The URL can be used to link to this page

1996-03-05 City of Southlake,Texas, • MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works Department SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Sewer Construction on the S-2 Sewer Line, Section II, Water Line and Street Reconstruction on Brock Drive GENERAL INFORMATION This section of the S-2 Sewer Line will begin on Brock Drive, cross F.M. 1709, go north along the creek line, and end at Florence Road (map attached). This sewer extension will provide the trunkline sewer to provide sanitary sewer to: • Sutton Place - an existing modular home development off Florence Road. The City has applied for Community Block Grant Funds to extend the sanitary sewer into Sutton Place. • Ridgewood I and II Additions - new development on Johnson Road. • Jellico Estates - programmed in year 3 of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. • Hillside Estates - the western one-third at this existing addition. • Timberline Estates - an existing addition on Johnson Rd. • Other homes along Jellico Creek. • Vista Trails in the City of Keller. Council recently approved an Interlocal Agreement with Keller to provide for Vista Trails to use this sewer project. As part of the Interlocal Agreement Keller will provide sewer service to Southlakes S-1 drainage area. This project also includes constructing an 8-inch water line to replace the existing 4-inch line, and it includes reconstructing Brock Drive. Advertisements were published on February 4th and 11th, 1996. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on February 22, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. i SCurtis E. Hawk, City Manager S-2 Sewer Line, Section II March 1, 1996 Page 2. BID TABULATION See attached bid tabulations prepared by Cheatham and Associates. Wright Construction was low bidder for Alternate A and Alternate B. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS During the bidding process, the City of Keller requested that Southlake lower the north portion of the sewer to accommodate Keller's sewer design in their neighborhood. Keller will pay the difference for this modification. The low bid was $1,571 for this modification. Staff requested that the cul-de-sac at the south end of Brock Drive be bid utilizing an asphalt cross section and a concrete cross section. As asphalt tends to "shove" when a large truck (garbage trucks) makes the turn in the cul-de-sac, we wanted to see what the difference in cost would be to construct a concrete cul-se-sac. This difference as bid is $6,900. [Alternate A - asphalt street Swith a concrete cul-de-sac was bid at $111,591.20, while Alternate B - asphalt street with asphalt cul-de-sac was bid at $104,691.20.] Staff has contacted a representative of the neighborhood and they agree that the cul-de-sac would be better constructed in concrete. The engineer's estimate for the total project (sewer, water, and street) is $654,566. The low bid of Wright Construction for Alternate A (concrete - cul-de-sac) is $617,274.36. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the project will be: • S-2, Section A Sewer - from fund 752 Sewer Impact Fees. • Eight-inch water main- from fund 750 Waterworks Improvement Fund. • Brock Drive - Fund 501 Infrastructure Reserve Fund • • • Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager S-2 Sewer Line, Section II March 1, 1996 Page 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the City Council award the referenced project to low bidder Wright Construction in the amount of $617,274.36 for Alternate "A" concrete cul-de-sac for Brock Drive. Please place this on the March 5, 1996 agenda for Council review and consideration. gdidg4"-- BW/sm Attachments: Bid Tabulation Map S wp611 wpdocs 1 wthead.mem I agenda l s-2s ecAb.wpd 5/9-3 CHEATHAM � �� :�:. AND FEB 281996 ASSOCIATES °�aT.°rPU` .' :•,••' • February 27, 1996 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: City of Southlake Proposed Sewerage Improvements for Sanitary Sewer Outfall"S-2",Phase II Together with Appurtenant Work Project No. 001-426 Dear Mr. Whitehead: Bids for the referenced project were received on February 22, 1996 in the City's Council Chambers. Accordingly, we transmit herewith for your study and consideration,the detailed tabulation of the bids, copy of which is attached hereto. Adequate bidder competition was achieved when a total of six(6)construction firms submitted • bids. A condensed summary of the detailed tabulation has been prepared and is presented herewith as follows: Order Bidder & Location Alternate"A" Alternate"B" of Bids Conc. Cul-De-Sac HMAC Cul-De-Sac for Brock Dr. for Brock Dr. 1. Wright Construction Co. $617,274.36 $610,374.36 Grapevine, TX 2. J.C. Evans Construction Co. $825,998.86 $819,718.86 Austin, TX 3. Garr Construction, Inc. $834,869.45 $828,569.45 Grapevine, TX 4. Atkins Bros. Equip. Co., Inc. $892,299.60 $884,361.60 Grand Prairie,TX 5. Pate Bros. Const.,Inc. $911,881.92 $904,800.19 Kennedale, TX 6. Saber Development Corp. $1,032,866.70 $1,031,616.70 Dallas, TX S ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 •Fax 817/265-8532 • Mr. Bob Whitehead February 27, 1996 4111 City of Southlake Page 2 As indicated above, the low bid for each of the two alternates was submitted by Wright Construction Co. of Grapevine, Texas. The bid alternates were the result of the City's desire to consider restoration and rehabilitation of Brock Drive with construction involving HMAC roadway pavement entirely, including the cul-de-sac on Brock Drive (Alternate"B"), or, to construct the cul-de-sac portion of the pavement utilizing reinforced concrete (Alternate "A"). The Wright Company fully meets the background and experience requirements of the City. In view of the above, we recommend that the construction contract for the referenced project be awarded to the firm of Wright Construction of Grapevine, Texas, lowest bidder, and that selection of the contracted alternate be based on considerations most advantageous to the City. We enclose a copy of the bid tabulation for your use. If we can be of further service in this matter or answer any questions, please advise. Respectfully, 17,1 Eddie Cheatham, P.E. f:\word\southlak\426\award.bid Enclosure: Bid Tabulation S • •ARY SEWER OUTFALL 11 S-211 - JOB NO. 001-426 III 11111) . CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 1 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 WRIGHT CONST. J.C.EVANS GARR CONST. ATKINS BROS. 601 W.WALL ST. 3900 VALLEY VIEW LN. P.O.BOX 908 918 W.MARSHALL JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II GRAPEVINE,TX 76051 IRVING,TX 75062 GRAPEVINE,TX 76099 GRAND PRAIRIE,TX 75051 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: 817/481-2594 PHONE: 214/257-0639 PHONE: 817/424-5388 PHONE: 214/647-8890 FAX: 817/481-2597 FAX: 214/255-3224 FAX: FAX: 214/602-0910 JOB NO: 001-426 AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT I-SS OUTFALL"S-2" 1 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 134 26.00 $3,484.00 45.00- $- 6,030.00 24.00 $3,216.00 30.00 $4,020.00 2 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 65 28.00 $1,820.00 50.00 $3,250,00 28.00 $1,820.00 32.00 $2,080.00 3 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 10 31.00 $310.00 55.00 $550,00 30.00 $300.00 36.00- $360.00 4 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 8'-10' DEPTH L.F. 43 33.00- $1,419.00 55.00 $2,365.00 56.00 $2,408.00 40.00 $1,720.00 5 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. _ 24 37.00 $888.00 60.00 $1,440.00 57.00 $1,368,00 44.00 $1,056.00 6 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 58 40.00 $2,320.00 65.00 $3,770,00 58.00 $3,364.00 49.00 $2,842.00 7 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 87 45.00 $3,915.00 70.00 $6,090.00 59.00 $5,133.00 55.00 $4,785.00 8 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 117 50.00 $5,850.00 75.00 $- 8,775.00 60.00 $7,020.00 60.00 $7,020.00 9 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. 183 66.00 $12,078.00 80.00 $14,640.00 61.00 $11,163.00 67.00 $12,261.00 ( � 10 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE,20'-22'DEPTH L.F. 215 82.00 $17,630.00 85.00 $18,275.00 66.00 $14,190.00 72.00 $15,480.00 �'� 11 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE,22'-24'DEPTH L.F. 263 111.00 $29,193.00 90.00 $23,670.00 66.00 $17,358.00 81.00 $21,303.00 12 -15"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-12'DEPTH L.F. 100 34.00 $3,400.00 55.00 $5,500.00 56.00 $5,600.00 44.00 $4,400.00 13 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE,6'-8' DEPTH L.F. 433 19.00 $8,227.00 35.00 $15,155.00 23.00 $9,959.00 23.00 $9,959.00 14 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 8'-10'DEPTH L,F. 561 21.00 $11,781.00 40.00 $22,440.00 25.00 $14,025.00 26.00 $14,586.00 15 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 255 23.00 $5,865.00 45.00 $11,475.00 30.00- $7,650.00 29.00 $7,395.00 16 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. - 59 24.00 $1,416.00 50.00 $2,950.00 ' 32,00 $1,888.00 31.00 $1,829.00 17 12"SDR 26 SS IPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 72- 25.00 $1,800.00 55.00 $3,960.00 46.00 $3,312.00 35.00 $2,520.00 18 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16' DEPTH L.F. ' 312 27.00 $8,424.00 60.00 $18,720.00 46.00 $14,352.00 39.00 $12,168.00 19 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 182 30.00 $5,460.00 65.00 $11,830.00 47.00 $8,554.00 42.00 $7,644.00 20 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. ` 60 37.00 $2,220.00 70.00 $4,200.00 64.00- $3,840.00 46.00 $2,760.00 21 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE,20'-22'DEPTH L.F. ' 50 94.00 $4,700.00 75.00 $3,750.00 - 70.00 $3,500.00 52.00 $2,600.00 22 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 69 31.00 $2,139.00 60.00 $4,140.00 56.00 $3,864.00 - 43.00 $2,967.00 23 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 96 34.00 $3,264.00 65.00- $- 6,240.00 56.00 $5,376.00 49.00 $4,704.00 24 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 189 35.00 $6,615.00 70.00 $13,230.00 58.00 $10,962.00 51.00 $9,639.00 25 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE,0'-6' DEPTH L.F. - 265 18.00 $4,770.00 ' 25.00 $6,625.00 23.00 $6,095.00 16.00 $4,240.00 26 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE,6'-8'DEPTH L.F. ' 247 19.00 $4,693.00 30.00 $7,410.00 23.00 $5,681.00 19.00 $4,693.00 27 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 426 20.00 $8,520.00 35.00 $14,910.00 30.00' $12,780.00 22.00 $9,372.00 28 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 287 21.00 $6,027.00 40.00 $11,480.00 31.00 $8,897.00 24.00 $6,888.00 - 29 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 217 23.00 $4,991.00 . 45.00 $9,765.00 32.00 $6,944.00 28.00 $6,076.00 30 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 52 25.00 $1,300.00 50.00 $2,600.00 50.00- $2,600.00 31.00 $1,612.00 31 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 34 22.06 $748.00 45.00 $1,530.00 33.00 $1,122.00 26.00 $884.00 32 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 316 24.00 $7,584.00 50.00 $15,800.00 34.00 $10,744.00 30.00 $9,480.00 32A 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 45- 33.00 $1,485.00 60.00 $2,700.00 56_00 $2,520.00 ' 44.00 $1,980.00 /42d545EW S•RY SEWER OUTFALL "S-2" - JOB NO. 001-426 4110 • CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 2 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 WRIGHT CONST. J.C.EVANS GARR CONST. ATKINS BROS. 601 W.WALL ST. 3900 VALLEY VIEW LN. P.O.BOX 908 918 W.MARSHALL JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II GRAPEVINE,TX 76051 IRVING,TX 75062 GRAPEVINE,TX 76099 GRAND PRAIRIE,TX 75051 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: 817/481-2594 PHONE: 214/257-0639 PHONE: 817/424-5388 PHONE: 214/647-8890 FAX: 817/481-2597 FAX: 214/255-3224 FAX: FAX: 214/602-0910 JOB NO: 001-426 AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT I-SS OUTFALL"S-2" 33 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16' DEPTH L.F. 190 26.00 $4,940.00 55.00 $10,450.00 52.00 $9,880.00 32.00 $6,080.00 34 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 64 28.00 $1,792.00 60.00 $3,840.00 70.00 $4,480.00 37.00 $2,368.00 34A 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. 34 35.00 $1,190.00 65.00 $2,210.00 80.00 $2,720.00 41.00 $1,394.00 35 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 265 26.00 $6,890.00 25.00 $6,625.00 30.00 $7,950.00 41.00 $10,865.00 36 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 435 30.00 $13,050.00 30.00 $13,050.00 31.00 $13,485.00 49.00 $21,315.00 37 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 105 33.00 $3,465.00 35.00 $3,675.00 35.00 $3,675.00 57.00 $5,985.00 38 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 25 37.00 $925.00 40.00 $1,000.00 50.00 $1,250.00 66.00 $1,650.00 39 10"PVC BORED CROSSING L.F. 521 67.00 $34,907.00 130.00 $67,730.00 115.00 $59,915.00 174.00 $90,654.00 40 CONST. 12"BORED&ENCASED CROSSINGS L.F. 448 94.00 $42,112.00 160.00 $71,680.00 250.00 $112,000.00 291.00 $130,368.00 l 41 CONST. 12"BORED CROSSINGS L.F. 310 67.00 $20,770.00 150.00 $46,500.00 115.00 $35,650.00 165.00 $51,150.00 -l 42 CONST. 15"BORED CROSSING L.F. 30 110.00 $3,300.00 170.00 $5,100.00 115.00 $3,450.00 224.00 $6,720.00 43 CONST.16"BORED CROSSING/F.M. 1709 L.F. 147 141.00 $20,763.66 180.00 $26,506.80 330.00 $48,595.80 384.00 $56,547.84 44 CONST. 10"BORED CROSSING L.F. 24 86.00 $2,064.00 130.00 $3,120.00 115.00 $2,760.00 198.00 $4,752.00 �j 45 4'DIA.SEWER MANHOLES(0'-6'DEPTH) EA. 30 1100.00 $33,000.00 1500.00 $45,000.00 1480.00 $44,400.00 1596.00 $47,880.00 46 CONST. EXTRA DEPTH OF 4'SEWER MH V.F. 237 115.00 $27,255.00 100.00 $23,700.00 85.00 $20,145.00 140.00 $33,180.00 47 CONNECTION OF 15"SEWER LINE L.S. 1 1200.00 $1,200.00 500.00 $500.00 23500.00 $23,500.00 532.00 $532.00 48 4"SS SERVICE INSTALLATIONS. EA. 21 267.00 $5,607.00 300.00 $6,300.00 220.00 $4,620.00 133.00 $2,793.00 49 4"PVC SDR 35 SEWER PIPE L.F. 350 15.00 $5,250.00 20.00 $7,000.00 10.00 $3,500.00 14.00 $4,900.00 50 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENTS L.F. 250.00 8.00 $2,000.00 20.00 $5,000.00 16.00 $4,000.00 12.00 $3,000.00 51 ASPHALTIC ROADWAY PVMNT REPL. L.F. _ 1050 28.00 $29,400.00 20.00 $21,000.00 18.00 $18,900.00 27.00 $28,350.00 52 GRAVEL ROADWAY REP L.F. 750 14.00 $10,500.00 10.00 $7,500.00 13.00 $9,750.00 12.00 $9,000.00 53 CAPPED STUB OUT CONNECT.TO MH EA. 7 315.00 $2,205.00 250.00 $1,750.00 300.00 $2,100.00 333.00 $2,331.00 54 REMOVE EXIST.SHRUBS L.S. 1 1100.00 $1,100.00 500.00 $500.00 7500.00 $7,500.00 2660.00 $2,660.00 55 16'STEET GATES EA. 5 350.00 $1,750.00 500.00 $2,500.00 400.00 $2,000.00 931.00 $4,655.00 56 TRENCH SAFETY L.F. 6684 1.00 $6,684.00 2.00 $13,368.00 1.50 $10,026.00 3.10 $20,720.40 57 EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM L.S. 1 1100.00 $1,100.00 500.00 $500.00 1500.00 $1,500.00 1000.00 $1,000.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT I(ITEM NOS.1-57) $467,555.66 $681,369.80 $675,356.80 $752,173.24 me.5.25Ew •ARY SEWER OUTFALL "S-2" - JOB NO. 001-426 11110 • CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 3 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 WRIGHT CONST. J.C.EVANS GARR CONST. ATKINS BROS. 601 W.WALL ST. 3900 VALLEY VIEW LN. P.O.BOX 908 918 W.MARSHALL JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II GRAPEVINE,TX 76051 IRVING,TX 75062 GRAPEVINE,TX 76099 GRAND PRAIRIE,TX 75051 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: JOB NO: 001-426 AMT.BID: AMT.BID: AMT.BID: AMT.BID: ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT II-WATER FACILITIES • 1 8"DIA.C-900 PVC WATER PIPE L.F. 1074 16 $17,184.00 35.00 $37,590.00 16.00 $17,184.00 15.00 $16,110.00 2 6"DIA.C-900 PVC WATER PIPE L.F. 30 15 $450.00 30.00 $900.00 30.00 $900.00 11.00 $330.00 3 8"DIA.GATE VALVE VALVE BOX EA. 1 580 $580.00 600.00 $600.00 830.00 $830.00 525.00 $525.00 4 6"DIA. GATE VALVE&VALVE BOX EA. 3 430 $1,290.00 400.00 $1,200.00 560.00 $1,680.00 401.00 $1,203.00 5 CONST. F.H. INSTALLATIONS EA. 3 . 1400 $4,200.00 1000.00 $3,000.00 1300.00 $3,900.00 1111.00 $3,333.00 6 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LBS. 1063 1 $1,063.00 2.00 $2,126.00 2.00 $2,126.00 1.00 $1,063.00 7 CONST.8"TAPPED CONNECTION EA. 1 2100 $2,100.00 1500.00 $1,500.00 2500.00 $2,500.00 864.00 $864.00 8 WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS EA. 8 620 $4,960.00 300.00 $2,400.00 150.00 $1,200.00 154.00 $1,232.00 9 1"DIA. POLYETHYLENE WATER PIPE L.F. 254 11 $2,794.00 11.00 $2,794.00 10.00 $2,540.00 10.00 $2,540.00 10 CONST.GRAVEL DRIVEWAY REPL. L.F. 45 10.5 $472.50 10.00 $450.00 13.00 $585.00 4.00 $180.00 . 11 FURN.&INST. COMP.CRUSHED STONE C.Y. 66 15 $990.00 15.00 $990.00 12.00 $792.00 25.00 $1,650.00 12 CUT, PLUG&ABANDON EXIST.4"W.L. EA. 1 520 $520.00 250.00 $250.00 300.00 $300.00 556.00 $556.00 13 CUT, PLUG&ABANDON EXIST.2"W.L. _ 1 450 $450.00 250.00 $250.00 200.00 $200.00 556.00 $556.00 O. 14 CLEAR R.O.W. FOR CONST. OF W.L. L.F. 1074 1 $1,074.00 5.00 $5,370.00 12.00 $12,888.00 1.00 $1,074.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT II(ITEM NOS.1-14) $38,127.50 $59,420.00 $47,625.00 $31,216.00 UNIT III-STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 NECESSARY ROADWAY&R.O.W. COSTS L.F. 1105.3 3.00 $3,315.90 5.00 $5,526.50 11.50 $12,710.95 4.00 $4,421.20 2 STREET EXCAVATION C.Y. 800 9.00 $7,200.00 3.00 $2,400.00 7.00 $5,600.00 12.00 $9,600.00 3 CONST.8"COMPACTED LIME SUBGRADE S.Y. 3425 1.90 $6,507.50 1.66 $5,685.50 1.80 $6,165.00 2.00 $6,850.00 4 LIME FOR STABILIZATION PROCESS TONS ' 75 100.00 $7,500.00 91.00 $6,825.00 96.00 $7,200.00 91.00 $6,825.00 5A CONST. 5"REINF.CONCRETE CUL-DE-SAC L.S. 1 19000.00 $19,000.00 17280.00 $17,280.00 18000.00 $18,000.00 20412.00 $20,412.00 5B CONST. CUL-DE-SAC W/6"HMAC PVMNT L.S. 1 12100.00 $12,100.00 11000.00 $11,000.00 11700.00 $11,700.00 12474.00 $12,474.00 6 'ASPHALTIC TACK COAT S.Y. 3176 0.20 $635.20 0.16 $508.16 0.20 $635.20 0.16 $508.16 7 FURN&INST.6"THICK HMAC SURFACING S.Y. 2540 13.75 $34,925.00 12.49 $31,724.60 13.00 $33,020.00 15.00 $38,100.00 8 4"HMAC DRIVEWAY RECONNECTION S.F. 130 2.10 $273.00 1.91 $248.30 2.25 $292.50 3.00 $390.00 9 6"COMP. CRUSHED STONE DRIVEWAY S.F. 3000 1.00 $3,000.00 0.94 $2,820.00 1.10 $3,300.00 1.00 $3,000.00 10 SAW CUT L.F. 88 1.70 $149.60 2.00 $176.00 3.00 $264.00 2.00 $176.00 11 PAVEMENT STRIPING L.S. 1 825.00 $825.00 1000.00 $1,000.00 ' 1500.00 $1,500.00 114.00 $114.00 12 FURN. &INST. 18"CLASS III R.C.P. CULVERTS L.F. 196 110.00 $21,560.00 35.00 $6,860.00 75.00 $14,700.00 58.00 $11,368.00 13 CONST. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMP. L.S. 1 3500.00 $3,500.00 3155.00 $3,155.00 3500.00 $3,500.00 6579.00 $6,579.00 14 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 3200.00 $3,200.00 1000.00 $1,000.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 567.00 $567.00 SUBTOTAL(ITEM NOS . 1-14) $123,691.20 $96,209.06 $123,587.65 $121,384.36 SUBTOTAL ALTERNATE"A" $111,591.20 $85,209.06 $111,887.65 $108,910.36 SUBTOTAL ALTERNATE"B" $104,691.20 $78,929.06 $105,587.65 $100,972.36 GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT BID(ALT."A") $617,274.36 $825,998.86 $834,869.45 $892,299.60 GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT BID(ALT."B") $610,374.36 $819,718.86 $828,569.45 $884,361.60 unu""u" _ .. . .. .. - SSARY SEWER OUTFALL "S-2" -JOB NO. 001-426 . , _ . _ _ _._ _ . . . , CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 4 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 PATE BROS.CONST. SABER DEVELOPMENT 780 W.MANSFIELD HW P.O.BOX 540186 JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II KENNEDALE,TX 76060 DALLAS,TX 75354 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: 817/483-0999 PHONE: 214/438-3405 PHONE: PHONE: FAX: 817/483-0899 FAX: 214/438-2849 FAX: FAX: JOB NO: 001-426• AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID $0.00 AMT.BID $0.00 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT I-SS OUTFALL"S-2" 1 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 134 30.12 $4,036.08 46.50 $6,231.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12' DEPTH L.F. 65 32.25 $2,096.25 50.00 $3,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 3 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 10 34.98 $349.80 57.00 $570.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 43 42.55 $1,829.65 67.00 $2,881.00 $0.00 $0.00 5 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12' DEPTH L.F. 24 70.11 $1,682.64 71.00 $1,704.00 $0.00 $0.00 6 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 12'-14' DEPTH-- C.F. 58 58.49 $3,392.42 78.00 $4,524.00 $0.00 $0.00 7 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 87 71.76 $6,243.12 80.00 $6,960.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 117 82.25 $9,623.25 85.00 $9,945.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. 183 103.00 $18,849.00 99.00 $18,117.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE,20' 22'DEPTH L.F. 215 135.55 $29,143.25 106.00 $22,790.00 $0.00 $0.00 NY1 11 15"SDR 26 SS PIPE,22'24'DEPTH L.F. 263 168.86 $44,410.18 123.00 $32,349.00 $0.00 $0.00 12 15"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-12'DEPTH L.F. 100 48.97 $4,897.00 74.00 $7,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 13 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE,6'-8'DEPTH L.F. 433 25.96 $11,240.68 44.00 $19,052.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 8'-10'DEPTH L.F. 561 27.66 $15,517.26 45.00 $25,245.00 $0.00 $0.00 15 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 255 29.79 $7,596.45 48.00 $12,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 16 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 59 31.26 $1,844.34 49.00 $2,891.00 $0.00 $0.00 17 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F7 72 33.99 $2,447.28 56.00 $4,032.00 $0.00 $0.00 18 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 312 37.63 $11,740.56 58.00 $18,096.00 $0.00 $0.00 19 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 182 42.73 $7,776.86 63.00 $11,466.00 $0.00 $0.00 20 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. 60 50.37 $3,022.20 77.00 $4,620.00 $0.00 $0.00 21 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE,20'-22' DEPTH- L.F. 50 63.11 $3,155.50 84.00 $4,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 22 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH L.F. 69 63.23 $4,362.87 54.00 $3,726.00 $0.00 $0.00 23 12"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 96 80.52 $7,729.92 81.00 $7,776.00 $0.00 $0.00 24 12"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 189 98.64 $18,642.96 82.50 $15,592.50 $0.00 $0.00 25 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 0'-6'DEPTH CIS 265 22.97 $6,087.05 41.75 $11,063.75 $0.00 $0.00 26 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 6'-8'DEPTH L.F. 247 24.36 $6,016.92 43.50 $10,744.50 $0.00 $0.00 27 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10' DEPTH - L.F. 426 26.07 $11,105.82 42.75 $18,211.50 $0.00 $0.00 28 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10' 12'DEPTH L.F. 287 28.20 $8,093.40 46.25 $13,273.75 $0.00 $0.00 29 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH Lam- 217 30.92 $6,709.64 53.25 $11,555.25 $0.00 $0.00 30 10"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH - Lam- 52 34.56 $1,797.12 55.50 $2,886.00 $0.00 $0.00 31 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 34 39.66 $1,348.44 47.00 $1,598.00 $0.00 $0.00 32 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 12'-14'DEPTH Lam.- 316 31.98 $10,105.68 54.00 $17,064.00 $0.00 $0.00 32A 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 45 67.52 $3,038.40 80.00 $3,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 1.126/5-2SEW •ARY SEWER OUTFALL "S-2" -JOB NO. 001-426 IIII IIIII . . . . _ . . ._ . ,.. CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 5 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 PATE BROS.CONST. SABER DEVELOPMENT 780 W.MANSFIELD HW P.O.BOX 540186 JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II KENNEDALE,TX 76060 DALLAS,TX 75354 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: 817/483-0999 PHONE: 214/438-3405 PHONE: PHONE: FAX: 817/483-0899 FAX: 214/438-2849 FAX: FAX: JOB NO: 001-426 AMT.BID AMT.BID AMT.BID $0.00 AMT.BID $0.00 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT I-SS OUTFALL"S-2" 33 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 190 35.63 $6,769.70 56.60 $10,754.00 $0.00 $0.00 34 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 16'-18'DEPTH L.F. 64 40.72 $2,606.08 61.00 $3,904.00 $0.00 $0.00 34A 10"SDR 26 SS PIPE, 18'-20'DEPTH L.F. 34 48.36 $1,644.24 76.00 $2,584.00 $0.00 $0.00 35 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE,8'-10' DEPTH L.F. 265 36.58 $9,693.70 60.00 $15,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 36 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 10'-12'DEPTH L.F. 435 44.18 $19,218.30 64.00 $27,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 37 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 12.-14'DEPTH L.F. 105 51.68 $5,426.40 71.00 $7,455.00 $0.00 $0.00 38 8"SDR 35 SS PIPE, 14'-16'DEPTH L.F. 25 64.95 $1,623.75 73.00 $1,825.0a $0.00 $0.00 39 10"PVC BORED CROSSING L.F. 521 180.87 $94,233.27 160.00 $83,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 40 CONST. 12"BORED&ENCASED CROSSINGS L.F. 448 247.95 $111,081.60 218.00 $97,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 41 CONST. 12"BORED CROSSINGS L.F. 310 184.65 $57,241.50 170.00 $52,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 42 CONST. 15"BORED CROSSING L.F. 30 194.83 $5,844.90 190.00 $5,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 43 CONST:16"BORED CROSSING/F.M. 1709 L.F. 147 354.02 $52,132.99 280.00 $41,232.80 $0.00 $0.00 44 CONST. 10"BORED CROSSING L.F. 24 189.50 $4,548.00 140.00 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 45 4' DIA.SEWER MANHOLES(0'-6'DEPTH) EA. 30 875.63 $26,268.90 1000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 46 CONST. EXTRA DEPTH OF 4'SEWER MH V.F. 237 47.36 $11,224.32 150.00 $35,550.00 $0.00 $0.00 47 CONNECTION OF 15"SEWER LINE L.S. 1 84.58 $84.58 1800.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 48 4"SS SERVICE INSTALLATIONS. - A. 21 127.70 $2,681.70 1000.00 $21,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 49 4"PVC SDR 35 SEWER PIPE L.F. 350 10.15 $3,552.50 50.00 $17,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 50 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENTS L.F. 250.00 9.15 $2,287.50 8.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 51 ASPHALTIC ROADWAY PVMNT REPL. L.r.- 1050 37.40 $39,270.00 30.00 $31,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 52 GRAVEL ROADWAY REPL L.F. 750 9.15 $6,862.50 6.50 $4,875.00 $0.00 $0.00 53 CAPPED STUB OUT CONNECT.TO MH EA. 7 116.28 $813.98 500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 54 REMOVE EXIST.SHRUBS L.S. 1 6484.07 $6,484.07 2000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 55 16'STEET GATES EA. 5 377.77 $1,888.85 1800.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 56 TRENCH SAFETY L.F. 6684 2.06 $13,769.04 4.00 $26,736.00 $0.00 $0.00 57 EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM L.S. 1 8457.49 $8,457.49 2500.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT I(ITEM NOS.1-57) $771,641.83 $877,894.05 $0.00 $0.00 __ 12 S.2SEW .. .. S O RY SEWER OUTFALL "S-2" -JOB NO. 001-426 • IIII CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 6 OF 6 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE: FEB.22, 1996 PATE BROS.CONST. SABER DEVELOPMENT 780 W.MANSFIELD HW P.O.BOX 540186 JOB TITLE: SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL"S-2"PHASE II KENNEDALE,TX 76060 DALLAS,TX 75354 TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANT WORK PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: JOB NO: 001-426 AMT.BID: AMT.BID: AMT.BID: AMT.BID: ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE UNIT II-WATER FACILITIES 1 8"DIA. -900 'V "• R PIPE L.F. 1074 19.52 '.20,964.48 30.00 '.32,220.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 6"DIA.C-900 PVC WATER PIPE L.F. 30 17.82 $534.60 40.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 3 8"DIA.GATE VALVE&VALVE BOX EA. 1 510.43 $510.43 550.00 $550.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 6"DIA. GATE VALVE&VALVE BOX EA. 3 362.62 $1,087.86 450.00 $1,350.00 $0.00 $0.00 5 CONST. F.H. INSTALLATIONS EA. 3 1043.1 $3,129.30 990.00 $2,970.00 $0.00 $0.00 6 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LBS. 1063 1.29 $1,371.27 1.75 $1,860.25 $0.00 $0.00 7 CONST. 8"TAPPED CONNECTION EA. 1 1694.44 $1,694.44 1610.00 $1,610.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS EA. 8 114.45 $915.60 400.00 $3,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 1"DIA. POLYETHYLENE WATER PIPE L.F. 254 26.38 $6,700.52 10.00 $2,540.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 CONST.GRAVEL DRIVEWAY REPL. L.F. 45 6.08 $273.60 8.00 $360.00 $0.00 $0.00 11 FURN.&INST.COMP. CRUSHED STONE C.Y. 66 17.37 $1,146.42 30.00 $1,980.00 $0.00 $0.00 '1012 CUT, PLUG&ABANDON EXIST.4"W.L. EA. 1 236.81 $236.81 800.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 I 13 CUT, PLUG&ABANDON EXIST.2"W.L. EA. 1 236.81 $236.81 500.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 CLEAR R.O.W.FOR CONST.OF W.L. L.F. 1074 0.57 $612.18 1.00 $1,074.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT II(ITEM NOS .1-14) $39,414.32 $52,214.25 UNIT III-STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 NECESSARY ROADWAY&R.O.W. COSTS L.F. 1105.3 8.09 $8,941.88 3.00 $3,315.90 $0.00 $0.00 2 STREET EXCAVATION C.Y. 800 5.64 $4,512.00 10.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 3 CONST.8"COMPACTED LIME SUBGRADE S.Y. 3425 1.87 $6,404.75 2.10 $7,192.50 $0.00 $0.00 4 LIME FOR STABILIZATION PROCESS TONS 75 102.62 $7,696.50 113.00 $8,475.00 $0.00 $0.00 5A CONST.5"REINF.CONCRETE CUL-DE-SAC L.S. 1 19486.05 $19,486.05 15000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 5B CONST.CUL-DE-SAC W/6"HMAC PVMNT L.S. 1 12404.32 $12,404.32 13750.00 $13,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 6 ASPHALTIC TACK COAT S.Y. 3176 0.18 $571.68 0.25 $794.00 $0.00 $0.00 7 FURN&INST.6"THICK HMAC SURFACING S.Y. 2540 14.09 $35,788.60 15.75 $40,005.00 $0.00 $0.00 8 4"HMAC DRIVEWAY RECONNECTION S.F. 130 2.15 $279.50 2.40 $312.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 6"COMP.CRUSHED STONE DRIVEWAY S.F. 3000 1.06 $3,180.00 1.20 $3,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 SAW CUT L.F. 88 6.77 $595.76 3.00 $264.00 $0.00 $0.00 11 PAVEMENT STRIPING L.S. 1 1691.50 $1,691.50 1000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 12 FURN.&INST. 18"CLASS III R.C.P.CULVERT" L.F. 196 37.40 $7,330.40 50.00 $9,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 13 CONST. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMP. L.S. 1 3557.79 $3,557.79 4000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 789.37 $789.37 1000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL(ITEM NOS.1-14 $113,230.10 $116,508.40 ERR ERR SUBTOTAL ALTERNATE"A" $100,825.78 $102,758.40 ERR ERR SUBTOTAL ALTERNATE"B" $93,744.05 $101,508.40 ERR ERR GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT BID(ALT."A" $911,881.92 $1,032,866.70 ERR ERR GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT BID(ALT."B" $904,800.19 $1,031,616.70 ERR ERR CR.0 RROR ., i l 1 i t-�4�'-�� {��.J I~•1• cs� 1 11 bey I 6e] 01f2 i3V1tTl - _� 1 /� r-1 Obi f ] • - - uw ',AaJA t i • { .� I -If.ST• \� , dC il 609 ^• -_ eel2 I Ball i \. 1 Y• SURVEY AB T. R I'4 1� :F. 1 eiSS j ,t i 1e}1e3 1e21, I'_ - .•• _ I y f C If 3JT3or 30L3_411 ]E` ) )e ` If� I ! fl9 fA2 1941A i' 3f. 1�1 • IIAIu ' • 12 15 �ge 1vJ I S Sf AcII r fIM ' i-i.i ] 1 n 1_ 1 -•- -• Ti: FI� � 1i3 -� 5 C I 1 9eYI -Fµ ---• 20 ) 6 _ I D _)F2 FIK l 0 (7D6 ,�I 98 I_ ICI . - II_-_-_Sat _� +. -)]f FS" ) L_ • JCI j I -- it i III E- . - _ ._ - .., _4_ -']FI) Z _-~ ---� r�' 3C1 SEv 1 9C - 102 `2/ , S/'yR JL1JIj U�V ( lt1 0-0 �( — 1 � �r- t �}F at'A .vYA SURVEY A85T N4 51. sAI 1 6 6 A- :: I, I `- �sill3ro.u0 .�. L. IeA2A A +A 48 401^ 7C 1 7e 7A 6A 1 60 gaze I T.I .I'' ___ 2.9 re t I Kfl •,,At 1 2 •' izI- I i if _ I ac ` Il 44 19 Ac 3.3 6At 45k "• 66i T-}-.71.0 I i �" -. Ac _ - ;;I 1•_____ 1 I2 4 4 .+ .� I H eI '8 I I( • 41 Aer� -r .� 22 �! I4�elel eB i .I • t I I 1 • I lac 1 • `�' n.I ( JONNSON I R0. i 1 L 1 - 1 1` 1 .�- Lat I , 7. - `1 --- 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 , -- I 1 ---- �j--� C•� 1r IG. I II C C C C C C C C C C C C �y I f0- 3 6 e 7 1r le 2 ] 9 IO 31 32 • 1 I 1 II l 1 1 j �: 1_At _ 1.s'::1A‘iiiiii. 1610 1 E t'•�,{ J ES { 10 At JC.2A-0L •1 I ``All ( 2A3 ' , I1 242 l(KA •item I i 1�- G t IDI !` 626c 6At 12.e AL 1 EL'--- ilib 2I • `�C� I; ' , f1' IBIC ,B . , 2 w ,I l -I A DV- elA i f 1 l 20 Jec I31 1 9.J • 4 1 -�----t -1--- �� '��2F t'# 21,. r:7 • SURVEY ABS 'N4 SOOT , Gi� 20Ac. - — 47C,3 2/I 1 t •_�� 71 ' �- 1 TN A.1( I 2AI I 7a3I I , \1 0 .-- • '2C2CSUEY a:ST. 218 ! 542 :AC iSC • •2+ 246 R, I 3 • p It O 2B II.u3 !.4w!I.I 1141 .i , At ^Nh +" 'r'1 ,G u, I I ppw'[R I 1. [�- -- L._L.J!5. 2W. :. 1 II .J I 3C1. .Of� - I , _AIR' .A 1. I I I .J1 -' I '- .__ ,2 2 At I.3 at .. - A.A. AI A •Sl rt l,l 1 ' I Tel •� I_ • i i - ____., -_.S I1 �•1-!�104c • .R 1511 At .Sa AtIA 'Li C_`IIO■<7 ' P �� iare 1 Fall+4 C I A f l e A r .J �_J 2 L 2A2 I1L�;. A2A ./�/� (� (III '3�JRKJJ ^�f`� I I 3/k..24t 2At 9.eau BtAt —• I - ? `ITQ-U® vMl Al J. Ij HOM PS©L 1. J I - - ---' 6 6A,T 68 662 6 6I ` i I - 33..�� . C I 1IY\, 183 • SURYET 85T N41}02, •�f C.AI6 - i .e 1 .0 • .D i .• 4�•11 ••r;t!��.�., - 1 -,DJ yeat s_f r n 242 {�TI.7- t I ' di I _a� �.f71 • )<S .l Y.tk 1 9e3 Ac 963 Ac 1 l9 r AL 164t 'S�a,llk.�24 AL IiA< , I 6C4 )r_6C2 Acta •� 965 44 t y I 9 I '; )� •62 2A) 2a I2Aa1 f 1 I f__6Cr---f---61'1•If 'I-' t I _ , IE t.a6 1e1 MAI ,e1A r66 At IS At • 1 rr fr�� 1 l t��1 26 K. 6.14c - 6, 2KI I 3Ac I 1 1 1 m I I --� t 1. 4A2 It 662A 1 0 • u.436 xi )r,..3�.�A(�1 I KELLER CITY L/M/T - L i` }A 4A 3I A • I j ; -D' I 1 1 .I It zr k � C�1Rlt7LL {{---�I A ELEAJEgARr 5 ", i` —.-31 Q . dek.i . C L A Y q 9.` C i•-1 fill I \_ SURVE1t LOST,N4346 • !GJ a ,;564, 60 At 4 44 4t 0 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: ISTEA Grant Application Resolution 96-13 Southlake FM 1709 Trail / Signage The NCTCOG and the Texas Department of Transportation called for Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) projects January 24, 1996. These grants are funded 80% federal funds and 20% local funds. Our local funds would come from the half-cent sales tax. The state highway department manages and builds the projects and the City must agree to maintain the project. After consulting with the staff at NCTCOG, our Trail System Master Plan and area cities, I have been working on several projects. One is the Southlake FM 1709 Trail/Signage Project which includes a 1) 7.5 mile ten foot wide concrete hike&bike trail and landscaping on the south side of FM 1709 from Highway 114 to Davis Blvd; 2) re-striping FM 1709 with wide outside lanes for the bike route; and 3) signage for the 91 • miles of bike routes throughout the City which the City will install as routes become available. Total cost is $3,110,779, City's 20% share is $622,155. Attached is the resolution for the City Council to authorize application of this project. Please put on the City Council agenda for March 5, consideration of this resolutions for an ISTEA project. If you have any questions please contact me at 481-5581, extension 757. <IAk_ KM II 5,C1-/ RESOLUTION NO. 96-13 1110 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHLAKE FM 1709 TRAIL /SIGNAGE PROJECT A RESOLUTION FOR THE SOUTHLAKE FM 1709 TRAIL / SIGNAGE PROJECT OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS"APPLICANT",DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR,ACTING FOR,AND ON BEHALF OF THE "APPLICANT" IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "DEPARTMENT", FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ENCHANCEMENT PROGRAM, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "PROGRAM"; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" MATCHING SHARE IS READILY AVAILABLE; AND AGREEING TO MAINTAIN THE PROPOSED SITE FOR PUBLIC USES. WHEREAS,the Texas Department of Transportation has approved the "program" for the purpose of allowing the political subdivision of the State of Texas to participate in the • Program; and WHEREAS,the "Applicant" is fully eligible to receive assistance under the "Program"; and WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is desirous of authorizing an official to represent and act for the "Applicant" in dealing with the "Department" concerning the "Program"; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE "APPLICANT": Section 1: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that they are eligible to receive assistance under the "Program". Section 2: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that the matching share for this application is 20% of the cost not to exceed $622,155 and will be available as required under the "program." Section 3: That the "Applicant" hereby authorizes and directs its City Manager to act for the "Applicant" in dealing with the "Department" for the purpose of the "Program", and Curtis E. Hawk is hereby officially designated as the representative in this regard. • • Section 4: The "Applicant" hereby specifically authorizes the official to make application to the "Department" concerning the project to be known as the SOUTHLAKE FM 1709 TRAIL / SIGNAGE PROJECT in the City of Southlake for the use of enhanced transportation. That the City of Southlake is hereby committed, upon completion of the proposed project for the maintenance of the project as required by the"program." Introduced, read and passed by the affirmation vote of the City Council for the City of Southlake on this 5th day of March, 1996. