1996-09-03 CC PacketCity of Southlake, Texas
August 30, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting
September 3, 1996
1. During the work session, we will hopefully answer your questions to agenda items 8C
(Preliminary Plat, Southlake Oaks), 9A (Fee Schedule), 9B (Household Hazardous Waste
Contract), and 10A (Sprint Tower Lease) to the point that these items could be moved to
the Consent Agenda if you are in favor of approving them.
2. Regarding SH114. Yesterday, Thursday, August 29, TxDOT Transportation Commission
met to consider items for the 1997 Unified Development Plan. Discussion on SH114
improvements was rescheduled to September 26. Mayor Stacy has either talked to, or
heard from by another source, all three Transportation Commissioners. All appear to
favor approving something for SH 114.
3. Agenda Item No. 5A. Authorizing the Mayor to execute a renewal agreement with
Tarrant County for Food and Pool Inspection Services. This will renew our existing
contract with Tarrant County. As noted in Bob Whitehead's memo, the only change to
the agreement is that rather than an annual agreement, it will be ongoing with a
cancellation notice provision. Note the contract provision pertains to u lic pool
inspections, not private pool inspections.
FYI. Tarrant County provides a quarterly food inspection report to City Secretary Sandra
LeGrand. You may recall receiving a copy of this report from Sandy.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 2
4. Agenda Item No. 5B. TML Risk Pool Board of Trustees Election. Each City in the TML
Intergovernmental Risk Pool is entitled to vote on the officials nominated to serve on the
Risk Pool's Board of Trustees. The only contested place is Place 4. There are two
candidates from our area: Donald Davis, City Manager of Stephenville, and Paul Isham,
City Attorney for the City of Grand Prairie. Paul is also the listed attorney for the Town
of Westlake.
I know both of these gentlemen and would strongly recommend Don Davis. I have known
Don for 20 years; he is a very capable City Manager, highly knowledgeable of the issues
facing the Risk Pool as they relate to our business. Note his letter attached hereto.
Whoever you choose, let us know during the work session and then mention his name
,,. when the motion is made to approve the consent agenda.
5. Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 96-56. authorizing the Mayor to execute an
Interlocal Agreement with the City of Southlake. City of Colleyville. City of Grapevine.
Town of Trophy Club. GCISD and CISD. This is a renewal of our multi jurisdiction Teen
Court agreement. Note that the renewed interlocal agreement will provide for
participation with the Town of Trophy Club. The cost share for each participating entity
will increase from $6,500 in the current contract to $7,700 in FY96-97. The increase in
cost is due to the increase in case load, from 220 last year to approximately 500 this year,
which results in incidental increase and has necessitated the proposed addition of a part-
time clerical employee. The part-time employee will work approximately 10 hours per
week and will add $4,854 to the total cost. Recall that the Teen Court Coordinator is our
employee, with the other entities contributing their amount to the City of Southlake.
(44" 6. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorization to advertise for FY95-96 and FY96-97 Seal Coat
Micro Surfacing) Annual Programs. Recall that our current budget provides $50,000 to
begin seal coating streets in Cross Timber Hills. The proposed FY96-97 budget provides
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 3
funds to finish the streets in Cross Timber Hills, plus streets in Lake Wood Acres and
Woodland Heights.
As pointed out in the memo from Public Works Director Bob Whitehead, staff advertised
for bids for the FY95-96 projects but no bids were received by the designated time and
date. A bid was received eight (8) minutes later, but was not opened.
In keeping with policy established previously, with the approval of our City Attorney, we
could negotiate a contract with the company which submitted a proposal, that is, the late
bid. (See attached memo from Wayne Olson.) However in checking with the companies
who requested bid specs but did not submit bids, we were told that the project was not bid
(W upon mainly due to its small size.
Staff believes that if we bid the FY95-96 projects with the proposed FY96-97 projects, we
will get a more attractive bid.
Note that this item is on the agenda prior to your final consideration of the proposed
FY95-96 budget. We have heard no reluctance on City Council to fund the proposed
capital improvements listed in the budget. Should City Council not approve the budget
September 3, we will wait until after the September 17 meeting to seek bids; if City
Council decides to delete this project from the approved budget, we simply will not bid
it. We have this item on the agenda at this time so that we can get started A.S.A.P. if
City Council believes the project should proceed.
7. Agenda Item No. 5E. Authorize Mayor to Execute Change Order #1 for Pump Station #1.
Pump Station No. 1 is the 5.0 million gallon ground storage tank at Pearson Lane and FM
1709. When City Council awarded the bid on July 16, 1996 for the construction of the
steel storage tank, we informed City Council of the added cost (for site preparation) to
move the tank to the middle location. At the middle location we begin to encroach into
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 4
the hill. We also discussed the alternative architectural treatments to the tank, but did not
have refined cost estimates.
The change order includes $20,880 for the additional earthwork to relocate the tank, plus
$163,340 for the architectural treatment, for a total change order of $184,220.
The treatment being proposed would be the welded steel facade to the tank, with variations
to the paint color. As pointed out in the memo from Bob Whitehead, this treatment has
the longest life span, and has the second -lowest initial cost.
8. Aizenda Item No. 7A. Left Blank Intentionally.
,. 9. Agenda Item No. 7B. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 665. and 2nd Public Hearing on
Proposed FY96-97 Qj&rating_Budget, There are no changes in the information contained
in your packet. As we discussed in the work session last Tuesday, you can act on the
budget as presented with whatever changes you would like to make.
It is my understanding that you may want to approve the budget as submitted, but with the
following stipulations: (1) to delay expenditures for the items listed on the two reduction
lists until such time as they are brought back to City Council, either in January 1997 or
at mid -year (March 1997); (2) to require City Council approval before the items proposed
for funding through the contract obligations are included, as listed on pages 15-16 of the
Proposed Budget. It is also my understanding that if the expenditure items on the two
deletion lists are not ultimately approved, the funds would go to the undesignated fund
balance.
Q., My comments last meeting about the fact that "you must" approve the budget on
September 3 relate to the requirement to vote on the tax rate on September 3. The public
hearing on the proposed tax increase was August 20. The law requires you to vote on the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 5
tax rate not less than 3 or more than 14 days after the public hearing; the 14th day is
September 3. Also, Section 102.009(a) of the Local Government Code requires that taxes
be levied in accordance with the budget.
Concerning the comments from Terry Frick you received this past week, his reference to
a General Fund "deficit" are not in order. His concerns are apparently similar to those
of Rex Potter. The remarks from Jim Sabonis, with our Financial Advisor, First
Southwest, in his August 27, 1996 memorandum are more to the point. (See attached to
my memo.)
Most importantly, however, I reiterate my comments that the operating budget and future
bond issues are stand-alone items. While we need additional public facilities, we also need
to respond to service requests. The track record of the City's fiscal management in the
last seven (7) years has been progressive but conservative. I believe we can do what we
have planned within the existing tax rate, however, if we find down the road that some
capital improvements will require a small tax rate hike, and it is City Council's desire to
place the issue(s) before them, the voters can decide. Additionally, there may be
alternative funding mechanisms. It is demonstrative of a lack of understanding of the
process to say that the proposed FY96-97 budget "...will severely restrict Southlake's
ability to afford future services and support new debt requirements." I believe we can
convince Terry that he needs to look at it differently. In any case, I appreciate the time
he and others on the committee have taken.
Agenda Item No 7C 2nd Reading Ordinance No 664 Tax Levy Ordinance There are
no changes in the FY1996-97 Tax Levy Ordinance, as presented at first reading.
Agenda Item No 7D 2nd Reading Ordinance No 480-210 ZA 96-91 Rezoning and
Concept Plan for a Retail Center. Parker's Corner located on the southwest corner of
FM1709 and FM1938. There have been no changes since City Council approval of the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
(am., Page 6
first reading. There was not a revised concept plan submitted so the reduced plan and
associated review in your packet are the same as previously considered. The same
modifications need to be included in the motion if that is the City Council's intent.
12. Agenda Item No. 7E. ZA 96-88, Site Plan for Wendy's. Parker's Corner. The applicant
has submitted revised elevations which more closely comply with the articulation
requirements of the corridor study although there are still some deficiencies as noted in
the staff review summary. If you have any questions regarding the articulation, feel free
to contact Dennis Killough, Planner I, at ext. 787.
13. Agenda Item No. 7F. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-209. ZA 96-87. Rezoning. 585
N. Peytonville Ave. Current zoning is AG with a requested zoning of SF-1A. There have
(W been no changes in this request since City Council approval of the first reading.
14. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 96-103. Revised Site Plan. Brazos Electric Power Coo rative
Substation Site. located on East T.W. King Road approximately 1700' north of Kirkwood
Drive. This is the request that PrimeCo discussed with City Council several weeks ago.
They are adding an antenna to the existing tower and have added a control cabinet on the
existing Brazos site. There are several comments in the staff review summary for which
the applicant would like relief, mostly due to the existing nature of the site. We do need
to point out that the staff review has changed with regard to required landscaping and
bufferyards. The relevant ordinances address additions to existing developments. The
proposed additions do not exceed the threshold for requiring the landscape or bufferyards,
therefore these comments were eliminated from the review. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval 6-1, deleting the items as noted in the Staff Report.
(40., Recall that we are in the process of revising our zoning ordinance to allow this type of use
in any zoning category with a SUP. We are several weeks away from P&Z action on the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 7
suggested changes, and our current rules allow City Council action on the site plan. Thus
we would like to proceed in this case. This requires a public hearing since it involves a
site plan revision in a PUD.
15. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 96-107 Revised Site Plan Christian Men's Network
Ravenaux Village. There are no unresolved issues with this request. They are downsizing
their building from 14,000 s.f. to 7,500 s.f. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval 7-0 subject to the staff review summary. If you have any
questions feel free to contact Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy at ext 743.
16. Agenda Item No. 8A. lst_Readine. Ordinance No. 480-208. ZA 96-85. RezoninLy and
Concept Plan for Stone Bridge Park on West Southlake Blvd. Current zoning is AG with
a requested zoning of C-3. This request was amended by the applicant at the P&Z meeting
on August 15. The amended request is for SP-2 zoning for the entire site with 0-1 uses
on the rear of the site and C-2 uses on the front properties. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval 6-0. City Council approved tabling of this item at
a previous meeting to allow the applicant to submit revised plans. The plans in your
packet are the revised plans and the staff review summary is based on these plans. There
are no unresolved technical issues regarding this application other than the items
mentioned in the review summary. If you have any questions regarding this item, feel free
to contact Greg Last at ext. 750 or Dennis Killough at ext 787.
17. Agenda Item No. 8B. This item is left blank. It was originally the Rezoning and Concept
Plan for Southlake Garden Offices located on W. Southlake Blvd. Current zoningis s AG
with a requested zoning of O-1. The applicants this afternoon withdrew their request.
You may have heard that there were a number of technical issues with the request. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial 7-0 based largely on the fact that
they did not feel the use was appropriate here, and that residential was more suited to this
area.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 8
18. Agenda Item No 8C ZA 96-89 Preliminary Plat for Block 1 Lot 1 1709 Southlake
Oaks Addition. Located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Shady Oaks and W .
Southlake Blvd. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 subject to the staff review summary.
Recall that the site plan was approved (6-1, with Councilmember Muller dissenting) by
City Council on 6/18/96, permitting driveway access to Shady Oaks and making
allowances for driveways and the rear yard setback. Since there are no changes and P&Z
recommended approval 7-0, City Council could move this item to consent agenda unless
Councilmember Muller still objects.
19. Agenda Item No. 8D. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-215. ZA 96-104, Rezoning 1.57
acres located on N. White Chapel approximately 530' north of Bob Jones Road. Current
zoning is AG with a requested zoning of SF-1A. There are no unresolved issues regarding
this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.
20. Agenda Item No. 8E. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-216. ZA 96-105. Rezoning for
approximately 10.5 acres located on the northwest corner of Bob Jones Road and N. White
Chapel Blvd. Current zoning is AG with a requested zoning of RE. There are no
unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval 7-0.
21. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 96-106. Preliminary Plat for Block 1. Lots 1 & 2 Reeder Place.
approximately 12.1097 acres located on the northwest corner of Bob Jones Road and N.
White Cha lne Blvd. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.
22. Agenda Item No 9A Resolution No 96-57 Amending the Fee Schedule The resolution
lists all fees charged which have not been otherwise established by ordinance. The fees
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 9
which have been recommended to increase, or which have otherwise been added, have
been highlighted.
Note the comments from Finance Director Lou Ann Heath concerning the perimeter street
fees, and the memo from Parks and Recreation Director Kim Lenoir concerning the fees
recommended by the Park and Recreation Board.
Also, we inadvertently left off the schedule two new Community Development Activity
fees requested from Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy and Community Development
Director Greg Last: #31. Zoning Administrator Verification Letter - $25.00; #32.
Zoning Administrator Opinion/Interpretation Letter - $100.00. Karen receives requests
from individuals (usually realtors, builders, developers) for written opinions or
interpretations of the zoning ordinance. Both of these take time, the latter considerably
more so. These are not the type of requests where a resident calls in asking a question
where all Karen has to do is look at a map or read over the phone a section of an
ordinance. We believe these two fees would limit the requests for written information
from those (realtors, etc.) who want Karen to do their research. There are maps available
for inspection at City Hall, as well as all of our ordinances. Tuesday we will give you a
substitute page 9A-7 with the above noted additions.
Again, if City Council has any questions with or changes in the Fee Schedule, if we can
note these in the work session we can add this item to the Consent Agenda.
23. Agenda Item No. 9B. Resolution No. 96-55. Household Hazardous Waste Contract. Note
the memo from Assistant to the City Manager Kevin Hugman concerning the requests
from City Council. This is an item you either decide to do or not do; there is no room for
QW, negotiation. Following the work session, should you wish to approve it. you could move
the item to the Consent Agenda. Should you decide not to approve it, leave the item
where it is and vote to deny. If you deny this item, we could do some research and try
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 10
and find places where the residents can go to dispose of these types of waste products for
a fee.
Note we have again included the letters from city attorneys Wayne Olson and Mary Drake
regarding this issue; they follow my memo.
24. Agenda Item No. 10A. Authorizing the Mayor to accept the amendment to the agreement
with Sprint Spectrum L.P. on the Bicentennial Ground Tower Lease. The agreement
contains the language Councilmember Harris has agreed to with Steve Portnoy, attorney
for Sprint. Note the preposition "of" was inadvertently omitted from the text under
8C(IV), both as indicated on Bob Whitehead's cover memo and on the agreement itself
(pg. 10A-6). We will have the corrected copy ready Tuesday.
Again, if this agreement is satisfactory following work session, it can be added to the
Consent Agenda.
25. Agenda Item No. 10B. Reconsideration of ZA 96-86. Site Plan for Rockenbaugh
Elementary. The Architects representing the school have asked for reconsideration of this
item due to comments they received from their transportation consultant. They are
concerned about the final geometry of the northernmost drive as recommended by the City
Council at the previous meeting. They would like the opportunity to present their
concerns and request that the original drive geometry as submitted be approved. If you
have any questions regarding this request, feel free to contact Greg Last at ext. 750.
FYI. concerning_ Rockenbaugh School. As you know the school construction is underway
prior to Byron Nelson Parkway's completion. They need temporary power, but the lines
Qw
cannot be brought in until the street is in. We have granted TU Electric the right to bring
in temporary poles across our property, with the understanding that they will stay away
from the trees. The poles will be gone in about two months.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 11
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
26. Cimmarron Acres Ground Storage Projects: There are still concerns with some of the
residents in Cimmarron Acres regarding our tanks and the replatting of the property. We
would like to discuss recent activities regarding this during the executive session next
Tuesday. There are some considerations for which we need your direction prior to
proceeding with the replatting. This will not hold up construction.
27. Thoroughfare Plan Update: The P&Z Commission held a work session on 8/29/96
regarding the update of the Thoroughfare plan. We were unable to include any summary
of the proceedings as of this packet, but we will update you next Tuesday if you would
like. Please feel free to contact Tom Elgin at ext. 753 if you have questions on the MTP
update.
28. Bob Jones Park Master Planning Efforts Continue - The Park Board continued its
consideration of a conceptual master plan for Bob Jones Park at a special workshop held
on August 22. The plan proposes a variety of uses on the 130+ acres of property
currently being acquired by the City in the West Beach Addition. It also shows use of
Corps of Engineers property and potential future acquisition. It is intended to guide the
development of the park for the next twenty (20) years.
A number of issues have arisen during the master planning process. Most notably,
residents of SPIN Neighborhood #1 have expressed concern over the proposed uses on the
property adjacent to Bob Jones Road, and have requested that the Park Board revise the
concept plan to move proposed athletic fields to other sites within the park and to provide
a large buffer between the park and residential uses in the area. SPIN Neighborhood #1
has been active in the development of the plan, working with the Park Board throughout
the process and will most likely continue to provide their input as the plan moves through
the approval process. Some in the area, however, want n2 development of substance in
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 12
the park, as evidenced by the attached letters from Peter Landesberg, which he reportedly
is bulk mailing, the unsigned memo to the Park Board from (apparently) SPIN
Neighborhood #1, and the letter to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department from three
residents of the area requesting that the grant application be delayed. As usual in these
kind of situations, facts are distorted by the hyperbole.
One of our concerns is the desperate need for soccer fields. The Grapevine/Southlake
Soccer Association has told staff that their numbers continue to rise dramatically, and they
must have fields soon. They have also attended the meetings.
Another issue is related to proposed trails within the park. The City's consultant, in
conjunction with the Park Board and city staff, has sought to include trails for a variety
Qe of users. The plan includes the improvement of the existing equestrian trails, and the
construction of hike and bike, as well as nature trails. The issue is the proximity of the
hike/bike trails to the equestrian trails, and the number of "crossovers" included.
The plan currently shows four areas where the different trails would cross. This will
likely be revised with the next iteration of the plan -- at this point, the Park Board is
focusing on the concept, not on the design of the trails. The specifics of the trails will be
worked out during the design phase, prior to construction. During that process, all user
groups will be involved in assisting with the design. The position of the Park Board and
city staff is that trails for a variety of users must be included in the concept plan, but will
defer detailed decisions about routing as discussed above. While the concept plan will
guide phasing for park construction, it is still too early to tackle these issues. Much more
involvement with user groups will be needed to make these decisions.
Q., Equestrians have taken a very strong stand on this issue — letters have been written, public
meetings have become heated, lawyers have been contacted. The Park Board, staff, and
consultants have expressed willingness to compromise on this issue by modifying the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 13
routes of some of the trails to provide greater distance between the trails. However, many
of the equestrians continue to insist that it is inappropriate to have the two trails anywhere
near one another. When asked how far apart the trails need to be, one equestrian is
reported to have said "miles." Today I spoke with Patti Smith, one of the spokespersons
for several equestrian groups. She told me that she believes the equestrians can be
satisfied as long as they are included in the planning process and their legitimate needs are
accommodated. This to her does not mean the exclusion of other trails. There is hope!!
Two SPIN meetings have been scheduled to allow the public -at -large to review the plans.
These meetings are scheduled for September 24, at 7:00 p.m. at Bicentennial Park and
October 2, at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall.
,. 29. SPIN Retreat & Other SPIN Meetings - SPIN will hold it annual retreat on Saturday,
September 14 from 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Solana Education Center. The retreat
will provide an opportunity for SPIN representatives to 1) learn more about the City and
its operations, and 2) receive training on leadership skills. The format of this year's
retreat will be somewhat different than in years past due to the Standing Committee's
desire to spend more time focusing on leadership skill development. The retreat is, of
course, open to anyone who would like to attend.
SPIN Neighborhoods #9, 11, 12, 13, and 14 will jointly host a meeting on September 11
to discuss the proposed development of an assisted living center on the corner of FM 1709
and North Peytonville. The Standing Committee will hold its regular meeting on
Thursday, September 26.
Note also the attached memo from Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton regarding the
,, process for selection of SPIN representatives.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 14
30. Complaints concerning ballfield at 1208 Timber Court - We have again been receiving
complaints from the Scenic Drive neighborhood concerning the ballfield use on Vicki
Johnson's property. You will recall that Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, wrote Vicki
Johnson on June 21, 1996, to inform her that the organized use of the practice ballfield is
prohibited. The use was voluntarily discontinued by the Johnsons, but it has apparently
begun again. Neighbors are again complaining of a lack of privacy, kids urinating on
residents' property, parking issues, general nuisance, and increased liability on the part
of the residents. Yesterday, one resident on Scenic Drive came by to see me on this issue,
and another on Timber Court called me. They want it resolved. Several have spoken to
other staff.
Yesterday I spoke with Vicki and told her that I will be writing her a letter stating the
City's position and that a copy of the petition from her neighbors will be attached. I will
try to mediate the situation between the Johnson's and their neighbors, but since she is a
member of the Park Board, she must comply with our ordinances if a solution cannot be
worked out.
31. Leadership Southlake - This year's Leadership Southlake class, sponsored by the Chamber
of Commerce, is getting ready to begin on Tuesday, September 10 with seventeen (17)
registrants. A tour of the city will be followed by a reception from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. at
Bicentennial Park Community Center. Please come by if you are available.
Included in the Leadership Southlake classes are two sessions on Local Government. The
first session is scheduled for Tuesday, September 24 and will include an introduction by
the Mayor and a briefing on the responsibilities of the City Council by council members
Evans and Harris. The second session is scheduled for Tuesday, November 12 and will
(40., begin with an introduction by Mayor pro tem Evans.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 15
32. Internet Project - As a result of increasing resident interest in Internet and the popularity
of this communication medium, we are in the process of developing an Internet homepage
for the City. We have formed an ad -hoc committee of several interested citizens, staff
members and our computer consultant, to design and implement this feature. We are
going by the "crawl, walk, run" philosophy in that we want to develop a presence on the
Internet that will initially be fairly simple, but will (1) allow citizens access to City
information in a graphically pleasing, but easy to use format; and (2) allow key staff
access to technical and professional information available on Internet. As we continually
upgrade our homepage, we hope to also provide interactive services in the future (e.g.,
registration for parks and recreation activities, on-line complaint forms, etc.).
An integral part of our long-range Internet plans is the ability to network and upgrade our
current computer configuration in city hall, the administration building, parks, and the
public works facility. These are funds which were requested as part of the five-year
Contractual Obligations. If you have any questions about our Internet plans, please feel
free to call Kevin Hugman, at ext 710.
33. Update on Timarron Trial Grout Injection Program - Weather permitting, next
Wednesday, September 4, the contractor will begin excavation of Creekway Bend Drive
to determine the success or failure of the slurry grout injection program. The street will
be impassable while excavation is being done, but will be reopened each evening. The
work is expected to take about three days. Ron Harper, City Engineer, is sending a letter
to the residents to inform them of the work.
34. Update on Lyfor4i�ropgM and PIMA Project (Food Lion) - Advertisements regarding the
sale and/or exchange of property were placed in the Friday and Sunday editions of the Fort
Worth Star Telegram, the City's official newspaper. We anticipate bringing you a
recommendation on this issue at the September 17 City Council meeting.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
Page 16
35. The 40th Birthday Planning Committee met on August 22 and outlined a year -long
program to celebrate Southlake's 40th birthday. The program includes four special events:
birthday party, September 29, 1996; Christmas party, December 1996; fair, June 1997;
and a formal dinner, September 1997. Other activities that will take place throughout the
birthday year include: a logo contest with high school art classes, commemorative poster,
special edition newsletter, novelty items, historical articles placed in newspapers, and a
Southlake history book. The next planning meeting is Wednesday, September 4, 6:30
p.m. at the Lodge.
36. Library Committee Meeting. At their last meeting the Library Committee appointed
Cynda Mast and Karen Apple co-chairs, and Diane Lacina secretary. The next meeting
of the committee has been scheduled for September 18 at 7:00 p.m. and will be held at
Bicentennial Park in the White Chapel room. A copy of their minutes for the August 21
meeting, prepared by secretary Diane Lacina, are attached to my memo.
Also attached is a five -page Executive Summary of the Tri-City Library Project prepared
by Richard Waters of Providence.
37. REMINDER. Please contact Sandy LeGrand if you plan to attend any of the following
functions.
❖ Southlake Chamber Stake Out (Casino Night)
September 21, 1996, 7:30 p.m.
Marriott Solana
4- Texas Municipal League (TML) Annual Conference
November 13-16
Corpus Christi
+ National League of Cities (NLC) Conference
December 7-10, 1996
San Antonio
7
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
September 3, 1996 Meeting
(aw, Page 17
Copy of City & County Financial Management articles regarding (1) Local
Sales Tax Guide -Update 1996 pp. 1-9; and (2) Districts form to control
crime, pp. 25-27.
-+ Water Usage Update
Calendar of upcoming meetings and events
39. Concerning the grant application for the Cottenbelt trail., We have received telephone
notification that this grant was approved. The trail on FM1709 was apparently not
approved. We should receive written notification shortly. The grant application at Bob
Jones Park is from another funding source and is not expected to be considered until
January.
• • • . ____• �� . .. . rWe Tomans IF M.
City of Stephenville
�a<M�
354 North Bellmap
Stephenville, Teas 76401-3499
Mr. Curtis Hawk
City Manager
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Curtis:
DONALD B. DAVIS
City Administrator
August 20, 1996
Office:817/965-7887
Pax No.: 817/%5-6495
I am a candidate for Place 4 on the Board of Trustees of the TML Intergovernmental
Risk Pool, and I need your help. First, I would like to have your vote. Secondly, I would
appreciate your recommending me to the other city managers or other entities within your
region who are members of the Risk Pool.
As you know, I have over 25 years of municipal experience. I have served in all of
the regions of the state, except south Texas. Because of these two factors, I feel like I can
well represent you and your city on the board. I am also fully conscience of the fact that the
TML Risk Pool has one reason for being, and that is to serve its member cities.
Thank you for your support and help in this effort. If you have not yet received your
ballot, it should arrive soon.
Sincerely,
Donald B. Davis
DBD:cls
L
M
31
FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS
3100 [SANK ONE TOWER
500 THROCK.�IORTON STREET
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-3821
TELEPHONE (817) 332-2580
(800) 318-3400
FAX (817) 3324740
WAYNE K. OLSON
August 16, 1996
Mr. Bob Whit ead
Director of,,Public Works
City of uthlake
172 . 1709
S thlake. Texas 76092
RE: Competitive Bidding for Microsurfacing Project
Dear Bob:
i 1
I I1
019M6 '+
OFFICE OF CITY
MANAGER
G
I could not find a previous opinion that you indicated I had drafted for Curtis Hawk,
so I am writing you a separate opinion on this matter. You stated that the city had
advertised for bids for the-Microsurfacing (seal coating) of certain public streets in the city.
The bids were proposed to be opened at 10:00 a.m. yesterday. However, as of 10:00 a.m.,
the city had received no bids. A few minutes after 10:00 a.m. the city did receive a bid
which as of yet is unopened. You asked first whether the city could open the late bid and
second whether the city could enter into a contract with this bidder or another nonbidd ng
party to perform the microsurfacing work. My answer to both questions is yes.
As we discussed, because the bid was submitted to the city after the required 10:00
a.m. deadline, it may not be accepted as a compliant bid. A late bid is the same as no bid,
and since the city received no other bids, the contract may not be awarded pursuant to bids.
The city may, of course, rebid the project at any time and award a contract to the lowest
responsible bidder who complies with the rebid. In the alternative, it is my opinion that the
city has the right to negotiate a contract with an appropriate entity as long as the contract
meets the specifications of the original contract that was put out for bids.
f-\files\slake\letten\whitehea.005
Mr. Bob Whitehead
August 16, 1996
Page 2
Section 252.021 of the Local Government Code provides that before a municipality
may enter into a contract that requires an expenditure of more than $15,000.00, the
municipality must "comply with the procedure prescribed by [Chapter 252] for competitive
sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposals". Because the contract which you proposed
to let involves public works construction, separate bidding rules apply to the contract. These
rules are set forth in Subchapter B of Chapter 271 of the Local Government Code. Section
271.024 requires that "the bidding on the contract must be accomplished in the manner
provided by this subchapter". Chapter 271 thereafter sets forth slightly different advertising
and notice requirements for the bidding of a public works contract.
Section 271.027 provides:
"§ 271.027. Award of Contract
(a) The governmental entity is entitled to reject any and all bids.
(b) The contract must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, but
the contract may not be awarded to a bidder who is not the lowest bidder
unless before the award each lower bidder is given notice of the proposed
award and is given an opportunity to appear before the governing body of the
governmental entity or the designated representative of the governing body
and present evidence concerning the bidder's responsibility."
Section 271.028 provides that a contract awarded in violation of this subchapter is void.
There are two primary purposes of the competitive bidding requirements of Chapters
252 and 271. First, the bidding process ensures that city officials will not cut an "under the
table" deal with a preferred contractor. Such a practice is against public policy and the
bidding requirements assure that no sweetheart deals will be made and that all responsible
bidders will have an equal opportunity to be awarded public works projects as long as they
meet the specifications for the project. This ensures fairness and openness to the public.
The second purpose behind the competitive bidding statutes is to assure that the city
pays a reasonable price for products, services or projects which it lets. Theoretically, the
competitive bidding process brings out the best available price. This is not always the case,
however. Therefore, where all of the bids come in too high, the city is entitled to reject all
bids. Where this occurs, it is my opinion that the city may not then negotiate with the
f: \files\slake\let tets\whitehea.005
L
Mr. Bob Whitehead
August 16, 1996
Page 3
individual bidders to obtain a lower price because this defeats the competitive bidding
process. However, where the city receives no bids at all on a particular project, I feel that
the city has complied with the intent of the competitive bidding statute and is then free to
attempt to purchase the goods or services for a reasonable price, after negotiation with a
proposed contractor.
In the situation you described, you received only one bid which was presented late.
This bid must be rejected, and therefore, it should be treated as no bid at all. Under these
circumstances, it is my opinion that you may attempt to negotiate a coiiLxact or, your own
with any responsible person or entity who is capable of performing the contract under the
terms, conditions and specifications that were originally bid. This would also include
negotiating with the late bidder. I would strongly recommend that you document the
reasonableness of the contract price that you finally negotiate because you are under a
fiduciary duty to assure a fair price is paid by the city. Let me also emphasize that you may
not negotiate a contract meeting different specifications than were originally bid. If the
specifications change, you must rebid the contract under the assumption that other
responsible persons would have bid the contract under the new specifications.
(4W
Let me also counsel you that it would be unacceptable for the city to enter into a
contract with a particular contract that offers to beat any price that the city receives through
competitive bidding. However, where the city has received no bids as you described, I do
not believe that the city is prohibited from moving forward on a necessary project. Let me
The Texas Attorney General would probably disagree with my opinion. In 1991, Dan
Morales issued Opinion No. DM-4 interpreting the county competitive bidding statute. In
that opinion, the Attorney General determined that a county must readvertise for bids on
a contract for which no bids were received because the County Purchasing Act imposes no
limit on the number of times a county may be required to advertise for bids in such
instances. Presumably, it is the Attorney General's opinion that if no bids are received, no
contract can ever be awarded and the project can never be completed. This opinion could
lead to some atrocious results under certain circumstances, and I would question its
applicability to municipalities until a similar ruling has been made by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
Finally, you asked whether the city may open the late bid which it received. Because
the bid was submitted late and therefore does not qualify with the bid requirements, it is an
unacceptable bid and must be rejected. However, unless city bidding policy requires the city
to return the bid unopened, it is my opinion that the city has the right to open the bid for
f:\files\slake\letters\whitehea.005
Mr. Bob Whitehead
August 16, 1996
Page 4
informational purposes only. Again, the contract may not be awarded pursuant to the late
bid, because this bid is noncompliant.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please let me know.
WKO/wrt
cc Mr. Curtis Hawk
City of Southlake
1725 E. 1709
Southlake, Texas 76092
f.\files\slake\letters\whitehea.o05
IN
Very truly yours,
,/3 /,-- a, '
Wayne K. Olson
::FIRST SOUTHWEST COMPANY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Curtis Hawk
Lou Ann Heath
City of Southlake
FROM: Jim Sabonis 5
First Southwe Company
DATE: August 27, 1996
RE: Comments regarding Terence F. Frick's letter to the Mayor and City Council
dated August 22, 1996
Per your request, I have reviewed Mr. Frick's letter and carefully assessed his comments based on
the City's historical and current financial situation, and proposed general obligation capital
improvement program. The two main reference documents used to analyze comments were: (1)
the City of Southlake's most recent Moody's Municipal Credit Report and (2) the recently
completed City of Southlake, Texas General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Analysis and
Implementation Plan dated August 21, 1996. Based on my review and analysis of Mr. Frick's
comments, I strongly disagree with his two main statements: (1) the proposed budget, will
severely restrict Southlake's ability to afford future services and support new debt requirements
and (2) that Certificates of Obligation will be used to support a General Fund deficit. My analysis
and experience indicates the following:
�k The City of Southlake has Adequate Debt Capacity to Support the Proposed General
Obligation Debt Program
Currently, the City of Southlake's General Obligation Debt is rated "A" by Moody's Investor
Services, Inc. (Moody's) and `A'by Standard and Poor's Company (S&P). An "A" is an upper -
medium grade investment grade and is an outstanding rating for Southlake based on its size and
state of development. According to S&P, Debt rated "A" has a strong capacity to pay interest
and repay principal although it is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in
circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories ("AAA" and "AA").
Most importantly, both Moody's and S&P indicated that if the City continues its strong economic
growth and conservative financial management, even higher future rating are potentially attainable
1
FIRST SOi1TH 0T COMPANY
for the City. The key point to note is that both Moody's and S&P are aware of the City's
proposed capital investment program and confirmed the "A" rating based on the assumption that
the City fully implements the program as planned.
Recently, as part of the ongoing financial advisory process, I updated the analysis of the City's
capital improvement program resulting in the City of Southlake, Texas General Obligation Capital
Improvement Plan Analysis and Implementation Plan dated August 21, 1996. The analysis is
based on the following assumptions:
1) Taxable assessed value as provided by City Staff and confirmed by the Municipal
Complex Finance Subcommittee,
2) Capital required and timing of funding as provided by City Staff and confirmed by
the Municipal Finance Subcommittee,
3) Conservative estimates of interest rates and cost of issuance.
The results of the analysis indicates that the City has the capacity to fully fund its proposed capital
improvement program and if strategically desired, though creative structuring, maintain the
proposed 1996/97 interest and sinking fund tax rate for entire planning period.
* Certificates of Obligation and Anticipation Notes are the Appropriate Methods to Finance
Equipment Capital Acquisition
.. Certificates of obligation and anticipation notes are used by many municipalities to fund
acquisition of a wide range of items, including in many instances equipment. Most municipalities
believe it is better to buffer the tax rate impact of acquiring large equipment items by matching the
financing with the useful life of the asset. This is a proactive tax rate management program that
reduces the potential spike that infrequent cash purchases result in. Southlake successfully
utilized certificates of obligation funding to offset the tax rate impact of capital investment during
its past few years of tremendous growth in infrastructure need correlated to taxable assessed
value growth. It is important to note, that certificates of obligation are used by just about every
municipality to fund similar capital needs. In the past five years I have assisted over 20
municipalities (including many of Southlake's nearby peer cities) utilize certificates of obligation
for the same purposes as proposed in the capital improvement plan.
Southlake is an unique city, it has improved and increased its credit rating while simultaneously
experiencing rapid quality growth. It has funded the infrastructure required by this expansion
while at the same time increasing its long term debt capacity.
Please give me a call at (214) 953-4195 to discuss this memo or if you need any additional
information or analysis.
2
WAYNE K. OLSON
FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS
3400 BANK ONE TOWER
500 THROCKMORTON STREET
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-3821
TELEPHONE (817) 332-2580
(800) 318-3400
FAX (817) 3324740
August 6, 1996
Mr. Kevin Hugman VIA FAX AND REGULAR MAIL
Assistant to the City Manager
City of Southlake
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Household Hazardous Waste Contract
Dear Kevin:
You asked me to again review the proposed interlocal agreement for household
hazardous waste collection between the City of Fort Worth and the City of Southlake. You
particularly asked me to review a March 27, 1996 opinion written by Assistant City Attorney,
Kathryn A. Hansen of the City of Fort Worth, regarding the indemnification provisions
which are set forth in this contract. In a letter date April of this year, Mary Drake gave you
an overview of the potential liability to the city for entering into this contract. Therefore,
I won't dwell on the liability issues that were covered in Mary's letter.
The indemnification provisions are set forth in Section 8 of the contract. Section 8A
provides that the Southlake will indemnify all other participating cities for any personal
injuries or damages caused by the sole negligence of Southlake. I have no problems with
this provision.
Section 8B sets forth the terms of the environmental indemnification. This provision
provides for indemnification of all of the other participating cities in a proportion and
amount based upon the number of households from the City of Southlake contributing waste
f. \files\slake\letters\hugman.001
Mr. Kevin Hugman
August 6, 1996
Page 2
to the event. This indemnification purports to apply whether or not any particular party is
negligent and whether or not any violation of law has occurred.
The allocation of liability
paragraph explains that it is not possible to identify one city's waste from another's since the
waste will be aggregated for transportation and disposal. Therefore, this may be a fair
approach to assessing liability should any occur. It should be understood, however, that this
provision is meant to apply whether or not liability results from the hazardous household
waste event or as a result of some third party's disposal of hazardous waste in the same
landfill. It is also meant to apply and bind the city on a proportionate basis even if it can
be shown that a particular participating city was the cause of the liability. I question whether
this indemnification provision as written would be effective under Texas law if challenged
in court. However, if Southlake determines to be bound by this provision, it may choose to
accept this indemnification structure.
Section 8E requires that the Southlake city council adopt a resolution or other
mechanism to approve the contract which contains specific language guaranteeing that ad
valorem taxes will be levied and a sinking fund will be created in the event that any liability
arises by reason of the contract. I can only assume that the purpose of this provision is to
impress upon the city council at the time of approval of the contract of its commitment to
provide for the payment of a debt that may arise in the future. The inclusion of this
language in a resolution rather just in the contract appears to be superfluous. It does no
harm, however, and it is my understanding that this is a requirement that the City of Fort
Worth demands.
You have not asked for a discussion on this matter but let me point out that the
language required by Fort Worth to be included in the resolution may be insufficient to
allow Fort Worth to enforce an obligation upon Southlake to be liable for a future debt
arising out of the actions of third parties. Also, the specific language in the contract
regarding indemnification for liabilities under the contract does not meet the specific
requirements for an "express negligence" clause, and therefore might be challengeable.
In conclusion, the disposal of hazardous waste inherently entails potential liability.
By entering into this agreement, the city is taking on additional risks of liability above and
beyond risks currently being incurred by the city. The council should weight these risks
against the benefits that its citizens will derive from participating in this event. If the council
f. \files\slake\letters\hugman.O01
Mr. Kevin Hugman
August 6, 1996
Page 3
decides that the contract is in the best interest of its citizens, it is suitable for adoption as
drafted.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Li'e-
Wayne K. Olson
WKO/wrt/kb
cc: Curtis Hawk
f. \files\slake\letters\hugman.o01
0
31
FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P.
ATIDRNBY$
34M HM1X OM TO'WIR
SW TmocusoaTON sr.
PORT worm. Tx 76102.3ui
TBt.MONE tale 332 23W
FAX (217) 332-4740
D,'fl "`1
MARY td. ORAICE
April 16. 1996
134 N. LA SALI.E ST.
SUM 2222
CIMAGO, 11. 60602
Tei.F HONE (312) 2W7442
FAX (312) 263.6361
Ucsmd in ft Sumo of Taw and Udmks
Mr. Kevin Hugman - VIA FAX 817.488.6796
Assistant to the City Manager
City of Southlalm
667 S. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, Tx., 76M
Re: Housebiold Hazardous Waste
Dear Mr. Hugman:
As we originally discussed approximately a year ago, participation by Southlake
in a Household Haurdous Waste collection event will increase the possibility of
environumt t h liability attacbing to the city. Mw Council may nevertheless decide that
there we benefits to be gained by participation which outweigh this factor.
The difficulty arises because of the interplay of the two principal environmental
ceg d"Ory programs IIIWm tod by the . federal government, and then delegated to the
states. Disposal of Hawehold Hazardous Waste (HHW) falls within the scope of one
program but not the other.
HHW is a strangd beast. It is defined as waste produced by households and
similar generators, such as campgrounds, motels, and ranger stations, for example. It
is exempted from regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,
(RCRA) the federal Havirdous Waste handling and disposal statute, and its
hVleamenting regulations. The intent is to exempt waste produced by private citizens
in their daily acxhv 60 which, if getrerated by a commercial or industrial concern,
would be subject to regulation as a Hazardous Waste. An example would be paint
waste. Calms of leftover paint placed in the household garbage by a citizen and left at
the cutb arc not RCRA regulated Hazardous Waste and can legally be disposed of in
a solid waste landfill. However, the same paint disposed of by the paint manufacturer
would be a RCRA regulated Hazardous Waste and would be required to be disposed
of in a RCRA permitted Hazardous Waste landfill following all the RCRA precautions.
• The RCRA, program was originated by the federal govenunont, placed under the
supervision of USEPA, and then delegated to the states. The state programs are
Household Hazardous Waste
April 16, 1996
Page 2
required to be substantially equivalent to the federal one. Texas, like the vast majority
Of states, follows the federal scheme and exempts HHW from regulation under the
Texas Hazardous Waste handling and disposal regulatory program. This means that
there is no prohibition on disposing of HHW in solid waste landfills. (The only
exception to this is the disposal of used oil, used oil filters, tires, batteries and items
containing CFCs, eg. air conditioners and refrigerators, which is prohibited by the
Texas regulations).
Let me also state here that, in response to your request I have reviewed
Southlake's original waste collection contract with Lakeside Sanitation and the
assignment and amendment whereby Laidlaw assumed the contract. I am certain that
Laidlaw has no basis upon which to refuse to collect HHW in Southlake, except for
those five categories of waste enumerated above. Therefore the decision whether to
participate in a HHW collection event should not be made based on the mistaken
assumption that the citizens of Southlake have no means to dispose of HHW.
Returning to our regulatory analysis, the HHW waste stream does, however,
contain "Hazardous Substances" which fall within the scope of the second regulatory
program, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) popularly known as Superfund. Unlike RCRA, which
regulates "Hazardous Wastes% CERCLA regulates "Hazardous substances", when
"Hazardous Subsumes' are "released" into the environment. CERCLA, and the state
anmlog P 09MM, require "Responsible Parties" to perform studies and conduct cleanups
of released Hazardous Substances.
"Generators" of 'Hazardous Substances" are always responsible parties, along
with several outer categories of entities not relevant to our present discussion. Various
studies, now several years old, have shown that there is some percentage of hazardous
substances in the ordinary municipal waste stream. From the beginning of the
SWerfund program USEPA required municipalities to participate as "Potentially
Responsible Parties" (PRPs) when evidence existed that a municipality had disposed of
its nnunieipal wastes in a landfill which has become- a superfinnd site because of a
release to fife environment of a hazardous substance. However, public outcry against
this practice and the resulting political pressure on USEPA led to the publication in
1989 of an Interim Municipal Settlement Policy (54 Fed. Reg. S 1(71, Dec. 12, 1989).
This docnmertt stated, in a nutshell, that USEPA would, generally, "based on cost
effective use of enforoenaent resources", choose not to pursue municipalities who had
disposed of municipal waste at Superfirnd sites unless USEPA had "sufficient evidence
to demonstrate the presence of household hazardous waste." The other provisions of the
Policy do not affect our present discussion.
HHW collection programs treat HHW as a RCRA regulated Hazardous Waste.
This means that the collected waste is transported for disposal to a RCRA Permitted
Household Hazardous waste
April 16, 1996
Page 3
Hazardous Waste Landfill. It is sent under a Hazardous Waste manifest. A Hazardous
Waste generator number is assigned. It is shipped via a licensed Hazardous Waste
hauler. These procedures are followed because of the perception that environmental
protection is enhanced by keeping these wastes out of solid waste landfills. The
program also allows for collection of HHW in sufficient quantity that recyclers will take
some of the wastes and keep them from reaching any landfill. This rationale was and
continues to be the reason for HHW collection programs.
The above procedures are also the reasons why participating in a I- HW
collection program presents an increased liability exposure to the city. Superfund
liability arises then there is a "release" to the environment of a "Hazardous Substance".
There are many more Hazardous Waste landfills which are Superfund sites than solid
waste landfills. This is true in large part because Hazardous Waste sites are under far
greater regulatory scrutiny by both the states and USEPA. This is as it should be.
However, this also means that sending wastes, any wastes, to a Hazardous Waste
landfill is far more likely to lead to being a PRP than confining waste disposal to solid
waste sites only. I never advise a client to use a Hazardous Wastc landfill unless the
client needs to dispose of RCRA regulated Hazardous Waste.
There is an additional reason to be wary in this situation. Pursuant to the
Municipal Settlement Policy EPA reserved the choice to proceed against a municipality
if evidence existed which could be obtained without extensive expenditure of
enforcement r+esourcea that Hazardous Substances, le. HHW, had been contributed to
a Superfund site by a city. The HHW collection event records would provide that
evidence. This would eliminate the need to rely on the past analyses of the content of
Municipal waste streams to establish a contribution of Hazardous Substances sufficient
to Egger Superfund enforcement efforts directed at participating cities.
Further, the CERCLA statute, and its state analogs, provides for joint and
sevend liability on the part of each and all responsible parties. This means that any
responsible patty, no matter how small a quantity of Hazardous Substances it might
have contributed, can be required to foot the entire bill for the cleanup. I realize that
there is a mutual indemnification provision in the interlocal agreement governing this
event. However, while the agreement would be effective among the participants, the
regulatory agencies, pursuant to statute, ignore such agreements.
Unfortunately, a city cannot escape SupeMnd liability simply by confining its
HHW and municipal waste disposal to only solid waste landfills. Such landfills have
in the past become Superfund sites and continue to become so. However, these
landfills are significantly less likely to become tangled in the Superfund web. This is
true because they are, deservedly, not observed as closely by the regulatory authorities,
and also, becoft, if there is a release from a solid waste landfill it is less likely to be
a r+eleau of a hazardous substance, because of the types of waste disposed. Makes
A
Household Hazardous Waste
April 16, 1996
Page 4
sense, ,right?
Further, if there is a Hazardous Substance release from a solid waste landfill it
is much more difficult, because of the types of records required to be kept, to
determine whether Hazardous Substances were generated by particular customers of the
landfill. This is especially true for municipalities for which the records simply indicate,
"municipal waste." In order to show that Hazardous Substances have been disposed of
in a solid waste landfill by a municipality for purposes of Superfund liability the
regulatory authorities would be forced to fall back on the studies, now several years
old, which show that there is a percentage of Hazardous Substances in various wastes
in the average municipal waste stream. If the regulatory authorities chose to include
Southlake as a PRP in a solid waste landfill Superfund site, we could certainly argue,
with reasonable expecratlon of success, that those studies are invalid to show the
contribution of a relatively small city, mainly residential, with no manufacturing and
a low percentage of commercial development.
However, let us change our focus for a moment and look at the environmental
considerations. The impetus in the past for HHW collection days was to arrange for
the Hazardous Substances in the HHW to be disposed of in a Hazardous Waste landfill
because of the added safety factors in such disposal. In the past the added design and
operational safeguards available in Hazardous Waste landfills was considerable, and the
environment undoubtedly benefited from these programs.
However, I believe this is no longer necessary. Since the passage of the Subdde
D program by USEPA and its adoption and implementation by the states these same
safeguards, formerly required only in Hazardous Waste landfdls, are now required in
solid waste hm"113 as well. This is true of both new municipal landfills and in new
cells, (new areas of disposal) in solid waste landfills which operated prior to SubTitlee
D we which were allowed to continue operation after the Sub Title D regulations were
implemented.
These safeguards include double liners consisting of compacted clay and
synfttim, along with collection systems, to ciach the liquids and prevent their release
into groundwater. clay and or synthetic liners over the landfill for the same purpose,
landfill gas Prevention and collection, groundwater monitoring wells, absolute
prohibitions on siting landfills in certain high risk locations. These are the major items,
ConsequeWy, t1k remaining safeguards offered by Hazardous Waste landfills relate to
above ground operating protections. These include restricting public access, testing and
treadnent of wastes before disposal, transportation under mandbst and by licensed
haulexa, flnaneial restrictions and guarantees, certain reports to the regulatory
authorities, and strict housing requirements. All of these acre valuable when
dealing with truly toxic wastes from manufacturing and commercial concerns, typically
sent in large quantities. However, with the implementation of the Subtitle D
A
Household Hazardous Waste
April 16, 1"6
Page S
roquirerMM for solid waste landfills the 0r*l al reasons for HHW collection events
have lost much of their fora,
Lastly, let me bead off at the pass one possible mtisunderstanding. Ft. Worth
has 11=60ned that imv &vment in *HHW CORCction prograM may be a nwessary pan
of obaieing appmal of federal Storm Water Control programs. First, the storm water
program Will Act be Applicable to munieii W sewer systems for cities under 100,000
until 20M and it is not claw that it will apply to cities under 50,000 even then. So
Pardck"on by Southlalae as a requirement of any approval of permits ar programs for
Southgtice will not be dw case for the Foreseeable future. Participation in HHW
programs is not a Part of the statute ow regulations govrrrmng the storm water co4o►tcol
pogmm• Howem' Region VI has chosen, for reasOos which at not deaf to me, and
bawd on authority which is not elar to me, to include such a regn-emm in the draft
storm► permit applicable to Ft. Wowtb. fttkip"n by Soutbialce. Wwevow, will
have no e'feet on Ft. Wasth's standing with Region VI.
Thh has to a lengthy letter but I felt I needed to cover the =bjxt in
I detail for it to be helpful. Please Call if there at questions I have not addressed.
CC: Curtis Hawk
Wayne Olson
Allen Taylor
Mary E. Drake
Peter E. Landesberg, D.D.S.
305 E. Bob Jones Road
Roanoke, Texas 76262
(Southlake Residence)
(S 17) 430-4077
August 23, 1996
Dear Friends and Fellow Citizens of Southlake:
I would appreciate an opportunity to update you on some proposals and issues regarding future
development in Southlake affecting us all. A recent city funded survey of Southlake residents
(over -sampled to ensure accuracy) identified as one of the highest priorities, the need and desire
for "undeveloped natural open space." Walnut Grove Park is just that, except of course for the
already existing miles of dirt trails that provide access to the natural beauty and serenity found
along a small area by the south shore of Lake Grapevine.
We understand the dilemma the City of Southlake faces in attempting to satisfy the various needs
of its citizens and special interest groups. This is quite a task, considering the growth we've
experienced and that which has yet to come. We applaud the efforts and insight of the Parks
and Recreation Board in their attempts to address these demands, for example, developing a
master trail system throughout the City. This will enable children to safely travel between home
and school, and allow citizens of all ages to safely walk, jog, cycle, rollerblade, skateboard --
or even cartwheel -- on a designated paved path over 90 miles long. Also addressed was
development of parks providing baseball, soccer and multi -use fields each with some semblance
of walking/jogging trails. The list of our Parks and Recreation Board's fine work continues, but
the purpose of this letter is to focus on Walnut Grove Park.
It is obvious there is tremendous growth in our immediate future and we must face it head-on
so as to maintain control and allow only for responsible growth. Our natural, open, undeveloped
land is diminishing and the rural quality of Southlake, which attracted many of us here in the
first place, will soon be forgotten. The City of Southlake has proposed and intends to develop
Walnut Grove Park with looping roads, parking lots, and a ten foot wide paved path. This will
encourage and invite "cruising" traffic, bicyclists, rollerbladers and the like from all over the
metroplex to crowd Walnut Grove Park. The Park and Recreation Board has already addressed
the need for a designated multi -use paved path throughout the city in their master plan. Where
has the Park and Recreation Board addressed the need for undeveloped, natural open space?
We encourage those that can to visit Walnut Grove Park to see for themselves the rare
opportunity we have. This is our final chance to save what is probably our greatest and last
natural preserve. Without it, we will be losing part of the identity which connects us with our
Walnut Grove Park
August 23, 1996
Page 2
city's rich past, even more importantly, though, we will be denying our children and future
generations from experiencing and enjoying a rare and unique environment within Southlake's
backyard.
The obvious and intangible advantages of not developing Walnut Grove Park are many, but the
disadvantages of its development are even greater. Bicyclists and rollerbladers throughout the
metropiex will come in great numbers as evidenced by the "circus -like" atmosphere found at
White Rock Lake and Rockledge Park. Does this represent the undeveloped, natural open area
of beauty we are trying to preserve? Adjacent Bob Jones Park is slated to contain approximately
18 athletic fields in addition to other improvements. This alone will obviously draw large
numbers of people down White Chapel Road. Add to this the draw from a developed Walnut
Grove Park, and the increase in traffic will be dramatic. This arrangement will reduce both the
safety of our parks and the ability to appreciate and enjoy them. Consider then the logistics of
all this down a deadend road in a residential neighborhood.
Walnut Grove Park is also in the flood plain. If this development had been in place over the
last 12 years, areas would have been under water for months at a time on four separate
occasions (in 1983, 1989, 1990 and 1991) resulting in uncontrollable periods when this area is
unusable. Tax dollars will be needed for constant maintenance and repair. It has been
suggested and implied that a concrete path would be "maintenance free." If the public roads in
Timarron have problems, not to mention the entrance to Bicentennial Park, just imagine what
can happen to this "maintenance free" path when flooding occurs on average of every 2-5 years.
