Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1991-04-02 CC Packet
[�J City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 2, 1991 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the March 19, 1991, City Council Meeting. 3. Mayor's Report. 4. City Manager's Report. 5. Public Forum. 6. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-01-A, 1st reading (ZA 91-02). Amending Ordinance No. 480-01, a zoning change request for eight (8) parcels of land to be added to the existing residential P.U.D. Ordinance No. 480-01, these parcels are described as follows: Parcel A: 9.011 acres of land out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2A3, and a portion of Lots 2 & 3 Spring Creek Acres. Parcel B: 8.771 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C1A. Parcel C: 8.298 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 8B, and 8C. Parcel D: 4.014 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6A. Parcel E: 2.810 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract M . Parcel F: 1.047 acres out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, Tract 1B2. Parcel G: 10.68 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, MA, 2D4, 2D5, and 2D6. Parcel H: 31.518 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2G, 2H, 2J, and 2J1. The addition of these eight (8) tracts will increase the acreage of the project from the original 826.93 acres to 902.80 acres. Owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. All the tracts are zoned Agricultural with the exception of 2.978 acres which is Zoned SF-1. The requested zoning is for Residential P.U.D. Continuation of the Public Hearing. j City of Southlake, Texas City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page two 7. Consider: ZA 91-03, Development Site Plan for Phases I & 2, Timarron (formerly known as Creekside). 165.1 acre tract out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Surveys, Abstract No. 1037, and 1038. Property owner is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Timarron Phase 1 & 2 are located east of South White Chapel Blvd., both North and South of East Continental Blvd. 8. Consider: ZA 91-04, Preliminary Plat of Timarron, Phase 1 & 2, a 165.1 acres out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract U No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. This plat includes 234 residential lots with 28.2 acres of open space. Owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 9. Consider: ZA 91-05, Preliminary Plat of Block 7, Lots 1 & 2, SouthView Addition, 4.937 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being a portion of Tracts 5 and 5A. Current zoning is Office-1. Location: North Carroll Avenue, across from Southlake City Hall. Owners: T.J. McHale; Applicant: United States Postal Service. 10. Consider: ZA 91-06, Final Plat of Block 7, Lot 1, SouthView Addition, being 1.002 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. The property is located at the corner of Southcrest Lane and North Carroll Avenue, across from Southlake City Hall. Owners: T.J. McHale; Applicant: United States Postal Service. 11. Consider: ZA 91-07, Revised Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes. This plat encompasses 148.426 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and the L.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P. II. 12. Consider: ZA 91-08, Final Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III. A 18.282 acre tract of land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. The property is zoned SF-20A. This final plat is a portion of the previously approved Phase III Final Plat. It represents thirty (30) lots North of Phase I and East of Peytonville Avenue. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. City of Southlake, Texas City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page three 13. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-C, 2nd reading. Amending the Zoning Ordinance. Continuation of the Public Hearing. 14. Consider: Ordinance No. 529, 1st reading. Amending Fire Code, Ordinance No. 470. 15. Consider: Addition to FM 1709 water line relocation project design contract. 16. Consider: One year extension of the Final Plats for Southlake Hills, Phases 1 & 2, previously granted approval on April 3, 1990. Owner/Developer: Dale Poe Development Corporation. 17. Consider: Proposal for professional services to prepare City Thoroughfare Plan. 18. Consider: Accepting low bid for the City Hall Renovation Project, and authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract. 19. Executive Session Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Section 2(e) 2(f) 2(g). Refer to posted list. A. Discussion: Pending or contemplated litigations. (Refer to posted list). B. Discussion: Personnel matters, including Boards and Commissions. (Refer to posted list). C. Discussion: Land Acquisition. D. Return to Open Session. 20. Consider: Action necessary in regards to pending or contemplated litigation. (Refer to posted list). 21. Consider: Action necessary in regards to personnel matters, including Boards and Commissions (Refer to posted list). 22. Consider: Action necessary in regards to land acquisition. City of Southlake, Texas City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page four 23. Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Thursday, March 28, 1991 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Open Meetings. Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Sandra L. LeGr City Secretary TT�' is City of Southlake, Texas EXECUTIVE SESSION PERSONNEL The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, Municipal Court Judge and City Boards and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions are on file in the City Secretary's Office. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City Council. PENDING LITIGATION The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Ray L. Whitmore, Louis Messina and Marie J. Robinson V. City of Southlake, 1980. 2. Russell Sivey v. City of Southlake. September, 1989. CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION 3. Essig Claim. February 1991. 4. Ginger Creek Estates. March 1991. 5. Margaret Freemen Claim. January, 1990. 6. West Beach Addition Litigation is, by nature, an on -going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasion, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects, in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this City Council Meeting, an executive session will be held. SLL 3/28/91 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 28, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting April 2, 1991 1. After four working days away from the office, with no conduct of City business, I've not yet caught up on everything. It looks, however, as if it will be a busy spring and summer (translation: Business as usual). AGENDA ITEMS 2. Agenda Item No. 3. Mayor's Report. The Mayor and Councilmember Hall will report on the trip yesterday to Austin with CISD Superintendent Dr. Annette Griffin and Assistant Superintendent Bill Branum. The trip proved to be most fruitful. CISD officials do not have the City's contacts, and given the time demands on Speaker Lewis yesterday morning, it is doubtful if Annette and Bill would have been able to get in to see him without the City's presence. They also were able to get into a meeting with the Tarrant County delegation. Several were on the proverbial fence going into yesterday, so perhaps the comments of the Southlake entourage helped persuade the undecided to vote against the "Robin Hood" bill. Given the potential disastrous affects of the proposed legislation on the City and school districts within the community, the trip was most beneficial. 3. Agenda Item No. 6. Ordinance No. 480-01-A. This item will add eight (8) parcels to the existing Mobil PUD ordinance. 4. Agenda Item #7-8 (ZA 91-03, ZA 91-04) are also Mobil items. Note in Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy's memo (pg. 8-1) that Larry Midtbo, President, Mobil Land Development (Southwest) Corporation, has requested that the Preliminary Plat (ZA 91-04) be tabled and considered by City Council on April 16. 5. Agenda Items 9-10. ZA 91-05 and 91-06. These are the U.S. Postal Service plats. ZA 91-05 is the Preliminary Plat of 4.9 acres and 91-06 is the Final Plat of 1.002 acres intended for the Post Office site. Since the Post Office desires to final plat only the one lot, a preliminary plat is required on the entire tract from which the 1.002 acres is being separated. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 28, 1991 Page 2 The SouthView developer has submitted a formal request for a Revised Concept Plan for the purposes of lengthening the entry median. This request will go before P&Z on 4/18/91 and City Council on 5/7/91. The Post Office has not submitted the Site Plan for its Special Exception Use. If submitted now, the plan would go before ZBA. The Post Office prefers waiting until 480-C is approved; the plan would then go before P&Z and Council. If the Council approves 480-C second reading on April 2, the Post Office could submit on April 15 to be heard by P&Z on 5/9/91 and Council on 5/21/91. (These dates are tentative and have not been proposed by Postal representatives.) , 6. Agenda Items 11 - 12. ZA 91-07 and 91-08 are Arvida items. ZA 91-07 is the revised Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes. The plat includes only those portions of the development which are affected by the proposed change in road alignment. The Council has previously approved a final plat of Phase III, however this plat has not been filed. The next item, the Final Plat (ZA 91-08) of Phase III has been reduced in size so Arvida can begin construction and move houses quicker. The remaining portion of Phase III is included in the Preliminary Plat, as are phases IV, VI, and the west half of Phase VII. The east half of Phase VII and all of Phase V have not been impacted by the street change and are not included in the revised preliminary plat. As mentioned, the previously approved Final Plat of Phase III was not filed. This plat will allow them to begin construction on this phase regardless of the outcome of the revisions to SouthRidge Parkway. There are basically no changes in this portion from what was previously approved. 7. Agenda Item No. 14. Proposed Amendments to Fire Code. We are currently operating under the 1988 Uniform Fire Code. The 1991 edition of the Uniform Fire Code will be published sometime in late Summer. The model codes are updated every three years. We are proposing the local amendments to the UFC to strengthen the code, which is a set of minimum standards. We feel the need to proceed with the proposed at this time in order to have them in place before the expected commercial development occurs. We have debated the proposals at staff level for several months. Included in your packet is background material pertaining to the different sections. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 28, 1991 Page 3 8. Agenda Item No. 15. FM1709 Water Line Relocation Engineering Contract. This will, if approved, add to the scope of services of Cheatham's contract. The emergency services agreement with Grapevine was approved by City Council February 19. The Keller/Southlake agreement concerning the FM1938 water line relocation should be before you April 16 or May 7. 9. Agenda Item No. 17. Proposal for professional services to prepare thoroughfare plan. At City Council's direction, we considered several alternatives to the development of a new thoroughfare plan. Staff determined it would be advantageous to utilize Cheatham and Associates working together with Jack Hatchell Associates, traffic engineers. Public Works Director Michael Barnes and City Planner Greg Last worked with Cheatham and Hatchell to develop the scope of services. Note page 3 of the proposal (Agenda Packet pg. 17-4) calls for the appointment by City Council of an ad hoc Thoroughfare Planning Advisory Committee, which could be made up of a couple of Councilmembers, a couple of P&Z members, and 2-3 members of the community at large. 10. Agenda Item No. 18. City Hall Renovation. Now that we are going to be in this building longer than we had anticipated, the renovation as proposed is important because it provides needed additional office floor space not currently utilized under the existing roof, and will provide the needed records room downstairs in the area currently utilized by CID. The Council committee (Councilmember Hall, Mayor Pro Tem Springer, and Mayor Fickes) worked with staff and the architects on the proposed renovation. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 11. Tuesday, April 2, is Loryn Goodman's (Administrative Intern) last day. She graduates from UTA in May with her MPA, and will marry and move to the Austin area. If you get a chance to come by and say good luck, she would remember it. We will be adding a new intern in the next several weeks. 12. Municipal Court Judoe Brad Bradlev has been workina on a proposal for a Teen Court for the City. A draft of the proposal is attached hereto. The proposal will be coming to you for consideration either April 16 or May 7. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 28, 1991 Page 4 13. Dr. Mark Andrews has submitted staff a letter Dronosal for a mobile veterinary clinic. We have informed Dr. Andrews that we will have a response to him in the next several weeks. We are looking at it from zoning and other aspects. There is a possibility that he could show up at a Council meeting. A copy of his letter is attached. 14. A letter to the editor concerning our "leash law" appeared in the Fort Worth Star -Telegram last Sunday. A copy is attached in case you missed it. Also attached is a memo he mailed to the Court Clerk and a memo concerning the matter from Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety. The Animal Control Ordinance should be before you for consideration on April 16. 15. A Mr. Huffines, who says he represents the proposed West Beach development, has scheduled an appointment in my office next Monday morning at 8:30. I'll have something to report by Tuesday night. 16. Attached is a copy of Karen Gandy's memo to Eddie Wilson, Code Enforcement Officer, concerning a zoning violation at 2900 Brookwood. Eddie has notified Mr. Walsh by mail of the violation (copy attached). We'll keep you posted. 17. FYI: The drainage improvements in front of Chimney Hills on Continental Blvd. should be completed by tomorrow; the paving in CPE should also be completed tomorrow barring overnight thunder storms. f� CEH/k?h- -- The Municipal Court City of Southlake A Proposal for the Southlake City Council: TEEN COURT Brad Bradley TEEN COURT PHILOSOPHY Teen Court is a volunteer program which allows juvenile misdemeanor offenders an alternative to the criminal justice system while allowing them also to assume responsibility for their own actions by involvement in the judicial process and community services in order that their offenses will not be recorded. Bringing juvenile offenders to a jury of their peers and to the community for constructive punishment will provide the youths with an understanding of the judicial system and a realization of their roles in the community. The community will benefit from this interaction as well. Through their involvement in Teen Court, the community is afforded a unique opportunity to become involved in the education of juvenile offenders, as well as juvenile volunteers. Teens, through their active involvement are afforded a way to learn how our system of justice works and to realize their roles in the community. IM GOALS OF TEEN COURT 1. Hold juvenile offenders responsible for their actions with logical and consistent consequences. 2. Provide an acceptable diversionary program for juvenile offenders. 3. Encourage a sense of responsibility on the part of the juvenile offender. 4. Promote a healthy attitude toward authority. 5. Provide an effective forum for juveniles to become familiar with the court system. 6. Reduce the involvement of juvenile offenders with the criminal justice system. 7. Potentially reduce the likelihood of repeat offenders. 8. Help juvenile offenders recognize the effects their behavior has on the entire community. 9. Involve the community to promote understanding and help to deter juvenile offenses. (W COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT INVOLVEMENT BY BOTH INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY IS NECESSARY FOR THE EFFECTIVE OPERATION OF TEEN COURT. 1. TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD -- This board, appointed by the city council, consists of representatives from various business and civic organizations, the general public, and students from the local high school. This group directs, oversees, and evaluates Teen Court on an ongoing basis. 2. TEENAGE VOLUNTEERS -- These persons will serve as volunteers in all areas of the development and application of the program with the exception of the role of judge. 3. ADULT VOLUNTEERS -- These persons will participate in many of the aspects of Teen Court such as clerical assistance, training, supervision of work parties and other duties necessary for the effective operation of the program. 4. COMMUNITY AGENCIES -- These agencies such as the Chamber of Commerce, Parks Department, and others will provide a means for juvenile offenders to complete their community service obligations. 5. REFERRAL AGENTS -- These sources, the police, the court, and the schools, will work with offending teens to make them aware of and recommend them to the Teen Court system. ELIGIBILITY OF DEFENDANTS 1. Persons 13-18 years of age who are responsible for offenses handled by the municipal court are eligible for the Teen Court option. 2. Participation in Teen Court is voluntary. The defendant or the Teen Court may choose to terminate their relationship at an point in the process. 3. Participation in Teen Court is based on an admission of guilt. 4. Parental consent for participation in Teen Court is required. 5. Eligible persons will be allowed only two opportunities to participate in Teen Court. At the point a case is referred by the Teen Court Coordinator to the Teen Court, one of the opportunities for participation will be considered to be enacted. 6. A person will be allowed to submit only one moving traffic violation to the Teen Court. 7. Cases arising out of the same incident will be treated as one case. [A OVERVIEW OF TEEN COURT PROCESS 1. Citation issued to defendant 2. Case filed in municipal court 3. Court sets case on juvenile plea docket 4. Court sends notice to defendant, parent/guardian 5. Case called for plea OPTIONS: A. Plea entered Conviction entered on record Case disposed through normal procedure B. No plea Defensive Driving School, or Teen Court 6. Teen Court OPTIONS: A. Case approved by Teen Court by defendant by parent/guardian B. Case refused and sent back to Municipal Court for normal disposition 7. Referred to Teen Court 8. Sentence imposed OPTIONS: A. Opt out by teen or by court and returned to Municipal Court for normal disposition, B. Complete service work 9. Teen Court recommends dismissal 10. Case dismissed/defendant notified/records updated RESPONSIBILITIES OF TEEN COURT PARTICIPANTS All Teen Court participants will insure confidentiality of all hearing, observe appropriate courtroom procedures, and participate in any required training. Participants include: Teen Court Coordinator Judge Bailiff Prosecuting/Defense Counsel Clerk Jury Defendants Other Volunteers TEEN COURT COORDINATOR Manage and administer Teen Court, a juvenile diversion program, in conjunction with the courts, police, schools, and community service agencies. 1. Through contact with the offender and parents, determine eligibility of offender for Teen Court and refer ineligible youths to appropriate resources as necessary. 2. Meet with the judge to review cases. 3. Oversee court scheduling and case disposition. 4. Develop and monitor defendant referrals and placements. 5. Recruit, coordinate, supervise, and train teenage and adult volunteers working in Teen Court activities. 6. Perform general administrative and clerical duties. 7. Report to Advisory Board. TEEN COURT JUDGE 1. Provide brief orientation of Teen Court program and procedures at the beginning of each court session. 2. Rule on Courtroom procedure and points of law; Clarify legal terminology. 3. Instruct jurors on discipline grid and types of sentences. 4. Review sentences. 5. Meet with the Teen Court Coordinator to review cases. 6. Assist in training court personnel. BAILIFF (TEENAGE VOLUNTEER) 1. Participate in courtroom proceedings. 2. Aid judge in maintaining order in the courtroom. 3. Carry out instructions of the judge. PROSECUTING/DEFENSE COUNSEL (TEENAGE VOLUNTEERS) 1. Represent the state's/defendant's interest during proceedings. 2. Suggest to the jury the appropriate sentence. 3. Comply with standards of professional conduct. 4. Carry out instructions of the judge. COURT CLERK (TEENAGE VOLUNTEERS) 1. Participate in courtroom proceedings. 2. Call each case before the court. 3. Provide the judge with necessary reports, etc. regarding each case. 4. Carry out instructions of the judge. JURY (TEENAGERS) 1. Listen to cases as presented by courtroom personnel. 2. Determine disciplines. 3. Carry out instructions of the judge. DEFENDANTS 1. Meet eligibility requirements. 2. Abide by rules of the court. OTHER VOLUNTEERS (TEENAGE OR ADULT) 1. Carry out instructions of the coordinator. TERMS OF OFFICE 1. JUDGE. The term of office for the judge shall be determined by the Mayor and City Council of Southlake. 2. TEEN COURT COORDINATOR. Term of office determined by the Teen Court Advisory Board. 3. BAILIFF. Term of office is one term (school or summer). At least two persons will be appointed per term. At least one person is to be present at each court session. The Teen Court Coordinator will be responsible for establishing a system of rotation for volunteers. 4. CLERK. Term of office is one term (school or summer). At least one person will be appointed per term. At least one person is to be present at each court session. The Teen Court Coordinator will be responsible for establishing a system of rotation for volunteers when more than one person is appointed to serve as clerk. The clerk will serve as a third assistant to the attorney, as needed. 5. PROSECUTING AND DEFENSE COUNSEL. Term of office is nine months. There will be both a prosecuting and defense counsel team, each team consisting of three persons. Initially, the chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel will serve for three months, the first assistant for six months, and the second assistant for nine months. The chief counsel will rotate out of office after three months. The assistants will move up in rotation and a new second assistant prosecutor and defense counsel will be appointed. 6. JURY. The jury will be chosen at random from registered volunteers and defendants who are fulfilling sentences. Service is for one court session. The Teen Court Coordinator will be responsible for establishing a system of rotation for volunteers who wish to serve more than once. The jury will consist of six persons, including the foreman who will be appointed by the Teen Court Coordinator. Juries should include both volunteers and defendants when possible. More than one jury may serve per session. Defendants who have been assigned to jury duty may be reassigned to other court duties if jury service is not needed. This service will count toward the fulfillment of their service time. 7. ADULT VOLUNTEERS. Term of office is two terms. Volunteers may continue service upon approval by the Teen Court Advisory Board. 8. TEEN VOLUNTEERS. Term of office for additional teen volunteers is for one term. The Teen Court Coordinator is responsible for establishing a system of rotation for volunteers. These volunteers include any volunteers not specifically named. ELIGIBILITY OF VOLUNTEERS TEENS 1. Teen volunteers must be Southlake residents and/or students in the Carroll Independent School District. 2. Teen volunteers must be between the ages of 13 and 18. 3. Attorneys must be juniors or seniors in high school. 4. Bailiffs, clerks, jurors, and other volunteers may be between the ages of 13 and 18. ADULTS 1. Must be responsible adults approved by the Teen Court Advisory Board. 2. Must have a completed application form filed in the Teen Court office. RULES OF THE COURT The rules of the court are for defendants and all other participants in the courtroom. The most important thing regarding dress and behavior is to show respect for the court proceedings at all times. DRESS Be neat and clean. Wear shoes. Wear nice shirts or blouses or dresses. (No profane or obscene language or illustrations. Also, no tank tops.) No shorts. No hats. BEHAVIOR Be courteous and respectful to all participants. Do not display anger or lose your temper. Be alert and attentive. Be well informed and businesslike. Speak loudly and clearly. Refrain from any unnecessary talking. GENERAL GUIDELINES Rise on appropriate occasions. (When instructed to, The opening of court, The recess of court, The closing of court, When addressing the judge, or when being addressed by the judge.) Address the judge properly. ("Judge", "Judge ", or "Your Honor") Maintain good posture while seated. No gum or tobacco chewing, No dipping, No smoking, No eating, and No drinking in the courtroom. No camera or recording devices are allowed in the courtroom without the permission of the judge. No pets are allowed in the courtroom. Be on time and check in upon your arrival with the Teen Court Coordinator. M DISCIPLINE GUIDE Class 1 Non -hazardous violations Class 2 Hazardous/Moving violations Class 3 Alcohol -related violations Public order violations Destruction of property Physical injury Class 4 Multiple violations/Others 3 to 15 hours of community service 1 to 3 jury terms 15 to 50 hours of community service 1 to 5 jury terms 30 to 100 hours of community service 2 to 5 jury terms Up to 200 hours of community service 1 to 5 jury terms IMPLEMENTATION OF TEEN COURT Action By City Council Implementation of Teen Court in Southlake can be effected fairly simply. The City Council should take action with regard to authorizing and endorsing Teen Court. Should the City Council decide to implement Teen Court, the appointment of an advisory board would be required. Once the Council has taken the required action, the Advisory Board would meet and begin planning for the Teen Court. Initially, standards and guidelines for Teen Court should be established by the Board as well as the recruitment and appointment of the Teen Court Coordinator. There have been several people from our community who have expressed a desire to volunteer their time to help the Teen Court become not only a reality, but a success. It is suggested that these people be contacted for volunteer positions. Community Service Organizations Numerous organizations and agencies within Southlake may be contacted regarding their involvement with Teen Court by providing supervision of Teen Court defendants during their required community service work. It is believed that every organization and agency will be very receptive and willing to cooperate and assist. The following is a list of organizations which may be contacted: Southlake Municipal Court Southlake Department of Public Safety Southlake Parks and Recreation Department Carroll High School It is expected after implementation of Teen Court there will be many other organizations within our community which will be interested in cooperating in this program. Proiected Participation By Eligible Teenagers Certainly, because Teen Court has never before existed in Southlake, any estimation of the number of participants is merely that -- and estimation. However, by looking at other Teen Court programs and their records, some kind of reasonable estimation can be made. The Arlington Teen Court has been operational for more than two (2) years and has recorded a 40% participation rate among eligible teenage defendants. For the year of 1990, the Southlake Department of Public issued approximately 810 tickets to individuals ranging in age from 14 to 18, approximately 265 of whom where Southlake residents and/or CISD students. Using Arlington's figures as indicator, Southlake might expect 106 teenagers to voluntarily choose to go through Teen Court rather than pay a fine or have their ticket go on their driving record. Additionally, when considering the required teenage volunteers for the Teen Court positions and jurors, it is expected that a total of well over 300 teenagers per year would be participating and benefiting from Teen Court. Expected Cost of Implementation As with everything else in the world, Teen Court has its costs. However, the price we pay for things can take many different forms. For example, the greatest cost for Teen court is in the form of man hours spent preparing and administering Teen Court. Fortunately, all of the required positions and time for the Teen Court may be fulfilled by individuals willing to volunteer their time to insure the success of Teen Court. In addition to time spent in the administration of Teen Court, additional equipment and supplies would be required. The greatest of these would probably be office space and furniture for the Teen Court Coordinator. At the present time, the Municipal Court Judge does not have an office in the Municipal Complex which could be shared with the Coordinator. During the initial phases of the implementation and operation of Teen Court it is felt that conference room space would be adequate. As Teen Court develops and participation increases, it is very probable that additional office furniture i.e. desk, chair, file cabinet would required. However, office space could to be shared with the Municipal Judge as it becomes available.. Additionally, certain documents and forms will be required for Teen Court. Therefore, printing and postage costs would be incurred. Considering the required forms, an estimate of that costs is as follows: Printing & stationary $450.00 Postage 50.00 TOTAL $500.00 14 It is estimated that implementation and operation of Teen Court could be accomplished with a total expenditure of less than $1,000.00 per year. (This, of course, is assuming no cost for personnel or office equipment is required.) This expense could be recovered by the city from the Teen Court Participants themselves. The Texas Legislature, in providing for the option of Teen Court, has also provided that the court may require a minor requesting a Teen Court program to pay a fee set by the court in an amount that does not exceed $10.00 to cover the cost of administering Teen Court. If such a fee was imposed on the estimated 106 teenagers, a total of $1,060.00 would be collected, which would cover all of the estimated costs. It is believed that Teen Court is a positive step for the City of Southlake, our community, the social service agencies, teens and parents. Seldom does one single activity impact so many segments of society and involve the community as a whole in such a positive manner. Teen Court has a promising future in our criminal justice system as an alternative to monetary fines in the adjudication of citations issued to teens. There is no reason to expect anything but success from this program. No :: Zm 0 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor and City Council, This letter is an introduction to a program of rabies vaccination and pet owner's registration for your community. We have established this program to help protect your residents and their pets from disease as well as to help make money for your city. My name is Dr. Mark Andrews. My wife, Katherine, and I have a mobile veterinary practice called "House Kalls" that services your area. Our practice is unique in that we have a complete veterinary clinic on wheels with all the facilities and services of a conventional veterinary hospital. Last year we conducted three successful rabies and vaccination clinics and we plan on doing many more this year. Because of our special set-up we can offer all the services of a veterinary clinic at a location of your choice. This allows your residents to also get all those other needed veterinary services that same day. Besides giving your residents the convenience of having all veterinary services at a nearby location on that day, you can also easily implement your city dog licensing at the same time. In addition to that we would like to show our appreciation for your support by donating 10: of the total rabies vaccinations sales given on that day to your city. In summation, implementing our program for your city has several advantages. 1. It reduces the risk of rabid animals in your area by getting more dogs and cats vaccinated because we provide a convenient time and place for your residents to get their pets immunized at a very affordable price. 2. It reduces the risk of human disease by controlling infectious agents in animals because we provide de-wormings and laboratoru tests for other transmittable diseases. 3. It helps reduce the future unwanted dog and cat population because we offer discount spays and neuters on that day. 4. It provides a convenience to your residents and your city because the registration of the dogs and cats can be completed at that same time. S. It provides an income for your community because we will donate 10% of the total rabies vaccination sales on that day to your city. The Discount Prices For This Rabies Clinic Are As Follows. C A T S Rabies Vaccine With Tag 8 Certificate regular $15.79 discount $9.00 Distemper & Upper Respiratory Vaccines regular $17.89 Leukemia Vaccine discount $9.58 regular $11.S8 discount SS.S8 rq IM D 0 G S Rabies Vaccine With Tag 8 Certificate regular $15.79 discount $9.00 Distemper 8 Upper Respiratory C DHALP-P ) regular $22.10 discount $9.58 New Parvo KF-11 regular SS.L17 discount $6.58 Bordetella C kennel cough ) regular $11.58 discount $7.58 Heart Worm Test regular $14.74 discount $9.58 Discount Spay for Cats ( females ) $51.57 Discount Neuter For Cats'( males ) $3LI.73 Discount Spay For Dogs C females ) 0 - 25 lb $SS.63 26 - 50 lb $68.22 51 - Up $67.77 Discount Neuter For Dogs C males ) 0 - 2S lb $43.03 26 - 50 lb $51.43 51 - Up $S7.73 For more information on this program or if you would like us to speak to your council please contact Katherine or myself.at 1/817-46q-3264. Sinc el Mark Andrews, DUM�� City of Southlake, Texas — r M E M O R A N D U M March 27, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Fred DeLorge Mr. Fred DeLorge owns a red chow dog. The dog has been a nuisance in the neighborhood for some time and has one confirmed kill and the possibility of a second kill. On February 8, 1991, Cpl. McAmis answered a call from Mr. DeLorge regarding his neighbor, Mr. Henderson, firing a firearm at Mr. DeLorge's chow. Upon questioning Mr. Henderson, he admitted to shooting at the chow because it had killed his dog some time earlier, but had not attacked him nor was he defending himself. Citation #76863 was issued to Mr. Henderson and Cpl. McAmis issued Citation #76862 to Mr. DeLorge for his dog running at large. Citation #77251 was issued by mail to Mr. DeLorge for dog at large violation, resulting from complaints filed in City Court February 7, 9 and 11, 1991. Mr. DeLorge contacted the Court concerning his citations and was told that there were four complaints against him. Approximately two or three days after Mr. DeLorge contacted the Court, his wife contacted the Court and the same information was related to her. Mr. DeLorge was given a court date of March 6, 1991. But when he appeared for court, he alleged that he only knew of one complaint, although both he and his wife were told better by the Court Clerk. At that point, Judge Bradley showed Mr. DeLorge the other complaints and he stated that he couldn't read them because he didn't have his glasses. While in Court Mr. DeLorge's demeanor was less then responsible causing the Judge to warn him if his demeanor continued, he would have him incarcerated. Judge Bradley reset the cases, giving Mr. DeLorge the opportunity to bring his glasses to Court. Mr. DeLorge's wife contacted the Court later that day and was told of the outcome of the Court proceedings. Several days later, Mr. DeLorge came in and was given a copy of the ordinance and he stated that he was going to take it to his attorney. On March 18, 1991, Mr. DeLorge paid all four citations. Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Fred DeLorge March 27, 1991 Page 2 Attached is a copy of a letter that Mr. DeLorge gave to the Court Clerk when he paid the tickets. I have also attached a copy of the citation issued to him by Cpl. McAmis. A general summary is that we had two neighbors embroiled in a dispute in which city violations were committed on both parts with Mr. Henderson being arrested and cited for city ordinance violations, Mr. DeLorge cited for city violation, and Mr. Henderson filing three separate complaints against Mr. DeLorge with Mr. DeLorge paying all of his fines. / '-',5 G BC/mr Attachments (2) rC" Worth stfir-T e"sM� March 24,1991 - LETTERS TO THE EpITO Food for thought R built. F nod Lion has even disregard_ In response to the Food Lion anti_ ed concerns voiced b law. A neighbor, or anyone who tie of Sunday March 17: and city council members ofGrap�r should wish to The article made it sound as ifthe vine. Bottom line — ' can issue a com- chief concern Food Lion is plaint against you and your dog and of Grapevine resi- not t concerned and community- have that complaint accepted and a dents for the Hall Johnso oriented as the fine issued. YOU may never receive Road proposed site w �001 I also would likeat ad color of the bricks. I a snre1mplY the husband and m d that my that until you by chance go to the YOU that myself along with thcounty clerk's office and find out. there are other viable concerns that rest ofour neighbors, are successf Then it would be too late to do any_ :far outweigh the color issue. What business men and wom thin .:the article failed to note is that the sound en and have 8 about them except to pa Proposed site is less than a Tom Smith rational backgrounds. them. And they're not minimal! Y mile from O. quarter quote that the more Try to take this to court, and you C. Taylor Elementary `'ell -educated I' are referred to another court be - School, which is on P at asunmtng he cause the judge does not want to Pool Road. If meant better educated understand Food Lion is to succeed, they need ourconcept better ) tstand hear about the fact that you never high store traffic, and that means sated"is ludicrous. Not�singieot a received said citations. How would more vehicles in the area and in- of us can understand the business You feel as residents of Southlak? I creased safety hazards for our chil- sense behind the proposed site men - If WOuld You like to have this happen ilren. they don't succeed, which is tinned above. Ifthe mayor ofa com- to You? Possible considering the severe op- munity and the people whom I was ou'�This ha , and we had Position to the site, then the neigh_ Counting on to shop at my store told peened to us nod has an empty me that the has therightn cY invaded. Our neighbor born pty building that target for van vas a Y thought the location ge to watchourhomeand, is a vandalism: si what we when he feels like i have here is a lose -lose situation, severely�r choice =nd oppce� it complain t' can call in a The article made it sound as i f choice. Of course, I am concernedop have it processed and have a fine placed on us. We are told customer service was a bigits 1 selling with preserving a safe atmosphere and accepted in Southlake. Point for the Food Lion chain. I for my children. Food Lion is con- I say this shouldn't happen. have spoken with Food Lion repre- Cued with profit, so our motives Fredrick eLo sentatives and what I have learned is greatly differ.Be that they are extremely inflexible, and attempt to placate you by telling ILyou that they have always been sus- le cessful in the ast Denise Maahs Soathlake Grapevine Proof has p . However, no been offered to show that Fed Lion has been Southlake le ash la w vague I successful i with demographics similar n to the Grapevine area in whiff Despite the bylaws of Southlake, which states there is a d we live. Especially considering amassed more than 900. t we have � °g Warden the city, does not have one. No per son has been appointed to that on petitions and pledges stating that we will not shop pointenor posi- adoes the city have an ap_ Catcher. at the store if it is The city,og does has a vague leash rOVHTEERS The Volunteer Center, a service of United Way, needs volunteers. If you .are able to help in any way, call the 'Volunteer Center at 860-1613. The •following Volunteers are needed in ;Northeast Tarrant County: *'A person to build shelves is needed :in a N"least Tarrant County a9en- *cy providing emergency services. minces. elves will hold In Personalitems. ca►Pentry and painting is imp Skill -project [ an Good Opportunity for a group weekend. • A pay supervisor who can su- pervise the food pantry operation for Margency needs is needed in Tarrantnty. Volunteer 'torkwith ►nanager. Hours are a.m. to 3:15 p.m, Monday, Wednesday and Friday. -A video assistant is needed in a -AfOrtheast Tarrant municipal library to organize video materials for check out. Evenings and Saturday shifts are available. A _- Send letters for the Srraday 1Vortb- eastMetro toLetters totheEdl Wortl► Star- tor, Fort Telegram, Northeast Suite o0 �0o Forest rd, 76022 Include your full name, signature, address and tele- phone number for verification by noon Thursday. Letters should not exceed 250 words and will be subject to editori- al judgment on length and to comply with Star_Telegram style and stand- ards. MaOMCeS are bcafed at: IN THE FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM°�Sude 100 'Nast tananf Bedford, Texas 76022 covrry`°nn'°off'Naw RA. News:6a5-2307 A��¢ 6W-2300 Managing EditorJoan Krauter Metro Editor Larry C. Lutz Sunday Metro Editor Steve Meyerhoff Eastern Tarrant Ad Manager Bob Hamilton Metro Sales Manager Earldean Pastor e The NO�east Metro is dafibuted Seven Pubrahed for the residents of Northeast Tar �YS a week in the Slur-Te/egrCM To subsc ant County and ►lbe. con 33SA837 o*dt* � *% Co -OP Money Is 3 Easy Money. p Just Ask Wild Bill Co.OP r r� dBi11 co Ca11390-782� T.,.a.,., I'm job toge ning 1710 IS RIGHT? %lilt~ IS ;E:2:^N %l? SUPJ ECT: COURT CL R:: WHAT: PROCEDURE'S IN AND CUT nF C')URT %S'Hc.N SOMEONE' HAS A DC- CC�%rLAINT FILED AGAI?:ST T% : IS IT NOT PROPER TO INFORM SAID PARTY THAT T(iES COMPLAINTS .YSIST? THREE COUNTS NZEE ,,'.ISS_uANDL::D AS FAR AS WE WERE CONCEE2M1DD. AFTER RECIEIRG TH FIRST CITATION DATED ;-9-91 , WECCMED-; YOU TO FIND OUT T:1E CHARGE, NOTHING WAS SAID ABOUT ANOTH EXISTING CITATION. ---V EN DAYS (ON DUE DATE) AFTER THE CITATION IN HAND I WEFT INTO PAY THIS ONE ONLY TO FIND I ALSO HAD THREE OTHERS, .,j WAS TH�1 REFEREED TO COURT ON THE DAY OF 0-13-91 , WHEREUPON, I WENT INTO COURT WITH ONLY THE ONE CITATION I HAD RECIEVED, YOU SEE EVEN THOUGH THERE HAD BEEN A WHOLE MONTH SINCE THE CITATIONS WERE FILED WE HAD YET TO RECIEVE NOTICE (COPIES OF THESE CITATIONS) AS THE CLERK HAD INFORMED ME I WOULD RFCI-EVE. AFTER CHECKING WITH AN ATTORNY, SEVERAL POLICE OFFICERS I FOUND THAT THERE SHOULD HAVE BE- A WITNESS TO THESE COMPLAINTS, (THERE WASIN-INT) THEN I FIND THAT FOR SPECIAL CASES YOU ACCEPT COMPLAINTS BY PHONE CALL, THEN AT THEIR CONVIENCE CAN COME IN AND SWEAR OUT A COMPLAINT AND IS PROCESSED. SINCE ON THE LAST TWO TIMES THE COMPLAINTS WERE ACCEPTED, I WILL HAVE TO SAY YOU ARE NOW ALSO ENCOURAGING ANOTHER PERSON TO INVADE ANOTHER PERSONS PRIVACY, AND ACC EPTTING IT. STILL AFTER HAVING PRIVACY INVADED, YOU FAIL TO INFORM: US OF THIS 'MISDEMEANOR! AFTER CHECKING, A?:D READING YOUR AMIENDMENTS REGARDING THE 1. LEASH LAW OF SOUTHLAKE, WE FIND THERE IS NO CITY POUND, NO DOG CATCHER, INOTH WORDS, N:0 ON T TO SAY WHO IS RIGHT OR WRONG. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE QUITE .LEGAL. I ALSO MUST SAY THAT I HAVE SENT LETTERS TO ''KEZ,LER CITIZEN, FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM AND THE SOUTHLAKE PAPER, ABOUT THIS TYPE OF DISCREPAF:CY. PERHAPS THROUGH N^WS MEDIA WE CAN GAIN SUPPORT. City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N'D U M March 21, 1991 TO: Eddie Wilson, Code Enforcement Officer FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Violation of Ordinance 480 at 2900 Brookwood ------------------------------------------------------------- It has come to my attention today through conversations with Chief Wilson and Fire Prevention Officer Stewart that David Walsh, owner of the home located at 2900 Brookwood, has plans to operate a care home for six (6) mentally retarded persons. He has indicated that he and his wife will move to Grapevine on April 15 and leave the care of their son and five (5) other residents to a resident attendant. This supervision will be on a rotating basis. The Fire Department became involved with Mr. Walsh approximately six (6) weeks ago. Mr Walsh represented that he was upgrading this personal home by adding an extensive fire and alarm system to insure the safety of his mentally retarded son and has never mentioned the operation of a care facility. They learned of this proposed business when making the requested "home inspection" yesterday, March 20, 1990. Mr. Walsh's telephone is answered as Valley View International, but he has made application to the health department as Walsh Mental Health Center. Mr. Walsh and the facility manager, Mr. Dan Johnson, have made application to the Texas Department of Health to provide this service at the Brookwood address. The property at 2900 Brookwood, as well as all surrounding property, is zoned "SF-1" Single Family-1. In Section 11.2 which addresses the permitted uses in the SF-1 district, care facilities are not listed. Therefore, under section 7.2, "any use not expressly authorized and permitted is expressly prohibited." This proposed use cannot be considered as a home operation addressed in Section 4: Definitions, page 4-8 and 9 because it violates subsections (a), (b),and (d). These subsections state that "(a) No person other than members of the family residing on the premises shall be engage in such occupation; (b) The use of the dwelling unit for the home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its occupants, and not more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor area of the dwelling unit shall be used in the conduct of the home occupation; and (d) No home occupation shall be conducted in any accessory i»■i1Ainn to City of Southlake, Texas "Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail d 1 an persona service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors" are permitted in the "C-3" and C-4" zoning districts (Sections 22.2 #16 and 23.2 #1). They may also be permitted by Special Exception Use permit in the "CS", 11C-1" and "C-2" zoning districts if the site has a minimum of five (5) acres (Section 44.12 r). I have also learned from the Health Department is making facility today. I recommend immediate inspection of this becomes operational. KP VGn /r0- Attachments: Fire Department that the State their final inspection of the that the City pursue an situation before the business. Copy of Business Card Fire Dept. Inspection Report Alarm/Fire Systems Details Texas Department of Health Correspondence cc Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works Don Wilson, Fire Chief Mayor. Gary Fickes Mayor Pro Tom: Betty Springer Councilmembers: Richard W. Wilhelm Jerry Farrier Sally Hall W. Ralph Evans City Manager. Curtis E. Hawk City Secretary. Sandra L LeGrand City of Southlake March 27, 1991 Mr. David E. Walsh 2900 Brookwood Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Violations to Ordinance No. 480 (Zoning Ordinance) Dear Mr. Walsh: It has been brought to the City's attention that application has been made to operate a mental retardation facility at the above address. Such a facility operating in a "SF-1" Single Family district is a violation of Sections 3.6 and 11.2 of Ordinance No. 480 (Zoning Ordinance) . Section 11.2 of the Zoning Ordinance lists the permitted uses in the SF-1 district and the type of facility you wish to operate is not among those addressed. Therefore, under Section 7.2, " any use not expressly authorized and permitted is expressly prohibited." Additionally, a Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained from the Building Department before any operations can commence (Section 3.6). Please contact the City concerning these violations before proceeding any further with the health care facility. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, F,u - 0ji, Eddie Wilson Code Enforcement Officer cc Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator Roger Stewart, Fire Prevention Officer CERT. # P 113 956 791 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 481-0036 "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" CARvAN E. ADTDIVS ROBERT M. AumoN DANmL R. BARRETT* CAROL ANN CARSON (W F.LaIam ELAM DAvm FELDING Josmmm GARRETT E. GLENN Gmm *BOARD CERTIMED PERSONAL MURY 'TRIAL LAW — TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALLST— NATIONAL BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCACY FIELDING, BARRETT &, TAYLOR ATTORNEYS 8851 HIGHWAY 80 WEST, SUITE 300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76116 TELEPHONE (817) 560-0303 FAX (817) 560-3953 March 28, 1991 RANDIDELIVERED Chief' illy Campbell Southla Police Department 667 North arroll Avenue Southlake, exas 76092 DWAYNE D. HnT SUSAN E. HUTC7BSON SUSAN S. JONES CHRISTOPHER H. MOLLOY WAYNE K. OISON TLM G. SRALLA** J. MARK SUDDERTH E. A LEN TAYLOR, JR. JAMES P. WAGNER **BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL APPELLATE LAW — TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION O I i W 281M OFFICE OF CITY 't MANAGER J Re: Proposed Revisions to Ordinance 470, Fire Code Dear Billy: Per your request, please find enclosed a proposed ordinance amending the City's Fire Code as set forth in your memorandum dated February 22, 1991 to the City Manager. Please review the ordinance carefully to ensure that I have drafted all the changes correctly. In particular, I would like for you to review the new Article 88 regarding wood shingle roofs. I noticed while I was preparing the ordinance that the different amended sections contain references to the Fire Chief, the Fire Chief or his authorized representative, the Bureau of Fire Prevention, and the authority with jurisdiction in detailing what person or entity is responsible for the different sections. Please review the ordinance to ensure that there is no inconsistency between these various sections. If you have any questions regarding the ordinance, please give me a call. Very truly yours, �J/6od4-A, Wayne K. Olson WKO/ kt Enclosure slake\firecode.Ltr cc: Mr. Don Wilson . Curtis Hawk ORDINANCE NO. 529 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 470, THE FIRE CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLARE, BY PROVIDING FOR LOCAL AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1988 EDITION; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake heretofore adopted the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, with local amendments as the Fire Code of the City of Southlake, which ordinance governs fire safety and fire prevention within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake deems it necessary and advisable to adopt this ordinance providing for certain local amendments to the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, in order to better protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Southlake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That Exhibit "B" to Ordinance No. 470, which contains local amendments to the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire Chiefs Association, is hereby revised as shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all references. slakeV irecode.ord -1- SECTION 2 All portions of Ordinance No. 470 which are not expressly amended hereby shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. SECTION 3 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day slakeV irecode.ord .2- that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate �W offense. SECTION 6 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 470 or any other ordinances affecting fire safety, which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 7 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 8 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time slake\firecode.ord -3- within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by kw Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. IM SECTION 9 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED• EFFECTIVE• slake\firecode.ord .4- EXHIBIT "B" The following sections and paragraphs of the 1988 Uniform Building Code are amended as shown herein: SECTION 10.206 (a) No change. (b) Identification of Hydrants or Equipment. All fire protection equipment or hydrants shall be clearly identified in a manner approved by the Chief to prevent parking or other obstruction. All new hydrants that are installed within the corporate city limits of the City of Southlake shall be painted red with a white reflective bonnet and discharge caps. An approved blue reflector shall be placed in the roadway in a manner approved by the Fire Chief. (c) Fire Zones. When the authority having jurisdiction determines that an area is necessary to gain immediate access to any fire protection equipment, appliance, hydrant or to gain access for fire service entry to the building or area for the purpose of life safety, the area shall be marked or posted as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. SECTION 10.207 (a) No change. (b) Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every structure. Such roadway or emergency easement shall provide for all portions of the first story of a structure to be within one hundred and fifty (1501) feet of a fire apparatus located within said access roadway or easement. Where access requirements cannot be fully provided, recognized fire protection systems shall be installed as prescribed and approved by the authority having jurisdiction. More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. For high -piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. (c) Width. The minimum obstructed width of fire apparatus access roadways shall be 20 feet, 24 feet when located within 35 feet of any structure in excess of 30 feet in height. The authority having jurisdiction may increase slake\firecode.exb -1- IM widths when deemed necessary to provide adequate access for protection. (d) No change. (e) Permissible Modification. Clearances or widths required by this subsection may be granted as a variance when, in the opinion of the chief, such variance provides a minimum width that is adequate to provide fire apparatus access. For high -piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. (f) No change. (g) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access roadway shall be set and approved by the Chief. Unless otherwise stipulated, each access roadway shall have a twenty-five foot (251) inside dimension, and not less than fifty feet (501) outside dimension. (h) Turnarounds. Any such roadway or emergency access easement more than one hundred fifty feet (1501) in length shall either be connected to another dedicated public street or fire lane easement, or provided with an all weather surface turnaround with a turning radius of no less than fifty feet (501). (i) No change. (j) No change. (k) No change. (1) No change. (m) Speed Bumps. No person, firm, or corporation shall place, construct, erect, or maintain any speed bumps in a marked fire lane, fire zone or emergency access easement without first obtaining approval from the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Such speed bumps shall be constructed as not to exceed the height of five inches (511) and a rise at the ratio of two (2) to one (1). SECTION 10.210 Identification of Safety Ecruipment. Keys, labels and signage necessary for the operation and use of required fire protection equipment and other emergency systems shall be provided as requested by the chief or his authorized representative. slake\firecode.exb -2- SECTION 10.306 (a) No change. (b) No change. (c) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking Establishments. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies used for drinking, dancing, or dining, when the total occupancy area exceeds S,OOb square feet in area, regardless of area wall separations from other unseparated rooms or area uses. 2. No change. 3. No change. 4. No change. 5. No change. (d) Group B. Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies classed as Group B, Division 2, where floor area exceeds 12,000 square feet on any floor or 24,000 square feet on all floors regardless of area separation walls or other allowable area increases allowed by the Uniform Building Code. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the areas where sprinklers are required. (e) No change. (f) No change. (g) No change. (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every multi -family dwelling containing three (3) or more dwelling units, and every hotel containing 20 or more guest rooms. Residential or quick -response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. (i) Approved Automatic Extinguishing Systems. Approved automatic extinguishing systems shall be installed in all stories of multi -story buildings three or more stories in height, excluding garages used solely as parking garages, without exception. slake\firecode.exb -3- Buildings three (3) stories or more in height shall have a hydraulically designed sprinkler system that meets all the requirements of the Building Code Section 1807(c), as amended. Standpipes may be combined with sprinkler systems. SECTION 14.104 (a) No change. (b) No change. (c) Group R. Division 1 Occupancies. A manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed in all multi -family dwellings containing three or more dwelling units, and every hotel containing 20 or more guest rooms. Exceptions• 1. A fire alarm system need not be installed in buildings not over two stories in height when all individual dwelling units and contiguous attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other and from public or common areas by at least one -hour fire - resistive occupancy separations and each individual dwelling unit or guest room has an exit direct to a public way, exit court or yard, exterior stairway LW or exterior exit balcony. 2. A separate fire alarm system need not be installed in buildings which are protected throughout by an approved supervised fire sprinkler system conforming to the Building Code and U.B.C. Standard No. 38-1 and having a local alarm to notify all occupants. Alarm systems for Group R, Division 1 Occupancies having interior corridors serving as a required exit for an occupant load of ten or more shall consist of not less than an approved and listed system -type smoke detector installed within such corridors in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. When activated, such detectors shall initiate an alarm which is audible throughout the building. The fire alarm system for Group 1, Division 1 Occupancies other than those specified above shall be provided with manual sending stations or equivalent alternate protection in location as required by the chief. An approved and listed system -type automatic heat detector shall be installed within common areas such as recreational rooms, laundry rooms, and furnace rooms of buildings containing Group 4, Division 1 Occupancies. slake\firecode.exb -4- 0 The detectors shall be installed on the ceiling or wall as such rooms in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and, when activated, shall initiate an alarm which is audible throughout the building. (d) Highrise Office Building and Group R. Division 1 Occupancies. A fire alarm and communications system complying with the provisions of Section 1807 of the Building Code shall be installed in: A. Group B, Division 2, office buildings having floors used for human occupancy located three or more stories above the lowest level of the fire service vehicle access. B. Group R, Division 1, occupancies having floors used for human occupancy located three or more stories above the lowest level of fire service vehicle access. C. All control functions necessary to the operation of the fire alarm system shall be routed through a single control panel or group of control panels and located in an accessible area as approved by the chief. SECTION 87.103 Sections (a) through (p) remain unchanged. (q) Material Storage. The storage of combustible materials used for construction shall be located at a distance no greater than 100 feet from a dedicated public street or emergency access easement as outlined in Section 10.207 of this code. ARTICLE 88. COMBUSTIBLE ROOF COVERINGS SECTION 88.10 (a) Commercial and Multi -Family Buildings. Wood shingle roof covering meeting the requirements of Section 3204(e) of the Building Code, may be installed only with a Type A roof with Class A shingle or shakes on any of the following: 1. Commercial Buildings; or 2. Multi -family Buildings. slake\firecode.exb -5- (b) Single Family Buildings. All Single Family Residential buildings shall have no less than a Type C roof with LW Class A shingles or shakes installed on them. IM (c) Treatment. All wood shingles and shakes shall be factory pressure fire retardant treated. Written proof must be submitted prior to installation on approved construction. slakeVirecode.exb -6- City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M April 1, 1991 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: Greg Last, City Planner SUBJECT: R.O.W. exhibit along existing Peytonville Ave. Enclosed is a revised print of the proposed R.O.W. exhibit for Peytonville. Staff has been working with Levitt Engineers and they have revised their exhibit to reflect more clearly the various lines on the drawings. We hope that this revised exhibit will aid you in your review of this issue. GL/sl City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M April 1, 1991 TO: Gary Fickes, Mayor, City of Southlake FROM: Janet Murphy, Chairperson, Park Board SUBJECT: Bear Creek Linear Park During the past few months there has been considerable discussion about the possibilities of a linear recreational park system along Bear Creek from the City of Keller to Grapevine. Myself and members of the staff have met with staff from Keller and Colleyville and have informed the other Park Board members of the potential of the Bear Creek Linear Park. With this memorandum, the Park Board would like to formally express our support for the Bear Creek Linear Park. We encourage the Commission and City Council to consider the potential of this linear park during your review of developments along Bear Creek. In particular, the Timarron development proposed by Mobil could greatly enhance Southlake's participation in a multi -city project. The members of the Park Board would welcome the opportunity to provide the Council with more information regarding the Bear Creek Linear Park should you so desire. Respectfully,, Janet Murphy Park Board Chairperson JM/mr Alex Mer i c as 1345 Ten Bar Court Southlake, TX 76092 April 1, 1991 D l�� City Council City of Southlake APR 1 1991 Southlake, Texas 76092 OFFICE OF CM SEMTAR� To the Southlake City Council: Recently Arvida, developer of Southridge Lakes, expressed an interest in altering previous commitments to the City of Southlake for the development of Southridge Lakes Parkway, a four lane road connecting FM 1709 to North Peytonville at the entrance to Raven Bend. Their request to reduce this roadway from four lanes to two lanes concerns me. The condition of North Peytonville between FM 1709 and Raven Bend is poor, with no shoulder. The road's frequent sharp turns limit the visibility of ether traffic. Most of the road has no lights. During icy weather, the road is too dangerous to use. Improvements to Peytonville are not possible, nor desired, as indicated by the recent defeat of the road improvement bond election. If Arvida is allowed to reduced the width of Southridge Lakes Parkway to two lanes, addition traffic demands will be placed on the section of North Peytonville from FM 1709 to Raven Bend. Once the new high school is completed, inexperienced drivers will begin using Peytonville to travel to and from school. When the Solona Club opens in April 1991 residents of Southridge Lakes, as well as others living south of FM 1709, will use Peytonville to access the new club. Likewise, when the new child care center in Solana opens in September 1991 parents with small infants will use Peytonville to travel north. As the Mcguire Thomas partners complete the planned second and third phases of the Solona complex, traffic will again increase. A direct four lane road is need from FM 1709 to the intersection of Raven Bend and Peytonville; as Arvida originally commited. If we allow the developer of Southridge Lakes to change zoning commitments for roads to satisfy changing budget needs, a damaging precedent will be set that other Southlake developers will follow. Your Sincerely, Alex, Mericas We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Nam�e/, , 7" j1` Address 4'v� Q.LLII OFFICE OF T p ,l 17�(' /I,e`�����r� �� y E�&.MM. 01 , 11111, 111 r1l IV �' " - - , 11� M" "'�d M-1 I ll� - 13,6 fto We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name � . � %� � may✓ � L r n Address / 3% 3 CA"C' J & 7rt`�PL- a ac,,c 3 Z(o Z 3 t 3Sq Crass i f►'bp-r b ri LLIL Sou`�1�Qct p r 3s'i Cr?-,ass % - to"-Lo /)p- ,1,e r-9 1 o Nn 1'01 Cf :�O CA, (« Ice A0 vAlt-Y W v a IN71 I�31 CO -7"2,, �!.Mffj' 0 mz� %30P3 /3W6; '/ ZK0 9 Z_ sir `^ 1 . tA 7 blr j 36 -2- LA O' C-�l 2� T-,x- Z We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Address Iw'/�:jw- WN-.--A)02M t k it. FI t\ tC , e 1 (+ / C f ♦ f /! / 33 9 t/L (c- i � . L , Tk 7 Z-- 1 � �025--l-,� �,rr ,fin S a;C Tx :2 & o ?a �3 L a C-f t�7 ,� �� s T�y 0 9 0- 3 S L 7 oaa ,l (' SG 1 Zf( �'ytos3 I ��� %oqZ lz/( C-9055 7T�-M6ee- J)k 760 92— / 3Sv 0Zo -C3 --t yv7.3 ryl -24 0 9 Z 1-31(1 �9w- 17-�Ie,1-5- 7tl��, J;�� 3�1 /3,:�3 Gyoow?o1)i4 ,4AJ 7�;o72 *e, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Jiff _.Z.0 f /.. Address 13 3 � Sl AJ ✓, `t' I NN /3j S'vvL��yiS',Z�'p!- Lei r We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. -r-. Address -7� 7�a 9� tJaQJLoa� el,a- /3 7 Coo s -16 0 �i Z /3S"� GJooD��oaK Sd�-�-K� 7X �la�z M Ztl�'i1 Cl ,Je��C�1r 13 �o waud Sah A 1a k-P 7 V J��GRZ -0 130 �sAe/ SoyJ-k (4 kE Tx, 76 69z a. x 7� 6 7�oS'z 7 Z We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. 1,,.. _.. Address 3tJ� �14 i Aker Df, jjx raL�'& 6 j 3 g 3 Fn re Si L v, - 3 415 - 122 ( - MCzS"A, O F-0 'SOQIt4C At�f—: ... We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. i 19� . Address W6, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Nam, Address ��� ;� t�.9C'��,�t-dti%y/L `✓t Scc��t�/mil C-C �j� .icy %,,A= uaA—A..7 Lisiz— p wtsar- Lne oouLnriage Laxes varxway to De CumpleLea as f_ a four lane road_per the. original..agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Address in 5 Y5 Al. Peufohvi Ile 13 q3 7e-n Aa v L i AV 7 . d 1GAML !� City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-02 Amendment to Ordinance No. 480-01 ZA 91-02 is a zoning change request for eight (8) parcels of land, totalling 75.87 acres, to be added to the existing residential P.U.D. Ordinance No. 480-01. These parcels are described as: Parcel A: 9.011 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2A3, and a portion of Lots 2 & 3, Spring Creek Acres. Parcel B: 8.771 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C1A. Parcel C: 8.298 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 8B, and 8C. Parcel D: 4.014 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6A. Parcel E 2.810 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, M. Parcel F: 1.047 acres out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, Tract 1B2. Parcel G: 10.68 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, MA, 2D4, 2D5, and 2D6. Parcel H: 31.518 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2G, 2H, 2J, and 211. The addition of these eight (8) tracts will increase the acreage of the project from the original 826.93 acres to 902.80 acres. Attached please find the previously approved concept plan with each of the additional tracts shown. The owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. All the tracts are zoned Agricultural with the except of 2.978 acres which is zoned SF-1. The requested zoning is for Residential P.U.D. As indicated on the Land Use exhibit, Parcels A and B are designated as Low Density Residential and Parcels C through H are designated as Medium Density Residential. Parcels A through H (with the exception of Parcel G) are shown as proposed residential use on the submitted Concept Plan. Parcel G is indicated as Commercial. 1 b-► City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager March 22, 1991 Page Two There were eighty-two (82) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been three (3) written responses: Bill Stowe, 1710 S. Brumlow, and James Stahala, 1535 S. Brumlow, were in favor of the zoning request. B. L. Marriott, 223 Lilac Lane, was opposed because he likes AG zoning in the area. Mr. and Mrs. Ryan, 900 S. Carroll Avenue, and another resident on S. Carroll Avenue called to inquire about the proposed zoning request. They offered no opposition. On March 7, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of the zoning change request and Concept Plan amending the residential P.U.D. Ordinance No. 480-01 subject to the Staff Review dated February 22, 1991. On March 12, 1991, I received a letter form Larry Midtbo, Bear Creek Communities, Inc., requesting that this case be tabled and rescheduled for the April 2, 1991 City Council meeting. On March 19, 1991, the City Council approved (5-0) the applicant's request to continue this item until April 2, 1991. -z C ITY OF SOL Iff AKE APPLICATION FOR AMEMDItiM TO ZONING NAP Application No. ZA q�-( To- be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it mast accompany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. c/o Larry Midtbo 300 E. Carpenter Frwy., Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 DESCRIPTION (METES Az�ID BOUMS) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE REZONED: See attachments ZCNLNG RDQLEST: FROM: Ag and SF-1 TO. P.U.D. Concept Plan This application mast be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. February 11, 1991 DATE Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared L /q ,`2 R y All U T8 0 known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this �� day of��2`� 19 I;ARY PUBLIC IN A\� FOR TEXAS Ify Cannission expires the Z>eJ day of 19 `t ) WI4II :Y^ ^.P;1 MST'! 25, 13c5 Parcel A: 9.011 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2A31 and a portion of Lots 2 & 3, Spring Creek Acres. Parcel B: 8.771 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C1A. Parcel C: 8.298 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 8B, and.8C. Parcel D: 4.014 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6A. Parcel E 2.810 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, M . Parcel F: 1.047 acres out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, Tract 1B2. Parcel G: 10.68 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D3A, 2D4, 2D5, and 2D6. Parcel H: 31.518 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2G, 2H, 2J, and 2J1. b�� 1 ssEsnuK Lffr � TROPHY CLUB, ,,,�,, LAKE GRAPEVIN M AifE= fEt ( w JU[! 3 aim DENTONCOUNTy a TARR— OUNT—Y cumT� Lut ?' INUUM ous ` SMOUKI DISTRICTBOUNO �O `IE/1 \NA Osun _ A �W IN maifT 1 �+Aff �� .� `-� M■ at � u OEIIECTr:: A f NiEtT.• NfEfi.E _. - > :. fog"` mw 3. CAfiAOU 3' r U■ $: ; Nuim SCNOEIL , sKieiKON. u ., __ -, �E•� .. : frrtKKE. • ., j ' �•; � 'M'MM�.t RrlATKiM fRt a1'=i'• , � j m 4! M - xEx, "re ,�" !:� "e:•� g{crrKF1 -'` ►fir ( 2TUNKwLEwEMERC"t= W GX of+ :'AlllflEipNC IK ;�. LfRKflt Tl 1 ` t W - $'+�L� 'o i 1 JACK D. JONNsf+Ifl $" IS i ATM YtCi 1 '- .. e^ _! ELEMFNTAIry ��' = 7 rawrwLEG1" ` yd_ $' s GLi" M � Mlplf116fT, • 1 ..� � AKMU.CST..E—_:---"` '3 S M[- Ci.►ot�:. ONo�fo+- eI 1 fspHA 3s' � 'h TFc S t g w = Est 'oft TffffE* �NI f i 1 CARMU SCHOOL 0.a�ins fuw Tf Ta Qr ' W a. ff i,u,i -,= S ' —• - i RLSWj C l0lE /n CT _ Now Lm R n f+r v' LL 1piE � -.. J� � NAILPAW A. a :`�-. - '� _ k . .. _ � : I• . • 7 E,ICIEiTE71111AEt • '�SI�, +m ssKUIIEEsle: �r. i fwJKLKKE ftTft E �. . vat ~_ I L� w cis 1 _ i fR♦�M -via— CfKTIRttf1 RTC IT/ ■ CAAROIl ELLER , an JJMIXTA.T .'�►t, a �. I — /t - - .,ui fT . i flu r I 4 a COLLEYVILLE zs ' N L i ! SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F M 1709) i -•----------•------ --•-•-----•�--�•---• t • I rA • o•• C J A POINT OF Eu BEGINNING C. • iCONTINENTAL BIND. G F W s � Q of i H Z m �. m CREEK -1 TI MARRON 902.8 ACRES ZONING TRACT LOCATIONS �- b i © COMMERCIAL Southlek• Blvd. (FM 1709) � t_n. RESIDENTIAL • • ® FLOODWAY OPEN SPAC! C • • ® OPEN SPACE CORRIDOR • Cv� OPEN SPACE SUFFER • • SCHOOL SITE • • • ■ PARK SITE l R R RECREATION SITE • THOROUGHFARE l84' R.O.WJ • • • ••N• INTERNAL ACCESS ROAD • COMMUNRY FACILRY • ALLOWAftA IIA.WUM DIU MTT IGROMU - 238 d.,—. • • NII.YYY OKN SPACE - 10%0. G"SS.CII.AGI • R • • • i i d R _ • • O !VV� R ; R C ■ • Conthwnta • • • i�. 01R 1.11Cl1 . 1 R l� R I LLE V r W .c Blvd. TIMARRON DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN BEAR CREEK CO&IM-NITIES. INC SOOTRLAKE.TEXAS r •..o CARTER & BURGESS INC. 2/"Iol 4-7 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 1 . i • SOUTHLAKE o'law Dooxity �A / % Density a� v / . ats te �• B 3/ • 1 K-VD. (F M 1709) 1 I 1 0 I Medium Density Residential fllGdlimDGGS1ty •— •--��•—•--�• Roddiential CONTINENTAL BLVD. f r- t • H z Nedi= Density .� Residential 0 m f ' •.,�: CREEK ,,, TIMARRON 9 02.8 ACRES ZONING TRACT LOCATIONS (0-9 a Meth m Density 1 Residential E U medico Density f Residential Flfedi� Density Residential of c c City of Southlake, Texas ZONING CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-02 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE of REVIEW: 02/22/91 PROJECT NAME: Zoning Concept Plan - Timarron, Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Ste. 1425 Irving, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 02/11/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Ste. 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The Concept Plan should provide a legend showing the percentage of land allotted to each type of use. Also, please note the requirements of Section 30.2-b. 2. A summary should be provided showing for each new tract the Land Use Designations from the Land Use Map and the proposed land use. 3. Please provide a computation of the revised proposed number of dwelling units. 4. The proposed commercial tract at the southeast corner of White Chapel and Continental should be graphically shown to be included in the limits of the P.U.D. * During the previous review of the Zoning Concept Plan, it was determined that thoroughfare related issues would be better addressed at the Development Site Plan level of review. The following comments are not required in Section 41.3, relating to Concept Plans, however, we have provided the following suggestions for the Commission/Council to consider in their review of this project. *1. We recommend the adjacent tracts be labeled with the owner's name, existing zoning and designation from the Land Use Plan. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 11, 1991. i * Denotes Informational Comment i cc: Bear Creek Communities Carter and Burgess j b- 1 P`ih. -f Q—fkln L.. T...,.... A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IQ SOUTHLAEM, TEXAS MARCH 7, 1991 OWNERSHIP: BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC. 300 EAST CARPENTER FREEWAY SUITE 1425 DALLAS, TEXAS 75062 PREPARED BY: CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE SUITE 250 DALLAS, TEXAS 75247 INTRODUCTION This proposed development site plan by Bear Creek Communities, Inc., is submitted for Phases I and II (165.1 acres) of the 902.8 acre Timarron Planned Unit Development. This plan is designed to adhere to the intent of the approved Development Concept Plan for this project as well as the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 30. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING The proposed land uses for Phases I and II include P.U.D. residential and open spaces. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted Uses The permitted uses will comply with those uses identified in the approved Timarron Concept Plan on pages 8-10. Development Regulations These regulations apply only to the 165.1 acres identified in the submitted development site plan for Phases Iand II. Height- No building or structure shall exceed two and one-half (21/2) stories, nor shall it exceed thirty-five (35) feet. Depth of Front Yard: Twenty-five (25) foot minimum - no more than 50% of the lots will have front yard depths less than thirty-five (35) feet. Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20) foot minimum. Width of Side Yard: Five (5) foot minimum. Width of Side Yard Adjacent to Street: Twenty (20) foot minimum. Lot Width: Eight -five (85) foot minimum lot width (90% of the lots), 10% of the lots may have lot widths at the front set back line that vary from 50 feet to 85 feet. Lot Depth: One hundred ten (110) foot minimum. Lot Size: Twelve thousand (12,000) square foot minimum. Maximum Lot Coverage: The combined area of all buildings shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the total lot area. Paved surface areas such as swimming pools, spas, decks, patios, etc. shall not be included in determining maximum lot coverage. Floor Area: Twenty-four hundred (2,400) square foot minimum. Residential Density: The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 250 units or 1.51 dwelling units per acre. The P.U.D. concept plan allows 2.18 dwelling units per acre for the entire project. 90316401.MI9 Area of Parks and Open Space: The area used as parks and open space shall not be less than ten (10) percent of the gross area. 90316401M9 G-13 S 6-AG- .RE. n i write Ch.PN Ploeo .fco�_ IT SUMMARY t - AJ. I4 OotNW J. Fonnon Sam Burnit A - 234 Residential Lots and Roadways 137,2 Acres D. r B - Project Open Space 16.0 Acres PROJECTOPENOPEN SPACE C - Swim/Tennis Club 11.9 Acres � 1 j Tr- ` °td``•/- \ 1� 1.0 Ae, TOTAL 165.1 Acres E E Don L-W.- < ° B p PROJECT OPEN SPACE 6 Am PROPOSED PEDESMAN WALKS a' 1 Rtllc Aao..• to a Pro.ldod to Adlaeold Roor000to y A PROPOSED P.U.D. RESIDENTIAL ENTRY � to ^--"—�. 33.6 A0. NaW Sins, Ughtatg We Be • fax P.ao. W/ at— camtttm In Atxordatno with . 81En.E. A U9ml.9 routs Lq ) • . , ° k 1 u CRY of Sotroasho Ro9'..nona • Landscaping = e-•-= o J aw - • SO' Raw. At Intersection ° •AG' 5 fi core J. Farttw 3� I p a _ Bnlard By S I B S B BUFFER YARD (Level E � PROJECT OPEN SPACE (Level DI cats O� OPEN SPACE 2.6 Am SWIM/TENNIS C ^ B C aZj� Iloraw�lo Phase I\.k 1L9 At- 1ar Cmeh �_ Oamoa---- ----- -- ---n - PROJECT OPEN SPACE �ir•`L��� 'J 13 BUFFER YARD1L.otw1 DJ.03 AD. • a6' �. YYY _ Lannaaaga man.Pj- -�' j A PROPOSED P.I.I.Q. RESIDENTIAL 101.4 Am Boor Crook Camuritlw, Irin °j DK Pollard = P OPEN SPACE 0" wfAlmott Aearown PROJECT OPEN SPerc _ - 1✓ �,' PROJECT OPEN SPACE BUFFER YARD 1. DI.03 Am 3%'� --�i .4 Am ENTRY • Low loll. RNatt4ng Wall. • Ughling IOnwtM Lighting) • Landoe.PDq / t � � � . SP. SW IN hW1q • of tM IM1l�RnwtlpW/ 21' fMdlan f \ r BUFFER YARDI.�e�o/ i. • N. Wme • IYdnI aNfx v n �r v • m � � �� � v v E „a � N�c �.F(, �C � -`sass/�...�✓�°�+- Y� �i+ ,` : \�;,.« `•�\1 �L'R -, .-. wv uu� .awn •te aT...� S _.r-. .Nmro'� PROJECT OPEN SPACE 'AG' 11.4 Am TIMARRON N REWIELCO PHIEH T OUTS G° L%H 19 BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES. INC. 3-T-91 V- 200' A Planned Unit Development in Southlake, Texas TIMARRON by Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Freeway Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 February, 1991 CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 4-15 PURPOSE The purpose for this application is to zone eight (8) additional tracts of land into the Timarron (formerly Creekside) P.U.D. Development Concept Plan, Ordinance 480-01. The addition of these 8 tracts will increase the acreage of the project from the original 826.93 acres to 902.80 acres. PROJECT LOCATION The tracts are located in an area bounded generally by F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) on the north, Big Bear Creek on the south, White Chapel Road on the west and Carroll Avenue and Brumlow Avenue on the east. The land is located within the Southlake city limits and adjoins a 184 acre tract south of Big Bear Creek in Colleyville, Texas, also owned by Bear Creek Communities, Inc. The attachments in this document provide the legal description of this tract and a location map. C85 l/ 1:4 :RJ III I � Bear Creek Communities, Inc. is a subsidiary of Mobil Land Development Corporation (MLDC) which was established in 1970 as a wholly owned affiliate of Mobil Corporation. MLDC has developed planned communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Texas, and Virginia. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE Existing Zoning The tracts are all currently zoned "Agricultural" except for Tract A which contains 2.978 acres zoned "SF-1". Existing Land Uses The current land uses consist of primarily agricultural uses, single family homes exist on Tracts A, B, C, D, F, and G. Adjacent Land Uses The majority of the surrounding land uses consist of agricultural uses, however a church is located between Tracts D and E. 90316401.1102 PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE Proposed Zoning The proposed zoning is for a Planned Unit Development District as identified in ordinance 480-01 with a modified Development Concept Plan as illustrated in this application. Proposed Master Planned Land Uses The existing Development Concept Plan for Timarron (formerly Creekside) will be modified to include the additional eight tracts. The proposed land uses for these tracts will be placed in the approved land use categories in ordinance 480-01 as follows: Tracts A thru F - residential Tract G - commercial/retail and residential Tract H - residential and floodway open space The attached exhibits identify the location of these tracts in relation to the existing Development Concept Plan. The residential areas for the entire project will be developed to reflect the overall density cap of 2.18 du/acre for the entire 902.8 acres as previously identified in P.U.D. Ordinance 480-01. The commercial retail area will follow the same restrictions identified in P.U.D. Ordinance 480-01. All street, utility and drainage improvements will be developed in accordance with the City of Southlake standards and those outlined in P.U.D. Ordinance 480-01. 4-11 (� TI MARRON = 1 MILE LOCATION MAP G�� CARTER & BURGESS, INC. �- SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F NA�177 9) 2 m GRASSLANDS D m r O► ' _'JOHN MCCAIN ROAD TI MARRON _ IQ EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS G CARTER S BURGESS, INC. NO SCALE TI MARRON EXISTING ZONING 4-m CARTER & BURGESS, INC. N L 1 ! SOUTHLAKE --------------•---- ,0' * FA J ' f Z, .Au B 3/ 1 PANT OF BEGINNING / G - - - - - Q 0 z 0 m BLVD. (F M 1709) ----�- - - - - - - - - - - CONTINENTAL BIND. TIMARRON 902.8 ACRES ZONING TRACT LOCATIONS 4-2-1 Eu F © COMMERCIAL Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) RESIDENTIAL • ® FLOODWAY OPEN SPACk • C • • ® OPEN SPACE CORRIDOR • /+�r� • Gam/ OPEN SPACE BUFFER • • •• SCHOOL SITE • ■ PARK SITE • • R R RECREATION SITE • THOROUGHFARE I64' R.O.W.) • • ••••• INTERNAL ACCESS ROAD • COMMUNITY FACILITY •�-'�+��!"� ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM DENSITY 'GROSS, - tlA Ou AerA • MINIMUM OVEN SPACE - 10% Of GROSS ACREAGE • • • 1 R 4A• • R •^ OUT PARCEL J• • R I c� i / ■ • Continental Blvd. • �o • .Mm 1 C R • .OUt VARCII . 4 R •• I I r / R 12 R \ R OSc -- \� �- ■ R osc � • CIAXE I R R R R OSc FOS R COLLEYVILLE Fos COLLEYVILLE .. AC TIMARRON DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN SEAR CREEK COMUUNITIES. INC SJUTMLAKE. TEXAS t A00 CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 2/11/Y1 4-ZL APPENDIX A METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR 902.8 ACRE BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 6-Z3 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR 902.8 ACRE ZONING TRACT BEING a 902.8 acre tract situated in the Hiriam Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, M.W. Davenport Survey, Abstract No. 432, J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the B. Hollingsworth Survey, Abstract No. 797, situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point in the east line of White Chapel Road, said point being the northwest comer of a tract recorded in Volume 7949, Page 1528 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00023152" East a distance of 178.88 feet to a point; THENCE North 19050'S7" East a distance of 123.06 feet to a point; THENCE North 1901T11" East a distance of 74.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 25° 26'08" East a distance of 99.90 feet to a point; THENCE North 32°40'11" East a distance of 100.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 34' 4442" East a distance of 143.97 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 2835" East a distance of 538.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 02° 43'42" East a distance of 49.90 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 5236" East a distance of 578.64 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 20'24" East a distance of 1367.84 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°51'59" East a distance of 400.04 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 16'37" East a distance of 67052 feet to a point; THENCE South 89" 28'49" East a distance of 91430 feet to a point; THENCE South 00" 18'23" West a distance of 699.80 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 28'49" West a distance of 438.04 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 18'23" West a distance of 29734 feet to a point; THENCE South 67° 05'32" East a distance of 128.55 feet to a point; THENCE South 69° 37'27" East a distance of 107.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 82°37'16" East a distance of 220.65 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 18'23" West a distance of 960.70 feet to a point; A-1 �—N THENCE South 89° 34'44" East a distance of 725.13 feet to a point; THENCE North 06° 4T28" West a distance of 2022.48 feet to a point; THENCE North 39051'02" West a distance of 33.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 01*2T50" West a distance of 50434 feet to a point; THENCE North 32° 3457" West a distance of 183.48 feet to a point; THENCE North 23008104" West a distance of 187.10 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 18'05" East a distance of 59356 feet to a point; THENCE North 04° 587T West a distance of 486.18 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 5T45" West a distance of 59.81 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 34'21" West a distance of 73334 feet to a point; THENCE North 34° 30'09" West a distance of 185.65 feet to a point; THENCE North 35°45'44" West a distance of 171.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 00°0232" West a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89034'54" West a distance of 60.01 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 03'57" West a distance of 280.18 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 35'26" East a distance of 22653 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 28'51" East a distance of 299.76 feet to a point; THENCE South 86°23'43" East a distance of 44033 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°56'08" East a distance of 925.15 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 4922" East a distance of 1075.48 feet to a point; THENCE North 89017'45" East a distance of 602.83 feet to a point; THENCE South 00°4739" West a distance of 1084.07 feet to a point; THENCE North 89°53'12" East a distance of 496.80 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 34'06" East a distance of 296.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 29'34" East a distance of 1085.76 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 51'54" East a distance of 828.81 feet to a point; A-2 G-15 THENCE South 00° 46'28" East a distance of 386.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 89" 21'29" East a distance of 260.83 feet to a point; THENCE North 89* 27'51" East a distance of 155.03 feet to a point; THENCE South 00" 32'47" West a distance of 290.48 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°23'IT East a distance of 17831 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°50'14" East a distance of 1326.22 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 1131" West a distance of 165.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 53'07" West a distance of 264.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 00°03'54" West a distance of 164.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 88° 08'24" West a distance of 192.99 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 41'29" East a distance of 202.48 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 4744" East a distance of 242.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 0000759" West a distance of 20953 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 49'40" East a distance of 209.47 feet to a point; THENCE South 00°35'01" West a distance of 166.85 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 00'43" East a distance of 417.96 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 44'08" West a distance of 660.23 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 02'05" East a distance of 25.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89°43'58" West a distance of 659.85 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°49'45" West a distance of 343.68 feet to a point; THENCE South 00°03'32" East a distance of 45.98 feet to a point; THENCE South 89* 4T00" East a distance of 723.24 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 00'55" West a distance of 757.44 feet to a point; THENCE North 89°48'24" East a distance orf 46059 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 03'42" West a distance of 211.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 56'57" East a distance of 155.28 feet to a point; A-3 4-Z% THENCE North 00° 03'25" East a distance of 35837 feet to a point; THENCE South 8903T29" East a distance of 250.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 06° 44'49" East a distance of 166.78 feet to a point; THENCE South 89°39'14" East a distance of 185.13 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 15'26" West a distance of 4636 feet to a point; THENCE South 88° 53'54" East a distance of 80.07 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 14'48" East a distance of 1937 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 0651" East a distance of 184.70 feet to a point; THENCE South 00°24'14" East a distance of 352.99 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 0831" East a distance of 117.18 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 2444" West a distance of 374.17 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 41'47" East a distance of 1319.06 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 18'17" West a distance of 57230 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 41'43" West a distance of 25.11 feet to a point; THENCE South 01005112" West a distance of 683.55 feet to a point; THENCE South 21°31'11" East a distance of 64.88 feet to a point; THENCE South 22° 44'51" East a distance of 114.67 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 54'57" West a distance of 921.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 02'03" East a distance of 614.24 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 5535" East a distance of 218.56 feet to a point; THENCE South 030 04'04" East a distance of 339.91 feet to a point; THENCE South 10°58'15" West a distance of 28058 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 52'58" West a distance of 1088.36 feet to a point; THENCE North 02°20'58" West a distance of 19.22 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 18'45" West a distance of 894.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 13° 18'30" East a distance of 108.20 feet to a point; i. A-4 THENCE South 09° 37'30" East a distance of 114.30 feet to a point; THENCE South 02* 58'30" West a distance of 132.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 23° 20'30" East a distance of 158.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 76° 25'30" West a distance of 121.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 29° 37'30" West a distance of 60.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 51° 12'30" East a distance of 55.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 76052'30" East a distance of 65.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 12° 20'30" East a distance of 50.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 59° 05'30" West a distance of 7050 feet to a point; THENCE South 01* 28'30" East a distance of 34.90 feet to a point; THENCE North 69° 00'30" East a distance of 95.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 06°03'30" West a distance of 145.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 77° 2830" West a distance of 200.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 60° 06'50" West a distance of 230.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 86°36'15" West a distance of 286.18 feet to a point; THENCE South 63°26'06" West a distance of 134.16 feet to a point; THENCE North 85° 21'52" West a distance of 371.21 feet to a point; THENCE North 37008'48" West a distance of 414.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 74"4442" West a distance of 114.02 feet to a point; THENCE North 52° 4855" West a distance of 182.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 61°20'43" West a distance of 230.83 feet to a point; THENCE North 57°49'26" West a distance of 98.24 feet to a point; THENCE North 40*01'33" West a distance of 111.34 feet to a point; THENCE North 54° 15'00" West a distance of 83.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 49°00'00" West a distance of 87.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 29°30'00" West a distance of 91.00 feet to a point; A-5 &- Z9 THENCE South 56° 15'00" West a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 82°00'00" West a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 66°00'00" West a distance of 120.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 30000100" West a distance of 37.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 54°58'00" West a distance of 186.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 11'00" West a distance of 117.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 54° 1733" West a distance of 28054 feet to a point; THENCE South 46° 4446" West a distance of 45634 feet to a point; THENCE South 81° 5433" West a distance of 6430 feet to a point; THENCE North 76°55'20" West a distance of 25930 feet to a point; THENCE South 67°57'33" West a distance of 12A.50 feet to a point; THENCE South 50° 28'03" West a distance of 235.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 61° 2613" West a distance of 95.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 63° 4T27" West a distance of 92.40 feet to a point; THENCE North 11°58'27" West a distance of 228.10 feet to a point; THENCE North 69° 4T27" West a distance of 133.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 64°29'13" West a distance of 127.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 52°3T48" West a distance of 123.70 feet to a point; THENCE North 28° 2T57" West a distance of 103.60 feet to a point; THENCE North 56°06'53" West a distance of 101.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 73° 15'51" West a distance of 70.77 feet to a point; THENCE South 79° 27'44" West a distance of 375.86 feet to a point; THENCE North 74°40'34" West a distance of 168.29 feet to a point; THENCE South 48°4T54" West a distance of 180.07 feet to a point; THENCE South 71° 56'04" West a distance of 136.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 39°27'12" West a distance of 143.62 feet to a point; A-6 THENCE North 87° 17'34" West a distance of 12053 feet to a point; THENCE North 60°29'53" West a distance of 97.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 58°29'53" West a distance of 291.67 feet to a point; THENCE North 29014153" West a distance of 188.89 feet to a point; THENCE North 10014'53" West a distance of 61.11 feet to a point; THENCE North 53044153" West a distance of 147.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 34° 14'53" West a distance of 94.44 feet to a point; THENCE North 10° 44'53" West a distance of 97.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 18° 15'07" East a distance of 8333 feet to a point; THENCE North 41014153" West a distance of 175.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 58044'12" West a distance of 33258 feet to a point; THENCE North 11° 5558" East a distance of 710.05 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 44W East a distance of 95430 feet to a point; THENCE North 00041'49" East a distance of 496.19 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 49'22" West a distance of 858.28 feet to a point; THENCE North 07° 43 W East a distance of 533.71 to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 902.8 acres (39,324,717 square feet) of land, more or less. 89016401.1301 Bear Creek Communities, Inc. A-7 G-30 METES AND BOUNDS FOR TRACT 1 BEING A 403 acre tract situated in Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the approximate southeast comer of said Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and the approximate southwest comer of said O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899; THENCE North 00' 32' 47" East, 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 00° 3T 47" East, 11.71 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 39' 34" West, 11639 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 20' 26" East, 2L74 feet to a point; THENCE North 06° 40' 00" East, 387.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 3T 44" East, 525.02 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 51° 55' 18", a radius of 200.00 feet, a chord bearing North 25° 57' 39" East, and a chord distance 175.10; THENCE along said curve to the right an arc distance of 181.24 feet; THENCE North 00° 32' 47" East, 227.86 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 28' 41" East, 67052 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 16' 45" East, 914.30 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 30' 27" West, 699.80 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 16' 45" West, 438.04 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 30' 27" West, 29735 feet to a point; THENCE South 66° 53' 28" East, 128.55 feet to a point; THENCE South 69° 25' 23" East, 107.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 82° 49' 20" East, 220.65 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 30' 27" West, 93450 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 53' 16" West, 914.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 40.3 acres of land, more or less. E:9:1114i'Clim aZtTc? �-31 METES AND BOUNDS FOR TRACT 2 BEING a 124.8 acre tract situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the approximate northeast comer of said Hall -Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, and the approximate northwest comer of said Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037; THENCE North 890 5T 36" West, 80.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 25.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South, 203.50 feet to a point; THENCE South 850 23' 22" East, 248.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 38° 31' 18" West, 194.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 030 43' 17" East, 123.26 feet to a point; THENCE South 140 12' 57" West, 154.74 feet to a point; THENCE South 300 46' 49" West, 267.71 feet to a point; THENCE South 250 31' 37" West, 27150 feet to a point; THENCE South 030 3T 26" East, 300.60 feet to a point; THENCE South 120 48' 31" East, 599.93 feet to a point; THENCE North 860 49' 13" East, 90.14 feet to a point; THENCE North 42° 48' 34" East, 129.50 feet to a point; THENCE South 56° 13' 01" East, 170.85 feet to a point; THENCE South 02° 57' 17" West, 155.21 feet to a point; THENCE South 37° 45' 59" East, 600.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 44° 21' 23" East, 188.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 34° 36' 35" West, 487.28 feet to a point; THENCE North 69° 47' 27" West, 98.20 feet to a point; .�1 0 6 -3z. THENCE South 64° 29' 13" West, 127.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 52° 3T 48" West, 123.70 feet to a point; THENCE North 28° 27' 57" West, 103.60 feet to a point; THENCE North 56° 06' 53" West, 101.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 73° 15' 51" West, 70.77 feet to a point; THENCE South 79° 2T 44" West, 375.86 feet to a point; THENCE North 74° 40' 34" West, 168.29 feet to a point; THENCE South 480 4T 54" West, 180.07 feet to a point; THENCE South 71° 56' 04" West, 136.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 39" 27' 12" West, 143.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 87° 17' 34" West, 12053 feet to a point; THENCE North 60* 29' 53" West, 97.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 58° 29' 53" West, 291.67 feet to a point; THENCE North 29° 14' 53" West, 188.89 feet to a point; THENCE North 10° 14' 53" West, 61.11 feet to a point; THENCE North 53° 44' 53" West, 147.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 34° 14' 53" West, 94.44 feet to a point; THENCE North 100 44, 53" West, 97.22 feet to a point; THENCE North 18° 15' 07" East, 8333 feet to a point; THENCE North 41° 14' 53" West, 175.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 58° 44' 12" West, 33258 feet to a point; THENCE North 11° 55' 58" East, 710.05 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 44' 35" East, 95430 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 41' 49" East, 496.19 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 49' 22" West, 858.28 feet to a point; THENCE North 07° 43' 26" East, 533.71 feet to a point; 89016401.D02 `' 4-33 THENCE North 00° 23' 52" East, 135.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 36' 44" East, 438.91 feet to a point; " THENCE North W 23' 28" East, 178.07 feet to a point; THENCE North, 160.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 12° iT 18" West, 313.07 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 52' 36" East, 1113.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 124.8 acres of land, more or less. 89016401.D02 i 6 3 CREEKSIDE A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC. ONE FOUNTAIN PLAZA 11911 FREEDOM DRIVE SUITE 400 RESTON, VIRGINIA 22090-5605 SEPTEMBER, 1989 PREPARED BY: DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 DALLAS, TEXAS 75247•-" t� ( -35 CONTENTS TEXT PROJECT INTENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 OWNERSHIP AND OWNERS ASSOCIATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 PHASE I LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 EXHIBITS LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 EXISTING ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 PHASE I LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 APPENDIX A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY B. DRAINAGE STUDY, MAJOR UTILITY LAYOUT, AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN 4-36 PROJECT INTENT Creekside' is envisioned as a residential community designed around an open space concept. The plan provides for individual neighborhood developments with community support facilities and amenities such as parks, recreation, schools, convenient shopping, and community facilities such as a library, church and day care center. Developing under the Southlake Planned Unit Development Ordinance will allow for a more creative and flexible environmentally sensitive community. In keeping with the intent of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance the plan will provide the following: I. Defineable residential neighborhoods with a variety of home styles. 2. Neighborhood shopping facilities designed to serve and blend in with this master planned community. 3. Community facilities which support and assist the residents of this project. 4. Amenities and recreation areas which are integrated with the neighborhoods to provide high quality living environments. 5. An elementary school site which will be reserved for the school district to support this planned community. 