Loading...
1992-07-21 CC PACKETCity of Southlake, Texas Im M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting, July 21, 1992 1. Agenda Item No 4 City Manager's Report. The departmental reports are in your packet. Let me or the Directors know if you have any questions. Note the sales tax increased 13.75% during this reporting period. However, note from the memo attached hereto that $5, 521.74 is a one-time payment for prior unreported local sales tax. This was the result of in-house audit by Lou Ann Heath, Finance Director. Note also that building permits for June 1992 were up considerably over the same period last year (31 vs 8); as of today we have 35 single family permits for July, which will be reported next month. 2. Agenda Item No 5A Tennis Program at Bicentennial Park. This program is the latest proposal by the Park and Recreation Board to expand the recreational opportunities in the park. The three previous programs this summer attracted 90 participants: Adventure Camp I (36); Adventure Camp II (21); Baseball Camp (33). 3. Agenda Item No 5B Res 92-32 Appointment of City Council Liaison Officer between City and CISD. Following the May elections, the City Council discussed having Stephen Apple serve as the Council Liaison to CISD. We have since realized that City Council did not take formal action on this matter. Resolution 92-32 will provide documentation of the Council's action. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 16, 1992 Page 2 4. Agenda Item No 5C Resolution 92-33 Canine position with SDPS. The use of the canine unit on a limited basis was discussed during the budget preparation. Funds are included in the budget for use of the dog. As pointed out in Director Campbell's memo, the animal has been utilized on several special occasions. The resolution before you for consideration will provide protection to the municipality should an incident occur involving use of the animal. 5. Agenda Item No 5D Award of Bids for Reconstruction of Post Oak Trail, Cypress Creek and the drainage on Pevtonville Road adjacent to the new CISD high school. Note in the memo from Mike Barnes, Director of Public Works, that staff estimated the three projects to cost $155,000. The low bid was $151,723. The cost estimates originally presented to City Council included an estimated $20,000 for the reconstruction of Peytonville adjacent to the new high school. This project had been held up by the weather, but it is underway again. We will not know the final cost for this project until it is completed, but it appears at this time that it will be within estimate. 6. Agenda Item No 5E 1993 Transportation Improvement Program. The memo from Greg Last, City Planner, outlines the purpose of the TIP program. FYI, attached hereto is a copy of the Mobility 2010 Regional Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. My July 2, 1992 memorandum to you briefly pointed out the change in the way transportation funds will be allocated as a result of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Some projects will be funded directly by TxDOT, some only after recommendation for funding by the Regional Transportation Council of NCTCOG. We mentioned that White Chapel and Continental are eligible for funding under separate Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 16, 1992 Page 3 programs. White Chapel, since it will be a principal arterial between two state highways (with connection to an urbanized FM highway), will probably rate high. Tuesday night Mike Barnes, Eddie Cheatham, and Greg Last met with the Chairpersons of the various committees from the Road Improvement Task force to discuss the priorities for projects to be included in the first $1.5 million bond program. (This will be presented to City Council August 4th.) Their recommendation will be to hold White Chapel until the second bond issuance for several reasons, including concern with both major north/south roads (Carroll and White Chapel) being under construction at the same time as FM1709. This will also give us an opportunity to see if White Chapel can be funded with state participation. „. The City of Colleyville did not include Pleasant Run (White Chapel) in its TIP submittal. We have been told that they do not want the road improved, thus to hold down traffic volume. This is a factor for consideration. Approval of the TIP submitted by City Council is just the first step in the process. 7. Agenda Item No. 6A. Public Forum. In my July 2 memorandum to you I mentioned that Maurine Doggett might appear to request amendment to the zoning ordinance as a result of the ZBA approval of a Special Exception Use Permit for the Moffats. She stopped by our office Tuesday to let us know she would probably be at the July 21st meeting. She has lodged a complaint that the Moffats are not complying with the restrictions imposed by the ZBA. The latest complaint was received by Police Services at approximately 7:40 p.m. this evening. Police Sergeant Rhonda Moore will be preparing an incident report. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 16, 1992 Page 4 FYI, attached hereto is a copy of a letter to Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary, from Nancy Moffat concerning the permit. Also attached is a letter to Nancy Moffat from Karen Gandy. Concerning the complaint from Mrs. Balcar, the resident of Jellico Circle mentioned in my July 2 memorandum, the testing lab has collected the soil samples. We should have results back before the July 21st meeting. 8. Agenda Item No 7A Second Reading Ordinance No. 480-73 (ZA 92-25.) Gymnastics Plus zone change request. There have been no changes since the first reading. 9. Agenda Item No. 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D were tabled at the July 7 meeting to the July 21 meeting. Note the staff comments in the packet memoranda. The same issues concerning the Timarron second access (Item 8C) are still outstanding. 10. Agenda Item No 8E Ordinance No 480-74 (ZA 92-30). 1st Reading. Zone change request by James Phipps at 710 S. Kimball Avenue. Note that as a result of P&Z recommendation to deny proposed change in zoning, 6 affirmative votes are required for approval by City Council. 11. Agenda Item No 9A Resolution NO. 92-31 (ZA 92-29), Specific Use Permit for antenna. Note the attached memo from Analeslie Muncy, City Attorney, concerning the height of amateur radio towers. 12. Agenda Item No 10A TRA proposal for refund of Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Surplus Funds. This item was discussed during the June 2, 1992 Council meeting. The proposal before you is the only one to which all parties can agree. This proposal if approved by City Council will have a positive benefit to our 1992-93 proposed budget. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 16, 1992 Page 5 13. Agenda Item No. 11A, will take approximately 40-45 minutes total. In keeping with precedent, the presentations will be informative and if implemented will be of value. 14. Agenda Item No 11B. Tree Preservation Ordinance. Greg Last will have a synopsis of the major provisions of the proposed ordinance by Tuesday night. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 15. Noise complaints/overflights from D/FW. Recently we have received several complaints concerning low -flying aircraft • over Cross Timber Hills on landing approach to D/FW. (Copy attached). Today I spoke with Michael DiGirolamo, Deputy Executive Director of Operations at D/FW. He told me he has his staff investigating the complaints, and will be responding in writing to all complainants with a copy to the City. Mr. DiGirolamo said they too are concerned and sensitive to such complaints. D/FW has hired a Noise Abatement Officer, who will begin work August 1. They are in the process of establishing a noise monitoring system which will include Southlake. He did say the aircraft are supposed to be on ILS, and should be on centerline with the runway glide slope. 16. Update on Dove Estates Sewer Charge. Last meeting we discussed the lots in Dove Estates which must pay $4,000 to the original developer in order to connect to the sewer. Eighteen properties have paid either the $4,000 fee or the limited time $2,000 discounted fee. It appears that a total of seventeen (17) properties have not paid the $4,000 fee. We are attempting to firm up the number, however, if the number Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 16, 1992 Page 6 is correct a total of $68,000 is due the developer if the lots are connected to the sewer. 17. Gasoline Leak at Justin Grocery. Please note the attached memo from Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety. We are treating this incident as a major situation. The City of Keller was not overly concerned until I notified Alan Bogard this afternoon. His staff had not brought it to his attention. Our Public Safety and Public Works staff have performed well in this situation. 18. FYI Note the following attachments: • Memo from Billy Campbell concerning recent structure fires. ,, • Letter from Phillip Bressinck concerning offer of land. • Letter from Carlo Farina to Phil Glegg, concerning the proposed development in West Beach • Handout from Betty Springer concerning a gazebo concert which the Lake Cities Community Band is proposing to hold at Bicentennial Park August 31, 1992. More information will be forthcoming. The Parks Board approved this project at its July 13, 1992 meeting. 19. Note the following dates for your calendars: • July 28, Budget work session • August 11, 12, 13 budget work sessions • August 27, Joint meeting of Mayors and Councilmembers from the 8-member cities of Metroport. (!�)xe�7— CEH/kb CY4-wT coyie� `moo A& TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS -7�10Z STATE OF TEXAS AUSTIN. 78774 JOHN SHARP Comptroller July 8, 1992 Ms. Lou Ann Heath Finance Director City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Ms. Heath: I'm writing to follow up on my letter of April 20th to let you know that Enforcement Officers from our Fort Worth Office have completed their investigation of the two accounts. This resulted with a collection of an additional $5,521.74 unreported local sales tax, which is included in your July 1992 sales tax rebate payment. This should be considered as a one time payment since this represents collections for prior reporting periods. Please call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441, extension 34539, if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance. Sincere , Foehner Ta Allocation Section Rev ue Accounting Divisionl R an equal Opportunity emOic, R North Central Texas Council of Governments April 1991 What is Mobility 2010? Mobility 2010: The Regional Transportation Plan for North Central Texas is a 20-year plan for guiding the implementation of roadway and transit improvements in the Dallas -Fort Worth metropolitan area. The Plan is based on regional transportation needs identified through the process of forecasting future travel demand, evaluating system alternatives, and selecting those options which best meet the mobility needs of the region. Mobility 2010, prepared by NCTCOG, is the product of a coordinated effort among local governments, transit authorities, and the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT). Transportation improvements identified in the Plan include the following: • New Freeways and Improvements to Existing Freeways • Rail Transit and General Transit Service Improvements • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes • Strategic Regional Arterials and Local Arterial Improvements The Regional Transportation Plan was adopted by the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) and the North Central Texas Council of Governments' (NCTCOG) Executive Board in August 1990 to guide the expenditure of federal, State, and local funds for regional transportation improvements. This Plan is required under federal law for transportation projects receiving federal financial assistance. What are the Goals of the Mobility 2010 Plan? The Mobility 2010 Plan is a guideline for improving transportation in the Dallas -Fort Worth metropolitan area. The following represent goals by which this Plan was established: • Develop a comprehensive transportation plan which meets the anticipated mobility needs of the region over the next 20 years • Promote participation of local governments, transit authorities, and SDHPT in the regional transportation planning process • Identify a cost-effective roadway and transit system which provides levels of service and mobility equal to those experienced in the region in 1980 based on annual delay per capita • Provide a regional transportation plan which maintains and promotes the economic and environmental quality of the region • Document funding requirements to develop the needed trans- portation system • Maintain a regional transportation plan which guides the expenditure of local, State, and federal funds toward implementation of projects included in the Plan Im What are the Recommendations of the Plan? The Plan lists four major categories of improvements needed to maintain mobility in the year 2010. The recommended improvements are expected to decrease the percentage of roadways congested by 24 percent from 1986 levels. In addition to these physical improvements, the Plan recommends developing a Congestion Management System as an addi- tional effort for relieving future traffic congestion. Freeway Improvements The Plan calls for a total of 5,200 lane miles of freeways to be operating in the region by the year 2010. (In 1986 there were 2,950 freeway lane miles.) Mobility 2010 identifies a series of improvements to existing freeways. These widening recommendations are based on year 2010 traffic projections, available right-of-way, and maintaining reasonable peak -hour traffic flow on the facility. New Freeways in the Plan are recommended based on traffic volume forecasts warranting freeway construction and operation by the year 2010. Future Freeway designations represent proposed freeway facilities where traffic volume projections warrant only frontage roads by the year 2010. Right-of-way in the Future Freeway corridors should be preserved for eventual construction of the freeways. New and Future Freeway locations illustrated in the Plan are shown to demonstrate travel corridor needs. The final location must be determined through location and design studies. The following New Freeways are included in the Plan: • Trinity Freeway connecting both U.S. 175 and I.H. 30 in Dallas to S.H. 360 in Arlington • S.H. 161 from S.H. 190 in Carrollton to I.H. 20 in Grand Prairie • S.H. 190 from I.H. 35E in Carrollton to I.H. 30 in Garland • Dallas North Tollway extension from Briar Grove Road in Dallas to S.H. 121 in Collin County • S.H. 121 from I.H. 35W north of the Fort Worth CBD to F.M. 1187 in Tarrant County • S.H. 360 north extension from S.H. 183 in Euless to S.H. 121 in Grapevine • S.H. 114 extension from Grapevine to I.H. 35W in Denton County • South Dallas County Freeway from U.S. 287 to U.S. 67 • S.H. 121 in Grapevine north of D/FW Airport to U.S. 75 in McKinney • S.H. 199 from downtown Fort Worth northwest to the Trans- portation Study Area boundary • U.S. 67 from the Dallas County line southwest to the Transportation Study Area boundary The following Future Freeways are identified in the Plan: • Trinity Freeway from S.H. 360 in Arlington to I.H. 820 on the east side of Fort Worth • S.H. 360 south extension from I.H. 20 in Arlington to U.S. 287 in Ellis County • S.H. 170 from S.H. 114 in Roanoke to I.H. 35W in Fort Worth • North Tarrant County Freeway from I.H. 35W to U.S. 377 connecting to the proposed North Tarrant County Parkway, a Strategic Regional Arterial • South Tarrant County Freeway from I.H. 35W to U.S. 287 • South Dallas County Freeway from U.S. 67 to I.H. 35E The final freeway designation is Local Govemment Preservation of Right -of - Way. These roadways are proposed freeway facilities where traffic volume projections do not warrant construction of a new freeway or frontage roads by the year 2010. In order to allow for future construction, local governments need to designate these freeway facilities on thoroughfare plans and preserve right-of-way. The location shown for the Trinity Freeway in the Mobility 2010 Plan map is symbolic as are all New and Future Freeways indicated in Mobility 2010. The final location of this or any roadway will depend on resolution of environmental, developmental, and flooding concerns such as those described by the City of Fort Worth in their Trinity Corridor Position Paper and those described in federal and/or State environmental impact guidelines. Rail Transit and General Transit Service Improvements The Plan calls for 103 miles of passenger rail service including the 66 miles of light rail contained in the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) System and 37 miles of commuter rail. Based on patronage forecasts, the Plan delineates Phase I corridors to be constructed and operational prior to Phase II corridors. In every light rail corridor, express bus service should be provided until light rail service is operational. The Mobility 2010 rail recommendations include the following: Phase I Light Rail on 40 miles within the DART system Phase II Light Rail on 26 miles within the DART system • Commuter Rail on the RAILTRAN line between Dallas and Fort Worth Central Business Districts including service to the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport In addition to these rail facilities, all existing railroad rights -of -way should be monitored for potential future transportation corridors. The RTC recognizes that DART is working toward the goal of implementing a regional transit system, applauds their efforts, and encourages them to move forward as expeditiously as possible. Included in the Mobility 2010 Plan are the local and express services proposed by DART and the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (FWTA). The DART Transit System Plan calls for expanding the bus system to support the light rail, commuter rail, and high occupancy vehicle lanes. In addition, bus service will be expanded into areas not served by the fixed guideway facilities. Express bus service will be expanded in conjunction with construction of HOV facilities from 730 route miles in 1986 to 860 route miles in 2010. Local bus route service is planned to expand from 2,500 route miles in 1986 to 3,200 route miles in 2010. In addition to bus service, the DART Transit System Plan includes: demand -response services for mobility -impaired citizens, activity center circulators to improve mobility within activity centers, and local assistance program funding to assist local governments with arterial street projects to improve bus operations. In Fort Worth, local bus and park -and - go bus services will be continued as provided today. These facilities are aimed at improving mobility and providing service to transit dependents. In addition, express bus service is planned to be expanded from 120 route miles in 1986 to 400 route miles by 2010. In conjunction with expansion of express bus service will be the construction of several park - and -ride facilities serving high -density activity - centers. FWTA plans to continue with its Mobility -Impaired Transportation Service, RideShare Program, and subscription bus service to several major employers in Fort Worth. High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes The Plan also calls for a 134-mile Regional High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane System for preferential use by carpoois, vanpools, and buses. While the exact location and operation of these facilities must be determined through future feasibility and design studies, HOV is recommended in the following freeway corridors: • I.H. 30 (East R.LT) from I.H. 635 to the Dallas CBD • Trinity Freeway from I.H. 30 (East R.L.T.) south of the Dallas CBD to S.H. 183 • U.S. 67 from I.H. 20 to the I.H. 35E / U.S.67 merge • I.H. 35E (South R.LT.) from the I.H. 35E/U.S. 67 merge to the Dallas CBD • I.H. 30 from I.H. 820 in Tarrant County to the Dallas CBD • S.H. 183/S.H. 121 from I.H. 820 in Tarrant County to the Trinity Freeway • I.H. 35E (Stemmons) from F.M. 1171 north of S.H. 121 to Loop 12 • Loop 12 from I.H. 35E (Stemmons) to S.H. 183 • S.H. 161 from I.H. 635 to I.H. 30 • U.S. 75 from F.M. 544 north of S.H. 190 to I.H. 635 • I.H. 635 from S.H. 161 east to I.H. 30 (East R.L.T.) Strategic Regional Arterials Mobility 2010 identifies over 400 miles of Strategic Regional Arterials as candidate facilities for construction or other capacity improvement in arterial street corridors by the year 2010. The level and type of improvement on each facility are subject to feasibility and design studies. Types of improvements to facilitate traffic flow include grade separations, median and curb access controls, parking restrictions, signal progression, and other traffic engineering enhancements. The Plan also includes 5,400 lane miles of arterial street improvements identified by local governments to be in place by the year 2010. The recommended Strategic Regional Arterials and local arterial improvements will be evaluated and refined in the development of the 2010 Regional Thoroughfare Plan, a follow- up effort to Mobility 2010. Unmet Roadway Needs Illustrated in the Mobility 2010 Plan along several major freeway corridors are Unmet Roadway Needs. These locations are shown to identify freeway corridors where sufficient right-of-way is not available for at -grade widening to serve projected 2010 traffic. Traffic forecasts indicate that in several of these corridors, express freeway lanes or parallel capacity improvements are warranted. Feasibility and design studies must be conducted to determine the appropriate freeway design in these locations and the feasibility and cost effectiveness of parallel improvements. MOBILITY 2010 UNMET ROADWAY NEEDS UNMET NEEDS FOR PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 3 Why is the Regional Transportation Plan Important? The rapid growth of the Dallas -Fort Worth region in the past decade has led to increasing transportation problems. An encouraging business environment, tax advantages, a favorable climate, and available land continue to attract many businesses to the region. While growth has many benefits, the recent rate of growth has urbanized land so quickly and has so overloaded our transportation system that available financial resources to improve transportation have not kept pace. In 1986 congestion occurred in nearly all of the northern portions of Dallas County and portions of eastern. northeastern, and western Tarrant County. Implementing the Mobility 2010 Plan will reduce congestion. however, portions of northern Dallas County are expected to remain congested even with the Plan in place. With new business comes increases in employment and population. (lliw Employment for the year 2010 is expected to reach 3.2 million. This is a 53 percent increase over 1986 levels. In addition, people try to live within reasonable commuting distance of their jobs. In 1986, 3.3 million people lived in the NCTCOG Transportation Study Area. By the year 2010, over 4.5 million persons are expected to live in the region (comprising Dallas, Tarrant, and parts of Denton, Collin, Rockwall, Kaufman, Ellis, Johnson, and Parker Counties). %c.r - _ ooc 'cr IM Im Congestion decreases an area's attractiveness and can lead to relocation of population and employment and loss of business; this congestion makes serving clients difficult and causes higher, unproductive labor costs when workers are delayed in traffic. The regional total cost of congestion today is estimated at $2.9 billion a year; by 2010. this cost will exceed S8.2 billion annually without the Mobility 2010 Plan. Implementing Mobility 2010 will reduce 2010 congestion costs by $5.1 billion annually. Vehicle miles of travel (VMT) is a measure of the total daily miles traveled by all vehicles. In 1986 there were nearly 78 million vehicle miles of travel in the region each day. The forecast for 2010 indicates that daily travel will approach 124 million vehicle miles each weekday, a 59 percent increase. VMT in suburban areas is expected to increase by 68 percent and in rural areas by 95 percent, as development in the region continues to expand and grow into suburban and outlying areas. To serve this increased traffic, the region will need to build new facilities, as well as rehabilitate and reconstruct aging roads and bridges. Also needed will be more traffic signals and complex control systems to ease traffic flow, and additional parking facilities. NCTCOG projections indicate that an expenditure of $15.8 billion for new roadway construction will be required regionwide before the year 2010 to maintain the current level of service. Yet only $9 billion is currently programmed. Rapid growth also brings problems such as increased noise from heavy truck traffic and increased traffic accidents. The use of open space for highways and interchanges is also an issue, as are the lurking problems of foreign oil dependency and possible supply disruptions. Increasing numbers of commuters will seek relief from roadway congestion and other problems by using transit. In 1986 daily transit ridership for the region was 174,000; by 2010 this figure would increase to 208,000 with committed improvements and to 240,000 with improvements outlined in the Plan. It must be emphasized, however, that Rather, the situation can be prevented all the transportation problems brought from deteriorating further. This is what on by growth cannot be solved; the the Regional Transportation Plan is growth has occurred too quickly. intended to do. What Impact will the Plan have on Air Quality? In order to measure the air quality impacts of the Mobility 2010 Plan, the recommended transportation system was evaluated using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency MOBILE4 computer software. This was done to ensure that the Mobility 2010 Plan would not result in increased nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions. The analysis included a comparison of projected emissions from the Plan with estimates from both the 1986 Baseline and the 2010 Do -Nothing alternative, which assumed no improvements would be made to the transportation system. The results of this evaluation indicated that implementation of the Mobility 2010 Plan would reduce non - methane hydrocarbon emissions below either the 1986 or Do -Nothing alternative levels. Based on this analysis, the Mobility 2010 Plan is anticipated to conform with air quality plans set forth for the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area - Mobility 2010 Conformity Evaluation Projected Weekday Nonmethane Hydrocarbon Emissions (TONS) 1986 Base Year 400 2010 Do -Nothing 143 2010 Plan 116 How was the Regional Transportation Plan Developed? The process to develop the Mobility 2010 Plan began with the completion of the NCTCOG/ SDHPT/ DART travel model validation. The travel models were validated for years 1980, 1984, and 1986. The next step of the process was to develop year 2010 baseline traffic and transit ridership forecasts on the year 2010 committed transportation system. A detailed assessment of the 2010 baseline forecast was done to identify future congested locations and transportation system needs. The results of the baseline forecast were presented to local governments, planning agencies, and SDHPT in order to determine future needs and develop transportation system alternatives for evaluation in the Mobility 2010 planning process. One of the goals of the Mobility 2010 planning process was to identify a system of improvements which would reduce traffic congestion back to or below those levels experienced in the region in 1980. The degree to which this goal was accomplished was determined through a series of performance measures including the percentage of roadways congested during peak travel periods, travel speeds, and the amount of travel time spent in congestion. Following the diagnostic analysis of the 2010 baseline, a series of travel forecasts was prepared to evaluate system alternatives. Beginning with freeways, additional lanes were evaluated where needed and determined feasible based on existing right-of-way. New freeways and regional rail lines were then added and evaluated based on the traffic projections and ridership estimates. Those facilities attracting sufficient patronage to be considered effective solutions were retained as part of the Plan. High occupancy vehicle lanes and strategic regional arterials were then added to the system to address remaining congestion along major freeway corridors. In several locations, strategic regional arterials were included as options to new freeway construction. Finally, in severely congested freeway corridors, express freeway lanes were also evaluated as a means of addressing future travel demand. As a result of this planning process. the Mobility 2010 Plan represents a composite system of freeways, rail transit, general transit services, high occupancy vehicle lanes, strategic regional arterials and local arterial improvements identified to maintain regional mobility by the year 2010. Implementing the proposed Plan meets the goal identified at the outset of the process to maintain and im- prove upon 1980 levels of mobility in our region. How was the Plan Approved? After reviewing comments submitted at a June 1990 local government hearing, the RTC adopted Mobility 2010: The Regional Transportation Plan for North Central Texas on August 9, 1990. Subsequently, NCTCOG's Executive Board endorsed the Plan on August 23, 1990. Adoption of the Plan culminated a two-year process of evaluation and analysis guided by the RTC. Technical support was provided by NCTCOG's Transportation Department, the Regional Planning Office of SDHPT, FWTA, DART, and local government staff professionals. Mobility 2010 Process 1980 1984. 1Ed Demographic Transportationa 1980. 198a. 1986 Model Validation 2010 Demographic and Transportation Data 1010 Baseline Travel Forecast I _010 Transportation Needs ff,_20io Svstem Anernauves Mobility 2010 Who is Responsible for Regional Transportation Policy? In accordance with federal law, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) is designated by the Governor of Texas as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for transportation planning in the Dallas -Fort Worth metropolitan area. NCTCOG's Executive Board establishes overall policy for comprehensive planning coordination for the region: whereas the role of the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) is to provide a single policy direction for multimodal transportation planning and development. NCTCOG's transportation staff reports through the Executive Director to the Executive Board on policy decisions relative to the transportation operating budget, appointments of technical committees, consulting contracts, and the relationships of transportation planning with comprehensive planning. The transportation staff also provides staff support to the RTC. The RTC receives advice for policy direction from three technical advisory committees representing public transportation, highway transportation, and air transportation interests. These committees are represented by local government professionals, public transportation providers, private sector representatives, and representatives of state and federal agencies. The Regional Transportation Council's primary function is to assure coordination among transportation modes, local governments, and planning activities. RTC responsiblities include approval of the Regional Transportation Plan, the Transportation Improvement Program, and the Unified Planning Work Program. Transportation policy for North Central Texas is established through the institutional base of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and its Executive Board — with the Regional Transportation Council serving as an independent policy body for regional transportation improvements. What witl the Regional Transportation Plan Cost? Implementing all needed projects identified in the Regional Transportation Plan will cost approximately S18.5 billion in 1990 dollars. Of this amount. $10.4 billion will be for freeways. $2 billion for strategic regional arterials, $3.4 billion for arterial streets. $1.4 billion for rail, and $1.3 billion for preferential facilities (HOV lanes). Estimates place the annual travel time savings of the Plan at $5.1 billion, compared to the Plan's annualized cost of $1.85 billion. Cost estimates prepared for the Plan were based on unit costs. Unit costs for freeways and arterials were developed based on information in the Transportation Improvement Program and the SDHPT 10 Year Project Development Plan. HOV and rail costs were developed based on DARTs 1989 Transit System Plan. What Approach Should be Used to Implement the Plan? A Congestion Management System represents a promising opportunity for addressing some of the transportation needs of the region. While the rapid growth of our area over the past decade has resulted in positive changes in the quality of life and the economy, traffic congestion resulting from this growth has created many new challenges. Designing a transportation system which conforms to the needs of an expanding metropolitan area combined with increasingly limited financial resources remains a major issue facing our region. To address this challenge, congestion management along with the physical improvements in the Mobility 2010 Plan is proposed. This approach is based on identifying existing congestion levels and locations, monitoring changes in these levels, predicting future conditions, and developing and implementing strategies to relieve congestion. The implementation of major improvements should be based upon cost-effective solutions including operational considerations, such as transportation system management actions and demand reduction strategies used in travel demand management. This approach can increase the operational capacity of the existing system, reduce demand, and complement major capital improvements. Examples of transportation system management options include the following: • Encourage traffic signal timing and coordination • Expand traffic surveillance systems and emergency road patrols • Promote arterial traffic engineering enhancements such as one-way streets, left turn bays, continuous turn lanes, and improved intersections • Enhance freeway improvement plans to mitigate traffic congestion during construction Cost of Additional Improvements ($ Billions) Lane Miles of Freeways Lane Miles of Strategic Regional Arterials Lane Miles of Arterials Miles of Rail Miles of HOV Total Benefits Annual Travel Time Savings ($ Billions) Benefit Cost -Ratio 2010 2010 Committed Needed $ 5.6 $ 0.0 $ 3.4 $ 1.4 $ 0.4 $10.8 7 $10.4 $ 2.0 $ 3.4 $ 1.4 $ 1.3 $18.5 • Promote incident management which minimizes traffic delay Examples of travel demand management options include the following: • Encourage land use and developments which may be served through public transit, vanpooling, and carpooling • Coordinate rideshare programs among local governments, planning agencies, transit authorities, and major employers • Promote flexible work hours to reduce the concentration of travel during peak travel periods The private sector plays an important role in congestion management because coordination of transportation services with new development requires commitment by private enterprise. In light of funding restrictions, the traditional notion that transportation is solely the responsibility of government must be discarded. A joint public/private partnership can alleviate the problem of limited public resources and can deal with transportation needs better than government alone. Such a partnership is advantageous to the private sector because transportation services affect business. Working together can also avoid confrontations by resolving conflicts before they occur. The preparation of this document was financed through grants from and disseminated under the sponsorship of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration and the Federal Highway Administration (U.S. Department of Transportation). The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. $ 51 2.7 See inside of document for Mobility 2010 maps. IJULI41992 OFFICE OF CITY. SECRETAR.Z Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Sandy, On Thursday, June 26, 1992, I appeared before the Zoning Board of Adjustments to request a special use permit to teach home swimming lessons, per City Zoning Ordinance 480. Although I applied for and received the permit, I do not feel that the jurisdiction of the ordinance applies to my activity. I applied only as an accommodation to the city. The ordinance pertains to in -home -occupations. The definition of occupation is "one's habitual employment; business, trade". I am and have been employed outside my home full-time since 1987. Furthermore, I feel that my activity should and would be "grandfathered" due to the length of time which I have been performing the activity. I have been teaching swim lessons at my home located at 1414 Whispering Dell Court for ten years. I teach four days a week for either six or eight weeks. Furthermore, I checked with the city prior to beginning the activity and was told that the city did not restrict in -home swim lessons. My permit was granted, but only for one year which seems highly inappropriate and time consuming and in my opinion not required under the city ordinance. I would like to thank Karen Gandy and the members of the Board of Adjustments for the time and efforts spent to maintain the high "quality of life" in Southlake. .,Sincerely, Nancy -Moffat cc: Mayor Gary Fickes X Mayor. Gary Fickes Mayor Pro Tem: Richard W. Wilhelm Councilmembers: Barry K. Emerson Jerry Farrier Stephen W. Apple Sr. Jon Michael Franks Michael J. O'Brien City Manager: Curtis E. Hawk City secretary: Sandra L. LeGrand 04 Im City of Southlake July 14, 1992 Nancy Moffat 1414 Whispering Dell Court Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: In -Home Swimming Lessons 1414 Whispering Dell Court Dear Nancy: Enclosed please find a copy of the applicable minutes for ZBA Case #151 regarding the special exception use permit for in -home swimming lessons at your home. The Board of Adjustment's secretary mentioned that you had not picked up the copy you had requested after the meeting. When I learned of a neighborhood complaint of lessons being taught after 7:00 p.m. last Thursday and Friday, I immediately thought that you might have misunderstood the Board's criteria for approval. You will note that they stipulated in item #5 that no lessons be taught after 7:00 p.m. To operate contrary to the conditions of the special exception use permit would be a violation of the zoning ordinance and thereby subject to the maximum fine of up to $2,000 per day for each violation. It is my hope that these minutes will alleviate any confusion regarding the parameters of your permit and eliminate any need for the issuance of citations. If you have questions regarding the above, please call me at (817) 481-5581, extension 743. Sincerely, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Karen P . Gandy Zoning Administrator Enclosure 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 - FAX (817) 481-0036 AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' Board of Adjustment Meeting page 2 June 25, 1992 Agenda Item # 4 continued. Nancy Moffat, owner/applicant, stated that since 1982 she had been teaching swimming at 1414 Whispering Dell Court and had no complaints until the summer of 1991. Mrs. Moffat further stated that she came to City Hall in 1982 and in 1985 and asked if she needed a permit or license to teach swimming at her home and was told no. Mrs. Moffat said, since the City of Southlake does not have a public pool she considers this as a public service and that she had dropped her classes from seven (7) to four (4) students per 30-minute class. She teaches 4 days a week for six (6) weeks during June and July. Mr. Edwin L. Doggett, 1416 Whispering Dell Ct., spoke in opposition of the request. Mr. Doggett owner of the adjoining property stated that due to the noise and the traffic he was opposed to the granting of the request. Public Hearing Closed. After a lengthy discussion a motion was made to grant Case # 151 the request for a Special Exception Use Permit for in -home swimming lessons per Ordinance No. 480, Section 44.12 (6) for one (1) year, expiration date being June 30, 1993 with th-e following restrictions: 1. Swimming lessons taught for no more than forty-five (45) consecutive days. 2. Swimming lessons no more than 4 days per week. 3. No swimming lessons given on weekends (Saturday & Sunday). 4. Swimming lessons will not begin before 9 A.M. 5. Swimming lessons no later than 5 P.M. except for fourteen (14) consecutive days during the 45-day period, the activity shall be permitted after 5 P.M., but not later than 7 P.M. 6. Maximum of five (5) students receiving instruction at any one time. 7 No non-resident instructors. 8. Applicant will provide a letter to each patron requesting cooperation in parking and traffic patterns to minimize congestion and obstruction to visibility by suggesting preferred parking locations and traffic patterns. TO: Curtis Hawk f FROM: Analeslie Muncy MAY 2 9 S2 �Iw L SUBJECT: Height of Amateur Radio Towers OFFICE OF DATE: May 27, 1992 At the last city council meeting John Wilder spoke to the city council concerning the requirement for a special use permit for amateur radio towers. He expressed his view that the process required for obtaining a special use permit creates an undue hardship and that the height restriction violates federal regulations. The regulations which he cited (47 C.F.R. Part 97) provide for the federal licensing of amateur radio stations and operators. These regulations do not themselves refer to local regulation of towers, but in 1985, the F.C.C. received comments and ruled on a request by the American Radio Relay League that local ordinances restricting effective, reliable amateur radio communications be preempted. After reviewing ordinances from all over the country, the F.C.C. ruled that local regulations that operate to preclude amateur communications are in direct conflict with federal objectives and must be preempted. On the other hand, the commission refused to specify any particular height limitation below which a local government could not regulate. As a general rule, the commission stated that local regulations which involve placement, screening, or height of antennas based on health, safety, or aesthetic considerations must be crafted to reasonably accommodate amateur communications, and to represent the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose. 101 FCC 2d 952 (1985) The Southlake height limit of 60 feet is less restrictive than many of the ordinances discussed in the F.C.C. Is opinion and would, in all likelihood withstand the test of reasonableness. The requirement of a special use permit would not run afoul of the general rule so long at it is not used as a pretense for exclusion, but is used to take into account special circumstances and to tailor requirements to specific situations. In summary, the current ordinance regulating height of amateur radio towers does not violate federal regulations. The City may want to review the ordinance to take into account Mr. Wilder's comments. It is not legally necessary, however, to do so. ay/ds slake\radic.mem N j City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 i T0: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Gasoline Leak at Justin Grocery I i I On Wednesday, July 15, 1992, at the southwest corner of Pearson and 1709 in the City of Keller, a Keller water line broke. Upon excavation, gasoline was found in the water. Keller repaired the 1' a and called us. in oil and Fire Marshal Roger Stewart observed At approxi.matelyfuel in the sMidnight on called the Texas Water Commis Ma the 15th, the Texas Water Commission, and our TheFire Texas hWater tested the gasoline tanks at Justin Grocery• Commission surmised that 12 to16ounce s . 01 fSamplesuel an hh were takead n leaking for an undetermined amountstrong from 70 and 80 feet from the tanks that revealed a very odor. d After the initial Pearson ruptured line up and close traffic. I have Works their The Keller water line extends under Pearson five to six services. a two inch line. The eating up the PVC and contaminated piece of repair, Keller's water line that crosses un er sity again. Thisthatcreated intersectionsto southbound e Pearson at visited with Steven Chutchian, the Director in Keller and their Assistant Director, Brad analysis of the situation. that is situated on the southwest corner for and proceeds in an easterly It is a four inch line that necks down is they problem seems to be that the gasoline non- they are having a hard time finding pipe to attach it. of Public Burry, for The road will be closed tonight and possibly all day tomorrow. There is a possibility that the Texas Water Commission bilon l demand a site analysis. In my opinion there is a possibility that the entire intersection, including a portion of 1709, be listed as hazardous material. I will have Roger Stewart monitor this very closely, but I think we should prepare for this setSathat•need tolbeatakenve e Fire h P IMarshal outline any of er Memorandum - Curtis E. Hawk Gasoline Leak at Justin Grocery July 16, 1992 Page 2 Mike Barnes reminded me that there is a 20 inch water line directly on the north side of 1709. Therefore, we may have a little more concern then just the roadway. Director Barnes is going to take some core samples to evaluate our particular situation. We should do this for our own protection, as well as information that may need to be passed on to the Council and/or citizenry. Our duty is to report an incident of this type to Commission and they in turn, when necessary, will As a safeguard I have instructed Roger to contact office of the EPA about this situation. This will accomplished in the morning. /C 4��: BC/mr cc: Mike Barnes Earnest Bramlett wp\Memo\Justin.Gas the Texas Water contact EPA. the Dallas be City of Southlake, Texas 14 M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Structure Fires Below is a synopsis of two recent structure fires within the City and the appropriate details. DATE: July 7, 1992 ALARM TIME: 3:05 a.m. LOCATION: 770 N. Peytonville Fire units were called to smoke in the area of North Peytonville. The two story unoccupied residence was fully involved at the rear of the structure. Trophy Club, Grapevine and Keller assisted. Estimated loss $480,000. Arson is a probability. Two paid officers initially responded, with approximately eight volunteers assisting. DATE: July 13, 1992 ALARM TIME: 7:26 a.m. LOCATION: 535 Love Henry Court Fire units originally responded to a vehicle fire in the garage. When the officers arrived, the three -car garage was fully involved. However, officers were able to make the structure save with some scorching in the utility room and smoke in the kitchen. Three paid officers initially responded, with approximately six volunteers assisting. .464:� BC/mr wp\Memo\Structur.Fir e r I@10V1 JUL 1 61992 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER NT July 13, 1992 Mr. Gary ekes Mayor, ty of Southlake 667 Carroll Road S hlake, Texas 76092 RE: Available Land Dear Gary: I have been asked by the owners of approximately 2.88 Acres of land (125,453 square feet) to see if the City might have an interest in purchasing the property identified on the attached Exhibit "A". The land is contiguous to Bicentennial Park and the City's recent acquisition from the Catholic Diocese. It would seem natural for the city to purchase this tract for future park or municipal facility expansion. It is not clear what price the owners would sell for. It would, however, be in excess of $150,000. Please let me know if this fits in with the City's acquisition plan. Sincerely, Phillip Bressinck PB/cdv Enclosures cII : Curtis Hawk City Manager 667 N. Carroll Road Southlake, Texas 76092 an dliliatc of The R.6. Group Advisors, Inc. 2400 L.I is • Fort Worth, "Texas 76106 • (817) 625-9974 9 Fax (817) 625-9978 EXHIBIT "A" n34.ys I ,\ t -g I �I � R � w _I i 'I ✓ I � � 1`dCO%IE PROPERTIES • OFFICE SPACE • 4VAREHOUSES • LAND • RANCHES • LOANS 94)ZeW4 ;Zed 52,a& NCNB Bank Tower 5201 North O'Connor Blvd. Suite 300 214/869.1471 CARLO J. FARINA, JR. Irving, Texas 75039-3702 FAX 214/869-1472 July 13, 1992 Mr. Phil Clegg 4067 Beltway Rd. No. 103 Addison, TX 75244 Dear Phil: Will you please bring me up to date as to your progress with the City of Southlake regarding your development. The reason for this inquiry is due to the fact that I was informed by Jan Littlejohn that he has been contacted by the Minority Ministers Assn, who are seriously looking for smaller lots for the development of low income housing. Some of the lot owners in the Westbeach Addition have been talking to the minority ministers and told them to contact Mr. Littlejohn for information as to development of low income housing. According to our agreement, the lot closing is scheduled for July 31, 1992. Please advise me of your firm intention to close as I now have other potential purchasers. Thank you. 1 Sincerely, Carlo J. Farina,. -Jr. CJF:emf G�GA.