The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-09-03 CC Packet _ - vl ....) = ow . I, 4 ■ _ . . 4 00 al = rim rtZ N, -'s „4. c7Q 3 -.' 1)0 il■ go _ ill - i No c r) 0 4 t1 re) PE: N i -.. ...„,.. Q I 0% tNe, co in OMONOPR, A I ‘41 L -- o 1 • V. ° ':' Q VD iiii •C"\- r a. -r_ ;ix C3 to ro c( ; tu 1 7 4) 0 ....... I I E-4 tu -•'," \..) *.'• OPP • IN O THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF t(,4/Ldjj I, 6_.. V as a member of the 0,-,./1- make this of i•avit and hereby on oath state the following: I, and /or a person or persons related to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be eculiarly affected by me a vote or decision of the / i ; 7if'�, q -/ r as those terms are defined in Cha�ter 171, Texas Loc. Government Code. The business entity is �9 `A LA � ,) ,4' gip (n and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or • shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. rr Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair fib market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a r member. *■ Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm is that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter ,,,,, whatsoever. Signed this 5 day of Atpinth.a) , 19g1 ,. 'gnature of official is Title OW BEFO ME, he undersigned authority, this day personally appeared 'I' �� and on oath stated that the facts he . nabove stated are true to the best of AI knowledge or belief. Swor to and subscribed to before me on this 3 day of Si 4k) , 19 . 1VA . LeGRAND oil �tc r,� Public / (e / a'@'ATE OF TEXAS otary Pub is in and for - .- f y,C:Qmm. .Exp.02iO4/93 the State of Texas My Commission Expires: 6and,)/A 1 , (Shand Type /Print Notary's Name IPR int ton s WM m THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF 1 4 0 *P feaS0/ as a member of the e' (e make this affidavit and hereby on oath state t following: I, and /or a person or persons related to me, ha e a substantial interest in a business enti y that would be peculiarl�y affected by ms a vote or decision of the Iqqd.. Z{¢,, th Cj,4. q e,M a.tias as those terms are defined in CHtpter 171, Texas Local Gbvernment Code. m The business entity is /600 /Yf Apt, gZ,ea << reptc W . 1-1,a i 14- (ngne and address) a I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following j easons: (Check all which are applicable) Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. V // Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. rr Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500. A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected "' by a decision of the public body of which I am a ire member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this ft business entity and from any further par 'ation on this matter „,,, whatsoever. Signed this 3 day of ' - ! , 19 9) . ms erdil . • ;' re o official CB C or Q✓ Pie, Z. Title aim BEF l- ME the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared � ��i�j,�,(,Q,1 � and on oath stated that the facts he )-inabove stated are true to the best of '2l knowledg- or belief. Swor 0 to and subscribed , to b fore me on this ,g day of ��rL 19 5Ektp,,,, SANDRA L. LeGRAND ^ 1 * 1. Notary Public o r p i s in an for SPATE OF TEXAS the State of Texas wo My Comm. Exp. 02/04/93 My Commission Expires: L , /tee lsfuhi J 0.)1 Type /Print Notary's Name OPIR lie ■r is O gii is 9/91 ri. PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • FOR SERVICES OF THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS /ROANOKE ANIMAL SHELTER • I. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES J. Emergency Calls wi A. Emergency calls for vicious /injured animals will be responded to 24 hours is a day /7 days a week. B. Stray /Found Animals is Animals found by the City or its residents will be picked up between 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. 7 days a week (except holidays). r i Residents should be encouraged to take stray /found animals directly to the shelter, in order to maintain 2 shelter workers at the facility as often as possible. ii C. Quarantine Facilities Facilities will be provided for the quarantine of animals involved in biting incidents. This service will be provided at no additional charge for stray animals. :: However, if an owned -pet is involved in a biting incident, the owner will be charged $15 /day for the 10 -day quarantine period. D. Investigation Assistance The Humane Society will provide the City with assistance in the investigation of reported bite incidents and animal abuse /neglect cases. II. SHELTER SERVICES km 1. Holding Period A. Stray animals that are in good health and deemed to be adoptable will be ill held for possible reclaim by an owner for a period of ten (10) days. If the animal is not claimed within ten days, the animal will be held for :" adoption for a minimum of fourteen (14) additional days. B. Stray animals that are injured or diseased will be held for a minimum of 1: five (5) days unless immediate euthanasia is required. Note: Any animal not reclaimed by its owner will be held for adoption or humanely destroyed within the above guidelines