ,1, l-SIDR0NUIDwc �1\\`N6 4+d.; ' 1" l7r////1 Z I i V i car & '` • �1,s3J,.... `,as / :'fFf - MT LAVE a✓mrwwx co VZ \ 1S I S ' j/~ } � � •/ .�c __ac F �c 9 - ' ? i1 K a � �ef r IF ' _ o 1, � r x, C J g .r;'' % swtiao�a Y•ry ® - t "i v jY , rF.n cursor Nowt a ar c r..,rm yy ` ,c x S I Q 1 i 1 4 r T.Tl2 ft' r a j. f� i•/ SUE DATA SM�MARY a0 s 1 �� d�W s a [or Li OT! 1�1 PVAK AgYhON I WCDaNA WV c t I CONCEPT PLAN [t• L1fE RAN tri / r/ / £DML IOW. ( .� " ,mo.. ' 9 I. r" 1`J,y'' z" *Y / '.owYr ASV. o s s�-r i uss or.ro V I v 1. ',. L� d`• / r µo r S LL�tt, ,b s.PLre- - H.[1 KIAS SO-.WSJ, y e , ` ?1, i4: /!r: 0/,JP swJa`Ogxs;ws le.wsw.�: ArNA.caaao4 Arue a aea. I L r■ JFXAGO DAs STAMW / ,yN - �/ 0',r�.±S .r,4.T.a dtnJ> —rtan)Y — W „�1 Laiew'LLi6'im°'"niav ,: m`., - d •F• d"r• SIT w.wAfN.. rn � \ \ "' � >P •4 n.Yl rtLr 'Sr•TT n r/'a ar •1� Iu m...r,, `',L. 4 j'�`�c� �CCd ./t,' ..c.Lra..s.a N. _ vanY/Lx rm•vrl:nrY/sr. a ! ,{y// /. ao,/ ( wNLve N. anzr",i,7.1 Sr rzroJ sr. ,.r r AIM a Or IRS �/)1 L '/✓.'�.+r. fo \ LW uST 41M.LOIC/C4 AO,Sr (i x I Y .�IV}',Y//•', r m.4 noa..au ... n,n - 'rr n.0 r. 1 S ALJd ha II MOWN 1 I /A'`,- /' _ � ' PNAA PMM. p.N6. to VALET SO PA. a1.1 ,, / 4diAl'�'^ Pl..MOM is SSW. SODM= = • ,Z% ..1 EY MOW.LOSS ,LOS 'r for M're 4EHtl Y/OM s Wrafillifiliiiiiiiir / ' / A w, ru n,n•.�„r o•w s rf-AAMT N.CUIr ,aa s2tJr a/ex N LOT L SLOW,ruaf,ur MART-rM1'laLl1 LArorcw[ Y Air". '` / /�' •..r._. LA,Ir.L,rr-� ,' LOT,.,LOC,T r �t y - .w p -- -cr. �i 3 �w t I �:., aTT a.T �I ,: \ 1"x ROM sa* Lrwt-arratNNos (: srxwwa CORPONArwt r.c I •r �,•� `� ... ••w •,•• ••.�. /_.I COT mua[RNo o-loe 1 O AtL %O AXIOM r� r, \ set Now r - -= - , •u't LOT A sYWrt owl/-m.arum [' /Aralso' � 'aN � -Alit _ ;- —' '..("fir CORNER IDD1170N A Jaow f CS.. u•A ICI+" r•,- e r r ..• rw -. r ., N.R.CAW soars INSTANT Nu SOO ..a.,u : .// ^'�•sa e, W r1TY or sou.a,. ..rurANr crouxrr,r[x.,s r ..j.v r- _ • ..- • .. 4. i $ a.Nra: tNCNar. // �.'�/ w„,- - a •.. •.f- ...•r L g_f C/TY Of 90 M4M1T AYYONO L.!AOD41N.1R.fNC. �� I, •r• \ • n.r r.rr� ' ti+.v•+�•rr -• •• (aryl /(ar MOSS Nr MIT rua/LILLUS.M urrr-.rM ,�, R rlao'/ • ra-rraa LS'A1S3 la.,..... n.......,. N WO r414-004(f EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-343.DOC Page 12 WA32 �--` City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-048 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-344—First Reading - Rezoning and Concept Plan - Lot 2R, Block 1, Corner Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Concept Plan on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres. PURPOSE: Appropriate zoning and Concept Plan approval are required prior to platting and development. LOCATION: On the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) to property owners within the 200' notification area. Twenty-nine (29) to property owners outside the 200' notification area. RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from outside the 200' notification area: • Charles W. Free, 550 N. Randol Mill Avenue, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received June 7, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000;Approved(3-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-048ZC.doc Tract Map ZAOO-048 J I PRIPIII �441 ."��� _=.-�� - HILLSIDE\ A j 4 4, ••=o.Nm0•au1111r,* ,, i --_ice ., sricrlwo ��s4�s$ ■ AN �'�� 1r. • . ■ �i- ,1, •,I iatt fa .-NE .-- _ 1 - '• ir�'f�'��' .•;ems' m"" I ■ 'I 1. - 774NSO' 1 VA AV I-' r j h,IN 11110 tif r ..„„: „ ___, ., , ....to' ■E , �� or at dil,„:whowoosilik, 141 N . /:ti k Ali „____. _INIVINSIp A -.k 1 ow nor`v -. . ,___NOP. 73 _ _ paNii..,, IP" I • Nr Imlb,Aatt. ] - , 1 IP Ic----_-re 1 %or f 1 1 . .F le - — a Milk IOW NO Illg t RE' q�-� -- 1fait m� E 2000 0 2000 Feet N A(..... j �W E S 8g-2 Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-048 sgilII .ram m ■ - MIi dr , wirmEnir E ti. ;,11 111111Alli 11111111. ..40, TE-rem N.i=• vier0 giMppilkim „..__. ______ Ili All r ' 4 � ■■ I- all OA • PI 1 4 _____ Ilislii__------7'. li SS MIN III .14Tim - NI .41 r-----------t_i _ iuiiii__, Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. Myers Meadow Homeowners Assn. 1. "R-PUD" 1. Medium Density Residential 1. 4.18 acres 2. City of Southlake 2. "C-2"P'AG" 2. Retail Commercial 2. 4.88 acres 3. Southlake JV 3. "C-3" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 9.20 acres 4. McDonald's Corp. 4. "C-3" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 1.06 acres 5. Albertson's Inc. 5. "C-3" 5. Retail Commercial 5. 5.55 acres 6. M&H Food Mart 6. "C-2" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 1.02 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-048.doc 78.3 • • City of Southlake, Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-048 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 6/02/00 Project Name: Concept Plan —Department of Public Safety West Facility, Commercial APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Phillips Swager Associates 667 North Carroll Avenue 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 670 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: 817-481-5581 X730 Phone: 214-692-6115 Fax: 817-481-0036 Attn: Garland Wilson Fax: 214-692-6118 Attn: John Main CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y * See informational comment Lighting Y Complies * The applicant has met all requirements of previous reviews. * Driveway access to this site is subject to approval of driveways associated with City Case ZA00- 047 or by other means of approved access. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-048CP3.doocc City of Southlake, Texas Case No. 00-047 Review No. One Dated: 5 — 30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 2, Block 1 (Site Plan Southlake DPS West Facility) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 5 - 22 - 00. Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: * Because landscaping is subject to Site Pan approval, a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the proposed Site Plan. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan is required to be submitted with the Construction Plans when the applicant submits them for review by the Building Department to receive a Building Permit. * In the Bufferyard Summary Chart, please correct the length of the North bufferyard to reflect the entire length of the property boundary line. (564'). Please correspond the required plant material with the correction. * All interior landscape calculations are correct as shown for the current phase of development. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: * Although a Landscape Plan is not required to be submitted with the Site Plan it will be reviewed at this time as though it is a part of the Site Plan approval. * Please correspond the Interior and Bufferyard Summary Charts with the submitted Site Plan Summary Charts. * The applicant is proposing to take existing tree credits for a majority of trees with in the bufferyard landscape areas of the site. Credits shall only be granted if the Tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined by the Landscape Administrator at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. Only existing trees which are within fifty feet (50') of the property line and have a minimum fifty percent (50%) of the drip line within a landscape area shall be granted credits toward reducing the required plantings. * The applicant is proposing to take a 20% reduction of required plant material for doubling the width of the North bufferyard, South bufferyard along Hwy. 1709, East bufferyard and West bufferyard. This reduction of required amounts of plant material is allowable as it corresponds to Illustration "A" of Section 42 Bufferyards of the Zoning Ordinance. BUILDING INSPECTIONS gb-5 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case: 00-047 Date of Review: 5 —30 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 3, Block 1 (Site Plan— Southlake DPS West Facility) OWNER: PREPARED BY: City of Southlake Raymond L. Goodson. Jr. Inc. 667 N. Carroll Ave. 5445 La Sierra, Suite 300 L.B. 17 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231-4138 Phone: (817) 481-5581 Phone: (817) 739-8100 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant submitted a good Tree Survey that meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. The southern access drive from Randol Mill Ave. shows to remove eighteen (18) existing trees. Out of the total 18 trees, six (6) are dead and four (4) are protected species according to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; and eight (8) are marginal or not protected. Only one (1) of the marginal trees, a Green Ash, is considerable of preserving. The others are declining or in a hazardous state. 3. To better preserve the trees within the area of the North bufferyard, the proposed retention wall could be moved to the North side of the trees where it would not be necessary to make any grade changes between the retention wall and the North parking spaces and access drive. The wall should be constructed on the far North side of the bufferyard. 4. Out of the total 125 existing trees on the site, 40 would need to be removed for the proposed construction; leaving 85 remaining on the site. I noticed only two trees on the site that could possibly be transplanted and moved to another site. They were a 6" Cedar Elm and a 4" Pecan. The Cedar Elm is designated by the #78 on the Landscape Plan and the Pecan is not identified on the plans. 5. Although Lot 2R, Block 1 is not a part of the proposed plan, the design of the site removes the best trees on the site. Of course the trees in the middle of the lot could not be saved because they BUILDING INSPECTIONS City of Southiake, Texas would be in the middle of a building. But, if the parking lot area was redesigned and grade changes kept minimal more of the specimen trees could be preserved. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this site. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Informational comments = * Observational comments= # BUILDING INSPECTIONS 1 I 1 I I BONS PAWAO OPEN SPACE B , 1 ✓N DRAINAGE MEADOW w•NAl..) SL7/LOIZ51(YS DELI ! - j 1 YIERS 4EAOOW PHASE N .w"Or _• eAAr 'O' , <or, « ....,„, — i I. 6 a°w6s OK"LwM s ft. rw:mr w 7 w°'"<,a$ ..,N.:. .,,,,,,f a� �iawnav I • I is M1OB-mum weNwRa 'W Rv. o-°▪wron`/ N' 9 t 1 m w,� � """�!'Aj.e> >w>6+NN1" 9; 4�_- -' +y f?I~ '1 RI •� t `,`o, `y: Nw rr I / I t NaA"'ww6L w w E isc �1 +-.,ul� ,\ $ ..d4s`°` / .it ,.t •. • r 1 - a lei^ - - w'I „i°,>,�"w""w .s '' e � / e PEC.AxeOT, �;;L'LN 'i�e a _ '�+' �,B...w �" >•.r6�r�." rf�Il MAP ala SANS n SAKE AOOITNW I "ii Ind-=5 f —�— ,.;��` Q1� T�j� �''-, `A, AT v 6sa.w .4a�.• �`A. rt.B- mEP lOI RNLI r r...11 --i' c �;� 1,•off f 4, " Wwand.. � \` /� �.0cEGEIVD.o. �' Pm6•.s o>�scwR twc Atiff \\ 1 a•w`pA� •IIII \ ,�p.� PRO•. SERFP,,>.F - II - , 1 ` i C\\ LOT 4 BLOCK I ,, 1 A�'�rAA/I PROP w,eR(ur I • 1 I 1 ; Y � n,o-Ae mr+w, / :/" O„ PROP.WGANO ur✓rlwc nv,uR(:. 1. I i I I wr /ul(�'N[ 1 I 1 i _m e' �' d //J wM OES(GVADcw> FII 11 .A.r�e a )N4/N/N '1 1 'dl \ !-STQVYD/NC /••IF' �>A sil�jP':- <5'17 t� /�/ / evrrnvwos p III �9 IR4 Tr G// / /� k t 1 a1 7/,573 sF a�• °/ @ t I �CI I ' ih,,,, > / {(a a ( \ ,>Jc. \ // �G3 nar cwr . • r ....:- !I i a,a 1 ill 1 ','gy,�p( , , ,.•w..ml llp'i � 1' A°v �.uNa >NL' § 4 1 �� 4 '� `7�` " 1'/ ?t. 6 • Ak �Y .AL r: --r • J § 'w.-a - "r y �`�, 9. ,- .,•str Y >y. -, (r ,p +.ir e.,.. e' /,/ ® w�! o a. It C� + ,,:: .; Ip " C n' fit" -�/9 �:' / SOU(/ANEWCROS. C -a - 4U I I $d 3y R; t IN r5 ! .Y91V. . / PHASE Y ^V F 1C •l 1a BIT'" �+0. a8,.f : 1,A.>`r , No urrser SWAG(s eEnw PLANNED 'It 1 '_ ; N rtW .[nm/rn•wNJ 2 <(NIMi6 SNAIL GOIr[Y WM MINIM WOMAN NO e/F! �1 I ,YTI .ZTZ pi.. r• 97F DATA SUMMARY DRAKE APOYR(AY ' J '� '` )" 6 \x� \ u '/ :. //,. Lora Lois � PAX LOT .c« I 1 1 Y \ / \! 1' ' ' \ SPEo`xA INN CONCEPT PLAN SITE PLAN Y ,z✓a wJr/pro..mn� I ! j' .,F' I' r.:. `74It,s/A ^ .//�'/ .F" EAR rrscCTONOo rauwc c-z r Ac s a a AO cs uses( rzo ro OQ A>wo 6A p i a�• - 1r f.q'�%b�N}C.�, fs' e6iNr'�-1Pe� f✓ ,s�oc6 r u�ro uxo oeveNAreN aeas.r.s>rvAt Rear INI Na(>. — I' 't\• t. / J ./ SONENIAKE CROSSING 1 e III . r� t�� � ��AN, • sA .- 1 I pp 7FXAC0 GAS SCABOY / ' h,/ v 4 .A>�r ' ��s rn6>.1. I 01•Wall> /%/ /[8�(t��P Aao-ar,..wA+oa/ AV ACREAGE JtSpJ Sr ,TdI/]sr _ L. a+`awA rm,Nw 1^';i:•. ,vC4 5'�P' j- \ .n,•.. 41 „+ ,f'" 9>f cOHNAfE NI 21.1 J Sr/,21i, wA>'I..Xa54 Sr_ ,6✓.it �e i NN.R�`erwa ,II �,;c/ A z -- h�';G // +I�I .Q� J4,PF. 5� t1. .. .•:� AKA O'OPLN SPAGl N N2se,SF/I✓i. WM•T.F.6aZ0>Y/AiNi ° �� fi ,^' �yA e` l SWAM AHA: rop Kf£RCO CC lZCCO awn asrov 1 .a;t yy, b I (Y�.OP, ,�" "y 17 / , \ L r>SF KrAS MICRON.JSin!Sr NARK/Sf16°(H>F'TANS.� _ I 2i /yY�SIX/(BRAKE CROSSING TOM ROOC AKA NA 21577 SF. wIN•l.F.fl4 J Sr .t 0 AL ,GM 21,31-,O 18 AOLVOOV - /" PHASE R PANOWL REPAaV: 11 SPACES 50 SPACES M.A.PAte .../ I ' • / r 60!:' - ._.�J ' da.s.r PARKING r 6co_x Yrwvor, WOWED. 15 BLS "10.,PACES I // r ▪ _ A,et'ae,s FROPOScoiwLO(ors l for (cor ) / MAIM.,GO.ERAGE Nor ro Ex«EO 70X 62Nr 5,/AIX WM',F.104605 Sr/BIN t- / y / or a BLO0(1 SWYMY MART-w1E IAIDSCME uww.wv[ a.w.nw>w w •1.l..,wa.cTAC6>h - \`�J A �. bn°` nN.o w. �of SITE PLAN '� /� 1 1 A' ~/'` ea. ....ra if la tCCCCCCCCJSCCC wv4.1• OF ,�,yr.sr '�_ ` Enid r.,,!�> 1 2006. SHUNAIL CORPORATION,INC. I � '.B•i .•••ter .N.ewr•! ..•n •w.�rw• >•�`i. 'wr`(w>i'�',L� arm ^••••w�• (/- LOr 1K BLOCK r A G ALA Aa IB A00(RCW rr�� {i�i P>\ • o,1R 6rcar, "'"- _ a-• J,.�q LOT 0R.SUMMARY CHART-iREAYNgS �>-I cm GSB No.YA00-o18 IL• ♦ SCUINLANE CROSSING ^'••• > +�>a OP TIM R..R .a,.0 / PHASE I *.• 2....� u .,,,,, .:fir "�,,,..,v.... CORNER ADDITION •TN••• ...w '✓ 6"• > II.R.FAKES SURVEY,ABSTRACT No.500 Y AV.e> � : I 'Al ,:+` / rtw NrrO e_firrut xu.) v • SJ •n. uP- •w..r rw Y- > CITY OF SOUTNLAXE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS �• 12.11. w.r- Y+ Z OD/eR' ENGINEER. F SOUTHLAND OND L >A I •r•/• �.N...._..•...•_. �V-• w �• �•'� n rr•'i -n x • i> ts's NOO GMM IvdNV6 RA6yu SYRRRAOODSON.✓R..INC . F. //{• '/ \ ,,,,r�,,.�„`„ BBurxcA.a.rA T•o•: suirt tuo cerT / STA/LlhC,AZ'E 0OPASS7N4 ` (ll.l MI-bye, dALLA?.TX 6321_Ar1N (: ) SB-e3BB 0...m^"'• e..�...,1. c1r.)n6-sas.(PAX) i i aN[.r.n DAM NME I.2000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-344 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 3, W. R. EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2833, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2, W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500; AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.822 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 1 81341 • authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 2 Qg 10 schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 3 7 6,I I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 4 7 6 I accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 5 21.13 • comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" A portion of Lot 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 0.822 acres LOT 2R, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION Being a tract or parcel of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of that tract of land conveyed to Robert G. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 3976, Page 12, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and part of Lot 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Brittain & Crawford" found for corner in the northwesterly line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) (a 130 foot right-of-way), said rod being the southerly common corner between Lot 1, Block 1, corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and said Brown tract; THENCE North 15°48'53" West, along the common line between said Lot 1 and said Brown tract, a distance of 207.80 feet to a chisel mark found for corner, said chisel mark being the easterly common corner of Lots 1 and 2 of said Corner Addition; THENCE North 51°04'37' East, a distance of 146.72 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG" set for corner; THENCE South 39°05'10' East, a distance of 190.47 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RLG" set for corner in the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard; THENCE South 50°54'50" West, along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 228.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 35,813 square feet or 0.82 acres of land, more or less. N.\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-344.DOC Page 8 �13 IJW • • z • 0,1 n .off 3 z ( ,, I LO..,,,,r,,,• �� ,mom (Tj7 ,' MAR=SAUCERS N,ERroft S ;}r,MGY/ ;w ..awl, M.: A �.f .WRg1W nCW l ce 1M_.r'._ J�T� ki 3 ', :r•',,... w XIS N µID' .,aamlB�n 'x'��'•rG� \� •s �d°� ! r grlC, . p H 'yy�rJ'�`��1�: ..�"r.iK•' ,4r �Q>� "- � .pr. is• +�, ,, r• le 2 some UV y M1W bR-u -1 I1 •-[ryn[yf'l''r" 11♦ �. m.is N'ti�'. , MOP SIMI WWII tire `ill @ s�YpH ' w 1\. wW. ,a�.1 / epr', o M"`�R Ra, m I ' ;I I ,117.fe if IN ry &, fr, ."is. A 7-s7�av✓�rleaMc `A. ram,^✓ r•`'.'. l/r/O///%� I I 1 r. ` 27,57J SF. ` A / ,e / d_ I �I I i9 {I� I' -e-- _ :, A Y N2 A• 'E hr.rc v-• ,\fir a"/i'A, 11/ r I ,�•41 • .. z' I L i 1 T ii 1 2_a- !� y Y.e'• ,.b0.�/ / =7L r, i_ a fff , pi 1 R r. r, r •►, , t_ i__ I ) 1 4 I� f ✓ _: Gp7 I n'� J — t. / / R C I .. - f'x. , y'¢l, F y �, / xvi -,-- r r 1.I.1 j 111 �1 ,� _ SPOV'. ._, `,T•M/y/ , .emu WRAY uM VOW CO IOW RAN. \iJ el I.I u am r, J ooevIX+q Iaf. �-1 y xI b !i ,� M .r az a. 11 e . s r OATH x.�aw✓ 9 1 �) a�rlN°,'i�n'RDov I ! 11 ` 'v+ p / .r Id LAM t�anew. ,. y`W°Ta'.ur M1W a'�w.`m..oaT I I 1' l�. �: YI� 0/\.fie f�-' ,p�Q / r s a«n r mayor aawc nwx iva MT r m F-7 !O wnK oaa.nit /211.COKA1'Nt J � O''" 11' JVDIr.ARr a%svc _ 1 ri V I nxAm CAS srAnav t ,,% 9 r^ r� r_, rr D om n., ..,. f.. .1.11f IN1✓ 4� QP / SW WWMi M ,lL..,.I r/ISM.NM 7,n�s/N.Xi = e`I i !U , .r..�Manv 1 /.•Ia^* '`11c9d / 33CV .w . / .'I. 11, nMCA v DX/to¢ r/ur M•r ra ,r/a1Wi 10 / /"ititAV:Ai/P.�/,":flr 7 / /S ESP*AREA my Harr r new,/rms apt ( / \ G rxraDero.,21W .N r l n`, "///AYE/ 1. / LAM us 5rr MO.(MOO r .tat/zrrnas,+aev r CII I f��• /%,{fy^./ r mG[/t[Ot,N" .0 Sd))Jr .M'IJ nMir! 1 a Atu MC lls.mDw I E Ili// ://,4A//y/y / ixXst°'i l+w.c Rca.eu .nrm mr,�as �.cr~ I / t>d M1u.-�wraa> 1 1 1 �' .mrtJ fs.nr J H OWIYA Ff rm. Y r1o6 �� / OM�J ..es an�orosm WI ILO, rfor ) / ..rR.asaaN�u lr WIm[m: SUN rl.A .M'rf R.IM r/Skit / J .or a allot 1"XXX COAX-MOWN I..xplOme .,s+a r..wnn r.. 'tI-w �y� f' r' r / --�:; .7-r sirs PLAN or J I 1 • / . m �aTA l�ni a M "�$ �1 '^ `' r°r t scocr I 4 r (Pry �. '� ':r oHcsr�JUN 0 1 Z0061 IDT 1 aOM 1 -YIDr-MM �` y .RUM CariVellICK SIC I ),t.. r,_, ='. `�'w'Y`..�{.r I� LOT CITY can Mkt 1 1 6 048 �In tNu Ammar �'�' ~- _ •~ n y for A LAY.oW^_MfRM03 �, OF �H...W ��^� �'t i aag°P%9"C L- 4",., C y 1e — ti '''r-':.�R CORNS;ADDITION �� ;� y,- N ' n ITR.SASS Ag5.r,ARSTR.CT Na 500 4'i "'•1 a n.... r -IMO 0-2 u a n • �. Rt.• „ " CtT/Of SDIRIlL1A'.UMW?GDURTI:KXAS ��• r, 1. I .!�'��, ..~ ..- . L=•. i e.N.R .� , rRalrrrR 8 .�-e MT Form menu M1aoMD L CODDSON JR..1RC. SOLTRIMS / '• nor r•W+_ r.r•...r.r� OM Mr-lNr Tom. SUM 2uin.rr-.rn / fy, A<Soar I L (.r.l>n S[TnitMi 011aS91i\ r�-r a.�. a • 1j W.,r!--.aa.(iu) gin.MO DIM NM r.11000 A.. City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-049 PROJECT: Plat Revision - Lots 2R& 3, Block 1, Corner Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of proposed Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lots 2 and 3, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tract 2, W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500; and being approximately 4.8767 acres. PURPOSE: Platting to combine platted and unplatted property for proposed development. LOCATION: On the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709) approximately 300' east of Randol Mill. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District PROPOSED ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses limited to a public safety facility and to include any associated outside storage. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, June 2, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated June 2, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-049PR.doc 'A Tract Map ZAOO-049 FLOR-► k; 0-f r�.v , wpwo Am Min 11— Amm��u■• �Egn 1*,�. ���4���:u�?a�n,yj ( ::v a j //►ova��44.10 �� r•�4.i4• i r,'164 gqi, 111r� S r.ME I 1 I I I .II�II iista��t III'�t ial VA t��R�'� 'r�G��,r:..�1 ��`0 �Illlf iii��•ASimo ` ��414 �0 fit• ,1 Mv1 ft mil wpm ■ lamas"■ 11 E:�;r■ ��„loss�`v id MI►I■III►�ii% :C.. ■Mu:Si,. Imo■"".T�- �•��z •`!� �:'i d ._ FINN_ A tir �r_1..111■. : I II ill ii�-- ■ram:♦1 re INO 4) iD j y� ST!R OM la Illy r��& . �s lear „ . .. ....- In: is trnr,F,7117 IF mum r.PRIWair libmeri= A All LI verse.tairt ��.- Mairillirill 1 I. 4pAlEi 111F:; Meg°115 Oidt‘k. BIM IMMINSWOOVAA W• PPR - i■■d!a ra B A P 1�as y��� t.•,�• 1 IIM II ' v., ■1�■■■Ia MN.HAS ► i �►�i I.I SOP .• 010/11.I I. limmonnaL r.■■■761221i iii NM 741.1 moat MEW -go ll I .. 41'Elm �!■■■ I ����ri ! . ■%h j�ti IH _ !,a 2000 0 2000 Feet mimmimmi - _? N Aim. / �W E S SC-2 . a Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-049 so •Ai i p : l •, el �� _ �� �� J .„, ' .Pr 7� a IINIX ,,--'' \ 15 5�' v Ow 14 4 6 5 7 1 - 4 Pk$41 ____ r,, I •II____,iltildli 11 i - )` t' I.17'2 alill-- : .17111 Z Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. H. Saunders 1. "AG" 1. Retail Commercial 1. 1.00 acres 2. Myers Meadow Homeowners Assn. 2. "R-PUD" 2. Medium Density Residential 2. 4.18 acres 3. Schlotzsky's Real Estate Inc. 3. "C-2" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.83 acres 4. Ludwig Partners,Ltd. 4. "C-3" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 1.02 acres 5. Venus Partners IV, LP 5. "C-3" 5. Retail commercial 5. 2.44 acres 6. Southlake JV 6. "C-3" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 0.86 acres 7. Southlake JV 7. "C-3" 7. Retail Commercial 7. 9.20 acres 8. McDonald's Corp. 8. "C-3" 8. Retail Commercial 8. 1.06 acres 9. Albertson's Inc. 9. "C-3" 9. Retail Commercial 9. 5.55 acres 10. M&H Food Mart 10. "C-2" 10. Retail Commercial 10. 1.02 acres 11. Shunail Corp Inc. 11."C-3" 11. Retail Commercial 11. 1.08 acres 12.J. Martin 12. "C-3" 12. Retail Commercial 12. 3.21 acres 13.D. Brown 13. "SF-1A" 13. Office Commercial 13. 3.25 acres 14.D.Collins 14. "SF-1A" 14. Low Density Residential 14. 3.19 acres 15.D.Campbell 15. "SF-1A" 15. Low Density Residential 15. 3.29 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-049.doc Pc-3 / • • N..vw LILTS•..a..r, 1. • Tame. M th•City a Imam.,mutate m VI CIN ITT MAP u w .a r...... r• irr �t••'rr'�' N . ar ••earl 4!a W rr�• Or•eil moat ~ i .i r▪...•w.r•...ar..r«...1.•wr.r.M.fr. .na• Ma.••r W r•t aat.°M.•u j N ... •Mr...... • e,a.x Ma..r ...t a•.urn smut nu u N T9B.I�,T ..., 9' �` .e r.tuw.MOM'�>�e. •r S.w.sf.......mat a••.•r., • rj %'"'s: ...Sr a.•11..•tut•••wa..La......a W.Oa..0 a am P o.r• e.r,...axt�„ — IL--` J rMaMmed«.....lMal. .....MINI .r.un w M le ale ml Ma•.•'•.;'w'w•+rAMAS ammo , a. t01 • n•..•.•.a . . .. NYwI nC••a me M Mehl, aa;.aU+ ▪ of aa de �, w..r �� -9- n"°';.w t�`:t..::�.r. ...a...r,'u.ttt«.alf nl.r a.'Nawwl4s 5.3 [jy. Shaft OF ISSAS . J S LOT 2 COMM.Oom TM 1 unI fa Nr••"M Mom t°easl••;N • . •h Ma..r N.N v� • .eN•N t•aN creel•Meted.. •••pN• •N eaNM• to me mat na •. Or •.••[ v • �� ��� L i l AYl 1w. R. T• 0 J Igt `®ram w� .l c•�•a•li. a7-/a�T��-• Q I wwa.a•ccc.race's. �`e�.�, [ '• l�= J nt•t.to Vttt,tr a ate*sue w, /� e• LOT r ` I ' •I °'r aura :1 • reN.a;['t; erw..a Ya[W; ••`II•lo;atM•ee a.•eN W�te;� R. -• '¢ «G BLOCK I r ..... tt `l : .,.• a a. -r o •.r cart ��r LOT Ista It ry 1 //5 .Y,` A etSw a Tom out um Noma.o. )fart mite M ••t•. • E S• I rr 91 i,,M•F.L. �j Y.i . • ay M AM 0= •I IVVV� .I�'S9O1• \ '`f •n.▪ �.°.• .a4 a .a COw[.r..e me.Nte e. `-' O a I P' om• 40.�JC .w•a...r. `• r...a. .e.M.Sal�ala•ev...u..e,my a,are;anaa.md T.'.~eta'o<rt.,.r"[;:,•IWaltae�ul r Fii' DO401 L" I. U_ nty edEAec AtifteP*1- 9{yt 3 Z. wt't • • r / ar..w,r..ax `"e`aa' e N.`a"a'°• FINAL PLAT (2.136AC TWO LOTS' 1 ,• � o °"'°"'"" LOTS I a 2N BLOCK I CORNER ADDN. ; B PART OF W R EAVES SURVEY.ABSTRACT NO.500 •a S O � CITY OF SOUTRU«E,TAAtANT COUNTY,TEXAS y t' By . • t; A LAWS■OtITWW[R 4I111VSYDIC,INC.PO Om LeM44 • non AT[Res e a c.R«aar A .stave.941 .Ma.Jf{2✓1L . ""'t,1•t1 f • • "MO./s'>,.X// Z")-9)/,-1V f FILE RP-421 5101-C 21 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAT • /• . // wrau TNMCERs . 2 ,s4 / i 40/;;;A: . /Ay� / G�.7C. • // •�=i / err N . Ib ) • . ,-.,: .r.•+N•s••wnT� HEMS MOM r,ttY MN, , 'Autry µ x 4Y ceiMiR,m a COMM A.suoE x,N,rw.r.c.r. c voc r u-,aer f Mrs /c. sE,a[N,,r.Ru.r./ wpm j / I // • / / / ..,, ...„. % / MRL)9Te.P4 ].BRTCT ,/ \toP 'r. 4 L0 . .. �/ TLOT a.aw pwr / •y� 1 LOT # .3 % / / C.M.SUM.B1. TCT (NJM R2 IT.) • / / // k .. .r•.1.r•E, / j/ //�./ / . (..003 S0 R.1 Z WAS✓.,Ow PM•SE OW . { / • uwrET w SOK 172 / 7. LOT i /A7-2 VOW a R •..c r. / ; (sE.see n n) ..... �/ .<..1oe.. /1 �....®- --- -_. .—rem----------F—" .,rr.M .ao.a,------- --- --- F • I (r --- --r r1r... — / f r' --- -- �. .... [ 5 SI•Ir'10' ■-us.3e' a POOR Of . - W WEST SOUTH (E BOULEVARD(F.M. 1709) —1_. - - - �/ SOOTM.•EP —_ -- • VOW.Tell. .0 Ti,,.OR T.CT /—/—__..._ _-_.—_.__ OM,ORE.. REMr LOT S.'LOCO 1 T - v MINT.o. -- ...ED,SOOewvn C :PM.SE n0 // LOT R. etm 1 AT 6. BLOCK! AT T, B O R 1MU IV,AMOK 10`'' BEOLM' LOT 1, 2 AND 3, W.R._EAVES No. 500 ADDITION / LOT]R LOt a SOOTw.RE CROSS1Mc.PHASE[ % c.BP,ET A S.%if., OTC.,. HAN• `/ 500 ,,.4 T" E CROSSING.P w SE I IONS. 3.351 ACRE TRACT GMICT A.USX 1611 PR.lCT. • , m�r•.�r [N COWTNE.Li.Of SOUNLAKE MOO.AN. smarm 1 nu �..".....,-. OT is NSW ON Ilil 9'•R. .500 1.1r,. .......�..... ,w....r..m.,N,aT TO MONO.,.,M,FLOP OUTDO. 1,•,n„e„PP,•1.N.r••••., .rt1[ .. "[.. a �a-• rr.rr ,B, FIST T EAVES SURVEY ABSTRACT,p NO APPN0080 MY THe PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION "" •'•. —•w,:-,:i.•«•.� ...6', 'ri1' r1. u,�/�r� w�u ,•w, l fie"[�.r me n,[. L1 :"'S.'s �.. �� .. _ Ateamoo.*AIM pees/seer i r► r.gi Pilo NU NIA.sum IN l,n,...,,,,•.•i.,.rr,a-Can Ne.L PS-70.. O1,1.r: ONO"TOT AA OA r..,,1�r... �.rr.....u...1i. r«::�«r.`..... o... w. « ..«ti�.,...w„ .,.,«..r.. WA.,rt,MAO •i scI[leMv •� ... ...1 e. w.�..,�r rr"S..w....1 1.• ' ..+ . 10,M - we..1.i...,...r.i:::•E�... r., • r• ..w..,............. MA/AMA APPROYeO BY 77Q CRT COUNCIL •_•_ '•_•••ti., ••«•. ..«�.....-.r .�•...:.1.. __ :�/' pi,.r ,u~it u.i. al . s...•w w,a WV�kraKR.-d..t>rr�/r— �_��JryE��r—E� _ :. ... _ .�� .�.� .. �r_r.. ONE r •r ..,o.„ ra.. Awy [�,.mn.... /l,' rn!1>•/1.17 Or F ._ .:......•.....,.c,..... ..,t. ...«. in,1.w arms•..�sp�,�...r.`. r_...'� R.me WIN DAY/D C. /,q4K _ _ �""irm_r �r� Surveyors, Inc, ..�.�M1,r..r.•1 r... id a MT EMT OM SO �" _' .'ram' ..sue - t.sE. fir.,_ �a y y • I 1110.191.1•11Al "71 ��i '.,.'°M. t_+ ,. ...teL ,.,«,..,." : .,: F��— ..A00 LOOM 11T1.— r,r".Y-MT 7E•N ' 4.'� r'•'.....1. w.r....w.a•. ..,.r.. .r.1iT,x«r."« Iui i. :�5--1..i-T.::. � ,Ti a-a-.F PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAT City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 4111 Case No.: ZA00-049 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 6/02/00 Project Name: Plat Revision -Lots 2R and 3, Block 1, Corner Addition,being a revision of Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, being 4.8767 acres out of the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No 500 APPLICANT: Surveyor: City of Southlake .Raymond L. Goodson, Jr. Inc. 667 North Carroll Avenue 5445 La Sierra, Suite 300 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: 817-481-5581 X730 Phone: 214-739-8100 Fax: 817-481-0036 Attn: Garland Wilson Fax: 214-739-6354 Attn: Jerry Fang CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. 4 1. Correct the discrepancy between the called monument in first call from beginning of the metes and bounds description and graphic label. 2. Provide dimensions from perimeter boundary corners to the opposite side of the right-of-way and to • the existing centerline of the roadway. Label "Existing Roadway Centerline". Also provide interior lot dimensions for the north and south lot boundary of Lot 3 adjacent to Randol Mill Avenue. 3. Plat approval is subject to appropriate change of zoning on the property. * Upon review of final construction plans, additional easements for utilities and/or drainage may be required prior to filing. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: PSA- John Main VIA FAX M N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-099PR3.DOC Page 1 L GRAPIlIC SCALE OMNERC OPOICADMV sr„F�eons G Ty rANFA~T , l— I o ST 1 -- --- An., a,A CF,A v lb.C.;f SIbmbIb a r Me en or o m l IR N n< w . �; aWof ouM., arrant Coanty Ma.Me reword.M:era ., Eam .. A a t Zr Q / oonff.! f Loe°�N2 of Mock°ipm Palmas tP eo the cy rdwl0.waroC.,i 9..y r,J,,rr/a.Mh'Am �*•j#� lee A eau.rc ''<. e u.. >.- Cane r Na.500 Aaar,a,,w oMlma to Mr C a roe 6 Ney� MN.Cum.t e it<.<Pwl uF MO tl .... am ,r... - irgy r. `` •°` 4r- / - ra'...°N , ":,a x M ea r Y o,sv,Ma� wd Revor.Wwl ,. y y al•,< , �r +� NeN JY,7•[ rr� wnw eA w,'�~ ;• ,� Nit,n /�i� LWON.wnG of common eo Ewan for ,.tM ar said raw.lw. a Comer Addition and ame Bt.Ina <owew+°Co IJO foot natt°<- . )g7+:. n „. k r.e� ""'\�\\2k. _� /,,�f ./ l rs'+nsaDen.Me easterly m r corneron e/ton r me a..r erCorner said Lor I one n. ;e moon I,o,r m-a m;rN a soyea tool to o.now mar,m�.,e/a<.,.,..,�,ne tens.•mn.. MS p .mm,...,f, _ _ _ > ,pee-y• �M\ �'1 -41` `. )t� /. lbf)DIDIC Saab SrWJY IM f awn o Mr.mo Ihe comm.lam de said ol,I ur.e P/a o Ms..for IA562 feat er sad c m mare of ere Mr err,Ron.NW (a q'ar ' .` ...n . `' k •F, ,f'.,., vocable M. r of-.y) food ems saute 5550.0•East o nit o e of DJ . ,e line taut comm.comer _ �� nnn a u r"m r e .7sm.rm ,as msy& LOT J '��:. „n mervCF f 0004.0Y Eosl Nnv tee oars 1...of.ae Pa.MP None Mr a uMlowe of Mr as feel f one pose.a•.st�nA Drat n w Cameo.'loon°b yµj_e +�7 'GROSS 176,614 SO.FT(s.01 ) i rn.<s /am <,c Ewen., roe eeiy:r fee room r e of a rro.l of road conveyed wR`a' �� �m�i r NET I71,B12 SLl FT.(4.01 ACf � ,\ yea ra naraa Saunders by e..a r.awwa x Y am 1a�2 Page<aa Facade.fa+mr Cwnrx/esar. 4 I . .,,,,;i y'!'" /.`�o r.r+cE Novae na<ror Ea,l era y�r ,ma y or.",�o,corner solo..',err lot z one rat z3 feet P sae.tee ya,lr cap,lanaee arnra:,r Crawford'noose d 33 .r/��y -. rr..x s a a. L,o..f a'ar Pon.,sae roe be.rn. :m Mom.I ti r E,aIv. I rr� Y I �6▪ .J \-// .4 / �� '• /T uTY'Fo,r cr.r..,az,M. ro M k l;c cyo A:4eK .1 / \ �ypy:mm �,a✓I'"S ✓iS �.. ..n. ,;!F Y o..-net°Nwraw o�m.q'.aoY•I r ar.,eer...,.nab,a.•.e..rra.r e„e ul..,Y.aoa.v,•as.r on wen;,�raoo tn.clr of swnow. V Sy3 iiu„rv< ///J', /o t"..:r ..ri% ,w:l eam., Came(of N.zroa vat Pe...Tarrant Cann .nano m)'`'1 �m � •''l/Yy B y .\ \� Y ���i / •C / /rKKE NwM.Y 69 feet ro a rod me 0..oho omaw Neon 5.r bee. -- O r k-,y eT —�•P `ems �! -:,----./,y� / i \ M ne or sso rod hang e no•the ry e ma,career ael.<er•tar,I and z of,a".N.Cams foe 500 A.hon, ,t`�* �.\_ ,I '" ,.r : /' MEND(Tooth.0..5•East of r common oerve.,aN roe emn9 . Mr r undo'I. bet a.2.Wm with....p.a.'sm sra'ww V.P.err for J• 0" /���aur rn•,.aec comm a'Inv nortnnesterfy,I.. said SwNnaYe fe wed rmi Co. a 1,. .star Ip — � ,.:I 5� ..„,,, ,,. /" e `i': 9i/ .,., ww.4., " n10;e`NEAtrcwFosl'so�e AWN BY-.r,wM�, y e of ran Soots and:nor a a , e 6 Met to M el ' p d . „aw ��//�,' ✓; .1� OM' % i n Soo...Bw;e..a°m oy oe Net .tNNrv,O-ecorvNWe and ca...zu.Izy,vane b ,.W w ... ' • a/f,5y r LOT ZR `1 4 Xo-w,•"-qd Ali c. or a-e o' ' l' .xSB(OIJ� SR FT. 11 ;/ .10• /fcw uc 4wf4a a`�mv�rc NOW., KNOW ALL rue !n<sF C5. by ov. �.ro .m..145 nY;` 1e,,.`i8.1 AC.) l` •d ✓/ aeccr its Enos„ os tat fo oo Loy.xa,e I.Comer ro,l A»eor.e ear a S nmma', r ee 1,...and ow w �Ix f e me M nn y one was... !F. ".! ♦. �• ' � 'y' I.pub.'s v t M.anal avc f 1'v desam. orhaupr wxno w fAM 7 2 1� � ��"",'�¢-IV.- / '''10..}'• r f' l.7 r .s n,M'3 y hand at 5...t.fan.Came roar this--- y - -jo. , A.4r i I ,� - x d d 8L19,', / S.a.e.:.. •"�;r� 'Tg zs„31';'Td/v�� / c ,... nnc� m --- --------- A•!''ems ..`` r w fRn.n � Xt y. V�// � e..<,4:b N.t4c qr PpNr a c / LTA1E a 1rxnAs 7�/ "- awn a RRArr, I • I mom.to ma to.Me morson whom i At:',,,, aa., ,n ,' / name 0 we�`e e`l s°M".lee a,a n, .n'aan °;x4ed ro a mot he/she...at:m;.,Gar.,:Y,2.- kr�',',o re 1 I 1 �- / •••:• ...OM Me.Erases ore o=M.a of,one y f"t-oaiWaYe. `+ 4 ro / /'��Sr /nt I GKN U/A[AYr NANO AND StM.u,MN_— y I— e ran me r,amnsW we cros,Nvlmn ayverrw..w n M. MI, *LVOMML '►.� its 'RPL e id�'♦ /crMAs ,. ";;v i ma i �' ✓ /' u,ar --..4T Ayommr,rm A.A.,.- "/ / y nMaait eeN�Or Tar •114•- J.a A ,m /;"' / xe rn.:na lea�aac loan ea.am.nrr e•onave no,........ o r. ,l the re�•Ylo.e"w�rycae:,.r.vae�Daerr.e,d cm.,ee W.Abject., tn. ,.f M<n Fa�aer } /. \/,\ o/i f cowry.boos. ...Au,. AI /• any ''' ' d ; ��M'� 'J r,ru lavat,k./Gos /n-Cwnfy Ebcvi cai<fa0;.a.me 31 /J..;/ a �V//' o ,,f' , ,s Don m' f.. Na'"--- ---_ ah red......--------- I Dare: / .. i x°r�� ms;. .r w a mx o e a ems rob aI b<oa w q porrw m e2 Contra.we Southwest Bee/w.ml•w 1 i hlc V i' �/ te/ a r.r 4,44'ry marked on Its a a.leaf Pus °rom.',MSC,,I OW surrey a b.w onr.rw u� y ..elrSWm rren. rinrN No-n AL.•N--____--_ 1 2000 •:;.Aa n m m Printed N r, ,ru Srof• tRa�A OR[.i No.lfli- Clie nrb: New. _—___ , o e Y1. .�,n r.eeer Dare:__._.... ArT or AIS LI V '4 ern`' �w, C` , OF TAPPAN) ) Choler Cammnsrrm, PIA %VISION I he '!' OM.SIC M an M„ear rann ,a c N T •°"°` LOT 2R AND LOT 3, BLOCK > 07.74....Z..e° °'fix x, b :a a,�o°°�a. mewledM, o.for Me purposed dNw. --- CORNER ADDITION 1 MM.n OVEN CWCCF MY HMO AM 5.1 w Mn_apy of_—____—_.:000 nlb: AA ADDITION TO TR,CITY OP SOUTHIA66.TARRINT COUNTY.TL'6AS ^• _ _____------ Ovre_ TN NG a R6RSLOY OP LOT Z.BLOCS I DONNAS.ADDITION ACCVAOrNC TO NM, y Po�c 6 PLAT R6roRD.IN CABINET A 6 A6, PLAT RECV.S T.RANT COUNTT,TCUS,AND A6R6FTS1ON OP r-� My commission TO MID P9,N 61.5oSOR S,GAB AB CT s a°e00.0f ON ACCORDING Z t RY P� AWAS.ND AC...4 I I PUT A$ +�D n AMNOI[D BY AT CITY C10f/NOY OP LWR D INININ TUS With TPIPES SCAM-CONTAINING No.500 ALL R NC 5 L.A. AiVROYED By 1NF PLAN..et AWING CONWssibl S, e�rF' klAYr- W2: ABM?ACRef'IN SOUTRLA. ,TRW COUNTY•MCA_S r li Eons' �T , ary afcwP —__ plAYevAN —_--- — CITE ass o.TA .N-,bract,.,a oar. R k Mor.tor es a �yo I<ilnT re;,oeerfim a motes a _-------_ RAYNOND L.COOCSON.JA..INC$ •� r of stale bit and city mMmrs and:s M.....O.0/MOIL SECATTARH_____._—._ e R Dawn.to A.er and of s 9 ..deity are Mredby away. r CITY OF SOOTNGAc s a a m,..=.r 4e.. PICIN1fY N,., •n r PILAW IN CABINITT •SLeo6___._DATE__.—__. City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-064 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-345—First Reading - Rezoning and Site Plan - Bicentennial Park STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Site Plan on property legally described as Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres. PURPOSE: Site Plan approval required with rezoning to address new outside storage requirements and new lighting on Bicentennial Park. LOCATION: On the north side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) generally in between Shady Oaks Drive and North White Chapel Boulevard. OWNER: City of Southlake APPLICANT: Cheatham and Associates CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage LAND USE CATEGORY: Public Parks/Open Space NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirty-five (35) RESPONSES: Five (5) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • James K. Zitnik, 340 Green Oaks Ln, Southlake, TX undecided, "This explanation is unclear." (Received May 31, 2000.) • Sarif Reaz, 900 San Saba Drive, Southlake, TX in favor, "I am Sharif Reaz in favor of request for the following property for retail commercial." (Received May 31, 2000.) • Christine Mediate, 220 Green Oaks Lane, Southlake, TX opposed, "What is the plan for usage of this lot?" (Received June 5, 2000.) • V. Stanton Mediate, 220 Green Oaks Lane, Southlake, TX opposed, "What is plan for this lot?" (Received June 5, 2000.) SO-1 City of Southlake, Texas • Robert Harvey, 901 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, TX, opposed, "We are opposed until it is better explained what will be stored at this site. The firm of Cheatham&Associates maybe could `helped' in providing better details as it pertains to zoning requests and not waste our time. Hopefully the City of Southlake did not have to pay them for this work."(Received June 5, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: , June 8, 2000; Approved (3-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, and: • Delete Item #l.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; • Delete Item #3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping) for existing improvements only; and • Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards) for existing improvements only. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-064ZS.doc cb-2 Tract Map ZA00-064 ,_._, ____, 1 1 ,-, - . ,....... .... MC rn - RIUM■....;ill 14aam a► v i 'm' t o O BELM �i;�` mil 14 obi AA at 4.„,„ ,.,pi �•� ♦ -IN ►►•�A�1.. . ► ��.� d o In. F- I WO° ,, A C' , ` {;, 140 1 OVF NFN 4Y,t • , L 1 2■IL,♦N 7. '_4e ,411 NV' astimirtema IOW 4 ep .....--4.14 MINI Als. IMO" 111/I 1111111 Ir 1111r I •Akill \ IN.W.‘11,,,M114 rila"11 -4.. .:I.,:, ■sh____ Milid !�■111 0 Illj. 11_ II • IIIII 4 yro _ .44)11, mia 2 te aliti - /i i�r`j,� AMIE ��1Ir• -- ,__ 7. r_j 0 �.a.gi a,10 ireu 0.:Kw.. A .....,_ 111 mmopinhe 1 it I lareali.:Zi .rl����' I 1 II�� •1 1 , LILAC ?Mil:: �1�■( ar� , ri1 I 1 -1 7-m II 'y . 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ / W / � E S D-3 Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-064 hig MIL"' I Elf 1 �, - 'Fi liii'.,. • L23 aim V 6 7 8 9 0 1 2�15 37 Re 36 ml,,,!! 19 4 n Imit 35 NM2021 i • 34 22 � . Dr 2 11N____;-._.______-------Thilli" •�Li71F. II 0 130 28 25 --k" i t I I 2� I I I Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. M.Wayland 1. "AG" 1. Low Density Residential 1. 5.00 acres 2. F.Nathan 2. "SF-1A" 2. Low Density Residential 2. 1.76 acres 3. J.Campbell 3. "SF-1A" 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.00 acres 4. S.Rickman 4. "SF-lA" 4. Low Density Residential 4. 1.91 acres 5. J.Zitnik 5. "SF-20A" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 0.70 acres 6. E.Stefanko 6. "SF-20A" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 0.47 acres 7. L.Jefferies 7. "SF-20A" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 0.46 acres 8. J.Crittendon 8. "SF-20A" 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.46 acres 9. A.Coon 9. "SF-20A" 9. Medium Density Residential 9. 