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTESTED • i City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: ISTEA Grant Application Resolution 96-15 Southlake Hwy 26/Cottonbelt Trail The NCTCOG and the Texas Department of Transportation called for Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) projects January 24, 1996. These grants are funded 80% federal funds and 20% local funds. Our local funds would come from the half-cent sales tax. The state highway department manages and builds the projects and the City must agree to maintain the project. After consulting with the staff at NCTCOG, our Trail System Master Plan and area cities, I have been working on several projects. This project is the Southlake Hwy 26/Cottonbelt Trail which includes 500 feet of a ten foot wide hike and bike trail along the Cottonbelt Railroad from Brumlow south to Big Bear Creek and a bridge to cross Big Bear Creek. This would contribute to the connection between Colleyville and S Grapevine. Grapevine already has a grant for the trail along the Cottonbelt Railroad from downtown to Pool Road (Brumlow). Colleyville is applying for a grant this time for the trail along the Cottonbelt Railroad through their city. Total cost is $240,000, City's 20% share is $48,000. Attached is the resolution for the City Council to authorize application of this project. Please put on the City Council agenda for March 5, consideration of this resolution for an ISTEA project. If you have any questions please contact me at 481-5581, extension 757. dii(. KM • RESOLUTION NO. 96-15 • AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHLAKE HWY 26 /COTTONBELT TRAIL PROJECT A RESOLUTION FOR THE SOUTHLAKE HWY 26/COTTONBELT TRAIL PROJECT OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS"APPLICANT",DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR,ACTING FOR,AND ON BEHALF OF THE "APPLICANT" IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "DEPARTMENT", FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "PROGRAM"; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE; CERTIFYING THAT THE "APPLICANT" MATCHING SHARE IS READILY AVAILABLE; AND AGREEING TO MAINTAIN THE PROPOSED SITE FOR PUBLIC USES. WHEREAS,the Texas Department of Transportation has approved the "program" for the purpose • of allowing the political subdivision of the State of Texas to participate in the Program; and WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is fully eligible to receive assistance under the "Program"; and WHEREAS, the "Applicant" is desirous of authorizing an official to represent and act for the "Applicant" in dealing with the "Department" concerning the "Program"; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE "APPLICANT": Section 1: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that they are eligible to receive assistance under the "Program". Section 2: That the "Applicant" hereby certifies that the matching share for this application is 20% of the cost not to exceed $48,000 and will be available as required under the "program." Section 3: That the "Applicant" hereby authorizes and directs its City Manager to act for the "Applicant" in dealing with the "Department" for the purpose of the "Program", and Curtis E. Hawk is hereby officially designated as the representative in this regard. . • . „ 410 Section 4: The "Applicant" hereby specifically authorizes the official to make application to the "Department" concerning the project to be known as the SOUTHLAKE HWY 26/ COTTONBELT TRAIL PROJECT in the City of Southlake for the use of enhanced transportation. That the City of Southlake is hereby committed,upon completion of the proposed project for the maintenance of the project as required by the"program." Introduced, read and passed by the affirmation vote of the City Council for the City of Southlake on this 5th day of March, 1996. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTESTED S III .5-e3 ' City of Southlake,Texas lioMEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution 96-16 Authorizing the City Attorney to Condemn a Portion of the Goodman Tract for an Easement for N-1 Sewer Line Resolution 96-16 is attached authorizing the City Attorney to proceed with eminent domain for a permanent utility and drainage easement consisting of 0.30 acres. The Developer of Coventry Addition is constructing the N-1 Sanitary Sewer Line (a portion of the Sewer Master Plan), which will serve not only Coventry Addition but several other additions and homes along the sewer line. The sewer line needs to cross property owned by Benjamin and.Mary Goodman, therefore, a utility and drainage easement is required. City Council has previously authorized staff to proceed with acquisition of the easement. The SCity has not been successful in reaching an agreement with the Goodmans. The Goodman property was appraised and a copy of the appraisal along with a final offer letter was sent to the Goodmans. The offer was for the appraised value of a 20-foot permanent easement, a,40- foot temporary easement, and special damages for replacing any damaged trees. The Goodmans did not accept the final offer but do understand the need for the sewer easement. They are concerned about liability that may be associated with the sewer crossing their property. Because staff has not been able to reach an agreement with the Goodmans for the necessary easement, the attached resolution will provide the necessary authorization for the City Attorney to proceed with eminent domain. , Please place this on the March 5, 1996 agenda for the Council to consider Resolution 96-16 authorizing the City Attorney to proceed with eminent domain on the Goodman's property. 6/1 cg--' BW/sm Attachments: Resolution Final Offer Letter Letter from Benjamin Goodman Exhibit A illMap wp611 wpdocs I wthead.mem l agendalgoodman.wpd RESOLUTION NO. ( b-/b • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C IY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR ACQUIRING A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE CONSISTING OF 0.30 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTRIAIE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS;ANDAUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH EMINENT DOMAIN. • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has previously authorized the construction of a sanitary sewer line, drainage and other public utilities in the Coventry Subdivision in order to preserve and protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS,a portion of the Coventry Subdivision sanitary sewer line,drainage, and other public utilities project (the Project) will be located on or across property owned by Benjamin D. Goodman and Mary R. Goodman more particularly described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto; and • WHEREAS,since the original approval of the Project,the City has attempted in good • faith to negotiate the acquisition of an easement across the property described in Exhibit • "A!'; and WHEREAS, the City and the property owner have been unable to reach agreement on the acquisition of this easement; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: L W tes1 N(02r2 %) Page 1 • . • SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, hereby determines that a public necessity exists that requires a permanent easement of 0.30 acres of land more or less, to be acquired over the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof far all purposes. SECTION 2. The City Manager and City Attorney ate authorized to comply with the statutes of the State of Texas with reference to the necessary legal prerequisites existing in or relating to the exercise of eminent domain to appropriate said easement for the purpose of constructing a sanitary sewer line, drainage and other public utilities in connection with the Coventry Subdivision. Further,they are authorized to offer fair market value to the property S _ owner to acquire such easement. SECTION 3. s. The owners claiming an interest in said property are Benjamin D. Goodman and Mary R. Goodman whose mailing address is 1700 N.Shady Oaks Drive, Southlakke, Texas 76092. f tc iaodoux,00r(0212 Pasc2 • o,.3 • DULY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas on the day of , 1996. APPROVED GARY MCKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND, CITY SECRETARY • tV Ics\ .tc tai.aor,aw(osl t96) pug 3 • .1 . ,// VOL m , BEEFY SURVEY 1 tla I f/ wY n A-72 E rr' // ,..t..�. 4�m' r. p t1�'! N 4T41'3a' !'• I......,..- - ..�. Ow,. �-. .� trot e.y'-., i 4° i I 1 20.a' N 8710'2q°w s I . ,... � i N dd'3Th1 E WO 604`44 : g - -i its• f •• 1, Area +• t�. 0 Acres g 47'41'36' w et 13,027 Feet '.q,:. 4.7031 ACRES 1 si E N,IAI P1 OAV� OOCU A t. ET UX ' VOL10733. , PG. 4 oA.tC4.TX. li . THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY A--706 5/a" I.P.F. ----- - _.. tfit• oaf .4 :8 • 1• .2 f I Li Original Scale : 1" 10O Q 3A 11mEiiiiizr ,t, • C aphtc Scale In Feet -4 f * 1 -IAIES '. mum PREPARED FROM A SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND t •Al 1897 -1... OC'T0BER 12. 19 5 `•St I • S U- ES W. BA TLETT R.P.1.4 K. 1807 3209 1 >�tttirt �SCr�t Mein i '. FL Worth. TX ma V (817) 02e-70-n t a YscetL ,ao SANTA S EXHIBIT Ar, AARE:1i-7--95 STCRMA GRAN EA5 V7 (SEE ATTACHED Flf.LO NOTES) S .. _ r1.�ww..r ' i TOTAL P.003 •, 13 _ ? , SURvEY A-12 I SURWY A—1620 1 fjfy , lAl 10 ( EMo t R ovG N, 1 2A2A GA * t 687 Ac IIOI 10Ac ^ ` r _ ` ...", •-5f- ,1 , 2A2 ' - . I ' 10 Ac t I�' f - 1 ]� :t 1 / 2A3 1^D - \ kir ,�L� uAc , mi.__ _ ____ __ 1 K 6t 1 R 1iM8�'' I G ar ; I2C2J \\:.-1- i ‘ -7-----7-1 r i 1),' ' ' 1 x P; 'At-. , w � ft !- -1-1 2F RANI ki' i J - -� LT- - 1 - U P , ,2E, , , , X1- :I x Jam"'30 �� 1 1 � 1) GAR 3H x - IL�''G AUK. 20 , _903 - -- - a-I 3 ~ 3A 2A • 8f 1 8r 8C 80 803 0 381 3Ez At .AG_ _ 26 Ac - I0 ID SURt£Y A-7r. A J -� HEST F,1t?UNO . 11tr� 11@ 8A4 8A 8At1 MI6 8A 8A8A 8M 1 5.53Ac i_ fir- , tIC A t 8A8-" _. I 6 .4 \ a 8A7 A A 88; 1 D 8A3 - 8 A - - - - t BA? BA1S 8A,8AA 8At0 �- - - - f 11 • 8A1 .� I 11C2 11C2A t1C2 98 , ilf 1 ID Q .uLP.; - - `.i 5.4 r ' O. O , — —L— D, ' 6. 1 1 1 1 T 35 Ac c.r.,...d , . . . . , ,.. ,ay..�n♦ - 2C1 ` , I. , , 1 % \J (J 1 t-1-r t • 1 , 11 ME': IA \ �' 11 A2 ._T .• . , `...%�1, :' , 1 ' _ 1/ -at" ,- • il T `, ,,, 0 City of Southlake, Texas 0 MEMORANDUM February 28, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Consider Contract with Pepsi-Cola for Scoreboards at Bicentennial Park With the expansion of Bicentennial Park, six scoreboards are needed for the new fields used primarily by the Southlake Baseball Association (SBA). The Parks and Recreation Board asked SBA to find the type of scoreboards they wanted and present the options to the Board. The Board reviewed the SBA proposal at their February 12 meeting and unanimously recommended that the City enter into a contract with Pepsi-Cola to offset the cost of the scoreboards. SBA had contacted Dr. Pepper & Coca-Cola but found Pepsi-Cola to have the best offer. SBA is also recruiting a local sponsor for each sign to cover the cost of installation. This contact is for seven years. The City had entered into a similar contract with Dr. Pepper for the existing three scoreboards • at Bicentennial Park. The Dr. Pepper agreement was for five years and expired March 1996. The attached contract has been reviewed and approved by our City Attorney. Please place this item on the March 5 City Council Agenda to consider the authorizing the Mayor to execute the Contract with Pepsi-Cola for Six Scoreboards at Bicentennial Park. Please call me at 481-5581 ext 757, if you have any questions. bk_______ KM ccouncil/memoceh CONTRACT IllThis Contract entered into as of the 6th day of February 1996, by and between the City of Southlake (Park and Recreation Department), a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, with its principal place of operation located at 1725 E. 1709, Southlake, Texas 76092, hereinafter referred to as ("Customer"), and Pepsi-Cola, hereinafter referred to as ("Pepsi-Cola"), with its principal place of operation at 4532 Highway 67, Mesquite, Texas 75150. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Customer owns and operates athletic facilities at Bicentennial Park, in Southlake; and WHEREAS, Pepsi-Cola is licensed to manufacture, sell and distribute certain soft drink beverages (Pepsi-Cola products) within certain designated territories of Texas, including Southlake, Texas; and WHEREAS, Pepsi-Cola will provide six (6) signs for the athletic fields in exchange for the City requiring its licensees using Bicentennial Park to serve only Pepsi-Cola products; and IIIWHEREAS, the parties to wish to set forth in writing the terms of this Contract: Now therefore in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows: Consideration. Upon execution of this Contract, Pepsi-Cola will pay $19,900 for six (6) scoreboards for the City of Southlake, all boards to be delivered on or before March 15. Exclusivity. Customer hereby agrees it will require, as a condition of using the City's fields, all concessionaires or associations to sell only Pepsi-Cola carbonated soft drinks at the Bicentennial Park during the term of this Contract any associations or concessionaire shall also be required to buy all of its carbonated soft drink requirements for its operations or functions from Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi-Cola agrees for such term to promptly and fully supply such associations or concessionaires equipment with respect to all cans, syrup and bottles of Pepsi-Cola products, including water and isotonics. Pricing. Pepsi-Cola will sell to Customer's associations or concessionaires,.for the term of this Contract, all of their requirements for soft drink fountain syrup, all of the carbon dioxide required to service to the public in connection with the syrup and/or other • items to be provided by Pepsi-Cola hereunder, all cups used to serve Pepsi-Cola products f:\files\slake\contract\pepsi Page 1 5E3 for the aforementioned items at the prices listed on attachment A. These items shall be • subject to price increase only during an industry-wide nationally recognized increase, and not more often than once every two years. Term. This Contract shall have a term of seven (7) years commencing February 6, 1996, and expiring February 7, 2003. Product Identification. Customer grants to Pepsi-Cola the right to have various forms of product identification bearing the Pepsi-Cola trademark, such as, by way of example and not limited to, signs, posters, and streamers prominently placed at appropriate locations. Placement and appearance of the aforesaid materials shall be mutually developed between Customer and Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi-Cola shall have the right to identify Pepsi-Cola as the exclusive vending soft drink provided at Bicentennial Park. Equipment. Pepsi-Cola will furnish to associations and concessionaires using Bicentennial Park without charge all equipment on an as needed basis. Pepsi-Cola will furnish to customer, without charge, all equipment necessary to dispense carbonated soft drink products. Said equipment is to be mutually agreed upon by the Parties, Pepsi-Cola will be responsible for the maintenance and repair of said equipment during the terms of this Contract, provided that customer and its employees shall exercise prudent care in the handling and operations of the equipment. Title to said equipment shall remain with Pepsi- . Cola and said equipment may be removed by Pepsi-Cola upon termination of this Contract. Independent Contractors. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to make or create by and between Customer and Pepsi-Cola any relationship of agency or partnership or joint venture. Pepsi-Cola will be responsible for the maintenance and repair of said equipment during the term of this Contract. Title to said equipment shall remain with Pepsi-Cola and said equipment may be removed by Pepsi-Cola upon termination of this Contract. Events of default. Upon the happening of any one or more of the following events, this Contact may be cancelled and terminated by the Non-Defaulting Party hereto upon written notice to the other party: A. Any material, breach of any one or more of the terms of this Contract, which breach is not cured within twenty days of written notice by the aggrieved party to the defaulting party. B. The insolvency,bankruptcy,judicial liquidation or reorganization,appointment or receive or trustee, or corporate dissolution by, or on behalf of either party. S f:\files\slake\contract\pepsi Page 2 5E 7 Nonassignability. This Contract is not assignable by either Party without the prior • written consent of the other party. This contract shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Customer and Pepsi-Cola and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Nonwaiver. This Contract contains the entire understanding of the parties thereto and superseded all previous Contracts and understandings between the parties. No failure by either party to exercise any power given the hereunder or to insist upon strict compliance by the other party of any obligation hereunder, and no custom or practice of the parties shall affect either parry's rights to demand exact compliance with the terms of this Contract. Cancellation. This Contract may be terminated at any time after 84 months by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Upon termination of this Contract, all equipment, including the scoreboard(s) furnished by Pepsi-Cola,shall be returned to Pepsi-Cola,except that Customer may purchase the scoreboard(s) on a prorata basis, based on the seven (7) year term of the Contract. If the Contract terminates after '84 months, the scoreboards shall become the property of Customer, without charge. Governing Law. This Contract shall be construed in the accordance with and shall S be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. Venue in any proceedings relating to this Contract shall lie in Tarrant County. In witnesseth whereof, the Parties hereto have executed this Contract of the date first set forth above by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized. The Parties hereto represent and warrant that they are fully authorized to enter into the transaction contemplated by this Contract and that the representatives of the Parties whose signatures appear below are duly authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective Parties. • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Curtis Hawk, City Manager Date PEPSI-COLA 4 -L 772-� 2 3 SAu oriz Repre ntative - Title Date f:\files\slake\contract\pepsi Page 3 ATTACHMENT A • PRICING $11.00 5-Gallon Tanks Pepsi Orange Slice Diet Pepsi Red Slice Mountain Dew Root Beer Dr. Slice Lemon Lime Slice 20 Lb CO2 $10.50 Plus $25.00 Deposit Cups 12-oz 2000 41.25 16-oz 1000 32.75 22-oz 1200 46.50 32-oz 500 31.50 Allsport • 20-oz 24 11.30 Aquafina Water 20-oz 24 9.50 • f:\files\slake\contract\pepsi Page 4 City of Southlake,Texas • • MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Appearance by Southridge Lakes Homeowners Association Tom O'Mally, president of the Southridge Lakes Homeowners Association, was scheduled to address Council regarding all-way stop signs in their subdivision. Mr. O'Mally contacted staff and stated that he will be out of the country during the next Council meeting. There will be another representative acting on behalf of the Southridge Lakes Homeowners Association. 6711 BW S • 6 '`,- City of Southlake,Texas S MEMORANDUM February 28, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: / Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Appearance: Tom O'Malley, Regarding Stop Sign Requests in Southridge Lakes Blvd. Mr. Tom O'Mally, the president of the Southridge Lakes Homeowners Association (H.O.A.), is to address Council on a perceived traffic problem along Southridge Lakes Blvd. They are asking for stop signs to be placed at three intersections on Southridge Lakes Blvd. Mr. Larry Huffman, Lee Engineering, was hired to conduct an All-Way Stop Analysis of the intersections. On November 30, 1995, Mr. Huffman and I met with the H.O.A. and presented and discussed the results of the analysis. Since that meeting and based upon the concerns of the citizens, Lee Engineering has conducted a Pass-Through Trip Analysis and Southlake Department 0 of Public Safety has conducted two traffic surveys. Attached are: • All-Way Stop Analysis: The analysis shows that the intersections do not meet the warrants for all-way stop signs. • Pass-Through Trip Analysis: The traffic passing through the subdivision accounts for about 15-16% near F.M. 1709 and about 25% of the traffic near Ravenbend. • "Traffic Patterns on Southridge Lakes Parkway" -This study shows that the average speed was 30 MPH. • • My notes of the H.O.A. meeting. G4 BW/sm Attachments wp61 I wpdocs I wthead.mem l agenda I sthridgtr.wpd S i .Z31 v oi il a . ••_(-•_ utti _I.de! . • vt • ' I i -t%% ,L. _ Lq. .;":.. . Z• \ . '111/1...,: A . - - , : yti . p.. - 1 --k -V c. „...,.• .: - , . ..AT. 1.iv•• .0 , - , . ... - -. ) , . 0 >‘" I. 1 •L'7 --) .. . - - .i., .v-- v. - 0100; . /007Q • zei •' -; -",c • 1 • .- - ..tt•,^7"- • - ' I At. ;,-• \oi •)'-- . 4 ! ... ,. ..- ...' 'A., ' „I :r< ii.v. -y. ,. .'•,..v - P • . 001P 00G '10° 0 9‘arCP _ _ - -• simin 1 im -g -Ecru" ,..= , • . .. • - i. .\--4-- .sr-IL.-r t• — -S3 , p . 1111111 4111...1.0 41•1•••• ) P 7V St gt . • •--4-• li. • • • • . : prewi. • 664 ,,,. ° •• -• ,-r , r----.:: : - 3 i.••••'.. • . 1 - - - %' . _. .!__ .". • --. . . • l'k - • • , I :. .- 0. . -ila•; 1‘ .,_ w. .-" i 0 4 i_._ i ! it) i L.-. ---- :. .. ....--.1--e-TL--<- i'lli... ..) e .'s. ! . -i '‘,A. • . .., e. ' • II - TN .40 , ' % -)‘.; ---: r--. . :.- .1"-,g --1 `• , a ; ,..• • ----i 7 "...ye 41, • '‘• : ‘ \-i\--- 1 -1:._. --. .-. liusiii • • - ...' is..,., _,..4111it "6.1": r ,• 4, • .. 4 ;1, :1,-' r..... ., ..., _ , ..... ),../. 4.1:-. 1pp ,,N.,..... .44.,..r: •--_._. .... t._. .7; ...... . , ,AVar. V i i - 1 . .Y l• . • \ --- -1 .-. iii i ... " ' ---. I ii 1 , , • ... 1 .... G....... • ...w.f.:Iii,;...,„‘ 1... ., -..,, i i ! i ii ! . %,. ....--i•- . a • •--\ .,- 0s i : ire. . 45 . , .(p.m-4k.... ., . i i i"i•.;"-ii— ..' ' II'• i -- ; ---A---1. - ..e- - . I-1--- ) ‘ " L • • , . -. i N....... li. ih. . . . .„ .... ./..y.„-,,,r. '....,... \ i ' ‘ • t / 0- %-.... .. 7-1.>" 0 goo"* .4, •••••• raz • i ; \ • -• % , 1 -3.• •!:„ - %,_ -2, .3-el. i 1111. i- .. '''. y' . '•.,.. .4: ei:.,I, ..,4 \ ••24.1411% ... : '4 Da • ‘ i X ! i -4.:-"' ik .-"r- i 1:. . .%'Nt 0! lk- .. • et 689-i \le--1/4 4 1- - ! / -)4....L.,.' ,L.., i i r • ---i .... .,. , ....„ ...A. , i ••••, -..• <- , , I. .'• 1...t. Sr • N. -,_ ...• • . . • ... s.k.":440, „tire 7 . .:a a i N., -.• • '"N. .AO.10."a•JO _ i 0 li N....., -ge-A.,,,j__/...• -0r - -""`-.„, i....-....- 21--,20-1 I $ ! "VI •i, ' 'air I. a+ .4 -..-..r.....ist ' i i .4 . 44ti...33 ......... .n." • -1. i k i ! ny .€1/47.-- ...164. ..,..i ...-1-1--—I-.. ---• N .2 Atj.11 -' •J • 1 1 ' ' ••••1•: t % i • 40 100IN ' 1111.17,. 1%. W 0 ‘ i ; : iiiii1VA. Me i i a los t., • / ..k . • , . i i i't • ..or.:%%ft i 1 ! i ! • 4_1„Ti..g1.-/-1--r 13 - g ! ,.t. % 1 g \- . ........v.... -E-.• -14-.4' ..,; iiiiii 11•111 -3 . IIIM o'c : i r•-... \ :, • _.... I 1----1 k i fa! . - , 7 .1, it( illii! • . -%. iv b.••:. ,....-spo ' T...ge.• ' a , e. % •••?-.4 i i, / , • '4%4,.„. $ si 1 : 1 -, , .f... -.. i i i i i ! ' ;'• ,."1/2 i ! • „,*- t.• ' 4 ‘ i l t . . ----------w ..wee;tov'e'• 6 ----k i nu =II Mt 1 , iiiil # • • i /- ‘ t • iii1 ,,,..k / ' 'e • -1, -... —r---i I •• . 0 %i . - --- .... ..........?, / ...)! ..---"": \ -% • -iii: ......... i ! i • • •......... , /8 .41 • -11•01t,e-011 .•..er.sill. . ,... i .1111111:Cf:--.• • • / i ,-.... . 0; I. '( • I i • i ! Di 1 Or " 1 • • • -• - 8 6 I / i je• if ----.. -- . g .. , -.. . • .. • ,-.0 ...2...,„ ,...tfrall ....•- i........ „t. •. I _...... --):0: .,,..-- till 1 \ i '"••• . na i al ; , - ..• - •,-„,., s • • ; , r ® 1995 5323 SPRING VALLEY ROAD r. S SUITE 230 DALLAS,TEXAS 75240 214/701-9663 FAX 214/701-9669 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS `'EE EncinuERinc / November 27, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re:All-Way Stop Analysis Dear Mr. Whitehead: In accordance with our agreement dated October 26, 1995,we are pleased to submit the final report • for the multiway stop analysis. The final report incorporates your comments on the draft report as conveyed during our telephone conversation on November 17, 1995. I look forward to the opportunity to meet with you and the Southridge Lakes Homeowners Association at 7:00 p.m. on November 30, 1995, to discuss the report. Please let me know when your City Council will consider this issue, so that I can make plans to attend their meeting. It has been a pleasure working with you on this project. If Lee Engineering can be of assistance to you on this project, or other traffic engineering projects,please contact me. • Sincerely, . 4/IY iiiiiiv''' Larry V Hoffinan, P.E. Vice President Enclosure S 6 4-3 • Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis for Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (South) Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (North) Prepared for: 111 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Prepared by: • Lee Engineering, Inc. 5323 Spring Valley Rd. #230 Dallas, TX 75240 ��CP�£OF 7fiS a: LARRI(y. F! ` d November 27, 1995 ' ': ;�3i • ,I Dti Y • MULTIWAY STOP CONTROL WARRANT ANALYSIS The City of Southlake,Texas has requested that an analysis be conducted to determine if all-way, or multiway, stop control is warranted at three(3)intersections. These intersections include: • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(South) • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(North) This report summarizes the results of the multi-way stop control warrant analysis for the intersections. The analysis is based upon existing traffic volumes which were collected on Thursday, November 2, 1995. Additionally, the report provides recommendations for traffic control to alert motorists to the possible presence of pedestrians crossing Southridge Lakes Parkway at the intersections of interest. The analysis is based on the multiway stop control warrants contained in Part II-B "Regulatory Signs" of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(TMUTCD). Three warrants are included in the manual for warranting multiway stop sign installations. These warrants include: 1. Installing multiway stop control as an interim measure while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, 11111 2. An accident warrant, and 3. Minimum traffic.volumes. Intersection Geometries • Southridge Lakes Parkway is a four (4) lane divided roadway at the intersections with Pecos Drive/Sabine Court and Brazos Drive (south) and a two (2) lane undivided roadway at the intersection with Brazos Drive(north). The posted speed on Southridge 1:akes Parkway is 30 mph. • • Pecos Drive/Sabine Court and Brazos Drive are two lane residential streets. The intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway with Pecos Drive/Sabine Court is a four-leg intersection. The remaining two intersections are three-leg intersections. Warrant Analysis Warrant 1 The first warrant allows for multiway stop control as an interim measure to control traffic while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, if the traffic signal is warranted and is urgently needed. Traffic signals have not been warranted at these intersections. This warrant is not met for any of the intersections. • Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis-Southlake Texas Page 1 • Warrant 2 Warrant 2 is satisfied when five or more reported accidents, of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation, have occurred within a 12-month period. Based on accident data obtained from the Soutblake Police Department,a total of two(2)accidents has occurred at all three intersections during the past four(4)years. Neither accident is of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. This warrant is not met for any of the intersections. A more detailed description of the accident history is included in the Appendix. Warrant 3 Warrant 3 is based on minimum traffic volumes and delays. It is satisfied when both of the following criteria are met: a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours,with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour. These criteria may be reduced to 70% of the above requirements when the 85-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph on the major street. A speed study was not conducted to determine the 85-percentile speed on Southridge Lakes Parkway.. The posted speed limit on Southridge Lakes Parkway is • 30mph. The analysis was conducted for the-full warrant volumes and the reduced warrant volumes to determine the effect,if any, of the 85-percentile speed on the analysis. The traffic volumes for • the three intersections are included in the Appendix. At each intersection the eight (8)hourly periods with.the highest number of vehicles entering the intersection were identified. The average total vehicular volume entering the intersection over the eight(8)hours was calculated and compared to the criteria contained in portion"a" of the warrant. The average total vehicular volumes entering the intersections are: Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court: 286 vehicles per hour Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(South): 245 vehicles per hour Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(North): 195 vehicles per hour The average total vehicular volume entering each intersection does not meet the minimum volume criteria based upon the full volume warrant(500 vehicles per hour) or the reduced volume warrant (350 vehicles per hour). Additionally,the average minor street entering volumes were determined for the same eight(8)hours and compared to the criteria contained in portion "b" of the warrant. The average hourly entering volumes for the minor street approaches are: • Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis-Southlake Texas Page 2 , • Pecos Drive/Sabine Court: 32 vehicles per hour Brazos Drive(South): 64 vehicles per hour Brazos Drive(North): 34 vehicles per hour The average minor street volumes also do not meet the minimum volume criteria for any hours of the day based on the full volume warrant(200 units per hour) or the reduced volume warrant(140 units per hour). The delay criteria were not evaluated since the minor street volume criteria are not met. The minimum volume criteria are not met for any of the intersections based upon the full volume warrants or the reduced volume warrants. Alternate Warrant Using Volume and Stop Delay The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(TMUTCD) also provides an alternate set of warrants which utilize traffic volumes and delay to determine the justification of multiway stop control based on minimum traffic volumes. This warrant is presented in Appendix B of the TMUTCD. The warrant states that traffic volumes at some intersections reach a point where it becomes more desirable to permit a large total intersection delay under multiway stop control than to permit long average delays to vehicles stopped under two-way stop control The warrant provides a table which is used to determine the volume threshold where an increase in total intersection delay • under all-way stop-control is more favorable than an undesirable average delay time to stopped vehicles under two-way stop control. The warrant also provides a figure for estimating average delay, over a fifteen minute period,for stopped vehicles under two-way stop control for use when delay data is not available. Using this table, average delays to the stopped approaches were estimated for the three intersections for the peak four(4)hours at each intersection. Based on the figure,the average delay for all stopped approaches under two-way stop control was estimated to be less than 5 seconds per vehicle for each fifteen(15)minute period assessed and over the four(4)hour period. The data used in this analysis are presented in the Appendix. This magnitude of delay for the stopped approaches under two-way stop control is very desirable and reasonable. Based on this magnitude of delay it is not recommended that multiway stop control be warranted under this alternate warrant. View Obstructions - Site visits were made to each of the three intersections to determine the existence of any view obstructions that could possibly impede the vision of motorists as they attempt to enter Southridge Lakes Parkway from the side streets. With one exception, the visibility of motorists on the minor streets is not obstructed. The one exception is located on the northeast corner of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (south) and involves an electrical vault surrounded by large screening bushes. A westbound motorist, stopped at the stop sign, encounters difficulty in seeing southbound vehicles on Southridge Lakes Parkway. S Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis-Southlake Texas Page 3 6 °-7 .., • As a general rule,traffic control devices should not be used in an attempt to mitigate an undesirable situation caused by a view obstruction, especially if the view obstruction can be removed. Since this view obstruction is located within the sight triangle established by city ordinance, it is recommended that the obstruction be removed. Until the vault and screening bushes can be removed or relocated, it is recommended that a stop line be placed on Brazos Drive (south). Since vehicles will not be expected to stop at the stop sign,the stop line should be placed at the desired stopping point,which is closer to the curb line on Southridge Lakes Parkway where the view obstruction is not a factor. Stop signs should not be installed on Southridge Lakes Parkway in an effort to offset the effects of the view obstruction. Traffic Control for Pedestrian Crossing An assessment was done to evaluate traffic control to alert motorists of pedestrians crossing Southridge Lakes Parkway. As shown in Figure 1, it is recommended that an advance crossing sign (W11-2) be placed on the Parkway in advance of the intersections. The signs shall be placed approximately 325' in advance of the intersections per Table 11-1, A Guide for Warning Sign Placement Distance, of Part ll C 'Warning Signs" of the TMUTCD. The signs shall be black legend on yellow background and shall be 30"x30" in size. If installed, the signs and installation shall comply with the requirements set forth in the TMUTCD. These include a mounting height of at least seven(7)feet and a lateral clearance of two (2)feet from the curb face. These are shown in Figure 2-1, Height and Lateral Location of Signs- Typical installations, of the TMUTCD. • Pedestrian crosswalks were considered as part of the assessment. Part III "Markings" of the TMUTCD, states that crosswalk markings should not be used indiscriminately and that crosswalks should only be marked at intersections where there is substantial conflict between vehicle and pedestrianmovements. Crosswalk striping tends to give a pedestrian a false sense of security. Often pedestrians feel that the crosswalk striping gives them the right-of-way and that vehicles will stop for them. As a result they may tend to pay less attention to approaching vehicles and carelessly step into approaching traffic. This can create an extremely dangerous situation. Based upon the accident data obtained from the Southlake Police Department,there were no pedestrian accidents reported at the intersections in the past four (4) years. Crosswalk striping on the non-controlled Southridge Lakes Parkway approaches is not preferred. Conclusion The results of the multiway stop control warrant analysis show that existing traffic volumes do not warrant all-way stop control. None of the three(3)warranting criteria provided in the TMUTCD, or the alternate warrant criteria provided in Appendix B of the TMUTCD are met. Therefore, it is recommended that only the minor street approaches continue to be stop controlled. It is further recommended that the view obstruction at the northeast corner of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(south)be removed. As an interim measure,it is recommended that a stop line be installed on Brazos Drive(south) at the location where vehicles are expected to stop so that •the motorist's view of approaching southbound vehicles is not obstructed. Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis-Southlake Texas Page 4 < Install W11-2 (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) (North) Brazos Drive Instal1 qj ‘.\\•CN. W11L-2 Il (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign), • ,ecti 44. • a; • tp.O, .V- stall W11-2 4?e'cP (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) SAL -04 • Coopi .• nstall W11-2 (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) EnanzEginG Figure 1. Pedestrian Crossing Traffic Control • Discussion of Accident History • The multiway stop control warrants contained in the TMUTCD include a warrant based upon reported accident history. The warrant is satisfied when five or more reported accidents, of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation,have occurred within a 12-month period. The types of accidents susceptible to correction include the following: •.right-turn collisions, • left-turn collisions, • right-angle collisions. As stated in the report, a total of two (2) accidents has occurred at the three intersections during the past four(4)years,neither of which is of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Both accidents occurred at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway/Brazos Drive(south). A brief description of each accident follows: Accident 1 Date Occurred: 10/12/92 S Description: Vehicle turned south onto Southridge Lakes Parkway. Lost control on wet pavement and ran-off-road. Accident Type: run-off-the-road . Correctable by multiway stop: No Accident 2 ' Date Occurred: 12/02/93 Description: Vehicle parked on the adjacent access road was struck by a secondary vehicle in passing. Accident Type: fixed object Correctable by multiway stop: No S -// OO—NNN-000OOOOOOO—M M y vv 0 V 0v;W W 7-R�+fR(y O f)° a0 -W gR(p nvsnnR{� v�n Y,R(p v v Winop vp(pn On ggRN8 W W g2 R N22"N N v"vN m cO M O N--O N N v v�O 1n M M N(V N(V N N IV N N{V N(V N N�-N{�l M A N N N N M f9 IV N(V t9 0'1 P�to(V 8,92mmm2i,Si000c0yee`lo`1'pi,anoodonmvtomdoo000d0002g2g DOWOOOD00O0OOO0000000W,00000000n0 ao0000nnn 0}�n OinOOOQ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 fi ��pp ry p p �n �p(p(p fp�7 �y�n�n�n �7 (y�y N�y v{� p�p�pm� e�pp W WW v v M M M M M N N N v 0 0 0�M Y 2 n g W W W�n h h 2 88 Y f Y v v v W Yi v g 2 2 82 8 g g g g 3 P m 22 W m W 0 0 0 0 E o O if N N 2 N v Y v v N N 0 0 0 E O fp W E Sa 8 u) A " > p ((y� (pp ��yy p py p (p ry (�^p N_ (� ry p p �y N O O - O 0 0 O v v N----N N M Y7 O-8 CO')Y n O G N 2 t+0)5 t)+ N N N N n(WO 8 N 8 Mrs n a h 2 8,S f0^W N(V N N N N N t09(7 8 N N 2 t0.g.M o0')CM)Cn')8 M tD N m 8 n 6 2<o M N W 8 a oni(V m(V 8 tD' 2 OOO 1-•-0000000000,NNNN"-NvvO lamN(�OnvMMvvvNVC,12f�phln';V� OC,WztOC,I;C,C1N"lnnt+)MNMOWOnvvMN000V1Nv- 00 Nm (V O . V a p7 O o��O O O O o O O O O O O O��"N N M(D�O f'�O!�`�` �N N f0 N M M v v M N N O•-N o N N O�c0 W�O��W��N N�n N N v nD�n f0 OWN fD NNW^��W N W n N f0 v M v N M N��o 0 L fV (V m MN OOOOO"--�-OOO�- MvIn V NCl 428m `F�`87-W OO 22gna0 f�n8222 g trimgnn 22 W m z W DU)U O�m6 D O OOU,O V W n U tNh Y 0vN(V f`9 A{0J(V n n OM Y)u') V 1 Yqq ' �y Wap ��pp vy��nn �p op ^ �y �ryp p(p �p ZOOOOOOinMM•-'O---e-000O NNM O W NNp 22 8 Onn OO2828EM mnnhne0 6 N ONINro gnm3828nnP W NN N(V 00)r M NoN')No o W W nS v2N • <<< <d$d$d$dpd$ddp<d<d$d$d$d<d<dd$ddd$d<d$d¢dsp$dp<d$d<d$d$d$d$d$d$d" �d$dn<d$dp$d$dpapaaNaaapaaaapaaaaaa1nnaaaaaapaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa O�8,48:e0')YO12MpOrMOS°CO')O$�MvBt8')vO�MvS 'OS�M08r-80OYSr-(n:Bw,8OS'0M'QS�(8V8'08 O�MOO�MOSr-MOO�CO')O8�8'48:2MVO 000E0(�000000000E in 0(�(pp(pp((pn•000 ri0 i0 i00 0 Ol "oOoo•••••• ••IV(`l f�`l(l0 0 •0�.j �.j 000 M0p v Nan�n�n(�pp•(�pp(•pp•0(p............W W 0000� OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OO`O`OOOOO OOOOOOOO 8•-��ci t-i•-il000 OOggS1000 0000a000000`00 apM ¢ pQp ¢ ¢ ¢ p p aspaoaaapaaaapaaaapaapaaaappaapaaapaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaapa � 4 BV-MVOr-Mv0�10�)OOvMOO.2MOO�MVO�MOO�M08'.9.8v$�MvS�8V8r-848P800�(800�170000vS�t�)v0�(h08r.thYOrcO')OO'ggv$�MOOr-M08 p 6j <`I(V v:IV Eggs N.••• ggi g Y V V< in NN.••••• ••1�1�1�8 of gz,3 88g88 G GG C �1`I6"464��tee (�ry ggi+l N)'V'C PNNin Yl(pfp(p(p n nnn M m cootp�8 of o 00 0 J U •'��" O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O�•-��— • • III1 • • Alternate Warrant for MultiWay Stop Control Using Volume And Delay • Location: Southridge Lakes Parkway @ Pecos/Sabine Avg. Delay Total total for Stopped Entering Stopped Veh. Hours Assessed: Volume Volume (Figure 1) 07:15 AM - 07:30 AM 6 73 <5 sec 07:30 AM - ; 07:45 AM 21 82 <5 sec 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM 13 91 <5 sec 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM 11 75 <5 sec 321 02:45 PM - 03:00 PM 10 78 <5 sec 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM 9 92 <5 sec 03:15 PM - 03:30 PM 8 84 <5 sec 03:30 PM - 03:45 PM 7 73 <5 sec 327 04:45 PM - 05:00 PM 11 80 <5 sec 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM 8 81 <5 sec 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM 1 60 <5 sec 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM 9 91 <5 sec • 312 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM 7 75 <5 sec 06:00 PM - 06:15 P.M 9 108 <5 sec 06:15 PM - 06:30 PM 13 96 <5 sec 06:30 PM - 06:45 PM 10 101 <5 sec • Avg. Veh. Delay(stopped approaches)over 4 h <5 sec 380 PHF: 0.88 PPF: 0.88 • • • • ^NNN O NNN^0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0""00 0" p O N m m NnN M 1f� N pp m r^^O N N m^^Y m N Y N Op1 m M m pp O m^N m O m N N Y N N r N N N N r m^m O r W^ ^N N Mm.00M1, w 00f 0 V,Mn Mmmm0.f 1,00NO V OC,010 nnr10,0,1 N,0,00 NN 00 rr mN Y M M M N NNM M M N^^ ^ ^ m0°YPI m S SSN weaNtO r-1 SS Y Orm0 S 0SSm t00nm 00m0°m 0a00m m01m�,n0M0r mamo 000ano 000t00000mmm 0O0m mm 00D 00 m m nnm0 m 0000000 m m C C o 0 o O o o 0 0 o W W o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O o o O O C o 0 0 O 0 0 O o 0 o O C O C G o O O o o O O G O o O O o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O C O O o 0 o G o 0 0 o O C O o O o O C C C O o o C C O • YYY YY MM MM.-^00^^^"NMmmmmN m'J NOrArnnN Nvi Yf m O`Of Yf ONE tm9Y,YY'01f010 nni0t0O W0 m�0�D mIM.m00m b,rr O o MO m Y YY`V VMM O mNN m'W m m m N N E7 ES • o - 888E888888E8888888888E8888E888888888888888888888.888888888888888888888EEEE88888EEE8888E2228EE8 > p (p�p m �p(� N (p O0 e� rr {♦� nn mm (� NN (J oo f V a°" O""N^OO^^NM Yn^R4i218 m t8i^t" npigt388vml2RE4f 1442Se9ime'J1'l •m 2mN W.m^iV NNN NNCINNNNNNNN 82 NN 0 m 0r.o h cA4 H.N.mm:N NN N N 2i 0> lV 01 lV (�^NN N M NNN^00 0000000^^Om0 N fD NmmF�tf Yf�Nr m��t'!Y)1A e,�� nN�7 NY n0Y7 Y90nn�n0Y1"f 1A Nmf 00 H 49 vf fD rr tDN Y C')t'1{'1 N NNC!CNY N N��m Or a0^ iV fD a0 t0 t0 t'!t'!t'! f'! ^ m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 �0 ^ (�pp (p (�pp �y♦ (p N N YN00000^^^^00^^NMYN^"fVN N.4.0,00,W 1,0,h0h NNhOm 0.4 4 `of nV,,V V V Vf NW V..r1n h 00m Wr-W W mnnr W WO V Y v OOMM N"NN^^^MN N^M N CO W On • �y (p $ ZNfDNMMMMMM�-0000000 o^NN Mm OJ"f04 h1�eW WC m 00 t0W wNN1010 t0 o0,0.f;00r.N0 W00 W ooON V hrNNN n my v,. �.ul mN o 0 o m m r0 mm n m:eMO N e00N N Y • 2 3 �d�d�d�d�Q�d�d�d�d�dd�$d�d�d�d�d�d�d�d�d�d�d$d�d�d$d$did$d�d�d�d�d�Udid$did$d�d�d�d�EEREEEEEEREEREEREEEREEEEEEREHEEEEEEEEEEEZERHEEa p m pNj O N O N O N O N O N O N O N o N O N O N O N O N O N O N O^O N O N O N O N O N 0^f09 Y 0^V v O^N v O^n p O^m v O O'O^M Y O^M Y O'"h .NI 0^M'O^M Y O^M Y O^M"f O Z a O!�M Y O^M Y ^M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y ^M Y O Ci 0 O O O `^^G^ •••• ••riooco ip:rui000 .• ••.. ..omooi00000 ooi0000 V"•• "1JVVV•••••• eiriiiei.iveoeopo i0. 00 0ioeoi000c�� 0 0 0 0�gg s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o�o�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.-^^^^^^^^.-^^o 0 0 o s��o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0��o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ o g G i i i i i Q E E R E E E d E a a R R E E E E pE E 1 E a R a a a a E a a a a a a E d E p1 1 E a a a a a a 9" O NON O NONONO vCi.-mN ONON O NO N ONONONeNO^04.00^NYOO^�O'V O^0 V 0'0 YO^,O, vp.-09 Yo" 4.O"n`Nf o"n f o"m Y o"m Y o....m Y O"CO' v o"n r o R C O^M Y O 0 00 0 0 0 f O'-M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y O^M Y o G m ........ .... .. ........ .. .... .... .... .. .. .... .. .. .... .. .. ... .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. 1 D """"o 00,00 000M00000 Y 0000�''pp.tp.(p.0.o...00000000 �p.is is..0000000 W OOOO"r��(,NNN 00000 yN.0 MM MYYY 00000 o(p tp 0000000000000 rrr r 0 a0a0 a0 m mm m 000 0^ J U N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • • • • 4111 1111 ® Alternate Warrant for MultiWay Stop Control Using Volume And Delay Location: Southridge Lakes Parkway© Brazos South Avg. Delay Total total for Stopped Entering Stopped Veh. Hours Assessed: Volume Volume (Figure 1) 07:00 AM - 07:15 AM 16 54 <5 sec 07:15 AM - 07:30 AM 25 59 <5 sec 07:30 AM - 07:45 AM 30 78 <5 sec 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM 20 73 <5 sec 264 02:45 PM - 03:00 PM 15 59 <5 sec 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM 26 88 <5 sec 03:15 PM - 03:30 PM 15 68 <5 sec 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 14 68 <5 sec 283 04:45 PM - 05:00 PM 18 84 <5 sec 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM 9 60 <5 sec 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM 16 67 <5 sec 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM 14 77 <5 sec • 288 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM 18 79 <5 sec 06:15 PM - 06:30 PM 18 69 <5 sec 06:30 PM - 06:45 PM 28 90 <5 sec • 06:45 PM - 07:00 PM 14 65 <5 sec 303 Avg. Veh. Delay(stopped approaches)over 4 h <5 sec PHF: 0.84 PPF: 0.94 1111 • ® IIII • • 0 000000000000000.UN U++++uw-a 00000000 N NNNp++t�++•0000 mfODt00 mOG, W OOo W V J V V Q)8 W NNOOn O•.O•.•a0.•!O.0.•140i O,l fOdNNNNO o00 N NN N o O +0 0 0 O m f0 f0 m Oo 0 W W V J V V W 8 O� fJ 0 fJ fJ O N O N O N O N m N O N 0 N ONO N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 01 0�0p�p U O N O N 0 0 0 0 O N Oy�0p%O N O N O 0 0 0p O DN O N 0 N 0D N 0 N 0 0p 0 N O ND Oy N 0p DN 0 ND 0 N>0 Ny 0 N 0D N 0 0D 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 pN 0 ".O a W+O i.C.f+Gi.4i+0I.4f+G1.4f+C I.tJ+•• J.ff r +••�DD.O yy►.fDD.f p+•DD•Da>DW ryyO DDa DwDD+>DG DDa 4l pr yyG JDD.tDDi D+yG J>D.pw Dr DDO Da 4>>i>+C ya w>D+>O Ayy.G>Di>r>DC JDD.t>DJ+>DO JDD.L>Dfp+yyG C �33W2li 3333��3�3233 2H22iEi 2222ii2Wanninnnii3i3 3i333i333ninn i3333i nnn �•'• N+++r 0000 m.000000000•o 044040J,1,t00011�011 0 f00040•f 00.R0p,,+0, 0++NfJ±N+++p+0000 f000000000000040400000000000000t0f00 1�tT• s,J,.J.fif•i NNNN0000 �C O tT O N O.ON O00M.0.ONO M0 .T O.ONO.ONON�pONON ON ONONO0000fA 0N0 y0y00y0(yy00N pp0 DDNDDOCDT D0DtDDODDU.Ny yOy DND AOA>>N DOD ANpON pOp>N>>>ON OCCTODND>O>DND DOD DND DODfD0D DOD DDN>O>MDDO DND ppO vIg �n 33M33�MKCKMMKK333KKMMKKKM3K i3��3�3,3.�3�3 t222 nnin iii3ii3niMinninn333innnn -0 • /NJ(,t ct,af mm op cp mm op cp cp wpu omf qq wq fO,,1�ut,� t,�u q Cf.1 u� 1J �• N o wmJ m J.W W m W O m w JtNi�N m Oa+ovlJ..W W.mi COTN+O.m11.W O W G+moon momCi C11♦NOS;F5'i'+�O u W NN+tO.��O a7mNN+oJ m wo 000000o wow 5 a J mN Na C. �1 CJ u�t�O�u+�+uur W m�tmi.�V Hrro�m++WOaa�mm+vuwiN W u,eomJuutaoo m��caaimNONN+1Tomtb aiNNN+W Na+00000NNNN+NNNa 0 W 0 O m 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000W NN N CCii CtJJ NN NN((,,,,11 t� NN NN N N N �7 y (T CCaa g O N N N w+wm 0a W mm mtT wm m W NN E,1 J.OIO mN O+NJtTOOCaim W 4Ld�Na+W a Nwamocao w W J+O+N VN++.01 mr O+mmo NNOO o00000000000000 og N J ppaa N mm NN N Ny iv C�+1a 44 Jo:p p pC6 0+p J 00fnuu�NL NN NNWmWNW0mvJWNOUWNJONNON+a JJ +thOVNUONraiv O � NNJNmNC JNW+OOa1•NONa+00000WWWWNWWWJOoc Ogg�] i G aug 0 0 • c • N NN pp�� m m �tTT�tpT tt,��y(� yt� NN R O N J++++m JJN Omm mO NOOO NN V J V JNJJV V Oo++mOmmJttNN NNrrttA ONe m ONe I.tTtwTtTNJ JON.O W O W W+JJNN++++w w+oo000wwwwNN N Nmm 00000000 m0 p0 p0000000000000000000000 W0W000 m0m0000 m0000m0m000 p0 00p00ppp000'0 pop 000000000Cp(tpm00oCoi000 mmmmmco cop 00000 .tiN 00:0 aaJ Oem W+W r+w a k W+W OmotJiatJJ+vV N V O2 tJJIJJ.l.000m 22g:8aJSgtnm O+r°4. S2m W NJ OOOO W AP:N 0gN W CAM W BAN NNC.RCAM w owo�cW+ NNN Ct,a,1 W(�,�fCCa,1NNaa y(�aa N NNNNrN ppNNNN NNNN W Nm MOtTQt,�NN+ 0 NNN W+WO Oa Co mmm U W mm CoNw tTa mm W N O+N: g W O W ISi W L1 iJ14:3 ti N W am N N NCo W Co J+O+NJ oua W++W mJO+mm NN N000000000000000000 Alternate Warrant for MultiWay Stop Control Using Volume And Delay • Location: Southridge Lakes Parkway c Brazos North Avg. Delay Total total for Stopped Entering Stopped Veh. Hours Assessed: Volume Volume (Figure 1) 07:00 AM - 07:15 AM 8 47 <5 sec 07:15 AM - 07:30 AM 14 51 <5 sec 07:30 AM - 07:45 AM 25 76 <5 sec 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM 14 59 <5 sec 233 02:45 PM - 03:00 PM 4 57 <5 sec 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM 14 69 <5 sec 03:15 PM - 03:30 PM 12 53 <5 sec 03:30 PM - 03:45 PM 13 61 <5 sec 240 04:15 PM - 04:30 PM 11 54 <5 sec 04:30 PM - 04:45 PM 5 68 <5 sec 04:45 PM - 05:00 PM 20 87 <5 sec 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM 5 52 <5 sec. • 261 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM 20 87 <5 sec 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM 5 52 <5 sec 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM 10 47 <5 sec • 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM 7 51 <5 sec 237 Avg. Veh. Delay(stopped approaches)over 4 h <5 sec PHF: 0.68 PPF: 0.93 • l01 n"/7 5323TE SP230RING VALLEY ROAD • SUI DALLAS,TEXAS 75240 ._r 214/701-9663 FAX 214/701-9669 .�T �' LEE EncinEERInc f B, 2 0 \996 WA February 7, 1996 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Subject: Pass-Through Trip Analysis Southridge Lakes Parkway, Southridge Lakes Subdivision Dear Mr. Whitehead: We have completed our study to determine the amount of traffic passing through the Southridge Lakes Subdivision on. Southridge Lakes Parkway. This letter report documents the data collection and summarizes the study results. • Study Methodology For this study, a license plate survey was conducted to determine the amount of pass-through traffic on Southridge Lakes Parkway through the Southridge Lakes Subdivision. License plate numbers (last 3 digits only) were noted for all northbound and southbound vehicles at two points along Southridge Lakes Parkway. The time(hour and minute)that each vehicle passed the data collector was also noted. A 100 percent sampling of vehicles was collected during the data collection period. The data were entered into computer files and analyzed by a program which compares the license plate numbers of vehicles entering and exiting the study area for northbound and southbound directions of traveL The program identifies matching license plate numbers for a given time intervaL For study purposes, a 3-minute time interval was used as the maximum time for a through vehicle to pass between the two stations. The analysis program was developed in FOXPRO by Lee Engineering. Data Collection The license plate data were collected on Southridge Lakes Parkway at Raven Bend and Southlake Boulevard on Thursday,January 25, 1996. The data were collected between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. The data are on file at Lee Engineering's office, and a copy can be made available if needed. 110 , a During the data collection period, a total of 252 northbound and 519 southbound vehicles passed by the data collection station at Southlake Boulevard. A total of 158 northbound and 116 southbound vehicles passed by the data collection station at Raven Bend. Study Results Northbound Traffic The results of the study indicate that a total of 55 northbound vehicles entering the study area at Southlakes Boulevard passed through the Southridge Lakes Subdivision, and exited the study area at Raven Bend. These 55 northbound vehicles account for 22% of the northbound traffic entering the study area and 35% of the northbound traffic exiting the study area. The remainder of the northbound traffic entering the study area (78%) have destinations within the Southridge Lakes Subdivision. Likewise,the remaining 65%ofthe northbound traffic exiting the study area originated from a location within the subdivision. Southbound Traffic The results of the study also indicate that 41 southbound vehicles entering the study area at Raven Bend passed through the Southridge Lakes Subdivision, and exited the study area at Southlakes • Boulevard. These 41 southbound vehicles account for 35% of the southbound traffic entering the area and 8% of the southbound traffic exiting the area. The remainder;of the southbound traffic entering the study area(65%)have destinations within the Southridge Lakes Subdivision. Likewise, the remaining 92%of the southbound traffic exiting the study area originated from a location within the subdivision. Total Traffic The results of the study indicate that a total of 96 vehicles passed through the subdivision during the study period. The 24-hour traffic counts collected on Southridge Lakes Parkway on November 2, 1995,reveal that about 19% of the daily traffic on the Parkway occurs during the three-hour period from 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM. Based on these two findings, it can be extrapolated that about 500 vehicles per day(vpd)pass through the Southridge Lakes neighborhood. These 500 vpd account for about 15-16% of the traffic on the Parkway near Southlake Boulevard and about 25% of the traffic on the Parkway near Raven Bend. While data were only collected for 3 hours of the day,it is anticipated that this data is representative of the daily pass-through trips on Southridge Lakes Parkway through the Southridge Lakes Subdivision. A summary of the collected data is provided in the attached table. • • LEE cncin22Rlnc 4� f9 • If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. It has been a pleasure • working with you on this interesting project. Sincerely, --Proli /' Larry V. offimn, P.E. Vice President Attachment Ill • • . . c:\1095\1095.03'passthcu.wpd • LEE EfCIfEEf1f1C 6/9 -a6 Results of • Pass-Through Traffic Study on Southridge Lakes Parkway Data Collection: January 25, 1996 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. Northbound Traffic Total Number of Vehicles Entering Study Area at Southlakes Blvd. 252 Total Number of Vehicles Exiting Study Area,at Raven Bend: 158 Number of Pass-Through Vehicles: 55 Number of Vehicles Observed Percentages Non Non Location Total Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Southlakes Blvd. 252 55 197 22% 78% Raven Bend 158 55 103 35% 65% Southbound Traffic • • Total Number of Vehicles Entering Study Area at Raven Bend 116 Total Number of Vehicles Exiting Study Area at Southlakes Blvd.: 519 Number of Pass-Through Vehicles: 41 Number of Vehicles Observed Percentages Non Non Location Total Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Pass-Thru Raven Bend 116 41 75 35% 65% Southlakes Blvd. 519 41 478 8% 92% • City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM January 5, 1996 TO: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Traffic Patterns on Southridge Lakes Parkway Attached are two traffic surveys conducted between the 100 to 600 blocks of Southridge Lakes Parkway. The working parameters are contained in the memo from Sergeant Brown to Deputy. Director Gary Gregg,with the accumulated data on page 2 of each memorandum. The first survey was conducted by Traffic Officer.Buddy Sanders on Friday,December 15, 1995. During that time the high school was in session. The second survey by Officer Sanders was conducted on Thursday, December 28, 1995 during the high school closing for the Christmas holidays. • If you have any questions,please contact Deputy Director Gary Gregg or myself 06Z. BC/bls attachments • City of Southlake,Texas• S UPf&EEf1 MEMOR ANDUM rL, 3 C L c? �t December 16 , 1995 � ,t`L are Zi___ TO: Gary Gregg , Director , Police Services FROM: Ben A . Brown , Sergeant , Police Services SUBJECT : Traffic Survey / Southridge Lakes Parkway The traffic survey ordered for the 300-600 block of Southridge Parkway was conducted by Officer B .R . Sanders #139 on Friday , December 15 , 1995 . The speed measurements were taken from various locations between the 100 and 300 blocks of Southridge Parkway , providing accurate speed data on northbound and southbound vehicles between the 300 and 600 blocks . Officer Sanders utilized a cordless ATR Stalker handheld radar to gather the speed data and conducted the survey from an unmarked Dodge ynasty police vehicle . Iliehicle speed data was gathered from 0700 hrs until 0900 hrs and from 1330 hrs until 1600 hrs . The following statistical information was prepared in spreadsheet form for your review: ( 1 ) Number of vehicles travelling the road per 15 minute interval ; ( 2 ) High , low , and average vehicle speed per 15 minute interval ; ( 3 ) Number of commercial motor vehicles per 15 minute interval ; ( 4 ) Number of CMV speed violations ( 5 MPH + over limit ); ( 5 ) Number of non-CMV speed violations ( 5 MPH + over limit ) . See attached spreadsheet for vehicle speed information . Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this material . Respectfully submitted , C Ben A . Brown #154 ' Attachment . c : Billy Campbell , Director of Public Safety 1111 f/9- .Q3 • 'I - City of Southlake,Texas • Page 2 - Memorandum Traffic Survey December 16 , 1995 TIME SLOT # VEHS # CMVS # VIOL # CMV VIOL HIGH LOW AVG 0700-0715 13 01 00 00 34 21 27 0715-0730 33 01 03 00 39 19 29 0730-0745 41 02 02 00 40 21 28 0745-0800 36 03 05 00 39 21 30 0800-0815 59 01 08 00 41 21 30 0815-0830 43 02 09 00 45 16 30 0830-0845 24 01 03 01 41 23 29 0845-0900 36 01 03 00 39 21 29 1330-1345 15 00 05 00 41 30 34 1345-1400 38 01 14 00 41 21 32 1400-1415 38 03 14 01 49 20 33 1415-1430 36 00 06 00 -44 26 31 1430-1445 23 00 08 00 43 19 23 1445-1500 34 01 13 01 41 21 31 1500-1515 21 03 03 00 • 45 25 31 15-1530 33 03 10 . 00 37 24 33 0-1545 35 01 10 00 42 22 33 545-1600 29 00 13 00 42 21 , 33 AM WEATHER CONDITIONS:. FOGGY , DRY , COOL . AM SEGMENT AVERAGE : 35 1 .5 4 .1 0 .1 . 39 20 29 PM WEATHER CONDITIONS: PT CLOUDY , DRY , WARM . PM SEGMENT AVERAGE 30 1 .2 9 .6 0 .2 42 25 31 OVERALL - QTR HR AVG: 32 1 .3 6 .8 0 .1 40 . 22 30 BAB/bab S • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM1111 December 28 , 1995 TO: Gary Gregg , Director , Police Services FROM: Ben A . Brown , Sergeant , Police Services SUBJECT: Traffic Survey / Southridge Lakes Parkway The second traffic survey ordered for the 300-600 block of Southridge Parkway was conducted by Officer B .R . Sanders #139 on Thursday , December 28 , 1995 . The speed measurements were taken from various locations between the 100 and 300 blocks of Southridge Parkway , providing accurate speed data on northbound and southbound vehicles between the 300 and 600 blocks . Officer Sanders utilized a cordless ATR Stalker handheld radar to gather the speed data and conducted the survey from an unmarked Dodge Dynasty police vehicle . icle speed& data was gathered from 0700 hrs until 0900 hrs and from 0 hrs until 1600 hrs . The following statistical information was prepared in spreadsheet form for your review: ( 1 ) Number of vehicles travelling the road per 15 minute interval ; ( 2 ) High , low , and average vehicle speed per 15 minute interval ; ( 3 ) Number of commercial motor vehicles per 15 minute interval ; ( 4 ) Number of CMV speed violations ( 5 MPH + over limit ); ( 5 ) Number of non-CMV speed violations ( 5 MPH + over limit ) . See attached spreadsheet for vehicle speed information . Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this material . Respectfully submitted , Ben A . Brown #154 Attachment cc : Billy Campbell , Director of Public Safety - _ City of Southlake,Texas • Page 2 - Memorandum Traffic Survey December 28, 1995 TIME SLOT # VEHS # CMVS # VIOL # CMV VIOL HIGH LOW AVG 0700-0715 12 00 02 00 40 22 29 0715-0730 2.3 02 01 00 35 21 28 0730-0745 24 00 03 00 38 25 30 0745-0800 33 00 08 00 44 20 32 0800-0815 29 01 07 00 41 18 30 0815-0830 34 01 04 00 38 26 30 0830-0845 31 01 05 00 38 19 29 0845-0900 23 01 05 01 40 20 31 1330-1345 43 00 14 00 40 16 32 1345-1400 47 00 12 00 38 23 31 1400-1415 33 03 09 00 38 25 33 1415-1430 32 00 13 00 41 22 33 1430-1445 24 00 07 ' 00 41 27 32 1445-1500 38 01 09 00 41 24 29 1500-1515 26 02 10 00 41 14 32 5-1530 26 00 08 00 39 18 . 30 -1545 25 01 10 00 42 18 31 .5-1600 17 00 05 00 38 25 • 31 AM WEATHER CONDITIONS: SUNNY , DRY , COOL . AM SEGMENT AVERAGE : 26 0 .7 4 .3 0 .1 39 21 29 PM WEATHER CONDITIONS: SUNNY , DRY , COOL : PM SEGMENT AVERAGE : 31 0 .7 9 .7 0 .0 39 21 31 OVERALL QTR HR AVG: 28 0 .7 7 .0 0 .0 39 21 30 .. BAB/bab S City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM December 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Notes on Meeting November 30, 1995 7:00 - 9:30 p.m. Approximately 50 in Attendance Staff: Bob Whitehead Larry Hoffman, Traffic Engineer - Lee Engineering • Larry presented his final Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis for Southridge Lakes Parkway. As his report showed stop signs were not warranted, his analysis was not well received. • • After they vented their feelings about the poor design of the subdivision, ie. - a major street through it- and how could the city approve such a design, we eventually arrived at the true perceived problem. That was speed of the traffic: • Both Larry and I stated that in national studies, they show stop signs do not significantly impact motorists speed. In fact, there is usually an increase in speed between the signs. A small number of those present may have heard us. • Larry's analysis did not include a speed study. However, the speed factor was considered by reducing the volume warrant as explained in the report. • A second concern was kids crossing the Parkway. This was not resolved as unwarranted stop signs do not provide safety at intersections, in fact they may lead to a false sense of security. • A third expressed concern were three areas with vision problems. 1. Pecos @ Parkway (may need to modify landscaping to improve sight distance) 2. S. Brazos @ Parkway (identified in report) (need to have power company move box) 3. N. curve for southbound traffic.(N. of Brazos) two driveways apparently can not be seen for speeding traffic (no answer for this problem) 1708 Pecos one of homes need to investigate - signage or improvements III • •Notes on Meeting November 30, 1995 Page 2. • Discussed the Thoroughfare Plan and the update. 1. Parkway is classified as arterial/collector 2. Because N. Peytonville is also arterial the update may downgrade SL Parkway Note: the H.O.A. will actively pursue changing the designation from arterial to local. I stated that even as a local street with the present volumes, stop signs are not warranted. However, a local street designation could help in the political decision. • Residents asked if the north end of SR Parkway could be "gated" or traffic from N. Peytonville stopped or diverted. They will probably approach Council to: 1. allow a temporary closing (gate) now. 2. alter Thoroughfare Plan changed to permanently close the Parkway. • There was also interest in getting involved in the next Road Bond Task Force with the idea of improving N. Peytonville from Ravenbend to F.M. 1709. S. The residents asked for the following ideas to be implemented: 1. increased enforcement by police • 2. placement of "children at play signs" (PW will do ASAP) 3. Rerouting of thru truck traffic to N. Peytonville 4. Paint stripping S. Ridge Parkway a. one lane each direction with designated bikeway (one lane traffic will reduce gaps for cross traffic and pedestrians) b. strip for two lanes and where it transforms to one lane each direction. • • • City of Southlake 1 • lr September 9, 1994 Mr. Tom O'Malley Maya Southridge Lakes HAB Gary Fickes 202 Southridge Lakes Parkway Mayor FroTem: Southlake, Texas 76092-2827 Jerry Farrier MMichell Ri harme Dear Mr. O'Malley: W.Ralph Evans Stephen W.Apple Sr. I did receive your request for the placement of stopsigns on Southridge Parkway.'Jon Michael Franks Andrew L.Wambsganss Believe me that I have been working on the request. I and other members of my City Manager, staff have looked at the intersections you have suggested. I have two basic concerns Curtis E.Hawk on the placement of stop signs on Southridge Parkway. Assistant City Manager. Shana K.Rice In my opinion stop signs at the suggested locations are not warranted. I base this on City Secretary: the following: Sandra L.LeGrand • The Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Southlake classifies Southridge Parkway • as an "Arterial" street from Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) to Brazos Drive and a "Minor.Collector" street from Brazos Drive to N. Peytonville Ave. Without getting into "what and why" ofthe past, I think we all can agree that Southridge Parkway will function as a collector street in comparison to the residential streets in the rest of the subdivision. • •The City of Southlake follows the 1980 Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Manual). This Manual establishes warrants to justify any traffic control device. The "Stop Sign" section of the Manual is enclosed. It is my opinion that the suggested intersections do not meet any of the warrants. The Manual is used because it is the State of Texas approved manual, used by Tx-Dot and all,Texas municipalities and is defendable in court. To use any other standard or to not use the "Manual" would expose the city to potential liability. • Many studies have been conducted nationwide and prove that unwarranted stop signs do not reduce speed,, can increase accidents, and can increase pedestrian exposure and accidents as they rely on the stop sign to stop traffic. I have enclosed a recent article on this subject. I would suggest that the Homeowners Advisory Board consider one or some of the following ideas: "-a9 667 North Carroll Avenue •Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 •FAX (817) 488-5097 Mr. Tom O'Malley Page 2 • Retain the services of a Traffic Engineer to conduct a study of the intersections to possibly "warrant" traffic control devices; • Improve the sidewalk system to concentrate pedestrian at a-crosswalk that could be marked signed, and even lighted with flashers. A crossing where there is a median to use as a pedestrian safety island would be suggested. The traffic engineer can study; or, • Advise on the location of a pedestrian crossing. Note on the article enclosed "ADA Crosswalk Rules Apply to Local Agencies." • Improve the sidewalk system to allow the pedestrians to cross at the signalized pedestrian activated crosswalk at Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Let me assure you that the City staff is ready and willing to work with you, with our capabilities and.expertise, i.e., no traffic engineer.on staff, and the laws, rules and regulations we must follow. Sincerely, agetzzaLL„, Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works wpfiles\wthead\omally • • �/9-3v 0 Do . ° ltiway Stop Signs Increase Safety? ADA Crosswalk Rules Article suggests concerns about use of multiway stop signs Apply to Local Nearly every transportation employee 1. Compliance.Several studies have Agencies knows of a request from citizens to put shown that there is a low level of corn- Even Those Not on the up an all-way stop sign at an intersec- pliance in situations where stop signs Federal Aid System tion in a residential area in an attempt are installed,but are not warranted to control speeding.A recent article by based on nationally adopted standards. The section of the Americans with Patricia B. Noyes in the Institute Of 2.Speed Control.Speeds are reduced Disabilities Act regarding curb ramps Transportation Engineers'ITE Journal, at the point of installation,but the effect at crosswalks has great impact on all January 1994,describes the efforts of on traffic approaching or leaving the state and local highway agencies — the staff of the Boulder (Colorado) controlled location is negligible. throughout the United States.According Transportation Division to determine to the final rules issued by the the effectiveness of multiway stop signs. 3. Safety.After installation, in some Department of Transportation in the You'll want to read the original article, cases the accident rates increased, in Federal Register, all existing marked but the following excerpts will whet your others they decreased,and in still oth- and unmarked crosswalks for which interest: ers there were no significant changes. state and local governments are respon- 4.Motorist Delay.In an unwarranted sible,whether on the federal aid sys- Multiway stop signs usually are situation,delay is minimal on the side tern or not, are required to have curb requested to address speeding and ramps by Jan.26, 1995. safety problems in residential street and overall delay increased sig- areas...There is a common belief nificanfiy by the required stop of all traf- This requirement applies regardless of among the general public that stop fic on the main street. whether any other highway or street signs provide relief from traffic 5. Excessive Restrictions on the improvements are being made. speeding problems.On the face,it Public.If unwarranted,the use of stop Therefore, the requirements must be wou appear reasonable that signs creates a great deal of frustration met in addition to whatever other con- es proaching a stop sign, and disrespect for traffic control devices. struction you may have planned for the have to slow down.How- next two years. ever,studies conducted nationwide 6.Effects on the Environment.Un- PayAttention! have shown that the speeds with- warranted use of stop signs increases in a block of the stop signore either air pollution, noise impact,and fuel You must pay attention to these things! unaffected by the stop sign or, in consumption. A judge from a U.S. District Court in some cases...motorists actually 7. Pedestrian Exposure.Where there Philadelphia recently ordered a city to increase their speed to make upfor is a stop sign,vehicles are present at install curb ramps on all streets on the inconvenience[ofstopping]. an intersection for a much longer pert- which contracts were let for resurfac- ed while they slow, stop, and acceler- ing since Jan. 26, 1992.That was the Stop signs are used to improve the effective date for that of work stat- safety of an intersection by assign- ate.This increases the exposure time type ing right-of-way;therefore, corn- of pedestrians to vehicles and reduces or ed in the ADA.Recognizing that the city pliance with stop signs is essential eliminates the natural gaps in traffic at had estimated the cost of curb ramps for their effectiveness.Several stud an intersection by increasing the time throughout the city.to be$141 million, each vehicle is present. ies have shown that in situations the judge said the court was aware of the heavy burden facing the city. where stop signs are installed but S. Tort Liability. Variations from are not warranted...there is a low accepted warrants without document- Still,the judge maintained a rigid stand, level of compliance.In these cases, ed exceptional conditions present poten- saying,"It is unfortunate that Congress, motorists were observed either tial liability concerns. If a stop sign in enacting this type of legislation,often rolling or running a stop sign.When installation could be considered irre- fails to provide the means of financing a driver does not believe that a sponsible or in clear contradiction to the obligations it imposes." How true! restrictive sign appropriately re- accepted standards,liability suits could Please recognize the fact that state and fleets the conditions,the driver often result. local governments face a great liability disregards it. risk here because they provide so much Printed from The Roadster, Virginia of the service and accommodations that The article suggests a number of con- Transportation Technology Transfer people with disabilities need. Many cerns about the use of multiway stop Center.January 1994 small towns, townships, and rural signs at• tersections that do not meet counties don't have time to study this natio ndards. matter, nor do they have the luxury of assigning someone to do so. Please see Crosswalk, page 6 101 d , 1994 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES (w.)