at the discretion of The Humane Society. r ii III. HUMANE SOCIETY SERVICES 1. Finding homes for unwanted animals 2. Assisting owners to locate lost pets PR 3. Development of a spay /neuter program l 4. Promoting responsible pet ownership through education 5. Promoting the humane treatment of all animals is i rill Imi SHELTER OPERATING BUDGET (Revised 9/91) :: MONTHLY YEARLY ! . Salaries 6 Manager 1,140 13,680 Assistant 957 11,484 :: Assistant 775 9,300 Subtotal 2,872 34,464 FICA /Workman's Comp. 380 4,560 r Total Salaries $3,252 $39,024 hi . Veterinary Supplies /Services $1,200 $14,400 . Utilities /Phone $1,150 $13,800 . Food /Other Supplies $ 600 $ 7,200 . Truck Maintenance $ 300 $ 3,600 "" . Building Maintenance $ 300 $ 3,600 . Body Disposal $ 300 $ 3,600 . Building Insurance $ 80 $ 960 . Truck Insurance $ 75 $ 900 . Office Supplies /Postage $ 75 $ 900 10 . . Property Taxes $ 40 $ 480 TOTAL $7,372 $88,464 ii I" iii P iii l ii r r be City `if Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M CITY MANAGER August 29, 1991 1 d - ! / �- TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager an FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Award Contract for Drainage Improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates On Wednesday, August 14, 1991, at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened and read aloud for the drainage improvements for Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates. The low bidder was Jeske Construction Company with a bid price of $16,131 for Continental Park Estates and $14,601.50 for Mission Hills. The bids as a whole were considerably higher than expected even though the low bidder was close to the estimated amount of $25,000 to $30,000. The Mission Hills project was approximately $5,000 higher r than verbal quotes given to staff prior to advertising the project. Consequently, the staff, Cheatham & Associates, have looked at two alternatives of providing adequate drainage facilities besides what was bid. The first alternative was installing underground pipe facilities. The contractor (Jeske Construction Co.) estimated a cost of $16,740 for a 10 -foot inlet, 225 feet of 30" pipe and a concrete headwall. This was judged too expensive. The second alternative was to install a concrete flume from the street to the base of the existing wash out. The flume would be reduced to approximately 6 foot wide and 1 foot deep and approximately 210 feet long. Cheatham & Associates designed the flume and submitted it to the contractor for pricing. Since the cross section of the flume was the same as that of the flume for Continental Estates, the unit cost of the flume is already bid. The total cost for this alternate is estimated to be $12,400. This particular method would be the best alternative in staff's opinion because it would provide a concrete lined ditch for the section needed, whereas the original channel bid was designed for half grass Po and half concrete. The original plans for Mission Hills showed a 30" culvert under San Juan Drive and a natural earth channel from the culvert easterly to the lake. The original slopes of 5% and 15% have proven to be too steep to prevent erosion of the .• natural channel. Attached is a letter from Cheatham & Associates recommending that the revised concrete flume be installed in lieu of the Wm original design. /a Afri Citysf Southlake, Texas Curtis E. Hawk "" August 29, 1991 Page 2 o Staff concurs with Cheatham & Associates recommendation and recommends that the low bidder, Jeske Construction Company be awarded the contract for the Mission Hills and Continental Park Estates at a cost of $30,732.50 and that the Mission Hills project be constructed using the same cross section and unit price as that of the Continental Estates project. This change is within the contract allowable amount and agreeable with the contractor. IP Please place this item on the Council's next agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. 1 i MHB /lc attachment: Cheatham & Associates letter bid tabulation km 1 1 it 1 rn 1 /b49-.2 08/30/91 07:49 '$8176409665 CHEATHAM & ASSOC -►-+ -> CITY OF SOUTHLAK [1002 4 - . ,i„ _. - -.. • : - -.... it ASSOCIATES - - - - e - Ili Inagust 36,. 1991 PR - _ - ' - . . Mr. Miii EBarne ..E. - _ • Dim 'or of Publ ic Works City of - • .. . 667 N: .Caiwall Ave. _ _ • Stertbl ake, T 76092 �� - - S 7 ill P : .� - - - . • • .. Mi scion R l 1 g & COR2ti ripri Pack Estates • • In - 'Tab No. 001 -207 - _- - Dear Mitre: • - - - • • PI - .. - ... . -•. . IIII • We Pave reautecl. that .the 7 ow bidder, Jeske Construction, ctiOn, on the subject' • - - .. . ,-_ • projects submit to us a.. price for. a comrete. flume' -the street to :the - - : • p o mt - o f discharge f o r t h e Mi ssi n• Fri 71.. project. ' After additional - . . -- -- - - -c iOideration, we feel. that a- cc�x ebe •flu would • be better from - a city _ - r enarip standpoint, alit should-provide a better pr d ct. fie car . 