Walnut Grove Park has been home to equestrians, hikers, bird watchers and nature lovers for
many years. The horse trails have been on the national register since 1991 and must be
maintaaned for at least ten years. There are no plans to eliminate the horse trails. ' Also, in
order to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act, this paved path must be barrier free.
History has proven that 1) motorized vehicles will then re-enter the park (as they have in the
past) and 2) cyclists will not always remain on the paved path. Horseback riding and cycling
trails are mutually exclusive, incompatible and dangerous. One accident alone is too many, not
to mention the issue of liability. I believe placing this paved path in Bob Jones Park instead of
Walnut Grove Park makes it more cost effective. I also believe leaving Walnut Grove Park
natural makes it priceless.
The beauty of Walnut Grove Park lies not only as a natural habitat for wildlife and native plants
for people to enjoy, but it's free! This is federally owned property maintained under the
guidance of the Lake Grapevine Army Corps of Engineers. Why spend approximately $500,000
or more to forever change this rare gem? Why not preserve its natural beauty, provide the
Walnut Grove Park
August 23, 1996
Page 3
citizens of Southlake free access and use of undeveloped natural open land, and spend our hard
earned tax dollars on other more pressing programs?
I am confident that the Parks and Recreation Board believes they are working hard on our
behalf, as evidenced by their accomplishments to date. But with all due respect, I question their
direction regarding the use of Walnut Grove Park. If the public consensus is to leave it natural,
I urge everyone to express their opinions to the city now. The Parks and Recreation Board is
actively proceeding with their plans, but fortunately for us it's still in its preliminary stage. The
time to unite is now to preserve something special for generations to come. Walnut Grove Park
can be something Southlake can boast and be proud of -- a true "emerald jewel."
I respectfully ask you to join me in requesting the City of Southlake to amend its master trail
plan, and any other projects, so as to leave Walnut Grove Park as is. I appreciate your support
and look forward to keeping Southlake the special city it is.
(W Sincerely,
Y
Peter E. Landesberg, D.D.S.
(too, MEMO
TO: Southlake Parks Board
FROM: SPIN Neighborhood One
DATE: August 22, 1996
RE: Bob Jones Park
As planning continues for the Bob Jones Park, we feel it necessary to summarize the
concerns of the local neighborhood.
It has been stated the Park Board's proposed park layout is being driven by a perceived,
immediate need of the Soccer Association. To accommodate this need, it seems short-term
gain is overriding the goals and objectives/mission statement adopted by the Parks and
Recreation Board.
The contents of the proposed park will make for an impressive public facility --it is of the
utmost importance this facility be arranged to blend into and compliment the existing semi -
rural setting of the surrounding community.
To this end, the residents of SPIN Neighborhood One request as follows.
1 . Acknowledge the community setting
• The majority of the residents in this area occupy small acreage tracts in a semi -rural
community.
• Properties abutting the park to the north are 5-10 acre "ranchettes" which are
utilized for horses, cattle, goats, etc.
2. Acknowledge the proposed plan
• Bob Jones Park is a slightly deceiving title; much of the "park" area is being
dedicated to an athletic complex.
• Park land is considered a welcome addition to any neighborhood. It can blend in
with the existing rural setting of our community and would have a positive impact
on adjacent property values.
• An athletic complex is not a welcome addition in any neighborhood. It is usually
located in a more commercial/light industrial setting. It definitely does not blend
well with the existing community and, should it be located as proposed in the
current masterplan, would have a negative impact on adjacent property values.
3. Assess the impact
• The neighborhood is not wholly opposed to the park or the proposed activity areas;
the main concern is the location of those activity areas.
• Through several neighborhood meetings, a general consensus has been reached --
transition the park layout so minimal impact activities abut the residential properties
and major impact activities are moved as far away as possible.
MEMO
August 22, 1996
Page 2
To illustrate the neighborhood perception of "impact," we suggest a zone
classification where Zone 0 = low impact; and Zone 5 = high impact.
Zone 0 - planted buffer
Zone 1 - lake, walk/jog paths, exercise stations, picnic area
Zone 2 - children's playground, pavilions, equestrian area
Zone 3 - soccer fields, amphitheater
Zone 4 - parking
Zone 5 - baseball fields
4. Accommodate our recommendations
• Minimum 150-foot buffer against all residential properties to include earth berm and
dense, fast growth evergreen planting.
• Orient lake as proposed on residents plan where lake swings into 17 acre northwest
corner property.
• Walking/jogging path with exercise stations around perimeter of lake.
• Soccer fields and parking moved south of Bluebird Lane.
• Baseball fields eliminated or moved to far south end of park.
• Low intensity, directional lighting for any parking areas, playing fields requiring
lighting.
• Add turn lane into parking area along White Chapel.
• Fencing along White Chapel to address safety concerns.
The current forum for residents input in developing the masterplan for Bob Jones Park is
greatly appreciated. The community applauds the efforts of the Park Board Committee and
looks forward to continued involvement in the planning and development stages of what
will be a great parks and recreational facility.
Fax Cover Sheet
Date Sent: August 29, 1996
Time Sent: 9:30 P.M.
Number of Pages (incl. cover) 3
To: Mayor Rick Stacy
City Council Members:
Ralph Evans
Wayne Moffat
Pamela Muller
David Harris
Gary Fawks
(400, Scott F. Martin
Director Parks and Recreation:
Kim McAdams Lenoir
FAX Number: 817488-6796
From: Diane Blais
Phone: 817-430-4529
Fax #: 817-430-3765
Remarks:
Please distribute copies to all addressees. Thu* you.
AUG 3 0 1996
OFFICE OF CITY
SECRETARY
August 29, 1996
Tim Hogsett
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department
Grants -in -Aid Program
4200 Smith School Road
Austin, Texas 78744
Dear Mr. Hogsett:
We are concerned residents of Southlake, Texas who have numerous concerns related to the new
Bob Jones Park for which, on June 25, 1996, the City of Southlake submitted an application for a
developmental grant. Let us start by advising you that we are not opposed to the Paris
development. We believe it can be a wonderful addition to our community given adequate
planning and foresight.
We are, however, ooncerned about the Southlake Park Board's reluctance to address w7esssed
concerns regarding the Master Plan for the park and the adjacent Army Corps of Engineers
property along Grapevine Lake. Specrflcally, we do not believe the Park Board and the City
Government have met the requirements detailed m their groat application. The oonoen s which
have not been adequately addressed by the Southlake Park Board are as follows:
1. The grant application strongly stresses the preservation of the natural az Mmument that oodsts
in the proposed park property. There is a stipulation that 500A of the property would be k8 open
and natural, and 50'/. developed for recreational facilities and parking arm. The park plots
developed to date indicate that substantially more than the WA will be developed and are
overwhohmngly dominated by urban sports facilities.
The Southlake residents' request for an adequate natural buffer from noise; lights, puking lots,
etc. have not been adequately addressed by the Park Board. 7U board has on several oocasions
stated that this would be a waste of space. The residential neighborhoods amurKftg the
proposed park are unanimous in their belief that a `natural" buffer could euDy be incorporated to
enhance the open, natural objectives detailed extensively in the grant application.
2. As stated in the grant application. (page 2) "The Southlake Patio. Ra readon and Open Space
Master Plan adopted in 1992 set forth a goal that relates to ttail.system plantmtg: Conserve and
enhance Southlake's re raining natural resourm to mainbin the City's a -hou memtal health and
quality of life", The Park Board has refused to adequately caw* the nature of trans (natural
versus paved) proposed for the Corps of Engineer land preferring to delay this into the design
and construction phase. Given that this is federal property, both citizens of Southlake and
citizens of neighboring cities, requested that the 4 mile area oomprisiag the Corps of Engine e
trails remain natural.
This is not unreasonable given that (a) there are 91 miles of paved hike and bike trails proposed
for the city of Southlake and (b) the majority of this property is shown in FEMA floodplain (map
attached to grant application), (c) tax Pays dollars should not be wasted on peviag trails that will
be destroyed by flooding, and (d) Grapevine Lake had prolonged Hooding (above 560) ilk 1983,
1989, 1990 and 1991.
(Ove . '
The grant application states that "master Planning of the entire site is to be completed by August
1996. Delaying decisions on the trail composition to the design and eonstmction phase is an
unacceptable response by the Parks Board.
3. The Packs Board has not addressed the adverse effects related to the satbty and traffic
congestion. The only access to the park is from a rural mad. White Chapel Road a an
undersized, very narrow, windy road in extremely poor condition and considered dangerous
today. Huge dips and eroded pavement make tt difficuk to oontmt a vehicle sound taro blind
curves at any speed. Road improveoxnI arc iurV= ve prior to the inwassed traffic this road
Will expaxece once the park is developed. 77he Board ostimum that on any Slum evening during
a soccer season that more than 2,500 area children will use the Park's recreational halkies.
Technically, the property for which the grant has been applied for, is in Denton County, not
Tarrant as desoribW in the applicadom h lies within the Nortirweat Independent School District,
rot the Carroll Independent School District. These is no i Wixom to ekhor in the appiiontion. I
believe both sovatdng bodies would have an interest iiont a taxing authority vieMpoint given the
tax base of both would be impacted. Substantial taxes are paid to both entities.
We have spoken to various neighborhood SPIN (Southlalae Program for the involvement of
Neighborhoods) groups, friends, and business associates in many parts of the City Who agree that
more hearings are necessary to adequately plan a park that wfil preserves and eniance the
treasured natural open areas for future generations of Texans.
We are suggesting that it would be in the beat interest of all the tax payers in the State of Texas to
delay approval of the grant for Bob Jones Park until adequate public hearings and emrironmttttaI
concerns can be addressed through democratic and open public meetings.
Respectfully submitted,
The Undersigned Residents of Southlake
Ao"�A441`�
cc: Mayor Rick Stacy
Southiake City Councilmembers
Southlake Planning tit Zoning Commission
Kim McAdams Lenoir, Director -Parks Dept
A
City of Southlake, Texas
August 29, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: SPIN Representative Selection Process
As SPIN continues to mature, we continue to refine our procedures for accomplishing the
mission of the program. One of the challenges we have had, as you are well aware, is filling
vacancies on the Standing Committee. Filling the vacancies in SPIN Neighborhood #10 and
Neighborhood #14 has been the most current effort. The process worked very well -- we had
more people involved than in efforts past -- and it seems that this is a good opportunity to
illustrate how the selection process has worked.
1) When a vacancy occurs, a letter is sent from the SPIN Chair to every resident
of the SPIN neighborhood, describing the program and its accomplishments and
soliciting volunteers,
2) A database is developed of the names of individuals who respond to the letter.
The responses include those who are interested in serving SPIN in some
capacity, or those who are interested in participating in the selection process.
3) Once the calls begin to taper off, a meeting date is set to give residents the
opportunity to select their representative.
4) This meeting date is publicized extensively. - A press release is sent to area
papers, notice is placed on the cable channel, a copy of the press release is sent
to the homeowners associations in the SPIN neighborhood, Neighborhood
Council representatives are notified. Personal phone calls are also placed by
staff and the current SPIN representatives inviting residents to the meeting.
5) The meeting consists of a brief orientation of SPIN, a description of the duties
and obligations (including the Ordinance requirements and the Code of
Conduct), and a description of the support provided by City staff. The residents
are then asked to discuss who they would like to recommend to Council for
appointment. NOTE: SPIN representatives and staff attending the meeting do
not participate in this portion of the discussion and in no way attempt to
influence the outcome.
6) The name of the selected resident is then forwarded to the City Council via staff
for appointment.
Just so you are aware, the meeting held with SPIN Neighborhoods #10 and #14 had attendance
which was fairly representative of each neighborhood, as noted below:
N=
Subdivision
#-
Rita Pancake
Summerplace
10
Susan Henry
Summerplace
10
Thomas Essig
Summer place
10
Candace Harris
Southview
10
Melody Windrow
Summer place
10
Tamara McMillan
Mission Hills
10
Chris Williamee
Diamond Circle
10
Nora Coon
Oak Hill Estates
10
Al Morin
Diamond Circle
10
Terri Hitchcock
Hills of Monticello
14
Doug McKelvey
Princeton Park
14
Bill Flaherty
Monticello Estates
14
Lisa Alexander
Timberlakes
14
Ted Robbins
Southlake Hills
14
Pam Gagnon
Southlake Hills
14
Dina Upton
Hills of Monticello
14
Ultimately, the groups selected Al Morin (#10) and Doug McKelvey (#14). These
recommendations will be coming to you at your September 17 meeting. Please note that other
participants at the meeting have agreed to participate in SPIN at the Neighborhood Council
level.
S
A
icrk_ C „S
•r...v VVIIJ
Committee
reps to -be
chosen soon
News and Times
A brief meeting will be held on
Tuesday, Aug. 27, to select SPIN
standing committee representa-
tives for SPIN neighborhoods
#10 and #14.
The meeting will begin at 7
p.m. and will be held in the
White's Chapel Room -at the
Community Center at Bicenten-
nial Park. All, residents of these
SPIN neighborhoods are invited
to attend and participate in the
selection of their respective rep-
resentatives:,
Neighborhood # 10 includes the
area roughly bounded by High-
land to the north,- Carroll to the
east, and tracts located just west
of White's Chapel. It includes the
subdivisions of Summerplace,
Chapel Downs, Oak Hill Estates,'
Mission Hill Estates, Lake Wood
Acres, Southview, Diamond
Circle Estates, White Chapel ad-
dition, Adams addition and oth-
ers.
Neighborhood #14 includes the
area roughly bounded by FM
1709 to the. north, White's Chapel
to the east, the city limits to the
south, and tracts of prop
the west side of South Peyton-
ville. It includes the subdivisions
of Lake Crest, Timberlakes,
(see "Group, "page 3)
Group
from page 1
Princeton. Park, Monticello Es-
tates, the Hills of .Monticello,
Southlake Hills, Chimney Hill,
Air Park Estates, Country Walk,
Continental Park Estates and oth-
ers.
All residents of these neighbor-
hoods are encouraged to attend
the meeting to learn more about
SPIN and to take an active role
in the selection of the standing
committee representatives.
For more information, call
Shana Yelverton at 481-5581,
Ext. 705.
SPIN Standing Committee
Representatives To Be Selected
Residents of SPINS (Southlake
the Adams Addition, and others.
Program for the Involvement of
(Please see map.)
Neighborhoods) 10 and 14 are en-
SPIN 14 is located within the
couraged to attend a meeting to
area roughly bounded by 1709 to
select their respective Standing
the north, White's Chapel to the
Committee representatives. The
, east, the city limits to the south, and
meeting will be 1ielday; Au-. iracts'ofproperty on the west side
grist 27 at 7pni at the Community
of South Peytonville. 71t includes
Center at Bicentennial Park.
the subdivision of Lake Crest,
SPIN 10 is located within the
Timberlakes, Princeton Park,
area roughly bounded by Highland ,
Monticello Estates, the Hills of
to the north, Carroll to the east, and
' Monticello, Southlake Hills, Chim-
ttacts located just west of White's ,
ney Hill, Air Park Estates, Coun-
Chapel. It includes the subdivi-
' try Walk, Continental Park Estates,
sions of Summerplace Addition,
etc.
Chapel Downs, Oak Hill Estates,
For more information contact
Mission Hill Estates, Lake Wood
Shana Yelverton at 481-5581, ext.
Acres, .Southview,Diamond Circle
705..
Estates, White's Chapel Addition,
spy 19,19q9
SPIN 14 Needs Rep
by Terry Fox
The city announced recently
that a representative will be needed
for SPIN # 14, located (roughly)
north and adjacent to Continental
Blvd., between Peytonville Ave.
and White's Chapel Rd.
SPIN, a program to involve
Southlake neighborhoods, relies
upon representatives who are re-
sponsible for coordinating commu-
nication between City Hall and
Southlake's 16 neighborhoods.
Each representative serves on the
SPIN Standing Committee, which
meets monthly with city staff to
discuss current issues and to man-
age the SPIN program by develop-
ing policies and procedures for
SPIN administration. Four of the
monthly meetings are joint meet-
ings with the City Council, which
are designed to promote dialogue
between elected officials and SPIN
neighborhoods by providing infor-
mation to residents through meet-
ings, producing newsletters, or by
other methods effective in the par-
ticular neighborhood.
"It's hard work, but it's ex-
tremely satisfying," said Laura
Miklosko, vice chair of the SPIN
Standing Committee. "We are pro-
vided with all the information we
need to fully understand what is
going on with the City; we are in-
troduced to and work with all of
the players and more importantly,
we have an opportunity to make a
real difference ilt our community.
I would encourage all Southlake
residents to seriously consider get-
ting involved with the program."
Anyone wishing to swerve as a
SPIN representative, or wanting
more information about the pro-
gram should contact Shana
Yelverton at 481-5581, ext. 705.
KSB Trash -Off Saturday
Keep Southlake Beautiful mem-
bers and volunteers throughout the
city will be out Saturday morning,
July 20 picking up litter along
adopted roadways.
The quarterly trash -off will be
followed by a thank you picnic with
free food and door prizes from 12
to 2pm at the lodge in Bicenten-
M
nial Park, sponsored by KSB,
Southlake Parks and Recreation,
and the City of Southlake.
There are still many roads or
specific areas that have not been
adopted in Southlake; for more in-
formation on how you can help,
call Tom Sandc:rlin at 488-7965 or
Ed Mcroy at City Hall at481-5581.
—I,D, %'.
3o O'Neal
Ch pel Downs HOA
101 :Trail
iou Texas 76092
iue Tepper
L e Crest HOA
15 Canyon Lakes
Sou Make, Texas 76092
tic Waltke
Hill Estates HOA
i80 Truelove Trail
Sou h1ake, Texas 76092
tic and McMichael
Sou hview HOA
350 Binkley
iou ake, Texas 76092
City of Southlake, Texas
John Blackburn
Chimney Hills HOA
1003 Chimney Hill Trail
Southlake, Texas 76092
Susan Craney
Mission Hills HOA
1020 Alamo
Southlake, Texas 76092
Rich Klena
Southlake Hills HOA
1305 Meadow Ridge Court
Southlake, Texas 76092
V
Cole McDowell, President
Heatherwood Custom Homes
3624 Long Prairie Road
Flower Mound, Texas 76092
Terry Wilkinson
Monticello Estates HOA
930 Parkview
Southlake, Texas 76092
Tom Chapman
Southlake Hills East HOA
OW-1 &101i�i'A
SIGN-UP SHEET
Tuesday, August 27, 1996
PIN W
#V4 Recruitment Meeting -- Neighborhoods #10 & #14
NAME (please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
NO.
SPIN
Neighborhood
6 V l c.K v A
4
z
/*4/0ca-A::E
3
4
5
([I �(*Ac 0rrk
4 e l-o44
/Lj
6
a).-
7
I o I e(�w4e� Loves
L I -20+2
8
LISA
6)o9 --)-,,n 6 r kz �iz_
9
j 0
10
n ra
&
d /- y8d
C7
12
LIA IA
—t ►
13
14 ��'�J`' lJ&,V�/—/
v�
SIGN-UP SHEET
Tuesday, August 27, 1996
SPIN ®R
#lot Recruitment Meeting -- Neighborhoods #10 & #14
NAME (please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
' NO.
SPIN
Neighborhood
1
0.��� ��sOr
Sag -
6eqy
2 ]a%
r` �
c�-
l a.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
PROVIDENCE CENTER for Consulting and Planning
PO Box 425979 - Denton Texas USA - 762045979
304 Administration Drive - Denton Texas USA - 76201
817.898.0300 - fax 817.898.0201 - email J waters@TWU.EDU
August 23, 1996
Curtis Hawk, City Manager
CITY OF SOUTHLA KE
667 North Carroll Avenue
Southlake, TX 76092
Re: Tri-City Executive Summary
Dear Curtis:
AW96;.
OFFICE -OF c
- — __.MOU, ..
Here is a five -page Executive Summary of the Tri-City Library Project report.
If you have any questions let me hear from you.
Sincerely,
for PROVIDENCE
Richard L. Waters
Principal Consultant
enclosure
copy: Trent Petty, GRAPEVINE
Bob Stripling, COLLEYVILLE
0
-- � Q [ �
`n•�w v� c`� ~ Ow cd �'o U �
° u,o S.m y.1 8
O (&) = -- vp�
>.Gc
um cc u
73 cc p CD
yq C cv c[v CA U &cc -C)w
0-4
a�Ln cc
VW r�hy V1 `p "" b U 3 .� 0 Q .0 G °
3OwV Cwto 9"bop�.�
�E3 I �ca
cc
CowL.
es Cd E� ��
Pa W W a6. .0° � 7 80 =T-1 o
too
00� GL co cc •p y y G
O W O Q Q •> ~ A O acis Cow 'G � i
W / 1 cc� Ur &O a O 00 rA
e_[a�,�3
W o.� ~•>0b
dA a �� , � o
r0 (Uu� �yCy va�3O. W o���y
Fes) Q -S w w 0 & .2 >
�1 a� 00 ° 'b cd
a, o Cn ao a „
� p
CA
Chow arCoE�>,o a ��o°�'o�
Q
c $ O
a)
O en W) N g rM-+ t- N 'a 'b .a? V O y 0
KMN•;
to
.0O_>[�
w °$co' 3:
S V O y '= O Z''� •a
°tog Q8
U c 4)
�$ O O O °
gagCC CC
cp
3Swe a�r_0
W12
V
v a vC3
o CC
•�2a �49CC
O
CC 8
CA 8
y W
.t 00%o �,•�•o
a g�� .� H 'g N �n N G ca
u �.
v i4M N Q v 69 z 40 S a
co
y av
F �o'��G cC13
„W W U cd z•...
—QQ-ctier � .E•+ cow $ EyW 1 VC7cs EyW UC7� IS v� a �
NJ
�o
n
r-
00
O
c
V1
0
M
0
t�
0
N
ON
x
y
CI
H
H
H
s
N
r�
O
W
�4„
v
o
O
N
00
h
.Ni
V
�w�
vJ
ly
W
00
in
00
MV1
O
C%
v
r
H
,.•
H
h
W
�00
►�
y
N
in
CV
o
0000
N
b00
M
en
VI
�w
rjj
en
A
as
� 34,
H
d
H
S
y
'D
r-
00
h
M
�
c
o
0
0
Oi
N
H
.s
N
0
o�
allo
O
rr
v
0
0
C
r
v
00
00
�
e
en
�
W
c
V1
pPp
O+
00
H
►�+
>
v
NH
M
O
W
y
CI
H
$
N
rr
N
., g
a -� ar
�
`ti
N
.•p.
v
h
G:7
0
0000
N
8 `• i0
�'
M
0�0
N
tMr1
O0�
Col-0
u
Mod
laic
^ems
W
w
z�+Nvi
E+Z
v
v
F
Vl
00
p
e�
0
A
a
v�
0
Q
6.
toto
to
0 cc
v 3 > y n. 7 �:
C w O U C [ [ W C pOp
4) y GO cd ^a G > C cc� y � �E
CO o 0 n. b e
y ) 0 C Wr-q > ��' O w 8 cc
web >.a cn
O 0-03 .0 c cn a
CA
to
�.G;� to o o a� ca �w cc
co
coto
Q {.r Q U •r, •O r+ „(,' I.n tir Ur y t' ..C:
CA Q cc
CA
o0 0 � 8 a n� 3 ,� 8 '� •� a y � � •a.
_ ccWO yy�. •� y..
Ur y �. cC cd a) cV .LQ7 cts
a) U O
Ej
0 cc cc
0cc Q.� �u.�> VU.`"au a>i .� a. u a�.b a��
3y�= ccds 0•i O��O .a'8 > [ mac° vw
c
cc 0
cd bow cc
cc
>-8rz 0 a a
cc 2a
Cc W Cc
go
0.0 � cc IV cz
U '§C6.4 a1 °� 3 OC � o
"Ca 0
y -0 cc a3 Ei
ace 4) •� •[ � � Cc
8 W �^" .W
u 3 S-S � .c. ��, U g� a aw, a -9 ; ,� a
O
0 w ,a ., a� a� ,c •• 3
Q
n.
a� CIL)
E e
O
cr.. �
E o
e cc
43 � 'cc
U r• r
02>�=�
y ri
=.0
��° "•5a
y w b�
.��. 's
U o
•Q
H 0 0
0
•g'b8�
� E ta o d
0 .� C.)zv ��3
to
p
9
O
000
aUi.�¢
�El
u.o'���i,
zo o � A
Cc
�
w oz8
tka� _
0•3�
E"
4) ow•V it A
a
0 0
O'�
0
2
o
F
0-ti
N
QQao`"Q
VOyAc��
Q
> o R7 8
v
U. EA0ub
� = 9: 04,
o
38at
i
�J_2r�L
:4
A
JUNE 1996 JOHN SHARP • TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Local Sales Tax Guide —
Update 1996 �\
ocal sales and use taxes
generate necessary
revenue for local govern-
ments and special purpose dis-
tricts. Some of these taxes help
provide funds for day-to-day
operations, some produce dollars
used for economic development
and others aid in lessening the
property tax burden. Still others
produce money for providing
much -needed services.
The Comptroller's office is pre-
senting this guide on local sales
tax options to help cities, counties,
and other political subdivisions
understand the various forms of
Cities draw funds through
1 percent tax .................. 3
Cities plan strategically for
economic development . 4
No accidental touristsl ... 10
Any local business
booms? ........................ 13
Like a shot in the arm .... 19
In case of emergency.... 21
Districts form to control
crime............................ 25
Volume 12, Issue 2
local taxa-
tion. This
issue also
includes
changes
in the
laws
from the
74th Leg-
islature.
The
newest
tax is)the
county
?SOO
CMS =�'"° SERVICES
development district tax, designed
to provide areas in eligible coun-
ties with funding to promote eco-
nomic development.
Increasing in popularity is the
sales tax under the Development
Corporation Act of 1979, better
known as "the economic develop-
ment sales tax." In 1995, cities
generated more than $107 million
from this tax. On April 1, 1996,
258 cities were collecting some
form of this tax.
W�a
VOL. 12, ISSUE 2
Another local option is a sales
tax to reduce the property tax rate.
It has been available since 1987.
For cities, this tax is usually refer-
red to as the "additional municipal
sales and use tax," and for coun-
ties, it is called the "county sales
and use tax:' This tax, which is
available to eligible cities, coun-
ties and hospital districts, pro-
duced more than $323 million in
1995: 247 cities generated more
than $138 million; 115 counties,
(See Sales Tax on page 2)
City & County Financial Management
14
Letter From the Comptroller
Local Sales Taxes: Options
for,Government Operations
s funds become tighter, local governments
are struggling with difficult choices on how
to finance operations. Eligible cities and
counties can opt for different sales taxes, but need to
be aware that some taxes are restricted and may serve
different purposes. A community should determine
the best available option by carefully assessing its
needs.
To help local officials, we update our local sales tax
guide in a special issue of City
do County Financial Manage-
ment. The statutes regarding
the local sales taxes are com-
plex. To make it easy to follow,
we incorporated the latest
changes in the law so that the
articles stand as a guide to ev-
erything from petitioning for a sales tax election to
levying the tax to using the revenues.
This guide has become very popular with our read-
ers, so we are happy to comply with the requests for
another update. In this issue, we added a special sec-
tion on the new county development districts and the
district tax. We responded to our readers who said
they would like more information regarding the steps
for forming some of the special taxing districts. We
also included more examples from cities and counties
about how they are using she revenues.
We have something for everyone involved: the
governing bodies, county judges, city secretaries,
and election officials, among others. We referenced
citations to make additional research easier for city
and county attorneys, auditors and treasurers.
Local officials may want to review their revenue
sources and their options for local sales taxes to better
serve their community's changing needs for new or
different programs. I expect that more and more local
governments will be weighing
these options carefully. We
hope that the 1996 Local Sales
Tax Guide will provide the
necessary information to help
you reach the best decisions
for your. citizens.
This issue is designed to
improve your knowledge of the local sales tax laws.
Please let us know if you need additional information
or if you have any questions regarding local sales
taxes. As always, my staff is here to help you at
1-800-531-5441, ext. 3-4679.
Sales Tax Guide U p d ate (continued from page 1)
almost $170 million; and seven
hospital districts, more than S 15
million.
Passed in 1967, the municipal
sales and use tax, better known as
the "regular one percent tax," has
been around the longest. Cities
had more than $1.45 billion avail-
able in tax revenues for daily op -
City & County Financial Management
erations in 1995 from the one per-
cent municipal sales tax.
Other sales and use taxes fund
the operations of special purpose
districts, such as hospitals, health
services, emergency services, and
crime control and prevention dis-
tricts.
Editor's note: This issue
focuses on local sales tax infor-
mation. These laws are stated in
general terms. Always consult
your city or county attorney to
determine how the law applies
in specific situations. ■
Volume 12, Issue 2
14
Cities draw funds
through 1 percent tax for
daily operations
any cities fund their
day-to-day operations
through the municipal
sales and use tax, which is often
referred to as the "regular one per-
cent" tax. Created in 1967, the
regular one percent local sales and
use tax serves as a source of reve-
nue available to any incorporated
city, upon voter approval. Because
the revenue is intended for daily
operations, cities usually deposit
the tax revenues in their general
revenue fund.
Eligibility
Municipalities have the authori-
ty to adopt or repeal the sales and
use tax under V.T.C.A., Tax Code,
Chapter 321. The Tax Code de-
fines a municipality as any incor-
porated city, town or village (more
commonly known as an incorpo-
rated city). Any of these entities
are eligible to adopt this tax.
Calling for an election
A city may hold an election to
adopt or repeal the tax after its
governing body adopts an ordi-
nance calling for the election. The
ordinance may be initiated in two
ways: either by a majority vote of
the governing body's members or
by petition of qualified voters
equal to at least 20 percent of the
number of votes cast in the most
recent regular municipal election.
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.401.)
If the election is by petition, the
governing body must determine if
the petition is sufficient within 30
Volume 12, Issue 2
day
receiving it. If
the petition is sufficient, the gov-
erning body must adopt the ordi-
nance calling for the election
within 60 days. (Refer to
V.T.C.A., Tax Code §321.402.)
The city must hold the election
to adopt the tax on the next.uni-
form election date that allows for
enough time to hold the election.
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.403.)
The uniform election dates are:
• the .third Saturday in January;
• the first Saturday in May;
• the second Saturday in
August; and
• the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November.
Note: Cities may hold a tax
election in November only
during odd -numbered years.
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Election
Code §§41.001, 41.003.)
Ballot wording
When preparing for an election,
a city must print the ballot to al-
low the voters the choice of voting
for or against the proposition. Fol-
lowing is the ballot language re-
quired by law:
1. For a municipality to adopt
the tax, the ballot should
state:
A one percent sales and use
tax is adopted within the city.
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.404(a).)
2. For a municipality to repeal
the tax, the ballot should
state:
The local sales and use tax
within the city is abolished
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.404(b).
(See Cities on page 18)
City & County Financial Management
14
14
Cities plan strategically
for economic development
trategic planning to win
new commerce and expand
existing businesses is the
key to the success of the more
than 200 Texas municipalities us-
ing revenues from sales and use
taxes. The cities hope that this key
unlocks the doors of opportunities
to increased industry and jobs for
their communities.
Since 1979, Texas law has al-
lowed cities to form econom-
ic development corporations
to attract businesses and
create job opportuni-
ties. In 1989, the
Legislature gave
eligible cities
the op-
tion of
adopting a dedi-
cated sales and use
tax to fund many
industrial develop-
ment projects. Further legislation
in 1991 recognized the need of
some cities for funds to improve
their appeal as places to live, work
and visit.
This local sales and use tax is
commonly known as "the eco-
nomic development sales tax."
The authority to enact the sales
and use tax for economic develop-
ment is in Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
art. 5190.6 §§4A, 4B, the Devel-
opment Corporation Act of 1979.
In 1991, the 73rd Legislature add-
ed §4B, which allows greater flex-
ibility in the use of revenues. Eli-
gible cities may adopt either §4A,
§4B or both.
City & County Financial Management
Over the last seven years, sever-
al cities have completed projects
or launched successful ongoing
economic development programs,
using revenues from §4A taxes.
Recently, more cities have chosen
§413 taxes, with their less restric-
tive criteria for project eligibility.
Generally, allowable §4B expendi-
tures in-
clude not only
those available under §4A,
but also municipal infrastructure
improvements and many projects
that contribute to the quality of
life in the community.
Cities may adopt an economic
development sales tax under §4A
or §4B at a rate of 1/4, 3/s or'/z
percent if the new combined rate
of all local sales and use tax
would not exceed 2 percent. Cities
may also limit the duration of the
tax and the use of the fund under
§4A.
Following are some current or
recent examples of -projects fi-
nanced by §4A or §4B taxes.
§4A projects
Allen. Using sales tax revenues
and Texas Leverage Fund assis-
tance, the city acquired 92 acres
for a corporate park, and offers
low-cost land for high-tech manu-
facturing and multiple use. One
company is investing $40 million
and will hire 165 people. Another
company has contracted for
150,000 square feet and will em-
ploy 400 persons.
Big Spring. Since adopting
the tax in 1990, the city has
created or kept 375 jobs. An
expansion grant enabled one
company to retain 13 ad-
ministrative positions and
add 30 jobs. After ob-
taining a loan from the
development corpora-
tion for equipment
and facilities expan-
sion, another company
added 30 jobs.
Brownfield.
Seeking to quickly
provide 160 direct
jobs, the city focused on
prisons. It used sales tax revenues
to buy 180 acres, and then contrib-
uted $200,000 toward building a
new state prison. In addition, the
revenues helped to provide for an
11-acre, city -owned prison facili-
ty. Brownfield also attracted a pri-
vate prison company to lease and
operate the facility.
Cedar Hill. Using §4A tax rev-
enues, the city paid. for a vacant,
150-acre industrial park, and up-
grades to streets, railroad tracks,
and the sewer and water system. A
Volume 12, Issue 2
14
$90.000 grant will help a major
employer expand a manufacturing=
plant by 56,000 square feet.
Hillsboro. The city used sales
tax revenues to lend money to
a mobile home manufacturer to
build and equip two plants, pro-
viding 350 new jobs.
La Feria. The city directed
much of its economic develop-
ment effort toward restoring build-
ings to make them attractive and
functional for business operations.
Its §4A revenues fund a locally
initiated Main Street Program that
provides architectural, financing
and remodeling assistance to
property owners who want to re-
furbish historic buildings. The
city attracted a movie produc-
tion company and assisted in
remodeling the facilities that
house it. Using sales tax reve-
nues, it also developed an in-
dustrial and mixed -use park,
and has attracted businesses,
including retailers, concrete pipe
manufacturers, and even a tool-
and-moldmaker servicing a maq-
uiladora plant.
Longview. Since voters ap-
proved the tax in 1991, successes
include 2,200 new jobs and a $34
million tax base increase. Sales
tax revenues helped to fund the
purchase of land for the newly
completed, 483-acre, $6.5 million
Longview Business Park. Neiman
Marcus, the anchor tenant, opened
a $20 million, 200-employee dis-
tribution center in December.
Sales tax revenues help fund in-
centive packages; 13 out of 22
packages aided local companies'
expansion.
Pampa. Sales tax monies pro-
vided 90-day, zero -interest emer-
gency loans when a tornado dev-
astated 23 businesses in an
industrial area. The loans enabled
the companies to rebuild and oper-
ate while awaiting insurance claim
settlements. Tax revenues also
paid for land development for an
industrial park. Funds allowed one
manufacturer to purchase a build-
ing, renovate, and buy additional
equipment, saving 46 manufactur-
ing jobs. This manufacturer will
also add 44 positions. Short-term
loan guarantees were provided to
two manufacturers for operating
capital and for equipment purchas-
es until they could obtain long-
term financing.
Paris. The city used sales tax
funds to upgrade a road providing
access to its largest manufacturing
employer. It is pursuing other in-
frastructure projects, including
improving a street serving an in-
dustrial area. The city is develop-
ing a 176-acre industrial park, and
entering a build -to -suit project to
attract an industrial manufacturer
with 25 new jobs. To meet the
needs of the local industry,•the
sales tax also funds a two-year
workforce training program at
Paris Junior College.
Pharr. The economic develop-
ment sales tax provided funds for
an industrial park to expand from
150 to 230 acres to accommodate
business relocations. The city pur-
chased a building for its business
incubator program and provided
start-up businesses with low cost
office and manufacturing space,
office equipment and support ser-
vices. Sales tax revenues, applied
to help pay off a Texas Leverage
Fund loan, allowed a company to
stay in Pharr, build a 32,000
square -foot facility and add 70
employees. A low -interest revolv-
ing loan fund encourages small
businesses to expand.
Raymondville. The city's con-
tribution of 7.5 acres to an auto
mall development brought in a
$500,000 investment by a dealer-
ship. Sales tax proceeds also fund-
ed the installation of utilities for a
204-acre industrial park site.
Seguin. To attract a manufac-
turer, the economic development
corporation and the city entered
into joint ownership of a 25,000
square -foot plant. The company
uses it under a 20-year lease -
purchase agreement. A $42,000
investment in a workforce.de-
velopment program, under a
joint agreement with the local
school district, provides equip-
ment for training and retraining
workers.
§4B projects
Bay City. In its battle against a
high rate of illiteracy, the city con-
tracted with Literacy Volunteers of
America to conduct a literacy
training program. Other sales tax
money upgraded library and mu-
seum facilities. The city is hoping
upgraded baseball and softball
fields will meet local recreational
needs and attract tournaments to
town.
Cedar Hill. Sales tax revenues
paid for a 1,154-acre lakefront site
where an amphitheater, and base-
ball, soccer and softball fields will
be constructed. A $500,000 alloca-
tion improved the library and up-
graded parks.
Junction. Expenditures by vis-
iting hunters, many of whom fly
(Continued on next page)
Volume 12, Issue 2 City & County Financial Management
r4
Cities plan strategically for ,economic
development (cinitillue,)
to Junction, are important to the
local economy. §413 sales tax reve-
nues enabled the city to join with
the county and the Federal Avia-
tion Administration to enlarge the
airport runway to accommodate
corporate jets. The city also spon-
sors youth baseball activities to
attract regional baseball tourna-
ments.
La Feria. The city used sales
tax money to develop a sports
complex in a joint project with the
local school district.
North Richland Hills. The
city voters approved the tax in
August 1992 primarily to de-
velop parks and open space
land. With the school district,
the city used federal air quality
mitigation grants and sales tax
proceeds to provide 20 percent
of the funding to develop a 38-
acre athletic and recreation
park with 16 tennis courts,
baseball fields and a trail system.
Another $2 million, 30-acre park
project will include seven soccer
fields and a fishing pond. After a
feasibility study, plans for a mu-
nicipal swimming pool were
changed to construct a family wa-
ter park with §4B funds. It attract-
ed 180,000 people last year, with
61 percent of the visitors from
outside the city.
Tomball. Lack of fire protec-
tion discouraged growth in some
parts of town, so the city used 44B
funds to add firefighting equip-
ment. New sales tax projects in-
clude flood control, a new police
station and a fire station.
Use of the revenues
Many cities often ask what the
differences are between a §4A tax
and a §413 tax:
• A §4A tax is primarily intend-
ed for manufacturing and in-
dustrial development, and cit-
ies must use the tax revenues
to focus on these areas.
• A §413 tax provides cities with
a wider range of the use of the
tax revenues because it is in-
tended to give communities
an opportunity to undertake
projects to provide for quality
of life improvements, includ-
in: economic development.
Under §4A
Cities may use §4A sales tax
revenue to acquire land, buildings,
equipment. facilities and improve-
ments for purposes related to:
• manufacturing and industrial
facilities, recycling facilities,
distribution centers, small
warehouse facilities;
commercial development and
expansion in blighted or eco-
nomically depressed areas
and development areas (Refer
to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
5190.6 $2(10).):
a zeneral aviation business
service airport that is an inte-
gral part of an industrial park,
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6 §4A
(i)(0.); and
• port -related facilities to sup-
port waterborne commerce.
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6 §4A
0) (2).)
A corporation created under
§4A may not assume, or pay prin-
cipal or interest on, debts that ex-
isted before the city created the
corporation. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(q)•)
Under §4B
In addition to projects de-
fined in'Section 2 of the Act,
cities may use §413 revenues to
fund land acquisition, build-
ings, equipment, facilities and
improvements that the board of
directors determines to be re-
quired or suitable for:
• professional and amateur
sports (including children's
sports);
athletic, entertainment, tour-
ist, convention and public
park purposes and events, in-
cluding stadiums, ballparks,
auditoriums, amphitheaters,
concert halls, leaming cen-
ters, parks and open space
improvements;
municipal buildings, muse-
ums, exhibition facilities and
related store, restaurant, con-
cession, parking and transpor-
tation facilities, and
related street, water and sewer
facilities.
To promote and develop new
and expanded business enterprise,
a city may provide: .
• public safety facilities;
City & County Financial Management Volume 12, Issue 2
• recycling facilities;
• streets and roads:
• drainage and related improve-
ments;
• demolition of existing struc-
tures.
• general city -owned improve-
ments:
• maintenance and operating
costs associated with projects;
and
• any other project that the
board determines as contrib-
uting to the promotion or de-
velopment of new or expand-
ed business enterprise. (Refer
to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
5190.6 §§2(10), 411(a)(2),
413(a)(a-2).)
Before spending §4B sales tax
revenues, a corporation. is required
to hold at least one public hearing
on the proposed project. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4B(n).)
Eligibility for §4A
Upon voter approval, state law
allows a city located in a county
with a population of 500,000 or
less to impose the §4A tax if the
new combined local sales tax rate
would not exceed 2 percent and
the city is not part of a rapid tran-
sit authority.
A city with a population of less
than 50,000 may do so if:
• it is located within two or
more counties, one of which
has a population of 500,000
or more (which includes only
Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Har-
ris, Tarrant and Travis);
• it is located within the territo-
rial limits of the San Antonio
Area Rapid Transit Authority
(VIA) but has not elected to
become a part of the transit
authority, or
• it is located within the territo-
rial limits of the Dallas Area
Rapid Transit Authority
( DART) but has not elected to
become a part of DART; and
the new combined local sales
tax rate would not exceed 2
percent. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(a).)
Eligibility for §4B
A city may adopt the tax under
§46, with voter approval, if the
city:
• is eligible to adopt a sales tax
under §4A and the new com-
bined local sales tax rate
would not exceed 2 percent;
• is located in a county with a
population of 750,000 or
more and the combined sales
tax rate would not exceed
7.25 percent at the time of the
election;
• is located in Tarrant County
and the combined sales tax
rate would not exceed 7.75
percent at the time of the
election; or
• has a population of 400,000
or more, located in more than
one county, and the combined
sales tax rate would not ex-
ceed 8.25 percent. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
5190.6 §411(a)(l).)
Calling for an election
An eligible city may hold an
election on the tax after its gov-
erning body adopts an ordinance
calling for the election. An ordi-
nance to hold an election to adopt
the tax is initiated in one of two
ways: upon a majority vote of the
governing body's members, or by
a petition of at least 20 percent of
the votes cast in the most recent
regular municipal election. (Refer
to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.401(a), (b), (c).)
The city's governing body must
adopt an ordinance calling for the.
election at least 45 days before the
election. The election must be
held on one of the uniform elec-
tion dates according to V.T.C.A.,
Election Code §41.001:
• the third Saturday in January:
• the first Saturday in May;
• the second Saturday in Au-
gust; or
• the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November. Note:
According to V.T.C.A., Elec-
tion Code §41.003. cities can-
not hold a November election
in even -numbered years.
If a city already imposes a tax
under this Act, it may call an elec-
tion to increase or reduce the tax
rate. Procedures for tax rate
changes are not specifically ad-
dressed under §4B.
The ordinance to hold an -elec-
tion to change the tax rate is initi-
ated in one of two ways: by a ma-
jority vote of the governing body
or by a petition of the registered
voters. §4A and §4B differ in the
percentage of registered voters
required for this petition: §4A
requires signatures of 10 percent
or more of the registered voters,
and §4B requires signatures of at
least 20 percent of the votes cast
in the most recent regular election.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
5190.6 §4AM; V.T.C.A., Tax
Code §321.401(c).)
If a petition initiates the election
to adopt or to change the rate of
the tax, the governing body must
determine if the petition is suffi-
cient within 30 days of receiving
it. If the petition meets the legal
requirements, the city must adopt
the ordinance calling for the elec-
tion within 60 days after receiving
it. (Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§321.402.)
As with adoption, the sales and
use tax must be increased or de-
creased in increments of and
must be a minimum of up to a
maximum of percent. However,
(Continued on next page)
Volume 12, Issue 2 City & County Financial Management
14
Cities plan strategically for economic
development (continued)
a city cannot adopt a tax rate that
would result in a combined rate of
all local sales and use taxes ex-
ceeding 2 percent. (Refer to Ver-
non's Ann.Civ.St. art 5190.6
§4A(d) and V.T.C.A.. Tax Code
§321.101(f).)
Repealing the tax,
duration of the tax
Under §4A, a city may call an
election to repeal the tax in the
same way as an election to change
the tax rate. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6 §4A(k).)
The law does not specify a proce-
dure for repealing the §4B tax.
However, §4B(i) states that a city
may not collect a sales and use tax
imposed under this section after
the last day of the first calendar
quarter occurring after the eco-
nomic development corporation
has notified the Comptroller's of-
fice that all bonds or other corpo-
ration debts have been satisfied.
Under §4A, a tax approved
without a limit on its duration or a
tax designated for a specific
project remains in effect until re-
pealed by an election: A tax im-
posed for a specified period ex-
pires at the end of that period. A
tax for a specific project expires
after all debts related to the
project and obligations from the
tax proceeds have been paid in
full.
A city imposing a tax for a spe-
cific period may not extend the
tax period or reimpose the tax af-
ter its expiration date. But a tax
imposed for a specific project may
be reimposed by an election. (Re-
fer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
5190.6 PAW, (n), (r).)
Under §4B, the statutes do not
provide for a city to limit imposi-
tion of the tax to a specified time
period. The tax remains in effect
City & County Financial Management
until all bonds or other debts have
been satisfied. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6 §4B(i).)
Ballot information
If a city wants to hold an elec-
tion to reduce or abolish its §4A
tax and adopt a sales tax under
§4B, the city must address the two
issues as separate ballot proposi-
tions. If a city wants to adopt a
sales tax under §4B and a tax to
reduce,the property tax rate in the
same election, it must also address
them .as two separate propositions.
(Refer to AG -OP DM-218 and
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4B(e).)
When preparing for the election,
the city must print the ballot so
that it allows voters to choose for
or against the proposition. The
Act provides specific ballot lan-
guage in §4A, but not in §4B.
Ballot wording under §4A
Following is ballot language
under §4A:
1. For a city to adopt, increase
or reduce the tax, the ballot
should state:
The adoption of a sales qnd
use tax for the promotion and
development of new and ex-
panded business enterprises
at the rate of of
one percent.
(Insert one -eighth, one -quar-
ter, three -eighths, or one-half
as appropriate.) (Refer to Ver-
non's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(m).)
2. For a city to repeal the tax,
the ballot should state:
Dissolution of the
(name of the corporation).
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(k).)
3. A city may also allow the vot-
ers to vote on a ballot propo-
sition limiting the length of
time a sales and use tax may
be imposed. The following
language should be added to
#1:
to be imposed for years.
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(n).)
4. A city.may hold an election to
adopt, increase, reduce or re-
peal the 4A sales tax and the
sales tax to reduce property
tax on the same ballot. If so,
the ballot should state:
The adoption of a sales and
use tax within the cityfor the
promotion and development
of new and expanded business
enterprises at the rate of
of one percent
and the adoption of an addi-
tional sales and use tax within
the city at a rate of
of one percent to
be used to reduce the property
tar rate.
(Insert one -eighth, one -quar-
ter, three -eighths, or one-half
in each space as appropriate.)
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(p).)
5. A city may indicate a specific
project on the ballot that the
sales tax revenue will fund by
inserting the name of the spe-
cific project in place of the
Volume 12, Issue 2
"new and expanded business
enterprises" ballot language
found in W.
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A(r).)
Ballot wording under §413
The Development Corporation
Act does not provide specific bal-
lot language for §4B. City offi-
cials should consult with their city
attorneys when drafting the ballot
language under this section.
Atter voter approval ana proper
notification to the Comptroller's
office, a complete calendar quarter
7
Q
must elapse for the tax change to
become effective on the first day
of the next calendar quarter. (Re-
fer to V.T.C.A.. Tax Code
§321.102(a).)
If a city adopts a §4B sales tax
and a sales tax for property tax
relief in the same election, a com-
plete calendar quarter must elapse
after the city notifies the Comp-
troller for both taxes to become
effective the following October 1.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann. Civ. St.
art. 5190.6 §4B(f) and V.T.C.A.,
Tax Code § 321.102(b).)
.oller's office will
nt for the total city
r explaining how to
ate change portion,
sent with the first
r a city receives the
'= tax reve-
U
ptroller's office, it
he revenues to the
elopment corpora -
of election
lity must wait one
aling
an election con-
y
ut before holding
m
an to authorize, in -
se or abolish the tax.
Q
ton's Ann. Civ. St.
m
4A(e), 413(d) and
Code §321.406.)
U
n
anu ouaru of directors
The Development Corporation
Act of 1979 requires a city to es-
tablish a corporation to administer
§4A and §413 sales and use tax
funds. The corporation must file
articles of incorporation with the
Secretary of State. The articles of
incorporation must state that the
corporation is governed under
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§4A or §4B of the Development
Corporation Act of 1979.
The composition of the corpora-
tion's board of directors and the
length of the members' terms dif-
fer between §4A and §4B. Under
§4A, a city's governing body must
appoint a five -member board. All
members are appointed up to a
six -year term. Under §4B, the
city's governing body must ap-
point a seven -member board.
Three of the seven directors can-
not be employees, officers or
members of the city's governing
body. The other four members
may be —but are not required to
=members of the governing
body. All members are ap-
pointed to a two-year term
under §4B and must be resi-
dents of the city authorizing
the sales tax.
The board of directors autho-
rized under §4A and §411 serves at
the pleasure of the governing body
and must conduct meetings within
the city's boundaries.
Other legal requirements for
both §4A and §4B:
• a corporation's registered
agent must be a Texas resi-
dent,
the corporation's registered
office must be within the
city's boundaries.
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 5190.6
§§4A(c), 413(c).)
For more information
For more information on the
economic development sales tax,
please call the Local Assistance
Division at 1-800-531-5441, ext.
3-4679. ■
Volume 12, Issue 2 City & County Financial Management
C1
Districts form to control crime
A
14
Recognizing the urgency
from local governments to
stablish a way to proac-
tively combat and control crime,
the Legislature enacted the Crime
Control and Prevention District
Act in 1989. This Act allows cit-
ies and counties to establish a dis-
trict and impose a local sales tax
to fund its programs. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4
§3.01.)
When the law governing these
types of districts was enacted,
only one county qualified to
create a district. The Legisla-
ture later determined that medi-
um-sized urban
areas needed ad-
ditional revenue to
set up crime pre-
vention and rehabilitation
programs. (Refer to Ver-
non's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-
4, §§ 1.02, 1.03.)
Since 1989, legislative
changes have extended eligi-
bility for creating and funding
a crime control and prevention
district to include other counties,
more areas within counties and a
few cities in large counties. (Re-
fer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §§3.01, 1.05, 1.05A.) On
October 1, 1995, the City of Fort
Worth began collecting a'/2 per-
cent local sales and use tax city-
wide to fund the first district es-
tablished under this law. Six other
cities have followed with elections
to form a crime control district
and to levy the tax: the City of
Hurst, the City of Haltom City, the
City of Euless, the City of White
Settlement, City of North Rich-
land Hills and the City of Wa-
tauga.
Eligible counties and cities may
want to consider the various pro-
grams and projects to see if they
Volume 12, Issue 2
would benefit from a crime con-
trol district and the programs that
the district tax can fund.
Eligibility
County commissioners in a
county with a population of more
than 130,000 may propose a crime
control and prevention district and
the local sales tax to fund the dis-
trict if the new combined local
sales tax rate would not exceed
2 percent. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.SL art. 2370c-4
§§ 1.05, 3.03(c).) County
commis-
�:.L1tN •sioners
�J may cre-
ate a dis-
trict com-
prised of a
whole county
or part of the
Lcounty, but a
district
may not
include more than one county.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 § 1.06.)
Twenty-two counties meet this
criteria: Bell, Bexar, Brazoria,
Cameron, Collin, Dallas,'Denton,
El Paso, Fort Bend, Galveston,
Harris, Hidalgo, Jefferson, Lub-
bock, McLennan, Montgomery,
Nueces, Smith, Tarrant, Travis,
Webb and Williamson.
A city's governing body may
also propose its own crime control
and prevention district if the mu-
nicipality is located, wholly or
partially, within a county with a
population of more than 1 million
and the combined local tax rate
would not exceed 2 percent.
Therefore, cities in Bexar, Dallas,
Hams and Tarrant counties may
be eligible. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4 §§1.05A,
3.03(c).)
Appointment of a
temporary board
The governing body of a city or
a county proposing the district
must appoint a seven -member,
temporary board of directors with-
in 60 days of the district proposal.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §§2.01, 2.03.) The tem-
porary board must create and ap-
prove a two-year crime control
plan and a two-year budget plan.