\/ HOMEOWNERS Al)VISOR Y BOARD RECEIVED ios ; 3k DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS • August 3, 1994 • MR. ROBERT WHITEHEAD DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 NORTH CARROL AVE. SOUTHLAKE,TX. 76092-8898 • Dear Mr. Whitehead, As you know the residents of Southridge Lakes are concerned with the traffic situation on Southridge Lakes Parkway. When the Parkway was built,it was erroneously planned as a thruway on the Master Plan for the City. How this could have been approved was beyond the resident's comprehension. We questioned the City as to why they would divide our development with a four lane Parkway. We questioned why four lanes of non-stop traffic would be funneled between half of the development and the playground,swimming pool,tennis courts and amenities'areas of our development. We questioned the safety risk to our children who would have to cross these four lanes of non-stop traffic. The City of Southlake reviewed their prior decision and voted to reduce the Parkway from four lanes to two lanes. They voted to relocate the next phase of the Parkway so that it would not be a straight thruway. This would keep the traffic on Peytonville Road which did not bisect a development and was already approved to 81 feet width. Needless to say,the residents were very grateful for the character and reasonableness of the City Council. That background brings us now to 1994 and the near completion of our development,which will connect the Parkway to Peytonville Road. During the last few years we have experienced an increase in traffic due to growth of our development. This traffic will continue to increase once the Parkway is connected to Peytonville Road. • There are over 500 children(and counting) in our development which increases the risk factor of an accident involving children crossing the Parkway. The number of complaints about speeding to the Southlake Police Department are on the increase. The number of citations issued for speeding on the Parkway are increasing monthly(Thanks to the entire Police Department and keep up the good work.). - • We feel that it is time to slow down the thoroughfare and give our residents and children a few safer locations to cross the Parkway. IiAB94 LETTERSISTOPSIGN 1 1994 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HOMEOWNERS ADVISORYBOARD III We have spoken with the Arvida Corporation and they have orally committed to install the stop signs after your approval. This should result as no cost to the City to approve our requests. The contacts at Arvida are Mr. Bret Johnson or Mr. Jeff Gastrin(214-390-1190). The Residents of Southridge Lakes through the Homeowners Advisory Board request that the City of Southlake approve three(3)stop signs at intersections along the Parkway as follows: 1. Four way stop signs instead of two way stop signs at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway with Sabine Court and Pecos Drive 2. Three way stop signs instead of a one way stop at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(South end of Parkway). 3. Three way stop signs instead of a one way stop at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(North end of Parkway). Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 817-329-2149. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to our request. , . Sincerely, 1...........012/11. dzeley TOM O'MALLEY SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HAB 202 Southridge Lakes Parkway Southlake,Tx. 76092-2827 / fr L.,,y(' . ,,, go . ,.• ......„ :.• , , .",,,, 0 \• ,' w V'' (' cc: Arvida Corporation ?, • r HAB Board Ridge Rap Newsletter no -; " n. 0 III , - ,. I-IAB94\L.ETTERS\STOPSIGN 2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT:;' Ordinance No. 480-190, Second Reading ZA 95-127, Rezoning and Concept Plan/Southlake Commons REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Southlake Commons, being approximately a 29.516 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529, Tract 7A LOCATION: Southeast corner of S. Carroll Ave. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNERS: W.E. and Dorothy H. Dalton APPLICANT: First Gulf Group Development, Ltd. OURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR DESIGN,' " '. Retail Commercial and Office Commercial NO.NOTICES : tr Seven(7) RESPON ' S: Three (3)written responses received within the 200' notification area: • Jeff Avery(Avery Edwards Custom Homes), 17814 Davenport Road, 041 Suite 115, Dallas, Texas 75252 and Dave B. Marshall (Murchison SuiteDallas, Texas Properties, Inc.), 1445 Ross Ave., 5300, 75202, is opposed, "As owners of the adjacent residential property to the south,we are concerned about the effect of lighting,the adequacy of the landscape buffer and the appearance of the masonry wall." (See letter received February 1, 1996.) • Kevin Egan, Huntington Homes(Sanders&Assoc. Custom Builders), 16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 2300; Dallas, Texas 75248, a builder in Oak Tree Estates, is opposed to the rezoning for it will be 4110 inappropriate and impact the value of the neighborhood and it's marketability. (See letter received February 2, 1996.) • Jon C. Napper (Husseini - Smock Joint Venture), 4222 Hallmark, Dallas, Texas 75229, is in favor: 1) enhance the retail opportunities 7A-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK iiiRD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING , ARCH 1, 1996 AGE 2 within Southlake, 2) improve the overall retail image of the region, and 3) improve the value of the properties. (See letter received February 8, 1996.) Thirty-four (34) written responses received outside the 200' notification area: • Errett and Shelly Bozarth (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1300 Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092,is opposed to the rezoning change due to them relocating to Southlake for the "historical precedence of a rural atmosphere and the existing zoning". (See • attached letter received January 23, 1996.) • Elizabeth Hartman (Timarron, Phase II, Village of Bent Creek Resident), 1365 Bent Creek Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, the proposal will provide "a positive image and needed services to Southlake residents". (See attached letter received January 23, 1996.) • J.A. Browne (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1308 Forest Hills Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed: too large, opens center up to too many operations,no longer a local type of center(bars,lodges, • and clubs),there are already two movie theaters(multi-screen)within 2-3 miles of location,noise and traffic will have bad impact on area, and property values could suffer. "I purchased property in Southlake to get out of traffic." • Michael Toon, 4155 Briargrove, Dallas, Texas 75287(is purchasing. a house in Oak Tree Estates,Phase I,at 1221 Forest Hills, Southlake, Texas 76092), is opposed, "Regarding the subject of a property rezoning request, I believe the line of cooperation between the city and a creditable development company should be drawn and held when it directly impacts adjacent residential areas." (See attached letter received January 25, 1996.) • Mary & Bill Tinsman (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1315 . Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed, "We do not want additional 'night' activity." • David W. Watson, 1204 Hidden Ridge #3018, Irving, Texas 75038, apparently is intending to buy a residence in Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, at 1308 Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas • 76092, is opposed. (See attached letter received January 30, 1996.) • Loree and Dennis Green(Oak Tree Estatates, Phase I, Resident), 404 Edgemont, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed, "This change will not only lower the value and appeal of all of our homes but the appeal of Southlake in general. What brought us to Southlake in the first S place will now be destroyed. We are very opposed." • Craig and Linda Kay Smith (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1303 Forest Hill Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, concerned and disappointed, "about the city considering a proposal to change the 7A-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK 0 RD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING ARCH 1, 1996 AGE 3 zoning". (See letter received February 5, 1996.) • Dianne Neville (Oak Hill Estates Resident), 560 Truelove Trail, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor: 1) quality development, 2) fits beautifully with the future goals of keeping the inevitable growth of the business community in our town'positive, and 3) one central area bringing our citizens together. (See letter received February 7, 1996.) • Kimberly S. Evans (Stones Lake, Phase I, Resident), 1402 Richmond Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor for it will provide the following: 1) quality shopping and restaurants, 2) a center to gather with friends and neighbors, 3) significant tax dollars, 4)E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) from looking like an inconsistent, assorted collection of odd types of businesses, shops, eateries, strip center, etc., 5) great job opportunities to our teen age and college students, 6) window of opportunity to attract and acquire such a top notch retail/entertainment center. • Linda Hayes (Stone Lakes, Phase, I, Resident), 202 Manor Pl., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake desperately needs an upscale shopping center. I would rather see a project like that instead S of more of the same strip center, offices, etc." • Mr. and Mrs. Kerry W. Brennan (The Dominion Resident), 811 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor, "I(we)feel it could improve property values and character of this area -- much more positively than a strip center", "make Southlake a different and desirable place to live and shop," and "keep out tax dollars here". • Mr. and Mrs. Norman Christensen (The Dominion Resident), 809 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Commercial development in Southlake is inevitable and this proposal is the type of development we would like to see happen in Southlake." • J. M. Lewis (The Dominion Resident), 801 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We would prefer to have a quality • development instead of strip mall." • Laurie Goldfeder(Stone Lakes, Phase I, Resident), 210 Manor Place, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I think a development of this nature will compliment the Southlake neighborhoods and bring more tax revenue to our City." • Jody Hanson (Stone Lakes, Resident), 1306 Lakeway, Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We need high-end retail in Southlake. Its classy design will blend with neighborhood." • Carolyn Hill Morris (The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake needs a commercial S development of the quality proposed with Southlake Commons. It will be an asset to our town." • Tom Morris(The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor, "I would much rather see a development such 7A-3 , MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK 0 RD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING ARCH 1, 1996 AGE 4 as Southlake Commons rather than the usual 'unsitely' (unsightly) strip mall." (Response received February 19, 1996.) and "an upscale shopping center such as the one proposed by Southlake Commons would be a real plus for our city". (See letter received February 5, 1996.) • David P. Rowland (Stone Lakes Resident), 1000 Normandy Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We believe that the shopping center will enhance the value of our property and also provide significant tax revenue to the City of Southlake." • Thomas V. Stephen (The Dominion Resident), 711 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Barry and Glenda Sorrels (The Dominion Resident), 405 Alexandria Circle, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake is in great need of shopping areas in the community so those dollars spent can help our City instead of Dallas and Fort Worth and an upscale shopping area would also enhance the-look of the community. Please make this a reality!" • Gary D. Robertsen (The Dominion Resident), 614 Dominion Dr. S Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor"will enhance property values and quality of life in Southlake area." • Victoria Binggeli (The Dominion Resident), 807 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "wonderful for tax base" and "The property plans would enhance the charm and distinctiveness of Southlake." • Mary K. Canfield (The Dominion Resident), 703 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We need upscale commercial development in Southlake to set the trend for future upscale commercial development." • Sharon Carlen (The Dominion Resident), 705 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I believe this would be a wonderful project for Southlake. We need a high-end speciality shopping center to compliment our town." • Stephen G. and Diane Krusey (The Dominion Resident), 701 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "See a need to broaden the City's commercial tax base. Also would like not to have to travel to Dallas North Park or the Galleria for high-end shopping stores." • Cynthia L. Brissman (Stone Lakes Resident), 1240 Lakeway Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "an upscale retail center with Jacobson's Department Store and others in a plaza setting". ID • Ann Bullock(The Dominion Resident), 403 Bayou Vista, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake needs a speciality center that is unique. No more strip centers! Southlake has high end residential areas and needs unique high-end specialty villages. This is a good 7A-4 , MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK 0 RD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING ARCH 1, 1996 AGE 5 start." • Beth F. Ross (Stone Lakes Resident), 1308 Lakeway Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We lived in Tampa and are very familiar with Hyde Park. It's a first rate shopping experience! This should follow suit." • Dr. and Mrs. Thomas Tennery (The Dominion Resident), 401 Lafayette Park, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "It's a perfect opportunity for Southlake to set an example of quality and forward thinking in developing at high-end speciality retail shopping area that matches the need of the residents so dollars are spent here or not in adjacent cities that are doing their best to attract our attention with their amenities and shopping areas. • Cathlynn and David Simonak (The Dominion Resident), 407 Lafayette Park, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We support the proposed Southlake Commons development." • David and Frann Brown (Mission Estates Resident), 1025 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "This is the type of development we want in Southlake." III • Fred and Mary Lou Vincent (Mission Hill Estates Resident), 1019 Alamo, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor,"Sounds Good! We could use some upscale department stores and shops in Southlake." • Ann M. Farkes (Mission Estates Resident), 1019 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor,"Southlake must put a high priority on quality development. This will set a standard for future development." P &Z ACTION: January 18, 1996; Approved to Table (6-0) to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 8, 1996. February 8, 1996;Approved(5-2) subject to Plan Review Summary No. . 2 dated February 2, 1996; amended as follows: 1) allowing the driveway throat depths on S. Carroll Ave. as shown, forgiving approximately 10'in item#1 (150' driveway entrance throat depth requirement); 2) working with Staff to reach a mutual agreement on the last part of item #1 (the driveway entrance adjacent the northeast corner of the site has a throat depth of approximately 65') and all of item #2 (common access easement encompassing the northeast driveway entrance,travel lane,and"stub"to the adjoining property to the east); 3) noting the wall in the bufferyard to be 8' in height; • 4) extending the southern bufferyard to 25' in width; 5) including in the southern bufferyard the following plantings: 65 canopy trees of 3.5" caliper, 80 accent trees of 12' to 14' height, shrubs will be designated as stated in the ordinance requirement, and 7A-5 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK 0 RD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING ARCH 1, 1996 AGE 6 a strong recommendation that evergreen trees be considered; 6) schedule as presented for the interior landscaping on the south; 7) hours of operations are as follows: retail till 9:30 p.m.; restaurants, movie theaters, and bookstores with coffee shops till 12:30 a.m.; delivery between 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; 8) no outside P.A. (public address) systems; 9) additional restricted uses are as follows: no gas stations, no taverns, no gyms,no nurseries, allow dry cleaning plants but limited to 2,500 s.f., allow printing shops but limited to 2,000 s.f., allow grocery stores but limited to 12,000 s.f. COUNCIL ACTION: February 20, 1996;Approved(6-0)First Reading of Ordinance No.480- 190, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) with the understanding that the developer will relocate the movie theater to the northern portion of the site if possible. 40TAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated March 1, 1996. Although not required by this review process,the applicant has provided a conceptual landscape exhibit for the southern property line adjacent tb Oak Tree Estates and a conceptual site lighting exhibit. Attached is a memorandum dated February 27, 1996 from Valcoustics, a noise consultant. This information was requested by Councilmember, Pamela Muller. A super-majority vote of the Council will be required for approval of this item due to the opposition(within 200') exceeding 20% of the total land area. KPG/ls G:\W PFIMEMO\95CASES\95-127ZC.WPD • 7A-6 !. ' Joseph Bogdan Architects Associates Inc. Urban Design Consultants S 306 Sherbourne Street Toronto, Ontario M5A 2S1 Telephone 416/961-3416 Fax 416/961-7905 January 24, 1996 Mr. Gregory D. Last Community Development Director City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Southlake Commons Retail Centre Rezoning Application Case No. ZA95-127 Dear Sir, . Further to Mr. David Gibson's and my presentation to the P&Z Meeting on January 18, 1996, we enclose the required number of resubmission plans for, the February 8, 1996 . P&Z Meeting agenda. • is resubmission responds to issues raised by the Commissioners, and includes the • ollowing additional information: .1. . A partial landscape concept for the south parking lot to indicate the type, density and size of trees to be included on the final landscape plan. While we have retained our original 15 foot buffer in lieu of the 10 foot buffer required, we have increased the size of the trees to a 2 1/2" to 3" minimum from the 1 1/2" minimum required. .We have also increased the height of the masonry wall from 6 feet to 8 feet. 2. • We have retained an electrical engineering consultant to advise on appropriate lighting standards. Our partial plan indicates the proposed location, height . and maximum light spillage from these standards, to.record•that there will not be light spillage onto the residential lands. . 3. We include an overall site section to the correct elevation of the houses to the south, from grading information received from the City of Southlake. The purpose of this site section is to show that the proposed mansard roof profile of Southlake Commons will adequately screen the view of roof top equipment even from the second floor of these houses. Principals Associate 0 T. Joseph A.Bogdan Elie Newman ��"�'r �� j ?i' ti M.Arch.UO B.Arch.OAA OAA MRAIC Angelo Caranci n, +t B.Tech.(Arch.Sc.) r ,ry;.; %1 5 I )J I Robert W. Marley U B.Arch.OAA MRAIC y --� '''`� Arthur J. Timleck I 4 7A-7 1 Joseph Bogdan Architects Associates Inc. Urban Design Consultants sage 2 4. We have expanded the list of exclusionary uses from our application, and these are noted on our plan. 5. We have noted on our plan that the entrance lobby to the proposed cinema will be from the street leading to the Commons (facing north). We trust that this additional information and cooperation will assist the Commissioners to render a favourable decision on our application. Should you require any clarification please do not hesitate to call. Yours very truly, Josep Bogdan Associates Inc. • ph A. ogda OAA, ,FRAIL cc Mr. David Gibson - First Gulf Group Mr. Dave B. Marshall - J.D. Murchison Interests, Inc. Mr. Jeff Avery - Avery - Edwards Custom Homes: S 7A-8 •'Canada Ltd. Sauna'solutions ro acoustical clsal/engcs III30 Wertheim Court,Unit 25 Richmond Hill.Ontario anuary 24, 1996 Canada t48 1B0 h Bogdan Associates Inc. Tcicphonc•905 764-5223 Joseph g Fax•905 764-6613 306 Sherbourne Street Toronto, Ontario M5A 2S1 Attention: Mr. Angelo Caranci VIA FAX Re: Southlake Commons Your Project No.: 9552 Our File No.: 96-009 1.0 INTRODUCTION • ' The proposed commercial development will share a common property line with a new residential subdivision of single family homes. The commercial buildings will be set back • about 175 .to 225 feet, with the intervening space used as a parking lot. A landscaped buffer . strip will be along the common boundary to the residences,.to buffer.the-residential lots, which back on to the common boundary. 00 SOUND BARRIER . • As requested, we have •examined the effectiveness:of a sound battier proposed for the buffer strip, along the south property line. • To be effective acoustically a sound barrier must have these characteristics: • • Be of solid construction, with no cracks.or gaps. • Have a surface weight of at least 2 lb/ft2, preferably 4 lb/ft2. • Be of sufficient height to interrupt the line of sight from.the sound source.to. the . receptor. The more above this line the sound barrier extends, the more sound reduction • it will provide. Thus, the effectiveness of a sound barrier is related to the geometry of the situation; e.g. the location, the height, the elevations of source(s) and receptor(s). The analysis is based on: • The distances, topography, and geometry for the cross-section of residential lot 10, fronting on Westmont Drive. This is a representative and typical lot. • Motor vehicle sound sources located either close to the commercial building, or adjacent to the buffer strip along the south property line. This covers the range of effectiveness i -1rn D n i 1 JAN 2 5 J5 .. '� ; 1 i. _i 7A-9 CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERS • of the sound barrier for the parking lot between the commercial buildings and the residential development. • Receptors at second storey windows on the rear facade of the house and at standing height at grade, in the rear yard, 10 feet from the house (e.g. at a patio). • Accounting for sound reflections from. the southern facades of the commercial buildings. 3.0 ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the analysis results. -The total sound•reduction is a function of both the distance between source and receptor, and the sound barrier screening effect. As the source moves away from the barrier, the barrier effect is reduced. ' However, the sound reduction due to distance increases'at about the same rate. Thus, the net effect is essentially the•same-overall reduction, regardless of distance. Table. 1 shows that the sound reduction is about 10 to 13 dB'for a barrier height of 8 fat. A lesser height.,is not recommended because -of insufficient screening effect, particularly for second storey windows. A reduction of 10 dB is considered significant as it results in a •uetion of perceived loudness to one-half. • 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, , • • • ' ' • A sound barrier height of 8 feet would result in significant sound reduction of activity.in the parking lot, for the adjacent residential development, and is.recommended. A-brick and stone . wall as proposed would be quite satisfactory, as the minimum density requirement-would- be significantly exceeded. . If there are any questions we would be pleased-to respond. Yours truly, VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. Per: --- A.D. Lightsto , Ph.D., P.Eng. ADLUid SouthLke.Co=Leturs\W:'3 I.1113 Letters 10 Encl. • 7A 10 • TABLE 1 SOUTHLAKE COMMON SOUND BARRIER ANALYSIS :. .. ..v.,..:...G...S...:.G..•}G•. •v w .....:......:.:.: . .:. :... ..,..:. +r}...}i Gt:i +.l.:.. }: .> ::v'v....i.:.v;•-;Iw v.w .. J ::C)v i 4��.`y.Y n•Y)iv ito>. OSrr3 o S tiv}'v.SS4 •J1:v: vGW•: r..} A✓' � it'LLt • AYMF M` v 3\Gt i!}w •l: Near barrier • 6 10 7 8 1'3' 10 • • Near Commercial 6 3 (12) 0 (9) Building 8 4 (13) 1• (10) " • Source close to either barrier or building wall, as indicated. '+ . Numbers in parentheses include the effect of additional distance to the source from the residential property lint, for source position close to the commercial building. • • • 7A-11 FROM :JACOBSON'S TO B17 4B8 S074 1996.02-08 02:42Pt1 #988 P.81J01 JACOBSON STORES INC. EXECI.tTWYC OFFICL`S III 3333 13AHLIENT ROAD SAC% O}y,k11C1N(lAN 4D201 • MARK K.n05ENEELO cN�InMAM TELEt'JI!)t'IF:(511)7C4-64Aft FAX: 0171 764.7D8s AND crq EF EXEOIITlVl oFFICIIR February 8, 1996 l Mayor Gary Fickes City of Sauthlake 667 North Carroll Ave, Southiake, TX 76092 Dear Mayor Fickes: I am writing thif3 letter to clarify any misunderstanding or speculation with regards to Jacobson's relationship with David Gibson and First Gulf Group Developments Ltd. • We have been associated with David Gibson and companies that he has been involved with for over twenty years. During this time, we have developed several specialty centers together and are pleased to report that our stores have • prospered' in these locations. As I am sure you can appreciate. the successful development of fashion specialty centers takes a developer who is well financed, has an "' 1111 association with, national and regional specialty store retail chains, and a proven track record., For these • reasons, we have selected -the First Gulf Group to assist us in the expansion of Jacobean's Stores in selected Texas markets and other areas of the country. several brokers and other land owners have contacted us regarding our intentions regarding Fort worth. Simply put, we will be- continuing our alliance with Mr. Gibson and his • firm and hopefully we can look forward to building one of our fine Jacobson's stores in your community in the near • future. Sincerely, JACOBSON STORES INC.t Mark X. Rosenfeld Min/pkd Past-ir`Fax Nato 7871 0 0- $ 1 - 1 Hrt° •oE $E.4 7•1 l.i C.o. —TC, 4-vFtrQei 'r F E B 0 81996 , molls a 1'''°t1e" t� LFAwl,t,77,-ys.v-5p 7 Fncr s 1 7 7(p�f' ? S�6 3 7A-12 UL-14-yo up:iuriwi rrwa uuurlx tx uu, to 1ti1 t41ib5Uyt t`UULIUUj 0 ases,mp .........— .....",...00—„„,....., ....... i MEMORANDUM • ' DATE: February 14, 1996 TO: City Council of Southlake,Texas FROM: Southlalce Town Centre Venture(comprising aplxrcx:n ately 130 acres bounded by Hwy 114,FM 1709 and Carroll Avenue) RE: Proposed.Rezone for Southlake Commons("First Gulf Sitc") located on the southeast corner of South Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard(FM 1709) We have closely reviewed the proposed,site plan and. its intended uses which have necessitated, that a request for an upgrade in zoning be made. We would strongly urge the City Council to reject the application for the reasons set forth below. Our comments have been largely influenced by both the City's existing Zoning Ordinance(No. 480)as well as its Corridor Overlay Study. To date,the City of Southlake has been proactive in 0 endeavoring to provide increasingly clearer guidelines to the ongoing commercial development occurring within the city limits. The Soulblake Corridor Study adopted in August, 1995 identifies the major transportation corridors within the-City and'establishes specific land use goals, objectives and recommendations consistent with the character of each. In that Study,the intent for C-2 zoning along the FM 1709 Corridor is clearly stated"as the location for a majority of the Lead services in the community." It should also be noted that, per the existing zoning code, the C-2 designation also mirrors this land use intent and is specifically stated as a"district having a low to medium intensity commercial category providing a uniform set of standards for adghborhood type retail shopping facilities and general commercial activities. It(the district)is intended to provide limited kielit retail and service commercial uses which serve one or more neighborhoods y g within a nne"a one- f to two mile radius of the site". Limits as to maximum floor areas contained in any one structure, as well as Specific uses allowed; also .. definitively support this land use intent. The proposed major department store of 70,000 square • feet, combined with a movie theatre,will draw from at least a 5-10 mile, if not greater, radius. Clearly,this is not representative of the existing C-2 zoning designation,nor,in our opinion,is it compatible with the abutting residential homesites. The Corridor Study also goes on to identify very specific planning objectives for the Village Center East and West designated properties,namely,that"it is intended that a mixed-use Village Center be envisioned between SIT 114 and I?Ivi 1709 east of Carroll that will provide a focus for the community. It may include retail and office uses as well as cultural, civic, and recreational uses." Again,the existing zoning(C-3 in this case)supports the land use intent for the district by 0 F7--',",r7 7.1---:-.-:i--; �' i' FEB 1 5199 s 7A-13 LI i ' UG-14`yo u.3urlv1 rnum uuurrA k uu, 1u 1b114tl00UUI rUUi UUi • designating "general commercial zoning normally reserved for areas that provide the greatest number and mix of retail and commercial uses." Based on the above facts, it is our opinion that the requested rezone for the First Gulf site is inconsistent with what has been represented, and subsequently adopted, by the City as to its global urban planning goals and objectives. Further; if such an upgrade in zoning is granted on this site,it will seriously dilute the vitality envisioned fur the City's Village Center properties by taking key C-3 uses from where the City originally intended for them to be centrally located and repositioning them to a site where it would seem they were never epooifically contemplated. • • . • t, • 7A-14 IF..02/27/96 TUE 17:20 FAX 905 764 6813 VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD lQ 002 V A,Lzig• • Canada Ltd Sounds.hgioRi ro acarwtiosl rAa!leRPrs MEMORANDUM TO: Joe Bentley VIA FAX FROM: John Emeljanow DATE: February 27, 1996012na n RE: Sound Barrier Analysis FEB 2 71996 South Lake Commons L. V L i FELE: 96-009 • • INTRODUCTION S We have completed an analysis to determine the sound exposures that could occur at adjacent residential receptors. The situation is fairly complicated since there are varying numbers of cars, the locations of the cars is always changing and the relationship to the receptors is different. We have made some assumptions that we believe represent a typical worst case scenario. However,you may have additional information that we would be happy to incorporate into the noise analysis. We have approached the analysis on a one hour basis. L is the average equivalent sound exposure that occurs over an entire hour. The instantaneous sound level at the receptors will be constantly varying. Thus,it is difficult to work with the sound leveL Lin often presents a more meaningful result as it applies to a longer time frame. It must be noted that the instantaneous sound levels may exceed the one hour L . However,.clue to the nature of the sound source in this case and the energy average, the I,,,q is expected to be higher than the sound levels occurring for most of the time. NOISE SOURCES The main noise sources of concern associated with the parking area activities are: • cars manoeuvring in the parking area; • cars starting; and S CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL ENcINEeRs 7A-15 — �.._.._ ..�_ tei UUJ •itW 12' Canada.Ltd • Sarandsefitiwrve.Elecunticatarillertgar • • car door slams. We have assumed that in the worst case hour,there would be 500 car movements,car starts and car door slams. This is based on the parking area being filled or emptied in.an entire one hour period. Our experience with large retail areas in the past is that the average length of stay is greater than one hour. Thus, cars would generally not come and go in the same hour. RESULTS Accounting for a property line sound barrier,the sound exposures will not be the greatest at the common property line. This is because the sound barrier is most effective at this location. As you move away from the common property line, the sound barrier effect initially diminishes more rapidly than the increase in distance compensates. Thus, a good representative location of the worst case is the rear patios used by Dr. Lightstone in his previous analyses and the 2nd floor bedroom window location. Not accounting for the sound attenuation provided by the barrier, sound exposures of 60 dBA and 59 dBA would occur at the patio and 2nd floor bedroom window, using the scenario outlined above. As outlined by Dr.Lightstone previously,the sound barrier would • provide about 8 to 13 dBA of sound attenuation. Thus, accounting for the sound barrier, sound exposures of about 51 dBA could occur at the second floor bedroom window. This is about 2 dB above the sound exposure criteria of 49 dBA applicable between 7 pm and. 7 am. . The results outlined above are based on au assumed worst case scenario. Before proceeding further, these worst case assumptions should be verified to ensure that they represent a reasonable situation. If desired,we could then assist with developing additional mitigation features. If there are any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Jewrst-o\stia.akAsowymip . 2 • CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERS 7A-16 AVERY ,. .._ EDWARDS CUSTOM HOMES JEFF AVERY 17814 Davenport Road,Suit 115 S Dallas,Texas 75252 817-481-8971 • Fax 817-481-1139 = S Pager 214-813-6998 T J.D.MURCHISON INTERESTS,INC. Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Commissioners, Please allow me to express my opposition to the application for re-zoning Reference No.: ZA95-127. As builder/developer of Oaktree Estates, my objective is for the preservation of the property values of the homes built within this community, and the continued marketability of the lots within Oaktree Estates. I have met with the David Gibson of First Gulf to discuss my concerns. Unfortunately, I have not found any reason to support the re-zoning of the subject property. The intensity of this development with its increased traffic, noise, and lighting is wrong fo this location We purchased the property for Oaktree Estates knowing full well that commercial erty zoned for "Neighborhood Retail" was along our northern,boundary. We accepted that fact and have planned our development accordingly. Approval ofthis zoning change will put an undue burden on our property. The permitted uses allowed under C-3 zoning are totally inappropriate for this location. Specifically the movie theater, taverns and clubs allowed under C- 3 are detremental to our project. These establishments encourage activity well after the normal closing hours associated with a neighborhood center, and would negatively iompact any residential property in direct proximity. The increased traffic in this location due to the higher intensity of a C-3 development would also adversely impact the area. I do feel that the retail center proposed by First Gulf would be an asset to our city. However, this is the wrong location. There are significant amounts of C-3 property within • Southlake available for this type of commercial development. I encourage you remain true to the existing land use plans, the current zoning maps and ordinances. Please do not approve the development of a C-3 property to be placed contiguous to or in direct proximity to this residential neighbor-hood. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, liti4,4Ve:A--t: • ff ery Vice-President I17814 Davenport Road E E3 r 19 , Suite 115 Dallas,Texas 75252 ,. ; _.. .F`: L; 214-407 1024 7A-17 --�:_��_ : ! �i J f- :i 214-407-0318 Fax c LI>.MURCHISON NH:lasts.INC •EB. 023E 3: 57 214 7tS 9996 SANDERS&HSSOC. 