The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-09-03 CC Packet City of Southlake,Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6 : 30 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's Regular Council Meeting Agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7 :30 P.M. 1. A. Call to order. Invocation. B. Executive Session Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.C.S. , Section 2(e) 2(f) 2(g) . Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. C. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 2 . Approval of the Minutes of the August 20, 1991 Regular City Council meeting and the Special --City Council meeting of August 27, 1991. 3. Mayor's Report. 4 . City Manager's Report. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Council member or citizen so request, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business, and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consider: A. Interlocal Agreement with City of Grapevine for Parra Linda Estate Drainage Project. City of Southlake,Texas r City Council Agenda September 3, 1991 page two REGULAR AGENDA 6 . Public Forum. 7 . Consider: Ordinances, second reading. A. Ordinance No. 480-56, 2nd reading. 91-42) A zoning change request for 10 . cres out of the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract 19, Tracts 1B1, 1B2, and 1B3. Current zoning is " gricultural, with a request for "RE" Residenti state zoning district. Location: Northwest the first curve on North Peytonville Avenue, North F.M. 1709 . Owner: Robert S. Pollard, M.D. TOO Pu earinB Ordinance No. 541, 2nd reading. Approving the revised _ Budget for FY 90-91 and adopting the Annual Budget for FY 91-92 . Public Hearing. C Ordinance No. 5 2, 2nd reading. Adopting the Tax Rate for FY 91-92 . Public Hearin . 8. Con ider: Ordinances, first reading and related items . A. Ordinance No. 480-57, 1st reading. (ZA 91- zoning change request and concept plan ap for a 2 . 136 tract of land out of th . Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 50 , _ 2C. Cu zoning is "AG" Agricultural request is for t " Commercial-2 zoning district. Location: east corner ot--�Ldol Mill Avenue and F.M. Owner/Applicant: Bruce C. to M. son. Public Hearing. Resolution No. 91-42, request for Specific Use Permit for the sale of beer for off-premises consumption only. 1 . 1160 acres of land out of the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, being the southern portion of Tract 2C (proposed Block 1, Lot 1, Corner Addition) . Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a request for "C-2" Commercial-2 zoning district. Owner: Bruce and Neta Erickson. Applicant: Hady Aghili dba Southlake Food Mart. Public Hearing. City of Southlake,Texas • City Council Agenda September 3, 1991 page three C. Ordinance No. 480-58, 1st r ng. (ZA 91-51) A zoning change request for a 0.4.39�acre tract of land out of the C.M. Throop Survey, Aitract No. 1510, Tract 7A4B3 . Current zoning is.-I`kG" Agricultural, with a request for "I-1" Light I trial zoning district. Location: Northwest o he intersection of Sam School Road and West Dove Ro n French Circle. Owne plicant: Jim and Beth Futch. P c Hearing. 9. Consider: Resolutions A. Resolution No. 91-411 oving and authorizing the execution of a " ng Agent/Registrar Agreement" in relation t e "City of Southlake, Texas, Certificate of • ation, Series, 1991, " and resolving other ters incident and related thereto. 10 Other items for consideration. Award of b' inage improvements in Mission Hills n inental Park Subdivisions. B. Agreement with UTA to conduct SH 114 Corridor Study. 11. Other items for discussion: A. Sign ordinance. 12 . Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at city hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, August 30, 1991 at 5:00 p.m. , pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17 V.T.C.S. ,f,f J1 r Jof�,``` T NFL�•��''••. ZA 4 A� .. andra L. LeGrand ;o• City Secretary =�-• x •+a��ua►Nw City of Southlake,Texas EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION- Section 2(e) The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects . The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Ray L. Whitmore, Louis Messina and Marie J. Robinson v. City of Southlake, 1980. 2 . Russell Sivey v. City of Southlake, September 1989 . 3. Essig Claim, February 1991. 4 . Ginger Creek Estates, March 1991. 5. Margaret Freemen Claim, January 1990. 6 . West Beach Addition. 7 . Murawski Claim. 8. Garrett Claim. 9 . Ken Smith, July 1991. Litigation is, by nature, an on-going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasion, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects, in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. LAND ACQUISITION- Section 2 (f) The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisitions in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. PERSONNEL- Section 2(q) The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Board and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions are on file in the City Secretary' s Office. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this City Council Meeting, an executive session will be held. SLL 8/16/91 A I City of South lake,Texas a ' M E M O R A N D U M August 30, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest Regular City Council Meeting - 9/03/1991 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 . Concerning Agenda Format, remember that we will not be changing the beginning time until the first meeting in October due to previously scheduled notice requirements for public hearings. Concerning public hearings, you will note that on zoning items we have had public hearings on first and second readings of the ordinances . There is a requirement for a hearing before P&Z, and before City Council . Nothing in our Zoning Ordinance, our City Charter, or the Local Government Code requires two public hearings at City Council . You may want to consider scheduling public hearings only before the second reading as required by City Charter. Note that anyone can still address the City Council on first reading, given the provisions of the City Charter and the practice you have established. The City Charter in Section 2 . 11 requires the City Council to " . . .provide for citizen participation at any meeting with regard to any matter under consideration in accordance with rules and regulations as the Council may provide. " By practice, we have the sign-up sheet for people wishing to address the Council on a particular item. When the Mayor looks at the sign-up sheet, and no one has signed up, he can still inquire (as he regularly does) if anyone wishes to address the Council . On many matters this will be the case. We have stopped advertising public hearings on first readings of most other ordinances . This will save on costs of public notices in the official newspaper, and people still have the right to be heard. WHAT IS YOUR DIRECTION? 2 . Agenda Item No 1 . Executive Session. During this item Allen Taylor will brief you on the Boswell hearing in Austin last week, since it relates to the West Beach development. Hopefully, it will not take but about 15 minutes at most. } 3 . Agenda Item No. 5A. Interlocal Agreement with City of Grapevine for Parra Linda Drainage Improvements . Note that the agreement provides everything requested by Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest August 30, 1991 Page 2 City Council except a provision for Southlake' s future use if needed of the facility. However, we could in future request such use. I recommend we approve the agreement as submitted because ( 1) it will protect the City of Southlake from future damage claims which may arise due to runoff from the Southlake side of Kimball which is now getting into homes in Parra Linda, and just as importantly (2) Grapevine has assisted us with several agreements (sewer at Skaggs Shopping center; water at Bank Place, etc . ) that we needed. 4 . Agenda Item No 7B Second Reading of Ordinance No. 541, FY91-92 Budget. In your agenda packet find the adjustments made to the budget during the August 20 and August 27 work sessions . Please note that if approved, the $59,788 reserved for personnel adjustments (4% in January, 1991) set out on page 1 on third line and page 2 below the expenditure line will be incorporated into the departmental expenditures for final printing of budget document. 5. Agenda Item No 7C Ordinance No. 542 . Second reading on FY91-92 Tax Rate Ordinance. The truth in taxation notice provisions in state law require us to advertise in the official newspaper the time, date and place of the vote on the tax rate. The newspaper notice has the time at 9 :00 p.m. Given this, we need to wait until the published time of 9 :00 p.m. to have the public hearing. 6 . Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution 91-41 . This is the item tabled in the August 27 special meeting. 7 . Agenda Item No 10A Mission Hills and CPE drainage improvements bid award. This will enable us to complete the drainage improvements on the Thomas/Anderson property in CPE, according to our settlement agreement, and to make repairs to the drainage easement washout off San Juan in Mission Hills . 8 . Agenda item No 10B. SH114 Corridor Study. City Council will need to authorize the City to enter into an agreement with the University of Texas at Arlington at this time in order for the project to proceed, since the class begins September 3rd. The University will be providing 64% of the cost of the project. During the special session of the Texas Legislature, the funding for the Institute of Urban Studies was eliminated. The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest August 30, 1991 Page 3 University has not yet determined how this will directly impact the Institute' s existence. This will not affect the academic programs (which are in the School of Urban and Public Affairs) , but will effectively eliminate the community outreach program except for limited class projects, for at least two years . The Institute' s research and community service program was created by the Legislature in 1967 as a special line item in the total higher education appropriation. This year marked the first time it was singled out for elimination. Apparently, it was eliminated because of its visibility (as a special line item) . The merits of the Institute were not an issue. UTA will restructure programs around the School of Urban and Public Affairs . The name "Institute of Urban Studies" will probably be dropped, along with all but a very limited outreach program. This will not affect our SH114 Corridor Study, but it probably will not be available in the near future if we do not go forth at this time. The study as proposed will fit with the process of the staff and P&Z to update our master land use plan. 9 . Agenda Item No. 11A. Sign Ordinance. Following the discussion at this meeting, we will place this item on the September 17 agenda for consideration. Note Eddie Wilson' s memo in your packet. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 10 . Construction of S-2 Sewer Line. We are planning to bring to you on the first meeting in October, as a discussion item, the construction of the S-2 sewer line from the Big Bear Creek Interceptor to the Stone Myers and Albertson' s developments . The S-2 line is planned to serve Southlake and portions of Keller. It is anticipated that the cost of the line is to be shared by the Cities of Southlake and Keller, Keller I .S.D. , and Stone Myers and John Drew. The estimated costs listed below are for the total line and based upon a basin pro-rata share: City of Keller $ 180,000 Keller I .S.D. 100,000 Stone Meyers 127,258 John Drew (Albertson) 127,258 City of Southlake 219,358 $ 753,874 n Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest August 30, 1991 Page 4 However, there are a number of questions to be resolved before we are in position to consider the entire S-2 line. Although the City of Keller has purportedly set aside funds to do its portion, there is some question as to whether or not the Keller I .S.D. will be able to pay its share. If not, and we construct the total line, Keller I .S.D. will be able to connect with its only obligation being the normal fees plus the cost of extending to the S-2 line. This will increase our costs . Until this is resolved, we are only recommending the construction of that portion of the S-2 line to FM1709 . This will enable the Stone Meyers and Albertson developments to be served. The cost for the lower portion (to FM1709) of the S-2 line is estimated at $381,775 . This will be divided equally among the City, Stone Meyers, and John Drew at ($381,775/3) $127,258 . The City' s share of the S-2 cost would be paid out of sewer impact fees . These fees can only be used for improvements to the sewer system. We have been proceeding with an understanding that the sewer impact fees we have been collecting are to be reserved for the Denton Creek Pressure System, either for construction on portions of the line, or to pay for the bonded indebtness for several years until we add more customers . However, given the location of the S-2, we will in all likelihood recoup in additional impact fees the cost of the S-2 line. As you can see on the attached map, the lower S-2 line will provide sewer service along Davis Boulevard and portions of FM1709, including Jim Martin' s. 11. School Zones . We were notified late this week that the posted hours of the school zones need to be changed. The signs must be changed, and the ordinance must be amended. The current signs post a school zone for the hours of 2 : 30 p.m. - 3 :45 p.m. School now lets out at 3:45 p.m. , so the time needs to be extended. We did not have enough time to get this item on the September 3 Council Agenda. We plan to come before you on the September 17 meeting. We will order the signs by special order, so they will probably be up in a week to ten days . Meanwhile, we will pay careful attention to the school zones. Presence of a patrol car will slow people down, even though we may not be able to issue citations . Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest August 30, 1991 Page 5 12 . The Leukemia "Ride for Life" bicycle tour event this year raised $33,500 . The society indicates they plan to come back to Southlake in 1992 . 13 . Environmental Problems at 985 N. Carroll, the old Village Store. Tuesday, I became aware of a problem at this location which may ultimately involve a substantial cost to the City. Mr. Weldon McDavid is the current owner of the building. The building has two abandoned underground fuel storage tanks. Mr. McDavid came to my office and explained that he is being required to remove the tanks . Before removing the tanks, he must first dispose of the 10,000 gallons of water contained in the two tanks (one 4,OOO gallon; one 6,000 gallon tank) . The waste is contaminated under the Texas Water Commission regulations, and it must be removed and disposed of according to TWC regs, which means by a certified hazardous waste handler. The lowest quote Mr. McDavid has received is at 65(P per gallon. Mr. McDavid has demanded that the City pay the $6,500 cost of removing the water. Former Fire Chief Bob Steele filled the tanks with water prior to Mr. McDavid' s purchase of the property. Chief Steele used the tanker truck (it took several trips) to do so, using the volunteers . Apparently Chief Steele believed that the rules in effect at the time permitted this . In fact, filling the tanks with water did render them inert as a fire hazard, however, it did create the environmental hazard. The Water Commission rules went into effect in September, 1987; EPA rules December, 1988 . Bob had the tanks filled prior to then, we believe. Bob isn't sure of the date. (We are currently attempting to piece everything together. ) The problem is exacerbated by the fact that Bob formerly owned the property, and may have believed he was personally responsible for removing the hazard. It appears he was acting under color of his office. There are a number of hard questions which require answers, but we may or may not be responsible. There is a legal question as well as a moral question to be resolved. Once we have answers, we' ll let you know. Obviously, staff cannot commit removal . This will require Council action. CEH/kb UPPER PORTION OF S-2 SEWER LINE i (to be constructed later) r `= LOWER PORTION OF S-2 SEWER LINE (to be constructed with developer t: . participation) tw j f•+� f E!- _ .• �i•. :SIP i _ � - -l..v .l 'iw �•_ � =c _-.J-- t i N l • � M r '� I I r� R • t1' " ( 9 • _w•[•war . s .. . r� ! Y— t dy .QI 1 �"" I . t I•• 11 it •r•.a � i I , I.L1.1 n •• [� i li i i i s e { —i // J�• J 11 -- - . sr �• sr ESt . t' _ t.' •. ♦F ._ Y• �Yr t• i ..__-- ' r R.j.,PADEny at E. VES .� 1 ••sL M � _ —. W R G KERB y w . 1 w .-J us .7aLi +� L Ps®w ., L _•= p.p®RDAs �.vo-o© �. [.. •� y r I I I,rr�t =•. •.•r••r _ —1 , i, SWv[• fr W Y r • M t•t 1 i J P11L- ,•rr 1{•.. ,a� ' •u. K F 1'• u LAW arr ty Y,•r �•Mr If rr , �I I - W - wJ r• 1 L AY ' AIL i SAPS®A! Rla. ./ R� PA A`R� �3.1t.•oo l.�►aFI g City of Southlake September 3, 1991 Mayor: Gary F'ickes Sean Randall Mayor Pro Tem: Arvida-JMB Partners L.P. Richard W.Wilhelm 15303 Dallas Pkwy. , Ste. 590 Councilmembers: Dallas, Texas 75248 Barry K.Emerson Jerry Farrier Dear Sean: Sally Hall W.Ralph Evans Michael J.O'Brien In June of this year, Arvida requested the Council to consider reducing the width of SouthRidge Lake City Manager: Boulevard from four (4) lanes to two (2) . During the Curtis E.Hawk discussion and consideration of this subject, Arvida City secretary: agreed to pay to the City $100,000 for the Sandra L.LeGrand reconstruction of Peytonville Road between FM1709 and Raven Bend Court. The City has submitted its list of priority projects to the County. It is anticipated that some of the County' s projects will be underway shortly after (liiw October 1 . In order to insure this project on the County' s schedule for reconstruction, payment of the $100,000 is requested by October 1, 1991 . Please let me know if you have any questions . Sincerely, Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/kb cc: Mayor Fickes and Members of City Council Michael H. Barnes, Public Works Director (taw 667 North Carroll Avenue .Southlake, Texas 76092 (817)481-5581 • FAX(817)481-0036 "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 3, 1991 TO: Road Improvements Task Force FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting ------------------------------------------------------------- The next meeting of the Road Improvements Task Force will be held on September 101 1991, beginning at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. During the City Council meeting of August 20, 1991, the City Council officially selected Bob Dowdy and Cora Lee Brannon as Co-Chairpersons of the task force. The task force will be divided into four separate groups as follows: Street Funding Committee; Community Awareness Committee; Street Priority Committee; and Street Construction Committee. If you have not chosen a group, please be prepared to do so on the loth of September. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SLL/sl s City Of a Texas WORK SESSION JOINT MEETING CITY COUNCIL PARK BOARD 5400 Bransford Road SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 6:30 p.m. 1. Field Design Philosophy a. Multi Use Fields, Why? b. Single Use Fields, Why? c. City Park Master Plan Update 2. Pleasant Run Master Plan Review a. TU Electric Agreement Status b. Crown of Life Lutheran Church Parking Proposal 3. State Grant Update a. Mill Creek Status b. January Submission; Mill Creek or City Park 4. Staging of Project a. Pleasant Run Site b. City Park c. Mill Creek 5. Creative Playground Proposal 6. Future Available Park Land 7. Other Concerns Work Session: Consideration of Bond Issue Priorities for all Projects I certify that the above agenda was posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall on August 30, 1991, at 4:30 p.m. LaVada Johnson City Secretary P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 281-4044 btr- J-y1 lut 16;uo ti1 lT Ur XULM rmA nu, o1 i4o1c000 i . Uc r l L E FZ NOTICE OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KELLER Notice is hereby given of the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Keller, Texas on Tuesday, September 3, 1991 at 7:30 PM, at the Keller City Hall located at 158 South Main Street in Keller, Texas. The following items will be considered and will be the subject or subjects of said meeting. DINNER - 5 :30 KELLER LIBRARY MEETING ROOM City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission members will have dinner at 5: 30 PM at the Keller Library Meeting Room located at 640 Johnson Road in Keller , Texas. PRE-COUNCIL MEETING - 6:45 PM - 7:30 PM KELLER CITY HALL A. WORK SESSION ----------------------------------------------- -- 6 : 45 PM 1. Discuss and review agenda items . 2. Staff Directives. B. CITIZEN' S PRESENTATIONS ---------------------------------------- 7 : 15 PM 158 S. MAIN STREET•P.0. SOX 770•KELLER, TEXAS 76248•(817)431-1517 SEP- 3-91 TUE 13:06 CITY OF KELLER FAX NO. 8174319388 FI U3 City Council Agenda Page 2 of 3 Regular Meeting -- Tuesday, September 3, 1991 REGULAR MEETING 7:30 PM A. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER -------------------------- Mayor Wallace Perry B. INVOCATION C. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION D. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, August 20, 1991 . 2. Consider for approval the second reading of an ordinance amending Section 18-210 of the Keller Code of Ordinances to establish a school speed zone of 20 m.p.h. nn KQ11er.-Smithfield Road, Shady Grove and Sarah Brooks Drive, adjacent to Shady Grove Elementary. E. OLD BUSINESS -- NONE F. NEW BUSINESS i . PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the proposed Annual Operating Budget for FY 1991-92 . 2 . Appoint members to the Safe Access to Schools Task Force. 3 . Consider a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Board to establish a sub-committee to study funding alternatives and plans for a community athletic complex. SEP- 3-91 TUE 13:06 CITY OF KELLER FAX NO. 8174319388 P, 04 City Council Agenda Page 3 of 3 Regular Meeting -- Tuesday, September 3, 1991 F. NEW BUSINESS -- CONTINUED: 4. Consider authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Texas State Highway Department for temporary signalization at the intersections of [11 FM 1709 and Cindy Street and [2] FM 1709 and the Rufe Snow Extension. 5. Present and review a developer' s agreement for Stone Ridge - Phase I at Quail Valley Estates. 6 . Consider authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract With J.R. Kimball, Inc. , appraisers and consultants, for the appraisal of property along BB-26 for permanent and temporary drainage easements. 7 . Consider the approval of a contract with Staples , Foster and Hampton for legal services . 8. Executive Session G. ANNOUNCEMMqTS H. ADJOURN CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above notice is potted as per the Open Meetings Law, V.T.A. S. , Article 6252-17, on the official bulletin board at the Keller City Hall, 158 South Main, on Friday, August 30, 1991 at 5 : 00 PM. ghtiral St phens, Secretary ROANOKE ANIMAL SHELTER COMMITTEE WORK SHEET FINANCE: Municipal Support Gary ! ICKgS p Jinn C04F&r, Dpn D4VI S Corporate Support Marilyn Hye Fund Raisers Budget ADOPTIONS: Sally Bigley , Suzy Turner Pet Hotline and Events Janice Flynn Foster Home Program and Pet Therapy ` Shelter Staffing PUBLICITY: Gary Tomlin Civic Speaker Program Media Humane Education (Schools) SHELTER OPERATIONS: Paul Giles (HSNT) Building Maintenance Jean Decker Animal Care Bobbie Barnes Volunteer Staff COMMITTEE WORK SHEET (Cont. ) ADMINISTRATION: Wendi Paschal Membership Treasury - Controller Internal Accounting Budget Preparation PROFESSIONAL: Veterinary (DVM) Legal CPA r City of Southlake,Texas nff�� Y MANAGER MEMORANDUM August 29, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E. , Public Works Director SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with City of Grapevine - Parra Linda Drainage Project --------------------------------------------------- Attached is the referenced agreement submitted by Grapevine's City Attorney, Hutchinson, Price, Boyle & Brooks. As required by Council, an indemnification and "hold harmless" paragraph is included in the agreement. Southlake' s City Attorneys have read the agreement and agree with its contents . Please place this item on the Council ' s next agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. TO 1c attachment: Interlocal agreement w/City of Grapevine 5 .Q-� STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT IN1'ERI,OCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PARRA LINDA ESTATE DRAINAGE FACILITY This Interlocal Agreement for Construction, Maintenance and Operation of the Parra Linda Estate Drainage Facility (the "Agreement" ) is made and entered into by and between the City of Grapevine, Texas, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas ("Grapevine") , and the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas ( "Southlake") . WHEREAS, Grapevine and Southlake desire to enter into an interlocal agreement at the request of Grapevine to construct, maintain and operate the Parra Linda Estates Drainage Facility (the "Facility" ) as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes ; and WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32c) , Vernon' s Texas Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act") , provides authorization for municipalities to contract with one another for the performance of governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, Grapevine has need to control, maintain and operate the Facility which shall be located in part in Grapevine and in part in Southlake; and WHEREAS, Grapevine shall provide the Facility at its sole cost and expense; and WHEREAS, Southlake is willing to cooperate with Grapevine so long as Southlake is indemnified and held harmless as to certain liabilities ; and WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to both parties to enter into this Agreement . W I T N E S S E T H: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein, and the mutual benefits to each party, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Grapevine and Southlake hereby contract, covenant, warrant and agree as follows : I . ADOPTION OF PREAMBLE All of the matters stated in the preamble of this Agreement are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this Agreement as though fully set forth in their entirety herein. II . CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION 1 . Grapevine agrees to provide, construct, maintain and operate the Facility as shown on Exhibit "A" at its sole cost and expense, which shall include but not be limited to all costs and expenses for all easement and rights-of-way acquisition, and construction. 2 . Southlake shall bear no cost or expense for the construction, maintenance and operation of the Facility. III . RESPONSIBILITIES OF GRAPEVINE 1. Grapevine shall be responsible for restoring the following Southlake facilities to their original condition, if same are damaged by the construction, maintenance or operation of the Facility: a) streets and roads, b) draining facilities , c) utilities, and d) all other city facilities . IV. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 1 . Grapevine agrees to indemnify and hold Southlake harmless from any claim by any third party for damages arising from any claim resulting from the construction, maintenance and operation of this Facility. 2 . However, this indemnification and hold harmless provision contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any sovereign immunity allowed pursuant to Tex. Civ. Proc. & Rem. Code § 101. 001, et seg. , or otherwise. Agreement 0919v Page 2 5.1157-3 V. NOTICES Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been adequately given if deposited in the United States mail in an envelope with sufficient postage and properly addressed to the other party as follows : TO GRAPEVINE: TO SOUTHLAKE: City of Grapevine City of Southlake P.O. Box 95104 667 N. Carroll Avenue Grapevine, Texas 76051 Southlake, Texas 76092 Attention: City Manager Attention: City Manager A change of address may be made by either party upon the giving of ten (10) days prior written notice. VI . TERMINATION The parties may terminate this Agreement at any time by mutual written consent . VII . MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1 . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors, and assigns . 2 . This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof . 3 . No amendment, modification or alteration of the terms hereof shall be binding unless the same be in writing, dated subsequent to the date hereof and duly executed by the parties . 4 . This Agreement may _ be executed concurrently in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument . 5 . In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such Agreement 0919v Page 3 ��, invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 6 . The obligations and undertakings of each of the parties to this Agreement are and shall be performable in Tarrant County, Texas . 7. Each party hereto warrants that it has received authority from its governing body to enter into this Agreement . EXECUTED this the day of 1991. ATTEST: CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS By: City Secretary Mayor [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS By: City Secretary Mayor [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Agreement 0919v Page 4 T j 3 •-R a ,C ro R 1J 21 20\ IS \ S EQ� F 32 16< a � i tt� r It v) r 3 17E2.iis 5,ses _ so t1 . r le :3 : 17 a L! o� . o t. Y0 "• to / J 67.S�9D� t3_ t / nT.659.SA I• t0 t1 2 tT I, is I• I T 111 1 I. O L t` cl' D 1 10 ® IJ � N •F$I J6 ttn t3 It 11 to • e T e r Z.��e.6so o� O 17 II v. I' >- ( nlrr-CE CnEE t7 • to U 69,020 Ls t0 n7.6B, 24 !L L� / Is 16 IT le 10 LO LI L ro 4 S r, •6o,01tc A s , �E 2.11e. 77 13 12 I I 10 • • 14 N 46U 21 \ MA,;n VEP[)E TR tL 20 !s 1> N469-970 � E 2.1,7 860 tT to Ls Ls 1• s, I ss sz s� so t• to L� » rA1111 1_I9 A ISTATEIS 5B' 6 o SHADY A E I LIMIT OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SOUTHLAKE (LOCATED IN No SHADY LN-) N EXHIBIT A n N.T.S. City of Southlake,Texas M E M O R A N D U M August 26, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator f SUBJECT: ZA 91-42 Zoning Change Request ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change; 10.02 acres, B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract 519, Tracts 1B1, 1B2, 1B3 LOCATION: Northwest of the first curve on North Peytonville Avenue North of F.M. 1709. OWNER/APPLICANT: Robert S. Pollard, M.D. CURRENT ZONING: "AG", Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "RE", Residential Estate LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: 12 RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: August 8, 1991; Approved (7-0) COUNCIL ACTION: August 20, 1991; Approved (6-0-1) , First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-56. %94- KPG C ITY OF SOMB AKE APPLICATION FOR AM=h= TO ZONING NAP Application No. ZA To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must accompany this application. NAME OF APPLICAtiT: ADDRESS: �+ �iCAS �on C. DESCRIPTION (l1E,TES A. D BOLAS) OF PROPERTY REQL'E'.= TO BE REZONED: L J �O S�t'/ G(r u r c ✓ y-[�C 7 fit' J�� r�n Y t / ` /U 16 ZONING REQLT=: FRObI: G TO: !' �rQ2.gitltnt,�� C�G7�j This application must be accoaroanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of The property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. DATE SI TURF 0 PERSON FILLNG W-ST BE OWNER OF PROPERLY Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared Kober} r' NIA rd,rnD known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this q day of U 19 4m� A-�-4ju i ARY PUBLIC 01 AND-FOR TEXAS My Ca=ission expires the Jr day of 19 93 1 A-z fSAt. \\ ` SOWWII 30 It .�•2 IA' ua c ESTA po "ILL IS T' r licz 6e 7Y• :— r-i✓,.� �__yir- 691 I�- �y -- �.- i -`\ •�►/ :M49 2 2-9>1 SS :�� —? SURVEY •85T N41604 ---e-1 L / 293 I 292 i-�r -4 'V' -c 2M,'� 2 •,2e •4 ben U" uur-'Z!.TZ2r ►• 23 'zc ;z '20 zE ces 03 1 1_ _ >_ _ w•3 -Iar3♦ i �-� -f ,; �/"�� - 'a�C�— x; "ts— —� AEL[ER I SURVEY A/ NQ319 '>- a-9 >r( P_ _ 2l70 2C7C }' 3e �9 9 919 942 9AIA -F �6 i i ei _ 1• x�M J I I !•�yy 13y•e. :LR CPr 3CI �: 60 At. I .- •- -- c .3c to - �L a♦zA e.I I 9 _ �� . . . . so �• �s�s♦ze �-� � a__ Q • —7 2Ac9 tBAc. 19•e I 2 II IAe. -2� - - Ic—�'. '��. 6JIII��/�- 40 AC �1 [1: CI �i s sl se i I Io �8t a u' ag ¢ c Iig 2AeI �3, '�21 I OI! AC 3A 2 2 2 I 1� --- , --- - - 0 31 32 ._Ll_ '�� — 30 3 3 1° 1;� O� i ' i I O�AC. % �` 1 i iSS A• XACL All �Q2130 f'AiA 3E! 3C2 1 1 �•7 1 20 Ac ,3CZA r i `'2. 2A3 1 2A2 IK!` zo•e 37AC 20 i \ I 1 r ZE 2r 93 - 1 1 1'6th, 3A I . '�'4'.�U. IE ' ��§ [R.J. Pam®[EM 2F ZA4 SUav Y 485 N4300i sFI SURVE ASST. NO12SS 1 'N S H 2F� C i 6Ac---- 7C 2AI 1 p c 5c 30 AZ jE I �' — g2 3 - K� I �;-- { i G 3e L +4�lOR IC 122•c I :`i.�IA3•�•� I w•c ( 30•e 1.A. - TRACT LOCATION MAP 2A2 5A7: MU!!!pEY !7 eE 1 Ie3 I SURVEY ST.N21502 _/ 2A2 Tf --E IE74AC n•c r •C4 6C2 60A ] 9e9 Ac I I 1 iC 2.3 -_- ,�--_ 7- u7 ♦. 6R•, •.6F Is: Lie �e �s I6I 1e.♦ 7e6♦c ie I^ -.T - - ']P t Y 30 a rFN .J 6q 25 24 23 22 MB 20 TR 19 26 RO 16 a e i7 18 27 9 15 MEADOW GLEN ' 7 SF 1 Long, Joe Wood cock, SF 1 oL Eugene F i 0 0,y 28 14 13 12 11 I 29 er, George SF 1 SF 1 Stai?tz, / - Jens J° 6 SF 1 avis, Reese 5 aig fight, SF 1 E Burnet, Edwin S GLEN COVE 3 TR. 183 TR. 182 TR. 161 SF 1 3.34 AC 3.34 AC 3.34 AC SF 1 � i E MYERS MEADOW 2 O�JZ�'�" _ Farrier, 'C Residential P.U.D. Jerry Ply AG TR.2A1A .86 AC Sullivan J W JR Sou- TR. 18 60 AC ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING 7 PA M J CITY SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-56 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, A AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 0 THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 10 .02 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE B.J. FOSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 519, TRACTS 1B1, 1B2, AND 1B3 , AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONING DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise 7,9-s' producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: ?A• 16 -2- Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 10.02 acre tract of land out of the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519, Tracts 1B1, 1B2, and 1B3, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A, " attached hereto and incorporated herein. From "AG" Agricultural to "RE" Residential Estate Zoning District. Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas . All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. -3- ��-f Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be 1r► fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, og any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts . Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten ( 10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten ( 10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3. 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10 . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect form and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -4- 7,42-g APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: -5- ti t . ORDINANCE NO. 542 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FIXING AND LEVYING MUNICIPAL AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1992, AND FOR EACH YEAR THEREAFTER UNTIL OTHERWISE PROVIDED, AT THE RATE OF $0.4550 PER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) ASSESSED VALUE ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AS OF JANUARY 1, 1991, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT EXPENSES AND TO PROVIDE AN INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON ALL OUTSTANDING DEBTS OF THE CITY; DIRECTING THE ASSESSMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR DUE AND DELINQUENT DATES TOGETHER WITH PENALTIES AND INTEREST THEREON; PROVIDING FOR PLACE OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE TAX ROLLS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City") hereby finds that the tax for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City and the general improvements of the City and its property must be levied to provide the revenue requirements of the budget for the ensuing year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved, by a separate ordinance adopted on the 3rd day of September, 1991, the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992; and WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements concerning the levying and assessing of ad valorem taxes have been complied with. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That there is hereby levied and ordered to be assessed and collected for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992, and for each fiscal year thereafter until it be otherwise provided by and ordained on all taxable property, real, personal and mixed, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas, and not exempt from taxation by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, an ad valorem tax rate of $0.4550 for the general operations of the City on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of taxable property, and shall be apportioned and distributed as follows: 7 a. For the purpose of defraying the current expenses of the municipal government of the City, a tax of $0.31985 on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of all taxable property. b. For the purpose of creating a sinking fund to pay the interest and principal on all outstanding debt of the City, not otherwise provided for, a tax of $0.13515 on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of all taxable property, within the City which shall be applied to the payment of such interest and maturities of all outstanding debt. Section 3. That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on December 31, 1991, and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 1992. There shall be no discount for payment of taxes prior to said January 31, 1992. A delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by State law Section 33.01 of the Property Tax Code, to-wit: a penalty of six percent (6%) of the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is delinquent plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid prior to July 1st. of the year in which it becomes delinquent. Provided, however, a tax delinquent by July 1st. incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax without regard to the number of months the tax has been delinquent. A delinquent tax shall also accrue interest at a rate of one percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain delinquent on July 1, 1992, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of taxes, penalty and interest due; such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to contract with the City's attorney pursuant to Section 6.30 of the Property Tax Code. Section 4. Taxes are payable at the office of Tarrant County Tax Collector. The City shall have available all rights and remedies provided by law for the enforcement of the collection of taxes levied under this Ordinance. Section 5. That the tax rolls, as presented to the City Council, together with any supplement thereto, be, and the same are hereby approved. Section 6. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby expressly repealed and rescinded to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. Section 7. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance No. 542 -2- 7G'-a r Section 8. That the necessity of fixing and levying municipal ad valorem taxes of the City for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas, requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 19 ATTEST: Gary Fickes, Mayor Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED on second reading this day of 19 ATTEST: Gary Fickes, Mayor Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: Ordinance No. 542 -3 �� ORDINANCE NO. 541 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91; APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1991, AND TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 1992, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the y Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 1990-91 budget and submitted same to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City") has caused to be filed with the City Secretary a budget to cover all proposed expenditures of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992, (hereinafter referred to as the "Budget") ; and WHEREAS, the Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein *for all purposes, shows as definitely as possible each of the various projects for which appropriations are set up in the Budget, and the estimated amount of money carried in the Budget for each of such projects; and WHEREAS, the Budget has been filed with the City Secretary for at least thirty (30) days and available for inspection by any taxpayer; and WHEREAS, public notice of public hearings on the proposed annual budget, stating the dates, times, places and subject matter of said public hearings, was given as required by the Charter of the City of Southlake and the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, such public hearings were held on August 27, 1991 and September 3, 1991, prior approval of such dates being hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Council, and all those wishing to speak on the Budget were heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the Budget and listened to the comments of the taxpayers at the public hearings held therefor and has determined that the Budget attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. r Section 2. That the revised figures, prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 1990-91 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3. That the Budget attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget. Section 4. That the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy of the approved Budget, along with this Ordinance, with the City Secretary and in the office of the County Clerks of Denton and.Tarrant County, Texas, as required by State law. Section 5. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Section 6. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 19 Gary Fickes, Mayor Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED on second reading this day of 19 Gary Fickes, Mayor Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary Ordinance 541 -2- g-.a- 04 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: Ordinance No. 541 -3- 76- 3 � 9 CITY OF SOUTBLAKE, TEXAS 1991-92 PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 1990-91 REVISED ANNUAL BUDGET September 3, 1991 Includes adjustments made during August 20 and August 27 worksessions to the 1991-92 Proposed Budget presented August 6,1991 CITY OF SOUTHT ,AKE Page 1 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY Se Proposed 1991-92 Budget September 3 1991 p specut Revenue- General Debt Service Utility part,/ Fund Fund Fund Recreation Total Projected Revenues-Tax Rate S.455/$100 $3,683,831 $782,285 S2,524,034 $31,000 $7,021,150 Less: Projected Expenditures ($3,671,989) (S771,185) ($2,524,034) ($30,000) ($6,997,208) Less:Reserve Personnel ($59,788) $0 SO SO (S59,788) Add:Note Proceeds $107,775 $0 $0 $00 $107,775 Net Revenues $59,829 $11,100 $0 $1,000 $71,929 Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital K30/91 $633,195 $187,611 $268,000 $0 $1,088,806 Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital 9/30/92 $693,024 $198,711 $268,000 $1,000 $1,160,735 Revised 1990-91 Budget/Proposed 1991-92 Budget 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 EXPENDITURES Actual Budget Revised Proposed General Fund Personnel $1,581,075 $1,923,910 $1,939,901 $2,046,633 Operations 1,053,857 1,136,630 1,173,736 1,266,232 Capital Outlay 204,535 429,657 617,399 359,124 Debt Service 0 527,950 527950 0 Total $2,839,467 $4,018,147 $4,258,986 $3,671,989 Utility Fund Personnel $201,181 $289,605 $257,790 $293,455 Operations 607,501 1,140,046 1,220,500 1,871,710 Capital Outlay 35,727 266,175 266,150 110,000 Debt Service-Revenue Bonds 341,592 80,070 80,070 89,423 Reserve-Vacation Benefits 0 5,898 5,898 0 Transfer-Support Services 122,673 159,446 159,446 159,446 Total $1,308,674 $1,941,240 $1,989,854 $2,524,034 Debt Service Fund Operations $145,135 $0 $0 $771,185 Special Revenue- Parks/Recreation Fund Operations $0 $0 $0 $30,000 GRAND TOTAL $4,293,276 $5,959,387 $6,248,840 $6,997,208 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 2 GENERAL FUND REVISED 1990-91 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1991-92 BUDGET September 3 1991 99 11-92 1990-91 990- ( 51100 S Inc/ 1991-92 1999-90 1990-91 :9 1:-91 $Inc/ %Inc/ (Decr %Inc/ REVENUES Actual Budget RGyised ea ecr Pf0 ed.... Revised Ad Valorem Taxes $2,042,450 $2,447,441 2,......t $27,559 1.1% �lE 9G8,69S. ($506,30 -20.5% Sales Tax 396,106 370,000 ;;; 43QDQQ' 60,000 14.0°6 4'f ,00a 45,000 lOS% Franchise Fees 222 1 226,313 '>> >Z33 27,587 10.9% [ >>>> '>26 00 11600 4.6 % Fines 240,819 290 662 > > ZGO,.. .: 30 -11.8% >.. ... `;'''` 2S 000 9.696 ( 28S,OOQ Char far Services 34,159 56,491 ;:'::;::;fir .1 19 1 -54 896 <'2z»>13`:' 4,500 123% Charges ( 99 Permits/Fees 435,335 337,586 €> 7?k I 135,564 28.79b ( 68,65 -14.5% Miscellaneous 64,713 71,240 -135.6% -82 79G .7r10 (41,000) . (25, Transfer-UtilityFund 122 673 159 446 ? 134`44G` 0 0.0% 259`44fi 0 0.0% :........ to T ssfer-Iasaaaee Fund 0 0.0%.:::,.t_ '>><< 29450 29,450 100.0% Interest Income 51.141 37,000 13,000 26. _ 0.096 _ Total Revenues $3 609 730 $3 996 179 44 168 36' $172 057 4.196 S3 683 831 5484 405 -11.696 EXPENDITURES City Secretary $124,526 $115,315 5131,990 $169675 12.6% 51214I5. (S10,575) -8.0% ..........................:. City Manager 88,573 113,330 134,4z3' 17,093 13.1% 217,539 (12,884) -9.9% Support Services 296.51 353.035 552.13a 199.095 36.1% (142.610) -25.8% General Gov Total 509 618 581 680 814 43' 232 863 28.6% 648 4T4 166 069 -20.4% . ..:.. Finance 182,226 161,307 285,458: 24,151 13.0% ::;;:::.;::::253,953 8,495 4.6% Municipal Court 119.640 136359 f33216` 3143 -2.4% 138 55.187 3.9% Finance Total 301 866 97 666 18 674; 1 008 6.696 :<::: „:_<:5332.356 13 682 4.3% Fire 422,106 445,276 444,976 (300) -0.1% S47�I0 102,234 23.0% Police 923,906 810,011 795,452 (14,55 -1.8% 819,666: 24,214 3.0% Public Safety Support 0 269.530 :; Z70x98f 1.451 OS% ;.:;.;:.;:.;:.;;<;:301.730 36.749 13.6% Public Safety Total $1.346.012 $1,524,817 ;:.;1 511.404 13 408 -0.996 $163,197 10.8% Building Inspections 198,187 103,369 303,68E 317 03% 221M.; 17 894 173% ..... ...............:............. Planning and Zoning 0 95,705 a39M 44,210 31.6% _.....1S4S 20, -14.6%. ........................ ............................. Streets/Drainage 353,119 743,433 673,025 (70,408) -10.5% 590,448 (82,577) -123% Parks and Recreation 59,759 81,967 108,824 26,857 24.7% 89,780 (19,044) -175% Public Works Admin 61,482 61 60 600 60 60.9 -1.0% 6790 4170 -6.8% Public Works Total $672,547 $1.086.034 51;086 410 376 0.0% 978 053 108 357 -10.0eb Other 99424 0 _._.......... _..................:.... _.._............_ ............................ _........_-__.. ............................. _..... .._..... ...._................ Note Payable 0 0 0: 0 0.0% 3$,500 38,500 100.0% Debt Service G.O.Bonds 0 527.950 527.950 0 0.0% "0` 52( 7.950) -100.0% Total Expenditures $2 839 467 $4 018 147 :$4 258 9" $240 839 5.7% S3 671 989 (586,9971 -13.8% Net Revenues 770 63 1 968 7 68 7 511.842 Add:Proceeds from C.O.Sale $0 $0 5200,000 $200,000 $0 Add:Proceeds from Note 0 0 Q 0 I07,775 Lew Reserve-totra.tructtse 0 (3762M) >(376�8$ 0 0' Less:Rescue-vacation 0 (39,864) (39,864) 0 0 t.eas:Resaw-Personnel 0 0 0 0 597 Net Revenues S770263 438120 tZ66.9CQ $131,218 59 829' Beginning FundBalaoce $169,834 $940,097 �940,09? $O S633,195 Ending Fund Bala 5940.097 501 977633.Y95 S693.024 1131,218 Balance g CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 3 ' DEBT SERVICE FUND REVISED 1990-91 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1991-92 BUDGET September 3,199 1991-92 1990-91 1990-91 S Inc/ 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 $IncJ %IncJ • ; 9 ;� (Decr) 1991-92 REVENUES Actual Budget Revised >P)rQ ::` d< Revised %Inc/ Ad Valorem Taxes $171,779 $O SO s0 0.0% 7b►685 $769,685 100.0% Interest Income 34,982 0 0 0 0.0% 12.600 100.096 Total Reveaaea $206,761 $0 s0 $0 0.04A ; 'ISZ 83 $792= 100.096 EXPENDITURES Principal $ss,000 So So So 0.096 s 000 $M,000 100.096 Interest 88,909 0 0 0 0.096 336,806 100.096 Admin.Expenses 1,226 0 0 0 0.096 . '' ;St 1,500 100.096 Operating Transfer/ Water/Sewer Fund 0 0 0 0 0.0°6 <'. 22.......................... g 227.879 100.0% Total Expenditures $145,135 $0 $0 $0 0.0% .,,,,,,,, ........, S771,18s 100.0% Net Aeveouea 61 626 �0 £Q 10 0.0 11 100 1 00 Bepmin$Fund Man= $125,985 $197,611 $187,611 s0 0.0% ; 3187 FAdin6 Fund Baia m S187.611 87 6 S187.611 L -OOA ;` <? ; y j.9 j : CITY OF S O UTHLAKE Page 4 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND REVISED 1990-91 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1991-92 BUDGET September 3 1991 -199 1 92 1990-9 - 1 1990 91 >" ,65510 S Inc/ -92 1990-91 : ;1:9 :- 91 $Inc/ %Inc/ 99: 9 (Dax) %Inc/ . REVENUES Actual Budget Rt vlsed ecr ea Revised sed: Revised Ad Valorem Taxes $2,214,229 $2,447,441 Sz;475,044 $27,559 1.1% 7 $263,380 10.6% Sales Tax 396,106 370,000430;00.0..' 60,000 14.0% «><4?73D00; 45000 10.5% ........................ ►....... Franchise Fees 222,331 226,313 ; ' ' 253;9Q0 27,587 10.9% '.<> iZ63 .OQ 11600 4.6% ►5;:::: Fines 240,819 290,662 ; ;;; 60 Q06 30 662 -11.8% 25,000 9.6% Charges for Services 34,159 56,491 _.' . (19,991) -54 8% [ ' 41 4 0� 123% Permits/Fees 435,3M 337,586 ' <+33150 135,564 V0% 65 -14.5% - ... (� Miscellaneous 64713 71IJ 41 -135.6 - Transfer-UtilityFund 122,673 159,446 13:9`446 0 0.0% 15g446 0 0.0% Transfer-Issarawe F 0 0 <> <><>» 0 0.0% : > <;; 2945a; 29,450 100.0% Interest Income 86 7 123 3 .000 < ;>;<>; > d`OOQ 13.000 26.0% >' ''''' 12,600 Total Revenues $3 816 491 $3 996179 Z4'IG8 $172 057 4.1% S4 466 llt► $297 SSO 7.1% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $124,526 $115,315 131,990 $16,675 12.6% 5121,415; ($10,575) -8.0% City Manager 88,573 113,3W 130,423i 17,093 13.1% ?19,539; (12,884) -9.9% Support Services 296.51 353,035 ssz.l o 199,095 36.1% 14L 2,610) -25.8% General Gov Total $509,619 $591,680 814 43 $232,863 28.6% 648 474 166 069 -20.4% Finance 182,226 161,307 185}458 24,151 13.0% I93,953 8,495 4.6% Municipal Court 119.640 136359 133216 3143 -2.4% 338 403 55,187 3.9% Finance Total $301,866 $297,666 $21,008 6.6% $13,682 4.3% Fire 422,106 445,276 444,976 (300) -0.1% 4?M16 102,234 23.0% Police 923,906 810,011 T95,452: (14,559) 71.8% 819,666 24,214 3.0% .: Public Safety Support 0 269 30 Z7Ot981 11,451 0.5% 307730 36.749 13.6% Public Safety Total $1,346,012 $1,524,817 51311 409' 13 408 -0.9% 1 674 tiOG 163 197 10.8% Building Inspections 198,187 103,369 103,G86 317 03% 321 S$... 17,894 173% Planning and Zoning 0 95,705 ,33%91 i 44,210 31.6% I19,455? (20,460) -14.6% Streetsrainage 353,119 743,433 673 /D a025 (70,408) -10.5% 590,448 (82,577) -123% Parks and Recreation 59,759 81,967 .108,824: 26,857 24.7% 89,780i (19,044) -175% Public Works Admin 61.482 61,560 60,960 (600 -1.0% 6,790: 4170 -6.8% Public Worts Total $672,547 $1,086,034 1 086 410 376 0.0% 978 053 108 357 -10.0% Other 9,424 0 _.._...:.........O;i 0 0.0% 0` 0 0.0% Note Payable 0 0 0 0 0.0% 38,500 38,500 100.0% Debt Service G.O.Bonds 145,135 527.950 52?.950` 0 0.0% 771,185 243235 46.1% Total Expenditures $2 984 602 $4 018 147 S4 258 986 $240 839 5.7% ... $4 443174 194,198 4.3% .. Net Revenues 1831,889 1 968 68 7 522.94Z Add:Proceeds from C.O.Sate $0 $0 5200,000` S200,000 S0 Add:Proceeds from Note 0 0 0 0 107.775: t as Reserves-toEraatruenie 0 (376,288) (376, 0 Q Less I%eerve-vaotioa 0 (39,864) (39,864) 0 0: t.ew.Reserve-Personnel 0 0 0 0 59 7 <:::: - - Net Revenues $831,889 4 120 13 218 70 929 Beginning Fund Balance $295,819 $1,127,708 51.127.708 $0 $2a,806 Fading Fund Balance 1 127 708 689 588 SK0.806'. 131218 891?35 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 5 UTILITY FUND REVISED 1990-91 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1991-92 BUDGET September 3 199 1991-92 1990- 91 - 1 1990 9 ' ` $I nc/ $ 1989-90 1990-91 ;s #��9� :::9t Inc/ %Ind (Decr) 1991-92 REVENUES Actual Bud t :[ CVISC ecx <PIO``._ t" Revised %Inc/ Miscellaneous S45,668 S20,280 $0 0.096 SZ# $920 4.5% Interest Income 4,459 6,500 18,000 276.9% i .2 0 0.0% Water Sala-rcai lestial 1,245,676 1,494,386 0 0.0% <>>% .... 150 02 ,s 10.1% Water Sala—constemial 254,093 373,S96 ,5..... 0 0.0% �41 37,626 10.1% Sewer Sales 30,673 40,000 ':':.' ?> (t'. `.: 20 25 513% ..........s` Q�rS88J ? 28,389 46.9% Sanitation Saks 5,369 14,500 1�00 103% `:'::'.: 194 0 1,3 ,35 1522% Other utility charges 116.089 79.900 ? '> 48.793 61.1% ";:`< ': '::;::: 4 7 33% Total Revenues 51,702 027 02916Z$Z, 1YT 80 sa,818 4.4% '. 'fy5240 $406,054 19.296 EXPENSES Reeve-Vau aao Benefits $O SSso 0-096 Debt SwAce-Revenue Bonds 341,592 80,070 ;:'>»' )`(.J( 0 0.00A :> Water 844,409 1,424,643 >z'1480dQQ 55,957 3.9% 93 0 -63% :::: .2 Sewer 0 271,183 ;;;; 63830; 7,343 -2.7% 708 444,220 168.4 Sanitation 0 0. 0 0.096 T4,TIQ 179,710 100.096 TraodQ-SvppartS"C" 122.673 159,446 s9.44W 0 0.0% S4:d4G 0 0.096 Total Expenses S1.M.674 S1•941 240 51:9 $48,614 2596 SZ"S24•Q $534,190 26.8% Net ltsvenne 5393353 587.922 ''`' s` A CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 6 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Parks,/Recreation REVISED 1990-91 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1991-92 BUDGET September 3,199 <? 1991-92 1990-91 1990-91 s s Inc/ 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 $Inc/ %Inc/ .......i.............�........ (Decr) 1991 REVENUES Actual Budget Revised ea Q Revised %Inc/ Permits/Fees $0 $0 s0 $0 0.096 >`.`%':<'? OOQ s30,000 10096 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0�00 100% Total Revenues $0 $0 $0 s0 0.0'Xr *3LO $31,000 10096 EXPENDITURES Park Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0°G < > ': ;Ql $30,000 10096 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0.096 <':> #' 0 10096 Total Expenditures so so so $0 0.096 Maw ` oo` $30,000 10016 Ptet it..+oua. s0 $0 $0 s0 0.096 ; =1 tIQ $1,000 100.0'Xr . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 7 GENERAL FUND FY1991-92 PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AUGUST 6 PROPOSED BUDGET September 3,1991 Object Account Adjustment Department Department Code Description Amount Total REVENUES 110 Ad Valorem—Current(to$.455/$100) ($165,715) 305 Special Services Program(DARE) 1( 5,000) Total Adjustments—Revenues ($180,715) 1991-92 Proposed Budget(August 6) —Total Revenues $3,864,546 1991-92 Proposed Budget—Total Revenues Adjusted S3,683,831 EXPENDITURES City Secretary 111 Health/dental/life ($523) 840—at$9,383 252 Metroport Cities (2,300) 8127—cut$5,925 414 Supplies—Election (2,000) 510 Telephone (360) 552 Permanent Records Maint (2,000) 554 Awards (1,500) 830 Dues/License Renewal(KAB) (3,000) to be funded through recycling earnings 830 Dues/License Renewal(GRACE) 1,000 850 Tuition (1,475) 860 Travel (3,150) ($15,308) City Manager ill Health/dental/life (1,050) 8120—cut$2,720 510 Telephone (600) 850 Tuition (350) 860 Travel (720) ($2,720) Support Services 210 Legal Services (8,000) 840—add$40,360 510 Telephone(consolidated for General fund) 49,360 901 Office Equip&Furn(chairs for Council room) (11000) $40,360 Finance 111 Health/dental/life (1,400) 840—cut$1,700 510 Telephone (300) ($1,700) Municipal Court 111 Health/dental/life (1,050) 840—cut$1,650 510 Telephone (600) ($1,650) Fire Services 111 Health/dental/fife (3,850) 840—add$49,782 244 Mutual Aid Ambulance (700) 750 Equipment Maintenance 452 850 Tuition 450 850.01 Tuition Reimbursement (250) 860 Travel (1,265) 910 Communication Equipment 54,945 $49,782 800 Mhz radio total(78,375-23,430) CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 8 GENERAL FUND FY1991-92 PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AUGUST 6 PROPOSED BUDGET September 3,1991 EXPENDITURES Object Account Adjustment Department Department Code Description Amount Total Police Services 101 Regular Earnings(DARE grant—reduction) (10,000) 820—cut$20,7M 111 Health/dental/life (6,300) 827—cut$6,698 232 Crime Lab Analysis (500) 242 Animal Control Services 12,000 additional allocation to total$15,000 412 Computer Supplies (100) 443 Traffic Control Supplies (200) 448 Supplies—Investigation (200) 466 DARE Supplies (300) 467 Crime Prevention Supplies (300) 705 Fuel Maintenance (2,398) 850 Tuition (25) 860 Travel (555) 920 Field Equipment(delete 3 video cameras) (5,100) 930 Vehicles(delete 1 replacement) (13,000) Public Safety Support 101 Regular Earnings (7,210) 820—at$32,900 111 Health/dental/life (4,069) s27—cut$8,205 112 Workers Compensation (39) 114 FICA II—Medicare (105) 115 Retirement II (282) delay hire of Coordinator,reduce all health/dental/life 412 Computer Supplies (100) 510 Telephone (29,000) transferred to Support Services 850 Tuition (25) 860 Travel (275) ($41,105) Building Inspections 111 Health/dental/life (1,050) 820—cut$1,750 510 Telephone (200) 910 Communications Equipment(video camera) (500) ($1,750) Planning&Zoning 111 Health/dental/life (700) s2o—cut$i,000 510 Telephone (300) ($1,000) Streets & Drainage 111 Health/dental/life (2,985) 820—cut$152,985 996 Bridge Improvements (150,000) ($152,985) Parks&Recreation 111 Health/dental/hfe (350) 820—cut$350 905 Library Books (5,000) 827—cut$10,000 970 Building Improvements(renovation of (5,000) community bldg$25,000 to$20,000) ($10,350) Public Works Admin 111 Health/dental/life 135 820—cut$5,865 510 Telephone (6,000) ($5,865) • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Page 9 GENERAL FUND FY1991-92 PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AUGUST 6 PROPOSED BUDGET September 3,1991 EXPENDITURES Object Account Adjustment Department Department Code Description Amount Total OTHER Note Payable First year payment on three year note 38,500 $38,500 at 4%interest note total$107,775 to pay for 800 Mhz radio and MDrs Total Adjustments—Expenditures ($132,769) 1991-92 Proposed Budget(August 6) —Total Expenditures $3,804,758 1991-92 Proposed Bud-get—Total Expenditures Adjusted $3 671,989 RECAP: Net Expenditure Reductions 8/20 ($195,386) Net Expenditure Reductions 8/27 ($30,828) Note Payable Increase $38,500 Capital Increase—Radio Equipment $54,945 Total Adjustments—Expenditures ($132,769) STATE OF TEXAS ] COUNTY OF TARRANT ] WHEREAS, WE, BRUCE C. ERICKSON and wife NETA M. ERICKSON, are the sole owners of a tract of land situated in the W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500 , County of Tarrant, in the City of Southlake, according to the deed recorded in Volume F Page I Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road (a 50 ' ROW) , said point being the intersection of the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road and the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) (a 130 ' ROW) , said point being N 00° 04 ' 07" E, 103 .87 feet and S 89° 55 ' 53" E, 25 .00 feet from the centerline intersection of said roads; THENCE: N 000 04 ' 07" E, 618 . 56 feet along the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road to a point for corner; THENCE: N 79° 24 ' 07" E, 98 .53 feet to a point for corner; THENCE: S 15° 48 ' 53" E, 471 .88 feet to a point for corner in the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) ; THENCE: S 510 04 ' 37" W, 290 . 74 feet along the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 93 ,039 . 32 square feet or 2 . 136 acres of land. ga 3 'so apAt • 3KI 10 ---/� ��• � � mil � rW�— 10 ! � ^ \�:i am mwt t t T Ta lA GA /0 WeIc t 1 If Ac E 2 AL 72, ?..L i I ,?Ac yAe !1 aAc` I 40 At. Y {i • ZZ/1 ••Z I � ` i H ID 1�_ Ia alai I i 2A4 i],1 12 t '- {�.JOIaLSOM _ I 30 I 3 t ,; IC C C C G C C C C C •�i ,fly _ps _ �R x ! i IAIA 20Ac _ j t =1329 _� `t`�• I � 3A 03 VIE --�_ asl�E nest M:<: ABS .r3l300 013 I 30 , - J f ZA S r • st bsl 3 Sc IE U � sA. I _- •� SAZ b 2 SAI 6—T mil ;A♦ 4f1 I —L T � .�� f I G0It Z 2 AC _jl x_ { Ma Ac ` 10 Ac SCI i I � H. 1 1 5 - -- ' IAA 'o —^ I ISM 4L I I I I `\ _-� SAC •11. Z.c auc�aAAe — . uRVE y0.YSTn1�`_C`_ SURVEY ST.N also 2 GAI ./ i/z ' fE i I I I 2A2 •0; i V I ( I ; ' 1 Es, 1,T k iAC I SAC t?c Act I I Ae �— - iC 2. 1 I g 13 AC 4fI-GM a IN yIr/ 1/ 111111,161 OA r � 1 A. I N�r►J-' 7 _ I rJ I -1 j aa.e clk L- a z.c� I a.� e IM21 1 SIM - 4A � -- K£LLER CITY -- �2 Ae GUM,0VrVT/ 1. ��zr i � �ypRf' CLAY t_ Sao&. ! L gURVE111111�ABST.Na3•i "�-'---� °O A` I 1 I •, l ♦.Ac BIG -. ° L - - 2E ° ~f� PEON j i 1 SURVEY,Aa�T.N 533 (aw TRACT LOCATION MAP ; !I R , J . 3UHS " o _ SURVEY ABST M2640 �� iR88�379I 22ABeC 19.RSAC tr `. Cr ��• 1 2 3 TR 1 17.5 AC d � Stone, A C AG Campbell, Danny E 'M SFl Saun rs, 5 Harol i W TR 4 1.0 A AG Alie — Brown, 1p 18p Robert G TR 29 TR 2 3.346 AC Collins, 1.475 1 SFl 6 Ottis F SR Sutton, Joann AG AG OQ, Brown, David L 7 TR 2C 2.136 2 r` Southlake JV C3 Martin, James H ( � C3 -rR TR 2N 3P 2,A3 4.3 AC f� ya 15•�84 Albertsons, Inc. i So hlake, JV C 3 '� 3 �' I C3 ? L R Y ICE 2R� = L ,�•r -TR_ bp9N C zAt I 3 b 8 AL i.>,►,�r� 1 I ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING to —o I RIR p►s f - City of Southiake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 91-47 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 08/16/91 PROJECT NAME: CONCEPT PLAN - LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Eng. & Design Assoc. 842 Auburn 3548 Big Horn Trail Lewisville, Tx 75067 Plano, Texas 75075-1729 Phone: Phone: (214) 596-6767 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/29/91 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1. Label a 10 ' Level 'B' bufferyard along the east line. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by August 26, 1991. Any revisions should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x 11" reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Engineering & Design Association �A - lo i E e I •¢;T Til` f�ti. •-'�.CI.M.IiYty,� i t i Tel itfs;�� I w a..,. .: ,� •�1 / p � 1 �1 a ( � Ins� �i Y � t'y.��. \ •.a �'P� � F �Ni'` CA 0 � S � .•, �r e � . Y � r� L`• i S� f f= ;/ r�/sai+/ii'o� • .+ C.J to J;pw s -� \`. I I o =1 / �•�; S pis C M IA S :' �• q 3= '�!" AI�`�� szt a3ii g`R a °� yR a x | � �A � � � �� • , i { | �{} �- � � { • . tj // � . I m- , k.� [ �- , | IL , • - f Ifni � . I � | | � : �� . ■ � � � ! I ! § � ; ! i ■ 3 � � � � � . - . § 9 i \ _ ! . � B � %wi , , ' ! /A-9 � r P • i<Y • �� 6Gctc.Gar.Ics.d�'rCLM.Ertt� b•� � 7•� ZouW6:K.[7cUL•TJRE r ur.L. s. y sw ph � � P ��• � �•c_�t O Oci I ` �•'" 1r� �• fir' \ 1 �y i i •1 r._ E "� s�. • Lt G 3 � c it . ;�:F / c � •y i O � ' 1c C, r x � 1 � CP P 1 ►�r r L'r��ev.Y//�4�i/ ° � C ��rp.\�►i, 41 Ile eo�� i C o 1I i• �j `•��i ' '.fT i •rji'r�'f•• 10. cp s 77 4n�af* �: :M ; ./LP • 4 O y \ Me � Jac r Qi M ��e r 1 1 -K 1 � •1 YI V* City of South lake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 91-47 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 08/30/91 PROJECT NAME: CONCEPT PLAN - LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Eng. & Design Assoc. 842 Auburn 3548 Big Horn Trail Lewisville, Tx 75067 Plano, Texas 75075-1729 Phone: Phone: (214) 596-6767 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/30/91 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . * This submittal meets the requirements of our previous review. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Engineering & Design Association 1 1 ITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-57 N ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 2 . 136 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500, TRACT 2C, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "C-2" COMMERCIAL-2 ZONING DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 17V,/z -2- Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 2 . 136 acre tract of land out of the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2C, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A, " attached hereto and incorporated herein. From "AG" Agricultural District to "C-2" Commercial-2 District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. gR-/3 -3- Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts . Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten ( 10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten ( 10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3. 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect form and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: p CITY SECRETARY 0��`� -4- �- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: -5- s City of Southlake,Texas M E M O R A N D U M August 26, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-48 Specific Use Permit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the sale of beer for off-premise consumption only, 1.1160 acres, W.R. Eaves Survey, Abst. 500, being the southern portion of Tract 2C (proposed Block 1, Lot 1, Corner Addition) . LOCATION: Northeast corner of Randol Mill Avenue and F.M. 1709 OWNERS: Bruce and Neta Erickson APPLICANT: Hady Aghili dba Southlake Food Mart CURRENT ZONING: "AG", Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: 11C-21', Commercial-2 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential, No Industrial) NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: August 22, 1991; Approved (6-1) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated August 16, 1991 including all comments except the requirement for an eight-foot (81 ) screening fence along the East. Mrs. Brown did not want the fence. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff received the Revised Development Site Plan required for S.U.P. approval on Friday, August 30, 1991 and had insufficient time for a Second Plan Review Summary. dated August 30, 1991. KPG CITY OF SOUPH1 AKE APPLICATION FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT Application No. : ZA To be filed with the Zoning Administrator at City Hall, Southlake, Texas in time for proper notice of public hearing to be made and notices to be sent to property owners within 200 feet, fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A fee of $100.00 and a site plan must acccmpany this application. NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION (metes and bounds) OF PROPERTY REQUESTED TO BE CONSIDERED: PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION: AQ REQUEST FOR SPECIFFIC USE PERMIT IS AS FOLLOWS: Or e OFF -PrZ9-tt5ES The above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA OF FILING REQUEST (must be owner of the property): 1 a IF DATE: Jv L-y gB^2 w STATE OF TEXAS ] COUNTY OF TARRANT ) WHEREAS, WE, BRUCE C. ERICKSON and wife NETA M. ERICKSON, are the sole ,Iners of a tract of land situated in the W. R. EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. �b0 , County of Tarrant, in the City of Southlake, according to the deed recorded in Volume I Page , Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas,and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road (a 50' ROW) , said point being the intersection of the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road and the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (P.M. No. 1709) (a 130' ROW) , said point being N 00° 04 ' 07" E, 103 .87 feet and S 89° 55' 53' E, 25.00 feet from the centerline intersection of said roads; THENCE: N 00° 04 ' 07" E, 246 .14 feet along the East ROW line of Randol Mill Road to a point for corner; THENCE: N 51° 04 ' 37' E, 217.50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE: S 15° 48 ' 53" E, 208.00 feet to a point for corner in the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (P.M. No. 1709) ; THENCE: S 51° 04 ' 37" W, 290 .74 feet along the North ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 48 ,614.8 square feet or 1 . 1160 acres of land. 8 a-3 ft City of Southiake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 91-48 REVIEW NO: ONE DATE OF REVIEW: 08/16/91 PROJECT NAME: B.P. AND S.U.P. SITE PLAN - LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Bruce' & Neta Erickson Facilities Eng. & Design Assoc. 842 Auburn 3548 Big Horn Trail Lewisville, Tx 75067 Plano, Texas 75075-1729 Phone: Phone: (214) 596-6767 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/29/91 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1. Label a 10 ' level 'B' bufferyard along the east line. 2 . Show the future box culvert location under F.M. 1709 . 3. Show the water lines in F.M. 1709 per the enclosed mark-up. 4 . The 13 ' U.E. along Randol Mill should include drainage. 5. We recommend some type of concrete apron/flume from the driveway on Randol Mill down to the outflow of the box culvert. This would eliminate erosion problems from the driveway runoff. 6 . The note pertaining to the culvert under the drive on Randol Mill should correspond to the language on the drainage plan. (i.e. 6 ' x 4 ' and not 4 ' x 61 ) 7 . Zoning Ordinance Section 34 .4 (b) (Screening) requires an 8 ' fence along the East property line adjacent to the residential dwelling. It further requires a 3 .5 ' screen along the parking area North of the drive on Randol Mill Avenue. * There is a high probability that the 6" W.L. serving the 1" water service will be lowered with the construction of the M.B.C. under F.M. 1709 . The applicant may desire to service off the 6" W.L. in Randol Mill or the proposed 8" W.L. in F.M. 1709 to eliminate future interruption of service. * The applicant will be required to tie onto sanitary sewer when it becomes available in the future. We recommend they show a SS service line in place and plugged with this development. 8 a-4 ft City of Southiake,Texas * Prior to issuance of a building permit, construction plans must be approved showing the culverts, bar-ditch improvements and water line extensions. Also an escrow will have to be paid to cover the construction that will be postponed until the SDHPT completes the new box culvert under F.M. 1709 . * ' Pole signs shall be a maximum 20 ' high with sign open between 2 ' and 12 ' above grade. Maximum square footage shall be 100 sq. ft. All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. Proposed improvements within State R.O.W. will require SDHPT approval prior to issuance of a building permit. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by August 26, 1991. Any revisions should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8.5" x il" reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Engineering & Design Association S B-5 ' xr ' 3 � "'j:��s• � � ...mar iT T • ra�aur+u.+!rR�r.•sra.a a * � 1.aw..•crw+rra• �a•�!�� 0 � ' 4Y.•1•MKM Ja• '� r RR ••i � < / �tills, It ifi' till. ` fs • _ sit z d �} oIRSIF ,r �VW 1r I D �I ( i� t'i �;� •J r• y • - ,i i ± N Ft . Y1 r�= / • A x s •93y S • 1� ��1 y , .5 i .fit , t't � 5 . 5lJ illl E ig a i s tita �I• s 10 i� r i v. i� • 9c To i I IL Xe 0 _� j ► I i I } i t t Z J 7OF -74 3 W > Pin r. 8 a-7 fro City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 91-48 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 08/30/91 PROJECT NAME: B.P. AND S.U.P. SITE PLAN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Eng. & Design Assoc. 842 Auburn 3548 Big Horn Trail Lewisville, Tx 75067 Plano, Texas 75075-1729 Phone: Phone: (214) 596-6767 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/29/91 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . Zoning Ordinance Section 34 .4 (b) (Screening) requires an 8 ' fence along the East property line adjacent to the residential dwelling. It further requires a 3 .5 ' screen along the parking area North of the drive on Randol Mill Avenue. * Prior to issuance of a building permit, construction plans must be approved showing the culverts, bar-ditch improvements, water line extensions and water line relocations. An escrow will have to be paid to cover the construction that will be postponed until the SDHPT completes the new box culvert under F.M. 1709 . * Pole signs shall be a maximum 20 ' high with sign open between 2 ' and 12 ' above grade. Maximum square footage shall be 100 sq. ft. All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. Proposed improvements within State R.O.W. will require SDHPT approval prior to issuance of a building permit. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bruce & Neta Erickson Facilities Engineering & Design Association g �-q RESOLUTION NO.91-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION FOR THE LOCATION DESCRIBED AS A 1 . 