The URL can be used to link to this page

1994-09-20 CC Packet City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting September 20, 1994 1. Note on Agenda Order. Note that the Agenda for this meeting will include the special provision to hold a portion of the meeting at Johnson Elementary. (Due to the logistics involved, it would be disadvantageous to hold the entire meeting at the school.) Following the recess (Agenda Item#2C)we will have City cars available to transport you to Johnson Elementary. City Council will travel to-and-from in three cars (mine and two unmarked DPS cars) in order to avoid having more than three members in any one car, thus avoiding a gathering of a quorum. We will rent a portable P.A. system to provide adequate microphones for the City Council, staff, applicants and public. We will also have a tape recorder connected to the P.A. system. 2. Agenda Iterfi No. 4B. City Manager's Report. The administrative calendars and departmental reports are included in your packets. Please let me or the appropriate Director know if you have any questions concerning the reports. 3. Agenda Item No. 4C. SPIN Reports. There are no representatives from SPIN scheduled to speak at this meeting. Remember the City Council/SPIN Joint Work Session Thursday, September 29, 1994, 7:00 p.m. It will be held at the Solana Education Center. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 2 4. Agenda Item No. 5A. Revised Developer Agreement for White Chapel Place Addition. Recall that City Council approved 6-0 the Developer Agreement last Council meeting, approving the use of septic systems. City Council approved the use of septic systems after it appeared that the developer would be unable to secure the required off-site sewer easements. Subsequent to last meeting, the developer has been able to negotiate an agreement with the property owner who previously refused to provide for municipal sanitary sewer service rather than septic systems. City staff recommends giving credit to the developer for up to $4,000 in inspection and administrative processing fees as the City's share in the off-site sewer main. The only changes in the agreement are in Section IV A (pg. 5A-10) in packet). All other provisions of the agreement will remain the same as previously written. The provision of municipal sanitary sewer service rather than septic systems for the development would be in the best interest of the community, thus the $4,000 credit is appropriate. 5. Agenda Iteml{1o. 7A. Ordinance No. 623, 2nd Reading, Tax Lew Ordinance. The ordinance will set the tax rate at$0.449 per $100 of valuation, a decrease of$0.006 from the $0.455 tax rate for FY 93-94 budget year. A "point of order" concerning comments made during the last meeting as to how I arrived at the proposed tax rate. (It is important to emphasize that the proposal is the City Manager's, not the Finance Director's.) The calculated effective tax rate of $.43624, and the x 1.03 hearing limit (which means if you exceed you would have to publish a notice indicating so), was used as a justification to reduce the tax rate from the current level, not as a way to choose the maximum rate we can get away with without having to notify the public and putting it to a vote. The roll-back rate would be x 1.08 1 Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 , Page 3 of the M&O portion of the tax rate, plus the debt portion of the tax rate. Thus the roll back rate for the proposed budget would be $0.48815. We could actually raise taxes 3.30, from$0.455 to $0.488, without forcing an election(if an election were petitioned). Hopefully the above better explains the tax rate proposal. I apologize for not making this clear previously. I did have rationale for lowering the tax rate: to let the citizens see that the quali growth would eventually force the tax rate down, particularly with the commercial retail sales growth. Given all that has been said, this was a considerable factor in my decision making process. There would also be strong justification to leave the tax rate at $0.455 given the needs of the community in the next 3-5 years insofar as street maintenance, drainage improvements, water and sewer system improvements, and municipal facilities including a new municipal building and another fire station (perhaps two (2) new facilities when you consider eliminating the existing site), and additional staff to support service demands. The additional fire station alone will probably require a minimum of nine (9) firefighters, 61 about $280,000 in annual personnel cost in today's dollars. If the growth rate of our assessed valuation continues at a double digit number, we will be able to address our needs with no strain. If not, we'll have to be creative as usual. If growth were to stop, or slow down considerably, for any period of time, we would probably be hard pressed to keep up with our annual payments until adjustments could be made. It is critical that we attempt to increase our Undesignated General Fund balance to the planned 25% as soon as possible in order to be able to handle emergencies, unanticipated opportunities such as Wal-Mart, and short term budget shortfalls due to the reasons set Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 s Page 4 out above. We anticipate an undesignated fund balance of 17% at the end of FY 94-95. The additional $.006 would not help much this coming year, but cumulatively it could over the next few years if growth is stopped or other problems arise. Murphy's Law!! One more point on the tax rate. The citizens who were here "before" the current growth rate began in the 1990's, have not had to pay for the growth, rather, the growth has enabled the City to provide services that we were unable to provide in prior years. The numbers bear out that growth has paid for itself and for improvements to other things as well. I'll not run down the litany, but I can if requested. 6. Agenda Item No. 7C. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 624, FY 94-95 Annual Budget. Last meeting, it was suggested that staff look at salary savings we could expect due to the reality that not all new positions would be filled beginning October 1. There are twelve (12) full time and three (3)part time positions proposed in the General fund. (There are five (5) new positions proposed in the Utility Fund, but these do not affect the tax rate.) We anticipate all but the five (5) public safety positions will be filled during the first month. It could take up to two months to fill those positions, which would provide a savings of$30,000. However, bear in mind that we do not budget for turnover payoff (accrued vaca!idn and compensation time), and traditionally we use under-staffing savings as a hedge against turnover payoff. For the General Fund, our booked liability as listed in our most recent audit is $95,640 for vacation alone. Comp time is significant also, but is not currently booked as a liability. Thus I would recommend leaving the budget amount as is. FYI, attached hereto is a list of our unfunded needs for FY 94-95, i.e., $2,181,191 in items we needed to fund this year in the General Fund but could not at the proposed tax rate. Some of the listed items could be construed as a "wish list" but obviously most are not. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 5 7. Agenda Item No. 7D. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-142 (ZA 94-82). The E.C. White zoning change request. There have been no changes since 1st reading. 8. Agenda Item No. 8A. lst Reading, Ordinance No. 480-139 (ZA 94-86).. Tiffany Acres rezoning request from AG to I-2. P&Z recommended denial. Staff will make every effort to contact the applicants to ensure a representative appears before Council. It is our feeling that they thought the request ended at P&Z and they were unaware they needed to appear before Council to represent their request. A super majority vote by Council would be required for approval. 9. Agenda Item No. 8B. lst Reading, Ordinance No. 480-144 (ZA 94-88). Rezoning and Development Plan for Coventry. We have heard that the developer, David McMahan, is considering amending his plan to provide for 103 lots. On the 103 acres, it would reduce his density to where it would be in compliance with the Land Use Plan. Under the previous Land Use Plan(1988),the Low Density Residential category required "residential areas where lots are or will be one acre or larger..." Under the current Land Use Plan, "...the Low Density residential category is for single- family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre," thus 103 lots on 103 acres meets the requirement. Spot zoning would not be an issue. Whether or not City Council prefers SF-1 zoning, or RE for that matter, is another matter. 10. Agenda Item No 8C Resolution No. 94-39 (ZA 94-89). Specific Use Permit for the baseball facility. The applicant has modified the site plan to reflect the agreed upon required parking. Applicant also intends to meet the masonry requirement by providing 80% masonry on the Kimball side, and has verbally expressed willingness to do the north side also if that is what it takes to obtain approval. The applicant is still requesting variances to the bufferyards. They desire to relocate the required south bufferyard to the Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 6 Kimball frontage and the northwest corner, and request that the `F2' bufferyard along the west line be allowed with a wood fence rather than a masonry fence. 11. Agenda Item No. 8D. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-133 (ZA 94-96). Rezoning AG to SF-30, Jode Wilson. Staff and some surrounding property owners are concerned about the use of a septic system on this property. The applicant was scheduled to appear at ZBA on Thursday, 9/15/94 to request a variance to the one-acre minimum for septic use, but requested tabling at that meeting to further evaluate the sewer alternatives. There is currently a stub for potential sewer in Donley Court of Southridge Lakes. (See attached memo from Ron Harper, City Engineer, dated 9/15/94.) 12. Agenda Item No. 8E and 8F. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-148 (ZA 94-102) and Plat Showing (ZA 94-103). Applicant has six (6) acres which he is wanting to zone SF- lA and split into lots. According to the planning staff there are no outstanding issues with this request. 13. Agenda Item No. 8G. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-150 (ZA 94-108). Rezone AG to SF-lA. P&Z approved this zoning, but then the applicant requested to table the preliminary plat at P&Z until October 6 so that he could incorporate some additional acreage into the plat. Subsequently, we have received a request from the applicant to table this zoning request at City Council until October 18, at which time the preliminary plat will catch up and be on the same agenda. 14. Aizenda Item No. 8H. Resolution No. 94-44 (ZA 94-110). Specific Use Permit for petroleum operations at Fina Oil on S.H. 26. Note the applicant has requested this item be withdrawn from consideration by City Council and is only on the agenda due to the advertised public hearing. 15. Agenda Item No. 8I. ZA 94-111, Plat Revision of Lots 12R-3-A and 12R-3-B. South Lake Park Addition. The main issue with this request is the Thoroughfare Plan Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 7 recommendation for a 50' R.O.W. through this property and the property to the south, eventually to connect easterly to the Harbor Court cul-de-sac in Harbor Oaks Addition. Previous discussions during the Tim Fleet case seemed to conclude that we were not going to require this connection due to the cost of crossing the drainage channel. Mr. Scamardo owns property behind these tracts (east) and feels this road should be provided so his tract will have access to develop in the future. He also owns a smaller tract fronting on Southlake Park Drive at the north end of his larger tracts which could provide at least one access point. The P&Z Commission recommended approval without the road. 16. Aizenda Item No 9A Resolution No. 94-45, appointment to the Board of Adjustment to fill the unexpired term of Karen Reynolds. Given the nature of the work of the BOA, it would be helpful to have a full board as quickly as possible. 17. Agenda Item No 9B. Resolution No. 94-46, setting fee schedules. The recommended changes are shown through the use of highlight and strikeout. Staff will discuss the recommended changes during the meeting. The Parkland Dedication raw acreage cost is recommended to stay the same at $25,000 per acre. (Item H 29, pg. 9B-4.) Given the appraised values, we believe it is still appropriate. 18. Agenda item No 10A Requested Variance to Sign Ordinance by Blockbuster videos. Staff recommendations of the applicant's request are succinctly set out in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works. 19. Agenda Item No 10B Award of bid for N-4 Wal-Mart sewer. Note: This item will again need to be discussed in executive session. See the letter attached hereto from the contractor's attorney. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 8 20. Agenda Item No. IOC. Bank DepositoryAgreement. Staff recommends the agreement with Texas National Bank be renewed, as submitted with our legal review, for the two year term expiring September 30, 1996. 21. Agenda Item No. 10D. Employee Group Health Insurance. Staff concurs with the recommendation of our independent consultant, RWL Group, that Mutual of Omaha be selected for our group coverage. The consultants will be present at the work session to briefly summarize the recommendation. Mayor Fickes and Councilmember Evans participated in the review. 22. Staff will have handouts for discussion on Items 10E and 10F. If the hour is not too late, I would like for you to act on both items. 23. Agenda Item No. 11A is to get City Council direction on the makeup of the Board of Appeals, e.g., do you want to solicit applications through the newsletter, etc. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 24. SPIN Standing Committee/Council Joint Meeting - The first joint work session between Council and die'SPIN Standing Committee is scheduled for September 29, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. at the Solana Education Center. Note, this is a change from the previously scheduled meeting location of Bicentennial Park. The Community Building had been previously selected because of a Board of Adjustments meeting in the council chambers that same night. The limited space in the Community Building necessitated the change in meeting location. The Education Center will provide much better meeting facilities than would other locations such as the high school. The city newsletter, which is in the mail, states that the meeting will be at the Community Building. We have sent a notice of the location change to each of the SPIN Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 9 Committee chairs in their packets. We will also ensure that notices are posted at the Community Building the night of the meeting. The agenda for this meeting will be jointly developed at a meeting scheduled for Monday, September 19 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall conference room. The Mayor, Ron Maness (Standing Committee chair), Brad Bradley, Shana Rice, and myself will attend. 25. Concerning SPIN, note the mailout from Ron Maness, the "Flash" attached hereto. Before you read it you may want to take several deep breaths; at least, it upset me. It also saddens me that he would take advantage of the opportunity for constructive dialog and, in my opinion, undermine the concept and spirit of SPIN. Several Points: • I spoke with our attorneys, and there is no doubt that the letter borders on a criminal offense, i.e., using public funds for political purposes. We mailed the notice just as we mail all SPIN notices. We have never read them in advance of mailout, i.e., tried to censor the mailouts. If a candidate had been named it would have been an indictable offense. • I spoke with Ron late this afternoon and told him of my feelings. He seemed truly apologetic of the forum he used, but not the content. He may be complaining to you of my directness and bluntness. He is the elected chair of the SPIN Standing Committee and should be above turning SPIN into a political action group. • I received several calls this afternoon from recipients of his Flash, expressing real anger and concern. I do not think he is typical of the program. I honestly believe it will police itself. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 10 • I hope City Council will not let the activities of these few persons undermine what we are attempting to do. • I will be speaking to SPIN 12 tomorrow afternoon, Saturday, September 17, 3:30-5:00 at City Hall. I have been asked to bring this item up as an example of what SPIN is not about. 26. Adventure Alley Design Day is Monday, September 19, 1994. On that day, the playground designers will be meeting with Southlake children at the local schools to get their input into the design of the playground. At 7:30 p.m. that evening, a Community Meeting will be held at the Carroll High School Auditorium. Along with songs and display art about the playground, the playground's design will also be unveiled. You should be home just in time for the start of the second quarter of the Cowboy's game! 27. Planning for the City of Southlake Employee United Way Campaign has begun by city staff volunteers. We have traditionally had strong support from employees for this cause, as evidenced by the City of Southlake being in the top 100 businesses of over 50 employees, in employee per capita giving (the only municipality). 1993-1994 contributions averaged $78.78 per employee. Some of our staff and their families have been beneficiaries of United Way support, and this is one reason our employees feel very good about giving to the United Way of Tarrant County. We hope to do even better this year when our campaign kicks off in mid-October. 28. Corridor Study Update - The Corridor Study Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 28, from 7:00- 9:00 p.m. in the City Hall council chambers. The public hearing on the corridor study has been scheduled for Monday, October 17, 7:00 - 9:30 p.m. at Carroll High School cafeteria. We will set up a temporary public address system for the public hearing, similar to what we will be doing Tuesday night at Johnson Elementary. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 Page 11 29. House Moving Problems encountered the morning of Tuesday, September 13 - Some of you may have received calls from citizens complaining about house moving on W. Continental that blocked traffic. On Monday, September 12, a representative of the house moving company applied for a permit per our ordinance. Glenda Jaynes, code enforcement officer, reviewed the permit and the proposed route. She warned the mover of possible clearance problems at the bridge at Peytonville and Continental, and with trees along Continental. The mover assured her that the house would clear, and that the entire move could be accomplished in 45 minutes. He was also instructed to coordinate the move with the Department of Public Safety. Although the move began at 10:30 p.m. Monday night, delays were experienced due to clearance problems at the bridge and with the trees! Consequently, the house was blocking commuter traffic on Continental Tuesday morning. A memo from Director Campbell and Coordinator Ricky Black is attached and details the problems encountered. 30. Records Mann eg ment - Due to continuing space problems within our office, we have moved the police/fire records out of the adjacent file room. The Department of Public Safety is purchasing a system for digitizing records. This will enable us to reduce our storage requirements within this building for records and files. We anticipate other departments'geing able to take advantage of this technology at some point. 31. Public Works Update - There are only a few changes from the public works updates in the current newsletter (a copy of which is in the front pocket of your packet). The water main construction on North Kimball Avenue is now 95% complete. Construction on Summerplace, from Highland to Dove Creek Trail, should begin early October and finish in November. Also, Bob Whitehead will be on vacation and then attending an international Public Works conference in Chicago. He will return on September 29. During his absence, Ron Harper, City Engineer, will be the acting Director of Public Works. Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 16, 1994 > Page 12 32. FYI, as we discussed during the budget, the TRA will be issuing the bonds for the segment of the TRA Denton Creek Pressure System line from Kirkwood to the Roanoke TRA Treatment Plant in October. The construction bonds are estimated at $5,400,000 including engineering and R.O.W. acquisition. The City first authorized the issuance of the bonds in April, 1988, in the amount of approximately $9,758,970 (more or less). The construction was originally scheduled to be completed and operational in 1990. For reasons discussed previously, the contract was amended by the City in June, 1990, in the aggregate amount of $10,600,000 and postponed the construction of the line. We now anticipate completion of this phase of the line in 18 months. We will have more data available next City Council meeting. We anticipate participation by Lake Turner MUD as we previously discussed, along with the City of Keller and the Town of Westlake. Our first year payments will be due in February 1995 (approximately $95,000) and September 1995 ( approximately $150,000). These are provided for in the $750,000 utility capital projects fund. We will discuss this further during the budget discussion if you like. 33. FYI, the Department Public Safety has scheduled an evening shoot for September 28, 29, 30, 8:00 p.m. to midnight at the TCJC Northwest Campus. If you are interested, contact Ricky Black at ext. 761. 34. FYI, the next time you see Shana Rice she will be Shana Yelverton. She is scheduled to be married to Trey Yelverton tomorrow afternoon, so assuming she follows through she will have the name change. She will be in the office Monday, and then leaves on her honeymoon to Greece for two weeks. (When she submitted her leave form, I told her just this once!) CUV Y QUALITY OF GROWTH IN 1. SOUTHLAKE �► UA,, LtT; Y O ® Qualiy is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention., sincere effort, �► intettigent directioll and skAtful Vicectttion; ® it represents the wise o1 °r choice of man • atternat ivies. • PUBLIC SAFETY • ENVIRONMENT/PUBLIC HEALTH L • ECONOMIC IMPACT • RESPONSIBILITY SALLY HALL SPEAKS ON HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF ZONING IN SOUTHLAKE HENRY KERRY, ATTORNEY, SPEAKS ON RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS AND LAND SELLERS JOHN RAFA SPEAKS ON PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUES RON MANESS SPEAKS ON DRAINAGE AND RUNOFF ISSUES ALAN SELF SPEAKS ON ECONOMIC ISSUES OTHER COMMUNITY MEMBERS SPEAK ON SELECT ISSUES N1■ 'r f uwww 1/••w•N■•YNN 1••//■••■/•Np 1•/•••FN■•MV•• •••••N■----- INN...•N.NN. N.Nf•../.f..N\I. 1.1/N.M NNI� ■.N....H..•/N•IZ IM:N•.� IH••N.N.•..N.• �f.r.Nw./w f.Nf.H■NN■•N..\� �.... YI�••N�•N� N�••N NN�• �Y .NMN ...Y.N.■■ NI. Yt.�MMN. f..N.f.N.emo Yf.l./■w .../■■■N..NN■•N .Nw•. '.p•a■.f• H.■■•■NNN.NN N■■w� N wl. N.■■N..NN•NN M....Y• •w■.N..fNNNNw ■N.•N.N NM.■../■NN.NN NN•■•••� 'HNM•N•NN...N•I ..N.•NNI W'!•Hfp\fN.MMN. /MNM■N/•.\ •w'....■w NNNN... NNNN.NN\ \ w_suNr/•••Nua NN•NMfNw. N/■N/•..•NNNN N•NH••M•w� M/HNNN•NNN NN•.M.N//•� p'�./Nv•M/N• MN•N•HN•Nt. M•IN■•NN.N.. .M.M.NN..•.A AO.ff.w'NN.w NN•.■NNN R�N.Nf.•.NN .N...N■■-Nf.YY \ M�Y.NY.MN NN•M•.NNw . IW/M/N/NN M•NNNY.■/YN� H..N.M N.I N.aNH..••M•...t N•N.M.MM.M.•HN.aN - /N••NN♦■■N•/Nw .N■■■aH•••H•N•Y•••/%Wad IM•/a•■/••Y•//•N �■/N•MN NM•N/■N•••/N/••F _ 1/MN••MM•/M■■■ //■•/•//•M //■aMM•M■■YH/■ ••MNN■w�/•Y•MNWNN••Y . IfNNw•..M.■Maw p..■..•/NrN/.....■.N.•./f.■ MM•••a■■■/■ ••NaNN-—mmmmm Mmmmma 11 INM.MN■NNNNYt •.MMN•M1NaN.NM.■I1�111 IM.MNNY..NNM.I • MYN/Na/•l:�/11 I M.M.f.NNNMN/•mmmFm \MN..NNfr..../MMNNIMI 1••NaM•WNN■■■a/ \aMYMawN•N/■/•`y� 1■NY..■a..■aN■MN �l'YIJ-C.Nf=��■':�JI�� \N•�•M•••/•■•M/•w/••••■•••i�� w �1� �'� 10 �i•Ha■ �� 1\41��.1•.11�.N•Y�•�S w NNYMH■.;■W-�/�.I� �I•f•N• w .ifi..wi®iis'ww►1 is ■•••••aN..••■Ni.•••i.ii•••a.■w '-- INI •NWM..■..Naw 1....1 iw �•MW/N•/NN.�•�1 N■1 NMNN■uoN..wvY IUNNNNNN•NN.Y s,CI.N ...NN.N... DIY■. HMtl�H/.N..M.'=J. _INM. INaaaN■■/■YI.1t I�MN•. •Na■a•/■NaMA! � M■a■ 11 �i....Yl N■•••■/■■/■■NG11..NNNN/•••W V �,IIN■...F \/N.■..f.■.N.0•.1./N•NN.N..Mf �,� �� . I I..Y•N .NH••a■MY•C./I.p■•YMM•M/■N ' � ��i�/rHw NuuuNUN../1 u■■rNrwu.a■ / IN.\uN •wou.Nuwl.t.u■■■w...N../Y■ •■/•. 'M■N■MN/■■r-;JYpN■Mw'N//■•/MM■■HN/Y•■MM■■/ ....../H■N■•l� 1.■/•aNY �N■■■■.■/■N'1V■■•/■H■.J■/■MYaN■■•••N/N■•//H■■■■■■.■•N..... I •■■......1. •.•....... DIY//■••N•/\/•■NY•••••N••/•p••M••Y•/••■••■ff•.Y Ii1 .N••••.N• •■/■■f••■■•MMI.IpN■■N•w1/H■NN■N■■■ .... ........... ///■•■Y�ti1 p - FH•■■/■■Mt ■■■■./YN.r'IYp■■Naaff••N•//•aN/N■■a■N..•.■.N.■■•.•••HI—. FN/.N N■.. •■NN■■M��IF/■■■M■H■w'.N.N•N•N•NHH■..../■■///.■■..ff•N. 1: N/■Y Y••M ./!IFNMHa■MM�HH�N■•■N• MM .•......■. . i\..�YMW■■Y '�/■.■■w.JFM..•N./a■■M..■....NN..MY....■...•N/■NH.M w11 1 •M■■...M■■M. N.■NaN■•M.YN■.Nw/Y.■■ ..■N.N■.......••■■■■■a.��1 1 N■■NNH.MM .■/N/bNM.MM/.•.........—........■..H■..■.....■■■.•/■.■..1 1 /•/■N.YMYw •H.YpY.NaMNN/.■a...........///■/.H■■...N•.■■Mrl NN.� MfYHM■aN..N•NY.........■...Y....•■■..■.N.N..C�I .N.•M/. "...■MYM/■...Y■I.H.■■•....N..M/./../.■■.H...M� 6 e �•Mw- �NM•//NN■M■■CN■N■/■N■■.■/■■■..N•.H■■.1 7 VI 1 ...N.R NN.......N...\............N.■......N■■ r■■..O.FNp Na■•N■■7■wY■■■■.N■H...../■■■■■...I N.Na/YIN■w MM.■N=J•H•■■...a■.......•••■...� t /� .t'�J'��F..NYY.p. �I.■..■■■YN.•I ■..--_f■.MMFNM.YH.■Y- �.■■....►./. Y .... p.....YM.i ....� �•.■ NN■ Y. ■■■.■.. �I •■�NNI II 911 Yuf■•...fouuuuur tiiuu/H. I I II III ------------- �1y 1.1�11M4•�II.I•F.11-\.\�. f.HH■........./■.■ ■•�I lfll.l.".I1.11=h�11 ./��• .....■..•/■/■■.■.N•1 'M��1� MEwll�iiiii■�iiiii■il/ %%��,Yiiiiii ii�iiu■�iiiaa� .tiii•.iiniiiiii. •iiii iiiiiiiiii■•Yi■�ii�.iiiii Nuu./rnuNHow �wlpv.ul_________auuuuau.N•wu..0 Ho•u.ruuY.uu� �r.Y..NuauuuuuuN....u•m.NHNN ........./.....■••.■• •II..•■.1//■11...•■•.■........HN..■N■■■ ■•/N•■■■■■■■■-------- 'Lv_•�H................N.YNNN//N .■.■.N■•ff.•....N../t•• ••MIH■111■■■....■.■■.M.•/NN.N■■•.■.■ • f.■..Y.......■.•f■.•■■F� N/N.Y�.•■•■....•.NH..•■N■WM.NM • 0••■■■. .......•.. ..MNapHN.N N ••..•. ......N/■..•.MHH■■ V■w Y�)I.•■....■NNMNa■■. /....■M.pM.HYM••NmOM ' w.H.w L•fINN.NMN..•.NM NN...w L._Y.N..N■■■MM■/■. _ N.\N.•p IINM.N•aHNM. N.Y.■..•. N••.N.M.M.N..NN M�_�FI...■•._ NMNM.■.N.MMN. f..•N/•■.� N■MM//MNN.N. Y.JH../w N.I..YN■H.N... M N.•.■.■.�MH..NF. �N/f�NNNN N•/N.�N��.M�N/NN... ... M■ :.N..N" go* 1 1 1 � 1 • ti 1 1 1 • .......... .......... 1 • t]A�101, j wAc� - 1 2ArL C/ 2 OF- I tC w 1 6F I I � s � - u 2H I F. _ PROJECT SITE ECAO P 111 1 Z w ice sc 3N)OR O KI so o 381 !0 7At. I�1 t2 26 AL � � V -n L a, 8AI6 s SURVEY Y A I 14/ re N C Ac 116A SA z •I r •bib 1 s e e m - I n V e cm t c. 22 28 11C3 tics w --- .ri 2C10 I 7Ct ItC< � +t�' \ DRAINAGE AREA MAP j SCALE: 1" = 800' I HYDRAULIC DATA MARK AREA C tc 15 1100 Q 5 Q100 j (ACRES) (MIN.) (FPS) (FPS) (CFS) (CFS) A 22.5 0.5 15 5.5 9.6 20.8 36.5 B 51.1 0.5 20 4.7 8.5 120.1 1 217.2 _ B 69.5 0.5 20 4.7 8.5 163.3 295.4 RATIONAL METHOD USED FOR ANALYSIS _ i�G k�5 . 3 _ - 5- s y llvo2e-45 ! pA`' _ _ I 2A2 t / to \ \ ic 1 . 1 \2 O • I W I r= - "t_ B 6 _ 2N � 2 — — _ �' f _ PROJECT SITE 2f 2A a > o a' I - ( w i u Ac Low 3E S& cO coTAc. (� • G 2 � 26 A i 0" it 8A16 SURVEY A 1B 14 N eA GA 1 c wait 1 '• e e FLOW ~ :ems m - '1 O _ O 28 297 , cr 22- to �� Ice DRAINAGE AREA MAP. ��ti �� 1 = ►h �` 'I to°'?' I `VL SCALE: 1' = 800' �+L = l n1� O r �n cevt��4`� �. �,u.P • {''n rt, .` o Co Cx;-t r c t e�- HYD RA C DAT MARK AREA C tc 1 5 c 1100 0 5 Q j (ACRES) �� (MIN.) ( PS) FPS) (CFS) FS) A 22.5 0.5 15 5.5. 9.6 MA 36.5 B 51.1 0.5 20 4.7 8.5 120.1 217.2 C 8 69.5 0.5 1 20 1 4.7 8.5 163.3 1 295.4 RATIONAL METHOD USED FOR ANALYSIS .5 ANALYSIS Of LAND COVERED AREA OF LAND COVERED BY HOUSES: W 50-ft average house width D 80•11 average house depth SlabArea := W-D SlabAtsas3000-ft2 average house slab Houses 124 number of houses Slebtot := SlabAres•Houses Slabtotm372000-ft2 total area from house slabs AREA OF LAND COVERED BY DRIVEWAYS: NveW := 18-ft average driveway width Drivel := 25-ft average driveway length DriveArea DriveW•DriveL 06veAreas450•ft2 average driveway area Drivetot Houses•DrivsArsa total area from driveways DdvWu 55$00-ftz AREA OF LAND COVERED BY ROADS: RoadL := 11820•ft total length of roads In development mile := 5280-ft RoadM Roadl . mile RoadM #2.24 miles total length of roads in miles RoadW := 31-ft width of roads Rosdkes := Roadl•RoadW RoadArea:368420•ft2 total area from roads in development AREA OF LAND COVERED BY ROADS: TotelAres := Slabtot+Ddvetot+RoodArea TotalAmon 794220-ft2 total area of land covered Acre t 43580-ft2 Tote Ares Acretot := ---- - Acre Acretot a 18.23 acres total area of land covered In acres WATER D/SPL ACED BYACREAGE COVERED f0.7.48-gal IN .= 0.. 12 GallonslN := TotalAm•IN•ft• 1 12 gal Plot gallons of water as a function of Inches of rain: 8.108 5.106 4.108 GallonslN3.108 ,►+ 2.106 1.10d 0 0 2 4 e 8 10 12 IN GallonslN Table of values used 0 In= 0 gal in plot: 1 ins 495098.1 gal 2 in= 990196.3 gal 3 in= 1.49.108 gal 4 in" 1.98.108 gel 5 in= 2,48.1015 gal 8 ins 2.97.100 gal 7 inm 3.47.108 gal 8 ins 3,96.10� gal 0 in' 4.48.108 gel 101n' 4.96.10a gal 11 Ina 5.45.10d gal 12 Ins 5,94.10a gal When lotsof lots go .............. � : up f sale € F'.Y../ _: l r •al� ��i�.@yy 4'wr 3'��0 %•Ri7e e . i � � 3N�$T:..- '✓CF�' � l f r. - Developers cautious as ,P9 w �zS Y building booms, butno repeat of'80s bust seen _ , -" • BY MARKS.LEACH Fort Worth Star-Telegram Fort Worth Star-Telegram/RODGER MALLISON ames Harris knows how to succeed in the James Harris knows that overdevelop- home market.He has learned to predict J residential subdivision business. ment is a constant danger in the new- the shifts from boom to bust to boom. During his 18 years in the business, the Fort Worth developer has completed about 14,000 TARRANT COUNTY / `� lots in Tarrant County. He's ridden the market �.t .l' highs, survived the lows, and learned to foretell I the shifts from boom to bust and back again. Tarrant .0 y's 0 \\ ©� 0DIM That talent recently led him to launch a 128- most 'active �® A'rp°r` lot subdivision for the Bass family in southwest szo 1 residential develop. ` Fort Worth.Now,with rapidly increasing hous- } ing development in that part of town, it might ment'markets Fort ,Worth l-ao take longer than Harris expected to finish his , subdivision. Favorable opportunities 1-36 "I think that area could very quickly become for new lot development, 4 l-zo overdeveloped," he said of southwest Fort tend to occur in sub- Worth. "There's only so much demand in that markets with less than I-zo® La © market." twayearsr,supply . GS Southwest Fort Worth is not alone in this Supplies in excess of three to 3.5 �� years are considered cause for' position. Throughout Tarrant County, a deluge of developments is threatening to flood the sin - concem: gle-family subdivision market. #of lots with Current supply Currentsuppiy: By midyear, M/PF Research, awell-regarded Submarket preliminary of developed plus pre-. By quarter:1994 approval and platted lots Otis lots Dallas research firm that tracks the local housing market, reported that developers had secured 1.SW Fort Worth 1,591 lots 4.3 years 7.8 years city approval for 61 preliminary subdivision 2.SE Arlington '1,211 ,3.6 7.6 Y PP P rY 3. NE Fort Worth 1,112 2.8 4.9 plats totaling 7,588 lots in Tarrant County. [fall 4.5.Kellerlare area S57 j g 3.4 j . of the projects are approved (and M/PF says -� most of them will be), then the countywide lot 6.SW Arlington 788 2.7 4.0 supply will row from its current 2.9 years' of 7.Watauga/Haltom City 232 3.7 6.5 PP Y g 8. Eagle Mountain Lake area 194 • demand to 4.2 years. -9. Richland Hills area 175 1.6 2.0 "We do have some concerns about too many 10.Grapevine 113 1.6 1.9 lots coming onto the market,"says Ron Witten, Tarrant County 7,588 lots 2.9 years 4.2 years president of M/PF. "Anything over three to 31/2 'Lot supply exceeds five years;exec!numbers unavailable" ^Includes NoRh Richland Hills years is worth some concern." SOURCE:WPF Research Inc. But nobody is predicting a repeat of the 1980s Fort Worth star-Tllegram (More on I TOMES on Page 10) `-�=I✓T I� IQL1 F� f development director for Haltom of61 lots. "I've always stayed away from Tomes City. "We're watching the market Southlake because everyone else He points out that until this year, more closely," Gilliland said. "I goes there,"Sandlin said. his city had not experienced a sub- don't think anyone wants to over- No matter the area,however.the From Page I division start since the mid-1980s. develop." new rush of preliminary plats has That situation has created a lot of In fact,many preliminary plats yet to raise worries of a repeat of Developers builders builders, and pent-up demand,he said. may never make it into the lot sup- the catastrophic bust that followed cials remain guardedly op- "What might seem an overabun- ply.Local developer Mike Sandlin the overbuilding of the 1980s. about the heightened ac- dance of lots is not the case," estimated that 30 percent of the That crash was fueled largely by b tivity.What is promising,they say, Patterson said."You have an area preliminary platting activity in the decade's liberal lending poli- is increased caution from develop- that has been ripe for quite some Keller is being pursued by property cies,which often took away devel- ers and lenders and growing de- time." owners looking to increase the opers' incentives to perform by inand in some areas for new hous- Meanwhile in south Arlington, valueoftheirholdings. waivingtheir personal liability. ing and certain product types. developers are expressing enthusi- "The tract that is already platted Today's bank loans typically re- Take southwest Fort Worth: asm about the potential increase in has a lot more value,"he said. quire that developers make sizable So far this year,developers have lot development. But that leaves 70 percent of the financial contributions and line up secured preliminary approval for Long a popular area among activity aimed at new develop- contracts with builders before almost 1,600 single-family lots entry-level buyers, the region is ments.And that is too many,Sand- work begins. Those requirements there — about four-fifths of the home to more than 25 percent of lin said. are designed to protect lenders,but roughly 2,000 lots already on the Tarrant County's preliminary lot "If all that goes through, I'll be they also serve to keep lot supplies ground or fully approved,accord- total. If approved, those new lots going somewhere else," he said. in balancewith.demand. ingto ht/PF. would push total supplies to 7.6 "I'm not saying it's a bad market, "You have tti put some of your If all the proposed lots are ap- years in southeast Arlington and but there are other areas that arc own money int�the deal,"Sandlin proved,it would be enough to push four years in southwest Arlington, overlooked" said. "Nine tAes out of 10 1 al- the area's total lot inventory from compared with current supplies of Like Colleyville, for instance. ready have to have the lots sold." 4.3 years of demand to a staggering 3.6 years and 2.7 years, respec- Sandlin said the development As more preliminary lots receive 7.8 years—the highest in Tarrant lively. boom under way in Southlake has final approval ind enter the local County and well in excess of the Still,developers say there is little drawn business away from the city supply, developers".yl probably under-two-year level considered reason to worry. The market has that launched the high-dollarhous- encounter more competition to ideal for new lot development.The proved it can accommodate in- ing boom in Northeast Tarrant find users for the platted lots.The two-year standard is based on his-- creased activity. County. result should be a market moti- torical absorption rates and pro- "You have always sold more Although Colleyville has 856 vatedbydemand,not financing. jections for the future. houses in southeast Arlington than lots for a 3.1-year supply,Sandlin And,finally,there is the caution But though Harris believes anywhere else,"said Harris,who is said only 100 lots are available for on the part of the developers like southwest Fort Worth's housing wrapping up adevelopment in that custom builders.And M/PF indi- Harris, who limits his risk by growth could slow down absorp area."You may see some overde- cates that no lots were in the pre- avoiding debt and closely watching lion rates, he remains confident velopment,but it picks up pretty liminary approval phase at the end the home building market. that the Bass-owned project isunu- quick." of the second quarter. "We are much more cautious," sual enough to be successful. In fact, some markets that ap- Compare that with the South-, he said."It isn't going to crash like "The development serves a par- pear poised for overdevelopment_lake area, where 857 we saw six years ago. But it won't niche: the luxury home are seeing lot shortages in some ots threaten to nush the current be as healthy as we saw three years he said."Plus,the project product types. -yearsupp yto 3.4years. ago." financed." Keller developer Doug Gilliland i Watauga-Haltom City is an- said some small builders are hav- otherexample. ing trouble finding any lots in his • At the end of the first quarter, area,although it has a 2.5-year lot the two-city area had just 128 lots supply and enough preliminary 36C fora supply of 1.3 years,well under plats to push the total supply to 5.4 4 the two-year mark at which M/PF years, the fourth-highest in Tar- ' encourages new development.Not rant County. I surprisingly,developers took note. Volume builders are tying up ' By the end of June,two subdivi- most of the new lots,leaving many I sions had come on line, pushing customer builders scrambling for the area inventory to 303 lots for a home sites. 3.7-year supply. Also during the second quarter, approvals were "The platting is not the real con- to Am granted for three preliminary plats con- cern," said."The key is not totaling 232 lots,enough to push overprodd uce a product that's not P the Watauga-Haltom City lot sup- in demand." ply to 6.5 years—the third-highest That is how Gilliland is proceed- inthecounty. ing at Carriage Gate, a 254-lot r ,y Despite the rapid influx of new project he launched this year on lots,the market is far from becom- Keller's south side.He is develop- ing overdeveloped, said Philip ing the subdivision in small sec- ; Patterson,planning and economic tions,starting with an initial phase r RESPONSIBILITY - QUALITY OF LIFE - GROWTH - `93 COUNCIL MADE LOW DENSITY - NO JUSTIFICATION FOR SPOT ZONING - CITY/CITIZEN/MASTER PLAN COVENANT BROKEN? - 23 SQ. MI.-50K RESIDENTS MAX. WHEN TO STOP? - CONTROLLED GROWTH IMPERATIVE ALERT Nationat PPO Survey Indicates Satisfaction With Program In early 1994, a survey was conducted to explore patient satisfaction with regard to the Mutually PreferredO PPO program. Surveys were sent to recentiyy hospitalized members to find out how they feel about the program with regard to their recent inpatient hospitalization. Surveys were sent to i,o00 recently-hosplWiized members nationwide. Respondents numbered 408, which amounts*to a significant 49 percent return. •in considering all of the responses, an average of 94 percent of the respondents agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with the services and the care they receWed as well as the infomration which was provided to them," according to Peggy L ce R.N., S.S.N., M.S.A, senior managed care specialist, Group Managed Healti'i Care Programs. This mirrors the responses to the identical survey completed in late IM. Survey questions and the tabulated national responses are as follows: ,won A= Not Din= ° SM 1.I was involved in the selection of the doctor 261 81 13 28 16 who provided most of my cart wUe I was in (65%) (20%) (3%) (%) (4p) the hospitaL(399)responses 2.1U information provided by my doctor(s) 267 130 10 0 1 comcx uW my condition was adequate.(409) (65%) (32%) (2%) (0%) 11 was satisfied with the information about the 232 145 11 9 2 admitting process I received from my doctor. (58%) (36%) (31%) (2%) (1%) (3 4.1 was adequately informed about all the.tesrs 253 130 14 7 3 and/or procedures I was to receive.(407) (62%) (32%) (3%) (2%) (1%) S.7'he nurses who visited me in my room were 246 137 17 3 3 informative and wiling to answer any questions (6196) (34%) (4%) OTO) (1%} I had regarding my care. (406) 6.no care I received while I was outside my 175 M 18 6 1 room(for ta=ple,Physical therapy,X-ray, (52%) (40%) (5%) (2%) (-%) radiation therapy) was efficient,friendly,and effective. (336) UT AL0FONMAU ACOyNIPAN I&S GROUP OPERATIO- ,v n�,oe wee owe, C. 7.My doctor provided me with adequate 262 12A $ s a informadon on how to care for myself aftcr (3196) (2%) discharge,.(40Ci} &7U hospitsl provided an the seances and 240 136 10 9 6 cane that I oWacd a hospital to provide.(401) (60%) (34%) (7-%) (2°!0) (1%) 11L I was adequately informed by my doctor 166 69 5 0 1 reWding the surgery pwformed.(241) (69%) (29%) (M) (0%) a Y was satisfied with the amount of 157 72 7 3 1 information provided by the aumdLesia doctor (65%) (30%) (3%) (or nurse)regarding what these prof werc to do for mo during and after surgery. (240) a Prior to my Y,my doctors/nurses fully 132 81 11 9 1 - explaiaed what would be happon4 to me (s6".b) (359b) (5%) (4%) (-%) daring my time in the recovery room.(234) uesb,ow Io are wain responses—and thus,not to As a follow-up, all data and information collected from this survey (positive as well as negative) was shared with the FPO Providers. Questions regarding the survey should be direeted to Hawkins at won 5831. t lIiii,,, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Schedule of Unfunded Needs FY1994-95 .Wk4 GENERAL FUND TOTAL DEPARTMENT/Division ITEM AMOUNT PERSONNEL OPERATIONS CAPITAL 100-GENERAL GOVERNMENT 105-Support Services Remove gasoline/diesel tanks City Hall 15,000 0 15,000 0 Portable buildings-parking City Hall 100,000 Q Q 100,000 TOTAL 115,000 0 15,000 100,000 106-FINANCE 106-Finance Information Systems-Replace existing system 175.000 0 0 175,000 140-PUBLIC WORKS 144-Streets and Drainage Maint-Street Repair Material 11,000 0 11,000 0 1 Street/Drainage Maintenance Worker 22,673 22,673 0 0 Office Equipment 500 0 0 500 Flat Bed Trailer 25,000 0 0 25,000 Blue Print machine 5,000 0 0 5,000 Survey equipment 6,000 0 0 6,000 Land for Public Works yard 75,000 0 0 75,000 Drainage Improvements-Continental Estates 120,000 0 0 120,000 Drainage Improvements-Mission Hills 60,000 0 0 60,000 Seal coat-Harbor Oaks,Heatherwood Estates, 50,000 0 0 50,000 Quail Creek Estatates,Dove Estates Rebuild Love Henry Court 39,300 0 0 39,300 Rebuild Pine/Lilac 175,000 0 0 175,000 Rebuild Burney(Carroll/Lonesome Dove) 100,000 0 0 100,000 Rebuild Bob Jones 500,000 0 0 500,000 Rebuild Southlake Parkway 200,000 0 0 200,000 Rebuild Brock Drive 50,000 0 0 50,000 Rebuild Harrell Drive 65,000 0 0 65,000 Culvert-Scenic Drive 80,000 0 0 80,000 Culvert-Shady Lane 80,000 0 0 80,000 Culvert-Carroll Road @ Continental 80-000 Q Q 80,000 TOTAL 1,744,473 22,673 11,000 1,710,800 145-Parks/Recreation 14on truck with utility bed 22,000 0 0 22,000 Line striper 1,400 0 0 1,400 Utility cart 6,500 0 0 6,500 Improvements to Bicentennial Park Practice fields 5,500 0 0 5,500 Practice Fields-Carroll Elementary 11,800 0 0 11,800 Field Improvements 13,000 0 0 13,000 Addition practice fields for baseball/softball 5,600 0 0 5,600 Front end loader attachment 5,750 0 0 5,750 Widen entrance to Bicentennial Park 1,800 0 0 1,800 Permanent trash receptacles 1,500 0 0 1,500 Parking lot striping 600 0 600 0 Parking blocks for paved lot/cross ties 1,305 0 0 1,305 Fertilizer sprayer 1,500 0 0 1,500 Canopy backstops Field#2 and#3 1,800 0 0 1,800 Preschool/disabled accessible playground 8,600 0 0 8,600 5 picnic tables 6,900 0 0 6,900 Bollards at park entrance 800 0 0 800 Mail slot at Community Building 725 0 0 725 Office Equipment 3,028 0 0 3,028 Maintenance Building furnishings 1,380 0 0 1,380 Office Door 300 0 0 300 Additional lighting-playground/walkway 5,400 0 0 5,400 Tree replacement-9 2,250 0 0 .2,250 n Waste receptacles-Lodge/Community Bldg. 520 0 0 520 a CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Schedule of Unfunded Needs FY1994-95 vjmmld.WM GENERAL FUND TOTAL DEPARTMENT/Division ITEM AMOUNT PERSONNEL OPERATIONS CAPITAL 140-PUBLIC WORKS 145-Parks/Recreation(cont) Water hydrants-2 650 0 0 650 Recycling Station 390 0 390 0 Fitness Course/Trail 15,500 0 0 15,500 Auger Attachment-tractor 350 0 0 350 Batter's box stabilizer mats 600 0 0 600 Bleachers Field#2 and#3 3,600 0 0 3,600 Bike rack 300 0 0 300 Tennis Court Improvements-bulletin&backboard 500 0 0 500 Gate at water tower site 400 0 0 400 Gazebo 13,700 0 0 13,700 Presentation equipment M Q Q 7ZQ TOTAL 146,718 0 990 145,728 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,181,191 22,673 26,990 2,131,528 r VACATION ACCRUAL SEPTEMBER 30.1993 *Denotes employee not eligible for vacation pay-less than one year tenure 10/22/93 vacat92.wk3 Division Name Hours Rate Total Current Year 45% Long Term 55% 100.00 LeGrand 210.68 19.471 4.102.18 1,845.98 2,256.20 Carpenter 54.48 11.500 626.52 281.93 ML.59 4,728.70 2,127.91 2,600.78 103.00 Bush 140.44 12.800 1,797.63 808.93 988.70 Hawk 105.98 35.096 3,719.49 1,673.77 2,045.72 Rice* 21.56 0.000 0_00 0_00 0_00 5,517.12 2,482.70 3,034.42 105 Cansler 59.00 8.653 510.53 229.74 280.79 106.00 Collins 50.24 10.868 545.98 245.69 300.29 Heath 86.68 25.500 2,210.34 994.65 1,215.69 Woods 40.80 9.485 387.03 174.16 212.87 Powers 54.00 8.500 459.00 206.55 252.45 3,602.35 1,621.06 1,981.29 107.00 Burt 137.47 11.298 1,553.14 698.91 854.22 White 43.20 9.500 410.40 184.68 225.72 Sessions 64.92 13.288 862.66 388.20 474.46 2,826.19 1,271.79 1,554.41 131.00 Estes 76.65 8.438 646.77 291.05 355.72 Finn 120.75 8.930 1,078.30 485.23 593.06 Fruci 220.43 8.438 1,859.99 836.99 1,022.99 Hankins 76.65 8.438 646.77 291.05 355.72 Homick 253.69 8.933 2,265.45 1,019.45 1,246.00 Kovar* 9.24 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parker 138.71 9.336 1,295.00 582.75 712.25 Powell 89.61 8.433 756.13 340.26 415.87 Scamardo 84.13 8.438 709.89 319.45 390.44 Stewart 139.37 13.851 1,930.41 668.69 1,061.73 Testerman 212.14 9.335 1.980.54 891.24 1.089.30 Williams 120.12 21.000 2,522.52 1,135.13 1,387.39 Wilson,G. 123.07 10.094 1,242.27 559.02 683•25 16,934.04 7,620.32 9.313.72 132.00 Black,B. 46.20 12.685 586.05 263.72 322.33 Clark 46.20 12.685 586.05 263.72 322.33 Daniels 56.06 14.998 840.79 378.35 462.43 Gregg 207.20 16.151 3,346.49 1,505.92 1,840.57 Hart 78.76 13.288 1.046.56 470.95 575.61 Hinkle 51.14 14.998 767.00 345.15 421.85 Jackson 23.16 19.183 444.27 199.92 244.35 Law 106.26 13.550 1.439.82 647.92 791.90 Mader 127.62 13.739 1,753.37 789.02 964.35 McAmis 80.02 13.738 1,099.39 494.73 604.67 Moore 135.10 14.993 2.026.23 911.80 1,114.43 Paul 92.98 13.268 1,235.52 555.98 679.54 Robertson 205.06 14.996 3,075.49 1,383.97 1,691.52 Sanchez 83.78 12.665 1,062.75 478.24 584.51 Sanders 61.32 13.288 814.82 366.67 448.15 Stewart,T. 119.64 13.733 1,643.73 739.68 904.05 Ward 200.04 13.268 2,658.13 1,196.16 1,461.97 Wood 63.40 13.739 871.05 391.97 479.08 Wydck 111.86 13.720 1,534.72 690.62 844.10 26,832.23 12,074.51 14,757.73 133.00 Black 406.55 14.998 6,097.44 2,743.85 3,353.59 Campbell 171.82 27.313 4,692.83 2,111.78 2,581.06 Foster 25.36 9.027 228.92 103.02 125.91 Garza 88.64 9.865 874.43 393.50 480.94 Gonzales 52.36 8.680 454.48 204.52 249.97 Neathery 90.30 11.968 1,080.69 486.31 594.38 Norwood 33.36 9.027 301.14 135.51 165.63 Rea 63.68 11.060 704.30 316.94 387.37 Tryon 43.52 9.865 429.32 193.20 236.13 - 14,863.57 6,688.61 8,174.96 f _ 142.00 Bryson 114.56 10.000 1.145.60 515.52 630.08 Hennen 63.00 7.665 482.90 217.30 265.59 Ward 110.88 13.125 1.455.30 654.89 8W.42 Wilson 147.08 12.020 1,767.90 795.56 972.35 4.851.70 2,18326 2,668.43 144.00 Aldredge' 18.48 0.000 0.00 0.00 0•00 Akom 95.24 8.091 770.59 346.76 423.82 Dowdy 224.52 9.038 2.029.21 913.15 1,116.07 Hughes' 18.48 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Morain 114.76 12.480 1.432.20 644.49 787.71 Payton 89.32 15.000 1.339.80 602.91 736.89 Sizemore 15.48 7.780 120.43 5420 66.24 Wright 70.76 8.653 612.29 275.53 336.76 6.304.53 2,837.04 3.467.49 145.00 Harvey 43.12 12.019 518.26 23322 285.05 Taylor 40.04 9.000 360.36 162.16 198.20 878.62 395.38 483.24 146.00 Morey` 12.32 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Whitehead* 33.88 0.000 0_00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 Elgin 92.40 16.827 1.554.80 699.66 855.14 Gandy 17427 14.425 2,513.84 1.13123 1,382.61 Jaynes 4620 9.710 448.60 201.87 246.73 Last 144.84 22.600 3,273.38 1.473.02 1,800.36 7,790.63 3,505.79 4,284.85 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 95,640.22 43.038.10 52.602.12 147.00 Brackett* 30.80 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bramlett 111.56 15.500 1,729.18 778.13 951.05 Cheatham 227.36 15.256 3.468.60 1,560.87 1,907.73 Dukes 13.96 8.750 122.15 54.97 67.18 Gardner 34.76 9.194 319.58 143.81 175.77 Kelsey 168.39 9.402 1,583.20 712.44 870.76 Patterson 35.30 12.064 425.86 191.64 234.22 Robbins 93.94 9.974 936.96 421.63 515.33 Stokes 19.92 8.653 172.37 77.57 94.80 8,757.90 3,941.06 4,816.85 148.00 Foster 73.92 7.780 575.10 258.79 316.30 Ishmael 52.92 8.653 457.92 206.06 251.85 1,033.01 464.86 568.16 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 9,790.92 4,405.91 5.385.01 GRAND TOTAL 105.431.14 47.444.01 57,987.12 City of Southlake,Texas s MEMORANDUM September 15, 1994 TO: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: ZBA Case 212 Sanitary Sewer Availability Per your request I am providing information relative to the referenced ZBA case. The subject property is located on North Peytonville, adjacent to Phase 3 of Southridge Lakes Addition. At the time that Phase 3 was constructed a utility easement was provided to the north property of line of Southridge Lakes (approximately 250 feet from the west property line of this property). In addition a sewer stub was constructed on Donley Court in Phase 3. This stub is approximately 500 feet from the subject property. There is approximately 14 feet of vertical fall from the subject property to the flow line of the sewer line on Donley Court. It is technically feasible to install a sanitary sewer line between the property and the existing sewer. The applicant would need to obtain an easement from the abutter to the west of the subject property, and arrangements would need to be made to access the easements on the existing properties in Southridge Lakes. The construction cost of this line would be approximately $6,500. ($10/LF for 6" sewer (500 LF) and $1,500/manhole.) These costs do not include any costs in acquiring easements, replacing fences, or installing a service from the house to the property ljne. RJH/rjh RECEIVED ALAN M. GLASSMAN S EP 16 1994 Attorney at Law 3525 Cedar Springs DEPI OF PUBLIC WORKS Dallas, Texas 75219 Atan M.Glassman Area Code 214 Telephone:528,5M Fax 52&11-n September 14, 1994 Mr. Robert R. Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: My Client: Southern Mechanical Plumbing, Inc. Bid Received on August 24, 1994 for the N-4 Wal-Mart Gravity Spur Dear Mr. Whitehead: F This firm represents Southern Mechanical Plumbing,Inc.which submitted a bid on the above project on August 24, 1994. As you know, my client made an error in its bid of $51,000.00, which it discovered on August 31, 1994,and immediately notified your representative Mr.Bill Haukin of Cheatam and Associates, both by telephone and by written memorandum on that same date. Despite this, this bid was submitted to the City Council and was accepted on September 6, 1994, six days after being notified of the error. The city clearly suffered no damages as a result of the prompt notification by Southern Mechanical Plumbing, Inc. My client cannot accept the contract as enclosed in your letter of September 8, 1994,but would be willing to meet wi&you in an attempt to resolve the situation. Should you wish to proceed otherwise, my client will vigorously defend any claim made against the bid bond. Please direct all further correspondence to me at the above address. Thank you very much. S ly yours, 7 , ,I/" M.fiGLAS MAN ATTORNEY AT LAW cc: Mr. Bill Haukin Cheatam and Associates ' N City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGEF� MEMORANDUM *#AW� September 15, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: House Moving Detail Attached is a report from Coordinator Ricky Black concerning the house moving detail. These observations are the only comments that I have to forward in that I do not possess any other information in this situation. I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. BC/mr Attachment wplMemolHouse.Mov • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM 14bW W September 15, 1994 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety FROM: Ricky Black, Training Coordinator SUBJECT: House Moving Detail On Monday, September 12, 1994, I was contacted by Glenda Jaynes and was told that paperwork had been approved for a house to be moved through the city by a moving company. Glenda advised that the movers requested two officers to meet them at the end of Northridge (approx. 1200 block) at 2230 hours. Myself and Officer Jeff Paul met with the movers and at approximately 1100 hours we escorted them down Northridge to Shady Wood and onto Chimney Works Drive. When the movers turned south onto Peytonville, there was approximately a 1-1/2 hour delay due to low trees and the truck getting stuck. Afterwards, we escorted them west on Continental where there was approximately a 2-1/2 hour delay due to them getting stuck on the bridge just east of the elementary school. Upon clearing the bridge, there was approximately a four hour delay due to low trees and the mover's only chain saw had become inoperative. Due to it becoming near school traffic time, I requested Sgt. Moore to contact Public Works and Fire Services to assist with freeing the house. At approximately 0900 hours on September 13, 1994, we escorted the movers into the North Richland Hills city limits and we then returned to the station. I am available for any comments or questions. 