0.46 acres 10.V.Mediate 10."SF-20A" 10.Medium Density Residential 10.0.46 acres 11.J.Mangels 11."SF-20A" 11.Medium Density Residential 11.0.46 acres 12.P.Smith 12."SF-20A" 12.Medium Density Residential 12.0.46 acres 13.G.Jackson 13."SF-20A" 13.Medium Density Residential 13.0.46 acres 14.D.Upshaw 14."SF-20A" 14.Medium Density Residential 14.0.48 acres 15.R.Nelsen 15."SF-20A" 15.Medium Density Residential 15.0.60 acres 16.S.Reaz 16."SF-1A" 16.Low Density Residential 16. 1.24 acres 17.D.Janes 17."SF-1A" 17.Low Density Residential 17. 1.09 acres 18.M.Garcia 18."SF-1A" 18.Low Density Residential 18. 1.10 acres 19.R.Harvey 19."SF-IA" 19.Low Density Residential 19. 1.06 acres 20.D.Mullman 20."SF-1A" 20.Low Density Residential 20.1.00 acres 21.C.Coons 21."SF-1A" 21.Low Density Residential 21. 1.00 acres 22.EPIPD-Crossroads Square LP 22."SF-1A" 22.Low Density Residential 22.7.06 acres 23.First American Savings Banc 23."SP-2" 23.Retail Commercial 23.1.05 acres 24.Wyndham Investment Prop Inc 24."SP-2" 24.Retail Commercial 24.0.97 acres 25.G.Lechler 25."0-1" 25.Office Commercial 25.13.11 acres 26.GTE Southwest Inc. 26."CS" 26.Public/Semi-Public 26.0.35 acres 27.A.Pardue 27."C-2" 27.Retail Commercial 27. 1.35 acres 28.Clardy-Ruffner 28."C-2" 28.Office Commercial 28.0.89 acres 29.R.Reutlinger 29."C-2" 29.Office Commercial and 29.13.86 acres Medium Density Residential 30.Dana's Studio of Dance 30."C-2" 30.Office Commercial 30.0.75 acres 31.Sandler Southlake Ltd. 31."C-2" 31.Retail Commercial 31. 1.87 acres 32.1709 Southlake Oaks,Ltd. 32."C-2" 32.Retail Commercial 32.2.30 acres 33.Southlake Four Investment 33."AG" 33.Low Density Residential 33.2.98 acres 34.Fountain Five Zero Two 34."AG" 34.Low Density Residential 34. 10.00 acres 35,36,37.W.Evans 35,36,37."AG" 35,36,37.Medium Density Residential 35,36,37. 19.01 acres SD.4 II t f.iffk — L VICINITY MAP t' I I I I r —�--T— T----� �- I r tto ,1 J•— _L._.—fihl�Sr•—' �'—'�1 r I l0M1 1_ i \ I II • I Mucus Waylud ..1.-- Zooing: •SF-20A• p IL _-.-... TRACT 2C _. _ •. ,1 Zoning: 'AG' I / L.U.D.=Medium Density Residential�' L.U.D.=Low Density Resdential I I j I • .i =.,' 'r - _ N89.26'WE —_-L__�__J�L_�-_ __ _IJ__ \ "- +r slrrEll'F 560.00. •g I LTJ ! ill TRACT 2B „r,. ,... i .... ...,{$ I It TRACT 2A 1E � aia7r a -- _I` 1 -- r ----�\ —1-1. ` .r �(''s - City of Southlake 1=� 1.y. 1 x( Bicentennial Park I i ft \) \EiiLJai_ =PubPanspenSpace II J � L( �7 ' \ \ W.R.Evans r t ftNlnl---tt 0 Z Cr Zoning:'AG' ' m.,1/s.e..c, Z ___________________ L.U.D.=Medium Density Residential I y� ,- •• 0 I N -_o \ PLAI6RounIG 1 City of Soulhlark i ��J r ` l 1 i }I l l lt(TIT111"- ) I �-� Bicentennial Park Z V W N / �111111111 i1i1 I - I' Zoning:"CS" __ Z ¢ .---�> c.,. a. _ 0 I--C�-I L.U.D...,Public Parks/Open Space O .N I I 1 �.I71111111mlllnmt) rB il'rtnrl�lUil!mlTilJ�a• 16 II 7v I I PI IL ,• ,utrwri,ulu.ayo Ni uuurilinnitludll lrlrl .. . -- -' -ofe aC..5' \al Vi:( 1I1 = 0. 11 Iu TRACT'3CI i _ _ .... .ro;. 1 a I m / O -i i t .,, - -_LlRAcr 3c I TRACT lH I Marion G.Truelove i Z �. SITE DATA L.U.D.=Medium Density Residential( I evwaw+ \,., h g I— 15.49 Acres,Littlebarry G.Hall I William ig:J.tastes I O 3 1O Survey Abstract No.686 at I Zoning: -C-2' • o n(�: L.U.D.=Mixed Use YAY 0cl Current Zoning: 'AG' AL4 TRACT 3D t I Proposed Zoning:•C$• I y Z v s N L.U.D.-Medium Density Residential < -o No Tree Coverage • — .l Q 'n_ _ _ice -_—� --� ___ REWIRED BOPPBRYAi1DS 4...6.. a•, 1709 - i Canopy Accent P.M. -- L l ' �I 'Maui red Provided urea Treece Shrvba "r North-SBO' 10'-C 10'-F1 17 23 70 Eaet-554' None None - - - -- •.,, I -J ��►., . u ! East-611' S'-A None 6 12 49 •'• FLA.. prc ektrI3 4.. , $ � a $ South-520' 10'-B None 10 16 52 Ice. i •as n...,.a \•��� West-1,164. 10.-6 None 23 35 116 i SHEET -.__ ... ....._.... , I .I 1 - sr•rn ' /, qL'0( '- OF 1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN • City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-064 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 06/02/00 Project Name: Site Plan—Bicentennial Park APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: City of Southlake Cheatham and Associates 667 N. Carroll Avenue 1601 E. Lamar Blvd, #200 Southlake, TX 76092 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: 817-481-5581 x756 Phone: 817-548-0696 Fax: 817-421-2175 Attn: Ben Henry Fax: 817-265-8532 Attn: Gordon Johns CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 753. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No.4,no new construction proposed. Residential Adjacency Y See Comment No. 4,no new construction proposed. Building Articulation Y See Comment No.4,no new construction proposed. Masonry Standards 1, See Comment No.4, no new construction proposed. Building materials are not provided on this site plan. Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No. 3 Interior Landscape Y See Comment No. 3 Driveways Y Existing,no new construction proposed. Lighting Y See Comment No. 1 Outside Storage Y See Comment No. 2 1. The following changes are needed regarding proposed lighting: a. All exterior lighting shall comply with Lighting Ordinance 693-B. This plan proposes adding lighting to baseball fields #4, #5, and#10, located just north of the tennis courts. The photometric lighting plan indicates that the average light level will be 34 footcandles. The proposed luminaries are metal halide (white light) as compared to the high pressure sodium light (yellow light) specified in the lighting ordinance (See attached memo from Chuck Bloomberg, Plans Examiner, dated May 25, 2000). The metal halide lights (white light) are preferred on the baseball fields for safety reasons. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00: Allow as shown) 1 (0-6 City of Southlake, Texas b. Remove lighting comments within the "S-P-1" regulations on page 2. Lighting is not included within the zoning regulations, however, it can be considered with the Site Plan review. 2. Ordinance 480, § 45.11.9 requires vending machines be wholly contained within the principle building and shall not be permitted outdoors. This plan proposes outdoor vending machines and outdoor storage as accessory uses. There are 6 soda vending machines on the site (2 machines are beside the pavilion at the baseball complex, 2 machines are located beside the restrooms near the softball complex and 2 machines are located near the in-line hockey area-See attached Soft Drink/Vending Machine location map). Additionally, there are miscellaneous outside storage areas for maintenance equipment etc. located on the site. Applicant is requesting to add the vending machines and continue the other outside storage areas as existing. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00: Denied variance for outside vending machines--Approved variance for existing outside storage) 3. Show all required bufferyards and interior landscaping as required by ordinance. No bufferyards or interior landscaping are shown on this plan. The charts have been provided, however no plantings are proposed. The applicant is requesting relief from providing any plantings except as they currently exist. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00: Allow as shown) 4 . Construction shall comply with the Residential Adjacency Standards, the Corridor Overlay Zone, Screening Requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Masonry Ordinance,No. 557. It appears by the proposed regulations, the applicant is requesting relief on all or part of these regulations. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action, 6/8/00:Allow as shown) 5. All existing structures and improvements shall be shown, dimensioned and labeled on the plan. 6. The front building lines along Shady Oaks and White Chapel shall be 30' consistent with the "CS" zoning. Correctly show the 50' building line along F. M.1709 and the 25' side building lines, west of the "A. Pardue tract". P&ZAction: June 8, 2000:Approve (3-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000, as noted above, and subject to the following: • Delete Item #1.a with the understanding that the lights will be turned on/off in accordance with existing facility usage agreements; and • Delete Item #3 (bufferyards and interior landscaping)for existing improvements only; and • Delete Item #4 (Residential Adjacency Standards)for existing improvements only. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Ben Henry, City of Southlake VIA FAX: ABOVE Gordon Johns, Cheatham and Associates VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-064-SP#2-BiCentenPark.doc 2 dD-I • City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM • May 25, 2000 TO: Ken Baker, Planner, Community Developmant FROM: Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner, Building Services SUBJECT: Bicentennial Park, Case No. ZA00-064 Ben Henry submitted a lighting plan for T-Ball fields 4, 5 and 10 developed by Musco Sports Lighting Inc. The existing park lighting was designed prior to the lighting ordinance. The baseball fields were designed to have an average lighting level of 50 footcandles. This request is to add lighting for these fields. It has been designed to provide at least 30 footcandles because not as much light is required for play at this level. The calculations show the average light level works out to 34 footcandles. The number has to be more than the design standard but as close to it as can be accomplished with standard equipment. Given these lighting fixtures the darkest spot on the field will have a rating of 21.37 footcandles and the brightest spot will have a rating of 54.59 footcandles at the exact beam center. All of these • numbers are based on seasoned luminaires. During the break in period they burn somewhat brighter. The proposed luminaires are metal halide that emit a very white light compared to the high pressure sodium lights specified in the lighting ordinance. The hps lights are more energy efficient but colors are harder to distinguish under them. Xc Paul Ward Malcolm Jackson Ben Henry • Iroct • 2011E0 5T'IA� 1 SOTNLME STATES \ w.aOR S YLLVIE 3I1-15.PAGE 1.PRICI .Jf J �_ LOT 10_ LW] LUO 011 [«T'a' Zi 'I GREEN OAKS LANE I' _L,,,,, �Or1_ MI n I �II Hi I I I a VOLUYE 3MISSION N I PAGE BJLL A ESTATES 11 OM X LL ESTATE F IA N1 N.SNOT WAS ORIK •a, .NDET•.SLIM b).MTCT i IwYOR • ir¢f rCseN GE lq If '1I 2 -20• ra.•isl....3f3 LOT N I%WII MT N 18Ph I.'I1 \ L TS¢u ROLLING LYE _ ' I Ut N ■ LOT N I UN N I LW N LW,e P LW, bS_ Tract l•le FF: IWEO M-IA S¢M [.n 1E01I =� II /` ,.am a LwIW d III I xe.•-•- - _se. '1¢'E `'' .r,Y L13w.44 J IJA<•AL7:A DRIVE 3I3 x.�rs MIK W. xlrn b•L nub •' — - - -- �* UM • 1 0.102 caNCEssIDN Tr:,zi I/�,A. ... r — w«.,c�w'a MORN. Tract 311 l Il,x..SI:r0ff2 w1YE 2Lwf bA RESTROESS /l d� A� '' PiiL -4, 01 sruA1E i ea t l-'1 �;�. unto Sr-I• 501IMA •Ta ,Eelr jH •Aas. NN won DRIVE 'r• ]IS NIL AOY OEVA S IWED Ac w•b[a«.a rill- , ! °, T i ( III II'::11 E111 o- z•-m,e Iu Y L.11b.rO.n LwtiWR . m O n r v'° ,P° A .n • ,�Ra.N EYYW MP I I _ O ' - $ I - i^' Tract!1 l 1 b IW EvxS A II O ,x // \I JL. Twa -IA 2 tfN ro� \��� C_ Ir /�/ \ —I.WL M )rmf l•,• 3110N.SNAMIY 1e01]K / .—.„ Ok 1 0 lip . / '.�IK I• Lm 7• +mr•Ma t T«l.b• - n3071— > r LOT 1 T¢f lelmf flt I �.[' I 111�. Q THE F IRST INSTALLMENT m '` m �1TTT��"���""��'�i 1I gDIAMOND C RCLE ESTATEw �,I E • V e 1 • p VOLUME 3R�-181. PAGE �1. PRT�LOT T ]IS N.sxNT 041i¢IK rt 1 , it I n4 12 LU1 LORIn r TteED SF-IA S lr¢I XI as]Or�.f lu I MSFx.1a `O 1 I' ' ° IIO LwKM Z v12,116.Pe.M ✓ •• +i� AI TS ter. oz Lw4M GRAPHIC SCALE O.REM ET•xl ed•l.,Llx/•S.EYNW wn f C• 3Is N.Mwr obi RRIK I /1 la 4 .ti• fr soxrEA•E.n [ou ,` .Eo ee.,I�r o c I m LOT 1 i owllu I . „ I I zaEo Si-1 ,.,_„. _ 11nn '«. , I It � . ��II I� :1 .Wnama .,1x.ama t �. I i •: LOT s ADVENTURE ALLEY Ar41Duo Y. . k ��y , �1r�� , "=Joa:E _H. ___t'._ =.]� ®I i Pm1x°I lrl°c,C)Cr�.', . C7 •SxWr¢Is OPIK I • •••• ^T—`� 1 I • •�r�A r' N89.51'JJ`E LPlroc zK°E two br,.lc" aYh¢f lO• i I `•'Y1.•• StameaE.11 1e¢rAix FIK ZERO Tb TR. 'rAB �, �� , �.� ,AnAEE"1''.Y1ES En r0O i I T $ter- yf�— ' —�iw-°Lo"cR DRAINAGE g1Al1EL . °® ® •® -® 11I 'L /oj / :92B'01'E iwion° - - • ..xE ... I .5.27• Lor z. a / no SRAM omoo�s ORIK 589.03'56'E 714.41' • .C LV�•r �� •I m / `am..rIK TEND NO n.. 1 ¢oALcx,nE AK s "Ilia •• 4® )/ ® II • W / on u.n Isms I -- —m•sxur[a „ �` C6.141 / LW.am• T.am a nrs.r rs• • ir I Tract M• "L' I II ° .Y•.. . ,1, Lon za.. L.e.c.xaL AomroX �LW 2WED AO `I\ . Cob. A.Slide 1216.PRTCT TJ ZONED Y-u 2OEO SE-1A LwaW II \\\ .0 :1,..: W I \ o ® REMAINDER LOT 2 Lwapt LwaOR •'�\' 6'1 n-19.24'11' swtr©z•Y. I i°IE°sr-z W TIf�SECOND II(STALL,IENT / i1•11 a® Llpyrc DIA LE ESTATES K -- l "' L B =128.69' ° - V0LU11E 3481. PAGE 69. RTC 1'{'. LC8- �'�,I' LC8=509.53'02`E �� ..I / r ■ .._ ,_i1�— LC= �V LC=128.¢e' 0.0 r 1 L0 1 s•sins LEE"'xX3 1 .. / a x I LUMLIM 606•.SIME a4o N87.21.52Y -- Tract —_—__— -- � o INNB9'S/'13'e J90.55' I / - ~ 1m a.am•I DYz SWIMMF OAT INKSIYCxi '•! 7B0.42' ✓ \\ A.IpO"-- - A 41/4 ` I • • / LOT 1 IONFO Cr ]fit IIM SAIFEI ZOIEO x 100 1•/J - •+Exmv • •_ LOT 3 'x,r 11.... Lwbt �f,Y.,� - LWRO,Tx ISO50 LOT 1 �I II 0 m \ \ ` 410 V.SaTNLARE&w 589 iE° , I '¢ '�I LrrT..t {e"jy'y�y Y. 3r,5.,.r5• IIJ LOT 2 + iigST A11Eq R'�SAY INGS B .�ITION 1 __ ioEO k TOrE0 a (\ �� 3o1�n ba L_ i1- J'16'1 •o III zm'•em fi irii•i r waoR Lwy1C IOEO 4 3 Y4.rxt5.PO.ISr /I'1 R=5659.519• CMII[I A.SLIDE 13ri• t I xll01EA4 ` . ��'I1n1If LwrE "� I I rAAWE TT- Mai L 373.16' 4, •a 1'' mu)tH J SgITNLME OARS IIIII Nn?¢0•Lus'wo '1'A•0 NIL I . LCB 584.3/'12'E J I� tr.. lwb[ • x IA. SI i0032J1 I SDI tE ILL E.IBI A.ULL• .IM Tfal.i gum W.E.HALL MET I i i �JJ4LAS.TI szu am, �� lC=J77.0�' N wll� Vsx MCTMn a m om 1.1E a SOICBR-LITTLE8ERRY G. HALL SURVE IIII • ' - t_—_—ro — - c �m F 1T0 .M _ 1 3 ___ I'... wri,o•z•,•sa1--NEC¢A HIRAM ,a..- S�THLAK"af�W ( . MULCT'REC'D I C o 9 " "'• J.Y.SrzKNSOR sum* MAY A fJ.a. GRANREARY SURVEY-ABSTRACT No.5B1 -•"•- J �• LEVARO Tr¢r lA Ii l!"1Y (.T V �OOO - 7-- ZONED 01 _ ..� — wmc ( PLAN l.a+Tr i• 'Sk A."rf• iw°mac 2 B-- o-¢r bs .lj� rL1w •. NIRAI TANEEIRY NNE/ I WOKE MAh. MOM ZOEO OI Tr¢,lL1 511 v NOWT N.so 111 KI11 LIli� PARK gi Of .vcTr•-s,n l,r b1 ASO1RlM[ON l IWEO CT•� L... WORIA J.UMER CIEAT1M11 A ASSOCIATES CITY OF i0Oi1EAEE T�rM 2 2� 6 •t• �•a 1,0•il..11 lM T llm,u, r¢f% JOWTsi[PNEx CaWW 1b1 E.LYMR ALSO.SUITE]00 LA?N.CIIi161 AY,ML 1@ IL[ fa•Q CMw[x •I IiETTI 61AifM Mil IA1SOLITILAS-ES1 MTAK AM LO NKL V.AMI AEnbCi x>It, Lw •�, ': �• .."1?-"'"2.J■L I 0.4111. xO E C:._ _E YcE Oxgy�n ;01 GIMIA J.LEMER FAX fE-AS]= FAX 11171 Ix1417B TAIEYNr CWITY•TEIAS • WED Ol isr..x.r°;.T¢IT I L] I W.ETIE.i11bM 1 r.,i� Il .y MI.TI(E l fl CimixlEi[I lir lSw COITACi1 eWi01.IONS CUIT•CT,KS IOi1T IIEYIfm E.EE/OPIEA CI LOAEMR�1 LHAN I y i CAW Na L WA1 wit I 6 1 • PROP..YESOI IPT I at � 2 , al .roof•of larwL.4.0..11 ®�i'•; •�` • c%'Fii� ro •l nydtw In ter s.rvy.AOa.sot ua.ma �TQ2G-:dn1d1SY CHART-INIIIUDB I1I108C _\�_,^'r �- __r:11n1.1 NIro a o��on a.La,I.L.Q.O.�11 6621.01.tSm;�ly a SCTeI<H,I,u. .aa In .-'A'-1-.t♦ R_� _ r;;;�I:... _ - i Cabinet A.SIt0i.�l xtt.Mat •or Tar .MT r a'" o ?i Prtlalrly ibw Cl wfw a.born.ae foil.. as e•ir91tr. f.nw V1 rtj wnf.eev f� s p1 rtl E /I->•fT.T' •••e •H •:c cans.66�;=_�a� :l'I Ya1.11M o.a pal.far no+ owner of Lot 2..1oak I.tire.Aarlom �_ f'a� Ta a • • a. 7 'IT7„ ,,�� //-•,:�r�::^E•••d�a \• :::.r' Swlnoe eat aadltl.b the CI of Savinlal•.as uI In Caelnef A.5116 1325. r^r'•rf--O IO.rIxn'•••.. 1 nua\�2... ■ 0. Pp'0111111b:nun=i Man MOT.so a pal.oleo wiro Ina avid to Me rla.In Me naln rt0..of at I In•a IMee. • • • • . • 1...r','.E 7♦- F 1i41�It � •.'-+.r._natii:. Nat Safnlaxu aat.yra IfY 12011.dole arr.to tie MOW narl.a roll.a �•,•• •' 6459.s1 feel and...at apt•a m O.a a Nn 40••o..Iro a lwp abr0 Grlro • �r""� �•1��11S '.:''�.-_ .?:.: �. 564].'12'•.a 01.1an•a JTI.m 1w.r •-` ....a.m. t"►7.� t\ ha .•r wad.Layne e.Neo.NLO. 11\ IIt��,pr.Ii� MACE .....wady allrp sole rlont-of-o.Ou vo al av Imo..323.16 left to •may ` E 1 i�[ -�rCI I� '��ally-�1��� � �•eeo point for N.sown.f Dour of.00alad X111s R.A41tlm to t1a Ciy a ; Y - 7a' I /E1L-1 •. :i`=Iiiiiigrt11111181"11:01111iill-`-+2 Salldeem w roawaw In Cmlfrf 4.SIIW f0..MTCTI 8IM11QY t8A6T-HD//BT1®9-(�0849TfENCE M W 00'Sf'1.al%M.doll tine a soil raoGlme NIII AW trim a uam .o.4:� -�-�--� � TI'�.' _ �� L�...n al.fame a 143..fwt. a point for Ito no-M•aat owner, 1aa - �••. mama'• -• :i.=.�.. ::i:;� 11ElIR N T I.'.f ti.along ir.rill 11ne a data Fmdlaq 0111 amitlm a •m . , , a •_.��1.N T -. .;/„�=� •I.•4` \�f. Olatvs a 1.)>9 Iwt.to a point Ir Oa nwtteal owtrt -F■ HENCE a 00 m•39.11.al..tva ea.I Ina of a boot of IcW by d..d to Ards sNssa� yr . -a'r�� iiii • .-::'•.dda �, nee,. r.praw In Vona*txu p.1,Po tsx.Mrm•a al•ea.o.a u.n fart.tomagmamagmaa VICINITY MAP n ,. Vona* a point for Ito na-M.ut coma, lent DOICE 1!.'.J•11. fs� • • FAWNS FAQ CALCULATION DATA allma Ite no.Ilre a sold Pia..root.a dlptmw OW- Pii.SE ti, I. IN rlrtn,twr Dour..1.1.1n1 afro al tie Wplmiry a a ...or s so+ ww ro ire�1y11'nowlro e roll.a].o.m f.•t a e.n.al aryl•a amp SO nit �._ r-. mi • ,-at��rGa.. 14 aeo...a lmp did...0 SOS 53'02.E.0 alatalw 124.00 twill M. TTENCE ably alongeld tar.wit.right. o 1.1ptt a 12..61 feet area • .emus to af.v poi.for . t II.a le Pray ail a e� Pm.� tar .'-•. SIX DATA: 1g Sot I0•05•E.a 01Ndv a 106.K .t i o+to a poi.for porno.- Ma.rv-Ill Memo VW ry • • • • 450 EST SMILAX(BOULEVARD right-of-pay Mtvf-ems Ilrr of S0Msla<o M11ewd IF.ITmlt pp.. ill 1. de moo NEN. 5.1.'01••.atop Pea not.rl am. a-o a is ft mini 60 14 ACfES-GROSS 11ne a i.Y.11m a elr.vw A 112.33 f m.f a .)r tr daMrar40 a L.2.Plink 1.5aMatdv Doa Aalltlm 2iy al Sotnlake, In C.In.A.sl tam 3231. CT1 ! r'.o.� 1••1 IEr1 LED 0.1. A(AES Vera NOF OED 0.22 AGES MIK to E •00 10•65.•.o alatmoe a 101.16 feat.to a palm 1<r tie bplminp a a • rar...zono r.. y sr.a.^L•e_i.+w......e.s..L 40.65 IE1 AGES 1i woo+mint n .roe Diu a 220.00 Mt owl o Douai aryl•a 21 a.a K win r....L ry 1111 39'00•..a 41.lvoe a 107.37.•ra pu1MN(r t.raWp°�wi0 Lto 3�left.m ao lap.a 10..09 feet to a a l rood.oft 1w.42 .to a po Me int fline r m.Colo. sir 2c oat nutna 0w0 to Me CIy a Sovmlok•no reaa.a In Colo.1161..Ppo 1326.NUT,orner of a xaat at am Y DENCE N 0.t0•37••b a alma..ef 214.14 feet.to a pot.fr Me nwtn...1 p1d too of lave by a.M to fit•City of Sa0IM1d•o.r.0r0d In Vol.. 116.Pow 1.6.DOT.. TIENCE 5 61 03•56•E.a alien.of 711-4t NN..to a poir,for to.emir... 11434 rap.rant f M.lool by 0..0 to tin C1fy a Ssv dr 0,lla asr.a0 es a. In volume 1.10CE N m 10'36••.a Platono a IItin O apt.to a pole,.to-' arr.. so a fa fro. by.P0 to t.City at Soo.dr.u reoreea In Vol.. 11..4.Pope 1326.01112. DEICE s a•E.a dt.tosw a.1.33 hut.to o poi.Ir Ma llwt.ut PROPOSED SI'-I REGULATIONS _ .10 tram a Imo by 0.•d to to City a S.Mld<o a r.0rad In Volta. �^ 1taOi•of 526.MTCr. TWe of Pr.ici 1.b lnlen.141ra2L. Case No._LA 017064 ` at.O.XIA I(sfataseIgl•lopto2MMe City'.50.11laok•w r at.'orwe In anti..A.aI 01 I. K].MiCtl t Proposal Negualioes Caw.. 1NO l - ICE 5.f 10'0•E.a al..oe a 1.t]03. fee..too poiforrtr.a.t wow t.n I Pam..Usa Same as CS nr a a Moot of loud by 0.2 to to City at Sattllale at two..In Volts 412. 2 Accas<ory Uses Sure AsCS.and addinglighld tennis courts,lighted - Pbe 713.ORTCT. le poi.Nlro In t•wart riot.-ofyy I It.a anon•it. baseball fields concession wJh blucMuv unoaoi.oi vies, Mabel ealavrd. paelict folds,ouldwt vending,oulsid<bodge. 13ESieE 5 01 22.0•I.al soil wet rlOtvf-•vy 11 Olftaa.a 903 I Sprcif Usc Parma Sarno es CS Wt.too poi.b Me rvYnevt emir a by.w 10 PD FPI - Or000wod l a Saa w �.d ra In Vol..1ll.f.Pape•2.M V TCI. Develapraepl Nagulaboto S..X..CS.<.wp ao.nlaiofl.a .pie.. _ MINCE a 09 00 It'N.a aletw a tortl n. s111.15 fat.to a poi.tor tne no... bulieryudl&pivut�uC hotrod MINCE oca.r a sold Mao a 1.61 by..01 to 11.1P0-Cr-man..5drrd w r.a-d d In 11 Hcilht Sam<u CS Colts 13740.Pope SS.OPTCTt DENCF 3 Al War•.a elafovw Cl.1.63 f..t.to a poi.M Me....at .2 from Vaal 25 tout wWN.<Ac.p 10 O.along s.tv Sou...solo FPIPO-Oa.. .a gear. mil Houl<v.d(FM 1]Wt our.' 1NFNCE N II 54•32.•.a dt.taw Of lr ea 22.19 feet.to a polo+fa-♦I.e tt tt 1_3 Sick Yud 25 trot width oarnor a a mad a Imo by aaq to t•City a Soylnla•m rhaaal In Cons 4.4 Na Tod 25feo1 width 13741.Pape 61.MTCTI IIENat S 00 01.36•E.a alatmw a 1.4.14 f•.t.to a poi.Ir ow-nor In t.nv'M .5 Maximum l_ulCov<..sgc SamCasCS ftEC'C M i\Y 2 �� 2000 line a o a Ia.by e•ac to 1.City a 3a 1111.•w rwwdp In Volu.13211.Pap. .6 Maximum Imp...luvcr 23.MTCTI ag< SmcssCS 11F11fE M I1 21'Ol'E.0 dlataa a 25.T1 f.et.b a poi.W tM yvYtneef .7 a-,UooA D<v<bpm<nl R<guluiom No rhiannel maaonry swa rds apply.Nasorning E.tmul hghnng wll M afraed away from of yy to foe hi0tng uses ly..within 400 f l device lryui1d.4.411 10 msidenlul zoning. No Msid<aiul p.ap.y 1JA T11. pit.wTmaee wlrtbWlro tl nMfirCity aw.t lira a iof trim ea0a.a 1lal lbl� I of vogk l.,64y ncs,4nual zoning. ronidur1onmecn sl0Mad apply. Building and AOd1tlm to tfa my a aoyttldo.v recra d In Cminat A.Sl la 1214.MTCTI additions anailxE Marcia may<mulau<.oti r� Ng .Lg u,fs<s,.nJ...vowel epic ■ r`M I sat 1I•I1•E.o al.ta.o.a Slam ey fee a av eo t,to I.fr me. Mt ••,+ate-.,.w� ----- LOT I I. BLOCK 1 11lEa a..Moot 10.by O0 to ire City at S aNtllat•o.req.*In MILL* BICENTENIAL PARK ADDIT[0!! a a .P 13131,Fop.2!.LV T ..u1G p-l.oleo b•1n�,ma .....a.cow a lb 1.Bleak 1. pI TO 1HC ICC CITY < TNLLKE f Iret A...-loop Siw Ira;.Co.:a... a0ll ien to IF Cly of 5ovin10.e.a raI r.od In Cd+Ine1 TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS • A.Slick 13..t^ICrt ladle. • I 1'. BCi1a'.Et.al ACPri FEC:TJff 1,....9. 'tit NJEC.Si-1 t to ap.e:G 11r.t Anrlam S.r.11a 6mo Amltlm.a VCtIAC.2.Pipe.3. �NG ff., ow pal.far Ill rar1M••et owner. Y.21.4.7.Par im.122.11£1..E.PfOxi 2, nAIME 11131.fat;23.V1adc 1145,PAm 2211 TO 50. o Cd It'll•F.uoi.}one a 2.0,21 11-•..It.POMO'Of 4C0IN11X0. E.1e.r No.91.11551�132C.101 Oar.11.04.LA6 M4.5 ova w.relnim 61.4i ao Cu laic.P- >la.. • COeRYd2.do+P.10CFCobal AT t uo use KING A rule Cr LOT z. <•yyFTfYii NC NMIOQiEO �Y� IN IE 'A'.AIM 0.101. C1216 nt CotdD1.1N L ASSOCIATtS CIIT Of S0IDEA%E t IIEm105. AMuff.1121± TFI(AS 1601 E.LAI11E 1L5D.SMITE xm Kl M.GAP..GAP..ACEME SITUATED IN DIE L.0.0 NALL A APE IMT..TE.5 16011 Sa1r1LAEC.TEIOT 16m2 AOSIIUCT No.NI.TlaRWI GOAT,lLYAS lily)5410406 111111 401-40Pt art to ONE LOT FAX filth 215-4.2 .110171 - 15 Iat..21.IS. 2 l'• t 00.001 Ca.TACTr.FM KiaC 0.2 No.IA 0006. S.EET 2 a I i ,1 i I ' f 1'1 � ,.. �.:�;.� i� L I ' .III t: 1 I r II( ,.,,. i i i i; ! Ili f; I-.1.. Tarot,'rc ' loulnnrE nl{I t ' 1 , �� , r mat magma MICE II I.Mal TOipIOIE EEVI{t , r..., 1 ^" it t .,! �. �I� .� I I CONCESSION �' ,• ••^ ,• `1 u «N. I , . .I, RESTROONS "�r.,A7EiI e.an ' ... c.,...".i CI.�.. _ ., ,, • _ .,. 1. • 1 e ., , . I I ,.. „ , iI� .. .n• i ,r — QiM i RIEII�OIIME 1.� .fa. I D I I -i ESN • I I ) J . fi I i souk nLu I \ _, , • 11 O.nwxrw ,� ` ." ! , :n I I IY I GRAPHIC SCALE I I �^ a` i a . • Ill ., i ,� I I l I I �, yl, ). I L7; 11 II 1 I'Ii �I � ~ 1 .. "..,, k. �;}(;'� :.,,\''� I awR+eilE c NiFfl 1 '' %` I I I 'I,_-!i L AYGbCIJND I 1 I . I \ I�� 1 x. 17•«y..} I L..' i f�l ADVENTURE ALLEY P • • II I : I r� T I: TIRE Ei _= n r. I � DRAINAGE CHANNEL I I . it '� i i„ SJ [' Ti I EE� EE • U i 1 , jl i�'NINI EOfLII»SURE u „ q di :,:... -c.-.0 . ' `I/ O 11 • �II ,.T.MM,.,,MA.. Soft Drink f� i� 1 ,,, :ru Vending Machine cr. �1,� A MEW M ®:� Locations 1. il IrAnrriig l� � . �, r � niw `%\\\ uec .„ _I I 'I °:'i' ti'l�l I,a. ,� �.� i_ IN iJ?L11 I II I1 I'i i h i t,.:; i I f,llll it i.� , I 'I I ,i q, 11 . ___ __ I , _____ __ F I, 1.11 tl r • K'. - — "• 11T { In.i Y III u„1•r:AiU ,..1• .,,• f I - I • ,<•�� • i, 5t�7ul+story I '.0. I ,a Ilr OF n x I n: r»„ ., M., a,h n { "i` ,ir',:" MI�W 4.UPSCrTR LI0 0 e•IaLAU 1 Y,'1 1 1 , j x I c.L l fain TOO M1 IL WOOLS AMU SITE PLAN u �x .,I "' /[4y 1« - Mn •ILIMfM.TfLi IMU SoOKAff.1.41 Ism .0 yY I. f , II. IAIIIL«wM «I-9.I.,.IS. I BICENTENIAL PARK ru a N�«s, FAX ISM 01•41Tf » I . , I.,I, I •" • .. .' F� .,•i I 1'.,;,, "I ., SWUM UMW ARM mMAeu MI Milos„ CAv aA.V «-m 1MT7 I M 2 , a 0.0.0.00.10 .*'.'-' ' 040444.4r7, . '.-"' ',:>-•,!''.'''. ' .'`'. ' ',.,.'1/4.'"...••• 14''''' '''4,i;,:'...H.,1,,..._`..„,,,.,,...:^i -t'''S'...),:•.:'•.,.:4.,• t`� - +Y.b' ' .,.sa'rr - w�4ja'�'..`W'a 't-..''t• � � .y "4. -y. fg,,4 7 • ' iN At .!'$ A r ls N Y .F �� r n4 � i*Nos, " 0 YM .E A'1 ♦ k, �1 � � q,..'ix „� Z � r' tl M. A YttttYIIkM Y d. p ,,h,�` . • • _ i a y A PJ taw F'• wdb#«ek;a ',i t*n . "tlxpS ;`,:: �u6 ;% ;fy a y a f " B sa>'r 't F Y,.t> ya- l i - w. xf, 4 • • r..._, ri c �:`s 'a, +^. ''! >" SCr .,e ( 10 ",un t ,,4 .rA t r. w.r"^,•n .. b ".... - +nit e, p H F 4 . • • Z SF 4 a. qk N. 4 • aAXt • R.-$rfl„. y #y}N N, in-line Hockey Location ^� c, xs • @a r s - Y', i ; " a�. �' a - - 'x� Jri }. • • � e geo. ** • ai '. 4.4 yay y 4 }�r vda c`;a'r fi s V 4 3-: • ry r r, µ « rs • Softball Complex Location `6D 13 V. a 4 i f- -T--- -1- a 1 ,.., S >" _ t , ,, !`; kte+'',ems . •' a1,;A. J j� " P.` ., if -x^a Ak „, 9 i .'Niko T '- phi �_ : 'k°a � f. w L� a ViT a . ' " ,, ,+y is. a "'gw-f ds ` ro- 1.. .,,., -d c-,zr; s+.ram .,',...:,,,. 'I. ..;,r,,.R9+tr, aft r= s a, '.. .a as' ' . r+^ as+ . - � +�'.' -rc ? tad ' a, v' $:, n .lam t M �� �s :,,� x Baseball Complex Location ,D ILI CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-345 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2R2, L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDES 5299 & 5300, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND TRACTS 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, AND 3D6, SITUATED IN THE LITTLEBERRY G. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 686, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 61.61 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, "C- 2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, AND "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH LIMITED "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE LIMITED OUTSIDE STORAGE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 1 �415 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 2 and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 3 ��-Il therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are • needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 2R2, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 5299 & 5300, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 1, 1B, 1C1, 1C2, 1C3, 1E, 2B, 2A1, 2B1, 3C, 3D, 3D1A, and 3D6, situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 61.61 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District; "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District; "CS" Community Service District; and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District uses to include limited outside storage as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 4 be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING 1480-345.DOC Page 5 (6Ptq SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 6 ( .2D of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 7 D.ZI APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 8 iD-22 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being several tracts of land situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract 686, and also being a portion of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition, to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point for the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1325, PRTCT, said point also being in a curve to the right in the north right-of-way line of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709),said curve to the right having a radius of 5659.58 feet and a central angle of 03 deg 46 min 40 sec, with a long chord bearing 584°34'12"W, a distance of 373.09 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said right-of-way curve an arc length of 373.16 feet to a point for the southeast corner of Woodland Hills RSU Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 608, PRTCT; THENCE N 00°00'39"W, along the east line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87°24'49"W, along the north line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 00°00'39"W, along the east line of a tract of land by deed to Arch Purdue as recorded in Volume 12651, Page 152, DRTCT, a distance of 68.76 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87°24'49"W, along the north line of said Purdue tract, a distance of 271.58 feet, to a point for its northwest corner, said point being at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 380.00 feet and a central angle of 19 deg 24 min 14 sec, with a long chord bearing S09°53'02"E, a distance of 128.08 feet; THENCE southerly, along said curve to the right, an arc length of 128.69 feet to a point for corner in the west line of said Purdue tract; THENCE S 01°10'55" E, a distance of 106.66 feet, to a point for corner in the north right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709); THENCE S 87°37'01" W, along said north right-of-way line of F.M. 1709 a distance of 112.33 feet,to a point for the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1,Southlake Oaks Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, PRTCT; THENCE N 00°10'55" W, a distance of 101.76 feet,to a point for the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 270.00 feet and a central angle of 22 deg 56 min 13 sec, with a long chord bearing N11°39'00"W, a distance of 107.37 feet; THENCE northerly, along said curve to the left, an arc length of 108.09 feet to a point for the northeast corner said Lot 2; THENCE N 87°24'52"W, along the north line of said Lot 2 and Lot 1, and continuing a distance of 780.42 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE N 04°10'37" W, a distance of 274.34 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618, Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89°03'56" E, a distance of 714.41 feet,to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 2287, DRTCT; REC'D MAY 2 3 2000 N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 9 `6 D-23 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE N 00°10'56" W, a distance of 1165.42 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89°01'08" E, a distance of 579.33 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE North, a distance of 22.73 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of Lot 20, Oak Hill Estates Adition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 683, PRTCT; THENCE S 89°10'10" E, a distance of 1303.14 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 4928 , Page 733, DRTCT, said point being in the west right-of-way line of North White Chapel Boulevard; THENCE S 01°22'40" W, along said west right-of-way line a distance of 805.58 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to EPIPD- Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT, THENCE N 89°48'11" W, a distance of 518.15 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to EPIPD-Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT; THENCE S 01°10'23" W, a distance of 99.63 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of said EPIPD- Crossroads Square tract; THENCE N 89°54'33" W, a distance of 22.79 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 81, DRTCT; THENCE S 00°04'36" E, a distance of 184.14 feet, to a point for corner in the north line of a of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT; THENCE N 89°28'01" E, a distance of 25.27 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT, said point being in the west line of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, PRTCT; THENCE S 01°11'27" E, a distance of 314.83 feet, to a point for the southeast corner of a said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT, said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1325, PRTCT; THENCE N 89°51'43" W, along said First American Savings Banc Addition, a distance of 390.55 feet to a point for its northwest corner; THENCE S 00°41'30" W, a distance of 250.24 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 61.61 acres of land, more or less. F:\WORO1So°thlaka1941\PROPO DESC.wpd- 29NOV99 N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-345.DOC Page 10 1D-24 w ° n o r C -. �ant4E starts ya \ { l.aMmg_ R. 7a b, , -�R l i - / GREEN OAKS•� }' _� I ,Y„ LANE I ) VOLUME MISSION ise HILL Lc[ESTATES ot.r _ Lan.• — • 1 gyp—/ I IU I O.MILL ESi tEiti \( 0 2o"�:ew'1 dAa101.1�. 1 r R °. Ials aN I .N u„ ,NI,. a II g .:.". •.,.« §N IL. -- tee• ••nail !/' —« JLno>u — J 7iVAf&4A DRIVE m i:a'sue.°°.ss.sic'" �-'�- W F '� . z IzlleEnta .. l� � ��j� t] z w°a"" swn..E.n no" �'°. PAYROCAIS v. fir'/ y _ 8 •' ._„. '+ 1t.2� Lii,�s x //' �i MALE MII[ I' (�' w�.asa •... rYw ~ I II '•,i1 E., ' s:'u• ralEw .c l.... ' �y I II III I` jr"11'�,;;ill N oo.wr 'NE v.na 1 ro. I, U o— •• //L .. • I —=.%dam. ^.• I CV- • rri LW N Trsl MlmrlY 17+A. I *çç1, 1� • EIENT• I.i - T4TE�gI iti or AGE TM1,.. tor ' win ✓ rS! • I toot• twAn � .Arnlal .— L GRAP$IC SCALE a s.I.AE en ] �: , Ems__-M'mT:ee .17. a. aM 1 � w•k N . LI:\...1,2,.... Iller/ `44 — 4 "'".—. , —....1.1• X Illibr II ii P ........SAM �7 AOV[NI1NE ALLEY 1 1 T p u p� 'y�—J ���` . ,'� , g i R°n'`m'UM 6 ,« " ,sro... ilk L Q U Ei /^ �_, i s ' _ r �N.s,3r '� .... as. y ,M" VVV • I _ M�wI^"srz. I $_r Est/ 17.- i. v.n,s >s. DRAINAGE CRAWL ... �.. - - _ e®®.N.H. e•® -e " /ram'% C CU 1 2 M 9 21'O,'E u�I am.dxEn.c ri "' . "a�r.'or rs NM SB9.03'S6'E 1II.II' • :d/, \�\� ._. ..._ m /• / �,Ksnn°" ��I _ _ _ —......� "_ II'i .� _ O �Et& (n- .1N �t:,.�"II®'),• ti. • J / / 1..oO r.�Msm,niY I •IRRR`� '� i .Y....o. \\ Llnaili ■ 111, • • E-..,__,--_ • =IF 1 ! wca°.a.°slid.`21c LVRIT� C=2 im:a-'• =ylam•�iY,'I `�\� tEQL]1 1tm�{•-1. W i I REMAINDER LOT I T SECOND IN TALLIENT / Icapt t. \ 6'1' G=19.11'f1' ✓U LJ t un+cIA CI LE ESTATES 4ic1 \r[ ®A=vo.00 Vie , u® �®11 1 ml l I2e.69' I VOLUME J e1. PACE 69. RTC `1,L _ CB:509.53'a2 E n _ , 1 �1 LB _ Lc 9 '•' LE.fze.oe' O O 1-� —sr.Issa.a••••° / \ wna�ssM, rs a" NBI• ._ •- ___._ ` '$ I •N89'51,3•11 II ...,J9O.55' l m.1 \.••.am$1'S1•� LOT 1 Lott ',A 1• + fao.'1-I ,q,,,,,. �� _ .... u I till LOT z se9• 9� -^ wT] • sV LwI OM csrA¢T ' L °a ty11 ✓lg,uC\�\ °sdiprili -_ - •1 I)•16''''' I o FIRST•iR R61 S.VlxcsB t�lT11 l� a•� am Z.• . T. as° ' •,L¢ Il.h.,v .�i'd A= 659.54 II[r..ala Isn. d�NMR I :ii:j:w«i y sWTNLAI(E AM ES�I — III ,ss.w'",I,n,y uu xla sy- L=]7J.16 I� .« ` ••."•.•• a ELim•o, ! oRa.s ,sdu•�' _I�•.�$. LCB•SB/'N'12'1 c �„� °auc A•Bl id•32]1 S Lc•1T1.�' Im ..I-L 9•MIr 1 — — >_ III g - :. •�`gy.^z" g Ere.",rtncecrur R.HALL BORYE ::: j1j a• L't-__i_ 1` Al ��I _g,[ 2 RREpR"'Hsu GRu1BERR ' ^ ,•; -. - Q cF s•Y''" •(IB.CD MAY 6 ZOO *SMVEr- _ --RE nosy an CDroo-E ABSTRACT NP.Se, +r-l�.i... J L.y �.EVM -- SW W.•iF ..N O , — I RMa °� �_1,y ;tea er .n.,R. w«' xm s a xa• �.Er SIZE PLAM m -INOiliE ,.a.>< W II.d•..fAro �.CRI.... BICQITENIAL PARK a.aa % r# ®l u1 • •_' WM%OAP. w XIM.isxu"ide,"`® °°'IN.`tam 661-41411• Y Aiadi'o°aia.0 MAIM s,..l m Brmm IR na levlo 6/tlxMd•ll At a • �1 1 aN[ru.n RIw IAJiiail p11 ,r T' ' RA.w ''OHO" ia� 71 _,,..L 'J MAN.n nln 'we CLOW J.LIMN mrt241 o.. es r'•ci1'a 1 4,4 M i.Mw�'d'a.o..row C.Re.to de-w • o CJ •G PROPOSED SP-1 REGULATIONS 0 0 Title of Project: Bicentennial Park Case No. ZA 00-064 ro Proposed Regulations Comments 1 Permitted Uses Same as CS 2 Accessory Uses Same as CS,and adding lighted tennis courts, lighted baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales, practice fields,outdoor vending,outside storage. 3 Specific Use Permits Same as CS 0 4 Development Regulations Same as CS,except no interior landscaping or bufferyards&planting are required. 00 _ © 4.1 Height Same as CS bd y 4.2 Front Yard 25 foot width,except 50 ft. along west Southlake Boulevard(FM 1709). 4.3 Side Yard 25 foot width 4.4 Rear Yard 25 foot width 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS 4.7 Additional Development Regulations No residential adjacency standards apply. No screening External lighting will be directed away from for building uses lying within 400 feet device required adjacent to residential zoning. No residential property. of single family residential zoning. corridor overlay standards apply. Building and additions attached thereto may emulate existing construction materials,surfaces,and architectural style. F'WORD Southiake`.94 I'.SI'I Regulations.wpd EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING 1480-345.DOC Page 13 A) 1 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-055 PROJECT: Plat Revision - Lots 1R1 & 1R2, Block 1 , Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition STAFF CONTACT: - Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of proposed Lots 1R1 & 1R2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4813, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 10.537 acres. PURPOSE: To provide individual lots for the church and cemetery. LOCATION: On the west side of Lonesome Dove Avenue approximately 300'north of East Dove Street. OWNER/APPLICANT: Lonesome Dove Baptist Church CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public NO. NOTICES SENT: Two (2) RESPONSES: One (1)response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Coy L. Quesenberry, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church, 2380 Lonesome Dove, Southlake, TX, in favor, "It is a matter which will benefit the church and hurt no one." (Received May 31, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated June 2, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-055PR.doc Tract Map ZAOO-055 V - , , H..: R - h -. 01,4at. ra,- >4- 1�'•wl•. 6 i m`�� LL , 7,00 W WO :.-0 - s 1=1: EL .. • • A1I1IflvL F i.�,..�z:�,�� rrr..r I 4 Act- - _■! ; JF E �..iu ii ill foil- -+ ; , �� ����� CITY -- �irma O F i' IIRMIIWp GRAPEVINE cn t < a =s_ — -{ xi D xi ==iim _ r r NINE _ D,i _ PRIMOI( / ISIOlek ilk' .. Y1( Ti* ttil . — ,;J'.'" �� : — D--___I— . S0 —Di —I — VA-- '--\ ril—'-1 • • 2000 0 2000 Feet N \ / W � � E S cue-)- Lot 2Lo a vee Doone states.Phase I.BLOCK I cabinet A.Slide 2792.,rm,I an I CP. n,,,,, No x39.5Pcco 1 mot 31 ' Lot 32 I ate. —n'Ihit� .a MSe'].JE Ise.e seerlse Tr1�311./IC�.1 rTSi�i-2 1 ' a.solc.irr r i,x .i4'r fast—pro f T.. _1':� y _ _ _ _ 4� .a99 _ r sots of toss. ., ,.: I r r1.n �'Early F... +• " c t ,». horn..[ t Y a 'C / - .mob / I I 0,Ca .. .ram. s..rawnw.1 »»Dore C.c.. .r arms tr - � 4 �j_ / I ✓1 I 3 �d lets.. Its ,.. ..:` 'M A..No» la'tl City• el el —1-- CO .' , clyan ._ i I I 0 i ....i.e. D..Pale,q.itr]�.`I�.�'70.O j";a,'H. Pli / l/ �hl,.r� ,� o I ! I J Pew 11▪ a.2.s.r..:'ioile..: r......r rl..«..rlw �. o;o yy{ \ Cit roof Southldte.Leif Lne .enlrsr sets •<1r..el.tennis r.»Inlet ro L.'. 'AL . II- —. ,,,..:•-•, 2 w Q o 6 rCiry of Grapevine.Lint Line °«.1.•oleo... .w�i:<'r« sea n. a mew \ 1W e,.l `5,. • N....'1.Tartest MK..o m 1 point al. 1oetr.North..ii cl O.amor t tetrho yeeeeeee is vein.see-tes.w[eMw` �r.rho e. '4e'r.:.:r te s p asp w 11•Ivh4 • 1 `�1e. � •ot t It'i.