6. A minimum of 10% of the project's land will be devoted to open space. Be G-31 OWNERSHIP Bear Creek Communities, Inc. is a subsidiary of Mobil Land Development tow Corporation (MLDC) which was established in 1970 as a wholly owned affiliate of Mobil Corporation. MLDC has developed planned communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Texas, and Virginia. Bear Creek Communities, Inc. fully intends to develop and exercise unified development control of this project. The Company's staff of experienced developers, planners, architects, and engineers provides the careful planning and design necessary for the environmental sensitivity, recreational diversity, community compatibility, and quality which is characteristic of MLDC planned developments. It is estimated that 15 to 20 years will be required to complete the development of this property. OWNERS ASSOCIATION/DESIGN REVIEW An Owners Association(s) will be set up to own and maintain common property conveyed to property owners in this project. The association(s) will be non-profit with legal powers to assess property owners for maintenance of grounds and/or improvements owned by the association. The association(s) will meet City requirements and guidelines but not necessarily the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. As with all MLDC Communities, a Design Review Board with Design Guidelines will be established and maintained throughout the course of development. Both the Home Owners Association and Design Review Board will be in place for the initial development. -2- b-31 LOCATION The property is an 826 acre tract located in an area bounded generally by F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) on the north, Big Bear Creek on the south, White Chapel Road on the west and Carroll Avenue and Brumlow Avenue on the east. This land is located within the Southlake city limits and adjoins a 184 acre tract south of Big Bear Creek in Colleyville, Texas, also owned by Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Appendix "A" in this document provides the legal description of this tract. Ca -3- 1'-1 YLE G -37 LOCATION MAP DAWON"WI D"M MMMO 000ra"MOM EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE EXISTING ZONING The tract is currently zoned "Agricultural" except for the Oakwood Country Estates and The Glory Place subdivisions north of Continental Boulevard which are zoned SF-1 and a tract zoned MH (mobil home) located on the south side of the intersection of Carroll Avenue at Continental Boulevard. The existing zoning exhibit on page 5 illustrates this information. EXISTING LAND USES The current land uses consist primarily of agricultural uses with a few single family homes located along Continental Boulevard. ADJACENT LAND USES The majority of the surrounding land uses consist of agricultural uses, however, Diamond Circle Estates is a single family estate subdivision located north of Southlake Boulevard. Several single family dwellings which are not part of a platted subdivision are interspersed around this tract. The Hidden Acres subdivision is adjacent to this tract on the south side of Bear Creek in Colleyville. PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE PROPOSED ZONING The proposed zoning is for a Planned Unit Development District as identified in the Southlake Zoning Ordinance, Section 32. The zoning is submitted under section 32.7, item 2.b. as a Concept Development Plan. Development Site Plans will be submitted for approval prior to the platting of each phase. PROPOSED MASTER PLANNED LAND USES The adopted Master Plan for Southlake indicates that a substantial portion of the property be medium density (1 acre lots or smaller). This community is a mixed -use P.U.D. with commercial and residential land uses integrated with parks, open spaces, community facilities, recreation sites and a school site. Since the majority of the project is residential,,:and open spaces, the combined density is estimated to be equivalent to the SF-20 maximum allowable density of 2.18 du/acre for the entire project. -4- 00 HLAKE BLVD. FM 1708 SF-1 /SF -I THE GLO 3 PLACE n NO SCALE A A KWOOD UNTRY TATES 5 G-4I U SF-1/MH R A CREEKSIDE EXISTING ZONING DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Appendix "B" in this document meets ordinance requirements by providing a preliminary drainage study, utility layout and major thoroughfare plan. A general description of the existing site conditions is identified in the following text. TOPOGRAPHY The site consists of gently rolling topography with slopes of 2-5 percent over the majority of the site. The drainageways provide some steeper sloped areas which create some distinctive promontories. VEGETATION Large areas with mature trees exist along the drainage ways, creeks, flood plains, and fence lines. The majority of large trees exist south of Continental Boulevard in the Big Bear Creek tributaries and flood plain. The remainder of the site is primarily pasture land and grass land. DRAINAGE The site generally drains southward to Big Bear Creek or to several tributaries which provide local drainage. Approximately 46 acres of land lies within the 100-year flood plain of Big Bear Creek. WATER AND SEWER The City of Southlake has existing 6-12 inch lines along most of the perimeter streets to this project. There is however, no sewer available in the immediate area of this project. THOROUGHFARES Continental Boulevard bisects the site and provides east/west circulation. FM 1709 provides access to the far north portion of the tract. Access is also available from the east on Brumlow Avenue and from the west on White Chapel Boulevard. -6- caj JOHN MCCAIN ROAD 1-7 CREEKSIDE T i EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS �_� DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN The Development Concept Plan is consistent with the intent of the Southlake Planned Unit Development District ordinance. This concept plan identifies and locates the proposed land uses and illustrates the integration of these land uses in a master planned residential community. A description of each land use follows. RETAIL Neighborhood shopping, and community commercial services will be accomodated in the commercial locations shown on the Development Concept Plan. The intent of these commercial areas is to provide "part of the land used for non-residential purposes, such as shopping or employment centers" as identified in the Southlake P.U.D. ordinance. These commercial centers are intended to serve the neighborhoods and residents of this planned community. The types of uses will be compatible with the list identified in the C-2 Local Commercial Retail section of the Southlake zoning ordinance. If contiguous out -parcels of land are added to the P.U.D. and provide a desirable location for commercial uses then the option is open to increase the acreage of commercial land in this P.U.D., following normal zoning procedures, to accommodate those out -parcels. RESIDENTIAL The residential land uses are intended to provide neighborhood areas which are cohesive and create a sense of community. These neighborhoods will provide a variety of housing opportunities which are integrated into the amenities and open spaces of the planned community. They will be creatively designed to provide quality living environments within a master planned framework. These neighborhoods will be planned within the intent of the Southlake P.U.D. ordinance to provide a variety of residential styles which may include "dwelling units grouped into clusters, allowing an appreciable amount of land for open space" as well as "higher densities than conventional single-family projects of the same acreage". The residential areas will be developed to reflect an overall density cap of 2.18 du/acre for the entire tract (826 acres). If contiguous out -parcels of land are added to the P.U.D. for residential uses then the 2.18 du/acre density will be applied to each out -parcel. Specific lot arrangement, lot sizing, street patterns, or specific locations of facilities are not defined in this Development Concept Plan, and will be addressed in subsequent Development Site Plans, as per Section 32.7 item 2 (b) in the Southlake Planned Unit Development District ordinance. 4-44 OPEN SPACE The open spaces which will provide a common bond throughout the planned community, will be incorporated into the neighborhoods to a level of quality and consistency. This continuity of open space is consistent with the intent of the Southlake P.U.D. ordinance which incorporates "dwelling units grouped into clusters, allowing an appreciable amount of land for open space". Open spaces in this community satisfies the 10% open space requirements of the P.U.D. ordinance. Open Space Buffer Open space buffers will provide physical separation between individual residential areas and other uses. These buffers will generally be located in the areas indicated on the development concept plan. These areas in some cases will coincide with existing vegetation areas and drainage ways. Other buffer areas not within natural areas, will be created to reinforce neighborhood boundaries. Open Space Corridor These areas provide a continuous greenbelt which separates and distinguishes individual neighborhoods and other land uses. Whereever possible existing vegetation and drainage patterns are incorporated into these areas. Floodwav Open Space Big Bear Creek and its' tributaries within this development in Southlake contain approximately 46 acres of floodway. This area will be included in the open space of this community. The combined open space corridor and floodway open space may be left in their natural state or may be developed into open space recreation amenities. Park Sites Park sites are illustrated on the plan to meet the needs of the neighborhoods in this planned community. A park site may be located adjacent to the proposed elementary school site to facilitate a joint use arrangement. Other sites are provided within neighborhoods. These park sites will be approximately 1 to 5 acres in size and may be developed or undeveloped. Park sites additional to those shown on the concept plan may be added as development proceeds. Major Recreation Sites Two major recreation sites are programmed to provide recreation amenities for the entire planned community. They will be located in prominent locations as illustrated on the Development Concept Plan. These sites will contain community -wide recreation facilities which will be identified when the site development plans are submitted. The northern site is located within a commercial area to provide a more commercial type of recreation facility. The southern site, when developed, may provide support commercial services such as food and beverage sales, and recreation equipment rental and sales. Ma L-15 SCHOOL SITE The developer is reserving an elementary school site of approximately 10 acres in the general location of the Continental Blvd./Carroll Avenue intersection. This eventually will serve the residents of this planned community if it is desired by the Carroll Independent School District. If during the development of this project it is determined by the School Board that an elementary school is not required then the site shall be developed for residential land uses. COMMUNITY FACILITIES This planned development contains community facility sites which are intended to provide facilities that are compatible with and serve the community. These facilities may include churches, day care facilities, libraries, community centers, and other community oriented semi-public uses. These sites will be made available for this planned community as the need arises through the development process. PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE Continental Boulevard will be improved to an 84' right-of-way thoroughfare to provide east/west access through the planned development. The alignment of this thoroughfare may deviate from its current alignment however, along the same general corridor. The improvements to this roadway will occur in phases that parallel the phased development of this project. The City of Southlake will provide assistance in obtaining right-of-way on property not owned by Bear Creek Communities, Inc. INTERNAL ACCESS ROAD An internal north/south access road access between Southlake Boulevard This access road may also extend alignment may generally be located Plan. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN (60' R.O.W.) is programmed to provide (F.M. 1709) and Continental Boulevard. south of Continental Boulevard. The as indicated on the Development Concept The following exhibit is the Development Concept Plan. It is a conceptual guideline for development and generally illustrates the location and configuration of the roads and open spaces which are flexible and may change as to specific location as individual development phases are planned and Development Site Plans are submitted. �IXI# • 1 -10- �_q4 © aorwRa.a iouthbko INC CPU 17"1 = Rc�oomw< • • ROOM•r apes WACI C i - •� ® as we• awaso i • L"`..� ap wCa •uppte WHOM an ■ PARK En •i MCRLATWN UM • R . R THMX VAFA ur RawJ • • • ••N• WrVKLL ALCM ROAD • • A cmuuwrr pAcwrr • • .{i9•Aaf •A1�f) eu�rr wa.N - ar arm � r..Yr ary .rn - fs a M= AnaAaa • • • I R R R M r..' R 0 FOS R CREEKSIDE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN �-�— BEAA CREEK CCMMLMTMS. W- r SCIUTKLAKF- TEXAS q �H 0043W" COIMORArM PHASE I LOCATION _ The first phase area for development will generally occur adjacent to Continental Boulevard on the west side of the planned development. Approximately 75 to 100 acres will be developed during this phase to provide between 150 to 200 residential lots. The approximate location of Phase I is illustrated on the following exhibit. A development site plan will be submitted at a later date for this phase as per section 32.7, item 2(b) in the Southlake Planned Unit Development District ordinance. Development is anticipated to begin within 3 years. -12- Im Sou Wo e1vtL (FH 1709) � Maaoaen.i ® R000..r am swa ® va area aoewoa ■ ..RR am ••N• WrtM{ML ALCM MAD = i • A COUNUMT F&AMM .ue■...a ..W. •■■rr. ■wow - L■ r.o. R PHASE 1 cow • Cont ital Bhd Iurlow� E R R a R • • R i OSC • OSC i R • � R ti• v R •••• R OSC FOS •� R CiaLEYVIIE _ CCLLEYVILLE FOS • Y � Y CREEKSIDE PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN _ -- BEM CREEK COAMU ff= NG - Yr SOUNLAX . TEXAS mwn - w.... 13 4_ 49 A APPENDIX A METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR 826 ACRE BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 40 50 / �v J , 4� C=/ W� 3/ POINT OF BEGINNING& I • SOUTHLAKE BUD. (F M 1709) 826.386 ACRE ZONING TRACT 4-51 EXHIBIT A-1 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR 826.386 ACRE ZONING TRACT Being a 827.821 acre tract situated in the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, M.W. Davenport, Abstract No. 432, J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the *B. Hollingsworth Survey, Abstract No. 797, situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particarly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point in the east line of White Chapel Road, said point being the northwest corner of a tract recorded in Volume 7949, Page 1528 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 890 48' 31" East a distance of 509.97 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 11' 28" West a distance of 45.14 feet to a point; THENCE South 86' 30' 59" East a distance of 122.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 11' 28" East a distance of 11.48 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 48' 32" East a distance of 156.68 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 00' 57" West a distance of 278.12 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 06' 12" West a distance of 367.59 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 52' 36" East a distance of 578.63 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 20' 24" East a distance of 1367.84 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 51' 59" East a distance of 400.04 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 16' 37" East a distance of 570.52 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 28' 49" East a distance of 914.30 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 18' 23" West a distance of 699.80 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 28' 49" West a distance of 438.03 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 18' 23" West a distance of 297.34 feet to a point; THENCE South 67' 05' 32" East a distance of 128.55 feet to a point; THENCE South 69' 37' 27" East a distance of 107.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 82' 37' 16" East a distance of 220.65 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 18' 23" West a distance of 960.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 34' 44" East a distance of 725.13 feet to a point; THENCE North;,06° 47' 28" West a distance of 2022.48 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 41' 42" East a distance of 392.14 feet to a point; THENCE North 010 02' 00" West a distance of 829.62 feet to a point; THENCE South 87' 30' 24" West a distance of 20.05 feet to a point; THENCE North 01' 18' 17" West a distance of 507.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 57' 45' West a distance of 59.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 02' 54' 51" East a distance of 23.29 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 41' 04" West a distance of 435.95 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 48' 08" West a distance of 889.60 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 55' 53" East a distance of 1041.98 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 49' 22" East a distance of 1075.48 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 17' 45" East a distance of 602.83 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 47' 39" West a distance of 1084.07 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 53' 12" East a distance of 496.80 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 34' 06" East a distance of 296.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 29' 34" East a distance of 1085.76 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 51' 54" East a distance of 828.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 46' 28" East a distance of 386.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 21' 29" East a distance of 260.83 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 27' 51" East a distance of 155.03 feet to a point; THENCE South 000 32' 47" West a distance of 290.48 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 23' 12" East a distance of 178.31 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 22' 18" East a distance of 661.69 feet to a point; THENCE South 00° 01' 44" West a distance of 329.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 24' 42" East a distance of 207.11 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 02' 25" East a distance of 577.62,feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 39' 22" East a distance of 452.01 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 00' 43" East a distance of 417.96 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 38' 21" West a distance of 209.21 feet to a point; THENCE North 89° 46' 49" West a distance of 451.02 feet to a point; A-2 G-53 THENCE North 00' 02' 05" East a distance of 25.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 43' 58" West a distance of 659.85 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 02' 37" West a distance of 923.72 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 07' 32" West a distance of 335.43 feet to a point; THENCE South 000 26' 49" West a distance of 965.64 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 47' 00" East a distance of 723.24 feet to a point; THENCE South 000 00' 55" West a distance of 757.44 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 48' 24" East a distance of 460.59 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 03' 42" West a distance of 211.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 56' 57" East a distance of 155.28 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 03' 25" East a distance of 358.37 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 37' 29" East a distance of 250.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 060 44' 49" East a distance of 166.78 feet to a point; THENCE South 890 39' 14" East a distance of 185.13 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 15' 26" West a distance of 570.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 880 53' 54" East a distance of 79.96 feet to a point; THENCE North 00° 14' 48" West a distance of 570.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 89° 06' 51" East a distance of 184.70 feet to a point; THENCE South 000 24' 14" East a distance of 352.99 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 08' 31" East a distance of 117.18 feet to a point; THENCE North 000 24' 44" West a distance of 374.17 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 41' 47" East a distance of 1319.06 feet to a point; THENCE South 000 18' 17" West a distance of 572.30 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 41' 43" West a distance of 25.11-feet to a point; THENCE South 01' 05' 12" West a distance of 683.55 feet to a point; THENCE South 21' 31' 11" East a distance of 64.88 feet to a point; THENCE South 22' 44' 51" East a distance of 114.67 feet to a point; A-3 G •54 THENCE South 89' 54' 57" West a distance of 921.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' 02' 03" East a distance of 614.24 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 55' 35" East a distance of 218.56 feet to a point; - THENCE South 03' 04' 04" East a distance of 339.91 feet to a point; THENCE South 10' 58' 15" West a distance of 280.58 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 52' 58" West a distance of 1088.36 feet to a point; THENCE North 02' 02' 58" West a distance of 19.22 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 18' 45" West a distance of 894.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 13' 18' 30" East a distance of 108.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 09' 37' 30" East a distance of 114.30 feet to a point; THENCE South 02' 58' 30" West a distance of 132.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 23' 20' 30" East a distance of 158.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 76' 25' 30" West a distance of 121.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 29' 37' 30" West a distance of 60.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 51' 12' 30" East a distance of 55.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 76' 52' 30" East a distance of 65.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 12' 20' 30" East a distance of 50.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 59' 05' 30" West a distance of 70.50 feet to a point; THENCE South 01' 28' 30" East a distance of 34.90 feet to a point; THENCE North 69' 00' 30" East a distance of 95.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 06' 03' 30" West a distance of 145.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 77' 28' 30" West a distance of 200.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 60' 06' 50" West a distance of 230.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 86' 36' 15" West a distance of 286.18 feet to a point; THENCE South 63' 26' 06" West a distance of 134.16 feet to a point; THENCE North 85' 21' 52" West a distance of 371.21 feet to a point; THENCE North 37' 08' 48" West a distance of 414.00 feet to a point; THENCE North•74' 44' 42" West a distance of 114.02 feet to a point; A-4 G- 55 THENCE North 52' 48' 55" West a distance of 182.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 61' 20' 43" West a distance of 230.83 feet to a point; THENCE North 57' 49' 26" West a distance of 98.24 feet to a point; THENCE North 40' 01' 33" West a distance of 111.34 feet to a point; THENCE North 54' 15' 00" West a distance of 83.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 49' 00' 00" West a distance of 87.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 29' 30' 00" West a distance of 91.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 56' 15' 00" West a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 82' 00' 00" West a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 66' 00' 00" West a distance of 120.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 300 00' 00" West a distance of 37.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 54' 58' 00" West a distance of 186.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 11' 00" West a distance of 117.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 54' 17' 33" West a distance of 280.54 feet to a point; THENCE South 46' 44' 46" West a distance of 456.34 feet to a point; THENCE South 81' 54' 33" West a distance of 64.30 feet to a point; THENCE North 760 55' 20" West a distance of 259.30 feet to a point; THENCE South 67° 57' 33" West a distance of 120.50 feet to a point; THENCE South 50° 28' 03" West a distance of 235.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 610 26' 33" West a distance of 95.20 feet to a point; THENCE North 63' 42' 27" West a distance of 92.40 feet to a point; THENCE North 11° 58' 27" West a distance of 228.10 feet to a point; THENCE North 69' 47' 27" West a distance of 133.20 feet to a point; THENCE South 64. 29' 13" West a distance of 127.04.feet to a point; THENCE South 520 37' 48" West a distance of 123.70 feet to a point; THENCE North 28' 27' 57" West a distance of 103.60 feet to a point; THENCE North 56' 06' 53" West a distance of 101.62 feet to a point; THENCE North:73° 15' 51" West a distance of 70.77 feet to a point; A-5 G-5b THENCE South 79' 27' 44" West a distance of 375.86 feet to a point; THENCE North 74' 40' 34" West a distance of 168.29 feet to a point; THENCE South 48' 47' 54" West a distance of 180.07 feet to a point; - THENCE South 710 56' 04" West a distance of 136.81 feet to a point; THENCE South 39' 27' 12" West a distance of 143.62 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 13' 29" West a distance of 1003.15 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 25' 30" West a distance of 731.24 feet to a point; THENCE North 00' 25' 37" West a distance of 527.10 feet to a point; THENCE North 89' 49' 22" West a distance of 858.28 feet to a point; THENCE North 07' 43" 26" East a distance of 533.71 to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 827.821 acres (36,036,351 sq. ft.) of land, more or less. SAVE AND EXCEPT Being a 0.895 acre tract of land situated in a tract recorded in Volume 7303, Page 572 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas said tract being located in the D.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwest corner of aforesaid tract recorded in Volume 7303, Page 572; THENCE North 000 02' 37" West a distance of 350.19 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 41' 22 East a distance of 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 00° 03' 19" East a distance of 254.82 feet to a point; THENCE South 89' 41' 22" East a distance of 128.80 feet to a point; THENCE South 11' 56' 39" East a distance of 173.88 feet to a point; THENCE South 00' O1' 18" West a distance of 84.90 feet to a point; THENCE North 890 41' 22" West a distance of 165.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.895 acres (38,963 sq. ft.) of land, more or less. kn:03086M&B A-6 APPENDIX B ENGINEERING REPORT FOR 826 ACRE BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPNENT IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS &-58 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE I. INTRODUCTION 1-01 General 1-02 Proposed Development 1-03 Purpose and Scope of Study II. DRAINAGE 2-01 General 2-02 Drainage Criteria 2-03 Reclamation III. WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES 3-01 Existing Waterlines 3-02 Proposed Waterline System 3-03 Existing Sanitary Sewers 3-04 Big Bear Creek Interceptor 3-05 Proposed Sewer System IV. THOROUGHFARES 4-01 Existing Thoroughfares 4-02 City Thoroughfare Master Plan 4-03 Proposed Thoroughfares FIGURES B-1 Location Map B-2 Drainage Area Map B-3 Flood Plain and Floodway 6 ,5? —1 B-1 B-1 B-3 B-4 B-4 B-6 B-8 B-8 B-8 B-9 B-9 B-10 B-10 B-10 B-2 B-5 B-7 I. INTRODUCTION _ 1-01 GENERAL Bear Creek Communities, Inc. (a subsidiary of Mobil Land Development (Southwest) Corporation) proposes to develop 826 acres of land in the southeast area of the City of Southlake, Texas. An adjacent 184 acres will be developed within the City of Colleyville, Texas. The 826 acre tract is bounded generally on the south by Big Bear Creek, on the west by White Chapel Road, on the north by F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard), and on the east by Carroll Avenue and Brumlow Avenue. A location map is included as Exhibit B-1. 1-02 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will consist of approximately 801 acres of residential area and approximately 25 acres of retail area. A minimum of 10% of the total area will remain as open space. The development will be constructed in numerous phases over a several year time period. Each phase will include the necessary streets, drainage, waterlines, and sanitary sewer lines to serve the area to be developed. B-1 L-40 C. dk V - I MILE LOCATION MAP -�` DANNENSAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1-03 PURPOSE AND SCOPE Of STUDY - The purpose of this study is to generally discuss engineering issues related to the development of the subject tract and to indicate how these issues will be addressed during final design of each phase of the development. The scope of the study is limited to the following issues: a. drainage; b. water and sanitary sewer utilities, and c. thoroughfares. B-3 4442 II. DRAINAGE - 2-01 GENERAL - The proposed development lies adjacent to and north of Big Bear Creek which is a tributary to the West Fork of the Trinity River. Several small, unnamed tributaries provide local drainage to the project. There is currently no major storm drainage system within the project area. Small, generally inadequate, cross drainage culverts are located at several locations along Continental Boulevard and other perimeter streets. A drainage area map for the project is included as Exhibit B-2. Major watersheds and approximate drainage areas are shown on the map. 2-02 DRAINAGE CRITERIA All streets and storm drainage systems will be designed in accordance with the drainage design criteria in effect at the time of final design of each phase of the project. It is anticipated that street rights -of -way and storm sewer systems working in combination will be designed to safely contain the storm runoff resulting from the 100-year storm. All cross drainage culverts under streets will be designed to carry the 100-year discharge. All drainage facilities will be designed to have no significant impact on land owners adjacent to the proposed project. A detailed drainage study will be provided to the City prior to commencing construction of each phase of the project. B-4 643 • ((r, cr �- - — '••_ , _�, � SO�ITIIIAKE BLVD� fl•79) — _ •- ti� c'h\ -� A. . t m' `� •� _ _ . • _ _ _ O m� I DRAINAGE ' V h DMbE .1 ! + /i NAL BLVD. '• Iy c ` '•.Y. :r - 1 � ►DA.-0.43 S.M. _ -'� • D.A.= VS S.M` 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN I! II II /lo 11 li RiQAD 6o IL B-s 4-0 76 ' Op SM c �' 593 T • ° •. DRAINAGE AREA MAP DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION EXHIBIT B-2 2-03 RECLAMATION COW Approximately 90 acres of the project lie within the 100-year flood plain of Big Bear Creek as defined by the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the City of Southlake prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Approximately 46 acres of the flood plain is designated as floodway fringe and can be reclaimed and developed. It is planned that most of the floodway fringe will be reclaimed during the development of this project. The 100-year flood plain and floodway fringe is shown on Exhibit B-3. All reclaimed areas will be filled to an elevation a minimum of two feet above the 100-year flood level based on fully developed conditions within the Big Bear Creek watershed. A detailed hydrologic and hydraulic study of Big Bear Creek will be performed and submitted to the City for approval prior to commencing reclamation activities. M 4-65 tl • • t.: r SOVT}iAKE�LVO (F fl 91` 030 — ° �° el • •� �� ��t.—� � _-•�_-ate—�! :sue, � - ate. _- •-�"�- • h 1709, Whits ,,(hapeI IF • _.� A.irstrp '` - Cam- .i-`._ :•_..1.-.•• �. ,a._ f---- m ' � ci' •' • • m . � m z artoll d;' • v -_ / union B-7 FLOODWAY FRINGE FLOODPLAIN AND FLOODWAY DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORPORATION EXHIBIT B-3 sj� III. WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES L _ 3-01 EXISTING WATERLINES The City of Southlake operates existing waterlines along most perimeter streets of the proposed development and along Continental Blvd. These lines range in size from 6-inch to 12-inch. A 20-inch water supply feed is located at the corner of FM 1709 and White Chapel Road. 3-02 PROPOSED WATERLINE SYSTEM The water master plan for the City of Southlake calls for a network of 12- and 8-inch lines through the proposed project and along the perimeter. Where specifically needed to serve the project, these lines will be installed by Bear Creek Communities, Inc. as each phase is developed. Additional 6- and 8-inch lines will be installed throughout the residential development. All waterline design and construction will meet City standards. 3-03 EXISTING SANITARY SEWERS There is currently no sewer available to Southlake customers in the immediate area of the project. However; -.the City of Colleyville owns and operates an existing twelve -inch sanitary sewer line along Big Bear Creek. An agreement currently exists with the City of Colleyville to serve 400 units within proposed project. Negotiations are underway to turn :the line over to the Trinity River Authority (TRA), thereby opening capacity to potential sewer customers throughout Southlake. B-8 &47 3-04 FUTURE BIG BEAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR - The Trinity River Authority has contracted with Southlake, Colleyville, Keller, and Fort Worth to extend a new sanitary sewer interceptor line along Big Bear Creek to near IH-35W. This line ranges in size from 48-inch to 36-inch diameter through the proposed development. Design is complete and right-of-way acquisition is underway. Construction should be complete in 1990. This new line will provide the proposed development adequate sewer capacity for full development. 3-05 PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM The wastewater master plan for the City of Southlake recognizes the TRA Big Bear Creek sewer project. The master plan calls for lateral sewer lines ranging in size from 6-inch to 15-inch diameter routed through the natural low areas and drainage ways north of the creek. Bear Creek Communities, Inc. will install a system of laterals similar in configuration to the master plan. These laterals will be sized to accommodate offsite drainage areas as required. Additional 6-inch and 8-inch sewer lines will be installed throughout the residential areas. All sewer line design and construction will meet City standards. B-9 G-42 IV. THOROUGHFARES 4-01 EXISTING THOROUGHFARES The proposed development is bounded on the east by Carroll Avenue and Brumlow Avenue, the west by White Chapel Road and the north by FM 1709 (Southlake Blvd.). Continental Blvd. bisects the project in an east -west direction. All of the City maintained streets are two-lane, rural asphalt sections. FM 1709 is a state facility. 4-02 CITY THOROUGHFARE MASTER PLAN The Southlake thoroughfare master plan has designated existing White Chapel Road, Carroll Avenue, Brumlow Avenue, and Continental Blvd. as major thoroughfares requiring four lanes of divided paving within an 84-foot right-of-way. Two future undesignated collectors running east and west bisect the portions of the project north and south of Continental Blvd. A future north -south collector connects FM 1709 to the southern collector located south and parallel to Continental Blvd. FM 1709 is a State facility and will be improved to a six -lane divided roadway by the State. 4-03 PROPOSED THOROUGHFARES The proposed project will utilize the existing perimeter thoroughfares; White Chapel Road, Carroll Avenue, Brumlow Avenue and FM 1709. B-10 Continental Blvd. will be the major east -west thoroughfare through the project. It will be improved to a four -lane divided facility in phases concurrently with the phased development of the project. A north -south internal access road will be constructed through the project from FM 1709 to Continental Blvd. The undesignated east -west thoroughfare south of Continental included in the City master plan will not be required since the area south of Continental will be residential and can be adequately served by minor collector streets. This thoroughfare was not planned by the City to extend west of White Chapel Road or east of Brumlow Avenue, hence, its elimination will not affect adjacent land owners. The City's planned east -west thoroughfare north of Continental Blvd. also does not appear to be needed since the proposed development along the route will be primarily residential. Traffic from these areas can be handled by internal residential streets. The existing east -west thoroughfares, Continental Blvd. and FM 1709, will provide adequate traffic capacity in the southern portion of Southlake. Elimination of these two thoroughfares will allow development of the project as a residential community without numerous major thoroughfares. An unneeded network of major roads would tend to segment the project into several, small unconnected developments, instead of maintaining the concept of a large master -planned community. kn:03087PD B-11 4-70 City of Southlake, Texas ZONING CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-02 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE of REVIEW: 03/25/91 PROJECT NAME: Zoning Concept Plan - Timarron, Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 03/12/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities 300 E. Carpenter Frwv_. Ste. 1425 Irving, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Ste. 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. The existing 'C-1' zoning at the southwest corner of White Chapel and Continental should be shown. * During the previous review of the Zoning Concept Plan, it was determined that thoroughfare related issues would be better addressed at the Development Site Plan level of review. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bear Creek Communities Carter and Burgess oI CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-01-A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF W SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A TOTAL OF 75.87 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, TRACTS 2A3, 2C1A, 6A, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6F1, 8B, 8C, AND A PORTION OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF SPRING CREEK ACRES, THE J.N. GIBSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 591, TRACT 1B2, AND THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1038, TRACTS 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D3A, 2D4, 2D5, 2D6, 2G, 2H, 2J, AND 2J1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY 1 DISTRICTS TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agricultural and Single Family 1 Districts under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-01-A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A TOTAL OF 75.87 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, TRACTS 2A3, 2C1A, 6A, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6F1, 8B, 8C, AND A PORTION OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF SPRING CREEK ACRES, THE J.N. GIBSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 591, TRACT 1B2, AND THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1038, TRACTS 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D3A, 2D4, 2D5, 2D6, 2G, 2H, 2J, AND 2J1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY 1 DISTRICTS TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as Agriclutural and Single Family 1 Districts under the City•s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these w- 73 Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being" approximately 75.87 acres of land out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 2A3, 2C1A, 6A, 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 6F1, 8B, 8C, and a portion of lots 2 & 3 of Spring Creek Acres, the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, Tract 1B2, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D3A, 2D41 2D5, 2D6, 2G, 2H, 2J, AND 2J1 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein. From Agricultural and Single Family 1 Districts to Planned Unit Development District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, *Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. N Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the -3- changes should be granted or denied: .safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of -signs to `traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, .sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: -2- on/c"- %5,- I zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same 'shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. iW Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of ---this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00). A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1991. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -4- 4 r / {o" City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-03 Development Site Plan ZA 91-03 is the Development Site Plan for Phases 1 and 2, Timarron (formerly known as Creekside). Phase I and 2 are described as 165.1 acres out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Surveys, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. The owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Timarron Phases 1 and 2 are located East of South White Chapel Blvd., both North and South of East Continental Blvd. Phase 1 proposes 158 residential units and 18.1 acres of open space. Phase 2 proposes 76 residential units and 10.1 acres of open space. The developer plans to build a swim/tennis club on 11.9 acres. Attached is a lot size summary provided by Carter and Burgess for Phases 1 and 2 of Timarron. It addresses four categories of lots and provides a breakdown of the number of lots, percent of total lots and the average lot size per category. There were eighty-two (82) notices sent to property owners surrounding the entire residential P.U.D. development. Of the thirteen (13) property owners within 200 feet, two (2) owners have responded regarding the development site plan. Sam Burnitt, 921 S. White Chapel Blvd., spoke at P & Z and voiced his concerns about his liability with an existing pond on his property and the proposed development. Roger Feenstra, 200 E. Continental Blvd., also spoke at P & Z and voiced his concerns regarding the density and the needed improvements to East Continental Blvd. On March 7, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-2) of the Development Site Plan with the February 22, 1991 Staff Review deleting item #7 and informational comment #3. The entrance street on the north side of E. Continental Blvd. will be increased to a 60-foot R.O.W. to..the "loop" street with a 41-ft. pavement width. They further recommended changing the minimum side yard width to allow 5-foot side yards for only 25% of the lots and that there be a minimum of 20 feet between houses where the exception exists. i City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager March 22, 1991 Page Two Listed below is a comparison of the existing SF-20A regulations and the amended regulations as proposed for the Timarron P.U.D.: Height: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard Adj. to Street Rear Yard: SF-20A 2 1/2 stories Max. 35' 35' 15' 30' 40' (35' cul-de-sac) P.U.D. 2 1/2 stories Max. 35" 25' Min. with 50% lots at 35' 5' 20' 20' Lot Width: 100' 85' (90% lots) 50'-85' (10% lots) Lot Depth: 125' 110' Lot Size: 20,000 sq. ft. 12,000 sq. ft. Max. Lot Coverage: 20% 30% Floor Area: 1,800 sq. ft. 2,400 sq. ft. Residential Density: 2.18 d.u./acre 250 units 1.5 d.u./acre Open Space/Park Area: Not less than 10 % of gross area On March 12, 1991, I received a letter from Larry Midtbo, Bear Creek Communities, Inc., requesting that this case be tabled and rescheduled for the April 2, 1991 City Council meeting. On March 19, 1991, the City Council approved (5-0) the applicant's request to continue this item until April 2, 1991. lye 1-z, KPG C ITY OF SOI lTM.Ai E APPLICATION FOR AM ODMIENT TO ZC NING MAP Application No. ZA 11-0 3 To -be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. ADDRESS: c/o Larry Midtbo 300 E. Carpenter Frwy., Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 DESCRIPTION (11ETES ACID BOU? ) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE REZONED: See attachments ZON LNG RDQL=: FROM: P.U.D. Concept Plan TO: Development Site Plan This application =st be acccmpanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 2001 of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. February 11, 1991 DATE SIG4AUJRE OF PERSM FILING 3ST BE OVER OF--T1fE PROPERTY Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared L /- K(Z y I \ f C\ T 13 O known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the sarre for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 19 V / ;NARY PUBLIC Iti ND FOR TE -XS My Carmission expires the � S day of MAR— 1— 9 1 F R I 1 1: 4 2 CARTER e. BURGESS P . 02 TIMARRON PHASE 1 AND 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT SIZE SUMMARY MARCH 1, 1991 The following four categories of lots illustrate the lot mix and average lot si7.es in the initial two phases of the Timarron Development: CATEGORY NO, OF LOTS % OF TOTAL AVG� LOT SIZE L 12,5 - 16,800 S.F. 5o 21% 14,029 S.F. I1. 16,801 - 21,780 S.F. 118 50% 18,246 S.F. (1/2 acre) III. 21,781 - 30,000 S.F. 39 17% 24,783 S.F. IV. 30,001 S.F. > 27 12% 38.409 S.F. TOTAL 234 Lots 100% 20,761, S.F. 7-4 City of Southlake, Texas DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-03 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE of REVIEW: 02/22/91 PROJECT NAME: Development Site Plan - Timarron, Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 02/11/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Ste. 1425 Irving, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Ste. 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The boundary dimensions should be shown. 2. All adjacent tracts should be shown and labeled with existing zoning. 3. All adjacent R.O.W. should be shown. Also show existing sanitary sewer easement along Bear Creek. 4. Label the existing and proposed zoning classifications of the site. 5. All bufferyards should be labeled with width and type of bufferyard. 6. Are sidewalks intended throughout the development? If so, these could be shown schematically. 7. Show the location type and height of all walls, fences and screening devices. 8. Provide an anticipated schedule of development. 9. Provide the consultant's name on the plan. 10. Show the size of the points of ingress/egress to the site. 11. Show any intentions for signs or lighting or note the lack thereof. 12. The thoroughfare plan shows a proposed 64' R.O.W. collector roughly bisecting the portion of the development south of Continental and a 50' R.O.W. roughly along the west side of the portiop north of Continental. * These thoroughfares were not required on the previously approved Concept Plan. q'C City of Southlake, Texas 13. During the previous Concept Plan approval, it was determined that descriptive landscape intentions would be addressed with each phase of the development. These intentions should be provided. * The 5-acre tract owned by Bear Creek at the Southeast corner of White Chapel and Continental should be considered during the review of this Development Site Plan. The approval of this plan may reduce the viability of this tract as residential development as depicted on the Land Use Plan. The following comments are not required in Section 30.8 and 40.3A, relating to Development Site Plans, however, we have provided the following suggestions for the Commission/Council to consider in their review of this project. *1. We recommend the adjacent tracts be labeled with the owner's name and Land Use Map designation. *2. The subdivision ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01-D does not allow access control strips as shown near lots 24-27 of Block 1. This out -tract should be provided public R.O.W. access either adjacent to the tract or stubbed to the tract. *3. There are 80 residential lots north of Continental which access from a single point of entry. Ordinance 483, Section 5.03-K-1 requires street stubs at 1,000' spacings. We would recommend a stub to the east or west from the northern most loop. *4. We recommend the applicant provide a summary of Use Regulations and Development Regulations. Development Regulations should highlight the variances from the requirements of SF20 zoning. This should include the following at a minimum: - Height of structures - Front yard setbacks: Percentage or number at various setbacks. - Rear and side yard setback minimums. - Minimum side setbacks next to streets. - Lot widths: Minimum and average lot widths at the setback line. - Lot depth: Minimum and average. - Lot size: Minimum and average. Also, approximately how many lots are in various size ranges, i.e. 10-12,000; 12-14,000; etc. - Maximum lot coverage. - Floor area minimums. - Residential density and total dwelling units. - Area of open space as a percentage by phase. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 11, 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bear Creek Communities Carter & Burgess 7-G jyMMARY A - 234 Mddr • - P Me Opel C - Su1wITbYIY CIW 1LS ACIN TOTAL 144.8 Awes PROJECT OPEN SPACE .2 AIL PROJECT OPEN SPACE Me AL LPROJECT OPEN SPACE TIMARRONDEWELDMIEW ONE �&&H N "An CREEL( COWAnn s, ME' S-„-S, r- =N' 1-1 FRANK WELCH & ASSOCIATES • INC IN March 20, 1991 Karen P. Gandy City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Mobil Phase I Amenity Buildings Dear Karen: Please find enclosed reductions of the amenity buildings for Mobil Southlake. I hope these will be useful to create the transparencies that you will present to the City Council. Please contact me as soon as you get a ruling on the exterior cladding for these buildings. Please feel free to call if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Jon Pankratz AIA FRANK WELCH & ASSOCIATES INC. /mm 70(!, Kinney Avenue Suite 416 Dallas Texas 75202 214/954-0072 S 0 s m k 7-10 ml a ►e IL Sig 1 T \ I / I \ / 1 // / A c I c► -F �� / / \ 1 i / ---�1 WN � \ 1 1 S Y C3 y I 0 0 u m Mi Z p 0 0 ,U*6-1 . .. . ?_ !Z Floor Plan COMMUNITY 7-13 Ims ho IIl City of Southlake, Texas DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-03 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE of REVIEW: 03/26/91 PROJECT NAME: Development Site Plan - Timarron, Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Ste. 1425 Irving, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 03/11/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Ste. 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Show the location type and height of all walls, fences and screening devices. 2. During the previous Concept Plan approval, it was determined that descriptive landscape intentions would be addressed with each phase of the development. These intentions should be provided. * The Council may wish to discuss the potential for continuation of the Bear Creek Linear Park through this development. * The thoroughfare plan shows a proposed 64' R.O.W. collector roughly bisecting the portion of the development south of Continental and a 50' R.O.W. roughly along the west side of the portion north of Continental. These thoroughfares were not required on the previously approved Concept Plan. * The single family development adjacent to the proposed 8-acre commercial tract may change in configuration pending decisions related to the proposed zoning for this corner tract. (i.e. approval/disapproval, size, shape, etc.) The following comments are not required in Section 30.8 and 40.3A, relating to Development Site Plans, however, we have provided the following suggestions for the Commission/Council to consider in their review of this project. *1. There are 80 residential lots north of Continental which access from a single point of entry. Ordinance 483, Section 5.03-K-1 requires street stubs at 1,000' spacings. We would recommend a stub to the east or west from the northern most loop. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bear Creek Communities Carter & Burgess 7 - /5 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-04 Preliminary Plat ZA 91-04 is the Preliminary Plat of Timarron, Phase 1 and 2, 165.1 acres out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Surveys, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. This plat includes 234 residential lots with 28.2 acres of open space. These phases are located East of South White Chapel Blvd. on both the north and south sides of East Continental Blvd. The owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. There were eighty-two (82) notices sent to property owners surrounding the entire residential P.U.D. development. Of the thirteen (13) owners within 200 feet, there have been no responses received regarding the preliminary plat. On March 7, 1991, the Planning and Zoning recommended approval (5-0-1) subject to the Staff Review dated February 22, 1991 with the exception of items #6 (perpendicular lot lines) and #16 (islands in street "L") and requiring that the developer increase the entrance to the area north of E. Continental Blvd. to a 60-foot R.O.W. with a 41-ft. pavement width. On March 12,1991, I received a letter from Larry Midtbo, Bear Creek Communities, Inc., requesting that this case be tabled and rescheduled for the April 2, 1991, City Council meeting. On March 19, 1991, the City Council approved (5-0) the applicant's request to continue this item until April 2, 1991. On March 21, 1991, Larry Midtbo submitted a letter requesting that the Preliminary Plat be tabled until April 16, 1991. This will be concurrent with the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 480-01, the amended P.U.D. zoning request. KPG �-1 (W Mar 21,91 16:26 HIGHLAND SHORES Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Ms. Karen Candy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 March 21, 1991 Timarron 300 L CAnMWZn "WkwAY 6WTE 14?b I iM. TCXAS 73W UIF.PNONF (7/4) 791•3'.p FAX R14) 341-WW (W Dear Ms. Gandy: Please schedule Bear Creek Communities' request for preliminary plat approval (ZA 91-04) for the April 16,'1991 City Council Meeting. The PD amendment (ZA 91-02) and Development Site Plan (ZA 91-03) should continue Lo be on rlie April 2, 1991 agenda. Please call if you have any questions. L (� Sincerely. Larry T. Midtbo President " o Mobil company Y-L P.02 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-05 Preliminary Plat ZA 91-05 is the Preliminary Plat of Block 7, Lots 1 and 2, SouthView Addition, 4.937 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being a portion of Tracts 5 and 5A. The property is located on North Carroll Avenue across from Southlake City Hall. The owner of the property is T.J. McHale. The applicant is the United States Postal Service. The current zoning is Office-1. There will be two lots in this preliminary plat with Lot 1 being the proposed Post Office site. There were two (2) letters sent to property owners within 200 feet. To date, there have been no written responses or inquiries. On March 21, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of the Preliminary Plat subject to the Plat Review letter dated 3/12/91. KPG i-I P. Plat TITLE OF SITH -R . (WMIVISIX ZA 91-OS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/06/90 �1 APPLICATION Prcl. Plat Lots I -Z BIock `] South V'Icw Phase I SITE PLAN IS IN: APPLICANT NAME: V,v�7Fi� SThiE3 �S-rAL StFRv)CL ADDRESS: %BOO N. STE MMaNS PHCNE: �/9 - 7�v OWNM (if different) TT T_ Mc /{i4 CL E r uY Ja el 43 %f 1 6:tf & 4e-aw Ae. # c 7:)A IIA 5, 77. 77S^2-3 Q aiS/- 369- G%9/ I hereby certify that this site plan is in conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed requeunresolved issues. 7_�c9 Date: /- 1 - 5, Signed: 40WN&(Z� For City Use ly: - n t� I hereby acknowledge receipt o e e plan application and the application fee in the amount of $ NO on this the ,�3 - day of 19 Signed: Title:(4� following checklist is a partial summary of site plan requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this site plan submittal. Shown Not RESIDENTIAL DEVEIAPMENT SITE PLAN On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 20', 1"= 40', or as approved North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Location Map Appropriate title, i.e. "Site Plan" to include name of development, City, gross acreage and date of preparation Name and address of record owner Name, address -and phone of person preparing the site plan Metes and bounds labeled on property boundary Existing zoning of this site and all adjacent property Any proposed zoning shown All R.O.W. and easements on or adjacent to the site labeled (type, width) Width and type of bufferyards labeled Pedestrian walks, malls, and open areas shown Location, type and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices shown _ A-iticipated schedule of development Location and size of points of ingress/egress to the site _ Iocation, size, height, type and orientation of signs, lighting, luminaries and exterior auditory speakers All trash dumpsters located (Multi -family only) Any necessary drainage study or details p — L q Y' F�.•j. It d .. I ANON LOW TROPHY CLUB LAN G Ip JErEi u yd: ' - I ream I" sm w x aEp IN Za CNN sr _" _Ll:r ON 'OUNTY - - — — =— I T" IAIE To 4RRANT COUNTY a� TV LAKE ■ ' -� ` 1.a DISTRICT BOUND - � " SOLANA 9 KIM -` 1 1� I ONEiCENT p R■ " 1 1 W NAIINYN N " c' t 114 I/N LIOF ■ IW WLTNFN Ai,4 pI _ -::.i �. piL 1 Ort ' YE � �''1 — ■MYLE n -- W TAYLON IT 1 12 E CT _E :cc 1• Mir — pwn ■ 1` :" HION SCHOOL C I I CNNNNA 2 mom" 1 B!wTTA Q ♦` `� a W[rrt 111■ i mu FNNIwYE LN - I �.'�------_'--- I 3NALANLN!�ii—CYM{�.IIWfii ;THP LWA~A[E�lGry �It TATNMN a ilNa 1 uNa4J REF" NILLO e�N n x TOrRE■IN C I ■•t $� A1tCLN 1 iNNOPN To ■ a fex 1 - [ 0. JOHNSON 11 iululuE CT' r J ELEMENTARY N N NIa T Ulm N CANYON C d— N * `� ►� . : FAYRIEf ■ KM "'Coll OII,TOO --------- ION fx `'FI Uig J MIDDLE rF MRl ;y ♦Aw �I rsd wna■Np SCHOOL - ! 1�A DIM SCHOOL FLOAENCE � NO � JjrFAp■ ♦ � sl1 µArO w LAX � YEii � �a11fFM IIONia orf== � OILE t �:IIOIIIYCIINLtS' y N.x LF:N■XNNNHALL ANNn COYF Imo Y CT " 114 � LN`� i rLLHOfCA it LOOSE s t t p IIINYENWEq - LT CMitlr n �J ■ r` 21C/LURIUN " wNE ■ ' 110ENTENWALPARIS tNi MW. NUTN111NE IlY �� 114 -1T■ 17■ Z•a \ ``♦ t OAN RI • � s 'fie GOOOE FI plot CT. E 4 o ALIM IRIORT NAINIOW _ l0 f{fF3 IIST Y rIC EL I ■WNO F`� ` /• �, _ - i� iif • • I s CONT� KTAi) • • t N ly CNTININTA III .• +,lye e / •• �WENTARY ;� IF T� ♦ i N d. u •• J1rifgl. ■ a, a`ins COLLEYVILLE 15 L 9-3 J TA 34. 20 3.273 N O N O Z O Q 0 MMMAKE MY MM i TR 3C 3.0 AC ZONED: CS � ) o ( P TO FFCfiM GAO« ZONED: C-3 TR 3 72.95 AC TR 3C 3.0 AC / q-q City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-05 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 03/12/91 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - SouthView Addition, Lots 1 & 2, Block 7 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 02/25/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: T.J. McHale Mizell Land Surveying, Inc. 10143 High Hollow Dr., #203 513 North Highway 1187 Dallas, Texas 75230 Aledo, Texas 76008 Phone: Phone: (817) 441-6199 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. On the surrounding SouthView plats, change the word "Preliminary" to "Final" plat approved. 2. Add a 15' drainage and utility easement along the rear of Lot 2. * The width of the drainage easement may change pending revisions to the preliminary plans. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 25 , 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: MizellLandSurveying Levitt Engineering Cheatham & Associates q-5 Im sws��Kn,oi -- I CAN o i I Jqk Z !In Q� ^ 3 � V I .FYOp • 99drr d�.fr/• t `+a 1. ns-iTo+Tr b �� .71 N '.k� r.Al I&! v City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-05 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 03/25/91 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - SouthView Addition, Lots 1 & 2, Block 7 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: T.J. McHale 10143 High Hollow Dr., #203 Dallas, Texas 75230 Phone: Fax: 03/25/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: Mizell Land Surveying, Inc. 513 North Highway 1187 Aledo, Texas 76008 Phone: (817) 441-6199 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED' FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. * The width and alignment of the drainage easement crossing the property may change pending revisions to the preliminary plans. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mizell4Land Surveying Levitt Engineering Cheatham & Associates q--1 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-06 Final Plat ZA 91-06 is the Final Plat of Block 7, Lot 1, SouthView Addition, being 1.002 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. The property is located at the corner of Southcrest Lane and North Carroll Avenue across from Southlake City Hall. The owner of the property is T.J. McHale; the applicant is the United States Postal Service. This one -lot plat is the proposed location of the new Southlake Post Office. There were no additional notices required to be sent. On March 21, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of the Final Plat subject to the Plat Review letter dated 3/12/91. op- KPG Informational Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the U.S. Postal Service must obtain a Special Exception Use permit for a postal facility in the 0-1 district. CITY OF SO(TTHLAI E FINIALS I PLAT APPLICATICN TITLE OF PLAT: Lot I) block 'i) 'Skink View) Nasei Cn*1ITTAL DEAD=: 22 5 9 9i-06 APPf .TC'ANT 2/07/90 TOTAL LOTS: TOTAL ACRES: OWNER (if different) NAME: Vu i TED STRTES PCISTAL S6 XVI C.E' ADDRESS: 7 L oo Al. STEMM A, 5 gwj ll�s 7. 7S-.;t6 6 - 7/11 PHCNE : r. T .. Me-fl.A« ET vx % S`o3 /�iGN ffol/aw �R. # 03 7D A AAS TJ . 7 S-,i3o I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Crdinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed -request and address any i nrWlyedl}.§pues,, Signed:tOwNrK Date: /- L - s• For City Use Only: �,, � I hereby acknoledge eipt o't�he� pY�linunary plat applica 'nand the application fee in the amount of $ S/Q, on this the ,5'� day of19iL. Signed: IG 111ry Title: following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION Ctin Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: l" = 50', 1" = 100' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Surveyor Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, ''street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shown and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersE -jo-z hown with street names A4 14 21 TR : 34 . 15 Ac. I—/ .11, .�l I . U TR 3C 3.0 AC j 10-3 20 3.273 • S�► y�q 4 j TR 1A JfQ 9. ACAC (e.S3 ACS (1.0 AM N O O Z O ¢ O 90 =An crry HAIL, U TR 3C 3.0 AC ZOM: CS cl 1P�, 0 1 P su A MM FD(HM GROUP ZONED: C-3 M TR 3 72.95 AC City of Southlake, Texas — PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-06 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 03/12/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - SouthView Addition, Lot 1, Block 7 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 02/25/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: T.J. McHale 10143 High Hollow Dr., #203 Dallas, Texas 75230 Phone• Fax: ENG/SURVEYOR: Mizell Land Surveying, Inc. 513 North Highway 1187 Aledo, Texas 76008 Phone: (817) 441-6199 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Change the word "Preliminary" on the addition to the west to say "Final" plat approved. 2. Please confirm that the R.O.W. dedication is 84' from the Final platted R.O.W. for the City Hall plat and that it aligns with the Lakewood Acres dedications (i.e. the R.O.W. dedication may not be an even 171.) * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, Parkland dedication requirements, off -site sewer extensions, waterline improvements and off -site grade -to -drain permission. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 25 , 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mizell Land Surveying Levitt Engineering Cheatham & Associates 10•4 C 1H 0 c N -30" "'v o loin me. 0 0. 1" 0 0 a.. X 00 K:-- or 0.4 '94 99C7 6F' 00 .4 e- /&.,e The owners of all corner lots shall maintain might triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. T. J. McHale City of Southlal 10403 High Ballow Dr., #203 667 No. Carroll Dallas, Texas 75230 Bouthlake, Texaf Volume 4689, Page 279, DRTCT Volume 4379, PaS Zoned 0-1 II Zoned C-3 Zc:,/ :z S) I A- I I I pr A��D� 40, Qi 8 tt. .............. ...... -ql (D 1�j N �21 5--7- )A T. J. McNale ey 10403 High Hallow Dr., #203 Dallas, Texas 75230 Volume 4689, Page 279, DRTCT Zoned 0-1 �- 10 61; ,cly,94 at-Rr ar 'Wr /' 'el-loele 7 _7404YAUZZY AMMMI 10-5 me u 16 0, -,-:. - City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-06 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 03/25/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - SouthView Addition, Lot 1, Block 7 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: T.J. McHale 10143 High Hollow Dr., #203 Dallas, Texas 75230 Phone: Fax: 03/25/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: Mizell Land Surveying, Inca 513 North Highway 1187 Aledo, Texas 76008 Phone: (817) 441-6199 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-55811 EXT. 744. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, Parkland dedication requirements, off -site sewer extensions, waterline improvements and off -site grade -to -drain permission. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mizell Land Surveying Levitt Engineering Cheatham & Associates I a-6 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-07 Revised Preliminary Plat ZA 91-07 is the Revised Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes. This plat encompasses 148.426 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and the L.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. The owner of the property is Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P.-II. This proposed revision is a portion of the previously approved 267-acre preliminary plat and shows future Phases IV - VII. One hundred -thirty-four (134) lots will be affected by this revision. SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will be realigned to a sixty -foot (60') R.O.W. with curves of 400-foot radius. There were thirty-four (34) property owners within notified of this proposed revision. To date, there three (3) written responses in opposition, none in Joann Ingle, 680 N. Peytonville Avenue Greg Jones, 1365 Cross Timber Drive Alex Mericas, 1345 Ten Bar Ct. 200 feet have been favor: All of the above respondents were opposed to the narrowing SouthRidge Parkway from their original proposal of four I lanes. They further expressed concerns regarding the safety of North Peytonville Ave. and the lack of funding available for its improvement. Several people spoke during the P & Z public hearing: * Fred Joyce, 455 Randol Mill, spoke for Leroy McCain and himself. He was concerned about no street access to SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. He said that he and Arvida had discussed stubbing Travis Ct. to his property in exchange for approximately seventy feet (70') of property in the northern portion of the project. * Cora Lee Brown, 1355 Cross Timber Dr., stated that if the City approved the developer's request to change his original submittal that the City was setting a dangerous precedent with future developers. * Doug Brister, RR 2, Box 326, Boyd, Tx., represented the Sullivan family on N. Peytonville. He expressed concerns about the increased radius on N. Peytonville Ave. and the effect it will have on the Sullivan properties, especially the existing home on the curve. City of Southlake, Texas * Richard L. Brown, 1355 Cross Timber Dr., opposed due to the extra cost to the citizens to finance the N. Peytonville improvements due to failure of the bond issue. * Tom O'Malley, 202 SouthRidge Lakes Parkway, stated that most residents were unaware of the major thoroughfare proposed in their subdivision. He recognizes the impact the school had on the proposed road system in the area. * Chuck Ross, 1359 Cross Timber Dr., emphasized the need to construct both roads in question as the areas to the North develop. * Debbie Farrier, 1336 Glen Cove, expressed concern for the Sullivans and the effect the increased R.O.W. on N. Peytonville Ave. will have on their front yards. She stated that the City compromised with Arvida by allowing "only one way in and one way out" as they requested instead of the proposed East-West thoroughfare as indicated on the Master P1an.In exchange, Arvida was to provide an eighty-four foot (841) roadway to handle significant traffic North and South. One telephone call was received from Les Clow, 820 Shady Oaks Dr. He requested that the developer place a screening fence on their common property line so that the residents will not be bothered by his livestock. On March 21, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-1) of the Revised Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes subject to the Plat Review letter dated 3/13/91 with the exception of items #10 and #14 and adding that Arvida will provide a stubout to the Joyce property per the arrangements discussed previously. Furthermore, the developer must provide a thirty-seven foot (37') roadway (back-to-back) through their development, must honor their commitment of $100,000 to improve N. Peytonville Ave. to twenty-four foot (24') pavement width as discussed, and they instructed City Staff to provide exhibits showing existing structures being affected by the proposed R.O.W. change along N. Peytonville Ave. before the case comes before the City Council. KPG Informational Note: If you wish to see a 37-foot street "on the ground", you may go to Ravenaux Dr. in Ravenaux Village, West of North White Chapel Blvd. %_Liz Ur __*_v1rLLd% Z c/ u if yu FINAL PLAT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: TOTAL IOTS : 30 TOTAL ACiW : APPLICANT OWNER (if different) At: k4l��.1 ADDRESS: � , 3 ID/}441 l'/rX�f(f�/✓ar • PHCNE: 2�4�- gbo- 5;0- I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to. be present at the applicable Planning and ZolMig �sian and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed -request and address ar* pirved issues. Signed: Date: a-02�_�'� For City Use,Only: I herebY acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , lg . Signed: Title: The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the C' , of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and N217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATICN On Plan Applic. Acceptable scale: 1" = 50', 1" = 100' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicuuty Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Final Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner & subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Surveyor �- Standard approval block provided Proper format for owner's dedication and notary (Appendix) Proper surveying certification statement (Appendix) Courthouse filing record note provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200' ) Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. L sate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines All survey lines shown and labeled Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property ,i Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) _G Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersection- chi with street names 11-3 Final Plat Pg. 2 of 3 Shen Not GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 2/07, On Plan Applic. _ .�' Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, total acreage. Property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes shover. Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description / Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. All property corners dimensioned to centerline of adjacent streets All existing easements shown (Type & Size) r- Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) (Replats Only; PROPOSED INFOWATIM _G Utility easements: Mere adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' D.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance rerniirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned and centerline dimensioned with bearings _G All curve data labeled (delta, radius, length, tangent) _G Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) Street -names provided not similar to any existing street names r- R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order �— Square feet of each lot shown (Chart format O.K. ) Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned _L Front building setback lines labeled or noted 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) ./ Parcels -reserved for private use shown as described above _L Calculated dimensions for all lots, street R.O.W. and centerline, easements, etc. / Flood plain limit shown. Floodway shown and labeled with dimensional ti= Avigation easement shown if applicable (Appendix) Minimum finish floor elevations (No. 483-3.03-D-30) Note also provided (Appendix) .l Deed Restriction Statement (No. 483-3.05-C) (Amended Plat Only) .� Flowage easement note (Appendix 5) Sight triangle note (No. 483-8.02) Driveway access limitation note.(No. 483-5.01-H) �- Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) Not Included Included rye 2/07/90 OTHER RE wnw S(J UTI'AIS - Catplete and corrected water and sewer layout Complete and corrected Preliminary drainage study by professional Civil Engineer Provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinanoes No. 483 (3!03-D~35) and No. 482 Perc tests for each lot°not served by City sewer Certificate of taxes Paid fran City Tax Collector Certificate of taxes paid fran County Tax Collector �- Certificate of taxed paid from School Tax Collector Any Proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions Any Proposed Homeowners Agreements and/or dowaents -- Developers Agreement (Prior to Constructicn) L L W C �� \ 'R9: ® i J CO a W = _1$ o 14 2 Z J ° < I. A of m Q - 3 0 DY Q _m _ Q 1LI W Y f- of 6 i Z Z � J a Q F CL i I PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-07 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 03/13/91 PROJECT NAME: Revised Prelimin Southridge Lakes DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P.-II 15303 Dallas Parkway Suite 590 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: Fax: to 'B') - 02/27/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: John E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Our base map records show additional tracts within 20011 of this property. Please show these tracts and label with appropriate owners if different from those shown on the plat. 2. The exiting zoning needs to be labeled on a few adjacent tracts. 3. Show all existing easements adjacent to the property. 4. Label Peytonville Avenue along the north property line. 5. Show the west and north property lines in Peytonville. The distances on the northermost tract do not scale correctly. 6. We feel the entire corner west of the future 64' R.O.W. for Peytonville near Lot 39, Block 3 should be dedicated as R.O.W. because this is currently being used as R.O.W. 7. Label all pond areas as drainage and utility easements. 8. Please show the R.O.W. dedication for Peytonville to be a tangent curve and not a compound curve in the vicinity of Phase VI. 9. Show the proposed R.O.W. width and pavement width on the extension of Southridge Parkway. 10. Although not required by the Council in their previous approval, staff recommends additional street connections to Shady Oaks and Peytonville to aid in emergency access. 111 City of Southlake. Texas 11. The Preliminary Water, Sewer and Drainage Plans show the need for the following changes: - Add 15' D + U.E. between Lots 132 and 133, Block 1. - Add 15' U.E. between Lots 33 and 34, 44 and 45, Block 4. - Add 15' D + U.E. between Lots 127 and 128, Block 1 to connect south to Brazos. - - Add 15' D + U.E. between Lots 74 and 75, Block 2. - All easements containing water or sewer or drainage improvements should be a minimum of 15' in width. Make this • change on the following lots: 78 and 79, Block 2;---* 111 and 112, Block 1; 37 and 38, Block 2; 39 and 40, Block 3; 31 and 32, Block 4; 113 and 114, Block 3; 37 and 38, Block-2; 54 and 55, Block 2. - All easements containing two or more types of improvements should be a minimum of 20' in width. Make this change on the following lots: 48 and 49, Block 4; 101 and 102, Block 3; 81 and 82, Block 1. * Staff has not been informed by Mr. Joyce as to whether or not he wants a street stubbed to his tract. 12. No utility easements to serve the interior lots have been shown. Provide all appropriate easements depending on the intentions to provide electric from the front or rear of the lots. 13. Please label existing apparent R.O.W. on Shady Oaks, show dimensions from center of this R.O.W. to existing property corners. Is the 28' dimension from center of pavement? 14. Section 8.01-G requires 30,000 square foot lots adjacent to platted property zoned SF-1. This would require increased size for lots 129-136 of Block 1. * The notes say the building setbacks will be 40 feet. Zoning requires a minimum of 35 feet. * The thoroughfare plan shows the continuation of Southridge Parkway as an 84' R.O.W. and Peytonville as a 64' R.O.W. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 25, 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Arvida/JMB Partners Levitt Engineers Cheatham & Associates In J C Rk N a w cc to r•f, •. li � ��� �i�� � ''�,� �'� � SOUTHRIDGE LAKES PARKWAY ROADWAY EXTENSION IN 1 SOUTB.AKE, TEXAS Prepared for. Mr. Sean G. Randall Arvida Company Prepared by. DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. 330 Union Station Dallas, TX 75202 (214)748-6740 J90208 December 26,1990 11-13 I)rShazn. �tarrk & Tam:. Inc. Fn_inrtr, • Planner. December 26, 1990 Mr. Sean G. Randall Vice President Arvida Company 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 350 Dallas, Texas 75248-4645 Re: SouthRidge Lakes Parkway Extension; J90208 Dear Mr. Randall: We have analyzed the thoroughfare system of the City of Southlake in the vicinity of the SouthRidge Lakes Addition. Our analysis has taken into consideration the traffic projections of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the recently approved plat for Stone Lakes Addition and the new Carroll High School. The Stone Lakes sub- division has been platted without the continuation of SouthRidge Lakes Parkway to the south. Access to Stone Lakes is provided off of FM 1709 at a location east of the intersection between FM 1709 and SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. Because SouthRidge Lakes Parkway will terminate at FM 1709, Peyton- ville Avenue, rather than SouthRidge Lakes Parkway, will be utilized by through traffic continuing on south to Continental. Commercial de- velopment planned at the intersection of Peytonville Avenue and FM 1709, as well as the planned Carroll High School, will become the major traffic generators in the area. These are easily accessible both from the north and south via Peytonville Avenue as well as from the east and west along Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). It appears most logical that the alignment for the north -south major thoroughfare in this vicinity should be along Peytonville Avenue rather than SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. This configuration would better serve the existing traffic desire lines in the city as well as the future traffic requirements of the high school and commercial de- velopments planned in the area. The Year 2000 traffic projections are depicted in the attached figure. The traffic volumes are based upon the projections of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and supplemented by our own projections for the SouthRidge Lakes sub- division. Mr. Sean Randal December 26, 1990 Page 2 The SouthRidge Lakes subdivision will generate about 3,800 trips per day when it is fully developed. These trips will be distributed between the north and south access points to the neighborhood. A two lane roadway can accommodate this projected demand at a very high level of service (LOS 'A"). The existing parkway can be transitioned into a 31-foot wide street over a distance of about 500 feet. The connection between SouthRidge Lakes Parkway and Peytonville Avenue to the north should be designed to discourage the through movement of traffic on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway. The width of the pavement on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway should be widened to 37 feet at locations where heavy turning movements will occur. In conclusion, we believe that the alignment of this major north -south thoroughfare in the City of Southlake should generally follow the existing route of Peytonville Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709 rather than a scheme which utilizes SouthRidge Lakes Parkway as a portion of its route. This alignment has the following advantages. o Continuity of System - Peytonville Avenue provides a better interface with the street and highway network of the city. Motorists southbound on Peytonville with destinations south of FM 1709 can continue south on the thoroughfare after crossing FM 1709. Whereas, under the SouthRidge Lakes option, these same motorists would be required to make two turning maneuvers on and off FM 1709. The recently platted Stone Lakes sub- division would prevent SouthRidge Lakes Parkway from being extended south of FM 1709. o Traffic Safety - The Peytonville Avenue alternative would be safer. The SouthRidge Lakes Parkway alternative would require additional turning maneuvers on the high volume highway (FM 1709). Traffic volumes on SouthRidge Lakes Parkway would pro- bably not be sufficient to warrant a traffic signal at FM 1709. A traffic signal currently serves the intersection of Peyton- ville Avenue and FM 1709. o Activity Centers - The Peytonville Avenue alternative better serves the traffic desires of motorists with destinations at the planned Carroll High School and the commercial districts planned on three quadrants of Peytonville and FM 1709. This alternative also better serves the travel desires of motorists destined for Carroll Elementary School on Continental. o Duplication of Facilities - The Peytonville option would uti- lize an established traffic corridor through the city. The SouthRidge Lakes option would establish a second corridor; however, it would not divert sufficient traffic off Peyton- ville to preclude its (Peytonville) need as a major thorough- fare. f1-15 Mr. Sean Randall December 26, 1990 Page 3 o Neighborhood Planning - The Peytonville Avenue alternative would preserve the integrity and quality of the SouthRidge Lakes Estates neighborhood. A major thoroughfare along South - Ridge Lakes Parkway would create a barrier between the east and west sides of the development. Through traffic on the parkway would be detrimental to the development of a safe and quality residential neighborhood. Sincerely, DESHAZO, STAREK b TANG, INC. John J. DeShazo, Jr. President Attachment 121915 Vl ''*; y" o° ��— Dove 10692 d o` 0 FIGURE 1 Adjusted Yr 2000 Projections- DS&T (Daily Traffic Volumes) EN ,ak0 4G� 569 1709) 11-17 Cn O N .0 0? 22569 17330 March 13, i 9s: City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carrell Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Reference No.: ZA 91-07 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: Thane you for your certified letter- in regard to the public hearing on March 21, 1991. The hearing in regard to the property described as 148.426 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, the T. M. Hood Surbey, Abstract No. 706, and the L.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686 be subdivided and used for Phases lV-VII, SouthRidee Lakes. When Arvida/JMB Gartner, L. -_i first presented the plan for SouthRidge Lakes to the City for approval, the plan included the four lane boulevant with a green aeit area anc side roads for the homeowners that lived on the main boulevard. The side roads were ties:gned to promote safety for small children and keep the main traffic flaw to a minimun for the homeowner. From the enclosed map included with your letter, it now appears that the four lane boulevard with green belt area arcs side roads is not in the futsune plans for Teases IV-Vli. It also appears that the four lane boulevarc will only be a two lane street and no longer will there be any side roads for the homeowners that live on the main thoroughfare. When Arvida/ MB Partners sold the plan to the City of Southlake and to the present homeowners that now live in SouthRicge Estates, the homeowners and The City were told that this is the way SoutnRidge Estates will look, every t-ee you see, every lake you see, all the slay areas, sicewalks etc... will be the way this Community will be developed and sold to the homeowners. Now after a year of homeowners living in this Dommunity, Arivida/.TMB Partners are revisin their whole picture of wmat they originally sold. _ The issue of widening Peytonville to a four lane street, would cost the City of Southlake a_at of money to be anle to buy the Property for tie "Righv-o7-way" for., the road. The U-19 Sullivan's pro erty wovic nave so ne osrcnasec, the s oper't'y of the Joyce's two horses, (their Tomes are right on the street frontage now), The Vanderforc's property, the Ingle front yard line, also, the existing homeowners in Arvida that back up to Peytonville Avenue would loose considerable property that you sold theca under anothen proposed plan that the City of Soutnlake already has approved. Plus, the widening of Peytonville Avenue would secure about an additional nine (9) lots for Arivida to build future homes. That weans more money for Arvida/JMB Partners and more taxes to the people in Southlake to pay for the property the City would have to purchase plus the actual road repair to Peytonville. Another paint to think about is the loss of all the trees on Peytonville for the ecology. I would like it to go on record, that the homeowners on Peytonville will fight this proposal with the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City of Southlake. What Arivida/JMB Partners are doing is not right' They have already been approved by The City of Southlake to build their SouthRidge Estates Community like the "Original" plan that was approved. Now that the new High School -is being built on t=M1709 and South Peytonville Avenue, should not dive Prvida/JMB Partners the right to renege on their "Original" clan. Thank you for your time and If I will be hack from cry trip on the 21st of March, (Spring Break Vacation), I will make every attempt to be present at t `s i s :reeving. I also, think the timing of this important hearing, was the intentions of Arvida/JMB Partners to possibly not have anyone attend this hearing. Sincerely, 'oanne m. i ng l e Homeowner Neal and Joanne Ingle 680 N. Peytonville Avenua Southlake, 7exas 76092 1t-17 �&-*"L--i1 L L-nLw njiNta Alex Mer i c as 1345 Ten Bar Court Southlake, TX 76092 March 19, 1991 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake Southlake, Texas 76092 To the Planning and Zoning Commission: Recently Arvida, developer of Southridge Lakes, expressed an interest in altering previous commitments to the City of Southlake for the development of Southridge Lakes Parkway, a four lane road connecting FM 1709 to North Peytonville at the entrance to Raven Bend. Their request to reduce this roadway from four lanes to two lanes concerns me. The condition of North Peytonville between FM 1709 and Raven Bend is poor, with no shoulder. The road's frequent sharp turns limit the visibility of other traffic. Most of the road has no lights. During icy weather, the road is too dangerous to use. Improvements to Peytonville are not possible, nor desired, as indicated by the recent defeat of the road improvement bond election. If Arvida is allowed to reduced the width of Southridge Lakes Parkway to two lanes, addition traffic demands will be placed on the section of North Peytonville from FM 1709 to Raven Bend. Once the new high school is completed, inexperienced drivers will begin using Peytonville to travel to and from school. When the Solona Club opens in April 1991 residents of Southridge Lakes, as well as others living south of FM 1709, will use Peytonville to access the new club. Likewise, when the new child care center in Solana opens in September 1991 parents with small infants will use Peytonville to travel north. As the Mcguire Thomas partners complete the planned second and third phases of the Solona complex, traffic will again increase. A direct four lane road is need from FM 1709 to the intersection of Raven Bend and Peytonville; as Arvida originally commited. If we allow the developer of Southridge Lakes to change zoning commitments for roads to satisfy changing budget needs, a damaging precedent will be set that other Southlake developers will follow. You�incerelYr • Alex Mericas A Re: Greg Jones 1365 Cross Timber Drive Southlake, Tx 76092 817/481-5298 March 15, 1991 OF:ICE OF CITY S£C ETAR�,V Promised Southridge Lakes Parkway road improvements by Arvida To the Southlake City Manager, Council, Planning and Zoning, and citizens: Recently Arvida, developer of Southridge Lakes, expressed an interest in altering previous commitments to the City of Southlake for the development of Southridge Lakes Parkway, a four lane road connecting FM 1709 to North Peytonville at the entrance to Raven Bend. Their desire to reduce this roadway from four lanes to two lanes greatly concerns me. In an effort to encourage Arvida to keep their original commitments, I would like to submit my reasons to the City of Southlake as to why a four lane roadway is essential for the growth of Southlake. The condition of North Peytonville can barely allow for two lanes of traffic. In certain locations, only a single vehicle can safely pass. The sharply winding road between Raven Bend and FM 1709 is difficult for through traffic to manuever, as evidenced by a driver who hit a truck and slid into a neighbor's lawn during icy weather last year. The lack of lighting on most of North Peytonville and the lack of city maintenance for lights such as those to the entrance of Cross Timber Hills, cause North Peytonville to been more dangerous at night. Furthermore improvements to Peytonville are not possible nor desired as indicated by the recent defeat of the road improvement bond election. North Peytonville is not suitable for all north bound traffic. Once the new high school is completed at the intersection of North Peytonville and FM 1709, newly licensed students will be imperiled by not having an alternate travel route. Students are not the only ones that require additional access from FM 1709 to North Peytonville. When the Solana Club opens in April 1991, many citizens from Southridge Lakes as well as other residents living south of FM 1709 will be traveling north. As the Mcguire Thomas partners complete the planned second and third phases of the Solona complex, traffic will increase again. Moreover the upcoming developments for the Circle T Ranch in Westlake will force additional demands on the narrow North Peytonville passageway. A direct four lane road is Bend and Peytonville. If change zoning commitments damaging precedent will be jGr Jones needed from FM 1709 to the intersection of Raven we allow the developer of Southridge Lakes to for roads to satisfy changing budget needs, a set that other Southlake developers will follow. City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-07 REVIEW NO: TWO PROJECT NAME: Revi Sout es DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P.-II 15303 Dallas Parkway Suite 590 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: Fax: DATE OF REVIEW: 03/27/91 Plat (Alternate 'B') - 03/27/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: John E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Show the west and north property lines in Peytonville. The distances on the northernmost tract do not scale correctly. 2. Although not required by the Council in their previous approval, staff recommends additional street connections to Shady Oaks and Peytonville to aid in emergency access. 3. Mr. Joyce has requested that Travis Court be stubbed to the center of his east property line. 4. The P.O.B. cannot be both the northwest corner of Lot 32 and the centerline of Peytonville Avenue. 5. Section 8.01-G requires 30,000 square foot lots adjacent to platted property zoned SF-1. This would require increased size for Lots 129-136 of Block 1. 6. Please be more clear as to the existing and proposed R.O.W. along Peytonville, or provide blow-up exhibit showing the area north of Phase III. * Staff is preparing alternative solutions to the R.O.W. width and pavement width for the extension of Southridge Parkway. These will be provided at the Council meeting. * The Thoroughfare Plan shows the continuation of Southridge Parkway as an 84' R.O.W. and Peytonville as a 64' R.O.W. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Arvida/JMB Partners Levitt Engineers Cheatham & Associates 11-22- City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-08 Final Plat ZA 91-08 is the Final Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III, being 18.282 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. The owner of the property is Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P.-II. This Final Plat is a portion of the previously approved Phase III Final Plat which included forty-nine (49) lots. This plat represents thirty (30) lots located North of Phase I and East of Peytonville Avenue. The original Phase III plat was never filed with Tarrant County. The property is zoned SF-20A. Please note that the developer has dedicated sufficient R.O.W. to accomodate the 64-foot R.O.W. required on North Peytonville Avenue. On March 21, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (4-1) of the Phase III Final Plat subject to the Plat Review letter dated 3/14/91 and in reference to item #9, the Commission recommended 35' front and 25' side building lines on Lot 60 and 35' front and 20' side building lines on Lot 56. They further recommended that City Staff provide the City Council with an exhibit showing the effect the proposed 64' R.O.W. will have on existing structures along N. Peytonville Ave. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 2/07/90 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TITLE OF PLAT: �ptiTi{IG1DG�66S - ftl.TE F. ` B�• %vkKTTAL DEADLINE: TOTAL LOTS: *- 517TOTAL ACRES: C %C OWNER (if different) I hereby certify that this plat is in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision Ordinances No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482, and the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and other ordinances, maps and codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary to be present at the applicable Planning and ion and City Council meetings to represent the enclosed request s, ZZ and addresv$d issues. Signed: Date: ********* * For Ci Use ly: I edge receipt of the preliminary plat application and the application fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 19 = Title: The following checklist is a partial summary of platting requirements required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 and No. 217, Drainage Ordinance No. 482 and the Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and other ordinances, maps and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat submittal. Shown On Plan Not Applic. GENERAL INFORMATION Acceptable scale: 1" = 501, 1" = 100', 1" = 200' North arrow, graphic & written scale in close proximity Vicinity Map Appropriate title, i.e. "A Preliminary Plat of..." Title includes City, County, State and survey name and abstract Title includes total gross acreage and date of preparation Name & address of record owner &.subdivider (if different) Name, address and phone of Engineer/Surveyor/Planner Standard approval block provided ADJACENT PROPERTY (within 200') Unplatted property: Name of record owner with vol. & page deed record Platted property: Show as dashed the lot lines, lot & block numbers, street names, subdivision name & plat record vol. & page. Locate City Limit or E.T.J. Lines Existing zoning label on this tract and adjacent property Existing easements adjacent to this property (Type & Size) Previously approved concept plans or preliminary plats Adjacent street intersections shown with street names 12-2- Pg. 2 of 2 Shown Not GENERAL SITE INFOPMATIONI 2/07/90 On Pl Applic. Legal description of the land to include: Owners deed reference, Name of survey, abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner, previously filed subdivision corner or USGS monument, Natal acreage.: Point of Beginning labeled on plat Subdivision boundary in heavy lines, with distances and bearings shown thereon that match legal description -� Existing R.O.W. shown, labeled and dimensioned, i.e. public streets, highways, alleys, private street/drives, railroads, etc. Show existing traveled roadway widths General outline of area embraced by tree cover -� All existing easements shown (Type & Size) Existing structures shown (Note whether to remain or not) PROPOSED INFORMATION Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line 10' U.E. along S.H. 114, F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709 Street alignment in accordance with ordinance requirements Curvilinear street requirements met (No. 483-5.03A) Street R.O.W. dimensioned —�� Sufficient street stubs into adjacent property (No. 483-5.03-K-1) Street names provided not similar to any existing street names R.O.W. dedication in accordance with the thoroughfare plan shown and dimensioned Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order .0 Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned Front building setback lines labeled or noted 50' setback line shown on S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 Lots to be dedicated for public use, labeled as such i.e. schools, parks, flood plains, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions (No. 483-Article VII) Parcels reserved for private use shown as described above �- Any proposed zoning labeled as such f Quantitative land use schedule provided (No. 483-3.02-C-30) Scaled dimensions of all lots, street R.O.W., easements, etc. 7� Approximate flood plain and floodway limits shown. Any easements to be abandoned (No. 483-3.07-C) Minimum lot width of 125' on certain lots M. 483-8.01-F) 30,000 sq. ft. min. lot area on certain lots (No. 483-8.01-F-3) Not ' ' Included Included PRELIMINARY ENGIkEERRIG PLANS Preliminary water layout showing all existing and proposed lines adjacent to the property and within the tract / Preliminary sewer layout Preliminary drainage study by Professional Civil Engineer provided with contours in conformance with criteria in Ordinances No. 483 (3.02-C-33) and No. 482 14 12 3 41 tit ARE� , , L to - , ' I I �N Ott 7.S SI rL , 40- . :z fr-■ I ELa T7 "90 WES7 RKIN CNEVIRS — SA'7-CH. Vol MiGIZAS y L L MAN p t PIN--A.MON MIFOIMV-4�-' -roe to is y 3K Ar r. 40� S- is .11 In Vl� is PUSUIAA 05 I'm c ro q4 I'v 'is • IL its 'ms F E MAP' City of Southiake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-08 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 03/14/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Southridge Lakes, Phase III DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 02/27/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P.-II 15303 Dallas Parkway Suite 590 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: Fax: ENG/SURVEYOR: John E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce St., Ste. 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE - CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Add the number of lots to the title block. 2. Label the Point of Beginning. 3. Show the off -site tracts northwest of this tract. Also label the lots on Cross Timber Hills. Our records show the Sullivan tract to be divided into two tracts. Show Ten Bar Drive. 4. The legal description should reference where the west line is in Peytonville Road, i.e. center of existing R.O.W., center of road, and/or survey line. This should be shown very clearly on the plat. Show distance from property corners to center of the existing apparent R.O.W. 5. Show the entire northwest corner as R.O.W. dedication. 6. Please provide an exhibit by a surveyor which shows the relationships of the bearings on the existing Peytonville centerline and how it will tangent with the proposed curve. 7. Provide a 15' D. + U.E. between Lots 38 and 39, Block 3. 8. Label the type and size of adjacent easements. 9. Lots 56 and 60 should have 35' setbacks along Pecos per ordinance requirements. The Commission and Council have previously approved reductions to 30' in similar situations. 10. Show the radius for Donley Court. Label the width of all R.O.W. 11. Label Block 4 on the proposed lots. 12. Please confirm that Lot 45, Block 3 and Lot 23, Block 4 have 100' widths at the setback line. 12-5 City of Southlake, Texas n * 5' utility easements are not being required on the perimeter of this property because they are providing their electric service in the front yards. * We recommend including the Chord bearing and distance for the non -tangent curve in the boundary. * We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction plans have been substantially approved. This will ensure adequate -easements . _ --- * The .-Developer's-.Agreement for this - addition should consider perimeter _street -and drainage, .open-. space :requirements, _off -site water __and sewer extensions,__ and off -site grade -to -drain permission._-__- * Originalsignatures will- be required on -each - of the- blackline mylars -prior to filing the plat. * The applicant should be aware that:any revisions made prior- -to City Council must be received at the -City by March 25, 1991.--_- * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Arvida/JMB Partners Levitt Engineers Cheatham & Associates 12- x 5/e' x 'J.W. SULLIVAN. ET UX VOL. 3370. P0. 647 D.R.T.C.T. 6ai / W. SULLIVAN. JR„ ET UX FUTURE PHA.` V. 956, P. S - 4. 312 1/2' I.R.F. D.R.T.C.T. / / N 89'01.07" E 880.18' 91AOI 97.75' 22220' 125.30' 252 81O y b4 _ N LOT 59 3 m O �/ �b ; u LOT 58 0. OLLOT 'b^ry y1 a N b 4L314 4SF. 'O 25020 IF. v/ N 40�-1 ya Q a 0653 M LOT 39 a N 31383 S.F. LOT 60 g •�/ ��a,TQ. 24.304 SF. T = 18.56' 147.13• N / p�50.o0. \ L = 33.07' o su%L Vlra 1` b s �*S 61v7 20' E yt� M I o .'t �$• g yT� �' � S 11* 18'20' E E �oQ + y n LOT 57 �\ a `� <�Q :� V 50.00• LOT 30 20.423 SF. 1� 1 1 LOT 41 <\�. 6/ 22.72E SF. cdI 1 �v I 24.055 SF. N o al 200.00' 200.00' 9 N N 8831.00' E I I 1 S 8931'00' w LOT 56 u I 1 a c -4'^ 22 639 SF. N LOT 37 I c o c I LOT 42 N u 'e , r� /# / ? LOT 27 20 3 99 SF. ( a , in I 20.400 SF. $ 211.22' s m a: ` / yJ2 776 SF. N 8931'04' E 1 / �!1 200.00' I I r I 200.00' LOT N 8931'00' E I$ I 5 8931 00' W g 2Q186 3F. I S j I LOT 26 66� 1-- Y LOT 36 raI Im LOT 43 a 198.49' I 22.578 SF. $ 20.599 S.F. r in r 20.600 S.F. $ 186.80' �p•,y I , , 1 I S 8931'04' W I yi t I N 6931'04' E 16jf 200.00' 1 t 200.00' c I I I 8 N 8931'00' E I I t S 89'51'00' W LOT 54 i 1 I I lox, g 20JOS S.F. LOT 25 I 'd { I 2L213 S.F. a1 g LOT 35 I 1 I LOT 44 w i 198.82' d -+ 14 0 20.002 SF. I! 1 I • I 2%172 S.F. I N 5 8931'04' W I 183.17' m BLOCK 199.96' 1 1 197.10' t I 1 I 1 N 85153'17' W to S 89'34'08' E I I S 89'36'01' E 20,846T53 , u J r% o I �m -I LOT 34 4 20208 SF. mI 1 LOT 24 I l0T as 18 S 1 1 22797 Sr. c c Y' 20.009 S.F.�o N 9, 79• ^' o nI 1 u� 1 I 8977• 193.23' I I 1 182.85• O ^ 't 56• w , ci N 2p?7 , t5 2T19'4 9 E 1 1 I N 83'44'07' W n LOT 32 J/ 74T07g• W O 2L994 S.F. m/ LOT 33 ( 1 LOT 46 y K v1 LOT 23 h /% u w h/ O %Dn / 2%741 S.F. At 20.591 S.F. I M134 SF. ^ 187 T n N Ss• U J ZOO.17. q 173.9r 180.00• 73114 J8. W p l N 7374 04. S 8 205 8' * N 230.0 . 1I _N / LOT 22LOT w SS'%04'►N1E 22.825F. I$`rl M140 S.F. 32 153 01' 19 I 48 N 164.51' \579 --`-8 �. 20 8a La• 4 ' S0 s \ \ c. SOUTHRIDGE LAKES " PHASE III FINAL PLAT IZ4 City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-08 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 03/27/91 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Southridge Lakes, Phase III DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P.