004 P01 ZeCtitingtait)HOMES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLANING AND ZONING COMMISSION 667 NORTH CARROLL AVE. SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS 76092 FEBRUARY 2,1996 DEAR COMMISSIONERS, IN REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSED APPLICATION FOR REZONING REFERENCE • NUMBER ZA9S--127,WE,AS A BUILDER IN THE OAKTREE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ARE ADAMANTLY OPPOSED.THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER C-3 ZONING ARE TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS •SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE. OUR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT IN OAKTREE ESTATES WAS.BASED ON THE CURRENT LAND USE PLANS. IF THIS CHANGE IS APPROVED, IT WILL DRAMATICALLY IMPACT THE VALUE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND ITS MARKETABILITY. OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE THAN THIS PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD. I PLEAD WITH YOU TO PLEASE DISAPPROVE THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE AND MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. SINCER Y, K I GAN VICE-PRESIDEN riprPOIPST FEB 0 21996 w • 16610 Della% PWrkway • Sulk 2300 • Dallas_ Tcxax 757AR . (214)7134494 • Fax (214)113.M6 7A-18 • CUSTOM .uUI1DER5 • ASKU CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLANING AND ZONING COMMISSION 667 NORTH CARROLL AVE. SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS 76092 FEBRUARY 2,1996 • DEAR COMMISSIONS, IN REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSED APPLICATION FOR REZONING REFERENCE NUMBER ZA95-127, WE,AS A BUILDER IN THE OAKTREE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ARE ADAMANTLY OPPOSED.THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER C-3 ZONING ARE TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE. • OUR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT IN OAKTREE ESTATES WAS BASED QN THE CURRENT LAND USE PLANS:IF THIS CHANGE'IS APPROVED,IT WILL.DRAMATICALLY IMPACT.THE VALUE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND irs MARKETABILITY. OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE. THAN THIS PARTICULAR.NEIGHBORHOOD;I PLEAD WITH YOU,TO PLEASE DISAPPROVE THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE AND MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. SING Y, KEVIN EGAN - VICE-PRESIDEN 1irri:j5--.)'.17.:.13.01.-1 fflFEBO2lj • • 16610 Dpflas Parkway•Suite 2300•Dallas TX/5248.214/713-8494•Fax 214/713-99 6 7A-19 . 02-08-96 U3:UIY1J1 PROM ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT TO 94885097 P002/002 r • 71SSEIN"-SMOCK JOINT VENTURE 4222 Hallmark Dallas, Texas.75220 (214) 351-0461 February 8, 1996 Mr. Greg Last Director, Community Development City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 . VIA FAX-.(817)488-5097 Re: . Zoning Case No. 95-127- Southlake Commons Dear Mr.Last: S This letter is issued at the request ofliusseini-Smock Joint Venture as evidence of support for the Southlakc.Conintons.retail development currently being reviewed by the Planning and,Zoning Commission,of the City of Southlake. We believe that the development will enhance the retail opportunities within Southlake and improve the overall retail image of the region. Hussein-Smock Joint Venture, which owns the property directly to the east of the development, feels strongly that this type ot'development would,only improve the value of • the properties within the Southlake city limits. We commend the City of Southlake on its diligence in protecting the zoning issues of the property owners; however, we believe that this change in zoning request will benefit all parties concerned. We give this project our support. it .- 7( ,, ,./ . lir$4, , • ni 0 ock Joint Venture . cc: Curtis Hawk,City Manager-via fax(817)48 -6796 cuiU;hs•10203 11) . 7 7nn n l'ED 0 b I�S5 1111 7A-20 . W --.+J C� IIIMr. &Mrs. E. J.Bozarth 1300 Kings Brook Ct Southlake, Tx 76092 January 21, 1996 City Of Southlake 'Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 95-127 To whom it may concern: We are writing this letter,to express our concern,regarding a requested zoning change for the property described as being 29.516 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 259, Tract 7A. It is locate on the southeast corner of South Carroll Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). The requested change is to"S-P-2",Generalized Site • Plan District with C-3 uses. We are strongly opposed to this change. We moved to the Oak Tree Estates division in September of 1995. This division shares iiothe southern border of the aforementioned property. A primary consideration in our • decision to relocate to Southlake from Grapevine was the historical precedence of a rural atmosphere and the existing zoning. Changing that zoning at this'time would be a serious disservice to the commtmity at large and our division specifically. We vigorously object to the inclusion of a theater and the potential for establishments that permit the on-premise consumption of alcohol. It is ourr understanding that the property bounded by Highway 114,F.M. 1709, Carroll and Kimball is already zoned for such development and there is no need to modify the current zoning to make those establishments available to the • community. We fervently request that any efforts to modify the existing zoning of this property not be _ approved. There are many of us who moved to Southlake to escape the invasive • atmosphere of such developments and prefer to visit them at our desire and not be forced to live in their midst. Your thoughtful consideration of this matter is sincerely appreciated. (pt. c- ,,,,.. L t -e)Df kii ------____ Errett and Shelly Bozarthi liJAN 2 3 1996 j LVL1 V 7A-21 January 22, 1996 PARAGON Commissioners of the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Department 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Attn: Chris Carpenter • Dear Mr. Carpenter: I am a purchaser under contract for a new Avery-Edwards home in the Oaktree Estates. • I am a 23 year veteran of Dallas commercial real estate with firms such as Vantage, Cadillac, Fairview/Prentiss Properties, and currently Paragon Group. I have lived in North • Dallas owning several homes near the Preston Road/North Dallas Tollway area since the early 1980's. My.wife to be flies for American Airlines and I have a 4 year'old son and a 10 year old daughter. Through my professional tenure in Dallas real estate,I have never opposed another development firm and am in fact pro development myself Regarding the subject of a property rezoning request, I believe the line of cooperation between the city and a creditable development company should be drawn and held when it directly impacts adjacent residential areas. In this case, where no"buffer" zoning exists between high-end housing and the proposed "heavy retail", there seems no doubt that the proposed zoning change would create late night traffic and bring clientele not living in the immediate neighborhoods(i.e. movies, bars, restaurants, etc.). To endorse such a proposal would severely damage the entrusted faith put in the commission to plan the city's development without creating undesirable and conflicting uses in the process. As a homeowner, moving away from North Dallas with all its density and traffic issues to South Lake to benefit from its schools and suburban family atmosphere, I trust you will protect this highly desirable environment. As a developer and real estate supporter, I believe the proper zoning already exists for these proposed uses, possibly at a higher cost per square foot, but not in a location in which 7 day a week midnight traffic and clientele would be considered a nuisance to the family neighborhood concept. Fi_71:-T)1717 71 • • 7A-23 j J A N 2 5 IJJO Paragon Group 7557 Rambler Road Suite 1200 Dallas,Texas r uco 1-+'u, 214 891-2000 E • Wallas. St.Louis Charlotte Tampa ' Houston Los Angeles � �(-._' 4 :- • Commissioners of the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Department Attn: Chris Carpenter-Page 2 I believe consistency in your zoning will ultimately create higher value in your commercial property and build confidence with your investor groups. South Lake is desirable b cause i/t is attractive housing with a country(open) atmosphere. Residents expect to support retail, but not a North Dallas atmosphere where commerce is king and no one knows their neighbor. • Respectfully, „)71qc C / Michael E. Toon Vice President, Commercial Paragon Group Property Services, Inc. cc: Jeff Avery •• • • 7A-24 elDavid W. Watson 1308 Kings Brook Court Southlake, Texas 76092 January 29, 1996 The City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Dept. 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 REFERENCE#ZA 95--127 Dear Commissioners: I am writing to express my concern and disappointment that the city is even considering a proposal to change the zoning on the property located on the southeast corner of South Carroll and East Southlake Blvd. My family will be moving into our new house, in Oaktree Estates, on February 15. I, along with the developer and new neighbors, purchased our homes in Oaktree Estates,with the understanding that the above mentioned property was zoned C-2(neighborhood style retail shopping). • The proposed change to C-3 General Commercial District, is directly contrary to Section • 22.1 Purpose and Intent. As written in your ordinances: "It is not anticipated that this district will be placed contiguous to or in direct proximity to residential zoning districts?' Obviously, the property is directly contiguous to Oaktree.Estates homes. Section 22.1 further states: "It should be located in such a manner as to have reasonable access to major arterial roadway systems so that ingress and egress to the C-3 area may be managed in a safe and controlled manner." While the subject property is bordered on the north by F.M. 1709, the west borders on South Carroll Avenue. A C-3 zoned development will generate traffic volumes too large to be serviced by North Carroll. Why is the Zoning Department considering a change from C-2 to C-3? Only because an applicant wants to build a shopping center that the City ordinances directly prohibit. People are moving to Southlake with the inherent belief that the City planners are developing a planned family.community for the future. It is your responsibility to make sure that City development projects increase property values,not erode them. Sincerely, ZieeadaiaP-ad David Watson 1 1996 , JAN 0 : 1 • L. L.I Lot_. 7A-25 Craig&Linda Kay Smith • 1303 Forest Hills Court Southlake,Texas 76092 February 5, 1996 The City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Department 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 REFERENCE#ZA95-127 Dear Commissioners: • I am writing to express my concern and disappointment about the city considering a proposal to change the zoning on the property located on the southeast corner of South Carroll and East Southtake Blvd. We moved into our home in Oaktree Estates on October 20, 1995. We were told that the above mentioned property was zoned for neighborhood style retail shopping only. We are very concerned about what a change in the zoning will do to our property values. We also feel that the safety of our . neighborhood would be in jeopardy with a large shopping center backing up directly to our development. We decided to make our home in SouthtakP.because we felt this was a quiet,family community. We do not object to the city growing and adding shopping centers,but we do object to the city rezoning areas to place the larger shopping centers in direct contact with existing residential areas.. 41) We are confident that you will consider our plea for you to NOT consider this zoning change and make ' the right decision that will keep Southlake the great community it is today. • Sincerely, r q - , ./ eitc.diu 9( i/ Craig d Linda Kay Smith • 0r2unnn FEB 0 61996 III .......-3 _ 7A-27 7J 641/ _ ri G---�- FEB 0 996 Ui_1 :.iSri y'.. -5?-• at • 7,„„4—L.c -xLi2 7�-�� -�4-u/-•+tip (/ • arl._k_ JtAL-) • • 5 6 0 7A-28 i1 1 _1_. Li_i_iii__cAST miaiLAND SWEET 3_____14,5! 4_12n__. ..„Lrit4-ukklolsi,- raj 2A1 2 A 2 A El 1 ...A A IA .••- .___ c• 1E 18 I IC IA 2D § 2F .-•.1.7 ! fit. cAlV(I'll 6 1 101: .Maly' ) ! 2 , 10IA ! 102 ID2A 2.4.`• •••t-- N.,. 1 t 1 SA&SA2 II mu 10 s '24.91 Ac ‘*---/'; L . ,., _. 80.1 Ac I 1,' • -- i . -L. -I W.W. HALL I&IAI HALL ,.,! rrioN Zip'.1_._i•-• SA 14-687 Apr SLIMY A-622 • HOCH HD IA DS --,., -F' KY A-481 ! •. i IA '1>'/./, ,:."--' ) . I°. .' .• THOMAS-MAHAN! i ririo i i ! i l • .) -1121I 1 j - 1790 - - ---_1-. I • 1 A 3 2B1A 2C1 5 5CI -.'....P..--911.----- 1fr—\iS --•-------- • - i * ''' CITY ,.,/ 0 — y (,----- _.-- 7-r---,1C.-_.---1.--1914°- -1-4.4--L.--:: : eiriz----- •--1-.--r- DIVE (.\\--- A tii ati-' 54 „---•......„'...,..- I 1 1 --- , 20 IN !! `,.. ! •,,..-----1 ! 5A 1 -••••,________.......2_______sof?THIA/2 ‘ I- — i ii L.--. --.- • Iiiiiit ‘,/ i , ....." 25 Ac • ..--/ --I-1-H 22 Ac .......3 303A 303 . 3C 2Ar. , -__ ! ...;1 .. 3 Ac . ..m.manni ' 7.665 Ac 3•4 Ak 39 li. Eis.gil 3 9i •i`Iti ---- . 3D i ! E ._.- ,---- 3 A. IZAR I•1 t-1--1. ".... 3D2 1„,0 -r-ApprrIO _ Apf ! .--- p 1 31-1 382A 3D3AT 11 ' 313 I1709) ..-- 1 ',. .._ A . EiC3EAST SOU'lliLAXE BM. - - ------- - SDI • • 5C 3A 3A1 3C p 4C . • ; „.._ 2C 2 . 28 MA 182 ; . . • ! ! 12 .-- 1.-- oe 381 ; . • • . • 0g0 I -3 . 63213 . 15 Ac 5° /7. us 3 k f:Eil Ac 3.56 Ac i. a.“Ac 4.57 Ac C RON . - . 13 ...... Pt G51 k - Pt.Jti 01 15.v ) 2211 At •0° I 3r; \ 3D2 •• ----i N..' Cs, 2A3 2 -----3------ 3 401 4 .-.•••... . .9A• Us.s•:-'-',..-if.ta.„ - i i 1 ! . 1 I 1 II .‘ i p .....% . .., ri 7• ,.---- .:. ..! 1"- — -. `„• 1-4-11 III -IJr--)- 0••• i • ....---- ..... I . • ii ..-- , :ri 1• 11 ! , II / - _....--- --....... =•:--• .A.- \ • ,.,,,. . • ' 'T. 28 r, .--"%, , .2.... OREM pi'll 21 Ac-\(1..• 4E z. f -, _ -,-,d.1FI.1.4..1..11.V1.1.."_".•„s 1-,.;.;.,),.. 1--„1,..,.4.:'•,Ik-rIT-'--.-.s!...•.'1....0(i.i)•-[Iird,I -X _P' • r-.i.r..i.,-.-.--,N± ' iN IAI F i gry i.4.1A9 W i ; • iiiiiiiiiiY. \A , ' ---i--- --------- :x , 20Ac \\ ..• it 1 .: •. 1 ill . EitIsill ? ! E,t SUR1EY A-099 I • irr9 • rj(:-....2 - i i i i i i ! !-lis.‘ 1 • • .. • !' 17:::,'-)) 416V.I___Ac 1 1 - ow.mlitm.....!Iircitl)'-. •:::;* i i ‘r, ! \ r ......._,„. ., 2 .- A.1‘1,. • „v....0 4, k- .• . ,' ..,_...., 68- r .,r, 1--fi---1-.... ,._ r, ._ „...5.IsN'...-: • ' i 1 !.' i ii 1A3 --- 20 Ac 19..to•,:''',..4r xl- Iro -','"r". \ 4c , . - 1.. vy - HALE-) [..) %,.. -:c4,f.- 7; •irir•Jr- ''•'•-- • • it,' Iny -...C. i .4..• - i i i • , —_,48 --2 4.1_ r— C f 6A1 ------ 1, -- RANBOW sr.1- './ -....r. '4 i • ; 4A •*,- i fifl i 1- -r•i i j- -T 'VI I !R- • i_i / I BAIA 8A1 2A 28 201 • i • • _. ,A2 - ! ill / . \I- -- . • ill 6.432C )Ac IGO"• 1 **T-Vrl: -• s. 6A • 91-t . . ,...1,!,......„,J,i_ ::: mtna.m.x..4 . / -u.. ..„. . . . - 1A2 IA -• 682 68 ;,...," 6C 6D NI .0U5IN 6E -c 11.111ea.:, TRACT MAP 4 A.,„_. . . .,.. r---", _ ...,‘ i I .".14,P1311114)." -,---i-r - :V•A'' 6E 1 t. 6F ! ! 7A-29 . 1 1 1 1...... — ' i , 202 I 1 I 1A1 eLvDc..) ' i i i i i i a u i i .. V.._ ; The Fechtal Group "C-3" ,JD ( F. V . C. Peterka "C-3" - - - - - - - - - -State of Texas R.O.W. - - — 01 4D 7A (-4-1 A. Prade 30. . Ac Air "AG" Q w 00 O Smock & Husseini JV Spin #8 Representative . "0-1 Patti Minder / i / \ 1 I -I I I I Murchison Properties Inc. I Murchison Sanders Custom Builders Ltd. - - "SF-20B" 1 Properties Inc. I I WESTv10NT F-F--- . Z._ • . ___ • ." I I — ADJA( T OWNERS I I I ,, AND ZONING • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-190 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 29.516 ACRES, SITUATED IN THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, TRACT 7A, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH CERTAIN "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FO 1 . PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND/ PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI; Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of - buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-2" Local Retail Commercial under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by G:\ORD\CASES\480-190.W PD Page 1 7A-3 1 7 .0 the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of • public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly ® requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is • a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City 411 of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:1ORD1CASE514 80-1 90.WPD Page 2 7A-32 ..� is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 29.516 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tract 7A, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "S- P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with certain "C-3" General Commercial District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, IImorals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall 4) be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a G:\ORD\CASES1480-190.WPD • Page 3 7A-33 . r 41, violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR • G:\ORD\CASES\480-I90.W PD Page 4 7A-34 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: • EFFECTIVE: • G:\ORD\CASES\480-190.W PD Page 5 7A-35 iy EXHIBIT "A" -410 BEING a tract of land situated in the John A . Freeman Survey, I Abstract No . 529 in the City of Southlake , Tarrant County, Texas send being part of a tract of land as conveyed to W. E. Dalton and Dorothy .L. Dalton and recorded in Volume 6992 , Page 719 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as, fol lows : BEGINNING at a K" iron rod set for corner at the intersection of the east line of South Carroll Avenue (a variable width right- of- way) with the south line of East southlake Boulevard (a 130 foot right-of-way) ; THENCE S. 88 ' 39 ' 12" E. , 1342 .62 feet along the said south line of East Southlake Boulevard to a K" iron rod set for corner, said . point being the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 1 of the GorbutL Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 388-156 , Page 12 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S . 00' 13 ' 18" W. , 959 .70 feet leaving the said south Line of East Southlake Boulevard, and along the west line of said Garbutt Addition to a 3/4K iron rod found for cornet, said point being on the north line of Oak Tree Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Plat Cabinet "AK , Slide 2121-2122 the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; • IlliTHENCE N. 88'36' 1 3 " W. , 1316.93 feet. along the said north line Oak Tree Eatetes to .4 34" iron rod found for corner on the said east line of South Carroll Avenue - (a 70 foot wide , right-of-way at this point) ; THENCE N. 88 ' 36 ' 13" W. , 22 .00 feet to. a point for corner on thi said *atilt line of south Carroll• Avenue to a %" iron rod found for corner; . THENCE NORTH, 958 . 62 feet along the said east line of South _ Carroll Avenue to the Point of Beginning and containing 29 . 516 acres (1, 285, 702 square feet) of land . III G:\ORD\CASES\480-I90.W PD Page 6 • 7A-36 I - a•C•I 1 ..777... cmn mn aanr w sm 1.%«1vXl ` 070701 oua an-^'? 0 it w, 0 . n• • I.q .. ''''-.70.1: 1„7 • IAMM I. I. 01 y n lA4Oi[AKO effCR n n r , C�9 F - 0 YNCIKN XOAO SCAl01 PI1CPCIRT U E • r¢*vs �.-v i m >• + �1 C Os.Artim Mr •' nP¢•ar --y'�— -----------•• •.. ------ .. rri _-__—_^'--_— .— ._--------- MFFOQA IMOXIM w."K°."�"w...¢a�' G-Y °'J .00 v - A , .K.¢O.aA Opp 4ll 4 , 4 N1, 4 1na. swuma ,n� rir �tAIs i'8 F .IYcuWAY NQI709 [15115 ROMP u[10 mt.a M, .xo a j. L./0PM$.0. j PROMO rbC MAK M1DUfT uc j 1 A an 17( 17fin nf-p7 PAItK11D sit i yyt �.. � FEB 1996 y al3 SP S 5 1 1 ,`j PARK: , 2 9 11 tb all SPA S CURB- <AA �nal MOW.��Pa.Im i PPP' 2 a y P;tcus1 tAKIDWC A R :,..W.,.. r;- UAW D COM w m ..9 ��\/// A,p -....tr��, j. DEPARTMENT STORE _r! .Sim."{- { 41h4,74 ;� KEY PLAN w f::J ,111, S0000 S.F. �. . : - mmr ni.•m.cw4 5 a :Ar :I 4.voa Y -- "4' d :T SDI DATA SUMMARY `�" 'r..• tx-T i.w am.c , 1 M ;� H::+ ;N :_ .. sry.�.e.�. .'- .11 miirn.l•n..eoa M fg WADING l , RCTMNC E `• _ "':.f'[a.J'�'�. „�.,▪▪ I. . a.,a [n nmr..n¢t• Y'% ��REM. £5JIW 5 D `; RETM • r f g nnv¢n wears¢ �, F1••T�-11 { .••SF, RUM. 19100 S.F. �for Y Q oua.orxa NJwam "°""¢ Z R. ' - .'.r•^: 37800 F. < e p£ �i.ni$ �• rurn119.9�� SJh1EECCS 55• • • bautetto e 1 •i 19k3 ..arm x m.o. 'Imi �I1DlAtF.VAS -_ f' C '' wrA �� .t oeaAr9TUENr sraaE " <; ¢ t d :4 •�;C f��>� �wsC,.j3j.:-,a 70000 SF. oo.¢AM j��s10m•s•m a.m ' h r' r. .fi. 9,04,•-•.. r•e t ® aevs wa a r¢.lm mw.m x cw.a ne awe �' am c a ; .S ll 11A. �•7r. /tiA�'>'r nr Os.aa a¢.m.,m.mm1 uwll.o.r. W.E.DALTDN AND Z 1 [�` „lx r'. . �(�"^ oppomair cum law,OM trr a.,A DCROTNY H.DAETDN ' F ! I 5� P. �" .r ,O .+,. r Otiteo:ISM CM C.• 17 �.awal�aa POI m ami 9.A1E 7774 P.O.BOX KOROT512757 - IAAtD0t0 C ........•_.SACES 't • v'i w '�� ma v.m ON1/:S TE)CAT 75151-m7 } 1 aCCw SF. REIMBOONS N 7 e r5Cn.cINC D r k< :RETAXY.,, ..'..r,,e ;�.`jai NOTES4.• „ �n'cI ,wI a.m FIRST GULF GROUP DEVELOPMENTS LTD. .a. .J! I APPIp1vAII MEAT 6 ��. '� �• 19300 Sf. �' ,1Im role w Rwnm l®a yRy{4 .IV I DISTAL SZCC OrTA y y l0�1 WX CAIIOEII CRQE cRRVII �- nT -- NF �J�. rOC-a ry Ow man Wlno.ua10 r.mc ADZE1M L__ won •<w ua m c m m y595SN U 01TA�FANiDA wt_ - - , ! .--I ' rwou'w.o av av aevaucw u OR 3C6 nm.au.•ma.w•e..m vm • DIrCK j ® p ® I nes.+aawan...wean m.¢mam ma ro'D r4,TlO1i 2:•'.a w . . • I Y PAAKVIC �R�T •1 4_e'rim mom �• O••+n r...Iw1. m IRA,Itm1 Am)a P.¢Iv.¢ ,01 w•w. �ewr I. 5P S mt 14 w NAmm an . ' :n Av Ar a• Ml m )1 Mann a BIOS 10.4 AArs w.DMA r.......1•ne1:,.n1 cam�� • . n mI.CIA ein:•n awn i m.m 1701TEP1 RAN KR v-Y min- �'D\'';::�•y�\`:�: `----•.•.:::•....••.t,;:•:i•:r�;;i•;:::.., •Ilig• y� ,1 eurt.n omm SW OLA<ttM 9 79.516 At w l\\+.'+..\1iV1:,t7:M.+-ir:C>`:ii,'<U� "::ti i:;�4.7.:47..\\�:..:+`:til\tom'+ :::•�\.♦\+ ',- .•:•74.+••n::� •`..:� •n GtRR \ ♦ \++ \ \'\ ♦� ♦ \+ \i.. ♦• `?,' ''" Im w.0 MR AM A FRLYAtl SUMT ASST.�379 ....,i�.iw.♦+::::?c\\\\.Lti:v+:.t+.4':'v+.70..............94......i �\ @a.•♦'9000k:\\♦•.' .000 ;'." :S:0:0=\♦\y`0a,00, �` ;::40.;++....SKIKti r A..H amm warm va.,r AAmu,. MO/ •n'+.+.+.•\t:\+aaR:.ttn ;:.:` ,.•:,tiC:. .4:v ....':?-. s^.�::.\`.:::<:•::::^..+ Irt.tux MA I.n 1.1.m CAST N0.7A 95-117 onn.c ...., 00,0 wOaRO WPM .m/Se CO e A n• -— m+m1 PROcfAtt tM •,-h lM moo ri'AMMO C•O' . PC(PO au M.1 0 001n•n WW1 C.011•C aALL n 0a.n atrm 1 7 3 a 7 A 8 10 11 12 13 stc. M. " x..,o.m. 0.a..mem 0.01•r,.m. 09.uleoe ya eaaA s nn tuna mrA,Ian tam. wre swat ena ma slam Ana Ara won ona wu mMa a IAA AWL 1 MA•i A DAM MAI r�' rW.. 1OVAIPC .NP.•C ROAM It WA Int MO LA MlO ILL &A•1m A.OA In MAMA Pe I # ,# VS PIA, ....900 m 0P9h u• a• Ai ON Wnh um W 9r lb. h 6' h e9 V. `' wnh M.P.M ALLR•n An.. M.¢n P.a,Ara P.t.'0 u PM TA�A A.¢Er' A.¢fm et RWrw AfaM lO.R a,a 4 �9wln( ]J1 00[¢•n Gm. gm.a1m Pm NM i0.w 9.0 A.ire ma i • r, aI Ac m oAx TREE ESTATESI •.IA•r<�: "r d. I 9552-D-CO1 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-190, Second Reading ZA 95-127,Rezoning and Concept Plan/Southlake Commons REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Southlake Commons, being approximately a 29.516 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529, Tract 7A LOCATION: Southeast corner of S. Carroll Ave. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNERS: W.E. and Dorothy H. Dalton APPLICANT: First Gulf Group Development, Ltd. CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial and Office Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: Three (3) written responses received within the 200' notification area: • JeffAvery(Avery Edwards Custom Homes), 17814 Davenport Road, Suite 115, Dallas, Texas 75252 and Dave B. Marshall (Murchison Properties, Inc.), 1445 Ross Ave., Suite 5300, Dallas, Texas 75202, is opposed, "As owners of the adjacent residential property to the south,we are concerned about the effect of lighting,the adequacy of the landscape buffer and the appearance of the masonry wall." (See letter received February 1, 1996.) • Kevin Egan, Huntington Homes(Sanders&Assoc. Custom Builders), • 16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 2300, Dallas, Texas 75248, a builder in Oak Tree Estates, is opposed to the rezoning for it will be inappropriate and impact the value of the neighborhood and it's marketability. (See letter received February 2, 1996.) • Jon C. Napper (Husseini - Smock Joint Venture), 4222 Hallmark, Dallas, Texas 75229, is in favor: 1) enhance the retail opportunities MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 within Southlake, 2) improve the overall retail image of the region, and 3) improve the value of the properties. (See letter received February 8, 1996.) Eighty-four (84) written responses received outside the 200' notification area: • Errett and Shelly Bozarth(Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1300 Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed to the rezoning change due to them relocating to Southlake for the "historical precedence of a rural atmosphere and the existing zoning". (See attached letter received January 23, 1996.) • Elizabeth Hartman (Timarron, Phase II, Village of Bent Creek Resident), 1365 Bent Creek Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, the proposal will provide "a positive image and needed services to Southlake residents". (See attached letter received January 23, 1996.) • J.A. Browne (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1308 Forest Hills Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed: too large, opens center up to too many operations,no longer a local type of center(bars, lodges,.. and clubs),there are already two movie theaters(multi-screen)within 2-3 miles of location,noise and traffic will have bad impact on area, and property values could suffer. "I purchased property in Southlake to get out of traffic." • Michael Toon, 4155 Briargrove, Dallas, Texas 75287(is purchasing a house in Oak Tree Estates,Phase I, at 1221 Forest Hills, Southlake, Texas 76092), is opposed, "Regarding the subject of a property rezoning request, I believe the line of cooperation between the city and a creditable development company should be drawn and held when it directly impacts adjacent residential areas." (See attached letter received January 25, 1996.) • Mary & Bill Tinsman (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1315 Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed, "We do not want additional 'night' activity." • David W. Watson, 1204 Hidden Ridge #3018, Irving, Texas 75038, apparently is intending to buy a residence in Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, at 1308 Kings Brook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed. (See attached letter received January 30, 1996.) • Loree and Dennis Green (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 404 Edgemont, Southlake, Texas 76092, is opposed, "This change will not only lower the value and appeal of all of our homes but the appeal of Southlake in general. What brought us to Southlake in the first place will now be destroyed. We are very opposed." • Craig and Linda Kay Smith (Oak Tree Estates, Phase I, Resident), 1303 Forest Hill Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, concerned and disappointed, "about the city considering a proposal to change the MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 3 zoning". (See letter received February 5, 1996.) • Dianne Neville (Oak Hill Estates Resident), 560 Truelove Trail, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor: 1) quality development, 2) fits beautifully with the future goals of keeping the inevitable growth of the business community in our town positive, and 3) one central area bringing our citizens together. (See letter received February 7, 1996.) • Kimberly S. Evans (Stones Lake, Phase I, Resident), 1402 Richmond Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor for it will provide the following: 1) quality shopping and restaurants, 2) a center to gather with friends and neighbors, 3) significant tax dollars,4)E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) from looking like an inconsistent, assorted collection of odd types of businesses, shops, eateries, strip center, etc., 5) great job opportunities to our teen age and college students, 6) window of opportunity to attract and acquire such a top notch retail/entertainment center. • Linda Hayes (Stone Lakes, Phase, I, Resident), 202 Manor Pl., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake desperately needs an upscale shopping center. I would rather see a project like that instead of more of the same strip center, offices, etc." • Mr. and Mrs. Kerry W. Brennan (The Dominion Resident), 811 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I(we)feel it could improve property values and character of this area -- much more positively than a strip center", "make Southlake a different and desirable place to live and shop," and "keep out tax dollars here". • Mr. and Mrs. Norman Christensen (The Dominion Resident), 809 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Commercial development in Southlake is inevitable and this proposal is the type of development we would like to see happen in Southlake." • J. M. Lewis.(The Dominion Resident), 801 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We would prefer to have a quality development instead of strip mall." • Laurie Goldfeder (Stone Lakes, Phase I, Resident), 210 Manor Pl., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I think a development of this nature will compliment the Southlake neighborhoods and bring more tax revenue to our City." • Jody Hanson (Stone Lakes, Resident), 1306 Lake Way, Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We need high-end retail in Southlake. Its classy design will blend with neighborhood." • • Carolyn Hill Morris (The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake needs a commercial development of the quality proposed with Southlake Commons. It will be an asset to our town." • Tom Morris(The Dominion Resident), 403 St. Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I would much rather see a development such MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 4 as Southlake Commons rather than the usual 'unsitely' (unsightly) strip mall." (Response received February 19, 1996.) and "an upscale shopping center such as the one proposed by Southlake Commons would be a real plus for our city". (See letter received February 5, 1996.) • David P. Rowland (Stone Lakes Resident), 1000 Normandy Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We believe that the shopping center will enhance the value of our property and also provide significant tax revenue to the City of Southlake." • Thomas V. Stephen (The Dominion Resident), 711 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Barry and Glenda Sorrels (The Dominion Resident), 405 Alexandria Circle, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake is in great need of shopping areas in the community so those dollars spent can help our City instead of Dallas and Fort Worth and an upscale shopping area would also enhance the look of the community. Please make this a reality!" • Gary D. Robertsen (The Dominion Resident), 614 Dominion Dr. Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor "will enhance property values and quality of life in Southlake area." • Victoria Binggeli (The Dominion Resident), 807 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "wonderful for tax base" and "The .property plans would enhance the charm and distinctiveness of Southlake." • Mary K. Canfield (The Dominion Resident), 703 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We need upscale commercial development in Southlake to set the trend for future upscale commercial development." • Sharon Carlen (The Dominion Resident), 705 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas . 76092, in favor, "I believe this would be a wonderful project for Southlake. We need a high-end speciality shopping center to compliment our town." • Stephen G. and Diane Krusey (The Dominion Resident), 701 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "See a need to broaden the City's commercial tax base. Also would like not to have to travel to Dallas North Park or the Galleria for high-end shopping stores." • Cynthia L. Brissman (Stone Lakes Resident), 1240 Lakeway Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "an upscale retail center with Jacobson's Department Store and others in a plaza setting". • Ann Bullock(The Dominion Resident), 403 Bayou Vista, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake needs a speciality center that is unique. No more strip centers! Southlake has high end residential areas and needs unique high-end specialty villages. This is a good MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 5 start." • Beth F. Ross (Stone Lakes Resident), 1308 Lakeway Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We lived in Tampa and are very familiar with Hyde Park. It's a first rate shopping experience! This should follow suit." • Dr. and Mrs. Thomas Tennery (The Dominion Resident), 401 Lafayette Park, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "It's a perfect opportunity for Southlake to set an example of quality and forward thinking in developing at high-end speciality retail shopping area that matches the need of the residents so dollars are spent here or not in adjacent cities that are doing their best to attract our attention with their amenities and shopping areas. • Cathlynn and David Simonak (The Dominion Resident), 407 Lafayette Park, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We support the proposed Southlake Commons development." • David and Frann Brown (Mission Estates Resident), 1025 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "This is the type of development we want in Southlake." • Fred and Mary Lou Vincent (Mission Hill Estates Resident), 1019 Alamo, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor,"Sounds Good! We could use some upscale department stores and shops in Southlake." • Ann M. Farkes (Mission Estates Resident), 1019 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor,"Southlake must put a high priority on quality development. This will set a standard for future development." • Kathleen Haitz (Huntwick Estates Resident), 705 Harty Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Jay and Julie Speelhoffer(Timber Lake Residents), 309 Timber Lake Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Mary Q. Ryniak (Timber Lakes Resident), 705 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Duane A. and Judy Bender (Timber Lake Residents), 302 Timber Lake Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Robert and Jane S. Kent(Timber Lake Phase 2 Residents), 705 Brook Meadows Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Ann K. Creighton (Timber Lakes Resident), 705 Lakehurst Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Troy and Lindsey Vinson (Timber Lakes Residents), 309 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Barbara YanHeyningen (Timber Lakes Resident), 405 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Lisa Swick (Timber Lakes Resident), 504 Glenbrook, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Yes, I am in favor for the proposed zoning for Southlake Commons." MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 6 • Ann Marie Brannan (Timber Lake Resident), 517 Timber Lake, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "In favor of Jacobsons!" • Ted and Katie Christensen (Timber Lake Residents), 504 Timber Lake Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Amy Nelson (Timber Lakes Resident), 606 Shadybook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "How wonderful! A perfect addition to Southlake." • Kenneth and Lucinda Kranz (Mission Estates Residents), 1017 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Linda S. Dudas (The Dominion Resident), 713 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Andy and Sherry Berman (Timber Lake, Phase 3 Residents), 818 Parkdale Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I hope that the council members understand that this is quality and this is what Southlake needs." • G. Irene Binyon (Timber Lake, Phase III, Resident), 805 Shorecrest Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Janet Scott (Timber Lake Resident), 202 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I am in favor of the project provided it will be truly a'specialty center' with upscale retailers and services. Great efforts should be taken to develop and landscape the project in an aesthetically appealing manner. No tacky signage!!! Highland Park Village would be a good model." • Vicki S. and Darrell W. Harwood(Timber Lake, Phase III, Resident), 710 Shorecrest Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "it is projects like Southlake Commons that will make our city unique and unique is what will keep Southlake a very sought after and desirable place to live." • Stacey Enright (Timber Lake Resident), 702 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092 "I am in favor of the proposed zoning for Southlake Commons by First Gulf Group." • Bradley W. and Janelle E. Moore (Mission Estates Resident); 909 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I realize the property is zoned commercial "C-2". That's all Southlake needs is a strip center and another gas station. First Gulf Corporation is presenting a'unique' concept that enhances the area instead of'just another' eye sore." • Sandra L. Ridenour (Diamond Circle Estates Resident), 1030 Diamond Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "The drawings look great--1st class center. I am however, against the theater going into the center. I would be 100% for it without the theater." • Glen E. McBride (Mission Estates Resident), 908 Mission Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Laurie Starks (Timber Lake Resident), 307 Timber Lake Way, MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 