1160 TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY, BEING THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF TRACT 2C OF THE PROPOSED BLOCK 1, LOT 1, CORNER ADDITION; ; AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, A Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Packaged Beer for off-premises consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 That a Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the Sale of Packaged Beer for off-premises consumption, on the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: SECTION II That this resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. g,a--/i r t Resolution No. 91-42 Specific Use Permit for Sale of Packaged Beer page two PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake,Texas t M E M O R A N D U M August 27, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 91-51 Zoning Change Request ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request; 0.439 acres, C.M. Throop Survey, Abst. No. 1510, Tract 7A453 LOCATION: Northwest of the intersection of Sam School Road and West Dove Road on French Circle OWNER/APPLICANT: Jim and Beth Futch CURRENT ZONING: "AG", Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "I-111, Light Industrial LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND INFO: This area was annexed into the City in October, 1987. NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7) RESPONSES: No written, one verbal: Bill Roper, 2420 French Circle, was in favor of the request. P & Z ACTION: August 22, 1991; Approved to DENY(7-0) the "I-11', Light Industrial request without prejudice. Although the Commission empathized with the applicants' situation, they did not feel that "I-1" was appropriate for the area. They suggested that when the owners had a prospective buyer that they prepare an "S-P-1" zoning request. STAFF COMMENTS: A three-fourths vote of the entire Council will be required to overturn the Commission's recommendation to deny the request. 1 vll� KPG OC - � CITY OF SOL'TTIIAKE APPLICATION FOR AMEMM= TO ZONING NAP Application No. zA gl-Sl To be filed with the City Secretary at City Hall, 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At the time of filing, the City Secretary will inform you of the public hearing dates for both Planning and Zoning and City Council. You must be represented at both of the public hearings. There is a $100.00 fee for zoning; it must acccmpany this application. NAME OF APPLICOM ADDFMS1 (11y) 919-43y�5 wr o /L 7' '7�0 / o� DESCRIPTION (1LE,TES ACID BOLM.S) OF PROPERTY REQUFSM TO BE REzagiD: V J jj ZONLN.G REQUEST: RM: 11trie I, JA uce, TO: This application must be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 200' of any part of the property to be rezoned. A plat map of the property showing the area requested for rezoning is to be attached to this application. 7-"I- 91 ; 5-1-?4 DATE PVESCN F LTG NLST BE 0MNER OF THE P PFR'I'Y Before me, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared . known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to be that he or she executed the Sarre for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this o?9 day of , 19 I 4r. PUBLIC Lv TE.YAS lfy Carmission expires the / l day of 19� bC'2 J HEXR7 ' T A-742 t_l W WI��S _Z 1 W 'A 6 7A-1086 O sn,. 6 __ ~3e -7 ,• j �� L� 2• D. DOUTH1T —_ 1 `SURVEY A -o lqd&a/ / 2. 243 .. v �..� �i• JAI 2" 27 Ac eM N Qit,0 k � l� N -1-1 / Tl S9 � �p00 �t •6~ ..c. 1 ISU E/ABST. N*ociS 's , jN 24I i. N \� ;URVEY ABST. N*N!W _ —\�— jl 33 �• 4A v -- 1C 1 - z�sz4G — ' �.z 3c - '--r re�\ 217sA• � 7.3 r 'w �bB8 74- �: in�il�R7 j' fi' p / 162I �., . �'^r :, 4 SURVEY ABST. N' n34 S V 63-Ac. 7 4Ac35 SAC 2 Ac �. --tll STES 1377 Ac ,03a • b N w .7 r�ZA2 si 4+s. 1�fR12A •'� 11M- is j7364c \ 360Ac- 2: K RC No 3080) _� g J6-4 44_ A l82y 1 I J I S4 74 wEST_ VE SIRE 82 \ SS ae t0 \\IO" lot 01_0 OFr-N GOv� ES1P \ .r I • - r AA R,7s �4 - - SURVEY ABST N! 620 If Y : `- 7 7 N�/f�'�—� - •R Y ABS. N 20D3 s I =SVA' yBST N 2 - Es •� a �( 2ai � I se-ac LPI�est 2. S4c i5 Ac _ - -- i \ GA. 2424 3 i � 10 4t - 'MOBI EST TEST: CI (�!�� J� �-' 3A: �l L R KS tP1E5 _ zo P �5 7. _ LEY 2G 7?�_7, J� / awl=, — �` LOCATION MAP �� - TRACT ,RVEY ABST N' 253 71 �� ^3 =�_ i i TR 7A5 TR 02 7.14 AC 4.98 AC TR 7A1 35.19 AG Widener. ington, Ramah JO Virginia Miller, TR 7A4B2 TR 7A4B4 LuJW 1) Etal G.39 AC AG.48 AC 7A481 Roper, jr4B7 eer, 5 ACBilly R Claudine AG TR A 12A2 TR.98 AC en .99 @ 7A483 CAmer TR TR 7A46F`ren , 7A ,03A.Ac Home 486 TR .54 1B2A BillyrR 7A48,0 7A4T8ss AC i @ TR 7A1A TR 7A2 i6 �s Cla AG 2.126 AC 6.58 AC TR i 7A4 Bail y, 1.21 AC Tom AG ' AG TR TR TR 1 7A 7A TR 1B2A1 488 489 7A4A 2 AC TR 7A4C .8 .8 1 AC AC AC '51 AC TR t 7A .36 A 18 EK 11 ��E i i7 qHA 00 1 7TR �2'B K V i6 10 LNcc 15 U 2 TR 2C 9 30 1 AC (taw ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING ' . 9 3 13 r G-4 2 _E � AREA-fCOMPANY:SURVEYING 102 W. TRAMMELL ST. EVERMAN, TEXAS 76140 REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYORS PHONE 293-5684 ,,. 22' ROAD E.ASE.ME.M'T S. 69•ZW E. i:...N." 20'E. oaa\a+u\t IcR \\.O'T' t �C, - Y Ij 4 L� 0CIA ° l+J - o 0 x � 0 •Q Q 0e s. as•oa'w. d I C*A PLAT SHOWING SURVEY AND FIELD NOTES FOR A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE C. M. THROOP SURVEY, ABS-1 NO. 1510, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY A PORTION OF A 7.0 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO HOMER FRENCH BY DEED OF RECORD IN VOLUME 6095, PAGE 15, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLUIS: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the South line of a 22.0 foot Goad easement, said • point being S. 890 - 34' E. 260.9 feet and S. 01 - 56' E. 117.0 feet from the Northwest corner of said 7.0 acre tract; THENCE S. 020 - 01' E. 218.5 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE S. 880 - 08' W. 87.15 feet to an iron pia in the East line of a 24.0 foot road easement recorded in Volume 6940, Page 482 and 486, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N. 010 - 56' W. along said East line 214.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE N. 440 - 20' E. 11.07 feet to an iron pin in the South line of said 22.0 foot road easement; THENCE S. 890 - 34' E. along said South line, 78.9 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.439 acres of land. 1'hi% I% In iertsl% that 1 have surve%ed the Amne de.cribed prope►fY and find huildinµ% %hulk within the hotuyk of said prnpeity. aryl no oF ��,�'t •• ,, encroachments thereon.except as shu%n. SCALE 1 1N. a ro0 TT. ................. � ••�,s � � �� s CIARENCE W.HARD r By 'C �'..p. . ..'1600.......... •� .r•2•TS O . . . . . IRON PINS PENCE O'.. Sit* sots o aRc STK. k 5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-58 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 0.439 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, TRACT 7A4B3, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the City of Southlake, Texas is a homerule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise Fe'- e producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: -2- Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 0.439 acre tract of land out of the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, Tract 7A4B3, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A, " attached hereto and incorporated herein. From "AG" Agricultural District to "I-1" Light Industrial District. Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Vc -3- Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten ( 10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten ( 10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3. 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect form and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the lst reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY �� 9 -4- APPROVED A5 TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: �c..�D -5- C� SB W, IBM IBM A.M. ELSIE -7 0.-j 31 FRANks 4A R FRX 48 4A: 7t 4Al 4B1 42: z BILLY JOE LB NELSON NE io R.P. ESTES Rage* 0.54 "I—lit. Zoning aDAVID RAMSEY CABIMTS9 0 u. D �!t ai 1cj 1,G1 Ry4rdv::c Q Ao Cd. Ul SIN 1 1-"1 Vacan+ 1 cd 11cl - 14, C2 Rom 0.90 Otoh. 0 7— .24 co I B C14 CJ ROBERT Mom Vacant Barfield VACANI! 0.51 A. Slam 1.0 A. -4 P. A2 F] Al 1200 11so 1150 -3 ---- ---- 151052 t 982 12 , EST DovE ROAD WEST DUNE ROAD La bo le C z Ln l RESOLUTION NO. 91-41 A RESOLUTION approving and authorizing the execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" in relation to the "City of Southlake, Texas , ✓ Certificates of Obligation, Series 1991" and resolving other matters incident and related thereto. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas has heretofore authorized the issuance of "City of Southlake, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 1991" , in the principal amount of $200, 000 (the "Securities" ) ; such securities to be issued in fully registered form only; and WHEREAS, in relation to the payment , registration, transfer and exchange of said Securities, the Paying Agent/Registrar selected therefor is Texas National Bank, Southlake, Texas ; and WHEREAS, a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" by and between the City and said Bank has been prepared and submitted to the City Council for approval and execution, such Agreement, setting forth the duties and responsibilities of the Paying Agent/Registrar for such Securities , being attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Resolution for all purposes ; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that such "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" should be approved and execution of the same for and on behalf of the City authorized; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS that the "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" by and between the City and Texas National Bank, Southlake, Texas relating to the above described Securities, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved as to form and content, and the Mayor and City Secretary of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such Agreement in substantially the same form and content herein approved for and on behalf of the City and as the act and deed of this Council . PASSED AND APPROVED, this September 3 , 1991 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS AT EST: ayor City Secretary (City Seal) s7s7s 9,9-! s EXHIBIT A PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of September 3, 1991 (this "Agreement") , by and between the City of Southlake, Texas (the "Issuer") , and Texas National Bank, Southlake, Texas, a banking association duly organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, (the "Bank") . RECITALS WHEREAS, the Issuer has duly authorized and provided for the issuance of its "City of Southlake, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 1991" (the "Securities") in the aggregate principal amount of $200, 000, such Securities to be issued in fully registered form only as to the payment of principal and interest thereon; and WHEREAS, the Securities are scheduled to be delivered to the initial purchasers thereof on or about September 12 , 1991; and WHEREAS, the Issuer has selected the Bank to serve as Paying Agent/Registrar in connection with the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on said Securities and with respect to the registration, transfer and exchange thereof by the registered owners thereof; and WHEREAS, the Bank has agreed to serve in such capacities for and on behalf of the Issuer and has full power and authority to perform and serve as Paying Agent/Registrar for the Securities; NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows : ARTICLE ONE APPOINTMENT OF BANK AS PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR Section 1. 01. Appointment . The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank to serve as Paying Agent with respect to the Securities, and, as Paying Agent for the Securities, the Bank shall be responsible for paying on behalf of the Issuer the principal, premium (if any) , and interest on the Securities as the same become due and payable to the registered owners thereof; all in accordance with this Agreement and the "Bond Resolution" (hereinafter defined) . lA`-z g The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank as Registrar with respect to the Securities and, as Registrar for the Securities, the Bank shall keep and maintain for and on behalf of the Issuer books and records as to the ownership of said Securities and with respect to the transfer and exchange thereof as provided herein and in the "Bond Resolution" . The Bank hereby accepts its appointment, and agrees to serve as the Paying Agent and Registrar for the Securities . Section 1. 02. Compensation. As compensation for the Bank' s services as Paying Agent/Registrar, the Issuer hereby agrees to pay the Bank the fees and amounts set forth in Annex A attached hereto for the first year of this Agreement and thereafter the fees and amounts set forth in the Bank' s current fee schedule then in effect for services as Paying Agent/Registrar for municipalities, which shall be supplied to the Issuer on or before 90 days prior to the close of the Fiscal Year of the Issuer, and shall be effective upon the first day of the following Fiscal Year . In addition, the Issuer agrees to reimburse the Bank upon its request for all reasonable expenses, disbursements and advances incurred or made by the Bank in accordance with any of the provisions hereof (including the reasonable compensation and the expenses and disbursements of its agents and counsel) . ARTICLE TWO DEFINITIONS Section 2 . 01. Definitions. For all purposes of this Agreement , except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires : "Acceleration Date" on any Security means the date on and after which the principal or any or all installments of interest, or both, are due and payable on any Security which has become accelerated pursuant to the terms of the Security. "Bank Office" means the principal offices of the Bank as indicated on page 12 hereof . The Bank will notify the Issuer in writing of any change in location of the Bank Office. 7R-3 -2- m "Bond Resolution" means the resolution, order, or ordinance of the governing body of the Issuer pursuant to which the Securities are issued, certified by the Secretary or any other officer of the Issuer and delivered to the Bank. "Fiscal Year" means the fiscal year of the Issuer, ending September 30th. "Holder" and "Security Holder" each means the Person in whose name a Security is registered in the Security Register . "Issuer Request" and " Issuer Order" means a written request or order signed in the name of the Issuer by the Mayor, City Secretary, City Manager or Finance Director, any one or more of said officials , and delivered to the Bank. "Legal Holiday" means a day on which the Bank is required or authorized to be closed. "Person" means any individual , corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint stock company, trust , unincorporated organization or government or any agency or political subdivision of a government . ,✓ "Predecessor Securities" of any particular Security means every previous Security evidencing all or a portion of the same obligation as that evidenced by such particular Security (and, for the purposes of this definition, any mutilated, lost, destroyed, or stolen Security for which a replacement Security has been registered and delivered in lieu thereof pursuant to Section 4 . 06 hereof and the Resolution) . "Redemption Date" when used with respect to any Bond to be redeemed means the date fixed for such redemption pursuant to the terms of the Bond Resolution. "Responsible Officer" when used with respect to the Bank means the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors , the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Cashier, any Assistant Cashier, any Trust Officer or Assistant Trust Officer, or any other officer of the Bank customarily performing functions similar to those performed by any of the above designated officers and also means, with respect -3- to a particular corporate trust matter, any other officer ,,,,, to whom such matter is referred because of his knowledge of and familiarity with the particular subject . "Security Register" means a register maintained by the Bank on behalf of the Issuer providing for the registration and transfers of Securities . "Stated Maturity" means the date specified in the Bond Resolution the principal of a Security is scheduled to be due and payable. Section 2 . 02 . Other Definitions . The terms "Bank, " "Issuer, " and "Securities (Security)" have the meanings assigned to them in the recital paragraphs of this Agreement . The term "Paying Agent/Registrar" refers to the Bank in the performance of the duties and functions of this Agreement . ARTICLE THREE PAYING AGENT Section 3 . 01. Duties of Paying Agent. As Paying Agent, the Bank shall, provided adequate collected funds have been provided to it for such purpose by or on behalf of the Issuer, pay on behalf of the Issuer the principal of each Security at its Stated Maturity, Redemption Date, or Acceleration Date, to the Holder upon surrender of the Security to the Bank at the Bank Office. As Paying Agent, the Bank shall, provided adequate collected funds have been provided to it for such purpose by or on behalf of the Issuer, pay on behalf of the Issuer the interest on each Security when due, by computing the amount of interest to be paid each Holder and making payment thereof to the Holders of the Securities (or their Predecessor Securities) on the Record Date. All payments of principal and/or interest on the Securities to the registered owners shall be accomplished ( 1) by the issuance of checks, payable to the registered owners, drawn on the fidicuary account provided in Section 5 .05 hereof , sent by United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, to the address appearing on the Security Register or (2) by such other method, acceptable to the Bank, requested in writing by the Holder at the Holder ' s risk and expense. C/,y -4- s Section 3 . 02 . Payment Dates . The Issuer hereby instructs the Bank to pay the principal of and interest on the Securities at the dates specified in the Bond Resolution. ARTICLE FOUR REGISTRAR Section 4 . 