«Oro.. °o:w.'w'icow.m»cam. n:ri..N.ui r«...1.0.300 `ale 4 RlN I I Jd' line:.North n roes. ..la sealer w.a inter reet to 6 a fPelee or t t»a4 e.sn»r.ar»a »tl wet al.Vicinity Map • �u J Ill — — — • Dane..'. ... C.a.:to Or peet core.of lat'.e.erten,•ae'Cable'e.e.. ellr r'�_�I. F4 I. i ...a. ,1r.r 1.�1lea. „...a 114..IY the r«.flea.l e� e1«.1 et 4. 1 feet•.'.•tree lei..[t.teeth«a —P-0A.41 `•O� 5558 SY r I .i oursaid 0.340 acre tr«t...eel.to�'Is tea Y.tu»et..harm..»r OWNER/DEVELOPER �" � J t t'tss • 531 NCI es i Ilse i • le..feeetale tb11...a wit ort23 r:;`�outhe.cor.`.r`oi1s..11.0.300.. LOPESOHF DOVE BAPTIST CHLSK 1 a,o,na toe 10• 1 d .,'..r...„........e...»...»f 1..n feet[a.»1« Coy Oueseeder.Pastor Ins ,ie 2380 Lonesome Dove Avenue �� �� I 6 r Mee..Co. »oleo tWde.Texas 76092 * i„. a O`'K I I I j tau.le..sole. .e.. .oe.t.1.ee t•...leo r.. ion 488-9568 �'� + V j r `»».„ra..e1 Mor bte sin.. nor corner; »secf..... et)1 f.l»a..lle- T t `fa* .`L N.re feet 1/l•Ir«.I:Ionr.i�tctee•rer..�[ • SURVEYOR I :tlLet I.•EIM I.eneral.rt..; LIAREFI(:E W.HART.RPL.S. • MM.rr .e degrees a,.oe a11» Mao Svveye.,Yc t tt�. w Not. r Y)2'W.TreatmA Street .l I f.wit.s1«a., t foot t. AS o:retwln'.:.... Fort Worth Texas 76140 tn.a. • r11 «lean«see N 1. 18171 293-afi94 {, 8 r._.-_._..___..._. .or.nm,ve OW.0.....shoe by ' I i le..le.e».m.eht a e'�e..`tea:.•` • .false 1.w.. :lock Y[ 1 v I i '°" _.:.`. �rr.,.t.t,ii..ee.rr.'...1.•...r.1.-- oear.:. a,�c puc ». en • at .a 111 a # ....,J.m..r, mast .the gaf Wch I ! lion.r r.... see11. • S.� I 14I e n • ee„»r er,..soon ' r. - : I t< 1 b a ��...... the.rot;:':.ae„_[m se...1,per.ee.e,;,,el... 0 50 100.191.11.1•31 — — la S I : ` leettr� w1.17*hereon e ee...l..ea.to me that'r a»t.theee attee.NM ear MO v • I O aN▪ e• eact IV INr�..•t 01 we N l•trac.leel[r[rr•1'•thaN. S 01741 el I f r.mm.aee ar.• /'a/ iu NOTES 1 Seim o p rton of Lot sehn If.Mclean by roes eel bands t 'T—. '�I� _ •m.. f mote fle•� ordnance and a abject to al I I! 3 1 t'"ht'°ti5 bd6y( .. J�I F.d Plot z.Tin..y r Salo o room oe doe r wih LOT I.BLOCK Ifloor ee.e see on any lot swoo ed tahnec do.roan The 0 I i eleratm hose ore bated ate met orrmw ota.aen o.dt6 Q feed end bmOf °Theke hat Ike 'd""'e' o be abject to f f LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST floor entente I IA A'; SIRVEY0R5 CERTFICATgN 3 There ate no 1,ana.e with r da to the I I a lime a el..,..1 a..».x.r.•etrr.N • ''' "`""' \ I I Falaihe bow ed F We CHURCH ADDITION, —..1 ' \ . ;m 6 -t-d lot mete nut nee rmpaml An add6on to the Gt of SoatNdee.Tn-cent County.Texas. \ _ a«oe ehd r al m APPROVED BY THE PLAPNJ(" 6 ZONING COMMISSION I I \\ I o w1 -. d odupie an, tip~ b N.E.TFiIXY ON SURVEY.ABSTRACT No. g re t.271 Acres. �• N°r»""6"' P,• a I a \\ I U x I R vn�✓ October.1998 Chairman: e_11�1t�1�i \ — �f sole.w. Y �„�`� J 5'1aE \ U.da .Emory.Vol D14.P�52 .I p I anon., Mnefxled Jvurr 1999 a r . ..e— .� «wit. •,— ,� ZA 98-132 G Sevmrer: ` __ {o°;•=�., (Witte'WS ;; � 1-0,6 \ �"«4 Los G— �. — Lor 0 wi" rw'-' fy ., :? III EMERALD ETATES .BLOCK t Veil 388-165.Pg.48 �iy' I A•e.f4e,�t3 !zir",Ze"ti,.Lr_ �"t 1.i I Y 811�99 ARIA SURVEYING,INC. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAT r k City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY • Case No.: ZA00-055 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 06/02/00 Project Name: Plat Revision - Lots 1-R-1 and 1-R-2, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition being a revision of Lot 1, Block 1, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, being 10.537 acres out of the N.E. Thompson Survey, Abstract No 1563 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Area Surveying, Inc. 2380 Lonesome Dove Ave. 102 W. Trammell St. Southlake, TX 76092 Fort Worth, TX 76140 Phone: 817-488-9568 Phone: 817-283-5684 Fax: 817-488-9568 Attn: Coy Quesenbury Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/25/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. 1. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old red • courthouse). There is a service charge of$10 per account for this certificate. For more information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at(817) 884-1103. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Coy Quesenbury, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church VIA FAX: ABOVE Area Surveying, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE • N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-055PR1.DOC Page 1 i \ Larec Drne Eatmea.Phone L BLOCK L net A Side 2792 `{' �. Owt9is tHiTE1Ga,TE o/ � \1i- Liu."' m 28 Lor 29sI ,�L Stan of Tema ) 68 [Y e'w:i«.i .1r «I.71 Sine .2' -�R >s pf�` `p!I9 - ,- Q F b Davy r� ' a 24 Comfy of Tomb ) TN0T"REAq Loma.Dow P�ri Cd.rds amg b od 8w 'Li•_ 9 ,o- d diy aahaud .h..i a. iLa L i o4A . T .eery» a°Zu ��e ea"c .ern s:a4a. ' Ts Pica R.s h T to 3 T34.Pwe 50.Van Z 3�P 76.ad Vdw n red accrbq'39d Pd•recorded767 Deed P.vh Gm of o { 1 Feet e m,r Cry of SouthJdce.Limit Line Tarar cw�ty.i.ma oa bey d..abed by..w ad begone a Veld S� \ ie i . City of G-apevne.Limit Lire el y 01 4J►� BE6HfY m e VT eon pi:fond n the Won Fs f Lonesome Done Abbe. a' "m 52\$ p198 .4, 4. a cid pp beig the NuArar carer of or Lot LoNook l cid poet d.o bag o' 1(`y 2 �. a ,r. Vye the Sonhbe caw of Len 32 Nook L Law.e.e Dore Fob.rfiow t 1 a 5.y'i s I C> Qef .Kb plot recorded w Cobh,A Sid.2792 Fin Becah Torah 0,.3¢SQ G �eco M.4.y9. hU E bob 00 degrees 35 Cm«37 cocci Wen.ddaaya the Woe it of Ul e @ ' __ Lonesome Dove Acme 100285 feet to a 5/8.'ra per 1wd for 4.Saheb J l cid Lot l BFk L rod poen deo bag be tda8.ar corn of Lot V. Vicinity Map18 L, Pg.40PA.booba drr.:adh.plot r.cordar.Vdce3885s O1�' m i1BYE Noah 89 de 34 Come 44 vale Wort 45939 feet to a yr --JP.O ' pp.n.roved fa A..,o0.rt cor«r d.wd Lot L Bbk L.tld poor do Erg 00 Iha tdoithwr aon..r of Lor 6 Bbk l brdd Eata.M3tioa OWNER/DEVELOPER r2V•- \\ • `•`o 6' r, 7) North 00 ddp.a......47 rw..45 wed Eat 72970 reer to a r eon 2....1 co0y pm lard for..tbth.ar rnr d Lot 4 B6k L Enar«Addno..dd LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST r7ARGi ems"." •.a 60 ppoama da A.Son).at oa,.r d Lar 27.cWk L Laeeew Do..Cab. Coy 0...«Lvy.Para era t_____ PFw L aboar�3y to Ero ply reoa.W. t 4 Yi.f929.Plot Beeord. 2 Lareao.Dow Av«.. I �' Tarot Canny.Taut Swhici T..a 76092 fool 488-95689.99 feet to a face ' +q' -$ rot fond For r143iCF North b�,.N ....u,.r of degrees 26 sob 2.o-J Lmdl tllod l Wen b..id pool d.o bee Ilw 2 .,wtlwt comer of Lot 26.Nock 1 Lonesome Dow Eric.%....L above r.fr moo SURVEYOR W hENCE Sash 89 den..58 mince 33..rnd+Ear.46471 feet to h.PUNT OF CL°JSDICE W.RAfT.RP1S. Z BECiNiG ad meows 415.987.qwm feet or I0537 acesof bd. Are.Serveyyengq b. 102 W.Tra.md Street 1 y; NOW.TFi33'FafQ_KNOW of..en by lb...pr...nrc 4 Fat Worth Tens 76W0 �+ ' clip (8UI 293-5684 / Q` OG� g� .._ hlATAA a Loocooe nhand °bons «�hr }e pit by ad 8ra.}.alec h. anL,we .+ V v baked pr to b.Moen..Lon i..4 soo°-a2'lNod I.Law.w Dow cSde i 16 Furor dwrh nddnon a,nddw„ro!.��ay of swilJda ia..9 Co„ey. �,J 1.=.a ad do hereby ddom.ih.nd+.of.ry�vaad J,o..h.vm to m obi', TM den do..car dt cis*deed r..n++e>n. mo deeaq.a r property. t C. .� pV Anew en hood of Sor ddka Torr.aa Coen,Twice m be the ' dry of 2000. 1 Sod. J �' Ir k sta.of rob g CLo%ne.mDov.4M Grrd. r-50' 0—__jpp rJ : I �, C0.'7 d renal l a r0 . 1 ... E Before D.em d`. ow w;o three* a ra x. �:ri ai:ra:- q�f*wince* .aneAped w.. l..wn.d/..a.rr the ad F.tp1ES O„` J►t a Feel oceen deco motel me at de cc cod bed of oid ebb one ode y feed and W d Wheel,.ea in dry of 2000. l SJw a paeen d Loi who A+a Ad6ion Vice ad bead. F pI 2 f r Ai.a'H.d araab.ad w.bpn to FAL,perch,' F n 8 `- AO $Q G qe n.Ceya' 9ao,w»noon.the nano b fief. P t W Nosy Pubic F..d for the Sror. .bar d..afa.or en Ft ante..Cie}i .1o. me ebb w •� g18• .f.2.GS z r r..a. brace iue co bred a the at bre.ea.,.eame 6fret t e few find ad be en�cr j ' My Cabin..,glee a a hr w a ice«w .a'�a b.aa'. dam:fi.h° noon acr. s J.There a.no L1.dcWre Oh r.yd.N in Korey. E w _ $q -- filar B.v.a. J 4 3 2 LOTS I-R-I&I-(2-2 BLOCK 1. APPROVED BY THE PLnr G a zaraNc cormessaN SUtVFYORS CSITncATION LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST Dole: "`'y"ne,al `" °"sle, CHURCH ADDITION,\ y t.d s..err a d.ace�rw cha>mc Y q r"'may rt VeL+ M addtion t the GTy of Sourfioke.Torrent Canty.TeKae PAZ Secretory: ��'\ w' ra h -++....w _ or F the N.E THOMPSON SLRVEY.ABSTRACT No.663. a Z A e —•v „__ Accor&..E.t,,o the S�idar,recorded n APPROVED BY TEE CITY COUNCL S. 4Fe, r6�e W.ra.s 8ru Plm Recorreds.T ricers Comfy.Texas 10537 Acres �� 6 Ra'euy.Come.Vol.V84 Pg 452 —�+w MOO AA91A1.1 Mapermd y.2000 .2000 Aare:_ ..... «v.s— _,p..s _ T�ar� Mayor, Lot 6 Lor G Lot p ~ ZA o0-o55 tr BIERAIJ) TATES .BLOCK L Vol�5.P9 48 City Secretary .Y]LZ 1 -, ... .._ ARIAnnlvatwc,nice —CH. iYiA i _ i'Lu(j City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT June 16, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 99-112 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat- Easter Plaza STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza on property legally described as Tracts 2A 1 A, 2A2A, 11, and 11 E situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract 474, and being approximately 32.6 acres. PURPOSE: Preliminary plat is required in order to final plat. The primary purpose of this plat is to allocate right-of-way for extension of Nolen Drive. There are no development plans for adjoining properties at this time. LOCATION: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709) approximately 650' west of Crooked Lane. OWNERS: Roger G. Williams; E. C. White; Michael and Leah Sathre; Dean Shanklin; and Richard Shanklin. APPLICANT: Caddy Property Management CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "SF-IA" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential and Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-seven (27) RESPONSES: Four (4) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Dick and Dean Shanklin, 2627 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, TX, in favor, "This new road will solve the problem of the intersection of Crooked Lane and FM 1709. It will also add road frontage to many properties." (Received November 29, 1999.) • Charles and Margaret Wood, 2350 Crooked Lane, Southlake, TX, opposed. "This area is surrounded by homes. I would have to have a lot more information about what is going to be done with the plat." (Received December 6, 1999.) • Jack Lovette, Gen Cap Partners (Southlake Cornerstone Business Park) 13154 Coit Road, Suite 102, Dallas, TX, in favor, See attached letter. (Received March 22, 2000.) City of Southlake, Texas • Darrell Faglie (SPIN #7 Representative) See attached letter. (Received April 27, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: December 9, 1999; Approved(7-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 17, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. February 17, 2000; Approved(5-0)the applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the March 23, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. March 23, 2000; Approved(6-0)to table at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing to the May 4, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. May 4, 2000; Approved (5-0) to table at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 8, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. June 8, 2000; Approved (4-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000, and to delete Items #1 (proper zoning requirement) and#3.a (5' utility easement). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-112PP.doc SF-}— 2,2000 01:57 GENCAP PARTNERS 918174889370 NO.614 DO3 Ge tC_apJ artners—LV MemoNO Jty City of CVutteeee Planning and Zoning Commission i.w,.. !ace t ovelte nenCee Partners 972-671-9120 Re: Reference No.:ZA yd-i i 2 • We loch te comment on the'referenced application for the Preliminary Plat of Easter Plaza. While we generally favor the proposed;plat due to the fact the Nolen Drive right-of-way will be dedicated, we still have several major concerns. 1) We want assuranc that ! necessaryrtcri f Cr ked P&Z wi! take all steps to ensure teat the p�,���r C. .,t�....-.. Boulevard) rd) la able to abandoned Lane(extending from current Nolen Drive to Souiniaa<e c�util6va+�,.a a�+� �� be w..........••-... uponYht_ d l d rang that ell utilities eerreetly completion of the No+en Drive eXtentiiOri This vYvuiu include r£yut,tt,y .. telephone r ilber optic nnPs be relocated to Nolen cunning along Crooked %.an8, hiuuui�ry any �orcr�wt�v :.• t,..,., •,r.._ , Drive. Grecked is na,, w maintained. and has a dangerous acute intersection with VIWnc� ypi�v poorly cceth!-,ke r ee!everd. It would be in everyone's best interest to have this road closed as soon as VVM N.I4"Y ,rv�•v -� - remeiete 2) We are concerned about the applicants (Caddy Property Management) appefet i inauility to, fend the construction for Nolen Drive. We have spoken witn all property owners in+Vo ed with the application and none hove indicated that they will contributes 1nanrcially to the read cost"union aside from dedicating right-of-way. Unless there hee been, recent developments, Caddy has been unable to state to us how funding wiii be aceomµiie-au. if Nolen Drive is not comple-tied in a timely manner, we want assurance that the City of Soutteake tin place this protect on its Capital Improvement Program. We wiii immediately step ,�r and r.�.... project understand tat the plates for Gateway Playa Addition Phase II will include extending Nolen Drive inorthward to c N-114. This plan will essentially"lock in"the south leg alignment for Nolen Drive. wtu tnuty v•.- I 3) The timingfor completion of Nolen Drive is becoming more critical. The new school stadium will � � o__ n non CC add significantly to the traffic on Crooked Lane. Comercis has just moved into their 33,003 .tit space at 500 Nolen Drive. They plan to have 250 employees there within the next sev£rol months Myan Plaza is constructing their 1te334 SF office building on S icon Dive nddi onally GenCap s where buyers are planning to a total of will close on four lots over the next srivdicri weeks wttot� ,..,y,.t...-�..,-�.-•�• ••,� construct indu • ct The nemancts placed on Crooked lane due to 84,665 $F of office and light uryuS�rBl p,.„d;:,.,. these events will only and to congoe ion and Safety cone. rn5. •Pagel RED'D MAR 2 2 2.000 BF-3 26 April, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Southlake do Planning Department 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: ZA 99-112, Nolen Drive Dear Sirs: As the Spin 7 Representative, I would like to take this opportunity to present input to the Commission concerning pending case ZA 99-112. ZA 99-112 and the completion of Nolen Drive from it's current point of intersec- tion with Crooked Lane to intersect with F.M. 1709 has been discussed at several Spin Meetings (both Spin 7 and city-wide) and at a local neighborhood meeting arranged by the applicant. These meetings revealed no opposition from the residents of Spin 7 or the City in general to the completion of Nolen Drive as described within the proposal pre- sented in ZA 99-112. Respectfully, Darrell Faglie SPIN #7 Representative h: (817) 488-7171 m: (817) 475-5070 f: (817) 481-2369 e-mail: DFaglie(a�aol.com RECD Pa 2 7 2000 SF-t( City of Southlake, Texas Tract Map ZA99-112 11 r . _ _ v , , , .,. .. . .____ ,, _ 1 I_7/ 1- lIii fr.,.,_7 \s. 1 - __SH ,,4 I_ _ __—_ --I — II kil/i i___ N -- - ii .-\ 1 "-TA /,, 11.9 >CO '':-_...*,\\\ c — -,4 I. ,,,i0 :/, \ ' 7 -VI- ----- --iL _ __ _____.--.) -_ _CL�:�- -- ®w Ll_ f-L- - 2000 0 2000 Feet N A ..........W � � E S SF-5 City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA99-112 y I 'rIr yrrus rra9 I I I litirir spry 3 ■ zAk- 28 29 _11 IBM iikater 25 - 51111 mail 24 / 7 =. 8 7 MEI . IMO 9 21 ' 10 11111 20 19 ° U. 18 016 A13 �1il ' i 3.Bill' j ...... 1s I... �7 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage I. C.Hong 1. "C-2" 1. Mixed Use I. 1.753 acres 2. G.Harrell 2. "AG" 2. Mixed Use 2. 2.94 acres 3. D.Perry 3. "AG" 3. Mixed Use 3. 2.62 acres 4. B.Gordon 4. "AG" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 1.525 acres 5. J.Demlow 5. "AG" 5. Retail Commercial 5. 2.493 acres 6. Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 6. "AG" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 0.414 acres 7. Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 7. "0-1" 7. Office Commercial 7. 2.78 acres 8. Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 8. "O-I" 8. Office Commercial 8. 1.48 acres 9. Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 9. "0-1" 9. Office Commercial 9. 1.472 acres 10.Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 10."0-1" 10.Office Commercial 10. 1.53 acres 11.Southlake Cornerstone Bus Pk 11."0-1" I I.Office Commercial 11. 1.571 acres 12.K.Shafer 12."SF-1A" 12.Low Density Residential 12. 1.495 acres 13.B.Struempler 13."SF-IA" 13.Low Density Residential 13.2.00 acres 14.J.Beech 14."SF-1A" 14.Low Density Residential 14. 1.891 acres 15.M.Kendrick 15."SF-IA" 15.Low Density Residential 15. 1.002 acres 16.D.Roberts 16."SF-1A" 16.Low Density Residential 16.2.15 acres 17.C.Wood 17."SF-1A" 17.Low Density Residential 17.2.33 acres 18.T.Fox 18."SF-1A" 18.Low Density Residential 18.2.50 acres 19.D.Faglie 19."SF-1A" 19.Low Density Residential 19.4.00 acres 20.J.Wang 20."SF-1A" 20.Low Density Residential 20.4.00 acres 21.C.Johnson 21."SF-1A" 21.Low Density Residential 21.4.00 acres 22.G.Thompson 22."SF-IA" 22.Low Density Residential 22.4.00 acres 23.T.Thompson 23."SF-1A" 23.Low Density Residential 23.4.00 acres 24.C.Po 24."SF-1A" 24.Low Density Residential 24.4.00 acres 25.Georgetown Monticello Prtn. 25."C-2" 25.Retail Commercial 25. 1.554 acres 26.Downey Enterprises LLC 26."C-2" 26.Retail Commercial 26.0.92 acres 27.Sterling Properties JV 27."C-2" 27.Retail Commercial 27. 1.737 acres 28.Georgetown Monticello Prtn 28."C-2" 28.Retail Commercial 28.0.84 acres 29.Park Monticello Ltd. 29."C-2" 29.Retail Commercial 29.2.52 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\99Exhibits\99112PP.doc Sf 'p Caddy Property 22 November 1999 Management City of Southlake Attn: Planning Department 1721 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 100 Southlake. Texas 76092 Dear Sirs: This letter is written in response to Comment 1, Plat Review Summary, Case Number ZA 99-112, dated 11/15/99. This Preliminary Plat Submittal presents a comprehensive plan for the extension of Nolen Drive from Crooked Lane to a point of intersection with Southlake Boulevard. In the opinion of the applicant and the co-signors of this Submittal, this plan represents the optimal alignment of Nolen Drive south of Southlake Boulevard. All associated parties recognize the requirement for alignment of Nolen Drive on both sides of Southlake Boulevard. Considerable effort has been expended in communication with parties involved in development on the north side of Southlake Boulevard to assure awareness of those parties of the inten- tions and interests of the property owners and associated parties to the south. For information pertinent to development of Nolen Drive north of Southlake Boulevard. please contact: Mr. Terry Wilkinson Southlake Properties, Inc. (817) 329-4599 It is the full intention of all persons party to this submittal to cooperate fully with the City in final selection of the alignment which best serves both the majority of the affected property owners and the greater good of the citizens of Southlake. Thank you very much for all of your work in review of this Submittal. Respectf . c__ __,((..._Th Max rugl r CC: Terry Wilkinson, Southlake Properties, Inc. E.C. White Roger Williams Mike Sathre Leah Sathre Richard Shanklin Dean Shanklin s -i Caddy Prccerty Management • P.O. Box 92848 • Southlake,TX 76092 • (817)329-1635 • Fax: (817)488-7205 City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 99-112 Review No: Three Date of Review: 03/17/00 Project Name: Preliminary Plat—Lots 1 - 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 -4, Block 2, Easter Plaza, being 32.6 acres out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No 474 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Caddy Property Management JDJR Engineers and Consultants, Inc. 2834 Market Loop#100 2505 Texas Drive, Suite 109 Southlake, TX 76092 Irving, TX 75062 Phone: (817) 329-1635 Phone: (972) 252-5357 Fax: (817) 488-7205 Attn: Max Krugler Fax: (972) 273-8860 Attn: Jim Dewey Jr. CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/31/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. The proposed location of this street does not conform to that shown on the approved location indicated in the Village Center East Study. The approved location for this through connection is to the east of the location shown. NOTE:It appears this location of the proposed Nolan Drive aligns with the proposed continuation of the street on the north side, as shown on the Preliminary Plat for Gateway Plaza, Phase 2, currently being reviewed by staff. See the enclosed letter from Wyndham Properties, the north side developer/property owner. 1. No plat shall be approved until proper zoning embracing this property shall be approved and duly adopted by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 4.01 C. The property is currently zoned "AG" and no proper zoning is proposed at this time. (Variance Requested) 2. All lots must meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The current lots do not comply with the "AG" district regulations. With the exception of the proposed right-of-way dedication, prior to processing a Final Plat, a change of zoning to an appropriate zoning district must be approved by the City. 3. The following changes are needed regarding easements: a. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 5' U.E. along the east and north perimeters of Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 1. The applicant proposes relocating these utility easements adjacent to the street right-of-way, along Nolan Drive which may save trees. Staff concurs with this relocation. (Variance needed) b. Provide easements as required by the Public Works Department. 1 City of Southlake, Texas * A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old red courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For more information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at(817) 884-1103. * It appears this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Additionally, the "Avigation Easement and Release" shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Max Kruegler, Caddy Property Management VIA FAX: ABOVE JDJR Engineers and Consultants, Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\99\99112PP3 Easter Plaza.doc 2 SF- 1 Wyndham Properties, Ltd. 751 E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 130 Southlake,TX 76092 (817)329-4599 (817)488-2420 Fax January 12, 2000 Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 1721 E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Nolen Drive between F.M. 1709 and Highway 114 Dear Karen: We are working on development plans for the property west of Gateway Plaza, north of F.M. 1709, and south of State Highway 114. It is our intention to turn in a zoning and concept plan request on that property later this month. This concept plan encompasses the land north of the proposed Nolan Drive intersection, and will also provide for the continuation of Nolan Drive north from F.M. 1709 thru to the State Highway 114 service road. We are aware of the pending Zoning Case ZA 99-112, and have received and reviewed the plans for the proposed alignment of Nolen Drive south of F.M. 1709. This alignment is compatible with our concept plan, and we are incorporating that proposed alignment in our layouts. Sin ly, . 2./4......- erry L. Wilkinson Wyndham Properties Ltd. SF-to o to CO--' eo-- boa 400 ' LEGAL DESCRiP HON ' 1141.11$ELVER NO C% _—� 1� 1 ,.•.0,..•.o. a• ,n•n... r a—ri..n..�..n+c, wr.,rrr r.e.w r�...rn.w ra r rr... tea•• �-.` wee .•,r..n.w! ^,o.'w•SCALE. /'ep• 1T. .•—•» w•fn.a Yi wo..e• awr rcY ♦-.r..r., iw L. �4``Aro SITE i c s.,rr.... .....rw w>„,w.«..u..1.s.•..ne w•...•r•ew.•RT..„r r_.,,.,.. WNON u+•r•n... naa.a.arc, •". •+r.v..�.un.•..,.r., ... ds r .r..•.rs....r.e.....rvwrmeltiwr.....,...... NORTH • ,•••••`/ x0xss r] 7 w sttr. ;»•«e ar,..vwr s.wr r..wr.....r raw,IT'...°w,r w.....�....••r...y w.�`Y r..u.wr......r • .11 /1/ ...a...447.6. rw Yaws ',a 3I w aw.....^we.,... 77. ....La.r w.we...• Iro.0 I _ _Yr wew.~ �.. pa. LOI .,'X`"' ......�... • g�if ...�.n. ; r..•n..� / rr..ra ww................ai w-w w c ... . erw -.r-.rR r..r i..«r....a as m rr r.....i a �•x A !{ "�+sw�fa aes n.Ae Sr.•a ra.wem.er•..rr.•awe.a am rn ea•*11r w..: coo am at ,..�...r-s i' /y,'T .a.rn..',..aK, ...... / 5.,..r.....„..,..^m •.� IF rwr ...._. ss CC • w ,rr•.0 a = '�/`F7 - r.e X..\;\ • s.w,so a r.,...�r.•as..w.r.r r..«�...w�...a r..r�...r r r..s,,. •y /a@ 5 oi.r a� .ar-n wrtr \. •••«¢—•�• `\ BLKA'. �••v •••m,win m�.w r.r r.s.r......r�maxn r..r�r,.... Lo O/(,r ..\ 246.94•a rou. �iv r t''.=, 7\ > ••••�•• CO/ 'a'N S ao0'2J'24"W S 7j 245oJ. w LOT 3 YI >d •\ `omens.rW•..o ARK aoa. zs `VV 7J��5 59�6.36"E 34 J W BLOCK 1 '�$F o ,�i .a..'w `A 40.65• ......11�'�' 4 `\ ,..�,,.. s.,.m ...a.,.wrn m..�rr i....r....a a.o m wr.......5. 11400 N. "a- u, o..awa .'2 s� LOT 1 �LL i c+ ,.+:� �\ w rw...ran.....,. .a..n r.•«r..•, ss re.•a••..,..—.w w.•...,w r..w•.....•.•.r BLOCK 1 LOT 2 -r__ w r..r r. rFs ' l m` ' ..,..rr«•.'.a r�Tr 0BLOCK 1�� t +'.''a'P s*\ SILICON-ORIVE__ ^�'� tea, \„ .,r v w wrl.:. --.y:,. w ! a - ' n -9�� s.,a..N r.r • '�"'�• '+''�`• e?\ s.«...w«•.w r. rn - ___ - 3 \ ' n„sg areLel r...,.w.::.er w w o,.,..r,....r.w,_.-a.w e....wr.......n.w..r ma A sum C^�. " ,r• w. yy,A. .,....�. a.. .w....,. / -, r = 'y; if -ram- .r. ..r...a.r..,» o y .tw r+•.,a°.. __--ISC4 TO BE 154R0 w As la a.,,.,•, ,\\. ....um.. w� Itmcz 5.... Ma..........,r, wr.r«w....y.•r..•.�....a asTIN. tiM�.w�r CS es B,, 9 �,- 4.1_, eon Or:aa:,:ncY MOW) a»aK . e 00... .lase... ... tJ�.'.� m - ,ig , 3'lf A• ."...'a."ar r LOT 1 LOT 2 r LOT 3 •\ * w a sn aa5 m• j c..a....c r.mee. �r.n...,.......�n. ��• `BLOCK 2 •:" BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2 W-•---�W PRELIMINARY PLAT • -.., 1J6.JS� ....�..�.... Fa ` ni �' m `\ b,' a ra a LOTS t THRU 3, BLOCK 1 8 LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 2 • a .s{'; �> EASTER PLAZA /' � °+ emu`.,, Y `y.•�,.•W~ .a,.::An...., AN ADDITION TO THE CI TY Of SOU tr��� AKE fo TARRANT TEXAS O..s O `\ __._�`;;_�,�-� ;1 �- y` S gRCLE 326 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, /� ��l ! WHISPERING WOOD m el_ an `N-O0'of 3r41 i/ 3S7.6T— _ '''• ABSTRACT Na 474 CO �• .'...r I�^� I. C u��• (^y a;, "c .\\ aARE A TOTAL OF 7 LOTS IN 3 r6 .. �d �I,_..I�.• wed n, ^ I w u:w. THERE 0 5 INCLUDED MiH THIS PLAT NoARr°wLNvaNs w••o.�.aa^ci LOT 4 \ ,.,r.a, A, cPsr PST.,,, ..<� �\ cr ,........._... FEBRUARY 2000 O -, a.rx m-. �:TY•.o."*r-. w,sa«"..' m BLOCK 2 J SCALE 1'=100' O �1 a s Sos'�_ �} r I ..mr.um. ...,..w..,..,,, ;\„ OYMERS: Cal `� �s S41.32535.+ �3 -- - --- N 0016..' ,•,,, - ---- - \• DEAN AND RICHARD SHANNUN ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS •-.I .�. I E . ISfi7.OP \ r.n[swFw,eo'tvNq oN,A vo 5 MT.1'm'1. . '�' __5 a sM = •t t ,..,..r p1.w.r ..•.�.....n.w .....Q......... ,....o.......... ...,.s Win... ...,..v.Win... ,.....,or.m.. TEL..a-ees-rrm rtL RIa-6x va,a r, a,rao ., / s ssw m'r nrn— 1!!! MICHAEL SATHRE•ETU%LEAH SATHRE E.C.MATE -z m -S s xe�s'm'. :Lt. 4.2400.o.•w llel C soum ci L13 5 soon5"+ rsx.1V , _ _ _... Sou MA•,BPA,vuW - ••'a..•.cr sw.r,w=.TEXAS 76002v,ep n .� / 5 x'ef9S+ s .' xPLR MOOT - -•• a,oz m -s- x RI.o6-xea-�axo.a 2 .r6 5 n7sas + a5 po' rtvdrv[o nK. ^'E°R4PLcry cPrT.w,u w ws q.r wz NOT •y .vw..�w APPLICANT: i7A 99-11,w'�' .� OUANni.n,.£LAND USE SCHEDULE r u a CADDY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT IDIR�DC ,AS NO Gtl�A1MVf3,ICwiw CC O. 1 J ._ .c cs7ro, 5 are.Rxa. wM w. wX^. - - mi ewa.ulo n.s. a. . r:\JUJHPROJ\1999\157\157-PCP2.DWG Mon Jan 31 13.05 37 2000 JDJR Engineers 6Consultants, Inc * JDJR Z )-J3 ill, i=3 ;:_ .. rM s 01 ::cC^cc iq§ \ xy / d .E A9 �aeeq:Yes "="y"$b Q 1 4✓,7'/ ' II. s4' El e 8 g / a 83B SSSSBA6$ a- i "° ` a„'. __� zgliwo0 , g C,,?, __, 1,; 7;r•il % of ;1 441,0t 4 ae;0. ii` ` ' ,.may /I ? Ct,. `be', '..-. a i 1 seas ' i 1,g;M1/� . $w "u' -.1 -� 454 it `\ �a• \ i__.__RZ.. i i I.,"•r is .p LE.. rvj ? Q.+,",. '•f` tF, r . \ e E a4 j �' .ar a e w?Y.-,I i \" ,\I `\.q o - . r;• r e 11 rE.,r II/ • $5 �— t,, • I ') q� t! i 1�� \)* \ '' \ \ . t' i, , rrr. 'tea 1f,' ,,,t I: , 8;: j°ib\ '` ti \ \ \ \ ` 4 . . 1 go :E! 1 /, ' c II - ' vial E41 ib r ..Or E \ \ \-•.. i or` i¢ , E /... ., ii. \ — 1 \ \ \ 70 pI \ ley. Q ai. 1-,, j if b 1t I ��/ \ ♦♦ 1 '• .4M C g s of ) �`� No�♦� >y�� QQ i C •...,, : ( I 41 \Iiiit `� J44 4 e`er F �' \. ! .'i-/ ; iiv 1 i /' --- ' i // / iilli: 11 li i al II ; ilf '4 i iq i i i ire; ;;! , i y • / / 0 9 R „r . i:6 * § g /E sIy g , -- / a iJ:. r] _1 T H F—i N 4 g R I E n �ai�$ PROJECT. LOTS 1 THflU 3, BLOCK 1 8 y L d , g f z 2;. LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 2 j )DJ R jENG1�EBS 6 CONSULTANTS,NC. - s. maw 1 A i EASTER PLAZA i.*, ENGIEBi3• LAM PLANERS. CAODEsr11s e �� , N.) 6 -C a Tux.o..PO MI e v rwx* s � IP I.mfStaA too w mxmro ;; /; Lai .Lon. T ';; .b•.a asrt••o.rl4 mrrs assrt•NO.,. .2'''''- .,, SITE 1 - lII I I rr r•.m ua r sun,r> NINON I I $g 11, 12 ,It :::I/, NORTH cs F. . IA i I Xi/ •..aG. '"':.a of s 1 E a /ll ROOlS 6 .O 100 206 .W Ni E I cc r i .r / / s \ .Lao07 s .a •. 6j,q .. f I ura 1 w rrl wr,rr I >y .Laas �� iE .Y',CI. -'. ./ oar[:27."'":". r.a. C a \ + MOd>3i —. fi,h'ili _---—....,eg.44-44,4\,'',, t,4`-', : •,, s ,„ •.4; snoz.'zr,w--rTy dal• ke ..,(•'9T 3 _,/;�::,•�,. °wm.;.°' a\ ca.. la.E s:..,. rao<. C y '� / 597836"E ,3 .i .Loa l 0 ou>a h �/ aQ65' C"_^dJ3�3�ti�. s �,-' b ell a.., M .4�. .ar / t 1 ,as7•t a. `. ca 1V;') -Ass,_ n a /,i I K 1 a Jidc♦ r� ��. \ V V Q '^ \`etV LOT 2 .. "�... s`r -SILICON DRIVE----I - 0_1 N 02 , 'F4 ,. ?7,i 6 BLOCK 1 P , ,\ .ors,x . J 11, "1 •.,o 7/,4�,r' ..w'>....m t.NM � j + s r+s `.�css:°"sw m m J r'o o K �1/ ,t,�...••+,..., ,<..-:la_ �' .- -. ._ \ .. soil aaal =_� ,, .\___ .T.r.;Ar ak------ . . G a� / 1/i�J1f yy t ..�nrdt.\jf� rry °m"Y`°"a T... ,�jailT;Ir -- ',,r>N.�" ,_, *��r' �� ... (/)GE 9. 4. C7 /3 ;p�l 1p Iai tt."1 w,c, r '^ , --.� ,..r 1 us MD 0 J o ,/I2I .e .�...� OTy1 _% / LOT-4 3 `�\.. l>. ti II d I ' r„. --) i 7"2 / pLOCK 2 �� BL-OCK3_..' ,! . ` I // % / / yam` : , , ,nwr.1.> as i _ /// - z i` \J •. '1 •��.. `\ SPERWOLO S CIRCLE /'�/ y ill" =�f idi'/-i' .-'V 1 7 '\\ ,\ I II '�o\• W ii, ;` ..>a •. ...a . W/! __/ �.._.._. - I , l ;.:.r I.k1.s ai�aaa•.ADDS. r m. ._1j ,w >,a m -'- = ..- ' BLOCK �'t,• BWNOuax OwCNSOnS _ .' I ... 2 P mu • ^ 31 sWELDON.n„os"• um � - -`.— rw - - .....,, ; a .\'.� PRELIMINARY .� s2u2 w-r• MOT / ; I ....- - N00'I6.•; E .,,�„ 1567.0' `� tor• SANITARWATER Y .n. ' s�i'erm•� .Isla' ,/ �j' SEWER PLAN is s rv'os-• .Kr II / /I / 1 \s\ •ti TS SOIS.S`• .4.36 \ wi[m-2s-ss n u s uvrm•• m m won. 0sao•OM rswmrs�a• scut r-Im 31 >. 32..•• lass' 4 nw'as•• x c our a nn araat I sMnos-• nsr 7 .3 .SbS'• 24230' CHM aMt nw 1.12 S 23V • a SVS- 1la, L LA S r'.i.05'• — slur.. 7 .r sss2xm•• maa .o.a PECD JAN 31 2000 2 113141116 11,-3-. R ! City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 13, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext. 757) SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, amending Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and the length of terms Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, amending Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and the Southlake City Code, Section 12-77, revising the number of board members and the length of terms. Background • Information: Ordinance No. 646 and Section 12-77 of the City of Southlake City Code states the following: "The board shall consist of nine citizens of the city, and who shall be appointed by the city council for three-year terms. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the board shall be numbered one through nine." Currently there are eight (8) active board members, and with the recent expiration of two (2) board members terms, discussions have begun on the potential to reduce the number of board members from nine (9) to seven (7) members, and reducing the length of terms from three (3) years to two (2) years. A•seven (7) member Board would be consistent with the other City Boards. - The proposed ordinance reduces the terms of new appointments on or after June 1, 2000 to two (2) years. However, the City Council may wish to consider one appointment per Resolution No. 00-57 (Agenda Item 9F) to be made for one (1) year. This would result in three (3) places expiring in 2001, and four (4)places expiring in 2002. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable. • Legal Review: Not Applicable. Alternatives: Alternatives include the following: • Revisions to Ordinance No. 646 and the Southlake City Code, Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77, "Park and Recreation Board" as desired. • 861. r Billy Campbell, City Manager June 13, 2000 page 2 Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Exhibit A, copy of Ordinance No. 646-B with changes shown as highlighted, strikeout. • Exhibit B, copy of strikethrough version of Southlake City Code Section 12-77, "Number of board members, qualifications, and terms." This exhibit highlights the proposed revisions to the City Code. Staff Recommendation: Place as an item on the June 20, 2000 City Council agenda to consider City Ordinance No. 646-B, 1st Reading, revising Ordinance No. 646, "Park and Recreation Board," and the Southlake City Code, Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77, revising the number of members and length of terms. • • • • 86'Z EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 646-B AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 646, "PARK AND RECREATION BOARD," AND SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE, SECTION 12-77, REVISING THE NUMBER OF PARK BOARD MEMBERS AND THE LENGTH OF TERMS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of park improvements and recreation programs; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Youth Parks and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the Park and Recreation Board relating to recreation programs and park improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to prohibit certain types of conduct within city parks; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. Creation of the Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Board." Section 2. Number of Board Members, Qualifications and Terms. The Board shall consist of nine (9) citizens seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for three (3) year terms two (2)year terms, effective beginning with appointments made on or after June 1, 2000. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through nine (9)seven (7). The city council in making the appointments to the Board, shall give due consideration to the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Park and Recreation Board. The City Council if it deems it desirable, may appoint ex officio members to the board. In addition, the chairperson of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall serve as an ex officio member of the board. Such ex officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of office of such ex officio members shall begin on January 1 St of each year and end on December 31 St of that year. Such ex officio members shall have no voting authority for park and recreation matters. Vacancies on the board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. Section 3. Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held on the second Monday of each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the City Secretary or the Chairman of the Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Board shall be reported to the City Council which may, at its discretion,remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 4. Board Duties and Responsibilities. The duties and responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Board shall be to: a. Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation including development of long range capital improvements programs. b. Cooperate with other City boards and commissions, other governmental agencies, civic groups, and all citizens of the city in the advancement of sound park and recreation planning and programming. c. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. d. Recommend programs for development of recreational areas, facilities and improved recreation services. e. Recommend the adoption of standards for recreational areas, facilities and their financial support. f. Review an annual report of existing park and recreation programs and services. g. Review the annual budget of the park and recreation programs prior to submission to the City Council and submit a recommendation on the budget. Section 5. Creation of a Youth Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Youth Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Youth Board." Section 6. Number, Qualifications and Terms. • a. The Youth Board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who must be students enrolled in school in grades seven through twelve. The Park and Recreation Board shall appoint members for two (2) year terms. The Board shall appoint the members using the following procedure: N:I Parks&Recreation I BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr31Or o.646-B.doc2 (1).Interested persons meeting the qualifications shall submit an application to the Director of Parks and Recreation. (2).An interview committee, comprised of four members, one Park and Recreation Board member, one member of City staff, as appointed by the Park and Recreation Director, one Board member of the Southlake Park Development Corporation, and one member of the Youth Park Board, shall review the applications and conduct interviews if appropriate. (3).The committee shall make recommendations for members to the Park and Recreation Board, ensuring an even distribution among the age of the applicants. b. The Board shall appoint members who shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. c. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through seven (7). Vacancies shall be. filled in the same manner provided for regular appointments. In making the initial appointments, the Parks and Recreation Board shall appoint four (4) members of the Youth Board for two-year terms and three members for one-year terms. Section 7. Youth Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Youth Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Youth Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held once each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the Director of Park and Recreation or the Chairman of the Youth Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Youth Board shall be reported to the Park and Recreation Board which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Youth Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 8. Duties of the Youth Park and Recreation Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall be to: • a. Act in an advisory capacity to the Park and Recreation Board in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation, including development of long range capital improvement programs. b. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. gq,c1. N:•IParks&RecreationlBOARDSICCI20001Qtr3IOrdNo.646-B.doc3 c. Recommend youth-related programs for development of recreational facilities, areas and improved recreation services. d. Prepare and submit to the Park and Recreation Board an annual review of youth- related parks and recreation programs and services. Section 9. Definitions. a. Alcoholic Beverage shall be defined to include any alcohol and any beverage containing more than one-half (1/2) of one percent of alcohol by volume which is capable of use for beverage, either alone or when diluted. b. City park shall be defined to be any park, playground or recreational area owned, leased, operated or under the control of the City of Southlake. This definition shall include any athletic field, swimming pool, gymnasium, tennis court, and other similar facility owned by the Carroll Independent School District and specified in the joint- use agreement between Carroll Independent School District and the City of Southlake. Section 10. Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or consume any alcoholic beverage in any city park. Section 11. Riding or Driving Horses in City Park. Except on designated horse trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride a horse or horses within any city park. Section 12. Riding or Driving Off-Road Vehicles in City Park. Except on designated off-road trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride an off-road vehicle within any city park. For the purposes of this section, an off-road vehicle is a vehicle designed and equipped for use of any paved roadway with such definition to specifically include off-road motor bikes, go-carts, and dune buggies. Section 13. Vehicular Traffic Prohibited in Certain Areas. Except in designated • overflow parking areas, it shall be unlawful for any motor vehicle to stand, stop, park or cross onto or into any portion of a city park other than upon a roadway or parking area so designated for such purposes. Section 14. Time limitations on Public Use of Park. Except for a city sponsored event, it shall be unlawful for any person to use, enter into or be within a city park during any posted hours which the park is closed. Section 15. Littering. Littering is hereby prohibited in any city park. Littering shall include leaving trash or other items by persons picnicking within a city park and not placing trash and other items in appropriate trash receptacles provided in such park. Section 16. Firearms Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry on or • about himself or to discharge a gun, pistol, rifle, or other firearm within any city park except that a person duly licensed by the State of Texas to carry a concealed handgun may carry a concealed handgun in accordance with State Law. N:IParks&Recreation1BOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc4 Section 17. Rollerblading prohibited except in designated areas. It shall be unlawful for any person to use rollerblades on tennis courts and other posted areas in any city park. Section 18. Hitting Golf Balls Prohibited. Except in designated areas, it shall be unlawful for any person to hit golf balls in city parks. Section 19. Smoking Prohibited Except in Designated Areas. It shall be unlawful to smoke in bleachers, dugouts, or other congested outdoor areas at city parks. Section 20. Bicycling Prohibited in Certain Areas. It shall be,unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle on other than an improved vehicular road or path designated for that purpose. A bicyclist shall be permitted to wheel or push a bicycle by hand over any grassy areas or wooded trail or on any paved area reserved for pedestrian use only. Section 21. Glass Containers Prohibited in City Park. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a glass container in a city park. Section 22. Variances. The City Manager may issue special permits or grant variances to the provisions of this ordinance. The Southlake Park and Recreation Board will make recommendations regarding variances to the City Manager. A special permit variance shall not be granted by the City Manager unless a written request is submitted which demonstrates: a. Special circumstances exist which are peculiar to the applicant's ability to utilize city parks; and b. That use of the city park by other groups or individuals will not be adversely affected by granting the special permit variance. Section 23. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 515 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 24. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Section 25. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects, or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. N:•IParks& Recre-ation1BOARDSICC12000IQtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc5 Section 26. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 515 or any other ordinances affecting city parks which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 27. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 28. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 9ce N:I Parks&Recreation 1 BOARDSI CC12000I Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doc6 . EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 76 N:IParks& Recreation IBOARDSI CC120001 Qtr3lOrdNo.646-B.doe7 . EXHIBIT B Proposed Revisions to the Southlake City Code, Chapter 12, Article 3, Section 12-77 Sec. 12-77. Number of board members, qualifications, and terms. The board shall consist of nine seven citizens of the city, and who shall be appointed by the city council for three two-year terms, effective beginning with appointments made on or after June 1, 2000. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the board shall be numbered one throughe seven. • ag N:IParks&Recreation1BOARDSICC120001Qtr31OrdNo646-B ExhibitA.doc . ` 4 City of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 16, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 787, 1st Reading, Abandonment of a permanent utility easement on State Highway 114, Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition Action Requested: Abandon a permanent utility easement along SH 114 on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition Background Information: Several easements were required to install sanitary sewer and water improvements along the south side of SH 114 from N. Kimball to Gateway Plaza, Phase 1. The sewer and water improvements were required to relocate existing facilities that were in conflict with the SH 114 reconstruction. The water and sewer improvements have been constructed. The water and sewer improvements crossed the tracts of properties that make-up Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 (see project map). Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 is currently in the City's rezoning and platting process. The land Title Company handling the closing of the tracts of property discovered that the wrong property owner had inadvertently signed one of the easements. However, the easement was recorded with Tarrant County. In order to clear the title to the land, the easement must be abandoned. The rightful property owner is in the process of executing the required easement. Financial Consideratigns: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The easement is considered null and invalid since the rightful property owner did not grant it. The attorneys have recommended Council formally abandon the easement. This will create a clear title. Alternatives: None. 8H-1 City of Southlake, Texas Supporting Documents: Project map Ordinance No. 787 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council abandon a utility easement along SH 114 on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Kimball/1709 Addition. Please place this item on the June 20, 2000 City Council Agenda for approval. av\ SP/sep 8H-2 N-5 UTILITY EASEMENT PROJECT MAP _ l epASVl I 1 I I I 51 P1 g GREG 1 CGUN1 PGRES Easement to — be Abandoned Water & Sewer NORTHWEST P —__) Improvements KWY EAST F PRFtPR P _ �_� FMB PCP\ -‘-‘014 \\ 111 1109 . errlatit..... 1111 Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 -oullIgrib,,-'41cli k:. 1 4 1S 0 .p., i 1 _ loll irkil EAsrt 1 ,1 ! ... :: ._ No ,. immisir 0. b,N tt ! • 4) 1 1 1 8H-3 1 ORDINANCE NO. 787 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING AN EASEMENT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND CONTROL OF THIS EASEMENT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that an easement, located in the City of Southlake, is not being used by, nor is useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said easement, the city desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said easement to the owner of the abutting property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 An easement more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc(06/20/00) PAGE 1 8H-4 Accordingly, the above described easement is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and shall revert in fee simple to the owner of the abutting property. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed to releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the easement, on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3 A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the city council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc (06/20/00) PAGE 2 8H-5 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney m:\wd-files\cip\sewer\n-5 easement abandonment ord..doc (06/20/00) PAGE 3 8H-6 EXHIBIT "A" PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT POB STATE H W Y 114 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT CONCRETE MONUMENT 10.018 sq ft. 0. 230 acres N50.01 '21 "E N06.59'213"E 4.06 �` 10.03 135.00 S82.2�23"E —_ \ S82714811E148.181 N86'09 11 ,�500.11 '54"W 25.06 • " 86 77' 587.27'48"E 104.70'010—" # "4;AL „`� , N00•14 15 E . > ;; F.,, � aN qe ;<. .1 V.e ,-i , T 4 —� �,__3 12.09 N82• 5,...-, ,: _.4 e.:. 't _ '",_: _ ,4`=,=`� 1; 7p 4 134.6 T 88?65 23 W N87.27'48"W 255.67' S86'09 1 W , TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT co 2 _ -- — _ , itl— � KIMBALL / 1709 ADDITON ���� C .A.SLIDE 4552 I 525 LOT 5,BLOCK 1 I O F Not* ALL BEARINGS BASED ON STATE PUNE COORDINATES FROM THE TFY'S D.O.T. Pe y;e` o e`*ETf Ri +'F SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION °I,Eddie L.Cheatham of CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES.a Registered Professional EDDE L.CHEATHAM >m 00 100 Land Surveyor of the State of Texas,do hereby declare that the calculations, I I 4 2346 graphic depiction and legal descriptions of this survey were properly prepared !I'of s s‘o+0� under my personal supervision from an actual survey made on the ground. IN FEET ) CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES �' SURD AO a -- (/--4"----. L_--L-00 1 inch - 50 ft. 1601E.LAUMR BLVD SUTE 200 ARLNGTON,TEXAS 70011 Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.23443 cam 546-0696 Metro ce17)2e5-13630 EXHIBIT'B' Permanent Utility Easement 35' Temporary Construction Easement Being a 0.230 acre tract of land in the Samuel Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land. over, through, and across Lot 5 of the Kimball/1709 Addition,as shown on plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A,Slide 4552,(P.R.T.C.T.)and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a Texas D.O.T. concrete monument found in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114,said point being the northeast corner of said Lot 5; THENCE S 00° 11' 54"W,a distance of 25.06 feet to a point for a corner in the east property line of said Lot 5; THENCE S 86°09' 17"W,a distance of 134.63 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 87°27'48"W,a distance of 255.67 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 82° 25' 23" W, a distance of 88.65 feet to a point for a corner in the west property line of said Lot 5; THENCE N 00° 14' 15" E, a distance of 12.09 feet to a Texas D.O.T. concrete monument found for a corner in the west property line of Lot 5; THENCE N 50°01'21"E,a distance of 4.06 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE S 82°25'23"E,a distance of 86.77 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE S 87°27'48"E,a distance of 104.70 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 06° 59' 23" E, a distance of 10.03 feet to a point for a corner in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE S 87° 27' 48" E, a distance of 148.18 feet to a point for a corner in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114; THENCE N 86° 09' 17" E, a distance of 135.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing within these metes and bounds 0.230 acres or 10,018 square feet of land,more or less. G:1001.4 5014 50-LGL3-r.do c July 9,1999 4 8H-8 City of Southlake, Texas J MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-47,Appointment of a Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tern. Action Requested: The Mayor with approval of the City Council appoints a Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tern to serve a one (1) year term. Background: The Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake approved by the voters in a duly called Charter election held on April 4, 1987 set the structure for the City Council to operate. Article 2.07 of the Charter allows for the appointment of a Mayor Pro Tern who shall perform the duties of the Mayor in case of the absence or disability of the Mayor. The Charter was amended on January 21, 1995 in which Article 2.07 was amended to include the position of Deputy Mayor Pro Tem who shall perform the duties of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern in case of their absence or disability. The term of the Mayor Pro Tern and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem is one (1)year. According to the Charter the Mayor selects his choices and the action is approved by the City Council. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-47 Staff Recommendation: Appointment of a Mayor Pro Tern and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem to serve a one (1) year term expiring in May 2001. City of Southlake, Texas J RESOLUTION NO. 00-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MAYOR PRO TEM AND A DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 2.07 OF THE HOME RULE CHARTER; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas, A Home Rule Charter was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter election on April 4, 1987; and, 'Whereas, Article 2.07 of the Charter allows for the appointment of a Mayor Pro Tern who shall perform the duties of the Mayor in case of the absence or disability of the Mayor; and, Whereas, On January 21, 1995, a Charter Amendment Election was held in which Article 2.07 was amended to include the appointment of a Deputy Mayor Pro Tern who shall perform the duties of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern in case of the absence or disability of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern; and, Whereas, the term of office for the Mayor Pro Tem and the Deputy Mayor Pro Tern shall be one (1)year, according to Article 2.07; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. All the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council does hereby incorporate said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. Effective immediately, the Mayor has appointed,with the approval of the City Council, Councilmember , to serve as Mayor Pro Tern, who shall hold office for one (1) year; and Councilmember , to serve as Deputy Mayor Pro Tern,who shall also hold office for one (1) year. Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. City of Southlake, Texas f Resolution No. 00-47 Page two CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary M:\WP-FILES\Res-00-47-MayorProTem.doc 9/i-5 • City of Southlake, Texas " • MEMORANDUM • June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-53, Appointments to the Building Board of Appeals to Fill Expired Terms Action Requested: City Council appoint three members to serve on the Building Board of Appeals to serve two-year terms to expire May 2001. Background Building Board of Appeals (BBOA) enforces jurisdiction over substandard buildings, and hear and decide-appeals pursuant to the Building Codes of the City of Southlake. They inspect property and premises at reasonable hours, when required, in the discharge of the Board's responsibilities under the laws of the state of Texas and the city. They hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretation of technical provisions of the codes and ordinances of the City. • The Board is composed of five (5) members and two alternate members who shall serve in the absence of one or more regular members. Terms held by Kosse Maykus, Eddie Pierce and David Carpenter expired in May 2000. Two applications have been received for this board. Interviews were conducted on June 12`n Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-53 2) Applications from David Lambert and Eddie Pierce • Staff Recommendation: Appoint members to serve two year terms expiring May 2001. m:\WP-FILES\CITYSEC\RESOLU\00-53mendoc City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS; PROVIDING FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 622; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5, of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS. Ordinance No. 622, adopted by the City Council of Southlake, Texas, on September 6, 1994, outlines the appointments to the Building Board of Appeals; and, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 622 states the board shall be composed of five (5) members to be appointed by the City Council to serve two-year terms. In addition, the City Council shall appoint two alternate members who shall serve in the absence of one or more regular members. Members are appointed to places numbered 1 through 5 and alternate members shall be appointed to places numbered 6 and 7. Even numbered places expire in even numbered years and odd numbered places expires in odd numbered years. WHEREAS, currently Places 2, 4, and 6 have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The terms of members KosseMaykus, Eddie Pierce and David Carpenter (Alternate #1) have expired. Under this resolution, the following appointments are hereby made as allowed for in Ordinance No. 622. Place 2 to expire 5/2002 Place 4 to expire 5/2002 Place 7 Alternate #1 to expire 5/2002 Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage and approval by the City Council. 98-2 — City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 00-53 June 20, 2000 Page 2 of 2 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DUNE, 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary m:\wp-files\citysec\resolu\00-53BBOA.doc 9 -3 City of Southlake, Texas r MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-54, Appointments to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee Action Requested: City Council appoint three members to serve on the Joint Drug and Alcohol Awareness Board to fill two expired terms and one unexpired term. Background: Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee works to develop initiatives for drug and alcohol awareness. The 'Committee is comprised of the following members: two City Councilmembers, appointed by the City Council; two members from the Carroll ISD Board of Trustees, appointed by the school board; two members from the community-at-large, appointed by the City Council; two members from the community-at-large, appointed by the Carroll ISD Board of Trustees; two youth members from the community-at-large, appointed by the CISD superintendent or his designee. Currently, there is one appointment to be made to fill the Council position held by former Councilmember Debra Edmondson, one position to fill the expired term held by Councilmember Gary Fawks and the Council citizen-at-large position held by Brad Bartholomew. Only one application has been received for the citizen at-large-position, which is attached to this memo. Interviews were conducted on June 12t. • Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-54 2) Application from Brad Bartholomew Staff Recommendation: Make appointments to fill two council positions and the at large position. M:\WP-FILES\CITYSEC\RESOLU\00-54mem.doc 9c- I City of Southlake, Texas 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP INITIATIVES FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL AWARENESS TO FILL EXPIRED TERMS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the citizens of Southlake are confronted with the societal issue of drug and alcohol abuse among the youth of our community and desire to undertake a mutual effort to address this situation; and, WHEREAS, members are appointed from the following entities: two members from the City Council, appointed by the City Council; two members from the School Board, appointed by the School Board; two members from the community-at-large, appointed by the City Council; two members from the community-at-large, appointed by the Carroll ISD Board of Trustees; two youth members appointed by the Southlake Youth Action Commission; and two youth members from the community-at-large, appointed by the CISD Superintendent or his designee; and, WHEREAS, currently terms have expired for Southlake City Council appointee Gary Fawks and Council appointee citizen-at-large Brad Bartholomew. Also, a replacement is needed to fill the unexpired term occupied by former councilmember Debra Edmondson as a Council appointed member, with a term to expire May 2001. Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints: Place 1 City Council appointee Expires 5/2001 Place 2 City Council appointee Expires 5/2001 Place 6 Council citizen-at-large Expires 5/2001 Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council.. City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 00-54 June 20, 2000 Page 2 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 206 DAY OF JUNE 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ATTEST: Mayor Rick Stacy Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary M:\WP-FILES\CITYSEC\RESOLU\00-54Drug&AI.DOC CI 33 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-55, Appointments to the Joint Utilization Committee (JUC) Action Requested: City Council appoints two members to the Joint Utilization Committee. A Councilmember appointee and a Citizen-At-Large Appointee, for a two (2) year term. Background: The City Council formed a Joint Utilization Committee (JUC) to work with the City and Carroll ISD staff in developing and implementing joint use projects. The JUC has established "Policies and Procedures" which stated the committee consist of at least five (5) members: two (2) appointed by the Southlake City Council, one (1) of which shall be a member of City Council; two (2) members appointed by the Carroll ISD Board of Trustees, one (1) of which shall be a member of the CISD Board of Trustees; and one (1) representative from the Parks and Recreation Board as selected by the Chair of the Board. On June 10, 1999, the JUC board approved amending their "Policies and Procedures" pertaining to membership to allow a second Southlake City Councilmember to be appointed to the board. Currently the terms have expired for a Council appointee (Gary Fawks) and a citizen-at-large appointee (Wendi Carlucci). Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-55 2)Applications City of Southlake, Texas p RESOLUTION NO. 00-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE JOINT UTILIZATION COMMITTEE (JUC); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, formed a Joint Utilization Committee (JUC)to work with City and Carroll ISD staff in developing and implementing joint use projects; and, WHEREAS,JUC "Policies and Procedures" established that the committee consist of at least five(5)members;two (2) appointed by Southlake City Council, one (1) of which shall be a member of City Council; two (2) members appointed by Carroll ISD Board of Trustees, one of which shall be a member of the CISD Board of Trustees; and one(1) representative from the Parks and Recreation Board a selected by the Chair of the Board; and, WHEREAS, on June 10, 1999,the JUC board approved amending their"Policies and Procedures" pertaining to membership to allow a second Southlake City Councilmember to be appointed to the board; and, WHEREAS,the terms have expired for a City Council appointee(Gary Fawks) and a citizen-at-large appointee(Wendi Carlucci); NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of the resolution as if copied in there entirely. Section 2. The City Council desires to appoint the following members to serve on the Joint Utilization Committee: Councilmember Appointee Citizen-At-Large Appointee Section 3. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. 91)-0? City of Southiake, Texas r Resolution No. 00-55 Page two CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary M:\WP-FILES\RESOLUTERES-00-55-JUC.doc City of Southlake, Texas A MEMORANDUM • June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-56, Appointments to the Library Board Action Requested: Consider Resolution No. 00-56, naming new members to the Southlake Library Board. Background Information: On October 20, 1998, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, approved Ordinance No.716, establishing a Library Board to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of library facility planning and programming. The Ordinance establishes that the board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for two (2) year terms, provided three (3) members shall be appointed each odd-numbered year and four (4) members be • appointed each even-numbered year. Members shall serve without compensation until their successors are appointed. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through seven (7). Currently the terms for Places 1, 2, and 3 have expired. C.D. Peebles, Marjorie Zielke and Debbie Baynard have all reapplied for appointment to a second term. Their first term was for one (1) year. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-56 City of Southlake, Texas 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINT- MENT OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE LIBRARY BOARD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, On October 20, 1998, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, approved Ordinance No. 716, establishing a Library Board to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of library facility planning and programming; and, WHEREAS, The Board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council or two (2) year terms, provided three (3) members shall be appointed each odd-numbered year and four (4) members be appointed each even-numbered year. Members shall serve without compensation until their successors are appointed. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1)through(7); and, WHEREAS, The City Council may appoint ex-officio members to the Board. Such ex-officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of the office of such ex-officio members shall be one year from the date of appointment. Such ex- officio members shall have no voting authority. Vacancies on the Board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. WHEREAS, The terms of C.D. Peebles, Majorie Zielke, and Debbie Baynard have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints the following members to serve on the Southlake Library Board for a term of two (2)years: Place 1 Expires May 2002 Place 2 Expires May 2002 Place 3 Expires May 2002 Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. City of Southlake, Texas 1 Resolution No. 00-56 • Library Board Appointments Page two PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary • 9 - 3 City of Southlake, Texas COUNCILMEMBERS: Resolution No.00-57, appointments to the Park and Recreation Board will be handed out at the beginning of the Council meeting on Tuesday evening. Sorry for this inconvenience. 9-F City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-58, Appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Action Requested: City Council appoints four (4) members to the Planning and Zoning Commission for two (2) year terms. Background: Resolution No. 00-58 provides for the appointment of four (4) members on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Chapter XI, Section 11.03 of the Home Rule Charter, which relates to the Planning and Zoning Commission, allows for appointments to two- year terms to the commission. Currently four (4) of the seven- member commission has terms that have expired. Those commissioners include: Pamela Muller, Mike Sandlin, C.D. Peebles and a vacant position left by Ann Creighton who resigned to file for a place on the City Council. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-58 2) Applications as submitted Staff Recommendation: Make appointments to fill the four positions. City of Southlake, Texas ,J RESOLUTION NO. 00-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas,was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter Election held on April 4, 1987; and, WHEREAS,in the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI concerns Planning and Zoning; and Section 11.03 allows for appointment for two (2)year terms on the commission; and, WHEREAS, currently the terms of four (4) commissioners have expired; Now, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section: 2. The terms of Pamela Muller,Mike Sandlin, C.D. Peebles and one (1)vacant position (left by Ann Creighton(who resigned to file for a place on the City Council)have expired. Section 3. The City Council hereby appoints the following persons to the Planning and Zoning Commission to serve a term to expire in May 2002. 1. (Two year term) 2. (Two year term) 3. (Two year term) 4. (Two year term) Section 4. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. City of South lake, Texas • Resolution No. 00-58 Planning and Zoning Commission Page two CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary • `76 3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-59,Appointments to the Senior Advisory Commission. Action Requested: City Council approve Resolution No. 00-59, appointing members to the Senior Advisory Commission. Background: Ordinance No. 653, establishes the Senior Advisory Commission and states that the Senior Advisory Commission shall consist of seven(7) citizens of the City of Southlake, who must be at least 55 years of age; and allows two members to be less than age 55 if their experience or education is deemed valuable to the Senior Advisory Commission; and allows for two alternate members. The appointments are for two-year terms. Currently, Places 1,2,3, and 5 have expired. Only two applications have been received for a place on the board. At the request of Mayor Stacy, I will have contacted each member prior to Tuesday night to see if they are willing to continue serving. During the interview process held on June 12, a new couple were interviewed for this board. Financial • Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable • Supporting Documents: 1)Resolution No. 00-59 City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it advisable and necessary to establish a Senior Advisory Commission for the City of Southlake, to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to senior programs and issues, including development of long range capital improvement programs; recommend policies in senior service and improvements; recommend senior-related programs for development of recreational facilities and services; and, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 653 establishes the Senior Advisory Commission and states that the Senior Advisory Commission shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, who must be at least 55 years of age; and allows two members to be less than age 55 if their experience or education is deemed valuable to the Senior Advisory Commission; and allows for two alternate members; and, WHEREAS, the City Council shall appoint the members for two (2)year terms; and, WHEREAS, currently, Places 1,2,3, and 5 have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The terms of members Linda Moore (Place 1), Jeanne Alexander (Place 2), William Cosgrove (Place 3), Matalyn Johnston (Place 5), have expired. A vacant place, Alternate #1 is vacant with a term to expire in May 2001. The City Council desires to appoint the following members to serve on the Senior Advisory Commission: • Place 1 to expire 5/2002 City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 00-59 Senior Advisory Commission Page two Place 2 to expire 5/2002 Place 3 to expire 5/2002 Place 5 to expire 5/2002 Alternate#1 to expire 5/2001 Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE,2000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-60, Appointments members to the Southlake Park Development Corporation (SPDC). Action Necessary: City Council appoints four (4) members to the Southlake Park Development Corporation. Background: Resolution No. 00-60 provides for the appointment of four (4) members to the Southlake Park Development Corporation. The Board of Directors are appointed by the City Council and is composed of seven (7) persons; four (4) of the Board of Directors shall be members of the City Council and the three (3) remaining Directors must not be employees or officers of the City, or members of the City Council. At least one of the remaining Directors must be a member of the Southlake Park and Recreation Board. The other two members are citizens-at-large. Currently the terms of Councilmember Ronnie Kendall, Rick Stacy and the unexpired term of Debra Edmondson who resigned to file for a place as Mayor. Ms. Edmondson left one year remaining on her term. The other appointment is for a citizen-at-large place, which was held by Norm Lyons. The terms, except for one council place, are for two-year appointments. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-60 Staff Recommendation: Make appointments to fill the four positions. ! _ City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by the Department Corporation Act of 1979, Article 5190.6, Texas Revised Statutes as amended (the "Act"), the City Council found it advisable to authorize the creation of a non-profit corporation to be named the Southlake Park Department Corporation, to act on its behalf in financing, under the Act, eligible "projects" deemed to be for the benefit of the public; and, WHEREAS, The Board of Directors shall be appointed by the City Council and be composed of seven (7) persons; four(4) of the Board of Directors shall be members of the City Council and the three (3) remaining Directors must not be employees or officers of the City, or members of the City Council, and at least one of the remaining Directors must be a member of the Southlake Park and Recreation Board; and, WHEREAS, terms of the Directors shall be for two years, expiring on May 31 of odd numbered and even numbered years, respectively. Directors may be appointed to succeed themselves. Each director shall serve until a successor is appointed. WHEREAS, currently three director positions have expired, the Councilmember positions of Ronnie Kendall and Rick Stacy and one citizen-at-large position filled by Norm Lyons; and, WHEREAS, a vacancy exists which was held by Councilmember Debra Edmondson with one (1) year remaining on her term. The term will expire May 31 of 2001; now, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The terms of Ronnie Kendall (Council representative), Rick Stacy (Council representative), and Norm Lyons (citizen representative), have expired. The unexpired term of Debra Edmondson in open for City of Southlake, Texas Resolution No. 00-60 SPDC Appointments Page two reappointment [one year remaining]. Under this resolution, the following appointments are hereby made as allowed for in Ordinance No. 597. Councilmember Position: to expire 5/2002 Councilmember Position: to expire 5/2002 Citizen Position: to expire 5/2002 Councilmember Position to expire 5/2001 Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20111 DAY OF JUNE 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 7/ -3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-61, appointing a Member to the Southlake Library Foundation Board. Action Requested: City Council approving Resolution No. 00-61, naming a Councilmember to the Southlake Library Foundation. Background: Resolution No. 99-75, was approved by the City Council in October, 1999, which indicated that a Southlake Library Foundation would be beneficial in raising the public awareness and support for a future permanent library to serve the City's estimated build-out population of approximately 38,000. The proposed Southlake Library Foundation would include a Board of Directors consisting of one City Council member, one Library Board member, and a variety of community leaders yet to be determined. Currently there is a vacancy for a Council representative with one (1) year remaining on the two (2) year term. The vacancy occurred when former Councilmember Debra Edmondson resigned to file for the Office of Mayor in the May 3, 2000 General Election. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-61 Staff Recommendation: City Council approves Resolution No. 00-61 and appoint a Council member to the Southlake Library Foundation Board of Directors City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A COUNCIL MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE LIBRARY FOUNDATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Southlake is currently in the process of establishing the City's first library system which is to be housed initially within the new Town Hall building. The new library will offer over 10,000 square feet of public area and 17,000 square feet of shared space and staff work areas. Long range goals propose a permanent stand alone facility totaling approximately 40,000 square feet; and, WHEREAS, Information reviewed by the Library Board indicates that a Southlake Library Foundation would be beneficial in raising the public awareness and support for a future permanent library to serve the City's estimated build-out population of approximately 38,000; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Southlake Library Foundation would include a Board of Directors consisting of one City Council member, one Library Board member, and a variety of community leaders; and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 99-75 supports the creation of a library foundation and named Council member Debra Edmondson to the Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, Currently there is a vacancy for a Council representative with one (1) year remaining on the two (2) year term;now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. The above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints , as Council representative on the Southlake Library Foundation Board of Directors. Section 3. This resolution is effective upon approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy Resolution No. 00-61 Library Foundation Page two ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Gr�3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-62,Appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustments Action Requested: City Council approves Resolution No. 00-62, appointing members to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Background: In the City of Southlake Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI, Section 11.02 stated, "The Council, shall appoint a Board of Adjustments which shall have all of the powers and authority as set forth in Article 1011g, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, and as hereafter amended, and such additional powers and privileges as may be duly assigned to it by the ordinances of the City." Ordinance No. 480, Section 44, calls for a five- (5) member board with two (2)alternate members to serve for two-year terms. Currently, the two- (2) terms of Dennis Minder, Vernon Stansell (Alternate #1) and the place vacated by David Harris need to be filled. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Support Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-62 Staff Recommendation: Make appointments to fill the positions. City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has a Zoning Board of Adjustments as stated in the City Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI, Section 11.02; and, WHEREAS,the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 44, calls for a five (5)member board with two (21) alternate members to serve for two-year terms; and, WHEREAS, currently, the two (2)year terms of Dennis Minder, Vernon Stansell (Alternate#1) and the place vacated by David Harris need to be filled; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints the following to serve two (2)year terms: To expire 5/2002 To expire 5/2002 Alternate#1 To expire 5/2002 Section 3. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and approval by the City council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 9i< -a? City of Southlake, Texas I MEMORANDUM June 20, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-65, Appointment of a Liaison to DFW Airport Action Requested: City Council appoints a Liaison to DFW Airport for a one (1) year term. Background: In 1992 the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport staff established a "Neighborhood Forum" whereby surrounding cities would have an official vehicle for input concerning noise problems. The City Council appoints the representative to fill the position of liaison to the board. Resolution No. 00-65 allows for appointment of a representative to sere as liaison to DFW Airport, attending the meetings when notified by the airport staff. Pamela Muller has served in this capacity for the duration of this board. When first appointed, she was a member of the City Council and has continued to serve in this capacity. The appointment can be a member of the City Council or continue to be a citizen appointment. Financial Consideration: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review Not Applicable Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternative: Southlake would have no representation in the "Neighborhood Forum" Supporting Documents: 1) Resolution No. 00-65 °�L- I City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE AS LIAISON TO DFW AIRPORT;PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,in 1992,the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport staff established a "neighborhood forum" whereby surrounding cities would have an official vehicle for input concerning noise problems; and, WHEREAS,the City of Southlake was requested by DFW Airport to send a representative to the DFW Noise Forum, as it came to be knows; now, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied in there entirely. Section 2: That ,is hereby appointed by the City Council to serve as liaison to DFW Airport for the DFW Noise Forum and other related matters. Section 3: That the appointment is hereby effective upon passage of this resolution by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L.LeGrand City Secretary M:\WP-FILES\RESOLUTI\Res00-65.DFW-Airport.doc City of SoutfllaKe, Texas MEMORANDUM June 16, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Assistant City Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Approval of Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc. for the construction of sanitary sewer and roadway improvements along Love Henry Court Action Requested: Staff seeks Council to approve Change Order No. 3 with Jackson Construction, Inc. for the reconstruction of Love Henry Ct. and construction of a sanitary sewer line to serve the residents along Love Henry Ct. in the amount of$11,460. Background Information: The construction of the sanitary sewer for this project began on February 21, 2000. This project includes constructing the sanitary sewer along Love Henry Ct. to Shady Oaks. The construction of the sanitary sewer is complete and the reconstruction of Love Henry Court has begun. The contractor experienced a large amount of subsurface groundwater in certain areas while preparing the subgrade of the road. The subsurface groundwater saturated certain areas and prevented the contractor from obtaining proper compaction of the subgrade. The subgrade must be compacted properly prior to installing the hot-mix asphalt concrete (HMAC). Prior to construction, a geotechnical engineer obtained three core samples of the subsurface soil along the Love Henry Court to determine the proper amount of lime for stabilizing the subgrade. A small amount of subsurface groundwater was detected in one of the three cores. However, the amount detected was not substantial enough for the geotechnical engineer to recommend provisions to collect and/or divert subsurface groundwater. Nevertheless, the present subsurface groundwater conditions warrant provisions to collect and divert the groundwater. The design engineer has recommended the installation of a subsurface drain along the north side of Love Henry Court extending along the saturated areas (approximately 700 linear feet). The subsurface drain will intercept the subsurface groundwater prior to the groundwater 10A-1 City of Southlake, Texas reaching the subgrade of the roadway. Once the groundwater is intercepted, it will flow in a pipe and then discharge into the storm drain system. Change Order No. 3 is for the installation of the subsurface drain. Once the area has dried out, the subgrade will have to be reworked and compacted. The contractor has installed the subdrain to prevent delaying the completion of the project. Financial Considerations: The original contract for the paving and sanitary sewer improvements was $365,253.00. This included construction of a sidewalk along Love Henry Court. The City Council directed staff to eliminate the sidewalk from the contract. This was accomplished by Change Order No. 1 and reduced the contract by $27,192. Change Order No. 2 was for the extension of the sanitary sewer along Shady Oaks from Love Henry Court to serve 5 properties along Shady Oaks. Change Order No. 2 totaled $39,393.25. The costs associated with this project, including change orders 1, 2, & 3 are tabulated below: • The original contract amount was $365,253 • The engineering, surveying, and testing cost was $30,078.31. • Change Order No. 1 was ($27,192) • Change Order No. 2 was $39,393.25 • Chang Order No. 3 is $11,460.00 Therefore, the cost for the project totals $418,992.56, which is $59,992.56 over the budgeted amount ($359,000). The cost overrun will have to be funded using available funds that exist from projects that were below budget. The cost for this project has been included in the attached CIP Project Cost Ledger. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: None. The installation of the subdrain is not only necessary to construct the new road but to prevent the groundwater from adversely affecting the subgrade and roadway in the future. Supporting Documents: Project map Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 3 CIP Project Costs Ledger 10A-2 City of Southlake, Texas Staff Recommendation: Staff seeks Council approval of Change Order No 3 to the contract with Jackson Construction, Inc. to construct sanitary sewer and paving improvements to Love Henry Ct. in the amount of$11,460. Please place this item on the June 20, 2000 City Council Agenda for review and consideration. SP/sep 10A-3 . LOVE HENRY SANITARY SEWER AND PAVING PROJECT MAP 1 / s Proposed - --- I [ `--( SW° ES Paving - es ' J oPK1 )iik \ �` THE-p`KE -11, in o P S Ilk SS I a .. NN,�- iii I I P111111 Proposed - ' Sewer Line vENS _� pp,l‘pN Existing — Sewer Line PN SPv`NGs e�'" aOr�� 1709/SHADY S � � V F.M.1 I I i r I I 11 .709 -.iw\r 10A-4 14, DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES, INC. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 E�ir_UccgS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS PROJECT: Love Henry Court DATE OF ISSUANCE: February 3, 2000 (From Shady Oaks to Cul-De-Sac) OWNER: City of Southlake ENGINEER: Dunaway Associates, Inc. 1950 E. Continental 1501 Merrimac Circle, Suite 100 Southlake,Texas 76092 Fort Worth,Texas 76107 CONTRACT: Pavement Rehabilitation and Sanitary Sewer Construction CONTRACTOR: Jackson Construction, Inc. 5112 Sun Valley Dr. Fort Worth,Texas 76119 YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: Remove Item Nos. 23 and 24 from Base Bid: 23. 8,310 SF Standard reinforced concrete sidewalk 24. 2 EA Reinforced concrete handicap accessible ramps CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME $ 365,253.00 Original Contract Price 150 Calendar Days Original Contract Time $ 0.00 Previous Change Order Nos. 0 Calendar Days Net Change from Previous Change Orders $ 0.00 Field Change Order(No Number) $ 365,253.00 Contract Price Prior to this 150 Calendar Days Contract Time Prior to this Change Order Change Order $ (27,192) Net Increase (Decrease)of this 0 Calendar Days Net Increase (Decrease)of this Change Order Change Order $ 338,061.00 Contract Price with All 150 Calendar Days Contract Time with All Approved Approved Change Orders Change Orders RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: APPROVED: Dunaway Associates, Inc. City of South Jackson C nstruction, Inc. Ww—Pta.i.,4„0l i t "`" % i.--By: By: . Daniel Ochinciuc, P.E. Shawn Poe, P.E. Larry'H. JaEkson d Project Manager Senior Civil Engineer President 10A-5 06/14/2000 10:04 817-421-5782 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PAGE 01 CHANGE ORDER No. 2 Dated: March 21, 2000 Project Sanitary Sewer & Paving Improvements to serve Love Henry Court OWNER City ofSouthlake Contract For Sanitary Sewer& Paving Improvements Contract Date February 21, 2000 To: Jackson Construction, Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: • City of Southlake Owner z By Dated /0 , 2000 Nature of Changes: Pay Quantity Unit Description Price per Unit Total Item 1 750 LF 8" SDR-35 PVC sewer pipe $ 21.00 $15,750.00 2 750 LF TV inspection of sewer pipe $ 1.00 $ 750.00 3 750 LF Trench Safety $ 1.00 $ 750.00 4 2 EA Standard 4' S.S. Manhole $1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 5 10 VF 4' diameter extra depth for MH $ 150.00 $ 1,500.00 6 2 EA Watertight manhole insert $ 50.00 $ 100.00 7 2 EA Concrete collar for MH $ 290.00 $ 580.00 8 2 EA Vacuum test MH $ 100.00 $ 200.00 9 5 EA 4-inch sanitary sewer connection $ 225.00 $ 1,125.00 10 100 LF 4-inch sanitary sewer service line $ 29.00 $ 2,900.00 11 50 LF 8" sanitary sewer by bore $ 140.00 I $ 7,000.00_ Total — $34,255.00 15%contingency= $5.]38.25 Total amount of CO = $39,393.25 These Changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: 10A-6 06/14/2000 10:04 817-421-5782 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PAGE 02 . ) ... Contract Price Prior to This Change Order, , ; .;•-t:-..-s $ 338,061 Net Increase Resulting from This Change Order $ 39,393.25 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 377,454 25 id,,,,....:.,..,?.! ..•.... •::-, ...... 1. •'.,........,:- r... .....•_.:i-...,=,_., • . . •• NSPE,ASCE1910-8:-B()9711Editibii)?—"".:'•', • • - " . ..'. i: ... .1;,:;;..f.,A0004447 ....7 : .ltiVqt•-••.. .... .*:...:.'... ...: .. . . . . Contract Time Prier to This Change . . 150 calendar days 4:1.Fr.1.;614.'"V"I' ' ':;,'.li,e:,..3/4Lkj,,,,fein:,; 1.ki, Net Resulting from This Change Order . • AV 4.14--- /i d .- •••,,,,-.7 " . .......•• '' • "..'' ' '',',.*,:.t!1;1.1,";,.7.,wr.Ft...‘ z;.A.,.17:147, . . 7fif/ 4 ..i....-.:".1..1:%•• !G•k.r.7....4.:Lti..4.,•As14!.k.tte•,:t.t.i•,0•.--.9zs. ,.., "`".7"..::'.':•;77."ty 7•••—'7• '7'....'77. :=,13.y.:/)'.•-•''"'"7,.'.. . ".e.:. .:. .....1.0.r .... -ti.4.• ' ---.....".*.i:1 . ''`Mi'il4iii-PViair. 9';e11:VI'N5Yb.61-.....' -':'; . Calendar days 111 .........., , .. ..,,,• •u 0 iu-4 ..,:.. -... ..!,. .,....... ;. ar,...,...„...,.....-..,„,,,..,,,,... ,,,,,,•••• . : ......... "•,' . L4.."%t-.7: .;/•!.. , .• --Ct.4. cl:r,-;?i-Q-...!:..,-e:-. ,,-,q..-4 re.A.,, -...r , L• •11-,i':- .L.,,':•,,•:',P,:;..i."r* • ' „joie . , - .::,,,g/ ,,,•-•;LP •••='W,....,;•4 " ---'. ..•• !rilzr. .-•., it. ',.„., : .1-..,'''/• ,...,: ' ••• • . • .•• • . , ••• :••• •••'• •7..7.;* The Above Changes Mt Approved • •.. '• .... .. ..:.. ..* 4. .... b , d.I... ar,er, P.E.. ., .. ,-,, ,i• blicworks B ....'...1 /4Afir' .'?!5' ;A`. ;411 f.: i.rr7;w;1° • • ., err ...., ..., ... •• . . • . "-,,,ly,,..z.:.! ..., ..,,,i,........ ...,.,„‘r ,, " . . • .... Dait?,ii.,....... ...:-.r 2'• ,•- ••• ,2000 :''- • •4",'--,,,,,-ty.,•,4:-.••'. ;.. ..• .:.!:•-•.•.-.•• .• . . . .•.... • . ...... ••;,--•• . in' '... ••••'44ifittilingliiiiiiol'44, •,*1-44:4-4:4,t= .'n',-"''''*•%'1.,'•••••••••''''..."''''.••:444&.:.01.,4:''''''''''''''' .ke'V'''''• - '• 4 •',. . . ....... • ..,...z...,..AV.., ,-c, ,...4.'.. , !'..a ' ' .. .. • . • Ji? •;''''....;".V0/011P, . , . I••••••• .. . •. • • • • • •— • . . -•• . • ' .. • . . • .. , . .. . . ': :'0,,,t,:)..i-4 ',''....'...'..'4,1,'4,wgg'e:..=..•: ., ' ' .. . The , ....., %.,fluve, : ' Changes Are Accepted ..•-...•;...,.. , ..-• .. • -• •-•Jackson Constru, ion Inc t...'• '... : -..IT:41'4 1.. : ' ‘. ...•.':..' t' ,i•... •"'••••• ,.• r •r*". / t : '-'''.4".'''''''....t`T'''''1,....;;;'2::, • -.. • .•. ..:::•-:..::' Al*;titn.,...;.1" p:E:.51.. / / / "'"'".1:'?'":'•7 r..' .'..1'4...; • :.•-• . ' 1•.';l't • A'i'1 C,1•V • ••••• ow , --..- iff'Lc/a a.46.7...andt..6.116d . .• r• -,--.+... :•.....1..#O.I.!;,i•47',;••;•*••-:.•;?!••••• i -. viata. 1o1!‘.'.'t..':..4....•5......!,..v-!--.... P — , ve70 ,2000 ,.. . i•• .. .. ,.?.:•"... •;• .• ' :..,•*. :.•:•.;••:•.'••*. Ok....!..it. . .. . • . ... . ..-...... , • : • ' ••• .. 4..• .•••• • 't ... . • . _ 1 0A-7 CHANGE ORDER No. 3 Dated: June 13. 2000 Project Sanitary Sewer&Paving Improvements to serve Love Henry Court OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Sanitary Sewer &Paving Improvements Contract Date February 21, 2000 To: Jackson Construction, Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By Dated , 2000 Nature of Changes: Installation of a subdrain along Love Henry Court Pay Quantity Unit Description Price per Unit Total Item 1 700 LF 6" Subdrain $ 12.50 $8,750.00 2 900 SY Re-work and compact subgrade $ 2.00 $1,800.00 3 10 ton Hydrated Lime $ 91.00 $ 910.00 Total= $11,460.00 These Changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 377,454.25 Net Increase Resulting from This Change Order $ 11,460.00 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 388,914.25 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) 10A- 8 Contract Time Prior to This Change 150 calendar days Net Resulting from This Change Order 0 Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 150 calendar clays The Above Changes Are Approved: Ronald J. Harper, P.E. Director of Public Works By Date , 2000 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Jackson Construction, Inc. Contractor By Date , 2000 10A- 9 CIP PROJECT COSTS Y A B C D 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGETED AMOUNT BID/FINAL COST DIFFERENCE 2 1.5 MGD MIRON ELEVATED TOWER■ S1,860,000 $1,832,000 $28,000 3 20"WATERLINE ALONG FM 1709 $641,000 $638,408 $2,592 4 24"WATER LINE ALONG N.WHITE CHAPEL S850,000 $826,455 S23,545 5 BRUMLOW $112,700 $111,000 $1,700 6 BURNEY LN.-REHAB CUL-DE-SAC $57,000 $64,523 ($7,523) 7 BYRON NELSON STOP LIGHT $40,000 S65,000 (S25,000) 8 BYRON NELSON STRIPING $65,000 $65,637 ($637) 9 CROSS TIMBER HILL SEWER $2,953,649 S2,811,783 $141,866 10 COMMERCE TRAFFIC LIGHT* $100,000 $48,405 $51,595 11 DIAMOND CIRCLE STREETS&SEWER $1,286,000 $990,161 S295,839 12 DOVE ACRES SEWER• $405,000 S205,474 $199,526 13{DOVE ESTATES LIFT STATION* $300,000 $167,473 $132,527 14 DOVE FORCE MAIN,PHASE I' $1,747,500 $2,154,200 ($406,700) 15 DOVE FORCE MAIN,PHASE 2* $1,809,650 $1,650,649 $159,001 16 DOVE/HIGHLAND PAVING* $611,480 S778,533 ($167,053) 17 DOVE/SH 114 WATER LINE RELOCATION $339,200 $280,424 $58,776 18 FLORENCE TOWER TANK PAINTING $105,000 $152,200 ($47,200) 19 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SEQUENCING' $120,000 $42,000 $78,000 20 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONVERSIONS* $200,000 $123,399 $76,601 21 HARRELL DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION* S140,000 S175,464 (S35,464) 22 HILLWOOD SEWER* $95,000 $82,415 $12,586 23 HUNTWICK ESTATES SEWER $200,000 $276,123 ($76,123) 24 JELLICO SEWER' $500,000 $419,723 S80,277 25 KIRKWOOD WATER LINE $326,000 $266,159 $59,841 26 LAKE DRIVE WATER,SEWER,PAVING' $364,500 $376,991 ($12,491) 27 LILAC LN.WATER,SEWER,STREET* $234,600 $286,782 ($52,182) 28 LOVE HENRY COURT SEWER&STREET' $359,000 $418,993 ($59,993) 29 MISSION HILL SEWER $430,000 $489,099 ($59,099) 30 N.WHITE CHAPEL-COUNTY LINE TO LAKE' $340,000 S470,970 ($130,970) 31 N.WHITE CHAPEL-DOVE TO COUNTY LINE* $181,850 $177,010 $4,840 32 N-3&N-4 LIFT STATIONS* $1,000,000 $1,009,500 (S9,500) 33 N-5 SEWER&KIMBALIJSH 114 WATER/SEWER RELOCATIONS' $762,500 $743,255 $19,245 34 NAPA VALLEEY/WOODLAND HEIGHTS WATER LINE' $30,000 $59,960 ($29,960) 35 PEARSON GROUND STORAGE TANK NO.2' $1,687,400 S1,545,247 $142,153 36 PINE SEWER* $200,000 $183,368 $16,632 37 PLANTATION SEWER $110,400 $84,676 $25,724 38 PUBLIC WORKS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS* $405,600 $472,580 ($66,980) 39 PUMP STATION NO.2• $3,110,000 $3,176,800 (S66,800) 40 RAINTREE/SHADY LN WATER,SEWER,PAVING $1,925,995 $1,615,029 $310,966 41 RIDGECREST• $355,576 $400,504 ($44,928) 42 SABRE SEWER CONNECTION-SOLANA $25,000 $21,700 $3,300 43 SHADY OAKS TRAFFIC LIGHT' $100,000 $91,000 $9,000 44 SOUTHLAKE/KELLER PUMP STATION MOD. $300,000 $116,281 $183,720 45 SUTTON PLACE DRAINGE&PAVING IMPROVEMENTS• $270,000 $311,865 ($41,865) 46 TIMARRON-BENT CREEK REPAIR• $726,986 $699,315 $27,671 47 TROPHY CLUB 24"WATER LINE* $1,511,000 S1,440,693 $70,307 48 W.CONTINENTAL RECON.-PHASE 1' $755,750 $808,177 ($52,427) 49 W.DOVE RECON.-PEYTONVILLE TO SHADY OAKS $259,680 S298,397 (S38,717) 50 W.JONES BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS* $1,000,000 $930,522 $69,478 51 WATER&SEWER TO MIRON ADDITION $196,781 $262,535 ($65,754) 52 TOTAL S31,506,797 S30,718,855 53 TOTAL(OVER)/UNDER BUDGET $787,942 54 55 *Project not yet complete. Cost shown reflects contract bid price&engineering,surveying costs 56 10A-10 6/14/00 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 13, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext. 757) SUBJECT: Award of bid for lighting for Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and #10 to NEMA3 Electric Action Requested: City Council consider authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract for construction of Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and #10 lighting, including Alternate #1, with NEMA3 Electric of Midlothian, Texas, in the amount of$99,291. Background Information: SPDC approved funding in the amount of $200,000 for construction of Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and #10 lighting in the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Budget at their December 6, 1999 meeting (6-0). The City Council approved the SPDC FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Budget without additional changes at their December 7, 1999 meeting on Regular agenda(6-0). The bid specifications for the construction of the game field lighting require the following project scope: • Constructing lighting sufficient to distribute thirty (30) footcandles throughout game fields #4, #5, and#10. ■ Establish electrical capacity to complete two (2) existing scoreboards and • provide electrical capacity for an additional two (2) future scoreboards. This includes establishing service for three (3) existing backstop scorekeeping tables and one (1) future backstop scorekeeping table. • Develop and coordinate the location and direction of security light for the game fields with staff, and install conduit to provide future light and single duplex receptacle service to two (2) existing softball batting cages. • Alternate#1 - requires the installation of a permanent fully closed pedestal between game fields #4 and #10 with two (2) duplex receptacles for portable vending services trailers. The estimated project timeline is fifty (50) working days upon'entering into a contract with NEMA3 Electric. Staff conducted the bidding process in compliance with applicable laws and procedures. Bids were opened on June 9, 2000, with the low bid being submitted by NEMA3 Electric of Midlothian, Texas. The bid submittal /05w! J 1 Billy Campbell, City Manager June 13, 2000 Page 2 included a base bid of $97,291, and Alternate #1 totaling $2,000, yielding a grand total of$99,291. NEMA3 Electric was the contractor for the Bicentennial Park Phase II Bid Package #2a, lighting for the tennis courts and in-line hockey court, and game field lighting for fields #1 and #3 in 1999. Their work on this project was to the satisfaction of staff. Reference checks with the Cities of DeSoto, Arlington, and Garland indicated that they were all very satisfied with the work performed by NEMA3 Electric on their projects. Financial Considerations: SPDC and the City Council approved funding in the amount of$200,000 in the FY 1999-2000 Parks Capital Improvement Budget for game field lighting construction at Bicentennial Park fields #4, #5, and #10. To date $1,470 has been expended for the development of the lighting plan design, leaving an unencumbered balance of$198,530. The bids received were well within the approved $200,000 budget due to work performed in Bicentennial Park Bid Package #2a. While completing the lighting improvements for game fields #1 and #3, the size of the electrical panels in the vicinity were increased to be able to accommodate possible future lighting needs. These panels are now able to accommodate game fields #4, #5, and#10. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable. Legal Review: Standard bid specifications have been reviewed by the City Attorney. Alternatives: Alternatives include the following: • Accept the lighting construction bid at $97,291 and reject Alternate#1. ■ Reject both the lighting construction bid and Alternate #1, and proceed to reopen the bidding process. • Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Bid tabulation for the construction of Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and#10 lighting. • Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with NEMA3 Electric of Midlothian, Texas, for construction of Bicentennial Park game fields #4, #5, and #10 lighting in the amount of$97,291, with Alternate #1 at $2,000, for a total contract amount of$99,291. ioBz City of Southlake Department of Community Services BID TABULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Bicentennial Park Game Field Lighting — Fields #4, #5, and #10 PROJECT NUMBER: 00-302016A DATE: June 9, 2000 WORKING DAYS: 50 days ENGR. EST.: N/A BIDDER BID BASE BID ALTERNATE BASE BID BOND #1 NEMA 3 Electric X $97,291 $2,000 $99,291 Midlothian, Texas JC Electric, Inc. X $108,980 $1,600 $110,580 Keller, Texas 06-63-0003 /43 N:IParks&RecreationlBOARDSICC120001Qtr314,5,10LightingBidTab.doc OWNERS DEDICA TION 60 RLG 10' U77LITY EASEMENT - CAB A ; SUDE 4649 P.R. rC. r 15' PRIVA7E BOUNDARY SE WR \ EA.S£MENT CAB. 'A" Si/D£ 4649 P.R. T. C r 50' BUILDING UNE CAB A' SLIDE 4 P.R.TCT GRAPHIC SCALE 30 60 120 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 fL LOT 6 DRAKE ADD177ON VOL. 388-124, PG. 158 P.R. T.C. T. 1 478.8' 25' BUILO/NG UNE IDOL. J88• PG. 124 P.R. T c. r LOT 7 DRAKE ADDI ROM VOL. 388-124, PG. 168 P.R. T.C. T. 476. o' I I I I I � LOT 4R2 ✓. G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADD/77ON CAB. A, 4. 4649 P.R. T.. T. STA TE OF TEXAS ) 2.o COUNTY OF TARRANT ) WHEREAS we the City of Southlake actin b and through the undersigned, r , y g y g g d, ore the owners of o tract or parcel of land situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, in C/RF the City of Southlake, Torront County, Texas, according to the deeds recorded in Volumes 13546, Page 4JI, Volume 13546, Page 430, and Volume 13546, Page 433, Deed (CONTROLLING MON') 45' LOT I , Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of Lot 2 of Block 1, Corner Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A Slide 981, COMMON PR/VA TE OPEN SPACE 412� y Plot Records, Tarrant NO. 3 dL MEADOW DRAINAGE ESMT. n County, Texas, all of that tract of loud conveyed to Robert G. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 3976, Poge 12, Deed Records, Torront County, Texas and all of Lots 2 and 3, MYERS MEADOW PHASE /l . '� �' NoW500 A00J170N f� W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, on addition to the Cityof Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2833, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, more particular/ described as a CAB. P.R.L. 2160 , • ' _ ` - - IN CAB. A PG. 2833 y HAROLD SAUNDERS 1s' U nUTY EASEMENT , T. C. T. _ - " - �� `�- follows.' VOL. 7232, PG. 428 KC r2404; Pc. 22Jo _ A Q D. RQ T C. T D.R. r..,C. T.141Q PG. 780 , r • • � _ _ - 15' y I EASE►rE ;"JX C/RF_----+s4'oo �'A" 5�1DE � AB-.� `%� -�i �pc�BEGINNING at a plastic capped iron rod stomped "Brittain & Crawford"" found for corner in the northwesterly line of Southlake Boulevard (a 130 foot right-of-way), said rod being (coN7ROLL/Nc MON) E Elaoo,-_-__-- - oN�o.�' g9 p TCT-r �I s the southerly common corner between Lot 1, Block 1 of said Corner Addition and said Brown tract;3 14 J9.3227' Fr 5GO�N ' f0*27.33' WII �pUTY LOE 2833PLAT G g �N��.E 14 79•Z ' N 'Z 5 A s� TN1s P� \8 S� t THENCE North 15 48 53" West alongthe common line between said Lot 1 and said Brown tract for o distance of 207.80 feet to a chisel mark found for corner, said chisel morn 4 1 _Z� CAB. Br a / N ' _-� _--- i �- -- it a v i ABANoO ! — ,�,\\ ��\ +,�,berg the easterly common corner of Lots 1 and 2 of said Corner Addition; rUfYEA� E 11882 w, N�5�0'E� LOT 2 `'o 'G`� h G1� i' 1 / , ., CiR TUnUTY VOL,i1fo7� PG rc r. 1 Z rs — w. R. EAt�FS $� THENCE South 51 04 37 West along the common line between said Lots 1 and 2 for, c distance of 195.62 feet to a chisel mark set in the east line of Rondol Mill Road (a JO'DRA/NA EASE Wr I B. 'A _� p.R.T.C.T D•R` + 75400w 1o'u71L/rYEASEMEN\ No. 500 A00177ON �> ,� variable width right -of --way) from which o chisel mark found bears South 555040 East o distance of 0.31 feet, said chisel mark set being the westerly common corner CAB A; E 98f -*+ -'� 579 BY MIS PLAT \ � K � � i LOT , BLOCK 1 1 CAB. A PG. 2833 \ , between said Lots 1 and 2; P.R. T. C T. - _ " ! �� + `� SOUTPILAKE CROSSING tOOP41077- u, um/rY EA.S£A&NT H i ,`♦ \ `� '� PHASE,"»"KC f1077 PG. 168 z1 `+ LOT 3 , \ `�`� CAB. A" SL/DE 2425 THENCE North 000407 East along the east line of said Randal Mill Road for a distance of 361.86 feet to on iron rod with plastic cap stomped Brittain & Crawford found for D.R.T.Cr.0 H 1 A 1 2 IRS P.R.7.C.T. corner, said rod bein in the souther/ line of a tract of land conve ed to Harold Sounders b deed recorded in Volume 7232, Pa e 428, Deed Records, Tarrant Count Texas; ! \\ Y +GROSS 176, 614 S0. FT. (4.05 A) ' �'� g y y y g Nq10 010E 7.5' U7UTY EASEMENT ^_ 00 , i vB9`55 5J' I 5' R-O-W; DEDICA nAV CAB A ; SLIDE 981, \ ' 10 * ' ' " „ BY 1N15 PfAr fo' Unurr _ + NET 174, 812 SQ. FT. (4. 01 AC) , THE North 79 24 07" East aloe the souther/ line of said Saunders tract for a distance of 81.23 feet to on iron rod with plastic cap stamped Brittain & Crawford found 5.gs' + P.R.CT ; c, ' 'for on angle point, said rod beingthenortherly common corner between said Lot 2 and said Brown tract; P P P (1802 so. ;FT.) EASEMENT + LOT 3 \ ' '• ABANDONED BY nfl5 PUT 1 i , 25' M/AE CCM/IACW s i W 1 BY 1HrS PUT A-B9S0'IJ' ' i ' ly 2 i +, '� W. R. EA VES A ACCESS CAS 9101T i A- f 140'IJ" (E N R=?e �" ND. 500 ADD177ON il �,c�4 , / CAB A ; SY qE ?�?S Ci i " S y +1 r 2Li 42' CAB. A PG. 2833 ��� t 1' P.R. r. L r 9 9 �' ' THENCE North 79 3227" East continuing along the souther/ line of said Sounders tract for a distance of 64.60 feet to on iron rod with plastic cap stomped "Brittain & • 1 � � f7.9�I 5`4A S ��y�' L=44.69' ,�`' 1' g � •. ' ,'x`� „ L-35.7s �' ` \ c�lB=N84t710.1s'w Pa` - ��' g / 1 2- IRS ��Crowford found for an angle point, said rod being the souther/y common corner between said Sounders tract and M rs Meadow Phase Two, an addition to the Cityof Southlake • I 0 L OT j 2 BLOCK 1 + 6-28 4973" CHO-N5654'44 _ / CHD-40.25E ,15 �J / R-148.50' 1 \►t o-9o,�oa, ti (CONTROLLING MOW.) as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2160, Plot Records, Tarrant County, Texas; O i m COR/jER ADD/TION r Ja 16' Q'I�J5.69' \�''s P {�5 R-18.50' R11, • �• fibI CAB. �A" SL/OE 981 \ c-74.70E 1 $r. T=18.50' f �' / �' 1070 07' \ o► 1 5° t�j w / " 9 y )' P P P �--I CHO-H6579'181 3 �� L-29.06E PS �' THENCE North 7.9'S4 00 East Elan the souther/ line of said Myers Meadow Phase Two for o distance of 418.68 feet to a iron rod with plastic cop stamped "Moak Surv. Inc. " 0 �O (�7J.92' Oh CNe=N0534501� G� found for corner, said rod beingthe norther/ common corner between Lots 1 and 2 of said W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition; I R-29�50' j� + ' L=52. + / ',Y 00' ,x Wig,, d=675142" j ,'� '�/ / THENCE South 3900'45" Eost along the common line between said Lots 1 and distance f 9 S5 3J E CHB=N�44 59 Lt3 E 4'00� \ 64 71 ,tr 10 r ?6 + b o� \ ' R=2B.50' 1 i „ ., 28.44' I N795 S Ab 5� \ 9 2 for o dista o 199.46 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cop stomped RLG set for CHO=5'1.91' _� 1 1 + 1c 111 T=f7.4?' ,�' i i ' `— `�g{ 4 • y L=J1.27' P' �S' '' / '/ LOT 7, BLOCK 1 corner in the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard, said rod being the southerly common corner between said Lots 1 and 2; \ �1 A=6712744" ►9 '� CH6=N70'J7.01'W �R i' i • ' ACCESS EE SEAWNr �' i NOOV4071r , p► R=ra50' 1O '� P�% `� P'� ' / SOUTHLAKE CROSSING \ 16 3r CHO-29j P\� . P , , '�' 9 / CAB. it , SLIDE 2425 ,i . .. 27.00E I c�5 +p �� T 121r �to } pfi 8 ,, ,, O PR 7C.T PHASE /I THENCE South 50 54 50 West along the northwesterly line of said Southlake Boulevard for a distance 609.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 212,427 square feet 47.72 qy L=11.6r i i �- fo7o'o7' SJ954'o0 1� z, . �o GP , ,� r ' CAB. A ; SLIDE 2425 CHO-S2970'58'w or 4.8767 acres, more or less. ?a 44' I i R=J25 50' 1 b � , � i' P.R. T. C. T N89 55 53 I i r=2G 96' , \ �, �D=?D ; i' �' ��5" ,' �' L o T 6, BL OCK 1 NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN B Y THESE PRESENTS • I L7/57N8459 03 f I %RF LOT 2R + �� f ,' • 1/2 IRS `� ,�' i SOU IHLAKE CROSSING I (CONTROLLING MON) the City of Southlake, b and through the undersigned, its du/ authorized agent, being the owners do hereby adopt this lot desi nat#? the hereinabove described it ' 35813 SQ. FT. I `� �0 ` �� f % PHASE l/ THAT, we y y 9 9 y 9 9 I ^ I 15' ORA/N�fGE� N0 UnUTY 1 + / �'- ,' ,' � \� �' � CAB "A", SLIDE 2425 )' P P 9 9 ,O I EASEMENT: � \ +\ (0 82 AC) 1 ��' ' �/ P.R. T.C.T. property as Lot 2R and Lot 3, Block 1, Corner Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and we do hereby dedicate the rights of way and easements cAe. A; Pc 981, a•617oJ7' \ shown thereon to the public' use unless otherwise noted. This plot does not ater or remove existing deed restriction or covenants, if any, on the property. P. R. T. C T R=26� 50' \ \ 5' UMJTY EA5DfN r - • / a4= P P / S 553 40' E A I € \ BY 7MS PUT , o 25' UlX/rY EASEM r �, T 16.85' \ , i- O ; L=JO.4J' ` +-' + , I F'R.T.C.r 242 WITNESS m hand of Southlake, Tarrant Count Texas this ____ day of ______ O I �j'. • CW-W930'42aw �\ . � i �'/� \ / �p� i y y )'-------' 2000. I ChV-29. 01 ' \ +� P I 1 ` '1 4 ' Z I 7.5' ururY £Asvowr \ \ . � I / IV cAe. A ; sLM 967, \ +� 'l��•P S 1 � g, �� a ,' /.. City of Southlake P.R.T. T. CM I C CMF t,' 10' unuTY EASEMENT BY 7NrS PLAT Z 1 . \n1 Q' / n r /d i'/ j' BY --- + S / n , //�, j --------------------------- 42 TEXACO GAS STATION -+ + \\ 6 yy LOT 5, BLOCK 1 + \� , SOUIHLAKE CROSSING LOT 1, BLOCK 1 TITLE.'__—_ 84 C CORNER ADD/T70N O ++ ++V / /�� ��P�' ��� �' i PHASE ll---------------- -- ' CAB. A' SLIDE 2425 CAB. 'A", SLIDE 981 + 1 J ��� .' �.' P.R. T. C. T. P.R. T. C. T. 00 \ _ A0� GS � 50' 90LLVNG LINE OR `Tm- , CAB. A • SUJDE 2425 i +\ / STA TE OF TEXAS ) i� P.R.Tr_ T COUNTY OF TARRANT POINT OF BEGINN G O , k1t;0 j / ��'� (CON7ROLLLING MON.) �,', BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personal/y appeared — ----- — --------- ---- of the City of Southlake, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and ccknow/edged to me that he/she executed the some for the purposed and consideration expressed and in the i 11✓. `� j ! C\ , as 25' UI1L/rY EASEWNr 009" P� CAB. A, 51" 1614 capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said City of Southlake. P.R. r r- r �Pa w GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL on this _-__ day of _---------- 20061 1o' um/rY EI SEMENr LOT 4, BLOCK 1 CAB. A; SY r-4649 I ��' �G , / SOU THLPAKSCROSSING P.R. T. C. T l P� S i , L I P ,' , CAB. A ; SLIDE 1614 ,'� I 4J 5 I I i \`P" g r`�S ,'' 1`' 9• r �' P.R. T. C. T. % ,' i So Bu1Lo/NG L>lvE CAB. A' SUJDE 16/4 ; P.R.T.Cr , so' R o. w. I R£SERVAnpV /h£ ►' ' ' ' ' I 1 CAB. I P.A ; 57J 4649 / �, 50" BUILDING LN1E I R. T.0 r I , GIB A' SLIDE 1613 1 LOT 4R3 I 5' u71UTY EASEADNr J. G. ALLENB. A N NO 1B j , ' CA' St/DE 16fJ ,�' �i ,�' ADD/NON I / P.R. rr- r 2R, BLOCK 1 / , SS/NG B. CAA, 4649 SOUTNLAKE CRO i ,� �' P.R. rC. T. I / ,' ,� PHASE I CAB. A' SLIDE 1613 P.R. T.C. T 3' U1ILJTY EAsnomr I , . ► , , CAB. A' SZE 161J 5 ' O' UIrL/lY EA / . P.R.T.C. r lSEMENT / 1 , / , T. CAB. A ; 57J 4649 y' P.R. T.C. T i ,' LOT 3R, BLOCK' � , SOU7HLAKE CROSSING / f ^ / ( � ,� I ,�, PHASE I CAB. A ; S/,'DE 1613 P.R. T.C. T. DRANVAcc EAs%V£Nr H ' 6U_ 96f4, PG 173J D.R. r c T 150. ORMVAGE d U7VrY E.4SOOENr w CAB. A , SZE 16iJ P.R. r. c r r a 2 HILLSIDE CT. o o � s '� JOHNSON y (FJU. 7709) n 2 O lb SUR VEYOR'S CER 77F/CA 710N THIS is to certify that 1, G. Richard Busby, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from on actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plot correctly, represents that survey made by me or under my direct supervision. G. Richard Busby, R.P.L.S. No. 4111 State of Texas STA TE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF TARRANT ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personal/v appeared G. Richard Busby, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purposed and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL on this __— day of , 2000. Notary Public My commission expires: Notes: 1. Selling a portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DA TE.•-------------- MA YOR: ------------------------ CITY SECRETARY - ----------------------------- Notary Public My commission expires: STA TE OF TEXAS f COUNTY OF TARRANT WE, the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easements noted on thois plot, said easements being previously recorded in Cabinet A ", Slide 981, and Cabinet 'A " Slide 2833, of the Plat Records of Tarrant Countt; Texas. TXU Electric/Gas Tri- County Electric Coop era vti ve, Inc. Signed.•-------------- --- Signed-__ — - — ------------- Printed Name. —__—_ Printed Name: __________________— Title: ------------------------- Title: ------ Date: --------------- -------- Date ----------------------------- GTE Central, Inc. Signed'------------------ --- Prin ted Name: Title: _ Date:______ Charter Communications Signed.• ______-____ Printed Nome: Title. - Date -- ------- - - - - - - Southwestern Bell Telephone Sign ed.• - •----------- Printed Title.' ------------ Date. -------------- APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DA TLr _-----_ CHAIRMAN. PLANNING AND ZONING SECRETARY _—_____ PLAT REVISION OF LOT 2,R AND LOT 3, BLOCK 1 CORNER ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAAR. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1 CORNER ADDITION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 981, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A REVISION OF LOTS 2 AND 3, W.R. LEAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 500 ADDITION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2833, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND CONTAINING 1.4700 ACRES TRACT OF LAND IN THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 500, ALL BEING 4.8767 ACRES IN SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEM J 2 LOTS CITY CASE NO. ZA 00-049 SCALE: f' - 60' DATE: FEBRUARY fO, 2000 OWNER: SURVEYOR: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RAYMOND L. GOODSON, JR., INC. 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE ,TX 76092 5445 LA SIERRA SUITE 300 L.B.17 DALLAS, TX. 75231-4f38 (214) 739-8100 VICINITY Al.4P Nor 70 WALE FILED IN CABINET___—___, SLIDE DATE_ SHEET f OF f 22640 A LOT 6 DRAKE ADD177ON VOL. 388-124, PG. 68 P.R. T C. T. (L.U.D. = LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL") ZONED SF-lA LOT 7 DRAKE ADD177ON VOL. 388-124, PG. 68 P. R. T. C. T. ( L. U.D. = OFT / COMMERCIAL ") ZONED SF-lA 1 f� I v �F-A irl I t � I J1 t I � 1 � �I f ' I € LOT 4R2 J. G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADD177ON 1 CAB. A, SL. 4649 T. P.R. C. T I / ( L.U.D. = RETA/L COMMERCIAL-) ZONED C-3 I I Gc SHUNAIL CORP LOT J. G. ALLEN Ne CAB. A, P.R. T. a. U.D. = RETe ZONED / 1 �/ fL / 5' CURB - / i ; ( GENERA TOR > W 1 INLET O o k s I — TRASHG r W 3 / c 1 j O�;l DUMPSTER \ / / f, 5' R q. W ,� ,, , 1 � _ �, ��� r 3 BLOCK 1 DEDICA TION�'�� LOT , �c\ .p (LUD =RETAIL COMMERCIAL) � •� i 15' DRAIN*£ & ' � M UnL/FY EASEMENT t . n 1 /� `l'c,�y OsA { ZONED C-2aG��L1 CAB LA l' o'\ y PROPOSED / ��RE55 i P.R. T.0 T. � /- -s 1 , J O�" 1 — STORY BUILDING PGG ��� III �,� .:E''� T �' i ; �� 21, 573 S.F. ' ,o Pe I I i , - >, 1 `r I�/ Y� FF = 658.55 G i i G `� - r7.5' UTII EASEMENT / ', y USE.- PUBLIC SAFTEY 1 CAB A ",ISLIDE 981 1a. T P.R. T. C, T O TO Bf ABANDONED ii 41 P. Iwo G, co _ 9S �6 \ \\ 5 f7 2 •CpMMOH NT QJ �` `Y : / \� \ m / i SrO �, �'SA 5`/ PG \�C� 2 / i 6 8 ' L r 'T , V / p / I\ ,� COMMERCIAL` CC£55 EASEME � = ry i � , ���E \ T�/ � ''«_ � 'r- \ � P\�Pc�\0 ,!�� p5� O PUBLIC A - --- :r�; \, F` 1 >� E� R o r �5. 1L OQ � `. �. CC£S5 ,>< . \ \ -r \ d� � 0 • P ' , 5 . � / Qi G �T3, — ; 0 t', `sue' ; .�� O G P �0 g /gyp / G� A ifz 4 �� QS To R '� �' '` / LOT 6, BLOCK 1 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING / t ti Au 4 j\ sro b �? /,� e PHASE 11 %' OJFaGR/ P 5 �� , ; �,1b' - e"' �� $_ / CAB. A " SL /DE 2425 ` �Q ��' �?' �� /.- ; f P.R. T C T `. � (LUD = RETAIL COMMERCIAL) %�, .�...•� •. �� �•r 1t, � 'i i.'�`� � + ` �� 4 E � c�, � � / !� " ZONED C-3 Ij T 2R, BL 0 1 1, (L =RETAIL COMMERCIAL ► � `\ / \`,, '•. � x •. ` / 6 \ ZONED C-2 \ / /GG .r' Jg -t1 i i W D k G� P5 `0� p, i �' g I +D D w , \ \ /% , P 55 �, 5� 1 s �E� \ ' LOT 5, BLOCK 1 PG6 110 ;/, �/ G l� ��;/ SOUTHLAKE CROSSING _{ .� /' P �A rs `\ _`i - '� PHASE 11 L,.:I <, =ti'� CAB. A . SLIDE 2425 I / / PR. r.c.r. z ` TEXACO GAS STA 110N P (LUD =RETAIL COMMERCIAL) 1 �I LOT 1, BLOCK 1 O 3 F' �� /j ZONED c- �a m 91 W f z I COMMON FRI VA FF OPEN SPACE FENCE 1 NO. 3 & DRAINAGE ESMT. RD NORTH MATCH E 1ST1NG) �� 69 SCHLOTZWKS DELI MYERS MEADOW PHASE I/ RYA B T ( �9 1 LOT 1 CAB. A, SL. 2160 BUS 10'- EA;EhfEN EPG \69 I P.R. T.C. T. UTILITY 4' y. W. R. EA VFS HAROLD SAUNDERS 15' DRAINAS 1QE 2833 P'R' C. . .,'�,; `''': "�- GGE�5k5 Q° NO. 500 ADD177ON p1 VOL. 7232, PG. 428 ) ('L. U. D.-MEDIUM DENS/ TY RES/DEN 17AL ") CAB "A , = _ - r- - P �CAB. A, PG. 2833 Z ZONED PUD r, , �\ 1 pL P.R. T. C. T. I D.R. T. C. T. _ \ . (L. U.D. -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ( 418• F)8 \ .JG (LUD RETAIL COMMERCIAL) .. , o W � ,. E IIIN. , - - = - - "� A iE �\ \ � ZONED C-2 ZONED AG r- - D00 L Ay/(S 79 • 4 �00 tJQ --'_Y -1 t� 1N ET �• \\ \ co 69 METER POLE 5 GA AN N PR y - LPc \9 91 EASEMENT GROUND pUEAPE SCREENING _ Y:...i_ _ i 10 ;�'J' sc\ �• �\ S5 ASEMENT 5 UTILITY L fDE 1 yV1 LAN - _ _ ' - _ -A O 16 , 98 TN FW -i . . RCP — \ �.`. \ -� O. \ GG 3D' DRAfN SLIDE g$1 CAB A S 4.60, a ' ;t'r' ` ,..�; R ' PROP 18 r — \ \ -r�A� �� \\\ 1� P �2j�k5, / / CAU P •T. , N - __- t 1'' t PH ��\ \\`, `ram ` f 8 J. Z3 w _T - - �i ; SD.... �T� RCP — INE SLOPE 7 % rr_ �� i ,i t t W P•OP 24" R CT TO 4. 1 ILDfNG �\ \ `\ \ \ / k 22.5' M 9 _:..• M= --- __- _ PROPOSED 8EN1N 7• l 1 R r A R — S�SACK FOR B I HEIGHT Y A\ \ \ �� \\` f/ �SP SONRY SC s�_ _w — ROP` 8 W — SE E MA 20' �E STOR �'o_ \ \' X 'C T �A WA( -►- _ P ' _ _ MOR THAN 10' 1Nf E s,<<._ ..,._ _ n TY \ 0R MOREs�G \ •: \ R ,/ // / 10 UMENt RCP u-) EASE _ -- CTs� p OP. _ — CONC P FF = 658. JO _ 8' MASONRY �'P SCREENING WALL 15 �E / \'� • �\ ,' / y G / W J W / m CORNER ADD177ON _ ,' to CAB. A, St. 961 E P. R. T. C. T. / / W1 vi (LUD = RETAIL COMMERCIAL) / ` ZONED C- 2 J 1 /'rr ry°/ �55 / 1 �' PG,�, i G�� P -,- ,' • 19 � , R �7 1` / x. o j 1D •.kt, ,lam, LO gT 3R, BLOCK 1 ;- SOUTHLAKE CROSSING X X LOT 21?, BLOCK 1 SOU77-ILAKE CROSSING PHASE l CAB. 'A' SLIDE 1613 P.R. T. C. T. (LUD RETAIL COMMERCIAL) ZONED C- 3 i PS��E01�0 1, d G& / GM qG- S / O4 /i s / / /i LOT 4, BLOCK 1 fi SOUTHLAKE CROSSING ,� ,` j. PHASE /I �L i / CAB. A '; SLIDE 1614 P.R. T C. T. j' (L UD = RETAIL COMMERCIAL) ZONED C-3 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 SUMMARY CHART — INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape Area R of area in front and side Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Groundcover (Sq. Ft.) Seasonal Color (Sq. Ft.) Required 6,472 S.F. 75% 13 26 162 971 129 Provided 6,472 S.F. 75% 13 26 162 971 129 *Note any a. credits used in calculations: LOT 3, BLOCK 1 SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERYARDS Location/Required/ Length Base Linea Provded Length Buffer d Width T;e Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Fence/Screening Height do Materie North - Required 565' 10' - B 11 17 56 8' Screening Provided 565' 10' - B 11 17 56 8' Masonry wan East - Required 200' 5' - A 2 4 16 None Provided 200' 5' - A 2 4 16 South 1- Required 380' 20' - 0 15 11 53 None Provided 380' 20' - 0 15 11 53 West 1- Required 191' S' - A 2 4 15 None Provided 191, 5' - A 2 4 15 South 2- Required 337' 5' - A 3 7 27 None Provided 337' 5' - A 3 7 27 West 2- Required 362' 10' - E 4 7 29 None Provided 362' 10' - E 4 7 29 *Note any credits used In calculations: a. b. Other Comments: LANDSCAPE AREA do PLANT CALCULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED WITH SITE PLAN LOT 7, BLOCK 1 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING PHASE H CAB. ASLIDE 2425 \ P.R. T. C. T. \ (LUD =RETAIL COMMERCIAL) ZONED C-3 VICINITY AiI NOT TO SCALE LEGEND PROP. STORM SEWER LINE — — — — — — — PROP. SANI TAR Y SEWER LINE PROP. WAFER LINE PROP. INCAND LIGHTING FIXTURES WITH DESIGNA 77ONS BUFFER YARDS FL — - - — ........ PROPERTY LAVE EA5 urivT LWE ...... BUILDING ........ ASPHALT ' ^' . CONCRE7E X — X — ........ FENCE LINE ........ GAS LINE — B SS— ........ SANITARY S -WR LINE MXM=x ........ STORM a NI UNE —e W — ........ WATER UNE —550-- ........ £xrsnNG cowow uNE — ........ OVERHEAD POKER 550.5 ........ CAIS77NG .SPOT ELEVA nOW e ........ POKER POLE 1/27RS / 1/2 RF ........ >/7• v ROD SET / FOUND ........ TREF ........ Slav FIRE LANE 0 ....... WATER MAANVOLE 0 ........ 7REPNOIVE MANHOLE 0 ........ SANITARY SERER MANHOLE ® SrTJRAl St KW MANHOLE ® ........ GAS MANHOLE O ........ LIGHT STANDARD T WATER VAL VE ........ WATER METER nv, ........ FIRE HYDRANT �u ........ CLEAN OUT ........ 7ELEA4ONE PEDESTAL .. ........ h%WGA POV BOX ........ 7RAFFIC SIGNAL 1°b ........ TRAFFIC SIGYVAL BOX ........ GAS METER wo ........ GAS VAL VE '°'• ....... BOLLARD NOTE. 1. NO OUTSIDE STORAGE IS BEING PLANNED 2. ALL LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH LIGHTING ORDANCE NO. 693-8 S/ TE DA TA SURMAR Y SPEC/FICA 77ON LOT 2R CONCEPT PLAN LOT J SI7F PLAN EXIS77NG ZONING.' C-2 & AG C-2 & AG PROPOSED ZONING.' C-2 S-P-1 W1 CS USES LIMITED TO PUBLIC SAFTEY FACILITY LAND USED DESIGNA 710N.• RETAIL COMERCIAL RETAIL COMERCIAL GROSS ACREAGE- 35 8I J SF 176,614 SF NET ACREAGE. 35 81.3 SF 174,812 SF SI TE CO VERA GE. NA 21 573 SF 12. 3% WITH *T F. 28 459 SF 16. 3%f AREA OF OPEN SPACE.' NA 92 581 SF 33% WITH *T. F. 68 207 SF 397t BUILDING AREA: NA TOTAL: 21 573 SF Off ICEIIEMPL 0 YEE:• 12 903 SF FIREBA Y.• 8 670 SF LAND USE: RETAIL COMERCIAL 35 813 SF PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC 174,812 SF TOTAL FLOOR AREA. NA 21 573 SF W1 TH *T. F. 25 493 SF f PARKING REOU/RED.• 25 SPACES 50 SPA CES PARKING PROVIDED.' 25 SPACES 50 SPA CES NUNBER OF PROPOSED LOTS.' 1 LOT 1 L O T IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE.' NOT TO EXCEED 70% 82 231 SF 47�' WITH *T. F. 106 605 SF 617. f * I./-. = IKA/NING tA(,'L//Y LO MMARY CHART — INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape Area x o n front and si Canopy Accent Tr oundcover (Sq. Ft.) Seasonal Color (Sq. Ft.) Required Provided *Note any a used in calculations: LOT 2R, SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERYARDS Location/Required/ Length of Base Line Provided Length Buffer rd WidthrT pe Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Fence/Screening Height & Material North - Required 147' 5' - A 2 3 12 Provided 5' - A 2 3 12 East - Required 191, 5' - A 2 4 15 Provided 5' - A 2 4 15 South - Required 228' 20' - 0 9 7 32 Provided 20' - 0 9 7 32 West - Required 208' 5' - A 2 4 17 Provided 5' - A 2 4 17 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. b. Other Comments: �-•� �SITE PLAN W. •`• *OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1 10- ••••�•--••••••••�•----=• CITY CASE ND. ZA00-047 � FANG ` AND '�+• 14 CONCEPT PLAN OF DU LOT 2R, BLOCK 1 CITY CASE NO. ZAOO-048 OF THE CORNER ADDITION W.R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 500 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS RE D J 2000 0 WNER: ENGINEER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RAYMOND L. COODSON, JR., INC. 667 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE 5445 LA SIERRA SOUTHLAKE , TX 76092 SUITE 300 L.B. 17 (817) 481-5581 DALLAS, TX. 75231-4138 (214) 739-8100 0 20 40 80 (214) 739-6354 (FAX) SCALE. 1"--40' DATE: JUNE 1, 2000 LOT 6 DRAKE ADD117ON VOL. .J88-124, PG. 68 P.R. T.C. T. LOT 7 DRAKE ADD117ON VOL. 388-124, PG. 68 P.R. T.C. T L 0 T 4R2 J. G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADDI77ON CAB. A, SL. 4649 P.R. T C. T. XX LOT J. G. ALLEN Ne CAB. A, P.R. 7 i I COMMON l VA TE NSPACE NO 3 &DRAINA GEESM T. ! I MYERS MEADOW PHASE l/ CAB. A, St. 2160 P.R. T. C T. > \ . • 6,58.7 656. I x `f r" HAROLD SOUNDERS i� �' AU 4x 8, - \�5.,,� 658.2 - .•. VOL. 7232, PG. 42e j xssz.s.; .. A18.6 , x ) D.R. TC. T. 4 / .. ..�...,�,. ♦ p % , , . _N 7g 5' OQ 652,J,.1 ii _ 656.4 �,•-tom ` �: ?t - l t of %,51.44� / f 655.E �j Q 65. 658.0 641 654.3 c33liS ` ?... �1 4. 23 E N ; f'-._-- - (' 7� --� __ t fit, <0 t / N7g-24 O . -, _---mac- :__ !wt"'�t t t �t 1 654.3 x 58.5 fPa f _ -- JX _ - _ -� tf i } • • 65� 4 6 6h t 657.5 658.3 t INLET `,. 63.7 �-'•S_ x 55 56 658.5 00 ! 64�•pa"",-''"� i 653.3 tr 6 ( �, 658.5 `3 658.0 - t TOP= 65Q OQ^ 652.2 6 2 349. 455.4 b5 I t FF: 658. J0 f , .` I t � � ''" / sso 1 ` t0h : �� '/,• / ; \ 5�� 0 6 � � • `, 657.E t p � 658.3 658. •3 "651.7 �' ' -- ' \ h5? 658.3 l ! - 658.55 3" CURB 7RANS77701V J 3} I l t � I �• t CONST 5 CURB INLET ? '� � r �,�� ...5. { 657.4 i. � x.5.`at. � FROM 6" 70 L!' 9 BLDG 651.5 I / ` TOP=654.40 FL=6 0 40 R� ` tt _ £49 sal 6�h t / 658 5 .658.5 658.3 i \\\ LOT 1 CON T GRAY\ INLET W. R. EA VES TOP=65 .50 FL \ 652.50 NO. 500 ADD/77ON _>� \ CAB. A, PG. 2833 •: n ` P.R. T. C. T. SCHL OTZSK KS DELI f 656. $ \ \ v+ `' ^ i S �s a 9.e4 x i V. •i 1 lip. I ; f 6M.. 4 1 ' i'' \�\ G , 6 LOT 3 r�i I f E t- r hS sat. s 658.1 Xi } r !t a�N 6 x t. 658V A C.q 65 56 658.3 PROPOSED BUILDING 657. i I G 1, .4 FF- 658.55 / s8� !6 658.55 AV%! 1/ +� f > 1 •'sso92 `rs ,5 px61 10 58.2A�CI�ITY 658.2 4�x t f ✓ i�` ,. h ` 'e./ •✓1 1 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1'-40' .._,,. ,�./ 6 � t .,h � 1• #..3s! � �� ' T'� � � yg•,`- 6 / 058.0 ; 6 G /.:,ice G �.. __ t; LOT 7 BLOCK 1 - t 1 658.0 C T 10 CURB /N ET n: I tifs.x1 -� - - 111 x / S6 ;, �69 6� %r=i. T =657.60 FL=6 J 60 \ x ; /a•>P. ?9 s49.,: 6y 6 658.3 f S y 45 7� xs .sr%� BENC40RK ,f3 •- ._ ...._ 0 �AL 05 • i l l �/i i 1 xF :� x 4�r bh / j'' i'' • 6 EE4N 15, LAI t L 2R 1 ! 6. I I; x f J 1' �, �, , to T. cr, i 6�� tri rUV t! t7'�1` ......._... .... _ MA Tad f /S1t O ' / u CURBIG l TEXACO GAS STA TION / / f _ L 0 T 1, BLOCK 1 �1 5;x ID. • / ; �� -�i ��� i CORNER ADD/TION-50 ' ` j r CAB. A. SL. 961 T. P.R. C. / i ` � T, •� v � -t� \1 � �� � ol t / '/ � x3 „ I / ;*✓. �r LOT4, BLOCK 1 PL SOUTH E CROSSING ii G PHASE II 7 '( tti t �J• , , �w CAB. A, SLIDE 1614 y s i 1 IE l E ', .:� P.R. T C. T _ i l ��t , ;`x64�.., �,` /�•/ } 6A�t, i ,Y \ •., i �� 1 O i L 0 T 2R, BL OCK 1 !` SOUTHLAKE CROSSING -- e $/, PHASE Al CAB. ', SLIDE 1613 / X f P.R. T.C.T. r J �bGY 1/ SOU7HLAKE CROSSING PHASE 11 CAB. A SLIDE 2425 / P.R. T. C. T. LOT 6, BLOCK 1 )UTHLAKE CROSSING PHASE /l CAB. A " SLIDE 2425 P.R. T. C. T. GRADING GENERAL NO TES . All materials and workmanship shall conform to the City of Southlake standards and specifications, and to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction for North Central Texas, latest edition and the City of Southlake addendum thereto. 2. A# areas to receive paving shall be stripped to effectively remove all vegetation, top soil, and debris, if present. Debris shall be disposed of legally offsite. Topsoil shall be stockpiled for landscaping purposes. J. The contractor shall establish interior drain age s wales to remove rainfall from the site. Water must not be allowed to pond in tree grub holes. The site should be graded such that positive surface drainage away from the work areas is established and maintained at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond on the surface during construction. 4. The contractor shall provide for sediment and erosion control as required by the City of Southlake throughout the construction of the project. The filter fabric nets will be placed at the toe of slope or in the flow line of ditches and along perimeter of the project. Erosion control shall be used until landscaping is complete and ground cover is established. 5. All areas that will receive fill shall be proof -rolled to identify weak zones. All weak zones must be removed and replaced prior to fill placement. 6. Limestone or other rock -like moterials used as fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard proctor maximum dry density. No individual rock pieces larger than 4 inches in diameter should be used as fill. Additionally, no rock fill should be used within 1 ft below the bottom of floor or pavement slabs. 7. Fill materials should be placed in loose lifts, between 6 and 9 inches thick, and each lift compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as defined in ASTM D 698 at optimum to +3 percent above optimum moisture content. Each lift should be inspected and approved by a qualified engineering technician, supervised by a geotechnical engineer before another lift is added. 8. Testing is required, and shall be performed by o laboratory approved by the engineer/owner and paid for by the owner. 9. It will be the responsibility of the contractor to locate and protect all public utilities, in the construction of this project. All manholes, cleanouts, valve boxes, fire hydrants, etc., must be adjusted to proper line and grade by the contractor prior to and after the placing of permanent paving. Utilities must be maintained to proper line and grade during the construction of paving for this project. � E/0NE L6 98 1..- TH EIT ` f �' O, BOK 1 SUHAE COSN HSI NA. A " SIE 22 .. T. ' LEGEND 685 PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVA 77ON 650.50TC PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA 77ON 650.00G - - - - ........ P1 OPD? rY UVE ID ..».... WA 7ER MANHOLE ...... EASLIIENr L/wE m »...... TELEPHONE MAW"MAW".. .... .. BfALO/NG OVLD 0 ........ ,SAwrARY SEMER MANHOLE" • .. ........ ALr 0 ........ 57ORM SEM W MANHOLE _.. CONCRETE ® M ANFifGLE X - X ....... FDVCE LINE q ..•..... UQY SrAMT STANDAA RD GAS UNE -C SS- 5"FARY SENER LIRE r ........ WATER VAL 1•£ ........ 3aXX)QQg » ».. S70RM M-WR UNE • n,o ........ WATER METER ........ fw HmRANr - 8'W -- ....... WATER LANE Co, ........ GLEAN OUr -5.50- ........ D1S77NG COW R7UR LWE "a. ... PEDESTAL --HE. ........ 01•ERHEAD POMER ., ...... RRnA770m .... /RR/GA770Yv BOX 0........ POIER POLE � •....... TRAFFIC SIGNAL ........ O1/Y AIR£ 1/27RS / 1/17RF ........ 1/2' IROYv ROD SLAT / FOL11f1D '� "6 ........ 7RAfT7C 57GNAL BOX TREE s.•, ........ GAS METER G•/S VAL W T ........ 576W ". ........ BaLARD C (D d 0 0 0 LO v Lb 6i C 3 U) 3 CD 0 M 0 i t.o 0 m 0 0 i EX SS MH TOP= 1.3 FL = 639.50 LOT 6 DRAKE ADD177ON VOL. 388-124, PC. 68 P.R. T C. T. LOT 7 DRAKE ADD177ON VOL. 388-124, PG. 68 P.R. T.C. T. L Or 4R2 ✓. G. ALLEN NO. 18 ADD177ON CAB. A, St. 4649 P.R. T.C. T. LOT • ✓. G. ALLEN NL CAB. A, 5 P. R. T. i ' I 1 I �1 I Q� 1 � 1 I 1 a i LL: 1-12 x8 TAPPING SLEEVE 1-8" VAL VE 1-8" 11u• HOR/Z BEND 0 �J O 6 M HAROLD SAUNDERS VOL. 723Z PG. 426 D.R. T.C. T. l 0+00 LINE Sl'_ 0+74 EXIST LINE A " i CONST 4.0' D/A SSMH OVER EXIST B SS LINE EX fZ 8 "=641. 79 FL 6`= 643.80 e 0+00 LINE 'S'= 1 +85 EXIST LINE A " CONST 4.0' DIA SSMH OVER EXIST 8 SS LINE_ EX FL 8 =643.16 FL 6'= 645.20 , � 418• 68 COMMON PR/ VA TE OPEN SPACE NO. 3 & DRAINA GE ESM T. MYERS MEADOW PHASE ll INSTALL: 1-8 x6' TFE CAB. A, St. 2160 1-6" VALVE .r EX SS MH P.R. T.C.T. 1-FH 7.E \ FL=646.19 Woo .000 A_ t \ LOT 1 W. R. EA VES NO. 500 ADD/ 17ON CAB. A. PC. 2833 P.R. T.C. T. SCHL O =KY'S DEL/ N I r ...:......:....._ ` s � / t _ i - '~ \ `\ INSTALL • / 1g" RCP 1-8" 45' HOR/Z BEND 1-8" llj( HORIZ BEND / 81.23 E N _�- - 1 _ _T.-- — — — — — \ \ r N79'2 _--�- - - _ _ _ i \t 1 • 24" RCP INSTAL - — �• \ ,''% \ ,• 6G / FF= 658.30 \ ,,�,,, f/ i / RCP71 Ty iu f / _ — — EA SEMEN 1 '' t \ \, ' j / f — t / j `` LOT 3 .4 / . f INSTALL: �t 1 �' 74E ' i , `` �"\/ / / j/''/• / SLEEVE" TAPPING I I , : \ ` / , PROPOSED BUILDING % 10' CURB INLET f 1-8" VAL ►F IRA ti / \ / FF-658.55 2" DOM / / I .. FA Cl�l TY \ / 1 ' A <\ '2' IRRG �.. 1 op t ty W/2 " METER i All " i i �Q ' 4+ • INSTALL: 1-2" DOM SERVICE TAP / R / / , • W/2" METER —2" IRRIGATION SERVCE t� E t • / i / / TAP H71H 2" METER '`V°► A.f/ 0ell „4i INSTALL: 2 1-8 x6 " TAPPING SLEEVE j f / 1-6" VALVFCIN IN L D T 2Rw ;' a - LOT 6, BLOCK 1 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING PHASE # CAB. A " SLIDE 2425 j j/ P.R. T.C. T. I I i �j 11 ; 't Z,P j , , //• fi � RELOCATE EXIST FH I i , \ t •..'- 1 .j \\ /i \' � f ill jj YN CIO III , Cj i \ ✓' / x' %/ III � i • • w �l 1 �tt\ \/ / � ,s � • � ' 41 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 I i ►' t ,� ,''' / J 11 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING i 4 i ! PHASE # CAB. A" SLIDE 2425 fj 0 j j� P. R. T. C. T. I i I TEXACO GAS STA PON _ LOT 1, BLOCK 1 ' /P G� CORNER ADDI77ON X~/ CAB. A, SL. 981 / P.R. T.C. T. 1 , / x '/ 0 4_46 xx X. 04 i 18 G I / j- LOT A BLOCK 1 AL "� // SOUINLAKE CROSSING PHASE # /''' ,''' /// T'" /, ¢•L CAB. A" SL/DE 1614 P.R. T C. T. II IL /j �4 A 7 4 \ // 4 /j / LOT 2R, BLOCK 1 SOU77-ILAKE CROSSING PHASE / CAB. A SLIDE 1613 P.R. T.C. T. 0 20 40 80 SCALE- 1 40' L 0 T 7, BLOCK 1 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING PHASE H CAB. A ' SLIDE 2425 P.R. T.C. T. UTILITY GENERAL NOTES 1. All material and workmanship shall conform to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction for North Central Texas latest edition, and the City of Southloke. 2. A# water mains shall be PVC water pipe class 200. J. All 6' through 15" wastewater mains where PVC pipe is used shall be ASTM 3034 (SDR-35) or ASTM F789/D3212. 4. The maximum allowable trench width for all pipe through 12" diameter shall be 32" BENCHMARKS: BENCHMARK 01: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE G.P.S. MOONUMENT IJ3 ON BOB-O-LINK DRIVE ELEVA 770N.• 657.38 BENCHMARK f2: "x" CHISEL MARK SET ON BACK OF INLET AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHLAKE BL VD. AND RANDOL MILL A VENUE ELEVA 710N.• 646.70 BENCHMARK "x" CHISEL MARK SET IN NORTHWEST GUTTER OF SOUTHLAKE BL VD. APPROX. 780 fEET NORTHEAST fROM CENTERLINE OF RANDOL MILL A VENUE ELEVA 710N.• 655.98 SHEET NO. 9 12 WATER & SANITARY SEWER PLAN DPS - WEST FACILITY PH I LLI P SWAGER ASSOCIATES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS RAYMOND L. GOODSON JR., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE NOTES FILE NO. RLG RLG 6-1-00 1"=40' 0306WSS 00 306 W PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND II I II II . f. CANOPY TREE / II I N) II IZTH• I � + / �UF�ERYA�D N0 0 0 \ II ORNAMENTAL TREE \ 4 � SHRUB II O 5HRUB / / TYP. — _ + II ° o GROUNDGOVER / ti ORNAMENTAL TREE NAL COLOR _, / 1 •� • I � � v� \ \ — — ' 1 _ — — — — — pw 5EA50 30 29 28 — ° _ GANO EE r 1 — ° _ 5HRU15 \ TYP� — — — ►} + o — TYP.— \ 34 0 AMENTAL TREE To / i Ile 1. LI \ 1 ` p I J- ole115 W _ - �' 110 114 — 09 11 \ 4 15 Ei I 1 _ ' 62 1 1 17 \107 108 1 1 0 - 1 1 \ �OoO°G 0 !� WM I► I r ,� ,06 1 1 s \ 1 °o°O00 �\ ° 1 1 1 1 1 i �, � � � I I 1 105 1 1 � ` %' \ - _ • oo°, its r—i 103 \ o° 9 V II I I I 1 II I I I CANOPYTREE0 20 1 �, \\ �• 1 1 1 I I \ ' o°o GROUNDCOVER M i II I I TYP. 1 \ 1 °° TYP. o o /. I ,00 p1 \ CANOPY I 0 p 0 • • / i - \ 1 �1 99 \ \\ 11 1 Y /il 11 1 \ \ + • + ORNAMENTAL TREE C P/ • . / 1 0 U, II I 1 I 97 \ 1 1 \ o o � I 9e J I 4S o C. , . \ o \ \ I \ ° oo O ° ° �■■�� °o 0 oo I 1 O II I I 1 / to 94 T 9i� \ ( / _ ' / \\ \ \ \ 5HRUB GROUNDCOVEP o r TYP.T)T0 0 0 0 /° o 1 ./ /� \ ,/ / r ��0 000 0000 �° 90 89 \ — \� \ \ o 'o 000000 � —• QUO o � � 51�O �, t' �� \ c o 000 "' .,00 IA 54 8 o / O O II I TYP. .I \ / \ \ 5EOLOR X�ONAL -- ° ° . + C�sI I \ / / � TYP. r. �°o o°o� 124 / \ \ • . ICI �� `.��► ,.• �� ! . • �.WIMIN ILI 766 \ �O /� i \ 54 / O '• y71 \ /75 i ' II I I Mo 67 \ \ / / II \ \ ORNAMENTAL jR1=E 1 . HRUB II I I TYP CA TREE II I I \ TYP. (,)63 p I I \ // s V %�� / / v �� < • v / / / it I ORNAMENTAL TREE I � \ I // Davi a dwln , nc, Landscape Architecture and Planning 5744 Richmond Avenue Dallas, Texas 75206 Ph: 214/821-8100 Fax: 214/824-5562 Sheet Title: ORNAMENTALTR \\'\ \\ \//^, /// \\ // �- LANDSCAPE II I TYP. \\ \\ \ \. , G ,' Q` �0 P L AN \'r / CANOPY TREE \\� -� ' \ \ \ \ � � / / y � \ � !' � Pro j. No. II I I I \ TYFI.\\ Date: 6-1-00 , G � Drawn: RWS (0 LANDSCAPE PLAN Checked: DCB r. r • V Approved: DCB II , I I • ; \\\ f SCALE, 1 20 -0 o s II I / // \ FO 12000 sheet number ` �'� L 1.1 �, KE. 5 H EET L1.2 �'SS1 / / of sheets LOT 3, BLOCK 15UMMARY CHART - BUFFERYAR05 Location/ Length of Base Line Required/ Provided Length WtdthlType Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Fence/5creening Helcpt t Material North _Required 565' 10' - B II Il 56 8' Screening Provided 565' 20' - B b O a O a 112 8' Ma .011 East Required 200' 5' - A 2 4 16 None Provided 200' 10' - A b. 2 3 13 50vth I - fired 255 c 20' - O q 6 30 None Provided 25b' 40' - O b. 1 a. 30. 30 West I- Required Iql' 5' - A 2 4 15 None Provided Iql' 5' - A 2 4 15 South 2- Required 3-3-7' 5' - A 3 1 21 None Provided 33"1' 5' - A 3 1 21 West 2- Relquved 362' 10' - E 4 1 2q None Provided 362' 1 20' - E b 3 6 23 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Exist" tree credits used to reduce the amount of canopy trees provided. b. AUIlGant is proposing to double required width of bufferyard and receive 20% reductlon or required plantings. c. Drive wildth subtracted from total length. Other GOn►Tents: LOT 3, BLOCK I SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LARP5GAPE Landscape Area % of area in front and 51d Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs 6roundcover (5q. Ft) Seasonal Golor (5q. Ft) Required 6,412 5.F. 15% 13 26 162 qll 12q Provided 101,588 5.F. 7596 17 0. 1410 300 I,B85 300 `Note any credits used In calcuiotions: a._ Existing tree credits used to reduce the amount of cano9A trees provided. LS'TO BE SANAMARTMOVEMI LOCATION NO. GAL. NAME CREDIT Buffer (B) or Site (5) LOCATION NO. GAL. NAME CREDIT 5 I. 8" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 63. 6" ELM ! I CANOPY 5 2. 8" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 64. ELM I GANOPY _ 5 3. q" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 65. ELM I CANOPY 5 4. II" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 bib. 10" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 5. alit ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 6i. 10" ELM 2 AGGENT _ 5 6. q" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 68• bit ELM 2 AGGENT 5 7. 8" ELM TO REMOVED 5 6q. loll ELM 2 AGGENT 5 8. 14" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 -70. 8" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 B q. 10. 8" bit CEDAR OAK TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED 5 5 71. 72. alit 7" ELM ELM 2 AGGENT 2 AGGENT 5 11. 16" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 73. q" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 12. 6" HAGKBERRY TO BE REMOVED 5 74. 8" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 13. 8" 13015' D AR.( TO BE REMOVED 5 75. 15" ELM 3 AGGENT 5 14. all OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 76. 8" ELM TO BE REMOVE 5 15. 8" OAK TO BE REMOVED _ 5 7-7. -7" HAGKBERRY TOBE REMOVE 5 16. 7" OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 78. 7" ELM TO BE REMOVE 5 17. 8° OAK TO_BE_REMOVED 5 7q• 12" PECAN TO BE REMOVE 5 lb. roll _ OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 80. 22" ELM TO_ BE REMOVE 5 Iq. 6" _ OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 81 • 8" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 20 roll OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 82. 10" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 21. 6" OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 83. 15" ELM 3 AGGENT B 22. 21" ELM 2 CANOPY S 84. loll CEDAR TO BE REMOVE B 23. 6" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 85. 8" ELM 2 AGGENT B 24. II" ELM 2 AGGENT 5 86. 8" ELM 2 ACCENT B B B 25. 26" OAK 2 CANOPY 2 AGGENT 2 AGGENT 5 87. 8" ELM I CANOPY 26. 27. 6" 10" OAK ELM 5 5 55. 8q. 6" b" ELM ELM G_AO I CANOPY _ g g - B 28. 2q. 30. 6" 7" 7" ELM ELM ELM GG NT _ 2 AGGENT 2 AGGENT 5 5 5_ q0. all. q2. 6" 24" 6" HAGKBERRY PECAN_ CEDAR I CANOPY 2 CANOPY I GANOPY g 31. roil ELM NOT USED 5 q3. 21" ELM 3 AGGENT g 32. 15" ELM 3 AGGENT 5 q4. 8" ELM I GANOPY g 33. 14" ELM 2 CANOPY 5 _ q5. 14" ELM NOT U5ED 34. q" HAGKBERRY TO BE REMOVED 5 qb. 15" PECAN NOT USED g 35. 22" ELM 2 CANOPY S q7. 27" PECAN NOT USED 1336. II" ELM i CANOPY S al8. roll ELM I CANOPY 3-7. q" ELM NOT USED 5 alq. roll ELM I CANOPY B 38. 10" ELM NOT U5ED 5 100. 17" ELM NOT USED g 31,11, q" ELM NOT U5ED 5 101. 8" ELM I CANOPY 5 40. 7" ELM NOT USED 5 102. q" ELM I CANOPY 41. 30 ELM NOT USED_ 5 103. 17" ELM NOT USED g 42. 24" ELM NOT U5ED 5 104. 8" ELM I CANOPY B 43. 20" ELM NOT USED 5 105. l0" ELM 2 AGGENT g 44. I6" ELM NOT U5ED 5 106. 6" ELM 2 AGGENT g 5 45. 46. 30" 7" ELM 1 ELM NOT U5ED I CANOPY 5 5 107. lob. 8" 6" ELM ELM 2 AGGENT 2 AGGENT 5 47. bit ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 IOq. roll ELM 2 ACCENT 5 45. 15" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 110. alit ELM NOT USED 5 4q. 6" ELM T REMOVED 5 III. II" ELM NOT USED 5 50. 11" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 112. q" ELM NOT USED 5 51. 7" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 113. 12" ELM NOT USED 5 52. 7" HAGKBERRY TO BE REMOVED 5 114. 15" ELM NOT U5ED 5 53. 6" ELM TO BE REMOVED 5 115. 11" ELM NOT USED 5 54. 7" OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 116. 8" ELM NOT USED 5 55. roll OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 117. 7" ELM NOT USED 5 56. roll OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 115. 10" OAK NOT USED 5 57. 6" OAK TO BE REMOVED 5 119. 13" ELM NOT USED 5 58. q" HAGKBERRY TO BE REMOVED 5 120. 7" OAK NOT USED 5 5q. 30" OAK 2 GANOPY 5 121. 12" ELM NOT USED 5 60. q" HAGKBERRY I CANOPY B 122. 7" OAK 2 AGGENT 5 61. 12" HAGKBERRY I GANOPY B 123. 26" ELM 2 CANOPY 5 1 62. 12" OAK I CANOPY _ B 124. 8" ELM 2 AGGENT 125. NOT USED COPYRIGHT 2000- PHILLIPS SWAOER ASSOCIATES GALVANIZED STEEL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS T.O. PLA-EZ 0 I zo FIN. FLF. 12 8 Vz _==wdENv__ n COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES 12 Q8 8� 82 12 PAINTED WOOD o FASCIA TRIM COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES "CORDOVA STONE so 12" ALUMINUM SIGNAGE 11 II II_ -MOUNTED PIN MOUNTED ' 1it1&1 1;AV Aia►n1;Al. ►ate=/ai `f riK 4MAZA, Itatiii�/�1.�1:1i�1�;i11 • i1���i1 r1.•...itl�il��� ria±ate-�.r-,��nl■�n�■_ ; .SOLDIERS ...... _.....:� 12 12 COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES PAINTED FASCIA TRIM �— BRICK VENEER CORMITI �iM Wz/__STONEDOL LE11 DGE VA REAM" IIIIIitMlll IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIillil' ii '-^ __��-- h�:'p1111UItI11111111111111111U11f111111111111111111111,anwan IIIIMIIIiilllltl I flii IIMs�:1 too BRICK VENEER—' STAINED CEDAR--' OVERHEAD SECTIONAL "CORDOVA CREAM" DOOR STONE ARCHES AND KEYSTONES "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE - SPLIT FACE MASONRY SCREEN WALL "CORDOVA CREAM` STONE WATERTABLE "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE ARCH AND JAMBS "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE - SPLIT FACE "CORDOVA CREAM" — STONE TRIM WEST ELEVATION ro SCALE: I/O 1.11_011 II II I I II II II II II If II II II _— PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: %11.1'-01' I — PLAN NORTH 12 , 8 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS (ANODIZED ALUMINUM FINISH) WITH BRONZE TINTED INSULATED GLAZING TRUE NORTH 111-7" 1-1 12 GALVANIZED STEEL 18 GUTTERS AND \ DOWNSPOUTS 13'-6" T.O. PLATE N FIN. FLR. ''CORDOVA CREAM" STONE - SPLIT FACE D ;IS 9- v 10 - r * �,Z4)pf 01 PSA\ PHILLIPS SWAG ER ASSOCIATES Architects Engineers Manners 7557 Rambler Road Suite 670 Dallas, Texas 75231 (214) 692-6115 (214) 692-6118 (FAX) Sheet Title: WEST ELEVATION Proj. No.: 4156.10 Date: 6/01/00 Drawn: DIL/DRS Checked: JAM Approved: jAM sheet number Al JUN 0 12Q0 of sheets COPYRIGHT 2000- PHILLIPS SWAGER ASSOCIATES I T.O. PLATE T.O. _PLATE FIN. FLR. 0 "CORDOVA REAM" STONE LEDGE Innuunuuanu un uounununnnlunuonnnuull Fills liar�f l su =i i i "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE ARCH AND JAMBS COMPOSITION SHINGLES Q12 8 12 8 BRICK SOLDIERS—\ M =I VISION ol 0,0,01 all M BRICK VENEER L ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS (ANODIZED ALUMINUM FINISH) WITH BRONZE TINTED INSULATED GLAZING 12 12 Q 8 8� PAINTED FASCIA TRIM p ���Q s 8 "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE - SPLIT FACE n .�SOUTH ELEVATION "J L% SCALE: %8"-1'-0" ''CORDOVA CREAM" STONE TRIM - --- - -- 249 -6 _ n� PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN U I 1 SCALE: Ye"-1'-13" GALVANIZED STEEL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS BRICK VENEER PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES PREFINISHED PAINTED GABLE LOUVER FASCIA TRIM BRICK VENEER "CORDOVA CREAM" 812 12 8 T.O. RIDGE STONE LEDGE T.O. PLAT 12 Nzzz:� _ - N8 -- COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES BRICK SOLDIERS "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE ARCHES AND KEYSTONES 12" TALL PI OUNTED— UMINUM SIG E 10" TALL PIN MOU D— UMINUM SIGNAGE - . .•�. 111l11111'NIIIIIIi111i11{t111Iii1111111111111111111111i11111111111t111111111111111111t111I1 III "=� IIIIIIIIIII �11 �•� _I • � �• Ii llllil IIII II ©■� a I STAINED CEDAR OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR "CORDOVA CREAM" — STONE - SPLIT FACE ''CORDOVA CREAM" — STONE WATERTABLE TH�j+ cc 4` 7k . pF 1 PSA PHILLIPS SWAG ER ASSOCIATES Architects Engineers Planners 7557 Rambler Road Suite 670 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 692-6115 (214) 692-6118 (FAX) Sheet Title: SOUTH ELEVATION Proj. No.: 4156.10 r: Date: 6/01/00 Drawn: DIL/DRS Checked: jAM Approved. JAM sheet number A2 JUN U I �uuu of sheets a. t COPYWiT 2WO- PHILL PS SWAGS o'. T.O. PLATE 0 cV GALVANIZ' GUTTERS DOWNSPO T.O. PLAT FIN. FLR. li Vf[VVY/1 Vl\Llvvl STONE WATERTABLE DOOR 0 0 02 01 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: I/811-1'-011 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/e"-1'-011 r-. %HF-J, I I I U 19'-411 -- ---- - PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH ANIZED STEEL -RS AND SPOUTS T.O. PLATE K VENEER 0 Eo FIN. FLR. 1VA CREAM'' - SPLIT FACE REn vii A 1 too0 H W w NA PHILLIPS SWAGER ASSOCIATES Architects Engineers Planners 7557 Rambler Road Suite 670 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 692-6115 (214) 692-6118 (FAX) Sheet Title: EAST ELEVATION Proj. No.: 4156.10 Date: 6/01/00 Drawn: DIL/DRS Checked: JAM Approved: jAM sheet number A3 of sheets C0PYRIQHT 2000- PHILLIPS SWAGER ASSOCIATES T.O. PLATE 0 T.O. PLA .0. PLATE ro t aJ FIN. _FLi BRICK VENEER 12 ��, 12 8V QS 912 8 PREFIN ISHED ALUMINUM LOUVERS 12 GALVANIZED STEEL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS IlNllllltl i �. II liltt PREFINISHED— GABLE LOUVER 12 S STANED CEDAR OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR T.O. RIDGE : M BRICK SOLDIERS i 37'-4" COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES 12 Q 8 "CORDOVA CREAM" — STONE ARCHES AND KEYSTONES ''CORDOVA CREAM" STONE - SPLIT FACE 12 8V PAINTED FASCIA TRIM T.O. PLAT M cp "CORDOVA CREAM" / STONE - SPLIT FACE N COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES PAINTED FASCIA TRIM BRICK VENEER "CORDOVA CREAM" STONE LEDGE 12 1 8�8 8 � 8 COMPOSITION SLATE SHINGLES 1 1 \ ..-- 8 8 "CORDOVA CREAM" —y BRICK VENEER STONE TRIM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS (ANODIZED ALUMINUM FINISH) WITH BRONZE TINTED INSULATED GLAZING roa)_NORTH ELEVATION SCALE I/8"-1'_0" 247-B" n 1l PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN l-J 1 J SCALE:I/e"-1'-p'� SOLDIERSBRICK nnuuum �— Gal oil MIA uumnu DUMPSTER GENERATOR CEDAR PICKETS ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE FRAME • • SCREEN WALL PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH Pilo,,outhlok - s s � "CORDOVA CREAM" - STONE ARCH AND JAMBS "CORDOVA CREAM" - STONE WATERTABLE lzos� j 1100 13SA PHILLIPS SWAG ER ASSOCIATES Architects Engineers Planners 7557 Rambler Road Suite 670 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 692-6115 (21 4) 692-6118 (FAX) Sheet Title: NORTH ELEVATION 151-8" Proj. No.: 4156.10 Date: 6/01/00 Drawn: DIL/DRS Checked: jAM Approved ,1AM 'o 2000 sheet number A4 of sheets rt EXISTING COUMERC/AL ZONED C-,i FOU"'O S87'59'54"E -- -----� ..-------- 528.17' 00No i� - ---� i r----� ""tom.. 't � --I {-- r• i I ! I � i l i � � i f i -rt i ; � i � B�ttlIDt v�c L�N6 : 2 J 25' COM ON ACCESS ASEMENT a 6 16 _ _ 2 P UTILITY_ tEMP cARr 14 _ i 4 16 r l j -` -_ - - jM i --- { 3o `f LSE AG"�' --- - - _ & _ U77L TY E`ASEME*I- - - -- _ OT, 24 OW 24 00' I::.._ _ 2400• ... -" 24 00' ..-. _. = 24.00' 40100 24.low - 24.1 0' C=- _. _4A.b0 24,00' 49 24.1 t- STATE I�IGHIYAY No. 114 iVARIABLE RIGHT OF wq y� PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING / 7EMPORARY EASEMENT TO rH£ STATE 11 a5'- _ 1 OF TEXAS SHOWN ON S. H. 114 PLANS, s, TkpE [ANDSCAp "-- - SHEET NO. 14 " "F 8UF `3S-9 _ S85 N86 0442 ., E Tf � 198 69? E j . nvo Aoy. - 171. 63 6 SB.� • „E z~ 57,11 4 , ioj- 9 P 6 _ 4. 00' 2 Q• - - J - t1LIT `- - n FIRE LANE �� AO Y - _ 20.W 30 �0I I I j j 24-ar ` IL aoa S PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT $ 00 ,P� �, _ ►} 1'-- s Tom- - - - .o• P �!, � U t� l� :! i i J. 1t 24 FIRE LAN£, 'i0.o~ $ ," ACC & ESS UnL. ►� ri 8 N 9-0er EASEMENT 1' ,� �� ii � � f� �! li �� !►�I it � I 9 `-10 0' UTILITY i' j # �. _ EASEMENT 30 S+oEwALlcs.am _� -- ---- BUILDING _ -ft EMERGENCY ENTRANCE/ Mp, _- Exrt EXIT I TIRE LANE 162Sti' , ' 70,000,I LN 6W 15p i ILLI oILA- m 4- U LLJ a , J 'GATEWAY 1 PROP6SE0 PLATA .ADDITION o of PHASE II L 1 ­4j 1P91 � 1 z �" ' _ 3 'LjIT z �M a 2_ I P P. ,s; , t o I I^ } �, ._. LOT 2, BLOCK 713, 084 SQUARE FEET l I, I l �1 ®:,> ,.__ I ry R � - �°• d _ , 3.00' 16.3702 A CRES TEMP. CART 30' UTILITY EASEME 7 -+- EMERGENCY - ORALS (1YP•) N -'-I L- z y,r 'r, EXIT µflr%• CAB. "A" SLIDE 455 552 1 i 22 lI z l ILD�A LO E4NIiE B. VQGL _a JOE &-Z'IARUL SUE ME- W 24.0(Y .. ( i J i I - AND GL YNDA M. KIRKLAND _ .- I l } t1 1 i C0 -.r + O VOL. 8T78 PG 847 EX/S7ING L OWES = - W Q - - 30' FIRE LANE, ' i 10.00 8 uao t0. �$ D.00 13.ov ro {, I l I L.U.l7 ' MIXED USE ZONED C-3 0 1 ACCESS & U77L. Tip'' ' p I LU.D_=RETAIL a w 1 a -- - -4 1-- Q I -- ZONED AG V ` EASEMENT EMERGENCY tL I (I I fl p , - COMMERCIAL to Ex1t _ ! } (# : i' I i i I t ;!$ �' f [ it [1 i[ Q { , P Z EZ' EMERGENCY Q i W I EXIT I I I sloEwALx $&6g PROPOSED CONCRETE s PAVEMENT I I L -, l POSSIBLE f1/TllRf GAS {f#fi I.. "t di, 6 3 SF o ¢PUMP suNo LocAnar ��._. EMERGENCY 1 STORY BUILDING ' I' 'I i ' 1' ` (► ' 2 ,0.00. O EX1T RETAILEMERGENCY EXIT i lay: !r 1 �--- 30' FIRE LANE, ACCESS oo130.W 32e,z.�oc 1 & UAUTY EASEMENT {I 49.a0 -_� �a oo'+ - 2 = 79'31 r - 1sso RR 565 00 L [ EMERGENCY P T= 86. 08 f / L= 170,85 j 1 1 I1nse' 8 UNDERGROUND GASOLINE I } - " EMERGENCY sloEwAL1c �9 I f CASEM N% � a 1 STORAGE STATION ` Q. r ' � / Cf�S-Nb8' 32 £ I I TANKS GAS Z EXIT 11 } l m CHD=17 0 30' FIRE LANE,A _J - l ACCESS & U AL- ' c", EASEMENT 8 ' -TRUCK _-. !TEMP. CART CORRALS 24' FIRE LANE, ACCESS R o 1"Sd41' 4j s•� - I DOCK 10 00' g Q. t I & URL/TY EASEMENT Al ER TRASH COMPACTOR p a 1 E j. Bt __ �_ -- / Q t 13 - � --- - � Q ;' I� i �I � I ( � � it � �131 �� g �. • v 77LI �{- r EASEMENT "f - P O FIRE LANE 1(3' MASONRY PROPOSED CONCRETE f �,,cy _ - 8' MASONRY oo' PAVEMENT - -1 SCREENING WALL - SCREENING WALL - J147Rr j s DO' FIRE LANE i i� S� 1 R 'J! i ' rO, Ur , --� 24" UrILfTY EASEMENT w. f eA ry 15' BUILDING LINE- = - _. - w r ek' - -- -- - --- - --- _ _ - - - - 4-� -- - - 10. 7/a evs } 2 p CANOP(NO , (ME V FED _ __ - _ - N89 -39 46 639. 5 - _ , E 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFERTYPE r o -� - 24' COMMON AC ESS A / - EASEMENT CAB. "A" S 447 _ 'f GLEN SCOTT HARRELL \ l RAREFY £A TON N VOL. 12740, PG. 498 12266, PC 16/ 0 �,• / ; � _ _ _ L.U.D. = MIXED USE ",. ZONED AG ,�� I CHUNG-CHENG AND ZONED AG -- -.• �_ � , : - LOT 1, BLOCK 2 ._,._..•_„ s. - - >� - - -- ANNA LIZ HONG - / MIXED usE } ,- 128 SQUARE FEET T °--`( - '� I�oL. r,T2O2, Pc. rso 182, \ I W L.U.D. = MIXED USE 4.1811 A CRES �. C- ZONED C-2 ^• \ a IN \, , CIO ZI / `? PROPOSED GATEWAY-. PROPOSED GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION �\1 _ PLAZA ADDITION PHASE II PHASE II"SP-2". r wZ)•`_ ....L. ,_.i._...L....:,,..L_. L..r..._r�,•+_•.-1 �+ +.. s �0. 