The crime control plan must out-
line the strategies for the district
and include a method for evaluat-
ing the effectiveness of the strate-
gies. The budget plan must state
the amount of money budgeted for
each strategy, a percentage to-
wards administrative costs and an
estimate of the required tax rate.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §3.09.)
Calling for an election
After a majority of the tempo-
rary board members approve the
two plans, the board may order an
election to create the district and
approve the sales tax. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4
§3.02 and V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§323.105(a).) The proposing city
or the county must hold the elec-
tion between 35 and 60 days after
the date the election is ordered.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §3.05.) A majority of
district voters must approve the
creation of the district and adopt
the sales and use tax to fund the
district at an election held specifi-
cally for that purpose. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art 2370c-4
§3.01.)
The temporary board must give
notice of the creation election by
publishing substantial copy of the
election order in a newspaper of
(Continued on next page)
City & County Financial Management
14
A
Districts form to control crime (continued)
general circulation once a week
for two weeks. The first notice
must appear at least 35 days be-
fore the election date. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4
§3.04.)
Voters may adopt the tax at rates
of or'h percent. (Refer to Ver-
non's Ann.Civ.St. art 2370c-4
§3.03(b).) After a tax is in place,
the board of directors may de-
crease it through an order by'/+
percent. The tax may also be in-
creased in increments of up to
'h percent by an order of the
board if approved by a majority
of qualified voters at an election
called by the board to increase the
rate. (Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§323.105(b).)
If the temporary board does not
create a district within five years
from the date it was proposed, the
board is dissolved on that date and
a district may not be created. (Re-
fer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §3.08.)
Ballot wording
When preparing for a creation
election, a city or a county must
print the ballot to allow the voters
the choice of voting for or against
the proposition. Following is the
ballot language for counties re-
quired by law. Substitute "city" in
place of "county" where appropri-
ate.
1. To create a district, the ballot
should state:
The creation of the
County Crime Control and
Prevention District dedicated
to crime reduction programs
and the adoption of a pro-
posed local sales and use tax
at a rate of (the rate
specified in the election or-
der).
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
art. 2370c-4 §3.06.)
City & County Financial Management
2. To increase the rate of the
tax, the ballot should state:
The increase of the
County Crime Control and
Prevention District sales and
use tax rate to percent.
(Refer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§323.105(b).)
Notification to the
Comptroller of the election
results
The temporary board must can-
vass the election returns between
two and 13 days after the day of
the creation election. (Refer to
Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4
§3.07.)
If the voters approve the district
and the sales tax, the governing
body of the city or the county
must appoint the district's board
of directors who will manage and
administer the district's funds.
The district board members are
appointed in the same way as the
temporary directors under §2.01
of the Act and serve staggered
two-year terms that expire Sep-
tember 1. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4 §§4.01,
5.02.)
Within 10 days after an election,
the governing body must enter the
resolution declaring the results
into its minutes. The resolution or
the ordinance must include:
1. the date of the election;
2. the proposition on which the
vote was held;
3. the total number of votes cast
for and against the proposi-
tion; and
4. the number of votes by which
the proposition was approved.
If the election results change the
application of the tax, the law
states that the county judge or the
city secretary should send a certi-
fied copy of the resolution or the
ordinance to the State Comptrol-
ler's office. The law states that
the county judge or the city secre-
tary should send this through U.S.
certified or registered mail. (Re-
fer to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§§323.102(c), 323.105, 323.405.)
After voter approval of the tax
adoption and proper notification
to the Comptroller, one complete
calendar quarter must elapse for
the sales tax to become effective
the first day of the following cal-
endar quarter. (Refer to V.T.C.A.,
Tax Code §§323.102(c), 323.105.)
In the event of a tax increase or
a decrease, the board must also
notify the Comptroller's office.
One complete calendar quarter
must elapse after the Comptroller
receives notice for the new tax
rate to take effect on the first day
of the next calendar year. (Refer
to V.T.C.A., Tax Code
§323.105(b).) If a district is not
composed of the whole county, the
county must remit the district's
revenue to the district. If a district
is composed of the whole county,
the county is responsible for dis-
tributing the portion of the county
sales and use tax received that is
to be used to finance the district's
operations to the district. (Refer
to V.T.C.A., Tax Code §323.105.)
Frequency of an election
If a district holds this sales tax
election, the district must wait a
full year before it can hold another
election under this chapter. (Refer
to V.T.C.A., Tax Code §323.406.)
Use of the revenues
Money may be spent only for
items included in an annual bud-
get or an amendment to it. (Refer
to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §6.07.) A crime control
and prevention district may spon,
sor programs that include, but are
not limited to, the following:
1. police and law enforcement
related programs, including:
Volume 12, Issue 2
14
A
• a multijurisdiction crime
analysis center;
• mobilized crime analysis
units;
• countywide crime stoppers
telephone lines;
• united property -marking
programs;
• home security inspection
programs;
• an automated fingerprint
analysis center;
• a computerized criminal
history system;
• a drug and chemical disposal
center; and
• a regional law enforcement
training center.
2. community -related crime pre-
vention strategies, including:
• block watch programs;
• school -police programs;
• senior citizen anti -crime
networks;
• citizen crime -reporting
projects;
• home alert programs;
• a police -community coopera-
tion program;
• a radio alert program; and
• ride along programs.
3. specific treatment and pre-
vention programs, including:
• positive peer group interac-
tion programs;
• drug and alcohol awareness
programs;
• countywide family violence
centers;
• work incentive programs;
• social learning centers;
• transitional aid centers and
pre -parole centers;
• social development centers;
• street gang intervention
centers:
• predelinquency intervention
centers.
• school relations bureaus;
• integrated community educa-
tion systems;
• probation subsidy programs;
• Juvenile Offenders Learn
Truth (JOLT) programs;
Volume 12, Issue 2
• reformatory visitation
programs;
• juvenile awareness programs;
• shock probation;
• community restitution
programs;
• electronic monitoring
programs;
• at home arrest;
• victim restitution programs;
• additional probation officers;
and
• additional parole officers.
4. court and prosecution
services, including:
• court watch programs;
• community arbitration and
mediation centers;
• night prosecutors programs;
• automated legal research
systems;
• an automated court rnanage-
ment system;
• a criminal court administra-
tor;
• an automated court reporting
system;
• additional district courts;
• additional prosecutors and
staff; and
• additional jails and guards.
(Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4
§5.01(a).)
Continuing a district,
dissolving a district and
abolishing the tax * .
Five years after a district is cre-
ated or three years after the last
continuation or dissolution refer-
endum, the board may order a ref-
erendum on whether to continue
or dissolve the district. The board
may initiate an order for the refer-
endum in two ways: either by a
majority vote of the board mem-
bers or by petition of signatures
equal to 5 percent of the number
of votes cast in the county for all
candidates for governor in the
most recent gubernatorial election.
If the petition is sufficient, the
board shall order a referendum
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art.
2370c-4 §§8.01(a),.(b), 8.07; 8.10;
9.01(a), (b); 9.07; 9.10.) The dis-
trict should print the ballot to al-
low voters the choice of voting for
or against the proposition. Fol-
lowing is the ballot language re-
quired by law:
1. To continue a district and the
sales tax, the ballot should
state:
Whether the
County Crime Control and
Prevention District should be
continued and the crime con-
trol and prevention district
sales and use tax should be
continued
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
art. 2370c-4 §8.01(c).)
2. To dissolve a district and
abolish the sales tax, the bal-
lot should state:
Whether the
County Crime Control and
Prevention District should be
dissolved and the crime con-
trol and prevention district
sales and use tax should be
abolished.
(Refer to Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
art. 2370c-4 §9.01(c).)
If a district does not hold a con-
tinuation or dissolution referen-
dum, the district is dissolved five
years after its creation date or five
years after the last continuation or
referendum date. (Refer to Ver-
non's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c4
§ 10.01(a), (b).) If a district is dis-
solved, it must transfer land and
building titles, operating funds
and reserves, and levied taxes to
the county and cities in the dis-
trict. (Refer to Vernon's
Ann.Civ.St. art. 2370c-4 § 10.02.)
For more information
For more information, call the
Local Assistance Division at
1-800-531-5441, ext. 3-4679. ■
City & County Financial Management
AUGUST SOWHLAKE MUtSON S.L.H.P. IMAGE TOTAL.
1 _ 4,760,000 1,219AN 6,1it,000
2 $4 0,000 11A37AQ 6,117A00
3 6,Os0A00 1,4311W0 7,511'000
4 1~0 7 ,000
6 61920,000 1,563,000 1,473,000
6 61160,000 IA41,000 71901,000
7 " 9,t001000 1,430AW s,230,ON � Note -On this dais Grapevine use
t 6.760AW 11,164.000 6,904JIM totaled 226,000 gallons.
9 6,780A00 1At6A00 — 6,m w
10 6,1110A00 1,120A00 6,160,000
11 6,3i0,000 1At7A00 6,637,000
14 927A00 612071000
13 spopc 152sAG0 7,026,000
14 ^ 6,"D,m 1,198A00 6,9W,000
15 60000 1,306A00 7.294M _
16 CAi0,000 9601000 6,0001M
17 3,210A00 771A00 3,9ts,000
1s 3,220A00 IAAt,400 4AM
1s 4,670,000 lAW9 m tt,f79A00
20 1,1011M 6,2t1A00
21 6„t20 117
22 4,260,000 913,000 5,173A00
23 3,230,tl00 796,000 4A26.M
24 4,100,M 1,032,000 6.212,000
26 3,160,006 792,000 3A42AW
26� 21MIM 78 ON 3 WZA00
27 21K000 734MO
28 1167000 607A00 � 24177,000
29 0
30 0
31 0
TOTALS 134,320A00 WM2,000 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
DAILY WATER USAGE
10
8-
4-
2
0
DAY OF MONTH
On August 7, 1996 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. we furnished water to the City of Grapevine through
the connection at Hwy 114 and industrial Blvd. The amount was 226,000 gallons. With the vatve
fully open the average flow was 750 GPM.
TOTAL P.02
v�
N
00
NEWS CLIPPING
[Source: ft • VO+h S ay T4,ltq m m iDate: 4611 a196
NEWS CLIPPING
Frce: 57,e V f n t S u n Date:
u
A
NEWS CLIPPING
N Source: �-• WOASpar . l , If-q YA M I Date: .71 1 q / 44i I
Southlake
aims to hold
its tax rate,
officials say
BY LESLIE HUEHOLT
Star -Telegram Staff Writer
SOUTHLAKE — The City
Council is considering adding 12
employees to the city's Depar�tmeni I:
of Public Safety and purchasing
thousands of dollars in equipment
— all without having to raise 'city
property taxes.
Thanks to increased revenue
from business, and housing growth j
and rising property values, the city
is expected to have enough money
to maintain its tax rate of 42 cents
per $100 of assessed property
value. j
The council and city staff are
scheduled to meet at 4 p.m. today
to review a proposed 1996-1997
budget. After a public hearing : at `;.
6 p.m. tomorrow, the council is ei-
pected to take a preliminary
on the budget.
} If the proposed budget is adopt-
ed, the owner of a $100,000 home
will pay $422 in city property taxes
next year, the same as this year.
"I think we will either maintain
or lower the tax rate," Mayor Rick
Stacy said Saturday.
The budget's general fund is ex-
pected to increase by about $2 mil-
lion, bringing it to $10.6 million, be-
cause of additional revenue coming
into the city.
But even with the extra income,
city officials are considering issuing
bonds nexi year for up to $2 million
in road improvements in the next
five years. '
"We have several miles of roads
that need work," Stacy said.
City officials could set a bond
election for roads -and other
projects in the spring or fall, Stacy
said.
Right now, though, public safety
is a top priority, officials said.
The council is considering adding
seven police jobs and four fire de-_
partment positions in the 1996-97
budget, plus an estimated $300,000
for five police cars and other police.
and fire equipment, said Lou Ann.':
Heath, the city's finance director.
The city has 24 officers, including
police and fire personnel, said Rob.-
ert Finn, Department of Public"
Safety spokesman.
"We're having a lot more calls
for service, and we're pretty much
(More on SOUTHLAKE on Page 4)
OVZr
T
Southia, ke.
From Page 1
not, able to handle all , the calls,"
Finn said. ' Ve're . starting to have,
to rely on neighboring cities."
I'llz Stacy said he •'Support a tpdve
t io lore additional pubH4� , `
dicers, bit not 'in. `ot "�''
if hef city.de.
iartments`'
In the past two years' the member
of city employees has increased
50 percent to more than 150, and I
that's plenty for now, the mayor
said.
It
R
r
Source:
A
NEWS CLIPPING
f,vlM,Suh
Date:
Metroportl
group sets
priorities
By Deborah HendaII
Staff Writer
Trophy Club — The Metro -
port Cities Partnership began
to prioritize a legislative agenda
on Thursday by distributing
forms to address members' needs
to state lawmakers in January.
The presented issues will be
discussed Sept.19 at the Roanoke
City Hall.
State Sen. Jane Nelson (R-
Flower Mound) urged the part-
nership to pursue the State
Highway 114 issue.
"I hope local bills will emerge
from what you are doing here
today," said Nelson. "Unfortu-
nately, I've learned the high-
way construction tends to be
`keep up,' rather than antici-
Ihope local bills will
emergefrom W' I* u
are doing here today.'
s
State Senator
Jane Nelson
pated, but the commissioners;
know this is a current problem.'
Nelson suggested that more
visuals, such as videos of,'th
congestion of State Highway 114,
be made and presented to the
Legislature.
"I think general growth con
See 114/3A
f
114
Fromh A
cerns — long use, zoning and
balancing development with
single-family growth is some-
thing that affects all of us," said
Trent Petty, Grapevine city
manager. "Hundreds of other
issues come from that, but
Metroport is uniquely suited
deal with these issues., If we
Working together, we can be
address these issues." r}
AS FOR immediate plans,'the,
Metroport Cities - Colleyville,
Grapevine, Keller, Roanoke,
Southlake, Trophy Club, and
Westlake — plan to oppose any
bill that promotes taking away
state highway money from one
project to give to another.
"We need to keep our moneq�;
in our area," said Colleyville,
Mayor Ed Baker, the chairman
of the Metroport Cities Board.. ,
"We need to zero in, have 'a strong'I
legislative committee, and come
up with ideas that will flourish."
"TIE INTERSECTIONS of
1709 and 114 (in Southlake) and-
114 and William D. Tate (in -+
Grapevine) are crucial intersec-,C
tions — we can't let up on it," ,4'
concluded Petty.
PC
It
P]
A
$V:
A_�� slip O
e�,g,Qa,_•gm a2A gyp.
O� a. 'J•'J' m p 7 �$ 7
AC3 amo
C 00 7= �•� s � G. �P 6 s�
ICI:
m O
a: •
7' m UH U191.
�71cr
o
=gip �"�s10�.a
&411. �.�futok
n s �,
�+ g
'0$a'�' m°'f3.a°°='cr
g'�-.B..•s.tiro m
grels�pp � �•���p'��+mc
� �' p01, ap sr
Mgr a 6R m.6
0� m eta �t avr spas
iss$�a9mmamgpd8.
�m•�` ��b p Abe
ga.
on 3.o r
�A A w � a S�'ao•o � o'
�rm t asa m m w� w
O
CA
v
V
NEWS CLIPPING
(W I Source: FtW
0
YAM
Date: a I a a
Cross -dressing secret drove
man to kill, prosecutor says
BY 1)oMINGo RAMIREZ JR. '
anne Breder yesterday in a telephone inter -
Star -Telegram Staff Writer
-view from New Jersey. "She was the one
SOUTHLAKE = Rather than risk his
who cared about him."
wife revealing during an impending divorce
Yesterday, Terence O'Regan pleaded
case his penchant for cross -dressing, Terence .
guilty to a charge of murder.
O'Regan stabbed her to'death and stuffed
her body into a clpset in their Southlake
,
O. Regan, 48, is scheduled to be sentenced
home, a prosecutor said yesterday.
today*-to,30 years in priso6 at,*U
Criminal District Court No 213 m: °ForT
But Lori O'Regan's sister — whose con-
Worth. He -will be eligible for parole in about
cerns led police to find the body in October
15 years, court officials said.
1994 — says her sibling never planned to ex-
prosecutors delayed sentencing so that
pose her husband's predilection.
Lori O'Regan's out-of-state family members
"She even tried to get him help," said Di-
(More on UREGAN on Page 17)
�u
Terence j
O'Regan pleads
guilty to killing'
his wife.
over --lor
OR egan
From Page 1
could attend. Terence O'Regan,
whorhas been in the Tarrant Coun-
ty Jail with bail set at $150,000 since
his'arrest, could not be reached for
comment. His attorney, Tom Hill
of Fort Worth, declined to com-
ment yesterday.
The plea bargain came five days
before O'Regan's murder trial was
to begin. Less than a week ago, he
turned down the same deal, at-
torneyssaid.
Lead prosecutor Terri Moore
said she believes that O'Regan fi-
nally agreed to the plea because he
feared his cross -dressing would be
discussed in the trial.
"She decided to divorce him be-
cause she was tired of coming home
every day and finding him dressed
as a fat woman," Moore said.
'Part of the evidence confiscated
by Southlake detectives included
photographs of Terence O'Regan
dressed in women's clothing, au-
thorities said.
Breder said news of the guilty
plea was a relief for family mem-
bers.
"I'm glad he did it, so we
w.ouldn't have to be put through a
_trial," Breder said.
.v'••z
The couple had a history of mari-
tal problems, Southlake Detective
Sgt. Charles Ward said. They had
planned to divorce in 1994 after
five years of marriage. But for sev-
eral weeks before her death, Lori
O'Regan tried to work out differ-
ences, police and family member
said.
The couple had lived in ,an ex-
pensive home in Southlake for
about two years. Lori O'Regan, a
34-year-old information technol-
ogy supervisor, had worked at Cap -
Gemini America.in Dallas, where
she was named consultant of the
year in 1992.
Terence O'Regan was self-
employed as an independent com-
puter consultant. His firm, the
Dreadnought Works Inc., did busi-
ness with several companies in the
Tarrant County area, detectives
said.
Southlake detectives said they
believe Lori O'Regan was asleep
when the bloody attack began but
awoke and fought her attacker.
Blood was splattered throughout
the bedroom, authorities said.
After she was killed, her body
was wrapped in black plastic gar-
bage bags, a shower curtain and a
comforter, and stuffed into a plastic
storage box and placed in a closet,
police said.
Terence O'Regan fled to Florida,
where authorities arrested him
Lori O'Regan: Was slain by I
husband in October 1994 j
after O'Regan's brother reported
that he was in a Key West motel
and was threatening to commit sui-
cide.
In the meantime, Ben Whiteker;
Lori O'Regan's 17-year-old son by
a previous marriage, remained in
the house for two days unaware of'.
his mother's death. .
Southlake police found the body
Oct. 7 after Breder called them to ,
say that she couldn't reach her sis-
ter by telephone and that she
hadn't been to work that day. a;
"There are not any words to de-,i
scribe the loss," Breder said yester-'
day. "He is the evil in this world,">:
,: r
NE
P]
Source: Grlrapsvlf& Su %. I Date: V / 7
i
G t;
Pkg¢Y� Va` xg .* i11i''w (.j, 91 �itd ft ,Sltla 1.,1 1 )fl-` 911{ SiYrl 1 !( ' 1 it fY1:'1 aA tYPlld
'�n��� ale _ .,...- e4 • ^1 ,- , F i •: .. _ x
2 d
yy ygi.
�I 41 Yi ��llS I�1:. ., fdi��r'r d.,, �_d �,i,il a-� riil. �f ..� 3!-u,• �d I.
�
All
'.. ,,. Ix1.11�
A �
i
i
d) I�f:i1 ily� '.}y,i .}h ♦_�t(... Pa�.j .. :f _ t 3tl111'
�'AI y =�' g'�.' •'J'Y:i7r,liY"S i'i �. `�G �3�li i`�Itr a 1 � �l i,s :,lll „ .. 1 +
/�i �Il t�`, /Ili:jXlfxrlifi�l'.iilzC 11 �,' lysy >art�
i€}'J 96
1 etlt:fl ilk �r�xElY Ii l f l• ' I /i:'Si } a e� t y� t �i:
jTC
All.
All
Z
fml� Owe
rr
�✓
FMIIL
' a
y
r
n
A
�f
j
i
j
I
M
-
i
t.yy
V
f
1
M
a
w
_
i.
LA
n O 'q 2. A
'�' F W > @
(IQ to :S
O< H w O g g H
:� f. w 3 c< 5
o a
a �• n' ° o c
R.
p•
^
p O a a
^ C O
° Cl.vAi a a. co a
�•i Fo
n °c "MR d A c oo ii
°o a.
to
A
7F' y�•
coo
"d A °�
'~ O r .0 Co
O
p
M
6 O
$'p�
=,
l7c�o o
oCo�
G.a ypnw
Ica,
p.��
C�
R.
p
co,co
A
0 y
p, O
� ►� t
.co IV
° o
a. a
C
< a.
to
to
a
A.
c9 fo G
0 Co
^ O O ...
OQ
(C ti C-. ..En
w
g
y ...
a
p�
�. r. cm;
O a a'
.»
m A p a•
(IQ CD
co
O . *
p' w a<i v C O m A co5 o co a cto A OC Q'
co o ..� "Q
� cso co p. a co
s crto WC, CD CD
co
C ��-. a te 0 =, x
En on
»�^ca rA ro o a� d
° p V fA ^ a D y Er a.co co
cCo c y E 'r1 oo CD
EL -
co c s to
�
y w Co N y A �< M .yy . p+ i ' �< vi
�� no �� go•y ac Imo•'
Er El a c
Avpli :E A co y N '�C O�.
N
o °oo a
rjQ �p � ?
^
a gC.) f9 EI b y oco
-
�co 0 t O
co
a
N a A
a a.5'o `o a'w
d
f0
° Vl
ao
o
2
E;
rr
y H �
M �
•O
g 'o
cp�
aaCA
lom b
D2; o w<
O � C3' '" p �' O ►°�+ N p
OR Cb
o A A y o a r Co. 0. A o ►+' a CL 0.
b
O N �' ry' vi .+ E 6 O 'O .y ,►�j' pt (�
O ... y c O O- A OQ q
tom` co - H p O acp crco
c<o O
D! ^' cD H C O OQ A `0
0, y O �ys = b ° N O "� O p CCD O . r "O
A C 8o94 I*° rn R. /m-► are C a, co
►� C O 9 < p: cac� Q. nrJ O ra — Oo
q w N VJ .O O A' O O < .,. '+• A F• A m
O o c9 co 'ts co Es' .7 ° CD
D A
• . + 7' .+ O r. O. CD coAO. a. A CY .
O n co cC,
CD rn to ° O I ,OAS, . o ° � a re-:
(IQ rA O
OQ.CD
Q: N
."T• N M
A
OQ `° N CD R.
O a o
o'a .74 ° y
IC
It
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: DQ t has M b )r n 1 hQ W ws
SAT scores
improve
across area--. .
By Laurie Wilson
Stull Writer of The Dallas Morning News
Northeast Tarrant County school
districts showed continued im, '
provement on the Scholastic A9sesiF
went -Test this year, with severo-
districts again performing above
the national and state averages, and; _
increasing their overall scores. _ 1
The Carroll school district,
which improved its scorns by{as
average 24 points from last year,
surpassed the Grapevine -Colley?
vine school district for the AM;
time in several years as the higheah-i ;
scoring district in the area. Thu.
average Carron score was 1,072.
Carroll High School students
scored an average S38 on the'mkh
portion of the test and S34 on the
verbal portion. The district's over-
all average last year was 1,048. ' , ' -
"The College Board gives you"a
reasonable idea of how much yoWra j
expected to improve from year to
year, and we're off the charts,P-m9 ..
Mike Murphy, assistant superiafel1,
dent for curriculum and iristt`w
tiou for the Carron school diOr'1f
"We made 18-point growth .in
math alone. I think our added elad-_
phasis on math shows up here. And
we haven't yet seen the benefit't►f
the work we've done recently'** ;
our younger students.
"These scores look -really good'
for us." , . I
Grapevine-Colleyville students.
also increased their overall scdz*
from last year. Students at
Please see STUDENTS on Pal*
over --v
Students show
SAT gains in
some schools
Continued from Page in.
vine High School scored 533 on the
math portion and 536 on the verbal.
The district's overall score, 1,069, is
five points higher than last year.
"We were afraid that we'd
peaked last year," said Dr. Jim
Thompson, Grapevine-Colleyville
superintendent, noting that two
students in the district achieved
perfect scores last year.
"Despite record scores last year,
we've done well again. We're very
pleased with the continued im-
provement."
Officials in the Northwest school
district said that although their
overall scores are not the highest in
the area, that district's overall aver-
age improved by 33 points from last
year.
The average score on the math.
portion was 503. The average verbal_
score was 518. The district average,
1,021, outpaces last year's overall
average score, 988.
Eileen Standridge, assistant su-
perintendent for curriculum in the
Northwest district, said that an in-
creased emphasis on testing ac-
counted for the increase in scores.
Unlike the Texas Assessment of
Basic Skills, the SAT is a voluntary
exam. The test is used by many col-
leges and universities to evaluate
prospective students and award
scholarships.
The test results this year are
based on a revamped scoring Sys•
tern that was designed to increase
the average score os each section to.
500.
Since the test was first adminis-
tered in 1941, the ethnic and eco.
nomic backgrounds of students
have. broadened. Previously, the.
test Was taken primarily by wealthi
er students at elite private schools
who were planning to attend `uni
versities. Now, most students.wha'
take the test attend public second:
ary schools.
The yearly comparisons by the.
College Board, the organization
UM administers the test, have been
cdaverted to reflect the new scor-
ing system.
-The national average was i,013,
up three points from last year. -The.
state average was 995, down one
pdint from last year.
;Students in'the HEB district
proved their scores by four poinf
over last year's district average
The district's, four high schools
a4eraged a score of 534 on the math
i portion and 516 on the verbal por!
tion. The district average, 1,050, is
four points above the converted
score of 1,046 from last year.
IC
It
PI
Group
-from pogo 1 w .
Princeton Kgd0cello ,i;s.
tates, the Dills of :Monticello;
Southlake Hills, Chimney Hill,
Air Park Estates$ Country Walk,.
Continental Park Estates and oth-
ers.
All residen,, these nei
Hoods are encotiri`turaged to nod;
the meeting to earn mjor tF
SPIN,1andzto,take. ac
in the. selection of the s 8
committee representativesi,'�
For more. informatia11
Shana Yelverton at 481e55,$,1,, j
Ext. 705.
E
l�7
a
A t
O CD o
` +c 0' A w
CD : 0
3r,, A 7d
"1 CIMLC3
6
O c QUO p n CT3 CD .+
CD ��333c5 y .
_ CD to CD O X
cr
I�
W
� 5
ztr
y � r eL
0
r•. �' ~' d cr �• N
s
a°a Pew -- o„ W
1
O i A N fD
Cc: WO os
CA `
(DDq° ICEs
aQ .' CO
OQ
S m CDy a.
CDC w
CD NCO^ J
co
O fD � .• OQ 'fD.. C d0
A = o
� H
z� cD3��aoc", � -
Cr7
.b O (DnT OQQ =1
CD
Vi
A Q O n 0 O
r-
c
A
id
W
V -
a° f
C-10
O
$ a
C-^' qQ
O
y c o n m = w OCL
eb
aa
'Ne SO m
o
cD � o0 o bC1•
o
cD "t _ •J O' y y' ny OC O
a• S �• n f�D ^ ~ ° n a O N 0 � � -fie co C
] , n� a 0 � .+' •yam Oy
o ''ram u F �w
CL .� y. O y a+ yU, fD y " G ZZ
ce `< n
.81
oo01!C c�c�Dw _ yp12;
� � �••: � � O
� �
A fD O a cD A rn
CD cD n
.�. ? ..� O Al y • rn �'. Q. �-r N W y
O ry ~ O • O :...
^�•.
CD
`'
= g cD
_ CD Q7 O `. y y
C ,� y � • O O rn Ll =�'
tn• Q' Q'• O „��
on Co. cD SQ
O
cp'
.<
N"
'C a Q "� 5"Lf fD a y t3
.x '� f► O C .O C ;
CD' cD n;7C" 's
rn rn C O O rn y ►. J••�°
n O' fD
a y a A�• Ir
N w. O,
p
cD O, a
O a c. 1Ny c cD m C
y' ID � 0 ;J C
f�/1 - `rT
Al
o Q, � y � ii1
'�.. , rQ""
A 23. ,O n < a O� m
ram.
�'
.» �
.`3
�' r'] � �
fD r .,<'
y'
�"� „y,.•
r � Q' F fD
a w
iD � y OHO..v
_� rn
fD cD cp CD H ,Mf
W A7 lD
rn 0' y '•' .x.. �_^t .•r cD `.
��fD ��oo�o"
0 W0-
�.
3oad�c n0.�"5'`53��
ifD�c..�
o�^�� ��a�m'+c�D=;a�oma��F
.-.�o..y °cMW@=* °"a0�C
o"'" off°
C
CS,: a ? ,H Q
cD Q VJ a y Vf a tr• Q1 y cD b A.
_ _.
fi rn LU O
_
O°crO
r`"'+, fU
O O L"
r.
CD
PC
R
A
NEWS CLIPPING
II Source: SUu_h ialtl Ti JWrIl i I Date: 0 /;-_3 %q& II
SPIN Standing Committee
Representatives To Be Selected
Residents of SPINS (Southlake
the Adams Addition, and others.
Program for the Involvement of
(Please see map.)
Neighborhoods) 10 and 14 are en-
SPIN 14 is located within the
couraged to attend a meeting to
area roughly bounded by 1709 to
select their respective Standing
the north, White's Chapel to the
Committee representatives. The
east, the city limits to the south, and.
meeting will be held Tuesday, Au- ; �
tracts of property on the west side
gust 27 at 7pm at the Community
of South Peytonville. It includes
Center at Bicentennial Park.
the subdivision of Lake Crest,
SPIN 10 is located within the
Timberlakes, Princeton Park,
area roughly bounded by Highland:
Monticello Estates, the Hills',o1
to the north, Carroll to the east, and 1
Monticello, Southlake Bills, 6=-
tracts located just west of White'sY ,
ney Hill, Air Park Estates, Coun-
'Chapel. It includes the subdivi- '
try Valk, Continental Park Estates,
sions of. Summerplace Addition,
etc.
Chapel Downs, Oak Hill Estates,
For more information contact
Mission Hill Estates, Lake Wood
Shana Yelverton at 481-5581, ext.
Acres, Southview, Diamond Circle
705.
Estates, White's Chapel Addition,
14
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: 6 u 4-n I0"t % JQu r/ Lu
Date: �'-j
Sister Cities Offers "Point
and Shoot" Challenge
Southlake Sister Cities has an-
stores). The entrant's name, age
nounced that they will be holding
category, address, and phone pum-
a photo contest in conjunction with
ber must be affixed to the back of
the upcoming fifth anniversary of
the photo. Deadline for entries is -
the Sister city relationship between
Tuesday, September 10, 5pm. Pho-
Southlake and Toyoma, Japan. The
tos may be dropped off at the
goal of the contest, entitles
Southlake Chamber of Commerce
"Southlake-- Our Home Town" is
office at 1725 E. Southlake Blvd.
to depict the character of Southlake
(inside the city administrative
through a diversity of photos rang-
building),..or arrangemgnts; can
ing from Southlake . residents to
' made by contacting Betty Spring
local activities, the terrain;`
at48i`-7082.'-Pleasenote.'anyques-
homelife, events of all kinds, still-
[ions regarding the contest should
life, and anything else that is rep-
be directed to Betty Springer,
resentative of Southlake. All
. Southlake Sister Cities Represen-
photos must have been taken
tative.
within the Southlake city or Carroll
The photos will be taken to
ISD boundaries.
Toyoma where they will be dis-
Prizes will be awarded in each
played in the local town hall, li-
of two categories: 16 and Under,
brary, and schools in celebration of
and 17 and Over, by a panel of
the five years of friendship between
All photos must be color, 8x10,
' the two communities. They will,
and mounted on white mat bold
be returned to Southlake later in
(found at craft or camera supply
. the fall and displayed locally.
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: 50 +h tOL Let J O U Y-n d 1
Date:
City To Swap Land With
�r Crossroads Square Developer
ll by Terry Fox portion and ektends north approxi-
'_' The City of Southlake and de- mately 98 feet into Bicentennial
veloper David McMahan have en- Park. It encompasses about 51,000
tered into an agreement that will sq.ft. The tract owned by
' allow for the expansion of the va- McMahan, located on thewest side`
cant Food Lion store in Crossroads of the center, a4jaacent to Bicenten=
Square shopping center and 'the "vial Pari'land, is approxumatejy
subsequent leasing of the store to 69,000 sq:ft.
Tom Thumb. The agreement McMahan reports that Tom
roughly defines two tracts of land Thumb has leased the Food Lion
adjacent to the center that will be portion and construction on 'the
swapped, facilitating the expansion expansion, which will increase the
of the Food Lion portion of the cen- store's size from 37,500 sq.ft to
ter. The tract of land owned by the 59,500 sq.ft., could possibly begin
city is located behind the Food Lion within the year.
9-3
NEWS CLIPPING
II Source: So i,4T I 1 16UC e Jo u r rw I Date: R %;3�q %k 11
Get Set For Fall With...
Southlake Parks Programs
Dance & Pom Class - Do you like
to dance? Then this dance program
is a perfect opportunity for you. In
this program you will learn dance
and porn routines to be performed
at shows and recitals. You will also
be invited to compete in pageants
and march in parades. Classes are
$4.50 per week with a $2 registra-
tion fee to be paid on the first day
of class. Class is for ages 4 and up
and the first class will begin on
Tuesday, September 3 from 6-7pm.
All classes will be held in the
Carroll Middle School new gym
located at 1101 E. Dove. For more
information call Dance America at
329-5626.
1996 Fall Basketball League -
This recreational basketball league
is open to players 16 and up, and
will be played Wednesday nights
at Carroll Middle School Gym.
Register now through September 4
for the September 9 thorough De-
cember2 season. The cost is $235
per team.
1996 Fall Men's Over 35 Softball
League - Teams may have 4 mem-
bens between 30 and 34. All game
will be played at Bicentennial Park,; .
Field #2. Register through August
23 for the 10 game season, to be.
played Thursday nights August 29'
through November 7. - Entry fee is
$250 per team.
1996 Fall Coed Softball League -
This recreational coed league is
open to players 16 and up. All
games will be played at Bicenten-
nial Park, Field #2. Register now
through August 23 for the 10 game
season, to be played Friday nights."
from August 30 through Novem
ber 8. The entry fee is $250 per,
team.
City Council Action - August 20
y
The city council, in regular session Tuesday, August 20, took the
following action:
n
- Authorized the Mayor to execute a contract with North Central Coun-
cil of Governments for a Solid Waste Grant.
'U
- Approved a commercial developer agreement for Rockenbaugh El-
ementary School.
Z
- Authorized the Mayor to accept the contract for services and fee sched-
0
ule with Trinity River Authority (TRA) for Central Regional Wastewa-
ter System for fiscal year 1997.
- Approved the 2nd Reading of a Rezoning Request for 2.819 acres lo-
cated on the south side of Highland just west of Kimball Ave. Current
zoning is AG Agricultural with a requested zoning of SF-lA Single
Family Residential District. Owners and applicants are Eric and Mary
Huning.
- Approved the 2nd Reading of a Rezoning Request for 2.875 acres lo-
cated on the east side of Randol Mill just south of Dove. Current zoning
is AG Agricultural with a requested zoning of SF -IA Single Family
Residential District. Owners and applicants are Theodore Dias and Glen
Barnett.
- Approved the 2nd Reading of a Rezoning Request for 2.18 acres lo-
cated at the southwest corner of Florence and Randol Mill Ave.. Cur-
to
0
rent zoning is AG Agricultural with a requested zoning of SF-30 Single
Family Residential District. Owners and applicants are Brian and Monica
Boutte.
- Approved the Site Plan for Rockenbaugh Elementary School, approx.
15 acres located south of 1709 on the proposed Byron Nelson Pkwy
ID(approx.
1075' south of 1709 at Diamond Blvd.) Current Zoning is
PUD Planned Unit Development. Owned by CISD and applied for by
Cheatham & Associates.
- Approved a Concept Plan, Site Plan, and Preliminary Plat foi
r--
Georgetown Park, 5.435 acres located on the south side of 1709-approx.
700' east of the intersection of Kimball and 1709. Current zoning is C-
r'r'
2 Local Retail Commercial District. Owned by R.G. Lyford and applied
for by Richard Myers, Realty Capital Corp.
C_
- Approved the Site Plan for Holt Dental Care,1.003 acres located approx.
325' west of the intersection of 1709 and Diamond Blvd. current zon-
ing is C-2 Local Retail Commercial District. Owner and applicant is
James Holt, D.D.S. .. , ,
- Approved the 1st Reading of a Rezoning and Concept Plan (6-1, Muller
against) and Plat Revision, for 1.822 acres located the southwest corner
of 1709 and Davis Blvd. Current zoning is C-2 Local Retrial Commer-
cial District and C-3 General Commercial District with a requested zon-
tv
ing of the former (C-2). Owners are DKV Partners I and Southlake
a,
Joint Venture and applicant is John R. Drews.
- Approved 5-2 (Evans and Harris against) the 2nd Reading amending
the Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods.
- Approved 6-1 (Moffat against) the 1 st Reading of the Fiscal Year 1996-
97 Operating Budget.
- Approved 6-1 (Moffat against) the 1st Reading of the Tax Levy Ordi-
nance.
�1
- Approved the 1 st Reading of a Rezoning Request for 1.51 acres located
at 585 N. Peytonville. Current zoning is AG Agricultural District with
a requested zoning of SF-lA Single Family Residential District. Own-
.�
ers and applicants are Mark and Karen Goodwin.
- Approved the Plat Showing of 2.39 acres located south of the intersec-
tion of Ten Bar Trail and N. Peytonville on N. Peytonville. Current
zoning is AG Agricultural and SF-30 Single Family Residential Dis-
trict. Owners are Mark Goodwin and Jode Wilson and applicant is Mark
Goodwin.
- Denied the 1 st Reading of a Rezoning Request and Site Plan for Raceuac
Petroleum located approx. 500'. west .of Hwy 1IA and 1709 C d
zoning is AG Agricultural District-withaxequested''zonit'!�' of C l
Retail Commercial district. Owner and applicant it'Southern Comer,,,
stone, Inc. ` L
X
0
NEWS CLIPPING
II Source: m, Sun [ Date: Q a ),/ C%
Southlake denies
Race Trac request
By Deborah Kendall
Staff Writer
Southlake. — The City
Council denied a proposed site
plan Tuesday night for a Race
Trac Petroleum station at the
intersection of East Southlake
Boulevard (FM 1709) and
Texas 114.
After Planning and Zoning
members unanimously denied
the request, a super -majority
vote (six of seven) of the coun-
cil members would have been
needed to approve the action.
Attorney William Dahlstrom
of the applicant, Southern Cor-
nerstone, Inc., said that the
retail use building would not
have a significant impact to
the traffic on FM 1709.
Dahlstrom predicted an in-
crease in existing traffic of
only 3 percent.
Customers ofthe service sta-
tion would "pass by and use,"
he said, therefore not causing
a significant traffic problem
on that corner.
Eleven notices were sent out
regarding the proposed proj-
ect, and six written responses
were received, both within
and outside of the 200-foot .
notification area.
City officials said that only
one of the six responses was
in favor of the project. The
others, officials said, opposed
the project due to potential
traffic hazards and the desire,
to hold out for quality devel4
opments such as a professional;;
office building or an up -scale
retail center.
Despite Race Trac Petro-
leum's willingness to meet the
city's articulation require-
ments, Mayor Rick Stacy said
that a more suitable location
in Southlake is necessary.
"We. will find a home for
you in Southlake," said Mayor
Stacy. "We just need to find a
better location."
Since this ordinance was
denied on the first reading,
the requested action will not
come back for a second read-
ing, according to City Man-
ager Curtis Hawk.
o"00ep$as. IV, o��= nio4�
.^. o
fif
of m 0V •C H � re � p. .. �•
D ON o s7 m 5O A cY A m4gp� m CO3.0O pr p. ;z1
tn� A ° a `^of9 .o, $
Frg
A
m m G A 0, co egg d no f a x ^
p eS O
a D m Cto 0 G. m A 00 A< ^' .Cy. O rr
g< p y p 0 A� CL A w
b^
m o`
p
CD
'^V
V
r-
�1
M
=
N
t�7
�y ••� m 3 .-o �S N� n
N ' tD � eD � ; j • � n, � C � x'
rD '^ v � a. w A `c - ram+ � h �' •• E =
�„ m ODm 7• m m n'm o
m E Jy m UQ < m fD
fi E. N< C O m �• -•
O
»,n.•CDnAA 3
cs.
A
n.� +'a
x c _°o_n a2 E' wS oa00.
v
+PNmm �� �n 7 y
�A'?c a c=►3 0
cCDos� �B c o -°'yam o < c ti
m m 'g �. -. � °t c O
Ac 3 0 ��.8 m'DD=
a= 3 as ° m ►-° o
e'. � � cD tD ? m• A �P � m m D
�'m •*m m dCS.�O m e� m �'pOp
cD= GC7K c� G.Cy Cn G apr
� n
• �m A 10 3
" � m co �. m o
°'-rA0-0 ti
°e��:511g90y1.o �t
G "°ems-• — 8 m=°
cn
fD CCDCL.A
=' Cn emi i� t"7 S
tT x cD cC771 , �' yi A �. c4 ► O
er m
ya' tt0 `a N'1 Dip tD W
° tom 5"�A Ww- a N
va 8 M� �� fD A•�m py
ry m n �• f�D f1 O' fD ^ ^V
03 �c�m am �,03.m a c9
G y5 ie eDdt'+C�'o� � •
cD.°,, 0.w�ma�vm aw e
�o<m•m CIO oocs,-
acID
m
r R.. ]vac $ w G �D
C
ro
Oc c c°po m a m CDCL
R" m
Carrotd,
From/1 A
r' ands at district build-out,'.o
'� vials project the
t
roughly 13,000
t:.• `The city (of
us were are
f �..
Maid." ZSrustee Doug
With the addition of about 600
�... students annually, a low com-
mercial development coupled F
with an increase ini,thetico)api
strustees say they havel"n hchoioe
Q
1C
F
New trash
rules cause
confusion
Flower Mound starts
garbage transition
BY ANDREW BACKOVER
Star -Telegram Staff Wnter
FLOWER'NFOUND — Resi-
dents in Flower Mound are con-
cerned about their trash.
Town officials are learning this in
the wake of a transition this month
from Texas Waste Management to
B'towning-Ferris Inc. The Town
Council approved the five-year
contract with Browning -Ferris, or
BFI, on Aug. 5.
Residents are confused about the
new toles regarding pickup times,
landfill fees and recycling bins, of-
ficials say.
"They don't like the fact that
we're going from two times a week
pickup to one time a week," Mayor
Garry Lipscomb said of some of
Flower Mound's residents. "They
don't like the fact that they have to
pay to go to the landfill. They don't
like the fact that it costs more."
-' Rachel Tafel, Flower Mound's
community information coordina-
toi, said she has fielded nearly 50
phone queries from residents want-
ing to know how the new service
will work.
!Phil Bray, the town's director of
administrative services, said his
customer -service representatives
received about 30 similar calls this
wdek.
Some of the upcoming changes
include:
WThrough Sept. 30, Texas
ate will continue to provide
.eu' bside trash disposal and recy-
cling twice a week. When BFI
.takes over Oct. 1, the service will
drop to once a week.
i Beginning next month, BFI
will allow residents free use of its
landfill at 801 E. College St. in
Lewisville, on the first Saturday of
each month. BFI landfill rates for
other days will be $4.90 per cubic
vard. Until residents receive their
first utility bill with BFI charges.
they can use their driver's licenses
to, gain entrance to the company's
landfill, officials said.
I Today. BFI will install tem-
porary recycling dumpsters be-
hind the municipal complex to re-
place Texas Waste's bins that
have been removed. Newspapers,
cans and bottles will be accepted.
'.■ During the next several
weeks, residents will receive their
ov,�.rqp
O
C
A
d
,•t-
J
Trash
From Page 113,
choice of a 95- or 68-gallon
Wheeled trash cart, which is'lid-
led to keep out water and anl-
als. The larger cart can hold
bout six garbage bags, said
Randi Smith, BFI's municipal
marketing manager.
Additional carts will cost t3.36
�er month, and residents will re-
�eive 18-gallon recycling bins at
10 extra cost, she said.
j "They currently have recycling
every other week," Smith said of
flower Mound residents. "We
will be providing recycling every
week on the same day as garbage
day."
For residents concerned about
the cost of the new service, BFI's.
base monthly rate of $8.77 in-
cIuding franchise and 1 illing fees
�—" is 24 cents higher than Texas
Vaste Management's, town of-
ficials said. Senior citizens will be,
charged about $1 less per month.
Town Manager Ron Ragland
said that BFI's state-of-the-art au-
tomated trucks are better,
equipped to handle Flower
Mound's expected growth in trash
even as the number of _pickup
days are cut by half. `
BFI's trucks, which are mount-
ed with three video cameras and
monitors, . require only one am
ployee — the driver — who uses a
joy stick to operate . a mechanical
arm that lifts .the curbside bins
and dumps ,them into the trick
As the',town s `trash Ioa , i
creases, .BFI's'.lower libor .t$sift
will help keep rates down,
Ragland said.
"My staff and team did a lot of
research, did reference checks on.
the performance of both compa-
nies," Ragland said. "BFI was the
preferred vendor when it came`to
quality service, whenetcame to
dealing with custoYner com.
plaints." , . ..
PC
PI
IC
�7
�' ,.• �' y rn co C � �
.�• p p y O "0'o cm � m�
IT,
a %- Q. O C .� •t I m
,�
=r C; � X O vwi 0 w
_ rn
CD
y .•.' 69
A v C gin' C a C CD O
CD CD
wooCD r-
�o�o w 0 c"wU
CnO Cam_ < a
. E.� � C a
a0 coo O
ao coaoc�oy��g��
O �ry:�•yo=naQ0°"°oa
_
r. cow C w w v' EAU �
'.• Vj
y "�..
O CQ➢3 r �'
O� w to co y
co
►� rT (D ae w _ /�
y N
cn'acn-vN'OcnmAmpm
N fR d�
dl
NJ
m
S. S,
00
O H O -s
—
0 0 -A CORjh ��
O.. CD O•
y � y' y G O
fa V
Ng vw C;
<D = y !O
c�
-. OS- =r
W.
3�
w
3 0 ,.
.Na SNO�f
a y o o
=per < 3
O
9
O
—
O
=
o 2 N C 7
O Q y
n
O =
c% c=u Ln
a 3z0
m
co
=
cc oni cn
vy3go, m
_
a 9 3
3
s
3
m
m
cn _� a
n m S w
D
m
cn
mwe0,0cc
" A Vl 41 N
3 3
c 3 W
c
3 y
m m
a
ym Q m
°
_
0 CD
0m�m
m
��°
o
—
m
3y N —I CD
m
a
d
W
r
b
z
7_,
W:%
cc
y
ull
w
F
O
9
A
A
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: �Ci1 �Q5 �DYYllrlq U,�GVI�S I Date:
ANSWER LINE
Q: How does Southlake balance residential
and business development with the need for'
more parkland and open space?
A: For every 50 residential lots or residential
units built within a development, the city
requires the developer to set aside one acre
for parkland or dedicated open space. Com-
nWcial or industrial developers are expected
to designate one acre of lancj for, park use or
,*en space for every, 50._:*ep ofx < , 4
rybnt or a portion of Ii devek:prr>e�t�.-.
SOURCE: „Cky of South(dkeYs
poit, summer 1996
A
NEWS CLIPPING
II Source: 0U }hIaM Ktwb * Tt mreS I Date: II
Youths can help city's parks board
News and Times make recommendations to the Applications are available at '
The city of Southlak; Js cur- Parks and Recreation Board. 1 the Parks and Recreation Office
rently seeking applications for ap- To apply for the board, youth at Bicentennial Park, located at
pointments,:to `-the Soutbiake must be residents of Southlake 400 N. White Chapel.
Youth Parks and Recreation and enrolled in school in seventh For more information, call Coy
Board. The Youth Board, will through 12th grade. Gray at 481-5581, Ext. 806,
A
NEWS CLIPPING
I� Source: �Q(*- j ia`C.tL 14if,Ws 4 TI1'Y1�t , I Date:
New club will be the toast of the town
News and Times
The city of Southlake and the
Southlake Chamber of Com-
merce are co -sponsoring a local
branch of the Toastmasters Club,
a worldwide organization dedi-
cated to teaching and improving
communication and leadership
skills.
The club is open to city and
school employees, local busi-
nesses and all residents of South -
lake and the surrounding commu-
nities. The first meeting will be
held on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at 7
a.m. in the White's Chapel Room
of the Southlake Community
Center at Bicentennial Park.
Toastmasters provides a forum
for developing and improving
speaking skills, presentation tech-
niques, managerial qualities, fun-
damentals of planning and lead-
ership, and team building. Group
members learn a variety of valu-
able skills applicable to business
and social situations, such as how
to speak effectively, how to con-.
duct a meeting, how to manage a
department or business, and how
to lead, delegate and motivate.
The club meets on a regular
basis for approximately one hour.
A typical meeting includes a brief
club business discussion; table
topics, which are impromptu talks
lasting from one to two minutes;
and prepared speeches ranging
from five to seven minutes, but
with specific communication ob-
jectives.
Each prepared speech receives
a constructive evaluation by a fel-
low club members. Program as-
signments are rotated among the
members so that each person is
given the opportunity to speak,
listen and evaluate.
The club is self -funded by
membership dues: a $16 one-time
fee, $18 international dues every
six months and local dues, which
are set by each club. Local dues
are paid every six months. Dues
are used for renting meeting
space (if needed), refreshments/
meals, "guest speakers and other
functions.
Established in 1924, Toastmas=
ters has 170,000 members in
more than 8,000 clubs in 52 coun-
tries. The mission of a Toastmas-
ters club is to provide a mutually,
supportive and positive learning
environment in which every
member has the opportunity to
develop communication and
leadership skills, which in turn
foster self-confidence and per-
sonal growth.
For more information, contact
Tracy Southers, public informa-
tion officer for the city of South -
lake, at 481-5581, Ext. 819.
A
A
NEWS CLIPPING
A
A
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: So LA -M LcWt J cv Y rick ( Date: 3 ��
City Offers Free CPR Class
The Southlake Department, ,
of Public Safety - Fire Services
Division will be hosting a
Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscita=
tion (CPR) course on Saturday,
September 14. The class will.
cover Adult, Child and Pediat-
ric CPR. The course will be
held in the Southlake city hall
council chambers from 8 a.m.
to noon. There is no charge for
this course and it is open to all
citizens or people who work in
the City of Southlake. For more
information or to reserve a place
in the course, contact481-5581
ext. 737.
NEWS CLIPPING
II Source: soul-hak'G oourna i iDate:
Open Garage Doors Can
Lead To Stolen Golf Clubs
Southlake hit by rash of thefts
by Terry Fox
Police are encouraging resi-
dents to keep their garage doors
closed after a series of golf club
thefts were reported in several
Southlake neighborhoods. Nearly
10 cases were reported at the time
of this article, all of which occurred
at homes where the garage was
open and the golf clubs stored
within, officials reported. In some
cases, the residents were at home.
The average cost of the stolen golf
sets was $1,500.
"It's probably the same indi-
vidual [committing the thefts],"
said Carrie Sullinton, Community
Services Officer. And because
there are no serial numbers on golf
clubs or equipment, police predict
the clubs will be easy to pawn.
They do not rule out the possibil-
ity that the thief is himself a golfer.
Don Allen, a resident of Chapel
Downs subdivision, reported his
clubs stolen after he or his wife
failed to put the garage door down
when they left for work. "I hadn't
even unpacked them yet," Allen
said, explaining that he and his
family had just returned from a trip
and had propped his and his 8 year
old son's custom golf sets against
an armoire in the garage. The sets
had been carefully selected and
customized over several years,'he
reported, until he felt.he had.the
sets he wanted. "They're nearly
impossible to replace."
Police have contacted SPIN rep-
resentatives for each neighborhood,
as well as other city leaders, and at
the time of this article were plan-
ning on placing an announcement
on the city's public access cable
channel 25.
Police warn that it is easy for
residents of a community like:
Southlake to feel a false sense of
security, as this is the first such se-
ries of thefts, but the solution, they,
say, is easy. "Close your garage
doors."