01. Security Register - Transfers and Exchanges. The Bank agrees to keep and maintain for and on behalf of the Issuer at the Bank Office books and records (herein sometimes referred to as the "Security Register") for recording the names and addresses of the Holders of the Securities, the transfer, exchange and replacement of the Securities and the payment of the principal of and - interest on the Securities to the Holders and containing such other information as may be reasonably required by the Issuer and subject to such reasonable regulations as the Issuer and Bank may prescribe. All transfers, exchanges and replacement of Securities shall be noted in the Security Register . Every Security surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, the signature on which has been guaranteed by an officer of a federal or state bank or a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, in form satisfactory to the Bank, duly executed by the Holder thereof or his agent duly authorized in writing . The Bank may request any supporting documentation it feels necessary to effect a re-registration, transfer or exchange of the Securities . To the extent possible and under reasonable circumstances, the Bank agrees that, in relation to an exchange or transfer of Securities, the exchange or transfer by the Holders thereof will be completed and new Securities delivered to the Holder or the assignee of the Holder in not more than three (3) business days after the receipt of the Securities to be cancelled in an exchange or transfer and the written instrument of transfer or request for exchange duly executed by the Holder, or his duly authorized agent, in form and manner satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar . -5- 4 .02 . Certificates . of printed Section adequate inventory The shall provide an exchanges thereof . The Issuer or will be facilitate transfers printed Securitiecare will to the inventory of P reasonable Securities that use and Securities in Bank covenants ending their such kept in safekeeping P Bank in maintaining the care maintained by the less than governments or be exercised which shall be not of other g is as registrar , or that safekeeping , which for debt securities by the for which it serves corporations wn securities . i maintained for its o Re ister . Form of Securit Section 4 .03 : the Security will maintain transfer and Registrar, payment, the Bank es, The Bank, as Registrar, registration, with the accordance to time. Register relating in from time of the Securities in effect such Security exchange practices and procedura�ed to maintain Bank has eneral P be obligate those which the g shall not The Bank any form other utilizes at the time . Register "a form or currently available and current Y in written form be maintained into written The Security Register f being converted form capable of in any other time. within a reasonable Holders - Section 4 .04 . List of Securit at any time requested by the Issuer a COPY of will provide the required fee, Bank ister . The Issuer may The upon payment of Reg Register the Issuer , in the Security in the Security provided contained contained for business, P information information to provide an also inspect the Bank is customarily the Bank written at any time the is allowed into reasonable time the in that listing or to convert up-to-date Of the form• or disclose the contents at the The Bank will not release other than a ployee Of the Register to officer or as otherwise Security of , an authorized order and prior to written request receipt of a court Order except upon t of a court of the Security Issuer , except law. Upon receipt the contents the Issuer required disclosure Of so that Of will notify the Issuer or disclosure the release or release Register , the e court order or such may contest the ister , the contents of the Security Reg 7 -6- Section 4 . 05 . Return of Cancelled Certificates . The Bank will , at such reasonable intervals as it determines, surrender to the Issuer, Securities in lieu of which or in exchange for which other Securities have been issued, or which have been paid. Section 4 . 06 . Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Securi- ties . The Issuer hereby instructs the Bank, subject to the provisions of Section 10 of the Bond Resolution, to deliver and issue Securities in exchange for or in lieu of mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Securities as long as the same does not result in an overissuance. In case any Security shall be mutilated, or destroyed, lost or stolen, the Bank may execute and deliver a replacement Security of like form and tenor, and in the same denomination and bearing a number not contemporaneously outstanding, in exchange and substitution for such mutilated Security, or in lieu of and in substitution for such destroyed, lost or stolen Security, only upon the approval of the Issuer and after (i) the filing by the Holder thereof with the Bank of evidence satisfactory to the Bank of the destruction, loss or theft of such Security, and of the authenticity of the ownership thereof and (ii) the furnishing to the Bank of indemnification in an amount satisfactory to hold the Issuer and the Bank harmless. All expenses and charges associated with such indemnity and with the preparation, execution and delivery of a replacement Security shall be borne by the Holder of the Security mutilated, or destroyed, lost or stolen. Section 4 . 07 . Transaction Information to Issuer . The Bank will, within a reasonable time after receipt of written request from the Issuer, furnish the Issuer information as to the Securities it has paid pursuant to Section 3 .01, Securities it has delivered upon the transfer or exchange of any Securities pursuant to Section 4 . 01 , and Securities it has delivered in exchange for or in lieu of mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Securities pursuant to Section 4 . 06 . ARTICLE FIVE THE BANK Section 5 . 01 . Duties of Bank. The Bank undertakes to perform the duties set forth herein and agrees to use reasonable care in the performance thereof . -7- Section 5 . 02 . Reliance on Documents, Etc. (a) The Bank may conclusively rely, as to the truth of the statements and correctness of the opinions expressed therein, on certificates or opinions furnished to the Bank. (b) The Bank shall not be liable for any error of judgment made in good faith by a Responsible Officer, unless it shall be proved that the Bank was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts . (c) No provisions of this Agreement shall require the Bank to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability for performance of any of its duties hereunder , or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if it shall have reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity satisfactory to it against such risks or liability is not assured to it . (d) The Bank may rely and shall be protected in acting or refraining from acting upon any resolution, certificate, statement , instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, direction, consent, order, bond, note, security, or other paper or document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties . Without limiting the generality of the foregoing statement, the Bank need not examine the ownership of any Securities, but is protected in acting upon receipt of Securities containing an endorsement or instruction of transfer or power of transfer which appears on its face to be signed by the Holder or an agent of the Holder. The Bank shall not be bound to make any investigation into the facts or matters stated in a resolution, certificate, statement , instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, direction, consent, order, bond, note, security, or other paper or document supplied by Issuer. (e) The Bank may consult with counsel, and the written advice of such counsel or any opinion of counsel shall be full and complete authorization and protection with respect to any action taken, suffered, or omitted by it hereunder in good faith and in reliance thereon. (f) The Bank may exercise any of the powers hereunder and perform any duties hereunder either directly or by or through agents or attorneys of the Bank. Section 5 . 03 . Recitals of Issuer. The recitals contained herein with respect to the Issuer and in the Securities shall be taken as the statements of the Issuer, and the Bank assumes no responsiblity for their correctness . FR-F -8- The Bank shall in no event be liable to the Issuer, any Holder or Holders of any Security, or any other Person for any amount due on any Security from its own funds . Section 5 . 04 . May Hold Securities . The Bank, in its individual or any other capacity, may become the owner or pledgee of Securities and may otherwise deal with the Issuer with the same rights it would have if it were not the Paying Agent/Registrar, or any other agent . Section 5 .05 . Moneys Held by Bank - Fiduciary Account/ Collateralization. A fiduciary account shall at all times be kept and maintained by the Bank for the receipt, safekeeping and disbursement of moneys received from the Issuer hereunder for the payment of the Securities, and money deposited to the credit of such account until paid to the Holders of the Securities shall be continuously collaterialized by securities or obligations which qualify and are eligible under both the laws of the State of Texas and the laws of the United States of America to secure and be pledged as collateral for fiduciary accounts to the extent such money is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Payments made from such trust account shall be made by check drawn on such trust account unless the owner of such Securities shall, at its own expense and risk, request such other medium of payment . The Bank shall be under no liability for interest on any money received by it hereunder . Subject to the applicable unclaimed property laws of the State of Texas, any money deposited with the Bank for the payment of the principal , premium (if any) , or interest on any Security and remaining unclaimed for four years after final maturity of the Security has become due and payable will be paid by the Bank to the Issuer , and the Holder of such Security shall thereafter look only to the Issuer for payment thereof, and all liability of the Bank with respect to such moneys shall thereupon cease . Section 5 . 06 . Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the Issuer agrees to indemnify the Bank for, and hold it harmless against, any loss, liability, or expense incurred without negligence or bad faith on its part, arising out of or in connection with its acceptance or administration of its duties hereunder , including the cost and expense against any claim or liability in connection with the exercise or performance of any of its powers or duties under this Agreement . -9- =a Section 5.07. Interpleader . The Issuer and the Bank agree that the Bank may seek adjudication of any adverse claim, demand, or controversy over its person as well as funds on deposit, in either a Federal or State District Court located in the State and County where either the Bank Office or the administrative offices of the Issuer is located, and agree that service of process by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the address referred to in Section 6 .03 , of this Agreement shall constitute adequate service. The Issuer and the Bank further agree that the Bank has the right to file a Bill of Interpleader in any court of competent jurisdiction to determine the rights of any Person claiming any interest herein. Section 5 .08 . DT Services . It is hereby represented and warranted that, in the event the Securities are otherwise qualified and accepted for "Depository Trust Company" services or equivalent depository trust services by other organizations, the Bank has the capability and, to the extent within its control , will comply with the "Operational Arrangements" , effective August 1, 1987, which establishes requirements for securities to be eligible for such type depository trust services, including, but not limited to, requirements for the timeliness of payments and funds availability, transfer turnaround time, and notification of redemptions and calls . ARTICLE SIX MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 6 . 01 . Amendment . This Agreement may be amended only by an agreement in writing signed by both of the parties hereto . Section 6 . 02 . Assiqnment . This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other . Section 6 .03 . Notices. Any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent, waiver, or other document provided or permitted hereby to be given or furnished to the Issuer or the Bank shall be mailed or delivered to the Issuer or the Bank, respectively, at the addresses shown on page 12 . -10- Section 6 . 04 . Effect of Headings . The Article and Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof . Section 6 .05 . Successors and Assigns . All covenants and agreements herein by the Issuer shall bind its successors and assigns, whether so expressed or not . Section 6 . 06 . Severability. In case any provision herein shall be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 6 . 07 . Benefits of Agreement . Nothing herein, express or implied, shall give to any Person, other than the parties hereto and their successors hereunder, any benefit or any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim hereunder . Section 6 . 08 . Entire Agreement . This Agreement and the Bond Resolution constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto relative to the Bank acting as Paying Agent/Registrar and if any conflict exists between this Agreement and the Bond Resolution, the Bond Resolution shall govern. Section 6 . 09 . Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section 6 . 10 . Termination. This Agreement will terminate (i) on the date of final payment of the principal of and interest on the Securities to the Holders thereof or ( ii) may be earlier terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice; provided, however, an early termination of this Agreement by either party shall not be effective until (a) a successor Paying Agent/Registrar has been appointed by the Issuer and such appointment accepted and (b) notice given to the Holders of the Securities of the appointment of a successor Paying Agent/Registrar . Furthermore, the Bank and Issuer mutually agree that the -11- 9 effective date of an early termination of this Agreement shall not occur at any time which would disrupt, delay or otherwise adversely affect the payment of the Securities. Upon an early termination of this Agreement, the Bank agrees to promptly transfer and deliver the Security Register (or a copy thereof) , together with other pertinent books and records relating to the Securities, to the successor Paying Agent/Registrar designated and appointed by the Issuer. The provisions of Section 1. 02 and of Article Five shall survive and remain in full force and effect following the termination of this Agreement . Section 6 . 11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Texas . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, Southlake, Texas BY Title: [SEAL] Attest : Address : P. O. Box 92840 Southlake, Texas 76092 Title: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY Mayor (CITY SEAL) Address : 667 N. Carroll Avenue Attest • Southlake, Texas 76092 City Secretary sIsas ��-13 -12- ' Citytf Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER August 29, 1991 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager. FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E. , Public Works Director SUBJECT: Award Contract for Drainage Improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates ------------------------------------------------------------- On Wednesday, August 14, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. , bids were opened and read aloud for the drainage improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates. The low bidder was Jeske Construction Company with a bid price of $16,131 for Continental Park Estates and $14,601.50 for Mission Hills. The bids as a whole were considerably higher than expected even though the low bidder was close to the estimated amount of $25,000 to $30,000. The Mission Hills project was approximately $5,000 higher than verbal quotes given to staff prior to advertising the project. Consequently, the staff, Cheatham & Associates, have looked at two alternatives of providing adequate drainage facilities besides what was bid. The first alternative was installing underground pipe facilities. The contractor (Jeske Construction Co. ) estimated a cost of $16,740 for a 10-foot inlet, 225 feet of 30" pipe and a concrete headwall . This was judged too expensive. The second alternative was to install a concrete flume from the street to the base of the existing wash out. The flume would be reduced to approximately 6 foot wide and 1 foot deep and approximately 210 feet long. Cheatham & Associates designed the flume and submitted it to the contractor for pricing. Since the cross section of the flume was the same as that of the flume for Continental Estates, the unit cost of the flume is already bid. The total cost for this alternate is estimated to be $12,400. This particular method would be the best alternative in staff's opinion because it would provide a concrete lined ditch for the section needed, whereas the original channel bid was designed for half grass and half concrete. The original plans for Mission Hills showed a 30" culvert under San Juan Drive and a natural earth channel from the culvert easterly to the lake. The original slopes of 5% and 15% have proven to be too steep to prevent erosion of the natural channel. Attached is a letter from Cheatham & Associates recommending that the revised concrete flume be installed in lieu of the original design. O"t Southlake,Texas Curtis E. Hawk August 29, 1991 Page 2 Staff concurs with Cheatham & Associates recommendation and recommends that the low bidder, Jeske Construction Company be awarded the contract for the Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates at a cost of $30,732.50 and that the Mission Hills project be constructed using the same cross section and unit price as that of the Continental Estates project. This change is within the contract allowable amount and agreeable with the contractor. Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me.. MHB/lc attachment: Cheatham & Associates letter bid tabulation 08/30/91 07:49 '08176409665 CHEATHA.M & ASSOC CITY OF SOUTHL&K _ 0002 _ - CB.EAn-LAM - - -AND :. ..._ _ ASSOCIATES August 30, 1991 DirQ&-= of Publid Works city of - 667 Nll Ave. gCrtb 1 Aim• 'T 76092 nra St,aa� I �Op41t:S. Mission'Hi 11 & C=ti n6lirtzi Park Estates Sob No. 0017207 . -•- _ _ Dear Mike: We have 'ted tbat.tbe 293W baidd x, Jes3�e 'caY, rm the subject- - � .�mmit to us a_prrice fora-ate= flume-frEh.tom skreet to tbB poi -of &scb=ge for the Kiwi=Hi n project. - Mter fee]. that a-cociebe-flme would_be bettps frcat a city e sta of , a�xl stiwld-provide a betty pirocttc?t: y The car,TJ-' orts price for the flume, based upon unit prices bid cn bath pro3ects is .