1. ) � ' C \, 5ZWPED AREA SURWY \` w _11/ r , I _ l v IINC so GRAPHICSCALE C B 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. Cr oo� a OU m z t��YLL 0 0 �6 SOUTML�VCE BLVD. n FEN. 17M 0 z S! TE { fro 5� S.H. 114 N 0 i ui VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SUMMARY CHARTS - BUFFERYARDS Location Required/ Length Bufferyord Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening Provided (feet) Width -Type Trees Trees Height do Material North Required 914 25'-T e J 37 27 128 See Note 1 Below Provided 914 25'-Type J 37 27 128 See Note 1 Below East -Required 776 1 10'-Type B 16 23 78 1 None Provided 776 10'-Type B 16 23 78 None South 1 Required 640 5-Type A 6 13 51 None Provided 640 5'-Type A 6 13 51 None Required d 176 '- T e 10B 4 5 18 None South 2 Provided 176 10'-Type B 4 5 18 None West 1 Required 20 10'-Type B 0 1 2 None Provided 20 10'-Type B 0 1 2 None West 2 Required 770 5'-Type A 8 15 62 None Provided 770 5'-Type A 8 15 62 None NOTE 1) Where parking is provided between the buildin setback line and public -right of-woy, shrubs obtaining a mature height of three feet ?3') or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. SUMMARY CHARTS - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Required or Provided Landscape area (sq. ft.) % of Area in Front or Side Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Cover (sq. ft.) Seasonal Color (sq_ ft.) Re uired 74.332 75% 149 297 1,858 11,150 1,487 Provided 121,212 1 95% 1 149 297 1 1,858 11,300 1,500 LIGHTING SCHEDULE LEGEND 24' FIRE LANE VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER YARD •• INTERIOR LANDSCAPING O g DOUBLE POLE LIGHT Cj (SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE) (5S SINGLE POLE LIGHT (SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE) TYPE MANUFACTURER NUMBER LAMPS MOUNT WATT REMARKS O McGRAW EDISON GLA 91229AS-BZ-LL / MA1007 1-1000W HPS POLE 1070 35' ROUND TAPERED STEEL EPDXY FLAT LENS ENAMEL POLE TO MATCH FIXTURE. NUMBER OF HEADS SHALL BE PER McGRAW EDISON GLA 912293D-BZ-LL / MA1007 1-1000W HPS POLE 1070 PLAN, SHEET SE-1. FIXTURE SHALL PT FLAT LENS BE POWER PAINTED, ELECTRO-STATIC 12" EXTERNAL SHIELD APPLICATION. POLE SHALL HAVE A MIN EPA = 10 FOR 100 MPH WIND W/POLE BASE COVER. McGRAW EDISON GMA 402293D-BZ-LL / MA1007 FLAT LENS 1-400W HPS POLE 455 12" EXTERNAL SHIELD SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART GENERAL NOTES 1. BUILDINGS OVER 6,000 SQUARE FEET SHALL BE 100% FIRE SPRINKLED. ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES MAY BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS. 2. FIRE LANES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARDS. 3. HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PROVIDED PER CITY STANDARDS AND SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT, ADOPTED UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. 4. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIDEWALK ORDINANCE NO. 683. BARRIER FREE RAMPS, PER CITY STANDARDS, SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SIDEWALKS AND ALL CURB CROSSINGS. 5. MECHANICAL UNITS, DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE REQUIREMENTS. 6- SEE ARCH ELEVATIONS FOR LIGHTING AND SIGN LOCATIONS. ALL LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORDINANCE NO. 693-6. 7. BUILDING FACADES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH CITY OF SOUTHLAKE MASONRY ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST AS PROVIDED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. 9. ALL MASONRY SCREENING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIALS SIMILAR TO THOSE USED ON THE BUILDING FACADE. SITE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE LOT 2, BLOCK 2, GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION, PHASE H 18.37 SITUATED IN TIE S. FRIMMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525 AND THOI[A.S EASTER SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 474 CITY OF SOU 7E AKK TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JUNE 13, 2000 OWNER.- PREPARED BY _ COSTCO WHOLESALE O� __ 00 Mone Ptozc W► Steriin Va. 20166 1 ? t ^•,_ ...••` - .. ' •+,.. 12m00 Park Gr752 Utvc, Suite 18W Fox No. (972) 770--1300 2D �• R 3) 4 - Da1MA t.xo. TS2'SI Fox No. (972)238-3820 9, �`- o (703) 406-35 P of3 Gas p _" �� CITY CASE NUMBER ZAO -045 ,: a Sk, ..3. N EXISTING ZONNiG: AGRICULTURAL (AG) PROPOSED ZONING: SP-2 W/ LWITED C-2 USES, PLUS OUTDOOR DNMG, TIRE, BATTERY AND AUTOMOBILE ACCESSORY SALES AND GASOLENE SERVICE STATIONS. LAND USE DESIGNATION WXED USE GROSS AND NET ACREAGE: -� 16.37 ACRES/ 713,084 s.f. NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE 21% AREA OF OPEN SPACE 159,386 of PERCENT OPEN SPACE 22% AREA of iSIESVIOUS COVER - 56111,699 *.1. PERCENTAGE IWPERVKMS COVER: 78% PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 148,663 a NUMBER OF STORIES 1 MAXIMUM BUILDMG HEIGHT 30.50' PROPOSED FLOOR AREA 148,663 at REQUIRED PARKING 7" PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD 732 HANDICAPPED 13 TOTAL 747 REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 3 PROVIDED LOADING SPACES 3 AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE NONE PERCENTAGE OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% L% o c> ro�1 m i �.. 0 r� N4 cv v cv �.... _ o 0 • X 71 CO CD ""'.. �iC CIO 0 p oN u-) cr 0 x a � a � �" 0 N �. w ►� A rA W A� 04 aAo� Oaaw Oa�H O� U U 0 © 00 -1! 3 M -5 m x W 7 -, cV t'� CL` v x _0 4.1 tti 6 LC3� Ul p v tU 0 p ") rh <, 2i U (n N 0 I_ n C7 C) 4.. G . M �2 0 D SHEET,' �C'p J U N 13 2000 rp• K ;i 3, U SOUTHRIDGE LAKE • FK•W...:.I...: rY7 I I I Q v I �-t I I I c-) I I I I Jcl:� I I— LLj a� w I I o f--- OLdO z0 J�v RdW— N N w o I o I rT 0 w Y (n �Q©..Q......I...:IU J o�m In I I I I N 0 6 1 6� ...... ......... I. I ,'2„ I I I o I I I I I I Q V) w Ln U co Y I +� I c Q �� I " 0 _j � � waC) I I I I JOw monm�z I I I c�Q%Qw�O 1 l 1 __ �� N �-- F- I I a O > JO w Cn I J ' Lj-r a I T o U t-•t I I I J co I I I I I II U� I I __j C�m:2 I I Ld JCL I _jJ I .....................I.. w I Q N J I I Y (� w �l 2 w i -J J = 11 w Q I Ln c'Ti 02: I F-7 N : I lz Q . k. I I I I F„+ I ( I I I I W tz ►� Liram' Ld dx t �Uw ^�I LD:ooE I I ` Z c� Ld O 1 0���I: 101 1 a Lj v UmN 1 F-I I ca 00 Q n1 at I a?�I I 0 0 / J LdI _ QF— Qoa�Oo ND 1I aE€ I I oN )c� 1 p N o" o" W I: }: W: I— 7iU N� II NLd I J,ml I o Lo � w caw Imo:>I I o 00 irL) Iw zl I F- cnco a I m'•W IJal I T o =o Q V)13- _jo I�14 I = J. 7i .. / J � O O N p Q O - — \ ZONED — PUD #3 WATERFORD DRIVE E LUD = MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �.� . BLOCK 7 STONE LAKES PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 10' utrl Esmt CAB . A, S L. 915 o N / s o z EXISTINb 6' HIGH 0 PRIVACY FENCE x ''III — — — — -:E STING 6' HIGH �� S� C LJ L_ S00° 05'11"W— — 608.57' :10' ut;; :E — — — — f I VACY FENCE U U U BLOCK 7t -- — --- ---- �— /21PF '—' YY _ 9 I:I w 1':1 �Q1 1- D94I NAGS BUT1_L ESIdT I v` 40' BILDING LINE 5, utilEsURVILINEAR I I 29R CONC. SIDEWALK 1222 ' 1 33I 27 �/ 5 d . f 0' Ut l Esmt 10' Ut I I Esmt ' 10 11 21 „ ....� — - / 28 I�: I S r TONE LAKES PHASE ' 00 CAB. A, S.L. 679A 36 c m I EXISFUTURE TI.I`1G 6 HIGH 7�j, " ►"'�„ "°°6�a° i o gin° °. I �� I:I II PRIVACY FENCE 34 .' 35 : 'art — ILIPF — S00_47 05 W�.s� utu�s� 759.78' W — _ -� �'' ---- I--- -weep 00 ° 434. Imo• LPF -' - - - - : : DRAT NAGE -gTpr °�`— — . �`' Utti Esmt w ----- 9---------------- -- - ---- 1-� N, - DING LINE _P.O.B. N � I I• h J -J SS SS SS en I . ..� ...... .. II i T EN x ....... �� BLOCK 2 :: I' P A E 3 ......... ... 'I DE NT II \S FUTURE ::' i :: i P D I P P.AC E. I: II •• • SOFTBALL FILL II OPT 1 N ,• 'I S-N V9 s- 7 ::::u r I. :: I PHASE 3 -AU 0 II CAB. A, :SL. 2575 F 8 m ::.... x .I ® �: :: -NOV99 •.•�. ••MASE��� � I ? F- G 00 � I 24 S FUTUREHU ADDITION ADD If I ONI r- 91 D z m PpV• DUMPSTE W/ ' 8' HIGH SCREENING WALL AR ALK &10' x50 LOADING ����� G� EXISTING P� HIGH SCHOOL 1997 5 ADDITION r al A N - - NAd �• MEMMOmm :::.................................... •�� W: AN 13: :.� • • ' 1 • • .. oil 1 �•1 ....,. .:M R. a a a J � w • . • A. PHASE . 5• �` F-DEC2004'• . '%. -' •:fUTUFtE PARKFK6..':. 289.. SPACES* - . r "....: ....... W S00° 39' 29 r'W - 44:-7�' ;.. . . 0 ' Ll PERMANENT : LANDSCAPE EASEMENT- Q .. S 9 8 MR4 9 -R-1 G 14 T' H A I A�IE-' FF — — a a INCLU 1 CLASS IIII a J EXISTING II FIELD II; HOUSE fi•I 1-STORY I , I I I I I I I I ' a f-IRE -L ----I • ; 5' UTIL TY I -- I , 1 ------ - - - - - -- o co06 ...................-..—...—................._......................... .... — — — N f7 C p �' .. .. — ................. r B.J. FOSTER URVEY:.................................................................. V pN L o .....,..... ....... d U a -- W .... ........ ............ ......... ... . ABSTRACT -IV': 519 Q = 0° 11' 57" — — — — �11' �6' 5' 88' , _ 128' 1' �14 9 _ 18 a E I I I I R= 2799.79' Irll I �II�I O O O 3 NO Q N N V,� I L= 9.73 3c2 3C2A 006 0 CD O(D 01 O N a I I€ 006 p r J '`' w CB = N89016 33 E N, N 01�m°0a, N� 0"a�0c.0 cn� LC _ 9.73' ( ( TRACT 3C2 ONALD DAVIS "NN �� z z J z i I IE i ( 6555, p.501: ww�No ZONED s C2 u oo way o I, `� LOT 5 J noLLJ zo 30' COMMON ACCESS ESMT-�i �: J�OC U IV TRACT 3C2A 25 00 _ II II o II.............................. 26: EXISTING 6' HMI GH II PRIVACY FENCE' - I - = I ...........F ............27 C .......... ....... ..... N 28 o ........... —_ — 10' u tti Esmti 2 9 n* 1 m Iv E 30 D - II o I z � D II ...........,---/............. �(7 »« I D 31 I I z F_ € I00BLOCK 2 r I il' I D ........................ 032 I�1 Ilce SHOT-PUT AREA: ........................ 33 5' Ut;I Esmt ^F I I i IPF 332' .......... ................... , .... r RAIL ..................................................... ......... ............ ......................... ....................... • • , ... ......... rn _................... V. 2-LANE ASPH. PA �F137 . .... ................ 0 (/) ``� • fix .... ................ �y 3�lIfTTE 3 2 1 3 2 1 0 —i 20 19 18 AKARD BLOC). 2 rn,� BLOCK 2' V.388-142,.100 °D p C BAKER ESTATES CAB A SL 2917 APPROVED PLAT SHOWING ROBERT GREENWOOD LOTSE 5 ES 6 I N V. 9040, p.600 ZONED — AG NOTE: LUD = RETA-RT CB MERCIAL GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 200 S ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 it. NOTE: Carroll Hgh School Addition = 52.893 Acres Tracts 1 & 1A = 3.207 Acres Right-of-way Dedication = 1.088 Acres Total Acreage = 55.012 Acres NOTE: L-- PARKING AREAS AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING SHOWN AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. TREES REMOVED FROM SITE PLAN PER CITY INSTRUCTION. ALL LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARD REFERENCES REMOVED FROM SITE PLAN PER CITY INSTRUCTIONS ADDITIONAL RIGHT—OF—WAY REQUESTED FOR PEYTONVILLE AVENUE WILL REQUIRE SITE REDESIGN TO COOFDINATE ACCESS. SITE ENTRY, PARKING CONFIGURATION+ AND LANDSCAPING TO BE: REDESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PROPOSED TURN LANE. NOTE: EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON SURROUNDING PLATTED PROPERTIES ARE RECORDED IN SAME VOLUME/'PAGE AS PLAT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EASEMENTS ON PROPERTY SHOWN IN ITALICS ARE FILED IN CAB•A,SLIDE 14609 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED OTHER EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE TO BE RECORDED WITH THIS PLAT. .a J pV PAINTED ISLAND ACTIVITY CENTER EXISTING PRACTICE FIELD 3 N10'x25' LOADING ODiscus PR CTI F I E L P ASE 3 / S-NOV99 / F-AUG 00 7 PHASE 3 S-NOV99 F-AUG 00 R 0 X100 ACCESSORY BUILDING LU GJUMIJ P E VAULT ME T(TY Q I • PF 1352.38: N00° 17'00"E P N SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 1255 LUD = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SURVEYOR -ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS 1 NG L I WOODED AREA 0 ZONED SF 20A LUD = MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SHW GROUP, INC. 9100 AIRPORT FREEWAY SUITE 570 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 (817) 281-0720 FAX (817) 281-0713 CONTACT: GARY RADEMACHER ARCHITECT/PLANNER TOTAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 800 W. AIRPORT FREEWAY HURST, TEXAS 76054 (817) 488-7732 FAX (817) 488-9708 CONTACT: MARK J. DANIELS CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL SITE DATA SUMMARY AND PARKING 2 STORY BUILDING INCLUDES: 62 CLASSROOMS 122 TEACHING STATIONS (ULTIMATE) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING = SP-1 LAND USE DESIGNATION = PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE (BUILDING FOOTPRINT) EXISTING 7% FUTURE 12% AREA OF OPEN SPACE(AREA LEFT IN NATURAL STATE/LANDSCAPE) EXISTING 1,649129 SO. FT. / 37.9 ACRES FUTURE 1,322,726 SO. FT. / 30.4 ACRES AREA OF OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE EXISTING 71% FUTURE 57% TOTAL BUILDING AREA INITIAL 159,662 SO. FT. 1997 ADDITIONS 16,513 SO. FT. SEATING AREA CAPACITIES: MAIN BUILDING: AUDITORIUM - 990 GYMNASIUM - 1400 CAFETERIA - 880 BASEBALL STADIUM - 735 SOFTBALL FIELD - 400 NATATORIUM - 1000 PARKING AND LOADING SPACES PROVIDED EXISTING STAFF/STUDENT 1196 INCLUDING 28 HC FUTURE STAFF/STUDENT 493 INCLUDING 5 HC TOTAL 1689 SPACES INCLUDING 33 HC REQUIRED LOADING SPACES = 3 PROVIDED LOADING SPACES = 3 TYPICAL STANDARD PARKING SPACES ARE 9'x19' HANDICAP SPACES ARE 18'x19' OWNER CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1201 N. CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 416-1420 FAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT HI VICINITY MAP REVISED SITE PLAN LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOO `_j ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF S )UTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, ' 'EXAS BEING AN REVISION TO LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAI ',ROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITON m TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1460, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT CO JNTY, TEXAS a AND ALSO BEING A 3.207 ACRE TRACT 0 P LAND AS RECORDED IN a VOLUME 13016. PAGE 435, AND VOLU ►1E 13016, PAGE 439, N DEED RECORDS, TARRANT CCIJNTY, TEXAS a AND CONTAINING IN ALL 56.100 ACRES OF LAND y SITUATED IN THE R.J. PA ) EN SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 1255, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS RECiN�r' �, 2000 m ONE LOT a JULY, 1999 CASE No. ZA 99-078 CD 0 REVISED 5130100 SHEET 1 of 2 0, PROPOSED SP-1 REGULATIONS Title of Project: Carroll High School Lot 1R, Block 1 Case No. ZA 99-078 Proposed Regulations Comments 1 Permitted Uses Same as CS with the following exceptions - allowing for joint use facilities with the City of Southlake. 2 Accessory Uses Same as CS, and adding natatorium, lighted tennis courts, lighted baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales running tracks, practice fields, and indoor training facility. 3 Specific Use Permits Same as CS 4 Development Regulations 4.1 Height Same as CS 4.2 Front Yard Same as CS 4.3 Side Yard Same as CS, except no zero lot line development allowed. 4.4 Rear Yard Same as CS 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS 4.7 Additional Development Regulations for Same as CS, except the existing high school educational Existing trees being saved along residential building uses lying within 400 feet of building and additions attached thereto shall emulate property lines will partially shield the single family residential zoning. existing construction materials, surfaces, and building from view and mandatory fire and architectural style. The proposed natatorium shall be safety external lighting will be directed away exempt from vertical and horizontal articulation from residential property. requirements and the requirements for a 4:1 height setback from existing residential zoning. 6' high screening device required adjacent to residential zoning. Site developed as a SP-1 requiring a site 5 Concept Plan No Concept Plan shall be required. plan to be submitted for additional development. 6 Effect of Concept Plan No Concept Plan required. 7 Site Plan Same as CS 8 Special Exception Uses Same as CS _ a a SURVEYOR —ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT SHIP GROUP, INC. 200 9100 AIRPORT FREEWAY SUITE 570 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 (817) 281-0720 FAX (817) 281-0713 CONTACT: GARY RADEMACHER SITE DATA SUMMARY BY PHASE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IIIA PHASE IV PHASE V Classroom Addition to existing building Landscaping Front Yard Parking Activity Building Practice fields Track Natatorium Classroom Addition Parking Gross Acreage 54.615 52.893 52.893 55.012 55.012 55.012 Number of lots one one one one one one Net Acreage 52.8930 52.8930 52.8930 55.012 55.012 55.012 Percentage of site coverage 7.6% NC 9.5% 11.3% 12.4% NC Area of Open Space 1,649,129 sq.ft. NC Percentage Open Space 71% NC Area of Outside Storage NA NA NA NA NA NA Percentage of Outside Storage NA NA NA NA NA NA Start Construction 8-97 5-99 9-99 7-00 1-03 ? Finish Construction 8-98 B-99 8-00 10-00 12-03 ? Proposed Bldg. Area 123,738 s .ft. NC +42,750 +34416 +13,000 NC Number of Stories one NC one two two NC Maximum Bldg. Height 50 ft. (existing) NC 34 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. NC Proposed Floor Area 163,012 HS NC +42,750 13,163 Field House +41035 +26,000 NC Floor Area By Use 176,175 sq. ft. Educ. NC +42,750 Educ. +41,035 Educ. +26,000 Educ. NC Total 176,175 s .ft. Educ 218,912 Educ. 259,960 Educ. 285,960 Educ. Required parking 610 NC NC NC NC NC Provided Parking Standard 846 NC NC +15 NC +394 Handicapped 27 NC NC +4 NC +0 oa + + Required Loading Spaces NC NC NC Provided Loading Spaces 2 NC NC +1 NC NC ARCHITECT/PLANNER TOTAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 800 W. AIRPORT FREEWAY HURST, TEXAS 76054 (817) 427-7500 FAX (817) 427-4708 CONTACT: MARK J. DANIELS REVISED SITE PLAN LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING AN REVISION TO LOT 1. BLOCK 1, CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITON TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1460, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND ALSO BEING A 3.207 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 13016. PAGE 435, AND VOLUME 13016, PAGE 439, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND CONTAINING IN ALL 56.100 ACRES OF LAND OWNER SITUATED IN THE R.J. PADEN SURVEY CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ABSTRACT No. 1255, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1201 N. CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 ONE LOT F 200� (817) 418-1420 CASE No. ZA 99-078 FAX (817) 251-6622 JULY, 1999 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 5130100 SHEET 2 of 2 FHRIDGE y.;.l... I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 13b' I I I I I I I Rbv I`y'• I I I I I l I I I ......I. C'4 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I r--4 i I 00 L0 17 L 0 r G W: C N N C p a 0 p O O E a O aN 0 O N O rn N -O 0 C a0 3 .U6, 0 TO ON O p O 00 Oa/ fn TO O CDO N E O p O o 0 d M W N O CCD N O O/ u00 'D O v0 O j d 30 WATERFORD DRIVE :f\ I.I........... BLOCK 7 \ 1 2 3 4 5 6 : I 1 o ut r/ Esmt I O 0 8 O O 00 00 ----------r- ----� L•i••1F-- 1 LOCK 7 C_ III 0�� 1o„W 60857tlffft 1/2PF-i .......... f 90 �... 2 9 R ' �- '- 1 �•• I'•' ♦ o �� �I ♦ I II:II 27 \ Ir / 33 12 22♦20 10- ut;l28I10' utll EA..63 11 21 I- ; •• , , 04, I 1 ............. . . I t i I c -C T 1 T)OI ; oo I.I I:I \ ♦\1 ' 34 .!` .?. I _ f .•. . ...: • .... r : -r n '7 n 1 i : I a•. n r / A 1 n /'1 A Z A -All �, 35 . ' IPF �5'_ l4t L-Esmt . . .... ............ ... �, - -7. 5 - UtN Esmt 23 I I: 24 I........................... . 25 I IIV 1 00 1 I4111 ' o I I C3 1 DRAINAGE AREA ........................ ... : I I 26• 1 B 1 D I 1 F I........... ........ H 27 I i 1 � ' 1 IF!LF 1 � J. ............ ........... ..... 1 P 28 1 R 1 s I 1 u - - - 1 x 10' utr / Esmt 29 : I Y 1 AA 1 Be 1 CC DO I. ........... ............ .....: 1 EE 30 I FF -o I............................ . DES ION POINT AREA tAoret) RUNOFF COEFF. C TIME OF CONC. To INTENSITY 1(5) Irvw INTENSITY MOO) In/h' DISCHARGE O(5) oft DISCHARGE 0t1D0) oft DESCRIPTION OF INLET/DISCHAROE 0.15 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 0.8 1.3 0.27 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 1.3 2.3 0.72 0.60 15 5.5 9.6 3.2 5.6 INLET CI-1 0.66 1 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 2.8 5.7 3.31 1 0.60 15 5.5 9.6 14.6 25.4 INLET C112 0.21 0.90 15 5.5 2.6 1.0 1.8 1.43 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 6.3 10.9 INLET D1-3 0.21 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 1.0 1.8 0.92 0.80 15 5.5 4.0 7.0 INLET 01-4 0.21 0.90 15 5.5 1.0 1.8 0.11 0.90 15 5.5 E96 0.6 1.0 0.21 0.90 15 5.5 1.0 1.8 3.06 0.80 15 5.5 13.5 23.5 INLET 01-5 0.43 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 2.1 3.7 0.26 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 1.3 2.2 0.26 0.90 15 5.5 9.6 1.3 2.2 3.34 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 14.7 25.6 INLET CI-6 0.60 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 2.6 4.6 INLET CI-7 3.40 0.80 1 15 5.5 9.6 15.0 26.1 INLET CI-8 1.03 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 4.5 7.9 INLET 0I-9 1.87 0.80 15 5.5 1 9.6 8.3 14.4 INLET DI-10 1.56 0.60 15 5.5 9.6 6.9 12.0 INLET DI-11 12.33 1.16 1.32 0.80 0.80 0.60 15 15 15 5.5 5.5 5.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 54.2 5.1 5.6 94.7 8.9 10.2 CULVERT 'A' CULVERT 'Be 1.73 0.80 15 5.5 1 9.6 7.6 13.2 12.64 0.39 0.80 0.80 15 15 5.5 5.5 9.6 9.6 55.6 1.7 97.1 3.0 CULVERT 'C' 0.25 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 1.1 1.9 4.30 2.98 0.50 0.80 1S 15 5.5 5.5 9.6 9.6 11.6 13.1 20.6 22.9 OFF -SITE WLTIPLE SURFACE INLETS 1.03 0.80 15 5.5 9.6 4.5 7.9 INLET CI-12 31 NOTE: DRAINAGE AREAS AND CALCULATIONS BASED ON Z PLAFORNBY AREASYI & MSREEVISEDSBYSHEET 2.5, THIS PLAN ANDBAREEASEEEE$TFF (0 BLOCK 2 �-- ADDED BY THIS PLAN. im ....... .................. L,,I 32 to Ic:) �_...................... ' 33 I7.5' Uti/ Esmt I 1,2'IPF ............................ ............. --------- --�----�-p -------- 0�-------�. 7smf 18 = 2799 79' W 1 3 2 1 _ 20 19 I R = 9.73� ? I II I 3C2 3C2A 3 2 <0 CB = N89 16 33'E \ I �Mz BLOCK 2: 4LC = 9.73' LOT 5 C LOT 6 CAB. A, SL.2917 APPROVED PLAT SHOWING LOTS 5 & 6 W R FAVF`; AnnITIM1 SCALE 1" - 100' 0 so 100 200 TEMP. B.M.: B/C CORNER OF PKNG. LOT SW CORNER OF W. PARKING LOT 40' E. OF ROADWAY PAVEMENT ELEV. = 667.59 Ci) W U O cn W � w O O w � f'V 00 1 �o w HH�z C)o �zwz�, vo O 0; QU') 3� z wd c \ off ?�Z) a :F-: V1 W o: y. m : coo cji'- zC°o �•ao/ W "; 0 0 W Lu Lo W >-• Z d m O Qoo ww Q N Z 0 Lu V) O to W H 0 _ z H Q Q Wk 0 co O Cn o W - U I_ X QQ cf) z w W I-" � Q z U Li cr L1J U Q Q U � z J Q W � LL1 0 LL_ Q 0 a- 00 zz LU Q cn Q :D Q CC z 0 J Q J 0 m Q U N I O W Q J o V) W c 3 CA U ll 0 0 0 U w a 0 r m 0 Z SHEET C C C � � a � � 3 a in o, a w v v v a a a 0 0 0 0 m 00 ro a 00 O O OLO O N 00 to 00 00 00 O00 OHO O O^ o N� N c � N NO' (,4,o ,o Nr) N� O OO i 00 ap 00 00 <t O O OLD N N N 0W C OO Or NO) Nt NN O OCO O c v w Z a Q J N d O (n O _a 2i Q O� J C_ 01) d ; ON O / 3 U a0 / O O N 0�0 �2 C, d H N w O CD / O o+ 04 / 7 o' c 00 3 O N C O / O p 0 .0 N � -00 y OM N 0 O — oov p� N / 1 3 F. F. --� F. F. F. F. 40t-O'l PREFIN. METAL EAVE TR WEST ELEVATION MASONRY VENEER (TYP.) 3 X 7' H. M. DOO R CONCRETE STOOP 8' X 10' OVERHEAD DOOR IL 1/4 PREFIN. STANDING PREFIN. METAL EAVE SEAM METAL ROOFING SOUTH ELEVATION 2 \ 1/4 11-7 PREFIN. METAL EAVE ------PREFIN. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING TRIM PITCH 1:12 r------ 7- ,-� NORTH ELEVATION 1/4 loo'-O" F. F. E 40'-0" PREFIN. METAL EAVE TRIM EAST ELEVATION — 1/4 st - I ) — 0 CONCRETE STOOP 8' X 10' OVERHEAD DOOR cy� Of MASONRY VENEER D.S. (TYP.) 8' X 10' OVERHEAD DOOR re (n X 7' H.M. DOOR �, ; Q Lu CONCRETE STOOP ui RECD "t4 (12 Moo SHEET NUMBER A OF ELEVATION EL= 18'- 11" OL T, 0,,*V . "-v EL = 103'- 6 I ST, FL. FEL 100'— 0" \okL 8,0 V EL=98'-( 44 m 'r 0. w, (BEHIND) "EL=144'-7"` EL= 103'-6'* ELEVATION 5 ITE: NEW BRICK IN EXG. �14OCATION G. WIN004 BRICKS EX & GLAZED BRI0 MATCH RED BRICK COLOR & PATTERN TO EXC. REP BRICK COLOR, to .-PREFIN. METAL COPING Al Al i 6 CAS STONE SUPPER. SET ICUOPf R IN BRICK C RS AS INDICATED ou INa IN SCUPPER DTLS, TYP RCRS. SQ�DiER OND (7YP.) BRICK COLOR AT LOW WALL BEHIND NOTE. 5RICK COLOR. PATTERN,`-, AND C'OURS'NG -N DOORWAY NICHE. T A DAII INC wj.O.RAJLING L= 105'- 6* (A�G) PREFIN. METAL COPING 4�4 N RUN FACE BRICK 4" col PAST EXG. FACE OF ARCH 10 0 ENTRANCE. �Fou0000 0 Z AN 3 CIRS. SOLDIEP BOND (Typ') ELEVATION Vo A10 "SHADED" IMAG�S NOTE. M� EX" STRKTURES rlt2rr IL A tir'TAI T.O,V EL= 122*-6- T,O-M. EL= 113' _t_L —T t cr 1 ST, FL. EL= 100 3 CRS't 'S TIER IER BOND �, TYR, ELEVATION t + C49 ONE SCUPPER CAST 3TONE :'>�CVPPER if REF. 10/5-6 TYP. r REF, 10/5.6 TYP. nmr-f-v& A I Ar-r a. n neafn r"nf-r-la I Air -At 1_-I f I, t BRICK COLOR AT LOW WALL BEHIND T.o.m. AWN, EL= 118, -11 -,-w I ST FLOOR AIN EL=100'-Oo ELEVATION sz 1 ST FLOOR EL= 108'-8* K3 � 5.2 A3 T. -0. M. EL= 118'- 11 EL=103'-O* FINISH 01 =100*-O" ST. L. raw, ELEVATION .2 6 -1, ELEVATION CAST STONE SCUPPER REF. 10)/5.6 TYP, ZZC PREF4 UFAL (.,,0PlJ? fu 5•2 sm. (2 \,5 2 52 Ar% ELF 221' - 6' EL= I 1ST. FL EL= 100 -0'* KEY PLAN I k€Y PLAN REM MAY 3 MOO FUT IURE ADDITION OPTION 1 /8"=1.- o* ICY PLAN i ER SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 2 PREFIN. METAL CAP s.IrTAt n./'l(l(-IAIlacvnNIF) ELEVATION KEY ' 5.2 NOTE: 1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS (FACADES) ARE MASONRY VENEERED AND EXCEED CITY ZONING REQUIREMENTS. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT AND EAST FACADE DO NOT MEET ZONING REQUIREMENTS, VARIANCE REQUESTED. NORTH ELEVATION 1 /8„ N WEST ELEVATION 1 /8„ = 1 ,—O„ 4 .1 . . . - m- - - mlmwm m- - 1 /8" = 1 '-01, 0 0 0 N Ln r') m z p O CY) w z � Y LU O N _ C) U V OC Cf) Cn � W J W 0 O Lu Fm cn z o i- W Cn t� Z Cn LLJ Cm) 0 Z H Q LLJ CL ' C3 o W • Q cn 0 • Z -j J CC oC a wo CO) rir CIO) May 30, 2000 KYLE L. BACON REGISTRATION NUMBER - 12786 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE FOR INTERIM REVIEW AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. S Group Inc. Architects + Engineers SHEET Y � NUMBER 502 OF ___ SET NUMBER © 2000 SHW Group, Inc. t c i 10 rALO OU { { L at f fzRAYE"lR Y E ell L; i or 1ArlOrZ I �1' �9 ,., rtJ:R�t t �,r};.. 4 A is Vicinity Map OWNER/DEVELOPER LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST CHURCH Co Quesenbury. Pastor 2390 Lonesome Dove Avenue Southlake. Texas 76092 (817) 488-9568 SURVEYOR CLARENCE W. HART. R.P.L.S. Area Surveying Inc. 102 W. Tramme-II Street Fort Worth. Texas 76140 (817) 293-5684 Scale _ 1" a 50'_ - 0 SO 100 Lones�me Dove Estates. Phase II. BLOCK I. �ciblnet A. Slide 2792 Lot 28 Lot 29 Lot 31 ---f- Lot 32 _ (Base Bea r i n e r lot) 461 .7 I Ca inet A. SIic�279 Fence P�St , 10' Utilit Easem t S 89r58 ' 33;` E 9 P P � \ 5' Utility asement � N L 0 I . U N / I �U>� 2 10 U rI 00 p O• U-n -U�Q \ I E W \o1 0 (1) O Eo > � C1411 w O 21 aG� �s 0 S o 8 E I 5 P U At 2 � z� U � E�0�D W � I I3� 1 o � COo eery r� o I (Gao 0 O UN C J U +- O °--- � o S. Utility Ease /eRt -� Cab. A. e 1929 P.0 Existing 7.5' Una58.87 ityy Ease nt� V. 388-465. P. 48 NOTES: I. Selling a portion of Lot within this Addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is sub*ect to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. 2. The City. of Southlake reserves the right to require minimum finish floor elevations on any lot contained within this addition. The minumun elevations shown are based on the most current information available at the time this plat is f iled and may be sub -�Jl*ect to change. Additional lots other than those shown. may also be su 'ect to minimum f inish floor criteria. 3. There are no Lienholders with regards to this property. Existing 10Aerial Easement. Vol. 388-165. P. 48 00 100 �I 061 00 i" ) � � v U 0 m W c~n W 0 W W City of Southlake. Limit Line City of Grapevine. Limit Line e 0 c3o� Q °� 00 CV t� 0 N co SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION OWMER'S CERTIFICATE State of Texas } County of Tarrant } THAT WHEREAS. Lonesome Dove Baprist Church. acting by and throw h the undersigned. its duly authorized agent. is the sole owner of Lot I. Bloc I. Lonesome Dove Baptist Church Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 4813. Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas. and according to deeds recorded in Volume 234, Pa e 50. Volume 273. Page 76, and Volume 9239. Page 762. Deed Records. Tarrant �ounty. Texas. and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found in the West line of Lonesome Dove Avenue. said Point being the Northeast corner of said Lot 1. Block 1. said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot 32, Block 1. Lonesome Dove Eastate. Phase II. according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 2792, Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE South 00 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds West. along the West line of Lonesome Dove Avenue. 1002.85 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found for the Southeast corner of said Lot 1. Block I. said point also being the Northeast corner of Lot 17. Block 1. Emerald Estates Addition according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-165. Texas: Page 48. Plat Records. Tarrant County. THENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 44 seconds West. 459.39 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for the Southwest corner of said Lot 1. Block I, said point also being the Northwest corner of Lot 15. Block 1. Emerald Estates Addition: THENCE North 00 deggrees 47 minutes 45 seconds East 729.70 feet to a I" iron pin found for the No . east corner of Lot 8. Block I. Emerald Estates Addition. said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot 27. Block I. Lonesome Dove Estates. Phase I. according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1929. Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 29 seconds West. 269.99 feet to a fence ost f ound f or the Northwest corner of said Lot I. Block I. said point also being the �outhwest corner of Lot 28. Block I. Lonesome Dove Estates. Phase 11. above referenced: THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 33 seconds East. 461.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGiNNING and containing 416.987 square feet or 10.537 acres of land. NOW. THEREFORE KNOW all men by these presents: THAT Lonesome Dove Baptist Church act in9 by and through the undersigned. its duly authorized agent. does hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove decribed property to be known as Lots I-R-I. and I-R-2. Block I. Lonesome Dove Baptist Chrc�h Addition. an Addition to the Cit of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. and does hereby dedicate the rights o ways and easements shown hereon to the public's use. This pPlat does not alter or remove existing deed restrictions or covenants. if any. on this Property. Witness my hand at Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. on this the ------_ day of ________-__-. 2000. Coy Quesenbury. Pastor Lonesome Dove Baptist Church State of Texas } County of Tarrant } Bef ore me. the undersigned authority. on this day personally appeared Coy Quesenbury. Pastor of Lonesome Dove Baptist Church. known to me as the person whose name is subscribed to the fore- going instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpores and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. and as the act and deed of said church. Given under my hand and seal of authority on this the ____ day of ___-----. 2000. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I E o"� o This is to certify that I. Clarence W. Hart. a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas having ii co Platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the Date: I -D E m ground: and that all lot corners. and an points. and Points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground and that that made by me or Cl- this plat correctly represents survey Chairman: 0 I U N under my direction and supervision. s>� Z _ s P&Z Secretary: I o d- cv - I \ � \ ��s Vol. 11784. Pg. 452 LU m 0 Clarence W. Hart. R.P.L.S. Texas Registration No. 1600 APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 0 1 5 U.E. 15' Drainage Easement. z I Date: Mayor: City Secretary: Existin 10'x 30' E�osement V. 388-165. P. 48 EMERALD EISTATES Existing 7.5' Unity Easement Vol. 388-165. Pg. 48 . BLOCK I. Vol. 388-165. Pg. 48 ---------------------- Notary Public in and for the State of Texas. My Commission expires ---_--- Plat Revision LOTS I-R-1 & I-R-2. BLOCK I . LONESOME DOVE BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION, An addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. In the N. E. THOMP80N SURVEY. ABSTRACT No. 1563. Accordin to the plat recorded in Clinet A. Slide 4813. Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas 10.537 Acres Prepared April. 2000 Amended May. 2000 ZA 00-055 REC'D MAY 2 5 2000 THIS PLAT FLED N CABNET__--___. SLIDE ___ �o AREA SURVEYING, INC. DATE __ - Registered Professional Land Surveyors 102 w. T.amw96 &L . Fwt Wwtk. T-08 70440 . (017)20"4111/ I a o NO a o v 0 0�0 0 0 p NM N n Q o OI O o 04 In - Ool NL0 c' N, N o� o . o o ' o� Ca a o a o a � C N Z } N� / m= 0 00 O Lf) , r2 W n T N p r u N a O J : p � I 1 LUD = MED DEN ITY RE IDENTIAL \\ 10 UE 1 ZONED R-PUD No \ I \ \\ \ /0 o I NOAH B. POND o I - _ I _ - \ VOL. 7134. PG. 944 \ X __-- - _ \ Ln D • R • T • C • T • \ ��0 15 - - - - - - - W o - o \ \\ I CHERYL A. POND \ s / / 4 17 18 I \ 26 Vo1.12409,P9.825 \ \\ 7 S \,� OF I CD � 24 \ I / / 16 I 19 � c\I �' \ D R T C T. / \ BAILEE N I \ o SGPe UE I-------i LUD = MED DENSITY RES. S D. 298 & 2 9 9 0 yy \\ \ �P�O /�- I ZONED AG __ .� C B. A,� ___________ -- \ 8 �� P . R . T • C . T °1 0.w.) IO'UE--I UD = PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC \\ �p �i /S�& w TONED cs ^, \\ LORRA I NE DRIVE LORRA I NE COURT �50 R IFIRS-P BAPTIS \ '/ �.. � ., l 50' R. 0. W.) � I i CHU CH OF / 27 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH / 11 32 SOU HLAKE w9, AT1O1 a : OF SOUTHLAKE I w - - - V 1.124 9, Pg.830 '` 7$• "c`4 /a;,t -I LOT 2 / ; •� I p.R T.C.T. `1� � .. o O.W. KNIGHT I N46° 9' 5 "E e ID o ;; 33 NO. 899 ADDITION ��;�� /� I 34 _�---------- CAB. A, SLIDE 1459 41 • NVL RA 10'UE Ir "' 35 P.R.T.C.T. �! 14 ;'i w y J N .6 13 I ;; 28 LUD = MED DENS TY RESIDENTIA w I --y ZONE ' 22ASP RIVE ,�4 I ;; I jg�j u, op I D 4�,�,UD 01 --------- �� I ---- ----- o I 31 g I; ��°�' .a 1o'uE (�j 1 I I� 61 150 p' UE 00`` �0C� ��11' 26.57 --_=n ----- - / I I I �OQQV� A�Q�00 0/ PROP. _ !� ^ J 5�8 • I I 5 uE--1 0QP • O �`��`'IQ� ,o U.E. // , �\` 8 WI 5,8' IRF S89 14 05 E 435.47 �,e' IR �,5� 29 J ti�� 0 Q Cr)Q EX ST. I I I \ ^> O o Q 15� S•S•E. / oP . I • - -'- - ear _ - - - - an�ss- - 8' WIDE L �� I ► I C`` �L Q vP jP"� 0 O " Z VOL. 12445. _ ti J O /.i5a _ L. I I I �QO� �'��`"�° _ / � r / /�' 24' F IRE LANE-CO01 I-PV T 30' FRONT YAR �L 30' BUILDING L IN -PROP. • E. R - 1.00' 8. 5' of Q I / M _ L�111 24 I 'B ' S �� II II I �Q o'- aAAss FUL CES R - - - - - - - - - c� \ O / I - 5, I A M j 25 ACK I G = 483.O1 _ aaess Z I 407-29 ------ � �o ) I � T,Qq I I O-------- / i GRASS Q4s0----N90.00'0'T suss j o' UE I LUD = ME� DENSITY ES. ° RF 23 `9' NY a I DNS I I _ ZONED AG - _ - / 0.329 Acre R t-of-WaY oo� a -;- I z I� ------- -1 t-i NI RKING LOT I ass �0" �� 23 _ ] I ' - Ix cal ANTER ISLAND pA Pr) o \� I GRASS I 8 SQ. T. I R L f � � N I Q tc• J O • 50 . FT. 24 .73 S U I I I L.nI u o 1 1 C .. M '.':2�:� LC7 1 ms LOT W � -� '�•� Ili ne -u•t f N E (IN FEET ) 1 ilach - 100 if. GROSS ACREAGE - 16.081 ACRES ROW DEDICATION FOR S. CARROLL AVE.- 1.077 ACRES NET ACREAGE AFTER DEDICATION - 39.250 ACRES NET SQ.FT.=1,709,730 P/L CURVE DATA A = 46° 34' 03" 1 R = 315.00' L = 256.02' LCB = N23012'56"E L = 249.03' 0 = 42034i 26 2 R = 635 ° 00 L = 471.84' P ASS 2 � I I PROP. � aa►ss 0' U•E. n\ ` yo I 134 , PARK p� r ,I ` BLOCK 6. LOT1 , O . ; CAB A , SL�� 2 I I �'� W> �' PLAN MSLA I �\ 66 VERSAILLES I s• _<w, EXIST. 20 D•E•� I -- 2,22 So. FT. aa"ss OU T9 2= 1 \ o ' 0' U E I " VOL. 12445, \ A i GRASS I l 0 0RA55 CAB. A. S L D• 2990 i e' I PG. 1 0 1B. P.R.T.C.T. 1 I BUFFER "� �� �Va a 40 srazz j 40 SIDE YARD D , H GH WOOD I I Ln ,�o, h _ _ D 1 0 E 1 „,s _ _ ,�. ` �` ALL SIDEWALKS ARE CONCRETE ' 4V4.1 4P. s• It r h�-' 10, Ln I 1 I I o " 324.84' 15 U.E• A ING LOT a I GRASS d- li NB9 39 21 W '� N ° 4 TER ISLAND I POP. I J 175.00 I of r o LUD = MED DENSITY RES. --. I--v 124E , �' I'gu/ M �� 04 10' - - - - - D. cy"D� MASS--$r IQ 8' WI��R'AIL O I 10' UE-� I ZDNNE�pp SF-20B W I r G. 551 0 / ACCE S A. I o RZS.w. I �, I z1 I� j 101 1Y 't" LANDSCAPE DUFF R ESf� suss "" '' I FUL4 CESS 42 I 41 I EXISTING �� I , ` 0 PROP PL Y NG �a� - 125 TACKING 1 I ��� 1y I BLOCK 1 6 j 2 5' GRAM M, - I �C: I aFa` U 10' PED• F EIID PR h,� 30' RONT YARD GRASS PROP. ��' f I 8 W E TRAIL - - - - - - - � � 30' B.L. � c� =C) C" °1r ESYTSSI 1 �'T5 U.E. - 15' DE I JOE L. WRIGHT 30' UILDI T�l,INE ,GRAM OU.E. -T 70' R. • W. ----L-------I---------I VOL. 8030• n �o o` ni 3 - / 1 w J. W. HALE SURVEY + PG. 241 N cn c�Z :•� LOT 4? • �fto'uE ---- �I a. r p.R.b�.T.",� a •� --pr- _ - - « - M « «-« MCC- ABSTRACT NO. 803 ---ELIIC-K-T i----� y , .,� ----- _ - - - - - - a,'. u ��� � JOHN GIBBON SURVEY S-,,, ��` � BEGINNING 30' OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY is ; s._� 1` �s _ 20' PAE a ABST ACT N0. 591 ABST . NO . 8 99 _ _ �i-�-- T �"v"" '',� "� � � ' .�• 20' PAE � c a c u� HOLLINGSWORTH & BAf2NETT SURVEY p IRS c c c c a a a c c a a 82' R.O.W. T .H n--C� D 11►ITT c a a a ------ ABST. NO. 797 � c c I c a 2 c c a a c c a a --6r A-iW . , t-iz'�7 . c�-a fi�9 L - --� - - -{$7 �a�BL-GGK--�----- ►' WA R LINE ESMT. _ ------------------- 12 78 PG. 1�OT + --------------------C-t�-Iv1- ---- ----- �-- LUD ___ -6-6- _WCDENSY LOT 1 --�1- T _ a p -------- ------ ------ 1 15D. E. I I � i` � 5 �---- 0' u. E. o ZONE - R-PUD PLUM CREEK MANOR PAGE 1 7 1 ,0 � U.E. I,,, BLOCIK o I 2 40' I� - 0 I C I I n 0 LO VOLUME 388-1 61 , P. R. T. C. T. 1--5 1 . to'uE o I I "' m !�' w I p I I w bi Q° Imo m N If10'U.E. to'u.E. I I i moo_ m WARW I CK G o Z o� N N VARIAB , I--1 O'U. E. I I I C y'� CAB. ii �� SL I DE- PROP. 25' I �z /I j I I _- _A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O �-T-�1-_t�L.