6- ," RB/rb CAWPHWEM01\032 t LAJ H t LAJ H I-LAJ H r LHZ) rn r LAJ H SPIN 11 NEIGHBORS 1 Despite our "Play It Again Sam" results with the Mayor and Council last week on the Coventry development, the turnout was FANTASTIC III My personal thanks to all of you who made it happen. We sent a clear message to the Administration that we are together as a Community and when necessary we can field a team that can't be beat! Participation from our neighbors in SPIN 12 and others was also tremendous. Again, I think we demonstrated that artificial boundaries of any sort are meaningless; we are a cohesive group of concerned citizens. ALL THE MORE REASON we need to amass even greater support and turnout for the September 20th. meeting. We have an absolute promise from the Mayor that we'll have a vote on Coventry (barring any more strange tactics from the developer). Please come and get every neighbor across Southlake who shares our concern over runaway growth to come as well. We'll have a larger facility and a better sound system. Let's be orderly so Councilman Franks does not chastise us again. (I hope you all remember that he called our behavior anarchistic when his term is up in the spring). We have developed a comprehensive presentation to oppose Coventry and oppose "Spot" zoning of any sort and focus on quality of growth for Southlake. Unless the Mayor and Council have completely lost their senses, we'll defeat "Coventry" and really begin to have a direct impact on insuring that Southlake continues to be desirable place to live. If you can volunteer to handout fliers, place and remove signs, (in compliance with the sign ordinance) call neighbors or in any way help, please call me, Robin Jones or another of your neighbors and form a team. We'll get materials to you. Also, let's plan now to have an impact on the Spring elections when 3 council seats will come up. If you have any interest in running or want to recommend anyone let me know. Don't try to go it alone. If we pool our talent, resources, etc. around a few qualified and interested candidates, we can win these seats and really have an administration focused in concert with what we, who pay the bills, view as the desirable future for Southlake. Together we must send clear messages to developers and builders that Southlake will not become another Plano and that we'll DEMAND quality in everything that comes into our Community. Thanks again for your support! Ron Maness 420 Ravenaux Dr. Southlake, TX 76092 -- FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH F LAS H City of South lake,Texas MONTHLY ADMINISTRATIVE CALENDARS AND DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1w August 1994 Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-A Community Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-13 Complaints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-C Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-D Municipal Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-E Public Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-F Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-G Street/Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-H Utility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-I Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-J w � rn �1 [- O O O l- O l0 O .--i M r-4 l- 00 .-I M N [- M r-1 -I r"'I U w N M N N 1-4 U) Ql CIl [— 1-1 1-1 1l N zr lw M 1 d' —4 00 to d' to co co E-1 H N cn cnwrn 0 a � W \ rrnM .--1oc� .-f LnNaornM Mto aoLn qwrlr- rlqTr1 to D/ Uco Ln d' M -i N 1n -r m CD —4 a' m' qwM r-1 � cn I 1n N -+ 00 to to :v r fn H M .-I eN HWoh x \ E o H W M , W E•1 rn 'yi 401) d' tDC% 000MO 4100N0 .4 MM dr d' MCV I- cM .-11-4 O A r-I N CV r-1 r•1 In d' (V U) —i to t0 U) M H d� E M �i to to C) Nr N Ch w rn NE 00 N EH I Ix Wa°W Cnn GG � WEo0i O :7 J+ a' C1 -W W) 400d' co _4 MONtOr-1 l- 0 -400 -gra04 -4 - ' •-I r% VI >4 �' A r-I r' M N r, r-4 (,0 00 u) r-I 00 'cN d' CV U) V� 'd' N 00 to 'd' lw M to O0E 0 M � 0 RV UE+ O HWWrn O D+ rn w Z r_I MNO (V ChO Ch � MO Lnd N -4C) -4 -100 a � H N RV • a M 134 l ExCN w � [- M dkCy N 00 0 l0 00 N N 0 N O M U) O O N 0 0 0 qw 04 d' F S .-4 . 4 Ol I- U) U) M a% M cnxqw xEai E 0 r- v1-1NMOr-1 MO C) [� � NvCDw000 Ln N � r- r-1 In z z •• W r>1ib •0) 10 U z .. aa a% W s~ N r—1 4 O ••-1 FJ4 O Jr z 4 O E U E-+ ► 1 z v� •11 $4 1 1 0 U U r-1 •r 1 (x H v� W +-) O •-I r-I a N "1 O ai a •d O A O W H •• r•, to Ul CO Ei b O r1 �' r-1 O W a M O C7 tT Sa U� •r I •r l b) O U 0) $4 --1 W +) H •r 1 U E H cn x � a� NUUC: xZ •a0 •r♦ +J +J OI~ U :J cn H ] E a E H •.I -P 0 �4 P «-I 0 $4 -11 4 P •.•+ m a • cry 1� � x a o4 cn v] W H A to r-+ U UI H U +� \ N r� •l7 W p: • cn O H W U 17 F•� •r1 10 � 4J > O E-i r1 W Uz0zuP Ww Ri a 0a uA uO :a M Ucv wax Ua : MMPNUMU E ;`A-/ r it M 0 0 0 0 O O O M U) O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O) 0 0 0 0 O O O t0 r U) O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O M O Ot N tD Ot n U) O O t` V tD N OD 1� O t0 O N d' O OD . I M Ln -P M M N d H 0 t- O M N IUT 1N ri N M M 4.O d' Ln OD Ln I, Ln OD H d W Ln O O CO ON kD H \ N 00H H V Ot t` V N C4 O In 00 v O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ot o 0 0 0 O O O M O H O O 0 0 H O O O O O O O U" F] co 9 O L 1 4 �O 4 O O N U1 O Ln O M 4 00 O O N M * OD !vT� O Ln t- H 0 ON M H O cn Ln o ,:r ON -;t V' Ln Md'• ON %D W 1 O M am, In OD O V� 00 Go 00 tD N Ot O N H 00 N H M M V1 H 0) N .--4 V U) V' U) U) H tD H (3 N H M H O H D4 \ - ri H V' H U) N O U) .-4 U1 , RH7 O t- en H � H ef� en 0 0 0 O O O 0 M O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O M pn (A O O O O O O O co Ln Ln O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD CYI H H H � 0� N"I O 00 O� 4 OD M 0� O �n O un OD �O No; t: O • •-I i N M t- M H f'n OD N M Ln H H Ot 00 H 0 h O M H Ix H A tD N m O N M O (yi t- In H ri M d' t0 In O 1b W O H OD H o N O M M W to M H tp N U) M a a 10 M 0 0 0 0 O O O t- O to 0 o 00 OOOOOOOON O l Ho 0 0 0 0 O O 0 -O M O O O O O H O O O O O O O H 1y' tD O) 4 98 () O n O O O U) O U) U) O M N M , 4 V1 A O H N N Ot N H tD tD M H .-1 H V d' In. ON O) tD t- M O 0 a' H OD OD V� 0 V* co M O -;r V• 1n H (V) t` N N N H t0 04 [� Q . O 1 O M In M U1 N H dD H H M H N H 44 `M V' d' (IN t` V' tD co H �J H H OM) 0 0 0 0 O O O tD O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o t0 V W O O rTi O O O O 0 0 0 N O U) O O 00 00000000r. Ot M Ut o tD M O 14 O O U) 4 10 Ot N 9 L11 tD N H N O O H V t` tD M r- N H H H O aH V' v to M t` V t0 V v H tD N ICZP H co H H Ln 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H o 0 0 0 00 OOOOOOOOH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U) U) O O 99 O O 99 0 0 99 N H O� N O t` t` N H tD O 0) O) tD H P tD N t` H tD H N 0) tD ON V' Olt H a U1 t- In OD OD a0 t0 U) t0 r- U) H 03 N M O O 1 H U1 tD H Ot 0 0 0 0 O O O tp U) O O O 00 OOOOOOOOH O o 0 0 0 0 0 U) N U) 99 99 O O O O O O O O M d' VI O) N tD tD r- N M O U) V t` O O O O 00 H N H (y H U) H w M O H O N w 0 H H v U) M H N Ot M Cl) V' N r- N t- H N U) CD O H t- H tD M Ot U) H H 0) tD H H H � H z z ai w rn 'Cf H 01 z ri ppqq 4 C: 4 \ oo ppi jj AID N4 >1z4o H U O' Hz w I t o v H �+ a a 1zI M 1� V1 41 0 o H H a N H L' m 14 1F.73 H • .-1 o to to id E 0 0 •14 (d H o w a � t7 0.11 m -A --I (3t O � 0 0 $4 1 p4 V •-1 •14 U H H 8 V] z a 4J C1 U U R x -I q -A .N 4 O a 0 O W H A H H -.I M U $4 $4 -A $4 •-1 4 $4 «4 N $4 • OD a V� x a f� to H to U Gl N H +) \ N H • L> tU a V1 H W U a to 1 w �c E E •-+ 1 u14I 0 O H ••i uz8zt, 0% MA >4 P4a H m 41 E E •A 4 ooaa to a cd H E �a�77 m 8 0 0 x z z O H E•1 to a) c 000izttaW04w 0 a)0 Uac0i � � v cQnHN0t` 0 t M 0+ o o o 0 o o 0 o o o o o o o u \ 00000000000000 to 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . H O N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N O P4 1 M m o o o o O O o 0 0 O In 1` M F N .-4 n Ho MOW O O M H O r-4 H M d (!� Of . . . . . . O t0 O N O (E,71 H a0 co to M N M to O% O O O O O 00 o O O O O F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O f co CN D ul O to of U u1 O O (J [� to N N 1- 1- m t` N N N in D to w to O H In w H m O O H R . N t- V' 00000000000000 1 d' d' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w+ M j80% to \ N V' o O O O In O O O O O o ff M 0% H N ONHOOOWOOMOOOW to Ot P4 O d- Z H H N t- H Ot H O O M H V N to I . 0 O t0 V' to N t0 M N M m N t0 H N m V' 1n r to O to t0 0) t` o t0 Ot C1 co H .-1 Ln [� O, t` O V' Ut N d' .-1 M Ot , M N H F l� �I \ N O% (I N I- O d' N H N FQ O H O N d N 1 H (H9 m .i O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a d' +i O to O to O 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 1n O1 00000000000000 tL O NONOO oo ro m m " WEc M 00000000000000 0) 1` V to 0� tov vn tr t- N %0 m {17 01 H O O O O • O O O O O O O H O � H H -* rn000 000000mm to 1 1-1 d 04 cn EA a . . . . O H 1` In. . . . N coco00 N N coH O h 0% N ON HNO H 8 Ot , O I w Ot (o M to H to tom m0 H 0% O '� H H Ol to .-I O N co t0 t� .i p %0 0% O T O N N t0 t- 0 O N 0 W >4 oo rl N d' 4J o to t0 M N M M M M M M N to %o n U .-I Ln p00000000000000 0 Q 00000999999000 >40 Ot N V' OOOOMO 0000 .-I M F Z Ot O N to 0 0' O M O 00000 N H H m m o M t0 O h O co %o M t- co Io U H 4 1 O .1 O . O N In . O to Ot In M a. co 0 to H 0 O d' N M to V' M M H H H Q H N to N In N O rl N H O1 A w O W H N co M In a s >+ too, F a+ aww >• w M M F Z O-1 U a m >4 z pa C 0'1 a C cU 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 1) w a h h twn H 99999999999999 OMi O OO OO O V' Ot M 0 00 O OO OO O t` d N O co 10 O O N O O 10 NLn .�.-' M .i N In H In 1n M v N v V H to N O M t/FF,4 0 t0 M N M rn r] O+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V. v 0 0 0 O 0 O to d' H M N 0 0 0 M O co to .-1 to 1 0 .-I O O M N to O H t` F H -0 H M O IA V IO to to 4 f/� z >4 ,t' m t0 .4. t� d' N rl to ` Ian O H H 00000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 N (n N N 0 0 0 O O O O ao 0 V' O d' to H 01 r O N O M O to O t0 t- co a0 H Z O0 D 0� O t0 O n O O to O tb H 0 r1 v t` V' Ot M N M to H N V H C1 O V Ln .� z H z vi Na rzzW zH H c E+ to 0%b 0% \ \ O U Z C m Iola 3 41 x to H w o cri Id rC H 0 '1 14 V) to 0 Et a � 0 H 6. \ M z 4 O F H z U to 1� to I I o a C] H w z ro F m 0 >,HHa, a D a a H atr o H M O t 4 $4 a to o •a O Ol o 1T F H zO P4 Vz z R 0 m V U w 0 to H D H z z to F Hq7 w H -4 u m f-I p +4 a A x a M to qH7 w 0) C09 M a 14 0 � & i 4 g z zM H H H M D 00 tD 0 04 0 0 0 3U94 wxa ►+ ¢ 0 Ma M a UUztotnFk. 0 V) H M 17�-.3 City of Southlake,Texas COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING 31 AUGUST 1994 ZONING $ 2,330.03 NO. OF CASES (8) PLATTING 7,180.00 NO. OF CASES (12) SPECIFIC USE PERMITS 343.56 NO. OF CASES (1) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 500.00 NO. OF CASES (5) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 338.40 NO. OF CASES (46) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUE $ 10,691.99 TOTAL NO. OF RECEIPTS (72) CAWPFIREPORTS\RE VNU-94.08 JC./ GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended August 31, 1994 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended August 31, 1993 (fiscal month 11 -91.67%) Revised Percent Actual Percent 1993-94 Year to Date Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 8/31/94 8/31/94 Expended 8/31/93 9/30/93 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $2,175,000 $17,623 $2,168,235 99.7% $2,118,765 $2,144,650 98.8% Sales Tax 865,000 94,158 743,407 85.9% 534,052 636,737 83.9% Franchise Fees 398,125 12,927 400,036 100.5% 294,623 305,909 96.3% Fines 232,400 29,872 213,920 92.0% 163,673 182,271 89.8% Charges for Services 63,545 1,807 50,001 78.7% 52,561 59,086 89.0% Permits/Fees 1,562,020 151,857 1,485,081 95.1% 1,134,840 1,251,287 90.7% Miscellaneous 36,175 1,818 28,886 79.9% 26,020 44,846 58.0% Transfer In-Other Funds 159,446 0 0 0.0% 0 159,446 0.0% Interest Income 90,000 7.925 93,629 104.0% 61,509 54,194 113.5% Total Revenues $5,581,711 $317,987 $5,183,195 92.9% $4,386,043 $4,838,426 90.7% EXPENDITURES - City Secretary $219,000 $24,076 $187,422 85.6% $125,433 $143,026 87.7% City Manager 193,025 22,336 179,909 93.2% 132,105 152,073 86.9% Support Services 634,380 35,861 548,056 86.4% 408,879 502,644 81.3% Finance 256,090 25,891 236,434 92.3% 181,362 205,844 88.1% Municipal Court 167,183 17,982 140,915 84.3% 127,854 144,786 88.3% Fire 723,144 67,764 594,859 82.3% 491,795 566,832 86.8% Police 1,028,989 104,881 952,841 92.6% 788,810 895,343 88.1% Public Safety Support 440,210 66,054 389,332 88.4% 323,320 357,268 90.5% Building 259,491 30,223 239,600 92.3% 139,040 154,005 90.3% Streets/Drainage 1,441,301 242,985 1,189,139 82.5% 686,956 857,494 80.1% Parks 226,522 13,295 180,894 79.9% 120,255 138,224 87.0% Public Works Administration 126,233 14,052 119,910 95.0% 58,115 102,064 56.9% Community Development 293,312 27 777 233-648 79.7% 217,796 234,170 93.0% Total Expenditures $6,008,880 $693,177 $5,192,959 86.4% $3,801,720 $4,453,773 85.4% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($427,169) ($375,190) ($9,764) $584,323 $384,653 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Proceeds from C.O. Sale(net) $565,827 565 827 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenditures • 1 8 658 %5556 063 %584323 . 384 6 3 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $1,405,310 $1,405,310 $1,125,708 $1,125,708 Net-Reserved for encumbrances 0 0 105,051 105,051 ENDING FUND BALANCE $L543.968 191.961373 S I-604.980 S 1.405.310 Ln i w w o � a A H z H a a Q i 1 1 1111 1 11 i 1 1 WW OWMOWbonen 000 b Ln o00 o Lo-0mo oM000bbv00000000 00 E N U b M b ri b N O coW Ln M O O O M O O O M O W V O O W V rL V 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 00 O ;V;,; v -1NNb W N 00 00 O 0Lv M0LN V LnO UI W W Ln C;C;C; bO UL a NOW mf 4UtN v f1N coL b WN ovv (n b co v Ln aL M 0 l-N r r O N O v b co H O Ln Wa A N.a W L'i110 v Mrty ULN ON1(1 .iIzL UL W rnvLnl` M UtM z V M rl. N b co 00 00 U1 M Ln N v W V aL N rl .h r1 r1 N N .i .-4 Q W W O O O O O U l O 0 0 L n 000 0 O L n 0 o U L 0 0000 00 00 00 H� 00000rlmmrl" 000 00 O O sp V O 00 00 U0 OU z 00000 N%0140 rl OVV O Ln ooU O W OolM On OL LA .-1 rl HA OO UL W nM N L(1 W oNN UL N Ln Iz1 V aL Nr O ri r M E W m en Ln b b eL r ./M M M .-1 M i b Ln O N U).d Ln m a CL rd co N v N N co .i r, W rl M W « A # .7 .4U1rb OLno co Ob NLnN O V 0 00a M r/11M V nO b M UL n i4 van # A 0w m ao 000 a%0 a% moLm 0 r, 0 min W a%Ornrn 00% 0%b MU1 a\n # an .-L .4 r/r1 ri r1 ri H ri rl 0 M rl W H 1-1aL EI xaoo o Q E a .1 1 W .i O Daz H zx 1 OWHE zzM 0 oNno"Womwo rfor1 b Lnoo Lnb oM000 vbbo0000000 00 W M0 at M 0100 bCL N V 00 W U 14M00000 W 00 00 A # b V Mb V D\W nn W r/W 01 W 4U)U1 00 MN a O # J "M.4 0 W N N N b P d'L-.-1 LD .i N VL Ln 0 b b W"Ln O M-T aL N P M O N a1 C M M O H U « N W.-Lv co MbHOb bN aL 0 a1N r0 corn UL U1 co OnLn nnObM V L�i N av, « U . . . _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . . . . _ . . . . . W H « OMM b LnN U1 rl r1NM U1 M OO W N V 0;V O Nr a1 rl MN a 6. 0.a Ln v LD v t` 111 rt rt rt N rt U1 O r1 v.-I o N Ln Ln .11 0 11 r N M N N r H r1 E N M H H� i U zO b N 0 n N V O V O O 00 O O O O O U 1 b 0 0 0 0000 O W p V W U1 it a% b W O co o O Ln in co o 0001�No 00 0000 0 H U NU100n LD M U W b b b .o n V'rI I MLnN V N W O o 000 0 L.7 M aL Ln N 0 N N 00 La.n N co O aL UL r1 N M M N co W LnaL aL r1 0 M v b U V Mrl 01 n bN W U1 ri O W V HNNM co naL V ri Nri n o v a N v a1 aL H 17 rt aL r1 W N U1 i b rl rq aL ri N N N Ln rl rl rl y w�MzIn w w z zzz z p U oEn En win Ca7HLn0 C7 (n z Dw Lwa zzW =114 frA�7. w Ln W w tn> W 0w 0u woL-IOH p iz a a ww H fnfa 1*4 1 �Har7 >oaU ,eG. UHa H W aw yW UW{0.0Q' oy UoA oNw w�a'aUU L�H0 ap4 aas LUrQ �FH"I H Cod p� W Nov m ul z uQH C7E W M V a' kL C7 1% W Mza W N989 a�W as HDa(�OMO OLa W A S.T. 1 1 1 1 1 E zQ W a oo WW �i z W wwr�W W W w W G.a in W HH to EOty in a ao om ao asa W x in 9 Ui UL aU1 xQW W E 0.ia��11 A'i y y y Nw 5 wU ux A'iaa WUWU' aH H i 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i 0 A FQ�IQ�HHxxxxx W Lao FL�L�p41M W HHHFNHEHEEEEHEHNHEHE W ML�L�]N 'pT�Uy4L'(ZuULLLU'�Q�u'pT�U�w ztoHL\��jL Q W (1H,H,�H.,3Hj,FH,`pyH':,TH,,TH,Hy Hj,QTHG,H�Hj 2H;H,HH�Hj Hj WQH •q,q•,ro z�W W W W a~wH u.ff.FF��Ha�i�J' Mµµ�� aaa W W W W W W W W W WwW WW W z Ltaain w E aELv a'iQ5~CinaMN a s aaaaaaaaaWaaaaWaaaa o O o E4 z .-1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00000000 O rl N M V 0 0 0 o r1 0 0 ri 0 0 0.4 0 0 W 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000 'j. O O.iN C; aI rL 14 V U1.4 N 0 O O O O O U1N M.-IN 4v; r10M V OOr1 NM V V�Lnb bl�W aL aL r-1 LLjV O./ri"'1"q N N NNN 14 ri OOOON N U1 L, rl rl.-4 ri.-1.4.-4.-1 rL.i.i.i rl r1 r1 r1 r1 NN rl rl 1-4 rl r1 rl r1 11 rL ri N N M M M M M M M M V'V'V'-W V V'V'V V'V'V'an aT V V V V'V-W s v m U1 ri \ N O1 I W W (9 F � .t a A H z 114 I 1 a W W o 9- 0 000 044 U1 o (n 0 O O OD O ri H N N v a WF MU vaDv0 vcha 000 .+o n 0 ooOD o 0 o nn v v O of a a o o.r v M m a n m o Oo co M in a ONMO %0%0%0 nM ODM n oU100 v v NN H ri WW n 0 U)H CO 0%%0 N 01 v .-/ %0 N v V %0.o Uf In ppzz�� .-i ri.r n e�i en 1; Ln .i n m m ll ni oD Co a n in Ut ON m H ri M M A W W 000 000 00 otn O O 00 Ln %0 n M oo W co H'J 000 000 ON On O O OOn V' N n 00 M M z 000 U1 O O cc O N v co 10 r1 ri v 00 N 0 0 W U1 U)V U1 v 0 W O N O H M O O 00 N N F H M n •-I%0 v b N .-4 M Uf N 00 a%M O 0 M 1 ri H n co M M W ri b �p tV ri v U1 aI v 00 UI M N OD O co to O O N v v v c D4 a dP a1 of n aI O% 0 a% n H m M OD v co 0 co 00 of a1 O1 n k dp .-I N 00 O A Fa aac�H °f.az pyI 1 M z z O W o M�o O 000 000 Ln o n o 0 o N m a+ Ln Ln %D %0 N v H In o V'ri H 0.i OD O N O 0014 0% 0% n n U1 Ul A k to O 0 O O UI UI O N H O-U1 co 10 10 00 00 tV N W O� k 'J 00 n%0�0 O %0 M m M n w OD H 01 N O V'co N N N N N N O H U # E� n 01 V'.-1 M O M N O Ul M M I0 O OD 00 CO It It O O a'M # U W H # A %O.-I O N Ch ri M Ln v .i N 00 0 0 of m v v ri M n ri O%0 v co .-I ri N N N at 0% O O N H a n n rn rn E H H U z O v 0 N O N 0 01 O O O O v v N N a%LnH 00 O O O O 00 ri H �D n N n M 0 O n O 00 O O UI Ul Ul U1 ri ri%0 OD%0 v U1 In 00 M 0 H N N 00 W f l n It 00 N H N O 00 .-I I0 OD 0i 0i Oi ai m I+1 W of v V0 14 .� .� n n Ln r- rni H M M pq a M z W A z W z H M U z N H N H Z EA ZH H 1-i HH aN H W U M HA M W D D x 0,4 M W IA G.a 2E U W F Z to k. Ei sCW0zz to H MW H x x �W XW0 WM E A Z G. Ua M pyH0Hp 0rA MN E-1ZUM0 NHa1H pp zM W W �7 UU W U' A40OH9 (7(.�w O 40 AH W k. EM a' .CM W z0 HW►]HfL� WA HHA 0 (30 r�04 AAza Ei A W W r4r3H�iQOHUMQ sZCPwG MHZW z rL.Nus UW UW 7�z Of z W A zEi{1,HWWaHU081A t.7LY. �IWG4G�Ht9HW O Hw 00� F a p Z `°H a H �l ,C pp W0HW µa�.l7 psq rye U' M M a �*I O MO�C�OHZz0.2UM WHUHVDH zNa 1.a3D�7 aHO a'R w A t] 14 NMH W Mw([µ�i�F U WzHz(ayl��µw1� ODO.t�olia W E-4HP4Ck 9 W w W W W W W W r4z HOC V1 V1 VI tl1 VIMMMMM Nai vvi O W x.A'1 N"M HHH Z z awwwwwwwwwc°�w azzzzzzzzzzzzz o8�sH0 ra HH o H - ra U oop00000000 0000000000000 00000 0 W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O O o 000000000000000 0 O 0000000 000 o H1 z m N M v U1 10 n of 0�OHO V' 0 N O ri N M Uf.o n OD Of O O H 0 n Ul 10 O n 01 0 m O H :3 O N NNNNNNN MMv O ri ri ri.•1 ri ri r'Iri ri"MM ri ri N N10 .-I Hv 44 v vvvvvv vvvv In Ln Ln Ln U1 o U1 U11n o Ul N 1n nnnnn O% a a \ rn w a d W LO pp pp m�p �t O W O O N�C 1 ON!O b"! OWi ^tn"i1% Oa.O 1m9 ON�O M��d' N OWO�OW1 It r U 1p �p . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z ��V'tan 01 Oa1-r n 1D O.a-1 a.�-•M 00, .m-� O0%MM NNO O,�N N 01.-r NN�10 eM-� In CIC Q O In O M 1D In N N 10 f\M rl 1D r1 M 10 N f\01 N f•1 N O O1 N N.-• 1D m to N M ti 10 N .M-1 •-� .�• .M-1 N m U, Of at M f/1 N OD O d W of Z QJ Or pO O O(m(O�O O O O m O O O O O O_O m 1n O O O O O O O O O O O 1n 0 0 0 Co 1n O Z C O O 1OO C0 to C •m1tC O � m m 1D�M O NNN 1OnC N.-1 O f Imo.^-1 M1mD M 1mD N O Z d In In 00101 W.-a 011 ON N co nN en aO 011D OO� to a m.--�ON 10 1- 10 Q N ti CDN.-1 .-1 M ti N 1D 01 N N m O f\ m .m-1 tD N d d �p # O O W n0O1 i�W O W.m-1 (O ONi OMi N.M�OO�D.^i OM1 CAD cD��ON1O0O1M ta0 aD OO1T nOf Oa10�i 0O1 ON1 — .-. .-. .-. + a� + r t � # o C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t W Y Wad° + d Q�\10 # m J OWC M.-y r� 2 H W 0 Z 1 w r O O z r d z x Q� O W O r W O O ^•V O1 In O�t f\ %r W O N n•+10.-+ In W 1 D N a N m O N to O1 M 10 f\.--1 O a O1 O V i Z Y J O N M O N M M-: .9 O M N 0 10 1�01--t I n N M 1 n-�r 1 1 n 0 1 n 01 C W # M O O —W 1, MtnN m W N mmNa pp1�10pp m M.--1 O 0I�.--1 W In 13 1D W W OaN W.--1 m pp p J # r O O In V'In e t 0 10 1� N 6 01 m N a et O a 0 01 0 0 0 0 1 1 n 1 n I�N W O 1 W M O(•J O Q # U O O %Z 1 D V a N O 10 It M I n 1 AA 10 01 t� Ili 1 n O W W 1 n N N 1� O a M M a N M a O Hu 4 Q to 1n 1p M.�-1 a m1n CDf\ f\N In 01 .M-1 N O1 ti N M I,CD 1- M O ID N 10 n 10 In in 0 D N N N W � 1` N a,M O O a V' V U')t O M U d l + n N T\ + r x r d x w + O O I O M O O t O a 01 N t p O O to N 0 0 a In<t N t\V] f M 0 0 1 n 1 n.-+d D I O O W O 1 U J O HU . O Nmp1n.ON.M..O 0..1 O M- O. I`. O Cl!O I%OO n 19 f• M W W 00 010 0. 0. O1 M.0 0 0. 19 LO ^ MM WM N mm IA N L v4Mi ln N(7 O . . . W W. Q a N .-+ M N 011 .+ N N M•--1 O 1n fm7 2 1n N C r-1 C r-1 Of En O W VI W (n O W VI O W _ W Z O W Z O W Z O N W Z O O r N M W N M W N U W M W Z Z r t W a- /Znn x W d uZl # W 1Zn d LZn # W d NZZ # 1dr 1 ti IxW O f W O k U CSx O W O 1 1U-1 K W O t U 0= N t S W In U Q Y f J S W U¢Y¢ # S W�+ to U Y¢ f S W U QQT # J Q N fn k 0 W N N J�] t U W N H J J # U W N Q 1n S J J i W N 1WS-1 J J i W Z # W I n J Z 1Q¢-1 W QZ r k Z I n J Q ZW Q r # 1 n J(ry Z rQ W r # V 1 J a WZ r t ww7 O d J J W 1 n X K g UZ J U W H V 1 0 0 0 J O W 1=-m f n X d'ZQU J V I W H V f K d QJ W Q Q Z U W W r Z N J Q\ Z U W r 2ZZ N J Q Z U O W W r Z N J Q W Z U W r ZZ r r V I W V 1 Q r M .7�Q J 1 n W V 7 Q r V I •�. W J O C Z r W H O J 2_C 02 ppz JOC 2rQQ oW Qr 00 (). K Z_!Q-oW F- O- `�Zff{//QWn�� Cgs pK VVVIII Zp Lg� C> T O 1. 1 U I=n O Y 1 W OO U d U N 5 Y 0 U MO d O-,N O Q m W O N OS d U V) M.<Q.1 O 8 O 0 m O O p Op O Cl O p Op O N O O O O O o O C. O O O OC.O C.O O O ~g �O O CD O O ppO CD O 1- CM UZQ W 1 n O O a In 1OD W 001 W.r-1 N-r 1OD 1 W U W N I`n a 100 100 co m W? N a l D I CO G 1 W Z O U O U _ 0 1 n O LL a O1 N O\i W C7 a a w p m N M 0 f 0 C> O 1 U)O I O t O 0 U)0 0 0 Q O 1 M to 0 f 0 10 10 U)ID-W 1 .'+f b n b W MM MOd'S ISO O MO cm Cntool— n UO OD n ON . �O O.,r�M Of O! r% Z ZUZQ to Nra NCO f� 1� �O MI,U1 k001%6 co M .�Of N 1�0100 u7 I� O Ma er t0 t0 N01 1� W) J f0 P,.�01.-f 0 t0 N O N.-t of 0 0 N N CD .-�N N m .� n u3 O L) N Ln M e 0f f� �O K J O��.-�•.-C N l00 MNNMN O C N 01 aMN ct.�_lc O� O�MM1�1�Nwi OW) iD f� coQ CO O.ti N M t0 U).ti N CO M co M Uo O1 N CD t0 N MCY O CL W CC Z pQ 1� p m S �p j OOP ti M O S M 0 S S[D C D I�C l I D S W C O M f D (h ci l c N M O 1 l C m S N S ZZg cn U') t0 �'� e-� NN Q1 ^ MOQ eQ-� NbNn co �N f01 NM�N O^1 Q 10Q' � CL # Q cli cli CD e{ m1O ttpp pp pppp S 001 CD1MOtOOn LO m CA U)CD CD fO- N CD al 10 cli n01 OM1 001 W 01 CD cli n W 01 k CO ti # A' k K t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O * M 999999 . O 999999999 O 99 .99999 O 999999999 O O Q cc\UJ k m J CC MF- x H co ca m W r o O z f O W m m t a z x �Q O W O H W N I 0 0 V O .--� to 0 M O ct O U)N O 0) 01 10.-1 1 1D�.--1 O � Kr U)g O1 N f")01 M Q M V' V) Z Y J 10 CT 10 0 N 0 ."1 f0 0 0 01 19 a O W O1 eM d' M.-1 N O f O1 M O N 1O 0 O1 N.--�CD O Cl! CD C W t 011� <a NCD U) ON to N at M a C . Of N CD NO O1.7� V 1D fO CD MM 01O N O W 88 oQpJ t F- �M OCO N 0.1 r-1 m 1 !m U)m rCD U) O11 w wmmO M M c{mwC --' wCD M a k U n NMM O1 O Md'Nqrbn CD CO b V)U) U)W f0 CO w O NCD U) pli nQ M N O W U f Q . . . . w . . w �-ce V) # U)f0.-a 1 Cw Ow f0 O1.--1 N O1 R R U)N M N Ol m 01 CD Q Kr N N O1 O1 .-1 Kr N V) N N CD Y\ t H # W f �O N 000 .�i O10 OMN OtO CDO O Q10 cm Ol�I�U)O � .M-t Ocf KrC) I�O1 ct U J UJ M.--.000O Cl! M O O OO Cl!U)O 10000 10 N O O N cf O NU)1- C1 01 Cp U)n U)f0 UJ a O1 10 I�N 9 pppp N f Ol N N n V' U) U U)U)N cma 01 .� 'd' O O I� V 10 O1 CD CD CO O M V U)N-7 O1 O a0 Q n .^-1 N.-t 10 CA N.--t O .M-1 10 N Zcn L'ip ZO w W O r-t M CC =3 HQ2' 7 1QQC- Z p W Z O W Z O W Z O W Z O W!4U W V,U W N U W V)U W V l CL VZZ7 IZZn C1. NZZ i W r-I CL VzI # W ti VZI Cl (ZZn t W IOL S H rU-t o>C W O # .U-. O W O # H C W O k .U-1 K O W O CJ 9x >W U Y # >W.-+ V) U Yjj R >W V) UZZ Yjj k >W.--1 V) U Y R ppp > Z Q O J ~QQ UZ_ t J d HQ U O * J 7 1¢~¢ZU 0 0 t J d~a U J k Q J J W H N�[K 6�--t J W H C C V)X K ZQ S J 7 W C9 U W H Z V I cJ Q Z U� v O� 22 O Y dCJ{=/fQC�.C3 0t0.) In O 0.0 o� o1=if0 $&� oNo-aiNO �t4i �M�Q� a ;m@ C-li D01 dj O N f']C10O tOO�CD 001 dK —N�fOO tOO�C0001 dpJ NM�tOO10�00001 w U In U O LL 0 0 O d a 01 M Y\) Ol O1 W C9 Q d O+O n t0 n 10 t0 O M O O O O O O O S y to n N n 0 0 O OD 1 Of t0 V 01.-! N tNO N 10 C> W to 0.+y Cn to 10 n O O O C O O O O O O m N1n 1nN e1 O • •m �D to t� � r 1n r1 CT NCOOM NM CO tY J Ol ��ONO m O �10 to CIA 1�M BO O t0101�N N O M O y t 0 M O NItM n 10 0' m .r.--� O .M-1 tY.N-1.-� 10 y.-a O N CD Of.-9�r 10 n n to LO a pd cm 6 W [Y Z J F- to O�On O p O O w)y O O O O O O O O op O o Op O O O ppO p O cp, pp �c{p, n Lpmnp.--�Cl O Cl.r CD N O j.Q-1 � W W n Nco a, O V COM 1n N O to O M M t0 tN0 b O I--t 1N r^-1 2dQ N M .+N O.-+ Ot acn.ten -* OCOO Nunn Ob MO 10 01 QK N tiMn M � b 4 nN .-1.yN t0 N O1 d Q ((�� pp pppp o # CD M to Cl�ltl'101 Of(M 01 01 io CD to C4 0000000 CD01 CD CO.y'1 MC00 n to co co CO 100 co��00 CO W O # wR : w oogog$oo g 00000�o 0 000g$oogoo 0 00000000 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ]L W�d k K Qd�10 # CO J ccM H S a co O Z t W -O _ O Z = CC�D 1 0W.Z 2 [Y O X ZZ H O n M at p 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Q O O1 a n N N M <N O.r Ln t0 M N V' ct O yY W YQ a O.-1 O�tn V' N CD CO O MUYOCO 01� n y y pdop J 1=-- N Ot!MO vi en V'01 O ti�tgO gN y Km m Ot0 NOt tO mt0 M M p W S U # Q Of y n CD N M CD . r m.--1 O w .�i N t0 m a y u)t M t0 f 01 co Ici .-+CV N 10 O1 O1/� On Otn M n Of to 10 V .-1N0f Of O1 101n-M co n to 1001 Ot �1�10M V'CTNN O co co M .M1 N y N .M-1 m colO.--I er y C9� mU d l i t N H # W t O O O O O O O O 1 n-0-1 n CD O M Cl CO In O m W O C% O M 1 O M O 1 V O O N.--1.--1 O O M O O O O O O O O C T O.--1 O M O N O 1 O 1 n N 1 n I 1 f%O 19 C 0 J pmp CC�0 CCpp OQ O 1�01 V.--1 CO C7 10n tF CO <�f0 CD OOt.M-1 Oy1 tO0N1�0 0�1 1Nn H7 ChM �M01 f�C3.--1 N M f V N N N O M N O.--1 C O O l N 10 O t O 1 1 n 47 M 1 n N N N M N O Q ~ O M N 10 N W O tMo to cm Z W Z O W KW w Z O - yU W W U W WtiO O CW y Z d y W y W- d y k W O 7 Q >Z X 4 U> X # U_>Z X Z } M> K t M [WJY O tZo UCQQJ QH t}t KWd' Ln W Wo W CyH y w tW WUy y Wy Q E WW to>;yJ ZQ Z W[>Y H # O 1n W H U Z� k Q W H Z� k � Q 1-1 W F�U Z �J d QQ ZZ OO J� L L QQ O ((�� J�J d¢¢ZZa OOO J� [1 QQ ZZ H J W H m y X C Q J W H y X C J Z W H lb fn X K Z r1 J W H y X C Q.--1 J Q W (, ddOW WHZyJ Q ZZZ¢U¢WQZHZ JZUOW WF- yJ Q ZZ(q,�W_WF-w QW cC W JOC2H W 1Q- O OCJ[Y Z_W Fac- 00 Nc �W JLl'Z¢H W H¢ O pJCY ZI--W la¢- 00 O Ya0 �cs dZS t=i�Ocs aM,� cSa��NO�S�e3 � tOi�O �c� aZ d �Q pp pp pp p o pp 8 _ p pp S p tn p a C3 CS Q N O O O 91. O N t to 100 01 W O ti N M Q to 100 CD OOi W .O-1 N R 10n 100 CO 001 W a O w O d O(A O d a rn w D_ W r p w e{M O O O to to Ot to b N r` O N O t. fO COO�O.-t 01 Ot O.ti MCOO tits Of M 2 UTj Ll CD O- Orb N tO�'- �C)I N OM M CT O f N CDn m N O t n M n t 0 b O t D CX Q. N Q N M N n M b{D et n r`b b 01 m M In V a, ti I = co S W K Z J r m 0 0 0 0 0 0 M n to 0 0 0 0 0 .Ni Q M b O OM OM Y Y O O M b N 0 0 0 t 1 n Z7Z7 O t C 1 V' N N t O ti t O t N 0 M N b a_ D. b Q k p 01 NYC . C- ISM tl'1 .-+M bMObp k O b O a,Go O1 01�co co co x m x d' « p OOOOO CD-O O OOOOOoO o O W O Y W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 O 'D # W Q b W� W m J 7\O t Q m r CU pZ 1 W r m _ O Z W p W b1�OOO�et bet tDON O M O l m O O l t n b K # 7 t .-- g O M O M V N N C T M fD O O J # r b r` O N t0 b n b N b O to at tD t+-CD Q # U IN N M N b CT li b b C0 t[)� b Cl O Wr-tU # Q Q W N # rl O CO 01 40l'1 M N M.N-�b.^-� IM+7 U d li # •--i N M r d k W # r p O m C.O O t o n 0 0(V O C O M O M In U J O QO O r`O 01 b Uf UC .�-t to O f! tD pQ .b-� tf! �� C> �r Nbb !� b fr N V M CD .^i 0Of N~0, n U b wwcr O O Z ice- K r C p W Z Zp W Z p S n C W O # U W Zp N k 4 J Q N N N¢> ZJ k W N 'Iuj Q J J k Z # p I.-N X D C ZQ U O S J W N X C S J O J (,7 Q W WrZNJ Q Z2 QU W W rNJQ QJ a OC JOC Z F w-W H O ODC JD_'Z W rZpZo_w.gp.Qz_tp6p�''.. JKlrZpzaw.-+up..a¢+ rw r CDpY UNO YD.0 �O dUNO �J tOY C0 CJ O O O O O p O O 33U O O O OC.O o O O Z Qr N�N-DD�W OOf W j �N r bODa W z C3 U CITY OF SOUTHLAKE WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended August 31, 1994 and August 31, 1993 (fiscal month 11 -91.67%) Revised Percent Actual Percent 1993-94 Year to Date Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 8/31/ 4 8/31/94 Expended 8/31/93 /9 30/93 Expended Water Sales-residential $2,700,000 $397,401 $2,283,136 84.6% $1,946,099 $2,294,377 84.8% Water Sales-commercial 510,000 44,218 415,526 81.5% 368,017 438,097 84.0% Sewer Sales 360,000 38,916 331,735 92.1% 208,525 237,213 87.9% Sanitation Sales 335,000 29,025 309,577 92.4% 268,466 296,252 90.6% Other utility charges 337,500 38,872 334,526 99.1% 283,609 297,391 95.4% Miscellaneous 56,600 141 54,110 95.6% 55,276 75,380 73.3% Interest Income 65,000 7.927 65,916 101.4% 30,811 30,118 102.3% Total Revenues $4,364,100 $556,500 $3,794,526 86.9% $3,160,803 $3,668,828 86.2% EXPENSES Water $2,478,425 $239,856 $1,603,211 64.7% $1,221,417 $1,879,712 65.0% Sewer 688,921 159,795 651,400 94.6% 395,265 428,582 92.2% Sanitation 304,500 25,758 251,807 82.7% 215,537 263,050 81.9% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 81,895 0 81,901 100.0% 79,719 79,719 100.0% Other-Line Oversizing 25,000 0 19,713 78.9% 3,072 24,072 0.0% Transfers-other funds 269,613 0 110,167 40.9% 107,849 267,295 40.3% Total Expenses $3,848,354 $425,409 $2,718,199 70.6% $2,022,859 $2,942,430 68.7% Net Income/(Loss) $515.746 %131.091 $1.076.327 $1.13T944 $726-398 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST 1994 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR 8/31/94 7/31/94 8/31/93 ACCOUNTS BILLED: WATER $458,439.98 $389,331.34 $481,920.84 SEWER 39,138.92 37,639.21 28,691.64 GARBAGE 29,083.89 28,813.97 26,026.99 SALES TAX 2,247.52 2,225.33 1,878.84 OTHER 3,395.00 2,291.22 3,942.74 TOTAL $532,305.31 $460,301.07 $542,461.05 NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS: WATER 3,783 3,714 3,142 SEWER 1,478 1,440 997 GARBAGE 3,500 3,459 3,131 TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED: 4,017 3,950 3,382 NEW CUSTOMERS: (increases for the month) WATER 67 81 48 SEWER 38 59 55 *GARBAGE 41 79 46 TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED 67 78 48 CONSUMPTION BILLED (IN 000'S): WATER 111,581 95,129 130,700 SEWER 56,221 45,177 50,518 *Beginning 6/94,all builder accounts will not be charged garbage. They are unable to utilize service while homes are under construction,because most solid waste is building materials. Once home is occupied by homeowner,garbage will be charged. a a \ M a i W w a Q H z N WW M0Or.40 oN 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln H N U N Vm a% NO00%Ln00 01n O-w 00 OD •, 1n In Qµ' N O 1:01 44 Of a;V'V'M .i O; 1l1 O; 1n un M M I,.-4 O CO w r,%D N%D co N •-1 r4 .i m .-4.-4 r, r,V'O[a� N v CD Ili l Nn V' N L v 0i ON 0. Ln o WW r1 N %o Vw.i r/00 Ln Ln .i o1 N N �D kD ID w In 1n Ln Q W W 0000 0000000 00 00 00 O O Hp 0000 0000000 00 00 00 0 0 ooww o00000Ili- oo roll oo .a II N 14 Ln %D c ow000m 00 .-IN Ln Ln -w -wH Ln Ln 0.i It M w a M N N -w %o%o %D W y N M m N M M W N @ V V W # A M r,Ln%o In 1-4.i M N w N o•-/ N P .i-4 Ih I- A( p dp # y Ln 0%%D 0n co OD O O m 00 0h 00 t-OD 00 m co El a, H x 9 O A H a .� W ., 0 tD a 0 H zx 1 °oc z y'z.z W 0 tD%A•4 r`N0 r-m0N ON 001 In 1n y y W W•i.,' �+ co y%D O f-0%0 0%V'O a% O Ln 0 Ln 00 00 V' v N 0 Y1 un 01 In y V 1; .i O1 -ill O 1l1 Vl �D �D 04140 N000%rl MN%DNMrlr� r1.4 ODO ri.q N N O H U # wn.4 M.-4 .i Y1 r`O 1-V'Ln O N O to D%m Ln Ln o O •�V' v1 y v a W C4 y y w 14•4 MMMO NN I, O, m N N V•N M M I- r, E4 N M M M H EE U z O 00 a%co O N In O O 0 r, 0•-/ .i.i N N 0 O W N1D O 1D NOM 9Ll OO OO W OD U O 00 0r,0co%D0Ln OM ON t-l- ON D% a' b 00 a 014 r`V'.i ON 01a NM N N ON ON U .i -w N%n N 0%M O .i-w t:;1;1n 00 sMc 01 V N M N V' W1 y M In 1n Ln y z 0 H a A z u C'4 V w w pr o, zz° y zNF.pW ZA 'J0H4 awiy NrAl WH W U NW H W uu �11.1°-Iw o 0 to O(pay��Uo •'o xw H w zg((OL, w Z M H H W W H A P � I 1 w H O H3zN '�Hy a W z0UP4 HW O Uyy y a f3 µ a W A w w WW U W W W a W OG H H H sC A E4 4' y W'a W aappyy W p�yU' iC MQU HHU W y W sC Hy Hm �0 W1'l�y-yj1 �RC RCH�FC 2OWw z{'{Uk1.�a W a� (paW�,H WH W W 1{Nj IUn M IZ HQy ya3aH U uaHaMU Ol z•vw7ia H`�` W z a A CL W W zN NHN S E A W A W W H zC�z N z z c 0 G4W 7C7C7CSC 33300y� to A d EE"-- N U z O 000 O 0.0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W 0000 00000 0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 A h oo o o •0 0 • • 0 0 •0 0 . 0 m O" ;V' 01O4"0 ..NM4.-1N ; ;444M V I;,;. W nm o,Oo% O EH o N ".i.-4 .-4 14.4140yn r W mmmO1 m m 0 .i O WW '.p In 1n In 00 01 H \ rn w d w r p t n C. N M O t o O f u)t n 0)O t a Q O o�n O.'- l o O u3 M M W W tn9 u') OEMli p)t9 etO fM O ONNa 100 to u' Lr! p Z L� n a OOtn.r O to N to et gv)m SLn n O N N -T N N .�In to w'D m a w) .-� m w.r to BO O N C% of ce n n n u)tO Nt0 Ic M) O N MON MO t0 M to b t0 d m � -t r~co m— n .-t u7 1-Ln ti N O O M 1N u� C pC t0 t0 M n Oco d ti W OC Z J¢Q m O fD .••�M O O w O O to O to .�O o O O O O O O 6 6 N to O N a O O t�O N O O O O O S N Co O In O rr u) u) M M ut N Ott N t0 O 01 Ot O uJ N u)u) Ot u) u) M Zn t0 to N.-mm mto mm CO ON NN f'�.-+� r %r 2 f^7 C^�1 m 1^A M Mn N lo M m d • • d •-1 N M Q 4 p to o to N I�NQ."t n Ooi u) 2tpO)Ot O)OOOa M) m M .--� k 0=) u7 u1 cA ul o%Lo O cA O 10 u3 CO�co N cA O)to N A) fb co f d f C # O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cl O O O o o O O O O O O w 0 # p 99 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O d # W ]C W�4 # of Q \t^O # Co J \O Q U 2 r co O W z r O X to O ul n o v O Mtn u').-+..-4 t0 10 a c nO)�o n n N yY W Y Q O Ol u9 uJ I�mOM u).-t to 0100f�OD u)MO T �t O pp J t H co S l�N Ot of .-t V'NR O tO to;z o�N ato O �.-.vtn co villa too�cDmmc O O o O .�'. LL(y tocoMc r`toc c Q N u1c WtONti01.--� a o m O w r tY V) �r M N t.tD O co I M t0 a O M M ."t GO u)� —0 N O Q N n to uI u7 U G.LL 4 N N M co N uJ int0 (mN 1� r # r d f w 4 tip 00 O t000%o.-+O)O)coN Nc>c 1c 1�00 u3 co U J O O O N O O O)n m o w!u) O O O O O f D O O O cT M M N pQ N O co to co Ira% t0 u) u -'r .4" f uq O r O u b n M to t0 M of cA R fr f% an01 t0�N W I% Nn n n n Q V .--� N m M S Vf N N N Z NLn cc ZZ O O Z r tr-. n4 4d O Z W Z p W p U Z r 1 f W U-t to d NZO t W H fn to Z td-t H �Q w U YQ t �!W QQ N (J Q! # W # k d' ¢W Ztom-t f W NJ(, Z W QQF k "J(, Z W w p W rQ t N J 7 Qdd'' J J W r m V I X ZQ 0000 J W P-A N X�O O J /_- J J 3 W r Q Q Z U O W W r Z V 7 J Q Z U O W W ZZZ V I J Q U Q Q N rr tfwtoQ r QQ W to¢ r r H OC Z '0- W JOCZr Wr O §C W Jd'r W r O O O W H r W IIN��ryQd W.-+Z p LL r+ r VVcx V4)d W Z p LL.•+ r r r r H E W W t n o c L W Zp l-j O r�K Q Zp Z O O GGG O d' d J to O«<Y d U d U J N O d U fn U O 00 cljC. Y8 O Q p dclj p W S O Orp OOS OOOO S� n W O Nf070tOOO O S W N dr O u)t0 Q2 NM vul tC l� w3 CD O Q CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SALES TAX REVENUES six year comparison revised 1993-94 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $865.000 $802.387 $62.613 7.24% FI�CAI� .......................A �ISCAL<; FISC FISCAL;> FTSOAI. .. YE II : i'E R %Inc YEAR:.,:,:.. %Inc -EAR:.;; %Inc REAR'::: %Inc YEAR ; %Inc MONTH 881$9._.. . S'� (# ec 40191 (Dec) (Dec) 92l93 ec 93f94 ec October 2 ,,0 $"37M. 35.1% $44 fI 1.> 16 7% 13:1; 6 0% $ 0,956; 9.0% i.9,40$ 95.1% November 1$,4Z8 V. 59.3% 7,1.I7. 51 0% -24 8% 42,126 50.8% 5#7,623; 20.2% December 1�,$3l '11,05 18.1% 2$464; 35.2% .::::>: ° o 0 >.,:_.... 3, 73: 16 9/0 33,$5t> 1.7/0 7O,t5 107.3/0 January 2r,1S6 . .3............... 3` 28.8% 47,106 36.7% .,4#1 :I. ::: -151% {7713 69.2% I46,541 57.3% �::::;:.:. February 1 ,5 2 594 61.0% 22 48 : 42.1% > ,1 �i 78 4% 39,3SI -1.9% 57 839.; 47.0% March l4,'7�8 3065 107.5% 32;955 7 5% 37 4$8 13.8% 44,176 17.8% 59,37 34.4% April 4$,f�35 37OI: -23.5% 4I,445.; 11.4% 7,543: 38 8% &8 664: 19.3% $7,43$ 27.3% May 27,$2# 31 5t11.. 13.2% 36,6..27< 16 3% ..41.,OI3 12 0% 54,623; 33.2% 58,21 6.7% ,I June 24, $1; 37 447 55.7% 37,$94 1 2% 4 1#15:; 13 8% 52,027 20.7% 59,5..7.: 14.5% July 3$,t�3a 51;374 33.0% 47 017::` -8 5% 15 9.2% $0,567 NAST'56.9% 16.9% August 22 9 3I;969 40.8% 35,951: 12 5% 4&73I 35.5% 48,290 -0.9% S$9$4: 22.1% September , 4.2% 37�flp4i 13.9% 9 Li 15.5% ,39i. 27.3% _.. ..... ...... _ _ ......... TOTAL $31193.$396146' 27.1% $44$,14$ 13.1% $5Ifl 03: : 13.8% $ 3 ,738 24.8% $842,387 37.8% sl.srax9a.WK3 REPORT DATE 09/09/94 • First month of 1/2 cent additional sales tax. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SALES TAX REVENUES 1993-94 collected budget balance budget to date balance Percent S160 000 %135.502 S24-498 15,31% FISCAL YEAR MONTH 93/94 October $0 November 0 December 0 January 0 February 0 March 0 April 0 May 29,145 June 29,788 July 47,079 August 29,490 September 0 TOTAL $135,502 SLS[AX94.WK3 09/09/94 m V)mwMwC4a _uV eieieieieaeieieaEa�a�OMInc)NccCVWtoCl)0)VGoV) aeaea�ae_Nr_at aeae � C9MmWCDNm�{ffefNNYf�'•�r�rIOWWMYfWNmNettOMWamM IANr'(D�NrN 0 IOM C NMwMlwm 0—NON 17WWrvf-co0)OIOWat-C*4W— -WOMWow mroomwor m NN a M U ONOOWNrWOMNrOWMr-MIOr,IOI"faW. WrrIOV.1MIOrO WVVNOr it ON _N —If) —N— rVN 1�_ NVIO —V— 1 1 1 m 45 41 WWVWNNVo WW O. Cm rWVVrmWmIOWOr-OWWW(OIOaC10'Ifl-�rm1ONVWN�-OJr-rV r-rvWNmWr NW pI� Ea eVWaorNrIVIOWWVrV10WOVWM�'mWrNln000roromm m<riri�-�InO min >D �fWNrmr(Or�IO�MNNVNr'MW�NmW�m1OMW0{OOMVr —wVIONNww Inc.) a ^o►OVWMmWr^OmrWOVfOOMNVNWVMrrVNNmW1O�'- woven OMIOW NW ILL . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F- O�'^rmrWNVNO�-^IONWOVVor-wMw -NNrvofwOf-" 000l_wwNOW V� M wmWNVUIOVVWMVr—UI m—rm^Mmo .-owwwt-wmm r- IO —V ^ as NVIO W -N ^ VWIOWO OWNW MOW W—M VV M r N 0) NN N NI�:NN M M � HHHNHHNNHMNNNNNNMNNNNHNHNNNNHHNNNN M 4A4*4^VW Nf1►N N HH N r W^WOWVIOIOODIOYIWr-ovw OMrMWMWWVW�-WWrowwo OWWOMMW— WO L OWWt-vomw wwrw"f-omrVOMVIOwmwoVIOIONmr-w rOWrMWV— m� V men . . . . . . . W E+• �OO�NVNrttllOmWa00mmmltl101000WmMOMrrmaWM� owmo OVVr mN W >.a �VN10M1OVW --Mor"N" OM a0 VWrmrmr-maWOWN M— -IOrro—IO—NI OOMWlOWW N—rIOWIOVIO IOW L a0 VWWNVm(Or(OV��IOmrIDtOIOOVWMMNNIOMOOrWrrr Vo VMNWV M� m VI- WWOMW{ONVmW{OMW^m^VWrV�'Om(O r-wwWmM—Vr W^ IO W r' W WVW r—N N VNWMO WrNw VOW W—V r-w— V M N m ION M CO WM N N SOD ++ M M a m 1 m V►HMHMNHNHNNMNNNNNHNNMNNNNNNHNNNNHN M NNNHNMNN H NN H ++ L C ieaeaei:ieieieieieie�ieieieieieieie3eieieieieie 2=2e2esE2e2e?E2e2e ieie ie leis ie C a a _Mvm_mNrNmWr-owmwOIOIOO—NOO WWr-^OOD^IOIO 0— V men W O U O'�WWf000W�-IOOMOMrMWOMNNWWIO()WMONNtOMfOW V-0000w— rC) \ \\ \ . \ U N M�tOC.) NItIWVm�am�aM�r�mOW1O0�'NNIOM�NWtO VO»NO�� V7 .- ^NN�0"" N N M� N_VMMN ��W N1V Q 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 C la U O +• a. X ^ m 3 L F 3 a >.L IOa0r007007mr1OOVr V^W�-�rc91OO101O00WmrMIOMOu1 NIOOOWOMN WO � o. � am amNooMWWln--o�mmorV�—InvvWMomNIOIO--Wr—� —WooIOOWN Mo O w 0 >- r-VWVW� aDaDr�lO191O1Or07rNNIOMWW1000NN070WWMV NOONOIDM r-O m O U m IOMONIO�IOMNIOONVNIOWPNOMNWWV WIOWI'OWVVmr ION W CO- 0 W^L IO^M—IOOOr_wwv_O_Wrwr_wvNrV aW"WNVMNM WW w MIO W ++ L X MO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ V ^IO m a m a a— MIOVNVO^MIOIOVNWWr 007NVr-WOO N�-rlOmmM101D V ++ ++ H LL WOV W"N 10 VIOIOVO CI)WC14W OOr m^V VM ' N L //I ton. —N N mmNN V _O - 0 L Ul E M N - ^ 00 +0 O O lz 27 v U 1 C (Oj O MHNNHNMNNNNNNMMMHNNNHMMNHNMHNNNNHH N NNNNNMNN H HN M go M ++'O aovtOMtnIOOVNOraulmt0rl0NVmtON^NOIOMWIOmWOMm WOOOMO�-10 ^o m co rV��MMNO�� NMPNIOM071O�-IOrNrtOOWOIOraWVIOr VMOOWOow WO E l0 EL VI-)a001 r-vc.4 0M19W07MWatrlOafWMIOVOIONO�Om�r� r070000r1O MO L UI >.m rWNONWNV^IOaDIOL9NaMIONr-WOWaW IDMN^rmVNO ^^ N Mm V O aO. MO—OOWwOIO--VMwr-mN1OMm—r-wv MVWWVOVWW IOO m rN N C y aW mWPNWMmtO�-m�OMWO�OrWrN�Om NMr-IOWW^VW mr M r mO1 C.) VWO-- MONO VOW M -V CDC)— W V to Cm U mL ION M VWMN V _r M _ aM ~ M M UOt mX Cla NNNNNHNNM►HNNNNHNMNNHNHMNHHNMNNNNNN N MMNNNNHN N NH N yH cc ieieiei�ieie�aeie2eieie3eige3E2eieieieieieieieieieieieieieieie3eae ieieieieieieieie 2Eie N 040 OO00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00 men 1-4 000 00 0000000 00000000 000000000 00000 00000000 00 Le Liz IOOo000100moo0w000 Ommoommm 0000000010 00000000 MO my ma 30 N Om C130 aw m Uv 0a ^_ +00 0 +' 0^ m S ^E +' 0 O m >. C L^ w ++a m' 0+0 134 m Y a C3 Ym ++ >. O a >C` C sOC . 3^ Lw LLC Lm^^ "a fa IL04 0 +0 +, +. 0+. O Y 3 aYLV L m0 +-1)00»w+— C 06— 0OmtOCC0 ++CILOf>.mi--wa++3 >Er Ea Cla 0 3 C^++ ^ ^ 3 w 3 3 � mVOW WWtL 4.C7C7SS=YYJJ�ZddOOIONOLN3^333m UO LQmwma�UE+Jfm++0 O O m• OUNEW 0004-0m 0^iC O CLOL >.3V U V a—wj20-33m0L0 - YO ^ Aft+ CC C-U>CC3N� L 0 M Oa L^QCL7UO^OY-mti mm L Nw VWX '* I- ~ w • MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST 1994 TRAFFIC ON TRAFFIC 14W Non State City Parking Parking Law Ordinance Total 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 897 6 25 5 933 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 0 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 248 3 13 4 268 C. Cases Dismissed 158 0 7 0 165 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 0 0 0 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 121 0 0 0 121 B. After Deferred Adjudication 114 0 1 0 115 C. After Proof of Insurance 108 0 0 0 108 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 0 0 0 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 13 0 12 0 25 TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $30,226.84 STATE 18,465.00 TOTAL 48,691.84 MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT JULY/AUGUST 1994 COMPARISON low DULY [AUGUST 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 704 933 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 164 268 C. Cases Dismissed 83 165 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 3 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 90 121 B. After Deferred Adjudication 94 115 C. After Proof of Insurance 61 108 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 7 25 TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $14,977.75 $30,226.84 : STATE 9,795.00 18,465.00 TOTAL 24,772.75 48,691.84 • A 4J A A >. A 04 04 b rd to U 4..I r-I > W > >r >, t71 ri Id V r I a) a) S4 a) a) a) a) r td rd a) r I a) 4-J A S4 a) rI �4 (L) t4 a) 0 -r-I 3 x as •r-I a s4 A �4 �4 �4 P 4-) 44 a (dE p0 �400 s400 nip 4 9 O >4 0 3 M 044 3 04-4 J-) O 44 4-) rd a) U U '.�; r� U 44 a) >i 4a a) 4J 4� Q) a X Ua) W GQ a) a1 a) a (L) S4 0 r-A �4 :j I~ H 0 I~ r-i 0 3 I~ a < b 3 b a) a) -r-I a) r-1 O U (1) r-i 4-J a) r-I .0 O M �4rd � �4 4J 4-3A 5 a) 4J � E a) E a) �4 00 04 00 rn 4J 44 aA4 -rI aArn aArn ba � H -W � 4J0 m .ri Id >4 Oa (d b 0aI~ 0 04 0 I~ 0 r r� rl r I rl rl m 00 •,� >~ 0) U A ro a) Id 0 0 r-Ia) Id 4J a) Id 4J 3 M 5 -rl (d .H M -r-I 0 0 0 I~ > U 4J 4-) a) > u 4 > U 4-) 0 m 'b b �I to .s~ O a) A a) ,� a) r-I rd rl $I rn �4 0 s4 x a to rl • to b a 'd 'd ,A x • I OO 0 .N o � r4 � 41 S40 a) IA >4A > � r o �I o � oo s~ a o 0 r~ rlrl a) � 0 -ri0 0 � � Id0rI U 04 U H U 3 H a4 a Id H A J.J z U H A rn H A m A 3,3 t W W d,. o\o o\o oM oM o\o o\o o\° Q O O O O lf1 O o\o o\o o\o oM O Q ..` r-I co r-I -44 0) CD O O O 0) Z �* W � U `w 4-, W N a C/) Q QU CO .. 2 Z CL o CA ` a �4 rn rn a 0) to �'•*. U a) a � � a) � � � to a) N H 4-) r I a) 0\ Cla Qa r-I S4 4J A 0 FIX h O w h h h h U i O U) U) -W O rrhh r� C O 0 0 V a 0 a. 0 � 0 4J 5 a ro a) rn t4 U to t(d s4 t4 ri (dr W co t3) U) �4 y r4 a) N W H A 0 U 4J 4J td rd �4 m Id tl; }-I P fn td s~ s~ >~ S 4 O > a W H U O H rd S4 w >+ w (1) 4J w aoi �4ate) o u0i ) ai J-) 4-1 U 0 4-J >, a) (1) r-I rl H 114 r I (1) O O to U a) a rd r-I U 04 �J �4 U rl r-I S 4 I~ 0 0 a� 0 m r 0 U U A a w 3 u r>+ P4 c1) w w W o H ri N M Cl r I r .................. 1-i rd to >4 CA �4 a M ' ri • U rl O r I a) coO G rl Ul (d Ol a) rl rl •r1 cd �4 r l r-i �( � rn 4J of r� A rl 'd (� U U r I Ul (d p t o 'd r I :J 0 rl" r I N O f r" r-I 014 `d U co O W 0 I~ rl (d r-I .4 rl r� cd U U s~ 4 �4 O rl ri s~ 1-) dJ r (d LS R� ?+ 'b rl rl a) r r I s" 01 Ul 4J G 4-4 Ul 0 O r. ¢(44 m O m rl rl (d E� 44 04 -14 a) rtt J-) "A (tf A L�l w 'b }-I 41 4 S 4 U � 4-) 11 (d rn U 4-) O 0 r-I O •r I •rl 'TS CA Ul bl O Ul J) N tT CA CA 1) O r 1 G r-I (13 I a) �4 (tj Pa Ul -rl Ul A �c O O a) -rl (1 rl a 0 a) U O b 0 Ul rc$ r. >-'. W 1 I Sa CA U r', (d I O J) 0 rl (�" U rl rl tT) a) s~ O Ul 0 �4 rl b }-I 0 S I •rl -rl (1) O (I U 0 U) O �4 O rl O 11 fd rl (d () 0 �4 r-I 4-) -r-I O (L) 44 a) 4-) 0 rl O O (d O 0 S4 A -I U 4-)3 M 0 4a w a r P w>> w Ov 0\0 0\0 OM 0\0 f}ccll o� c� u� c� oM oM eM i Ln ul Ln co 0 ul 0 0 o Ln 0 Q [- N N Ol Ol ri ri ('7 [- 00 Z �t W r-I V W W U) N � ri Ul CC Q V Q •rl a) .J 44 PQ m N C H Ln Ol 0) 0) U Q N h z h U U (d rC o r1 E \ \ \ o o h \ \ \ \ \ (") (Y) 0) al Ol a) � U U U U U U a) (d (d O O O O O O �] C!) �] ►� >1 a) �4 r (d CA (d 4--) a) b rl W (n •A U G4 O U (d -rl ul Ea E PL rl H 44 a) t7) �4 �4 44 �l Vi CA P4 (d rd 0 a'i � O O O O U) (d O H J-) �) W od r= S4 3 U >~ W (d O H �-I 3 O a 4-) a) A S I U cd a b U 04 a a) U a) W O O cd U 44 a) V z I~ z -rl p O r-I �4 w U Aa1 ° S4 a�i a) U a) a � a) to Q >~ a) -r-I 4-) a) r-I 04 a) a) 0 4-) 0 0 a) rd r-I U 4-1 4.) r� a) >1 > a) a) r t 4-) -H H to A A a) 0 �4 (d P4 O �4 Ul r-I CA CA �4 0 C? $4 H U (d a a O 4-) r-I a) S4 a •1 U1 a) -rl N r I �4 4-) U) ar l 4 N o p, co a) 5 5 (d (d cd w G O a) Ln a) O a) r-I 0 S4 W x (24 w H U W x W U C4U HJ-) N M d• Ln l0 r 00 Ol O ri N M r-I H r-I N N N N W.. Q4»: H Q � Q< Z w Uwe � U N QUQ � J m .. 2 Z C Z Q C11� 0) U O H v or a o �� cVry w y o W W �4 N s4 p IM rX4 a a Ln l0 [� 00 O r I C0 C N M d* l!1 lD [� l O rl N (") N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M d� d� d� d� d� d� SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT August, 1994 POLICE SERVICES Citations Issued 933 Residential Burglaries 2 Arrests 38 Business Burglaries 2 Traffic Accidents 22 Vehicle Burglaries 0 Alarm Calls 159 Assaults 5 Animal Calls 59 New CID cases assigned 32 Thefts Under $750 12 CID Investigations Cleared 48 Thefts $750 and up 4 Active CID Investigations 30 FIRE SERVICES Residential Fires 2 Ambulance Calls: Commercial Fires 0 Vehicle Accidents 9 Other Building Fires 0 Non-accident EMS 22 Vehicle Fires 0 Total Patients Transported 17 Grass Fires 5 Grass/Weed Complaints 12 Fire Alarms - False 13 Burn Permits Issued 2 Fuel Spills/Leak 7 Pre-fire Inspections 19 Other Haz-Mat Calls 0 Building Plans Reviewed 28 Bomb Threats 1 Other Fire Calls,'* •42 SUPPORT SERVICES Total Police Service Calls 1763 Total Training Hours : Total Fire Service Calls 65 Police 160 Crime Prevention Surveys 8 Fire 44 Total DARE Classes Taught 0 Communications 72 Warrants Received 25 Volunteers 0 `fir, Warrants Cleared 13 Total Personnel Trained 28 Total Warrant Collections $2 , 736 . 50 9-1-1 Hang-up Investigations 10 *CID numbers for Det . Sessions only. Det . Ward' s numbers were not available . 14-1 E+ w W : l V QI: o\o o\o o\o o\o o\o o\o O o\o O O O O W, O O Ln O O O O HH. H di d4 d4 d' M I:zr d' co Ea .W 0 0 0aN d' Cl pi Id O OD w to d' \ co r- r- m CJ E O O o o 0) 0 O O O d• dI d' I-zv M M M d• d' d' Ol Ol O\ m O\ al al al Ol O\ al W t al O H r-I ri w O to H r-I O M O O O N m N O O N , 07: H to N N r-I I` to -q4 N 0o I;v _ .Xxl: O CD O O H O O O O O O C) E A: rts LLI d� d• d• M m d4 34 d' a) M d+ d'v d' 4J a\ al y al al Ol a\ 4-3 a\ EQ a\ al OlM a\ OD o rl t- rn o O W a) W O tD OD 3 rn H O O Q ► .. H " O I O ,-I N 'b H Cq H x O H riu O E ri ro H -r1 r-I O C` r I l0 a OD d' ri Coo M CL O p V O vQ O ri O O 17 O H O O .T. Cu O U) ►�r W H r a) qc:r M M M M b d+ M M M M dv A C9 ri to Ln I` I` L` r- d' U) N r-I t- w to N O r-I O O O H a\ H O O H ri O v a W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a p1 g N al ri N N N co m H N O OO ri ON J F4 ri O CD r♦ ri H O Ol O O ri O ri O m n- sG O U -A H U J 1 H H 4-1 a ro 4-) N U a O r r a w o •� Q Ul :a Ul N H d� � S�-I � � � � •� U] J ro 1.1 J-) a) ri 1:4 Q I~ Q: 1 1 U S4 a) p Ill a) td E E r-I '� }-I E E a) — a) a) -H (� 44 C4 a) 0J a) a) s~ a r-I � �M a a y r O 4-) �0 > P � O a) O :j 0 1:4 � H a Id O O O a v a) a) �4 04 � m 0 a r I �4s � s4 b a) U U a M a 0) 4-) r-I U H a a a �I s~ y E a) r. H a) O r-A r-I H U H S 4 a) as a A 4 H H $ pq 04 Q, a cd p r-I C: O r-I �I �4 �4 a) �4 E O (d -r1 S4 O �4 �4 U) V r-I a) a) (L) 4-) (1) .S i 4 rl H A 4J a) a) () a) O E 4-) •r1 4-) M .0 >4 U (d E t~ 4 a 4-) 4-) N a) �4 ER (d 4 co —4 � rd a) - i O Id (d m �4 �4 :J �J 3 $ 3 �40 cd U U) 1-) (d CA U) CO CO 0 U) U py: O ri N M d' U) ri N M Lfl l0 OO al H H ri r-I H r♦ ................... 4 p w' 94: H. w.a v a►; o\0 (� o W Q o Ln W CJ ri O E+ t rn rn rn rn Ln Ln U) O:a A ri ri ,-l0 0 ri (n rrn Lf) rn rn oll W 4. Ln F� N No N r d' O O rz A (d u u W G�: T S-) "W dM d+ lw ro ro Ol 1J ON Ol Olj Ol H N 4J Lo w LOO r i U U o pq o 0 0. o \ \ \ \ '" '^ Ol a rn b rl Ol � rn� o Fo O O Ow O w o w o N Q ' � b L�4 dw H O\ Ol Ol Olj m Ol t: ri ri ri ri. S"i O O y lD Ln w , O O O Oc U O O ri U) u u rd aG O ri I 'b 54 Ul U) w G4 �4 r i t-) r1 rn U a) E ,R O Q) U E O 4-3 4J xi J-.) r14 w F4 �4 -rl (d m >+ 4J -- a J b �4J rO 4 O -r1 L •r, cn r. ca r. -r-) �4 0 �4 w 3 H: JJ - 4 aJ 4J -r-I a) p, M. X 44 11 w u 4J ri E -: H_ w W -.--I ri •rl r-I -.-I (d a) O O vs ri UU) r�-1 ' ri a r-+ 'J �di 44 ' [l1: r-A ?1 (d ?4 x ?4 >. w (d U) �4 CO 4J �4 U) 1-) }4 U ri 'b 01 r-I 4J 4J CO (1) rt U x q •r i u r♦ r-I cn r I D m (15 d4 cd (d •ri (d cd (d a) O O a 3 �l CO E U1 3 3 3 aJ Q -r-I a ri x OD Ol O ri N H ri r-1 ri ri N N N k a A 3 �w O Oo G+ O Q O V1 $ S O O� Q CDa l- O O v1 O, O, O g F a o a� v�� a � � O� v� x 0 W � •y U: .............. .............. .............. a c a a o a s o+ a Q% a o� rn a c a a a v eo v M N N C CD O v1 �O C M ~ N q 11 M a0 3 'O VS � a d;: a '� aci q n a cc x Ci; o aci W x b Q A }r 3 Q.. b a f��1 V01 M en fV � �i1 0 O '~a' O b O 00 V cq W) v O� 00 en M0 N in h N W)i 00 Neq n U — W �. Z ♦ y C, 2 c 2co °> o U ,..� � m w co m �. ca •� °° � � � oa WZ n aci m An U A p�p V 5 > > C aci c c [ c C c a o m c U ua Z � � Q a s > d �' O w a v d W y ° I C 0) 0 ll 3 c u u a en y x C C C z N Q y d O P, �O! (O �O v 9 as 0 0 =' q° o > a a o e E 9 8 Fi A City of Southlake,Texas M E M O R A N D U M September 12 , 1994 TO: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Brad Payton, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Monthly Report for Street Department August, 1994. ---------------------------------------------------------- Description July Auq 1 . Tons of asphalt used a. Hot Mix Asphalt 12 77 C. Cold Mix Asphalt 750 300 d. Base Material 400 300 2 . Lane Miles of Road Repaired 100 100 3 . Number of Street Signs Repaired or Replaced (all types) 63 48 4 . Feet of Ditch Line Cleaned and shaped 500 1500 5 . Number of Vehicles Repaired 2 1 a. Dump truck repair transmission and replace clutch 6 . Row mowed in miles of streets 92 92 BP/cbk UTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH August, 1994 July Aug GALLONS PUMPED FROM WELLS 0 0 PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 107 ,498,000 134,566,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 107,498,000 134,566,000 WATER METERS SET 45 63 NEW WATER TAPS MADE 4 5 VALVES REPAIRED 13 3 VALVES TESTED 31 36 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 3 1 FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED 1 5 FIRE HYDRANTS FLUSHED 23 28 DEAD END WATER MAINS FLUSHED 7 1 WATER MAINS REPAIRED 1 0 WATER METERS AND SERVICE LINE REPAIRED 6 8 LOCKED METER FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENT -0- 9 PULLED METERS 1 0 METERS REPLACED 3 0 MISCELANEOUS WORK ORDERS 214 267 SEWER LIFT STATIONS CHECKED (4 L.S. ) 80 92 REQUIRED MONTHLY SEWAGE TESTS 10 8 SEWER PLANT MAINTENANCE (BANK & DOVE) 40 46 SEWER MANHOLES INSPECTED 1 4 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 0 0 Put the new high pressue plan and the Florence overhead storage tank into service on August 30, 1994 WATER SUPERINTENDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ce y t. =1 U 17 a ►• 4, cc 7 pq y 79 .. _ cOi p g a C a � y 'CC y o o a; a >b J-5 y 90 � � � y � y ap �y to O W R 'O N q U O U N O', •b o3 w m oq O a pCi> o D •�y p QQ q 'ti b �' ao w Q pGi .b > �4E) a: w a3 w p y V a U °; ca O ce d: :: N C a. eq °' °�' .a aqi •o '� a ,� .o01 "WWfx w p O o U OO�. .9 a . L .�. o � caao a ao o • —aa• ,. w a o p M o 5 oo s CS. cdw a 3 0 'O p ra �o a' 0o q .. a .. o �a o0 oo U • a :: e0 a v a+ VJ N O q y_ 8 O V • O wl•� N c0 4. U vy� ►-d N N U � . M N b M•� .•1 q b .y Vim. �� y N U • y I • 7 q nz W .q .q q o o Q o U `� U a.'g 9 a 0 ca U 05 Q a. .., a. >;: U a .. I-� w q . w U a <` Y?> .W W Z .::; O 8o eo so go Gd tn h �: N O O V-1 a H da w <> M Watn WW 0; a°o 'd N o0 00 o :::;i ::. . a 0 a o : oho a� .: o � rn a A+ d a O a; o :: A : �arA ca aqi ° 00 00 ; A a x 1 w : 3 ba U ; a (/J p ..'....O N cn ba O y b a N C. Cd o0 a a a, w O Ar.. .: N M N o o 0 C� CL ,, to's O y cti Oa tU" 00� a a jj y a s 5 'o b � w° r. o a� . o o x a 4o c� o o N bo �, En O �' 'b r7 p O O Q�i 'b CL cd q 'p 04 oA p �. y .� a ►r0- y N R y 4) b y co p w • V o--I cdtlo vim, 3 0o a o 3 a� w �; n 'b O w w C °L3. y U O w OU O .�L o ,. �. O t. � 3 � �.� asp aQ �, � � ',> o � � � �a N w ......: a cis o ;.. W, A A FW-+ W W o 0 0 bs a ON : q r o0 0 oo aai en EF o a .a ° d oo d o 00 o co A" U cd � a A o w �. c W D Y A w ., >• ta0 y w cd y 'O a w cnba `d a rn x o O 1. - ` o U; 0 oba ON F; Q v, x a; U i N C7 CVILJ �J v3 ... ........ ................ y O N V1 O U 0 N 404 w w O `.3 U O y -� A +' TJ 04 3 A U A o M O N q .� Y Q > ; � � � � 1r rA y O � T, > � 3 y a y A y a ° o �a ACl V .... N hp :... O O ONO '::a::: V) O .. cn pNt O cn ...: t . w U U Va Q o V w 0 w a 5 la. a E ,mac o a. aa '� oaa > bo93 � U •.. M b O U b O O Ir✓ � Q � AGiaU 3Ua c"'iQaiU '° QogU �Qai _ .. N ^" � o 3 a �w obb atz 41 10 _CIS a.� w `v co 16. Q, ,� oo•� ' q o w, y0 U C v N .a co ID,cis CIS co CIS ' .cis 4) Od cis cn Ei to, U O q Ir q t0 ° �e O n. o 3 °? >:..:... fi. F ; Fw•• . c . ....G3.. C?; >:: woo > > 00 ao o G Eei o Z A F z H ��,, a o 0 o Q Q W d 0 Q .. Q � E '.� W � w wa JD Cd co ram.. p ed yy q � ed o y q N y y �77 y U A Oo "� Q w >O U im >cis ° E C7 Ci. W C7 (Cd (V cl; cf -i Cy .� CV Cal qf1 ►' y 1. w Q . xi .� ,F o a 3 a h 4r F+ ° cis a '$ o o. Or- ............... > oo a a o 7 W N o 3 0 .. oo :> 0 3 a, �a �a .y .� y A. N .0 C a ° S. °a q �a ° DO a �f :> N on > eo y o cc N a .o toS� x a H O>OF .090 c0U N ca c a Z f� !� U . 0 o 0 0 ... *..' <>C3 .. [> to Logo 04 ob b 0 0 <' 04 t ' Q y z U U a Cd O a ae 7 O U N N h .--� N N (� City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER c, 5—� 7- September 15, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Revised Developer Agreement for White Chapel Place Addition This revised Developer Agreement for White Chapel Place Addition includes the installation of a sanitary sewer system in lieu of individual lot septic disposal system. With the cooperation of the developer and for the mutual benefit to residents of the neighborhood and the development's future residents, the developer will install a sanitary sewer to an existing sewer located approximately 500 feet west of White Chapel Place Addition. The developer has obtained easements from the property owners for the off-site sewer main. The revision in the Developer Agreement includes: • Sect. II, ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The standard agreement for on-site sanitary sewer. • Sect. IV, OFF-SITE SANITARY SEWER: The standard agreement for off-site sewer with the addition of the Council agreeing to credit up to $4,000 in Inspection and Administrative Processing Fees as the City's share of the off-site sewer main. Please place this revised Developer Agreement on the September 20th council agenda. (311- BW/sm wpfiles\memos\whrchp.rev ,f s WHITE CHAPEL PLACE ADDITION DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of the White Chapel Place Addition, to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 6 lots contained within the White Chapel Place Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release 10% of the lots after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied, and street signs (temporary or permanent) with street names are in place. The remaining building permits shall be released as soon as the streets are complete. The Developer recognizes that Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure within the Addition has been accepted by the City, and this will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed so that final acceptance can be obtained. C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the �"A-a r 1 Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or `'"' responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. G. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all -2- S�-J facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; C. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and C. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. I. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. -3- S�' T J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with current ordinance and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, approved by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation cost of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final -4- .r - acceptance of the Addition; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of- way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation incompliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer -5- ��to agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. F. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets,and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: -6- 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City „MW in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer's Agreement executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co-insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for -7- any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151,309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in -8- �� 9 the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. Developer agrees to install sewer facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat. Sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance 493 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, `%W and engineering. ... :.:::..::..:.:..:.:..:..:.:..:.:..;:.::..;:.::..;:.::..::..:..:..:..:.::..:::.::..;:.::.::..: x:.:..:.:.............:.:...........::> .:.:u ef: ...:s.:....:.:.::.:.:.::.:.:.:.:x..z.c..............:..:...:..:................:..:.:...:..:.......:..:..:..:..:..:..:.....:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.s:.:.t ..... n ...........:..:.r.:..:.a.:....fi...�.l.:..:.: .:......:.:.:.:.:.:.. ::;:;;::: ................. .:: :.... : ......................... :............. ..... . .: ::::::::::::::: ......... :: :..:: ;.. M. ..................................................... .................................................... ..................................................... .............%..................................... B. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: The Developer understands that the Drainage Ordinance, Section 6.06-13, requires that each development contribute on a pro-rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development. This development is within the basin served by the box culvert in East Continental. The Developer agrees to pay their share of the culvert expense prior to the beginning of construction. C. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees to pay park fees in conformance with Ordinance No. 483 (Subdivision Ord.), Article VII, Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements. The Addition consists of 5 lots for a total required park fee of $2,500. D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree preservation Ordinance 585. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: ' Title: Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: c:1 wpfilesldevagreel while.cpl -10 �i9// REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. -11- City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM low September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance 623 - FY1994-95 Tax Rate The FY1994-95 budget proposes a tax rate decrease of$.006 from $.455 to $.449 per $100 of valuation. Ordinance 623 establishes the $.449 rate with the allocation of $.27285 for maintenance and operations and $.17615 for debt service for the tax year 1994. Taxes are billed October 1, are due December 31, and become delinquent after January 31, 1995. Delinquent tax incurs a penalty of 6% for the first month plus 1% for each additional month up to a maximum of 12%. Interest accrues at a rate of 1% per month on delinquent taxes. The ordinance also provides a 15% penalty for taxes not paid by July 1, 1995. Tarrant County serves as the City's tax collector. At the September 6 Council meeting, the Council approved the ordinance with a 5-1 vote. Please r place Ordinance 623 on the Council agenda September 20 for approval. LAH 71,N ORDINANCE NO. 623 41W AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FIXING AND LEVYING MUNICIPAL AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1994 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1995, AND FOR EACH YEAR THEREAFTER UNTIL OTHERWISE PROVIDED, AT THE RATE OF $0 .449 PER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100 . 00) ASSESSED VALUE ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AS OF JANUARY 1, 1994, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT EXPENSES AND TO PROVIDE AN INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON ALL OUTSTANDING DEBTS OF THE CITY; DIRECTING THE ASSESSMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR DUE AND DELINQUENT DATES TOGETHER WITH PENALTIES AND INTEREST THEREON; PROVIDING FOR PLACE OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE TAX ROLLS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City") hereby finds that the tax for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending September 30, 1995, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City and the general improvements of the City and its property must be levied to provide the revenue requirements of the budget for the ensuing year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved, by a separate ordinance adopted on the 20th day of September, 1994 , the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending September 30, 1995; and WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements concerning the levying and assessing of ad valorem taxes have been complied with. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS : Section 1 . That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2 . That there is hereby levied and ordered to be assessed and collected for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending September 30, 1995, and for each fiscal year thereafter until it be otherwise provided by and ordained on all taxable property, real, personal and mixed, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas, and not exempt from taxation by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, an ad valorem tax ra%e of $0 .449 for the general operations 714-oZ of the City on each One Hundred Dollars ($100 . 00) assessed value of aw taxable property, and shall be apportioned and distributed as follows : a. For the purpose of defraying the current expenses of the municipal government of the City, a tax of $0 . 27285 on each One Hundred Dollars ($100 . 00) assessed value of all taxable property. b. For the purpose of creating a sinking fund to pay the interest and principal on all outstanding debt of the City, not otherwise provided for, a tax of $0 . 17615 on each one Hundred Dollars ($100 . 00) assessed value of all taxable property, within the City which shall be applied to the payment of such interest and maturities of all outstanding debt. Section 3 . That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on December 31, 1994, and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 1994 . There shall be no discount for payment of taxes prior to said January 31, 1995 . A delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by State law Section 33 . 01 of the Property Tax Code, to-wit : a penalty of six percent (616) of the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is delinquent plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid prior to July 1st of the year in which it becomes delinquent . Provided, however, a tax delinquent by July 1st incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax without regard to the number of months the tax has been delinquent . A delinquent tax shall also accrue interest at a rate of one percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain delinquent on July 1, 1995, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of taxes, penalty and interest due; such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to contract with the City' s attorney pursuant to Section 6 . 30 of the Property Tax Code. Section 4 . Taxes are payable at the office of Tarrant County Tax Collector. The City shall have available all rights and remedies provided by law for the enforcement of the collection of taxes levied under this ordinance. Section 5 . That the tax rolls, as presented to the City Council, together with any supplement thereto, be, and the same are hereby approved. Section 6 . That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby expressly repealed and rescinded to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict . Section 7 . If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto Page 2 7.4-3 Ordinance No. 623 b:0RD-623.TAX/0RDE.RRS/kb any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect aw the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect . Section 8 . That the necessity of fixing and levying municipal ad valorem taxes of the City for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas, requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1994. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: �W Sandra LeGrand City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1994 . Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective : Page 3 Ordinance No. 623 b:ORD-623.TAX/ORD&RES/kb City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance 624-FY1994-95 Budget During the budget work sessions with Council on August 17 and 18, the City Council reviewed the City Manager's proposed FY1994-95 Budget. There are two components to the Budget, the Operating Budget and the Capital Projects Budget. In past years, the Council has adopted an Operating Budget. Adjustments to the proposed General Fund budget include an additional allocation to GRACE in the City Secretary/Mayor/Council Division, adding $2,500 for a total of $7,500. A reduction in the travel and tuition line items within the Division offset the addition. A major program discussed with the Council is the Neighborhood Sewer program. The proposed budget included $750,000 as a capital outlay line item in the Utility Fund's Sewer Division to initiate this program. At the work sessions, the Council directed Staff to explore an expanded t multiple year approach, prioritizing neighborhoods based on needs. Public Works Director Bob Whitehead developed a three year$4,370,500 proposal, with five neighborhoods listed in the first year at an estimated cost of$1,158,000. The Capital Projects Fund Summary proposes that $1.3 million certificates of obligation be sold to fund the first year of the assessment program. The All Funds Summary retains the $750,000 as a transfer from the Utility Fund to the Waterworks Improvement Fund. These funds can be used for other water and wastewater projects not eligible for funding through impact fees. At the August 16 Council meeting the Corridor Study contract was amended and increased by $15,000. These funds were not reflected in the FY1994-95 budget within Community Development. It is proposed that the funding included within Community Development for the Trails System Master Plan ($20,000) be instead allocated for this Corridor Study contract. The Trails System Master Plan is proposed to be funded through the Park Dedication Fee Fund. Operating udget The All Funds Summary reflects revenues of$14,485,420. Total Expenditures are proposed at $14,477,603. This is an increase of$271,310 over the budget presented at the work sessions. This increase is comprised of the $20,000 added to expenditures in the Park Dedication Fee Fund for the Trails System Master Plan. The balance of$251,310 is the operating transfer from the SPDC Operating Fund to the SPDC Debt Service Fund. This amount had been included in the SPDC Operating Fund summary, but was not reflected in the All Funds Summary. 7G' Curtis E. Hawk FY1994-95 Budget September 16, 1994 Page 2 Capital Projects Budget This budget is a compilation of projects funded through bond sales, impact fees, the 1/2 cent sales tax, perimeter road fees, operating fund transfers and other sources. It lists all major capital improvement projects by fund, grouped according to improvement type. There are water and wastewater projects, streets/drainage and parks projects. The budget proposes $8,343,689 in revenues and other sources of funds. Total Expenditures proposed are $11,629,951. An Infrastructure Reserve Fund is established through the transfer of $820,026 from the General Fund operating budget for street and drainage improvements. The Capital Projects budget also includes the Assessment Program. At the Council meeting September 6, the Council approved 6-0 the FY1994-95 budget and amended FY1993-94 budget on first reading of Ordinance 624. The September 20 meeting will be the final reading and public hearing on the budget. LAH t ORDINANCE NO. 624 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94; APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1994, AND TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 1995, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 1993-94 budget and submitted same to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Southlake, Texds (hereinafter referred to as the "City") has caused to be filed with the City Secretary a budget to cover all proposed expenditures of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending September 30, 1995, (hereinafter referred to as the "Budget")'; and WHEREAS, the Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes, shows as definitely as possible each of the various projects for which appropriations are set up in the Budget, and the estimated amount of money carried in the Budget for each of such projects; and WHEREAS, the Budget has been filed with the City Secretary for at least thirty (30) days and available for inspection by any taxpayer; and WHEREAS, public notice of public hearings on the proposed annual budget, stating the dates, times, places and subject matter of said public hearings, was given as required by the Charter of the City of Southlake and the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, such public hearings were held on September 6, 1994 and September 20, 1994, prior approval of such dates being hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Council, and all those wishing to speak on the Budget were heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the Budget and listened to the comments of the taxpayers at the public hearings held therefor and has determined that the Budget attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS : Section 1 . That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. 7C-.3 4 ` Section 2 . That the revised figures, prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 1993-94 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3 . That the Budget attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 1994, and ending September 30, 1995; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget. Section 4 . That the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy of the approved Budget, along with this ordinance, with the City Secretary and in the office of the County Clerks of Denton and Tarrant County, Texas, as required by State law. Section 5 . That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Section 6 . If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect . Section 7 . That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next f iscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1994. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Page 2 Ordinance No. 624 /`ye D:GRU-634.HGT/ORD j 6RHH/kb PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this day of 1994. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective : Page 3 Ordinance No. 624 b:ORD-624.RGT/ORD4RRS/kb e—� CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PROPOSED BUDGET 1994-95 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY Special Revenue General Debt Service Utility Parks/ Fund Fund Fund Recreation SPDC Total Projected Revenues-FY94-95 $6,868,850 $1,652,510 $4,963,600 $107,650 $892,810 $14,485,420 Less: Projected Expenditures $6,831,198 $1,594.508 $5,417,247 $83,350 $551,300 $14,477,603 Total-Expenditures-FY94-95 $6,831,198 $1,594,508 $5,417,247 $83,350 $551,300 $14,477,603 C.O. Proceeds(net) 414,180 0 0 0 0 414,180 Transfer to Infrastructure (820,026) 0 0 0 0 (820,026) Net Revenues (5368.1941 f3453.6471 A24,30 $341,510 (� Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital9/30/94 $1,543,972 $241.029 $1.827,722 $59,653 $409,163 $4,081,539 , Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital9/30195 $1,175,778 $299,031 $1,374,075 $83,953 $750,673 $3.683,510 1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 $Increase/ 1992-93 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) %Increase/ ExMditures Actual Buda Budoet Budget Adopted -Decrease General Fund Personnel $2,503,204 $3,170,715 $3,165,055 $4,111,936 $941,221 29.7% Operations 1,446,772 1,513,643 1.605,017 2,063,354 549,711 36.3% Capital Outlay 503,797 1,178,409 1,238,808 655,908 (522,501) -44.3% Total Expenditures $4,453,773 $5,862,767 $6,008,880 $6.831,198 $968,431 16.5% Debt Service Fund Debt Service $654.983 $1,063,382 $1,241,920 $1.342,923 $279,541 26.3% Debt Service-TRA bonds 231,861 246,448 246,448 251,585 5.137 2.1% Total Expenditures $886,844 $1.309,830 $1,488,368 $1,594,508 $284,678 21.7% Utility Fund Personnel $357,771 $394,653 $440,232 $451,405 $56,752 14.4% Operations 2,060,136 2,350,494 2,689,214 3.067,858 717,364 30.5% Capital Outlay 153,437 280,400 342,400 519,375 238,975 85.2% Debt Service 79,719 81,895 81,895 78,525 (3,370) -4.1% Operating Transfer/Other 291,367 294,613 294,613 1,300,084 1,005,471 341.3% Total Expenses $2,942,430 $3,402,055 $3,848,354 $5,417.247 $2,015,192 59.2% Special Revenue-Parks/Recreation Operations $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 100.0% Capital Outlay 15,996 520,867 665,310 63.350 45( 7.517) -87.8% Total Expenditures $15,996 $520,867 $665,310 $83,350 ($437,517) -84.0% SPDC Personnel $0 $0 $8,252 $47,680 $47.680 100.0% Operations 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Debt Service 0 0 0 252,310 252,310 100.0% Operating Transfer 0 0 0 251,310 251,310 100.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $8,252 $551,300 $551.300 100.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,299,043 $11,095,519 $12,019,164 $14,477,603 $3.382.084 30.5% PROPOSED BUDGET 1994-95 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY 1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1992-93 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease FUND ActualBudget Bud-get ud t Adopted Adopted General Fund Personnel 2,503,204 3,157,944 3,165,055 4,111,936 953,992 30.2% Operations 1,446,772 1,526,414 1,605,017 2,063,354 536,940 35.2% Capital Outlay 503,797 1,178,409 1,238,808 655,908 (522,501 -44.3% Total 4,453,773 5,862,767 6,008,880 6,831,198 968,431 16.5% Debt Service Fund Debt Service 654,983 1,063,382 1,241,920 1,342,923 279,541 26.3% Debt Service-TRA bonds 231,861 246,448 246.448 251,585 5-137 2.1% Total 886,844 1,309,830 1,488,368 1,594,508 284,678 21.7% Utility Fund Personnel 357,771 394,653 440,232 451,405 56,752 14.4% Operations 2,060,136 2,350,494 2.689,214 3,067,858 717,364 30.5% Capital Outlay 153,437 280,400 342,400 519,375 238,975 85.2% Debt Service 79,719 81,895 81,895 78,525 (3,370 -4.1% Other(Capital) 24,072 25,000 25,000 0 (25,000 -100.0% Operating Transfer 267,295 9 6 3 269,613 1,300,084 1,030,471 38 Total 2,942,430 3,402,055 3,848,354 5,417,247 2,015,192 59.2% Special Revenue- Parks/Recreation Fund Operations 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 0.0% Capital Outlay 15,996 520,867 665,310 63,350 45( 7,517 -87.8% Total 15,996 520.867 665,310 83,350 (437,517 -84.0% SPDC Fund Personnel 0 0 8,252 47,680 47,680 100.0% Operations 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Debt Service 0 0 0 252,310 252,310 100.0% Operating Transfer 0 0 0 251,310 251,310 100.0% Total 0 0 8,252 551,300 551,300 100.0% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 8,299,043 11,095,519 12,019,164 14,477,603 3,382,084 30.5% EXPENDITURE CATEGORY Personnel 2,860,975 3,552,597 3,613,539 4,611,021 1.058.424 29.8% Operations 3,506,908 3,876,908 4,294,231 5,151,212 1,274,304 32.9% Capital Outlay 697,302 2,004.676 2,271,518 1,238,633 (766,043 -38.2% Debt Service 966,563 1,391,725 1,570,263 1,925,343 533.618 38.3% Operating Transfer 267,295 269,613 269,613 1,551,394 1,281,781 475.4% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 8,299.043 11,095,519 12,019,164 14,477,603 3,382,084 30.5% 7(f-7 i PROPOSED BUDGET 1994-95 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1992-93 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual BudgetBudget ud Adopted Adopted City Secretary/Mayor/Council Personnel 58,728 114,582 100.600 69,150 (45.432 -39.7% Operations 74,591 79,709 100,365 115,060 35,351 44.4% Capital Outlay 9.707 6.588 18,035 10.388 3,800 57.7% Total 143,026 200,879 219,000 194,598 (6,281 -3.1% City Manager's Office Personnel 124,702 151.393 160,570 261,522 110,129 72.7% Operations 23,416 23,950 30,110 43,106 19,156 80.0% Capital Outlay 2,955 2.735 2.345 0,90E 7.170 262.2% Total 152,073 178.078 193,025 314,533 136,455 76.6% Economic Development Personnel 0 0 0 57,626 57,626 100.0% Operations 0 0 0 59,619 59,619 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 Q Q Q 100.0% Total 0 0 0 117,245 117,245 100.0% Support Services Personnel 17,056 24,935 24,240 24,755 (180 -0.7% Operations 476,792 502,174 535,140 576,955 74,781 14.9% Capital Outlay 8.796 75,000 75,000 41.075 (33,925 -45.2% Total 502,644 602,109 634,380 642,785 40,676 6.8% Finance Personnel 114,537 170,909 169,710 178,135 7,226 4.2% Operations 73,393 84,979 79,085 87,505 2,526 3.0% Capital Outlay 17,914 0,950 7.295 0 (5,950 -100.0% Total 205,844 261,838 256,090 265,640 3,802 1.5% Municipal Court Personnel 87,024 93,925 94,145 115,865 21,940 23.4% Operations 57,252 74,680 72,840 86,225 11,545 15.5% Capital Outlay 510 0 198 1900 1.900 -100.0% Total 144,786 168,605 167,183 203,990 35,385 21.0% Fire Services Personnel 463,846 547,667 550,667 594,373 46,706 8.5% Operations 78,646 74,277 74,277 78,565 4,288 5.8% Capital Outlay 24.340 98,200 98.200 111,725 13,525 13.8% Total 566,832 720,144 723,144 784,663 64,519 9.0% Police Services Personnel 708.566 830,604 833,604 994,903 164,299 19.8% Operations 98,389 114,385 115,585 132,767 18,382 16.1% Capital Outlay 88.388 79,800 79.800 121,400 41,600 52.1% Total 895,343 1.024,789 1,028,989 1,249,070 224,281 21.9% ��8 PROPOSED BUGET 1994-95 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1992-93 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget BuduetBudget Adopted Adopted Public Safety Support Personnel 290,062 347,995 347,995 557,360 209,365 60.2% Operations 50,088 67,415 68,215 78,040 10,625 15.8% Capital Outlay 17.118 24.000 24,000 54,680 30,680 127.8% Total 357,268 439,410 440,210 690,080 250,670 57.0% Building Inspection Personnel 130,367 202,531 197,006 263,313 60,782 30.0% Operations 10,719 21,600 21,300 88,442 66,842 309.5% Capital Outlay 12.919 34.361 41.185 23.400 (10,961 -31.9% , Total 154,005 258.492 259,491 375,155 116,663 45.1% Streets/Drainage Personnel 259,939 341,421 339,421 446,022 104,601 30.6% Operations 326,611 308,920 301,580 323,350 14,430 4.7% Capital Outlay 270,944 766,745 800,300 227,700 (539,045 -70.3% Total 857,494 1,417,086 1,441.301 997,072 (420,014 -29.6% Parks and Recreation Personnel 44,148 64,902 72,660 120,705 55,803 86.0% Operations 56,374 73,350 87,662 127,560 54,210 73.9% Capital Outlay 37.702 58.055 66.200 15.895 (42,160 -72.6% Total 138,224 196,307 226,522 264,160 67,853 34.6% Public Works Administration Personnel 54,246 99,170 99,170 190,845 91,675 92.4% Operations 45,449 13,460 16,663 150,550 137,090 1018.5% Capital Outlay 2.369 8.775 10.400 19,100 10.325 117.7% Total 102,064 121,405 126,233 360,495 239,090 196.9% Community Development Personnel 149,983 167,910 175,267 237,362 69,452 41.4% Operations 75,052 87,515 102,195 115,610 28,095 32.1% Capital Outlay 9.135 18,200 15,850 18.740 540 3.0% Total 234,170 273,625 293,312 371,712 98,087 35.8% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 4,453,773 5,862,767 6,008,880 6,831,198 968,431 16.5% DEBT SERVICE FUND Debt Service 654,983 1,063,382 1,241,920 1,342,923 279,541 26.3% Debt Service-TRA bonds 231,861 246,448 246,448 251,585 5.137 2.1% Total 886,844 1,309,830 1,488,368 1,594,508 284,678 21.7% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 886,844 1,309,830 1,488,368 1,594,508 284,678 21.7% PROPOSED BUDGET 1994-95 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY > EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1992-93 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease UTILITY FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted Water Utilities Personnel 313.621 345,901 386,321 347,018 1,117 0.3% Operations 1.426.108 1,237,568 1,763,204 1,966.148 728,580 58.9% Capital Outlay 139,983 266,900 328,900 434,875 167,975 62.9% Total 1,879,712 1,850,369 2,478,425 2,748,041 897,672 48.5% Wastewater Utilities Personnel 44,150 48,752 53,911 104,387 55,635 114.1% Operations 370,978 824,926 621,510 712,910 (112,016 -13.6% Capital Outlay 13.454 13,500 13.500 84.500 71,000 525.9% , Total 428,582 . 887,178 688.921 901,797 14,619 1.6% Sanitation Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations 263,050 288,000 304,500 388,800 100,800 35.0% Capital Outlay Q 0 Q Q Q 0.0% Total 263,050 288,000 304,500 388,800 100,800 35.0% Non-Departmentalized Other 24,072 25,000 25,000 0 (25,000 -100.0% Debt Service 79,719 81,895 81,895 78,525 (3,370 -4.1% Operating Transfer 267,295 269,613 269,613 1,300,084 1,030,471 382.2% iIiiw Total 371,086 376,508 376,508 1,378,609 1,002,101 266.2% TOTAL UTILITY FUND 2,942.430 3,402,055 3,848,354 5,417,247 2,015,192 59.2% SPECIAL REVENUE- PARKS/RECREATION FUND Operations 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 100.0% Capital Outlay 15,996 520,867 665,310 63.350 (457,517 -87.8% Total 15,996 520,867 665,310 83,350 (437,517 -84.0% SPDC FUND Personnel 0 0 8,252 47,680 47,680 100.0% Operations&Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Debt Service 0 0 0 252,310 252,310 100.0% Operating Transfer 0 0 0 251,310 251,310 100.0% Total 0 0 8,252 551,300 551,300 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 8,299,043 11,095,519 12,019,164 14,477,603 3,382,084 30.5% 7e�� (Irr ALL FUNDS SUMMARY REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 $.455/$100 1994-95 Adopted 4s5) 100 1993-sa 1ss3 94 ;i 448ri00 $Increase/ 1994-95 ............................ _, ..............:.... ................ . ..................... _ _. 1992-93 1993-94 934; :? $Increase/ %Increase! 1994�35c :` (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget (Decrease)(Decrease) -Decrease poppetf:€:<;: Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $2.961,048 $3,285,361 '< ; 5&{It ($29,198) -0.9% <;';<$;;784 #8Q $499,619 15.2% Sales Tax 636,737 701,500 X;; ''> '': 323,500 46.1% _; ;1;8 9 Q(I 1.148.000 163.6% .. Franchise Fees 305,909 336,40096*15 61,725 18.3% ;.;;?fQ 81,640 24.3°,G Fines 182,271 231,440 ;.. 2t400 960 0.4% 242+fQ0 10,960 4.7% Charges for Services 59,087 57,250 _.''':'':z 6,295 11.0% 80,#i0 22,750 39.7% .. Permits/Fees 1,398.832 1,138,000 �,717tY2t1. 579,020 50.9% 2,041:350 903,350 79.4% Miscellaneous 121,435 35,440 ;82x775 57.335 161.8% _;,.5,1,35(1 57,910 163.4% Transfer-Interfund 267,295 421,613 :;»> 16;6i 155,000 36.8% J1?6,#5�7; 494,53� 117.3°,6 Water Sales-residential 2,294,377 2,018,500 7Q , G 681,500 338% � 7 rQQi: 951,500 47.1°,6 ............................ Water Sales-commercial 438,097 418,000 92,000 22.0% 6i2,Q00. 194,000 46.4% ..:...: ...... Wastewater Sales 237,213 270,454 ::;:: € ,i1SXl 89,546 331% !t3Z1 161.546 59.7% 296 252 320 000 <>? <>335 E10f3' 15 000 4.7% >><><i 4327'1XX 112 000 35.0% Sanitation Sales , Other Utility Charges 297,390 197,078 ........ 3 i7;a0Q, 140,422 71.3% 33.. 193,922 98.4% Interest Income 101,779 86,000 2 7,5 101,700 118.3% 2 2 `tt? 1�50 158.i�% .. . Total Revenues $9.617 722 $9,517 036 :t1a_79184k: $2,274,805 23.9% S14 495 420; $4 968 384 52,2% EXPENDITURES .:;. City Secretary $143,026 $2W,879 _..... 19,4(x1 $18,121 9.0% $194,598 ($6,281 -3.1°,6 City Manager 152,073 178,078 f93,025 14,947 8 4°,6 91433 136,455 76.6°,6 Economic Development 0 0 E# 0 0.0°,6 1#7, 4a 117,245 100.0°� Support Services 502,644 602.109 �: 32,271 5AX �`: 40.676 6,81(e General Gov Total $797,743 $981,066 $65.$39 fij% S}269;161< $288,095 29.4% .............. Finance 205,844 261,838 256i>9(S (5,748 -2.2% 265640 3,802 1.5% Municipal Court 144,786 168 605 -0.8% 2�.$`30 35,385 21.0% Finance Total $350,630 $430,443 �d23, 73`: ,.Z'7o $ .]$Z 31°b Fire 566,832 720,144 123,144 3,000 0.4% 784;663 64,519 9.0°� Police 895,343 1,024,789 1028989 4,200 0.4% 124SU70 224,281 21.9°� Public Safety Support 357,268 439,410 44.21Q $44 690�580: 254.674 57.0% Public Safety Total $1,819 443 $2,184 343 2A92.343 $8,000 4,41a $2 723 813 $539,470 24.7% Building Inspections 154,005 2W,492 259491 999 0.4% 375,155 116,663 45.1% Streets/Drainage 857,494 1,417,086 .1,441,301:. 24,215 1.7% 997,072 (420,014 -29.6% Parks and Recreation 154,220 717,174 90008d 182,910 25.5% 395190 (321.984) -44.9% Public Works Admin 102,064 121,405 "126,233:; 4,828 4.0% 36f1,495 239,090 196.9% Water 1,879,712 1,8W.369 2;478,425` 628,056 33.9% 2,748,{14T 897,672 48.5% Wastewater 428,582 W7,178 688,921< (198,25 -22.3% 901,797 14,619 1.6% Sanitation 263,050 288,000 16,500 52% 388,M: 100,800 35.0% Public Works Total $3,839 127 $5,539,704 Q,6, $659 251 11.9% $6,166,550 $626,846 11.3% Community Dev.Total $234,170 $273,625 Sz93.312 $19,687 7.21n $,371112 $98 087 35.8% Transfer4nteffund 267,295 269.613 2fi9,613< 0 0.0% 1,551,394 1,281,781 475.4% Other 24,072 25,000 25;000; 0 0.0% 0 (25,000) -100.0% Debt Service 966,563 1,391,725 1,57,0263'' 178,538 12.8% 1925,343; 533,618 38.3% Total Expenditures $8.299.043 $11.09$,519 472:619.i64 $923,645 Q 31,: $14,477.603' 3,382 084 34.E Net Revenues $1,318,679 $1,351,160 $7:81T Proceeds from C.O.Sale $0 $1,040,000 $1,293742 $253,742 $414,180' ($625,820 C.O.Payment $0 ($155,000) ($155,000) $0 ':$0: $155,000 Transfer to Infrastructure $Q Net Revenues $1.318 679 $91 L419 ,$1 604.902 $295.454 Beginning Fund Balance $1,956.492 $3,170,120 $3,170,120. $4,081,539 Reserved Fund Balance ($105,051) $0 $0 $0 Ending Fund Balance $3.170 120 S2.476.637 $4&a 539 L1681= CONSOLIDATED GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 $.455/3100 5J$1Qp 1993-94 : : 9 -s5 .:.... 94 . . $Increase/ 1993�4 $Increase 1994-95Ado Adopted 1992-93 1993-94 ± [ (Decrease) %Increase/ � :{* $ > Decrease %Increase/ (Decrease) REVENUES Actual .:::..: ...--- Budget ReitS Adopted -Decrease f`p:.5 Adopted -Decrease Ad valorem Taxes $2,981.048 $3,285,361 : ' �32 A ($29,198 -0.9% :<: ..................... 4 QQ $499,619 15.2% Sales Tax 636.737 701,500 $fi5AD0 163,500 23.3% ' 531,500 75.8°� Franchise Fees 305,909 336,400 >;< 1� 61,725 18.3% `:`` $ t0 81,640 24.3% Fines 182,271 231,440 >> <> lOf# 960 0.4% >><»»>242 dt30 0 ° . ,�.;:.;:.;:.; 1 ,960 4.7,6 Charges for Services 59,087 57,250 6,295 11.0% ` `` ` ``` 8t1{1t3Lt 22,750 39.7% Permits/Fees 1,251,288 1,088,000 ; 474,020 43.6% <'..... i41�'iS� 853,350 78.4% Miscellaneous 44,847 84 17 940 <><':»><' 18 235 101.6% >> > >d` :.< 1.ri' 23,810 132.7% ............................ ............................ ................... ............................ ........................... .......................... Transfer-Interfund 267,295 421,613 << .`:SF S�3 155,000 36.8% >'''> 84F1 243,227 57.7% Interest Income 66,234 >:' >:<»»»> 51 500 85.8°.G » `» 55,000 91.7% �. ................. Total Revenues $5,794,716 $6,199,504 7 iO4 S14I $902,037 14.6% ;C8 52 jW.4. $2,321,856 37.5% EXPENDITURES City Se cretary $143 026 $200 879 '. '': ': 19{SOi) $18 121 9.0% >-'< ? 194 598 281 -3.1% Manager 152,073 178,078 > >> >€'33'Q25 14 947 8.4°� » » 3f <533 136,455 76.6% Y 9 _...... ......:: Economic Development 0 0 3; 0 0.0°,6 J1 ? 117,245 100.0% ............. ........-_............... Support Services 542.Sx44 602,109 32.2Z1 5.4°.6 40.67s ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ General Gov Total $T97,T43 $981.066 $66,339 6.7% ; $288,095 29.4% ........................- .......................... ...................... ........................ .................. .......................... Finance 205,844 261,838 < <; 25 (5,748 -2.2% <<»> <265fiQ 3,802 1.5% Municipal Court786 168.605 -0 8°'f' .... . 35.385 21.0% Finance Total $350,630 $430.443 2 -1.7% >< ss Q £39,187 MY, .................... ............................ _......._................ .......................... _......................... _.............. ......................... ................. Fire 566,832 720,144 72J1 3,000 0.4°,68#fi63 64,519 9.0% .. Police 895,343 1,024,78989 4,200 0.4°,61245t10 224,281 21.9% ..... Public Safety Support 357,268 439.410 250,670 57.0°,G Public Safety Total $1,819 443 $2 184,343 l2,3?t3: $8 000 0.0i 11 :... $539,470 24.7% Building Inspections 154,005 258,492 259.481 999 0 4% 375155 116,663 45.1% Streets/Drainage 857,494 1,417,086 1;441 01> 24,215 17% 997,Q72 (420,014) -29.6% Parks and Recreation 138,224 196,307 22652? 30,215 15 4% 26416Q 67,853 34.6% Public Works Admin 102,064 121,405 4 828 : .....360 495 239,090 196.9% Public Works Total $1,261 787 $1,993,290 32a53 547 $60,257 3.0% S1v$96882 $3 592 9.2Ya Community Dev.Total $234,170 $273,625 5293312: $19,687 7 2°k :.:i;'...3S r7 2 598,087 35.8% .............__.. ........... .._.......... Debt Service G.O.Bonds 886,844 1.309,830 , $ 178,538 13.6°.6 $ 284,678 21.7% Total Expenditures $5,340,617 $7,172,597 ST49#k,248; $324.651 45% $8r42,�,71 1,253,109 17.5% Net Revenues $454,099 $577,386 $1,068,747 Proceeds from C.O.Sale $0 $720,000 720,827 $827 $41411W ($305,820 C.o.Payment $0 ($155,000), ($155,000) $0 $0 $155,000 Transfer to Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 ($820,02 ($820,026 Net Revenues $454.099170.120: $578,213 $97,901 Beginning Fund Balance $1,265,833 $1,614,881 $1 6,4,881' $1,785,001 Reserve Fund Balance ($105,051) $0 $0. $Q' Ending Fund Balance ,$1614,881 $1 206 788 $1 785�001 $1 47d 809: GENERAL FUND REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 $.455/$100 1993-94 1994-95 Adopted $455/5100 $Increase/ 1993-94 4491$>00 $Increase/ 1994-95 1992-93 1993-94 99.93 94 ': (Decrease) %Increase/ 1954 95 (Decrease) %Increase/ RE-VENUES Actual Budget ReY►..sed...: Adopted -Decrease ] � $ Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $2,144,651 $2,204,198 2l75QtX ($29,198 -1.3°,6 >: ;>;saySQ $121,752 5.5°,6 Sales Tax 636,737 701,500 >; ;;; ;j65 163 500 23.3% <`. 1, 33,{J(3Q 531,500 75.8% Franchise Fees 305,909 336,400 398,.1 61.725 18 3°.6 418 t 0 81,640 24.3°,6 Fines 182,271 231,440 ._.....:'.:��32 40f} 960 0.4% :..... 242.,M 10,960 4.7% Charges for Services 59,087 57,250 63,S4. 6,295 11.0°,6 : :a30; qQ 22,750 39.7% Permits/Fees 1,251,288 1,088.000 474,020 0.6°,G ,:: :.:,1:,941:350 853,350 78.4°.6 Miscellaneous 44,847 17,940 36175 18,235 101 6% 4..1.TarO 23,810 132.7% Transfer-Utility Fund 159,446 159,446 159.44f 0 0 0°�6 .:;:._ :49660; 336,914 211.3% Interest Income 54.194 505444 ;;.....X_:; -1.. 40.000 80.9�e :; :;: ::::: 40,000 80.0% Total Revenues $4,838,430 $4,846,174 rSaR17E $735,537 15.2% Y6868385�3 $2,022,676 41.7X FYPFNf11771RFC 143 026 City %s> Se cretary $200,879521�(�Ot3. $18,121 9.0% :;::: 59 ($6,261) -3.1% City Manager 152,073 178,078 €; '-';A9 t125 14947 8.4°,6 3f4' ° _........:..,538; 136,455 76.6.E Economic Development 0 0 t 0 0 0°,6 2d5 117,245 100.0% _..............:..... ..: Support Services 502,644 602,109 32,271 . ......."2185 40.676 General Gov Total S797,743 $981,066 565.339 6.7°k , ,Z6 a61 $288,095 29.4% S1 fl4B 405 Finance 205,844 261,83856090 ..<.......r_::.:.. (5,748 -2.2% 3,802 1.5% Municipal Court 144,786 168,605 1 -0.8% 35,385 21.0% Finance Total $350 630 $430 443 3.273 -1.7% $39,187 2X Fire 566,832 720,1," 723144 3,000 0.4°6 784;663 64,519 9.0°,6 Police 895,343 1,024,789 X 1,028,989;' 4.200 0.4°.6 1 249 U70 224,281 21.9°�6 Public Safety Support 357,268 439,410 .210 Q 250,670 57.0% Public Safety Total $1,819,443 $2,184,343 S2192 343> $8.000 8 t3 $539,470 24.7% Building Inspections 154,005 2W,492 250,401 999 0.4% 375 i55 116.663 45.1% Streets/Drainage 857,494 1.417,086 1 441,301 24,215 1.7% 997 Q7Z (420,014) -29.6% Parks and Recreation 138,224 196,307 226,522 30.215 15.4% 264160 67,853 34.6% Public Works Admin 102,064 121,405 126,233 4.828 4.0°/6 360�495 239,090 196.9% Public Works Total $1,251,787 $1,993 290 $2953.51417 $60,257 3.0% $1 996 882 $3,592 0.20A Community Dev.Total $234,170 $273.625 S 93.312: $19,687 7.2% 3371,71 $98,087 35.8% Total Expenditures $4,453,773 $5,862,767 $6008,880 $146,113 2.5% $618311198 $968,431 16.5% Net Revenues $384,657 $589,424 $37152 $1,054,245 Proceeds from C.O.Sale $0 $720,000 $720,827:- $827 $414 180- ($305,820 c.o.Payment $0 ($155,000) ($155,000) $0 $0 $155,000 Transfer to Infrastructure $Q $Q ,$Q Net Revenues $384,657 S138.658 $590 251 $83,399 Beginning Fund Balance $1,125,708 $1,405,314 $1,405,314 r, $1,543972 Reserved Fund Balance ($105,051) $0 $0 $0 Ending Fund Balance $1,405,314 $953,721 $1 543 972' $1.175 7781 Fund balance percentage-GY 31.55% 16.27% -.25,69% 17.210A:'. DEBT SERVICE FUND REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 a4 100 1993-94 1994-95 55/S Adopted 4551 10 $Increase, 1993-94 �td91` .. 3 Increase/ 1994-95 1992-93 1993-94 ?I:9994' (Decrease) %IncxeaseJ9¢ (Decrease) %Increase/ ...........:......... :........... ........... REVENUES Actual B Adopted -Decrease P)rQ:.. ::: Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $836,397 $1.081,163 ; € ; *tb $O 0.0% :':. 1................... [a9 (I $377,867 35.0% Interest Income 12,040 10,000 ': > > >'. # 11,500 115.0% ; 15.000 150.0% Transfer In Operating 107,849 26216Z ``< S Z 155,000 <>€ ' 119 -35.7% ................. Total Revenues $956,286 $1,353,330 <'. *51883t1f $166,500 12.3X EF652�i[rt€ $299,180 22.1% ............... ............................ .................... ............................ ............... ............................ ............................ ............................ ....................... ............................ .............. ............................ ............................ ............................ .............. ........... ............. ............................ EXPENDITURES <>PrinciaaI sz4o,000 S3ao,000 4X0O S13o,000 38.2% ..!l $360,000 105.9%SiC G3 . ............................ .... ...................... ............................ ..... ............t....... ............................ .......................... Interest 413,292 721,882zs€ 7ta ;9Q 48,038 6.7% t?4> 9Z (80,959 -11.2% 0 Admin.Expenses 1,691 1 500 500 33.3% <>'< > »::;:::>::>:z 500 0.0� ............... ............................ ................. ............................ Debt Service-TRA bonds 231,861 246,441� ; > 2W. Q 0.0% <«»> 2 1 513Z 2.1X .................. ........................... ............................ ........................... Total Expenditures $886,844 $1,309,830 9 88; 68 $178,538 13.6% [59? SOt $284,678 21.7% ...................... ................... ................. ............ .................. ............................ ............................ ........................... ............... Net Revenues $69.442 $43„50 ; 2: 114,502 Beginning Fund Balance $140,125 $209,567 t:ndkq Fund Balance S209,567 S253.067 7e.�f UTILITY FUND REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumalli.wk1 1993 94 1994-95 Adopted $Increase/ 1993-94 $Increase/ 1994-95 1992-93 1993-94 993 4< (Decrease) %Increase/ (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget ]ZeY Adopted -Decrease ?!rOpOS Adopted -Decrease Miscellaneous $75.380 $17,500 f ; (1 $39,100 223.4% ; 151'Sf1G $34100 194 ° .9.E Interest Income 30,118 24,000 41.000 170.8% »:' ;:;::;« o 3.5."bod 51,000 212.5,E Water Sales-midential 2,294,377 2,018.500 ' > ` ":'::.::` 681 500, Op 33.8% ` 2 97t){743Q 951.500 47.1% Water Saks -comrt!ercial 438,097 418,000 >z?3a'. 92,000 22.0°.E 62, t10. 194,000 46.4% Sewer Sales 237,213 270.454 >'>> >':: ;: 89 546 33.1% o + !32g0. 161,546 59.7.G Sanitation Sales 296,252 320,000 15 000 ° o ::::•.:::.,.:,. 4.7,E 112,000 35.0,E Other utility charges 297,390 197,078 ?? >> 140,422 71.3% > <> °391,i1� 193.922 9$.46r. Total Revenues $3,668,827 $3,265,532 >;;: 34 'fQQ $1.098,568 33.6% 34;9C i pp' $1,698,068 52.0% EXPENSES Omer 72 24 0 . $25 .cxxir: $o 0.0% $25 000 -10o.o°,E Debt Service-Revenue Bonds 79,719 81,895 $ $Q 0 0.0°,6 > »<>> Water 1,879,712 1,850,369 ; 2'g7#;'125 628056 ° '>`' o 33.9.E :>; > 2:7fl4 897,672 48.5,E Sewer 428.582 887,178 -22.3%8813 t> (198,25T 9E31.,797, 14,619 1.6% Sanitation 263,050 288000 >;;>'>` 4' ` 16 e o.50a 500 5 7,E 388 80[l. 100.800 35.0,E Opaating Transfer Out 267 295 2�,� .... � °6 Total Expenses $2,942,430 $3,402,055 ° 2,015 19 �� $446,299 131� 3�}�� $2,015,192 59.2/0 Net Reven ues S726.397 : > ,Q 3317,124 Beginning fund balance $585,579 $1,311,9761 31 t,$7&: $1 627 722 Ending fund balance $1 311 976 $1.175 453 $1 132r:722 $1 3Td 075 7,f 3 I SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Parks/Recreation REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 1993-9a 1 994- ed I Copt se/$Increase/ 1993-94 $increase/ ,ssa-s5 992 93 1993 94 . 4< �> (Decrease) %Increase/ ><;'(�� :>; ; ?�$� (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES ::..,.....:.....,,:.;;:.: ,.. .:: Actual Budget Adopted -Decrease Adopted -Decrease Permits/Fees $147,544 $50,000 :j25a 04 $105,000 210.0% 1I1Q 10 $50,000 100.0°,6 Miscellaneous 1.208 Interest ;�427 4 700 235.00/a <> >>?` Zi'a�`� : .z.G�Q 252.5% Total Revenues $154,179 $52,000 '#` :z': 1: 7 $109 700 211.0% • $50,000 96. �62 EXPENDITURES Profe ssional I Services $O o 'z �. $O 0 0.6 32ArR�. $20,000 100.0,6 Parks and Recreation 0 4,000 ..........:1 ,•#8G 138,486 3462.2% 18,000 450.0°,6 Park Improvements 15,996 49,157 0 0.0°,6 ° .... (7,807. -15. .69 Land 4 467,710 Total Expenditures $15 996 $520 867 G65,3.1 $144,443 27.7% 8 ; (5437,517 -84.0% Net e R venues $ 1 138 8 , 3 ($4688 ($34,743 $493,167 Proceeds tram C.O.Sale $0 $320,000 $320 00i3: �$E1. Beginning Fund Balance $105,080 $FM,20 $56$ tr`i: M Ending Fund Balance 63 SPDC - OPERATING FUND Parks/Recreation REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 1993 94 1994-95 .. Adopted S Increase/ 1993-94 $Increase/ 1994-95 1992-93 1993-94 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1994-$ :.. (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget Adopted -Decrease .,.Propose!`': Adopted -Decrease Sales Tax $O $0 $.#ti *000tt: $160,000 100.0% S6i6, Q` $616,500 100.0%Interest II !Z €€€€f€r '><:>:>: 1�4 100.0% :: 1?; 12.;i44 100.0% Total Revenues $0 $0 ><>>? ! i `: < $161600 100.0% 5 29 G': $616,500 100.0% EXPENDITURES Personnel $0 $0 :::: ': $8 26Z $8,252 100.0% S47,fif10. $47,680 100.0% Operations 0 0 ^:i `.........t1 0 100 0% D 0 100.0% Capital 4 4 Q 100.0% � Q 100.0% Total Expenditures $O $O ; ' ......... :` $8,252 100 0% _ 447 $47,680 100.0% Net Revenues $0 $0 $153,248 1513.1 2Q. $581,320 .: r Transfer to Debt Servke 0 0 ;:......_,Q. 251 31 U,; Proceeds from C.O.Sale 0 0 D; �. Beginning Fund Balance $0 $O 5153,Z : ... .. . .: Ending Fund Balance ,11Q 7e-/� SPDC - DEBT SERVICE FUND Parks/Recreation REVISED 1993-94 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 95sumal6.wk4 1993 94 1994_95 Adopted $Increase! 1993-94 $Increase/ 1994-95 1992-93 1993-94gg4 (Decrease) %Increase/ <;; 1:9;495 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual-- Budget Adopted -Decrease F'rSEKI: : Adopted -Decrease Operating Transfer In $0 $0 ;;; Sf) $0 0.0% 5351> tl 251 310 100.0%$ Interest Income Q Q ><:>:::<::>" 3.444 100.0% «> > 12-500 100.0% Total Revenues $0 $0 S3,OOtl $3,000 100.0% $263,810 100.0% EXPENDITURES Principal 0 o SD $0 100.0� $50,000 100.0� Interest 0 0 0 100.0% .,:,:.;:.;,.;;ap1:$k7 201,31d 100.0% Admin.Expenses100.0% 4 Total Expenditures 0 $ $O 100.0X >< ; 2Z..T.EA $252,310 100.0X Net e R venues 0 S $ .. .7.7D : $3,000 31150D $11,500 Proceeds from bond sale $0 $0 4254 16-.: Transfer from SPDC Operating $0 $U Beginning Fund Balance $0 $Q Ending Fund Balance $Q $Q CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 1 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget ALL FUNDS Actual 7/331/94 Estimated Propgsed Revenues/Other Sources Interest Income 121,287 204,668 243,906 361,250 Bond Proceeds 2,800,000 5,623,457 5,623,457 5,300,000 Transfer in-Other Funds 0 0 0 1,570,026 Fees 587,977 758,591 922,591 1,041,000 Assessment Income 11,228 5,922 6,098 1,060 Developer Participation 250,175 79,825 79,825 0 Carroll ISD Participation 0 0 0 30,000 City of Keller Participation 0 12.049 12,049 40.353 Total Revenues/Other Sources 3,770,667 6,684,512 6,887,926 8,343,689 Expenditures Water/Sewer Projects 1993 Water Bond Projects($1.3 million) 241,698 984,262 1,082,508 142,456 Water Impact Fee Fund 17,835 152,000 232,000 321,975 Sewer Impact Fee Fund 177,134 293,951 355,396 1,307,500 Waterworks Improvements Fund 0 0 0 993,740 1995 Water Bond Projects ($2.5 million) 0 0 0 596,000 Sewer Assessment Fund 0 0 0 1,300,000 Subtotal-Water/Sewer Projects 436,667 1,430,213 1,669,904 4,661,671 Streets/Drainage Projects 1993 Street Bond Projects ($1.5 million) 308,614 261,942 279,596 1,023,791 1994 Street Bond Projects($3 million) 0 74,134 80,000 2,468,000 Perimeter Road Fee Fund 0 0 33,000 0 Infrastructure Reserve Fund 0 0 0 840,526 Subtotal-Streets/Drainage Projects 308,614 336,076 392,596 4,332,317 Parks Projects SPDC Revenue Bond Projects 0 253,651 936,651 2,635,963 Total Expenditures 2$1 940 .9 11.629.951 Net Revenues 3,025,386 4,664,572 3,888,775 (3,286,262) Beginning Fund Balance 724,772 3,750,158 3,750,158 7,638,933 Ending Fund Balance 3.750.158 8,414,730 7,638,933 7e-/9 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 2 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 757-$1.3 MILLION FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget 1993 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,300,000 0 0 0 Interest earnings 39,699 24,561 24,561 5,000 Developer Participation (Oakwood Estates) 35,000 10,000 10,000 0 Keller Participation-Beach Str 0 12,049 12,049 40.353 Total Revenue/Sources of Funds 1,374,699 46,610 46,610 45,353 Expenditures Engineering contract 75,151 46,588 60,000 0 Water line-FM1709 west(Bal. of contract) 6,291 0 0 0 Water line-N.White Chapel (Oakwood) 160,256 0 0 0 Pearson Lane Pumps 0 19,274 19,274 0 12"High-Pressure 0 423,793 470,881 0 8" Peytonville (Cont-FM1709)12"Cont./TWKi 0 243,753 271,171 0 Shady Lane water line improvements 0 0 0 142,456 Beach Street PumpstUpgrade-Keller pump station 0 250,854 261,182 0 Total Expenditures 241,698 984,262 1,082,508 142,456 4Iii„r Net Revenues 1,133,001 (937,652) (1,035,898) (97,103) Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,133,001 1,133,001 97,103 Ending Fund Balance 1,133,001 195"349 97.103 0 ��-moo CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 3 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 751 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget WATER IMPACT FEES Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Impact fee receipts 243,000 271,900 331,900 390,000 CISD participation-Shady Oaks 12"water line 0 0 0 30,000 Interest Earnings 12.362 16,163 20,163 35,000 Total Revenues 255,362 288,063 352,063 455,000 Expenditures Impact fee update 17,835 0 0 0 Construction-Kimball water line 0 0 70,000 72,570 Engineering-Kimball water line 0 0 10,000 4,650 Shady Oaks 12"waterline (CISD) 0 0 0 130,000 Transfer to Debt Service-$1.3M C.O. 0 152,000 152,000 114,755 Total Expenditures 17,835 152,000 232,000 321,975 Net Revenues 237,527 136,063 120,063 133,025 Beginning Fund Balance 230,247 467,774 467,774 587,837 Ending Fund Balance 467.774 603.837 587.837 720.862 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 1 4 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 752 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget SEWER IMPACT FEES Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Impact fee receipts 315,112 436,678 516,678 575,000 Interest Earnings 17,362 23,468 29,468 37,500 Developer contributions 215,175 69,825 69,825 0 Total Revenues 547,649 529,971 615,971 612,500 Expenditures S-2 Sewer line easements 18,950 0 0 0 Engineering- S-2 Sewer line(BearCr/1709) 15,220 5,246 6,500 0 Construction-S-2 Sewer line (BearCr/1709) 142,964 249,137 303,896 0 Engineering- S2A Sewer line (1709/Flor.) 0 0 0 50,000 Construction -S2A Sewer line (1709/Flor.) 0 0 0 404,500 Engineering- N-5 Sewer line 0 0 0 39,350 Construction- N-5 Sewer line 0 0 0 310,650 Construction - N-4 Sewer line 0 0 0 500,000 Engineering-N-4 Sewer line 0 39,568 45,000 3,000 Total Expenditures 177,134 293,951 355,396 1,307,500 Net Revenues 370,515 236,020 260.575 (695,000) Beginning Fund Balance 250,122 620,637 620,637 881,212 Ending Fund Balance 20.637 856.657 88 M2 18 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 5 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 750 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS FUND Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues: Transfer in from Utility Fund 0 0 0 750,000 Interest Income 4.964 7.359 8.059 35,000 Total Revenues 4,964 7,359 8,959 785,000 Expenditures: Marshall Creek Sewer Line participation 0 0 0 243,740 Water/Sewer system improvements 0 0 0 670,000 Land-elevated water storage site 0 0 0 80,000 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 993,740 Net Revenues 4,964 7,359 8,959 (208,740) Beginning Fund Balance 224,617 229,581 229,581 238,540 Ending Fund Balance 229,581 235—M 238. 45 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET s FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget 1995 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual 3 /94 Estimated Proposed Revenues/Other Sources Bond Proceeds(4/95) 0 0 0 2,500,000 Interest Income 0 0 0 47.000 Total Revenues/Other Sources 0 0 0 2,547,000 Expenditures Engineering 0 0 0 196,000 Ground Storage Tank-5 million gallons 0 0 0 400,000 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 596,000 Net Revenues/Other Sources 0 0 0 1,951,000 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 Ending Fund Balance Q 0 g 1.951.000 7e;� CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 7 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 755 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget SEWER ASSESSMENT FUND Actual 7131/94 Estimated Propgsed Revenues/Other Sources Bond proceeds 0 0 0 1,300,000 Transfer In-Utility Fund 0 0 0 0 Assessment Income 11,228 5,922 6,098 1,060 Interest Income 1.068 1,261 1101 37,500 Tota Revenues 12,296 7,183 7,609 1,338,560 Expenditures Neighborhood Assessment Program (yr. 1) 0 0 0 1,300,000 Net Revenues 12,296 7,183 7,609 38,560 Beginning Fund Balance 19,786 32,082 32,082 39,691 Ending Fund Balance 2.9$ 39.265 39.691 78.251 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET liiiw 8 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 703-$1.5 MILLION FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget 1993 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,500,000 0 0 0 Interest income 45,265 36,736 41.736 25,000 Total Revenues/Sources of Funds 1,545,265 36,736 41,736 25,000 Expenditures Engineering contract 135,339 46,779 55,000 10,000 Administrative expenses(bond issuance) 24,437 0 0 0 N. Carroll-Dove/Burney 148,838 42,643 52,075 0 N. Carroll-SH114/Dove 0 86,158 86,158 463,661 N. Carroll-FM1709/SH114 0 0 0 392,763 S. Peytonville Road-FM1709/Continental Q 86.363 86.363 157,367 Total Expenditures 308,614 261,942 279,596 1,023,791 Net Revenues 1,236,651 (225,206) (237,860) (998,791) Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,236,651 1,236,651 998,791 Ending Fund Balance 1.236.651 1.011.445 998.791 g CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 9 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 700-$3.0 MILLION FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget 1994 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual 7/3 /94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Bond Proceeds (11/93) 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 Interest Income 0 79,638 96,638 75,000 Miscellaneous income 0 1.137 1.137 0 Total Revenue/Sources of Funds 0 3,080,775 3,097,775 75,000 Expenditures ' Engineering contract 0 74,134 80,000 93,000 B►vmlow-Continental/SH26 0 0 0 270,000 S. Carroll-1709/Continental 0 0 0 325,000 E. Dove-White Chapel/Carroll 0 0 0 325,000 E. Dove-Carroll/Kimball 0 0 0 575,000 N. White Chapel-1709/114 0 0 0 555,000 S. White Chapel-Continental/1709 0 0 0 325,000 Total Expenditures 0 74,134 80,000 2,468,000 Net Revenues 0 3,006,641 3,017,775 (2,393,000) Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 3,017,775 Ending Fund Balance Q 3.006.641 3.017.775 624.775 7,f-.,7;7 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 10 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 Fund 502 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget PERIMETER ROAD FEE FUND Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Perimeter Road Fees 29,865 48,876 72,876 76,000 Interest income 567 2.270 2.870 5.000 Total Revenues 30,432 51,146 75,746 81,000 Expenditures E. Continental (Timarron/Dominion participati 0 0 33.000 0 Total Expenditures 0 0 33,000 0 Net Revenues 30,432 51,146 42,746 81,000 Beginning Fund Balance 0 30,432 30,432 73,178 Ending Fund Balance 30.432 81.578 73"178 154.178 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET i 11 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 FUND 501 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND Actual /37 1/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues Transfer in-General Fund 0 0 0 820,026 Interest Income 0 0 0 20.500 Total Revenues/Other Sources 0 0 0 840,526 Expenditures Kimball Road 0 0 0 400,000 Randol Mill-1709 to Kingswood (County) 0 0 0 103,100 Vista Trails (Contractor) 0 0 0 163,000 Ridgecrest (County) 0 0 0 93,926 Summer Place drainage improvements 0 0 0 60,000 Engineering-ContinentaVSH26 RR crossing 0 0 0 20,500 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 840,526 Net Revenues 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 Ending Fund Balance 0 0 0 Q 7,f y CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED 1994-95 BUDGET 12 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY94-95 Fund 302 FY92-93 To Date Actual Budget SPDC REVENUE BOND PROJECTS Actual 7/31/94 Estimated Proposed Revenues/Other Sources Bond Proceeds 0 2,623,457 2,623,457 1,500,000 Interest income 0 13.212 18,000 38,750 Total Revenues/OtherSources 0 2,636,669 2,641,457 1,538,750 Expenditures Joint Use Improvements-Gymnasium 0 0 500,000 0 Bicentennial Park-Phase I Land Acquisition 0 253,651 253,651 0 Site Grading 0 0 50,000 0 Entry Road-drainage 0 0 133,000 0 Ball fields 4&5 0 0 0 174,600 Fields 6&7 0 0 0 261,400 Parking Lot Development/Utilities 0 0 0 470,055 Recreational Amenities 0 0 0 491,910 Soccer Area 0 0 0 19,000 Maintenance Building 0 0 0 100,000 Contingency 0 0 0 118,998 U.S. Corp of Engineer Property 0 0 0 1,000,000 Total Expenditures 0 253,651 936,651 2,635,963 Net Revenues/Other Sources 0 2,383,018 1,704,806 (1,097,213) Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 1,704,806 Ending Fund Balance 0 2"383.018 1.704.806 607.593 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-82 Rezoning Request/Ordinance No.480-142 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of a 3.122 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No.474,being a portion of Tract 11E and being the proposed Lot 1,E.C.White Addition LOCATION: East of South Kimball Ave., South of East Southlake Blvd., on the Northwest side of Crooked Lane OWNER/APPLICANT: E.C. White CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-l" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (Within 65 Ldn Airport Overlay Zone) NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: Two written responses received outside the 200' notification area: * Peter Sporrer. Area 7 SPIN Representative. 