-II 15303 Dallas Parkway Suite 590 Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone: Fax: 03/27/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: John E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce St., Ste._ 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Please provide an exhibit by a surveyor which shows the relationships of the bearings on the existing Peytonville centerline and how it will tangent with the proposed curve. 2. Label the 7.5' utility easements adjacent to R.O.W. on the off -site street. 3. Lot 60 should have a 35' setback along Pecos per Ordinance 483-A, Section 8.01-H. The Commission and Council have previously approved reductions to 30' in similar situations. 4. Please confirm that Lot 45, Block 3 and Lot 23, Block 4 have 100' widths at the setback line. 5. Provide a bearing on the east R.O.W. of Peytonville and along the rear of Lots 45 and 46, Block 3. * 5' utility easements are not being required on the perimeter of this property because they are providing their electric service in the front yards. * We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction plans have been substantially approved. This will ensure adequate easements. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage, parkland dedication requirements, off -site water and sewer extensions, and off -site grade -to -drain permission. * Original signatures will be required on each of the blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Arvida/JMB Partners Levitt Engineers _,O �1 Cheatham & Associates L. 0 Vllr VI %JVU1111QNGt I VACl.1 M E M O R A N D U M April 1, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-C Revisions Attached please find the revisions to Ordinance 480-C in its final form. This document reflects the changes discussed during the Joint Work Session of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, and the City Council on March 11, 1991. Per the request of Mr. Olson, I have reviewed the proposed revisions and have noted several needed changes. Copies of these changes have been returned by FAX to the City Attorney's office. They will attempt to have these corrections made prior to tomorrow's meeting and will hand deliver them at that time. 13- ORDINANCE NO. 480-C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY REVISING THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE IN RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS; BY DELETING SPECIAL EXCEPTION POWERS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; BY ADDING USES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS AS SPECIFIC USE PERMITS; BY AMENDING SITE PLAN AND CONCEPT PLAN REQUIREMENTS IN RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS; BY REVISING THE PERMITTED USES IN THE C-1, C-2, B-1 AND B-2 ZONING DISTRICTS; BY REVISING THE FLOOR AREA AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE C-1, C-4 AND I-1 ZONING DISTRICTS; BY REVISING THE REGULATIONS IN THE S-P-1 AND S-P-2 ZONING DISTRICTS; BY REVISING PARKING REQUIREMENTS; BY REVISING SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS REGARDING VISIBILITY, SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS; BY REVISING REGULATIONS AFFECTING SWIMMING POOLS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Zoning Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake now deems it necessary to amend Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -�- SECTION 1 That Section 4, Definitions, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising or adding the following definitions to read as follows: "KENNEL Any lot or premises on which (4) or more dogs, cats, or other domestic animals at least (4) months of age are housed or accepted for boarding, trimming, grooming, and/or bathing for which remuneration is received. LOT MEASUREMENTS C. Width of a lot shall mean the distance between the side property lines measured at the front building line. REVERSED FRONTAGE - Reversed frontage is a lot which has setback lines on both streets equal to the front setback line as required by the Zoning Ordinance unless such lots align back-to-back which would allow both lots to show a side yard setback along the side street. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT - A permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and authorized by the City Council for the use of land or structures in accordance to the provisions in Section 45." SECTION 2 That Section 6, Nonconforming Uses, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 6.8 thereof to read as follows: 6.8 SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE USE PERMITS• NOT NONCONFORMING USES - Any use for which a specific use permit is granted pursuant to this ordinance shall not be deemed a nonconforming use, but shall, without further action be deemed a conforming use in such district only for the single property granted such special exception or specific use permit. Any special exception or specific use permit heretofore granted by the Board of Adjustment or City Council which was lawfully existing at the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered a nonconforming use and shall be subject to all slake\480-c.ord(32891) -2- terms of this ordinance relating to nonconforming uses, unless the zoning classification under this ordinance for the property to which the special use attaches allows that particular use. Any special exception or specific use permit which has expired or which is not in compliance with the conditions placed upon such use shall not be permitted to continue." SECTION 3 That Section 8, "CS" Community Service District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 8.4 thereof to read as follows: 118.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 4 That Section 9, "AG" Agricultural District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 9.4 thereof to read as follows: "9.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." slake\480-c.ord(32891) -3- SECTION 5 That Section 10, "RE" Single Family Residential Estate District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 10.4 thereof to read as follows: "10.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 6 That Section 11, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 11.4 thereof to read as follows: "11.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 7 That Section 13, "SF-30" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 13.4 thereof to read as follows: "13.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and slake\480-c.ord(32891) -4- complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 8 That Section 14, "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 14.4 thereof to read as follows: "14.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 9 That Section 16, "MF-1" Two Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 16.4 thereof to read as follows: "16.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." slake\480-c.ord(32891) -5- SECTION 10 That Section 17, "MF-2" Multiple Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 17.4 thereof to read as follows: "17.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 11 That Section 18, "0-1" Office District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 18.4 thereof to read as follows: "18.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 12 That Section 20, 11C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 20.4 thereof to read as follows: 1120.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and slake\480-c.ord(32891) -6- complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 13 That Section 21, 11C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 21.4 thereof to read as follows: "21.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 14 That Section 22, "C-3" General Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 22.4 thereof to read as follows: "22.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." slake\480-c.ord(32891) -7- SECTION 15 That Section 23, 11C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 23.4 thereof to read as follows: "23.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 16 That Section 24, 11B-1" Business Service Park District, of Ordinance No. 4801 as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 24.4 thereof to read as follows: "24.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 17 That Section 25, 11B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 25.4 thereof to read as follows: "25.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and slake\480-c.ord(32891) -8- complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 18 That Section 26, 11I-1" Light Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 26.4 thereof to read as follows: "26.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 19 That Section 27, "I-2" Heavy Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 27.4 thereof to read as follows: "27.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. When the City Council grants a specific use permit for petroleum operations in the I-2 district, such use is further conditioned by the following provisions: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -9- (a) Development Regulations - The development regulations set forth in Section 27.5 apply with the following additions and changes: (1) The height restriction as set out in Section 27.5(a) apply to buildings designed for human occupancy and are not intended to regulate the height of towers, fuel storage tanks, antennas or other accessory or ancillary structures. The maximum height of non -building structures shall be limited to fifty (50) feet but this number may be exceeded by approval of the City Council as outlined in Section 33.5(b) of this ordinance. (2) Section 27.5(g) shall not apply to petroleum operations. (3) Delivery Routes: Each petroleum operation business within the I-2 zoning classification shall provide the Administrative Official with a route map showing the roadways over which normal delivery or transfer operations of petroleum products will occur in relation to the normal business operations of that activity. The purpose of this requirement is to assist the police department and fire department of the City of Southlake to prepare appropriate emergency response plans to assist in managing any accident relating to the movement of quantities of petroleum product through the City. The delivery route plan shall consist of a map outlining the routes used by delivery equipment or systems. A narrative shall accompany the map explaining the type of products moved and the general schedule of movements of these products. (4) Delivery of Inspection Reports: To the extent that any petroleum product related business within the I-2 zoning classification is subject to on -site safety or operational inspections by a state or federal regulatory agency, the business operation in question shall provide the Administrative Official with a copy of the most recent inspection reports with any and all attachments or appendices within ten (10) working days from the date upon which each and every inspection report is received. The purpose of this requirement is to allow slake\480-c.ord(32891) _10- the City and its public safety employees to evaluate and monitor any potential environmental or safety hazards resulting from the operation of these facilities. The City of Southlake will not make public this information, but will use it exclusively for public safety and environmental planning and analysis. (b) Performance Standards - The performance standards as set forth in Section 27.7 shall apply with the following additional requirements: (1) In addition to the standards set forth in Section 27.7(g) regarding fire hazards, each and every petroleum product related business within the I-2 zoning classification shall annually file a Fire and Emergency Safety and Response Plan with the Fire Marshal of the City of Southlake. Said plan shall be filed on or before January 5th of each calendar year. The Plan shall consist of a map of the site or facility and shall include the location of all firefighting equipment, firefighting apparatus, fire alarms and/or smoke detectors. The plan shall further explain what special provisions for firefighting or emergency action exist on or within the site. It is anticipated that this requirement will identify special firefighting equipment or apparatus that may be unique to the specific facility. Attached to the annual report, will be the identification of any petroleum products stored on the site along with a narrative description of the normal procedures to be followed in fighting a fire or responding to an explosion report dealing with that substance if it is not a substance regularly encountered by municipal firefighting personnel. The purpose of this requirement is to assist the fire department of the City of Southlake in preparing to handle any emergency responses requested or required in the I- 2 zoning district. As a further portion of this plan, the business shall identify any special breathing apparatus or equipment located on -site for use of business personnel in the event of an emergency. Information concerning the slake\480-c.ord(32891) 11 specific type of such equipment shall be included within the plan. (2) State and Federal Regulations: Each and every petroleum product related business within the I-2 zoning classification shall provide the Administrative Official with a specific listing of all state and federal regulations or requirements identifying health, safety and environmental regulations and requirements applicable to petroleum products terminal operations, blending operations or pipeline transfer operations. It is recognized that these regulations vary by type of business activity and by size of business activity. In addition to identifying the regulation under which the business must operate, each business activity must also provide a listing of the number of regularly scheduled inspections which are undertaken to ensure compliance with those requirements. If an individual contact point with the regulatory agency has been established and is traditional for this type of operation, the business will provide the Administrative Official with the name or position title and the mailing address and telephone number of the contact individual within the state or federal regulatory agency. The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to coordinate its regulatory and monitoring activities with those of appropriate state and federal agencies. Each business providing information under this provision will be required to supplement and/or update that information as changes occur. (3) Additional Standards: The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council the establishment of additional performance standards to protect neighboring areas and land uses from potential industrial hazards and nuisances as necessary." SECTION 20 That Section 28, "HC" Hotel District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 28.4 thereof to read as follows: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -12- "28.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 21 That Section 29, "MH" Manufactured Housing District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 29.4 thereof to read as follows: "29.4 SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45, together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance." SECTION 22 That Section 10, "RE" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 10.5 to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the lot area." slake\480-c.ord(32891) .13_ SECTION 23 That Section 11, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 11.5 to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 1,000 square feet." SECTION 24 That Section 13, "SF-30" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 13.5 to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 750 square feet." SECTION 25 That Section 14, "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Paragraph e. of Subsection 14.5 to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet." SECTION 26 That Section 18, "0-1" Office District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding new Subsections 18.6, 18.7, and 18.8 to read as follows: " 18.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall slake\480-c.ord(32891) -14- be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning. 18.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 18.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the 0-1 district." SECTION 27 That Section 20, 1IC-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by deleting the permitted use in Subsection 20.2.a.5., and by revising the permitted use in Subsection 20.2.a.1. to read as follows: "l. Offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including fabrication, manufacture, or production of goods." That Section 20, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, is further amended by revising paragraph f. of Subsection 20.5 to read as follows: "f. Floor Area: Each store, shop or business shall have a minimum of five hundred (500) square feet of floor area, but the minimum size for a separate building or structure existing within this district shall be two thousand (2,000) square feet. The maximum floor area contained within any structure existing in this district shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet." stake\480-c.ord(32891) -15- That Section 20, 11C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, is further amended by adding new Subsections 20.6, 20.7, and 20.8 to read as follows: " 20.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning. 20.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 20.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the C-1 district." SECTION 28 That Section 21, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising the permitted use No. 21. in Subsection 21.2, to read as follows: 1121. Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. Such use may offer gasoline, oil, greasing and accessories, and may contain a small car wash facility, but may not include fender or body repairs, mechanical services, rear -end, transmission or engine overhaul." That Section 21, 11C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, is further amended by adding new Subsections 21.6, 21.7, and 21.8, to read as follows: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -16- " 21.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning. 21.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 21.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the C-2 district." SECTION 29 That Section 22, "C-3" General Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 22.6 thereof to read as follows: " 22.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." That Section 22, "C-3" General Commercial District is further amended by adding new Subsections 22.7 and 22.8 to read as follows: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -17- " 22.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 22.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the C-3 district." SECTION 30 That Section 23, "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsections 23.6 and 23.7 thereof to read as follows: " 23.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." 23.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application." That Section 23, 11C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District is further amended by adding a new Subsection 23.8 to read as follows: " 23.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the C-4 district." SECTION 31 That Section 24, 11B-1" Business Service Park District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 24.6 thereof to read as follows: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -18. " 24.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." That Section 24, "B-1" Business Service Park District is further amended by renumbering the current Subsection 24.7 as Subsection 24.9, and by adding new Subsections 24.7 and 24.8 to read as follows: " 24.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 24.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the B-1 district." SECTION 32 That Section 25, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 25.6 thereof to read as follows: " 25.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. slake\480-c.ord(32891) _19- The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." That Section 25, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District is further amended by adding new Subsections 25.7 and 25.8 to read as follows: " 25.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 25.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the B-2 district." SECTION 33 That Section 26, 11I-1" Light Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 26.6 thereof to read as follows: " 26.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." That Section 26, "I-1" Light Industrial District is further amended by renumbering the current Subsection 26.7 as Subsection 26.9, and by adding new Subsections 26.7 and 26.8 to read as follows: " 26.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. slake\480-c.ord(32891) _20_ 26.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the I-1 district." SECTION 34 That Section 27, "I-2" Heavy Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 27.6 thereof to read as follows: " 27.6 CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance shall be submitted either with the zoning change request or prior to the submittal of the development site plan. All properties zoned at the effective date of this ordinance which do not have an approved Concept Plan on file with the City shall submit a Concept Plan meeting the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance prior to submittal of the development site plan. The Concept Plan shall be processed in accordance with this ordinance and state law for changes in zoning." That Section 27, "I-2" Heavy Industrial District is further amended by renumbering the current Subsection 27.7 as Subsection 27.9, and by adding new Subsections 27.7 and 27.8 to read as follows: " 27.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. 27.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the I-2 district." SECTION 35 That Section 28, "HC" Hotel District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 28.7 to read as follows: stake\480-c.ord(32891) -21- " 28.7 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. That Section 28, "HC" Hotel District, is further amended by adding a new Subsection 28.8 to read as follows: 28.8 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan meeting the requirements of Section 40 shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for any construction in the HC district or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any property in this district. In addition, the site plan shall show in detail that all pool areas are to be constructed in strict compliance with Ordinance No. 481 as now or hereafter amended." SECTION 36 That Section 23, 11C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraphs b., c., d., e. and f. of Subsection 23.5, to read as follows: " b. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. c. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet; provided, however, where a C-4 zoned lot abuts on the side of property zoned as single family residential, each portion of a building in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height shall be set back one (1) additional foot for each additional one (1) foot in height. d. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than ten (10) feet except where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding sixty (60) percent of the lot area. f. Floor Area: Each store, shop or business shall have a minimum of five hundred (500) square feet of floor area, but the minimum size for a separate building or structure existing within this district shall be two thousand (2,000) slake\480-c.ord(32891) -22- square feet. There is no maximum floor space, except as specified herein under other provisions of this ordinance." SECTION 37 That Section 24, "B-1" Business Service Park District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising the permitted uses in Subsection 24.2.a.15., to read as follows: 1115. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies, provided that incidental equipment and supplies are primarily stored within a building or enclosed within a screening device. Nursery products themselves may be grown, raised, stored and marketed outdoors. The outdoor storage and sale of nursery products shall be exempt from all other outdoor storage and screening requirements contained within this ordinance. These products are established as an exception to all other outdoor storage and screening requirements as by their very nature they assist in meeting the landscaping, screening, buffering and open space goals of the City." That Section 24 "B-1" Business Service Park District, is hereby further amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 24.5, to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: As approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Site Plan Review with requirements to be established based upon an analysis of the location, configuration, environmental impact and compatibility of this project with adjacent land uses." SECTION 38 That Section 25, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising the permitted uses in Subsection 25.2.a.14., to read as follows: 1114. Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies, provided that incidental equipment and supplies are primarily stored within a building or enclosed within a slake\480-c.ord(32891) _23_ screening device. Nursery products themselves may be grown, raised, stored and marketed outdoors. The outdoor storage and sale of nursery products shall be exempt from all other outdoor storage and screening requirements contained within this ordinance. These products are established as an exception to all other outdoor storage and screening requirements as by their very nature they assist in meeting the landscaping, screening, buffering and open space goals of the City." That Section 25, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, is further amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 25.5, to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: As approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Site Plan Review with requirements to be established based upon an analysis of the location, configuration, environmental impact and compatibility of this project with adjacent land uses." SECTION 39 That Section 26, "I-1" Light Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding a new permitted use as Subsection 26.2.b.16A., to read as follows: "16A. Farrier (horseshoeing)" That Section 26, "I-1" Light Industrial District, is further amended by revising paragraphs e. and h. of Subsection 26.5, to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: As approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Site Plan Review with requirements to be established based upon an analysis of the location, configuration, environmental impact and compatibility of this project with adjacent land uses. * * * slake\480-c.ord(32891) -24- h. All business shall be conducted entirely within a building unless outside storage is approved in connection with a specific use permit development site plan." SECTION 40 That Section 27, 11I-2" Heavy Industrial District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph e. of Subsection 27.5, to read as follows: "e. Maximum Lot Coverage: As approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Site Plan Review with requirements to be established based upon an analysis of the location, configuration, environmental impact and compatibility of this project with adjacent land uses." SECTION 41 That Section 30, "PUD" Planned Unit Development District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 30.5, to read as follows: "30.5 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - The height, setback, area, floor space, and other development regulations for permissible uses in a PUD district shall conform to the development regulations which would be applicable to such uses if the same were situated in the most restrictive district in which such uses are permitted. However, the City Council may approve more flexible development standards if other design features provide adequate protection to surrounding and adjacent properties. For any residential PUD, the maximum density permitted shall be equal to the maximum density permitted under the least restrictive single family zoning district at the time the PUD is granted. In any residential PUD, all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. When developing a residential PUD in phases, the City Council shall establish in the individual PUD ordinance the maximum density permitted in each phase to assure that the maximum density of slake\480-c.ord(32891) -25- the entire residential PUD is not exceeded once complete buildout is achieved. That Section 30 "PUD" Planned Unit Development District, is further amended by revising paragraph c. of Subsection 30.6, to read as follows: "c. Minimum off-street parking requirements shall be established in the approved development site plan. Any deviation less than the minimum requirements specified in Section 35 shall require specific approval from the City Council." That Section 30 "PUD" Planned Unit Development District is further amended by renumbering Sections 30.10, 30.11 and 30.12 to Sections 30.9, 30.10 and 30.11, respectively. SECTION 42 That Section 31, "S-P-1" (Detailed) Site Plan District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: " 31.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - The S-P-1 Site Plan District is utilized to develop difficult sized and shaped land areas to promote new planning concepts; to develop multiple land uses; and to establish compatible land uses within a more restrictive neighborhood. No minimum land area is required for the S-P-1 district. 31.2 PERMITTED USES a. No land shall be used and no building shall be erected for or converted to any use other than the specific use or uses authorized by an ordinance of the City of Southlake granting a zoning change to an S-P-1 (Detailed) Site Plan District under the terms and conditions of this subsection and in accordance with the procedures set forth below. Any use not prohibited by this ordinance or other ordinances of the City may be authorized in an S-P-1 district; provided, however, no single-family residential uses; either attached or detached, may be authorized in an S-P-1 District. b. Similar uses which are permitted in the Zoning Ordinance may be permitted in the S-P-1 zone, slake\480-c.ord(32891) -26- provided a revised site plan has been submitted for recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City Council for any such proposed similar use, upon the written application for an amendment to the S-P-1 Site Plan District previously granted and in accordance with all the regulations of this Section 31. The determination of whether a use is similar shall be in the sole discretion of the City Council. c. A summary shall be provided which lists the proposed uses within the district. This may be via attached text or shown on the required site plan. 31.3 APPLICATION - A change of zoning to an S-P-1 Site Plan District shall be granted by the City Council only upon the written application of the owner or his representative and a recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. No variances to other city ordinances, codes or regulations will be permitted. The S-P-1 Site Plan District allows the City Council to approve changes to the regulations of this ordinance only. 31.4 SITE PLAN - Applicants for S-P-1 zoning must file an application for site plan approval in accordance with the requirements of Section 40 of this ordinance. 31.5 REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION a. The Planning and Zoning Commission in submitting its recommendations to the City Council and the City Council in making its decision shall state a list of the reasons for approval or disapproval of each case and request. The stated reasons shall be incorporated in any ordinance approving a request. b. On the Official Zoning Map, an S-P-1 Site Plan District shall bear the designation S-P-1 followed by the ordinance number, in parenthesis, rezoning the property to a Site Plan District. c. The City Council may impose any condition or restriction upon the use of the property rezoned, as may be necessary to secure and protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare and to protect adjoining property and the value thereof, including the dedication of street rights -of -way for adequate flow of traffic. Such conditions and restrictions shall not be construed as conditions precedent to the granting slake\480•c.ord(32891) _27_ of the S-P-1 Site Plan District use, but shall be construed as conditions precedent to the granting of a Certificate of Occupancy. d. A screening and landscaping plan shall be required where such treatment is essential to the proper arrangement of the development. Such plan, when required, should include screening walls, ornamental planting, lawns and gardens, playgrounds and wooded areas that are to be retained." SECTION 43 That Section 32, 'IS-P-2" (Generalized) Site Plan District, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: " 32.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT. The S-P-2 Site Plan District is utilized to permit flexibility of area regulations while restricting usages. The basic land use district shall be identified for reference to area regulations. The land area for an S-P-2 Site Plan District shall not be less than two (2) acres in size. 32.2 PERMITTED USES a. No land shall be used and no building shall be erected for or converted to any use other than the general uses authorized by an ordinance of the City of Southlake granting a zoning change to S-P-2 Site Plan District zoning under the terms and conditions of this section. No variances to any other City ordinance, code or regulation will be permitted within this district. All applications will be processed in accordance with the procedures set forth below. Any use not prohibited by this ordinance or other ordinances of the City may be authorized in an S-P-2 district; provided, however, no single- family residential uses, either attached or detached, may be authorized in an S-P-2 District. b. Similar uses which are permitted in the Zoning Ordinance may be permitted in the S-P-2 zone, provided a revised site plan has been submitted for recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City Council for any such proposed similar use, upon the written application for an amendment to the S-P-2 Site Plan District previously granted and in accordance with all the regulations of this slake\480-c.ord(32891) -28. Section 32. The determination of whether a use is similar shall be in the sole discretion of the City Council. C. A summary shall be provided which lists the proposed uses within the district. This may be via attached text or shown on the required Concept Plan. 32.3 APPLICATION - A change of zoning to an S-P-2 Site Plan District shall be granted by the City Council only upon the written application of the owner or his representative and a recommendation of Planning and Zoning Commission. No variances to other city ordinances, codes or regulations will be permitted. The S-P-1 Site Plan District allows the City Council to approve variances to regulations of this ordinance only. 32.4 CONCEPT PLAN - Applicants for S-P-2 zoning must file an application for Concept Plan approval in accordance with the requirements of Section 41 of this ordinance. 32.5 REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION a. The Planning and Zoning Commission in submitting its recommendations to the City Council and the City Council in making its decision shall state a list of the reasons for approval and disapproval of each case and request. The stated reasons shall be incorporated in any ordinance approving a request. b. On the Official Zoning Map, an S-P-2 Site Plan District shall bear the designation S-P-2 followed by the ordinance number, in parenthesis, rezoning the property to a Site Plan District. c. The City Council may impose any condition or restriction upon the use of the property rezoned, as may be necessary to secure and protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare and to protect adjoining property and the value thereof, including the dedication of street rights -of -way for adequate flow of traffic. Such conditions and restrictions shall not be construed as conditions precedent to the granting of the S-P-2 Site Plan District use, but shall be construed as conditions precedent to the granting of a Certificate of Occupancy. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -29- 32.6 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN - A development site plan shall be required for a building permit within the S-P-2 (Generalized) Site Plan District. This site plan shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with Section 40 of this ordinance. Approval of this site plan shall be the authority of the City Council upon a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission." SECTION 44 That Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 33.2, to read as follows: " 33.2 FENCES - Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, fences, walls, and hedges may be permitted in any required yard, or along the edge of any yard as a screening, decorative or containment element not to exceed eight (8) feet in height, provided the following shall be observed: a. At Intersections - On a corner lot in any district, nothing shall be erected, placed, planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to naturally impede vision between a height of two (2) feet and ten (10) feet above the centerline grades along each R.O.W. line for a distance of ten (10) feet by forty (40) feet. b. At Interior Lots - On an interior lot in any district nothing shall be erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow in such a manner as to impede vision or in any way create a traffic hazard to motorists, whether the impediment includes entering or exiting any public highway, street, alley, or private street or driveway from or to adjacent private property." That Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations, is further amended by deleting Subsection 33.4 in its entirety. That Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations, is further amended by deleting the following listed appendices from Subsection 33.8: a. Site Plans required for all non-residential developments slake\480-c.ord(32891) -30- C. Highway, Farm -to Market Road and Thoroughfare setbacks i. Airport Zoning ordinance j. Mobile Home Park Regulation Ordinance k. Site preparation and excavation ordinances and by adding the following appendices thereto, so that Section 33.8 reads as follows: " 33.8 APPENDICES - The City Council may issue supple- mentary auxiliary regulations by ordinance and may include them in this ordinance as appendices. Contemplated or already in existence at the writing of this ordinance are the following regulations that may be applicable to proposed development and may or may not be included as an appendix to this basic ordinance: a. Drainage Ordinance No. 482 b. Masonry exteriors required on certain buildings. C. Perimeter Street Ordinance No. 494 d. Subdivision Ordinance. e. Sign Ordinance. f. Animal Control that regulates the number and reason for housing animals in certain areas. g. Noise Regulation Ordinance. h. Floodplain or flood hazard ordinances. i. Sewer Pro Rata Ordinance No. 493 j. Fence Maintenance Ordinances." That Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations, is further amended by revising Subsection 33.14 thereof to read as follows: 1133.14 HEALTH REGULATIONS: SEWAGE DISPOSAL - If the permitted use is not to be immediately served by a sewage collection system connected to an approved community treatment plant or public sewage facility, then such use shall be connected to an approved on -premise septic tank and subsurface drainage field designed and constructed in conformance with the methods slake\480-c.ord(32891) -31- and standards approved by the State Department of Health, City's Plumbing Code, and Ordinance No. 514. Where the use of an on -premise septic tank and subsurface drainage field is to be employed, the minimum lot size must be one acre per family, residence or commercial structure and must be approved by the City Council of the City of Southlake. All lots to be served by a private or septic system must have that system installed in accordance with Ordinance No. 514 and any other applicable city ordinances. Occupancy of any building or structure shall be prohibited and no certificate of occupancy issued unless the provisions of this subsection and of subsection 33.13 are fully complied with." SECTION 45 That Section 34, Accessory Uses, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising the accessory uses permitted in paragraph f. of Subsection 34.1 to read as follows: ACCESSORY USE f. Private swimming pool, wading pools, and game courts (lighted and unlighted), provided that if lighted, the lighting shall be so directed and shielded so as not to shine directly on any adjacent residential property; and further provided that any such pool or game court is for the private use of the site occupants and their guests, and not operated as a business. All "at grade" swimming pools with a water depth greater than twenty-four (24) inches and "above grade" swimming pools having a water depth twenty-four (24) inches or more, except for portable tot pools, shall be enclosed by a fence and gate of a height so designated by Ordinance 481 as well as the Uniform Building Code (whichever is the most restrictive) of such material and design to discourage unauthorized entry to the facility. Ornamental pools or ponds designed for decorative purposes and having a depth slake\480-c.ord(32891) -32- DISTRICT WHERE PERMITTED AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20b, MF-1, MF-2 and HC less than twenty-four (24)inches are not subject to a special fencing requirement and may be located within required front or rear yards provided that they maintain a minimum ten foot (100) setback from the closest property line. All other pool(s) may be located in a side or rear yard, but not within a front yard, and shall not be located closer than five feet (51) to any side or rear property line nor be located any closer than five feet (51) to another structure." That Section 34, Accessory Uses, is further revising Subsection 34.2 to read as follows: amended by " 34.2 ACCESSORY BUILDING - The following regulations shall govern the location and use of any accessory building: a. Accessory buildings having a permanent foundation shall be erected no closer than ten feet (101) to a property line located in the rear yard. Those structures not on a permanent foundation may be placed as close as five feet (51) to a property line located in the rear yard. b. No accessory building shall be erected within ten feet (101) of any other building, except that detached residential garages may be located not closer than five feet (51) to the main dwelling. C. No accessory building shall be constructed upon a lot until the construction of the principal building or use has actually been commenced, and no accessory building shall be used unless the main building in a lot is completed and used. d. No accessory building shall be used for dwelling purposes other than by domestic servants employed entirely on the premises or by family members and only in compliance with individual district regulations. e. Accessory buildings shall not exceed one story or fourteen feet (141) in height. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -33- f. No accessory building shall be located forward of the principal building on the lot." SECTION 46 That Section 35, Off -Street Parking, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising paragraph a. of Subsection 35.5, to read as follows: a. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be construed to be the next highest whole number." That Section 35, Off -Street Parking, is further amended by revising the introductory paragraph of paragraph b.(6) of Subsection 35.6, to read as follows: "(6) Office, Professional or Financial Uses: For all categories listed under this heading, a minimum of eight spaces shall be provided for the first 1000 sq. ft. The following requirements pertain to the remaining square footage." That Section 35, Off -Street Parking, is further amended by revising paragraph b.(10) of Subsection 35.6, to read as follows: " (10) Industrial Uses: One (1) off-street parking space required per 1000 square feet of under -roof industrial area and one (1) space per each 300 square feet of under -roof office area." SECTION 47 That Section 40, Site Plans, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: " 40.1 GENERAL - The following requirements set forth in this section shall govern the approval of all site plans required by this ordinance unless otherwise provided in this ordinance. If any conflict exists between the language contained in this section regarding site plan requirements and any site plan ordinance of the City, the more specific requirements shall apply. 40.2 APPLICATION - A written application for site plan approval shall be filed with the Administrative slake\480-c.ord(32891) -34- Official on forms prepared by the City. The application shall be signed by the owner, lessee, developer or option holder of the property and shall be accompanied by (a) a reproducible drawing and copies as required by the Administrative Official; and (b) a copy of the plat where the proposed site is located. 40.3 SITE PLAN INFORMATION REQUIRED - For purposes of determining the exact information required on each site plan, refer to the following chart summary of those districts requiring preparation of a site plan. Zoning District Name Section Symbol Residential P.U.D. Development Site Plan 30.8 (RPUD) Non -Residential P.U.D. Development Site Plan 30.8 (MXPUD)* Detailed Site Plan District 31.4 (SPi) Specific Use Permit 45.2 (SUP) Required for a building permit N/A (BP) Required in all plans N/A (All) * Requirements listed for MXPUD do not apply to any single family portions of the PUD unless noted on the item. A Residential P.U.D. is a development proposal in which ninety percent (90%) or more of the development proposed consists of single family residential or duplex districts. All other P.U.D. development proposals not meeting the criteria of single family residential districts shall fall under the category of a mixed use development site plan. The following criteria is a comprehensive list of site plan requirements. At the end of each criteria is a symbol corresponding to the symbols shown above for each of the referenced districts. If this symbol is shown then this criteria is required on all site plans in that district. a. Acceptable scale: 1"=201, 1"=401, 1"=100' or as approved. North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. (All) b. Small scale location map shown. (All) C. Title includes appropriate title (i.e., "Site Plan", "Development Site Plan", etc.), name of development or platted lot and block designation, City, County and State, date of preparation. (All) d. Name and address of owner. (All) slake\480-c.ord(32891) -35- e. Name, address and phone of firm preparing the Site Plan. (All) f. Metes and bounds labeled on property boundary. (All) g. R.O.W. on or adjacent to the site labeled and dimensioned, adjacent street widths shown. (All) h. Adjacent property labeled with owner's name, existing zoning, land use map designation. (All) i. The width and type of proposed bufferyard must be labeled. (All) j. Designation of the location and size of all points of ingress/egress to the site. (All) k. All pedestrian walks, malls and open areas for use by tenants or the public. (All) 1. The location, type and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices. (All) M. Site Data Summary Chart (by phase and in total) to include the following items: - Existing zoning of this tract and any proposed zoning. (All) - Gross acreage and net acreage of the project. (All) - Number of proposed lots. (RPUD, MXPUD including residential) - Residential density (RPUD, MXPUD including residential) - Percentage of site coverage. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) - Anticipated schedule of development. (All except BP, SUP) - Parking and loading spaces required and provided. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) - Area of open space. (All) - Open space as a percentage. (All) - Outside storage as a percentage. (All) n. Show the following related to existing or proposed buildings: - Location, dimensions, maximum height, number of stories, use or uses contained therein, gross floor area. (All except RPUD). - Square footage broken down by use. (SP1, SUP, BP) . - Entrances and exits to buildings. (BP, SP1) slake\480-c.ord(32891) -36- - Architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures, noting whether or not the facades meet the masonry ordinance requirements. (SP1, SUP, BP) - Distance between buildings and distance from building to property lines. (All, except RPUD) o. Related to parking requirements: - Clear designation of all parking stalls intended for off-street parking and for off-street loading. (All, except RPUD) - Dimensions of such parking and loading areas. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) - Type of surface material. (BP, SP1) - Any intended lighting shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) p. Front building lines shown. (All) Rear and side building lines shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP). q. Location, size, height, type and orientation of signs, lighting luminaries and exterior auditory speakers. The applicant shall also provide representative renderings of the particular sign types, facings, material compositions and colors. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) r. The location of all on -site facilities for liquid and solid waste temporary storage pending disposal or any proposed septic fields. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) S. Location of all trash dumpsters. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) t. The types of surfacing, such as paving ( for example, asphalt, concrete, brick), turfing or gravel, to be used at the various locations. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) U. Easements on or adjacent to the site labeled and dimensioned. (SP1, SUP, BP, RPUD and MXPUD if they impact the development) V. Nearest fire hydrant dimensioned to property corner and any proposed fire hydrants shown. (MXPUD, SP1, SUP, BP) W. The fire lane width must be designated with all curb radii adjacent to the fire lane labeled. (BP, MXPUD, SP1, SUP) X. The proposed finished grade of the site, shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot slake\480-c.ord(32891) -37- elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Included must be directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show center line of water courses and existing drainage easements. (BP, SP1) y. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information shown. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. (BP, SP1) Z. A summary chart showing all proposed variances to the closest zoning district in which the proposed use(s) would be allowed. This should show the referenced zoning district, the existing requirements and the proposed variance. (RPUD, MXPUD including residential, SUP, SP1) aa. Intended category of uses labeled. (All) bb. Show any areas intended for outside storage and method of screening. (All, except RPUD) 40.4 REVIEW OF SITE PLAN a. Unless otherwise provided in this ordinance, City Staff shall be responsible for the administrative approval of all site plans required by this section. b. In granting or denying an application for a site plan approval, the City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, as appropriate, shall take into consideration the following factors: 1. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding the site. 2. Safety from fire hazards, and measures of fire control. 3. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage. 4. Noise producing elements, and glare of vehicular and stationary lights and the effect of such lights on the established character of the neighborhood. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -38- 5. Location, lighting and type of signs; relation of signs to traffic control and the adverse effect on adjacent properties. 6. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood. 7. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress/egress points for parking and off- street loading spaces; and protection of public health by all weather surfacing on all parking areas to control dust. 8. Such other measures as will secure and protect public health, safety, morals and general welfare. 40.5 IMPROVEMENTS - All improvements to the land and all buildings and construction on the land shall be in accordance with the site plan approved in compliance with this section. 40.6 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION - On approval of the site plan by the City Council, or the Administrative Staff, as appropriate, all necessary permits or certificates authorized thereby may be issued. a. Subsequent to such approval, minor changes may be authorized by the Administrative Official when such minor changes will not cause any of the following circumstances to occur: 1. A change in the character of the development; 2. An increase in the ratio of the gross floor areas in structures to the area of any lot; 3. An increase in the intensity of use; 4. A reduction in the originally approved separations between buildings; 5. An increase in the problems of circulation, safety, and utilities; 6. An increase in the external effects on adjacent property; slake\480-c.ord(32891) -39- 7. A reduction in the originally approved setbacks from property lines; 8. An increase in ground coverage by structures; 9. A reduction in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor area in the structures. 10. A change in the subject, size, lighting, flashing, animation or orientation of originally approved signs. b. Any proposed amendment to a site plan which in the opinion of the Administrative Official does not meet the criteria of sub -paragraph 40.6a above may only be approved by the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 40.7 CONFLICT WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS - If any conflict exists between the language contained herein regarding site plan requirements and any site plan ordinance of the City, the more specific requirements shall apply. 40.8 COMPLIANCE WITH CONCEPT PLAN - All site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. If, in the opinion of the Administrative Official, the site plan does not substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved by the City Council, the applicant shall either seek approval of a revised Concept Plan per Section 41 or a revised site plan, per Section 40. Approval of these plans shall be within the authority of the City Council upon a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission." SECTION 48 That Section 41, Concept Plans, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: " 41.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - The Concept Plan is intended to provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council with the information and data that is necessary to assess the merits of development in the SP-2, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, I-2 and I-2 districts. Approval of a Concept Plan shall be required in connection with any request for zoning to any SF- 30, SF-20A, SF-20B, SP-2, B-1, B-2, and HC zoning slake\480-c.ord(32891) -40- districts, unless such zoning request is upon the application of the City. 41.2 APPLICATION - A written application for Concept Plan approval shall be filed with the Administrative Official on forms prepared by the City. The application shall be signed by the property owner and shall be accompanied by a sufficient number of copies (as determined by the Administrative Official) of all conceptual or graphical representations required herein, in a size sufficient to clearly show all information required, and a copy reduced to 8-1/2" x 1111, and two (2) copies of all written documents. 41.3 CONTENT OF CONCEPT PLAN - A Concept Plan shall include all of the following information in graphic representation or written documents as appropriate, and shall be prepared by a registered architect, registered engineer, registered surveyor, or a registered landscape architect: a. North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. b. Vicinity map indicating the area in which the property is located. C. Appropriate title, i.e., "CONCEPT PLAN FOR Zoning Request." d. Title includes project name, City, County, State. e. Title includes gross acreage and date of preparation. f. Provide name and address of owner and/or applicant. g. Provide name, address, and phone of consultant who prepared the plan. h. Legal description and a survey or plat certified by a registered professional land surveyor showing boundary dimensions, bearings, and existing easements. i. Label the existing zoning of the property, the existing land use, the proposed land use designation, and any proposed zoning. j. Adjacent tracts labeled with owners name, existing zoning and proposed land use designation (L.U.D.). slake\480-c.ord(32891) -41- k. Conceptual representation of proposed use(s) and generalized representation of proposed improvements. 1. Conceptual representation of points of connection to public rights -of -way. M. Approximate extent of existing tree cover. n. Label all required Bufferyards as to type and width. o. Computation of proposed number of dwelling units. P. Screening and landscaping plan shall be required where such treatment is essential to the proper arrangement of the development. Such plan when required should include screening walls, ornamental planting, lawns and gardens, playgrounds, and wooded areas that are to be retained. q. Other information the applicant and/or owner might wish to include. r. Such other information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff, Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council. 41.4 EFFECT OF CONCEPT PLAN - All subsequent site plans shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved with the zoning application. If, in the opinion of the Administrative Official, the site plan does not substantially conform to the Concept Plan approved by the City Council, the applicant shall either seek approval of the revised Concept Plan per Section 41 or a revised Site Plan per Section 40. Approval of these plans shall be within the authority of the City Council upon a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission." SECTION 49 That Section 43, Airport Overlay Zone, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsections 43.1 and 43.2, to read as follows: " 43.1 AIRPORT ZONING ORDINANCE - Certain areas of the City are or may be impacted by noise and other activities slake\480-c.ord(32891) _42_ associated with commercial aviation operations originating and terminating at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The impacted areas are shown on the Airport Overlay Zone Map attached to the Airport Compatible Lane Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 adopted by the City. In addition to the regulations set forth in this ordinance, development in these areas shall be subject to the regulations and restrictions set forth in the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance. 43.2 BUILDING PERMITS - No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any use within the Airport Overlay Zone unless such use is in compliance with the requirements of this ordinance and the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance." SECTION 50 That Section 44, Board of Adjustment, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by deleting Subsections 44.3(c) and 44.12 in their entirety. That Section 44, Board of Adjustment, is further amended by revising paragraph b. of Subsection 44.4 thereof, to read as follows: "b. In order to provide for such changes and contingencies, an interpretation of the ordinance as to whether or not such requested land use is covered or not by the existing ordinance shall be first made by the Administrative Official. The decision of the Administrative Official may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment, who shall consider the nature and characteristics of the proposed use and its compatibility with the uses permitted in various zoning districts, and determine in its opinion which zoning district or districts such use should be listed in, and shall so make its findings in writing." That Section 44, Board of Adjustment, is further amended by revising Subsections 44.6 and 44.7 thereof to read as follows: " 44.6 CONDITIONS OF VARIANCE - In granting any variance, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with this slake\480-c.ord(32891) -43- ordinance. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. Under no circumstances shall the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under the terms of this ordinance in the district involved or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this ordinance in said district. 44.7 VOTE - The concurring vote of four members of the Board shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Administrative Official, or to decide in favor of the applicant on any matter upon which the Board is required to pass under this ordinance, or to approve any variance." SECTION 51 That Section 45, Specific Use Permits, of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Subsection 45.1 thereof, to read as follows: " 45.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS - The uses listed in this section are prohibited in the City of Southlake unless and until a specific use permit is granted for such use by the City Council in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in this Section. A specific use permit shall be required for the following uses: SPECIFIC USE 1.Sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. Outdoor entertainment centers (including ball parks, miniature golf courses, golf driving ranges, batting cages, carnivals, archery ranges and similar uses). 3. Kennels 4. Portable buildings not otherwise permitted under this ordinance. (As amended by Ord. 480- A) slake\480-c.ord(32891) -44- DISTRICT WHERE PERMITTED 0-2, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, HC, S-P-1, S-P-2, PUD C-3, C-4, B-2, I-1, I-2 C-3, C-4, B-2, I-1 All except RE, SF- lA, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF- 1, MF-2, MH 5. Churches, synagogues, temples and other similar facilities for worship, fellowship and education, subject to the following conditions: a. The City Council shall impose such reasonable conditions as it deems necessary to protect the residential neighborhoods, in so far as practicable, from the detrimental effects of noise, traffic, fire, etc. and to protect the character of the neighborhood and the value of surrounding properties; b. In granting or denying such application, the City Council shall consider such items as the total land area to be devoted to the religious use, the size of the church structures and the congregation, the frequency of church services, other activities which take place on the premises, and the suitability of the property for residential use. The City Council shall consider all effects of such a facility, both beneficial and detrimental, and shall deny such application when the detrimental effects substantially outweigh the beneficial effects. C. Children's nurseries, child day care centers, and kindergartens may be approved as a part of the main or accessory religious building provided exterior instructional or play areas are suitably fenced from any adjacent street, parking area or property. 6. Public, semi-public and parochial/ private schools, not including correctional institutions or trade schools. 7. Public, semi-public and private golf courses together with related clubhouse, pro -shop and maintenance/ storage buildings, provided no building is closer than one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining side or rear property lines or closer than fifty (50) feet to a public street right-of-way line. 8. Equestrian riding stables, tack rooms, show rings, and rodeo grounds, either private or when operated as a business, provided adequate measures are employed to prevent health hazards to humans or animals, and adequate controls are used so as not to create offensive nuisances or odors. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -45- AG, RE, SF-1A, SF- 1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF- 1, MF-2 All except B-1, CS, HC, I-1 and I-2 AG, RE, SF-1A, SF- 1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, MF-2 and B-2 AG, I-2 9. Dude ranches catering to temporary guests housed on the premises 10. Colleges, junior colleges, or other similar institutions of higher learning, whether public or private, when located on a site of at least twenty (20) acres, and provided such facilities have direct access to a major thoroughfare street or highway and further provided that buildings and intensive use outdoor facilities are set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from all property lines. 11. Airports, aviation field or aircraft landing areas. 12. Marina or yacht club, whether private or public. 13. Community centers and service clubs dedicated to social or recreational activities serving the City or neighborhood thereof. Such buildings and facilities shall be set back at least thirty (30) feet from all side and rear property lines and forty (40) feet from any street line. The total ground floor area of all such buildings and structures shall not cover more than twenty-five (25) percent of the site area devoted to such facilities and activities. 14. Athletic stadiums, public or private, when located adjacent to a thoroughfare or collector street. 15. Fish hatcheries and fish farms. 16. Public governmental buildings including community health centers and recreation buildings, libraries, museums, postal stations, and administrative offices of federal or state government. 17. Servants or family quarters for domestic servants employed on the premises or family members of the owner of the premises and shall not be rented or otherwise used as a separate domicile provided the gross inhabitable square footage of the floor area shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. Such quarters may be housed within the principal residential dwelling, above a residential garage, or be part of an accessory building on the same premises, and shall comply with minimum standards for slake\480-c.ord(32891) -46- AG All except CS, I-1 and I-2 C-3 AG AG, RE, SF-1A, SF- 1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1 and MF- 2 AG, RE, SF-1A, SF- 1B, SF-30,SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, and MF-2 AG, I-2 All AG, RE, SF-1A, SF- 1B, SF-30 light, health, safety and occupancy in conformance with other applicable City Codes and Ordinances. If the quarters exist as a separate accessory building to the principal dwelling, such quarters must be located at a distance of at least thirty (30) feet behind the principal dwelling, or not be visible from the street; in addition, such quarters must share a common street access with the principal dwelling. All utilities must be on the same meter as the principal dwelling. A separate septic system from the principal dwelling is required if the quarters are housed other than in the principal dwelling. 13. Temporary real estate sales office, including manufactured housing, to be located on property being sold for a period of sale exceeding two (2) years. 19. Sales and service of new automobiles, trucks, or motorhomes. 20. Sales and service of used automobiles, trucks, or motorhomes. 21. Medical care facilities: nursing and care homes, hospitals, with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal services used, operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors when located on a site of not less than five (5) acres. 22. Helistop. 23. Cemetery Uses. a. Application. An application for a cemetery use must be in writing and shall include: (1) Name and address of applicant. (2) Location and legal description of proposed cemetery land. (3) Complete plan in conformity with the requirements of Development Plan herein provided. (4) Preliminary specifications of all buildings, improvements, utility installations and other facilities to be constructed on or under the land proposed for zoning change. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -47- All C-4, I-1 I-1 CS, C-1, C-2 CS, HC, 0-1, 0-2, I-1, I-2, B-2 CS (5) Such further reasonable information as may be required by the City Council. b. Development Plan - The cemetery shall conform to the following minimum requirements: (1) It shall be located on a well drained site, properly graded to insure rapid draining and freedom from stagnant pools of water. (2) All walkways and driveways within a cemetery shall be all weather, hard -surfaced. (3) When a public or community sewer system is available, sewer connections shall be installed as required by the local plumbing code. If the cemetery is not to be served immediately by a sewage collection system connected to a community treatment plant or to a public sewage facility, the occupancy of any building, residence or other structure shall be restricted until a septic tank and subsurface drainage field designed and constructed in accordance with methods and standards approved by the State Department of Health and the local plumbing code have been installed, inspected and approved by the City. If the permitted use is not to be served immediately by a water utility, occupancy shall be prohibited until water satisfactory for human consumption is available from a source on the land, or a public utility source, in adequate and sufficient supply for human use and operation of a septic tank and system. Individual water supplies must be in conformity to the local plumbing code. (4) All cemeteries must qualify and be maintained as a perpetual care center as provided in Article 912a, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, and any other applicable state laws. (5) The cemetery must comply with all building codes, including but not limited to plumbing, electrical, street, and general codes of the City of Southlake, Texas, or other applicable governmental authority. (6) All use of the surface land or underground, or buildings or structures of any type shall comply with all applicable City, County, State, Federal or other governmental slake\480-c.ord(32891) .48- agency requirements as to health, sanitation, ventilation, pollution and associated matters. C. Location - Any cemetery, or any portion of land designated for the use thereof, shall comply with the following minimum requirements as to location: (1) It shall conform to distance requirements of 912a-24, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, and such minimum distances shall be measured from the nearest city limit point of any city or cities (other than the City of Southlake, Texas) to the boundary of said cemetery land nearest to the city limit of the other city by direct line measurement. (2) It shall be located not less than five hundred (500) feet from any residence or structure used for living purposes or any well, creek, lake, tank, reservoir or pond, or other such water source or place of storage, passage, or drainage. d. Parking - All parking shall be off-street parking with an all-weather surface located in the rear or side yard next to buildings. There shall be one (1) parking space for each four (4) seats in any assembly portion of any building or structure. e. Screening and Fencing (1) All land actually used for buildings and/or burial spaces shall be completely enclosed in a fence with gates capable of being locked to prevent trespassers from entering said premises. (2) Any additional fencing, screening, walls, landscaping, or ornamental planting shall be installed if deemed necessary by the City Council in relation to the property itself or in relation to any adjoining property. 24. The City Council may authorize the 0-1, 0-2, I-1 establishment of retail operations in an amount exceeding fifteen (15) percent of the net square footage of any one office structure if said increase is the consolidation of retail space from a number of different office structures under common ownership for the purpose of achieving efficiency of use and cost economies. An example of this use would be found in a business park which might contain five separate office structures. A cafeteria or food service slake\480-c.ord(32891) -49- establishment to service all five structures might be located in one central structure under the common control, direction or plan of a common ownership and management group. The City Council shall be authorized to grant specific use permits to allow the consolidation of the fifteen (15) percent retail support sales activity, provided that the fifteen (15) percent maximum usage for retail sales limitation shall be maintained throughout an overall common project. 25. The erection and maintenance of antennas, satellite dishes, telecommunication facilities or towers in excess of maximum height regulations for this district where such structures are related to principal permitted uses occupying the structures to which they are attached or affixed. 26. Day nurseries or equivalent childcare facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex. If the City Council should choose to grant a specific use permit for this activity, the activity shall not be subject to or included within the fifteen (15) percent calculation for supporting retail services as outlined for other supporting retail activities. 27. The location of day nurseries or similar childcare activities, if said activity is clearly designed to support neighborhood requirements in the residential areas lying in close proximity to the specific use site. 28. studios designed for the practice, education or training in art, dance, music, drama, photo, or interior design. 29. Outdoor storage of plants or other greenery if conducted as a portion of the retail operations of another principal use permitted within this district. This specific use permit is designed to permit the City Council to allow limited outdoor garden sales activity in conjunction with traditional retail operations subject to the establishment of safeguards deemed necessary and appropriate to protect adjoining properties. In granting a specific use permit for this activity, the City Council is authorized to set out specialized buffering, screening, design and slake\480-c.ord(32891) -50- All O-2, B-1 C-1 C-1 C-2, C-3, C-4 and B-2 signage requirements to ensure that the outdoor storage, display and sale is totally compatible with the specific site and all surrounding land uses. 30. The City Council may permit the construction C-3 of residential units if they are constructed as a portion of a mixed use development within a single structure. This specific provision is designed and intended to allow the construction of studio or loft -type apartments or condominium living units on the floor or floors above office and retail -type activities situated on a ground floor. 31. A residential unit(s) for the exclusive use B-2, I-1 of an employee or employees of the principal use, placed upon the site when such employee(s) will be fulfilling the duties of night watchman or caretaker for the site. In approving the construction of a residential unit under this provision, the City Council may establish such terms and conditions as it deems necessary to protect the interest of the community at large, the business applicant and the future occupant of the residential structure. 32. Private airfields and aircraft landing area. CS, AG, C-3 33. veterinary clinics for large animal care, to I-1, I-2 include such restrictions as the City Council deems necessary for protecting adjacent properties from negative environmental impacts. 34. The construction of accessory buildings AG, MF-1, MF-2, or structures of a size or aggregate size greater SF-lA, SF-1B, than that permitted under the accessory building 30, SF-20A, requirements of the zoning district in which the SF-20B property lies. 35. Paper or metal processing and storage. I-2 36. Gravel crushing, screening and washing. I-2 37. Dyecasting manufacture. I-2 38. Concrete batching or transient mix plant. ALL 39. Concrete products manufacturing. I-2 40. Boiler making, repairing and boiler work. I-2 41. Asphalt storage, liquid or solid. I-2 42. Meat processing plants. I-2 slake\480-c.ord(32891) -51- SF- 43. Golf driving range. 44. Petroleum Operations. The City Council may grant this use as a specific use permit, subject to compliance with the following provisions: a. In granting or denying a use in this category, the City Council must bear in mind that these sites are not to be located contiguous to residentially zoned properties and should be located in such a manner as to preclude the necessity to travel through residentially zoned areas to reach these sites. Petroleum operations should never be placed in an environmentally sensitive area and should be allocated only to those areas appropriately supported by public utility infrastructure and major arterial thoroughfares. Environmental impacts of this use should be carefully considered in determining whether to grant or deny an application. b. The City Council may permit the following uses within this category. (1) On -site storage of petroleum products. (2) Pipe line transfer or servicing operations relating to the delivery of petroleum based products. (3) Petroleum distribution points of a wholesale nature designed to allow the loading or off-loading of truck facilities in a non -retail setting. (4) Petroleum blending operations. (5) Any or all other petroleum related uses which in the opinion of the City Council appear to be in character with the permitted uses for this district. C. No specific use permit shall be granted unless a developmental site plan as set forth in Section 27.6 is submitted to, and approved by, the City Council. 45. The City Council may authorize a waiver of the solid wall screen requirement for outdoor storage, only when such outdoor storage abuts a lot or tract zoned AG, and only when there is no residence on such lot or tract within five stake\480-c.ord(32891) -52- AG, C-3, C-4, I-1, I-2 I-2 hundred (500) feet of the storage area. The City Council has no authority to waive Section 38 Screening Requirements where the outdoor storage abuts properly zoned residential. The applicant requesting a waiver of screening requirements must submit a map to the City Council showing that the outside storage area is so situated that it will not be an eyesore, and is sufficiently distanced from any residences. 46. Community Health Centers. 47. Rodeo Grounds. 48. Outside storage, subject to the requirements of Section 38. A site plan is required. 49. Non-commercial radio and television receiving antennae and non-commercial radio transmitting antennae limited in height to sixty ( 6 0 ) feet ( measured from the ground line in front of the dwelling or use facing a public street), and further provided no electrical, radio or television signal interference is created which would adversely affect such signals, whether audio or visual, to nearby dwellings and other permitted uses. Any and all television satellite dishes shall be installed in the required rear yard in such a manner as to reduce or eliminate their visibility from all public rights -of -way. 50. Accessory buildings located in the front yard. 51. In -home daycare per state regulations. 52. In -home swimming lessons. 53. Gasoline filling station in conjunction with a convenience store. SECTION 52 All AG, I-2 I-1 AG, RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, MF-1, MF-2 SF-1A, SF-1B and RE RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF- 20B RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, and SF-20B C - 1 " This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the slake\480-c.ord(32891) -53- provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 53 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 54 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 55 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such slake\480-c.ord(32891) -54- ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 56 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 57 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 58 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. slake\480-c.ord(32891) -55- PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF . 1991. ly"N. - 7 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: slake\480-c.ord(32891) -56- City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M March 26, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Proposed Fire Code Amendments --------------------------------------------------------------- The six sections of the proposed Fire Code Amendments are areas that the Fire Chief and I feel a need to address immediately because of their various characteristics concerning existing policies and new construction. We feel the adoption of these amendments will clarify for all of those concerned the proper instructions that will be enforced by all City departments. Item 1 - Identification/protection of equipment Section 10.206 (B); Section 10.206 (C); Section 10.210 Sets policy on the painting and coding of fire hydrants, fire lanes, telephone jacks, etc., to provide uniformity which will facilitate ease of identification by incoming fire personnel. Item 2 - Fire apparatus access roads Section 10.207 (A through L); Appendix I Covers fire apparatus access to roads and entry to all properties, providing for exceptions, widths, clearances, turning radius, bridges, signs, etc. Item 3 - Automatic sprinkler systems and the occupancies affected Section 10.306 (C-1,D,H and I); Appendix II; Appendix III This covers anchor buildings, large restaurants, multi -family dwellings (3 or above). It also closes the gap between commercial and high rise packages. This section will help us when we become a key rate city by permitting minimal loss. We should be mindful that different codes interact with other codes and should be addressed simultaneously; i.e., if we don't adopt a sprinkler system but we adopt a fire alarm code, we are providing for a warning but we are not providing for immediate fire protection and vice versa. Item 4 - Alarm systems and occupancies affected Section 14.104 (C&D) This covers elevators, fire panels and ensures that these alarms go to some sort of telephonic or radio communications. 91-/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Hawk Proposed Fire Code Amendments March 26, 1991 Page 2 Item 5 - Combustible materials stored at construction sites Section 87.103 (Q) Due to the increase in construction that we will see in Southlake in the next several years, we feel that this is a health and safety measure that will protect the contractor's materials and will aid both fire and police. Item 6 - Combustible roof coverings Article 88; Appendix IV This section will provide for wood shingle roofing that meets a proper criteria that has been established by the Cedar, Shake and Shingle Bureau for fire retardedness. It should be noted that we are providing for wood shingle roofing that may be purchased within the confines of the City limits of Southlake. BC/mr IV -a CODE AMENDMENTS FOR UFC 1988 The following are priority revisions to the 1988 Uniform Fire Code. ITEM 1 SECTION 10.206 (B) Current - (b) Identification of Hydrants or Equipment. All fire protection equipment or hydrants shall be clearly identified in a manner approved by the chief to prevent parking or other obstruction. Proposed - (b) Identification of Hydrants or Equipment. All fire protection equipment or hydrants shall be clearly identified in a manner approved by the Chief to prevent parking or other obstruction. All new hydrants that are installed within the corporate city limits of the City of Southlake shall be painted red with a white reflective bonnet and discharge caps. An approved blue reflector shall be placed in the roadway in a manner approved by the Fire Chief. Explanation - The changes proposed will define the manner in which the fire hydrants will be painted and marked. It will not eliminate the ability of the City to address other items of identification of fire equipment as currently provided in the code. ITEM 1 SECTION 10.206 (C) Current - Currently there is not a section 10.206 (c) Proposed - (c) Fire Zones. When the authority having jurisdiction determines that an area is necessary to gain immediate access to any fire protection equipment, appliance, hydrant or to gain access for fire service entry to the building or area for the purpose of life safety, the area shall be marked or posted as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. Explanation - The intent of this proposed change is to eliminate any access problems into areas of the buildings and into control access areas such as low water crossings or private gates. This section is also a portion of the proposed changes for high-rise protection. !11-3 Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 2 ITEM 2 SECTION 10.207 (A THROUGH L) Currently - (a) General. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this section. (b) Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every building hereafter constructed when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story is located more than 150 feet from fire department vehicle access. Exceptions: 1. When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section may be modified. 2. When access roadways cannot be installed due to topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, the chief may require additional fire protection as specified in Section 10.301 (b). 3. When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3 or Group M Occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the opinion of the chief, fire -fighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. For high -piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. (c) Width. The unobstructured width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. (d) Vertical Clearance. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Exception: Upon approval vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such reduction does Y"7 Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 3 not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance. (e) Permissible Modifications. Vertical clearances or widths required by this section shall be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. (f) Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. (g) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved by the chief. (h) Turnarounds. All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. (i) Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code and using designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed roads of fire apparatus. (j) Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed the maximum approved by the chief. (k) Obstruction. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. (1) Signs. When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Proposed - Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code is hereby amended in subsections (b), (c), (e), (h), and l I— $' Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 4 the addition of subsection (m), and shall be and read as follows: (b) Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every structure. Such roadway or emergency easement shall provide for all portions of the first story of a structure to be within one hundred and fifty (1501) feet of a fire apparatus located within said access roadway or easement. Where access requirements cannot be fully provided, recognized fire protection systems shall be installed as prescribed and approved by the authority having jurisdiction. More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. For high - piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. Explanation - The intent of this change is to (W require that access be provided to all structures, regardless of the addition of fire protection systems. This will insure that all other emergency services (EMS and Police services), as well as Fire services has this access. The change is thus accomplished by modifying the exception granted under this subsection. An additional item of correction is that the change will allow the Fire Services to require a protection system or other improvements in this area if the property prohibits such access routes due to topography, etc. Other items covered in this subsection remain unchanged. (c) Width. The minimum unobstructed width of fire apparatus access roadways shall be not less than 20 feet, 24 feet when located within 35 feet of any structure in excess of 30 feet in height. The authority having jurisdiction may increase widths when deemed necessary to provide adequate access for protection. Explanation - The intent of this change is to widen the fire access roads to allow for the use of the aerial apparatus and still allow proper access by additional emergency traffic. An added benefit of this change is that the height requirements that Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 5 warrant changes in the width, will allow greater protection from possible structural collapse in the event of a fire by moving personnel and equipment to a safer distance. (e) Permissible Modification. Clearances or widths required by this subsection may be granted as a variance when, in the opinion of the chief, such variances provides a minimum width that is adequate to provide fire apparatus access. For high - piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. Explanation - The intent of this change is to allow the option to exist for variances. The variances may be required in high hazard areas (chemical plants or storage facilities) as well as in high rise occupancies. They may, also, be granted to allow for the reduction in the fire access road requirements in areas such as private park access roads or in remote utility facilities access easements. (g) Turging Radius. The turning radius of a fire (W apparatus access roadway shall be set and approved by the Chief. Unless.otherwise stipulated, each access roadway shall have a twenty-five (251) feet inside dimension, and not less than fifty (501) feet outside dimension. Explanation - The definition of the turning radius is the change in this subsection. The definition is based upon the required turning radius of the Fire Services engines and aerial apparatus. (h) Turnarounds. Any such easement more than one length shall either be dedicated public street provided with an all we with a turning radius o feet. roadway or emergency access hundred fifty (1501) feet in connected to another or fire lane easement, or ather surface turnaround f no less than fifty (501) Explanation - The intent of this change is to allow for continuous access and egress into an area. Please review the Appendix I - Definition of an All Weather Surface, and the corresponding staff recommendations for construction of both permanent and temporary turnarounds. Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 6 (m) Speed Bumps. No person, firm or corporation shall place, construct, erect or maintain any speed bumps in a marked fire lane, fire zone or emergency access easement without first obtaining approval from the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Such speed bumps shall be constructed as not to exceed the height of five (511) inches and a rise at the ratio of two (2) to one (1). Explanation - The intent of this subsection change is to define how speed bumps will be constructed and that they must receive approval prior to such construction. The intent of the definition is to allow the construction of such speed bumps, but to see that they are not a traffic hazard by the method in which they are constructed. ITEM 1 SECTION 10.210 Current - Currently there is not a Section 10.210 Proposed - Keys, labels and signage necessary for the (W operation and use of required fire protection equipment and other emergency systems shall be provided as requested by the chief or his authorized representative. Explanation - The intent of this addition to the code is to allow the Fire Services to require that items deemed necessary for public safety, access by the Fire Service, or identification of safety equipment or devices, be properly identified. For example, a valve in a sprinkler system placed in the system to allow a portion of that system to be isolate from the rest, shall be properly identified so that fire personnel can quickly locate and reduce possible water damage. ITEM 3 SECTION 10.306 (C 1, D, H, and I) Current - (c 1.) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking establishments. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unseparated accessory uses where the total area of such unseparated rooms and assembly uses exceeds 5000 square feet. For Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 7 uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall be not less than as required for a one -hour occupancy separation. The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at least a one -hour occupancy separation. Proposed - (c 1.) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking establishments. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies used for drinking, dancing or dining, when the total occupancy area exceeds 5,000 square feet in area, regardless of area wall separations from other unseparated rooms or area uses. Explanation - The intent of this change is to eliminate the use of separation walls in high occupancy establishments were the judgement of the individual may be impaired or minors may be present. By eliminating the separation walls, the option not to completely sprinkler these occupancies is no longer allowed. Current - (d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in retail sales rooms classed as Group B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds 12,000 square feet on any floor or 24,000 square feet on all floors or in Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancies more than three stories in height. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the areas where sprinklers are required. Proposed - Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies classed as Group B, Division 2, where floor areas exceeds 12,000 square feet on any floor or 24,000 square feet on all floors regardless of area separation walls or other allowable area increases allowed by the Uniform Building Code. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the areas where sprinklers are required. Explanation - The intent of this change is to eliminate the use of separation walls in the replacement of. sprinkler system as a means of fire protection. By doing so, the Fire Service intends to reduce the potential for large losses due to fire in relatively large business occupancies. The reduction of losses to such establishments will also reduce the City's loss in terms of insurance premiums, employers/employees put out of business and the following lost of tax dollars. Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 8 These establishments are typically larger stores, or anchors stores, for shopping centers. Portions of this change are applicable to the high-rise amendments and the change, also, will fill the void between the single story buildings and multi -story buildings (greater than three stories). Please see Appendix II - Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. Current - (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms. Residential or quick -response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. Proposed - (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every multi -family dwelling containing three (3) or more dwelling units, and every hotel containing 20 or more guest rooms. Residential or quick -response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and (W guest room portions of the building. Explanation - The intent of this change is to require sprinkler systems in all multi -family dwelling larger than duplexes located within the City. The change also eliminates the height requirements for the hotels, etc., thus requiring sprinkler protection in any such occupancy regardless of the height of the building. This change is very similar in purpose to the changes requested in the Group B, Division 2 Occupancies and is intended to fill the same needs in the area of residential occupancies as that change does in commercial/mercantile occupancies. Current - (i) Approved Automatic Extinguishing Systems. Currently there is not a subsection (i). Proposed - (i) Approved Automatic Extinguishing Systems. Approved automatic extinguishing systems shall be installed in all stories of multi -story buildings three (3) or more stories in height, excluding garages used solely as parking garages, without exception. Buildings three (3) stories or more in height shall have a hydraulically designed sprinkler system that meets all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code Section Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 9 1807 (c) as amended. Standpipes may be combined with sprinkler systems. Explanation - The intent of this change is to require that all buildings, three (3) or more stories, will be protected by automatic sprinkler systems. Also, such system shall be designed and engineered for that particular buildings needs based upon available water and the criteria outlined in the Uniform Building Code. Please see Appendix III - Uniform Building Code - Section 1807 (c). ITEM 4 SECTION 14.104 REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (C AND D) Current - (c) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. A manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed in apartment houses three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units and in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms. Exceptions: 1. A fire alarm system need not be installed in buildings not over two stories in height when all individual dwelling units and contiguous attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other and from public or common areas by at least one -hour fire -resistive occupancy separations and each individual dwelling unit or guest room has an exit direct to a public way, exit court or yard, exterior stairway or exterior exit balcony. 2. A separate fire alarm system need not be installed in buildings which are protected throughout by an approved supervised fire sprinkler system conforming to the Building Code and U.B.C. Standard No. 38-1 and having a local alarm to notify all occupants. Alarm systems for Group R, Division 1 Occupancies having interior corridors serving as a required exit for an occupant load of ten or more shall consist of not less than an approved and listed system -type smoke detector installed within such corridors in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. When activated, such Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 10 detectors shall initiate an alarm which is audible throughout the building. The fire alarm system for Group R, Division 1 Occupancies other than those specified above shall be provided with manual sending stations or equivalent alternate protection in location as required by the chief. An approved and listed system -type automatic heat detector shall be installed within common areas such as recreational rooms, laundry rooms and furnace rooms of buildings containing Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. The detectors shall be installed on the ceiling or wall as such rooms in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and , when activated, shall initiate an alarm which is audible throughout the building. Proposed - (c) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. A manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed in all multi -family dwelling containing three (3) or more dwelling units, and every hotel containing 20 or more guest rooms. The remaining portions of this subsection will not be changed. Explanation - The intent of this change is to make this subsection compatible with the sprinkler system requirements outlined in Section 10.306 (c). This change also becomes part of the high-rise requirements that would govern residential occupancies such as apartments and hotels. Current - (d) High-rise Office Buildings and Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. A fire alarm and communication system complying with the provisions of Section 1807 of the Building Code shall be installed in: A. Group B, Division 2 office buildings having floors used for human occupancy located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. B. Group R, Division 1 Occupancies having floors used for human occupancy located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. IV., / 2.- Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 11 Proposed - (d) High-rise Office Building and Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. A fire alarm and communications system complying with the provisions of Section 1807 of the Building Code shall be installed in: A. Group B, Division 2, office buildings having floors used for human occupancy located three or more stories above the lowest level of the fire service vehicle access. B. Group R, Division 1, occupancies having floors used for human occupancy located three or more stories above the lowest level of fire service vehicle access. C. All control functions necessary to the operation of the fire alarm system shall be routed through a single control panel or group of control panels and located in an accessible area as approved by the chief. Explanation - The intent of this change is to bring this (W subsection into line with the other change suggested for the sprinkler systems. The addition of subsection (c) is basically a house keeping process in that it requires the grouping of all alarm system panels in one location. This item will save time in the event of a fire in such occupancies. This is a portion of the code amendments that correspond with the all high-rise changes to the code. ITEM 4 SECTION 87.103 - FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION (Q) Current - (q) Material Storage. Currently there is not a subsection (q). Proposed - (q) Material Storage. The storage of combustible materials used for construction shall be located at a distance no greater than 100 feet from a dedicated public street or emergency access easement as outlined in section 10.207 of this code. Explanation - The intent of this change is maintain access to combustible building materials at construction sites by placing such materials within reach of fire hose carried on the fire apparatus. This distance will /fz,/ _:?o Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 12 be measured from the fire access road to the storage area located on the property. ITEM 6 ARTICLE 88. COMBUSTIBLE ROOF COVERINGS Current - Currently there is not an Article 88 - Combustible Roof Coverings. Proposed - Section 88.10 (a) Wood shingle roof covering as required by the Uniform Building Code, Section 34.02 (E), only a Type A roof with Class A shingle or shakes shall be allowed on any of the following : 1. Commercial Buildings 2. Multi -family Buildings. All Single Family Residential buildings shall have no less than a Type C roof with Class A shingles or shakes installed on them. All wood shingles and shakes shall be factory pressure fire retardant treated. Written proof must be submitted prior to installation on approved construction. Explanation - The intent of this change is not to eliminate the use of wood shingle or shakes, but to restrict the type of wood shingle or shakes and the method in which they are installed. The type required by this change will require factory pressure treated materials that has past the same testing (plus two additional test) that other roofing materials must pass for certification. Please see Appendix IV - Combustible Roof Coverings Test Procedures. Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 13 ITEM 2 APPENDIX I - DEFINITION OF ALL WEATHER SURFACE The only definition of an all weather surface is found in the Zoning Ordinances for the City of Southlake in Section 4 - Definitions. The definition states: All Weather Surface - A dust free surface constructed of cement, asphalt, brick, or other commonly accepted pavement which may be approved by the Administration Official. From meetings that Public Works and the Fire Services has had concerning the amendments to the Building and Fire Codes, the following clarifications of the all weather surface was agree upon. The clarifications define an all weather surface as being: Fire Lanes 5" Concrete with #3 rebar on 18" centers over a 6" stabilized base or, 5" Asphalt over 6" stabilized base Parking Lots 2" Type D asphalt over 6" base material to 95 per cent standard proctor density or, 5" Concrete over 6" base material to 95 per cent standard proctor density Drive Approach 6" of 300 PSI concrete with #3 rebar on 18" centers both ways on chairs Temporary Turnarounds Temporary Turnarounds shall be constructed of 2" asphalt over 6" stabilized base. All other features shall comply with Section 10.207 (h) of the Uniform Fire Code as amended. Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 14 ITEM 3 APPENDIX II - GROUP B, DIVISION 2 OCCUPANCIES The following information pertains to Chapter 7 -Requirements for Group B Occupancies as defined in the Uniform Building Code. Group B Occupancies Defined Sec.701. Group B Occupancies shall be: Division 2. Drinking and dining establishments having an occupant load of less than 50, wholesale and retail stores, office buildings, printing plants, municipal police and fire stations, factories and workshops using materials not highly flammable or combustible, storage and sales rooms for combustible goods, paint stores without bulk handling. (See Section 402 for definition of assembly buildings.) Buildings or portions of buildings having rooms used for educational purposes beyond the 12th grade with less (W than 50 occupants in any room. The above occupancies exist in Group B, Division 2, and are the subject of a code amendment to the Uniform Fire Code, Section 10.306 (d). The amendment, however, only applies to those occupancies where floor areas exceeds 12,000 square feet on any floor or 24,000 square feet on all floors. 141- 1G Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 15 ITEM 3 APPENDIX III - UNIFORM BUILDING CODE - SECTION 1807 (C) This Section of the Uniform Building Code is the section titled "Special Provisions for Group B, Division 2 Office Buildings and Group R, Division 1 Occupancies". The subsection (c) which is the scope of the amendment in the Uniform Fire Code, Section 10.306 (i), covering approved automatic extinguishing systems and their installation in all buildings three (3) stories or more. Subsection (c) Automatic Sprinkler System. 1. System Design. The automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout the building. The sprinkler system shall be designed using the parameters set forth in U.B.C. Standard No. 38-1 and the following: Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page A. Shutoff valves and a water -flow device shall be provided for each floor. The sprinkler riser may be combined with the standpipe riser. B. In Seismic Zones No.2, No.3 and No.4, in addition to the main water supply, a secondary on -site supply of water equal to the hydraulically calculated sprinkler design demand plus 100 gallons per minute additional for the total standpipe system shall be provided. This supply shall be automatically available if the principal supply fails and shall have a duration of 30 minutes. 2. Modifications. The following modifications of code requirements are permitted: A. The fire -resistive time periods set forth in Table No. 17-A may be reduced by one hour for interior bearing walls, exterior bearing and nonbearing walls, roofs and the beams supporting roofs, provided they do not frame into columns. Vertical shafts other than stairway enclosures and elevator shafts may be reduced to one hour when sprinklers are installed within the shafts at alternate floors. The fire -resistive time period reduction as specified herein shall not apply to exterior bearing and nonbearing walls whose fire -resistive rating has /V-/ I Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 16 Appendix III (continued) already been reduced under the exceptions contained within Section 1803 (a) or 1903 (a). B. Except for corridors in Group B, Division 2 and Group R, Division 1 Occupancies and partitions separating dwelling units or guest rooms, all interior nonbearing partitions required to be one - hour fire -resistive construction by Table No. 17-A may be of noncombustible construction without a fire -resistive time period. C. Fixed tempered glass may be used in lieu of openable panels for smoke -control purposes. D. Travel distance from the most remote point in the floor area to a horizontal exit or to an enclosed stairway may be 300 feet. E. Fire dampers, other than those needed to protect floor -ceiling assemblies to maintain the fire resistance of the assembly, are not required. F. Emergency windows required by Section 1204 are not required. The installation of the automatic sprinkler system allows the builder to "trade off" some required built in construction features designed to reduce the spread of fire when such a system is installed. The automatic sprinkler system is designed to detect and begin extinguishment of the fire, at its origin, within a matter of minutes. Thus, reducing the risk to the occupants and damage to the structure. 6/-- / g 0 Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 17 ITEM 6 APPENDIX IV - COMBUSTIBLE ROOF COVERINGS The following information was supplied to the Fire Service and Building Inspection Department by Mr. J.T. (Tom) Seely of the Cedar Shake and Shingle Bureau. The information provided by Mr. Seely is the information that the amendment, Article 88 -Combustible Roof Coverings, is based upon. Fire Retardant Cedar Shakes and Shingles Identification - The CERTI-GUARD label identifies cedar shakes and shingles which have been pressure -impregnated with fire -retardant polymers to provide permanent fire protection. Class C shakes and shingles are identified by their blue Certi-Guard label. Class B shakes and shingles are identified by their red Certi-Guard label. (W Class C and B labels must identify the treating company, the independent testing laboratory, and the building code research number. Material - Certi-Guard is manufactured from #1 grade Certi-Split cedar shakes, #1 grade Certigrade cedar shingles, of #1 grade Certi-Sawn cedar shakes. Application - Class C Rated Roof: Class C rated shakes or shingles shall be placed over spaced or solid sheathing. Class B Rated Roof: Class B rated shakes or shingles shall be placed over a minimum 1/2" solid sheathing. Class A Rated Roof: Class B rated shakes shall be applied over a roof deck assembly consisting of a minimum 1/2" thick water-resistant gypsum board, applied to spaced or 1/2" solid sheathing. A layer of spaced or 1/2" solid sheathing is then applied over the gypsum sheathing, to which the Class B shakes are applied. Test Standards: ASTM E - 108, UL - 790, NFPA - 256, UBC Standard 32 - 7. / 14-17 n Code Amendments for UFC 1988 Page 18 (w Appendix IV (continued) Test Performed for Certification: 1. Intermittent - Flame Test 2. Burning Brand Test 3. Rain Test * 4. Spread - Of - Flame Test 5. Flying Brand Test 6. Weathering Test * After the rain test and each weathering test period, the shakes and shingles are again subjected to the Intermittent Flame, Burning - Brand and Flying Brand tests. 0 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 pny MANAGER cna -�r TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Cheatham Contract - F.M. 1709 Utility Relocation ------------------------------------------------------------- In the original contract with Cheatham & Associates for the design of the relocation of utilities along F.M. 1709, the limits of the contract were from Pearson Lane to S.H. 114. Since the original contract was executed, two additional areas need to be added to Cheatham's contract. The first area to be added to the design contract is to connect to Grapevine's water system for emergency water supply in order to provide fire protection to the Texas National Bank and Kinder Care buildings during construction. An interlocal agreement between the two cities has been approved by both cities. The proposed engineering design and surveying fee for this area from Cheatham & Associates is $3,500.00. The second area that needs to be added is along F.M. 1938 from the city limits to F.M. 1709. The Highway Department has requested that the utilities along F.M. 1938 be relocated because they are preparing to reconstruct F.M. 1938. Most water customers (24) south of F.M. 1709 along both sides of F.M. 1938 are being served by Keller. Keller staff has approached Southlake staff and has proposed that if Southlake will relocate the water lines along F.M. 1938, Keller would not expect reimbursement for these customers. Since these customers are Southlake residents, it seems prudent for the City of Southlake to serve their citizens. The City Attorney is preparing an interlocal agreement between Keller and Southlake to allow Southlake to serve these customers, provided Southlake will fund and relocate the water lines along F.M. 1938 without having to reimburse Keller for those customers. The proposed engineering design and surveying fee from Cheatham & Associates for the second area is $9,950. .01 City of Southlake, Texas r The total additional engineering design and surveying fee for both areas is $13,450. Below is the proposed allocation of those charges: Original Contract Additional Charges Revised Contract Engineering $ 75,500 $ 9,400 $ 84,900 Surveying $ 26,500 $ 4,050 $ 30,550 $ 102,000 $ 13,450 $ 115,450 Therefore, Staff recommends that Cheatham & Associates' contract for the relocation of utilities along F.M. 1709 be revised from $102,000 to $115,450. Please place this item on the next Council's agenda for consideration. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact me. M 1Y MHB/lc 's- City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 28, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Southlake Hills Final Plats, Phases I & II One -Year Extension Request ------------------------------------------------------------- Attached please find a copy of a letter from John Levitt on behalf of Dale Poe Development Corporation requesting an extension of the Final Plats of Southlake Hills, Phases I and II. Both phases were approved by the City Council on April 3, 1990. I have also attached a copy of Section 4.01(I)(3) from the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 regarding such extension. Should the City Council decide to grant the request, a vote to approve the extension needs to be reflected in the meeting minutes of the City Council. 0- KPG Attachments (2) , JOHN E. L.EVITT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS 726 COMMERCE • SUITE 104 • SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 • (817) 488-3313 March 27, 1991 Mrs. Karen Gandy City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Southlake Hills - Phase I & II Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Dear Karen: On behalf of our client, Dale Poe Development Company, Dallas, Texas, we respectfully request a one year extension of approval for the final plats of Southlake Hills, Phase I and II. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. (W Very Muly your , Jo n E. Levitt, P.E. :dl cc: Sammie Poe, Dale Poe Development 1&-2, 2. Special Filings: In the event that a special filing with the County is requested by the applicant, a check payable to the City of Southlake shall be submitted to the City Secretary in the amount of the appropriate fee and expenses. Fees for special filings of plats shall be set by resolution of the City Council. 3. Two -County Plats: In the event that a plat encompasses land that is within both Denton and Tarrant Counties,. an additional fee will be charged sufficient to cover the additional filing costs and expenses of filing in both counties. 4. Request not to File: Should the applicant decide to direct the City not to file the approved plat, a letter must be submitted to the City from the applicant prior to the City filing the plat requesting that the plat not be filed in the County Plat Records. I. Mcpiration of ' Plats: 1. Preliminary Plat:' A Preliminary Plat shall expire-twd years from the date of approval. Said expiration date shall be extended one year from the latest date of filing a Final Plat on a portion of said Preliminary Plat in the County Plat Records. 2. All other plats:, A Final Plat, Plat Revision, Amended Plat or a Plat Showing which has not been recorded in the County Plat Records within one'=year of the date df approval shall expire. 3.� Extensions: The City Council may extend the expiration date of an approved plat upon written petition for such extension by the owner prior to the expiration of the plat but not to exceed one (1) year. 4. Resubmittal: upon the expiration of a plat, the applicant must proceed through the applicable process in its entirety, to include fee submittal and the review process. 5. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to monitor the timing of the plat and the potential for expiration. Section 4.02 Preliminary Plat. Processinc: A. The Preliminary Plat will be scheduled for consideration on' the first available Planning and Zoning Commission agenda as determined by the date of acceptance for review and the calendar schedule adopted by the City. 1G 3 CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M March 27, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PREPARE CITY THOROUGHFARE PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------- Cheatham & Associates, at the direction of the Council, has prepared a scope of services proposal for a City Thoroughfare Plan for the City of Southlake. Attached is a copy of the proposal outlining the scope of work. Cheatham & Associates is planning to subcontract the traffic engineering work to a traffic engineering consultant. Cheatham & Associates has interviewed several traffic consultants and is recommending Hatchell & Associates to perform the traffic engineering work. Attached is a copy of a resume for Hatchell & Associates. Staff has met with and assisted the consultants in the development of the scope of services with the consultants and agree with the scope of work submitted. Generally, the narrative report and thoroughfare map produced by this plan will recommend typical cross sections of streets that will be required in a given right-of-way, the street classification of all collector streets in the City, the right-of-way width that will be required with each street classification and the reasons for making those decisions. It is anticipated that the Council may want to appoint a Thoroughfare Plan Committee to work with staff and consultants on this project. This Plan will be the foundation in determining street and right-of-way widths for the future of Southlake and is a much needed plan. Therefore, Staff would recommend that if the Council agrees with the scope of work submitted, the Council direct the Staff to contract with Cheatham & Associates for development of a C ty Thoroughfare Plan for a lump sum fee not to exceed $31,375 Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. MHB/lc attachment PROPOSAL FOR W&SNIM4161 31• THOROUGHFARE PLAN %'oZ [�J Prepare information regarding signalization of the major intersections Attached is a proposal from Jack Hatchell & Associates. It details traffic analysis and planning services proposed to be provided by him. (A resume is included.) City staff has requested that the traffic engineer be a subcontractor to our firm. His role will be primarily technical -- determining existing deficiencies, projecting needs for thoroughfares and developing a basic thoroughfare network. The 'basic inputs will be regional thoroughfare planning and the latest Southlake land use planning. Cheatham & Associates Scope of Services: Generally our firm will provide, furnish or prepare: 1. The graphic services necessary to prepare the thoroughfare plan map(s). 2. Writing and editing services to prepare an accompanying narrative. 3. Typical roadway and right-of-way sections for the various thoroughfare classifications. 4. Construction standards for the roadway sections. These will be alternative sections based on loads and soil conditions. 5. Basic liaison with a proposed thoroughfare planning advisory committee. 6. Basic background information to the traffic consultant. 7. Construction cost estimates on a per -linear -foot basis for the various roadway sections 8. The final written document, including any required drawings and maps. 9. Recommended corrective measures for the various 'problem' intersections. 10. Coordination with the traffic engineer to develop recommended R.O.W. widths for the thoroughfares. 2 /7-3 11. Recommendations regarding thoroughfare development regulations, roadway development amenities and corridor controls. 12. Coordination of information for the traffic engineer's effort to insure that planning by adjacent cities and the State are taken into consideration. 13. Recommendations regarding administrative matters affecting thoroughfare development, such as parking regulations and R.O.W. acquisition. 14. The drafting services and drawing the proposed thoroughfare plan graphic. We will furnish as an end product, a mylar reproducible (for making blueline copies) and 25 blueline copies of the final map. 15. Assistance in conducting public meetings or hearings on the planning activities. 16. Assistance with review of interim planning products with city staff before the public hearing. We will revise the draft products based on the public hearing, staff comments, P&Z comments and comments from the City Council. We will insure that the products produced by this effort can be utilized by any future roadway impact fee development. (W Sequence and Scheduling: We estimate the thoroughfare planning process to take about six to nine months, depending on the extent of public participation, review and resolution of conflicting matters. We believe the following will be the sequence of activities. 1. We recommend that an ad hoc Thoroughfare Planning Advisory Committee be appointed. The purpose of the body would be to act as a cross-section of the community. It will initially furnish the consultants with community -based thoroughfare issues. Secondly, it will act as an unofficial reviewing agency for the draft elements of the planning process. Finally, it may chose to act as a spokesman for parts of the planning products. 3 7- y It may consist of such appointees as members of the City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission, city staff, Chamber of Commerce or other economic development interests, Carroll ISD board members or staff, at -large citizens. The committee would be briefed on the goals of the planning process and their role as cross -sectional reviewing body. Their first assignment will be to develop a listing of local thoroughfare issues. 2. Data from the highway department, regional and local agencies should be reviewed. A meeting with the advisory committee should be conducted on community issues. The traffic consultant will make arrangement to utilize regional computerized traffic planning facilities. 3. The traffic consultant will develop the draft basic thoroughfare network. Cheatham & Assoc. will determine current status of FM 1938 extension as this corridor will play a major part in the basic network. 4. The draft network should be reviewed by the advisory committee at this point. 5. The traffic consultant will then develop traffic projections for the target year. If required by the projections, the network will be modified to accommodate the projected traffic. A draft narrative will be prepared discussing the traffic projection findings and recommendations. 6. Roadway sections, definitions will be developed. Recommendations for construction sequencing as it relates to thoroughfare development will be prepared. Combining the proposed sections and the results of the traffic projections, a draft thoroughfare plan will be developed. 4 1?",5- 7. This draft should then be reviewed by the city staff and the advisory committee. The draft should be submitted to the City Council for their approval. We recommend conducting a public hearing on the thoroughfare plan. 8. A final plan narrative (to include information from tasks listed below) and final plan graphics will then be prepared. Draft construction standards will be prepared. The per -linear -foot construction cost estimates will be prepared. , Cost estimates on specific 'bond issue' streets will be prepared. Recommendations for increased traffic handling (i.e., turning lanes etc.) will be prepared. Recommendations for removing short off -sets or other traffic handling adversities of the existing network will be prepared. 9. A final review by the staff, the advisory committee and City Council should be conducted. 10. The consultants will then complete final editing, have the materials printed and delivered. Products Furnished: Thoroughfare Plan Map - We will furnish a reproducible mylar (1" = 10001) and 25 blue line copies , Network Map - We will furnish a reproducible mylar (1" = 10001) and five blueline copies of the network with projected traffic counts. Accompanying Narrative and Drawings - We will furnish one 'original' (for subsequent copying) and 25 bound copies of the final report. The report will contain findings and recommendations regarding the thoroughfare system, roadway classifications, intersection treatment, cost estimates, and other recommendations as stated in the scope of services. [Upon request, we can prepare and furnish an executive summary document at the cost of preparation and printing.] _ 5 1 7, 6 Additional Alternative: Members of the Council and city staff have indicated the necessity of 'getting started' establishing a computer mapping system and GIS (geographical information system) for the city. A full narrative on this subject is far beyond the scope of this document. We do offer some very basic comments and recommendations. An early task for an agency, like the City of Southlake, is getting basic mapping information digitized for computer manipulation. It is our understanding that the equipment costs, training costs, additional personnel time and data entry costs required to start-up a computer mapping and GIS program are far beyond the city's current budget. We have been asked by the city staff to make some suggestions about how the city might begin to preserve information in digital files that can later be used by a city owned and operated computer mapping and GIS system. We trust the following information is helpful. Most computer mapping and GIS software systems 'read' common denominator 'DXF' (drawing exchange file) stored files. Thus, practically any computer mapping or GIS system hardware and software purchased by the city could read DXF files. At the staff's suggestion, we offer for consideration the following: Cheatham & Associates will assist in creating DXF files of the city's base mapping. We will base this mapping on Tarrant Appraisal District computer mapping information. The Southlake area consists of about 45 TAD maps. We will create a 'test' with one of the TAD maps for the city's review. The 'test' will be at no cost. We will then negotiate a fee for creating DXF files for each section of the base map. Later in the thoroughfare planning process, our firm can furnish a quote to create a computer mapping layer or layers of the thoroughfare plan (and any other desired information) filed in DXF format. This basic mapping information can then be used in true GIS applications at a later date. C. 7f We estimate 'the fees for the above scope of services to be: Principal Engineer 40 hrs x $90.00= $ 3,600.00 Staff Engineer 120 hrs x $65.00= $ 7,800.00 Certified Planner 90 hrs x $67.50= $ 6t075.00 Drafting Technician 80 hrs x $40.00= $ 3#200.00 Printing Expenses 1,100.00 Total Cheatham & Associates Fee $21,775.00 Jack Hatchell & Associates Fee $ 98600.00 Total Project Fee $31,375.00 The opportunity to participate in this project is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time, attention and most of all, your continuing confidence. Eddie Cheatham, P.E. Principal attch: Hatchell & Associates Proposal Hatchell & Associates Resume cc: Jack Hatchell 7 v• C11% ■MATCHELL d: ASSOVtNMS Piano. Texas 75026-oi.9 lY)NSCLTIXG E\(:1.VEEKIY4' (214) 424-1368 March 2, 1991 Mr. Mike Monroe, AICP Cheatham & Associates 1170 Corporate Drive West Suite 207 Arlington, Texas 76006 Dear Mike: Following our meeting with Mike Barnes on February 28 concerning a thoroughfare plan for the City of Southlake, I have prepared a revised Scope of Services for the project. The proposed Scope of Services uses traffic projections prepared by the North Central Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for the North Tarrant County study. I have visited with the Transportation Department of NCTCOG and feel comfortable that we can use their projections. My estimated fee includes the cost for additional traffic assignment work to be performed by NCTCOG to allow us.to identify and size the streets to be included in the thoroughfare plan. It is my understanding that the preparation of the thoroughfare plan will be coordinated with a committee appointed by the City Council. My fee proposal includes meetings with this committee during the course of the study. I look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Southlake and Cheatham & Associates in preparation of the Southlake Thoroughfare Plan. SCOPE OF SERVICES Jack Hatchell & Associates will work with Cheatham & Associates to prepare the thoroughfare plan for the City of Southlake. The scope of services for the portion of the work to be performed by Jack Hatchell & Associates is described below. Task 1. Meet with City Associates to revie collect information densities. of Southlake and Cheatham & w existing thoroughfare plan and concerning future land uses and 1 < ! - d ACK RIATCHELL a a1Stiil1( urt.s Page 2 Task 2. Prepare base year traffic assignments using NCTCOG assignments prepared for the North Tarrant County study. Task 3. Assess existing roadway capacity deficiencies. a. Select with City the minimum acceptable level of service to use for roadway traffic capacity. .b. Identify capacity deficiencies for each segment of roadway. c. Identify improvements necessary to allow roadway to operate at an acceptable level of service. d. Discuss findings with City. e. Prepare memorandum documenting existing deficiencies and recommended improvements. Task 4. Prepare horizon year traffic forecasts. a. Based on 20 year projected population and employment by traffic zone, work with NCTCOG to (W prepare traffic assignments for roadway network. b. Review forecast results with City and Cheatham & Associates. Task 5. Work with Cheatham & Associates and City to define types of thoroughfares (i.e. freeway, principal arterial, mi. or arterial, collector) to be used in thoroughfare plan, right-of-way and roadway cross sections. a. Evaluate roadway deficiencies based on horizon • year traffic forecasts. b. Formulate roadway improvements necessary to accommodate horizon year traffic forecasts at an acceptable level of service. 2 .... .. •.�a r."W Page 3 Task 6. Prepare draft of Thoroughfare Plan. a. Prepare thoroughfare plan map which identifies general alignment and type for each designated thoroughfare. b. Prepare typical cross sections and right-of-way requirements for each type of thoroughfare. c. Prepare brief narrative to accompany thoroughfare plan. Task 7. Present draft of Thoroughfare Plan to Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. a. Distribute copies of draft of thoroughfare plan to members of Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council for review. b. Conduct joint work session with Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to present and receive comment on proposed thoroughfare plan. It is recommended that this joint meeting be conducted as a public hearing to receive comments from property owners. Task S. Prepare final Thoroughfare Plan. a. Based on comments received in work session described in Task 7. b., revise thoroughfare plan, if necessary, to reflect any approved changes. b. Prepare and publish final thoroughfare plan. The preparation of all drawings and the thoroughfare plan itself and final publication of the thoroughfare plan will be accomplished by Cheatham & Associates. ESTIMATED FEE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT The estimated fee for completing Tasks 1 through 8 above is $9,600. This estimated fee includes services to be provided by NCTCOG which are estimated to be $3,600. Invoices will be 3 7 — // Page 4 submitted monthly and receipt by the client. blip are due within 30 days following I an prepared to initiate work on this assignment immediately following receipt of an executed copy of this proposal. It is estimated that the project can be completed within four months following receipt of an executed agreement. I sincerely appreciate -the opportunity to submit this proposal and would look forward to working with you and the City of Southlake. Thank you and the City of Southlake for providing me this opportunity. Sincerely, �J�k Hatcchhell, P.E. 4 ACCEPTED AND APPROVED Signature Typed Name AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR 7- is Date JACK HATCHELL & ASSOCIATES P.0.Box2"119 Consulting Engineering Plan*,Ters7502&0119 (214) 424-Da PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Traffic Impact Studies * Zoning Assistance * Traffic Circulation * Thoroughfare Planning Jack Hatchell * Traffic Signal Design * Parldng Design * Traffic Access Design * Traffic Operations EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering, Texas A & M University M.S. Civil Engineering (Traffic and Transportation), Texas A & M University REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer, Texas EXPERIENCE Jack Hatchell & Associates Vice President, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Vice President, PAWA, Inc. Traffic Engineer, City of Midland, Texas Engineering Assistant, Texas Highway Department C. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS 1990 1982 - 90 1970 - 82 1965 - 70 1961- 65 Traj7c Impact Studies to support zoning. Directed 100 plus such studies in Dallas/Fort Worth area to include Plano (25 plus), Dallas, Allen, Arlington, Frisco, Carrollton, Farmers Branch, Addison, Mesquite. Zoning Assistance to include meetings with city staff, planning and zoning commission, city council, neighborhood groups. Coordination of project team to include planners and other engineers. Formal presentations to planning and zoning commission and city council. Traffic Circulation and Parking Studies for Reunion Arena, Arts District, NorthPark Mall in Dallas, Texas; Midland, Texas CBD; Harris Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas. Preparation of Design Plans and Specifications for traffic sianal improvements counties range in for cities, ana the Mate Department of Highways and Public Transportation. These systems size from a single intersection to in excess of 125 intersections. Signal System Studies to include computerized traffic signal control for 15 cities. These stud- ies included traffic signal inventories, evaluation of existing signal control, alternatives analysis, benefit/cost analysis and recommendations. 7- i 3 JACK HATCHELL & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineering 92 Traffic Operations and Safety Studies for over 20 cities. These studies included sign, signal, and pavement marking inventories, accident analysis, traffic signal operations analysis, thor- oughfare plan evaluation, and access management. Traffic Signal Timing for 25 plus signal systems to include use of AAP, Transyt and Passer. Transportation Planning to include major thoroughfare plans, freeway alignment studies, and circulation plans for private developments. CIVIC ACTIVITIES Commissioner, Collin County, Texas 1987 - Present City Councilman and Mayor Pro Tem. City of Plano 1975 - 85 Member of Plano Planning and Zoning Commission 1974 - 75 Chairman, Plano Traffic Safety Support Commission 1973 - 74 Director, Plano YMCA Director, Plano Chamber of Commerce Allen Chamber of Commerce Richardson Chamber of Commerce PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers Texas Section, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Past President National Association of Counties, Member Transportation Steering Committee Texas Association of Counties 0 City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANAGER ` MEMORANDUM 13_0 , l March 26, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: RENOVATION OF CITY HALL BIDS Bids for the renovation of City Hall were opened and read aloud on Friday, March 22, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. Attached is a tabulation of those bids. The renovation contract calls for a base bid and four (4) alternate bids. The description of the base bid and alternate bids are as follows: Base Bid: Includes the complete renovation of the upper level open area (see attached drawings), stairway access for the upper level renovation, two windows for the City Manager's office, minor renovation of the lower level, and associated electrical and mechanical work for both lower and upper levels. Alternate #1: In the base bid only one restroom was included. This alternate adds an additional restroom. Alternate #2: Includes carpet for the dispatch, secretarial and captain's offices and the stairway. Alternate #3: Includes the purchase and installation of an emergency generator to include electrical panels and wiring. Alternate #4: Includes the electrical circuits and outlets that need to be connected to the emergency generator. The architects' original estimate (which includes Base Bid and Alternates 1 & 2) was $65,000 to $75,000. The low bid total from S.D. Peterson Construction Company for the Base Bid and Alternates 1 & 2 is $83,600. Given the complexity of the project, the low bid for these three items seems to be reasonable. Mel City of Southlake, Texas Alternates 3 & 4 were added to the project because they were budgeted and it appeared to be the most appropriate time to install the emergency power system. In the 1990-91 Budget, $11,100 was budgeted for an emergency generator. Based on the bids received and vendor information, it will take approximately $20,000 to re -bid, purchase, and install an emergency generator. The low bidder's bid for alternate #4 appears to be a reasonable bid and Staff would recommend to award that alternate bid if it is the Council's desire to purchase and install an emergency generator at a later date. The options to the Council for purchasinq and installinq the generator are as follows: 1. Reject alternate #3, budget next year for generator, and award alternate #4. 2. Reject alternate #3 and allocate $8,900 from the Infrastructure Reserve Account and direct Staff to re -bid generator and have it installed. 3. Reject alternate #3 and alternate #4 and don't install generator. 4. Award alternate #3 and #4 as bid. The low bidder, S.D. Peterson Construction, submitted several references for projects of similar size. Four of these references were questioned as to quality of work, completion time of project, willingness to work with owner and change order requests. Each reference gave excellent marks to the contractor on all four items and would recommend the contractor for future projects. Therefore, the Staff recommends that the low bidder, S.D. Peterson Construction, be awarded the following bids: 1. Base Bid @ $78,500 2. Alternate Bid No. 1 @ $3,600 3. Alternate Bid No. 2 @ $1,500 4. Alternate Bid No. 4 @ $3,400 Total Bid $87,000 It is also recommended by Staff that Council accept option 1 above, and that Alternate Bid No. 3 be rejected. Miry U1 JuuunaRc, icxas There remains approximately $30,400 from the $200,000 Contractual Obligation Bonds to fund the City Hall renovation project. If the Council awards the renovation contract to S.D. Peterson Construction as recommended, then approximately $65,300 would be needed from the Infrastructure Reserve Account to fund the project. The breakdown of the funding is as follows: $ 87,000 Renovation Project Cost 8,700 Contingencies $ 95,700 Total Monies to Fund Renovation Project (30,400) Remaining C.D. Funds $ 65,300 Monies to be Transferred from Infrastructure Reserve Account Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. M r{Ld MHB/lc 1g-3 a 0 4 V b .-i O d E. City of 5outmake, Texas 01 O O O In O Co O O O O it O E 0► 0% N 1- Cl Cn 0► N C► 01 -01 H H H rq 4.1 a 0 U O O O h O O O O N M 1- 0 N 1- V to w O -0 •-1 N V 1. H Co .-4 t0 M N N v %0 rl M V' In M 1- 0% V' N V %D N H M 9-1 C► N el N M V' %0 r% H 1-1 H H H 1-1 r1 H rl H r4 In O O In 1- O O O O 0 V O Id O P 0% V 0 O O ri 1- O V' 4j M O 0% M rl rl M N In Co LO r1 0 ► EI N 1- N to M O Co 1-1 O N M P O m m m O 01 O H N v v r-1 9.1 ri rl .-1 9-4 .-1 — V' O O In 'C7 O O O O M t` N to ft O O V +1 O O O ID %0 1- N ... V' O 04 m w M 01 V' 0% In V% i� O N O 0% N N IO .-1 V 1- z a — M O In 'p O O O O M 0% r► V' ft In P. -d O O O M M rl O -- r1 V im In O o e► In .l O O o 0+ .•1 V' N z •'1 N N N N N N N O O O 0% O O O O O O N 'It O O O M O O In O 0+ O In V In N H v i %o In h co O O H iI rl r1 N .l M rl .4 N .-1 M H a -- .-1 O O O M o O O O o% In Io N st o u1 0 0% O O o In o In 1- ►r %0 V' O (n O O O V O In at y1 M ri M V' M N N r1 M M M O O O to O O O O r N r O V In .-4 In w In O H 1- W In N N %o 1� 1- 1- co O M N O N P 1. r1 rl M 01 Io N V' !- Co Co Co 01 0• 0► 0% H N M H H VI O c r+ H d �l m H H C G H E m m 11 OH w c a o l U U 00 � U � 1 41 � � U O m 0 Im•1 0 O U U C a � U m C O O 41 b C E .0 U u1 H U a U 1-4 w m N :4 U -A -4 IO EH m a O O Co x 0 0 U (d ro �, --11 -0a - 14 z° v; E+ to z vi a a a z 3 O r1 .i N M V' In .-1 .-1 1-1 V -.1 11 m V m a W O C1 ro O 14 w m Id 10 G+ C -.i x 14 0 3 N i VEST I M JRT CLERK „ �I r* _ ELEC. 16 '?? VEST. 2 INTERVIEW BOOKING COURT FILES &--.: t ORRIDOR 3 RECORDS if a CITY ADMIN. r TLT. 3 _ LAB �t • 1� t CORRIDOR 4 11 EVIDENCE - R�'W : C�►iG: CITY M O R.: - CELL CELL CELL _ - - 9. wA if .PLANT ', -�-� .- i--- $,�C1CTl��: G'QAIGkiETfi ---? •��4a ��� �+� -�t�-G�aN--t �- --- . �.oa,� __ _. _ --- - - : ��-fit•-- � - - - � . -__ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE I/a" = I' 0" Q D. SECY, RECEPTION \'NeW_-CA MSPET � =� • (4LTCr mAYE 2 STO. CAPTAIN - POLICE CHIEF LINtiOP 26 4, OFFICE rr: o OK74:7WPALLW o - �•� .b OFFICE 2 N i � �2 • CO 1?0 ?� % r SC UAD AM. Lt SGT JAL #416 GOO, fake Ls J's ' AT L" o.WZ6 LEYtC. 'PLAM) ._ t.' e•-�'J. '� • 4UPPEW LEVELTLOOR- PLAN 5 C A L E te�BN _:, ••.:; =4• fir NEW" CONStRUCTI ON :_,: ` ._4i DOOR NO. (SEE SCHEDULE- SHEET 2) REhkbVE:EXi STIN G. ` ' i1 PLAN NOTE SYMBOL (NOTES -SHEET 1) hr-4 lolly UI JUUU 11CMU, I CRaa r, H, I Ll L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 2, 1991 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the March 19, 1991, City Council Meeting. 3. Mayor's Report. 4. City Manager's Report. 5. Public Forum. 6. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-01-A, 1st reading (ZA 91-02). Amending Ordinance No. 480-01, a zoning change request for eight (8) parcels of land to be added to the existing residential P.U.D. Ordinance No. 480-01, these parcels are described as follows: Parcel A: 9.011 acres of land out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2A3, and a portion of Lots 2 & 3 Spring Creek Acres. Parcel B: 8.771 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C1A. Parcel C: 8.298 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 8B, and 8C. Parcel D: 4.014 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6A. Parcel E: 2.810 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6F1. Parcel F: 1.047 acres out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 591, Tract 1B2. Parcel G: 10.68 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D3A, 2D4, 2D5, and 2D6. Parcel H: 31.518 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2G, 2H, 2J, and 211. The addition of these eight (8) tracts will increase the acreage of the project from the original 826.93 acres to 902.80 acres. Owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. All the tracts are zoned Agricultural with the exception of 2.978 acres which is Zoned SF-1. The requested zoning is for Residential P.U.D. Continuation of the Public Hearing. %'ILY UI JVULIIIdRC, I VACLA U P U 1 j [I L [1 City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page two 7. Consider: ZA 91-03, Development Site Plan for Phases I & 2, Timarron (formerly known as Creekside). 165.1 acre tract out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Surveys, Abstract No. 1037, and 1038. Property owner is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Timarron Phase 1 & 2 are located east of South White Chapel Blvd., both North and South of East Continental Blvd. 8. Consider: ZA 91-04, Preliminary Plat of Timarron, Phase 1 & 2, a 165.1 acres out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. This plat includes 234 residential lots with 28.2 acres of open space. Owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 9. Consider: ZA 91-05, Preliminary Plat of Block 7, Lots 1 & 2, SouthView Addition, 4.937 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being a portion of Tracts 5 and 5A. Current zoning is Office-1. Location: North Carroll Avenue, across from Southlake City Hall. Owners: T.J. McHale; Applicant: United States Postal Service. 10. Consider: ZA 91-06, Final Plat of Block 7, Lot 1, SouthView Addition, being 1.002 acres out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. The property is located at the corner of Southcrest Lane and North Carroll Avenue, across from Southlake City Hall. Owners: T.J. McHale; Applicant: United States Postal Service. 11. Consider: ZA 91-07, Revised Preliminary Plat of SouthRidge Lakes. This plat encompasses 148.426 acres out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and the L.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partner, L.P. II. 12. Consider: ZA 91-08, Final Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III. A 18.282 acre tract of land out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. The property is zoned SF-20A. This final plat is a portion of the previously approved Phase III Final Plat. It represents thirty (30) lots North of Phase I and East of Peytonville Avenue. Owner: Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. Lilly UI JVUU IItUIG, IVAC20 L t Ci City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page three 13. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-C, 2nd reading. Amending the Zoning Ordinance. Continuation of the Public Hearing. 14. Consider: Ordinance No. 529, 1st reading. Amending Fire Code, Ordinance No. 470. 15. Consider: Addition to FM 1709 water line relocation project design contract. 16. Consider: One year extension of the Final Plats for Southlake Hills, Phases 1 & 2, previously granted approval on April 3, 1990. Owner/Developer: Dale Poe Development Corporation. 17. Consider: Proposal for professional services to prepare City Thoroughfare Plan. 18. Consider: Accepting low bid for the City Hall Renovation Project, and authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract. 19. Executive Session Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Section 2(e) 2(f) 2(g). Refer to posted list. A. Discussion: Pending or contemplated litigations. (Refer to posted list). B. Discussion: Personnel matters, including Boards and Commissions. (Refer to posted list). C. Discussion: Land Acquisition. D. Return to Open Session. 20. Consider: Action necessary in regards to pending or contemplated litigation. (Refer to posted list). 21. Consider: Action necessary in regards to personnel matters, including Boards and Commissions (Refer to posted list). 22. Consider: Action necessary in regards to land acquisition. filly UI OVU1111C1RC, 1 VACIb City Council Agenda April 2, 1991 page four 23. Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Thursday, March 28, 1991 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Opqn Meetings, Aft, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. ��r,�q�mnnnp,i H `A Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary moo? �` :a City of Southlake, Texas E r PERSONNEL D EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, Municipal Court Judge and City Boards and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions are on file in the City Secretary's Office. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City Council. PENDING LITIGATION The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Ray L. Whitmore, Louis Messina and Marie J. Robinson V. City of Southlake, 1980. 2. Russell Sivey v. City of Southlake. September, 1989. CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION 3. Essig Claim. February 1991. 4. Ginger Creek Estates. March 1991. 5. Margaret Freemen Claim. January, 1990. 6. West Beach Addition Litigation is, by nature, an on -going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasion, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects, in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this City Council Meeting, an executive session will be held. SLL 3/28/91 A H I i� F P 1� N City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. Carroll Avenue REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 2, 1991 7:30 p.m. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor, Gary Fickes; Mayor Pro Tem Betty Springer. Members: Sally Hall, Rick Wilhelm, Jerry Farrier, W. Ralph Evans (arrived at 8:20 p.m.). CITY STAFF PRESENT: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager; Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety; Michael Barnes, Director of Public Works; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Greg Last, City Planner; Don Wilson, Fire Chief; Eddie Cheatham, City Engineer; Wayne Olson, City Attorney; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. INVOCATION: Councilmember Jerry Farrier. The Work Session was called to order at 6:30 p.m. where Councilmembers and staff present reviewed the agenda items for tonight's meeting. The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Gary Fickes. Agenda Item #2, Approval of the Minutes The Minutes 'of the Regular City Council meeting held on March 19, 1991, were approved as presented. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Hall Ayes: Wilhelm, Hall, Springer, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 4-0 vote Agenda Item #3, Mayor's Report Mayor Fickes announced that every year the city participates in the Tarrant County Volunteer of the Year Program. This year our winner is Debbie Baum, who is ill and could not be present tonight so next meeting we will honor her with a proclamation which will also proclaim April as Volunteer Month. The Mayor announced that the recycling contract with BFI has been signed and is scheduled to start in Southlake on April 22. Tomorrow the Public Works Director will be having a meeting with BFI and members of the Environmental Task Force in an effort to set up route scheduling. In regards to the Park Master Plan, a questionaire will be mailed to approximately 600 citizens, chosen at random, on the 2nd week in April. The Mayor encouraged everyone who gets a questionaire to please return it to the city. The information included in the form is very important to the city. n D City of Southlake, Texas City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page two Agenda Item #3, Continued Councilmember Rick Wilhelm commended the Cross Timber Hills Homeowners Association for the interest they have shown in their community by participating in a "Clean Up Campaign", a couple of weeks ago. Members of the association walked along Peytonville Avenue, from FM 1709 to Dove Road picking up trash left along the roadway. Councilmember Sally Hall reported that on March 27, she and the Mayor, with Dr. Annette Griffin, Superintendent of C.I.S.D.; Assistant Superintendent, Bill Branum; and, Judy Gilmore, School Board Member, went to Austin in regards to the State Education Tax Bill and the effect it would have on the citizens of Southlake and on the school district. She stated they saw a lot of people in a few hours and successfully, as the bill was not passed at this time. Mayor Fickes added that if the bill would have passed, it would have increased the Carroll I.S.D. tax rate from $1 .05 to $1.60 and he felt it would ruin a good school district. They met with a Tarrant County delegation, while there. He stated it was a very successful trip, however, the battle is not over. Mayor Pro Tem Springer stated in regards to the litter problems we are having in Southlake, she hopes that City Staff will concentrate on the area of North White Chapel Blvd. at SH 114. Springer referenced a letter which Council received today from Barbara Paty, North White Chapel Blvd., also in regard to litter in Southlake. Springer stated that the Southlake Business and Community Directories are here and available at the Chamber of Commerce office. The Mayor Pro Tem announced that the Annual Chamber of Commerce Candidates Forum will be held on April 25, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at Johnson Elementary School for those who wish to attend. On April 17, Leadership Southlake will be meeting at City Hall, beginning at 7:30 p.m. where members will be presenting their advocacy projects. The public is invited to attend. A meeting will be held on April 3, at 7:00 p.m. in regards to the Sister City Program and the trip to Toyoma Japan which is being planned for September, 1991. The meeting will be held in the office of Brad Bradley, on East Southlake Blvd. %illy Vi JVUU 11CMU, I GnaA i 1 l J t C City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page three nda Item #3, Continued Mayor Fickes announced that agenda item #8 and item #11 have been requested for tabling by the applicants. Agenda Item #4, City Manager's Report The City Manager, Curtis E. Hawk, noted that the sound system is not working properly tonight, and hopefully within the next couple of Council meetings, the system will be better as we are in the process of making some improvements to the system. Continental Park Subdivision is currently on sewer with some quality roads. The city has been working on this project for some time and we are happy to announce that it is now complete. Curtis Hawk stated that Tarrant County is finishing the work on Highland and will soon begin work in Summerplace Addition. Mr. Hawk also noted that the City's of Keller, Colleyville and Southlake have recently held joint meetings with City Manager's, Park Boards, and Fire and Police Departments, working on some of the issues which were presented during the joint dinner which was held last month. Councilmember Sally Hall noted that she has looked in Southlake for a Planned Cable Company office and has not found one. She stated that she is offended by the letter in the newspaper in regards to Planned Cable Company and the City. Councilmember Hall also noted that the condition of Mid Cities Ready Mix Company on Brumlow Avenue has worsened. She feels they have been dumping more debris on their property and asked the City Manager to please keep up with this problem. Mayor Fickes added that he has met with Mr. and Mrs. Stowe in regards to the dust being generated on Brumlow Avenue. He has written a letter to the companies on Brumlow and asked that they voluntarily take steps to correct the problem. Agenda Item #5, Public Forum Mayor Fickes announced that due to the fact that Agenda Item #11, Revised Preliminary Plat for SouthRidge Lakes Addition, has been requested for tabling, persons requesting to speak on that item will need to voice their comments during this time. Greg Jones, 1365 Cross Timber Drive, Southlake. Mr. Jones stated that he has several points to make against the proposed SouthRidge Lakes Blvd. being changed from four to two lanes. He noted that a petition was presented to the City Secretary on this date with 177 names of persons opposing this change. J lrRy Vi JVUu IIanG, I Gnaw i l 7 1� C City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page four Agenda Item #5, Continued Mr. Jones referenced several points, including: the Minutes of the February 5, City Council meeting where Councilmember Wilhelm stated that this issue cannot be looked at as an isolated situation; the schools; he feels the long time residents are not being considered in this instance; SouthRidge Lakes Blvd. being continued across FM 1709 to West Continental Blvd.; recent Bond Election and the fact that it failed should be an indication that the citizens don't want Peytonville to be widened; the Minutes of the February 5, City Council meeting where Councilmember Farrier stated he feels Arvida did a tremendous sales job to the community and now they are changing their plan; traffic lights on FM 1709; zoning in Arvida being under one/half acre. Mr. Jones stated that he feels the credibility of the Councilmembers is at stake and the citizens present are questioning a developer changing their plans in the middle of a project. Mayor Pro Tem Springer stated in response to Mr. Jones, that traffic lights are engineered to a specific site by the State Highway Department and cannot be moved; the zoning in Arvida is SF-20, which is 20,000 feet, just less than one/ half acre; and, the bond election did not address North Peytonville Avenue, only South Peytonville Avenue. Doug Brister, Rt 2 Box 326, Boyd, Texas. Mr. Brister was present representing the Sullivan Property, described as Tracts 2AlA, 2A1B, and 2A1 out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. Mr. Brister stated he feels the expansion of Peytonville will effect all the property surrounding the area and it should be looked at carefully. Councilmember Ralph Evans arrived at this time (8:20 p.m.). Chuck Ross, 1359 Cross Timber Drive, Southlake. Mr. Ross referenced the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting when this issue was before the commission. The P&Z Commission stated that whatever they do with this issue, they did not want to impact the traffic in changing the four lane road to two lane road. He referenced emergency vehicles being a problem; a two lane road creates traffic congestion; and, a traffic light needs to be addressed. Mr. Ross suggested that Council must consider both roads or City Council will be short changing its citizens. He does not want to see a decision being made now that will be a mistake later on. He referenced Arvida offering to pay for a portion of the improvements to Peytonville and feels it is a bribe or a serious trade off. He referenced the Thoroughfare Master Plan Study which is being prepared. Vlly VI JVU"11anc, 1VACLO i P I [a 7 P U J C City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page five Agenda Item #5, Continued Mayor Gary Fickes noted that the Thoroughfare Plan Study will be designed for a fifteen (15) to twenty (20) year time frame. A draft study will be ready for review in about sixty (60) days. The study will give the city some hard data and something we can use as an aid to gage what traffic conditions will be. He is looking forward to the study being completed. Fred Joyce, 455 Randol Mill Road, Southlake. Mr. Joyce stated that during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting some options have been submitted in regards to the changes being proposed to SouthRidge Parkway. He noted that there has not been an agreement made between him and the Arvida people in regard to his property. Ann Morrison, 210 Donley Court, Southlake. Mrs. Morrison lives in SouthRidge Lakes Addition. She has the only home that backs up to Peytonville Blvd. She added that they took a lot of time choosing the lot and they opted for Peytonville as they were told that it would remain the same. They are upset at Arvida for misleading them. For the welfare of the community, she feels the boulevard could not look better. The private drives sets them a part from tract housing. She feels that their property will be devalued. Mrs. Morrison stated that the builders have been told to "stay away from city meetings". Why would the city give up one great road for two mediocre roads? Trish Jones, 1365 Cross Timber Drive, Southlake. Ms. Jones stated she resents that her new neighbors are on one side of the room and the old neighbors are on the other side of the room. She feels the issue is between the developer and the city. She is concerned that if the developer is allowed to change the plan, this will set a precedent. Mayor Pro Tem Springer stated in reply to Mrs. Jones, it is not as bad as it looks. Most of the people in the audience are here for other items on the agenda. Conner Lam, 1280 Post Oak Trail, Southlake. He had questions in regards to the improvements to be made to North Peytonville Avenue and the $100,000 plus which is being offered by Arvida. Is the plan to widen the roadway up to 241? Is the paving to be comparable to the southern part of the roadway? He is glad to hear the City say they are going to reevaluate the road situation in Southlake. It bothers him that people move in and want the latest developer to solve all ills. If we can get a 24' roadway between FM 1709 and Dove Road it would be wonderful. City of Southlake, Texas i t J. I L City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page six Agenda Item #5, Continued James Hollstein, 1201 Oakwood Continental Park Estates and pavement is complete. He has in regards to the berm on the Hawk suggested the city would the problem. Trail, Southlake. He lives in stated the sewer is in and the i problem that he cannot get solved right of way of his property. Mr. get with Mr. Hollstein in regard to Rich Goldfuss, 1355 Cross Timber Drive, Southlake. Mr. Goldfuss asked Council what benefit we would receive by changing the plan? Everyone agrees that North Peytonville Avenue needs repair. Please consider both streets at the same time. Tina Vanderford, 1337 Ten Bar Trail, Southlake. No comments. Wendell Uldrich, 1000 Raven Bend Court, Southlake. Mr. Uldrick stated that the four lane road was approved as designed to handle the traffic and safety of the children, why change the plan now? Richard Norman, 1336 Meadow Glen, Southlake. Mr. Norman stated he is concerned about the developer being able to change an approved plan and also about the City Council approving the change. Bruce Smith, 111 SouthRidge Lakes, Southlake. Developer for SouthRidge Lakes Addition. Mr. Smith stated since they have asked for a continuance, he wants to hold his remarks until then. They are willing to comply with the findings of the Thoroughfare Plan Study. Mayor Fickes stated the only thing approved by the City Council at this time is the roadway the way it is. What Arvida is requesting is a change from the way it is. Agenda Item #11, ZA 91-07, Revised Pre Plat of SouthRidge Lakes. Mayor Fickes stated the City received a letter from the developer, Arvida, asking that this action be tabled until the May 21, 1991, City Council meeting. Motion was made to table ZA 91-07, time certain, May 21, 1991, as requested by the developers and that the letter of request be made a part of the record. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Evans Ayes: Wilhelm, Evans, Hall Nays: Springer, Farrier Approved: 3-2 vote (to table) City of Southlake, Texas L� P L P u City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page seven Agenda Item #11, Continued Mayor Pro Tem Springer voiced her opinion stating that it is difficult to speak against utilizing a traffic study to make decisions as that makes good logic. She is perturbed that this item has been brought to Council and then the developer asked to have it tabled. She feels that after conversations of late, if the developers wait until after the election the votes may change. Mrs. Springer stated that reducing the roadway concerns her greatly. Bruce Smith, Arvida. Mr. Smith commented that Mrs. Springer is wrong, the election has nothing to do with it. The item was requested for tabling because of the study and the information it might give them. He felt her comments were not fair. Citizens present asked Councilmembers what prompted the Thoroughfare Plan Study at this time. Curtis Hawk, City Manager, stated that after the bond election failed, he felt that the City needed the Thoroughfare Plan Study in order to get accurate numbers to take to the City Council. Councilmember Sally Hall stated that in her three years on the City Council, she has been working long and hard hours on such items as zoning, and development ordinances, as well as other things in the citizens behalf. Council has had to prioritize the items that need to be done with the funds the city has to spend. She resents the comments she has heard from the audience in regards to things being done in favor of developers. Agenda Item #6, Ordinance No. 480-01-A, 1st reading. Timarron The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy made a presentation in behalf of Bear Creek Communities, Inc., and the request for a zoning change for eight (8) parcels of property to be added to the existing residential P.U.D. The parcels are described as follows: Parcel A: 9.011 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2A3, and a portion of Lots 2 & 3 Spring Creek Acres. Parcel B: 8.771 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C1A. Parcel C: 8.298 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6B1, 6B2, 6B3, 8B, and 8C. Parcel D: 4.014 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6A. Parcel E: 2.810 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 6F1. Parcel F: 1.047 acres out of the J.N. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 1B2. Parcel G: 10.68 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, Tracts 2D, 2D1, 2D2, 2D2A, 2D2B, 2D3, 2D4, 2D5, and 2D6.Parcel H: 31.518 acres out of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract NO. 1038, Tracts 2G, 2H, 2J, and 2J1. The addition of these eight (8) parcels will increase the acreage of the project to 902.80 acres. City of Southlake, Texas r [a L C! I 11 City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page eight Agenda Item #6, continued Mrs. Gandy noted that the owner Communities, Inc. All the tracts exception of 2.978 acres which is is for Residential P.U.D. of the property is Bear Creek are zoned Agricultural, with the Zoned SF-1. The requested zoning Gandy stated that eighty-two (82) letters were sent to property owners within 200' and she received three (3) replies. In favor were Bill Stowe, and James Stahala. Opposed was B.J. Marriott who resides on Lilac Lane. Dennis Jerke, Carter & Burgess, 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Dallas, Texas. Mr. Jerke noted that the name of the property was Creekside and has been changed to Timarron, and added that they are not changing anything, only adding to the P.U.D. The public hearing resulted with no comments from the audience. Councilmember Sally Hall commented on the proposed 84' right of way on West Continental Blvd., adding, that she has had several calls from property owners in the area who are concerned with stakes being placed on their property. Mr. Jerke noted that they will only provide improvements to land that they own and that they will abide by the Thoroughfare Study. Mayor Fickes referenced a linear park along Big Bear Creek, which has been discussed with the City of Colleyville and the City of Keller. Larry Midtbo with Bear Creek Communities, commented that they have discussed this with the Park Board and they are showing on their first Phase, a section along Bear Creek as being reserved for parks. Councilmember Hall asked that the developers be generous in regards to schools in Southlake. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-01-A, 1st reading, to include the staff review letter of March 25, 1991, and the correction on the caption of the commercial tract. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Springer Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Wilhelm, Springer, Hall, Farrier, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote City of Southlake, Texas 3 I P L 7 L Ave I L City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page nine Council adjourned for recess at 9:30 P.M. Council returned to Open Session at 9:50 P.M. Agenda Item V , ZA 91-03, Dev Site Plan for Timarron, Phase 1&2 The Development Site Plan for Phases 1 & 2, of Timarron Addition, consists of a 165.01 acre tract of land out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038, were discussed. Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, noted that the property owner is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Phase 1 proposes 158 residential units and 18.1 acres of open space. Phase 2 proposes 76 residential units and 10.1 acres of open space. The developer plans to build a swim/tennis club on 11.9 acres. A copy of the lot size summary, prepared by Carter and Burgess is hereby attached to the minutes. Larry Midtbo stated he anticipates fifteen (15) to twenty (20) builders in the project and they are not thinking of "big box" residential housing. Dennis Jerke noted they intend to meet all city ordinances on the road. They plan to landscape Continental Blvd as it is in the middle of the project. They will use the "rural character" approach rather than curb and gutter on Continental Blvd. and it will be good quality. Continental Blvd. is their "front door" and they will improve Continental Blvd. as they go. Motion was made to approve the development site plan for Phase 1 & 2 of Timarron, including: a) side yard (not more than 25% and not less than 20 feet away from the next house) b) variation to development standards on page 7-2. c) to include items 1 & 2 in the review letter of March 26, 1991. d) not approving any variances to building structures on pages 7-9 to 7-14. e) P&Z requirements stated on page 7-1. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Evans Ayes: Wilhelm, Evans, Springer, Hall, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. r %-ALY VI %JUU1111QnG, I VACLO i H! 0 F-1 1 City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page ten Agenda Item #8, ZA 91-04, Pre Plat of Timarron, Phase 1&2 ZA 91-04, preliminary plat of Timarron, Phase 1 & 2, a 165.1 acre tract of land out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. This plat includes 234 residential lots with 28.2 acres of open space. Owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Motion was made to table the preliminary plat of Timarron, Phase 1 & 2, at the request of the developers until April 16, 1991. Motion: Springer Second: Farrier Ayes: Springer, Farrier, Hall, Wilhelm, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #9, ZA 91-05, Pre Plat of Block 7, Lots 1&2, SouthView Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, presented the preliminary plat of Block 7, Lots 1 & 2, SouthView Addition. A 4.937 acre tract of land out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being a portion of Tracts 5 and 5A. The current zoning is Office-1. The owner is T.J. McHale and the applicant is United States Postal Service. Mrs. Gandy stated two letters were sent to property owners within 200' and she received no responses. Motion was made to approve the preliminary plat of Block 7, Lots 1 & 2, subject to the review letter of March 25, 1991. Motion: Springer Second: Farrier Ayes: Springer, Farrier, Evans, Hall, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. Agenda Item #10, ZA 91-06, Final plat of Block 7, Lot 1, SouthView Addition. Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy stated the final plat consists of a 1.002 acre tract of land out of the William W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. The property is located on the corner of Southcrest Lane and North Carroll Avenue, across from Southlake City Hall. It was established that the post office will have to acquire a Special Exception Use Permit prior to building permits being issued. I lollyUIODUUMIKU, IVACIb i L 7 19 r, U 11 City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page eleven Agenda Item #10, Continued Motion was made to approve ZA 91-06, Final Plat of Block 7, Lot 1 of SouthView Addition, subject to the informational comments in the March 25, 1991 memorandum from City Planner, Greg Last. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Hall Ayes: Wilhelm, Hall, Springer, Evans, Farrier Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #12, ZA 91-08, Final Plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III ZA 91-08, the final plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III was considered. The 18.282 acre tract of land is out of the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No 522. The property is zoned SF-20A. The final plat is a portion of the previously approved Phase III Final plat and represents thirty (30) lots north of Phase I and east of Peytonville Avenue. The owner is Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. II. Doug Brister, Rt 2, Box 326, Boyd, Texas. Mr. Brister was present representing the Sullivan property on North Peytonville Avenue, at the curve. He requested the City Council consider what they can do for the Sullivan's. He asked Council to do what they are going to do and get it over with. He is asking Council to take the best options at this time. He added, can the additional right of way come from the undeveloped property on the north/west side of Peytonville Avenue. Councilmember Rick Wilhelm commented that he does not feel the owners and the developers are at odds in their thinking. The issue is do we need 64' of right of way. The answer will come from the Thoroughfare Plan Study. It is important that we maintain our esthetic atmosphere, by saving our trees. Councilmember Farrier stated if it warrants waiting for the Thoroughfare Plan Study for one agenda item, it warrants waiting for it for the other item. Motion was made to table ZA 91-08 until the Thoroughfare Plan Study is in hand. Motion: Farrier Motion died for lack of a second motion. Bruce Smith, Arvida. Mr. Smith asked Council to get on with business, as they have complied with the right of way requirement of 64' on Peytonville Avenue. I J I I u J d J 7 U11Y oT ooutnidKe, I eXdb City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page twelve Agenda Item #12, Continued Councilmember Jerry Farrier stated he feels the developer should wait the six (6) weeks until the Thoroughfare Plan Study is complete then the width of right of way needed for North Peytonville Avenue will have been determined. Farrier noted that in his discussions with Arvida, they complained about having to give the 400' and that it was something they did not want to give. They did not want to give the 64' right of way, and he wants to be sure they understand that they have a right to wait and then they will know what they need when the Thoroughfare Plan Study is complete. Wilhelm commented that the developer has agreed to give the 64' knowing the risks and that the Council feels that a 64' right of way would be a maximum. Motion was made to approve the final plat of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase III, subject to the March 27, 1991 review letter with item #3 showed to be changed to a 25' set back along Pecos. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Evans Ayes: Wilhelm, Evans, Springer, Hall Nays: Farrier Approved: 4-1 vote Agenda Item #13, Ordinance No. 480-C, 2nd reading The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy reviewed the changes to the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance No. 480. Councilmember Rick Wilhelm commented he and Greg Last have met in regard to the ordinance, and feel they ha of other cities in Tarrant County by approval in all Commercial, Industrial, zoning. Mainly because they want to know and to try and maintain the quality. establishing a consistent reference review and building permits. Public Hearing re expanded beyond a lot requiring concept plan B-1 and B-2 types of where things are going They have worked on prior to administrative Randall Boyd, 807 Pearl, Southlake . Mr. Boyd stated the purpose here tonight is to communicate to the elected representatives on City Council his opinion to the proposed changes to the zoning ordinance. Recently Council changed the zoning on the northwest corner of North White Chapel Blvd. and West Southlake Blvd. from the C-2 classification to S-P-2 zoning with C-3 uses. The strong endorsement of this change was based on Council ability to have more control of the construction of the proposed shopping center with S-P-2 zoning since it required site plan approval. They strongly argued that Council should change the C-2 zoning to give them this control and tonight Council is doing precisely what they recommended. L Vily VI JVUU II01%V, IVACO. i 7 H t r City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page thirteen Agenda Item #13, Continued There would have been no need to change the zoning from C-2 on this property. It is his opinion and the opinion of several others in Diamond Circle Estates that Council's true desire was to expand the uses of this property which C-3 provides rather than to protect the interests of citizens of Southlake by requiring a site plan. He felt it important that Council know that the citizens view these amendments as confirmation that Council intentions all along were to increase the uses of this property to support the developer rather than the rational Council used with them, which was protecting the citizens of this community. They do not want Council to do anything about it, only to know that they are staying abreast of the consistency of the decisions that are made in the Council meetings. In summary, he contends that the rational for changing the zoning on this corner was to support the demands of the developer rather than to protecting the future of the citizens of Southlake. In the future he encourages Council to keep the horse before the cart. In his area the citizens did not even talk about the traffic study. He is disappointed and disillusioned and he feels that this will be a better town if Council can get the processes and laws straight before they make key decisions. Mayor Pro Tem Springer commented that he may be disillusioned, but he is wrong if he thinks Council acted on his zoning to help the developer. Mayor Fickes stated that the property he is talking about was zoned Commercial some twenty years ago. What Council did on that tract of land offered the citizens two things: 1) a commercial tract of land that would bring a tax base, and 2) it gave Council and the citizens much more control. Kathy Letsinger, 804 Pearl Drive. been addressed. She asked that view. Ten days after the zoning change came up. Did it come contemplated before? She has a question that has not Council understand their point of had been approved, this new zoning up out of the blue, or was it Mayor Fickes stated that Council has been reviewing the zoning ordinance for several months. A couple of weeks ago, he met with Councilmembers Wilhelm and Hall and made several recommendations in regard to the zoning ordinance. Ordinances are either introduced, discussed, or changed at almost every meeting. City of Southlake, Texas i I L] City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page fourteen Agenda Item #13, Continued Public hearing closed. Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-C, 2nd reading. Motion: Wilhelm Second: Hall Mayor Fickes read the caption of the Ordinance. Ayes: Wilhelm, Hall, Springer, Farrier, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote. Agenda Item #17, Professional Services/Thoroughfare Plan Study Michael Barnes, Director of Public Works, stated that Cheatham & Associates, at the direction of the Council, has prepared a scope of services proposal for a City Thoroughfare Plan for the City of Southlake. Cheatham is planning to subcontract the traffic engineering work to a traffic engineering consultant. This plan will be the foundation in determining street and right-of-way widths for the future of Southlake. Jack Hatchel & Associates was introduced, and was chosen to perform the traffic study. He stated that the information will be ready for review within 60 days. Motion was made to approve authorization of city staff to complete a City Thoroughfare Plan Study. Motion: Hall Second: Farrier Ayes: Hall, Farrier, Springer, Wilhelm, Evans Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote The City Manager, Curtis Hawk noted that the funds are to come from the infrastructure reserve fund in the amount of $30,000. Agenda Item #14, Ordinance No 529, 1st reading. Fire Code Amendments Director of Public Safety, Billy Campbell, stated that currently the city is under the 1988 Fire Code and because of the development which is taking place in Southlake, it has become necessary to update our codes in certain areas. Between Chief Campbell and Chief Don Wilson, the ordinance was reviewed during the meeting. City of Southlake, Texas it Ci 11 d �1 41 11 J City Council Minutes April 2, 1991 page fifteen Motion was made to approve' the 1st reading of Ordinance No. 529, Fire Code, with minor changes as discussed. Motion: Hall Second: Farrier Mayor Fickes read the caption of the ordinance. Ayes: Hall, Farrier, Wilhelm, Evans Nays: None Abstention: Springer Approved: 4-0-1 Agenda Item #15, Addition to FM 1709 Water Line Relocation Michael Barnes, Director of Public Works explained to Council the two areas in which a change is necessary in regards to the water line relocation to FM 1709. A copy of the memorandum from Barnes to the City Manager dated March 22, 1991 is hereby incorporated into the minutes of the meeting. Motion was made to approve the addition to the FM 1709 water line location project design contract. Motion: Hall Second: Evans Ayes: Hall, Evans, Farrier, Springer, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote nda Item #16, Extension to Southlake Hills Final Plat The Zoning Administrator, Karen Gandy, explained to Council the need to extend the approval of the final plats for Southlake Hills, Phases 1 & 2, noting that the plats were previously approved on April 3, 1990. John Levitt, Levitt Engineering, was present and commented to Council that the developer, Dale Poe Development Corporation, does have full intention of developing the project, however, he feels that this is not the right time. He asked that Council consider the request for extension. Motion was made to approve the one year extension of the final plats for Southlake Hills, Phases 1 & 2. Motion: Springer Second: Farrier Ayes: Springer, Farrier, Evans, Hall, Wilhelm Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote City Council Minutes City of Southlake, Texas April 2, 1991 page sixteen Agenda Item #181City hall Renovation Project/Accepting Low Bid Director of Public Works, Michael Barnes, explained that bids for the renovation of City Hall were opened and read aloud on Friday, March 22, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. The contract calls for a base bid and four (4) alternate bids. A copy of the memorandum dated March 26, 1991, is hereby attached to the minutes of the this meeting. Barnes asked Council to consider the low bid from S.D. Peterson Construction in the amount of $95,700. Motion was made to approve the recommendation of City Staff of Option #1 which illuminates alternate bid of item #3. Motion: Farrier Second: Evans Ayes: Farrier, Evans, Wilhelm, Springer, Hall Nays: None Approved: 5-0 vote Agenda Item #19, Executive Session Mayor Fickes announced that Council would be going into executive session at 1:00 a.m., pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.A.S. Section 2(e) 2(f) and 2(g). Council returned to open session at 1:25 a.m. Agenda Item #20, Action Necessary/Litigations No action was necessary in regards to pending or contemplated litigations, as the result of the executive session. Agenda Item #21, Action Necessary/Personnel No action was necessary in regards to personnel matters including boards and commissions, as the result of the executive session. a City Council Minutes City of Southlake, Texas April 2, 1991 page seventeen Agenda Item #22, Action Necessary/Land Acquisition No action was necessary in regards to land acquisition, as the result of the executive session. Agenda Item #23, Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 1:30 a.m. by Mayor Gary Fickes. ayor Gar Fickes ATT ST: Sandra L . LeGrand City Secretary =� / .� rrnrnn��► 1 D L t r [l I H I :0- LU Ln u m L.. LU 'V N, 10 , V) ll� 0\10 dso t�o %00 Ao, 5t, Q�Q 42)/ C6 . C-1 cy') �l v i:L t5 L-L r. . U ' v m Ud AN U � w E• z U3 a 0 — i ao v :n <X C f \� C i d � j "1 fA �O a G w z � Af i City of Southlake, Texas 1 I M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator ' SUBJECT: ZA 91-03 Development Site Plan ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ZA 91-03 is the Development Site Plan for Phases 1 and 2, Timarron (formerly known as Creekside). Phase I and 2 are described as 165.1 acres out of the Hiram Grandberry Survey, ' Abstract No. 581, the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and the Hall Medlin Surveys, Abstract No. 1037 and 1038. ' The owner of the property is Bear Creek Communities, Inc. Timarron Phases 1 and 2 are located East of South White Chapel Blvd., both North and South of East Continental Blvd. ' Phase 1 proposes 158 residential units and 18.1 acres of open space. Phase 2 proposes 76 residential units and 10.1 acres of open space. The developer plans to build a swim/tennis club on 11.9 acres. Attached is a lot size summary provided by Carter and Burgess tfor Phases 1 and 2 of Timarron. It addresses four categories of lots and provides a breakdown of the number of lots, j percent of total lots and the average lot size per category. There were eighty-two (82) notices sent to property owners surrounding the entire residential P.U.D. development. Of ' the thirteen (13) property owners within 200 feet, two (2) owners have responded regarding the development site plan. Sam Burnitt, 921 S. White Chapel Blvd., spoke at P & Z and voiced his concerns about his liability with an existing pond on his property and the proposed development. Roger Feenstra, i 200 E. Continental Blvd., also spoke at P & Z and voiced his i concerns regarding the density and the needed improvements to ' East Continental Blvd. On March 7, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission ' recommended approval (4-2) of the Development Site Plan with the February 22, 1991 Staff Review deleting item #7 and informational comment #3. The entrance street on the north side of E. Continental Blvd. will be increased to a 60-foot R.O.W. to..the "loop" street with a 41-ft. pavement width. They further recommended changing the minimum side yard width to allow 5-foot side yards for only 25% of the lots and that there be a minimum of 20 feet between houses where the exception exists. 7- � J J City of Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager March 22, 1991 Page Two Listed below is a comparison of the existing SF-20A regulations and the amended regulations as proposed for the Timarron P.U.D.: Height: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard Adj. to Street Rear Yard: SF-20A 2 1/2 stories Max. 35' 35' 15' 30' 40' (35' cul-de-sac) P.U.D. 2 1/2 stories Max. 35" 25' Min. with 50% lots at 35' 5' 20' 20' Lot Width: 100' 85' (90% lots) 50'-85' (10% lots) Lot Depth: 125' 110' Lot Size: 20,000 sq. ft. 12,000 sq. ft. Max. Lot Coverage: 20% 30% Floor Area: 1,800 sq. ft. 2,400 sq. ft. Residential Density: 2.18 d.u./acre 250 units 1.5 d.u./acre Open Space/Park Area: Not less than 10 % of gross area On March 12, 1991, I received a letter from Larry Midtbo, Bear Creek Communities, Inc., requesting that this case be tabled and rescheduled for the April 2, 1991 City Council meeting. On March 19, 1991, the City Council approved (5-0) the applicant's request to continue this item until April 2, 1991. lya KPG J CITY OF SOM Aa APPLICATION FOR A.B04DMM TO ZONLNG NAP :application No. ZA 11 "C3 To -be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will infozm you ' of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a S100.00 fee for zoning; it mist accanpany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. c/o Larry Midtbo 300 E. Carpenter Frwy., Suite 1425 Irving, Texas 75062 ' DESCRIPTION (1= ACID BODED=) OF PROPERTY REQL'F.SM TO BE REZONED: See attachments I ZCN- LNG REQL=: FROM: P.U.D. Concept Plan To: —Development Site Plan This application rust be accacmanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. February 11, 1991 ' DATE Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared Ltd-4(z y fV\ 1 6 T 13 D known to me to be the person whose nacre is subscribed to the 1 foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. �- Given under my hand and seal of office this day of T-�✓L�u�'c 19 V C G ;ZVF'ARy PUBLIC IN AN FOR TEXAS Niy Ca=ission expires the 2a day of jq i A R- 1- 9 1 P R Z 1 1: 4 2 CARTER & BURGESS P - 02 TIMARRON PHASE 1 AND 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT SIZE SUMMARY MARCH 1, 1991 The following four categories of lots illustrate the lot mix and average lot sins in the initial two phases of the Timarron Development: CATEGORY NO, OF LOTS % OF TOTAL AV& LADT STZE I. 12,500 - 16,800 S.F. So 21% 14,029 S.F. ' II. 16,801 - 21,780 S.F. 118 50% 18,246 S.F. (1/2 acre) ' W. 21,781 - 30,000 S.F. 39 17% 24,783 S.F. IV. 30,001 S.F. > 27 12% 38.409 S.F. TOTAL 234 Lots 100% 20,761, S.F. 1 1 n I C City of Southlake, Texas DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-03 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE of REVIEW: 02/22/91 i PROJECT NAME: Development Site Plan - Timarron, Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: 02/11/91 OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Frwy_. Ste. 1425 Irvina, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Ste. 250 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. The boundary dimensions should be shown. 2. All adjacent tracts should be shown and labeled with existing zoning. 3. All adjacent R.O.W. should be shown. Also show existing sanitary sewer easement along Bear Creek. 4. Label the existing and proposed zoning classifications of the site. 5. All bufferyards should be labeled with width and type of bufferyard. 6. Are sidewalks intended throughout the development? If so, these could be shown schematically. 7. Show the location type and height of all walls, fences and screening devices. 8. Provide an anticipated schedule of development. 9. Provide the consultant's name on the plan. 10. Show the size of the points of ingress/egress to the site. 11. Show any intentions for signs or lighting or note the lack thereof. 12. The thoroughfare plan shows a proposed 64' R.O.W. collector roughly bisecting the portion of the development south of Continental and a 50' R.O.W. roughly along the west side of the portion north of Continental. * These thoroughfares were not required on the previously approved Concept Plan. 1-5 City of Southlake, Texas 13. During the previous Concept Plan approval, it was determined that descriptive landscape intentions would be addressed with each phase of the development. These intentions should be provided. * The 5-acre tract owned by Bear Creek at the Southeast corner of ' White Chapel and Continental should be considered during the review of this Development Site Plan. The approval of this plan may reduce the viability of this tract as residential ' development as depicted on the Land Use Plan. The following comments are not required in Section 30.8 and 40.3A, relating to Development Site Plans, however, we have provided the ' following suggestions for the Commission/Council to consider in their review of this project. *1. We recommend the adjacent tracts be labeled with the owner's name and Land Use Map designation. *2. The subdivision ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01-D does not allow access control strips as shown near lots 24-27 of Block 1. This out -tract should be provided public R.O.W. ' access either adjacent to the tract or stubbed to the tract. *3. There are 80 residential lots north of Continental which ' access from a single point of entry. Ordinance 483, Section 5.03-K-1 requires street stubs at 1,000' spacings. We would recommend a stub to the east or west from the northern most loop - roe *4. We recommend the applicant provide a summary of Use Regulations and Development Regulations. Development Regulations should highlight the variances from the requirements of SF20 zoning. This should include the following at a minimum: ' _ Height of structures Front yard setbacks: Percentage or number at various setbacks. Rear and side yard setback minimums. ' _ Minimum side setbacks next to streets. - Lot widths: Minimum and average lot widths at the setback line. - Lot depth: Minimum and average. - Lot size: Minimum and average. Also, approximately how many lots are in various size ranges, i.e. 10-12,000; 12-14,000; etc. - Maximum lot coverage. - Floor area minimums. Residential density and total dwelling units. ' _ Area of open space as a percentage by phase. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by March 11, 1991. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bear Creek Communities I Carter & Burgess 1-G GUMMARY A — 234 IrW W W 4s .M IYM.a„ 334.7 der« 0 - hNM1 Open Spact! M.2 Am" C — l.rRaMY CM ,tS Acres TO4AL 14" Acres PNGIECT OPEN SPACE .s At TIMARRON PLAN ° � & 12 EEAN C E Commum im or- ►mOdsCT OPEN SPACE n1 As. PMWSCT OPEN SPACE .4 Ad. LPl%W&CT OPEN SPACE r. aw IFRANK WELCH & ASSOCIATES • INC 1 March 20, 1991 Karen P. Gandy City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 iRe: Mobil Phase I Amenity Buildings Dear Karen: Please find enclosed reductions of the amenity buildings for Mobil Southlake. I hope these will be useful to create the ' transparencies that you will present to the City Council. Please contact me as soon as you get a ruling on the exterior cladding for these buildings. Please feel free to call if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Jon Pankratz AIA FRANK WELCH & ASSOCIATES INC. i /mm 1 I I 11 L -- McKinney Avenue ce 416 Dallas Texas 75202 1/954-0072 �— r J • O O Ne O E 7-10 LL L L Z i u I I A L I I Floor Plan COMMUNITY BUILDING 7013 ®■ llr ho n City of Southlake, Texas 1 �1 P 1 A U DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA91-03 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE of REVIEW: < 03/26/91 PROJECT NAME: Development Site Plan - Timarron Phases I & II DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY: OWNER/APPLICANT: Bear Creek Communities, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Frwy. Ste. 1425 Irvinq, Tx 75062 (214) 791-3333 03/11/91 ENG/SURVEYOR: Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook DrSte. 250 Dallas Texas 75247 (214) 638-0145 CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744. 1. Show the location type and height of all walls, fences and screening devices. 2. During the previous Concept Plan approval, it was determined that descriptive landscape intentions would be addressed with each phase of the development. These intentions should be provided. * The Council may wish to discuss the potential for continuation of the Bear Creek Linear Park through this development. * The thoroughfare plan shows a proposed 64' R.O.W. collector roughly bisecting the portion of the development south of Continental and a 50' R.O.W. roughly along the west side of the portion north of Continental. These thoroughfares were not required on the previously approved Concept Plan. * The single family development adjacent to the proposed 8-acre commercial tract may change in configuration pending decisions related to the proposed zoning for this corner tract. (i.e. approval/disapproval, size, shape, etc.) The following comments are not required in Section 30.8 and 40.3A, relating to Development Site Plans, however, we have provided the following suggestions for the Commission/Council to consider in their review of this project. *1. There are 80 residential lots north of Continental which access from a single point of entry. Ordinance 483, Section 5.03-K-1 requires street stubs at 1,000' spacings. We would recommend a stub to the east or west from the northern most loop. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bear Creek Communities Carter & Burgess 7-15 l I I City of Southlake, Texas — M E M O R A N D U M March 26, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director SUBJECT: RENOVATION OF CITY HALL BIDS CITY MANAGER 3 -al- 1 l Bids for the renovation of City Hall were opened and read aloud on Friday, March 22, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. Attached is a tabulation of those bids. The renovation contract calls for a base bid and four (4) alternate bids. The description of the base bid and alternate bids are as follows: uncc AiA Includes the complete renovation of the upper level open area (see attached drawings), stairway access for the upper level renovation, two windows for the City Manager's office, minor renovation of the lower level, and associated electrical and mechanical work for both lower and upper levels. Alternate #1: In the base bid only one restroom was included. This alternate adds an additional restroom. Alternate #2: Includes carpet for the dispatch, secretarial and captain's offices and the stairway. Alternate #3: Includes the purchase and installation of an emergency generator to include electrical panels and wiring. Alternate #4: Includes the electrical circuits and outlets that need to be connected to the emergency generator. The architects' original estimate (which incluaes vase bia and Alternates 1 & 2) was $65,000 to $75,000. The low bid total from S.D. Peterson Construction Company for the Base Bid and Alternates 1 & 2 is $83,600. Given the complexity of the project, the low bid for these three items seems to be UW reasonable. City of Southlake, Texas ir Ll H� 11 I I 0 I 1 d d h t b the were 4- 4- A 3& 4 were ad a to t o projec ecause y budgeted and it appeared to be the most appropriate time to install the emergency power system. In the 1990-91 Budget, $11,100 was budgeted for an emergency generator. Based on the bids received and vendor information, it will take approximately $20,000 to re -bid, purchase, and install an emergency generator. The low bidder's bid for alternate #4 appears to be a reasonable bid and Staff would recommend to award that alternate bid if it is the Council's desire to purchase and install an emergency generator at a later date. The options to the Council for purchasing and installing the generator are as follows: 1. Reject alternate #3, budget next year for generator, and award alternate #4. 2. Reject alternate #3 and allocate $8,900 from the Infrastructure Reserve Account and direct Staff to re -bid generator and have it installed. 3. Reject alternate #3 and alternate #4 and don't install generator. 4. Award alternate #3 and #4 as bid. The low bidder, S.D. Peterson Construction, submitted several references for projects of similar size. Four of these references were questioned as to quality of work, completion time of project, willingness to work with owner and change order requests. Each reference gave excellent marks to the contractor on all four items and would recommend the contractor for future projects. Therefore, the Staff recommends that the low bidder, S.D. Peterson Construction, be awarded the following bids: 1. Base Bid @ $78,500 2. Alternate Bid No. 1 @ $3,600 3. Alternate Bid No. 2 @ $1,500 4. Alternate Bid No. 4 @ $3,400 Total Bid $87,000 It is also recommended by Staff that Council accept option 1 above, and that Alternate Bid No. 3 be rejected. Wis C C � I I There remains approximately $30,400 from the $200,000 Contractual obligation Bonds to fund the City Hall renovation project. If the Council awards the renovation contract to S.D. Peterson Construction as recommended, then approximately $65,300 would be needed from the Infrastructure Reserve Account to fund the project. The breakdown of the funding is as follows: $ 87,000 Renovation Project Cost 8,700 Contingencies $ 95,700 Total Monies to Fund Renovation Project (30,400) Remaining C.D. Funds $ 65,300 Monies to be Transferred from Infrastructure Reserve Account Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. M 04 j7w MHB/lc /g-3 t� E a r♦ 4-1 E4 ury or souinlaKe, 1 exas O o O u9 o do o O O O it O� O� N t` M 0► 01 N m 01 r♦ r4 ri O O O t� 0 0 0 O N M t� 0 N t` d' 1t1 o O d' 1-1 N d' r- ri o .-I 10 M N N IV t0 r I M a Ln M t` 0 It N v %O N .i M .-1 01 N •-I N M -0 t0 t` H ri •-I rq 1-1 '-I H H r-1 ri 1-4 o O O o t- O o O O 0% d' O Id O 0% d' Ln o 0 r-1 t` O d' 4J M O ON M r f 9-1 M N to co Ln ri O E N t` N Ln M o o ri O N M t� 0 0► O ri N v V r♦ ri rl rf ri ri ri — 10 O O to 'O O O O O M t- to to st O O -0 +4 O O O %0 10 t` N `-' d' O N m o M 0► v 01 to t` i1 M o N O 0• N N 1 ri e} t` -± z — M O o to 'O O O O O M 0+ t- v ss o 1n t` -+ 0 0 O M M 94 0 -- t` .-1 m In o o t` In ri O 4! %0 ri O o 01 r♦ M rZ ri c+i Ln ri N d' N z ri N N N N N N �+N O O O CA O O O O O O tV M 1* 0 o O M O 0 to O 0► O to ... in N ri ri 10 Uf t� o o O r•1 4J r•1 r-1 N ri M ri ri N 1-1 M ri ri .-. r•1 N 3w 4; .4 9c O O O M O O O O 0+ In %o O to O 0► O O O In O In t- %0 V o M O Co co d' O In 0► M ri M d' M N N ri .-. 'O O O 0 to O O O O t` N t` .� «4 O V to -4 In o to O r4 t` o �+ m In N N %0 t` t` t` O O M N 0 o N P t: 1- ri M C 10 tV d' m t- o o o 0 0► m Cl% ri N M 1d ri ri ri m L". H d C C U C O 41 11 m H M C.• :: H E H c a o a U U U 4 $4 0 R� O Id V V 7 0 O R7 $4 m m to O O 14 O $4 11 O G 41 m 14 :1 'O U m 0 41 c w O U U c a V U O m b 41 c R E .a U w 0 c $a N $4 V H � 4 V R! O U 'O 11 a U 1-4 X, o m N r4 ci r1 1~ +1 cd E-c m O O O m x A 0 � 3 c Z O ccdd cad ?4 - 4 $, vi H m z W A a a z 3 c� -- d .d 'C1 +1 O ri m r-1 N M d' 41 �0 - "' 9� ri r•1 . r- COURT CLERK p DISPATCH jL _ i i _'v VEST I r+ Ir - ELEC. VEST. 2 INTERVIEW mi BOOKING - f COURT FILES c-4 I" ORRIDOR 3 RECORDS +4 fJ CITY ADMIN. r TLT. 3 U li f CORRIDOR 4 t1 ' EVIDENCE - -• ` '. - L:A8 _P CELL CELL CELL CITY MOR.. pp w� - -�--- :PAN,- �X �6' CQtJ TG----,+ �kia ,�� t' -�9'-•Gt�N--t VVAt-yam _ LOWER -LEVEL FLOOR "PLAN SCALE I/8" = 1 0 i t e D. SECY, RECEPTION STO. CAPTAIN OFFICE 2 e0 POLICE CHIEF LINX OF {.. �;�rZ• • •-,��, r gi,�„CO InDtO $rq S+ UAD RM. N f0 wn � "' :may ' _:i!��-.ip;••;.�.�_, ti:,. � ++��-• .��tt ,+} ... T -;.. '- �_: _ - �Jrt�4iCf! CrME►JCi�I�s - - s AT LO.W2 6 Levee, pc.�ki�l l .• ..x�, ,!.r :UPPER:" LEVEL. TLOOR PLAN SCALE" 06. = 1 0�� - - �. :• --'�! �■:�■�� NEW-'.CONSTRUCTIOPi .. DOOR N0. (SEE SCHEDULE- SHEET 2) ,•��- _ _ REh1bV£:''EX{ST{NG PLAN NOTE SYMBOL (NOTES -SHEET I) 4_4 City of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 1991 wk, City Manager arnes, Public Works Director CITY MANAGER a -i tract - F.M. 1709 Utility Relocation ct with Cheatham & Associates for the ation of utilities along F.M. 1709, the were from Pearson Lane to S.H. 114. contract was executed, two additional to Cheatham's contract. added to the design contract is to 's water system for emergency water rovide fire protection to the Texas nder Care buildings during construction. nt between the two cities has been as. The proposed engineering design and area from Cheatham & Associates is The second area that needs to be added is along F.M. 1938 from the city limits to F.M. 1709. The Highway Department has requested that the utilities along F.M. 1938 be relocated because they are preparing to reconstruct F.M. 1938. Most water customers (24) south of F.M. 1709 along both sides of F.M. 1938 are being served by Keller. Keller staff has approached Southlake staff and has proposed that if Southlake will relocate the water lines along F.M. 1938, Keller would not expect reimbursement for these customers. Since these customers are Southlake residents, it seems prudent for the City of Southlake to serve their citizens. The City Attorney is preparing an interlocal agreement between Keller and Southlake to allow Southlake to serve these customers, provided Southlake will fund and relocate the water lines along F.M. 1938 without having to reimburse Keller for those customers. The proposed engineering design and surveying fee from Cheatham & Associates for the second area is $9,950. City of Southlake, Texas E The total additional engineering design and surveying fee for both areas is $13,450. Below is the proposed allocation of those charges: Original Contract Additional Charges Revised Contract Engineering $ 75,500 $ 9,400 $ 84,900 Surveying $ 26,500 $ 4,050 $ 30,550 $ 102,000 $ 13,450 $ 115,450 Therefore, Staff recommends that Cheatham & Associates' contract for the relocation of utilities along F.M. 1709 be revised from $102,000 to $115,450. Please place this item on the next Council's agenda for consideration. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact me. M tdY MHB/ 1 c ArvidaiJME Partners 2149805075 E Arvida Company TEXAS /MIowEST ON=N ]a-(1 fib 153W PARKWAY (J �11 � sum 350 3so Y DALL S. TEXAS 7520-4646 rELEPMONE: (21q 960-5075 A R R 2 1991 OFFICE OF CITY St;CR£TAR April 2, I991 Ms. Karen Gandy City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Karen: P.e2 Late last week, Arvida was informed that the City staff will request funding from the City Council on Tuesday April 2, 1991 to develop a new thoroughfare plan for the City of Southlake. Our understanding is that the funding required for this study is $30,000 and the intent is to determine an appropriate road system for the City of Southlake. We were also informed that preliminary information on traffic counts and projected daily flows would be available in approximately six weeks. As you know we have requested a change in our preliminary plat for SouthRidge Lakes to reduce the size of SouthRidge Lakes Parkway from an 84' R.O.W. with a four lane road to a 64' R.O.W. with a three lane (37') road. This reduction was based on the following. a). Changes in the existing thoroughfare plan. b). Traffic study by DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. requested by city staff indicating a need for only a 37' road. c). High school location at southeast corner of FM 1709 and Peytonville. Based on these and other reasons we continue to support our changes as meeting the needs of general traffic flow for the City of Southlake as well as being prudent for our homeowners at SouthRidge Lakes. However, due to the fact that the City of Southlake is proposing to develop a new thoroughfare plan, I believe it is prudent for Arvida to request a continuum of our hearing at City Council until the preliminary report/information is prepared but no later than May 21, 1991. I understand that during this interim period Arvida will continue to be required to develop according to the current approved preliminary plat as evidenced by our final plat submission and we are proceeding to develop lots based on market demand. ArvidaiJMH Partners 2149805075 P.03 Ms. Karen Gandy April 2, 1991 Page Two Obviously, approval of the funding for the new thoroughfare plan is key in our decision to continue and I hope that you can appreciate our need to produce new lots to meet market demand at SouthRidge Lakes. We will continue to work with the city in any way possible and offer our request for continuum in the spirit of cooperation toward a reasonable solution to our request and a workable thoroughfare plan for the City of Southlake. Best Regards, Bruce Smith President L.0' Texas/Midwest Division cc: Gary Fickes Curtis Hawk U We,Ithe undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a'four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. 6 j l.33 i i'9� d'a r✓ C'/r t' s 1331 S y5 Al. tegionvi Ile /i � `�. X -- Wit,-C 13 � 3 �e n �a ✓� 1�'ab � f3 Tr I cl�' 2 -I''sh Bat -ThA1 { .-J�_ �s M,v) -ray 41) A4e4 4-9 We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as A four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Address l� �Ql L&Y-,,jV'AAJ t 63 u i&/J &,jt,#Mkt Tyr Z_1`.,Ia_V,Kw Ss,.�jVAL M.. M-6211 K We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a -four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name r�/YYV� IrJ /0 ,/ ..,'i MAMMA ROW. lfy-= Address /.&2 /Fit✓ A zC &J-1e L J3� Lqy:cq/ We,,the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a.four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Address 4r -7 6 2:- s 71_1,�Ph "ri Z ZO/I l �� //11/� S L '7 M sG 7 a 9oz I Z-l( C,ytz og %o�YZ /2,1( 76o 9Z- T�� �-.. 4,- -,26052— /3so 0zoss—)7y,7,Bryl 13�i cis �z /3,:�3 �voomee av� AN Sod-*,Izr A;09.2 lWe, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a'four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. 'Name G ,ck• rn ea� n) L f 7 - ))y n/ 'l 'Vl. / ti�'4i•w i Address l3j M. We,'the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as la four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. ud-eA Address 7'�a q-7- �J. cOd ajc TA,, 76 Q� 2- < 6 7� 137c k"roo`C �X ?&o9;i, 130 6Sfe-1 IC' s'o � (� �� i x 76652 % 76 G c?Z 7166�5'7 -30 Ile, /vA�2 �o�Z /GK� �X 7' oy�Z >PiCALE /X 1-6 z:9 -�' a"6-zzA '�i -/gc q �)- We, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a'four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Address L -13q() --qtLLJ �- I i — f,3 a \aL j3g3 For-esi Lv\ SO�A� zk4 C L" We,'the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a•four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Address cZ V Q CY. VAW.) 19 1 . j 1 EWe, the undersigned, want the Southridge Lakes Parkway to be completed as a'four lane road per the original agreement by the Southlake City Council and Arvida. Name Address 7 � /