NEWS CLIPPING
Source: 'o-vu + l LQ tet J o(A Y na I 6
P5�o9mething For Every Woman
by Christy Hutson, lunch and shopping , sight-seeing and children in Northeast Tarrant
Southlake Newcomers Club excursions to such places as the County. A Second Glance donated
Southlake Newcomer's Club rodeo, area museums, cultural over $90,000 from its first year.
offers something for every woman. events, dinner theaters, and tours Additionally, the Southlake New -
Established in 1993, the non-profit take members all over the comers Club provides a wide range
organization encourages women to Metroplex in the Gadabouts group. of support tot he community
make new friends while providing Gadabouts helps to acquaint you through our major fund-raising
service to the community. Mem- with the area, but more assistance project, the Holiday Home Tour
bership is open to new and long- is available through our Reloca- and smaller efforts like a silent and
time residents from Southlake and tion Group. Members enjoy par- live auction. These projects have
neighboring communities for the ticipating in other day and evening, enabled us to contribute to endeav-
fee of $20 per year. Monthly meet- social activities, like: Antiques and ors like Adventure Alley, Project
ings are held the second Monday Oldies, arts and Crafts, Book Dis- Graduation for Carroll High
of each month beginning Septem- cussion, Bowling, Bridge, Bunco, School, scholarships for Carroll
ber 9, from 9:30 until 11:30am, at Canasta, ENCORE (empty nester High School recognition commit:-_
the Carroll Baptist Church, 1280 considering option really exciting), tee, Keep Southlake Beautiful -I
East Highland Street. After busi- Gals Night Out, Guinea Pig Lunch; Open Arms, ?Child Advocates of
ness is discussed at Die meetings, International Group, Mah Jongr `Tarrantnst Hare . _
lecturers teach us everything from MASK (moms and small kids), Children, and the teddy bear pro-
creating a showplace in our home Relo Alumni, Secret Pal, Sit `n gram through the Southlake Police
and the simple art of floral arrang- Stitch `Itch, and Starving Writers. Department.
ing from local designers, to chemi- Couples social activities include If you are a new resident who
cal dependency awareness, monthly bridge, quarterly socials needs help adapting to this area,
solutions for the hormonal roller and evening outings. or a longtime resident who wants
coaster and new laser techniques Or maybe involvement with a to meet new ladies, join us at the
in plastic surgery from area special- charity is your interest. The Southlake Newcomers Club meet-
ists. Other speakers from the Southlake Newcomers Club runs ing on September 9, at 9:30am,
Carroll ISD, the City of Southlake the only all volunteer resale how 1280 E. Highland Street at the
City Manager's office, and business in the Metroplex, A second Glance Carroll Baptist Church. For addi-
leaders keep us informed on our Resale shop, located in Grapevine. tional information, please call
ever changing community. Since it is an all volunteer shop, it Linda McNeely, President 421-
Are you interested in socializ- allows more proceeds to go directly 6156, or Barbie Derby, Member- i
ing? Southlake Newcomers Club to the Open Arms Home, a non- ship481-8744. "Wherever you are,
has more than twenty special in- profit organization that provides it is your friends who make your
terest groups. Monthly outings for continuous care for abused wom6 world."
0
Police Report
Compiled from Southlake DPS Police Reports
8/8 DWI; 500 blk of W. Hwy 114.
8/8 Harassment; 3000 blk of W. 1709.
8/8 Failure to Report an Accident; 1400 blk of S. White's Chapel,
dam. 1988 BMW, $500.
8/9 Harassment; 1 E. Kirkwood.
8/9 Burglary of Vehicle; 300 blk of Dove Cr. Tr, stolen Ritalin
tablets, P.O. box key, $2 in change, dam. cup holder, $144.
8/9 Burglary of Vehicle; 800 blk of Dove Cr. Tr, stolen speakers,
cd's, radar detector, $2 in change, credit cards, wallet.
8/9 Theft; 700 blk of Longford Cir, stolen hand saw, tools, etc.,
$366.
8/9 Burglary; 1600 blk of Mockingbird Ln, stolen saws, drills, $289.
8/9 Burglary; 1200 blk of Whispering Ln, stolen boy's bike, $250.
8/9 Theft; 1100 blk of Wyndsor Ct, stolen cash, $3,500.
8/10 PI; 2500 N. Carroll.
8/10 Barglary-100 blk of Parkcrest Dc; stolen mierowave,s�ove,
dam garbage mind inten'tirri Sys. $63U.7T '7Z7— K .
8/10 DWI; 2200 W. 1709.
8/11 Possession of Marijuana; 1100 blk of S. Kimball.
8/11 Theft; 2200 blk of W. 1709, recovered cosmetics, $50.
8/12 Bigamy; 600 blk of N. Carroll.
8/13 CM; 1700 blk of Shady Oaks, dam. windows, $400.
8/13 Burglary of Vehicle; 300 blk of Dove Cr. Tr, stolen radar det.,
$200.
8/13 Poss. CS; 2200 blk of 1709, 4.4g cocaine, paraphernalia.
8/14 Theft, 1100 Wyndsor Ck, stolen cash $3,500.
8/14 Abandoned Vehicle;1600 Randol Mill Ave.,1984 Olds Delta.
821 Theft; Albertson's at 2201 W. 1709, stolen nuts, $3.69.
8/15 Theft; Chevron at 2315 E. 114, stolen gas, $18.33.
8/16 CM; 500 blk of Fox Glen, dam. trees, $1,500.
8/16 Theft; 1200 blk of Cross Timbers, stolen jewelry, $1600.
8/16 Assault; 900 blk of Parkview.
8/16 DWI; 100 W. 114.
8/16 PI; 100 W. 114.
8/17 Unauth. Use Veh; 1000 blk of W. Dove, stolen red GMC p/u
truck, $7,000.
8/17 Display of Fictitious License Plates; 1000 blk of W. Dove,
recovered inspection/registration stickers.
8/17 Theft; 2100 blk of E. NW Pkwy, recovered boxes of new cloth-
ing, $5,400.
8/20 Burglary; 600 blk of Park Place Ct, stolen marble bath tub,
dam. interior, $2,200.
8/20 Theft; 1300 blk of Woodbrook, stolen wheelbarrow, $40.00.
8/21 Theft; Albertson's at 2201 W. 1709, stolen nuts.
8/22 Assault w/threat Bodily Injury; 600 blk of Overland Tr.
8/22 Theft; Circle E at 401 N. Kimball, stolen gas, $4.00
8/22 Failure Give Notice/Striking Unatt. Veh.; 600 blk of N.
Kimball.
8R2 Recovered/Found Prop.; DL, ID, wallet, photos, earrings.
8/23 Burglary; 200 blk of E. Chapel Downs, stolen golf clubs,
$2,280.
8/23 Forgery; Texas National Bank at 3205 E. 114, $400.
8/24 Runaway/Missing Person; 1300 blk of Bent Creek Tr.
8/24 Burglary;1400 blk of Wedgewood Ct, stolen golf clubs, $1,598.
8/24 Burglary; Mr. Jim's Pizza at 2366 E. 114, stolen cash, $2,510.
8/24 Assault/Threat; 1900 blk of E. Dove
0
Source:
L A
NEWS CLIPPING
N
Learning
to lead —
here's how
TIMES
News and Times
Leadership Southlake, spon__-
cored by the city of Southlake and
the Southlake Chamber of Com-
merce, is a great new way to get
involved in the community.
It is designed for individuals
who are interested in serving in
various top leadership roles such
as public office or key volunteer
roles. Leadership Southlake is
designed to develop active com-
munity leaders through participa-
tion in a variety of team- and lead-
ership -building exercises.
Leadership Southlake has been
responsible for the development
of, through the advocacy project)
presentations, such endeavors as
the Southlake Playground Initia-
tive (Adventure Alley), the South-,;
lake Association of Volunteers,
Friends of the Southlake Library,
Southlake Living Science Center,
Southlake Care Corps and many
others.
Residents' input into the com-
(see "Chamber, "page 3)
.0-W
Date: 8 13o19b
Chamber
from page 1
muriity is necessary to increase the
quality of life enjoyed in South -
lake —get involved today!
For more information or an ap-
plication, contact the Chamber at
481-9200.
� W Z y O
°• w °
ySr�
c
f0 0 w :.,may
fD 00
O C. �. 0 �i, N X
.
ppp
G. O G
O o b
._
p
Ode
Er
�
O
;r w =
w
oo r
"1
(—:
CoCo
CD =
:r
ray CA
ITI
Tw
'� r•4 H
CA N
~
r"r•
O
n�o
O
CDD� y
O" V O✓ N
CO)w d 0 ,
p
00
p-O.
�
CD w.�
y B.CD
xn
CD
E D
�,°'�
°, Q �`. � 0
y C
�-+
�
.:n
r:
G x O y N co
M CD
fD O�a-" w w COD ACQ 0
t
a W w
x '" = c�D sf� Co- I.- y
w CD N _
Os O "'O On cr ZZO �' �- `OQ�
�
o'ac aOp 0 O O(D O CD
p- 2.c � .b y
a =QQ CD
�.O w
p G x b x Z C^D C C a
7' v CA
aSR C O p ,`d-to
w
° O o o
,n„ y
Q:
O' ^
p
A .1
y
c �' N
G
bq
w
CID
CA
w
a
O
m
p
CD ^ O
ay ° G
H o
w ^~' O O wN
?» w
(n
CD co w
oY w
o CD
CDy�w��
A
O =
rA 0UQ
.,
z
CD C�0 p; N C �""'f 7 w � 0 i
c`D o "d
a O k< o
CD
.d C
a cD -,
CD CNl1 `Cy ^ r O ^ r
p n O M Cs ,.
y H ai H CDCD CAD CD
CCD Q H "p
O _a ,r O°
CD
w
"1
co O SO 'O•.bp•N IM
Ov w wCD
CL D
tsi w a �_' rA
cD y
Pt ~ .ny " O O C Aat C
a� o w
^ a A (D O
p twn on
w
OHCD w A O Q
° °' a° tro
0
3 Ewa°'
C Q: G. � .O•. a.00q
W 'q 10 00 �+ r..] '•.
00� CD N -= M= ". 1
n• n w -1 `^ CD CC
� .O•.CD
CD
.p n CD
o �••t w
EA'y �. O O I
00 Q; p —0 0.0
�
0 �• w >.O, G
^ . n CD p -1O+ 0 ++ p
00
n d O
o� C m°-
c0°-;� �
0 o w c�0CD
0CD
CD
CJ� 'rn0 CD M <
'v ID
At CCD CAD .n-r w to
ooVo�oy�aa:
city manager's report
august 30, 1996
Mark your
Calendar
For Southlake's
Special Historical Events
4-40th Anniversary to Begin
with a Birthday Party!
The 40th Year Anniversary
Committee is planning a year long
celebration with (4) special events.
The "kick-off" event will be the
Birthday Party in the Park on
Sunday, September 29, from
1 p.m. to 5 p.m. There will be
balloons, cake, plus old fashioned
events such as croquet and
orseshoes. Mark you calendar
*ftfor a day of community celebration
and family fun.
,[Historical society Hosts
a special Meeting
When: September 16, 1996
Where: The Lodge - 7:00 p.m.
What: Dave Lieber's Look at
Southlake: Past, Present & Future
SPIN - Developer Meeting
September 11 - 7:00 p.m. (Lodge)
Meet with Aguirre Incorporated to
discuss the proposed development
for the N. E. corner of 1709 &
Peytonville Road. The proposed
I-velopment is a 60,000 sq.ft.
"Assisted Living Facility.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Z
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996
The following items will be addressed at the regular City Council meeting
scheduled for September 3, 1996
Consent Agenda:
1) Renewal agreement between the City and Tarrant County Public Health
Department for Food and Pool Inspection Services for FY 1996-97.
2) Vote on candidate for each place on the TML Risk Pool Board of Trustees.
3) Authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the cities of
Southlake, Colleyville, Grapevine, and Trophy Club, as well as GCISD and
CISD for Teen Court..
4) Authorization to advertise for FY 95-96 and FY 96-97 Seal Coat ( Micro
Surfacing) Annual Programs.
5) Authorizing the Mayor to execute Change Order #1, Pump Station #1.
Regular Agenda:
Second Readings and Public Hearings:
1) Ord. No. 665, FY 1996-97 Operating Budget.
2) Ord. No. 664 Tax Levy Ordinance.
3) Ord. No. 480-210, Rezoning and Concept Plan for a Retail Center at the
SW Comer of 1709 & Davis. (#15)
4) ZA 96-88, Site Plan for Wendy's at the S.side of 1709 & Davis Blvd (#15)
5) Ord. No. 480-209, Rezoning for the S. side of Ten Bar Trail & N.
Peytonville Ave. (#13)
6) ZA 96-103, Revised Site Plan for the Brazos Electric Power Cooperative
Substation on E. T. W. King, 1700' north of Kirkwood Drive. (#2)
7) ZA 96-107, Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network at the S. Side of
Ravenaux, 500' west of North White Chapel.(#11)
First Readings:
1) Ord. No. 480-208, (ZA 96-85) Rezoning and Concept Plan for Stone
Bridge Park located 600' NW of Randol Mill and 1709. (#16)
2) ZA 96-89, Preliminary Plat for the NE comer of Shady Oaks Drive and
1709. (#13)
3) Ord. No. 480-215, (ZA 96-104) Rezoning for 530' north of Bob Jones and
North White Chapel. (A)
4)Ord. No. 480-216, (ZA 96-105) Rezoning for 10.5 acres located at the NW
comer of Bob Jones and North White Chapel (#1)
5) ZA 96-106, Preliminary Plat for the NW comer of Bob Jones Road and
North White Chapel. (#1)
Resolutions:.
8) Res. No. 96-57, Amending the Fee Schedule.
9) Household Hazardous Waste Contract
Other Items for Consideration:
1) Authorizing the Mayor to accept the amendment to the agreement with
Sprint Spectrum L.P. for the Bicentennial Ground Tower Lease.
'Oevelopment c4etivity
z4pdAte
Planning and Zoning
Meetings
City Council, September 3. 1996 -
Regular Meetine
96-85 Zoning/Concept Plan„ Stone Bridge
Park. (416)
96-87 Zoning, A.A.Freeman No. 522
Addn, Lot 3. (#13)
96-91 Zoning/Concept Plan, Retail Center
Davis Blvd. & FM 1709. (#15)
96-88 Site Plan, Parkers Corner Add. -
Wendys (#15)
96-75 Zoning/Concept Plan, Southlake
Garden Offices. (#13)
96-89 Preliminary Plat, 1709 Southlake
Oaks Addition. (#13)
96-103 Site Plan, Primeco Commun.
Antenna. (#2)
96-104 Zoning, RD Price No. 992, Tr. 1 &
2, 1.57 acres. (#1)
96-105 Zoning, RD Price No. 992, Tr. 1 &
2, 10.5 acres. (#1)
96-106 Preliminary Plat, Tracts 1 & 2,
12.1 acres. (#1)
96-107 Site Plan, Christian Mens
Network, Ravenaux Village (#11)
96-86 Site Plan, Rockenbaugh
Elementary, Timarron. (#9)
P & Z Meetine, September 5, 1996 -
Reeular Meetine
96-81 Zoning/Concept Plan, Southlake
Woods.(#14-15)
96-80 Preliminary Plat, Southlake Woods.
(#14-15)
96-96 Zoning/SitePlan, Cimarron Acres,
(#16)
96-97 Zoning, Cimarron Acres,
(#16)
96-98 Plat Revision, Cimarron Acres,
(tabled to 10/3)
96-108 Specific Use Permit, Kroger (Beer
sales)
96-109 Zoning/Concept Plan, Mesco Add.
(#6)
96-110 Revised Concept Plan, Church of
Christ. (#16)
96-111 Final Plat, Timarron Addition. (#9)
96-112 Revised Concept Plan, 1 st
American Savings Bank. (#10)
96-113 Site Plan, 1 st American Savings
Bank. (#10)
96-114 Revised Preliminary Plat, 1st
American Savings Bank. (#10)
96-90 Rezoning/Concept Plan, Southlake
Prof. Plaza. (#14)
Ord. No. 480-W
Public Works Update on
Timarron Trial Grout
Injection Program
Weather permitting, next
Wednesday, September 4, the
contractor will begin the
excavation of Creekway Bend
Drive to determine the success
or failure of the slurry grout
injection program. The street
will be impassable while
excavation is being done, but
will be reopened each
evening. The work is
expected to take about three
days.
INTERNET PROJECT
TO BEGIN
As a result of increasing
resident interest in the
Internet, the City is in the
process of exploring this
option. Kevin Hugman has
formed an ad -hoc committee
of staff, several interested
citizens, and the City's
computer consultant to design
and implement this feature.
LEADERSHIP
SOUTHLAKE
This year's Leadership
Southlake class, co -sponsored
by the City and the Chamber
will begin on Tuesday,
September 10. The first
session on Local Government
will include an introduction by
Mayor Stacy, and a briefing
on the responsibilities of the
City Council by council
members Evans and Harris.
ale\wme Afew
#10 & #14
Congratulations to Mr. Al
Morin who was selected by
the interested residents of
SPIN #10, and to Mr. Doug --�
McKelvy who was selected by
residents in SPIN #14. The
election of Mr. Morin and
Mr. McKelvy is pending City
Council appointment. Thanks
to the residents of SPIN #10
and #14 who participated in
the selection process.
SPIN Neighborhoods 9,10,13
& 14 have set up their
Neighborhoods in a Council
format with liaisons for the
individual subdivisions. The
liaisons are helping to fulfill
the communication goals of
SPIN.
Thanks a Bunch o _,
to all those who
participate ini
SPIN! "'�
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Renewal Agreement Between the
City of Southlake and Tarrant County Public Health Department for
Food and Pool Inspection Services
Tarrant County has submitted a renewal agreement for services on food and pool inspections.
There is one revision in the agreement which is noted in paragraph seven. This revision provides
for an on going contract with a 90-day minimum cancellation notice. Hence, this indicates that
the City Council will not need to consider this item on an annual basis.
Currently, Tarrant County Public Health Department provides inspection service for food
establishments and public swimming pools for the City. The City does not pay a fee to Tarrant
County for these inspections, however, the County collects permit fees as stated on the attached
agreement.
This service has been adequate to meet our needs. Therefore, staffs recommendation is to place
authorizing the mayor to execute a renewal agreement between the City of Southlake and Tarrant
County Public Health Department for food and pool inspection services on the Regular City
Council Agenda for September 3, 1996, for City Council consideration.
BW/ls
Attachment: Agreement
Memorandum from the Building Official Paul Ward
C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\AGREEMEN.INTACOUNTY\H-DEPnSERVICES.MEM
5A-1
A
A'r.22P N.
" I.J 08 p
�v ffi
oQ�nn XAS �
August 8, 1996
Curtis E. Hawk
City Manager
City of Southlake
667 N. Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Mr. Hawk:
Fort Worth - Tarrant County
Public Health Departments
1800 University Drive. Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Thank you for allowing the Tarrant County Health Department to provide inspection
services to your city during FY 95/96. Enclosed are three copies of your Food and Pool
Inspection Service contract agreements for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996.
There � are no new fees or program changes for FY 97. Please note however, that
paragraph seven provides for an on going contract with a 90 day minimum cancellation
notice. In your previous food and pool service contracts, the contract period was for only
one year.
Please sign the three contract agreements where indicated and return all three contracts
with an original signature to our office no later than September 13, 1996. After approval
by Commissioners Court, we will send you a copy with the appropriate signatures.
Thank you for your contract renewals. If you have any questions, you may contact
Veronica Sutton or me at (817) 871-7510.
Sincerely,
Richard Shafer, D
Consumer Health Administrator
cc Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary
Terry Bale, CHS I
Enclosures: 3
5A-2
Administration 871.7237. Fax 871.7335. Animal Control 871•-290, Epidemiology dr Communicable Disease 871 7279.
Disease Control 871-7292. Consumer Health (Fort Worth) 871.7 256. Consumer Health and Environmental Quality (Tarrant Countv) 871-7510.
Public Health laboratories 871 7245. Personal Health Services 871•7 250. Public Health Promotion 971 7340.
Health Statistics do Information Services 871.7399. WIC Program (Fort Worth) 87I :219. (Tarrant County) 871 7571
A
• ♦ PmNO W IeCyebC P+O.r
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
WHEREAS the governing bodies of the parties herein finds the following agreement in the best interest
of the citizens they serve and
WHEREAS Article 3, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 791 of the Texas Government
Code authorize Counties and Cities in the State of Texas to contract with one, another for the performance of
various governmental functions and services including those in the areas of public health and welfare and
WHEREAS TARRANT COUNTY and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE pursuant to the Constitution and
the laws of the State of Texas desire to make and enter into a contract whereby Tarrant County will make available
to the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Food Establishment and Public Swimming Pool Inspection Program Services for
the public health protection of its residents,
NOW, THEREFORE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
TARRANT COUNTY, hereinafter called "County", acting herein by and through TOM
VANDERGRIF'F, duly authorized COUNTY JUDGE as directed by the Commissioners Court of Tarrant County,
and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called
"City', acting herein by and through RICK STACY, its duly authorized MAYOR, do hereby covenant and agree
as follows:
1.
The County hereby makes available to the City for the protection of its residents Food Establishment and Public
Swimming Pool Inspection Program Services through the Tarrant County Health Department.
2.
The Tarrant County Health Department will provide its services to all food establishments and public swimming
pools located within the corporate limits of said City during the term of this agreement. The Tarrant County
Health Department agrees to provide appropriate signs to be posted at public food establishments and public
swimming pools or spas that do not meet the standards of the Health Department as specified in the ordinances of
the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. Such signs shall state that the facility does not meet Health Department standards
and shall contain such other information as needed to inform the public that the facility has failed to meet health
standards. Tarrant County Health Department shall notify the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE about this action.
3.
The said services shall consist of a food establishment and public swimming pool inspection program, certification
of establishments .for issuance of health permits, collection of fees, notification to the City of violations of health
ordinances, documentation of program activities within the City in periodic reports, and where legally required by
ordinance, approval of food establishment manager training, food handler training and pool operator training and
certification.
4.
The City agrees to maintain during the period of this agreement ordinances which: adopt the current Texas Board
of Health "Rules on Food Service Sanitation" and "Rules on Retail Food Store Sanitation"; designate the Director
of the Tarrant County Health Department as Health Authority for the purposes of this agreement; require all food
establishments within corporate limits to maintain a valid health permit; adopt health permit fees of $150.00
annually for each food service and retail food establishment that engages in food preparation, $100.00 annually for
�ach retail food establishment that does not engage in food preparation, and $35.00 for each temporary food
:stablishrnent; assign to the Tarrant County Health Department the authority to collect health permit fees from
permit applicants; and require food establishments to have certified managers and food handlers when required by
law.
5 A-3
5.
The City agrees to maintain during the period of this agreement ordinances which: adopt the current Texas
"Minimum Standards of Sanitation and Health Protection Measures". Title 5, Chapter 341, Subchapter D. Section
341.064 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and "Design Standards for Public Swimming Pool Construction", 25
TAC, Chapter 337, Sections 337.71 through 337.96; designate the Director of the Tarrant County Health
Department as Health Authority for the purposes of this agreement: require all public swimming pools and spas
within the corporate limits to maintain a valid public swimming pool permit: adopt public swimming pool permit
fees of $100.00 annually for each public swimming pool and spa; assign to the Tarrant County Health Department
the authority to collect public swimming pool permit fees from permit applicants: and require facilities to have
certified pool operators when required by law.
6.
If during inspection of a food facility, pool or spa, Tarrant County notices a violation of the City's code, the
Tarrant County Health Department shall notify the appropriate City official. The City shall be responsible for
enforcement of the City's health ordinances. County employees whose testimony may be required for such
enforcement pursuant to the Agreement shall present themselves for testimony in any such enforcement action
taken by the City in accordance with the procedures established by SOUTHLAKE'S MUNICH'AL COURT for
the appearance of law enforcement officers.
7.
This agreement shall begin upon the approval of both the City Council and the Tarrant County Commissioners
Court and shall continue until canceled by a minimum of 90 days written notice from either party.
8.
The County is an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement and is not an officer, agent, servant, or
employee of the City. No employee of the County shall be an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City as a
result of this Agreement.
9.
No funds or money shall be due to Tarrant County from the City as a result of this Agreement. Tarrant County
hall receive its total payment for services provided from the collection of penrrit fees as stated within this
Agreement and as authorized by ordinance of the City. The City stall immediate) notify the County
change in foes as authorized.
Y ty of any
EXECUTED this day of
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
RICK STACY, MAYOR
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
City Attorney
Date. -
ATTEST:
City Manager
1996 in Tarrant County, Texas
COUNTY OF TARRANT
STATE OF TEXAS
By:
TOM VANDERGRIFF, COUNTY JUDGE
APPROVED AS TO FORM
5 A-4
County Legal Advisor
vfty v1 ovuananc, gcnaa
MEMORANDUM
August 27, 1996
TO: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
FROM: Paul Ward, Building Official
SUBJECT: 1997 Food and Pool Contract Agreement
I have reviewed the 1997 Food and Pool Inspection Service contract agreement with the Tarrant
County Health Department and find no program changes from the 1996 contract agreement.
The agreement will continue to provide services by the Tarrant County Health Department
regarding the food establishments and public swimming pool inspection program. A new
paragraph has been added to the agreement allowing the contract to continue until cancelled by
either party. (see paragraph 7)
Veronica Sutton of the Ft. Worth Tarrant County Health Department commented to me on
Monday, "that because the 1997 contract will become an on going contract, with a 90 day
cancellation notice, it will not be necessary for it to be renewed each year saving time and paper
work. "
I recommend the 1997 contract be scheduled for the September 3rd City Council meeting.
Please contact, me if you have any questions.
PW/jb
5A-5
OFFICIAL BALLOT
Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental
Board of Trustees Election
Ballots must reach the office of the Tony Korioth, Secretary of the Board of the Intergovernmental
Risk Pool no later than September 30, 1996. Ballots received after this date cannot be counted.
All ballots should be mailed to: Trustee Election, Tony Korioth, Secretary of the Board, P.O.
Box 26780, Austin, Texas 78755.
The names of the officials listed on this ballot have been nominated to serve a six -year term on
the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool (Workers' Compensation, Property and Liability) Board
of Trustees.
Each member of the Pool is entitled to vote for Board of Trustee members. Please record your
choices by placing an "V in the square beside the candidate's name. You should vote for one
candidate from each place.
❑ Robert T. Herrera, City Manager, City of La Porte (Region 14). Mr. Herrera
has served as City Manager since October 1986. Mr. Herrera has served on the
TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool Board since May 1993. Mr. Herrera was a
member of the TML Legislative Policy Committee on Personnel and the
Attorney General's Municipal Advisory Committee. Mr. Herrera has served on
the Board of Directors of we La Porte Chamber of Commerce. He recently
served on the Chancellor Search Committee to recruit a new Chancellor for the
San Jacinto College System and serves on the Southeast Economic Development
Board. Mr.Herrera has a Bachelor's Degree in Finance/Economics from Baylor.
WRITE IN CANDIDATE:
❑ Saul N. Ramirez, Jr., Mayor, City of Laredo (Region 7). Saul Ramirez was
elected to the City Council in 1982, in 1990 was elected Mayor and re-elected
in 1994. During his tenure, Mayor Ramirez has developed numerous projects
to aid the City's rapid growth. Mayor Ramirez serves on the United States
Conference of Mayors Advisory Board, TML Committee on Insurance Funds,
Chair of TML's Policy and Personnel Committee and co -Chair of the United
States Conference of Mayors Task Force on Immigration. Mayor Ramirez has
served on the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool Board of Trustees since 1989.
WRITE IN CANDIDATE:
David Prewitt, Mayor of Ralls (Region 3), having served in that position since
❑ 1988. Mr. Prewitt has served as President of the Ralls School Board for 11
years, Director of the Education Service Center, Region XVII, President of
TML Region 3, several co-op gin and church boards. Mr. Prewitt currently
serves on the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool Board of Trustees and as
liaison to the TML Group Benefits Risk Pool.
WRITE IN CANDIDATE:
❑ Donald B. Davis, City Manager, City of Stephenville, (Region 8) since 1989.
Mr. Davis has over 25 years of experience in municipal government, 17 as a city
manager. He has served as City Manager in Big Spring and Palestine, Assistant
City Manager of Hurst and Administrative Assistant to the City Manager in
Lubbock. He received a BA from Texas Tech in 1966 and was a recipient of the
Clarence E. Ridley Scholarship, offered by the Texas City Management
Association.
❑ Roger Eades, City Commissioner/Mayor Pro-Tem, City of Hereford (Region
2). Mr. Eades has been a City Commissioner for six years and Mayor Pro-Tem
for four years. He has been in the insurance business for 19 years, having
served as an underwriter with several large firms and for the last 13 years, as
an independent agent.
❑ Tom Ferguson, Director of Finance and City Secretary, City of Big Spring
(Region 4), where he has worked for the City for 21 years. Mr. Ferguson is a
member of Government Finance Officers Association of Texas (GFOAT) and
Government Treasurers of Texas (GTOT). Mr. Ferguson is Region 4 Director
of GFOAT and is active in GTOT and Texas Municipal Clerks Association and
is also Risk Manager for the City. Under Mr. Ferguson's guidance, the City has
received Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for
the last 8 years.
❑ Truitt Gilbreath, City Manager, City of Pflugerville (Region 10). A City
Manager in Texas for several years and the current manager of Pflugerville, a
high growth city north of Austin. Mr. Gilbreath has a graduate degree in
Business with masters level degree in Psychology from East Texas State
University. He is a veteran of the Vietnam era and is married with one daughter
attending college. Mr. Gilbreath has a strong interest in maintaining good
benefit programs for employees.
go]
PE
It
❑ Paul C. Isham, City Attorney, City of Grand Prairie (Region 13), where he has
served in that capacity since January 1993. Mr. Isham has more than 25 years
of municipal law experience. He has served as city attorney for the cities of
Austin, Fort Worth, Denton, Mansfield and Westlake. Mr. Isham has also
served as municipal judge for the cities of Denton, Edgecliff Village and River
Oaks. He is a former board member of TML and Texas City Attorneys
Association, and a member of the International Municipal Lawyers Association.
❑ Herbert L. Johnson is Mayor of the City of Hempstead (Region 14) since 1990,
an elected official since 1980 and a retired school administrator. Mr. Johnson
currently serves on the TML Legislative Policy Committee on Community and
Economic Development and is a representative to the General Assembly of the
Houston -Galveston Area Council. Mr. Johnson was appointed by the
Governor's office to serve on the Texas Review Board for the approval of Grants
to Regional Municipalities in the State of Texas and is also active in a variety of
other community and state organizations.
❑ Francis E. Parks, City Manager, City of Weimer (Region 14), where he has
worked for the City of Weimer since 1976. He is a member of the Board of
Directors of Texas Public Power Association having served as President, Vice -
President, and Secretary/Treasurer. Mr. Parks is a founding member and
Director of CEN-TEX Certified Development Corporation, and is a founder and
President of Central Texas Recycling Association, a marketing cooperative for
rural cities and counties.
❑ Tom Reid Mayor, City of Pearland (Region 14), where he was reelected to
May 1996. Mayor Reid's prior city experience includes 13 years as Mayor, 6
years as a councilmember. Mayor Reid served as President of TML Region 14
and a member of the TML Board of Directors for 10 years. Mayor Reid has
served as President of AMCC, President of Houston -Galveston Area Council
of Governments and President of the Texas Association of Regional Council of
Governments.
❑ Hartley Sappington, Director of Community Services, City of Georgetown,
Texas (Region 10). He has served in this capacity since 1986 and also serves
as Acting City Manager. He has been active in developing risk management
and safety programs and procedures for the City. Mr. Sappington supervises
the safety sensitive departments for the municipal airport, animal control and
public collection station. He is a member of the Austin Area PRIMA Chapter,
and a member of the City's Emergency Management Team.
❑ Cathy Smith, Councilmember, City of Conroe (Region 14). Ms. Smith has
been a City Councilmember since 1989. She is a member of the HGAC
Transportation Policy Council, and currently serves as Co -Chairperson of the
Transportation Policy Council. Along with many other State and National
Organizations, she has been an active member of Texas Municipal League,
currently holding the position of President, Region 14.
a
Dennis L. Smith, City Manager, City of Brady, Texas (Region 6). He has been
City Manager of Brady since 1995. He previously served as Administrative
Assistant for the Public Works Director and Assistant to the City Manager of
College Station, and Assistant City Manager of Converse, Texas. He is a
graduate of West Chester University in Pennsylvania and has an MPA from
Texas A&M University.
Dwight D. Thompson, Mayor of West Lake Hills, Texas (Region 10), since
May 1996. He previously served as a Councilmember of West Lake Hills for
one year. Mr. Thompson is a graduate of Leadership Arlington and was
Reserve Police Officer of the Year in 1983 in Arlington. He served as a
Member of the Materials and Construction Specifications Subcommittee of the
North Central Texas Council of Governments from 1979-1994. Mr. Thompson
has a JD from Texas Wesleyan University and an MBA from the University of
Dallas.
Wanda Thompson, Councilmember, City of Morton, Texas (Region 3). Ms.
Thompson has served as a councilmember for 10 years. Ms. Thompson has
been involved in the insurance business since 1983, selling crop, life, health,
long term care and dental insurance. She serves on the Board of Directors for
the South Plains Economic Development District, Board of Directors of the
Morton Senior Citizens, Past President of the Women's Cotton Organization and
Past President of the American Business Women Association Chapter.
Victor Vinton is the Mayor of Pearsall, Texas (Region 7). He was first elected
to the Pearsall City Council in 1978 and has served as a councilmember for 14
years. Mr. Vinton was elected Mayor in 1992. Mr. Vinton has served as a
member of several civil and state organizations including committees of the
National League of Cities and National Association of Latino Elected Officials.
Mr. Vinton is a graduate of North Texas State with a Master's degree in
education. Mr. Vinton is currently employed as an educational administrator in
Atascosa County.
William L. Walker, Assistant Secretary, Harris County Municipal Utility
District #151 (Region 14). Mr. Walker has over 25 years in the insurance
industry with two prominent national firms, focusing on public entity business
and the operations of risk pools. Mr. Walker is a member of the Atascocita
Joint Annexation Committee and an active member of the Texas chapter of
Public Risk Management Association. He holds the Associate in Risk
Management designation from the Insurance Institute of America and attended
the University of Connecticut.
WRITE IN CANDIDATE:
It
BALLOT MUST BE SIGNED TO BE COUNTED
I certify that the vote cast above has been cast in accordance with the will of the majority of the
governing body of the public entity named below.
Witness by hand, this day of , 1996.
Signature of Authorized Official
Name of Political Entity
31
Title
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Sean S. Leonard, C-G-S Teen Court Coordinator
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement for funding of the Teen Court Program with the cities of
Colleyville, Grapevine, the Carroll Independent School District and the
Grapevine/Colleyville Independent School District and the addition of the Town
of Trophy Club.
On September 1, 1994, the cities of Colleyville, Grapevine, and Southlake along with the Carroll
and Grapevine/Colleyville Independent School Districts entered into an agreement to create the
Colleyville-Grapevine-Southlake Teen Court program. This joint venture expanded the process
through which juvenile misdemeanor offenders are offered an alternative to the criminal justice
system while allowing them the opportunity to assume responsibility for their own actions by
involvement in the judicial process and community service in order that their offenses will not be
recorded.
As detailed in the 1996-97 Interlocal Agreement, (attachment A) the contract outlines the the CGS
Teen Court Program. This agreement also outlines the development of the CGS Teen Court
Advisory Board, the CGS Teen Court Budget Advisory Committee, and the roles and
responsibilities of each of their members. The accord also authorizes the City of Southlake to
employ a full-time Teen Court Coordinator, provide office space for him and collect revenues
from the other participating Cities and School Districts in order to maintain the program.
The major changes from last year's Interlocal Agreement are the addition of the Town of Trophy
Club as a participating "City" and the provision of office space for the Teen Court Coordinator
by the City of Southlake's instead of the City of Grapevine.
Attached, please find the 1996-97 Interlocal Agreement that must be renewed on a yearly basis
beginning on September 1, 1996 by all participating cities and school districts. However, it has
been recommended that this year's Interlocal Agreement be changed so that it may better coincide
with the city's fiscal calendar year of October 1, 1996 to Sept 30, 1997, The proposed
contribution for this next year has been estimated at approximately $7,700.00 per participating
City and School District.
Please place this on the next City Council Agenda for authorization by the Mayor.
SSL/sl
Attachment: Interlocal Agreement
C:\Wpdoc\Terncoun\Inw1= mmo
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TOWN
OF TROPHY CLUB, CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND
GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
This Contract and Agreement, entered into the day of , 1996, by and
between the City of Colleyville, the City of Grapevine, the City of Southlake, and the Town of
Trophy Club, municipal corporations herein called "Cities" or "each participating City," and the
Carroll Independent School District and the Grapevine/Colleyville Independent School District,
herein called "School Districts" or "each participating School District," the parties acting herein
under the authority and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 791, INTERLOCAL COOPERATION
CONTRACTS, Texas Government Code, WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City Councils of the Cities of Colleyville, Grapevine, Southlake, and
Trophy Club and the Boards of Trustees of the Carroll Independent School District and the
Grapevine/Colleyville Independent School District jointly find that it will be in the public interest
to enter into this agreement for the purposes set out herein below,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between each participating City and each
participating School District that:
1. Teen Court is a volunteer program which allows juvenile misdemeanor offenders
an alternative to the criminal justice system while allowing them also to assume responsibility for
their own actions by involvement in the judicial process and community services in order that their
offenses will not be recorded; bringing juvenile offenders to a jury of their peers and to the
community for constructive punishment will provide the youths with an understanding of the
judicial system and a realization of their roles in the community.
Page 1
2. The community will benefit from this interaction in that, through Teen Court, the
community is afforded a unique opportunity to become involved in the education of juvenile
offenders, as well as juvenile volunteers. Teens, through their active involvement, are afforded
a way to learn how our system of justice works and to realize their roles in the community.
3. A Teen Court Advisory Board shall be appointed by the respective governing
bodies comprised of two (2) members from each participating city and two (2) members from each
participating school district, as each so chooses. The role and duties of the Teen Court Advisory
Board shall be established by the Municipal Court Judges in the participating cities.
4. A Teen Court Budget Advisory Commitee shall be established, comprised of the
city managers of each of the participating cities, and the superintendents of each of the
participating school districts, or their designees. The Budget Advisory Committee shall set the
budget for the Colleyville-Grapevine-Southlake (CGS) Teen Court, including the staffing of the
Teen Court, and shall be responsible for budget oversight of the Court's operations.
5. The City of Southlake shall employ an administrator to administer and coordinate
the activities of the CGS Teen Court program.
6. The selection of the Teen Court Coordinator shall be subject to the approval of the
majority vote of the Teen Court Budget Advisory Committee and the Municipal Court Judges in
the participating cities.
7. Each participating city and school district shall contribute the sum of $
as its contribution to the CGS Teen Court Program, the sum to be paid to the City of Southlake.
8. The Teen Court Coordinator shall be an exempt employee for purposes of Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA) coverage.
Page 2
9. The scope of responsibilities of the Teen Court Coordinator shall be established by
the Budget Advisory Committee and the Municipal Court Judges in the participating cities.
10. This contract shall be for the initial period of one (1) year beginning 1,
1996.
11. Any party hereto may terminate its participation in this agreement without recourse
or liability upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party.
ATTEST:
Carroll Independent School District
City Secretary, City of Colleyville
City Secretary, City of Grapevine
City Secretary, City of Southlake
City Secretary, Town of Trophy Club
Page 3
Grapevine/Colleyville Independent
School District
Mayor, City of Colleyville
Mayor, City of Grapevine
Mayor, City of Southlake
Mayor, Town of Trophy Club
Approved as to form and legality:
City Attorney, City of Colleyville
City Attorney, City of Southlake
Attorney, Carroll Independent School
District
c: \wpdoc\tee ncon\advisory\intrloca.agr/sl
Page 4
City Attorney, City of Grapevine
City Attorney, Town of Trophy Club
Attorney, Grapevine/Colleyville
Independent School District
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Authorization to Advertise for FY95-96 and FY96-97
Seal Coat (Micro -Surfacing) Annual Programs
BACKGROUND
The FY95-96 budget allotted $50,000 to start a "seal coat" program on the asphalt streets which could
be resurfaced before they are in need of complete rehabilitation. Generally these streets range from eight
to twelve years old. There are many different types of "seal coat" methods (i.e., chip seal, micro -
surfacing and slurry seal). City Council recommended not to use the "chip seal" where small crushed
rock is spread over an asphalt application, because of the problem with the chips being thrown by tires
and possibly causing damage to cars. The recommendation from City Council was to use the micro -
surfacing method. This process places a thin asphalt surface, providing a new wear surface and filling
i the small cracks in the old surface. This material can effectively be placed on a street until the ground
and air temperatures fall below 50' F.
DISCUSSION
Staff did advertise and publish the time and place to receive bids for the FY95-96 micro -surfacing
program. At the designated time (August 15, 1996, at 10:00 a.m.), no bids were received. However,
at 10:08 a.m., on August 15, 1996, a bid was delivered to the Administration Office. Because the bid
was late, it was not opened and publicly read. At least three bids were expected as specifications were
requested by three companies. Staff called the companies to try and ascertain why they did not bid. The
main reason was the relative small size of the proposed contract.
Due to no bids received at the designated time, the City Council may authorize the City to enter into a
negotiated contract with the only company that submitted a proposal. The company is willing to do the
work for the proposed price. A second alternative is for the City to rebid.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to advertise to receive bids on both the
FY95-96 and FY96-97 seal coat programs. The streets in which the seal coat program will be applied
in both years are:
A. FY95-96
1. The main streets in the Cross Timbers area:
PK a. Ten Bar Trail 5D-1
b. Wood Brook Lane,
QEMORANDUM
URTIS E. HAWK
CRO-SURFACING
AUGUST 30, 1996
PAGE 2
C. Lakeview Drive
d. Morgan Road
e. Kingswood Drive
B. FY96-97
1. generally to finish
a. Cross Timbers
b. Lake Wood Acres
C. Woodland Heights Addition.
The allocated funds are $50,000 (FY95-96) and $103,100 (FY96-97). This brings the total to $153,100.
Based upon our discussion with contractors, a proposed contract of this size should attract more bids and
at a reduced cost per square yard.
If City Council approves this item, we will advertise for bids on September 8 and 15, 1996, and receive
bids on September 25, 1996. City Council can then consider awarding a bid at their October 1, 1996,
Regular City Council Meeting with the actual micro -surfacing completed yet this fall.
�Wtaff`s recommendation is to place authorization to advertise for FY95-96 and FY96-97 seal coat (micro -
surfacing) annual programs on the Regular City Council Agenda for September 3, 1996, for City Council
consideration.
BW/ls
Attachment: exhibits
C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\STREETS\PUBLIC\MICRO-S.MEM
N
5D-2
City of. Southlake
�' Capital Improvements Projects
CROSS TIMBER HILLS
5D-3
City of Southlake
1, Capital Improvements Projects
Thiseen compiled for The
City �L'MER
ake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this Information. Every effort
was made to insure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee Is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
LAKE WOOD ACRES
Seal Coat
5D-4
I
'I
I
i
l
I
.I
w
T
Public Works - GIS
August 1996
City of Southlake
C'capital Improvements Projects
D R
'his data een compiled for The
'hy of Southlake. Various a111clel
,nd unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Every effort
ras made to Insure the accuracy of
pis data, however, no guarantee Is
liven or implied as to the accuracy
11 said date.
WOODLAND HEIGHTS
•
Seal Coat
5D-5
w f
s
Public Works - GIS
August 1996
City of Southlake, Texas
NZILGIttwalla MIA8_
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager -
FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Award of Change Order No. 1 to Tank Builders, Inc. for the
Architectural Facade to the 5.0 Million Gallon Ground Storage Tank at
Pump Station No. 1 located on Southlake Blvd. near Pearson Lane
BACKGROUND
On July 16, 1996, City Council entered into a contract with the low bidder, Tank Builders, Inc., for the
construction of a 5.0 million gallon steel ground storage tank (previously referred to as the Pearson Lane
Ground Storage Tank). In considering the tank contract, City Council was presented with three methods
to "beautify" the steel tank. City Council instructed staff to define the cost estimates with their
recommendation at a later date.
Staff has worked with Cheatham and Associates and Arthur Weinman Architects on this project. The
hree methods of "beautification", the costs and discussion as per. the designs presented to City Council
-on July 16, 1996, follows:
The estimated cost is $9.00/s.f. or approximately $150,000. The approximate life will be 12 years.
The estimate cost is $12.00/s.f. or approximately $200,000. The approximate life will be 10 years.
A proposed cost from Tank Builders, Inc. is $163,340. The "life" of this treatment will be the same
as the tank which is estimated to be 50 years or more with periodic painting approximately every 10
years due to fading.
DISCUSSION
The acrylic membrane on a water tank would be a new application similar to the method used on buses.
A negative point to this method is that hail could damage the membrane, however, only the damaged
panels would have to be replaced. Even though the average estimated life is 12 years not all of the
membrane panels would have to be replaced after the 12 years.
5E-1
MEMORANDUM
CURTIS E. HAWK
PUMP STATION NO. 1, CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
AUGUST 30, 1996
PAGE 2
The painted image would be also subject to hail damage and fading over time. Therefore based upon the
estimated life of 10 years, the entire tank would need to be repainted with the masonry image at
approximately the same cost as the original application.
The welded steel treatment would last the life of the tank. The paint would need to be redone
approximately every 10 years because of fading. This cost is estimated at $60,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Tank
Builders, Inc. for the architectural treatment for welded steel facade to the tank, including variations of
paint colors. Staff will have a colored rendering of this design at the September 3, 1996, Regular City
Council Meeting. The Change Order No. 1 is for $20,880 for additional earthwork for relocation of the
tank, as previously approved by City Council. The architectural treatment is for $163,340 for a total
Change Order No. 1 of $184,220.
Staff's recommendation is to place the award of Change Order No. 1 to Tank Builders, Inc. for the
architectural facade to the 5.0 million gallon ground storage tank at Pump Station No. 1 located on
Southlake Blvd. near Pearson Lane on the September 3, 1996, Regular City Council Agenda for City
Council consideration.
BW/ls
Attachment: Change Order No. 1
Tank Builders, Inc. Proposed Cost
Architectural Exhibits
C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\WATER\TANK\PEARSON\CHG-0I.MEM
5E-2
A
No. 7 1
CHANGE ORDER
Dated: August 28, 1996
OWNER's Project No. 001-518 ENGINEER'S Project No. 001-518
Project Water System Improvements S Million Gallon Ground Storage Tank Booster Pump Station Site No I
OWNER City of Southlake
Contract For. Water System Improvements 5 Million Gallon Tank Booster Pump Station Site No I
Contract Date: August 2. 1996 To: Tank Builders, Inc.
Contractor
You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract:
Citof Southlake
Owner
By
Dated , 1996
Nature of the Changes:
See support documentation from contractor.
1. Additional earthwork for relocation of tank on new site $ 20, 880.00
2. Architectural treatment for welded steel facade to tank, including
variations of paint colors. 163, 340.00
Additions $184, 220.00
These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time:
Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 746, 680.00
Net Increase Resulting from This Change Order $ 184, 220. 00
Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 930, 900. 00
NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B (1978 Edition)
Page 1 of 2
5E-3
Contract Time Prior to This Change 365 D=
(Days or Date)
co,
Net Resulting from This Change Order No Change
(Days)
Current Contract Time Including This Change Order
(Days or Date)
The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham & Associates
Enginar`�
By
Date August 28 , 1996
The Above Changes Are Accepted: Tank Builders. Inc.
Co. -
By
Date August 28 , 1996
F:%WORD\,SOUTHLAKXS l g\atange.ord t. wpd
(aw Page 2 of 2
5E-4
TANK BUILDERS, INC.
AW
P.O. BOX 1527
EULESS, TEXAS 76039
(817) 571-4044 Metro ^27677-4433
7 �
1601 E. L,a�,s� eL LIV, 577E ZOO
Azc,..JS 7VAJ 7-x, 7Go/l
GENTLEMEN:
(LCEcffcff[E[2 OG' 4 ° &MMODUQL
DATE �
JOB NO.
ATTENTION
RE:
/y)
�JOG/T7 Lq lG� -7k.
WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttached
❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
izo,�os•� sr
/J-o/�ws.�.lc
2oPos� /Z G H /./� �✓/L S T �✓2rS / ill �
��]]L
P/c4POS�0 /Z. V /L /yL T OAS / ,U
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
) requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN YO US
/S
RM
/U.s;uJ
S/ 97JE /s
44SO
0,0
xel-oy' 02 y SH•f�T"
//d d S ,46So XA0 9-1� � � ilXT/g wC� S� , �T, 77,
GO A 7-E 0 4A/p 'St /S1CA: O& T
_, l'/LiC.t, 7a 7a/' COdr— Gt//f''£�CI i✓��rJ j
COPY
SIGNED:
If enclosures are no5F"_S led, kindly notify us at once.
• TANK BUILDERS, INC.
AW
P.O. BOX 1527
EULESS, TEXAS 76039
(817) 571-4044 Metro 267-4433
TO
�weCrNA� AZ.
ssOO', ,
zoo
7
�.ucin�N , Tx, -? & oil
GENTLEMEN:
ILIEVVIEa ors VaMOkOUT AL
T,4T
GATE
ATTENTION
RE:
� � may: ��iu�u�l S7ZJoz/✓✓!'
F
WE ARE SENDING YOU ) Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of .letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
����--••.D�sr.�T�c.vs l�gr.�c� o�/ � /s/- �� •�'.� fr%,scrrc/
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
XAs requested
- ❑ - For review and comment
❑. Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO 1JS
REMARKS
/ /lam /Litw/T�'/l�(/�
SF-(
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once.
c :10 ( oN'ZY -)W Q'S
ILL "3��b'1+LLnps Jo "�D 719
o
5:
"OHnum
vm • l vw
m•. l(r.
MMI Ww& OOK
�ue�
IN
m
5E-8
m�rov
awn w�aas
Jyuff;
Mp
.OM«WWII n
tea Wo I•.
0�1 am
/►�� 1 '/���.� a�.soamid
o�6-8
-Y
u
.
N a
�
c
�
s �
�p
tq
=
I
x
N
q
5E-9
City of Southlake, Texas
August 29, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 665, 2nd reading, Fiscal Year 1996-97 Operating
Budget, Second Public Hearing
Presented for City Council consideration is the second reading on the FY1996-97 operating budget
ordinance. This budget summarizes the plan of muni ' 1 operations for the fiscal year that begins
October 1, 1996. The Council was presented a budg te`yv ork book on August 9. The summary
budget information attached to Ordinance 665 reflects the detail included in the budget work book.
The summary budget information also incorporates a proposed Capital Projects Budget for the
FY1996-97 year. The Capital Projects are major water, sewer, street, park, and drainage
infrastructure items that are funded through a variety of sources, such as impact fees, operating
fund transfers, developer fees, and bond proceeds.
A public hearing on the budget is also on the agenda, which gives the public an opportunity to
speak on the budget. Ordinance 665 was approved on first reading at the August 20 Council
meeting. Please place the ordinance on the September 3 agenda for consideration.
LAH
A:\BDGT2ND. WPD
ORDINANCE NO. 665
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING REVISED BUDGET
(ow, FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96; APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1996, AND TERMINATING
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS
FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT AND ACCOUNT;
REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 1995-96
budget and submitted same to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as
the "City") has caused to be filed with the City Secretary a budget to cover all proposed
expenditures of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996, and
ending September 30, 1997, (hereinafter referred to as the "Budget"); and
WHEREAS, the Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" . and
incorporated herein for all purposes, shows as definitely as possible each of the various projects
for which appropriations are set up in the Budget, and the estimated amount of money carried in
the Budget for each of such projects; and
WHEREAS, the Budget has been filed with the City Secretary for at least thirty (30) days
and available for inspection by any taxpayer; and
WHEREAS, public notice of public hearings on the proposed annual budget, stating the
dates, times, places and subject matter of said public hearings, was given as required by the
Charter of the City of Southlake and the laws of the State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such public hearings were held on August 20, 1996 and September 3, 1996,
prior approval of such dates being hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Council, and all those
wishing to speak on the Budget were heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the Budget and listened to the comments of the
taxpayers at the public hearings held therefor and has determined that the Budget attached hereto
is in the best interest of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1 That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are
incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety.
(60",
Section 2 That the revised figures, resprepared and submitted b Y the City Manager for
P P
716-4
Ordinance No. 665
Page 2
the 1995-96 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and
any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and
appropriated.
Section 3. That the Budget attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for
all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 1996, and ending September 30,
1997; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations,
activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget.
Section 4 That the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy
of the approved Budget, along with this ordinance, with the City Secretary and in the office of the
County Clerks of Denton and Tarrant County, Texas, as required by State law.
Section That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or
provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to
the extent of conflict herewith.
Section If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in. this
Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional
by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such
remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall
remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next
fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take
effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of
1996.
Rick Stacy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this
1996.
day of
9
Ordinance No. 665
Page 3
C�
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date:
Adopted:
Effective:
IL\WP-FUXMRO-RaACaW-BGr.ORD/ bb
Rick Stacy, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED BUDGET 1996-97
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
Special
Revenue
General Debt Service Utility
Parks/
Eurld Fund Fund
Recreation
SPDC
Total
Projected Revenues-FY96-97
$8,970,548 $2,285,094 $6,336,650
$105,500
$967,000
$18,664,792
Less Projected Expenditures
$10,576.227 $1.683,946 $6.532,118
$122.000
$400,799
$19,315,090
Total-Expenditures-FY96-97
$10,576,227 $1,683,946 $6,532,118
$122,000
$400,799
$19,315,090
C O Proceeds
920,000 0 0
0
0
920,000
Net Transfers In (Out)
633-000 (527 898) fi5-M
(5&875)
Q
113,397
Net Revenues
Estimated Fund Balance/
Working Capital 9/30/96 $1,669,416 $472,913 $1,233,780 $76,762 $996,488 $4.449,359
Estimated Fund Balance/
Working Capital 9/30197 $1,616,737 $546.163 $1,103,482 $3,387 $1,562,689 $4,832,458
1995-96
1995-96
1996-97
$Increase/
Expenditures
1994-95
Actual
Adopted
Budget
Revised
Budget
Proposed
Budget
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
General Fund
Personnel
$3,960,852
$4,853,826
$4,926,733
$6.075,068
$1.221,242.