�� �' Betty Springer �A 1024 Mission Drive Southlake, Texas 76092-8883 (817) 481 7082 eC-i��� ,F:f� Community Band Carol Lynn Mizell, Conductor presents a GAZEBO CONCERT Twilight Concert Sponsored by the Grapevine Historical Society The Gazebo Grapevine, Texas Monday, June 29, 1992 7:30 p.m. This project is supported in part by a grant from the GRAPEVINE CONVENTION & VISITORS' BUREAU PROGRAM National Emblem March E. E. Bagley Fantasy on American Sailing Songs Clare Grundman Hornet and Peacock • Lowlands What Shall We Do With the Drunken Sailor? Rio Grande Them Basses Emperata Overture Americans We Let There Be Peace on Earth G. H. Huffine Claude T. Smith Henry Fillmore Sy Miller & Jill Jackson Arranged by Ralph Hermann Let there be peace on earth, And let it begin with me Let there be peace on earth, The peace that was meant to be With God as our Father, Brothers all are we. Let me walk with my brother in perfect harmony. Let peace begin with me, Let this be the moment now; With ev`ry step I take, Let this be my solemn vow: To take each moment and live each moment In peace eternally. (1) Let there be peace on earth, And let it begin ... let it begin! REPEAT (2) Let there be peace on earth, And let it begin with me. Armed Forces Salute Arranged by Bob Lowden The Caisson Song • Semper Paratus • The Marines' Hymn The U. S. Air Force • Anchors Aweigh Excerpt from the 1812 Overture P. L Tschaikowsky Arranged by Mayhew L. Lake Highlights from Man of La Mancha Joe Darion & Mitch Leigh Arranged by James Ployhar Man of La Mancha • Dulcinea Little Bird, Little Bird • The Impossible Dream The Stars and Stripes Forever John Philip Sousa LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND Carol Lynn Mizell, Conductor PERSONNEL FLUTE & PICCOLO Eb ALTO SAXOPHONE EUPHONIUM Debbie Beeson Allen Heath Scott Crowe Lynne Berman Sarah J. Maki Dave Meers III Christine Curtis Jay Phillips Kate Moose Alice Godbey Lisa Wiken Mary Kay Knutson TROMBONE Patsy Mattingly Bb TENOR SAXOPHONE Scott Crowe Marcey Mullins Greg Dedrick Branon Dunn Allison Parks Les Gibson Rusty Mayben Cherry Peacock Alfredo Robledo Richard Morrow Cynthia Perkins John Perkins Diana Sheppard Eb BARITONE SAXOPHONE Gene Pfalzgraf Christy Westmoreland Beckie Underwood Douglas Pinion Sandy Westmoreland Dennis Westmoreland TRUMPET Gary Whitis OBOE Tracy Arrington Michelle Mizell Edward Burns TUBA Irene Moose Geoffrey Heath Mark Boren Jerry Jamrich Frederick Moose Bb CLARINET Colby Springer Shary Moose Jim Blackwill Reid Strange Lee Schulica Ruthie Graham Jenny Keith HORN PERCUSSION Denise McKenna Terry Collinsworth Margaret Cook Shirley Morrow Bill Dedrick Bruce Davies Debbie Pinion Kay Meers Bruce Fusselman Kathy Rice Paula Pratt Dick Graham Mary Jo Small Ken Stone Joe Nelson Ginger Williams Peggy Rouh LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND OFFICERS 1"2 President: DENNIS WESTMORELAND First Vice President: BETTY SPRINGER Second Vice President: PATSY MATTINGLY Treasurer: PATSY MATTINGLY Equipment Manager: ALFREDO ROBLEDO Librarian: JENNY KEITH Special Thanks To: CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL, Rehearsal Space DENTON COMMUNITY BAND, Music Library UPCOMING PERFORMANCES: Kiwanis Children's Clinic Fireworks Show Joint Concert and Fireworks Music DENTON COMMUNITY BAND LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND PATRIOTIC CHOIR Saturday, July 4, 1992 Fouts Field, University of North Texas, Denton 8:15 p.m. The LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND rehearses on Monday evenings, 7.00 - 9:00 p.m. in the Band Hall at Carroll Middle School, 1101 North Carroll Avenue in Southlake. New members are welcome! Monetary donations are greatly appreciated, and may be TAX-DEDUCTIBLE! Call Dennis Westmoreland, President, for further information: (214) 252-8546 Office • (817) 481-4372 Home The LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND began in January of 1992 with the help of a number of interested musicians from the Southlake area. The ensemble made its debut under the direction of Carol Lynn Mizell, Conductor, at the Carroll Band Boosters Variety Show on April 3, and drew a standing ovation from the crowd. The Band consists of players of all ages, many of whom have not played their instruments in 20 years or more since high school or college days. Several of the musicians are joined by spouses, children, and even grandchildren in the ranks. The Band is currently seeking fmancial contributions from individuals, corporations, and municipalities in order to establish a music library and cover other administrative costs associated with the group. Contributions may be TAX-DEDUCTIBLE. LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND 1992 SUPPORTERS As of June 22, 1992 CONDUCTOR'S CLUB ACCENTS Texas National Bank Grapevine Historical Society MINOR CHORDS Phillips Minerals, Inc. Charles & Margaret Clarke Presentations, Inc., Joe Charbonneau Name _ Address City — State _ Phone _ e Ci11 ties Community Bandt\ 1350 LAKzviEw SotnauxE, TX 76092 Zip Contributions [ ] Conductor's Club $500 or more [ ] Top Brass $250 to $499 [ ] Accents $100 to $249 [ ] Major Chords $ 50 to $ 99 [ ] Minor Chords $ 25 to $ 49 [ ] Band Aids Under $25 Other Support _ I would like to donate an instrument or music. _ I would like to join the LAKE CITIES COMMUNITY BAND. Instrument: _ I would like to help usher and serve at receptions for performances. Please keep me informed about future performances. I would like to donate 1355 Ten Bar Trail Southlake, Texas 76092 July 6, 1992 DFW Airport Board Noise Control P.O. Drawer DFW DFW Airport, Texas 75261 Dear Board: I live in the southwest corner of Southlake, near Goode Airport off of F.M. 1709, at the intersection of Ten Bar Trail and Woodbrook drive. I am writing you to report noticed changes in landing patterns of planes at DFW Airport. When the "Southlake Runway" was constructed and put into operation several years ago, I observed that if the planes coming from the south and circling the airport to land with a south wind stayed on course, they would be considerably west of my house before making their approach to the Southlake Runway, which is essentially down the S.H. 114 corridor. This procedure has been generally followed over the years, with few exceptions. Lately, however, there have been increasing planes coming from the south that are "cutting the corner" to the runway approach and are coming right over my house at about 500 feet elevation (estimated). During the past month, we have had thunderstorms building to the west in the 6 to 8 p.m. time frame; during these periods, all planes arriving from the south "cut the corner" to avoid flying into the storm area. I have no problem with that; in fact, I compliment the air controller/pilot's judgement in avoiding the bad weather. I do not like the fact, however, that this "cutting the corner" is becoming the rule rather than the exception, as more and more planes are turning directly over my house at low altitudes. An American Airlines DC-10 turned directly over my house at 8:15 a.m. on July 5, 1992! For obvious safety reasons, and in accordance with your previous procedures, I urgently request you enforce your original landing patterns and refrain from allowing planes to "cut the corner" as they make their turn onto the Southlake Runway from the south. An another related issue, planes from the south landing south on the main north - south runways have always flown over my house, at an altitude around 700 -1000 feet (estimated). Lately, however, these planes are flying lower and lower, and on June 14, 1992, at approximately 5:00 a.m., a plane from the south going to the main runway flew over my house at about 500 feet (estimated). I believe this is too low to be flying over this part of the city. These same patterns have been observed with increasing regularity over the past month, with planes being observed cutting the corner and flying too low for the main runway approach on June 27, 1992; the planes were doing this all day, starting as early as 5:00 a.m. and as late as 11:00 p.m. at night. Page 2 I respectively request your assistance in enforcing your previously agreed upon landing procedures from the south and west to avoid creating another "pocket of residents" wanting to do battle with DFW Airport. DFW Airport is a neighbor and a valued business partner to Northeast Tarrant County -- please do your share to keep that relationship on good terms. You can contact me during the day at (817) 334-3876 if you need to discuss this matter in detail. I would appreciate a response to this letter. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, A A Jr McCrory Copy furnished: Mayor Gary Fickes Mayor of Southlake 667 N. Carroll ttla ke, Texas 76092 City of Southlake, Texas TO: FROM: CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 Curtis Hawk, City Manager Chris Terry, Asst. to the City Manager SUBJECT: BOB POINDE%TER TENNIS LESSONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ The Southlake Parks and Recreation Board unanimously moved to recommend that the City Council approve implementation of a proposal from Mr. Bob Poindexter of 2902 Mesa Verde Trail in Grapevine to conduct youth tennis lessons in Southlake. Mr. Poindexter proposes offering tennis lessons to Southlake children ages 8-16. The lessons will be offered August 3-23 at the Bicentennial Park courts. Classes will be held three days per week for approximately 1 1/2 hours per session at $20.00 per participant for each week of lessons. The lessons will be limited to approximately 15 students who will be divided into three co-ed age groups consisting of: a beginner class of 8-11; a beginner/intermediate class of 12-15; and an intermediate/advanced class of 13-16 years old. The Bicentennial Park courts will be unavailable for general public use from 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. each day of the lessons. If this tennis lesson program proves successful and sufficient interest exists in the community, Mr. Poindexter would like to offer expanded youth and adult tennis lessons into the fall season. Mr. Poindexter is a member of the United States Professional Tennis Association (U.S.P.T.A.) and has been employed as a sports director and tennis professional at various resort facilities across the country. Poindexter is currently employed with the University of North Texas as Assistant Men's and Women's Tennis Coach. The standard 5% in proceeds collected from the tennis program would be retained by the City. A copy of the City's recreational services agreement is attached. SEE ATTACHMENTS. STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF SOUS 1*400- COUNTY OF TARRANT PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This agreement is made on the day of 1992 between the City of Southlake, herein referred to as "City" and Mr. Bob Poindexter herein referred to as "Coordinator," who will provide the services to the City noted on the attached Exhibit "A. 1. The activities and services herein described will be conducted by and under the supervision of the Coordinator, subject to the following conditions: A. The Coordinator will not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, national origin, age, disability, creed, religion, sex, or place of birth in the provision of services to the public, and will comply with all applicable provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1974, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. In addition, the Coordinator understands that the City may cancel this agreement at any time for any reason. 2. The Coordinator assumes all responsibility and liability for the acts or omissions of the Coordinator and its officers, agents, servants, and employees arising from the conduct of Bob Poindexter or his representatives and the performance of this agreement and Coordinator agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its elective and appointed officers and representatives and all employees and agents of the City from any and all claims or causes of action on behalf of any person, firm, officers, agents, servants, and employees related to or arising out of the conduct of the Coordinator's tennis lesson program or the performance of this agreement. 3. The Coordinator understands that this agreement is not accepted or final until it is approved and signed by the authorized representatives of the City- and that this agreement may be terminated at any time by either party without cause. 4. The Coordinator and the City both agree that this contract shall terminate immediately with no obligation by the City to pay any amounts to the Coordinator under this agreement unless a minimum number of participants are registered and paid in full prior to the registration deadline established. The City reserves all right to determine minimum number of participants and/or payments. 5. Terms of Payment: The Coordinator shall be responsible for payment to all subordinate help and for all necessary supplies, equipment, etc. 6. Subject to earlier termination as provided above, the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning upon execution. 7. This agreement is specifically made subject to compliance with the "Program Outlines" and the "Proposal" to the City of Southlake by Bob Poindexter attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes of this agreement. 8. It is expressly understood and agreed that Coordinator shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor as to all rights and privileges granted herein and not as an employee of the City; that Coordinator shall have exclusive control of the exclusive right to control the details of the tennis lesson program and its operations on the premises and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, subcontractors, licensees, and invitees; that the doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply as between City and Coordinator; and that nothing herein shall be construed to create a partnership or joint enterprise between City and Coordinator. Coordinator Phone Number Address City Bob Poindexter CITY OF SODTELAKE Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager State EXHIBIT "A" City of Southlake July 13, 1992 Parks and Recreation Board Janet Murphy, Chairperson Dear Mrs. Murphy and Board Members; Thank you for the opportunity of this inquiry, for establishing a youth tennis program, in conjunction with the City of Southlake. At this time the summer is about half over, but there may still be enough time to develope a small scale tennis instruction program, for area youth during the first several weeks in August. I envision morning and/or evening classes, three days per week. Additionally, three groups of instruction levels, which would be co-ed: 1) Beginner, 8 to 11 years, 2) Beginner/Intermediate, 12 to 15 years, 3) Intermediate/Advanced, 13 to 16 years. Class size would be limited to ten to twelve participants. I would suggest that each enrollment session would be for a total of four hours, for two or three days, and that the coaching fee would be $20 per participant. I have enclosed my credentials and background, which does not include my most recent association with the University of North Texas, as assistant men's and women's tennis coach. If the board finds that it would like to establish a youth tennis program, for the City of Southlake, please contact me so that we could work out details. My phone is 817-488-8376. Thank you agaitynfor your time and consideration. Sincere Bob Poindexter U.S.P.T.A. IN Ste_ � Robert Allen Poindexter 11 2902 Mesa Verde Trail . Grapevine, Texas 76051 i 817-488-8376 CAREER SUMMARY Diversified and accomplished performance record with 20 years of national and international progressive experience within the hospitality, sports club, and resort management industry. Expertise includes: event program developmentin conference and convention settings: coordination of the successful and timely completion of projects: and management skill resulting in consistent profitability, and fulfillment of customer and owner expectations. SELECTIVE ACHIEVEMENTS • Developed a marketing and sales plan resulting in $1.800.000 in revenues and $445.000 in profits. • Responsible for a 150% increase in profits in three years. • Turned an operating loss into an operating profit in less than one year. • Developed and implemented a departmental safety program which resulted in no lost time accidents. • Recipient of Managerial Excellence Award. • Outstanding educator in a major metropolitan school system: high school Teacher of the Year Award. • Co -director of a fund raising event for a major health care provider: resulted in New Patient Care equipment • Divisional officer for a national association; contributed to an 18% membership increase J�t' - ✓1 Robert Allen Poindexter H Page 2 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE DFW HILTON EXECUMrE CONFERENCE CENTER Grapevine. Texas 1985 to Present • Sports Administrator Responsible for the total operations of a multi -million dollar sports and fitness club.including: staff hiring and development: activities: retail sales and inventory controls; budget and cost controls. preventative maintenance and safety programs; marketing on local and national levels. • Consultant and Instructor Responsible for the development of leagues, tournaments, instruction programs and special events for conference center clientele. RESORT AND SPORTS CLUB MANAGEMENT 1971 through 1984 • Club manager, sorts director or tennis professional with the following properties: California Country Club. North Miami Beach. Florida, a subsid- iary of Caesars World. Inc.; Oriole CountryClubs, Margate and DelrayBeach. Florida. subsidiary of Oriole Homes: Jacaranda Country Club. Plantation. Florida, subsidiary of Gulfstream Land and Development Co.: Carriage House Yacht and Tennis Club, Miami Beach, Florida: Emerald Beach Hotel, Nassau. Bahamas, a subsidiary of Corrigan Properties, Dallas. Texas: Fountainbleau Hotel. Miami Beach. Florida: International Tennis and Ski. Austria. Italy and Switzerland. DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, Miami, Florida 1969 to 1971 • High school teacher: Miami Senior High School - Sociology and U.S. History. EDUCATION Parsons College. Fairfield Iowa — Bachelor of Arts History and Political Science. major Education. minor 1969 Continuing education: d management, customer relations. and Company developed and sponsore marketing seminars. 5'4 - 6 \ w r City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D t July 16, 1992 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Appointment of Liaison to C.I.S.D. Councilmember Stephen Apple has agreed to serve as Council Liaison to the Carroll School Board, as previously discussed, however, to make this appointment official, Council approval of Resolution No. 92-32 is necessary. Duties of the Council Liaison to the School Board are to coordinate periodic meetings between the City Council and the School Board in an effort to create a better understanding and cooperation between the two governing bodies, and to enhance the overall community of Southlake. If you have questions, please give us a call. /sl N '\ ' w City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION N0.92-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, APPOINTING A COUNCIL LIAISON BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Citizens of the City of Southlake, and the community to have good communications between the School District, the Citizens and the City Council of the City of Southlake, and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Councilmember Stephen W. Apple Sr., be and is hereby appointed by the City Council of the City of Southlake, to serve as the Council Liaison Officer between the City Council and the Carroll Independent School Board. Section 2. Duties of the Liaison Officer will be to coordinate periodic meetings between the City Council and the School Board in an effort to create a better understanding and cooperation between the two governing bodies, and to enhance the overall community of Southlake. Section 3. Suggested topics to be discussed during the joint work sessions between the City Council and School Board include: The Selective Services Officer Program; Joint Use of Land for Parks and Schools; Update of City Developments; Joint Use of Facilities; and other interests of mutual concern. Section 4. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor J 0Z 1992. City of South lake, Texas CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: i SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety Canine Program Last year there were budgeted allocations for a canine unit within the Southlake Department of Public Safety. At this time we are ready to implement an official canine program. The development of a policy governing the canine program was essential for the protection of the City and citizens alike. That policy has been drafted and in its preparation, guidelines and suggestions from Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education, the Houston, Fort Worth, and Dallas Police Department K-9 Divisions, and the Texas Municipal League were utilized. Attached is a copy of General Order 42.2.17.0 which is the General Order governing the canine program and its operation. ,Also attached is a copy of the Resolution that we are requesting be passed in order to officially recognize the canine position. The Texas Municipal League will list the canine under personnel and liability insurance at the standard $202 rate for police personnel. I have available complete documentation of breeding and schools on both the handler and canine, including the two week recertification school completed in May. To reiterate some points of interest that were discussed during the budget, the canine is trained and can be utilized in controlled drug searches, lost children and building searches. The canine has already been utilized by the school district and will continue to be utilized strictly at their request. He will be housed in a small pen at the northeast side of the building during the shift when the dog handler is on duty. In most instances the animal will be restricted to that area until a request for service is made by either our officers or a neighboring community. Our animal is of quality breeding and training, with Officer Wyrick having invested approximately $7,000 to $8,000 of his own money in the purchase and training of this animal. Memorandum - Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Canine Program July 15, 1992 Page 2 I am available for any questions or comments that you may have. /5 6-It BC/mr Attachments (2) wp\Memo\K9Prog.Imp 41.2 SUBJECT: PATROL OPERATIOIJS This Order consists of the following sub -subjects: 41.2.17.0 CANINE (K-9) PROGRAM 04-18-92 PURPOSE This General Order establishes guidelines related to the operations of the Police Canine. POLICY PHILOSOPHY The Southlake Department of Public Safety incorporates the use of canines into the patrol operations for the purpose of enhancing the safety of the officers, the increased detection of narcotics, the apprehension of escape suspects, and the location of lost persons. 14.2.17.0 CANINE (K-9) PROGRAM 04-18-92 I. Definitions Canine Unit - means team consisting of a canine and its handler.' Handler - means the police officer to whom a specific law enforcement dog is assigned, and includes the police officer authorized to serve as a handler in those cases where the primary handler is incapacitated. Canine - means a dog specially trained to perform police functions under the control of a handler. K-9 - is an acronym for canine II. Program Structure A. The principal purpose of the canine unit is to serve as a support unit by assisting in the detection and apprehension of suspects which are hiding, evading, or pose a threat to officers; detection of narcotics and drug paraphernalia; and to provide security or support at special events or unusual situations involving crowd control. B. The minimum requirements for a R-9 officer to be considered for selection is as follows: 1. Minimum of three years of police patrol experience. ' 2. Demonstrated ability of the handler and the canine to operate as a K-9 team. C. The minimum requirements for a canine to be considered for selection as a team member is as follows: 1. The canine is able to perform on and off of lead exercises that include the following: a. Heeling - fast pace b. Heeling - slow pace c. Turning - 90 degree right and left, and about d. Automatic sits e. Response to voice and hand signals at a distance of 30 yards to sit, sit and stay, recall to heel position, cease attack. 2. The canine is able to perform agility skills that demonstrate his ability to negotiate obstacles similar to those that are likely to be encountered during service. Examples include: a. Five foot (51) wall scale with a relief platform on the opposite side b. Three foot (31) high window jump c. Culvert or tunnel crawl d. Low level, narrow, suspended walkway 3. The protection skills required below are intended to employ the necessary force needed to protect the handler from assault, pursue a fleeting felon, and complete other necessary law enforcement activities. Those skills include: a. Handler Protection - respond to the aid of the handler without command. b. Stop a Fleeing Person - pursues an aggressive and threatening person and cease pursuit on command c. Gunfire - pursue a suspect while under gunfire d. Narcotic Detection - able to locate narcotics hidden from view e. Search - able to search a building and an open field for a person, and find that person - 4/ D. The appointment of the K-9 team is under the discretionary authority of the Director of Public Safety. The Director of Public Safety may make additions, adjustments, or deletions in the K-9 program at any time. III. Assignment And Use Of K-9 A. The K-9 unit is assigned to the Police Services Patrol Division under the supervision of a shift sergeant whose direct area of responsibility includes the following: 1. Ensuring that the canine handler and the canine have both undergone the required training programs before assigning them to a canine function. 2. Ensuring in-service training requirements are met to maintain a high level of proficiency. 3. Assigning canine presentations and demonstrations as requested and appropriate. 4. Submitting required reports and statistical • information related to K-9 operations. 5. Supervision equipment needs and submitting necessary requests for items in a timely manner. B. The K-9 is to be housed in a designated kennel area at the Southlake Department of Public Safety building when on -duty and not responding directly to a request for service. C. The primary duties of the K-9 team includes the following: 1. Building searches 2. Suspect searches outside 3. Searches outside for lost persons 4. Narcotic detection and searches in buildings, open fields, and vehicles 5. Backup and security operations at special events or unusual situations involving crowd control S�.s D. The use of the K-9 is at the discretion of the handler with authorization of the shift supervisor and within the parameters of this and other applicable policies. Generally, the final decision to utilize the K-9 in a specific law enforcement operation remains with the handler once on the scene. However, if the patrol supervisor determines the use or non-use is appropriate, the decision of the supervisor prevails. E. All outside agency request are handled in accordance with mutual aid procedures and agreements in place at such time of request. IV. Building and Area Containment Searches A. Officers on a scene requesting the canine team maintain containment of the perimeter of the area or building to be searched. B. Personnel avoid, if possible, contamination of the search scene pending arrival of the K-9 unit. C. If officers have entered a search area or building prior to the arrival of the K-9 unit, the supervisor on the scene ensures all personnel are out of the area prior to the K-9 unit beginning their search and advises the K-9 handler the scene is contaminated. V. Search For Lost Or Missing Persons A. All searches for lost or missing persons are conducted on lead except in an emergency. An emergency includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following: 1. Children and/or elderly persons lost or missing in weather conditions that could be hazardous if they are not located in a timely manner. 