$12,400.00. - We also asked the to provide a price � an enclosed-.systen, of..a.Cuxb inlet and a pipe to cagy. the water back to the point of . disdbarge with a type t 8! jai a on the end of the pipe. . me price for this is $16.,740-OO- AS yai are asnTdre, the bids were based i p m leaving the front.se&-k n of the _ so3 and flume in place, and.r ?ring t1_-P_..sectivn rbich had"-failed with _ cm=ete rip-rap. The law bid for this Was $14,601.50. one of 'these .a1,texatives will be sati sfactQry to both the city and theY owners'. if ycu have any gaestims, please give us a-•call. BMIe Cheatham,-P.E. - ENGINEERS•PLANNSRS•SURVEYORS -- A Subsidiary Fiz indDcsign,1ht- 1170 Corporate Drive /to x'3 Arag on,'rexas 76006 �p V Qn c71 A W N r rodom w cn o X (D 3 3 3 o= ro D � z n ro n ro a ro O Q - r. 2 rn ro Iro X n ro m - ' CD X Z to o c n o o n c- cr N o ...j } Z3rq o r a ro QO ro 1 n m x D a CD � a a� cm MID n N n to _ i :E O f9 a D r r Z s nEllT+ ={ a ro ro co Ll `o c r r -fi r TD C N o, m ,p .P N_ Z '� O N N p (� O O CD ro O C:) C;) Clrn O _ O �J N X N ^ l0 h 1 1 V QN r A Q NUlO �y CDUZ) N Ul al tr; co C) O N A O C) O C) Lk 0 0 O I 17� ro � QUl r •-� V Cn fl W CD p� W 01 r r m cn ro llU\ r t O O b o o O s O O r q n T x ci cn O A W Qi O N (n OnL o0o o c = D C C O N IO A A 1 rn U1 0 0 O O IO OCD (•n fr'I rn O O 0 z COr+Op x p cn NZO r cn W n O cjl O cn dJ Q3 N m � co V O O Q O V -I-X coV O C:) CD Ul O l0 � 4 O _ o O n N r r N f.Ti r V W O `x Ul n W o o o a cNn 'N� rn V N O CDO cn V O O cn N O r0 c+ W O O Gi O 0 0 I 0 o r o O O 0 0 0 0 0 p � T C r c M 0 p 0 0 0 0 O rn� W X cnC n N L.a ro . N �-+ .p v ✓ � Q W N N �Cn_ V co O Q O cn O C) p C 0 0 O O O I i p o rn(cn A w N ti+ I o O m. mz � zn m m c Z -i ,-r z -� Z � < < m < < _ n � ED rD �, I(D r Z i 2 y ` m P. N C7 n D o NIt z G C) o Z ion a N z O z c � rp 0 ° m n 0 co H o CD D n M ID m Q N D co -1 p r ' tz cn Zl Z �o7 o n �° CD CD o =nx0 N XCT N 'A l0 c+ w n co O• O r v O V N 1 N l0 O � N C71 O O O W Z � �a,h cn cn � � �� • CD m � — 0 o p o 0 a n W N r N C3, n ( X L A o w N Q Np © CA co N M W N rn I D { p V (T O C71 O p --� o� o o rq U 0 0 0 ro m 3 -I ' m p1 N N �• � N a -' p O o w io o �r x v, z a o o 3 o Q t7lZ N -a cn� Q co V N C.TI � VI CT V Vf O p'I a1 ai co w r O m r e- w cn cti +� CD O iA N O N b CD O O ~ p O O C5 O O O C� T N O. %U W n cl O CSt C77 m,..I W Cn CA O /� O O O O O X U �I N -1 Cr S W X < A n N V M 0 O CT a.CD W N r N W W CD m N A Obi Ui CD p -{ p o n C) O Ip to 0 /0�9-s b rn cn .� w N r n �� c o o J J o x r0 m ro rD -t g n 3 0 G n 3 c a n n G. n o o o o —I r0 n z < m < < m c � < N G rD M rD 0. (D (D f1+D iC+J X n rD rn CD C7 Q - o Z m y ;ap D i O cv r r ax y CrQ, N rD n rr-- CD QQ rD < rD rZ1 _ C Z —{ O ry C 7D O G n �' cD •. r n Q ? r0 Z(D A 3 O o �cu rm r n LA 2. r D •s n z Q N • rD o Sr Z Z Q rr Q. m rD N m m r cn m N � Z -Y0 . n � D irD 3 c+ J m N 'T7 N �7 •.{ < CD m O � r ' ['t U1 / o � o h • -uC co �-nrvJ i, cn o, O O O \ n o mI rt.z co r N F-• V `' W X N O Q O 1 O O O ►+ O CDO O I O O O O O '0 q T Z C r+ et r w V O N q (� J -C. '�_ S Cti c� CDO O O m 1 i� O �G 2- CO —I T 3 O N A V x w O co to r V cam+ � N Q co a] N Q a)�O 0)CD C) rn d o 0 000 m mn cn . � X C co O O IE O O C7 m I 00 z ttoo XO C+ Q C) V V N C m �.+ ►+ W Ol O Ol n U ? N A 8 V �o �U/� ? O 0 _ CTT Cn IA CD O A ^, N 1:1 O O cm) O O N (.� c p ems+ I _Z tG � O �O r✓ ^ to >; ` •..{ N O G7 X O O O O O m I C+XV" Rl Q1 Qi t0 CTl O V N O O A —{ r rD o 0 o O n 07 V Cl CT7 I? W N F- • ro °C O O X X z (D ((D -�+. O m x Z O m 0 3 w 3 = n Z cr w w 0 c o nw > m r G < Z ID < .s < _ �_ z Cu w T z M E Mw y ° N M ° 2 z c ro n- O w o SA O D e* 7 7 O O V) ,..� G > fD Vf fnA N eN-• Z r CL t �t 1 CA = o 2. 7c' 7 O O V1 Z CD 0 N = rr O fl ry� )c- p 0 0 o J �_ Z fn N n 7 z w m + �^ :3 c m D � U aj Ul v rn p Z C\ a _Z C Pi el—x r S rn o c n w --(w -s ? r A 0 x N 0 (71 0 rQ In V N Ol rh Q O O CD -A Ul CT Q O O O a � � O -+l Cn S \ham v ;�W3 �T� N Cm �c � � � --�'� O NLl O CD m p �M�C Q Q CDO O O • E co n co 'a-nS xwo cw wrna rncNi to VA O C+ NOm a O cn r 41 U O co N "� F+�c O M D O o Nd cn oo O w m m m 0 0 0 co �-C� .- N Z V o cn X m w an m O 000 O O O OOO O O [n �x CO x Q]C+ d W C%-S m V V N C N GI N 1-• CT N W W V �--+ 00 Q1 f'1 Q N e•' N Ol 00 -1 ° W 00 w N d A U'1 ? CTl �t N SN l0 W m m O N W O cn O �l O b O d 0 0 O 0 0 O n m oDwt' rnrn oa N Z ` c� Cl o o W N n — Z 0 0 0 0 o p p o m� o 14 A4 Cn N (� V Cn!? lD ♦♦°� X CD�- -- F. W N w co 0 G� Cn O Q1 V! V (!1 p w. A ? O 6 O O O O/4 0 0 O Q IC 0 A' 7 < an ri �co o cD ro ro CD -S o ro c O a) Z < o oo �0 o 0- � c ` --i � CD r., (D <m ro <m m coa m � c* c* a O n ro cv CD en a -Z ro T x c� ro r c ro c o n ril I W u J ro s w 0o v c � w m 0 � 3 SP CD D"� c, M z (n = y a w Z O C D n o s o ;z ram- rn N Q r .. d � ro n 3 n •{ CD -1 n � cn CD n O O N z ro ro o fi � Z Z Q� (D Mm • n �* D m _ n-+ N D 3 C� ^� > > m P, ro ° ro D -n cn „ � • Co cD � r ' Ln ? O Z b -n•va C71 WCn•� z \ O G S Ow 0o m X co N 5 . j C� Ql 1l CT Gl N :3 N A c+ V OCD O O - � z mZ � � n O o coiD«, mM o Y z cn m m q 0 o I 5 C- o -i mm ;Q = azin mm c_ D 0 v� n � El El A+ _ a � n z A e� w w 0 a o c, cu a (Tj LD (D R. (D to m m '-. o x s i z o n a n D o a u o C7 !D rn m 0- N O Q '" r a � G o o ' cZn D fD CDN _ Q° w T o z (A alW cI N -s rD O rr G1 (n `-t t 2 .D 0 o m rD (il �n o n m w CD r� cD rD m Q N D N W tD O1 Y N D m III np ► p Z C CO -n'D V 01 c O O � O O I Ix to Ch Y ?[L7 w C� N �f? N N o X N a' cn V O CD �O ? O ZD �A O 4 -r.0 rt V Sc_ fA m � Q C� N mm 1'1 m rn N ID -{ � z x a � m o � � o � z rn-� m 0 0 / A-9 T� ,.<t° sT,,�, Environmental Institute for Technology Transfer The University of Texas at Arlington Box 19050 - Arlington, Texas 76019-0050 Metro (817) 273-2300 July 23, 1991 Mr. Curtis Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: It was a pleasure having lunch with you the other day, and discovering that our interests in a project appear to be compatible. Here is a proposal for you, as requested; if you have any changes or additions please let me know, as this proposal is changeable. My fall class, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site Planning, " would be made available to develop several alternative future land use patterns for the area surrounding Highway 114 in Southlake. The following tasks would be completed by the class: 1. Collect and map data on slopes, soil types, tree coverage, floodplains and wetlands, proximity to roads, proximity to water and/or sewer lines, existing nearby land uses, existing zoning, and other factors as needed, for all vacant land in the corridor. 2 . Meet with city officials, area landowners (Mobil, for example) and community leaders to obtain guidance regarding what their goals and objectives are for the area. 3 . Combine this information with the other data to produce maps of areas that are best suited for various types of future land use. This will be done using the ALLOT computer model, which is explained at the end of this list. 4. Forecasts of demand for various land uses in the Highway 114 corridor will then be developed. The class will then use the model to produce at least two alternative future "optimal" land use patterns for the area. These maps can then be used by the city as a basis for planning, zoning, and subdivision approval. The ALLOT model uses a simple geographic database plus information on community goals to analyze the area under (law study. Once it is installed, it is easy to run and requires An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer only an IBM personal computer. The model allows rapid mapping of items important to each community, and can produce a wide variety of alternative future land use patterns from which local officials may select. It was first developed for the Richland-Chambers Lake area near Corsicana, and was used successfully there to plan land uses and site landfills. Since then, the model has been presented at conferences throughout the world. It is now being copyrighted in preparation for widespread marketing to cities, counties and states. Before this takes place, we would like to apply it in several Metroplex locations, hopefully including Southlake. A recent IUS graduate and I have developed, perfected, written about, and presented papers at meetings on this model for the past two years. He has a graduate degree in City and Regional Planning, and is willing to handle the technical aspects of applying the software to Southlake as well as being available to complete any general planning tasks that you may wish to have done. Perhaps combining an internship position with this project could keep the project cost low while also providing manpower for planning activities. This option is addressed on the attached cost sheet. In any case, this appears to be an opportunity for Southlake to utilize the class to complete a planning project at a much lower cost than that of a consulting firm--and with the involvement of atop-notch team of experts, of course! Additionally, the city would benefit from having access to a state-of-the-art planning approach before it is widely distributed. The class would benefit from having a "real world" example to work on, and UTA would benefit by completing another successful application of our planning methodology and by providing service to you (as you know, this is one of SUPA's primary missions) . The class begins the last week of August and ends in early December; therefore, I anticipate that meetings with community leaders would take place in September; data colection and entry would be completed in October; planning and data analysis would be done in November, and a draft report would be submitted at the end of that month. Please let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible, so the class can "hit the ground running" in August. I hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, Elise M. Bright, Ph.D. Assistant Professor AV/3-a COST ESTIMATE Cost of the project will vary with the size of the area included in the study boundaries, and the number and quality of maps and reports produced. The MAXIMUM cost is given below. Please note that the items listed under "UTA share" are costs absorbed by the university; they are, therefore, free from your point of view. TOTAL SOUTHLARE UTA SHARE Salary: Professional $8,300 $3,000 $5,300 Secretarial 500 ----- 500 Student 150 ----- 150 Operations/Maintenance: Copying/Printing 800 800 ----- Supplies/Computer Time 800 200 600 Travel/Utilities/Misc. 500 ----- 500 LS: $11,050 $4,000 $7,050 SENT BY:Inst. of Urban Studies 8-13-91 ; 9:39AN ► U. T. Arlington-4 3 Proposed Dr aft Work Plan for the City of Southlake Texas: Highway 114 Corridor Study Dr. Bright's fall graduate-level class in City and Regional Planning, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site, Planninq, " will complete the following tasks, under the guidance of Dr. Bright and her research associate, Mr. Naz4m. I. Suitability Analysis All vacant land in the corridor will be analyzed to ensure that recommended development will be compatible with the natural features of the area and will also be located so as to minimize (W city expenses for infrastructure. Key elements to consider: tree coverage lakes and wetlands flood plains slopes soil types visual quality and aesthetic appeal existing zoning (including the airport overlay zone) availability of water and sewer location and type of access particularly at compatibility with existing land uses, p Y the corridor's edge and the area near the IBM complex II. Development of Alternative ruturss * Results of Task I will be combined with the city's goals and objectives for the area and with estimates of demand for various kinds of development. * Alternative visions and fresh ideas will be actively solicited, then evaluated for their economic feasibility. * A range of demand forecasts will be developed after consideration of such factors Dale at overgrowth the influence Alliance Airport, the city's g , trends. * The issue of whether to concentrate or disperse office, retail, and related uses it also so be addressed. SENT BY:Inst. of Urban Studies 8-13-91 : 9:40AM U. T. Arlington-► 4 (610" III. implementation After Steps I and II are completed, more specific ideas may be developed which will allow the city to achieve the visions developed earlier. Theme may include: e Ways to integrate urban design and aesthetics throughout the corridor via uniform signage, color, landscaping, structural items (for example, landmark structures or street lights) , and use of pocket parks. * Ways► to achieve compatibility with the visual and aesthetic quality of the IBM complex (present and planned) * Recommendations for buffering -- methods and criteria. * Designs for the ISO-acre commercial tract to the southeast. * Recommendations for highway access and curbage. * Review of existing sign and landscape ordinances to ensure that they will achieve desired results. A selection of items from the above list will be made later in the semester, based on available class time, student interests, and city priorities. Selection will be necessary because it is impossible to complete all the tasks needed for implementation with the resources of a single class; however, completion of one or two items should be feasible at this time. Those tasks which remain could possibly be completed by other classes as a separate project. /Q�-s SENT BY:Inst. of Urban Studies 8-13-91 ; 9:40AM U. T. Arlington-+ ;# 5 3 End Products End products of this project will include a written report, summary and maps and other graphics as needed to visually depict the project's results. Black-and-white graphics will be delivered in reproducible form, as will the text of the report. Project personnel will be available to make one presentation to whatever group the city chooses when the work is completed. Time schedule Septembers City officials visit with the class. Research associate begins work on database. Class and city develop goals and objectives for the area. Meetings with any other appropriate group (residents, Mobil, IBM?) should be held at this time. Octobers Data collection and mapping for Task I begins. Data entry begins. Goals and objectives are converted to numerical weights. November: Data is analyzed using ALLOT model. Alternative forecasts of demand for various land use types are developed. Alternative futures are developed, based on all previous tasks. Preliminary results reviewed with city. December: Production of all maps and reports for Tasks 1 t ' 4 s completed. and II i Personnel are available for presentation. Work on Task III begins after selection of specifics by city and UTA staff. Springt Task III items selected by city and UTA officials are completed and presented. (W AD 7 City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGER M E M O R A N D U M August 29, 1991 TO: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works FROM: Eddie Wilson, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Revisions for Proposed Sign Ordinance ----------------------------------------------------------- In an effort to compile a more workable sign ordinance, staff has made some significant changes from Ordinance No. 350. A primary change was made in the format of the ordinance. Staff has reduced the size of the sign ordinance from forty-five (45) pages (not including amendments) to eighteen ( 18) pages. In addition to format changes, the substance of the ordinance was changed to allow for certain types of signs previously not permitted. In most cases, the maximum allowable areas and heights for signs have been retained. All references to Ordinance No. 350 are hereafter labeled as 435011 . A summary of these changes is as follows: 1 . An index was added to provide for quick reference. 2 . The section on definitions was divided into two parts; "general" and "type of signs" . 3 . Section 4 - A fee of $150 .00 was established for signs more than 150 square feet. 4 . Section 9 - This section was expanded to provide an enforcement tool to ensure that all signs are permitted. 5 . Section 10 - This section was expanded to prevent signs from accumulating illegally throughout the city. 6 . Section 16 - Provides for types of signs erected that are exempt from permitting. No provisions or definitions were made in #350 for these types of signs . 7 . Section 19 - This section was created to catagorize the various types of business signs. #350 divided signs into two groups; freestanding signs and attached signs. This section attempts to differentiate between the types of signs and their use. City of Southlake.Texas Michael H. Barnes August 29, 1991 Page 2 8. Section 19(H) - A multi-purpose sign was added for use in shopping centers with a maximum square footage of 150 square feet. 9. Section 19(I) - Readerboard sign provisions defined for both electronic and manual type. 10. Section 19(J) - Subdivision sign requirements are defined to control their use during growth. 11. Section 21(H) - Vehicular signs are declared prohibited as this type of signage is not compatible with the type of signage existing. -a _ - vl ....) = ow . I, 4 ■ _ . . 4 00 al = rim rtZ N, -'s „4. c7Q 3 -.' 1)0 il■ go _ ill - i No c r) 0 4 t1 re) PE: N i -.. ...„,.. Q I 0% tNe, co in OMONOPR, A I ‘41 L -- o 1 • V. ° ':' Q VD iiii •C"\- r a. -r_ ;ix C3 to ro c( ; tu 1 7 4) 0 ....... I I E-4 tu -•'," \..) *.'• OPP • IN O THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF t(,4/Ldjj I, 6_.. V as a member of the 0,-,./1- make this of i•avit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and /or a person or persons related to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be eculiarly affected by me a vote or decision of the / i ; 7if'�, q -/ r as those terms are defined in Cha�ter 171, Texas Loc. Government Code. The business entity is �9 `A LA � ,) ,4' gip (n and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or • shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. rr Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair fib market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a r member. *■ Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm is that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter ,,,,, whatsoever. Signed this 5 day of Atpinth.a) , 19g1 ,. 'gnature of official is Title OW BEFO ME, he undersigned authority, this day personally appeared 'I' �� and on oath stated that the facts he . nabove stated are true to the best of AI knowledge or belief. Swor to and subscribed to before me on this 3 day of Si 4k) , 19 . 1VA . LeGRAND oil �tc r,� Public / (e / a'@'ATE OF TEXAS otary Pub is in and for - .