25.2%
Operations
2.171,523
2,435,242
2,844,677
3,360.706
925,464
38.0%
Capital Outlay
908274
580,530
776.768
1,140,453
559,923
96.5%
Total Expenditures
$7.040.649
$7,869,598
$8.548,178
$10,576,227
$2,706,629
34.4%
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service
$1,22&385
$1.464.333
SJ-476.296
31M3,946
S219,613
15.0%
Total Expenditures
$1,228,385
$1,464,333
$1,476,296
$1,683,946
$219,613
15.0%
Utility Fund
Personnel
$454,653
$603.708
$627.708
$590,250
($13,458)
-2.2%
Operations
3,488,334
4,013,522
4,882,296
3,842,100
(171,422)
-4.3%
Capital Outlay
526,002
587,080
495,444
651,720
64,640
11.0%
Debt Service
193,278
197.762
771,137
1,448,048
1,250,286
632.2%
Total Expenses
$4,662,267
$5,402.072
$6,776,585
$6•,532,118
$1.130,046
20.9%
Special Revenue-Parks/Recreation
$75,440
$30.000
$45,299
$0
($30,000)
-100.0%
Operations
Capital Outlay
105-739
108,000
163,600
122-000
14,000
13.0%
Total Expenditures
$181.179
$138,000
$208,899
$122,000
($16,000)
-11.6%
SPDC
Personnel
$49,971
$47,680
$50,190
$50.229
$2,549
5.3%
Operations
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
0
100.0%
Capital Outlay
0
0
0
0
0
0.0%
Debt Service
259,716
364,200
36C200
345,770
(18430)
-5.1%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$314,487
$416,680
$419.190
$400,799
($15,881)
-3.8%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $13.42&967 S15290.683 S17-429.148 $19.315.090 $4.024.407 26.3%
Ic
Page I
�� S
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED BUDGET 1996-97
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES BY FUND/CATEGORY
1995-96
1995-96
1996-97
1994-95
Adopted
Revised
Adopted
FUND
Actual
Budge i
Budget
Budget
General Fund
Personnel
3,960,852
4,853.826
4,926,733
6,075.068
Operations
2,171,523
2,435,242
2,844,677
3,360,706
Capital Outlay
908,274
580.530
776,768
1,140,453
Total
7,040,649
7,869,598
8,548,178
10,576,227
Debt $ervice Fund
Debt Service
Total
Utility Fund
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Total
Special Revenue-
�arks/Recreation Fund
erations
pital Outlay
Total
SPDC Fund
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Total
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS
A
1,228,385 1,464,333 1,476,296 1,683,946
1,228,385 1,464,333 1,476,296 1,683,946
$ Increase/
% Increase/
(Decrease)
-Decrease
Adopted
Adopted
1.221,242
25.2%
925,464
38.0%
559,923
96.5%
2,706,629
34.4%
219,613 15.0%
219,613 15.0%
454,653
603,708
627,708
590,250
(13,458)
-2.2%
3,488,334
4,013,522
4,882,296
3,842,100
(171,422)
-4.3%
526,002
587,080
495,444
651,720
64,640
11.0%
193,278
197,762
771,137
1,448,048
1,250,286
632.2%
4,662,267
5,402,072
6,776,585
6,532,118
1,130,046
20.9%
75,440
30,000
45,299
0
(30,000)
-100.0%
105,739
108,000
163,600
122,000
14,000
13.0%
181,179
138,000
208,899
122,000
(16,000)
-11.6%
49,971
47,680
50,190
50,229
2,549
5.3%
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
0
100.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0.0%
259,716
364,200
364,200
345,770
(18,430)
-5.1%
314,487
416,680
419,190
. 400,799
(15,881)
-3.8%
13,426,967
15,290,683
17,429,148
19,315,090
4,024,407
26.3%
4,465,476 5,505,214 5,604,631 6,715,547 1,210,333
5,740,097 6,483,564
7,777,072 7,207,606
724,042
1,540,015 1,275,610
1,435,812 1,914.173
638,563
1,681,379 2.026 295
2,611,633 3,477,764
1,451,469
13,426.967 15,290,683
17,429,148 19,315,090
4,024,407
7,d
Page 2
22.0%
11.2%
50.1 %
71.6%
26.3%
EXHIBIT "A" `
S
GENERALFU
City Secretary
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Human Resou
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
City Manager':
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Economic Deg
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Municipal Court
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Fire Services
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
PROPOSED BUDGET 1996-97
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY
1995-96
1995-96
1996-97
$ Increase/
1994-95
Adopted
Revised
Adopted
(Decrease)
Actual
Budget
Budget
Budget
Adopted
69,297
77,102
88,477
98,903
21,801
113,381
127,273
150,673
154,463
27,190
15,049
6.518
9.618
S W77
32
197,727
210,893
248,768
260,253
49,360
0
0
0
44,294
44,294
0
0
0
51,716
51,716
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
96,010
96,010
270,509
283,032
314,152
389,989
106,957
50,927
70,680
79,550
49,613
(21,067)
26.870
0
16.400
6.700
6.700
348,306
353,712
410,102
446,302
92,590
46,661
63,433
63,433
63,887
454
51,645
61,430
61,430
50,995
(16,435)
m
1,950
1,950
a
(1-950)
98,694
126,813
126,813
114.882
(11,931)
23,769
26,665
26,019
28,218
1,553
639,726
694,295
882,817
937,792
243,497
42,993
94,890
71,300
79,150
(15,740)
706,488
815,850
980,136
1,045,160
229,310
169,998
193,831
194,935
238,462
44,631
87,699
102,075
108,164
135,379
33,304
12M
0
106,909
LmQ
zim
258,981
295,906
410,008
381,591
85,685
103,680
146,155
146,155
157,361
11,206
95,093
91,920
95,350
111,115
19,195
3-m
4"
Z,166
a w
(8501
201.965
242,475
248,671
272,026
29,551
596,438
668,656
720,106
893,272
224,616
73,266
114,169
85,360
146150
90,259
175,429
273,563
90,069
783,873
900,166
146150
956,515
1,342,264
127,413
442,098
% Increase/
-Decrease
Adopted
28.3%
21.4%
5.7%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
37.8%
-29.8%
100.0%
26.2%
0.7%
-17.0%
0.0%
-9.4%
5.8%
35.1 %
-16.6%
28.1 %
23.0%
32.6%
0.0%
29.0%
7.7%
20.9%
-19.3%
12.2%
33.6%
105.5%
87.2%
49.1 %
Page 3
It
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED
BUDGET 1996-97
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY
1995-96
1995-96
1996-97
$ Increase/
% Increase/
1994-95
Adopted
Revised
Adopted
(Decrease)
-Decrease
GENERAL FUND
Actual
Budget
Budget
Budget
Adopted
Adopted
Police Services
Personnel
983,528
1,190,194
1,135,194
1,617,572
427,378
35.9%
Operations
131,449
169,758
179,058
248,575
78,817
46.4%
Capital Outlay
189,868
87.6 15
96,800
281,703
194,088
221.5%
Total
1,304,845
1,447,567
1,411,052
2,147,850
700,283
48.4%
Public Safety Support
Personnel
481,918
664,779
690,779
707,761
42,982
6.5%
Operations
66,552
148,745
154,090
175,549
26,804
18.0%
Capital Outlay
60,410
29,600
32,100
52,642
23,042
77.8%
Total
Building Inspection
608,880
843,124
876,969
935,952
92,828
11.0%
Personnel
247,112
295,516
295,516
352,464
56,948
19.3%
Operations
53.315
80,003
80,003
72,140
(7,863)
-9.8%
Capital Outlay
29,220
9.650
9.650
29,000
19.350
200.5%
Total
329,647
385,169
385,169
453.604
68,435
17.8%
Streets/Drainage
Personnel
420,503
465,216
465,216
420,063
(45,153)
-9.7%
Operations
393,788
374,881
363,350
377,055
2,174
0.6%
Capital Outlay
244,147
99,100
99.200
99.800
ZQQ
0.7%,
'',tal
r
1,058,438
939,197
927,766
896,918
(42,279)
-4.5%
ersonnel
200,061
266,852
266,888
390,689
123,837
46.4%
Operations
117,874
176,475
177,620
231,461
54,986
31.2%
Capital Outlay
41,688
Q
2,306
101,338
101,338
100.0%
Total
359,623
443,327
446,814
723,488
280,161
63.2%
Parks and Recreation
Personnel
116.713
211,773
188,681
289,721
77,948
36.8%
Operations
149,331
167,167
286,564
464,679
297,512
178.0%
Capital Outlay
123,817
95,127
127,430
198,370
103,243
108.5%
Total
Community Development
389,861
474,067
602,684
952,770
478,703
101.0%
Personnel
230,665
300,622
331,182
382,412
81,790
27.2%
Operations
147,477
85,180
135,749
124,745
39,565
46.4%
Capital Outlay
15,179
-5-=
49,780
Q
(5,530)
-100.0%
Total
393,321
391,332
516,711
507,157
115,825
29.6%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
7,040,649
7,869,598
8,548,178
10,576,227
2,706,629
34.4%
DEBT SERVICE FUND
Debt Service
1,228,385
1,464,333
1,476,296
1,683,946
219,613
15.0%
Total
1,228,385
1,464,333
1,476,296
1,683,946
219,613
15.0%
�TAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,228,385
1,464,333
1,476,296
1,683,946
219,613
15.0%
Page 4
EXHIBIT "A" `
L
UTILITY FUND
Water Utilities
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Wastewater Uti
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Sanitation
Personnel
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
Non -De ap rtmer
Other
Debt Service
Total
TOTAL UTILITY FUND
SPECIAL REVENUE-
PARKS/RECREATION FUND
Operations
Capital Outlay
Total
SPDC FUND
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Total
GRAND TOTAL
PROPOSED BUDGET 1996-97
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES BY FUND/DIVISION/CATEGORY
1995-96
1995-96
1996-97
1994-95
Adopted
Revised
Adopted
Actual
Budget
Budget
Budges
360,270
495,225
515,225
460,242
1,940,016
2,316,712
3,115,968
2,883,235
437,513
556,166
464,530
512,720
2,737,799
3,368,103
4,095,723
3,856,197
94,383
108,483
112.483
130,008
1,198,035
1,318,810
1,374,328
475,865
88,489
30,914
30,914
139,000
1,380,907
1,458,207
1,517,725
744,873
0
0
0
0
350,283
378.000
392,000
483,000
4
4
0
4
350,283
378,000
392,000
483,000
0 0 0 0
193,278 197,762 771,137 1,448 048
193,278 197,762 771,137 1,448,048
4,662,267 5,402,072 6,776,585 6,532,118
75,440 30,000 45,299 0
105,739 108,000 163,600 122,000
181,179 138,000 208,899 122,000
49,971 47,680 50,190 50,229
4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800
0 0 0 0
314,487 416,680 419,190 400,799
13,426,967 15,290,683 17,429,148 19,315,090
71
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
(34,983)
566,523
(43,446)
488,094
21,525
(842,945)
108,086
(713.334)
0
105,000
0
105.000
% Increase/
-Decrease
Adopted
-7.1 %
24.5%
-7.8%
14.5%
19.8%
-63.9%
349.6%
-48.9%
0.0%
27.8%
0.0%
27.8%
0
0.0%
1,250,286
632.2%
1,250,286
632.2%
1,130,046
20.9%
(30,000)
-100.0%
14,000
13.0%
(16,000)
-11.6%
2,549
0
0
(18,430)
(15,881)
4,024,407
5.3%
100.0%
0.0%
-5.1 %
100.0%
Page 5
26.3%
W,
EXHIBIT "A"
(4210e ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
REVENUES
Ad Valorem Taxes
Sales Tax
Franchise Fees
Fines
Charges for Services
Permits/Fees
Miscellaneous
Water Sales -residential
Water Sales-ccmmeraai
Wastewater Sales
Sanitation Sales
Other Utility Charges
Interest Income
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES
City Secretary
Human Resources
City Manager
Economic Development
Support Services
General Gov Total
once
IL icipal Court
NlWance Total
Fire
Police
Public Safety Support
Public Safety Total
Building Inspections
Streets/Drainage
Public Works Admin
Water
Wastewater
Sanitation
Public Works Total
Parks and Recreation
Community Dev. Total
Other
Debt Service
Total Expenditures
Not Revers»s
Proceeds from C.O. Sale/other
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Total 011m Sarcas (Uses)
Bepmim Fuid Balance
Reserved Fund BaMnee
Fsdry Fund Balance
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Ado ted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$.422/$100
1996-97
Proposed
..np..w,.
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
oarz9Ae
% Increase/
-Decrease
$3.841,660
$4,561,665
$4.623,600
$61.935
1.4%
$5,606,556
$1.044.891
22.9%
1,550,251
2.011,500
2,283.195
271,695
13.5%
2,769,000
757,500
37.7%
481.616
516,715
509,252
(7,463
-1.4%
636,397
119,682
23.2%
278,290
260.400
391,600
131,200
50.4%
353,600
93,200
35.8%
104,957
94,800
207,600
112,800
119.0%
279,850
185,050
195.2%
2,060.824
1,953,335
2,580,960
627,625
32.1%
2,349.310
395,975
20.3%
262.701
159,275
223.077
63.802
40.1%I
191,079
31,804
20.0%
3.051,223
3.355,175
4,500.000
1.144,825
34.1%1
4,250,000
894,825
26.7%
511,344
687.000
537.000
(150.000
-21.8%I
475.000
(212,000
-30.9%
511,901
610.000
649.000
39.000
6.4%
590,000
(20,000
-3.3%
396.761
420.000
435.000
15,000
3.6%
508.000
88,000
21.0%
310,156
318,625
380,750
62.125
19.5%
359,000
40,375
12.7%
355,718
28&000
295,150
10,150
3.6%
297,000
12.000
4.2%
$13,717,402
S15.233.490
$17.616,184
S2-382-694
15.6%
S18.664.792
S3.431.302
22.5%
$197,727
$210,893
$248,768
$37,875
18.0%
$260,253
$49,360
23.4%
0
0
0
0
0.0%
96,010
96,010
100.0%
348,306
353,712
410,102
56,390
15.9%
446,302
92,590
26.2%
98,694
126,813
126,813
0
0.0%
114,862
(11,931
-9.4%
706,488
815,850
980,136
164,286
20.1%
1.045A60
229,310
28.1%
$1,351,215
S1.507.268
$1,766,819
$258,561
17.2%
S1,9U.607
S455.339
30.2%
258.981
295,906
410,008
114.102
38.6%
381;584
85,685
29.0%
201,965
242,475
248,671
6.196
2.6%
272,026
29,551
12.2%
S460.946
S538.381
$658,679
$120,298
22.3%
S653as17
$115,236
21.46%,
783,873
900,166
956,515
56,349
6.3%
1,342,264
442,098
49.1%
1,304,845
1,447.567
1,411,052
(36,515
-2.5%
2,147,850
700,283
48.4%
608,880
843,124
876,969
33,845
4.0%
935252
92,828
11.0%
S2.697.598
$3,190,857
S3.244.536
$53,679
1.7%
$4A26.066
S7.235.209
38.7%
329.647
385,169
385,169
0
0.0%
453,604
68,435
17.8%
1.058.438
939,197
927,766
(11,431
-1.2%
896.918
(42,279
-4.5%
359,623
443,327
446,814
3,487
0.8%
723,488
280,161
63.2%
2.737,799
3,368,103
4,095,723
727,620
21.6%
3,856,197
488,094
14.5%
1.380,907
1,458,207
1,517,725
59,518
4.1%
744,873
(713,334
-48.9%
350,283
378,000
392,000
14,000
3.7%
9$ ;QQQ
105,000
27.8%
S6.216.697
S6.972.003
S7.765:197
$793.194
11.4%
$7,168,080
$186.077
2.7%
625,811
664,547
866,573
202,026
30.4Y.
1,129399
465,252
70.0%
$393,321
$391,332
5516:71t
$125,379
32.0%
$607,167
$115,825
29.6%
0
0
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
1,681,379
2,026,295
2,611,633
585,338
28.9%
3,477,764
1,451,469
71.6%
$13,426,967
$15,290,683
$17,429-148
$187,036
$2,138,465
14.0%
$19,316,090
4,024,407
26.3%
$445.500
$330,000
$100,202
S244.229
($229,798
$920,000
$590,000
$1.167,734
$1.343,235
$1.393,205
$49,970
$1,732,815
$389.580
88
$4.637,152
$5.358.163.
,$5.358,163
S1.033:397
$4,449,359
S1.543.768
$493,321
55.358.163
$0
54.790.599
$0
54.449.359
$0
54.832:458
Page 6
7,&-14o
EXHIBIT "A"
REVENUES
Ad Valorem Taxes
Sales Tax
Franchise Fees
Fines
Charges for Services
Permits/Fees
Miscellaneous
Interest Income
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES
City Secretary
Human Resources
City Manager
Economic Development
Support Services
General Gov Total
Finance
Municipal Court/Teen Court
Finance Total
Fire
Police
Public Safety Support
Public Safety Total
Building Inspections
Streets/Drainage
Public Works Admin
Public Works Total
Parks and Recreation
Community Dev. Total
Total Expenditures
Net Revemws
Proceeds from C.O. S&1@10dw
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Total Other Sources (Uses)
Segirnng Furl Balance
Reserved Fund Baleme
Fs6ng Fled Balance
Fund balance pereentage•CK
GENERAL FUND
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
97.9ndd 4 Mr -AM
$ Increase/
$.422/$100
$ Increase/
1994-95
1995-96
1995-96
(Decrease)
% Increase/
1996-97
(Decrease)
% Increase/
Actual
Adopted
Revised
Adopted
-Decrease
Proposed
Adopted
-Decrease
$2.375.342
$2.888,600
$2,898,600
$10,000
0.3%
$3,357,212
$468,612
19.7%
1,033,501
1,341,000
1.522,130
181.130
13.5%
1,846,000
505,000
48.9%
481,616
516,715
509,252
(7,463
-1.4%
636,397
119.682
24.9%
278,290
260,400
39f,600
131,200
50.4%
353,600
93,200
33.5%
104,957
94,800
207.600
112,800
119.0%
279.850
185,050
176.3%
1.901,245
1.853.335
2.455,960
602.625
32.5%
2,249,310
395,975
20.8%
73,823
74,075
105,637
31,562
42.6%
105.179
31,104
42.1%
126,907
120.000
120,000
0_
0.0%�
143.000
23,000
18.1%
$6,375,681
$7,148,925,
$8,210,779
$1,061,864
14.9%
$8,970,548
$1,821,623
28.6%
$197.727
$210,893
$248,768
$37,875
18.0%
$260,253
$49,360
23.4%
0
0
0
0
0.0%
96,010
96,010
100.0%
348,306
353,712
410,102
56,390
15.9%
446,302
92,590
26.2%
98,694
126,813
126,813
0
0.0%
114,882
(11,931
-9.4%
706.488
815,850
980,136
164,286
20.1%
1,045,160
229,310
28.1%
S1.351.215
$1,507,268
$1,766,819
S258.551
17.2%
S1.962.607
S455.339
30.2%
258,981
295,906
410,008
114,102
38.6%
381,591
85,685
29.0%
201.965
242,475
248,671
U.20
2.6%
272,026
29,551
12.2%
$460,946
$538,381
S658.679
S120.298
22.3%
S653.617
S115.236
21.4e/6
783,873
900,166
956,515
56,349
6.3%
1,342264
442.098
49.1%
1,304,845
1,447,567
1,411.052
(36,51
-2.5%
2,147,850
700,283
48.4%
608,880
843,124
876,969
33,845
4.0%
935,952
92,828
11.0%
S2.697.598
$3,190,857
53.244.536
S53.679
1.7%
$4A26:b66
$1,235,209
38.7%
329,647
385,169
385,169
0
0.0%
453,604
68,435
17.8%
1,058,438
939,197
927,766
(11,431
-1.2%
896,918
(42,279
-4.5%
359,623
443,327
446 814
3.487
0.8%
723.4W
280.161
63.2%
$1,747.708
$1,767,693
S1.769.749
fS7,944
-0.4%
S2.074410
$306,317
17.3%
$389,861
S474.067
S602.684
S128.617
27.1%
S952.770
$478,703
101.0%
S393.321
S391.332
$616,711
S125.379
32.0%
S607,157
S115.825
29.6%
$7,040,649
$7,869 598
$8 648,178
$678,580
8.6%
$10,576 227
$2 706,629
34.4%
$445,500
$330,000
$100202
5383.274
($229,7981,
$920;000
496,360
556,600
, 594607
38,007
633,000
S318.860
S886,600
S317.52
51.553.000
$1,542,081
$1,689,294
$1,689,294
$1,669,416
$493.321
S1.689.294
$0
S1.855.221
$0
S1.669,416
$0
S1.616.737
23.99%1
23.57%1
19.53%
15.29%
7,6 i1
Page 7
lk
P]
EXHIBIT "A"
REVENUES
Ad Valorem Taxes
Interest Income
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES
Principal
Interest
Admin. Expenses
Total Expenditures
Net Revenrwe
Trrn,en In
TrorMv OW
Tow ottw sovcWUses)
Begin" Fund Somme
Endrq Fund Somme
(W
DEBT SERVICE FUND
1996-97 Proposed
p ed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget ,o:a.,,n
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$.4221$100
1996-97
Proposed
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$1,466,318
$1,673,065
$1,725.000
$51.935
3.1%
$2249.344
$576,279
34.4%
34,721
30,000
'44.0Q4
10,000
33.3%
35,750
5.750
19.2%
$1,501,039
$1,703,066
$1,765,000
$61,935
3.6%
$2,285,094
$682,029
34.2%
$665,000
$891,500
$891.500
$0
0.0%
$947.350
$55,850
6.3%
561.215
570.833
582.796
11,963
2.1%
734,096
163,263
28.6%
2-M
LM
2 444
4
0.0%
2.M
544
25.0%
$1,228,385
$272,6554
$1,464,333
i238,732
$1,476,296
5288.704
$11,963
549.972
0.8%
$1,683,946
$219,613
15.0%
53,725
55.556
67,519
$601,148
56,875
$362.416
(197,860
(195,64
(183,684)
(527,898
$293,099
$367.893
$367,893
5410M
$367,893
S472.913
$472,913
S546-1
716-/Z
Page 8
EXHIBIT "A"
REVENUES
Miscellaneous
Interest Income
Water Sales -residential
Water Sales -commercial
Sewer Sales
Sanitation Sales
Other utility charges
Total Revenues
EXPENSES
Omer
Debt Service -Reveres Bonds
Water
Sewer
Sanitation
Total Expenses
Not Revenues
Transfers In
TrarkOws Out
Tolal Ottw Soirees (Uses)
Not chmps In wlc con porwrts
Seonmv few tiWamo
En ft few DeYnce
No. of days rwrkir9 capital
UTILITY FUND
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
1996-97
Proposed
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$188,878
$85,200
$102,900
$17,700
20.8%
$85,900
$700
0.8%
142.490
90,000
90,000
0
0.0%
68,750
(21,250
-23.6%
3,051,223
3,355,175
4,500,000
1.144.825
34.1 %
4,250.000
894,825
26.7%
511,344
687,000
537.000
(150,000
-21.8%
475,000
(212,000
-30.9%
511,901
610,000
649,000
39.000
6.4%
590,000
(20.000
-3.3%
396,761
420,000
435,000
15.000
3.6%
508,000
88.000
21.0%
310,156
318,625
380,750
62,125
19.5%
359.000
40,375
12.7%
$5,112,753
$5,566,000
$6,694,650
$1,128,650
20.3%
$6,336,660
$770,660
13.8%
$0
$0
$0
$0
0.0%
$0
$0
0.0%
193,278
197.762
771.137
573,375
289.9%
1.448,048
1.250,286
632.2%
2,737,799
3.368,103
4,095,723
727,620
21.6%
3,856,197
488,094
14.5%
1.380,907
1,458.207
1,517,725
59,518
4.1 %
744,873
(713,334
-48.9%
350,283
378,000
392,000
14,000
3.7%
483"000
1 D010
27.8%
$4,662,267
S450.466
$5.402.072
S163.928
S6.776.586
$1,374,513
25.4%
$6,532,118
$1,130,046
20.9%
$366,339
$367.879
$367,879
$698,1,70
(183,74
(1,201,324
(1,187,677,65,174
i Yir,
$2.236,651
S2.503.392
$2,503,392
S1.465.996
$2,503,392
S1233.780
51,233i780
51.103:482
196
99
66
62'
Page 9
I C
It
EXHIBIT "A"
REVENUES
Permits/Fees
Miscellaneous
Interest
Total Revenues
Parks and Recreation
Park Improvements
Land
Total Expenditures
Net Revenues
Bond proceeds
Trsroler to otnw told
Total OVw SovcoWses)
SegnnoV Fund Somme
Em" Fund Somme
(W
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
Parks/Recreation
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
1996-97
Proposed
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
ue,�srsa
% Increase/
-Decrease
$159,579
$100,000
$125,000
$25,000
25.0%
$100,000
$0
0.0%
0
0
14.540
14,540
100.0%
0
0
0.0%
17,854
SL=
2.5%
�,QQQ
-8.3%
$177,433
$106,000
$145,690
$39,690
37.4%
$106,600
($500
-0.5%
$181.179
$33,000
$45,299
$12.299
37.3%
0
(33.000
-100.0%
0
80.000
88,600
8,600
10.8%
0
(80.000
-100.0%
9
25,000
75,000
50,000
200.0%
122,000
97,000
388.0%
$181,179
$138,000
$208,899
$70,899
51.4%
$122,000
($16,000
-11.6%
($3,746
($32,000
($63,209
($31,209
($16,500
$15,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
3Q
1Q
�9
$0
$0
$0
($56,87
$143.717
S139.971
$139,971
U4.Z.,iZ1
$139,971
$76"7s2
$76,762
$3.387
Page 10
EXHIBIT "A"
REVENUES
Sales Tax
Interest
Total Revenues
Personnel
Operations
Capital
Total Expenditures
Net Revenws
Tr"ers Out
Proceeds from O.O. sale
Total Odw Sources (Uses)
Begu inq Fund BaWuee
Fsdnp Fund SaWue
SPDC - OPERATING FUND
Parks/Recreation
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
1996-97
Proposed
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$516.750
$670,500
$761.065
$90.565
13.5%
$923,000
$252.500
37.7%
17,726
21,000
21,000
Q
0.0%
22,000
1.000
4.8%
$534,476
$691,500
$782,065
$90,565
13.1%
$945,000
$252,500
36.5%
$49,971
$47,680
$50.190
$2,510
5.3%
$50,229
$2.549
5.3%
4,800
4,800
4,800
0
0.0%
4.800
0
0.0%
0
Q
Q
Q
0.0%
Q
Q
0.0%
$64,771
$52,480
$54,990
$2,510
4.8%
$65,029
$2,549
4.9%
$479,705
$639,020
$727,075
$88,055
$889.971
$250.951
(251,310
(363,200
(405,200)
(344,770
Q
Q
Q
Q
(251,310
(363.200
(405.200)
(344,770
$165.451
$393,846
$393,846
S669.666
$393,846
5715.721
$715,721
S1 26n 922
7.6-1.3-
Page 11
It
I W
EXHIBIT "A"
SPDC - DEBT SERVICE FUND
(41w, Parks/Recreation
1996-97 Proposed Budget and 1995-96 Revised Budget 10:04AM
REVENUES
Interest Income
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES
Principal
Interest
Admin. Expenses
Total Expenditures
Net Revenues
Proceeds from bond sale
Transfers In
Told Olhx Soirees (Uses)
Begnwv Fund Salem*
Endrg Fund( w
8alenee
NJ
1994-95
Actual
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% increase/
-Decrease
1996-97
Proposed
$ Increase/
(Decrease)
Adopted
% Increase/
-Decrease
$16.020
S18.000
S18,000
IQ
0.0%
S22,000
S4.000
22.2%
$16,020
$18,000
08,000
$0
0.0%
$22,000
$4,000
22.2%
$50,000
$95,000
$95,000
$0
0.0%
$110,000
$15.000
15.8%
209,206
268,200
268,200
0
0.0%
234,770
(33,430
-12.5%
5_1Q
1.000
LM
Q
0.0%
LM
Q
0.0%
$259,716
$364,200
$364,200
$0
0.0%
$346.770
($18,430
-6.1%
($243,696
($346,200
($346,200
$0
($323,770
($18,430
$0
S251.310
$0
S363.200
$0
S363-200
$0
$251,310
$363,200
$363200
S344.770
$344,770
$256,153
S263.767
$263.767
S280.767
$263.767
S280.767
$280,767
S301,767
Page 12
0.14:1141MI A"
SCHEDULE OF PERSONNEL (1)
1994-95
Adopted
1994-95
Revised
1995-96
Adopted
1995-96
Revised
1996-97
Proposed
Increase
(Decrease)
FIND
Budget
8-09C
5-udget
Budget
Budget
Revised 96
QENERAL FUND
City Secretary/Mayor/Council
1.50
1.50
1.50
2.50
2.00
(0.50)
Human Resources
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
City Manager's Office
5.00
5.00
5.00
7.00
6.50
(0.50)
Economic Development
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
0.00
Support Services
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
Finance
5.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
0.00
Municipal Court
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
0.00
Teen Court
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
Fire Services
14.20
14.20
15.20
18.20
22.70
4.50
Police Services
23.00
23.00
27.00
27.00
36.00
9.00
Public Safety Support
15.00
15.00
18.00
18.00
17.00
(1.00)
Building Inspection
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
1.00
Streets/Drainage
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
14.00
(1.00)
Public Works Administration
4.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
8.50
3.00
Parks and Recreation
5.00
5.00
8.25
8.25.
11.25
3.00
Community Development
eQ
em
zM
QM
9M
Qm
Total Personnel General Fund
107.70
108.70
123.95
132.95
151.45
18.50
UTILITY FUND
Water Utilities
12.00
12.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
0.00
Wastewater Utilities
4M
4M
4M
4M
5M
1,00
Total Personnel Utility Fund
16.00
16.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
1.00
SPDC FUND
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.00
GRAND TOTAL PERSONNEL
124.70
125.70
143.70
152.70
172.20
19.50
Full Time
121.00
122.00
139.00
148.00
167.00
19.00
Part Time
31Q
IQ
42Q
4n
5M
QM
GRAND TOTAL PERSONNEL
124.70
125.70
143.70
152.70
172.20
19.50
(1) Part time positions listed as an equivalent percentage of a full time positio p:97persn2.wk4 08/29/96
I K �
Page 13
EXHIBIT "A"
LTMENT/Divqsion
GENERAL FUND
100-GENERAL GOVERNMENT
100-City Secretary/Mayor/
City Council
102-Human Resources
103-City Managers Office
105-Support Services
(4 :Fi
CE
ance
107-Municipal Court
108-Teen Court
130-PUBLIC SAFETY
131-Fire Services
SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS
FY 1996-97
ITEM
Two 4-drawer lateral files
5,588
0
0
5,588
Filing Fees
2,000
0
2,000
0
Printer'
LM
Q
Q
12M
TOTAL
8,887
0
2,000
6,887
Comprehensive Job Description Audit
10,000
0
10,000
0
Various In -House Training Programs
3.000
0
3,000
0
Affirmative Action Plan Software
5A00
Q
5.000
Q
TOTAL
18,000
0
18,000
0
t 7- Color Monitor for PIO-
700
0
0
700
Laser Color Printer for PIO-
4,000
0
0
4,000
Personal Computer for City Managet&
2,QQQ
Q
Q
2QQ
TOTAL
6,700
0
0
6,700
Telephone system -Public Works facility'
20,000
0
0
20,000
LCD display and presentation equip*
12,000
0
0
12,000
Network Server-Admin bldg-
5,000
0
.0
5,000
Network link/equipment-Admin bldg-
15,000
0
0
15,000
Public Works network equipment*
10,700
0
0
10,700
Parks network equipment-
16A50
Q
Q
16A50
TOTAL
79,150
0
0
79,150
Two computers for Payroll & Accounts Payable-
4,800
0
0
4,800
Laser jet printer for Finance Department*
2.=
Q
Q
2.854
TOTAL
7,750
0
0
7,750
Laptop Computer'
2.=
Q
Q
2"
TOTAL
2,800
0
0
2,800
One Part-time clerk
4,854
4,854
0
0
Special Projects
4,700
0
4,700
0
Office Furniture
j5Q
Q
Q
M
TOTAL
10,304
4,854
4,700
750
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus*
69,478
0
0
69,478
One Part -Time Intem
4,719
4,719
0
0
Three Firefighter/Paramedic (50% April 1 hire)
53,622
53,622
0
0
One Fire Inspector (50% April 1 hire)
17,874
17,874
0
0
Opticoms'
34,975
0
0
34,975
Vehicles-
78,010
0
0
78,010
Cameras'
18,000
0
0
18,000
Work Lights
9,200
0
0
9,200
Blood Pressure
4,500
0
0
4,500
911 Blood Pressure Oxygen Monitor
6,200
0
0
6,200
Automatic Defibrillator
5,000
0
0
5,000
Desk, Chair
5,200
0
0
5,200
Infra -red detector*
18,000
0
0
18,000
Public Safety House-
25,000
Q
Q
25.004
TOTAL
349,778
76,215
0
273,563
Page 14
EXHIBIT "A"
J
TOTAL
DEPARTMENT/Division ITEM AMOUNT PERSONNEL OPERATIONS CAPITAL
GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS
FY1996-97
130-PUBLIC SAFETY (continued)
132-Police Services
Four Police Officers (75%-Jan 1 hire)
123,509
123.509
0
0
Two Public Safety Officers (50% April 1 hire)
53,710
53,710
0
0
One Police Officer (50% April 1 hire)
19,223
19,223
0
0
Police Vehicles'
251,375
0
0
251,375
Replacement Body Armor (8)
4.000
0
4,000
0
Portable Radios for New Personnel (7)
8.400
0
0
8,400
Opticom Units (3) for Motorcycle units
5,000
0
0
5.000
Police bicycles (2) with accessories
2,528
0
0
2.528
Chairs (2) and desks (2) for offices
1,700
0
0
1,700
Chairs (12) for briefing -training room
700
0
0
700
Redmon physical training suits (2)
2,000
0
2,000
0
Stinger pursuit termination devices (3)
1,347
0
1,347
0
K-9 bite suit
1,535
0
1,535
0
Personal Data Terminals for Traffic and CID (2)'
12,000
0
0
12,000
NE Tarrant County Childrens Center
I=
Q
3.000
Q
TOTAL
490.027
196,442
11,882
281,703
133-Public Safety Support
One Relief Communication Specialist(75% Jan 1 hire)
20,316
20,316
0
0
Two Towers and Three Laptops'
12,000
0
0
12,000
16 Portable radios for Fire Service
34,192
0
0
34,192
Training Equipment -camcorder, projector, ect.
6,450
0
0
6,450
Land Acquisition for DPS Center and 2nd Station
Q
Q
Q
Q
TOTAL
72,958
20,316
0
52,642
140-PUBLIC WORKS
142-Building Inspections
One Building Inspector
30,853
30,853
0
0
One Truck'
23,500
0
0
23,500
Two Computers'
4,000
0
0
4,000
Office Furniture
1=
Q
Q
1.500
TOTAL
59.853
30,853
0
29,000
144-Streets and Drainage
One Street/Drainage Maint. Worker(50% April, l hire)
10,538
10,538
0
0
6-7 Yard Dump Truck'
40,000
0
0
40,000
20 Trailer'
7,500
0
0
7,500
Asphalt lay -down machine'
35,000
0
0
35,000
Paint Striping Machine'
4,000
0
0
4,000
Two truck mount and three hand held radios
12,300
0
0
12,300
Air Compressor 5 HP Vertical
1,700
0
1,700
0
Air Compressor SHP portable
700
0
700
0
Office Furniture
1,000
Q
Q
1.000
TOTAL
112,738
10,538
2,400
99,800
IC
Page 15
7,d-IR
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS
FY 1996.97
LIMENT/Divasion
TOTAL
ITS
AMOUNT PERSONNEL
OPERATIONS
CAPITAL
GENERAL FUND
140-PUBLIC WORKS (continued)
146-Public Works Admin.
4-Drawer File Cabinets
476
0
0
476
Chairs
1.200
0
0
1.200
Computers'
7,200
0
0
7.200
Conference Table
Soo
0
0
800
Drafting Chairs
400
0
0
400
Drafting Table
500
0
0
500
Flat File Cabinet
2.000
0
0
2,00
Laptop Computers'
6,000
0
0
6.000
PC Workstation
362
0
0
362
Printer*
1,600
0
0
1,600
Video Storage Cabinet
200
0
0
200
GPS Mapping System and Services'
6,000
0
0
6,000
Scanner*
16,000
0
0
16,000
Color Printer'
1,900
0
0
1.900
Disk Space*
1,600
0
0
1,600
Memory Upgrade Sun Work Station*
3,200
0
0
3,200
Memory Upgrade Plotter*
300
0
0
300
Portable 3 Mobile Radio
1,700
0
0
1,700
Automobile'
15,000
0
0
15,000
Engineering software
34,E
Q
Q
34.900
TOTAL
101.338
0
0
101,338
1 SoRECREATION
Parks and Recreation
One Recreation Specialist(50%April 1 hire)
12,134
11,734
400
0
One Administrative Secretary (50% April 1 hire)
16,533
13,633
0
2.900
Cash Register*
4,250
0
0
4.250
Computer Hub'
15,500
0
10,000
5,500
Fences Replaced
42,213
0
0
42,213
All Terrain Utility Vehicle
6,200
0
0
6.200
Computer-Admin. Asst.'
2,900
0
0
2,900
Shed -Hockey Equip.
1,100
0
0
1,100
Large Stage'
25,000
0
0
25,000
Van'
34,000
0
0
34,000
48" Walk Behind Mower
3,450
0
0
3,450
Field Rake*
8,311
0
0
8,311
Walk behind reel mower'
5,046
0
0
5,046
Full size 3/4 ton Pick Up*
20,000
0
0
20,000
Computer- MainL Shop*
2,900
0
0
2,900
62" Flail mower'
14,500
0
0
14,500
One Urban Forester (50% April 1 hire)
15,513
14,913
600
0
Large Tent
5,000
0
0
5,000
Video Camera
1,600
0
0
1,600
Slide Projector
1,500
0
0
1,500
Mowing
72,400
0
72,400
0
Library books
10-000
Q
0
10.000
TOTAL
320,050
40,280
83,400
196,370
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND
1,640,333
379,498
122,382
1,138,453
' items with asterisk are to be funded through a Personal Property Contractual Obligation with a 5 year maturity
A
�,Qao
Page 16
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF NEW REQUESTS
FY1996-97
TOTAL
DEPARTMENT/Division QEM
AMOUNTPERSONNEL
OPERATIONS
CAPITAL
UTILITY FUND
147-Water Utilities One Water Quality Control Specialist
24,369
24,369
0
0
3/4 Ton Truck
24.500
0
0
24,500
Backhoe Tractor
70,000
0
0
70,000
One Ton Utility Truck
32,700
0
0
32,700
Light Bar 3 Misc. Equip. for New Truck
3,000
0
0
3,000
Two Way Radios
5.400
0
0
5.400
Trench Shoring
17.000
0
0
17.000
Two Laptop Computers
6,500
0
0
6,500
Two Computers
4,800
0
0
4,800
Laser Printer
2,950
0
0
2,950
Light Tower
3.500
0
0
3,500
Side Boom Hoist
7,600
0
0
7.600
Portable Compressor
1,500
0
0
1,500
Office Equipment
10,820
0
0
10,820
Building Remodeling
39,850
0
0
39,850
Trash pump/saw/hammer
4,600
0
0
4,600
Power Washer
2.800
0
0
2,800
Meters
101,200
0
0
101,200
Meters -Auto Read Equipment
174.000
Q
• Q
174.000
TOTAL
537,089
24,369
0
512,720
148-Sewer Utilities One Utility Operator Lift Station Maintenance
24,270
24,169
101
0
One ton utility truck
32,700
0
0
32,700
SCADA system for nine lift stations
74,000
0
0
74,000
3/4 ton pickup truck
21,300
0
0
21,300
Two way radios
4,000
0
0
4,000
Field Equipment
7=
Q
Q
z=
TOTAL
163,270
24,169
101
139,000
GRAND TOTAL UTILITY FUND
700,359
48,538
101
651,720
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND-PARKS/RECREATION
350-SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
(Includes Park Dedication Fund and Park Special Revenue -Other)
Land -Bob Jones Park/Bicentennial Park
122,000
.0
0
122,000
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2,462,692
428.036
122.483
1,912.173
Page 17
EXHIBIT "A"
(W
ITEMS FUNDED THROUGH CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS
FY 1996-97
GENERAL FUND
100-GENERAL GOVERNMENT
100-City Secretary/Mayor/
City Council
Printer'
1,2S,Q
Q
Q
1.299
TOTAL
1,299
0
0
1,299
103-City Managers Office
17" Color Monitor for PIO'
700
0
0
700
Laser Color Printer for PIO'
4,000
0
0
4,000
Personal Computer for City Manager'
2000
Q
Q
2.49Q
TOTAL
6,700
0
0
6,700
105-Support Services
Telephone system -Public Works facility*
20,000
0
0
20,000
LCD display and presentation equip'
12,000
0
0
12,000
Network Server-Admin bldg'
5,000
0
0
5,000
Network link/equipment-Admin bldg'
15,000
0
0
15,000
Public Works network equipment'
10,700
0
0
10,700
Parks network equipment'
16-450
Q
Q
16-450
TOTAL
79,150
0
0
79,150
106-FINANCE
106-Finance
Two computers for Payroll & Accounts Payable'
4,800
0
0 .
4,800
Laser jet printer for Finance Department'
z oSn
Q
Q
z=
TOTAL
7,750
0
0
7,7W
`-Municipal Court
Laptop Computer'
2.M
Q
Q
2J=
L
TOTAL
2,800
0
0
2,800
130-PUBLIC SAFETY
131-Fire Services
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus'
69,478
0
0
69,478
Opticoms'
34,975
0
0
34,975
Vehicles'
78,010
0
0
78,010
Cameras'
18,000
0
0
18,000
Infra -red detector*
18,000
0
0
18,000
Public Safety House'
25-000
Q
Q
25,000
TOTAL
243,463
0
0
243.463
132-Police Services
Police Vehicles'
251,375
0
0
251,375
Personal Data Terminals for Traffic and CID (2)'
12-000
Q
Q
12,000
TOTAL
263,375
0
0
263,375
133-Public Safety Support
Two Towers and Three Laptops'
12-000
Q
Q
12-000
TOTAL
12,000
0
0
12,000
140-PUBLIC WORKS
142-Building Inspections
One Truck'
23,500
0
0
23,500
Two Computers'
A=
Q
Q
4=
TOTAL
27,500
0
0
27,5W
144-Streets and Drainage
6-7 Yard Dump Truck*
40,000
0
0
40,000
20 Trailer'
7,500
0
0
7,500
Asphalt lay -down machine*
35,000
0
0
35,000
Paint Striping Machine'
�QQQ
Q
Q
�QQQ
TOTAL
86,500
0
0
86,500
Page 18
70 aa.
EXHIBIT "A"
ITEMS FUNDED THROUGH CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS
FY1996-97
146-Public Works Admin. Computers'
7,200
0
0
7,200
Laptop Computers'
6,000
0
0
6,000
Printer*
1,600
0
0
1,600
GPS Mapping System and Services'
6,000
0
0
6.000
Scanner'
16,000
0
0
16.000
Color Printer"
1.900
0
0
1.900
Disk Space'
1.600
0
0
1,600
Memory Upgrade Sun Work Station*
3,200
0
0
3.200
Memory Upgrade Plotter'
300
0
0
300
Automobile"
15_000
Q
Q
15.000
TOTAL
58,800
0
0
58.800
145-PARKS AND RECREATION
145-Parks and Recreation Cash Register'
4,250
0
0
4.250
Computer Hub'
5,5W
0
0
5,500
Computer-Admin. Asst.'
2,900
0
0
2,900
Large Stage"
25,000
0
0
25,000
Van'
34,000
0
0
34,000
Field Rake*
8,311
0
0
8.311
Walk behind reel mower"
5,046
0
0
5,046
Full size 3/4 ton Pick Up*
20,000
0
0
20,000
Computer- Maint. Shop"
2,900
0
.0
2,900
62" Flail mower"
14.500
Q
Q
14.500
TOTAL
122,407
0
0
122,407
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND
911,744
0
0
911.744
Page 19
7--e-dy,Z)
RE
CITY OF SOLITHLAKE EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bondAM
AM 09:49
08/29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted FY95-96 FY96-97
Actual Budaet Revised Provosed
ALL FUNDS
Revenue
Interest Income
579,264
340,500
399,000
242,500
Fees
1,029,155
1,365,000
1,638,056
1,720, 000
Assessment Income
11,239
70,000
20,000
65,000
Developer Participation
36,649
0
85,000
0
Carroll ISD Participation
25,105
30,000
0
0
City of Keller Participation
0
0
0
0
Total Revenue
1,681,412
1,805,500
2,142,056
2.027,500
Expenditures
Water/Sewer Projects
1993 Water Bond Projects ($1.3 million)
157,091
0
0
0
Water Impact Fee Fund
256,199
279,800
496,079
500,000
Sewer Impact Fee Fund
692,231
400,000
916,833
1,085,482
Waterworks Improvements Fund
0
957,047
1,523,185
757,500
1995 Water Bond Projects ($2.5 million)
93,860
1,725,000
1,166,249
2,481,000
1997 Water/Sewer Bond Projects
0
0
0
5,040,000
er Assessment Fund
198,896
764,840
1,035,740
671. 0,000
otal-Water/Sewer Projects
1,398,277
4,126,687
5,138,086
11,533,982
Streets/Drainage Projects
1993 Street Bond Projects ($1.5 million)
509,580
0
28,147
0
1994 Street Bond Projects ($3 million)
336,709
1,853,357
703,823
1,154,910
Perimeter Road Fee Fund
70,393
0
0
0
Infrastructure Reserve Fund
1,780,259
1,967,850
2,227,059
575,000
1997 Infrastructure Reserve Fund
0
0
0
3,551,618
Street Impact Fee Fund
0
0
0
0
Drainage-Offsite Fund
0 .
0
0
0
Subtotal-Streets/Drainage Projects
2,696,941
3,821,207
959 0 9
5.281.528
Parks Projects
SPDC Revenue Bond Projects 452. 9,011 141,207 320A35 0
Total Expenditures 6,554,229 8,089,101 8.417,550 16.815.510
Net Revenue (4,872,817) (6,283,601) (6,275,494) (14,788,010)
Bond Proceeds
Transfers in
Transfer out
Total Other Sources (Uses)
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
5,693,820 1,843,000 2,797,380 11,522,000
958,436
1,081,840
2,105,393
0
410130
4(2 1,4691
90( 9,351)
11! 3,397)
6,242,126
2,683,371
3,993,422
11,408,603
7,727.258
9.096.567
9,096,567
5.496,337
9,096,567
6,814,495
6,814.495
3.435.088
1
Page 20
%1d"W,91
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
ActUal Budget
FUND 757-$1.3 MILLION-1993 WATER BOND PROJECTS
Revenue
Interest income 3,978
Developer Participation (Oakwood Estates) 0
Keller Participation -Beach Str 0
Total Revenue/Other Sources 3,978
Expenditures
EXHIBIT "A"
97b49AMk4
09:49 AM
0&29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Proposed
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Engineering contract
10,819
0
0
Water line-FM1709 west (Bal. of contract)
0
0
0
Water line-N. White Chapel (Oakwood)
0
0
0
Pearson Lane Pumps
0
0
0
12" High -Pressure
0
0
0
8" Peytonville (Copt-FM1709)12" Cont./TWKing
0
0
0
Shady Lane water line improvements
121,874
0
0
Beach Street Pumps/Upgrade-Keller pump station
24.398
0
0
Total Expenditures
157,091.
0
0
Net Revenue
(153,113)
0
0
Bond Proceeds (11/92)
0
0
0
Transfers In
0
0
6,048
Transfer Out
Q
Q
Q
Total Other Sources (Uses)
0
0
6,048
Beginning Fund Balance
147,065
(6,048)
(6,048)
Ending Fund Balance
(6,0481
(6.048)
Q
Proceeds of the $1.3 million certificates of obligation were used to construct identified water impact fee
eligible projects. Water impact fees are being used to pay debt service on this issue.
2
70 WJ^
Page 21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
.0
0
0
Q
0
0
Q
Ic
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
EXHIBIT "A"
FUND 751-WATER IMPACT FEE FUND
Revenue
Impact fee receipts
CISD participation -Shady Oaks 12" water line
Interest Income
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Impact fee update
Construction/Engineering-Kimball water line
Coventry line oversizing
N. Kimball 12" water main
S. White Chapel 12" water main
8" water line -Lonesome Dove to Emerald
12" water line in Johnson Road
12" water line Dove to Kirkwood
Village Center Phase I (17 water line)
Village Center Phase II (12" water line)
Engineering Water Ground storage #2 (balance)
Shady Oaks 12" water line (CISD)
Total Expenditures
Net Revenue
nd Proceeds
(4MOr"ansfers In
Transfers Out (1)
Total Other Sources (Uses)
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
Actual Budoet
97bond2.wM4
09:49 AM
08/29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Pr000sed
329,240
317,500
552,500
705,000
25,105
30,000
0
0
35.322
30.000
30.000
40.000
389,667
377,500
582,500
745.000
30,080
51000
18,000
0
17,358
0
0
0
37,537
0
0
0
0
125,800
101,672
0
0
149,000
166,543
0
0
0
79,564
0
0
0
0
190,000
0
0
0
200,000
0
0
58,300
0
0
0
72,000
0
0
0
0
110,000
171,224
0
0
0
256,199
279,800
496,079
500,000
133,468
97,700
86,421
245,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11( 4,755)
11( 6,676)
11L 6,6761
11( 3,3971
(114,755)
(116,676)
(116,676)
(113,397)
581,706
600-419
600,419
581,443
600,419
570,164
570,164
701,767
Water impact fees are collected from builders when a building permit is issued. These fees may be used
to construct'water lines identified in the water impact fee study, or to pay debt service on bonds
issued to construct the lines.
FY96-97 Budget
Receipts are based on 600 permits at an average $1,175.
12" water line in Johnson Road -Part of the transmission loop for the high pressure plane. This project will be
be done in conjunction with road improvements funded through 1997 Infrastructure Reserve Fund 502.
12" water line Dove to Kirkwood -To provide water to Solana.
Engineering Water Ground storage #2 (balance)-$60,000 budgeted in Fund 750; facility to be built at the
T. W. King location.
(1) Transfer to Utility Fund for debt service on 1993 series certificates of obligation issued for impact fee
eligible projects. These projects are fisted in Fund 757, $1.3M Water Bond Projects.
Page 22
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97b k4
09:49 49 AMAM
08/29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
FY95-96
FY96-97
Actual ud a
Revised
Proposed
FUND 752-SEWER IMPACT FEE
FUND
Revenue/Other Sources
Impact fee receipts
518,199 492,500
845,000
630,000
Interest Income
44,435 36,000
40.000
35,000
Developer contributions
0 0
0
0
Total Revenue/Other Sources
562,634 528,500
885,000
665,000
Expenditures
S-2 Sewer line (BearCreek/FM1709)
0
0
135,034
70,000
S2A Sewer line (FM 1 709/Florence)
73,569
400,000
417,500
0
N-3 Sewerline
21,880
0
185,089
0
S-7 Sewer Line (engineering/oversizing)
48,225
0
62,320
0
Coventry line oversizing
9,378
0
0
0
Emerald Est/Lonesome Dove
30,702
0
0
0
Bank Place Sewer
0
0
10,060
0
N-5 Sewer line
2,735
0
0
0
N-1 Sewer line
0
0
106,830
63,482
Gravity Main -Crossroads Square/LakeCrest
0
0
0
125,000
Dove Estates lift station/force main
0
0
0
170,000
Dove Road Sewer Force Main
0
0
0
657,000
N-4 Sewer line
505,742
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
692,231
400,000
916,833
1,085,482
Net Revenue
(129,597)
128,500
(31,833)
(420,482)
Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
0
Transfers In
0
0
0
0
Transfers Out
0
0
0
0
Total Other Sources (Uses)
0
0
0
0
Beginning Fund Balance
881,682
752,085
752,085
720,252
Ending Fund Balance 752.085 880,585 720,252
Sewer impact fees are collected from builders at the time a building permit is issued. The fees can be used
to construct sewer lines identified in the impact fee study or to pay debt service on bonds issued to
construct the sewer lines.
FY96-97 Budget
Receipts are based on 600 permits at an average $1,050.
S-2 Sewer line (BearCreek/FM1709)-Allocation to reimburse contributing developers Myers Meadows
and Albertson's shopping center for each connection to the sewer system in their developments.
N-1 Sewer line -Allocation to reimburse Coventry developers for installation of the N-1 line as the City
collects from builders in those developments.