2. Lost or missing persons who are believed to be injured and a delay in finding them could constitute a hazard the that person. 3. Under circumstances deemed an emergency by the commanding officer on the scene. B. It is the responsibility of the handler using a canine off lead for searches under this section to insure that the canine is muzzled. The handler takes precautions to prevent injury to the victim. VI. Use of Force A. K-9 units and handlers function within the guidelines of the departmental policies and procedures and the state and federal laws governing f the use of force. B. In any instance where the handler permits the canine to make an unjustified attack upon any person, such action is considered as unnecessary and excessive use of force. C. In those cases where there is a reasonable anticipation of the use of force, the K-9 will only be used to apprehend suspects when there is probable cause to believe the officer will encounter resistance from the suspect or to locate a suspect attempting to elude capture. VII. Use of vehicles A. Passengers in a vehicle utilized by the K-9 team is limited based upon the discretion of the handler and under the direction of the supervisor. B. The handler ensures the any vehicle used for canine purposes is properly and thoroughly cleaned after each and every tour of duty. VIII. Guidelines For Departmental Personnel A. Personnel refrain from petting the K-9 without the permission of the handler. B. Employees refrain from teasing, taunting, or harassing the canine except when specifically instructed to do so by the handler as a part of a training exercise. C. Personnel follow the instructions of the K-9 handler during operations employing the use of the K-9. D. Except in emergency circumstances or with prior approval of the handler, personnel other than the handler refrain from giving commands to the canine. E. The designated canine is the only animal permitted to be housed in the designated K-9 kennel run. The housing of any other animal, even for short terms, subjects the canine to unnecessary risk of disease. I%. Reports and Reporting A. Whenever a Southlake R-9 unit bites a subject, whether while operating in this city or as a part of a mutual aid agreement, and whenever a R-9 unit operates within Southlake as a part of a police operation and a bite occurs, the following steps are undertaken: 1. The subject bitten is provided with proper medical attention. A "refusal of treatment" form is completed of the subject refuses treatment. 2. The handler advises the shift supervisor, as soon as possible and practical to do so, that a bite has occurred. 3. The handler and the shift supervisor observe the injuries sustained, and if possible, photographs of the injury or alleged injury are taken. 4. The injuries or alleged injuries are carefully documented in writing, and includes the circumstances surrounding the injury. A dog bite report form is also completed. B. Each activity call is recorded on the appropriate record form and submitted at the end of each tour of duty by the canine officer. The report is reviewed by the shift supervisor and forwarded as required. C. A monthly summary report is submitted each month by the canine officer. The reports includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following: 1. Total training hours 2. Total number of police actions by categories • 3. Total number of arrests made by the canine 4. Total quantity of narcotics found/seized by the canine 5. Total cost of operations D. An annual summary report is completed by the Divisional Commander and submitted to the Director of Public Safety for review during the annual budget preparation process. X. Public Relations and Public Presentations • A. The canine handler ensures that the conduct of the team is undertaken to ensure a positive public image. B. Public demonstration are permitted under the following conditions: 1. Demonstrations have the prior approval of the Divisional Commander or higher authority. 2. All demonstrations are conducted with the handler in police uniform. 3. only members of the department or specialized canine personnel are permitted to actively participate in the demonstrations. 4. The safety of the audience holds priority throughout the demonstration. 5. Members of the audience are allowed to pet the canine only in the presence of and with the permission of the handler. XI. Uniform A. The canine officer wears the standard police uniform for normal duty functions. A specialized coverall with City of Southlake DPS shoulder patches, badge patch, and name tag are permitted for special condition operations such as field searches. B. The canine is provided a breast harness with a badge patch situated on the chest of the canine. XII. Training and Care of Canines A. Both the canine and the handler successfully complete the certification training before being authorized for service. B. K-9 officers and their canine receive training as determined necessary by the Divisional Commander, but includes as a minimum the following: 1. A minimum total of 8 hours of in-service in- house training, segmented into a minimum of four separate sessions, during each month. Each area of ability; drug search, building search, open field searches, and command responses is covered during each month. 2. An annual re -certification training course for both the handler and the canine. The certification includes validation of competent performance in the following areas: a. Obedience and Agility b. Office3Z Protection c. Open field searches, aggressive d. Open field searches, non -aggressive e. Building searches f. Drug detection 3. A minimum total of 8 hours of in-service training, segmented into a minimum of two separate sessions, on the gun range. C. Records of the training are completed by the K-9 officer, reviewed by the officer's supervisor, and forwarded to the designated training officer. D. A copy of all certificates received by the K-9 officer are forwarded to the Administrative Secretary for placement in the administrative files. E. The general care of the canine is the responsibility of the handler who adheres to the following guidelines: 1. The actions and activity of the canine is the responsibility of the handler who refrains from permitting the canine to roam at will. When not confined in a secured area, the handler ensures the canine is under direct supervision at all times. 2. The canine is groomed daily and provided an adequate and healthy diet. F. Medical Care 1. The canine is provided vaccinations for disease and illness as determined necessary by the veterinarian for the health of the canine. 2. The handler ensures that the canine receives proper and prompt medical attention in the event of injury or illness. Medical examinations are conducted annually, or more frequently if determined by the veterinarian to be necessary. 3. Any injury or illness is reported to the K-9 officer's supervisor and to the Divisional commander as soon as practical. %III. Financial Responsibility A. The Southlake Department of Public Safety provides a monthly stipend to the R-9 officer to assist in the care and feeding of the canine. The amount of that stipend is established as a part of the annual budget adopted by the Southlake City Council. B. The R-9 officer holds ownership of the canine and provides its service to the City of Southlake in exchange for the monthly stipend amount. C. The City of Southlake assumes certain financial responsibilities involving the care and use of the canine. They are as follows: 1. Necessary medical expenses 2. Licensing and certification fees 3. Providing necessary training and handling equipment 4. Training cost for approved training courses 5. Insurance coverage as necessary 6. Temporary housing facility at the Southlake Department of Public Safety building D. The handler assumes certain financial responsibilities involving the care and use of the canine. They are as follows: 1. Provide a secure, safe, humane home environment for the canine 2. Provide for proper feeding, care, and grooming %IV. Classification As An Officer The canine is classified an officer for purposes and intents of Departmental policy, and to that extent, the handler is responsible for the actions of the canine as if the action were conducted by the handler. City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.92-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, RECOGNIZING THE CANINE AS AN OFFICIAL POSITION WITHIN THE SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE SERVICES DIVISION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Citizens of the City of Southlake to provide Public Safety Services in the detection of narcotics, the apprehension of criminal offenders, and the locating of lost persons; and, WHEREAS, canines have demonstrated their ability to assist in such public safety endeavors; and, WHEREAS, the Southlake Department of Public Safety has established policy guidelines governing a canine program. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The position of a Canine is hereby recognized an official position within the Southlake Department of Public Safety Police Services Division structure. Section 2. The position of the Canine shall be governed by the policies, rules, and regulations as established by the Director of Public Safety and the applicable State and Federal Regulations. Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor 1992. City of Southlake, Texas TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager CITY MANAGER - lur -4 V Michael H. Barnes, P.E. Director of Public Works AWARD OF BIDS FOR POST OAR TRAIL, CYPRESS CREEK AND HIGH SCHOOL DRAINAGE On June 16, 1992, the Council authorized staff to bid the referenced project. On Wednesday, July 16, 1992, at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened and read aloud for the reconstruction of Post Oak Trail, Cypress Creek and the new high school drainage. Attached is the bid tabulation from Cheatham & Associates. The low bidder was J.L. Bertram Construction Company at $151,723.14. Bertram has done extensive work in this area and his work has been satisfactory. At the June 16, 1992 meeting, the staff presented to the Council an estimate of $155,000 for the reconstruction of Post Oak Trail and Cypress Creek and the high school drainage. The low bid received was below the staff's estimate of $155,000. The project will be funded from the 1991-92 Budget of $101,028 (970.00 Street Infrastructure Fund) and $70,000 from Perimeter Road Fees, for a total of $171,028. Also included in the funding amount of $171,028, is the cost of reconstructing South Peytonville, adjacent to the high school, which is estimated between $18, 000 and $20, 000. Therefore, the staff is in agreement with Cheatham & Associates' recommendation (attached) to award the contract to the low bidder J.L. Bertram Construction Company in the amount of $151,723.14. Please place this item on the Council's next agenda. If you have any questions, please contact me. w MHB/lc Attachment: Bid Tabulation Sheet Cheatham & Associates' recommendation letter c:lwpfdesbnanxt past erc.a»d 6-a -/ CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES July 16, 1992 Mr. Mike Barnes, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Post Oak Trail, Cypress Creek Circle & Peytonville Drainage Improvements Southlake, Texas Job No. 001-209 Dear Mike: JUL 161992 We have tabulated the bids for the subject project and the low bidder was J.L. Bertram Construction with a base bid of $151,723.14. We recommend awarding the contract to the low bidder. Please note that these bids included the drainage along South Peytonville at the high school, and the total bid was less than the total cost estimate for the entire project. If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \pustcyp.209 Enclosure ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 • Metro 640-4329 c�Gi —02-- Qi O N V- O O 0 Z m O i =sgaNggs � 2 N i y S .agg Nl fo7 N A ^ fV 1pO O QQ QQ 99QQ m 1� YW7 CY� 1[7 l7 A C^ v v �1 T Ql A 1NCl T n A A V V A u9 N f 01 N N {� N N N N 1n N IA to N N 64 N inW toN l7 N N — O`= x N f {{ t p p p p p p p O S 8 V,= C= 8 N S 8 8 8 8 8 R 8 Q Q0N W Nm m O. g 1 W ( �U i 1 S tG �000n f� tA7 $ n885� ^ LU 0 F O xa 2 d A N .O- A N a O S U- Q i ' A { p p p p p p p p p p p O 8 O 8 O O8 O O O Opp Rpp apoD N 8 n j N ( Q a�T p t � 8 n N N �O m A O� QNi N- �D O O d N U W N S ? d N i V i m N t0 A N A e'f tp ' N N Pf N N N NN N N N N N N N N eD 10 m Oto ! O¢ N$ N i N N N N `+ I S }X^� j d JF CY pp p p p p p p p p p tp i08A-4: P-% O OGOp C W LL N[ m U Z g8o88 O A 0 0 n Pf N N n M t j j <_< Oa i ill NRRi ��NNAAf 17 Ilj! Q NOau.Q i a ! A882R8888888888 a O tmtpp N' H E eaRoF.40 took gn88888 O! A N A O 0 Ol O O to N O O S. N V O n ZZ m 4 �D 2 N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N t0 A 2 1p ?Qyi S 4 W 2 Co pp Cp p pp pp pp pp pp N N O l07 O a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O tii m= r U Oi G G rc ei h ai t Q 30 F.: �a f NN i a aU.< i 7 ttppC n N a0 ONE N N aOD 8 8 8 C 8 8 8 8 8 17 1 F.. ! M .t Of A�p A LV f y Ny 8 R O off 1p� 8 8 N s h Vol or A �7 OI OI 1f7 01 A N A ppQqffl1 I Z Q OA f V i O O .fD O� N N M N N N N ^ - A N N N N N• M N N w Z `m°� —E :�R^gs�msssss8sm8 7 m A_z z J 8sCL z i A A a LL Q 6 . i 2 pOff �OOp11 toy N Q= t N S Z~ N tN0 ^ 1NO A A^ A A m i ^ a j 0 w a . 2•t ' z i } } ZO } } } } LL LL } ZO ti a M y } tN H J W J J U J U Of F- M 0 O) 6 J J 6ui Z U W ICL Q S l W y Q W Q¢-j Q �O ZF W3 a Q QaYwO WV OU W W Z Z>= W O Q <Y ©O WWO WOm^}y i}aOu+ teR a U W CL Q Z }•ev } m Z U F Z y V+ W C FaO g Y W E C, W OF0 V joxa� ww =m W¢rOi ° N O O O N FW- V t V 1W- LL? m Q 5 ui t >W "u�(UaN azSc�aa¢03 aUo3 YJ l CC O� N O0 LA- H~}° (i 1 xU �yf 007[ 0=0�i�+�wiv m Q Q U V W ,p V J W Z Z- x O W_ i FF N W le V U U> U U d N fA ¢ Z j N ao. 8 W IL �22= 9�uivr=-�o(n v U J a � iV ¢ tG to to N :r 0 ~t O ° — u~i J ►a- W Z m m 30 O � N A. of b A m 0/ O^ N A f N 10 A .. _ .- ° ° Z !_4 8j 8888888888888888.8 8 0 N( f. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 N N W N N -A N N N N W W N N N NiN N i U N 0 ( i N i tii m Z W I C U . i z m i s' =�i°ai m i a U. t ! 8i 88888888888888888 8 0i� N ( H 0000000000000000V. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V. 0 N V i i H V j m ! i p jt t: a4.< O Q. € i 10 A 8 8 8 0 m m N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Ao at N n ' A < Ol com O V I N: A 1fl (� 1f1 t{pp N N N w NN N N N 44 M N N /A M fa N m a 2 AGoM N N I `gyp m � ^m o LLI 888= �iZ�88888888o88C ° I O y W^ ap m i% _U AN G - G O fC t7 O v` 0)Q N elf . Z Ccw Z p J O Z¢ a N f N m a w a U. < ' 8( I 8 N O N m O O 8 8 8 8 A 85� 85� 8 88 88 8 i 8 { y C,7R 90SU-112W 5 $ m V � U i 25�S�2mp525 O &% a^ m Qi R * '" a e v a Vol N N N f N N N N H N afp N A I F; ' ^ N I N N N N N N Vol sQQ 8882 8 8 s 8 88888888u"88 Q o N $ CN. . 5OfO JmjZ < O SU. dm a N CL: i t N ( Z i i 2 F. m�mmmm000m�� ��52� �fa i n n e') Cl) f O i i g Z i a j i i ^ i O `. us I i S m I J I H Q € i I 2 I W i V i .' i J d w m < w Y r r i W> C i = O W y J a W Qa W I U a y O 0 Z • w W N d Q ! I a i m N m 0 w w O a Z w _J } W W 0¢� W¢ �_ Q p� p ° m N C V¢ a V 3 Y tQi U w T Z i Q i U d y CL I.-- i< ? 2~ O � N.. p '') W} LU Y cl W 2© w V r 2 d C � V 1 O ( qQ 0 ° co N W W V W U W Q U) O F- F- t H LL' Z_ a j Z W O co J W C I <O wN«z5i<w0F3F�Fu'� < N m ui N �8 O < h pp Q i _NX �mN<<UUUJ.a U JW ZZ�X 2 . < 2 O N 1 rr< O U p Y Y W m Y Y V< O Z W N t� )y V U U> C U U> to M IZ Z < J rn a 8 ! w0r►-njm�rCLa.COo 71 M0. iN CC ro i0 i0 Nf�FON pr 1-• O w i W O ` •` N �7 f rr) �O A m C) O ^ ^ ^ f N tp A 0 t Z 11 City of Southlake, Texas Road Construction Projects. Estimated Costs May 1992 Project Description Estimated Cost 1. Reconstruction of Peytonville Road, west side of new high school $ 2. Underground pipe culvert parallelling west of new high school $ 3. Reconstruction of Post Oak Trail (6" asphalt, 6" stabilized subgrade) 4. Reconstruction of Cypress Creek (6" asphalt, 6" stabilized subgrade) 20,000 35,000 90,000 $ 30,000 $ 175,000 Funding: Budget $101,000 Perimeter Street Fund 70,000 Street Materials Fund 4.000 $175,000 rI»pfikA%vnwIw nara,d City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, City Planner SUBJECT: 1993 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Approval of Project Submittal Summary Attached you will find a letter from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) dated June 8, 1992 and a Resolution (Attachment 1) approved by the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) which describe a new project selection process for federal and state funding of highways and principal arterials. In summary, the ISTEA Act shifted project selection authority from the Highway Department to entitities known as Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO). The MPO for the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex is the NCTCOG located in Arlington. Staff has prepared the attached Project Submittal Form for your consideration. Upon approval by Council, we will submit these projects for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Many of the organizations involved in this selection process are still determining the extent of their responsibilities so the first submittal will probably be a learning process for all involved. Our submittal includes projects which probably have a longer horizon than the 1993 TIP intends but it will establish our need for these improvements at a future date. In the coming years we can fine tune our project data and specifically target our projects for a certain type of funding. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh Attachment: NCTCOG letter dated June 8, 1992 RTC Resolution Project Submittal Forms MEM0/T0.CEH PLANNER `. � Regional Transportation IN ;!*; Council P.O. Box 5888 • Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 JUN 1 2 1992 OFFICE OF CITY ,.ff FROM: The Regional Transportation Council DATE: June 8, 1992 Michael Morris, Transportation Director, NCTCOG TO: Honorable Mayors and County Judges City Managers and County Officials Texas Department of Transportation Officials Transportation Authority Officials Texas Turnpike Authority Officials SUBJECT: Project Selection for the 1993 Transportation Improvement Program With enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) came new responsibilities for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), as the MPO for the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area and the Denton and Lewisville urbanized areas, has been assigned project -level programming responsibilities for 1) suballocated Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds in Transportation Management Areas (TMAs), 2) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAO) funds in ozone nonattainment areas, and 3) Transit Program funds in TMAs. NCTCOG must select projects in consultation with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the transportation authorities. At its May meeting, the Regional Transportation Council (RTC), as the transportation policy committee for the MPO, adopted the enclosed Intermodal Project Programming Policy for 1992 (Attachment 1). NCTCOG staff has begun preparation of the 1993 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is the implementation program of projects from the Regional Transportation Plan. Outlined below are the different funding programs included in the TIP and the deadline for the submission of projects. The RTC will consider full program flexibility of the urban STP-MM fund allocation. STP-MM funds are those Surface Transportation Program funds which are suballocated to the Transportation Management Area. All high priority needed transportation projects should be submitted to NCTCOG for consideration by July 24, 1992. Examples of such projects are included in Section 5 of the enclosed resolution. A sample format by which to submit your projects is included in Attachment 2. Please provide additional documentation, as you feel necessary, to support the proposed projects. The Transportation Policy Body for the North Central Texas Council of Governments (Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Dallas -Fort Worth Region) Page Two June 8, 1992 In addition to those projects for Surface Transportation Program funding, projects to be funded under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program should also be submitted to NCTCOG by July 24, 1992. Examples of qualifying projects include interim high occupancy vehicle lanes, signal improvements, intersection improvements, carpool programs, bottleneck removals, etc. Attachment 2 can also be used to submit candidate projects. Requests for Transit Program funds should be submitted to NCTCOG by July 24, 1992. Due to air quality planning requirements, all transit projects must be included in the TIP regardless of funding source. Instructions for submitting this information are contained in Attachment 3. Please list your agency's new transit projects on the enclosed blank coding sheets. Also, projects in the 1992 TIP which were not funded during the fiscal year must be carried over into the 1993 document and relisted. Different coding sheets are provided for the Annual Elements for formula capital and operating assistance projects (Section 9) and for discretionary capital assistance projects (Section 3); a third form is provided for listing all projects for later years. Notice that at the time you submit transit TIP projects, you must provide documentation of planning iustification financial capacity, and private sector particioation in support of your proposed program. Please plan your projects with sufficient accuracy so that no major revisions will be required during the 1993 Fiscal Year. The enclosed resolution explains in more detail the specifics of our new responsibilities in the development of the Transportation Improvement Program. It is anticipated that $153.7 million ,, may be available for transportation projects. If you have any questions with regard to this process or need assistance in the development of project needs, please call Dan Kessler or Dan Lamers. Transit questions can be directed to Shirley Henry. All staff members can be contacted at 817/640-3300. The mailing address is: va Enclosures Michael Morris Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments P.O. Box 5888 Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 S� - 3 Sincerely, A4(1e*-VL--) Michael Morris Director of Transportation ATTACHMENT 1 INTERMODAL PROJECT PROGRAMMING POLICY FOR 1992 WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) has been designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area, with the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) serving as an independent transportation policy committee; and, WHEREAS, the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area has a population greater than 200,000 and has, therefore, been designated as a Transportation Management Area (TMA); and, WHEREAS, Collin, Dallas, Denton, and Tarrant Counties have been designated nonattainment for ozone by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and, WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) assigns project -level programming responsibilities to MPOs for: (1) suballocated Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds in TMAs, (2) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAGI) funds in nonattainment areas, and (3) Transit Program funds in TMAs, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: Section 1. That the Regional Transportation Council endorses the $14,471,000 of transportation projects presented this date and listed in Attachment 1 to this resolution which have been charged to the urbanized Surface Transportation Program (STP-MM) during the ISTEA interim period. Section 2. That the yet to be let $1,206,000 project listed in Attachment 1 to this resolution to widen Handley-Ederville Road is conditionally approved, contingent upon confirmation on June 11, 1992, by the RTC that this project ranks high enough against other needed projects contained in STP-MM. Section 3. That the other three categories of Surface Transportation Programs (STP-UM, STP-RM, and STP-R) listed in Attachment 1 to this resolution and the National Highway System program of projects presented this date are endorsed by the RTC. Section 4. That future projects selected this fiscal year by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are not endorsed unless selected in a cooperative fashion with the MPO as required in ISTEA of 1991. OR Section 5. That the RTC intends to consider full program flexibility of urban STP-MM fund allocation and requests by July 24, 1992, all warranted transportation projects ready for letting after October 1, 1992, and within the next three years. Examples of these projects include, but are not limited to: a) RAILTRAN Commuter Rail line. b) Immediate action High Occupancy Vehicle lanes c) Transportation System Management and Transportation Demand Management projects (e.g., regional incident detection and response systems, motorist assistance programs, intersection improvement programs, and rideshare programs). d) Projects from any mode aimed at improving air quality (although the RTC may fund these projects in the Congestion Mitigation and Air (duality Program). e) Nonfreeway arterial street improvements: of regional significance, on the Principal Arterial Street System (PASS), on the Mobility 2010 strategic regional arterial system, or functionally classified as principal arterial. f) Low-cost freeway improvements which are bottleneck relievers. Section 6. That the RTC reaffirms the cooperative spirit necessary to implement the most cost-effective transportation projects in ISTEA and will perform this duty in consultation with all impacted parties, including but not limited to the citizens at large, TxDOT, DART, the T, local governments, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. Section 7. That Surface Transportation Program funds (STP-MM) will be initially suballocated in the region based on formulas of need, anticipated to be approximately 1 /3 to the area encompassed by TxDOT District 2 and 2/3 to the area encompassed by TxDOT District 18. Section B. That the Regional Transportation Council will select projects in the Dallas -Fort Worth urbanized area, which is the boundary in which funds are allocated to the region. Section 9. That the RTC requests TxDOT to review previous commitments to local governments using Federal Aid Urban System (FAUS) funds and report to impacted parties, including the RTC, those projects earmarked with FAUS funds. ' ,� "5- Section 10. That no projects have been approved with Congestion Mitigation and Air Ouality funds, and the RTC intends to program requests received by July 24, 199Z from all warranted transportation projects ready for letting after October 1, 1992, and within the next three years, especially those relieving congestion and improving air quality. Section 11. That the RTC requests from TxDOT funding program totals that are the responsibility of the MPO. Section 12. That these guidelines are intended to assist the Technical Committees to develop the appropriate selection procedures and the RTC Program Subcommittees to recommend specific projects in consultation with TxDOT and the transportation authorities. Section 13. That the RTC will pay particular attention to unfunded projects already committed by TxDOT and the transportation authorities. Section 14. That the RTC requests TxDOT policies to be revised to remove STP and CMAQ programs from the TxDOT funding cap requirements so project selection can be made on the best project, regardless of mode and funding cap restrictions. Modifications to these policies are encouraged which would maintain funding flexibility in the remaining program. Section 15. That this resolution will be transmitted to all impacted local governments, TxDOT, DART, the T, FHWA, and FTA. Section 16. That this resolution shall be in effect immediately upon its A / ` adoption. Art Martin, Chairman Regional Transportation Council Deputy Mayor Pro Tern, City of Plano I hereby certify that this resolution was adopted by the Regional Transportation Council of the North Central Texas Council of Governments for the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area on May 14, 1992. Michael Morris Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments A ti <i � 7 �D F� ♦ � O O O N M N N M E � F fV N ♦ � � N N �V N f'� �t 3 O r « 1 1 1 1 oil ��• � � � r s � s a � � e � w a e si sk M Ir IN .i •i a Oa / • M •rs •� a 0 a o a 1/ 0 K +i FI a .