7 Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "It would be wonderful to have quality shopping in Southlake as opposed to more low end shops such as Target and Wal-Mart. This will hopefully bring in some much needed tax revenues as well." • Judith L. Watts(Timber Lake, Phase III, Resident), 810 Parkdale Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We chose to live in Southlake because of its high standards in education and the development of the city. I think this proposed development is in keeping with these high standards." • Marilyn and Dan Nesper (Timber Lake Resident), 804 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "This is the type of development we would like to see on 1709." • Lisa Cook(Timber Lake Resident), 802 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I am from Michigan, so I am very familiar with Jacobeson's. It would be a great addition to Southlake. I currently live in the Timber Lake neighborhood, and am very pleased with the development. I think First Gulf Group did a top notch job." • Suzanne B. Spinks (Chimney Hill Resident),1413 Northridge Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Tammy Stripling (Timber Lake Resident), 800 Shadow Glen, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Albert and Carol Rudnickas (Timber Lake Residents), 805 Parkdale Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Robin Yeager(Timber Lake Resident), 700 Shorecrest Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Leslie Bartlett(Cross Timber Hills Estates Resident), 1344 Ten Bar Trail, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Please build in tasteful architecture -not like Wal-Mart!!! • Pam McElhany (Timber Lake Resident), 702 Brook Meadows Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Please-no Tinseltown type movie theater- and restrict hours of operation." • Sherry Pichler (Timber Lake Resident), 805 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I strongly support an upscale retail center in Southlake, one that would resemble Highland Park. My only concern is making sure the movie theater complex is small in number of screens." • Kelly and Francis Jelensperger (Timber Lake Resident), 503 Timber Lake Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "please approve this zoning and bring in some upscale businesses and development to Southlake. We love it here, but we won't stand for any more Wal- Marts." • Ron and Elizabeth Johansson (Timber Lake Resident), 501 Timber Lake Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "We are strongly in favor of this development of an upscale fashion center - Southlake MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 8 Commons-and know it will be an enhancement to the community." • Susan H. McCormack (Timber Lake Resident), 210 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Southlake dollars stay in Southlake." • P. Howell (Southview Resident), 625 Southview Trail, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Pat Vallentiny (Oak Hill Estates Resident), 705 Oak Hill Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Harry Caldwell (Timber Lake, Phase III, Resident), 813 Parkdale Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Doug Strickland(Diamond Circle Estates Resident), 1027 Diamond Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "This is the type of commercial development we need to increase tax base and give our homeowners some relief with our school taxes." • Eva Chapman (Southlake Hills Resident), 1207 Meadow Ridge Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Joe Olian (Stone Lakes Resident), 1311 Stone Lakes Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Let's stress high quality-not quantity!" • Margaret B. Olian (Stone Lakes Resident), 1311 Stone Lakes Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Let's maintain the quality of life in Southlake with quality shopping centers, not tacky strip centers. Also, it would be great to have a place for local teens to go locally." • Jeanne M. Jacobowski (Timber Lake Resident), 107 Springbrook Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I am not only in favor but very excited about this-every aspect of it-the location,the convenience, the upscale look,the businesses coming in and the tax base and jobs in our community. Everyone I know is just as excited and looking forward to it." • Glenda Sorrels (The Dominion Resident), 405 Alexandria Circle, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor,Ms. Sorrels is disappointed that this project was not passed immediately at a recent City Council meeting. She states that the main obstacle is a developer owning adjacent land, who knew that the proposed site was zoned for commercial use when he bought his property. "I do not understand why anyone would reject an upscale shopping center in favor of the possibility of erecting an all-night gas station." (See attached letter dated February 29, 1996.) • Carolyn Hill Morris(The Dominion Resident), 403 Saint Charles Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, in a letter to the City Council Members, Ms. Morris states, "The Southlake City Council decision on March 5 will set the benchmark for future development in our city." She urges City Council, as representatives of Southlake residents, to "secure this quality development for the residents of Southlake." (See attached letter dated February 27, 1996.) MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 9 • Thomas Stephen(The Dominion Resident), 711 Dominion, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Kate Marshall (The Dominion Resident), 602 Dominion Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor "It will expand the tax base, keep some consumer spending here, rather than stores in other cities, provide added shopping convenience and improve aesthetics." • William and Macy Lou Hartman (Mission Hill Estates Resident), 513 San Jan Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • Kathy Banks (Timber Lake Resident), 503 Glenbrook, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. P &Z ACTION: January 18, 1996; Approved to Table (6-0) to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 8, 1996. February 8, 1996;Approved(5-2) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 2, 1996, amended as follows: 1) allowing the driveway throat depths on S. Carroll Ave. as shown, forgiving approximately 10'in item#1 (150'driveway entrance throat depth requirement); 2) working with Staff to reach a mutual agreement on the last part of item#1 (the driveway entrance adjacent the northeast corner of the site has a throat depth of approximately 65') and all of item #2 (common access easement encompassing the northeast driveway entrance,travel lane, and"stub" to the adjoining property to the east); 3) noting the wall in the bufferyard to be 8' in height; 4) extending the southern bufferyard to 25' in width; 5) including in the southern bufferyard the following plantings: 65 canopy trees of 3.5" caliper, 80 accent trees of 12' to 14' height, shrubs will be designated as stated in the ordinance requirement, and a strong recommendation that evergreen trees be considered; 6) schedule as presented for the interior landscaping on the south; 7) hours of operations are as follows: retail till 9:30 p.m.; restaurants, movie theaters, and bookstores with coffee shops till 12:30 a.m.; delivery between 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; 8) no outside P.A. (public address) systems; 9) additional restricted uses are as follows: no gas stations, no taverns, no gyms, no nurseries, allow dry cleaning plants but limited to 2,500 s.f., allow printing shops but limited to 2,000 s.f., allow grocery stores but limited to 12,000 s.f. COUNCIL ACTION: February 20, 1996;Approved(6-0)First Reading of Ordinance No.480- 190, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) with the understanding that the developer will relocate the movie MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORD. NO. 480-190, SECOND READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 10 theater to the northern portion of the site if possible. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated March 1, 1996. Although not required by this review process,the applicant has provided a conceptual landscape exhibit for the southern property line adjacent to Oak Tree Estates and a conceptual site lighting exhibit. Attached is a memorandum dated February 27, 1996 from Valcoustics, a noise consultant. This information was requested by Councilmember, Pamela Muller. A super-majority vote of the Council will be required for approval of this item due to the opposition(within 200') exceeding 20% of the total land area. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\95CASES\95-127ZC.WPD City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-191, First Reading ZA 95-116,Rezoning and Concept Plan/Commerce Square REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square,being approximately a 7.22 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A LOCATION: South of E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and immediately east of Crooked Lane OWNER: Steve and Sue Pritchett APPLICANT: Pima Properties, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District AMENDED REQUEST: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1," "I-1," and B-1" uses as follows: Building 'A': "B-1" and "0-1" uses Buildings 'B' and 'C': "B-1," "0-1," and the following "I-1" uses: wholesale baker, candle manufacturing, candy plant or production facility,carpet cleaning operations, clothing manufacturing,cold storage warehouse, commercial school and trade school, compounding of cosmetics&toiletries,electronic components manufacturing&assembly, glass blowing, insulation application business, irrigation sales & services, including pumps & equipment,janitorial or cleaning services, laboratory, chemical analysis, general analysis, physical testing, linen and towel, service, manufacturing of medical and dental equipment,pest control business, plumbing, heating, refrigeration or air conditioning shops, public utility facilities, pump sales and service, sign manufacturing, and warehouses. Buildings 'D1,"D2,' and 'D3': "I-1" uses as listed: wholesale baker, cabinet or carpentry shop, candle manufacturing, candy plant or production facility, carpet cleaning operations, clothing manufacturing, 8A-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK RDINANCE NO. 480-191, FIRST READING ARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 cold storage warehouse without size limitation, commercial school and trade school, compounding of cosmetics and toiletries, electronic components manufacturing and assembly, glass blowing, ice cream manufacturing, insulation application business, irrigation sales and service, including pumps and equipment,janitorial or cleaning services, laboratory chemical analysis, general analysis,physical testing, linen and towel service manufacturing of medical and dental equipment, mini- warehouses,pest control businesses,plumbing, hearing, refrigeration or air conditioning shop, public utility facilities, pump sales and service, sash and door manufacturing, sign manufacturing, and warehouses. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/65Ldn Contour in the Airport Overlay Zone CORRIDOR DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial(Same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3 and B-1 districts) NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Two (2) written responses received within the 200' notification area: • • Carl and Madge Smith, 13212 Glad Acres Dr., Dallas, TX 75234- 5201, in favor, "good for the area". • Catherine A. Jurgensen, 4138 Willow Grove Rd, Dallas, TX 75220, undecided about, "My property adjoins the property in question (2 and 2C). I don't have enough information to make a decision. I will try to attend the meeting." P & Z ACTION: December 7, 1995; Approved to Table (7-0) to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on December 21, 1995, and continue the public hearing per the Applicant's request. December 21, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0) to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on January 4, 1996,and continue the public hearing• per the Applicant's request to allow him an opportunity to evaluate' limiting some uses on the site. January 4, 1996; Approved to Table (6-0) to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 8, 1996, and continue the public hearing to allow for readvertisement of the requested uses. February 8, 1996; Approved to Table ; (7-0)to the Planning and Zoning S Commission Meeting on February 22, 1996, and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24(case limitations),the Commission was unable to take action on this item. 8A-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORDINANCE NO. 480-191, FIRST READING ARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 3 February 22, 1996; Approved(5-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) amending item#3 (provide a 5'Bufferyard'A'along the full extent of the east property line) to state "approved as submitted on plan, dated February 7, 1996 2) deleting item#2 (provide driveway entrance locations in accordance with Driveway Ordinance No. 634). STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 6 dated March 1, 1996. Note that in the "I-1" district, only 15% of the floor area of the building may be utilized as retail uses and that these retail uses must be reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure. With an approved specific use permit, the 15% of the net square footage may be exceeded under certain circumstances. S KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\95 CASES\95-116ZC.WPD S 8A-3 CJ. 282 28 283 1 2891 285 2810 12841 - ` RL)ro t ', oil , • m/ "'_, /� 5 I l ith!n „wm 2D 2G 2C 2E 211 2E 2J 2P f �•C �{ / -1-a r y• t/ P t/(1' r lil .14 RI!y: - •PA 2K ©•❑ •u2E 20 28 29 • , . moo. ! r . RI! LYE i 51 GO Ist.:eD - K 51Iy' ':1 • 2A cJ(j] } Mil 5B4E V 6-1/5.6---2AI - D I 1 __ 111111581121 592u' 1N d 2A,A --)- I♦GYA111i1 CO-- 2A2 `ND Sazc GR--- __J h _ 2/� I�I� 2MB L_ 5828 582A Y' T t-1nv M A S E W 5 7IS W - A 1 I83 18 I92 1 a7a •rFr -tss ___-. ...,.i Nommilal B NORTHWEST PKWY ST x • .ram ,� 6 ?E al a N, I I 1��/I�y1 i= I , 2E12© E�1 �• P_J 2E '~•K1M ', IR�D 1 Q GRA,lA '1 383 = ----I, • • 1,10.1 0 , L _ Kt ,Ewoo we ib,. AuS1W1 PLACE I -� --� J TNLAKE BLVD. I 32 1 , i ! I �T HIGHWAY \ 20 1B2A 1B2 lB L_.r---'-1- l t I I I t t • b•.a RAN _ 1E2 1 , I I I JT AE = — 1828 -1, 1 a N 1)4Q I‹ i b: .*.-.:1A t ; ' t I 3C 39 BB 5Q P �+.RR� s �t`i e 1 r I 1T ' �© o I J5 IBI zE FRES 2A3AI • ,�4�v sou , 8 .y a Ir i 2 2A3 2A2A 2AIA r. : 4 , BBI - �F� 4/116 3 At , 1 lST tri 2A •__ L_., !'1LIL SD2 3D IC I 2A3A K{\' `1289 Ac ijimrot...p.„...„.. ___ © ---- >^ N� L t< Orly 11A 118 + ' "9� 5 E 1D 11Er ---- P�,G �- ' 4 Qw -1-HOMA3 c.,_;TM _ BAN = _ BB ___- 3A 1A _--.V)Y --' y�4, SiMtl£ A=�71 t i _--_i-_ � ; ---^ :3.6 Ac -�- 7s KS-_ 5 SA _ t t __ \- P 11 LP ---- � Q 1 �;J GRp Q S „D ��' E5 -.1R .L / 11D3 (; SU A�}C 1 IN !_ 6G 4A1 `___�� .` i 1 ---Ill, 31 38 -- K 611 4Ai i �O`�,•.• I1D1 -- . aF;R B N r5rs; o v L 1104 1 I 1 1 r 7 1111 1m 5AI - __ -- ,-------1 1 i 383 3 I GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT 3 Ac // v 6 i�� 6.15 Ac I i wousavu Bow ei E�N15. 1 \ „se,. -` i i 6U5'N555 68 --- [, t ,PARK 4 r° PARK - T \ M I � INQU9 : 1 1 1 1 \\ 4A / •1 1 1 ` E�j� 1�11 M/�If�I 1 �A ,.-• iihk — ' ' ' __ wo>r A—roes I HER IBICD IB1A '/ . 1 lowMEG talc IB6C1 \ w �_ T re18C rel0. 186C2 15.6 Ac • `•� __-• IBti IBIS 186E , 382 - ' ,gR , --�' .__.n 1812A 1B11 OE ��79 �� 785E ire .— -{I 1 IBS , I66B 181 _ l� 2 I r .E MI 188G ( N 1 r 181A 1868 f i •1p 1 {1 ." 1 rest 138 1868 f IIT, 1 INA 188A 16681 ADD 1A , _ 1 IB9B 1BLC 18682 I 1t1681 ;1 1A MC 8181 4111 IBA 11383 I86A1 WICIC I 1 0 4A 3 1 2 1 1 POAD IBIS 4A2 o_4,8 � ,5 A< :/" ��{ -.. TRACT MAP lI � %/ - �( ADC En I G �/ L 1I -TANG . ,....„.. 8A-4 ' � — • -� SURVEY A-1153 L___ 1g �• SUS' S -. ,A AHG� A i O iUNiT• _•s t_ i i_ - - - - - I I i L - - i___4 L___ I Spin #7 Representative 3E 3C Peter Sporrer 0 J ) • r---I 0 S. McCarty T/v! A 6 A 2 -/./ "SF-1 A" "AG" •� i 6 A 1 A "AG" I C. Smith „� C. Yates .", .. B` V D !Ala "SF-1 A" State of Texas "AG" State of Texas J. Demlow r) i "AG" J. Gregory "1-1 " L C. Jurgensen I— , 1 . 11 A 113 Lv �� U '. K. Smith J. Stacy LiJ "AG" "I-1 " 0 U _ !� /.a i (- A -�-- -•/n �� ,' ,D) O I �ii " • 1 Ak _ FL __.11 SURVEY "I-1 " 4 R. Pack rh4 "1_1 „ I r ^ 5 ADJACENT OWNERS II AND ZONING —9— - — - — -1— . _ .)ic:_r 8A-5 ' . \ A R_ . — • • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-191 •N ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A.CR:ES , 'N SITUATED}INµ I'HE°NTH.®il%IAS =EAS=1 I2 SUC�:EYN ABSTRIA.GTO: 474 "T.12A.CT� A',A3N Wig RE FOLLY a AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM ?'A61 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT ITO J'S-P-2t''GENERALIZED"SITE PLAN DIS: CT WITH.CERTAIN.";O=I"'OFFICEDISTRTC'I'`"1= LIGHT INDUS ''at „4 -�.TRIAT: DIST.RIC"T�AND �.BlsfBUSINES§ SERVICE?ARK-DISTRICT-USES,SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL • ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. "" ' REAS, t e ity o our' . r., - .. '. : - e rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare,all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as 'AG'' Agrie to under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and ar WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\CASES\480-191.WPD Page 1 8A-6 S changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their S original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, Sis hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\CASES\480-191.WPD 8A-7 Page 2 S Being a,A7 2;2 acre tract of land situated in the Tliomas�EasfersfS ir�!ey Abstraet-Np: 474 T actt3A sand more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from i'AGl,"s Agricuttura District-:-Ito r'S-P-2"j Generalized.:Site:Plan District withh certain:":0-1 �:Office,;Disti.14; "I-1" Light Industrial-District4d "B-i" Business:Service,Pak Districtuses,as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; Sto avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. S Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to G:\ORD\CASES1480-191.WPD Page 3 8A-8 Ssuch accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR III ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR ID G:\ORD\CASES\480-191.WPD Page 4 8A-9 ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: • EFFECTIVE: • G:\ORD\CASES\480-191.WPD 8A-10 Page 5 SEXHIBIT "A" BEING the remnant of a 7.99 acre tract situated in Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being part of a tract of land conveyed by Mildred Banks to Steve D. Pritchett, et ux by deed recorded in Volume 6774, Page 752, of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, which 7.22 acre' tract is more particularly described as follows; .` BEGINNING at a steel rod for the southwest corner of this tract, by deed call 807 varas East and 1504.87 feet South of the northwest corner of the Thomas Easter Survey, said point being the most southerly northwest corner of Commerce Business Park, an addition to the city of Southlake, as recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 28 minutes 35 seconds West, 764.21 feet to a steel rod. in the east right-of-way of Crooked Lane and the south right-of-way of F.M. 1709, THENCE east along a curve to the left of said right-of-way with a radius of 1,974.88 feet, an arc distance of 426.30 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE departing said right-of-way, South 01 degrees 38 minutes 53 seconds East, 724.06 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod for the southeast corner of said tract and the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 'A' , ommerce Business Park; THENCE North 86 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West, 435.48 feet to the point of beginning and containing 7.22 acres. • • S i G:\ORD\CASES\480-191.WPD Page 6 8A-11 • T§AKM ar a j .or a it A F EXHIBI '�" "( • r'l__ I------ _ U- a "c 7 Pt7 j r..ml.. .. K FF Li —T )l _\__• I I 0 I I"1 nm.meo � ...-yr---_,-_ ___-3. —- .,»..t.0 y14 r - 6m li \ + 4 aw 1 Si Si 69 E "I li li ,tili 1 l 1. L1111111 © I I I I I I 11 C ,-> 11I 1 il 41 • gT F f Sj)/ I E a ,I F . 1 A 1 P<thi "ILp IHi p 0 i;4 ti MOM /ry i{ i 11``, I I I M I I I I I I1-(I I I'U i6 1 --- --- goo ,z ; vp (F.ti 1700) "itdi'hi ' iØtt'i ioi i gll ii gr llg l4: AtgJ ;ta 6 i:6 i a i_/ v3 d i 2 • E e o g t g �.. �o�....s....., .n.as. dcm..cvv. - .. 8 I - ocaamOPOCECKvas. aoac. ! *E COMMERCE SQUARE t l?l 'T.22 ACRES .wart, J {) •: I'y f fa THOMAS FASTER SURVEY a Q • . Z1 O AHST. 4'�4 t... ..... ...I �`�u� I• i SOVTHLAf.O.S. TEXAS t r. .J' ,, Ainn n�fl i R121996 , G:\oRD\cAsns\Uoit ",Page 7 L e iu 'Li L. •�v 8A-12 • REASONS 0 A4 i ,}`K VICIRl1Y TUX ,min K'ix..r w� ur I AO Lu D.-PM USE RI'\ I PERRY,E I'j Lun.-POUsmAL I :• LOA-Wam USE PLOP Kcs .t �,•' v PLO.B \ I1 if I sumaca nwca \ (`. of •x .DRo>m Ji _ j w_tsar t I..m• di a- ' 1 1 iDEdG•m• w�.xr.rw p a`�''pp J i 1 1 PROPOSED BDRLMO'C' O ? '�' / Pg V. = • 11 ' .� 1 8 w ' I 1 d I _1 (I INS I 'Ig R I II ka \ / LpS z®wi ;I 9 or 1 - .„1„ n a m u: Y m -.-- ( {CDi Y r D. 1,01�II IO M LIVED E I II ! i SPECIFIC USE 7.22 AC.., -- _ wo N a PROIRLION.a. - :..f y }I, CO ��''' W Y01Ndt ®8€�768®tlE9 �'� 0I !I;, ' eo..yel, s dip+ D�i. _ , A� - a Ia IIF. �' pi....• .,, b 1 . DAVAPIR POPS uIMOa na.'"°'"wK'n.mar 0 IIg in • I i p5�y ',w II�,� /�/ I �( St J1 nno I 11 t I '00 *a: ° W PROPOSED HUODMG'B' J i y�µLP.� p;,yy y a00 IIRPO i I I I. I £ lilN X I I PROPOSED . - 1-•' KEGS.DI'DIU m-0 L!A N IO t i d W F Drr a I III a i eURDMc!DI' a.n1m1I 1 0 i.m,,.aE.WE N F { .1x0tS"',ia ...._.._....I y ,.w.D..w c N I0 W —,�•'�''' _ /� ,Wa.t,.a... 1 aD..'"'�,d • P W W W d Q� I •I / .an`' .�"°u"°I r.lo. -- _ I 'O I I : �—J ^I� t m.oer om"' a N .7 I J— mE.oWi .-- - -__I =� I= --- ADD. u.y� —IP I 1 D .o..ODoPLICS OLOPPC OTIPR sE l U d �I -1 F ' MA PO :oL.""' z 0N0PI 0 R n .:"� W..WD, L 1aI— 'tk oI A .rA� P.wa c MOW 1-1 1 PLY.KNOR6 0O w�_tl,OR %6010 f' LOT4 o.N a-P-1 110-1 OSES PCP I LV.O.-WO USC ML i PR OPOO.POP LU.D,-WDUataILL {-. I1111 I FAR UMits WDl.'KE �D�JKL C '''1 I El III 0.w[ PAL W W" auw an lIIfi lamotr� J!L e ::::).) J!L H_.,1::_i_� 0a.r. Daaabya.: aDW., l40E9fa ®. OROy04CHDD[4 PIMA VW®mz0140000 •..1. I' .4m' i..W¢KW OT e.oSOoOE�WS]OO • '' N. ORO nnE W'W4 pt.Wi° - coneo-CDr 7 C3 _ / w -mom-or 0 �.J 771- Lwcr 1 OI 1J 0 • • City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM 10 March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution No. 96-14 ZA 95-117, Specific Use Permit for Outside Storage REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the use of outside storage for mini-warehouse storage, office/showroom and outside storage,per Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (27), being approximately a 2.53 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A(southern one- third) LOCATION: South of E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and immediately east of Crooked Lane OWNERS: Steve and Sue Pritchett 411.PPLICANT: Pima Properties,Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District AMENDED REQUEST: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1," "I-1," and B-1" uses as follows: Building 'A': "B-1" and "0-1" uses Buildings 'B' and 'C': "B-1," "0-1," and the following "I-1" uses: wholesale baker, candle manufacturing, candy plant or production facility, carpet cleaning operations, clothing manufacturing, cold storage warehouse, commercial school and trade school, compounding of cosmetics &toiletries, electronic components manufacturing&assembly, glass blowing, insulation application business, irrigation sales& services, including pumps & equipment,janitorial or cleaning services, laboratory, chemical analysis, general analysis,physical testing,linen and towel, service, manufacturing,of medical and dental equipment,pest control business,plumbing,heating,refrigeration or air conditioning shops,public utility facilities,pump sales and service, sign manufacturing, and warehouses. • 8B-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK SOLUTION NO. 96-14 MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 Buildings 'D1,' 'D2,' and 'D3': "I-1" uses as listed: wholesale baker, cabinet or carpentry shop, candle manufacturing, candy plant or production facility, carpet cleaning operations, clothing manufacturing, cold storage warehouse without size limitation, commercial school and trade school, compounding of cosmetics and toiletries, electronic components manufacturing and assembly, glass blowing, ice cream manufacturing, insulation application business, irrigation sales and service, including pumps and equipment,janitorial or cleaning services, laboratory chemical analysis, general analysis, physical testing, linen and towel service manufacturing of medical and dental equipment, mini- warehouses, pest control businesses, plumbing, hearing, refrigeration or air conditioning shop, public utility facilities,pump sales and service, sash and door manufacturing, sign manufacturing, and warehouses. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/65 Ldn Contour in the Airport Overlay Zone NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) OZESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: December 7, 1995; Approved to Table (7-0)to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on December 21, 1995, and continue the public hearing due to the tabling of ZA95-116. December 21, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0)to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on January 4, 1996, and continue the public hearing per the Applicant's request to allow him an opportunity to evaluate limiting some uses on the site. January 4, 1996; Approved to Table (6-0) to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 8, 1996, and continue the public hearing to allow for readvertisement of the requested uses. February 8, 1996; Approved to Table (7-0)to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 22, 1996, and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24 (case limitations), the Commission was unable to take action on this item. • February 22, 1996; Approved(5-0) subject to Plan Review No. 5 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) incorporating the prohibition of container storage on the plan. 8B-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 ARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 3 STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 6 dated March 1, 1996. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\95CASES\95-117SU.WPD • • 8B-3 t 1 282 28 1.283 1 2891 285 1 I }�R _J t �r�� 2810 2B4 `vv _ o- E ;•:� - 111Yrr7�61 ZD : E .;': : WA 2K . . t t <mu. r r r r r r , 1 !rj— rj G� 7�.E�II -- tA • 2A1 2A - - KE I E51 ffiriSB2D _G6 Y r _ p AP f�� If rr 2A2 Np1N 2MA sex zj _ N -A6R-_- /- —/� 1�2n 2A1B J l 5828 582A trF• Teiw MQa LQS Il I [1B3 18 162 I 4A• 111 suRVEY A-458 �a.t®® 1 p NORTHWEST PKWY 1A x9cT Ni-' 6 ST r4,1 . 2E3 ZEI4 2EI3 rL< N i 1A' II 2E r 9 f_ MA 1M: _ � �) �PEVI — I _J_.__ -J p i 2E3A � � K11'" 36 = YFIEL i IlltiAUSTH vuct Ir • "j U ' _ r 3e1 1 - NVIcw000 uu+C '2E_5�I unnAKE Bow. JB/ t I • HIGHWAY . . . . . . . Ir• •• •No. g. g. 1132E U NI;A !C — .--- - - --- .40,/ s At s 5• A -C, . '?A34 . eAt r I )1 3 3E 0x,, 3B Be 20, B 1st 3 1?RE za3AI zaz��' S� •- ,6AIA1 I , `" >y 2A 2A3 2A2A 2A1A t ,1381 mg ' 3 Ac 2 2A18 „nu 3B1 --� �� 2A, �� `_ Ls, �• sr IC I T �© —-- I _ ��• �- 3D2 3D 1209 k ,F�O i 11©118 i 5+ I. K s ..--] ID m I,E / - i P�1GE �t r�rL1 NO /� Y I -- 3AI1A ->�TJ_-O rW'�MWS._. Ch•c>T � _ _ BAN _ 1 ?� SURY£ A-l71 I 1 io_ C L t --- 13.6 k iBi, oAKCJ' - 5 5A - t I II lP R F - no , ME G�P m L y 3 1 1 1DlA I d r bG l 4AI ---r-T-( �R' 1 • 1 1 IIe:' . D . . 4 1104 - •I I I I'r , .._I1D5A1 6 • 383 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT )) 1 ( ll 6 ,,� 3At 6.15 Ac I y INDUSTRIAL e�w t. t \ E 5 E __ BU51KE9 r E N 681 GR r ��NE9 '1GREN4ARK 4PARS06E B 'A1\F EAp� 61 Ac 1Np 5-jRlAl- it --- ; \ M U 1 6P 1A1-r--r--- 11111 t.^..!f1!19!1. N J4. • 1 ....4k. -- •,SUPYZY A-101J 1 NER)'fA 1 iBICB IBIA \ Ni 181CF 11310A -186C1 �� _- `. • IBC 1810t -IB6C2 15.6 At �. -•- --- ---T 1812 1B15 -1B60 ZB ,ER `' _j-, 188S2 „18 1 -186C , 382 :- __i" l IBS ,181`IB17 -.B66 181 • 0' 1 '.) -- — '1813--I860 '8 --- , f IB114 F1516 -1B6G II' lON 1 , , I811 • -188 -IB68 r'-I{ �•••, 189A 188A -18681 App" IA s. 1898 1814C -18683 39 IBM -18682 1A1 IA ( : i8181 rrB6AtA . :1 IB7C IB2B _tB6At 1860 i _ IA A `I I694 J,�__ A 2 16 \ 1818 I42 J P080 ��,a� r. vEI L1A� Ia DE GG� IS AcG..Y A-IJB U ",}AR �U °� I � / I —_ 4 � M I JAc 5D' —____ Pp • =�d n .NG __ �. °Ra E 8B-4 1 ; \,U5,TAZA Ga I� Vln \ ��lID7, , NG =- I SURv£ 115J UU�S� - Kg SURVEY A_15,: _ A • L3` VD 2A13 0 --------- Spin #7 Representative Peter Sporrer ...), ,2 . / 2A1 2 3A 2 C "AG" 113 � 1 1 1 1 A S. Prichett Q. .(61 J. Stacy LLJ K. Smith "1-1 " 0 "AG" U S......416, '-- 0 -\\ii 6, sh- *Ni--kiAsu. j4Thq SUR VE "I-1 " . R. Pack Nt4 "I-1 " I 5 5A 1 ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING -- -)rr' - -- F,, s_ - I � c / 5- ,) C� . _ . _c_\. H_ _ _ _ S ) \ . - , , U a_ , . _ P AF\- s 8B-5 ____ . — . - 1 - - - — . RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF • SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPEC TC?:USE=PERMIT FOR OUTSIDEE.CONTAINERS ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS APPROXIMATELY 2:53'ACRES.SITUA't'ED=..IN -THE TH.OMAS:EASTER St1RVEY,ABSTRACT.N.O 474-TRACT 3A?; AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," AND AS DEPICTED IN THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT"B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, aFSpecafc Use Permit for_outside storage 1has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "SP=2"Generalized Site Plarl District with certain."Ore-Office_District "I-i"'Light Industrial District and"8=-1_"Business Service Park District uss; and, WHEREAS, n'µaccgrdancewitl _the requirements of Sect on 4S.1;;.(27) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such 40 Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for 'outside storage on the property legally described as ppra imately:2:53 acres situated i the'i'homas EasterSuivey;Abstract No.4744,Tract 3A; as depicted on the approved,Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A," subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. • . G:\WPRRES-ORD\96-14SUP.RES 8B-6 Resolution No. 96-14 Page 2 • SECTION 2. become resolution shallecome effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1996. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: S City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas • G:\WPF\RES-ORD\96-14SUP.RES 8B-7 Resolution No. 96-14 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" BEING the remnant of a 7.99 acre tract situated in Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being part of a tract of land conveyed by Mildred Banks to Steve D. Pritchett, et ux by deed recorded in Volume 6774, Page 752, of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, which 7.22 acre' tract is more particularly described as follows; ,• ` BEGINNING at a steel rod for the southwest corner of this tract, by deed call 807 varas East and 1504.87 feet South of the northwest corner of the Thomas Easter Survey, said point being the most southerly northwest corner of Commerce Business Park, an addition . to the city of Southlake, as recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 28 minutes 35 seconds West, 764.21 feet to a steel rod. in the east right-of-way of Crooked Lane and the south right-of-way of F.M. 1709, THENCE east along a curve to the left of said right-of-way with a radius of 1, 974.88 feet, an arc distance of 426.30 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE departing said right-of-way, South 01 degrees 38 minutes 53 411 seconds East, 724.06 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod for the southeast orner of said tract and the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 'A' , oomerce Business Park; THENCE North 86 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West, 435.48 feet to the point of beginning and containing 7.22 acres. • • 1111 G:\W PF\RES-ORD\96-14SU P.RES 8B-8 ---- -- Ak— fro cil CD 0 ��// • "� _ 'COG O .aS �� / R CINITY Y.PO A i,r I � L'kn' I \ f Y U-RCO YSC - / z AO ,M LUD-i.wsmw i .Gw TAM nLYD.- fm us I sZ :P^V �nu rn[n P.0.B 0I A SCATTER.OC'Ms .. ® A 111��3111 , ;z N •, 4Y .b". .. _ dg i gil,..ii 1 1 . � I rwr0ssa d" . .VII➢p0'OD' 4 Ow Anse•... 'p. '- """�"'•• 1 PROPOSED BUILDING•C' oO O / A; dg S �� Ig • A 1: 02122 ---� �5 Q P to , ,I - R ... . i, g I SPECIFIC use PER 7.22 AC.... ' ra:cim:vac`f°i ' RAI.0• !I a 01 IOC v antis'r.r�yDp�6n usa,a .-... mom.kimarMTO.me ffAIVER liltatTI .... to - . \ t i d{' B I g CCpp Can. eye & — Q 1To 'f .. D., «.. ....00 CrJ 00 ed 1 I II , or/ I I D VD I II tiI . `O°�• �"A.raf i � . - I PROPOSED BUILDLNO'B' y _7 S W N g....... II.— „« F. a M — a I I PROPOSED Or�Cc 1 `"..• F"••-• MAX V'llwl W-D Um M US= N W W I I!II . 1 DUDDdD•DL' +r.lm®rr ' C) ..[ U E. E. I I' .v,n...e.•.• ru'�°'wf'.c• [n _w'..�f'mi.n"u..ro c WW • .0 W MO. i 01 I : L DER. 1 ) i f D..MM."CLOW PM.. .R W..,a ;2 W a W� XN ILL tl— --mom `3—=adN-- ! is nr or F 7 1oZZOLOC ` a a Q d z ..--' — — JJova 01011. Rf �� t W AF V. L -r L- I .�. y "'M a SNOW P f1' ,1 I�I I I 8 _ i 0 TOl 0 L I II I LOT, 1 '_10.0.10.6 LOT 4 v r E.a rnl C �� ,r_7 h, k 2-P-1 TO-I USC ♦ Si..." I ..0.- CO KC Atm...�NAN.Rn..A•n a. �- 1�: LY.D.-wOU+OnfC .....•..,I��..... I I W6 nwa M D[9Oi[D.1L ( n III ..ter m�.oa J6 L 1 L ` L'J _ 1 Ow.r. M.l.rtt: WALL1 '--L=--' -". Q . 0CHX-0- 0•00AO1 0.0._ 6211 203 00I! . 11••.Na - --� ®4lEV ® PW4 Ca-Iso-o] .j _ Dom ,3i/l //i MOT 1 OP 1 // City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM • March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-192, First Reading ZA 96-03, Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning property legally described as Tract 5-R-1, The Glory. Place Addition as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1626 , situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, being approximately a • 11.17 acre tract of land LOCATION: 1111 S. White Chapel Blvd., and being on the east side of S. White Chapel Blvd. and approximately 900' north of the intersection of S. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Continental Blvd. A WNER/APPLICANT: Gary Hargett CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District I REQUESTED Q D ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density NO.NOTICES SENT: Seventeen(17) RESPONSES: Two (2)written responses received within the 200'notification area: • • Wallace Ryne, 809 Boston Dr., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Mrs. - • Hargett,on January 29, 1996,explained to me that the appearance of the property would not change." • Thomas A. Wilson, 100 Stonewood Ct., Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor, "This will add value to the properties in the area." P &Z ACTION: February 8, 1996; Approved to Table (7-0) to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 22, 1996,and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24 (case limitations), the Commission was unable to take action on this item. February 22, 1996; Approved(5-0) Rezoning request. STAFF COMMENTS: The requested rezoning is to accommodate the current uses and the size of • 8C-1 MEMORANDUM RDTIS E. HAWK INANCE NO. 480-192, FIRST READING MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 lot in question. Although the applicant's lot exceeds the ten acre minimum required for "AG" zoning, the "AG" district is not considered a residential classification when calculating bufferyards, etc. and, therefore, does not afford the applicant the adjacency protection that he desires. KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\96CAS ES\96-003Z.WPD • • • • • 8C-2 .----Y- •_ • 1,1 - / �.•��''S0r 5D2 r. .� , .51 Ac x • r+ �� iV 10 Ac 2c �� ,w, R a -�- _ , 201tf`' _....._�.. `fir. t., w� *11:5'. , '�' _ - -.Y f- , 15 / ► 423 At r epli�1 'r 0 . ••3 __, .-L,x . „R. , . _ • . ,,. ,. ., f, ...,,,,,,,, ii, ii,. ,. _r% ': © 5 i • 29 ..,...„•._, ,. t• r'r Q 2:1, . `N`,t- ,ir t'. --;• _. •—• , Of '7)': ' if " — vf INC . ... a _,_ ,-,1 Yam' — r V i J �►� a�x� .-- . _.,, % !II,.642 -isl •,....Isli 1 I • f• r _mat .011 r � � r' nV jam' r•_"• tt✓ i4i' -�• " ��:421.1-11111111.!... /� ! ` \ — Tyr ! i ! ! ! 1 0� r. G T. t t • I YT Ivo...L ,,i• r•. r t , sr ARK V ! �� ua►'•� 1 ! .. _ -' kl.� . 1 -4.-{• { •.1 �' i` 14 • '. !-. ..cow•sw.�'.r' s.y a:a 4 1 i 11111191, 1 1 . ., t 1,l. i ! •11'G c0"= r �. ., i �� ! • ! r' .1 ; ' C.,....: t i l-E -.....�,os - `—�_-'i... ..r- T i i ! ! ! . i i i 1 Y t 1 t �> • ,Sr t vv. "�Y ..•a,M.'arn:_� t 1 1 • �' to i '_ v•"l. -'{i • ' z ! ! ‘ \ �x 0 ct _ ;$, avy..4_.s.. �.im!5'- * '!. ...:'�'' '�ri^{. '• • ! ',�% • - i i --r. V.Sri! +1..... �1._- - t.•t.