Gravity Main -Crossroads Square/LakeCrest-sanitary sewer main construction will eliminate lift station at
at Crossroads Square.
Dove Estates lift station/force main -convert existing package treatment plant to City sanitary sewer.
Dove Road Sewer Force Main-15" sewer main from Carroll lift station to Whispering Dell, and force main
from the Dove Road lift station to the McGuire Thomas project This will redirect sewer flow from
the TRA Central Plant to the TRA Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
4
76-47
Page 23
Ic
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bond
(42w,
09:49 AM
0&29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95
Adopted
FY95-96
FY96-97
Actual
Budoet
Revised
Proposed
FUND 750-WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS FUND
Revenue/Other Sources
Developer Contributions
0
0
85,000
0
Interest Income
2,071
0
5.000
0
Total Revenue/Other Sources
2,071
0
90,000
0
Expenditures:
Marshall Creek Sewer Line participation
0
0
0
0
6" water main-Ridgecrest,Brian, Hilltop
0
103,200
0
103,200
Engineering -pump station #2 & storage tank
0
170,000
60,000
0
Water lines -Rolling Hills,Greenbough, Raintree, Brookwood (FY97)
0
228,247
0
230,000
Water line-W. Continental
0
25,000
20,700
0
8" water line -Lonesome Dove to Emerald
0
37,000
0
0
Land -ground storage#2/pumping, N. of MTP
0
80,000
140,231
0
Land -Public Works facility (FY96-down payment)
0
100,000
1,000,000
0
Land -overhead storage/FM1709
0
40,000
0
0
Land -ROW Sutton S-2A/CDBG
0
18,600
0
18,600
N. Davis Business Park -Sewer
0
0
177,359
0
Sewer extension -Quail Creek
0
0
7,898
0
Trail Creek Addition-Southlake/Coventry
0
0
4,355
0
Randol Mill sewer (with street)
0
0
66,044
0
Brock Drive 8" water line
0
0
38,128
0
Sewer line -Regal Oaks/CDBG
0
0
8,470
0
w site
0
0
0
160,000
Qextension-Miron
ter line North Peytonville
0
0
0
45,000
ater line Woodland Heights
0
0
0
30,000
N. Peytonville 6" sewer line extension
0
0
0
20,000
Continental Sewer main to Public Works facility
0
0
0
31,000
Village Center water/sewer improvements (balance)
0
0
0
119,700
Dove Estates -sewer collection system
0
155,000
0
0
Total Expenditures
0
957,047
1,523,185
757,500
Net Revenue
2,071.
(957,047)
(1,433,185)
(757,500)
Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
655,000
Transfers In
40,061
957,047
1,500,000
0
Transfers Out
0
Q,
(6,0481
0
Total Other Sources (Uses)
40,061
957,047
1,493,952
655,000
Beginning Fund Balance
(0)
42,132
42,132
102,899
Ending Fund Balance
42.132
42.132
102.899
The City Council authorized the transfer of funds from the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund to the
Waterworks Improvements Fund in FY95-96. Projects may be funded through an operating transfer
or through issuance of debt.
SEE THE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION OF FY96-97 PROJECTS
0
Page 24
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bond
09:49 AM
AM
b&29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
FY95-96 FY96-97
Actual Budaet
Revised Proposed
FUND 750-WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS FUND
FY96-97 Budoet
6" water main-Ridgecrest,Bhan, Hilltop -to improve water system in neighborhoods, initially budgeted in
FY95-96, will be done in conjunction with street projects.
Water lines -Rolling Hills, Green bough, Raintree,Brookwood (FY97)-to improve water system in neighborhoods,
initially budgeted in FY95-96, will be done in conjunction with street and sewer improvements.
Land -ROW Sutton S-2A-to acquire sewer line easements for CDBG grant project
Sewer extension-Miron site -to extend sewer from the Walmart site to the elevated water storage tank
at the Miron addition.
8" water line North Peytonville-to be the low pressure plane together
8" water line Woodland Heights -to provide a loop to the Woodland Heights Addition to improve pressure.
N. Peytonville 6" sewer line extension -extend sewer line from Myers Meadows northeastern boundary
along Peytonville.
Continental Sewer main to Public Works facility -to connect the Public Works facility to the S-7 sanitary
sewer main.
Village Center water/sewer improvements (balance) -improvements to serve the Village Center
0
7A6- 029
Page 25
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
Actual Budoet
FUND 758-1995 WATER BOND PROJECTS
Revenue
EXHIBIT "A"
97bond2mk4
b9:49 AM
08/29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Proposed
Interest Income
116,212
90,000
90,000
Total Revenue/Other Sources
116,212
90,000
90,000
Expenditures
Engineering
93,860
25,000
156,140
Land
0
200,000
1,010,109
Ground Storage Tank-5 million gallons
0
1,500,000
0
Total Expenditures
93,860
1,725,000
1,166,249
Net Revenue
22.352
(1,635,000)
(1,076,249)
Bond Proceeds (11/94)
2,532,450
0
0
Transfers In
0
0
0
Transfers Out
0
0
0
Total Other Sources (Uses)
2,532,450
0
0
Beginning Fund Balance
0
2,554,802
2,554,802
Ending Fund Balance
2,554.802
919-802
1.478.553
The City issued $2.5 million in certificates of obligation in November 1994 to purchase land and construct
a 5 million gallon water ground storage tank. In order to complete construction of the tank by summer
C997, additional debt is scheduled to be issued.
7
% -,;rO
55.000
55,000
10,000
0
2,471,000
2,481,000
(2,426,000)
950,000
0
0
950,000
1,478, 553
2.553
Page 26
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
Actual Budget
EXHIBIT "A"
97bond2.wM4
69:49 AM
06/29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Proposed
FUND -1997 WATER/SEWER BOND PROJECTS
Revenue
Interest Income 0 Q 0
Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 0
Expenditures
Ground Storage #2/Pump Station T.W. King 0 0 0
20" Transmission water line from Trophy Club 0 0 0
20" Transmission water line pump station/Dove elev. 0 0 0
12" water line in Continental and Kimball 0 0 0
1.5MG elevated storage FM1709/Miron (FY97-98) 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 0 0 0
Net Revenue 0 0 0
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0
Transfers In 0 0 0
Transfers Out Q Q Q
Total Other Sources (Uses) 0 0 0
Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0
Ending Fund Balance Q Q Q
Projects are identified in the Impact Fee study, therefore, the debt service on bonds issued for these projects
may be paid with collected impact fees.
FY96-97 Budget
Ground Storage #2/Pump Station T.W. King -to provide additional water supply via a 5 million gallon ground
storage facility. Construction of this facility will bring total ground storage capacity to 10 million gallons.
20" Transmission water line from Trophy Club -this line will enable the City to have a second water supply intake
point from the City of Fort Worth.
20" Transmission water line pump station/Dove elevated tank -to connect the pump station and storage tank to
the distribution system.
12" water line in Continental and Kimball -to reinforce fire flow for the eastern portion of the City. This
includes anticipated commercial development along FM1709 and in the Commerce/Bank Street area.
0
0
2,600,000
11300,000
650,000
490,000
0
5,040,000
5,040,000)
5,040,000
0
Q
5,040,000
0
Q
IR
8 Page 27
CITY OF SOLITHLAKE
EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
*09:49 AM09:49 AM
6&29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
FY95-96
FY96-97
Actual Bud -get
Revised
Proposed
FUND 755-SEWER ASSESSMENT
FUND
Revenue
Sewer Participation Fee
11,239 70,000
20,000
65,000
Interest Income
58,779 60.000
60.000
10.000
Total Revenue
70,018 130,000
80,000
75,000
Expenditures
Engineering'
128,475 35.000
185,000
180,000
Vista Trails
0 247,000
367,900
0
Cimarron Estates
0 48,500
48,500
0
Emerald Estates
70,421 142,340
142,340
0
Whispering Dell Estates
0 165,000
165,000
0
Highland Estates
0 127,000
127,000
0
Phase 2 sewer assessment program (1)
0 0
0
1,490,000
Total Expenditures
198,896 764,840
1,035,740
1,670,000
Net Revenue
(128,878) (634,840)
(955,740)
(1,595,000)
Bond Proceeds
1,317,050 0
0
1,325,000
Transfers In
0 0
0
0
Transfer Out
0 0
0
0
Total Other Sources (Uses)
1,317,050 0
0
1,325,000
Qdinning Fund Balance
39,759 1,227.931
1,227,931
272,191
ingFundBalance
1.227.931 593.091
272.191
2.191
(1) Phase 2 sewer assessment program = Huntwick, Diamond Circle, Mission Hills,
Rainforest/Shady Lane vicinity.
This program retrofits existing neighborhoods that have an inadequate septic system. The City collects a
a $1,300 sewer participation fee for each home connecting to the sewer line.
9
%-6 -z,-7z
Page 28
CITY OF SOLITHLAKE EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97b
AM
09:49 49 AM
08/29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95
Adopted
FY95-96
FY96-97
Actual
ud a
Revised
Proposed
FUND 703-1993 STREET BOND PROJECTS41.5
MILLION
Revenue
Interest income
20.067
4.500
4.500
4.500
Total Revenue
20,067
4.500
4,500
4,500
Expenditures
Engineering contract
5,276
0
0
0
Administrative expenses (bond issuance)
0
0
0
0
N. Carroll-Dove/Burney
(3,987)
0
0
0
N. Carroll-SH 1 14/Dove
211,231
0
1,925
0
N. Carroll-FM1709/Continental
0
0
0
0
S. White Chapel -Big Bear Creek/FM1709
193,161
0
26,222
0
S. Peytonville Road-FM1709/Continental Blvd.
103,899
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
509,580
0
28,147
0
Net Revenue
(489,513)
4,500
(23,647)
4,500
Bond Proceeds (11/92)
0
0
0
0
Transfers In
0
0
0
0
Transfers Out
0
0
0
0.
Total Other Sources (Uses)
0
0
0
0
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
582.321
92.808
92,808
97-308
92,808
69.161
69,161
73.661
The City issued $1.5 million in general obligation bonds
in November 1992 to
construct interim road sections
identified in the Road Bond Task Force plan.
Remaining funds to be used to construct projects identified in Fund 700, 1994 Street Bond
Projects
on the following page.
HQ
Page 29
%-,33
19
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
EXHIBIT "A"
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
Actual Budoet
FUND 700-1994 STREET BOND PROJECTS43 MILLIO
Revenue
Interest Income 170,321 77,000
Total Revenue 170,321 77.000
Expenditures
Engineering contract
W. Continental -White Chapel/Davis
E. Dove -White Chapel/Kimball
W. Dove-Creek/Peytonville (combined)
W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks
W. Highland -Shady Oaks/White Chapel (realignment)
N. Kimball-Highland/Dove (ROW only -intersection)
N. White Chapel-SH114/Dove
N. White Chapel-FM1709/SH114
S. White Chapel -Big Bear Creek/FM1709
Total Expenditures
Net Revenue
Bond Proceeds (11/93)
Transfers In
Transfers Out
+.al Other Sources (Uses)
%weginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
97bcnd2.wk4
09:49 AM
*29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Pro osed
100,000 50,000
100,000 50,000
60,361
0
75,000
75,000
0
555,750
0
555,750
0
859,000
569,518
0
0
28,607
0
0
0
142,100
0
222,680
0
121,900
0
301,480
0
25,000
25,000
0
0
121,000
0
0
276,348
0
34,305
0
0
0
0
Q
336,709.
1,853,357
703,823
1,154,910
(166,388)
(1,776,357)
(603,823)
(1,104,91.0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,998,492 2,832,104 2,832,104 2,228,281
2,832-104 1,055,747 2228-281 1,123-37�
The City issued the remaining $3.0 million general obligation bonds in November 1993 to construct interim
road sections for streets identified by the Road Bond Task Force.
FY96-97 Budget
W. Continental -White Chapel/Davis-construct interim road section
W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks -construct interim road section
W. Highland -Shady Oaks/White Chapel (realignment) -to realign the intersection
North Carroll from FM1709 to SH114, and South Carroll from Continental to FM1709 are on hold,
awaiting anticipated commercial development.
A
11
76
Page 30
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted FY95-96
Actual Budoet Revised
EXHIBIT "A"
97bond2.wM
09:49 AM
08/29/96
FY96-97
Proposed
FUND 502-PERIMETER ROAD FEE FUND
Revenue/Other Sources
Perimeter Road Fees
106,737
0
60,556
Interest income
6.432
3.000
6.500
Total Revenue/Other Sources
113,169
3,000
67,056
Expenditures
Culvert Improvements
14,998
0
0
E. Continental (Timarron/Dominion participation)
55,395
0
0
Total Expenditures
70,393
0
0
Net Revenue
42,776
3,000
67,056
Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
Transfers In
0
0
0
Transfers Out
0
(124,793)
1L92,020)
Total Other Sources (Uses)
O.
(124,793)
(192,020)
Beginning Fund Balance
82,188
124,964
124,964
Ending Fund Balance
124.964
3.171
Q
The City collects this fee from developers whose properties
border an identified perimeter road. The funds
can be used for reconstruction/repair of perimeter roads. Upon adoption of the Street impact
fees,
the perimeter road fee will no longer be collected.
Remainder of funds transferred to Fund 501, Infrastructure
Reserve, for construction of
Randol Mill-FM1709/Kingswood. With adoption of Street Impact Fee in 1996, perimeter road fees
are no longer collected.
12
;76
Page 31
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
,0
Q
P]
L7
It
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
FUND 501-INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND
Revenue/Other Sources
Developer Contributions
Interest Income
Total Revenue/Other Sources
Exoenditures
Kimball Road-FM1 709/SH1 14
Randol Mi!I-FM1709 to Kingswood
West Beach Land Acquisition
Culvert Improvements -Dominion
Summer Place drainage improvements
Post Oak Trails drainage improvements
Land acquisition (Municipal Facility) Richards/Timarron
Land planning -preliminary design (Municipal Facility)
Land acquisition (adjacent to Bob Jones Park)
Street improvements -Vista Trails(Neighborhood sewer)
Street rehabilitation-subgrade Timmaron/others
Brock
Hilltop/B dar/Hillside/Crescent/Woodland
Seal -Coat streets (portion of Cross Timbers addition)
Total Expenditures
Cnd
Revenue
Proceeds
Transfers In (2)
Transfers Out
Total Other Sources (Uses)
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
FY95-96
FY94-95
Adopted
Actual
Budget
36,649
0
2.380
1.500
39,029
1,500
533,852
11,290
1,163,375
9,808
61,934
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,780,259
0
319,770
0
0
0
0
850,000
0
0
440,000
0
58,080
250,000
50,000
1,967,850
EXHIBIT "A"
97bond2.wk4
09:49 AM
6W29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Proposed
0
30,000
30,000
0
425,715
0
0
124,122
10,804
791,000
125,000
275,718
313,100
0
111,600
0
50.000
2,227,059
0
20.000
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
325,000
0
250,000
0
575,000
(1,741,230)
(1,966,350)
(2,197,059)
(555,000)
868,000
1,843,000
2,797,380
0
918,375
124,793
557,345
0
0
0
(594,607)
0
1,786,375
1,967,793
2,760,118
0
0
45.145
45,145
46.588
45,145
608,204
608,204
53.204
Resources available via a transfer from the General Fund, or from the issuance of bonds, or from developer
contributions. The funds may be used for capital improvements, primarily for streets, drainage, and
to purchase land.
FY96-97 Budget
Street rehabilitation-subgrade Timmaron/others-to repair street section failures.
Hiltop/Briar/Hillside/Crescent/Woodland-street repair in conjunction with water line installation.
13
Page 32
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE EXHIBIT "A" -
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97b k4
09:49 49 AMAM
08/29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted FY95-96 FY96-97
Actual Budget Revised Proposed
FUND 502-1997 INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND
Revenue/Other Sources
Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0
Interest Income 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 0 0
Expenditures
Burney to Cul-de-sac
0
0
0
57,000
Burney -North Carroll to Lonesome Dove
0
0
0
129,400
Johnson Road
0
0
0
498,800
Love Henry Court
0
0
0
66,800
Lake Drive
0
0
0
93,000
Pine -Lilac
0
0
0
234,600
Diamond Estates subdivision street repair
0
0
0
800,000
Dove Road-SH114/White Chapel
0
0
0
150.000
Channel Improvements -Chapel Downs
0
0
0
146,250
Channel Improvements -Mission Hills
0.
0
0
97,500
Channel Improvements -Continental. Park Estates
0
0
0
292,500
Public Works facility -building improvementstfuel facility
0
0
0
232,850
City Hall facility -building improvements
0
0
0
78,118
Street rehabilitation-subgrade Timmaron/others
0
0
0
325,000
Seal -Coat streets -Cross Timbers, Lakewood, Woodland
0
0
0
103,100
Ridgecrest
Total Expenditures
0
0
0
0
0
0
246,700
3,551,618
Net Revenue
0
0
0
(3,551,618)
Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
3,552,000
Transfers In (2)
0
0
0
0
Transfers Out
0
0
0
0
Total Other Sources (Uses)
0
0
0
3,552,000
Beginning Fund Balance
0
0
0
0
Ending Fund Balance
Q
Q
Q$�
Resources available via a transfer from the General Fund, or from the issuance of bonds, or from developer
contributions. The funds may be used for capital improvements,
primarily for streets, drainage, and
to purchase land.
SEE THE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION OF FY96-97 PROJECTS
IC
14
Page 33
7,6-,37
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bondAM
(60" 09:49 AM
09l29/96
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted FY95-96 FY96-97
Actual Budget Revised Proposed
FUND 502-1997 INF ASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND
FY96-97 Budget
Burney to Cul-de-sac-contractor to reconstruct; 900 If @ $63/ft.
Burney -North Carroll to Lonesome Dove -contractor to reconstruct; 2,045 If @ $63/ft.
Johnson Road -contractor to reconstruct, in conjunction with 12" water line improvements; 5,280 If @ $94/ft.
Love Henry Court -contractor to reconstruct; 1,056 If @ $63/ft.
Lake Drive -contractor to reconstruct; 1,469 If @ $63/ft.
Pine -Lilac -contractor to reconstruct; Pine 2,112 If and Lilac 1,584 If @ $63/ft.
Diamond Estates subdivision street repair -contractor repair with concrete
Dove Road-SH114/White Chapel -contractor to reconstruct to serve MTP development, not included as part of
Road Bond Task Force plan.
Channel Improvements -Chapel Downs -pilot channel and side treatments; 750' @ $195/fL
Channel Improvements -Mission Hills -pilot channel and side treatments; 500' @ $195/ft.
Channel Improvements -Continental Park Estates-1,500' @ $195/ft.
Public Works facility -building improvements/fuel facility -to make improvements. to Public Works facility on
Continental Blvd.; includes funding to relocate fueling facility with above ground tanks initially,
budgeted in FY95-96.
City Hall facility -building improvements -renovations to public safety fire quarters and communications area.
Street rehabilitation-subgrade Timmaron/others-to repair street section failures.
Seat -Coat streets -Cross Timbers, Lakewood, Woodland-58,300 total square yards @ $1.75/sq yard;
Cross Timbers 38,300 sq yards, Wildwood 10,000 sq yards, Westwood 10,000 sq yards.
jecrest-contractor to reconstruct, in conjunction with water line improvements; 3,900 If @ $63/ft
15
Page 34
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
EXHIBIT "A"
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bondlwM
09*49 AAA
FY95-96
CO/am
FY94-95 Adopted
FY95-96
FY96-97
IMPACT FEE
Actual Budaet
FUND
Revised
Proposed
FUND 503-STREET
Revenue
Impact fee receipts
0 525,000
50,000
385.000
Interest Income
Q 6.000
1.000
11.000
Total Revenue
0 531.000
51,000
396,000
Total Expenditures
0 0
0
0
Net Revenue
0 531,000
51,000
396,000
Bond Proceeds
0 0
0
0
Transfers In
0 0
0
0
Transfer Out
Q Q
Q
Q
Total Other Sources (Uses)
0 0
0
0
Beginning Fund Balance
0. 0
0
51,000
Ending Fund Balance
Q . 531000
51,000
"7"000
The streetimpactfeewd be collected from
developers atthetime of buildingpermit Thefundswlnot becodected
on lots in developments that paid a perimeter road fee. The street impactfesswill be used to payforimprovements
identified in the street impact fee studywithin
designated service areas. Thefees may also be used to payfordebt
service on bonds issued for street improvements in the impact fee study.
16
7A6- 39
Page 35
E
F
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
EXHIBIT "A"
L
FY95-96
FY94-95 Adopted
Actual Bud -get
97bond2.wk4
09:49 wu
olu29/96
FY95-96 FY96-97
Revised Proposed
_FUND 500-D AINAGE-OFFSITE
Revenue
Drainage Fees 74,979 30,000 130,000
Interest Income 4.457 2.500 7.000
Total Revenue 79,436 32,500 137,000
Total Expenditures 0 0 0
Net Revenue 79,436 32,500 137,000
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0
Transfers In 0 0 0
Transfer Out 0 Q 0
Total Other Sources (Uses) 0 0 0
Beginning Fund Balance 39,736 119,172 119,172
Ending Fund Balance 119,172 151.672 256.172
The City collects from developers an offsite drainage fee that is based on the Citys critical drainage study plan.
These fees will be used to construct drainage facilities, either separately or as part of a street improvement.
Upon implementation of the Street impact fee, the City will no longer collect the offsite drainage fee, since
drainage improvements are incorporated as part of the street reconstruction cost
Ienues collected from developers for specific critical drainage structures are identified as such on subsidiary
punting records.
17
%16- 34"o
0
7.000
7,000
0
7,000
0
0
0
0
256,172
261172
Page 36
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
EXHIBIT "A"
CAPITAL PROJECTS
1996-97 PROPOSED BUDGET
97bond2.wk4
•. 08:49 MA
FY95-96
. oen9�9e
�
FY94-95 Adopted
FY95-96 FY96-97
Actual Budoet
Revised Pr000sed
FUND 302-SPDC REVENUE BOND PROJECTS
Revenue/Other Sources
Interest income
114.810 30.000
25.000 10.000
Total Revenue/Other Sources
114,810 30,000
25,000 10,000
Expenditures
Joint Use Improvements -Gymnasium
719,730 44,207
50,000 0
Bicentennial Park -Phase 1
1.739,281 97,000
270,435 0
Land Acquisition
Q Q
Q Q
Total Expenditures
2,459.011 141,207
320,435 0
Net Revenue
(2,344,201) (111,207)
(295,435) 10,000
Bond Proceeds
976,320 0
0 0
Transfers In
0 0
42,000 0
Transfers Out (down payment-W. Beach)
(295,3751 Q
Q Q
Total Other Sources (Uses)
680.945 0
42,000 0
Beginning Fund Balance
2,374,309 711,053
711.053 457,018
Ending Fund Balance
711.053 599,846
457.618 467.618
Proceeds from the sales tax revenue bonds are used to construct SPDC and Council approved park projects.
18
Page 37
�j
City of Southlake, Texas
August 29, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of .Finance
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 664, 2nd reading, Tax Levy Ordinance
The FY1996-97 budget as submitted to the City Council proposes a tax rate of $.422 per $100 of
a property's taxable value. Part of the tax rate, $.17238 per $100, pays for the retirement of debt
that is due during the 1996-97 budget year. The remainder of the tax rate, $.24962 per $100, is
used to support General Fund operations of the City, such as police, fire, and inspections. State
law requires the City to adopt the tax rate in these two components.
On July 25, the Tarrant Appraisal District certified to City management the appraised values of
all properties in Southlake. Total taxable value in the City is $1,281,650,132, which is the value
of properties as of January 1, 1996. Upon adoption of a tax rate ordinance on second reading,
the City's tax collector, Tarrant County, will be notified of the adopted rate. Tarrant County will
then apply the tax rate to the taxable values of properties in Southlake, and generate tax statements
after October 1.
Ordinance No. 664 as presented will adopt the $.422 tax rate, with the rates established for the
debt service and operations components. The ordinance was approved on first reading at the
August 20 Council meeting. Please place the tax rate levy ordinance on the September 3 agenda
for second reading.
LAH
4
ORDINANCE NO. 664
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FIXING AND LEVYING MUNICIPAL
AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1, 1996 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND
FOR EACH YEAR THEREAFTER UNTIL OTHERWISE
..................
PROVIDED, AT THE RATE OF S0 PER ONE HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($100.00) ASSESSED VALUE ON ALL TAXABLE
PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS., AS OF JANUARY 1, 1996, TO
PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT
EXPENSES AND TO PROVIDE AN INTEREST AND SINKING
FUND ON ALL OUTSTANDING DEBTS OF THE CITY;
DIRECTING THE ASSESSMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR
DUE AND DELINQUENT DATES TOGETHER WITH
PENALTIES AND INTEREST THEREON; PROVIDING FOR
PLACE OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE
TAX ROLLS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as
the "City") hereby finds that the tax for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996, and ending
September 30, 1997, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City and the general
improvements of the City and its property must be levied to provide the revenue requirements of
the budget for the ensuing year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved, by a separate ordinance adopted on the 3rd
day of September, 1996, the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996, and ending
September 30, 1997; and
WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements concerning the levying and
assessing of ad valorem taxes have been complied with.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1 That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are
incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety.
Section 2 That there is hereby levied and ordered to be assessed and collected for the
fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996, and ending September 30, 1997, and for each fiscal year
thereafter until it be otherwise provided by and ordained on all taxable property, real, personal
and mixed, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas, and not exempt
7e-oi
Ordinance No. 664
Page 2
from taxation by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, an ad valorem tax rate of
................
$0 422 for the general operations of the City on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed
value of taxable property, and shall be apportioned and distributed as follows:
a. For the purpose of defraying the current expenses of the municipal government of
.......................
the City, a tax of $t}2492 on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value
of all taxable property.
b. For the purpose of creating a sinking fund to pay the interest and principal on all
........................
outstanding debt of the City, not otherwise provided for, a tax of $0 17-238 on each
one Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of all taxable property, within the
City which shall be applied to the payment of such interest and maturities of all
outstanding debt.
Section 3. That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on December 31,
1996, and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 1997.
There shall be no discount for payment of taxes prior to said January 31, 1997. A delinquent tax
shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by State law Section 33.01 of the Property .Tax
Code, to -wit: a penalty of six percent (6%) of the amount of the tax for the first calendar month
it is delinquent plus one percent (1 %) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax
remains unpaid prior to July 1st of the year in which it becomes delinquent.
Provided, however, a tax delinquent by July 1st incurs a total penalty of twelve percent
(12 %) of the amount of the delinquent tax without regard to the number of months the tax has
been delinquent. A delinquent tax shall also accrue interest at a rate of one percent (1 %) for each
month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain delinquent on July 1,
1997, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of taxes, penalty and
interest due; such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to contract with the City's
attorney pursuant to Section 6.30 of the Property Tax Code.
Section 4. Taxes are payable at the office of Tarrant County Tax Collector. The City shall
have available all rights and remedies provided by law for the enforcement of the collection of
taxes levied under this ordinance.
Section 5. That the tax rolls, as presented to the City Council, together with any
supplement thereto, be, and the same are hereby approved.
Section 6. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or
provisions inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby expressly
repealed and rescinded to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict.
Section 7. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this
Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional
by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such
remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall
7e- 3
..
A
A
Ordinance No. 664
Page 3
remain in full force and effect.
Section 8. That the necessity of and levying municipal ad valorem taxes of the City for the
next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas, requires that this Ordinance shall
take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of
1996.
ATTEST:
Sandra LeGrand
City Secretary
PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this
1996.
ATTEST:
Sandra LeGrand
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date:
Adopted:
Effective:
H:\WP-FQ.ES\ORD-RES.ACR\664-7AX.ORD/kb
7e-zl
Rick Stacy, Mayor
day of ,
Rick Stacy, Mayor
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-91 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-210, Second Reading
Rezoning and Concept Plan - Retail Center
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for a Retail Center, being approximately
1.822 acres situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and
being legally described as Lot 5R4 of Parker's Corner Addition, Tract
2A4 of the Jesse G. Allen No. 18 Addition, and approximately 27,892
square feet of abandoned F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.) right-of-way.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of F.M. 1709 (W. Southlake Blvd.) And F.M. 1938
(Davis Blvd.).
OWNER: DKV Partners I and Southlake Joint Venture
kPPLICANT: John R. Drews
CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District (Lot 5R4), "C-3" General
Commercial District (Tract 2A4), and abandoned Right -of -Way of F.M.
1938 (Davis Blvd.).
REQUESTED ZONING: "C-2"Local Retail Commercial District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include residential and office buildings, hotels, and
commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs)
CORRIDOR Retail Commercial (same as in 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and B-1 districts)
RECOMMENDATION:
NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response was received outside of the 200' area:
• June and Wayne Haney, 400 Brock, Southlake, TX., undecided,
"Traffic crossing 1938 (Davis) from Southlake Market Place to
reach Wendy's. Trash in drainage ditch that ends up in the creek
and on our property."
P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table to the continued August 15,
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 1
dated August 2, 1996, amended as follows:
1) Amend #5 (Provide a 20' Type `O' Bufferyard along
the north property line) changing the required
bufferyard to a 10' Type `O' Bufferyard
2) Delete #6 A-F (Required driveway spacing and throat
depth along F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938)
3) Change the driveway intersecting the west line of
F.M. 1938 from Lot 5R4R2 to a "right in/right out/
left in" driveway.
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (6-1) subject to Staff Review Summary No.
1 dated August 2, 1996, amending Item #5 (20' to 10' with the number of
plants per 20% deleting #6A-F, changing drive on F.M. 1938 as P & Z
recommended and right in only on northeast drive on F.M. 1938 and
accepting 2' bufferyard on west line of Lot 5R4R1
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 1 dated August 2, 1996.
(WL :\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-091ZC. WPD
�D-2-
R 3F5 3F1B ._. 2
3F9
3F1N E
1C 302
SF1K lE1
------------ ._i._ -1F1 SFI JCl 981 I if
- YIEj i I i 1
N 2F1 _ - i- - SF1 SFIL ; i 9cl �1 tE
3J1 � � ': 3E1
R - SF6 SFIA 'J IB2 60 Ac
' - -- - - 3F2 3F1C 311
x _ y 10 YfF 1 Sc Io3 10
Yll
4A 4H 461 - -}- 7C 7 7B 7A ••�. 6 60 BA28 �•
7B II p�M IIII
MI YJOHN J. FRS ® R M 7-s m -�O` 2 19
4J SLQ4EY A-Ml �' LAc
2 481 _ - 19 Ac 6 Ac 9.5Ae 1 - , �'�
B ~� 4 Ac
6 6 BA20 Bp• tlCdOli -
-1— A s
7 W4 4C2 I 9.64 Ac 1-
A
2 7A, — } — e B — '+
IB 18 1CI 1c 1 IE 2CS 2C7 2C1 - l I
t 2C2 2C3 2C9 2C3 i 1 j 1 i i •-7-'
{� 182 OI 2 2
181A P Me! i CE 68 t' 1�_ .„DAIS ��-_ ut
,Yfv _ I 1
WA
Nt 181 _._. 6-3 Ac '�..�- 12.8 Ac '.. "`_._. a _•T•-- ��"_-,!
I6 181E SCHOOL 1 �` i i B a 2 2B , �� 20 Ac
1H IE -- �`- , _ �yJ �� ca 2D 1
181C I _ �� f i 2ETE
I m
�sT-- �•
1BIA i~ f to
3 Ac
ES
7F P IQ
i— 2n `Z 2A5
20 Ac ---_ - 204 2CI5 IDi
2F3 t •v 4 2AI
z t 2C27 2C26
WEST 1Al 6 ?'. WA 4 �j
-- 4A 4 4A14A 4 /a p� 5A A L1 _ _ 2A4 -
5 6A 6 MIA 4E01 fl
4 1 A LE ----- � (IrIID 2B
1 A -IQ
m 4 Ml Q i scl � 1C
112 Ac 10,5 Ac
M12 4FII L
4A kl AI & _
4E 4KI 58 .
10 Ac 4N +� {a ¢ SA1 � 1 L_ _ A IA4
&4 Ac 15.2 k 11. A
' 6C2 4K CA lr�� 1S4 At i
Y 51• N �f 3 tic 4 2A2 IA28 s Ac 2 !
E
NE4�I�G�nIA�
6c i►�" 6A 6AI 68 6M 6 6E A-150
6
48 4C 40 I V ' 2A2
4A16 6 Ac Ac 5 At 7 i i ;' i i i 18 D�' _ J'
6B2 9.65 Ac
4A18 9.85 Ac 9.55 Ac 19.7 Ac 6AIA ,
681A1 MIS 4AIS 4A 4A9 11 Ac fic I
F 3&17 Ac 6C3 182 ; j I 2A3
1 R
4AIS 3 � '
1 O 6A2 6E1 Ar�5F1 - 6F1R 6F2 IBI IBIS ,81A
7.86 Ac
G B 6E S AB 3.6 Ac 6.1 Ac 2 Ac
J a _
4E 4A SC1 >F 3 KaLfR CITY LIMIT 2 u `- 5A _ N48 AY
wo
4 �✓ A�N 11.27 Ac •.11y1T P
4C x 3A BY r�I�-S 5 5B
x L.A. CLAY BN���H _
5 /- l A 581 A
A- - i
44 Ac 80 Ac
M TE ......_._..�..
Eg(A aANU A H. 4b 301
- , 8/]t SURIfY A-I501
TRACT MAPJ. HIOR
A—
F767 I f/95 SUBDIVISIONS. ii.O"F. ADJUSPMENTS
NAG„
IC Forester
w g-5
.,s x i
T3
I I 1P�P
J. Martin
♦
♦ ' 5.5°
�y��♦ Taco Bell
BSI
t T TR 2A4A
. a 1.01 �c 722 a
Cn
?� 1 R
5
TR 201
2►. G
2F i U BT \, � t C
.CJ2 @ „ C2n t C
-
t
Metzer Diaries t
' 10A TH . 2A 1 ----. t
2.64 AC t
1A t
068! Q \
Ni/2
S1/2 a
2 j<G• ARV Y it
a
CC
-
- — en
x P�
U
0 C0
03
3 10
8 O ADJACENT OWNERS
A AND ZONING
Spin Representative #15
a 68 Wayne and June Haney
gnus Partners if I
TR 2A l: Ar.
1.236 AC
•f�
.n
TR '
IF TR 1 ..
103
AC ,<
TR 1C1 §Y
.138 0
TR;'1C
4.862 AC
City of Southlake, Texas
No: ZA 96-91 Review No: One Date of Review: 8/0 A6
i 1
'i•7iTZ-F04 E, M, S!11314ir,
MUM I 1•
I IL
ir: ► i
ARCHITECT:
i
� - • I okk, a] V m— M K�
:1
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/15/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. Delete "Site Plan" from the plan title.
2. Show the platted lots across Davis Boulevard. Label the zoning and land use designation (L.U.D.) For
properties across Southlake Boulevard and Davis Boulevard.
Show all building setback lines. The required setback lines are as follows:
Lot 5R4R1
North 50' BL, East 15' BL, South 10' BL, West 15' BL.
Lot5R4R2
North 50' BL, East 50' BL, South 10' BL, West 15' BL.
4. Relocate the proposed structure shown on Lot 5R4R2 behind the -15' west building setback line.
5. Clearly show all bufferyards with dashed lines and crosshatch or shading. Label the t= and width
of required bufferyard. Provide the following bufferyards:
Lot 5R4R1
North Property Line - 20' Type O Bufferyard (P & Z ACTION.•8/1 S/96 allow
Bufferyard, CC. ACTION. • 8120196 allow 10' Type `O' Bufferyard)
East Property Line - 5' Type A Bufferyard
South Property Line - 5' Type A Bufferyard
West Property Line - 5' Type A Bufferyard (C.C. ACTION: 8120196 allow
Bufferyard)
']p-5
10' Type 'O'
2' Type 'A'
City of Southlake, Texas
Lot5R4R2
North Property Line - 20' Type O Bufferyard (P & Z AMON.•8115196 allow 10' Type 'O'
Bufferyard, C.C. ACTION: 8120196 allow 10' Type `O' Bufferyard)
East Property Line - 15' Type S Bufferyard
South Property Line - 5' Type A Bufferyard
West Property Line - 5' Type A Bufferyard
6 The following changes are needed with regard to driveways and compliance with the Driveway
Ordinance No. 634:
A. Provide the distance to the nearest driveway centerline intersecting the south line of Southlake
Boulevard west of the proposed westerly driveway. The minimum spacing required between
full access driveway centerlines along Southlake Boulevard is 500'. Limited access driveways
(right in/right out only) maybe spaced a minimum of 250' from any other driveway centerline.
(P & ZACTION.•8/15/96 delete, CC ACTION. 8120196 delete)
B. Provide the distance to the nearest driveway centerline intersecting the west line of Davis
Boulevard south of the proposed southerly driveway. The minimum spacing required between
full access driveway centerlines along Davis Boulevard is 500'. Limited access driveways
(right in/right out only) may be spaced a minimum of 250' from any other driveway centerline.
(P & ZACTION.•8115196 delete, C.C. ACTION.• 8120196 delete)
C. The most easterly driveway intersecting Southlake Boulevard does not meet the minimum
centerline spacing requirement of 500' from the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Davis
Boulevard. The spacing provided is approximately 230'.(C.C. ACTION. • 8120196 change to
right in only)
D. The centerline spacing between the full access and limited access driveways intersecting
Southlake Boulevard do not meet the minimum spacing requirement of 2501. T1ie spacing
provided is approximately 200'.(P & Z ACTION.•8115196 delete, C.C. ACTION. • 8120196
delete)
E. The driveway intersecting Davis Boulevard does -not meet the minimum centerline spacing
requirement of 500' from the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. The
spacing provided is approximately 230'. (P & Z ACTION.•8115196 change to right inlright
out/teft in driveway, C.C. ACTION: 8120196 change to right Wright out4eft in driveway)
F. The minimum required driveway throat depth for traffic -stacking is 50'. The provided throat
depth for each driveway is approximately 281. (P & ZACTION.8115196 delete, C. C. ACTION:
8120196 delete)
* Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-91" in the lower
right corner for ease of reference.
`70-11
City of Southlake, Texas
* Building articulation requirements will not be reviewed at the Concept Plan level. This issue will be
addressed upon review of the Site Plans. Please note that all buildings must meet the architectural
standards of the Corridor Overlay Zone Regulations as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance 480, Section
43.9.c.1.
Although no review of required parking or interior landscape is provided at the Concept Plan level,
staff strongly recommends that the lot be evaluated for compliance with the off-street parking
requirements per Ord. 480, Section 35, and the interior landscape area requirements per the Landscape
Ordinance No. 544 prior to preparation of any site plans. The applicant should be a-,'
rare that all areas
intended_ for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance and all fire lanes must be per the City Fire Department.
* . A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,
must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be
limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,
and related Permit Fees.
* The applicant should be aware that any new submittals, if required for the next scheduled meeting,
must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/9/96 . All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9"
and an 11 "x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
P & Z ACTION: August 8, .1996; Approved (7-0) to table to the continued August 15, Planning &
Zoning Commission meeting.
August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 1 dated August
2, 1996, amending #5 (Provide a 20' Type `O' Bufferyard along the north property
line) changing the required bufferyard to a 10' Type `O' Bufferyard, deleting #6 A-F
(Required driveway spacing and throat depth along F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938), change
the driveway intersecting the west line of F.M. 1938 from Lot 5R4R2 to a "right
in/right out/ left in" driveway.
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (6-1) subject to Staff Review Summary No. 1 dated
August. 2, 1996, amending Item #5 (20' to 10' with the number of plants per 20%
deleting #6A-F, changing drive on F.M. 1938 as P & Z recommended and right in only
on northeast drive on F.M. 1938 and accepting 2' bufferyard on west line of Lot
5R4R1
Denotes Informational Comment
�c: , Southlake JV & DKV Partners I, LP
T.L. Callaway Architects, Inc.
LAWRFILEMEV\96\96-091 CPA
-71 )"7
[�J
S
I�
v
M
c
„p
r
1
en
map
on
isaf
to
1V
1.
c
ee
� p
eel
R
RR
ci
PIP
a
!!
5
!
C
Tz
Mf
,
!
MErE, CENTER
SWCDAVDHW0.Q�x149gt
�,
i
3OUTHLA13LTEAS
^
—7 CHI
I
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-210
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
APPROXIMATELY 1.822 ACRES SITUATED IN THE JESSE G.
ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, BEING LOT 5R4 OF
PARKER' S CORNER ADDITION, TRACT 2A4 OF THE JES SE G.
ALLEN NO. 18 ADDITION, AND APPROXIMATELY 27,892
SQUARE FEET OF ABANDONED F.M. 1938 RIGHT-OF-WAY,
AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" FROM "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
AND ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL;
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A 'SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes,'and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-3" General
Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, and abandoned right-of-way under
the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 1 % & q
(W
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS, the CityCouncil of the City of Southlake Texas does find that there
ty ere is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed; are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 2 1 [) -10
of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,.as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
Being approximately 1.822 acres land situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract
No.18, being Lot 5R4 of Parker's Corner Addition, Tract 2A4 of the Jesse G. Allen
No. 18 Addition, and approximately 27,892 square feet of abandoned F.M. 1938
right-of-way, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein, from "C-3" General Commercial District, "C-2" Local
Retail Commercial District and abandoned right-of-way to "C-2" Local Retail
District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit "B".
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. 1That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
g
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most .
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances. are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described -herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 3 -7b �''
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996.
IUVE;1' S)
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 4 -7b-1 1
A
A
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFF
ECTIVE:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 5 ', n • 13
EMBIT "A"
BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE COMMON PROPERTY
CORNER OF THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5113. SAID PARKER'S
CORNER ADDITION AND THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5114.
LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF F. M. HIGHWAY No.
1709 (SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD. A 130 FOOT WIDE RIGHT—OF—WAY), -
THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHEAST RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF SOUTHLAKE
BOULEVARD AS FOLLOWSe
N 51'26'34'E. 348.28 FEET TO A TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
MONUMENT FOUND,
S 64.04'04'E. 76.40 FEET TO A P.K. NAIL SET IN A BROKEN
TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT MONUMENT IN THE WEST RIGHT—OF—
WAY LINE OF F.M. HIGHWAY No. 1938 (DAVIS BOULEVARD. A
VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT—OF—WAY),
THENCE ALONG THE SAID WEST RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD
AS FOLLOWS,
S 00.15'29'E. 61.77 FEET TO A TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY
DEPARTMENT MONUMENT FOUND,
N 05.24'57W. 100.31 FEET TO A P.K. NAIL SET IN BROKEN
TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT MONUMENT,
S 00.16'02'E. 99.87 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD SET,
S 05.55'38'E, 64.46 FEET TO TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY
DEPARTMENT MONUMENT FOUND IN THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF
AFORESAID SOUTHLAKf- JOINT VENTURE TRACT BEING THE NORTH
BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO
OTTIS F. COLLINS ACCORDING TO THE DEED RECORDED IN VOLU1�
8267, PAGE 1572 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY.
TEXAS, f
THENCE S 89'56'09'W. 83.74 FEET.ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY LINE
BETWEEN SAID SOUT14LAKE JOINT VENTURE TRACT TO A 1/2 INCH
IRON ROD SET IN THE AFORESAID EAST RIGHT—OF—WAY OF
ABANDONED DAVIS BOULEVARD,
THENCE N 11'54'42'W. 67.28 FEET ALONG THE SAID EAST RIGHT—OF—
WAY LINE OF ABANDONED DAVIS BOULEVARD TO A 1/2 INCH IRON
ROD SET IN THE NORTHWEST LINE OF AN 80 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 9614. PAGE 1733 OF THE DEED
RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS,
THENCE S 51'26'34'W. 141.24 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND
FOR THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE CORNER OF THE MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF SAID LOT 5113 AND THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF
SAID LOT 5114,
THENCE N 38'33'26'W. 210.03 FEET ALONG SAID COMMON PROPERTY
LINE OF LOT 5113 AND LOT 5114 TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1.622 ACRES (79.380 SQUARE FEET) OF LAND.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-210.C-2
Page 6
EXHIBIT "B"
®
a asp a all
asp
PAF'�gll
F
LIF,
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES
Page 7
a
b
f'
e:i
REli i18Q .8ij`a!1 [i 8�1 .
818p 8� pet}�j �!'atT�t ill
tatx pr1 i8gt p1g$ �es
i�'9tCe;�s)<s,�-
a � �
I fig
IV sI
\480-210.C-2
'
. RETAIL CENTER
S.W.C. DAVIS BLVD.OPK 1"8) A
SOUTHLMM BLVD MK 1709)
SOUTHLAE$TEXAS
r:F
riF�Q)
t�
Lr .�
110-In
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO:
ZA 6 _ 8 PROJECT: Site Plan -Parker's Corner Addition
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743 -
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for property described as being approximately .7232 acres situated
in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, and being legally described as
Lot 5R4 of Parker's Corner Addition, a portion of Tract 2A4, Tract 2A4 of
the Jesse G. Allen No. 18 Addition, and approximately 27.892 square feet of
abandoned F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.).
LOCATION: South side of corner of F.M. 1709, 375' west of F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938.
OWNER: Southlake Joint Venture
APPLICANT: Wendy's International
CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail
centers that serve local and regional needs)
CORRIDOR
RECOMMENDATION:
NO. NOTICES SENT:
Retail Commercial (same as
Six (6)
0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and B-1 districts)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response was received outside of the 200' notific4tion area:
• June and Wayne Haney, 400 Brock, Southlake, TX, undecided,
"Traffic crossing Davis from Southlake Market Place to reach
Wendy's. More trash in drainage ditch that ends up in the creek and
then onto our property."
P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table to the continued August 15, 1996
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 1 dated
August 2, 1996, amended as follows:
1) Amend #2A (Provide a 20' Type `O' Bufferyard along the
north property line) changing the required bufferyard to a 10'
Type `O' Bufferyard.
x
2) Double the plantings required for the 5' Type `A' Bufferyard
along the south property line.
3) Delete #3 (Widen the 4' walk along F.M. 1709 to a 6' walk in
conformance with the Trail Master Plan)
4) Delete #4B, #4C, #41), #4E (Required driveway spacing and
throat depth along F.M. 1709)
5) Delete # 12(Provide required building articulation) approved
as shown.
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table until the September 3, 1996 City
Council Meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996.
L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-088SP. WPD
'1Ez i
I.
6A
1 rjfjs�r
idopi
J. WALKER
SUPWY A-IM4
%
6AI
IAIAI
h
'wry
Afift
6
912
------
IAIA
JA
—i
687A 6BIA
W
6 6AI
5
i B6
WA AIA Al 1AIA2A
2
682
2D 2E
4
1AIA2F
684
1AIA2G
68
6c 689
1AIA3
CJ
3FID
3F3 3m 3D 38 zz J"c
9 9A2
3F5
9AIA
I
%
D I'
yy 3FI8 3GI 1 2 3
9A
I
9A
sn
YIK 302
98
s
3FI
L 3A 3G
981
IEI
OR
. 3El
3FIA 3H
YIG 31, 9ct
YIF
I YIN
ID
60 At
7B
4A 4m Am
X 3c . . .
1113 ID
3
7 78 A 6 GE 8A2B
a
7
4AI
JOHN J. FRE 0-
20
78 k
AA19
AV104
Ac 3.3
6 Ac 9.5'Ac
I
I
m
7
>
4G
r—
c ADD'
7AI
— I i
9.64 Ac 843
XT
8 B
o
10 le
6
ROAD
2CI 2XCI 20
J
ISIA P
i 1
2 2
c
f
IN
FWFJNM
.3 Ac
SCHDOL
I28 Ac
"
4
tAl
N
INA
felc
2A3
20 Ac
181A
2D
2E
2A2
j.---
EA E3
Ix
2F
M
UT NG
Ac
2FI
204 2CI mi
2FJ
k
2C27 2C26 A 2AI! V
2AI
44AT
4 2AI
502A
2A
2A6
00
m
4AIA
LE
rx
"I
Q
4
CO
4Al2 41fl
L
5cl 10
ID
Ic
2B
4E
1 0 Ac Q
4KI 40
5
I
Ac
Ac
14.5 Ac
4F
V 4L &4 Ac 5AI
58
5Q
15.4 Ac
I A
IA,4
I
IA3
2A2
IA
IA20
2 r-.Fl
4"
4B
6AI sa
6 6E
4C
THONALS
5 Ac
40
6 Ac Ac 5 A- 7
O
A -I=
s"
Y
945 k Ift Ac
2A2
ALI? 4
4#0
19,7 Ac 6AIA 6C4 60
40
11 Ac
1
9.65 Ac
6C
kc
6A2
6E1 6Fik
60
- - GF2
182
i i i i
2A3
&I Ac
If- 3 3.6 Ac
1
OF
181
2 Ac
isle
ISIA
7.86 Ac 13,
TRACT MAP 2 2A
IA
VY
041
'A..,
-IC Forester
/ 108
. O.12 @
10A
'A
681 Q
•-- —"�
N112
S1/2
cc
0
— — Y
8A
U
0
cc
36�
m
5
J
._. -j
..: w 7
:Y
I
I
(J. Martin40
I
i
I
TR CO TR 2A4A
.lit •88 c �
1
3R2
-1.692 ®
, 5.5:
_ * �+ L
U l�l'
ZR 1
_722 0
S 1.01 pC
I p,
iv 07
CD W
2 C O
- 2.560 0
CD
w
1R
-0- j., 6� t ct' u�
`•'3 'TR
\ / '2A
n��n t .46 3A 11A TR 2A1 A
S f 1 C t ® .46 45 3.63 AC
Metzer Diaries t TR 2A5A
TH.i�A1 __ t
2.64 AC y_ , TR 2A5 k
TR 2A5B
1 R
2AB
v
TR 2A I 234 O �C
C TR
�L ' 2A '
c R T12'
. A .`:`•,
t
j RV Y TR 2A :r 1AC j
4 5 i 1.236 AC
4 A,1 ,
A�F�� ___ _- �. tut ,— -�-- ,n ---
pER , ,o IF TR :.:.
CORN, TR AC 1.797.'i
t TR 10 AC=..'.
ADJACENT OW s
Arc
ND ZONING TR ,C1
.133 0 ► .
Spin Representative #15
Wayne and June Haney I 4.8621 C
City of Southlake, Texas
"Case No.: ZA 9b-8g T Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/30/96
Project Name: Site Plan - Wendy's. Lot 5R4R1, Parker's Corner 0 7232 acres situated in the Jesse G.
Allen Survey. Abstract No.18
OWNER:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON =6/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.CITY
1. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards:
A. Provide a 20' Type O Bufferyard along the north property line adjacent to Southlake
Boulevard with the required plantings. Please note that where parking is located between the
setback line and the R.O.W. shrubs reaching a mature height of 3' or greater must be planted
at 30" on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. (P & Z
ACTION.•8115196 allow, 10' T pe 'O' Buffer)arc)
B. Provide a 5' Type A Bufferyard along the west line adjacent to Lot 5R3 with the required
plantings. The required plantings are 2 Canopy Trees, 4 Accent Trees and 17. Shrubs. Please
note that the 10' Type pe B Bufferyard shown to be located along the west line of Lot 5R3 is the
bufferyard for that site.
C. Remove the parking areas from the north and west required bufferyards. Parking areas cannot
be located within the bufferyards.
2. Widen the 4' walk shown along Southlake Boulevard to 6' in conformance with the Trail System
Master Plan. (P & ZACTION.•8115196 delete)
3. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways and compliance with the Driveway
Ordinance No. 634:
A. Provide driveways in conformance with the approved Concept Plan for this site.
B. Provide the distance to the nearest driveway centerline intersecting the south line of Southlake
Boulevard west of the proposed westerly driveway. The minimum spacing required between
full access driveway centerlines along Southlake Boulevard is 500'. Limited aces driveways
(right in/right out only) may be spaced a minimum of 250' from any other driveway centerline.
(P & ZACTION.•8115196 delete)
City of Southlake, Texas
C. The most easterly driveway intersecting Southlake Boulevard does not meet the minimum
centerline spacing requirement of 500' from the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Davis
Boulevard. The spacing provided is approximately 230'.(P & ZACTION.•8115196 delete)
D. The centerline spacing between the two full access driveways intersecting Southlake
Boulevard (easterly driveway shown as right in/right out only on the Concept Plan) do not
meet the minimum spacing requirement of 500'. The spacing provided is approximately 165.
(P & Z ACTION.•8/1 S/96 delete)
E. Based on the firlly developed site, the minimum required driveway throat depth for traffic
stacking is 501. The provided throat depth for each driveway is approximately 28'.
(P & ZACTION.•8/15196 delete)
4. All mechanical units including, including the electric transformer pad located at the rear of the
building, must be fully screened of view from F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938.
5. Horizontal and vertical articulation is required on the north, south, east, and west building facades
meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c. Compliance with the articulation
requirements are as shown in the attached Articulation Evaluation Chart. Please note that scaled
dimensions were used in the evaluation.
.,
City of Southlake, Texas
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
Prior to construction of any signs.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709.