1214 Woodsey Ct., in favor; will be glad to see a home built there and the grass mowed,this will also alleviate the traffic blind spot on Crooked Lane. *Kelcie T.Nance. 1349 Crosstimbers Dr.,opposed;feels that the noise associated with the nearby airport runway is sufficient to disallow this rezoning request for residential use. P&Z ACTION: August 4, 1994; Approved(7-0) to table ZA 94-82 Rezoning Request at Applicant's request to the August 18, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. August 18, 1994; Approved(6-0) ZA 94-82 Rezoning Request. COUNCIL ACTION: September 6, 1994; Approved (6-0) First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-142 KPG/bls GAWPF\MEM0\CASES\94-82-7_WPD -� ' eeeeieiee —kin ■ •fir:: �•�■�•� � �� r:'.!:iiil � � ■� ■E ■ �� t �u PIP IL ■ r � v u © �:'■© n f:,�.11'7 L-0 9-126 •• 6`a` may ►S.1 f:TIrm L.di r l A f'lii i 1'Ab a f J f;mil:■ Wb l l I • f �I I SPIN #7 REPRUSENTATIVE: 1 . I PETER SPORRER 2 D i o D G. Thompson I "SF-1" PST�a T lo/ OAKS s V 41 I ME A E. C. White I 25A TR 11E q 16.96 AC C. Johnson I "AG" J. Forbus; "SF-1" 5 " "SF-1" TR 110 6 1.5 AC D. Faglie, v R. Baca � sF-1 �.�• G. FOXj TR 1103 2 AC 7 . SF-1" B. Struempler TR 5 "SF-1" 18.503 . 11 . I D. Robert "SF-1 I Ci TR J. McCuei ��00��04P 02 _ SOUTHLAKE CIl 10 TR 1101 567 2.5 AC AC I XT R % o M. Kendrick 1105A o o ADJACENT OWNERS TR 1105A1 .967 AC AND ZONING CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-142 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LOT 1, E.C. WHITE ADDITION, BEING 3.122 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"AG"AGRICULTURAL TO"SF-1"SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City mg under its Charter ado ed by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Tex onstitution and Chapter 9 of the as Local Government Code; and, WHERE A suant to Chapte of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the settlement agreement by and among the City of Southlake, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, American Airlines, Inc., and Delta Air Lines, Inc., made effective as of March 14, 1988, as well as Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479, adopted at the City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting of March 6, 1990, and has determined that the respective changes in the zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land should be made in accordance with such agreement and ordinance; and GAORMZONING\480.142 Page I �D- y WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as"AG"Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. GAORD70NING\480.l42 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: Lot 1,E.C. White Addition,being a 3.122 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No.474, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural to "SF-l" Single-Family Residential District. This property is located in the noise contour established for DFW Airport. Therefore, in addition to the regulations contained in Ordinance No. 480, as amended, this property is subject to the Airport Overlay Zone regulations set forth in Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. GAORDVONINM480.142 Page 3 Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORDWNING\480.142 Page 4 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORMZONING\480.142 Page 5 -- EXHIBIT"A" LOT 1 , E.C. WHITE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY,. TEXAS, BEING A TRACT IN THE THOKAS EASTER SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 474, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OT THE TRACT DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO E.C. WHITE AND WIFE ZADA WHITE OF RECORD IN VOLUME 7525, PAGE 2268, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING at a 5/81, iron found at the. Southeast corner of Lot 11 , Meadow Oaks Subdivision in the City of Southlake, as shown on a plat of record in Volume 388-129, Page 39, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N. 00-12' -00"W. 753.20 feet along the East line of said subdivision to a point in same for corner; THENCE S. 520-111 -07"E.- 452.71 feet to a point in the Westerly line of Crooked Lane for corner; THENCE along the westerly line of said Crooked Lane the following courses and distances; S.320-37' -00"W. 40.00 feet to a pipe found, S360-16'-00"W. 340.90 feet to a pipe found, S. 400-04'-00"W. 138.00 feet to a pipe found,and S.340-471 -00"W. 75.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3.122 acres. G wan\Z0ND4M4eo.uz Page 6 R City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-86 Rezoning Request(Formerly Tiffany Acres)/Ordinance No.480-13 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning Request of an 11.76 acre tract of land situated in Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 LOCATION: West side of Davis Blvd. F.M. 1938,approximately 875 feet North of Union Church (W. Continental Blvd.) (formerly Tiffany Acres Addition) OWNERS/APPLICANTS: V.J. Strand d/b/a V.J. Strand Excavating,Sally and Brad Scribner,Lee Roy Hess and Chris Cagle d/b/a Prestige Gunite, Inc., Robert Van Til, Individually and d/b/a Orlando Concrete, and Thomas Poteet CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "I-2" Heavy Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential, Mixed Use, 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen(13) RESPONSES: Nine written responses received within the 200' notification area: * E.I. Wiesman. 2607 W. Southlake Blvd., opposed; this rezoning would destroy the residential atmosphere,concerns are dust, noise and lighting. *Barbara Ann Dudley. 725 Davis Blvd., opposed; there will be more large vehicle traffic, more noise and more dust from unpaved road. * Mr. and Mrs. Bob Calhoun. 755 Davis Blvd.,opposed; they want to keep country setting for their home, the zoning of heavy industry will cause noise, dust and large buildings. * Olen and Pearl Goldsberrv. 10630 Davis Blvd., opposed; has lived here for 50 years and does not want sand blowing from large vehicles. *William__Lippincott. 820 N. Shady Oaks Dr.,opposed;owns property to the West and South, Industrial zoning would decrease his property value since the City of Southlake recently rezoned his property to Residential. * A.W. and June Haney. 400 Brock Dr., opposed. �11 City of Southlake,Texas *Onal White.900 Davis Blvd.,opposed;noise, dust and diesel fumes 'pollute the environment,the area is aesthetically unpleasing, further expansion of businesses would worsen an already difficult to cope with situation. * Scott Ducoff.Davis Industrial Partners, 3301 Airport Fwy..Bedford, in favor; The property has been used for heavy industrial for many years and the location near a busy highway makes this the best use. * Morris. Billie.Tim. Pam, Kathy. Tracy. and M. Farmer, 684 Davis, opposed; noise, dust and diesel fumes pollute the environment, the area is aesthetically unpleasing,further expansion of businesses would worsen an already difficult to cope with situation. Nineteen written response received from outside the 200' notification area: * J.L. Clow. 820 Shady Oaks Dr., opposed; Industrial zoning is not compatible with adjacent single family residential and property values will decrease. * John and Sandra Parry. 105 Brock Dr.,opposed;more noise and they are losing the quality of their neighborhood. *Per y and Vera Vargas.209 Brock Dr.,opposed;does not fit the quiet country quality of life, and will cause possible flooding. * Louise Ard.303 Brock Dr., opposed;not good for the neighborhood. * Martha Horton. 320 Brock Dr., opposed; does not want any more traffic and noise. * Alan and Carolyn Peters. 200 Brock Dr., opposed; heavy industry will be detrimental to quiet neighborhood. * Paul J. Schaeter. 2910 W. Southlake Blvd., opposed; does not want noise and pollution in a residential area. *E. John and Nancy Keller. 2906 W. Southlake Blvd., opposed; does not want heavy industrial in quiet country atmosphere of residential area, the strip malls are enough. * Stony and Julie Stubbs. 158 Jellico Circle, opposed; this is a bad use for this property. * Nan Medcalf. 127 Jellico Circle, opposed; unsafe and too much heavy traffic. * Dorothy Sammons. 2451 Union Church. Keller, opposed. * Brenda Covington. 605 Llano Ct., opposed; more traffic. * Mindy Thomas. 705 Liberty Ct., opposed; unsightly, terrible first impression. * Coralee Brannon. 1365 Lakeview Dr., opposed; does not conform to land use map, heavy industry is not appropriate since it is near residential area. * Ed and Melinda Downing. 1354 Woodbrook Ln.,opposed;this is the wrong place for"I-2". * Steve and Carroll Ovelgonne. 1352 Ten Bar Trail, opposed; this is the wrong place for "I-2" District. * Jimmy and Barbara Hornick. 1994 N. Peytonville, opposed; heavy industrial is unsightly and unsafe. City of Southlake,Texas * Majorie A. Panillard. 319 Brock Dr., opposed;does not want added noise and disturbance created by long'businss hours and heavy equipment. * Barbara Hudgens. 725 Davis Blvd., opposed; noise, dust and diesel fumes pollute the environment, the area is aesthetically unpleasing, further expansion of businesses would worsen an already difficult to cope with situation. P&Z ACTION: August 18, 1994; Approved (5-1) to Deny ZA 94-86 Rezoning Request. COUNCIL ACTION: September 6, 1994; Approved (6-0) to table ZA 94-86 Rezoning Request to the September 20, 1994 City Council Meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the Commission's recommendation to deny, a super-majority vote of the City Council will be required to approve the request. It should also be noted that more than 20%of the land area within 200' of the request has expressed opposition. The plat of Tiffany Acres was abandoned by instrument filed in V. 10023, Pg. 1625, DRTCT. The restrictions for that addition were abandoned by instrument filed in V. 388-121, Pg. 33, PRTCT. KPG/bls GAWPF\MEM0\CASES\94-86-7-WPD � '" _I- .OWN ©OVk U EWA; NU NEW © EPA©0 ® . 1 ` ♦ W - LL - w ^ ♦ Q t7 < w^ }cc m cr N 1'1 Cc ~N r O I <U t O 0 ^< it; o i 3— cc(� en < 2 on ! N w �-- N ^ Cc 7 r a ; ¢ or O't �. LBtot t!1 cc u ' U r mo < c ^ m N O< CC N caCL u < Q � ~N O U co 1 M e i C C �C CC in u 19 in Cc cc a m __— ----------sis asi ��odev�.._-ee�r� --------- LO6 OSI H3TIA— zu Z o 30 4LU z CD NNU ¢'COY •O m U. < r < < C cc N € � m co �� Oz tL N N °tf O N �m z N N< O rNLU N ¢„ cca V z r ¢N r o oa eo o � � o a n �0 r w <1 in � m n r i OCL ~ _ C C v m 0cc rn — •¢- W te u m< h •O 2�+ � /1 O / l m !!1 � N P1 - •Imp' '-tL•N i ¢ in " e J °` CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-139 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS BEIN AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM MONSOON - TO . SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as:,,,,..., gander the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the GAORMZONING480.139 Page 1 l S,NA Irl facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does fmd that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: GAORMZONINGk480.139 Page 2 Bein a acre tract of land situated in the w and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" Emma attached hereto and incorporated herein, from to ON W40111*0 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court GAORDVONING\480.139 Page 3 or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORDVONINa480.l39 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORMZONING\480.139 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING AT AN' IRON ROD IN THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. HIGHWAY_ NO. 1938 (DAVIS BLVD.) , SAID POINT BEING LOCATED NORTH 880 FEET AND WEST 35 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID J. G. ALLEN SURVEY; THENCE N 87°48'10" W A DISTANCE OF* 2153.96 FEET TO AN IRON ROD FOR CORNER; THENCE N 1'03'05" E A DISTANCE OF 440.31 FEET TO AN IRON ROD FOR CORNER; THENCE S 88011'35" E A DISTANCE OF 1153.14 FEET TO AN IRON ROD FOR CORNER IN THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. HIGHWAY NO. 1938; THENCE S 0'58'15" W ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 448.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAIN- ING 11.76 ACRES OF LAND. GA0RD\Z0NlNGWM.139 Page 6 SSA-I� City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 19, 1994 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Revised submittal for Coventry Enclosed is a revised submittal for David McMahan's project Coventry which we received around noon today. We have not had a chance to review this submittal but wanted to forward it to you ASAP to allow you time to review. I note the following changes upon first glance. 1. He is removing several areas from the PUD request to reduce the calculated opposition due to the fact that the PUD request would no longer would be within 200' of certain properties previously opposed to the request. He has told us that his calculations now put the opposition at 14%. This would not require the supermajority vote by Council. 2. The tracts that are being omitted are shown as "proposed SF1A". This is not a part of the request before you. He has chosen not to modify his PUD request to include the one acre lots because this would not change the calculation of the opposition. He is going to submit applications for the SF1A and process them as separate zoning requests. Should Council desire to approve the PUD as modified on first reading, we would have to table the second reading until the SF1A request caught up in order to approve them simultaneously,eliminating a split-lot zoning approval. (i.e. He has one large lot that would have PUD on only a portion and AG on the remainder pieces. The remainder pieces are not of sufficient size to leave AG, therefore he must request an appropriate zoning.) 3. The PUD request as amended apparently shows a density of 1.0 unit per acre (82 lots/82.3acres). This meets the description of Low Density as described in the 1993 Land Use Plan update. I realize this is a lot of changes at the last minute. Please feel free to call me (ext 744) or Karen Gandy (ext 743) if you have any questions. GL/gl cc: Curtis Hawk, City Manager GAW KNEMOISTAFRcovent1 e- COVENTRY StP I9 199.E r A Planned Unit Development Residential Commune City of Southlake, Texas INTRODUCTION This proposal is made by Pima Properties, Inc. on behalf of the current property owners described herein requesting the property be rezoned from Agriculture to a Planned Unit Development to be known as Coventry. The 82.26 acre project will be improved as a single family residential community and will feature approximately 14.3 acres of neighborhood park and recreational areas. It is intended that this development blend with the adjacent land uses through the utilization of the open areas and larger lot sizes around the perimeter of the development. In addition to creating an attractive residential community consistent with the high standards established by the City of Southlake, the development will also make available sewer capacity for a large part, if not all, of the area known as the Higgins Creek drainage basin. This presentation to the City of Southlake will document and provide information in three areas: 1) Review of the existing site with its current ownership, uses, natural features, etc. , and review of surrounding conditions such as, adjacent zoning, land uses, perimeter streets, etc. ; 2) Description of the proposed development concept for the requested PUD including land use and the integration with the surrounding uses, density, development standards and requirements, mandatory home owners association, sidewalk system and park/open areas; 3) Detailed description and evaluation of on-site and off-site development improvements including paving, storm water drainage, water and sewer facilities and the benefits of the integration of each into the surrounding properties and general area. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Coventry will be located south and west of State Hwy. 114 between Peytonville and Shady Oaks Roads. Peytonville Rd. is the western boundary of the property and Shady Oaks Rd. at the confluence of West Highland St. is the eastern boundary. The property is Z- shaped with a small cut out in the western portion for a cemetery. The property, is for the most part, unimproved except for five (5) existing residential structures and their associated structures Coventry Zoning Request pgl (garages, barns, etc. ) . All existing structures will be removed. The general area of Coventry is primarily zoned Agriculture with the exception of two single family residential developments across Peytonville to the west ,Trail Creek and Cedar Creek Plantation, and Garden Addition at the northeast corner of the subject property. All three of these subdivisions have a minimum lot size of one acre. In addition, single family residences on 1 to 10 acre size parcels back up to the subject property along both Shady Oaks and Peytonville Roads. Moreover, the subject property is located in District 3 of the City's Land Use Plan and is primarily allocated as a low density residential area except for a very small portion on the south end of the property is which is allocated for medium density residential. The property is heavily wooded except for the area along Peytonville Rd. and rises to a ridge from both Peytonville as well as Shady Oaks Roads. These ridges fall again to the center of the property creating a pleasing undulating effect over the terrain. In creating the development plan for Coventry, the varied land uses zonings, and configuration of the surrounding properties was taken into consideration and the plan was formulated so as to create a suitable and appropriate utilization of the subject property. OWNERSHIP ,, The respective properties are currently owned by the following parties: Thirty Three and one/half acres extending from the intersection of Highland and Shady Oaks westward in an L shape is owned by Helen M. Taylor; Forty Nine acres situated on the east side of Peytonville Rd. in a rectangular shape is owned by Helen M. Bradley, Harry J. Bradley as Trustee of the Helen M. Bradley Trust, Randolph J. Bradley et ux, Donna J. Bradley and Harry J. Bradley et ux Beverly Bradley. PROPOSED SITE ZONING AND LAND USE The proposed zoning of Coventry is a Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") according to section 30 of the City of Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Number 480-M, dated September 19, 1989, and in further compliance with subsection 30.7, item 2a, requiring submittal of a Development Site Plan. The proposed land use for Coventry is for single family, detached residential units with a maximum density of 1 unit per acre or 82 residential lots. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT Coventry Zoning Request pg2 The goal of the development process is to create a high quality residential community which blends well within its immediate environment as well as the entire City of Southlake. Primary access to the subdivision will be located off Peytonville Rd. as shown on the plans enclosed herein. A secondary entrance will be located off Shady Oaks Rd. at the end of Highland Street. The internal curvilinear streets with many cul de sacs coupled with the natural rise and fall of the terrain will create an extremely pleasant and appealing ambiance for the community. The Development Site Plan presented with this proposal calls for a configuration and lot plan to compliment the surrounding zoning and uses. Specifically, the lots backing to Peytonville Road are a minimum of 43,560 sq. ft. in size, while the lots adjacent to those larger single family areas backing up to the subject property along Peytonville and Shady Oaks Roads will be at least 30,000 sq. ft. in size. In addition the lots backing to Peytonville will have a landscaped earth berm along the rear, adjacent to Peytonville, creating, along with the proposed neighborhood park a very pleasing drive-by effect from Peytonville. On the Shady Oaks frontage there will be an open area varying from approximately 300 to 500 feet deep which will create a look that will be substantially the same as it appears today. The park along Peytonville will be improved with the creation of a lake or series of connected lakes surrounded by a jogging trail. The open area along Shady Oaks is slated to remain close to its existing condition except for the clearing of underbrush and of course removing the existing improvements. Both areas, along with the cemetery, will be maintained by the home owners association to be formed. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Except for the neighborhood park, cemetery, and open area along Shady Oaks, all of the property within Coventry will be used for single family detached residential development. All lots within the community will be improved with sidewalks. Utility distribution facilities, temporary buildings and associated facilities for construction purposes and temporary real estate sales offices shall be permitted under the requested PUD. Special exception uses as approved by the City of Southlake Board of Adjustment as authorized under Section 44.12 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance shall also be included in the PUD. Finally, any use accessory to an approved special exception use shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies within the conditions for an accessory use. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Coventry Zoning Request pg3 The following development regulations shall be applicable within Coventry: 1. Minimum Lot Size - 21,500 square feet except 43 ,560 square feet along Peytonville Rd and 30,000 square feet along the western and eastern property lines as shown on the site plan enclosed herein. 2. Minimum Lot Width - One hundred (100) feet, except eighty-five (85) feet as measured on the curve of the building line where over fifty percent (50%) of the lot is on the curve of a cul- de-sac. 3 . Minimum Lot Depth - One hundred Fifty (150) feet, except two hundred thirty (290) feet for those lots which back up to Peytonville Road. 4. Minimum Floor Area - Two Thousand (2,700) square feet. 5. Maximum Height - 2-1/2 stories or thirty-five (35) feet. 6. Minimum Front Yard - Thirty (30) feet, except for forty (40) feet for those lots which are 40,000 square feet or larger. 7. Minimum Rear Yard - Forty (40) feet. Except one hundred (100) feet for lots which back up to Peytonville Road. 8. Minimum Side Yard - Fifteen (15) feet for all lots between 20,000 and 30,000 square feet; twenty (20) feet on all lots greater that are 30,000 square feet or greater. 9. Side Yard Adjacent to a Street - Twenty (20) feet. 10. Maximum Lot Coverage - Thirty percent (30%) on all lots between 20,000 and 30,000 square feet; twenty percent (20%) on all lots 30,000 square feet or greater. 11. Maximum Residential Density - 1 unit per gross acre. Pursuant to the City of Southlake zoning ordinance for a Planned Unit Development, at least ten percent (10%) of the gross area, exclusive of those areas to be dedicated to perimeter roads, will be set aside and improved as common open space. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION A home owners association will be established and be in place from the outset of the development whereby all homeowners will be members of the association. The responsibilities of the association will be to maintain all community owned common areas and to enforce the Coventry deed restrictions in order to maintain the quality, character and values of Coventry. Coventry Zoning Request pg4 3 ' �W ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ROADWAYS As previously discussed, the proposed Coventry community is bounded by two existing roadways. The roadways include N. Peytonville Ave. on the west and Shady Oaks Dr. on the east. W. Highland Ave. intersects with Shady Oaks at the east entry of the proposed Coventry community. These streets are two lane asphalt roadways. The proposed roadway alignment for the Coventry community as shown on the Development Site Plan contained in Plate 1 is subject to modification based on the final plat presented to the city of Southlake. As currently planned, there are to be two ingress/egress locations into the community; one on N. Peytonville Ave. and one on Shady Oaks Dr. DRAINAGE The Coventry community is situated on a ridge in the Denton Creek (Lake Grapevine, a water supply & flood control reservoir) drainage basin. The majority of the acreage flows to the east into the south fork of the Kirkwood Branch. The remaining acreage flows westward into the Higgins Branch. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for both branches have been performed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) . In addition to the COE analyses, there have been independent hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for drainage improvements in the following developments: Trail Creek Addition, Cedar Creek Plantation, Garden Addition, and Ravenaux Place. These analyses have been reviewed and approved by the city of Southlake. All streets and drainage improvements will be designed to control the stormwater runoff in accordance with the city of Southlake subdivision criteria. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The Coventry community will be served by an existing 8" water line in N. Peytonville Ave. and a 6" water line in Shady Oaks. The design of the on-site water distribution system for the entire project would include an 8" water line between N. Peytonville Ave. and Shady Oaks. Thereby providing an additional cross connection in the overall water distribution system. (40, Coventry Zoning Request pg5 SEWERAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM ' ,,. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by two lift stations. One of the lift stations will be located within the project at the northeast sector. The second lift station will be located within the project at the souteast sector near Shady Oaks Rd. Both lift stations will pump to a gravity sewer line on the west side of the project. An off-site sanitary sewer interceptor line designated as N-1 (Master Sanitary Sewer Plan, Plate 2) will be constructed from an existing lift station in the Maguire-Thomas development along the Kirkwood Branch to Higgins Branch. Then south along Higgins Branch to a existing drainage and utility easement in Trail Creek Addition. The interceptor line would continue on along Higgins Branch to the North property line of Cross Timber Hills. A 6" collector line would then be constructed from Higgins Branch through Trail Creek to Coventry. The sewerage collection system will be designed in accordance with the city of Southlake subdivision criteria. All design efforts will be closely coordinated with the city's engineering staff. SUMMARY Coventry is designed and will be developed as a high quality single family residential subdivision with most serious consideration being given to the surrounding zoning and uses so as to blend in with and become a part of the area. We respectfully request the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council consider and approve a change in zoning from ."AG" agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development District pursuant to the criteria presented and discussed herein. Coventry Zoning Request pg6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager M� '; Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator U ZA 94-88 Rezoning and Development Plan/Coventry/Ordinance No. 480-144 QUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Development Plan for Coventry, being a 103.76 acre tract of land situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706, being Tracts 1 & 1C, 1A, 1B, 3A, 3C, 11B, and Lots 1 & 2, Bradley ddition. \ e development proposes 127 lots, 2,700 sq. ft. homes, 1.23 du/ac., and average lot size of 24,500 sq. ft. " OAT West of Shady Oaks Dr., North of W. Southlake Blvd., on the East side of N. Peytonville, approximately 1/2 mile South of W. Dove St. WNERS: - Helen Taylor and Harry J. Bradley PLICANT: PIMA Properties, Inc. URRENT ZONIN "AG" Agricultural QUESTED ZONIN "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development AND USE CATEGOR Low Density Residential SENT Thirty-five (35) RES N Twenty-one written responses received within the 200' notification area: * Lorn Bolton, 1200 Cypress Creek Ct., opposed; wants to keep one acre lots and is concerned about drainage problems. * Pete W. and Mary Smith. 596 Garden Ct., opposed; developments should be restricted to one acre lots in accordance to Land Use Plan. * Bob L. Ramsey. 1650 N. Shady Oaks, opposed; concerned about drainage, and lot sizes do not conform to surrounding one acre lots. * J.L. Clow. 820 N. Shady Oaks Dr., in favor; this is a logical use of the land at this time. * Fernando A and Bertha G. Casas 1201 Plantation Dr., opposed; appreciates the changes that were made in this proposal but is still to this development. Concerns are increased traffic, drainage, and less than one acre lots. City of Southlake,Texas * Glen. Alice and Norman Burgess. 1253 N. Peytonville, opposed; small lots are not consistent with surrounding one acre lots, there will be increased traffic and explosive growth to school system resulting in higher taxes, and there will be more water run off. * Don J. and Annette Weeks. 1325 N. Peytonville Ave., opposed; increased amount of concrete will create larger drainage problems, narrow roads will not handle increased traffic, existing schools can't handle more students, and larger cities bring more crime. * K.L. Sumner. 1205 N. Peytonville, opposed; prefers "SF-1" to comply with the Land Use Plan. * Everett and Maryellen 1201 Cypress Creek Circle, opposed; they do not want high density homes,they want one acre lots, and drainage problems will increase. * John and Ellen C. McCully. 605 W. Highland, wants low density development and rural atmosphere to remain, wants one acre lots, and they are concerned about traffic, drainage/flooding, and poorly maintained roads. * Andrea Sanchez. 1440 Shady Oaks, opposed; her concerns are the increases in population,traffic, taxes and crime,the small lot sizes and water run off, and other negative factors that will occur. * Rita Ann Salinas. 1440 Shady Oaks, opposed; she is concerned that drainage issues and sewer capacity issues have not been addressed. * Jane Grant. 601 W. Highland, opposed. ,.. * M.M. Hardy, 1100 N. Shady Oaks, opposed; concerns are increased traffic and small lot size. * A.B., Garnetta and Joseph Stanyer. 1200 Post Oak Trail, opposed; want one acre lots. *Lanxand Sheila Croy. 1550 N Shady Oaks,opposed;wants one acre lots . * Mike and Jelynn Hall 1255 Shady Oaks, opposed; feels area should remain low density,is concerned about safety,inadequate roads,traffic, and water drainage. * Ben and Mares R. Goodman 1700 Shady Oaks, opposed. * Raymond and Karol Welsh. 698 Garden Court, opposed; the rural character of this area should be preserved, one acre lots should be the minimum, the streets are not suited to the resulting increased traffic, ' and sewer problems will occur with this development. * Tames and Wanda Glover. 1355 N Peytonville,opposed; wants rural atmosphere to remain, wants one acre lots, and they are concerned about traffic, flooding, high density and inadequate roads. * Bob and Ann Hinman, 1600 N. Shady Oaks Dr.,opposed ; Land Use Plan is Low Density, and concerned with drainage onto their property. Three property owners within the 200' notification signed petitions received on September 6, 1994. * Toe and Gloria Barlean 1360 N Shady Oaks Dr., opposed. * Wanda Buschman, 1201 Post Oak Tr., opposed. * Patricia M. Moore 1680 N Peytonville, opposed. City of Southlake,Texas *Awl Sixteen written responses received from outside the 200' notification area: * Paul and Lee Fahrenbrook. 1865 North Peytonville Rd., opposed; their concerns are: 20,000 sq. ft. lot size is unacceptable, safety of children in the neighborhood,reduced property values,will overburden the current streets, and will destroy the low density environment. * Robin Jones. 510 Ravenaux, SPIN #11 Representative, opposed; concerns are: loss of trees, traffic congestion, large construction vehicles in area, and approval of this request will destroy the rural setting. * John E. Janbaz. 1302 Plantation Dr., opposed; density of housing is too high, does not comply with the Land Use Plan, rural atmosphere and excellent school system are being threatened. * Harold Knight. 1749 E. Highland, in favor; developer will provide main sewer trunk line to the Northwest quadrant of the City thus alleviating the citizens of Southlake having to pay to provide sewer in this area. * Mike Robertson. 1212 Cross Timber, opposed; lots should be a minimum of one acre or not be developed so that surrounding properties will not be affected. * Joseph M. Reilly, 1275 Shady Oaks Drive, opposed; existing grade of roads and sewer facilities are consistent with low density development-not medium density, increased traffic will cause a safety concern at street intersections, the proposed sewer is not consistent with the existing city plan, drainage problems will increase. * Gary and Julie Stakes. 1281 Post Oak Trail, opposed; one acre lots should be provided for, sewer should be connected at the time the developer starts to sell lots, traffic studies and road improvements should be done to alleviate traffic problems, ample set backs of major through roads and plantings of trees as a buffer to maintain a rural feeling should be provided. * Donnie Darr. 1241 Post Oak Trail, opposed; concerned are: the high density, surrounding properties are one acre, storm-water run off, increased traffic, heavy construction traffic, deed restrictions of Coventry will not be adhered to. * R.J. Maness. 420 Ravenaux Dr., opposed; concerns are drainage issues, safety of residents and children walking to and from school, and increased traffic. * Richard Crowe. 1502 Plantation,requested additional information on this item. * Margaret Burnette. 1002 Quail Run Rd., opposed; does not conform to Low Density on Land Use Plan. * O. Alan Wood. 700 Garden Ct., opposed. * Janice Coulter. 694 Garden Ct. , opposed; concerned with increased traffic, possible flooding, and wants low density neighborhood. * David Margraf.701 Garden Ct.,opposed;deviates from master plan, City of Southlake,Texas lots should be one acre, drainage issues have not been addressed, and impact of this development is negative. * Alan and Susan Egerton. 696 Garden Ct., opposed; wants area to comply with the Master Plan, and they are concerned about drainage. * Cindy M. Allen. 5208 Telluride Lane, Dallas, opposed; she owns a lot on Garden Ct. and plans to build a home in Southlake. Petitions were received on September 6, 1994 with signatures totaling 233 opposed. This total included 31 signatures from property owners which are within the 200' notification area and who have already sent written responses noted above. leaving a total of 202 signatures opposed from outside the 200' notification area; written concerns are that this zoning change deviates from the Land Use Plan, the request does not conform to existing surrounding property development, the request does not adequately address drainage issues and sewer capacity, and it does not address the negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. P&Z ACTION: August 18, 1994; Approved (3-2-1) ZA 94-88 Rezoning and Development Plan for Coventry subject to the Plan Review Summary dated August 12, 1994 deleting item#5 recommendation that the East- West street intersecting N. Peytonville Ave. be aligned with Post Oak Trail,and recommending item#14.c. to Council-60'R.O.W. (2 lanes) on the road connecting Shady Oaks Drive to N. Peytonville Ave. COUNCIL ACTION: September 6, 1994; Approved (4-2) to table ZA 94-88 Rezoning and Development Plan request to the September 20, 1994 City Council Meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the second Plan Review Summary dated September 2, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached third Plan Review Summary dated September 16, 1994. KPG/bls GAWPH\MEM0\CASES\94-88-ZD.WPD i -•---... ..---- - -----••-- •--- a ,SGAGN 1..c t.ae• / , la a.c u I , K 1 i ,.. _ - "SF-1A" i •SF-1A• t lS.c a w. f. Gu. ^AG" 1. ttetcll a s a.y wttt F. BEEOY AOEN ��N 1 SA-72Y .AG. S.-c \ 1.IWta t. G.4u ra. 1 14 `\ V �t.afa: I f_x • AO Is ll SF-lA• ( a.1 } 32 1 =*is.,c t �� a - J1 L. cc.F I fa� + 1R ar At t :.n.c M dUX v� fat it.11 1 J. ct.t 1u11 jig M=f i f 3 l� +.%'c 'SF-2A. C� y tcl"1 M x {�✓ i tw 1 J. Sallua �•J1G 1 Ln K 1 1 � I 1 _ ,. tarleaa t.t >» y Z i e K p M. Allen 1 D.wtt.. _ a --- — ci _ rwKt.1 'AG• - ra C. UL111at� I g Ap ,. Wctat 1 a K — atar.tt LL,D� t A� Pp 3`:3 K 1 u xl p13 I TwKT. A33e J. Glover ` ` L°"f�t ' 000-- I •AG• .A�. TR �i / .1 �_.AG. r. vsak.a c 0 I Tw.l ra �.SZ•'' 30 3.66.< 3 K = K. t....cd 59 t T.30 1 TK3A1 a 1..7 t C. Wcteaa = l..0� r gU i "AG" o wall s •SF-lA" �I c. Jeaea tw.3.2 C. I .' yx J. Kc C.1ty /"c tll KEtw....• i .AG. u , Q ' uut� V } 1 J. C1.Y K. K.cdy A.C—c 3 1 ta.lt F. L. K t t I _— I } ' I 'watt= ADJACENT OWNERS - — ,, AND ZONING i 99 a ■. •� Abm— NO RJURPIP9 � © ■:11111��• Rill Him .ram-:. r� _ i:�� E� MCI MAI t D��►!\i Ow WIN IN j■�" ,� ' ',�.�-�� , �� war��r1��rirr- M :.R.. City of Southlake,Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY (sow, CASE NO: ZA 94-88 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF REVIEW: 09/16/94 PROJECT NAME: Development Plan for Coventry (formerly OakRidge), being 103.76 acres situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, Tracts 1 and 1C, 1A, 1B, 3A, 3C, and Lots 1 and 2. Bradley Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Pima Properties, Inc. J. E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 5215 N. O'Connor, Suite 200 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104 Irving, Texas 75035 Southlake. Texas 76092 Phone:(214) 444-8322 Phone: (817) 481-3313 Fax: (214) 869-4550 Fax: (817) 481-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/14/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KAREN GANDY AT (817)481-5581, EXT. 743. DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW: 1. The Subdivision Ordinance (5.03-K-1) requires street stubs at 1,000' intervals. This would require that a stub be provided to the South through the J.L. Clow property. 2. Although the offset is greater than the 125' required b ordinance a rox. 300' shown), Staff g g q Y ( PP ) recommends that the East-West street intersecting North Peytonville Avenue be aligned with Post Oak Trail to create a safer intersection along North Peytonville Avenue. 3. Show the front building lines for all lots. 4. Show any proposed walls, fencing, or screening devices (i.e. berms) and label the type and height. 5. Show or note the proposed sidewalks mentioned in the development narrative. 6. The Thoroughfare Plan indicates an extension of West Highland Avenue to the West as a 70' arterial along the southern boundary of this property. Some alternatives to this issue are as follows: a. Delete requirement and approve as submitted. May need to widen R.O.W. at Shady Oaks to accommodate turn lanes. b. Require 70' R.O.W. (4 lanes) on the road connecting Shady Oaks Drive to North Peytonville Avenue. c. Require 60' R.O.W. (2 lanes) on the road connecting Shady Oaks Drive to North Peytonville Avenue. City of Southlake,Texas DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REVIEW: 7. Insure that all references to acreage, densities, etc. are consistent between the plan and the narrative. 8. On Page 4, item 4, correct the square footage to read: "two thousand seven hundred." * The Engineering Staff will review the engineering analyses of roadways, drainage, water distribution system, sewerage collection system described on Pages 5 and 6. * Staff will coordinate street name approvals with the fire department staff prior to final plat submittal. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by September 26, 1994. All revised submittals should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 11" x 17" reduction. Please provide revised Development Regulations also. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Pima Properties, Inc. John Levitt Engineers Inc. Harry J. Bradley, 1645 N. Peytonville Ave., Southlake, 76092 Helen Taylor, 1200 Shady Oaks, Southlake, 76092 Ph Ph Ii I Jig It lip I if SM E M r H Ni ,.j 3 11 Is IQ14 1 l3i TV 1!11 Mf fill if 1. Ml Will Ril 1 li 1: nh il i No 21 z 1*21 New w,NN JIP i .oiwaJ•�i's:ut=. — �:.--r�• I i b 4 12 1 6 i"t I gel '13N 3851M u ff" F7 7L u .x '13 NORM 'g ai 51 N, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-144 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEIN MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM TO SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as"AGf`ArtoUlt under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these GAORMZONING480.144 Page i p /� ` changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the rr facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: GAORMZONING\480.144 Page 2 UL7•— Being acre tract of land situated in the k d more fully and com letel described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and inco rated herein,from to Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances GAORMZOMNG480.144 Page 3 affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORMZONING\480.144 Page 4 -i3 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORMZONING1480.144 Page 5 f, EXHIBIT "A" All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land located in the T. M. [food Survey, Abstract 706, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being all of that certain 60.93 acre tract conveyed to [tarry J. and Helen M. Bradley by Deed recorded in Volume:1749, Page 493, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and all of that certain 43.83 acre tract conveyed to Earnest E. and Helen Taylor by Deeds recorded in Volume 2312, Page 624, Volume 2741, Page 267 and Volume 3863, Page 460, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described in one tract as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron. pin in centerline of Peytonville Avenue said rod also being the northwest corner of the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract 106 and the southwest corner of a 13.0 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 6386, Page 973, Deed - Records, Tarrant- County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East 1,966_45 feet along the south line of said 13.0 acre tract (at 1,870.01 feet passing a 3/4 inch iron rod at the southeast corner of said 13.0 acre tract) to a 1/2 'i'neh iron rod at the northwest corner of a 5.00 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 8759, Page 64, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West 325.41 feet along the west line of said 5.00 acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of a 3.02 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 5064, Page 310, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 13 minutes 26 .seconds East 200.16 feet along the west line of said 3.02 acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of a 2.81 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 6928, Page 314, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 34 minutes 48 seconds West 183.96 feet along the west line of said 2.81 'acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of a 3.0 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 6926, Page 314, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 36 minutes 42 seconds West 194.36 feet along the west line of said 3.0 acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of a 2.49 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 5169, Page 553, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 07 minutes 39 seconds West 157.51 feet along the west line-of said 2.49 acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of a 5.3 acre tract according to the Deed Recorded in Volume 3912, Page 74, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 45 minutes 34 seconds West 287.79 feet along the west line of said 5.3 acre tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northeast corner of a 13.75 acre tract according to the Deed Recorded in Volume 3663, Page 460, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 45 minutes West 528.70 feet along the east Line of said 13.75 acre tract to the northeast corner of a 24.55 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 23L2, Page 624, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; G.\ORD\ZONING\480.144 Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE South 00 degrees 42 minutes West 579.72 feet to a common ell corner of said 24.55, acre tract; THENCE South 69 degrees 52 minutes East 658.33 feet to the northeast corner of said 24.55 acre tract; THENCE South 214.44 feet to the northeast corner of a 5.53 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 2741, Page 267, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 45 minutes West 147.20 feet to the southeast corner of said 5.53 acre tract; THENCE West 1,635.56 feet to the southwest corner of said 5.53 acre tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 45 minutes East 147_20 feet to the northwest corner of said 5.53 acre tract and a point in the south line of said 24.55 acre tract; THENCE West 116-96 feet to the southwest corner of said 24.55 acre tract; THENCE North 809.97 feet to the northwest corner of said 24_55 acre tract and the southernmost southwest corner of said 13.75 acre tract; THENCE North 01 degrees 04 minutes East 496-5 feet for a common eLL corner of said 13.75 acre tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 44 minutes West 878_42 feet to the westerly southwest corner of said 13.75 acre tract; THENCE North 01 degrees 06 minutes 56 seconds East 1,397.36 feet along the centerline of Peytonville Avenue to the Point of Beginning and containing 103-76 acres. SAVE AND EXCEPT ONE TRACT of land known as Hood Cemetery and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the centerline of PeytonvilLe Avenue said rod also being at the northwest corner of the T. H. Hood Survey Abstract 706, and the southwest corner of a 13.0 acre tract according to the Deed recorded in Volume 6386, Page 973, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 06 minutes 56 seconds West 637.35 feet along the centerline of Peytonville Avenue to a point; THENCE South 84 degrees 49 minutes 26 seconds East 580.18 feet (at 557.18 feet passing a 1/2 inch iron rod at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Bradley Addition to the city of. SouthLake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the Plat recorded in Volume 388-170, Page 3L, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas) to a 1/2 inch iron rod in the south line of Lot 1 and the Point of Beginning; THENCE South 05 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds West 208.71 feet to a L/2 inch iron rod; G.\ORD\ZONING1480.144 Page 7 '�X7 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE South 64 degrees 49 minutes 26 seconds Bast 208.7L feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; THENCE North 05 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds East 208.71 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod in the south line of Lot 1; THENCE North 84 degrees 49 minutes 26 seconds West 208.71 feet along the south line of Lot 1 to a 1/2 inch iron rod and the Point of Beginning and containing 1.00 acres. G:\ORD\ZONINGW80.144 Page 8 EXHIBIT "B" Z o Iltli'li '-!ji IIi;I t!1° i!I iq` IIl` i!i i!1° i;s = ' it Via E f i. .11j !_� 511� i I— [..i as X z i3 f s! a !•1 i i i ! i i± 1 za: f i t z ! Z "z�' a ,oi:11 'i• ij 1 !fl i f I, m 5— u •_• 3 1•. i,ai' 1 I F 1 I 1. 1 i = 1 I i i j I i•i i y �� Z < H- i T } = II ft ,, 1 1I-i It jij11 t i i, 1 lh ;I isit Is isi! 1;lI tII Fs i . a , '� W F� 1= !iI j"=-z i �a it iz I. f 1 1 f a ! L z o 1 , i i , f f i=,a{�;lII� =L= I;Ti l;d 1'd I;i� 1�=i 1'F1 :1= : I 1 i-i li 11i i t;11 Ilia 1!1=1;: 11 1a,i. � o j jl:I f=I M; zl ,=.1 ,ial :a, ,., til ,il , ,�if F _ 1 i i'tIi 1 i = ' ,Is a,: , :1 y Q a rn (1•, ,li'i;lll"Is ,11 1 1 ';Ei 11, isi s11 jei f! i!1 111 li . a J, ;!� > o a �; l7: 1:' i3d 1]j a, sa ;� 1q 1 1 i sit 1 lI `��1 li �� ` F` E s1:III:-f �;'1 I •I I :'1 s I I'1., f l si, f 1 S if i , ,Ili l�al!•� � ' f s-! a ` s, = f s s, _ •1 TF;:__'I�1 1!I• iji' ji, l:I• � j hl f ! 1 1 f s li 1�13'I;jlil]I'I=I'ii 1'i' 1'II 1'lI 1'1` lii! ;�i =1;==1 I;: 1; 1 IF== II I T 11 II' in 1 !t _ ! ii a i I{ , 1 IIN ilja1z11) fist,I'' r ,I I ,F ,F i sFIl 19 al 17 a;i s s stli al a!al l=fl=1� ,1 ls'_1j ,�� Ili {i; T; il, il, ,11 1,iI ji jij 1 ,1 t {t•,all= �l llSli!1ij!�!�!t a'i;'11 it 111111111 i[lI if. I�l PI it i It II 11l 11,It Kali I LL = egg O I ,II $d A S€� t Y CMYO AMM t 1-- YY� QYa =—� liz-- -I S- wi #•>i Ytl fig $121 ZSYIt elig I'll �29 y � � fig wcuz' ♦_se. m s otm s.w s OZ tt e .� •a W • 1 kkf I Y I _ x tl I S • _— �YC ijYb� `Y+� tlYit 48 It i i $ •13 s.7M71L"I '.i.l mY•1'ai:.•c= ----'1\Y II1GlC0:.V� -�-e _._ _. �_ .3_-__ _- KH-iNY,011laf0 wor �f �S� ••�Y _ 7 � Ii " 4%"S to11�;C C Ordinance No. 480-144 $� _i"6 Page 9 P. O., Box 92783 Sduthlake , Texas 76092 ,,. September 13 , 1994 Mayor Gary Fickes Members of the City Council 667 N. Carroll Ave . Southlake , Texas 76092 Dear Sirs: Although I respectfully and strongly urge you to support the Coventry development proposed by David McMahan and Pima Properties , Inc. , I am writing with as much or more concern about the recent conduct of some of our citizens in the Spin it and Spin 12 groups . There are several areas which concern me greatlyl ( 1) . Verbal abuse to Mr. McMahan, the P & Z members , and Members of the City Council (2) . Public questioned integrity and disrespect of Mr. McMahan, one of our own residents and a highly respected businessman . (3) hies to gain names on petitions (I have proof) (4) . A deliberate attempt to block the Coventry Develop- ment for personal gain on the part of one of the Members of these Spin groups. It is my opinion that the Spin groups , which were organized, I understand, on a trial basis , are not operating for the purpose that was intended. Rather they seem to be intent on taking control, and, as was well said by Jon Michael Franks , creating a state of anarchy. Let me say very strongly here that if the council does not act quickly to limit the actions and power of these groups , you will soon have no need of a mayor, a P & Z or a city council. Chaos will prevail at all of your future meetings . Someone could even get physically hurt which would be a tragedy. You could do this as easily as you organized them: (1) . Dissolve the Spin groups altogether , or (2 Limit their scope of power , and insist that guidelines be followed W - post rules of conduct for all members : in chambers , in city offices (I understand your city staff has also been abused verbally) , in foyer , outside the city hall , and by letter. (4) . Enforce rules of conduct by having police posted at all meetings , with clear instructions to clear the hall if necessary. (5) . Limit speakers to the spokesperson for each group (6) . If any cursing or obscenities are used have the offender personallyescorted from the hall by the Police �B`1 You have an obligation to the rest of your citizens to do this; for our protection, the protection of men such as Mr. McMahan in the future , and yourselves. You deserve the re- spect due yourself and your position. In regard to the Coventry development , we believe it will be one in which the City of Southlake can be proud. It-•will provide hpusing that is going to be much more in demand, it will provide the "rural" look which seems to be one of the concerns , it will provide a major part of the sewer at the expense of the developer which the city is obligated to provide for the north part of Southlake , and it will greatly reduce the water drainage problems which seem to plague some of our neighbors . Not the least is that much needed revenue will be added to the city and the school budgets , I'm going to guess from one-half to a million dollars a year. You owe it to the overall welfare of the city to vote for the Coventry development . As long-time residents of Southlake and major property owners, I and the Bradley family will not stand still and be silent any longer in the face of the groundless oppositions which have been prevailing at all of the P & Z and council meetings. Thank you for giving attention to these matters. I felt the need to express them, not only as one of the property owners involved in this development , but as one who has always loved and been proud of the City of Southlake and who still has the welfare of the City and School at heart . Sincerely yours n/i Beverly Bradley 9/15/94 The Mayor and Council Members C ty of Southlake 667 N Carroll Ave. Southlake, Tex. 76092 Dear Sirs: 2 wish to go on record in support of the requested Zoning of the Taylor/Bradley property for medium density housing, (ZA 94-88) , for the following reasons. Our plan to sewer the city as initially proposed by Joe Wright has been to let the developers provide the main trunk lines. This is working very well for the city and the taxpayers. The two properties developed together provide the only tract large enough to.. financially support such a trunk line for the North West quadrant of the city and medium density zoning is necessary to make such a project financially feasible for a developer. Should medium density not be approved then all the citizens of the city will be paying to sewer this section of the city in the future. Respectfully o d Knight 17 9 E Highland Southlake, Tex. 76092 J f 1200 Shady Oaks Southlake, Texas 76092 Honorable Gary Fickes Mayor of Southlake 667 n. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Sir; fe ish to write to you to bring to your attention the upcoming aring on the Zoning Change for my property. I feel that there has been a lot of misrepresentation and misstatement of fact regarding Mr McMahans development plans for my property. Mr. McMahans development plans do not include the development of one-third or less lots and they do not include row houses Mr. McMahan does include one acre lots adjacent to other one acre plots. In addition, he has included the installation of sanitary sewers and the street drainage so that it does not drain on to adja%ent property. MrW*Mahan has years of experience in developing residential property and I feel that he has done a good job with my property. I have had two contracts that were intended for one acre developments or where one acre developements were considered and in both cases the developers have told me that there is not a market for one acre lots. I know of several dev lopments where one acre lots did not sell and which caused fiYcial losses to the developer. If my property was developed in one acre lots, I believe that it would depress the value of adjacent property because of the c A R f6 lack of demand and the surplus of lots. I feel that Mr. Xchavt M =/� development would be valuable to the neighborhood and to the City of Southlake, since it does not include septic systems for each lot. I have lived on the property since the 1950's and I have seen the tract sizes reduced from 30-40 acres to less than one acre today. I need to sell my property and I feel that Mr. McMahan will develope it into an asset for the City of Southlake and its citizens. Very truly yours, Helen Taylor i� cc: City Council of Southlake I am (in favor of) opposed t (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: o �c lam© VA�, M'11®u 1" 4, SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) All. ADDRESS: S K REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94; �6S I am (in favor of) Lo-ppos�to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: see attached notes VP A RESS: Glen and Alice HUrgess 1253 N .—2e tnnvi l l e Axe Spike mil- ( 0 • • M CD CD O tj H p O ',� c+ O ::Z: Cr O Fd00 N A M ::F, 0 'd a' F 7 F J pt;r O M C+ W 0 M CD O '5 P; �V M H) M 0 : N•o rn M o ice• H m o �V p) FJ 4 6' H CD P, cD VD 0 P 0 at tv C+ 0 0 Ca H FJ 0) C_,. M N t2 tc (D Fd CD o F' a m 'Y m CD c+ '� 4; �Y o c+ Fes• F� � F-� OC H CD tj W • tC•. F-j0 Fj 0 c+ 0 H- H- W �3' Z :' m p) 0 N N•o aH mFd Pi O X, $:� 110 O �j H N• 0 P-oSDJ N- s �Y'd Fl- 9) 4 FJ CD c+H r- H H c+- m M Fd H t<i, • "d m 1-d o N tJ P- p) M Fj (D m o ::S Co H a' H o Fri m a r. N M N• F-J'd �:S 'd c+ CD o G''q c+ m " � m m N•CD P cF d o W t� c-4 (D Fj H CAW Fj P) H tYm is �3' 0 m NP N PJ a' NH M H O H c+- MM HOOF-' Fes- CD CD p) HHP Fl- �JPi c :JFJP, p) H {' 0 0 �d cF o F+.) ::I 1-1 � -.4 P, rb CD CD m 0 c+- c+P. k o in m tT CD 0 m Fj_ � O O m M P Pi CD a' 0 • m CD c+ P- ,`3 M `-3 O c+ H o Fy n O W E Pj 0 M cF P. c+ m m p o c-F tj P H Fi a FJ F-'• �Y W tj H c+ 0) V F-1 u. r, M P co m m o O Fl- M 0 a' 0 P) cF c+ W 4 M o N• � "f7L FJ H 0 0 0 • c+ m H � F-J 0 �' p) � � cF'4 �' 4 CD 4 cy � Fj- 0 O CD I'D CD O CD H ci-cF- H O P M F-'•M •• CD CD CD CD Otj c+ t:5 FJ ::� -{- I f\? H m r- H- �y a' -4 �J M M M c+ :j N Pi tY Fj m F M H 1-j• 0 M 0 o m07,1 �yH :3, 0�(IQ t-io o - 0 O Fl- Fj CD CD ::J c+ p) Fd 0 8 H o p) M N• N• P P Fd " 0 O ::� c+ � CD •a0 m 0 N• c+m H Oc-4 a �:S H F • CDM ,• 0 M FA O H N-4 cFc+ mo N•C4mm aI:; �• t ::s M0HHC+ mch :j m �5 O cF O N CD P, ::s m pW ::!r ci- ty 01Q m P cF• O �J o m O F-h H i C!)O H m FtFl- N � �V z �s 0q 0 : CD CD 0 0 :y N• m F-h Co 1,1 Fd H a' CD 4 H O o -4 M 0 cF CD n 0 p) ci-x CD P,CD p- CD CD Pj F-' r� 0 N• M Z - c-4 M c+ c+ H N• H CD cD 0 Fd F-mg W P_ 00 Fl- I'd oW F-J HFJPiHiD :� 0p) tyFJ• WM MH NPC+ co 4 cr.- 0 H H p• m N M F-J N• F-J O H, �Y p 0 Id _l 4 0 O w CD ohm MM00MFjP. :jp) ::Ii- j,, WcFtjH ci- cD �s �:sm i d 0 M F0i • c+ n c+ CD .`S CD Pt ' P. H N-F-'O P- Co m i-• 01q P,CD i-y 0 O`4 03 0 ci- N• •• O CD F-J Fl- CD CD F- W CD F-' o' •- • 0 - c+- O `,..5 FJ r- O F-' ► : H E3 Pi W m ::j cD H __ c+ H W ::1 rYM N0 FJ ..J CD a' O CD c+-O r o ,3' c+ O CD O 04 U) H t� m C-] CD �:5 1-d M 0 ::S' H m c+ H ty A� m F-'• H P, P. P• O H :: c+ CD CD N• F p) H O J ` cF Wf-- m C� �J 0 0' C- Ft p c+- O H M G 0 000 ::5� m ::1 �jxp) HH CD FJW F m C+ CD CO N P. P, M 4, � t%r? 0 Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092-v~ w.,. 1A1 ,,..a6 u«u '.Uliing REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to (undecided about; the request for the following reasons: Al Sc, SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) WEAl 80L i O ADDRESS: ap Cr REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 �Ia�m (in favor of) opposed ) �(undec�idedbout) �thequest for the following re ons: 9 /•�; -L SIGNATURE: cF", (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: emu kU ( REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: CL� (Please Print Name) �.� ADDRESS: C2 14 G S C &vAa w.iu6 —AAAL a &"y vim. IIAA+ VUL CLLLU 111Ql11.11 LV U1G %_ILY Vl JVULl a&- f laI 11LLb' dllU Z_"L111Lg Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94.88 I am (in favor of) Cbpp�osedto) �(undecied about) the request for the following reasons: ©GcJ Eit�3 " SS SIGNATURE: (Please Print Nam ) f ADDRESS: D� The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_gg I am (in favor o (opposed to (undecided bout) the request for the following reasons: ` a d < w SIGNATURE- (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: r ' --- "VULLUd&C, i exas /6U92. .•. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94-88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: w /ve r , Q SIGNATURE: (Please Print N ` ADDRESS: S V�`v REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94-gg I am (in favor of) used to , (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: i ne following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zonin Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. g REFERENCE NO.: ZA 4- I am (in favor of) (opposed to) undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: Please Print Name) ADDRESS: ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlak Commission, 667 North Carr-oil Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. a Planning and Zoning REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_gg I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) /�. L � L'S 14 ADDRESS: I�jl C- 3rc(� ..._.._...00.V&', uv i ivortn l;arroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. 5 r;�' 121994 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 I am (in favor o (opposed (undecided about) the reques< for the following rea ns: 'fir✓ � SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: -- - - - - -- - - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning nin \ Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. /'1g REFERENCE NO.: Znt� n� A 94-88 'J`P 1 ,f f ] I am (in favor of) 1994 posed to (undecided about) the reque t for the following reasons ..�. t` SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: •'lam �x:�'nS� (7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. i 71F'7'' �1'i ni� REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 N 94 I am m favor o osed to(i ( pC . ) (undoeci ed bout) the re uest fort a folio e i-e5e tl I, / 2 Q C h . . Y u evF o T i7ere, e S! d s c -"r crease SIGNATURE: Dent Name) a/- / Ray 98 d and Karol Welsh O Southlake Texas 760gZ � I /„/►" �� U REFERENCE NO.: ZA 949488 I am in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: 94 SIGNATURE: U (Please Print Name) . ADDRESS: J. Clow � fl) 820 N. Shady Oak Dr. Southlake, TX 76092 ZA 94-&g -- - - - - - - ---- --- -- - --- -- - - - - - - -- �.a.. avaav.�iiab iv.all al•.Q�' bC. 1111C.d V—Ut Q11d Wail to die C lty of Southlake Punning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 9494-88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to (undecided about) the request for the followin reasons: ez �- - SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) L- I 4 ADDRESS: j U B. Ramsey (j�✓� A 1` 1650 N. Shady Oak Dr. � V Southlake, TX 76092 ZA94- - - -- -- ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - ---- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 9494-88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the followin 0 S' eU C2T slei 'Z" se T z T SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) 2 "' ADDRESS: SWf0Lrna6aie 7�os� jP. Smith sO K 0 TX 7 609! .), V U i ZA 94-�,' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tlie following form may be fiiied out and maiied to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_88 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: -, �C� C t-OTS (—Ij SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: L. Bolton 1200 Cypress creek Ct. !/ Southlake, TX 76092 >2i F`'�� `. .. .. .. . _,�"'h'if?'�`.`�.' kl��e�cµt,Mw"�tf•`s, ._... .. . •�.+'�.,.::, '`'�s�i�'t<i'+-{ii�{ya:�';,•�1�,,`R'#' �•�,`J7.� I?- q4 ( v — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO. : ZA 94-88 I am (in favor of) OPPOSED 7TO� (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: ----- -- 1) Due to the increased amount of concrete, streets, houses, etc. will definitely create even a larger drainage problem than we have now resulting in the value of my property being decreased. 2) The narrow two-lane roads were not designed to handle the heavy traffic that we now have and is certainly not sufficient for any additional traffic load. 3) According to our school board trustees, our schools cannot handle the students we now have, therefore, we are certainly not ready for additional ones at this time. 4) History has proved that a city of a large population only brings in more crime which causes larger bureaucracies to be built resulting in higher taxes. 9 - SIGNATURE• Don J. Weeks ADDRESS: 1325 N. Peytonville Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning wuunission, 667 Norio Carroii Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. / REFERENCE NO.: ZA 88 4- l 9 I am (in favor of)=(oppose�to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: (Please see attached) , ' u 1994 SIGNATURE • (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: D. Weeks 1325 N. Peytonville Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 ZA 94-J� fJ�� Glen & Alice Burgess August 14, 1994 1253 N. Peytonville Ave. / �1{ Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 488-7270 CA Attention: Curtis Hawk 619-94 Subject: (ZA 94-88) Coventry development The plan for the Coventry development appears feasible on paper, but the placement of small acreage lots between much larger lots is a regression from the current trend of development ' on North Peytonville avenue. The current residents on north peytonville establish their residency here due to the acreage. The most recent residence to establish residency on north peytonville are horse lovers and chose this area due to the feasibility of keeping horses on their property. In essence the residence on North Peytonville avenue moved here to be in the country not for the city to move to them. The repercussion of the proposed development will be felt for years to come. Direct repercussions include: • 124 lots will add from 248 to 372 more motor vehicles. •The current school system will be budded by explosive growth •Water run off will be inevitable with 23+ acres of concrete and asphalt Each elected officials for the City of Southlake ran on the promise to keep Southlake rural and headed in a progressive not regressive future. The current development proposal will require inevitably the building of a new school and higher taxes. A legal precedence may be required to clear up any questions of the cities liable regarding the current Texas laws with respect to water run off if it created the opportunity for an individual or individuals to redirect water via a zoning change. Alice Burgess -r Glen B. Burgess -31 i �w The following foam maa be _f,_llPd. out an!+1 mailer to the C f C�,� i, - •.:h j o . L wke a o larr.m amr, Cpmmission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NCA--"ZA 94_88 I am (in favor of) opposed to (undecided about) the request for the follo e sas: TMEEle - t� SIGNATURE: ' (Please Print ame) v SA.S ADDRESS: 00 v F. Casas 1201 Plantation Dr. n1 ) J Southlake, Tx 76092 l - a -'a k , } Fernando A. Casas 160S HU Free.aN. Dallas.Texas 75234 AUG z 51994 Curtis Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake City Hall Southlake, Texas August 12, 1994 RE: Coventry PUD Request by PIMA Properties Dear Sir: My property is at 1201 Plantation Drive, adjacent to the proposed development. I have just reviewed the description of Coventry prepared by Mr. D. C. McMahon. While I appreciate the changes that were made, I do not feel that this proposal is substantially different from the one submitted and rejected by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 9, 1994. 1 am 100% against it and will vigorously oppose it at the August 18th Planning and Zoning hearing, and at any other time it is brought up for consideration. As my elected representative, I request that you reflect these wishes if you have the opportunity to do so. Thank you, �i3-3� Fernando A. Casas �' I 1605 HU Fr,--aN, Dallas,Toxa. 752:3 t Curtis Hawk, City Manager `') City of Southlake c, _ City Ha!! �: v Southlake, Texas ,�VU August 12, 1994 RE: Coventry PUD Request by PIMA Properties Dear Sir: My property is at 1201 Plantation Drive, adjacent to the proposed development. I have just reviewed the description of Coventry prepared by Mr. D. C. McMahon. While I appreciate the changes that were made, I do not feel that this proposal is substantially different from the one submitted and rejected by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 9, 1994. 1 am 100% against it and will vigorously oppose it at the August 18th Planning and Zoning hearing, and at any other time it is brought up for consideration. As my elected representative, I request that you reflect these wishes if you have the opportunity to do so. Thank you, Q�M From: K.L. Sumner 1205 N. Peytonville Southlake, TX 76092 To: Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Ave Southlake, TX 76092 Date: 15 August 1994 Reference: ZA 94-88 Rezoning and Development Plan As a property owner whose land borders this 103. 76 acre track, your Rezoning and Development Plan number ZA 94-88, I oppose the request for the requested zoning of "R-P.U. D. " for the following reasons. 1 . The area plan calls for minimum of "SF-1 " 2. Houses are too small to provide an adequate tag: base for the schools: 3. The increase in traffic near the area of the new school may prove to be a danger to the school children. 4. The type of development planned will decrease the property value of all existing homeowners in the vicinity of the project. 5. The City of Southlake has nothing to gain from the proposed change to "R-P.U. D. . 6. The earth berm proposed as a buffer will detract from the areas natural look. Generally earth berms of this type are used to protect persons in the vicinity of the berm from something not very nice on the other side of the berm. Makes one wonder just what it is we are being protected from? 7. I am not aware of any plans of Pima Property to relocate the abundant wild life that now inhabits the site as required by state law. Page 1 of 2 In summation. The current owners of the property and Pima Properties should be able to realize an substantial profit from sale and development of the property if it were rezoned to "SF-1 " in accordance with the area plan. The proposed "R-P.U. D rezoning only benefits Pima and the property' s current owners. Homeowners in the vicinity of the project will face devaluation of their properties. This current proposal by PIMA is as unacceptable as was their prior one. The only reason for the "R-P. U. D. " request is the additional profit for PIMA at our expense. The ignoring of the area plan and a reasonable profit connotes GREED and AVARICE on the part of PIMA. The City of Southlake and the , Planning and Zoning Commission should send the carpetbaggers pacE,i g. K.L. Sumner I Page 2 of 2 (V` AUG 2 3 imh L August 22, 1994 CITY SECRETA RY Everett and Mary Allen C-C-•SLG 1201 Cypress Creek Circle V-9G CE.I-t Southlake, Texas 76092 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 96092 RE: 7A 94-88 (Coventry) Dear Mayor Fic1les and Council Members: We wish to express our concern for the rezoning in our area. PIMA would like to build high density homes and call the development Coventry. WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR. We live within the 200' of the proposed development and have never received any notice of rezoning. If you do approve the rezoning please cuasider one acre lots. In this area the homes are all one acre or more. We want the LOW DENSITY to stay and not become like Meyers Meadows etc. Don't forget the Drainage, Landscape Ordinance plus the Tree preservation. The drainage problem in my area-- when it rains heavy I have a RIVER running through the property. The run off is comming from Peytonville. Mr. Hawks and Mr. Harper have both looked into the problem in Cedar Creek. (Post- Oak and Cypress Creek) Hopefully they will find a solution soon before the raining season begins again. Sincerely, Everett tnd Mar en Spin # 12 9V _- 76 DI 1 � YXA e 11i � Glen Alice, and Norman Burgess ��»- U L' August 3 IL 1, 1994 1253 N. Peytonville Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 488-7270 Attention: City Council Members Subject: (ZA 24=0 Coventry development The plan for the Coventry development appears feasible on paper, but the placement of small acreage lots between much larger lots is a regression from the current trend of development on North Peytonville avenue. The current residents on North Peytonville established their residency here due to the acreage. The most recent residents to establish residency on North Peytonville are horse lovers and chose this area due to the feasibility of keeping horses on their property. In essence the residents on North Peytonville avenue movtd here to be in the country not for the city to move to them. The repercussion of the proposed development will be felt for years to come. Direct repercussions include: • 124 lots will add from 248 to 372 motor vehicles. •The current school system will be burdened by explosive growth. •Water run off will be inevitable with 18+ acres of concrete and asphalt. Each elected official for the City of Southlake ran on the promise to keep Southlake rural and headed in a progressive not regressive future. The current development proposal will require inevitably the building of a new school and higher taxes. A legal precedence may be required to clear up any questions of the cities liability regarding the current Texas laws with respect to water run off if it created the opportunity for an individual or individuals to redirect water via a zoning change. Since approval of the aforementioned development would be in direct violation of the "Land Use Plan" a legal precedence would not be needed in a situation where the city council transgresses city laws. Glen B. Burges Alice Burgess Norman Burgess ANALYSIS OF LAND COVERED AREA OF LAND COVERED BY HOUSES: W := 50•ft average house width D := 60•ft average house depth �. SlabArea := W•D SlabArea=3000•ft2 average house slab Houses := 124 number of houses Slabtot := SlabArea•Houses Slabtot=372000•ft2 total area from house slabs AREA OF LAND COVERED BY DRIVEWAYS: DriveW := 18-ft average driveway width Drivel- := 25•ft average driveway length DriveArea := DriveW•Drivel- DriveArea=450•ft2 average driveway area Drivetot := Houses•DriveArea total area from driveways Drivetot=55800•ft2 AREA OF LAND COVERED BY ROADS: RoadL := 11820•ft total length of roads in development mile := 5280•ft Roadl- RoadM := ----- mile RoadM = 2.24 miles total length of roads in miles RoadW := 31•ft width of roads RoadArea := RoadL•RoadW RoadArea=366420•ft2 total area from roads in development AREA OF LAND COVERED BY ROADS: TotalArea := Slabtot+Drivetot+RoadArea TotalArea=794220•ft2 total area of land covered Acre := 43560•ft2 Acretot : TotalArea Acre �D Acretot = 18.23 acres total area of land covered in acres J ,r WATER DISPLACED BY ACREAGE COVERED ft3=7.48•gal IN := 0.. 12 L� Gallons TotalArea•IN.ft•-1 L IN 12 gal �! hl-n 0 11094 Plot gallons of water as a function of inches of rain: 6.106 5.106 4.106 Gallons lN3.106 2.106 1 •106 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 IN GallonSIN Table of values used 0 in= 0 gal in plot: 1 in= 495098.17 gal 2 in= 990196.35 gal 3 in= 1.49.106 gal 4 in= 1.98.106 gal 5 in= 2.48.106 gal 6 in= 2.97.106 gal 7 in= 3.47.106 gal 8 in= 3.96.106 gal 9 in= 4.46.106 gal 10 in= 4.96.106 gal 11 in= 5.45.106 gal 12 in= 5.94.106 gal _� CITY SECRETAFJy September 6, 1994 Ms' Karen Gandy P&Z Administrator ^ Re: Property Owner Opposition to ZA-94-8G Rezoniny Reguest Presented to you by way of attachment to this 1stter are documented, via original signatures, in the form of letters, Petitions or City of So:thlake P&Z forms, confirmations from niinnns o; their opposition to the above noted rezoning request . r] ease note that those opposed include property owners who are wiLhi" the 200 foot notification limit . By any calculation methodology (see mapq including the perimeter measurement our counsel suggests is i ported hy Texas case law, there are more than the 20% required a Council "super majority vote'' in order to effect approval the subject request. Please convey this requirement to Council prior to the scheduled hearing on this matter this evening' For your convenience I have cross referenced the support documents for the adjacent property owners. In some cases Lhere is more than one form of signed or stated opposition. Thank you for your continued support' R. J. Maness for SPIN 11 and the community of citizens opposed to ZA-94-88 UB —�y n 3 yh` (/ u FROM : James Glover PHONE NO. 817 48867130 F'b1 June 7, 1994 To-. Planning and Zoning Commissioners From Tames and Wanda Glover 1355 N. Peytonville Avenue Subject: ZA 94-54 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Oak Ridge We would like to take this opportunity to voice our objections to this request for a zoning change. Since our property is adjacent to this proposed development, we are quite concerned. We put chased our property in November, 1993, because we liked the rural atmosphere. 'Xe have gone to considerable expense to remodel the existing property to make it the home we wanted without disrupting the lives of our neighbors who have lived in the area for many, many years. We chose this particular property because of the school district it is located in and because of the amount of land-4.86 acres. We have horses and a concern of ours was that our horses would be in a safe environment--not a lot of traffic--and that we w )uld not have to deal with people who wanted to live in the country--but didn't want to sec hear or smell animals--a contradiction in our mind. You sec, having made several corporate moves over the years in several different states we knew exactly what we were looking for. We wanted several acres for our children and animals to be happy on. We wanted a good school system--which we have learned over the years attracts newcomers and keeps property values up. We have also learned the larger the tract of land a house is placed on the more valuable the property is. As an example, when we lived in Orange, CT, our schools were considered in the top 2% in the country. Houses had to be on a minimum one acre of land. As a result, our property was worth at least 35% more than neighboring towns of Milford, West Haven and New haven. There was not a single house in Orange which sold for less than $200,000, Those at the lower end of the scale were normally at least 60 years old and in need of major renovations. Anothcr neighboring town had the requirement of 2 acres per house--their property values were even higher than those in Orange. On the opposite end, we also have cxperienced what happens when low density development goes into an area. When we lived in California, a parcel of land--which was owned by the county and was supposed to be used as a park--had the typical "California tract houses" built on them. That was thirteen years ago and our former house today is not worth what we paid for it new fifteen years agoll Needless to say, the people who bought our house from us are not very happy about. it. �M James Glover 'HONE NO. 817 4886790 P02 Planning and Zoning Commission June 7, 1994 - Page Two We feel that based on the type of soil in this area that houses should be on a minimum of one acre of land--preferably two acres. When we lived on Garden Ct. (which is also quite near to this proposed subdivision) we noticed several of our neighbors had problems with their septic systems not operating properly. We are concerned that even one acre home sites may not be large enough due to soil conditions. We are concerned about flooding increasing--we already have had flooding over the last several months--we are concerned that our property will be damaged if water runs off from the Oak Ridge Subdivision onto our property. At the current time, the open land absorbs rain--where will it go when houses and concrete are on this land? What about the 100 year flood plain across the street from the proposed Oak Ridge subdivision? What will happen to these properties when all the rain water floods onto them with each and every rain? If run-off from Oak Ridge damages our pastures then we will be forced to hay our horses on a regular basis which is quite expensive. Currently, hay has been selling for $6.00 a bate--so our expen%es would rise considerably. Will the Oak Ridge homeowners buy hay for us? Traffic on Peytonville is already heavy and quite dangerous. Will we loose part of our pasture to the widening of Peytonville? Cars routinely ignore the speed limit of 30 miles pei hour. Pot holes are numerous due to heavy trucks coming from construction sites in Myers Meadows and Southridbe Lakes. On occasion those of us with livestock have to chase a loose animal down the street--luckily our current neighbors chip in and help--but we would hate an animal to bet loose in a low density housing development with small children playing. Anot!,..cr concern we have is where will those children play in Oak Ridge? Will playgrounds or community pools be built? Or will we have a problem with children trying to play with our horses or worse feeding them food without our knowledge? Who will pay our vet bill when a horse gets sick from eating something it's not suppose to have? We guess part of the problem is that we can envision a beautiful community on this parcel of land being proposed as Oak Ridge Subdivision like we lived in before moving to Texas. Black Horse Run was a wonderful community of I to 5 acre homesit.es in North Carolina. They had community facilities--pool, barn, tennis courts, riding arena and trails that went throughout the development. It's a shame no one has thought of a development like this in this area. It is interesting to note that this community was made up of upper level management which had made corporate moves into the area. Stressing that not all people. who make corporate moves want to live in a development like Southridge Lakes. Many want their homes to be a place to relax after a hard day at the office without looking at their next door neighbor. Many do not want to built a barricade of fence around their property for a little privacy--they would much rather look at trees as a buffer--and this property has some beautiful trees--wilt they all be cut down? Where will all the wild life that currently inhabits this area so? A*' - i dme s b i a=e r PHONE NO. 817 4e86790 P03 Planning and Zoning Commission June 7, 1994 - Page Three We find it interesting that we never received notice from the city regarding this zoning change--even though Karen Gandy states that 34 notices were sent out. Since our property backs up to this proposed subdivision, we would have thought we should have been on the mailing list! We were certainly on the list for tax bills! We sure are glad we paid attention to the notices that went up at this location. In conclusion, we feel that the much higher density proposed for this land will greatly roduce the quality of life for which we, and many of our friends and neighbors, have paid sizeable amounts. Significantly more traffic on notoriously poorly maintained roads, increased flooding in an area already plagued by the one hundred year floor plain and poor drainage, additional burden on schools and community facilities all add up to sound reasons fui opposition to this project. We hope that this Commission listens to the neighbors - not the developers - and rejects this proposed zoning change. cerely, es E. Glover Wanda R. Glover i I i i i SPIN Input Form Name: 4�;"- /�' ) /Q,&/ Address:- Phone: Wk4L- Home am concerned or would like to better understand the following issues: P/al VfPef �� 7 , V-yv a /po�iifn on this/these issueiir—, �� '� 77 n J C� our eighborhood Team a more ectIve and co esive uni I think��YAa d CZ 7 lee P �� The best time/day for me to participate in a Neighborhood meeting is (i.e., weekends, weekdays, evenings etc.) Please fold so address is showing and mail or fax to (214) 325-5674. , „�✓r� �/� �� i f - L CTI- 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A eie ronowing form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA - I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) ADDRESS: ------ - ---- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- -- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94-88 I am (in favor of) (2pposed to) ndecided about) the request for the following reasons: ' - o SIGNATURE: (Please Print N e) ADDRESS: / J REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94-88 lam ¢favor of op osed to (undecided about) the request for thefoil reasons: h SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) �d `1r.f ADDRESS: -7 C o 9 Z .aLiiiiuy, anu �onmg ' ulanussion, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092 - REFERENCE NO.: Z I am (in favor o (opposed t (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name ADDRESS: Uonumssion, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 94_gg I am (in favor o (opposed to) ( decided about) the request for the following reasons: ' SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) , ADDRESS: /( b w Ito )J . ct The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 44-88 I am in favor o -( f) (opposed to) undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) I ADDRESS: �� D'P The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA - ,► I am (in favor of) op osed to) undecided about) the request or the followin reasons:p I L SIGNATURE: LnN �(�TOt�I (Please Print Name 01' 6 ADDRESS: (C(JT IiERE) ----------- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 4- I am (in favor ( pposed ) (undecided about) the request for the follo 'ng reasons: ' rrov�d .n SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) n ADDRESS: 0 U A�q PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING The following Citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, oppose the Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties,Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-88) for the following reasons: (1) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of j Southlake requiring low density residential lots of at least one(1)acre. (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not conform to existing surrounding property development m the subject a area. (3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. i PRINTED ' NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE A 2. 3. PrIicc /, 3ov�ti. S,fv�91Y d'/'�d�6 { 4. r;.� e�.w� 5.j��y � /�� ii!7~f`� �C` y J�(eC 1^Cu ` 'J l/Gi v'r' / -G A V 6. 7. /G1ni i++7l/tk/�i err IA�i r±a 1t1 1R>Z P 6�: )Ie & (. - '9. - I dd Li 12. �/� ' 3 13/Cwzd tuR/,lA,/C U., 5S PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page I Li 1&/b� am__ �� ;►,�u 4� PA&L PRINTED SIGNATURE ADD TELEPHONE I NAME MM 6 Ct 5 16. 1!,Y\ 17. 18. Ar 21. 22. 23. l4L%E- ve;- A4. All `X25. IL 26.yI -�'27. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. ............. 35. 36. 37. 38 6z, 69._ PETk ANG APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 2 5 to I PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE I �"`;�� l�"�cr� _ /(��-v/!�. Cc+..r"i�k...J�Y�tJ�t-✓d '�`t°-��.J 7"z 44. 'I 45. 46. I 47. ,I 48. 49. 50. , 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 58. I' 59. 60. 61. _ 62. 63. ------_.. 64. 65. I 66. 67. 68. 69. PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 3 I•S I ;i IcrJ IJ '1 ('!1(�E S PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING The following Citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, oppose the Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties, Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-88) for the following reasons: (1) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of Southlake requiring low density residential lots of at least one(1)acre. + (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not conform to existing surrounding property development in the subject area. (3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE# if�l I �F-L(�•1'1�-l �/� � -'l )�0'7 ��h1,-.,�(�C� 76�-��r��`� - 3. J�e�� Jewo►� �irL, . N,�� 19U6 INAE@ 98� c 1 4. i lSG•ti 1 [ 1a.. � 7. 8. 9. m, �LI✓1 IiVhM l/'Ct��— 1U�} �;y„1,•� =2 IL; ��3 i 11. A4 CC 5 Z30q G' G'z 12. �n��e Goolg.!j Le w, ,e' (,o-sr1 6o3N&A sbv,2, 31-q-aJ 13. L+ 1 PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 1 "� 1 PRINTED NAME ATUI�FADDRESS 1ELEMBEI 14. �L L -L-TCAwc 17. qb2l- '5Z I j -(3 7j 18 -11 i 19. 20. 2 1. 22. 41. 23. J3 v S Pt4A f-t n 24. 25.— _�2.lpf 27. s, 29 r)o ;I A. 31 3 A;,0-7 33. 2103 34.Q—:Q,5 Cli, A-1,Z Cj &L Soo 35.�', '1�1 . I iT )fty )/ 36. 37.� 38. 39- 4j�jy,j,- 40. I�OL65- 7 4 1. LPETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 2 OF> — PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE# 43." %iL O 44. f- 45. c 1W 46. 47. 48. 49. A,1 S) 50� JAOILK /aa Tlj JL2. 51.�&p t ? 114 52. r 53 54. (fuss oVl�l 1. x; tj 1, 57. If All) 59. f I cl 61. -2> r- -6 7 62. Lx 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 3 PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING The fo llowing Citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, oppose the Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties, Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-88) for the following reasons: (1) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of Southlake requiring low density residential lots of at least one (1) acre. (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not conform to existing surrounding property development in the subject area. (3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. PRINTED r9MF. SIGNATURE. ADDRESS TELEPHONE# 1. 06et F NvdN,411 ' P—axw-4- I 'JOZ 1A 2. , M - 3. 1,411fH4eL T Usl-7ac4ti'7E 4. juji O "f s. a s 151-11W-Ef 6,,l 32y eghlk 7. PLr�Ift u q Dk- 8. 3fn 9. z la - 10.E 71. 13. PETITION OPPOSING ARUJCA_TION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page I r l / O 1 iiusl }t L �� 4, D NTH HAM SIGNATURE ----------------- 15. one (. 16. /i, 0� ' 17. 18. t_ 19. �o��v� c lkrs ,c C_,L. �� t4 -=� "OW l� _ r� 2o .��J� � i zo I cL , 22. 2s. i r"I�o Poz� G f �- 26. .l 28.29 /` � _ � .ter - "Y 30. i, `Pp, Ta d v! r 33. L k " 1P/ 36 a� 34. /vl�.v 35.Jve5- 36._ )Urr,A, Y` 37. MC �P 38. c 39. n u srl � n 40.41. PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FO) CHANGE OF ZONING , Page 2 t 100 tt L eA&c L PRINTED ?LAME SIGN_ AnM ADDRESS TELEPHONE# - 43. k b 6 44. LAN V4 E(�T0>7 ,J45. i tS S�- A'46. 47 1 2 48. 49.'EE FAURCIV&00%. QX,l1l t(1 s- 50.T A W- CP A-tREN r-jROcX L (`G o v = - 51. 1 - 52. /3 itillr 53.! v. G I7W 's 54. \MQ�, C c,n u�,,J f]cx� Ste„ t Ou.-S 3a9 y 1 55. T I - S�� S�c�Utr �f2u 3oj U2ct 3cL 59. by Innvs A ) 1YWq,(anYL(.j4oj,(c4 16.�q i)loq b'4',(L �l�U .5/9 60. HUGH ,( . HOL ICk 'J�"l« t � y /l'l�c(k� y;,�cd '1 kd 51 C/6 61. s sz 62. 10676 e7g Mc C 4� SZ S �A V Lo 4i /1. 6 . 64. IA 66. LLA 68. --a Y� s-yzra 69. PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 3 f t 1�i,o►J 1j 2 P/IGt3 PRINTED NAME MNAIURE ADDRESS TBLEMBEI 71.LAVk, 74. 73. L 76- ?�s 0 k& 'jljj� 77. C)p 70 rJ Ci 6 6 0-5 78 A d S 79. 80 81. Iq 8 83.kAP-,Dkl. 4-12A-Lq go 84. 0 0 j 85. 5-o 0 rya mac,, VV - 15-9(l 41111t) c1l. -/2 t 3-7&& 87. U- 88.-. V 7�- 89. r4 4 IZ9 90. / '/ 91. 92. E.9,R-A Lo oAgk. 93. I� tIS-cci(cl Dyg ,my �16 94A �7 -�LAV,68-1- Mda ka,416-o, J-4-11SCa, 95.TohNE- ap-6cL-L /J(jl pi-OLP*bij- 32 1-6 3 96. 1 A-7-75-27 Aa- 97. 98, IM AV,40.e.., -c'D ''d PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 4 "6"f L'r —5l PRINTED NAME SIGNATU ADDRESS TELEPHONE# 00 100.TAra 10 1.1"lflzo G -fl�l ��"��= f�lo ,G4�;Fv 6�7- 102. L.n/d� S��, Ul��-cat/�`' y /c vs' /�Cc✓t✓!��,,JP S'�i- .ypf y 103. t e r✓u 104. ;K�nnl Et_c iS .�0� !ool ,eAv6,jg"b C7 -iLE1-787-3 1 /J 106. 05 ,A,..„ &„d c% d- 4 s- 107. e'I Roy �avc 31v57 109. . G C I Q0 Rqueoniadu o a -% L� 110. l 0'- paveneldU 'I ge-1<60 /�/f -7 %'d/ -/fir s i c•.6ty�e-��. �� i r r 114. �.j►c�iRFG S LostS4, n I gk kl. pr y rlN v,cG' 115. �flni � C�.SiXJ_rnFe ate- Z6-��V 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING, Page 5 PETti iLj 6e- S PETION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING TI The following Citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, oppose the Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties, Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-88) for the following reasons: (l) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of Southlake requiring low density residential lots of at least one (1) acre. � (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not conform to existing surrounding property development in the subject area. 3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. PRIG A �� .FpHONE__# NAM. SIrNATURE seaGUcylev- y &ilv 401-5'qf v r y$g- SIX, '0arrje Weeke cz� //90 4(i 4A !T. � `1 I dd o A3irt*u Hr $ /Aob t + yy r if wrt4j&' ti3 i Qr;tfa Ct" 519ao' C, M, K-V #m� &/ • C 1 lMO rr /V Ile DA , � P.04 --1994 00 P.05 r i PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING The folio i�ag x Citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, oppose the 7 Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties, Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-$$) for the following reasons: (1) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of Southlake requiring low density residential Iots of at least one (1) acre. (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not .conform to existing surrounding property development in the subject area. (3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does ' not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways_ PRINTED NAME SIGNA'[jRIP, ADDRESS TELEPHONE , i• 1�7 330v. �R MEOW - - PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING The following Citizens of the City of Southlake, "Texas, oppose the Application for Change of Zoning of Pima Properties, Inc. from Agricultural to a Planned Unit Development to be known as COVENTRY (ZA-94-88) for the following reasons: (1) That the Application for Zoning Change deviates from the current Land Use Plan of the City of Southlake requiring low density residential lots of at least one (1) acre. (2) That the Application for Zoning Change proposes development of the subject property that is inconsistent and does not conform to existing surrounding property development in the subject area. (3) That the proposed Planned Unit Development does not adequately address such issues as drainage, sewer capacity and negative impact on existing and proposed roadways. FlUBI PRINTED SIGNATURH ADDRESS TELEPHONE # NAME Nanc rC 1035 2�rrY'ec, ot 14 ea.,rbl 3Yy _ , 43 PET,T+U1J 4 3 a ' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-89 Specific Use Permit/Resolution No.94-39 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the development of an indoor baseball facility and outdoor fields for instruction and entertainment per Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 #11 on 12.678 acres,being Lots 4 and 5 of Greenlee Business Park, Phase I, and Lot 6, Greenlee Business Park, Phase II, and approximately 1.72 acres out of the J.A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529,being a portion of Tract 6. Variances being requested with this application: The applicant requests that the landscape material required on the south border be placed along the South Kimball Avenue frontage and in the northwest corner. They also request the placement of a 6' wood fence along the northwest area designated as the F-2 bufferyard. Contrary to Note #3 on the concept plan, the applicant indicates verbally their intention to meet the F-2 planting requirements with credits being given for the existing trees within the 25' bufferyard shown. LOCATION: West side of S. Kimball Ave. approximately 475 feet North of East Continental Ave. OWNERS: E.L.F.M. Inc., Chris Lamon and The Keller Bank APPLICANTS: Texas Baseball Center, David L. Thorne and Robert Walton, Agents CURRENT ZONING: 1-1" Light Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: Six written responses received within the 200' notification area: * James F. Lunsford. P.O. Box 1685. Dallas, in favor; applicant and owners have made substantial changes to satisfy adjacent property l 1 City of Southlake,Texas owners. This development will increase the tax base and be a plus to Southlake. * systems Inc. Pool Trust. W.B. Strange III. Counsel, in favor;this is a good use for this area of Southlake. * Arlon C. Washburn. 2060 E. Continental. Applied Therapeutic Sciences, in favor. * Johnny L. &Edna E. Beech. Beech's Overhead Door. Inc.. 1000 S. Kimball Ave., in favor. * Malacha Lemons. 12206 Brisbane.Dallas, opposed; wants the quiet of country living, not the noise, lights and traffic from a ballpark. * Southlake Joint Venture, Billie Farrar.Nat Gibbs. Scott Farrar. 600 W. Park Row. Arlington, opposed; this request will be detrimental to Residential zoned properties. Twenty-two total responses were received from property owners outside the 200' notification area as follows: * Linda Parker. 225 Eastwood Dr., opposed; says there are already plans for athletic fields and this land is already zoned residential. * Dennis Minden 223 Eastwood Dr., opposed;concerns are increased traffic, noise,lights, transient traffic would increase criminal element, and this facility will be located in the middle of residential neighborhoods. *Philip Moore.217 Westwood Dr.,opposed;concerns are noise,lights and this is an incompatible use next to residential. * John G. Taylor. 209 Eastwood Dr., opposed; concerns are that this will become a pay-for-play field bringing with it transient ball players, and he is opposed to the 12 month/year operation. * Phillip and Jeri Norman. 209 Westwood Dr., opposed; commercial zoning next to residential will devalue residential property and make it more difficult to sell. * Johnny and Susan Campbell.218 Westwood Dr.,opposed; concerns are noise, lights and incompatible use next to residential development. * Jerry W. Adcock. 204 Westwood Dr., opposed; not compatible with residential area due to loud noise level and high intensity lighting. * George and Corrine Tuttle. 219 Eastwood Dr., opposed; "Pay-For- Play" ball field is not compatible with surrounding residential neighborhood. * Nolan and Lynette E. Clemens. 219 Westwood Dr., opposed; concerns are lights, noise and traffic will negatively affect the surrounding area, and the possibility that this will become a pay-for- play field bringing with it transient ball players. They are also opposed to the 12 month/year operation. * Michael and Laura Heath. 211 Westwood Dr.,opposed; do not want lights, noise, increased traffic, bugs and garbage next to their neighborhood. City of Southlake,Texas * Dave and Pat Morgan. 210 Westwood Dr., opposed; concerns are lights,noise and traffic will negatively affect the surrounding area, and the possibility that this will become a pay-for-play field bringing with it transient ball players. They are also opposed to the 12 month/year operation and the location. One written response was received from outside the 200' notification area with the following three signatures: * Jay and Mary Forbus. 595 S. Kimball, opposed; * C.S. and Marilyn Johnson. 505 S. Kimball, opposed; * Darrell and Donna Fagile 505 S. Kimball, opposed; Their concerns are: narrow roads leading to the area, increased traffic in residential areas where children are playing,increased noise level at night, and they feel this request is not conducive to adjacent subdivisions. A letter was received from property owners outside the 200' notification area with the following eight signatures: * Donna L. Slechta. 218 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * V.C. Locke. 212 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * Thomas A Tierney. 220 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * La= and Diane Faughn 215 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * Donna Halley, 222 Westwood Dr., opposed. * Robert L. Williams. 227 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * Stacie Hamilton. 216 Eastwood Dr., opposed. * Susan Logan, 221 Eastwood Dr., opposed. Their written concerns are that they want single-family development on the 160 acres contiguous to their neighborhood,they are opposed to the noise, lights and traffic and the negative impact of a facility of this type to the neighborhood, and they are concerned that if this project is not a success for children under 19,the owners will try for pay-to-play softball which will bring transient ball players living in vans or trucks during weekend or holiday tournaments. Three signed petitions were received at the August 18, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting. Petition#1, Eight signatures, opposed. Petition#2, Eighteen signatures, opposed. Petition#3, Eight signatures, opposed. P&Z ACTION: August 18, 1994; Approved (4-2) ZA 94-89 Specific Use Permit subject to the Plan Review Summary dated August 12, 1994 and with the following stipulations; the parking quantity to be determined by Staff according to what they learn about the use; the lights be aimed as per the Lighting Plan; there be no P.A. system; "I-I" noise regulations be abided; no stands; no sale or use of alcohol; the age limit be nineteen or younger; hours of operation are such that no full inning City of Southlake,Texas may begin past 10:00 p.m.;no camping; forgive masonry requirement frontage on Kimball Ave.; and it is P&Z's recommendation not to r waive bufferyard requirements. COUNCIL ACTION: September 6, 1994; Approved (4-2) to table ZA 94-89 Specific Use Permit at Applicant's request to the September 20, 1994 City Council Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the second Plan Review Summary dated September 2, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached third Plan Review Summary dated September 16, 1994. Note that the applicant plans to comply with the masonry requirements in the "I-1" district which provides 80% masonry product or glass on any exterior wall which fronts a public street. Note also the expanded parking area which exceeds (by 3 spaces) the agreed upon number of parking spaces recommended by Staff /lit at the last hearing. KPG/bls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES\94-89SUP.W PD �C- 41 Z•>'v p n ■ mum V NOR • © �� ■�I..f J6 MEN f • GIs, L: l �l 1 �. ■Y r p• 1 0 t 0 'Z�— S K I E W ' M 6 3. L 1 t T 17.3 K t 311 \J I { a ..3 {.•K tw]O 7c 2.t•K 1 tIM 12r1 tati11 iw i x 1 •1. I K i0 I To K to«I t I :K t.tt K I in aw Tw Y. 1 .� iw- ,N.K LA - ^'•A I M ( ' tieu Twawl TO 11e7.1 .771 •K = .xT K GAEE�N =r ----- -- CJ n 0 MESUB rw xa J 1K TO a.I3 e.TOt`ISF 20AI K Z K 3 MCT I tw a. Southlake JV If 11 > t11iG11 Tw. K.xK I-1 Q iw a ELMF Corp. co E` 5�`"S F-20A" Y 00 OLO " � 1 c 5` qo i { N. Lemons 0 SO t�e.c >w•c Two II 11 E � � ADO •Y 3K 3K E I , GR ,62� m I "I-1 " Memo '' I m � :_ � E iw.ct 2 Industrial a c w "•'°" Planning > ca 0° I 111_� III N 1 rffrWMAL M teUl A le.ca .«. .K. tw 1•tc as Tw•K• ..•K •f7 K N�1� 1 M telaa A teK A NKI .H K �i'�.; fwKr 7 .K K .513.c iw N1ei tw Let" .•. fw le.a 111 NK2. .H K .H K .K K .K• Tw Let•• To t•tK To M. TO teK Tw t•K2 ..Sc •H K t3.4 K ..a/ In tel., To Lets To Ism To t{.a2s .H K ..K T"1e4 Tw to As K •.K < .K I ..a.0 To lose tots to t•.t •H• An/ ' A teN .K 1 ,K.0 I.tell ' Iw te.s V fw Nl3 Tw t{s Wu •�K w' ' .K 1 � .K K t.3• Z Tw te'1 In to- N tw t14. u , f�i K TM .c .HK ADJACENT OWNERS 3 K to telll rw>. .K K .K K t2.12 K M tar 1w t•a.2 A tell ..sa •..le ,,K AND ZONING tw fIW 1w 4 IM. at.{1 S City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 94-89 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF REVIEW: 09/02/94 PROJECT NAME: Concept Plan for Specific Use Permit for Outdoor Entertainment Center, being_ 12.678 A., being the proposed Lot 4R, Block 1. Greenlee Business Park Phase 1 OWNERS: APPLICANTS: E.L.F.M._, Inc. Chris Lamon Keller State Bank Texas Baseball Center 1300 Shady Oaks Lane 1103 E. Price,Su.102 P O Box 483 7503 Tillman Hill Road Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Keller, TX. 76244 Keller TX 76248 Colleyville, Texas 76034 PHONE: PHONE: (817) 498-7475 FAX: FAX: CITY STAFF HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/14/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KAREN GANDY AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 743. 1. Provide a note on the plan detailing the proposed construction schedule. During previous discussions, the applicant proposed the following: Phase 1 was to include the teaching facility/office and Field#3 (southwestern field) plus 60 parking spaces. Phase 2 was to include Field#2 (southeastern field) and an additional 40 parking spaces. Phase 3 was to include (W Field #1 (adjacent to the office facility) plus an additional 20 parking spaces. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * The applicant should be aware that based on the size building indicated on this submittal the following interior landscaping shall be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Canopy Accent Ground Trees Trees Shrubs Cover Area req'd = 2,000 s.f.* 3 7 33 200 s.f. * Of this total, 10 s.f. per parking stall is required in the parking areas and 75% of the required plantings must be in the front and along the sides of the building between the building and the interior edge of the required bufferyards. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: E.L.F.M., Inc. Chris Lamon (W Keller State Bank Texas Baseball Center Goodwin and Marshall, 6001 Bridge St., Suite 100, Fort Worth, TX. 76112 CSC - am vm ar a inad 01 0 0. W. > Aw c z 1 � a ~ � e Z4 5 tx (Q�� SCeI J Ills of11111113111111rt w �I.��rrkrt,�earr:raaakrlt p .......... =u:......... s t z -w-9 OMN[i�fU S 0 1 T T g�! I I I I I I I u I I I I I � �a 7 : Ifl XF� Q o: MNk3 .I O g oa Z. w HaJV'W AS mmac� w p _ 49 ph 'fib;"�g � �y.7• A I 1 I q'1N T T J 0 T T O G r�7+ter O E g °' O ; w j 1 I '�•�'� w 9�VL R Ic Mx mine ` R•�tR9 E AUVA ON pr - .�' 3DLi a 9Z689-- --M.00.00.06N4 f4f N�fn�M -¢ qy, b 4 h0Y• . � � � O z Y U (L U , J = Y Z J obi x Z N U Ill l (r - GNII A18340tfd HOISNI 1A F)33N3d NNII WHO 13 9 LL. U. —33N3d OOOM J.d 9Z m w; ui Z' �a L:L Qq ^0 c m , z. p N� _� 315FT. 00 www J _ `,y ft IL tr I�W �` ul °` tU � z ohCD - - — I' \ LL .. LLV)w w OJ 1 3 � .0.001 wtM w dOHS oad WIT N W I Q® I a � aa2 (n (.9 m tL .. 30N3d�Nll NIVFI�l�9 w 0 Q U q � U ON le ® ,& w 3ON33 XN�'1 MY NO S� Nass�Nov z i Co w 83 w � �� WPM : Y w � J `�' a°gQwoma b 4 °o j W LL z r w( W 9 0X LL 11,4'd'`' cn U. JJ coz I 4-30N3d DOOM 13 Sl 4 (3NII A1H3dOHd 3QISN113 9)33N3J>INII NIVHJ lA 9- C _C� SOLUTION NO,94-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDOOR BASEBALL FACILITY AND OUTDOOR FIELDS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ENTERTAINMENT USES ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 4 AND 5 OF GREENLEE BUSINESS PARK, PHASE I, AND LOT 6, GREENLEE BUSINESS PARK, PHASE II, AND APPROXIMATELY 1.72 ACRES OUT OF THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 529,BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 6; AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "A"; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,a Specific Use Permit for instruction and entertainment uses has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as 1-1"Light Industrial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (11) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: SECTION 1 A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the development of an indoor baseball facility and outdoor fields for instruction and entertainment uses on the property legally described as Lots 4 and 5 of Greenlee Business Park, Phase I, and Lot 6, Greenlee Business Park, Phase 11, and approximately 1.72 acres out of the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529,being a portion of Tract 6;as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A", subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. Resolution No. 94-39 Page 2 3. 4. 5. SECTION 2 This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1994. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake,Texas QW PP&M-ORD\94-39.W PD ZM a oar v e a .V% ®r() X 8S zx b nE CCpp�(( H IC • *- Z V S VM N w $ k. • O L m �►��rrkra�el.►r><raatkrk G QQQQ -•FE-....•.....o_ww•wuu2wp a� 4� it `4�tr Aig 1 1 O YI "t Ili . f -- -_�-6w_ - M.OZ 6L68 S \X Ars3 vn y, � �C�I,�Ca zv 1 �o T T g � v3k zar F' inmmun r, Z. od L _ M ll[AiISr!A LILLa ! .1 C �S 10 q <- I reaYld 1 I Ie0'�N m ox* E 49,0 0° it Yt�' Op rr (per aZi a l) • t y K M is atfPt z I� y E Or, k - ,�, 1N70SV3 A. QM aw.fKl y 1 E e .9z,"9_- --M_00.00A6 N 4 7 1 Q, (. Nyx�NkM Resolution No. 94-39 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" Sc -lam City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-96 Rezoning Request/Ordinance No.480-133 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 0.862 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, being Tract 2AIB LOCATION: 500 block of N. Peytonville Ave. on the Southeast side adjacent to SouthRidge Lakes Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: Jode Ann Wilson CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-30" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: One written response received within the 200'notification area: * Elliott Vaughn,401 Valverde Ct.,in favor;the general area is almost 100% single-family residences. P&Z ACTION: September 8, 1994; Approved (6-0) ZA 94-96 Rezoning Request STAFF COMMENTS: This tract and Tracts 2A1 and 2AIA on either side of it were annexed into the City on 12/21/88 in the existing configuration. The surrounding tracts have residential structures and the Applicant plans to build one single-family dwelling on the subject tract. On September 15, 1994, the applicant requested to table a variance to allow a septic system and subsurface drainage field to the next Board of Adjustment meeting on September 29, 1994. During this two-week period, the City Engineer and others will be reviewing the feasibility of this property being served by sanitary sewer located at the end of Donley Ct. in SouthRidge Lakes. KPG/bls GAWPRMEM0\CASES\94-%-Z.WPD �� I I!1 )tl NB s 7 1 10 34 .07 , 12 11 `'• 21 TR.2CiCiA a o TR.2CiC1 .61 AC 1 .41 AC A4W—' SPIN REPRESENTATIVES #13 1.0 RONALD MANESS/ROBIN JONES 35 360 ER 5 7 -� 4 9 36 1 b 76R 6! 