+ ac r .o 11 • H YI � K • O .+ O .+ • � � y � .•1 M arr ,C K .aa a • i w s ate+ O •�aa .4 • O • All �:: a a • O ao� o as • c 0 • Y • e -no e a o" e e a.a 0 o `14 s s ��Y1M 000000 aartoca•••• oorrraaaa +1•4 YIN Y1 YI YI ••S;.a.,C4iCitit .4 Q a.m.-1ivili/i EaiEa,7M/1N64 aa,eaaaaaaa . C; .Y fV PIf YI .ONTO. ,� 1 1 s _ City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-25 Zoning Change Request/S-P-1 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for Block B, Lot 1, Hart Industrial Park, being 0.919 acres out of the J. N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591. LOCATION: 1219 Brumlow Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: Alice and Richard Diles dba Gymnastics Plus CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with gymnastics/dance studio uses The site plans shows a 3,000 sq. ft. addition to the building on the east side. The plan also indicates variance requests for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces (48 to 39) and revisions to the bufferyards as noted on the plan. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7) RESPONSES: One (1) in favor: * J. P. Weiss, 1215 Brumlow Ave., "The property has been used as a gymnastics studio for years and should continue. It is good for the area because it will draw more people and get more exposure for existing areas. New housing area may use the studio as well." During the public hearing, H. D. Thompson, 1363 Brumlow Avenue, strongly opposed the required fence along his north property line. P & Z ACTION: June 18, 1992; Approved (7-0) subject to the June 12, 1992 Plan Review Summary except for item $2 (bufferyards). The Commission recommended no bufferyard along Brumlow Avenue and substituting eight (8) trees in the Southeast corner of the lot instead of the required plantings. They further recommended granting the variance for reducing the parking spaces from 45 to 39. (Please note that Staff has since recalculated the parking requirement and has found that 49 are now required.) 7A-1 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ZA 92-25, Zoning Change Request July 15, 1992 Page Two COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1992; Approved (4-0) deleting Bufferyard "C" on t along Brumlow Avenue, reduce bufferyard on east to two (2) trees only, and reduce the bufferyard on the South to twelve (12) trees only and no fence requirement. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Second Plan Review Summary dated July 2, 1992. RPG 7A-z CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING Submittal Date: Case Number: ZA y�-25 Fee: $100.00 Receipt No. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT Name: GYh?�t/!�_STIC_ ek9J< Agent: AUCE/l.�S Address: 1a19 0Au�,6�✓ d�ccl!/C,O,cc, T Telephone: 9/ - i%8g OWNERS) (if different) �laCt"!41'?JCW~ /Jiies 19WW7 5 B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal Description: ( ) Property is unplatted according to the County Deed Records Vol. , Page It is shown as Tract of the Survey, Abst. No. , City Tax Records. ( ') A metes and bounds description is attached. ( �r Property is platted and described as: Subdivision Name: Ma ImPA. Io i Aw- Block A, Lot(s) / Block , Lot(s) ( — ) Address of Subject Property: Id I gy Property Location: Acreage: 0. 67 ?-"q L ( ) A typed mailing list of all property owners within 200 feet of the subject property is attached. ( ✓) A current survey or plat map is attached. ( ) A concept plan shall be submitted for "CS", "SF-3011, "SF-20A", "SF-20B", "MF-1", "B-111, "B-21', "HC", "S-P-2" zoning requests. (Required prior to development site plan submittal, but optional at the time of zoning request for "0-1", 110-211, "C-1", "C-2", "C-311, "C-419, "I-1", "I-2" zoning districts.) ( [� A development site plan shall be submitted with zoning requests in the "MH" and "S-P-1" znninrl districts. IA-3 City of Southlake Application for Change of Zoning Page Two D. NATURE OF THE REQUEST: Present Zoning: T I Requested Zoning: 5- P— 1 Existing Use: C j'i 05TIC-S/t%Ac e .4 Proposed Use: Reason for Requesting the Change: AUTHORIZATION BY OWNER(S): g 06- &Pan5164 . I (We) hereby authorize the City of Southlake and its employees to enter upon the premises herein above described at all reasonable times for the purpose of erecting, maintaining, or removing signs to notify the public of the pending zoning application and/or public hearing concerning said application. I (We) release the City of Southlake and its employees from liability for any damages which may be incurred to my (our) property in the erecting, maintaining, or removal of said signs. I (We) further understand that it is necessary for me (us) to be present at the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council public hearings. Signature o Name M E. AUTHORIZATION IF AGENT INVOLVED: M.Dles or Prin- Dat 2yMa I, Alice M. D; les , owner of the aforementioned property do hereby certify that I have given my permission to ,"chn Irv► ft to act as my agent for this rezoning request. Abu M. D1 �C5 Izs 1yu Signature of Owner(s) Name Typed or Printed Date Before me, a Notary Public, on is subscribed to the foregoing he or she executed the same for expressed. Giv n under my hand and seal of 19 Uj . f yin! ✓ &r NOTARY PUBLIX IN AND FOR TEXAS My Commission e PL:bGc OF TEXAS 03n 9194 this day personally appeared A11cc N.Di (f known to me to be the person whose name instrument and acknowledged to me that the purposes and consideration therein office this g` day of Q the 11 tk day of 7A-4 A -, 1914 . FFLj /M'�ER MIDDLE \\ s `i c 'c_ �` r. �4- = _ •••. �I -7 }Y is i.T �� --��� ( wl�yJ'f /t.:$i ��. �•� ' i S,• fsSr.rs S i. S. YST /, rs•u -__ f . _ —rT t1O.NuAS F IAO?AP SYeK• YsT 41 IM[ • u r r - apt - _ LARD - '��:'1 CITY OD rT HAIL xr R�tMn'� PS IC-' r1 Ili YyL. )�. •%� ,D ,D .Ci I ' Y. ',•I,).r •4' ,. ... I 1 2, te. i• f! F. GRoJ M�I� SQI�t E- p J • .•i•41 I \ M� f%•. 'PI J` I _ 11 S �- - i_�_ I�I,c/ r1G : r Y N ,� n •,.re)D ; I =Dr ��• JOHN A. F N �I I I ' I SURVj•sill IM 2• G L �.�-- — SURVEY pfL •c 1 i r...__. .e It Its J — —r sung. •esir rt•os, I •s[r L S It 0�•�' \� I I)r K 71 �!L i � i`j •i tDr - � LK I r-- 1 EE L. i -rt I r.i �"r j lrtM I! r[ i,s• [orT ...1 s.vo I I I I ! I I I I 3• X )G X 2. i __- _ T-��. " r , ,. 2•L;. if, r ir•• !im : ! f0 )C .• •.,LTI� II J t e2r ri.:i ion: APS 2))r yr. SyY [• —• ` ^ K• SfIfK, YST rsJH I 1 -- 1 r.l I �� •'� - -t[•• HALL \�AIEDLIH IS )sr l; I � 1'IL7' swv[• Y z � 1 • r er I I ) �I f r��•�l�t al l , (: ]fr2 Icr co`` Jf K — '•. I �, ''E` \ Ir' 1 SY.r[` YST M 432 IA-5cutI ( FPO sc - r-.J I .•r• • a� gg , TR 1A 17 AC Bear Creek comm. (Timarron) "R-P.U.D." TR 10 44.66 AC TR 1 4.66. AC ^R 1 F AC - -- CONTINERTAL-S=, TR 2AI TR 2A21 .28 ACI.22 ACC TR 2A1 + .5 AC TR 2 TR 2F1 ' .88 1 �(� AC 6.3 AC SUB 21 ag0 14 c 2 o � m Weiss -Tex Morse, J.M. TR 2C1 cc cc .667 AC - 2 U ST I --- A 3 --.� ART „ PA 4 `'� 1 I-1 f f 1 3� McSpedden. R.L. HART STREET Fletcher,C. j CC U 3 2 3 CC 5 o "I-1" a J = (Z M Thompson, H.D. TF 2E2 a A_ �.5 AC 4 'AG„ Wright, J. rJ TR 2Fa ,J 1 5.31 AC 591 i i T , 6 i 3._ AC TR 2=7A �a AC - -- IA-4 uj fY Nib M CL W N �� co OCC OF�Q �- Ozm a r o W U. J6� ,oar oZ eta x M z f y6�.ns ao� c O to �V0 8tr'Z9L 3„Lb, oOS - -- q9 -- -- — £1 °£ 4( ��- � S3 �lll�iln 51. ' - � _- l� U I z (p U') a tlj U 1 W w U to OD ? F. N Q OD 0 J' w rr N Q � w u � w d N i 00,991 j 69£Z m ou an0-D -18VH`-4 m Q O b0a0N j b162.0 N D N M..OZ L9'6BZ SI w v -- - tD 0 ao (D 00 Q m o - 0 W O I_ Ql tL 6N ASS 'i, Ulf 0 z � m U. rn b 9'9 6 -" 0' £ I I - t- w - 1,ws3 3Oz 0� o „ a .- MZZ0. O N m O i N 3 'n'B 'a S I . r C C (V -88'68 Z -- ti 0) o ? W - ---M „60,10.0 N CID co Q I O _j o Y '� z m Q (D D 0 �" w CV '� cn Z U cv " w m 0 O d IQ rn N N M Z M I (D (10 0) rn - F- 0 Z —� N m 0 m 0. M b500.ON w X Wo 8 m Q1 0 N 111- j £6�1►�1 = dam' N OLL _ N _ . m 3 o o ° -0 z N I N M e 9 H l a O N v z zzn CD 0 „60 , • 0-N N M � Q M O) NI _ M m '� OD Q 0 h to W N 1p h Q I Vi ti a^ = O o a o Ib O , m z oo s;b:i' f Lo Boa MOa 80J o3.LVD103o,Li•.- 09`'Osl u ,. "and Mn1wnmA - —_ - --S City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-25 REVIEW NO: ONE PROJECT NAME: DATE OF REVIEW: 6/12/92 Site Plan - Gymnastics Plus Lot 1, Block B, Hart Industrial Park OWNER/APPLICANT: Alice & Richard Diles 1219 Brumlow Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: Fax: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce Street Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Label the existing zoning and L.U.D. on the lot to the east. 2. A bufferyard Level 'F11,is required along the south property line and bufferyard Level 1G ' along Brumlow Avenue. 3. Show and label the existing septic field. 4. Add a note as follows: "Masonry will be provided on all facades facing a public street". Add masonry variance request in the table if this is not intended. 5. Show typical dimensions for all parking stalls. 6. Show the side and rear yard setback lines on the plan. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by June 29 , 1992. All revised submittals should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x 11" reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Alice Diles John Levitt PARK as "'SrAl C 5- f7 C0 R T S TR. E, T CaVC APRON MtrC�f N C=rw a"-M? & �60* ROW) SLOPE AAWN * I.CX PS s ' I "S IPF r /p 67/0, 74 r/p Sol j 1. r,78-9 3 Ex rw. 609 23 /p '09 -60 30- 8I.DG UNE //—,/P �2 'J 6' COAC S,7CCWA4A( Z60 1-5 -LD R 809.00 DOOR, eC1705M I / / "C STORY aRICK / �� HAarcrous' ' AND METAL SLOG. '/ � I Ott Jae 1';_ : 2 19 BRL:-'-�LON AVE. A I/ 0� "X 70 CONC. CN MCC c z :9J4 . so 60-9 C .70CR /* 609' 20 5' CON X, —60-9. 70 Ail c FL,6111.3 p JA-1 i-my ur auutmdKv, i uAas IM SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-25 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 7/2/92 PROJECT NAME: SP1 - Site Plan - Lot 1. Block B, H OWNER/APPLICANT: Alice & Richard Diles 1219 Brumlow iSouthlake, Texas 76092 Phone: Fax: Plus ndustr ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce Street Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/25/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. A bufferyard Level 'F1' is required along the south property line and bufferyard Level 'C' along Brumlow Avenue. 2. A total of 48 parking stalls is required. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Alice Diles John Levitt �a wr wrr. rw ■nzi ■Dii■rli7�x0 310er2s •s aos i .+►i,T. aim 1 •/.I. ._vv 1A-11 -f ORDINANCE NO. 480-7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACK OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.919 ACRES OUT OF THE J.N. GIBSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 591 AND BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCK B, LOT 1, HART INDUSTRIAL PARK, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIV OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUS , PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVID G A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN HE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DAT . WHEREAS, outhlake, Texas is a ho ule City acting under its Charter adopted y the a ec orate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location,and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-1" Light Industrial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of 4M73. SP 1 /O RD/kb Page 1 7w - / Z this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air;: effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 0.919 acre tract of land out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, being legally described as Block B, Lot 1, Hart Industrial Park, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 480-73. SP1 /ORD/kb Page 2 7,2,, - / 3 • Frc;m "I-1" Light Industrial District to S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District allowing any use in the "I-1" Light Industrial District and a gymnasics/dance studio. The above -described tract of land shall be further subject to the development regulations set forth in the "I-1" Light Industrial District and any other restrictions and requirements set forth on the approved site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morales and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 480-73.SPI/0RDAb Page 3 / Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affection zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provision, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1992. ATTEST:' CITY SECRETARY MAYOR PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1992. ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR 4M73.SP1/0kDlkb /7a Page 4 I City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 1 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-23 Zoning Change Request REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for Block 1, Lot 1, Wilkinson Addition, being 4.873 acres situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038. LOCATION: West side of South White Chapel adjacent to Big Bear Creek (Southlake City Limits) OWNER/APPLICANT: Terry L. Wilkinson CURRENT ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family-20A Residential LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential which includes one -acre and smaller lots NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: June 18, 1992; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1992; Approved (4-0) to table until July 21, 1992. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff waived the required Concept Plan because of the limited size of the project and the accompanying plat revision. KPG FA- I i. CITY OF SOL'ILAKE APPLICATION FOR AMENL`b= TO ZONING SLAP Application No. ZA J).-IJ To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it mist accompany this application.'k NAME OF APPLICANT: Terry L. Wilkinson ADDRESS: 849 W. Continental Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 DESCRIPTIOIN ( SATES ACID BOLZS) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE REZa4T D: See Attached ZC1v LNG REQUEST: FROM: RE T0: R-20 This application dust be accompanied by a List of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. —r-F Dt1TE MWGRE OF PERSON FILING NEST BE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared 'J Qn L i>. i "Y1 known to me to be the person whose nacre is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the sacre for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this �,� ` day of YV-1,a I , 19 NARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TEAS .NIy Cor=ission expires the day of 19 fA-2 'ei zi—, C160i4 6=E•�1 S v ' I .unvE..s�M. szt i. — <_ �a : i - h �I lis c L IC I %i i • 1 1'1 I�Za •�irj, I { I• •� ]• , 1 I ts�- •� _-_41 ca girt .,Yf r z., ,• � .lsi atl �; _� i -J i i I a� .;�-»9�-- �.`--- �o o� ����- _ I�51 1, z, a zc i Z? a.; !:r % i T al"— +• w . PADEN .Y s1Mv6..)T421255 .or f�M/6wrl wit Ali I —� X•�. I!■r a.! t 1: i r.•.l �'/'/��Z�„ b a� uCT. 1 14 �j CC .wIII.K / ^•r!/�Vwaft �� 4w• K rl \II `` jib' i ►r r. I/�VYY l 13 K I Il••. V. =r � Bear Creek Communities a. •"� Q (Timarron) LLJ AC lJ L Monticello Lao 1 rto +.•t 1 00 _ .r. .R•. i '► ram. W. ! ::� r -� r I 1 v Q QT•�r _ i war • �• _ � �• �•' • !LACK 02 ., 17 KOCK 02 ; stm Y. 11011 OMM WAa MM 1 �i' 'ls � Bear Creek Communities wo ��s+ ci. �► �'- __ - 1 (Timarron) R 2F 1 MM'1.7 r w rr Will ti ■ tl•Cyti � •lM %11TT•Y j1:Ot1 —3F � 37.43 . tl..•>,•. � / -- err = � h^p = s -C40 1 9 - ,emu • W6tti • r ` ON38 AYM�33li� °•gt Ir :tt� LK�1 - lrlli zotk�W •- f / YSt r u � • � Lei RAC r* t !j Bear Creek Communities City of Colleyville �� (Timarron) //RPLTD11 1i•!(1 - S� 1V \ • '% O TR 1 F =' �� m . _ O 9. 49 AC 99Ir ' { C% 0- 14. 45 at ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING low• C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING a tract of land situated in the H. Medlin Survev, Abstract No. 10_18, Ciry of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being the same land platted as the Wilkinson Addition as recorded in Cabinet 'A", Slide No. 22,S of the Plat Records of Tarrant Count•, Texas, said tract of land being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron pin in the west right-of-way line of White Chapel Boulevard, said iron pin also being the most easterly southeast corner of Monticello Addition. Phase I as recorded in Cabinet "A', Slide No. 862 Plat Records of Tarrant Count•. Texas; THENCE S 11°23'25' W with the west right-of-wav line of said White Chapel Boulevard a distance of 840.78 feet to a 1;2-inch iron pin found for corner in the centerline of Big Bear Creek; THENCE with the centerline of Big Bear Creek and the south line of said Wilkinson Addition the following bearings and distances: N 86'26'35" W a distance of 79.00 feet, N 54°34'35" W a distance of 58 10 feet; N 12°10'25" E a distance of 47.20 feet; N 44°55'25' E a distance of 119.40 feet; N 03°04'35" W a distance of 152.80 feet; N 32°49'35" W' a distance of 163.90 feet; N 39°04'35" W a distance of 52.80 feet; N 50°04'35' W a distance of 140.18 feet to an iron pin set for corner; THENCE N 23°17'02" W leaving the centerline of said Big Bear Creek a distance of 55.69 feet to an iron pin set for corner; THENCE N 51`0_"(14- %V a distance of 42.1S feet to an iron Pin scat for corner: THENCE N -i'0','2S" W a distance of 53.O4 feet to an iron pin set for corner: THENCE N 41'31'31" E a distance: of 67.85 feet to an iron pin set for corner; THENCE N 59'55'29" E a distance of 44.45 feet to an iron pin set for corner, THENCE N 73elS'47" E a distance of 28.94 feet to an iron pin set for corner. THENCE N 09°01'I8' E a distance of 48.12 feet to an iron pin sett for corner; 'HENCE N C►9°51'05' E a distance of 44.75 feet to an iron rod sc, for corner; THENCE N 69�43*06" E a distance of 41.16 feet to an iron rod set for corner; THENCE N 56*35'21' E a distance of 43.01 feet to an iron reel set for corner; THENCE S 78°36'35' E a distance of 348.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and eontainine 4.873 V acres or 212,2M square feet of land, more or less. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-72 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480., AS AMENDED, THE MPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, EXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 4.873 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083, AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS BLOCK 1, LOT 1 WILKINSON ADDITION, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATES TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY-20A, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND ROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHE e�it��thlake, Texas is a home a City acting under its ted ectora a pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "RE" Residential Estates under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of 580.72/ORD/kb Page 1 this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 4.873 acre tract of land out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1083, and more commonly known as Block 1, Lot 1, Wilkinson Addition, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached 480.72/ORD/kb Page 2 a - 7 hereto and incorporated herein. From "RE" Residential Estates to "SF-20A" Single Family- 20A. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to �Irr correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section S. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the 480.72/ORD/kb Page 3 provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY 480.72/ORDfkb - 9 Page 4 S DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Page 5/ORDhb �% /9 Page 5 0 vity vi wuu "anc, 1 c-az R, M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-24 Plat Revision REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of the Wilkinson Addition, being a single lot addition to the City of Southlake, and being revised to Lots 1, 2, and 3, of the Latrobe Addition. LOCATION: West side of South White Chapel Blvd. adjacent to Big Bear Creek. OWNER/APPLICANT: Terry L. Wilkinson CURRENT ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate REQUESTED ZONING: 11SF-20A" Single Family-20A Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: None required. The applicant owns all of the platted property under consideration. P & Z ACTION: June 18, 1992; Approved (7-0) subject to the First Plat, Review Summary dated June 12, 1992. COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1992; Approved (4-0) to table until July 21, 1992. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Second Plat Review Summary dated July 17, 1992. KPG 86-1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 03/15/91 FINAL PLAT/PLAT SHOWING/AMENDED PLAT APPLICATION ITLE OF PLAT: Latrobe - SUB5MITTAL DEADLINE: /1 5;—, TOTAL LOTS: 3 TOTAL ACRES: 4.873 ZA 92-2 � APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Terry L. Wilkinson ADDRESS: 849 W. Continental Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 PHONE: 817) 421-8796 I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, amendments, and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the nclosed reques address any unresolved issues. Signed: Date: ,r.,tt,tw:w**s,r+r.,r+r*,►.n.,r,r*.w,r,r.**,r*.w*wu**,t**.uw..+r,r:*.ss,►**,r.*,r,r,t,r,r,t,►•*tru,►wrr*s**u,rw,r+r*+r::: For City Use Only: d�Q :# 6 0j-1Z I hereby acknowledge rec ipt of the final plat application and the application fee in the amount of = Oxon this the d.l' day of , 19 igned: ,A�I..� Title: +',�,rw..,r*w,r*,rwx*,r.*,r.sr*k*,r,►w:,e.**,e,r*w*t.w,►**,r+e.*:w*tu.*,r*,►w,r,r,r*.+r;.*,r,r*w**,►�:**.x,rsw* The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, amendments, and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Phan Applic. ✓ Permissible scale: 1"= 50', 1"= 100' (Prefer 1"=100') Sheet size shall be 24" X 36" North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity % Vicinity Map t� Appropriate title, i.e. "Final Plat", "Plat Showing", "Amended Plat" f Title includes Subdivision name, City, County, State and Survey and Abstract Title includes total gross acreage, number of lots and date of preparation f Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) e� Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) Courthouse filing record note provided MrWo Final Plat Page 2 of 3 �Wehown Not ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') On Plan Applic. v- Unplatted property: Name of record owner and corresponding deed record volume and page for all adjacent unplatted tracts within 200 feet, to include owners across any adjacent R.O.W. Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page !i- Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines v All survey lines shown and labeled v Existing zoning labeled on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersections shown with street names GENERAL SITE INFORMATION ✓ Legal description of the land to include: Current owners deed reference, name of survey, abstract, county, state, POS tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage ✓ Property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description ✓ Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. All property corners dimensioned to centerline of adjacent streets All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) (Plat Revisions) PROPOSED INFORMATION Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10, U.E. along the interior of the property line ✓10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. demensioned and centerline dimensioned with bearings v^ All curve data labeled (delta, radius, length, tangent) ✓ Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-R-1) ✓ Street names provided not similar to any existing street names ✓ R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned ✓ Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order ✓ Square feet of each lot shown (Chart format O.R.) Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted ✓ 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 down Not Plan Applic. Y v Final Plat Page 3 of 3 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. school, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above Calculated dimensions for all lots, street R.O.W. and centerline easements, etc. Flood plain limit shown. Floodway shown and labeled with dimensional ties Avigation easement shown if applicable (Appendix) Minimum finish floor elevations (No. 483-3.03-D-30) Note also provided (Appendix) Deed Restriction Statement (No. 483-3.05-C) (Amended Plat Only) Flowage easement note (Appendix 5) Sight triangle note (No. 483-8.02) Driveway access limitation note (No. 483-5.01-3) Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-A-8.01-E and F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-A-8.01-G) Not Included Included OTHER REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Complete and corrected water and sewer layout Complete and corrected Prelimenary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3.03-D-35) and No. 482 Perc tests for each lot not served by City sewer Certificate of taxes paid from City Tax Collector Certificate of taxes paid from County Tax Collector Certificate of taxes paid from School Tax Collector Any proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions Any proposed Homeowners Agreements and/or documents Developers Agreement (Prior to Construction) First submittals for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall include: Blueprints - folded 6" x 9" Reduction of plan at 8.5" x 11" Copies of all written documents Second submittals for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall include: Blueprints - folded 6" x 9" Reduction of plan at 8.5" x 11" Copies of all written documents )lder: ORD ile: APP.FIN City of Southlake, Texas 0 N 24 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-24 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 6/12/92 PROJECT NAME: Plat Revision -Latrobe Addition (Revises Wilkinson) OWNER/APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson 237 Hillview Hurst, Texas 76054 Phone: (817) 267-4421 Fax: ENG/SURVEYOR: Washington & Associates. Inc 500 Grapevine Hwy. Suite 375 Hurst, Texas 76054 Phone: (817) 485-0707 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/21/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Provide a written scale next to the graphic scale. 2. The title block format should be changed to follow the example attached. The zoning may be deleted from the title block. 3. Include the number of lots in the title block. 4. Delete the word "city" from City Secretary in the approval block in the P & Z section. 5. Provide the owner's dedication and notary and surveyors certification per the standard format. 6. Provide the courthouse filing note near the title block. 7. Show the platted lot and blocks within 200' of this property. (i.e. Monticello, Timarron). Show plat record for Timarron. 8. Show and label all existing easements adjacent to this property. 9. Property description must reference deed record in the name of the current owner. (See standard format). 10. Add the following note on the plat: Driveway access for Lots 1 and 3 must be provided by the common drive for Lot 2. Lots 1 and 3 will not be allowed drive access onto White Chapel Road. 11. Show the limits of flood plain. 96-5 City of Southlake, Texas 12. Show the D + U E along the north line as. 15' in width per the previous plat. 13. Show the Tri-County 20' easement per the previous plat. 14. Provide a Preliminary water and sewer plan for this development. i * The front setbacks will change to 35' if the proposed SF20 zoning is approved. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by June 29 , 1992. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x 11" revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment enc. Title block format cc: Terry Wilkinson Washington & Associates � g-b WI KM K- ■ annRrR rw t' 1 a� Y.12 Jr rw yr ,. Y K yr . 7l.•flfr �~ �R � 1 • wwl. �� i41LI Y / . a\� a�: w OV W..1 K-S a my N76.ifP. IW •� P.O.B. f 1 / III I 1 ! >•w I 1 II 1' I 1 ! 1. 1 IS 1. I1 PLAT REVISION w►lkinson Addition .as ■4... .r w. 4.873 ACRZ TRACT ow ./ PL HALL YIDLIN SURVIY ABSTRACT NUM,89R :03= 1. 1L CITY Of SOUTHLAM rARRANr COUNrr. rZW FxfsrlNc ZONING: " PROPOSdD IONINC. R-20 Vlly vI auutl llana, I CAaS PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY (401, 2M CASE NO: ZA 92-24 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 7/17/92 PROJECT NAME: Plat Revision -Latrobe Addition (Revises Wilkinson) OWNER/APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson 237 Hillview Hurst, Texas 76054 Phone: (817) 267-4421 Fax: ENG/SURVEYOR: Washington & Associates, Inc 500 Grapevine Hwy. Suite 375 Hurst, Texas 76054 Phone: (817) 485-0707 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/13/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Property description must reference deed record in the name of the current owner. (See standard format). * The front setbacks will change to 35' if the proposed SF20 zoning is approved. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment enc. Title block format cc: Terry Wilkinson Washington & Associates q 8B-a r C, AM, !gyp d _ a i L �r • 3 e i a�gggyoits�@i Ha l jf 3 € a • t PT fit I s T ill a 1 1 `L^i R all - 1 N, N City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-05 Preliminary Plat/Timarron/Phase III REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Timarron, Phase III, being described as 137.20 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, the Hollingsworth and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, and the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 LOCATION: North and South of East Continental Blvd., approximately 1,000 feet West of South Carroll Avenue and continuing South to Big Bear Creek. OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development BACKGROUND INFO: Phase III proposes 290 residential lots and fourteen (14) common open space areas NO. NOTICES SENT: Sixty-seven (67) RESPONSES: Two (2) written responses within 200' Opposed: Noah B. Pond, 920 S. Carroll Avenue Undecided: Lois E. O'Dair, Lot 5, East Haven Addition P & Z ACTION: March 19, 1992; April 9, 1992; April 23, 1992; May 21, 1992; Approved applicant's request to TABLE and continue the public hearing. June 18, 1992; Approved (6-1) subject to the June 12, 1992 Plat Review Summary, deleting item #1, increasing Street "A" to 60 feet from Streets "J" to "P." COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1992; Approved (4-0) to TABLE until July 21, 1992. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Fourth Plat Review Summary dated July 2, 1992. /fx §- KPG This plat reflects the changes to the minimum lot size for Product Type "C" as approved by the City Council on the development site plan for Phase III. The City Council agreed to 10,500 sq. ft. as the minimum lot size for Product Type "C" with 11,000 sq. ft. as the average. k-1 6 CITY OF SO(T H AKE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 2/07/90 TITLE OF PLAT: Timarron, Phase 3 SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: February 10, 1992 TOTAL, LOTS: ':,q) TOTAL, ACMES: 137.20 ZA qL-0 APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Timarron Land Corporation Same as Applicant ADDRESS:300 East Carpenter Frwy., #1425 Irving, Texas 75062 PHCNE: (214) 791-3333 I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request and address esolved issues. Signed: Date: �-- ******#*** For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount. of $ 3 3 c0 . °= on this the 13S day of �. , 19-il Signed: r✓ U m Title: 'A ' t/ The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100', 1" = 200' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity �— Vicinity Map �- Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of... �— Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner &.subdivider (if different) ✓ Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Standard approval block provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200' ) Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, / street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate V City Limit or E.T.J. Lines Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersections shown with street names ?c-2 Not CAL SITE INFCMTICN 2/07/90 Applic. Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corer, previously filed subdivision corner 6r USGS monument, total acreage. Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. Show existing traveled roadway widths General outline of area embraced by tree cover All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) PROPOSED INFTICN Not ' Included Included N-4 Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) Street names provided not similar to any existing street names R O W dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and .dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above Any proposed zoning labeled as such Quantitative land use schedule provided (No. 483-3.02-C-30) Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc. Approximate flood plain and floodway limits shown. Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) PRELIMINARY EFIGINEE RING PLANS ✓ Preliminary water layout showing all existing and proposed lines adjacent to the property and within the tract ✓ . Preliminary sewer layout Preliminary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3.02-C-33) and No. 482 -ulhl.— Bo.lc—rd cl r J r _ I PL\..I 11 KI<RI \I10% \RIA 400( r \ILL\GE r \ILLAGE I , rllAtiL a L.L VILLAGE \lL4Gi _—_—_l nmucnl�—; li nirJ 1�IG I I H�Sttl CE\TERVILLAGE '�Z --•� -VILLAGE ` VILLAGE VILLAGE Vjj—L.AGE �•n r wnc J � -. T I M A R RO N TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION. INC VILLAGE MASTER PLAN Jnhn \It('wn R,qd 8c - y GOLF COURSE City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-05 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OFIREVIEW: 6/12/92 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Phase III OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Fax: (214) 541-0800 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Drive Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 74247 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/8/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. The subdivision ordinance (483-5.03-I) recommends a maximum of twenty (20) dwelling units on a cul-de-sac. The area east of the open space north of Continental has 48 lots from one point of entry. Staff recommends a street stub east at the northeast corner, through Timarron property, to connect with Carroll Avenue. * Any reverse curves must have tangents meeting the requirements of 483-5.03-F-2. No compound curves are allowed. * No utility easements to serve the interior lots have been shown. Provide all appropriate easements depending on the intentions to provide electric from the front or rear of the lots. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 6/29/92 . All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x 11" revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter & Burgess, Inc. City of Colleyville, with reduction U-5 1 'jtl �t h ! �� ;; f �► � i� ilE; Et 1111 ji 1 E 11►li:i:�►►►I�IIIII1sl �. i` i ;: i (j1 ;j j 1 i,) 1 rril 't ► ►it..01iii::Sit •t �, +r ► ¢i i tE , t,u t i utnntnu,uuuttt ti t ,t 1 { tt t! I , It t, till] i; t funttntfuttrutttr ii1, In IIt 1 IiE i it i ! il �i •, I Et' E �t It 1 ,n,I► NNN, jri i it ii ► iiii' i l l l u 1 1,tt i, I uu„uut tic. 1.. i tat tit tl G, t � tit1r1t1tU ti ii!i�Jt1 111RI1 1i11.ItI I, ! `g itr � 1 i ` =t lie: is ► ;�: All is re i w i ...•.a......... lit tit El � y _ � . __1_ . • - f�'� Jae �' �t • s i ak: y'•s k e t 'Jrl {it �1 � l� a � 1 ' � �� •-JC t N:t{�, ��- r 1111� tt l�ltt j � �• o¢ 1l�t�l=l�i�i t ` 1 1 1 at , 'i t t513 ti (SE ii JRt ills! i E:q ! • s e ilia i� t City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-05 REVIEW NO: FOUR DATE OF REVIEW: 7/2/92 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Phase III OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Fax: (214) 541-0800 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Drive Suite 250 Dallas Texas 74247 P one• (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/29/92 AND WE OFFER THE ,FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-558 1. The subdivision ordinance �483-5.03-I) recommends a maximum of twenty (20) dwelling units on a cul-de-sac. The area east of the open space north of Continental has 48 lots from one point of entry. Staff recommends a street stub east at the northeast corner, through Timarron property, to connect with Carroll Avenue. Street 'P' also has 34 lots (Product 'D') on a cul-de-sac. * Any reverse curves must have tangents meeting the requirements of 483-5.03-F-2. No compound curves are allowed. * No utility easements shown. Provide all intentions to provide lots. to serve the interior lots have been appropriate easements depending on the electric from the front or rear of the * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter & Burgess, Inc. It Im 'll '1 � ► � j I, I , ° ' I � � 1 �' 1 . w ;III !i ! lu, :j 1 E tlil!lulllltnttlltlt is II l !. 1 1 31 ii 1 s' : �� � t � :: x sj:= ��eE t 1 1 '•� ! 1 !a.lilihta:lllalal: c{ , 1 1 ai � (� it � .7.': it I ijll !` J llli ;f � � IUl1111111!!Sl,N1111 if ��, `�1 1 � it rl 1 I I , � � � � � � � • ; 9_:i; 3e�i riii '! i ii�:r�iii:=iiFii:�isi '1 Ill i it 1 Y= !1 I E E E O• S 1 1'�r tr 1 1111 1 1 E 111►till.:l -.YlitlflYla ° E ct 1 il!�i' 11111 g' 4 � 1i1{i{{{ii11I111{111i1 CI aIr:f; r pri qr tl! it qr; Cr t1 qr qq� = � u I I i i;lli4l;ji! 9i4{!p!l � �'• • � n4. I Ijli t11j 1 i t s , 1. 1 I 1 :� it � t ill t 1 lilltlEllla 'qL i lij) i11 � i. ►{ {{1 { � ::j ti 1{t j � ,yu�Ulh� ; g e� - I:l� ���� � EI rl Ili 1 j �ii Il Ili i I EiiiiiiEiii 11 /,� - Ilt• 11: , 11 it (:I I 1 111 11 tlt:' 1 1 1U111{1111 rj � � s i;!1 i;119 ;; fit 4 4 i; Ill ii j i, �aa a...a,..ro..•,. a:oo i,oa. . a,.. �a»�w......,,. 3 t6 ySpli t E 3Y i 'S' i YF i 4 82, g.� $ •' } ' � ��. - �a � as 3 t� ?r`� 'j .L1 I • I :• el t - .„ � I i . �~� • *� � Y a f a. • 't - e 1_� lit �jR Ir 2 t � J � 61 6 �:,,s1 �`' y .°: y rim ..da,.,cur•, _ i - �^a � ' Gl.t„ _ �y � `� �-, ,�1�i 1.. Imo— ..-�•••'� s'.c' ��� _{. st ilk 1 • 1 r �r �_, ail. � • r � � a /'tZ r � � vi ol j' y1 s .� _ •�, � .y a "�,.� 11 ° � 1 T � C° t fib" � � j �a Je•�-,A1 �,in'(��j'��j��r•,` - V • ` a\. / �� 3 Ei lo }- . .� s4 w � - ��''' �r � .: �, ' i � X :ig� t y°tEl't' �•i s: i %I a, •�� a,•r ��1a• it � eaw a. -I. �• tf•6 Y• � 9 Y?„ Iti _ �%�r' {,-< ';��.G � :�'�-.I{•.. ( '•� +. *FFFFyTTTT � � _- 9 � Y� 1 � • �� t rl. . .I:• . 1 a •r a',`S �c'1. ✓ y� 8 � !`5 e� , � a r✓�: '�-a F ;r ,� �, s ,a%. �:yso � tl$s s 9 � -- �• a • r �•'v��e�t� ` _ - \awr'.a.ana �.anw ,�ra.wma. Y3±: - w••.a..w.r. ! , . -•.• �{ca a. awa ar.r.—nro.n nan r • j j .t a m4 • ; : � 0 I y„e ,■:: ..•+r,r . i i � � � ! � i • 9i E t �i E �s;t= �i 7z— City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-06 Preliminary Plat/Timarron Golf Course REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Timarron Golf Course being described as 160.18 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, the Hollingsworth and Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797, the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, and the M. Davenport Survey, Abstract No. 432 LOCATION: North of Big Bear Creek, South of East Continental Blvd., East of Brumlow Avenue and West of Phases I and II of Timarron OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development BACKGROUND INFO,: This Preliminary Plat represents three (3) lots: two (2) golf course lots and one (1) clubhouse lot. NO. NOTICES SENT: Sixty-seven (67) RESPONSES: None within 200' P & Z ACTION: March 19, 1992; April 9, 1992; April 23, 1992; May 21, 1992; Approved applicant's request to TABLE and continue the public hearing. June 18, 1992; Approved (7-0) subject to the June 12, 1992 Plat Review Summary. COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1992; Approved (4-0) to TABLE until July 21, 1992. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Fourth Plat Review Summary dated July 2, 1992. KPG CITY OF SOUIHLMM PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 2/07/90 TITLE OF PLAT: Timarron Golf Course SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: February 10, 1992 CAI, LOTS • 3 TOTAL ACRES: --�(e8$A- 7A9L'06 . APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Timarron Land Corporation ADDRESS: 300 East Carpenter Frwy., #1425 Irving, Texas 75062 PHCNE: (214) 791-3333 Sa►�a as AQp��cQnf I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zo Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request and address olved issues. Signed: Date: For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge re ceipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of S 180 °` on this the •'^' day of �1--_ 19 Z. Signed: +4nj J; , Title: 2 dk[7A*,n� u-4 v— ��':e following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shawn Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. yl�_ Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 1001, 1" = 200' _V"' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of... Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation L� Name & address of record owner &.subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Standard approval block provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') I� Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record ZPlatted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines �- Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property �- Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) l� Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersections shown with street names b -1 brxy*jn Not GENERAL SITE INFaWTICN 2/07/90 ' !,! an Applic. Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage. Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. Show existing traveled roadway widths �— General outline of area embraced by tree cover All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) PROPOSED INFORMATION ✓ Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' / U.E. along the interior of the property line V 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 LX Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) _V-, Street names provided not similar to any existing street names �— R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) I�L Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above Any proposed zoning labeled as such Quantitative land use schedule provided (No. 483-3.02-C-30) �- Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc. Approximate flood plain and floodway limits shown. Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) Not Included Included IV Zi 71 I - 1212,- �. Preliminary water layout showing all existing and proposed lines adjacent to the property and within the tract Preliminary sewer layout Preliminary drainage study by contours in conformance with (3.02-C-33) and No. 482 8D-3 Professional Civil Engineer provided with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-06 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF -.REVIEW: 6/12/92 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Golf Course OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Fax: (214) 541-0800 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Drive Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 74247 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (217) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/8/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. * We find the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous reviews. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 6/29/92 . All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x 11" revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter & Burgess, Inc. City of Colleyville, with reduction b-q go 1� I KY• � �`rm��s, ss0� II� � � �� i F ��- 4 i t s C�,ff • � •/ s I f s d -A 1 -* _I e- . _ t:. ii:iliiiiti�ii:titm �•i •C '�`' E1 � ' � 1 mannn,nnun, ► � � �� � ,� iiinmcbmmm� I I! li !� y�`s "*, • - Lpig 1 i c � C,►[�i/ pq s r II/It1 111 1 ;t1111 ��\4� � � • k //�� � S nunnunouan y�'r itttl: it•tttt i �: � �' o i / Ito t � _ it ,uiuutu L' I I � tt� �� _' �� /• to i ' � •• it � it lfitinniiuiiu : • � � z � � •� � g �,�I � `� Sol � � %���•,�'�•, � ,::+:iSiitiii:tiiiiili:t ....... ....... �........E.......EitE tt �:��-- �� `1 1='�� b •��` ��•' ��wi lffi—r`� ,� 8-D L----�'—�— \ a f,,,,,,,,,sesssfssfsf.f City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY V CASE NO: ZA 92-06 REVIEW NO: FOUR DATE OF;REVIEW: 7/2/92 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Timarron Golf Course OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Timarron Land Corporation Carter & Burgess, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. 7950 Elmbrook Drive Suite 1425 Suite 250 Irving, Texas 75062 Dallas Texas 74247 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 541-0800 Fax: (217) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/29/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS OR NEED �FLURTHERNDED BY THE CLARIFICATION, CITY LSE COUNCIL. CONTACTYOU GREG HAVE LASST QUESTIONS OR 481-5581, EXT. 744. * We find the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous reviews. * Denotes Informational Comment IL N W - .Keiei i • e. eoeo OS�/b��S S � o [ S I � U i' .: 9 �':: � � � _ e 3 _�-�c� •I �! �J7 �� =`LLB �< 17 /'ili'•i'iuiiiiiiil ;t •� � %��� 'v • � .�_ � R 7;� • •\ l���o IIIt11111LII1bUll 1 C iiillluuuuuult ! i l �,!!UI!u nnlh!I,,,,,, ulilull, p,,,,p,, / `•4 S ' a .. �t�t' ?' 1 f,iulii.i:.lii7ii.::::77•iiiuiilii•E1t.711ti � � � y/" it I UII111111111O11!In111i1111t1111111111111ttt1 / `. �! � � � � � • j //✓l. � i� i ' Sit:ittlC7.t!ii:.i:'.t't'...:.Bi.it.li.I:Gi i �� / i 4''• � � _ 1� I 1 Itllllllllllltlll111111111t111111111111111111 %��: ••,e tl r j / � I111 ��• _ � �/ s i uun!n!un!I!Inu,!!.!!�!1!!!!41 it i f iiiii61 11illoilli;ii:l7i:,lls,:l.uui:il 11 1 1 1Q 111111111111111111111111111111111U11111111 gC ::i: i� 1 I1t111111111111i1lIIIIIli111I111i11111111I1 li 1 I �� ;�o �; � �I = �l r; it 87 �lij Ill'• �+ � z � t� ' " �`�� I/ 1 i !ijl 111 �'ii� " �/ x ' j 11ij1 ;i1'j j 1!!11111/!1I,Illllllltll/!11/11111 s illli t'�Ifl l toi7•Inan. 0iai301ai,:7ili7ii ► ! •it. I• ; 111111111111111111111J111111111111 j:!I' Illit I „ltll�tt�tltta.;al'.i:t+W11 ` .saw' �• _ D ill py CYS., Hftlll��1I1l1111111111111IIIII111111111l11 \ C\ './ ? y � YQ •_tll 71• �� � p �� � e.t1•' ! -\ n` \J\ Sal i .N 41 $ \ U / /� ; ` r _ so°s� Y •�'JSCi � �.�"' II \ill I 6 E • a- ,W v : �•iT_ fl � •sue/f l .;• �� /$/�`\ ��I 't t -- to ti. •I /• , i f 1 •► / , ♦ >�t4,"� \ 6 i . ` • . e ' t • o<�,, •.• �` _, ( / \ / ��y�:.\^ Iiilil'llililiilslllllai 1^1 I111l51l171151111!Rl1!!1 I�.............. lasosas:ss!...!1!.!1111 f 4- 4k City of Southiake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-30 Zoning Change Request REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for 1.17 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tract 4A1 LOCATION: 710 S. Kimball Avenue OWNER: Beverly Bratcher APPLICANT: James Phipps dba Paymaster CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: 110-1" Office-1 LAND USE CATEGORY: Transitional Land Use (between commercial and low density BACKGROUND INFO: Beverly Bratcher, owner, is the applicant's sister. Mr. Phipps is a motivational speaker who plans to use this site for his office staff, Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and hold a monthly seminar on Saturday. He has no plans to increase the size of the existing building. He has indicated a willingness to provide adequate, hard -surfaced parking prior to the issuance of a "C.O." NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: Two (2) verbal responses, both opposed: * Mr. and Mrs. Ramsour, 703 S. Kimball Avenue * Mr. and Mrs. Forbus, 595 S. Kimball Avenue One (1) written response, opposed: * Mr. Darrell Faglie, 505 S. Kimball Avenue Three (3) written responses, in favor: * Wayne Lee, Tract 6$ j * Pumpco, Tract 6K1 !