-UL-K- ------ 5, RESIDENTI L o o -, m / 'm o• EEN 5151 m N 1 5 0 , DRAIN. ESMT, m C) I �^ LUD = MED DIE SITY RESIDENTIAL I °' I �� I \\ I I \\ 'ymiz� t5'u.E. I �O \\1 �'� MONTGOMERY LANE Ln 1 \\ o --------- oQ cn ZONED R-PlD o' 3op i w IQ°v� �_� �% - - - -I 3 C S- T I=Q _ _ Is I I NOS O N R.O.W.l--- ----- ----- ----- -- --_--j ` CS1 \\ m I Im d C Z,,------- -- N BARLOW BEND o N ID I• . , o OHO \ 5' 25 \ 'o I la ��<m \? - �� C7 = - --L1- \ mm N ///���11 Q7 0 y� \\ \\ 1• ' v, I�5'u E , 1 =n----- --- �-p Z I } D� T I \------ - ��i11 N W �o Cn rnm o� o j\\\ -to �. D I - - - _ 0 1 m o\ \ 2 6 \ �Joo°ems Y /i oo fTI �A o c j- 25 D•E• / o �" 1 m A '�'`� \\ \\ IIII \ \ I I �PQ• F` /� IILn m C__I� m II I U. E' / I1 O i�D w I /R�o - - - - - - - - - - ---- \ / --- ---- � 27 \ \ \ \ I I I �O I I \ \ \ _ o \ \ II X, w \ II � f \ d II II I� I -� Cn 10 D- E I ; I I I cn N \ \\ \ I I I I 8. U. Er I I \ \ II I D I REQUIRED OR PROVIDED REQUIRED PROVIDED Credits: Other Cortments: SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AREA x OF AREA IN CANOPY ACCENT SHRUBS GROUND COVE SQE FT NAL COLOR (SQ. FT.) FRONT OR SIDE TREES TREES 20,550 sq•ft. 75% 41 82 514 3083 / 411 20,550 sq•ft. 75x 41 82 514 3083 / 411 r.IIRVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH Cl 192.50 51.76 C2 192.50 58.33 C3 192.50 71.79 C4 207.50 81.98 C5 192.50 76.05 C6 207.50 71.51 C7 207.50 62.88 CB 207.50 55.60 C9 135.00 86.86 C10 550.00 229.31 C11 450.00 30.38 C12 235.00 144.53 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S17°17145"W 139.14 L2 S00°04'05"E 164.02 L3 S01°09'53"W 146.30 L4 S45°56'07"W 21.30 L5 N00°04'05"W 164.02 L6 N17°17'45"E 139.14 L7 S02°26 49 E 389.15 L8 589°1404E 68.61 L9 N00°0405W 20.00 L10 S89°3921"E 178.12 L11 NO2°26'49"W 389.15 Li 2_ N89°14'C4"W 55.02 L13 N89°14'04"W 15.00 L14 NORTH 43.93 L15 N67°49'25"E 75.50 L16 S00°4555"W 16.19 L17 S67°49 25 W 59.33 L18 SOUTH 33.82 NOTE: A FOUR (4) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BREEZE WAY AND CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AS WELL AS ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE SCHOOL TRACT AND THE CITY PARK (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTAANDDSHALLLGRUNTTHEIDES OF LLENGTH OFTHESTING DRAINAGE CHANNELSCHOOL PROPERTY (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). SURVEYOR / ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT VLK ARCHITECTS 1161 CORPORATE DRIVE WEST SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76006 (817) 633-1600 FAX (817) 633-9600 CONTACT: STEVE HAFER T UCIVU 1 GJ DU 1 LU 1Ilu Lit I ■ DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON -SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: ALTHOUGH AN OPEN CHANNEL IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFERES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNDER- GROUND IN A BOX CULVERT. PER EXHIBIT E OF THE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOX CULVERT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL HAVE A BOX CULVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE SHOULD BE FIVE (5) LANES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL FRONTAGE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL THREE (3) LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS FOR THE STREETBWIDENING IANDRSE RELATEDTHESDRAOINAGESTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. UNTIL THAT TIME, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ASPHALT LANE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY ITS, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN FEBRUARY 2000. eWIvER CARROLL ISD 1101 N. CARROLL AVENUE SDU'THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (317) 416-1420 PAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 4-14-00 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN LOT 19 BLOCK 1 CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 16,081 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12785, PAGE 249 SITUATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY ABSTRACT No,803, TARRANT COUNTY, TQ66S ONE LOT APRIL 17, 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-026 SHEET 1 OF DRAIN. ESMT, m C) I �^ LUD = MED DIE SITY RESIDENTIAL I °' I �� I \\ I I \\ 'ymiz� t5'u.E. I �O \\1 �'� MONTGOMERY LANE Ln 1 \\ o --------- oQ cn ZONED R-PlD o' 3op i w IQ°v� �_� �% - - - -I 3 C S- T I=Q _ _ Is I I NOS O N R.O.W.l--- ----- ----- ----- -- --_--j ` CS1 \\ m I Im d C Z,,------- -- N BARLOW BEND o N ID I• . , o OHO \ 5' 25 \ 'o I la ��<m \? - �� C7 = - --L1- \ mm N ///���11 Q7 0 y� \\ \\ 1• ' v, I�5'u E , 1 =n----- --- �-p Z I } D� T I \------ - ��i11 N W �o Cn rnm o� o j\\\ -to �. D I - - - _ 0 1 m o\ \ 2 6 \ �Joo°ems Y /i oo fTI �A o c j- 25 D•E• / o �" 1 m A '�'`� \\ \\ IIII \ \ I I �PQ• F` /� IILn m C__I� m II I U. E' / I1 O i�D w I /R�o - - - - - - - - - - ---- \ / --- ---- � 27 \ \ \ \ I I I �O I I \ \ \ _ o \ \ II X, w \ II � f \ d II II I� I -� Cn 10 D- E I ; I I I cn N \ \\ \ I I I I 8. U. Er I I \ \ II I D I REQUIRED OR PROVIDED REQUIRED PROVIDED Credits: Other Cortments: SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AREA x OF AREA IN CANOPY ACCENT SHRUBS GROUND COVE SQE FT NAL COLOR (SQ. FT.) FRONT OR SIDE TREES TREES 20,550 sq•ft. 75% 41 82 514 3083 / 411 20,550 sq•ft. 75x 41 82 514 3083 / 411 r.IIRVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH Cl 192.50 51.76 C2 192.50 58.33 C3 192.50 71.79 C4 207.50 81.98 C5 192.50 76.05 C6 207.50 71.51 C7 207.50 62.88 CB 207.50 55.60 C9 135.00 86.86 C10 550.00 229.31 C11 450.00 30.38 C12 235.00 144.53 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S17°17145"W 139.14 L2 S00°04'05"E 164.02 L3 S01°09'53"W 146.30 L4 S45°56'07"W 21.30 L5 N00°04'05"W 164.02 L6 N17°17'45"E 139.14 L7 S02°26 49 E 389.15 L8 589°1404E 68.61 L9 N00°0405W 20.00 L10 S89°3921"E 178.12 L11 NO2°26'49"W 389.15 Li 2_ N89°14'C4"W 55.02 L13 N89°14'04"W 15.00 L14 NORTH 43.93 L15 N67°49'25"E 75.50 L16 S00°4555"W 16.19 L17 S67°49 25 W 59.33 L18 SOUTH 33.82 NOTE: A FOUR (4) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BREEZE WAY AND CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AS WELL AS ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE SCHOOL TRACT AND THE CITY PARK (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTAANDDSHALLLGRUNTTHEIDES OF LLENGTH OFTHESTING DRAINAGE CHANNELSCHOOL PROPERTY (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). SURVEYOR / ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT VLK ARCHITECTS 1161 CORPORATE DRIVE WEST SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76006 (817) 633-1600 FAX (817) 633-9600 CONTACT: STEVE HAFER T UCIVU 1 GJ DU 1 LU 1Ilu Lit I ■ DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON -SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: ALTHOUGH AN OPEN CHANNEL IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFERES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNDER- GROUND IN A BOX CULVERT. PER EXHIBIT E OF THE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOX CULVERT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL HAVE A BOX CULVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE SHOULD BE FIVE (5) LANES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL FRONTAGE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL THREE (3) LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS FOR THE STREETBWIDENING IANDRSE RELATEDTHESDRAOINAGESTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. UNTIL THAT TIME, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ASPHALT LANE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY ITS, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN FEBRUARY 2000. eWIvER CARROLL ISD 1101 N. CARROLL AVENUE SDU'THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (317) 416-1420 PAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 4-14-00 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN LOT 19 BLOCK 1 CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 16,081 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12785, PAGE 249 SITUATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY ABSTRACT No,803, TARRANT COUNTY, TQ66S ONE LOT APRIL 17, 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-026 SHEET 1 OF r.IIRVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH Cl 192.50 51.76 C2 192.50 58.33 C3 192.50 71.79 C4 207.50 81.98 C5 192.50 76.05 C6 207.50 71.51 C7 207.50 62.88 CB 207.50 55.60 C9 135.00 86.86 C10 550.00 229.31 C11 450.00 30.38 C12 235.00 144.53 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S17°17145"W 139.14 L2 S00°04'05"E 164.02 L3 S01°09'53"W 146.30 L4 S45°56'07"W 21.30 L5 N00°04'05"W 164.02 L6 N17°17'45"E 139.14 L7 S02°26 49 E 389.15 L8 589°1404E 68.61 L9 N00°0405W 20.00 L10 S89°3921"E 178.12 L11 NO2°26'49"W 389.15 Li 2_ N89°14'C4"W 55.02 L13 N89°14'04"W 15.00 L14 NORTH 43.93 L15 N67°49'25"E 75.50 L16 S00°4555"W 16.19 L17 S67°49 25 W 59.33 L18 SOUTH 33.82 NOTE: A FOUR (4) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BREEZE WAY AND CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AS WELL AS ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE SCHOOL TRACT AND THE CITY PARK (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTAANDDSHALLLGRUNTTHEIDES OF LLENGTH OFTHESTING DRAINAGE CHANNELSCHOOL PROPERTY (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). SURVEYOR / ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT VLK ARCHITECTS 1161 CORPORATE DRIVE WEST SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76006 (817) 633-1600 FAX (817) 633-9600 CONTACT: STEVE HAFER T UCIVU 1 GJ DU 1 LU 1Ilu Lit I ■ DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON -SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: ALTHOUGH AN OPEN CHANNEL IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFERES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNDER- GROUND IN A BOX CULVERT. PER EXHIBIT E OF THE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOX CULVERT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL HAVE A BOX CULVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE SHOULD BE FIVE (5) LANES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL FRONTAGE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL THREE (3) LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS FOR THE STREETBWIDENING IANDRSE RELATEDTHESDRAOINAGESTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. UNTIL THAT TIME, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ASPHALT LANE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY ITS, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN FEBRUARY 2000. eWIvER CARROLL ISD 1101 N. CARROLL AVENUE SDU'THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (317) 416-1420 PAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 4-14-00 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN LOT 19 BLOCK 1 CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 16,081 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12785, PAGE 249 SITUATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY ABSTRACT No,803, TARRANT COUNTY, TQ66S ONE LOT APRIL 17, 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-026 SHEET 1 OF LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S17°17145"W 139.14 L2 S00°04'05"E 164.02 L3 S01°09'53"W 146.30 L4 S45°56'07"W 21.30 L5 N00°04'05"W 164.02 L6 N17°17'45"E 139.14 L7 S02°26 49 E 389.15 L8 589°1404E 68.61 L9 N00°0405W 20.00 L10 S89°3921"E 178.12 L11 NO2°26'49"W 389.15 Li 2_ N89°14'C4"W 55.02 L13 N89°14'04"W 15.00 L14 NORTH 43.93 L15 N67°49'25"E 75.50 L16 S00°4555"W 16.19 L17 S67°49 25 W 59.33 L18 SOUTH 33.82 NOTE: A FOUR (4) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BREEZE WAY AND CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AS WELL AS ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE SCHOOL TRACT AND THE CITY PARK (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTAANDDSHALLLGRUNTTHEIDES OF LLENGTH OFTHESTING DRAINAGE CHANNELSCHOOL PROPERTY (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). SURVEYOR / ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT VLK ARCHITECTS 1161 CORPORATE DRIVE WEST SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76006 (817) 633-1600 FAX (817) 633-9600 CONTACT: STEVE HAFER T UCIVU 1 GJ DU 1 LU 1Ilu Lit I ■ DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON -SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: ALTHOUGH AN OPEN CHANNEL IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFERES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNDER- GROUND IN A BOX CULVERT. PER EXHIBIT E OF THE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOX CULVERT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL HAVE A BOX CULVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE SHOULD BE FIVE (5) LANES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL FRONTAGE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL THREE (3) LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS FOR THE STREETBWIDENING IANDRSE RELATEDTHESDRAOINAGESTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. UNTIL THAT TIME, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ASPHALT LANE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY ITS, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN FEBRUARY 2000. eWIvER CARROLL ISD 1101 N. CARROLL AVENUE SDU'THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (317) 416-1420 PAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 4-14-00 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN LOT 19 BLOCK 1 CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 16,081 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12785, PAGE 249 SITUATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY ABSTRACT No,803, TARRANT COUNTY, TQ66S ONE LOT APRIL 17, 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-026 SHEET 1 OF NOTE: A FOUR (4) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BREEZE WAY AND CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AS WELL AS ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE SCHOOL TRACT AND THE CITY PARK (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTAANDDSHALLLGRUNTTHEIDES OF LLENGTH OFTHESTING DRAINAGE CHANNELSCHOOL PROPERTY (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY). SURVEYOR / ENGINEER CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS ARCHITECT VLK ARCHITECTS 1161 CORPORATE DRIVE WEST SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76006 (817) 633-1600 FAX (817) 633-9600 CONTACT: STEVE HAFER T UCIVU 1 GJ DU 1 LU 1Ilu Lit I ■ DENOTES EXTERNAL AUDITORY LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING ON -SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: ALTHOUGH AN OPEN CHANNEL IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFERES THAT THE DRAINAGE BE UNDER- GROUND IN A BOX CULVERT. PER EXHIBIT E OF THE TIF AGREEMENT FOR REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE CITY WAS TO FUND THE COST OF THE BOX CULVERT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL HAVE A BOX CULVERT CONSTRUCTED ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT FOR THE COST OF THE CULVERT. GENERAL NOTE CONCERNING CARROLL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HAS INDICATED THAT CARROLL AVENUE SHOULD BE FIVE (5) LANES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL FRONTAGE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL THREE (3) LANES ONCE THE CITY HAS THE FUNDS FOR THE STREETBWIDENING IANDRSE RELATEDTHESDRAOINAGESTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. UNTIL THAT TIME, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ASPHALT LANE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY ITS, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IN FEBRUARY 2000. eWIvER CARROLL ISD 1101 N. CARROLL AVENUE SDU'THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (317) 416-1420 PAX (817) 251-6622 CONTACT: JOHN CRAFT REVISED 4-14-00 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN LOT 19 BLOCK 1 CARROLL ISD No. 5 ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 16,081 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12785, PAGE 249 SITUATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY ABSTRACT No,803, TARRANT COUNTY, TQ66S ONE LOT APRIL 17, 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-026 SHEET 1 OF w 00 r O oaM 0o m o� o O' O �Q7 o� o,co o- 00 N ❑ 0 0 0 mo a,o tN A N 10 u10 O � �0 00 uN uN 10 10 N f0 a a � N 7 a C m v 0 0 W O v a o o N m m N O 3 w 0 w o m m a U 0 N N 0 o N N N O v N _0 o N N 0 0 N 0 N O 0 �� N N N N O NOS N'o 04 C On -O Qj C C C D o L O C U O O C O� a C O U U A E U 00 O > N O N NN N N N o 0� o O o N N N N N N N N N^ _ O 0- O^ O O� N N^ N� N Q. N ? N'o N- N N d N ono, o o. o, c o� tr a 3 � w a 0 0 J / o W � O d Z O O 0 3Q m o O /o m o N O ] >. o0 t M Lio o ~�n0 J U o w-o u(r/ o O J s0 Q• (L / d H .O 3 3 1 PROPOSED B" EXIST. 8" DIA. 1 WATER LINE I J WATER LINE \ I \ I---------------------------- � � I 0 \ I / \ ` EXIST. R.O.W. LINE CONSTRUCT ADA RAID c(� " I \\\ CONSTRUCT 1 .8WMQLINL7. 6" THICK CONCRETE RIP —RAP WITH I 3 NO. 3 BARS @ 18" 0.C.E.W. WITH "A ..' 18 TOE WALL AT TOP AND TOE J " OF SLOPE —CONSTRUCT EXP. JT. " I "� y PROPOSED 8 / AT EXISTING HEADWALLS/WING— WATER LINE =r WALLS AND NEW PILOT CHANNEL711 I� Firm, FA 4 V) SANITARUSE.WER ,r 7��1 ®, - ' p�®� rti i 1 - 1.1 1 ad r.:k•° d4$ c ri 24 - - 1 • 1, 1 phi®�i - �®�'�•a��pV1V� 1- 1 1 1 1 1' r 4 •mv ' :a'�e.'�e P.�b.d� 1&8YA'e �� 1 �. I ��,�iiE. p•+gR.•vpj pv Xv ® R s I WIN P_41VmU I 1 1 ii" dC w \ �� �� —� y PILOT CHANNEL DETAILS Rippling A ®4 e..aa, ,.r. 1! Nil ON —SITE PAVING LEGEND I ----J REFER TO \ PAVING DETAILS ON SHEET C2.03 FOR TYPICAL ON —SITE SECTIONS \ 7" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CO RETE WITH NO. 3 BARS @ 16" O.C.ENC. (ALSO SEE SPECIAL NOTE THIS HEET) 6" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CO CRETE WITH NO. 3 BARS @ 18" O.C.E.W. 5" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CO CRETE WITH NO. 3 BARS @ 20" O.C.E OFF —SITE PAVING LEGEND REFER TO PAVING DETAILS ON SHEET C2. 04 AND C2. 05 FOR TYPICAL OFFsuk_jF-- SUT I ONS 7 CONCRETE PAVEMENT (Sv. CARROLL AVE.12)) JK S�5 ' F- Q: Lu a, . LL O U' CN Z W, Lij cf) CL z w LLJ z LLJ \ — z \ J o 1 \ 1 U 1 N 0 N O 0 H H U 1 a' N N LA U rn U m J w 1 O m O � W - ci 1 W (zp 3 Lai V Lu 1 o 0 0 o - EXIST. GRADE o G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G LLI > — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Z E— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — z Q owc w U) rr Q z Q U) 06 Iz w Q z G w C C O� Ol � C � N O O X 70 N r O C U^ p > O v`O . m v N N N -o 00 0 0 0 N NOJ N N N o Od o O O N N N N N N N� CAN N^ O o O^ O O� N NN� N NO Ol^ m,o 0)� m^ mN N'n N ' NM N,, N� O� O� O O O 1RTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" : I'-0" :S: ALL FACADES SHALL BE BRICK MASONRY AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO.557. THE HIGHEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING IS THE GYMNASIUM PARAPET AT 33'-4" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. DASHED LINES REPRESENT ABOVE ROOF MECHANICAL AREA FOR ROOF TOP UNITS. ROOF TOP LOCATIONS AND NUMBER ARE THEORETICAL BASED ON ROBERT H. ROCKENBAUGH ELEMENTARY. UTH ELEVATI ,I F. A k I I ki ARCHITECTS VLK Architects 1161 Corporate Drive West Suite 300 Arlington Texas 76006 817 633 1600 CIVIL Cheatham and Associates 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. Suite 200 Arlington Texas 76006 817 548 0696 STRUCTURAL Metro Structural Consultants 305 N.E. Loop 820 Suite 507 Hurst Texas 76053 817 284 8833 M.E.P. Wells Doak Engineers Inc. 2800 South Hulen Suite 212 Fort Worth Texas 76053 817 920 9545 EXPIRES 07-31-00 4-14-2000 LO Ucn Q Q � w z U) � 0 0 0 0 _ 0 U v Cf) C!) � z G w Q o � z z � w w :E o w z I J w w �Q0� w °C z C)U:) DIRECTOR PROJ. COORD. H.LV. R.E.R. DESIGNER DRAWN BY R.M.L. - K.K.N. SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATE APRIL 14, 2000 REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 9919.00 SCALE:1/16" : 1'-0" SHEET NO. J U/V Z000 COPYRIGHT C 2000 VLK ARCHITECTS M.E.P. Wells Doak 2800 South f Fort Worth 817 9; EAST ELEVATI SCALE: 1/16' = I'-0' EST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16' : I'-0' Tract 3A2 ZONED SF-lA LUD=LDR Tract 3A1B ZONED SF -IA LUD=LDR U-; ID Tract 3A1 = ZONED SF-1 A o LUD=LDR z o Ln C • Ir ZONED SF -IA LUD=LDR Tract 3A1 A o LOT 8 I n CD z C-, D D LOT 7 F_ z ZONED SF -IA LUD=LDR m N Co 00 _ O T 6 D CD -I LOT 5 2 v ci m ° U) C, a ;0 D i O �s o C, -- 264 SHADY OAKS DRIVE Tr act t 313 4 OUNTAIN FIVE ZERO TWO TR. -00 GREENVILE AVE STE 200 DALLAS. Tx 75206 V. 131159P.254 /ZONED AG LUD=LDR I I!i SOTHLAKE STATES VOLUME 388-75, AGE 8. PRTCT II ZONED SIF-1 A I olo l - - - -LOT 10 - III I'F - LOT 9 -LUD DR EAST-1316.90' 491 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE Tract 2C-abst 686 VOL•4852.Pg.393 MARCUS WAYLAND 2508 ROLLING LANE SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 2' I PF 379 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE Tract 213-abst 686 VOL.4543,Pg.782 W. RALPH EVANS 379 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 315 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE Tract 2A-abst 686 VOL.4040,P9.79 W. RALPH EVANS et ux LINDA EVANS 379 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 N W E N89°26'00"E 1316.90' CONCESSION Tract 2B ZONED AG RESTROOMS LUD= MDR PAVILION S89°26' W-1321.46 6, N89°26'E-1346.5' ZONED AG LUD=MDR x I Tract 2A S89°26'W-1351' N89°20'40"E 1353.60' x Tract 3C1-abstco 686 T 315 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE S Tract 3C1 and 3D1-abst 686 VOL.7176,Pg•785 GRAPHIC SCALE W. RALPH EVANS and wife LINDA S. EVANS 315 N. SHADY OAKS DRIVE 0 50 100 200 SOUTHLAKE.TX 76092 ZONED AG LUD= MDR ( IN FEET ) I IICD CD Ea GREEN OAKS LANE \ I� LOT �-- 20 ----�a�7---- -�o� - �-- - - I � I OAK HILL ESTATES LOT 19 I II LOT 17 k_ICABINET A, SLIDE 683, PRTCT III I I m ZONED SF-20A III LOT 18 �.LI LOT 16 LUDr6p LOT 14 LOT 13 I LOT 12 I LOT 11 LOT 10 II \ I CD JQI III J� I I EXISTIN 6' WOOD FENL I zN Q l 0_�F I L �3/4"1 ,------------ ---- -- -- - -- - .a 4 --1II`77E X I -- -- -1 ---------------------------_p{IMFL-------- - 8- - H I fJ -LA -N ----------------------- 25' BUI I"l LP LP 14 OMMUN I T TH LINE LP RAIN PIPE LP LP METAL I ED j ENTER LO L, BUILD II VEAJVING LP MA NES BASEBALL FIELD LI II E E EE R I C -&41"IN EL AT WATER 25' BUILDING LINE p S ORAGE NK STORAGE AR Aj 8' STONE 1 P SCREENING FENC I GRAVEL DRIVE BASEBALL FIELD LP N6.2 I I LP No. 6 i t L >a LP i HE ASPHALT PARKING AREA LP Rl 0 LP I I LP 1 BASEBALL FIELD O LP 1 1 7/ I No.8 1 I I LP � I ATTING AGE 0.1 I LP x I I I I L I I 1 1 1 BASEBALL FIELD I I I No.9 I I 1 I I 1 x I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I VENDIN LP MACHINES P CONCRETE SIDEWALK LP 6 1 1 �� I No.1 LP 0 Lp LP LP IJ BASEBALL FIELD No. 7 LPG BASEBALL FIELD No.3 LP i r7 / LP �� LP 0 I, LP ;� 0 I I L` BASEBALL FIELD NO.1 PAVIL ION 11 BASEBALL -Alo• 4 LP LP PROPOSED NEW L/Gl-+TING CONCRETE DR,I E 1 inch = 100 ft. I I I I ;, B SEBALL FlE I I x 1 1 LP No, I I I FUTURE PARK,NG 25 BUILDING LINE44 , ::. --��i�6--------- ---------- -- -; BASEBALL I o I I FUTURE' PARNNG B EBAL - 201 N. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD p ADVENTURE ALLEY P AYGRO ND 1 -- c,� Part of Tract 1C2-abst 686 LP oo VOL . 1 3749, Pg. 82 ZONED CS 1 AVE - .- .... :::: ....... ...............' :::::' ay EPIPD-CROSSROADS SQUARE LUD=PPOS x-.......• +N R .., o117 .... .., ... ... •i i 91 _... . ;....... I I j LP "'-"" © ASPHALT WALK -- N89 54' 33 W SOUTHLAKE,TXROLL760 2 - - - - ;...... ..... .... , .... .... - - .... ::::::.... ...... I ,�LJti�TR1CAL .. ........ i .............. .......' 1 ............... :::::..:::::::........•._.... , .... .... :::: ::::: TENNIS COURT I I oLE ;...... .... Y No. l No. 4 0 00�- .... .... No. t .... No.2 No 3 ::: ; IO S�/ DR ESM .... .... •.... / F - 1 ;....... :: ............ ....., .... ..... F u`wRE..... P QhK.L»�. .... .... ........ 1 N 1 .... .......:..:.... ,....../ 1 Lp 3 x I 1 DRAINAGE CHANNEL I I .... :::: .. .... .... :::: I w I' w .... .... ..... / l Z C ET A G :::: :::: _. LP I Im/9° 28 01 E �5.27LLJ ` O 1 F UZURF; ...... P ARx 1 NG O 1 :.............� hE I PaRKIr MM 1 ,-_ __ s No.13 LP L 1 c �� �V ZONED AG LUD=LDR x I I I, SHADY OAKS DRIVE I I 1 p VENDING P I 250 s S 8 9° 0 3 5 6 E 14. 41 I I 1 '� MACHINES i o 41 Tract 3B3 FOUNTAIN FIVE ZERO TWO TR ----------------- ------- 1 No.3 I _ T " 4600 GREENVILE AVE STE 20 0 25' BUILDING LINE I II a LP � No. 6 No. 7 U_) DALLAS, Tx 75206 N LOTS 293.4 L . B. G. HALL ADD I TON V. 13115.P.254 _ 1111 '�` L� �. v l 1 1 1 LP 2 ALP i T;; Cab. A, S I i de 1 21 6, PRTCT v \\ 1 1\ LP No 12 N0.11 No.10 No.9 No.8 LP Tract 3B4 M, I a ; LP LP I REMAINDER LOT 2 ZONED AG � �� �� LP '�` �` I I ZONED SP-2 LUD=LDR IT ..I. II \ � � 5 6 ` 1 Z = 19 ° 2 4 ' 14 " slca r AREA LL LP i LUD =R C 3 ►� 1�� 0' � R = 380.00', CO T o.1 �` LP LP LEI i I / DI OL �\ L _128.69 �Icc / M • LCB S09° 53' 02 "E LCB = 1\ �3 0 W L C 12 8.0 8 LP0-0 �5' 807tDTA1; L CISJ CD ° (` 5 UEL �25' BUILDING LINE �� �� \ ALL I I N89° 51 ' 43 'W� 390. 55' J0`�� / o = 01°22'24" -------------- O ti'�2 __ 1(b----------------------------------- ) - 1.Q L!� -. - � � O � I � v _ 606 W• SOUTHLAKE BLVD ----- _ _ R 2954 79' N87° - - - - - - _ _ r-- - - - - -- - ~i�� \ �- �18� 4T��_'IgL _--?�L.S-�_ ; _-AcGss�4 / LOT 1 = 24 52 W N O w , T 35 41' Tract 3B III 780. q2' `f��, �� ��\�\ L � �,SOUTHLAKE FOUR INVESTMENT LUD=RC D TENT/ON P D / L 70 82' I � I LCB=S87°42'20"W ZONED C2 100. i cv I I- 1_u= STREET 1 S89 LOT 3 . � Lc=70. 82' 7)921 86th LOT 1 I '� 410 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD I F I RST A��I �N SAVINGS BAN ADDITION LUBBOCK. TX 75050 III I LOT 2 - `�- __ - - -- - - 1 2 I �r ° „ Tract 3D5-abst 686 L--- - I - 03 46 40 I o C INET A. I _ - SLIDE 1325. P T 0 F m a MISSION HILL ESTATES VOLUME 388-158, PAGE 83, PRTCT ZONED SF-lA LUD=LDR LOT 1 1 , BLOCK 3 -------------- SAN SABA DRIVE LOT 1, BLOCK 4 - LOT 1R I LOT 2R LOT 3R I BLOCK 1 i THE F I R S T INSTALLMENT i DIAMOND C RCLE EST ATESi VOLUME 38 -1 81 , PAGE 71 , PRTC ZONED SF-lA LUD=LDR ZONED SF-lA LOT 1R, BLOCK 6 LOT 1R, BLOCK 5 LOT 2. BLOCK 6 LOT 3. BLOCK 6 LOT 4. BLOCK 6 / LOT 7. BLOCK 6 ZONED SF-1 A / ZONED SF -IA LUD=LDR / LUD=LDR TIC SECOND L9STALLMENT D I AM�I D C I R'CLE ESTATES VOLUME 36-181, PAGE 69, RTC LUD=LDR Z�NED SF-1 \ LOT 8. BLOCK 6 LOT 5. BLOCK 6I ZONED C2 LUD=OC V. 13115,P.254 ZONED C2I� I - LUD-RC ZONED c2 �_ 1 �- R = 5659.58 I BLOCK , I -'- 42.,,' 46.11' ZONED AG = - 5' u p 1 I VOL . 12651 , Pg. 152 0 , I LUD=LDR 21I I LUD=RC II I I I ARCH PARDUE WO GLAND H IL I SU o L = 373. 16 , 1 I LOT 1 / ' 16200 DALLAS PARKWAY I LCB = S84 34 12 W a PUBLIC�U MT WM. W. HALL SURVEY ,I o I I `J' SUITE 100 CABIN A, SLIDE 8, PRT I o V.1091 P. ��2�3s_- a N ABSTRACT NO. 687 SOUTHLAKE OAKS 0 LC = 373.09 I o A, S I de3231 0 0 o DALLAS. TX 75248 BLOCK 1 I I _ 1 `i c- a J II I I 1 O LOT 1 50 B G L 1 2 -�� �1 N TXDOT CL CURVE I O t _ _ I II I o � ZONED CS __ - X.- 0 9 _ - - - =0 - - - - - - --1-0L44& 11 I 1 L� LUD=PSP I _--- ----- 28„E �M� ) R _ 16° 35' 00„ 15 UE - _- _- -81 I 1 6� I______-- pp ° 10 - 2864' 79 J.M. STEVENSON SURVEY °' 97T9 `- 1 5' U E - Yui IL L I -- I cS' co J �Q a CD N 81 VAR R D ( F L= 8 2 9. 1 7' N -REL EA pp uLvEf� q99' S9 E V H' ABSTRACT N0. 2041 S U� WWBR-1_ I TTLEBERRY G. HAL pp �N8 01 _ --� N AKE BO L SURVE r>, o. 6 8 3 3' -- ----- CD N W C O R H I R A M C R A N B E R R Y - x. N� E T------------------------------ O U -' o Tract 1 A SURVEY - A B S T R A _-_-_____--- Abst 686 C T N o. 5 81--------------------- ---- - ------------ ---------- ______------- -- _ ZONED 01 r S88°12'29"E 760.95' N --- LUD=OC ------------ ------=�d-----------------------------------------------------a---re•3�~-c>��----------------------- - c 8 C Omm0�v� Tract IA-abst 686 HIRAM GRANBERRY SURVEY GRE ri EEN ZONED C2 AP R VED PRELIMINARY PL R TLINGER ADDITION Tract 3C-abst 581 ABSTRACT NO. 581 o No No.2 LUD=oC REUTLINGER ADDITION ZONED 01 VOL•9779.Pg.2371 SURVEYOR -ENGINEER OWNER Tract 2C �, 9� BLOCK 1 - LOT 2 CAB NET A. SLIDE xxx LUD=OC 507 W.SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4 5 W. SOUTH AKE BLVD w ZONED C2 Tract 3C GLOR I A J . LECHLER CHEATHAM ASSOCIATES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE s ��� COMMON Tract 2-abst 581 I Tract 3AIabst 581 o I LUD=OC JOHN STEPHEN CHURCH 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 667 N. CARROLL AVENUE ZONED SP-2 li y GREEN VOL.7695 P 1366 V9.676 ,Pg.807 BLOCK 1 -LOT 1 NILEY MONROE CHURCH ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 o� o No. 1 g I lN3iRD A.�REUTL 1NGNRER N I c/o GLOR I A J. LECHLER LUD=MDR �6 s�J LUD=MDR CONNER LAM AND W > SA REUTLI G (817) 548-0696 (81 7) 48.1-5581 ext 756 w CLARDY-RUFFNER q1 16 HC MEACHAM BLVD FAX (817) 265-8532 FAX (817) 421-2175 �� NED SF-20 POBOX 488 � JA41SON BLVD CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS CONTACT. BEN HENRY a1 5 W �OIiTHIAKF BiV� FT Wl-1RT1a ?� 7F,1'� ADVENT HRISTIAN CHURCH LOT 6. BLOCK 6 VOL.619.Pg.180 ZONED C2 VOL.1379,Pg.597 LUD=OC ZONED 01 LUD=OC SITE PLAN BICENTENIAL PARK BEING 61.61 ACRES SITUATED IN THE LBG HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 348 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 7Ch1FD Ol rVF ,s r , �'�, II, /INI tX ,II:AIr`IERNON• ll h28G4 CASE No. ZA 00-064 REVISED 5/22/00-PER CITY COMMENTS-GJ LUD=MDR C binet A, SI ide 1` 11 r, , fx �uJ� li ,>�..,.�...�.<R,....�.. ....,...��....,.�. SHEET 1 OF 2 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being several tracts of land situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract 686, and also being a portion of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition, to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point for the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1325, PRTCT, said point also being in a curve to the right in the north right-of-way line of West Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709),said curve to the right having a radius of 5659.58 feet and a central angle of 03 deg 46 min 40 sec, with a long chord bearing S84 34'12"W, a distance of 373.09 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said right-of-way curve an arc length of 373.16 feet to a point for the southeast corner of Woodland Hills RSU Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 608, PRTCT; THENCE N 00 00'39"W9 along the east line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87 24'49"W, along the north line of said Woodland Hill Addition a distance of 143.99 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 00 00'39"W, along the east line of a tract of land by deed to Arch Purdue as recorded in Volume 12651, Page 152, DRTCT, a distance of 68.76 feet, to a point for its northeast corner; THENCE N 87 24'49"W, along the north line of said Purdue tract, a distance of 271.58 feet, to a point for its northwest corner, said point being at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 380.00 feet and a central angle of 19 deg 24 min 14 sec, with a long chord bearing S09 53'02"E, a distance of 128.08 feet; THENCE southerly, along said curve to the right, an arc length of 128.69 feet to a point for corner in the west line of said Purdue tract; THENCE S 01 10'55" E, a distance of 106.66 feet, to a point for corner in the north right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709); THENCE S 87 37'01" W, along said north right-of-way line of F.M. 1709 a distance of 112.33 feet, to a point for the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1,Southlake Oaks Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3231, PRTCT; THENCE N 00 10'55" W, a distance of 101.76 feet, to a point for the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 270.00 feet and a central angle of 22 deg 56 min 13 sec, with a long chord bearing N11 39'00"W, a distance of 107.37 feet; THENCE northerly, along said curve to the left, an arc length of 108.09 feet to a point for the northeast corner said Lot 2; THENCE N 87 24'52"W, along the north line of said Lot 2 and Lot 1, and continuing a distance of 780.42 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE N 04 10'37" W, a distance of 274.34 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11618 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89 03'56" E, a distance of 714.41 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 2287. DRTCT; THENCE N 00 10'56" W, a distance of 1165.42 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE S 89 01'08" E, a distance of 579.33 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 11438 , Page 1326, DRTCT; THENCE North, a distance of 22.73 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of Lot 20, Oak Hill Estates Adition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 683, PRTCT; THENCE S 89 10'10" E, a distance of 1303.14 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 4928 Page 733, DRTCT, said point being in the west right-of-way line of North White Chapel Boulevard; THENCE S 01 22'40" W, along said west right-of-way line a distance of 805.58 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to EPIPD- Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT, THENCE N 89 48'11" W, a distance of 518.15 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to EPIPD- Crossroads Square as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 82, DRTCT; THENCE S 01 10'23" W, a distance of 99.63 feet, to a point for the southwest corner of said EPIPD- Crossroads Square tract; THENCE N 89 5433" W, a distance of 22.79 feet, to a point for the northeast corner of a tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13749 , Page 81. DRTCT; THENCE S 00 04'36" E. a distance of 164.14 feet, to a point for corner in the north line of a of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23, DRTCT; THENCE N 89 28'01" E, a distance of 25.27 feet, to a point for the northwest corner of said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23. DRTCT, said point being in the west line of Lot 2, L.B.G. Hall Addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, PRTCT; THENCE S 01 11'27" E. a distance of 314.83 feet. to a point for the southeast corner of a said tract of land by deed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 13731, Page 23. DRTCT, said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, First American Savings Banc Addition to the City of Southlake. as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1325. PRTCT; THENCE N 89 51'43" W. along said First American Savings Banc Addition, a distance of 390.55 feet to a point for its northwest corner; THENCE S 00 41'30" W, a distance of 250.24 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. and containing 61.61 acres of land, more or less. o Q o n m % � U N C 0 ; rJ ai � G O r O O u EXISTING — SUMMARY CHART — REQUIRED OR PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA (SQ. FT.) Z OF AREA IN FRONT OR SIDE CANOPY TREES REQUIRED 2,100 75% 4 PROVIDED • • • Credits' • — Request existing plantings to be credited for compl No additonal plantings to be required. SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERY, LOCATION LENGTH BUFFERYARD WIDTH — TYPE CANOPY TREES ACCI THE NORTH REQUIRED 580' 10'—B 12 1' PROVIDED 580, • • NORTH REQUIRED 1303' 10'—B 28 31 PROVIDED 1303' • • 4 WEST ac REQUIRED 1840, 10'—B 37 5i NORTH PROVIDED 1840' • • 4 SHADY OAKS REQUIRED 274' NONE NONE NOI PROVIDED 274' Is • N. WHITE CHAPEL REQUIRED 770' 10'—E a 1� PROVIDED 770' • Is EAST & SOUTH REQUIRED 1695' 5'—A 17 34 PROVIDED 1895' • • , FM170e REQUIRED 373' 20'-0 15 1: PROVIDED 373' • • 4 SOUTH & WEST REQUIRED 1051, S'—A 11 Z PROVIDED 1051' • • + Credits. • — Request existing plantings to be credited for compl and bufferyard requirements. No additonnl planting PROPOSED SP-1 REGULATIONS Title of Project: Bicentennial Park EXISTING SITE DATA SUMMARY ZONING EXISTING PROPOSED CS AG C2 SP-1 LAND USE DESIGNATION PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC CONSTRUCTION: START FINISH NONE PLANNED NET ACREAGE OF PROJECT 61.61 ACRES BUILDING FOOTPRINT % SITE COVERAGE ONE STORY BUILDING MAMMUM HEIGHT = 20'-0' FLOOR AREA BY USAGE: MAINTENANCE 800 SQ. FT. MEETING ARRAS 4200 SQ. . OFFICES 620 SQ. FT. AREA OF OPEN SPACE % SITE COVERAGE 41 ACRES 87.0% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS % SITE COVERAGE 20 ACRES 33.0% AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE % COVERAGE 0.5 ACRES 0.BO% PARKING: REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL 320 SPACES 647 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD 536 SPACES VAN ACCESSABLE 4 SPACES HANDICAPED 7 SPACES LOADING SPACES: REQUIRED PROVIDED I NONE NONE NUMBER OF LOTS 1 PARKING SPACE CALCULATION DATA 3 BUILDINGS — TOTAL FLOOR SPACE = 7,000 SQ.FT. FIFTEEN MOVABLE BLEACHERS AT 30 PERSON CAPACITY = 450 SEATS 2 EACH FIXED SEATING BLEACHERS AT 160 PERSONS EACH= 300 SEATS Case No. ZA 00-064 Proposed Regulations Comments I Permitted Uses Same as CS 2 Accessory Uses Same as CS, and adding lighted tennis courts, lighted baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales, practice fields, outdoor vending, outside storage. 3 Specific Use Permits Same as CS 4 Development Regulations Same as CS, except no interior landscaping or bufferyards & planting are required. 4.1 Height Same as CS 4.2 Front Yard 25 foot width, except 50 ft. along west Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). 4.3 Side Yard 25 foot width 4.4 Rear Yard 25 foot width 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS 4.7 Additional Development Regulations No residential adjacency standards apply. No screening External lighting will be directed away from for building uses lying within 400 feet device required adjacent to residential zoning. No residential property. of single family residential zoning. corridor overlay standards apply. Building and additions attached thereto may emulate existing construction materials. surfaces. and architectural style. r.�..vw�,wuuuawc•�+nor1 ncgumu..ua.npu SU V YOR—ENGIN CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (817) 548-0696 FAX (817) 265-8532 CONTACT: GORDON JOHNS 70 SPACES 150 SPACES 100 SPACES OWNER CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 481-5581 ext 756 FAX (817 )421-2175 CONTACT: BEN HENRY VICINITY MAP SITE DATA: 450 WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD 61.61 ACRES — GROSS ROW DED 0.74 ACRES ROW DED 0.22 ACRES 60.65 NET ACRES SITE PLAN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 BICENTENIAL PARK ADDITION TO THE THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 61.61 ACRES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 4928, PAGE 733, VOLUME 6931, PAGE 94 VOLUME 4867, PAGE 106, VOLUME 10346, PAGE 278 VOLUME 13731, PAGE 23, VOLUME 11438► PAGE 2287 VOLUME 11618. PAGE 1326, VOLUME 11804, PAGE 61 CAUSE No. 97-71551-2, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.2 CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AND ALSO BEING A PART OF LOT 2. LBG HALL ADDITION AS RECORDED IN CABINET 'A', SLIDE 1216 PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS SITUATED IN THE L.B.G. HALL SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 348, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ONE LOT p� NOVEMBER 29, 199gM MAY 2 6 2000 CASE No. ZA 00-064 SHEET 2 OF 2 11--