's price for the flum, based upon unit prices bid an. both - • il rwoje tss is $12,400.00. _ We also asked the corrtracbxc to provide a price for an enclosed nclose - - i iii _ . c msi s� of a _curb inlet and a pipe to carry the water back to the point of* discharge- with a type 'EP bead_wall on the end of the pipe.: Tae price for this is $16.,74000. As yai are • ayaare, the bids were based upon leaving the front- section of the - . sod and - flume in place, axed rte r 'g the. section whirh bad failed with _ concrete rip-rap. - Toe low bid for this Was $14,601.50. : - • iii _ Eopefvn one of these •alternatives will be satzsfactoxy to both. the city and. • . - :tie ester vwn r If you have any questions, please give a- -0311. 1 ilia l: rt-fiiY, '' - _ Eddie- Cheatham, • P.E. _. - • F2ET! • �.: . - ice : -_ - - . .. - -- • : .. _ ENGINEERS • PY.ANNERS • SURVEYORS - - - -- - - A Subsidiary Fir _ ind Design, Inc_ - - • a ii ^7n r",•...,.,,.,.m*a r,-:•,P ID A 3 Arlin non _Texa§ 7600E • _ C EO sr,� Environmental Institute for Technology Transfer EN The University of Texas at Arlington se �r Box 19050 • Arlington, Texas 76019 -0050 ~ 'mac p„�t"` Metro (817) 273 -2300 00 July 23, 1991 Mr. Curtis Hawk, City Manager ok City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: It was a pleasure having lunch with you the other day, and I discovering that our interests in a project appear to be compatible. Here is a proposal for you, as requested; if you ,., have any changes or additions please let me know, as this al proposal is changeable. My fall class, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site Planning," would be made available to develop several alternative future land use patterns for the area surrounding Highway 114 in Southlake. The following tasks would be completed by the class: 1. Collect and map data on slopes, soil types, tree PPR coverage, floodplains and wetlands, proximity to roads, proximity to water and /or sewer lines, existing nearby land uses, existing zoning, and other factors as needed, for all vacant land in the corridor. l>r 2. Meet with city officials, area landowners (Mobil, for example) and community leaders to obtain guidance * regarding what their goals and objectives are for the area. 3. Combine this information with the other data to produce maps of areas that are best suited for various types of future land use. This will be done using the ALLOT lor computer model, which is explained at the end of this list. 4. Forecasts of demand for various land uses in the Highway 114 corridor will then be developed. The class will then use the model to produce at least two alternative future "optimal" land use patterns for the area. These maps can then be used by the city as a basis for planning, MI zoning, and subdivision approval. • The ALLOT model uses a simple geographic database plus information on community goals to analyze the area under study. Once it is installed, it is easy to run and requires e An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 0. only an IBM personal computer. The model allows rapid mapping of items important to each community, and can `+✓ produce a wide variety of alternative future land use patterns from which local officials may select. It was first developed for the Richland - Chambers Lake area near Corsicana, and was used successfully there to plan land uses !" and site landfills. Since then, the model has been presented at conferences throughout the world. It is now being copyrighted in preparation for widespread marketing to cities, counties and states. Before this takes place, we "" would like to apply it in several Metroplex locations, it hopefully including Southlake. A recent IUS graduate and I have developed, perfected, written about, and presented papers at meetings on this model for the past two years. He has a graduate degree in City and Regional Planning, and is willing to handle the technical aspects of applying the software to Southlake as well as being available to complete any general planning tasks that you may wish to have done. Perhaps combining an !" internship position with this project could keep the project cost low while also providing manpower for planning activities. This option is addressed on the attached cost P sheet. In any case, this appears to be an opportunity for Southlake to utilize the class to complete a planning project at a much lower cost than that of a consulting firm- -and with the involvement of a top -notch team of experts, of course! Additionally, the city would benefit from having access to a state -of- the -art planning approach before it is widely distributed. The class would benefit from having a "real world" example to work on, and UTA would benefit by completing another successful application of our planning methodology and by providing service to you (as you know, this is one of SUPA's primary missions). The class begins the last week of August and ends in early December; therefore, I anticipate that meetings with community leaders would take place in September; data 0. colection and entry would be completed in October; planning and data analysis would be done in November, and a draft report would be submitted at the end of that month. O. Please let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible, so the class can "hit the ground running" in August. I hope to hear from you soon. w Sincerely, Elise M. Bright, Ph.D. Assistant Professor 0 /o /3-a w. w 0. COST ESTIMATE om Pe Cost of the project will vary with the size of the area t: i luded in the study boundaries, and the number and quality of ms and reports produced. The MAXIMUM cost is given below. P ase note that the items listed under "UTA share" are costs absorbed by the university; they are, therefore, free from your pli"int of view. TOTAL SOUTHLAKE UTA SHARE S/lary: Professional $8,300 $3,000 $5,300 "tecretarial 500 500 ptudent 150 150 Operations /Maintenance: ^opying /Printing 800 800 -Supplies /Computer Time 800 200 600 Travel /Utilities /Misc. 500 500 in 00 T LS: $11,050 $4,000 $7,050 op m e1 *. 110 No eM Imik w. 111 In ON Pm OW i /D0. iiii SENT BY:Inst. of Urban studies; 8 -13 -91 ; 9 :39AM ; U. T. Arlington-0 ;# 3 Proposed Draft Work Plan for the City of Southlake Texas: Highway 114 Corridor Study Dr. Bright's fall graduate -level class in City and Regional Planning, "Land Suitability Analysis and Site Planning," will complete the following tasks, under the guidance of Dr. Bright and her research associate, Mr. Nam'. e1 I. Suitability Analysis All vacant land in the corridor will be analyzed to ensure 11 that recommended development will be compatible with the natural features of the area and will also be located so as to minimize city expenses for infrastructure. Key elements to consider: tree coverage lakes and wetlands flood plains slopes soil types so visual quality and aesthetic appeal existing zoning (including the airport overlay zone) availability of water and sewer location and type of access compatibility with existing land uses, particularly at the corridor's edge and the area near the IBM complex II. Development of Alternative Futures * Results of Task I will be combined with the city's goals er and objectives for the area and with estimates of demand for various kinds of development. it * Alternative visions and fresh ideas will be actively solicited, then evaluated for their economic feasibility. * A range of demand forecasts will be developed after consideration of such factors as the influence of Alliance Airport, the city's goals, and overgrowth trends. * The issue of whether to concentrate or disperse office, retail, and related uses will also be addressed. SENT BY:Inst. of Urban studies; 8 -13 -91 ; 9:40AM ; U. T. Arlington- ;u 4 2 III. Implementation After steps I and II aro completed, more specific ideas may be developed which will allow the city to achieve the visions is developed earlier. These may include: so * Ways to integrate urban design and aesthetics throughout the corridor via uniform signage, color, landscaping, structural items (for example, landmark structures or street lights), and use of pocket parks. * Ways to achieve compatibility with the visual and aesthetic quality of the IBM complex (present and planned) * Recommendations for buffering -- methods and criteria. * Designs for the 180 -acre commercial tract to the southeast. ei * Recommendations for highway access and curbage. * Review of existing sign and landscape ordinances to ensure that they will achieve desired results. A selection of items from the above list will be made later in the semester, based on available class time, student sw interests, and city priorities. Selection will be necessary because it is impossible to complete all the tasks needed for implementation with the resources of a single class; however, completion of one or two items should be feasible at this time. Those tasks which remain could possibly be completed by other classes as a separate project. NIS / a-s • NT BY:Inst, of Urban Studies; 8-13 -91 ; 9 :40AM S U, T. Arlington-' ;# 5 3 End Products End products of this project will include a written report, summary and maps and other graphics as needed to visually Pio depict the project's results. Black- and -white graphics will be delivered in reproducible form, as will the text of the report. 1ef Project personnel will be available to make one presentation to ,� whatever group the city chooses when the work is completed. Time Schedule September: City officials visit with the class. Research associate begins work on database. Class and city develop goals and objectives for the area. Meetings with any other appropriate group (residents, Mobil, IBM ?) should be held at this time. October: Data collection and mapping for Task I begins. Data entry begins. Goals and objectives are converted to numerical weights. November: Data is analyzed using ALLOT model. Alternative forecasts of demand for WI various land use types are developed. Alternative futures are developed, based on all previous tasks. Preliminary results reviewed with city. December: Production of all maps and reports for Tasks I 4 and II is completed. Personnel are available for presentation. +.. Work on Task III begins after selection of specifics by city and UTA staff. Spring: Task III items selected by city and UTA officials err are completed and presented. er m" is ms r /e r0- 7