-• _� •. • 3 Syg3 tw ! '' •x J i i 1 S • . : i- ,--.. ,,„,,,..15 „ • .. 1 1-%'---4 77t,--1...et:11-4;.,. \3 •1' s ,.u.♦ R L,CIVJ 1 ( t) �._._ .... �VY 1�p 3 78 • i r .�,, i s ,•.•T_,.. - .-f-FQ l ! ! M •_ \-------; — • 1 r+ ..' i r t d ‘ii i^' F. Y, ! yJ ' \• ,•• •,w ...ram • r \- �.•3''. ''r„ A i -,%!,• i i •. It i'•. it. , • !: F �; t.,i .F.� ! t`4• .. i p e , Yip i 'V• 111 tE i i 16Y\•'T, , OV . , - \ / ip... 1 . t t + Y � Q� 2 r' 3A 1 1A ti i t • i i i 1 QpRG i.. 4 1 • ' \ 9., ?,* . sr Ill f. .\. .s , 4 t . . WM G1 �pP . • �-_ 'Rp` =` 1 SC-3 • --�� [' 1ZIIiIT - Suns ok Prop. "AG" ' "AG" TR 50 ( IF; 5C1 L_.---.-I°—J 4.0 AC 2.05 AC PRINCETON • S. Burnitt 1.,- F-- Phi,-----I ,. 'I Sunnybrook Prop! �� \18 R. McNamara , 11- ----•-•ram- -- - . � - •. -_.., 51;1 F .W. Ryne ,F `' . R R i J. Lutz arcpNo o� . , iSunnybrook Prop.;s lJ 58 1 ' ClLi Pierce Homes 1 `� :c.,Calvert 4, 'CW. Finkley s . 1 o �. - '�� T. ilson STONEKOOU a • I • • G. Hargett ; "SF-1A." , ,�—' oSunnybrook Prop. ,- f i - • I . )2 B. :.Ilin!linger i '�-- -- „--• • . ,wPo M. McCormick 46 L g I x ty l\A D _ t 4 _ - W. R. Feenstra , `R O'Connell 'n. D �1 -- r: R. Williams Gilchrist 1 1..SF_1A.,. , 4 , „ • x I ~ 3 • S. Sunstrumr - SF-1 An "R—PUD" 1)7 "SF-1 A" , A ' (250 x'6 him 1pACT • ' 50 % • r a 2 = 6 TRACT ' r _ . 4R TR A - 1C2A d I '__ x67 414 7U ' -4. 7 Spin #10 Representative 1 1C2 1 �I : a, ) p Betty Springer 1 C e I i -bbV C4l ..01n; es —Y NJ xu � ( -- --- - - ----E -CANT1N&NTAL-ALV0 - - - - - - ---- - - -•---- T .4 2 C TR 2D3 -- \2A 4C 1.85AC ~ \ 1 -� 1 • TR 2D6 ADJACENT OWNERS 4 IIII AND ZONING TR 2D4 TR 2D5 2.2 AC .10 0 r,, •\ . .i 8C-4 r, 3 . //,..,,i ,� TR ,� \ , • • • • • .. a.0,..• ' • 1 t F ;; Y.P _A "tom r 1. f .. `.., •_. — • . 1 • • ;; ,�• =z * CONN Or WONT • � .. u Its NTT, ample IN.etae:t.too..MN.TIT...NWT ats . • datAlTeed.I ,.Itsac the./.N.I. NU Neu e[.tract of • • last..leeprerN ll.0tf�e.elNH atSM.rn Torus>.ANNAN.NI.Nut,el Tar- • , • lltli.r./.nl.Oil•.e...z..t 1rto1�1.T.•P.S.1nt1..Lrt1r L - Na.[errmpt LrnetT.rne....•t m I.raleUl.rlT AWL • • • U..N..ae Toilet. . I:acT/.lee rlac>Ilo. UtalNee ts w Clt>e[autA ....Tu.. • Is.aT.Tee.�mp was r.m...�ts Voles tul .Imp.n. '. � . .at rpacr.T.a.neL . • • TR.T�.s _.[TENT Nast. -�_ TOO aral4 Ompa 1•wetru lm.y..a tsrm+ty u4r�lpt - O Stine f•IOO• • • .,at trey.tyta.ta,.Mt Aeola.atlne No Yareln.mp' " P.N./'Pp aa Tracts SN-1•L net T_A_t.NT O1ou Pa...on edal.:ova Ns Nut of . • . /e.tNe.Tarrut CNN,.SUN. TNT ea .. c l�an...Art, ;:.t andrHambyOI • • _ tw+l - o.lr>.m.I.v ^g�+gAaet.a Wts1 .Tarrant Oone• .T.*.ee 1�aT i _ yt T: la I IV. :• + • . • _ __•_ _ • 5511 • MOTT w.r.r.lew mpwtley.en NIA a.>pr.ne.\ly upwind.. .. •• . • IT'• 1 CI T LAYRt.T[RI/TRTTR4mperTel eagle[e..n.uu teo.....t rpacwUm. 1 .- 1...........be w•reab ettue.a.0 AT•deCLIAPT u w yam - >ti>tillT•YYii//1t ' .1 'f _ [oreul4 lutra.et Tel acTeultlgY ea u that-tea. uW.6e Nam for (31 _-- .wae aa NA acte':r:r:r`:'te t.e,'A. 1a w Nutley w.l..taua ;it 7 MISIrz • 1 1V0 UNITI wo MIN oe ate w l an o[ y't IT 1 1 3A..4A• 1.ttMV« S.L�`Gr 1 l _� OCAT1. SAP 1 ypr�v.tA•t..�. CMS + 00 ____1 :•N 4•WTITi It I , 1••/o"TT N. TAT TM N PwuC n. n Y- I rnlTttTor PAN Y•' hie ..M1•.4 NM t - („ ___71"Q'�ill —1C[1'O[•[f-L—lM:/x'—�.vnu..r.aurtZ, v,,,i� • • ;tr.....s�, • • 1 • .r ti 1< . .1 • PLAT REVISION n a. HasET Tr [ �Tme•_,{ • TRACT 5-R-I ' TRACTS NO.3-R-1 a ski-a. ' CITY CO TOIL woos'AL .._ ••T[ pnY A �4 t '_ THE GLORY PLACE _ ;�; i'� •_____,,o • • Sl TOA r �. • ,7 •E 0" AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT .:- //.]�,/� � tl1 • I. 42A COUNTY.TEXAS ftQf/wI/ .T A �� `/T(_�la�=ly STIR/ •REVISION Or TR•CT TOT.THE NOR,PUNT •a RTCOTOTO CITY TEC AETAnr I- 1 \•tI' - 1� _' • kl F- "� - ! i•a•`d. •n.Ya VOLUTE T131.0I TMtEMIMO.•i.[IOIIAIT•NRv[Y.•HTICi RO.lal N't � Alfa • IR.ATP IORIn/ C MIL • a.a{ .,1� u• 1F.• • i CIA a-, 1 I R •N•L a.e.o>' !i i • '^•r ...MT=i. • • r. ^'Al�.. • _ll p� �y T OCTANT.TURrnOR5 '•r�'z E I• M ht •10T TIL/L•Ot MUO f • 8I TRACT 5-R-2 r )s• IT. .T..,.IT. ' E•[.SECT . I I [• .Tale AC. toeti 1 I • 1Ng ' a uemnv CmTtr¢uIon �T1� nn 1, 1 .... '�.r...��.. ,,-._-y.y.-..e[Ttw .'�i� alai 1.�•:. Key_..` • f�._.. .. ....... li$:•:'�a 01. rim I.to that 1.T.P.male. .[.n cut Land • �. / .e(•... • Surveyor o[N.Tutu e[Tee...Paving plated w Teo.•.wen,.,on lea. ... ' ;1 �Il r ' R. ^`Y ___� act t mpreal et w around..^,Tut all cot corners..N anel.paata. - - •1 RULPM r•I�io NlLlle Tf \ • :m poNt•of cur,Nall ea properly earned m w Tre/N.NA Tut oil. .�•--••• ..s.. :I I C I O VOLT ITT-Ix/ Nee rerun.>repr.eAAAA Tut Sunni a hT•••er ar N alrectico net �1 L ��.\ .n Lallol.Il1��r.TOI/.. ' teen up•ralen. _ i�71�' • ••, re1'.er TRACT a -•- . j -- •.L r • • a:aSbR 1 aLORT PL•C[ �\ F O • L • i1 • i.l: TT..R . - 1, _I `I • / \\ 'OLORf rtIp[I Istea own[R_O[r[n VI1TSS NTT.IRC. �NRlj I 4100 CANT LOOP Tt0 SOUTII ';'�tlI TORT WORTH T/IIT • . i p... •lg.: a t:.- . • 1 THIS PL•T MID III. CAS[ NO.zA lS•ea >�r-- • xr • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-192 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY-DESCRIBED AS TRACT 5-R-i:,TIC:GLORY PLACE ADDITION °AS•'_.SHOWN. ON•THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET: A :SLIDE .1'626 _ SITUATED: `Ilv'µ.THE` HIRAM CRANBERRY :'SUR.VEY ,°,ABSTRACT% NO: 581 ,1 BEINC' APPROXIMATELY A 1.1:17 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM SINGLE-,FAMILY_;;:RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICITTIrO ''RE44 • RESIDENTIAL =`ESTATE :toi$:17.kicji, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; • PRESERVING ALL. OTHER PORTIONS. OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING,THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING • CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING • THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter. adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, • WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare,•all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and _ WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as"SF-1:A"<<Single�Fmly . Residential'District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person • or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by G:\ORD\CASES\480-192.W PD Pagel 8C-6 . . • the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and.protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this Ciiy; and, . • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly • •. requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, . . • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in • zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or.tracts • ,, of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City • of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: • G:\ORD\CASES\480-192.WPD • • Page 2 8C-7 . III Being a1'1;:17 acre tract of land situated in the Hirarri:C7r"anlierrySurvey;-Abstract No 681,1-r-Ct-5-R-1,and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from 'SF=lA" Suigle,f,amilyrResidential District to RE"'Residential Estate'Districti. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to . ' lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light arid air;to prevent over-crowding of land; • to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, • water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development • of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the:most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances • affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted G:\ORD\CASES\480-192.WPD Page 3 8C-8 until final disposition by the courts. • Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place ` for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law,and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR - . ATTEST: •� . • .. • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR III G:\ORD\CASES\480-192.WPD Page 4 8C=9 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: • CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: • G:\ORD\CASES1480-192.WPD gC-1 O Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" Legally described as Tract 5-R-1,The Glory Place Addition as shown on the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1626 , situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey Abstract No. 581, being approximately a 11.17 acres. • G:\ORD\CASES\480-192.WPD 8 C-11 Page 6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM 4111 March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 96-04,Revised Site Plan/Schlotzsky's Restaurant REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Schlotzsky's,being proposed as Lot 1,W. R.Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 2B, 0.826 acres situated in the W. R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 LOCATION: North of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709)approximately 800' east of Randol Mill Ave. OWNER: Schlotzsky's Inc. APPLICANT: N. S. Associates IDURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 1996; Approved to Table (7-0) to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 22, 1996,and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24 (case limitations), the Commission was unable to • take action on this item. February 22, 1996;Approved(5-0)subject to Plan Review Letter No.2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) forgiving the north side articulation requirement in item#4 (provide horizontal and vertical articulation of the north, east, south, and west facades of the building). STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in . the Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated March 1, 1996. This revised plan reflects the following major changes: 8D-1 MEMORANDUM likURTIS E. HAWK A96-04, SITE PLAN ARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 • A reduction in the size of the building from 2,700 s.f.to 2,189 s.f.; • Relocation of the main entrance and changes in the front articulation;and • A change in the roof design and roof material from metal to composition shingles. Note that on October 3, 1995, the City Council approved the previous concept plan,deleting the additional rear setback,permitting parking within the required bufferyard along F.M. 1709 and permitting a reduction of that bufferyard from 20'to 10'as required by the corridor overlay zone. They also deleted the 50' minimum driveway throat depth required by the Driveway Ordinance. KPG/ls G:\W PFIMEMO\96CASES\96-004RS.WPD • • 8D-2 J. WALKER i . ! ! bily i ! .. ! \-•-.4--S-.---i-•--. i StAnt-Y A-1604 . i I , . iIiii - 1_ i i i : i i i • : : ..0 1-•-•-••••'--•-•-1............. --- \I i '‘,....• i , , . , i 1 6A1 ...• 4 ,.- i 6812 i .,• I i•----1----i---- i ;?..,.. ,./ ! ! ! ! ! ,, 2848 2 281 Mil' IAIA ____. i____,8 i •.. 9 • 13 4:4A 26 4 294 ilf•L. '.iT. - ---iiiiii , Ilinialit 1A1A 1A1A IAIA IAIA IA1A 7A1A2A _•-•-• ^ • •-',/ i \ 21340/-.-ii..,.)---,-. 284E ! 1 •-•-•-i 1 ! ! • I !MAY -----• i i •, •t i • •-•-•-!--f--i-4.-1-4.- / 1 i i i --.4 i i i i :-•-• 685 MR ' j j , --r--.. 1 1 •,::.:1-.4-1--1-1-1..-. I 1A1A2G --- ,. . i ii \ \././ • ! ! .-.-. ....?C1C1 ._.__I i 1._. 684 1 .,,,,r19ill[JOH I - ----LE._i_._,3...-.4-., ,...) ; \ 1 .-i 1A1A3 __. . i , ! • •1--67r1+3w 'ft.' L-•-• --_,g2.9..... ,ALAJ IF, •., Eli .-1,...-. KELLER CIT 0 CM n, ; , .,. k s 4. iocoviE . I , ,.., 1•2•••••7 ._. likr.,..\ • • • -,.....'•,.. - -NM 3D 3A 3 3E 3EIA 93 --. 9 rsi 9 9 9A2 9AIA 1.-F. -rX ''..... s'•,1-,'- 'I SUME-1.- A-519 ,B D D D \* 1 •-.4.- • 6 I 2 [El \3 9A 9AI _._._...., 0 og .._.• ,. .\ 4? .... - '. • \• ;' .-- 1 --4 1,..,/ i \ \ ..0:1„, .^...,:•••• .,....i 2A1',...40111"/ i li \ ..., "A• . -gi i :- 0 ...., 1E1 S\ . \ j•-.4 ,c 0 ).• 2ATA ‘ `'''k / i •Y•-. ! % • • •• 99 xi - i i 't 1 l ilii ,ei . 981 r••••'" --IE , i •? ‘' , --rl \ '''' -r. r11.•( ,, ... . i it-. / \ i ' ....-',. • I 1.11 3G,--' 3E1 ii "I!. 60 Ac . .- -.... . •-'i 'i°' . • . 'ut..••,..s.--41,.,., _._ i •il9 r -). _ci_9C1 i.• 1/02 ‘ iiiilii • •‘' ,1 3H1 \ 1141 1 1 .11 i --I.-"- . 103 ID ---. g I-.-. ._. .),:1--.1!-• •rin•---ly-L('-,. 41.2) : i 3 j 7 •-----1 -- 7.;3. •--1 . f .,A I. j ••••..4_ a ., • 7C 7 76 7A .. 6A 60 EtA2B 11-15R 8 -r-A2------C ! .11..."-:rng ..." 'IM'''' • • .: inii •- -•-• •-'1. I .-4 -.1:-\ " q1,20'., . . ..,..o. ..:.,_,:... - •-.1.-•A .--?-\ %. \ \ • 4.- IN J. FREaHoun 7.8 Ac 2 •, 2.9 - ..:,'• ! .-.s SURvEY A-521 ' Ac :3, • ! t ••"" '-'• :%,!. • -k.. . •_4 -'-• (7, "' .e ..>-,3n1'1.-•_.. ._._,....- . 19 Ac 3•3 A6 c 9.5'1‘c 1 -• E1 -6 Cy.•orif,.. - .. 1 . '..„.40'' •-....-4 ...- • -•-•A,.-1 kc --. • •.;001, j•.•-••_.g.e:-:.._.1._L.J._i_. -.-- . ...,,,- ----.1-- 6;1,.8A2D8A2C App. -- -1---,16:quia. • ......„ lii % iL,2 ... 2 --ra---i A f 944 Px am' - -•-•,--•--r. •-•. .:: -4 ..../ t...--_:4 .-i-----_:E ir .L._:_._X 8 a-st! _._2.114.3P •-•;!! .4 ... .-f.-. 2 --"1 8 •,.. 13 13 11 I II • \ ' 18 JOHNsost ROAD 1 2 5 I --.^-1 . ._. . al 4.-•-•--- w ''''''- I . ..3 „ - .- -- ---- --- ,.:-* --- ---,,W.1702 .1133 ' 1 1 :2E5 2D7 , i ,„ ; ,.. , --• rT:rj_ 0.59 4.11. It? .----- 1AIA 1 .33CC1 Z°I'L ( 91t'--- --- i 3C2 cArz 0 . ....\,.."I \ .,\\ ! .,3 11M9 1 :•,1°4\ 20 Ac 3C2A 1-116 nt. I • . 5 OM, 0 4. • .. on„ 0, •.---1.--"c : . op...! PI' ,-...-. i E . p,P --.3 -.1. 1 7 El . ._._._. i 55 1-------I. •-•-•-,-.--\. • P. - 3/4 9.3 Ac -4-r- --r. .K5W.N EXVE • • •VEY A-530 i .- .1- ..... i --- r-;••.... _) gr I ' ‘ . •.----. I----1-----1 '--.-1---- 10 ''' --- .."'•., 4, 1 4. ---; lt Qs 51.4•71.EY A-1955 i 7 . \-..).. -;• 17R .). 2A5 k i \ ..,..,:g.• ,, 241 . 361 6 Ac 3C • '4Cio j't'..x , 3A .,..c. -4,.• i • 30 • 134 I . •Iv- i_s_,• I RP .....-•-f.•-•-• i'. . •-•3)---,-- 38 • 5A2A 6RPC) ••K5g 54._._.-.-1..L.--.- 6 Ac ...isall 5A A 5A r---2A 2A4 i A-18 2 ! I i 5CI % 6gI•15R 1 IC i e , Pag 3- 12.2 Ac 14.5 Ac i. - 8 • i 5 Ac . j. Tilio F.MHO...Tin:15mm! 5A1 sa ! IA1 4`. 1A4 4 . i SURKY -1 1• ; r•_.,-;•.- 1G,.., .....8.44FAc 15.2[1.173 i95.4A2A, II !.--7•-•'7-7-7,.:7•.--4517.=='• tilA .t 5 Ac mit ,r•-- i i - - i . ri IA3 IA 2 ;.-..,VARIC 5-i- .c ._ir.i.. _._. •-• i 2A2 1A28 5 At 6 '151°r11.:171---; 1 - -• • ! ! IA!A THOMAS J. T H®i\I P. (1.)N 7 1 te.N`' *to 1 I. I I I a 6A 6A1 68 682 6 6E i il i i le? !, 1.11 1 SURIfY A-1502 ) \ ! ! ! ir tio' • • 7 2A2 .,_8 - rule:r4.1:15me. 6 Ac 2 Ac 5 Ac 7 Ac ! 1 I' 1 . IB- 14.•=4944.42.• •..•. i ft•-• . ri I il I i i ••• j j i 154074? - /OP .: 1 ! . i..,11111t ---? 6C4 I 6C2 16C1; 6„ 9.65 Ac ( 9 1 .v. r i if 0 6A1A () , __..i3;•-.1 40 •,... f••-• --- i 1"-stalila, 11 Ac 1 6C • ' &la :I , ? • I i •.-1-- -- 6C3 182 i i i i 2A3 j 2A ow •alliwieuvilll.1: •-.3.1 . . . . • • $. 3 Ac .6A2 - El .---SFI -6F1A- -'"'' 6F2 1811 1810 ill 81Atj 1811A ,,.., i......> I F 3.6 . 9 7.86 Ac •-•''l 13 Ac It 1J i• 0.i. ! 1.1 Ac 6.1 Ac •. 6F 2 Ac .. - ..,...... g (...1,H ._. . . i •s- , . / i • ' . t - ! \ / i ,, . --. • ;'-3A - 4 KELLER CITY .LIMIT TRACT MAP , .\,...„ . . . .1. i. INTARY [•_. ._.:1-• i -! . •-•-.1 38 I , ,,,,, rr._-.1. 1,1 t 8D-3 '':.1_1_2,-2,\I---1---.A SCHOOL ._. -RED CEO A\iL • _ . _ - - rr7 ! 0/ --I y:. i V • CD / • --___ --- 0 22 1 ADJACENT OWNERS r"--- ---- --. (/ r 1 AND ZONING _) . -- ,:i --... - .., / Spin #13 Representative . \ i Rex Potter 1-- • - ---F H T. State of Texas , .,-- • . F. Joyce—M. Myers Ent. Inc.\ L _ _ "PUD" ______ ___J 1 Al 4 " " 7 PUD F. Joyce—M. Myers Ent. Inc. /"----- I I; 2 DKV (Sutton) I CS) R. Goode 1C) Partners. N 2 "C-2" \\- 2A3 2A2 . Southlake J.V. ri 1----( Ir-\ 8D-4 i 0 I 1 o .c I 1\ t 1 -1 5\UP VF Y A -- '_. i • :.0ENENAL NOTEI. ... ' : J LANDSCAPE LEGEND »:.... '"�� ear. ....ear IMO•,._.. yJCj •••_w1 i•aMr. .�. ` eRL. ti.•.. CAVOr • f IReE(RED OAK OM OW w oar. 'ram• C'C�x� "' rear rr.... .�r....~i •.rar.1..•Aram latae.A.• �,p�'-�•�y ..........•+ .rear... .. k) •&Ialoor...ns...olro.00M ::',41P t:'r "•^s.�: •Way.mu�.a....�. .�00 OM IN.um lf/"pi .:. WIMP STT4OPlT Mil(eMro1TRTLL Y4 01110LLr) ex1eTRY WOO „• . • .m1._...«..:.........�'•om ..•um. '•4 •♦•i♦♦•a. •.,w.1.ro......e.uwr...... exle*na L4ro Wee J.N.I12 UM 1,flole.MATICH ma,•• MI NM�s O.. .mow.. ♦��♦♦♦♦�•. •M MC.AS.....wn MAO I CAPS IX1FGR YMCA ton Nr.l y�� .fcY.i �,.,.♦.♦N 4 O.los. ri e. W nib .a° _ wr.w tam 0.•rn..r�.rYr. ♦�.♦♦ b0. 6MOO IREP TP FOOTW4 IAN.iN1PVR15.••0Im 1CLLY) �ry r seas.wbD P«a.•'Igoe T INg ♦�`♦,♦,♦., )d .0 Y it IL _ E VI v • ♦♦ (r Wa.N.111.1.C.WOW.. !NI .n11.•4(Nal ,M 'Ma(.I?. W Maw mo ... ...r•.. I�g ♦�♦.�♦.. •,-lola' a..l••Tuo..Me.u ,o .a,p.. Mel ...a••.*.1MM..• ♦!♦♦i♦�• .:4.;.•:,••MOM. ORettoe L.WOxArGG V. ) 'f..n. 1 ..... R ��♦♦• _ F'la IoY.uPMY�. A '' 'i 1�� • [:..,:l....o..U+lo+wt Alf ,a w ..vim w 110.7•r..'�•r~ WI.Dlua I ii:� e . 4'FW.0 W<^T tru..l I.n . R Y la* • • � .�r.— ear r......rw I ',.I.�W w..Y•�•�..:Val.... RllRlabtluN >,\ ••_•• I •\ ♦'�♦•ii♦' • 11ID04 FumMi,Io{zT,TA.011(• sex SU.Po 0.01are.e_ >...... o-- • t�jl -� 4: ,♦• M1lo uc 1 .cw vtw.oeucn'f(as .............. •••=MIS M• C�'N. I .'•.,• %A J` ♦♦♦♦♦•♦. PRIVATE GT•lN MA4•] •anew. • .e in 4 a As M�i....rw••��w••••••••cO PM yme.Ma.• . LOT1 SC il.t - ,'• .rC`Drra.•e, A •!i•♦ii....., `APO ORA•itlee r LIP.e.W.S la Am fT.TP.N •_•�`. • ,. q..:"•Bi�F& e 4 4 0 cs-. ♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦.. PM 00... IMMO. iI �'r• am.•ma IV •••+w�..m•w•W.•••••• Off amm zculuw .a.z . (■ • 4 n. •. u. ♦♦• «:m:. am.]. P.r..... aLIL[(.•kcal...Su r.M 9a ■�• t\. / �t •Ii: 7410;_•: T� ♦�Q♦•♦♦P•r :•ivP ,:,• :R...a.w..,.. 0:........MN._Area.:Rri«�..�..,_MN�.� Y - •.• t !� ♦•♦♦♦♦♦. .aMiio.'u�.oP.un'wP �.�� •Iw•ornrwn •'Y\•�\\. �`:` ! ♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦ vuwM .roow.t roGJq}• F•+n.MI e•.r 9 !i \�\ \-•• .• , ♦i♦♦♦i• W GALL..M euroRT ro.ro.rv.v.r oc 3 COMMOTION NOTES • .. : 4L arig t -— R _© — ,:_.— — ` •• ,rear t . am WO .':"T.'r.won... . outs o lb '� •. \\ \'• ♦♦,•♦♦♦•. .•...«ww ..aN.c.ww.T. . •'ro•F' .em"u.c.rt p R.EIM.. roe. getCa • ..... n wT. ♦♦,•�.�._ u wM ..rT _ .....•M WM .F11Yr•I.•Rrw« r •, 1 Pa} _7 ., �' ';1.... y ''"'f' M • .. ••••mow wu•�... .« Ir ...T ea._..Area. _.._._ T -}r I `s>, 4 5 ♦.i��♦�+Pea •• • IA 1•.!••..w rrer••r OM IV r rrruoo ul•0 I w '. • T•P1fµ1)(y '•^ •• `♦♦♦♦♦♦. . . OM..•.�r•.•.c•w r ra w.N wn•�---1 t I 1 V. `Ur'•ate IRTUTT•AM'IOYL •^•♦'♦♦♦♦'... . 'r.r•maPrr.•r....oft am. 4 ' f 11•" _._yI,• �...:�.... :♦e♦r♦. .••••�•...N.«.w or..ova am as I -._� I•♦.R,�N�♦�♦''.'♦''♦'♦''♦'♦''♦''♦'�♦''♦''♦''♦i'.'♦'♦''♦�♦''♦''♦''♦''♦''''''♦''♦'.''♦''♦''♦''♦''♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦''''♦'♦''♦''♦''♦''♦''♦'♦''♦C♦''♦''♦''♦♦♦''♦''♦'♦'♦''♦''♦''♦'♦''♦''♦''J. 6 AMMO..�•..•..••••.•It._...r•..a --- --- 1�•� 1 i'svmt x Via: i.`mama a err•` r! • .....AU• Oster W►•ql`lAo Tlwaor ewnue+a• r �...1si..P..n.�r.�r«.rw;a r 1 •..�• a=1.•••n�nw•...rP..M Oa ma • ///\ /� I . sad 1:." Q ...IMw • y LIMM.i.e.L ID 131 i • Iasism...r r.a.ma boo WATT NFL Num r r.•N.•....... ea t • I... .u•..�... 2 Sear NI0H e..0..urr ...•..Ma MI Mall.u Ctl11XL R•Nf6 O.ra..� ply UM .. _ Pea WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (F.M. 17091 !• Pea•..MaWM•••I••al.At....a.Pea.«..IMM. • LEGEND • i I- • • • . • • • .1.lL�i. . . _ ______ __ • -•-+ - umLOT h G.00K I L0r L BLOCK I i LOT I.Olo.'X I v r:�� .1..r.._.•�.•. aourMLARE CRQU5 iWlfa.w umA1w UOJM.1Kf ClCaew • ••.1r Pea•,.a.0.•.•a.. Nude II nuee II I F.IAHI II - 0mr _••WI CU.A.UPl Tan FAT T. CAD.A`LIDI:An RRT .T I CAB.A.SLIDE NMPICTa.T. _ •rr/rAA ZCPPA•a4' I ZRlD•Cd• I ZONCD'C•]' • • —▪ ••— _ WIWD.KM tie LLD h6)Mar,UMLSD.fl6R0 UM • •.-,— —•a��M 01 SITE PLAN wu De be 02 91GNAGE • AP • ^�^ SITE • ..♦ m ..r..r...mr..M• o..•••...1... TPSNC10A•an NOTE. PLAN �°'rr'.•.I..•.«... rw.rr..raw r............•.•. VICINITY MAP 517E 511NQ•IARY DATA m0A w .....a•1 ...►..a....•.. '•"'M•s...1.• .a• ••a•..e...n.P».•e.o..MC.....w.r••••••••G. n a •r.ea.r.•.•.• r•.ro...•1•Y••••••M .....•M 10..1.011wu•YwNn.1.ea A.••. �'••• �lwi i.• •.••tip TIXY, . OIREC7TONAL SIGN•lCN[DULL I••r.•.a.an NM MA 0••.na•aR...I1..•nw.r•....'..'T0..•.W. • ••R ".we "w•*ua^i°+1o!br Dais M.SO' Q •r.•n..•..•a a.A•wro F..M..o•••a.w ro r.r...R.n.aWLIM IL oeu+q w... It. Area. ..l.••...•...O...M..a..•..NO....... ' FEBF .A IAI[e' e.IE.TI.udaT ..:..mow:,.,.:®••.. •.•N..•.n1_...P...1...._........•_....._.... �y 2 6 1�g5 1,....•.a. 1 re.a. .TOR T•Y .. .. .i .oa.,{�•. • iw.....•a al..a•.e.o...•e.M !` 1 •w••••• h47y'✓3#�•.•, 0 orma.•—•• .•Led. ••14.1.44 •.«P.•W.....MIWt'r...•.. f •1!nMONS •.sell..•. « 010.P1.••L. MA N AS.Cnf••..w•.A•OM M•C.•a. L--:�,-F .wT '-- •PANT nib eRT •.••..a w.•Mr•a.Mw.n react R.••ols lid. - -._ D.1. •I-2•94 '.PTIOT O•lT,- • VT Tu.l dtT �M.ea•w•..•.•M m.yrt....n...a.n.0 .._.1\.,71`.;<r` % :'� w >7 n.n� r JOT dat.- • • a..l. . w.ea wart • "'II.a MT min• ...f T..UI.•.•a•!!FA" ...._._.- Shoot • NO. • M e•.f•TMY tact T•MM•ee•ll. • Ns..•LY•w M.,.rrr•. C. ;•. t •..4TMN • t a..Alt 9A 0/... 2'. • 11110 IIIII • City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM • March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 96-06, Site Plan/Village Center,Phase I (East) REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Village Center, Phase I (East), Lot 3, Block 1, being approximately a 13.07 acre tract of land situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 6, and being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat LOCATION: South and adjacent to E. Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114) and north and adjacent to E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1000'west of Kimball Ave OWNER: James Farrar, et. al. APPLICANT: The Midland Development Group 11111URRENT ZONING: "C-3" e G neral Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/65.Ldn Contour in the Airport Overlay Zone CORRIDOR DESIGNATION: Village Center NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: One(1) written response received within the 200' notification area: • Ritz Properties Inc., 1205 Ira E. Wood Ave., Grapevine, Texas 76051, in favor, "This City is in need of a commercial tax base, however,construction needs to be in keeping with the City's overall "upper end" concept." P &Z ACTION: February 8, 1996; Approved to Table; (7-0)to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on February 22, 1996, and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24(case limitations),the Commission was unable to take action on this item. February 22, 1996; Approved(5-0) subject to Plan Review Letter No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) deleting item#9A (facade finish materials) 2) accepting articulation as presented tonight 3) noting west wall of Kroger will have additional landscaping. 8E-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ZA96-06, SITE PLAN ARCH 1, 1996 GE 2 STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated March 1, 1996. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEM0\96CASES\96-006SP.WPD • • ' • 8E-2 1 1 �28_ �502�0�1< 114: ❑,. ' w J I �'1 I 2A4 B.7s Ac Mr • 80.1 Ac / v . _ I 711 1Q� saz I ` ' SCtC2 •,' I.__ l ••�gj, 2 1 .i''• i Si lo-�? 'f'`�` 0 19 =al �� A_!df .t. . -.—® .yea fi 3e dr....41.433..1,or, , 0114111 j =Rig soul NI F F IA c. S i 3• 5A4 � ��r1��JI'i11 � • 'tio .i THOGn�G°AS-_WA b&a g I. 281 M'�;!717298 287 794A l/ 30 IEv A 104 z I i . :"" sr i N'' 192 2B 283 289 285 2810 204 lA 2 s Sc ; MUM �� 1\�\�• / ��-•+. ':.� 3A2 3A1 F ij{� 20 2C 2C 2E 29 2F 2J 2P 3 18IA 2CI 5 5C1 50� +'- + R.77� ' I _- j �1�_.`� 295 ,. 7f1rr III .ix.� - u /r CITY 2C: •�99�r-' :1., Pj►� Ll 2A I© 2E 20 29 2Y ' \HALL 3A ......... .._.�� .--; {7 5=._ ?5 G� !�..:rn>t 1 A 2AI 2A 1J1`l 8 1 • ,,,r;- _._ - _._._ sae 11oy ,.= • N5r.... 5 sole � G��•"{5 , • Drtil E � ` 2A �� ! i- 5829 592A A • 1 ' 1 ! 18 182 1 iA.1 • NORTHWES PKWY EAST 1 J i R � i 1111 i fARRA ;,, o il � N 3p�'(F.ly 1709) 2A2., _. A _. BM. • — 2 m i ! i if i I i 40' 7A i I Al 2C 2 23 082A 182 y19 i ( 1E (-•�..!_._._._.'�_._._._r-.� Ti \_ r._.1 i , r'l GAR ! _..S - -' 15 Ac 5d -I aR1' 4R'��,A E4i i i i D w� 8 G n555 1r r i )� 30.6 Ac ':-�^• MIJ�OI� J• IBI �' RL" 2ASA1 2A2,,�4►%1 fA Ai I I m 2A 2A3 M A 2AIA - -- i J`� '—'— 2 1A18 ro ,) Y !II Pe ,y 3 AN 2AIC A' 2A1 t . . . . . . . .• . . . . .. . . .........f IC 1 2Ax 2A1 1 tr!••. ..mnr:1 - ! t .r.'� • 12.09 Ac ' ac�- •:�`.r'. •1% 1 1, i . I I I I I I % 'P' r• I . IIA 1IB \,j ti 1.::11Y :n..�4.T.:Ti�y.—. 1 - .. `' , ; ic, i . III ,_I ; —_—. g4. 0-V • HONt SAM _. i . • `X j n to PSI i it' f:E:i J!> I__ t ';o, ( , • 1(5-- s• 5A 'y i i f I i i i i i i i i 1 A 71-- _.--- _ -� '..,i,t J� 2 4Al 41 6i(� fil(I V• 1 !. ! i m P1 ! ! WI IA3 -- it, i♦"i`� 20 Ac { . ' • 1105A1 ... 1101 4C 1 C' •---1 ; 3B3 3 I ` GRAPE ,1 49 ;.�v: �l�dC A-ea7 '}6A1 •� i.I 3 Ac 6.15 Ac _._. RAINBOW ST. -._._-._.-.-_.-.. I II 282C1.. ;•1e- 4A 1 r 6.3:1Ac . 1 6A 1A2 683 68 681 II_ ti 6A1 1A 2C 114551tI6B1 ._.1 6C 6D '.6E B� •� , "`- yf" 61 Ac a 114 Ac ' _ RK N \ M�p� • 1' 10 Ac 10 Ad i^ A t t 43.0,Ac 6F —t-,�—_r__ � t `� 1k8 Th ,, ,,f FA:DOIn1ALD/•_- �tA . CON7NETAI B1.W ss`�STAP4I:T' A-f0f3 . �t!Q 1. :61,4 1. - TRACT MAP of2 •- !BIa Mc B6Z 15.6 k ,� ff�� 1T At tB4 015 1B6f 382 09 — 0 1 {• IBI 56f 1 1D 1%1 INS 8E3 lea• 12 ..:liiirsVr - BIB 165^ it ° OAR. % .,I�n _...:1 756 E N0RTHIPE ST .i 7; / (.- -- ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING 6 Spin #4 Representative Scott Martin 1 J. Farrar A I CA „C_3.. Wal—Mart Stores „C_3„ . al TR 5 Nc. Q1.1I1` T. ^^ 1`'43.136 �s I.— '� jFt\1`' c TR 6 a , .884 @JA I - - - - - - - - - --R.O.W. �OUTHLAKE —=BLVD. - - R.O.W - - - - -- -- - - — • TR r1 TR 2D % i . 04I •074 TR 281 / Dallas Foam 164 Ritz �,B_1 ., Tel Support - . "C-1 �� Prop. M. Frank M. Zembrod IR 1826 110_1 11AG q AG11 14.586 Ac: 25R2 t, 1.001 ® . rev lk) - 8E-4 0 -- 24 ,., ,, 1.1 i L•�" M A A_i'r •• '•----..— 30'ACCESS ESMT CENTERLINE REPORT r 'E.:: I ---� •.— m bi Il.., IAHCLII.75E •- -� we ,. u.v 10.. Ii •.•.. I • — `•-`- aortO 51)MEOOf] 1 rr mr+ T• � ? vv�T} II "a . NORTIiwCST ..r / ,DELTA•7911'50--' ---- NI--• TANGENT_70.75' - /�i,°• IiICHWA - LOT 5,BLOG(2 CHOLENGRD S'')T — — — °A`•flc tt CFO 9R0.5l0. 0..77' r — �M...I_b'-w!Y DELTA_3344lr 0•• / /• ,/-- - A, —. .A �' VICINITY MAP -� POW-sn Ngj- \ � - -b. T:i•�''y _ _ r LOT 3 SITE DATE SUMMARY CHART - R.9ee.00• \\- ,• •• S.' _ -__ I I ' _-_-- �munen tle._EE4 ..•axe .•oe urn �„r11._SI,O3• F.:,t'''.):;T.l::•'' -`I�- I swn.o .tr.. tire'. irm V rw - . p� '''s j' :1s LOT 4,BLOCK 1 I ,,. _ /= �¢' APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAY...:.:C.::: I'I .ASaR• n al it �.s�si.) N .as t.m +. - &CONCEPT PLAN •,•• ' .A -n'•A•.lti sias.r. Il tyl ) MI SR �f i.. III I .nt..c m rclu MS �sbu r. /,w sn SRAM :.¢ `y,Rb.," 5;'• ,xrtNeON AAu ail ol.An'gA.T ��T:i/iT00m� m r e • , N I /t'i^�� , \ I:I I ./ I e.rrviwc•s.as i�•Yr 4C•i f'Ot s.al QW / I :.;Si0. :H+yy,- At..1mn 37' \ 'I / rmrm r,eab OP 1 ®mmuewLSem h • `, "•E "t:'-''1. ry.a'. i;l n WACO c0,0ansec SPA.s..o.o>m / ,:#• G . /'. ow of bT •Nm � 4 ..i,' .•�._ `.�_... A III �:''•• -J'Y Lm!MU m09 IM Ant A.Kr LOT 4 e:/ - 414 ti` i,Te r. �__ + 'I: /. ' .00,Q C PLOT.LmK•a 1R�MM�1 +: hA • - III "-b d_�v.� `. \: 6)=SI'�_�N)ejJ 1�! t / •••/, LiTV05[D.....L.,YPnwO 1.001 IT .(r[.611 ST..Pee'tern R LLNf AL I011.MIMS .-.1 _1 .r Il.,g �4. ".4',ii,' tY /i ..., -•1D.e•M __ ma,.r.r.O.tutu ALL"` TO-""4! t,>..� - �/% �,'• ':� -•� ttt r''rt..I..avOC 11rt..NOT rO1am n.r.a CMOM1�fM T?•.. ♦ '°aa Ar. __ _ •_ _ ..o�n.ncr.Iow.,.rs Ram.:MU. .)}l::y� •'e7Ci_ 11`\ '-T-• :� r ® nlvwm facDm Eln.smrf .u.un Ma:AA It c.*aa L.m Iww KAM WAD a 10•ASAom Mort 41`:: -_ x'}. •a C' '• v •+it---�-` 1`\ \��\ I r--- '1� ♦ IL.n.Ic Ma..•x+Orr vw..q Ae.um rai ,3V., t1_�• 1 / ^+ - \\``�s1 J�-- REWIRED BUFFERYARDS k INTERIOR LANDSCAPE „yr•+t'MV s�j' � l ACREAGE SUMMARY p c T 'S'v�•7•,, •''}" "M� / �� LI UL! O O®U +�.1�'h1 -` •Isi��I /. ../ 1I' • KOOt�ii 2 OilK. .. .. lmt n® Semi ti, I]y7 sr. 1.,i, III �t®-- 'v / �'' /a0•a•.. •\ III LOT fu-rota ROoa 1 lab.c �-"i .•'�1. . . + " .� FUTURE j+ I I I 1 MIAQ LU1G AK zom..- r-�••ar .v...A.w e.t ,ro;••,y„ r n.Aa ww.Ir•a nor•.• - ^'� RETAIL • ..I(1i ( ,I I I' Nfu AO,44 70,as Ac . a n DELTA.rnra• r1Y TIM 1, 3 )�� I,' "°"'_3......'' n HAWS 4)O.W - a`W ..w0..0 a ! Ier I V I,I , . LD,OM 774J?T'� " .. ` - F: 4 '.I I ;I i ? ....-r..' r•r e aam.723.7e ...® r T Y,_Er; "�_f4?.-r Z:-a / t.. m4 I I I :t KIT �• i ..,..IMAM 'A- 'E4" 'Kj.. :A s .—_ i j-41 . 'gin e. 00 A.o..n:,.:fsr I > 15.04�„ ,. :� ® m �jn,1 3�1 ' .�m�smwf :;,,,,IA rro awLn' e.e.... ...+w moo `+, rd �� ' A'-I T T, FT, \ `61 '. I ., Z. I SIOILigK .y.� rm.:, — 37. N LUD. O .F.". RETAIL . o-a Ar...•.n.......�r.•r+uawm.-.w.. --Vl1ACE CENTER' ./..,, ire. .F' 11,•00 sr. 1 tau. APROVED PREIIWMY PUT I. pal S Irk•` • ` MLLAGE CENTER F; 1 ,.. .. I. ✓ '£I� S TjI I !'11 1uAit mr'�iml• LOT 3 BLOCK 2 FLAME ! ZZcwia tI ' r 1 ., •.? -=; ,',.;I y3I 1 COSTING .�...:eo....l... c,0! O+ I p • . r eAr. I )ilo :,II 1 '• I '1 NOTES •Uw awl:.rm wort AM AKA 5QI 0R • .N \ 'RETAIL , .ro ,r•vosm m•c t-,(w 0+..3 ! I O BLOCK a Nwa v I 1 Motu..An.9 v� ' •,11 I ;...Az l ,�.� rnrn �� :� Ava.tol;MAP MT.A,..e-.N.1..-aaaarl.. • _—�_.L®uaorr z ram.I .'.�` c__ Vpi I. L E =ars.m.rwl �� ' S. w0waInv oe w)o••iwni n a imDenn o.�e.� 'l c ! '�'• m:V\Y�., •- v ®I 1 - ` 0WivAroCi.a on.AK.RR CM.Tr...ral Nuts• 1't_:+ 2 G IJ�U ag rai `\��= A.�•sq'Y�S� •I 1.r - • . i I• 7'tar roue a Sam at[S r menu aa.Ai • -' ! I/ I <Tpf 1r1 1 1 • I ,'. r • halt MU Mr 4 SUM 9R rr.Otratm,or Sn In• �. �� ! I oni1�0T 1 BLOOK 1 _\ it LOi 2.BLOCK I I , '- RE�A i ,�j 1:cs;�Iv s'amrw.0 I - __.a'.w o..0 aK.r sanl a mcc a A..Iras `J�r J,. / r .. t1 111 A>'PROWD PFEUIINARY PUT : "sir' 'tie. I , ...... •. .-•' m•t %ec•�Oat A` o•ri.0 ran ffi.M •r 0 COIICEPT PWI ' .•!CON PLAT rtA H ••¢MCI.r0 A LOT 2. 1. k'• I", ,t.It..• 9`.iaT�+an„Q LF�`I(t' G(r x, �ryh•(••, 'Y.tr IGASO•10•uu ARO..LOWO./CO SM.IL'toO,R_ FUTURE ! , I ' f 1_. 0 ,Ik . t�1 \r t •:`'r'•I wfa.n.timer Af P.A.MUCH.~ C! j11 l� ��lat�ll A DETAILED SITE PLAN :•4 [ �\ N�, AAo�+ w�Dn.,un.o rnaAlw n.�u a MD. y .`„•. .' , bl �' .'13' _\r'1'%�`'' mla.naw�aroeas OF _Omer' ,,,,,,,.,,,. { - Ii;y 'E ,5�1,;• ...Kw.mm1"Aa'a*nr.Am^Iooem LOT 3, BLOCK 1 '�.'•� .eZ,�• l Iorr ,.44.I. /r I 1 E iS p wL va+a:5.0 OWL.NM as rr sau*awa - - — ...Mt -• L- VILLAGE TER __ ____. _ _ LACE CENTER--.��..— _ran m \�-` ,. 'g, . L---.-- ..�.. ____ ' A'�wVNaR'T ILf.IMMeT IM ORIr I¢Oa..l A.:Ai O•-r.t to•Sl.vcT,T.rL t` ^' "' x A.rwr taNA0.z 1..0 0IC m••0 BEING A 13.077 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT .u•arr • - -d72.4- ..... run ra•u Atom T.•...ea u.Oar OCT OF THE T.MAHAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT_I 1049. `� 's • N89'SS'08�W TD rr.RON OF KaDALL ME na.1...wow a!o x arnau x IN THE CITY OF SOUIHLAKE•TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS 872.42' 105e.a' \ FEBRUARY 26.1996 JBM • li �SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709)'e, . .. . A •°' M[Mml xl.v4.veA. ... - — ." City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 29, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 96-13,First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-193 Zoning/Concept Plan for Southlake Garden Offices Attached is a letter from David L. Ford, applicant for the above-referenced case, requesting that the item be tabled until the City Council Meeting on April 16, 1996. As we have previously discussed, only the letter requesting the tabling is included at this time. The entire packet will be forwarded when the case is given full consideration. KPG • I 8F-1 DAVID L. FORD 536 INDIAN CREEK DRIVE 1111 TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS 76262 February 28, 1996 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 I Dear Ms. Gandy, I would like to have my application for a change of zoning, case ZA96-13, tabled until April 16, 1996 to give me an opportunity 1110 to revise the Concept Plan. Sincerely, ()‘? / . David L. Ford S 8F-2 f City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM. March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-121,Revised Site Plan/Southlake Terminal REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Southlake Terminal, Lot 1, Block 1, Brumlow Industrial District,being a portion of a 27.81 acre tract of land situated in the John N. Gibson Survey Abstract No. 591, Tract 1, as recorded in Volume 388-127, page 89 P.R.T.C.T. The applicant proposes a 55M bbl fuels storage tank on the southwest portion of their property. The structure is approximately 49' in height, comparable to the others on the site. LOCATION: Northeast corner of State Highway No. 26 and Brumlow Avenue WNER/APPLICANT: Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Co. CURRENT ZONING: "I-2" Heavy Industrial District with a specific use permit for petroleum operations,per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (26) LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO.NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) . RESPONSES: Two (2)written responses received within the 200' notification area: • • Bill Stowe, 1710 Brumlow Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "Brumlow Avenue is becoming more heavily traveled every day due to the fact this it is a direct route to the Southlake Wal Mart, as well as housing developments in this area. If another storage tank must be built, it needs to be as far off;Brumlow as possible, and definitely no entrance or exit of trucks off Brumlow. Also, it is extremely important that the stock tank and trees in the northwest corner of the Shamrock property be preserved, as they act as a natural buffer between industrial usage and residential usage on the street." 11/ • John Thompson (Mid Cities Ready Mix Inc.), P.O. Box 660, Colleyville, Texas 76034, in favor: 8G-1 MEMORANDUM gibCURTIS E.HAWK,CITY MANAGER A95-121,REVISED SITE PLAN MARCH 1, 1996 PAGE 2 P &Z ACTION: December 21, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0) to the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on January 18, 1996, and continue the public hearing per the Applicant's request. January 18, 1996; Approved (5-0-1) subject to Plan Review Summary Revised No. 1 dated January 18, 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: February 6, 1996; Approved to Table (5-0) to the City Council Meeting on March 5, 1996, and continue the public hearing per the Applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary Revised No. 1 dated January 18, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated March 1, 1996. AkKPG/l • G.\WPF\MEMO\95CASES\95-121RS.WPD ' • I _ 8G-2 rf 3# iik z::....,,..1 .,,,,.., 20.2. 1-- ,-- . _A ,,,, ,,,.c.......1L_._......_r. , ___•..._ .., . 7A :,, .. , gOlJii --Jil-4 2C 2 .r.2 . . .. • I I I i 111A i ; ,-•••-. K.1 '‘-.. -N., --' 913 JS. -i 2E •p ftr"-•- 2A3A1 2A; Scf.,-1. 30 6 Ac -. .. •-•.. ORO" II Ac 2A 2A3 2A2A 2AI A .---. ' W 7ri AP '•!+.:.• • ' Pi\lr-f --- L.__ 3 Z' I P" ,A i 2 2A i ..... IC 2A3A \ ; 1 : 4111iIiii --• .---. •-• 1 -1.t.Illonlo,- .,.A. ' ......40-not •0.4mmmwww.•-• ! p ,.., ' I2.09 Ac A.:I 4 ; ••-•••.:..Z.,* i 1 1 1.117".1.• 1 , , , , • /* 1 .••'-' ..'-'-• • \ • - - - • •.•+-1--11-1,- -11-•±* 40 / • ....-•-•-• ID VE-- 1 IIE ^I,.c„•.::..'*i \•3...s..X. 1-1 ko-)% • ! 1 1 1 , 1 ! / - -' •• . %. - te:m sx'\ , i c• iiiii •._. ; '‘. ..:.x. s. ..., . ! !•1 1 • , N 4E1 (4&,.., :,.:.,.3-A., \ . . k..„,.. --LT$116,-1.41-ir-Li ry-i--1-•-± s---. --*L.,: ',, ,'''s/,t1r!.., ! j @N NJ ! A' FIN MAN E*; i • . .-. - 13.6 Ac *--1-- L.------------ 2,3 Ac ‘• ,. I i 1. .....4 % ' i "....../• / ._. ;11111iI ! •....',., .-. rowviswiwou.4:•..c4.46.---• *::;• i 1 \pi -/---3 38 3° i.._._.-.4.-.-.7;_,73-.-.. 49 1.,) i E I '6A"' 4A4 7. IIDI 1,X T •;y eK., 1 1 1 , Ol ile i 1 . BC."' BEI ,i...311.1..,-• 1 i • %. ll- IA3 i 11D4 11D5AI--- /1. I59 Ac —. . 51 ..----1 j 3133 3 I 0 3 Ac 46 -.-. --. '• 6.15 Ac , • A-803 6A1 4 111 --- RAINBOW ST. 4A - - % BA1 A2A 2A 28 2C1 i 1 I 8AIA C.) IAJ: 141'55 1 1 I I 8A2 1A2 1 BA 6.4,3)Ac 611.6-.----- 1 I 1 1 , 6A 1A2 - 683 68 681 1 1 ""'""lik, _ IA 2C •..4...i. 67371 61 Ac --ii---• i --SE 1.....I 6C 60 6E P i \ \ 5,A91/ 10 Ac 10 ev 13.4 Ac :"..:'.. VAIZ14 \ M ---1-•-•t .-6FI I6C i '3 . \ , . 6 \\ - 4 43.01 AC . <--2 ,.., \\ cc 6F j j j % k ili 6E:?, i i i .. . % \ ! ! ! •-- 2A2 11A1 4 . : 1 I ..?). ----'1,...."9\ \SURVEY A-101J . • .(6 R. Mc DONALD,-__.! EAST CONTINENTAL BLVEI1 1. . --. • .L. IA IA 11 El 1E0 IA A.._2 25 y 2 f 1 Alogith MCC 1144K lea IBIA \\ ft0) K El 6.3 Ac --5 -10F IBIOA -186C1 1B4P1-,23482A, ow ,...lam, _18,c2 • 15.6 Ac Il \ . \ ' \ \ 04 apd V — 17 Ac --.- 1844 .4;la442' 012 .. i1315 -1B6F I• . '84_..._L-J b IEMK2a.':1312A p'1814 -1136E. 382 * j al OP ., . -2A3 NIA ' 184 u_...... ..1114-1--\i859 '\ • . •- 6..„ • -2A2 INT ?.-,18414 "Th•c-"_.•`-gir-7•1177A, 181 • I IB4S a 18415 -a‘lifir-:1616J - 281 ,...---, ID: L' ITIAittp.001( 1,11.1:-/ Z !,1 , • g 11 i 'H--ugtL4''t----st!, .A ';','„El. :;',1: 113441 1641.2 1811 -ma7:1858 ONArf ION . . -.. ......''-- ON ' 2E1 212,... -...., 184613 184666 1B9A 'TM-718681 i,01) IA \ tliPkg • 44.66 Ac • 18481 1841.6 IBS° if= -18683 • 1A1 :7 .....1.L. 2E4 31.61 Ac 1134412 IBC ON IER13r=IBM 1B4D 11340 .11_19....0 IBM 106AI,, ,o,, -• . LA A . . . _ 1314 Ac 5.31 Ac 1848 iB4L 187C -unr:m6m 1 t, Val 2114 IOTA -1B6A 1 9.. - TH. e i 1 I 2E6 • 1133 1131B 4A2 ,48 •41,'"' GOV, _ .• IA1 7' 2G1 2H 2C SLY 2E7A HAIRROSON DECKER IS Acfr.LHI . 2E7 1: \ SURVEY A-4,38 •,6001Z5 2J1 1: dillikth, Iiili9 pit1 2Ki"/ x 51A P.M . joN f) 2 A-1453.--'....'.