� * Jack Petty, 616 S. Kimball Avenue One (1) written response, expressing no opposition from GAIA Technologies, Inc., tenant at 722 S. Kimball Avenue. Please see attached written comments. P & Z ACTION: July 9, 1992; Recommended to DENY (5-2) the 110-1" request. The Commission expressed concern about the impact that the parking needs would have on the surrounding neighborhood, especially to accommodate the once -a -month Saturday seminars. SE- I V Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ZA 92-30, Zoning Change Request July 15, 1992 - Page Two ' The dissenting Commissioners empathized with the neighbors' concern about parking, but they felt that the 110-1" request was compatible as a transitional zone between the industrial to the South and the residential to the North as indicated on the City's Land Use Plan. STAFF COMMENTS: Per Section 46.3, Ordinance No. 480, an affirmative vote of at least three -fourths of all the members of the City Council shall be required to overrule a recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission to deny a proposed change of zoning. Please note that no concept plan is required at the time of zoning application. Having spoken with the applicant's representative, Mr. Keith Bratcher, since the P & Z meeting, it is my understanding that they are preparing an exhibit (not a concept plan) to address the parking issue raised by the Commission. SE-L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING Submittal Date: 6.1151qu Case Number: ZA It-30 A. APPLICANT Fee: $100.00 Receipt No. coliv PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT MY, ,1 MIN : .. L Agent: Address: In 0 , 7h0 V p Telephone: (1781) 917 'fY.S- z,3 B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal Description: OWNER(S) (if different v .58os ;At'& xo� A, -191,9 ( ) Property is unplatted according to the County Deed Records Vol. Page It is shown as Tract of the Survey, Abst. No. , City Tax Records. ( ) A metes and bounds description is attached. ( ) Property is platted and described as: Subdivision Name: Block , Lot(s) Block , Lot(s) ( ) Address of Subject Property: 716) <S Property Location: 11,50-uc Acreage: f J 7 (f:iL� ( ) A typed mailing list of all property owners within 200 feet of the subject property is attached. ( ) A current survey or plat map is attached. ( ) A concept plan shall be submitted for "CS", "SF-30", "SF-20A", "SF-20B", "MF-1", "B-110, "B-2", "HC", "S-P-2" zoning requests. (Required prior to development site plan submittal, but optional at the time of zoning request for "0-1", "0-21', "C-110, "C-210, "C-3", "C-411, "I-1", 11I-2" zoning districts.) ( ) A development site plan shall be submitted with zoning requests in the "MH" and "S-P-1" zoning districts. 9E 3 City of Southlake Application for Change of Zoning Page Two C. i� E. NATURE OF THE REQUEST: Present Zoning: Requested Zoning: Existing Use: )% - P,rop� e� - Reason for Requesting the Change: cam. AUTHORIZATION BY OWNER(S): I (We) hereby authorize the City of Southlake and its employees to enter upon the premises herein above described at all reasonable times for the purpose of erecting, maintaining, or removing signs to notify the public of the pending zoning application and/or public hearing concerning said application. I (We) release the City of Southlake and its employees from liability for any damages which may be incurred to my (our) property in the erecting, maintaining, or removal of said signs. I (We) further understand that it is necessary for me (us) to be present at the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council public hearings. AUTHORIZATION IF AGENT INVOLVED: _ Arm— quest. ,Q Y., , owner of the aforementioned certify that I have given my permission to to act as my agent for this rezoning �-� al. G - / 6 - Z 1-- Signatu of Owner(s) Name Typ d or Printed Date Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TEXAS My Commission expires the day of re t r.Cc, t G 19 5uxvt:Y, ABSTRACT NO. 529, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of a tract described in a deed recorded in Volume 2525, Page 214' Deed Records of said County and being all of a certain tract described as one (1) acre in a deed from Lovie Jo Lancaster, also known as Lovie Jo Lancaster Wilcher, Individually and as Commu- nity Survivor of the Estate of herself and her deceased husband, Clyde D. Lancaster to Erskine McAlpin and wife, Mildred McAlpin, said deed dated February 1, 1968 and recorded in Volume 4517, Page 204, Deed Records of said County and also being all of a tract described as 0.17 acres in a deed from Lovie Jo Lancaster, also (mown as Lovie Jo Lancaster Wilcher, Individually and as CocrmtUty Survivor of the Estate of herself and her deceased husband, Clyde D. Lancaster to Erskine Mc.Alpin, John T. McAlpin, William Lee and Gary G. Lee, said deed dated January 20, 1970 and recorded in Volume 4832, Page 572 Deed Recorded of Tarrant County, Texas, and ....._ _ hpi n R anre nA rt i cn i 1 a rlu-riesCribed . as follows: _ BEGLNND4G at a steel pin in the West line of County Road No. 3114 (Kimball Road) at the Southeast corner of a 2.19 acre tract described in a deed recorded in Volume 4212, Page 141, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said beginning point being the North east corner of said one (1) acre tract; THENCE South along the West line of Kimball Road, passing at 115.39 feet the Southeast corner of said one (1) acre tract, same being the Northeast corner of said 0.17 acre tract and continuing on said course a total distance of 135.39 feet to a steel pin at the Southeast corner of said 0.17 acre tract; -17,M�CE South 88° 35' West, 377.5 feet to a steel pin at the Southwest corner of said 0.17 acre tract; TH—ENCE North, passing at 20.0 feet the Northeast corner of said 0.17 acre tract, sa--e being the Southwest corner of said one (1) acre tract and continuing or, sa=d co= se a total distance of 135.39 feet to the No*-thwest corner of said one (1) acTe tract; ��i. Kra North 7 I 1-� 8S 1 1)5 East, _, 3 i i . 5 feet to the PUCE Or BEGET 'I,IG and continning ir. all 1.1.7 acre c` lard. YE-5 He 73 j�C�ns{ _ - _ 32C , e \ z- Y I` x --yL� -ems m/�s—I�- 1 ` ~ - 332t SB23 ii \ ' �& — - 1f� ti. �'� .r SuavE♦ i!S• �: NORitiwEST at0K%mr I ••—. -0� 2E4: EAST gyp' 1�P 02i .02 oft aUi�S• pK ^` Dia: i ' G�Q- - 63 -3 � 5�6 !'-_2L ! \ I :� - GL a - 2rr •1 0 � �tJ 31 1i u � � �1! r _ D _ SuwEr; • L / BST. N 2 474 , - - . - � �"t�J�It�9 7i3: 11 - r>a_N_oa�L—J ? �/ j S, Si I ���/ SURVgr SeST �iv91529 I vT 'Ev 3-3 2 6:606. r—. 6a• I 104 \ 203c I I uOSG � 33: i 2' 6k ;; iEE DOS I ' r. i P 6E� 613e �cTRl� I EVist-I . ic HALD'SD RE SURVEY t'BST . M91015 /►� RIrA6 1°N n•a O ,� 2 1 It rlq� - -'181� I \ -4 is 12� 1� � 156 is r*� •,�t rlea .�� 2lYaiNa 392 1el I 2 1 'r--si JEd'�OJ /i1 !" _ _ _ !. is 16 1Hp i 94r y' iP'T.�14��5°�'l.' ���� •c j1 .L .93 E 6 332 2+ TRACT LOCATION MAP S:.RvEY aesT N4.91 (� j� s �mye i'�i Y •: / • '' �I ) i-7� i SY, ii, StA iK : I!.• SURVEY ♦95T 4 1019 ,li.c. •♦ �� Y •//T Rs/ • ma too, re!: to? tK _ ` ,y� •G4 �. t/I In 2L te' 21if t LIMA 20 1I z jR 2" 2[� 20� 2R ir. v ' L 1 zY! fir- Z9" 8156z ' ZAZ AG P U D ieze ,/z. ... cl f % SO NORtlferEST PelbfWlY G f1 Y B2: F t►0�Vasr W'' pp jj { �+ III ►► % GORE J R ` ua S I :E 2.z• I if �� I ; CS S.r! AG J I G O S J d c� za i am S / 1 ql.c '0 `% T pPQ-!] Qlszs �i1G ♦ 96 I j ✓a t ) F 20 B — R 2/, Zh�1� ll! � iaAi+T Z. .r. ti� .' ` !' ,♦♦ I I I ♦A � �.W. ' lw�;• ::lltt?-f riml] i11X I ♦ I I (% SURVEY se9T Pis OS .: I z• . n i r:. ae lel I Pt4. �: L� QO _ 2C _ sac -i a; . G el.c. `, • � I EA=— s�w:T • tCtlr.. J�• ({i '1��" A LD C� _ a z •c pac u..c zi' sunvEr q ST N410tJ 1 , ' REE ' I 6 J i_a' f.ONTINEN"iL 'o.VO I - r---,� �• iel. • ,. Ay �11 .r.c Mom- e4�ltL• I. ii )e2 _' Ku.c • SY.c 2t• s+ ISUR �G�T 39—sc� V♦. • '`'l/`✓ I .. --'r `—� EG EXISTING ZONING MAP i�: a mmumm■ P, .............................. ....a.'. :.... .'.•.'.'. • •.•.':.'.... • ••�.' .•.•. .. �.::.. ....................... '. ........... ....:.. ....,.. .............................� �_� • .• • •'•'�' ••'.'.'.. i�.t w XJPlVl !�!..:...... ..•:. ..:.;:::. . ......... ..... :... ....... ........: .... ...... USE's'i>':€€{':€t LAND€>' ...... :. ... ..... ♦♦♦ 3 =.c aC TFi' 6G RA"TM TR 6K .684 AC LEE :I-1" I Tn 6 9.882 ;C I Z �.- co I ~WG) Z PETTY I � MEA z� 4 5 ' 6 0 FAGLIE "SF—lA' FOX "SF —IA" I t HOOD I I "SF —IA" I 1e I 8 9 i � i i f ; 1105- : .967 aC EEN �A oow MEA g 5� Tn 3E_ AC 1 622� g�_9 TRACT The following form may be filled out ana ►nailea to the ciLy or SouLnlaxe Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, 'Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 92-30 T am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about)' the request for the ollowing reasons: `'��-.c� rfccl) i5 :Si17AEti- 1 - £% -'C +.`'�`[t�D <isC•f rC ,eEep i i TNtS t...'aV 1 &C ` -2A r= FtC O,k` N027EAgr a&W AaZ V6 4W10T- c F C.ET ,4 e! S S L'AWg Octes? LIC-117e- 774C-4 A 104R-ACZti i 4.:2E R S!b AI . T47�,- f- (J FA!9 39 C,WS CA'! `r�-iZc SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: 4ZT .5 ZMB9Z.4- 4 VC • cSnr r rl-;Ie-44f< �Moh-e foilowing form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 92-30 I a (in favor of (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the folio ' rea D. SIGNATURE: ,y. �,�,�/� Pumpco Lrresentafrvc ADDRESS: �e iv Co o z Z % gr to The following form may ne rlilea ouL anu maiteu w L-au%.1L. %— ow -11 Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, .Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 92-30 I am in favor of) the request for the Lollo ing reasons: --14 lq- -!� 0 'c- S IGNATURE : G`-/e i " ` `.,- — ADDRESS: 44 -�-- �he following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake W;lanning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 92-30 am (�ng avor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the fo owreasons: SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: -? 6 o I -%-� GAIAtechnologies, inc. July 7, 1992 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake Texas, 76092 Re: ZA 92-30 Dear Sir (Madam): Our firm is the tenant of 722 South Kimble in the plant formerly owned by Entek Corporation. We have submitted a proposal to the property owner, the Resolution Trust Corporation, to purchase the real estate. Recently we received the notice to Interested Property Owners concerning the above zoning amendment application. While we take no specific exception to the proposed amendment, we feel there is an additional matter which must be resolved concerning this tract. On the map which accompanied the notice, the roadway designated as tract 4A4 runs between our property and tract 4A 1 covered by the above notice. Since the roadway is the only accesss to tract 6G--a two acre homesite--the proper handling of this roadway is complicated. A review of the plat map does not clearly indicate the ownership of this roadway. We would like your assistance in determining the ownership of this tract and the responsibilities of the adjacent property owners. U-12 10000 Memorial Drive, Suite 900, Houston, TX 77024 - (713) 688-4774, Fax: (713) 688-4777 Western Region: 3188 North Marks Ave., =1 01, Fresno, California, 93722 - (209) 264-8288 I • If you prefer to meet to discuss this matter, we would be happy to come to your office. SJK/sp 8E• 93 Sincerely vours_ Stephen J, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-74 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 1.17 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, TRACT 4A1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO 110-1" OFFICE-1 DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading 480.74/ORD/kb Page I 7 spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 1.17 acre tract of land out of the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tract 4A1, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From "AG" Agricultural to 110-1" Office District. 480.74/ORD/kb ,v Page 2 !� Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall 480.74/ORD/kb Page 3 v not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: 480J4/ORD/kb Page 4 ` - TO: Curtis E. FROM: Karen P. SUBJECT: ZA 92-29 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 15, 1992 Hawk, City Manager Gandy, Zoning Administrator Specific Use Permit/Noncommercial Radio Antenna REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit request for the installation and use of a noncommercial radio receiving and transmitting antenna less than sixty (601) in height per Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (35). The applicant amended the request to locate the antenna behind the house inside the fenced area by the swimming pool. LOCATION: 141 Harrell, being legally described as Block 3, Lot 3, Cimmarron Acres Addition and being approximately 1.59 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18. OWNER/APPLICANT: John R. Wilder, Jr. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-lA" Single Family-lA Residential LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: July 9, 1992; Approved (6-1) the amended request. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff waived the required concept plan due to the attached exhibit provided by the applicant. k KPG CITY OF SOUTHLAKE I Im APPLICATION FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT Application No.: ZA I) - To be filed with the Zoning Administrator at City Hall, Southlake, Texas in time for proper notice of public hearing to be made and notices to be sent to property owners within 200 feet, fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A fee of $100.00 and a site plan must acccmpany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION (metes and bounds) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE CONSIDERED: Lof 3 Bleck 3 C miyia ►ron A reS PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION: 5 F-1 A REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS AS FOLLOWS: <«fiicn 45. ► (35) Kin ei-c:i-jI rad,c recrivinq /tran'srnit'tin a0m)ae- < �C The above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE EOOF/PERSON FILING REQUEST (must be owner of the property) : DATE: qA-z -c IF 3F 4 5-D 14 17 w- 4Ac 1 '6 E L gel 6Z 4- P311. 0 - ilk, u a J. r- FIG lfY I ; . -03 a Z. :--- 311 ;Sumv Ev ABST mo 524 IN I GAZA 'A \,6A Gaza 7' 79 221 Az -z' 78A. 19 Ac .94 3 3-6A, 92 u A— i 68 a B1 -Z C It, A 2 a Be: -Gf t2, c A 4G., Oil, 3 Z; 2 JOHNSON Ro. 2 2 2 2 2 2 c c c a I-E I !C21CZ! ZC ! C' � C C C Z 014 G c 5 is' 71471. up 2 :3 9 :10: 31, 32 —LL pit 4 Or 16AC 12 SAC ;I E X 2. 20TTAC FAVIE 93 �• . ..... S:�E�AOST'N2 500 t3i —1 C14 cis 20 4c LJ 'At,IE SO•ZAI S U EY +T f#21 8 5 5C c ;2C zc 5.2 a 2, CY Wr w 5AI r CT MG 13 4A. -4: T �G[ :414; 4r, 6 4E G t GA-64. A A . F: ogr40t 5 ZiAj A it c —j! 5r 2 Ac as j 5 Ac -11-4 4KO 14LI IL Alj— !L- L 5.0 Ac. au '54.Ac IiA IA4 L MAC .4K 41. 1.3; 54. wAii 57AC; ZAC� ZAC L I OMAS J.! 7 7 Ln 77.—..,l so 6112 G I GE gBST 14 a]!:: SURVEY L r 48 4c 40 i yS 4 A 4,'9'.-AC 165 Ac :185AC 19 �6AC 1k 74 5AC 'IAC 6C2 —.± 682 " 65 A, Gc 4i 2 Ala, 8 A _7 92 IWO : !g!.L , I f o 6 1-6mi GOP 2 1" ISO& 4, 12AC I k,e I StAus It !• S6 AC GIA, Gr a3A. �E 14A3 ;GA21 SA 4A 4E. 40` 30 3 XEaeR ciry 44 :2 L—A I.; 48 MY 3A IS 19 ac -I Aipr, 1C3 7 At —3c L A C L A Y SURVEY ABST 49346 581A. sc At OLD TRACT LOCATION MAP SMIVISICIOG. C111.1-r MISF MHM of S Illys1o6 SUMMS106: OCOISE Comm —OtICOC . sM1v1s:CW 1ruIO1VEY All SURVEY ABST N9640 o j. Tn.:E:_ 2 AC TR.181=: 2 AC TR.1E1=2 " 1 AC TR.:E. AC _ TR.1E;:. 2 AC J TR.;6;A 2 AC TR.1C ! 6.24 AC t GAUTREAUX "SF-lA" 2 i 3 4 I GRAY LANE 4 "SF-lA" DAVIS "SF-lA" 8 JORDAN OR PRUDENTIAL "C-2" 6 �TRu:aa .165 ! 4a171 T097aAA}' �aaiCa I TR.4A13 j TR.4A14 1 Ac I 64S AC I ` f i f I ITR.4A5' TR.4A2 .861 A� /.314 AC ! ! I � I � c 5 PORTMM i "SF-lA" CASTLMERRY 2 "SF-lA" CC 0 J 'L w 3 a TATE 4 "SF-lA'' 3 SOUTHLAKE BLVD TR 4A3A TA 4A;A ! TR aaaa .06 •C 6 TR.4A3 i TR. 4A1 1.812 AC c A , q im TR. . 19.569;: TR 4E01 t:R.4H .16 @. -_ i TR . 4612 I i 2.36 @ I i -s- s_= .i n p rr. M F' • i! i J9 i:S� W W .rIL ky - �1 i VET Ao leivo Olt ( Sum E air sls',"� 3ie1 .C' rli• sr M� �: I 1� . r R�1 .♦ ,�° --• 1el I i0 •r 7R r � j sc, ' a •- _ I-_JL 1 `w• II � ❑ it f1_,y�LS ,. •GIF --+ T PC I a a 1 a ♦\ r w e•ze ' ,Ac ! - ' �y I �..•<_ r_ J,•A 40 a' ee lIU • • e e / I I L s �c'e : r le 9 10 , it 7 - � �✓ 4 ,� - - E GRS�j �J V' a zee i:2at — .91.1---- -.d ear-7 zo �I y• _— •r 6•c 4 e.a I e�� - - .E ' 2C ♦ � � / 4�� FUwvET •esa rta Soo' '• S ism _ I{ •777 i A y Er DST 02 se ir 40=•t - -"-3 :-U s..r�.� .lses ne- ysu.c IS a•c:s•e �:•14�S�C '-n'.1 - _ -K _ _ _� _� _ z• •- Itt r I 1 &IF _ -- •• 3 • cl -y: I TOPOGRAPHY MAPqA-& COMPACT TMM-SERIES CRANK -UP TOWERS Will handle 18 sq. ft. antennas at 50 mph (433HD will handle 24 sq.) TMM-433SS 33'w/o Mast 11'4" 4 315 toll 18" TMM-433HD 33'w/o Mast 11'4" 4 400 121/2" 20.71s" TMM-541SS 41'w/o Mast 12' 5 430 10" 20-7/81 TX -SERIES FREE-STANDING CRANK -UP TOWERS Will handle 18 sq. ft. antennas at 50 mph winds TX-438 38' 21'6" 2 355 121/2" 15" TX-465 55' 21' 3 670 121/2" is" TX-472 72' 22'8- 4 1040 12%" 21%" TX-472MDP 72' 22'8" 4 1210 12%" 21%" TX-489 89' 23'4" 5 1590 12%" 25s/�" TX-489MDPL 89' 23'4" 5 1800 12%" 25sj�" HDX SERIES HEAVY-DUTY CRANK -UP TOWERS Will handle 30 sq. ft. antennas at 50 mph winds HDX-538 38' 21'6" 2 600 15" 18" \Y' HDX-555 = = 55' 47- - 3 870 15" 21%!' y22'8" HDX-M 72' 4 1420 15" 25%" HDX-572MDP 72' -' 22'8" 4 1600 15" WA" HDX-589MDPL 89' ; 23'8_' 5 2440 15" 30%" TMM-541SS TX 455 HDX-555 10 The factory reserves the right to make changer —or modifications City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 92-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF A NONCOMMERCIAL RADIO RECEIVING AND TRANSMITTING ANTENNA PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 480, SECTION 45.1 (35) FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 3, CIMMARRON ACRES ADDITION, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED AS 141 HARRELL DRIVE, AND INSTALLED PER EXHIBIT "A"; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the installation and use of a noncommercial radio receiving and transmitting antenna has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (35) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such specific use permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the installation and use of a noncommercial radio receiving and transmitting antenna on the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. ui-5 Resolution No. 92-31 Page 2 SECTION 2 This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval of the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas 92-31 AES/ORDAb DAY OF , 1992. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes, Mayor City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: TRA-Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension %�G�9z Kz TRA has approached City staff regarding the long-term financing of the Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension. The original contract was made in 1990 for TRA to issue $12,750,000 in bonds to build the interceptor. Southlake participated in this project 33.64%, along with the cities of Keller, 40.35%, and Ft. Worth, 26.01%. According to the TRA, there are $1,500,000 in excess construction funds from this project. TRA has proposed two options: (1) let TRA hold the excess funds to pay 1993 and a portion of the 1994 debt service, or (2) refund $1,000,000 of the outstanding bonds, transferring $500,000 to debt service, thereby reducing all future debt service requirements. This second option would reduce the total debt service over the life of the issue (20 years) by $1,947,775. There was also discussion of refunding the entire $1,500,000. Provision has been made in our Water and Sewer rate study for the original amount of debt service. For 1993, Southlake's portion is estimated at $405,530. If the entire $1,500,000 bonds are refunded, the amount would be reduced by $33,657 in 1993 to $371,873. If $1,000,000 is refunded, and $500,000 transferred to the debt service fund, the FY1993 savings would be $189,410. Council must decide whether to take the excess funds "up front", over the short term, or use them to reduce the debt service over the life of the bonds. In the interest of a mutual compromise with the other cities, the $1,000,000 refunding and $500,000 transfer to debt service is an acceptable alternative. Northem Region Office DATE: July 2, 1992 FILE: 3152.200 TO: DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Central Regional Wastewater System Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Disposition of Surplus Construction Funds L ii JUL - 6 1992 U We have previously discussed the availability of a currently estimated $1.5 million surplus in the Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension construction fund. The disposition of these funds must be mutually agreed to by the parties involved in the very near future. The attached comparison of various alternatives has previously been provided for your review. In prior discussion with the three Cities, it has been suggested by some that all surplus funds be used to call bonds, and by others that all surplus funds be transferred to the interest and sinking fund to pay debt service (IIIiiw in 1993 and a portion of 1994. Obviously, we cannot do both and must reach a compromise that is agreeable to all parties. It appears that calling bonds in the amount of $1.0 million and transferring $500,000 to the interest and sinking fund may be an acceptable compromise. It is requested that you review this matter and determine if your City is agreeable to calling $1.0 million in bonds and transferring $500,000 to the interest and sinking fund. I am available to discuss this matter with each of you or we can jointly meet to discuss. I will contact you next week to see if a decision has been reached or a meeting is necessary. In the interim, should you have any questions. please give me a call. ROBERT R. STEVENS Acting Manager of Development /idb cc: Warren N. Brewer, Northern Region Manager Wayne K. Hunter, Acting Manager of Operations DISTRIBUTION: Richard Sawdy, City of Fort Worth Allen Bogard, City of Keller dCurtis Hawk, City of Southlake � 4 • Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Debt Service Requirements' Annual Fort Worth Keller Southlake Debt Service 26.01% 40.35% 33.64% $12,750,000� (Current Requirement) FY 93 $ 1,205,500 313,551 486,419 • 405,530 02AQO = /cS 7;- FY 94 1,207,688. 314,120 487,302 406,266 Total Requirement $23,263,748 $10,990,000 (Call $1.5 million) FY 93 $ 1,105,450 287,528 446,049 371,873 FY 94 1,108,550 288,334 447,300 372,916 Total Requirement $20,134,802 $11,490,000 (Call $1.0 million) (Transfer $500,000 to I&S Fund) i $ 1,142,450 - 500,000 FY 93 642,450 167,101 259,229 216,120 FY 94 1,145,550 297,958 462,229 385,363 Total Requirement $21,315,973 $11,740,000 (Call $750,000) (Transfer $750,000 to I&S Fund) $ 1,160,950 - 750,000 FY 93 410,950 106,888 165,818 138,244 FY 94 1,164,050 302,769 469,694 391,587 Total Requirement` $21,917,473 Note: The above costs have not been reduced by interest earnings. /10 a- - 3 City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M EE2 � July 16, 1992 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Terry, Asst. to the City Manager SUBJECT: LEADERSHIP SOUTHLAKE PRESENTATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ Two groups of the 1991-92 Leadership Southlake class will appear to present their advocacy projects undertaken this past year. The groups wish to have the opportunity to make these presentations to the City Council in an effort to gain Council support for the individual projects. Project I examines the establishment of a cable access channel for the City of Southlake. This project would enable the City to offer direct and instantaneous communication services to the people of Southlake. City Council, Planning & Zoning meetings, school functions, or any sort of community event or activity could be televised with this communication tool. Harron Communication, Inc., holder of our current cable service franchise agreement, assisted the group in researching the possibility of bringing this added cable service to Southlake. Project I group participants include Phyllis Adler, Ricky Black, Susan Evans, Susan Hall, and Roseanne Manner. Project II proposes the establishment of a volunteer organization for the City of Southlake. This organization would be called the Southlake Association of Volunteers (SAV). This group proposes setting up a 6 month SAV pilot program at City Hall. SAV would seek to offer citizens of the City the chance to contribute their personal talents and energy to conduct a variety of public service tasks at City Hall. The mechanics of the SAV program would function much like a personnel office to recruit, place, and evaluate volunteers willing to work for the City. Establishing a successful volunteer program has the potential to save the City thousands of dollars that would normally be spent on temporary and part-time employment, or contractual services. Once the pilot program is well established, the hope is to expand SAV to include the C.I.S.D., the Southlake Chamber of Commerce, and other civic groups in Southlake which may be in need of skilled volunteers. Project II group participants include Ronny Nordling, Ros Osborne, Ruth Smith, and Chris Terry. City of Southtake, Texas IN M E M O R A N D U M July 16, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, City Planner SUBJECT: Tree Preservation Ordinance C/Ty M gNq�E Attached you will find a draft copy of a Tree Preservation Ordinance presented at public forum by Sally Hall and other citizens at a previous Council meeting. Please place this item on the Council agenda as a discussion item so that they might give staff further direction with regards to this proposed ordinance. 