The applicant should be aware that any new submittals, if mQuired for the next scheduled meeting,
must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/9/96 . All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9"
and an 1111x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table to the continued August 15, 1996
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 1 dated
August 2, 1996, amended as follows: Amend #2A (Provide a 20' Type `O'
Bufferyard along the north property line) changing the required bufferyard to
a IV Type `O' Bufferyard, double the plantings required for the 5' Type `A'
Bufferyard along the south property line, delete #3 (Widen the 4' walk along
F.M. 1709 to a 6' walk in conformance with the Trail Master Plan), delete #4B,
#4C, #4D, #4E (Required driveway spacing and throat depth along F.M. 1709),
delete #12(Provide required building articulation) approved as shown.
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table until the September 3, 1996 City
Council Meeting.
` Denotes Informational Comment
att: Articulation Evaluation Chart
cc: Southlake JV & DKV Partners I, LP
JBM Engineers & Planners
Wendy's International, Inc., 4545 Fuller Drive Suite 404, Irving, TX. 75038
Ph. (214) 791-0070, Fax (214) 541-0179 Attn: Tim West
LAWP- USP.2
Articulation Evaluation No. 2
Case No. ZA 96-88
Date of Evaluation: 8/30196
Elevations for Wendy% Lot SR4111 Parker's Caner Received
8fM6
of -teeing:
North Wall ht. =
17
Horizontalluticulation
Vertical articulation
Max. wall length
Required Provided
51
Delta
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Mo. artic. offset
38
3 18
25%
500010
Yes
Yes
51 41
3
20•/.
Yes
hPm artic. length
10 3
70%
No
6
10 4
100%
60%
Yes
No
It. Side -facing:
Please note that the overall width of the building -is approximately 45' which does not exceed the max allowed wall length of 51'
West Wall ht. =
15
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Max wail length
Required Provided
45 36
Delta
209A
Okay?
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
INm. artic. offset
2 4
100%
Yes
Yes
45 44
2 2
2%
00/0
Yes
Yes
Min. artic. length
9 12
33%
Yes
11 12
90/0
Yes
L Side -facing
East Wall ht: =
15
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Max wall length
Required Provided
45 24
Delta
470A
Okay?
Yes
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Min. artic. offiet
2 4
100%
Yes
45 57
2 2
27%
0`/o
No
Yes
Mm artic. length
3 5
67%
Yes
14 15
71/o
Yes
Rear - facing:
South Wall ht. =
15
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Max. wall length
Required Provided
45 20
Delta
56%
Okay?
Yes
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Min. ate• offset
2 5
150%
Yes
45 41
2 4
9%
100'/o
Yes
Yes
Min. mac• length
5 4
20%
No
10 4
60%
No
Please note that the overall width of the building is approximately 45' which is the max allowed wall length
$.
14
as
xx
Rd i
9
to
rn
C"
eo
CT
co 31
Q
A-,
CE
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA - 7 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-209, Second Reading
Rezoning Request / A.A. Freeman Survey,
Abstract No. 522, Tract 2A1
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for approximately 1.61 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman
Survey, Abstract No. 522, Tract 2A1 and being the proposed Lot 2, A.A.
Freeman No. 522 Addition.
LOCATION: 585 North Peytonville Avenue, southeast of the intersection of Ten Bar
Trail and North Peytonville Avenue.
OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Mark and Karen Goodwin
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include residential and limited low
intensity office and/or retail uses)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty (20)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response within the 200' notification area:
• Kenneth Vanderford, 1337 Ten Bar Trail, Southlake,TX,, in favor.
"Make it happen! This is the third letter. Get on with it and stop
wasting tax dollars on registered letters!" *•
P& Z ACTION: August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) rezoning request
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0), First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-209
STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-W Single Family
Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff.
L:\WP-FELES\UEMO\96CASES\96-087Z.WPD
2A
T i_ 1TT
IAIAI
2CICI
18 +ACI 15 Ac
�. �I ---fY
ID 3E
IA2 1 I
w
WA 1AIA'--A—may ll•'J�y
r l 2A3 2D Ac v' -� �GN — •�.
U2 RD 1 9cN40
N
y
OW. EA LDS 3A � + 1 Y J A
SLMEY A-120 1 Y
IAS �
i r
ut
3A1 6 Ac
3A •�� !
A6 � .• I � i
3D
6Ac \
G ID — 1
Z° 1
IC 2
122 Ac 145 Ac 3 1y 1
1 �D. U HO
1A4 4 ' y�16 IMP:
1A AR 5 Ac !
2 ! , i�T` .
S Ac
TH nIQCL _ s
� n-nat
2 '
TRACT MAP
a6s A< i, 9
I
1"! i T� -
i 2A3 , IA t f u
i7.86 Ac
' ml
w
26 Ac f
--
m�M1.11
aj
i
L_._.
5}�W
U ®
•1
swwy A-
1\
11C
5.53 Ac IleBA
6
I
6 ,I
A
11E
A
6
A
I '
4
l '
BA3
8A2
I1C2 11C2A
IIC2
Il
BAI
I i j
Ari
E
11F
11D
�g
A
i
35 Ac
¢¢�
i i i i i
1
10.
3A
UA 3H MA
381
Me
' 302 3B4
J 341 p�j0 3e3 j
WEST 1HtAKE BLVD
20 2E AAI
- i U
T
MEADOW GLEN
I
� I
12
21_' _ N a "' "C 1
I / „ S-F-1 -A . I X 61 Ac
�s ez I `
/ 4
I�
67 Iz0
3 GLEN COVE �{ocd /✓ �� \ 6' 7s
' vande d'
y, a .
73
6
.o
E. Mincheu--
N (
Josten
q / \
S
Gaoes ti ^ /
T -2 e-A,- "SF20A,�
n a 52 Ac , .
SF3070
�e
P , 71
J. Wilson et,
J. Sullivan J. Ozielawa 6t
w R. Kiel
y
S. Brennan �_ „ 59
iR ro 40 58 `� 6 fn& 6 0 63
`� � C. Chapman r 60
t\; 1, m
��
30 W ��500 6,
- �.cE,�/ PECOS
7 a� c. moore
G� -� s� —.s
= 56 "SF20Aw 28 29
�7 N zr
?J y zto -
42
A 2655
32 ADJACENT OWNERS
I x
AND ZONING
\ 31 �\ Spin Representative #13
Jim W. Goggin
- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-209
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING _
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
APPROXIMATELY 1.61 ACRES SITUATED IN THE A.A.
FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 522, TRACT 2A1 AND
MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
"A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF -IA"
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
REQUESTED ZONING:
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City kas the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural
District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-209.SF1
Page 1 -7r' q
(400,
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract of tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September,1989, as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
LACTYD0CS\0RD\CASES\4W209.SF1
Page 2 -7 F _ K
Being a 1.61 acre tract of land situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No.
522, Tract 2A1, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF -IA" Single
Family Residential District.
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-209.SF1 1
Page 3 9 F 4
A
A
until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10). plays before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 st reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR ,,
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-209.SF1 1
Page 4 1 F_.. 7
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-209.SFI
Page 5
�7��g
..
A
EXHIBIT "A"
Commence at a 1/2 inch iron found at the Southeast corner of
the above referenced tract, said point being, by deed call, 303
varas East and 1203 varas South, of the Northwest corner of
said Freeman Survey, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 19
seconds West, 0.6 feet to a point in an existing fence, for the
Southeast corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described
tract;
Thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 19 seconds West; along the
North line of Southridge Lakes Phase III, Section One as shown
on a Plat of record in Cabinet "A", Slide 782,.Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, 164.39 feet to a point in*same and from
which said point a 1/2 inch iron at the original Southwest
corner of the above referenced tract bears South 25 degrees 20
minutes 24 seconds East .14 feet;
Thence North 25 degrees 20 minutes 24 seconds West 259.11 feet
to a 1/2 inch iron found in the apparent South R.O.W. line of
Peytonville Avenue;
Thence North 65 degrees 03 minutes 49 seconds East 310.46 feet
along said line to a point at the Northeast corner of the above
referenced tract and from which said point the center of a 6
inch metal post bears North 23 degrees 50 minutes West 0.47
feet;
Thence Southerly with an existing fence line to and along the
Westerly line of Southridge Lakes Phase IV, Section One, as
shown on a Plat of record in Cabinet"A", Slide 1031, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, the following:
South 01 degree 14 minutes 26 seconds West 85.92 to a
capped iron found,
South 00 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds West 60.12 feet to 40•
a capped iron found,
South 00 degrees 57 minutes 47 seconds West, 145.14 feet
to a capped iron found and South 00 degrees 59 minutes 06
seconds West 73.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
containing 1.61 acres, more or less.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-209.SF1
Page 6
Q 1
�� 1
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-103 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Brazos Electric Power Corp Substation
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for the Brazos Electric Power Cooperative Substation
legally described as Lot 3, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No. 1 and being
approximately 3.921 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No.
1958.
LOCATION: East T.W. King Road, approximately 1700' North of the intersection of
Kirkwood Drive and East of T.W. King Road.
OWNER: Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
APPLICANT: PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P.
CURRENT ZONING: "C-3, CS, PUD" General Commercial District, Community Service District,
Planned Unit Development District.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office
and/or retail uses) and Mixed Use (may include residential and office
buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5)
RESPONSES: Two (2) written response was received within the 200' notification area:
• Richard H. Kuhlman, 9 Village Circle, Suite 500, Westlake, TX 76262,
in favor. "I have seen these installations done about twenty different
ways in the DFW area. This method is by far the least obtrusive. Please
approve the site plan as revised."
• Mike B. Sartain, Brazos Electric Power, P.O. Box 2585, in favor.
"Brazos Electric owns the site that is the subject of this actioft. We are
in favor of the project as it will use existing facilities and will not
hamper our use of the site."
P & Z ACTION: August 22, 1996; Approved (6-1) subject to Staff Review Summary No. 1
dated August 16, 1996, amended as follows:
Delete Comments No. 5 (bufferyards), 6 (interior landscape), 8 (all weather
paving surfaces for areas of vehicular use), 14 (parking spaces), 16 (site
grading plan), with the staff and applicant meeting with the City Fire
Marshal with regard to Comment No. 9 (fire lanes). P & Z accepting the
commitment of the applicant to work with Brazos Electric Coop. and
MTP/IBM with regard to improving the landscaping of the site.
STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Staff Review Summary No.
1 dated August 16, 1996 with the exception of the items stipulated in the
attached Staff Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996.
%- 1 1
12
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
cc
_._._
%
YROA_ ES
Zs 22 rRi EIS D. P 1 11 10
9AP1£1' —!! 48
BOB HONES ROAD
TRACT MAP � 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
e
U
21 19 I8
20
H
_1-
-1-' i i
2 1 2 1A
ii
EDLI
W. HILLS
A-15M AMr1Ey A-177B .. .. ... ..
i!!!!
'°yy�UB 3 I1i11� 11111
m
111 11�1J,� jj
UA/v%
F i USA
4
2 /
' p @
HENRY
���
1A MILLSIp
I Wfn"" A-7411 A-fm I = :4
lAI I -
611 Ac MEDLIN 2A
10 _ ^ I 1A Jp / IA1 A— —_2A7 2 I,�1,1. I
Al , 1
1—
A3 27 Ac
NO 4.6 At
4 , ARK �joN "
-- K� w1 No �s 1 I,,808 09�
oly 1JA D((jON
0 AO i� ,al
5 !� 24U.P MARTIN � 4A
3A
S(AtLEI' Arms J
C.M. THROOP
—
4A % 'F• 4 1C 1
21.36 Ac
!
�
7 7A3 �� 7A1 1"I I !
�• 24.76 Ac i.•
i 85 7AlA 7A 7A2 IA1
rl �.
83.47/Ac ,! 18 Al I 5AIAIBIa B,A CIA SiA41EY A—JI.T4
r- 1
`�-^._ _ -. '!—••'+ 7A►E1BI6
N IB2 S1A1A—Ir�A j 4AcA.
�• �•
..� ,. 7.14 Ac
r•-- M1 1 482 18I •,�1� 6422 Ac
35.19 Ac '� -
i - 20.017 k 7 ^ ,1
A 1 r - � ATE IJ-71 A<
3
,e.n 77A10 18 '�
ADJACENT OWNERS
AND ZONING
1
TR 4
3.61 AC
i
„AG" 1
1
� tAC
TR 4
.83 AC
B •-
CS/C-3'PUD'ol 2 Texas Utilities 2-149
AC I
1
2�5
"AG"
TR.1A
8.65 Ac
lffl\ ' V -- — ---
%3 1 MEpt-�N A.Oien
vv vE TR 2
MTP—IBM A.
95$ 3.15 AC
,. _„
"AG"
"C-S/C-3 PU D" • • - - - - - - -
{i:` MTP—IBM A
LNG a
P 4 075 AC
to
55
Z°i
v '
' IB
1
B
20.152
1
TR 1
, oc
. X
A
TR tAi
Spin Representative #2 I
Martin Schelling
I '
PAR -1G-31
City of Southlake, Texas
No.: ZA 96-103 - Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/30/96
Project Name: Site Plan - PCS Primeco Wireless Communication Site Lot 3, Block A, MTP-IBM
Addition No. 1
OWNER:
,-Brazos Electric Power Cooperative Inc
P.O. Box 2585
Waco. Texas 76702-2585
Phone:
Fax .
CONSULTANT:
eoeraubc Resource Management. Inc.
P.O. Box 850281
Richardson. Texas 75085-0281
Phone: (214) 669-9272
Fax : (214) 669-9294
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/26/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
The following changes are needed with regard to areas intended for vehicular use and point(s) of
ingress/egress to the site:
A. Show the location and dimension the width and depth of all point(s) of ingress/egress to the
site. The City of Southlake Fire Marshall has indicated that a driveway, meeting the
construction requirements of the City Fire Department and applicable City Ordinances should
be provided from T.W. King to the front gate of the site with "Knox Boxes" being installed,
per Fire Department requirements, to allow adequate emergency access into the site. The Fire
Marshall has also indicated that no fire lanes shall be required within the fenced area of the
site.
B. Show all areas intended for vehicular use and label the type of surface material. All areas for
vehicular use must be of an dust free "all weather surface" material. The crushed rock material
specified in Note No. 8 on this plan does not meet the "dust free" requirement of the Zoning
Ordinance. Note No. 3 shown on this plan contradicts by stating that "site surfacing shall
conform to City Ordinances and requirements." (P & Z ACTION 8122196. delete) 4,
C. Provide a minimum of 3 - 9' x 18' parking spaces. (P & ZACTION8122196. delete)
2. Provide the following Site Data Summary Chart to include the following items:
A. The percentage of site coverage shown appears incorrect. Site coverage is the percentage of
lot area encumbered by structures only. The percentage of site coverage under the "CS"
Zoning District Development Regulations cannot exceed 50%. This site does not appear to
have 86% site coverage.
B. Correct the required parking to indicate 3 spaces. (P & Z ACTION 8122196. delete)
! G- 7
City of Southlake, Texas
3. Show the proposed finished grade of the site, with contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot
elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb
returns, building comers, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and
label all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show
centerline of water courses and existing drainage easements. The applicant has indicated in Note No.
10 on the plan that no changes are to be made to the finished grade of the site. (P & Z ACTION
8122196. delete)
* This review is based on the "CS" Zoning District Development Regulations.
Staff has determined, based on additional information provided in this site plan, that comments No.
5 and No. 6 in Staff Review Summary No. 1 dated August 16, 1996, regarding bufferyard and interior
landscape requirements, do not apply to this site. The new structure on this site does not exceed 30%
of the existing structure(s) or 5000 square feet which is the criteria determining that all landscape and
bufferyard requirements be met.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required
fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter
Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
The applicant should be aware that any new submittals which may be required for the next scheduled
meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/09/96. If not received by that time, no review
will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6"
x 9" and an 11 "x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
P & ZACTION: August 22, 1996; Approved (6-1) subject. to Staff Review Summary No. 1 dated August
16, 1996 amended as follows:
Delete Comments No. 5 (bufferyards), 6 (interior landscape), 8 (all weather paving
surfaces for areas of vehicular use), 14 (parking spaces), 16 (site grading plan).with the
staff and applicant meeting with the City Fire Marshall with regard to Comment No. 9
(fire lanes). P & Z accepting the commitment of the applicant to work with Brazos
Electric Coop. and MTP/IBM with regard to improving the landscaping of the site.
Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
Geographic Resource Management, Inc.
Master Plan, Attn.: William Cothrum, Fax: (214) 748-7114, Phone (214) 761-9197
.2
A
009
m
r . •r �cY • y. � (LpppJ)
e€ Up I
ll
---------. at E��•�•�a a���Ag �� _ --__-
p Y � gill
A
VA
3
Bf{D 1.1WOYl A !lp
i
i
'#t
»
i
�v
c
i
l �
i
_
M.r
Ivu iam AIMM341 RaWK - vm
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-107 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Christian Men's Network
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Christian Men's Network on property legally
described as Lot 2R1, Block B, Ravenaux Village, and being
approximately 3.36 acres situated in the Thomas Hood Survey, Abstract
No. 706.
LOCATION: South side of Ravenaux Drive approximately 500' west of the
intersection of Ravenaux Drive and North White Chapel Blvd.
OWNERIAPPLICANT: Christian Men's Network.
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1 " Detailed Site Plan District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include residential and office buildings, hotels, and
commercial and retail centers)
�J. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response was received within the 200' notification area:
• William and Zena Lee Rucker, 650 S. Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
TX, opposed. "I am particularly opposed if they don't pay taxes."
P & Z ACTION: August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996
Note that this revised plan reduces the size of the building in Lase I
from approximately 13,000 s.f., two-story structure to a 7,650 s.f.,
single -story structure. The proposed Phase I will be office use only.
Note also that there is now parking in the front of the building due to
the relocation of the building's entrance from the northeast corner to the
front facade. These changes have necessitated the new elevations which
are attached to the plan.
L:\WP-FHXS\MEMOW6CASES\96-107SP. WPD
5.19Ac
��----- le 11.33 Ac I x
Ups
IA2 tic rC WA.&645 Ac R
i i IBFLA,
r„ S9 A<
J.
IIlY A V
i 2 I 201 Ac 2A2 &M At
i IAI
i TRACT MAP
2A1 —•— I
2A3 �� -% _ _ IA3 ` A63ALON H. C
1 t IC 20 � ♦ 3A4 j1 61AN6Y A-tCO
-- —� ♦ 3A 3A1 C-^++�1 WWIOOLO Ac
zc GRUMP `" 2 0 6A 3 s d RKIN H. CHIVERS
9AREY A-JW
1 is � A 56.33 Ac
69
S J
3AZA
un
X I i 4> N 382 39 381 X56 Ac
115 Ac
1 Y 6D 11 I ST 5.27 Ac I ,�1
�A� N� 40 6� �2 , L
}A 2A A— an 6f tC 60 EC SO I P ]E19 ]E 3EiC 2S{06 Ac
Sr 1
26 Ac A St- Ac 9 A 6.{3 Ac 4 Ac
INE
3016
TH® 2 1 AD Di i !
AWAY A-W
MST S1IiEET 1 ,..,� j
Jd bl
&W Ac Ile 1 d111 6At6 6A 6A6AP ® 6 884 El . I IF 1e2 to 4
HE A A.( A 2 663 1'� l� i
i 6 1
6 A 6e2A 3 Ll 5 A. i
A f! �^
BA15 681C ; 'f�- i
6A1 A A'S ;,Ifs4 k
It 6At 9 eele I I
11F 96 10 1 I I
4Mk
Ito
;5Y ill11 i
�! + " HALL �JON W.W. HAI
35 A< xmr A-ims
1 A
I i
1W
I I it IIA2 2� ilk �. .�7
1 i i I I ylT l�I,HCJ' #10
3A
3EIA A-,W
3ele
Vr 384
3e3
aAll� aio
I �
19
T !
Pot m I
m
t ' ( IF 50
nr-
L)
Sp < —
cc
CC ol
r\j 0a)
u c mi OU
<
fn
0) cr N
cx (D jL
�IIHM
LL �i F. ,
m
.0 co 2 co 0 Z, cr) C>
3L
cr
cr
to 7CPo
SO
co
C\j v L'Ill I
crOf
LLi CIO
CL
el
sit
Co)
Co -C
cc
m L)
M <
v m V 7 -- - Q _- N
(D cn
:c
C CO
:3
L)
co
ca to
to
091
w
co
0
C.)
CO
90 LU
31
W
Ci
oL �
NZ
Q�CLU UR I
CL
Q
cn~ 'Mir
(v J�� ;
LL
Z
�O
N
sfm 1xvvunos
auaa xnvn&va
� N
t �
XHOAU3N
GeMV1 NyI.LsMHO
a
1
�1�r
iiiLU
Q
�
�gttt t
U
if
.
i
INN
t
�t
� � � � � �ay•
�:» �
����� �
�
�e
.Aaaa:asai
a y
y
to
APPROVED SITE PLAN
\
1
N
J -
i W ,
LL '
H
IRON 1a■
quill
tll illWi Y
difili
4RRR■
City of Southlake, Texas
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ASE NO: ZA96-107- REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 8/30/96
PROJECT NAME: Revised Site Plan for the Christian Men's Network being Lot 2R-1 Block B
Ravenaux Village and being 3.97 Acres
OWNER/APPLICANT:
istian Men's Network
1001 W. Euless Blvd Suite 104
Euless. Texas 76040
PHONE: (817) 283-2898
FAX:
ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITE,CT:
ArrchTech. Ltd.
2935 Everest Lane North
Plymouth. Minnesota 55447
PHONE: (612) 4764133
FAX: (612) 476-9317
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8 2/96 AND WE OFFER THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
It should be noted that this proposed use shall comply with the development regulations set forth in
the "CS" district, except as otherwise noted.
Move the proposed extension of Ravenaux Drive farther west to ensure appropriate access to Lot 2R2,
Block B, Ravenaux Village. Consult with Staff regarding the geometry of the new cul-de-sac and
right-of-way. Construction of this extension should be completed prior to issuance of the certificate
of occupancy for the Phase I building.
2. Show the location of any intended exterior auditory devices or provide a note stating that none will
be utilized.
3. Provide the benchmark used for the topographical information shown.
4. Provide a summary chart showing all proposed variances to the "CS" zoning district in which the
proposed use(s) would be allowed. This should show the referenced zoning district, the existing
requirements and the proposed variance.
I.
5. Based on the required bufferyards, revise the Bufferyard Chart to reflect the following:
A. South bufferyard: Increase the canopy trees from eight (8) to ten (10); increase the shrubs from
twenty-four (24) to thirty-eight (38).
B. West bufferyard: Increase the shrubs from thirty (30) to thirty-two (32).
All fire lanes and curb radii dimensions must be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to construction.
All construction must be in compliance with the Masonry Ordinance No. 557 which requires eighty
percent (80%) masonry material or glass on all exterior facades.
9H`Q
City of Southlake, Texas
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, building plans must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the
01 following fees: -Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related
Permit Fees.
* No review of the landscaping is intended with this Site Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting
the requirements of Ordinance No. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
* A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit for any future phases, a
revised site plan must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
* Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-107" in the
lower right corner for ease of reference.
* The applicant should be aware that any new submittals that may be required for the next scheduled
meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/9/96. If not received by that time, no review
will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6"
x 9" and an 11 "x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
* Denotes Informational Comment
c: Christian Men's Network
ArchTech, Ltd.
Integrity Development, Att: Jim Halek, 14869 Manitou Road, Prior Lake, MN. 55372
LAWP-F1LES\REV\96\96-107.2
$.
Y
0 3
Q W
U Z
a to
a
a�ul
Z
a Z
_J Q
a
W F-
H CO
CC
U
LA
C rn
C rn
C ct
CAI
CD
O
1•••,a ;
ilj�t1
Z
o 5,111
ll
o IIHN
aces-ce A' -es_'1off 1%44"oS
en[.,p xnWU40^Wa
NM OM1.3N
S.N3W NVUSI81-10
O
L
o
sj5
�yy TiJIM
E
Q
�
j
!t
1111111111111illiill II
II
P! 1
s
�%
{{
i
.t.s..es. EEtsasEsas
��l�i E 1
[
,
EL
m
O
—` lilt3 •ALS
-ETM Ys�axay
=�7,
'4m�01FOIM4"cb
4D^IJQ xnwu4m^WU
FRO
7. o
�
liltIr
Z r
€E
It
>IU OM13N
W
S.N3W NVI-LSIMHO
� 10.
CQ
Q
0
P
i
W
s
a
JR-Qi
..
City of Southlake, Texas
CASE NO: ZA 96-85
STAFF CONTACT:
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-208, First Reading
Rezoning and Concept Plan/Stone Bridge Park
Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Stone Bridge Park, being approximately
13.583 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tract 2D
LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and approximately
600' Northwest of the intersection of Randol Mill Ave. and West
Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709)
OWNER: H.C. and Maxine Forester
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District
AMENDED REQUEST: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" uses in the rear of the
site and "C-2" uses along F.M. 1709.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include residential and limited low
intensity office and/or retail uses);
Mixed Use (may include residential, office buildings, hotels, and
commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs);
100 Year Flood Plain ,,
CORRIDOR Retail Commercial - F.M. 1709 (same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and
RECOMMENDATION: B-1 districts);
Residential (any Single Family district)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12)
RESPONSES: None
P & Z ACTION: August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0)
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table until the September 3, 1996
City Council Meeting
8� -1
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996.
L:\WP-FILES\WMO\96CASES\9CO85ZC.WPD
4.
SA-'
6612
68
IAIA
;
cow i
687A
681A
��—._.:�.—
i
'-'" •_'--L'-F.�. -i-•4�
.
686
1 A1A
6ez 26
tAlA
x
WA
2
IA1A
2D
l 2
E
lAl
w -i--
! •r
— -4 i 1! 1
tAlA2f
-- 1 ; i
i 1
t
685
683
IAIA20
_-�
i 1 li �•, i/
% 1
1
KFUFR
p
LIMlT
�- ; ;
4f
i
3D1
B
3A 3
>E JEI
B
D
D
D
f 1
s1Ae>Er A-3/! 18
1
3 3F1D
NO, 317C
Y,„
1
1
2
3
9A
`,'O R�
-
3m
Y9
3F18
3fl11
1
; 2A1
1
3nj
3N(
3D2
981
., IEl
IJ
to m 1• !
.� r
—i
_
]FI
YIE
i i
IEi-
i
3tl
311E
3G
Ni
i
11•
90
•-'t
60 AC—•
-
--
Y6
]FIA
i
103
\ 1 i
-•� '1
-
_
10
S<lF
•'•
._.y
43
�
]C
7
78
IA
6
6p
BA2B
'rNl+�
1 j
i
'•1-
- VJOHN
W. FRE
I
®
UIR
Ac
2.9
1
k
SUr" A,=
19 Ac
3-3
6 Ac
I
9.51X
297.5
Ac
OE
_.� .—_._.
1
At
•—
I
_
— i
4e
i i i j i
�_.1—i1—L.• '
•.--
i
•T—
—
9.64 Ac
BA3
B 8 88
I —
70
ROAD
8
8 J
2 3 :
i
I
\ - _
_
•• �7,pp—
t
lE zC5
2C7
2C3
gut
3D 3E
6 8
120120
I _
1 1�
"
B
Flown
at snf
- ---
'
jC/
__��_._ �
�/
4
MA
30
�
R�
GAR
Lures. 12.8
9CHOOI.
At
c
.`
i i _•--_--• jy .T._._.
; `_ �'�1M8?Ti��
2 B l 20 Ac
J 2A3 2A2
xu
�tGo p�
84 N
—
--- .
O ,
K_
App�l�
"
1
t
— '
-
3A
_y_
UAc
EA ES
o
ALD
'
21`1
Z 2A5
t
20 Ac
._-.-.- �•- *
-
204 2C15
i
lei
2A1Tic
JAI
6 Ae
2C27 2C26
E
2At'_
�
2A
2A6
I
.EST
IAl
"""r - . '• 5AU 4
6 Ac
sA
_
A
_-
1
p np
lS
r—
1
G 1D
zs
t
n
L'
MtA 4E01
7i
H4
40A
1
A-►8
50
2
Ic "I
—
1
17 2 k
5 At
145 At
3
! J. Qp
•---� J
4A12
A
4E
4K1
4V
t
_
4
six
10 Ac 4N
4F
3 d4 Ac
5AI
15.2$ Arl 15.4 Ac
—.
1 A
1M
.
i 1G
S AtAR
it
alit
u
4
.__._
�•---_-'
`�
IA28
5 At 2
Q
6A1
88
W2
6
f>E
; i!
�'r
A-750
..
40
6Ac
2 Ac
5Ac
7
-
_
i i i'
ID
6
'
46
4C
'
6C4 6C2
�
9
9.65 Ac l
9.65 Ac
9.85 Ac
193 Ac
6AIA
11 Ac
WCl
1 2A
I 4
�
6C3
� � i i_ i
�
Ac
6E1
�cv _ cri.- • - 6E2 _
I81 I616 1�A
7.86 Ac -�'� 13rk
u
-411
'M
TRACT MAP'
3a•
3
N
KaLM
aTY UW7
5A i 1�Y p i _
❑ ;. �,-
--
,
I,
N
1127 Ac �i 1 '�;
w _OLL
r"
P dF1AfNfART
;
L"
3AI
..�( fA I
5 58 - ; ; SCHOOL —
_y'
fir ; ;
,
�.
np �a
CLS °Q U
25 At
;
i
ADJACENT OWNERS spin Representative #16
_AND ZONING-
1
p �•� •t"7-9: 5�(� __ _ _ t Y ktc'1'IF.�K�� E� fL �i� :i. 3 �.
�'3"ORii' •`W[
117
i '�, ice`
a223°y� SF-1'A }i R.
( ES
-
• 6A
J. Bedgood - O. Collins !
R- Garner ;
"SF_1 A, -
C --- o
47
"SF-1 A"
7 N zs
-- D. Brown
„AG;. I I i
Ia. _j ati l
lY
R. Miller
1� �V
so 4 .
TR :
J. Martin ♦ " .
� t
6 AATR 2A4 TR. 2A+�A .,
.0 C � i S
/ 88.xc,
AG
�e
4
R. Milled
'R.2F1
TR .
TR 2F1A �A ZF3 ��� .� `, 2A3 TR ITR:.,
r
�+ 2A 12A'
.0J 08@ 'f A/�j G" I �+ t .46 3A 11A
"C211 t ® .46 45
"SF1 A"
I Metzer Dairies t
"'' •' C. Lam I
"SF1 A" C. Hallmark) TR 2A5�
J. Hettinger i N 1 /2 \ TR 2A
- g _ O " AC i TR
_� 29
.49
r.. , Y 1
City of Southlake, Texas
CONCEPT/L SUMMARY
ProjectCase No: ZA 96-85 Review No: 3�n Date of Review: 8/30/96
iiyyo 2 Zai ng with id fStone Brft PuL 13M Acres.
in 1hei Su=
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECT:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON =6/9¢ AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
t
1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties:
A. Correctly label the Land Use Designation for all adjacent properties (i.e. L.U.D. = Low
Density Residential, L.U.D. = Mixed Use). Refer to the approved City Land Use Map.
B. Show and label properties located on the south side of F.M. 1709. Include the owner's name,
the Zoning and Land Use Designation.
2. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards:
A. Show (with dashed lines and/or shading) and label the width and VW of bufferyards.
B. Correct or provide the following bufferyards:
1. East property line adjacent to Lots 6 and 7 Drake Estates -10' Type F1 Bufferyard.
2. The north lines of Lots 1 and 2 require a 10' Type `B' Bufferyard.
3. Relocate the bufferyards along the north line of Lot 1 and the south line of Lot 3,
adjacent to the Retention pond, to the banks of the pond.
3. An F1 fence meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Sect. 42, Illustration `B" page 42-13 and/or a
minimum 8' high screening device meeting the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480,
Sections 33.2, 33.3, and 39 is required along the north line of Lot 3. The applicant has proposed a 6
wrought iron fence along extending west from the west tree line of the.existing trees located in the
northeast corner of the lot.
City of Southlake, Texas
4. The following changes are needed with regard to building lines:
A. Correct the west building setback line of Lot 1. The minimum setback required is V.
However, should the proposed building on the exceed one story or 20' in height (measured
UBC standard) the required setback will be determined by a 4:1 slope line from the property
line. No part of the building can encroach above the slope line.
B. Correct the east building setback line of Lot 3 adjacent to Lots 6 and 7 Drake Estates. The
minimum setback required is 25'.
C. Show the SO'building line adjacent to F.M. 1709 with a dashed line.
D. Provide a 30' building setback line on Lots 1, 2 and 3 adjacent to the proposed street. The
proposed 6000 s.f office building in the southeast portion of Lot 3 and the bank drive-thru
canopy in Lot 2 appear to encroach this setback line.
E. Provide a 15' setback line along the north lines of Lots 1 and 2, and along the south line of Lot
3. The proposed bank drive-thru canopy in Lot 2 appears to encroach this setback line.
5. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways entrances to the site and compliance with
the Driveway No. 634:
A. The minimum spacing required between the centerline of the western most driveway
intersecting F.M. 1709 from Lot 1 and the northwest intersection of the proposed street and
F.M. 1709 is 500'. It appears the provided spacing is approximately 3851.
B. Provide the required driveway throat depth for traffic stacking. The minimum throat depth
required for each driveway entering Lot 3 from the proposed street is 50'. The throat depth
provided for the most southerly driveway in Lot 3 intersecting the east line of the proposed
street is approximately 10' and the most southerly driveway in Lot 3 intersecting the west line
of the proposed street is approximately 10'.
6. Label the proposed street as "R.O.W." and specify R.O.W. width.
7. Correct the line designating the split between C-2 and 0-1 uses to follow proposed lot lines.
8. Provide a listing of any proposed variances from the underlying zoning districts of C-2 and 0-1.
City of Southlake, Texas
* Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-85" in the lower
right corner for ease of reference.
* The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to the next scheduled meeting must be
received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/9/'96. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared
until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include
an i1 "x 17" revised reduction.
* Building articulation requirements will not be reviewed at the Concept Plan level. This issue will be
addressed upon review of the Site Plans. Please note that all buildings must meet the architectural
standards of the Corridor Overlay Zone Regulations as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance 480, Section
43.9.c. L(c) as well as all other applicable requirements of the Corridor Overlay Zone Regulations.
* Although no review of required parking or interior landscape is provided at the Concept Plan level,
staff strongly recommends that the lot be evaluated for compliance with the off-street parking
requirements per Ord. 480, Section 35, and the interior landscape area requirements per the Landscape
Ordinance No. 544 prior to preparation of any site plans. The applicant should be aware that all areas
intended for vehicular use musi be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance and all fire lanes must be per the City Fire Department.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a plat must be processed
through the City and filed in the County Plat Records and a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation
plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid.
This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water &
Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
The minimum setback required along the west property line of Lot 1, adjacent to the Miller tracts is
40'. However, should the proposed building on the exceed one story or 20' in height (measured UBC
standard) the required setback will be determined by a 4:1 slope line from the property line. No part
of the building can encroach above the slope line.
P & ZACTION: August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0)
COUNCIL ACTION August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table until the September 3,'1996 City
Council Meeting
* Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Realty Capital Corp.
Morley Architects
LAWP- 5M
r�
r
fl:r�.r"
pM=,s
po
di3 ,
r
F
�a
r'
nzifig
R
wU:
� / r
t �
p I
� n I
1�
61:0 '
I � 1• yTf
r
o Q e y,t
,a e # 1
-
I y ,
1 y
1
. I
j' ti e
v
1
1
,..� I• • jjMj RrR � � { •
ilt Q
Stone Wee Park
Souddalm Blvd.
soudualae, Tom. fiE
,
er #kE�Rt
--_
:xr
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article Xl, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City IWS the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as
WM under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
r WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cityof Southlake, Texas at a public hearing called b P g Y
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-208.SP2 A (`
Page 1
(am." changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
(we original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract ortracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
L:\CTYDOCs\oRD\CASES\480-208.SP2 1�
Paget � ���
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
L:\CTYDOCS\oRD\CASES\480-208.SP2
Page 3 �� � ��
QW, such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
(ame ATTEST:
A
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-208.SP2
Page 4
.,
C.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-208.SP2
Page 5
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
r.
EXHIBIT "A"
BOGINNIriG nk • m fotaM 1/ i wit: I'Nd .= tie South lithe` of
TIMrry TaCAstc' an . e to t-hs �itiy.' of: Sgiitleike^;
Y. Tpias POW
.f&:� '� . z+tt: cr€ '5 "= o€
valuate 388-99 iri' .tiE a Tatrraiit': ` ! `*
1►t dnd = bed' by.
deed East .. a"•dfiatance'of '682;g4;;egti. 8,'E - 1s-iliatbnce
of 1033.5 feet, eiiei N;:860 45';. & .:.6..:�iq� of 5I7'. 0 -feft f6c:6
the- Northwest �comdr of said 3:G..:A1
TEiENCi N 85.-- 411 .:15" _£ al" :tbe lit�ef laic. TtER
ESTATES a; d Uti� of 48J 2 € tc#=a.folsitd.:i/2:ii # irc�tt itidT
'THENCE. N 73� 49!aloog;t South line of saw ..TitiNE:
ESTATES a distatloe of 40$ 5.: � ii 2 irx t r«t r ari�i
being in the .West :line 'af . DRAxE 'BST n atdditiat do tltia City
of Soiitttlaycey _`I`#=ant minty., s aogoiYliitci, to flat �ceo�id
on page 68 of Volume 388=124 Tit the Z�cYraxs :Oautty Plat Reooxdss.
THENCE S 4 ..12' 8 : a rti stance, of $8.94 feeE to a $ suzA 14 inch
iroct rod at the- Northw6d aai:rt�r of `tbt ?.j .'sait2 nRAXE FSTATf ;
THENCE S So 08' 25'. E d di�starux tit` •85.:44 feet to . a found
1/2 inch ircxt , rod, in. thr� : Notth " l" *'off S &it
huke _ ;8ouleveird
and being at the Southwest - corder o¢ 1bt - 4" J . Gs _" At "-No; 18
ADDITION, an .addition to the C Y of-- todellake, Tarrant County.,.
TtxAs according to plat-.;ecorded .Tin $1146 Ii253•- of .Cabinet A" in
the Tarrant County Plat Records.;
mews S. Sao. 331 :5.0% w a g ; tti : a li -lino. of 6aid wegt
Southlake " 166de- vard : a d.i staike -of .2�,01. feet- to a ...concrete
Highway Depa tzstetit t " ' th8- i sSgr.of a curve �t10
ric�h� havigg a . radiu3g: of $.$f.. wtdse center. beads
N 36 27' 11" W a di.stattco.
THENCE Sotittiiaastierly along. s
- � ' - " .- . , . ... " . -North
:-,•K .
ad:W curve aiid alc��g tk�s Noa: th
of said West .s66thiake uoi 1—. >+$ a tough ce.GYxai_: i�gie..of
120 30' 5$" a'•distance of -403 6'.fe66:.to'A--seti.-.5/8 Tech iftn-
roci; a
TfiENGE N: t96 32' 10": -W- Q. dj aaitYa ?of :; 37 fti to '�
1/2 tfAch Yin rod:;
-mark N zo 00' S. A di;8� of ..,134..74 . feet pXaCe of
beginning, oontafning of
land.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-208.SP2 �� ����
Page 6
Im
N
LACTYDOC
Page 7
EXHIBIT °Brr
,r
Aso
1� •
r
n
ar
� � r
f i
a s jig !
1 J
i 1 G L
1 rc
1 � p
n wJ I C a'�r
M
e� r I .' �� i •�
iY N w' '
4rbt� `_ I r•••' 0
j
I � up
r
I •• t
i Q �
F •/ • • yyi� + .
(C � i � .as• •c �'
�j_ ram' i• �ta•ir _:: � 1 � � ���i� �i
V. ;?Tot.— � y ri ` j
C� fit
• a a I
w
D j Sfone Bddge Park SA,14Southlake Bind.1
mC1RD�CASES148o-208.sP2 Southlake,'Ic�icas.
City of Southlake, Texas
TAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 6= 9 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Southlake Oaks Addition
STAFF CONTACT: Tom Elgin, Planner II 481-5581, Ext. 753
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, Ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Southlake Oaks being
approximately 4.164 acres situated in the Littleberry G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686, and being legally described as being Tract 3C.
This plan proposes two commercial lots.
LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of Shady Oaks Dr. and E.
Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709).
OWNER: Fischer and Company
APPLICANT: Halff Associates
CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District
' .AND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity
office and/or retail uses)
CORRIDOR DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial (Same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and B-1
districts)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12)
RESPONSES: One (1) written response received within the 200' notification area:
• Marvin Kennedy, P.O. Box 412, Seagoville, TX, 7SI59, in
favor
P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1996; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table item to
the August 22, 1996, meeting.
August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996.
WPD
—Z_ 5.53 Ac „B BA BA11 BA16 `— E
11C I1E 8 B SA BA8A1 ® B 8 IEI t 1FF42A 43L tBA3 B 1182A 891A oHLA L
_ ykz BA15 A 8B1C 3 Ass
C
8A9 BA
IIC1 MAA 11C2 11 BAI 9A 88t8
IIE 98 10
ID
i %i� i � _ I iiii t`•
ov
�.
35 A<
crw
Y•Y� r l i l i i i i i� i i i i i i •� �% .�- i ��
r- �.- i_ ItA?A m i i i i i i i i i• i I �"�"1 _ ,i.i �P
3A
TR 38113 I i
F�
Spin Representative #13
Shady Oaks Group Jim W. Goggin
-7 1 I
.,o
i
City of Sout/hllake City of Southlake
lqA
lA � TI H p
Southlake Four / 1 4.2758 9 ,.,--2
Investments ,
I/AG" 3C 3 42
G. . HALL TR 38
4A URVEY 2.98 AC
— 686
I State of Texas R.O.W.
q
Southlake 1R 2rI ..::G ;. 1( 404 .a2 0
TR 3D.5 ._
//�211
—i
,ri%o .
,1 1N�
11L
Shady Oaks Lmt
A✓
.— ..- illt
18 .+ C T P. 3c
e "n_n" 1/�2 i �
u Pierce T =C, i, c. r Lake Crest= . ' l�� LL LL
"R_ Doi)
11 Homes > 0, i t ;' HOA W 1F .�„ 9
w v�l :_.i �-1�7 �+ C. Lam 25 0 ,13i t/
N "
.. 21 8 SF-20A"
434
CD
' Clardy �ffnek
134 10 F, .
— \ E.Owen
22 M. Kennedy \� /
16 2
1x '•. � 1 `
15 o�`a' 23 1•AG11 11 11 —1 g 1 .�--, -
132 —
,y j 1
` Q � 24, .I
9 3 25 I
.I
4 170 144
10 26
W EADO 27
1a SIG
e
28
:-, " 29
`16 1•r
1Y �
18 -Y
ADJACENT OWNERS
AND ZONING
16 - 17 _ �B
p 4
�n �� -
7A� .� a
1., 6
t
l
TP. 3A
8
13.861 AC j t
I
City of Southlake, Texas
Case No: ZA 96-89 -
. . W,-1, %AV&' _X V 8 L I ' 1
Review No: Two
Date of Review: 0 6
Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, 1709 Southlake Oaks, 41642 Acres in the
Littleberry G. Hall Survey Abstract No 686
APPLICANT:
Fischer & Co.
13355 Noel Road 24th Floor
Dallas. Texas 75240
Phone : 214) 980-7100
Fax : (214) 750-4419 Attn: Dick Skorburiz_
SURVEYOR:
Halff Associates. Inc.
8616 Northwest Plaza Drive
Dallas. Texas 75225
Phone: 214) 739-0094
Fax : (214) 739-0095
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/26/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties:
A. Provide the corresponding deed record volume and page for tracts shown to be owned by the
State of Texas.
B. Provide the complete existing zoning designation for all adjacent properties including
properties across adjacent R.O.W. (e.g. SF-20A Single Family Residential, 0-1 Office,
AG Agricultural, etc.)
2. Provide a minimum 10' Drainage Easement for the underground drainage improvements in accordance
with the preliminary drainage plan. Also designate the corresponding portions of the 10' and 15' U.E.s
along the south line of the property as drainage easements.
3. Provide the net acreage (after R.O.W. dedication) in the "Quantitative Land Use Schedule."
* The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, park:
dedication requirements, off -site sewer extensions, and oil site grade -to -drain permission.
Denotes Informational Comment
cc: Fischer & Co.
Halff Associates, Inc.
AWP-FILES\REV\96\%-089PP.2
tj
119
11.14
—A,
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
_ August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-104 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-215, First Reading
Rezoning - R.D. Price Survey
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property described as being approximately 1.57 acres
situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992, and being a portion
of Tract 1 and a portion of Tract 2.
LOCATION: North White Chapel Blvd. approximately 530' north of the intersection
of Bob Jones Road and North White Chapel Blvd.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Perry R. and Jimme Kay Reeder
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District.
REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and
retail uses)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8)
RESPONSES: Two (2) written response were received within the 200' notification area:
• Marie Grigsby, 311 29th Ave, Moline, IL 61265, in favor.
• James Evans, 9426 Braddock Rd. Fairfax, VA, in favor.
P & Z ACTION:
August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0). ..
STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant is proposing a Preliminary Plat with two (2) residential
lots, Lot 1 being approximately 1.57 acres, less required R.O.W.
dedication with proposed zoning change from "AG" to "SF- IN', and Lot
2 being approximately 10.5 acres, less required R.O.W. dedication with
proposed zoning change from "AG" to "RE".
L.\W P-FELES\MEMO\96CASES\96-104ZC. W PD
,B b-1
IUH
TRACT MAP
I.C. BELCHER
��1�ffsCfRt�.�asra
W. PHILLIPS
SK/EY A-100V
H.
AG
2
No
fSSOP,
013 4jqPY
"SF—lAo'
"AG" R Cooper
9.615 ID
Showtime Farms Inc- TR 0
. r, AC
tit-71A
iF
13
-Aj G. Fernandez
A11
9
@@AG
L. Holcomb
2 AC
G. Fernandez
tl;Al
J. Evans
"SF-1 A
10
A. Escobedo
�D
0 P4 I'SF-1 A" c:�
Cl)
"AG19
Ic
E. Hurst
M Grigsby
1K 4A i R 3 TR 2
6 AC
AC 10.5 AC
12
ADJACENT OWNERS
AND ZONING TR 1
10 A
Spin Representative #1
Cara white
[.
TR 14 3.76 AC. TR 15 5.3 AC TR 16 183 AC 1 AC
TR 16
-X I AC
\10
'„
`
Y
Ek
i
:D
T
W
e 8+�
Cat
J
q�q:K
�T
X
L'
Q
IL3i
W
r
LU
i
K
�
K E d2
S
Or.
J
1
< tl
0 g
7-1
O
P+
p�
<O
D C
�...�.
i- •'� Fj
ZS i • d�. .., � a
l� 9 A['CLZI 3
e
-
G � �
HWHON a.
NORTH
ov
(a� eFO
v i
et
(�(ss77
0011
y O
< Z
X F
U
<
m
<
jq C
W i.i r
V z�
aW
N C
U
�ao�o p
,
w
iuw <
W
M o
z <
o
F
O
'L <
<
z
m
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as
+ +uuxlder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-215.SF1 ^ �-5'\
Page 1 ✓�
(awl facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands. them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September,1989, as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
Being approximately M acres situated in th
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-215.SF1 \
Page 8p—�
and more fully ant
completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from
i 'f''�,, , t'i :c tr
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the toning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-215.SF1
Page 3 j j
(WWI Section 9. _ The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall -additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
0
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 11996.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-215.SFI
Page 4 8w q)
rm
(moo,
ATTEST:
A
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-215.SF1 /'�
Page 5 80 1
.,
ON
EXHIBIT "A"
BEGINNING at a concrete monument (No D319-1-1) found in the
common survey line of the above mentioned R. D. PRICE SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 992, and the A. ROBINSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1131,
same also beiyig in the West line of White Chapel Road (formally
known as Pleasant Run Road), same also being North 88 degrees 57
minutes 55 seconds West 90.54 feet from the Northwest corner of
Lot 13, Block B of LAKEWOOD RIDGE ADDITION, an Addition to the
City of Southlake, Texas, according *to the Plat recorded in
Volume 14, at Page 5, Plat Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE - South 08 degrees 55 minutes 26 seconds East along said
West line of White Chapel Road for a distance of 252.54 feet to a
3/8 inch capped iron rod set for corner;
THENCE South 00 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds East along said
West line of White Chapel Road for a distance of 104.21 feet to a
3/8 inch capped iron rod set for corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West for a distance
of 205.81 feet to a 3/8 inch capped iron rod set for corner
THENCE North 00 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds West for a distance
of 356.43 feet to a 3/8 inch capped iron rod set for corner in
the common line between R. D. PRICE SURVEY and A. ROBINSON
SURVEY;
THENCE North 89 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds East along said
common line between R. D. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 992, and A.
ROBINSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1311, for a distance of 170.53 feet
to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 68,681.50 square feet or 1.5767 acres of land, more or
less.
L:\CTYDOCS\ORDkCASES\480-215.SFI
Page 6
..
City of Southlake, Texas
F�������
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-105 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-216, First Reading
Zoning Change - R.D. Price Survey No. 992
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property described as being approximately 10.5 acres
situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992, and being a portion
of Tract 1 and a portion of Tract 2
LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Bob Jones Road and North White
Chapel Blvd.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Marie Grigsby.
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may also include limited low intensity office
and/or retail uses);
NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9)
RESPONSES: Two (2) written responses were received within the 200' notification area:
• Marie Grigsby, 31129th Ave, Moline, IL 61265, in favor.
• James Evans, 9426 Braddocd Rd., Fairfax VA 22032, in favor.
P & Z ACTION:
August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0). ,,
STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant is proposing a Preliminary Plat with two (2) residential
lots, Lot 1 being approximately 1.57 acres, less required R.O.W.
dedication with proposed zoning change from "AG" to "SF-lA", and Lot
2 being approximately 10.5 acres, less required R.O.W. dedication with
proposed zoning change from "AG" to "RE".
L.\WP-FILES\ I MO\96CASFS\96-105ZC.WPD
8E-�
`,,, - TRACT MAP
I.G. BELC HER r
st4" Y A-= tIf`
off
1.IJ= � ��=•f.
6'
_ _ }
JjjjL�jJF:-&-M)Flj ILIP. jiJ [,:0LF=
H. HARRIS
30"Cr A JW
"-
W. PHIL LIPS
A
HVJHIrGiV i UVVNt:Kb
AND ZONING
Spin Representative #1
Cara White
3
fys 0.4
1.)013 09-
"SF-1
R —1 All
4
"AG" Cooper
9.615 0
Showtime Farms Inc.
'rR r r= \ 1
M 7�4.5 AC.'
!; "SF-1 A
8
Fernandez
.3
R. GoSF-1A
Gory f
TR 1 9
2 AG L. Holcomb
i "SF-1 All
10
A. Escobedo
"AG" 0 04 "SF-1 A" In
Ic
J. Evans cc E. Hurst
TR 4A R
TR 2 i "SF-1 A"
6 AC 1 AC 10.5 AC 12 -
C. Smith
TR 14 .3.76 AC.-
TR 1 00-00
A f--% It 10 A?�_
TR 15 5.3 AC TR 16 Entek Corp.
1 1 AC I -
�A
R
AG J. Evans I AC
M Grigsby
TR-
r _
z� 1 a
C'2 J
LD
_$S W
i �• z• s• - �_ !
LU
$s as z: ea a
,oaf •(4fgt`! y"
Ila
HUlON
NORTH
x fQa
!6 ! R
O
eg
!e
Fl
t
w� .
.l
dtEttt•� �.
0
,OL•S[LI I 3 AV.ZS 00 N
Cl
0
y
J
�
i
�
J
r
s
�
G
a
Etd
O
y � e
f�
pC
E
QQ g7
O�3 R
Obi
y O
a Z
U
> ~
zm
W <
ZZ
V O
W
a=
N O U
JJfWa
8
m
>0 Otr
i O
R
cc W <
W
a a
W< � W <
W
M O
Ii H
Z <
o „
F o
O O
< IV
a <
W
m
(Moe
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article M, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and,use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as
sunder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
(W WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
LACTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-216.RE
Page 1 OE -5)
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, arid' protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view
to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout
this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are
called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September,1989, as originally adopted and amended,
is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed
and amended as shown and described below:
awe
Being approximately M acres situated in th
L: \CTYDOMORDTASEM480-216. RE
Page 2 Q F _(Q )
and more fully and
completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from
itiollgi�to d F .
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map
of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above
described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and
all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been
made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land;
to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances
except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land
described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the coning
of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or
refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any
and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to
such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court
or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
L: \CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-216. RE
Page 3 6 ic- -
(OW, Section 9._ The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the
proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and
if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any
of its provisions, then the City Secretary shalt additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
0
0
Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the lst reading the day of , 1996.
MAYOR
GANW11I
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996.
LACTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-216.RE
Page 4
MAYOR
.,
A
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
LACTYDOMORDWASEM480-216AE
Page 5 g [—q
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
r.
EXHIBIT "A"
BEGINNING at a point in the common survey line of the above mentioned R D. Price Survey, Abstract
No. 992, and the A Robinson Survey, Abstract No_ 1131 bearing South 89 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds
East, 170.53 feet from a concrete monument (No. D319-1-1) found in the said common survey line, -same
also being in the west line of White Chapel Road;
THENCE North 00 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds West 356.42 feet to a point for comer,
THENCE North 89 degrees 06 seconds 38 minutes East 205.81 feet to a point for comer in the west line
of White Chapel Road;
THENCE South 00 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds Fast 302.85 feet along the said west line of White'
Chapel to a 3/8 inch capped iron rod set for comer,
THENCE East 27.61 feet to the centerline of White Chapel Road;
THENCE South 00 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds East 618.53 feet along said centerline of White
Chapel Road to the intersection of the centerline of Bob Jones Road and said centerline of
White Chapel Road;
THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West 451.00 feet along said centerline of Bob Jones
Road to a point for comer;
THENCE North 00 degrees 52 minutes 53 seconds East 1,275.70 feet to a point for comer in said
Common survey line between R D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992 and A Robinson Survey,
Abstract No. 1131;
THENCE North 89 degrees 50 minutes O3 seconds East 178.14 feet along said common survey line to
the Point of Beginning and containing 10.5 acres of land
M
L: \CTYDOCS%ORD\CASES%480-216. RE
Page 6 Br `) O\
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
CASE NO: ZA 96-106 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat/Block 1, Lots 1&2, Reeder Place
STAFF CONTACT: Tom Elgin, Planner II 481-5581, Ext. 753
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, Ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Block 1, Lots 1 & 2, Reeder Place, being
approximately 12.1097 acres as recorded in Volume 1221, Page 121
D.R.D.C.T. and being situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No.
992 and being a portion of Tracts 1 & 2.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Bob Jones Road and North
White Chapel Blvd.
OWNER: Marie Grigsby
APPLICANT: Perry R. and Jimme Kay Reeder
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
AND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office
and/or retail uses)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7)
RESPONSES: Two (2) written responses were received within the 200' notification
area:
• Marie Grigsby, 31129th Ave, Moline, IL 61265, in favor.
• James Evans, 9426 Braddock Rd., Fairfax, VA 22032, in favor.
P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1996; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table item to
the August 22, 1996, meeting.
August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996.
:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-106PP. WPD
tou I
I.Q. 02LCH2R
7 6
31
�
TRACT MAP
SfA41E'1' A -IOW
t �
'.
I
SF-Z _
W. PHILLIP3
SWWY A-fOI7D
TR 4A
6 AC
i
j
i
I
TR 13
1.10 AC
ADJACENT OWNERS
AND ZONING
Spin Representative #1
Cara White
I
INso , N
s y OBADS
�4a "AG"
1
9.615 0
Showtime Farms Inc.
,ts
\ TR 1
\ 2 AC
„AG,.
J. Evans
3 TR 2
1 AC 10.5 AC
i
TR 14 3.76 AC I TR 15 5.3 AC
"AG" J. Evans
T
�..
4R. Coo e
TR r- r
.5 AC "SF-1 A"
i3
rd
9.
L4
"SF-1 A"
10
7IT A. Escobedo
'I
"SF-1 A"
E. Hurst
I
"SF-1 All
12
C. Smith
W
A
a
d
0
M
I
"AG..
I TR 1
' 10 A
I i
1
I
TR 16 Entek Corp.
1 AC
ACWR
I
1 AG
M Grigsby
City of Southlake, Texas
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
No: ZA 96-106 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/30/96
Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Reeder Place,
121097 Acres in the R. D. Price Surygy. Abstract No 992
APPLICANT:
Perry R. and Jimme Kay Reeder
300 Supreme Court
Irving. Texas 75061
Phone: (214) 986-4097
Fax
SURVEYOR:
Dewev and Associates.
2505 Texas Drive, Suite 110
Irving. Texas 75062
Phone: 214)255-1501
Fax
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/26/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787.
1. The following changes are needed with regard to surrounding properties:
a. Show and label the plat revision of lots 3R and 4R in Lakewood Ridge Addition recorded in
Cabinet "L", page 178, PRDCT. (Northeast of site)
b. Correct the existing zoning on the adjacent watts property to show "AG" zoning.
2. Provide in the legal description.the deed record references for all current owners within the property
being platted.
3. Show, label and dimension the existing ROW along the property. The labeling as shown appears as
if the ultimate ROW has been dedicated and this is not the case.
4. The following changes are required regarding easements:
a. Provide a drainage easement across the north end of both lots sufficient to meet the city's
drainage criteria.
b. Label the benefactor of the "Reserved Easement" in Lot 1 and define its purpose.
5. Provide an interior lot dimension on the east line of lot 2.
6. Show and label any flood plain, floodway limits, and/or flowage easement.
cc: Dewey and Associates
Perry and Kay Reeder
LA\VP-FILES\REV\96\96-106PP.2
BSA
s s s a sa ?
Iva v
GC
•. l¢ a i {I IS i t t 1 tP� C
ZjL �1���•� �a �a �aI ass �a i� aj{�!
J
d
6
'a
�Q
■
a
t+t
•
J
i
4
♦y
•i
`
iy
ppi
t . E
{t 9
�
B
t
gg i =�
•4
�
p
�i
�sE♦�♦ai6
b
I•
n,:.au..,
C
i
gm �.
I
i
Q
■i
3 CS.LLW N
`E+
•p�
\b
8! Y
�
Q
1
aLaL3
H1NON
NORTH
Fp
t
O S ?
4 QQ EtE
i W T
N
On
01
< O
< _
X r
�m
W
Z
Q W N
N C W
aJ 3
�o
O ic O
q t
J W
<
a Q $ z
a r
in !
r
W ""
W
'
O W
r
Z <
0
F psi
O
< 04
< 6
2
m
F
City of Southiake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk
FROM: Lou Ann Heath
SUBJECT: Resolution 96-57, Amending the Fee Schedule
In September, 1993, the Council approved Ordinance 592, which provides a mechanism to
establish city fees. The Council can change, delete, or add fees for services by Resolution at any
time. Each year during the budget preparation process, the Schedule of Fees is reviewed by all
departments.
Resolution 96-57 is presented for consideration and proposes changes to the Parks Activities fees.
These changes were recommended by the Parks and Recreation Board, and are outlined in the
attached August 27, 1996 memo from Park Director, Kim Lenoir.
You may notice that this Schedule of Fees retains Exhibit "A", Perimeter Street Fees, and Exhibit
"B", Critical Drainage Structures. When the City adopted the Street Impact Fee Ordinance in
August, 1996 these fees were superseded. However, it is recommended that these exhibits remain
part of the fee schedule for a year. These would be used for a development that qualifies under
regulations in place prior to adoption of street impact fees. Retaining the exhibits will ensure that
these transitional cases, if any, pay their applicable share of fees.
Please place Resolution 96-57 on the September 3 agenda for Council consideration.
City of Southlake, Texas
August 27, 1996
TO: LouAnn Heath, Director of Finance
FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Recommended Fee Schedule Changes
Attached is the Parks and Recreation Board's recommended changes to the fee schedule
for park activities. In summary, the following was recommended:
Security Deposit increase from $50 to $100 is needed to reinforce that the City
expects the users of the Community Center and The Lodge to take care of the
facilities and not abuse it. The facilities are heavily used and a new procedure of
checking in the user group and checking out the user will be used to help reinforce
that the user groups need to take care of their community facilities.
Replace the annual regular meeting fee of $25 with a per meeting fee of $3.00
due to the wide range of regular meeting users from twice a month to four times
a year. To be more fair in pricing, a per meeting fee is recommended.
Increases in rental fees of ballfields, soccer fields, multi -use court and the sand
volleyball court due to heavier use and higher costs of maintenance. These fees
were at the lower range of fees charged in the area. The increases recommended
are at the upper range of a fee survey that was conducted in the Metroplex by the
Dallas / Fort Worth Metro Area Parks and Recreation Director's Organization.
If you have any questions please contact me at 481-5581 extension 757.
cc: Shana Yelverton, ACM
a
(W Activity
04
3.
4.
5.
(mr,
6.
A
**FY 1996-97 Fees Schedule for Parks Activities
Building Reservations for Residents:
Security Deposit $39 9A $100i0q (refundable)
Regular Meetings Reservation Fee $25-()0 Fer year
$30,0
Week day meeting $10.00/hr
Building Reservations for Special Activities:
Security Deposit
The Lodge (with Kitchen)
Community Center/room
Community Center/entire bldg
Organized Athletic Programs
TVNCR Rental Fee
$50.00- $ Oz � (refundable)
$15.00/hr
$15.00/rm/hr
$35.00/hr
$1,000,000.00 General Liability Insurance Policy
No charge with reservation
Equipment Rentals: (Driver's license held)
Tennis Racket & Balls No charge
Volleyballs No charge
Basketballs No charge
Reservations of Park Facilities:
Security Deposit
$50.00 (refundable)
Hilltop Picnic Area
$5.00/4 hrs
Pine Tree Picnic Area
$5.00/4 hrs
Bicentennial Pavilion
$8.00/4 hrs
7. Reservations for Fields and Courts:
Ballfields (No Lights) W. `9" . ` '--' field
Ballfields (With Lights) °'' ^^" hr- field $ Q O
Soccer Fields $ 0" 5 hr/fee $�Sw jq
Field Preparation Fees:
Weekday Games
Weekend Games
$25.00/field
$37.50/field
Multi -use Court (Hockey / Basketball)$!9.004v $ 6'
Multi -use Court (with lights) $i 5.00fhr $2(
Sand Volleyball Courts $5.09An4ee 1
Tennis Courts $5.00/1.5 hr/court
"Recommended by the Parks & Recreation Board 8/22/96
9�3
RESOLUTION NO. 96-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-46; PROVIDING THAT
THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-46, NO. 94-61, NO.
95-05, NO. 95-34, NO. 95-50; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake heretofore adopted Ordinance No.
592 providing for the adoption of fees and revisions thereto from time to time by resolution; and
WHEREAS,the City Council with Resolution No. 94-46 set a schedule of fees for certain
services; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed the Park Activities fees and has determined
that certain fees should be amended in the fee schedule.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That Schedule of Fees, Section IV., Park Activities, #1, #2, and #7, be amended
per the attached Schedule of Fees.
Section 2. That this resolution shall be cumulative of all provisions of Resolution No. 94-46
of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this resolution are in direct
conflict with provisions of such resolution, in which event the conflicting provisions of such
resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 3. That the fee established herein shall be effective upon passage of this Resolution
and shall take precedence over any fees previously adopted which are in conflict herewith.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
H:\WP FHXSWRD-RF.SAGRW&57.FFPhb
A
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
Mayor Rick Stacy
99- --
/.
, 1996.
IN
ACTIVITY
FEE
SECTION I. Administrative Activities
1.
NSF Check Return Charge
$20.00
2.
Copy Charges
$.10/page
3.
Water Service Customer Listing
$1.00/computer page
4.
Water Customer Mailing Labels
$35.00
5.
Offense/Accident Report : (Amended Res. #95-50)
Basic
$ 4.00
Certified
$ 6.00
Written Certification that no report exists
$ 4.00
6.
Burning Permits
$0.00
7.
Ambulance Fees:
Transport -Baylor, Grapevine (w/o oxygen)
$150.00
Transport -Baylor, Grapevine (with oxygen)
$160.00
Transport -Other Hospitals (w/o oxygen)
$300.00
Transport -Other Hospitals (with oxygen)
$310.00
8.
House Moving Permit
$10.00 + $1,000 Surety Bond + 1.5
x hourly rate of 2 police officers
utilized in the move
9.
Solicitation/Vendor Permit
$35.00 (Co. license) +$10.00/Agent
+ $1,000 Surety Bond
10.
Seasonal Permits
$25.00
11.
Vital Statistics:
Certificate of Death
$9.00 / 1st copy 3.00 each add'1 copy
at time of initial request
Certificate of Birth (Amended Res. #95-34)
$13.00 / copy
H.\ WP-FUMMORD-RES.AGR\9CH996.FEE
94-15-
ACTIVITY FEE
12. Wrecker Permit Fee: (Amended Res.a94-61)
Permit fee per wrecker vehicle $24.00 per year
(waived for contract agency)
Permit Fee per authorized driver $12.00 per year
(waived for contract agency)
SECTION lI. Community Development
Activities
1.
Board of Adjustment requests
$200.00/request
2.
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance
$200.00/request
3.
Zoning Only
$200.00 + $10/Acre
4.
Concept Plan Only
$200.00 + $10/Acre
5.
Zoning & Concept Plan
$300.00 + $10/Acre
6.
Zoning and Site Plan
$300.00 + $10/Acre
7.
Zoning/Concept & Site Plan
$500.00 + $10/Acre
8.
Specific Use Permit
$200.00 + $10/Acre
9.
Site Plans
$300.00 + $10/Acre
10.
Amended Plat s 4 lots
$200.00 + $20/Lot/Res
$200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
11.
Amended Plat > 4 lots
$300.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
12.
Plat Showing (1 lot)
$200.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
13.
Plat Showing (multiple lots)
$300.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $20/Ac/Comm
14.
Preliminary Plat (Non-P.U.D.)
$300.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
15. Preliminary Plat (P.U.D.) $300.00 + $30/Lot-Res
(W $300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm
H:\WP-FILES�ORIYRFS.AGR\SCH996.FEE
ACTIVITY
ELL
(bo" 16.
Final Plat (Non-P.U.D.)
$300.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
17.
Final Plat (P.U.D.)
$300.00 + $30/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm
18.
Plat Revision
$300.00 + $20/Lot-Res
$300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm
19.
Plat Vacation
$200.00 Flat Fee
20.
Rush Plat Filing
$300.00 Flat Fee
21.
Two -County Filing
$50.00 Flat Fee
22.
Extra Plat Page Filing
$20.00 Flat Fee
23.
Mapping (1:1000) -Blueprint
$20.00 per map
-Color
$30.00 per map
24.
Mapping (1:2000)-Black/White
$5.00 per map
-Color
" ��
$10.00 per map
25.
Mapping 11 x 17 plat reduction copies
$2.00 per map
26.
Mapping (digital tape format)(naaea Reg. #95-34)
$140.00 per tape
27.
Street Name Change
$100.00 per street
28.
Temporary Batch Plant Permit
$.00 per Permit
29.
Tree Removal Permit
$.00 per Permit
30.
Park land Dedication- Raw acreage cost
$25,000.00 per acre
SECTION III. Public Works Activities
1.
Administrative Processing Fee
2 % Actual Construction Cost
2.
Computer Drainage Study:
HEC I:
$400.00 + $10/Linear Foot
HEC II:
$400.00 + $10/Linear Foot
3.
Construction Inspection
3 % Actual Construction Cost
H:\WP-FREMORD-RES.AGR\SCH996.FEE
P-7
ACTIVITY
EFL
4.
Street Cut Permit
$15.00 per Street
5.
Easement Abandonments
$150.00 Flat Fee
6.
R.O.W. Abandonments
$150.00 Flat Fee
7.
Easement/R.O. W. Dedications
$100.00 per Easement
8.
Water Tap Fee
I" Meter
$360.00
2" Meter
$600.00
4" Meter
$1,900.00
6" Meter
$2,777.00
8" Meter
$4,054.00
9.
Sewer Tap Fee
$75.00
10.
Sewer Participation Fee (Added Res. #95-34)
$1,300/lot
11.
Water Administrative Service Charge
$15.00
12.
Water Deposits:
Residential Accounts
$50.00
Commercial Accounts
Reviewed by Utility Billing
Supervisor
13.
Fire Plug Meter Deposit (City Meter)
$650.00
Fire Plug Meter Deposit (Own Meter)
$100.00
14.
Water Reconnect Fees for Non -Payment,
Business Days Only:
8 a.m.-5 p.m.: lst/2nd/3rd & subsequent
$20/$40/$60
After 5 p.m.: 1st/2nd/3rd & subsequent
$40/$60/$80
Weekends, anytime
$40/$60/$80
15.
Water Meter Re -installation Fee
$50.00
16.
Water Meter Reread Fee
$5.00
17.
Damaged or Broken Lock
$25.00
18.
Late Utility Payment Fee
5 % of Outstanding Balance
H:\WP-FILES�ORD-RFS.AGR\SCH996.FEE R
ACTIVITY EM
19.
Street Light Costs
Developer pays installation + 2-year
operation cost
20.
Building Permit Fees
Per the currently adopted U.B.C.
(Administrative Code)
21.
Water Well Permit
$42.00
22.
Tent Permit
$15.00
23.
Sign Permit, Permanent Type (1 - 50 sq ft)
$50.00 minimum
Sign Permit, Permanent Type (> 50 sq ft)
$1.00 / sq ft
Sign Permit, Temporary Type
$25.00
Illuminated Sign, Electrical Permit
$35.00 (in addition to above)
24.
Request for Variance to Sign Ordinance
$100.00/request
25
Culvert and/or Approach Permit
$42.00
26.
Building Contractor's Registration Fee
$75.00
27.
Perimeter Street Fees (Amended Res.#95-05, Res. #95-34)
See Exhibit "A"
28.
Critical Drainage Structure Fees. (Added Res. #95-34)
See Exhibit "B"
SECTION IV. Park Activities (Amended Res. #95-34, es .
1. Building Reservations for Residents:
(refundable)
Week day meeting
2. Building Reservations for Special Activities:
.......................
......................
Security Deposit $50.N 1'# r� (refundable)
The Lodge (with Kitchen) $15.00/hr
Community Center/room $15.00/rm/hr
Community Center/entire building $35.00/hr
3. Organized Athletic Programs $1,000,000 General Liability Insurance Policy
4. TV/VCR Rental Fee No charge with reservation
HA WP•FH"0RD-RES.AGR\SCH996.FEE
�� 9
FEE
(44", 5. Equipment Rental: (Driver's license held)
Tennis Racket & Balls No charge
Volleyballs
Basketballs
A
6. Reservations of Park Facilities:
Security Deposit
Hilltop Picnic Area
Pine Tree Picnic Area
Bicentennial Pavilion
7. Reservations for Fields and Courts:
Ballfields (No Lights) $7.50" hiifield
Ballfields (With Lights) $ ` 00" ` hr- fte'
Soccer Fields 0" .`-riild
Field Preparation Fees:
Weekday Games
Weekend Games
No charge
No charge
$50.00 (refundable)
$5.00/4 hrs
$5.00/4 hrs
$8.00/4 hrs
$25.00/field
$37.50/field
Multi -use Court (Hockey/Basketball)$19-69fk. >f l
Multi -use Court (With Lights) $15.90ihr € '
Sand Volleyball Courts-99,�h�'eee
:...:....:....:::.:.........
.:..:..:.:.....:::...::.
Tennis Courts $5.0011.5 hr/court
H:\WP-RL-%ORQRFS.AGR\SCH9%.FEE
�/40
Exhibit "A"
Perimeter Street Fees
September 5, 1995
PER -LINEAR -FOOT COST ESTIMATES
Roadway Cost Cost
Classification Per Linear Foot Per Linear Foot
without Drainage with Drainage
Arterial - Interim 24' Section
No curb & Gutter - 4" HMAC
$60.00
$105.00
Arterial - Interim 48' Section
No Curb & Gutter - 4" HMAC
$105.00
$200.00
Arterial - Ultimate A4D Boulevard Section
With Curb & Gutter
$165.00
$220.00
Arterial - Ultimate A41) Boulevard Section
With Curb & Gutter - 6" PCC
$190.00
$250.00
Arterial - Ultimate A5U Undivided Section
With Curb & Gutter - 7" HMAC
$190.00
$255.00
Arterial - Ultimate A5U Undivided Section
With Curb & Gutter - 6" PCC
$230.00
$305.00
Arterial - Ultimate A4U Undivided Section
With Curb & Gutter - 7" HMAC
$145.00
$195.00
Arterial - Ultimate A4U Undivided Section
With Curb & Gutter - 6" PCC
$175.00
$235.00
Collector - Interim 24' Section
No Curb & Gutter - 4" HMAC
$60.00
$105.00
Collector - Interim 48' Section
No Curb & Gutter - 4" HMAC
$105.00
$200.00
Collector - Ultimate C2U Section
With Curb & Gutter - 7" HMAC
$120.00
$160.00
F:\WP-FILES\ORD-RES.AGR\FEESEXA.WPD4ahfkb(9.95) 94? `//
(W Exhibit "A"
Perimeter Street Fees
September 5, 1995
PER -LINEAR -FOOT COST ESTIMATES
Roadway Cost Cost
Classification Per Linear Foot Per Linear Foot
without Drainage with Drainage
Collector - Ultimate C2U Section
With Curb & Gutter - 6" PCC $135.00 $180.00
Residential Street - R2U Residential Street or
Cul De Sac - 31' Section
With Curb & Gutter - 6" HMAC $90.00 $115.00
Residential Street - R2U Residential Street or
Cul De Sac - 31' Section
With Curb & Gutter - 5" PCC $110.00 $145.00
HMAC = Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete
PCC = Portland Cement Concrete
PLF = Per Linear Foot
F:\WP-FILFMOiLD-RES.AGR\FEESEXA.WPDdah/kb (9-95)
Exhibit "B"
Schedule of Fees
Critical Drainage Structures
per Engineering Report dated June 1995
Cheatham & Associates
Drainage Structure Fee Per Acre
1.
Structure crosses T.W. King Road at
approximately 1,250 ft. north of Bob Jones Road
$437.34
2.
Structure crosses N. White Chapel Blvd. at
Kirkwood Branch
$149.11
3.
Structure crosses N. White Chapel Blvd. at
south fork of Kirkwood Branch
$186.15
4.
Structure crosses W. Dove Street approx.
900' west of N. Peytonville Ave.
$307.40
5.
Structure crosses W. Dove Street approx.
300 ft. west of Shady Oaks Drive
$331.38
6.
Structure crosses E. Dove Street at Dove Creek
$235.74
7.
Structure crosses Plantation Drive at Higgins Branch
$280.91
8.
Structure crosses Shady Oaks Dr. at approx. 2,800'
south of W. Dove Street
$479.34
9.
Structure crosses N. Carroll Ave. at approx. 3,600'
north of State Highway 114
$278.14
10.
Structure crosses W. Highland St. approx. 300'
east of Shady Oaks Drive
$694.29
11.
Structure crosses Dove Creek Trail at approx.
1,000' south of Highland Street
$466.91
12.
Structure crosses East Highland St. at approx.
1,650' east on N. Carroll Ave.
$983.63
13.
Structure crosses North Kimball Ave. at approx.
2,800' north of State Highway 114
$371.20
14.
Structure crosses Shady Lane at approx. 2,800'
north of State Highway 114
$222.80
15.
Structure crosses North Kimball Ave. approx.
800' north of State Highway 114
$406.50
16.
Structure crosses Florence Rd. at approx.
3,000' west of Randol Mill Ave.
$563.01
17.
Structure crosses Johnson Rd. at approx.
18.
1,700' west of Randol Mill Ave.
Structure crosses Southlake corporate limits
$408.88
at approx. 600' west of FM1938.
$212.61
F:\WP-FILES%ORD-RES.AGR\FEESIXR.WPD-lah/KB (9.95)
A /3
(W Exhibit "B"
Schedule of Fees
Critical Drainage Structures
per Engineering Report dated June 1995
Cheatham & Associates
Drainage Structure
Fee Per Acre
19.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. at west
side of S. Peytonville Ave.
$417.61
20.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. below
Timberlake Addition
$214.29
21.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. adjacent
to S. Carroll Ave.
$760.28
22.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. approx. .
2,800' east of S. White Chapel Blvd.
$566.02
23.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. approx.
1,100' west of S. Carroll Ave.
$309.83
24.
Structure crosses W. Continental Blvd. adjacent
to S. Carroll Ave.
$652.13
25.
Structure crosses S. Carroll Ave. adjacent to
E. Continental Blvd.
$614.87
26.
Structure crosses S. White Chapel Blvd. at
Big Bear Creek
not developed
27.
Structure crosses E. Continental Blvd. approx.
1,800' west of S. Kimball Ave.
$878.95
culvert cost
$2,850/l.f.
IM
F:1WP-FILES\ORD-RES.AGA\FEESEXB.WPD.WM(9-95) y� /31
City of Southlake, Texas
August 30, 1996
TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program
At the August 20 City Council meeting, staff presented an interlocal agreement with the City of
Fort Worth for participation in a regional household hazardous waste (HHW) collection event.
Councilmember Harris requested staff to (1) investigate the possibility of joining with Denton or
other area cities in a household hazardous waste collection event, and (2) determine if the
September 1, 1996 deadline for signing the agreement could be extended.
I have contacted the cities of Denton and Arlington, and Tarrant County. Denton does not have
a HHW collection event. They try to find alternative disposal methods dependent upon the waste
involved (e.g., donation of old paint to charities or taking it to Dallas for incineration). The City
of Denton also has its own chemical laboratory which can assist with classification of unknown
substances and chemical neutralization if needed.
Arlington has applied for a grant to hold its own HHW event in April of 1997. They do not
participate with Fort Worth due to the indemnification clause in the interlocal agreement. Their
event will include Dalworthington Gardens and Pantego only, since these cities are completely
surrounded by the City of Arlington. Their event is not open to any other cities.
The Fort Worth event will include participation by many of our surrounding communities,
including Grapevine, Colleyville, Keller, Hurst, Euless, Bedford, and North Richland Hills. The
cities of Lake Worth, Kennedale, and Mansfield have declined to participate this year, although
all of them had participated last year. Lake Worth declined due to money problems. I do not
know the other cities' reasons for declining.
The City Council can delay a decision on this issue until its September 17 meeting if they so
desire, however, Wednesday, September 4, 1996, is the deadline to be included on all promotional
material. Tarrant County must submit their 45-day plan by September 10, but we can be included
after that date if we choose to participate.
If you have any further questions for me, I will be happy to answer them.
W --
City of Southlake, Texas
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION WITH FORT WORTH IN
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION, AND
GUARANTEEING THAT AD VALOREM TAXES WILL BE
LEVIED AND A SINKING FUND CREATED IN THE EVENT
ANY LIABILITY ARISES BY REASON OF THIS CONTRACT.
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake recognizes that improper disposal of household hazardous
wastes contributes to non -point source stormwater pollution, and
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is interested in providing its residents a convenient,
accessible and cost-effective means of collecting, disposing, and/or recycling their household
hazardous wastes, and
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to enter into an interlocal agreement with the City
of Fort Worth for participation in the October 26, 1996 Household Hazardous Waste Collection event,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS:
Section 1. That the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the
body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety.
Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with the City
of Fort Worth for participation in the October 26, 1996 Household Hazardous Waste Collection event.
Section 3. The City of Southlake does hereby agree to release, indemnify, defend, reimburse, and hold
harmless the participating cities, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers, as set forth in the attached
Interlocal Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste Collection. During each year while there is any liability
by reason of said contract, including the calendar year 1996, the City Council of Southlake shall compute and
ascertain the rate and amount of ad valorem tax, based on the latest approved tax rolls of Southlake, with full
allowances being made for tax delinquencies and costs of tax collection, which will be sufficient to raise and
produce the money required to pay any sums which may be or become due during any such year, in no instance
to be less than two percent (2`Yo) of such obligation, together with all interest thereon, because of the obligation
assumed. Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax is hereby ordered to be levied and is hereby levied against
all taxable property in Southlake for each year while any liability exists by reason of the obligation undertaken
by the contract, and said ad valorem tax shall be assessed and collected each year until all of the obligations
herein incurred shall have been discharged and all liability hereunder discharged.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1995.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
By:
Rick Stacy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of ,
1996, by and between the City of Fort Worth, Texas, a home -rule
municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas,
hereinafter called "Fort Worth," acting herein by and through
Charles Boswell, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and
the City of f a
municipality situated in Tarrant County,
Texas, hereinafter called "Participating City," acting herein by
and through its duly
authorized
W I T N E S E T H:
WHEREAS, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, authorizes the
formulation of interlocal cooperation agreements between and among
municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Texas Government Code, §791.011 provides that a
local government may contract with another to perform governmental
functions and services, and §791.003 (3) (H) defines waste disposal
as a governmental function and service; and
WHEREAS, Texas Government Code, §791.025 provides that a
local government may agree with another local government to
purchase services; and
WHEREAS, Fort Worth and Participating City desire to enter
into an interlocal agreement whereby Fort Worth will purchase the
services of a disposal firm and administer a household hazardous
waste collection event; and
WHEREAS, Fort Worth and, Participating City mutually desire
to be subject to the provisions of Texas Government Code, Chapter
791, also known as the Interlocal Cooperation Act;
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
PAGE 1
1.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this contract, the following definitions
shall apply:
Environmental damages shall mean all claims, judgments, damages,
losses, penalties, fines, liabilities (including strict
liability), encumbrances, liens, costs, and expenses of
investigation and defense of any claim, whether or not such claim
is ultimately defeated, and of any good faith settlement of
judgment, of whatever kind or nature, contingent or otherwise,
matured or unmatured, foreseeable or unforeseeable, including
without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements
and consultant's fees, any of which are incurred subsequent to the
execution of this agreement as a result of the the handling,
collection, transportation, storage, disposal, treatment,
recovery, and/or reuse of waste pursuant to this agreement, or the
existence of a violation of environmental requirements pertaining
to same, and including without limitation:
(a) Damages for personal injury and death, or injury to
property or natural resources;
(b) Fees incurred for the services of attorneys,
consultants, contractors, experts, laboratories and all
other costs incurred in connection with the
investigation or remediation of such wastes or
violation of environmental requirements including, but
not limited to, the preparation of any feasibility
studies or reports or the performance of any cleanup,
remediation, removal, response, abatement, containment,
closure, restoration or monitoring work required by any
federal, state or local governmental agency or
political subdivision, or otherwise expended in
connection with the existence of such wastes or
violations of environmental requirements, and including
without limitation any attorney's fees, costs and
expenses incurred in enforcing this contract or
collecting any sums due hereunder; and
(c) Liability to any third person or governmental agency to
indemnify such person or agency for costs expended in
connection with the items referenced in subparagraph
(b) herein.
Environmental requirements shall mean all applicable present and
future statutes, regulations, rules, ordinances, codes, licenses,
permits, orders, approvals, plans, authorizations, concessions,
IPTPERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
PAGE 2
franchises, and similar items, of all governmental agencies,
departments, commissions, boards, bureaus, or instrumentalities of
the United States, states, and political subdivisions thereof and
all applicable judicial, administrative, and regulatory decrees,
judgments, and orders relating to the protection of human health
or the environment, including without limitation:
(a) All requirements, including but not limited to those
pertaining to reporting, licensing, permitting,
investigation, and remediation of emissions,
discharges, releases, or threatened releases of
hazardous materials, pollutants, contaminants, or
hazardous or toxic substances, materials, or wastes
whether solid, liquid, or gaseous in nature, into the
air, surfacewater, groundwater, stormwater, or land, or
relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution,
use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport, or
handling of pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous or
toxic substances, materials, or wastes, whether solid,
liquid, or gaseous in nature; and
(b) All requirements pertaining to the protection of the
health and safety of employees or the public.
Force majeure shall include decrees of or restraints by a
governmental instrumentality, acts of God, work stoppages due to
labor disputes or strikes, failure of Fort Worth's contractor(s)
to perform pursuant to their agreements with Fort Worth for the
conduct of the collection event, fires, explosions, epidemics;
riots, war, rebellion, and sabotage.
Fort Worth collection center shall mean the location(s) to be used
within the city limits of Fort Worth.
Household hazardous waste shall mean any solid waste generated in
a household by a consumer which, except for the exclusion provided
for in 40 Code of Federal Regulations §261.4(b)(1), would be
classified as a hazardous waste under 40 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 261.
Participating cities, when used in the plural, shall mean the City
of Fort Worth, Participating City, and all other cities which have
entered into interlocal agreements with the City of Fort Worth for
the household hazardous waste collection event.
Person shall mean an individual, corporation, organization,
government,or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust,
partnership, association, or any other legal entity.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PAGE 3
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
M 7 45"
Satellite collection centers shall mean those location(s) used for
collection which are located outside the city limits of Fort
Worth.
Waste shall have the same meaning as "solid waste" as that term is
defined in Texas Health and Safety Code §361.003, and including
hazardous substances.
2.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Interlocal Agreement (hereafter
"Contract") is to enter into an agreement between Fort Worth and
and Participating City, whereby, subject to the terms and
conditions specified below, Fort Worth agrees to purchase the
services of a household hazardous waste disposal firm and
administer and supervise a regional household hazardous waste
collection event, which will be available to households within
Participating City.
3.
DUTIES OF PARTICIPATING CITY
Participating City agrees to perform the following duties in
connection with the household hazardous waste collection event:
A. Designate one of its employees to serve on the
household hazardous waste collection event planning
committee;
B. Recruit its citizens to volunteer as workers at the
event.
C. Coordinate and fund all event advertising targeted to
its own citizens, as it deems necessary.
4.
ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF A PARTICIPATING CITY
IN WHICH A SATELLITE COLLECTION CENTER IS LOCATED
If Fort Worth and Participating City agree separately that a
satellite collection center will be located in Participating City,
Participating City agrees to perform the following services in
connection with the household hazardous waste collection event:
A. Designate one of its employees to coordinate the event
at the satellite collection center with Fort Worth;
B. Provide solid waste disposal
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
9A-6
for boxes, empty
PAGE 4
containers and other materials brought to the satellite
collection center during the event which can be
disposed of in a municipal landfill.
C. Provide traffic control, including barricades, cones
and police officers as necessary at the satellite
collection center and adjacent public streets during
the event.
D. Provide sufficient volunteers to handle traffic
control, participant surveys, and handling of
recyclable materials at the satellite collection center
during the event.
5.
SERVICES OF FORT WORTH
Fort Worth agrees to perform the following services in
connection with the household hazardous waste collection event:
A. Administer and supervise a regional household hazardous
waste collection event on Saturday, October 26, 1996,
at the Fort Worth collection center, and at the
satellite collection center.
B. Chair a planning committee comprised of cities in the
region which are participating in the event.
C. Provide a centrally located collection site within Fort
Worth for the event.
D. Employ personnel, perform administrative activities,
and provide administrative services necessary to
perform this Contract.
E. Cause the event to be advertised in the Fort Worth
Star -Telegram.
F. Enter into a contract with a household hazardous waste
disposal firm for the handling, collection,
transportation, storage, disposal, treatment,
recovery, and/or reuse of household hazardous waste
collected at the event. Such firm shall be required
pursuant to the contract to assume generator status for
the waste collected at the event, excluding materials
recycled pursuant to subsection G below, to choose a
disposal site for the waste subject to Fort Worth's
approval, and to indemnify Fort Worth and all
participating cities.
IN ERLOCAL AGRKEKMIT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE CCLLECTION
f49,7
p14a e
G. Arrange for recycling vendors for used oil, batteries
and anti -freeze at no cost to participating cities.
6.
RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF WASTE
Fort Worth and its contractor shall have the right to refuse
to accept waste at the event from a resident of any of the
participating cities and to eject such individual from the
premises of the event if in the reasonable judgment of Fort Worth
or its contractor:
A. The waste is not household hazardous waste;
B. The waste fails to meet other criteria established for
the event;
C. The individual does not have sufficient identification
to establish that he/she is in fact a resident of any
of the participating cities; or
D. The waste or the individual presents a hazard to the
event or to persons or property at the event.
7.
COMPENSATION
A. Participating City agrees to pay Fort Worth the sum of
$ 5,253 ( Five thousand,two hudred fiftythree
dollars and no cents) as
compensation for its share of the non -grant funded
costs for the event, which is an amount that fairly
compensates Fort Worth for its services under this
Contract. This sum shall be paid to Fort Worth no
later than ten (10) days following receipt by
Participating City of a final cost accounting for the
event from Fort Worth, and shall be paid from funds
currently available to Participating City.
B. The above sum is based upon an estimated
seve8ty (70) households from Participating City
taking part in the event. If after the conclusion of
the event there are committed funds as set out above
from participating Tarrant County cities left
unexpended by Fort Worth on the event, the sum agreed
to be paid above shall be reduced on a pro rata basis
provided the actual cost for the number of households
from Participating City that took part in the event
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
♦ h 4
9A-8
PAGE 6
did not exceed the sum agreed to be paid above.
C. The cost accounting provided by Fort Worth shall
include figures for the total number of households
participating in the event, the number of Participating
City's households participating in the event, and the
total waste collected at the event.
8.
INDEMNIFICATION
A. Participating City does hereby release, indemnify,
reimburse, defend, and hold harmless the participating
cities, their officers, agents, employees, and
volunteers, from and against any and all liability,
claims, suits, demands, or causes of action which may
arise due to any loss or damage to personal property, or
personal injury, and/or death occurring as a consequence
of the performance of this Contract, when such injuries,
death, or damages are caused by the sole negligence of
Participating City, its officers, agents, employees or
volunteers, or the joint negligence of Participating
City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers, and
any other person or entity with the exception of the
indemnified city.
B. Environmental Indemnification
1. To the extent of its allocated liability as set
forth in paragraph (B)(3) below, each of the
participating cities does hereby release, indemnify,
defend, reimburse, and hold harmless the
participating cities, their officers, agents,
employees and volunteers, against any and all
environmental damages resulting from the handling,
collection, transportation, storage, disposal,
treatment, recovery, and/or reuse, by any person, of
waste which was collected pursuant to this Contract.
2. To the extent of its allocated liability as set
forth in paragraph (B)(3) below, each of the
participating cities does hereby release, indemnify,
defend, reimburse, and hold harmless the
participating cities, their officers, agents,
employees and volunteers, against any and all
violations by any person of any environmental
requirements pertaining to the handling, collection,
transportation, storage, disposal, treatment,
recovery, and/or reuse of waste collected pursuant
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
PAGE 7
to this Contract.
3. Fort Worth and Participating City recognize that a
"cradle -to -grave" responsibility exists for waste
collected at the event. Fort Worth and
Participating City recognize that it will not be
possible to identify one city's waste from
another's once the waste has been aggregated. Fort
Worth and Participating City further recognize
that it is necessary to create an equitable
allocation of liability among the participating
cities for the waste collected at the event.
Therefore, Fort Worth and Participating City agree
that the allocated liability of each of the
participating cities under this paragraph (B)
shall be calculated as follows:
the actual number of a city's households
contributing waste to the event divided by
the actual number of total households
contributing waste to the event = X percent.
X percent = the percentage of the total
volume of waste collected at the event for
which such city shall be liable.
C. The obligations of the participating cities under this
Section shall include, but not be limited to, the
burden and expense of defending all claims, suits and
administrative proceedings (with counsel reasonably
approved by the indemnified parties), even if such
claims, suits or proceedings are groundless, false, or
fraudulent, and conducting all negotiations of any
description, and paying and discharging, when and as
the same become due, any and all judgments, penalties
or other sums due against such indemnified persons.
D. The obligations of the participating cities under this
Section shall survive the expiration of this Contract
and the discharge of all other obligations owed by the
parties to each other hereunder.
E. The participating cities agree that their City Council
resolutions (or whatever mechanism is used) that
approve this Contract will contain substantially the
following language:
does hereby agree to
release, indemnify, defend, reimburse, and hold harmless
the participating cities, their officers, agents,
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
9? -/0
9A-10
PAGE 8
employees and volunteers, as set forth in the attached
Interlocal Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste
Collection. During each year while there is any liability
by reason of said contract, including the calendar year
1996, the City Council of said City shall compute and
ascertain the rate and amount of ad valorem tax, based on
the latest approved tax rolls of said City, with full
allowances being made for tax delinquencies and costs of
tax collection, which will be sufficient to raise and
produce the money required to pay any sums which may be or
become due during any such year, in no instance to be less
than two percent (2.) of such obligation, together with
all interest thereon, because of the obligation assumed.
Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax is hereby ordered
to be levied and is hereby levied against all taxable
property in said City for each year while any liability
exists by reason of the obligation undertaken by the
contract, and said ad valorem tax shall be assessed and
collected each year until all of the obligations herein
incurred shall have been discharged and all liability
hereunder discharged.
Participating City shall submit to Fort Worth a certified
copy of the resolution containing the above language, no
later than ten business days prior to the day of the event.
If Participating City or fails to make this submission as
required, it shall not be permitted to participate in the
event.
9.
IMMUNITY
It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution
of this Contract, none of the participating cities waives, nor
shall be hereby deemed to waive, any immunity or defense that
would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the
exercise of governmental powers and functions, and that the
services described in this agreement are a governmental function.
10.
FORCE MAJEURE
A delay or failure of Fort Worth or of a Participating City
with a satellite collection center to perform services pursuant to
this Contract shall be excused to the extent that the delay or
failure to perform resulted from a force majeure event, and the
delay or failure was beyond the control of Fort Worth or said
Participating City and not due to its fault or negligence.
Participating City and Fort Worth shall not have, and hereby
waive, any claim whatever for any damages resulting from delays or
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
9A-11
PAGE 9
failure to perform caused by a force majeure event.
11.
TERMINATION
Fort Worth and Participating City shall each have the right
to terminate this Contract upon thirty (30) days' written notice
to the other parties.
12.
NOTICE
Any notices required to be given under this Contract shall be
delivered as follows:
If to Fort Worth:
Brian Boerner, CHMM
Senior Environmental Compliance Specialist
Department of Environmental Management
1000 Throckmorton
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
If to Participating City:
City Secretary
City of Southlake
1725 E. Southlake Boulevard
Southlake. TX 76092
13.
ENTIRETY
This Contract contains all commitments and agreements of the
parties hereto, and no other oral or written commitments shall
have any force or effect if not contained herein.
14.
SEVERABILITY
In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in
this Contract shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal,
or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and
this Contract shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable provisions had never been contained herein.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
Ijo�1.2-
9A-12
PAGE 10
15.
VENUE
Should any action, real or asserted, at law or in equity,
arise out of the terms and conditions of this Contract, venue for
said action shall be in Tarrant County, Texas.
16.
AUTHORITY
This Contract is made for Fort Worth and Participating City
as an Interlocal Agreement, pursuant to Texas Government Code,
Chapter 791.
17.
AUTHORIZATION
The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto
are properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority
to execute this contract on behalf of the parties hereto, and each
party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions
extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in full
force and effect.
EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE this day of
1996, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
By:
Charles Boswell
Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
9A-13
Iwo
PARTICIPATING CITY
TITLE
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
PAGE 11
City of Southlake, Texas
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 1996
r
CASE NO: ZA 96-86 PROJECT: Site Plan - Rockenbaugh Elementary School
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator 481-5581, Ext. 743
Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581, Ext. 787
REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Rockenbaugh Elementary School, being approximately
15.357 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, being
portions of Tracts 2, 2A3, and 2B.
This plan proposes a 67,500 s.f. elementary school.
LOCATION: South of E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) on the proposed Byron Nelson
Parkway, approximately 810' south of the intersection of E. Southlake
Blvd. And Diamond Blvd.
OWNER: Carroll ISD
APPLICANT: Cheatham & Associates
CURRENT ZONING: "PUD" Planned Unit Development District
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include residential and limited low
intensity office and/or retail uses)
NO. NOTICES SENT: Four (4)
RESPONSES: None
P & Z ACTION: August 15, 1996; Approved (6-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 1
dated August 2, 1996, amended as follows:
1) deleting item #5 (required driveway throat depth)
COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Staff Review Summary No.
1 deleting Item #5 (driveway throat depth) and modifying the northern
driveway to provide 3 lanes (the northernmost drive for buses only)
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 2 dated August 30, 1996. Please
note the attached letter from Brent Kline of TPM immediately following
this report concerning the north entry of the site.
L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-086SP.WPD
11)6-1
August 28, 1996
Re: Rockenbaugh Elementary School - Entrance Drives (Revised)
Attn: Mr. Greg Last
Dear Greg
We would like to request, on behalf of the Carroll Independent School District, a reconsideration of the
City. Council's approval of the site plan for this project. The reason for this request is that we are very
concerned about the modifications made by the City Council that evening. We were a little unsure of
the exact modifications that were approved, so, please refer to the attached sketchs Schemes A & B for
the two possible layouts. We have also attached our preferred geometric layout. The day after the City
Council meeting, I received a call from Dean Stuller with ITS, (traffic consultant), with concerns about
the modifications. His concerns are as follows:
• The approved plan would setup conflicting traffic flow on site, which could cause a parent to
maneuver around the end of the median, between the buss entrance and the parent exit, thinking that
they were to be on the right side of the median. Thus causing the parent to turn into oncoming buss
traffic.
Their company was hired as the traffic expert, and by choosing a plan different than what they
recommend, the responsibility falls in the hands of those who changed the plan.. We feel it would be
worth while to reconsider, thus we would like to resubmit the entry drives to be approved as originally_
drawn, with the exception of the modification of a slight modification to the internal drive connections
on the south drives.
Sincerely
Brent E. Kline RA, CSI
D:\PROJECTS\CARROLL\WORDP\LTR6.DOC
XC: CURTIS HAWK, BOB WHITEHEAD, DEAN STULLER, RANDY LOFPIS, AND EDDIE CHEATHAM
0
REC'D AUG 2 9 '1996
128 E. Texas St. 1812 Welsh, ste. 130C 163 S. Main, ste. A 551 1 Parkcrest Dr. #207 3000 S. 31,t St., ste. 307
Grapevine, Texas 76051 College Station, Texas 77840 Keller. Texas 76248 Austin, Texas 78731 Temple, Texas 76502
(817)488-7732 (409)693-5650 (817)431-1129 (512)454-2580 (817)899-2776
fax(817)488-9708 fax(409)693-6996 fax(817tdl1-1583 tax(5 12) 454-2630 fax(817)899-2789
i o B-.2
I®
oc Z
d
lob-5
.EST wG
AN
STREET
5A
&MAI co
T&W
—am
W
11
8
882A
aa
, 1.1
ac
8818
PAW
f
3c
SG
WN
31
A
HpD
34
3(1
20klW
423
3H
39
Me COLNrr LAST
ZA
281,
4 Ac
4.5Ac
JA
-j
4 Ac
4 Ac
58
6 Ac rrt
10 Ac 5xc
w
PAft
5M
PEI
Dn IV,
D
4C VA�
G]
182 1F
IA
Y 5A,�,RR
ic 101 IF W1
c a
.46.64 Ac
IDU
ID2 WA
3A & 3A2
Ic
24.91 Ac
4
HALL
ITION
W.W. HALL
IAJ
rSLn
Cy A-687
Ap!
SLIMY A-M
RICH RD
A-
ri
4c
IA
5
2E
my
HAM
3A
10 Ac 1 6 Ac I V` 1-�43 Ac
2AS
ages—
—iT
25
22 Ac ,.:-30�3A 3D3 3c
3 Ac
7.665 Ac 14 A, DI38
JD2 ---1 3 Ac
"2'63kl 304 3D
5c 3A 3A x 30
AC 3w Al C
-3k tjAC 56 Ac
Ac 30.6 Ac ;.,--I
i --�,
wmm
TRACT MAP - ��)
IA
I
co
jrc
P- �{
<
M <
H 0�
N
C
I
m
-
ry
r
_LL
m
I`•\ O
�\ E
01\
�1
N
U
-
<
Q
M J)
CIO
=
r
Cl)
w
W
Z
CD�
Z
0Z
Y
p
= o
Y
�
LI
0
2
L
NNam`
�
= J
Q
�Q.
Q
Cf)
Case No.: ZA 96-86
City of Southlake, Texas
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Review No: Two
Date of Review: 8/30/96
Project Name: Site Plan - Rockenbaugh Elementary School, Carroll I.S.D., Lot 1, Block 60, Timarron
Addition, Phase 5. being 15.357 Acres, W.O. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
APPLICANT:
Carroll Independent School District
1201 N. Carroll Avenue
Southlake, Texas 76092
Phone: (817) 481-5775
Fax
ENGINEER:
heatham & Associates
1601 E. Lamar Boulevard. Suite 200
Arlington. Texas 76011
Phone: (817) 548-0696
Fax :(817) 265-8532
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/28/96 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ORNEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT..787.CITY
1. Include "Carroll I.S.D., Rockenbaugh Elementary School" in the Site Plan title. Change the block
number to 60.
2. Correct the lotting shown for the proposed commercial site adjacent to the north line. Only one lot
(Lot 2, Block 60) exists per the approved preliminary plat.
3. Show and label the width and type of proposed bufferyard on the graphic. Distinguish the bufferyard
areas with dashed lines and cross hatch or shading. Provide all required bufferyards and correct the
bufferyard calculation chart as shown on the attached chart.
With regard to the note on the previous plan submitted addressing the use of existing
vegetation along the east and south bufferyards, credit may be given for existing plants
following the criteria stated in the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 42.4.g.
4. The following changes are needed with regard to the required landscape area and plantings:
A. Show the location of all interior landscape areas to be provided on the graphic (use shading
or cross hatch to distinguish).
B. Correct the landscape credit, the required landscape area, and plantings shown in the chart.
The maximum landscape credit is 20% of the required area. The enhanced pavement credit is
based on 2 s.f. of enhanced pavement for 1 s.f. of reduced landscape area up to a maximum
reduction of 10%. A 10 % reduction in the required landscape area is permitted if turf grass
is planted, irrigated, and maintained in 100% of the R.O.W. parkway fronting the site. The
provided landscape area and plantings must meet or exceed the minimum requirements.
C. The "Existing Tree Credit" described in note `c' must comply with Section 4.3 of the
Landscape Ordinance No.544.
1C)a-T
City of Southlake, Texas
D.. Provide the required amount of landscape parking islands. A minimum of 10 s.f per parking
space must be provided in landscape parking islands (approximately 1 - 9' x 18' island per 16
spaces). Landscape parking islands are credited toward the required landscape area.
5. The minimum driveway throat depth required for traffic stacking is 75'. The applicant has provided
a driveway throat depth of 55'f for the north driveway intersecting Byron Nelson Parkway.
6. The following changes are needed with regard to the Site Data Summary:
A. Add the following items:
Area of Outside Storage
Percentage of Outside Storage
Start Construction Estimated Month/Year
Finish Construction Estimated Month/Year
Number of Stories
Maximum Bldg. Height
Floor Area By Use (number of classrooms and/or teaching stations, seating capacity of
auditorium, cafeteria etc.)
Provided Parking
Standard
Parallel
Handicap
Total
Required Loading Spaces
Provided Loading Spaces
B. Correct the following items:
Required. Parking - should be calculated at 1 space per classroom and/or teaching station,
plus 1 space per 4 seats in any cafeterias, gymnasiums, auditoriums; etc. Based on construction
plans received by the City it appears that the required number of parking spaces is 160.
Provided Parking - Correct the discrepancy between the provided parking shown in the site
data summary and the actual parking shown on the graphic. It appears that 157 parking spaces,
have been shown on the graphic. The provided parking must meet or exceed the minimum
requirements.
Percentage of site coverage - percentage of lot area covered by the building footprint which
appears to be 10%.
Area of Open Space - area unencumbered by buildings and pavement.
Percentage Open Space percentage of gross area unencumbered by buildings and pavement.
7. Label all entrances and exits to buildings.
R. Provide dimension from property lines to the closet points of the building.
Identify the cross hatched areas shown.
/015A
City of Southlake, Texas
10. Show the location, orientation, type and height of any intended lighting, signs, and exterior auditory.
11. The trash dumpster must be fiilly screened of view by a minimum 6' screening device meeting the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 39.
12. Show, label, and dimension all fire lines. Include all curb radii dimensions adjacent to the fire lane.
13. Staff recommends that the site grading and utilities be provided on a separate sheet in order to improve
readability of the site plan.
14. Provide a sidewalk accessing the intended crosswalk crossing Byron Nelson Parkway at Street `A'
accessing the proposed municipal site.
15. Reconfigure the sidewalk in front of the site to comply with the approved City Trail System Plan.
Consult with Kim Mc Adams at (817) 481-5581 Extension 757.
16. All non-residential uses abutting residential lots or dwellings must be screened of view by a minimum
Thigh screening device meeting the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sections 33.2,
33.3, and 39. This would appear to affect the intermediate north and east property lines and the south
property line of the site. Show and label the type of intended screening.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan; landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
' building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* A fire access roadway meeting the all weather surface requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No-480
and the Fire Department requirements must be in place prior to construction.
* This review is based on the "CS" Zoning District according to the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as
amended.
* Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-86" in the lower
right comer for ease of reference.
* The applicant should be aware that any new submittals if mg for the next scheduled meeting must
be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 9/9/96. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and
an 11 "x 17" revised reduction must be provided.
* Denotes Informational Comment
att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart showing the required bufferyards and plantings.
cc: Carroll Independent School District
J Cheatham & Associates
LAWRFILFMEV M96-086SPI
l ob t o
:4
SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS
Location Length
Bufferyard
Width - Type
Canopy
Trees
Accent
Trees
Shrubs
Fence / Screening
Height & Material
North -
Required
47V
5' - A
5
10
38
none
Provided*
East-
Required
26T
10' - C
8
11
32
8' Screening
Provided*
North
Required
496'
10' - C
15
20
60
8' Screening
Provided*
East
Required
297'
10' - B
6
9
30
none
Provided*
South -
Required
1412'
10' - B
28
42
141
8' Screening
Provided*
West -
Required
677'
none
0
0
0
none
Provided*
*Note any credits used in calculations:
a.
b.
C.
Other Comments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
10fril
Two n
e " o
t
z
pilly.
V i R
S 00*2255" £ — "6.78 1 S 00'25 OS E 207.50
Itu
1 AN din
1 �� `♦ j �`� I l h 1
m
' I
lot
1
I1
obi
r P
Go
Pm 1z
.3737,7371 fill
bill
y OO b * I I •-
f 0 N
_
y a
%A4.
10
z RECp AUG 281996