- f y,C:Qmm. .Exp.02iO4/93 the State of Texas My Commission Expires: 6and,)/A 1 , (Shand Type /Print Notary's Name IPR int ton s WM m THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF 1 4 0 *P feaS0/ as a member of the e' (e make this affidavit and hereby on oath state t following: I, and /or a person or persons related to me, ha e a substantial interest in a business enti y that would be peculiarl�y affected by ms a vote or decision of the Iqqd.. Z{¢,, th Cj,4. q e,M a.tias as those terms are defined in CHtpter 171, Texas Local Gbvernment Code. m The business entity is /600 /Yf Apt, gZ,ea << reptc W . 1-1,a i 14- (ngne and address) a I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following j easons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. V // Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. rr Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected "' by a decision of the public body of which I am a ire member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this ft business entity and from any further par 'ation on this matter „,,, whatsoever. Signed this 3 day of ' - ! , 19 9) . ms erdil . • ;' re o official CB C or Q✓ Pie, Z. Title aim BEF l- ME the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared � ��i�j,�,(,Q,1 � and on oath stated that the facts he )-inabove stated are true to the best of '2l knowledg- or belief. Swor 0 to and subscribed , to b fore me on this ,g day of ��rL 19 5Ektp,,,, SANDRA L. LeGRAND ^ 1 * 1. Notary Public o r p i s in an for SPATE OF TEXAS the State of Texas wo My Comm. Exp. 02/04/93 My Commission Expires: L , /tee lsfuhi J 0.)1 Type /Print Notary's Name OPIR lie ■r is O gii is 9/91 ri. PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • FOR SERVICES OF THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS /ROANOKE ANIMAL SHELTER • I. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES J. Emergency Calls wi A. Emergency calls for vicious /injured animals will be responded to 24 hours is a day /7 days a week. B. Stray /Found Animals is Animals found by the City or its residents will be picked up between 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. 7 days a week (except holidays). r i Residents should be encouraged to take stray /found animals directly to the shelter, in order to maintain 2 shelter workers at the facility as often as possible. ii C. Quarantine Facilities Facilities will be provided for the quarantine of animals involved in biting incidents. This service will be provided at no additional charge for stray animals. :: However, if an owned -pet is involved in a biting incident, the owner will be charged $15 /day for the 10 -day quarantine period. D. Investigation Assistance The Humane Society will provide the City with assistance in the investigation of reported bite incidents and animal abuse /neglect cases. II. SHELTER SERVICES km 1. Holding Period A. Stray animals that are in good health and deemed to be adoptable will be ill held for possible reclaim by an owner for a period of ten (10) days. If the animal is not claimed within ten days, the animal will be held for :" adoption for a minimum of fourteen (14) additional days. B. Stray animals that are injured or diseased will be held for a minimum of 1: five (5) days unless immediate euthanasia is required. Note: Any animal not reclaimed by its owner will be held for adoption or humanely destroyed within the above guidelines at the discretion of The Humane Society. r ii III. HUMANE SOCIETY SERVICES 1. Finding homes for unwanted animals 2. Assisting owners to locate lost pets PR 3. Development of a spay /neuter program l 4. Promoting responsible pet ownership through education 5. Promoting the humane treatment of all animals is i rill Imi SHELTER OPERATING BUDGET (Revised 9/91) :: MONTHLY YEARLY ! . Salaries 6 Manager 1,140 13,680 Assistant 957 11,484 :: Assistant 775 9,300 Subtotal 2,872 34,464 FICA /Workman's Comp. 380 4,560 r Total Salaries $3,252 $39,024 hi . Veterinary Supplies /Services $1,200 $14,400 . Utilities /Phone $1,150 $13,800 . Food /Other Supplies $ 600 $ 7,200 . Truck Maintenance $ 300 $ 3,600 "" . Building Maintenance $ 300 $ 3,600 . Body Disposal $ 300 $ 3,600 . Building Insurance $ 80 $ 960 . Truck Insurance $ 75 $ 900 . Office Supplies /Postage $ 75 $ 900 10 . . Property Taxes $ 40 $ 480 TOTAL $7,372 $88,464 ii I" iii P iii l ii r r be City `if Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M CITY MANAGER August 29, 1991 1 d - ! / �- TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager an FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Award Contract for Drainage Improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates On Wednesday, August 14, 1991, at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened and read aloud for the drainage improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates. The low bidder was Jeske Construction Company with a bid price of $16,131 for Continental Park Estates and $14,601.50 for Mission Hills. The bids as a whole were considerably higher than expected even though the low bidder was close to the estimated amount of $25,000 to $30,000. The Mission Hills project was approximately $5,000 higher r than verbal quotes given to staff prior to advertising the project. Consequently, the staff, Cheatham & Associates, have looked at two alternatives of providing adequate drainage facilities besides what was bid. The first alternative was installing underground pipe facilities. The contractor (Jeske Construction Co.) estimated a cost of $16,740 for a 10 -foot inlet, 225 feet of 30" pipe and a concrete headwall. This was judged too expensive. The second alternative was to install a concrete flume from the street to the base of the existing wash out. The flume would be reduced to approximately 6 foot wide and 1 foot deep and approximately 210 feet long. Cheatham & Associates designed the flume and submitted it to the contractor for pricing. Since the cross section of the flume was the same as that of the flume for Continental Estates, the unit cost of the flume is already bid. The total cost for this alternate is estimated to be $12,400. This particular method would be the best alternative in staff's opinion because it would provide a concrete lined ditch for the section needed, whereas the original channel bid was designed for half grass Po and half concrete. The original plans for Mission Hills showed a 30" culvert under San Juan Drive and a natural earth channel from the culvert easterly to the lake. The original slopes of 5% and 15% have proven to be too steep to prevent erosion of the .• natural channel. Attached is a letter from Cheatham & Associates recommending that the revised concrete flume be installed in lieu of the Wm original design. /a Afri Citysf Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk "" August 29, 1991 Page 2 o Staff concurs with Cheatham & Associates recommendation and recommends that the low bidder, Jeske Construction Company be awarded the contract for the Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates at a cost of $30,732.50 and that the Mission Hills project be constructed using the same cross section and unit price as that of the Continental Estates project. This change is within the contract allowable amount and agreeable with the contractor. IP Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. 1 i MHB /lc attachment: Cheatham & Associates letter bid tabulation km 1 1 it 1 rn 1 /b49-.2 08/30/91 07:49 '$8176409665 CHEATHAM & ASSOC -►-+ -> CITY OF SOUTHLAK [1002 4 - . ,i„ _. - -.. • : - -.... it ASSOCIATES - - - - e - Ili Inagust 36,. 1991 PR - _ - ' - . . Mr. Miii EBarne ..E. - _ • Dim 'or of Publ ic Works City of - • .. . 667 N: .Caiwall Ave. _ _ • Stertbl ake, T 76092 �� - - S 7 ill P : .� - - - . • • .. Mi scion R l 1 g & COR2ti ripri Pack Estates • • In - 'Tab No. 001 -207 - _- - Dear Mitre: • - - - • • PI - .. - ... . -•. . IIII • We Pave reautecl. that .the 7 ow bidder, Jeske Construction, ctiOn, on the subject' • - - .. . ,-_ • projects submit to us a.. price for. a comrete. flume' -the street to :the - - : • p o mt - o f discharge f o r t h e Mi ssi n• Fri 71.. project. ' After additional - . . -- -- - - -c iOideration, we feel. that a- cc�x ebe •flu would • be better from - a city _ - r enarip standpoint, alit should-provide a better pr d ct. fie car . 's price for the flum, based upon unit prices bid an. both - • il rwoje tss is $12,400.00. _ We also asked the corrtracbxc to provide a price for an enclosed nclose - - i iii _ . c msi s� of a _curb inlet and a pipe to carry the water back to the point of* discharge- with a type 'EP bead_wall on the end of the pipe.: Tae price for this is $16.,74000. As yai are • ayaare, the bids were based upon leaving the front- section of the - . sod and - flume in place, axed rte r 'g the. section whirh bad failed with _ concrete rip-rap. - Toe low bid for this Was $14,601.50. : - • iii _ Eopefvn one of these •alternatives will be satzsfactoxy to both. the city and. • . - :tie ester vwn r If you have any questions, please give a- -0311. 1 ilia l: rt-fiiY, '' - _ Eddie- Cheatham, • P.E. _. - • F2ET! • �.: . - ice : -_ - - . .. - -- • : .. _ ENGINEERS • PY.ANNERS • SURVEYORS - - - -- - - A Subsidiary Fir _ ind Design, Inc_ - - • a ii ^7n r",•...,.,,.,.m*a r,-:•,P ID A 3 Arlin non _Texa§ 7600E • _ C EO sr,� Environmental Institute for Technology Transfer EN The University of Texas at Arlington se �r Box 19050 • Arlington, Texas 76019 -0050 ~ 'mac p„�t"` Metro (817) 273 -2300 00 July 23, 1991 Mr. Curtis Hawk, City Manager ok City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: It was a pleasure having lunch with you the other day, and I discovering that our interests in a project appear to be compatible. Here is a proposal for you, as requested; if you ,., have any changes or additions please let me know, as this al proposal is changeable. My fall class, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site Planning," would be made available to develop several alternative future land use patterns for the area surrounding Highway 114 in Southlake. The following tasks would be completed by the class: 1. Collect and map data on slopes, soil types, tree PPR coverage, floodplains and wetlands, proximity to roads, proximity to water and /or sewer lines, existing nearby land uses, existing zoning, and other factors as needed, for all vacant land in the corridor. l>r 2. Meet with city officials, area landowners (Mobil, for example) and community leaders to obtain guidance * regarding what their goals and objectives are for the area. 3. Combine this information with the other data to produce maps of areas that are best suited for various types of future land use. This will be done using the ALLOT lor computer model, which is explained at the end of this list. 4. Forecasts of demand for various land uses in the Highway 114 corridor will then be developed. The class will then use the model to produce at least two alternative future "optimal" land use patterns for the area. These maps can then be used by the city as a basis for planning, MI zoning, and subdivision approval. • The ALLOT model uses a simple geographic database plus information on community goals to analyze the area under study. Once it is installed, it is easy to run and requires e An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 0. only an IBM personal computer. The model allows rapid mapping of items important to each community, and can `+✓ produce a wide variety of alternative future land use patterns from which local officials may select. It was first developed for the Richland - Chambers Lake area near Corsicana, and was used successfully there to plan land uses !" and site landfills. Since then, the model has been presented at conferences throughout the world. It is now being copyrighted in preparation for widespread marketing to cities, counties and states. Before this takes place, we "" would like to apply it in several Metroplex locations, it hopefully including Southlake. A recent IUS graduate and I have developed, perfected, written about, and presented papers at meetings on this model for the past two years. He has a graduate degree in City and Regional Planning, and is willing to handle the technical aspects of applying the software to Southlake as well as being available to complete any general planning tasks that you may wish to have done. Perhaps combining an !" internship position with this project could keep the project cost low while also providing manpower for planning activities. This option is addressed on the attached cost P sheet. In any case, this appears to be an opportunity for Southlake to utilize the class to complete a planning project at a much lower cost than that of a consulting firm- -and with the involvement of a top -notch team of experts, of course! Additionally, the city would benefit from having access to a state -of- the -art planning approach before it is widely distributed. The class would benefit from having a "real world" example to work on, and UTA would benefit by completing another successful application of our planning methodology and by providing service to you (as you know, this is one of SUPA's primary missions). The class begins the last week of August and ends in early December; therefore, I anticipate that meetings with community leaders would take place in September; data 0. colection and entry would be completed in October; planning and data analysis would be done in November, and a draft report would be submitted at the end of that month. O. Please let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible, so the class can "hit the ground running" in August. I hope to hear from you soon. w Sincerely, Elise M. Bright, Ph.D. Assistant Professor 0 /o /3-a w. w 0. COST ESTIMATE om Pe Cost of the project will vary with the size of the area t: i luded in the study boundaries, and the number and quality of ms and reports produced. The MAXIMUM cost is given below. P ase note that the items listed under "UTA share" are costs absorbed by the university; they are, therefore, free from your pli"int of view. TOTAL SOUTHLAKE UTA SHARE S/lary: Professional $8,300 $3,000 $5,300 "tecretarial 500 500 ptudent 150 150 Operations /Maintenance: ^opying /Printing 800 800 -Supplies /Computer Time 800 200 600 Travel /Utilities /Misc. 500 500 in 00 T LS: $11,050 $4,000 $7,050 op m e1 *. 110 No eM Imik w. 111 In ON Pm OW i /D0. iiii SENT BY:Inst. of Urban studies; 8 -13 -91 ; 9 :39AM ; U. T. Arlington-0 ;# 3 Proposed Draft Work Plan for the City of Southlake Texas: Highway 114 Corridor Study Dr. Bright's fall graduate -level class in City and Regional Planning, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site Planning," will complete the following tasks, under the guidance of Dr. Bright and her research associate, Mr. Nam'. e1 I. Suitability Analysis All vacant land in the corridor will be analyzed to ensure 11 that recommended development will be compatible with the natural features of the area and will also be located so as to minimize city expenses for infrastructure. Key elements to consider: tree coverage lakes and wetlands flood plains slopes soil types so visual quality and aesthetic appeal existing zoning (including the airport overlay zone) availability of water and sewer location and type of access compatibility with existing land uses, particularly at the corridor's edge and the area near the IBM complex II. Development of Alternative Futures * Results of Task I will be combined with the city's goals er and objectives for the area and with estimates of demand for various kinds of development. it * Alternative visions and fresh ideas will be actively solicited, then evaluated for their economic feasibility. * A range of demand forecasts will be developed after consideration of such factors as the influence of Alliance Airport, the city's goals, and overgrowth trends. * The issue of whether to concentrate or disperse office, retail, and related uses will also be addressed. SENT BY:Inst. of Urban studies; 8 -13 -91 ; 9:40AM ; U. T. Arlington- ;u 4 2 III. Implementation After steps I and II aro completed, more specific ideas may be developed which will allow the city to achieve the visions is developed earlier. These may include: so * Ways to integrate urban design and aesthetics throughout the corridor via uniform signage, color, landscaping, structural items (for example, landmark structures or street lights), and use of pocket parks. * Ways to achieve compatibility with the visual and aesthetic quality of the IBM complex (present and planned) * Recommendations for buffering -- methods and criteria. * Designs for the 180 -acre commercial tract to the southeast. ei * Recommendations for highway access and curbage. * Review of existing sign and landscape ordinances to ensure that they will achieve desired results. A selection of items from the above list will be made later in the semester, based on available class time, student sw interests, and city priorities. Selection will be necessary because it is impossible to complete all the tasks needed for implementation with the resources of a single class; however, completion of one or two items should be feasible at this time. Those tasks which remain could possibly be completed by other classes as a separate project. NIS / a-s • NT BY:Inst, of Urban Studies; 8-13 -91 ; 9 :40AM S U, T. Arlington-' ;# 5 3 End Products End products of this project will include a written report, summary and maps and other graphics as needed to visually Pio depict the project's results. Black- and -white graphics will be delivered in reproducible form, as will the text of the report. 1ef Project personnel will be available to make one presentation to ,� whatever group the city chooses when the work is completed. Time Schedule September: City officials visit with the class. Research associate begins work on database. Class and city develop goals and objectives for the area. Meetings with any other appropriate group (residents, Mobil, IBM ?) should be held at this time. October: Data collection and mapping for Task I begins. Data entry begins. Goals and objectives are converted to numerical weights. November: Data is analyzed using ALLOT model. Alternative forecasts of demand for WI various land use types are developed. Alternative futures are developed, based on all previous tasks. Preliminary results reviewed with city. December: Production of all maps and reports for Tasks I 4 and II is completed. Personnel are available for presentation. +.. Work on Task III begins after selection of specifics by city and UTA staff. Spring: Task III items selected by city and UTA officials err are completed and presented. er m" is ms r /e r0- 7