• • 051%I 1)" 2J im ein‘„0 NI_ _ _ _ SURVEY A-591 .k 18 3 4E V• n57!• 17.16 Ac -ritt. ,, ow ... .-r. ,..,... 9 RI/ 1 • 4 5,5 ._._._. .....4% 1 ,......,•::.' tk..,, 1 4}- so0001- 1412 sil! 5A -,..-...--,... ,.- .4 5A1 :32 0 '' 1.1160 cHEATH.k:.,..,...„. CONSULTING I TRACT MAP 1 1 1601 E. LAMAR BL1 (817) 548-0696 8G-3 B. Stowe II 043i "AG" K I Vibra—Whirl "I-1 " C. Emery „AG„ „AG., \ � `-' Z J. Wright "1-2" "I-1 P.U.D." lie ECCO Properties - c-T. 0 U . - /\ L 4E y '.'.)0 •• is 4, , i - 4D \I\I G. Mitchell M Spin #7 Representative Peter Sporrer Mid—Cities Ready Mix ACity of Grapevine ....._...A • l 0r ADJACENT OWNERS „I-1 „ AND ZONING — IF s"7 V / r.F. I iR.clr`i° 1 1 1 twOu 0.MAP I CJ.OOt1 I MS i1oR g 31.ra.ii � 3 I.1JI1S' WO pnuslc{L t---I I 1� i• J- t179-Ir £ °�'- Suu ___ - - _ \ --Tors e9i Too S i„s, '3.,, n _ .!♦rlUt4+/ 7� S •E v Ip•'''I-2 T�TiCJ 1 I ltA��S 1. •00 3-_-- _y_ __ �r { 5&9T A�..•I .. ',me vl{t Fg" `I I iy '•�"' 1 , !0'SE,G( Q ' eamcmrn7wr..... — =JI- .\ r S, -.Via wo_shwa- ammlaw, Ni'� / , � �J/fJ� _ ill tl• f II / Jail')7t Y'd+ BOV-1 MRL HA 1f A DONE ROOF ,�� .�t`■�■'I 6. I "�11 Sp>iC �,W ' I II w PUf£FOQRFPALQS LL IIICI �� 77 w1 G TOTAL HEIGHT o OttID1 r• ::%/ tn>_L\\� .•.0 rR -a A X II ` �',.R� II'Vi++�� ( lII\(]. I j�l RS a11fArs f :r eurtw PG / *,...6.1.1 ' / •:: ..,:i.:. . • miiim E101I �V� 9 /. lI 1I i p -; <' I I 1:.7"- L ' fze:"Im---Aako • 3,01, z /X4 2 11. lD! 6 dRl . I nine twt -- I i�Rijn, V I. i - Ii ER T.- 2,"'. ' • VJ4-0U,P.{B I 1r 1 �{ uu r y,a ,IrEMOV r• / /'rA.ccR•nc , m i��t� n.VIIO . I3 - I `, LUR II um. I l ±.�� c aAN 'tE°•,i:` R`)2 // /��►,,, A , _'____-_ .. air OE` / /Iii -- _�� .ja • ea.raur ' • Ivw•.n y /, ST • o vy�nlirvi N R� I I �� Irlllllllllll' 41111 ilardi,,,,i, III iiiiiir..: gli j � \�� 11 '� ,%.,, - • suls I /'''''l , - f 1I( 1 E , S, ___________ ____,.,„ 1 I ro, -_ J O�� `�1- �/ SCAfE: I"m s0' L015-R I I Iii /� '�.� I Fr OIII.N.'MR]R.K //jJ� /� 60 Jt 0 0 160 _ _- -- • IRLW..TA, ISW a� I, ,r1102� 0 1 -.. �'� o I 1 ,•... I� C -'.41 I /f" `+. rw�cmonucnml �pp • co on 1 CIO :3 r t / is rjA / a)uE auwwc 1'- K 0 • r, . (<' 'i /�� y4 / CONTINENTAL BLl9. -p1E sTO4Y 40'X 50'METAL BOWING 1 I 1, $+':' I. •I.0 $,{ F$�� //�% �+ A'�'/' -5T84AGE NAwiENANCEIREPAW li • I I� ! •I`=�.__ —�..��: .S•. '•'�` K, '•,'.Y tG / WAREHOUSE • '• $i 1.,w/.:v,"� - -ONE S/ORY J0'X 50'METAL BUILD/ s. •1 �� F3EIf{ � f #tI I1tA $iyv J�.P y ty /' APP YYY _STLl4ACE.• PfPEf/N£YA7ER/ALs lr 7��- •SY X rQ/i r. .d,�rY. i`$ 1r 7 '' ;$:;a,:y;°/-,'•.s„• jamffu 4 •.v).) 16 I In n .f r1 =}:. TANK COVERAGE ' 3i'r,:•;rr,.,;:.,; t' :>::n:q.;g:$.� f '`:jr ., � ExIsnxc -J.,ssa.o si;?�; .�� , {i:2E•,+y`. ;: :3 Y I:i k.>.•-I:l- ;, .,. /' / • lEPROPOSED 6.IJ2/5 SF. MAR 0G.;i. M � BU110/NGCOVERAGE -270000 sr:'IDr{RIR Ir�'�+} I•'t •:•¢:54 .',,.+• e'F+•.'_'I ti G;&i33y.=_:$$Si`%•' Ai ((:; A / <i <::, i•:a / �. TOTAL a J7,26s.10 SF. PAIS ty<Yc..k f,..yy:-.:::::: !.F:::c is•{'•�t -a / PERCENT O'COVERAGE m JOU' 1 II 39 �a � ��g� ;"="'`ems.'= 4' s�:> r�.�%,>�IM�'` '�•``� / /• ' 19963 I_ I E;t61 g G ;:.^'-,•{s•;Y,..;i.....:::n:ii%'y':%„?G �t..;.:: ✓�• 4 fi REQUIRED BUFFER YARDS �Io A rmnox c) E >;R:.• � •ai: +.'y:1;:%yy,,>x�';..,5••y�'•'%f�, O a 7RACf I 2'I '. g.• r :/..".1: .•/ /� •uct murzt run MOPE OW sw s HRUNIDI/OiDU3f'(OAL D(SIRiLT 91I i t''.C+':';:S 1;>> .: ::k:RS::::?^:?:!:!.fx ,l+:j th'y,> I • ,�q' nmx mt n� m¢s T..m.-... w r t+ )tu•1 +$2'ATi-i ,•%''''•v 16 m-131T )�L i{YYR tn�lS.tc..® {'ctly#:.yit+ f Y A I• ]3 IT) u!.cmO.mat[7.u).Mt Y yR�J�]t${//' ��:��X,((•..$�+/"V�`%r•/�O�'. i� '3al) OMNER/DElf2aYR REPO 0 A t s I.PDREfA CaIDILTC 1. yI V 4140:0 k f44�.W • L .y i Win Imlre•LU nsLT{-A iROYD Vlwaee 1 Pa.rds�-L 1 I(.$p$: S.GwA.:.'.:.f�R�flk fei''/ /' 27.20 ACRES A.T.p-K f�II "" }:"-'F-•:i'is RED''' Ia 0 T! t0 12{ tTaIAR iAmIG H II I > �v.,i:F.Sn i:=i.4�.ji P /�� no v • 1 i 1 uro-�. . /: Diamond Shamrock I .t6' +i$ Sq. um-u.r WTI TLN dnMl en.1 LAX/m w) '1 I {dL�,,,,_i�! � / Refining Ac MOrketinq CO. �o+D Ia c a n ISs �� •Y,,0,;:1 Vic,• P.O BOX 6Jl SO[TTHLAICE TERIGNAL ExTST. A 3'•::? r ' AVAldLL0.TEXAS 7G/7J *DIAMOND SHAMROCK REQUEST CITY O"SIXJ7HIAKE TO WAIVE 7 ��+s"•�i I. GENERALPROPOSED SITE PLAN (RLO.J76-SS6S DC B(iTFRYAROS ON 77S NORTHEAST AND SOUTH 90E(Y I I I. • ' : PROPERTY AND TO NODDY TIC BUiTERYNRD ON THE NEST - TO PROWDE 50 R TREES O•I T/Y TO 2•CALIPER TO BE DIANOND SHAMROCK MAC I KWIC WPAH urn v. a w� x }+y�Y / PLACED w BARE WAS ALovC BRUIQOW ROAD. _suvlhtab T.•inlrW,SmQNn�rti»u \ MEMOW1 Al AL Fj I 0 THE TREES TO BE PUNTED SHALL BE CEDAR EL(AUSTRALIAN `�Ir ow Sei Vat I �■•y �• dOr PINE OR RED CEDAR. mm'•ny� `•'IM/St A.o'uoo G J —11 /, usE n.rARs-I)I•gS{ .roti DISHAM-C ld1.F �.:1M • III III ill • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 96-12,Preliminary Plat/South Hollow,Phase II REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for South Hollow,Phase II, being approximately 10.650 acres situated in the J. A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6B2 and 6B3. The plat proposes 17 residential lots and 1 common area. • LOCATION: North side of E. Continental Blvd. and approximately 1,100' east of Carlisle Lane OWNER: Robert F. McMurray APPLICANT: Carter&Burgess, Inc. URRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: One (1) written response received within the 200' notification area: • Sandra Ann Haynes, 44250 Rodin Ave., Lancaster, CA 93535, in favor. (Response received February 20, 1996.) P &Z ACTION: February 22, 1996; Approved(5-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996, amended as follows: 1) allowing the 15 ft. building line on item#7 (building setback line) as proposed on the plan. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated February 16, 1996 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated March 1, 1996. 'G/ls G:\WPF\MEM0\96CASES\96-012PP.WPD 8H-1 V,,. '( Al;v- �1' .1B3.z_` 1 �. -1 I'��}W3A•�1�T 304 III I -- JD 'I(F.Ni 1709) - 2A2� — •AP- 6GtiFJST S0IJ THLP1(E eLw-- __ _ Z B3PJ3B - • __J— 1 7 1 1 3C 1301 4C 40 7A ; 2C 2 2B IVA 182 18 i 1E2 ..�,4--_ �oOB,U1''1 _.�. - �_� I� i` 1826 E,/'r.8�At �•t� _r.�, _._ 15 Ac Q�jJrJ„�. J^ <1 2.___� RY+`r2A •-. 30.6 Ac ,y1pV / _._._. - V l�7 E L.r 2A3A1 15 Ac '(.l J` x 2 2A3 22.11 Ac t A _ ^1` , , 1 1 ,r-H t I , , , 1 ! t t 1 i� 7, i 1C 2A3A 401 4 I I • •1."2'.. 1 i I '\ 3 is `.%11,•,• .,'\ 1 4LtL, ... ... .fi.-1•�•-'r•i-'r1t--Y-" c70� ' --_-- _- ` X ', 10 ,ntt . i i 1 1 i I i i ! �II 1D .�-- -_-. ._J \ �Xiv.` . lea it nA. • •[as : i i i _f• ' t �-$-••._._.-_. 4EI :-1E., '.•-t1A. \' -a* .jr; ,. AJ.c-'117JI._k_It-'i-'-' ,p I 3a 1a 1LDOVI 5� f� M. : .'[TwT913.6 Ac 91N 0 j.i 1 •t' / \ ' ti i i i i t i i i i •\A .__I_— 0 20 At �- i), .1 I i i i .. S 5 ti S { ! k i r-._._."N_�._�—_.— 50.71 Ac 'l�•i' --•—'—'--•--/C'—A g1 i F4— --'—'— ._. •ki"' ' I i \ f'E�� 3�SB 'i eti -4- 1 ,4 4F .p. IT'•_ J'' + I i 2� 1 I `• l sC ' I 4� :y �-` a■ '•frY 4A4 I 1.3 .._ •, L. 6K 6K1 E I l i '• 1 m T ENT i ; IA3 ---- 1,1 O 20 Ac I 7105A1 CO 1104 �, i �1 1 -•383 3 _ - vv:- G;AL�E- �: I , a +: A-80J 1 L. f. iii 3 Ac 4A ---' RAINBOWS. 6.15 Ac I BAfA 8AI l A2A, 2A 2 2Cl ^---•-_._._.—_._ 1_ m E ; 8A2 IA26 !! L� 1 I I I I I l BRA 6A 6. ,IAc 1 L --. I • 1A2 68 681 '1 1 �ranattl.r•,. 6A1 , I .1. .i. IA 2C -1 0 51 l_k E1•.-k-- •. '..., 6C 6D E 8�5 Y --'-. i FW-`--._._ ,aL. ,J/ , �p0 -�`. _- „ � -,4'-- _611 6C w o Ac I,Ac' 13.4 Ac = Rr N \ 1 M i--•h . PA ; , 4'. , , • 43.01 AL � \ \6Ew [a, t iI \ , i ii \\ \_ 242 I I ��yj. McDOOb illEAST CONTINQITAL BLw. , jj _% .,_ -1 \\\ StA4L4i'YA-IOtJ! 1 3d.ii fA 9 IBI .. IA I 2 2f •_2F1I v IA 1841 f&A�� IBI ;� 181A �� /-(� Avi..4..., .Y �3— .4K ,.._. •-• jl ��, `a �_ 2 17 Ac • 6.3 Ac 118 0 ' t,Brti 191 C -186C2 15.6 Ac ` t RNV•` _ 1912 ' tet5 ,BEf s • 2A3 f`>�y ,Btu 2e 1; >,`'l814 1185E 382 I9/D au _. I .281 I ID �' I 1 1...._ ,B 5 19Q5 13411 " IeAtl BW 181 R � ' 1 A I 44.66 Ac 1Bi41 18416 1B9B 136C-7,66 16683 C 1 tBW2 1&Ll tev 16602 IA \. � Ac ?F� 31.61 Ac ,ea IB/L7 „lv: ,B7B, ,06A,A ,�c 5.•� (UTA�a.Cc��R 5�M IB7[ lG Vv 151%� h U U 0 I 1 5 31 Ac 7BM 19TA( r., 'MA I 6 2E6 163 IBM , 48 AO F ktni 4 E T 8 Z11 2C1 2N 26 � tllll�W�I�OIIV DI CK SW 15 Ac S 1A7- L Rg \ \ 2E MSTpv NG 5969 rd^'7 .1 STA4l4'_l' A-4. •'c ',r"'t,. 2K1/ 2J1 2K l Ai 2G 1 ,f 5 'fM 30 Ac v V .P.R. 2 SPpNG 4BI U JOONd 2JR G�Co3$0N P IA ID 113 } SURLY A-391 \'C I 11.16 Ac INQOgi.iZ�L ; .88 Ac 1 4D �i L•.. ii 6K 4 ' .I . lee41 G\�� I A BOG SP Ill- 59 scH001, st T2 �.:... -:. sAl ....LA �/ H E 1 2D TRACT MAP CONSUL 1601 E. LAM 8H-2 (817) 548-0 411/ ADJACENT HERS Spin #8 Representai� AND ZO NG Patti Minder 1 A2A 2A 2B 2C1 Southlake J.V. 1 A2B G. Foster "SF-20A" 1A2C "SF-20A" 1 A2 `� ,,/13 6B 6B1 1A0 2C 6C 6D 6E L' 10 Ac 10 0 13.4 Ac' B. Farrar b z x "SF-20A" 1] D. Rockenbaugh , 6F U "SF-20A" "1-1 " 2A2 tiR. Blythe --- - --- --- - --- 2A 2F \ ' 1 B4J1 - 1B4K3 1B1OD 1A „ � ^ ► �-, �� 2F1 � 1A 1Rn I lam, 11 1 S. Haynes C. Emery B. Adams "1-1 " „AG" „1_1 „ I — J City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM 0 March 1, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Request for Sign Variance for Central Bank and Trust Chandler sign Co. has applied for a permit to change a freestanding sign for Central Bank and Trust. On April 20, 1993 the City Council approved the electronic reader board sign for First American Savings, who were the owners of the bank at that time: The existing sign structure is 96.25 square feet in area. The proposed relocation of the electronic reader board and addition of a line reading "24 Hour Banking" would add 50.46 square feet for a total of 146.71 square feet per face. Central Bank and Trust will also be adding additional directional signage, which is permitted by the Ordinance. Section 16=C of the Sign Ordinance no longer permits freestanding signs on this property. The ordinance only permits monument and attached signs. As a legal non-conforming sign the S applicant has been advised they could change the copy on the sign,so long as they do not increase the area or change the structure, as per Section 24 of the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Jim Hagle of Chandler of Chandler Sign Co. will represent the applicant at the Council meeting to appeal Section 24 of the Sign Ordinance. Please place this on the March 5, 1996' agenda for Council consideration. g . BW/sm Attachments: Sign Variance Application Sign Drawings Section 24, Sign Ordinance wp611 xpdocs l wthead.mem l agenda l ctrbnkva.wpd III /off I I • . \ . I , • , . II I i 1 uRE • , 404.:.N_D ED-1 5' tEitiFf2 YARD —'1 1 1 1-YF'E A 1 PIR°REERsiTLADPIL: E , — ae..- — --. —me- ___... .-- — ---- ..—__ a Ps4A-SE 2• ) V in<I PS4AsE ! g — . 219192" I 1111 — — — __-,- 1.1 F-- i_, , _____ ,3UIa LI 1-------k-I-- — >- Ct tu II Arti2O'LlEGIIT I I I . .1,. . I 1 ta le PArKING. 5-RACES I ti f -*\st2 • (I! • . I 1 ..2 1 \ I 25'F-IFLANE • BRICK WALL ENCLOSURE---I fE.' 1-1C7Ti crzFc.11-14 1-6.* 1 1. - • . ..... til I 1 I L 4 TO I'm 1 CLOCK A 1111151°F. W • .. -• - ...- . 14_42) 1_1 1 • • i 4 TNR-15 DRIVE . a • I . • •i(r :;n -: - I . 1 • 2 xilltilli si CONCRFT I 25' I R 5. 7n 1--- :-.•77.:-------•-.-•-••-•-•-•-•-.-•••••••••••• a . i------ 4r_8. 4a.,. ..47:- - - - - .. . . . . . . .. . ...... . . .. .. . . . . MOB 2 C 73 T .. . .• •• • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • S IG" .... . . . . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • •• • "•":•••.•. " " " . %1M.if:2 ......:•.•"."•"•:•"..•.•.:•.•. sc?. ./64‘.12465- ' -- -- ----- ------ III -.c.. JO . ..,MLIC-RkSAN . . I -•.........-.•...............-.-.-.-.-.-.-•.‘0•5c!6.137.--L7:: •Y:::. .• -••• • • • - II I 1 . :44.40114.5.5 I ti3 • • • • • • - . • • • • - • • - • • • - --erre- - - - - IP PIMA P: 1.52 AC: I I t . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 10111111 i• . 5P2-C3 I I I • • • • •• • • • • • . . . . root 111111$31111 Zit Y-•••-•-••••• ii • I --:;..---11-75---ite.P . • tallilli i - .. Y • A . I t • •:(11 1.....r• k i tii &. \ II 1 11011:Slii 1, 20LIGHT 1 ---1-•.• --A: Azr_jl\p---St..16 5 i,_S•...,t 13. i s' 1 POLE I 1 I ! k/4•.E. ItTy 1 l r rrY eillii; stsi sn:a6 -- R 5'1111W (4 iir R5' _ I I...18 • 29. _iFS LANE 10'.,r-"-"e 1-11-`•• ..------ STATION tit J . . T R5 502TA . P - -•- _...---- .I d.T.) • • • ' .......---- • • 1 o Tir-Ip • :9. FL.00/2 1'16"T -r • .iv ....--.---- : ...- ...- -- CLOCK I gA.CO „. __.--.-- - • . - 1 _ VII -2-77". -•-,...-- • . ,iiimirk — • • --:-.------ r :_:__- &Lea' "- -- • ',.i .... - r_-=-- • - .- --- • • - - - - • ; ' •- 'Vitr_r_E55 • -..:.r. Adl. IIIII. 156 . . • • I • '-i 7 —E.:A-StriEur, : • r , . . - - - - - . L44,05c.APE-t) ROIL - . . -1 ----- - . I - . -- • '• ' ' "1- - u.1 Lo I . \`•-.... 411 Ar) at 4 1 I 1 ......,./ ‘a- a_ ...._ _ - -.. __-- ...._.. . •- -.. 4111 1.•7 0 CI al g 9,4-6w 7,9___! Q 'f4 i 7h / ( ; TI/ C' 3I2Sk9-W /v '7/- N/15/X9 I in a c1 .3 )c rA — 4 • 12' 24" I i EXISTING D/F SIGN DISPLAY REMOVE EXISTING EMC AN ALL — 063 ALUM.NESTED PAN 1111 I P 0•+- BELOW-SURVEY REQUIRED ER- tw ti&rN�, *.' (1'DEEP)PAINT BLACK I I MINE EFFORT REQUIRED Central I 10'-0'+- • , WHITE VINYL COPY AND ARROW I I MFR.AND INSTALL(21 AE94 EXTRUDED t ALUMINUM S/F CABINETS-PAINT BLACK- +"Motor Bank I 3630-33 RED VINYL LOGO WITH 800 M.A.ILLUMINATION-COVER TOP + " Central °` OF SIGNS WITH A.063 ALUMINUM i,' WHITE O/L AND'&" • (COMMON)FILLER — QA ?.' FLEXIBLE FACES-WHITE COPY ON 2'SQ.ALUM.TUBE SUPPORTS ' Bank SWAPCOPYANDARROW - n $aril; Trust A BLACK BACKGROUND-2039 RED oN OPPOSITE FACE PAINTED BLACK :c: LOGO WITH WHITE O/L AND"&' 'F (2-LAYERS OF RED) to .. 9"DIA.X 1 B"DEEP CONCRETE — it; caiko�sel>;ta;4_e:,'...- -:,',F4 :�t2tL6. SUPER GLASSKOTE PROTECTIVE — PIER FOUNDATIONS 0 •--'t t FINISH ON FACES RELOCATED EMC "x '" •AE 96 EXTRUDED ALUMINUM D_/F CABINET x,. PAINTED BLACK-800 M.A.ILLUMINATION t FLAT PLEX FACE WITH 2ND SURFACE y»x VINYL GRAPHICS • © D/F ELEVATION 3/4"=1'-0" ter ,, "24 HOUR BANKING"-WHITE COPY ' ; ,F; ON A BLACK BACKGROUND °Qr' STD.COLOR PRODUCT LOGOS ON Pi 24" �"I A WHITE BACKGROUND '' ' MOUNT SIGN BETWEEN EXISTING BRICK — .063 ALUM.NESTED PAN PANELS SUPPORT COVERS AS REQUIRED Central;ia, (1"DEEP)PAINT BLACK &T •s O WHITE VINYL COPY AND ARROW \ EXACT SURVEY REQUIRED Motor Bank-� 3630-33 RED VINYL LOGO WITH •1' WHITE D/L AND"&" J QQ D/F ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" — 2'SQ.ALUM.TUBE SUPPORTS PAINTED BLACK 03 • . 9"DIA.X 18"DEEP CONCRETE - PIER FOUNDATIONS • REVISION 3-2-20-96-REDUCED SIZE O S/F ELEVATION 314"=1.-0" OF SIGNS A&B rF 3} p >u u 22,21 m y 2 C C �O '" ' N "�„ ZZF 2n s3 1 ZV7_ '"o ,o 9 l7 C m (n O F MI MI P ° V ZZH°v ti y rt°Ai mZ•� m4)m7�c gcA�SA m gm H- A~mZ ••,'„ L Q y -ZI AZ AA 0000000 g F lz F1 Pg tmn ° z0 0, _ 5 I� ° p.F2 z _ = a m z p z 71 ft•- 6 111 Yi oN Q. o y w ro ti bL ww m (o m "'{ 0000000 nI E§ 9m - a2.T5• I I 8• ANDI REVISEDIO ADDED SIGN E AE 94 EXTRUDED ALUMINUM S F CABIN MI ....._._.._........__�.......___..__...._..__».._i :At:TAED BLACK•800 MA.ILLUMINATION • i 24 Hour Banking ILGRRAAPHICSWITM2NDSURFACE 41! wan f1Sin• ;PLUS • BIUARCK OACKGROUND E COPY N STD.COLOR PRODUCT LOGOS ON A WHITE BACK GROUND ---- DRIVE TO}IRU FASC1IA AS REQUIREDF -- TO CLEAR GUTTER OS/F ELEVATION 1�=ro• END VIEW r ``� ,r,D _= — _ _ `; Sp1 E Hy'•id, r t "Y f r: I �aFi ti rrc x . � s _. � f�'. CENTER SIGN OVERaC '•'. •-4 `)� � c.. �:•. FAR RIGHT LANE rF ri> zr 11 �; z o- .• REMOVE EXISTING - "�f ' '4°• s ti • LANE OPEN/CLOSE MON$A&B '` ti.;s INDICATOR' C`1 •o:" .• NM C �� { • NORTH OELEVATION N.T.S. oc SITE PLAN N.T.S. - Zsg. FF(+�+ Oy'2 NO, vmi � m R1.T�. `�` mGI m0 i� ;T v O m vv , y�" H Z1 AZ AO 73 rn A Z T CA A ❑�11��0❑ m a Aga VI us CAA O P ~O N = C " m R gU InA ..�.3.. 0 O g 0 Z O S^ z m ❑aaoaQOQ❑ ° salt y ! N ^ -, R. 4 `S 6 �Y � D p > W y N U ill b L "�"� n' m ..� e" g N ❑OOOOO❑ - - �. 2 "t City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 29, 1996 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Developer Agreement for Lonesome Dove Phase II, Sections 1 and 2 The Developer Agreement for Lonesome Dove Phase II is attached. The usual requirements of a cash escrow, or letters of credit, or performance bonds or payment bonds are provided in this Agreement. Because the Developer is planning to construct this Addition in two sections, this agreement will cover both sections. The Developer has submitted and has received approval for the construction plans of both sections 1 and 2. City engineering construction staff will require a preconstruction conference before work on each section begins. There are several items that need Council attention and these items are as follows: • Tom Matthews, Developer, is requesting early release of three lots (19, 20, 21, of block 1), which abut Burney Lane and have two fire hydrants for protection against fire. These lots are not included in the 10% release of developed lots after installation of the water and sewer mains. Please note the new redlined language addressing temporary all-weather signs within paragraph B. on the first page. • On page 10, OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: There is no culvert expense, however, there will be downstream drainage to a retention pond on private property. The City will work with the Developer and his engineer for the design and construction of the downstream drainage. • Paragraph C, PARK FEES: states there are no park fees. During the construction of Phase I, the Developer dedicated 7.976 acres of open space. In addition, the park was constructed with plans submitted and approved by the Park Board at the June 13, 1994 meeting. The park will be maintained by Developer or homeowners association for a period of three years after substantial completion of Phase I or March 16, 1998. • Paragraph D, PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: requires a perimeter street fee in Section 1 in the amount of$11,207.39 and Section 2 in the amount of$15,343.75. Since the Lonesome Dove Addition was preliminary platted prior to the change in /o 8 -/ SCurtis E. Hawk, City Manger Developer Agreement for Lonesome Dove Phase II February 29, 1996 Page 2. perimeter street fees, this Addition is being charged the $50,000 a mile fee applicable at the time of platting. The fee will be collected prior to the start of construction of each section. Please place this on the March 5, 1996 agenda for Council consideration. . BW/sm Attachments: Developer Agreement Map of Lonesome Dove Phase 11 • wp6l l wpdocs l wthead.mem.age llonesme.dv • /0 6-of LONESOME DOVE ESTATES, PHASE 2 SECTION 1 AND 2 DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of the'LonesorrieDove E states;::Phase2 Addition, to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 72 lots contained within the Lonesome Dove Estates;Phase;2;Sections 7"-and 2 and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: I It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. Since the Developer is prepared to develop óicñ1 of the Addition as rapidly as • possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building S activity begin as quickly as possible and the.City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release lofsT9{ 20 aticl:2l :.block"2 afEer:;signiiig;the Developer Agreement;:and 10%of the mm developed lots after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied, and street signs with street names are in place. femporaryall=weathermetal-sighs securely"fastenedinn thegrouifdare`acceptaable until perinaneritfstreet signs are mstalled]The Developer recognizes that the . remainiiigbuildirigopermit`s:arid Certificates of Occupancy for residential • •dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure includingpermanent street sigh with°blockinu fibers and iegulatoiy'^sigtise within the Addition have been accepted by the City. This will serve as an incentive to • the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed. Cc, City,;agrees that Ph se 2;Section 2will.be constructed at a"later date,:however developer agrees that tlusAgreement,:covers;bo"th:sections and:no.work may commence on Section 2;until Developer has complied with-all requirements of this'Agreement: �D. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and III agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment /D .B,3 . ® to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at • a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Each request for reduction or payment of escrow funds must be accompanied by lien release(s) executed by all subcontractors and/or suppliers prior to the release of escrow funds or reduction in value of the account. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. • E. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing • the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. • If the Developer chooses to construct bar ditches within the:addition.in lieu of curb and gutter, and the City approves the design and grade of bar ditches, Developer understands and agrees to provide maintenance on the bar ditches for a • period of two years from the date of acceptance of the Addition. Maintenance • includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, and erosion control. F. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow • required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. G. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities -2- GO 5-1( S shall occur at such time that City,through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. H. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure for each section<of tie Addition:• 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent(3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; • c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time.for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. S -3- /D .8-S The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. I. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility,the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. J. Any guarantee of payment instrument(Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. K. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company . duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas,provided that the City, ® through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with • plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for • the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. 4110 -4- B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers,reviewed by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE: Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are applicable to development of this Addition. D. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation cost of street lights, which'is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and -5- JO6-7 ® between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later maybe made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. E. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities • will be installed in accordance with the plans and.specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further,the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. F. EROSION CONTROL: • During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed,the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc.,to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works,there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas: If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contractor City forces and place the soil within the • Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. G. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as 410 . -6- /0 - 8 S walls,vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. H. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, signage etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets, and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities ® can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer's Agreement executed. 5. • The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co-insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. Developer or contractor shall furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which will be providing greater than a$1,000 value to the Addition. -7- Jo -y ® III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition,the Developer covenants to indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any-act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. ® C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications.Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent Of the parties that approval by • the City Engineer signifies the.City's approval on only the general design-concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2)years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the . completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, • agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. ® -8- GO6-/D 111 D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period,.the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however,that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section.151,309, Tax Code, and the ® facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, otherthan machinery or equipment and its accessories,repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. ® -9- /0 6- // • 110 IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFF-SITE AND/OR SEWER PRO-RATA: OFFSITEDRAIN°AGE; Developer:;agrees Wil stallvdrainage facilities in,accordance rywithDrainage, Ordinance 605 These facilities shall be in accordance with the plan?and §peelfiCations tocbe prepared.byyDeVelopef'sengirieer Arid apprOved`by theICity Engmeerw x Developer agrees;to provide to the City all easements required for the installation of the dramage facilities;priorao the.start of construction:. understands that the Drainage Ordinance, Section 6.06-B, requires pro-rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development. This development is within the basin served by the box culvert in . The Developer construction. B. OFF-SITE WATER: • . Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be • prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further,the Developer agrees to complete this,installation in accordance with Ordinance No. • 170 and•shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. • In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost. PARKTFEES Iri lieu of the-nbtin-d parklee required in OrdinanceNo.483a:(SubdividOil Ordinance);article VII Parkpand"Recreation•Dedication`Requi:reme its,1 evelopen satisfied parkrequlrements•previous t nesofne Dove Phas&Iii7D rnng�the • • development of Lonesome Dove;Phase-L;."the Developer%dedicated"7w976 acres of Open space':The Developer.agreed",to:improvewthe park mYaccordaiice with:tlie plans previously submitted and approved by the-Par RO—dd on Ju iT r3 : 994 Farther,Developer agreed'to•fnailltainthe park either directly:or through.a hoineowriers'association fora period of three(3.)yearsfollowing"substantial completion of Phase I of the Addition7(IVlatel%16;1995) D' P.ERIMETER:STREEr"ORDINANCE TheDeveloper:agrees tO pay;tlie Perimeter StitefFee°of$50 000/mile in accordance with'Section IV-=Paragraph B;sub=paragraph 2;of Ordinance No:494;1 Approximately 1;1;83..5 feet of Section 1'abuts"on•Burney Lane Arid"Lonesome -10- Jo -/a. • Dove"Road and approkimately.=1;620 16efof`Section 24buts7011iirriey Lane and Oh LonesdthDOVëRoad: Sectiona!will eAtire a-TerimetefStiret,Fee of $1:1,207.39,whieh7shalrbe paid`before the beginning of construction ih Section"1,, and.Section-=2 will regiure Pehffietër Street Fee of$15,343 75,whichshall'be pain-15ef6fo7t1i05eginning73f construction m Sectiorr2 : E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree preservation Ordinance 585. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address • Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor • ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • wp6l1wopdocsldeveloper,,agrllonedvei,wpd -11- • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C)must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits.exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six(6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2)years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 41111 8. The customer any pays and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. -12- ®'_ /13 11111 f i fill ..". • . iii;1,1 igi' ' ji 1y � ,. I ! v,�70 W 6 azw' b /iil bilk' _11 11;11 f J11i1= I hh 14 x 1 1 I i )1 1111111111111111 t''; 'a ' 111 V311111 ''I' f.s 1 Iii l1 � € t:Ili �c8� '{'J's Pii III! I Iiiiiiiiii!J JJ!iJ • I1 ' 11lilt !III Fbjilj 1 =tip l 111 1111 11111 1 41; I#1,�a z=J A�1ii.,1� �'1 14 a is I 1 1��1 1 j1�,`f! I aaaa1A.sssssAaaa a,i•11 1 . 11,i1 f1 , lai 1,Il rii r 1 < . '' '! 'Ilk!I/ 111 111111111111111i 4111,i 141 !°o ' , ' , �,1i E lff 1 i [ x il id! - ,i -,, 14 7 7AABARsssssastouAt A 0111 tI; i i-1 i�Wi 1 iEs 1 1 g~ji s ii N i b,t.i •-1 i I *1 ; ' J1 IIIIIIIIIIII1111 Ilkii 11'1! I%ililil It lilEt !Jill!' i 1-. ' 1 d a r " 41111 ,1� ii S.,AAaAYAARlAicai 111154 i i e� i I1� 1' ii ",� 5i a gf i ,k . 1 %b 1 IIs1111S1iiiiii:sIiiii 1l li 1,ai 11ljpi4'- 111� g5 1. ! !g1 I , 1 i l /11111 1 i5i,! !l. iial:ll- 1.!1 is !i4 ! io .; ' i J 0 6. iI AiAlOflt Inc OUvieowi ••En•4 •g f s o 1, IS - , s ,va : .. ,�\ Al-L9 •.. iB. ..It r �.cw g ---j----- --.-.J�.------ --�ccx--..•3ec -L toatataa_ _ .".� 4- at. i �w r sow ..'. z Na , .. 0 8- 5 3 s ' A9E R5. 75� —a5 A5 a5 : a 5 15 . , al Rg I a,, 3 ) 11 i� I /1 RI :I 13 ;. a ' r: aI . 3 • 111 79^1{ ! 5 �.—'i-- - 14 h=� _i,�_ +n` t d�;� 1 i ' 3 y SCR k eaa.. -FA F ors , • 5! 7 :,,7. r/�,; .. . .1 ;fib 6Ers q laY 5 71' S 5q � '� 5 �" i Aei p 4 111or- I -I 11'- E 21.. 00, t` ' ' : 1 ri, . —, . ! iii it:•.:••.-; i :, , -,"; l, ,1.40.-. . . .1 _ a- • i ral = —yell .,. [11. ,1. • a- r-5.` ♦ �_ .\ 1 t ,. :5 Ia -I% 1 ': I ,I d- •ro,o oa.nvu ip a 5 .• \-\ " .-- I n r lir IS I 5 ! '- 5\••• , ...? -.. 12 .• . =2....i ‘ S W g 6- 1 "4 :,..1 ji< . ,,. al i 1 . • ,. sl . \ \ s ,,te, ....:%, \'5. 4- .. - -- , j g r`.:' -1 \ IN i Wg 1�t aI I! I� 1 21 ' 1 \\ f li gi I sc a 0 tl Ow .,i ;: .1:‘,..e,...-..?„,. e4."1"--... '\3 \\\\),,2 i • .. -L_ill, — -----1,--- —I- III ile I -_,' Intl -ri; -11 1 • .:::\. \ .. ). '''. i ...0. +� \\i \ J g-� Isis lsss=ii,eissj! s I Ne j ^l \ a \ E f` lsisllss311111ism • • 3 I o^ MvE : 1 a \.. lsfslfssf1i11115411 • ! -c a�o1a = • -• ll1 a y 1 I - j 8E n 1 ORDINANCE NO. 480-_ • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY PROVIDING A MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE REGULATION IN THE "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, THE "0-2" OFFICE DISTRICT, THE "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,THE "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, THE "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND THE "C-4" ARTERIAL MALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; BY MODIFYING THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE REGULATION IN THE "C- 3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND THE "C-4" ARTERIAL MALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PHAMPLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and S WHEREAS, The Ciy of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. amended, as the zoning ordinance of the city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake now deems it necessary to amend Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to provide a maximum impervious coverage regulation in the "0-1" Office District, the "O-2" Office District, the "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, the "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, the "C-3" General Commercial District, and the "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, and to modify the maximum lot coverage regulation in the "C-3" General Commercial District, and the "C-4" Arterial Mall Commercial District; and WHEREAS, the city council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendments of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 18.5 "Development Regulations" in the 0-1 Office District is hereby amended by revising Section 18.5.e. as follows: S \ \ "e. Maximum Building Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area." Section 18.5 "Development Regulations" in the 0-1 Office District is hereby amended by renumbering Sections 18.5.f., 18.5.g. and 18.5.h. as Sections 18.5.g., 18.5.h. and 18.5.i. respectively. Section 18.5 "Development Regulations" in the 0-1 Office District is hereby amended by adding a new Section 18.5.f. as follows: "f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: All buildings or structures, parking, storage, loading and other paved areas shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding seventy (70) percent of the lot area." SECTION 2. Section 20.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District is hereby amended by revising Section 20.5.e. as follows: "e. Maximum Building Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area." Section 20.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District is hereby amended by renumbering Sections 20.5.f.,20.5.g., 20.5.h., 20.5.i., 20.5.j. and 20.5.k. as Sections 20.5.g., 20.5.h.,20.5.i., 20.5.j., 20.5.k. and 20.5.1. respectively. Section 20.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District is hereby amended by adding a new Section 20.5.f. as follows: "f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: All buildings or structures,parking, storage,loading and other paved areas shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding seventy (70) percent of the lot area." SECTION 3. Section 21.5 "Development Regulations"in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District is hereby amended by revising Section 21.5.e. as follows: "e. Maximum Building Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area." Section 21.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District is hereby amended by renumbering Sections 21.5.f., 21.5.g., 21.5.h., 21.5.i., 21.5.j. and 21.5.k. as Sections 21.5.g., 21.5.h., 21.5.i., 21.5.j., 21.5.k. and 21.5.1. respectively. • 2 l \ c -3 Section 21.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-2 Local Retail • Commercial District is hereby amended by adding a new Section 21.5.f. as follows: "f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: All buildings or structures, parking, storage, loading and other paved areas shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding seventy (70) percent of the lot area." SECTION 4. Section 22.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-3 General Commercial District is hereby amended by revising Section 22.5.e. as follows: "e. Maximum Building Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area." Section 22.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-3 General Commercial District is hereby amended by renumbering Sections 22.5.f., 22.5.g., 22.5.h., 22.5.i., 22.5.j. and 22.5.k. as Sections 22.5.g., 22.5.h., 22.5.i., 22.5.j., 22.5.k. and 22.5.1. respectively. Section 22.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-3 General Commercial District is hereby amended by adding a new Section 22.5.f. as follows: "f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: All buildings or structures,parking, storage, loading and other paved areas shall have a maximum lot • coverage not exceeding seventy (70) percent of the lot area. For the purposes of this section,lot area shall not include any areas that the Texas Department of Transportation proposes to acquire as future right of way." SECTION 5. Section 23.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-4 Arterial Mall Commercial District is hereby amended by revising Section 23.5.e. as follows: "e. Maximum Building Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty (50) percent of the lot area." Section 23.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-4 Arterial Mall Commercial District is hereby amended by renumbering Sections 23.5.f., 23.5.g., 23.5.h., 23.5.i., 23.5.j., 23.5.k., 23.5.1., 23.5.m. and 23.5.n. as Sections 23.5.g., 23.5.h., 23.5.i., 23.5.j., 23.5.k., 23.5.1., 23.5.m., 23.5.n. and 23.5.o. respectively. Section 23.5 "Development Regulations" in the C-4 Arterial Mall Commercial District is hereby amended by adding a new Section 23.5.f. as follows: "f. Maximum Impervious Coverage: All buildings or structures, parking, storage, loading and other paved areas shall have a maximum lot 3 coverage not exceeding seventy (70) percent of the lot area. For the purposes of this section, lot area shall not include any areas that the Texas IIIDepartment of Transportation proposes to acquire as future right of way." SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 8. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or S refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 9. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 10. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or phamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. III 4 \\ itik -5 SECTION 11. • The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1996. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY 5