The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-02-05 CC Packetvray vi wuu nur. cnuo M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting February 5, 1991 ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Agenda Item No. 6. Resolution 91-07. D.A.R.E. Program. The resolution affirms the City's support for our D.A.R.E. program, and authorizes our participation in the NETCO DARE program. The City and CISD will still retain control of our program, but the grant if approved will fund the majority of our program costs. The grant program will enhance the DARE program concept in the three communities and provide for cost sharing. 2. Agenda Item No. 7. Resolution 91-08 Supporting the proposed improvements to SH114 in Southlake. The resolution expresses City Council support for the SH114 improvements, but request that the State reconsider its proposed design at White Chapel Boulevard. As designed, to exit eastbound on SH114 to White Chapel, the motorist must exit at Dove and take the access road to White Chapel. We have requested they look at an eastbound off -ramp between Dove and White Chapel. 3. Agenda Item No. 8. Resolution 91-09. Use of Credit Cards for payment for City Charges. We believe that the use of credit cards for payment of City charges would provide a convenient service to our citizens. Although the authority to use credit cards has been on the books for several years, apparently few cities have done so. An excerpt from the November newsletter from the Comptroller's office, included in your packet, gives an overview of what is involved. Our research indicates that Grapevine, North Richland Hills, Arlington, and Fort Worth provide this service in our area for some charges. The state statutes requires governing body approval before credit cards can be used. The Resolution 91-09 would specifically authorize credit card use for all City charges. The resolution is worded such that we must first solicit proposals for the service. There are a number of institutions that may have interest. After we solicit proposals, we will come back to City Council with a service contract for your consideration. We will be looking at a number of factors, including the fee to the customer for processing the payment and the program cost to the City. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council February 1, 1991 Page 2 4. Agenda Item No. 9. Additional City Hall Renovations. Given the results of the bond proposals, it becomes imperative that we look closely at more effective utilization of this building. The additional cost, over and above the remainder of the contract obligation funds, would come from the funds set aside in the budget for infrastructure improvements. Note: To reference these funds, see page 7 and page 90 in the current budget. We set aside $376,288 for the infrastructure improvements. We designated $122,907 toward identified projects (our share of CPE project; a portion of the White Chapel bridge). The balance of $253,381 is intended for use toward projects that are identified during the year, at City Council discretion. 5. Agenda Item No. 11B. Vernie Henderson will appear to explain the Lone Star Gas plans for service improvements in Southlake. 6. Agenda Item No. 19. SouthView Median Revisions. This will be a convoluted issue. The last word we have from the Postal Service is, since Carroll will be a potential boulevard street, they need access to SouthView. 7. Agenda Item No. 21. Monticello Developer's Agreement. Note the requirement for a performance bond in section IC of the agreement (pg. 21-6 of agenda packet). There is a possibility that the developer may request that this provision be removed. Attached hereto is a letter from Wayne Olson pointing out our concerns legally. There is no case law on this matter, but the risk is apparent. 8. Agenda Item No. 25. Contract with County for Street Reconstruction. Note that Mike Barnes, Public Works Director, has suggested that we might want to consider adding additional base material to the projects. This would perhaps reduce the deterioration problems we experienced with South Carroll and North Kimball. Should you decide to authorize the additional base, the funds would be taken from the infrastructure reserve discussed in item 4 (Agenda Item No. 9) above. 9. Agenda Item No. 29. Land Acquisition. We need to consider the Johnson Road site this meeting. As mentioned previously, we have the money to purchase the land should you so decide. We will have a handout to explain the funding possibility. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council February 1, 1991 Page 3 10. Agenda Item No. 32. Amendment to Colleyville Southlake Interim Wastewater Service Agreement. Although I object somewhat to the wording of the "whereases" the substance of the amendment is appropriate. There is not enough flow to meter, and will not be until some time later. We should be receiving a refund of approximately $18-19,000 of the $20,000 we escrowed with Colleyville. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST Attached for your review are: Memo from DPS Campbell concerning an incident involving our police and an attempted suicide in our jail. Letter from Attorney General's office in response to our request reference the records of our settlement with Jerry Crowder. The records are sealed. - Letter from attorney reference dismissal of lawsuit in Andert case (Kimball Road Drug Raid). - Letters to residents in Continental Park Estates concerning completion of project. Letter from Sean Randall concerning Arvida S-4 reimbursement. The ordinance (pp. 11-12 are attached hereto) provides that the developer may request and the City may compensate through reimbursement of up to 50% of developer fees. I told Sean two weeks ago that I would take the request to City Council, but that it would probably be the second meeting in February. It will. My recommendation to you will be to not reimburse any fees at this time, since we budget fees to pay for engineering, planning, etc., and other direct costs. Memo from Greg Last concerning research on existing zoning. - Agenda for February 26, 1991 meeting with Colleyville, Keller, and Southlake. FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Jan 31,91 16:11 No.012 P.02 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas Avenue 76092 January 31, 1991 Re: Construction of Streets by Developers Dear Curtis: Pursuant to your request, the following is an explanation of the statutory provisions which govern payment and performance bonds for construction of public improvements. Article 51.60, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., provides that "any person or persons, firm or corporation . . . entering into a formal contract in excess of $25 000.00 with any unicinality . for the construction, a tera on or repa ri of any public building or the prosecution or completion of any public work, shall be required before commencing such work to execute . . ." a payment and performance bond. Under the statute, the performance bond must be in the amount of the contract and is conditioned upon the faithful performance of the work in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents. The purpose of the bond is to protect the City in the event that construction is not completed in accordance with these documents. The payment bond must be executed in the amount of the contract and is for the protection of the claimants (subcontractors) supplying labor and material to the prime contractor. If a subcontractor who has furnished labor or materials is not properly paid by the prime contractor, he has the right under the bond to sue the principal and the sureties for payment of the amounts owed to him. Article 5160 further provides that the City may not require a bond if the contract is less than $25,000.00. However, on all contracts which are greater than $25,000.00, if the City does not require a payment bond, it is subject to the same liability as that of a surety who had issued a valid bond and all subcontractors are entitled to a lien on any funds which are owing to the developer or prime contractor. Mr. Curtis Hawk January 31, 1991 Page 2 The competitive bid statute (Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code) further sets forth specific requirements for the execution of a performance bond. Under Chapter 252, the City of Southlake may not enter into a contract that requires an expenditure of more than $51000.00 unless it has taken competitive bids. Section 252.044 provides that if the contract is for the construction of public works, the bidder to whom the contract is awarded must execute a good and sufficient performance bond in accordance with Article 5160. This section thereafter provides that if the contract is for less than $100,000.00, a performance bond is not required tthe contractor until the contract itheally workisides that completed payment is not d o and is accepted by the City. As a matter of reference, I would also like to mention the provisions of Section 212.071, it. sea. of the Local Government Code which apply to the construction of public improvements related to the development of subdivisions or land in cities with a population of 50,000 or more. Section 212.073 requires that the le developer constructe a ion ofance bond in accordance with improvements to ensure completion of 5160 for thea conconof the project. It is arguable that Article 5160 and Chapter 252 of the Local Government Code are not applicable to the construction of streets and other public infrastructure pursuant to a developer's agreement because there is no expenditure of public funds by the City. Further, I have heard arguments from developers that the construction of street improvements should not be considered the construction of public works because the dedication of the road is not final until acceptance of the improvements by the City. In my opinion, the intent of Article 5160 is to apply to the construction of streets that have been dedicated on a plat, even though acceptance of the streets has not taken place. I also question whether the intent of Article 5160 was not to require the execution of the two requisite bonds whenever any improvements are constructed pursuant to a developer participation contract. However, even if Article 5160 is not applicable, the City and performance is not in my opinion prohibited from requiring a payment bond which meets the terms of Article 5160. The City should consider the possible consequences if the City did not require a payment and performance bond under the guise that the improvements were private improvements. The City,s only option if the streets were not constructed in accordance with the contract and if the subcontractors were not paid, would be to not accept the improvements and to allow the subcontractors to attach a lien on the "private property." This may not be in the best interest of the City. FIELDING, BARRETT TEL: 817-560-3953 Jan 31,91 16:11 No.012 P.04 Mr. Curtis Hawk January 31, 1991 Page 3 Allen Taylor will evening ladifeydiscuss ave this with any questions and the council on Tuesday meantime, please let me know. very truly yours, Wayne K. Olson WKO/kt slake\ltrwko.36 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Violent Domestic Disturbance - 2160 E. Highland --------------------------------------------------------------- On February 1, 1991 at approximately 0406 hours, Cpl. R.C. Moore and Officer R. Wyrick were dispatched to 2160 E. Highland regarding a man chocking a woman. The officers arrived at approximately 0409 hours and found a w/m sitting behind the wheel of a pickup truck in the yard. When Cpl. Moore approached, the pickup started forward, striking Officer Wyrick and Officer Wyrick's police car. The subject drove through the yard and out onto East Highland Drive. Officer Wyrick went to the house to check on the family members inside the residence and Cpl. Moore requested assistance from Grapevine Police Department while pursuing the pickup truck. The pickup continued up North Kimball and drove up across the southbound lane through the ditch and across public property to circle back to his residence. Cpl. Moore continued pursuit, while a marked Grapevine unit had arrived on the property. It had been reported that the suspect was extremely intoxicated and violent. The pickup stopped in front of the house, Cpl. Moore and Grapevine Patrol Sgt. M. Moore approached the vehicle. The suspect rolled the driver's window down approximately 3 inches and verbally refused to exit the vehicle stating, "I'm not going to jail, I will kill that officer first." The suspect had the doors locked on the vehicle and again began to drive off utilizing his vehicle as a weapon against the officers. Several attempts were made to run the officers down with the officers taking evasive action to avoid being struck. The suspect's wife was screaming from the front of the residence, "don't run over those policemen, don't kill those officers." The suspect rammed the Grapevine Police unit and backed his vehicle towards the officers who were on foot. The suspect drove his vehicle to where Cpl. Moore was standing and demanded to speak to her. Cpl. Moore again ordered the suspect out of his vehicle and again told him he was under arrest. The suspect still had the window rolled down approximately 3 inches and kept asking Cpl. Moore to move closer to the window Memorandum - Curtis E. Hawk Violent Domestic Disturbance - 2160 E. Highland February 1, 1991 Page 2 so he could speak to her alone. Cpl. Moore noticed the suspect had something in his right hand, keeping it down toward the floor. After the suspect was arrest, it was discovered to be a hatchet. The suspect told officers they were going to have to shoot him because he was going to run down and kill that officer, pointing to Officer Wyrick. The suspect was in the process of driving off again and at that time, Cpl. Moore disabled the vehicle by shooting the tire out. At this time the suspect was extricated from the vehicle, handcuffed and placed under control. Officer Wyrick received medical treatment at Baylor Medical Center. The suspect was transported to Southlake Police Department and booked. I was at the scene at approximately 5:00 a.m. where all activities were proceeding along police procedural guidelines. While in the jail, the suspect tried to commit suicide. Due to our audio equipment for the jail, the dispatcher notified Cpl. Moore that she suspected abnormal activity in the jail. At that time, the suspect was removed from his homemade noose and transported to John Peter Smith for observation and incarceration. 6 BC/mr �,?,*1 Ey C •,e` Tex as: JAN MORALES ATTORNEY GENERAL Office of tjettornep general *WC of Texas January 23, 1991 JAN 2 8 1991 OFFICE OF CITY Mr. Curtis E. Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 OR91-046 Dear Mr. Hawk: You ask whether a settlement agreement between the city of Southlake and the former chief of police is subject to required public disclosure under the Texas Open Records Act, article 6252-17a, V.T.C.S., where a federal district has ordered that the settlement agreement be made confidential. Your request was assigned ID# 11285. Because of that order, the city may not make the settlement agreement available. V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17a, §§ 3(a)(1), 3(a)(7); Open Records Decision No. 415 (1984). Because case law and prior published open records decisions resolve your request, we are resolving this matter with this informal letter ruling rather than with a published open records decision. If you have questions about this ruling, please refer to OR91-046. Yours very truly, Sarah Woelk Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee SW/le Ref.: ID# 11285 cc: Julie Herrick Reporter The Grapevine Sun P.O. Box 400 Grapevine, Texas 76051 512/463-2100 P.O. BOX 12548 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 J1 08:49 GRAPEVINE POLICE DEPT. P. 02 PAUL V. ENRIQUEZ GARY F. LACKEY AttorAfyl At Law 1201 \jail, Street Suite 1.100 Dallas, Texax 75202 (214) i 48-1693 FAX (214) 4S-3195 January 25, 1991 Mr. Dan Hambrick The City of Grapevine P.O. Box 729 Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Cause No. CA-4-89-642-K Charlene Leath$=An, et al. ve. Tarrant countY Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, at al. (City of Grapevine, Texas) our Ref. Ng, 55S KA 23912 Dear Mr. Hambrick: Judge John McSryde has rendered a Final Judgment in the civil rights violation case filed by Gerald Andext, at al. for an occurrence on January 30, 1989 in the City of Southlake. The Final judgment including d smisseS the Cityall claims of of Grapevine. Copiefs ofathet all defendants, FinalJudgment, inc g Memorandum Opinion and Order are enclosed. The plaintiffs have ten days to seek a new trial and commence the appeal. You will be kept advised of this process. If you have any questions, please t me know. Si ce ely, Paul V. Enrique PVE/dkc Enclosures cc: Captain Dale Wilkins (w/encls.) Grapevine Police Ms. Michelle King (w/o encls.) ITT Hartford t Arvida Company January 8, 1991 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: As you know, Arvida is very concerned about mechanism for the approximately $485,000 Arvida S-4 sewer line. Ordinance 1493 which was passed addressed in Article V a method of compensating the oversizing costs for the construction of line. To date, Arvida has paid the City of $94,000 in inspection and filing fees. Please summary and canceled checks. TEXAS/MIDWEST DMSION 15303 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 350 DALLAS, TEXAS 75248-4645 TELEPHONE: (214) 980.5075 11 • the reimbursement has spent on the on January 2, 1990 the Developer for an off -site sewer Southlake nearly see the attached Per the ordinance, we are requesting a full 50% credit on all fees paid after January 2, 1990. This total would equal $14,439.52 and we would ask that the check be made out to "Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P.-II" as soon as possible. Obviously, on all future fees Arvida would like to take a 50% credit until the oversizing costs have been fully recovered. The ordinance allows for Developers to transfer these credits to future projects. Specifically, we are unsure whether the ordinance would allow Arvida to obtain credits for fees prior to January 2, 1990. However, we would appreciate any favorable consideration which the city might offer as a 50% credit for fees prior to January 2 would be worth $32,480.36 to Arvida. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Best Regards, Sean G. Randall Vice President Texas/Midwest Division cc: Bruce Smith Jeff Gaskins set forth in Article V, below. At no time shall the Developer be entitled to receive reimbursement for a sum greater than the I initial cost of the line less the pro rata share of capacity of that line that would have been attributable to the initial Developer for his consumption of capacity in the system. ARTICLE V aversizing• A. The Director of Public Works of the City of Southlake may require a Developer to install an interceptor line larger than that necessary to support his or her specific development. In the event that the Director of Public Works requires the installation of an interceptor line larger than required to serve the development, then the Developer installing the interceptor line will be reimbursed by the City of Southlake for the difference in cost between the size of the line required by the Director of Public Works and an eight (8) inch line or the size of the line required to serve the development, whichever is greater. The City will have five (5) years to pay the Developer for the difference in cost for the oversizing requirement. The City may compensate the Developer for the difference in cost mandated by oversizing through the process of allowing the Developer credits of up to fifty (50) percent of all development fees charged against any portion or phase of the development requiring the construction of the interceptor. Upon written request of the Developer, credit for development fees may be transferred from the current development project to subsequent development projects, subdivisions or phases undertaken by the Developer. Any balance remaining due and owing -11- from the City to the Developer for oversizing at the end of five years will be paid in full at that time by the City. SECTION IV CUMULATIVE PROVISION This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions or ordinances and or the code of the City of Southlake, Texas, as amended, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such Code, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such Code are hereby repealed. SECTION V. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE It is hereby declared to be the intention of'the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION VI. PENALTY PROVISION A. Fines: Any person, firm, corporation, agent or employee thereof who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof -12- Kq January 30, 1991 ^4 It 10�1,q , K-� Dear : The City's sewer line in neighborhood is complete. connect to the line. In you should first arrange cost (as outlined in the your plumbing contractor between the hours of 8:OC through Friday, and obtai sewer connection. There permit fee, but no tap fE assessed. the Continental Park Estates You will now be able to order to connect to the line, to pay your share of the line attachment), and either you or must come into the City Hall a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday n a plumbing permit for a will be a $30.00 plumbing es or impact fees will be The permanent street improvements which are scheduled in conjunction with the sewer installation will not be made until the weather improves, which possibly could take several months. Meanwhile, base material will be added and the streets will be graded in order to improve driving conditions until the streets can be paved. We appreciate your patience and tolerance with the temporary adverse conditions brought about by the sewer improvements. Sincerely, Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/kb attachment CONTINENTAL PARK ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER COST PAY OUT PROGRAM Formula For Determining Cost * Cost of project to benefited property owners - $194,000 : 70 lots in neighborhood = $2771 x .90 (amount that can be assessed under state law) = $2494 assessment cost. * Cost of project to be shared by benefited property owners who voluntarily participate with the City on a 75%-258 basis - $194,000 x .75 (property owner's share) - $145,500 : 70 lots in neighborhood = $2,078 voluntary participation cost. Pay Out Program Steps Step 1: Benefitted property owner pays City down payment of $1,079 and signs promissory note to pay remainder in three installments of $333 each, plus accrued interest of 10 percent, over the next 18 months. Step 2: After completing promissory note, property owner signs Mechanic's And Materialman's Contract to be filed as lien against property. Step 3: City will file lien and notice of assessment with County. Step 4: After $2,078 plus accrued interest is paid by property owners, note will be fulfilled and lien will become null and void. Note: The note and lien amounts will specify an amount of $2,494 which is the assessment amount mentioned above. However, both provide that upon payment of $2,078 (plus interest) the instrument will be considered paid in full. This is necessary because if the note is not paid the property will be assessed at the full assessment cost of $2,494 plus interest and legal fees. January 30, 1991 Dear : The City's sewer line in the Continental Park Estates neighborhood is complete. You will now be able to connect to the line. In order to connect either you or your plumbing contractor must come into the City Hall between -the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and obtain a plumbing permit for a sewer connection. There will be a $30.00 plumbing permit fee, but no tap fees or impact fees will be assessed. The permanent street improvements which are scheduled in conjunction with the sewer installation will not be made until the weather improves, which possibly could take several months. Meanwhile, base material will be added and the streets will be graded in order to improve driving conditions until the streets can be paved. Thank you for your participation in the project. The sewer and street improvements are a benefit to the individual property owners, the neighborhood, and the community at large. We appreciate your patience and tolerance with the temporary adverse conditions brought about by the sewer improvements. Sincerely, Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/kb City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, City Planner SUBJECT: Research on Existing Zoning in the City Enclosed please find two summaries of existing zoning districts and land uses currently existing in the City. As a part of our comprehensive planning efforts we compiled this data as a start on a City database which we can use in the future. I would like to forward this information to Council members and Planning and Zoning Commissioners for their review as well. If you or Council or Commissioners have recommendations for other research we can pursue when time allows, please let me know. 41 attachment LE, City of Southlake O1/01/91 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS Pg. 1 of 2 ZONING DISTRICT TOTAL PERCENTAGE ACRES OF CITY AG Agricultural 7,611 51.71% CS Community Service 202 1.37 RE Residential Estate (5 Acre) 80 0.54 SF-1 Single Family (1 Acre) 2,504 17.01 SF-30 S.F. (30,000 sq. ft.) 8 0.06 SF-20A S.F. (20,000 sq. ft.) 732 4.97 SF-20B S.F. (20,000 sq. ft.) 375 2.55 Mr-1 Two Family Residential 11 0.07 MF-2 Multiple Family 0 - 0-1 Office 77 0.52- 0-2 Office 0 - C-1 Neighborhood Commercial- 23 0.16 C-2 Local Retail 266 1.81 C-3 General Commercial 425 2.89 C-4 Arterial Mall 0 - B-1 Business Service Park 108 0.73 B-2 Commercial Manufacturing 12 0.08 I-1 Light Industrial 429 2.91 I-2 Heavy Industrial 106 0.72 HC Hotel 0 - MH Manufactured Housing 91 0.62 SP-1 Detailed Site Plan 59 0.40 SP-2 Generalized Site Plan 0 - PUD DEVELOPMENTS IBM PUD - C3.CS 380 2.58 PUD No. 1 - Mobil 822 5.59 PUD No. 2 - Timberlake 244 1.66 PUD No. 3 - Stone Lakes 155 1.05 PUD Total 1,601 10.88 TOTAL ACRES IN CITY 14,720 100.0 CITY OF SOUTHLARE SUMMARY OF ZONING DISTRICTS BY GENERAL LAND USE 01/01/91 Pg. 2 of 2 PERCENTAGE GENERAL LAND USE TOTAL ACRES OF CITY Agricultural: 7,611.00 51.71 Single -Family Residential: Includes RE, SF-11 SF-20A, SF-20B, 5,011.00 34.04 SF-30, P.U.D. No. 11 2, 3, MH Multi -Family Residential: Includes MF-1, MF-2 11.00 0.07 Public Use: Includes CS other than Parks 240.00 1.63 Park Land: Includes existing park land 16.00 0.11 Office: Includes 0-1, 0-2 77.00 0.52 Commercial: Includes C-1, C72, C-3, C-41 1,217.00 8.27 B-1, B-21 IBM PUD Industrial: Includes I-1, I-2 537.00 3.65 Note: The S-P-1 and S-P-2 districts are included in these summaries under the closest category of zoning. IM AGENDA COLLEYVILLE, KELLER, SOUTHLARE JOINT MEETING February 26, 1991 Harvey Hotel DFW I. Assembly 6:00 II. Dinner 6:30 III. Discussion 8:00 A. Joint Fire Station B. Storm Drainage . C. Police and Fire Dispatching D. Parks and Beautification E. Utilities 1. Water Supply 2. Coordination of Improvements F. Other IV. Adjournment 9:30 City of Southlake, Texas - MEMORANDUM February 5, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk,, City Manager FROM: LouAnn Heath o& SUBJECT: Budget Fund Balance The preliminary audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1990 have been presented to the Finance Office for review. The General Fund undesignated Fund Balance at September 30, 1990 is $ 940,097, an increase of $ 666,494 over last year's total Fund Balance of $273,603. In the 1990-91 Budget document, the fund balance had been estimated to be $ 639,662, with $ 370,000 reserved for infrastructure, leaving $269,662 undesignated. The difference between the audited and the budget's estimated fund balance is $ 3001,435. ($ 940,087 - $ 639,662) During 1989, the City experienced substantial revenue growth in license and permit fees. The 1989-90 budget revision increased these anticipated revenues from $ 152,130 to $ 313,062. The actual revenues for the year were $ 435,338, or $ 122,276 in excess of the revised budget. LAH/lc City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICRES AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution 91-04, Calling General Election Resolution 91-04, in your packets, calling the General Election for May 4, 1991 also establishes dates for absentee voting, time frames for placing names on the ballot, names the election Judge and Alternate Judge, terms of office, and etc. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. h4jjj 'CA ^ 4 - LL s City of Southlake, Texas Im RESOLUTION NO.91-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CALLING A GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 1991. ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCTS WITHIN THE CITY; APPOINTING AN ELECTION JUDGE AND AN ALTER- NATE JUDGE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAK SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMEN FOR PRE -CLEARANCE APPROVAL; ESTABLISHING OTHER PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION; ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR CAN V SSING RETURNS; AN PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, c on Code (the "Code") specifies that the first S urday in May shall be a "uniform electioW�t e" and that a ge era election of a city may be held on such ; id, WHEREAS, by a Resolu on I rst Saturday in May (May 4, 1991) has been adopted as t its general election; and, WHEREAS, by this resolutioablished the last Saturday in May (May 25, 1991) as the data runoff election should one be required for the general eland, WHEREAS, by this resolution it is the intention of the City Council to officially establish the elec 'on precincts within the City, to designate a polling ace for t e election, to appoint the necessary election office s and to es ablish and set forth procedures for conducting the a ection; and, WHEREAS, the changes f om prior pract es may require pre -clearances under the Feder 1 Voting Rights Ac NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Election Dal. A general election sha be held in the City of Southlake, T xas, Saturday, May 4, 1991, ,which the following officers will Oe elected: MAYOR COUNCILM MBER PLACE NO. 1 COUNCILM MBER PLACE NO. 2 COUNCILM MBER PLACE NO. 6 JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT Section 2. Term of Office. In accordance*with the City's Charter, the candid— e fo each office receiving a majority of votes for such office sha 1 be elected for a term of two (2) or three (3) years beginning May 4, 1991, or until a successor is duly elected and qualified Uity ui 5outnlake, I exas Resolution 91-04 Calling the General Election page two .Section 3. Eligibility for Candidacy. In accordance with the City's Charter, no person shall be eligible for the office of Mayor or Councilmember unless he/she is a qualified elector of the City and has resided in the City for at least twelve (12) months next preceding the election at which he/she is to be elected. Section 4. Application for a Place on the Ballot. In accordance with Section 143.007 of the Code, any eligible and qualified person may have his name printed upon the official ballot as a candidate for the offices herein set forth by filing his sworn application with the City Secretary not earlier than February 18, 1991, and not later than 5:00 p.m. March 20, 1991. Each such application shall be on a form as prescribed by Section 141.031 of the Code. The order in which the names of the candidates are to be printed on the ballot shall be determined by a drawing by the City Secretary as provided by Section 52.094 of the Code. Notice of the time and place for such drawing shall be given in accordance with the Code. Section 5. Runoff Election. In accordance with the Code, in the event that no candidate received a majority of the votes for an office, there shall be a runoff election held on May 25, 1991. If a runoff election is necessary, it shall be ordered by the Mayor not later than five (5) days after the canvassing of the returns of the general election. Section 6. Election Precincts. In accordance with Section 42.061 of the Code, the City Council of the City hereby establishes its election precincts for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution, such precincts to be coterminous with the boundaries of the below listed election precincts established by the Denton County and Tarrant County Commissioner's Courts, to the extent such election precincts are within the corporate boundaries of the City, and to be identified by the same number as the county precincts. The election precincts hereby adopted as the election precincts of the City are as follows: Denton County Election Precinct No. 312 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3035 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3039 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3040 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3114 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3286 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3359 Section 7. Polling Place. The polling place for all election precincts of the City for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution shall be City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. The polls . ,7, City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page three shall be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., in accordance with and pursuant to the requirements of the Code. Section 8. Appointment of Election Judge and Alternate Election Judge. The following named individuals, residing at the respective addresses, are hereby appointed to serve as Presiding Election Judge and Alternate Presiding Election Judge, respectively, at the election: Presiding Judge: Name: Aloha Payne Address: 1213 Whispering Lane, Southlake, Texas Alternate Presiding Judge: Name: Sue Eubanks Address: 2711 Rolling Lane, Southlake, Texas The Election Judge and the Alternate Judge shall be qualified voters of the city. The City Secretary shall, in accordance with Section 32.009 of the Code, deliver to the Presiding Judge and the Alternate Judge notice of their appointments not later than twenty (20) days from the effective date of this Resolution. Section 9. Appointment of Clerks. The Presiding Judge for the polling place shall appoint Election Clerks and as many additional Clerks as are necessary for the proper conduct of the election. Provided, however, five (5) Clerks, shall be the maximum number of Clerks which may be appointed to serve at the polling place. All Election Clerks shall be qualified voters of the City. Section 10. Compensation of the Election Judge and Election Clerks. The Presiding Election Judge, Alternate Presiding Judge and each Election Clerk shall be compensated at the rate of $5.00 per hour in accordance with Section 32.091 of the Code. The Presiding Election Judge shall also be paid the additional sum of $25.00 for delivering the returns of the election. Section 11. Method of Voting. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and instructed to provide and furnish all necessary election supplies to conduct the election. In accordance with this resolution. Voting at the election shall be by electronic voting machine and shall be conducted in accordance with the code. t..iry w oommaKe, i exas IN Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page four Section 12: Governing Law and Qualified Voters. The election shall be held in accordance with the Constitu�on of the State of Texas and the Code, and all resident qualified voters of the City shall be eligible to vote at the election. Section 13. Publication and Posting of Notice. Notice of the election shall be published once no earlier than April 4, 1991, and no later than April 24, 1991, in a newspaper in accordance with the provisions of the Code, and shall be posted no later than April 13, 1991, in the regular place for posting notice of meetings of the City Council of the City. Section 14. Absentee Voting. Absentee Voting by personal appearance shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on each day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or an official State Holiday, beginning on April 15, 1991, and continuing through April 30, 1991, except on Saturday, April 27, 1991, the absentee polling place will be open from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Absentee voting by personal appearance shall be at the office of the City Secretary, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. Applications for absentee voting by mail shall be delivered to the City Secretary at the same .address not earlier than March 5, 1991 and not later than the close of business on April 26, 1991. Absentee voting, both by personal appearance and by mail, shall be by paper ballots and shall be canvassed by the Absentee Ballot Board, which is hereby created. The Presiding Election Judge and the Alternate Presiding Judge appointed herein shall serve as the presiding officer and the alternate presiding officer, respectively, of the Absentee Ballot Board. The other election officer serving at the election shall serve as the other members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the election. Section 15. Submissions to the United States Justice Department. That the City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to make such submissions as are necessary to the United States Justice Department to seek pre -clearance approval for new precincts added due to recent annexations and for additional length of the absentee voting period to include Saturday, April 27, 1991, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 6 r airy of boutniaKe, i exas Im Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page five Section 16. Delivery of Returns. In accordance with the Code, immediately after the closing of the polls on the day of the election, the election officers names in this Resolution shall make and deliver the returns of the election in triplicate as follows: one copy shall be retained by the Presiding Judge, one copy shall be delivered to the Mayor of the City, and one copy of the returns, together with the ballot boxes and all election supplied, shall be delivered to the City Secretary. All election records and supplied shall be preserved by the City Secretary in accordance with the Code. Section 17. Canvassing of Returns. The City Council shall convene on May 7, 1991, at 7:00 p.m., to canvass the returns of the election. Section 18. Necessary Actions. The Mayor and the City Secretary of the City, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code in carrying out and conducting the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein. Section 19. Effective Date. effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas This Resolution shall be day of , CITY OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor k City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.91-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CALLING A GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 1991. ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCTS WITHIN THE CITY; APPOINTING AN ELECTION JUDGE AND AN ALTER- NATE JUDGE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR PRE -CLEARANCE APPROVAL; ESTABLISHING OTHER PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION; ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR CANVASSING RETURNS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 41.001 of the Texas Election Code (the "Code") specifies that the first Saturday in May shall be a "uniform election date" and that a general election of a city may be held on such day; and, WHEREAS, by a Resolution the first Saturday in May (May 4, 1991) has been adopted as the date ofits general election; and, WHEREAS, by this resolution, established the last Saturday in May (May 25, 1991) as the date for a runoff election should one be required for the general election; and, WHEREAS, by this resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to officially establish the election precincts within the City, to designate a polling place for the election, to appoint the necessary election officers and to establish and set forth procedures for conducting the election; and, WHEREAS, the changes from prior practices may require pre -clearances under the Federal Voting Rights Act: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Election Day. A general election shall be held in the City of Southlake, Texas, Saturday, May 4, 1991, at which the following officers will be elected: MAYOR COUNCILMEMBER PLACE NO. 1 COUNCILMEMBER PLACE NO. 2 COUNCILMEMBER PLACE NO. 6 JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT Section 2. Term of Office. In accordance with the City's Charter, the candidate for each of the following offices receiving a majority of votes for such office shall be elected for the following terms, beginning May 4, 1991, or until a successor is duly elected and qualified: Mayor: Three (3) years; Councilmember Place No. 1 Two (2) years; Councilmember Place No. 2 Three (3) years; Councilmember Place 6 Two (2) years; Judge of Municipal Court Two (2) years A City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-04 Calling the General Election page two Section 3. Eligibility for Candidacy. In accordance with the City's Charter, no person shall be eligible for the office of Mayor or Councilmember unless he/she is a qualified elector of the City and has resided in the City for at least twelve (12) months next preceding the election at which he/she is to be elected. In accordance with City ordinance NO. 522, no person shall be eligible for the Office of Judge of the Municipal Court unless he/she is a licenses attorney in good standing and resides within the City of Southlake or a contiguous City. Section 4. Application for a Place on the Ballot. In accordance with Section 143.007 of the Code, any eligible and qualified person may have his name printed upon the official ballot as a candidate for the offices herein set forth by filing his sworn application with the City Secretary not earlier than February 18, 1991, and not later than 5:00 p.m. March 20, 1991. Each such application shall be on a form as prescribed by Section 141.031 of the Code. The order in which the names of the candidates are to be printed on the ballot shall be determined by a drawing by the City Secretary as provided by Section 52.094 of the Code. Notice of the time and place for such drawing shall be given in accordance with the Code. Section 5. Runoff Election. In accordance with the Code, in the event that no candidate received a majority of the votes for an office, there shall be a runoff election held on May 25, 1991. If a runoff election is necessary, it shall be ordered by the Mayor not later than five (5) days after the canvassing of the returns of the general election. Section 6. Election Precincts. In accordance with Section 42.061 of the Code, the City Council of the City hereby establishes its election precinct for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution, such precincts to be coterminous with the boundaries of the below listed election precincts established by the Denton County and Tarrant County Commissioner's Courts, to the extent such election precincts are within the corporate boundaries of the City: Denton County Election Precinct No. 312 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3035 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3039 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3040 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3114 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3286 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3359 Section 7. Polling Place. The polling place for the election precinct of the City for all municipal elections from and after the effective date of this Resolution shall be City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. The polls City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page three shall be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., in accordance with and pursuant to the requirements of the Code. Section 8. Appointment of Election Judge and Alternate Election Judge. The following named individuals, residing at the respective addresses, are hereby appointed to serve as Presiding Election Judge and Alternate Presiding Election Judge, respectively, at the election: Presiding Judge: Name: Aloha Payne Address: 1213 whispering Lane, Southlake, Texas Alternate Presiding Judge: Name: Sue Eubanks Address: 2711 Rolling Lane, Southlake, Texas The Election Judge and the Alternate Judge shall be qualified voters of the city. The City Secretary shall, in accordance with Section 32.009 of the Code, deliver to the Presiding Judge and the Alternate Judge notice of their appointments not later than twenty (20) days from the effective date of this Resolution. Section 9. Appointment of Clerks. The Presiding Judge for the polling place shall appoint Election Clerks and as many additional Clerks as are necessary for the proper conduct of the election. Provided, however, five (5) Clerks, shall be the maximum number of Clerks which may be appointed to serve at the polling place. All Election Clerks shall be qualified voters of the City. Section 10. Compensation of the Election Judge and Election Clerks. The Presiding Election Judge, Alternate Presiding Judge and each Election Clerk shall be compensated at the rate of $5.00 per hour in accordance with Section 32.091 of the Code. The Presiding Election Judge shall also be paid the additional sum of $25.00 for delivering the returns of the election. Section 11. Method of Voting. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and instructed to provide and furnish all necessary election supplies to conduct the election. In accordance with this resolution. Voting at the election shall be by electronic voting machine and shall be conducted in accordance with the code. City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page four Section 12. Governing Law and Qualified Voters. The election shall be held in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Texas and the Code, and all resident qualified voters of the City shall be eligible to vote at the election. Section 13. Publication and Posting of Notice. Notice of the election shall be published once no earlier than April 4, 1991, and no later than April 24, 1991, in a newspaper in accordance with the provisions of the Code, and shall be posted no later than April 13, 1991, in the regular place for posting notice of meetings of the City Council of the City. Section 14. Absentee Voting. ' Absentee Voting by personal appearance shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on each day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or an official State Holiday, beginning on April 15, 1991, and continuing through April 30, 1991, except on Saturday, April 27, 1991, the absentee polling place will be open from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Absentee voting by personal appearance shall be at the office of the City Secretary, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. Applications for absentee voting by mail shall be delivered to the City Secretary at the same address not earlier than March 5, 1991 and not later than the close of business on April 26, 1991. Absentee voting, both by personal appearance and by mail, shall be by paper ballots and shall be canvassed by the Absentee Ballot Board, which is hereby created. The Presiding Election Judge and the Alternate Presiding Election Judge appointed herein shall serve as the presiding officer and the alternate presiding officer, respectively, of the Absentee Ballot Board. The other election officer serving at the election shall serve as the other members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the election. Section 15. Submissions to the United States Justice Department. That the City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to make such submissions as are necessary to the United States Justice Department to seek pre -clearance approval for new precincts added due to recent annexations and for additional length of the absentee voting period to include Saturday, April 27, 1991, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. City of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-04 Calling General Election page five Section 16. Delivery of Returns. In accordance with the Code, immediately after the closing of the polls on the day of the election, the election officers names in this Resolution shall make and deliver the returns of the election in triplicate as follows: one copy shall be retained by the Presiding Judge, one copy shall be delivered to the Mayor of the City, and one copy of the returns, together with the ballot boxes and all election supplied, shall be delivered to the City Secretary. All election records and supplied shall be preserved by the City Secretary in accordance with the Code. Section 17. Canvassing of Returns. The City Council shall convene on May 7, 1991, at 7:00 p.m., to canvass the returns of the election. Section 18. Necessary Actions. The Mayor and the City Secretary of the City, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code in carrying out and conducting the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein. Section 19. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City. Attorney City of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Resolution for DARE Program --------------------------------------------------------------- Grapevine, Southlake and Colleyville have formed a grant pact to fund a multi -community DARE program. The basic concept of the grant is to provide service throughout these communities with grant funding, as opposed to the cities paying their officers individually. The City of Southlake and the Carroll Independent School District are currently funding this position. The grant monies would replace this funding and would also provide more ancillary benefits such as printing, equipment, etc. With grant funding, both the school and the City would be able to reduce their monetary input for five years by only having to fund a small portion of the individual's salary. First year grants will be 100 percent funded on salaries, and a combined total cost to the City and CISD will be approximately $16,000 for the first year. The city's contribution alone to DARE currently is $15,831 for salary, overtime, travel, etc. We would like the Council to pass the attached resolution showing support for DARE. This resolution would be included in the grant package. There is no need for committed resources at this time, with the understanding that upon grant approval, our first year funding will reduce current financial resources dramatically. Dr. Annette Griffin, Superintendent, Carroll Independent School District, fully supports this funding and has stated she will write a letter stating so. Her letter would also be included in the package. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. BC/mr Attachment City of Southlake, Texas �_'IM.SnT.1TTTOM Nn _ 91 - 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, IN SUPPORT OF THE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM FOR SOUTHLAKE. WHEREAS, lake does recognize and support the Southlake project D.A.R.E. program; and, WHEREAS, we as a city recognize that our children are our future, our legacy; and, WHEREAS, we, the City Council also recognize that illegal drugs could ruin that bright future; and, WHEREAS, we, the City Council know that the D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) teaches our children that the use of illegal drugs and the abuse of legal drugs is wrong. It also gives them practical ways of refusing the drug offer; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. That the City Council hereby supports this program because it teaches our children that values, self-confidence and self-worth are not found in a bottle or a pill, but in themselves. Section 3. That the City Council hereby authorizes the City of Southlake to participate in the Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. Program. Section 4. That this resolution is in effect upon passage by the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor 4! —401 a>`'t:'+:ii';:`•Si>i C>i i:i:r`.>?i.`` "4f:2f`'•%.. .`.a:�:;:•i'c:i_':.;-:.. OI GOmmiss:o8 APPLICATION SUMMARY y 1) Recipient City of Grapevine Police Department 2) Type of Application Submitted Youth Prevention/Intervention Adult Prevention/Intervention Youth Treatment Adult Treatment 3) Name of Proposed Program 4) When Proposed Program Was/Will be Fstabllshed AdNoasrtheast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. Program 307 W. Dallas Road October 1991 Month Year City Zip Grapevine, TX 76051 5) Program Contact Person 6) Staffing 8 8 Wayne Eichel Full -Time Part -Time Title Corporal Telephone Administrative 1 (817 )481-0324 Program Director 1 Address Clinical Director 307 W. Dallas Road Counselor City zip Caseworker Grapevine, TX 76051 Specialist 3 D.A.R.E Instruc or 8) Annual Organization Budget Contractual: Proposed Program ' $ 335,220.81 Other Programs TOTAL $ 335,220.81 7) TCADA Amount Requested $197 , 225.24 9) Target Population Race/Ethnici Percent Age Range American Indian 1 % Male Female Black 2% m anic 4% 6-17 6-17 White 92% Other 1$ Description: The target population is the student body of two school districts, the Grapevine Colleyville I.S.D. and the Southlake Carroll I.S.D. These students number .approximately 11,000 and represent the Future of the Nation. As such, this group is in critical need of Drug Awareness Education as they are our best chance to reduce the demand for illicit drugs. As a secondary target population, all citizens within the communities of Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville will be provided with Drug Awareness Information to help foster community support for the efforts.of the target group to remain drug free. 9/90 Instructions on Back Attachrne-n-FF Page 17 of 76 �- 3 717V 10) Summary of Program Narrative The cities of Grapevine, Colleyville, and Southlake border upon each other in the Northeastern section of Tarrant County. The three communities send children to school in two separate school districts, the Grapevine Colleyville I.S.D. and the Southlake Carroll Z.S.D. Both school districts and all three communities are charged wit the responsibility of combating drug usage among our students and citizens. The most effective method of reducing the effects of drugs on the structure of our society is to educate the populace about the effects and consequences of drug abuse and thereby reduce the demand for illicit drugs. To this end all the involved cities and educational groups have entered into project D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and are presented this program to it's school populations. However the close proximity of the boundarie and the fact that school districts boundaries are different from the city lines. It has become obvious that greater coordination between the D.A.R.E: projects is necessary. This Grant will fund the formation of Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. A multi -agency task force aimed at coordinating anti -drug education and focusing community attention on the Drug Abuse Resistance techniques as well coordinate the Drug Free Schools Enforcement initiative. This task force will provide adequate personnel to instruct D.A.R.E. classes throughout all grade levels and to coordinate parental and community involvement in the Drug Abuse Education process. The cities will provide personnel with the initial D.A.R.E. training to the program. These offices will have tri use of a vehicle supplied by each city. Much of the office equipment and supplies for the program will be provided by the participating agencies. The requested Grant monies will fund mainly instruction equipment, operational costs and personnel and related expenses. The success of this program will be measured by the community response to re- program and through the use of questionnaires, testing the students attitudes toward drug usage. These questionnaires will be administered prior to the students exposure to the program and then after culmination. Community attitudes will be measured through school district opinion polls. 11Wu LLl:uU11J Ull Dd(7C Attachment 1 Page 19 of 76 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2 CA T's APPLM CATION a• NUMBER 3. APPLE CATION IDENTI- 1. TYPE OF ~ SUBMISSION ❑ NOTICE OF INTENT (OPTIONAL) FDER FIER b. DATE (M�nt y ❑ PREAPPLICATION revs .w.tA 7 NOTE TO BE ASSIGNED f se ® APPLICATION 1990 12 31 BY STATE VC a NUMBER DATE ASSIGNED year swat* der 19 L.enr s. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) a Aooiwm Nan+. Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. 75-6000-546 a Ownmbon una Grapevine Police Department 6 a sv"vP.O. Bo: 307 W. Dallas Road PRO. a NUMBER ( • d C*' Grapevine a Conti Tarrant GRAM I- SIB* Texas 9. ZIP cod.. 76051 (Fmm C:FD4) MULTIPLE ❑ k canoe P'ar>a1 Me- Wayne Eichel, Corporal b. TITLE Tde/*oae Na) (817) 481-0324 7. TIME OF APPLICANTS PROJECT (Use waebon IV of 01is form to aovida a amnery dasalpbm, of 0» 6. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT = MINI) Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E., to provide "" �^^`•O� -+�.... W coordinated D.A.R.E. instruction and facilitate community ` T`;W support for the reduction of drug abuse through education Eir "'-0"' within the boundaries of two school districts and three `-'r'°""° {{j,.,� Ester eyrorerar (eQer ICa,J communities. 9. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT fNa-e a/dan cor ns macs es) 10. ESTIMATED NUMBER 11. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE OF PERSONS BENEFITING ax-0- a r E o- m Levi m. prisA! ',I{ 12. PROPOSED FUNDING 113. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 14. TYPE OF APPLICATION a APPLICANT b. PROJECT Senate #10 Senate #10 b.AMMANI 140 446 House #89,#92 House #89,#92 17.TWEOFCKMA GE(AwJ*er/4) ^-tier 00" aver apq&.t o. STATE/ 19 7 , 2 2 5 .00 1 s. PROJECT START 16. PROJECT 0-4um".e oar. LOCAL .00 DATE re., .eo.tA DURATION _ t�� P 19 90 10 Ol 12 1 OTHER 00I.16. DATE DUE TO Year swat* dar Tom I s 3 3 5, 2 2 0= FEDERAL AGENCY te. 19 19. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse a ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT t ADOgE55 720 Brazos St. Suite 403, Austin, Texas 78701 22. To 00 bast cif"lagwbdpa ano Doi I a YES. THIS NOTICE OF INTENT/PREAPPUCA /APPLICATION WAS W THE data in Olio p wWP`cabcoVappicaton EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROC;1199s FOR REVIEW ON: APPLICANT an Bus and ao eM"dmmi wnt has DATE December 31. 0 y CERTIFIES been duly a urwrasd by Ow gam 610 a THAT► body of Ow applicant and 01a *Whom* "=ffVtp ardl OM anadW a*K9W c" b. NO. PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372 ❑ it V* auatarloa is Wptoved• OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW ❑ E-air. Aa a -r- Lev 1 A &0W Asa. 20. EXISTING FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 21. REMARKS ADDED TO THE 23. a TYPED NAME AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE CERTIFYING REPRE- SENTATIVE 24. APPUGI- rave s.ost* dal 25. FEDERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION- NUMBER 26. FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION TION RECEIVED 19 27. ACTION TAKEN 121L FUNDING raw mmj* day 30. revs swan* due O a O rrcaoa) �&FFESE 29. ACTION DATE► 19 STARTING DATE 19 f114L S .00 O b. REJECTED REJECT O G RETURNED FOR 31. CONTACT FOR ADOITIONAL INFORMA- 32. roar .coal* A9:e AMENDMENT TION (Name end telephone number) ENDING b. APPLICJ1Nf O d. RETURNED FOR ,00 DATE 19 c ST ORAL .00 33. REMARKS ADDED EO.12372SUBMISSION Funding Processes Section d. LOCAL .00 BY APPLICANT TO (512) 867-8700 STATE a. OTHER .00 e. DEFERRED Pr' E WITHDRAWN Yaw ❑ No f. TOTAL s .00 NSN 7540-01-0004162 424-103 STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 1 (Rev. 4-ba) PREVIOUS EDITION Piwr&Owd * OMN Circular A-107 IS NOT USABLE Attachment 1 Page 21 of 7A_ C O R o rn C o 0 CO rl� C o 0 Co C Ln o 1 a 1 1 1 o, � r� o 0 0 0 in NCy LO o 1 1 1 1 w [O —tO Attachment 1 Page 26 of 76 .L City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth The program proposed in this R.F.P. shall be called the Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. Program. (N.E.T.C.O. DAA.RE.) BACKGROUND AND NEED In 1983 the City of Grapevine, Grapevine Police Department, and the Grapevine Col- leyville Independent School District (G.C.I.S.D.) recognized that the number of juveniles engaging in delinquent and/or criminal activities was steadily increasing. In an effort to combat this trend the agencies entered into an agreement that saw the for- mation of a School Resource Officer (S.R.O.). This project was staffed by a single officer whose responsibility was to act as a liaison between the school populations and the criminal justice system. This officer was suc- cessful in that incidents where law enforcement and school authorities overlapped were more effectively handled. The Police Department received positive input from the school population and the school populations were less leary of law enforcement. Criminal activities of all types were cleared in a more efficient manner resulting in a less volatile atmosphere on the campuses of the G.C.I.S.D. During the summer of 1987 the district and city became concerned with national studies which showed the age at which drug experimentation occurred dropping and began to explore methods for the S.R.O. to reach the younger students. In an effort to combat this problem a D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program was stated. This program, as developed by the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Unified School District, was designed to instruct students on life skills such as building self esteem, recognizing risk, assertive response skills, and other skills necessary to com- bat the temptation and peer pressures associated with drug experimentation. The initial pilot program was a success from an instructional point of view. Educators and parents remarked that the students involved in the program were demonstrating improved abilities to recognize the targeted risk factors and a more defined concept of self responsibility and control. The program, however was not without it's problems, most of which stemmed from the part time approach used in finding personnel for the instruction. The S.R.O. would frequently be called away from class for pressing mat- ters, such as a reported child abuse, missing elementary student, or disturbances on other campuses. While some interruption to the class schedule was anticipated the detrimental affect on students moral was higher than anticipated. Another, more unexpected, situation also arose, the City of Grapevine is served by two school districts: The G.C.I.S.D. and Carroll/Southlake I.S.D. (C.S.I.S.D.). During this first year C.S.I.S.D. did not offer a D.A.R.E. Program. This meant that a large segment of the Grapevine population was not receiving the D.A.R.E. curriculum. Originally it was thought that the two student groups remained isolated from each other, however, judging from the complaints Program Narrative /j 46ra` / City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth recieved from the parents of students not receiving D.A.R.E., the intermingling and in- formational exchange between the two student bodies was greater than originally an- ticipated. With the onset of the 1988-1989 school year agencies from both Grapevine and South - lake sought to remedy these problems. In Grapevine an additional officer was trained as a D.A.R.E. Instructor and assigned on a part-time basis to back up the S.R.O. program and project D.A.R.E. The City of Southlake and the C.S.I.S.D. entered into an agreement that provided for a S.R.O JD.A.R.E. Officer. The amount of students ex- posed to the D.A.R.E. curriculum nearly doubled. Again the parental, student, and community response to both projects was overwhelming. D.A.R.E. was now being received by students residing predominantly in two districts and three cities: Grapevine, Colleyville, and Southlake. After reviewing the programs in both districts the agencies found encouraging news in the reception of the D.A.R.E. programs and discouraging news in the program logistics. Both programs were finding it difficult to maintain regular instruction schedules due to the part-time nature of the officers assigned as classroom instructors. There was no logical way to reassign the "other assigned duties" of the D.A.R.E. officers because of existing staffing problems within the participating Police Agencies. This uncertainty in scheduling was proving to be disruptive in the classroom both to the students and to the classroom teacher. The D.A.R.E. program in its entirety is designed around the core course taught at the 5th and 6th grade level. However, the program functions best when administered throughout the children's school experience. This concept consist of "visitations" with the lower grades, each lasting about 5 sessions and follow-ups with the higher grades. Using the offices assigned to D.A.R.E. on a part-time basis the Grapevine Police Department and Southlake Police Department Officers were getting core curriculum taught but that was about it. The other major problem noted was in the area of coordinating community support. The area served by the two D.A.R.E. Programs is unique in that it is relatively compact and it's business and civic organization often share memberships. Therefore the two D.A.R.E. Programs often found themselves competing with each other for the support of these groups. The end result being both groups were supported but neither one fully. Coordinating events to help reinforce the classroom lessons got to be a major problem. Groups were either confused as to which program was benefiting the majority of its members. As the D.A.R.E. programs were identifying problems resulting from the lack of man- power to provide quality instruction to students and an inability to coordinate activities Program Narrative 2 V/ —g City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. AXE. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth within the adult population served continued. The two school districts posted nearly 10% annual growth rates. In essence what the agencies were faced with boiled down to this. A very effective program that addressed the issue of Drug Abuse from the demand side by instructing children on the workings of peer pressure and self esteem, helping them develop the life skills necessary to learn that success and happiness are available but do not come packaged in a bottle, plastic baggy, or syringe. A program that was very well received by all aspects of the community was gradually being robbed of its effectiveness because of manpower shortages, jurisdictional boundary problems and lack of coordination. The answer became obvious, a combined effort involving the personnel of all agencies responsible to the target populations providing for a concentrated effort to reduce drug abuse through education. From this concept came the request for funding before you now. The Northeast Tar- rant County D.A.R.E. Project. The concept is relatively simple. 'Together We Stand, Divided We Fall." GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals of N. E. T. CO. D.A.R.E. will be as follows: • Provide consistent D.A.R.E. instruction to students attending the Grapevine Colleyville ISD and the Carroll Southlake ISD • Coordinate effective community involvement in the D.A.R.E. Program • Increase parental involvement in D.A.R.E. activities • Design and instruct summer activities to continue and reinforce the D.A.R.E. education process PROGRAM DESIGN AND APPROACH The target population for this program is the general population of the participating school districts with a secondary target population identified as the parents of those students. Particular attention will be paid to those students who are identified as the high risk age group of 15-16 years of age. These students have been identified as most likely to be approached for first time usage of drugs and alcohol. Students within this age group will receive the 17 and 10 week care curriculum programs. The D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program was chosen as the method of providing information to the student body because it provided the most effective method to deal wit the problem as recognized by the respective school districts. The Program Narrative 3 6-F IN City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.PLE. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth GCISD recently participated in the Parents Resource Institute for Drug Education Sur- vey. This survey indicated a very low percentage of students involved in drug usage and ;a medium involvement in tobacco and alcohol use. The common denominator in all usages was the location of participation, 539 of the students who used beer, for example, used at a friends house or with friends at a park or other location. A majority of these students replied that they would have preferred to say no but couldn't figure out how to. These are exactly the life skills dealt with in the D.A.R.E. curriculum thus it was felt that our target group would benefit most from D.A.R.E. as apposed to more intensive intervention type programs. D.A.R.E. is an instruction. program dealing with life skills concepts, primarily in the areas of peer pressure resistance, self-esteem improvement, risk assessment, support group instruction and value decision such as respect for the rights of others, and per- sonal safety. D.A.R.E. strategies use techniques based in role playing, interpersonal communication skills and recognizing alternatives to drug usage within the confines of this program. D.A.R.E. instructions will be provided in these structure types. e The 17 week core curriculum - designed to be presented to the fifth and sixth grade age level. e The 10 week curriculum - aimed at the seventh and eighth grade student. e Visitations - Five week curriculum is tailored for the K-4 age groups. In order to meet the goals stated earlier N. E. T. CO. D.A.R.E. will be structured as a multi -agency task force designed to provide drug and alcohol abuse education centered on the D.A.R.E. curriculum and concepts. N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will combine the drug education efforts of six agencies as they pertain to the students housed within the schools; Grapevine Colleyville ISD and the Southlake Carroll ISD. In order to facilitate open communications and share the decision making process equally among agencies representing the effected population base, N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. activities will be overseen by a Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will consist will consist of the Chief of Police, or his designee from each of the cities engaged in this program, Colleyville, Grapevine and Southlake. The school districts involved will be represented by three at risk coordinators. The Board of Directors will be responsible for establishing policy and objectives for the program and will be responsible for reporting on the program to the various elected boards and councils. The Board of Directors may increase its membership upon majority vote. Program Narrative 4 6-14 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth The policy and objectives established by the Board of Directors will be administered by the program coordinators through the classroom and field activities of the D.A.R.E. Instructors and a currently funded school resource officer. The student population of the participating school districts is approximately 10,637 stu- dents. These students are distributed among 14 campuses. Although the grade levels housed in each school differs slightly between the two districts the D.A.R.E. courses would be instructed in eight elementary schools, three middle schools, one junior high and 2 high schools. Along with this public school participation there are approximately 10 private school and day care facilities currently using the McGruff Program along with visitations from police officers to help their students learn drug and personal safety concepts. We are proposing that the 17 week core curriculum be instructed in approximately 32 classes, the 10 week programs presented to an additional 25 classes and that five seek visitations be made to another 171 classes. This translates to over 1,158 hours of class- room instruction. *The attendance figures are based on Fall 1990 enrollment. Growth rate for each district has been 10% annually for the last two years. In addition to the classroom instruction the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program has estab- lished as a goal increased parental involvement. In order to accomplish this we plan to build on the positive "word of mouth" parents are receiving from their children. D.A.R.E. instructors are constantly confronted by parents who say "I've heard so much about you." We intend to have the parents hear not only about D.A.R.E. but become aware of the concepts instructed. Our approach to this will be four fold. First we will send out periodic letters to the parents informing them of the progress of the D.A.R.E. curriculum. This we let parents in on the process by letting them know exactly where their child is with regards to the lesson being taught. These letters will be sent home with suggestions for projects that parents and children could work on together, projects that help reinforce the concepts being discussed in D.A.R.E. Ap- proach number two is a D.A.R.E. newsletter, while written primarily for the students we believe the newsletter will be shared by the students and parents. The parents there- fore would be informed about current D.A.R.E. events and share the information and inspiration found in the newsletter. The newsletter will also provide parents with an insight on how well the lessons are working. They will be able to judge this for them- selves by reading the work of the students which are published in the newsletter. Our third technique for reading, parents will be the presentation of periodic parent forums. These forums will be conducted by D.A.R.E. instructors with the assistance of school district employees and local drug abuse counselors. These forums would fea- Program Narratives 5 C4 _ // City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth ture discussions on parenting, pressures faced by todays teens, local drug cultures, and group behaviors as witnessed by police and school authorities. These forums would also be designed to allow the parents time to gather answers to questions that arise during the rearing of children. It is important to note that the forums are designed as an educational tool not a promotional gimmick. It is our intent to provide a place for parents to get honest answers about drug and alcohol usage and how to help keep their kids from falling victim to the temptations of drugs. Finally we will attempt to publicize all aspects of the DA-R.E. program through a 10 minute TV segment called D.A.R.E. comer. The cable outlet serving the targeted com- munity has made available time for local crime prevention programming. This program appears bi-weekly. The D.A.R.E. corner will appear within the context of this crime prevention program. Lastly we need to address our final goal, community coordination. Presently the D.A.R.E. program enjoys wide spread support throughout our community. Unfor- tunately D.A.R.E. has no structure to organize that support. Our school district lines cross city borders and service clubs serve both communities. Therefore the organiza- tion of drug education under one umbrella for all communities clarifies the boundary problems. When these boundary problems are overcome all parties involved can set down to the serious work of organizing the existing community projects into a united chorus against drug abuse. On the intervention and treatment front our communities have organized the community chemical awareness council to provide coordinated assessment and treatment. We envision the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. program as this same type of catalyst group for child drug prevention education. Our group will network with civic organizations and governmental agencies though the association and relationships generated by our Board of Directors and the staff of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will activity seek our community groups who wish to help and match them to a need. A major community orientated project will be summer D.A.R.E. camp activities. Com- munity based activities for students to provide alternatives to drugs and reinforce the D.A.R.E. ideals. AIDS ISSUES D.A.R.E. will taught as an instruction unit within two school districts. Aids related topics will be addressed by district personnel in different instructional units. Program Narrative 6 G-1z City or Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D.A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Evaluation Plan Evaluation of the effectiveness of the program will be made by using entrance and exit polls. The D.A.R.E. students will be given a standardized list of questions designed to test attitudes toward drug abuse at the beginning of the D.A.R.E. instruction period and then the questions will be presented again at the end of the course. The results can then be compared to see if we have affected attitudes. Students will also be required to compose a "stand" or essay upon completion of the D.A.R.E. core curriculums. These "stands" will be used to measure the students grasp of the information presented to them. Parents will be polled annually with several questions about their perception of the D.A.R.E. curriculum and the attitude of their children toward drug abuse. This poll- ing will take place during an annual public survey conducted by the participating school districts. The Grapevine Colleyville ISD also participates in the P.R.I.D.E. (Parents Resource Institute for Drug Education Survey and the results of this survey will be studied in order to detect trends either upward or downward in drug and alcohol usage within the student body. This information will then be used to target groups for more intensive D.A.R.E. instruction and to measure the effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. instruction on reducing those usages. STAFFING N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will be staffed with five police officers, of the five officers four are funded by the grant and one is a continuing program placed within the grant or- ganization. The School Resource Officer program has been mentioned earlier in this proposal. For purposes of providing coordination between enforcement on campus and drug abuse education the School Resource Officer will be placed under the umbrella of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. program. He will also serve as a back-up to the D.A.R.E. instruc- tor in case of illness or injury. The four officers funded by the grant will all be D.A.R.E. instructors. One of these officers will be selected to serve as the program coordinator by the Board of Directors. Instructional responsibility will be divided among the four D.A.R.E. instructors based upon two guidelines. First we will strive to remain consistent wit the concept of feeder schools currently in place within our educational system. For the purposes of D.A.R.E. instruction the students that are receiving the 17 week core curriculum will be the top of the pyramid. Students in grades below this group shall be the feeder students. Program Narrative 7 400010--/-7 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D.A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Using this concept there are three geographic feeder systems within a target area each with a middle school and approximately two elementary schools feeding it. Therefore we intend to assign one D.A.R.E. officer to each middle school and it's feeder schools functioning as primary D.A.R.E. officer for that group. The fourth 1 D.A.R.E. officer would be assigned to the Grapevine Jr. High School to serve as primary D.A.R.E. instructor for the seventh and eighth curriculum and to as- sist any of the other D.A.R.E. instructors should the growth in any region outstrip the primary officers ability to cover the class time. The second criteria used for distribution of D.A.R.E. instructors will be the U. S. Department of Justice BJ.D. D.A.R.E. Implementation Manual recommendation that a D.A.R.E. officer teach no more than four 55 minute classes per day. The recommen- dation speaks directly to an officers ability to effectively interact and communicate with students. Our feeder school assignment sistem produces a workload picture for each officer would look like this: 14 classes X 17 week course = 238 instruction hours 24 visitations X 5 week course = 120 instruction hours 358 instruction hours 358 / 140 Instructional Day = 3 hours per day Each school year consists of approximately 170 days. For purpose of this equation, 30 days were subtracted to account for testing schedules and other occurrences that make outside instruction impractical or an interfemce with the clasroom teachers lesson plans. . The officer assigned to the Junior High would teach the following course schedule: 25 classes X 10 week course = 250 hours 4 special ed classes X 5 weeks = 20 hours 270 hours 270 / 140 = 2 hours per day This officer would also be assigned to the private and day schools visitations in the area and will be responsible for the coordination of the adult education aspects of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program. Program Narrative 8 W/—/t400, City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.iLE. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth ORGANIZATION QUALIFICATIONS The N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program will be a new organization formed under the direc- tion and with the complete support of several long standing governmental bodies. The cities of Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville have all consented to allow their respec- tive police departments to participate in the project. Both the Southlake/Carroll ISD and Grapevine Colleyville ISD have granted permission for the project to operate within their schools and have pledged financial and tutorial support. The make-up of the Board of Directors for the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. project firmly links this project to the responsible governmental bodies. The cities involved in this project have provided training for the officers involved in the program. In addition to bearing the cost of training the cities are supplying equipment for the use of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. staff as have the school districts. Our budgetary documents show that lion's share of the grant request will fund personnel salaries and related expenses, instructional material and operating costs. The facilities and capital equipment are for the most part being supplied to the program by the participating agencies. In addition to equipment and office space the City of Grapevine and Grapevine Col- leyville ISD are funding the School Resource Officer section of the program in it's en- tirety. This officer will be at the disposal of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program but will be funded entirely from city and school district funds. This represents a cash invest- ment of approximately $50,000. IMPLEMENTATION The personnel who will be assigned to N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. are for the most part on the payrolls of the various agencies. The procurement of any equipment not already owned by the participating agencies will be made via the participating agencies pur- chasing policies and therefore will comply with state procurement laws. Any delays in procurement of equipment will not effect the delivery of the lessons to the target populations. The agencies involved are committed to providing N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. with all start up assistance necessary and view this project as the future of drug abuse education in this area. Program Narrative 9 16 _/s- City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.RE. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Police linstructor - (D.A.R.E. Certified Police Officer) Qualifications: 1. Must be a licensed Texas peace officer. 2. Be able to communicate on all levels from kindergarten to school faculty. 4. Prior to entering the classroom, each officer must complete an 80-hour D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) certification training course. The curriculum will include teaching techniques, as well as elementary school operations, prepara- tion of visual aids, officer -school relationships, development of self-esteem, peer pressure resistance techniques, narcotics recognition, communication skills, child development, and classroom evaluations. 5. Outstanding moral character with stable home life. 6. Be a positive role model. Duties and Responsibilities: Being a D.A.R.E. instructor is a demanding job. While it may spare officers the bur- den of shift changes and weekend duty, they must agree, in the bargain to work very hard. The full extent of D.A.R.E. officers' duties and responsibilities can be seen in this list, culled from job descriptions for D.A.R.E. instructors teaching at the elemen- tary level: • teach D.A.R.E. core curriculum, spend time with students during recess and in the cafeteria, and participate in school activities such as assemblies and faculty meetings, etc. • prepare teaching materials (e.g., lesson plans, student notebooks and hand- outs, visual aids) and guides for teachers' auxiliary classroom activities. • teach kindergarten through 4th grade curriculum • prepare for and give presentations at faculty inservice meetings, parent meet- ings, and public speaking engagements • schedule and coordinate culmination (D.A.R.E. student graduation) exer- cises and complete D.A.R.E. diplomas. • teach the middle school curriculum • participate in extracurricular activities such as Halloween festivities, holiday programs, and field trips • present abbreviated programs to nonparticipating schools • attend inservice training sessions 01-14 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Project Coordinator - (D.A.R.E. Certified Police Officer) Qualifications: 1.- Must be a licensed Texas peace officer. 2. Be able to communicate on all levels from kindergarten to school faculty. 3. Must be eligible to qualify as D.A.R.E, officers mentor. 4. Prior to entering the classroom, each officer must complete an 80-hour D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) certification training course. The curriculum will include teaching techniques, as well as elementary school operations, prepara- tion of visual aids, officer -school relationships, development of self-esteem, peer pressure resistance techniques, narcotics recognition, communication skills, child development, and classroom evaluations. 5. Outstanding moral character with stable home life. 6. Be a positive role model. 7. Be capable of supervising N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. staff and operations budget. Duties and Responsibilities: Being a D.A.R.E. instructor is a demanding job. While it may spare officers the bur- den of shift changes and weekend duty, they must agree, in the bargain to work very hard. The full extent of D.A.R.E. officers' duties and responsibilities can be seen in this list, culled from job descriptions for D.A.R.E. instructors teaching at the elemen- tary level: • teach D.A.R.E. core curriculum, spend time with students during recess and in the cafeteria, and participate in school activities such as assemblies and faculty meetings, etc. • prepare teaching materials (e.g., lesson plans, student notebooks and hand- outs, visual aids) and guides for teachers' auxiliary classroom activities. • teach kindergarten through 4th grade curriculum • prepare for and give presentations at faculty inservice meetings, parent meet- ings, and public speaking engagements • schedule and coordinate culmination (D.A.R.E. student graduation) exer- cises and complete D.A.R.E. diplomas. • teach the middle school curriculum • participate in extracurricular activities such as Halloween festivities, holiday programs, and field trips City of Grapevine, Police Department NY—T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth • present abbreviated programs to nonparticipating schools • keep records of daily and monthly activities • attend inservice training sessions 6 -/4? GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS Dr. E.A. Siglar Jr. Superintendent of Schools Grapevine/Colleyville ISD Dr. Annette Griffen Superintendent of Schools Carroll ISD Chief Tom Caperton Chief of Police Grapevine Police Department Director James "Billy" Campbell Director of Public Safety Southlake DPS Chief Don Steele Chief of Police Colleyville Police Department ORGANIZATION CHART N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E CITY OF COLLEYVILLE GRAPEVINE/COLLYVILLE ISD CITY OF GRAPEVINE SOUTHLAKE/CARROLL ISD CITY OF SOUTHLAKE NORTHEAST TARRAN COUNTY D.A.R.E. BOARD OF DIRECTORS GRAPEVINE, CHIEF of POLICE SOUTHLAKE, DIRECTOR of DPS COLLEYVILLE, CHIEF of POLICE G.C.I.S.D. AT RISK COORDINATOR S.C.I.S.D. AT RISK COORDINATOR NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY D.A.R.E. STAFF PROJECT COORDINATOR/D.A.R.E.INSTR. D.A.R.E. INSTR. GRAPEVINE D.A.R.E. INSTR. SOUTHLAKE D.A.R.E. INSTR. COLLEYVILLE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER City of Southlake, Texas EIM0RANDUM February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Mike Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Resolution 91-08, Reconstruction of SH114 Resolution No. 91-08 is a resolution from the City of Southlake supporting the proposed improvements to SH114 by the SDHPT and requesting the SDHPT to consider the feasibility of adding an eastbound exit ramp between Dove Road and White Chapel Boulevard. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call me. InO MHB/kb 47- / NO RESOLUTION NO.91-08 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF STATE HIGHWAY 114 \ CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN SOUTHLAKE; REQUESTING THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND RECONSIDER THE PROPOSED EXIT RAMP BETWEEN DOVE AND WHITE C PEL BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is concerned about traffic and highway conditions on SH114, and; WHEREAS, the improvements to SH114 proposed by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation as presented in the public hearing conducted on January 17, 1991, at the Marriott Solana, will greatly improve the traffic situation in the City of Southlake; and, WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to have the improvements proceed as quickly as possible; now, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That the above premises are hereby declared to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Southlake endorses the general concept and schematic design of the SH114 improvements through the City of Southlake. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Southlake requests the SDHPT review and reconsider the proposed access to White Chapel Blvd. from SH114 to include a possible eastbound exit ramp between Dove and White Chapel. Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor Im Resolution 91-08 page two ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.91-09 Iq IM CUSE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF E CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING OF CREDIT CARD PAYMENT ON CITY FINES, URT COSTS, UTILITY BILLS AND OTHER CHARGE A METHOD OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING ANFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 132 of the Local Government Code provides that a municipality may authorize the use of credit cards for payments of City charges; and, WHEREAS, the use of credit cards would provide a convenient service with little or no cost to the City; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. Municipal officials who collect for, fines, court costs, utility bills, and other charges may, (a) accept payments by Credit Card of said fee, fine, court cost, utility bill, or other charge, (b) collect a fee for processing the payment by Credit Card. Section 3. Prior to accepting use of Credit Cards for payment of charges, the appropriate City Staff shall solicit requests for proposals for credit card service from financial institutions or other companies providing such service. Section 4. This resolution is hereby in effect upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 9 -/ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fic es, Mayor Resolution 91-09 page two ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGran City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake, gz. A t C A0 Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Cities and counties can accept credit cards... Fines,? taxes , Charge ifplease! ities and counties can now accept credit cards for payments of fines, fees, court costs, property taxes, utility bills, car fees and taxes and other charges. It may well be worth your while to accept plastic instead of cash. Here's why: • Your bad debt/hot check problems diminish; • Your outstanding delinquent taxes may de- crease; • There is little or no cost to the city/county; • It's good taxpayer service: it's convenient for people who cannot come up with instant cash to pay for fines, property taxes, utility bills, etc; • It can be an additional source of revenue if cities and counties work with credit card com- panies to seize bad credit cards, and • It may be faster than accepting checks, because a machine can verify the credit card at the same time payment is made, eliminating check deposit clearance time. Although the legal authority to accept credit cards has been on the books for three years, the Comptroller's Local Government Division is aware of only three jurisdictions that presently use credit cards —the Austin and Fort Worth municipal courts and the Travis County tax office. "We've been accepting credit cards for just over a year, and it's worked out beautifully," said Cecelia Burke, Travis County Tax Assessor -Collector. "It's speeded up collections and eliminated a lot of bad check hassle —and it's really appreciated by a lot of our taxpayers who don't have the ready cash." Burke said that her office hasn't had any real problems with accepting credit cards. "We can't come up with any 'cons =it's all 'pros'. It's really a winner for the taxpayer, my office and the county." The Travis County Tax Office accepts credit cards for property taxes, motor vehicle registration fees, motor vehicle sales taxes, occupation taxes, motor vehicle title transfer fees and license or permit fees under the Alcoholic Beverage Code. Burke and her office staff provided some of the information in this report, and are happy to talk to other cities and counties that are interested - - offering credit card payments to their taxpayers and customers. The Austin and Fort Worth municipal courts have accepted credit cards for just a few months.. They also have favorable reports, and are very willing to discuss their experiences (see box on page 2 for names and phone numbers). We'd also like to hear from other citv and coun- ty offices that accept credit cards. We are prepar- ing an in-depth report on who uses them and the experiences they have had. This report discusses the basics —legal authority, handling the processing costs and so on. Legal authority to accept plastic The general legal authority for cities and counties to accept credit cards is in the Local Government Code, Chapter 132. It says that the city council or county commis - See page 12 7-3 ounty Financial Management. November 1990 11 Continued from page 11 sioners court may authorize city/county officials who collect "fees, fines, court costs or other charges" to accept payment by credit card and to collect a fee for this service. There is also specific authorization for the coun- ty tax assessor -collector to accept a credit card (or check) for the following charges (Local Govern- ment Code 130.002): (1) motor vehicle registration fees; (2) motor vehicle sales taxes; (3) occupation taxes paid to the assessor -col- lector under Chapter 191, Tax Code; (4) motor vehicle title transfer fees under the Certificate of Title Act; (5) license or permit fees under the Alcoholic Beverage Code and (6) property taxes. (Specific authority was needed for the county tax official in order to extend the credit card pay- ments to the various state fees collected by that official. Cities may collect local taxes under the broader authority of Chapter 132 of the Local Government Code.) Processing fees Most of the additional cost of accepting credit cards is the fee charged by the bank. This can range from 1 to 5 percent or more. The law allows your city/county to recover the additional costs by charging a processing fee that is reason- ably related to the expense incurred in handling the credit card payment. The processing fee must be set by the governing body and may not exceed 5 percent of the amount charged. In order to get the best deal for your taxpayers, you'll want to shop around among financial insti- tutions that offer credit card services, and talk with other local governments that have credit card con- tracts. You may go out on bids for credit card ser- vices. Here's an example of figuring the processing fee. A citation is issued by a city police officer for one violation that is punishable by a fine of $200 or less. The defendant pays in a timely manner with a credit card. Fine $200.00 State court costs 1250 Arrest fee 5.00 Total due $21750 5-percent city processing fee for credit card payment:.05 X $217.50 10.88 Total charged $228.38 Note: Make sure that your contract with the bank stipulates that the bank's fee is figured on the amount due before the city/county processing fee is added on. Otherwise, you may lose money. In this example, if the bank figures its fee as .05 X $228.38, it'll charge you $11.42, but you'll collect a processing fee from the defendant of only $10.88. Banks normally provide adequate supplies of printed forms for charges, credits, deposits and other transactions. They also provide imprinting - o-_c ar a or sing..cre" cap sM ,y- Busmesses Thai accept cxedt �' ` _ ° credit.;card transactioris Also the federa law ='ping "fee to their banks-Howeverathe raw does "nor -�_ that used. to prohitiif surc rues on credit card allow them to pass the adddional cost- abng to the $ transactions expired in Febniary.1984 ¢customer (they ;may, offer iscourits fo payfig In ` .Unfortunately; ,many banks Areal aware j. at .it's cash; but 4na not irnpose a for ` `OiC for cdies and"�coUries to charge the pro)essing, r Y ._ - - fY• • 6 ' a mayo w. +a. 3 ?