4'. GL/gh TREEORD.CEH PLANNER UKA L; AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; AND ENACTING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO SUCH PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the tree preservation. ordinance as herein established has been made for the purpose of providing for the orderly, safe and healthful - development within the City of Southlake. And to promote the health, safety and welfare of the community: -By establishing rules and regulations governing the protection of trees and vegetation cover within the City. -By encouraging the protection of healthy trees and vegetation -By providing for the replacement and replanting of trees that are necessa=il_y removed during construction, development or redevelopment either on site or encourage the parks,donation o do=ls.ation of trees removed, to be given to the City, City -By providing regulations to remove dead or diseased trees that imperils life or property or impedes traffic. WHEREAS, the objective of this ordinance is: -To enhance the community ecological or environmental and aesthetic qualities. -To protect and conserve the value of property, whereas the present and future process of development has a negative effect on the ecological balance of an area. As present and future existence of paved surfaces, automobiles, buildings, and other improvements all produce incre�abes in air temperatures, noise and glare. Whereas trees plants and vegetation have the opposite effect through transpiration, the creation of shade and provide a natural buffer to noise and ous surfaces created by development glare. Likewise, impervi generate greater water runoff causing problems from erosion and flooding. WHEREAS, the City Council had determined the importance of preserving and improving the natural environment and maintaining a working ecological balance is of increasing concern in the City of Southlake. The fact that protecting the present trees and vegetation will contribute to the processes of air glareandheat oxygen regeneration, water absorption, and noise, abatement as well as preserve the community's aesthetic qualities. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: ll,tl--z �L z Lul Section 1. Definitions: For the purpose of the administration and enforcement of this Ordinance and unless otherwise stated in this ordinance the following words shall have a meaning as indicated herein; words used in the present sense shall include the future tense; words used in the singular number shall include the plural number, and words used in the plural shall include the singular, and the word "shall" is mandatory not directory. BUILDABLE AREA. That portion of a building site exclusive of the required yard areas on which a structure or building improvements may be erected, and including the actual structure, driveway, parking lot, pool, storage buildings, garage, sidewalks, and other construction as shown on the site plan. COVER AREA. That area which falls within the drip line of any tree. DEVELOPED PROPERTY. Property upon which a building, structure, pavement, or other improvements have been placed. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY. Property upon which no building structure pavement or other improvement have been placed. DRIP LINE. A vertical line extending from the outermost portion of a tree canopy. DESTROY. Any intentional or negligent act which will cause a tree to decline and die within a period of two(2) year's including, but not limited to such damage inflected upon the root system of a tree by the application of toxic substances, the operation of heavy machinery, the change of the natural grade by excavation or filling the covered area or around the trunk of a tree and damages from injury or from fire inflected on trees which result in or permit pest infestation. HISTORIC TREE. A tree which has been determined by the City to be of notable historic interest because of its age; 50 years or older or because of its size or HISTORIC ASSOCIATION aac: has been so designated in the official records of the City. Formula for age: Measure 4-1/2 feet off ground, the circumference of the tree Divide by Pl (3.1417) to get the DBE (Diameter Breast Height) Divide by 0.25 to get years. SPECIMEN TREE. A tree which has been determined to be of high value because of its type, size, age, tolerance to drought, pest r and disease resistance or other professional criteria, and has been so designated in the official records of the City. - + � 1 wT* '1 7 si 3 1 �a t1 Mw TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN. A plan indicating the location size quantity and species of replacement trees or donation of removed trees to City, City Parks, or schools. YARD AREA. Any open space on the same lot with a building, the space being unoccupied, and unobstructed from the ground upward with the exception of trees and other natural vegetation. PUBLIC AGE:7CY. The City, State, Tarrant/Denton County, and/or department boards, agencies, authority or instrumentals of the City, State or Tarrant or Denton Counties. PUBLIC UTILITY. Any publicly, privately, or cooperatively owned line facility or system for producing, transmitting s r oi]stproducts butina communications, power, electricity, light, heat, g water, steam, waste, storm water not connected with highway drainage, and other similar services and commodities including publicly owned fire, police, and traffic signals and lighting systems which directly or indirectly serve the public or any part thereof. Section 2. Applicability. The terms and provisions of this section shall apply to real property as follows: 1. All real property (covered area) upon which any designated specimen tree or historic tree is located. 2. All vacant and all undeveloped property. 3. Ail property to be redeveloped including additions and alterations. 4. The yard areas of all developed property excluding- presently developed and or owner occupied single family residential property, provided however the covered area of a historic and/or specimen tree shall be covered by the terms of this section; provided further that in the event that a nonconforming use is permittgc;ior a special use permit is granted on property zoned resdential, the property shall be subject to the provisions of this section. 5. The public right-of-way, parks, and easements. Section ion Required. Crsociety erson, firm, organization, public agency, public utility directly or indirectly shall out down, destroy, remove, or effectively destroy through damaging, or tree topping specimen tree or historic tree situated on property above (Section 2.) without first obtaining a tree permiermit or pruning permit. ?`' 0920) Section 4. Tree Permit Application. Permits for removal, or replacement, or tapping of trees covered herein shall be obtained by making application on a form prescribed by the City to the Director of Public Works. If a donation of removed trees is planned, submit an application to the Park and Recreation Hoard. The application shall be accompanied by a preliminary plat showing the exact location, size (trunk diameter measured 4-1l2 feet from ground and height) common name of all trees to be removed. The application shall also be accompanied by a written document indicating the reason for removal or replacement or topping of trees. If a developer wishes to donate removed tree(s) to the City or school, please indicate on application. Two copies of a legible site plan drawn to the largest practicable scale shall indicate the following: 1. Location of all existing or proposed structures, parking area, driveways, pools, sidewalks, improvements, and site uses properly dimensioned and referenced to property lines, setbacks, yard requirements, and special relationships (such as a construction line). 2. Location of existing proposed utility easements. 3. Existing and proposed site elevations grades, and major contours, drainage all areas of required cut and fill. 4. The location of trees on the site to be removed or replaced. 5. Tree information required �ove shall eason for arized in legend form on the plan and shall include the proposed removal and tree replacement plan. 6. Application involving developed properties may be based on drawings showing only that portion of the site directly involved, adjacent structures, and landscaping or natural growth incidental thereto. 7. Aerial photographs, at an appropriate sale, may be substituted for a site plan if adequate site"information is supplied on the aerial photographs. 8. if a public utility or public agency wishes to remove, or top, or prune trees, a permit will be required. Section 5. Tree Application Review. No tree or trees shall be removed or topped prior to issuance of a building permit, tree permit or pruning permit unless one of the following conditions exist: 1. The tree is located in a utility or drainage easement or public street right-of-way as recorded on a plat approved by the City Council. In the even that certain trees outside the above -4- areas or trees based partially outside of the easemdnt are requested to be removed to allow the operation of equipment, the applicant shall submit a Plat and Site Plan which indicates the �✓ exact operation area needed. The Director of Public Works may approve selected removal under this condition if the tree(s) unreasonablv restricts the permitted use of the property. 2. The tree is diseased injured, in danger of falling, interferes with utility service, or creates unsafe vision clearance. 3. Tree topping by public agencies or public utilities may be exe;pt from this ordinance where other pruning practices are impractical at the etermination of the _ark and Recreation Board. ti Section 6. Permit Issuance Tree Removal Or Pruning. A. Upon issuance of a building permit the developer shall be allowed to remove trees located in required yard areas, buffers, and open space areas shall be maintained. The buildable area shall include sufficient adjacent area to allow the normal operation of construction ecuipment. B. Upon issuance of a tree permit or pruning permit, the public agency or public utility shall be allowed to top trees if other pruning practices are impractical or remove trees if considered dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare. Section 7. Replacement. In the event that it is necessary to remove trees outside -% e buildable area, the developer, as condition to issuance of a tree removal permit, may be required to replace the tree being removed with comparable trees somewhere within the site. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal, in caliper, the diameter of the tree removed. Said replacement trees shall be a minimum of 3" caliper and 7 feet in height when planted, and shall be selected from the list of approved Replacement Trees maintained by the Park and Recreation Board as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission from the recommendations of the Tarrant and Denton Countv Extension Services and Texas A and M. Section 8. Tree Protection. A. During any construction or land development, the developer shall clearly mark all trees to be maintained and all such trees or groups of trees. The cover area or drip area of all trees to be maintained shall be clearly marked. No fillir_g or grading shall be done in the cover area or drip area of trees to be maintained. If extensive grade lowering (greater than 2 inches), is required a retaining wall should be constructed. If extensive grade raising is required (greater than 4 inches), an aeration scheme shall be provided in order to protect trees being maintained. `�� B. The developer shall not allow the movement of equipment or the storage of equipment, materials, debris or fill to be placed within the drip line of any tree. During the construction stage of development, the developer shall not allow cleaning of equipment or material under the canopy of any tree or group of trees to remain. Neither shall the developer allow the disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to paint, Oil, Solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, etc. under the canopy of any tree or group Of trees to remain. No attachment or wires of any kind, other than those of a protective nature, shall be attached to any tree. (Tree protection information is available compliments of the City of Southlake.) Section 9. Exceptions. A. In the event that any tree shall be determined to be in a hazardous or dangerous condition so as to endanger the public health, welfare, or safety, and require immediate removal without delay, authorization may be given by the Director of Public Works, and the tree may then be removed without obtaining a written permit as herein required. B. During the period of an emergency such as a tornado, storm, flood, or other act of God, the requirements of this Ordinance may be waived as may be deemed necessary by the City Council. C. All licensed plant or tree nurseries shall be exempt from %W the terms and provisions of this section only in relation to those trees planted and growing on the premises of said license, which are so planted and growing `or the sale or intended sale to the general public in the ordinary course Of said licensed business. D. Utility companies franchised by the City may remove trees which endanger public safety and welfare by interfering with utility service, except that where such trees are on owner -occupied properties developed for one -family use, disposal of such trees shall be at the option of the property owner. Section 10. Enforcement. A. The City Manager or an official designated by the City Manager shall be the enforcing official. The enforcing official is charged with the duty of administering the provisions of this Ordinance and securing compliance therewith. In furtherance oz this responsibility, the enforcing official shall: 1. Make such inspections as may be necessary to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Ordinance and to initiate appropriate action to bring about compliance with this Ordinance, if such inspections disclose any instance of noncompliance. %W 2. Investigate thoroughly any complaints of alleged violations of this Ordinance, and indicate clearly in writing as a public record in his office the disposition made of such complaints. -6- 19 Epp 3. Order in writing as set out below the remedy of all conditions or all violations of the Ordinance found to exist in or on any premises. 4. State in the violation order a time limit for compliance herewith as hereinafter set out. s. Request the assistance of the city attorney in taking appropriate legal action upon the failure of the responsible party to comply with such violation order at the time specified therein. B. The enforcing official or his agent is authorized and directed to lawfully enter in and upon all premises at reasonable times to determine their condition insofar as the provisions of the Ordinance are applicable. C. Whenever the enforcing official determines that a violation of this Ordinance exists, he shall take action as follows: I. Give written notice of the violation to the management agent or the owner shown on the most recent tax roll Of the City. A copy of such written notice shall be transmitted to the City Manager. 2. The notice shall include: a. A description of the location of the property involved, either by address or by legal description. b. A statement indicating the nature of the violation_ and reason or reasons why the notice of the violation is being issued. C. A specification of the section or sections of this Ordinance upon which the notice of violation is based. d. A general description of the things that are required to be done in order that"' -the premises comply with the provisions of this Ordinance. e. A statement showing the time within which the work must be accomplished in order to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance which requirement as to time may not be less than ten (10) days nor more than ninety (90) days from the date of such written notice. f. The name or names of the persons upon whom the notice of violation is served. g. A statement advising that upon the failure to comply with the requirements of the notice, the City shall take such enforcement procedures as may be required under this Ordinance in order to secure oompliance. 11'e - g 'r •J ` y.3�7 i h. A statement advising of the -procedures available for review of the action of the enforcing official as *Ar set out in this Ordinance. D. Notice: 1. Service of the written notice required by this Ordinance shall be deemed complete if personally delivered to the person or persons required under the provisions of this Ordinance to be served with such notice, and if the same cannot be personally delivered within the city, then service shall be deemed complete upon sending same by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Last ?mown address of such person or persons and by posting a copy of such notice in a conspicuous place on the premises. 2. The enforcing official shall endorse on the copy of the written notice forwarded to the City Manager the manner of service of the notice or notices as are hereby required. 3. When any written notice of violation shall become an order, either because no petition for review of the decision of the enforcing official has been taken or because such petition for review has been taken and the decision of the enforcing official has not been reversed, then such order shall be executed by the enforcing official. 4. If such order is not complied with within the time specified in the order, then the enforcing official shall use all available means of enforcement in order to secure compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance as well as to secure punishment for its violation. 5. When any notice has been issued and such notice becomes an order within the terms of the Ordinance enforcing official shall cause to be placed in a conspicuous place on the premises a notice which shall read -`'substantially as follows: These premises are in violation of the requirements of the City's Tree Ordinance No. . This notice is to remain as placed here until the requirements of said ordinance have been complied with. It is unlawful to remove this notice until such requirements have been so complied with. Section 11. Parks and Recreation Board To Act As Appeals Board For Violations. There is hereby established an appeals board for Tree Ordinance violations. The Parks and Recreation Board of the City shall serve and perform the duties of such appeals board under the procedures established for that board herein contained: -8- .4 1. If the appeals board sustains the enforcing official, it shall fin & ; a. That the facts as stated in the written notice of violation are correct and that the situation covered by the notice is, in fact, a violation of the Ord_^a_^.ce_; and b. That the remedy stated by the enforcing official in the written notice of violation_ is the minimum remedial action which will bring the premises cited into compliance with this Ordinance. 2. If the appeals board shall modify or withdraw the notice of violation, it shall find the following, as may be applicable to the specific case: a. That the facts as stated in the written notice of violation are not correct and that the situation as covered by the notice is not, in fact, a violation of the Ordinance, or that the procedures required of the enforcing official in this Ordinance have not been complied with; and/or b. That the remedial action required by the enforcing official is not the minimum remedial action necessary to bring this Ordinance (into compliance) and that some other remedial action, to be stated by the appeals board as a part of the record of the case, is the minimum action necessary to secure compliance with this Ordinance. 3. If the person or persons to whom the order is given fails to ccmp'_v within the time allowed, the enforcing official shall promptly proceed with all means of enforcement in order to seek compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance and also in order to punish for any continued violation of this Ordinance. The enforcing official shall likewise place a notice on the premises in the form and manner prescribed in section ..- 4. Request for extension of time: a. In addition to the authority hereinbefore given to the appeals board, such board shall have the authority upon good cause shown therefor in writing to grant an extension of time within which such person may be required to comply with a notice of violation which has been issued by the enforcing official, provided such written request for the extension of time is presented to the board prior to the expiration of time originally stated in the written notice of violation. r !'� !' t � 7 i i i%Aj I b. The enforcing official • shall be furnished immediately with a copy of such written request for an extension and shall immediately file a written report regarding the request which shall be considered by the appeals board at the same time the requested extension shall be considered. C. The authority of the appeals board in hearing requests for extension of time as herein given shall be in each instance limited to either granting or denying the request for such extension, and shall not be considered as an appeal from the terms of the notice of violation, and the appeals board shall not have the authority to modify or vary the terms of the notice of violation except as to the time of performance. d. In granting or denying the request for extension of time, the appeals board shall consider such factors as are appropriate, including the good faith effort to comply, the availability of materials and workmen necessary, and such other factors as the appeals board may deem appropriate and consistent with the intent of this chapter. e. All request for extension of time shall be considered at the next meeting of the appeals board occurring not less than three (3) days after the filling of such request, and the person seeking the extension of time as well as the enforcing official shall be notified of the time and place of such hearing. f. in granting or denying the request, the appeals board shall, in each instance, state its reasons therefor and state the length of time, if it is extended, during which the acts required to be done shall be completed, which time in no instance, may be greater than ninety (90) days after the time period stated in the original notice of'violation. 5. An appeal or request for extension of time properly filed within the time and in the manner as herein provided shall stay all action or enforcement appealed from or sought to be extended until final disposition thereof by the appeals board. Section 12. Status of Appeals Action; Review. A. If the appeals board sustains or modifies the written notice of violation given by the enforcing officer, it shall be deemed an order and action shall be taken by the enforcing official to enforce the same. Any notice of violation served pursuant hereto shall become a final order if no petition in writing for review has been filed by the Ctvaggrieved of party with Southl ke within the ten Park (10 ) days from of commissioners of _ the date of such written notice. 1 C 7N Z' B. Any person or persons or any board, taxpayer, department or bureau of the city government aggrieved by such decision and order of the appeals board may seek review by the board of commissioners of the City of Southlake. Such appeal and review shall be taken within ter_ (10) days from the date of the final order of the board of appeals by filing with the secretary of the board of appeals and with the city clerk a notice of appeal in writing specifying the ground therefore. The official from whom the appeal is taker. shall forthwith transmit to the city clerk for the board of commissioners of the City of Southlake all paper constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. C. The board of commissioners of the City shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give public notice thereof by publication in a newspaper published in the City of Southlake as well as written notice to the parties in interest and all property owners within two hundred (200) feet of the property which is the subject matter of the appeal, such notice to be given at least ten (10) days prior to the date set for such hearing. upon such hearing any person may appear in person or by agent or by attorney. 0. The board of commissioners shall announce its ruling or decision on the appeal within ten (10) days after the date of the hearing and shall notify the aggrieved party of its action in writing. I%W E. Should the aggrieved party be dissatisfied with such ruling, he shall have the right to appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with law and shall file notice of appeal with the board of commissioners of the city within ten (10) days after receipt of notice of its ruling. upon the filing of such suit in a court of competent jurisdiction, the board o= commissioners shall immediately, after notice thereof, forthwith transmit to such court all of the papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. Any order or action thereon appealed from shall be stayed pending the outcome of the trial of the cause in said court of competent jurisdiction. Section 13. Conflict with other Ordinances. Whenever the standards and specifications in this Ordinance conflict with those contained in another ordinance, the most stringent or restrictive provision shall govern. Section 14. Separability. Should any portion of this Ordinance be held for any reason to be invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not be construed to affect any other valid portion thereof, but all valid portions shall remain in full force and effect. //Ar__ /Z— _„ - WFNA - - - _ - -_- ---= - -LVV-I Section 15. Authority Of The City -Clerk.- The city clerk is hereby authorized to promulgate, or to have promulgated and to file for public record and use, rules, regulations, standards and specifications for the construction, installation, design, location and arrangement of landscaped elements, but all such rules, regulations, standards and specifications shall be subject to the approval of the city commission. No such rules, regulations, standards and specifications shall conflict with this Ordinance or any other Ordinances of the City. All such improvements shall be constructed, installed, designed, located and arranged by the developer in accordance with such rules, regulations, standards and specifications. Section 16. Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this Ordinance within the corporate limits of the City shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be fined an amount not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00). Each day that such violation Proseon continues shall be a h 11 ate never offense a. bar to carry pother remedy n or for under this provision relief for violations of the Ordinance. -12-