120 "SF 1 11 9 75 I GLEN COVE - JI b ' �g� o 3 a W. Timms 74 6 ` W. Howell ;, 73 11 S F-1 a P� " /A G 11 p /1V1 1 " 6E .0 @) 2 21, J��E TR.2A1 72 69 °,R 2 B 1.52 AC 6 Ac J. Sullivan SF-20A'AG J. Dzielawa 66 Qe Q J. Sullivan , 16• 2 , � 61 jO �9 ° 2sz 1 100 G�9P 'JV 222 125 R. Kiely iglu 65 R. Brennan YI^ 58 �y N.N 39R - 40 C. Chapman ��r = 62 N 63 N 64 � 1 J "SF-20A"' 61 33 � 2 ,s o 38R 41 "I C. Moore c� PECOS � F 1 T. Julia 56 28 29 30 a 31 37 21I 27 - 42 55 26 ea 1c4 99 IIc Soo 36 U 43 13 199 fs' 1j y tx9 12 W 54 25 a 13 i2 35 Z 44 99 14 p 9, 53 GREGG 34 24 CT 45 I N 91 52 21tl 1N 33 46 23 15 16 ! � 17 18 32 46 51 22 - oP e- ba ADJACENT OWNERS 19 31 AND ZONING ., e t9 6 NNM •10 a � RIQN -• „ •- 12 ) 30 CT I 1" 3 9 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-133 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS BEIN D MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM SUBJECT ,, � TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and property Y ,! WHEREAS,the hereinafter described ro is currently zoned as under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these (40" changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the GAORDMNQJG4480-133 Page l D 3 facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G10RMZONING\480-133 Page 2 Being � �� acre tract of land situated in the� '� and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from ,y Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court GAORDWNRJGW80-133 Page 3 or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORMONINM480-I33 Page 4 �� APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORMONING4t80-133 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: A tract of land in the A. A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, situated in Tarrant County, Texas, and being that portion of a called 3.25 acre tract described in a deed to J. W. Sullivan, Sr. and wife Valta Lea Sullivan, of record in Volume 3370, Page 647, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, as described in a Deed to Elizabeth Brister of record in Volume 8639, Page 1653, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: CC"-IENCE at a 1/2" iron found at the Southeast corner of the tract described in Volume 3370, Page 647, above referenced, said point being, by deed calls, 303 varas East and 1203 varas South of the Northwest corner of said Freeman Survey, thence West 164.69 feet along the South line of the last reeferenced tract to an iron in same for the Southeast corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; WENCE West 189.44 feet to a 1/2" iron found for the Southwest corner of the herein described tract; TT?FNCE N. 25 degrees 20 minutes 24 seconds W. 179.38 feet to a 1/2" iron found .hoc- the Northwest corner of the herein described tract, said point being in the apparent South R.O.W. line of Peytonville Avenue; VICE N. 65 degrees 03 minutes 49 seconds E. 171.21 feet along said line to a ,12" iron found in same for corner; THENCE S. 25 degrees 20 minutes 24 seconds E. 259.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.862 acres, more or less. SAVE AND EXCEpr that portion of the above described tract described in a deed to Arvida/JIB Partners L.P. II of record in Volume 10474, Page 1916, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron at the Southwest corner of the above referenced tract; THENCE N. 25 degrees 20 minutes 24 seconds W. 0.94 feet along the West line of the above referenced tract to a point in the North line of Block 3 of Southridge Lakes, Phase III, Section One, as shown on a plat of record in Cabinet A, Slide 782, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S. 89 degrees 46 minutes 57 seconds E. (plat bearing rotated to South line of Volume 8639, Page 1653) 189.78 feet along the North line of said Block 3 to a point in same for corner; THENCE S. 25 degrees 20 minutes 24 seconds E. 0.14 feet to a 1/2" iron found at the Southeast corner of the tract described in Volume 8639, Page 1653, aix,ve referenced; THENCE West 189.44 feet along the South line of said tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.002 acres, more or less. GAORDWNINGA80-133 Page 6 LSD- I City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM . September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-102 Rezoning Request/Ordinance No.480-148 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for Lots 1 and 2,J. Childress No. 253 Addition,being 6.002 acres situated in the John Childress Survey,Abstract No. 253,Tract 1H LOCATION: South side of the 90 degree curve on Randol Mill Ave., approximately 1000 feet due North of Randol Mill Estates in the 1500 block of Randol Mill Ave. OWNER/APPLICANT: John R. Smart CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-IA" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: Two written responses received within the 200' notification area: * Lloyd O. Latta, Jr., 1580 Randol Mill Ave., in favor; did offer concern about the "narrowness"of each lot and the extreme depth of each lot. * John S. Sanders, RR 5 Box 201A, in favor. Py&�Z ACTION:., September 8, 1994; Approved(6-0)ZA 94-102 Rezoning Request lu,�- KPG/bls G AWPF\MEMO\CASES\94-102-Z.W PD ■■OMEN■■\��► 1 i 1.011 1" s 1 � *.., ,•i' ''•1 It. ►�.�s�+it!'�L� ��■■ Coll, �MINI M I r u Now Ism Ito I ME =!�� ♦ �®fib Nest �� MEN ��r■:: - . . . ��Ili�r�� j,14 WIN MTV . c'..� 1F 1EAl 1 �-7 - "sP1-A" 1 G 1 B i - - - 3 J. Morgan "AG" "AG" . - . - . - L. Latta M. Ward "SP1-A" i K. Schatz 1 G 1 1 G 5 H "AG J. Charlton 1 F "AG" R. Taylor U) 1 "AG" 1 G 2 > 1 G 3 D. Fanning "AG" J. Sanders I 0 1 G 4 I -17 "AG" I J. Brown I "AG" 2B M. Beam I SPIN REPRESENTATIVES #13 RICK PATTERSON/CAMELLE RASDAL i 2A ADJACENT OWNERS i AND ZONING I _ T - - - : CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-148 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS BEIN AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM � ;<' � �� SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as.1, A nder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these GAORD=KINGw80.148 Page 1 �r� l changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: GAORMZONINQ480.148 Page 2 `> Bem J� �� %and more fully and SIR M. completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affumed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court G:\ORDXZONING\480.148 Page 3 [ - or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORMZONQVG1480.148 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: c:0RDQ0xwcueo.1as Page 5 b E � EXHIBIT "A" THAT WHEREAS, John Smart and wife Malinda Smart, are the owners of a tract of land in the John Childress Survey, Abstract No. 253, situated in Tarrant County, Texas , and being the Tract described in a deed to John Smart and wife Malinda Smart of record in Volume 11641 , Page 2001 , Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas , said Smart tract being a portion of a tract described in a deed to Mrs . D. 0. Fanning of record in Volume 2232, Page 35, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron found in the South R.O.W. line of Randol Mill Road, said point being the Northeast corner of a tract out of said Fanning tract described in a deed to J. B. Brown etux, of record in Volume 3470, Page 23 , Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point being, by deed call , 239. 3 feet varas North, 150.4 varas East, North 929 . 1 feet and N. 880 - 30 , E. 616 . 7 feet from the Southwest corner of said Childress Survey; THENCE N. 880 - 04 , - 34" E. along the South line of Randol Mill Road 213. 86 feet to a. 1/2" iron set for corner; THENCE S. 300 - 37 , - 41" E. 140.70 feet to a 1/2" iron set for corner; NCE S. 10 - 301 E. 820 . 86 feet to a 5/8" iron found at the Southeast corner of the above referenced Smart tract; THENCE S. 890 - 27 , - 141, W. 282 . 39 feet to a 1/21, iron found at the Southeast corner of the tract described in Volume 3470, Page 23, above referenced ; THENCE N. 10 - 30 , W. 937 . 48 feet along the East line of the last referenced tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 6.002 acres . G10RD1ZONINQ480.148 P•ege 6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM t September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-103 Plat Showing REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing of Lots 1 and 2, J. Childress No. 253 Addition,being a 6.002 acre tract of land situated in the John Childress Survey,Abstract No. 253,Tract 111 LOCATION: South side of the 90 degree curve on Randol Mill Ave., approximately 1000 feet due North of Randol Mill Estates in the 1500 block of Randol Mill Ave. OWNER/APPLICANT: John R. Smart CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-IA" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: Three written responses received within the 200' notification area: * Lloyd O. Latta, Jr., 1580 Randol Mill Ave., in favor; did offer concern about the "narrowness" of each lot and the extreme depth of each lot. * John S. Sanders, RR 5 Box 201A, he did not indicate if he was in favor, undecided, or opposed to the request. * Maxine V. Beam, 1325 Randol Mill Ave., Roanoke, in favor. P&Z ACTION: September 8, 1994; Approved (6-0) ZA 94-103 Plat Showing subject to the Plat Review Summary dated September 2, 1994. STAFF COMMENTS: Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated September 2, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the second Plat Review Summary dated September 16, I(,h�� 1994. KPI(G/bls GAWPF\MEMMCASESC94-103-PS.WPD _ ,'. N ti,, .. N �!../�' -••.T Lam MC. F2Ems WIN Is'1©00 � ,,f . IIIIC� �� ► ♦ v NOW ills ALM 17M MAP :.. � ►♦ �®fib ►,`: •- �i�11t� _yam • �: � 1A7T- N11F I I . A "SP1-A" I ..- 1 G 1 B J. Morgan — — — - 3 "AG" 11AG" . _ . _ . L. Latta M. Ward 11 S P1 -A" I K. Schatz 1G1 1G5 H J1AG" 1F "AG" R. Taylor _ "AG" 1 G 3 D. Fanning 1 G 2 AG" J. Sanders 1G4 I "AG" i J. Brown I „AG„ 2 B M. Beam I SPIN REPRESENTATIVES #13 RICK PATTERSON/CAMILLE RASDAL ' I 2A ADJACENT OWNERS ( ' AND ZONING I . � City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case o: ZA 94-103 Review No: Two Date of Review: 09/16/94 Project ame: - OWNER/ LICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: John&Malin Ward Surveying Company 1408 Waterford Court P.O. Box 820253 De Soto,TX 75115 Fort Worth,TX 76182-0253 Phone: Phone: (817) 281-5411 Fax: Fax: (817) 838-7093 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09112/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT TOM ELGIN AT(817)481-5581,EXT.753. * The applicant appears to have met all the requirements of the previous reviews. * Although the interior lot line is not perpendicular,it appears to meet the intent of this requirement. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: John&Malinda Smart Ward Surveying Company Wp-L4 ozz, I --pil a fill Hi i. Ails IS. r Ya/ 0 VRT Nk' ty Z t ozon'! g j . 0 m w 0 lz =oar If MIS 0 V) 4 z 4 X 0 x w NW z o's .0 . 0 lzw ii u Z UD Zj 0 Z 0 0 0 < _j CL City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ZA 94-108 Rezoning Request/Regents Park/Ordinance No.480-150 The Applicant has requested that this item be tabled to the October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting per the attached letter dated September 9, 1994 from K. Wayne Lee, Agent for the Applicant, Regents Park Joint Venture. M- KPG/bls September 9, 1994 City of Southlake ATTN: Karen P. Gandy 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX. 76092 Re : Request to table ZA 94-108 Dear Ms . Gandy: With this letter I request that the above-referenced case pending before the City Council be tabled until October 18, 1994 . This item was scheduled for first reading on t ' r September 20, 1994 meeting. S ncerely, K. e Lee Agent Regents Pa Joint Venture City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM April 8, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-110 Specific Use Permit for Petroleum Operations Attached is a letter from Kent Powers, Regional Terminal Facilities Manager for CITGO requesting that the above-referenced case be withdrawn from consideration by the City Council. This case remains on the agenda due to advertisement as a public hearing. KPG ESN- i SEP 13 '94 01:34PM CITGG TRMLS%PLM 5FL 918 495 4601 P.1 CIMO Petroleum Corporation Qo. Box 3758 Tulsa 4K 74102-3758 September 13, 1994 Mrs. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southtake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Soutiilake, Texas 76092 Dear Mrs, Grandy: Due to a change in plans, CITGG requests that Case ZA94410 be withdrawn from consideration. Your assistance in this matter is appree9ated. Sinmely, X-Ae44,0,- Kent powers Regional Terminal Facilities Manager JKP:jv 8H--2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk,City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-111 Plat Revision REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of Lots 12-R-3-A and 12-R-3-B, Block 4, South Lake Park Addition, being a 2.35 acre tract of land situated in the Reis D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, and being a revision of Lot 12-R-3, Block 4, South Lake Park Addition LOCATION: East side of Ridgecrest Drive approximately one-half mile north of Dove Road OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Richard and Yolanda McPherson CURRENT ZONING: "SF-lA" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: Three written responses received within the 200' notification area: * Jo Ann Fryer Scamardo, 3159 Southlake Park Rd., not opposed as long as R.O.W. for planned thoroughfare is left. * Scott Erikson,2809 Ridgecrest Dr.,opposed;plat fails to provide re- routing of public road which is presently shown on city plans as crossing Coker parcel to the South. The proposed road should be routed over these lots. * Sue Wong, 3007 Ridgecrest Dr., opposed; one acre lots would detract from the horse-keeping ambiance of the neighborhood and traffic on Ridgecrest would increase and pose a threat to the equestrians and others living in the neighborhood. P&Z ACTION: September 8, 1994; Approved(6-0)ZA 94-111 Plat Revision subject to the Plat Review Summary dated September 2, 1994 eliminating item #5 addressing the Thoroughfare Plan. STAFF COMMENTS: Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plan Review Summary dated September 2, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the second Plan Review Summary dated September 16, 1994. KPG/bls GAWPF\MEM0\CASES\94-111 PR.WPD '3T- I J�1 1 11' 1 ■�■ I it{Il�lc.�;l��i�llll� 1 IIII 1111111111111111111111111111111 �' 1111.111111111111111111111111111 It CI111111111111 iii 111111 � iilllll►*�i �111��111111► � • � �� 1111111111111111�' © ©�� 1�( e 20 .� \III � �. �► ' ,. ��Jr ��oc�e I JF SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#3 JOSEPH MAST 21 . 6 Ac 9 . 8 Ac "SF-1 " E. Wong � 1 J. Gilbert AG" J. Scamardo j "AG" J. Coker S. Erickson H. McPherson 1 G "AG" „ 1C1G AG 1C1 1C1H City of Southlake 1 C 1 F R.O.W. "AG" 1C1E1A1 28. 73 Ac ADJACENT OWNERS 1 C1 E1 A AND ZONING .,, 1 C1 E1 't_3 1 G 3 1 �> is _ . .. ..��. . OPEN gel r ICO am No q/ �_... is SIN r 11 II City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 94-111 Review No: Two Date of Review: 09/16/94 Project Name: Plat Revision-Lots 12-R-3-A& 12-R-3-B.Block 4. South_Lake Park Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Richard&Yolanda McPherson Dawson Muller Land Surveying,Inc. 260 East Dove Road 3211 Norton Drive, Suite 102 Southlake,TX 76262 Fort Worth,TX 76118 Phone: (817) 481-7112 Phone: (817) 589-0822 Fax: Fax: (817) 284-2099 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/12/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT TOM ELGIN AT(817)481-5581,EXT.753. 1. The thoroughfare plan conceptually shows a local street (50' R.O.W.) running from Harbor Court in the Harbor Oaks addition west to Ridgecrest Drive and "clipping" the southeast comer of Lot 12-R-3-B. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Richard&Yolanda McPherson Dawson Muller Land Surveying, Inc. BT--� I i .. -� I w• I a.w. I �s�l[aua� w I�� tla � lIOIW1y ,LNG►LlN •W�01, ! I.-.__ aNib ® I Ii�� • & Y L � tl J z• L z 3a ' f L� � G � t o SEK. sj� I! } } }L s t i:t i i �j t } ;]• n kJ o6a ��Qs sib;' } :• i f�iii f €3 rr�i ' iAM >. •1� i! � i �� : �ii )` i i� i t� G e'tif�� i t ��H ��tz�i� �Fit 9 2 ;a ti k i i Jet ;�; jf }+}={F .zi i tFlL y 1 „ i �'f• I I Fait? Iest . ,jt its)t a: ! f§ yt if y [t 5 6 s ems. t a i sor noo•E sn.w• lun !� I� x � i• f;; I I ans s ; /' Il II• i R�n� II I Ie I' t i;l i h!I I ti 1 M City of Southlake,Texas ffln!r MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Appointment to the Board of Adjustments. As you may know, we have another vacancy on the Board of Adjustments, as Karen Reynolds submitted her resignation this week. I will continue to contact prospective applicants. I worded the Resolution for the appointment to replace Karen, however, if Council wishes to move alternate members up, I will adjust the resolution to fit the appointment. I attached applications that I have in the file. Loyd Eubanks, former Councilmember is interested in serving on the Board of Adjustments. Please contact me if you have suggestions. fir►. /sl low s . --- City of Southlake,Texas I RECEIVED 1 . APPLICATION FOR APPOINUIVEENT TO SOUT]HLAKE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS S E P 1 4 1994 CITY SECRETARY 1 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or� i Committee) , BOA2D n I-- A 6Ja5Tm E,jTs „ use a separate application for each appointment desired NAME:— ADDRESS: 505- Z5. K 1 MOA«- A oc . HOME PHONE: (S I7) 4 8 e-7 17 YEARS IN"CITY: EMPLOYER: wpj( 4-r 01)rUSI. �. PHONE: Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: pA.3F Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: To $y- l nI V OL us /IJ :T�1 aacyl Ail., o;�: LT1CriA ICk �On111) J �S ��Q�1 ; Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: Z�S gEAR n S EX f`Fa) tLnJGr,-- Id e.0 O s MUCTj o nJ A IV c\ P) EA/ IT - Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee an that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Additional information or comments? Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. Signature: Date: - -� If additional space is needed, attach to this application arr . H City of Southlake,Texas i RECEIVED APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO J U L p 5 1994 SOUTHLAKE BOARDS AND COM USSIONS CITY SECRETAR APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or Committee) aa"Qa 6M OF A4.fa-yLUllfs use a separlate application for each appointment desired NAME:- ajoad --, /,,, � ADDRESS: �� Vie fly acd Z ', 1 .5J _P h ItA4 I/ e- , ya HOME PHONE: -� �- 9�j 3j/o YEARS IN CITY: 7 Oors EMPLOYER:7he-P/Uden-17Q.I k01-t /�78 71Vi/?gyp ON : 4SI c257.3 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: ,np Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or f committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving. in this position: ,)- R Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Additional information or comments? Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. Signature: �kh& Date: If additional space is eded, attach to this application .rw City of Southlake,Texas RECEIVED APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO 'J u N Q 71994 SODUMAKE BOARDS AND COWUSSIONS CITY SECRETAR APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or Committee) ' tAGc ✓� 1 use a sepwcJte application for e,aph appointment desired NAME: ��►'� C� _ L rf rS ADDRESS: l 2 1 S YZ'1 CCU Y'G > HOME PHONE: Q C/ y YEARS IN CITY: , EMPLOYER: 0 yl e, PHONE: Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: e_ i Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as o the p pose, goal , and duties same: �� > >�L� r (ndbn a 1 C Qualifications and experience that would assist you (�n, r}�ing in ✓� - e_ Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? c— S Additional information or comments? kf' A PV U r1 Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. I Signatur a��(? oDate: 229 LI If additional space is needed, attach to this application v�rr City of Soutniake.Texas APPLYCA RECEIVED Q�1 FOR APPO T4 SO_UTE1A"_Do_Agpsi u N 0 2 1994 1 CITY SECRETARY APPLICATION FOR APPOZN`SMERT To: (Name of Board, Commission, or E Committee) Planning and Zoning commission ' use a separate application for each appointment des red NAXE: Richard F. (Rick)..Dahlson ' ADDRESS: 1406 Wed ewood Court HOME PHONE: 817/424-1066 _ YEARS Ibi'CITY: 2 months EMPLOYER: Jackson &_Walker, L.L.P. _ PE'ONS:2141953-5896 current and/or previous board, commission.. or committee experience in the City of Soutblake: none. Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission,, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: See attached Answer'l Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving iz j this position: See atta he 1��swer'.2 Do you understand and agree that your regul.ax attendance "d active support are requixed as an appointee and that nontompli.ance could result in removal from the board? Yes, and I am reader to make the commitmen Additional, information or comments? _ Please return this completed form to the City y Secretary's Office. k Each applica n will a kept on file for one (1.) year. ! Signatur Date: June 2, 1994 If additional space is needed, attach to this application 9�� Attachment to Application , Answer 1 I had previously lived in East Dallas for seven years and, after an exhaustive fifteen month search, determined that Southlake was the most desirable place to live in the Metroplex. Why Southlake? (1) excellent schools; (2) small town (community) environment; (3) location; and(4)an opportunity to build the infrastructure for a prosperous, well planned city. Southlake, with its raw natural resources and beauty,is in an enviable position to build a city from scratch. Souddake is now facing the challenge of building a city by mixing commercial, residential and agricultural uses. A master plan needs to be developed and, more importantly, implemented. Traffic flow must be considered. The needs and wants of the community must be discussed. Only through active participation by the citizens of Southlake and the well informed and reasoned decisions of the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and, the City Council can the optimum plan be developed and implemented. I believe that the Planning and Zoning Commission must adopt a master development plan and, in so doing, listen, discuss, analyze and decide the zoning and planning needs of Southlake. I would like to be an active part of this. Ana_� My business and legal education and experience has helped develop my skills to listen, 1%W ask questions, reason, rationalize and make decisions. I learn quickly and am decisive. I believe in the development of business (I serve on the Dallas Chamber of Commerce Small Business Executive Council), but also believe in the need to develop the residential sector of Southlalce. I am married and have two young children and intend to live in Southlake for a long, long time. These factors point to the primary reasons why I should be appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission: I am extremely interested in, and capable of, serving and I will be very committed to my responsibilities and duties. 85800 .rr • City of Southlake,Texas i ,RECEIVED: APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO F E B 2 5 1994 SOUTHLAKE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS CITY SECRETARI APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or Committee) l2l %' n c H Z ',2//7c C c :�il7� i 7L�r'C usd a separa application for each appointment desired I NAME: ADDRESS: (� J U T!%/e%✓z' / ✓�, / Syc�T/ /�� e HOME PHONE: (3'j -7) `/`�'�' -/0 3�; YEARS IN CITY: EMPLOYER: l�1�� /�� ;%/�-S-7LL Uf"-s PHONE: (1/y)7/d'— �4/Z,p Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: 1y/y,/.;E Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: T�iJfirf/C /7f'�p 7"'X e /�/ciCPss o7! C`U�77�o/�r E C�- • / ` 10v7—/i /cP I fe p i Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in l this position: fa I Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? yF f Additional information or comments? 74k f 17t4 /it!E f 1-2,, L 1—//11/421�f 7"i e >/ CS C!7�/2- Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. y Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. Signature.' = Date: /�S/c�• If additional space is needed, attach to this application I 9�T City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 94-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has a Zoning Board of Adjustments as stated in the City Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI, Section 11.02; and, WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 44, calls for a five (5) member board with two (2) alternate members; and, WHEREAS, currently a vacancy exist with a term to expire in May, 1995. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council does hereby incorporate said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. Under this Resolution an appointment is hereby made to fill the unexpired term of Karen Reynolds, with a term to expire in May, 1995, Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Gary Fickes ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 4W /W-4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution 94-46, Changing Fee Schedule In September 1993, the City Council approved Ordinance 592, which provides for the adoption of a resolution to establish and revise fees for city services, uses, and activities. Resolution 93-471 also approved in September 1993, established fees for Administrative, Community Development, Public Works, and Park activities. In October 1993, Resolution 93-58 was approved, lowering the late payment fee on delinquent utility bills from JQLo to 5%. Resolution 94-46 is presented for approval. Several changes to the fees are proposed, which are summarized below: I. Administrative Activities. Copy charges are recommended to change from $.55 for the first page plus $.15 for each additional page to $.10 per page. This charge is consistent with General Services Commission recommended rates: H. Community Development Activities. Board of Adjustment requests-increase from $10__0 to $200-per request. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance-proposed at$200, previously not included in the fee schedule. Amended plats with less than or equal to four lots-increase in the base fee from $100 to $200. Amended plats with greater than four lots-increase the base fee from $200 to $300. Plat Showing 1 lot-reduce from $300 to $200 the base fee. Mapping fees are expanded to include charges for color maps and 11" x 17" plat copies. The fee adjustments are proposed to more closely reflect the amount of time spent by Community Development staff in processing the various requests. III. Public Works Actiy#ies. Additional recycling bin charge is removed, since Laidlaw does not charge the City for the additional bins as Lakeside Sanitation had before. Illuminated sign permits (electrical) fees are added at $35 each in addition to the regular sign permit fee. IV. Park Activities. The annual registration fee of$25 is not refundable, therefore the reference to this in the fee schedule is deleted. Ballfield fees with no lights are proposed at $7.50 per 1 and 1/2 hour time slot. This fee will cover field preparation. The ballfield lighting fee is proposed to increase from $10 to $15, with an expanded time of 1 and 1/2 hour. LAH City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 94-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 93-47 AND 93-58; PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTIONS NO. 93-47 AND 93-58; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 592 providing for the adoption of fees and revisions thereto from time to time by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council with Resolutions No. 93-46 and 93-58 set a schedule of fees for certain services; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the current fees for certain services, uses, and activities and has determined that said fees should be revised. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That this resolution shall be cumulative of all provisions of Resolutions No. 93-47 and 93-58 of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this resolution are in direct conflict with provisions of such resolutions, in which event the conflicting provisions of such resolutions are hereby repealed. Section 2. Schedule of Fees: The following schedule of fees shall be established and periodically updated by the City Council : SCHEDULE OF FEES I . Administrative Activities Activity Fee 1 . NSF Check Return Charge $ 20 . 00 ............................... 2 . Copy Charges $ �— �<:3 . Water Service Customer Listing $ 1 . 00/computer page 4 . Water Customer Mailing Labels $ 35 . 00 5. Offense/Accident Report Copies $ 4 . 00 ea. 6 . Burning Permits $ 0 . 00 7 . Ambulance Fees : Transport-Baylor, Grapevine (w/o oxygen) $150 . 00 Transport-Baylor, Grapevine (with oxygen) $160 . 00 Transport-Other Hospitals (w/o oxygen) $300 . 00 Transport-Other Hospitals (with oxygen) $310 . 00 Activity Fee 8 . House Moving Permit $ 10 . 00 + $1, 000 Surety Bond + 1 .5 x hourly rate of 2 police officers utilized in the move 9 . Solicitation/Vendor Permit $ 35 . 00 (Co. license) + $10 . 00 / Agent + $1, 000 Surety Bond 10 . Seasonal Permits $ 25 . 00 11. Vital Statistics : Certificate of Death $ 9 . 00 / 1st copy 3 . 00 each add' 1 copy at time of initial request Certificate of Birth $ 11 . 00 / copy II . Community Development Activities Activity Fee 1. Board of Adjustment requests �/request 3 . Zoning Only $200 . 00 + $10/Acre 4 . Concept Plan Only $200 . 00 + $10/Acre 5 . Zoning & Concept Plan $300 . 00 + $10/Acre 6 . Zoning and SiLte Plan $300 . 00 + $10/Acre 7. Zoning/Concept & Site Plan $500 . 00 + $10/Acre 8 . Specific Use Permit $200 . 00 + $10/Acre 9 . Site Plans $300 . 00 + $10/Acre 10 . Amended Plat s 4 lots $ 33 f 199-00+$20/Lot/Res ....................... $ f30 0. 99+$20/Ac/Comm 11 . Amended Plat > 4 lots $ # ' # 200 . 00 + $20/Lot-Res $2 0/Ac. -Comm ...........:.......... ...................... ...................... 12 . Plat Showing (1 lot) + $20/Lot-Res $ () + $2 0/Ac/Comm 13 . Plat Showing (multiple lots) $300 . 00 + $20/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $20/Ac. -Comm �� J Activitv Fee 14 . Preliminary Plat (Non-P.U.D) $300 . 00 + $20/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $20/Ac . -Comm 15 . Preliminary Plat (P.U.D. ) $300 . 00 + $30/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $30/Ac . -Comm 16 . Final Plat (Non-P.U.D. ) $300 . 00 + $20/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $20/Ac. -Comm 17 . Final Plat (P.U.D. ) $300 . 00 + $30/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $30/Ac . -Comm 18 . Plat Revision $300 . 00 + $20/Lot-Res $300 . 00 + $20/Ac. -Comm 19 . Plat Vacation $200 . 00 Flat Fee 20 . Rush Plat Filing $300 . 00 Flat Fee 21. Two-County Filing $ 50 . 00 Flat Fee 22 . Extra Plat Page Filing $ 20 . 00 Flat Fee 23 . Mapping (1 :1000) - ? ' ..................................................................$.....20 . 00 per....Map. :..:.:::.. 24 . Mapping (1 :2000) - 3........................................................... .......S . OO ...per Map :: :...;•::.r:•;;:;. ..y....:.: :.. •>::.::.::..�.. .:::::�::::,. ..:+g.. ::5:.>. ..,.�y. .,:i...: .a+..c ...;:a.... .. ...e�.�+.k;:a:-;:.;;:.;:.;:.;:;.;:.;:.;:.:t.>:.: :.:.;:.;:.;:: :.:•:.:/•�.. :•:.::•. i1i:•::;:: Sac'', 26 . Street Name Change $100 . 00 per Street 27 . Temporary Batch Plant Permit $ . 00 per Permit 28 . Tree Removal? Permit $ . 00 per Permit 29 . Parkland Dedication- Raw acreage cost $25, 000 . 00 per acre III . Public Works Activities Activity Fee 1 . Administrative Processing Fee 2% Actual Const . Cost 2 . Computer Drainage Study: HEC I : $400 . 00 + $ . 10/Lin.Ft. * HEC II : $400 . 00 + $ . 10/Lin.Ft . 3 . Construction Inspection 30-. Actual Const . Cost 4 . Street Cut Permit $ 15 . 00 per Street Activity Fee 5 . Easement Abandonments $150 . 00 Flat Fee 6 . R.O.W. Abandonments $150 . 00 Flat Fee 7 . Easement/R.O.W. Dedications $100 . 00 per Easement 8 . Water Tap Fee 1" Meter - $ 360 . 00 2" Meter - $ 600 . 00 4" Meter - $ 1, 900 . 00 6" Meter - $ 2, 777 . 00 8" Meter - $ 4, 05A . 00 9 . Sewer Tap Fee $ 75 . 00 10 . Water Administrative Service Charge $ 15 . 00 11. Water Deposits: Residential Accounts $ 50 . 00 Commercial Accounts Reviewed by Utility Billing Coordinator 12 . Fire Plug Meter Deposit (City Meter) $650 . 00 Fire Plug Meter Deposit (Own Meter) $100 . 00 13 . Water Reconnect Fees for Non-Payment, Business Days Only: 8 a.m. -5 p.m. : 1st/2nd/3rd & subsequent $ 20 / $ 40 / $ 60 After 5 p.m. : 1st/2nd/3rd & subsequent $ 40 / $ 60 / $ 80 Weekends, anytime $ 40 / $ 60 / $ 80 14 . Water Meter Re-installation Fee $ 50 . 00 15 . Water Meter Reread Fee $ 5 . 00 16 . Damaged or Broken Lock $ 25 . 00 17 . Late Utility Payment Fee 50-. of Outstanding Bal . 18-mdditienal Reeyeing-ins $r 6 . 09-per Bin 18 . Street Light Costs Developer pays installation + 2-year operation cost 19 . Building Permit Fees Per the currently adopted U.B.0 (Administrative Code) 20 . Water Well Permit $ 30 . 00 9 ' Activity Fee �r 21 . Tent Permit $ 15 . 00 22 . Sign Permit, Permanent Type (1 - 50 sq. ft . ) $ 50 . 00 minimum Sign Permit, Permanent Type (> 50 sq. ft . ) $ 1 . 00 / sq. ft . Sign Permit, Temporary Type $ 25 . 00 :'•� 3"'4i:ti0:4:^:i:•isii:•ii':i•]i:•i'i"4iiY"?:Kitiiii:i:iiiiiii"":'iiiiiiiiii'tii;i4::is!•iiii;•ii":Jii':"'•i:4:ti is?i•:4:i'Fti?:4:4i':C4iiii:•iiiiii}iii}:-iii}iii''iiii':'-i"'iiiii":p...i -•:i:::�:ii�wL:i7�� {v�:iYi• ..::•`:::::i::�k�� %�:�k:>wG•Z'ICFi�^£.•.:•$ +A':}w:lti'..:�:ii}::i�3:3:.i}iii}i}i?i?i}:ii} :i:?:�: i]I':��: .. v.•.vw:nw:.t Y.v:v:-..•. •. •v.:::::..::::::::n�.:::::::::::::::::::::::}•:vw:.w::::,� w::x:nw::::::::::::::v.:�::::: w::::::v::::::::::::. ..:.:.:::.........:..::.::.:.:.. 24 . Culvert and/or Approach Permit $ 30 . 00 25 . Building Contractor' s Registration Fee $ 75 . 00 IV. Park Activities Activity Fee 1 . Non-profit Organizations: Annual Registration Fee $ 25 . 00 (refundable) e) Security Deposit $ 50 . 00 (refundable) Special Events Fee: Lodge in the Park $ 10 . 00/Hr. (3 Hr. Minimum) Community Building $ 15 . 00/Room/Hr. : (3 Hr. Minimum) $ 75 . 00/Hr. (EntireBldg. ) (3 Hr. Minimum) 2 . Other Citizens or Groups : Security Deposit $ 50 . 00 (refundable) Special Events Fee: Lodge in the Park $ 10 . 00/Hr. (3 Hr. Minimum) Community Building $ 15 . 00/Room/Hr. (3 Hr. Minimum) $ 75 . 00/Hr. (EntireBldg. ) (3 Hr. Minimum) 3 . Ballfield Fees : Lighting Fee $ :........... z- Minimum) ) Paid in advance Activity Fee Field Preparation Fees : Weekday Games $ 25 . 00 ...................... ....................... Weekend Games $ 37 . 50>.; e 4 . Organized Athletic Programs $1, 000, 000 . 00 General Liability Insurance Policy 5 . TV/VCR Rental Fee $ 5 . 00/Use 6 . Tennis Racket Rental Fee $ 2 . 50/Hr. /Person Section 2 . Payment of Fees : All fees as established herein shall be paid upon the submittal of the appropriate request to the City. No action shall be taken by the City until such time as the applicable fees are paid in full . Section 3 . Effective Date: The fees established herein shall be effective upon passage of this Resolution and shall take precedence over any fees previously adopted which are in conflict herewith. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas 92-8 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 15, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Variance to Sign Ordinance as Requested by Blockbuster Video Blockbuster Video at Southlake Crossing, Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938)has requested a variance to the sign ordinance. Blockbuster Video has acquired the comer building, which will have exposure to both Davis Blvd. and Southlake Blvd. The applicants request and the staff's recommendation are as follows: Applicant's Request: • north elevation - facing Southlake Blvd. Applicant requests variance to Section 17A "one sign per street and 100 sq. ft. per street frontage." Variance to the height of the letters changed from 24 inches to 30 inches. This would create 61.88 sq. ft. of copy on the awning. They also request a 50 sq. ft. "torn ticket" for a total of 111.80 sq. ft. of signage. Our ordinance allows 100 sq. ft. Applicants reason for the request is because of the distance from Southlake Blvd., which is approximately 560 feet. • west elevation - facing Davis Blvd. Applicant requests 30 inch letters instead of the 24 inch letters in the ordinance. Total sign area would be 61.88 sq. ft. • south elevation - Davis Blvd. Applicant requests a small 33 sq. ft. torn ticket sign on the rear column. They state that many potential customers who are northbound on Davis will be attracted by "the logo." Staff Recommendations: • north elevation - Southlake Blvd. Because of the distance from Southlake Blvd. to the store front, staff is not opposed to the variance request for the larger letters of 30 inch and the additional signage to 112 sq. ft. Council has approved a variance for increased letter size in this same development for the Albertson's store. 4 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Variance to Sign Ordiance September 15, 1994 Page 2. • west elevation - Davis Blvd. Because the distance from Davis Blvd. to the store front sign is 160 ft., staff would not recommend a variance on the heights of the letters from the maximum of 24 inches. The Blockbuster in east Southlake at Park Place has the awning signs with 36 inch letters on one side and 24 inch letters on the other. • south elevation - Davis Blvd. Staff does not recommend that the 33 sq. ft. torn ticket logo be placed on the rear column for the following reasons: a. There are no provisions in the sign ordinance for a third frontage sign. b. The sign will not have a visual impact because of the hill to the south that blocks the view. C. The setting of a precedent for the other stores requesting a rear "frontage" sign. Please place this on the September 20th council agenda for consideration. BW/sm Attachment wpfiles\memos\blockbus.var - ?— } City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 27, 1994 TO: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Paul Ward, Building Official SUBJECT: VARIANCE TO ORDINANCE NO.506 (SIGN ORDINANCE) FOR ATTACHED SIGNAGE AT BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO AT SOUTHLAKE CROSSING. A variance has been requested by Blockbuster to allow: (L) 30" letter height in lieu of the required 24" (2.) 112 sq. ft. on north elevation in lieu of the allowed 100 sq. ft. (3.) an additional 50 sq. ft. sign on the south elevation that does not face a street. Businesses are limited to one attached sign per street frontage. The variance application fee has been paid. Also, please note that the grade elevations and the trees on the landscape plan will probably hide the sign on the rear. Further, the proposed sign ordinance amendments will limit SIGNAGE to the front facade only and prohibits awning signs. Attachments: Application forms Sign Drawings PW:dc �'� 3 City of Southlake,Texas SIGN ORDINANCE F_ REQUEST FOR VARIANCE L RUG L 1994 BUILDING DEPT. CASE NO. : FEE: $100.00 NAME: jwot ADDRESS: W&ST Souris A&C &yD Se, rS y7S PHONE: LOCATION OF APPLICATION: (address/legal description) d,,4c41X, VARIANCE REQUESTED: lfi0�' CU•c��ldri. iS zz DaCr /�.P_ /00 ASK. pw, /e'cssril s/s• S%1ti fe71�� 4e;.f�4 of 30 rt74#" )i tN v1kc ?Y" pC-µriA4 PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO THE REQUESTED VARIANCE: 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. � a►-G cis � her � 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imp osed. cc Ori�'-V& ar 2rdc,,, Q off.. �.-o�- City of Southlake,Texas VARIANCE TO SIGN ORD. CASE NO. PAGE TWO 3. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. GL,- a d' Y ,� Se6k 94 ILf Q11A1r%-,VrJ Wit. 61 aS .tee_ &AtAix w-,%, 1KO, r 4. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. Y � SIGNATURE: p DATE: (W CITY of SOUTHLAKE 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas APPLICATION to REQUEST for VARIANCE ZBA CASE NO. FILING FEE: OOAt) APPLICANT'S NAME: Jack Milner / at,pGKgys VIP-eo TELEPHONE: 817-481-667.9 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2225 West Southlake Blvd. , Ste. #475 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: (See Attached) OWNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT): Developer: John Drews, 5440 Harvest Hill Rd. , Ste. 150, Dallas, TX 75230 ................................................................................................................................. State the SPECIFIC PROVISION of the zoning ordinance for which you are requesting a variance. (You -may give the Section number and paragraph, OR you may DESCRIBE the REGULATION / REQUIREMENT.) .....,....Section 17A - "one sign n per street" & 100 sq. ft. per street frontage ............................... ... ............................................................................... .................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................. . .................................................................................................................................. Describe EXACTLY HOW, and TO WHAT EXTENT your request will DIFFER from the REQUIREMENTS of the ordinance, as described ABOVE. (Use REVERSE, or additional sheets if necessary.) Our request.is..approx:..12 scl.;, ft:..over the limit, of 100.sc�;, f ...on.the front or ......... .... ................ ..... .................. North.elevation,with..61.88,sq:„ft,:. of,copy on. the. of, torn ticket combined. Also.i. the.request,includes„a.33.sq. ft. torn ticket on the rear .................................... .............................. elevation. 10-A - 6 r 3 VARIANCE APPLICATION ZBA CASE NO: Explain why these unique conditions and circumstances make it UNREASONABLE or UNFAIR to apply the STANDARD ordinance requirements to your property: The conditions and circumstances which we feel are unreasonable are the .................................................................................................................................. .orientation of the leases ace a "trade dress" issue, the impulse nature of ..........................R.....J.................... .... the entertainment industry. While some businesses have structural trade dress, .................................................................................................................................. .i.e. Kentuct.7 Fried Chicken or Taco Bell with their bell towers, our trade dress .................. ..................................................................;......................................... .is our torn ticket and awning. which identify us as a Blockbuster. Our business ......................................... ...................... ......................................................... .is unlike man.......................................-- our roduct is exactly the same as our competitors, and many ............................................................ ..peo .lT confuse our video store with another. With the marketing dollars we ....................................................................•.............................Y.......0................ .spend we want le to know the... y ...........are in a Blockbuster. .................. .... ............ ......... .................................... .................0.0....... 46, .........Also unlike other retailers, our business is extremely impulse oriented. .....t.................................................................................1: e.....�....4 ................ Unlike haircuts food mail/shi in cleaners etc. which are necessities the ..........................:.........:...............RP.... :.................................................................0.. ,imaulse aspect of entertainment warrants si na a to attract and induce potential .......... ............... .........................$....$........................................ ........0. .customers, to,act.00 on�their..impulse. ........................................................0.0.............. ..• .................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................0........... .................................................................................................................................. .....................................................................................................................0............ .................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................0............0.0.......... .......... . .......................................................................................................0...........0 .............:...................................................................................................0................ .................................................................................................................................. 10 --/1- 7 (W VARIANCE APPLICATION ZBA CASE NO: In order for your request to be granted, the Board of Adjustment must cast FOUR out of five votes in support of your application. In order for the Board members to vote in support of your application, you must prove several things by your application. Your application must clearly show that your property has UNIQUE CONDITIONS and CIRCUMSTANCES which separate it from other typical properties with the same zoning; and explain how these.unique conditions and circumstances make it UNREASONABLE or UNFAIR to apply the STANDARD ordinance requirements to YOUR property, unlike the way they are applied to all other properties. Describe the CONDITIONS and CIRCUMSTANCES which are UNIQUE to your The conditions and circumstances which are uni ue to our property and situation: ..............................................................................:........... property are the frontage orientations of Davis and Southlake Blvd. to our endcap. .................................................................................................................................. The setback from our north elevation to Southlake Blvd. is.approximately 560 ft. ......................................................................................... ................................. and the Davis setback is,approx. 160 ft; however, we are restricted to 100 sq. ft. ........................................ ....................................................................................... on both the Davis and Southlake Blvd. elevations. The readability of our front signage .................................................................................................................................. is restricted due to the extreme setback and may be further reduced by further .................................................................................................................................. development on the pad sites in front of our store. Typically, Blockbuster would .................................................................................................................................. have a 5 ft. awning with 36" letters in this case. WE are asking for 30" copy on a .................................................................................................................................. 4 ft. awning with a 50 sq. ft. torn ticket which totals 111.88 total sq. ft. , or .............0........0...............• •........................................................••...................0.......... 11.88 over the allowable total. .................................................................................................................................. The orientation of our endcap to Davis Blvd. warrants some signage. While we .................................................................................................................................. do not consider this an entire street frontage, man potential customers who are ........................................................................ .......... :............................................. Northbound on Davis will be attracted by the small 33 sq. ft. torn ticket logo .................................................................................................................................. sign on the rear column. .................................................................................................................................. ,,. .................................................................................................................................. 4 VARIANCE APPLICATION ZBA CASE NO: Additionally, in order for the Board members to vote in support of your application it must be shown that the unique conditions and circumstances which you have described are NOT the result of your own actions. (Actions taken by previous owners and actions_ taken by your agents can be construed as "your actions.") Can you explain how the unique conditions and circumstances affecting your property came td be, AND SHOW that they ARE NOT the result of YOUR OWN ACTIONS: These conditions are clearly not a result of our actions. The developer ........................................................ ..................................................................... ... .., and.architect have configured..the. center in the orientation to best utilize ........ .... ....................... .................................... .,, the,land, includin&.parking..and, traffic flow.and available lease space:..,...,.... ..... ....... .... .................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................. Furthermore, the Board must- be satisfied that the variance you are requesting is the MINIMUM deviation from the terms of the ordinance NECESSARY to OVERCOME the unique conditions and circumstances which you have described. Explain how your proposal is the MINIMUM manner by which the unique conditions and circumstances described can be overcome: This is the minimum because only 12 sq. ft. in front will give us a ............................ ........................................................................................................ torn ticket which allows somewhat better readability and fits proportionately .................................................................................................................................. ...in the parapet/overhang at our entrance. ............................................................................................................................ On the rear elevation the 33 sq. ft. torn ticket is proportional to the ............ ................................................. ..,column and provides readability to Northbound Davis traffic. It is one of .............................................. ............................................................................. the smallest in the Blockbuster,sign, package. ... ....................... .............................................. .. .................................................................................................................................. /D A - g 1 ' 5 VARIANCE APPLICATION ZBA CASE NO: Also, the Board must be convinced that granting such a variance would not constitute an UNFAIR GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE to you, granting privileges that are otherwise denied by the ordinance. In other words, why would granting this variance be ONLY FAIR, and NOT MORE THAN FAIR, to you, since others are prevented from doing what you are requesting: This would be only fair due to the nature of our business, the .................................................................................................................................. orientation of the space, the size of our space, and .the trade dress issue. .................................................................................................................................. .....................................................................................................0...0........................ .................................................................................................................................. .........................................................................................................0........................ .................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................0........................... Finally, the Board must be certain your request is in harmony with the public welfare, and will not in any way be injurious or detrimental to your neighbors and their property rights. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE: 8/15/94 YOUR RIGHTS TO APPEAL THE BOARD'S DECISION. LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, Section 211,011 Any of the following persons may present to a court of record a verified petition stating that the decision of the board of adjustment is illegal in whole or in part and specifying the grounds of the illegality: (1) a person aggrieved by a decision of the board; (2) a taxpayer; or (3) an officer, department, board, or bureau of the municipality. The petition must be presented within ten days after the date the decision is filed in the board's office. 10 : 14- /0 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CIT1( IVIANA low September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Sanitary Sewer System Improvements for N-4 Gravity Spur, Force Main and Lift Station City Council on September 6, 1994 did award this contract to the low bidder, Southern Mechanical of Sunnyvale, Texas for the low bid of $443,554.75. Southern Mechanical has indicated to staff that they could not honor their bid. On September 8, 1994 the contracts were delivered to Southern Mechanical. As per the specifications they have 10 days to sign the contract. As of this date, September 16, 1994, the contracts have not been returned. Prior to the Council meeting on September 20, 1994 Southern Mechanical will be contacted to ascertain their intent, if the contracts are not received in the meantime. City Council has the options of: 1. Rejecting all of the bids and rebidding the project. To do this would endanger the schedule to have a sewer in place for the new Wal-Mart store. 2. Award the bid to the sec low bidder, H & W Uti ' Construction of Flower Mound, Texas in the mount of $504,510.85, and: a. call the bid bo echanical, which is 5% of the bid or a value of $22,177; or b. waive the bid bond of Southern Mechanical because of their "honest mistake" in their bid. Please place this on the September 20th agenda for council consideration. BW/sm Attachments wpfiles\memos\n-4.bid /O�—( City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM 4W September 2, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Sanitary Sewer Improvements for N4 Gravity Spur Force Main and Lift Station GENERAL INFORMATION The N-4 Gravity Spur, force main and lift station will serve an area from north of Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) to the north side of S.H. 114 and from just east of Kimball Ave. to approximately a half mile west of Kimball Ave. (see attached map). This area includes the Wal- Mart site. Easements were negotiated with MESCO for the gravity lines, force main and lift station. In lieu of payment for the easements, the proposed bid includes constructing service lines from the existing building on the MESCO property to the lift station. City Council approved the contract with Cheatham and Associates to design Sanitary Sewer System Improvements for N-4 Gravity Spur, Force Main and Lift Station at the February 15th, 1994 council meeting. Advertisement was published on July 31st and August 7th. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on August 24th. BID TABULATION See attached bid tabulations prepared by Cheatham and Associates. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Originally Greenway Investment Company desired to extend the sewer south of Southlake Blvd. Their engineers designed a sewer line extension and requested an add alternate (Schedule A-1) to be added onto the N-4 Gravity spur Force Main project. The add alternate amount bid for $28,199.05 making the total sewer extension $471,753.80. On Friday morning, September 2, their agent notified City staff that they needed to withdraw from the project. Therefore, the cost of the project will be $443,554.75 as seen on Subtotal (Items 1-44) on the bid tabulation. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the N-4 Gravity Spur project will be provided from Sewer Impact Fees. /DV-aZ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager �r N-4 Gravity Spur September 2, 1994 Page 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council award the bid to low bidder Southern Mechanical for $443,554.75. Please place this item on the Council's September 6th agenda for their consideration. 6 BW Attachments: Bid Tabulation Sheets Maps wpfiIcs\=mos\n-w.bid k CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES August 25, 1994 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works , City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Award of Bids for N4 Wal-Mart Gravity Spur Job No. 001421 Dear Mr. Whitehead: Enclosed herewith is the bid tabulation for the subject project. 'The project was bid.on August 24, 1994. As shown, the low bidder was Southern Mechanical Plumbing, Inc., in the amount of$471,753.80. Therefore, we recommend that the contract be awarded to the low bidder, Southern Mechanical Plumbing, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Texas. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Respectfully, I)—#.--� <:-: Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \southlaMsouthem.awd Enclosure - Bid Tabulation ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696 •Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 /::5 1i&-� 3 V W NNNNNNNN jN - -+ -+ .-. Om ' Q0 OQ O Z O CO OD V Q) A W N O (D O V O CT A W N O (O O V 0 (r A W N ; zz • 3 ? z H Ov D oD 00 00 co co Co q0- q q Co CD qCu 00 q Co 0o Co CD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q tom' C) zo 200000000000000op000 - - - - - _ _ _ (D to _ 0 =jmDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD00000000 D m < � OvvppvpvvpOppcncncncncn � � DDDDDDDD � N ra D zm — x � � � � x7ox � � � � xvvvvvovcnv� �ncncncncncn — O � —I D -i = Ooaoaoaowaoa000a000aoaoaowwwwwww � � � � � � � � En > Yl 1' 7n77 7 .-n l �l "t 77n 77 (ntn V+ cncncna, wwwwwwww -) r" 0 . D --� Ti cn cn � cnfnG7Ncnww (n0wcncn � m a C : E 0 V-* � * � � ——. I - ; cnv) cncnCDcnvDCncncncnU) (ncncn 3 -� a --I : � G) Xvz -� aorno aDrno v � � _v � � DcnG7cnG7cncnG7N p %v hh'q^^ omen ANo , 02ANO � OD (� � U � '0 � � � M � � U � � V m z '� �' _ � � � � 000 � O - - mmmmmmm 'oMvvvv -o -O CO) G� 7C 9 gM - -'_ N? 0000rnAN Do- mmmmmmmm 0 : Cl)N vmm vmm " � " jam — G) 0- y vvvm -0 � vvvvm ODD> ANO O ODmmm -D mmmm •D -° -° Oq � OD Of ANO _- , ii n cn �1xT � � —Ix = � � -D � = OCDgANQQN — � -+ � O p � -I � S- -i -i � -i = mmOoornAN pp � cnOx = x- - -� SSxx 00000 � Qmm z i �' D T -i � -i � � � mmmmm —i � vvvvvm � � —I C („ m m � v v v v = x m m m m m � � _; , tu x z � Mmzz -i -i -i -� � vv � v -� x = d M W z z z n n n 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 x S 2 O Cl) 0 2 x , a O r < rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r- rrrrrrr C z w W �1T1 � �1 'fl �l �'ITTITT 'n-n I7n7n7n71Tr -ninT :1TT '71 �9 'nLn Z � Z =' O W � _ qD tO N -+ OA y 0 (n Cl) N to v can) OD CON � CD (n (A V W V v coVO Z O (4 0) W OOD V N V (3 L"I W Ntntn CA) 0000NCDO (00 V 0) 0) Ac) N O0 0 ( W� WONVNAONO-+ O-+ ()) CD N W a N X"17 Oz"o zCn NA C n WtDA + CDA WOO � VWm0000O000 o 00 0000000 o0 � 000oo0o0cn a0A0V -0aN000nA 00000oo00 ; p i C'n CDW, 69 fA to �q d9 d9 69 69 69 69 EA G9 69 69 69(A (o QJ A CT c0 OD tr W A t0 t0 EA�q f!i 69 -+ CO O N�_ - A EA_ Ui A N P too o 3 9 9DD O ; C N N '"-] tt7 , O COO V N (n to V w CD coo C) cocD N N O N A O w cn Co N o -+ -+ v N OOO CO NOO CD0 V CA A (nAAC t ACD (n tT AOOONA CA P. (n ; -4 N v Z OCD000OD (nOD � p (nN000 (TOOOOONOOONODAODA V -� I w ? ACn O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; oo Z O (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 P 0 P 0 _ 80 v � axrN ? 00 � � � --� NNNN � .... -+ .� Z i .� XOO OO (r V (nA W NN � Oo OCnAW W .NA NQD tip NO VU) OOD VO n .:.( z0 O O O O O O A W W 0 0 0 0 -� 0 0 0 C7 A la O (0 0 0 (O O O m O C OOOOOONCo (D0CD ONNNOOOPNNNO00NOO ; O 7d z '�'3 69 69 4A 69 N N 6 m 69 N 69 69 69 69 69 69 6)GH 69 69 69 69 G9 69 69 N W 69 L^ A d W O696 A69A O -+ N WNW V OD �6)69� A � -+ tD (DOV � WtD n i Mtn LWA P NON WO) OOpCp (n CD CAJa NN NNN (D C) V A V CO NN Oa (DtnNC) W O V (n (nQ) OCD _ W CDr) 00 (3) 0) CDCDONN -41 N f i v � �OX a Oo ( OO O OWO - NOO � OOCoOwNO000WV Cl) Z000000 -4 O -I 00000 D � � O OOOOOA Oo W00 ( � A 00 00o0000CD0000 w ; N � aax � o N O O W N N -+ to A W N N N V (r A W N V A W W NNN -+ Z ' '�-1 X O (TOOOA — CD . .1 n W -+ tA (n � tD V w � NV (D V CDNAO V AOOD (7 � z 'b � 0000000000000ooao0000aCo 00P0oom �? � C ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 6) 64 N 69 69 69 69 6)69 69 69 69 69 69 CA v (r. O i NJ OD P CNN W� (�nW � N W� NV��AA N tn (wD r%) n ' oho X '-•{ '--I 69 69_ (A_ �q O N O W N A. CD (.) 0) V to CD W O OD N O C)t A ()f co O W C7 V OJ O CD (T to OD O ; O to O CO A 0) A. N O (J, -4 -4 VO � tr W Q) 00AO) 0) CO to V NW (n ; _ CTl O W OOP CD (7) A (n O (n W . C" V OO OOANO NOOOONO00 -•{ , tri 00 0000P 00000PO0P 000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P o 0 0 0 0 P O o P 0 0 a -� bC) ; N fax .� ; _ NN 0000 NNNAW � -+ W W00NNO0N (DV V-+ (No0NVC) ANNN� NO -00D+ �m xO AO 14SAb, WtDV (nNNNNWN zz z` i m 0000000oa00000000 5v m0000000000000 00000 � 0N0N000 69 loo 69 69(A W 69 69 69 () ; O� N M(A 0)T ':2 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N W�iD 69 69 IV V .-• � OD (rAP .... W �� - C" n (DCOOK) -4L" O ' AOoo0 tD N WN WOOD Q) A VNOWON4INNONA W V AODOANCDCD NpoX 'A N (n tO Cn (n tpO � A (n V V O N O O (n w N O A O O j (n OOpP� V Nco W -i ; �O ON � N VO (n to CD Cn (n w 0000CD . . . . . NAO O) � OOU O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 616 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 t» O O O O O O O O 0 Oj O O 25 O O O 0 0 O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O 0 O O to - (rCnCnCnCnAAAAA AAAAAW W W W Wt�) W'Wz -'I 0 0 1 Z -+ Aca to a OD V 911 A WN � OCD OD VOtnA W . 3 z m "�'` ;aX 0. 0 vvvv� OOmo = czi: czi: czi� 00 < o � o m ? n D mz -: v -� � - - O Ovm -q -� -Izz � z (D n 2 p = xmmcn� CoDDDDO Q0go - z * - -omm -z1Dn ? a fez � ; m zcn =� ;u Cl) Cl) czi� Vziz r v � < nn � � Z ; N C a 0 c� DO - G� OxxX �r -1 -IC� TDDpp � � (� � ZE 41 � D 0 -nM m22wwwwy Om > - o � � D � a �' _ Z7 zm -: D -I _ cncncncn 0D � XX r O ? D � � v '- cnzcncnWCn= o_ � -zi �'i < zz < vnmT m i a p� 3 � v -� Ocncncntnm p � D c� G� G� (� < 0m -n m O pmD � � � v � v D — O -I cn -- � n Q° D r T T Z A - - - - D r — A a cn v 0 r W � � = �n - mmmm� a' < vcnZ � - - x00 C° m ; zGu� > ° D < -q O Cn zT Cn Kv - C)2gq > u) Oc� cn C - - (A4) 1 � p n D [rl fn —1 00 D m = � = -0i � � ooln� -1 ; gym -/iClCl) 0VIrI � � < � Q �G D r O � mN � vv -a o K � mm � n n0 _I ; q (� Cl) r .i m9 rpm -0 -u I.D.• --nCA) < � rm- < � C) Z w D m0 3 = D0 � = = -i kC/) � DD �CA < -n c 0 ; '� C T ; m M 3 N U) = m m In cnv j, Z = 3 m � � mCn 0 0 Cl) ;lum m m ; a o0 rrl� < (t7rrrrr r rr ((�11rrrrm�TI ((�171rrr C z CnTI T , .nl- T Ct (nDTTT .-n . T z ; 0 A 8 -+ N W O W CD WAO VCn 00 OwA � Cn (DOo z ' SCAN -+ NNOD V cDN Oo0 -+ � 00 W rl) C0Go0 v N O ! 0C) -+ � 4o O Z1z ; ��•1x0zCn0C ; D 0ooCAC) 00000 00000r:> 0000 iota zz • -a o io 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 o 0 o m W m < a x W 0000000000 000000oogaooO p < cnm ; C df 44 N N Ca" 0 Z . r A d► V N 69 69 69 69 69 fA(A 69 A 69 A 69 N W W —ta A A C17 z q0 N W N (p (n N W N N N O W A V A (D n ; V -+ ONNANNAOVfn cn W OO Cn O Cn O) A W� OOD� O : aax Cn to 0M — 0A0o V CON cn N000 W OOAOcn (AON W t 0 O O O C A 0 0 0 0 0 0 A O O O O O O O O O O O O O •-1 p t n a ; Z 03 o O w 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; Do a '- z O Cn O O O N O O O O O O W O O O O O O O (D O O O O O o o N n _ _ _ Tc ? � axrN �, O Cl) K.) + � AAAONj -+ N � Z ' -� x00 0 . p0 np V . AA O 000 � 0000 Cn NCnO (7 6oCDoo0o000 0000v+ oo00ooCDom W !'� r00 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 Cl Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p X z _3 69 4A N N K cn 6+ 69 N 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 A A In In A A 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 O -+ t0 to A NOO N (� W� A N N � � Cn OD A WT mto 4A 0 W w ...i V OOD O cn0 p, p V ut W 000 NA CA�IA� VO O ; �O �O Xa O CD CD V CD nOD NON " NOOO cn OA W ONO VO 0) ; o -+ O ONONOOOOOOD O OOOOOC) C) Ul000 -{ (n 0 o O O O O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o to C. 0000000000 N 0000000000000 NwN tb A a a ; V 0 - .... V W .� C ; K a cn w D O OOONNN -+ � W A 00 N � W 00 ON — Z "'1 xO o � 0000 <DwcD � 1Woojcnv, cnoo � rnAn z 'v � n 0000000000 00000o0oaC)0aom �? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p -� zan ; Vcn 'A �q °O m � O ; A 69 69 CA 69 69 Cn fA 69 69 69 fA N A 6 N ffl z ; 69 UiA -+ CWl�69 CNn N � v8 W OD N�� (TO 0 tD -� Cn (WDOODNODNOWO V W (D V O N NE V W W (D Co O ; v O O O W O W o A (D a O W w co O O O O CA to N O O V co N--► VC 00) O -+ OON � � A O> CAOOOC) OOOCT ODO --{ U 0M Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b -J O O O CD O O O O O O O O O Cl 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A cn a -n N � DD . W x� ��y KoCC�o a CO NN coOD CC) Z ^ x0 7zC O � D OD OD 47N00 W VW OD lOOACn A zz ; mD � 0000000000 Ooo0oo000o006In m0000000000 a00000 w . --N C M 69 69 Can EA EA 69 69 EA EA 69 <n 69 p A O N 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 t0 N N N to W Cn N W 69 0 ' N J� (- (7 � •'n -� b9W NNtp W ...� CT -+ N �� -+ cnONaDN�� oDO � 0 ; Ooo --1r0 ; A cn N co OD N O) Cn A Cr O -co A CD(D V OD V V O CD N ; �D 0o x 41 Cn t0 O W WC) W WO ODA (n )DO (DAO WOONODOCDCD "'1 ; 00 10 Cn O9) ODp9) 9) A00 A ODOW (DOOOoA00000 0oU a o N O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 D f O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U /D&l - 3 _ W NNN0) (.n Z •.� ; O O 1 z O co 0D V (A C" A W N -+ O (D W V (n W A W N .� p CO Ocy V C" A W N p m ; w a; 0 v >* oD ao 02 w aD o0 02 w m o 0D o w m aD o q o oD aD O O D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tom- n +err zQ � ov— v_ v_ ov— 00000v— v— v— oo— o_ o— v_ v_ _ o m � ; = D n � mDDDDDDDD55D; 55DDDDDD000v0000 - f m < m00000000000000000000 T> DDDDDDD N �° z D zm =i � xxx � � � � � � � � � ovvvovvcncncntncncncncn - o -1 D c) X0 ; , , -, -. -. � , , , , , , xao � x � � � vvvovvov � � D -ix000waooaD000DOD00oDwwwwwww � � ;0 ;0 ;0w ;o ;lu ;u 0 C" C" CJ) 0 Cn (J) W W w W W W W W T r D fn (n fn (n !n fn fn cn to 0 0 (A 0 cn Ln m-I O _ cn cnnn� � cnn �n �n� cn cn to CD co) v) cn ;IomZ- -• - qmo � co � � � v � cncncncncncncncn v ; p ,b t- 90 ANO � ANO �' � 'O � � :2 :2 VT z -� D < oocn � 0urn 0? ; mmmmmmm m n 7 ; _ -i o � � o mmmmmmmvvT � � v � v co ' � � � --I Qx O2ANQmmODrnANQmm- oommmmmmmm 0 m DT 000mv -0vvvvm aorna n� o - < O -�Ozmmm -u -i -ammmmm u—U :» �. � Oo � a? � A NO W O� � M ^-1 = 22 —Ixx00� a) ANQQN � ..� �a � 00� � o jfn Z7 -� -1 2- m m O aD q A N Q Q O ; a(n - -j -1x2xx 00000 D � Qmm z ; CA 69 m - � XX mmmmmUTvvvvOMMM � mm v -u - vv mmmmmu c w (Am � 7 ; mzz -a - -i -i -; x = T vvTv -i � � a� R1 ccn Z Z Z n n n x x x 2 x 2 2 2 2 2 x 2 2 O o ; xx Cn a a O r < rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr C � z 0 W �1T -1 'T1 �1Tl.TITTTTTTT :n -nTITT �1 'T17n -n -n -n -n -n -n -n -n z ; v=i ; z w Or o N _ W W Cn W N -+ N CA p� .1 � Coco N � O A -4 0 to " N) (D V O A (" N � W W OO A V 0) " : D : A ; O W O) W OOD V N VOGn WNCTc,IiW000ONODONOVOwi00)i -S 0 Z ' W 0A00W0 -+ C " WO -Ixo > . Cv ;; D(p O t" 00000 inL" C" 000000 " -4 � V � V V � m m0O000000000000000 0W CJ a W 69 v► 6969 EA 69 69 69 �+. m ") oz ; D 69 69 69 69 W Cn O N N CT Cn ; W N A AON v -p 41, ip CTc NW NOD aoNW ONA W �! O C� Ol � ,,,j N0 _O w8 W (Jn O C" 0<" A a = (A O O W W AAN OW — W NAm W O ; aX O ClN WO OW V V V N W V A -+ WOt" w W WOw N0O wAND) -• 0 ; 7-1 Z OCDOODONAN CJf OO 0 DK) NOOOogo0wNOCJ( WO -+ V O0 c � O W OOOOOOOOtJcf,)) Ot" CJCU) 000Oo00N " V( o0t" O [T ; W � `-O (" 0000000000000000a 0000C" 0 maoo00 ; CDA 'o v C 3 a x m p v 0 0 (J) A W GJ W N V A A w W W W V O) L" W W W N 0 W C n AWGJ w to .� X O r) O Oo Cn .-- ppp Oao p . pCnA OO NOCOn z o0000oOOi" CD00000000000000oao0otom m m 0 0 0000000000000000000000 xz, 7 O0 -- (A N 69 69 y9 d9 69 69 69 tr9 69 69 X x ; A 69 69 69 69 G-A t" " w A a N C ; W CO fA CA -` W W N O V O OD (O W N CO CO N W V Cn (D O V W V o ; N Na CJ) A V 0 V V Cn N (D N OOcO CJiO (" OOtJCNt" OON � O) OA O ; b � A ' O COONNOA BOO V N (O N OD WOOOO W A. A A (A w Cn OD Cn CO Ln to v 7- A 90 O O W CA OD WOW OwCnO W00000000000ACn O -� 0S � O CD O O O O O ClO O O o O 0 0 0 O Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 O O CDO O CDO O O CD 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 W W N N N N N N W W W W w w W w w w w w W W A A A A A A A A22 Z ' --J X O 0 ; . . t" co (O cD CD CO (D CO CO oD OD W aD oD 00 W OD W W OD OD O O o O O O O O t7 a7 hz.7 O O O O A A Ak A A A V V V V V V V 0 0 0 O O O O W W W W W W W W m 0 0 0 Cn Ln (y, CJc Uc al (n ul Ln m L" m Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X � 00 00 69 N 69 69 69 to 69 d9 69 69 69 b9 \ a 69 69 W lA fA A 69 69 69 (J 69 OD N (R 69 (D O A N W V O A 69 69 W N W N A C" W (WD .V.• N A 0 ' W N O W tD W (D N (n A O pD (O (p W W O O O O 40 -+ Q1 A A O N 0 ; A N N v W O -+ OD CD V Oo W 00 W co b. A CJ) co ...• Cl OO 00 ADO OOA VOtO CD OO CO V O fn O co O N :N O A Vf V W 0 O W 0 0 0 0 0 O A O V C" W O N N 00 O v w t� Z O V OOD (n O) .-. A Cn V NON V N0000000VO -+ O OD N 00 0) 41 Wto v W ; O W O C" O CD (Jc O W O (A C" O L" (" 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 LA _ O (O OD V O Cn A W (O V O) C" A W N (D co W Cn CA A W N Z ; --j X O m --1 ; aDV NCAOOODODODOOA -+ O -+ NAOONtOCpCAtOAOOAOtD (DONCn (D (7 .:.t z � m ; M OW (AW W W W Ww -� W WOV -+ O (O N -+ O W (A w CD N4 AWOC" m a) mm a1 ; M N O A O O W D) O O V V A CO W W -+ A O I(A O (D w O V W (O C" V V aao ' °° rzcn w 6�9 69 N FA j9 4A 69 fA 69 6'9 69 (A w�A 69 EA 69 f a m n ' �� y) N� WNA � Cn � AAA A�� .AAONv�i ONo � tAp At~i, ONO V O oo W V rczi) A N co 69 N W 8 CJc V A O V Cn CD A O V 0 O W 0 N (" N �_ � � �A (D A O W V (D O cD O N (D W U) A (D W A CO V V Ln A N O (D O -t 10 O co W OD V( N (O V W W C" t" A W -+ O Cn A � W 2L) W 2, 00,, t0 0 Cn O) O W CD tD co Cn CJc V(" Cn A 0 o W O N �! O V N N W -+ O W AOD Ow to .0 � W Cn (" tD0000 N O O N 0 (D w A ON A v 3 _ W w Ut j Ut A AAA A A A A A A W W W W W W W W Z 1 O O Z A W N O (D . V W N A W N -+ O (� O V O) Ut A W N p m i Q7 rx xXDD0D � ODODODODX OO � o � zzzc� c) von 3 � O � w � 0 '+�' pm -Ip -i -� � 0Ovp (� n0 -um � � -1zz9 - z o c� nm � m DDDDv Q, �„ cnr z • zzz � c� kbz =3 f m r Zx � m � � cncncncn0 zzOx = °oM00[ 00 m i N ra D cn — x — Wv0OVD cncnzrcn � apW -{ -imnz O0 � D c� DG7 Op �1 �1 � :Ur- -1C� � DDppoo � c7 2 OT2 (72 wwww � _ a Zm -ID -i � cncn (A (A0 028zwm ' 2R � ' o � D v� r O D c� - ozcnmv - - v v � _� ; -a ; ;u ;aC3 nzcncncntn= o -ice < zz < -uQm ' m a3 O � 3 � 0 -10 (nfnfn (nm p � D � n00 (� < m0oT0 3 ;_la � +n CO) O pmDj Dvvvv D — O � cn � � n p ;v fp r TVZl+ - - - - Dr — Arnim c C/' = cn - mmmmr- N < vcnZ � = = � vZO CD ; zoo a D W � � TIn0� mC n < < 1,D bwT -gyp n D O -i z0g . — 02CnoD W OOw cn cnwx � 0 ; O -i m 2 x ao � X co p cn cn cn z D < - CO ( D p x m o O p -i -1 O p t7 1 0 -� r mcn mNvmm D w � K � mm � v� -_I n Cl) D M -0 � <0 �m x c DD T m3 tn -ix m m c c c y cco .n t7 CA 3 m "i Zn O m 17 O h m X a cp v A A ;0 �R , L a O rrm < ;nrrrrr Uorn'! r ((1�l ((T�1cCFQcnT T TT T TT TT TTDD T TT Z i Z w cD w i�� O) Aw CD O CA CID ZN8N co " � o 00 o POV p O I I + '01 o (n o rno vC 3axM00 —1 o Ln C.) cncnoo ACD � ocwi, -� aoAMZ_ 7 -1x0 � C D O � m � A �I fTAA �I CDO O -+ N V A00 . U( O z W , 00000 (noo (no ov+ 00000 (n00000m � tnOOC7 0000000000 0000000000000 p < Xn � C to !A N �r, NO r COi 4�i 69 (A to 69 69 69 69 10J 69 69 69 W 69 N W 6969 b9 A (t'1 Vzi ,y.' O V 7L 6 W N W N V A W V V C7 0 0 (n W N (O(AO Cn W O ! � rn m 0 (D + -70 V <n0) 0 V O (JT (n00 -• AOo VCnW VODN CD O O1X O W (O V CO OAN CD CnCTOOOOwNOUtCn W O COc V O) 00) O) CnP .N CTU( OD O 0700000NA00000 -1 ; 00 - I Z 0 0 0 ?• 0 0 0 0 (n O W o 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — O C 7 O O O U l O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O A b N (P a _ _ _ C„ CD _ vC ; 3aztTlocn O O O O W W W W W Uf NO O A W AOCNn � O -• � Z i .� XOC"' n O OOOC7 W NOO 0000 � 0000000 V Ul n ...1 o (n00000000 0000 � 00000cnoom O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p ° X O to to 00 00 X 00 V to 69 fA T EA fA b9 fA 69 H9 fo 69 \ \ X C tT ul 69 to 69 69 69 69 69 to tD 469 j 00 N N N V A D7 OD N Ut (n CST (�D V ((n - W v -N.. 0 w A , (7 ; V OD OA A-co N (0 co N W 01 CD A000 - KI (D0WN (O � N O C) 00 OOO (DOUICDN V C) V OOOO V OCOCDOUNODO (n ; A O i -� N OA O -+ ON A A 00 O) OOOOOOOOOO CAmO - ; A � M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O CI O O C) C) O C) O C) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w O) w � � � C 1 � ax ^1O O O (nNNNNNN W W CnO wn z O N O W O A . . . . CD C, O O (W A W CD O O O A V (") IZ m W l'(7 O 0 (000wwww b60CD (nUt0000 VON (]m O 0000000000 0000000000 (noU, p X to to o0 00 0 1 En A 69 69 fA 6969 8 fA fj fA 69 O 69 69 A W fA N W 69� A t0 NN W � NC7 W OUt_� A (O (DNjU1 � U1O)W � NOD � n i W wX r N N (n w O A w -+ V (O <0 N ...• O W W O W DD W O O) W p ; N N v ('1 A co OU( O •-� A D7 U1 (OAO Q) AUt0 C) (A Co fW W (n W CD cn ; wtn � O V O N O . O Co N (D N V 5n 0 0 0 0 0 Ul CD D) 0 0 V N O - ; w (n A z A O OOD ONO CDO A, 0000 60000 �CD (n 00 W 0000000000000 � v � ,...1 1 CO 8ANO) NNN � C7 V CWoN jO) I A W Cn -+ � Z ' 3XZ � --1 , ITI O (D �l O W N O (O N A W O O N CD V CO N W (p-+ W OD O (O N (D V A W O O W F A W � N O) w m � ca m m a7 1 m O A fD O (D CO -+ CT U Vt w V 0 (n W V O V O) Cn -+ A 0 O 3 1 ...1 aao to � n A V to to Q) V (A fA fA fA 69 69 n oho -1 t—M(1 O ' O O N to 69 69 N to 69 69 W N fo W to�6y99 W A N ..► � W N W N W (D N W A W A cD (D �GH A O D I w V I"' (z/� ; C) W NODN N (n N mC> w N W W A WO (0 CD wN (D ACn cn ; � p� O :-'1 O N CO -•• w CO A Ul w w w N A W -+ DD N W (n C" V A W A -1 ; %0 O S CO 00 (n -+ (O W O V W V W O W N O (D V OD N A V 10 0 C N t0 Ca N CO M V CD 0 V - O m (7 O O O C) --� A A W (n V N V W C, A co OD OD N OD CT O C) A OD C) C) N O O O A V O) C) m C) SAMI sA3 clal Lsr sH sP �j 10 sat x sH x � s°' g�M 5A4 S01 1fl TbOMAS M bQa � ' 580 ,Y A- 284A aa SLR6El A-7 I 281 2811 2W 287 2M2 2A 286 1OW t I 2B3 289 2B5 2810 284 J SC1 5D 501 3A2 I 2C 2L 2H 2F L 2P r d{ 2E 20 2R 211 A S a;. ' I ( I � I I 1 IA NORTHWEST JJ KVyY EAST �z w•e- I 2M 800. x z _ _� �0 B 6AIA b 2A1C I I i I 2A1 I 2 x 11A 118 A i i I IIE 3A ,AI � < o THO Q W A-474 I S SA -m I / 110 I � 3 J8 __ 1103 6A _ 6C MI D� 6H I 1 r - — 4A ' I � 11DI 6K pCl City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM 1%W September 15, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Bank Depository Agreement The City entered into a bank depository agreement in October 1992 with Texas National Bank, Southlake. The agreement was for a two year period ending September 30, 1994, with the option for an additional two-year term upon mutual consent of the City and Depository. The City attorneys reviewed the existing agreement and recommended certain changes. These changes ensure compliance with the Financial Institutions Reform and Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) regarding the protection of collateral pledged to secure city funds in excess of the FDIC insured amount. Texas National Bank officials have reviewed this agreement and are scheduled to approve it at their September 20 Board meeting. This agreement will begin October 1, 1994 and end September 30, 1996. The bank has provided excellent services to the City during the past two years and staff recommends the approval of this depository agreement. FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS 3400 BANK ONE TOWER 500 THROCKMORTON STREET FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102-3821 %W TELEPHONE 318 3400 580 FAX(817)332-4740 Of Counsel MARY E. DRAKE Licensed in the States of Texas and Illinois August 30, 1994 Lou Ann Heath Finance Director City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Bank Depository Agreement Dear Lou Ann: ,,. I have reviewed the City of Southlake Bank Depository Agreement with Texas National Bank which you provided to me. I have made certain changes in the agreement which ensures its compliance with the Financial Institutions Reform and Recovery and Enforcement Act, as regards the protection of collateral pledged to secure city funds in excess of the FDIC insured amount. I also enclose for your files a Policy Statement of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation which speaks specifically to the FDIC response to the North Arkansas Medical Center v. Bartlett case which I discussed in my letter to you of May 23, 1994. According to this statement, "FDIC will not seek to avoid a security interest solely because the secured obligation or collateral subject to the security interest was not acquired by the institution contemporaneously with the approval and execution of the security agreement granting the security interest and/or may change, increase, be subject to substitution from time to time during the period that the security interest is enforceable and perfected" In reading the entirety of this document it seems clear to me that the only provision that I suggested in the May 24, 1994, letter to you which is not required is the one regarding a written instrument contemporaneously with substitution. I have not included this provision, therefore, in the document which is enclosed. i0�-z Lou Ann Heath August 30, 1994 Page 2 *AW If you have any additional questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, I"' Mary E. Drake MED/re enclosure f.\fi1es\md\so1ake\heath011tr STATE OF TEXAS § ' %W COUNTY OF TARRANT§ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT The CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ("City") and the TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, ("Depository"), agree to the following: Article I Definitions In this Agreement: (A) Demand deposit means a deposit of funds that may be withdrawn on demand of the City. (B) Time deposit means a deposit of funds which the City may not withdraw until the expiration of a certain period following written notice of the City's intent to withdraw the funds. (C) Treasurer means the Director of Finance for the City. Article II Term The term of this Agreement is two years, beginning October 1, 1994, and expiring September 30, 1996. Article III Depository Services and Obligations (A) Depository agrees to serve as the City's central depository and to provide full banking services to City for accounts as designated by the City. (B) Upon written authorization or oral authorization confirmed in writing, from the City's director of finance, Depository shall execute investment transactions on behalf of the City. Depository shall place all City owned securities in safekeeping with either the City, a City approved third party financial institution, or the Federal Reserve Bank. Depository shall provide the City with safekeeping receipts on all securities and investment transactions in a timely manner. (C) Depository shall: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE I f:\files\md\solake\sldepositagr 3 (1) faithfully keep the City's funds and faithfully perform the duties and obligations imposed by law on a depository for a public entity; (2) pay on presentation all properly signed checks on a City demand deposit account with Depository; (3) release all funds in a City time deposit account to the City after the required period of notice; (4) account for the City funds as required by law. (5) maintain separate, accurate, and complete records relating to all deposits of City funds, the pledged securities, and all transactions relating to the pledged securities which records shall meet the requirements of paragraph (B) of Article IV relating to compliance with 12 U.S.C. 1823(e); and (6) provide a statement of its financial position at least quarterly and an annual statement audited by outside auditors, including a statement by its outside auditors as to its fair presentation (D) This Agreement does not limit the City's prerogative to invest funds through institutions other than Depository. Article IV Collateral for City Funds (A) Amount. To secure City funds, Depository shall pledge securities in an amount equal to the amount of funds on deposit in Depository; except, that security is not required for the deposit of City funds to the extent the funds are insured under 12 U.S.C. 1811-1832. (B) Compliance with the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (12 U.S.C. §1823(e)). Each transaction involving the pledging, substitution, release, or alteration in any manner, of securities given to secure city funds shall be: (1) in writing; (2) be approved by the Board of Directors of the Depository; (3) be reflected in the minutes of the Board of Directors; and CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE 2 f:\files\md\solake\sldepositagr ' (4) remain, continuously, from the time of its execution, an official record of the 114r Depository. (C) Authorized Collateral. Depository may pledge as security any of the following investments: (1) a direct obligation of the United States; (2) an obligation that in the opinion of the Attorney General of the United States is a general obligation of the United States and backed by its full faith and credit; (3) an obligation,the principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States; (4) an obligation of an agency or instrumentality of the United States, including a mortgage-backed security of the agency or instrumentality; and (5) a general or special obligation issued by a public agency, payable from taxes, revenues, or a combination of taxes and revenues that has been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized rating agency and that has a current rating of not less than A or its equivalent. (D) Safekeeping. (1) Depository shall place pledged securities for safekeeping in a custodial account with a custodial institution approved by the City. The custodial institution shall be either: (a) a Federal Reserve Bank; (b) the Texas Safekeeping Trust Company; or (c) a state or national bank which: (i) is domiciled within this state; (ii) has been designated a state depository by the State Depository Board; (iii) has a capital stock and permanent surplus of not less than $5 million; and (iv) is not owned or controlled by the Depository or its holding company. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE 3 f:\f iles\md\solake\sldeposit agr A5? (2) Safekeeping shall be in accordance with a safekeeping agreement r between the City, Depository, and the custodial institution which shall meet the requirements of paragraph (B) of this Article relating to compliance with 12 U.S.C. 1823(e), and paragraph (C) describing the types of securities which qualify as collateral and authorizing release of the securities only upon joint written authorization of the City's representative and an authorized representative of Depository. (E) Substitution. Depository may substitute securities meeting the requirements of this Agreement only upon receipt of a written agreement with the City authorizing the substitution, which shall meet the requirements set out in paragraph (B) of this Article, relating to compliance with 12 U.S.C. §1823(e). Depository shall provide to the City, a monthly statement including par value, market value, interest rate, and maturity date of the securities held in safekeeping. (F) Representations. Depository represents to the City that: (1) the Depository is the sole legal and actual owner of the securities deposited in safekeeping as collateral for City deposits; (2) no other security interest has been, nor will be, granted in the securities deposited in safekeeping as collateral for City deposits; and (3) Depository is insured by the FDIC for all uncollateralized City deposits. Article V City Supervision (A) The City shall designate the character and amount of City funds that will be demand deposits and that will be time deposits. (B) The funds of the City may be paid out of Depository only on the checks of the Treasurer of the City with signatures affixed as follows: (1) for all checks other than payroll checks and payroll checks of $5000 or more, two signatures, facsimile or actual, are required from among the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tern, City Manager, or City Secretary; (2) for payroll checks of less than$5000, one signature, facsimile or actual, is required from among the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tern, City Manager, or City Secretary. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE 4 kw f:\f ices\md\solake\sldepositagr A - 7 Article VI Fees The City shall compensate Depository for its banking and depository services solely according to the fee schedule attached as "Appendix A'. This fee schedule may be amended at any time during the term of the Agreement upon mutual written consent of the City and Depository. Article VII Termination (A) Default. The City may terminate this Agreement upon default of Depository. Depository shall be in default if it: (1) fails to pay all of a matured certificate of deposit, including earned interest at the specified maturity date; (2) fails to pay upon presentation of a properly signed check when sufficient funds are available, the full amount of the check; (3) fails to maintain securities in safekeeping with the custodial institution equal in value to City deposits; (4) has been adjudicated a bankrupt; (5) has filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy; (6) has been closed by an agency of the federal government; or (7) has been placed in receivership. (B) If default occurs, the Treasurer shall have authority to transfer or liquidate the securities deposited in safekeeping at a custodial institution as collateral for City deposits in Depository. If the security is transferred, ownership of the security will transfer entirely to the City. If the security is liquidated, any proceeds over the value of the defaulted amount of the matured investment, including accrued interest plus expenses related to the liquidation transaction, shall be returned to the Depository. Article VIII Assignment This Agreement may not be assigned. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE 5 f:\f i les\md\solake\sldeposit.agr Article IX Requirements for Effectiveness This Agreement shall not be effective until approved by the Board of Directors of the Depository. Such approval shall be reflected in the Minutes of the Board of Directors. This Agreement shall remain continuously, from the time of its execution and approval by the Board of Directors, an official record of depository. EXECUTED this day of , 199 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: TITLE TEXAS NATIONAL BANK By. TITLE APPROVED this day of , 199 Chairman, Board of Directors TEXAS NATIONAL BANK CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT PAGE 6 f:\files\md\solake\sldcpositagr 14, - 9 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT TEXAS NATIONAL BANK October 1, 1994-September 30, 1996 APPENDIX "A" FEE SCHEDULE Account maintenance per month $10.00 each , Checks paid $.11 each Deposits Credited $.30 each Items deposited not drawn on this bank $.06 each Return items-charge backs $2.50 each Per roll of coin $.10 each Per strap of currency $.50 each Special Statements $3.00 each FDIC Insurance rate per $1,000 account balance as set be FDIC Investment Services Actual Cost Accounts Payable Computer Form Checks No charge Payroll Computer Form Checks No charge (Both per City specifications) Locking Bags No charge Zipper Bags No charge Coin Wrappers No charge Overdraft Fee Negotiated Loan Rate (3-5 year term) Negotiated Earnings credit on average collected investable balance net of reserve requirements and FDIC insurance is based on the 90 day T-bill rate. /De -xo City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Employee Group Health Insurance Since fiscal year 1990, Texas Municipal League has provided health/dental/life insurance coverages for City employees. The TML plan is a conventional fully-insured PPO (Preferred Provider Organization)plan. The rates the City has paid during the past several years have been competitive, however, City staff wanted to explore the market and the different insurance products and programs that have become available. In July the City contracted with an independent benefits consultant, RWL Group of Richardson, Texas, to issue requests for proposal (RFP) for employee medical, dental and prescription drug coverages. Eighteen firms submitted proposals, some of which were dental only or medical only. Several firms were eliminated from consideration based on a number of factors. A proposal tally of the firms and the reasons for elimination are attached. RWL submitted five finalists: TML, Harris 1%W Methodist, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, MetLife, and Mutual of Omaha. City staff initial review eliminated MetLife from consideration due to the limited number of local service providers. All plans result in a dollar savings to the City. Southlake pays 100% of the employee costs for insurance. Dependent cost is paid by the employee. The current high rates have prevented some families from obtaining coverage, therefore this cost was a consideration also. The cost analysis is listed below: TML TML Mutual Existing proposed BC/BS Harris (£Qimta PPO Rates-employee $188.01 $161.21 $128.01 $155.79 $147.90 dependent $273.81 $273.81 $260.81 $226.88 $257.17 HMO Rates-employee n/a n/a n/a $132.04 $112.14 dependent n/a n/a n/a $192.30 $228.13 Dental Rates-employee $14.54 $14.54 $14.43 $14.05 $14.48 dependent $21.87 $21.87 $25.78 $36.15 $24.65 (Canada Life) $16.32 $33.77 (Fortis) 1oiJ - I ,. Curtis E. Hawk Employee Group Health Insurance September 16, 1994 Page 2 RWL provides an analysis of all the plans, benefits and estimated cost savings to the City based on 99 covered employees. The estimated annual cost savings for each plan is listed on page 7 of the analysis. Staff reviewed the proposals with Council representatives and the City Manager. The Harris proposal was given consideration due to their extensive network and expanding presence in the metroplex. However, there are several items in their program that make total employee cost greater than the other plans. The Harris HMO and PPO programs contain a maximum out-of-pocket expense of $2,000 per year. This is a plan provision that cannot be altered, according to Harris. The TML and BC/BS plans are both $1,000, and Mutual PPO is $1,500. The Harris HMO also charge 20% of hospital room and ancillary charges, the same as their PPO. Harris requires that the employer (the City) choose either the HMO or the PPO plan. The annual savings for the HMO is $66,492 and $38,277 for the PPO. The HMO monthly dependent rates are $81.51 less than the current plan, and the PPO dependent rates are $46.93 less. The Harris plan rates are good for one year. The Blue Cross/Blue Shield plan includes an extensive network of providers. The dental plan allows choice of selected providers or a dentist of choice. The estimated annual savings is $71,280. The plan rates were good for one year, and two years on the life insurance. The monthly dependent rates are $13 less than the current plan. The Mutual of Omaha plan allows employees to select the PPO or HMO plan, therefore the savings would probably be somewhere between the listed annual savings of$47,651 and $90,134 for each plan (or about $70,000). The Mutual plan contains the Baylor Hospital and Harris Hospital systems, and an extensive network of physicians. The HMO monthly dependent rates are $45.68 less than the current rates and the PPO dependent rate is $16.67 less. The HMO plan includes a 10% rate cap for the subsequent year and 15% rate cap on the PPO plan. All of the plans will save the City money. Given all the factors involved in the analysis, staff recommends the Mutual of Omaha plan. This plan will allow the City to offer employees a choice of a PPO or HMO, and lower monthly dependent insurance costs. LAH �0b-Z ' J Q a F w - w c o z 0 Mu w v C9 _J N '2 qNq 2 A �J ��.. p cr QjQ �J� � 7ay •� 2 d w w w w p r islcWIN. A e w M 2 NI4 2 A w Z 2 A W N C p00000000011 00 .0 :00 0 Boom o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 l 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 U. V a W I i i 1 o 1 1 1 -t A-1 -t 1 a- I I I I 1 I i I a. a. a. c m � IIIIIIIIIIillllllillii 0 v 0 U. i i l i 10 1 1 0 o I o 0 1 0 ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w� a NVO� IiI ! l119lI. OI0t1a111011 aE a LL E E ` a cd CL 4p o w � CO z1111 �10Ot� li .t011i1111100 � � Ew v IL E 2E > I11I11IIolfooioloolll0ma e LL toE ¢ u E y yy Q Q a YJ' z z0lllilfllliil111111 g e 0 g 0 0 E O w C z z fall IL U. C c .� � � } Y1 .t1111111111111111 � � w ' (� (7 < m SOJ fU.aKFI� m:W. Zw w .-'N o!�f N m !� W D) � � w� 'f N./0 I� aD � N h • wr O zz � z L0b -3 .a a z C w P p P tu ou € 8E888 A � 0 p u �. pO \ � `e `Q � N 1�•f u Op � Y � .�� Vl O �7 p `u' O O U V V 4 9 p p o Asaz zz o s paaaaa p � u X h 6 u b 7 A � E 0 c . Q � i • i ! ! • N � A O � Y -� 7 q y y y C a h 7 .n N N N N N N r( C O � pP t k rs ppp C. u 3 E'O k'� E O 'O U a a x .E E f3 o E t� e� o0 00 'p r x .a ouopp q uqtt u u t utgg u Q u Q Q Q Q Q a Z j 30 u t o i • ! • ! ! N C' Y N D C a e e e e e e C. .p T O F� Oy� v1 CT M NT N N f�`! y a Y e Y C y •5� t: � '� u C p En m V tui u tui u u p O u a = a = a = z z Lr p O q E O z y� E r oO0 o R o n s a" w aCD t r r + f • f f ! i p` Y � � V 8 0 0 o e o o N u yj � en N NT N NT 72 'O V E� m " a y a o dEaarX zz y z p o E u u u z . O .n F z w 8 go $ w � w � w v u u u Q u O E p u 0 3 V ra x r 3 ° e FQ e ° p� E o u a u .E u Q 4 E e _. flit `• .a cC f� cC ¢ w c _ ° m a ¢ h E i� wa z E Ewa w U = r job— L .a zg � 64 Got 88 � $ � $ $ z 8 � z AH o 0 o w w W 8 W N H iA x x z Z ,Z .Z N e N � N H 9 O N N b N � H H x w w w 8 8 8 e e o C 8 Y a e a a e .+1 Vl Al 0 0 0 O N O O N N O S g.0 Y O O O S O O H N H nt N ,Z NZ z H H to N Y m en en N H K H O O O N h h h Q (q K H H H N V] v fA U � � o W v 'S v c v Y `Y � O N in a F i I N 5� r o o 0 0 0 o e e e 0 25 E $ o 0 $ e h h O N N N N h V1 u i H U z a � � a i U u Z a T a V T a q � > v u Ell 0 s c fA PY. o x u E E m u O O o a y v a o a A E a a R o u R 0 Cl. z° .2 a U Y m N ° Y a a z Y a Z° ° z u ° z u ° z Y ° z U O W z Y N " W C W E W A V Y m Y u S g u V U m .:, u u Y .«. Y / � \ f § ƒ \ . g ■ g � = 72 \ \ e ■ a § § } } } } } $ f } \ ® . ^ j \ k ? § \ E as _\ \ } \ f I5 I } \ ru � B � w3 /{ 41 - ] § y � 2 ' 2 tlA 40 e ± / § \ \ 7 ) \ ® ) * k >VC no E / z .r j g ' f § � § �§ t 2 2 g + B + ( ) =� =! b k u i - ( \ = ok § ) 7kk ) \ k � E ) \ ( \ § \ ■ � .■ « � ■ ■ q � � - . . -B -- } k q � « u E � \ / |O � — � a V w x Od p, u 0 0 N N O N ,�. N p .°. .O. O S O .O. .V. w w Yl � w g � M N y,. N 4r w, �_ w eppT, � O O O O V N N Kcx W W -�tG^✓ V O O P. 6 6 KN Vl Vl Vl Vl Yl `q .n w w N is W W w A m w m m < � w m m a m m m m m m m w • w m A m ■ m w w c VI v W U � � o W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a a 7j! Z Z a3 u C � z c 40 ax is C ad u i V u a ' z 40 4 � b 7 O � .Vi V Eaka X n a°a c u .a M i. v u vp u �❑j W � g1 0. wa � o H � A � eov00000 o ve a L pp pp p �p 10 c�nvV W V^1 N V N vaNai .N. b oho ��+1 f� 1a�a f� VN A H H H H K fA 6-4K H K K H W H K H K H z as w C C a U 7o z x c� x 1� 0o ay c O O1 M 1� b f� V1 O 1� by MI b fY Q /`! Vl 00 N m N O. Vl N f.1 1� Yl Yl 7 O� m 1A N m 'A �} N t�l 'A N 44 N fV 64 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H h •L ar O A 06 N O b ./yOyl H H K H K K H H K fA C C/1 v U � � o PO M m oo Z 1L Off. e�.f Z Z Z M N r M Z Z Z vi �+i .o eon} r ry aa M K Cx Y v � � c ydz I Q_ � m Eo K W ooNo m 2Z Z ZZZ ZZZ 22ZZ ZZZZ p, w w L L U c z Co o C 0 a " G G u u In w v4i U w 10 W U p O O a O O a a a. a. py O a a a a a a V V u u u u u Y u uT 'Q u Y u u pT uT 78 PR a o4w m A pww A S cxwww owww 'ram 0.p�wwww � wwww 4 p o o a o o p o s e o0..1 wbo . � / k � � � 2 w / / \ _ 2 _ 10 10 « ; ! « ) 44 S 22 ƒ § ( tK \ \CA \ k j \ / } k ( u2 ■ _ / -al [ fA § A � 3f4n 2 . 2 � � 2 \ § { ƒ § £ \ \ r \ * � � i � ) $i � ƒ k ) 2 $ ! /ƒ { ■ I { % } ) % % $ \ \ƒ — o } \ ( �� Q _ I o a Z O 200 v a0 W -Un 0C1 W11M w v M o�vi v� � ve rroopp 4. iA 6A t� N d•h R z N � f6/ N6A NfA a to to 6A fA a � z a � x c� x a0 00 O n tom. 10 N N M .O 000 0000 O 1M0 071_1N0' : (� M C1 V1 t� 00 MOD M t-w . a. Gq N � (NA6NA N ((A� N64A46 y� 66 fA W GA L. 0 o 03 - z x40 Vi u a u M 10 01 t�+1 M N _ b 00 M a0 � 10 � � 609 iA NiA 6A H �.o. v w ._1 79 00.^. M t 000 �L cd 0 0 0 r- O U O N 10 t` 10 Ow tl W rR 10 [� C4 [�M ti _63 GA 6A M N 10M C CAQq �� .N r a N d zes d-o K �O x N V1 10 iy Y1 W co 00 cc W C3 a0 Ot 00 00 G 6A fA N G M 4Y G !� O ) „ z kca rA z � z � w a E O a 03 y �+ O � F F OG Z U z V F v „ p eo &o p aa a � to � to W WD OE z A ° W S ww, a n°, a x a w O O U a o Q o Q o o U 10 D- iD w cs. 0.1 CC 5 A Fww Fww City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Appointment to Building Board of Appeals Ordinance No. 622, Creating a Building Board of Appeals, was approved by City Council at the regular meeting on September 6, 1994. Council is to appoint a five (5) member board and an additional two (2) alternate members. The terms are for two years. The initial appointment terms are given in Section 2 of the Ordinance, Section 2 and 3 of Ordinance 622 are attached. Section 3 gives the qualifications of members. "Board Members shall constitute a board which is broadly representative of various fields of building construction and building standards." Paul Ward, Chief Building Official, has submitted a list of potential board members that he had talked with and have indicated a desire to serve. Please lace this item on the September 20th council agenda. G�V BW/sm Attachment SEC PION 2. APPOINTMENT AND TERMS The Board shall be composed of five members to be appointed by the city council. In addition, the city council shall appoint two alternate members who shall serve in the absence of one or more regular members. Alternate members must meet the same qualifications as regular board members. An alternate member has voting privileges only when sitting in for an absent member. Regular members shall be appointed to places numbered 1 through 5 and alternate members shall be appointed to places numbered 6 and 7. Upon initial appointment pursuant to this ordinance, members in the odd numbered places shall be appointed to serve terms expiring October 1, 1995 and members appointed to the even numbered places shall serve terms expiring October 1, 1996. Thereafter, the terms of office of the members shall be two years beginning on October 1st of the year of appointment. The terms of the odd numbered places shall expire in the odd numbered years, and the terms of the even numbered places shall expire in the even i numbered years. Board members may be appointed to succeed themselves. Vacancies shall be filled by the city council for the unexpired term. Newly appointed members shall be installed at the first regular board meeting after their appointment. The building official shall be an ex offici member of and shall act as secretary to the Board, but shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. All members of the Board shall hold office at the pleasure of the city council. SECTION 3. QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS It is the intent of the city council that the Board members shall, by reason of diversity of their individual areas of expertise, constitute a board which is broadly representative of various fields of building construction and building standards. In making f:\files\muni\slakc\ordinaac\buildin&brd(08-12-94) 2 appointments to the Board,'the city council will give consideration to persons who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining to building construction, mechanical design, plumbing systems or electrical systems, or who have practical experience in matters relating to building construction or value such as a mortgage banker or licensed real estate agent. Members, except for the building official, may not be employees of the City of Southlake. SECTION 4. ORGANIZATION The Board shall hold an organizational meeting in October of each year and shall elect a chairman and vice-chairman from among its members. The Board shall meet when required to carry out the duties established by this ordinance. The Board shall adopt its own rules and procedures and shall keep a record of its proceedings consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and the requirements of law. The Board shall keep minutes rr of its proceedings showing the vote of each member upon each question, or if absent or failing to vote, indicating that fact, and shall keep records of its decisions and other official actions, all which shall be filed in the office of the city secretary and kept as public records. SECTION S. DUTIES AND POWERS (a) The Board is hereby charged with the duty and invested with the authority to: (1) inspect property and premises at reasonable hours where required in the discharge of its responsibilities under the laws of the State of Texas and the city; (2) hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretation of the technical provisions of the following codes adopted by the City of Southlake: f.\files\muni\slake\ordinanc\buildingbrd(0842-94) 3 r 9/16/95 QUALIFIED CANDITATES for BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS HOME BUILDERS: MASTER ELECTRICIANS: Lane Denman Dennis Roberts Equitable Homes Dennis Electric 220 Creekway Bend 2400 Crooked Lane Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 214 336-1119 817 481-4220 Bobby Harrell Eddie Pierce (Journeyman Electrician) Harrell Custom Homes Dennis Electric 920 S. Peytonville Ave. 1600 Randol Mill Rd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Roanoke, Texas 76262 817 329-6926 817 379-5876 Bob Kresler MASTER PLUMBERS: Bob Kresler Custom Homes Fred Gutierrez 1525 N. Carroll Ave. Fred's Plumbing Southlake, Texas 76092 1720 Oak Lane 817 481-7717 Southlake, Texas 76092 817 481-6818 Kosse Maykus Maykus Custom Homes Tim Long 2604 N. Carroll Ave. Tim Long Plumbing Southlake, Texas 76092 Box 168 Randol Mill Road 817 329-3111 Roanoke, Texas 76262 817 431-1301 Frank Ritz The Ritz Company 100 Latrobe Southlake, Texas 76092 817 421-6264 MASTER MECHANICAL: Gerald W. Shafer Shafer's Heating & Air Conditioning 2702 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 817 481-4403 - page 2 QUALIFIED CANDITATES for BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS ARCHITECT - ENGINEER: r Rick Born P. E. PEP Mike Wright, Architect CNA Insurance Co. 375 Binkley 1218 Morgan Road Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 817 424-3664 817 Rod Zielke, P.E. Don L. Caple P.E. IND. Lichliter Jamison Company Texas Instruments 1090 Burney Lane 1403 Chimney Works Dr. Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 214 630-8867 817 421-9067 David Lynn Carpenter A.I.A P.E. Carpenter & Associates 1211 Oakwood Trail Southlake, Texas 76092 817 488-0565 Office 817 481-3587 Thomas C. Erskine P.E. IND. G. T. E. 700 Lakehurst Ct. Southlake, Texas 76092 817 Darrell Johnson P.E. 2503 Hillside Court Southlake, Texas 76092 817 488-6989 E. E. Taylor, Jr. P.E. PEP Taylor Engineering 579 N. Kimball Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 817 481-7771 Peter N. Taylor, P.E. PEP Taylor Engineering 1575 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 817 481-1974 W. Craig Willan P.E. Omega Engineering 1376 Lakeview Dr. Southlake, Texas 76092 817 488-5828 THE STATE OF TEXAS kb, COUNTY OFF I// iffisA11 I , :.'(0% as a member of the make is of id vit and hereby on oath state th following: I, and/or a person or persons related to me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be peculiarly affected by a vote or decision of the as those terms are defined in Chapter 171 , Texas Local Government Code. /" ^T l The business entity is -rePlAtt5 (name and address) I have a substantial interest in this business entity for the following reasons: (Check all which are applicable) i Ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity. Ownership of 10% or more or $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity. Funds received from the business entity exceed 10% of gross income for the previous year. Real property is involved and have an equitable or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500 . A relative of mine has a substantial interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public body of which I am a member. Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever. Signed this day of vii`/ 19 sign, e o ,!" ficia/ Title I C ( 0 . BEFORE ME/ the y=rigned authority, this day personally appeared 4i and on oath stated that the ILfacts herein.,..ove stated are true to the best of 7ity knowledge or belief. Sworn o andsubscribed to b fore me on this v2,0 day of , 19R . O /LAsoNOTARY PUBLIC ��SANDRA State of Texas otary Public in and for C COMM.Exp,02.0447 the State Jof Texas My Commission Expires: 6tYA_ k r 11/4,e,614_,1d_, d/ik fq i Type/Print Notary' s Name R ` r TEXAS BASEBALL CENTER Specific Use Permit (1A-94-89) South Kimball Avenue CONDITIONS No public address system No bleachers or stadium seating No sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages No camping Enhanced landscaping at northwest corner Field lighting: Lighting Plan, dated July 7, 1994 by Ed's Lighting Service Lights with directional hoods focusing light on fields No inning 10:00 1000 p.m. No lights during December and January No lights Monday-Thursday during September, October and November Phasing - Phase I: Southwestern field, indoor facility and 60 parking spaces Phase II: Southeastern field and additional 40 parking spaces Phase III: Remaining field and additional 20 parking spaces DA942630293 092094p1g1 I78D T3222-75000-TEXA I C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 16, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance 624-FY1994-95 Budget I During the budget work sessions with Council on August 17 and 18, the City Council reviewed the City Manager's proposed FY1994-95 Budget. There are two components to the Budget, the Operating Budget and the Capital Projects Budget. In past years, the Council has adopted an Operating Budget. Adjustments to the proposed General Fund budget include an additional allocation to GRACE in the City Secretary/Mayor/Council Division, adding $2,500 for a total of $7,500. A reduction in the travel and tuition line items within the Division offset the addition. A major program discussed with the Council is the Neighborhood Sewer program. The proposed budget included $750,000 as a capital outlay line item in the Utility Fund's Sewer Division to 0tI ,,, initiate this program. At the work sessions, the Council directed Staff to explore an expanded multiple year approach, prioritizing neighborhoods based on needs. Public Works Director Bob Whitehead developed a three year$4,370,500 proposal, with five neighborhoods listed in the first year at an estimated cost of$1,158,000. The Capital Projects Fund Summary proposes that $1.3 million certificates of obligation be sold to fund the first year of the assessment program. The All Funds Summary retains the $750,000 as a transfer from the Utility Fund to the Waterworks Improvement Fund. These funds can be used for other water and wastewater projects not eligible for funding through impact fees. At the August 16 Council meeting the Corridor Study contract was amended and increased by $15,000. These funds were not reflected in the FY1994-95 budget within Community Development. It is proposed that the funding included within Community Development for the Trails System Master Plan ($20,000) be instead allocated for this Corridor Study contract. The Trails System Master Plan is proposed to be funded through the Park Dedication Fee Fund. Operating Rndget The All Funds Summary reflects revenues of$14,485,420. Total Expenditures are proposed at $14,477,603. This is an increase of$271,310 over the budget presented at the work sessions. This increase is comprised of the $20,000 added to expenditures in the Park Dedication Fee Fund for the Trails System Master Plan. The balance of$251,310 is the operating transfer from the SPDC Operating Fund to the SPDC Debt Service Fund. This amount had been included in the SPDC Operating Fund summary, but was not reflected in the All Funds Summary. Curtis E. Hawk iikurime FY1994-95 Budget September 16, 1994 Page 2 I Capital Projects Budget. This budget is a compilation of projects funded through bond sales, impact fees, the 1/2 cent sales tax, perimeter road fees, operating fund transfers and other sources. It lists all major capital improvement projects by fund, grouped according to improvement type. There are water and wastewater projects, streets/drainage and parks projects. The budget proposes $8,343,689 in revenues and other sources of funds. Total Expenditures proposed are $11,629,951. An Infrastructure Reserve Fund is established through the transfer of $820,026 from the General Fund operating budget for street and drainage improvements. The Capital Projects budget also includes the Assessment Program. At the Council meeting September 6, the Council approved 6-0 the FY1994-95 budget and amended FY1993-94 budget on first reading of Ordinance 624. The September 20 meeting will be the final reading and public hearing on the budget. I LAH I I I I I I 7e-2 City of Southlake,Texas MONTHLY ADMINISTRATIVE CALENDARS AND DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ire August 1994 I C Building 4-A Community Development 4-B Complaints 4-C Finance 4-D Municipal Court 4-E Public Safety 4-F Public Works 4-G Street/Drainage 4-H Utility 4-I Park 4-J Chir C C C me we rim VII rall rii ow ow mu iir nu an mu no on rim ./ Iv rime AUGUST 30, 1994 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR AUGUST 1994 NUMBER OF THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL AUG94 JULY94 AUG. 1993 1-8 1994 1-8 1993 10/93-8/94 10/92-8/93 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 47 47 46 414 324 557 427 Alteration/Addn. 4 3 3 35 26 49 37 Accessory Bldg 1 3$ 2 21 19 33 20 Commercial-New 2 12 0 8 10 11 20 Commercial-Alt/Addn. 3 2 2 14 8 20 10 Swimming Pool 30 18 19 213 153 257 157 Mobil Home 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 127 96 89 883 649 1145 896 Plumbing 91 78 77 680 528 892 690 Heat/Air 57 52 51 452 352 608 471 Culvert 3 2 3 16 10 19 13 `� Demolition 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 NCERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential 60 52 55 487 463 643 617 COMMERCIAL 7 0 4 40 63 46 78 OTHER: Misc.Building 69 33 28 341 254 448 321 SIGNS 2 5 2 28 34 35 47 SCHOOLS 4 0 1 4 3 4 3 TENNIS COURTS 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 FENCE 6 2 1 12 7 17 7 CHURCH 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA 0 0 0 4 1 4 1 CITY BUILDING 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 TOTALS 515 394 384 3657 2910 4796 3841 4A2 we mu rue pm run ion IP= ran me owme we we rue t • CITY Or SOUTHLARE , PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR AUGUST 1994 AUGUST 30, 1994 FEES COLLECTED FOR THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL AUG94 JLY94 AUG 1993 1-8 1994 1-8 1993 10/93-08/94 10/92-08/93 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 60,412.00 62,542.00 54,469.00 531,886.00 • 402,620.00 712,057.00 526,160.00 Alteration/Addn. 1,156.00 764.00 423.00 7,419.00 5,238.00 11,370.00 8,200.00 Accessory Bldg. 216.00 52e.00 519.00 6,024.00 2,379.00 4,815.00 4,323.00 Commercial-New 17,967.00 870.00 320.00 40,427.00 8,899.00 45,994.00 12,340.00 Commercial-A1t/Addn 1,332.00 817.00 707.00 3,890.00 3,212.00 14,596.00 4,609.00 Swimming Pool 6,383.00 3,867.00 .00 45,329.00 35,331.00 55,434.00 41,482.00 Mobil Home 10.00 .00 4,406.00 10.00 .00 10.00 .00 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 13,405.56 10,612.21 9,613.26 95,067.47 69,088.83 125,800.30 91,516.63 Plumbing 9,224.25 8,521.50 8,448.00 75,460.50 59,323.50 101,832.00 77,839.75 Heat/Air 5,767.50 4,686.50 4,473.50 42,430.05 31,739.50 56,855.10 41,557.50 Culvert 90.00 60.00 160.00 510.00 550.00 600.00 745.00 Demolition .00 .00 .00 15.00 15.00 45.00 30.00 46CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Commercial 210.00 .00 30.00 1,110.00 1,110.00 1,290.00 1,530.00 OTHER: Misc.Building 1,710.00 798.00 675.00 8,345.10 6,195.00 10,943.10 7,827.00 SIGNS 140.00 549.00 224.00 1,745.00 2,388.00 2,044.00 3,144.00 SCHOOLS 1,258.00 .00 416.00 1,258.00 416.00 1,258.00 416.00 TENNIS COURT .00 .00 .00 .00 692.00 130.00 692.00 FENCE 531.00 1,196.00 119.00 3,293.00 578.00 3,840.00 578.00 CHURCH .00 .00 1,812.00 1,292.00 5,007.00 1,292.00 5,007.00 SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA .00 .00 .00 163.00 30.00 163.00 30.00 CITY BUILDINGS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTALS 119,812.31 95,811.21 88,107.76 862,674.12 634,811.83 1,150,368.50 828,026.88 4A3 PM IFIN rye roe am en on Eng ems ■es ma •, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR AUGUST 1994 AUGUST 30, 1994 THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR BUILDING VALUATION MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL FISCAL FOR PERMITS ISSUED AUG94 JLY94 AUG 93 1-8 1994 01-8 1993 10/92-08/94 10/92-08/93 BUILDING: • Res-Single Family 10,518,420.00 10,981,634.00 9,623,800.00 92,251,902.00 68,948,041.00 123,273,402.00 89,803,132.00 Alteration/Addn. 100,000.00 63,124.00 41,600.00 550,924.00 598,290.00 904,324.00 860,790.00 Accessory Bldg. 16,200.00 40,000.00 42,000.00 214,960.00 180,700.00 345,810.00 518,100.00 Commercial-New 4,540,000.00 75,000.00 .00 8,580,300.00 1,030,800.00 9,294,800.00 1,310,900.00 Commercial-A1t/Addn. 77,900.00 44,300.00 15,000.00 201,600.00 261,500.00 1,726,200.00 276,500.00 Mobil Home 40,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00 .00 40,000.00 40,000.00 Swimming Pool 490,500.00 296,230.00 351,200.00 3,022,735.00 2,810,300.00 4,016,465.00 3,309,600.0E SCHOOLS 135,000.00 .00 25,000.00 135 000.00 67,000.00 436,000.00 67,000.00 TENNIS COURTS .00 .00 .00 .00 69,000.00 8,500.00 69,000.00 N FENCE 20,680.00 136,600.00 5,000.00 261,800.00 32,900.00 297,780.00 32,900.00 ( ,_ CHURCH .00 .00 203,600.000 140,600.00 699,100.00 140,600.00 699,100.00 '- SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA .00 .00 . .00 6,300.00 1,000.00 6,300.00 1,000.00 CITY BUILDINGS .00 .00 .00 39,700.00 2,150.00 39,700.00 2,150.00 TOTALS 15,938,700.00 11,636,888.00. 