�. card}.' , gee.; use the standard"cxed card contractihat '>b rh6M!jg antra chaarges o ayuHowever, .isp�� # county'that-ecccxedit 'to : a credit may node witlinga. tee pts s :. wv Comer a spec-ia,�.'te�`%r--- ng- ith arc • � . ri: • *`th�s clause_ - umeau of by or �u < : r What can-y your �ank`won't detete at= zThe state la" that authorize noun- clause?Try- other b�nres Or�all us.for a copypf a ties to charge a processing fee supe gds a ;Travis County Attomey's opInion`that says the sur- more geneial prohtbitton against surcharges one charge is __7 12 November 1990 City & County Financial Management U— l machines for the charge/credit slips. What about bad credit? Bad credit is normally not a problem. Once a charge transaction has been authorized by the credit card company, usually by phone or by a special machine linked directly to the credit card company, the city/county has its money. If the taxpayer doesn't pay the credit card bill, the bank assumes the collection burden. However, if for some reason a charge transac— tion is not honored by the credit card company, the city/county may collect an additional service fee from the person who owes the money. The amount of this service fee is set by law at the amount the city/county charges for hot checks. Selzing credit cards creates revenue The law also allows cities and counties to contract with the credit card company to seize its credit 5?--57" cards that are outdated or otherwise unauthorized. The county or municipality may charge the credit card company a fee for the return of the credit cards. The law does not set this fee; it should be negotiated with the credit card company. Good taxpayer service Accepting credit cards instead of checks or cash may mean a little more paperwork, but there should be very little additional cost. And it can be a valuable service to taxpayers in your areas, especially for those who can't find the cash to pay property taxes or unexpected fines. One of the benefits of accepting plastic money may be that taxpayers are more apt to pay what they owe to the city or county, especially if they can just whip out the plastic and say, "charge it!"! For more information: See the "Special Thanks" box on page 2 And call the Comptroller's Local Government Division, Toll -free 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4679. A city of soutntaKe, i exas February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR CITY HALL RENOVATION The Space Utilization Committee met with the architect, Allen/Buie & Associates, in early January to determine the guidelines for the architect to follow in preparing plans and specifications for the City Hall Renovation Project. As a result of an investigation by the architect's mechanical and structural engineers, it was decided by the Committee to have the architects prepare plans and specifications that would include the following as a base bid: (see attached Upper and Lower Floor Plans) 1. Floor the entire upstairs area. 2. Divide and finish out the proposed upstairs floor area into a squad room, sergeant's office, office 1, C.I.D. office, mechanical room, hallway corridor, one finished bathroom and stub out for a future bathroom (see Upper Level Floor Plan). 3. Turn the existing C.I.D. room into a records room and police photo lab. (see Lower Level Floor Plan) 4. Construct an outside stairway as an exit for the upstairs. 5. Install an outside door to the jail. 6. Expand the existing downstairs electrical room 1 1/2 feet. 7. Install two windows in City Manager's office and squad room. 8. Replace wall in jail corridor (see Lower Level Floor Plan) and in the Evidence room to support proposed upper level flooring. Also included in the specifications are two alternate bids. The first alternate bid is to complete the second restroom and the second alternate is to provide new carpet in the Captain's, police and secretary's offices, and the P.D. reception and stairway areas. The architect has estimated that the base bid and the two alternate bids would be between $65,000 to $75,000 and the base bid would be between $60,000 to $65,000. The architect's fee is estimated to be approximately $7,000, bringing the total estimated project cost to $67,000 to $82,000. 9-/ City of Southlake, Texas The original estimate for the renovation was $30,000, but that only included expanding the squad room, office 1 (as indicated on the attachment), installing the exit corridor and the outside stairway. It was determined by the Committee that it would be appropriate to completely finish the upstairs area now, thus allowing the Department of Public Safety to efficiently utilize the proposed expansion. The police C.I.D., Office 1, and sergeant's rooms are badly needed now. There is approximately $41,000 remaining from the. $200,000 Contractual Obligation Account. To fund the remaining $26,000 to $41,000 would come from the undesignated fund balance. Therefore, it is requested that this item be placed on the Council's agenda to consider authorizing the staff to advertise for bids for the City Hall Renovation Project. If you have any questions, please contact me. "/ W MHB/lc attachments: Upper and Lower Floor Plans -a L R D. SECY. RECEPTION t POLICE CHIEF NOW C-Ao,%-r L! 4 0: 0!-' I f STO. CAPTAIN MECH. cr OFFICE 0 C3 "16114- -4- CIO u OFFICE 2 [4]1 Mi iS UAD RM.11w* IcIlz ; JCI: TLT, 2 T Iq SGT LL /* Jul M, Ml 4081 .3 Fw�-) or LS -��4!2 av I Job +*;Zh it t L -A UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8 to = 1 I 0 to 9 3 4C FA 12 R li j COURT CLERK DISPATCH COURT FILES =7 VEST I ELEC. Li qORRIDOR 3 —Not 16. VEST 2 INTERVIEW �� ` RECORDS 14111 9.1-1 BOOKING TLT. 3 d LAS 15 03 - �4 -4 -I—cORIRI DOR 4 EVIDENCE 1C4 4 746 WA CELL CELL r CELL if MAMT ISIwAZZ, 4 WA to I (voovr-r To aoq YwPL- -Im7� LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8" =I' 0" CITY ADMIN. CITY MOR. 5 let. I ;o CITY SEC. LOBE City of Southlake, Texas M E M 0 R A N D January 30, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager M, KA� FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Advertise for Bids for Asphalt Tow Paver In the 1990-91 street budget the Council approved the purchase of an asphalt tow paver. The paver is a small asphalt lay down machine that spreads asphalt over a large area. The budget amount is $10,000. It is requested that permission be given to advertise for bids for the tow paver. If permission is given, it is anticipated that an award be made the first council meeting in March. Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for consideration. MHB/lc City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M January 30, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Recycling Contract - BFI The Environmental Task Force and Staff reviewed a proposed contract submitted by BFI and made changes to the contract. The City Attorney's reviewed the contract after the Task Force's review and made additional changes. Because of the numerous changes, BFI had to return the contract to their national office in Houston for their approval. BFI has indicated that they may or may not have the revised contract to the City by the Council meeting on Tuesday. If they are not able to get the contract by Tuesday, it will be considered at the next Council meeting (Feb. 19). BFI has indicated that if this were to occur, it would not hinder the Recycling Program's proposed start date of April 1, 1991. Please place this on the Council's next agenda for their consideration. Ir6 H6 MHB/lc attachment: BFI Contract City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 16, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-69 Zoning Change Request ZA 90-69 is a zoning change request for 3.267 acres out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 Tract 4C. The property is located on the east side of South White Chapel Blvd. approximately one-half mile south of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is Agricultural; the requested zoning is SF-lA. The owners of the property are Wilfred and Veronika Anderson. They propose building a single-family residence on this site. There were ten (10) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there has been one (1) written response: Lenora H. Herron, 500 S. White Chapel Blvd., was opposed "because of the effect it might have on (her) property in future years." On January 3, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of this zoning request. On January 15, 1991, the City Council approved (5-0) the First Reading of Ordinance No. 480-39 for the SF-lA zoning district. KPG 3- / CITY OF SOL'TfiLAKE APPLICATION FOR A14ff�'YDME [T TO ZONING MAP Application No. ZA qC -1 q To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. :iA.ME OF APPLICA1NT: ADDRESS: J,Aj (fir=.Erb F . pc2s v..r I cr'os s c2c_r_�L IJ,2 C p�r-- vi tJ E TA- 7 6 0,f/ DESCRIPTION (11E.TES AND BOU-NDS) OF PROPERTY REQL'E,STED TO BE REZONED: ZONLVG RBQL=: ITMI: T0: S F ( A This application crust be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. I;?-/b-1?0 DATE SI OF PERSON FILLNG BUST BE OTF �OF THE PROPERTY Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared W i 1 frcd E. And e r�cn kno%m to me to be the person whose nacre is subscribed to the foregoing instrunent and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the sane for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this / C �L day of Pe c c m i e r- , 19 "0 44e'ry wrARY PUBLIC IN m FOR TEXAS My Commission expires the / % day of �i�/yUi/ , 19 1.3-b DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING REQUEST For a tract of land in the Little Berry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, situated in Tarrant County, Texas; Being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGIN14ING at an iron pin at the Northeast corner of the herein described tract in the Westerly line of White Chapel Boulevard (County Road No.3019), said point being, by deed call 1914.20 feet South and 25.0 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Hall Survey; THENCE South 0 degrees, 03 minutes, 51 seconds West, 631.77 feet along the Westerly line of said White Chapel Boulevard to an iron pin in same at its intersection with the proposed North R.O.W. line of Southlake Boulevard (Farm -to• -Market Highway No. 1709), said point being in a curve to the left having a radius of 2949.79 feet and being the Southeast corner of the tract; THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 87 degrees, 42 minutes, 20 seconds West, 70.82 feet a distance of 70.82 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 88 degrees, 43 minutes, 43 seconds West, 103.11 feet to an iron pin at the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 2954.79 feet; 4 1 THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 83 degrees, 09 minutes, 36 seconds West, 183.29 feet a distance of 183.32 feet to an iron pin; THENCE - South 80 degrees, 57 minutes, 38 seconds West, 22.07 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 75 degrees, 55 minutes, 31 seconds West, 201.05 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 81 degrees, 10 minutes, 28 seconds West, 277.30 feet to an iron pin at the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 5659.58 feet; THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 81 degrees, 5U minutes, 42 seconds West, 41.12 feet a distance of 41.12 feet to an iron pin for the Southwest corner of the tract; THENCE North 01 degrees, 07 minutes, 07 seconds West, 756.51 feet to an iron pin for the Northwest corner of the tract; THENCE North 89 degrees, 56 minutes, 38 seconds East, 903.19 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 14.0748 acres. 13-.3 I11FARK IMP TROPHY CLUB RAN ' wa M --- ; an JOOER I "nun NOIUN 'i' MOa a NFCR M i MOM IN 7 UAVEI A SWAN g R CUM MAKE �W _ _WON COUNTY --- -_ 2 UNT—Y u a 4RRANTCO—� ; TUL L� tM W nwlF i DISTRICT BOUND IO SOL ANA "!W Yxfx IE S'a I= ' in'alll ��UU a� I i IcT s IN o I� 2 wam CKMWTTU ` INIW UK \ t iOOTNE rLIF a uM YNNOLAIIOIs `u ±~ I LW. Est _ _ 114 ` mu urm A� � ' Mesa in" UM L TV LIN LI W 'Iz �� TAILOR AT in K 4 1� m a Ict Q WI R011N Ie•,. ..� MVE RT_N CARROU •. e� x HIGH SCHOOL. _ z� I• � e• r faTTAN C7 '-i s ,",. 2 t me No 4, s F I _ rammu in `` f�w� "` •' WzaR aoiE s uE: =i •�UKLANLN =gam ��. . c- isUc: e UK N t NTATIM+ .IM - 1 ■ xw .AOTiCK a irf" N O �l To �`1M0 C g AT I t I WMCRC E nmtLFNffO C ?y a CTAE 46I LN A LONNONOIINTn' IT O ALICE CT t OR •3 K 0. JOHNSO $" f TMNAi ct ILO ELEMENTARY ■ T rxUNOLE CT O RNRUM F O MI GN70N C MINE CREE30, ■ CARROLL I f A'Ei a. AAA'T CIDDLE Yill .,I J NEAfw !RiTINrR[ v r• ^A *� FLfaNCE — M L �f ... nE in f Am0 M 1— REEM MUOII xr YIENLARO TI I COVE LOVE NEMT CT �OL1.1110 11 O xILLRIEEefi CITY LODGE a HALL lu `NaeO(�tl'� `e Cilium 74- z r ■ I�aYE1Elx qi IICENTENNIAL NO ttYO r` �:cOLUEEwRET` aM war �: : C PARR e _ JONNS�N II IEEE"'= fMTaA fIYO- •'� -- ION Icy xuTNLAKE OLVG.E ��— IIA 6Ea•TN. Y' , \AotpoarOOGDSN MS LIL Fill 3 ; I �`o�' l, �.100r s - ACop . o in EIGANGE Kill i RAINIO_N a Ric EIiGIEEKWNO �W - �,•: �E7 Y i4E7E MIM �` iJ f(� I i Q rir S I� _ " (� CONTFKTAr�, =�-� \\� ` CNTIN IIV0.. N 3 ,.I`+ I.`+ CONTINENTAL ILYO_ E ��` • CARROW o •• ' scr ` ; a` iE MENlART ■�`-'j.�- T �/�O Si •• I owns at r= _s i I l'`�•'`. `1 COLLEYVILLE 25 r / f r — I � .•� TR 3K 11. 2.5 AC P 041W - TR 3J (�• 2.5 AC TR 3H1 1.0 AC 471 >i TR 3H 1.0 AC p TR 3G 2.0 AC HERRON AG L.aF.ati•'�R 3E s AG .73 AC =� so !.o no p1 AU�A 4 AUBREY &MITH AG TR 47-S Cl L_aFAVERS I �\ TR C � AG ,,,ve a �� no BARRETT TR IF 5 8 �TR WAG JOE BAILEY 5 AC § 1.63 AC I AG an TR 3F 4.23 AC 2 ES AC 1 1NE � P 32A PINE ACRE 3 TR 393 KOVARNI K -s,o-AC I SF1 m ROY IEYNE AG i $ TR 48 IDELORIS I 4.5 AC I W.�NIDA PULLIAM IPEARS � I 2A I RE I RE i 1 I I 3 4A i AR i APES PLp,CE WHItE �N p653s z 13-5 � � =�i:-:ii=3 :1s' �ss::5 ': iii.:s 33i 3 3°•i i lY=33J. i i=i i�=I- ash- :! l h m 3 3 = •�:•. �ii A ;iis as.:� x t;i ssx ii z : i �?ri �i ?_=!:y:i :i?i� •rise• i::::: :3z i ;lsi; 333! s '�•-i �ir� �='i�� ;-=�� =3��sf'F i �3aa^ ^�� i j:�j• � �i;f � f �o si is. i_. s ' 8•`a R d � � s! idc E 3 �t� " ii e i IS I I I i : I I � I I I I i= • s lno &_ /3-4 of -f-=Y OF SOUTHLAK S \ % ORDINANCE N0. 480-39 A ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE � OMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 3.267 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE HIRAM GRANBERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 581, TRACT 4C, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO SINGLE FAMILY-1A DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; ANJ� PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. /� WHEREA a e, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise /3-7 It producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location, of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: -2- /3-9 Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 3.267 acre tract of land out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 4C, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From Agricultural to Single Family-lA. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land.herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained. in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general. welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of lard throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract (W or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00). A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day, of 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1990. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -4- / 3-//a City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 16, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-66 Zoning Change Request ZA 90-66 is a zoning change request for 14.0748 acres out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tracts 1C and 1C3, being located at the Northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Blvd. and West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The current zoning is Commercial-2; the requested zoning is S-P-2 (Generalized) Site Plan District. The owners of the property are Trustees, E-Systems Inc. Pool Trust and the Estate of J. F. Schnitzer, Inetta Schnitzer, Executrix. The applicant is PIMA Properties. The proposed use of this site is for a shopping center to be known as Crossroads Square. The developer proposes 111,500 square feet of lease space in Phase I and 15,000 square feet in Phase II. All of the proposed structures are in compliance with the height requirements of the C-3 district. There were fourteen (14) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. On January 15, 1991, a petition opposing this request was received containing 156 signatures which represented 83 property owners in Mission Hill Estates and Diamond Circle Estates. Of these property owners, only four (4) were within 200 feet. Their protest represents approximately percent (10%) of the land area within 200 feet of the subject property. On December 20, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of tabling the S-P-2 zoning request until January 3, 1991 to enable the developer to address some of the neighbors' concerns voiced during the public hearing. On January 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-2) of the S-P-2 request. Those in opposition had concerns about the intensity of the proposed Commercial-3 ("C-3") uses being "placed contiguous to or in direct proximity to residential zoning" (i.e. Diamond Circle Estates). City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager January 16, 1991 V Page Two On January 15, 1991, the City Council approved (4-0) the First Reading of Ordinance No. 480-38, a request for S-P-2 zoning with C-3 uses allowed, deleting those uses suggested by the applicant in his letter dated January 15, 1991. They further suggested that the issue regarding bufferyards and sidewalks be addressed during the review process of a development site plan prior to issuance of a building permit. FAI I, KPG CITY OF SOUIHLAKE APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING MAP Application No. ZA it) --6 To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will infozm you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: %RuSTEEs _ F:sys�S .Tyc fooL7�sl' /?D_ fox 6�� -�4�,c. �tS.T 75a66 DESCRIPTION 01ETES AND BOLNDS) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE REZONED: ZONL�'G REQUEST: FROM: C z T0: 5-P- 2. This application waist be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. 7` OG % OBER 90 ME DATE ' OF PER��N FILING BE 1096 012ft -1+6) W I C+1 Yil Before me, a votary Public, on this day personally appeared fMES� C�Pbu1tE',� known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrunent and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 19 9a ..... RATE OF 1�M NUTARY PUBLIC L AND FOR TEX. �'�► w w�+ My CN - Env A* IL 1W My Commission e. ires the day of 19 Jj -3 CITY OF SOU' 1U-An APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING MAP Application No. ZA '70 -6 6 To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: (!M/4 PRop&lz r/L:s v2q�?-`? CAf?e-)SLC J7- Suir 300 iA«A S 7-X. 73-2-� K- DESCRIPTION (METES AND BOUNDS) OF PROPERTY REQTT-. ID TO BE REZONED: 8 � i ACnEs ZONING REQUEST: FROM: r_—'I,?- TO: S 7 - This application must be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is ,to be attached to this application. i/-/s'yd DATE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared 0- known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrianent and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the sacre for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 19 CPO ooca�or' '' //11 REBECCA L. WELCH 111'21 Rotary Public, State of Texas ?2-111 s My Commission Expires 1-15-91 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TEXAS �•��f��-+► My Carmission expires the � day of DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING REQUEST For a tract of land in the Little Berry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, situated in Tarrant County, Texas; Being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin at the Northeast corner of the herein described tract in the Westerly line of White Chapel Boulevard (County Road No.3019), said point being, by deed call 1914.20 feet South and 25.0 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Hall Survey; THENCE South 0 degrees, 03 minutes, 51 seconds West, 631.77 feet along the Westerly line of said White Chapel Boulevard to an iron pin in same at its intersection with the proposed North R.O.W. line of Southlake Boulevard (Farm -to -Market Highway No. 1709), said point being in a curve to the left having a radius of 2949.79 feet and being the Southeast corner of the tract; THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 87 degrees, 42 minutes, 20 seconds West, 70.82 feet a distance of 70.82 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 88 degrees, 43 minutes, 43 seconds West, 103.11 feet to an iron pin at the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 2954.79 feet; 4 ' THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 83 degrees, 09 minutes, 36 seconds West, 183.29 feet a distance of 183.32 feet to an iron pin; THENCE . South 80 degrees, 57 minutes, 38 seconds West, 22.07 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 75 degrees, 55 minutes, 31 seconds West, 201.05 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 81 degrees, 10 minutes, 28 seconds West, 277.30 feet to an iron pin at the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 5659.58 feet; THENCE Southwesterly with the arc of said curve whose long chord bears South 81 degrees, 5U minutes, 42 seconds West, 41.12 feet a distance of 41.12 feet to an iron pin for the Southwest corner of the tract; THENCE North 01 degrees, 07 minutes, 07 seconds West, 756.51 feet to an iron pin for the Northwest corner of the tract; THENCE North 89 degrees, 56 minutes, 38 seconds East, 903.19 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 14.0748 acres. lk Al.. LOOP TROPHY CLUB Ul sn Jews Ill. I PMUM NKLIVF 2 KOININILN NEATEN SWAN I CRANE WAT�LAKE �ON COUNTY IN, AN 4RRAArTcoWT—y� DISTRICT BOUND la so "A ON 114 liI Is— lo J;gj "low, I. ju 3 IMMINGION! Ll BRITIAN CT Ll K I BLEE" v as Ta cym cyM fig . FAINKESM KIN61199 Cis ♦W IM 444 cr FLUMENCE' ILE "MARY To COVE MILUM TA Nv NR Iw SOUTNLA \AGOODE --will j�? torpoar & lllltEL! GREENWOOD CONTINENTAL 1, 111, IN A CARRO 141— a t Lo LANE Tr0 Noo CL IAK E —W om San I MLLM CKSUNTa Me 2ppN 9 OEM 3 SOUTILM Pr—w Ll woNIuLAM RLLTIP _j . I un K" 0 1 T MON ST a. MUST- E acul ASCHOOL SCHOOL X a PMNANE LN wiswm; '118 am ABWMK BY I CAPROCK I TUMBLEWEED C 3 VOUNDUP Ell 4 LOUMN Ell ST K 0. HN IB I CT TVVM CT EIEMFNTADT NNUMNB ST I Ai 7 PANUMBLE LIE I M CANTH sm can U- MRROIDDLELL SCHOOL CIO J, offm RIM go L RE CITY HALL■ SOUTKAAE KVL E at are ME CT. 1 7 UL&C RAINBOW IT CONTINENTAL lw� i.. cc� "< . Q I cc an I L�7 am 0 U A w Z a N w OK U Q vnmam vorm mmun r. a , i . sa�ualr su3agam mca ; t 6 �w I t 11 c Z-S Q3NOZ S3�13d 01 14-P O I W a 1 City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:ZA 90-66 REVIEW NO: THIRD DATE OF REVIEW:01/09/91 PROJECT NAME: S-P-2 Site Plan - Crossroads Square DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trustee P.O. Box 660248 Dallas, Texas 752466 O1/07/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: John E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce, Ste. 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 788-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. * We find the applicant has met the requirements of our. previous review. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers /4-9 PI ■ ■AA 1111111'Elk'TIESP 2929 CARLISLE, SUITE 300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75204 f 214) $55-0021 pgaaawiftA j anuary 15. 199,t Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of South 1 ake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake. Texas 76092 RE: Zonina Request NWC White's Chapel & 1709 Dear Karen: As you are aware. Pima Properties Is seeking a rezoning of the subject tract of land from C-2 to S-P-2 (C-3). Further. we are seeking a specific use permit in order to be able to sell beer in the proposed grocery and drug stores. There is some opposition to both of these requests by some nearby residents. Aster listening to the concerns voiced by the opposition we have reviewed the zoning ordinances as to the uses allowed in the existing category and as to what would be allowed under the requested classification of S-P-2 (C-3). Under the S-P-2 zoning the City Council has the power to restrict or delete certail uses. Therefore. we are herein asking you to inform the Council that the following uses are not V desirable to us and we are asking that they be deleted from possible uses for the site. Page 21-2: Page 22-2: 24. Frozen Food lockers for individual or family_ use . not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 4. Delete "bowling alleys" from the paragraph this paragraph. 6. Conventional golf courses. Including outdoor drivina ranges accessory thereto. but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses. 15. Locaes. sororities and on fraternities. /4-10 16. Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes. hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients. staff and visitors. (Please note that It is not our intent to limit or delete the use allowed under C-2 zoning listed as paragraph 26 on page 21-2) 17. Mortuaries. funeral homes and undertakers. 25. Skating rinks. ice and roller (indoor only). 26. Taverns. clubs. and other comparable establishments under which the on -premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of this ordinance. The mere reference to this provision within the zoning ordinance does not indicate or imply that the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages has been or will be permitted under the alcoholic beverage laws of the State of Texas. It is onlv intended to define a location for this type of use if its existence should be permitted by state law. (Please note that it is not our Intent to limit or delete the possibility of locating within this tract a restaurant that might want to apply for liquor sales at a later date) I apologize for delivering this to you at such a late date. I hope you will be able to deliver copies of this to members of the Council prior to tonight's meeting and to make copies available to the public and in particular to those in opposition of our zoning request. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or need anv clarification. My office number is (214) 855-0071. Sincerely, David C. McMahan CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-38 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO* AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OW THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 14.0748 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE LITTLEBERRY G. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. / 686, TRACTS 1C AND 1C3, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO S-P-2 SITE PLAN DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE •FFISIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' WHEREAS, the Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as C-2 Local Retail Commercial under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and s*ationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; treet size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the. over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: /1%/3 0-a- Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 14.0748 acre tract of land out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tracts 1C and 1C3, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From C-2 Local Retail Commercial District to S-P-2 (Generalized) Site Plan District allowing any use in the C-3 General Commercial District except the following: 21.2(24) Frozen Food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 22.2(4) Bowling Alleys 22.2(6) Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses. 22.2(15) Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 22.2(16) Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors. 22.2(17) Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers 22.2(25) Skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only) 22.2(26) Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on -premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of this ordinance. The above -described tract of land shall be further subject to the development regulations set forth in the C-3 General Commercial District and any other restrictions and requirements set forth on the approved site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." A revised site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the City Council prior to issuance of any building permits. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. V-1T-3- Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. / y-1r 4 - Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption ( and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place �r for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect form and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1991. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -5- /`/-/6 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 18, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-72 Revised Preliminary Plat ZA 90-72 is a revised preliminary plat of Block 6, SouthRidge Lakes, being described as 20.37 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. This lot is the Commercial-3 site at the Northeast corner of North Peytonville Avenue and West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The owner of the property is Arvida/JMB Partners L.P. II. They propose three (3) lots on this site instead of the one (1) large commercial lot as originally approved in April, 1989. There were thirteen (13) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no responses or inquiries regarding this revision. On January 17, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the revised preliminary plat subject to the staff review comments dated January 8, 1991. Item #8 regarding "underground easement" was discussed and referred to the City Attorney to see if this terminology would in any way create a liability for the City. After discussions with the City Attorney and with a TU Electric representative, it was determined that no liability would be imposed on the City with the addition of the word "underground" to the utility easement. �')I/ 0111 KPG Informational Note: It was confirmed with the City Attorney that it was proper to notify only those property owners within 200 feet of Block 6. Notification of all property owners surrounding the entire development was not indicated. 15- 1 DEC2 6 i9:� CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 2/07/90 TITLE SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: C:7 F, J1, Iz TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES: APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: A000 se iOAI &IA-a,S, l taJ--X ADDRESS: o T 7s2¢� PHONE: 2)4-- !O 7 I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivisic Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning ommmission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request and address unr s lved issues. Signed: Date: %2- jv For Cit Us Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ ISO on this the J day of : r..uj,, 197/ . Signed: Title: X 1:cj�,4 nwt:1��v-� The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 anc No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. .� Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100', 1" = 200' f North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes.total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) i Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Standard approval block provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. i Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intercom+A --, shown with street names Pg. 2 of 2 Shown Not GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 2/07/90 On Plan Applic. Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage. Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. Show existing traveled roadway widths General outline of area embraced by tree cover —G All existing easements shown (Type & Size) i Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) PROPOSED INFORMATION Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line ./ 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) i Street names provided not similar to any existing street names R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned / Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted i 50' setback line sham on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) ✓ Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above ✓ Any proposed zoning labeled as such Quantitative land use schedule provided (No. 483-3.02-C-30) Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc. / Approximate flood plain and floodway limits shown. Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) ✓ Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) ✓ 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) Not ' ' Included Included PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FLANS Preliminary water layout showing all existing and proposed lines adjacent to the property and within the tract Preliminary sewer layout Preliminary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3.02-C-33) and No. 482 15-3 j 'ic A- - 1% �4 AOS LOOF" TROPHY CLUB SAN rl :-3 mm N G� EVI E' NN JNES I& 1 P MM NOW " Non No NEC[ N +•t`� F•?i. '^e . _ - S IEANFN- ISWAN �EYzc .s.rt WATLAKE Y SON OUNTY - - -- �+ —i - u C TRAIL LANE TN SS OA 4RRANTCOUNTY ----- - - - w TN LAU IS ; 1 DISTRICTEEOUND -- --- ---hl- In �p SOLANA .' WWM f1N Iv ! Of 60 I INL=ON ti \ 2 CNSCEn N W 0.N _ IS SWAVLAKE IN ~sum, r L�NEOUF S NFIE- 2W N E Asm MNTYNNN N 0114 W f ST On .. N3=LI TATLO/ S7 r r Of E CT Ip 'N ST-I ILLOC Gl,� �► 5 ,� N i 1¢ r BOVE ST_ IN CAANOLL< o + e J ¢ AouN ;ti r r ..�:I• i� — xwx ScxooL culm 1 rNNI■SerO IN " ;w4o CT q, :_I " " 2 KVEK LrrrNosE u ` Y 'j ( NrNr rNef i INATIV '1 - —--'---"--� NfaV * NLANL■ LAAEO: r ;ilt RATMgI M' g M y S■N4 ♦A/NiR - ! c 1 4. SLEFn N OU F+N To y - 2 NNRENEEO C S NII NIINOIIF T/ST 1 CTMESS bt LO z 1 LNDN TN , 1 S At■I CT 1 to A 0. JOHNSO $t' - / iNrAs IT 1 r ELEMENT N Minty FNWI CcTfl CT J , d FANSES M No om } ~ �+ r M .>. SO/IOC. M NNE CME l f w + f J CAANOLL I MIDDLE 31Fi s *r o d wN.NNON RCN00l ��'►,� � 'I'�E'ifNTF �• ��r 1R� J d< <• tt ■ perN N NE�A}A1rN nEAI►� TA IO i] COYE �� LIVE UNIT CT - � CITY 114 �r FtL L00SE NALL (jS e CN*Ir No R00 71 ■ 1IrYEASNE Q > 2�coLur/us NoefN BICENTENNIAL i ti t ►ADN cD _ -- N■ PPS lla SOOTINLAIK Rrl- ITN NUTRAILERULE �•1-11s+r�r- 11411 FI PINE CT. E ; 1 E ��'e loop.. �r ` ; z t'., c 1J IILAt 1 IY +S. s a g� 1 - ��igr ESCNArGE 0lY0� � < ANNtOw t--s? 1 n MIC IL ONE 0 u I-' > 1n E` ••• /OIAN is CONT11ENuKi, .• = I 'Z' ! u CN71■ENTAL ILND.. E 9' • • mwu • GRAND IfMll /♦O `MENDT �•y•�W • COLLEYVILLE 1° C 15' t 154 wun i 15-5 T oN rat • \uS.%Id EL I h U Ln I X . �•�• r� r w� n � p Rr * r Ina,< I ai ` Z cc w u F to 8 n< Y �� Big SQo g �n Q City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:ZA 90-72 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 01/08/91 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 6 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 12/26/90 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 590 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Dallas, Texas 75248 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (214) 980-5075 Phone: (817) 488-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. 1. Show the record owners' names, deed records and existing zoning' on the property west, southwest, and south within 200 feet of this tract. 2. Label the width and type of easements adjacent to this property. Also delete the word future from the drainage and utility easement and provide a width for this easement. The width for this easement should agree with the easement shown on the drainage study. 3. Provide the owner's name and deed record reference in the first sentence of the legal preamble. Also tie the legal description to a survey corner or existing subdivision corner. 4. There are several bearings and/or distances in the legal description that do not match the boundary. 5. Show the apparent existing R.O.W. and the existing traveled roadway width for Peytonville. 6. Add a 10' U.E. along the north line of Lot 1. 7. Change the wording on the 24' wide easement to 1124' Common Access Easement and Public Utility Easement." 8. Remove the word "underground" from the 20' utility easement. 9. Please show the slope/grading easements along F.M. 1709 which are proposed by the SDHPT. * The 15' building line shown along Peytonville requires all buildings to front on F.M. 1709. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by January 21, 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II 15-10 EEC 1-5-7k r� i City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:ZA 90-72 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 01/29/91 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 6 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 01/29/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 590 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Dallas, Texas 75248 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (214) 980-5075 Phone: (817) 488-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. 1. Provide the owner's name and deed record reference in the first sentence of the legal preamble. Also tie the legal description to a survey corner or existing subdivision corner. * The 15' building line shown along Peytonville requires all buildings to front on F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II 15-8 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 18, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 90-73 Final Plat ZA 90-73 is the Final Plat of Block 6, Lots 1 and 2, SouthRidge Lakes, representing approximately 4.31 acres out of the revised 20.37-acre preliminary plat. The owner of the property is Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. The property is zoned Commercial-3. The intended use of Lot 2 is for a day care facility. No additional notifications were required to be sent. On January 17, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to the staff review comments dated January 8, 1991. Items #3 and #5 regarding the twenty-four foot (241) access and utility easement and the terminology of "underground" utility easement were discussed. These issues were referred to the City Attorney for review. It was determined that no liability would be imposed on the City with the addition of the word "underground" to the utility easement. Regarding the twenty-four foot (24') common access and utility easement, it may be located off Lot 2 as indicated on the plat and will be incorporated in the Final Plat of Lot 3. M KPG 16-1 rpl Nr i ��n':�h'1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/07/90 .. i FINAL PLAT APPLICATION TITLE Of)ffWa 10QV/' /�f' crnyQ�� 1. s oh��sPL'-/ G� :;ln S EADLINE : l% �� G ! '�L% TOTAL LOTS: 2 TOTAL ACRES: WORKS DgP L Zr 96' - 73 APPLICANT OVER (if different) NAME: *yZ40,4ADDRESS: j53p3 ,�j91L,AS�i�heX-G�J/J }�3. .OrT79W I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivisic Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to thiE submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zo CoMmssion and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed reques and addre es issues. Signed: Date: �� For Citt Use Only: I h y acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ Vol- l on this the I— day of ti. 19 =l 1. V Signed: �ra'w^� J Aii'di-fl Title: IP7rvr1' u�/►t-tibu > J The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 an No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATICN On Plan Applic. �- Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 100' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of..." �- Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) r Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed recorc Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shown and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adja this property (Type & Size) Previously approved cor 14 -1 ,s or preliminary plats Adjacent street interse iriwn with street names Final Plat Pg. 2 of 3 Shown Not GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 2/0- (On Plan Applic. W r Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage. Property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes show; Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. All property corners dimensioned to centerline of adjacent streets All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) (Replats Onl; PROPOSED INFORMATION ,i Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned and centerline dimensioned with bearings All curve data labeled (delta, radius, length, tangent) Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1). Street names provided not similar to any existing street names R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order .� Square feet of each lot shown (Chart format O.K. ) Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted l 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general ,perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) 1 Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above Calculated dimensions for all lots, street R.O.W. and centerline, easements, etc. Flood plain limit shown. Floodway shown and labeled with dimensional t Avigation easement shown if applicable (Appendix) ,i Minimum finish floor elevations (No. 483-3.03-D-30) Note also provides'. l (Appendix) Deed Restriction Statement (No. 483-3.05-C)(Amended Plat Only) i Flowage easement note (Appendix 5) Sight triangle note (No. 483-8.02) Driveway access limitation note (No. 483-5.01-H) Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) IG 3 Not Included Included Final Plat Pg. 3 of 3 2/07/90 OTHER REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Complete and corrected water and sewer layout Complete and corrected Preliminary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3.03-D-35) and No. 482 Perc tests for each lot not served by City sewer Certificate of taxes paid from City Tax Collector Certificate of taxes paid from County Tax Collector Certificate of taxed paid from School Tax Collector Any proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions Any proposed Homeowners Agreements and/or documents Developers Agreement (Prior to Construction) 16 -4 n � R ^1 U c i n N nn I U li ' Wu N I d " City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:ZA 90-73 REVIEW NO:ONE DATE OF REVIEW:01/08/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Southridge Lakes, Lots 1, 2, Block 6 Phase C-1 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 12/26/90 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II Levitt Engineers, Inc. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Ste. 590 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Dallas, Texas 75248 Southlake, Tx 76092 Phone: (214) 980-5075 Phone: (817) 488-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. 1. The legal preamble should reference the current warranty deeds for both owners of this property. 2. The owner's dedication should exclude: "... and a 24 foot emergency access and utility easement, ...". 3. The 24' easement should either be shown as an easement on Lot 2 or an easement to be dedicated by separate instruments. If it is included in Lot 2 the area for Lot 2 should be increased and internal dimensions should reflect the inclusion of the easement. 4. Change the wording on the 24' wide easement to 1124' Common Access Easement and Public Utility Easement." 5. Remove the word "underground" from the 20' utility easement. 6. Add a 10' U.E. along the north line of Lot 1. 7. Show the record owner's names and deed records on the property west and south within 200' of this tract. 8. The boundary distance along the north line of Lot 2 should include the 24' wide easement. 9. Add a bearing on the common lot line. 10. The SDHPT shows a slope/grading easement along this property. If this easement will be existing prior to filing this plat, it should be shown on the plat. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider open space requirements, off -site sewer extensions, and off -site grade -to -drain permission. I i 4 City of Southlake, Texas * original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by January 21, 1991. i * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - TT 16-7 FINAL PLAT SOtiTHRIDGE �s S�--------- N Cl T( 5�' 4 20 19 N00'28'00"W C •Y A 4 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT N89'32'O- - E LAKES PHASE C-1 LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 6 N 8Vr32'00" E a r W/r rr � r I rrr 1s rr rr W rr rr / / 1 w� /r OPEN �D O i / r SPACE r/ /r /r /r 3 0.00V 74' EMERGENCY ACCESts to Y tJTIUTY EASEMENT 0 OPENSPACE CD Z o_ CD c LOT 2 41,328 S.F. LET 1 zI c 138,603 S.F. CD (4 N O = fV co Cb W W O W _ co 0 m BLOCK 6C, 0 0 50' B.L. _ 20' UNDERGROUND U11UTY EASEMENT ----------- ------------------ — ------------ 126.00' -------------------------- 360.00' S 89'32'00" W 510.00' F.M. 1709 (SOUTHLAKE BLVD.) 164 City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:ZA 90-73 REVIEW NO:TWO DATE OF REVIEW:01/29/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Southridge Lakes, Lots 1, 2, Block 6 r Phase C-1 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 1 01/29/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGJ�SURVEYOR: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II Levitt Engineers, Inc. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Ste. 590 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Dallas, Texas 75248 Southlake, Tx 76092 Phone: (214) 980-5075 Phone: (817) 488-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. 1. The legal preamble should reference the current warranty deeds for both owners of this property. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider open space requirements, off -site sewer extensions, and off -site grade -to -drain permission. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. - II City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 18, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ------------------------------------------------------------- ZA 90-74 Site Plan: La Petite Academy ZA 90-74 is a request for site plan approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The request is for the proposed Lot 2, Block 6, SouthRidge Lakes, being 0.95 acres. The owner of the property is Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. The applicant is La Petite Academy. They propose building a 6,600 square foot, single -story day care facility. This facility will house one -hundred fifty-five (155) pupils. The property is zoned Commercial-3. There were nine (9) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there has been one (1) written response regarding this site plan approval. Clarence Pinson, 1407 W. Southlake Blvd., was opposed because "the area is residential." Mr. Martinson, 1403 W. Southlake Blvd. expressed concern about the additional traffic that would be generated by this use. Mr. O'Malley, 202 SouthRidge Lakes Parkway, had concerns that the North access easement from SouthRidge Lakes Parkway was not shown on the plat. On January 17, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to the staff review comments dated January 8, 1991, eliminating item #2 (fire lane turnaround) and working with City Staff on a deceleration lane along F.M. 1709. In conversations with Chief Wilson, the applicant's representative indicated that the fifty foot (50') temporary turnaround would pose no problem. No deceleration lane has been incorporated in the latest revision of the site plan. KPG 17-( CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • 2/06/90 SITE PLAN APPLICATION `W OF SITE PLAN: La pe-Fite, ` ca*_wt SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN IS IN: 5601kridne, L4ke-s A" +iom LOT: 2 BLOCK: 6 APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: L , Schw�fz. - CiV i s &*W m,. Airyi day. /J M8 Par�nevs, L.F. --S ADDRESS: 301_�? 9004 , R01-M Towe4r. 5ui+e- 3_50 Zia Las , TX 75201 15303 Pallas P44VAy PHONE: 214 - 720 -601W 1N IIts Te4.a9 75248 I hereby certify that this site plan is in eonf with the re�quir� is of the Zoning ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed reques and address any unresolved issues. Signed: Date: For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the site plan application and the application fee in the amount of $ I SD a' _ on this the 7 Y ' day of _ 19 ? - v I r^a l^ t�1.taJ Stwed: wvl Title: The following checklist is a partial summary of site plan requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Zonim, Crdi once No. 380 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this site plan submittal. Shown Not On Plan Applic. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN Acceptable scale: 1" = 20', 1'= 40', or as approved North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Location Map Appropriate title, i.e. "Site Plan" to include name of development, City, gross acreage and date of preparation Name and address of record owner : Name, address -and phone of person preparing the site plan Metes and bounds labeled on property boundary 4. Existing zoning of this site and all adjacent property IF _ Any proposed zoning shown All R.O.W. and easements on or adjacent to the site labeled _ (type, width) c� Width and type of bufferyards labeled 1� Pedestrian walks, malls, and open areas shown v Location, type and height of all walls, fences, and screening cz devices shown -- Anticipated schedule of development Location and size of points of ingress/egress to the site Location, size, height, type and orientation of signs, lighting, luminaries and exterior auditory speakers All trash dumpsters locate,' Im-Iti-family only) Any necessary drG :'1age stu O _Z :ails cc Y City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 90-74 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 01/08/91 PROJECT NAME: Building Permit Site Plan - La Petite Academy Lot 2, Block 6, Southridge Lakes Addition, Ph. C-1 DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 12/26/90 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER: Arvida/JMP Partners, L.P. - II Civitas Group Rolm Tower, Suite 350 3023 Routh Street 15303 Dallas Parkway Dallas, Texas 75201 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: (214) 720-6090 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. 1. The plat shows a 24' common Access Easement and the site plan shows 30' in width. Also, the easement should include the wording "public utility easement." 2. A paved turnaround having a 50' radius is required at the end of the common drive. 3. Only 30 standard parking stalls are shown, 31 stalls are required. 4. Show location of water service to include size and meter location. 5. The air release valve in the driveway approach should be surrounded by a concrete vault. This water line is to be lowered in the next few months. 6. The proposed SS service should be shown to match the preliminary plans, i.e. no manhole at the service and clean -out at the end of the line. 7. We would prefer a pipe system connecting the parking area drainage to the lake rather than the proposed flume. * A letter from the adjacent owner(s) granting permission for grading, construction of a temporary turnaround and drainage improvements will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. * The SDHPT construction plans for F.M. 1709 show a proposed slope/grading easement along this property. The consultant should confirm any impact of this on the proposed grades. * Water line extension (8" shown on preliminary plans) and new fire hydrant will be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 17-4 City of Southlake, Texas * Off -site easement acquisition and sanitary sewer construction will be the responsibility of the developer. * The applicant should confirm that the water service for the previous Arvida sales office does not encroach in this tract. This water service should be disconnected from the main water line in Southridge Parkway. * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. Proposed improvements within state R.O.W. will require SDHPT approval. * Our records show an existing gas main within the R.O.W. along the frontage of this tract. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 01/21/91 . * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Civitas Group Arvida/JMB Partners 11-5 Im In PARTNERS, L.P. 'ONING (C-3) were --I- 4 (.M& mo w SEE 9w-cr to er161NrF�s, brc. 'KLK:I'ION ). W. TO S.RH.P.T. PROPOSED SITE PLAN LA PETITEACADEMY 0.05 Ac1« LOT i, BLOCK 6 SOUTIIRIDGE LAKES ADDITION u,-.•LLY •1 • PARKIh�i 1" + PLAY GROU" + EIGNAGE . " !1� + BUILDING F:\ + PERCENT OF .. .ail.. ARVIDA/JMB PART CURRENT ZONIr, 1S,��io 6f01W°nlouart MONUFYI•!i' �.'�. ,- 1 ,. t - T- K'at 665 � �dpe •A :pll. J 11 1,7109 1;11 1hl", 131,1-1). ) WAgE9f FUSE ► j r: SOUTHKIME LAKES 1 -- —MFt City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 90-74 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 01/29/91 PROJECT NAME: Building Permit Site Plan - La Petite Academy r Lot 2, Block 6, Southridge Lakes Addition, Ph. C-1 DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Arvida/JMP Partners, L.P. - II Rolm Tower, Suite 350 15303 Dallas Parkway Dallas, Texas 75248 O1/24/91 ENG/PLANNER: Civitas Grou 3023 Routh Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone: (214) 720-6090 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. -------------------------------------------- 1. A paved turnaround having a 50' radius is required at the end of the common drive. 2. The proposed SS service should be shown to match the preliminary plans. 3. The P & Z has recommended and staff concurs with a requirement for a deceleration lane for this drive location. This should be discussed with staff and shown on the site plan. * A letter from the adjacent owner(s) granting permission for grading, construction of a temporary turnaround and drainage improvements will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. A permanent 15' drainage and utility easement will be required prior to construction of the storm drain off -site to the east. * The SDHPT construction plans for F.M. 1709 show a proposed slope/grading easement along this property. The consultant should confirm any impact of this on the proposed grades. * Water line extension (8" shown on preliminary plans) and new fire hydrant will be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. * Off -site easement acquisition and sanitary sewer construction will be the responsibility of the developer. * The applicant should confirm that the water service for the previous Arvida sales office does not encroach in this tract. This water service should be disconnected from the main water line in Southridge Parkway. * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. Proposed improvements within state R.O.W. will require SDHPT approval. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Civitas Group 17- 7 Arvida/JMB Partners El I I v ILLISTRATION OF FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SPAAACAMa 5-Mecor Tempe" CuUt:sAc. opt THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WITH AND WITHOUT A TEMPORARY TURN AROUND OF ASPHALT AS THEY CURRENTLY EXIST WITHIN THE CITY. THESE EXAMPLES ARE FROM PHASE I AND II OF CHIMNEY HILLS ADDITION. THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE REASON FOR ONE EXISTING COMPARED TO THE OTHER NOT EXISTING, IS THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE AND SECTION 10.207 (h) TURNAROUNDS, AS FOUND IN THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE (1988) . M E M O R A N D U M February S, 1991 TO: Curtis Hawk:, City Manager FROM: Don Wilson, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fire Lanes for La Petite -Academy From a recent conversation with Mr. nary Schmitz representing La Petite Academy, the question of the changes stated and agreed upon in conversation in reference t: � fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) may came up In conversation with the City Council tonight. Provided are comments and photocopies of the existing fire lines as requested by the Fire Services. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS FORDS UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1988, SECTION 10.207 SELTION 10.207 (f) SURFACE. Fire apparatus access reads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed leads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a Surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. DEFINITION OF ALL WEATHER SURFACE = A dust free surface constructed of cement, asphalt, brick or ether commonly accepted pavement which may be approved by the Administrative Official. REi_OMMENDATION - The Fire Services has been recommending that the all weather surface be constructed of 2" asphalt over a E" base when the cul-de-sac is t� � be of the temporary nature. (Please see phcetc-graphs/phietc-copies provided from Chimney Hills Addition, phases I and II) SECTION 1C_?.2C)7 (h) TURNAROUNDS. All dead-end fire apparatus access reads in excess of 130 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. RECOMMENDATION - The Fire Service recommendation has been that the turnaround have a turning radius of no less than fifty (5o). This will allow all apparatus to have proper egress in and out of an area. ILLISTRATION OF FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WITH AND WITHOUT A TEMPORARY TURN AROUND OF ASPHALT AS THEY CURRENTLY EXIST WITHIN THE CITY. THESE EXAMPLES ARE FROM PHASE I AND II OF CHIMNEY HILLS ADDITION. THE MA. 0 . DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE REASON FORONE EXISTING COMPARED TO THE OTHER NOT EXISTING, IS THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE AND SECTION 10.201 (h) TURNAROUNDS, AS FOUND IN THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-C Attached please find final recommendation ordinance revisions the Planning and to approve (6-0) per Ordinance No. Zoning Commission's the proposed zoning 480-C. The Commission concurred with all the suggested changes per Staff's worksession with Councilpersons Wilhelm and Hall on December 10, 1990 with the following exceptions: In Section 33.4 and 34.1 (y), they suggested that temporary buildings be allowed at the developer's discretion because he would not allow an excessive number of these structures and would ensure that their appearance would be compatible with the development. They further suggested revisions to the maximum lot coverage in the RE, SF-lA, SF-301 SF-20A, and residential PUD zoning districts. These changes are denoted by (++). The P & Z made additional changes to the 0-1, C-1, C-21 and S-P-2 district regulations regarding development site plans for building permits. They suggested that all requests for building permits be reviewed by P & Z and City Council except requests in the O-1 and 0-2 districts. These were the only two districts to be reviewed administratively. The Council may wish to reconsider the P & Z's recommendation regarding C-1 and C-2 requests due to the increasingasagenda items requiring their attention and thicreed Staftmeneededtoprepareeach site plan for public presentation. W- KPG CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONI O INANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING SECTION 4, DEFINITIONS" TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 6, "NON -CONFORMING USES" BY RE -DEFINING THE TITLE TO THIS SECTION TO INCORPORATE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS; BY AMENDING SECTION 20 "C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT"; SECTION 24 "B-1 BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT"; SECTION 25 "B-2 COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT"; SECTION 26, "I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT"; SECTION 29, "MH MANUFACTURING HOUSING DISTRICT", BY AMENDING PERMITTED USES WITHIN THESE DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33, "SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS"; BY ADDING ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS AND DELETING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE SECTION AND BY FURTHER INCORPORATING ORDINANCE NO. 514 INTO SAID SECTION BY SPECIFIC REFERENCE; BY AMENDING SECTION 35 "OFF-STREET PARKING"•, BY AMENDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID SECTION TO FURTHER CLARIFY THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF SAID SECTION; BY AMENDING SECTION 40 "SITE PLANS"; BY AMENDING THE LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN VARIOUS SECTIONS RELATIVE TO REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLANS AND THE CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF VARIOUS PLAN SUBMITTALS; BY AMENDING SECTION 41 BY ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONTAINED ON CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTALS; BY AMENDING SECTION 43 " AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE" BY CREATING A NEW SUBSECTION IN THE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ZONE SECTION INCORPORATING ORDINANCE NO. 479; BY AMENDING SECTION 44 "BOARD OF ,ADJUSTMENTS"; BY ADDING CS TO OUTSIDE STORAGE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS USE SECTION; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. j i Ig -IA SECTION 4: Definitions 4.2 The following changes are recommended in the definition section: * Kennel - Any lot or premises on which, in the aggregate, four (4) or more dogs, cats, or other domestic animals at least four (4) months of age are housed or accepted for boarding, trimming, grooming and/or bathing. (This will limit domestic animals to four total.) Lot Measurements - C. Width - To be changed to read: Width of lot shall mean the distance between the side property lines measured at the front building line. Reversed Frontage - Change to read: Reversed frontage is a lot which has setback lines on both streets equal to the front setback line as required by the Zoning Ordinance unless such lots align back-to-back which would allow both lots to show a side yard setback along the side street. Specific Use Permit - Add to definitions - a permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and authorized by the City Council for the use of land or structure in accordance to the provisions in Section 45. SECTION 6: Nonconforming Uses 6.8 Add Specific Use Permits to the title of this section. Will read: Special Exception Uses and Specific Use Permits: Not Nonconforming Uses. In the text of the section, substitute "specific" for "special" use permit. * SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES: In Sections 8.4, 9.4, 10.4, 11.4, 13.4, 14.4, 16.4, 17.4, 18.4, 20.4, 21.4, 22.4, 23.4, 25.4, 26.4, 27.4, 28.4, and 29.4, amend to read: * "Special Exception Uses may be approved by the City Council as specifically authorized by Section 37 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all applicable conditions required in Section 37, together with such other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. Section 37, which had previously been reserved for future expansion, will be utilized for Special Exception 1 g' ;?J Uses. SECTION 10: "RE" Single Family Residential District ++ 10.5(e) "Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the total allowed lot area." SECTION 11: "SF-lA Single Family Residential District ++ 11.5(e) "Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the total allowed lot area." SECTION 13: "SF-30 Single Family Residential District" ++ 13.5(e) "Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the total allowed lot area." SECTION 14: "SF 20 A" Single Family Residential District ++ 14.5(e) "Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the total allowed lot area." SECTION 18: "O-1" Office District ++ 18.6 Create a new section 18.6 entitled "Development Site Plan" to read: "Administrative approval of a development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40.3 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the 0-1 district." (This will be applicable to the Office-2 district also.) SECTION 20: 11C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District 20.2(a) In the Commercial-1, Commercial Uses section: 1. Delete "Architects office". Substitute "Offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including fabrication, manufacture, or production of goods or manufacture." * 5. Delete "Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores. Such use may contain a small car wash facility, but may not include fender or body repairs, mechanical services, rear -end, transmission or engine overhaul." (This (W will be incorporated into the "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District.) * 20.5(f) In 11C-1" Floor Area Section, delete the following: "Excepted from the minimum floor area requirements of this provision are small grocery or convenience stores, and car washing structures, that operate in conjunction with filling stations, The minimum size of a separate building housing such a store or car wash facility shall be five hundred (500) square feet. It is envisioned that such stores will be surrounded by a larger canopy covering for the gasoline pumps, and that the total area under roof shall be more than two thousand (2,000) square feet." ++ 20.6 Create a new section 20.6 entitled "Development Site Plan" to read: "A development site plan shall be required for a building permit within the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. This site plan shall be prepared in accordance to Section 40.3 of this ordinance. SECTION 21: 11C-2" Local Retail Commercial District 21.2 #21 Amend to read: * "Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. Such use may offer gasoline, oil, greasing and accessories, and may contain a small car wash facility, but may not include fender or body repairs, mechanical services, rear -end, transmission or engine overhaul." ++ 21.6 Create a new section 21.6 entitled "Development Site Plan" to read: "A development site plan shall be required for a building permit within the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District. This site plan shall be prepared in accordance with Section 40.3 of this ordinance. SECTION 22: 11C-3" General Commercial District ++22.6 Delete "In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 40.3 of this ordinance, the development site plan shall provide as much detail as possible, including, but not limited to: . . ." (to the end of this section. The requirements (a. through g.) will be incorporated into section 40 as standard language. ++22.6 Substitute the following language: A development site plan shall be required for a building permit within the C-3 General Commercial District. The site plan shall be prepared in accordance to Section 40.3 of this ordinance." THIS SAME REVISION IS PROPOSED IN SECTIONS 23.6 (C-4), 24.6 (B-1), 25.6 (B-2), 26.6 (I-1), and 27.6 (I-2). SECTION 23: 11C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District * 23.5 (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) be amended to read as the 11C-3" district regulations regarding Front Yard, Side Yard, Rear Yard Maximum Lot Coverage and Floor Area. SECTION 24: 11B-1" Business Service Park District 24.2(a) In the B-1 Business Service Park District, Office and Commercial Uses section: 15. Add landscaping companies to the nursery yards use to read: "Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies, provided that incidental equipment and supplies are primarily stored within a building or enclosed within a screening device. Nursery products themselves may be grown, raised, stored and marketed outdoors. The outdoor storage and sale of nursery products shall be exempt from all other outdoor storage and screening requirements contained within this ordinance. These products are established as an exception to all other outdoor storage and screening requirements as by their very nature they assist in meeting the landscaping, screening, buffering, and open space goals of the City." * 24.5 (e) "As "Maximum Lot Coverage" Amend to read: a recommendation Commission and by approval of the City Council the Planning and Zoni pursuant to Site Plan Review with requirements to be established based upon an analysis of the location, configuration, environmental impact and compatibility of this project land uses." SECTION 25: "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District 25.2(a) In the B-2 Commercial Manufacturing District, Commercial Uses section: 14. Add landscaping companies to Nursery yards as #15 above. * 25.5 (e) "Maximum Lot Coverage" Amend to read as 24.5 (e) above. SECTION 26: 11I-1" Light Industrial District 26.2 (b) In the I-1 Light Industrial, Industrial Uses section: Add 16(a), to read: Farrier (horseshoeing) 4 * 26.5 (e) "Maximum Lot Coverage" Amend to read as 24.5 (e). ++ 26.5 (h) Amend to read: "All business shall be conducted entirely within a building unless outside storage is approved as a Special Exception Use, development site plan, S-P-1 or S-P-2 zoning districts." SECTION 27: 11I-2" Heavy Industrial District * 27.5 (e) Maximum Lot Coverage amended as 24.5 (3) above. SECTION 29: "MH" Manufactured Housing District 29.2(a) In the "MH" Manufacturing Housing district, leave the residential uses as listed. SECTION 30: "PUD" Planned Unit Development District ++ 30.5 Amend District Regulations to read: "The height, setback area, floor space, and other development regulations for permissible uses in a PUD district shall conform to the development regulations which would be applicable to such uses if the same were situated in the most restrictive district in which such uses are permitted. However, the City Council may approve more flexible development standards if other design features provide adequate protection to surrounding and adjacent properties. For any residential PUD, the maximum density permitted shall be equal to the maximum density permitted under the least restrictive single family zoning district at the time the is granted. In any residential PUD, all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total_ of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the total allowed lot area." 30.6 (c) Change reference to Section 35 regarding parking. 30.10 Change to 30.09. This section was incorrectly numbered previously. SECTION 32: "S-P-2" (Generalized) Site Plan District Regulations ++ Create a new section 32.6 entitled "Development Site Plan" to read: "A development site plan shall be required for a building permit within the S-P-2 General Site Plan District per the requirements in Section 40.3." SECTION 33: Supplementary District Regulations 33.2(a) In the Supplementary Regulations District, the Fences - at Intersections section should read: 11-6 a. "At Intersections - On a corner lot in any district, nothing shall be erected, placed, planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to naturally impede vision between a height of two (2) feet and ten (10) feet above the centerline grades along each R.O.W. line for a distance of ten (10) feet by forty (40) feet. (see attached exhibit). * 33.4 Delete this entire section. Ordinance No. 480-B addressed the issue of temporary buildings as accessory uses in new developments. ++ P & Z would like to suggest that the City Council reconsider the Commission's first recommendation that the developer be responsible for limiting the number of temporary buildings for the development. They felt that it would be "self-regulating" because the developer would not allow an excessive number of these structures and would ensure the quality and appearance of them as well. 33.8 In the Appendices section of the Supplementary Regulation District, delete reference to the following ordinances: a. Site Plans (Has been incorporated into Section 40) C. Highway, Farm -to -Market Road and Thoroughfare setbacks (Has been incorporated into Section 33.9 f.) i. Airport Zoning Ordinance (Incorporate Ordinance No. 479 - Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance into Section 43). j. Mobile Home Park Regulation Ordinance (Has been incorporated into Section 29). k. Site preparation and excavation ordinances (Regulated by the Uniform Building Code) In the Appendices section of the Supplementary Regulation District, add reference to the following ordinances: Drainage Ordinance No. 482 Perimeter Street Ordinance No. 494 Sewer Pro Rata Ordinance No. 493 33.14 Incorporate Ordinance No. 514 into the section entitled Health Regulations: Sewage Disposal. SECTION 34: Accessory Uses 34.1(f) Add ordinance reference regarding pool fencing requirements in the first paragraph of this section, to read: "Private swimming pool, wading pools, and game courts (lighted and unlighted), provided that if lighted, the lighting shall be so directed and shielded so as not to shine directly on any adjacent residential property; and further provided that any such pool or game court is for the private use of the site occupants and their guests, and not operated as a business. All "at grade" swimming pools with a water depth greater than twenty-four (24) inches and "above grade" swimming pools /9-7 having a water depth twenty-four (24) inches or more, except for portable tot pools, shall be enclosed by a fence and gate of a height so designated by Ordinance 481 as well as the Uniform Building Code (whichever is the most restrictive) of such material and design to discourage unauthorized entry to the facility. Ornamental pools or ponds designed for decorative purposes and having a depth less than twenty-four (24) inches are not subject to a special fencing requirement and may be located within required front or rear yards provided that they maintain a minimum ten foot (10') setback from the closest property line." Amend the second paragraph referencing pools to read: "All other pool(s) may be located in a side or rear yard, but not within a front yard, and shall not be located closer than five (5) feet to any side or rear property line nor be located any closer than five feet (5') to another structure." SECTION 35: Off -Street Parking 35.5(a) In the "Rules for the Computation of the Number of Parking Spaces", amend this section to read: "Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be construed to be the next highest whole number." 35.6(b)(6) In the office, professional or financial uses section regarding parking, amend it to read: "Office, Professional or Financial Uses: (For all categories listed under this heading, a minimum of eight spaces shall be provided for the first 1000 sq. ft.. The following requirements pertain to the remaining square footage:" 35.6(b)(10) In the industrial uses section regarding parking, amend it to read: "Industrial Uses: One (1) off-street parking space required per 1000 square feet of under -roof industrial area and one (1) space per each 300 square feet of under -roof office area. / f_9 SECTION 37 SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES 37.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS - The uses listed in this section are prohibited in the City of Southlake unless and until a special exception use permit is granted for such use by the City Council in accordance with the following requirements and procedures: (1) A written application for a special exception shall be submitted and shall be accompanied by a site plan prepared in accordance with Section 40.3 of this ordinance. The site plan shall be reviewed per the requirements of Section 40.4. (2) Fifteen (15) days notice of the public hearing shall be given in accordance with the procedures used in zoning cases. (3) No special exception shall be granted unless the City Council finds that the requested exception is specifically permitted by this ordinance; that the location of the proposed activities and improvements are clearly defined on the site plan; and that the special exception is wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties either as filed or subject to such limitations and requirements as the City Council deems to be necessary to protect adjacent properties. 37.2 AUTHORIZED SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS - The following special exceptions may be permitted by the City Council in the district specified, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in this section, together with such other conditions as the City Council may impose: SPECIAL EXCEPTION a. Churches, synagogues, temples and other similar facilities for worship, fellowship and education, subject to the following conditions: C��i ty C�ounu I 1. The Rear shall impose such reasonable conditions as it deems necessary to protect the residential neighborhoods, in so far as practicable, from--- the detrimental effects of noise, traffic, fire, etc. and to protect the character of the neighborhood and the value of surrounding properties; 1Y-9 AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-lB, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, MF-2 2. In granting or denying such application, the aeard-shall consider such items as the total land area to be devoted to the religious use, the size of the church structures and the congregation, the frequency of church services, other activities which take place on the premises, and the suitability of the property for residential use. C'+ Coinci 1 The shall consider all effects of such a facility, both beneficial and detrimental, and shall deny such application when the detrimental effects substantially outweigh the beneficial effects. 3. Children's nurseries, child day care centers, and kindergartens may be approved as a part of the main or accessory religious building provided exterior instructional or play areas are suitably fenced from any adjacent street, parking area or property. b. Public, semi-public and parochial/ private schools, not including correctional institutions or trade schools. C. Public, semi-public and private golf courses together with related clubhouse, pro -shop and maintenance/ storage buildings, provided no building is closer than one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining side or rear property lines or closer than fifty (50) feet to a public street right-of-way line. d. Temporary roadside stands for the seasonal sale of fruit, vegetables, and produce raised or grown on the premises, provided that any such stand shall be set back not less than fifteen (15) feet from the adjacent street right-of-way and adjacent property lines, and further provided said stand shall be removed when the seasonal use shall cease. All except B-1, CS, HC, I-1 and I-2 AG, RE, SF-lA, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, Imo'-1, MF-2 and B-2 AG e. Equestrian riding stables, tack rooms, show rings, and rodeo grounds, either private or when operated as a business, provided adequate measures are employed to prevent health hazards to humans or animals, and adequate controls are used so as not to create offensive nuisances or odors. f. Dude ranches catering to temporary guests housed on the premises g. Colleges, junior colleges, or other similar institutions of higher learning, whether public or private, when located on a site of at least twenty (20) acres, and provided such facilities have direct access to a major thoroughfare street or highway and further provided that buildings and intensive use outdoor facilities are set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from all property lines. h. Airports, aviation field or aircraft landing areas. i. Marina or yacht club, whether private or public. j. Community centers and service clubs dedicated to social or recreational activities serving the City or neighborhood thereof. Such buildings and facilities shall be set back at least thirty (30) feet from all side and rear property lines and forty (40) feet from any street line. The total ground floor area of all such buildings and structures shall not cover more than twenty-five (25) percent of the site area devoted to such facilities and activities. N-11 AG, I-2 AG All except CS, I-1 and I-2 C-3 AG AG, RE, SF -IA, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1 and MF-2 k. Athletic stadiums, public private, when located adjacent to thoroughfare or collector street. 1. Fish hatcheries and fish farms. or AG, RE, SF-1A, a SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, and MF-2 M. Public governmental buildings including community health centers and recreation buildings, libraries, museums, postal stations, and administrative offices of federal or state government. n. Servants or family quarters for domestic servants employed on the premises or family members of the owner of the premises and shall not be rented or otherwise used as a separate domicile provided the gross inhabitable square footage of the floor area shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. Such quarters may be housed within the principal residential dwelling, above a residential garage, or be part of an accessory building on the same premises, and shall comply with minimum standards for light, health, safety and occupancy in conformance with other applicable City Codes and Ordinances. If the quarters exist as a separate accessory building to the principal dwelling, such quarters must be located at a distance of at least thirty ' (30) feet behind the principal dwelling, or not be visible from the street; in addition, such quarters must share a common street access with the principal dwelling. All utilities must be on the same meter as the principal dwelling. A separate septic system from the principal dwelling is required if the quarters are housed other than in the principal dwelling. AG, I-2 AG, RE, SF-lA, SF-1B, SF-30 o. Temporary real estate sales All office, including manufactured housing, to be located on property being sold for a period of sale exceeding two (2) years. p. Sales and service of new auto- C-41 I-1 mobiles, trucks, or motorhomes. q. Sales and service of used auto- I-1 mobiles, trucks, or motorhomes. r. Medical care facilities: nursing CS, C-1, C-2 and care homes, hospitals, with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal services used, operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and virvitors--when located on a site of not less than five (5) acres. s. Helistop. CS, HC, 0-1, 0-2, I-1, I-2, 8-2 t. Cemetery Uses. CS 1. Application. An application for a cemetery use must be in writing and shall include: (a) Name and address of applicant. (b) Location and legal description of proposed cemetery -land. (c) Complete plan in conformity with the requirements of Development Plan herein provided. (d) Preliminary specifica- tions of all buildings, improvements, utility installations. and other facilities to be constructed on or under the land proposed for zoning change. (e) Such further reasonable information as may be required by the Board of *dju.S.—Ment. ClFy CcL)ncil f-13 2. Development Plan - The cemetery shall conform to the following minimum requirements: (a) It shall be located on a well drained site, properly graded to insure rapid draining and freedom from stagnant pools of water. (b) All walkways and driveways within a cemetery shall be all weather, hard -surfaced. (c) When a public or community sewer system is available, sewer connections shall be installed as required by the local plumbing code. If the cemetery is not to be served immediately by a 'sewage collection system connected to a community treatment plant or to a public sewage facility, the occupancy of any building, residence or other structure shall be restricted until a septic tank and subsurface drainage field designed and constructed in accordance with methods and standards approved by the State Department of Health and the local plumbing code have been installed, inspected and approved by the City. If the permitted use is not to be served immediately by a water utility, occupancy shall be prohibited until water satisfactory for human consumption is available from a source on the land, or a public utility source, in adequate and sufficient supply for human use and operation of a septic tank and system. Individual water supplies must be in conformity to the local plumbing code. (d) All cemeteries must qualify and be maintained as a perpetual care center as provided in Article 912a, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, and any other applicable state laws. IY-1`- (e) The cemetery must comply with all building codes, including but not limited to plumbing, electrical, street, and general codes of the City of Southlake, Texas, or other applicable governmental authority. ( f ) All use of the surface land or underground, or buildings or structures of any type shall comply with all applicable City, County, State, Federal or other governmental agency requirements as to health, sanitation, ventilation, pollution and associated matters. 3. Location - Any cemetery, or any portion of land designated for the use thereof, shall comply with the -.-- following minimum requirements as to location: (a) It shall conform to distance requirements of 912a-24, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, and such minimum distances shall be measured from the nearest city limit point of any city or cities (other than the City of Southlake, Texas) to the boundary of said cemetery land nearest to the city limit of the other city by direct line measurement. (b) It shall be located not less than five hundred (500) feet from any residence or structure used for living purposes or any well, creek, lake, tank, reservoir or pond, or other such water source or place of storage, passage, or drainage. / P- 15 4. Parking - All parking shall be off-street parking with an all- weather surface located in the rear or side yard next to buildings. There shall be one (1) parking space for each four (4) seats in any assembly portion of any building or structure. 5. Screening and Fencing a. All land actually used for buildings and/or burial spaces shall be completely enclosed in a fence with gates capable of being locked to prevent trespassers from entering said premises. b. Any additional fencing, screening, walls, landscaping, or ornamental planting shall be installed. if deemed necessary by the Ber—Gf— City Counct in relation to the property itself or in relation to any adjoining property. cltj CuQncll U. The may 0-1, 0-21 I-1 authorize the establishment of retail operations in an amount exceeding fifteen (15) percent of the net square footage of any one office structure if said increase is the consolidation of retail space from a number of different office structures under common ownership for the purpose of achieving efficiency of use and cost economies. An example of this use would be found in a business park which might contain five separate office structures. A cafeteria or food service establishment to service all five structures might be located in one central structure under the common control, direction or plan of a common ownership and management group. The Zoning a c€ Adjustment shall be authorized to grant special exceptions to allow the consolidation of the fifteen (15) percent retail support sales activity, provided that the fifteen (15) percent maximum usage for retail sales limitation shall be maintained throughout an overall common project. V. The erection and maintenance of antennas, satellite dishes, telecommunication facilities or towers in excess of maximum height regulations for this district where such structures are related to principal permitted uses occupying the structures to which they are attached or affixed. W. Day nurseries or equivalent childcare facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex. If the Board of hd' should choose to grant a special exception use for this activity, the activity shall not be subject to or included within the fifteen (15) percent calculation for supporting retail services as outlined for other supporting retail activities. X. The location of day nurseries or similar childcare activities, if said activity is clearly designed to support neighborhood requirements in the residential areas lying in close proximity to the specific use site. y. Studios designed for the practice, education or training in art, dance, music, drama, photo, or interior design. 1Y-17 All O-2, B-1 C%*y Council C4CN C-1 z. Outdoor storage of plants or other greenery if conducted as a portion of the retail operations of another principal use permitted within this district. This specific special exception is designed to permit the C,} yRoard ef Adjustment to allow limited Counu ( outdoor garden sales activity in conjunction with traditional retail operations subject to the establishment of safeguards deemed necessary and appropriate to protect adjoining properties. In granting a special exception for this activity, the Boar' of is authorized to set out specialized buffering, screening, design and signage requirements to ensure that the outdoor storage, display and sale is totally compatible with the specific site and all surrounding land uses. as. The Zoning Bsa-d Gf "dj^stme may permit the construction of residential units if they are constructed as a portion of a mixed use development within a single structure. This specific provision is designed and intended to allow the construction of studio or loft -type apartments or condominium living units on the floor or floors above office and retail -type activities situated on a ground floor. bb. A residential unit(s) for the exclusive use of an employee or employees of the principal use, placed upon the site when such employee(s) will be fulfilling the duties of night watchman or caretaker for the site. In approving the construction of a residential u it under this provision, the Jadma=d c'' may establish such terms and conditions as it deems necessary to protect the interest of the community at large, the business applicant and the future occupant of the residential structure. JY" /J C-2, C-3, C-4 and B-2 CiI Cour�uI C-3 B-2, I-1 cc. Rifle and pistol ranges. B-2 dd. Private airfields and aircraft CS, AG, C-3 landing area. ee. veterinary clinics for large I-11 I-2 animal care, to include such restrictions as the Boardc`deems necessary for protecting adjacent properties from negative environmental impacts. ff. The construction of accessory AG, MF-1, MF-2, buildings or structures of a size or SF-lA, SF-1B, aggregate size greater than that SF-30, SF-20A, permitted under the accessory building SF-20B requirements of the zoning district in which the property lies. gg. Paper or metal processing and I-2 storage. hh. Gravel crushing, screening and I-2 washing. ii. Dyecasting manufacture. I-2 jj. Concrete batching or transient ALL mix plant. kk. Concrete products manufacturing. I-2 11. Boiler making, repairing and I-2 boiler work. mm. Asphalt storage, liquid or solid. I-2 nn. Meat processing plants. I-2 oo. Golf driving range. AG, C-3, C-4, I-1, I-2 1y-I9 pp. Petroleum Operations. The C'_OlrIg- ( `I-2 -Board of Adj-uctment_may grant this use as a special exception, subject to compliance with the following provisions: 1. In granting or denying a use in this category, the Zoning Beard of City Council Ad4ustaeat must bear in mind that these sites are not to be located contiguous to residentially zoned properties and should be located in such a manner as to preclude the necessity to travel through residentially zoned areas to reach these sites. Petroleum operations should never be placed in an environmentally sensitive area and should be allocated only to those areas appropriately supported by.-.'. Public utility infrastructure and major arterial thoroughfares. Environmental impacts of this use should be carefully considered in determining whether to grant or deny an application. FF CJ CcunLli 2. T h e - Z on MCI -$ a apd--- - -Adjustment-may permit the following uses within this category. a. On -site storage of petroleum products. b. Pipe line transfer or servicing operations relating to the delivery of petroleum based products. C. Petroleum distribution points of a wholesale nature designed to allow the loading or off-loading of truck facilities in a non -retail setting. d. Petroleum blending operations. e. Any or all other petroleum related uses which in the opinion of the Zoning Board oa' Gay Counc; I --Adjustment appear to be in character with the permitted uses for this dis- trict. If- )0 3. No special exception shall be granted unless a developmental site plan as set forth in Section 27.6 is submitted to, and approved by, the nm4 g Baird Of Adjustment. C,+y C,unct I C1 i COunc1I qq • The Zeing of Adjustment may authorize a waiver of the solid wall screen requirement for outdoor storage, only when such outdoor storage abuts a lot or tract zoned AG, and only when there is no residence on such lot or tract within five hundred (500) feet of the storage area. The Cli-y CounclI s Zenng Beard of adjustment, has no authority to waive Section 38 Screening Requirements where the outdoor storage abuts properly zoned residential. The applicant requesting a. waiver of screening requirements must submit a map to the City C o o n c, t l off Adjustment -showing that the outside storage area is so situated that it will not be an eyesore, and is sufficiently distanced from any residences. rr. Community Health Centers. ss. Rodeo Grounds. tt. Outside storage, subject to the requirements of Section 38. A site plan is required. uu. Non-commercial radio and television receiving antennae and non- commercial radio transmitting antennae limited in height to sixty (60) feet (measured from the ground line in front of the dwelling or use facing a public street), and further provided no electrical, radio or television signal interference is created which would adversely affect such signals, whether audio or visual, to nearby dwellings and other permitted uses. Lny- and all television satellite dishes shall be installed in the required rear yard in such a manner as to reduce or eliminate their visibility from all public rights -of - way. U -)l All AG, I-2 I-11 CS AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, MF-2 Add the following Special Exception Uses to this section: VV. Accessory buildings located in the front yard. Allowed in the SF-lA, SF-lB, and RE districts. ww. In -home Day Care per state regulations. Allowed in RE, SF-lA, SF-lB, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B. xx. Add In -home Swimming Lessons. Allowed in RE, SF-lA, SF-lB, SF-30, SF-20A, and SF-20B. yy. Add Gasoline filling station in conjunction with a convenience store. Allowed in C-1. I zz, Revised 01/10/91 SECTION 40 SITE PLANS 40.1 GENERAL - Whenever site plan approval is required by this or other ordinances, such site plan shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of this section. 40.2 APPLICATION- A written application for site plan approval shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator on forms prepared by the City. The application shall be signed by the owner, lessee, developer or option holder of the property and shall be accompanied by (a) a reproducible drawing and copies as required by the Zoning Administrator; and (b) a copy of the plat where the proposed site is located. 40.3 SITE PLAN INFORMATION REQUIRED - For purposes of determining the exact information required on each site plan, refer to the following chart summary of those districts requiring preparation of a site plan. Zoning District Name Section Symbol Residential P.U.D. Development Site Plan 30.8 (RPUD) Non -Residential P.U.D. Development Site Plan 30.8 (MXPUD)* Detailed Site Plan District 31.4 (SP1) Generalized Site Plan District 32.4 (SP2) Special Exception Use 37.0 (SEU) Specific Use Permit 45.2 (SUP) Required for a building permit N/A (BP) Required in all plans N/A (All) * Requirements listed for MXPUD do not apply to any single family portions of the PUD unless noted on the item. A Residential P.U.D. is a development proposal in which ninety percent (90%) or more of the development proposed consists of single family residential or duplex districts. All other P.U.D. development proposals not meeting the criteria of single family residential districts shall fall under the category of a mixed use development site plan. The following criteria is a comprehensive list of site plan requirements. At the end of each criteria is a symbol corresponding to the symbols shown above for each of the referenced districts. If this symbol is shown then this criteria is required on all site plans in that district. a. Acceptable scale: 1"=201, 1"=401, 1"-100, or as approved. North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. (All) b. Small scale location map shown. (All) I f- 43 C. Title includes appropriate title, (i.e. "Site Plan," "Development Site Plan," etc.), name of development or platted lot and block designation, City, County and State, date of preparation. (All) d. Name and address of owner. (All) e. Name, address and phone of firm preparing the Site Plan. (All) f. Metes and bounds labeled on property boundary. (All) g. R.O.W. on or adjacent to the site labeled and dimensioned. (All) h. Adjacent property labeled with owner's name, existing zoning, land use map designation. (All) i. The width and type of proposed bufferyard must be labeled. (All) j. Designation of the location and size of all points of ingress/egress to the site. (All) k. All pedestrian walks, malls and open areas for use by tenants or the public. (All) 1. The location, type and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices. (All) M. Site Data Summary Chart (by phase and in total) to include the following items: - Existing zoning of this tract and any proposed zoning. (All) - Gross acreage and net acreage of the project. (All) - Number of proposed lots. (RPUD, MXPUD including residential) - Residential density. (RPUD, MXPUD including residential) - Percentage of site coverage. (MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, BP, SEU) - Anticipated schedule of development. (All except BP) - Parking spaces required and provided. (MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, BP, SEU) - Area of open space (All) - Open space as a percentage (All) - Outside storage as a percentage (All) n. Show the following related to existing or proposed buildings: - Location, dimensions, max. height, number of stories, use or uses contained therein, gross floor area. (All except RPUD) - Square footage broken down by use. (SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) )Y-.I f - Entrances and exits to buildings. (BP) - Architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures, noting whether or not the facades meet the masonry ordinance requirements. (SP1, SUP, BP, SEU), - Distance between buildings and distance from building to property lines. (All) o. Related to parking requirements: - Clear designation of all parking stalls intended.for off-street parking and for off-street loading. (All) - Dimensions of such parking and loading areas. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) - Type of surface material. (BP, SEU) - Any intended lighting shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) P. Front building lines shown. (All) Rear and side building lines shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, BP, SEU) q. Location, size, height, type and orientation of signs, lighting luminaries and exterior auditory speakers. The applicant shall also provide representative renderings of the particular sign types, facings, material compositions and colors. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) r. The location of all on -site facilities for liquid and solid waste temporary storage pending disposal or any proposed septic fields. (MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, BP, SEU) S. Location of all trash dumpsters. (MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, BP, SEU) t. The types of surfacing, such as paving (for example, asphalt, concrete, brick), turfing or gravel, to be used at the various locations. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) U. Easements on or adjacent to the site labeled and dimensioned. (SP1, SEU, SUP, BP, RPUD and MXPUD if they impact the development) V. Nearest fire hydrant dimensioned to property corner and any proposed hydrants shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP, SEU) W. The fire lane width (20' Lane) must be designated with all curb radii adjacent to the fire lane labeled (min. 25' radius). (BP, MXPUD, SP1, SP2, SUP, SEU) X. The proposed finished grade of the site, shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Included must be directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. (BP) I J y. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information shown. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. (BP) Z. A summary chart showing all, proposed variances to the closet zoning district in which the proposed use(s) would be allowed. This should show the referenced zoning district, the existing requirements and the proposed variance. (RPUD, MXPUD including residential, SP1, SP2) aa. Intended category of uses labeled. (All) bb. Show any areas intended for outside storage and method of screening. (All) cc. A plan showing the arrangement, location and composition of all landscaped areas required under other provision of this ordinance. (BP) dd. A table of performance standards if deemed necessary by the Administrative Official because of the characteristics of the activities to be conducted on the site. (BP) 40.4 REVIEW OF SITE PLAN a. Unless otherwise provided in this ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the site plan at a public hearing as required by this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make its report and recommendation to the City Council and shall recommend such conditions and restrictions as necessary to secure and protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. b. In granting or denying an application for a site plan approval, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall take into consideration the following factors: 1. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding the site. 2. Safety from fire hazards, and measures of fire control. 3. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage. 4. Noise producing elements, and glare of vehicular and stationary lights and the effect of such lights on the established character of the neighborhood. I p-'Z4 5. Location, lighting and type of signs; relation of signs to traffic control and the adverse effect on adjacent properties. 6. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood. 7. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress/egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces; and protection of public health by all weather surfacing on all parking areas to control dust. 8. Such other measures as will secure and protect public health, safety, morals and general welfare. 40.5 IMPROVEMENTS - All improvements to the land and all Buildings and construction on the land shall be in accordance. with the site plan approved by the City Council. 40.6 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION - On approval of the site plan by the City Council, all necessary permits or certificates authorized thereby may be issued. a. Subsequent to such approval, minor changes may be authorized by the Administrative official when such minor changes will not cause any of the following circumstances to occur: 1. A change in the character of the development; 2. An increase in the ratio of the gross floor areas in structures to the area of any lot; 3. An increase in the intensity of use; 4. A reduction in the originally approved separations between buildings; 5. An increase in the problems of circulation, safety, and utilities; 6. An increase in the external effects on adjacent property; 7. A reduction in the originally approved setbacks from property lines; 8. An increase in ground coverage by structures; 9. A reduction in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor area in the structures. 11-21 10. A change in the subject, size, lighting, flashing, animation or orientation of originally approved signs. b. Any proposed amendment to a site plan which in the opinion of the Administrative Official does not meet the criteria of sub -paragraph 40.6a above may only be approved pursuant to the same procedures and subject to the same limitations and requirements by which the original site plan was approved. 40.7 CONFLICT WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS - If any conflict exists between the language contained herein regarding site plan requirements and any site plan ordinance of the City, the more specific requirements shall apply. 19 -4 9 SECTION 41: Concept Plans 41.3 In the Content of Concept Plan section, add the following four (4) items: o. Any proposed zoning labeled. p. Existing zoning labeled on all adjacent tracts. q. Land use designation from Land Use Plan labeled for subject tract and all adjacent tracts. r. Owners' names labeled on adjacent tracts. SECTION 43: Airport Overlay Zone 43.3 Create a new subsection in the Airport Development Zone section incorporating Ordinance No. 479 (Airport Compatible Land Use). SECTION 44: Board of Adjustment * 44.3 (c) Delete Special Exception Use from the Powers and Duties of the Board of Adjustment. * 44.6 Delete Special Exception from this section. * 44.12 Transfer this entire section to Section 37 with approval by the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. SECTION 45: Specific Use Permits * 45.1 (1) Add the following districts sale of alcoholic beverages Specific Use Permit: S-P-1, 18 30 to the districts where the may be allowed with a S-P-2, and PUD. City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, City Planner SUBJECT: Revisions to the Median on Southcrest Lane SouthView Addition John Levitt, as representative of the owner, has submitted construction plans requesting revisions to the referenced median. As shown on the enclosed Exhibits 'A' and 'B', there is substantial difference in the original median and the proposed median. Staff has determined that the change from the median originally approved with the Concept Plan is substantial enough to warrant the processing of a revised Concept Plan through the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The applicant intends to formally submit a revised Concept Plan and process accordingly, however, due to the eminent paving improvements for SouthView, they are requesting a discussion of this item before P&Z and City Council. Issues to be considered with this request include the following: 1. The tracts north and south of this street are zoned '0' - Office. Staff feels that although these office tracts will probably have their main entrances on Carroll, they will also need to access the side street. Carroll is a projected 84' R.O.W. and if it has a median in the future it will be cut only for Southcrest Lane and these tracts will need to use Southcrest for north and south exits from their property. 2. Staff has met with representatives of a U.S. Post Office concerning the tract adjacent to south R.O.W. of Southcrest. The Post Office representatives are very interested in the site and have prepared a site plan for this location. They anticipate submitting preliminary plats on February 11, 1991. City of Southlake, Texas City Council January 31, 1991 Page 2 The Post Office representatives have been made aware of the median change request and have expressed their inability to accept any longer median than was previously approved. Please see the enclosed letter dated 1/30/91 and attached Post Office site plan (Concept 'D'). The other letter dated 1/11/90 discusses other issues related to the Post Office and it is our intention to bring these items before you on the February 19 agenda. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed this item on January 17, 1991. At that time Concept Plan 'C' was erroneously supplied by a Post Office employee. Staff presented the site plan as submitted and the general consensus of the Commissioners was that the median was fine if they shortened it enough to allow rear access to the Post Office from Southcrest Lane. After that meeting we were advised that the wrong site plan had been submitted. The current site plan contemplated by Post Office management is per the attached exhibit 'D'. The question before you is not really the curb cuts requested by the Post Office, but rather whether or not we allow the revision to the median in Southcrest Lane as shown on the Concept Plan for SouthView Addition. Staff feels that the adjacent office tracts should be allowed access as needed on Southcrest Lane. As a compromise, Staff would be receptive to the median if a second median cut was provided on Southcrest Lane sufficient to provide adequate access for the proposed post office. GL/lc attachments / 9-.z' Y YE x Y :F i- ai:Yg�= 1 .-------------- -- ; -- ;1,: -------------------------- s OIL .II'EEiI R 9-14.gcao N 1 r 1 �► I --,aa-7 I ' IRI �' ,� � • � • � I � N o o � 1 • 1 �I 1 1 �j ► .,d • 1r' �� i i ( i i* 1. I ` � I 1 1 • 1 a ------------ •Y I �,/Pg G �d Os � I H I • I I I I_�ll ' _Jl__ aQ2-#r-- �� _ / y— j n 1 •r�': �r 061 Z 0 ac x 1 I 1 9 101 1 1 1 I 1 l-8 _0£ 1 -----------� 1 I 1 1 I I Nt I b F-T 14 ;Oo, `Z`r.- Ot.1' "CHEST LANE t , ---------------I 1.8 ,0£ POyT oFF«E b�TE 1 I t 101 1 1 1 _1'8 ,0£ D� � 1: — q��e C— m -� SOUTHGREST LD.NE H -►C-7 - —' BO' 'l'8 ,0£ I QVST OFFICE SITE I I t 101, I � 8 � t'ROPOSED MEDID�IV 19� - I N (� o • X Az A' C) OID r� _ r rn z E'l / g5 N04TEs ►osr4r {G Q B G W T 2 U.S. PA 71—L 4►S�: • f FACILITIES SERVICE OFFICE � P.O. Box 667180 Dallas, TX 75266-7180 NOTE: '[1.415 LETTER AND T4a '=DLL-OWINC- January 11, 1991 e' 4ka,T 'C.' WIEZE C,t4t:N TO Piz. TN+E Stir PL�.N �C' tS NoT TNt1F- PKEFE�RED PLN.N. THE SSWEK 1`1EMZ%DNED� Mr Curtis Hawk ►N 7tkV6 L_ TTF }z w"lL ge Z2006\44T City Manager 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Tx 76092 Dear Sir: Subject: Sewer Service and Southcrest Ln. Access Proposed Postal Site This letter is is in response to your letter dated January 3, 1991, concerning sewerage service to the proposed Postal site located at the s.w. corner of Carroll Ave. and Southcrest Ln. The Postal service does not feel that we should absorb the cost to run a sewer service line to our proposed site. It appears that we are incurring unnecessary cost that could have been avoided had we waited to complete the project as originally planned. I will remind the you that the city was instrumental in moving the project ahead in our proposed new construction plan. Had we waited and proceeded with this project as planned then this service would in likelihood be in place when construction commences. We have been and intend to remain cooperative with the city in providing a Postal facility for the city of Southlake, however the proposed cost of $40,000.00 for the sewer line extension, $20,000.00 of which you requested we pay, is just not economically feasible for a project of this size. It should also be noted that due to the limited area available after granting additional site area for right-of-way and buffers we cannot use this site with septic tank service. In the spirit of intergovernmental cooperation we propose that you consider providing us with sewerage service to this site at a cost of not to exceed $10,000.00. If you agree we will need written assurance that sewerage service will be provided upon completion of the facility. This is needed "to assure our construction offerors of the exact cost for providing this service. l9-4 As you are aware, the residential developer due west and adjoining our proposed site is planning to extend a divided medium at the Southcrest entrance from Carroll that would preclude us from accessing the site in a safe manner as well as limit our overall site utilization. We have*not yet completed our proposed site plan, however we know that we must have unrestricted ingress/egress for our customers as well as employees and cannot accept a divided medium which we understand may be proposed to your planning and zoning board in the near future. I am enclosing a copy of the medium plan that we understand is filed with the city. This is an acceptable medium to the Postal service that will allow us to use the site as originally intended. The Postal Service is looking forward to resolving these issues and providing the city of Southlake with a Postal facility as soon possible. Please review thJA matter and respond according. LCL. Andrews Real Estate Specialist, Sr. cc:FSO402,FSO402B,Ft. Worth MSC, Attn:B. Thompson, Dallas Division Mgr/P.M.,Attn:Mgr.Support Svcs. 17-7 w 6 i O Z 3nN3AV IIOHHV3 NpTEs POST D M W � N � Z < FACILITIES SERVICE OFFICE P.O. Box 667180 Dallas, TX 75266-7180 January 30, 1991 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Sir: Subject: Site Plan Submittal Proposed Postal Site Pursuant to your request, enclosed for your review is a copy of our proposed site plan for the site located at the S.W. corner of Carroll Ave. and Southcrest Ln., Southlake, Tx. The Postal Service is submitting a plan which we feel would be the optimal use of this corner site. The local Postmaster, as well as the city has expressed concerns about limiting our access to the site via Carroll Ave. To reiterate our position concerning the sewerage to the site, we propose enjoining with the city to provide sewerage service to this area at cost not to exceed $10,000.00. Please review this matter and advise if this plan is acceptable to the city. Ir La y L. Andrews Real Estate Specialist, Sr. cc : FSO402, FSO402B, Ft. Worth MSC, Attn: B. Thompson, Zd3Q SY,zov, iria d Dallas Division-Mgr.Support Svcs re:2312B 1111tENV 3nN3AV IIOHHVO co O C n w m w r a z m W r W � V_ LL IL O � 0 w 1� !u , lu to : fll t x Ju City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Proposed Revision of Preliminary Plat SouthRidge Lakes, All Phases This item is offered as a discussion item only. No action will be taken. Arvida/JMB Partners has presented the attached revision (Alternate B) of the approved preliminary plat known as Alternate A. "Alternate A" was approved by the City Council on April 18, 1989. According to the Land Use Data chart provided, this plat contained 379 SF-20A lots and 1 SF-1A lot making a total of 380 residential lots. The approved plat showed a boulevard being built from existing N. Peytonville Avenue at Raven Bend Estates to W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The proposed revision shows 393 SF-20A lots and 1 SF-lA lot making a total of 394 residential lots. It further shows significant changes to the approved thoroughfare widths and alignments. On January 17, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission acknowledged that changes have occurred in the area (i.e. high school location, 84-foot R.O.W. not being extended South of F.M. 1709) that warranted rethinking the proposed thoroughfare plan. They indicated that a sixty-four foot (641) R.O.W. would probably be sufficient for the traffic anticipated in the area. The Commission expressed concerns for the safety of the drivers on North Peytonville Avenue due to the existing curves and also for the residents along SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. However, they did not favor putting the entire traffic burden on North Peytonville Avenue. The consensus appeared to be that they recognized the need for a revision to the thoroughfares in the area, but that they could not support the option as it was presented. They further recommended that Arvida work with the Staff and the surrounding property owners when considering other options. City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager January 31, 1991 �. Page Two Attached are copies of Staff Land Use/Thoroughfare Plan, DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. mi KPG review comments, the current and a traffic study prepared by for the Arvida Company. za-z City of Southlake, Texas REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO:N/A REVIEW NO: TWO DATE of REVIEW: 1 /31/91 PROJECT NAME: Southridge Lakes - Unplatted Portion DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 01/31/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Arvida/JMB Partners Levitt Engineers ROLM Tower, Suite 350 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 15303 Dallas Parkway Southlake, Texas 76092 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: (817) 488-3313 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581. * This is an informal review for discussion purposes only. 1. The thoroughfare plan shows the need for a 84' R.O.W. Arterial to connect Peytonville at the north edge of this property to the existing Southridge Lakes Parkway. The need for this 84' Arterial has been reduced due to this thoroughfare not extending south of F.M. 1709. However, staff does feel there should be a 64' R.O.W. connection from Peytonville to F.M. 1709. 2. The thoroughfare plan shows the need for a 64' R.O.W. collector crossing East-West through the northern portion of this property. This requirement was not required with the first submittal of this development. Also, during the review of the Sword Addition, this projected thoroughfare was not required to be extended west of Peytonville. 3. Although not required by the Council in their previous approval, staff recommends additional street connections to Shady Oaks and Peytonville to aid in emergency access. * Phases I and III Final Plats provided a R.O.W. dedication of only 32' from center line of Peytonville. Crosstimber Hills plats along the west R.O.W. of Peytonville dedicated 30' from centerline. * Staff and'Arvida's consultants have prepared exhibits available at City Hall for your review. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Levitt Engineers Arvida/JMB Partners 26-3 r 0 pY J i Q - Q � W oe � Ilu 3 Z Z J = c . i i 026 -q �fd I • • iJd soepo I�oes�a nti ��vncvvi�.�d a - a r u 20 -6 � 0 !!1 7 0 X j) d : p A oc -o of U3 U.- d 10 Q J � NP L� cr O f '. ��...� �• 1. ' ; : • .l. ..\` . � \Z t K < YLY{ ��4fti '•' .. . . . .' ..• . Y R} O ........ ........ ..•. ................ •..''•'•••''.'.'•'•'.''.'.'.'.'.'..'.'.'.......... .... .... S 11 .'. Li •, :tiC:jT:v .. .... .. � `�,,, .. ...... ... ..........f is Arvida Company TE.(rS M CwEST Cri1SGN 1=3C3 :A�.AS »FK'NAY SUI'_ 350 DALLAS. -:x S'S2s8.46i5 T'E' _?-CNE. Z-1) 380.5075 January 9, 1991 mv- Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 N Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: Attached for your review is a traffic study prepared by DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc., a prominent traffic engineering firm here in the Metroplex. This study supports Arvida Company's strong belief that SouthRidge Lakes Parkway should be reconf igured as is depicted in the new concept plan which is now being considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. The study is self explanatory, and I would encourage you and other members of the city staff to review it carefully. Several factors mentioned in the traffic study have changed since the city and Arvida first agreed to build a four lane road through SouthRidge Lakes. The new high school site will prompt the continued heavy use of Peytonville Road now and in the future. The approved plat for Stone Lakes will not allow for the future extension of SouthRidge Lakes Parkway to Continental Boulevard. A two lane road in SouthRidge Lakes will provide level of service "A" to the city as well as affording the community a safer neighborhood environment. Obviously, we are available to meet with you should you have any questions or need additional information. Best Regards, Sean G. Randall Vice President Texas/Midwest Division cc: Bruce E. Smith John E. Levitt A 161 SOUTHI2IDGE LAKES PARKWAY ROADWAY EXTENSION IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Prepared for. Mr. Sean G. Randall Arvida Company Prepared by. DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. 330 Union Station Dallas, TX 75202 (214)748-6740 J90208 December 26,1990 ',Q- 1Q DrShazo. �tarrk 3 Tam,. Inc. Fn_inmr, • Planners December 26, 1990 Mr. Sean G. Randall Vice President Arvida Company 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 350 Dallas, Texas 75248-4645 Re: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway Extension; J90208 Dear Mr. Randall: We have analyzed the thoroughfare system of the City of Southlake in the vicinity of the SouthRidge Lakes Addition. Our analysis has taken into consideration the traffic projections of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the recently approved plat for Stone Lakes Addition and the new Carroll High School. The Stone Lakes sub- division has been platted without the continuation of SouthRidge Lakes Parkway to the south. Access to Stone Lakes is provided off of FM 1709 at a location east of the intersection between FM 1709 and SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. Because SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will terminate at FM 1709, Peyton- ville Avenue, rather than SouthRidge Lakes Parkway, will be utilized by through traffic continuing on south to Continental. Commercial de- velopment planned at the intersection of Peytonville Avenue and FM 1709, as well as the planned Carroll High School, will become the major traffic generators in the area. These are easily accessible both from the north and south via Peytonville Avenue as well as from the east and west along Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). It appears most logical that the alignment for the north -south major thoroughfare in this vicinity should be along Peytonville Avenue rather than SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. This configuration would better serve the existing traffic desire lines in the city as well as the future traffic requirements of the high school and commercial de- velopments planned in the area. The Year 2000 traffic projections are depicted in the attached figure. The traffic volumes are based upon the projections of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and supplemented by our own projections for the SouthRidge Lakes sub- division. Mr. Sean Randal December 26, 1990 Page 2 The SouthRidge Lakes subdivision will generate about 3,800 trips per day when it is fully developed. These trips will be distributed between the north and south access points to the neighborhood. A two lane roadway can accommodate this projected demand at a very high level of service (LOS "A"). The existing parkway can be transitioned into a 31-foot wide street over a distance of about 500 feet. The connection between SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Peytonville Avenue to the north should be designed to discourage the through movement of traffic on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. The width of the pavement on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway should be widened to 37 feet at locations where heavy turning movements will occur. In conclusion, we believe that the alignment of this major north -south thoroughfare in the City of Southlake should generally follow the existing route of Peytonville Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709 rather than a scheme which utilizes SouthRidge Lakes Parkway as a portion of its route. This alignment has the following advantages. o Continuity of System - Peytonville Avenue provides a better interface with the street and highway network of the city. Motorists southbound on Peytonville with destinations south of FM 1709 can continue south on the thoroughfare after crossing FM 1709. Whereas, under the SouthRidge Lakes option, these same motorists would be required to make two turning maneuvers on and off FM 1709. The recently platted Stone Lakes sub- division would prevent SouthRidge Lakes Parkway from being extended south of FM 1709. o Traffic Safety - The Peytonville Avenue alternative would be safer. The SouthRidge Lakes Parkway alternative would require additional turning maneuvers on the high volume highway (FM 1709). Traffic volumes on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway would pro- bably not be sufficient to warrant a traffic signal at FM 1709. 4 traffic signal currently serves the intersection of Peyton- ville Avenue and FM 1709. o Activity Centers - The Peytonville Avenue alternative better serves the traffic desires of motorists with destinations at the planned Carroll High School and the commercial districts planned on three quadrants of Peytonville and FM 1709. This alternative also better serves the travel desires of motorists destined for Carroll Elementary School on Continental. o Duplication of Facilities - The Peytonville option would uti- lize an established traffic corridor through the city. The SouthRidge Lakes option would establish a second corridor; however, it would not divert sufficient traffic off Peyton- ville to preclude its (Peytonville) need as a major thorough- fare. JO-11 Mr. Sean Randall December 26, 1990 Page 3 o Neighborhood Planning - The Peytonville Avenue alternative would preserve the integrity and quality of the SouthRidge Lakes Estates neighborhood. A major thoroughfare along South - Ridge Lakes Parkway would create a barrier between the east and west sides of the development. Through traffic on the parkway would be detrimental to the development of a safe and quality residential neighborhood. Sincerely, DESHAZO, STAREK & TANG, INC. John J. DeShazo, Jr. President Attachment U -13 A 121915 h w sL �* 3 C Dove 10692 d 0 FIGURE 1 Adjusted Yr 2000 Projections- DS&T (Daily Traffic Volumes) Ne tsk° 21569 (F.M. 1709) a0-Iq 22569 17330 City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 L-A i 14V I TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: MONTICELLO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT Attached is the Monticello Developer's Agreement submitted for the Council's approval. The items of interest peculiar to this project are: 1. Developer is required to pay a sewer prorata fee for S-4. 2. The City will pay the difference between a 12" and 8" water line along Continental Blvd. 3. The Developer is required to pay Park Fees for 54 lots at $500 each ($27,000). Developer is requesting 50% reimbursement. 4. The Developer is required to pay Perimeter Street Fees for Continental Blvd. and White's Chapel. 5. Staff would like to discuss with the Council an amenity that the Developer is proposing. He is proposing a large statue to be placed in the center of an intersection. Staff will bring drawings to the meeting for purposes of discussion. Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for consideration. If you have any question, please contact me. /41-)� MHB/lc attachment: Developer's Agreement a/-/ City of Southlake, Texas E M 0 R A N D U M January 29, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Janet Murphy, Parks and Recreation Board Chairman SUBJECT: MONTICELLO, PHASE I, DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT ----------------------------------------------------------- At the January 28, 1991 Parks and Recreation Board meeting it was brought to our attention that the Developer's Agreement for Phase I of the Monticello subdivision may be on the February 5, 1991 City Council agenda. It is the Park Board's desire to assist the Council concerning park related issues. The information we have at hand concerning this subdivision is limited. Up to now, the developers have not been required to be more specific as to their plans for parks, open space and recreational facilities. To rectify this in the future, we have just recently developed and implemented a questionnaire to be completed by each developer, commercial and residential, upon application for platting. A copy is attached. We intend to review these completed questionnaires and make timely recommendations to Council on a regular basis. As you know, up to 50% of the total parkland dedication requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance may be fulfilled by private parkland, open space and recreational facilities. We feel that passive recreation facilities or undeveloped open space within a new development are desirable, however, do little to reduce the new development's demand for City organized recreation facilities or City sponsored sport associations. Staff has informed us that the Monticello development is requesting a 50% credit for the private open space they are providing. It is our understanding that Councilmembers chose to give 50% credit to the Timberlake and Southridge subdivisions due to the facilities which they proposed. We are unaware of any proposed facilities in the Monticello development and would respectfully request that the Council consider either requiring a similar level of facilities or grant a reduced amount of credit offset. JM/ lc -\ I -1t,v4 City of Southlake PARKLAND DEDICATION APPLICATION The City of Southlake, in accordance with its subdivision ordinance, requires parkland dedication for all new development. Parkland dedication will be assessed at the rate of one acre for each 50 residential lots, and one acre for each 50 acres of commercial or industrial development. City Council periodically establishes the current value of one (1) acre of land in the City as a basis for valuation of fees required for dedication. Under current valuation of $25,000/acre the following parkland fees result: Residential: $500 per Lot or $500 per Living Unit Commercial/Industrial: $500 per Acre Up to 50% of the total dedication requirement may be fulfilled by private parkland, open space or recreational facilities. Passive recreation facilities or undeveloped open space within a new development do little to reduce the new developments demand for City organized recreation facilities or City sponsored sport associations. Anticipated participation levels in City group activities by the future residents of the new development will be the prime factor in determining the percent credit given for private parkland. The Parks and Recreation Board meets at 7:00 p.m. on the 1st and 3rd Mondays in City Council chambers. Any developer desiring to meet with the Parks Board is invited to contact the City Secretary and request placement on the next available Parks Board agenda. The Park Board welcomes the opportunity to discuss the many options available to meet the parkland dedication requirement in order to best serve the City, the new development and its residents. Any questions, please feel free to contact any of the following representatives: Steve Bender, Parks Board Budget Coordinator 817/488-9107 Janet Murphy, Parks Board Chairman 817/488-2884 Greg Last, City Planner 817/481-5581, ext. 744 Note: The attached application should be submitted with any application for a zoning change requiring a Concept Plan, a preliminary plat, final plat or plat showing, and a development site plan. a?- /- 3 APPLICATION FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION �W Type of Application: Preliminary Plat Final Plat (* If Final conforms to preliminary, fill in #1 only) 1. Development Name: 2. Phase , Total Acres , Total Lots 3. 4. Pg. 2 of 2 Phase , Total Acres Total Lots Total Parkland Dedication Assessed*: $ * Residential = $ 500 per Lot * Commercial = $ 500 per Acre Proposed allocation to fulfill parkland dedication requirement: Land: $ Fees: $ Improvements* $ *Describe any improvements: 5. Does this development propose private parkland/open space? Yes No 6. 7. If Yes, please describe: Total Acres , Proposed Recreational Facilities: If this development contains private parkland, open space or recreational facilities, are you requesting partial credit parkland dedication requirements? Yes No Is this development a Planned Unit Development? Yes No _ towards 8. Please note any additional information you wish to supply the Parks Board. Feel free to reference attached text or exhibits as necessary. 9. Contact Person: Firm: Address: 0?/-V Phone: Fax: APPLICATION FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION Pg. 2 of 2 Tyne of Application: Preliminary Plat Final Plat kw If Final conforms to preliminary, fill in #1 only) 1. Development Name: 2. Phase I , Phase TT , W\0a jT\(-L: DLO Total Acres 46 , Total Acres 82 r Total Lots 5 Total Lots 48 3. Total Parkland Dedication Assessed*: Phase I $ 27,000 * Residential = $ 500 per Lot * Commercial = $ 500 per Acre 4. Proposed allocation to fulfill parkland dedication requirement: Land: $ 300,000 Fees: $ 10_ Improvements* $ 200.000 *Describe any improvements: Park road, parking lot, lake stocked with fish, jogging trails, open soccer field area. 5. Does this development propose private parkland/open space? Yes _ y No If Yes, please describe: Total Acres _, This area will provide he homeowners and their children a lace o wak, jog, bike, fish and an open field or football, soccer, kiting or any enera na-i�+Ge Proposed Recreational Facilities: Same as above. 6. If this development contains private parkland, open space or recreational facilities, are you requesting partial credit toward: parkland dedication requirements? Yes x No 50% credit 7. Is this development a Planned Unit Development? Yes No x S. Please note any additional information you wish to supply the Parks Board. Feel free to reference attached text or exhibits as necessary. See above 9. Contact Person: Larry Cole Phone: 267-4421 Firm: Larry Cole Companies Fax: (817) 283-0929 807 Forest Ridge, Suite 105O'!`_ Address. r` Bedford, Texas 76022� , p'JBLIC WORIX DEPT. a1-.5- MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, of the Monticello Subdivision to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 54 lots contained within the Monticello Subdivision (Phase 1) and to the off -site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer agrees that no building permits will be required prior to the final completion and acceptance of the water, sewer, streets and drainage facilities by the City of Southlake. An deviation from this agreement may result in a revision of the Developer's Agreement by the City Council. C. The Developer will present to the City a performance bond and payment bond or Letter of Credit or cash escrow guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the City and Developer. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. -1- D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of Two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow required in C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the subdivision shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said subdivision by the Developer, save and except as provided above. F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City of Southlake and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. G. On all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. To pay to the City three (3%) percent of the construction cost for inspection fees of the water, streets, drainage facilities, and sanitary sewer. It is agreed by both the City and the Developer that the City will pay the following testing fees and the Developer will be responsible to pay for all other testing fees required by the City not listed below: -2- a1- 7 a) All nuclear density tests on the finished roadway subgrade (95% Standard). Trench testing (95% Standard) shall be paid by the Developer b) All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization c) Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders d) Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples Charges for retesting as a result of failed tests will be paid by the Developer. Fees are payable prior to construction of each phase, based on actual bid construction costs. The Developer will be responsible to pay for all inspection fees when inspection is required on Saturday or Sunday. - These fees are considered over and above the 3% inspection fee as stated above. Acceptance of the project will not be given until all inspection fees are paid. 2. To delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this contract until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintain the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer or Builder has notice of costs. I. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. -3- J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Monticello Subdivision to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, approved by the City Engineer the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. C. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Monticello residential development of the City of Southlake shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City Engineer. -4- al-g 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and one year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by an engineering study performed by the Director of Public Works. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre -planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of Monticello Subdivision to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. -5- a /_ /o E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc. to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and placed the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: G. It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Monticello Subdivision may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a Home Owners Association. The City shall be responsible only for the maintenance of those items within the public right-of-way and then only to the extent provided in other subdivisions within the city. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City if required by this agreement. ma A /-11 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Approved for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. Developer's Agreement executed. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents,servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. -7- /" / 42- In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. -g- a /-13 IV. OTHER ISSUES: • A. SEWER PRO RATA: The Developer agrees that there is an existing sewer line (S-4) that this subdivision will tie to and that the Developer will pay their prorata share of the S-4 sewer line as required by the Sewer Prorata Ordinance #493. The prorata fee will be payable prior to start of construction. B. WATER LINES: The Developer and City agree that a 12" water line is required by the City along Continental Blvd. It is the City's policy that the City will pay the cost difference between a 12" water line and a 8" water line to the developer provided that the difference cost is reasonable in the industry. Payment will be made to the Developer after the acceptance of the water line by the City. C. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees that this subdivision is required to dedicate parkland or pay parkland fees as required by Article VI of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. Since this phase is less than 250 lots, the Developer will be required to pay $500 per lot (54 lots in Phase I) or $27,000 parkland fees in lieu of parkland dedication as required by the Ordinance. The Developer has requested that they be given a credit of 50% toward the parkland fees for the amenities that will be installed in this phase. It should be noted that Lot 53, Block 2, of this phase is a commercial lot and was not included in this phase of construction. Park Fees for the lot will be required when the lot is developed. E. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: The Developer agrees to perform Section IV, Paragraph B, Ordinance No. 494. in accordance with sub paragraph 2 of SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: 7 -10- City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 29, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ann Barnes, Park Board Member SUBJECT: SOFT DRINK VENDORS AND ELECTRIC SCOREBOARDS FOR THREE BALL FIELDS The Southlake Parks & Recreation Board heard a presentation by Mike Thompson, Southlake Baseball Association, on soft drink vendors for the concession stand at Bicentennial Park. The contract proposals were from Coke, Pepsi, and Dr. Pepper. The proposals all offered electric scoreboards for the three ball fields in conjunction with their soft drink concessions. The Park Board voted to recommend the City Council authorize a contractual agreement with Dr. Pepper Corporation for the required five years. Advertising space is available for sale at the bottom of each of these scoreboards. Southlake Baseball and Park Board will work in conjunction to sell these spaces with funds to go into the Park Board's fund for improvements to Bicentennial Park. We request this item be placed on the next available Council meeting so the Council may authorize the mayor to enter into a contract with Dr. Pepper for providing soft drinks and electric scoreboards for the contracted period of five years. Ann Barnes Parks Board AB/lC aos- Bicentennial Park Electronic Scorebord Proposal Recap TERMS OF SCOREBOARD APPROX INSTALL COST CONTRACT MODEL # $ VALUE COST EST SIZE MAINTANCE TO U�c .ununnntononoevil nnnt000totonntonlive ototontot000 Iloilo n Oslo toontololl Oslo onnOslo ntonnntounnnnnntotonn oil nn :COKE :10 YRS Fair Play $3125 EA PAID 51X 16' MANUFACT $600E BA 7100 WARRANTY :DR.PEPPER: 5 YRS Fair Play $1500 EA $1800 TOT 4'X 8' MANUFACT f BA 100 _WARRANTY : :PEPSI 5 YRS Fair Play $1500 EA•$1800 TOT 4'X 8' MANUFACT C. BA 100 WARRANTY "Iloilo of 11 it 11 11 toll of Iloilo 11 111111 of so gill so to $I to Oslo 111111 11 Iloilo 11I isunnsili The city must provide or contract for 110 volt, 30 amp service tc each of the scoreboard units. In addition trenching for each of the control boxes must also be provided' The installation of the scoreboards can be done by the city or the scoreboard company. The price of setting the posts, hanging the signs, and providing the final wirinq is 800. This price is quoted frog the distributor of the signs, Ol - 'llia However, they state installation is not that difficult and many -cities handle this internally. Coke, in their agreement, will provide installation of all three Lscoreboards. Their proposal asks the association for an additional $6000 defray the costs. This can be recouped by selling, advertising space on each of the boards. There will be a space of 3' by 12' on each to be solc to a co-sponsor for $2000 each or at whatever cost we determine. Pepsi will not provide installation but it is negotiable in their contract. In addition, Pepsi will allow us to place other info on the scoreboard but not use another sponsor.(An example would be "Southlaki Pony Baseball" or "Bicentennial Park".) Dr. Pepper also will not provide installation. However, they will allow the baseball association to sell the open advertising space to another non-competitive sponsor. Products that are offered in pre -mix for each are as follows: Coke Pepsi Dr. Pepper Diet Coke Diet Pepsi Diet Dr. Pepper Sprite Lemon Slice RC Cola Mr. Pibb Orange Slice Seven"Up Fanta Orange Mug Root Beer Sunkist Orange Cherry Coke Mountain Dew Big Red XXX Root Beer Each of these proposals has its own merit. We as a group need decide which one to support and begin work before the upcoming baseball season begins. Any input or suggestions will be appreciated. .09 Vr 0/ rW Specifications Model BA 100 Cabinet size: 8ft. Wide by 4 ft. Tall All aluminum construction. Riveted and reinforced at corners and points of stress. Finish: One coat of acid etch vinyl primer. Two coats of epoxy enamel with plactisizer added. Available in black with white trim only. Furnished with four steel hanger brackets located at 4ft. on center. Numerals: Recessed 18 inch with protective screens including the Ball, Strike and Out area. Lamps are 130 volt 30 watt, extended fife flood lamps. Electronics: All solid state. Enclosed in a single removable, plug in pack- age. Control: Low voltage control has push button switches 'to advance Score, Innings and Ball, Strike and Out circuits. No power is needed at the control. Remote control cable: Multi conductor 18 guage, 300 volt insulated. Warranty: One year warranty on parts and workmanship. Lamps excluded. Replacement parts in stock for exchange or repair. 5c?-3 00000 • C. 0 VP a �. z Z • 0 • I 4m,- Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas P.O. BOX MM24 • DA". TEXAS 75M . (214) 57S-102a January 11, 1o91 Southlake Baseball Assoc. C/O Mike Thompson Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas s pleased to offer the followin to Southlake Baseball Association. -Dr Pe g proposal Association with three (3) electronic baseball will for tBicentake ennia111 Park. In consideration, Southlake Baseball Association grants Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Texas the following exclusive rights at Bicentennial Park and all other activities controlled by Southlake Baseball Association for (6) years: CONTRACT; April 1, 1991 through March 31, 1996 A. Exclusive Dr Pepper identified equipment. 8. Exclusive supplier of all soft drinks for concessions. C. Exclusive point of sale materials advertising Dr Pepper products at or near all concessions. D. First right of refusal for additional scoreboards with Southlake Baseball Association. It is further understood that the above mentioned scoreboards are the property Of Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas and will remain so for the life of the scoreboard. Southlake Baseball Association will be responsible for providing installation of scoreboards and providing electrical needs to the boards for operation. Or Pepper Bottling Company of Texas Southlake Baseball Association a� - s TOTAL P.02 City of Southlake, Texas r � s a M E M O R A N D U M r "c"` ' February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: TRUCK BIDS Attached is the bid tabulation and specifications for three (3) 3/4-ton pickup and two (2) extended cab pickup trucks. The bids were opened and read aloud on Thursday, January 1, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. Ten vendors in the area were sent bid specifications and eight (8) bids were returned. All of the major car companies were represented in the bidding procedure. The low bidder meeting specifications was North Loop Dodge in Fort Worth for both size vehicles. The budgeted amount for all five vehicles was $65,000 ($13,000 each). The distribution of the trucks will be as follows: Truck Extended Cab Extended Cab 3/4-ton Pickup 3/4-ton Pickup 3/4-ton Pickup T)iNYicinn Replace/New Water (Meter Reader) Replacement Street (Constr. Inspector) New Street (Superintendent) Replacement Water (Utility) Replacement Sewer (Utility) New The bid tabulation outlines the delivery time and the warranty periods for both types of vehicles. North Loop Dodge has the lowest delivery time and meets or exceeds the warranty period of the other bidders. Staff compared bids for the same type of vehicles from the State Purchasing Agency and Houston -Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC). A comparison of the bids between HGAC, the State and North Loop Dodge are as follows: Vehicle Type Extended Cab 3/4-ton Pickup * Did not bid. ** This bid was 4-cylinder. HGAC rl $13,908.86 State Purchasing **$10,438.74 $11,887.00 North Loop Dodge $ 10,097.00 $ 12,097.00 for a 6-cylinder vehicle and Staff specified a 3 -/ City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk February 1, 1991 •� Page 2 As can be seen, the State's bid on the 3/4-ton pickups is lower than North Loop Dodge by $210.00 per vehicle. If the City purchases the 3/4-ton vehicles from the State, the vehicles would have to be purchased from a dealer in Austin, Texas. Also, the State's bid allows a 90-day delivery time compared to North Loop Dodge's delivery time of 45 days. It is the Staff's recommendation that the vehicles be purchased from North Loop Dodge for the following reasons: 1. It is always to the City's advantage to purchase vehicles locally so that better attention is given to repairs during the warranty period. 2. The difference in cost between the State's bid and North Loop Dodge for the three 3/4-ton vehicles is $630.00 and it is the Staff's opinion that a local vendor would offset this cost over the years. 3. If the City purchased the 3/4-ton vehicles from the State and the extended cab from North Loop Dodge, the City would be buying from two different vendors. It is to the City's advantage to purchase from one vendor where it is feasible. 4. The total cost of all five vehicles from North Loop Dodge is $56,485 versus the State's bid of $56,538.48. Based on the above, it is the Staff's recommendation that the Council award the bids for two (2) extended cab pickups to North Loop Dodge for $10,097 each for a total bid of $20,194 and for three (3) 3/4-ton pickups to North Loop Dodge for $12,097 each for a total bid of $36,291.00. The total bid package for the five (5) vehicles is $56,485.00. North Loop Dodge has an extended warranty coverage for $500 per vehicle. Staff is reluctant to recommend that the City purchase the coverage because of the warranties given. However, if the Council decides to purchase the extended warranty coverage, Staff would do so. Please place this item on the next Council agenda for consideration. i4, MHB/lc attachment: Bid tabulation o?3 - ... >. E E C •o •o 14 Eo 60 I•I \O \ to to0EE NNm 3 m en a '1 •-1 m O m w v [� >E>4 I .4 -r I to o 14 E A to Q� v Q O r-1 iJ Cl a tom V] O U U «j 1-4 Eae a 4J O E" d� \ N aE � 4J 4 O mO W m 0 a•• in o z 'U U w r o+ M •-e w O 4 E V 14 \ U x 0 o w ma a w 0 z >. eV w •-+ EE at X er wr4 ga Ocn E. 1 �a eh O to xh O to W Ae: •• U o� a H to EE E A O a7 E E •o •o @o Bow mom C4 C4 cn In m . 4 .-e ' O Ln 0% r- 0 m E E E E •O •o •O .o 00 oO OO OO EO EO Eo Eo%0 toOm to tom totooOE4 eh Ln m en M m en M to to a O O Ln at en V O O O to O O O O O O r7 O O o O OD O t0 aD O 9 OD a1 a1 cn a1 r- M en O .4 m N N en V eh CV) C4 C4 N tV N N N 0 o O O ao O O O O O O r-e O O O a+ A O m at en in aD to er qr a+ to eh to to o en to r-e rl .-I rt .i r� .-e r-I 9-4 9-e .� N 1 rl 1 cV 1 N 1 N 1 ey 1 N E E E E E E C Oo 00 Oo Oo Oo Oo to Eo so EO so EO Eo $d \O \O \0 \ W V 0 E M Q E4 to o m ro o m w 0 Ee ro o m to aDe�a vines mom mom VON rfenm I I O O o O O en O O O o O N ra 1; O tz 4 A en to 4J eT O at at to O I I 4J m N In to 0% to 00 \ E U to r •♦ •-I V eri O O O O O in 4 O to U 'O 'O V W at o ch ch N in P.i ON \ O 0 N N M eh V V z z m f1e •-e .� r-4 r-I .-I r4 >e eh I cn eh e+) CV) cn eh - cri 4J a 4J 01 U W +I to to O $d O H 41 rq to W r-I m 4 C m 3: 3m U IL) z 0 m a'f Am 0 00 Ato 41 0% 10 v 0 O +1 U r-4 41 U 4 A 0 $d 'O >4 $4 $4 E 41 o a r-I C C R a A 00 too 01 too oie -•f0 4) CD N zA aW h .hz EnEe ma 64Q CD to . . . . r-4 C4 erf er Ln t0 !*- CD > > > > 1 > > > ORDINANCE NO. 522A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 522, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE MUNICIPAL COURT IN SOUTHLARE AS A MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD BY PROVIDING THE TERM OF OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, in an election held on January 19, 1991 pursuant to Government Code Section 30.482(b), the electorate determined that the judge of the Southlake Municipal Court of Record shall be chosen by election; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 30.486 provides that the City Council shall provide for the term of office of its municipal court judges. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That Section 5 of Ordinance No. 522 is hereby amended to read as follows: "A municipal judge in the Southlake court of record must be a licensed attorney in good standing and must reside within the City of Southlake or a contiguous city. A person may not serve as a municipal judge while that person holds other office or employment with the City government. The term of office for the elected municipal court judge shall be for two (2) years. The City Council shall set the salary of the municipal judge no later than two (2) weeks before the election filing deadline. The City Council may appoint persons as relief municipal slake\ord.19A (13091) -1- judges and set their compensation as set forth in Section 30.487 of the Government Code." SECTION 2 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of slake\ord.19A (13091) -2- any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date• ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: slake\ord.19A (13091) -3- City of Southlake, Texas rece-h-!c�d M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TARRANT COUNTY CONTRACT to RECONSTRUCT HIGHLAND & KIMBALL In the 1990-91 budget, two streets are scheduled to be reconstructed by Tarrant County crews. The streets are Highland from Shady Oaks to Kimball ($97,500) and South Kimball, from Southlake Blvd. to Continental ($40,500) for a total budget cost of $138,000. Tarrant County informed the City last Friday that they are ready to start to work on February 11, 1991. This has caught the City by surprise because the work was scheduled to start in June of this year. Before work begins, testing of the existing soil should be analyzed to see what kind of material exists. If the subgrade is a clay type soil with PI's averaging above 30, then the subgrade will be lime stabilized. If the subgrade is a sandy type soil with PI's averaging below 20, then it may be the staff's recommendation to install 6" of base material instead of the lime stabilization. To install the 6" of base material would cost an additional $60,000 for the two streets combined. If the Council approves the additional cost for the base material, it would not be installed until the staff consulted with the soil laboratory and verified that method would give the street a long life. The testing company is presently in the process of testing Kimball and the results should be completed by Friday, February 8, 1991. With the above scenario in mind, it would be staff's recommendation to request from the Council to authorize the staff to install the 6" of base material in lieu of lime or cement stabilization if the soils' report recommends that method. The additional funds would be paid from the infrastructure reserve account. a5- ( City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk February 1, 1991 Page 2 Attached is the contract from Tarrant County authorizing them to perform the work on Highland and Kimball. Please place on the Council's next agenda to consider entering into the attached contract with Tarrant County and authorizing staff to use 6" base material as subgrade in lieu of lime or cement stabilization if the soils' report recommends same. If you have any questions, please contact me. MHB/lc attachment a5-,A F E B- 1- 9 1 F R I 1 4: 4 9 C O M M_ H AMP T O N P_ 0 2 M THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS CONTRACT This Agreement made and entered into this the day of , 1991, by and between the County of Tarrant, acting herein by and through its governing body the Commissioners' Court, hereinafter referred to as TARRANT COUNTY, and the City of Southlake acting herein by and through its governing body, hereinafter referred to as THE CITY, both of Tarrant county, State of Texas, witnesseth: WHEREAS, this Agreement is made pursuant to and in strict compliance with the provisions and dictates of Article 4413 (32c) V.T.C.S., more particularly known as the INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT; and WHEREAS, the party or parties paying for the performance of governmental functions or services shall make payments therefor from current revenues available to the paying party; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the two parties find that the project or undertaking is necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has the legal authority to build or maintain the project or to provide such service, and the construction and improvement thereof is in the common interest of both parties hereto; and that the division of costs provided for constitutes adequate consideration to each party; set project being more particularly described as: Reconstruction of South Kimball (from East Southlake Blvd. 4-50-3 •� - -+7 L:uf' M M P T 0 N P - 03 to East Continental Blvd.) and East and West Highland (from Shady Oaks to North Kimball). WHEREAS, the CITY agrees that it is solely responsible for the furnishing of flag -man and all warning devices necessary, or required by law, to warn the public of dangers in connection with the premises and/or the work being performed under this agreement. WHEREAS, the parties hereto, in order to facilitate the financing and construction of the needed facility, and in order to share the costs of having said work to be done have agreed to share in the financing of said construction as hereinafter stated in detail. For and in consideration of the mutual undertaking hereinafter set forth and for adequate consideration given, the parties agree as follows: 1. Tarrant County agrees to perform the following work: reconstruction of South Kimball (from East Southlake Blvd. to East Continental Blvd.) and East and West Highland (from Shady Oaks to North Kimball). The work will include cleaning ditches, pulverization of existing surfaces, stabilization (as directed by the City of Southlake) and application of 2" hot mix surface. 2. Tarrant County agrees to provide the labor and equipment necessary to complete the construction. 3. The CITY agrees to pay for the actual cost of the materials necessary to accomplish the construction. By entering into this Agreement the parties do not create any obligations express or implied other than those set forth herein B— 1— 9 1 FRI 1 4: 5 0 COMM. H A M R T O N R_ 0 4 and this Contract shall not create any rights in parties not signatories hereto. This Agreement shall terminate automatically upon happening of any of the following events: 1. The completion of the improvement provided for herein or; 2. At the end of one (1) year from date herein, unless renewed by either party by giving written notice of its intention to renew the agreement for a like period to the expiration of such initial term. ATTEST: BY: Authorized City Official TARRANT COUNTY: TOM VANL)ZMG7k -Lr'r', 4Vu114y V uuyo BOB HAMPTON, commissioner Precinct Three as-s City of Southiake, Texas E M 0 R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR GARY FICKES AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution 91-05, appointments to SEDC Resolution 91-05 allows for the appointment of three (3) members, and one (1) Council Representative to the Southlake Economic Development Council. Currently the members appointed by the Council include; Phillip Bressinck, Virginia Clow, and Michael Thompson. Rick Wilhelm is currently.the representative from Council as you know. I have attached the applications received as of this date. Any other applications will be presented to you on Tuesday evening prior to the meeting. If you have any questions, please give me a call. LL/sl RESOLUTION NO.91-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING THREE (3) PERSONS TO REPRESENT THE CITIZENS, AND ONE (1) CITY COUNCIL MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, entered into an agreement with the Southlake Economic Development Council, which is a nonprofit corporation, established under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of promoting business in the City of Southlake; and, WHEREAS, part of the membership for the Southlake Economic Development Council is to be appointed by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is to select one (1) representative from City Council and three (3) members from the community, to serve on the commission; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1 The three (3) members who currently serve on the council include: Phillip Bressinck, Virginia Clow and Michael Thompson. They were appointed on the SEDC for the 1990 term. Section 2. The City Council selected Rick Wilhelm to serve on the SEDC, as a representative from the City Council. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Southlake, hereby selects the following persons to represent the citizens of Southlake replacing the members noted in Section 1 of this Resolution. 1. 2. 3. And, , is hereby appointed to SEDC as the City Council representative, for the 1991 term. Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective upon approval by the City Council. r Resolution 91-05 Appointment to SEDC page two PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of I ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor 40. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT PERSONAL INFORMATION t� .BAN 311991 OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY,; A NAME: y Z nR DATE: ADDRESS: ` j L. L �.D IN CITY: TELEPHONE NU 4BERS : (home) (work) PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE CITY SECRETARY. PLEASE FILL IT OUT COMPLETELY. EACH APPLICATION WILL BE KEPT ON FILE FOR ONE (1) YEAR. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REFILE AFTER THAT TIME, IF YOU ARE STILL INTERESTED AND AVAILABLE TO SERVE ON THE OC12-11TTEE. PLEASE LIST THE BOARD OR C)jpaSSION FOR WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED, USING A SEPAPATE FOR4 FOR EACH BOARD OR C014IISSION. APPOINTMENT DESIRED: L�,q /�&� 1/.r QUALIFICATIONS: (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment ) P.FASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on this ARE YOU CUPP.ENTLY SERVING ON ANY OTHER BOARD/CON-IISSION IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE? DO YOU UNDERSTAND Ha-', THIS BOARD/COMMISSION OPERATES AND YOUR DUTIES AS All APPOINTEE? DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ATTENDANCE AND ACTIVE SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH APPOINTEE? JI/ 30- y 0`1 '91*08'39 PRU-BACHE FORT WORTH CITY CP sounIIipm t 'tL m L�� 1 F E 91 1991 OFFICE .O.F CITY SECREY APPLICATION MR APPOUTZRWr PEFZCML ITIFOMOTTM . w q ADDI S39 16�llJinAjC�PjeCACe /f?�e. YFAm xN cnv.- TZ M-Im MOM; 7 9,M e7 (sic luark) MEAM RMUM THIS MMYI.MIMED rm TO THE CITY SEt`AA'I'M. PUMM r= YT *FT COMPILM LY. FACET APPLIC ICI WILL BE RVT ON FUNFOR M (I) YEAR. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO ;MFXE AFTM THhT TXW-,v It YOU ARE STILL IN4ED AND AVAIIABIZ TO SM'Z ON Tim CM-MES. PLEASE LIST 'DIE BOARD OR CCEn SSXON FM WHICH YOU .CLZA LIKE TO IM CONSIDEMp USING A SEPAR'�'E FM FCR EkCH DOW) OR COhL IMSICN. AAP VBMf r DMXnD: C."r0 nQr-,); C QUAI ML-AnONS; (List a ticat=cmal backgrow4 or experience that km1d assist you in carrying out the duties o: this appointment ) 24 -n� �X�s T /.»vep� r r, Al /-l30-ro)f • �,E'v%�1'��% L c - 1 chP Cr, /PAS r AMI.ST SinPddl�S 1n��u,dc�A1 C'/�PnTS jn �:S 13lJsAIiA32t(ACXPCV1nr 46'W' •e 04.0 b 0 ALOV.S IWJ=NS FQR SF:iWD* IState briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and ycur reasons fcw wanting to servt on this $oard/caa udmion ) --- C,c.JAn •. , .��.w�w .�rr�wlww.� , � ..w ,.. AM YOU CURRkNJ.'LY SERVING CH ANY 01W 50ARD/006MISSION IN THE CITY CF SOUTMAIOat rj w ■ • w AO YOU MEERS = WN VCS jW*aSSION OPERATES ACID YOUR DU'I'YES AS AN APP0M? yes DO YCU UNDIMTX'M THAT MMMANCE AND ACTT StVVM xS REOtfi = Fit EAM APPOMEE2 , 3 a-5r ture 4 APPt n i� FEB 1 1991 ' CITY OF SOUL, TEXAS OFFICE OF _APPLICATION FOR APPOINEM N7 PERSONAL INFORMATION CITY SECRETARY NAME: eArpal �'u�%Z�/SCit% DATE: z�/ q / ADDRESS: / �-y / O�S'K1��lfQST Coal2l- YEARS IN CITY: S TELEPHONE NU14BERS : T,rs-S16 -- (ham) (work) PLEASE RETURN THIS CON,'PL= FORM TO THE CITY SECRETARY. PLEASE FILL IT OUT COMPI�.. ,Y. EACH APPLICATION WILL BE KEPT ON FILE FOR ONE (1) YEAR. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REFILE AFTER THAT TIME, IF YOU ARE STILL INTERESTED AND AWLIABLE TO SERVE ON THE COi•TLTTTEE. PLEASE LIST THE BOARD OR CC)bMSSIOP: FOR WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED, USING A SEPARATE FOR4 FOR EACH BOARD OR COP IISSION. APPOINTMENT DESIRED: �Z �✓%/C / � �D�'� J 4:r71NL1z- QUALIFICATIONS: (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment ) aD/ 7Z;7- ,ti�",�r L�.9 /� /O� / <Tw,4 il/� /�Zt S/?l�sS d/nll�if� TfL LJ /l>i4G / 9G 3 - c�v�uL avT 7a /f e �v�� a ti�D / 45�/ ei s v / 9 7 G' t t17 , 5 , ce L ls�if.�'�DJ - d7e O,d�.e47-zfVS LI/E3�:� ,9�� ,�1� : EXT/1/�/<r G+-yI7?ZU/f17?� /c.f3L�47707G$ AVW< titer' i � /�r� ��z/hiss .4r�i3c% 5�,57,4 ti t;e C.9�/ cis o Wf= d n 77rr-tJ - *-rI�0 4rrfi --,-C 6 (J REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on this Board/Commission ) f f I/?� )7�L1 7t✓�y3C� : % ARE YOU CURR_�►F'%My SERVING ON ANY OTHER BOARD/COMISSION IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE? O YOU UNDERSTAND HOX-; THIS BOARD/CMUSSION OPERATES AND YOUR DUTIES AS Al APPOINTEE? )" DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ATMMANCE AND ACTIVE SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH APPOINTEE? 01 Signatdr6 of Applicant 30 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TOCAS APPLICATION FOR APPOIMMa,'T o�� Q FEB1 1991 OFFICE OF CITY SECRETAR-4. NAME: -IC , ) -7- Ji f- . -51= , -T 171- DATE: aZ -/ - f/ ADDRESS: S 16 b 0`0.V GS KJ.YEARS IN CITY: TELEPHONE NU4BER.S : -0 -- (cme) (work) PERSONAL INFORMATION PLEASE RETURN THIS CCIPI= FORM TO THE CITY SECRETARY. PLEASE FILL IT OUT COMPLETELY. EACH APPLICATION WILL BE KEPT ON FILE FOR ONE (1) YEAR. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REF= AFTER THAT TIME, IF YOU ARE STILL INTERESTED AND AVAILABLE TO SERVE ON THE COIM=M. PLEASE LIST THE BOARD OR COMNIISSION FOR WHICH YOU WOcW LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED, USING A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH BOARD OR COMMISSION. Q ae4zo6012L)d . 0-.42 QLMLIFICATIONS: (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment ) REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on this Board/CcnTnission ) ARE YOU CUFdZM ,Y SERVING ON ANY OTHER BOARD/COMMISSION IN THE CITY OF DO YOU UNDERSmm iiOW THIS BOARD/CCx�IISSIOTI OPERATES AMID YOUR DiTTIF.S AS AN APPOINTEE? DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ATT=ANCE AND ACTIVE SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH APPOINTEE? 1/4 -,, 34-7p r 10 I City of Southlake, Texas E M 0 R A N D U M February 1, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution 91-06, Appointment to Parks Commission ------------------------------------------------------------- Currently there are two (2) openings on the Park and Recreation Board. Karen Apple, indicated that she does not wish to be considered for reappointment, and Michael Jurecka who expressed to me that he does wish to be considered for reappointment. Resolution 91-06 allows for two (2) appointments, each for three (3) year terms. The applications attached are for your consideration. I have placed a call to each of the applicants to ascertain if they are still interested in serving on the board. I have not received calls at this time, but will be prepared to report to you on Tuesday evening. If you have any questions, please give me a call. k AV ff- LL s amity of 5outhlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO.91-06 Im A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Parks and Recreation Board was created for the purpose of Planning and Developing Parks and Park sites within the City of Southlake, for the use and benefit of its citizens; and, WHEREAS, THE Parks and Recreation Board shall consist of none (9)*'members, to serve three (3) year, staggered terms; and, WHEREAS, currently there are two (2) terms that have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That all the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied if their entirety. Section 2. That the City Council hereby appointed the following members to the Board to serve for a three (3) year term, to expire in January 1994. 1. 2. Section 3. That the appointments are to be effective on the day of approval of this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , guy of Southlake, Texas Resolution 91-06 page two ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By• Gary Fickes, Mayor 3/- 3 & r�q FEB 1 1991 —' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, committee) : OFFICE OF iC= SECRETARY` commission, or ` use a separate application for each appointment aesir Name: Z YNN4' /�i P66E",e 7' y Address: loWO %�+ L SST Home Phone: 8 - Years in City: = Employer: S Phone: �/- Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake : Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: U/Y.4� &�&40Z644A Do you understi(nd and agree that your Ore gulpf`"t"e1ifa�e ah3 -CAMrve support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? q'Z�S Additional information or comments: 0 Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. signature: Date: 9//?/- Q ULU JUN 191990 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OP APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, comm*i�ssion, or committee): —(use a separate application for each appointment desired) Name Susan T PaQe- Address: ►o3to -Diamond Rl"d Home Phone: 4<31-$501 Years in City: Employer: — Phone: Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Trea-,urer-Sou44-oak" $,-ne. 11 Asnoeiafmc Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: WiSh 40 r Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: Preuicus Pin-„r iaQ 4- 2-on trio ir,n Pares 4E es%`.. in -Eha Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? uae) Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: Q Date: 4-1q-qo .31-- JON 181990 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE �rrr^ (4W APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: committee) : opp (name of board, commission, or use a parate application for each appointment ctesir Name: 0tr' A n Address: 309 So rid w Home Phone: - pZ Years in City: Employer: �' Phone: Current and/or previo s board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Sol Lkie: -Itz-p o Reasons for desiring to ,serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: /Q-1,A,Aj 0.lto��l 2 A w ' I 1 D_ D. Qualifications and experien this position: e-9 Lk)61 �r io 11 " that would assist /t SSaGJ y in serving in j Do ydu understand and agree that your regular attendance anti -9tlVe �Aa support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? de5 _ Additional information or comments: I .� Ple� urn this complete form to the City Secr tary's Office. & Each application will be kept on file for one (1) yea After that �- time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information WV-4- herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appoi401\ tment. Signature: Date: A ► CITY OF SOU'THLAKE APPLICATION FOR 'APPOINTMENT PERSONAL INFORUATION NAME: �NJ4 C . t�E�rw c x. DATE xo A'PRI i g7 ADDRESS: 1490 Ewa rald TELEPHONE NUMBER: U/698 home) S - Gsvq APPOINTMENT DESIRES (List Board/Commission for which you are being or would like to be considered for): t?A'itKs e.oMM I s S IoN QUALIFICATIONS (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment): �f {a� i.� /�1cle�:�. f��:•a:s�x�:o•1. I�aa�e. served in eydl.�•1.•i-�:kS _�/nruai.+ R+ C.ostsfra�.c �i ova o� �ecP-ea i o ��a.� .."Act spar*'��ei is � es 'C�Nec.S ko�►�' %�►t LL S �� o✓ersus REASONS FOR SERVING (State brief ly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on this Board/ Commission): "a A I k - Is -by- o dss;;sA act 4eaw+wtc�•1;jy '4t kcheav-, If uci�% i•�iano�•uaet Jo occ/- 'r- ACV _ Do you understand how this Board/Commission operates and your duties ............... as an appointee? " " e�t . Do you understand that attendance and active support is required ...............--•- for each appointee? t' S I GNED e • `�-. PLEASE RETUR14 THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE CITY SECRETARY 31- 7 1 ' CITY OF SOUrHLAKE, TEXAS tit" APPLICATION FOR APPOIN IENT PERSONAL INEX GI NAME: Michael L. Jurecka DAM /-- �- ADDRESS: 318 Dove Creek Trail, Southlake YEARS IN CITY:t 4 TE F,pHOlvTE NCR4BERS: 481-7765�530 (home) (work) PLEASE 10BJRrT THIS CONg'LEIID FORM TO THE CITY SEcr&TARY. PLEASE FILL IT OUT COMPLETELY. EACH APPLICATIOL WILL BE KE2'L ON FILE FOR ONE (1) YEAR. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REFIIS M7M THAT TIME, IF YOU ARE STILL INTERESTED AND AVAILABLE TO SERVE ON THE CC14KITTEE. PLEASE LIST THE BOARD OR CC MSSIOtd FOR WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED, USING A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH BOARD OR CM%4ISSION. APPOINTMENT DESIRED: Parks and Recreation Board QUALIFICATIONS: (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointmmnt ) Grapevine High School 1975 Graduate University of Arkansas, athletic scholarship Member BESUA (sports officiating association) REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on this Board/Ccmnission ) I care about the overall growth and development of our city and would accept responsibility with considerable commitment interest and energy. ARE YOU CURRFTTTLY SERVING ON ANY 0"=- ', BOARD/COMISSION IN THE CITY OF SOUTHI AKE? No DO YOU UNDERSTAND HC THIS BOARD/COWSISSION OPERATES AND YOUR DUTIES AS AN APPOINTEE? Yes DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ATTENDANCE AND ACTIVE SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH APPOINTEE? Yes ( r `.Q=�ce_ Signature o Applicant 30-7 City Of 01-1�-y�=i-11 e Texas January 28, 1991 Curtis Hawk City Manager 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: Since the metering system on the sanitary sewer line that serves the Big Bear drainage area is not yet operational, we need to amend the contract between the Cities of Colleyville and Southlake to provide for an alternative method of calculating the sewer flows. I have attached for your Council's consideration a proposed amend- ment to the contract that should cover this situation. This is the same formula used by the Trinity River Authority in similar situations. I would appreciate you recommending adoption of the contract amendment by your City Council. I plan to make a similar recommendation to the Colleyville City Council at their February 5th meeting. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please let me know. Sincerely, C. Robert Stripling City Manager Enclosure P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 281-4044 30? -/ ADDENDUM TO INTERIM WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENT COLLEYVILLE - SOUTHLARE This Addendum is made on this the day of , 1991, by and between the City of Colleyville, a home -rule municipal corporation in Tarrant County, Texas, (hereinafter "Colleyville"), and the City of Southlake, a home -rule municipal corporation in Tarrant County, Texas, (hereinafter "Southlake"). WHEREAS, Colleyville and Southlake entered into an Interim Wastewater Service Agreement dated March 27, 1990, (hereinafter "Agreement"), pursuant to which Southlake was allowed access to a sanitary sewer line owned by the City of Colleyville which serves the Big Bear drainage area of the City of Colleyville ("Colleyville line"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Agreement, Southlake was to construct metering stations for the purpose of determining the flow of wastewater into the Colleyville line from Southlake at each point of entry; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Southlake was to pay to the City of Colleyville a sum of money computed under the terms of the Agreement based upon the wastewater flows from Southlake into the Colleyville line for as long as Colleyville owns the Colleyville line after December 31, 1990; and 1 _RV 02 WHEREAS, Southlake has not completed construction of the metering stations to meter the flow into the Colleyville line; and WHEREAS, Colleyville and Southlake wish to add this Addendum to the Interim Wastewater Service Agreement to allow the parties to provide for an alternate method of determining the wastewater flows into the Colleyville line until the metering stations are completed; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: Reaffirmation Colleyville and Southlake hereby reaffirm all of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained in the Interim Wastewater Service Agreement dated March 27, 1990, between Colleyville and Southlake except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Addendum. Modification of Paragraph 2.2 The Agreement is hereby modified by adding the following language to the end of paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement: "In the event Southlake has not completed construction of its metering stations, the amount of wastewater flow introduced into the Colleyville line by Southlake shall be computed for each month by determining on the last day of each month in which flows are introduced into the Colleyville line by Southlake, the number of single family residences, occupied or unoccupied, which have sanitary sewer connections which may 2 3,=?, _3 result in the introduction of wastewater flows into the Colleyville line from the residence. Said number of single family residences shall be multiplied by 315 gallons and the product of that multiplication shall be deemed to be the number of gallons of wastewater introduced into the Colleyville line per day in that month for the purpose of computing the sums owed by Southlake to Colleyville pursuant to paragraph 3.3 of this Agreement." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum is executed on the date first above written. ATTEST: City Secretary ATTEST: City Secretary By: By: 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE 3�2—�e ICity of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 5, 1991 7 L-111 11 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the January 15, 1991, City Council Meeting, and the Special City Council Meeting held on January 21, 1991, to Canvass the Election. 3. Mayor's Report 4. City Manager's Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Council member or citizen so request, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business, and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consider: Resolution 91-04, Calling the General Election to be held on May 4, 1991. 6. Consider: Resolution 91-07, in support of the D.A.R.E. Program for the City of Southlake. 7. Consider: Resolution 91-08, in support of the Reconstruction Project on State Highway 114. 8. Consider: Resolution 91-09, authorizing use of credit cards for payments at city hall. 9. Consider: Authorizing advertisement for bids for a renovation project at city hall. 10. Consider: Authorizing advertisement for bids for a tow -paver for Public Works Department. REGULAR AGENDA 11. A. Public Forum. B. Public Appearance. Vernie Henderson, Manager, Lone Star Gas Company. j 11 H [a City of Southlake, Texas City Council Agenda February 5, 1991 page two 12. Consider: Contract with BFI Waste Systems for a Recycling Program for Southlake. 13. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-39, 2nd reading (ZA 90-69). A zoning change for 3.267 acres out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 4C. The property is located East of South White Chapel Blvd., approximately 2,200 feet South of FM 1709. Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for the SF-lA Zoning District. Owner: Wilfred and Veronika Anderson. Public Hearing. 14. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-38, 2nd reading (ZA 90-66). Zoning change request for a 14.0748 acres out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tracts 1C and 1C3, being located at the Northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Blvd., and West Southlake Blvd. Current zoning is Commercial-2 and the requested zoning is S-P-2 (generalized). Site Plan District. Owners: Trustees, E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust and the Estate of J.F. Schnitzer, Inetta Schnitzer, Executrix. Applicant: PIMA Properties. Public Hearing. 15. Consider: ZA 90-72, a Revised Preliminary Plat of Block 6, SouthRidge lakes, being described as 20.37 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. This lot is the Commercial-3 site at the Northeast corner of North Peytonville Avenue and West Southlake Blvd. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II 16. Consider: ZA 90-73, Final plat of Block 6, Lots 1 and 2, SouthRidge Lakes, representing approximately 4.31 acres out of the revised 20.37 acre preliminary plat. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. 17. Consider: ZA 90-74, a request for Site Plan (La Petite Day Care) approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The request is for the proposed Lot 2, Block 6, SouthRidge Lakes, being 0.95 acres. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. 18. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-C, 1st reading. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Continuation of the Public Hearing. 19. Discussion: Southcrest Court median revisions, Phase I of SouthView Addition. j n vny v� vvuu nar�c� � cnao I I I LI I f City Council Agenda February 5, 1991 page three 20. Discussion: Proposed revisions to the Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, to include realignment of the proposed thoroughfare. 21. Consider: Developers Agreement for Monticello Estates. 22. Consider: Authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract for vendor services and electric scoreboards for Bicentennial Park, at the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Board. 23. Consider: Award of bid for vehicles for Public Works Department. 24. Consider: Ordinance No. 522-A, 1st reading. Amending Ordinance No. 522, in regards to Court of Record. 25. Consider: Authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract with Tarrant County for reconstruction of Highland from Shady Oaks Drive to Kimball Avenue, and South Kimball Avenue from Southlake Blvd. to East Continental Blvd. 26. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Section 2(e) 2(f) 2(g). Refer to posted list. A. Discussion: Pending or contemplated litigations. (Refer to posted list). B. Discussion: Personnel Matters, including Boards and Commissions (Refer to posted list). C. Discussion: Land Acquisition. D. Return to Open Session. 27. Consider: Action necessary in regards to pending or contemplated litigations. (Refer to posted list) 28. Consider: Action necessary in regards to personnel matters, including Boards and Commissions (Refer to posted list). 29. Consider: Action necessary in regards to land acquisition. Li U 11 C� L� U 11 D I i' City Council Agenda February 5, 1991 page four 30. Consider: Resolution 91-05, appointment to Southlake Economic Development Council (SEDC). 31. Consider: Resolution 91-06, appointment to the Park and Recreation Board. 32. Consider: Amending Colleyville/Southlake Interim Wastewater Service Agreement. 33. Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin board at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 1, 1991 at 6:00 p.m., pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. sanara L. Leura City Secretary E I I LY - Utl 111 1 -- L r� P 11 M C� P P 11 A law EXECUTIVE SESSION DVDClIATMVT_ The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, Municipal Court Judge and City Boards and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions are on file in the City Secretary's Office. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City Council. PENDING LITIGATION The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Ray L. Whitmore, Louis Messina and Marie J. Robinson V. City of Southlake, 1980. 2. Russell Sivey v. City of Southlake. September, 1989. CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION 3. Margaret Freemen Claim. January, 1990. 4. West Beach Addition 5. Andert Lawsuit. Litigation is, by nature, an on -going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasion, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects, in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this City Council Meeting, an executive session will be held. SLL 1/11/91 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. Carroll Avenue k4VMW REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 5, 1991 7:30 p.m. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Gary Fickes; Mayor Pro Tem Betty Springer. Members: W. Ralph Evans, Jerry Farrier, Rick Wilhelm, and Sally Hall. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager; Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety; Michael Barnes, Director of Public Works; Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Greg Last, City Planner; Don Wilson, Fire Chief; Wayne K. Olson, City Attorney; and Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. INVOCATION: Councilmember W. Ralph Evans. The work session was called to order at 6:30 p.m. where Councilmembers present reviewed the agenda items for tonight's meeting. The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Gary Fickes. Agenda Item #2, Approval of Minutes The Minutes of the January 15, 1991, City Council meeting were approved as corrected. Motion: Farrier Second: Springer Ayes: Farrier, Springer, Evans, Wilhelm, Hall. Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. The Minutes of the Special City Council meeting of January 21, 1991, held to canvass the election held on January 19, 1991 were approved as presented. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Springer Ayes: Wilhelm, Springer, Evans, Hall Nays: None Abstention: Farrier Approved: 4-0-1 vote. _ Agenda Item #3, Mayor's Report Mayor Fickes announced that he attended a meeting of the Tarrant County Mayor's Council and was informed that the County approved 1.7 million dollars for the continuation of the purchase of right-of-way on FM 1709. Judge Vandergriff since taking office, has taken a lead roll in seeing that this project is complete. L I City Council Minutes kw February 5, 1991 page two Agenda Item #3, Continued Also, at the Mayor's Council meeting, a county wide ambulance service was discussed, and we will be hearing more about this in the future. The Mayor stated he prefers that a joint ambulance service involving Southlake would be for this area only, and not a county wide program. Mayor Fickes announced that several days ago, he, Mayor Pro Tem Springer, and Councilmember Sally Hall had a meeting with Planned Cable Company, where they presented Planned Cable with a demand letter expressing the displeasure Council is feeling with the quality of service Southlake is getting from them. He stated that it might be advantageous for Southlake to seek other cable companies in the near future, if service doesn't improve. Fickes announced the General Election which will be held in Southlake on May 4, 1991, adding that the first day a citizen can file to have his name placed on the ballot is February 18, with the last day being March 20. The Office of Mayor, three Council seats, and that of Judge of Municipal Court will be on the ballot. The Mayor referenced a letter Council received from Barry Johnson from Whispering Dell Estates, in regards to drainage problems he is Lr-W having. The Mayor noted the Regional Drainage Study which is being discussed with the City of Keller, City of Colleyville, and City of Grapevine, and Southlake. An announcement was made that on February 21, Commissioner Bob Hampton, Precinct #3, will be speaking at the Keller Chamber of Commerce monthly luncheon, for those who are interested. Southlake Economic Development Council sent out surveys through out the City in an effort to get citizen desires in regards to retail development. They would appreciate your input so that they can place the information into a data base. They would like the surveys to be returned by February 15. Tarrant County Day will be held in Austin, where representatives from the ten area Chamber of Commerce memberships will be present. The main topic of discussion will be Public Education. April is National Volunteer Month, where outstanding volunteers in each city are recognized on a couple of occasions. Anyone can nominate someone who you feel is deserving of this honor. For a nomination form and other details, contact Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary. The deadline is March 1. Mayor Pro Tem Springer offered her congratulations to Mayor Fickes who was named Citizen of the Year during the Annual Chamber of .,. Commerce Banquet, held on February 2, 1991. City Council Minutes r,w February 5, 1991 page three Agenda Item #4, City Manager's Report Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager, announced that the sewer line in Continental Park Estates is now complete, which is a major accomplishment for Southlake. If it stops raining, within 60 days we can get the roads fixed. Consent Agenda #5,#6, #7, #8, #9, #10. The consent agenda was discussed, including: 5. Resolution 91-04, Calling the General Election to be held on May 4, 1991. 6. Resolution 91-07, in support of the D.A.R.E. Program for the City of Southlake. 7. Resolution 91-08, in support of the Reconstruction Project on State Highway 114. 8. Resolution 91-09, authorizing use of credit cards for payments at city hall. 9. Authorizing advertisement for bids for renovation project at city hall. 10. Authorizing advertisements for bids for a tow -paver for Public Works Department. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda as listed above. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Hall Ayes: Wilhelm, Hall, Springer, Evans, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. Agenda Item #11, Public Forum A. Public Forum: Mike Totin, 919 Emerald Blvd. Mr. Totin nominated Dennis Minder for the Volunteer Award. He stated that Mr. Minder is a member of the Southlake Volunteer Fire Department among other things, and is deserving of this award. He stated that he recently joined the Volunteer Fire Department and stated they are in need of volunteers. The City only has three (3) (paid) firefighters on duty per shift and is often in need of help. He feels the city should give a financial "break" to those in Southlake who have been called to serve our Country. B. Public Appearance: Company. Vernie Henderson, Manager, Lone Star Gas J U L Of City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page four Agenda Item #11, Continued Mayor Fickes noted that he has had calls in regards to gas shortages in Southlake during the last weeks, and invited Mr. Henderson to speak to the Council and Audience in regards to this issue. Mr. Henderson used transparencies to show the various gas pressures during the time of the shortages. He read a statement explaining the facts which led up to the shortages. Mayor Fickes asked for a letter from the president of the company, addressing our problems in Southlake, as we need to be assured that there will be adequate gas in the future. Fickes stated that Mr. Henderson and Lone Star Gas Company needs to be aware of how Southlake is growing and our need to have adequate service. Karen Reynolds, 1860 Hunters Creek, addressed her problem with Lone Star Gas Company on the day of the outage. Agenda Item #12, Contract with BFI Waste System/Recycling Program The City Manager informed Council that as of this time BFI Waste System has not returned the contract for Council review. The Council has previously agreed to work with BFI for a Recycling Program which is to begin on April 1. Motion was made to continue the consideration of the contract with BFI during the February 19, 1991 City Council Meeting. Motion: Hall Second: Springer Ayes: Hall, Springer, Evans, Farrier, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #13, Ordinance No. 480-39, 2nd reading (ZA 90-69) A zoning change for a 3.267 acre tract of land out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 4C. The property is located east of South White Chapel Blvd., approximately 2,200 feet south of FM 1709. Current zoning is Agricultural, request is for the SF-lA Zoning District. Owners: Wilfred and Veronika Anderson. Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy made a presentation, stating that ten (10) letters were sent to property owners within 200' and she received one (1) reply. On January 15, the City Council approved the 1st reading by a 5-0 vote. The public hearing resulted with no comments from the audience. r, City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page five Agenda Item #13, Continued Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-39, 2nd reading. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Farrier Mayor Fickes read the caption of Ordinance No. 480-39. Ayes: Wilhelm, Farrier, Evans, Springer, Hall Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. Councilmember Rick Wilhelm stepped down for agenda item #14. Agenda Item #14, Ordinance No. 480-38, 2nd reading (ZA 90-66 A zoning change request for a 14.0748 acre tract of land out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, Tracts 1C and 1C3. Current zoning is Commercial-2 and the requested zoning is S-P-2 (generalized) Site Plan District. Owners: Trustees, E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust and the Estate of J.F. Schnitzer, Inetta Schnitzer, Executrix. Applicant: PIMA Properties. Mrs. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated that fourteen (14) letters were sent to property owners within 200'. She received a petition on January 15, with 156 names, only four (4) of the property owners were within 200'. The protest represents approximately 10% of the property owners. On January 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the S-P-2 Site Plan District; and on January 15, City Council approved the 1st reading of Ordinance No. 480-38, by a 4-0 vote. David McMahan, PIMA Properties, was present to answer questions for the Council. He stated it is their desire to build a 125,000 square feet anchor, in a major grocery store. He added that they have attempted to take out the offensive uses from the zoning district. He understands that they will have to present a detailed site plan prior to building permits being issued. Public Hearin Keith Letsinger, 804 Pearl Drive. Mr. Letsinger stated that he continues to believe that City Council should vote to deny the request. Now he believes that it must be denied as a matter of law, due to the fact that the site plan which was submitted with the application was not in accordance with the requirements in the ordinance. To support the statement, he referred to Ordinance No. 480, Section 40.1; Section 40.3b; and, Section 32.4c. Section 40 deals with Site Plan, and Section 32 deals with S-P-2 zoning. Mr. ow Letsinger added that this is the first application for S-P-2, and he feels it is wrong to allow acceptance at this time. City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page six Agenda Item #14, Continued Mr. Letsinger stated he feels at this time, the alternatives are for the applicant to either resubmit a completed application or to amend the wording of the ordinance. City Attorney, Wayne K. Olson, stated that it is his understanding that this application and site plan have met the requirements as outlined in the ordinance. The detailed site plan must be 11 H presented at the time of application for building permits. Staff also feels that the site plan has met the requirements of the ordinance at this time. Mr. Letsinger commented that the application was made three (3) to four (4) weeks before the amendment to the ordinance was approved. Also, that a sign is to be placed on the property being considered for zoning change and a sign has not been placed on the property. He feels that a conflict exists and that City Council should vote no on this case. Mayor Fickes feels we must follow the advice of the City Attorney. We can make this center something that will be good for the area. The key to a major center is a major anchor. The City Council will demand that the developer do the project right. Mr. Letsigner stated he does not think that S-P-2 is the right zoning for this area. Randall Boyd, 807 Pearl. Mr. Boyd stated that he has invested time and money and has a legal interpretation of our ordinances. He feels a signal was sent on the bond election. Do the results of the bond election change the view point for improvements on North White Chapel? Mayor Fickes stated he feels the conditions of our roads and the failing of the bond election are crimes. In regards to FM 1709, the city has been told that if the right of way is acquired, within eighteen (18) months, the section from Wall Street to FM 1938 will be completed for widening. Then within six (6)months later, Phase 2 which is FM 1938 through Keller, will begin. The Mayor added that the property in question has been zoned Commercial for twenty-two (22) years. Kathy Letsinger, 804 Pearl Drive. She stated that it is not the fact that the citizens do not want roads, or that the citizens are not willing to pay the taxes, the people did not like the way the bond election was marketed. She stated they received a brochure two days prior to the election. Mayor Fickes agreed that it was a problem getting the word out to the voters. City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page seven Agenda Item #14, Continued Councilmember Sally Hall stated for the record, when this bond timing was presented, she felt as the citizens did, that Council did not have sufficient time to get the information out to the public. She personally was not pleased with the time frame. David Stoner, 813 Pearl. Mr. Stoner stated that after the last meeting, the home owners in Diamond Circle Estates decided that they wanted to pursue the issue further, so they went out and obtained outside council. They wanted to get the best, so they found an attorney who has 22 years experience in Municipal Government in the local area. The results of what Keith Letsinger presented was the opinion of this attorney. Stoner stated that the site plan presented does not address the provisions for drainage, fire hydrants, safety, a 50' sign, or fast food establishments. He would like to know if Council would eliminate the pads out front of the center. Mayor Fickes stated that Council has met with the developer and asked him all the same questions as the concerns of the property owners. At this time we are dealing with zoning only, not with the other issues. Public Hearing closed. City Attorney, Wayne Olson stated that he stands by his earlier opinion. If the site plan is submitted under Section 32, Council has the legal right to vote on this issue. Councilmember Sally Hall asked that City Council consider some of the concerns of the citizens. Councilmember Jerry Farrier stated that he agrees with Councilmember Hall and with the citizens: however, to deny or stall this issue now, would open the door for C-2 and under that zoning district, this would give the developer the right to do more without coming to council. David McMahan wanted to point out once again that this is a zoning issue. As it related to fast food, he does not agree. The plans are not for this kind of use. But to limit the developer would not be in the best interest of the center. He feels we can over limit the uses in the center very quickly. j n City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page eight Agenda Item #14, continued The City Attorney has concerns that City Council could eliminate fast food restaurants. If City Council does not want a particular use, it needs to decide it today. Fred Dicinti , 1038 Diamond. He stated that fast food stores have a habit of littering up and down the street. He suggested that drive in windows be eliminated to a percentage of the use of the store. Councilmember Farrier noted that he feels taking away "fast food" with the zoning is not the right tool for this action. Motion was made to approve Ordinane NO. 480-38, 2nd reading. Motion: Farrier Second: Evans Mayor Fickes read the caption of the Ordinance. Ayes: Farrier, Evans, Springer Nays: Hall Approved: 3-1 vote. Councilmember Rick Wilhelm returned to the Council table. Council adjourned for recess at 10:20 p.m. Council returned to open session at 10:40 p.m. Agenda Item #15, ZA 90-72 Revised Preliminary Plat for Arvida The revised Preliminary Plat of Block 6, SouthRidge Lakes, being described as 20.37 acres of land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, was presented to Council. The lot is the Commercial-3 site at the Northeast corner of North Peytonville Avenue, and West Southlake Blvd. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P.II. IL Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, noted that thirteen (13) letters were sent to property owners within 2001, and no responses were received. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this preliminary plat on January 17 ,1991. Councilmember Rick Wilhelm noted that one of his clients is Las Colinas Land Limited Partnership. One of it's partners in an affiliate of JMB Realty, and one of the owners of Arvida is an affiliate of JMB. He does not represent JMB or the affiliate. He has discussed this issue with the City Attorney, and they agree that acting on this item is not a conflict of interest. L 4W I FI- City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page nine Agenda Item #15, Continued Councilmember Sally Hall stated that years ago, when Arvida came in originally it was discussed extensively that they wanted the road to access the commercial development out on the Arvida subdivision, so that the people wishing to utilize the commercial would not have to come out onto FM 1709 and immediately come back into the commercial development. She stated that it is not fair to anyone for Arvida to change their plan. Sean Randall, Arvida. Mr. Randall stated that whenever they dedicate common area to a homeowners association they always reserve easements in order to come back and do necessary work in the area, such as water line, cable television, or a private access driveway. They have the unanimous support of the property owners in Arvida to not put in a private access road for LaPetite. Mayor Fickes commented that the developer needs to make sure the people who buy in their subdivision are fully informed on the plans for the addition, so that property owners in the future will know the plan before they purchase the property. Mark Duphorn, 112 San Jacinto, SouthRidge Lakes Development. He was instrumental in developing the petition which was signed by property owners from SouthRidge Lakes Development. He speaks for all of them. They are aware of the commercial property and of the traffic which will result from the commercial property and the traffic that will be behind any structure, backing up to the commercial lots. They are concerned for the main reasons as listed: 1) increased traffic using SouthRidge Lakes Parkway as an alternate route from the commercial area. 2) increased traffic due to the new high school. 3) location of the access road, which is across from the community center. The homeowners are concerned for the safety of the neighborhood children who will be using the activity area. Mayor Fickes stated that the main purpose of an access road is to give the residents a safe way to get into the center, as the main concern is entering and exiting onto the Parkway itself. The Mayor noted that the city will not build a road. c L low L n City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page ten Agenda Item #15, Continued Mayor Fickes commented that the easement is there, and that the developer will have to build the road. Motion was made to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the January 29, 1990, engineers letter. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Evans Ayes: Wilhelm, Evans, Springer, Hall, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #16, ZA 90-73, Final Plat of Block 6, Lots 1 & 2, SouthRidge Lake The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, made the presentation in regards to a 4.31 acre tract of land out of a 20.37 acre tract of land, in the Final plat of Block 6, Lots 1 & 2, SouthRidge Lakes Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the final plat on January 17, 1991, subject to the Cheatham review letter dated January 8, 1991. Motion was made to approve the Final Plat of Block 6, Lots 1 & 2, SouthRidge Lakes, subject to the January 29, 1991 review letter. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Springer Ayes: Wilhelm, Springer, Hall, Farrier, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #17, ZA 90-74. Site Plan for La Petite Day Care Center A request for approval of a site plan for LaPetite Day Care Center was presented to Council. This action is necessary prior to the issuance of a building permit according to Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator. The request is for the proposed Lot 2, Block 6, SouthRidge Lakes, being 0.95 acre tract of land. Mrs. Gandy noted that they propose a 6,600' building which is proposed for 155 students. Nine (9) letters were sent to property owners within 200' and she received one (1) response from C.L. Pinson. Lloyd Martinson, a property owner within 200' expressed concern about the noise in the area. On January 17, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the request by a 6-0 vote, subject to staff comments in a letter dating January 8, 1991, omitting #2 in regards to fire lanes. LI City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page eleven Agenda Item #17, Continued John Levitt, Levitt Engineers, 726 Commerce, #104, Southlake. Mr. Levitt noted in regard to the turn around at the end, the fire hydrant is on the southwest corner of the tract and he has no problem with a deceleration lane. The City Manager, Curtis Hawk, expressed that he has a problem with backing up on FM 1709. The reason for the temporary turn around is for use until they have access to the rest of the development. Fire Chief, Don Wilson, commented that they need the access easement, and a cul-de-sac is being recommended as a temporary solution. Motion was made to approve the site plan subject to; #1, compliance with the January 29, 1991 letter;#2, that there is a turn around at the end of the street, or some other method acceptable to the Fire Department; U , deceleration lane into the entrance; #4, this does not imply approval of the sign that is shown on the site plan. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Farrier Ayes: Wilhelm, Farrier, Springer, Evans, Hall Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #18, Ordinance No. 480-C, is reading. Amendments to Ordinance No. 480. Motion was made to table Ordinance No. 480-C, time certain February 19, 1991, and to continue the public hearing at that time. Motion: Springer Second: Evans Ayes: Springer, Evans, Hall, Wilhelm, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote (to table) Agenda Item #19, Southcrest Court median revisions, Phase I SouthView Addition. Mayor Fickes suggested that the developers of the addition and the Post Office meet to discuss this issue of the median on Southcrest Court, bringing their suggestions back to City Council during the Council meeting to be held on February 19, 1991. I� City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page twelve Agenda Item #20, Discussion: Proposed Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Realignment A discussion was held in regards to the proposed revisions to the Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, to include realignment of the proposed thoroughfare. Sean Randall, Arvida, started off by stating that as a condition of the zoning approval of Arvida, the City required that Arvida build a four (4) lane thoroughfare. This effort was to comply with a city wide thoroughfare plan which depicted SouthRidge Lakes Parkway as extending south across FM 1709 to eventually connect to Continental Blvd. He believes that several factors have changed since Arvida received approval nearly two (2) years ago. First of all, SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will never extend past Southlake Blvd. It may never have a traffic signal at the entrance to SouthRidge Lakes Blvd. Their traffic study indicates that there may never be a need for this thoroughfare. He did and does anticipate that improvements will be necessary to the Old Peytonville Avenue. Councilmember Wilhelm stated that he feels we cannot look at this as an isolated situation, it has to be looked at as the entire area, therefore, that included looking at Peytonville Avenue and the need for a 84' four (4) lane divided roadway. Michael Barnes, Director of Public Works noted that he fees a 64' right of way would be adequate, however, a study needs to be done to determine that. At this time, he does not feel a four (4) lane road would be necessary. Councilmember Farrier commented that one of the bigger issues that needs to be resolved is allowing a developer to change the game plan after a plan has been approved. Taking; away a significant design feature that has impact on the total community. He feels there is an integrity issue that needs to be dealt with. Farrier stated that he feels when the City Council said they wanted the road to go south, they did so to carry a certain volume of traf f is in good faith that this is what needed to be done. Because the City Council did not allow for the road to go south, they have cut down on the potential traffic, which works to the homeowners benefit. Farrier continued, that just because City Council curtailed some of the traffic, does that relinquish the developer from his responsibility. Farrier feels this is a serious issue. He cannot look at any of the proposals and feel that they will benefit the citizens more than in Proposal "A". This is the issue to him. Councilmember Wilhelm commented that there is no question that Proposal "A" is the ultimate for Southlake, but the question is, is aw it realistic. When you tell someone to do something and two (2) I City Council Minutes kw February 5, 1991 page twelve -A years later the plan has changed and City Council changed the plan by not going to the south with the road. Farrier stated he feels that Arvida did a tremendous sales job with the development. He feels the boulevard is an amenity that the developer sold to the community and now they are changing that plan. Sean Randall stated he feels that a mistake was made by building this four (4) lane road and he does not want to make the mistake again by building this four (4) lane road to nowhere. Gene Femiano, 309 SouthRidge Parkway. Mr. Femiano stated that property owners in SouthRidge Lakes Addition would like to see the plan changed as they feel the size of the roadway is not needed. He feels it would be in the best interest of the community to change the plan. Scott Morrison, 210 Donley Court. Mr. Morrison commented that in his mind there is an integrity issue. He noted the traffic study that Mr. Randall referenced. Tom O'Mally, 202 SouthRidge Parkway. Mr. O'Mally stated that all prior information has passed in regard to the parkway. We now have a new High School. All the things have changed. Fred Joyce, Randol Mill Road. Mr. Joyce stated that he does not have an opinion at this time. He personally would like the road to stay the way it was. He would like to hold the option to state his opinion in the future. He feels the city seems pretty well set on a 60' right of way on Old Peytonville Avenue. Councilmember Hall stated she agrees with Mr. Farrier, she feels that this road should continue as four (4) lanes , she does not necessarily need the access roads. She still needs a four lane road, as she needs that continuity. When Arvida presented this program, they went through the discussion of safety, continuity and integrity. The city asked for stubs going east and west, and Arvida did not want to do this for security reasons. This was another reason that the four lane road was brought up. Mayor Pro Tem Springer stated she agreed with Ms. Hall. Farrier remembers the citizens questioning the safety issues and statements were made that he can't attribute to the developer or Arvida, that Arvida did not have problems with the roadway, but that they would probably use that to delineate levels of quality within the subdivision with higher group housing on one side than on the other and that the roadway would serve as a social divider. Mayor Fickes directed the City Staff to meet with Arvida and work together to come up with ideas for solutions to this problem. I City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page thirteen Agenda Item #20, Continued Debbie Farrier, 1336 Glen Cove, Cross Timber Hills. Mrs. Farrier stated she appreciates the people who have moved into SouthRidge Lakes Addition and say that this is their home. When Mr. Randall stated that he has talked with the people on Peytonville, he did talk to Mr. Farrier, but not to any other property owners on Peytonville that she is aware of. She expressed concerns about the trees on Peytonville. She expressed that most of this is because the game plan has changed. Mayor Fickes stated that we will consider this in the future, after discussions with the developers and city staff have taken place. Agenda Item #21, Developers Agreement/Monticello Estates The Developers Agreement for Monticello Estates was discussed. Larry Cole, developer, was present to answer questions for Council. Mike Barnes, Director of Public Works, explained that item #6 in the agreement in reference to Payment/Performance Bonds was discussed. The developer is asking not to comply with this requirement as he is not going to be applying for Building Permits prior to completion of the addition. A discussion was held in regard to the pro-rata park fee. With 54 lots @$500 per lot, the total is $27,000. He is asking for a 50% credit. Larry Cole, 4108 Greenway Court, Colleyville. Mr. Cole discussed the conditions involving the statue of Thomas Jefferson to be erected at the entrance in Monticello. A copy of the specifications is attached to the minutes. It was noted that because of the large amount of acreage used as open space, plus the cost of improving that area, Council felt that this is sufficient to allow the maximum amount of credit. Motion was made to approve the Developers Agreement for Monticello subject to 50% credit park dedication; waiver of payment for performance bonds; pro -rata sewer and perimeter road fee. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Springer Ayes: Wilhelm, Springer, Hall, Evans, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #22, Contract for Vendor Services/Scoreboard for Park Mike Barnes, Director of Public Works, stated that the Park and 11 Recreation Board recommends the City Council authorize a At contractual agreement with Dr. Pepper Corporation for Soft Drink AW Vendor and Electric Scoreboards for Bicentennial Park. i City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 page fourteen Agenda Item #22, Continued Motion was made to approve the agreement provided City Staff prepare an agreement that will meet the city attorney's approval, as directed by City Council. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Evans Ayes: Wilhelm, Evans, Hall, Springer, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #23, Award of Bid for Vehicles for Public Works Mike Barnes presented a bid tabulation and specifications for three (3) 3/4 ton pickup trucks and two (2) extended cab pickup trucks. He noted that the bids were opened on January 1, at 10:00 a.m. The information presented is hereby incorporated into the Minutes of the meeting. Motion was made to accept the recommendation of the Director of Public Works and to reject the bids for the extendcabs and to readvertise for two (2) 3.9 six cylinder trucks, accepting the low bid for three (3) 3/4 ton pickup trucks. Motion: Springer Second: Evans Ayes: Springer, Evans, Hall, Wilhelm, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #24, Ordinance No. 522-A, 1st reading. Court of Record Ordinance No. 522-A, amending Ordinance No. 522, Establishing the Court of Record is being considered in 1st reading, setting the term of office for Judge of Court of Record for two (2) years and allowing for setting the compensation for the Judge. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 522-A, 1st reading. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Hall Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Wilhelm, Hall, Springer, Farrier, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote 0 City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 kw page fifteen Agenda Item #25, Contract w/Tarrant County for Road Reconstruction Mike Barnes stated that in the 1990-91 budget, two streets are scheduled to be reconstructed by Tarrant County. The streets are Highland from Shady Oaks Drive to Kimball Avenue, and South Kimball Avenue from Southlake Blvd. to Continental Blvd., for a total budget cost of $138,000. A copy of the Barnes memorandum in regard to this item is hereby attached to the minutes. Motion was made to approve the recommendation of the City Staf f in regard to reconstruction of Highland and Kimball. Motion: Hall Second: Wilhelm Ayes: Hall, Wilhelm, Springer, Evans, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #26, Executive Session Mayor Gary Fickes announced that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Council convened in closed session at 2:07 a.m. Council returned to open session at 3:00 a.m. Agenda Item #27, Action Necessary/Litigation No action was taken on this item as the result of the executive session. Agenda Item #28, Action Necessary/Personnel Matters No action was taken on this item as the result of the executive session. Agenda Item #29, Action Necessary/Land Acquisition i Motion was made to purchase the easement on the property. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Farrier Ayes: Wilhelm, Farrier, Hall, Springer, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Chin J. Chang I City Council Minutes February 5, 1991 kw page sixteen Agenda Item #30, Resolution 91-05, Appt. to SEDC Motion was made to approve Resolution 91-05, naming Ruth Smith, David Bergman, and Phillip Bressinck to the Southlake Economic Development Council, with Rick Wilhelm being reappointed as Council representative for 1991. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Farrier Ayes: Wilhelm, Farrier, Evans, Hall, Springer Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #31, Resolution 91-06, Appt. to Park Commission Motion was made to approve Resolution 91-06, naming Lynne Haggerty as the new member of the Parks Commission, and reappointing Michael Jurecka to another 3 year term. Both terms will expire in January, 1994. Motion: Springer Second: Hall Ayes: Springer, Hall, Farrier, Evans, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #32, Amendment to Colleyville/Southlake Interim Wastewater Service Agreement Motion was made to approve the amended Colleyville/Southlake Interim Wastewater Service Agreement as presented. Motion: Farrier Second: Evans Ayes: Farrier, Evans, Springer, Hall, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #33, Adjournment. Mayor Fickes adjourned the meeting at 3:05 a.m. yoreYaly7icket— ATTAST: %Z?, Sandra L. LeGra City Secretary s �9R1111111F l",a rn a us v k3l - =� i 91) �1 = Nn a Li �c� b z s c n_ rrnn -A o' Ii rl D L .80, THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF )�J2.WAK- I- I, '�1C41A2U V IUI-VU(Aas a member of the ft L'oUV)e--4 k make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the Following: I, —V E turf 1 those awe degined irt r � k� ✓� GLon� � e�4� W �2� i-�-� �'� gPP1►ca ✓i f o-x VVIUc 4C4- S CLCSoG (name and address)- �cL e following reasons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting st or shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,0 or more of the fair market value of the busi ss entity. Funds received from thq A: usiness entity exceed 10% of gross income for :.Me previous year. Real property is, -`involved and have an equ bLble or legal ownership with a fair market valuof at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the bus )11ess entity or property that would be affected by' a decision of the public body of which I am a Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever. Signed this day of Fe- 19 9 / . 7 �a, rC. h 0 � L i a A (- Lu-� irk►-csfi 4f-j� P� Imo' " rk ✓O !G� Signature of official C� C�vrru,C' Title BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared &�g.1 � h) 1AI /,�f , and on oath stated that the hi facts erenab a stated are true to the best of (� aw knowledge or belief. Swor 11nd subscribed to before me on this day of ► 19 L- s------------ fv�,r±� SAN 3RA L. L, �j Notary Public in and or 4 .. S i ATE Tr= AS `� PAy Comm. Exp. Cyst /93 the State o f Texas My Commission Expires: Type/Print Notary's Name H E L '.or j WASHIN'GTON& ASSOCIATES, I NC. ENGINEERS e PLANNERS 1720 HE:*LemF-w5 I -ro nAc-K of Cdm i 9.5 9.5 ( 5 -7 SUB ACT: ki L- 121 I I "Mill �i�� s■ City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M o� f February 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TARRANT COUNTY CONTRACT to RECONSTRUCT HIGHLAND & KIMBALL ----------------------------------------------------------- In the 1990-91 budget, two streets are scheduled to be reconstructed by Tarrant County crews. The streets are Highland from Shady Oaks to Kimball ($97,500) and South Kimball, from Southlake Blvd. to Continental ($40,500) for a total budget cost of $138,000. Tarrant County informed the City last Friday that they are ready to start to work on February 11, 1991. This has caught the City by surprise because the work was scheduled to start in June of this year. Before work begins, testing of the existing soil should be analyzed to see what kind of material exists. If the subgrade is a clay type soil with PI's averaging above 30, then the subgrade will be lime stabilized. If the subgrade is a sandy type soil with PI's averaging below 20, then it may be the staff's recommendation to install 6" of base material instead of the lime stabilization. To install the 6" of base material would cost an additional $60,000 for the two streets combined. If the Council approves the additional cost for the base material, it would not be installed until the staff consulted with the soil laboratory and verified that method would give the street a long life. The testing company is presently in the process of testing Kimball and the results should be completed by Friday, February 8, 1991. With the above scenario in mind, it would be staff's recommendation to request from the Council to authorize the staff to install the 6" of base material in lieu of lime or cement stabilization if the soils' report recommends that method. The additional funds would be paid from the infrastructure reserve account. l H U D j City of Southlake, Texas ' Curtis E. Hawk February 1, 1991 Page 2 Attached is the contract from Tarrant County authorizing them to perform the work on Highland and Kimball. Please place on the Council's next agenda to consider entering into the attached contract with Tarrant County and authorizing staff to use 6" base material as subgrade in lieu of lime or cement stabilization if the soils' report recommends same. If you have any questions, please contact me. r1 J MHB/lc attachment n L r] C TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M February 1, 1991 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager e p cc,, i Llb( Cl Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director TRUCK BIDS Attached is the bid tabulation and specifications for three (3) 3/4-ton pickup and two (2) extended cab pickup trucks. The bids were opened and read aloud on Thursday, January 1, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. Ten vendors in the area were sent bid specifications and eight (8) bids were returned. All of the major car companies were represented in the bidding procedure. The low bidder meeting specifications was North Loop Dodge in Fort Worth for both size vehicles. The budgeted amount for all five vehicles was $65,000 ($13,000 each). The distribution of the trucks will be as follows: Truck Extended Cab Extended Cab 3/4-ton Pickup 3/4-ton Pickup 3/4-ton Pickup n;viai^n Replace/New Water (Meter Reader) Replacement Street (Constr. Inspector) New Street (Superintendent) Replacement Water (Utility) Replacement Sewer (Utility) New The bid tabulation outlines the delivery time and the warranty periods for both types of vehicles. North Loop Dodge has the lowest delivery time and meets or exceeds the warranty period of the other bidders. Staff compared bids for the same type of vehicles from the State Purchasing Agency and Houston -Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC). A comparison of the bids between HGAC, the State and North Loop Dodge are as follows: Vehicle TvDe Extended Cab 3/4-ton Pickup * Did not bid. ** This bid was 4-cylinder. HGAC Iq $13,908.86 State Purchasing **$10,438.74 $11,887.00 North Loop Dodge $ 10,097.00 $ 12,097.00 for a 6-cylinder vehicle and Staff specified a 3 -/ li Lil Fi L� City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk February 1, 1991 Page 2 As can be seen, the State's bid on the 3/4-ton pickups is lower than North Loop Dodge by $210.00 per vehicle. If the City purchases the 3/4-ton vehicles from the State, the vehicles would have to be purchased from a dealer in Austin, Texas. Also, the State's bid allows a 90-day delivery time compared to North Loop Dodge's delivery time of 45 days. It is the Staff's recommendation that the vehicles be purchased from North Loop Dodge for the following reasons: 1. It is always to the City's advantage to purchase vehicles locally so that better attention is given to repairs during the warranty period. 2. The difference in cost between the State's bid and North Loop Dodge for the three 3/4-ton vehicles is $630.00 and it is the Staff's opinion that a local vendor would offset this cost over the years. 3. If the City purchased the 3/4-ton vehicles from the State and the extended cab from North Loop Dodge, the City would be buying from two different vendors. It is to the City's advantage to purchase from one vendor where it is feasible. 4. The total cost of all five vehicles from North Loop Dodge Iis $56,485 versus the State's bid of $56,538.48. Based on the above, it is the Staff's recommendation that the Council award the bids for two (2) extended cab pickups to North Loop Dodge for $10,097 each for a total bid of $20,194 and for three (3) 3/4-ton pickups to North Loop Dodge for $12,097 each for a total bid of $36,291.00. The total bid package for the five (5) vehicles is $56,485.00. North Loop Dodge has an extended warranty coverage for $500 per vehicle. Staff is reluctant to recommend that the City purchase the coverage because of the warranties given. However, if the Council decides to purchase the extended warranty coverage, Staff would do so. Please place this item on the next Council agenda for consideration. M�J MHB/lc attachment. Bid tabulation L f� o?3 - ... � E E E E E E E C •o . CD •o •o •o -o •o go 00 00 00 00 00p 00 00 $a Eo EO Eo Eo Eoaa Eo Eo N W.O eo %ooCE NNm Loom %oom NN %oOm ko%om 3 C7004 kw .4r4m MOM MOM P4WI enLnm CV) enm $4 -► Ln in o O Ln o 0 m m m qw r (r M r CA e+) >E>+ I 1 �EE-eQ Q �43 o 0 0 0 o r`oi o a as to o OD U U EU�0 e o% 9-4 a a O N N M N eh qw eh aE N N N N N N a O eo U Q CD CD Q Go V O O O O O r-1 O N CD W •• Q O 10 !- O eT M O tb 01 O z U W at Ln ao %o cr qw es► 4.- w cn to co Ln E+ 'C $4CDo CD C4 1-4 a w a z >1 eV tV fV N C4 N N E4 at x at E E E E E E >1 L�ze") K 00 00 00 00 00 00 o to Eo Eo Eo so EO EO $N VCDEa Go0E4 %00m room w0E4 %oOm 3 CDr-04 qrLna MOM MOM VON c)Lnm 1 to 01*3 - to o Cl 0 0 o N w U z m 0 43 0% o ch ate► %o Lo i N en co er �+ co N a Ee O O Ek Cl EU a M M 'im m U N O O O O O In E a 4'1 Co 0 00 0 Q z 0 eo UW 0 m m EO-e 0 m o i 1 v $4 % . % O � ms rq P4 W4 � ri z V eh >+ eh cr f eh M eh eh eh a V 0% a •-+ ti C m > m zC C m 3N� A0 �'C! � AU V41 wV >rN $4 010 E+1 0 0 rl41 r-1 C C C 00 Go m goo ow -q0 mm zca allow ti in rAE4 ma aA •-a N > A er 9; %o n > > > > > > E E •O .O 00 00 go EcO ko ko O O E4 CV) en%o%ow &n qr O en e•'1 N CL 0 I v +1 m O z eh Co m x N 41 w O m O EA K Q $N 4 O do 0%4 w Ew-4 $4 0 0 o. m a°OaoaE1 a a Hmm wm0 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 29, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ann Barnes, Park Board Member SUBJECT: SOFT DRINK VENDORS AND ELECTRIC SCOREBOARDS FOR THREE BALL FIELDS ----------- - ---------------------------------------- The Southlake Parks & Recreation Board heard a presentation by Mike Thompson, Southlake Baseball Association, on soft drink vendors for the concession stand at Bicentennial Park. The contract proposals were from Coke, Pepsi, and Dr. Pepper. The proposals all offered electric scoreboards for the three ball fields in conjunction with their soft drink concessions. The Park Board voted to recommend the City Council authorize a contractual agreement with Dr. Pepper Corporation for the required five years. Advertising space is available for sale at the bottom of each of these scoreboards. Southlake Baseball and Park Board will work in conjunction to sell these spaces with funds to go into the Park Board's fund for improvements to Bicentennial Park. We request this item be placed on the next available Council meeting so the Council may authorize the mayor to enter into a contract with Dr. Pepper for providing soft drinks and electric scoreboards for the contracted period of five years. Ann Barnes Parks Board AB/lc - � ate- Specifications Model BA 100 Cabinet size: 8ft. Wide by 4 ft. Tall All aluminum construction. Riveted and reinforced at corners and points of stress. Finish: One coat of acid etch vinyl primer. Two coats of epoxy enamel with plactisizer added. Available in black with white trim only. Furnished with four steel hanger brackets located at Oft. on center. Numerals: Recessed IS inch with protective screens including the Ball, Strike and out area. Lamps are 130 volt 30 watt, extended _life flood lamps. Electronics: All solid state. Enclosed in a single removable, plug in pack- age. Control: Low voltage control has push button switches 'to advance Score Innings and Ball, Strike and Out circuits. No power is needed at the control. Remote control cable: Multi conductor IS guage, 300 volt insulated. Warranty: One year warranty on parts and workmanship. Lamps excluded. Replacement parts in stock for exchange or repair. c r 1 C;Z92-3 imi Dr Pe �' pper Bottling Company of Texas P.O. BOX 6=24 • DAL(AS. TUAS 7SM , (214) $79.1024 January 11, 1391 Southlake Baseball Assoc. C/O Mike Thompson Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas is pleased to offer the following proposal to Southlake Baseball Association. Dr Pepper will provide Southlake Baseball �. Association with three (3) electronic baseball scoreboards for Bicentennial Park. In consideration, Southlake Baseball Association grants Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Texas the following exclusive rights at Bicentennial Park and all other activities controlled by Southlake Baseball Association for (6) years: C� CONTRACT: April 1, 1991 through March 31, 1996 A. Exclusive Dr Pepper identified equipment. B. Exclusive supplier of all soft drinks for concessions. C. Exclusive point of sale materials advertising Dr Pepper products at or near all concessions. D. first right of refusal for additional scoreboards with Southlake baseball Association. It is further understood that the above mentioned scoreboards are the property of Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas and will remain so for the life of the scoreboard. Southlake Baseball Association will be responsible for providi.ng Installation of scoreboards and providing electrical needs to the boards for operation. Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas Southlake Baseball Association r a�-s TOTAL P.02 AGENDA FOR SPEAKERS 1. Keith Letsinger General Concerns with zoning/presentation of petition 2. Janie Mabry Traffic concern with park and heavy usage of park 3. Kathy Letsinger Traffic concerns in neighborhood Plans to widen Whiteschapel 4. Tamara McMillan Quality of Life 5. Bob Dowdy Vail the City 6. Randall Boyd Due Diligence 7. Lee Schiavolin Stall Development/Cart before the horse 8. Jay Mabry Grocery Store Petitions 1 1 1 1 ......... .. ........... ...i�'ort...... ...... lit ........ ........ APPLICATION SUMMARY ...................... - ............ ...... 1) Recipient City of Grapevine Police Department 2) Type of Application Submitted E] Youth Prevention/Intervention [:] Adult Prevention/Intervention Youth Treatment E] Adult Treatment 3) Name of Proposed Program 4) When Proposed Program Was/Will be Established Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. Program Address 307 W. Dallas Road October 1991 Month Year City zip Grapevine, TX 76051 5) Program Contact Person 6) Staffing # # Wayne Eichel Full -Time Part -Tim Title Corporal Telephone Administrative 1 (817)481-0324 Program Director 1 Address Clinical Director — 307 W. Dallas Road Counselor City Zip Caseworker Grapevine, TX 76051 Specialist 3 ]S�A R.E In tructor 8) Annual Organization Budget Contractual: Proposed Program $ 335,220.81 Other Programs TOTAL $ 335,220-81 7) TCADA Amount Requested $197,225.24 9) Target Population Race/Ethnicity Percent Age Range American Indian 1% Male Female Black 2% Hispanic 4% 6-17 6-17 White 92% Other 1% Description: The target population is the student body of two school districts, the Grapevine Colleyville I.S.D. and the Southlake Carroll I.S.D. These students number .approximately 11,000 and represent the Future of the Nation. As such, this group is in critical need of Drug Awareness Education as they are our best chance to reduce the demand for illicit drugs. As a secondary target population, all citizens within the communities of Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville will be provided with Drug Awareness Information to help foster community support for the effort&.of the target group to remain drug free. 1nstructions on Back Attachment I Page 17 of 76 City of �- Southlake-�� 372 o= the Cleveland realized their woods, but seedlings; and, ftereas* the first "ARBOR DAY" was celebrated in the State of Kansas, when J. Sterling Morton, a member State Board of Agriculture, under President Grover that the people of his state should not only protect should add to them regularly by planting young trees and WHEREAS, when Theodore Roosevelt was president, he made the conservation of the United States natural resources one of his principal aims; and, WHEREAS, in the City of Southlake, Texas, the Mayor and City Council members have also taken steps to protect our natural resources by encouraging the preservation of trees; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, City Staff and, citizens of Southlake hereby join in with the students of the Carroll Middle School Science Club in celebration of "ARBOR DAY" in the City of Southlake by planting a tree; now, I, MAYOR GARY FICKES, do hereby proclaim January 24, 1991 as -------- "ARBOR DAY" :in the Cit f Sou Texas. of �: Jyo , Cit 4 Southlake 11 IN 10) Summary of Program Narrative The cities of Grapevine, Colleyville, and Southlake border upon each other in the Northeastern section of Tarrant County. The three communities send children to school in two separate school districts, the Grapevine Colleyville I.S.D. and the Southlake Carroll I.S.D. Both school districts and all three communities are charged wit the responsibility of combating drug usage among our students and citizens. The most effective method of reducing the effects of drugs on the structure of our society is to educate the populace about the effects and consequences of drug abuse and thereby reduce the demand for illicit drugs. To this end all the involved cities and educational groups have entered into project D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and are presented this program to it's school populations. However the close proximity of the boundaries and the fact that school districts boundaries are different from the city lines. It has become obvious that greater coordination between the D.A.R.E. projects is necessary. This Grant will fund the formation of Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. A multi -agency task force aimed at coordinating anti -drug education and focusing community attention on the Drug Abuse Resistance techniques as well coordinate the Drug Free Schools Enforcement initiative. This task force will provide adequate personnel to instruct D.A.R.E. classes throughout all grade levels and to coordinate parental and community involvement in the Drug Abuse Education process. The cities will provide personnel with the initial D.A.R.E. training to the program. These offices will have tri use of a vehicle supplied by each city. Much of the office equipment and supplies for the program will be provided by the participating agencies. The requested Grant monies will fund mainly instruction equipment, operational costs and personnel and related expenses. The success of this program will be measured by the community response to re- program and through the use of questionnaires, testing the students attitudes toward drug usage. These questionnaires will be administered prior to the students exposure to the program and then after culmination. Community attitudes will be measured through school district opinion polls. 7/7V JUQIU W6LLU[1J UIl DdGX Attachment 1 Page 19 of 76 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 1. TYPE OF ❑ NOTICE OF INTENT (OPTIONAL) SUBMISSION ❑ (Mark ap. PREAPPLICATION prapnore ® APPLICATION bmt) 2. APPLI- CANTS APPLI- CATION IDENTI- FIER a. NUMBER 3. STATE a. NUMBER APPLI. CATION IDENTI- b. DATE FIER b. DATE Yea► month day NO2E TO BE ASSIGNED SSIGNED 1990 12 31 BY STATE ;M6 ACWCvi1 4C :.fa9-it Year nwalk day 19 Laarr 8/aak 4. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT 5. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) • a• APOCS t Nun• Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E. 75-6000-546 b. Orr9aruawn and Grapevine Police Department 6 c Sv«vP.o. Bo: 307 W. Dallas Road PRO- a. NUMBER ( I I I I d• C-ly Grapevine •. County Tarrant GRAM I. State Texas a ZIP Code. 76051 (Fran CFDA) MULTIPLE ❑ h• Cwftd Person (No- Wayne Eichel, Corporal b• TITLE a Teleplume /Vn) (817) 481-0324 7. TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT Mw aeeeon IV of In form b pvviW a aumnlary dampoon of vw 6. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT Northeast Tarrant County D.A.R.E., to provide �`"',,,� °H-1� � s coordinated D.A.R.E. instruction and facilitate community W support for the reduction of drug abuse through education 1-04 aw�eyyt within the boundaries of two school districts and three `-i7C1° Erne. appropriote /ewer ❑ communities. 9. AREA OF PROTECT IMPACT (Neuwa of cities aruwdes aareQ e4e1 10. ESTIMATED NUMBER 11. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE I OF PERSONS BENEFITING A-4w- o'er" o-'ML^^v a-3sO�+r Oirr E-0rr c-iaer, E+a+avrq A! r� i.ea.w 12. PROPOSED FUNDING 13. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 14. TYPE OF APPLICATION (fCAA�eelu ES '' E ' a. APPLICANT s 00 Senate #10 b. PROTECT Senate #10 �� E-AI�rin km► AI s Aaar k'APJ 1 1 1 An AAA 00 House 489 492 Hou 489 492 17 se , 197 , 225 ,00 15. PROJECT START I& PROJECT DATE jaw, ,wank dov DURATION LOCAL .00 r' I 19 90 10 01 e. OTHER .00 •,a natr rr IC TA 12Aftff, Year month day • TYPE 0P ClU165E (Far /de or /4) 0e4" a -pew a-a.e.... coftm 0Dm� Ommn a-40 s4al If. Total Is 335, 220 .001 FEDERAL AGENCY . 19 19. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse a. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT (IF APPROPRIATE) Ib. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT (IF KNOWN) c ADDRESS 720 Brazos St. Suite 403, Austin, Texas 78701 22, TO if» best of my knowledge and ba" . a. YES. THIS NOTICE OF INTENT/PREAPPLICAT /APPLCATION WAS M/ THE data in Vu preappkabon/appbcabon EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCE FOR REVIEW ON: .AP PLICANT WO bur and correct V* doaxn•nas t hDATE December 31. 1990 ,A CERTIFIES Oe•n duly &Ahonz d by to gomnn0 a THAT► body of dw appieant and the appf+cant will canDb ""h the attached aaK9WXe• b. NO. PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372 ❑ d the asa stance is approved. OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW ❑ 23. I a. TYPED NAME AND nTLE CERTIF1fING REPRI SENT) 24. APPUCA- Year mawtk day 125. FEDERAL 100 TION RECEIVED 19 27. ACTION TAKEN O a. AWARDED O b. REJECTED F O c. RETURNED FOR ! AMENDMENT O d RETURNED FOR ED. 12372 SUBMISSION BY APPLICANT TO STATE e. DEFERRED �f. WITHDRAWN 21L FUf a. FESERriL t b. APPLICANT c STA FEMAL d. LOCAL e. OTHER f. TOTAL IS b. SIGNATURE Eno► +solo• Pula retage/ 20. EXISTING FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 21. REMARKS ADDED IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 126. FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION Yaw manth day 29. ACTION DATE► 19 .00 31. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA. AO T1ON (Name and te4DAme number) •00 Funding Processes Section •0 (512) 867-8700 .00 .00 STATE ARTING Yew monul dote ITE 19 32. ENDING Yew DATE 19 REMARKS ADDED ❑ Ya ❑ No NSN 7540-01-00"162 Fj1FVIOUS EDITION IrT USABLE 424-103 STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 1 (Rev. 4-4A) Pkwnbed by OMB Circular A-102 Attachment 1 Page 21 of 76 C O O O O Co O O m O %D C CLC) O 1 1 1 C� 1� CD C) LC C)C)LO fi.. IliCDy� I1I N 11) N O x. p Ol O �' ., >3.A:'^: a"?; W t� r•1 C)C)C)CD.;c LC C) 1. A•, b O mr Cr O 1 Lr I 1 1 O O C r� Q u ,�,3 •rl Y W u c H O O O O CDC) cc C)^' .. ae (a.2 1 1 Q 1 1 1 a00 IL) C! In O� ��:5 �i F x � ✓ � v: �v "FfTu l F� Cc :� ..��5/„„ Za, `' 5` nt "' .. ^ t Qi u j' IL +ri O O . •: y c ' u C 'c 1� •--1C C O O LO O O Q m a3 a }2 I V ":r LC o O Cpu .--I w:. o:f9F: t4� Q Pn�s az :3: r.Mt?::: :.IYN%: i ��zz ...,» i�'E Q O a x1R:E.,:: . O CO Q Crkc 1 a LC r,Q I I O O 1 O 1 Q CD ko t 1 l0 1 1 1 $ O � N %D CIIj Cn rl 6 i! s E- At E N � m N q E s d• Zp JI �. ',I•""��Y•i:•, N U c m E y ii CtsI Q J76 E . O �•'• '-I E r E C)d W H W ✓i C) U o U O ►'_ cCD _ H 11 �. M t'•1 '! alti' �,.,.r t0 V C E o0 xi Y w n a N C, N 1 — Attachment 1 Page 26 of 76 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth The program proposed in this R.F.P. shall be called the Northeast Tarrant County DALPLE. Program. (N.E.T.C.O. D.A.R.E.) BACKGROUND AND NEED In 1983 the City of Grapevine, Grapevine Police Department, and the Grapevine Col- leyville Independent School District (G.C.I.S.D.) recognized that the number of juveniles engaging in delinquent and/or criminal activities was steadily increasing. In an effort to combat this trend the agencies entered into an agreement that saw the for- mation of a School Resource Officer (S.R.O.). This project was staffed by a single officer whose responsibility was to act as a liaison between the school populations and the criminal justice system. This officer was suc- cessful in that incidents where law enforcement and school authorities overlapped were more effectively handled. The Police Department received positive input from the school population and the school populations were less leary of law enforcement. Criminal activities of all types were cleared in a more efficient manner resulting in a less volatile atmosphere on the campuses of the G.C.I.S.D. During the summer of 1987 the district and city became concerned with national studies LW which showed the age at which drug experimentation occurred dropping and began to explore methods for the S.R.O. to reach the younger students. In an effort to combat this problem a D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program was stated. This program, as developed by the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Unified School District, was designed to instruct students on life skills such as building self esteem, recognizing risk, assertive response skills, and other skills necessary to com- bat the temptation and peer pressures associated with drug experimentation. The initial pilot program was a success from an instructional point of view. Educators and parents remarked that the students involved in the program were demonstrating improved abilities to recognize the targeted risk factors and a more defined concept of self responsibility and control. The program, however was not without it's problems, most of which stemmed from the part time approach used in finding personnel for the instruction. The S.R.O. would frequently be called away from class for pressing mat- ters, such as a reported child abuse, missing elementary student, or disturbances on other campuses. While some interruption to the class schedule was anticipated the detrimental affect on students moral was higher than anticipated. Another, more unexpected, situation also arose, the City of Grapevine is served by two school districts: The G.C.I.S.D. and Carroll/Southlake I.S.D. (C.S.I.S.D.). During this first year C.S.I.S.D. did not offer a D.A.R.E. Program. This meant that a large segment of the Grapevine population was not receiving the D.A.R.E. curriculum. Originally it was thought that the two student Moe groups remained isolated from each other, however, judging from the complaints Program Narrative 1 J� H City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth recieved from the parents of students not receiving D.A.R.E., the intermingling and in- formational exchange between the two student bodies was greater than originally an- ticipated. With the onset of the 1988-1989 school year agencies from both Grapevine and South - lake sought to remedy these problems. In Grapevine an additional officer was trained as a D.A.R.E. Instructor and assigned on a part-time basis to back up the S.R.O. program and project D.A.R.E. The City of Southlake and the C.S.I.S.D. entered into an agreement that provided for a S.R.O./D.A.R.E. Officer. The amount of students ex- posed to the D.A.R.E. curriculum nearly doubled. Again the parental, student, and community response to both projects was overwhelming. D.A.R.E. was now being received by students residing predominantly in two districts and three cities: Grapevine, Colleyville, and Southlake. After reviewing the programs in both districts the agencies found encouraging news in the reception of the D.A.R.E. programs and discouraging news in the program logistics. Both programs were finding it difficult to maintain regular instruction schedules due to the part-time nature of the officers assigned as classroom instructors. There was no logical way to reassign the 'other assigned duties" of the D.A.R.E. officers because of existing staffing problems within the participating Police Agencies. This uncertainty in scheduling was proving to be disruptive in the classroom both to the students and to the classroom teacher. The D.A.R.E. program in its entirety is designed around the core course taught at the 5th and 6th grade level. However, the program functions best when administered throughout the children's school experience. This concept consist of "visitations" with the lower grades, each lasting about 5 sessions and follow-ups with the higher grades. Using the offices assigned to D.A.R.E. on a part-time basis the Grapevine Police Department and Southlake Police Department Officers were getting core curriculum taught but that was about it. The other major problem noted was in the area of coordinating community support. The area served by the two D.A.R.E. Programs is unique in that it is relatively compact and it's business and civic organization often share memberships. Therefore the two D.A.R.E. Programs often found themselves competing with each other for the support of these groups. The end result being both groups were supported but neither one fully. Coordinating events to help reinforce the classroom lessons got to be a major problem. Groups were either confused as to which program was benefiting the majority of its members. As the D.A.R.E. programs were identifying problems resulting from the lack of man- power to provide quality instruction to students and an inability to coordinate activities Program Narrative 2 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth within the adult population served continued. The two school districts posted nearly 10% annual growth rates. In essence what the agencies were faced with boiled down to this. A very effective program that addressed the issue of Drug Abuse from the demand side by instructing children on the workings of peer pressure and self esteem, helping them develop the life skills necessary to learn that success and happiness are available but do not come packaged in a bottle, plastic baggy, or syringe. A program that was very well received by all aspects. of the community was gradually being robbed of its effectiveness because of manpower shortages, jurisdictional boundary problems and lack of coordination. The answer became obvious, a combined effort involving the personnel of all agencies responsible to the target populations providing for a concentrated effort to reduce drug abuse through education. From this concept came the request for funding before you now. The Northeast Tar- rant County D.A.R.E. Project. The concept is relatively simple. 'Together We Stand, Divided We Fall." GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals of N. E. T. CO. D.A.R.E. will be as follows: • Provide consistent D.A.R.E. instruction to students attending the Grapevine Colleyville ISD and the Carroll Southlake ISD • Coordinate effective community involvement in the D.A.R.E. Program • Increase parental involvement in D.A.R.E. activities • Design and instruct summer activities to continue and reinforce the D.A.R.E. education process PROGRAM DESIGN AND APPROACH The target population for this program is the general population of the participating school districts with a secondary target population identified as the parents of those students. Particular attention will be paid to those students who are identified as the high risk age group of 15-16 years of age. These students have been identified as most likely to be approached for first time usage of drugs and alcohol. Students within this age group will receive the 17 and 10 week care curriculum programs. The D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program was chosen as the method of providing information to the student body because it provided the most effective method to deal wit the problem as recognized by the respective school districts. The Program Narrative 3 j City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth GCISD recently participated in the Parents Resource Institute for Drug Education Sur- vey. This survey indicated a very low percentage of students involved in drug usage and ;a medium involvement in tobacco and alcohol use. The common denominator in all usages was the location of participation, 539 of the students who used beer, for example, used at a friends house or with friends at a park or other location. A majority of these students replied that they would have preferred to say no but couldn't figure out how to. These are exactly the life skills dealt with in the D.A-R.E. curriculum thus it was felt that our target group would benefit most from D.A.R.E. as apposed to more intensive intervention type programs. D.A.R.E. is an instruction program dealing with life skills concepts, primarily in the areas of peer pressure resistance, self-esteem improvement, risk assessment, support group instruction and value decision such as respect for the rights of others, and per- sonal safety. D.A.R.E. strategies use techniques based in role playing, interpersonal communication skills and recognizing alternatives to drug usage within the confines of this program. D.A.R.E. instructions will be provided in these structure types. • The 17 week core curriculum - designed to be presented to the fifth and sixth grade age level. • The 10 week curriculum - aimed at the seventh and eighth grade student. • Visitations - Five week curriculum is tailored for the K-4 age groups. In order to meet the goals stated earlier N. E. T. CO. D.A.R.E. will be structured as a multi -agency task force designed to provide drug and alcohol abuse education centered on the D.A.R.E. curriculum and concepts. N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will combine the drug education efforts of six agencies as they pertain to the students housed within the schools; Grapevine Colleyville ISD and the Southlake Carroll ISD. In order to facilitate open communications and share the decision making process equally among agencies representing the effected population base, N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. activities will be overseen by a Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will consist will consist of the Chief of Police, or his designee from each of the cities engaged in this program, Colleyville, Grapevine and Southlake. The school districts involved will be represented by three at risk coordinators. The Board of Directors will be responsible for establishing policy and objectives for the program and will be responsible for reporting on the program to the various elected boards and councils. The Board of Directors may increase its membership upon majority vote. Program Narrative 4 IJ Ll C City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth The policy and objectives established by the Board of Directors will be administered by the program coordinators through the classroom and field activities of the D.A.R.E. Instructors and a currently funded school resource officer. The student population of the participating school districts is approximately 10,637 stu- dents. These students are distributed among 14 campuses. Although the grade levels housed in each school differs slightly between the two districts the D.A.R.E. courses would be instructed in eight elementary schools, three middle schools, one junior high and 2 high schools. Along with this public school participation there are approximately 10 private school and day care facilities currently using the McGruff Program along with visitations from police officers to help their students learn drug and personal safety concepts. We are proposing that the 17 week core curriculum be instructed in approximately 32 classes, the 10 week programs presented to an additional 25 classes and that five seek visitations be made to another 171 classes. This translates to over 1,158 hours of class- room instruction. *The attendance figures are based on Fall 1990 enrollment. Growth rate for each district has been 10% annually for the last two years. In addition to the classroom instruction the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program has estab- lished as a goal increased parental involvement. In order to accomplish this we plan to build on the positive "word of mouth" parents are receiving from their children. D.A.R.E. instructors are constantly confronted by parents who say "I've heard so much about you." We intend to have the parents hear not only about D.A.R.E. but become aware of the concepts instructed. Our approach to this will be four fold. First we will send out periodic letters to the parents informing them of the progress of the D.A.R.E. curriculum. This we let parents in on the process by letting them know exactly where their child is with regards to the lesson being taught. These letters will be sent home with suggestions for projects that parents and children could work on together, projects that help reinforce the concepts being discussed in D.A.R.E. Ap- proach number two is a D.A.R.E. newsletter, while written primarily for the students we believe the newsletter will be shared by the students and parents. The parents there- fore would be informed about current D.A.R.E. events and share the information and inspiration found in the newsletter. The newsletter will also provide parents with an insight on how well the lessons are working. They will be able to judge this for them- selves by reading the work of the students which are published in the newsletter. Our third technique for reading, parents will be the presentation of periodic parent forums. These forums will be conducted by D.A.R.E. instructors with the assistance of ' school district employees and local drug abuse counselors. These forums would fea- Program Narrative 5 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth ture discussions on parenting, pressures faced by todays teens, local drug cultures, and group behaviors as witnessed by police and school authorities. These forums would also be designed to allow the parents time to gather answers to questions that arise during the rearing of children. It is important to note that the forums are designed as an educational tool not a promotional gimmick. It is our intent to provide a place for parents to get honest answers about drug and alcohol usage and how to help keep their kids from falling victim to the temptations of drugs. Finally we will attempt to publicize all aspects of the D.A.R.E. program through a 10 minute TV segment called D.A.R.E. corner. The cable outlet serving the targeted com- munity has made available time for local crime prevention programming. This program appears bi-weekly. The D.A.R.E. corner will appear within the context of this crime prevention program. Lastly we need to address our final goal, community coordination. Presently the D.A.R.E. program enjoys wide spread support throughout our community. Unfor- tunately D.A.R.E. has no structure to organize that support. Our school district lines cross city borders and service clubs serve both communities. Therefore the organiza- tion of drug education under one umbrella for all communities clarifies the boundary problems. When these boundary problems are overcome all parties involved can set down to the serious work of organizing the existing community projects into a united chorus against drug abuse. On the intervention and treatment front our communities have organized the community chemical awareness council to provide coordinated assessment and treatment. We envision the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. program as this same type of catalyst group for child drug prevention education. Our group will network with civic organizations and governmental agencies though the association and relationships generated by our Board of Directors and the staff of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will activity seek our community groups who wish to help and match them to a need. A major community orientated project will be summer D.A.R.E. camp activities. Com- munity based activities for students to provide alternatives to drugs and reinforce the D.A.R.E. ideals. AIDS ISSUES D.A.R.E. will taught as an instruction unit within two school districts. Aids related topics will be addressed by district personnel in different instructional units. i Program Narrative 6 A City or Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Evaluation Plan Evaluation of the effectiveness of the program will be made by using entrance and exit polls. The D.A.R.E. students will be given a standardized list of questions designed to test attitudes toward drug abuse at the beginning of the D.A.R.E. instruction period and then the questions will be presented again at the end of the course. The results can then be compared to see if we have affected attitudes. Students will also be required to compose a "stand" or essay upon completion of the D.A.R.E. core curriculums. These "stands" will be used to measure the students grasp of the information presented to them. Parents will be polled annually with several questions about their perception of the D.A.R.E. curriculum and the attitude of their children toward drug abuse. This poll- ing will take place during an annual public survey conducted by the participating school districts. The Grapevine Colleyville ISD also participates in the P.R.I.D.E. (Parents Resource Institute for Drug Education Survey and the results of this survey will be studied in order to detect trends either upward or downward in drug and alcohol usage within the student body. This information will then be used to target groups for more intensive D.A.R.E. instruction and to measure the effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. instruction on reducing those usages. STAFFING N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. will be staffed with five police officers, of the five officers four are funded by the grant and one is a continuing program placed within the grant or- ganization. The School Resource Officer program has been mentioned earlier in this proposal. For purposes of providing coordination between enforcement on campus and drug abuse education the School Resource Officer will be placed under the umbrella of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. program. He will also serve as a back-up to the D.A.R.E. instruc- tor in case of illness or injury. The four officers funded by the grant will all be D.A.R.E. instructors. One of these officers will be selected to serve as the program coordinator by the Board of Directors. Instructional responsibility will be divided among the four D.A.R.E. instructors based upon two guidelines. First we will strive to remain consistent wit the concept of feeder schools currently in place within our educational system. For the purposes of D.A.R.E. instruction the students that are receiving the 17 week core curriculum will be the top ' of the pyramid. Students in grades below this group shall be the feeder students. Program Narrative 7 IJ City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Using this concept there are three geographic feeder systems within a target area each with a middle school and approximately two elementary schools feeding it. Therefore we intend to assign one D.A.R.E. officer to each middle school and it's feeder schools functioning as primary D.A.R.E. officer for that group. The fourth 1 D.A.R.E. officer would be assigned to the Grapevine Jr. High School to serve as primary D.A.R.E. instructor for the seventh and eighth curriculum and to as- sist any of the other D.A.R.E. instructors should the growth in any region outstrip the primary officers ability to cover the class time. The second criteria used for distribution of D.A.R.E. instructors will be the U. S. Department of Justice B.J.D. D.A.R.E. Implementation Manual recommendation that a D.A.R.E. officer teach no more than four 55 minute classes per day. The recommen- dation speaks directly to an officers ability to effectively interact and communicate with students. Our feeder school assignment sistem produces a workload picture for each officer would look like this: 14 classes X 17 week course = 238 instruction hours LW1 24 visitations X 5 week course = 120 instruction hours 358 instruction hours 358 / 140 Instructional Day = 3 hours per day Each school year consists of approximately 170 days. Forpurpose of this equation, 30 days were subtracted to account for testing schedules and other occurrences that make outside instruction impractical or an interfernce with the clasroom teachers lesson plans. . The officer assigned to the Junior High would teach the following course schedule: 25 classes X 10 week course = 250 hours 4 special ed classes X 5 weeks = 20 hours 270 hours 270 / 140 = 2 hours per day This officer would also be assigned to the private and day schools visitations in the area and will be responsible for the coordination of the adult education aspects of the -low N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program. Program Narrative 8 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth ORGANIZATION QUALIFICATIONS The N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program will be a new organization formed under the direc- tion and with the complete support of several long standing governmental bodies. The cities of Grapevine, Southlake, and Colleyville have all consented to allow their respec- tive police departments to participate in the project. Both the Southlake/Carroll ISD and Grapevine Colleyville ISD have granted permission for the project to operate within their schools and have pledged financial and tutorial support. The make-up of the Board of Directors for the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. project firmly links this project to the responsible governmental bodies. The cities involved in this project have provided training for the officers involved in the program. In addition to bearing the cost of training the cities are supplying equipment for the use of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. staff as have the school districts. Our budgetary documents show that lion's share of the grant request will fund personnel salaries and related expenses, instructional material and operating costs. The facilities and capital equipment are for the most part being supplied to the program by the participating agencies. In addition to equipment and office space the City of Grapevine and Grapevine Col- leyville ISD are funding the School Resource Officer section of the program in it's en- tirety. This officer will be at the disposal of the N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. Program but will be funded entirely from city and school district funds. This represents a cash invest- ment of approximately $50,000. IMPLEMENTATION The personnel who will be assigned to N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. are for the most part on the payrolls of the various agencies. The procurement of any equipment not already owned by the participating agencies will be made via the participating agencies pur- chasing policies and therefore will comply with state procurement laws. Any delays in procurement of equipment will not effect the delivery of the lessons to the target populations. The agencies involved are committed to providing N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. with all start up assistance necessary and view this project as the future of drug abuse education in this area. Program Narrative 9 1 City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.RE. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Police linstructor - (D.A.R.E. Certified Police Officer) Qualifications: 1. Must be a licensed Texas peace officer. 2. Be able to communicate on all levels from kindergarten to school faculty. 4. Prior to entering the classroom, each officer must complete an 80-hour D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) certification training course. The curriculum will include teaching techniques, as well as elementary school operations, prepara- tion of visual aids, officer -school relationships, development of self-esteem, peer pressure resistance techniques, narcotics recognition, communication skills, child development, and classroom evaluations. 5. Outstanding moral character with stable home life. 6. Be a positive role model. Duties and Responsibilities: Being a D.A.R.E. instructor is a demanding job. While it may spare officers the bur- den of shift changes and weekend duty, they must agree, in the bargain to work very hard. The full extent of D.A.R.E. officers' duties and responsibilities can be seen in this list, culled from job descriptions for D.A.R.E. instructors teaching at the elemen- tary level: • teach D.A.R.E. core curriculum, spend time with students during recess and in the cafeteria, and participate in school activities such as assemblies and faculty meetings, etc. • prepare teaching materials (e.g., lesson plans, student notebooks and hand- outs, visual aids) and guides for teachers' auxiliary classroom activities. • teach kindergarten through 4th grade curriculum • prepare for and give presentations at faculty inservice meetings, parent meet- ings, and public speaking engagements • schedule and coordinate culmination (D.A.R.E. student graduation) exer- cises and complete D.A.R.E. diplomas. • teach the middle school curriculum • participate in extracurricular activities such as Halloween festivities, holiday programs, and field trips • present abbreviated programs to nonparticipating schools • attend inservice training sessions U City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D. A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth Project Coordinator - (D.A.R.E. Certified Police Officer) Qualifications: 1.• Must be a licensed Texas peace officer. 2. Be able to communicate on all levels from kindergarten to school faculty. 3. Must be eligible to qualify as D.A.R.E. officers mentor. 4. Prior to entering the classroom, each officer must complete an 80-hour D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) certification training course. The curriculum will include teaching techniques, as well as elementary school operations, prepara- tion of visual aids, officer -school relationships, development of self-esteem, peer pressure resistance techniques, narcotics recognition, communication skills, child development, and classroom evaluations. 5. Outstanding moral character with stable home life. 6. Be a positive role model. 7. Be capable of supervising N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E. staff and operations budget. Duties and Responsibilities: Being a D.A.R.E. instructor is a demanding job. While it may spare officers the bur- den of shift changes and weekend duty, they must agree, in the bargain to work very hard. The full extent of D.A.R.E. officers' duties and responsibilities can be seen in this list, culled from job descriptions for D.A.R.E. instructors teaching at the elemen- tary level: • teach D.A.R.E. core curriculum, spend time with students during recess and in the cafeteria, and participate in school activities such as assemblies and faculty meetings, etc. • prepare teaching materials (e.g., lesson plans, student notebooks and hand- outs, visual aids) and guides for teachers' auxiliary classroom activities. • teach kindergarten through 4th grade curriculum • prepare for and give presentations at faculty inservice meetings, parent meet- ings, and public speaking engagements • schedule and coordinate culmination (D.A.R.E. student graduation) exer- cises and complete D.A.R.E. diplomas. • teach the middle school curriculum • participate in extracurricular activities such as Halloween festivities, holiday programs, and field trips C i 11 Ij City of Grapevine, Police Department N.E.T.C.O . D.A.R.E. Grapevine, Colleyville, Southlake Prevention - General Public - Youth • present abbreviated programs to nonparticipating schools • keep records of daily and monthly activities • attend inservice training sessions j fl GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS Dr. E.A. Siglar Jr. Superintendent of Schools Grapevine/Colleyville ISD Dr. Annette Griffen Superintendent of Schools Carroll ISD Chief Tom Caperton Chief of Police Grapevine Police Department Director James "Billy" Campbell Director of Public Safety Southlake DPS Chief Don Steele Chief of Police Colleyville Police Department L C C ORGANIZATION CHART N.E.T.CO. D.A.R.E CITY OF COLLEYVILLE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE GRAPEVINE/COLLYVILLE ISD SOUTHLAKE/CARROLL ISD NORTHEAST TARRAN COUNTY D.A.R.E. BOARD OF DIRECTORS GRAPEVINE, CHIEF of POLICE SOUTHLAKE, DIRECTOR of DPS COLLEYVILLE, CHIEF of POLICE G.C.I.S.D. AT RISK COORDINATOR S.C.I.S.D. AT RISK COORDINATOR NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY D.A.R.E. STAFF PROJECT COORDINATOR/D.A.R.E.INSTR. D.A.R.E. INSTR. GRAPEVINE D.A.R.E. INSTR. SOUTHLAKE D.A.R.E. INSTR. COLLEYVILLE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER j City of Southlake, Texas C 11 r r C 0 M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Resolution for DARE Program --------------------------------------------------------------- Grapevine, Southlake and Colleyville have formed a grant pact to fund a multi -community DARE program. The basic concept of the grant is to provide service throughout these communities with grant funding, as opposed to the cities paying their officers individually. The City of Southlake and the Carroll Independent School District are currently funding this position. The grant monies would replace this funding and would also provide more ancillary benefits such as printing, equipment, etc. With grant funding, both the school and the City would be able to reduce their monetary input for five years by only having to fund a small portion of the individual's salary. First year grants will be 100 percent funded on salaries, and a combined total cost to the City and CISD will be approximately $16,000 for the first year. The city's contribution alone to DARE currently is $15,831 for salary, overtime, travel, etc. We would like the Council to pass the attached resolution showing support for DARE. This resolution would be included in the grant package. There is no need for committed resources at this time, with the understanding that upon grant approval, our first year funding will reduce current financial resources dramatically. Dr. Annette Griffin, Superintendent, Carroll Independent School District, fully supports this funding and has stated she will write a letter stating so. Her letter would also be included in the package. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. 1 BC/mr Attachment r� 0 mow L e 21 Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Cities and counties can accept credit cards... Fines, fees, toves? Charge �f, ities and counties can now accept credit cards for payments of fines, fees, court costs, property taxes, utility bills, car fees and taxes and other charges. It may well be worth your while to accept plastic instead of cash. Here's why: • Your bad debt/hot check problems diminish; • Your outstanding delinquent taxes may de- crease; • There is little or no cost to the city/county; • It's good taxpayer service: it's convenient for people who cannot come up with instant cash to pay for fines, property taxes, utility bills, etc.; • It can be an additional source of revenue if cities and counties work with credit card com- panies to seize bad credit cards, and • It may be faster than accepting checks, because a machine can verify the credit card at the same time payment is made, eliminating check deposit clearance time. Although the legal authority to accept credit cards has been on the books for three years, the Comptroller's Local Government Division is aware of only three jurisdictions that presently use credit cards —the Austin and Fort Worth municipal courts and the Travis County tax office. "We've been accepting credit cards for just over a year, and it's worked out beautifully;' said Cecelia Burke, Travis County Tax Assessor -Collector. "It's speeded up collections and eliminated a lot of bad check hassle --and it's really appreciated by a lot of our taxpayers who don't have the ready cash." Burke said that her office hasn't had any real problems with accepting credit cards. "We can't come up with any 'cons =it's all 'pros'. It's really a winner for the taxpayer, my office and the county." The Travis County Tax Office accepts credit cards for property taxes, motor vehicle registration fees, motor vehicle sales taxes, occupation taxes, motor vehicle title transfer fees and license or permit fees under the Alcoholic Beverage Code. Burke and her office staff provided some of the information in this report, and are happy to talk to other cities and counties that are interested in offering credit card payments to their taxpayers and customers. The Austin and Fort Worth municipal courts have accepted credit cards for just a few months. They also have favorable reports, and are very willing to discuss their experiences (see box on page 2 for names and phone numbers). We'd also like to hear from other city and coun- ty offices that accept credit cards. We are prepar- ing an in-depth report on who uses them and the experiences they have had. This report discusses the basics —legal authority, handling the processing costs and so on. Legal authority to accept plastic The general legal authority for cities and counties to accept credit cards is in the Local Government Code, Chapter 132. It says that the city council or county commis - See page 12 City & County Financial Management, November 1990 11 J C j j Continued from page 11 sioners court may authorize city/county officials who collect "fees, fines, court costs or other charges" to accept payment by credit card and to collect a fee for this service. There is also specific authorization for the coun- ty tax assessor -collector to accept a credit card (or check) for the following charges (Local Govern- ment Code 130.002): (1) motor vehicle registration fees; (2) motor vehicle sales taxes; (3) occupation taxes paid to the assessor -col- lector under Chapter 191, Tax Code; (4) motor vehicle title transfer fees under the Certificate of Title Act; (5) license or permit fees under the Alcoholic Beverage Code and (6) property taxes. (Specific authority was needed for the county tax official in order to extend the credit card pay- ments to the various state fees collected by that official. Cities may collect local taxes under the broader authority of Chapter 132 of the Local Government Code.) Processing fees Most of the additional cost of accepting credit cards is the fee charged by the bank. This can range from 1 to 5 percent or more. The law allows your city/county to recover the additional costs by charging a processing fee that is reason- ably related to the expense incurred in handling the credit card payment. The processing fee must be set by the governing body and may not exceed 5 percent of the amount charged. In order to get the best deal for your taxpayers, you'll want to shop around among financial insti- tutions that offer credit card services, and talk with other local governments that have credit card con- tracts. You may go out on bids for credit card ser- vices. Here's an example of figuring the processing fee. A citation is issued by a city police officer for one violation that is punishable by a fine of $200 or less. The defendant pays in a timely manner with a credit card. Fine $200.00 State court costs 12.50 Arrest fee 5.00 Total due $217.50 5-percent city processing fee for credit card payment:.05 X $217.50 10.88 Total charged $228.38 Note: Make sure that your contract with the bank stipulates that the bank's fee is figured on the amount due before the city/county processing fee is added on. Otherwise, you may lose money. In this example, if the bank figures its fee as .05 X $228.38, it'll charge you $11.42, but you'll collect a processing fee from the defendant of only $10.88. Banks normally provide adequate supplies of printed forms for charges, credits, deposits and other transactions. They also provide imprinting f esrc' w arr f�l/a�ur bane �a o arge tn + arcrs x� 6 accept t cam s pay process ti credit card are" M Afso, the federal law mg fee:ta their banks., H *6verwrthe laver dges not that used to p ob surcharges on credit card :allow them to pass the a"ionalcost along to the Transactions expired in t=ebruary 1984. � � customer (they may offe discounts fob { ay�g 1a `Unfortunate% a t banks avert aware�#hat it s cas but eta surcharge y #or citr`es �es to charge the processing yrnp�ej&use.. and u�sd carcF coritract`that However. cs perfec ai fob T o . as `se .extra` charges fob paying countyhat accepts credit not be wittinga)delete w x -� Q^, +„„ �., - mer a spin fee forpaytrigth I X,card is clause instead by h or won'tdelete that The state laws that authorize cities and coup- usetlr 4 Cir cast us fora copy of a ties to charge a ptocessng fee super . P ravls i;otynty Aiory'so p1nion that says the sur- more gonera[yprohibition against surd rgee on charge is OK � y 3 i t Y Y L 12 November 1990 City & County Financial Management C J L L 11, machines for the charge/credit slips. What about bad credit? Bad credit is normally not a problem. Once a charge transaction has been authorized by the credit card company, usually by phone or by a special machine linked directly to the credit card company, the city/county has its money. If the taxpayer doesn't pay the credit card bill, the bank assumes the collection burden. However, if for some reason a charge transac- tion is not honored by the credit card company, the city/county may collect an additional service fee from the person who owes the money. The amount of this service fee is set by law at the amount the city/county charges for hot checks. Seizing credit cards creates revenue The law also allows cities and counties to contract with the credit card company to seize its credit cards that are outdated or otherwise unauthorized. The county or municipality may charge the credit card company a fee for the return of the credit cards. The law does not set this fee; it should be negotiated with the credit card company. Good taxpayer service Accepting credit cards instead of checks or cash may mean a little more paperwork, but there should be very little additional cost. And it can be a valuable service to taxpayers in your areas, especially for those who can't find the cash to pay property taxes or unexpected fines. One of the benefits of accepting plastic money may be that taxpayers are more apt to pay what they owe to the city or county, especially if they can just whip out the plastic and say, "charge it!"! For more information: See the "Special Thanks" box on page 2. And call the Comptroller's Local Government Division, Toll -free 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4679. A 11 r January 23, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: We are writing to express our strong support for the new concept plan at SouthRidge Lakes which was submitted by Arvida for dis- cussion at the City Council, February 5, 1991. This plan features a 2 lane future SouthRidge Lakes Parkway with a "T" intersection. As residents of SouthRidge Lakes, we believe that several recent events have made us conclude that the construction of a four lane boulevard through our community is no longer necessary or warran- ted. Some of these events include: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will not be extended south of Southlake Boulevard; the location of the new high school will cause many motorists to use Peytonville Road north of Southlake Boulevard so that they can have access to a traffic signal at Southlake Boulevard; it appears doubtful that anytime in the near future a traffic signal will be consgrueted at SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. Based on current and future traffic projections, as outlined in the Arvida traffic study, there is no need for a four lane road either on Peytonville Road or SouthRidge Lakes Parkway north of Southlake Boulevard. The study also indicates that the two lane configuration through SouthRidge Lakes affords the city a very high level of service (LOS "A") even with the future traffic projections. The "T" intersection is also a, -very important traffic safety feature. This will force motorists to stop at the inter- section and should reduce the overall speed at which cars travel through the community. Ultimately, this plan will increase the safety of all residents at SouthRidge Lakes, especially our chil- dren. Thank you in advance for your consideration and we hope that this plan will receive your prompt and favorable approval. Sincerely, Address 1 3 o' co S �J L &we Concept Plan Petition dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Address -)d LariGr�' C �Zo c Cnk\.4 1 I U sAO -P-9- CoC/f--� /0ys' 674 /, /e C7L 1107 IA6 � /d l l S/�iCi.+✓� �� 121- Z/ Z- C :a t �\ .� (;-y ; n t C�-- e2��s��_ 1�-2-- yZ�� ,ram. d f GDy� 9 j j L or Concept Plan Petition dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Z Address AV"."- CT 90,�-77,16m-, 0 I _1 January 23, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: We are writing to express our strong support for the new concept plan at SouthRidge Lakes which was submitted by Arvida for dis- cussion at the City Council, February 5, 1991. This plan features a 2 lane future SouthRidge Lakes Parkway with a "T" intersection. As residents of SouthRidge Lakes, we believe that several recent events have made us conclude that the construction of a four lane boulevard through our community is no longer necessary or warran- ted. Some of these events include: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will not be extended south of Southlake Boulevard; the location of the new high school will cause many motorists to use Peytonville Road north of Southlake Boulevard so that they can have access to a traffic signal at Southlake Boulevard; it appears doubtful that anytime in the near future a traffic signal will be conspructed at SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. Based on current and future traffic projections, as outlined in the Arvida traffic study, there is no need for a four lane road either on Peytonville R+dad or SouthRidge Lakes Parkway north of Southlake Boulevard. The study also indicates that the two lane configuration through SouthRidge Lakes affords the city a very high level of service (LOS "A") even with the future traffic projections. The "T" intersection is also a; -very important traffic safety feature. This will force motorists to stop at the inter- section and should reduce the overall speed at which cars travel through the community. Ultimately, this plan will increase the safety of all residents at SouthRidge Lakes, especially our chil- dren. Thank you in advance for your consideration and we hope that this plan will receive your prompt and favorable approval. Sincerely, Address f 3 a f �co S :y j D n, [j 7 I' Concept Plan Petition dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Address 1 / r I January 23, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: We are writing to express our strong support for the new concept plan at SouthRidge Lakes which was submitted by Arvida for dis- cussion at the City Council, February S, 1991. This plan features a 2 lane future SouthRidge Lakes Parkway with a "T" intersection. As residents of SouthRidge Lakes, we believe that several recent events have made us conclude that the construction of a four lane boulevard through our community is no longer necessary or warran- ted. Some of these events include: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will not be extended south of Southlake Boulevard; the location of the new high school will cause many motorists to use Peytonville Road north of Southlake Boulevard so that they can have access to a traffic signal at Southlake Boulevard; it appears doubtful that anytime in the near future a traffic signal will be constructed at SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. Based on current and future traffic projections, as outlined in the Arvida traffic study, there is no need for a four lane road either on Peytonville Road or SouthRidge Lakes Parkway north of Southlake Boulevard. The study also indicates that the two lane configuration through SouthRidge Lakes affords the city a very high level of service (LOS "A") even with the future traffic projections. The "T" intersection is also a�very important traffic safety feature. This will force motorists to stop at the inter- section and should reduce the overall speed at which cars travel through the community. Ultimately, this plan will increase the safety of all residents at SouthRidge Lakes, especially our chil- dren. Thank you in advance for your consideration and we hope that this plan will receive your prompt and favorable approval. Sincerely, Address fj 1 3 0 FL -:Co S j Concept Plan Petition dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Address j L January 23, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: We are writing to express our strong support for the new concept plan at SouthRidge Lakes which was submitted by Arvida for dis- cussion at the City Council, February S, 1991. This plan features a 2 lane future SouthRidge Lakes Parkway with a :'T" intersection. As residents of SouthRidge Lakes, we believe that several recent events have made us conclude that the construction of a four lane boulevard through our community is no longer necessary or warran- ted. Some of these events include: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will not be extended south of Southlake Boulevard; the location of the new high school will cause many motorists to use Peytonville Road north of Southlake Boulevard so that they can have access to a traffic signal at Southlake Boulevard; it appears doubtful that anytime in the near future a traffic signal will be consgructed at SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. Based on current and future traffic projections, as outlined in the Arvida traffic study, there is no need for a four lane road either on Peytonville Road or SouthRidge Lakes Parkway north of Southlake Boulevard. The study also indicates that the two lane configuration through SouthRidge Lakes affords the city a very high level of service (LOS "A") even with the future traffic projections. The "T" intersection is also a. -very important traffic safety feature. This will force motorists to stop at the inter- section and should reduce the overall speed at which cars travel through the community. Ultimately, this plan will increase the safety of all residents at SouthRidge Lakes, especially our chil- dren. Thank you in advance for your consideration and we hope that this plan will receive your prompt and favorable approval. Sincerely, L -Owl Address fj f 3 0 4 Co S vb C Concept Plan Petition dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Address %3b 7 OW&W ANSI - / January 23, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: We are writing to express our strong support for the new concept plan at SouthRidge Lakes which was submitted by Arvida for dis- cussion at the City Council, February 5, 1991. This plan features a 2 lane future SouthRidge Lakes Parkway with a :'T" intersection. As residents of SouthRidge Lakes, we believe that several recent events have made us conclude that the construction of a four lane boulevard through our community is no longer necessary or warran- ted. Some of these events include: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will not be extended south of Southlake Boulevard; the location of the new high school will cause many motorists to use Peytonville Road north of Southlake Boulevard so that they can have access to a traffic signal at Southlake Boulevard; it appears doubtful that anytime in the near future a traffic signal will be consgructed at SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Southlake Boulevard. Based on current and future traffic projections, as outlined in the Arvida traffic study, there is no need for a four lane road either on Peytonville Rdad or SouthRidge Lakes Parkway north of Southlake Boulevard. The study also indicates that the two lane configuration through SouthRidge Lakes affords the city a very high level of service (LOS "A") even with the future traffic projections. The "T" intersection is also a,very important traffic safety feature. This will force motorists to stop at the inter- section and should reduce the overall speed at which cars travel through the community. Ultimately, this plan will increase the safety of all residents at SouthRidge Lakes, especially our chil- dren. Thank you in advance for your consideration and we hope that this plan will receive your prompt and favorable approval. Sincerely, Address rJ 1 3 o co S f � �Z 504'N Ci LY)c LP 14&, 44, dated January 23, 1991 (Cont.) Address -3oy fXo m It . ) e, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas, are opposed to the construction f any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecti ng the green area, and connecting Southridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road to he west and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property + `h Southridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe Woad would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- division accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately contribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lakes arkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an added risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. LIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE 48 1 :,�'. 11 �;,:►��.. 1�� r_ , r ' / /� �-yi •/ -! M r __ i �� ►1�i�li An WA A ' . & - MW KiwWOOWE _ • WN I V _1� e, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas, are opposed to the construction any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecting the green area, and connecting Southridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road to e west and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property VSouthridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe ti oad would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- ivision accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately ontribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lakes arkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an added risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. KIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE I NUM DIVIN g- M% I I 47AS IR / I d IR MY • f cam. _ � ♦ � • 4 te, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas, are opposed to the construction any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecting the green area, and connecting Southridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road to e west and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property V5 outhridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe oad would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- ivision accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately tntribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lakes rkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an added risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. IGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE �. EJWAM- i �_ `, , �' _ i �l • _/ [ems. �_ MWA � � L M MARMTAI1 WMIAN I FAR -a I e, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas,.are opposed to the construction f any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecting the green area, and connecting Southridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road tc twest and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property h Southridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe road would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- ivision accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately ontribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lake arkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an ed risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. (GNATURE d ADDRESS TELEPHONE NMI �Iffllq r� rr1 ♦�� i �� e, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas, are opposed to the construction f any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecting the green area, and connecting Southridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road to Lest and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property Southridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe oad would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- iwsion accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately ntribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lakes Parkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an ,Added risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. GNATURE ADDRESS _TELEPHONE win te, the undersigned homeowners of Southridge Lakes sub -division, city of Southlake, Texas, are opposed to the construction of any type of access road which would be located to the north of the existing pond, disecting the green area, and connecting Ce ihridge Lakes Parkway with the zoned commercial property located north of route 1709, and between Peytonville road to west and Southridge Lakes Parkway to the east. We believe any access road connecting the zoned commercial property i Southridge Lakes Parkway at this location could not be restricted to use by the residents of Southridge Lakes. We believe road would serve as an alternate route through our neighborhood by other homeowner's located to the north of our sub- ivision accessing and exiting the commercial development, sightseers, and commercial vehicles which would ultimately ontribute to an increase in traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway. Additionally, any access road connecting to Southridge Lakes Parkway in this area would fall adjacent to the recreation area for our community, with an increase in traffic resulting in an I dded risk to the safty of our children traveling to and from these facilities. CANI U ADDRESS AT RE S TELEPHONE S - ��A .i�I��A.._ 0 1 M., :I I '1". •• r 1 • • �. i 1} r� Y r 3