10,334,200.00 105,935,801.00 74,700,781.00 140,529,881.00 96,950,172.00 TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 1845 1765 1574 13,623 11,560 18,463 15,830 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION Oct 1992 - Sept. 1993 OCT 1993 - AUGUST 1994 BUILDING INSPECTIONS: 1803 1714 1549 OCTOBER 156 $11,700.00 101 $ 7,575.00 CODE ENFORCEMENT: NOVEMBER 59 4,425.00 62 4,650.00 Investigations 42 51 25 DECEMBER 60 4,500.00 47 3,525.00 JANUARY 39 2,925.00 51 3,825.00 FEBRUARY 20 1,500.00 29 2,175.00 MARCH 32 2,400.00 61 4,575.00 APRIL 32 2,400.00 38 2850.00 MAY 36 2,700.00 29 2,175.00 JUNE 37 2,775.00 39 2,925.00 JULY 36 2,700.00 51 3,825.00 • AUGUST 30 2,250.00 54 4,050.00 SEPTEMBER 22 . 1,650.00 • TOTAL TO DATE 559 '$41,925.00 562 $42,150.00 4A4 • City of Southlake,Texas r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING 31 AUGUST 1994 ZONING $ 2,330.03 NO. OF CASES (8) PLATTING 7,180.00 NO. OF CASES (12) SPECIFIC USE PERMITS 343.56 NO. OF CASES (1) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 500.00 NO. OF CASES (5) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 338.40 NO. OF CASES (46) TOTAL REVENUE $ 10,691.99 TOTAL NO. OF RECEIPTS (72) C:\WPRREPORTS\REVNU-94.08 I GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended August 31, 1994 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended August 31, 1993 IC (fiscal month 11 -91.67%) Revised Percent Actual Percent I 1993-94 Year to Date Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 8/31/94 8/31/94 Expended 8/31/93 9/30/93 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $2,175,000 $17,623 $2,168,235 99.7% $2,118,765 $2,144,650 98.8% Sales Tax 865,000 94,158 743,407 85.9% 534,052 636,737 83.9% Franchise Fees 398,125 12,927 400,036 100.5% 294,623 305,909 96.3% Fines 232,400 29,872 213,920 92.0% 163,673 182,271 89.8% Charges for Services 63,545 1,807 50,001 78.7% 52,561 59,086 89.0% Permits/Fees 1,562,020 151,857 1,485,081 95.1% 1,134,840 1,251,287 90.7% Miscellaneous 36,175 1,818 28,886 79.9% 26,020 44,846 58.0% Transfer In-Other Funds 159,446 0 0 0.0% 0 159,446 0.0% Interest Income 90.000 7.925 93,629 104,0% 61,509 54 194 113.5% Total Revenues $5,581,711 $317,987 $5,183,195 92.9% $4,386,043 $4,838,426 90.7% I EXPENDITURES - - City Secretary $219,000 $24,076 $187,422 85.6% $125,433 $143,026 87.7% City Manager 193,025 22,336 179,909 93.2% 132,105 152,073 86.9% I Support Services 634,380 35,861 548,056 86.4% 408,879 502,644 81.3% Finance 256,090 25,891 236,434 92.3% 181,362 205,844 88.1% Municipal Court 167,183 17,982 140,915 84.3% 127,854 144,786 88.3% Fire 723,144 67,764 594,859 82.3% 491,795 566,832 86.8% Police 1,028,989 104,881 952,841 92.6% 788,810 895,343 88.1% Public Safety Support 440,210 66,054 389,332 88.4% 323,320 357,268 90.5% Building 259,491 30,223 239,600 92.3% 139,040 154,005 90.3% I Streets/Drainage 1,441,301 242,985 1,189,139 82.5% 686,956 857,494 80.1% Parks 226,522 13,295 180,894 79.9% 120,255 138,224 87.0% Public Works Administration 126,233 14,052 119,910 95.0% 58,115 102,064 56.9% ICommunity Development 293.312 27 777 233.648 79.7% 217.796 234,170 93.0% Total Expenditures $6,008,880 $693,177 $5,192,959 86.4% $3,801,720 $4,453,773 85.4% IExcess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($427,169) ($375,190) ($9,764) $584,323 $384,653 I OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Proceeds from C.O. Sale(net) $565.827 $565.827 $12 S0 IExcess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenditures $138.658 $556.063 $584.323 $384.653 IFUND BALANCE OCT 1 $1,405,310 $1,405,310 $1,125,708 $1,125,708 Net-Reserved for encumbrances 0 0 105,051 105,051 ENDING FUND BALANCE $1.543.968 $1.961 3_Z3. $1.604.980 $1.405.310 I 1 M IPIII Mill IMO 11111 = FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT YEAR-TO-DATE ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 TAXES 102.00 110.00 AD VALOREM/CURRENT 7,412.40- 2,004,226.60 101 1,990,000 14,226.60- 111.00 AD VALOREM/DELINQUENT 10,335.86 110,894.62 85 130,000 19,105.38 112.00 PENALTY & INTEREST 14,698.52 53,113.37 97 55,000 1,886.63 115.00 SALES TAX 94,157.70 743,406.90 86 865,000 121,593.10 121.00 FRANCHISE-GAS 66,884.32 100 67,000 115.68 122.00 FRANCHISE-TELEPHONE 12,926.97 45,329.26 105 43,275 2,054.26- 123.00 FRANCHISE-ELECTRIC 272,628.95 100 272,650 21.05 124.00 FRANCHISE-BANK 127.15 98 130 2.85 125.00 FRANCHISE-CABLE 15,067.48 100 15,070 2.52 100 TAXES 124,706.65 3,311,678.65 96 3,438,125 126,446.35 200. FINES 210.00 FINES & FORFEITURES 29,627.84 211,641.91 92 230,000 18,358.09 215.00 TEEN COURT REVENUES 244.00 2,278.00 95 2,400 122.00 200 FINES 29,871.84 213,919.91 92 232,400 18,480.09 300 •CHARGES FOR SERVICES 301.00 AMBULANCE 593.00 15,068.36 100 15,000 68.36- 302.00 DISPATCHING 303.00 MUTUAL AID 305.00 SPECIAL SERVICES PROGRAM 23,911.95 74 32,500 8,588.05 320.00 PARK/RECREATION FEES 125.00 225.00 225.00- 321.00 BUILDING RENTAL FEES 45.00 100 45 350.00 FIRE DEPT INCOME 5,000 5,000.00 370.00 RECREATION CLASS FEES 1,088.50 ' 10,750.65 98 11,000 249.35 300 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,806.50 50,000.96 79 63,545 13,544.04 400 PERMITS & FEES 410.00 PERMITS-RES NEW SINGLE FAM 59,493.80 708,866.20 83 854,000 145,133.80 410.01 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ALT/ADDN 1,156.00 12,369.43 12,369.43- 410.02 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ACS BLDGS 216.00 4,582.00 4,582.00- 410.03 PERMITS-BLDG COMMRCL NEW 19,225.00 48,544.00 48,544.00- 410.04 PERMITS-BLDG COMMERCIAL 1,332.00 14,855.80 14,855.80- 411.00 PERMITS-PLUMBING 8,834.75 100,009.54 91 109,800 9,790.46 412.00 PERMITS-ELECTRICAL 12,722.26 122,735.16 101 122,000 735.16- 413.00 PERMITS-HEAT & AIR 5,981.00 57,541.56 99 57,950 408.44 414.00 PERMITS-SPRINKLER 1,488.00 9,792.00 94 10,370 578.00 414.01 PERMITS-WATER WELL 150.00 720.00 720.00- 415.00 PERMITS-SITE PLAN 1,070.00 107 1,000 70.00- 416.00 PERMITS-CULVERT 90.00 630.00 90 700 70.00 416.01 PERMITS-APPROACH 90.00 306.00 306.00- 417.00 PERMITS-POOL 6,210.00 55,428.80 96 57,950 2,521.20 418.00 PERMITS-SIGN 100.00 2,194.00 63 3,500 1,306.00 419.00 PERMITS-HOUSE MOVING 40.00 40.00- 419.01 PERMITS-DEMOLITION 420.00 PERMITS-SOLICITORS 35.00 35 100 65.00 421.00 PERMITS-ALCOHOLIC USE 30.00 235.00 157 150 85.00- PM FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT YEAR-TO-DATE ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 422.00 PERMITS & FEES-MISC. 3,716.80 16,785.40 112 15,000 1,785.40- 423.00 FEES-ZONING 3,417.94 31,970.13 91 35,000 3,029.87 424.00 FEES-PLATTING 6,862.00 70,465.56 94 75,000 4,534.44 425.00, FEES-BOARD OF ADJ 100.00- 100.00 426.00 FEES-ZONING SPECIAL EXCEPT 427.00 ,FEES-STREET LIGHTS 8,287.92 12,360.40 275 4,500 7,860.40- 429.00 FEES-INSPECTION 4,163.50 109,035.10 99 110,000 964.90 429.50 FEES-ENGINEERING PLAN REV 4,240.12 61,335.10 94 65,000 3,664.90 430.00 FEES-SPECIAL USE ZONING 431.00 FEES-BUILDING 440.00 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION 4,050.00 43,275.00 108 40,000 3,275.00- 400 PERMITS & FEES 151,857.09 1,485,081.18 95 1,562,020 76,938.82 500 MISCELLANEOUS 502.00 PERIMETER RD FEE 510.00 MIS-INCOME 14,518.85 73 20,000 5,481.15 511.00 MIS-VITAL STATISTICS 309.00 112 275 34.00- 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 80.00 392.27 98 400 7.73 515.00 MIS-FEMA FUNDS 516.00 MIS-STREET LIGHTS 517.00 MIS-ZONING 518.00 MIS-BUILDING 519.00 MIS-POLICE DEPARTMENT 138.00 1,621.00 90 1,800 179.00 520.00 MIS-SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 530.00 MIS-TOWER LEASE 1,600.00 12,000.00 88 13,600 1,600.00 531.00 MISC-PUBLICATIONS 45.00 45 100 55.00 500 MISCELLANEOUS 1,818.00 28,886.12 80 36,175 7,288.88 700 OTHER REVENUES 713.00 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 159,446 159,446.00 714.00 DONATIONS v 725.00 BOND PROCEEDS 720,826.99 100 720,827 .01 ,726.00 LOAN PROCEEDS , 760.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 700 OTHER REVENUES 720,826.99 82 880,273 159,446.01 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 7,925.04 93,628.75 104 90,000 3,628.75- 900 INTEREST 7,925.04 93,628.75 104 90,000 3,628.75- 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 317,985.12 5,904,022.56 94 6,302,538 398,515.44 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 317,985.12 5,904,022.56 94 6,302,538 398,515.44 UPON PM FPO IWO IIIIII Mill 1111111 OM IPSO rill IMO 1111111 111111 IIIIII IMO Will ORM PPR I FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 155,000.00 .00 100 155,000 .00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 155,000.00 .00 100 155,000 .00 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 12,583.27 86,451.77 .00 86 100,600 14,148.23 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,250.00 23,646.44 .00 79 29,825 6,178.56 400 SUPPLIES 2,348.33 17,453.79 .00 90 19,500 2,046.21 500 OTHER EXPENSES 50.00 4,445.35 .00 56 8,000 3,554.65 600 AOMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 1,107.99 9,201.08 .00 83 11,100 1,898.92 700 MAINTENANCE .00 480.00 .00 100 480 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 361.14 25,065.24 .00 80 31,460 6,394.76 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,374.99 20,678.37 .00 115 18,035 2,643.37- DEPT 100 TOTAL ******** 24,075.72 187,422.04 .00 86 219,000 31,577.96 CITY SEC/MAYOR/COUNCIL 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 19,735.86 147,308.28 .00 92 160,570 13,261.72 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 2,592.50 .00 93 2,800 207.50 400 SUPPLIES 217.90 3,114.32 .00 125 2,500 614.32- 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 1,736.06 9,580.77 .00 113 8,500 1,080.77- 700 MAINTENANCE 81.72 627.41 .00 103 610 17.41- 1 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 564.00 13,946.06 .00 89 15,700 1,753.94 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 2,740.01 .00 117 2,345 395.01- DEPT 103 TOTAL ******** 22,335.54 179,909.35 .00 93 193,025 13,115.65 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 2,548.65 21,543.98 .00 89 24,240 2,696.02 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,185.34 192,001.76 .00 83 230,200 38,198.24 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 3,391.32 33,890.22 .00 86 39,230 5,339.78 400 SUPPLIES 1,462.87 7,120.04 .00 110 6,500 620.04- 500 OTHER EXPENSES 10,443.85 100,807.62 .00 92 110,060 9,252.38 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 393.01- 101,501.79 .00 101 100,800 701.79- 700 MAINTENANCE 5,172.03 43,208.90 .00 90 48,200 4,991.10 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 49.90 205.42 .00 137 150 55.42- 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 47,776.56 .00 64 75,000 27,223.44 DEPT 105 TOTAL ******** 35,860.95 548,056.29 .00 86 634,380 86,323.71 SUPPORT SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 19,260.95 153,418.33 .00 90 169,710 16,291.67 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,515.41 60,358.56 .00 99 61,175 816.44 400 SUPPLIES 316.98 6,370.77 .00 77 8,300 1,929.23 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 177.37 2,424.11 .00 91 2,650 225.89 700 MAINTENANCE .00 282.50 .00 94 300 17.50 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 380.00 6,398.04 .00 96 6,660 261.96 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 239.98 7,181.59 .00 98 7,295 113.41 DEPT 106 TOTAL 25,890.69 236,433.90 .00 92 256,090 19,656.10 FINANCE FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.674 ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 11,512.62 85,179.62 .00 90 94,145 8,965.38 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,587.30 46,737.68 .00 82 57,310 10,572.32 400 SUPPLIES 239.18 1,888.97 .00 63 3,000 1,111.03 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 203.07 3,204.60 .00 56 5,700 2,495.40 700 MAINTENANCE .00 384.00 .00 77 500 116.00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 440.00 3,322.24 .00 52 6,330 3,007.76 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 198.00 .00 100 198 .00 DEPT 107 TOTAL ******** 17,982.17 140,915.11 .00 84 167,183 26,267.89 COURT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 64,117.29 516,039.65 .00 94 551,667 35,627.35 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 1,000 1,000.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 53.00 376.03 .00 54 700 323.97 400 SUPPLIES 473.33 9,482.90 .00 81 11,700 2,217.10 500 OTHER EXPENSES 3.02 1,254.64 .00 84 1,500 245.36 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 493.40 .00 62 800 306.60 700 MAINTENANCE 2,054.96 22,640.05 .00 76 29,850 7,209.95 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,062.58 19,700.82 .00 71 27,727 8,026.18 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 24,871.90 .00 25 98,200 73,328.10 DEPT 131 TOTAL 67,764.18 594,859.39 .00 82 723,144 128,284.61 FIRE SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 97,449.69 795,692.49 .00 95 833,604 37,911.51 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95.00 2,570.46 .00 64 4,000 1,429.54 400 SUPPLIES 1,667.09 11,527.31 .00 78 14,850 3,322.69 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 102.17 .00 26 400 297.83 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 971.47 1,540.26 .00 77 2,000 459.74 700 MAINTENANCE 2,826.67 43,889.04 .00 68 65,000 21,110.96 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,871.25 21,684.71 .00 74 29,335 7,650.29 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 75,834.90 .00 95 79,800 3,965.10 DEPT 132 TOTAL ******** 104,881.17 952,841.34 .00 93 1,028,989 76,147.66 POLICE SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 41,024.13 313,094.04 .00 90 347,995 34,900.96 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 2,241.25 .00 86 2,600 358.75 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 354.24 3,896.64 .00 92 4,250 353.36 400 SUPPLIES 497.44 7,585.09 .00 82 9,300 1,714.91 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 178.92 .00 20 900 721.08 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 525.27 1,743.23 .00 76 2,300 556.77 700 MAINTENANCE 13,227.57 29,403.19 .00 75 39,000 9,596.81 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 479.77 7,789.83 .00 79 9,865 2,075.17 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 9,945.99 23,400.04 .00 98 24,000 599.96 DEPT 133 TOTAL ******** 66,054.41 389,332.23 .00 88 440,210 50,877.77 PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 27,811.94 180,240.84 .00 91 197,006 16,765.16 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 290.00 1,926.41 .00 76 2,525 598.59 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 241.22 4,501.17 .00 117 3,850 651.17- 500 OTHER EXPENSES 37.16 57.44 .00 57 100 42.56 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 199.11 1,734.03 .00 96 1,800 65.97 700 MAINTENANCE 274.82 2,504.44 .00 91 2,750 245.56 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,051.01 9,242.54 .00 90 10,275 1,032.46 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 318.05 39,393.40 .00 96 41,185 1,791.60 DEPT 142 TOTAL 30,223.31 239,600.27 .00 92 259,491 19,890.73 BUILDING 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 143 TOTAL .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 PLANNING& ZONING 000 CAPITAL OUTLAY 104,016.95 136,119.95 .00 91 150,000 13,880.05 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 38,137.04 285,249.42 .00 84 339,421 54,171.58 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,848.15 59,235.40 .00 83 71,300 12,064.60 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 1,981.18 8,618.25 .00 115 7,500 1,118.25- 400 SUPPLIES .00 84.25 .00 34 250 165.75 500 OTHER EXPENSES 3,287.33 27,962.93 .00 82 34,030 6,067.07 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 700 MAINTENANCE 23,646.28 135,175.19 .00 75 180,500 45,324.81 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 79.05 6,924.82 .00 87 8,000 1,075.18 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 63,988.60 529,768.85 .00 81 650,300 120,531.15 DEPT 144 TOTAL ******** 242,984.58 1,189,139.06 .00 83 1,441,301 252,161.94 STREETS 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 8,588.28 64,040.34 .00 88 72,660 8,619.66 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 596.50 17,756.52 .00 64 27,625 9,868.48 400 SUPPLIES 313.70 6,382.01 .00 83 7,685 1,302.99 500 OTHER EXPENSES 1,495.70 13,052.83 .00 76 17,071 4,018.17 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 560.73 4,579.92 .00 42 10,840 6,260.08 700 MAINTENANCE 227.07 19,336.80 .00 72 26,800 7,463.20 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 68.17 2,768.38 .00 88 3,141 372.62 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,444.68 52,976.74 .00 87 60,700 7,723.26 DEPT 145 TOTAL ******** 13,294.83 180,893.54 .00 80 226,522 45,628.46 PARKS AND RECREATION 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 12,252.79 98,683.50 .00 100 99,170 486.50 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 4 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 767.16 .00 19 4,063 3,295.84 400 SUPPLIES 15.88 1,271.17 .00 85 1,500 228.83 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 300 300.00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 25.70 304.30 .00 101 300 4.30- 700 MAINTENANCE .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,411.15 10,220.84 .00 97 10,500 279.16 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 346.45 8,663.04 .00 83 10,400 1,736.96 DEPT 146 TOTAL ******** 14,051.97 119,910.01 .00 95 126,233 6,322.99 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 22,170.10 159,761.95 .00 91 175,267 15,505.05 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,987.50 31,673.84 .00 43 74,525 42,851.16 400 SUPPLIES 244.52 2,664.68 .00 86 3,100 435.32 500 OTHER EXPENSES 12.50 3,822.13 .00 83 4,600 777.87 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 2,916.18 12,762.08 .00 100 12,700 62.08- 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 446.53 5,509.90 .00 76 7,270 1,760.10 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 17,453.52 .00 110 15,850 1,603.52- bEPT 150 TOTAL 27,777.33 233,648.10 .00 80 293,312 59,663.90 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND 100 TOTAL 693,176.85 5,347,960.63 .00 87 6,163,880 815,919.37 C E - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended August 31, 1994 and August 31, 1993 (fiscal month 11 -91.67%) Revised Percent Actual Percent 1993-94 Year to Date Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 8/31/94 8/31/94 Expended 8/31/93 9/30/93 Expended Water Sales-residential $2,700,000 $397,401 $2,283,136 84.6% $1,946,099 $2,294,377 84.8% Water Sales-commercial 510,000 44,218 415,526 81.5% 368,017 438,097 84.0% Sewer Sales 360,000 38,916 331,735 92.1% 208,525 237,213 87.9% Sanitation Sales 335,000 29,025 309,577 92.4% 268,466 296,252 90.6% Other utility charges 337,500 38,872 334,526 99.1% 283,609 297,391 95.4% Miscellaneous 56,600 141 54,110 95.6% 55,276 75,380 73.3% Interest Income 65.000 7,927 05.916 101.4% 30.811 30.118 102.3% Total Revenues $4,364,100 $556,500 $3,794,526 86.9% $3,160,803 $3,668,828 86.2% CEXPENSES Water $2,478,425 $239,856 $1,603,211 64.7% $1,221,417 $1,879,712 65.0% Sewer 688,921 159,795 651,400 94.6% 395,265 428,582 92.2% Sanitation 304,500 25,758 251,807 82.7% 215,537 263,050 81.9% Debt Service- ERevenue Bonds 81,895 0 81,901 100.0% 79,719 79,719 100.0% Other-Line Oversizing 25,000 0 19,713 78.9% 3,072 24,072 0.0% Transfers-other funds 269,613 0 110.167 40.9% 107 849 267.295 40.3% I Total Expenses $3,848,354 $425,409 $2,718,199 70.6% $2,022,859 $2,942,430 68.7% il Net Income/(Loss) $515.746 $131.091 $1.076.327 $1.137.944 $726.398 1 I! 11 . C CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Ill UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST 1994 C THIS MONTH II THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR 8/31/94 7/31/94 8/31/93 ACCOUNTS BILLED: WATER $458,439.98 $389,331.34 $481,920.84 SEWER 39,138.92 37,639.21 28,691.64 GARBAGE 29,083.89 28,813.97 26,026.99 SALES TAX 2,247.52 2,225.33 1,878.84 IIOTHER 3,395.00 2.291.22 3,942.74 TOTAL $532,305.31 $460,301.07 $542,461.05 NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS: WATER 3,783 3,714 3,142 SEWER 1,478 1,440 997 11 GARBAGE 3,500 3,459 3,131 C TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED: 4,017 3,950 3,382 IENEW CUSTOMERS: (increases for the month) C WATER 67 81 48 SEWER 38 59 55 *GARBAGE 41 79 46 CTOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED 67 78 48 BCONSUMPTION BILLED (IN 000'S): WATER 111,581 95,129 130,700 CSEWER 56,221 45,177 50,518 *Beginning 6/94,all builder accounts will not be charged garbage. They are unable to utilize service while homes are under construction,because most solid waste is building materials. Once home is occupied by homeowner,garbage will be charged. C FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT YEAR-TO-DATE ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 400 PERMITS & FEES 429.00 FEES-INSPECTION 400 PERMITS & FEES 500 MISCELLANEOUS 510.00 MIS-INCOME 60.80 527.80 53 1,000 472.20 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 53,189.56 97 55,000 1,810.44 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 80.00 392.65 65 600 207.35 500 MISCELLANEOUS 140.80 54,110.01 96 56,600 2,489.99 600 UTILITY CHARGES 611.00 WATER SALES-RESIDENTIAL 397,400.59 2,283,135.77 85 2,700,000 416,864.23 612.00 WATER SALES-COMMERICAL 44,217.68 415,525.92 81 510,000 94,474.08 613.00 WATER TAP 23,570.00 217,769.00 101 216,000 1,769.00- , 614.00' BULK WATER 5,248.62 36,025.97 103 35,000 1,025.97- 651.00 SEWER SALES 38,916.25 331,735.49 92 360,000 28,264.51 652.00 *SEWER TAP 4,300.00 39,416.00 88 45,000 5,584.00 670.00 GARBAGE SALES 29,025.30 309,576.92 92 335,000 25,423.08 670.50 RECYCLING RECOVERY 682.00 METER BOX 691.00 METER TEST 692.00 UNAPPLIED CASH 693.00 SERVICE CHARGE 2,190.00 20,011.00 100 20,000 11.00- 694.00 LATE CHARGES 3,443.57 20,219.52 101 20,000 219.52- 695.00 DELINQENT ACCT COLLECTIONS 696.00 RECONNECT FEE 120.00 1,085.00 72 1,500 415.00 600 UTILITY CHARGES 548,432.01 3,674,500.59 87 4,242,500 567,999.41 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 807.00 TRANSFER IN-WW/IMPROVE 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 7,927.01 65,915.85 101 65,000 915.85- 900 INTEREST 7,927.01 65,915.85 101 65,000 915.85- 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 556,499.82 3,794,526.45 87 4,364,100 569,573.55 TOTAL WATER FUND 556,499.82 3,794,526.45 87 4,364,100 569,573.55 FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 9/15/94 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 8/31/94 PAGE 5 FISCAL MONTH 11 91.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 211,780.45 .00 56 376,508 164,727.55 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 211,780.45 .00 56 376,508 164,727.55 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 44,772.26 354,576.97 .00 92 386,321 31,744.03 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,160.00 43,612.50 .00 84 52,363 8,550.50 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 849.64 .00 57 1,500 650.36 400 SUPPLIES 418.96 2,954.70 .00 92 3,220 265.30 500 OTHER EXPENSES 156,755.71 847,784.83 .00 54 1,573,446 725,661.17 * 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 1,968.89 16,501.05 .00 91 18,200 1,698.95 700 MAINTENANCE 11,673.09 100,054.35 .00 95 105,600 5,545.65 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 867.58 8,832.51 .00 100 8,875 42.49 . 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 22,239.52 227,844.11 .00 69 328,900 101,055.89 DEPT 147 TOTAL ******** 239,856.01 1,603,210.66 .00 65 2,478,425 875,214.34 WATER 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 5,765.02 46,566.96 .00 86 53,911 7,344.04 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 4,905.00 .00 49 10,000 5,095.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 1,871.00 .00 89 2,100 229.00 400 SUPPLIES .00 600.75 .00 29 2,100 1,499.25 500 OTHER EXPENSES 3,235.87 20,234.80 .00 90 22,600 2,365.20 700 MAINTENANCE 150,794.07 573,132.59 .00 98 583,200 10,067.41 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 904.34 .00 60 1,510 605.66 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 3,185.00 .00 24 13,500 10,315.00 DEPT 148 TOTAL 159,794.96 651,400.44 .00 95 688,921 37,520.56 SEWER 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,758.31 251,807.47 .00 83 304,500 52,692.53 DEPT 149 TOTAL ******** 25,758.31 251,807.47 .00 83 304,500 52,692.53 SANITATION FUND 200 TOTAL 425,409.28 2,718,199.02 .00 71 3,848,354 1,130,154.98 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SALES TAX REVENUES six year comparison revised 1993-94 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $865.000 $802.387 $62.613 7.24°/Q I AI •'1 IS AI ' FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL` FISOAL Y AI YEAR.' %Inc YEAR':':; %Inc YEAR::` %Inc ----YEAR %Inc YEAR:> %Inc I MONTH :88189'' •`•_$9190 (Dec) 90/91 > (Dec) 91/92 (Dec) <'92/93 (Dec) 93/9 '_ (Dec) October $Z 97{ $37 : 6 35.1% -:$44 081: 16.7% •$46;731: 6.0% ;:;$50 956 9.0% :.;.$99,408 95.1% 1 0 0 0 0 0 November 59.3/o '>:: ::>':>>< 51.0% -24.8/o 50.8/o . : " 20.2/o ><;1�x428: ;>::;> 4� �2 3"117 <27929: :�2�1:Lf< �Q,�2� 0 0 0 0 0 December18.1/0 5.2/0 • 16.9/0 1.7/o > . 107.3/o 17;$�t3;<<: I;t��2'� 2$,464 3 33;2�3: 3�>�St} 7b,15S 0 0 0 0 0 /o _:>:<'.::; :: � 7/o :: -15.1/o :;..;: : ;:..; 69.2/o <.# 57.3/o January ��"#��:;: :;:34�4t 28.8 ,471�6 36. '40;�'12 0 0 0 0 0 - /o- 47.0 78.4/0 1.9/0 February `:<:>I>5>59� ::>25 5... 22 487 �0,106 <393SI March l4;77$: :3(3; 57 107.5% :•.32;955 7.5% _:::.37,4$8 13.8% '`44176' 17.8% 59,378 34.4% 0 0 0 0 ° April >:;:48635 :::3724 1'' -23.5/o 4I r445 11.4/o -<57543' 38.8/0 68664 19.3/o _>..$7;43$ 27.3/o • May 27y$24;•.:31;50'1 : 13.2% 36 627' 16.3% >41;020. 12.0% `54;623- 33.2% $8291 6.7% June 24;051 `:':..37 447 55.7% •:37;$94: 1.2% :: 43 105 13.8% ••:;52;027. 20.7% 59 77 14.5% IJuly ;'>3$63(3 51;374 33.0% 47;017 -8.5% 51;357: 9.2% . 80;567 56.9% 94,157 16.9% August ._22;699;:>.•:31;969: 40.8% 35 951 12.5% .48;731 35.5% : 48,290 -0.9% : .$8980 22.1% ISeptember •• 31204 `J2 499 4.2% - 37.004 13.9% 42,741: 15.5% 54.395 27.3% I TOTAL $311699 :$396;106 27.1% $448,148 13.1% $510,036 13.8% $636,738. 24.8% $802,387 37.8% I sl.S AX94.wlc3 REPORT DATE 09/09/94 I ` First month of 12 cent additional sales tax. I C C C C CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SALES TAX REVENUES 1993-94 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $160.000 $135.502 $24.498 15.31% FISCAL YEAR MONTH 93/94 October $0 November 0 December 0 January 0 February - 0 March 0 April 0 May 29,145 June 29,788 July 47,079 August 29,490 September 0 TOTAL $135,502 SLSfAX94.WK3 09/09/94 I C C C we smug FPI IMMO OMNI we MO MI MI rue OMNI MO MR PM OMNI POI MONO roe rPe State of Texas Page: 32 Comptroller of Public Accounts City Sales and Use Tax Comparison Summary - September 1994 County/City Current Net Payment Comparable Payment % Change 1994 Payments 1993 Payments % Change Rate This Period Prior Year To Date To Date Tarrant Arlington 1.500% $ 3,598,374.78 $ 3, 183,951.55 13.01% $ 35,584,451.09 $ 32,280,144.74 10.23% Bedford 1.000% $ 208,083.44 $ 205,834.88 1.19% $ 2,488,900.91 $ 2,431,994.83 2.33% Benbrook 1.000% $ 47,128. 16 $ 44, 109.27 6.84% $ 609,750.88 $ 561,029.47 8.68% Blue Mound 1.000% $ 2,000.13 $ 2,324.00 -13.93% $ 32,971.70 $ 27,478.41 19.99% Colleyville 1.000% $ 78,026.35 $ 64, 159.06 21.81% $ 794,772.49 $ 648,887.78 22.48% Crowley g 1.000% $ 13,692.35 $ 10,611.30 29.03% $ 168,904.04 $ 157,372.83 7.32% EdglecliffnVillagens 1.000% $ 15,044.04 $ 21,058.86 -12.02% $ 247,317.85 $ 208,867.89 10.11% Euless * 1.500% $ 331,512. 12 $ 256,727.57 29.12% $ 3,286,935.66 $ 2, 144,745.88 53.25% Everman 1.000% $ 8,168. 10 $ 6,551.15 24.68% $ 94,805.85 $ 92, 169.83 2.84% Forest Hill 1.000% $ 41,183.27 44,808.00 -8.08% $ 461,118.65 $ 430,049.02 7.22% Fort Worth 1.000% $ 3,480,453.32 2,852,423.14 21.31% $ 36,231, 169.78 32,841,834. 19 10.32% Grand Prairie 1.500% 903,969.75 869,145.61 4.00% $ 9,885,028.57 i 7,671,727.04 28.85% Grapevine 1.000% 319,626.28 249,025.84 28.35% $ 3,318,690.29 2,915,824.53 13.81% Haltom City 1.000% 210,743.56 207, 157.01 1.73% $ 2,087,298.74 $ 2,052,045.95 1.71% Haslet 1.000% 1,339.37 $ 996.78 34.38% $ 18,358.95 $ 9,429.96 73.47% Hurst * 1.500% 490,254.65 $ 430,777.41 13.80% $ 5,946, 158.95 $ 4,080,610.68 45.71% Keller 1.500% $ 67,527.62 $ 66,822.11 1.05% $ 785, 195.73 $ 614,034.61 27.87% Kennedale 1.500% $$ 28,915. 14 $ 22,702.17 -11.20% $ 644,755.03 $ 274,398.82 15.09% Lake Worth 1.000% 57, Lakeside 1.000% $ 2,109.76 $ 1,423.48 48.21% $ 19,790.39 $ 17,421.40 13.59% Mansfield 1.500% $ 141,793.22 S 108,298.40 30.92% $ 1,403,050.43 $ 1,338,288.38 4.83% No Richland Hills 1.500% $ 700,848.71 $ 500,798.96 39.90% $ 6,563, 149.69 $ 5,069,899.72 29.45% Pantego * 1.500% $ 88,484.52 $ 70,445.36 25.80% $ 862,688.69 $ 608,417.67 41.79% Pelican Bay 1.000% $ 0.00 $ 0.00 U/C 2, 155.94 $ 1,362.57 58.22% Richland Hills 1.000% $ 92,365.96 $ 82,480.60 11.98% $ 875,200.88 $ 812,755.25 7.68% River Oaks 1.000% $ 13,432.03 $ 11,952.28 12.38% $ 163,613.51 $ 152,730.46 7. 12% Saginaw 1.000% $ 41,520.58 $ 47, 192.68 -12.01% $ 450,047.49 $ 387,498.86 18. 14% Sansom Park 1.000% $ 5,811.76 $ 6,936.57 -16.21% $ 80,027.89 $ 84,207.25 -4.96% Southlake * 1.500% $ 88,470.48 48,290. 13 83.20% $ 787,858.87 $ 489,280.10 61.03% Watauga 1.000% $ 39,088.99 $ 38,449.98 1.66% $ 539,534.20 $ 475,807.69 13.39% Westlake 1.000% $ 11,441.40 $ 3,549.73 222.31% $ 117,559.39 $ 68,930. 19 75.84% Westworth Village 1.000% $ 4,827.53 $ 5,285. 10 -8.65% $ 47,843.75 $ 37,646.78 27.08% White Settlement * 1.500% $ 198,901.78 $ 136,374. 15 45.85% $ 1,477,581.60 $ 1,333, 178.45 10.83% County Total $ 11,320,8b9.03 $ 9,558, 13b.5U 17.09% $ 115,371,845.91 $ 100,821,235.54 15.30% Taylor Abilene 2.000% $ 1,348,517.46 $ 1,291,661. 12 4.40% $ 14,384,219.70 $ 13,718,516.19 4.85% Buffalo Gap 1.000% $ 1,016.30 $ 922.95 10. 11% $ 10, 118.05 $ 9,054.79 11.72% Impact 1.000% $ 0.00 $ 0.00 U/C $ 735.88 $ 1,443.44 -49.01% Merkel 1.000% $ 3,620.85 $ 4,562.58 -20.84% $ 55,975.39 $ 58,821.22 --4.51% Trent 1.000% $ 0.00 $ 0.00 U/C $ 2,614.99 $ 2,321.82 12.62% Tuscola 1.000% $ 737.01 $ 1,386.98 -48.86% $ 9,424.45 $ 10,585.94 -10.97% Tye 1.000% $ 7,286.55 $ 5,513.24 32. 18% $ 64,527.11 $ 46,850.70 37.72% County Total $ 1,3U1,178.1Y $ 1,304,045.81 4.38% $ 14,532,214.27 $ 13,852,148.0g 4.80% Terry Brownfield 1.500% $ 81,245.91 $ 48,901.39 4.79% $ 515,608.69 514,258.29 0.28% Meadow 1.000% $ 0.00 $ 0.00 U/C $ 1,932.10 $ 1,835.99 5.23% , County Total $ 51,245.81 $ 48,901.39 4.79% $ 517,540.7g $ 510,094.411 0.28% U/C Unable to compute percentage change * Refer to the Local Sales Tax Rate Information Report MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT lEAUGUST 1994 TRAFFIC NON TRAFFIC II Non State City Parking Parking Law Ordinance Total li 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 897 6 25 5 933 II2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 0 0 0 II B. Payments of Fine 248 3 13 4 268 C. Cases Dismissed 158 0 7 0 165 , 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL:II A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 II B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 0 0 0 11 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 121 0 0 0 121 B. After Deferred Adjudication 114 0 1 0 115 C. After Proof of Insurance 108 0 0 0 108 11 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 0 0 0 II 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 13 0 12 0 25 II IITOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $30,226.84 STATE 18,465.00 TOTAL 48,691.84 II II II L C PI: MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT JULY/AUGUST 1994 COMPARISON F JULY AUGUST r01rII li 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 704 933 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: II A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 164 268 C. Cases Dismissed 83 165 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge II (1) Finding of Guilty 3 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 B. Trial by Jury 11 (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 II 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 90 121 B. After Deferred Adjudication 94 115 C. After Proof of Insurance 61 108 ilk' 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 II6. WARRANTS ISSUED 7 25 II II TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $14,977.75 $30,226.84 -Ir • STATE 9,795.00 18,465.00 TOTAL 24,772.75 48,691.84 II I I I! IL I: 1/41-01 m "Tr" 1m 11" um' MO �MII RAT . cRIANDIRII WO MO SUM WOO 01111 ( II Omi PUBLIC SAFETY . MONTH: August, 1994 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .: EST ' PRASE ,, : :; % START/END COMPLETED REMARKS 1 . Insert EMS Daga Into Sept /Oct 10% Coordinator Black handling. Computer Program Program loaded. 2 . Conduct EMT School Aluly /Sept 80% Coordinator Black handling. Into sixth week of eight . 3 . Develop Instructors April/April 10% Coordinator Ricky Black Packet working on development . 4 4 . Employee Background-Comm June /Aug 40% In process. 5 . Wrecker Contract Oct93/Aug94 95% PRF submitted. 6 . Complete Interim G.O. Feb /Sept 80% Rough drafted. Awaiting Manual action by Dir. Campbell 7 . Alarm Ordinance Jan /Aug 0% In development for review by Dir. Campbell before submit- sting to attorney. 8 . Purchase Order/PRF System Jan /May 0% Need to discuss w/Dir. Campbell 9 . Solicitor Ordinance Jan /Aug 0% In development for review by Dir. Campbell before submitting to attorney. 10 .Employee Evaluations Jan /Aug 0% In development for review by Dir. Campbell before submitting to attorney. 11.Emergency Management May92/Dec94 90% David Windrow updating plan. Working on annexes with Dir. Williams roe rtmer.rwe !MO IMO PM roe M NINIWR PIN AWN ANI NMI SOO fre !M PUBLIC SAFETY MONTH: August, 1994 PROJECT. DESCRIPTION EST... PHASE START/END ;?>:>:. . COMPLETED REMARKS 12 .Emergency Plan for City Oct93/Jan94 75% Dir. Williams handling. Hall Waiting on approval . 13 . Purchase New Ambulance Oct93/Nov94 25% Being built by Emergency One - Waiting on chassis from Ford 14 .Establish Commercial Oct93/Jan95 25% Plan to start in 1995 . Inspection Program 15 .Computer Networking Oct /Oct Final 98% Lt. Gregg handling licensing & final network connections 16 .Reports & Records System Oct /Oct 90% Beginning digitization part of computer networking and reorganization 17 . Installation of second Oct /Jan Begin 5% Lt . Gregg handling 450 Repeater 18 .Employee Background-Fire June /Aug 10% In process Reserve 19 .Emergency Management Plan / 10 % Director Campbell and Command Staff handling 20 .Complete TCLEOSE Contract Sept /Oct 30 % Coordinator Black handling. 21 .Revision of MIR Process Jan /Feb 75 % Waiting on policy. Class 22 . Insert all data in Jan /March 80 % Coord. Black handling. training records program ' Entered names & current training 23 . % . e""e" "II "la .111 MI1fR :. G N PUBLIC SAFETY MONTH: August 1994 PROJECT DESCRIPTION EST PHASE:` : st START/END COMPLETED REMARKS SPECIAL PROJECTS / 25 .Fire Prevention/Crime Oct93/ Prevention/9-1-1 Trailer 26 . / 27 . / 28 . / 29 . / 30 . / 31 . Nk� 32 . / 1 33 . / va 34 . / 35 . / 36 . / 37 . / 38 . / 39 . 40 . / 41 . / 42 . / 43 . / 44 . / 45 . / SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT r August, 1994 y err•' POLICE SERVICES Citations Issued 933 Residential Burglaries 2 Arrests 38 Business Burglaries 2 Traffic Accidents 22 Vehicle Burglaries 0 Alarm Calls 159 Assaults 5 Animal Calls 59 New CID cases assigned 32 * Thefts Under $750 12 CID Investigations Cleared 48 * IThefts $750 and up 4 Active CID Investigations 30 * FIRE SERVICES Residential Fires 2 Ambulance Calls : Commercial Fires 0 Vehicle Accidents 9 Other Building Fires 0 Non-accident EMS 22 fir' Vehicle Fires 0 Total Patients Transported 17 Grass Fires 5 Grass/Weed Complaints 12 Fire Alarms - False 13 Burn Permits Issued 2 Fuel Spills/Leak 7 Pre-fire Inspections 19 Other Haz-Mat Calls 0 Building Plans Reviewed 28 IIBomb Threats 1 Other Fire Calls 42 ISUPPORT SERVICES Total Police Service Calls 1763 Total Training Hours : IITotal Fire Service Calls 65 Police 160 Crime Prevention Surveys 8 Fire 44 ITotal DARE Classes Taught 0 Communications 72 Warrants Received!"10, 25 Volunteers 0 Warrants Cleared 13 Total Personnel Trained 28 Total Warrant Collections $2 , 736 . 50 9-1-1 Hang-up Investigations 10 *CID numbers for Det . Sessions only. Det . Ward' s numbers were not available . //4-.-"X rpm eurrupi we u i caRIP o Irtic -11Po rim mil rig ell rim PLANS READY PERMISSION PROJECTED TtJ:> DATE DATE COMPLETION PERCENT<`*:' PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADVTG/ORDERED AWARDED?. START DATE'' COMPLETED 1 . Heavy Equipment 12/21/93 01/18/94 01/19/94 varies 1-3 80% months 2 . Kimball Traffic Signals ' 09/06/94 plans to 3 . Continental Park Drainage 01/15/94 Council 06/30/94 08/30/94 4 . Water Improvements 12/07/93 01/07/94 02/01/94 06/01/94 100% (S.Peytonville to Continental) B11-M1k 5 . Water Improvements (Pump Station) 12/07/93 01/07/94 02/01/94 06/01/94 95% 6 . Water Improvements (Pump) 12/07/93 10/19/93 11/01/93 04/01/94 100% .k 7 . S-2 Sewer Line 07/20/93 07/26/93 9/94 100% Aledo 8 . Street Bond, Phase II 08/17/93 06-16-94 Carroll Ave. (SH 114 to Dove Ck) JL Bertram 9 . Summerplace Ln. Reconstruction 93/94 budget 08/16/94 10 . Summerplace Ln. Drainage 01/15/94 In-House 06/30/94 08/30/94 11 . Water Improvements, Ph. III 02/02/93 04/06/93 04/26/93 07/15/93 100% (White Chapel) 12 . Water Improvements, Ph. II 10/01/93 01/18/94 02/01/94 07/30/94 100% (High Pressure Plane) H & W 13 . South Peytonville 08/17/93 QCof9J94) 08/01/94 09/30/94 14 . S. Kimball Road Improvements 11/16/93 03/01/94 04/20/94 Sunmount 15 .Shady Oaks Water Line (CISD) 09/06/94 1 PLANS,;REL DATE... . PERMISSION PROJECTED TO DATE DATE COMPLETION PERCENT * START DATE COMPLETED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADVTG/ORDERED AWARDED 16 .N. Kimball Ext . (FM 1709-SH114) 06/15/94 09/06/94 01/15/95 JL Bertram 17 . Water System Improvements (SH 05/15/94 07/05/94 07/25/94 09/15/94 114-Kimball vicinity) 18 . Sanitary Lift Station & Force 06/15/94 09/06/94 Main (SH 114 and Kimball kd. vicinity) 19 . Sanitary Lift Station & Force RWW4 a O5/ 4 24r o 9c94 Pn7z/A 94 Main (SH 114 and FM 1709 and Wall St . vicinity) 20 . Westpark Water Change Order 03/01/94 04/20/94 05/05/94 100% 21. White Chapel from Bear Creek 04/05/94 Engr. contract to SH 114 04/os 22 . Dove Rd from White Chapel to 04/05/94 Engr. contract Kimball 04/05 * Percentages based upon payment estimates. WPFILES\PROJECTS.1 2 ow pm on on iroPqk sio ma on res mu on poi rera we SUBDIVISION AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS SUBDIVISION LOCATION NO.OF NO.OF DEVELOPER/ P&Z SIGNED DEV. PERCENT DATE NAME LOTS ACRES ENGINEER ACTION AGREEMENT COMPLETED ACCEPTED Adams Add. E.Continental&S.White Chapel 7 8.73 Warren Hagen Consultants Approved 1-3-94 95% Carroll Oaks Shop Cntr SH 114&N.Carroll N/A N/A Carter&Burgess N/A N/A 100% 5-1-94 Commerce Business Park MarketLoop ~ 13 6.5 Approved Pending Country Walk Add. W.Continental 61 43.2 Continental Jnt Venture Approved Pending 0% Dalton Sewer S.Carroll N/A N/A E.L.Dalton N/A 1-27-94 100% 4-7-94 Dominion Add. E.Continental 55 39 JMB Development Approved 11-29-93 99% Hillcrest Estates S.Carroll 123 75.8 Papagolos Dev, Approved Pending 0% Lake Crest Add. W.Southlake Blvd. 51 33 G Development Approved 7-26-93 99% Lonesome Dove N.Carroll At Burney 150 82.4 Tom Matthews Approved_ 9-14-94 0% Monticello III W.Southlake Blvd 27 39 Hills of Monticello Approved 2-10-94 95% Myers Meadows W.Southlake Blvd. 272 143 Joyce/Myers Approved 6-15-93 100% 8-20-93 Oakwood Ph II Eon Bob Jones Rd. 15 20.21 Tim Fleet Approved 10-6-93 100% ^ Pheasant Lakes Addn. Randol Mill 9 17.64 Warren Hagen Approved Pending 0% v Princeton Park S.White Chapel 73 45 Sunnybrook Farms Approved 12-13-93 99% 1 Remax W.Southlake Blvd 1 N/A J.Levitt Approve N/A 100% 4-12-94 ( "U Southlake Hills Fast N.of W.Continental 18 11.455 Conn—Anderson Approved 0 21/94 0% Southlake Mk Pl.Albertson W.Southlake Blvd @ Davis 5 10.6 Southlake Jnt.Venture Approved 3-2-94 site work 70% Wal—Mart Kimball Ave. 53 31.06 Adams Engr. Approved pending Southridge Lakes VII N.Peytonville 30 20.41 Atvida Approved 3-17-94 90% Stanhope Add E.Highland 14 15 David Hardy Approved 2-3-94 100% Stone Lakes III W.Southlake Blvd. 80 37.09 Phil Jobe Approved 2-8-94 95% Timarron Club House E.Continental 1 12.61 Mobil Land Dev Approved N/A 99% Timarron III E.Continental 290 303 Mobil Land Dev. Approved 5/16/94 99% Timarron Ph IV E.Continental N/A N/A Mobil Land Dev. Approved Pending 0% Timber Lake III—IV W.Southlake Blvd. 72 34.8 Continental JV Approved 4/25/94 100% Total 1,420 1029.51 123\Subdiv.wk2 August 1994 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM(15.: September 12, 1994 TO: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Brad Payton, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Monthly Report for Street Department August, 1994. C Description July Aug 1 . Tons of asphalt used a. Hot Mix Asphalt 12 77 c. Cold Mix Asphalt 750 300 d. Base Material 400 300 2 . Lane Miles of Road Repaired 100 100 3 . Number of Street Signs Repaired or Replaced (all types) 63 48 4 . Feet of Ditch Line Cleaned and shaped 500 1500 5 . Number of Vehicles Repaired 2 1 a. Dump truck repair transmission and replace clutch 6 . Row mowed in miles of streets 92 92 BP/cbk i/7/ I r CUTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH August, 1994 Irbe July Aug GALLONS PUMPED FROM WELLS 0 0 PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 107,498,000 134,566,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 107,498, 000 134,566,000 II WATER METERS SET 45 63 NEW WATER TAPS MADE 4 5 VALVES REPAIRED 13 3 VALVES TESTED 31 36 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 3 1 FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED 1 5 FIRE HYDRANTS FLUSHED 23 28 CDEAD END WATER MAINS FLUSHED 7 1 WATER MAINS REPAIRED 1 0 WATER METERS AND SERVICE LINE REPAIRED 6 8 LOCKED METER FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENT -0- 9 ilh' PULLED METERS 1 0 METERS REPLACED 3 0 IMISCELANEOUS WORK ORDERS 214 267 SEWER LIFT STATIONS CHECKED (4 L.S. ) 80 92 REQUIRED MONTHLY SEWAGE TESTS 10 8 I SEWER PLANT MAINTENANCE (BANK & DOVE) 40 46 SEWER MANHOLES INSPECTED 1 4 IMISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 0 0 Put the new high pressue plan and the Florence overhead storage tank into service on August 30, 1994 . WATER SUPERINTENDENT %be _63.diaiti IDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS rwerrow pm wemg inass r ® we MONT REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION SEPTEMBER, 1994 REV•ISION:.. STARTIhND : .::`: >::COMPL ETE REMARKS.-: POLICX.:A•Nb:.PROCEDURE DEVELOPMNT1........ :;...:;:<: : •, ::.;:::.:;;:.:::.:;::.;:.;;::.;:: •1. Facilities Usage Agreement 2/25-9/15 75% Awaiting final input from baseball association; made changes according to input from lawyer and meeting with youth association representatives; needs minor changes; will meet with baseball and soccer associations to implement for Fall seasons 2. Procedure for scheduling of soccer practice fields on joint 8/1-9/15 50% Contacted by CISD and asked to schedule soccer use and city sites practice fields; Received list of available sites; ISD admin. notified principals; Contacted M.S. principal • and Coach Ledbetter to confirm sites and hours of usability; notification to soccer coaches of procedure on Sept. 6; Following procedure as submitted to Park Board 3. Athletic Field Scheduling Procedure 8/1-9/15 90% Constructed proposal for Field Reservation Procedures; Submitted at Aug. Park Board meeting - tabled; Awaiting Park Board recommendation; 4. Park Maintenance Work Order Submittal 7/20-9/15 100% Printed work order forms to be submitted to Park Maintenance; For use by other departments and by associations utilizing city park facilities; will be included in Facilities Usage Agreement; Used to track projects RECREATION.PROGRAMS.;: :.................... ........... M > ;• ::::::::. K • 1. Fall Recreational Programs 8/26-11/15 25% Contracted instructors for tennis leagues and clinic, preschool programs, art classes, CPR classes, teen activities; continuing karate; began Adult Softball league(8 teams in 35 and over league); concluding Teen Leadership course; Developed and distributed Fall brochure to all Southlake residents; submitted news releases; contacted people from interest survey input; scheduled facility locations; need larger facility for Karate (growing participation)-contact schools 2. Locating possible instructors for additional programs ongoing Contacted TCJC continuing education director; sending proposal/request WM worm! ma NNE IMO ME 111611--1111111 1 0% Meeting with "Friday Night Live" group t 3. Targeting programs for teens program; Attended NE Youth Task Force meeting; Meet with Youth Advisory Board in Sept.; Developing ' training for in-line hockey referees; begin in-line hockey league in April 4. Adult Exercise programs June/April 10% Attempted to contract with "Jazzercise"; Could not arrange facilities through CISD; required minimum of two nights per week continuous; continue negotiations and locate facility; plan Spring to begin classes . „„ „ . ....... . ........... ..... . ..... . ................... • ............ ........ EST •• • S STA1tTIEN1) .::::; :••••• ._„. . ..... . ..... ...........EVEN ..„.. • --. -• -- • • •••••••-- ------••• • •• -0--- ---• • • 1. Southlake Stampede 5K Run 7/1-9/17 50% Meeting with committee; will provide race day support and some equipment; arranged portable toilets; guaranteed to provide volunteers 2. Halloween Event 8/1-11/1 5% Distributed letter to businesses and churches asking for trick-or-treat site sponsors and volunteers; contacted Lion's Club and Women's Chamber to set initial meeting; searching for location for Haunted House; placed information in Fall brochure; through employee newletter asked for city employee volunteers 1:1 ‘ EST • ' COMMUNITY BUILDING/LODGE SCHEDULES . START/END- : : COMPLETE • REMARKS • -3s.1 • , ...... • .• • •• 1. Reservations for month of August ongoing 61 reservations; approximately 1,120 users 2. Constructed additional office space 8/1-8/30 100% Moved Park Crew Leader and Volunteer Coordinator to two new offices and set up office for Park Project Manager ....................................................................................................................................... • " • • • • •. ••••:. EST . .•: : • ...• •.... •. • • ....ADMINISTRATIVE.. • START/END COMPLETED REMARKS • 1. Regional Meetings ongoing Park Project Manager and Parks and Rec. Coordinator attended Metro Parks and Rec. Directors meeting on ozone issues, Metroport presentation on regional trails system, and United Way's Middle School Task Force meeting 2. Reports Monthly Weekly staff report and monthly Division report 3. 1994-95 Budget March/Sept. 95% Submitted and reviewed final budget with City Manager and Council Workshop 11/1111 ONO(wpm. Nam erns aim Nis mous vie Ito% use rim sae gas sone ens on rime rim CONSTRUCTION::PRO CTS`:::: 1. Bicentennial Park Expansion- Phase I A. Design Phase March/Sept. 95% - Architect received final staff comments B. Bidding Phase Sept./Oct. 0% Open bids September 30th/ Award Oct. 20 C. Construction Phase Oct./Sept. 0% 2. Middle School Gymnasium/Recreation Center A. Design Phase Feb./Aug. 100% Bid several alternates to make budget of$500,000 B. Bidding Phase Sept. 50% Open bids September 22/CISD awards following week C. Construction Phase Oct/May 0% >SPECIAL PRO,) CTS ST RT/END.; COMPL TET): REMARKS 1. City Wide Trail Master Plan RFP's were mailed Aug. 26; Due back to City Sept. A. Consultant Selection Aug./Oct. 5% 20; Plan to have a contract to Council by Oct. 20 B. Plan Development 11/94-3/95 0% • rill Min 1111111 ONO IMO MINI r MEI MINI NMI NMI OEM IIIIIII IMO • >:: EST::.>::>: .' °. • . ;: ; :>::,>::;;:<:>::>:: NA,N.C�.:..E>�C�N'X'��11�A�.r....,A�................................. A��:AND........... ......C�tMIQ�,�'�'� ........................... ..... . 1. Turf establishment on practice fields Aug./March 50% Assembled temporary irrigation system; seeded with bermuda; began irrigation program; prepare for use as game fields in Spring 2. General Maintenance ongoing Mowed and weedeated all areas; collected trash; cleaned restrooms; raked playground; dragged fields; Fill dirt around posts at alternate parking; removed dead trees; levelled area for practice soccer fields; performed soil pulverizing on practice fields; irrigation repairs; removed temporary tree stakes; • aerated fields; removed pitcher mound on Field#1; levelled playing surface on Field#1; landscaping maintenance 3. Fail Baseball/Softball Aug/Nov Prepare fields on Thursdays and Fridays 4. Existing irrigation system Aug/Dec 50% Removed booster pump from system; pump in disrepair and causing decrease in water pressure; rerouted connecting lines to bypass; has increased pressure; will continue to check heads for repairs MAINTENANCE ':: ESA:::>:::: : .>;:;: ::>'.,: °Ia :' :::":;::>:>:::::;;::< '..:. ':.•. ARROLL ELEM AREA :::: ;::::<.: ::.; : ;:STAR'l/END:::>:::>::: ''::�ONIPLETE� `` >:> >:;:<: '' >:<: ''':' ::>::: R�MARI�S;;::>. ....:..::;:::;;,:>:...: t ' 1. General Maintenance ongoing Mowed; collected trash and changed bags; weedeated around backstops 2. Fall Baseball Aug/Nov 10% Will mow more often for 4 baseball practice fields ES: MAINTE E.-INTERMEDIATES >HOOIt::.:. STAR: ND' COMP"ETED::.: : >'::>:>:::::.:;»: <:<::;::::: REMARKS<> NAND : ;.::.0.:.......:. . :: :.;..;..: . fE.:<..:::.;;:.::.. :.;::.:::.;::.::...... ::.: ::... . 1. Reset football goal posts Aug. 100% Were removed for spring baseball/softball; scheduled Public Works assistance 2. Moved bleachers Aug. 100% Were moved to multi-purpose court for summer hockey league. Returned to athletic field. Cleared area under bleacher location; scheduled Public Works assistance 3. General Maintenance ongoing Applied grass killer along multi-purpose court fence line; mowed around multi-purpose court; collected trash; removed home plate; watered new sod 4. Removed concrete blocks left from construction of multi- Aug. 100% Contacted Public Works. Had removed. Notified purpose court school. we r-rwi IIRRI.. MN • • . Aug. 100% Removed pins from timer to prevent lights..om 5. Set timer on lights being turned on since no activities are scheduled for Fall; install again in Spring MAINTENANCE- CITY HALL START]ENI) COMPLETED REMARKS 1. General Maintenance ongoing Trimmed shrubs; removed weeds from planting beds; planted shrubs; pruned flowering plants 2. Repaired irrigation Sept. 90% Capped line where fence was added. 3. Improve Public Safety Entrance Area Sept. 40% Trim back shrubs and remove undergrowth. Add landscaping, bench, and pavestone 4. Landscape Engineering building Oct. 0% Need to develop plan 5. Improve South fence line Oct/Dec. 0% Researching options 3. Plant Fall color / Replace dead shrubs Sept. 0% •• • , • • . EQUIPMENT.MANTENANCE/REPAI.g.':.i:::., , 1. Toro mower ongoing Replaced belt and repaired tension arm; replaced cutting blades; repaired flat tire; Greased fittings 2. Miscellaneous Equipment ongoing Replaced bolts on drag; changed oil in push mower; replaced fuel line on weedeater (..>\ 7. Transmission repaired on Chevrolet truck Aug. Estimates attained. Placed in shop. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR.